Agenda Packet — Salinas City Council, April 26, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

Tuesday, April 26, 2022
4:00 PM
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas, CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org

SALINAS ROTUNDA
City Council
Mayor Kimbley Craig
Councilmembers:

Carla Viviana González, District 1 - Tony Barrera, District 2 Steve McShane, District 3 - Orlando Osornio, District 4 Christie Cromeenes, District 5 - Anthony Rocha, District 6 Steven S. Carrigan, City Manager
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
City Clerk’s Office: (831) 758-7381
Meeting Agenda - Final

April 26, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda - Final

PUBLIC NOTICE
This meeting is being conducted consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The public may view the meeting on television and/or online and may participate in-person in the Council Chamber.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

PROCLAMATION / COMMENDATION
National Fair Housing Month, April 2022
Casey Bittner, Salinas Youth

PUBLIC COMMENT PROCEDURES
If you wish to make a general public comment or comment on a specific agenda item, you are encouraged to attended the City Council meeting in person. Public comment may also be submitted via email at [email protected] and will be entered into the record.

PUBLIC COMMENT TIME RESTRICTIONS
Public comments generally are limited to two minutes per speaker; the Mayor may further limit the time for public comments depending on the agenda schedule.

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Receive public communications on items that are not on the agenda and that are in the City of Salinas’ subject matter jurisdiction. Comments on Consent, Consideration, and Closed session items should be held until the items are reached. The public may request that the legislative body consider adding an item for consideration on a future agenda. The public may comment on scheduled agenda items, including closed session items, as they are considered.

PRESENTATION
Councilmember comments on presentations are generally limited to three minutes.

Monterey-Salinas Transit

PUBLIC HEARINGS
ID#22-137 City Development Impact Fees Annual Adjustment Recommendation: Approve a Resolution increasing City development impact fees by 8% effective July1, 2022.

CONTINUED FROM APRIL 12, 2022

Page 2 ends

April 26, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda - Final
ID#22-143 Fiscal Year 2023 City-wide Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing adjustments and additions to the City-Wide Schedule of Fees and Service Charges effective July 1, 2022.

CONTINUED FROM APRIL 12, 2022
ID#22-208 Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002; An Ordinance Amending Various Sections of Chapter 37 of The Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to Allow a School District or Community College District to Acquire, Construct, Rehabilitate, or Preserve Affordable Housing Consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016
Recommendation: Consider finding Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002 (ZCA 2022-002) categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 and adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to allow a school district or community college district to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staff or public consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016.

ID#22-204 Ordinance Adding Sections to Chapter 27 of the Salinas Municipal Code Pertaining to Military Equipment
Recommendation: Adopt an Ordinance adding sections to Chapter 27 of the Salinas Municipal Code pertaining to Military Equipment Funding, Acquisition, and Use as required by Assembly Bill 481.

CONSIDERATION
ID#22-227 Financial Policies Amendments & Reserve Balance Recommendations Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the amendment of City of Salinas Financial Policies, Reserve Policies, Operating Budget Policies, and establish the various appropriation reserve balances.

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
ID#22-202 Fireworks Enforcement Plan
Recommendation: No action required. This report presents the Fireworks Enforcement Plan as required by the Salinas Municipal Code.

CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under Consent Agenda may be enacted by one motion unless a member of the Council or the public requests discussion or a separate vote.

ID#22-228 Minutes
Recommendation: Approve minutes of April 12, 2022.

ID#22-226 Financial Claims
Recommendation: Approve financial claims report.

ID#22-165 Acceptance of Completed Job Orders Under the On-Call Job Order Contract

Page 3 ends

April 26, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda - Final
for Sidewalk Improvements; CIP 9720
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution to accept the following job orders under the On-Call Job Order Contract for Sidewalk Improvements, CIP 9720, for maintenance and responsibility. 1) San Felipe St JOC Sidewalk Repair and ADA Pedestrian Ramp Installation, COS-2020-9216-01; 2) E Alvin Dr JOC Tree Removal, COS-2020-9720-01; 3) John St JOC Sidewalk Repair and ADA Pedestrian Ramp Installation, COS-2020-9720-02; 4) Monte Bella JOC Street Sweeping Sign Installation, COS-2020-9120-01; and 5) Summit/Hilltop JOC Sidewalk Repair and ADA Pedestrian Ramp Installation, COS-2020-9720-03.

ID#22-186 North Davis Road Emergency Guardrail Repairs
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing a transfer of $30,000.00 2511 SB1 Road Maintenance funds from CIP 9081 Signing and Striping Improvements to CIP 9074 North Davis Road Guardrail Improvements.

ID#22-192 Amendments to Agreements for Professional Services with CSG Consultants, Inc. and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendments to the Professional Service Agreements for plan review, permitting and inspection with CSG Consultants, Inc. and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. and increase the total compensation amount not to exceed $1,150,000.

ID#22-205 Direct Purchase of Police Equipment
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the direct purchase of four 40MM Multi Launchers and accessories for a total cost not to exceed $16,278.46
ID#22-206 Direct Purchase of Apex Officer Training Simulator System Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the direct purchase of the Apex Officer Pro Training Simulator Suite with hardware upgrade for a total cost not to exceed $67,500.

ID#22-207 California Interagency Council on Homelessness Family Homelessness Challenge Grant
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution approving the submission of a grant application for the Family Homelessness Challenge Grant, Round 1 to the California Interagency Council on Homelessness (Cal ICH) in the amount of $5.5 million dollars and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all required Agreements and other necessary documents to allow acceptance of an award and the implementation of the proposed project.

ID#22-216 Agreement with SCI Consulting Group for Cannabis Tax Assessment Services
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a final Agreement with SCI Consulting Group with a not to exceed compensation amount of up to $150,000 to provide Commercial Cannabis Tax Assessment Services.

COUNCILMEMBERS’ REPORTS, APPOINTMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Receive communication from Councilmembers on reports, appointments and future agenda items. Councilmember comments are generally limited to three minutes.

Page 4 ends

April 26, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda - Final

CLOSED SESSION
Receive public communications from the audience on Closed session items.

The City Council will recess to closed session pursuant to:

ID#22-217 a. Pending Litigation - California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding Santa Rita Union School District, et al. v. City of Salinas, et al., Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 20CV000242.
b. Pending Litigation - California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding Alisal Union School District, et al. v.

City of Salinas, et al., Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 20CV003402.

ADJOURNMENT
_____________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

AGENDA MATERIAL / ADDENDUM
Any addendums will be posted within 72 hours of regular meetings or 24 hours of special meetings and in accordance with Californian Government Code Section 54954.2, unless otherwise allowed under the Brown Act. City Council agenda item reports may be viewed at the Salinas City Clerk’s Office, 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, and are posted on the City’s website at www.cityofsalinas.org via the hyperlinks provided on the agenda. The City Council may take action that is different than the proposed action reflected on the agenda.

Disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, may be requested by any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting. Requests should be referred to the City Clerk’s Office At 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, 758-7381, as soon as possible but by no later than 5 p.m. of the last business day prior to the meeting. Hearing impaired or TTY/TDD text telephone users may contact the city by dialing 711 for the California Relay Service (CRS) or by telephoning any other service providers’ CRS telephone number.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
This agenda was posted on Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at the City Clerk’s Office, in the Council Rotunda, and the City's website.

Meetings are streamed live at https://salinas.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx and televised live on Channel 25 at 4 p.m. on the date of the regularly scheduled meeting and will be broadcast throughout the day on the Wednesday, Friday, Saturday and Monday following the meeting. For the most up-to-the-minute Broadcast Schedule for The Salinas Channel on Comcast 25, please visit or subscribe to our Google Calendar located at http://tinyurl.com/salinas25. Recent City Council meetings may also be viewed on the Salinas Channel on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/thesalinaschannel.

Page 5 ends

April 26, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda - Final

Page 6 ends

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-137, Version: 1
City Development Impact Fees Annual Adjustment
Approve a Resolution increasing City development impact fees by 8% effective July1, 2022.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/20/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: April 26, 2022
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, DIRECTOR

BY: ADRIANA ROBLES, CITY ENGINEER

LYNN MAU, PUBLIC WORKS ASSISTANT
TITLE: CITY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution increasing City Development Impact Fees by 8% effective July 1, 2022.

RECOMMENDATION:

Hold a public hearing on the proposal to increase City development impact fees and approve a Resolution adjusting the City development impact fees by 8% effective July 1, 2022.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

City Council is requested to approve a Resolution adjusting the City development impact fees by 8% which will become effective July 1, 2022. The increase is based on the Engineering News Record (ENR) construction cost index (CCI) increase over the last year , which is consistent with the fee ordinance (Salinas Municipal Code Chapter 9, Article V).

BACKGROUND:

The City imposes fees on development to fund improvements to capital infrastructure and facilities required to accommodate and service ongoing development (Development Impact Fees).

Appropriately adjusted Development Impact Fees are a benefit to the community and to Developers alike. The public benefits by being able to improve or expand facilities as necessary to accommodate growth. Developers benefit by being able to mitigate certain impacts caused by their project on a fair share basis. No developer is required to solely mitigate a large impact caused by cumulative development. In other words, t here is no single developer to construct a major interchange project, build a new fire station, or upgrade a major sewer trunk main. Developers are also able to mitigate many impacts of their project identified through the CEQA, without lengthy and expensive stud ies. A fee program that is not appropriately adjusted, does not allow for th e proper mitigation of impact due to growth.

Page | 2
Article V, Section 9 -40 through 9 -50 of the Salinas City Code, defines the scope of these fees.

Section 9-42(b) of the Code allows Development Impact Fees to be adjusted annually to account for the fluctuation in construction costs. The industry standard for determining the fluctuations in construction costs is the Engineering News Record (ENR). The “construction cost index” (CCI) as published by the ENR is based on a combination of labor rates and material costs, which are most reflective of construction costs averaged among 20 major metropolitan areas around the United States. Code Section 9-42(b) specifically states “The development impact fee levels may be changed in accordance with the percentage change in the ENR index from January 1 to January 1 of each preceding year, but in no case shall the indexing increase or decrease in development impact fees allowed by this section fee exceed that shown in the ENR index. ” Attached to this report is a copy of the ENR Construction Economics summary for January, which provides background of how the index increased 8% between January 1, 2021 to January 1, 2022.

Exhibit A lists the current and proposed development fee schedules for impacts to City infrastructure, including parks, street trees, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, and traffic. Exhibit B lists the current and proposed development fee schedules for impacts to public facilities, such as fire, police, library, and recreation, and impacts to park facilities.

PUBLIC OUTREACH:

Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce
On March 10, 2022, City staff provided the Development Impact Fee Schedule and City-Wide Fee Schedule to the Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce (Chamber). On April 13, 2022, City staff met with the Government Relations Committee (GRC). The GRC will be requesting a modification of the recommended increase in Development Impact Fees to a maximum of 4%. The GRC is also requesting that a policy is established “locking in” fees to the time a building permit application is submitted.

The City Attorney’s office is reviewing the requests. Development Impact Fees are a method which allows developers to mitigate their CEQA requirements. If an increase, less than the market requires is al lowed there may be a question of whether CEQA requirements have been met by developments.

Salinas United Business Association (SUBA)
On April 18, 2022, City staff met with the SUBA board of directors to introduce the proposed Development Impact Fee annual increase. The information was received by the board of directors and questions were answered by staff. No requests were made by the SUBA board of the directors.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15378 and 15061(b)(3).

Page | 3
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Updating Development Impact fees to match the fluctuating cost of construction is consistent with the Council Goals of “Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability”, “Public Safety” and “Effective and Culturally Responsive Government” by investing in existing facilities and infrastructure, reducing City expenditures to address impacts due to growth, and by providing adequate funding to additional need for policing and emergency medical services due to growth.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Public Works staff has consulted with Administration, Finance and Legal Departments to develop the recommendation herein. Should the City Council approve the recommendation, Public Works will continue to collaborate with these departments, along with Community Development.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Increasing fees proportionate with the ENR construction cost index allows revenues to keep pace with construction cost inflation to minimize or eliminate the impact on the General Fund . As a consideration of the possible impacts COVID-19 had on our community, Council did not increase Development Impact Fees for the fiscal year 2019-2020. Fee increases for the past five years (F.Y. 2016-2017 – 2020-2021) have been 3.9%, 3.3%. 3%, 0%, 2.1%, respectively.

An evaluation of the adequacy of the Development Impact Fees for public infrastructure and traffic development impact fees will be undertaken concurrently with the General Plan update to ensure the fees are adequately covering the costs. The Public Facilities Impact Fee Nexus Study developed by Wildan Financial Services in 2020 provided an update to public facilities and park fees.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
ENR Construction Economics Summary
Exhibit A – Public Infrastructure Fee Schedule
Exhibit B1 – Public Facilities Fee Schedule
Exhibit B2 – Public Facilities Fee Schedule for Residential Development Exhibit C – Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for Development Impact Fees

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO.__________________ (N.C.S.)

RESOLUTION INCREASING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT

FEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD

CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX

WHEREAS, Section 9-42 (b) of the Salinas City Code regarding development impact fees allows the development fees to be adjusted annually with the percentage change in accordance with the ENR Construction Cost Index from January 1 to January 1 of the preceding year; and

WHEREAS, the ENR Construction Cost Index increased 8% during the period from January 1, 2021 to January 1, 2022; and

WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was properly noticed and held on April 26, 2022, pursuant to Government Code 66017 and public comment received;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
(a) The development fees established in Section 9-41 (a) of Article V, are set as follows:

Public Infrastructure Fee Schedule

Street Tree Fee: $389.00 per tree, one tree per sixty feet of street frontage.

Storm Sewer Trunk Line Fee: $646.00 per bedroom;
$1,307.00 per mobile home space;
$8,211.00 per acre (commercial and industrial);
$6,548.00 per acre (schools)

Sanitary Sewer Trunk Line Fee: $603.00 per bedroom;
$1,186.00 per mobile home space;
commercial, industrial, and schools:
$1,995.00 per enclosed building area (includes the
first 4,000 sq. ft. of building area and 20 fixture units) plus $4.95 per 100 sq. ft. over 4,000 sq. ft.;
plus $21.10 per fixture unit over 20 units.

Traffic Fee: $430.00 per daily trip (citywide);
(Adjusted TFO update, January 19, 2010 $622.00 per daily trip (Future Growth Areas); Resolution No. 19802)

Public Facilities Fee Schedule

Library Fee: $794.00 per unit
(Monte Bella/Williams Ranch)

Fire Protection Services Fee: $305.00 per unit
(Monte Bella/Williams Ranch)

Page 2 of 3 ends

Commercial
Fire Impact Fee: $590.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area

Commercial
Police Impact Fee: $785.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area

Industrial
Fire Impact Fee: $134.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area

Industrial
Police Impact Fee: $524.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area

Park Impact Fee: $11,336.00 per single family unit
(West Area Specific Plan) $ 9,650.00 per multifamily unit

Park Impact Fee: $12,554.00 per single family unit
(Central Area Specific Plan) $10,687.00 per multifamily unit

Citywide Public Facilities Fee Schedule for Residential Development

Dwelling Square
Footage Fire Police Library Recreation Park Park (Quimby) SFD Fee Schedule
4000 sf+
3000 sf - 3999 sf $ 388.00 $ 2,145.00 $ 1,526.00 $ 849.00 $ 7,457.00 $ 8,677.00 2500 sf - 2999 sf $ 374.00 $ 2,063.00 $ 1,468.00 $ 816.00 $ 7,172.00 $ 8,344.00 2000 sf - 2499 sf $ 356.00 $ 1,970.00 $ 1,402.00 $ 780.00 $ 6,852.00 $ 7,970.00 1500 sf - 1999 sf $ 343.00 $ 1,899.00 $ 1,351.00 $ 752.00 $ 6,601.00 $ 7,680.00 1000 sf - 1499 sf $ 316.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 1,245.00 $ 692.00 $ 6,084.00 $ 7,078.00 750 sf - 999 sf $ 257.00 $ 1,421.00 $ 1,011.00 $ 563.00 $ 4,942.00 $ 5,750.00 500 sf - 749 sf $ 211.00 $ 1,164.00 $ 828.00 $ 461.00 $ 4,050.00 $ 4,712.00 < 500 sf $ 183.00 $ 1,011.00 $ 719.00 $ 400.00 $ 3,514.00 $ 4,089.00

Page 3 of 3 ends

Dwelling Square
Footage Fire Police Library Recreation Park Park (Quimby) Senior Unit Fee Schedule
4000 sf+
3000 sf - 3999 sf $ 241.00 $ 1,328.00 $ 945.00 $ 526.00 $ 4,621.00 $ 5,376.00 2500 sf - 2999 sf $ 231.00 $ 1,278.00 $ 909.00 $ 505.00 $ 4,442.00 $ 5,169.00 2000 sf - 2499 sf $ 221.00 $ 1,221.00 $ 868.00 $ 483.00 $ 4,247.00 $ 4,940.00 1500 sf - 1999 sf $ 213.00 $ 1,175.00 $ 836.00 $ 465.00 $ 4,086.00 $ 4,753.00 1000 sf - 1499 sf $ 195.00 $ 1,082.00 $ 770.00 $ 429.00 $ 3,765.00 $ 4,379.00 750 sf - 999 sf $ 160.00 $ 882.00 $ 627.00 $ 349.00 $ 3,068.00 $ 3,570.00 500 sf - 749 sf $ 131.00 $ 724.00 $ 515.00 $ 285.00 $ 2,515.00 $ 2,927.00 < 500 sf $ 113.00 $ 626.00 $ 445.00 $ 247.00 $ 2,176.00 $ 2,533.00

(b) The above subject fees will become effective July 1, 2022.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day, of April 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
____________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

+8.0
%
CCI
+13.9
%
BCI
+1.0%
BCI
+0.6%
CCI

20.0 15.0

10.0 25.0

30.0 35.0
per/thousand

INDEX VALUE

ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX

15.0 10.0

5.0 20.0

25.0 30.0
per/thousand

INDEX VALUE

2.8 1.4

0.0 4.2

5.6 7.0
% CHANGE1.2

1.1 0

1.3 1.4

1.5 % CHANGE

ANNUAL BUILDING COST INDEX
MONTHLY BUILDING COST % CHANGEMONTHLY CONSTRUCTION COST % CHANGE JAN.’21 MAR. MAY SEPT. NOV. JAN.’22JULY
JAN.’21 MAR. MAY SEPT. NOV. JAN.’22JULY
JAN.’21 MAR. MAY SEPT. NOV. JAN.’22JULY
JAN.’21 MAR. MAY SEPT. NOV. JAN.’22JULY
Inflation’s Pulse Year-to-year and monthly percent changes for ENR’s cost indexes Cost Index Review
SOURCE: ENR

INFLATION

ANNUAL ESCALATION FOR

COMMON LABOR REACHED

1.4% IN JANUARY,

WHILE SKILLED LABOR
EXPERIENCED A 2.6%

ESCALATION IN
THE SAME PERIOD.
+

1.3 %
Common
Labor Index

CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SKILLED WAGES COMMON WAGES
2020 Dec. 11625.95 1082.33 6445.14 954.00 10743.67 1053.78 24037.06 1160.17 2021 Jan. 11627.94 1082.51 6459.83 956.17 10775.90 1057.04 24037.06 1160.17 Feb. 11698.80 1089.11 6493.19 961.11 10797.45 1058.78 24157.25 1165.88 Mar. 11749.75 1093.85 6545.22 968.81 10800.69 1059.05 24157.25 1165.88 Apr. 11849.31 1103.12 6612.50 978.77 10805.01 1059.49 24253.88 1170.25 May 11989.91 1116.21 6754.51 999.79 10805.01 1059.49 24253.88 1170.25 June 12112.05 1127.58 6876.96 1017.91 10815.82 1060.41 24256.31 1170.40 July 12237.69 1139.28 7006.95 1037.15 10826.64 1061.48 24256.31 1170.40 Aug. 12463.13 1160.26 7201.88 1066.01 10848.29 1063.55 24353.34 1175.33 Sept. 12464.55 1160.40 7214.29 1067.84 10880.83 1066.67 24355.78 1175.39 Oct. 12464.94 1160.43 7244.90 1072.38 10978.76 1075.78 24355.78 1175.39 Nov. 12467.32 1160.65 7255.67 1073.97 11000.72 1078.06 24355.78 1175.39 Dec. 12481.82 1162.00 7289.50 1078.98 11055.72 1083.53 24355.78 1175.39 2022 Jan. 12555.55 1168.87 7359.09 1089.28 11055.72 1083.53 24365.52 1175.83 1913 1967 1913 1967 1913 1967 1913 1967BASE YEAR
ENR’s 20-city average cost indexes, wages and material prices. Historical data for ENR’s 20 cities can be found at ENR.com/economics Construction
Cost Index
ANNUAL

INFLATION RATE
1913=100 INDEX VALUE MONTH YEAR
CONSTRUCTION COST 12555.55 +0.6% +8.0%
COMMON LABOR 24365.52 0.0% +1.4%
WAGE $/HR. 46.82 0.0% +1.4%
The Construction Cost Index’s annual escalation rose
8%, while the monthly component rose 0.6%.
+8.0%
JAN. 2022
Building
Cost Index
ANNUAL

INFLATION RATE
1913=100 INDEX VALUE MONTH YEAR
BUILDING COST 7359.09 +1.0% +13.9%
SKILLED LABOR 11055.72 0.0% +2.6%
WAGE $/HR. 60.99 0.0% +2.6%
The Building Cost Index was up 13.9% on an annual
basis, while the monthly component increased 1%.
+13.9%
JAN. 2022
Materials
Cost Index

MONTHLY

INFLATION RATE
1913=100 INDEX VALUE MONTH YEAR
MATERIALS COST 5073.87 +2.2% +33.7%
CEMENT $/TON 151.44 –0.5% +3.1%
STEEL $/CWT 79.47 +3.8% +41.2%
LUMBER $/MBF 949.70 –0.3% +26.9%
The MCI rose 2.2% since last month, while the
annual escalation rate increased 33.7%.
+2.2%
JAN. 2022

CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS
0110_CE_WK1.indd 10110_CE_WK1.indd 1 1/5/22 11:22 AM1/5/22 11:22 AM

EXHIBIT A
Public Infrastructure Fee Schedule

PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE

Street Tree Fee: $389.00 per tree, one tree per sixty $360.00 per tree, one tree per feet of street frontage. sixty feet of street frontage.

Storm Sewer
Trunk Line Fee: $646.00 per bedroom or $ 1,307.00 per $598.00 per bedroom or $1,210.00 mobile home; Commercial and Indus- per mobile home; Commercial t rial - $8,211.00 per acre; Schools- and Industrial - $7,603.00 per acre $6,548.00 per acre. Schools - $6,063.00 per acre.

Sanitary Sewer
Trunk Line Fee: $603.00 per bedroom or $1,186.00 per $558.00 per bedroom or $1,098.00 per mobile home; Commercial, Industrial, mobile home; Commercial, Industrial, and Schools -$1,995.00 per unit (includes and Schools -$1,847.00 per unit (includes the first 4,000 sq. ft. and 20 fixture units) the first 4,000 sq. ft. and 20 fixture units) plus $4.95 per 100 sq. ft. over 4,000 and plus $4.58 per 100 sq. ft. over 4,000 and $21.10 per fixture unit over 20 units. $19.55 per fixture unit over 20 units.

