Agenda Packet — Salinas City Council, April 12, 2022 (part 3 of 3)

Intersection Control Evaluation
US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/Airport Boulevard in Salinas, CA

INTRODUCTION
An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) was completed for the intersection of Terven Avenue and Airport Boulevard (the “study intersection”) in Salinas, California. The proposed project assumed in the ICE analysis is consistent with the Transportation Impact Analysis – Draft for Airport Industrial Park1(“Project TIA”), prepared by Kimley-Horn in September 2019. The study intersection will be impacted by the planned development of an industrial park project at the Salinas Municipal Airport which includes the proposed construction of 65,166 square feet of warehousing and 65,166 square feet of light industrial land uses (“Project”) located on the east side of US 101 across Airport Boulevard.

The existing four-legged intersection operates as signalized intersection with significant vehicle delay and queuing at each of the approaches. Background and project growths are expected to increase demand at the study intersection until the construction of Harris Road interchange is complete. The new interchange south of Salinas will create a shift in traffic volume and it will alleviate some of the traffic demand at the study intersection. Two of the intersection’s legs are on/off ramps for US 101 and will need to address HDM (highway design manual) standards. The purpose of this ICE is to determine a viable intersection layout to accommodate demand until the Harris Road interchange project is completed, and demand is relieved at the project intersection. The existing layout’s non-standard HDM designs will be noted.

The following intersection control improvement alternatives were evaluated in this ICE Analysis:
· Existing signal (no improvements)
· Improved traffic signal
· Roundabout

EXISTING CONDITION AND PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES
Existing Conditions
Airport Boulevard is a primary southwest to northeast arterial between industrial facilities and the Salinas Municipal Airport. US 101 splits Airport Boulevard in half. The project intersection is located along Airport Boulevard, just to the west of US 101. Airport Boulevard has two lanes in each direction with a two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) and has a posted speed limit of 45 MPH. The northeasterly leg of the intersection is comprised of US 101 southbound (SB) on and off ramps. Terven Avenue runs northwest to southeast between South Sanborn Road to the north and merges with Airport Boulevard just south of the project intersection. Terven Avenue, the northwest leg of the intersection, has one lane in each direction with a posted speed limit of 25 MPH. The existing intersection has a continuous right-turn bypass lane on the eastbound (EB) approach and a yield-controlled right-turn bypass lane on the northbound (NB) approach onto the SB US 101 loop on-ramp. There are sidewalks on both sides of Terven Avenue and along the north side of Airport Boulevard. The existing intersection includes crosswalks across the north and west legs.

There are no present bicycle facilities.

Analysis Scenarios
Design year traffic scenarios were developed using the traffic volume provided in the Project TIA to establish project baseline conditions and to evaluate the effectiveness of intersection control strategies at 1 Transportation Impact Analysis – Draft for Airport Industrial Park, Kimley-Horn, September, 2019.

ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard

Page 2 of 11 ends

the study intersection. As directed by the city of Salinas (the “City”), TAMC, and Caltrans District 4, the weekday AM and PM peak-hour traffic analyses were completed for the following scenarios:
· Opening Year Plus Project (2025) Conditions
· Includes project and background development anticipated to occur by the time the project is constructed. The volume forecasts are based on a list of pending and approved development projects provided by the City.
· Service Life Plus Project and Median Closures (2035) Conditions · Includes the project, background growth, and rerouted vehicles from anticipated median closures at five intersections south of the study intersection. This is the critical year – demand at the project intersection is the greatest it will be. Once the Harris Road interchange project is constructed, demand at the project intersection will be reduced. · Service Life Plus Project after Interchange Opens (2036) Conditions · Includes the project and the decreased demand as a result of the shift in traffic from the completion of Harris Road interchange.
· Design Life Plus Project (2045) Conditions
· Based on Cumulative plus Project volumes provided on Figures 13 of the original TIA.

See Appendix A for the intersection traffic volumes and heavy vehicle percentages that were used for the intersection analysis. In addition, Appendix B includes list of assumptions made for the ICE analysis of the study intersection.

The Existing Signal is projected to operate at LOS F for the peak 2035 design year, with a maximum delay of 110.1 seconds and a maximum 95th percentile queue of 875 feet on WB approach. Table 1 below summarizes the operations for the existing traffic signal. See Appendix C for existing traffic signal synchro operational analysis worksheets.

Table 1: Existing Signal Operations
AM PM
Design
Year LOS Delay(s)
95% Queue
(ft)
(approach)
LOS Delay
(s)
95% Queue
(ft)
(approach)
2025 F 81.0 725 (WB) E 64.3 675 (NB)
2035 F 110.1 875 (WB) E 76.0 750 (NB)
2036 E 71.1 650 (WB) D 40.7 250 (NB)
2045 E 83.1 700 (WB) D 42.7 275 (NB)
Figure 1 illustrates the existing intersection control as well as potential design constraints and considerations. The existing design constraints and considerations at the study intersection include:

1. US 101 Ramp

2. Bridge overpass with available width for three vehicle travel lanes along with bike lane and sidewalk on each side of the bridge

3. Valero gas station right-of-way

4. PBI warehouse right-of-way
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard

Page 3 of 11 ends

Figure 1: Existing Design Constraints on Improved Intersection Geometry Planned Improvements
The proposed interchange at Harris Road which is planned to be fully constructed at around year 2035 will alleviate some of the demand at the study intersection. Because of this, the worst operations are expected to occur right before the interchange is completed. We assume construction of the Harris Road interchange will be completed at around year 2035.
1 2
3 4
1 ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard

Page 4 of 11 ends

Proposed Intersection Control Alternatives
Two intersection control alternatives were ultimately considered in the ICE Analysis for the intersection of US 101 Ramps at Terven Avenue/Airport Boulevard. The existing lane configuration was not deemed viable because it does not meet Caltrans LOS threshold of D. See Appendix D and Appendix E for the operational analysis worksheets for each alternative. The preliminary concept layouts for each alternative based on the operational analyses are included in Appendix F.

Alternative A: Improved Traffic Signal
This alternative includes dual, signal-controlled EB right-turn bypass lanes to accommodate the high rightturn volumes in the PM peak hour. The improved WB approach has dual left-turn lanes to accommodate the demand in the AM peak hour. The worst operations occur during the 2035 AM peak hour with a LOS of D and average delay of 51.9 seconds. The max 95th percentile queue length is the WB approach with 725 feet, which spills into the auxiliary lane on SB US 101. See Table 2 below for the summary of Alternative A analysis. Figure 2 to the right shows a concept layout of the improved traffic signal.

Table 2: Improved Traffic Signal Operations
AM PM
Design
Year LOS Delay(s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach) LOS Delay(s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2025 D 44.3 575 (WB) D 40.7 350 (SB)
2035 D 51.9 725 (WB) D 43.7 500 (EB)
2036 C 32.7 400 (WB) C 27.0 175 (EB)
2045 D 35.8 425 (WB) C 30.6 275 (EB)
Figure 2: Improved Traffic Signal Concept Layout
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard

Page 5 of 11 ends

Alternative B: Roundabout
This alternative includes a multi-lane roundabout with two WB through lanes to accommodate heavy offramp volumes. The worst operations will occur during the 2035 AM peak hour with a LOS C. The operations will improve once the Harris Road interchange opens. The maximum 95th percentile queue length occurs on the WB approach at year 2035 and is 325 feet. The WB queue will extend into the US 101 SB off-ramp but not into the auxiliary lane. Table 3 below includes a summary of the roundabout operations. Figure 3 to the right shows a concept layout of the proposed roundabout.

Table 3: Roundabout Operations
AM PM
Design
Year LOS Delay(s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach) LOS Delay (s) 95% Queue (ft)(approach)
2025 C 15.2 225 (WB) B 11.8 125 (SB)
2035 C 21.7 325 (WB) C 16.0 175 (SB)
2036 A 9.7 125 (WB) A 6.1 50 (NB)
2045 B 11.0 150 (WB) A 6.6 50 (SB)
Figure 3: Roundabout Control Concept Layout
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard

Page 6 of 11 ends

Non-Standard Features
Table 4 identifies all known existing design deficiencies. Note that these are not necessarily all the nonstandard features. These are the major design deficiencies we were able to identify without a sight visit nor topo survey.

Figure 4: Summary of Non-Standard Features

SUMMARY OF KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Five performance metrics are evaluated at the study intersection to calculate the Benefit Cost (B/C) Ratio which measures the expected return on investment for each proposed intersection control. The performance measures used to calculate the benefits of the proposed improvement compared to the existing condition, or no project alternative are:
· Safety Benefit (of the proposed intersection control type) · Delay Reduction Benefit (of the proposed intersection control type) · Emission Reduction Benefit (of the proposed intersection control type) Performance measures used to calculate the conceptual level costs of the proposed intersection control improvement compared to the existing condition, or no project alternative are:
· Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Cost (added costs of the proposed intersection control type) · Initial Capital Cost (added costs of the proposed intersection control type) Refer to Appendix G for a detailed description of each performance measure and the Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table2 that were used in this B/C Analysis.

PERFORMANCE MEASURE SUMMARY
The following figures show the cost of key performance measures for each control types at the intersection of US 101 SB Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard assuming 20-years of intersection operations to calculate life-cycle costs. Each intersection control type corresponds to the proposed alternatives discussed on pages 2 and 3. Table 5 below summarizes the costs associated with each alternative. 2 Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table, Caltrans, January 2020.

HDM Standards Existing Signal Proposed Signal Proposed Roundabout 309.2(1)(a) - Minimum vertical clearance
over the roadbed of the state facility 16'-
6"
Posted sign stating 15'-1"
clearance over the roadbed on
the entrance to US 101 SB
Won't be able to address Won't be able to address
501.3 - Minimum interchange spacing shall
be one mile in urban areas
Less than 1 mile to the
interchange at S Sanborn Rd
Won't be able to address Won't be able to address
504.2(2) - Minimum deceleration length
(DL) shown on Figure 504.2B shall be
provided prior to the first curve beyond the
DL is approximately 300' which
requires a radius of 1,000'. The
current radius is 215'
No Change No Change
504.2(2) - Design of freeway entrances and
exits should conform to the standard
designs in Figures 504.2A-B
Entrance does not match
standard designs in 504.2A
No Change No Change
504.3(8) - Radii for loop ramps should
normally range from 150' to 200'
Loop radius is about 100' No Change Loop radius modified to 90' 504.8 - For new construction or major
reconstruction, access rights shall be
acquired on the opposite side of the local
road from ramp terminals to preclude
driveways or local roads within the ramp
The Valero currently has an
access driveway within the ramp
intersection.

No Change Access to Valero gas station
will not be accessible via exit
ramp.

HDM Non-Standard Design Exceptions
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard

Page 7 of 11 ends

Table 5: Performance Measure Summary
Benefit Performance Measure Summary
Safety Preferred Alternative:

Based on the lowest predicted life-cycle cost
for safety, the preferred intersection control
type for this intersection is a roundabout. See
Appendix H for the Interactive Highway
Safety Design Manual (IHSDM)’s KABCO
values used for the safety analysis.

Delay Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on the lowest predicted lifecycle cost for delay, the preferred intersection control type for this
intersection is a roundabout.

Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Annual Cost of Collisions $ 177,612 $ 176,442 $ 56,129
Discounted Life Cycle Cost of Collisions $ 3,729,860 $ 3,705,292 $ 1,178,719 Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Annual Quantity (hours) 27,530 14,847 3,981
Annual Cost $ 395,666 $ 214,887 $ 58,386
Total Discounted Life Cycle Cost $ 8,308,990 $ 4,512,637 $ 1,226,107 Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Annual Cost $ 25,879 $ 27,455 $ 35,287
Total Discounted Life Cycle Cost $ 351,700 $ 373,123 $ 479,559 Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Annual O&M Costs $ 8,060 $ 8,060 $ 2,520
Discounted Life Cycle O&M Costs $ 109,538 $ 109,538 $ 34,248 Discounted Pavement Rehab Costs $ - $ 45,639 $ 36,511
Total O&M Costs $ 109,538 $ 155,177 $ 70,759
Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Approximate Initial Capital Costs $0 $743,300 $3,300,000

LIFE CYCLE COST CALCULATIONS

PERFORMANCE MEASURE LIFE CYCLE COST (NET PRESENT VALUE) Safety
Delay
Emissions
Initial Capital
O&M
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard

Page 8 of 11 ends

Emissions Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on the life-cycle cost for
emissions, the preferred intersection
control type for this intersection is a signal.

Cost Performance Measure Summary
O&M Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on lowest expected annual O&M
costs, the preferred intersection control type
for this intersection is a roundabout.

Initial Capital Costs Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on lowest expected range of
Initial Capital Costs, the preferred intersection
control type for this intersection is a signal.

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SUMMARY
The bar chart to the left compares the
peak hour intersection delay for design
year between the improved traffic signal
and roundabout. The improved traffic
signal operates with considerable delay
compared to the roundabout.

The bar chart to the left illustrates the
calculated average speeds through the
study intersection used to determine AB
2766 cost effectiveness. The study limit on
each leg was based on the largest of the
95% queue lengths of all the intersection
control types. The improved traffic signal
offers the highest average speed when
compared to the roundabout.

ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard

Page 9 of 11 ends

B/C ANALYSIS SUMMARY
B/C Ratio Scoring
The following equation illustrates the B/C ratio and Table 6 provides the description of B/C ratio scoring:
۰۱⁄ Ratio Score =
ܛ܍ܚܝܛ܉܍ۻ ܍܋ܖ܉ܕܚܗ܎ܚ܍۾ ܜܑ܎܍ܖ܍۰ ∑
ܛ܍ܚܝܛ܉܍ۻ ܍܋ܖ܉ܕܚܗ܎ܚ܍۾ ܜܛܗ۱ ∑
Table 6: Description of B/C Ratio Scoring
B/C Ratio Score Description
B/C = 1.00 A B/C ratio of 1.00 is a neutral rating. This indicates that the ROI for existing signal is equal to improved signal/roundabout.

B/C < 1.00 A B/C ratio less than 1.00 indicates that the existing signal will provide a better ROI when compared to improved signal/roundabout.

B/C > 1.00 A B/C ratio greater than 1.00 indicates that improved signal/roundabout provides a better ROI when compared to the existing signal.

B/C = NA-R When the cost of the improved signal/roundabout is less than the cost of the existing signal and the improved signal/roundabout provides benefit over the existing signal, a B/C ratio cannot be computed. This special case is denoted by “NA-R” and indicates that improved signal/roundabout provides a better ROI when compared to the existing signal.

The B/C score is based on the net present value using a discount rate of 4% through the life-cycle duration of 20 years for each of the five performance measures.

Note: ROI=Return of Investment
The summary results of the stage 1 B/C analysis at the study intersection are summarized in Table 7. The stage 1 B/C analysis is based on comparing the improved signal and roundabout alternatives to the existing signal. Both the improved traffic signal and the roundabout have B/C ratios greater than 1.0, which indicate that they are both cost-effective intersection control types when compared to the existing signal.

Table 7: Summary of Life-Cycle B/C Analysis – Stage 1 B/C Ratios A second stage of B/C analysis was performed to determine the preferred alternative intersection control type between the improved traffic signal and a roundabout. Total benefits and costs were calculated based on directly comparing the roundabout to the signal. The preferred intersection control type, shown in Table 8 is based solely on the B/C score and the expected return of investment for the 20-year life-cycle starting in 2025 and ending 2045. See Appendix I for the Life-Cycle B/C worksheet which includes a detailed breakdown of each performance measure life-cycle costs at the study intersection.

Added Benefits Compared to Existing (Signal) Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout Safety $ - $ 24,569 $ 2,551,141
Delay $ - $ 3,796,353 $ 7,082,884
Emission $ - $ (21,423) $ (127,859)
Total Benefits $ - $ 3,799,498 $ 9,506,166
Added Cost Compared to Existing (Signal) Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout O&M $ - $ 45,639 $ (38,779)
Initial Capital $ - $ 743,300 $ 3,300,000
Total Costs $ - $ 788,939 $ 3,261,221
B/C Ratio Compared to Existing (Signal) N/A 4.82 2.91

LIFE CYCLE BENEFIT COST RATIO
Total Benefits ( B )
Total Costs ( C )
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard

Page 10 of 11 ends

Table 8: Summary of Life-Cycle B/C Analysis – Stage 2 B/C Ratios Figure 6 shows the accumulated cost of
all five performance measures for each
proposed alternative. This figure reflects
the B/C ratio results between each
alternative. The roundabout starts with a
larger accumulated cost because of the
greater initial capital cost, but because of
the signal’s greater societal costs the
roundabout provides a greater return on
investment after 2030. The slopes start to
decrease in year 2035 due to the reduced
demand once the Harris Road
interchange opens. The roundabout is the
preferred intersection control type for
the entire 20-year analysis time period.

Figure 6: Accumulated Costs Between Proposed Alternatives

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
An analysis of the estimated benefit and cost performance measures indicate that, when forecast traffic volumes are considered for a minimum 20-year service life, a roundabout-controlled intersection is the preferred alternative at the intersection of US 101 SB ramps at Terven Avenue/Airport Boulevard. · The existing signal will have the longest delays and queue lengths out of all the intersection control alternatives at the study intersection.
· The improved traffic signal will perform at LOS D service year (2035) conditions with a maximum 95th percentile queue length of 725 feet on the US 101 SB off-ramp in the AM peak period and 500 feet on the EB Airport Boulevard approach in the PM peak period. The improved traffic signal will operate at LOS C and D in the 2045 peak periods.
· The roundabout will perform at LOS A and C at service year (2035) conditions with a maximum 95th percentile queue length of 175 feet on the Terven Ave approach in the PM peak hour and 325 feet on the US 101 SB off-ramp in the AM peak hour. The roundabout operates at LOS A and B in the 2045 peak periods.
· The B/C ratios for the intersection are 4.82 and 2.91 respectively, when the improved traffic signal and roundabout are compared to the existing signal. Since the B/C ratios are greater than 1.0, both improved signal and roundabout are more cost-effective and preferred when compared to the existing signal.
· The B/C ratio is 2.31 when comparing the roundabout and the improved traffic signal alternatives B/C
( A ) ( B ) ( C ) = ( B - A ) ( D ) ( E ) ( F ) = ( C + D ) ( G ) = ( E / F ) High $ 817,630 $ 2,970,000 $ 2,152,370 $ 2,067,952 2.81 Low $ 668,970 $ 3,630,000 $ 2,961,030 $ 2,876,612 2.02
Roundabout Budget $ 743,300 $ 6,640,822 $ 5,897,522 $ 5,813,103 1.00 Benefit-Cost Ratio Calculations for Proposed Signal (A) vs Roundabout (B) B/C Target
Proposed
Signal
Initial Capital Cost
Roundabout Added Cost
Project Constraints
Added O&M Cost for
Roundabout Total Benefits Total Costs
$ (84,418) $ 5,813,103
Note: The 'High' value calculates the highest Roundabout B/C. Assuming the high Proposed Signal ICC and the low Roundabout ICC. The 'Low' value calculates the lowest Roundabout B/C. Assuming the low Proposed Signal ICC and the high Roundabout ICC.

ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard

Page 11 of 11 ends

to each other to determine the most preferred intersection control type at the study intersection.

The roundabout alternative has a total added benefit of about $5,706,667 when compared to the signal.

The most noteworthy performance measures driving the B/C Ratios are delay. The roundabout and traffic control alternatives have an added delay benefit of greater than $7,000,000 and $3,600,000 respectively when compared to the existing signal.

The existing intersection does not conform to the Highway Design Manual standards. Neither of the proposed alternatives will improve any of the existing non-standard designs due to high demand and tight constraints. The proposed roundabout will modify the US 101 SB on-ramp to have a radius of 90’ (currently 100’) and will eliminate access to the Valero gas station from the US 101 SB off-ramp.

Appendix
Appendix A – Traffic Volumes
Appendix B – List of Assumptions
Appendix C – Existing Traffic Signal Synchro Operational Analysis Appendix D – Improved Traffic Signal Synchro Operational Analysis Appendix E – Roundabout SIDRA Operational Analysis
Appendix F – Preliminary Concept Layouts for Improved Traffic Signal and Roundabout Appendix G – Description of Benefit Cost Performance Measures and Caltrans Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table
Appendix H – HSM Predictive Method Safety Analysis IHSDM KABCO Values Appendix I – Life-Cycle Benefit-Cost Ratio Worksheet
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021
Appendix A
Traffic Volumes
US 101 SB Ramps at Terven Ave/Airport Blvd
2025
Vehicles 0 283 132 100 0 483 511 60 0 26 143 77 0 74 25 345 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Truck % - 10.0% 8.0% 28.0% - 2.0% 14.0% 2.0% - 43.0% 10.0% 12.0% - 27.0% 55.0% 21.0% Pedestrians
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2025
Vehicles 0 284 181 263 0 254 233 30 0 68 154 90 0 122 53 932 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Truck % - 10.0% 10.0% 6.0% - 7.0% 26.0% 23.0% - 19.0% 9.0% 37.0% - 6.0% 28.0% 4.0% Pedestrians
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2035
Vehicles 0 305 142 167 0 558 551 65 0 28 153 83 0 80 27 371 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Truck % - 10.0% 8.0% 28.0% - 2.0% 14.0% 2.0% - 43.0% 10.0% 12.0% - 27.0% 55.0% 21.0% Pedestrians
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2035
Vehicles 0 306 194 323 0 333 251 32 0 73 166 97 0 131 57 1004 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Truck % - 10.0% 10.0% 6.0% - 7.0% 26.0% 23.0% - 19.0% 9.0% 37.0% - 6.0% 28.0% 4.0% Pedestrians
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NB
NB
NB
0 0 0
SB
WB SB
Scenario 2 - Service Life (2035) Before Interchange Opens - CRITICAL VOLUME AM
Source:

PM
0 0 0
EB

WB SB EB
WB
NOTE: Minimum PHF used in operations analysis is =0.70
PM
US 101 SB Off-Ramp at Terven Ave/Airport Blvd
10/28/2020
Scenario 1 - Opening Year (2025)
AM

NB WB SB EB
0 0
EB
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
US 101 SB Ramps at Terven Ave/Airport Blvd
2036
Vehicles 0 272 148 102 0 436 336 78 0 9 90 29 0 71 21 273 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Truck % - 10.0% 8.0% 28.0% - 2.0% 14.0% 2.0% - 43.0% 10.0% 12.0% - 27.0% 55.0% 21.0% Pedestrians
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2036
Vehicles 0 140 96 202 0 202 170 29 0 36 86 48 0 70 26 584 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Truck % - 10.0% 10.0% 6.0% - 7.0% 26.0% 23.0% - 19.0% 9.0% 37.0% - 6.0% 28.0% 4.0% Pedestrians
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2045
Vehicles 0 291 158 108 0 464 360 84 0 10 96 31 0 76 23 292 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Truck % - 10.0% 8.0% 28.0% - 2.0% 14.0% 2.0% - 43.0% 10.0% 12.0% - 27.0% 55.0% 21.0% Pedestrians
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2045
Vehicles 0 148 99 217 0 240 182 31 0 38 101 51 0 75 28 629 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Truck % - 10.0% 10.0% 6.0% - 7.0% 26.0% 23.0% - 19.0% 9.0% 37.0% - 6.0% 28.0% 4.0% Pedestrians
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
Source:
0 0 0 0

NB WB SB EB
AM

NB WB SB EB
SB EB
NB
AM
WB SB
Scenario 3 - Service Life (2036) After Interchange Opens PM
0 NB
PM
0 0
WB
0 0
EB
0 0 0 0
Scenario 4 - Design Life (2045)
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021
Appendix B
List of Assumptions
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021

LIST OF ASSUMPTIONS
Traffic Data
§ Existing peak-hour turning movement volumes. Traffic Count Data obtained from Airport Industrial Park TIA (2019).
§ Opening Year Plus Project (PP) (2025) peak-hour turning movement volumes. Includes project and background development anticipated to occur by the time the project is constructed. The volume forecasts are based on a list of pending and approved development projects provided by the City. § Service Life PP and Median Closures (2035) peak-hour turning movement volumes. Background Volumes were grown at the AMBAG Model annual growth rate of 0.75% for 10 years to 2035.

Additional volumes were added from anticipated median closures at five intersections south of the study intersection.
§ Service Life PP after Interchange Closes (2036) peak-hour turning movement volumes. Reduction in background Volumes were determined using the AMBAG Model annual growth rate of 0.75% for 9 years from the 2045 volumes down to the 2036 volumes. § Design Life PP (2045) peak-hour turning movement volumes. Based on Cumulative PP volumes provided in figure 13 of the Airport Industrial Park TIA. § Opening Year PP (2025) ADT. The ADTs are calculated using the PM peak hour traffic count data. § Terven Avenue: 20,680
§ Airport Boulevard: 17,140
§ Service Life PP and Median Closures (2035) ADT. The ADTs are calculated using the PM peak hour traffic count data.
§ Terven Avenue: 23,263
§ Airport Boulevard: 18,466
§ Service Life PP after Interchange Closes PP (2036) ADT. The ADTs are calculated using the PM peak hour traffic count data.
§ Terven Avenue: 13,207
§ Airport Boulevard: 10,385
§ Design Life PP (2045) ADT. The ADTs are calculated using the PM peak hour traffic count data. § Terven Avenue: 14,340
§ Airport Boulevard: 11,130
§ Pedestrian counts. Not provided.
§ Bicycle counts. Not provided.

Opinion of Probable Cost
§ Initial capital costs. Estimated ranges of initial capital costs from previous comparable projects.

ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021
Appendix C
Existing Traffic Signal Synchro Operational Analysis
US 101 SB at Terven Ave Opening Year PP (2025)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 80 27 525 620 451 109 183 84
v/c Ratio 0.52 0.15 1.26 0.66 0.98 0.25 0.60 0.23
Control Delay 59.1 43.3 173.1 39.5 77.5 5.7 51.5 3.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 59.1 43.3 173.1 39.5 77.5 5.7 51.5 3.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 55 17 ~467 207 317 0 120 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 105 45 #718 291 #557 34 206 16
Internal Link Dist (ft) 256 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 50 50
Base Capacity (vph) 270 270 416 937 462 439 304 367
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.10 1.26 0.66 0.98 0.25 0.60 0.23 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Opening Year PP (2025)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 74 25 0 483 511 60 283 132 100 26 143 77 Future Volume (veh/h) 74 25 0 483 511 60 283 132 100 26 143 77 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1500 1085 0 1870 1693 1693 1781 1781 1485 1752 1752 1722 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 80 27 0 525 555 65 308 143 0 28 155 84 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 27 55 0 2 14 14 8 8 28 10 10 12
Cap, veh/h 98 145 0 426 882 103 329 153 50 278 276
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.24 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1428 1085 0 1781 2901 339 1176 546 1259 266 1473 1457 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 80 27 0 525 307 313 451 0 0 183 0 84 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1428 1085 0 1781 1608 1632 1723 0 1259 1739 0 1457 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.1 2.4 0.0 26.3 18.1 18.2 28.1 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 5.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.1 2.4 0.0 26.3 18.1 18.2 28.1 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 5.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.21 0.68 1.00 0.15 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 98 145 0 426 489 496 482 0 329 0 276 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.19 0.00 1.23 0.63 0.63 0.94 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 277 145 0 426 489 496 482 0 329 0 276 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.6 42.3 0.0 41.9 32.9 32.9 38.6 0.0 0.0 40.4 0.0 38.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.7 2.8 0.0 123.7 6.0 6.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.7 0.8 0.0 25.6 7.5 7.7 15.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 2.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.2 45.2 0.0 165.5 38.9 38.9 66.2 0.0 0.0 47.1 0.0 41.2 LnGrp LOS E D A F D D E A D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 107 1145 451 A 267
Approach Delay, s/veh 62.4 97.0 66.2 45.2
Approach LOS E F E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 20.0 25.0 11.2 38.8 35.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.3 14.7 * 21 21.3 29.7 30.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 28.3 4.4 12.5 8.1 20.2 30.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.2 2.4 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 81.0
HCM 6th LOS F
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Opening Year PP (2025)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 133 58 276 286 506 286 241 98
v/c Ratio 0.61 0.20 0.83 0.38 1.11 0.57 0.79 0.31
Control Delay 58.8 41.9 64.7 35.4 115.7 24.9 63.9 6.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 58.8 41.9 64.7 35.4 115.7 24.9 63.9 6.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 93 36 191 86 ~422 98 169 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 157 77 #315 135 #675 201 #316 28 Internal Link Dist (ft) 256 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 50 50
Base Capacity (vph) 320 323 391 748 455 506 306 316
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.18 0.71 0.38 1.11 0.57 0.79 0.31 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Opening Year PP (2025)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 122 53 0 254 233 30 284 181 263 68 154 90 Future Volume (veh/h) 122 53 0 254 233 30 284 181 263 68 154 90 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1485 0 1796 1515 1515 1752 1752 1811 1767 1767 1352 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 133 58 0 276 253 33 309 197 0 74 167 98 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 28 0 7 26 26 10 10 6 9 9 37
Cap, veh/h 164 278 0 308 698 90 293 187 102 230 218
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.19 0.00 0.18 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1485 0 1711 2563 331 1038 662 1535 534 1206 1144 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 133 58 0 276 141 145 506 0 0 241 0 98 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1485 0 1711 1439 1455 1700 0 1535 1740 0 1144 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.2 3.6 0.0 17.2 8.6 8.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.0 8.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.2 3.6 0.0 17.2 8.6 8.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.0 8.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.23 0.61 1.00 0.31 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 164 278 0 308 392 396 480 0 332 0 218 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.21 0.00 0.90 0.36 0.37 1.05 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 337 278 0 413 392 396 480 0 332 0 218 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.4 37.5 0.0 43.7 32.0 32.1 39.1 0.0 0.0 41.5 0.0 39.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.9 1.7 0.0 17.5 2.6 2.6 56.1 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 6.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.1 1.5 0.0 8.5 3.2 3.3 19.6 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 59.3 39.2 0.0 61.2 34.6 34.7 95.2 0.0 0.0 54.5 0.0 45.6 LnGrp LOS E D A E C C F A D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 191 562 506 A 339
Approach Delay, s/veh 53.2 47.7 95.2 51.9
Approach LOS D D F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.4 25.7 25.0 14.1 35.0 35.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.3 14.7 * 21 21.3 29.7 30.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.2 5.6 16.2 10.2 10.8 32.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.1 0.7 0.3 1.4 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 64.3
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Salinas Airport TIA Existing Plus Project
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn & Associates Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 29 607 626 486 182 196 90
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.16 1.47 0.67 1.06 0.42 0.65 0.25
Control Delay 59.5 43.2 255.0 40.0 97.6 14.9 53.9 4.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 59.5 43.2 255.0 40.0 97.6 14.9 53.9 4.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 18 ~593 211 ~378 30 131 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 112 46 #862 297 #621 99 #223 21
Internal Link Dist (ft) 256 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 50 50
Base Capacity (vph) 269 269 414 931 460 437 303 366
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.11 1.47 0.67 1.06 0.42 0.65 0.25 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Salinas Airport TIA Existing Plus Project
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn & Associates Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 80 27 0 558 511 65 305 142 167 28 153 83 Future Volume (veh/h) 80 27 0 558 511 65 305 142 167 28 153 83 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1500 1085 0 1870 1693 1693 1781 1781 1485 1752 1752 1722 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 87 29 0 607 555 71 332 154 0 30 166 90 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 27 55 0 2 14 14 8 8 28 10 10 12
Cap, veh/h 106 145 0 426 856 109 329 153 50 278 276
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.24 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1428 1085 0 1781 2869 366 1177 546 1259 266 1472 1457 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 87 29 0 607 310 316 486 0 0 196 0 90 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1428 1085 0 1781 1608 1627 1723 0 1259 1738 0 1457 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 2.6 0.0 26.3 18.5 18.6 30.8 0.0 0.0 11.3 0.0 5.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.6 2.6 0.0 26.3 18.5 18.6 30.8 0.0 0.0 11.3 0.0 5.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.22 0.68 1.00 0.15 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 106 145 0 426 480 485 482 0 329 0 276 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.20 0.00 1.43 0.65 0.65 1.01 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 277 145 0 426 480 485 482 0 329 0 276 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.2 42.4 0.0 41.9 33.6 33.6 39.6 0.0 0.0 40.8 0.0 38.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 16.6 3.1 0.0 204.6 6.6 6.6 42.9 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 3.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.9 0.8 0.0 35.2 7.8 7.9 18.1 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 66.8 45.5 0.0 246.5 40.2 40.2 82.5 0.0 0.0 48.5 0.0 41.7 LnGrp LOS E D A F D D F A D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 116 1233 486 A 286
Approach Delay, s/veh 61.5 141.7 82.5 46.4
Approach LOS E F F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 20.0 25.0 11.9 38.1 35.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.3 14.7 * 21 21.3 29.7 30.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 28.3 4.6 13.3 8.6 20.6 32.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.2 2.4 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 110.9
HCM 6th LOS F
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Service Life PP (2035)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 62 362 308 544 351 259 105
v/c Ratio 0.63 0.25 0.93 0.41 1.21 0.70 0.85 0.33
Control Delay 59.3 43.8 76.0 36.2 149.5 32.6 71.7 7.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 59.3 43.8 76.0 36.2 149.5 32.6 71.7 7.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 100 40 261 95 ~485 150 185 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 166 81 #476 147 #748 278 #353 35 Internal Link Dist (ft) 256 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 50 50
Base Capacity (vph) 317 320 388 751 451 503 303 314
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.19 0.93 0.41 1.21 0.70 0.85 0.33 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Service Life PP (2035)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 131 57 0 333 251 32 306 194 323 73 166 97 Future Volume (veh/h) 131 57 0 333 251 32 306 194 323 73 166 97 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1485 0 1796 1515 1515 1752 1752 1811 1767 1767 1352 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 62 0 362 273 35 333 211 0 79 180 105 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 28 0 7 26 26 10 10 6 9 9 37
Cap, veh/h 173 214 0 389 695 88 292 185 101 229 217
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.14 0.00 0.23 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1485 0 1711 2569 326 1040 659 1535 531 1209 1144 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 142 62 0 362 152 156 544 0 0 259 0 105 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1485 0 1711 1439 1456 1700 0 1535 1740 0 1144 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.9 4.1 0.0 22.8 9.4 9.6 30.8 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 9.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.9 4.1 0.0 22.8 9.4 9.6 30.8 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 9.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.22 0.61 1.00 0.31 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 173 214 0 389 389 394 477 0 330 0 217 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.29 0.00 0.93 0.39 0.40 1.14 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 335 214 0 410 389 394 477 0 330 0 217 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.4 42.0 0.0 41.5 32.6 32.7 39.5 0.0 0.0 42.3 0.0 39.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.8 3.4 0.0 27.1 2.9 3.0 85.7 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 7.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.3 1.7 0.0 12.1 3.5 3.6 23.5 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 2.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 59.2 45.4 0.0 68.7 35.5 35.7 125.2 0.0 0.0 59.3 0.0 47.2 LnGrp LOS E D A E D D F A E A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 204 670 544 A 364
Approach Delay, s/veh 55.0 53.5 125.2 55.8
Approach LOS D D F E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.7 21.1 25.0 14.7 35.0 35.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.3 14.7 * 21 21.3 29.7 30.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 24.8 6.1 17.6 10.9 11.6 32.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.3 1.5 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 76.0
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave After Interchange Opens PP (2036) 1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 77 23 474 450 457 111 108 32
v/c Ratio 0.51 0.13 1.14 0.48 0.98 0.25 0.35 0.09
Control Delay 58.9 43.0 127.2 34.0 79.4 5.8 43.7 0.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 58.9 43.0 127.2 34.0 79.4 5.8 43.7 0.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 15 ~389 135 321 0 67 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 102 39 #629 200 #564 35 127 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 256 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 50 50
Base Capacity (vph) 271 271 416 944 464 439 311 367
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.08 1.14 0.48 0.98 0.25 0.35 0.09 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave After Interchange Opens PP (2036) 1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 71 21 0 436 336 78 272 148 102 9 90 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 71 21 0 436 336 78 272 148 102 9 90 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1500 1085 0 1870 1693 1693 1781 1781 1485 1752 1752 1722 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 77 23 0 474 365 85 296 161 0 10 98 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 27 55 0 2 14 14 8 8 28 10 10 12
Cap, veh/h 94 145 0 426 796 183 313 170 31 299 276
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.24 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1428 1085 0 1781 2595 598 1118 608 1259 161 1582 1457 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 77 23 0 474 225 225 457 0 0 108 0 32 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1428 1085 0 1781 1608 1585 1726 0 1259 1744 0 1457 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.9 2.1 0.0 26.3 12.4 12.6 28.5 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 2.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 2.1 0.0 26.3 12.4 12.6 28.5 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 2.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.38 0.65 1.00 0.09 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 94 145 0 426 493 486 483 0 330 0 276 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.16 0.00 1.11 0.46 0.46 0.95 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.12 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 277 145 0 426 493 486 483 0 330 0 276 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.7 42.2 0.0 41.9 30.7 30.8 38.8 0.0 0.0 38.6 0.0 37.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.2 2.3 0.0 78.0 3.0 3.2 29.5 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.6 0.7 0.0 20.2 5.0 5.1 15.4 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.9 44.5 0.0 119.8 33.7 34.0 68.2 0.0 0.0 41.2 0.0 37.8 LnGrp LOS E D A F C C E A D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 100 924 457 A 140
Approach Delay, s/veh 63.3 78.0 68.2 40.4
Approach LOS E E E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 20.0 25.0 11.0 39.0 35.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.3 14.7 * 21 21.3 29.7 30.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 28.3 4.1 7.9 7.9 14.6 30.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 2.1 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 71.1
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave After Interchange Opens PP (2036) 1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 28 220 217 256 220 132 52
v/c Ratio 0.45 0.11 0.74 0.27 0.53 0.42 0.41 0.16
Control Delay 55.0 40.0 57.3 30.2 38.2 16.9 43.8 1.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 55.0 40.0 57.3 30.2 38.2 16.9 43.8 1.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 51 16 148 58 152 51 82 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 99 45 224 96 248 125 148 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 256 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 50 50
Base Capacity (vph) 338 342 414 794 482 528 324 327
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.08 0.53 0.27 0.53 0.42 0.41 0.16 Intersection Summary
US 101 SB at Terven Ave After Interchange Opens PP (2036) 1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 70 26 0 202 170 29 140 96 202 36 86 48 Future Volume (veh/h) 70 26 0 202 170 29 140 96 202 36 86 48 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1485 0 1796 1515 1515 1752 1752 1811 1767 1767 1352 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 76 28 0 220 185 32 152 104 0 39 93 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 28 0 7 26 26 10 10 6 9 9 37
Cap, veh/h 103 288 0 255 696 118 296 203 102 243 227
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.19 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1485 0 1711 2460 418 1010 691 1535 514 1227 1144 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 76 28 0 220 107 110 256 0 0 132 0 52 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1485 0 1711 1439 1439 1701 0 1535 1741 0 1144 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 1.6 0.0 13.2 6.0 6.2 13.1 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.0 4.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 1.6 0.0 13.2 6.0 6.2 13.1 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.0 4.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.29 0.59 1.00 0.30 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 103 288 0 255 407 407 499 0 345 0 227 V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.10 0.00 0.86 0.26 0.27 0.51 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 350 288 0 429 407 407 499 0 345 0 227 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.6 34.8 0.0 43.6 29.1 29.2 30.8 0.0 0.0 36.5 0.0 35.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.9 0.7 0.0 9.2 1.6 1.6 3.7 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.6 0.0 6.0 2.2 2.3 5.6 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.5 35.4 0.0 52.9 30.7 30.8 34.6 0.0 0.0 39.7 0.0 37.7 LnGrp LOS E D A D C C C A D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 104 437 256 A 184
Approach Delay, s/veh 53.7 41.9 34.6 39.1
Approach LOS D D C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.3 25.6 25.0 9.9 35.0 35.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.3 14.7 * 21 21.3 29.7 30.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.2 3.6 8.9 6.5 8.2 15.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.2 1.0 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 40.7
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Design Life PP (2045)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 76 23 0 464 360 84 291 158 108 10 96 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 76 23 0 464 360 84 291 158 108 10 96 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1500 1085 0 1870 1693 1693 1781 1781 1485 1752 1752 1722 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 83 25 0 504 391 91 316 172 0 11 104 34 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 27 55 0 2 14 14 8 8 28 10 10 12
Cap, veh/h 101 145 0 426 783 180 313 170 32 298 276
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.24 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1428 1085 0 1781 2595 598 1117 608 1259 167 1577 1457 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 83 25 0 504 241 241 488 0 0 115 0 34 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1428 1085 0 1781 1608 1585 1726 0 1259 1743 0 1457 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.3 2.2 0.0 26.3 13.5 13.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 2.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.3 2.2 0.0 26.3 13.5 13.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 2.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.38 0.65 1.00 0.10 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 101 145 0 426 485 478 483 0 330 0 276 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.17 0.00 1.18 0.50 0.50 1.01 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.12 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 277 145 0 426 485 478 483 0 330 0 276 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.4 42.3 0.0 41.9 31.5 31.6 39.6 0.0 0.0 38.7 0.0 37.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.2 2.6 0.0 104.1 3.6 3.8 43.5 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 0.7 0.0 23.3 5.5 5.6 18.2 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 67.6 44.8 0.0 146.0 35.1 35.4 83.1 0.0 0.0 41.6 0.0 37.9 LnGrp LOS E D A F D D F A D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 108 986 488 A 149
Approach Delay, s/veh 62.3 91.9 83.1 40.8
Approach LOS E F F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 20.0 25.0 11.5 38.5 35.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.3 14.7 * 21 21.3 29.7 30.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 28.3 4.2 8.3 8.3 15.8 32.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 2.2 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 83.1
HCM 6th LOS F
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Design Life PP (2045)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 82 30 261 232 269 236 151 55
v/c Ratio 0.47 0.12 0.80 0.29 0.56 0.45 0.47 0.17
Control Delay 55.5 41.4 60.0 30.9 39.4 18.4 45.5 1.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 55.5 41.4 60.0 30.9 39.4 18.4 45.5 1.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 55 18 176 63 162 60 96 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 105 48 268 104 263 141 169 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 256 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 50 50
Base Capacity (vph) 336 339 411 799 478 525 324 325
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.09 0.64 0.29 0.56 0.45 0.47 0.17 Intersection Summary
US 101 SB at Terven Ave Design Life PP (2045)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 75 28 0 240 182 31 148 99 217 38 101 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 75 28 0 240 182 31 148 99 217 38 101 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1485 0 1796 1515 1515 1752 1752 1811 1767 1767 1352 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 82 30 0 261 198 34 161 108 0 41 110 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 28 0 7 26 26 10 10 6 9 9 37
Cap, veh/h 106 254 0 295 696 117 298 200 94 251 226
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1485 0 1711 2463 416 1018 683 1535 473 1270 1144 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 82 30 0 261 114 118 269 0 0 151 0 55 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1485 0 1711 1439 1440 1701 0 1535 1743 0 1144 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 1.8 0.0 15.7 6.5 6.7 14.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 4.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 1.8 0.0 15.7 6.5 6.7 14.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 4.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.29 0.60 1.00 0.27 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 106 254 0 295 406 407 498 0 345 0 226 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.12 0.00 0.88 0.28 0.29 0.54 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 349 254 0 428 406 407 498 0 345 0 226 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.6 36.8 0.0 42.5 29.4 29.5 31.2 0.0 0.0 37.0 0.0 35.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.4 0.9 0.0 14.2 1.7 1.8 4.2 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 0.7 0.0 7.5 2.4 2.4 6.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.0 37.8 0.0 56.7 31.1 31.3 35.4 0.0 0.0 41.1 0.0 38.1 LnGrp LOS E D A E C C D A D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 112 493 269 A 206
Approach Delay, s/veh 55.5 44.7 35.4 40.3
Approach LOS E D D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.8 23.3 25.0 10.2 35.0 35.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.3 14.7 * 21 21.3 29.7 30.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.7 3.8 10.0 6.9 8.7 16.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.1 0.7 0.2 1.1 1.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.7
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021
Appendix D
Improved Traffic Signal Synchro Operational Analysis
US 101 SB at Terven Ave Opening Year PP (2025)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 80 27 375 525 620 222 229 109 28 239 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.08 0.33 0.85 0.93 0.94 0.91 0.20 0.27 0.72 Control Delay 69.8 25.1 15.0 49.2 48.7 86.1 77.4 2.3 46.0 44.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 69.8 25.1 15.0 49.2 48.7 86.1 77.4 2.3 46.0 44.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 45 11 71 148 337 133 136 0 15 114 Queue Length 95th (ft) #116 32 106 #222 #566 #278 #278 15 42 #221 Internal Link Dist (ft) 526 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 285 135 30 125 200
Base Capacity (vph) 119 341 1149 658 670 235 251 538 107 331 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.67 0.08 0.33 0.80 0.93 0.94 0.91 0.20 0.26 0.72 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Opening Year PP (2025)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 74 25 345 483 511 60 283 132 100 26 143 77 Future Volume (veh/h) 74 25 345 483 511 60 283 132 100 26 143 77 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1500 1085 1589 1870 1693 1693 1752 1781 1485 1263 1752 1752 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 80 27 375 525 555 65 226 258 0 28 155 84 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 27 55 21 2 14 14 10 8 28 43 10 10
Cap, veh/h 97 306 1029 600 576 67 254 560 47 205 111
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.17 0.39 0.39 0.15 0.31 0.00 0.04 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1428 1085 2370 3456 1487 174 1668 1781 1259 1203 1069 579 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 80 27 375 525 0 620 226 258 0 28 0 239 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1428 1085 1185 1728 0 1661 1668 1781 1259 1203 0 1648 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 1.6 9.4 13.1 0.0 32.3 11.8 10.3 0.0 2.0 0.0 12.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 1.6 9.4 13.1 0.0 32.3 11.8 10.3 0.0 2.0 0.0 12.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 97 306 1029 600 0 644 254 560 47 0 316 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.09 0.36 0.87 0.00 0.96 0.89 0.46 0.59 0.00 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 121 306 1029 668 0 644 254 560 103 0 316 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.7 23.4 16.8 35.6 0.0 26.5 36.8 24.3 0.0 41.8 0.0 33.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 24.8 0.6 1.0 10.7 0.0 27.5 29.3 2.7 0.0 4.3 0.0 15.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.5 2.4 6.1 0.0 16.3 6.6 4.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 6.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.5 24.0 17.8 46.3 0.0 54.0 66.1 27.1 0.0 46.1 0.0 49.2 LnGrp LOS E C B D A D E C D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 482 1145 484 A 267
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.1 50.5 45.3 48.9
Approach LOS C D D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.1 30.2 18.0 21.2 9.7 39.6 7.2 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 4.5 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 3.7 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.1 24.7 13.5 * 17 7.5 34.3 7.6 * 24 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.1 11.4 13.8 14.1 6.9 34.3 4.0 12.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.9 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 44.3
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Opening Year PP (2025)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 133 58 1013 276 286 247 259 286 74 265 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.10 0.59 0.93 0.52 0.85 0.84 0.44 0.56 0.99 Control Delay 64.2 22.0 13.6 87.1 31.5 68.9 66.8 6.2 63.9 95.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 64.2 22.0 13.6 87.1 31.5 68.9 66.8 6.2 63.9 95.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 91 26 218 101 154 176 185 0 51 174 Queue Length 95th (ft) 152 54 282 #183 254 #315 #323 66 99 #347 Internal Link Dist (ft) 526 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 285 135 30 125 200
Base Capacity (vph) 256 584 1749 297 554 307 308 648 163 267 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.52 0.10 0.58 0.93 0.52 0.80 0.84 0.44 0.45 0.99 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Opening Year PP (2025)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 122 53 932 254 233 30 284 181 263 68 154 90 Future Volume (veh/h) 122 53 932 254 233 30 284 181 263 68 154 90 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1485 1841 1796 1515 1515 1752 1752 1811 1618 1767 1767 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 133 58 1013 276 253 33 253 275 0 74 167 98 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 28 4 7 26 26 10 10 6 19 9 9
Cap, veh/h 161 598 1571 308 528 69 283 503 91 176 103
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.40 0.40 0.17 0.29 0.00 0.06 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1485 2745 3319 1313 171 1668 1752 1535 1541 1044 613 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 133 58 1013 276 0 286 253 275 0 74 0 265 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1485 1373 1659 0 1484 1668 1752 1535 1541 0 1656 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.1 2.6 26.7 8.8 0.0 15.2 15.8 14.2 0.0 5.1 0.0 16.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.1 2.6 26.7 8.8 0.0 15.2 15.8 14.2 0.0 5.1 0.0 16.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.37
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 161 598 1571 308 0 597 283 503 91 0 280 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.10 0.64 0.90 0.00 0.48 0.89 0.55 0.81 0.00 0.95 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 265 598 1571 308 0 597 337 503 169 0 280 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.4 19.8 15.5 47.8 0.0 23.6 43.3 32.1 0.0 49.6 0.0 43.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.1 0.3 2.1 25.9 0.0 2.7 22.4 4.2 0.0 6.4 0.0 41.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.7 1.0 7.8 4.6 0.0 5.5 8.0 6.3 0.0 2.1 0.0 10.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.6 20.1 17.5 73.8 0.0 26.3 65.7 36.4 0.0 56.0 0.0 85.6 LnGrp LOS D C B E A C E D E A F
Approach Vol, veh/h 1204 562 528 A 339
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.4 49.6 50.5 79.1
Approach LOS C D D E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.6 48.2 22.6 22.2 13.7 48.1 10.0 34.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 4.5 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 3.7 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.9 42.9 21.5 * 18 16.4 36.4 11.7 * 29 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.8 28.7 17.8 18.9 10.1 17.2 7.1 16.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.2 0.0 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 40.7
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Service Life PP (2035)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 29 403 607 670 239 247 182 30 256 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.07 0.33 0.84 0.89 0.92 0.89 0.36 0.38 0.94 Control Delay 103.0 31.7 17.6 56.3 46.0 87.6 81.7 7.4 67.1 88.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 103.0 31.7 17.6 56.3 46.0 87.6 81.7 7.4 67.1 88.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 67 16 97 233 467 192 197 1 23 185 Queue Length 95th (ft) #159 42 147 287 #709 #350 #353 59 55 #351 Internal Link Dist (ft) 526 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 285 135 30 125 200
Base Capacity (vph) 111 387 1251 862 751 268 276 508 89 272 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.78 0.07 0.32 0.70 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.36 0.34 0.94 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Service Life PP (2035)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 80 27 371 558 551 65 305 142 167 28 153 83 Future Volume (veh/h) 80 27 371 558 551 65 305 142 167 28 153 83 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1500 1085 1589 1870 1693 1693 1752 1781 1485 1263 1752 1752 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 87 29 403 607 599 71 243 279 0 30 166 90 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 27 55 21 2 14 14 10 8 28 43 10 10
Cap, veh/h 104 362 1172 676 677 80 269 517 45 171 93
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.33 0.33 0.20 0.46 0.46 0.16 0.29 0.00 0.04 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow, veh/h 1428 1085 2370 3456 1485 176 1668 1781 1259 1203 1068 579 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 87 29 403 607 0 670 243 279 0 30 0 256 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1428 1085 1185 1728 0 1661 1668 1781 1259 1203 0 1648 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.1 2.2 12.2 20.2 0.0 43.3 16.8 15.5 0.0 2.9 0.0 18.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.1 2.2 12.2 20.2 0.0 43.3 16.8 15.5 0.0 2.9 0.0 18.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 104 362 1172 676 0 758 269 517 45 0 263 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.08 0.34 0.90 0.00 0.88 0.90 0.54 0.67 0.00 0.97 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 113 362 1172 878 0 758 291 517 86 0 263 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.9 26.9 18.1 46.2 0.0 29.2 48.5 35.1 0.0 56.0 0.0 49.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 35.1 0.4 0.8 8.6 0.0 14.2 28.4 4.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 48.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.6 0.6 3.3 9.2 0.0 19.0 8.9 7.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 11.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 89.0 27.3 18.9 54.8 0.0 43.4 76.9 39.1 0.0 62.3 0.0 98.1 LnGrp LOS F C B D A D E D E A F
Approach Vol, veh/h 519 1277 522 A 286
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.1 48.8 56.7 94.4
Approach LOS C D E F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.7 44.5 23.4 23.0 12.3 59.0 8.1 38.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 4.5 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 3.7 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.9 33.1 20.5 * 19 9.3 53.7 8.4 * 32 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.2 14.2 18.8 20.2 9.1 45.3 4.9 17.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 51.9
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Service Life PP (2035)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 62 1091 362 308 266 278 351 79 285 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.17 0.78 0.76 0.74 0.78 0.77 0.43 0.58 0.76 Control Delay 76.2 38.7 28.2 58.6 50.3 58.3 57.0 4.5 68.0 53.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 76.2 38.7 28.2 58.6 50.3 58.3 57.0 4.5 68.0 53.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 105 37 362 138 213 197 206 0 59 190 Queue Length 95th (ft) #198 80 488 188 #354 302 310 62 110 #334 Internal Link Dist (ft) 526 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 285 135 30 125 200
Base Capacity (vph) 213 360 1499 589 417 404 360 813 182 373 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.67 0.17 0.73 0.61 0.74 0.66 0.77 0.43 0.43 0.76 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Service Life PP (2035)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 131 57 1004 333 251 32 306 194 323 73 166 97 Future Volume (veh/h) 131 57 1004 333 251 32 306 194 323 73 166 97 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1485 1841 1796 1515 1515 1752 1752 1811 1618 1767 1767 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 62 1091 362 273 35 272 296 0 79 180 105 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 28 4 7 26 26 10 10 6 19 9 9
Cap, veh/h 170 384 1211 427 380 49 304 693 97 281 164
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.40 0.00 0.06 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1485 2745 3319 1316 169 1668 1752 1535 1541 1046 610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 142 62 1091 362 0 308 272 296 0 79 0 285 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1485 1373 1659 0 1484 1668 1752 1535 1541 0 1657 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.9 3.5 28.4 11.7 0.0 20.4 17.5 13.5 0.0 5.6 0.0 16.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.9 3.5 28.4 11.7 0.0 20.4 17.5 13.5 0.0 5.6 0.0 16.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.37
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 170 384 1211 427 0 429 304 693 97 0 445 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.16 0.90 0.85 0.00 0.72 0.89 0.43 0.81 0.00 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 225 384 1211 620 0 429 449 693 192 0 445 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.6 31.5 28.4 46.7 0.0 35.0 43.8 24.1 0.0 50.8 0.0 35.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.6 0.9 10.9 5.1 0.0 9.9 14.6 1.9 0.0 6.1 0.0 6.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.5 1.4 14.0 5.0 0.0 8.2 8.2 5.7 0.0 2.3 0.0 7.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 63.2 32.4 39.3 51.9 0.0 44.9 58.4 26.0 0.0 56.8 0.0 42.3 LnGrp LOS E C D D A D E C E A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1295 670 568 A 364
Approach Delay, s/veh 41.6 48.7 41.5 45.4
Approach LOS D D D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.8 33.7 24.5 33.7 14.5 37.0 10.6 47.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 4.5 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 3.7 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 25.5 29.5 * 27 14.3 31.7 13.7 * 43 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.7 30.4 19.5 18.7 10.9 22.4 7.6 15.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.1 0.9 0.0 1.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.7
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave After Interchange Opens PP (2036) 1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 77 23 297 474 450 225 232 111 10 130 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.08 0.27 0.75 0.76 0.80 0.77 0.18 0.10 0.38 Control Delay 59.2 29.3 14.8 41.9 36.0 55.6 51.5 2.0 41.0 31.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 59.2 29.3 14.8 41.9 36.0 55.6 51.5 2.0 41.0 31.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 43 10 53 132 227 127 130 0 5 57
Queue Length 95th (ft) #102 32 88 179 #389 #240 #236 15 22 111 Internal Link Dist (ft) 526 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 285 135 30 125 200
Base Capacity (vph) 137 283 1168 770 589 318 303 611 103 340 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.08 0.25 0.62 0.76 0.71 0.77 0.18 0.10 0.38 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave After Interchange Opens PP (2036) 1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 71 21 273 436 336 78 272 148 102 9 90 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 71 21 273 436 336 78 272 148 102 9 90 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1500 1085 1589 1870 1693 1693 1752 1781 1485 1263 1752 1752 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 77 23 297 474 365 85 228 255 0 10 98 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 27 55 21 2 14 14 10 8 28 43 10 10
Cap, veh/h 100 282 993 565 469 109 266 634 21 258 84
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.16 0.35 0.35 0.16 0.36 0.00 0.02 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1428 1085 2370 3456 1328 309 1668 1781 1259 1203 1265 413 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 77 23 297 474 0 450 228 255 0 10 0 130 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1428 1085 1185 1728 0 1637 1668 1781 1259 1203 0 1677 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.4 1.3 6.9 11.1 0.0 20.4 11.1 8.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.4 1.3 6.9 11.1 0.0 20.4 11.1 8.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 5.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 100 282 993 565 0 579 266 634 21 0 343 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.08 0.30 0.84 0.00 0.78 0.86 0.40 0.48 0.00 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 143 282 993 802 0 579 353 634 101 0 343 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.0 23.3 16.0 33.7 0.0 24.0 34.0 20.1 0.0 40.5 0.0 28.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.6 0.6 0.8 3.9 0.0 9.9 14.7 1.9 0.0 6.2 0.0 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.4 1.8 4.6 0.0 8.7 5.3 3.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.6 23.8 16.8 37.6 0.0 33.9 48.8 22.0 0.0 46.7 0.0 31.7 LnGrp LOS D C B D A C D C D A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 397 924 483 A 140
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.0 35.8 34.7 32.8
Approach LOS C D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.3 26.9 17.8 21.2 9.5 34.7 5.1 33.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 4.5 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 3.7 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.3 18.4 17.6 * 17 8.3 29.4 7.0 * 28 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.1 8.9 13.1 7.6 6.4 22.4 2.7 10.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.7
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave After Interchange Opens PP (2036) 1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 28 635 220 217 126 130 220 39 145 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.06 0.45 0.58 0.41 0.56 0.54 0.33 0.30 0.41 Control Delay 46.0 23.5 14.3 42.3 25.1 43.9 42.3 4.9 45.1 28.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.0 23.5 14.3 42.3 25.1 43.9 42.3 4.9 45.1 28.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 41 11 122 60 91 68 70 0 21 54
Queue Length 95th (ft) 84 32 165 96 163 125 127 50 53 117 Internal Link Dist (ft) 526 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 285 135 30 125 200
Base Capacity (vph) 208 456 1548 478 528 305 240 670 131 355 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.06 0.41 0.46 0.41 0.41 0.54 0.33 0.30 0.41 Intersection Summary
US 101 SB at Terven Ave After Interchange Opens PP (2036) 1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 70 26 584 202 170 29 140 96 202 36 86 48 Future Volume (veh/h) 70 26 584 202 170 29 140 96 202 36 86 48 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1485 1841 1796 1515 1515 1752 1752 1811 1618 1767 1767 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 76 28 635 220 185 32 128 138 0 39 93 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 28 4 7 26 26 10 10 6 19 9 9
Cap, veh/h 121 470 1132 300 423 73 160 592 77 300 168
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.10 0.34 0.00 0.05 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1485 2745 3319 1258 218 1668 1752 1535 1541 1064 595 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 76 28 635 220 0 217 128 138 0 39 0 145 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1485 1373 1659 0 1476 1668 1752 1535 1541 0 1659 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 1.1 14.6 5.3 0.0 9.4 6.2 4.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 5.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 1.1 14.6 5.3 0.0 9.4 6.2 4.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 5.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 121 470 1132 300 0 497 160 592 77 0 468 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.06 0.56 0.73 0.00 0.44 0.80 0.23 0.50 0.00 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 216 470 1132 496 0 497 334 592 137 0 468 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.2 19.6 18.5 36.5 0.0 21.2 36.4 19.6 0.0 38.1 0.0 23.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 0.2 2.0 1.3 0.0 2.8 8.8 0.9 0.0 1.9 0.0 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 0.4 4.4 2.1 0.0 3.3 2.8 1.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.2 19.8 20.5 37.8 0.0 24.0 45.2 20.5 0.0 40.0 0.0 24.9 LnGrp LOS D B C D A C D C D A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 739 437 266 A 184
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.4 30.9 32.4 28.1
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.1 31.3 12.4 27.4 9.5 33.0 7.8 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 4.5 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 3.7 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.3 25.7 16.5 * 18 10.3 27.7 7.3 * 28 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.3 16.6 8.2 7.7 5.5 11.4 4.0 6.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 1.3 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Design Life PP (2045)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 83 25 317 504 482 240 248 117 11 138 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.09 0.29 0.77 0.79 0.86 0.83 0.19 0.11 0.41 Control Delay 68.4 29.3 15.5 42.1 36.6 64.9 59.3 2.4 41.3 32.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 68.4 29.3 15.5 42.1 36.6 64.9 59.3 2.4 41.3 32.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 11 59 140 242 140 143 0 6 61
Queue Length 95th (ft) #119 33 96 188 #413 #274 #274 18 23 117 Internal Link Dist (ft) 526 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 285 135 30 125 200
Base Capacity (vph) 125 284 1131 795 610 294 298 604 101 335 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.66 0.09 0.28 0.63 0.79 0.82 0.83 0.19 0.11 0.41 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Design Life PP (2045)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 76 23 292 464 360 84 291 158 108 10 96 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 76 23 292 464 360 84 291 158 108 10 96 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1500 1085 1589 1870 1693 1693 1752 1781 1485 1263 1752 1752 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 83 25 317 504 391 91 244 273 0 11 104 34 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 27 55 21 2 14 14 10 8 28 43 10 10
Cap, veh/h 100 281 1010 592 479 111 279 632 23 249 81
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.17 0.36 0.36 0.17 0.35 0.00 0.02 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1428 1085 2370 3456 1328 309 1668 1781 1259 1203 1264 413 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 83 25 317 504 0 482 244 273 0 11 0 138 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1428 1085 1185 1728 0 1637 1668 1781 1259 1203 0 1677 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 1.5 7.6 12.2 0.0 23.0 12.3 10.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 6.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 1.5 7.6 12.2 0.0 23.0 12.3 10.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 6.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 100 281 1010 592 0 590 279 632 23 0 331 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.09 0.31 0.85 0.00 0.82 0.88 0.43 0.49 0.00 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 128 281 1010 809 0 590 319 632 98 0 331 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.6 24.2 16.4 34.7 0.0 25.0 35.0 21.2 0.0 41.9 0.0 30.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.9 0.6 0.8 4.9 0.0 11.9 20.8 2.1 0.0 5.9 0.0 3.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.4 2.0 5.2 0.0 10.0 6.3 4.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 2.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 63.5 24.9 17.2 39.6 0.0 36.9 55.9 23.4 0.0 47.8 0.0 34.1 LnGrp LOS E C B D A D E C D A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 425 986 517 A 149
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.7 38.3 38.7 35.2
Approach LOS C D D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.5 27.7 18.9 21.2 9.7 36.4 5.3 34.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 4.5 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 3.7 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.2 18.6 16.5 * 17 7.7 31.1 7.0 * 27 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.2 9.6 14.3 8.2 6.9 25.0 2.8 12.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.8
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Design Life PP (2045)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
Queues Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 82 30 684 261 232 132 137 236 41 165 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.06 0.79 0.82 0.45 0.70 0.67 0.36 0.29 0.44 Control Delay 42.5 18.6 31.8 55.0 22.8 52.9 49.3 5.1 37.4 24.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 42.5 18.6 31.8 55.0 22.8 52.9 49.3 5.1 37.4 24.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 10 163 62 82 63 65 0 18 53
Queue Length 95th (ft) 79 28 #255 #123 148 #143 #142 50 48 109 Internal Link Dist (ft) 526 427 121 526
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 285 135 30 125 200
Base Capacity (vph) 173 467 861 320 517 198 203 653 142 371 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.06 0.79 0.82 0.45 0.67 0.67 0.36 0.29 0.44 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

US 101 SB at Terven Ave Design Life PP (2045)
1: Terven Ave/Terven Avenue & Airport Boulevard/US 101 SB Ramps PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 10 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 75 28 629 240 182 31 148 99 217 38 101 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 75 28 629 240 182 31 148 99 217 38 101 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1485 1841 1796 1515 1515 1752 1752 1811 1618 1767 1767 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 82 30 684 261 198 34 134 145 0 41 110 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 28 4 7 26 26 10 10 6 19 9 9
Cap, veh/h 134 480 887 333 435 75 166 508 84 260 130
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.29 0.00 0.05 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1485 2745 3319 1259 216 1668 1752 1535 1541 1111 556 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 82 30 684 261 0 232 134 145 0 41 0 165 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1485 1373 1659 0 1476 1668 1752 1535 1541 0 1667 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.3 1.0 16.3 5.6 0.0 8.9 5.7 4.7 0.0 1.9 0.0 6.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.3 1.0 16.3 5.6 0.0 8.9 5.7 4.7 0.0 1.9 0.0 6.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 134 480 887 333 0 510 166 508 84 0 389 V/C Ratio(X) 0.61 0.06 0.77 0.78 0.00 0.46 0.81 0.29 0.49 0.00 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 180 480 887 333 0 510 218 508 148 0 389 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.5 17.0 22.2 32.0 0.0 18.5 32.1 20.0 0.0 33.4 0.0 23.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.7 0.3 6.4 10.6 0.0 2.9 15.2 1.4 0.0 1.7 0.0 3.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.4 0.4 5.4 2.6 0.0 3.1 2.8 1.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.1 17.3 28.6 42.6 0.0 21.4 47.2 21.4 0.0 35.1 0.0 27.1 LnGrp LOS C B C D A C D C D A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 796 493 279 A 206
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.8 32.6 33.8 28.7
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.0 28.8 11.8 21.2 9.4 30.4 7.6 25.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 5.3 4.5 * 4.2 3.7 5.3 3.7 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.3 23.5 9.5 * 17 7.6 23.2 7.0 * 20 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.6 18.3 7.7 8.1 5.3 10.9 3.9 6.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.6
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021
Appendix E
Roundabout SIDRA Operational Analysis

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Alt01a_2025AM_US101 SB @ Airport Blvd_DL (Site Folder: General)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Created: Thursday, January 28, 2021 5:07:37 PM Project: K:\SAC_TPTO\City of Salinas, ICE - SB 101 Ramps at Terven Ave\03 Analysis Files\Sidra Files\SB101 at Terven_RAB.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Alt01a_2025AM_US101 SB @ Airport Blvd (Site
Folder: General)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d451 9.4 1098 0.411 100 7.6 LOS A 2.1 55.9 Full 820 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 109 28.0 1029 0.106 100 4.4 LOS A 0.3 10.4 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 560 13.0 0.411 7.0 LOS A 2.1 55.9
East: WB US 101 SB Off-Ramp
Lane 1d597 3.5 840 0.711 100 17.7 LOS C 7.9 202.2 Full 615 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 548 12.6 771 0.711 100 18.9 LOS C 7.2 197.8 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 1146 7.8 0.711 18.3 LOS C 7.9 202.2
North: SB Terven Ave
Lane 1d267 14.1 358 0.748 100 38.4 LOS E 4.2 115.9 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 267 14.1 0.748 38.4 LOS E 4.2 115.9
West: EB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d108 34.1 537 0.200 100 9.4 LOS A 0.6 18.2 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 375 21.0 1384 0.271 100 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Approach 483 23.9 0.271 2.2 LOS A 0.6 18.2
Intersection 2455 12.8 0.748 14.7 LOS B 7.9 202.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Alt01a_2025PM_US101 SB @ Airport Blvd (Site
Folder: General)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d505 10.0 980 0.515 100 10.1 LOS B 3.1 84.8 Full 820 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 286 6.0 1156 0.247 100 5.4 LOS A 1.1 29.0 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 791 8.6 0.515 8.4 LOS A 3.1 84.8
East: WB US 101 SB Off-Ramp
Lane 1d302 8.6 724 0.417 100 10.6 LOS B 2.0 53.9 Full 615 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 260 25.6 625 0.417 100 11.9 LOS B 1.7 51.7 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 562 16.5 0.417 11.2 LOS B 2.0 53.9
North: SB Terven Ave
Lane 1d339 19.3 542 0.625 100 20.2 LOS C 3.6 103.9 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 339 19.3 0.625 20.2 LOS C 3.6 103.9
West: EB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d190 12.7 753 0.253 100 7.7 LOS A 0.9 25.7 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 1013 4.0 1610 0.629 100 0.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Approach 1203 5.4 0.629 1.5 LOS A 0.9 25.7
Intersection 2896 10.0 0.629 7.3 LOS A 3.6 103.9
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Alt01a_2035AM_US101 SB @ Airport Blvd (Site
Folder: General)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d486 9.4 1083 0.449 100 8.2 LOS A 2.4 63.2 Full 820 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 182 28.0 1023 0.177 100 5.2 LOS A 0.6 18.6 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 667 14.4 0.449 7.4 LOS A 2.4 63.2
East: WB US 101 SB Off-Ramp
Lane 1d667 3.1 810 0.823 100 25.6 LOS D 12.4 316.7 Full 615 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 609 12.6 741 0.823 100 27.4 LOS D 11.3 310.5 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 1276 7.6 0.823 26.5 LOS D 12.4 316.7
North: SB Terven Ave
Lane 1d287 14.1 313 0.917 100 68.9 LOS F 7.5 207.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 287 14.1 0.917 68.9 LOS F 7.5 207.8
West: EB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d116 34.1 491 0.237 100 10.8 LOS B 0.7 21.4 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 403 21.0 1384 0.291 100 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Approach 520 23.9 0.291 2.5 LOS A 0.7 21.4
Intersection 2750 13.0 0.917 21.7 LOS C 12.4 316.7
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Alt01a_2035PM_US101 SB @ Airport Blvd (Site
Folder: General)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d543 10.0 961 0.566 100 11.3 LOS B 4.5 121.9 Full 820 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 351 6.0 1144 0.307 100 6.1 LOS A 1.5 38.1 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 895 8.4 0.566 9.3 LOS A 4.5 121.9
East: WB US 101 SB Off-Ramp
Lane 1d362 7.0 700 0.517 100 13.1 LOS B 3.1 81.5 Full 615 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 308 25.7 596 0.516 100514.9 LOS B 2.6 78.4 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 670 15.6 0.517 14.0 LOS B 3.1 81.5
North: SB Terven Ave
Lane 1d365 19.3 480 0.761 100 31.4 LOS D 5.3 154.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 365 19.3 0.761 31.4 LOS D 5.3 154.2
West: EB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d204 12.7 680 0.301 100 9.1 LOS A 1.1 30.6 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 1091 4.0 1610 0.678 100 0.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Approach 1296 5.4 0.678 1.7 LOS A 1.1 30.6
Intersection 3225 9.9 0.761 9.6 LOS A 5.3 154.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 5 Lane under-utilisation found by the program
d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Thursday, January 28, 2021 4:57:24 PM Project: K:\SAC_TPTO\City of Salinas, ICE - SB 101 Ramps at Terven Ave\03 Analysis Files\Sidra Files\SB101 at Terven_RAB.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Alt01a_2036AM_US101 SB @ Airport Blvd (Site
Folder: General)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d457 9.3 1136 0.402 100 7.3 LOS A 2.1 55.2 Full 820 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 111 28.0 1061 0.105 100 4.3 LOS A 0.3 10.4 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 567 13.0 0.402 6.7 LOS A 2.1 55.2
East: WB US 101 SB Off-Ramp
Lane 1d483 2.2 851 0.567 100 12.5 LOS B 4.3 110.1 Full 615 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 441 11.7 778 0.567 100 13.4 LOS B 3.9 107.2 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 924 6.7 0.567 12.9 LOS B 4.3 110.1
North: SB Terven Ave
Lane 1d139 12.8 460 0.303 100 12.7 LOS B 1.0 27.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 139 12.8 0.303 12.7 LOS B 1.0 27.8
West: EB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d100 33.4 614 0.163 100 7.8 LOS A 0.5 15.0 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 297 21.0 1384 0.214 100 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Approach 397 24.1 0.214 2.0 LOS A 0.5 15.0
Intersection 2027 12.3 0.567 9.0 LOS A 4.3 110.1
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Alt01a_2036PM_US101 SB @ Airport Blvd (Site
Folder: General)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d257 10.0 1113 0.231 100 5.4 LOS A 1.0 26.2 Full 820 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 220 6.0 1242 0.177 100 4.4 LOS A 0.8 19.7 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 476 8.2 0.231 4.9 LOS A 1.0 26.2
East: WB US 101 SB Off-Ramp
Lane 1d235 8.2 981 0.239 100 6.0 LOS A 0.9 24.6 Full 615 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 201 25.5 841 0.239 100 6.8 LOS A 0.8 23.1 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 436 16.2 0.239 6.3 LOS A 0.9 24.6
North: SB Terven Ave
Lane 1d185 19.0 709 0.261 100 8.1 LOS A 0.8 24.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 185 19.0 0.261 8.1 LOS A 0.8 24.2
West: EB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d104 12.0 895 0.117 100 5.1 LOS A 0.4 11.4 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 635 4.0 1610 0.394 100 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Approach 739 5.1 0.394 0.8 LOS A 0.4 11.4
Intersection 1836 9.9 0.394 3.9 LOS A 1.0 26.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Alt01a_2044AM_US101 SB @ Airport Blvd (Site
Folder: General)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d488 9.3 1124 0.434 100 7.8 LOS A 2.3 61.6 Full 820 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 117 28.0 1056 0.111 100 4.4 LOS A 0.4 11.1 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 605 12.9 0.434 7.1 LOS A 2.3 61.6
East: WB US 101 SB Off-Ramp
Lane 1d515 2.3 821 0.628 100 14.6 LOS B 5.4 137.5 Full 615 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 472 11.7 751 0.628 100 15.7 LOS C 4.9 134.1 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 987 6.8 0.628 15.1 LOS C 5.4 137.5
North: SB Terven Ave
Lane 1d149 12.9 429 0.347 100 14.6 LOS B 1.2 33.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 149 12.9 0.347 14.6 LOS B 1.2 33.4
West: EB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d108 33.5 592 0.182 100 8.3 LOS A 0.5 16.7 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 317 21.0 1384 0.229 100 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Approach 425 24.2 0.229 2.2 LOS A 0.5 16.7
Intersection 2166 12.3 0.628 10.3 LOS B 5.4 137.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Alt01a_2044PM_US101 SB @ Airport Blvd (Site
Folder: General)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d268 10.0 1101 0.244 100 5.5 LOS A 1.0 27.9 Full 820 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 236 6.0 1236 0.191 100 4.6 LOS A 0.8 21.6 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 504 8.1 0.244 5.1 LOS A 1.0 27.9
East: WB US 101 SB Off-Ramp
Lane 1d266 7.3 970 0.274 100 6.4 LOS A 1.1 28.8 Full 615 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 227 25.6 828 0.274 100 7.3 LOS A 0.9 27.1 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 492 15.7 0.274 6.8 LOS A 1.1 28.8
North: SB Terven Ave
Lane 1d207 18.5 671 0.308 100 9.2 LOS A 1.0 29.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 207 18.5 0.308 9.2 LOS A 1.0 29.0
West: EB Airport Blvd
Lane 1d112 12.0 844 0.133 100 5.6 LOS A 0.5 12.9 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 684 4.0 1610 0.425 100 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 1200 0.0 0.0 Approach 796 5.1 0.425 0.9 LOS A 0.5 12.9
Intersection 1999 9.9 0.425 4.2 LOS A 1.1 29.0
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Thursday, January 28, 2021 4:57:28 PM Project: K:\SAC_TPTO\City of Salinas, ICE - SB 101 Ramps at Terven Ave\03 Analysis Files\Sidra Files\SB101 at Terven_RAB.sip9 ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021
Appendix F
Preliminary Concept Layouts for Improved Traffic Signal and Roundabout 1/29/2021
EXHIBIT 1
1" : 60'
SCALE
Concept Layout of Improved Traffic Signal
US 101 SB Ramps at Terven Avenue/Airport Boulevard Concepts Airport Blvd
AirportBlvd
T
e
rve
n
A
ve
US 101 On-Ramp
US 101 Off-Ramp
1" : 60'
SCALE
Airport Blvd
AirportBlvd
T
e
rve
n
A
ve
US101On-Ramp
US101Off-Ramp
1/29/2021
EXHIBIT 2
Concept Layout of Proposed Roundabout
US 101 SB Ramps at Terven Avenue/Airport Boulevard Concepts ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021
Appendix G
Description of Benefit Cost Performance Measures and Caltrans Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021

BACKGROUND ON BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS
The ICE Analysis is based on the results of a B/C analysis, which is an objective, data-driven calculation that helps inform investment decisions when stakeholders are evaluating intersection control improvements.

The calculations identify cost effective improvements considering the full lifecycle of the improvement, typically 20 years.

Five performance metrics are typically evaluated for proposed conceptual control types at each study location to determine the B/C ratio. The metrics include:
· Safety – measuring the societal cost associated with the predicted number and severity of collisions.
· Delay – measuring the societal cost associated with the number of person-hours of delay. · Emissions – measuring the societal cost associated with the exposure to health-based pollutants emitted by motor vehicles.
· Operations and Maintenance – measuring common annualized costs associated with operating and maintaining the intersection control.
· Initial Capital Costs – measuring the capital costs needed to plan, design, and construct the intersection improvement. The capital costs include construction, capital support, and right of way.

Benefit Performance Measures
The following performance measures are used to calculate the benefit, or cost savings, of the proposed intersection control improvement compared to the existing condition. For each performance measure, the proposed improvement provides a benefit if the calculated life-cycle cost of the proposed improvement is less than the life-cycle cost of the existing condition. The magnitude of the benefit is the difference between the life-cycle cost of the existing condition less the life-cycle cost of the proposed improvement.

Safety
Safety measures the societal cost associated with the predicted number and severity of collisions that may occur for the existing and each proposed intersection control type. The number of predicted collisions was calculated using Highway Safety Manual predictive methods and crash modification factors (CMF). Since CMFs and Safety Performance Functions (SPF) are statistical models based on historical crash data, the safety cost is only a prediction of crash severity distribution and does not perfectly represent the future crash data.

Delay
Delay measures the societal cost associated with the number of person-hours of delay at the intersection during the study period. Consistent with the Caltrans Vehicle Operation Cost Parameters 2020, vehicle occupancy of 1.15 is used to convert delay to person-hours of delay at a value of $19.70 per vehicle-hour of delay, which is the weighted-average of automobile and truck.

Emissions
The emissions performance measure calculates the societal cost associated with exposure to health-based pollutants emitted by motor vehicles. Pollutant emissions are running emissions based on the average speed of vehicles traveling through the intersection during the study period. Pollutant emissions evaluated include reactive organic gasses (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter (PM10). The societal cost of emissions is calculated using emission data from the California Air Resource Board (CARB) Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects, Table 4 Emission Factors by Speed, ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021
September 2019 and cost per ton data from Caltrans Vehicle Operation Cost Parameters 2020 for emissions (Note: VOC is assumed to be synonymous with ROG).

Cost Performance Measures
The following performance measures are used to calculate the added cost of the proposed intersection control improvements compared to the existing control. For each performance measure, the proposed improvements add to the cost of the intersection if the calculated life-cycle cost of the proposed improvement is greater than the life-cycle cost of existing condition. The magnitude of the cost is the difference between the life-cycle cost of the proposed improvement less the life-cycle cost of the existing condition.

Operations and Maintenance (O&M)
The operations and maintenance performance measure incorporate common annualized costs associated with operating and maintaining the proposed type of intersection control. Common costs include signal timing and maintenance, power consumption for signal operations and intersection illumination, landscape maintenance, and pavement rehabilitation. Average annualized costs were used.

Initial Capital Costs
The initial capital costs performance measure estimates the capital costs needed to plan, design, and construct the proposed intersection improvement. The capital costs include construction, capital support, and right of way.

As described in the United States Department of Transportation’s Benefit-Cost Analysis Guidance for Discretionary Grant Programs (Jan. 2020 , p. 6), a blend of “localized data with national estimates or industry standards to complete a more robust analysis” can be applied. The default parameters for the 2020 INFRA Cal-B/C tool are a blend of California and national values assessed at a 2018 base year.

Users should revise default parameters if more applicable values exist for a project being assessed. Revisions can be made within the “Parameters” tab of the Excel workbook by entering a new value into the individual cell. In addition, assumptions identified in the “Project Information” tab (red or blue cells) can be adjusted based for a specific project, e.g., average vehicle occupancy, percent truck, roadway type, etc. The table below is a comparison of California and national values—assumed 2020 INFRA Cal-B/C values are highlighted in yellow.

Parameters Cal-B/C Values Fed. Values Notes
Current Dollar Value applied
in tool 2018 2018
All assumed Cal-B/C parameters are adjusted for 2018 dollars.

Assumed Cal-B/C values in the model have been escalated to 2018 dollars, as recommended in the guidance.

Real Discount Rate 4.00% 7.00% A sensitivity analysis of 3% is no longer required.

Average Vehicle Occupancy

1.67 Cal-B/C factors in peak and non-peak average vehicle occupancy, whereas the federal guidance uses a single AVO figure. Thus, the default values apply to California statewide average.

Non-peak – 1.3
Peak – 1.15
Period of analysis Construction, plus 20
years after completion.

Construction, plus 20 years
after completion in most
situations.

Federal guidance suggests applying no more than 30 years for analytical purposes after project completion.

Travel Time Parameters
Statewide Average Hourly
Wage ($/hr.) $28.44 California values extracted from BLS data.

Heavy and Light Truck
Drivers Average Hourly
Wage ($/hr.)
$21.20 California values extracted from BLS data.

Heavy and Light Truck
Drivers Benefits and Costs
($/hr.)
$11.08 California values extracted from BLS data.

Automobile/Personal
($/hr./per) $14.20 $15.20
For calculation methodology, see Cal-B/C tech doc. (Volume 4), pp. II-37 to II-38.

Link : https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/transportation-planning/documents/f0009451- cal-bctechsupplementvol4v4-a11y.pdf
Truck/Business ($/hr./veh.) $32.30 $29.50
For calculation methodology, see Cal-B/C tech doc. (Volume 4), pp. II-37 to II-38.

Link: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/transportation-planning/documents/f0009451- cal-bctechsupplementvol4v4-a11y.pdf
Auto & Truck
Composite/All Purpose
($/hr./veh)
$19.70 $25.55
Federal weighted average based on a typical distribution of local travel by surface modes (95.4% personal, 4.6% truck). California assumes a different distribution (91% personal, 9% truck). Applicants should apply their own distribution of business versus personal travel if available.

Transit/Transit Rail
Operators ($/hr./per) $14.20 (passenger)
$15.20 (local personal
travel) Cal-B/C only values “transit” per passenger. Federal guidance states, for wait times, the value should be doubled. Values for personal travel based on local travel values and intercity personal travel are described in US DOT’s Value of Travel Time guidance. A valuation of the “transit operator” is also not a factor in the Cal-B/C model.
$21.30 (intercity personal
travel)
$50.20 (transit rail
operator)
Average Fuel Price
Automobile (regular
unleaded) ($/gal) $3.31
Fuel prices for gasoline and diesel were extracted the US Energy Information Administration's 2018 Petroleum and Other Liquids annual report.

For calculation methodology, see Cal-B/C tech doc. (Volume 4), pp. II-37 to II-38. pp. II-37 to II-46.

Link: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/transportation-planning/documents/f0009451- cal-bctechsupplementvol4v4-a11y.pdf
Truck (diesel) ($/gal.) $3.44
Fuel prices for gasoline and diesel were extracted the US Energy Information Administration's 2017 Petroleum and Other Liquids annual report.

Link: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/transportation-planning/documents/f0009451- cal-bctechsupplementvol4v4-a11y.pdf
State Sales Tax (gasoline) 2.25% Value is applicable to California.

State Sales Tax (diesel) 13.00% Value is applicable to California.

Average Local Sales Tax 0.50% Value is applicable to California.

Federal Fuel Excise Tax
(gasoline) ($/gal.) $0.184
Federal Fuel Excise Tax
(diesel) ($/gal.) $0.244
State Fuel Excise Tax
(gasoline) ($/gal.) $0.417 Value is applicable to California (current rate increased on 7/19 to $0.473)
State Fuel Excise Tax
(diesel) ($/gal.) $0.36 Value is applicable to California (reflective of Nov. 2017 SB-1 increase) Non-Fuel Cost Per Mile
Automobile $0.326
Federal guidance does not provide an estimate. Non-fuel costs are based on 2016 Cal-B/C estimate and escalated to 2018 using OMB Table

10.1 GDP. Cal-B/C auto value assessed at 3.13 cents (2016) and base value for truck is ATRI (2014) value.

Truck/Light Duty Vehicles $0.434 $0.41
Cal-B/C breaks out fuel and non-fuel costs. US DOT Guidance factors in fuel costs when estimating vehicle operation costs. Truck was escalated using 2018 divided by 2014 indices, as the base year in the model was 2016.

Commercial Trucks $0.96
Cal-B/C breaks out fuel and non-fuel costs for commercial trucks. US DOT Guidance factors in fuel costs, repair, insurance, permits, license, etc.

Accident Cost Parameters
Cost of Fatality/Killed $9.8M $9.6M
Accident costs are based on reported federal benefit-cost guidance rate for 2018. The assumed rate in the 2016 Cal-B/C model differs.

Level A (Severe)/Incapacitating $467,000 $459,100
Accident costs are based on reported federal benefit-cost guidance rate for 2018. The assumed rate in the 2016 Cal-B/C model differs.

Level B (Moderate)/Nonincapacitating $127,100 $125,000 Accident costs are based on reported federal benefit-cost guidance rate for 2018. The assumed rate in the 2016 Cal-B/C model differs.

Level (Minor)/Possible Injury $65,000 $63,900
Accident costs are based on reported federal benefit-cost guidance rate for 2018. The assumed rate in the 2016 Cal-B/C model differs.

Cost of Property Damage (PDO) $4,374 $4,400 Accident costs are based on reported federal benefit-cost guidance rate for 2018. The assumed rate in the 2016 Cal-B/C model differs.

Pollutant Emissions
CO $75 - $160 $0
Cal-B/C estimates are based on Corporate Average Fuel Economy for MY2017-MY2025 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks (August 2012), page 922, Table VIII-16, “Economic Values Used for Benefits Computations (2010 dollars)”. Values are inflated from 2010 dollars to 2016 dollars using the GDP deflator. Cal-B/C rates vary depending on project location. Cal-B/C calculation methodology can be viewed in its tech. doc. vol. 4, pp. II-51 to II-61. Cal-B/C value differs based on geographic three regional categories within California.

Link: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/transportationplanning/documents/f0009451-cal-bctechsupplementvol4v4-a11y.pdf No value identified in the federal guidance document, thus, no value assessed.

CO2 $38 $0.91
USDOT recommends using a monetary value of $1 per metric ton (2018) for the social cost of carbon based on the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021- 2026 report. However, Cal-B/C’s CO2 unit of measurement is in short ton. Thus, the conversion value is $1 per metric divided by 1.1023 short ton equals $0.91.

NOX
$13,900 –
$63,900 $8,600 Cal-B/C value differs based on three regional categories within California.Applied the 2018 federal rate.

PM10
$107,700 –
$523,300 $387,300 Cal-B/C value differs based on three regional categories within California.Applied the 2018 federal rate.

SO2
$54,400 –
$196,600 $50,100 Cal-B/C value differs based on three regional categories within California.Applied the 2018 federal rate.

VOC $1,025 –
$3,970 $2,100 Cal-B/C value differs based on three regional categories within California.Applied the 2018 federal rate.

ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021
Appendix H
HSM Predictive Method Safety Analysis IHSDM KABCO Values US 101 SB Ramps at Terven Ave/Airport Blvd
Year Total K A B C O
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.26% 12.19% 37.57% 47.75%
- - 0.009 0.082 0.444 1.368 1.738
KABC PDO 0.24% 2.27% 12.24% 37.75% 47.50%
- - 0.009 0.087 0.468 1.443 1.816
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.22% 11.97% 36.90% 48.69%
- - 0.006 0.061 0.327 1.009 1.332
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.23% 12.01% 37.02% 48.52%
- - 0.007 0.064 0.343 1.056 1.384
Year Total K A B C O
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.26% 12.19% 37.59% 47.73%
- - 0.009 0.082 0.444 1.369 1.738
KABC PDO 0.24% 2.27% 12.25% 37.76% 47.49%
- - 0.009 0.087 0.468 1.444 1.816
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.22% 11.97% 36.91% 48.67%
- - 0.006 0.061 0.328 1.010 1.332
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.23% 12.01% 37.03% 48.50%
- - 0.007 0.064 0.343 1.057 1.384
Year Total K A B C O
KABC PDO 0.08% 0.80% 4.34% 13.37% 81.40%

0.288 1.379 0.002 0.024 0.128 0.394 2.397
KABC PDO 0.08% 0.81% 4.36% 13.44% 81.31%

0.288 1.385 0.003 0.025 0.135 0.416 2.515
KABC PDO 0.08% 0.79% 4.26% 13.13% 81.73%

0.288 1.358 0.002 0.017 0.094 0.291 1.809
KABC PDO 0.08% 0.79% 4.27% 13.18% 81.67%

0.288 1.362 0.002 0.018 0.099 0.304 1.885
Existing Signal Safety Values
2025 3.64
2036 2.74
2035 3.82
2045 2.85
CMF
2045

2.94 2.31
2045 2.85
Proposed Roundabout Safety Values
CMF
Proposed Signal Safety Values
2035 3.09
2036 2.21
2025
CMF
2025 3.64
2035 3.82
2036 2.74
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
January 29, 2021
Disclaimer
The Interactive Highway Design Model (IHSDM) software is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names may appear in this software and documentation only because they are considered essential to the objective of the software.