Traffic Fee: $430.00 per daily trip $398.00 per daily trip (within existing City Limits) (within existing City Limits) (adjusted TFO update, January 19, 2010
Resolution No. 19802)

$622.00 per daily trip ` $576.00 per daily trip
(Future Growth Areas) (Future Growth Areas)
(adjusted TFO update, January 19, 2010
Resolution No. 19802)

EXHIBIT B1
Public Facilities Fee Schedule

PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE

Library Fee: $794.00 per re sidential unit $735.00 per re sidential unit (Monte Bella/Williams Ranch)

Fire Protection Services Fee: $305.00 per re sidential unit $282.00 per re sidential unit (Monte Bella/Williams Ranch)

Commercial Fire Impact Fee: $590.00 per 1,000 square feet of $546.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area floor area

Commercial Police Impact Fee: $785.00 per 1,000 square feet of $727.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area floor area

Industrial Fire Impact Fee: $134.00 per 1,000 square feet of $124.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area floor area

Industrial Police Impact Fee: $524.00 per 1,000 square feet of $485.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area floor area

Park Impact Fee: $11,336.00 per single family unit $10,496.00 per single family unit (West Area Specific Plan) $ 9,650.00 per multifamily unit $ 8,935.00 per multifamily unit

Park Impact Fee: $12,554.00 per single family unit $11,624.00 per si ngle family unit (Central Area Specific Plan) $10,687.00 per multifamily unit $ 9,895.00 per multifamily unit

EXHIBIT B2
Public Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
For Residential Development

Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule
Dwelling Square
Footage Fire Police Library Recreation Park Park (Quimby) SFD Fee Schedule
4000 sf+
3000 sf - 3999 sf $ 388.00 $ 2,145.00 $ 1,526.00 $ 849.00 $ 7,457.00 $ 8,677.00 2500 sf - 2999 sf $ 374.00 $ 2,063.00 $ 1,468.00 $ 816.00 $ 7,172.00 $ 8,344.00 2000 sf - 2499 sf $ 356.00 $ 1,970.00 $ 1,402.00 $ 780.00 $ 6,852.00 $ 7,970.00 1500 sf - 1999 sf $ 343.00 $ 1,899.00 $ 1,351.00 $ 752.00 $ 6,601.00 $ 7,680.00 1000 sf - 1499 sf $ 316.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 1,245.00 $ 692.00 $ 6,084.00 $ 7,078.00 750 sf - 999 sf $ 257.00 $ 1,421.00 $ 1,011.00 $ 563.00 $ 4,942.00 $ 5,750.00 500 sf - 749 sf $ 211.00 $ 1,164.00 $ 828.00 $ 461.00 $ 4,050.00 $ 4,712.00 < 500 sf $ 183.00 $ 1,011.00 $ 719.00 $ 400.00 $ 3,514.00 $ 4,089.00

Senior Unit Fee Schedule
4000 sf+
3000 sf - 3999 sf $ 241.00 $ 1,328.00 $ 945.00 $ 526.00 $ 4,621.00 $ 5,376.00 2500 sf - 2999 sf $ 231.00 $ 1,278.00 $ 909.00 $ 505.00 $ 4,442.00 $ 5,169.00 2000 sf - 2499 sf $ 221.00 $ 1,221.00 $ 868.00 $ 483.00 $ 4,247.00 $ 4,940.00 1500 sf - 1999 sf $ 213.00 $ 1,175.00 $ 836.00 $ 465.00 $ 4,086.00 $ 4,753.00 1000 sf - 1499 sf $ 195.00 $ 1,082.00 $ 770.00 $ 429.00 $ 3,765.00 $ 4,379.00 750 sf - 999 sf $ 160.00 $ 882.00 $ 627.00 $ 349.00 $ 3,068.00 $ 3,570.00 500 sf - 749 sf $ 131.00 $ 724.00 $ 515.00 $ 285.00 $ 2,515.00 $ 2,927.00 < 500 sf $ 113.00 $ 626.00 $ 445.00 $ 247.00 $ 2,176.00 $ 2,533.00

CASH BALANCE - Prior Year Report February 28, 2021 $16,700,159.02 Revenues
2301 Sanitary Sewer & Storm Drain $ 157,029.04
2302 Park Playground Fees 46,948.84
2303 Library Impact Fees 41,053.30
2304 Street Tree Fees 7,119.13
2305 Annexation Fees 0.00
2306 Arterial Fees 488,920.32
2307 Fire Protection Fees 75,712.51
2308 Police Fees 139,504.94
2309 Development Fees - WASP Parks 0.00
2310 Development Fees - CASP Parks 0.00
TOTAL REVENUE 956,288.08
TOTAL CASH AVAILABLE $17,656,447.10
Expenditures
2301 Sanitary Sewer & Storm Drain
9008 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update $ 372,570.31
9114 Salinas River Outfall Channel Repairs 0.00
9175 Santa Rita Storm Channel 0.00
9302 East Lake Streets Sewer Repairs 630,000.00
9735 Priority 1 Storm Sewer Lines 81.50
9853 Priority 1 Sewer Lines 0.00
2302 Park Playground Fees
9092 Park Nexus Study 0.00
9346 Natividad Creek Community Park 23,349.71
9379 Sherwood Tennis Center Imp 0.00
9403 Monte Bella Park 0.00
9454 Lower Natividad Creek Park 0.00
2303 Liabrary Impact Fees
9166 New El Gabilan Library 0.00
2306 Arterial Fees
9071 Williams Rd U.D./Street/Streetscape 80,578.07
9112 Natividad/Laurel Intersection 0.00
9128 Williams Road Median Island 79.60
9133 Sun/Market Intersection 0.00
9140 Kern/101 Ramps-Mobray 0.00
9170 Boronda & N Main Intersection 0.00
9171 E Bernal Drive Improvements 0.00
9278 N Main St/Boronda Rd Impvts 17,541.95
9510 E Boronda Rd Traffic Congestion Relief 13,618.77
9662 Traffic Fee Ordinance Update 3,176.07
9893 US 101 Imp through Salinas 360.86
2307 Fire Fees
9527 Fire Safety Gear & Equipment 2,930.79
TOTAL EXPENDITURES (1,144,287.63)
FUND BALANCE - February 28, 2022 $16,512,159.47

CITY OF SALINAS

DEVELOPMENT FEES FUND

STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
MARCH 1, 2021 THRU FEBRUARY 28, 2022
City Development Impact Fee
Annual Adjustment
Recommended City Council Motion:

Approve a Resolution increasing City development impact fees by 8.0% effective July 1, 2022
Adriana Robles, City Engineer
Department of Public Works
April 26, 2022
Background

Development Impact Fees Purpose and Benefits
 Purpose
 Pay proportionate cost of improvements to capital infrastructure and facilities required to accommodate and service a new development.
 No single development must finance a capital improvement project or new public facility.
 Benefits Community and Developers
 Community can improve facilities impacted by growth
 Developers can mitigate impacts on a “Fair Share Basis”  Developers don’t have to do extensive studies to identify impacts.

Development Impact Fees
• Street Tree Fee (often waived) • Park Impact Fee
• Storm Sewer Main Line Fee •Citywide
• Sanitary Sewer Main Line Fee •Central Area (Future Growth Area) • Traffic Fee (TFO) •West Area (Future Growth Area)
• Fire Impact Fee • Library Impact Fee
• Police Impact Fee • Recreation Impact Fee
Per Exhibits A and B
Credit provided for existing use.

No development fees are assessed for additions.

No development fees assessed on ADU.

Commercial/Industrial
Residential
Annual Inflation Adjustment
 Article V, Section 9-42 of City Code:
 9-42 (a) “…fees shall be reviewed on July 1 of each year. …shall be compared to the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index.”  9-42 (b) “…may be changed in accordance with the percentage change in the ENR index”
 ENR index number
 Based on average construction costs among 20 major US metropolitan areas  Factors in average labor rates and material costs
 2021-2022 ENR Construction Cost Index was 8.0%
Fiscal Impact
 Estimate Fund Balance February 28, 2022: $16.5M
Fee Category 2022 Balance Revenues
March 2021 to
Feb. 2022
Expenditures
March 2021 to
Feb. 2022
Sanitary Sewer & Storm Drain $2.6M $157K $1.0M
Parks $1.1M $46K $23K
Library $170K $41K $0
Street Trees $19K $7,119 $0
Traffic $11.3M $488K $115K
Fire $158K $75K $2K
Police $1.0M $139K $0
Total $16.5M $956K $1.1M
Recommendation
 Approve a Resolution to increase City Development Impact Fees by 8.0%, effective July 1, 2022, based on the Engineering News Record construction cost index increase over the last year.
 Not a Project. Project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15378 and 15061(b)(3).

CEQA
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-143, Version: 1
Fiscal Year 2023 City-wide Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Approve a Resolution authorizing adjustments and additions to the City-Wide Schedule of Fees and Service Charges effective July 1, 2022.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/20/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: APRIL 26, 2022
DEPARTMENT: FINANCE
FROM: MARK ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
TITLE: FISCAL YEAR 20 23 CITY-WIDE SCHEDULE OF FEES AND

SERVICE CHARGES

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council approve a resolution authorizing the City-wide Schedule of Fees and Service Charges effective July 1, 2022.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Each year, the City’s fee schedule is reviewed and adjusted by each department, as applicable, to ensure fees and charges keep pace with inflation, and to work toward full recovery of City service costs. The updated Schedule of Fees and Charges will be effective 60 da ys after City Council adoption and will begin Monday, July 1, 2022.

BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution and Chapter 11B of the Salinas Municipal Code, fees for governmental services may be charged to recover all costs reasonably borne in providing all regulation, products, or services. Cost s reasonably borne are defined in City Code Section 11B-3 as a) all applicable direct costs; b) all applicable indirect costs; c) fixed assets recovery expenses (depreciation); d) general overhead; e) departmental overhead; f) debt service costs; and g) costs for necessary public services.

City Code Section 11B - Fee and Service Charge Revenue
Chapter 11B of the Salinas Municipal Code provides for adjustments to existing City fee/service charge revenue based upon increases provided in the Consumers Price Index (CPI) – All Urban Consumers for the San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose areas . Such adjustments are presented to City Council for adoption by resolution.

Page | 2
Study by Willdan Financial Services
In October 2015, City Council adopted an updated Fee Schedule based on a Comprehensive Fee Study prepared by Willdan Financial Services. Willdan analyzed a variety of factors, ultimately quantifying the full cost incurred by the City in providing the respective ser vices. The recommended fee amount was then established to achieve as close to full cost recovery as possible.

A number of factors prevented full cost recovery from being attained for certain fees , including mandated fee amounts, industry averages, and full cost recovery amounts that were either exceedingly high and/or varied greatly from the prior established fee. The resulting adopted fee schedule, effective January 1, 2016, is the basis for which the current CPI increase was calculated.

Consumer Price Index
The Consumers Price Index (CPI) – All Urban Consumers for the San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose areas increased 3.2% in calendar year 2021. Staff, therefore, recommends City fees and service charges be increased 3.2% effective July 1, 2022.

While staff recommends most City fees be increased by 3. 2%, some exceptions exist.

Specifically, forty-six fees are mandated by various regulations, cannot increase, and are identified in the “Notes” column of the attachment. As a result of a joint opera tions agreement, sixty-eight Animal Shelter fees were adjusted to align with Monterey County. Department discretion was considered on a case-by-case basis, resulting in twenty-three fees’ either remaining unchanged or decreasing and are identified in the “Notes” and “Recommended” columns of the attachment. Lastly, six new fees are being proposed and are identified in the narrative below and on the attachment.

Finance Committee Recommendations
At its April 5, 2022 meeting, the Finance Committee recommended a 2.5% increase rather than the 3.2% corresponding to increase in the CPI. Staff will ultimately adjust the fee schedule at the rate determined by City Council.

The Finance Committee also requested City staff seek feedback from the Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce, Salinas United Business Association (SUBA) , and various youth sports groups .

The outreach was conducted as requested with Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce , who recommended that the proposed 8.0% Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index increase should be only 4%. Additionally, City staff will be meeting with SUBA after the date of submittal of this report but prior to the Council meeting. Staff will update the result of SUBA input at the Council meeting. T he Library and Community Services department confirmed that youth sports groups are not subject to these fees, and as such, those groups were not contacted.

Page | 3
Attachment – FY 22-23 City-Wide Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Finance & Administration
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Cannabis
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Planning
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Maintenance
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Public Works
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Four new fees are being proposed , are identified throughout the Public Works section of the attachment and are consistent with hourly staff rate. Six fees did not increase as the department determined the existing amount was sufficient for full cost recovery.

Fire
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Police
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Two new fees are being proposed and are identified in the Police section of the attachment. Both pertain the massage parlors.

Animal Shelter
Fees were adjusted to align with Monterey County per joint operations agreement.

Library
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Three fees were decreased to an amount sufficient for full cost recovery as determined by the department.

Recreation
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Page | 4
Building-Permit Center
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Fourteen fees did not increase as the department determined the existing amount was sufficient for full cost recovery.

Code Enforcement
Recommendation includes a 3.2% CPI increase.

Housing
Recommendation includes an 8.0% Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index increase as stipulated in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

New and increased fees and service charges are an integral part of the City Council’s budget- balancing solutions, as these revenues recover the cost of the services being provided to those provided the service s. Increased annual revenue associated with the recommended fees and service charge adjustments based on the CPI (3. 2%) is estimated to be approximately $100,000.

These fee increases will be included in fiscal year 2023 estimated revenue projections.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
FY 23 City-Wide Schedule of Fees and Service Charges
Fee Schedule Presentation – City Council 4-26-22
RESOLUTION NO. ______ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES

TO RECOVER ALL COSTS REASONABLY BORNE IN PROVIDING ALL

REGULATION PRODUCTS OR SERVICES BY THE CITY OF SALINAS

WHEREAS, on April 12, 2022, the Salinas City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider proposed amendments on cost recovery fees and service charges; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed increases in the current schedule of fees and service charges for cost recover y in providing all regulation, products or services pursuant to Section 11-B of the Salinas Municipal Code; and

WHEREAS, Section 9-42 (b) of the Salinas City Code regarding development impact fees allows the development fees to be adjusted annually with the percentage change in the ENR Index from January 1 to January 1 of the preceding year; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL that the City Council hereby adopts the attached schedule of fees and service charges attached as “FY 22-23 City-Wide Schedule of Fees and Service Charges” , specifically identified in the column entitled “Recommended Fees Effective 7/1/22” and incorporated into this resolution by reference, effective July 1, 2022.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April 2022, by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

______________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:

____________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

CITY OF SALINAS

FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION
6801.50.5446-52.5070 Parking Garage Permits Monterey Street Parking Garage per hour $ 1.25 $ 1.25 Parking rates calculated and approved by Council separately 6801.50.5446-52.5040 Parking Garage Permits Monterey Street Parking Garage per month $ 50.00 $ 50.00 Parking rates calculated and approved by Council separately 6801.50.5446-52.5020 Parking Garage Permits Salinas Street Garage per month $ 40.00 $ 40.00 Parking rates calculated and approved by Council separately 6801.50.5446-52.5010 Parking Lot Permits Parking Lots 5 & 8 per month $ 55.00 $ 55.00 Parking rates calculated and approved by Council separately 6801.50.5446-52.5010/5011 Parking Garage Permits Parking Lot 12 per month $ 40.00 $ 40.00 Parking rates calculated and approved by Council separately 1000.20.2030-52.5030 Finance Garage Sale Permits $ 13.50 $ 13.93 $ 14.00 1000.20.2034-56.2010 Finance Bus License Application Fees per application $ 5.75 $ 5.93 $ 6.00 1000.20.2030-56.8040 Finance TEFRA Hearing Fee (Conduit Bond Issues) per hearing $ 1,358.50 $ 1,401.97 $ 1,402.00 1000.00.0000-56.8020 Finance/Administration COBRA Administration Fee % of premium $ 12.25 $ 12.64 $ 12.75 1000.20.2034-56.2030 Finance Credit Card Convenience Fee Pass-through Pass-through Pass-through fee - 3% of total 1000.00.0000-57.8080 Finance Late Charge for past due A/R-per month 3% per month 3% per month Penalty 1000.40.4130-56.4161 Finance Tobacco Retailer Fee $ 384.00 $ 384.00 Fee charged by Monterey County Fee must match Monterey County ($384.00 amount subject to change to match approved Monterey County fee)
1000.20.2031-56.2020 Returned Check Fees For the first returned check $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Per Civil Code 1719 Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase 1000.20.2031-56.2020 Returned Check Fees For each subsequent returned check $ 35.00 $ 35.00 Plus any additional charges per Civil Code 1719 Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase
1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material Budget or Audit Report per report $ 35.00 $ 36.12 $ 36.00 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material Business License Reports (List of Businesses) per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material Business License Verification per license $ 2.25 $ 2.32 $ 2.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material Duplicate Business License per license $ 2.25 $ 2.32 $ 2.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material Business License Change per license $ 5.00 $ 5.00 Fee amount per Ordinance, cannot increase 1000.00.0000-56.8060 Copying Fees Copy Per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.00.0000-56.8060 Copying Fees DVD/CD $ 16.00 $ 16.51 $ 16.50 1000.00.0000-56.8060 Copying Fees Fax-per page $3.25 doc &

0.25/page
$3.25 doc &

0.25/page
1000.00.0000-56.8060 Copying Fees Scanning/E-mailing Document-per page $2.20 doc &

0.25/page
$2.20 doc &

0.25/page
1000.00.0000-56.8060 Copying Fees Campaign & Economic Stmts-per page $ 0.10 $ 0.10 FPPC Regulated Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase 1000.12.1120-56.1020 Administration Candidate Filing Fees $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Per Election Code Section 10228 Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase 1000.12.1120-56.1020 Administration Ballot Initiative Refundable Filing Fee $ 200.00 $ 200.00 Not to exceed $200 per Election Code Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase 1000.00.0000-56.8130 Administration Newspaper notice for public hearing initiated by applicant
Actual Newspaper
Publication Cost
Actual Newspaper
Publication Cost
1000.55.6232-56.6090 Rental Fees Rotunda (Or Council Chamber Room) $ 221.00 $ 221.00 Four - eight hours, plus $20.00 per hour if outside of regular business hours Fee amount per Ordinance, cannot increase 1000.55.6232-56.6090 Rental Fees Rotunda (Or Council Chamber Room) $ 111.00 $ 111.00 Less than four hours, plus $20.00 per hour if outside of regular business hours Fee amount per Ordinance, cannot increase 1000.00.0000-56.8120 Legal Special Events Insurance Application Fee per event $ 30.50 $ 31.48 $ 31.50

CANNABIS
1000.30.3462-56.8010 Cannabis Fees Administrative Fees Actual Cost + City Admin
Actual Cost + City
Admin
1000.00.0000-50.2081 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Business License Gross Receipts Gross Receipts 1000.30.3462-52.8015 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Business Admin Permit $ 410.00 $ 423.12 $ 423.00 1000.30.3462-56.8035 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Monitoring Fee (CDD) $ 2,257.50 $ 2,329.74 $ 2,329.75 1000.30.3462-56.8010 Cannabis Fees Administrative Fees
Actual Cost + CDD
Cost
Actual Cost + CDD
Cost
1000.30.3462-52.1205 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Permit-New Application $ 3,223.25 $ 3,326.39 $ 3,326.50 1000.30.3462-52.1206 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Permit-Amendment Major $ 2,633.00 $ 2,717.26 $ 2,717.25 1000.30.3462-52.1207 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Permit-Amendment Minor $ 867.00 $ 894.74 $ 894.75 1000.30.3462-52.1208 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Permit-Appeal $ 811.00 $ 836.95 $ 837.00 1000.30.3462-52.1209 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Permit-Renewal $ 1,479.25 $ 1,526.59 $ 1,526.50 1000.30.3462-56.8010 Cannabis Fees Administrative Fees $ 225.75 $ 232.97 $ 233.00 1000.14.1400-56.8035 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Monitoring Fee (City Attorney) $ 740.50 $ 764.20 $ 764.25 1000.40.4110-56.1141 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Work Permit Fee-Application $ 177.75 $ 183.44 $ 183.50 1000.40.4110-56.1141 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Work Permit Fee-Renewal $ 142.75 $ 147.32 $ 147.25 1000.40.4110-56.1141 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Work Permit Fee-Transfer $ 142.75 $ 147.32 $ 147.25 1000.40.4110-56.8035 Cannabis Fees Cannabis Monitoring Fee (Police) annually $ 8,478.75 $ 8,750.07 $ 8,750.00 PLANNING (Technology Surcharge is not included in the Fee Table) 1000.30.3462-56.3020 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Parcel Map $ 2,830.25 $ 2,920.82 $ 2,920.75 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Administrative $ 2,264.25 $ 2,336.71 $ 2,336.75 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Amendment Administrative $ 1,698.25 $ 1,752.59 $ 1,752.50 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Residential Design Review- Administrative
$ 849.00 $ 876.17 $ 876.25 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Minor Exception-Administrative $ 849.00 $ 876.17 $ 521.94 Per Council Resolution No. 22196 1/25