Limited Warranty and Limitations of Remedies
This software product is provided "as-is," without warranty of any kind-either expressed or implied (but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose). The FHWA do not warrant that the functions contained in the software will meet the end-user's requirements or that the operation of the software will be uninterrupted and error-free.

Under no circumstances will the FHWA be liable to the end-user for any damages or claimed lost profits, lost savings, or other incidental or consequential damages rising out of the use or inability to use the software (even if these organizations have been advised of the possibility of such damages), or for any claim by any other party.

Notice
The use of the IHSDM software is being done strictly on a voluntary basis. In exchange for provision of IHSDM, the user agrees that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation and any other agency of the Federal Government shall not be responsible for any errors, damage or other liability that may result from any and all use of the software, including installation and testing of the software. The user further agrees to hold the FHWA and the Federal Government harmless from any resulting liability. The user agrees that this hold harmless provision shall flow to any person to whom or any entity to which the user provides the IHSDM software. It is the user's full responsibility to inform any person to whom or any entity to which it provides the IHSDM software of this hold harmless provision.

Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Jan 29, 2021 5:00 PM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Oct 12, 2020 9:15 AM) Evaluation Date: Thu Jan 28 17:48:06 PST 2021
IHSDM Version: v16.0.0 (Sep 30, 2020)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: jared.calise
Organization Name:

Phone:

E-Mail:

Project Title: Salinas ICE - US 101 SB at Terven Ave
Project Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:50:16 PST 2021
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: Existing - Signalized
Site Set Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:53:45 PST 2021
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: Existing - 2025
Evaluation Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 17:47:49 PST 2021 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2025
Last Year of Analysis: 2025
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method

IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT COMPARING RESULTS FROM HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL FIRST EDITION (2010) MODELS TO RESULTS FROM NEW MODELS DEVELOPED UNDER NCHRP PROJECTS 17-70 AND 17-58 Since the publication of the Highway Safety Manual - First Edition (HSM-1), in 2010 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), multiple research efforts have been undertaken through the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) to develop safety performance models for road segment and intersection facility types that were not initially reflected in the HSM-1, in order to expand the breadth and depth of the HSM in the future.

Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Report Overview
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 1
The IHSDM Crash Prediction Module (CPM) is intended as a faithful implementation of HSM Part C predictive methods. As NCHRP projects to develop new predictive methods for the HSM are completed, FHWA works to incorporate the new methods into IHSDM, sometimes in advance of publication in the HSM. The following new crash predictive methods have been accepted by NCHRP project panels and incorporated into IHSDM, while pending AASHTO's approval for incorporation into a future edition of the HSM:
- Roundabouts: completed in 2018 under NCHRP Project 17-70, the new methods will provide improved outcomes for the safety analysis of roundabouts.
- 6+ lane and one-way urban/suburban arterials (including models for segments and intersections): completed under NCHRP Project 17-58.

However, in the absence of local calibration factors (see HSM-1 Part C, Appendix A for guidance on calibration of the predictive models), it is neither appropriate nor advisable to directly compare the results from new models (from NCHRP Projects 17-58 and 17-70) to results from HSM-1 models, as the models were not calibrated to the same base state data sets, and consequently can produce unexpected results. If local calibration factors are available and applied to both new models and HSM-1 models, then it may be appropriate to directly compare the results.[Note: Work being performed under NCHRP Project 17-72 (Update of Crash Modification Factors for the Highway Safety Manual) is expected to re-calibrate many of the old (HSM-1) and new (e.g., NCHRP 17-70) models to data from a single (or small number of) states, that would allow results from all models to be directly compared.]
The models produced for NCHRP Project 17-70 have independent value in terms of informing the design of a roundabout and assessing the effects of different design characteristics on the expected safety performance of a roundabout.

The HSM-1 interim method previously included in IHSDM for evaluating roundabouts on urban/suburban arterials (i.e., evaluating an existing intersection and then applying a Crash Modification Factor for replacing the existing intersection with a roundabout) has been deactivated in IHSDM, to minimize any confusion with the new roundabout methodology.

Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4SG_GE6
Calibration Factor: 1
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT Minor AADT Presence of Lighting Number of Approaches with Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Permissive/Prot ected or Protected/Perm issive Left- Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Protected Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches on which Right Turn on Red is Prohibited Presence of Red-Light Cameras Pedestrian Volumes Crossing all Intersection Legs
(crossings/day) Max. Number of Lanes Crossed
by Pedestrians Number of Bus Stops within 1000ft of Intersection Number of Schools within 1000 ft of Intersection Number of Alcohol Sales Establishments within 1000 ft of Intersection 1 4SG2x2ge6 Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2025: 20680 2025: 17140 yes 0 0 4 0 no 50 4 0 0 1 Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site Site No. Type Highway Site Description Total Predicted Crashes for Evaluation Period Predicted Total Crash Frequency (crashes/yr) Predicted FI Crash Frequency(crashes/yr) Predicted PDO Crash Frequency
(crashes/yr) Predicted Intersection Travel Crash Rate
(crashes/million veh) Intersection Crash Rate (crashes/yr) 1 4SG Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 3.640 3.6402 1.9020 1.7382 0.26 3.6402 Total Total 3.640 3.6402 1.9020 1.7382 0.26 3.6402 Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%) 2025 3.64 1.90 52.249 1.74 47.751
Total 3.64 1.90 52.249 1.74 47.751
Average 3.64 1.90 52.249 1.74 47.751
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
independently.

Table 4. Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity
Site No.

Fatal (K)
Crashes
(crashes)
Incapacitating Injury (A)
Crashes (crashes)
Non-Incapacitating Injury
(B) Crashes (crashes)
Possible Injury
(C) Crashes
(crashes)
No Injury
(O) Crashes
(crashes)
1 0.0085 0.0823 0.4436 1.3676 1.7382
Total 0.0085 0.0823 0.4436 1.3676 1.7382
Table 5. Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Angle Collision 1.34 36.8 0.96 26.3 2.30 63.2 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.07 1.8 0.00 0.0 0.07 1.8 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.17 4.6 0.08 2.2 0.25 6.8 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.05 1.4 0.04 1.1 0.09 2.5 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.02 0.6 0.11 2.9 0.13 3.5 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.04 1.0 0.00 0.0 0.04 1.0 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.15 4.1 0.26 7.1 0.41 11.2 Intersection Sideswipe 0.07 1.9 0.30 8.2 0.37 10.0
Intersection Total Intersection Total Vehicle Crashes 1.90 52.3 1.74 47.7 3.64 100.0 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 1.90 52.3 1.74 47.7 3.64 100.0 Total Crashes 1.90 52.3 1.74 47.7 3.64 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.

Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 5
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
January 28, 2021
Disclaimer
The Interactive Highway Design Model (IHSDM) software is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Jan 28, 2021 5:49 PM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Oct 12, 2020 9:15 AM) Evaluation Date: Thu Jan 28 17:48:57 PST 2021
IHSDM Version: v16.0.0 (Sep 30, 2020)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: jared.calise
Organization Name:

Phone:

E-Mail:

Project Title: Salinas ICE - US 101 SB at Terven Ave
Project Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:50:16 PST 2021
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: Existing - Signalized
Site Set Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:53:45 PST 2021
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: Existing - 2035
Evaluation Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 17:48:43 PST 2021 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2035
Last Year of Analysis: 2035
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method

Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4SG_GE6
Calibration Factor: 1
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT Minor AADT Presence of Lighting Number of Approaches with Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Permissive/Prot ected or Protected/Perm issive Left- Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Protected Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches on which Right Turn on Red is Prohibited Presence of Red-Light Cameras Pedestrian Volumes Crossing all Intersection Legs
(crossings/day) Max. Number of Lanes Crossed
by Pedestrians Number of Bus Stops within 1000ft of Intersection Number of Schools within 1000 ft of Intersection Number of Alcohol Sales Establishments within 1000 ft of Intersection 1 4SG2x2ge6 Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2035: 23263 2035: 18466 yes 0 0 4 0 no 50 4 0 0 1 Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site Site No. Type Highway Site Description Total Predicted Crashes for Evaluation Period Predicted Total Crash Frequency (crashes/yr) Predicted FI Crash Frequency(crashes/yr) Predicted PDO Crash Frequency
(crashes/yr) Predicted Intersection Travel Crash Rate
(crashes/million veh) Intersection Crash Rate (crashes/yr) 1 4SG Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 3.823 3.8226 2.0067 1.8159 0.25 3.8226 Total Total 3.823 3.8226 2.0067 1.8159 0.25 3.8226 Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%) 2035 3.82 2.01 52.496 1.82 47.504
Total 3.82 2.01 52.496 1.82 47.504
Average 3.82 2.01 52.496 1.82 47.504
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
independently.

Table 4. Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity
Site No.

Fatal (K)
Crashes
(crashes)
Incapacitating Injury (A)
Crashes (crashes)
Non-Incapacitating Injury
(B) Crashes (crashes)
Possible Injury
(C) Crashes
(crashes)
No Injury
(O) Crashes
(crashes)
1 0.0090 0.0868 0.4680 1.4429 1.8159
Total 0.0090 0.0868 0.4680 1.4429 1.8159
Table 5. Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Angle Collision 1.42 37.0 1.00 26.2 2.42 63.3 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.07 1.8 0.00 0.0 0.07 1.8 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.18 4.6 0.08 2.2 0.26 6.8 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.06 1.4 0.04 1.0 0.10 2.5 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.02 0.6 0.11 2.9 0.13 3.5 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.04 1.0 0.00 0.0 0.04 1.0 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.16 4.1 0.27 7.0 0.43 11.1 Intersection Sideswipe 0.07 1.9 0.31 8.1 0.38 10.0
Intersection Total Intersection Total Vehicle Crashes 2.01 52.5 1.82 47.5 3.82 100.0 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 2.01 52.5 1.82 47.5 3.82 100.0 Total Crashes 2.01 52.5 1.82 47.5 3.82 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.

Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Jan 28, 2021 5:51 PM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Oct 12, 2020 9:15 AM) Evaluation Date: Thu Jan 28 17:51:07 PST 2021
IHSDM Version: v16.0.0 (Sep 30, 2020)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: jared.calise
Organization Name:

Phone:

E-Mail:

Project Title: Salinas ICE - US 101 SB at Terven Ave
Project Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:50:16 PST 2021
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: Existing - Signalized
Site Set Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:53:45 PST 2021
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: Existing - 2036
Evaluation Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 17:50:54 PST 2021 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2036
Last Year of Analysis: 2036
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method

Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4SG_GE6
Calibration Factor: 1
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT Minor AADT Presence of Lighting Number of Approaches with Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Permissive/Prot ected or Protected/Perm issive Left- Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Protected Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches on which Right Turn on Red is Prohibited Presence of Red-Light Cameras Pedestrian Volumes Crossing all Intersection Legs
(crossings/day) Max. Number of Lanes Crossed
by Pedestrians Number of Bus Stops within 1000ft of Intersection Number of Schools within 1000 ft of Intersection Number of Alcohol Sales Establishments within 1000 ft of Intersection 1 4SG2x2ge6 Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2036: 13207 2036: 10385 yes 0 0 4 0 no 50 4 0 0 1 Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site Site No. Type Highway Site Description Total Predicted Crashes for Evaluation Period Predicted Total Crash Frequency (crashes/yr) Predicted FI Crash Frequency(crashes/yr) Predicted PDO Crash Frequency
(crashes/yr) Predicted Intersection Travel Crash Rate
(crashes/million veh) Intersection Crash Rate (crashes/yr) 1 4SG Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2.735 2.7352 1.4035 1.3318 0.32 2.7352 Total Total 2.735 2.7352 1.4035 1.3318 0.32 2.7352 Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%) 2036 2.73 1.40 51.311 1.33 48.689
Total 2.73 1.40 51.311 1.33 48.689
Average 2.73 1.40 51.311 1.33 48.689
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
independently.

Table 4. Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity
Site No.

Fatal (K)
Crashes
(crashes)
Incapacitating Injury (A)
Crashes (crashes)
Non-Incapacitating Injury
(B) Crashes (crashes)
Possible Injury
(C) Crashes
(crashes)
No Injury
(O) Crashes
(crashes)
1 0.0063 0.0607 0.3273 1.0092 1.3318
Total 0.0063 0.0607 0.3273 1.0092 1.3318
Table 5. Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Angle Collision 0.99 36.1 0.73 26.9 1.72 63.0 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.05 1.8 0.00 0.0 0.05 1.8 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.12 4.5 0.06 2.2 0.18 6.7 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.04 1.4 0.03 1.1 0.07 2.5 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.02 0.6 0.08 3.0 0.10 3.5 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.03 1.1 0.00 0.0 0.03 1.1 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.11 4.0 0.20 7.2 0.31 11.2 Intersection Sideswipe 0.05 1.8 0.23 8.3 0.28 10.2
Intersection Total Intersection Total Vehicle Crashes 1.41 51.3 1.33 48.7 2.74 100.0 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 1.41 51.3 1.33 48.7 2.74 100.0 Total Crashes 1.41 51.3 1.33 48.7 2.74 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.

Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Jan 28, 2021 5:52 PM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Oct 12, 2020 9:15 AM) Evaluation Date: Thu Jan 28 17:51:25 PST 2021
IHSDM Version: v16.0.0 (Sep 30, 2020)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: jared.calise
Organization Name:

Phone:

E-Mail:

Project Title: Salinas ICE - US 101 SB at Terven Ave
Project Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:50:16 PST 2021
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: Existing - Signalized
Site Set Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:53:45 PST 2021
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: Existing - 2045
Evaluation Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 17:51:13 PST 2021 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2045
Last Year of Analysis: 2045
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method

Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4SG_GE6
Calibration Factor: 1
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT Minor AADT Presence of Lighting Number of Approaches with Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Permissive/Prot ected or Protected/Perm issive Left- Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Protected Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches on which Right Turn on Red is Prohibited Presence of Red-Light Cameras Pedestrian Volumes Crossing all Intersection Legs
(crossings/day) Max. Number of Lanes Crossed
by Pedestrians Number of Bus Stops within 1000ft of Intersection Number of Schools within 1000 ft of Intersection Number of Alcohol Sales Establishments within 1000 ft of Intersection 1 4SG2x2ge6 Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2045: 14340 2045: 11130 yes 0 0 4 0 no 50 4 0 0 1 Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site Site No. Type Highway Site Description Total Predicted Crashes for Evaluation Period Predicted Total Crash Frequency (crashes/yr) Predicted FI Crash Frequency(crashes/yr) Predicted PDO Crash Frequency
(crashes/yr) Predicted Intersection Travel Crash Rate
(crashes/million veh) Intersection Crash Rate (crashes/yr) 1 4SG Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2.853 2.8525 1.4686 1.3840 0.31 2.8525 Total Total 2.853 2.8525 1.4686 1.3840 0.31 2.8525 Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%) 2045 2.85 1.47 51.483 1.38 48.517
Total 2.85 1.47 51.483 1.38 48.517
Average 2.85 1.47 51.483 1.38 48.517
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
independently.

Table 4. Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity
Site No.

Fatal (K)
Crashes
(crashes)
Incapacitating Injury (A)
Crashes (crashes)
Non-Incapacitating Injury
(B) Crashes (crashes)
Possible Injury
(C) Crashes
(crashes)
No Injury
(O) Crashes
(crashes)
1 0.0066 0.0635 0.3425 1.0560 1.3840
Total 0.0066 0.0635 0.3425 1.0560 1.3840
Table 5. Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Angle Collision 1.03 36.2 0.76 26.8 1.80 63.0 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.05 1.8 0.00 0.0 0.05 1.8 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.13 4.5 0.06 2.2 0.19 6.7 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.04 1.4 0.03 1.1 0.07 2.5 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.02 0.6 0.08 3.0 0.10 3.5 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.03 1.1 0.00 0.0 0.03 1.1 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.12 4.0 0.20 7.2 0.32 11.2 Intersection Sideswipe 0.05 1.8 0.24 8.3 0.29 10.1
Intersection Total Intersection Total Vehicle Crashes 1.47 51.5 1.38 48.5 2.85 100.0 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 1.47 51.5 1.38 48.5 2.85 100.0 Total Crashes 1.47 51.5 1.38 48.5 2.85 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.

Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Jan 28, 2021 6:26 PM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Oct 12, 2020 9:15 AM) Evaluation Date: Thu Jan 28 18:24:40 PST 2021
IHSDM Version: v16.0.0 (Sep 30, 2020)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: jared.calise
Organization Name:

Phone:

E-Mail:

Project Title: Salinas ICE - US 101 SB at Terven Ave
Project Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:50:16 PST 2021
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: Proposed - Signal Alt 2
Site Set Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 17:31:38 PST 2021
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: Proposed
Evaluation Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 18:24:29 PST 2021 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2025
Last Year of Analysis: 2025
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method

Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4SG_GE6
Calibration Factor: 1
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT Minor AADT Presence of Lighting Number of Approaches with Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Permissive/Prot ected or Protected/Perm issive Left- Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Protected Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches on which Right Turn on Red is Prohibited Presence of Red-Light Cameras Pedestrian Volumes Crossing all Intersection Legs
(crossings/day) Max. Number of Lanes Crossed
by Pedestrians Number of Bus Stops within 1000ft of Intersection Number of Schools within 1000 ft of Intersection Number of Alcohol Sales Establishments within 1000 ft of Intersection 1 4SG2x2ge6 Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2025: 20680 2025: 17140 yes 0 0 4 0 no 50 5 0 0 1 Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site Site No. Type Highway Site Description Total Predicted Crashes for Evaluation Period Predicted Total Crash Frequency (crashes/yr) Predicted FI Crash Frequency(crashes/yr) Predicted PDO Crash Frequency
(crashes/yr) Predicted Intersection Travel Crash Rate
(crashes/million veh) Intersection Crash Rate (crashes/yr) 1 4SG Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 3.642 3.6417 1.9034 1.7382 0.26 3.6417 Total Total 3.642 3.6417 1.9034 1.7382 0.26 3.6417 Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%) 2025 3.64 1.90 52.268 1.74 47.732
Total 3.64 1.90 52.268 1.74 47.732
Average 3.64 1.90 52.268 1.74 47.732
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
independently.

Table 4. Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity
Site No.

Fatal (K)
Crashes
(crashes)
Incapacitating Injury (A)
Crashes (crashes)
Non-Incapacitating Injury
(B) Crashes (crashes)
Possible Injury
(C) Crashes
(crashes)
No Injury
(O) Crashes
(crashes)
1 0.0085 0.0823 0.4439 1.3687 1.7382
Total 0.0085 0.0823 0.4439 1.3687 1.7382
Table 5. Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Angle Collision 1.34 36.8 0.96 26.3 2.30 63.2 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.07 1.8 0.00 0.0 0.07 1.8 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.17 4.6 0.08 2.2 0.25 6.8 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.05 1.4 0.04 1.1 0.09 2.5 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.02 0.6 0.11 2.9 0.13 3.5 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.04 1.0 0.00 0.0 0.04 1.0 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.15 4.1 0.26 7.1 0.41 11.2 Intersection Sideswipe 0.07 1.9 0.30 8.2 0.37 10.0
Intersection Total Intersection Total Vehicle Crashes 1.91 52.3 1.74 47.7 3.64 100.0 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 1.91 52.3 1.74 47.7 3.64 100.0 Total Crashes 1.91 52.3 1.74 47.7 3.64 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.

Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Jan 28, 2021 6:26 PM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Oct 12, 2020 9:15 AM) Evaluation Date: Thu Jan 28 18:25:00 PST 2021
IHSDM Version: v16.0.0 (Sep 30, 2020)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: jared.calise
Organization Name:

Phone:

E-Mail:

Project Title: Salinas ICE - US 101 SB at Terven Ave
Project Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:50:16 PST 2021
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: Proposed - Signal Alt 2
Site Set Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 17:31:38 PST 2021
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: Proposed - 2035
Evaluation Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 18:24:46 PST 2021 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2035
Last Year of Analysis: 2035
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method

Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4SG_GE6
Calibration Factor: 1
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT Minor AADT Presence of Lighting Number of Approaches with Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Permissive/Prot ected or Protected/Perm issive Left- Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Protected Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches on which Right Turn on Red is Prohibited Presence of Red-Light Cameras Pedestrian Volumes Crossing all Intersection Legs
(crossings/day) Max. Number of Lanes Crossed
by Pedestrians Number of Bus Stops within 1000ft of Intersection Number of Schools within 1000 ft of Intersection Number of Alcohol Sales Establishments within 1000 ft of Intersection 1 4SG2x2ge6 Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2035: 23263 2035: 18466 yes 0 0 4 0 no 50 5 0 0 1 Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site Site No. Type Highway Site Description Total Predicted Crashes for Evaluation Period Predicted Total Crash Frequency (crashes/yr) Predicted FI Crash Frequency(crashes/yr) Predicted PDO Crash Frequency
(crashes/yr) Predicted Intersection Travel Crash Rate
(crashes/million veh) Intersection Crash Rate (crashes/yr) 1 4SG Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 3.824 3.8241 2.0082 1.8159 0.25 3.8241 Total Total 3.824 3.8241 2.0082 1.8159 0.25 3.8241 Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%) 2035 3.82 2.01 52.515 1.82 47.485
Total 3.82 2.01 52.515 1.82 47.485
Average 3.82 2.01 52.515 1.82 47.485
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
independently.

Table 4. Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity
Site No.

Fatal (K)
Crashes
(crashes)
Incapacitating Injury (A)
Crashes (crashes)
Non-Incapacitating Injury
(B) Crashes (crashes)
Possible Injury
(C) Crashes
(crashes)
No Injury
(O) Crashes
(crashes)
1 0.0090 0.0869 0.4683 1.4440 1.8159
Total 0.0090 0.0869 0.4683 1.4440 1.8159
Table 5. Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Angle Collision 1.42 37.0 1.00 26.2 2.42 63.2 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.07 1.8 0.00 0.0 0.07 1.8 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.18 4.6 0.08 2.2 0.26 6.8 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.06 1.4 0.04 1.0 0.10 2.5 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.02 0.6 0.11 2.9 0.13 3.5 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.04 1.0 0.00 0.0 0.04 1.0 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.16 4.1 0.27 7.0 0.43 11.1 Intersection Sideswipe 0.07 1.9 0.31 8.1 0.38 10.0
Intersection Total Intersection Total Vehicle Crashes 2.01 52.5 1.82 47.5 3.83 100.0 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 2.01 52.5 1.82 47.5 3.83 100.0 Total Crashes 2.01 52.5 1.82 47.5 3.83 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.

Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Jan 28, 2021 6:26 PM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Oct 12, 2020 9:15 AM) Evaluation Date: Thu Jan 28 18:25:28 PST 2021
IHSDM Version: v16.0.0 (Sep 30, 2020)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: jared.calise
Organization Name:

Phone:

E-Mail:

Project Title: Salinas ICE - US 101 SB at Terven Ave
Project Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:50:16 PST 2021
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: Proposed - Signal Alt 2
Site Set Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 17:31:38 PST 2021
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: Proposed - 2036
Evaluation Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 18:25:15 PST 2021 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2036
Last Year of Analysis: 2036
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method

Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4SG_GE6
Calibration Factor: 1
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT Minor AADT Presence of Lighting Number of Approaches with Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Permissive/Prot ected or Protected/Perm issive Left- Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Protected Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches on which Right Turn on Red is Prohibited Presence of Red-Light Cameras Pedestrian Volumes Crossing all Intersection Legs
(crossings/day) Max. Number of Lanes Crossed
by Pedestrians Number of Bus Stops within 1000ft of Intersection Number of Schools within 1000 ft of Intersection Number of Alcohol Sales Establishments within 1000 ft of Intersection 1 4SG2x2ge6 Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2036: 13207 2036: 10385 yes 0 0 4 0 no 50 5 0 0 1 Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site Site No. Type Highway Site Description Total Predicted Crashes for Evaluation Period Predicted Total Crash Frequency (crashes/yr) Predicted FI Crash Frequency(crashes/yr) Predicted PDO Crash Frequency
(crashes/yr) Predicted Intersection Travel Crash Rate
(crashes/million veh) Intersection Crash Rate (crashes/yr) 1 4SG Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2.736 2.7364 1.4047 1.3318 0.32 2.7364 Total Total 2.736 2.7364 1.4047 1.3318 0.32 2.7364 Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%) 2036 2.74 1.41 51.332 1.33 48.668
Total 2.74 1.41 51.332 1.33 48.668
Average 2.74 1.41 51.332 1.33 48.668
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
independently.

Table 4. Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity
Site No.

Fatal (K)
Crashes
(crashes)
Incapacitating Injury (A)
Crashes (crashes)
Non-Incapacitating Injury
(B) Crashes (crashes)
Possible Injury
(C) Crashes
(crashes)
No Injury
(O) Crashes
(crashes)
1 0.0063 0.0608 0.3276 1.0100 1.3318
Total 0.0063 0.0608 0.3276 1.0100 1.3318
Table 5. Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Angle Collision 0.99 36.1 0.73 26.9 1.72 62.9 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.05 1.8 0.00 0.0 0.05 1.8 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.12 4.5 0.06 2.2 0.18 6.7 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.04 1.4 0.03 1.1 0.07 2.5 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.02 0.6 0.08 3.0 0.10 3.5 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.03 1.1 0.00 0.0 0.03 1.1 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.11 4.0 0.20 7.2 0.31 11.2 Intersection Sideswipe 0.05 1.8 0.23 8.3 0.28 10.2
Intersection Total Intersection Total Vehicle Crashes 1.41 51.4 1.33 48.6 2.74 100.0 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 1.41 51.4 1.33 48.6 2.74 100.0 Total Crashes 1.41 51.4 1.33 48.6 2.74 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.

Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Jan 28, 2021 6:26 PM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Oct 12, 2020 9:15 AM) Evaluation Date: Thu Jan 28 18:25:51 PST 2021
IHSDM Version: v16.0.0 (Sep 30, 2020)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: jared.calise
Organization Name:

Phone:

E-Mail:

Project Title: Salinas ICE - US 101 SB at Terven Ave
Project Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 15:50:16 PST 2021
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: Proposed - Signal Alt 2
Site Set Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 17:31:38 PST 2021
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: Proposed - 2045
Evaluation Comment: Created Thu Jan 28 18:25:34 PST 2021 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2045
Last Year of Analysis: 2045
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method

Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4SG_GE6
Calibration Factor: 1
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT Minor AADT Presence of Lighting Number of Approaches with Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Permissive/Prot ected or Protected/Perm issive Left- Turn Phasing Number of Approaches with Protected Left-Turn Phasing Number of Approaches on which Right Turn on Red is Prohibited Presence of Red-Light Cameras Pedestrian Volumes Crossing all Intersection Legs
(crossings/day) Max. Number of Lanes Crossed
by Pedestrians Number of Bus Stops within 1000ft of Intersection Number of Schools within 1000 ft of Intersection Number of Alcohol Sales Establishments within 1000 ft of Intersection 1 4SG2x2ge6 Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2045: 14340 2045: 11130 yes 0 0 4 0 no 50 5 0 0 1 Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site Site No. Type Highway Site Description Total Predicted Crashes for Evaluation Period Predicted Total Crash Frequency (crashes/yr) Predicted FI Crash Frequency(crashes/yr) Predicted PDO Crash Frequency
(crashes/yr) Predicted Intersection Travel Crash Rate
(crashes/million veh) Intersection Crash Rate (crashes/yr) 1 4SG Terven Ave at Airport Blvd 2.854 2.8537 1.4698 1.3840 0.31 2.8537 Total Total 2.854 2.8537 1.4698 1.3840 0.31 2.8537 Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG_GE6) Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%) 2045 2.85 1.47 51.504 1.38 48.496
Total 2.85 1.47 51.504 1.38 48.496
Average 2.85 1.47 51.504 1.38 48.496
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
independently.

Table 4. Predicted USA 4SG_GE6 Sites Crash Severity
Site No.

Fatal (K)
Crashes
(crashes)
Incapacitating Injury (A)
Crashes (crashes)
Non-Incapacitating Injury
(B) Crashes (crashes)
Possible Injury
(C) Crashes
(crashes)
No Injury
(O) Crashes
(crashes)
1 0.0066 0.0636 0.3428 1.0568 1.3840
Total 0.0066 0.0636 0.3428 1.0568 1.3840
Table 5. Predicted 4SG_GE6 Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Angle Collision 1.03 36.2 0.76 26.8 1.80 63.0 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.05 1.8 0.00 0.0 0.05 1.8 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.13 4.5 0.06 2.2 0.19 6.7 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.04 1.4 0.03 1.1 0.07 2.5 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.02 0.6 0.08 3.0 0.10 3.5 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.03 1.1 0.00 0.0 0.03 1.1 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.12 4.0 0.20 7.2 0.32 11.2 Intersection Sideswipe 0.05 1.8 0.24 8.3 0.29 10.1
Intersection Total Intersection Total Vehicle Crashes 1.47 51.5 1.38 48.5 2.85 100.0 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 1.47 51.5 1.38 48.5 2.85 100.0 Total Crashes 1.47 51.5 1.38 48.5 2.85 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.

Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 5
ICE – US 101 Southbound Ramps at Terven Avenue/ Airport Boulevard August 10, 2021
Appendix I
Life-Cycle Benefit-Cost Worksheet
US 101 SB Ramps at Terven Av e/Airport Blv d
Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Annual Cost of Collisions $ 177,612 $ 176,442 $ 56,129
Discounted Life Cycle Cost of Collisions $ 3,729,860 $ 3,705,292 $ 1,178,719 Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Annual Quantity (hours) 27,530 14,847 3,981
Annual Cost $ 395,666 $ 214,887 $ 58,386
Total Discounted Life Cycle Cost $ 8,308,990 $ 4,512,637 $ 1,226,107 Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Annual Cost $ 25,879 $ 27,455 $ 35,287
Total Discounted Life Cycle Cost $ 351,700 $ 373,123 $ 479,559 Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Annual O&M Costs $ 8,060 $ 8,060 $ 2,520
Discounted Life Cycle O&M Costs $ 109,538 $ 109,538 $ 34,248 Discounted Pavement Rehab Costs $ - $ 45,639 $ 36,511
Total O&M Costs $ 109,538 $ 155,177 $ 70,759
Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Approximate Initial Capital Costs $0 $743,300 $3,300,000 O&M
Delay
Emissions
Initial Capital

LIFE CYCLE COST CALCULATIONS

PERFORMANCE MEASURE LIFE CYCLE COST (NET PRESENT VALUE) Safety
US 101 SB Ramps at Terven Av e/Airport Blv d
Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout
Safety $ 3,729,860 $ 3,705,292 $ 1,178,719
Delay $ 8,308,990 $ 4,512,637 $ 1,226,107
Emission $ 351,700 $ 373,123 $ 479,559
O&M $ 109,538 $ 155,177 $ 70,759
Initial Capital $ - $ 743,300 $ 3,300,000
Total Net Present Value $ 12,500,089 $ 9,489,529 $ 6,255,143 Added Benefits Compared to Existing (Signal) Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout Safety $ - $ 24,569 $ 2,551,141
Delay $ - $ 3,796,353 $ 7,082,884
Emission $ - $ (21,423) $ (127,859)
Total Benefits $ - $ 3,799,498 $ 9,506,166
Added Cost Compared to Existing (Signal) Existing (Signal) Proposed Signal Roundabout O&M $ - $ 45,639 $ (38,779)
Initial Capital $ - $ 743,300 $ 3,300,000
Total Costs $ - $ 788,939 $ 3,261,221
B/C Ratio Compared to Existing (Signal) N/A 4.82 2.91
Total Costs ( C )
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS

LIFE CYCLE BENEFIT COST RATIO
Total Benefits ( B )
US 101 SB Ramps at Terven Ave/Airport Blvd
B/C
( A ) ( B ) ( C ) = ( B - A ) ( D ) ( E ) ( F ) = ( C + D ) ( G ) = ( E / F ) High $ 817,630 $ 2,970,000 $ 2,152,370 $ 2,067,952 2.81 Low $ 668,970 $ 3,630,000 $ 2,961,030 $ 2,876,612 2.02
Roundabout Budget $ 743,300 $ 6,640,822 $ 5,897,522 $ 5,813,103 1.00 Total Costs
$ (84,418) $ 5,813,103
Note: The 'High' v alue calculates the highest Roundabout B/C. Assuming the high Proposed Signal ICC and the low Roundabout ICC.

The 'Low' v alue calculates the lowest Roundabout B/C. Assuming the low Proposed Signal ICC and the high Roundabout ICC.

Total Benefits
Benefit-Cost Ratio Calculations for Proposed Signal (A) vs Roundabout (B) B/C Target
Proposed Signal
Initial Capital Cost
Roundabout Added Cost
Project Constraints
Added O&M Cost for
Roundabout
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-153, Version: 1
Direct Purchase of two Toyota Tacomas, one FL24 Flatliner Skid Steer attachment, and one Landa ECOS-7000 Sidewalk Cleaner
Approve a Resolution authorizing the direct purchase of one Toyota Tacoma for Community Development Department at a cost of $38,096.79, one Toyota Tacoma for the Street Maintenance Division at a cost of $29,041.05, one Flatliner FL24 for the Streets Maintenance Division at a cost of $52,550.00 and one Landa ECOS-7000 sidewalk cleaner at a cost of $43,387.00 for a total cost of $163,074.84.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 4/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 12TH, 2022
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND

MAINTENANCE SERVICES
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: RONALD PATTERSON, FLEET MAINTENANCE MANANGER
TITLE: PURCHASE OF TWO 2022 TOYOTA TACOMA’S, ONE MOBILE

WASH AND RECLAIM SYSTEM, ONE SKID STEER

ATTACHMENT
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

It is recommended that City Council approve a resolution authorizing the direct purchase of one 2022 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 truck from Salinas Toyota at a total cost of $38,096.79. One Toyota Tacoma 4x2 from Salinas Toyota at a Total cost of $29,041.05. One Flatliner attachment for the Skid Steer from Keystone Engineering at a total cost of $52,550.00. One ECOS-7000 sidewalk cleaner from Always Under Pressure at a total cost of $43,387.00 RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that City Council approve a resolution authorizing the direct purchase of the equipment at a total cost of $163,074.84.

BACKGROUND:

Public Works continues replace dated and worn-out vehicle fleet and equipment. The Toyota Tacoma 4x4 double cab in this report will be used by the Community Development Department.

The Housing & Community Development Division is requesting one additional mid-size crew cab truck to facilitate its Street Outreach and Response Team activities and assist with scheduled City Health and Safety Day activities. The vehicle will serve as a primary mode of transportation for SORT staff to various encampment sites and will also be used to access encampments in rough terrain, distribute health and safety provisions, and assist with the transportation of residents and their belongings to transitional housing opportunities and temporary storage facilities.

Salinas Toyota has the 2022 Toyota Tacoma truck at a total cost of $38,096.79. The state contract base price from Freeway Toyota is $35,150.64. Salinas Toyota is above the state pricing but is within the 10% local preference at 10.8% when you remove the extra keys that Freeway quoted.

Salinas Toyota provides a lifetime powertrain warranty free of charge. The state contract does not.

Page | 2
Salinas Toyota expects this vehicle to arrive in April. Whereas the vehicle from Freeway Toyota will have to be ordered.

Street Maintenance is requesting the Toyota Tacoma 4x2 SR base. This is fleets standard small truck. This truck will be used daily to perform Under Ground Service alerts. The city gets multiple requests daily and has a limited time in which to perform the service. This truck will replace an old Izusu pickup that has been previously auctioned due to age.

Salinas Toyota’s base cost is $26,448.00. The State Contract price for base is $24,749.00. This is within the 10% local preference. The total cost from Salinas Toyota is $29,041.05. Salinas Toyota provides lifetime powertrain warranty.

Street Maintenance is further requesting an attachment to the skid steer. This attachment will remove asphalt lines and markings. This will make remarking much faster. The attachment will remove 25” wide strip. This is currently done with a small walk behind machine that is 12” wide and powered with a small engine. The attachment can also profile concrete and asphalt joining.

This attachment will be procured through Keystone Engineering. We have opted for the diamond cutting tools which extends the lift 50 times. There is more upfront cost but will save in labor and total cost over the lift of the unit. Total cost is $52,550.00.

Maintenance Services is requesting a tool that can help clean sidewalks. After doing some research it was concluded that the Landa ECOS-7000 would fit our need best. This trailer towed unit will Used heated and pressurized water to clean. It vacuums the water meeting our NPDES requirements. It takes the vacuumed water and filters it for use again. This will reduce water consumption versus conventional methods.

This unit from Always Under Pressure has a total cost of $43,387.00.

Council has the authority to approve these purchases under Municipal Code Section 12-25 - Exceptions (cooperative purchasing with other governmental agencies) and Section 12-27 – Exceptions (due to the nature of the purchase, low-bid based competition is not likely to serve the best interest of the city, yield the best value to the city, or result in the lowest price).

The city can utilize cooperative purchases with other government agencies. Local businesses are given the opportunity to compete against these contracts. This purchase from Salinas Toyota satisfies the purpose and requirements of Article III-A, Local Purchasing Preference of the Salinas Municipal Code by being within ten percent of the State Contract.

Below is a simple break down of cost.

Tacoma 4x2 Street Maintenance 5800.50.9110-66.5500 $29,041.05 Flatliner FL 24 Street Maintenance 5800.50.9110-66.5400 $52,550.00 Landa ECOS Maintenance Services 5800.50.9068-66.5400 $43,387.00 Tacoma 4x4 CCD Sort 2944.30.3240-66.5500 $38,096.79
Page | 3
CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The requested Council action directly relates to Council’s Strategic Plans or Goals of providing “Operational Efficiencies” and “Well Planned City and Excellent Infrastructure. The purchase of these vehicles and equipment allows the City of Salinas to continue to provide valued service to the community.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Fleet Maintenance, in coordination with Community Development and the Street Maintenance Division selected the appropriate vehicles and or equipment based on typical usage and demand.

It was concluded the Toyota Tacoma truck meets both the needs of the Housing and Community Development Division and Streets Division as well as the requirements of the Fleet Maintenance Shop. The Finance Department will coordinate the purchase and title change.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Funds are appropriated and available in the following expenditure accounts:
 2944.30.3240-66.5500
 5800.50.9110-66.5400
 5800.50.9068-66.5400
ATTACHMENTS:

City Council Resolution
2022 Salinas Toyota Truck Quote
Freeway Toyota (State Contract) Quote
State Contract pricing sheet
Keystone Engineering Quote
Always Under Pressure Quote
Brochures
RESOLUTION NO.____________(N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DIRECT PURCHASE
OF TWO TOYOTA TACOMA’S, ONE SKID STEER ATTACHMENT, AND ONE

SIDEWALK CLEANER
WHEREAS, Funds are available in 2944.30.3240-66.5500 to purchase one Toyota Tacoma 4x4 for the Housing and Community Development Division ; and WHEREAS, Funds are available in 5800.50.9110-66.5500 to purchase one Toyota Tacoma 4x2 and on FL24 Flatliner attachment for the Street maintenance Division; and WHEREAS, Funds are available in 5800.50.9068-66.5400 to purchase one side walk cleaner; and
WHEREAS, replacing aging vehicles within the City of Salinas’ vehicle fleet supports City’s Council’s Strategic Plan and Goals of “Operational Efficiencies;” and WHEARAS, Staff chose the 2022 Toyota Tacoma from Salinas Toyota at a cost of $38,096.79 for the 4x4 double cab and $29,041.05 for the 4x2; and WHEREAS, Staff chose the 2022 Flatliner FL24 from Keystone Engineering at a cost of $52,550.00
WHEREAS, Staff chose the 2022 Landa ECOS-7000 from Always Under Pressure for a total cost of $43,387.00; and
WHEREAS, these purchases may be made directly pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code section 12-27 because the City Council finds that due to the nature of these purchases, including the local and immediate availability of the vehicles at a low cost, low-based bid competition is not likely to serve the best interests of the City, yield the best value to the City, or result in a lower price; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that with respect to the vehicle purchases, the City’s local purchasing preference has been satisfied.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 12-27, the Salinas City Council authorizes the Purchasing Officer to purchase: one 2022 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 truck from Salinas Toyota at a total cost of $38,096.79; one Toyota Tacoma 4x2 from Salinas Toyota at a total cost of $29,041.05; one Flatliner attachment for the Skid Steer from Keystone Engineering at a total cost of $52,550.00; and one ECOS-7000 sidewalk cleaner from Always Under Pressure at a total cost of $43,387.00
PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April, 2022 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Always Under Pressure
990 Lonus Street
San Jose, Ca 95126-3713
800-654-6879
408-998-3051
Fax-998-0881
pressurewashers.com
Company: Salinas City Center Improvement
Association Date: March 9, 2022
Address: 4 West Gabilan Street
Salinas, CA 93901
Quote #:

Written by:
2687 B
David R. Wyett
Attn: Ron Patterson Cell #: 408-685-7425
Phone: 831-975-4428 e-mail: [email protected] Fax: Est. Delivery: 7-10 days from order
Cell: 831-768-7104 Terms: Check or CC w/order or lease
e-mail: [email protected] Quote Valid: For 60 days Qty Part # Description Each Price
1 LANDA, Environmentally Clean Operating System Part # 11038250 $39,967.00 $39,967.00

4.7 pgm @ 3,500 psi
24 hp, Honda, two cylinder, electric start engine, GX660cc 120 volt, belt-driven, 4,000 watt generator built-in; w/diesel-fired burner Durable heating coil with five year warranty
Insulated variable pressure wand with side grip w/4 quick coupler nozzles Tandem Trailer rated for 7,000 lbs, 15" tires, w/electric brakes on both axles Durable Swing-Away Tongue with 2-5/16 inch Ball Coupler 30 in. x 7 ft. Galley with step/tailgate & storage for 2" X 50' Vacuum Hose Two Hose Reels for 100 ft. of high pressure hose & 75 ft. of garden hose.

Revolutionary Vacuum/Water Reclaim System
4-100 gl. water tanks w/drain
3/8" X 100' High Pressure Hose
1 87512990 Mosmatic Recovery Surface Cleaner, 21", Stainless Steel FL-AH520 $4,039.90 $4,039.90 For a Mobile Cleaner Discount, deduct $7,993.40
Lease Options Available 36 month Lease-to-Buy $1,518.54 Freight-in $3,700.00
Options: Sub-total $39,713.50
1 87390720 Hose, pressure, two-braid, 3/8" X 50' w/couplers $130.30 Tax $3,673.50 Total $43,387.00
Locked compartment includes Dual Fuel Tanks for gasoline engine (17 gal.) and diesel burner (17 gal.),
Conveniently placed Locked Control Panel includes key start, choke, Burner On/Off Switch, Adjustable Thermostat, and an Hour/Tech Meter to indicate engine speed and total operating time.

ECOS7000
Thank You!
Acceptance
Customer Signature: ________________________________________________________________________________ Date: ____________________________________ PO#: ____________________________________________ Industrial-grade, tri-plex, oil-bath, belt-driven, high pressure LANDA pump with a 7 year warranty
Filter Recovery System includes a 40 gal holding tank with a 50 micron, Pre-Filter Sock, a 20 micron Pleated Cartridge Filter, a 5 micro Carbon Filter, and an Oil Skimmer Bag.

Main Control Valve System includes easy to use valve flow diagram for controlling water distribution.

Quotation
Landa ECOS-7000
Thank you for the opportunity to quote this equipment.
n Four 15-inch Black-Rim
Wheels with 205/75/R15D tires on
Tandem Axles rated at 3,500 lbs
each (7,000 lbs total) with Electric
Brakes on both axles and battery
operated Breakaway Kit for
added safety.
n Insulated, spring-loaded Trigger
Gun and insulated, dual-lance
Variable Pressure Wand make it
easy to switch between detergent
wash and rinse modes.

Galley storage compartment underneath the floor allows
for easy storage of the vacuum hose. Shown with garden
hose (not included).
n Locked compartment
includes Dual Fuel Tanks for
gasoline engine (17 gallons)
and diesel burner (17 gallons).

Also includes space for two
detergent buckets.
n Safety Features including
redundant devices such as
a Rupture Disk, and hightemperature shutdown to
guard against excessive
pressure or heat.
n Patented Trans-Heat
Technology** captures exhaust
from the engine to preheat water,
increasing water temperatures
up to 15°F and providing better
fuel efficiency.
n 30 in. x 7 ft. Galley allows
for storage of pressure washer
equipment with a removable
rear gate.
n Two Hose Reels hold up to 100
ft. of high-pressure hose and 75 ft.
of low-pressure hose.
n Vacuum / Water Reclaim System
with 50 feet of 2-inch vacuum hose
and draggable, non-tipping suction
head provides
continuous suction
of wash water.
n Four Polyethylene Water Tanks
provide 400 gallons of clean water
and are linked for even distribution.

Main Control Valve System includes
easy to use valves for controlling
water distribution. Feed Pump with
pressure-sensing switch alleviates
n Multi-Stage Filtering System wear and tear on main pump. includes a 40 gallon holding tank
with a 500 micron mesh/100 micron
duo-polyester Pre-Filter Sock, a
50 micron Pleated Polyester Filter
(20 micron on LX and DX models),
a 20 micron Pleated Polyester Filter
(5 micron on LX and DX models), and
an Oil Absorbent Media Bag. Clean
water is directed to selected tanks for
reuse, or can be dumped directly to
drain, pending local EPA requirements.
n Conveniently placed Locked
Control Panel includes key start,
choke, Burner On/Off Switch,
Adjustable Thermostat, and an
Hour Meter with low oil indicator.