CITY OF SALINAS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES
July 1, 2022
NWS GL REVENUE ACCOUNT NEW Fee Group Title Unit Current Fee CPI Adjustment
(3.2%)
Recommended Fee
Effective 7/1/22 Notes
Recommended Fee varies from 3.2% increase - Explanation on Council Report
1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Plumbing in Accessory Structure- Administrative $ 226.25 $ 233.49 $ 233.50 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Live Entertainment/On-Sale Alcohol- Administrative $ 1,358.50 $ 1,401.97 $ 1,402.00 1000.30.3462-56.3190 Variance Fees Variance - Administrative $ 2,264.25 $ 2,336.71 $ 2,336.75 1000.30.3462-56.3100 Planned Unit Development Minor Modification $ 905.50 $ 934.48 $ 934.50 1000.30.3462-56.3210 Site Plan Review-per review On-Sale Alcohol Use $ 1,132.00 $ 1,168.22 $ 1,168.25 1000.30.3462-56.3210 Site Plan Review-per review Mural Review $ 339.75 $ 350.62 $ 350.50 1000.30.3462-56.3210 Site Plan Review-per review Minor Modifications $ 849.00 $ 876.17 $ 876.25 1000.30.3462-56.3210 Site Plan Review-per review Parking Reduction Review $ 905.50 $ 934.48 $ 934.50 1000.30.3462-56.3210 Site Plan Review-per review Alternative Means of Compliance Review $ 566.00 $ 584.11 $ 584.00 1000.30.3462-56.3210 Site Plan Review-per review (Residential) Multi-Family 10+ units $ 1,880.00 $ 1,940.16 $ 1,940.25 1000.30.3462-56.3210 Site Plan Review-per review
(Commercial/Industrial) Commercial/Industrial 5,000+ s.f. $ 2,590.25 $ 2,673.14 $ 2,673.25 1000.30.3462-56.3020 Miscellaneous Planning Fees
Resubdivision Review Fees - Lot line
adjustment, Lot consolidation, Certificate of
Compliance
$ 2,590.25 $ 2,673.14 $ 2,673.25 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Minor Modification $ 905.50 $ 934.48 $ 934.50 1000.30.3462-56.3090 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Preliminary Project Review $ 905.50 $ 934.48 $ 934.50 1000.30.3462-56.3120 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Architectural Review $ 566.00 $ 584.11 $ 584.00 1000.30.3462-56.3040 Specific Plan Application Minor Modification $ 905.50 $ 934.48 $ 934.50 1000.30.3462-56.3170 Master Sign Plans-per review Master Sign Plans-Minor (<10 tenants) $ 566.00 $ 584.11 $ 584.00 1000.30.3462-56.3170 Master Sign Plans-per review Master Sign Plans-Major (10+ tenants) $ 905.50 $ 934.48 $ 934.50 1000.30.3462-56.3170 Master Sign Plans-per review Amendment $ 339.75 $ 350.62 $ 350.50 1000.30.3462-56.3210 Site Plan Review-per review Multi-Family 2-9 units $ 1,166.25 $ 1,203.57 $ 1,203.50 1000.30.3462-56.3210 Site Plan Review-per review Commercial/Industrial 0-4,999 s.f. $ 1,880.00 $ 1,940.16 $ 1,940.25 1000.30.3462-56.3070 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Planning Decision Appeal $ 802.50 $ 828.18 $ 828.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material Specific Plan per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material Specific Plan Final EIR per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material General Plan Update-Final per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material General Plan EIR-Final per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material General Plan-Existing Conditions Report per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material General Plan-Executive Summary per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material Subdivision Ordinance per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.12.1120-56.8030 Sale of Printed Material Zoning Code with Binder per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.30.3351-56.8100 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Map Sales Actual Cost Actual Cost 1000.00.0000-57.8050 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Misc-Fed Express Shipping No Fee No Fee 1000.00.0000-56.8060 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Copying Fees-per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.30.3462-56.3140 Miscellaneous Planning Fees CEQA - Environmental Impact Report Cost + 20% Cost + 20% 5203.00.0000-56.3050 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Planning Commission Interpretation-Single Family $ 396.25 $ 408.93 $ 409.00 1000.30.3462-56.3070 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Planning Decision Appeal-Single Family $ 396.25 $ 408.93 $ 409.00 1000.30.3462-56.3180 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Technical Assistance Fee Actual Cost Actual Cost 1000.30.3462-56.3160 Temporary Use of Land Permit Uses up to one year $ 302.00 $ 311.66 $ 311.75 1000.30.3462-56.3220 Planning Inspection Fee-per inspection Multi-Family 2-5 Units 2-9 Units $ 285.25 $ 294.38 $ 294.50 1000.30.3462-56.3220 Planning Inspection Fee-per inspection Commercial/Industrial 0-4,999 sq ft $ 285.25 $ 294.38 $ 294.50 1000.30.3462-56.3220 Planning Inspection Fee-per inspection Multi-Family 6-10 Units 10 + $ 352.00 $ 363.26 $ 363.25 1000.30.3462-56.3220 Planning Inspection Fee-per inspection Commercial/Industrial 5,000-+ sq ft $ 352.00 $ 363.26 $ 363.25 1000.30.3462-56.3160 Temporary Use of Land Permit Tax Exempt Organization No Fee No Fee 1000.30.3462-56.3290 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Landscape/Deferred Completion Agreement Deposit $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3160 Temporary Use of Land Permit Single Business/Temporary Sign $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3160 Temporary Use of Land Permit Shopping Center $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3160 Temporary Use of Land Permit Uses up to one year $ 302.00 $ 311.66 $ 311.75 1000.30.3462-56.3160 Temporary Use of Land Permit Seasonal Use (Christmas Trees/Pumpkins) $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3270 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Home Occupation Permit (HOP) $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3290 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Large Family Day Care Permit $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3290 Miscellaneous Planning Fees ABC/DMV Compliance or Interpretation $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3290 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Landscape Plan Review $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3170 Sign Review & Permits Sign Permit $ 302.00 $ 311.66 $ 311.75 1000.30.3462-56.3250 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Time Extensions of Permits $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3290 Other Planning Fees Zoning Information Letter $ 302.00 $ 311.66 $ 311.75 1000.30.3462-56.3240 Building Permit Review - per review Building Permit Review $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3290 Photometric Lighting Plan Review Photometric Lighting Plan $ 302.00 $ 311.66 $ 311.75 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit Parking Reduction Review $ 302.00 $ 311.66 $ 311.75 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit Alternative Compliance Review $ 302.00 $ 311.66 $ 311.75 1000.30.3462-56.3290 Other Planning Fees CEQA Categorical Exemption $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.30.3462-56.3290 Other Planning Fees Letter of public convenience or necessity $ 302.00 $ 311.66 $ 311.75 5203.00.0000-56.3050 Miscellaneous Planning Fees Planning Commission Interpretation $ 2,264.25 $ 2,336.71 $ 2,336.75 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit $ 5,726.00 $ 5,909.23 $ 5,909.25 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Amendment $ 3,962.00 $ 4,088.78 $ 4,088.75 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Residential Design Review $ 2,264.25 $ 2,336.71 $ 2,336.75 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Minor Exception $ 2,264.25 $ 2,336.71 $ 2,336.75 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Plumbing in Accessory Structure $ 602.25 $ 621.52 $ 621.50 1000.30.3462-56.3080 Conditional Use Permit CUP-Live Entertainment/On-Sale Alcohol $ 1,698.25 $ 1,752.59 $ 1,752.50 1000.30.3462-56.3130 Miscellaneous Planning Fees CEQA -Negative Declaration/ Mitigated Negative Declaration $ 1,698.25 $ 1,752.59 $ 1,752.50 2/25

CITY OF SALINAS

MAINTENANCE
Varies Maintenance On-site work requested Actual Cost Actual Cost Based on fully burdened rates of positions involved
PUBLIC WORKS (Technology Surcharge is not included in the Fee Table) 1000.50.5115-56.3240 Building Permits New address or address change per bldg/floor $ 72.00 $ 74.30 $ 74.25 6500.50.5443-56.5080 Commercial Industrial Compliance NPDES Permit Violations per day per event $ 1,000.00 $ 1,032.00 $ 1,032.00 6500.50.5443-56.5080 Commercial/Industrial Compliance Inspections hourly $ 263.00 $ 271.42 $ 263.00 Do not increase per department, charged hourly 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Curb & Gutter LF <50 LF, $74.75 $ 77.14 <50 LF, $77.25 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Curb & Gutter LF >50LF, $74.75 + $9.75/50LF
>50LF, $77.25
+ $10.00/50LF
1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Driveway Approach (Commercial) each $ 266.50 $ 275.03 $ 275.00 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Driveway Approach (Residential) each $ 194.75 $ 200.98 $ 201.00 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Drop Box (Dumpster) each $ 38.25 $ 39.47 $ 39.50 Charged weekly 1000.50.5239-63.4900 Encroachment Permits Landscaping - Parkway/Median Landscaping SF $50.00/200SF $ 51.60 $51.50/200SF 1000.50.5239-63.4900 Encroachment Permits Landscaping - Tree Installation each $50.00/tree $ 51.60 $51.50/tree 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Lane Closure LF <50LF = $74.75 $ 77.14 <50LF = $77.25 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Lane Closure LF >50LF + $74.75 + $28.50/50LF
>50LF + $77.25 +
$29.50/50LF
1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Minor Encroachment each $ 346.25 $ 357.33 $ 357.25 Applies in Local or Collector Streets; includes
minor sidewalk/road improvements,
landscaping, road closures
1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Parking Space Closure each $ 45.50 $ 46.96 $ 47.00 Charged monthly 6801.50.5446-57.8050 Encroachment Permits Parking Space Closure Downtown & Alisal each $ 75.50 $ 77.92 $ 78.00 Charged monthly 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Paving - Roadway SF $349.00/200SF $ 360.17 $360.25/200SF 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Sidewalk & Parkway Paving SF <200SF, $74.75 $ 77.14 <200SF, $77.25 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Sidewalk & Parkway Paving SF >200SF, $74.75 + $41.00/200SF
>200SF, $77.25
+ $42.25/200SF
1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Pedestrian (ADA) Ramp each $ 74.75 $ 77.14 $ 77.25 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Public Improvements each $702.25 + 1.0%
public
improvements
$ 724.67
$724.75 + 1.0%
public
improvements
1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Sanitary Sewer Main LF <30LF, $111.00 $ 114.55 <30LF, $114.50 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Sanitary Sewer Main LF >30LF, $111.00 + $51.75/30LF
>30LF, $114.50
+ $53.50/30LF
1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Sewer Connection (Tap) each $ 222.00 $ 229.10 $ 229.00 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Encroachment Permits Sidewalk Closure LF $ 50.00/200LF $ 51.60 $ 51.50/200LF 1000.50.5236-57.8050 Encroachment Permits Signal Modification each $ 500.00 $ 516.00 $ 516.00 3/25

CITY OF SALINAS

4.5% up to
$260,941.50 + 3%
over $260,941.50

4.5% up to
$269,291.75 + 3%
over $269,291.75
Assessed every 2 years
1000.50.5115-56.5020 Major Subdivisions Plan Check Fee
$696.75 + 1.0% up
to $100,000.00 +

0.5% over
$100,000.00
$ 719.05
$719.00 + 1.0% up
to $100,000.00 +

0.5% over
$100,000.00
1000.50.5115-56.5010 Map Check Fee Review of easements, plats or legal descriptions hourly $ 180.50 $ 186.28 $ 186.25 1000.50.5115-56.5010 Map Check Fees Major & Minor Subdivisions $1,255.00 + $144.00/lot
$1,295.25 +
$148.50/lot
1000.50.5115-56.5010 Map Check Fees Condominiums $1,230.00 + $117.75/lot
$1,269.25 +
$121.50/lot
1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Construction Inspections hourly $ 143.50 $ 148.09 $ 148.00 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Construction Inspections - Follow-up inspections hourly $ 103.00 $ 106.30 $ 106.25 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Final Map - (Final Review) - 20+ lots each $11,510.50 +
$99.25
> 20 lots
$11,878.75 +
$102.50
> 20 lots
1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Final Map - (Final Review) - less than 20 lots each $11,510.50 -
$196.75
< 20 lots
$11,878.75 -
$203.00
< 20 lots
1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Post-Construction Inspections hourly $ 124.25 $ 128.23 $ 128.25 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NEW NPDES and SWDS Fees O&M Inspection, per SCM each $ 65.25 Charge initial inspection with permit fees.

Charge 30 min per SCM. Fee consistent with staff hourly stormwater inspection rate 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Review of Maintenance Declaration each $ 143.75 $ 148.35 $ 148.25 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Specific Plan hourly $147.25/hr $ 151.96 $152.00/hr 4/25

CITY OF SALINAS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES
July 1, 2022
NWS GL REVENUE ACCOUNT NEW Fee Group Title Unit Current Fee CPI Adjustment
(3.2%)
Recommended Fee
Effective 7/1/22 Notes
Recommended Fee varies from 3.2% increase - Explanation on Council Report
1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Stormwater Quality (SWQ) Permit each $ 97.00 $ 100.10 $ 100.00 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees SWPPP Review Fee hourly $ 146.00 $ 150.67 $ 150.75 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Tentative Map (Prelim Review) - 20+ lots each $11,510.50 +
$99.25/lot
> 20 lots
$11,878.75 +
$102.50
> 20 lots
1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Tentative Map (Prelim Review) - less than 20 lots each
$11,510.50 -
$196.75/lot
< 20 lots
$11,878.75 -
$203.00
< 20 lots
1000.50.5115-56.5080 NEW NPDES and SWDS Fees SWDS Exception Review each $ 148.25 Charge to review exception requests Fee consistent with 1 hour or staff review time 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NEW NPDES and SWDS Fees Tier 1 SWCP Review hourly $ 148.25 Charge to review Tier 1 projects Fee consistent with staff hourly review rate 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Tier 2 SWCP Review (Final) each $ 1,500.00 $ 1,548.00 $ 1,548.00 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Tier 2 SWCP Review (Preliminary) each $ 1,000.00 $ 1,032.00 $ 1,032.00 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Tier 3 SWCP Review (Final) each $ 3,825.25 $ 3,947.66 $ 3,947.75 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Tier 3 SWCP Review (Preliminary) each $ 2,663.50 $ 2,748.73 $ 2,748.75 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Tier 4 SWCP Review (Final) each $ 4,483.75 $ 4,627.23 $ 4,627.25 1000.50.5115-56.5080 NPDES and SWDS Fees Tier 4 SWCP Review (Preliminary) each $ 3,795.50 $ 3,916.96 $ 3,917.00 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Abandonment of Right of Way/Easements each $ 1,444.50 $ 1,490.72 $ 1,490.75 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Aerial Photographs (Color) each $ 1.50 $ 1.55 $ 1.50 8.5"x11" 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Aerial Photographs (Color) each $ 2.25 $ 2.32 $ 2.25 8.5"x14" 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Aerial Photographs (Color) each $ 2.75 $ 2.84 $ 2.75 11"x17" 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Aerial Photographs (Color) each $ 6.00 $ 6.19 $ 6.25 18"x24" 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Aerial Photographs (Color) each $ 18.25 $ 18.83 $ 18.75 24"x36" and larger 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Details Package (Detail Drawing Package) each $ 34.00 $ 35.09 $ 35.00 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Flood Zone Requests FEMA Report and Map each $ 45.25 $ 46.70 $ 46.75 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Flood Zone Requests FEMA Report Only each $ 27.25 $ 28.12 $ 28.00 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Grant Deed, Deed Prep, Map Prep each $ 574.00 $ 592.37 $ 592.25 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Kip Print (Cut Sheet, 24"x36") each $ 3.50 $ 3.61 $ 3.50 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Map Sales-GIS each $ 48.75 $ 50.31 $ 50.25 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Microfilm or Microfiche Printout (18"x24") each $ 2.25 $ 2.32 $ 2.25 Maps and Documents 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Plans-Color Print SF $ 9.00 $ 9.29 $ 9.25 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Plans-Large Format Black and White Print SF $ 1.00 $ 1.03 $ 1.00 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Property Vacated By City each $ 870.25 $ 898.10 $ 898.00 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Record of Survey each Consultant Cost Consultant Cost 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Sewer Bases Maps each $ 65.75 $ 67.85 $ 67.75 1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees
Special convenience traffic/parking requests
(other restricted parking zones and traffic
request that benefits applicant only)
hourly Time and
materials Time and materials
1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Special GIS Request, Research, Analytics, and Mapping
hourly Time and
materials Time and materials
1000.50.5120-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Standard Specifications each $ 54.25 $ 55.99 $ 56.00 1000.50.5122-56.5100 Other Public Works Fees Traffic Control Plans hourly $ 236.75 $ 244.33 $ 244.25 1000.12.1355-56.8037 Small Wireless Facility Fees Annual Monitoring Fee each $ 270.00 $ 270.00 cannot increase due to FCC Regulations Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase 1000.12.1355-56.8037 Small Wireless Facility Fees Encroachment Permit Appeal each $ 366.00 $ 377.71 $ 377.75 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Small Wireless Facility Fees Encroachment Permit Application each $ 355.75 $ 367.13 $ 367.25 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Small Wireless Facility Fees Encroachment Permit Inspection Fee each $ 760.50 $ 784.84 $ 784.75 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Small Wireless Facility Fees Reservation Extension each $ 145.00 $ 149.64 $ 149.75 1000.50.5122-56.5060 Special Curb Marking Fees One-time set-up per location per request $ 844.50 $ 871.52 $ 871.50 1000.50.5122-56.5060 Special Curb Marking Fees Per Location each $ 294.25 $ 303.67 $ 303.75 1000.50.5122-56.5100 Special Events Street Closure Review each $ 236.75 $ 244.33 $ 244.25 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Special Permits Newspaper rack - Annual Fee SF $72.00 $ 74.30 $ 74.25 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Special Permits Non-construction activities (banners, lights, scaffolding)
each $ 175.00 $ 180.60 $ 180.50 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Special Permits Permanent Encroachment each $ 322.00 $ 332.30 $ 332.25 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Special Permits Permanent Encroachment - Annual Fee each $ 106.50 $ 109.91 $ 110.00 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Special Permits Sidewalk Café each $ 319.50 $ 329.72 $ 329.75 1000.50.5115-52.3050 Special Permits Sidewalk Café - Annual Inspection each $ 106.50 $ 109.91 $ 110.00 5203.00.0000-55.3013 TrakIt Technology System TrakIt Technology System $ 0.05 $ 0.05 $ 0.05 1000.50.5236-56.5065 Underground Service Alert (USA) USA Service Traffic Signals per call $ 179.25 $ 184.99 $ 185.00 1000.50.5235-56.5065 Underground Service Alert (USA) Marking Streets Division
Encroachment Project (Remarking Facilities)
$69.25 first 50 LF;
$0.70 each
additional LF
$ 71.47 $71.50 first 50 LF
1000.50.5235-56.5065 Underground Service Alert (USA) Marking Streets Division
Encroachment Project (Remarking Facilities)
$69.25 first 50 LF;
$0.70 each
additional LF
$ 0.72 $0.70 each
additional LF Fees assessed by Maintenance
1000.50.5235-56.5065 Underground Service Alert (USA) Marking Streets Division
Utilities Agencies (Emergency Repair)
$69.25 first 50 LF;
$0.70 each
additional LF
$ 71.47 $71.50 first 50 LF
1000.50.5235-56.5065 Underground Service Alert (USA) Marking Streets Division
Utilities Agencies (Emergency Repair)
$69.25 first 50 LF;
$0.70 each
additional LF
$ 0.72 $0.70 each
additional LF Fees assessed by Maintenance
1000.50.5235-56.5065 Underground Service Alert (USA) Marking Streets Division
Encroachment Projects Utilities
Locator Fee (Streetlights)
$69.25 first 50 LF;
$0.70 each
additional LF
$ 71.47 $71.50 first 50 LF
1000.50.5235-56.5065 Underground Service Alert (USA) Marking Streets Division
Encroachment Projects Utilities
Locator Fee (Streetlights)
$69.25 first 50 LF;
$0.70 each
additional LF
$ 0.72 $0.70 each
additional LF Fees assessed by Maintenance
5/25

CITY OF SALINAS

Includes but limited to: DSA, OSHPD, CCL,
County Building.
per hour $ 161.00 $ 166.15 $ 166.25 1000.45.4570-56.4505 Miscellaneous Fees-Emergency Response Reimbursement
Reimbursement from responsible individuals
for the expenses of any emergency response
and/or enforcement action by the City of
Salinas to protect the public from fire or
hazardous substances and situations. (1) In
accordance with the Health and Safety Code
Section 13000 et seq., an individual who acts
negligently or in violation of the law and
thereby requires the jurisdiction to provide an
emergency response to a danger posed by a
fire or hazardous substance shall be liable for
reimbursement to the agency for the costs
incurred.
per hour $ 676.00 $ 697.63 $ 697.75 min. 2 hours 1000.45.4570-56.4505 Miscellaneous Fees-Emergency Response Reimbursement
Reimbursement from responsible individuals
for the expenses of any emergency response
and/or enforcement action by the City of
Salinas to protect the public from fire or
hazardous substances and situations. (1) In
accordance with Government Code Sections
53150 through 53158, any individual who is
under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or
any drug or the combined influence of an
alcoholic beverage or any drug, and whose
negligent operation of a motor vehicle, boat or
vessel or civil aircraft caused by that influence
proximately causes any incident and thereby
requires the agency to provide an emergency
response shall reimburse the agency for the
cost incurred.
per hour $ 676.00 $ 697.63 $ 697.75 min 2 hours 5203.00.0000-55.4083
Permit Fee- In-Building Public Safety
Radio Coverage per California Fire Code
(CFC)
CFC in-building public safety communications
radio coverage - Commercial new construction
/ tenant Improvements
per sq. ft. $0.70/sq ft. $0.75/sq ft.
1000.45.4530-56.4430
Inspection Fees- For All Inspections
Required By The California Fire Code -
Business & Assembly Occupancies
On Site Inspection of existing occupancies and
operations requiring a fire permit and/or
business license (CFC)
Annual-
per total
square
footage
0 - 1,000 $188.00 /
1,001 - 5,000
$266.25 / 5,001-
10,000 $333.50 /
10,001-12,000
$400.50 / 12,001-
50,000 $467.50 /
50,001 and >
$533.50
0 - 1,000 $194.00 /
1,001 - 5,000
$274.75 / 5,001-
10,000 $344.25 /
10,001-12,000
$413.25 / 12,001-
50,000 $482.50 /
50,001 and >
$550 50
1st reinspection included if violations are
corrected. 2nd & subsequent reinspections
@ 50% of original inspection.
1000.45.4530-56.4430
Inspection Fees- For All Inspections
Required By The California Fire Code -
Special Event Permits
On Site Inspection of special event
occupancies and operations requiring a fire
permit. (CFC) Open Flame Cooking. (Annual)
Annual for single
vendor @ any
location @ 1 time
$1,878.75 / Single
Vendor @ up to 4
locations @ 1 time
$2,819.50 / Annual
for single fixed
location (Campus,
Church, Vehicle
Dealers, etc.)
$1 878 75
Annual for single
vendor @ any
location @ 1 time
$1,938.75 / Single
Vendor @ up to 4
locations @ 1 time
$2,909.75 / Annual
for single fixed
location (Campus,
Church, Vehicle
Dealers, etc.)
$1 938 75
POLICE
1000.00.0000-56.8060 Front Desk Fees Copying Fees per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 1000.40.4220-56.4020 Front Desk Fees Special Police Service Fees-Repossessed Vehicle $ 27.25 $ 28.12 $ 28.00 penalty 1000.40.4130-56.4030 Front Desk Fees Police Reports: Other than Accidents $ 22.50 $ 23.22 $ 23.25 8806.81.8132-57.8230 Front Desk Fees Plus: Sales Tax (9.25%) $ 2.08 $ 2.15 $ 2.15 Calculated tax rate 1000.40.4130-56.4030 Front Desk Fees Police Reports: Accidents $ 13.50 $ 13.93 $ 14.00 7/25

CITY OF SALINAS

ANIMAL SHELTER
1000.40.4170-52.4010 Dog Licenses, 1-6 months Unaltered $ 39.75 $ 41.02 $ 25.00 Dog Licenses To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Dog Licenses, 1-6 months Altered $ 14.25 $ 14.71 $ 15.00 Dog Licenses To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Dog Licenses, 7-12 months Unaltered $ 73.75 $ 76.11 $ 54.00 Dog Licenses To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Dog Licenses, 7-12 months Altered $ 20.75 $ 21.41 $ 20.00 Dog Licenses To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Dog Licenses, 13-24 months Unaltered $ 90.00 $ 92.88 $ 67.00 Dog Licenses To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Dog Licenses, 13-24 months Altered $ 26.50 $ 27.35 $ 30.00 Dog Licenses To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Dog Licenses, 25-36 months Unaltered $ 118.75 $ 122.55 $ 87.00 Dog Licenses To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Dog Licenses, 25-36 months Altered $ 32.00 $ 33.02 $ 40.00 Dog Licenses To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Dog Licenses, Citizens 60 years + 1-36 months: ALTERED ONLY $ 11.00 $ 11.35 $ 12.00 Dog Licenses To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Voluntary Cat License, 1-36 months Unaltered $ 17.75 $ 18.32 $ 10.00 Voluntary Cat License To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Voluntary Cat License , 1-36 months Altered $ 8.75 $ 9.03 $ 5.00 Voluntary Cat License To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Late Fee For Failures To Obtain A License Initial $ 35.00 $ 36.12 $ 30.00 penalty To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Other Animal Shelter Services Duplicate Dog Tags $ 9.00 $ 9.29 $ 5.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Other Animal Shelter Services License Transfer Fee $ 11.25 $ 11.61 n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 8801.81.8150-57.8500 Impound Fees 1st Occurrence $ 35.00 $ 35.00 State Law (AB1856) Fine (Cat/Dog unaltered
fine); Regulated by CA Food & Agri Code
30804.07/31751.7
Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase
8801.81.8150-57.8500 Impound Fees 2nd Occurrence $ 50.00 $ 50.00 State Law (AB1856) Fine (Cat/Dog unaltered
fine); Regulated by CA Food & Agri Code
30804.07/31751.7
Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase
8801.81.8150-57.8500 Impound Fees 3rd Occurrence & subsequent $ 100.00 $ 100.00 State Law (AB1856) Fine (Cat/Dog unaltered
fine); Regulated by CA Food & Agri Code
30804.07/31751.7
Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase
8/25