Also includes reclaim pump,
vacuum motor switches and
Low Point Drain for water tanks.
n Honda GX660 Engine and Landa
LT Pump with 7-year warranty provide

4.7 GPM at 3500 PSI of cleaning power.
n Landa Duracoil with stainless
steel top wrap and 5-year
warranty heats water using highefficiency 120‑volt Burner. n Heavy-Duty 4,000 Watt Generator
produces reliable 120V AC power
to the burner and vacuum.
n Four Color-Coded Quick-Couple
Nozzles made of hardened stainless
steel are mounted near hose
reel for ready access.
n Durable Swing-Away Tongue
(rated for 7,500 lbs) connects with
either a 2 5/16-inch Ball Coupler
or Lunette Ring (DX model), 7-pin
Electrical Trailer Plug and
heavy-duty 2,000 lb. capacity
Swivel Jack, allowing trailer to
be stored in a smaller area.
n 4.7 GPM at 3500 PSI
n Carries up to 400 gallons
n Captures, filters and
recycles wash water for
continuous use
n Patented Trans-Heat
Technology** provides
better fuel efficiency
ECOS
Environmentally Friendly
Mobile Wash and Reclaim System
Manufactured To Cleaning Equipment Trade Association Performance Standa dr s Cleaning Equipment Trade Association
Performance
Certified
TM
PUMP

WARRANTY
Part No

1.103-825.0 ECOS-7000

1.103-838.0 ECOS-7000 features standard 25/16-inch ball hitch and spare tire configuration (LX model)

1.103-839.0 ECOS-7000 features adjustable lunette hitch and spare tire configuration (DX model)
Pressure Washer System
Volume 4.7 GPM
Pressure 3500 PSI
Engine Honda GX660, 688cc
Engine Fuel Gasoline (17-gallon tank)
Pump Landa LT (1360 RPM)
Generator 4,000 watts/120VAC
Wand Assembly Variable pressure wand with 50' hose
Detergent Downstream detergent injector
Multi-Stage Filter System
Pre-Filter 500 micron mesh/100 micron duo-polyester bag Oil Removal Oil absorbent media bag
Sediment 50 micron pleated polyester (20 micron on LX/DX Series) Polish 20 micron pleated polyester (5 micron on LX/DX Series) Vacuum System
Suction 105 CFM
Hose 50' x 2" diameter
Heating System
Pre-Heating Patented Trans-Heat Technology**
Coil 1/2" Schedule 80
Burner Fuel Diesel/kerosene/fuel oil (17-gallon tank)
BTUs 440,000
Trailer
Water Tank Capacity 400 gallons
Gross Vehicle 6,000 lbs.

Weight Rating (GVWR)
Trailer Axles Dual, 3,500 lbs. each, both with electric brakes Wheels 15-inch wheels, ST205/75/R15D tires
Swing-Away Tongue 7,500 lb. capacity, 25/16-inch ball coupler (standard/LX series) or adjustable lunette hitch (DX series)
Swivel Jack 2,000 lb. capacity
Safety Chains Dual 5/16-inch steel link with latching hooks Lights DOT approved recessed lights, license plate holder (LED lights LX/DX Series only)
Reflective conspicuity tape (LX/DX Series only)
Dimensions 174"L x 75"W x 73.5"H (with swing-away tongue extended) Dry Weight 2,865 lbs.

Shipping Dimensions 161"L x 85"W x 82"H (pallet & crate) Shipping Weight 3,500 lbs.

Form #9.801-254.0 • © 2014 • 07/14
For a Better Tomorrow…Clean Green with Landa!
Shown with optional Mosmatic Surface Cleaner (not included).

Distributed by:

ECOS Specifications
Part No. Description

8.739-074.0 100 ft. Tuff-Skin 6000 PSI Hose

8.903-606.0 Water Jet Surface Cleaner (optional)

8.922-019.0 Spare Tire Kit, ECOS Trailer - No Panel (tire not included)

8.922-020.0 Spare Tire Kit, ECOS Trailer - With Panel (tire not included)

8.752-044.0 Tire/Wheel Assembly, Black, 15" Radial

8.726-045.0 5 micron Carbon Filter Cartridge

8.726-044.0 20 micron Pleated Filter Cartfidge

8.726-042.0 Pre-Filter Sock

8.726-046.0 Oil Absorbant Sock
See Dealer Drain Covers (multiple options available)
See Dealer Portable Wash Pads (multiple options available) See Dealer Water Berms (multiple options available)
Options & Accessories:

ECOS www.landa.com
Landa’s revolutionary, patented ECOS Mobile Wash and Reclaim System* recovers, filters and recycles the dirty water from pressure washing for safe disposal or reuse—meeting most municipal and environmental regulations. The fuel burner savings from the patented Trans-Heat Technology** allows for a fast return on investment. Call your local Landa Dealer to learn how your fuel savings can help make your lease payment!
*Protected by U.S. Patent No. D701,357 8,597,434 8,721,805 B2 **Patent No. US-2011-0232696-A1

Quotation
TO: Ronald Patterson- City of Salinas DATE: March 9, 2022 PHONE: 831-402-5379 FOR: Flatliner Attachment
EMAIL: [email protected]
Quantity Description
1 Flatliner FL24 with 12:1 Gearbox and Side Wheels
Flatliner FL24 with Diamond Tools
$39,900.00
$52,550.00
Total Amount Due
Keystone Engineering expressly warrants its products to be free from defect in workmanship or materials. Any claim for defective materials or workmanship must be made in writing within 90 days of shipment. If on inspection Keystone Engineering acknowledges defects, we shall be liable only for the replacement of defective material, FOB point of manufacture. In no event shall Keystone Engineering’s liability exceed the invoice value of products purchased. 9786 E. Co. Rd. 200 N., Avon, IN 46123
317.271.6192 ph 317.271.6299 fax
www.keystonecutter.com
 Precisely levels bumps and other irregularities, acts as a profilograph and bump grinder in one  Utilizes Keystone Engineering’s patented Flat Tooth Cutting Technology  100% surface coverage, unlike diamond blades and other traditional carbide conical bits and flail cutters  Minimal surface damage seen when comparing to traditional carbide bits and water blasting equipment  Equipped with Keystone’s Internal Water System for dust control

PRECISON GRINDING ATTACHMENT
 Precise Depth Control
 Variable Cutting Widths: 1”-49”
 100% Surface Coverage
Ensuring accurate pavement depth at
Chicago’s Midway Airport
Flat Tooth Quick-Change System
Pavement Markings and Coatings Removal
Corrective Grind—IRI Improvement

FL MODEL ILLUSTRATION
Flat Tooth Drum System– Variable Width Design

PRECISON GRINDING ATTACHMENT
Flat Tooth Carbide/PCD Cutter Full Round PCD Cutter Twin PCD Cutter WWW.KEYSTONECUTTER.COM
Flatlined Surface
Adjustable Averaging Ski 1
Flat Tooth Drum System 2
Sweeper Brush 3
Safety Caster 4
Rear Depth Setting Caster 5
Floating Mounting Plate 6
FL24 FL36 FL48
Grinding Width 0-25” 0-37” 0-49”
Grinding Depth 0-1.5” 0-1.5” 0-1.5”
Number of Bits 72 106 140
Hydraulic Horsepower (HHP) Requirement 45 60 70
Operating Weight (lbs) 2600 3000 3400
1 2
3 4
5 6

FL MODEL SPECIFICATIONS
Keystone Engineering & Mfg. Corp.

Corporate: 317-271-6192
Sales: 317-319-7639
[email protected]
www.keystonecutter.com
Made in the USA
IDEAL FOR:
 Ride Quality/IRI Improvement
 Maintenance Work/Bump Grinding
 Coatings/Membrane Removal
 Pavement Markings Removal

PRECISION GRINDING ATTACHMENT
700 AUTO CENTER CIR
SALINAS, CA 93907
2022 TACOMA SR 4X4 DOUBLE CAB
Quote# 111185
MSRP: $34,737.00
DOC FEE: $85.00
CA TIRE FEE: $8.75
TRANFER FEE: $45.00
SALES TAX (9.25%): $3,221.04
OUT THE DOOR COST: $38,096.79
2022 TACOMA SR 4X2 ACCESS CAB
Quote# 111185
MSRP: $26,448.00
DOC FEE: $85.00
CA TIRE FEE: $8.75
TRANFER FEE: $45.00
SALES TAX (9.25%): $2,454.30
OUT THE DOOR COST: $29,041.05

FREEWAY TOYOTA
1835 Glendale Ave
Hanford, CA. 93230
City of Salinas 3/3/2022
200 Lincoln Ave
Salinas, CA. 93901
Attn: Ronald Patterson
As per your request for CA State Contract #1-18-23-20C Line Item #4 2021 Toyota Tacoma SR 4WD Crew Cab (7594) $30407.00
Upgrade to 2022 $339.00
2T-All Weather floor liners $248.00
K01-2 additional key/FOBs cut and programed $790.00
DMV Doc fee $85.00

9.25% Sales Tax $2947.89
CA Tire Tax $8.75
Delivery to Salinas $325.00
Total $35,150.64 each
Protect against future mechanical or electrical issues with Toyota Platinum Extra Care $0 Deductible 5 Years /100,000 Miles $1030.00
6 Years / 100,000 Miles $1250.00
7 Years / 125,000 Miles $1745.00

Thank you for the opportunity to earn your business.

Patrick G Ireland
Government Fleet Manager
Salinas Toyota
700 Auto Center Circle
Salinas CA 93907
831-444-0700
2022 Tacoma-SR
Tacoma-SR 4x4 Double Cab V6 Engine 6-
Speed Automatic Transmission 5-Ft. Bed
Model: 7594C
VIN: 3TMCZ5AN1NM12A621
Engine: 3.5L-V6 Engine
Transmission: 6-Speed-Automatic Transmission EXTERIOR
White

INTERIOR
Cement-Gray Fabric
PRICE
Vehicle base model (MSRP *) $32,965.00
Factory Installed Packages &
Accessories
$557.00
Delivery processing / handling $1,215.00
Total Price $34,737.00
Fuel Economy
20MPG 18MPG 22MPG
Combined CITY Highway

TOTAL INSTALLED PACKAGES & ACCESSORIES
50-State Emissions $0.00
All-Weather-Floor Liners and Door Sill Protectors
All-Weather-Floor Liners, Door Sill Protectors.
$248.00
Bed-Lighting Kit
Why-go fumbling in the dark when you don't have to? The bed lighting kit will effectively light up your truck bed so you can actually see what you're loading and unloading. High-performance LED truck bed lighting helps improve cargo management at night or in dark locations. Two separate light assemblies each including six LEDs—on the inside bed walls and near the rear of the cargo area—provide excellent light distribution while loading and unloading. Precise placement angles illuminate toward important cargo locations. Constructed of high-quality, durable materials.
$149.00
Tailgate-Insert
Tailgate-inserts emphasize the Tacoma stamp in the tailgate and are an easy way to customize the look of your truck.

Individual letters strongly adhere into the stamped tailgate logo. Attached with strong adhesive backing. Two colors available, bright chrome or flat black.
$160.00
Total Optional Equipment $557.00
Vehicle base model (MSRP *) $32,965.00
Delivery processing / handling $1,215.00
Features
Mechanical & Performance
Engine:-3.5-liter V6 direct-injection Atkinson-cycle engine with 278 hp @ 6000 rpm/265 lb.-ft. @ 4600 rpm
Engine:-3.5-liter V6 DOHC 24-valve direct-injection Atkinsoncycle engine with VVT-iW (Variable Valve Timing-intelligent Wider 1 Emission-Rating: Low Emission Vehicle III (LEV-III)
Drivetrain:-4WDemand part-time 4WD with electronically
controlled transfer case and Automatic Limited-Slip Differential (Auto LSD)
Body-Construction: One-piece frame rails with eight cross members and fully boxed front sub-frame
Steering:-Variable-assist power rack-and-pinion steering Turning-circle diameter, curb-to-curb (ft.) 40.6
Engine-3.5L V6 Engine
Weight-Rating 5600 lbs
Intake) and VVT-i (Variable Valve Timing-intelligent Exhaust), with 278 hp @ 6000 rpm/265 lb.-ft. @ 4600 rpm (bore x stroke: 94.0 x

83.0 mm.; compression ratio: 11.8)
Transmission:-6-speed Electronically Controlled automatic Transmission with intelligence (ECT-i)
Off-road:-Hill Start Assist Control (HAC)
Suspension:-Coil-spring double-wishbone front suspension and stabilizer bar; leaf spring rear suspension with staggered outboard-mounted gas shock absorbers and stabilizer bar Brakes:-Power-assisted ventilated front disc brakes; rear drum brakes with tandem booster and Star Safety System™
4WDemand-part-time 4WD (4WD)
6-Speed-Automatic Transmission
Exterior
5-ft.-Short Bed
Dark-gray grille with black surround, and color-keyed heated power outside mirrors, door handles and rear bumper
Deck-rail system with four adjustable tie-down cleats and four fixed cargo bed tie-down points
Variable-intermittent windshield wipers with mist cycle Skid-plate(s): on engine/front suspension
Projector-beam-headlights with turn Daytime Running Lights (DRL) Fiber-reinforced-Sheet-Molded Composite (SMC) inner bed with steel outer panels, storage compartments and rail caps, with easy lower, lockable and removable tailgate
16-in.-styled steel wheels with P245/75R16 tires
Sliding-rear glass with privacy glass
Integrated-color-keyed tailgate spoiler
Exterior Dimensions
Overall-height 70.6
Overall-length 212.3
Bed-length 60.5
Bed-width (between wheelwells) 41.5
Overall-width 74.4
Wheelbase-127.4
Bed-height 19.1
Track-(front/rear) 63/63.2
Interior
Analog-instrumentation with speedometer, tachometer, coolant temperature and fuel gauges; 4.2-in. color Multi-Information Display (MID) with outside temperature, odometer, tripmeters and average fuel economy
Three-total USB ports: one USB media port, two USB charge ports Fabric-trimmed-seats; 4-way adjustable driver’s seat with lumbar support; 4-way adjustable front passenger seat
Power-windows and door locks
Front-dual zone automatic climate control with air filter and individual temperature settings for driver and front passenger Manual-day/night rearview mirror
Urethane-tilt/telescopic steering wheel with audio controls Audio Multimedia
Audio—includes-7-in. touchscreen, six speakers, Android Auto™ & Apple CarPlay® & Amazon Alexa compatible, hands-free phone capability and music streaming via Bluetooth® wireless technology, SiriusXM® with 3-month All Access trial subscription. See toyota.com/audio-multimedia for details. Connected Services — Safety Connect® with 1-year trial, Wi-Fi Connect with up to 2 GB within 3-month trial. S
ToyotaCare
No-cost maintenance $0 (NO COST) 24-hour-Roadside Assistance $0 (NO COST) Safety & Convenience
Star-Safety System™—includes Vehicle Stability Control (VSC), Traction Control (TRAC), Anti-lock Brake System (ABS) with Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD), Brake Assist (BA) and Smart Stop Technology® (SST)
Driver-and front passenger Advanced Airbag System
Driver-and front passenger active headrests
Child-protector-rear door locks
Class-IV-towing hitch receiver, ATF cooler (not available on manual transmission), engine oil cooler, power steering cooler, 130-amp alternator, 4- and 7-pin connector with converter, and Trailer-Sway Control (TSC) (V6 only)
Toyota-Safety Sense™ P (TSS-P): Pre-Collision System w/Pedestrian Detection (PCS w/PD), Dynamic Radar Cruise Control (DRCC), Lane Departure Alert, Automatic High Beams (AHB)
Driver-and front passenger seat-mounted side airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags and front and rear Roll-sensing Side Curtain Airbags (RSCA)
LATCH-(Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) includes lower anchors for front passenger seats on Access Cab and outboard rear seats on Double Cab
Tire-Pressure Monitor System (TPMS)
Engine-immobilizer
2022 TOYOTA Tacoma SR - 3TMCZ5AN1NM12A621
2 *2022 Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price excludes the Delivery +Processing and Handling Fee taxes license title and available or regionally required +equipment.

Actual Dealer price may vary. Pricing fuel economy specification standard features and +available equipment are based on information available when this page was produced and +subject to change without notice.

ToyotaCare, which covers normal factory scheduled maintenance for 2 years or 25,000 miles, whichever comes first, is included as part of the sales price of the vehicle for qualifying buyers. See participating dealer for eligibility and coverage details.

Disclaimer: This document is only representative of some of the information contained on an actual window sticker and is not meant to replace or + substitute for the actual window sticker on the vehicle. Please see your retailer for +further information.

Created Date: 3/9/22
2022 TOYOTA Tacoma SR - 3TMCZ5AN1NM12A621
3 Salinas Toyota
700 Auto Center Circle
Salinas CA 93907
831-444-0700
2022 Tacoma-SR
Tacoma-SR 4x2 Access Cab 4-Cyl. Engine 6-
Speed Automatic Transmission 6-Ft. Bed
Model: 7162C
VIN: 3TYRX5GN4NT12B712
Engine: 2.7L-4-Cyl. Engine
Transmission: 6-Speed-Automatic Transmission EXTERIOR
White

INTERIOR
Cement-Gray Fabric
PRICE
Vehicle base model (MSRP *) $26,700.00
Factory Installed Packages &
Accessories
-$1,467.00
Delivery processing / handling $1,215.00
Total Price $26,448.00
Fuel Economy
21MPG 20MPG 23MPG
Combined CITY Highway

TOTAL INSTALLED PACKAGES & ACCESSORIES
50-State Emissions $0.00
Utility-Package
Utility-Package (4-cyl. Access Cab)—includes black door handles, black mirror caps, black rear bumpers and fixed rear window. Removes rear speakers, seats (seatbacks, headrests and seatbelts), along with rear cup holders and intermittent wiper.
-$1,715.00
All-Weather-Flr Liner/Door Sill Protector $248.00
Total Optional Equipment -$1,467.00
Vehicle base model (MSRP *) $26,700.00
Delivery processing / handling $1,215.00
Features
Mechanical & Performance
Engine:-2.7-liter DOHC 16-valve 4-cylinder with VVT-i; 159 hp @ 5200 rpm; 180 lb.-ft. @ 3800 rpm
Transmission:-6-speed Electronically Controlled automatic Transmission with intelligence (ECT-i)
Off-road:-Hill Start Assist Control (HAC)
Suspension:-Coil-spring double-wishbone front suspension and stabilizer bar; leaf spring rear suspension with staggered outboard-mounted gas shock absorbers and stabilizer bar Brakes:-Power-assisted ventilated front disc brakes; rear drum brakes with tandem booster and Star Safety System™
Rear-Wheel-Drive (RWD) with Automatic Limited-Slip Differential Emission-Rating: Low Emission Vehicle III (LEV-III)
Drivetrain:-Rear-Wheel Drive (RWD) with Automatic Limited-Slip Differential (Auto LSD)
Body-Construction: One-piece frame rails with eight cross members and fully boxed front sub-frame
Steering:-Variable-assist power rack-and-pinion steering Turning-circle diameter, curb-to-curb (ft.) 40.6
Engine-2.7L 4-Cyl. Engine
Weight-Rating 5600 lbs
1 (Auto LSD)
6-Speed-Automatic Transmission
Exterior
6-ft.-Standard Bed
Dark-gray grille with black surround, and color-keyed heated power outside mirrors, door handles and rear bumper
Deck-rail system with four adjustable tie-down cleats and four fixed cargo bed tie-down points
Variable-intermittent windshield wipers with mist cycle Skid-plate(s): on engine/front suspension
Projector-beam-headlights with turn Daytime Running Lights (DRL) Fiber-reinforced-Sheet-Molded Composite (SMC) inner bed with steel outer panels, storage compartments and rail caps, with easy lower, lockable and removable tailgate
16-in.-styled steel wheels with P245/75R16 tires
Sliding-rear glass with privacy glass
Integrated-color-keyed tailgate spoiler
Exterior Dimensions
Overall-height 70.6
Overall-length 212.3
Bed-length 73.7
Bed-width (between wheelwells) 41.5
Overall-width 74.4
Wheelbase-127.4
Bed-height 19.1
Track-(front/rear) 63 / 63.2
Interior
Analog-instrumentation with speedometer, tachometer, coolant temperature and fuel gauges; 4.2-in. color Multi-Information Display (MID) with outside temperature, odometer, tripmeters and average fuel economy
Three-total USB ports: one USB media port, two USB charge ports Fabric-trimmed-seats; 4-way adjustable driver’s seat with lumbar support; 4-way adjustable front passenger seat
Power-windows and door locks
Air-conditioning
Manual-day/night rearview mirror
Urethane-tilt/telescopic steering wheel with audio controls Audio Multimedia
Audio—includes-7-in. touchscreen, six speakers, Android Auto™ & Apple CarPlay® & Amazon Alexa compatible, hands-free phone capability and music streaming via Bluetooth® wireless technology, SiriusXM® with 3-month All Access trial subscription. See toyota.com/audio-multimedia for details. Connected Services — Safety Connect® with 1-year trial, Wi-Fi Connect with up to 2 GB within 3-month trial. S
ToyotaCare
No-cost maintenance $0 (NO COST) 24-hour-Roadside Assistance $0 (NO COST) Safety & Convenience
Star-Safety System™—includes Vehicle Stability Control (VSC), Traction Control (TRAC), Anti-lock Brake System (ABS) with Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD), Brake Assist (BA) and Smart Stop Technology® (SST)
Driver-and front passenger Advanced Airbag System
Driver-and front passenger active headrests
Tire-Pressure Monitor System (TPMS)
Toyota-Safety Sense™ P (TSS-P): Pre-Collision System w/Pedestrian Detection (PCS w/PD), Dynamic Radar Cruise Control (DRCC), Lane Departure Alert, Automatic High Beams (AHB)
Driver-and front passenger seat-mounted side airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags and front and rear Roll-sensing Side Curtain Airbags (RSCA)
LATCH-(Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) includes lower anchors for front passenger seats on Access Cab and outboard rear seats on Double Cab
Engine-immobilizer
*2022 Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price excludes the Delivery +Processing and Handling Fee taxes license title and available or regionally required +equipment.

Created Date: 3/9/22
2022 TOYOTA Tacoma SR - 3TYRX5GN4NT12B712
2 Contact Line Item #
(CLIN) Description Freight on Board (FOB) UNSPSC Code Unit of Measure(UOM) Quantity in Unit of
Measure Make Model Vehicle Unit Price Maintenance Plan Contract Unit Price Dealer Contract Number Technical
Questionnaire
1 Small Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box, 125
in. WB, 4500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Toyota Tacoma $24,765.00 $749.00 Freeway Toyota 1-18-23-20C See Attachment D 1 Small Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box, 125
in. WB, 4500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Nissan Frontier $22,158.00 $499.00 Selma Nissan/Honda 1-18-23-20G See Attachment D 1 Small Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box, 125
in. WB, 4500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Colorado *$23,266.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 1 Small Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box, 125
in. WB, 4500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford Ranger $23,012.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 2 Small Pickup, 4x2, Crew Cab, Short Box, 125 in.

WB, 4500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Toyota Tacoma $25,874.00 $749.00 Freeway Toyota 1-18-23-20C See Attachment D 2 Small Pickup, 4x2, Crew Cab, Short Box, 125 in.

WB, 4500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Nissan Frontier $23,040.00 $499.00 Selma Nissan/Honda 1-18-23-20G See Attachment D 2 Small Pickup, 4x2, Crew Cab, Short Box, 125 in.

WB, 4500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Colorado *$24,444.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 2 Small Pickup, 4x2, Crew Cab, Short Box, 125 in.

WB, 4500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford Ranger $24,197.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 3 Small Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box, 125
in. WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Toyota Tacoma $27,375.00 $749.00 Freeway Toyota 1-18-23-20C See Attachment D 3 Small Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box, 125
in. WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Nissan Frontier $24,345.00 $499.00 Selma Nissan/Honda 1-18-23-20G See Attachment D 3 Small Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box, 125
in. WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Colorado *$26,220.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 3 Small Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box, 125
in. WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford Ranger $24,393.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A Coming Soon 4 Small Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 125 in.

WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Toyota Tacoma $30,407.00 $749.00 Freeway Toyota 1-18-23-20C See Attachment D 4 Small Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 125 in.

WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Nissan Frontier $26,024.00 $499.00 Selma Nissan/Honda 1-18-23-20G See Attachment D 4 Small Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 125 in.

WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Colorado *$28,379.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D Fleet Vehicles - Trucks, *Supplement 14, dated 04/05/2021* Attachment A- Contract Pricing
Contract 1-18-23-20 (A-I)
Terms: $500 discount per vehicle for payment with net 20 days (Excluding Riverview International and Sacramento Truck Center) $200 discount per vehicle for payment with net 20 days (Riverview International Only) 1 Contact Line Item #
(CLIN) Description Freight on Board (FOB) UNSPSC Code Unit of Measure(UOM) Quantity in Unit of
Measure Make Model Vehicle Unit Price Maintenance Plan Contract Unit Price Dealer Contract Number Technical
Questionnaire
4 Small Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 125 in.

WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Honda Ridgeline $34,725.90 $499.00 Wondries Fleet Group 1-18-23-20E See Attachment D 4 Small Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 125 in.

WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford Ranger $26,301.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 7 Small Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box, 125
in. WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Colorado *$33,061.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 8 Small Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 125 in.

WB, 5000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL Fueled Vehicle in
accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Colorado *$34,119.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 9 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
119 in. WB, 6000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F150 $21,727.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 9 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
119 in. WB, 6000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ram 1500 $18,992.00 $749.00 Elk Grove Auto Group 1-18-23-20B See Attachment D 9 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
119 in. WB, 6000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 *$24,344.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 10 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6100 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F150 $23,306.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 10 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6100 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ram 1500 $20,141.00 $749.00 Elk Grove Auto Group 1-18-23-20B See Attachment D 10 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6100 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 *$25,129.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 11 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Crew Cab, Short Box, 140
in. WB, 6100 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F150 $25,011.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 11 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Crew Cab, Short Box, 140
in. WB, 6100 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ram 1500 $23,201.00 $749.00 Elk Grove Auto Group 1-18-23-20B See Attachment D 11 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Crew Cab, Short Box, 140
in. WB, 6100 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 *$27,269.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 12 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
119 in. WB, 6000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F150 $24,899.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 12 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
119 in. WB, 6000 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 *$27,958.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 13 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6300 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F150 $25,234.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 2 Contact Line Item #
(CLIN) Description Freight on Board (FOB) UNSPSC Code Unit of Measure(UOM) Quantity in Unit of
Measure Make Model Vehicle Unit Price Maintenance Plan Contract Unit Price Dealer Contract Number Technical
Questionnaire
13 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6300 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ram 1500 $23,367.00 $749.00 Elk Grove Auto Group 1-18-23-20B See Attachment D 13 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6300 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 *$27,546.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 14 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 140
in. WB, 6300 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F150 $29,165.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 14 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 140
in. WB, 6300 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 *$29,343.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 15 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6100 lb. GVWR, E85 Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F150 $23,108.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 15 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6100 lb. GVWR, E85 Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 *$26,566.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 16 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6300 lb. GVWR, E85 Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F150 $25,484.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 16 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6300 lb. GVWR, E85 Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 *$28,983.00* $749.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 17 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6200 lb. GVWR, DIESEL Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F150 $29,345.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 18 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
140 in. WB, 6500 lb. GVWR, DIESEL Fueled
Vehicle in accordance with specification 2310-
4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F150 $31,373.00 $499.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 19 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 133 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F250 *$23,176.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 19 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 133 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 *$26,714.00* Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 20 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 141 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F250 *$25,595.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 20 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 141 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 *$27,709.00* Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 21 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Crew Cab, Short Box, 350
HP, 153 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F250 *$26,734.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 21 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Crew Cab, Short Box, 350
HP, 153 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 *$29,649.00* Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 3 Contact Line Item #
(CLIN) Description Freight on Board (FOB) UNSPSC Code Unit of Measure(UOM) Quantity in Unit of
Measure Make Model Vehicle Unit Price Maintenance Plan Contract Unit Price Dealer Contract Number Technical
Questionnaire
22 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 133 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F250 *$25,990.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 22 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 133 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ram 2500 $25,515.00 Elk Grove Auto Group 1-18-23-20B See Attachment D 22 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 133 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 *$28,483.00* Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 23 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 141 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F250 *$28,090.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 23 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 141 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 *$29,736.00* Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 24 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 350
HP, 153 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F250 *$29,213.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 24 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 350
HP, 153 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ram 2500 $27,276.46 Wondries Fleet Group 1-18-23-20E See Attachment D 24 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Crew Cab, Short Box, 350
HP, 153 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, GASOLINE
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 *$31,630.00* Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 25 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 141 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F250 *$34,716.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 25 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 141 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silerado 2500 *$36,850.00* Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 26 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 141 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F250 *$37,128.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 26 Full Size Pickup, 4x4, Extra Cab, Regular Box,
350 HP, 141 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 *$38,894.00* Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 27 Full Size Pickup, 4x2, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
133 in. WB, 8500 lb. GVWR, CNG Fueled Vehicle
in accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Ford F250 *$34,046.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 28 Full Size Pickup, 4X2, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
380 lb.-ft. Torque, 133 in. WB, 10200 lb. GVWR,
GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle in accordance with
specification 2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ford F350 *$27,418.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 28 Full Size Pickup, 4X2, Regular Cab, Regular Box,
380 lb.-ft. Torque, 133 in. WB, 10200 lb. GVWR,
GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle in accordance with
specification 2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 *$26,381.00* Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 29 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 380 lb.-
ft. Torque, 60 in. CA, 10200 lb. GVWR,
GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle in accordance with
specification 2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ford F350 *$25,932.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 4 Contact Line Item #
(CLIN) Description Freight on Board (FOB) UNSPSC Code Unit of Measure(UOM) Quantity in Unit of
Measure Make Model Vehicle Unit Price Maintenance Plan Contract Unit Price Dealer Contract Number Technical
Questionnaire
29 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 380 lb.-
ft. Torque, 60 in. CA, 10200 lb. GVWR,
GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle in accordance with
specification 2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ram 3500 $25,255.00 Elk Grove Auto Group 1-18-23-20B See Attachment D 29 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 380 lb.-
ft. Torque, 60 in. CA, 10200 lb. GVWR,
GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle in accordance with
specification 2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 *$26,512.00* Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 30 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 380 lb.-
ft. Torque, 60 in. CA, 15000 lb. GVWR,
GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle in accordance with
specification 2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ford F450 *$31,481.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 31 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 650 lb.-
ft. Torque, 60 in. CA, 15000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ford F450 *$39,615.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 31 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 650 lb.-
ft. Torque, 60 in. CA, 15000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 4500 $39,725.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 32 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 60 in.

CA, 15000 lb. GVWR, CNG Fueled Vehicle in
accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ford F450 *$44,763.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 33 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 380 lb.-
ft. Torque, 84 in. CA, 19500 lb. GVWR,
GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle in accordance with
specification 2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ford F550 *$33,992.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 33 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 380 lb.-
ft. Torque, 84 in. CA, 19500 lb. GVWR,
GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle in accordance with
specification 2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ram 5500 $31,389.00 Wondries Fleet Group 1-18-23-20E See Attachment D 34 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 650 lb.-
ft. Torque, 84 in. CA, 19500 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ford F550 *$42,098.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 34 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 650 lb.-
ft. Torque, 84 in. CA, 19500 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Chevrolet Silverado 5500 $41,950.00 Winner Chevrolet 1-18-23-20D See Attachment D 35 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 84 in.

CA, 19500 lb. GVWR, CNG Fueled Vehicle in
accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ford F550 *$47,246.00* Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 36 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 450 lb.-
ft. Torque, 102 in. CA, 25500 lb. GVWR,
GASOLINE Fueled Vehicle in accordance with
specification 2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ford F650 $44,464.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 37 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 660 lb.-
ft. Torque, 102 in. CA, 25500 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Freightliner M2 $62,018.00 Sacramento Truck Center 1-18-23-20I See Attachment D 37 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 660 lb.-
ft. Torque, 102 in. CA, 25500 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 International MV $61,344.95 Riverview International 1-18-23-20F See Attachment D 37 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 660 lb.-
ft. Torque, 102 in. CA, 25500 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Ford F650 $51,584.00 Downtown Ford Sales 1-18-23-20A See Attachment D 38 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 800 lb.-
ft. Torque, 108 in. CA, 30000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 International MV $68,569.15 Riverview International 1-18-23-20F See Attachment D 5 Contact Line Item #
(CLIN) Description Freight on Board (FOB) UNSPSC Code Unit of Measure(UOM) Quantity in Unit of
Measure Make Model Vehicle Unit Price Maintenance Plan Contract Unit Price Dealer Contract Number Technical
Questionnaire
38 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 800 lb.-
ft. Torque, 108 in. CA, 30000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 International HV $68,760.88 Riverview International 1-18-23-20F See Attachment D 38 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 800 lb.-
ft. Torque, 108 in. CA, 30000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Freightliner M2 $69,155.00 Sacramento Truck Center 1-18-23-20I See Attachment D 39 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 860 lb.-
ft. Torque, 120 in. CA, 33000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 International MV $69,329.14 Riverview International 1-18-23-20F See Attachment D 39 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 860 lb.-
ft. Torque, 120 in. CA, 33000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 International HV $68,760.88 Riverview International 1-18-23-20F See Attachment D 39 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 860 lb.-
ft. Torque, 120 in. CA, 33000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101600 Each 1 Freightliner M2 $69,834.00 Sacramento Truck Center 1-18-23-20I See Attachment D 40 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 4X2, Regular Cab, 120 in.

CA, 33000 lb. GVWR, CNG Fueled Vehicle in
accordance with specification 2310-4181 dated
11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Freightliner M2 $117,513.00 Sacramento Truck Center 1-18-23-20I See Attachment D 41 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 6X4, Regular Cab, 1150 lb.-
ft. Torque, 138 in. CA, 54000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 International HV $77,396.49 Riverview International 1-18-23-20F See Attachment D 41 Truck, Cab & Chassis, 6X4, Regular Cab, 1150 lb.-
ft. Torque, 138 in. CA, 54000 lb. GVWR, DIESEL
Fueled Vehicle in accordance with specification
2310-4181 dated 11/7/17.

Sacramento 25101507 Each 1 Freightliner M2 $78,853.00 Sacramento Truck Center 1-18-23-20I See Attachment D Contact Line Item #
(CLIN) Description
Unit of
Measure
(UOM)
Quantity in Unit of
Measure Make Model Manufacturer Contract Unit Price
n/a Additional options, (cost plus) various various n/a n/a n/a Dealer Cost + 10 % n/a Removal of options, (cost minus) various various n/a n/a n/a Dealer Cost + 10 % End of sheet
Contacts:

Downtown Ford Sales - (916) 442-6931
Freeway Toyota - (559) 707-5735
Winner Chevrolet - (916) 429-4700
Elk Grove Auto Group (916) 429-4700
Wondries Fleet Group (626) 457-5590
Riverview International Trucks (916) 669-0253
Selma Nissan (559) 707-5735
Sacramento Truck Center (916) 286-2013
The following items are applicable for options only. Not evaluated for award purposes. 6 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-156, Version: 1
District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program- San Juan Drive & San Andreas Way Opt Out Request Approve a Resolution approving the San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way (bounded by San Juan Circle & San Andreas Way) opt out of the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 4/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 12, 2022
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: ANDREW EASTERLING, TRAFFIC ENGINEER
TITLE: DISTRICT 3A RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING PROGRAMSAN JUAN DRIVE & SAN ANDREAS WAY OPT OUT REQUEST RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a resolution approving the San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way (bounded by San Juan Circle & San Andreas Way) opt out of the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program.

RECOMMENDATION:

At the request of the residents, staff recommends that the City Council approves a resolution approving the San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way (bounded by San Juan Circle & San Andreas Way) opt out of the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Staff received a signed petition from residents of San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way (bounded by San Juan Circle & San Andreas Way) to opt out of the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program. The petition received was confirmed by the City Staff to have met 51% threshold for consideration. Staff is recommending the approval of opt out requests from residents of San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way (bounded by San Juan Circle & San Andreas Way) from the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program.

BACKGROUND:

On December 1, 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2498 that established a preferential permit parking program in the City of Salinas. Along with the Ordinance, the Council also adopted Resolution 19778 establishing District 3A, this residential permit parking area aimed to provide relief for residents affected by non-residential parking intrusions into residential areas near and around Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital (SVMH).

Sections 20-216 (c) and (d) of the adopted Ordinance contains provisions for residents on a street within the program to opt out of the program if a petition representing fifty-one percent (51%) of Page | 2
the residences support the request. Staff received a request from the residents of San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way (bounded by San Juan Circle & San Andreas Way) to opt out of the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program. The petition received was confirmed by the City Staff to have met 51% threshold for consideration of an opt out petition (refer to attached petition).

Residents of this segment of San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way understand that their decision to opt out of the program may result in the following:

1. Not being able to re-enter the program for a two-year period.

2. Parking spill over may occur on their street.

If, in the future, residents of San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way elect by petition to and are eligible to re-enter the program, a new parking study may be required and residents will be required to pay the full implementation costs to re-enter the District at that time. The costs for re-entering the program may include the cost of a parking study, signs, street markings, permit issuance management, software/program changes, and any other costs related to add this segment back to the district.

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION:

The recommendation for the San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way (bounded by San Juan Circle & San Andreas Way) opt out of the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program was presented to the Traffic and Transportation Commission at its March 10, 2022 meeting. The Commission voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend to City Council to approve a resolution approving the San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way (bounded by San Juan Circle & San Andreas Way) opt out of the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program supports the Council of “Operation Efficiencies”.

Page | 3
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Signage for the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program are installed and maintained by public works staff. Parking enforcement is provided in coordination with parking enforcement staff (LAZ) and the Police Department.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The estimated labor to remove the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program signage is estimated to be $2,000.00. Sufficient funding is available in the current District 3A Residential Parking Permit Program, CIP 6802.50.5447, to fund proposed removal of parking signage.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Attachment 1: Copy of Petition
Attachment 2: Petition Opt Out Support Map
Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE REQUEST

FROM RESIDENTS FROM SAN JUAN DRIVE AND SAN ANDREAS WAY (BOUNDED

BY SAN JUAN CIRCLE AND SAN ANDREAS WAY) TO OPT OUT OF THE DISTRICT 3A RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, on December 1, 2009 the City adopted Ordinance No. 2498 and Resolution No. 19778 establishing Preferential Permit Parking Districts within the City of Salinas and establishing Residential Permit Parking District 3A, respectively; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Salinas City Code Sections 20-216 residents from a section of San Marcos Court greater than 51% of the residences of the area signed a petition to opt out of the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program; and
WHEREAS, at its March 10, 2022 meeting, the Traffic and Transportation Commission voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend to City Council to approve the request from residents of San Juan Drive and San Andreas Way (bounded by San Juan Circle and San Andreas Way) to opt out of the District 3A Residential Permit Parking Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the implementation and removal of parking restrictions is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1). The project consists of the operation, repair, or minor alteration of public streets involving no expansion of use. There would be no significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council that:

1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. Resolution No. 19778 is hereby amended to remove the following street segments from the list of streets incorporated into District 3A.

Street Boundary 1 Boundary 2
San Juan Drive San Juan Circle San Andreas Way
San Andreas Way San Juan Drive Cul-de-Sac

3. All street signs along property frontages installed for the establishment of Residential Permit Parking District 3A, shall be removed.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page | 2
ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
_______________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

21 25
3 7
22 26 100
www.invarion.com
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-161, Version: 1
Price Change to two F-350 Crew Cab Trucks Approved March 8, 2022 Resolution No. 22311 (N.C.S.) Approve a Resolution authorizing a price increase of $1,095.50 each or $2,185.00 total from Salinas Valley Ford to purchase two new F-350 Crew Cabs previously approved in Resolution No. 22311 (N.C.S).

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 4/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 12, 2022
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS, FLEET AND FACILITIES
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: RONALD PATTERSON, FLEET MAINTENANCE MANANGER
TITLE: PRICE CHANGE TO TWO F-350 CREW CAB TRUCKS
APPROVED MARCH 8, 2022 (RESOLUTION NO. 22311 (N.C.S.)
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

It is recommended that City Council approve a Resolution authorizing a price increase of $1,095.50 each or $2,185.00 total from Salinas Valley Ford to purchase two new F-350 Crew Cabs previously approved in resolution 22311.

RECOMMENDATION:

BACKGROUND:

Public Works Fleet provided Council with a report outlining the need to purchase two F-350 Crew Cabs and One Utility Service truck on March 8, 2022. Council authorized the purchase and approved Resolution number 22311 (N.C.S.).

The quote dated January 27, 2022 and received on January 31, 2022 was for a total price of $46,644.80. Since approval of the Resolution there was a price increase to $47,737.30 for a difference of $1,095.50 per vehicle. The pricing across all makes and models is fluctuating due to the vehicle markets short supply of both chips and vehicles.

The funds to make up the difference in cost will come from 7120.50.5233-66.5500 totaling $2,185.00.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

Page | 2
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The requested Council action directly relates to Council’s Strategic Plans or Goals of providing “Operational Efficiencies”. The purchase of the vehicle allows the Fleet and Facilities Divisions to maintain the city facilities and allow fleet to have a reliable service truck.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Fleet Maintenance, in coordination with Finance will work to ratify the purchase order.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Funds are appropriated and available the below expenditure account. (7120.50.5233-66.5500).

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
2022 Salinas Valley Ford Updated Quotes
RESOLUTION NO.____________(N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRICE INCREASE FOR TWO VEHICLES WHEREAS, on March 8, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 22311 (N.C.S.) authorizing the purchase of two F-350 Crew Cabs from Salinas Valley Ford for a total cost of $46,644.80; and
WHEREAS, Salinas Valley Ford’s pricing has increased since the time of their original quote and the City Council approval of the purchase in the amount of $1,095.50 each totaling $2,185.00 for a new total price of $47,737.30; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds are appropriated and available in 7120.50.5233-

66.5500 to cover the increased purchase cost.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves of the increase in cost to purchase the two vehicles approved in Resolution No. 22311 (N.C.S.) and authorizes the Purchasing Officer to amend the purchase order to reflect the increase in cost of $1,095.50 each for a new total cost of $47,737.30 each.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April 2022 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Prepared for: Mr. Ronald Patterson, City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Ave
Salinas, CA 93901
Office: 831-758-4297
2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 245
Client Proposal
Prepared by:

STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
Office: 831-444-4485
Quote ID: 0131221
Date: 01/31/2022
Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir , Salinas, CA, 93907 Office: 831-444-4485 | Fax: 831-758-9053
1 Prepared for: Mr. Ronald Patterson
City of Salinas
Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
01/31/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 245 | Quote ID: 0131221
Table of Contents
Description Page
Cover Page 1
Table of Contents 2
As Configured Vehicle 3
Pricing Summary - Single Vehicle 6
2 Prices and content availability as shown are subject to change and should be treated as estimates only. Actual base vehicle, package and option pricing may vary from this estimate because of special local pricing, availability or pricing adjustments not reflected in the dealer’s computer system. See salesperson for the most current information.

Prepared for: Mr. Ronald Patterson
City of Salinas
Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
01/31/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 245 | Quote ID: 0131221
As Configured Vehicle
Code Description MSRP
Base Vehicle
W3B Base Vehicle Price (W3B) $44,415.00
Packages
610A Order Code 610A N/C
Includes:
- Engine: 6.2L 2-Valve SOHC EFI NA V8 Flex-Fuel
- Transmission: TorqShift 10-Speed Automatic
Includes SelectShift and selectable drive modes: normal, tow/haul, eco, deep sand/snow and slippery.
- 3.73 Axle Ratio
- GVWR: 10,600 lb Payload Package
- Tires: LT245/75Rx17E BSW A/S (4)
Spare may not be the same as road tire.
- Wheels: 17" Argent Painted Steel
Includes painted hub covers/center ornaments.
- HD Vinyl 40/20/40 Split Bench Seat
Includes center armrest, cupholder, storage and driver's side manual lumbar. - Radio: AM/FM Stereo w/MP3 Player
Includes 4 speakers.
- SYNC Communications & Entertainment System
Includes enhanced voice recognition with 911 Assist, 4.2" LCD center stack screen, AppLink and 1 smart-charging USB-C port.

Powertrain
996 Engine: 6.2L 2-Valve SOHC EFI NA
V8 Flex-Fuel
Included
44G Transmission: TorqShift 10-Speed
Automatic
Included
Includes SelectShift and selectable drive modes: normal, tow/haul, eco, deep sand/snow and slippery.

X37 3.73 Axle Ratio Included
STDGV GVWR: 10,600 lb Payload Package Included
Wheels & Tires
TD8 Tires: LT245/75Rx17E BSW A/S (4) Included
Spare may not be the same as road tire.
64A Wheels: 17" Argent Painted Steel Included
Includes painted hub covers/center ornaments.