CITY OF SALINAS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES
July 1, 2022
NWS GL REVENUE ACCOUNT NEW Fee Group Title Unit Current Fee CPI Adjustment
(3.2%)
Recommended Fee
Effective 7/1/22 Notes
Recommended Fee varies from 3.2% increase - Explanation on Council Report
1000.40.4170-56.4090 City Impound Fees Dogs, 1st in 1 yr* penalty $ 50.75 $ 52.37 $ 39.00 *1st impound portion fee will be refunded if pet is altered within 30 days of impound. To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 City Impound Fees Dogs, 2nd in 1 yr penalty $ 62.25 $ 64.24 $ 48.00 2nd in 1 yr To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 City Impound Fees Dogs, 3rd in 1 yr penalty $ 96.00 $ 99.07 $ 91.00 3rd in 1 yr To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 City Impound Fees Cats penalty same as dog fees same as dog To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 City Impound Fees Other Animals penalty same as dog fees n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Field Release Back To Owner - One
Time/Year Only Altered $ 34.00 $ 35.09 $ 70.00 Dogs MUST be licensed and cats have
current rabies vaccination and wearing
identification
To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Field Release Back To Owner - One
Time/Year Only Unaltered $ 34.00 $ 35.09 $ 93.00 Dogs MUST be licensed and cats have
current rabies vaccination and wearing
identification
To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Boarding Fee Per Day Dogs $ 18.25 $ 18.83 $ 20.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Boarding Fee Per Day Cats $ 18.25 $ 18.83 $ 20.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Boarding Fee Per Day Quarantine Dogs $ 26.25 $ 27.09 $ 26.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Boarding Fee Per Day Quarantine Cats $ 26.25 $ 27.09 $ 26.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Boarding Fee Per Day Small/Other Animals $ 11.25 $ 11.61 $ 18.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Boarding Fee Per Day Animals unable to be boarded at shelter Cost of service n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Quarantine Fees 10 Day Home $ 68.00 $ 70.18 $ 50.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Quarantine Fees 14 Day Home $ 68.00 $ 70.18 $ 67.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Quarantine Fees 30 Day Home $ 132.25 $ 136.48 $ 85.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Quarantine Fees 180 Day Home $ 197.00 $ 203.30 $ 104.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Adoption Fees Administrative Adoption/Processing Fee $ 17.00 $ 17.54 n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Adoption Fees Small Animal Adoption Fee $ 11.25 $ 11.61 $ 75.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Adoption Fees Other Animals each Market Rate plus $11.25 $ 11.61 $ 55.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees (Rabies) Adoption $ 17.00 $ 17.54 $ 18.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees (Rabies) RTO $ 22.50 $ 23.22 $ 18.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees Other Vaccination Fee $ 17.00 $ 17.54 n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees Microchip Fee $ 34.00 $ 35.09 $ 20.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees Identification (I.D.) Tag $ 9.00 $ 9.29 n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees FeLV/FIV Test $ 28.25 $ 29.15 $ 26.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees Veterinary Services Provided Cost of Svcs/ Medicines See clinic fees including medicines given To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees Spay/Neuter Surgeries Cost of service See clinic fees To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owner Surrender (O/S) Fee Dog/Cat (one) $ 72.50 $ 74.82 $ 48.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owner Surrender (O/S) Fee Other Animals $ 36.25 $ 37.41 $ 48.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owner Surrender (O/S) Fee Litter With Parent $ 96.00 $ 99.07 $ 59.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owner Surrender (O/S) Fee 2-5 Animals $ 69.00 $ 71.21 $ 59.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owner Surrender (O/S) Fee 6-10 Animals $ 102.00 $ 105.26 $ 70.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owner Surrender (O/S) Fee Over 11 Animals $ 119.00 $ 122.81 $ 81.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owned Animal Pick Up (Officer Transport Fee) Dog/Cat $ 96.00 $ 99.07 n/a Applicable O/S fee would also apply To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owned Animal Pick Up (Officer Transport Fee) Other $ 96.00 $ 99.07 n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owned Animal Pick Up (Officer Transport Fee) Dead Animal (no O/S fee applies) $ 96.00 $ 99.07 n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owner Request Euthanasia - Fee For Service Dog, Small/Medium $ 62.25 $ 64.24 $ 48.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owner Request Euthanasia - Fee For Service Dog, Large/X-Large $ 88.25 $ 91.07 $ 60.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owner Request Euthanasia - Fee For Service Cats/Rabbits $ 43.00 $ 44.38 37/59 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owner Request Euthanasia - Fee For Service Litters (unweaned only) $ 22.50 $ 23.22 $ 48.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owned Animal Emergency Assistance During Business Hours (1 hr min) per hour $ 69.00 $ 71.21 $ 112.00 1 hr. min To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Owned Animal Emergency Assistance After Business Hours (2 hr min) per hour $ 192.25 $ 198.40 $ 149.00 2 hr. min To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 8801.81.8149-57.8490 Spay/Neuter Deposit Dog $ 75.00 $ 75.00 Regulated by 31751.2 (b)(1)-fee no more than $75.00 Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase 8801.81.8149-57.8490 Spay/Neuter Deposit Cat $ 75.00 $ 75.00 Regulated by 31751.2 (b)(1)-fee no more than $75.00 Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase 8801.81.8149-57.8490 Rabies Testing Health Dept. FRA/lab Test $ 160.00 165 /105 per Monterey County Fee amount regulated by mandate, cannot increase 8801.81.8149-57.8490 Rabies Testing Decapitation fee $ 45.25 $ 46.70 80-303 if required To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Abatement/Nuisance Hearing Per Officer hour 1 hour minimum; 20 hour max per hour $ 158.25 $ 163.31 $ 103.00 1 hour minimum; 20 hour max To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Reports And/Or File Copies Document Search $ 39.75 $ 41.02 n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Reports And/Or File Copies Copy Fee per page $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.12 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Other Animal Shelter Services Potentially Dangerous Dog Annual Fee penalty $ 170.00 $ 175.44 $ 300.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-52.4010 Other Animal Shelter Services Vicious Dog Annual Fee penalty $ 283.00 $ 292.06 n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees FeLV Test (only) $ 22.50 $ 23.22 n/a To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees Parvo Test $ 22.50 $ 23.22 $ 42.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees Bordetella $ 8.00 $ 8.26 $ 18.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees Da2PP $ 9.00 $ 9.29 $ 12.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement 1000.40.4170-56.4090 Vaccination Fees FVRCP $ 8.00 $ 8.26 $ 10.00 To align with County fee due to joint operations/agreement

LIBRARY
9/25

CITY OF SALINAS

Reduce to reasonable cost to replace item per department 1000.60.6005-56.6330 Library Services Lost/Damaged items processing fee per item $ 5.25 $ 5.42 $ 5.00 Cost to process replacements for
lost/damaged items (including patron-
provided replacements)
Reduce to reasonable cost to replace item per department 1000.60.6005-56.6300 Other Library Fees Repairable item damage per item $ 5.25 $ 5.42 $ 5.00 Reduce to reasonable cost to replace item per department 1000.60.6005-56.6300 Other Library Fees Library card replacement per card $ 2.00 $ 2.06 $ 2.00 1000.60.6005-56.6300 Other Library Fees Sale of Items*: Ear buds per item $ 1.00 $ 1.03 $ 1.00 1000.60.6005-56.6300 Other Library Fees Library Meeting Room: Application Fee per 12 months $ 35.00 $ 36.12 $ 36.00 Fee waived for current nonprofit/educational program partners
1000.60.6005-56.6300 Other Library Fees Library Meeting Room: After Library Hours Usage Hourly
Actual personnel
costs + Tiered
Hourly fee
Actual personnel
costs + Tiered
Hourly fee
Cost for usage of building after hours
1000.60.6005-56.6300 Other Library Fees Library Meeting Room: Rental Fee Tier 1 Hourly Application fee only
Application fee
only
Tier 1: Nonprofit associations & registered
neighborhood associations
1000.60.6005-56.6300 Other Library Fees Library Meeting Room: Rental Fee Tier 2 Hourly $ 63.75 $ 65.79 $ 65.75 Tier 2: Local or State Government associations (not including City of Salinas)
1000.60.6005-56.6300 Other Library Fees Library Meeting Room: Rental Fee Tier 3 Hourly $ 90.50 $ 93.40 $ 93.50 Tier 3: Private or Commercial usage 1000.60.6005-56.6300 Other Library Fees Deposit for rental clean-up Personnel
Cost as
required
$ 200.00 $ 200.00 Required if meals are to be served, or decorations used Deposit, increasing not applicable

RECREATION
1000.00.0000-56.8090 Administration Parade Permit Fees $ 74.75 $ 77.14 $ 77.25 1000.40.4130-56.4100 Administration Noise Regulation Fees-per event $ 125.50 $ 129.52 $ 129.50 1000.00.0000-56.8120 Special Event Application Fee Special Event Application Fee - Major $ 266.25 $ 274.77 $ 274.75 1000.00.0000-56.8120 Special Event Application Fee Special Event Application Fee - Minor $ 106.50 $ 109.91 $ 110.00 1000.55.6239-56.6080 Sherwood Hall Application Fee $ 335.50 $ 346.24 $ 346.25 1000.55.6243-56.6070 Community Center Rental Fees-Sherwood Hall Rental Rates -Category I City Activities N/C N/C 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees-Sherwood
Hall Education programs by Local Schools
(ADA received or fee charged-teachers,
training, Staff meetings. Fund raising and
Business meetings for Salinas Charities
(California. Revenue and Tax Code 23701
D Local Salinas performing arts
organization focusing on youth
Rental Rates- Category II Day Rate 8:00am-
6:00pm Mon-Thurs $ 585.75 $ 604.49 $ 604.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees-Sherwood
Hall -Education programs by Local Schools
(ADA received or fee charged-teachers,
training, Staff meetings. Fund raising and
Business meetings for Salinas Charities
(California. Revenue and Tax Code 23701
D Local Salinas performing arts
organization focusing on youth
Category II Evening Rate 6:00pm-12:00am
Mon-Thurs $ 585.75 $ 604.49 $ 604.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees-Sherwood
Hall -Education programs by Local Schools
(ADA received or fee charged-teachers,
training, Staff meetings. Fund raising and
Business meetings for Salinas Charities
(California. Revenue and Tax Code 23701
D Local Salinas performing arts
organization focusing on youth
Category II Inclusive Rate 8:00am-12:00am
Mon-Thurs $ 809.50 $ 835.40 $ 835.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees Sherwood
Hall Fund-raising and Business meetings
for Non-Profit (other than Calif. Revenue &
Tax Code 23701 D) Religious - Local
Salinas performing arts organization
focusing on youth
Category II Day 8:00am-6:00pm Rate Fri.-Sun $ 873.25 $ 901.19 $ 901.25 Category II Rental Rates- Day 8:00am- 6:00pm Rate Fri.-Sun
10/25

CITY OF SALINAS

Agencies, Social Events non- Salinas
Groups
Category III Rental Rates Day rate 8:00am-
6:00pm $ 1,065.00 $ 1,099.08 $ 1,099.00 Category III Rental Rates- Day Rate 8:00am- 6:00pm
1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates Sherwood
Hall Category III-Private and Political
Events, Non-Monterey County Govt.

Agencies, Social Events non- Salinas
Groups
Category III Rental Rate - Evening Rate
6:00pm- 12:00am $ 1,065.00 $ 1,099.08 $ 1,099.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates Sherwood
Hall Category III-Private and Political
Events, Non-Monterey County Govt.

Agencies, Social Events non- Salinas
Groups
Category III Rental Rate inclusive Rate $ 1,533.75 $ 1,582.83 $ 1,582.75 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees Sherwood
Hall Commercial Sales and Auction
Salinas and Non-Salinas Organizations
Rental Rates Category III Day 8:00am-6:00pm $ 1,256.75 $ 1,296.97 $ 1,297.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees Sherwood
Hall Commercial Sales and Auction
Salinas and Non-Salinas Organizations
Rental Rates Category III Evening Rate
6:00am-12:00pm $ 1,235.50 $ 1,275.04 $ 1,275.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees Sherwood
Hall Commercial Sales and Auction
Salinas and Non-Salinas Organizations
Rental Rates Category III Inclusive Rate
8:00am-12:00pm $ 1,842.50 $ 1,901.46 $ 1,901.50 1000-55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees Sherwood
Hall Commercial Admission
Category IV Rental Rates Day Rate 8:00am-
6:00pm
$1,043.75 or 12%
of gross $ 1,077.15 $1,077.25 or 12% of
gross
1000.55.6243-56.6070 Community Center Rental Fees Sherwood Hall Commercial Admission
Category IV Rental Rates Evening Rate
6:00pm-12:00am
$1,043.75 or 12%
of gross $ 1,077.15 $1,077.25 or 12% of
gross
1000.55.6243-56.6070 Community Center Rental Fees Sherwood Hall Commercial Admission Category IV Inclusive Rate 8:00am-12:00am $1,448.25 or 12% of gross $ 1,494.59 $1,494.50 or 12% of
gross
11/25

CITY OF SALINAS

Government programs, Private/Political.

Religious, Social Events. Commercial
Sales and Auctions -Salinas Organizations
Category III Day Rate 8:00am- 5:00pm $ 319.50 $ 329.72 $ 329.75 Category III Rental Rates - Day Rate 8:00am- 5:00pm
1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees Santa
Lucia Room Category III Non Monterey Co.

Government programs, Private/Political.

Religious, Social Events
Category III Evening Rate 8:00am-5:00pm $ 319.50 $ 329.72 $ 329.75 Category III Rental Rates - Evening Rate 5:00pm-10:00pm
1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees Santa
Lucia Room Category III Non Monterey Co.

Government programs, Private/Political.

Religious, Social Events
Category III Hourly rate 3 hour minimum $ 71.25 $ 73.53 $ 73.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates Santa
Lucia Rm- Commercial Sales and Auctions
- Salinas Organizations
Category III Rental Rate Day Rate 8:00am-
5:00pm $ 319.50 $ 329.72 $ 329.75 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates Santa
Lucia Rm- Commercial Sales and Auctions
- Salinas Organizations
Category III Rental Rate Evening Rate 5:00pm-
10:00pm $ 319.50 $ 329.72 $ 329.75 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates Santa
Lucia Rm- Commercial Sales and Auctions
- Salinas Organizations
Category III Rental Rate-Hourly Rate- 3 Hour
minimum $ 71.25 $ 73.53 $ 73.50 12/25

CITY OF SALINAS

Government programs for SALINAS
residents,
Gabilan/Fremont Rm Category I Day Rate
8:00am-5:00pm application fee per 6 months $ 36.25 $ 37.41 $ 37.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees- Category I
Gabilan Rooms/Fremont Rm City
Activities, Business meetings for Salinas
non-profit, Education programs for local
schools ( no ADA or Fee), Monterey Co.

Government programs for SALINAS
residents,
Gabilan/Fremont Rm Category I Evening Rate
5:00pm-10:00pm application fee for 6 months $ 36.25 $ 37.41 $ 37.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees- Category I
Gabilan Rooms/Fremont Rm City
Activities, Business meetings for Salinas
non-profit, Education programs for local
schools ( no ADA or Fee), Monterey Co.

Government programs for SALINAS
residents,
Gabilan/Fremont Rm Category I hourly rate 3
hour minimum $ 36.25 $ 37.41 $ 37.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees- Category I
Gabilan Rooms/Fremont Rm City
Activities, Business meetings for Salinas
non-profit, Education programs for local
schools ( no ADA or Fee), Monterey Co.

Government programs for SALINAS
residents,
Non-operating hours Day Rate 8:00am-
6:00pm $ 452.50 $ 466.98 $ 467.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees- Category I
Gabilan Rooms/Fremont Rm City
Activities, Business meetings for Salinas
non-profit, Education programs for local
schools ( no ADA or Fee), Monterey Co.

Government programs for SALINAS
residents,
Non-operating hours Evening Rate 6:00pm-
12:00pm $ 452.50 $ 466.98 $ 467.00 13/25

CITY OF SALINAS

Government programs for SALINAS
residents,
Non-operating hours Inclusive 8:00am-
12:00am $ 798.75 $ 824.31 $ 824.25 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates Category
II Gabilan Rooms/Fremont Room
Education programs by Local Schools
(ADA received or fee charged-no teachers,
training, no Staff meetings). Fund raising
and Business Meetings for Salinas non-
profit, Business Meetings for Non-Salinas -
Non-Profit.

Gabilan/Fremont Rm Category II Rental Rates -
Day Rate 8:00am-5:00pm $ 71.25 $ 73.53 $ 73.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates II Gabilan
Rooms/Fremont Room Education
programs by Local Schools (ADA received
or fee charged-no teachers, training, no
Staff meetings). Fund raising and
Business Meetings for Salinas non-profit,
Business Meetings for Non-Salinas -Non-
Profit.

Gabilan/Fremont Rm Category II Evening Rate
5:00am-10:00pm $ 71.25 $ 73.53 $ 73.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates II Gabilan
Rooms/Fremont Room Education
programs by Local Schools (ADA received
or fee charged-no teachers, training, no
Staff meetings). Fund raising and
Business Meetings for Salinas non-profit,
Business Meetings for Non-Salinas -Non-
Profit.

Gabilan/Fremont Rm Category II Hourly Rate
3 hr. minimum $ 21.25 $ 21.93 $ 22.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates II Gabilan
Rooms/Fremont Room Education
programs by Local Schools (ADA received
or fee charged-no teachers, training, no
Staff meetings). Fund raising and
Business Meetings for Salinas non-profit,
Business Meetings for Non-Salinas -Non-
Profit.

Category II non-Operating Hours Day Rate
8:00am-6:00pm $ 452.50 $ 466.98 $ 467.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates II Gabilan
Room/Fremont Room Education programs
by Local Schools (ADA received or fee
charged-no teachers, training, no Staff
meetings). Fund raising and Business
Meetings for Salinas non-profit, Business
Meetings for Non-Salinas -Non-Profit.

Category II non-Operating hours evening rate
6:00pm-12:00am $ 452.50 $ 466.98 $ 467.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates II Gabilan
Rooms/Fremont Room Education
programs by Local Schools (ADA received
or fee charged-no teachers, training, no
Staff meetings). Fund raising and
Business Meetings for Salinas non-profit,
Business Meetings for Non-Salinas -Non-
Profit.

Category II non-Operating hours Inclusive rate
8:00am-12:00am $ 798.75 $ 824.31 $ 824.25 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees Category
III Gabilan Rooms/Fremont Room Non-
Monterey Co. Government programs,
Private/Political. Religious, Social Events-
Gabilan/Fremont Rm Category II Day Rate
8:00am-5:00pm $ 90.50 $ 93.40 $ 93.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates Category
III Gabilan Rooms/Fremont Room Non-
Monterey Co. Government programs,
Private/Political. Religious, Social Events-
Gabilan/Fremont Rm Category II Evening Rate
5:00pm-10:00pm $ 90.50 $ 93.40 $ 93.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Rates II Gabilan
Rooms/Fremont Room Education
programs by Local Schools (ADA received
or fee charged-no teachers, training, no
Staff meetings). Fund raising and
Business Meetings for Salinas non-profit,
Business Meetings for Non-Salinas -Non-
Profit.

Gabilan/Fremont Rm Category II Hourly Rate 3
hr. minimum $ 26.75 $ 27.61 $ 27.50 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Com Center Rental Fees-Category III
Gabilan Rooms/Fremont Rm Commercial
Sales and Auction Salinas Organizations
Category III Gabilan/Fremont Rm Day Rate
8:00am-5:00pm $ 90.50 $ 93.40 $ 93.50 14/25

CITY OF SALINAS

Category I -Application Fee-Educational
programs for students of local schools. No
ADA or fees charged as per City/School
Business meetings for Salinas non-profit.

Monterey County Govt. programs for SALINAS
Residents
per 6
months
$36.25 application
fee per 6 months $ 37.41 $37.50 application fee per 6 months
1000.55.6232-56.6090 Recreation Facility Center Rental Fees - Category II Education for local Schools ( ADA
or fee) Fund raising for Salinas non-profit
events-Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, United Way,
etc., Business meetings for non-Salinas non-
profit
per hour $63.75-$127.75 $65.75-$131.75
1000.55.6239-56.6100 Recreational Facility Use Fee
Category III Government Programs-non- Mty
City, Religious events, Private/Political events,
fund raising events non-Salinas non-profits,
Agencies outside of Salinas, Social Events
per hour $70.25-$136.25 $72.50-$140.50
15/25

CITY OF SALINAS

Government programs, Private/Political.

Religious, Social Events. Commercial
Sales and Auctions -Salinas Organizations
Category III Rental Rates - Non-Operating
Hours 8:00am-6:00pm $ 452.50 $ 466.98 $ 467.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees-Category
III Santa Lucia Rm. Non Monterey Co.

Government programs, Private/Political.

Religious, Social Events. Commercial
Sales and Auctions -Salinas Organizations
Category III Rental Rates - Non-Operating
Hours 6:00pm-12:00mid. $ 452.50 $ 466.98 $ 467.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees-Category
III Santa Lucia Rm. Non Monterey Co.

Government programs, Private/Political.

Religious, Social Events. Commercial
Sales and Auctions -Salinas Organizations
Category III Rental Rates - Non-Operating
Hours 8:00am-12:00mid. $ 873.25 $ 901.19 $ 901.25 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees-Santa
Lucia Rm- Category III Commercial Sales
and Auctions - Non- Salinas Organizations
Category III Rental Rates - Non-Operating
Hours 8:00am-6:00pm $ 452.50 $ 466.98 $ 467.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees-Santa
Lucia Rm- Category III Commercial Sales
and Auctions - Non- Salinas Organizations
Category III Rental Rates - Non-Operating
Hours 6:00pm-12:00mid. $ 452.50 $ 466.98 $ 467.00 1000.55.6243-56.6070
Community Center Rental Fees-Santa
Lucia Rm- Category III Commercial Sales
and Auctions - Non- Salinas Organizations
Category III Rental Rates - Non-Operating
Hours 8:00am-12:00mid. $ 873.25 $ 901.19 $ 901.25 1000.55.6239-56.6030
Reserved Picnic Area Fees (Sherwood
Park, Hartnell Park, & Natividad Creek
Park)
Bounce House Vendor Fee per year $ 26.75 $ 27.61 $ 27.50 19/25

CITY OF SALINAS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES

PERMIT ENTERPRISE FEE TABLE
July 1, 2022
See Fee Table to Determine Structure of Fees Basic vs Combo

VALUATION TABLE TO DETERMINE BUILDING PERMIT FEE
VALUATION Current Fee CPI Adjustment (3.2%)
Recommended Fee
Effective 7/1/22 Minimum
$1 to $500 $67.00 $69.14 $69.00 *** $69.00
$501 to $2,000 $37.00 $38.18 $38.00 for the first $500 plus $4.50 for each additional $100, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000, minimum OF *** $2,001 to $25,000 $106.00 $109.39 $109.00 for the first $2,000 plus $19.00 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000*** $25,001 to $50,000 $599.00 $618.17 $618.00 for the first $25,000 plus $13.00 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000*** $50,001 to $100,000 $986.00 $1,017.55 $1,018.00 for the first $50,000 plus $8.00 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000*** $100,001 to $500,000 $1,520.00 $1,568.64 $1,569.00 for the first $100,000 plus $7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000*** $500,001 to $1,000,000 $4,938.00 $5,096.02 $5,096.00 for the first $500,000 plus $6.00 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000*** $1,000,001 and up $8,422.00 $8,691.50 $8,692.00 for the first $1,000,000 plus $4.00 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof*** 20/25
Building Valuation Data Table
price per square footage minimum

CITY OF SALINAS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES

PERMIT VALUATION BASELINE
July 1, 2022
Group (2018 International Building Code) IA IB IIA IIB IIIA IIIB IV VA VB EQUIPMENT A-1 Assembly, theaters, with stage 246.61 238.50 232.82 223.18 209.86 203.80 216.12 191.69 184.50 Air Conditioning A-1 Assembly, theaters, without stage 225.65 217.54 211.85 202.22 189.15 183.09 195.16 170.98 163.79 Commercial………….$5 A-2 Assembly, nightclubs 191.96 186.56 182.12 174.70 164.94 160.39 168.64 149.29 144.33 Residential…………..$4 A-2 Assembly, restaurants, bars, banquet halls 190.96 185.56 180.12 173.70 162.94 159.39 167.64 147.29 143.33 REMODELS A-3 Assembly, churches 226.69 218.58 212.89 203.26 191.60 185.54 196.20 173.43 166.24 50% of per sq ft identified A-3 Assembly, general, community halls, libraries, museums 190.63 182.52 175.84 167.20 153.09 148.07 160.14 134.97 128.78 from this list A-4 Assembly, arenas 224.65 216.54 209.85 201.22 187.15 182.09 194.16 168.98 162.79 OVER 3 STORIES B Business 197.81 190.62 184.70 175.70 160.65 154.63 168.95 141.15 134.99 Add 0.5% E Educational 207.77 200.59 194.83 186.43 173.71 164.91 180.01 151.89 147.25 SHELL ONLY F-1 Factory and industrial, moderate hazard 117.60 112.19 105.97 100.84 91.54 87.26 97.61 75.29 70.95 Reduce 20% F-2 Factory and industrial, low hazard 116.60 111.19 105.97 101.84 91.54 86.26 96.96 75.29 69.95 H-1 High Hazard, explosives 109.99 104.58 99.35 94.22 85.14 79.87 89.99 68.89 N.P.

H234 High Hazard 109.99 104.58 99.35 94.22 85.14 79.87 89.99 68.89 63.56 OR SIGNED CONTRACT H-5 HPM 197.81 190.62 184.70 175.70 160.65 154.63 168.95 141.15 134.99 I-1 Institutional, supervised environment 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33 I-2 Institutional, hospitals 330.92 323.73 317.81 308.81 292.72 N.P. 302.06 273.22 N.P. Unfinished Basement (Group R-3 I-2 Institutional, nursing homes 229.68 222.49 216.58 207.57 193.53 N.P. 200.83 174.02 N.P. equals $21 per sq ft I-3 Institutional, restrained 224.86 217.67 211.75 202.75 188.96 181.94 196.00 169.45 161.29 I-4 Institutional, day care facilities 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.60 146.98 142.33 M Mercantile 142.95 137.54 132.11 125.68 115.38 111.83 119.62 99.73 95.77 R-1 Residential, hotels 199.70 192.92 186.99 179.78 164.90 160.43 179.93 148.60 143.96 NP = not permitted R-2 Residential, multiple family 167.27 160.49 154.56 147.35 133.71 129.23 147.50 117.40 112.76 R-3 Residential, one- and two-family 154.28 150.09 146.35 142.65 137.55 133.95 140.30 128.74 121.24 R-4 Residential, care/assisted living facilities 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33 S-1 Storage, moderate hazard 108.99 103.58 97.35 93.22 83.14 78.87 88.99 66.89 62.56 S-2 Storage, low hazard 107.99 102.58 97.35 92.22 83.14 77.87 87.99 66.89 61.56 U Utility, miscellaneous 84.66 79.81 74.65 71.30 64.01 59.80 68.04 50.69 48.30 21/25

CITY OF SALINAS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES

PERMIT CENTER ENTERPRISE FUND
July 1, 2022
(5% Technology Surcharge is not included in the Fee Table) Abbreviated permits may require potential divisional fees that may be associated with the scope of work including but not limited to plan review and copy charges General Plan Maintenance Fee will not apply to abbreviated permits

NWS GL REVENUE ACCOUNT
Payment
Code Current Fee
CPI Adjustment
(3.2%)
Recommended Fee
Effective 7/1/22 Notes
6900.30.3350-52.3040 Electrical
Electrical Permits $ 202.75 ** $ 209.24 $ 209.25 6900.30.3350-52.3010 Mechanical
Mechanical Permits $ 69.75 ** $ 71.98 $ 72.00 6900.30.3350-52.3030 Plumbing
Plumbing Permits $ 69.75 $ 71.98 $ 72.00 Backflow Preventer $ 171.00 $ 176.47 $ 176.50 6900.30.3350-52.3060 Reroof
Residential Re-roofs $ 215.25 $ 222.14 $ 222.25 Commercial Re-roofs under 50k sf $ 381.25 $ 393.45 $ 393.50 Commercial Re-roofs over 50k sf $ 479.75 $ 495.10 $ 495.00 6900.30.3350-52.3070 Demolition Permit $ 165.00 $ 165.00 loaded hourly rate 6900.30.3350-52.3020 Administrative Permits (plus any other req'd division fees) $ 222.75 $ 229.88 $ 222.75 do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-56.3400 Fast Track Permit Fee 33% of the PC 33% of the PC 6900.30.3350-56.3430 City Report $ 67.75 ** $ 69.92 $ 67.75 do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-56.3400 Building Plan Check Fees 90% of the BPF 90% of the BPF 6900.30.3350-56.3400 OSHPD 3 Review 33% of the PC 33% of the PC 6900.30.3350-56.3410 Violation related non-construction permits 2 hours or actual 2 hours or actual 6900.30.3350-56.3400 Supplemental Plan Check (after 2nd PC comments, each re-submittal or OTC check fraction thereof) $ 133.00 HR $ 137.26 $ 137.25 6900.30.3350-56.3400 Abbreviated Plan Check per hour OR 1/4 hour increments $ 133.00 HR $ 137.26 $ 137.25 6900.30.3350-52.3020 Permit Re-Issuance and/or Administrative Processing Charge $57.50 $ 59.34 $ 59.25 6900.30.3350-52.3020 Combination Building Permits (includes Mech, Elec, Plumb) 150% of BPF 150% of BPF 6900.30.3350-52.3020 OSHPD 3 Permit Fee 33% of BPF 33% of BPF 6900.30.3350-56.3410 Special Inspection (SBI) $ 161.00 ** $ 161.00 loaded hourly rate 6900.30.3350-56.3400 Alternative Means of Construction $ 300.00 $ 309.60 $ 300.00 do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-56.3410 Inspections Outside Normal Business Hours (2 hour min) $ 241.50 $ 241.50 loaded 1.5 hourly rate 6900.30.3350-56.3420 Reinspection Fees (under provision Section 305.8) $ 161.00 $ 161.00 loaded hourly rate 6900.30.3350-56.3400 Subdivision Plan Check Fee (or multiple review on same plan) 18% of PC 18% of PC 6900.30.3350-56.8060 Color Copies $ 2.00 $ 2.00 do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-56.8060 Copies $2.10 for 1st copy $2.10 for 1st copy do not increase per dept $0.25 add'l pages $0.25 add'l pages
6900.30.3350-56.3410 Citations see below ** see below 6900.30.3350-56.3410 1st Citation $130.00 $ 130.00 AB 2598 state recommendation 2nd Citation $700.00 $ 700.00 AB 2598 state recommendation 3rd Citation $1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 AB 2598 state recommendation 6900.30.3350-56.3410 Violation of Use per AB 2598 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 AB 2598 state recommendation Temporary Certificate of Occupancy $2,000 TOTAL
6900.30.3350-56.3460 * Admin (Comment-Address) $ 437.00 ** $ 450.98 $ 437.00 do not increase per dept 8801.81.8125-57.8570 * Deposit (Comment-Permit Deposit) $ 1,563.00 $ 1,613.02 $ 1,563.00 do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-56.3460 * TCO Extension Fees per extension request $ 437.00 $ 450.98 $ 437.00 do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-55.3013 TrakIt Technology System 5% 5%
6900.30.3350-56.3400 Air Balance Report $ 126.00 $ 130.03 $ 130.00 6900.30.3350-56.3400 Energy Plan Check Fee (.15% x bldg plan check fee) 15% of PC 15% of PC 6900.30.3350-56.3410 Building Investigation Fee $ 500.00 $ 516.00 $ 500.00 do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-52.3020 Permit Extension / Permit Reinstatement - per request $500.00 each $516.00 each $500.00 each do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-52.3020 Permit Extension & Reinstatement on Abbreviated permits per request $100.00 each $103.25 each $100.00 each do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-56.3400 Solar Plan Check Commercial $ 564.00 $ 564.00 Must match state fees rate 6900.30.3350-52.3020 Solar Permit Fee Commercial $ 867.00 $ 867.00 Must match state fees rate 6900.30.3350-56.3400 Solar Plan Check Residential $ 215.00 $ 215.00 Must match state fees rate 6900.30.3350-52.3020 Solar Permit Fee Residential $ 152.00 $ 152.00 Must match state fees rate 6900.30.3350-52.3020 Duplicate Permit Copy $ 5.00 $ 5.16 $ 5.00 do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-56.3440 Archiving (scanning/microfilm) Fee Large Copies $3.00 each page $3.00 each page do not increase per dept 6900.30.3350-56.3440 Archiving (scanning/microfilm) Fee Small Copies $1.00 each page $1.00 each page do not increase per dept Fee Group
22/25

CITY OF SALINAS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES

NWS GL REVENUE ACCOUNT
Payment
Code Current Fee
CPI Adjustment
(3.2%)
Recommended Fee
Effective 7/1/22 NotesFee Group
** Building Fees are regulated by Govt' Code Section 66016 Also, CA Attorney General Opinion 92-506
"BPF" = Building Permit Fee
23/25

CITY OF SALINAS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES

CODE ENFORCEMENT- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-OTHER FEES
July 1, 2022
(5% Technology Surcharge is not included in the Fee Table)

NWS GL REVENUE ACCOUNT
Payment
Code Fee Group Current Fee
CPI
Adjustment
(3.2%)
Recommended Fee
Effective 7/1/22 Notes
1000.30.3353-56.3450 Special Inspection (SCI) $ 101.50 ** $ 104.75 $ 104.75 1000.30.3353-53.3010 Building & Safety Citations
1st $ 130.00 $ 130.00 AB 2598 state recommendation 2nd $ 700.00 $ 700.00 AB 2598 state recommendation 3rd and subsequent $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 AB 2598 state recommendation Additional violation within two
years of the first violation (if
the property is a commercial
property due to failure by the
owner to remove visible
refuse or failure to prohibit
unauthorized use of the
property)
$ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 AB 2598 state recommendation 1000.30.3353-56.3450 Investigation Fee for Repeat Violations $ 410.50 $ 423.64 $ 423.75 8801.81.8123-57.8110 Weed Abatement Administrative Fee 25% of contract cost 25% of contract cost 1000.30.3353-53.3010 Administrative Citation Penalty 15% 15% 24/25

CITY OF SALINAS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES

HOUSING FEES
July 1, 2022
For-Sale Housing In-Lieu Fees and Rental Housing Impact Fees The fees below are applicable to residential developments subject to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Article 3 of Chapter 17 of the Salinas Municipal Code) which elect to pay for-sale housing in-lieu fees or rental housing impact fees. No fee is required for residential developments that are exempt under Section 2.17.8.

For-Sale Housing In-Lieu Fee: $14.05 per square foot of gross floor area* Rental Impact Fee:** $2.40 per square foot of gross floor area* *"Gross floor area" is as defined in Municipal Code Section 37.10.300 under "Floor area, gross." **If fewer than twelve percent of units in a residential development are affordable to lower income households, the applicant shall be given an impact fee credit equal to the percentage of lower income units provided, divided by 12. (For instance, if 10 percent of the units are affordable to lower income households, the applicant shall receive a credit equal to 10/12 of the rental housing impact fee otherwise required.) Fees shall be paid at the time specified in Municipal Code Section 3.17.14.

For any annual period during which the City Council does not review fees, the fee amounts shall be adjusted once annually based on the percentage increase in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index for San Francisco, California. 25/25
1 Fiscal Year 2023 Annual Update
April 26, 2022
Schedule of Fees and Service Charges
City of Salinas
2 Mark Roberts
Director of Finance
City of Salinas
3 Consumer Price Index (CPI)
& Fee Increase - History
4/26/2022
Fiscal Year CPI Increase Staff Recommendation
Fee Increase (Council
Adoption) Notes
2018 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
2019 3.2% 3.2% 3.2%
2020 3.9% 3.9% 3.9%
2021 3.3% 3.3% 0.0% No increase due to COVID-19
2022 1.7% 3.3% 2.5% 3.3% + 1.7% = 5.0% / 2 years = 2.5% 2023 3.2% 3.2%
4 Discussion
 Outreach to Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce,
SUBA, and Non-Profit Alliance for Monterey County
(confirmed by LCS that youth sports groups are not
subject to fees)
 Finance Committee Meeting – 4/5/22 (2.5%
recommendation)
 City Council Meeting – 4/26/22
4/26/2022
5 Detail by Fee Group – FY23
4/26/2022
Fee Group New Fees
Fees Adjusted
by CPI / ENR
Fees
Unchanged
due to
Mandates
Fees Adjusted
to align with
County
Fees Unchanged or
Decreased per
Department Total
Finance & Administration 0 16 14 0 0 30
Cannabis 0 16 0 0 0 16
Planning 0 98 1 0 0 99
Public Works 4 126 4 0 6 140
Fire 0 35 0 0 0 35
Police 2 39 2 0 0 43
Animal Shelter 0 0 6 68 0 74
Library 0 11 0 0 3 14
Recreation 0 197 0 0 0 197
Building Permit Services 0 57 12 0 14 83
Code Enforcement 0 4 7 0 0 11
Housing 0 2 0 0 0 2
Total 6 601 46 68 23 744
6 Questions?
4/26/2022
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-208, Version: 1
Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002; An Ordinance Amending Various Sections of Chapter 37 of The Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to Allow a School District or Community College District to Acquire, Construct, Rehabilitate, or Preserve Affordable Housing Consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016
Consider finding Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002 (ZCA 2022-002) categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 and adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to allow a school district or community college district to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staff or public consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/20/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: APRIL 26, 2022
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

FROM: MEGAN HUNTER, DIRECTOR

TITLE: ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2022-002; AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 37-10.290 (“E” DEFINITIONS), 37-10.430 (“S” DEFINITIONS), 37-30.60 (RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT), 37 -30.110 (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICTS), 37 -30.160
(RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY DISTRICTS), 37 -30.200
(COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS), 37-30.230 (MIXED USE DISTRICTS), AND 37-30.390 (PUBLIC/SEMIPUBLIC DISTRICT), AND ADDING SECTION 37-50.235 - SCHOOL DISTRICT OR COMMUNITY COLLEGE
DISTRICT HOUSING TO CHAPTER 37 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
(ZONING CODE)

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion finding Zoning Code Amendment 2022 -002 categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15305 and adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to allow a school district or community college district to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staff or public consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council find Zoning Code Ame ndment 2022-002 categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15305 and introduce and adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to allow a school district or community college district to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staff or public consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Salinas Union High School District (SUHSD) approached City staff regarding the possible acquisition of an empty apartment complex to provide affordable housing for teachers and other school employees. Unfortunately, existing regulations restricting large employer housing would not allow the school district to acquire p roperty for this use. As outlined in various plans such as the Salinas Plan and Housing Element, the City has a vested interest in increasing affordable housing. Moreover, the State has passed the Teacher Housing Act of 2016, which allows school Page | 2
districts to facilitate the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of affordable housing at low and moderate rental rates for teachers and employees, local public employees, or the general public.

The State Legislature is in the process of amending this Act to include community college districts.

As a result, staff is recommending that City Council adopt Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA 2022- 002) to eliminate current restrictions on employee housing for a school district or community college district consistent with the Teacher Housing Act 2016. ZCA 2022-002 includes provisions to minimize displacement that could occur should a school district or community college district purchase an existing occupied rental building. Under these circumstances, the school or community college district would be subject to notification and relocation assistance requirements. In addition, the ZCA stipulates that construction and rehabilitation would be subject to the regulations and standards of the underlying zoning district.

BACKGROUND:

Zoning Code Amendment 2022 -002 would amend Sections 37 -10.290 (“E Definitions”), 37 -

30.420 (“S Definitions”), 37 -30.60 (Residential Low Density District), 37 -30.110 (Residential Medium Density District), 37-30.160 (Residential High Density District), 37-30.200 (Commercial Districts), 37 -30.240 (Mixed Use Districts) and adds Section 37-50.235 – School District orCommunity College District Housing to Chapter of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code).

The Salinas Union High School District (SUHSD) approac hed Community Development Department staff regarding the possible acquisition of an empty apartment complex to provide affordable housing for teachers and other school employees. Unfortunately, existing regulations restrict large employer housing and would not allow the school district to acquire property for this use. Upon further discussions with the SUHSD, staff learned about the California Teacher Housing Act of 2016. To facilitate affordable housing for school employees and to be consistent with the Act, staff initiated the ZCA. The provisions of the ZCA closely follow the regulations outlined in the Teacher Housing Act of 2016. The Act is currently in the amendment process to include community college districts and is expected to pass.

A public hearin g notice for the April 6, 2022 Planning Commission meeting regarding the proposed ZCA was published in the Monterey County Herald on Saturday March 26, 2022. On April 6, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Salinas Planning Commission recommended 4-0 that the City Council introduce and adopt Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002.

DISCUSSION:

In drafting the proposed ZCA, staff is proposing a change to the definition of employee housing under Section 37 -10.290 (“E Definitions”) to exclude a s chool district or c ommunity college district. Employee housing as currently defined in the code includes “dwellings and other housing accommodations provided and maintained by an employer for employees in connection with work or the place where work is being performed, whether or not rent is involved. Employee housing may be developed or managed by a party other than the employer, provided the employer retains control and ultimate responsibility for the facility”. Clearly, any type of housing controlled by a school distr ict or community college district would meet this definition. Therefore, it was Page | 3
necessary to not only modify the definition of “employee housing”, but to add a new definition under 37-30.420 (“S Definitions”) for school district or community college district housing.

One of the reasons for the current restriction on employee housing is to prevent employers from acquiring occupied apartment buildings and displacing tenants. As the need for housing for H2A workers continues to explode, there is a real worry by residents that lifting the restriction will result in agricultural employers purchasing housing complexes for these temporary employees thereby causing widespread displacement. To be sensitive to these concerns, the proposed amendment is very narrow in scope applying only to school and community college districts as defined under the Teacher Housing Act of 2016. In addition, staff included provisions for notification and relocation assistance to minimize any impacts if a school or community college district acquires occupied housing that may result in displacement. These provisions are outlined in Section 37-50.235 – School District and Community College District Housing under Division 1. – Special Regulations Applying to All Districts.

To provide clarity to planners on implementation, ensure consistency with the General Plan, and promote neighborhood compatibility, the use classification of “School District or Community College District Housing” has been added to the tables of all Zoning Districts that allow residential uses including Sections 37-30.60 (Residential Low Density District), 37 -30.110 (Residential Medium Density District), 37-30.160 (Residential High Density District), 37-30.200 (Commercial Districts), 37-30.240 (Mixed Use Districts), an d 37-30.390 (Public/Semipublic District). These tables contain footnotes that require construction or rehabilitation to conform to the development regulations and design standards of the underlying zoning district. This will ensure projects fit in with the character of the neighborhood.

The proposed ZCA is part of an ongoing effort of the City to eliminate barriers to the production of housing. There is no doubt that the City of Salinas is experiencing a housing shortage. As a result, the City has been exp loring creative ways to increase opportunities for housing given the limited availability of land for infill development and funding. Over the last couple of years, the City has used grant funding to initiate Zoning Code Amendments or zone changes to facil itate housing opportunities throughout the City. For example, on October 22, 2019, the City approved Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA 2019 -003) allowing residential with a CUP in the Public/Semipublic (PS) Zoning District. One of the reasons for that change was to encourage school districts to build housing on their available sites. Since the State of California is mandating significant increases in a jurisdiction’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), it is even more critical to partner with the school and community college districts to build workforce units.

Findings

The proposed Amendment would not result in uses inconsistent with any land use designation. It would allow a school district or community college district to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staff or public. This use is consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016. The Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA 2022 -002) would be consistent with General Plan Goal LU -1 by providing housing for school/community college employees to “achieve a balance of land uses to provide for a range of housing, jobs, libraries, and educational and recreational facilities that allow residents to live, work, shop, learn, and play in th e Page | 4
community”. ZCA 2022 -002 is also consistent with General Plan Policy LU -1.2 which states “provide a plan for land uses that includes the capacity to accommodate growth projected for 2020 and beyond” and Policy LU3.8 to “encourage the production of housin g that meets the needs of agricultural and other essential workers within the community. Multiple studies including a 2018 report from UC Berkely, Terner Center for Housing Innovation have identified lack of affordable housing for teachers and educational employees as a cause for worker shortages in California schools. Allowing this use, will enable school and community college districts to meet the housing needs of this essential workforce.

ZCA 2022 -002 will not reverse existing policies, because the prop osed changes would be consistent with the General Plan. The proposed amendment is in substantial conformance with the purposes, intent, and provisions of the General Plan. In fact, the proposed amendment actually advances multiple provisions in the Land Us e and Housing Elements. As stated above, the proposed Amendment would be consistent with General Plan Policy LU -3.8 which encourages “the production of housing that meets that needs of agricultural and other essential workers within the community”. ZCA 2022-002 will not only help stabilize the educational workforce, but it will ensure that we have the staff to prepare the next generation of Salinas’ workforce currently attending local schools and Hartnell Community College.

Finally, ZCA 2022 -002 would fu rther Policy H -3.8, which aims to support collaborative partnerships of nonprofit organizations, affordable housing developers, major employers, and market-rate housing developers to expand affordable housing opportunities for those working in the City of Salinas and surrounding areas”. When the City was first approached by the Salinas Union High School District, staff was excited about the opportunity to facilitate this type of collaboration by eliminating a restriction that would prevent the district from acquiring or developing new affordable housing units.

Additional findings in support of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment are incorporated in the attached Planning Commission Resolution.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The environmental impacts of the Zoning Code Amendment 202 2-002 has been analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is found to be categorically exempt (Class 5) from further environmental analysis per CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations), because it would not result in a significant environmental impact. The proposed Amendment would not result in a significant environmental impact since it would only allow a s chool district or c ommunity college district to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staff or public. This use is consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The proposed Amendment has been coordinated among the Current Planning and Plan and Project Implementation Divisions of the Community Development Department. The Legal Department always provides critical review of proposed zoning code amendments.