Seats & Seat Trim
3 Prices and content availability as shown are subject to change and should be treated as estimates only. Actual base vehicle, package and option pricing may vary from this estimate because of special local pricing, availability or pricing adjustments not reflected in the dealer’s computer system. See salesperson for the most current information.

Prepared for: Mr. Ronald Patterson
City of Salinas
Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
01/31/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 245 | Quote ID: 0131221
As Configured Vehicle (cont'd)
Code Description MSRP
A HD Vinyl 40/20/40 Split Bench Seat Included
Includes center armrest, cupholder, storage and driver's side manual lumbar.

Other Options
160WB 160" Wheelbase STD
96V XL Value Package $395.00
Includes:
- Bright Chrome Hub Covers & Center Ornaments
- Chrome Front Bumper
- Chrome Rear Step Bumper
- Steering Wheel-Mounted Cruise Control
90L Power Equipment Group $1,125.00
Deletes passenger-side lock cylinder. Includes upgraded door trim panel.

Includes:
- Accessory Delay
- Trailer Tow Mirrors w/Power Heated Glass
Includes manual folding, manually telescoping, heated convex spotter mirror and integrated clearance lamps/turn signals.
- Advanced Security Pack
Includes SecuriLock Passive Anti-Theft System (PATS) and inclination/intrusion sensors. - Power Locks
- Power Tailgate Lock
- Power Front & Rear Seat Windows
Includes 1-touch up/down driver/passenger window.
- Remote Keyless Entry
66B BoxLink $75.00
Includes 4 premium locking cleats and interface brackets. 67E 240 Amp Alternator $85.00
52B Trailer Brake Controller $270.00
Verified to be compatible with select electric over hydraulic brakes. Includes smart trailer tow connector.
18B Platform Running Boards $445.00
595 Halogen Fog Lamps $130.00
PAINT Monotone Paint Application STD
43C 110V/400W Outlet $175.00
Requires Extra Extra Heavy-Duty Alternator (67E) when ordered with Upfitter Switches (66S) and Snow Plow Pkg. (473) or Snow Plow/Camper Pkg. (47B).

Includes 1 in-dash mounted outlet.
587 Radio: AM/FM Stereo w/MP3 Player Included
Includes 4 speakers.
4 Prices and content availability as shown are subject to change and should be treated as estimates only. Actual base vehicle, package and option pricing may vary from this estimate because of special local pricing, availability or pricing adjustments not reflected in the dealer’s computer system. See salesperson for the most current information.

Prepared for: Mr. Ronald Patterson
City of Salinas
Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
01/31/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 245 | Quote ID: 0131221
As Configured Vehicle (cont'd)
Code Description MSRP
Includes:
- SYNC Communications & Entertainment System
Includes enhanced voice recognition with 911 Assist, 4.2" LCD center stack screen, AppLink and 1 smart-charging USB-C port.

Fleet Options
WARANT Fleet Customer Powertrain Limited
Warranty
N/C
Requires valid FIN code.

Ford is increasing the 5-year 60,000-mile limited powertrain warranty to 5-years, 100,000 miles.

Only Fleet purchasers with a valid Fleet Identification Number (FIN code) will receive the extended warranty. When the sale is entered into the sales reporting system with a sales type fleet along with a valid FIN code, the warranty extension will automatically be added to the vehicle. The extension will stay with the vehicle even if it is subsequently sold to a non-fleet customer before the expiration.

This extension applies to both gas and diesel powertrains. Dealers can check for the warranty extension on eligible fleet vehicles in OASIS. Please refer to the Warranty and Policy Manual section 3.13.00 Gas Engine Commercial Warranty. This change will also be reflected in the printed Warranty Guided distributed with the purchase of every new vehicle.

Emissions
425 50-State Emissions System STD
Interior Color
AS_01 Medium Earth Gray w/HD Vinyl
40/20/40 Split Bench Seat
N/C
Exterior Color
Z1_01 Oxford White N/C
SUBTOTAL $47,115.00
Destination Charge $1,695.00
TOTAL $48,810.00
5 Prices and content availability as shown are subject to change and should be treated as estimates only. Actual base vehicle, package and option pricing may vary from this estimate because of special local pricing, availability or pricing adjustments not reflected in the dealer’s computer system. See salesperson for the most current information.

Prepared for: Mr. Ronald Patterson
City of Salinas
Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
01/31/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 245 | Quote ID: 0131221
Pricing Summary - Single Vehicle
MSRP
Vehicle Pricing
Base Vehicle Price $44,415.00
Options $2,700.00
Colors $0.00
Upfitting $0.00
Fleet Discount $0.00
Fuel Charge $0.00
Destination Charge $1,695.00
Subtotal $48,810.00
Pre-Tax Adjustments
Code Description MSRP
098 Government and SVF Discount -$6,235.00
Subtotal $42,575.00
Sales Taxes
Code Description MSRP
2015 Sales Tax $3,946.05
Subtotal $46,521.05
Post-Tax Adjustments
Code Description MSRP
5454 DOC FEE $85.00
DOC Electronic Filing Fee $30.00
TIRE FEE TIRE FEE $8.75
Subtotal $46,644.80
Total $46,644.80
6 Prices and content availability as shown are subject to change and should be treated as estimates only. Actual base vehicle, package and option pricing may vary from this estimate because of special local pricing, availability or pricing adjustments not reflected in the dealer’s computer system. See salesperson for the most current information.

STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
Office: 831-444-4485
Date: 03/18/2022
Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir , Salinas, CA, 93907 Office: 831-444-4485 | Fax: 831-758-9053
1 Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
03/18/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 250
Table of Contents
Description Page
Cover Page 1
Table of Contents 2
As Configured Vehicle 3
Pricing Summary - Single Vehicle 6
2 Prices and content availability as shown are subject to change and should be treated as estimates only. Actual base vehicle, package and option pricing may vary from this estimate because of special local pricing, availability or pricing adjustments not reflected in the dealer’s computer system. See salesperson for the most current information.

Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
03/18/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 250
As Configured Vehicle
Code Description MSRP
Base Vehicle
W3B Base Vehicle Price (W3B) $45,415.00
Packages
610A Order Code 610A N/C
Includes:
- Engine: 6.2L 2-Valve SOHC EFI NA V8 Flex-Fuel
- Transmission: TorqShift 10-Speed Automatic
Includes SelectShift and selectable drive modes: normal, tow/haul, eco, deep sand/snow and slippery.
- 3.73 Axle Ratio
- GVWR: 10,600 lb Payload Package
- Tires: LT245/75Rx17E BSW A/S (4)
Spare may not be the same as road tire.
- Wheels: 17" Argent Painted Steel
Includes painted hub covers/center ornaments.
- HD Vinyl 40/20/40 Split Bench Seat
Includes center armrest, cupholder, storage and driver's side manual lumbar. - Radio: AM/FM Stereo w/MP3 Player
Includes 4 speakers.
- SYNC Communications & Entertainment System
Includes enhanced voice recognition with 911 Assist, 4.2" LCD center stack screen, AppLink and 1 smart-charging USB-C port.

Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
03/18/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 250
As Configured Vehicle (cont'd)
Code Description MSRP
A HD Vinyl 40/20/40 Split Bench Seat Included
Includes center armrest, cupholder, storage and driver's side manual lumbar.

Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
03/18/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 250
As Configured Vehicle (cont'd)
Code Description MSRP
Includes:
- SYNC Communications & Entertainment System
Includes enhanced voice recognition with 911 Assist, 4.2" LCD center stack screen, AppLink and 1 smart-charging USB-C port.

Fleet Options
WARANT Fleet Customer Powertrain Limited
Warranty
N/C
Requires valid FIN code.

Ford is increasing the 5-year 60,000-mile limited powertrain warranty to 5-years, 100,000 miles.

Emissions
425 50-State Emissions System STD
Interior Color
AS_01 Medium Earth Gray w/HD Vinyl
40/20/40 Split Bench Seat
N/C
Exterior Color
Z1_01 Oxford White N/C
SUBTOTAL $48,115.00
Destination Charge $1,695.00
TOTAL $49,810.00
5 Prices and content availability as shown are subject to change and should be treated as estimates only. Actual base vehicle, package and option pricing may vary from this estimate because of special local pricing, availability or pricing adjustments not reflected in the dealer’s computer system. See salesperson for the most current information.

Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
03/18/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 250
Pricing Summary - Single Vehicle
MSRP
Vehicle Pricing
Base Vehicle Price $45,415.00
Options $2,700.00
Colors $0.00
Upfitting $0.00
Fleet Discount $0.00
Fuel Charge $0.00
Destination Charge $1,695.00
Subtotal $49,810.00
Pre-Tax Adjustments
Code Description MSRP
092x Government and SVF Discount -$6,235.00
Subtotal $43,575.00
Sales Taxes
Code Description MSRP
2015 Sales Tax $4,038.55
Subtotal $47,613.55
Post-Tax Adjustments
Code Description MSRP
5454 DOC FEE $85.00
ELEC ELECTRONIC FILING FEE $30.00
TIRE FEE TIRE FEE $8.75
Subtotal $47,737.30
Total $47,737.30
6 Prices and content availability as shown are subject to change and should be treated as estimates only. Actual base vehicle, package and option pricing may vary from this estimate because of special local pricing, availability or pricing adjustments not reflected in the dealer’s computer system. See salesperson for the most current information.

Prepared by: STEPHEN ROTHSTEIN
03/18/2022 Salinas Valley Ford Trucks | 1100 Auto Center Cir Salinas CA | 93907 2022 F-350 4x4 SD Crew Cab 6.75' box 160" WB SRW XL (W3B) Price Level: 250
Pricing Summary - Single Vehicle
Customer Signature Acceptance Date
7 (^:NN
ci
-(=NC2G-(oCnlCT
iTC7c
rT7Cc2
6 Cir
{'""}
i,::'1
"1]
1".i i
i"iJ
i]
i!
il
r_\
r,gi :{ **+ ,!.s c;i Li"?
l-' u=r", ). ["'..1 H" i-] t]
*, t* ;3 :P '"f: +i (-) *-'s i''"'""1 T
*-5
[i
]
L*-- ^'ff i,"t " --; o "
--* E. '< el;
*--t
-'-t':
#
'fJl
g " r"* (:: i} .}= .}>' }{ :'= ni ;A ,:}<
i=i"' L-ni f:, -,2:
r,:-ff :fr "-*i --*, i i iE -"i r'-'- fT'I tr
*< '=rl {} t/t i*
*
uj i_j i"ril i","!
"-"i*i
;.,?
*tT
F.*"t |*- e_}
::: f*
{tf i3T .1.:=
-'L":
i'=* *E;
*j ij: X}
--r 5 F*1 tir f--]} -*, f*! ;J; tr*i:i H-: -ta, i:] g
r*t
*x -=;
s: i"l ryi
=;
g: r-+ {;"} t} :g "{
'.'-'} "'-:
ryl ;ri i:;1 *:-l :11>
-'1-i 'E H ffi L: l"ii
.-* € F"fi +
(= *;
,1* <;
*
i.i'-, k ++ i"^-] ffi !=*i :-
, t."i H ilfi t"} )> '"-'*
h:q :j-:, H* "--i -*.' F-'1
*tl
:ff f-lj l*'1 r"-- ;i;v*
r:' fl Fni
"
{J <: i-:
*'-i **i '--.
--i [i;r E"r--i f-]
,{:; *:} !": .i}" lff {:,X} r-" F...{
-{i
:i:
j:. l-r': ;tr g fj:
-
{} !'i:-i l,ii .E= ;":.E
,:3 :F.I
.;)' tl? --.. i.4
*:
l*j it-
'";2.
i':i #'i ["fi {n r'r
*i"]
--*-
".-A i")
=j
f-i: ;{::i Lrl "-".
*:
"".".i *-} :?:i
*ii
:-"'r"
_,,sq.
,",1] i":, {:}
j:'
';'t-'l ri"
-*1
,'*s ,|::.
*"{ i*r
'
---l S::* l'.,.* I*l r'*'
1* .iff A: :2"
=a
--i i="i c*
1"r;
tSl ;4, ff fl i"-': ';.r!
!""'* Lrj
i,tj
{i
f_i
,ln
f-:: !
i":.i
-J--,
"F.
i-r]
LN
S
="':
*r:

O "h5
*'3
6\ 3i li
{sx
r fff*
tr*t- !*r
=='83 O l-'" W{+
rTl p
*4
=: >UT!i
!,
t--t 3>
(.n *-
r'1
>*
I 5 lt
F f-*" it"l Wf3: {I
*ri
lor*#
rT1fu fN
o '-l o*l u
.T]
*lt*t
{}
r}
r*I
I-"i-!
=l
i'-1 1
i':"i
:;#
ff
i:i
'-i''j
f''i
{ix
t.:--,
tr:ix
L-,,..-,:
't.i
^.-?
i-r,i
,..i:"
t---i
h..
!
!.., i
['.,1
"T".l
a.*
i-*-:
f-ae!
; rii
l*=
-_..L-,
,rlr
\.j
r" '\
-!.5 -i*!,
irl ir
1 {!
"'=I
""1
"*,r.r
';
."-4
:A t.--/'
f? r"ii
--' tj"'i
,,.,,-.r
-'{ji
."'.,{
-n f1 "-t
:=: t*-'i'r i;i f:" ,'-:" :".Q
-.;:"
-,i=
4: iI', i>
."-"i
.i>.
.*i i,+ r-)
.--{ f-.:f, :='-* !":'i
"'", *:{ f,"1 r"T"t i--'- i;i r-*
-t\. ]..i"
rEh ;t"] i*tr i-*i ---1
"{"r1
sI} .---i i:=: fi:1 a-='i 7;;1
{i r"?r {:"1 ;r,i F;: i-r"l <;;
H-
-aI ;:: ;iI'I $ '--j
f'-i-t fi: i':i
--:.*
i.,n :Ei {;J
r:3 g tr ;.i: :fi {11 =""'4 .#=
--.-. -;
a._: i.:l;
'-:{ {-il
-t"
i..,*
'a;
?-
=
t;ti ;d [I;-; .,:r] :'1''i
. -l 1.',
: -; --. i'.
:
*F"
"+: ;x 7: :;*.
(*"i"1
r-'-i {*'l f"-t
\
-*ia,
"-.i Ef
{"f,1 r.-"r
''t'i

1.,,r-j
;i
,,.:i.
r-i":
'*i--r
-\r:
i,il .n"
-"4'a
.-*.:,
ii
iii
""-i
'i.:*r c
".tJ
it
f)t
'-.
!
'".
,
i.*iI
-*1i
t1
*;1
i--tt
E:Y
i: ..,,
!-?' i
7'j
L*i
,J! *-*!
;H
l-r :'
.irs
-:

L]
---i
r'.*'i
-,1.=.
=-1
--== i*1'
r_. ,t
\!1
-J
,I;"
F"*,i
i.*..'
!*-l
,
!!
;'!"1
:il" +,ts
f;1:3
s.i"^-
=3i
I it
'-i-'i
q;]
i=fi
t"--J
;.jj
i!
{"-}
i"1-i
.*.tj
-F
L: .1
I i5
-1".
t7\l>
)-DDt,
\)
-lI1))l:otnD
r)tfL
'l)
\)
B
1=.J
r#
r.J
lr.J
uNN
-t
i'*1
,=
-ri,l
U;
ii.
:1 n!
lh
fa
'=
i.*;
i,..i-i x
-i""1
\' -., ;,,
\
''
"':
;.-i\
i.l;
i. ll
*rql
t;
re*t
1r\ F4
i;
,\J
1t
f*
-*3;
ffi
f=*
*..-
!
\J
*"")
Lfi
J
{5
*r: . }i r."i ffi} t*
*ri x
*4 {ff L,',}
rrr ff fla r e * 3" tr F-"j r'fr re
*ffi
L,} E-ffire *>{fl}#} ryFJ>
*-4r*ffi< r*";E ffifriffire
F*4 }, )e t*"-* f: ffi ffi n:
3:' f] t*r: r* ffi ffi F
*-4 *"4
ffi ffi r';= e
'=F
ffi K
**i f-\
*{
ff3 >:- r-?-: ru L;i ff) i-**
ree-} F. tfi:"{ffiffim
ffi! #} ffi
*# $"* # l*."{ *-'i ETl
rTrrfiffix*4
*#reffi\
r* G*:re c#€
i*4 ffi ffi r*=3r:ff
{ e}
*"1 ffi H a** r**
5** re reffiFir"#
=
U. NC2G-t
()
(^c
rTfarT7c
rT7Ccz
da"
{*} I
!-T:
ffi
:"tr
c-
-1
!!
ffi
?s!
t*"i
L*;
"E
iEt
e:
=ffi
"*-3
'!\
l,' {3 Lo-:
ft f* =--"3
# T}ftJ
\\
**ra! F* hJ
r *G fl* ;qj
#{E=
flB {*,
r* i-rJ t:
"
*+"i "j
* f-i {",1}
l*t
*4.:
"fa=
" "
l-\- *-$ =j K
tJ
ff1
*;c
*\ *\
i*
**s
>E
*3
f*]
L&
rr LJ
't
-fi !-rr? =ir.
*J
q<
#
IB
##
n "r*'"*';
h'j
I+*
F
-T1
r*
r
r-J f ft
-x $Yi
3F
=3 a""i !
:*fi
#]
ffi
ffi
reffi
t!t
'%
l-:J ev
*-.i E t*{
P_%]&ffi
L.*i!J{ lI I l!
{
*5*
: ia ;*1
-*4.
llj ffi
# t'*)
't
i-:"j
t$ ** \-}
l"fi
.;fr UT I
.-d_E 5
LtrI
;*i
{-j} %
{g*
--*d
i:!
*?
:*;
'_:e **
q=,
q-*J
L*J
I r!
=
"2
t
F-Y=rt
,.-l ft\
":
i r:
!
x*
Pi I :iiJIiIli ,)DIl)
).DDtl,o
.l)a))l:ot
1l E;T3L
l)
L-;
t-,i.':
hj I
zlt
JeluolsnJ :auoLld
Jourolsnl
lleu:l
raurolsnf ssEJppv
Joulo]9nJ :aureN
0r86?s
VN
0r86r$
dSsrAr
lVIOl
slNfloSsro
lvlor lsvS oNV sNotldo
]X UOf,:lO lg$lf,Vd
Af, lNlrll3gvNvr^tIOl
U]INUI 9NIMOI 39VXf,Vd
80r T# utouo
uSAAod lNSyrdlnos dnou9
E{'€ Otlvu u\flng3[ rlxv
il.ru9r./Sr,Z11' S€ /l NOSVIS-]IV
Orlds-ol srlVWOInV
Hl'lZ'9' 8-n 3Nt9N3
lJlrltv' l olulls )l'p/gdhr
3J3 l3UJ gNrNOujcNOf * utv'
]x' hilul
oluu3jlud rNlr^rdtnDS voI9'9)td
WnrOtW HIUVS AVU9
llNl^ 0rl0zl0? Srvls
0uoJxo :tltHiv\
09r HlNl 3sv8133HA
ot€l ?,xt iv\3uf, €v3 091/dn)frd
NOlIdtUf,SltO
rauolsnS euuN f, svNllvs
NlHd3IS Nlll-SHlOU
'deg.ra;eag
dlqs,rateao :eureN seulles Ae1ptr plog
s6er$
0$
0$
0$
s6E$
s8s
E/s
0$
0€rs
0s
0s
aLzs
0$
sr.T$
o$
o5
s?rs
dUSW
NorlvNlls3ct E lul^lllc
olf,lud vuo0
13nJ tguvt{f,
lstnu]' 10u1N03
]x tnlv^ 39\.r3vd
otz dr^rv uolvNErI]v
)tNllxog
)tf,vf
ooJ sdhr\fl
ut1N3) H91H lNnohl dols dwv]
1I otH/uiv10d-Euth,l gts 9Nd3$1131
utltvul 3)vu€ utl]ouLNof,
"r31HM
IUVdS lUtr oNV
A{00rlA0rI I]IjnO
05 lrvls sNotsslhlS
#0090r 9 ufl\ tswf,vd
wuo{\nd gNrNNnu s0uvo€
NOlldlu]s!lo
0s
0$
o$
0$
9ZII$
0$
0$
o$
o$
o$
o$
o$
0s
0$
0s
o$
o$
EI'5rS
dushl
arljd la^41
rapro aPof, 829€
zza|.

AlnpradnS
rea lapow
oplqe^ ?u!l
ZZOz./gl/Eo 67.15r:60
:/$a!^erd eutl ,o
,narf, qef, gs :A r{leurun5;epr6 s€/v\ ,x, ma!^atd ropro gzg€ - opofsales : zltzu
3 SVNIIVS Et:6'zzteut wv
/vlol^o.ld lopJo 8zge
- g€A rx, MoJ3 qeC -MUS
opof,AuJoud 0I
adll ltEle5
@ffi@
et
:auoqd.leuolsn]
reuo$n) :lrew:l
Jail]olsnl :ssaJppv
JauolsnJ :auJsN
lVtor
ilNnof,sro
1v101 3sv8 oNV sNotldo
]-NoHJ l5Nr3l1 31\nd Ir)r3vu€
Al rNshBgVNVrArIOl
ulllvur ll^Or 9N lovrf,vd
80f r# u:louo
ul/rAod ,ldrnbl tN3l dnoug
€1.'t ollvu uiln9lu 3'rxv
3ZrUSl./gr'ZI1' SS A NOSVIS-'r]V
oSlds-or f,rrvl^lolnv
lJl1Z'9' 8.^ 3NlgNl
r\llll^lv' otulls r )fif/tdl
UIV' 9NlNOll.lONOS - f,1f, l:lUJ
Nlurlx'
03uulj3ud rnu3 INrr/!d v0I9'9)d
hlnloltll HIUVS AVU9
lANrA otlozlor slvrs
ouojxo iliHta
091 Hf,Nl lSVg133H/v1
oEEl rxt MSuS 8vf, 0gr/dnx3td
NOlrdtuf,slo
arxBN f svNllvs
raluolsn]
NlHdllS NEISHIOU
'dauraleao
pJoJ
^ellen
d;qua1ee6 :aueN sBulles
0I86r$
VN
0r86r$
dush,l
569r9
0s
0$
0$
55€$
58$
sr$
o$
0€x$
0$
0$
o/z$
0s
sl.r$
o$
0s
sw$
0$
dusw
ll-S30 NOIIVN 8 AUrAll3o
613lud vuoo
llnJ rguvHf,
3stnu3' loulNof,
lmv^-lx lov)lvd
orz dt^Iv uotvNulllv
)Nnxos
)t3vf
90J sdhtvl
U]IN]) H9IH INNOW dOIS dw\fl
9Ndf,S]'l3J tr Od-Uulvrl 0IH/UA 9ls
u31lvu1 lxvus url.lourNoS
IUVdS lull qNV ltlHIA
00f/A0rr l I]ltno
09 rlvrs sNorsslw3
#0090I u/v\49 lgv)f,vd
iluoJ-Llnd gNtNNnu souvoS
IX UOIIO 39U)Vd
NO[dtu]src
0s
0s
0$
0$
EZII$
0$
0$
o$
0s
0$
0$
o$
0s
o5
0s
o$
o$
slrtrs
l dust
a)ud ls^el
Jepro opo,
7207,
Alnpraclns
rea^ lepow
alrlqen au!] L79E
stiLi:6ozzozlSllEo
:Mar^ard eu,ll ,o
rne!^erd rapro 'zz9€ 8€I ?xr
r$eJf qef, :[lus ;ap:g tueturun5
sales opo) : zlnzLJ
c svNl']vs
qec Us
-A
^^al3
geM ,xt l"y:6 NV /v\ol^srd ropro zzge
-
'ZZtgLlt,
a{l^r
spof,^ulolrd 0I
flBlau @
@,ffi
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-162, Version: 1
Bardin Safe Routes to School Project, CIP 9218
Approve a Resolution(s) approving Contract Change Order No. 9 to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218, Federal Project ATPL-5045(031), in the amount of $275,244.00; and approving Contract Change Order No. 10 to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218, Federal Project ATPL-5045(031), in the amount of $184,478.37; and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 4/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 12, 2022
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, P.E., L.S., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
THRU: ADRIANA ROBLES, P.E., CITY ENGINEER
BY: ELISE RAMIREZ, P.E., SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER
TITLE: BARDIN ROAD SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS,
PROJECT NO. 9218
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution to:
1) Approve Contract Change Order No. 9 to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218, Federal Project ATPL5045(031), in the amount of $275,244.00 and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents related to Change Order No. 9; and
2) Approve Contract Change Order No. 10 to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218, Federal Project ATPL5045(031), in the amount of $184,478.37 and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents related to Change Order No. 10; and RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution for the City Manager to execute Contract Change Orders No. 9 and 10 to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218, Federal Project ATPL-5045(031) in the amount of $275,244.00 and $184,478.37, respectively, for a total amount equal to $459,722.37 and; authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents authorizing Change Orders 9 and

10. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On November 17, 2020, City Council approved Resolution No. 22000 awarding a construction contract to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218 in the amount of $7,941,211.00. Following execution of the contract and initiation of the project, construction of the project commenced on March 15, 2021.

Page | 2
BACKGROUND:

The Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements (Bardin SRTS) project aims to transform Bardin Road into a multi-modal “complete street” corridor by improving pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular facilities along Bardin Road, between Williams Road and Sconberg Parkway.

Additionally, the project will improve the intersections at Bardin Road/East Alisal Street and at Sconberg Parkway/Alisal Road by constructing a double roundabout system. Creating a dedicated drop-off zone for Bardin Elementary School and channelizing through traffic to enhance student safety. The project adds buffered bicycle lanes along Bardin Road, between Williams Road and East Alisal Street, provides pedestrian ramps where none existed, and enhances crosswalks at key intersections within the project limits. The pavement along Bardin Road will be rehabilitated and a segment at East Alisal Street (between Tampa Street and east of Margaret Street) will receive slurry seal. The safety for all road users (pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers) will be greatly improved by installing these improvements.

The Bardin SRTS project commenced on March 15, 2021 and is currently under construction with an anticipated completion of Summer 2022. To date, the contractor has completed approximately 65% of the contract work and has utilized approximately 65% of the contract time. The project has executed eight (8) Contract Change Orders, totaling a dollar amount of $96,834.00 or 12% of the authorized project contingency of $794,121.10 per Resolution 22000.

To date, all Contract Change Orders (CCO 1 thru CCO 8) have been within the signing authority as outlined by Department Policy 75-1 (Resolution No. 21528), see Table 1 for their respective dollar amounts.

Table 1: Contract Change Order Contingency Utilization Log Department Policy 75-1, Item 3, states City Council approval and authorization is required for Contract Change Orders of more than $100,000.00, or 10% of the total contract amount. Based CCO No. Amount
Contingency
Expended
(Cumulative)
Contingency
Remaining
CCO 1 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 744,121.10
*CCO 2 $ - $ 50,000.00 $ 744,121.10
CCO 3 $ 3,500.00 $ 53,500.00 $ 740,621.10
CCO 4 $ 4,000.00 $ 57,500.00 $ 736,621.10
CCO 5 $ 28,675.00 $ 86,175.00 $ 707,946.10
CCO 6 $ 3,800.00 $ 89,975.00 $ 704,146.10
CCO 7 $ 1,889.20 $ 91,864.20 $ 702,256.90
CCO 8 $ 4,970.00 $ 96,834.20 $ 697,286.90
CCO 9 $ 275,244.00 $ 372,078.20 $ 422,042.90
CCO 10 $ 184,478.37 $ 556,556.57 $ 237,564.53
*No dollar amount associated with CCO.

Page | 3
on Department Policy 75-1, Contract Change Orders No. 9 and 10 require City Council approval prior to execution by the City Manager, their descriptions are as follows:

Contract Change Order No. 9 (CCO No. 9):

Due to excessively deteriorated asphalt in locations proposed to be slurry sealed by the original project scope, the contractor submitted a Request for Information (RFI) and recommended the areas deemed too deteriorated for surface treatment (slurry seal), be reevaluated or considered for a more long-lasting pavement rehabilitation method. At the direction of the City Engineer, the contractor removed portions of the area in question to determine if more extensive pavement rehabilitation was required. The project team determined the pavement was too deteriorated to be a good candidate for slurry seal as originally proposed. Typically, slurry sealing is a pavement preservation method, where the existing pavement is determined to be in fair or good condition.

Based on field observations and findings, it was determined to extend the limits of full depth reclamation (FDR) along Alisal Road between Bardin Road and Margaret Street, eliminating the slurry seal and rehabilitating the roadway via FDR.

CCO No. 9 (Exhibit A) adjusts the originally planned roadway cross section from slurry sealing to full depth reclamation (FDR), extends the limits of the FDR, and adjusts the roadway section to meet City Standards. CCO No. 9 provides a credit for the contract price of the slurry seal. The total cost for CCO No. 9 is $275,244.00. There is no change to contract time for this change order.

Contract Change Order No. 10 (CCO No. 10):

The City issued Contract Change Order No 1 (CCO 1) upon discovery of unsuitable soils within Phase 1 of the Bardin SRTS Project pavement limits. Furthermore, CCO 1 anticipated the potential for unsuitable soils within future phases. At the conclusion of the work, additional material was needed to mitigate the unsuitable soils discovered in the Phase 2.

CCO No. 10 (Exhibit B), addresses the additional roadway excavation, off haul, disposal, and mitigation needed to complete the work due to the unsuitable soils discovered. The total cost for CCO No. 10 is $184,478.37. There is no change to contract time within this change order.

The combined total of CCO No. 9 and CCO No. 10 is $459,722.37. The addition of these two CCO’s would bring the new total for all project Contract Change Orders to date to $556,556.37 or 70% of the authorized 10% contingency amount, see Table 1.

City staff recommends City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 9 and 10 to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218, Federal Project ATPL-5045(031), in the amount of $275,244.00 and $184,478.37, respectively; and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents related to Change Orders No. 9 and 10.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Statutory Exemptions. City of Salinas has determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301(c) “Existing facilities”, Class1) because the project proposes to repair, maintain, and alter existing facilities. Class 1 categorically exempts the repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public facilities Page | 4
involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency’s determination. Section 15301(c) of the CEQA Guidelines states that the types of “existing facilities” include, but are not limited to, existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails and similar facilities.

Furthermore, as a result of the federal grant, the project required compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The State has determined that this project has no significant impacts on the environment as defined by the NEPA, and that there are no unusual circumstances as described in 23 CFR 771.117(b) and in 23 CFR 771.117(c): activity (c)(3).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The project supports City Council’s Goals of Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability and Public Safety. These improvements incorporate low impact development (LID) features and provide “green streets” infrastructure while enhancing pedestrian safety and increasing connectivity, mobility, and access for transit users and pedestrians.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Public Works staff and Finance staff have collaborated on the funding of the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements Project.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There is no new funding being requested by the approval of CCO No. 9 or CCO No. 10 as they are within the authorized project contingency per Resolution No. 22000.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution CCO 9
Resolution CCO 10
Exhibit A – Contract Change Order No. 9
Exhibit B – Contract Change Order No. 10
Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

BARDIN ROAD SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS,
PROJECT NO. 9218, CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 9
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2020, City Council approved a Resolution 22000 awarding a construction contract to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218 in the amount of $7,941,211.00. The project commenced on March 15, 2021 and is currently 65% complete; and
WHEREAS, Department Policy 75-1, Item 3, states City Council approval and authorization is required for Contract Change Orders of more than $100,000.00, or 10% of the total contract amount; and
WHEREAS, the project has executed eight (8) Contract Change Orders, totaling a dollar amount of $96,834.00 which are within the signing authority as outlined by Department Policy 75-1 (Resolution No. 21528); and
WHEREAS, based on Department Policy 75-1, Contract Change Order No. 9 requires City Council approval prior to execution by the City Manager; and WHEREAS, Contract Change Order No. 9 adjusts the originally planned roadway cross section from slurry seal to full depth reclamation (FDR) along a portion of Alisal Road, extends the limits of the FDR, and adjusts the roadway section for a total cost of $275,244.00, with no time adjustment; and
WHEREAS, City staff recommends City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 9 to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218, Federal Project ATPL-5045(031), in the amount of $275,244.00 and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents related to Change Order No. 9.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves Contract Change Order No. 9 to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218, Federal Project ATPL-5045(031), in the amount of $275,244.00 and authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents related to Change Order No.

9. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page | 2
ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
_______________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

BARDIN ROAD SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS,
PROJECT NO. 9218, CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 10
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2020, City Council approved a Resolution 22000 awarding a construction contract to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218 in the amount of $7,941,211.00. The project commenced on March 15, 2021 and is currently 65% complete; and WHEREAS, Department Policy 75-1, Item 3, states City Council approval and authorization is required for Contract Change Orders of more than $100,000.00, or 10% of the total contract amount; and
WHEREAS, the project has executed eight (8) Contract Change Orders, totaling a dollar amount of $96,834.00 which are within the signing authority as outlined by Department Policy 75-1 (Resolution No. 21528); and
WHEREAS, based on Department Policy 75-1, Contract Change Order No. 10 requires City Council approval prior to execution by the City Manager; and WHEREAS, CCO No. 10 addresses the additional roadway excavation, off haul, disposal, and mitigation needed to complete work from the discovery of unsuitable soils within the project limits for a total cost of $184,478.37, with no time adjustment; and WHEREAS, City staff recommends City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 10 to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218, Federal Project ATPL-5045(031), in the amount of $184,478.37 and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents related to Change Order No. 10.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves Contract Change Order No. 10 to the Don Chapin Company, Inc. for the Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements, Project No. 9218, Federal Project ATPL-5045(031), in the amount of $184,478.37 and authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents related to Contract Change Order No. 10.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Page | 2
APPROVED:
_______________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
City of Salinas
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • 200 Lincoln Ave • Salinas, California 93901 (831) 758-7241 • (831) 758-7935 (Fax) • www.ci.salinas.ca.us CCO No 09 Alisal St Pavement Improvements Elimination of Temp final Bardin Rd SRTS, Project No. 9218, ATPL-5045(031) Page 1 of 4

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
Change Order No. 09

Date: 03/04/2022 Vendor No.: 14414 P.O. No.: 2021-00002603

Vendor/Contractor: The Don Chapin Company Inc. Project No. 9218, ATPL-5045(031)

Project Title: Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements Project No. 9218

The changes described and noted herein are hereby authorized. The signed original of this order is on file at the office of the City Engineer.

Change requested by: Resident Engineer
ITEM 1 – MODIFY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (RFI 072): Perform work necessary to modify the street structural section detail for base failure repair from 0.50’ HMA (Type A) and 0.25’ AB (Class 2) to 0.25’ HMA (Type A) and 0.50’ AB (Class 2) at Alisal Street between “C” Line station 10+34.88 to station 12+96.68 as shown in response to RFI 72. Staff understands there is a potential to encounter unsuitable soils in this area given the issue has been encountered nearby; however, staff will prepare a separate CCO if unsuitable soils are encountered within this work zone.

METHOD OF PAYMENT:

ADJUSTMENT OF COMPENSATION AT AGREED UNIT PRICE (AC@UP): All labor, equipment, and materials associated with base failure repair, with a total volume of 771 sy, will be performed at agreed unit price.

For this work, the contractor shall be paid the agreed unit price of $200/sy. This sum constitutes full compensation, including all applicable markups.

Base Failure Repair ………………………………………………… + 771 sy @ $200/sy = $154,200.00 INCREASE/DECRAESE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT CONTRACT UNIT RATES:

Item 019 Base Failure Repair ……………………………………Ͳ120 sy (Ͳ100%) @ $200/sy = <$24,000.00> Item 050 Slurry Seal Type II (Base Bid 1ͲSchedule A)…Ͳ1,283 sy (Ͳ100%) @ $7.00/sy =<$8,981.00> TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ITEM 1 ………………………………………………………………………………………………$121,219.00 ITEM 2 –FULL DEPTH ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION AT ALISAL ST NEAR MARGARET ST (RFI 072): Perform work necessary to reconstruct roadway at Alisal Street and provide same structural section as typical section in the project between Sta 121+68.29 and Sta 125+32.50 (A1 Line), including a portion of Margaret Street. Typical pavement structural section: 0.17’ HMA (Type B), 0.33 HMA (Type A), and 1.10’ AB (Class II).

METHOD OF PAYMENT:
ADJUSTMENT OF COMPENSATION AT AGREED UNIT PRICE (AC@UP): All labor, equipment, and materials associated with roadway excavation (assumed 4 inches of additional excavation), aggregate base, type A hot mix CCO No 09 Alisal St Pavement Improvements Elimination of Temp final Bardin Rd SRTS, Project No. 9218, ATPL-5045(031) Page 2 of 4 asphalt, and type B hot mix asphalt for the construction of typical structural section will be performed at agreed unit price. This includes installation of three (3) storm drain inlet insert filters at both bulb-outs on Margaret Street. This sum constitutes full compensation, including all applicable markups.

Roadway Excavation ………………………………………………+750 cy @ $63/cy $47,250.00 Aggregate Base (Class II) ………………………………………… +427 cy @ $90/cy $38,430.00 Type A HMA (4”) …………………………………………………… +262 ton @$170/ton $44,540.00 Type B HMA (2”) …………………………………………………… +131 ton @$155/ton $20,305.00 Storm drain inlet insert filter ………………………………… 4 @ $3,000/EA $12,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ITEM 2 ……………………………………………………………………………………………$162,525.00 ITEM 3 – ELIMINATE TEMPORARY INSTALLATION OF ROUNDABOUT AT INTERSECTION OF MONTEBELLA BOULEVARD AND SCONBERG PARKWAY (RIF 012): In response to RFI 012, City directed contractor to not install the temporary roundabout at the intersection of Monte Bella and Sconberg Parkway. City has determined that this temporary roundabout installation is not needed. For this work, the Contractor shall be compensated to address stock on hand cost for the signs which were already manufactured for the temporary installation of this roundabout. Compensation shall be addressed as a separate contract change order.

METHOD OF PAYMENT:

INCREASE/DECRAESE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT CONTRACT UNIT RATES:

Item 025 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) (min RAB fill) ………Ͳ19 ton (Ͳ100%) @ $500/ton =<$9,500.00> Item 026 Hot Mix Asphalt Dike (Type A) ……………………Ͳ6 ton (Ͳ100%) @ $650/ton =<$3,900.00> Item 027 Hot Mix Asphalt Dike (Type E) ……………………Ͳ4 ton (Ͳ100%) @ $900/ton =<$3,600.00> TOTAL ESTIMATED CREDIT ITEM 3 …………………………………………………………………………………………<$17,000.00> ITEM 4 – REDUCE FULL DEPTH CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION AT SCONBERG PARKWAY (RFI 073): In response to RFI 073, City agreed with contractor that existing pavement conditions along Sconberg Parkway warranted certain areas to be left in place which resulted in credits/adjustment in quantities for roadway excavation (bid item 008), aggregate base (bid item 021), and type A hot mix asphalt (bid item 022). Original quantities to bid items 008, 021, and 022 will not be adjusted until completion of project via a balancing change order.

METHOD OF PAYMENT:
EXTRA WORK AT AGREED LUMP SUM (EW@LS): All labor, equipment, and materials associated with roadway excavation and aggregate base for the construction of typical structural section will be performed at agreed unit price. This sum constitutes full compensation, including all applicable markups.

Conform Grind/Prep ……………………………………………Lump Sum @ $8,500 $8,500.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ITEM 4 …………………………………………………………………………………………… $8,500.00 TOTAL INCREASE THIS CCO ……………………………………………………………………………………$275,244.00 City of Salinas
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • 200 Lincoln Ave • Salinas, California 93901 (831) 758-7241 • (831) 758-7935 (Fax) • www.ci.salinas.ca.us CCO No 09 Alisal St Pavement Improvements Elimination of Temp final Bardin Rd SRTS, Project No. 9218, ATPL-5045(031) Page 3 of 4 TIME ADJUSTMENT:
No adjustment of contract time is warranted by virtue of this change since this work can be performed concurrently with the controlling operation and will cause no delay to contract completion.

Time of completion will be adjusted as follows: No additional working day(s).

CHANGE IN CONTRACT COST:

Contract Bid Award $ 7,941,211.00
Costs from Previous Change Orders (1-8) $ 96,834.20
Increase This Contract Change Order $ 275,244.00
Total New Contract Cost $ 8,313,289.20
Change Order No. TBD
***********************************************************************************

FOR CITY USE ONLY
COST CODES 5800.50-9218-66.4000 (Use Fund 2511 - SB1 Road Maintenance & Rehab) *********************************************************************************** Date: 02/18/22 Vendor No.: 14414 P.O. No.: 2021-00002603

Vendor/Contractor: The Don Chapin Company, Inc. Project No. 9218, ATPL-5045(031)

Project Title: Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements Project No. 9218

CCO No 09 Alisal St Pavement Improvements Elimination of Temp final Bardin Rd SRTS, Project No. 9218, ATPL-5045(031) Page 4 of 4 Submitted by: Date:

Resident Engineer
Approval
Recommended by: Date:

Project Manager
Approval
Recommended by: Date:

Senior Civil Engineer
Approved: Date:

City Engineer
Approved: Date:

Public Works Department Director
Approved: Date:

Finance Department Director
Approved: Date:

City Manager
We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all material, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.

Accepted, Date: Contractor:

By: Title:

&DUROLQH'&KDSLQ ([HFXWLYH9LFH3UHVLGHQW

CITY OF SALINAS

DEVELOPMENT/ENGINEERING

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
Change Order No. 10
Date: 03/07/22 Vendor No.: 14414 P.O. No.: 2021-00002603 Vendor/Contractor: Don Chapin Company Project No. 9218, ATPL-5045(0310) Project Title: Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Improvements Project No. 9218

The changes described and noted herein are hereby authorized. The signed original of this order is on file at the office of the City Engineer.

Change requested by: RESIDENT ENGINEER
Description: Unsuitable soils additional quantities, discovery and mitigation:

During the completion of the mitigation on Stage 1 and 2 unsuitable soil work, it was discovered that additional Roadway Excavation (Item 08 + 718.75 CY) and Class II Disposal (Item 09 + 547.07) was needed complete the work.

On 10/06/21 the subgrade material was uncovered for Stage 4 and it was discovered to be unsuitable. On 10/07/21, DCC submitted RFI 74 requesting direction for mitigation if required. Project team determined that mitigation was required and DCC was directed t o proceed with excavation. Further direction would be provided. On 10/07/21 the response to RFI 74 was sent to DCC directing them to "Excavate an extra 8" and replace with Geotextile fabric B1 or B2 per Caltrans Standard Specifications, and 8" of Class II Aggregate Base. The per-plan structural section was determined to remain the same in this area. On 10/08/21 DCC provided an estimated cost and availability of the required materials for the mitigation. On 10/08/21 DCC was directed to proceed with the mitigation. On 10/29/2021, after demolishing the sidewalk in front of Bardin Elementary School at STA 42+26, DDC encountered additional unsuitable soil. The City and the Designer were notified immediately, Designer replied to treat the unsuitable area with the same mitigation utilized on the adjacent area (remove 8" of soil , place Geotextile fabric, and use B1 or B2 per Caltrans Standard Specifications. Soil would also be replaced with 8" Aggregate Base. On Tuesday 11/02/21 DCC submitted RFI #084. RFI #084 was authorized. Contract Change Order 01 was issued to the Contractor to handle unsuitable material in Phase 1 of the work and to handle potential unsuitable material in phase 2 (additional Item 08, 718.75 CY and Item 09, 547.07 CY). Contractor submitted EWR #9022, #9023, and #9040 totaling $23,868.84 (additional materials is paid by bid item) for the additional mitigation of unsuitable material in driveways (not in original proposal for RFI 74). The total cost for work RFI 74 Unsuitable Material Mitigation includes additional areas under driveways at the Bardin Elementary facilities entrance that were not originally identified. https://salinasca-my.sharepoint.com/personal/eliser_ci_salinas_ca_us/Documents/Bardin/CCO# 10 Unsuitable material 031822 draft AKH ER.doc 2 Method of payment:

INCREASE/DECRAESE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT CONTRACT UNIT RATES:

RFI#74 (Unsuitable Material on Bardin):

Item 08 Roadway Excavation ………………... 395.18CY(5.8%) @ $63/CY = $24,896.34 Item 08 Roadway Excavation (CCO1)…………718.75 CY (10%) @$63/CY= $45,281.25 Item 09 Class II Disposal……………………... 547.07 CY(16.4%) @80/CY= $43,765.60 Item 21 Aggregate Base …..……………...……395.18CY (11.3%) @ $90/CY = $35,566.20 Add Geotextile Fabric (Mirafi HP 170) ………………………… $8,449.95 Total RFI #74= $157,959.34

EXTRA WORK AT AGREED LUMP SUM
Additional labor for driveways
EWR 9022, 9023, 9040 $23,868.84
Proposed labor to install Geofabric
EWFA $2,650.19
Total Additional Labor $26,519.03
 Total Estimated Cost of CCO No 10…………………………………………. $184,478.37 TIME ADJUSTMENT:

No adjustment of contract time is warranted by virtue of this change since this work can be performed concurrently with the controlling operation and will cause no delay to contract completion.