Page | 5
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The proposed Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA) advances the City Council Goal of Housing/Affordable Housing by helping increase affordable workforce housing for school and community college employees.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

This is a regulatory c hange to the Zoning Code. Other than staff time, there are no significant impacts to the City’s General Fund

ATTACHMENTS:

Draft City Council Ordinance
Planning Commission Resolution
Teacher Housing Act of 2016
Publication
Powerpoint Presentation

1 ORDINANCE NO. (N.C.S)

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 37-10.290 (“E” DEFINITIONS), 37-10.430 (“S” DEFINITIONS), 37-30.60 (RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT), 37-30.110 (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICTS), 37-30.160 (RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY DISTRICTS), 37-30.200 (COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS), 37-30.230 (MIXED USE DISTRICTS), AND 37-30.390 (PUBLIC/SEMIPUBLIC DISTRICT), AND ADDING SECTION 37-50.235 - SCHOOL DISTRICT OR COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT HOUSING TO CHAPTER 37 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE (ZONING CODE) (ZCA-2002-002)

WHEREAS, on November 7, 2006, the Salinas City Council, adopted Ordinance Number 2463 replacing the existing Zoning Code; and

WHEREAS, the Salinas City Council has amended various provisions of Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (“Zoning Code”) fifteen times to allow for general changes, language clarification, and minor corrections; and

WHEREAS, in the last several years, the Salinas City Council consistent with the 2015 Housing Element has initiated several zoning code amendments to facilitate the production of housing to address Salinas’ severe housing shortage; and

WHEREAS, the City received funding from SB 2 to facilitate zone changes or zoning code amendments to increase available land for housing and on November 5, 2019, the Salinas City Council adopted Ordinance Number 2624 allowing residential uses in the Public/Semipublic (PS) Zoning District subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and

WHEREAS, the City also adopted zoning code amendments to allow certain residential uses in the Commercial Thoroughfare (CT) Zoning District and expanded employee housing opportunities in the Residential Low Density (R -L) and Residential Medium Density (R -M) Zoning Districts; and

WHEREAS, the Salinas Union High School District (SUHSD) approached City staff regarding the possible acquisition of an empty apartment complex to provide affordable housing for teachers and other school employees; and

WHEREAS, existing regulations restrict large employer housing and would not allow the school district to acquire property for this use; and

WHEREAS, the City is interested in advancing the Housing El ement by enabling the school and community college districts to facilitate affordable housing for school employees and the public consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016; and

WHEREAS, on April 6, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Salinas Planning Commission recommended that the City Council introduce and adopt Zoning Code Amendment

2 2022-002, which amends Sections 37-10.290 (“E Definitions”), 37-30.420 (“S Definitions”), 37-

30.60 (Residential Low Density District), 37-30.110 (Residential Medium Density District), 37-

30.160 (Residential High Density District), 37-30.200 (Commercial Districts) , 37-30.240 (Mixed Use Districts) and 37-30.390 (Public/Semipublic District), and adds Section 37-50.235 – School District or Community College District Housing to Chapter of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code); and

WHEREAS, on April 26, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council weighed the evidence, including the Staff Report which is on file at the Community Development Department together with the record of environmental review and hereby finds that the following amendment will not have the effect of reversing policies of the Salinas General Plan or other plans and policies previously adopted by the City Council and the City Council finds the project to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as follows:

Categorical Exemption:

1. The project has been found to be a Class 5 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Guidelines Section 15305 of the Guidelines to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The proposed Zoning Code Amendment to amend Sections 37-10.290 (“E Definitions”), 37-30.420 (“S Definitions”) , 37-30.60 (Residential Low Density District), 37-30.110 (Residential Medium Density District), 37-30.160 (Residential High Density District), 37-

30.200 (Commercial Districts) , 37-30.240 (Mixed Use Districts) and add Section 37-

50.235 – School District or Community College District Housing to Chapter of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) is categorically exempt from further environmental analysis per CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations).

The proposed Amendment would not result in a significant environmental impact since it would only allow School Districts and Community College Districts to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staff or public. Thi s use is consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016.

WHEREAS, the Salinas City Council adopts the following findings, as set forth in Zoning Code Section 37 -60.1120, as the basis for its introduction and adoption of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment:

Zoning Code Amendment 2021-005:

1. The Amendment is consistent with the Salinas General Plan and other plans and policies adopted by the Salinas City Council.

The proposed Amendment would not result in uses inconsistent with any land use designation. It would allow school and community college districts to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staff or public. This use is consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016 and proposed amendment that would include community college districts . The Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA 2022 -002)

3 would be consistent with General Plan Goal LU -1 by providing housing for school/community college employees to “achieve a balance of land uses to provide for a range of housing, jobs, libraries, and educational and recreational facilities that allow residents to live, work, shop, learn, and play in the community”. ZCA 2022-002 is also consistent with General Plan Policy LU-1.2 which states “provide a plan for land uses that includes the capacity to accommodate growth projected for 2020 and beyond” and Policy LU3.8 to “encourage the production of housing that meets the needs of agricultural and other essential workers within the community . Multiple studies including a 2018 report from UC Berkely, Terner Center for Housing Innovation have identified lack of affordable housing for teachers and educational employees as a cause for worker shortages in California schools. Allowing this use, will enable school districts to meet the housing needs of this essential workforce.

As outlined in ZCA 2022-002, school or community college district housing involving construction or rehabilitation would be subject to the u nderlying zoning district development regulations and design standards. This provision has been added as a footnote for every relevant use table. As a result, ZCA 2022 -002 would be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Code.

2. The Amendment will not have the effect of reversing the policies of the Salinas General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan, and other plans and policies adopted by the Salinas City Council.

As stated above, the proposed Amendment would be consistent with General Plan Policy LU-3.8 which encourages “the production of housing that meets that needs of agricultural and other essential workers within the community”. ZCA 2022 -002 will not only help stabilize the educational workforce, but it will ensure that the community has the staff to prepare the next generation of Salinas’ workforce currently attending local schools and Hartnell Community College.

The proposed Amendment is also consistent with multiple policies in the Housing Element such as Policy H -1.7, which states “ ensure that new residential development and reuse/revitalization projects are compatible with surrounding neighborhoods by requiring new development to comply with the City’s Zoning Code development regulations and design standards”. As stated above, a footnote would be added to ensure that school and community college district housing comply with the underlying zoning regulations. ZCA 2022-002 would also advance Policies H-1.8 and H-1.9 by reducing “municipal constraints to the production, maintenance, and development of decent, safe housing” and encouraging the “development of higher density apartments…in areas that are near major transit corridor…and near to key d estinations (parks, schools, childcare, stores, healthy food options, employment, social services, and healthcare)”. This amendment would eliminate the zoning code barrier that restricts school and community college districts from

4 facilitating the development of teacher and school/college employee housing. ZCA 2022- 002 would allow for the potential development of affordable housing on school sites and other key destinations.

The amendment also would promote Policies H-1.12 by continuing “to create affordable housing through innovative solutions for financing with multiple funding sources and affordable housing partners including local, private, state, and federal sources”. The school and community college districts have a variety of available funding sourc es including bonds that can be a mechanism to support affordable housing for teachers and staff. This is one of the reasons for the Teacher Hosing Act of 2016. Finally, ZCA 2022-002 would further Policy H -3.8, which aims to support collaborative partnerships of nonprofit organizations, affordable housing developers, major employers, and market -rate housing developers to expand affordable housing opportunities for those working the City of Salinas and surrounding areas”. When the City was first approached by the Salinas Union High School District, staff was excited about the opportunity to facilitate this type of collaboration by eliminating a restriction that would prevent the district from acquiring or developing new affordable housing units. However, recog nizing many residents’ concern that a school or community college district may purchase occupied rental units and create displacement, ZCA 2022 -002 includes requirements for notification and relocation assistance to mitigate potential impacts should this occur in the future.

3. The Amendment would not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent zoning districts.

The proposed establishment of this Ordinance will not create any additional zoning districts.

4. The City has the capability to provide public utilities, roads, and services to serve the uses allowed by the proposed amendment.

Salinas is an urbanized area and public infrastructure is presently in place to serve most uses. The proposed Amendment would not create the need for additional infrastructure.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF SALINAS AS FOLLOWS: (Revisions are shown in underline/strikethrough text)

SECTION 1. Amend Zoning Code Section 37-10.290. “E” definitions and 37-10.430. “S” definitions as follows:

Sec. 37-10.290. “E” definitions.

Employee Housing. Dwellings and other housing accommodations provided and maintained by an employer for employees in connection with work or the place where work is being performed, whether or not rent is involved. Employee housing may be developed or managed by a party other than the employer, provided the employer retains control and ultimate responsibility for the facility. Housing for agricultural workers is also considered employee housing. Employee

5 Housing does not include school district or community college district housing, which is defined and regulated in Sections 37-10.430 and 37-50.235.

Sec. 37-10.430. “S” definitions.

School District or Community College District Housing. Any affordable rental housing at the low - and moderate -income levels that a school district or community college district acquires, constructs, rehabilitates, or preserves consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016 and as may be amended by the State L egislature. See Section 37 -50.235: school district or community college district housing.

SECTION 2. Amend Zoning Code Section 37-30.040. – Residential low density (R-L) district. Alphabetically add School District or Community College District Housing to Table 37-

30.30 and numerically add Footnote (16):

Table 37-30.30

Residential Low Density (R-L) District Use Classifications Land Use R-L-5.5 Additional Use Regulations
Residential Uses
Residential Service Facilities NP
School District or Community College District Housing CUP (16) Single-family Dwellings—Attached NP
Single-family Dwellings—Detached P (12)

(16) Construction or rehabilitation of School District or Community College District Housing shall comply with the development regulations of Section 37-30.070 and design standards of 37-30.080.

SECTION 3. Amend Zoning Code Section 37-30.090. – Residential medium density (R-M) districts and alphabetically add School District or Community College District Housing to Table 37-30.50 and numerically add Footnote (19):

Table 37-30.50

Residential Medium Density (R-M) Districts Use Classifications Land Use R-M-3.6 R-M-2.9 Additional Use Regulations
Residential Uses
Residential Service Facilities NP CUP
School District or Community College District
Housing
CUP SPR (19)
Single-family Dwellings—Attached CUP SPR (14)

(19) Construction or rehabilitation of School District or Community College District Housing shall comply with the development regulations of Section 37-30.120 and design standards of 37-30.130.

6 SECTION 4. Amend Zoning Code Section 37-30.140. – Residential high density (R-H) districts and alphabetically add School District or Community College District Housing to Table 37-30.70 and numerically add Footnote (15):

Table 37-30.70

Residential Medium Density (R-H) Districts Use Classifications Land Use R-H-2.1 R-H-1.8 Additional Use Regulations
Residential Uses
Residential Service Facilities CUP CUP
School District or Community College
District Housing
SPR SPR (19)
Single-family Dwellings—Attached SPR SPR (14)
(15) Construction or rehabilitation of School District or Community College District Housing shall comply with the development regulations of Section 37-30.170 and design standards of 37-30.180.

SECTION 5. Amend Zoning Code Division 3. – Commercial (C) Districts and alphabetically add School District or Community College District Housing to Table 37-30.90 and numerically add Footnote (40):

Table 37-30.90

Commercial (C) Districts Use Classifications
Land Use CO/R CO CR CT Additional Use

Regulations
Residential Uses
Residential Service Facilities CUP CUP CUP NP
School District or Community
College District Housing
SPR SPR SPR CUP (40)
Second Dwelling Units SPR NP NP NP (2)

(40) Construction or rehabilitation of School District or Community College District Housing shall comply with the development regulations of Section 37-30.210 and design standards of 37-30.220.

SECTION 6. Amend Zoning Code Division 4. – Mixed Use (MU) Districts and alphabetically add School District or Community College District Housing to Table 37-30.110 and numerically add Footnote (46):

Table 37-30.110

Mixed Use (MU) Districts Use Classifications
Land Use MAF MX Additional Use

Regulations
Residential Uses
Residential Service Facilities CUP CUP (3)

7 School District or Community College
District Housing
CUP SPR (46)
Second Dwelling Units NP NP

(46) Construction or rehabilitation of School District or Community College District Housing shall comply with the development regulations of Section 37-30.250, mixed used building incentives of Section 37-30.260, modification of use regulations of 37 -30.270, design standards of 37 -30.280, and exemptions from development regulations and design standards of Section 37-30.290.

SECTION 7. Amend Zoning Code Division 7. – Public/Semipublic (PS) District and alphabetically add School District or Community College District Housing to Table 37-30.170 and add Footnote (12) and (13):

Table 37-30.170

Public/Semipublic (PS) District Use Classifications
Land Use PS Additional Use Regulations
Residential Uses
Residential Service Facilities CUP (12)(13)
School District or Community College District
Housing
CUP (12)(13)
Single-family Dwellings—Attached CUP (12)(13)

SECTION 8. Section 37-50.235 – School District or Community District Housing shall be added to the Zoning Code and reflect the following additions in underline:

Sec. 37-50.235 – School District or Community College District Housing.

(a) Purpose. Facilitate the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of affordable rental housing for teachers, faculty, school district employees, and community college district employees to allow teachers, faculty, school district employees, or community college district employees to access and maintain housing stability.

(b) Definitions.

(1) Affordable rental housing . A rental housing development, as defined in the Teacher Housing Act of 2016 with a majority of its rents restricted to levels that are affordable to persons and families of low or moderate income.

(2) Local public employees. Includes employees of a city, county, city and county, charter city, charter c ounty, charter city and county, special district, or any combination thereof.

(3) Teacher, faculty, school district employee, or community college district employee .

Any person employed by a unified school district maintaining prekindergarten, transitional kindergarten, and grades 1 to 12, inclusive, an elementary school district

8 maintaining prekindergarten, transitional kindergarten, and grades 1 to 8, inclusive, a high school district maintaining grades 9 to 12, inclusive, or a community college district, including, but not limited to, certificated and classified staff.

(c) Applicability. These provisions only apply to teacher, faculty, school district employee, and community college district employee housing as defined by the State of California, Teacher Housing Act of 2016 and as may be amended from time to time.

(d) Requirements.

(1) A school district or community college district may develop or provide employee housing for a teacher, faculty, school district employee, or community college district employee consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016 and as may be amended from time to time.

(2) Teacher, faculty, school district employee, or community college district employee housing may be developed or managed by a party other than the school or college district (employer) , provided the employer retains control and ultimate responsibility for the facility.

(3) Housing shall be restricted to teacher, faculty, school district employees, or community college district employees, except that a school district or community college district may allow local public employees or other members of the public consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016 and federal Fair Housing law.

(4) A school district or community college district shall retain the right to prioritize school district or community college district employees over local public employees or other members of the public to occupy housing as allowed by the Teacher Housing Act of 2016 and as may be amended from time to time.

(e) Relocation assistance. If acquisition of occupied housing would result in displacement of tenants, the school district or community college district shall provide notification and relocation assistance as outlined below:

(1) Notification. All tenants shall be given written notice at l east 90 days before the date the property must be vacated . Notice shall comply with the legal requirements for service by mail contained in Code of Civil Procedure, Sections 1012, 1013, and 1013a or as otherwise required by law or shall be made by personal delivery to each tenant or other person entitled to receive notice . Confirmation of written acknowledgement of receipt of the notice is required . If a rental agreement was negotiated in another language such as in Spanish, all required notices to that ten ant shall be issued in that language. The school district or community college district shall provide the City proof of noticing of tenants to comply with the provisions of this section .

(2) The district shall provide relocation assistance of two times the monthly rent for any tenant household living in any unit before notification of intent to vacate is provided.

9 Relocation assistance s hall be in addition to and shall not affect or be affected by any other monetary amounts due to or by the tenant that are payable as a result of the termination of tenancy, including security deposits. Eligible tenants shall be paid relocation assistance at least fourteen days before the tenant is scheduled to vacate the unit. Tenants who have given notice of their i ntent to vacate prior to receipt of required notification shall not be eligible for relocation assistance.

SECTION 9. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty days from and after its adoption.

SECTION 10. The Salinas City Clerk is hereby directed to cause the following summary of this ordinance to be published by one (1) insertion in The Monterey Herald , a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Salinas and hereby designated for that purpose by the Salinas City Council:

“An Ordinance amending Chapter 37 -10.290 (“E” Definitions), 37-10.430 (“S” Definitions), 37-30.60 (Residential Low Density District), 37-30.110 (Residential Medium Density Districts), 37-30.160 (Residential High Density Districts), 37-30.200 (Commercial Districts), 37-30.230 (Mixed Use Districts), and 37 -30.390 (Public/Semipublic District), and adding Section 37 -50.235 – School District or Community College District Housing to Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to allow school and college districts to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for their staff and public consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016 (ZCA 2022-002).”

SECTION 11. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

The Salinas City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, clause and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

This Ordinance was introduced and read on _____, 202 2 and passed and adopted on ________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED

_________________________________

10 Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST

Patricia Barajas, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney

SALINAS PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLTITION NO. 2022. 02

RDSOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AN ORDTNANCE AMENDTNG SECTIONS 37-10.290 C.E"
DEFTNTTTONS), 37-10.430 c.S" DEFTNTTTONS), 37-30.60 (RESTDENTIAL LOW DENSTTY DTSTRTCT), 37-30.1 l0 (RES|DENTTAL MEDIt.IM DENSITy DTSTRTCTS),

37.30,I60 (RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY DISTRICTS), 37.30.200 (COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS), 37-30.230 (MIXED USE DTSTRTCTS), AND 37-30.390 (PUBLTC/SEMIPUBLTC DTSTRTCT), AND ADDTNG SECTION 37-50.235 - SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE, DISTRICT HOUSING TO CHAPTER3T OF THE

MUNICIPAL CODE (ZONING CODE)
(zcA,-2002-002)
WHERf,AS, on November 7, 2006, the Salinas City Council. adopted Ordinance Number 2463 replacing the existing Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS. the Salinas City Council has amonded various provisions of Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code ("Zoning Code") fifteen times to allow for general changes. language clarificalion, and minor corrections; and
WHEREAS, in the last several years, the Salinas City Council consistent with the 2015 Housing Element has initiated several zoning code amendments to facilitate the production of housing to address Salinas' severe housing shortage; and WHEREAS, the City received funding tiom SB 2 to facilitate zone changes or zoning code amendments to increase available land for housing and on November 5,2019. the Salinas City Council adopted Ordinance Number 2624 allowing residential uses in the Public/Semipublic (PS) Zoning District subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS. the City also adopted zoning code amendments to allow certain residential uses in the Commercial Thoroughfare (CT) Zoning District and expanded employee housing opportunities in the Residential Low Density (R-L) and Residential Medium Density (R-M) Zoning Districts; and
WHEREAS, the Salinas Union High School District (SUHSD) approached City staff regarding the possible acquisition of an empty apartment complex to provide affordable housing for teachers and other school employeesl and
WHEREAS, existing regulations restrict large employer housing and would not allow the school district to acquire property tbr this use: and
WHEREAS, the City is interested in advancing rhe Housing Element by enabling the school and communily college districts to facilitate affordable housing for school employees and the public consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 201 6; and WHEREAS. on April 6.2022, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Salinas Planning commission recommended that the city council introduce and adopl Zoning code Amendmenl 2022-002. which amends Sections 37-10.290 ("E Definitions"). 37-30.420 ('.S Definitions.'), 37- Planning Commission Resolution 2022-
Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002

Page 2 of 5 ends

30.60 (Residential Low Density District). 37-30.1 l0 (Residential Medium Density District), 37-

30.160 (Residential High Density Distric0, 37-30.200 (Commercial Districts), 37 -30.240 (Mixed Use Districts) and 37-30.390 (Public/Semipublic District), and add Sec. 37-50.235 - School District and Community College District Housing to Chapter of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code); and
WHEREAS, on April 6,2022, the Salinas Planning Commission weighed the evidence presented at hearing, including the Staff Report which is on file at the Community Development ,-Department together with the record of environmental review and hereby finds that the following amendment will not have the effect ofreversing policies ofthe Salinas General Plan or other plans and policies previously adopted by the City Council and finds the project to be categorically exempt from the Califomia Environmental Quatity Act (CEQA), as tbllows:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE lT RESOLVED by the Salinas Planning Commission that the Commission recommends that the City Council find the project to be categorically exempt from the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and introduce and then adopt Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002: and
BE lT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas Planning Commission adopts the fbllowing lindings as the basis for its determination, and that the foregoing recitations are true and correct, and are included herein by reference as findings:
l. The projecl has been found lo be a Class 5 Cotegorical Exemption pursuant lo Guidelines Section 15305 of the Guidelines to the California Environmental Quality Act (cEQA).

The proposed Zoning Code Amendment to amend Sections 37-10.290 ("8 Defrnitions"), 37 -30.420 ("S Definitions"), 37-30.60 (Residential Low Density District), 37-30.1l0 (Residential Medium Density District), 3 7-30.160 (Residential High Density District),37-

30.200 (Commercial Dislricts), 37-30.240 (Mixed Use Districts) and add Sec. 37-50.235 - School District and Community College District Housing to Chapter of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) is categorically exempt from further environmental analysis per CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations).

The proposed Amendment would not result in a significant environmental impact since it would only allow School Districts and Community College Districts to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staff or public. This use is consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016.

Categorical Exemption:

Planning Commission Resolution 2022-
Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002

Page 3 of 5 ends

I - The Amendment is consistent with the Salinas Generol Plan and other plans and policies adopted by the Solinas City Council,
The proposed Amendment would not result in uses inconsistent with any land use designation. It would allow School Districts and Community College Districts to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staffor public. This use is consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016. The Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA 2022-002) would be consistent with General Plan Goal LU-l by providing housing for school/community college employees to "achieve a balance of land uses to provide for a range of housing, jobs, libraries. and educational and recreational facilities that allow residents to [ive, work, shop. leam, and play in the community''. ZCA 2022-002 is also consistent with General Plan Policy LU-1.2 which states "provide a plan fbr land uses thal includes the capacity to accommodate growth projected for 2020 and beyond" and Policy LU3.8 to "encourage the production of housing that meets the needs of agricultural and other essential workers within the community. Multipte studies including UC Berkety, Temer Center for Housing lmovation have identified lack of affbrdable housing for teachers and educational employees as a cause for worker shortages in Califbmia schools.

Allowing this use. will enable school districts to meet the housing needs of this essential workforce.

2. The Amendmenl will nol have the effect of reversing the policies of the Solinas Generol Plan, any applicable Specijic Plan, ond other plans and policies adopted by the Salinas City Council.

As stated above, the proposed Amendment would be consistent with General Plan Policy LU-3.8 which encourages "the production ofhousing that meets that needs ofagricultural and other essential workers within the community". ZCA 2022-002 will not only help stabilize the educational workforce, but it will ensure that we have the staff to prepare the nexl generation of Salinas' workforce in our schools and Hartnell Community College.

WHEREAS, the Salinas City Council adopts the following findings, as set forth in Zoning Code Section 37-60.1120, as the basis for its introduction and adoption of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment:

Zoning Code Amendment 2021-005:

As outlined in ZCA 2022-002, school district or community college housing involving construction or rehabilitation would be subject to the underlying zoning district development regulations and design standards. This provision has been added as a footnote for every relevant use table. As a result, ZCA 2022-002 would be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Code.

Planning Commission Resolution 2022-
Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002

Page 4 of 5 ends

The proposed Amendment is also consistent with multiple policies in the Housing Element such as Policy H-1.7, which states "ensure that new residential development and reuse/revitalization projects are compatible with surrounding neighborhoods by requiring new developments to comply with the City's Zoning Code development regulations and design standards". As stated above, a lootnote would be added to ensure that school district and community college district housing comply with the underlying zoning regulations.

ZCA 2022-002 would also advance Poticies H- I .8 and H- l .9 by reducing "municipal constraints to the production, maintenance, and development ofdecent, safe housing" and encouraging the "development ofhigher density apartments... in areas that are near major transit corridor...and near to key destinations (parks, schools, childcare. stores, healthy food options, employment, social services, and healthcare)". 'fhis amendment would eliminate the zoning code barrier that restricts school districts and community college districts from facilitating the development ofteaefier and school/college employee housing.

ZCA 2022-002 would allow for the potential development ofaffordable housing on school sites and other key destinations.