Time of completion will be adjusted as follows: No additional working day(s).

Change in Contract Cost:

Contract Bid Award $ 7,941,211.00
Costs from Previous Change Orders (1-9) $ 372,078.20
Increase This Contract Change Order $ 184,478.37
Total Contract Cost $ 8,497767.57
*************************************************************************************************************************

FOR CITY USE ONLY
COST CODES 5800.50-9277-66.4000
*********************************************************************************************************************** Change Order No. 10
Date: Vendor No.: 14414 P.O. No.: 2021-00002603
Vendor/Contractor: Don Chapin Company Project No. 9218, ATPL-5045(0310) Project Title: Bardin Road Safe Routes To School Improvements Project No. 9218 Submitted by: Aaron Hilton Date
Resident Engineer
Approval Recommended: Date ___________
Project Manager
Approval Recommended: Date
Senior Civil Engineer
Approved: Date
City Engineer
Approved: Date
Public Works Director
Approved: Date
City Manager
We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all material, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.

Accepted, Date Contractor _________________________________________ By: Title ___________________________________

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-171, Version: 1
Amendment to Professional Services with Ground Zero Analysis, Inc.

Approve a Resolution approving an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Salinas and Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. for the performance of site closure activities and contamination mitigation and 2) authorizing an increase of $78,100 to the General Fund appropriation for account 5800.50.9069-63.6010 and use of General Fund balance to cover the anticipated Ground Zero Analysis fees.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 4/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 12, 2022
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, DIRECTOR
BY: BRIAN FRUS, SENIOR ENGINEER
TITLE: AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF SALINAS AND GROUND ZERO
ANALYSIS, INC.

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to 1) approve a Resolution for an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Salinas and Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. for the performance of site closure activities and contamination mitigation and 2) authorizing an increase of $78,100 to the General Fund appropriation for account 5800.50.9069-63.6010 and use of General Fund balance to cover the anticipated Ground Zero Analysis fees.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that City Council 1) approve a resolution for a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Salinas and Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. for the performance of site closure activities and contamination mitigation and 2) authorizing an increase of $78,100 to the General Fund appropriation for account 5800.50.9069-63.6010 and use of General Fund balance to cover the anticipated Ground Zero Analysis fees.

BACKGROUND:

In July 2018 and 2019 the City of Salinas entered into agreements with Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. (Ground Zero) to perform groundwater monitoring and reporting services for two City owned properties as required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The 2019 agreement was amended to include services to petition the SWRCB to close both sites. Tasks involved in the petition included finalizing a Conceptual Site Model and preparation of a Low Threat Closure Policy evaluation and report which were submitted to the SWRCB.

Given that the petition was successful, work to close the sites must now be performed. Efforts will include the abandonment of 13 monitoring wells, removal of any associated waste and submittal of a final summary report to the SWRCB. The monitoring well locations are shown on Fig 1.

Page | 2
Ground Zero Analysis is intimately familiar with the two sites, having facilitated the City’s efforts to close the site thus far. Additionally, Ground Zero Analysis is a very qualified vendor to assist the City navigate the implementation of Case Close Activities and submittal of related documents to the RWQCB. City staff recommends Ground Zero Analysis as no other consulting entity is as familiar with the City’s current needs and challenges associated with these site closures.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The requested Council action directly relates to Council’s Strategic Plans or Goals of providing for “Operational Efficiencies”.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Water, Waste and Energy Division in Public Works will coordinate with the Finance Department as necessary for fiscal concerns including refunds of expenditures from the State.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The total estimated annual cost for the scope of work contained in the Professional Services Agreement is $78,100, the sum of which will be allocated to 5800.50.9069-63.6010 cover the anticipated Ground Zero Analysis fees.

The City’s expenditures for this project are refundable by the Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cleanup Fund (Fund) which provides a means for petroleum UST owners and operators to meet the federal and state requirements of financial responsibility to pay for any damages arising from their tank operations. The Fund provides reimbursement for expenses associated with the cleanup of leaking USTs and money to the Regional Water Boards and local regulatory agencies to cleanup abandoned sites that pose a threat to human health, safety, and the environment, as a result of a UST petroleum release.

ATTACHMENTS:

Council Resolution
Figure 1 – Site Map, monitoring well locations
Amendment to Professional Services Agreement - City of Salinas and Ground Zero Analysis Group, Inc.

Scope of Services
RESOLUTION NO.____________(N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SALINAS AND GROUND ZERO ANALYSIS, INC.

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas entered into agreements in 2018 and 2019 with Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. (Ground Zero) to perform groundwater monitoring and reporting services for two City owned properties as required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); and
WHEREAS, Ground Zero submitted a successful petition to the SWRCB on behalf of the City of Salinas to close the sites requiring related work to be performed; and WHEREAS, no other consulting entity is as familiar with the City’s current needs and challenges associated with these site closures; and WHEREAS, the City’s expenditures for this project are refundable by the Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cleanup Fund which provides a means for petroleum UST owners to pay for the cleanup of leaking USTs; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SALINAS, that pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code sections 12-27 and 12-

28.080 the Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Salinas and Ground Zero for the performance of site closure activities and contamination mitigation, in the amount of $78,100, is hereby approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes that $78,100 be allocated to 5800.50.9069-63.6010 to cover the cost of the agreement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of Salinas is hereby authorized and directed, for and on behalf of the City of Salinas, and as its act and deed, to execute the attached Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Salinas, a Charter City, and Ground Zero Analysis Inc., a California Corporation.

PASSED AND APPROVED this April 12, 2022 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN
APPROVED:

Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

1172 Kansas Avenue, Suite A
Modesto, CA 95351
209.522.4119 – PH
209.522.4227 - FAX
groundzeroanalysis.com
Cost Estimate for Site Closure Activities
August 25, 2021
Mr. Brian Frus
Senior Civil Engineer,
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, CA 93901
Subject: Cost Estimate for Case Closure Activities
Lamar Building and Melody Lane LUFT Sites, Salinas, CA
Dear Mr. Frus:

We are writing to provide you with a proposal and cost estimate to complete the activities needed to achieve regulatory case closure for the two leaking underground storage tank sites in downtown Salinas. As you know the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in their letter dated June 7, 2021, indicated that they have no further requirements for investigation and cleanup and will close the cases once the monitoring wells have been properly destroyed and all investigationderived wastes have been removed and properly disposed of.

Our proposed workscope consists of the following tasks:

1. Task 1 – Permitting and Project Coordination: This will involve obtaining Monterey County well destruction permits for the thirteen monitoring wells along with City of Salinas encroachment permits for the wells located in City right of way. The well locations will be marked for Underground Service Alert utility locating. We will coordinate the destruction work with contactors, agencies and affected private parties.

2. Task 2 – Well Destruction: The thirteen monitoring wells will be destroyed by a combination of overdrill and pressure grouting methods as dictated by Monterey County.

Three locations will require traffic control.

3. Task 3 – Waste Removal: All investigation-derived waste including drill cuttings, purge water and gasoline product will be profiled and transported to properly licensed facilities for disposal or recycling.

4. Task 4 – Reporting: The results of the activities will be reported to the RWQCB Our estimated budget to complete these activities is approximately $78,000. Exhibit A, attached, provides detail on the anticipated costs.

EXHIBIT A

ESTIMATED BUDGET

WELL DESTRUCTION
Salinas - Lamar Melody
Salinas, CA
TASK 1

1.1 Monterey County Health Dept - Well Destruction Permits $ 7,306

1.2 City of Salinas Development Engineering (PW) Encroachment Permits $ 8,000

1.3 Ground Zero Personnel
Registered Geologist $ 180.00 per hour 4 hours $ 720
Senior Geologist $ 150.00 per hour 15 hours $ 2,250
Senior Geologist $ 150.00 per hour 8 hours $ 1,200
Project Coordinator $ 100.00 per hour 15 hours $ 1,500
Subtotal $ 5,670

1.4 Materials and Equipment
Measuring Wheel $ 10.00 per day 1 day $ 10
Misc USA Marking Supplies $ 20.00 per each 1 each $ 20
Mileage $ 0.56 per mile 220 miles $ 123
Subtotal $ 153
TASK 1 TOTAL $ 21,129
TASK 2 WELL DESTRUCTION

2.1 Contractors
Drilling Subcontractor - Cascade Drilling (5 Days) $ 25,677 Subtotal $ 25,677

2.2 Ground Zero Personnel
Registered Geologist $ 180.00 per hour 8 hours $ 1,440
Senior Geologist $ 150.00 per hour 55 hours $ 8,250
Subtotal $ 9,690

2.3 Traffic Control Plan & Traffic Control (3 Areas)
Area 1 - MW13 & MW24 $ 3,246.00 per area 1 area $ 3,246 Area 2 - MW12 $ 688.00 per area 1 area $ 688
Area 3 - MW20 $ 688.00 per area 1 area $ 688
Subtotal $ 4,622

2.4 Materials and Equipment
Water Level Probe $ 33.00 per day 5 days $ 165
Per Diem (mileage, hotel, meals) $ 192.00 per day 5 days $ 960 Porta-potty $ 730.00 per rental 1 rental $ 730
Miscellaneous $ 33.00 per day 5 days $ 165
Subtotal $ 2,020
TASK 2 TOTAL $ 42,009

PROJECT PLANNING, COORDINATION, PERMITTING, SITE CLOSURE ACTIVITIES AND

REGULATORY LIAISON

EXHIBIT A

ESTIMATED BUDGET

WELL DESTRUCTION
Salinas - Lamar Melody
Salinas, CA
TASK 3 WASTE DISPOSAL

3.1 Ground Zero Personnel
Senior Technician $ 100.00 per hour 10 hours $ 1,000
Mileage $ 0.56 per mile 220 miles $ 123
Subtotal $ 1,123

3.2 Laboratory Analysis
LUFT 5 $ 50.00 per sample 2 samples $ 100
8260 (incl TPHg) $ 105.00 per sample 2 samples $ 210
Diesel $ 47.00 per sample 2 samples $ 94
Subtotal $ 404

3.3 Free Product, Soil & Water Disposal
Instrat, Inc. - Water and Soil $ 2,200.00 total 1 event $ 2,200 Instrat, Inc. - Free Product $ 2,200.00 total 1 event $ 2,200 Subtotal $ 4,400
TASK 3 TOTAL $ 5,927
TASK 4 WELL DESTRUCTION REPORT PREPARATION (Geotracker Upload)

4.1 Ground Zero Personnel
Registered Geologist $ 180.00 per hour 2 hours $ 360
Senior Geologist $ 150.00 per hour 8 hours $ 1,200
Draftsperson $ 95.00 per hour 2 hours $ 190
Project Coordinator $ 100.00 per hour 2 hours $ 200
TASK 4 TOTAL $ 1,950
10% CONTINGENCY $7,102
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 78,117
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-173, Version: 1
California Interagency Council on Homelessness Encampment Resolution Fund Program Grant Award Acceptance
Approve a Resolution authorizing the acceptance of a $4,079,416.72 grant award from the California Interagency Council on Homelessness Encampment Resolution Fund Program and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all required Agreements and related documents necessary to implement the program.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 4/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 12, 2022
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FROM: MEGAN HUNTER, DIRECTOR
BY: ROD POWELL, PLANNING MANAGER
TITLE: CALIFORNIA INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HOMELESSNESS

ENCAMPMENT RESOLUTION FUND PROGRAM GRANT

AWARD ACCEPTANCE
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

Motion to approve a Resolution authorizing:
1) authorizing the City Manager or designee to accept a grant award in the amount of $4,079,416.72 and execute all required Agreements and related documents necessary to implement the program;
2) the use of City HUD ESG-CV, HCD ESG-CV, HUD ESG, CESH, ARPA/Project Roomkey, HOME ARP, and PLHA combined fund in the amount of $2,543,904; and, 3) the establishment of Cal ICH ERF appropriations of $4,079,416.72 and corresponding revenue budget to implement a multi-agency demonstration project focused on creating effective pathways to permanent housing for residents of targeted encampments and to allow for the restoration of the encampment area to its original condition and/or intended use.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to 1) accept a grant award in the amount $4,079,416.72 million dollarsfrom the California Interagency Council on Homelessness Encampment Resolution Fund Program; 2) use of HUD ESG-CV, HCD ESG-CV, HUD ESG, CESH, ARPA/Project Roomkey, HOME ARP, and PLHA in the amount of $2,543,904; and 3) the establishment of Cal ICH ERF appropriations of $4,079,416.72 and corresponding revenue budget to implement a multi-agency demonstration project focused on creating effective pathways to permanent housing for residents of targeted encampments and to allow for the restoration of the encampment area to its original condition and/or intended use.

BACKGROUND:

Homelessness is a serious ongoing problem in the City and throughout Monterey County. The most recent 2019 Homeless Point in Time Count, identified 1,182 persons as unhoused in the City Page | 2
of Salinas. In late 2020, to assist unhoused individuals access available services and housing options and mitigate the negative impacts of Covid-19 on this vulnerable population, the CDD established the City of Salinas Outreach and Response Team (SORT). CDD and SORT continue to seek and obtain innovative and collaborative opportunities and funding to effectively address homelessness within the City’s jurisdiction, including ongoing partnerships with other local homeless services providers and agencies.

In 2017, the State created the Homeless Coordinating and Financing Council (HCFC) to oversee the coordinated implementation of Housing First policies, best practice guidelines, and regulations to reduce the prevalence and duration of homelessness in California. In early 2022, the State reorganized HCFC to become what is now known as the California Interagency Council on Homelessness under the expressed mission to develop policies, identify resources, benefits, and services to prevent and work toward ending homelessness in California. In addition to interagency coordination and policy development, Cal ICH is mandated to coordinate funding while also promoting systems integration to increase efficiency and effectiveness of the homeless response system and the state and local level.

DISCUSSION:

Under the authority of Chapter 7 of Part 1 of Division 31 of the California Health and Safety Code, the Encampment Resolution Fund (ERF) Program was established to increase collaboration between Cal ICH, local jurisdictions, and Continuums of Care to assist local jurisdictions in ensuring the wellness and safety of people experiencing homelessness in encampments; provide encampment resolution grants to local jurisdictions and continuums of care to support innovative and replicable efforts to resolve critical encampment concerns and to support individuals access to safe and stable housing using Housing First approaches; and encourage data-informed, coordinated approaches to address unsheltered homelessness at encampments by establishing effective, scalable, and replicable demonstration projects.

ERF grants awarded through the RFA will support Cal ICH mandates by funding local demonstration projects that incorporate Housing First approaches to provide services to address the immediate crisis of experiencing unsheltered homelessness in encampments, to support people living in encampments onto paths to safe and stable housing and result in sustainable restoration of public spaces to their intended uses while safeguarding the needs of unhoused people seeking shelter.

On October 29, 2021, Cal ICH released the Encampment Resolution Fund (ERF) Program Request for Applications (RFA) for Encampment Resolution Funding seeking proposals from Continuums of Care (CoC) and local jurisdictions to fund demonstration projects that provide services to address the immediate crisis of experiencing unsheltered homelessness in encampments, to support people living in encampments onto paths to safe and stable housing and result in sustainable restoration of public spaces to their intended uses while safeguarding the needs of unhoused people seeking shelter. Total funding available for award through the competitive RFA was $47.5 million.

To formulate a competitive proposal, CDD - Housing & Community Development Division staff successfully engaged and collaborated with several agencies and community partners on a Page | 3
comprehensive service strategy, inclusive of $2.9 million in leveraged funds, that would focus on encampments in and adjacent to the Natividad, Alisal and Gabilan Creeks. Service partners include the Coalition of Homeless Services Providers (CHSP), Catholic Charities of the Diocese of the Monterey Peninsula (CCDMP), the Central Coast Center for Independent Living (CCCIL), the University Corporation of Monterey Bay’s Community Health Engagement Team (CHE) and Return to the Natives, Monterey County Water Resources Agency, and the City’s Public Works Department. Housing Division staff formulated and submitted a comprehensive, competitive proposal on December 30, 2021, and, in accordance with the planned RFA timeline, the City received formal notice from Cal ICH on February 25, 2022, advising the full award of funding requested in its application.

DEPARMENT COORDINATION:

The Cal ICH ERF Program will be administered by the City’s CDD – Housing & Community Development Division. Sub-recipient agreements will be executed with each of the collaboration partner agencies. CDD will coordinate with the City’s Finance and Legal Departments to ensure regulatory compliance and the efficient, full disbursement of funds.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action – “authorizing the City Manager to accept a grant in the amount of nearly $4.1 million dollars for The California Interagency Council on Homelessness (Cal ICH) Encampment Resolution Fund (ERF) Grant Program” is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378). A portion of the grant will be used to remove debris and restore natural areas along Natividad, Gabilan, and Alisal Creeks, which may be subject to CEQA, but would be statutorily exempt under Section 15304 - Minor Alterations to Land.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The Cal ICH ERF Program is intended to assist unhoused City residents within the identified encampments move towards immediate and permanent housing options and allow for much needed restoration of vulnerable environments and public spaces. Acceptance of the awarded funding and implementation of the proposed program addresses each of the Goals and Strategies identified in the Council’s 2022-23 Strategic Plan including: Economic Development; Housing/Affordable Housing; Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability; Public Safety; Youth and Seniors; and Effective and Culturally Responsive Government.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Funding received through Cal ICH ERF Program will be leveraged with additional funds from each of the grant’s collaborative partners to support two full years of grant administration and planned outreach, housing, and wraparound services as well as the physical restoration of impacted environmental areas and public spaces.

Page | 4
The CDD – Housing & Community Development Division will leverage the following fund sources in the amount of $2,543,904 as follows:
 HUD ESG-Covid $413,360.00
 HCD ESG-Covid $118,500.00
 HUD ESG $50,000.00
 CESH $479,179.00
 ARPA/PRK Motel Program $633,375.00
 Homekey HOME ARP/PLHA $799,200.00
The City’s Public Works Department will leverage $40,000 in Measure G funds from CIP 50- 9068. External grant partners will leverage an additional $334,409 in funding.

Grant funds received shall be appropriated to the City and its program partners as follows:
 City of Salinas CDD SORT $1,791,381.00
 Coalition of Homeless Services Providers $114,399.26
 Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Monterey $238,102.46  City of Salinas Public Works $1,385,670.00
 Monterey County Water Resources Agency $491,335.00
 Return to the Natives – CSUMB $58,529.00
ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Cal ICH Notice of Intent to Fund
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1) AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO ACCEPT A GRANT AWARD IN THE AMOUNT $4,079,416.72

MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE CALIFORNIA INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON

HOMELESSNESS ENCAMPMENT RESOLUTION FUND PROGRAM AND EXECUTE

ALL REQUIRED AGREEMENTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM; 2) ESTABLISHING APPROPRIATIONS TOTALING $4,079,416.72 AND A CORRESPONDING REVENUE BUDGET TO IMPLEMENT A

MULTI-AGENCY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FOCUSED ON CREATING

EFFECTIVE PATHWAYS TO PERMANENT HOUSING FOR RESIDENTS OF

TARGETED ENCAMPMENTS AND ALLOW FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE ENCAMPMENT AREA TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AND/OR INTENDED USE; AND 3) APPROVING LEVERAGING OF VARIOUS FUNDS TOTALING $2,543,904 WHEREAS, The California Interagency Council on Homelessness released the request for applications for the Encampment Resolution Fund (ERF) Program on October 29, 2021, with a total estimated available funding of $47,000,000; and WHEREAS, The ERF Program seeks to fund local demonstration projects that provide services to address the immediate crisis of experiencing unsheltered homelessness in encampments, to support people living in encampments onto paths to safe and stable housing and result in sustainable restoration of public spaces to their intended uses while safeguarding the needs of unhoused people seeking shelter; and
WHEREAS, The City of Salinas Community Development Department submitted a proposal on December 31, 2021, requesting $4,079,416.72, to address homeless encampments and the environmental impacts along a milelong stretch of land along multiple waterways including Natividad, Alisal and Gabilan Creeks; and
WHEREAS, On February 25, 2022, the California Interagency Council on Homelessness ERF Program provided the City with a “Notice of Intent to Award” funds in the amount of $4,079,416.72 to the City of Salinas.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Resolution 1) authorizing the City Manager or designee to accept a grant award in the amount $4,079,416.72 million dollars from the California Interagency Council on Homelessness Encampment Resolution Fund Program and execute all required Agreements and related documents necessary to implement the program; 2) establishing Cal ICH ERF appropriations totaling $4,079,416.72 and a corresponding revenue budget to implement a multi-agency demonstration project focused on creating effective pathways to permanent housing for residents of targeted encampments and allow for the restoration of the encampment area to its original condition and/or intended use; and 3) approving leveraging of HUD ESG-CV, HCD ESG-CV, HUD ESG, CESH, ARPA/Project Roomkey, HOME ARP, and PLHA funds totaling $2,543,904.
2 PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
______________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

CALIFORNIA INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HOMELESSNESS

ENCAMPMENT RESOLUTION FUNDING GRANT PROGRAM
801 Capitol Mall, 6th floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
https://bcsh.ca.gov/calich
February 24, 2022

NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD

ENCAMPMENT RESOLUTION FUNDING (ERF) GRANT PROGRAM
In consideration of the response to the Request for Applications1 , the California Interagency
Council on Homelessness (Cal ICH) intends to award Encampment Resolution Funds to the following jurisdictions:

Proposed Awardees Proposed Funding Amounts
City - Richmond $4,881,272.00
City - Fresno $5,070,057.68
County - Marin $317,236.00
City - Berkeley $4,708,015.00
City - Long Beach $1,322,281.41
City - Los Angeles - Council
District 4
$1,747,385.00
City - Salinas $4,079,416.72
City - Vista $1,828,394.00
City - Redwood City $1,843,500.00
County - Santa Cruz $2,370,460.00
County - Santa Barbara $2,520,000.00
City - Petaluma $1,321,215.00
County - Orange $3,627,030.00
County - San Bernardino $1,787,998.00
City - Tulare $1,566,604.18
City - San Rafael $522,619.00
City - San Jose $2,085,216.00
City - Eureka $1,670,000.00
City - Oakland $4,731,300.01
Under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 50251(c), “[Cal ICH’s] decision to approve or deny an application and the determination of the amount of funding to be provided shall be final and not subject to appeal.”
1 The Request For Applications last accessed at
https://bcsh.ca.gov/calich/documents/encampment_rfa.pdf on 2/18/22 STATE OF CALIFORNIA – BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor
This Notice of Intent to Award is subject to execution of a written contract and, as a result, this Notice does not constitute the formation of a contract between the State and the proposed awardees. Proposed awardees shall not acquire any legal or equitable rights relative to the contract services until a contract containing terms and conditions acceptable to the State is executed. The State further reserves the right to cancel and / or modify this Notice of Intent to Award at any time prior to the execution of a written contract.

For information about this Notice, please contact Jeannie McKendry, Grants Development Section Chief for Cal ICH at [email protected].

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-174, Version: 1
Direct Purchase of Emergency Equipment for Police Vehicles Approve a Resolution authorizing the direct purchase of emergency equipment to upfit 14 police vehicles for a total cost not to exceed $349,356.61.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 4/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 12, 2022
DEPARTMENT: SALINAS POLICE DEPARTMENT
FROM: ROBERTO FILICE, CHIEF OF POLICE
BY: TONYA ERICKSON, MANAGEMENT ANALYST
TITLE: DIRECT PURCHASE OF EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT FOR

POLICE VEHICLES
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing the direct purchase of emergency equipment to upfit 14 police vehicles for a total cost not to exceed $349,356.61.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that City Council approve the direct purchase of emergency equipment from Lehr and Motorola to upfit 14 police vehicles for a total cost not to exceed $349,356.61.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On December 7, 2021, City Council approved the direct purchase of fourteen (14) Ford Police Interceptor Utility vehicles which will be assigned to patrol functions. Staff are now recommending the direct purchase of emergency equipment to upfit these 14 new police vehicles for a total cost not to exceed $349,356.61.

BACKGROUND:

During FY 2020-21, the Salinas Police Department, in collaboration with the Public Works Fleet Division, developed a comprehensive Police Vehicle Replacement Plan which established target replacement cycles based upon vehicle assignment, usage data and best practices in fleet management. The plan projected necessary replacement through the next two decades, and identified the annual funding needed based upon current costs. The Police Vehicle Replacement Plan will guide replacement decisions and is intended to be updated based upon current data and vehicle needs. For vehicles assigned to patrol functions, the target replacement cycle is 6 years and/or 120,000 miles and the plan identified the need to add additional patrol vehicles to ensure vehicle usage would support replacement at this frequency.

Page | 2
On December 7, 2021, City Council approved the direct purchase of fourteen (14) Ford Police Interceptor Utility vehicles which will be assigned to patrol functions. Ten (10) of these vehicles will be assigned to general patrol functions, two of these vehicles will be assigned to patrol supervisors, and four of the vehicles will be assigned as K9 vehicles. Emergency equipment was not previously requested as we did not want to delay the ordering of vehicles while we continued to evaluate our best options for the purchase and install of necessary emergency equipment.

The Public Works Fleet Division began consistently servicing police vehicles in mid-2020 and since then has expanded the work to include the maintenance and repair of the associated emergency equipment. During the current FY, Fleet Division mechanics have performed additional work and attended trainings related to emergency vehicle equipment, and three of the mechanics are now certified Emergency Vehicle Technicians. In 2021, Fleet Division mechanics successfully completed the upfitting of one complete patrol vehicle and have since taken on the installation of emergency equipment on some administrative and specialty vehicles. Given the increased training and experience, as well as plans to expand the number of mechanics available to work on emergency equipment, Public Works Fleet Division now feels ready to assume the emergency equipment upfitting of patrol vehicles. Having the emergency equipment installation completed by Public Works Fleet Division staff will save the City $100,985.20 on these vehicles.

The department is requesting approval for the direct purchase of the necessary emergency equipment identified below. We are also requesting approval of a 10% contingency as market conditions have led to unexpected price increases and instances of vendors not being able to honor previously quoted prices.

Vendor Vehicle Function Price per Unit # Units Total Cost Lehr General Patrol 12,464.12 8 99,712.96
Lehr Patrol Sergeant 11,384.44 2 22,768.88
Lehr K9 Vehicle 15,621.75 4 62,487.00
Motorola Radio – All 9,473.43 14 132,628.08
10% Contingency 31,759.69
Not to Exceed Total 349,356.61
There are no local vendors for the purchase of the emergency vehicle equipment indicated above.

We have found Lehr to consistently provide the most competitive prices for specialized emergency equipment and we order the vehicle radios directly from the manufacturer, Motorola.

The City Council has the authority to approve this direct purchase under Salinas Municipal code Section12-27 and without application of the local purchasing preference pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 12-28.080.

Police Community Advisory Committee
The Police Chief is presenting this direct purchase request to the Police Community Advisory Committee on March 30, 2022. The Committee will have an opportunity to ask questions and provide comments related to this requested action.

Page | 3
CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Approving the proposed resolution will support the City Council’s Strategic Plan Goal of Public Safety and Effective and Culturally Responsive Government.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Police Department has coordinated with the Public Works Fleet Division on the selection and specification of emergency equipment for police vehicles and will coordinate with the Finance Department during the purchasing process.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

No additional funds are requested to support this purchase. Funds are appropriated and available within the Police Vehicle Replacement account, 5800.40.9579.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Emergency Equipment Quotes
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DIRECT PURCHASE OF

EMERGENCY EQUPMENT FOR POLICE VEHICLES
WHEREAS, the during FY 2020-21, the Police Department developed a comprehensive Fleet Replacement Plan and corresponding Police Vehicle Replacement funds were approved by City Council as part of the FY 2021-22 Police Department Budget; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021 the City Council approved the direct purchase of 14 Ford Interceptor Utility SUVs to support ongoing Patrol operations; and WHEREAS, the department must purchase emergency equipment for the 14 new police vehicles; and
WHEREAS, there are no local vendors available for this specialized emergency equipment and Lehr has provided quotes totaling $184,968.84 for emergency equipment and Motorola has provided a quote totaling $132,628.08 for vehicle radios; and WHEREAS, the department is requesting an additional 10% contingency, totaling $31,759.69, given current market conditions which have led to unexpected price increases and instances of vendors not honoring quoted prices; and
WHEREAS, the City Council can approve this purchase pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 12-27 (exception to low-bid based competition) in contracting for equipment, materials, supplies and services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Salinas City Council authorizes the direct purchase of emergency equipment, including radios, from Lehr and Motorola for a total cost not to exceed $349,356.61.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
______________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
2 ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Item No. Description
Manufacturer
Name Quantity Unit Price Total Price
*PARTS ONLY* 2022 FORD PIU PATROL UNITS
_____________________________________
Front End Equipment
_____________________________________
BK0534ITU20 PB400 PUSH BUMPER 2020 UTIL Setina 1 374.25 374.25

NO LIGHTS
FK0402ITU20 PB9 Fender Wraps
ALUM.

PB300/400
Setina 1 426.75 426.75

OEM - FRONT CORNERS

OEM - WIG WAG
MCRNTR MICRON RED STUD MOUNT Whelen 1 79.80 79.80
MCRNTB MICRON BLUE STUD MOUNT Whelen 1 79.80 79.80
EX0011 PATROL POWER HARNESS FRT MNT PI UTIL 2020 Patrol Power 1 680.25 680.25 SA315P SIREN SPEAKER 100W Whelen 1 179.99 179.99
SAK66D SPEAKER BRACKET-D/S UTILITY 2020 Whelen 1 25.80 25.80 _____________________________________
Side Equipment
_____________________________________
PNT1CRV05 SURFACE ADPTORS Sound Off 1 8.71 8.71
ENT2B3J INTERSECTER LED R/B Sound Off 1 187.80 187.80
ENT2B3J INTERSECTER LED R/B Sound Off 1 187.80 187.80
_____________________________________
Roof Equipment
_____________________________________
EB2DEDE-LEHR WHELEN 54" LEGACY BAR WCX Whelen 1 1,999.00 1,999.00 STPKT105 STRAP KIT UTILITY 2020- Whelen 1
Page:

Document Date:

Quote Number:

Sales Quote
To:

Ship
SalesPerson
Ship Via Customer ID
To:

Sell
33859
Mike McGee
60632
Phone:

Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Ship from Lehr's Warehouse
Phone: (831) 758-7325
Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Phone: 925-370-2144 Fax: 925-370-2087
661 Garcia Avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565
3/24/2022
1 Tax Ident. Type Legal Entity
Vehicle Information:

Terms: Net 30
Payment Method:

PRICES ARE VALID FOR 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF QUOTE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Item No. Description
Manufacturer
Name Quantity Unit Price Total Price

CSM - WHELEN VSG MODEM ANTENNA

CSM - CRADLEPOINT MODEM ANTENNA

CSM - RADIO ANTENNA
LGMM-EXT-R LGMM THICK PANEL ANTENNA ADAPTER KIT-UTILITY Panorama 1 44.16 44.16 _____________________________________
Drivers Compartment
_____________________________________
425-6505 FORD PIU 2020 CONTOUR CONSOLE JottoDesk 1 443.52 443.52 425-6295 FACE PLATE 3" XTL, APX 05 HEAD JottoDesk 1
425-6101 FACE PLATE 4" CENCOM JottoDesk 1
425-6099 FACE PLATE 3" JottoDesk 1
425-6164 FACE PLATE USB-PP JottoDesk 1 97.70 97.70
425-3704 CUP HOLDER 4" JottoDesk 1 53.48 53.48
MMSU-1 MAGNETIC MIC KIT Magnetic Mic 1 24.64 24.64
TM-5502UDB-UNIB-E HINT MOUNTING SYSTEM W/UNIVERSAL DISPLAY BRACKET Westin 1 720.00 720.00

CSM - MOTOROLA RADIO

CSM - AXON ICV
CSM - CF33 TABLET
CSM - CF33 DOCK

CSM - IKEY KEYBOARD
GK10141S1U D T-RAIL VAULT 1-SMALL LOCK 1-UNIV XL LOCK Setina 1 479.25 479.25 _____________________________________
Prisoner Compartment
_____________________________________
PK0369ITU20TM #8VS RP 1/2 COATED POLY 1/2 EXP METAL PARTITON Setina 1 614.25 614.25 QK0634ITU20 FULL REPL TRANSPORT SEAT CENTER PULL BELTS 2020 Setina 1 674.25 674.25 PK0316ITU202ND #12VS COATED POLY REAR PARTITION 2020 UTILITY Setina 1 411.75 411.75 Page:

Document Date:

Quote Number:

Sales Quote
To:

Ship
SalesPerson
Ship Via Customer ID
To:

Sell
33859
Mike McGee
60632
Phone:

Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Ship from Lehr's Warehouse
Phone: (831) 758-7325
Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Phone: 925-370-2144 Fax: 925-370-2087
661 Garcia Avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565
3/24/2022
2 Tax Ident. Type Legal Entity
Vehicle Information:

Terms: Net 30
Payment Method:

PRICES ARE VALID FOR 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF QUOTE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Item No. Description
Manufacturer
Name Quantity Unit Price Total Price
WK0595ITU20 POLY WINDOW BAR Setina 1 224.25 224.25
DK0100ITU20 TPO DOOR PANELS BLK, UTIL 2020 Setina 1 209.25 209.25 V-DRAIN II V-DRAIN LONG SERIES II 1 16.00 16.00
_____________________________________
Back End Equipment
_____________________________________
TK0241ITU20 CARGO BOX DSC-DRAWER/SLD/COMBO BSN-BASE/SLD/NO LK
Setina 1 1,064.25 1,064.25
TPA9289 CARGO BOX RADIO TRAY Setina 1 292.49 292.49
TLI2J ION T-SERIES LINEAR SUPER-LED DUO RED/BLUE Whelen 2 84.99 169.98

CSM - MODEM

CSM - FLARES
VTX609R VERTEX SUPER-LED LIGHT RED Whelen 1 67.80 67.80 VTX609B VERTEX SUPER-LED LIGHT BLUE Whelen 1 67.80 67.80

REAR TAIL LAMPS L/R
DC-5E8Q-25BLMB 25' CAT 5 CABLE Misc Parts 2 12.50 25.00 C399 CENCOM CORE WCX CONTROL CENTER Whelen 1 919.00 919.00 CCTL6 WECAN-X ROTARY KNOB/SLIDE CONTROL HEAD Whelen 1
C399K4 OBDII CANPORT CABLE KIT FORD W/O OEM OPTION 61B Whelen 1 CV2V VEHICLE-TO-VEHICLE SYNC MODULE Whelen 1 185.40 185.40 CANEM16 16 OUTPUT EXPANSION MODULE Whelen 1 145.80 145.80

CSM - WHELEN VSG MODEM // WHELEN CLOUD

CSM - CRADLEPOINT MODEM // ICV
_____________________________________
F FREIGHT CHARGES WILL BE BILLED AT ACTUAL COST Service Items 1 250.00 250.00 12,464.12
1034.15
11,429.97
Total:

Total Sales Tax:

Subtotal:
250.00
11179.97
Amount Exempt from Sales Tax
Amount Subject to Sales Tax
Name: __________________________________________________ Auth. Signature: ________________________________________ Agency Approval
PLEASE READ: No returns without approval and an RMA# will be accepted. All shortages, damage, or return claims must be made within 10 days of invoice date. NO EXCEPTIONS. A copy of the invoice and RMA paperwork must be shipped with returns. All return orders or cancellations are subject to a 25% restocking fee plus freight. Any change orders made 60 days prior to the installation date may be subject to a production delay and pricing changes. PRICES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.

Page:

Document Date:

Quote Number:

Sales Quote
To:

Ship
SalesPerson
Ship Via Customer ID
To:

Sell
33859
Mike McGee
60632
Phone:

Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Ship from Lehr's Warehouse
Phone: (831) 758-7325
Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Phone: 925-370-2144 Fax: 925-370-2087
661 Garcia Avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565
3/24/2022
3 Tax Ident. Type Legal Entity
Vehicle Information:

Terms: Net 30
Payment Method:

PRICES ARE VALID FOR 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF QUOTE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Item No. Description
Manufacturer
Name Quantity Unit Price Total Price
2022 FORD PIU SGT UNIT
_____________________________________
Front End Equipment
_____________________________________
BK0534ITU20 PB400 PUSH BUMPER 2020 UTIL Setina 1 424.15 424.15

NO LIGHTS
FK0402ITU20 PB9 Fender Wraps
ALUM.

PB300/400
Setina 1 483.65 483.65

OEM - FRONT CORNERS

OEM - WIG WAG
MCRNTR MICRON RED STUD MOUNT Whelen 1 89.99 89.99
MCRNTB MICRON BLUE STUD MOUNT Whelen 1 89.99 89.99
GRILL
EX0011 PATROL POWER HARNESS FRT MNT PI UTIL 2020 Patrol Power 1 725.60 725.60 SA315P SIREN SPEAKER 100W Whelen 1 179.99 179.99
SAK66D SPEAKER BRACKET-D/S UTILITY 2020 Whelen 1 31.50 31.50 _____________________________________
Side Equipment
_____________________________________
PNT1CRV05 SURFACE ADPTORS Sound Off 1 9.38 9.38
ENT2B3J INTERSECTER LED R/B Sound Off 1 220.43 220.43
ENT2B3J INTERSECTER LED R/B Sound Off 1 220.43 220.43
_____________________________________
Roof Equipment
_____________________________________
EB2DEDE-LEHR WHELEN 54" LEGACY BAR WCX Whelen 1 1,999.00 1,999.00 Page:

Document Date:

Quote Number:

Sales Quote
To:

Ship
SalesPerson
Ship Via Customer ID
To:

Sell
35218
Mike McGee
60632
Phone:

Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Ship from Lehr's Warehouse
Phone: (831) 758-7325
Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Phone: 925-370-2144 Fax: 925-370-2087
661 Garcia Avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565
3/25/2022
1 Tax Ident. Type Legal Entity
Vehicle Information:

Terms: Net 30
Payment Method:

PRICES ARE VALID FOR 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF QUOTE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Item No. Description
Manufacturer
Name Quantity Unit Price Total Price
STPKT105 STRAP KIT UTILITY 2020- Whelen 1 66.50 66.50

CSM - WHELEN VSG MODEM ANTENNA

CSM - CRADLEPOINT MODEM ANTENNA

CSM - RADIO ANTENNA
LGMM-EXT-R LGMM THICK PANEL ANTENNA ADAPTER KIT-UTILITY Panorama 1 44.16 44.16 _____________________________________
Drivers Compartment
_____________________________________
425-6505 FORD PIU 2020 CONTOUR CONSOLE JottoDesk 1 498.96 498.96 425-6295 FACE PLATE 3" XTL, APX 05 HEAD JottoDesk 1 42.80 42.80 425-6101 FACE PLATE 4" CENCOM JottoDesk 1 42.80 42.80
425-6099 FACE PLATE 3" JottoDesk 1 42.80 42.80
425-6164 FACE PLATE USB-PP JottoDesk 1 109.92 109.92
425-3704 CUP HOLDER 4" JottoDesk 1 60.16 60.16
MMSU-1 MAGNETIC MIC KIT Magnetic Mic 1 34.95 34.95
TM-5502UDB-UNIB-E 500-0001 HINT MOUNTING SYSTEM W/UNIVERSAL DISPLAY

BRACKET
Westin 1 720.00 720.00

CSM - MOTOROLA RADIO

CSM - AXON ICV
CSM - CF33 TABLET
CSM - CF33 DOCK

CSM - IKEY KEYBOARD
GK10141S1U D T-RAIL VAULT 1-SMALL LOCK 1-UNIV XL LOCK Setina 1 543.15 543.15 _____________________________________
Back End Equipment
_____________________________________
TK0241ITU20 CARGO BOX DSC-DRAWER/SLD/COMBO BSN-BASE/SLD/NO LK
Setina 1 1,206.15 1,206.15
Page:

Document Date:

Quote Number:

Sales Quote
To:

Ship
SalesPerson
Ship Via Customer ID
To:

Sell
35218
Mike McGee
60632
Phone:

Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Ship from Lehr's Warehouse
Phone: (831) 758-7325
Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Phone: 925-370-2144 Fax: 925-370-2087
661 Garcia Avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565
3/25/2022
2 Tax Ident. Type Legal Entity
Vehicle Information:

Terms: Net 30
Payment Method:

PRICES ARE VALID FOR 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF QUOTE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Item No. Description
Manufacturer
Name Quantity Unit Price Total Price
TPA9289 CARGO BOX RADIO TRAY Setina 1 331.49 331.49
TLI2J ION T-SERIES LINEAR SUPER-LED DUO RED/BLUE Whelen 2 84.99 169.98

CSM - MODEM

CSM - FLARES
VTX609R VERTEX SUPER-LED LIGHT RED Whelen 1 76.99 76.99 VTX609B VERTEX SUPER-LED LIGHT BLUE Whelen 1 76.99 76.99

REAR TAIL LAMPS L/R
DC-5E8Q-25BLMB 25' CAT 5 CABLE Misc Parts 2
C399 CENCOM CORE WCX CONTROL CENTER Whelen 1 919.00 919.00 CCTL6 WECAN-X ROTARY KNOB/SLIDE CONTROL HEAD Whelen 1 288.40 288.40 C399K4 OBDII CANPORT CABLE KIT FORD W/O OEM OPTION 61B Whelen 1 38.50 38.50 CV2V VEHICLE-TO-VEHICLE SYNC MODULE Whelen 1 226.10 226.10 CANEM16 16 OUTPUT EXPANSION MODULE Whelen 1 177.80 177.80

CSM - WHELEN VSG MODEM // WHELEN CLOUD

CSM - CRADLEPOINT MODEM // ICV
_____________________________________
F Shipping Charges Service Items 1 250.00 250.00
11,384.44
942.73
10,441.71
Total:

Total Sales Tax:

Subtotal:
250.00
10191.71
Amount Exempt from Sales Tax
Amount Subject to Sales Tax
Name: __________________________________________________ Auth. Signature: ________________________________________ Agency Approval
PLEASE READ: No returns without approval and an RMA# will be accepted. All shortages, damage, or return claims must be made within 10 days of invoice date. NO EXCEPTIONS. A copy of the invoice and RMA paperwork must be shipped with returns. All return orders or cancellations are subject to a 25% restocking fee plus freight. Any change orders made 60 days prior to the installation date may be subject to a production delay and pricing changes. PRICES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.

Page:

Document Date:

Quote Number:

Sales Quote
To:

Ship
SalesPerson
Ship Via Customer ID
To:

Sell
35218
Mike McGee
60632
Phone:

Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Ship from Lehr's Warehouse
Phone: (831) 758-7325
Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Phone: 925-370-2144 Fax: 925-370-2087
661 Garcia Avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565
3/25/2022
3 Tax Ident. Type Legal Entity
Vehicle Information:

Terms: Net 30
Payment Method:

PRICES ARE VALID FOR 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF QUOTE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Item No. Description
Manufacturer
Name Quantity Unit Price Total Price
2022 FORD K9 PATROL PARTS ONLY
_____________________________________
Front End Equipment
_____________________________________
BK0534ITU20 PB400 PUSH BUMPER 2020 UTIL Setina 1 374.25 374.25

NO LIGHTS
FK0402ITU20 PB9 Fender Wraps
ALUM.

PB300/400
Setina 1 426.75 426.75

OEM - FRONT CORNERS

Document Date:

Quote Number:

Sales Quote
To:

Ship
SalesPerson
Ship Via Customer ID
To:

Sell
33869
Mike McGee
60632
Phone:

Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Ship from Lehr's Warehouse
Phone: (831) 758-7325
Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Phone: 925-370-2144 Fax: 925-370-2087
661 Garcia Avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565
3/24/2022
1 Tax Ident. Type Legal Entity
Vehicle Information:

Terms: Net 30
Payment Method:

PRICES ARE VALID FOR 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF QUOTE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Item No. Description
Manufacturer
Name Quantity Unit Price Total Price

CSM - WHELEN VSG MODEM ANTENNA

CSM - CRADLEPOINT MODEM ANTENNA

CSM - MOTOROLA RADIO

CSM - AXON ICV
CSM - CF33 TABLET
CSM - CF33 DOCK

CSM - IKEY KEYBOARD
ELS-270/30 BIG SKY RACKS Big Sky Racks 1 291.66 291.66
ELS-XL L BRACKETS L MOUNTING BKTS Big Sky Racks 1 54.87 54.87 _____________________________________
K9 Equipment
_____________________________________
K9-F28-1-B HAVIS K9 TRANSPORT SYSYTEM -STD 36" BLK 2020 PIU Havis 1 2,385.49 2,385.49 K9-A-104 10" FAN W/ GUARD Havis 1 367.59 367.59
Page:

Document Date:

Quote Number:

Sales Quote
To:

Ship
SalesPerson
Ship Via Customer ID
To:

Sell
33869
Mike McGee
60632
Phone:

Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Ship from Lehr's Warehouse
Phone: (831) 758-7325
Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Phone: 925-370-2144 Fax: 925-370-2087
661 Garcia Avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565
3/24/2022
2 Tax Ident. Type Legal Entity
Vehicle Information:

Terms: Net 30
Payment Method:

PRICES ARE VALID FOR 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF QUOTE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Item No. Description
Manufacturer
Name Quantity Unit Price Total Price
K9-A-103 H2O K9 BOWL Havis 1 64.04 64.04
HP5020B K9 HOT-N-POP PRO Ace K-9 1 1,329.05 1,329.05
_____________________________________
Back End Equipment
_____________________________________
C-TTP-INUT-1201 FOLD-UP CARGO PLATE, 2020-2021 PIU RAISED Havis 1 620.78 620.78 C-TTP-INUT-4 EQUIPMENT TRAY 2020 UTILITY Havis 1 222.28 222.28 SBX-1008 LARGE MODULAR STORAGE DRAWER W/PUSH-BUTTON LOCK Havis 1 1,173.63 1,173.63 SBX-3003 OPEN STORAGE DRAWER TOPPER Havis 1 137.80 137.80 TLI2J ION T-SERIES LINEAR SUPER-LED DUO RED/BLUE Whelen 2 84.99 169.98

CSM - MODEM

CSM - FLARES
VTX609R VERTEX SUPER-LED LIGHT RED Whelen 1 67.80 67.80 VTX609B VERTEX SUPER-LED LIGHT BLUE Whelen 1 67.80 67.80

CSM - WHELEN VSG MODEM // WHELEN CLOUD

CSM - CRADLEPOINT MODEM // ICV
_____________________________________
F Shipping Charges - Estimated Service Items 1 500.00 500.00 15,621.75
1280.33
14,341.42
Total:

Total Sales Tax:

Subtotal:
500.00
13841.42
Amount Exempt from Sales Tax
Amount Subject to Sales Tax
Name: __________________________________________________ Auth. Signature: ________________________________________ Agency Approval
PLEASE READ: No returns without approval and an RMA# will be accepted. All shortages, damage, or return claims must be made within 10 days of invoice date. NO EXCEPTIONS. A copy of the invoice and RMA paperwork must be shipped with returns. All return orders or cancellations are subject to a 25% restocking fee plus freight. Any change orders made 60 days prior to the installation date may be subject to a production delay and pricing changes. PRICES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.