The amendment also would promote Policies H-1.12 by continuing "to create affordable housing through innovative solutions for financing with multiple funding sources and affordable housing partners including local, private, state, and federal sources". The school and community college districts have a variety ol available funding sources including bonds that can be a mechanism to support affordable housing for teachers and staff. This is one of the reasons for the Teacher Hosing Act of 201 6. Finally, ZCA 2022-002 would further Policy H-3.8, which aims to support collaborative partnerships of nonprofit organizations, alfordable housing developers, major employers, and market-rate housing developers to expand affordable housing opportunities for those working the City of Salinas and surrounding areas". When the City has lirst approached by the Salinas Union High School District, staff was excited about the opportunity to facilitate this type of collaboration by eliminating a restriction that would prevent the district from acquiring or developing new affordable housing units. However, recognizing many residents' concern that employers may purchase occupied rental units and create displacement, ZCA 2022- 002 includes requirements for notification and relocation assistance to mitigate potential impact should this occur in the tuture.

3. The Amendment woultl nol create an isolaled districl unreloled lo adjacent zoning districts.

The proposed establishment of this Ordinance will not create any additional zoning districts

4. The Cily has the copability lo provide public utililies, roads, and services to serve lhe uses allowed by the proposed omendment.

Salinas is an urbanized area and public infrastructure is presently in place to serve most uses. The proposed Amendment would not create the need for additional infrastructure.

Planning Commission Resolution 2022-
Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002

Page 5 of 5 ends

PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of April2O22, by the following vote:

AYES: Chairperson Meeks, Commissioners Griffin, Gonzalez, and McKelvey Daye
NOES: None
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT: Commissioners Donohue. Farias. and Manzo
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, truq and correct copy of a Resolution ofthe Planning Commission ofthe City of Salinas. that said Resolution was passed and approved by the affirmative and majority vote of said Planning Commission at a meeting hetd on April 6. 2022, and that said Resolution has not been modified. amended, or rescinded, and is now in full force and effect.

SALINAS NN G COMMISSION
Date 4
ssntan
Secretarv
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1719
SHARE THIS:

Date Published: 03/22/2022 09:00 PM
AB-1719 Housing: Teacher Housing Act of 2016: faculty and community college district employees.(202

AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 22, 2022
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2021–2022 REGULAR SESSION
Introduced by Assembly Member Ward
January 27, 2022
An act to amend Sections 53571, 53572, 53573, and 53574 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to housing.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1719, as amended, Ward. Housing: Teacher Housing Act of 2016: faculty and community college district employees.

Existing law, the Teacher Housing Act of 2016, authorizes a school district to establish and implement programs that addressthe housing needs of teachers and school district employees who face challenges in securing affordable housing, as provided.Under existing law, a program established under the act is restricted to “teacher or school district employees,” except asspecified. Existing law defines the term “teacher or school district employees” for these purposes to mean any person employedby a unified school district maintaining prekindergarten, transitional kindergarten, and grades 1 to 12, inclusive, an elementaryschool district maintaining prekindergarten, transitional kindergarten, and grades 1 to 8, inclusive, or a high school districtmaintaining grades 9 to 12, inclusive, including, but not limited to, certificated and classified staff.

This bill would expand the authorized scope of a program established under the Teacher Housing Act of 2016 to include housingfor faculty and community college district employees and would make various conforming changes in this regard. The bill wouldalso specify that a school district or community college district may allow foster youth or former foster youth to occupy housingcreated through the program.

Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: no THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Section 53571 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
53571. (a) The purpose of this part is to facilitate the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of affordablerental housing for teachers, faculty, school district employees, and community college district employees to allow teachers,faculty, school district employees, or community college district employees to access and maintain housing stability. (b) A program established under this part shall be restricted to “teacher, faculty, school district employees, or communitycollege district employees,” except that a school district or community college district may allow local public employees or othermembers of the public, including foster youth or former foster youth, public to occupy housing created through this part,subject to applicable laws and regulations. (c) A school district or community college district shall retain the right to prioritize school district or community college districtemployees over local public employees or other members of the public to occupy housing.

HomeBill Information California LawPublicationsOther ResourcesMy SubscriptionsMy Favorites SEC. 2. Section 53572 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
53572. As used in this part:
(a) “Affordable rental housing” means a rental housing development, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 50675.2, with amajority of its rents restricted to levels that are affordable to persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined inSection 50093, but neither definition is restrictive to only projects with five or more units. (b) “Local public employees” includes employees of a city, county, city and county, charter city, charter county, charter city andcounty, special district, or any combination thereof. (c) “Teacher, faculty, school district employee, or community college district employee” means any person employed by a unifiedschool district maintaining prekindergarten, transitional kindergarten, and grades 1 to 12, inclusive, an elementary schooldistrict maintaining prekindergarten, transitional kindergarten, and grades 1 to 8, inclusive, a high school district maintaininggrades 9 to 12, inclusive, or a community college district, including, but not limited to, certificated and classified staff.

SEC. 3. Section 53573 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
53573. A school district or community college district may establish and implement programs that address the housing needs ofteachers, faculty, school district employees, and community college district employees who face challenges in securingaffordable housing. To the extent feasible, the school district or community college district may establish and implementprograms that, among other things, do the following:
(a) Leverage federal, state, and local public, private, and nonprofit programs and fiscal resources available to housingdevelopers. (b) Promote public and private partnerships.
(c) Foster innovative financing opportunities.

SEC. 4. Section 53574 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
53574. This part specifically creates a state policy supporting housing for teachers, faculty, school district employees, andcommunity college district employees as described in Section 42(g)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code, and, further, permitsschool districts, community college districts, and developers in receipt of local or state funds or tax credits designated foraffordable rental housing to restrict occupancy to teachers, faculty, school district employees, and community college districtemployees on land owned by school districts or community college districts, including permitting school districts, communitycollege districts, and developers in receipt of tax credits designated for affordable rental housing to retain the right to prioritizeand restrict occupancy on land owned by school districts or community college districts to teachers, faculty, school districtemployees of the school district that owns the land, and community college district employees of the community college districtthat owns the land, so long as that housing does not violate any other applicable laws.

SEC. 5. The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shallnot affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.

Public Hearing Notice
Salinas City Council
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 4:00 p.m.

Salinas Council Chamber Rotunda
200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas CA
The City of Salinas is proposing a Zoning Code Amendment to allow a school or community college district to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable housing for teachers or school district employees consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016 passed by the State of California. School districts would not be subject to the current regulations regarding Employee Housing in the Zoning Code. On April 6, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Zoning Code Amendment.

A public hearing will be held before the Salinas City Council on Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber Rotunda, 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, to consider Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002 (ZCA 2022-002).

The environmental impacts of this project have been analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The proposed Zoning Code Amendment is categorically exempt (Class 5) from further environmental analysis per CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations).

If you challenge the final decision on Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002 in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, subsequent appeal hearings, or in written correspondence delivered to the reviewing body at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Subject to exhaustion of administrative remedies, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 requires you to initiate such a proceeding in court within 90 days of the final decision in these matters. Further information on this matter may be obtained by contacting Megan Hunter, City of Salinas, Community Development Department, 65 West Alisal Street at [email protected] or (831) 758-7206.

Disabled persons requiring accommodation in order to participate in the public hearing may contact the Community Development Department, City of Salinas, 65 West Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93901, (831) 758-7206. Hearing impaired or TTY/TDD text telephone users may contact the City by dialing 711 for the California Relay Service (CRS) or by telephoning any other service providers’ CRS telephone number.

PATRICIA BARAJAS
City Clerk

AVISO IMPORTANTE, SI DESEA UNA TRADUCCION DE ESTE AVISO, FAVOR DE LLAMAR AL NUMERO (831) 758-7206 DENTRO LAS HORAS DE
8:00 a.m. Y 5:00 p.m., Lunes - Viernes

Zoning Code Amendment To Allow School District or
Community College District to Acquire, Construct,
Rehabilitate, or Preserve Rental Housing
Megan Hunter, Community Development Director
April 26, 2022
City Council

Zoning Code Amendment 2022-002
Amend Zoning Code Sections:
• Definitions
• 37-10.290 (“E” Definitions)
• 37-10.430 (“S Definitions)
• Base Districts (Use Table)
• Residential Low Density
• Residential Medium Density
• Residential High Density
• Commercial & Mixed Use
• Public/Semi-Public
Add Section to Special
Regulations Applying to All
Districts:
• Allow School District or
Community College District
to Provide Housing
• Consistent with Teacher Act
of 2016
• Relocation assistance
requirement for acquisition
of occupied building
Background
• Existing zoning regulations would preclude the School District from owning housing for employees
• Salinas Union High School District interested in acquiring a new apartment complex for employee housing
• Teacher Housing Act of 2016 allows School Districts to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing • State legislature is in process of amending the law to include Community College Districts
• Planning Commission (4-0 Vote) Recommended Approval
Discussion
• Amendment would exclude School or Community College District Housing from definition of Employee Housing
• ZCA would not change the restrictions on employee housing for other employers.
• Create definitions for School District or Community College District Housing
• The use of School District or Community College District Housing would be added to the use tables of base districts where housing is permitted
Discussion (Continued)
• New construction or rehabilitation would have to follow the requirements of zoning code – development regulations & design standards
• Housing to be offered at affordable rent for the low or moderate levels (> 80% - 120% of Area Median Income)
• Additional language includes 90-day notification and 2 times monthly rent for relocation assistance for displacement if an occupied building is acquired
• This is consistent with a provision in the Zoning Code for Condo Conversion
Discussion - Findings
 October 22, 2019, the City approved similar ZCA 2019-003  Allowing residential uses with CUP in PS Zoning District  Consistent with General Plan Policies and Housing Element  Balance of land uses for housing, jobs, libraries, and educational and recreational facilities to allow residents to live, work, shop, learn, and play
 Encourage the production of housing that meets the needs of agricultural and other essential workers
 Various studies have identified lack of affordable housing as cause of teacher shortages
Recommendation
It is recommended that City Council:
 Find project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15305
 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations
 Would not result in a significant environment impact
 Adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 37 to allow School District or Community College District to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing for its staff or public consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-204, Version: 1
Ordinance Adding Sections to Chapter 27 of the Salinas Municipal Code Pertaining to Military Equipment
Adopt an Ordinance adding sections to Chapter 27 of the Salinas Municipal Code pertaining to Military Equipment Funding, Acquisition, and Use as required by Assembly Bill 481.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/20/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: APRIL 26, 2022
DEPARTMENT: SALINAS POLICE DEPARTMENT
FROM: ROBERTO FILICE, CHIEF OF POLICE
BY: JAMES GODWIN, POLICE SERGEANT

TONYA ERICKSON, MANAGEMENT ANALYST
TITLE: AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTIONS TO CHAPTER 27 OF THE

SALINAS MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MILITARY

EQUIPMENT

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to adopt an Ordinance pertaining to Military Equipment Funding, Acquisition, and Use, as required by Assembly Bill 481.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that City Council adopt an Ordinance pertaining to Military Equipment Funding, Acquisition, and Use, as required by Assembly Bill 481.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481 or the Bill), codified in Government Code sections 7070 through 7075 requires a law enforcement agency (LEA) to obtain approval from the applicable governing body prior to the funding, acquisition, or use of “Military Equipment” as defined by the Bil l. This approval is obtained via the adoption of a “Military Equipment” policy by Ordinance. The Salinas Police Department (SPD) seeks Salinas City Council adoption of the attached Military Equipment policy to allow SPD to continue using the vital equipment specified therein. Items deemed to be “Military Equipment” by AB 481 are used as a component of overall best practices for LEAs throughout the country. These tools have been utilized by SPD and other law enforcement agencies to enhance community and officer safety. Loss of these items would jeopardize the welfare of both our community and the peace officers within SPD.

BACKGROUND:

On September 30, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 481 – Military Equipment Funding, Acquisition, and Use into law. The Bill designates fifteen categories of police equipment items as Page | 2
Military Equipment. AB 481 requires SPD to obtain approval of the City Council, by an ordinance adopting a military equipment policy, prior to any of the following activities:

1. Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to Section 2576a of Title 10 of the United States Code.

2. Seeking funds for military equipment, including, but not limited to, applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or fede ral funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.

3. Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.

4. Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the city limits.

5. Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the City Council pursuant to this chapter.

6. Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of, military equipment.

7. Acquiring military equipment through any means not identified above.

All new acquisitions from January 1, 2022 forward require approval by City Council. To continue using existing Military Equipment, SPD is required to initiate the approval process no later than May 1, 2022. The City Council must adopt an ordinance within 180 days of the submission of the Military Equipment use policy which occurred on March 29, 2022. If not adopted, SPD must cease the usage of this equipment until it receives approval from the Council.

On March 23, 2022, SPD pub lished information about AB 481 – Military Equipment Funding, Acquisition, and Use on the Department’s webpage, with a hyperlink to an identical Spanish language webpage. The webpage contains the AB 481 defined list of police equipment deemed Military Equipment by numbered category and identifies each category of equipment SPD possesses. The webpage contains several hyperlinks to additional information , including the full text of AB 481, the SPD Military Equipment polic y, and the Military Equipment inventory currently in SPD’s possession. The webpage also contains a hyperlink to a webform where community members may ask questions, make comments, or voice concerns. Answers to those questions, and responses to the comments or concerns, are found by accessing another hyperlink.

Finally, for those wishing to make a formal complaint, a hyperlink directs them to the complaint process webpage. SPD will make the webpage available so long as Military Equipment is available for use.

Once the Ordinance is adopted, SPD must take additional steps and seek renewal of the Ordinance annually thereafter to continue using Military Equipment. First, SPD must complete an Annual Military Equipment Report for each type of Military Equipment which will include a summary of how the equipment was used and the purpose of its use, complaints or concerns received regarding the equipment, the results of any internal audits including violations of the Policy and actions taken in response, the total annual cost of the equipment and the source of the funds, the quantity of each type of equipment, and if additional acquisitions are sought in the next year. Within 30 days of Page | 3
submitting and publicly releasing the R eport, SPD will hold a community engagement meeting where the public may discuss and ask questions about the Annual Military Equipment Report.

Before adopting the Ordinance, the Council must determine several factors:

1) The Military Equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and community member safety. 2) The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
3) If purchasing additional equipment, it is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objectives of officer and community member safety. 4) Use of Military Equipment complied with the Policy that was in effect at the time of the use, or if prior uses did not comply with the Policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy non-conformance and ensure future compliance.

Once the Ordinance is adopted, City Council must review the Ordinance annually and vote whether to renew the Ordinance. The Council will determine , based on the Annual Military Equipment Report, whether the equipment has complied with these standards for approval. If a piece of equipment has not complied with these standards, the Council will eithe r disprove renewal of authorization for that type of Military Equipment or require modifications to the Policy that will resolve the non-compliance.

SPD contends the Policy and Military Equipment it possesses meets all requirements set forth in the Bill. Additionally, there is significant interest in ensuring that law enforcement continues to have access to equipment that will provide peace officers as many options as possible to safeguard lives, ensure safety, and protect civil liberties. The use of the tools identified below are vital to SPD’s mission and will continue to be strictly regulated through internal processes and oversight.

The proposed Ordinance seeks to approve SPD’s Military Equipment policy. Addendum A of the Policy outlines each item identified in Government Code section 7070, that is currently owned by the City.

The addendum also includes the current use and cost of each item. These items, and their stated uses, have been in place prior to the implementation of AB 481. Future acquisitions of any item deemed to be “military equipment” will require City Council approval and subsequent updating of the Department’s Military Equipment List and inclusion in the Annual Military Equipment Report.

The Policy safeguards the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. It ensures that there are safeguards, including transparency, oversight, and accountability measures in place. Salinas Police Department’s Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Commander will be responsible for ensuring that SPD complies with the Policy and will conduct an annual audit of military equipment. Violations of the Policy will be corrected when discovered. Members of the public are provided direction in the webpage on how to register complaints for violations. All items which result in a use of force will be investigated, as is already required by existing SPD policy.

There are no reasonable alternatives to the items listed below. SPD has not discovered alternative items that can achieve the same objectives of officer and civilian safety. Each item’s necessity is further described below:

Page | 4
 Unmanned remotely piloted powered aerial vehicle: Unmanned aerial syst ems (UAS) are necessary as they provide visibility to high-risk locations and large expansive areas. Without the use of a UAS, peace officers would have to physically enter high-risk locations which would increase the risk to the officers and members of the public. UAS are also helpful in large area searches such as during missing persons investigations. The UAS system is designed to enter small spaces, such as enclosed structures, as well as to provide overhead observations of wooded areas and other structures located in often crowded spaces. There are no known alternatives which could be used to safely access these locations.
 Unmanned remotely controlled ground vehicle: Unmanned ground robots are used for reconnaissance during critical incidents to assist in providing visibility in areas where it would be unsafe to send a peace officer. This system can also be used to communicate with distraught and potentially dangerous people without the dangers of a face -to-face confrontation. Not having access to this item would require the use of peace officers to engage in high-risk tasks.

This system can also be used during disasters to view places inaccessible by people to locate injured community members. There is no known alternative to this system.  Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) and Military ALL Terrain Vehicle (M-ATV) are used to provide ballistic protection to officers and citizens during rescue, critical incidents, and other hazardous situations. These vehicles allow officers closer access to high-risk situations while substantially reducing the physical risk to the officers and community members. These vehicles are built on commercial vehicle chassis and are primarily a reinforcement of civilian commercial vehicles. As such, there are no reasonable alternatives to providing the same level of ballistic protection.
 Command and control vehicles: The Mobile Command Vehicle (MCV) is an unarmored vehicle equivalent to a commercial recreational vehicle. It is equipped with specific communication and audio-visual devices to assist in command and control of a critical incident.

This vehicle allows for mobile incident command and use of the Incident Command Systems facilitating the best possible on scene decision-making by key leaders. It provides for mobility, sheltering, and logistical support, restroom facilities and power. There is no known alternative for the MCV which provides the same amount of mobility and support at one location in a quick deploying package. The Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) vehicle also falls into this category. It is equipped to run computer forensic examination equipment and contains an interview room.
 Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard issue shotgun ammunition: 12 gauge breaching rounds are used to defeat locked, barricaded or fortified locations allowing officers to conduct rescues or high risk forceable entries. This includes but is not limited to rescuing hostages. These items allow peace officers to quickly enter a structure when time is of the essence. This would include but not limited to an active shooter or kidnapping situation. In such situations time is of the essence and it would not be feasible to wait for other delayed access to the structure. There are alternatives which are used for low risk and/or non-fortified situations.

This includes handheld battering rams. However, this alternative does not afford the same level of protection or speed that such equipment provides when necessary. As such t here is no reasonable alternative to these items when they are used and required.

Page | 5
 Specialized firearms and ammunition including assault weapons, excluding standard issue service weapons: Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) rifles, sniper rifles and sub-machine guns enable officers when in compliance with the SPD’s Use of Force Policy, to address threats with greater accuracy and maneuverability than that of a handgun or standard issue patrol rifle, or those threats who are heavily armed, armored or both. Further, in both short and long-distance deployments, they allow officers precision shot placement minimizing the risk to officers and innocent citizens. There are no known alternatives to these weapons that will provide the same level of distance or precision.
 Any firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles: the M203 40mm launcher was originally designed to launch explosive projectiles however SPD does not use it in such a manner and does not possess explosive projectiles. This accessory is attached below the barrel of a rifle and is utilized as a less-lethal 40mm projectile launcher described below. It has a separate trigger and aiming system so lethal and less-lethal force options are not confused.

The consolidation of lethal and less-lethal force options allows the officer to be less encumbered and more maneuverable. It is primarily used to deploy some of the tear gas items listed below.

There are no known alternatives to this accessory in the manner it is used by SPD.  Light and Sound Diversion devices known as “Flashbangs”: Flashbangs are used as a distraction device in order to disorient or divert a suspect’(s) attention away from officers. This can allow officers to gain safer access to a high-risk situation, giving extra time to assess and analyze existing threats. This can prevent injury to officers and community members. These devices can often lead to a safer resolution and allow officers to take a suspect into custody without force.

There is no known alternative to a flashbang when it is necessary.  Chemical Irritants also known as “Tear gas”: Tear gas is a less lethal tool used in conjunction with de-escalation tactics when feasible. They are used to safely extract a suspect from a fixed location or safely detain a suspect who poses a risk of violence to officers. Tear gas allows peace officers to deploy a less lethal chemical irritant into a structure or specified location with an effect no other tools are capable of . The intent is to make the suspect’s environment so uncomfortable the he or she leaves the area or structure instead of sending officers into a potentially violent confrontation. These tools are less lethal and afford peace officers an added option to avoid lethal force encounters. They can also be used to address violent or riotous crowds when there is a risk of physical safety. When these items are reasonable and necessary for use, there is no other alternative.
 40mm projectile launchers: The 40mm launcher affords the ability to use less lethal chemical agents and impact munitions in conjunction with de-escalation tactics when feasible. This allows officers to address a threat from a greater distance and cover, and provides an alternative option for deadly force when reasonable. This can potentially prevent a deadly force encounter.

When necessary, there is no alternative to this less lethal weapon system.

To allow sufficient time for the community to review and respond to SPD’s Military Equipment Policy, SPD will bring this item back to City Council for the second reading of the Ordinance in August 2022.

Page | 6
POLICE COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE:

The Police Chief and Sergeant James Godwin presented this AB 481 – Military Equipment Funding, Acquisition, and Use to the Police Community Advisory Committee on March 30, 2022.

The Committee asked use-related questions and Sergeant Godwin responded that the Annual Military Equipment Report will provide usage data.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project . The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Adopting the proposed Ordinance will support the Ci ty Council’s Strategic Plan Goal of Public Safety.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Police Department and Legal Department have coordinated on the preparation of the Ordinance and legal compliance with Assembly Bill 481.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Approving the proposed Ordinance will have no direct fiscal impact on the City’s General Fund, Measure E or Measure G funds. Oversight, including administrative data collection and reporting, will be completed by existing Salinas Police Department staff.

ATTACHMENTS:

Ordinance
Assembly Bill No. 481
Salinas Police Dept Policy 709 – Military Equipment
Salinas Police Dept Policy 709 – Addendum A – Equip List ORDINANCE NO. _________(N.C.S.)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SALINAS ADDING ARTICLE III TO CHAPTER 27 OF THE

SALINAS MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 481
City Attorney Impartial Analysis
As required by Assembly Bill 481, signed into law by Governor Newsom on September 30, 2021, this Ordinance pertains to the adoption of a Military Use Policy. Pursuant to this Ordinance, the Salinas Police Department would be required to obtain the approval of the City Council, by adoption of a Military Equipment Use Policy, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of “military equipment” as defined. This Ordinance would also require similar approval for the continued use of military equipment acquired prior to January 1, 2022. The Ordinance will be subject to annual review by the City Council.

WHEREAS, On September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481 (creating Government Code section 7070, et seq.), relating to the use of military equipment by law enforcement agencies; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 481 requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body, by an ordinance adopting a “military equipment” use policy, at a regular meeting held pursuant to open meeting laws, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 481 seeks to provide transparency, oversight, and an opportunity for public input on decisions regarding whether and how military equipment is funded, acquired, or used; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 481 allows the governing body of a city to approve the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it makes specified determinations; and WHEREAS, the Salinas Police Department is in possession of certain items of equipment that qualify as “military equipment” under Assembly Bill 481; and
WHEREAS, the proposed military equipment use policy is found within Salinas Police Department Policy 709 Military Equipment; and
WHEREAS, Salinas Police Department Policy 709 Military Equipment was published on the Salinas Police Department’s internet website on March 23,2022; the Salinas Police Department Policy 709 Military Equipment was presented to City Council on March 29, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Policy and supporting information must be approved by the governing body (the City Council) by ordinance, and reviewed annually.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF SALINAS AS FOLLOWS:

2 SECTION 1: Article III is hereby added to Chapter 27 of the Salinas Municipal Code and shall read as follows:

Article III. Military Equipment Policy
Sec. 27-03.01 Military Equipment Policy.
(a) The City Council finds and determines the following:

(1) The military equipment inventoried and presented to the City Council is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety;
(2) The proposed military equipment use policy (“Policy”) will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights and civil liberties;
(3) The equipment is reasonably cost-effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety (if any); (4) Prior military equipment use complied with the applicable equipment use policy (which included equipment now defined as military equipment) that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

(b) The Salinas Police Department has submitted a proposed Policy to the City Council and has made those documents available on the Police Department’s website for at least thirty (30) days prior to the public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue.