Page:

Document Date:

Quote Number:

Sales Quote
To:

Ship
SalesPerson
Ship Via Customer ID
To:

Sell
33869
Mike McGee
60632
Phone:

Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Ship from Lehr's Warehouse
Phone: (831) 758-7325
Salinas, CA 93901
312 East Alisal St.

Tonya Erickson
Salinas Police Department
Phone: 925-370-2144 Fax: 925-370-2087
661 Garcia Avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565
3/24/2022
3 Tax Ident. Type Legal Entity
Vehicle Information:

Terms: Net 30
Payment Method:

PRICES ARE VALID FOR 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF QUOTE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Line # Item Number Description Quantity Unit List Price Ext. List Price Discount % Discount $ Unit Sale Price Ext. Sale Price APC APX™ 8500
1 M37TSS9PW1AN APX8500 ALL BAND MP MOBILE. 14 $5,667.00 $79,338.00 27.00% $1,530.09 $4,136.91 $57,916.74 06811a GA09007AA ADD: OUT OF THE BOX WIFI PROVISIONING. 14 $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0681 1b GA00318AF ENH: 5 YEAR ESSENTIAL SVC. 14 $352.00 $4,928.00 0.00% $0.00 $352.00 $4,928.00 01851c GA00250AA ADD: WIFI/GNSS STUBBY ANTENNA LMR240. 14 $110.00 $1,540.00 27.00% $29.70 $80.30 $1,124.20 0681 1d G996AS ENH: OVER THE AIR PROVISIONING. 14 $110.00 $1,540.00 27.00% $29.70 $80.30 $1,124.20 06811e GA00580AA ADD: TDMA OPERATION. 14 $495.00 $6,930.00 27.00% $133.65 $361.35 $5,058.90 06811f GA01513AB ADD: ALL BAND MOBILE ANTENNA (7/8/V/U). 14 $105.00 $1,470.00 27.00% $28.35 $76.65 $1,073.10 0681 1g G51AT ENH:SMARTZONE. 14 $1,650.00 $23,100.00 27.00% $445.50 $1,204.50 $16,863.00 06811h GA05509AA DEL: DELETE UHF BAND. 14 -$800.00 -$11,200.00 27.00% -$216.00 -$584.00 -$8,176.00 06811i GA09001AA ADD: WI-FI CAPABILITY. 14 $330.00 $4,620.00 27.00% $89.10 $240.90 $3,372.60 06811j G298AS ENH: ASTRO 25 OTAR W/ MULTIKEY. 14 $814.00 $11,396.00 27.00% $219.78 $594.22 $8,319.08 06811k B18CR ADD: AUXILIARY SPKR 7.5 WATT APX. 14 $66.00 $924.00 27.00% $17.82 $48.18 $674.52 06811l G843AH ADD: AES ENCRYPTION AND ADP. 14 $523.00 $7,322.00 27.00% $141.21 $381.79 $5,345.06 06811m G444AH ADD: APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE. 14 $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 06811n G67EH ADD: REMOTE MOUNT E5 MP. 14 $327.00 $4,578.00 27.00% $88.29 $238.71 $3,341.94 06811o GA01517AA DEL: NO J600 ADAPTER CABLE NEEDED. 14 $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 06811p G806BL ENH: ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OP APX. 14 $567.00 $7,938.00 27.00% $153.09 $413.91 $5,794.74 06811q GA01670AA ADD: APX E5 CONTROL HEAD. 14 $717.00 $10,038.00 27.00% $193.59 $523.41 $7,327.74 06811r W22BA ADD: STD PALM MICROPHONE APX. 14 $79.00 $1,106.00 27.00% $21.33 $57.67 $807.38 06811s G361AH ENH: P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE APX. 14 $330.00 $4,620.00 27.00% $89.10 $240.90 $3,372.60 06811t G387AD ADD: MULITCAST VOTING SCAN. 14 $220.00 $3,080.00 27.00% $59.40 $160.60 $2,248.40 0681 Net Total $120,516.20
Estimated Tax $11,147.75
Estimated Freight $964.13
Grand Total $132,628.08
Quote Number: QUOTE-1684470
Billing Address: Quote Created By: SALINAS POLICE DEPT, CITY OF Quote Date: 2022-03-02 Jim Trevino312 E ALISAL ST Expiration Date: 2022-05-31 Motorola Manufacture RepresentativeSALINAS CA, 93901 Contract Name: 17724 - HGAC (TX) [email protected] 408-640-9861
Customer: SALINAS POLICE DEPT, CITY OF Currency: USDContact Name: Robert HampsonTerms and Conditions: Net 30 days City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-182, Version: 1
Updated Pension Trust Agreements and Related Documents
Approve a Resolution approving the updated Adoption Agreement for the Post-Employment Benefits Trust between the City and PFM Assets Management LLC (“PFM”); and approving the updated Trust Administrative Services Agreement between the City and PFM; and authorizing the City Manager, Director of Finance, and Assistant Finance Director to execute the agreements and other documents required to establish a pension trust and receive trust administration and trust asset investment services on behalf of the City.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 4/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 12, 2022
DEPARTMENT: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
FROM: MARK ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
TITLE: APPROVAL OF UPDATED PENSION TRUST AGREEMENTS AND

RELATED DOCUMENTS
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve a resolution:

1. approving the updated Adoption Agreement For The Post-Employment Benefits Trust between the City and PFM Assets Management LLC (“PFM”);

2. approving the updated Trust Administrative Services Agreement between the City and PFM;

3. authorizing the City Manager, Director of Finance, and Assistant Finance Director to execute the agreements and other documents required to establish a pension trust and receive trust administration and trust asset investment services on behalf of the City.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report and attached resolution request approval of the attached Adoption Agreement For The Post-Employment Benefits Trust, Trust Administrative Services Agreement, and related documents, to update the name of the trustee for the City’s pension trust, which will be established upon execution of the documents.

BACKGROUND:

On March 20, 2018, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing an adoption agreement to establish a Section 115 trust and an agreement with PFM to provide administrative services for the trust. In addition, $3 million was allocated to a reserve for the initial funding of the trust.

On March 8, 2022, staff informed the Council it had discovered the trust had not yet been established and funded and the agreement with PFM and other necessary documents had not been executed. During the March 8th meeting, staff also informed Council it was reviewing the trust adoption agreement, PFM Agreement, and related documents, to determine whether they require updating. Having completed its review, staff has determined the updates required to the Page | 2
agreement, although not substantive with respect to the establishment and administration of the trust or management of the investment of trust assets, require Council approval.

DISCUSSION:

The primary change necessary to the Adoption Agreement For The Post-Employment Benefits Trust (“Adoption Agreement”) and Trust Administrative Services Agreement (“Trust Services Agreement”) is updating of the name of the trustee of the trust from Wells Fargo to Principal Bank.

Wells Fargo and PFM were the parties to the Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement (“Trust Agreement”) established on July 1, 2015 and adopted by Council on March 20, 2018. However, Principal Financial Group, Inc., of which Principal Bank is a wholly owned subsidiary, acquired the Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement and Trust business in July 2019 and completed integration of the in June of 2021. Although the Trust Services Agreement provides for a successor to Wells Fargo as trustee, the Adoption Agreement does not. Since neither of the initial agreements was executed, however, approval of those and related documents reflecting Principal as the trustee is necessary.

Other changes are also included but are non-substantive and/or inure to the benefit of the City, including reduction of the rates of compensation for trust administration services.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Authorization of the updated Adoption Agreement and Trust Services Agreement achieves the Council 2022-2025 Strategic Goals of Effective Government.

DEPARTMENT COORDINATION:

The City Attorney’s Office assisted the Department of Finance staff in the preparation of this staff report and resolution with its review of the trust-related documents.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Establishment of a pension trust will play an important role in the City’s fiscal sustainability, including allowing the City to accumulate funds to reduce the City’s unfunded pension liability and mitigate the impact of fluctuations in future pension costs.

Page | 3
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Adoption Agreement for the Post-Employment Benefits Trust (City, PFM, and Principal)

2. Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement (PFM and Principal)

3. Administrative Services Agreement (City and PFM)

4. Account Acceptance Agreement (City and Principal)

5. Resolution

ADOPTION AGREEMENT

FOR THE

POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS TRUST

PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC,
Trust Administrator

PRINCIPAL BANK
As Successor Trustee
Revision Date: March 2022
Adoption Agreement for the Post-Employment Benefits Trust {00178501.DOCX;1}

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 1 EMPLOYER INFORMATION..................................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 2 PLAN INFORMATION ............................................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 3 TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES .................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 4 INVESTMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 2 ARTICLE 5 TRUST FEES AND EXPENSES................................................................................................ 2 ARTICLE 6 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES.............................................................................. 2 ARTICLE 7 STANDARD OF CARE AND INDEMNIFICATION .................................................................... 3 ARTICLE 8 AMENDMENT............................................................................................................................ 3 ARTICLE 9 NO GUARANTEE OF INVESTMENT RESULTS...................................................................... 3 ADOPTION OF TRUST AGREEMENT ........................................................................................................ 4 EXHIBIT A ..................................................................................................................................................A-1 EXHIBIT B ..................................................................................................................................................B-1 EXHIBIT C................................................................................................................................................. C-1 Adoption Agreement for the Post-Employment Benefits Trust 1 {00178501.DOCX;1}

INTRODUCTION
By executing this Adoption Agreement, the Employer named in Article 2 of this Adoption Agreement hereby adopts and agrees to be bound by the terms of the Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement (the "Trust Agreement"), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A. To the extent there is a conflict between this Adoption Agreement and the Trust Agreement, the Trust Agreement will control. Unless otherwise specified below, initially capitalized terms used in this Adoption Agreement are defined in the Trust Agreement.

ARTICLE 1

EMPLOYER INFORMATION

1.1 Employer's Name, Address, and Telephone Number
(a) Name:
(b) Address:
(c) Telephone:

1.2 Employer's Taxpayer Identification Number:

ARTICLE 2

PLAN INFORMATION

2.1 Plan Names:

OPEB Plan(s):

Pension Plan(s):
(Each a “Plan” and collectively, the “Plans”)

2.2 Employer-designated: Plan Administrator's Name, Title, Address, and Telephone Number:
(a) Name:
(b) Title:
(c) Address:
(d) Telephone:

ARTICLE 3

TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
As a condition of the Employer's participation in the Trust, the Employer and the Trust Administrator have executed the Trust Administrative Services Agreement attached as Exhibit B.

Adoption Agreement for the Post-Employment Benefits Trust 2 {00178501.DOCX;1}
ARTICLE 4

INVESTMENTS
The Employer hereby directs the Trust Administrator to direct the Trustee to invest the assets in the Employer's Account in accordance with the investment strategy mutually agreed to by the Employer and the Trust Administrator as set forth in the Investment Policy Statement attached as Exhibit C.

ARTICLE 5

TRUST FEES AND EXPENSES

5.1 Method of Payment. Unless the Employer otherwise elects below, the Trust Administration Fees (as defined in Section 9.2 of the Trust Agreement), Trustee Fees (as defined in Section 9.3 of the Trust Agreement), and any other reasonable fees and expenses of administering the Employer's Account will be paid from the Employer's Account. In lieu of payments from its Account, the Employer hereby elects to pay the following amounts:
 Trust Administration Fees
 Trustee Fees
 All expenses of the Employer's Account other than fees  Other (please insert description):

Please refer to Section 4 of the Trust Administrative Services Agreement for further information about payment of fees and expenses.

ARTICLE 6

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

6.1 The Employer hereby represents and warrants that each of the following statements is true and correct to the best of its knowledge:
(a) The Employer is a state, a political subdivision of a state or another public agency whose income is excludable from gross income under section 115 of the Code that is established and maintained under the laws of the [State/Commonwealth] of .
(b) The Employer has established and maintains one or more Plans the exclusive purpose of each is to provide OPEB or retirement benefits to its former employees. (c) The exclusive purpose of the Employer's participation in the Trust is to fund the Pension Obligation or OPEB Obligation, or both, under the Employer's Plans.

Adoption Agreement for the Post-Employment Benefits Trust 3 {00178501.DOCX;1}
(d) The Employer's participation in the Trust for the purpose of funding, as applicable, the Pension Obligation or OPEB Obligation, or both, under the Employer's Plans is authorized under the laws of the [State/Commonwealth] of ___. (e) The Employer's Plans do not permit participants to direct or otherwise exercise in any manner, whether direct or indirect, control over the investment of their accounts or benefits accrued under the Plans.
(f) The Employer has received copies, and has read and understands the terms, of the Trust Agreement.

ARTICLE 7

STANDARD OF CARE AND INDEMNIFICATION

7.1 Standard of Care. The Trustee and the Trust Administrator must discharge their duties with respect to the investment and management of Trust assets in accordance with the standard of care set forth in Section 11.2 of the Trust Agreement.

7.2 Employer Indemnification of Trustee. The Employer, from its own funds and not from any assets of the Trust, agrees to indemnify the Trustee and each of its affiliates against, and will hold them harmless from, any and all loss, claims, liability, and expense, including cost of defense and reasonable attorneys’ fees, imposed upon or incurred at any time by any of them by reason of or in connection with the performance of the Trustee’s services under this Agreement, except to the extent such damages resulted from the Trustee’s or affiliate's performance (or non-performance) of its duties under the Trust Agreement in a manner that constitutes willful misconduct or willful breach of the standard of care articulated in Section 11.2 of the Trust Agreement.

7.3 Employer Indemnification of Trust Administrator. Employer, from its own funds and not from any assets of the Trust, agrees to indemnify the Trust Administrator and each of its affiliates against, and will hold them harmless from, any and all damages imposed upon or incurred by any of them by reason of, or in connection with its services under the Trust Agreement or the Trust Administrative Services Agreement, except to the extent that such damages resulted from the Trust Administrator's or affiliate's performance (or non-performance) of its duties under the Trust Agreement or the Trust Administrative Services Agreement in a manner that constitutes willful misconduct or willful breach of the standard of care articulated in Section 11.2 of the Trust Agreement.

ARTICLE 8

AMENDMENT
The Employer understands and agrees that the Trust Agreement may be amended from time to time by the Trustee and the Trust Administrator with the approval of two-thirds of the Employers then participating in the Trust.

ARTICLE 9

NO GUARANTEE OF INVESTMENT RESULTS
The Employer understands and acknowledges that investments in the Trust involve risk and that there is no guarantee of investment performance or other performance of the Trust, including but not limited to custodians, depositories, or counterparties to investment strategies of the Trust.

Adoption Agreement for the Post-Employment Benefits Trust 4 {00178501.DOCX;1}

ADOPTION OF TRUST AGREEMENT
By executing this Adoption Agreement, the Employer hereby adopts and agrees to be bound by the terms of the Trust Agreement and hereby approves, ratifies and confirms the appointment of Principal Bank as the successor Trustee and PFM Asset Management LLC as the Trust Administrator as of the effective date of this Adoption Agreement. This Adoption Agreement and the Trust Agreement are effective on the ___
day of _ , 20 .

EMPLOYER
Agency Name
By:

Its:

Date:

ACCEPTED:

TRUST ADMINISTRATOR

PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
By:

Its:

Date:

TRUSTEE

PRINCIPAL BANK
By:

Its:

Date:

Adoption Agreement for the Post-Employment Benefits Trust A-1 {00178501.DOCX;1}

EXHIBIT A
FEES
Trust Administration Fees
Assets Under Management Annual Fee
Up to $ 25,000,000 0.30%
Next $ 75,000,000 0.15%
Next $ 150,000,000 0.10%
Next $ 250,000,000 0.05%
thereafter 0.02%
Minimum annual account fee is $20,000
Adoption Agreement for the Post-Employment Benefits Trust B-1 {00178501.DOCX;1}

EXHIBIT B

TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Adoption Agreement for the Post-Employment Benefits Trust C-1 {00178501.DOCX;1}

EXHIBIT C

INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT

POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS TRUST AGREEMENT
by and between

PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC,
as Trust Administrator
and
PRINCIPAL BANK, as Trustee
(Effective February 22, 2022)
Effective July 1, 2015
Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement | Table of Contents i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................... 2 ARTICLE 2 ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE ....................................................................................... 3 ARTICLE 3 PARTICIPATION...................................................................................................................... 3

3.1 Eligibility ............................................................................................................................. 3

3.2 Commencement of Participation ........................................................................................ 3

3.3 Termination of Participation. .............................................................................................. 3 ARTICLE 4 GENERAL TRUST PROVISIONS ........................................................................................... 4

4.1 Irrevocable Trust ................................................................................................................ 4

4.2 No Diversion ....................................................................................................................... 4

4.3 Title to Trust Assets ........................................................................................................... 4

4.4 Spendthrift Provision .......................................................................................................... 4

4.5 Account Assets .................................................................................................................. 5

4.6 Separate Accounts. ............................................................................................................ 5 ARTICLE 5 TRUST ADMINISTRATOR ...................................................................................................... 6

5.1 Powers and Duties of the Trust Administrator ................................................................... 6

5.2 Reliance ............................................................................................................................. 6

5.3 Annual Audit ....................................................................................................................... 6

5.4 Trust Administrator not Custodian of Trust Assets ............................................................ 6

5.5 Furnishing of Administrative Services, Office Space, Equipment and Personnel ............. 6

5.6 Registered Investment Advisor .......................................................................................... 7

5.7 Investment Advice to Other Clients .................................................................................... 7

5.8 Notice of Regulatory Action ............................................................................................... 7

5.9 Trust Administrator Separate from Employer and Trustee ................................................ 7

5.10 Recordkeeping ................................................................................................................... 7

5.11 Disclosure Statement ......................................................................................................... 7

5.12 Survival of Agreement and Assignment ............................................................................. 7 ARTICLE 6 TRUSTEE ................................................................................................................................. 8

6.1 Powers and Duties of the Trustee ...................................................................................... 8 ARTICLE 7 INVESTMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 9

7.1 Trustee ............................................................................................................................... 9

7.2 Trust Administrator ............................................................................................................. 9

7.3 Combining of Assets for Investment ................................................................................ 10

7.4 Investment Direction ........................................................................................................ 10

7.5 Broker Executed Investments .......................................................................................... 10

7.6 Affiliated Broker/Dealers .................................................................................................. 10

7.7 Quarterly Reports ............................................................................................................. 10 ARTICLE 8 PAYMENTS FROM TRUST ................................................................................................... 10

8.1 Plan Administrator. ........................................................................................................... 10

8.2 Trustee Reliance .............................................................................................................. 11

8.3 Payments ......................................................................................................................... 11 Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement | Table of Contents ii ARTICLE 9 TAXES, EXPENSES AND COMPENSATION OF THE TRUSTEE AND TRUST ADMINISTRATOR ............................................................................................................. 11

9.1 Payment of Fees .............................................................................................................. 11

9.2 Trust Administration Fees ................................................................................................ 11

9.3 Trustee Fees .................................................................................................................... 11

9.4 Reimbursement of Expenses ........................................................................................... 11 ARTICLE 10 RECORDKEEPING AND VALUATION ............................................................................... 12

10.1 Trust Records ................................................................................................................... 12

10.2 Separate Account Records .............................................................................................. 12

10.3 Quarterly Reports ............................................................................................................. 12

10.4 Valuation .......................................................................................................................... 12 ARTICLE 11 STANDARD OF CARE AND INDEMNIFICATION .............................................................. 12

11.1 Exclusive Purpose ............................................................................................................ 12

11.2 Standard of Care .............................................................................................................. 12

11.3 Trustee Indemnification of Trust Administrator ................................................................ 12

11.4 Trust Administrator Indemnification of Trustee ................................................................ 13

11.5 Survival of Indemnifications ............................................................................................. 13 ARTICLE 12 RESIGNATION AND REMOVAL OF TRUST ADMINISTRATOR ...................................... 13

12.1 Resignation or Removal of Trust Administrator ............................................................... 13

12.2 Designation of Successor Trust Administrator ................................................................. 13

12.3 Compensation Pending Appointment of Successor ........................................................ 13

12.4 Merger, Conversion, Consolidation or Sale of Trust Administrator ................................. 13

12.5 Successor Trust Administrator - No Duty to Investigate .................................................. 13 ARTICLE 13 RESIGNATION AND REMOVAL OF TRUSTEE ................................................................. 13

13.1 Resignation of Trustee ..................................................................................................... 13

13.2 Removal of Trustee .......................................................................................................... 14

13.3 Designation of Successor Trustee ................................................................................... 14

13.4 Application to Court to Designate Successor .................................................................. 14

13.5 Trustee Compensation Pending Appointment of Successor ........................................... 14

13.6 Merger, Conversion, Consolidation or Sale of Trustee .................................................... 14

13.7 Transfer of Assets and Records ...................................................................................... 14

13.8 Payment of Expenses ...................................................................................................... 14

13.9 Successor Trust Administrator - No Duty to Investigate .................................................. 14 ARTICLE 14 AMENDMENT, TERMINATION, MERGER, TRANSFER ................................................... 14

14.1 Amendment ...................................................................................................................... 14

14.2 Termination of Trust. ........................................................................................................ 15

14.3 Termination of Employer's Account. ................................................................................ 15

14.4 Mistake of Fact ................................................................................................................. 16

14.5 Merger or Transfer ........................................................................................................... 16

14.6 Reversion ......................................................................................................................... 16 ARTICLE 15 MISCELLANEOUS .............................................................................................................. 16

15.1 Choice of Law .................................................................................................................. 16

15.2 No Joint Powers Agreement ............................................................................................ 16 Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement | Table of Contents iii

15.3 Authorized Signatories ..................................................................................................... 16

15.4 List of Persons Authorize to Act for Employer ................................................................. 16

15.5 List of Persons Authorized to Act for Trust Administrator ................................................ 16

15.6 Agreement Controls ......................................................................................................... 16

15.7 Severability ....................................................................................................................... 16

15.8 Counterparts .................................................................................................................... 17

15.9 Delivery of Communications ............................................................................................ 17 Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 1

POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS TRUST AGREEMENT
This Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement (“Agreement”) is made effective July 1, 2015, between WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (together with any successor trustee hereunder, the “Trustee”) and PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (together with any successor trust administrator hereunder, the “Trust Administrator”);
WHEREAS, the Trust Administrator wishes to establish a means by which public-agency employers may set aside moneys to fund the employers’ obligations to provide eligible persons (“Beneficiaries”) with (i) pension benefits and (ii) retiree-health benefits and other post-employment benefits other than pension benefits (“OPEB”);
WHEREAS, to accomplish these objectives, the Trustee wishes to establish a multiple-employer trust (“Trust”) for the exclusive purpose of providing amounts to fund participating employers’ obligations to provide OPEB or pension benefits, or both, with the intent that (i) the Trust’s income will be exempt from federal and state income tax (under Internal Revenue Code Section 115 with respect to federal income tax), (ii) contributions and transfers to the Trust will not be taxable to Beneficiaries, (iii) Trust assets are intended to qualify as “plan assets” to the maximum extent permitted under Governmental Accounting Standards Board statements applicable to OPEB and pension benefits, and (iv) all assets of the Trust are and will be irrevocably dedicated to, and will be used for the exclusive purposes of, providing for payments of OPEB and pension obligations as described in this Agreement, and paying the reasonable expenses of administering the Trust, and will not be available to any participating employer’s creditors;
WHEREAS, the Trust Administrator and Trustee are unaffiliated entities; WHEREAS, the Trustee is willing to accept the Trust;
WHEREAS, the Trust is an entity separate from the participating employers for the exclusive benefit of the Beneficiaries and not of the employers;
WHEREAS, the indicia of ownership of Trust assets will be held by the Trustee at all times and the Trust assets will not be considered participating employers’ funds or assets for any purpose; WHEREAS, PFM Asset Management LLC is willing to serve as the Trust Administrator of the Trust with the rights and duties of the Trust Administrator provided in this Agreement; WHEREAS, the Trust Administrator will have exclusive authority and responsibility for the management, administration, and investment of Trust assets in its sole judgment in accordance with this Agreement, without any requirement of consent by any participating employer or, except as expressly provided herein, of notice to any participating employer; WHEREAS, every Employer is a state, political subdivision of a state, or other entity whose income is excludible from gross income under Section 115 of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Trustee is a national banking association and a corporate trustee, with all requisite powers and capabilities to act as the Trustee and administer the Trust as set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust Administrator and the Trustee agree as follows:

Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 2
ARTICLE 1

DEFINITIONS

1.1 "Account" is defined in Section 4.6.

1.2 "Adoption Agreement" means the written instrument by which the Employer adopts and participates in the Trust in accordance with this Agreement, and by which the Employer makes certain elections relating to its participation in the Trust.

1.3 “Agreement” means this Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement between the Trustee and the Trust Administrator.

1.4 "Beneficiary" means a person who is entitled to post-employment benefits under the Employer’s OPEB Plan or Pension Plan.

1.5 "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

1.6 "Employer" means each public agency that executes the Adoption Agreement, thereby becoming a participating agency in the Trust. Such agency must be a state, a political subdivision of a state, or an entity whose income is excludible from gross income under Section 115 of the Code.

1.7 "Investment Policy Statement" means the separate statement of policy for investing the assets of each Employer's Account, a copy of which is attached to the Employer's Adoption Agreement and which is satisfactory to the Employer.

1.8 “Omnibus Account” is defined in Section 4.6.

1.9 "OPEB" means post-employment health and welfare benefits (other than pensions) provided by the Employer under the OPEB Plan to Beneficiaries, including medical, dental, vision, life insurance, long-term care and other similar benefits.

1.10 “OPEB Account” is defined in Section 4.6.

1.11 “OPEB Obligation” means the Employer’s obligation to provide OPEB under the Employer’s OPEB Plan, including the direct costs of the OPEB and the expenses associated with providing the OPEB.

1.12 “OPEB Plan” means the policies, collective bargaining agreement, or other arrangements under which a Beneficiary is entitled to receive OPEB, but only if the policy, agreement, or other arrangement is specified by the Employer in the Adoption Agreement.

1.13 “Pension Account” is defined in Section 4.6.

1.14 “Pension Obligation” means the Employer’s obligation to contribute to the qualified trust of the Employer’s Pension Plan and to pay the expenses associated with providing benefits under the Pension Plan. For this purpose, “qualified trust” means a trust that is qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code and that funds retirement benefits provided under the Pension Plan. A qualified trust is separate from this Trust and will not be considered part of this Trust for any purpose.

1.15 “Pension Plan” means one or more defined-benefit plans, each of which is (i) qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code, (ii) sponsored by the Employer in order to provide retirement benefits to Beneficiaries, including but not limited to a stand-alone plan maintained solely by the Employer or a multiple-employer or multiemployer plan in which the Employer participates along with one or Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 3
more other employers, (iii) partly or wholly funded by the Employer’s contributions, and (iv) specified by the Employer in the Adoption Agreement.

1.16 "Plan Administrator" means the person(s) or entity appointed by the Employer with the plenary authority over the Account. The Plan Administrator may delegate all or any part of its authority to any person(s) or entity. The Employer must, at the time and in the manner specified by the Trustee and the Trust Administrator, certify in writing to the Trustee and the Trust Administrator the names and specimen signatures of the Plan Administrator and its delegates; no appointment or delegation under this Section 1.16 will be effective without that certification. If no person or entity is appointed as Plan Administrator, the Employer will be the Plan Administrator.

1.17 “Trust" means the Post-Employment Benefits Trust established by this Agreement.

1.18 "Trust Administrative Services Agreement" means the agreement in the form attached to each Adoption Agreement and executed between the Employer and the Trust Administrator which authorizes the Trust Administrator to administer the Employer's Account.

1.19 "Trust Administrator" means PFM Asset Management LLC or any successor thereof designated by the Employers under Article 12.

1.20 "Trustee" means Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., or any successor trustee designated by the Trust Administrator in accordance with Article 13.

ARTICLE 2

ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE
The Trust is a multiple-employer trust arrangement established and maintained for the sole purposes of holding the assets used to fund Employers' OPEB Obligations and Pension Obligations, and for paying each Employer's reasonable, allocable expenses of administering the Trust. As such, the Trust is divided into separate Accounts to hold the assets of each participating Employer. Consistent with its purpose, the Trust is intended to qualify as a tax-exempt trust performing an essential governmental function within the meaning of Section 115 of the Code. Each participating Employer retains an interest only in the assets held in that Employer's Account as set forth in Section 4.6.

ARTICLE 3

PARTICIPATION

3.1 Eligibility. Only public agencies may become participating Employers in the Trust. For this purpose, a public agency means a state, political subdivision of a state, or an entity whose income is excludible from gross income under Section 115 of the Code.

3.2 Commencement of Participation. A public agency may become a participating Employer in the Trust by furnishing the Trust Administrator with the following: (i) an executed Adoption Agreement, (ii) an executed Trust Administrative Services Agreement, (iii) a certified copy of a resolution, minutes, or other documentary evidence of the Employer's governing body approving the adoption of the Agreement, and (iv) any other documentation as the Trust Administrator may require. The public agency will become a participating Employer upon the Trust Administrator's written acceptance of the documents described in the preceding sentence.

3.3 Termination of Participation.
(a) An Employer may elect in writing to withdraw from the Trust by filing such election with the Trust Administrator and the Trustee at least 30 days before the effective date of the Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 4
withdrawal. As soon as administratively practicable after the effective date, the Trustee will segregate the withdrawing Employer's Account and transfer the assets in such Account to a trust established by agreement between the Employer and a successor trustee, but only if the Employer certifies in writing to the Trust Administrator that the trust satisfies the requirements of Section 115 of the Code.
(b) In the event the Trust Administrator contemplates an assignment of this Agreement in connection with a change of control or otherwise (collectively, an “assignment”), the Trust Administrator will provide each Employer with written notice at least 60 days before the effective date of such assignment. Upon receipt of such notice, each Employer may elect to terminate participation and withdraw from the Trust at any point prior to the effective date of the assignment as set forth in the notice. If an Employer does not provide notice of its desire to terminate within the 60-day notice period, the Employer’s consent to the contemplated assignment will be implied.
(c) If the Employer has an Omnibus Account and both its Pension Obligation and OPEB Obligation have terminated, Section 14.3(b) will apply. If the Employer has an OPEB Account and its OPEB Obligation has terminated, Section 14.3(c) will apply. If the Employer has a Pension Account and its Pension Obligation has terminated, Section

14.3(d) will apply. An Employer’s Pension Obligation or OPEB Obligation will be deemed terminated for these purposes upon the Trust Administrator’s receipt of a certified copy of a resolution, minutes, or other documentary evidence of the Employer’s governing body approving of the respective termination.
(d) Each Employer agrees to immediately notify the Trust Administrator upon receipt of a determination from the Internal Revenue Service that has the effect of rendering the Employer’s Account ineligible for the tax exemption under Section 115 of the Code, such as any determination that the Employer is not a public agency. In such a case, as soon as administratively practicable after the Trust Administrator notifies the Trustee of the Internal Revenue Service's determination, the Trustee will segregate and place the Employer's Omnibus Account, OPEB Account, and Pension Account (as applicable) in a separate trust established for the exclusive purpose of funding the Employer’s OPEB and Pension Obligation, OPEB Obligation only, or Pension Obligation only, respectively.

ARTICLE 4

GENERAL TRUST PROVISIONS

4.1 Irrevocable Trust. The Trust is irrevocable.

4.2 No Diversion. The principal of the Trust, together with any earnings thereon, will be held in trust by the Trustee separate and apart from any assets of the Employer. Except as provided in Sections 14.3 and 14.4, all assets in each Account and all income thereon are irrevocably dedicated to, and will be used for the exclusive purpose of, making payments of OPEB Obligations or Pension Obligations, as applicable, under the OPEB Plan or Pension Plan for which the Account was established and for paying the reasonable expenses of the Employer's participation in the Trust. At no time will the assets in any Employer's Account be used for, or diverted to, any other purposes, including but not limited to payment of any other Employer's OPEB Obligations or Pension Obligations.

4.3 Title to Trust Assets. The Trustee has exclusive right, title, and interest in and to the assets of the Trust.

4.4 Spendthrift Provision. Assets held in the Trust may not be used to satisfy claims of creditors of any Employer. No Beneficiary will be deemed a third-party beneficiary of this Agreement, nor will any Beneficiary have the right to compel any payment of any amount from the assets of the Trust Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 5
or to enforce any duties of any party to or other entity referred to in this Agreement. Beneficiaries will not have any preferred claim, lien on, or security interest in, or any beneficial interest in any particular assets of the Trust. Beneficiaries will be entitled to receive payments of assets of the Trust only when, as, and if determined by the Employer in accordance with this Agreement.

Except to the extent allowed by law, the Trust is not subject to attachment or garnishment or other legal process by any creditor of any such Beneficiary, nor will any Beneficiary have the right to alienate, anticipate, commute, pledge, encumber, or assign any Trust assets.

4.5 Account Assets. Each Employer may at any time make (or cause to be made) contributions or transfers of cash or other assets acceptable to the Trustee to the Trust from any source. Neither the Trustee nor any Beneficiary or any party to or any other entity referred to in this Agreement will have any right to compel such contributions or transfers or any duty to determine whether any such contributions or transfers comply with the Employer's OPEB Plan or Pension Plan, as applicable. In addition, neither the Trustee nor the Trust Administrator is responsible for separately accounting of any contributions of transfers to the Trust or for determining the source of these amounts.

4.6 Separate Accounts.
(a) Upon the effective date of an Employer's participation in the Trust under Article 3, the Trustee will establish a separate Account to which the Trustee will (i) credit all contributions or transfers from the Employer to the Trust and any income and gains attributable to those amounts, and (ii) debit all distributions, transfers from the Trust, and any losses and expenses attributable to those amounts. The Employer will have an interest only in the assets in the Employer's Account, and those assets will be available only to pay the Employer’s OPEB Obligations and Pension Obligations and will not be available to pay any other Employer’s obligations.
(b) At the direction of the Trust Administrator, the Trustee may pool or commingle for investment purposes assets in the Employer's Account with other assets of the Trust and may invest all or a portion of those assets in any separate fund or account (including common investment pools or trusts) established under this Agreement or other investments permitted under this Agreement as set forth in Article 7. If any of the Employer's Account assets are pooled or commingled for investment purposes with other assets of the Trust or invested with other assets of the Trust in a separate fund or account, the Employer's Account will have an undivided beneficial interest in the Trust itself or in the particular investment funds, as the case may be, and these ownership interests will be represented by units or shares that the Trustee will hold in the Employer's Account.
(c) Each Employer’s Account contains up to three types of subaccounts (each of which may contain one or more subaccounts): an “Omnibus Account,” “Pension Account,” and “OPEB Account”. Assets under the Omnibus Account are available to fund the Employer’s Pension Obligations or OPEB Obligations and allocable expenses of participating in the Trust. Assets under the Employer’s Pension Account are available only to fund the Employer’s Pension Obligation and allocable expenses of participating in the Trust. Assets under the Employer’s OPEB Account are available only to fund the Employer’s OPEB Obligation and allocable expenses of participating in the Trust.

Contributions or transfers to an Employer’s Account will be allocated to the subaccounts as follows:
(1) Contributions and transfers received by the Trust on the Employer’s behalf will be allocated to the Omnibus Account, Pension Account or OPEB Account, or any combination of these subaccounts, as directed by the Plan Administrator.

Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 6
(2) Any contributions or transfers for which the Plan Administrator does not provide allocation directions will be held in the Omnibus Account. The Plan Administrator may at any time direct the allocation of amounts in the Omnibus Account to either the Pension Account or the OPEB Account.
(3) Once allocated to the Pension Account or the OPEB Account, amounts under the Trust may not subsequently be transferred to any other subaccount.

Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, at the Plan Administrator’s direction, the Trustee will reverse any allocation to the Pension Account or OPEB Account and deposit the funds (together with allocable earnings and losses) in one or both of the other two subaccounts, but only if the Plan Administrator notifies the Trustee in writing within 30 days after the allocation that the allocation was due to mistake of fact and provides any other documentation required by the Trustee in its sole discretion.

ARTICLE 5

TRUST ADMINISTRATOR

5.1 Powers and Duties of the Trust Administrator. The Trust Administrator has sole discretion and authority to do any of the following:
(a) At the direction of the Plan Administrator, instruct the Trustee to make distributions from the Employer's Account, including from any subaccount under the Account; (b) Direct the Trustee to pay the fees of the Trust Administrator; (c) Direct the Trustee as to the investment and management of Trust assets; and (d) Such other acts as may be agreed to by the Employer and the Trust Administrator in the Trust Administrative Services Agreement or are necessary or appropriate to effect the intent of this Agreement.

5.2 Reliance. In the performance of its duties hereunder, the Trust Administrator is entitled to rely on, and is under no obligation to investigate instructions or data received from the Plan Administrator, including whether the amount of contributions or transfers made to the Trust by the Employer comply with the Employer's OPEB Plan or Pension Plan. Accordingly, the Trust Administrator will not be liable for action or inaction that is caused directly or indirectly by erroneous or late instructions or data furnished by the Plan Administrator.

5.3 Annual Audit. The Trust Administrator shall appoint a responsible accounting firm to conduct an annual audit of the Trust at the sole expense of the Employers. The results of such audit will be provided to the Trust Administrator, the Trustee, and each of the Employers. The Employer will be solely responsible for any expenses associated with any separate audit of the Employer’s Account or the Employer’s participation in the Trust, and no Trust assets outside the Employer’s Account may be used to pay any part of those expenses.

5.4 Trust Administrator not Custodian of Trust Assets. The Trustee shall have sole custody of cash, securities and other assets of the Trust. The Trust Administrator is authorized to give instructions to the Trustee as to deliveries of securities and payments of cash for the account of the Trust.

The Trust Administrator shall not take possession of or act as custodian for the cash, securities or other assets of the Trust and shall have no responsibility in connection therewith.

5.5 Furnishing of Administrative Services, Office Space, Equipment and Personnel. The Trust Administrator shall furnish at its own expense all necessary administrative services, office space, Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 7
equipment, clerical personnel, telephone and other communication facilities, and executive and supervisory personnel required to perform its duties under this Agreement.

5.6 Registered Investment Advisor. The Trust Administrator hereby represents that it is a registered investment advisor under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The Trust Administrator shall immediately notify every Employer and the Trustee if at any time during the term of this Agreement it is not so registered or if its registration is suspended. The Trust Administrator agrees to perform its duties and responsibilities under this Agreement with reasonable care as provided by law. The federal securities laws impose liabilities under certain circumstances on persons who are required to act in good faith. Nothing in this Agreement shall in any way constitute a waiver or limitation of any rights which the Employers, the Trust Administrator, or the Trustee may have under any federal securities laws.

5.7 Investment Advice to Other Clients. The Employers and the Trustee understand that the Trust Administrator performs investment advisory services for various other clients which may include investment companies, commingled trust funds and individual portfolios. The Employers and the Trustee agree that the Trust Administrator may give advice or take action with respect to any of its other clients which may differ from advice given or the timing or nature of action taken with respect to the Trust, so long as it is the policy and practice of the Trust Administrator, to the extent practical, to allocate investment opportunities to the Trust over a period of time on a fair and equitable basis relative to other clients. The Trust Administrator will not have any obligation to purchase, sell or exchange any security for the Trust solely by reason of the fact that the Trust Administrator, its principals, affiliates, or employees may purchase, sell or exchange such security for the account of any other client or for themselves.

5.8 Notice of Regulatory Action. The Trust Administrator shall promptly give notice to each Employer and the Trustee if the Trust Administrator has received written notice of the filing against it or any professional of the Trust Administrator who has performed any service with respect to the Trust in the 24 preceding months, of any complaints or disciplinary actions by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other regulatory agency or department of the United States, any registered securities exchange, the FINRA, any Attorney General, or any regulatory agency or authority of any State.

5.9 Trust Administrator Separate from Employer and Trustee. The Trust Administrator, its employees, officers and representatives, shall not be deemed to be employees, agents, partners, servants, and/or joint ventures of any of the Employers or the Trustee by virtue of this Agreement or any actions or services rendered under this Agreement.

5.10 Recordkeeping. The Trust Administrator shall maintain appropriate records of all its activities hereunder.

5.11 Disclosure Statement. The Trust Administrator warrants that at least five business days before the execution of this Agreement, it has delivered to the Trustee the Trust Administrator's current Securities and Exchange Commission Form ADV, Part II. The Trustee hereby acknowledges receipt of the disclosure statement at least five business days before the execution of this Agreement.

5.12 Survival of Agreement and Assignment. The provisions of this Agreement will be binding on the Trust Administrator and its successors and assigns. The Trust Administrator may not, however, assign this Agreement without the consent of the Employers, which consent will be obtained through the process described in Section 3.3(b).

Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 8
ARTICLE 6

TRUSTEE

6.1 Powers and Duties of the Trustee. To the extent directed by the Trust Administrator, the Trustee is authorized and empowered to do the following:
(a) Invest and reinvest Trust assets, together with the income therefrom. (b) Establish and maintain Accounts to which the Trustee will (i) credit all contributions or transfers from the Employer to the Trust and any income and gains attributable to those amounts, and (ii) debit all distributions, transfers from the Trust, and any losses and expenses attributable to those amounts.
(c) Maintain accounts with, execute transactions through, and lend stocks, bonds or other securities on an adequately secured basis to, any brokerage firm. (d) Perform accounting and maintain records of each Employer's Account and reconciling such Account with the Trust.
(e) Vote upon or tender any stocks, bonds or other securities and to give general or special proxies or powers of attorney with or without power of substitution; to exercise any conversion privileges, subscription rights or other options of which the Trustee receives actual notice, and to make any payments incidental thereto; to consent to or otherwise participate in corporate reorganizations or other changes affecting corporate securities and to delegate discretionary powers and to pay any assessments or charges in connection therewith; and generally to exercise any of the powers of an owner with respect to stocks, bonds, securities or other property held in Trust. (f) Deposit or invest all or any part of the assets of the Trust in savings accounts or certificates of deposit or other deposits in a bank or savings and loan association or other depository institution, including the Trustee or any of its affiliates; provided that, with respect to such deposits with the Trustee or an affiliate, the deposits bear a reasonable rate of interest.
(g) Invest and reinvest any Trust assets in one or more collective investment funds. (h) Hold, manage, improve, repair and control all investment property, real or personal, forming part of the Trust; to sell, convey, transfer, exchange, partition, pledge, encumber, lease for any term, even extending beyond the duration of this Trust, and otherwise dispose of the same from time to time.
(i) Take such actions as may be necessary or desirable to protect the Trust from loss due to the default on mortgages held in the Trust including the appointment of agents or trustees in such other jurisdictions as may seem desirable, to transfer property to such agents or trustees, to grant to such agents such powers as are necessary or desirable to protect the Trust, to direct such agent or trustee, or to delegate such power to direct, and to remove such agent or trustee.
(j) Settle, compromise or abandon all claims and demands in favor of or against the Trust. (k) Borrow money from any source and to execute promissory notes, mortgages, or other obligations and to pledge or mortgage any Trust assets as security.

Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 9
(l) Designate and engage the services of such agents, representatives, advisers, counsel and accountants, any of whom may be an affiliate of the Trustee or a person who renders services to such an affiliate and, as part of its expenses under this Agreement, to pay their reasonable expenses and compensation.
(m) Hold in cash, without liability for interest, such portion of the Trust assets as is pending investment, or payment of expenses, or distribution.
(n) Make, execute and deliver, as the Trustee, any and all deeds, leases, mortgages, conveyances, waivers, releases or other instruments in writing necessary or appropriate for the accomplishment of any powers listed in this Agreement. (o) Register securities, or any other property, in its name or in the name of any nominee, including the name of any affiliate or the nominee name designated by any affiliate, with or without indication of the capacity in which property shall be held, or to hold securities in bearer form and to deposit any securities or other property in a depository or clearing corporation.
(p) Pay or cause to be paid from the Trust any and all real or personal property taxes, income taxes or other taxes with respect to the Trust.
(q) Enter into interest rate, currency, cash-flow, indexed (including indexed to equities) and other types of swaps and hedges designed to hedge payment, interest rate, currency, duration, spread or similar exposure related to any investment or program of investments of Trust assets or to manage asset/liability matching between investments and OPEB Obligations or Pension Obligations, or both, to be paid therefrom. (r) Exercise all of the further rights, powers, options and privileges granted, provided for, or vested in trustees generally under applicable state law so that the powers conferred upon the Trustee herein shall not be in limitation of any authority conferred by law or under this Agreement, but shall be in addition thereto; provided that such powers satisfy applicable state law requirements (if any).
(s) Any other acts which the Trustee deems necessary or appropriate for the protection of the Trust.

ARTICLE 7

INVESTMENTS

7.1 Trustee. The Trustee shall hold and administer Trust assets without distinction between principal and income.

7.2 Trust Administrator. The Trust Administrator has exclusive authority and responsibility for the management and investment of Trust assets, and the Trustee is authorized and directed to comply with the written directions of the Trust Administrator concerning Trust assets. The Trust Administrator may, from time to time and in its sole discretion, allocate some or all of the cash in an Account at the end of each business day into a sweep investment fund managed by the Trust Administrator. Any amounts held in a sweep investment fund would typically be reallocated on the next business day. The Trust Administrator may not issue any such direction in violation of the terms of the Trust. The Trustee has no duty or authority to (i) review, question, approve or make inquiries as to any investment directions given pursuant to this Agreement, or (ii) determine whether investments directed by the Trust Administrator are in compliance with any applicable State laws.

Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 10

7.3 Combining of Assets for Investment. As instructed by the Trust Administrator, the Trustee may commingle, for investment or administration purposes, the assets (or a portion of the assets) of the Trust in any group trust within the meaning of Section 401(a)(24) of the Code, but only if the commingled trust qualifies as tax exempt under Revenue Ruling 2011-1 and any subsequent relevant guidance from the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, at the Trust Administrator's direction, the Trustee may aggregate the balances of one or more Accounts within the Trust for investment or administrative purposes, in which case the Trustee will credit and debit each Account in accordance with Section 4.6.

7.4 Investment Direction. The Trust Administrator will direct the Trustee to invest the assets of each Employer’s Account in accordance with the principles set forth in the Investment Policy Statement in any investments permitted under this Agreement.

7.5 Broker Executed Investments. Transactions in investments that require execution through a broker will be executed through such broker or brokers as the Trust Administrator will select. The indicia of ownership of Trust assets will be held by the Trustee at all times, and the Trustee shall serve as sole custodian of Trust assets.

7.6 Affiliated Broker/Dealers. Neither the Trustee nor any affiliate of the Trustee will act as broker dealer to execute transactions, including the purchase of securities directly distributed, underwritten or issued by an affiliate of the Trustee, or otherwise provide investment services with respect to the Trust; provided, however, that the Trustee (or its affiliate) may provide ancillary non-advisory investment services with respect to the Trust, including investment of Trust assets in money market or stable value funds distributed, underwritten or issued by the Trustee (or its affiliate) to the extent these investments are permitted under this Agreement. The Trustee and the Trust Administrator will disclose any services or relationships to each Employer before the Employer's commencement of participation in the Trust and at least annually thereafter, and any such services will be provided at standard commission rates, mark-ups or concessions.

7.7 Quarterly Reports. The Trust Administrator will provide to each Employer a quarterly analysis of the performance of the investments of each Account and statement of any changes in investments made in such quarter. The asset information for such analysis will be supplied to Trust Administrator by the Trustee. The report required by this Section 7.7 is separate from the reports required by Section 10.3.

ARTICLE 8

PAYMENTS FROM TRUST

8.1 Plan Administrator.
(a) Each Employer's Plan Administrator has the exclusive authority and responsibility to determine the extent to which amounts will be paid from the Employer's Account. Neither the Trust Administrator nor the Trustee will make or authorize disbursements or transfers from any Employer's Account without the explicit written direction from the Employer's Plan Administrator.
(b) From time to time, the Plan Administrator will direct the Trustee in writing to disburse amounts from the Employer's Omnibus Account for any purpose permitted under Section

8.1(c) or (d).
(c) From time to time, the Plan Administrator will direct the Trustee in writing to disburse amounts from the Employer's OPEB Account for OPEB Obligations to (i) the Plan Administrator for subsequent distribution to or for the benefit of the Employer's Beneficiaries, (ii) any party providing services for the Employer’s OPEB Plan, including but not limited to any insurer, third-party administrator, or other service provider, (iii) the Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 11
Employer's Beneficiaries themselves directly, or (iii) the Employer as reimbursement for any OPEB Obligation amount paid or incurred by the Employer. (d) From time to time, the Plan Administrator will direct the Trustee in writing to disburse amounts from the Employer's Pension Account to (i) the Pension Plan as contributions to the plan’s qualified trust, (ii) the Plan Administrator, for subsequent payment of the Employer’s Pension Obligation, (iii) any party providing services for the Employer’s Pension Plan, including but not limited to any insurer, third-party administrator, or other service provider, or (iv) the Employer as reimbursement for any Pension Obligation amount paid or incurred by the Employer.

8.2 Trustee Reliance. Except as otherwise provided by law, the Trustee will be fully protected in making payments out of any Employer's Account at the direction of the Employer's Plan Administrator. The Trustee’s sole obligation as to those disbursements shall be to observe the instructions of the Plan Administrator to the extent that the Account has assets to make disbursements as instructed by the Plan Administrator. Nothing in the Trust or any Plan shall constitute a guarantee that Trust assets will be sufficient to pay the Employer’s OPEB Obligations or Pension Obligations.

8.3 Payments. The Trustee is authorized to disburse amounts from the Trust to pay the fees and expenses of administering the Trust as expressly authorized by this Agreement, or as instructed in writing by the Trust Administrator.

ARTICLE 9

TAXES, EXPENSES AND COMPENSATION OF THE TRUSTEE AND TRUST ADMINISTRATOR

9.1 Payment of Fees. Subject to Section 4.2, each Employer’s Account will be charged for allocable Trustee Fees, Trust Administration Fees, and any other fees specified in the Trust Administrative Service Agreement. To the extent permitted in the Trust Administrative Service Agreement and Adoption Agreement, the Employer may elect in the Adoption Agreement to instead pay such fees from the Employer’s assets.

9.2 Trust Administration Fees. “Trust Administration Fees” means the fees of the applicable investment funds and the fees for all services of the Trust Administrator specified in the Trust Administrative Services Agreement. The Trust Administrator is authorized to instruct the Trustee to disburse funds from the Account for the payment of the Trust Administration Fees to the Trust Administrator to the extent not paid by the Employer or deducted from the gross earnings of the investment funds. If and to the extent that the Trustee requests that the Trust Administrator render services to the Trust other than those to be rendered by the Trust Administrator hereunder, such additional services will be compensated separately on terms to be agreed upon between the Trust Administrator and the Trustee.

9.3 Trustee Fees. "Trustee Fees" means the Trustee's fees for services provided by it under this Agreement. These fees will be separately disclosed to the Employer prior to the commencement of the Employer's participation in the Trust. The Trustee is authorized to disburse funds from the Trust to itself for the payment of these fees to the extent not paid by the Employers. The Trustee will notify the Trust Administrator in writing of any change in the Trustee Fees at least 90 days before the effective date of the change.

9.4 Reimbursement of Expenses. Except as expressly provided otherwise herein, the Trustee is authorized to disburse funds from the Trust to pay all reasonable expenses of administering the Trust, including, without limitation, any taxes payable by the Trust, fees and expenses of legal counsel to the Trust, insurance premiums, and expenses associated with performing the annual audit provided for in Section 5.3.

Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 12
ARTICLE 10

RECORDKEEPING AND VALUATION

10.1 Trust Records. The Trustee will keep accurate and detailed records of all investments, receipts, disbursements, and all other transactions, including such specific records as may be agreed upon in writing between the Trust Administrator and the Trustee with respect to the Trust.

10.2 Separate Account Records. The Trustee will keep accurate and detailed records of all investments, receipts, disbursement, and all other transactions with respect to each separate Employer Account.

10.3 Quarterly Reports. Within 45 days after the last day of each calendar quarter (and within 60 days after removal or resignation of the Trustee), the Trustee will deliver to the Trust Administrator and each Employer a written account of the Employer's Account during such calendar quarter (or during the period from the close of the last preceding calendar quarter to the date of such removal or resignation), setting forth all deposits, investments, receipts, disbursements and other transactions effected by it with respect to the Account, including a description of transfers made and income received by the Account, all securities and investments purchased and sold with the cost or net proceeds of such purchases or sales (accrued interest paid or receivable being shown separately), all disbursements for the payment of OPEB Obligations and Pension Obligations, administrative expenses (any amounts paid to the Trustee shown separately) of the Trust paid from the Account, and showing all cash, securities and other property held in the Account at the end of such calendar quarter or as of the date of such removal or resignation, as the case may be.

10.4 Valuation. All securities will be valued at fair market value as of the date of valuation, as determined by the Trustee on the basis of all available information that the Trustee deems reasonable.

ARTICLE 11

STANDARD OF CARE AND INDEMNIFICATION

11.1 Exclusive Purpose. Except as provided in Sections 14.3 and 14.4, all Trust assets and all income thereon will be used for the exclusive purpose of providing for the payments of OPEB Obligations and Pension Obligations and for paying the reasonable expenses of administering the Trust.

11.2 Standard of Care. The Trustee and the Trust Administrator, when making, selling or otherwise managing investments of the funds, will discharge their duties with respect to the investment of the funds (i) solely in the interest of, and for the exclusive purposes of funding OPEB Obligations and Pension Obligations, maximizing the amount available for such funding, and paying reasonable expenses of administering the Trust, and (ii) with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiar with these matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims. The Trust Administrator will invest assets in each Employer’s Account accordance with the applicable Investment Policy Statement, but only to the extent that doing so does not conflict with the duties described in the preceding sentence.

11.3 Trustee Indemnification of Trust Administrator. The Trustee, solely from its assets and not from the Trust assets, will indemnify the Trust Administrator and each of its affiliates against, and will hold them harmless from, any and all damages imposed upon or incurred by any of them by reason of, or in connection with the Trustee's or affiliate's performance (or non-performance) of its duties under this Agreement in a manner that constitutes willful misconduct or willful breach of the standard of care articulated in Section 11.2, except to the extent that such damages resulted from the Trust Administrator's or affiliate's performance (or non-performance) of its duties under this Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 13
Agreement in a manner that constitutes willful misconduct or willful breach of the standard of care articulated in Section 11.2.

11.4 Trust Administrator Indemnification of Trustee. The Trust Administrator, solely from its assets and not from the Trust assets, will indemnify the Trustee and each of its affiliates against, and will hold them harmless from, any and all damages imposed upon or incurred by any of them by reason of, or in connection with the Trustee’s and each of its affiliates’ services under this Agreement, except to the extent that such damages resulted from the Trustee's or affiliate's performance (or non-performance) of its duties under this Agreement in a manner that constitutes willful misconduct or willful breach of the standard of care articulated in Section 11.2. The foregoing shall in no way limit or otherwise restrict any rights to indemnification which the Trust Administrator may have under any Adoption Agreement executed and delivered by the Trust Administrator and an Employer.

11.5 Survival of Indemnifications. The indemnification obligations provided for in this Agreement will survive the termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 12

RESIGNATION AND REMOVAL OF TRUST ADMINISTRATOR

12.1 Resignation or Removal of Trust Administrator. The Trust Administrator may resign at any time upon 90 days’ prior written notice to each of the Employers, which notice may be waived in writing by the Employers. With the approval of at least two-thirds of the participating Employers, the Employers may remove the Trust Administrator upon 90 days’ prior written notice to the Trust Administrator and the Trustee, which notice may be waived by the Trust Administrator.

12.2 Designation of Successor Trust Administrator. Upon notice of the Trust Administrator’s resignation, the Employers will promptly designate a successor Trust Administrator qualified to act as the Trust Administrator of the Trust under applicable state law, such resignation to be effective upon acceptance of appointment by such successor Trust Administrator. The Employers will not remove the Trust Administrator unless Employers have designated such a successor Trust Administrator who shall have agreed with Employers and the Trustee to act as the Trust Administrator under an agreement substantially similar to this Agreement.

12.3 Compensation Pending Appointment of Successor. Until a successor Trust Administrator is appointed and assumes its duties as the Trust Administrator under this Agreement, the Trust Administrator shall be entitled to compensation for its services in accordance with Article 9.

12.4 Merger, Conversion, Consolidation or Sale of Trust Administrator. Any company into which the Trust Administrator may be merged or converted or with which it may be consolidated or any company resulting from any merger, conversion or consolidation to which it shall be a party or any company to which the Trust Administrator may sell or transfer all or substantially all of its investment advisory business, shall be, with the prior consent of Employers in the manner set forth in Section 3.3(b), the successor to such Trust Administrator.

12.5 Successor Trust Administrator - No Duty to Investigate. A successor Trust Administrator shall have no duty to audit or otherwise inquire into the acts or transactions of its predecessor.

ARTICLE 13

RESIGNATION AND REMOVAL OF TRUSTEE

13.1 Resignation of Trustee. The Trustee may resign at any time upon 90 days prior written notice to the Trust Administrator, which notice may be waived by the Trust Administrator.

Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 14

13.2 Removal of Trustee. With approval of at least two-thirds of the participating Employers, the Employers may instruct the Trust Administrator in writing to remove the Trustee (or any successor trustee) upon 90 days prior written notice to the Trustee, which notice may be waived in writing by the Trustee, and to replace the Trustee with a corporate Trustee satisfactory to the Trust Administrator in its sole judgment.

13.3 Designation of Successor Trustee. Upon notice of the Trustee’s resignation or removal, the Trust Administrator shall promptly designate a successor corporate Trustee qualified to act as the Trustee of the Trust under applicable state law, such resignation or removal to be effective upon acceptance of appointment by such successor corporate Trustee.

13.4 Application to Court to Designate Successor. If the Trust Administrator does not designate a successor corporate Trustee, or if a successor corporate Trustee designated by the Trust Administrator has not accepted its appointment within 90 days after the Trustee gives notice of its resignation or receives notice of removal, the Trustee may, at the expense of the Trust, apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to appoint a successor corporate Trustee.

13.5 Trustee Compensation Pending Appointment of Successor. Until a successor corporate Trustee is appointed and assumes its duties, the Trustee shall be entitled to compensation for its services according to its fee schedule then in effect for acting as the Trustee in accordance with the Trust.

13.6 Merger, Conversion, Consolidation or Sale of Trustee. Any company into which the Trustee may be merged or converted or with which it may be consolidated or any company resulting from any merger, conversion or consolidation to which it shall be a party or any company to which the Trustee may sell or transfer all or substantially all of its corporate trust business, shall be, with the prior written consent of the Trust Administrator, the successor to such Trustee.

13.7 Transfer of Assets and Records. A resigning Trustee shall transfer the Trust assets and shall deliver the books, accounts and records of the Trust to the successor corporate Trustee as soon as practicable.

13.8 Payment of Expenses. A resigning Trustee is authorized to reserve such amount as may be necessary for the payment of its fees and expenses incurred prior to its resignation or removal, and the Trust assets shall remain liable to reimburse the resigning or removed Trustee for any costs or fees payable to the Trustee under the terms of this Agreement.

13.9 Successor Trust Administrator - No Duty to Investigate. A successor corporate Trustee shall have no duty to audit or otherwise inquire into the acts or transactions of its predecessor.

ARTICLE 14

AMENDMENT, TERMINATION, MERGER, TRANSFER

14.1 Amendment. With the approval of at least two-thirds of the Employers then participating in the Trust, the Trust Administrator and the Trustee may amend the Trust; provided, however, that no amendment may:
(a) cause any assets held in any Employer's Account to be used for or diverted to any purpose other than for the exclusive purposes of funding the Employer’s OPEB Obligations or Pension Obligations, as applicable, or defraying the reasonable expenses of administering the Account; or
(b) eliminate the requirement that none of the assets held in any Employer's Account revert to the Employer prior to the satisfaction of all OPEB Obligations or Pension Obligations Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 15
(as applicable) under the OPEB Plan or Pension Plan for which the Account was established.

14.2 Termination of Trust.
(a) The Trust may be terminated by the unanimous agreement of all Employers, which action must be in writing and delivered to the Trustee and Trust Administrator. Upon termination of the Trust, the Trust will continue to exist and the Trust Administrator and the Trustee will continue to have all powers provided in this Agreement as are necessary or desirable for the orderly liquidation and distribution of Trust assets in accordance with the provisions hereof until all Trust assets have been distributed. The Trustee will distribute assets remaining in each Employer’s Account at the direction of the Trust Administrator in the following order of priority: (1) payment of reasonable administrative expenses (including taxes and termination costs) of the Trust, (2) payment of the OPEB Obligations and Pension Obligations currently payable under the Employer’s OPEB Plan and Pension Plan, as applicable, and (3) payment to a trust that satisfies the requirements of Section 115 of the Code and any other applicable law.
(b) Contributions and transfers to the Trust are conditioned on initial qualification of the Trust under Section 115 of the Code. If the Trust receives an adverse determination with respect to its initial qualification, then the Trust and this Trust Agreement will automatically terminate without any action by any Employer or other parties. After such termination, the assets of each Employer’s Omnibus Account, Pension Account, or OPEB Account, as applicable, will be returned by the Trustee to the Employer as directed by the Plan Administrator in accordance with this Section 14.2(b) to the extent permitted by law and consistent with the requirements of Section 115 of the Code. This Section 14.2(b) will cease to apply upon the Trust’s receipt of a favorable determination with respect to its initial qualification.

14.3 Termination of Employer's Account.
(a) An Employer's Account will automatically terminate upon the termination of the Employer's participation in the Trust and the transfer of the assets in the Employer's Account under Section 3.3.
(b) If an Employer has an Omnibus Account and maintains an OPEB Plan or Pension Plan, but not both, Section 14.3(b) or (c) (as applicable) will apply to the assets in the Omnibus Account. If the Employer maintains both an OPEB Plan and Pension Plan, the Trustee will continue to maintain, and will have all of the powers and duties under this Agreement with respect to, the Employer's Omnibus Account until the Employer’s OPEB Obligation under its OPEB Plan and Pension Obligation under its Pension Plan are fully satisfied.

Any assets remaining in the Employer's Omnibus Account after both such obligations are fully satisfied will be paid to the Employer to the extent permitted by law and consistent with the requirements of Section 115 of the Code.
(c) If an Employer's OPEB Plan terminates, the Trustee will continue to maintain, and will have all of the powers and duties under this Agreement with respect to, the Employer's OPEB Account until the Employer’s OPEB Obligation under its OPEB Plan is fully satisfied. Any assets remaining in the Employer's OPEB Account after its OPEB Obligation is fully satisfied will be paid to the Employer to the extent permitted by law and consistent with the requirements of Section 115 of the Code. (d) If an Employer's Pension Plan terminates, the Trustee will continue to maintain, and will have all of the powers and duties under this Agreement with respect to, the Employer's Pension Account until the Employer’s Pension Obligation under its Pension Plan is fully satisfied. Any assets remaining in the Employer's Pension Account after its Pension Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 16
Obligation is fully satisfied will be paid to the Employer to the extent permitted by law and consistent with the requirements of Section 115 of the Code.

14.4 Mistake of Fact. At the written direction of an Employer and after receipt of any indemnification that the Trustee may require from the Employer, the Trustee will return any contribution or transfer made to the Trust by the Employer due a mistake of fact, excluding any earnings but reduced by any losses, to the Employer within one year after the Employer discovers the mistake.

14.5 Merger or Transfer. At any time that there is in existence any trust created by Employer which satisfies the requirements in Articles 2 and 4, at the direction of Employer, the Trust may be merged with such trust, or all or part of its assets (net of any amount as may be reasonably necessary to pay the fees and expenses of the Trust Administrator, the Trustee and other expenses of the Trust) transferred to such trust; provided, however, that no such merger or transfer may increase the Trustee’s obligations under this Agreement without the Trustee’s written approval, no such merger or transfer may render the Trust “revocable” or otherwise adversely affect the status of the Trust as described in Articles 2 and 4.

14.6 Reversion. Neither the Trust Administrator nor the Employers nor any entity related to any of them will have any beneficial interest in the Trust or receive any amounts upon termination of the Trust or at any other time, except as provided in Sections 14.3 and 14.4.

ARTICLE 15

MISCELLANEOUS

15.1 Choice of Law. The Trust is governed by, and will be interpreted in a manner consistent with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and, to the extent applicable, the Internal Revenue Code.

15.2 No Joint Powers Agreement. This Agreement is not a joint exercise of powers agreement, does not create a joint powers or joint action authority, and the obligations of Employer, the Trustee, and the Trust Administrator are several and not joint. Neither the Trustee nor the Trust Administrator is responsible for any contributions, costs, benefits, distributions, acts or omissions of the Employers or the Plan Administrators.

15.3 Authorized Signatories. Each party to this Agreement represents and warrants that the person or persons signing this Agreement on behalf of such party are authorized and empowered to sign and deliver this Agreement for such party.

15.4 List of Persons Authorize to Act for Employer. Each of the Employers will certify to the Trust Administrator and the Trustee in writing of the person or persons, by office or other position of employment, who are authorized to act on behalf of the Employer in all matters relating to the Trust.

15.5 List of Persons Authorized to Act for Trust Administrator. The Trust Administrator shall notify the Trustee and each of the Employers in a separate writing of all those who are authorized to act on behalf of the Trust Administrator in all matters relating to the Trust.

15.6 Agreement Controls. If there is any conflict between any Pension Plan or OPEB Plan and this Agreement, this Agreement will control.

15.7 Severability. In the event any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid for any reason, such invalidity will not affect any other provisions of this Agreement and this Agreement will be construed and enforced as if the invalid provision had never been included.

Post-Employment Benefits Trust Agreement 17

15.8 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be considered as an original.

15.9 Delivery of Communications. All communications under this Agreement must be in writing and will be deemed to have been duly given (1) on the date of receipt if served personally or by confirmed facsimile or other similar communication; (2) on the first business day after sending if sent for guaranteed next day delivery by a next-day courier service; or (3) on the fourth business day after mailing if mailed to the party or parties to whom notice is to be given by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and properly addressed as follows:

If to an Employer:

If to Trust Administrator:

If to Trustee:

At the address listed for such purpose on the
Employer's Adoption Agreement
PFM Asset Management LLC
1735 Market Street, 43rd Floor
Philadelphia i , PA 19103
Attention: Leo Karwejna
Principal Bank
222 South Ninth Street, 13th Floor
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Attention: Doug Mason
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of establishment of the Trust created hereunder, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date set forth below:

PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC,
As Trust Administrator
By: � ,v\,1-----
Name: M,ohoeA UJ� H1'4 g14js
Title: .Ma.\Mt-fj f Yl V D, g e,,ta R
Date: J-tt\ �-0 l$'"
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
:�:Tr$��Name: Lc=c.

Title: v,·c..g. Pr�s it>£,-.);
Date: 7 /1:1t/ 1S
•
18 TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
This agreement ("Agreement") is made this day of , 20 , by and between (the "Employer") and PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Trust Administrator").

WHEREAS, the Employer has adopted one or more plans, policies, or collective bargaining agreements ("Plans") the exclusive purpose of each is to provide other postemployment health and welfare benefits (other than pensions) ("OPEB") or retirement benefits; and
WHEREAS, the Trust Administrator; Principal Bank, as successor trustee to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the "Trustee"); and various public agencies have entered into an agreement (the "Trust Agreement") establishing the Post-Employment Benefits Trust (the "Trust"); and WHEREAS, the Employer has adopted the Trust by executing the adoption agreement to which this Agreement is attached (the "Adoption Agreement") in order to fund the OPEB and retirement benefits payable under the Plans; and
WHEREAS, the Employer wishes to retain the services of the Trust Administrator to administer the Employer's account under the Trust ("Account").

NOW THEREFORE, the Employer and the Trust Administrator hereby agree as follows:

Capitalized words not defined this document are defined in the Trust Agreement.

1. Trust Administrator Services
The Trust Administrator will provide the following services for the Employer's Account:

1.1 Administrative Services
A. Instruct the Trustee to make disbursements from the Employer's Account at the direction of the Plan Administrator for the payment of OPEB or retirement benefits under the Employer's Plans funded by the Account; B. Coordinate the annual audit of the Trust, the results of which will be provided to the Employer; and
C. Coordinate such other actions with the Trustee as directed by the Plan Administrator that are within the scope of the Trust Administrator's duties under the Trust Agreement.

1.2 Investment Management Services
A. Determine the asset allocation of investments in the Employer's Account ("Investment Strategy") based on information provided by the Employer or the Plan Administrator, including the anticipated amounts of cash required by the Plans for distributions and other expenses, and the appropriate risk tolerance for the Plans based on the Plans' asset-liability characteristics and the Employer's resources;
B. Prepare a recommended policy statement of the Account's Investment Strategy acceptable to the Employer to the extent necessary to accomplish the Account's Investment Strategy ("Investment Policy Statement");
C. Execute the Account's Investment Strategy by instructing the Trustee to buy and sell shares of investments permitted under the Trust in accordance with the Investment Policy Statement;
D. In consultation with the Employer, reassess and alter the Investment Strategy and Investment Policy Statement at least annually to the extent necessary to "rebalance" the Account investments;
E. Perform reviews at least annually of the performance of the investments held in the Account, add or reduce allocations to each investment or add or delete investments in its judgment (to the extent permitted under the Investment Policy Statement and the Trust), and promptly advise the Employer of any additions or deletions of Account investments; and F. Provide the Employer after the end of each calendar quarter with an analysis of the performance of the investments of the Account and a statement of the changes in the investments made during such calendar quarter.

2. Compensation

2.1 Fees. For all services provided by the Trust Administrator under this Agreement and the Trustee under the Trust Agreement, the following fees will apply:
[Fees will be determined on an employer-by-employer basis. This section will itemize fees by category: Trust Administration Fees, Trustee Fees, and other categories as appropriate.]
The Trust Administrator will notify the Employer in writing of any change in the above fee amounts at least 60 days before the effective date of the change.

2.2 Fees for Additional Services. If and to the extent that the Employer requests the Trust Administrator to render services other than those described under this Agreement, such additional services will be compensated separately on terms to be agreed upon between the Trust Administrator and the Employer.

2.3 Pooled Proprietary Investments. Assets invested by the Trust Administrator under the terms of this Agreement may, from time to time, be invested in mutual funds managed by the Trust Administrator (a “Proprietary Fund”). With respect to any such investment, the Employer shall be entitled to a credit against fees described in this Section, in an amount at least equal to the amount of the investment advisory fee then in effect and net of any fee waivers applicable to such investment advisory fee, which the Trust Administrator receives from the Proprietary Fund for the investment of the assets hereunder. Expenses of the Proprietary Fund, including compensation for the Trust Administrator, are described in the relevant prospectus or information statement and are paid from the Pool.

3. Expenses

3.1 Furnishing of Administrative Services, Office Space, Equipment and Personnel. The Trust Administrator will furnish at its own expense all necessary administrative services, office space, equipment, clerical personnel, telephone and other communication facilities, investment advisory facilities, and executive and supervisory personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement, inclusive of reasonable costs required to attend meetings with the Employer.

3.2 Expenses of Employer’s Account. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Employer agrees to pay all expenses under the Trust incurred by (or allocable to) the Employer’s Account including, without limitation, taxes, expenses (including front- or back-end charges) of an investment fund, fees and expenses of the Account’s independent auditors and legal counsel, insurance premiums, expenses of the Trustee, the keeping of books and accounts, and the allocable costs of the annual Trust audit described in Section 5.3 of the Trust Agreement. The Trust Administrator will calculate expenses allocable to the Account on a pro-rata basis, or in any other reasonable and equitable manner determined by the Trust Administrator.

4. Payment Terms. At the end of each calendar month, the Trust Administrator will prepare and submit to the Employer for approval a monthly invoice for fees and expenses under this Agreement as described in Sections 2.1 and 3.2. The invoice will include a statement of the basis upon which the fees and expenses were calculated.

Except to the extent that the Employer has elected in the Adoption Agreement to pay such invoices, the Employer authorizes the Trust Administrator to charge such invoices to the Employer’s Account and authorizes and instructs the Trustee to disburse funds from the Account for the payment of the fees and expenses. If the Employer has elected in the Adoption Agreement to pay such invoices, but does not fully pay any invoice within 15 calendar days after the invoice’s postmark, then the Employer hereby authorizes the Trust Administrator to charge the unpaid amount to the Account and instructs the Trustee to disburse such amount from the Account for the payment of the fees and expenses. If sufficient funds are not available or cannot for any reason otherwise be disbursed from the Account, the Trust Administrator will notify the Employer, and the Employer will pay the unpaid amount to the Trust Administrator from other sources within 10 calendar days after receiving the notice.

5. Registered Advisor; Duty of Care. The Trust Administrator hereby represents it is a registered investment advisor under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The Trust Administrator will immediately notify the Employer if at any time during the term of this Agreement it is not so registered or if its registration is suspended. The Trust Administrator agrees to perform its duties and responsibilities under this Agreement with reasonable care. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Trust Administrator has no responsibility or liability for determining whether or to what extent the Trust or Trustee is eligible to receive funds from the Employer under applicable law; and it is the Employer’s sole responsibility to make such determination upon the establishment of its account under the Trust and at all subsequent times. The federal securities laws impose liabilities under certain circumstances on persons who act in good faith. Nothing herein in any way constitutes a waiver or limitation of any rights which the Employer or the Trust may have under any federal securities laws. The Employer hereby authorizes the Trust Administrator to sign an Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 on behalf of the Employer and to deliver such form to broker-dealers or others from time to time as required in connection with securities transactions pursuant to this Agreement.

6. Trust Administrator's Other Clients. The Employer understands that the Trust Administrator performs investment advisory services for various other clients which may include investment companies, commingled trust funds and/or individual portfolios. The Employer agrees that the Trust Administrator, in the exercise of its professional judgment, may give advice or take action with respect to any of its other clients which may differ from advice given or the timing or nature of action taken with respect to the Account. The Trust Administrator has no obligation to purchase, sell or exchange any security for the Employer solely by reason of the fact that the Trust Administrator, its principals, affiliates, or employees may purchase, sell or exchange such security for the account of any other client or for itself or its own accounts.

7. Term of Agreement. This Agreement will remain in effect until terminated by either party at any time by giving 90 days’ written notice to the other party of its intent to terminate.

8. Force Majeure. The Trust Administrator has no liability for any losses arising out of the delays in performing or inability to perform the services which it renders under this Agreement which result from events beyond its control, including interruption of the business activities of the Trust Administrator or other financial institutions due to acts of God, acts of governmental authority, acts of war, terrorism, civil insurrection, riots, labor difficulties, or any action or inaction of any carrier or utility, or mechanical or other malfunction.

9. Disciplinary Actions. The Trust Administrator will promptly notify the Employer if the Trust Administrator is found to have violated any state or federal securities law or regulation in any final and unappealable judgment in any criminal action or civil suit in any state or federal court or in any disciplinary proceeding before the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other regulatory agency or department of the United States, any registered securities exchange, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or any regulatory authority of any State based upon the performance of services as an investment advisor.

10. Confidentiality. The Trust Administrator will not disclose any information relating to the Plans or the Account except to authorized officers of the Employer, the Plan Administrator the Trustee and third parties retained by the Trust Administrator to perform specific services within this Agreement without the Employer's consent, unless such disclosure is required by law or by regulatory or judicial process. The Employer will not disclose any information relating the Trust to individuals other than authorized officers of the Employer and the Plan Administrator, or their respective designees, without the Trust Administrator's consent.

11. Independent Contractor. The Trust Administrator, its employees, officers and representatives, will not be deemed to be employees, agents (except as to the purchase or sale of securities described in Section 1), partners, servants, and/or joint ventures of the Employer or the Account by virtue of this Agreement or any actions or services rendered under this Agreement.

12. Records. The Trust Administrator will maintain appropriate records of all its activities hereunder. The Trust Administrator will use its best efforts to provide the Employer with a statement within 60 days following the end of each calendar quarter showing deposits, withdrawals, purchases and sales (or maturities) of investments, earnings received during the quarter, and the value of assets held on the last business day of the calendar quarter, all as provided for in the Trust Agreement, based on the information requested from and furnished to it by the Trustee.

13. Ownership of Reports and Documents. The Trust Administrator acknowledges that the originals of all correspondence, documents, reports and records produced in the course of providing the services pursuant to this Agreement are the property of the Employer. In the event this Agreement is terminated, the Trust Administrator agrees to provide such originals to the Employer. The Trust Administrator will not furnish copies of any such correspondence, documents reports and records to any party other than the Employer or the Plan Administrator, or their respective designees, or third parties retained by the Trust Administrator to perform services under this Agreement without the Employer's consent.

14. Trust Administrator's Brochure and Brochure Supplement. The Trust Administrator warrants that it has delivered to the Employer prior to the execution of this Agreement, the Trust Administrator's current Securities and Exchange Commission Form ADV, Part 2A (brochure) and Part 2B (brochure supplement. The Employer acknowledges receipt of such brochure and brochure supplement prior to the execution of this Agreement.

15. Amendment. This Agreement shall not be changed, modified, terminated or discharged in whole or in part, except by an instrument in writing signed by both parties hereto, or their respective successors or assigns.

16. Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement are binding on the Trust Administrator and its respective successors and assigns, provided, however, that the rights and obligations of the Trust Administrator may not be assigned without the Employer's consent.

17. Designees. In accordance with Section 1.8 of the Trust Agreement, the Employer will certify to the Trust Administrator in writing the persons or entity with the plenary authority pursuant to applicable state law over the investment and management of the Employer's Plans or its designee ("Plan Administrator"). The Plan Administrator has the authority to act on behalf of, and to exercise any of the rights of, the Employer under this Agreement.

In accordance with Section 6.1(l) of the Trust Agreement, the Trust Administrator may designate and engage the services of such agents, representatives, advisors, counsel, accountants and other third parties, including affiliates of the Trust Administrator, and delegate its authority to perform specified services under this Agreement to such third parties. Any such designee shall have the authority to perform the services delegated to it by the Trust Administrator. Any officer of the Trust Administrator has the authority to exercise any of the rights of the Trust Administrator under this Agreement.

18. Notice. Written notices required under this Agreement will be sent by regular mail, certified mail, overnight delivery or courier, and will be deemed given when received at the parties’ respective addresses shown below. Either party must notify the other party in writing of a change in address.

Employer's Address:

Attn:

Trust Administrator's Address: With a Copy to:

PFM Asset Management LLC PFM Asset Management LLC
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Attn: Attn: Chief Administrative Officer

19. Applicable Law. This Agreement will be construed, enforced and administered according to the laws of the [Commonwealth] [OR] [State] of [State Name], without regard to its conflicts of law principles. In the event that either party institutes legal proceedings against the other, venue will lie in any court of competent jurisdiction in the [Commonwealth] [OR] [State] of [State Name].

20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including exhibits and any other documents referenced herein, constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements, and understandings, whether written or oral, with respect thereto.

21. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the Agreement will continue in full force and effect.

22. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed will be deemed to be a complete original and all of which together will constitute one and the same Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their authorized officers on the date set forth in the first paragraph of this Agreement.

TRUST ADMINISTRATOR

PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
By:

Its:

AGENCY
[NAME OF AGENCY]
By:

Its:
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING TRUST ADOPTION AND TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY AND PFM ASSETS

MANAGEMENT LLC AND AUTHORIZING AND DESIGNATING STAFF TO

EXECUTE OTHER TRUST-RELATED DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, City pension costs are expected to dramatically increase to potentially unsustainable levels; and
WHEREAS, limited options are available to the City to address its growing pension liability; and
WHEREAS, establishment of a pension trust will play an important role in the City’s fiscal sustainability, including allowing the City to accumulate funds to reduce the City’s unfunded pension liability and mitigate the impact of fluctuations in future pension costs; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2018, the City Council approved a resolution adopting an irrevocable supplemental Section 115 pension trust agreement and authorizing execution of an agreement with PFM Asset Management LLC and other related documents required to establish the trust and receive trust administration and trust asset investment services on behalf of the City; and
WHEREAS, the trust agreement and related documents approved by the Council have not been executed and the pension trust has not been established; and WHEREAS, the previous trustee of the pension trust, Wells Fargo, NA, was replaced by Principal Bank, following the acquisition of the Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement and Trust business in July 2019 by Principal Financial Group, Inc., of which Principal Bank is a wholly owned subsidiary; and
WHEREAS, updates of the pension trust agreement and related documents approved by Council are necessary to change the name of the trustee of the pension trust from Wells Fargo, NA, to Principal Bank and incorporate other changes into the agreements and documents which are non-substantive and/or inure to the benefit of the City, including reduction of the rates of compensation for trust administration services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Salinas that the Council:

1. approves the updated Adoption Agreement For The Post-Employment Benefits Trust between the City and PFM Assets Management LLC (“PFM”);

2. approves the updated Trust Administrative Services Agreement between the City and PFM; and
2 3. authorizes the City Manager, Director of Finance, and Assistant Finance Director to execute the agreements and other documents required to establish a pension trust and receive trust administration and trust asset investment services on behalf of the City.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-184, Version: 1
Modification to the Classification - Salary Schedule and Workforce Allocation Adjustment Approve a Resolution modifying the Classification - Salary Schedule to include the classifications of Inspection Services Manager, Property/Evidence Supervisor, Senior Property/Evidence Technician and Property/Evidence Technician; and approve a workforce adjustment for the Community Development Department to include two additional Community Outreach Assistants (limited term), one position replaces a previously authorized Administrative Aide (limited term).

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 4/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 12, 2022
DEPARTMENT: HUMAN RESOURCES
FROM: Marina Horta-Gallegos, Human Resources Director
TITLE: MODIFICATION TO THE CLASSIFICATION – SALARY

SCHEDULE AND WORKFORCE ALLOCATION ADJUSTMENT
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution modifying the Classification – Salary Schedule to reflect the addition of an Inspection Services Manager and Property/Evidence Supervisor and retitling the existing Evidence Technician classifications to Property/Evidence Technician and Senior Property/Evidence Technician. Lastly, the Community Development Department requests the addition of one Community Outreach Assistant (limited term) and to replace an approved Administrative Aide (limited term) with a Community Outreach Assistant (limited term) and adjustment of the workforce accordingly.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Resolution modifying the Classification – Salary Schedule to reflect an Inspection Services Manager, Property/Evidence Supervisor, Senior Property/Evidence Technician, and Property/Evidence Technician.

Additionally, staff recommends a workforce adjustment that includes two Community Outreach Assistants (limited term). One of these positions will replace a recently approved Administrative Aide (limited term) in the Housing Division of Community Development.

BACKGROUND:

The Inspection Services Manager and Property/Evidence Supervisor positions were approved through the FY 21-22 budget process. The retitling of the Evidence Technicians classifications provide consistency in position titling within the class series. All positions are currently vacant.

Additionally, the Community Development Department seeks to add an additional Community Outreach Assistant (limited term) to the Permit Services workforce. This position would be Position
Step 1
Hourly
Step 1
Monthly
Step 2
Hourly
Step 2
Monthly
Step 3
Hourly
Step 3
Monthly
Step 4
Hourly
Step 4
Monthly
Step 5
Hourly
Step 5
Monthly
Step 6
Hourly
Step 6
Monthly
Inspection Services Manager 51.6694 8,956 54.2581 9,405 56.9644 9,874 59.8162 10,368 62.8132 10,888 65.9486 11,431 Property/Evidence Supervisor 27.3578 4,742 28.7250 4,979 30.3115 5,254 31.8289 5,517 33.4211 5,793 35.0943 6,083 Property/Evidence Technician 22.5372 3,906 23.6614 4,101 24.8441 4,306 26.0845 4,521 27.3896 4,748 28.7596 4,985 Senior Property/Evidence Technician 24.5984 4,264 25.8260 4,477 27.1183 4,701 28.4752 4,936 29.8968 5,182 31.3892 5,441 Page | 2
responsible for coordinating customer interface at the Permit Center, including conducting improvement surveys, assisting in the creation of workshops and information about permitting and housing services. This position will be a key liaison in helping improve customer services and access to Permit Services. The Department also seeks to replace a newly approved Administrative Aide (limited term) with a Community Outreach Assistant (limited term) that will be assigned to the Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP).

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The proposed action meets the Effective and Responsive Government Council goal.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Human Resources Department coordinated with the Police and Community Development Departments in this effort.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The Inspection Services Manager and Property/Evidence Supervisor positions are budgeted. No additional fiscal impact is anticipated. The Community Outreach Assistant will be funded out of the Permit Center Enterprise Fund and the Community Outreach Assistant assigned to the Housing Division will be funded through ERAP grant funds.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Page | 3
RESOLUTION NO. _________ (N.C.S.)

RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFICATION TO THE

CLASSIFICATION - SALARY SCHEDULE AND WORKFORCE ALLOCATION

ADJUSTMENT
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALINAS that the ClassificationSalary Schedule previously adopted by the City Council by Resolution is hereby amended to include the classifications of Inspection Services Manager, Property/Evidence Supervisor, Senior Property/Evidence Technician and Property/Evidence Technician. The workforce for the Community Development Department is adjusted to include two additional Community Outreach Assistants (limited term), one position replaces a previously authorized Administrative Aide (limited term).

PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN: APPROVED:
____________________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-185, Version: 1
Essential Worker Premium Pay
Approve a Resolution to approve a one-time premium payment of two thousand dollars ($2,000) per eligible employee in recognition and appreciation for performing essential work during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the interest of retention.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 4/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
_________________________________________________________________________________ DATE: April 12, 2022
Department: HUMAN RESOURCES
FROM: Marina Horta-Gallegos, Human Resources Director
SUBJECT: ESSENTIAL WORKER PREMIUM PAY
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution to approve a one-time premium payment of two thousand dollars ($2,000) per eligible employee in recognition and appreciation for performing essential work during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the interest of retention.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve a Resolution approving a one-time payment of two thousand dollars ($2,000) per eligible employee for essential work performed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND:

In March 2020, the County of Monterey issued a proclamation of a local emergency directing, among other things, that all non-essential functions within the County be cancelled. The City Manager activated the Emergency Operations Center and declared a local emergency pursuant to the Salinas Municipal Code and Salinas City Council Resolution No. 21805 (N.C.S.).

In March 2020, the City of Salinas took the following actions, among others:
 Closed City Hall and all other facilities open to the public  Closed libraries, recreation centers, parks, and playgrounds  Moved Council and Commission meetings to an online platform  Cancelled private events in City facilities
 Cancelled all public events
 Transitioned some City services to online platforms
Staff pivoted from these cancelled activities to providing emergency response, including operating the City’s Emergency Operations Center, supporting community groups and organizations with the distribution of food and personal protective supplies and services, including community vaccination clinics.

Staff across the City adapted to constant and rapidly changing circumstances and continued to provide services in person and remotely. City staff have provided crucial and vital services throughout the pandemic, including but not limited to COVID-19 enforcement, continued maintenance of streets, sidewalks, parks, library services, online youth activities, food distribution, online permitting, and recruitment, among others.

All regular City employees employed as of March 17, 2022, who remain employed by the City on the date that the premium pay is to be paid (May 11, 2022), are eligible for the one-time only premium payment of two thousand dollars ($2,000), subject to agreement of any applicable bargaining unit.

City employees electing to opt out of the one-time premium payment will be provided a process to do so.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (SEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The proposed action meets the Effective and Responsive Government Council goal.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Human Resources Department coordinated this effort with Administration and Finance Departments.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The approximate total cost of the premium payment is $1,040,000. There are sufficient funds available in the General Fund to cover this appropriation.

These payments would not qualify as special compensation and therefore would not be pensionable income subject to California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS).

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. _________ (N.C.S.)

RESOLUTION APPROVING ESSENTIAL WORKER PAY
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALINAS that in recognition and appreciation of essential work during the COVID-19 pandemic, and in the interest of retention, eligible regular City employees employed as of March 17, 2022, who remain employed by the City on the date that the premium pay is to be paid (May 11, 2022), are approved to receive a one-time only, nonpensionable, lump-sum payment of two thousand dollars ($2,000), payable in the pay period following Council approval.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN: APPROVED:
____________________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

Salinas City CouncilApril 12, 2022

Salinas City Council
April 12, 2022