(c) The Policy was considered by the City Council in an open session of a regular meeting, noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act. At which public comment was permitted.

(d) The Policy shall be made publicly available on the Salinas Police Department’s website for as long as the military equipment is available for use.

(e) The Salinas Police Department shall submit an annual military equipment report to the City Council, containing the information required by Government Code section 7072, and the City Council shall determine whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in (a)(1)-(4) above.

(f) The City Council shall review this ordinance, and vote on whether to renew it, on an annual basis at a regular meeting, in accordance with Government Code section 7071(e)(2).

(g) The City Council approves the use of the Policy and finds that it satisfies the requirements of Government Code section 7070(d).

3 SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such a decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases, be declared invalid.

SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective on the thirty-first day following its adoption.

This ordinance was introduced and read of the 26th day of April, 2022, and passed and adopted on the ______ of ______________________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

____________________________________
Kimble Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:

____________________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________________
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
Assembly Bill No. 481
CHAPTER 406
An act to add Chapter 12.8 (commencing with Section 7070) to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, relating to military equipment. [Approved by Governor September 30, 2021. Filed with
Secretary of State September 30, 2021.]
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 481, Chiu. Law enforcement and state agencies: military equipment:
funding, acquisition, and use.

Existing law designates the Department of General Services as the agency for the State of California responsible for distribution of federal surplus personal property, excepting food commodities, and requires the department to, among other things, do all things necessary to the execution of its powers and duties as the state agency for the distribution of federal personal surplus property, excepting food commodities, in accordance with speciﬁed federal law. Existing law, the Federal Surplus Property Acquisition Law of 1945, authorizes a local agency, as de ﬁned, to acquire surplus federal property without regard to any law which requires posting of notices or advertising for bids, inviting or receiving bids, or delivery of purchases before payment, or which prevents the local agency from bidding on federal surplus property.

Existing federal law authorizes the Department of Defense to transfer surplus personal property, including arms and ammunition, to federal or state agencies for use in law enforcement activities, subject to speciﬁed conditions, at no cost to the acquiring agency.

This bill would require a law enforcement agency, de ﬁned to include speciﬁed entities, to obtain approval of the applicable governing body, by adoption of a military equipment use policy, as speci ﬁed, by ordinance at a regular meeting held pursuant to speci ﬁed open meeting laws, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment, as deﬁned. The bill would also require similar approval for the continued use of military equipment acquired prior to January 1, 2022. The bill would allow the governing body to approve the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it determines that the military equipment meets speci ﬁed standards. The bill would require the governing body to annually review the ordinance and to either disapprove a renewal of the authorization for a type, as deﬁned, of military equipment or amend the military equipment use policy if it determines, based on an annual military equipment report prepared by the law enforcement agency, as provided, that the military equipment does not comply with the above-described standards for approval. The bill would specify these provisions do not preclude a county or local municipality from implementing 92 STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AUTHENTICATED

ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL
additional requirements and standards related to the purchase, use, and reporting of military equipment by local law enforcement agencies.

This bill would also require a state agency, as deﬁned, to create a military equipment use policy before engaging in certain activities, publish the policy on the agency’s internet website, and provide a copy of the policy to the Governor or the Governor’s designee, as speci ﬁed. The bill would also require a state agency that seeks to continue use of military equipment acquired prior to January 1, 2022, to create a military equipment use policy.

This bill would also include ﬁndings that the changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.

By adding to the duties of local of ﬁcials with respect to the funding, acquisition, and use of military equipment, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public of ﬁcials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains ﬁndings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose.

This bill would make legislative ﬁndings to that effect.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a speciﬁed reason.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. The Legislature ﬁnds and declares all of the following:
(a) The acquisition of military equipment and its deployment in our communities adversely impacts the public’s safety and welfare, including increased risk of civilian deaths, signiﬁcant risks to civil rights, civil liberties, and physical and psychological well-being, and incurment of signi ﬁcant ﬁnancial costs. Military equipment is more frequently deployed in low-income Black and Brown communities, meaning the risks and impacts of police militarization are experienced most acutely in marginalized communities.
(b) The public has a right to know about any funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment by state or local government of ﬁcials, as well as a right to participate in any government agency’s decision to fund, acquire, or use such equipment.
(c) Decisions regarding whether and how military equipment is funded, acquired, or used should give strong consideration to the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties, and should be based on meaningful public input.
92 — 2 — Ch. 406
(d) Legally enforceable safeguards, including transparency, oversight, and accountability measures, must be in place to protect the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties before military equipment is funded, acquired, or used.
(e) The lack of a public forum to discuss the acquisition of military equipment jeopardizes the relationship police have with the community, which can be undermined when law enforcement is seen as an occupying force rather than a public safety service.

SEC. 2. Chapter 12.8 (commencing with Section 7070) is added to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, to read:

Chapter 12.8. Funding, Acquisition, and Use of Military Equipment
7070. For purposes of this chapter, the following deﬁnitions shall apply:
(a) “Governing body” means the elected body that oversees a law enforcement agency or, if there is no elected body that directly oversees the law enforcement agency, the appointed body that oversees a law enforcement agency. In the case of a law enforcement agency of a county, including a sheriff’s department or a district attorney’s ofﬁce, “governing body” means the board of supervisors of the county.
(b) “Law enforcement agency” means any of the following:
(1) A police department, including the police department of a transit agency, school district, or any campus of the University of California, the California State University, or California Community Colleges. (2) A sheriff’s department.
(3) A district attorney’s ofﬁce.
(4) A county probation department.
(c) “Military equipment” means the following:
(1) Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. (2) Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are speciﬁcally excluded from this subdivision.
(3) High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), commonly referred to as Humvees, two and one-half-ton trucks, ﬁve-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. However, unarmored all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorized dirt bikes are speciﬁcally excluded from this subdivision.
(4) Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion. (5) Command and control vehicles that are either built or modi ﬁed to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. (6) Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. (7) Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, 92 Ch. 406— 3 —
or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are speci ﬁcally excluded from this subdivision.
(8) Firearms of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotguns are speciﬁcally excluded from this subdivision.
(9) Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotgun ammunition is speciﬁcally excluded from this subdivision. (10) Specialized ﬁrearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including assault weapons as de ﬁned in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard issue service weapons and ammunition of less than .50 caliber that are issued to of ﬁcers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a state agency. (11) Any ﬁrearm or ﬁrearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.
(12) “Flashbang” grenades and explosive breaching tools, “tear gas,” and “pepper balls,” excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
(13) Taser Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD).
(14) The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions: 40mm projectile launchers, “bean bag,” rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons.
(15) Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
(16) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (15), “military equipment” does not include general equipment not designated as prohibited or controlled by the federal Defense Logistics Agency.
(d) “Military equipment use policy” means a publicly released, written document governing the use of military equipment by a law enforcement agency or a state agency that addresses, at a minimum, all of the following:
(1) A description of each type of military equipment, the quantity sought, its capabilities, expected lifespan, and product descriptions from the manufacturer of the military equipment.
(2) The purposes and authorized uses for which the law enforcement agency or the state agency proposes to use each type of military equipment. (3) The ﬁscal impact of each type of military equipment, including the initial costs of obtaining the equipment and estimated annual costs of maintaining the equipment.
(4) The legal and procedural rules that govern each authorized use. (5) The training, including any course required by the Commission on Peace Ofﬁcer Standards and Training, that must be completed before any ofﬁcer, agent, or employee of the law enforcement agency or the state agency is allowed to use each speciﬁc type of military equipment to ensure the full protection of the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties and full adherence to the military equipment use policy.
(6) The mechanisms to ensure compliance with the military equipment use policy, including which independent persons or entities have oversight 92 — 4 — Ch. 406
authority, and, if applicable, what legally enforceable sanctions are put in place for violations of the policy.
(7) For a law enforcement agency, the procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each speci ﬁc type of military equipment, and how the law enforcement agency will ensure that each complaint, concern, or question receives a response in a timely manner.
(e) “State agency” means the law enforcement division of every state ofﬁce, ofﬁcer, department, division, bureau, board, and commission or other state body or agency, except those agencies provided for in Article IV (except Section 20 thereof) or Article VI of the California Constitution. (f) “Type” means each item that shares the same manufacturer model number.
7071. (a) (1) A law enforcement agency shall obtain approval of the governing body, by an ordinance adopting a military equipment use policy at a regular meeting of the governing body held pursuant to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2) or the Ralph M.

Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5), as applicable, prior to engaging in any of the following:
(A) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to Section 2576a of Title 10 of the United States Code.
(B) Seeking funds for military equipment, including, but not limited to, applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers. (C) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(D) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the territorial jurisdiction of the governing body.
(E) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body pursuant to this chapter.
(F) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of, military equipment. (G) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided by this paragraph.
(2) No later than May 1, 2022, a law enforcement agency seeking to continue the use of any military equipment that was acquired prior to January 1, 2022, shall commence a governing body approval process in accordance with this section. If the governing body does not approve the continuing use of military equipment, including by adoption pursuant to this subdivision of a military equipment use policy submitted pursuant to subdivision (b), within 180 days of submission of the proposed military equipment use policy to the governing body, the law enforcement agency shall cease its use of 92 Ch. 406— 5 —
the military equipment until it receives the approval of the governing body in accordance with this section.
(b) In seeking the approval of the governing body pursuant to subdivision (a), a law enforcement agency shall submit a proposed military equipment use policy to the governing body and make those documents available on the law enforcement agency’s internet website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue. (c) The governing body shall consider a proposed military equipment use policy as an agenda item for an open session of a regular meeting and provide for public comment in accordance with the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2) or the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5), as applicable.
(d) (1) The governing body shall only approve a military equipment use policy pursuant to this chapter if it determines all of the following:
(A) The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of ofﬁcer and civilian safety. (B) The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. (C) If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of ofﬁcer and civilian safety.
(D) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance. (2) In order to facilitate public participation, any proposed or ﬁnal military equipment use policy shall be made publicly available on the internet website of the relevant law enforcement agency for as long as the military equipment is available for use.
(e) (1) The governing body shall review any ordinance that it has adopted pursuant to this section approving the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment at least annually and, subject to paragraph (2), vote on whether to renew the ordinance at a regular meeting held pursuant to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2) or the Ralph M.

Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5), as applicable.
(2) The governing body shall determine, based on the annual military equipment report submitted pursuant to Section 7072, whether each type of military equipment identi ﬁed in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in subdivision (d). If the governing body determines that a type of military equipment identiﬁed in that annual military equipment report has not complied with the standards for approval set forth in subdivision (d), the governing body shall either disapprove a renewal of the authorization for that type of military equipment or require modiﬁcations 92 — 6 — Ch. 406
to the military equipment use policy in a manner that will resolve the lack of compliance.
(f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, if a city contracts with another entity for law enforcement services, the city shall have the authority to adopt a military equipment use policy based on local community needs.
7072. (a) A law enforcement agency that receives approval for a military equipment use policy pursuant to Section 7071 shall submit to the governing body an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The law enforcement agency shall also make each annual military equipment report required by this section publicly available on its internet website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The annual military equipment report shall, at a minimum, include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment:
(1) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use.
(2) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment.
(3) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response. (4) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report.
(5) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. (6) If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.
(b) Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing an annual military equipment report pursuant to this section, the law enforcement agency shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the law enforcement agency’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment. 7073. (a) A state agency shall create a military equipment use policy prior to engaging in any of the following:
(1) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to Section 2576a of Title 10 of the United States Code.
(2) Seeking funds for military equipment, including, but not limited to, applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers. (3) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
92 Ch. 406— 7 —
(4) Collaborating with a law enforcement agency or another state agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the territorial jurisdiction of the governing body.
(5) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body pursuant to this chapter.
(6) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, or to apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of, military equipment. (7) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided by this subdivision.
(b) No later than May 1, 2022, a state agency seeking to continue the use of any military equipment that was acquired prior to January 1, 2022, shall create a military equipment use policy.
(c) A state agency that is required to create a military equipment use policy pursuant to this section shall do both of the following within 180 days of completing the policy:
(1) Publish the military equipment use policy on the agency’s internet website.
(2) Provide a copy of the military equipment use policy to the Governor or the Governor’s designee.
7074. The Legislature ﬁnds and declares that ensuring adequate oversight of the acquisition and use of military equipment is a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, this chapter applies to all cities, including charter cities and shall supersede any inconsistent provisions in the charter of any city, county, or city and county. 7075. Nothing in this chapter shall preclude a county or local municipality from implementing additional requirements and standards related to the purchase, use, and reporting of military equipment by local law enforcement agencies.

SEC. 3. The Legislature ﬁnds and declares that Section 1 of this act, which adds Chapter 12.8 (commencing with Section 7070) to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, furthers, within the meaning of paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution, the purposes of that constitutional section as it relates to the right of public access to the meetings of local public bodies or the writings of local public ofﬁcials and local agencies. Pursuant to paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution, the Legislature makes the following ﬁndings:

Requiring local agencies to hold public meetings prior to the acquisition of military equipment further exposes that activity to public scrutiny and enhances public access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business.

SEC. 4. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district under this act would 92 — 8 — Ch. 406
result from a legislative mandate that is within the scope of paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution.

O
92 Ch. 406— 9 —
Policy
709
Salinas Police Department
Salinas PD Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/04/11, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Salinas Police Department
Military Equipment - 1
Military Equipment
709.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
709.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.

Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
• Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).
• Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

Salinas Police Department
Salinas PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/04/11, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Salinas Police Department
Military Equipment - 2
709.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Salinas Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. 709.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Salinas Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department’s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
709.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Department:

See attachment: 709 Military Equipment Addendum A.pdf
709.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):

Salinas Police Department
Salinas PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/04/11, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Salinas Police Department
Military Equipment - 3
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 709.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment should not be used by any other law enforcement agency or member in this jurisdiction unless the military equipment is approved for use in accordance with this policy. 709.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory. 709.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

Salinas PD Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/04/11, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Salinas Police Department
Attachments - 4
Attachments
Attachment
Salinas PD Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/04/11, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Salinas Police Department
709 Military Equipment Addendum A.pdf - 5
709 Military Equipment Addendum A.pdf
709 Military Equipment Addendum A.pdf
709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

1 1 . Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial vehicles. a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

DJI MAVIC MINI, Quantity: 3. This is a battery powered remote operated Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) able to record video and audio with approximately 30 minutes of flight time. Cost: $400 each.

DJI MAVIC ENTERPRISE DUAL, Quantity: 7. This is a battery powered remote operated UAS able to record video with approximately 30 minutes of flight time. It is equipped with color and infrared camera, audio speaker, and light. Cost $5,500 each

DJI M300 with HT20, Quantity: 1. This is a battery powered remote operated UAS able to record video with approximately 45 minutes of flight time. It can be operated in inclement weather and is equipped with an infrared camera, zoom camera, and light. Cost $25,000.

SKYDIO2, Quantity: 1. This is a battery powered remote operated UAS able to record video with approximately 25 minutes of flight time. It is equipped with a color camera. Cost $1,200.

EMAX TINYHAWK, Quantity: 1. This is a battery powered remote operated UAS able to record video with approximately 5 minutes of flight time. Cost $250.

BRINC LEMUR, Quantity: 1. This is a battery powered remote operated UAS that records video and audio with approximately 30 minutes of flight time. Cost $17,000.

DJI MAVIC AIR 2, Quantity: 1. This is a battery powered remote operated UAS that records video with approximately 30 minutes of flight time. Cost $1,200. b. Purpose:

To be used when its view would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations:
i. Public safety and life preservation missions including, barricaded suspects, hostage situations, active shooters, apprehension of armed and dangerous fleeing suspects, and high-risk search warrants;
ii. Mass casualty events;
iii. Lost or missing persons;
iv. Rescue events;
v. Disaster response and recovery;
vi. Suspected explosive devices;
vii. Post-incident crime scene preservation and documentation; viii. Pursuant to a search warrant;
ix. Special Events;
709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

2 x. When there is probable cause to believe that the UAS will record images of a place, thing, condition, or event, and that those images tend to show a felony has been committed, or tends to show that a particular person has committed a felony;
xi. Anytime a UAS would enhance public safety, improve operational safety, incident stabilization or incident mitigation as determined by the authorizing person;
xii. Anti-UAV operations when a person is operating a UAV in a manner which impedes emergency personnel who, in the course of their duties, are coping with an emergency (refer to Penal Code § 402(a)(2);
xiii. Training missions;
xiv. In support of the Salinas Fire Department when the underlying mission meets the uses outlined in this policy; and
xv. Mutual Aid support when the underlying mission meets the uses outlined in this policy.
c. Expected Lifespan:
3-5 years for all UAS.
d. Fiscal impact:

Annual maintenance and battery replacement cost is approximately $13,000 total. e. Authorized Use:

It is the policy of the Salinas Police Department to utilize UAS only for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy or our community, pursuant to state and Federal law. Applicable department policies include but are not limited to 322 Search and Seizure, 332 Missing Persons, 615 Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations, and FAA Regulation 14 CFR Part 107. f. Training:

All department UAS operators are licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration for UAS operation. In addition, each operator must attend a 20-hour department training and ongoing bi-monthly training.

1 . Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered ground vehi cles. a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

ROBOTEX AVATAR TACTICAL ROBOT, Quantity: 1. This is a battery powered, remote operated, heavy-duty tactical robot, with one fixed camera to the front and moveable dome camera on the top, and two-way radio. It allows officers to view and inspect dangerous locations from a position of safety and communicate with any people it encounters and enhance the safety of officers and the community. Cost $30,000

RECON ROBOTICS RECON SCOUT XT AND THROWBOT 2, Quantity: 2 This is a battery powered, remote operated robot that can be thrown into hazardous situations and crawl over terrain and small obstacles. It has real time video and audio capabilities. It allows officers to view and inspect dangerous locations top quickly 709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

3 make informed decisions and enhance the safety of officers and the community. Cost $30,000
b. Purpose:

To be used during critical incidents by SWAT members to remotely gain visual/audio information, deliver Hostage Negotiations phone, open doors, locate barricaded subjects, clear buildings/houses, and increase safety for officers and the community during critical incidents.
c. Expected Lifespan:
10-15 years
d. Fiscal impact:

Annual maintenance and battery replacement are approximately $2,000 total. e. Authorized Use:

Only assigned operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate a robot. Use is authorized by the Incident or Tactical commander.

Applicable department policies include but are not limited to 322 Search and Seizure and 408 SWAT / HNT.
f. Training:

SWAT officers receive a day of in-house training and regular practical training on the capabilities and operation of robots.

2. Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles .
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

INTERNATIONAL MAXXPRO MRAP, Quantity: 1. This vehicle is an armored vehicle that seats up to 10 personnel with an open floorplan that allows for rescue of personnel. It can stop various projectiles, which provides greater safety to residents and officers beyond the protection level of handheld shields and personal body armor.

Cost $0

OSHKOSH MRAP M-ATV, Quantity: 1. This vehicle is an armored vehicle that seats four personnel with a robust suspension, which allows for an emergency response to almost any situation. It can stop various projectiles, which provides greater safety to residents and officers beyond the protection level of handheld shields or personal body armor. Cost $0.
b. Purpose:

To be used in response to critical incidents to enhance officer and community safety by providing ballistic protection, vehicle-based rescue operations, and use in rough terrain which can limit equipment availability.
c. Expected lifespan:
15 years remain for each.
d. Fiscal impact:

Annual maintenance $2,600 each.
e. Authorized Use:
709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

4 The use of armored vehicles shall only be authorized by a Watch Commander or SWAT Commander based on circumstances of a given critical incident. Armored vehicles shall be used only by officers trained in their deployment and in a manner consistent with department Policy and training. The Department shall utilize armored vehicles only for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal Law. Applicable department policies include but are not limited to 408 SWAT / HNT and 706 Vehicle Use.
f. Training:

All driver/operators are licensed by The Department of Motor Vehicles with Class B airbrake endorsement. They attend formalized instruction on these vehicles’ operation and receive practical driving instruction in preparation for the license examination.

5. Command and Control vehicles that are either bu ilt or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction o f public safety units. a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

INTERNATIONAL 4300 by SVI Trucks, Quantity:1 This is a custom-built Mobile Command Vehicle equipped with mobile computer terminals, a police radio, desks, and a kitchen area with sink, refrigerator, microwave, and a restroom. It has an adjustable color camera with zoom capabilities. Cost $389,469. b. Purpose:

This vehicle is used during special events and major prolonged incidents where a command post is beneficial to support and control law enforcement activities. c. Expected lifespan:

This vehicle was purchased in 2005 and lifespan is determined by the amount of use, which is infrequent. Estimated to be 20+ years. Information Technology (IT) may have to be upgraded in the future.
d. Fiscal impact:

Annual maintenance cost is approximately $700.
e. Authorized Use:

Use of the MCV may be authorized by the Watch Commander or an Incident Commander during pre-planned events or other times a command post may be beneficial to further a legitimate law enforcement purpose. Applicable department policies include but are not limited to 322 Search and Seizure and 706 Vehicle Use. f. Training:

Operation of this vehicle only requires a standard driver’s license. Users are required to participate in a two-hour department approved familiarization and practical driving training.

5 Ford F-550 van by LDV Inc., Quantity: 1. This is a custom-built vehicle designated for use by the Internet Crimes Against Children (ICIC) task force. The vehicle is equipped to run computer forensic examination equipment and contains an interview room which can be audio and video recorded. Cost $195,722 which was reimbursed by the ICAC grant program.
b. Purpose:

This vehicle is used as part of a county-wide task force to aid in the response to technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and internet crimes against children. c. Expected lifespan:
15 years
d. Fiscal impact:

The ICAC vehicle is new and has not been serviced. Estimated annual maintenance cost $400 would consist of common preventative maintenance all vehicles require. e. Authorized Use:

Use of the ICAC vehicle may be authorized by an Investigations Unit supervisor when its capabilities may be useful to further a legitimate law enforcement purpose.

Applicable department policies include but are not limited to 322 Search and seizure and 706 Vehicle Use.
f. Training:

Operation of this vehicle only requires a standard driver’s license. There is no special training required to operate this vehicle. There is a familiarization session with ICAC investigators regarding functionality.

9. Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY T.K.O. FRANGIBLE BREACHING ROUND,
Quantity: 60. This is a 12-gauge shotgun round designed to defeat door hinges and locking mechanisms to be used with a special attachment to the barrel. Frangible rounds disintegrate upon impact making penetration through a barrier less likely.

FEDERAL DOOR BREACHING ROUND, Quantity: 60. This is a 12-gauge shotgun round designed to defeat door hinges and locking mechanisms to be used with a special attachment to the barrel. Frangible rounds disintegrate upon impact making penetration through a barrier less likely.
b. Purpose:

To quickly defeat locked doors in situations where delay would be dangerous to offices or residents such as an active shooter situation. c. Expected lifespan:

Specialty ammunition such as breaching rounds generally have a five-year guarantee. d. Fiscal impact:
709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

6 Both shotgun rounds are approximately $4-5 each depending on market availability and demand. Replacement cost is $480-600 quinquennially or $96-120 annually. e. Authorized Use:

Breaching shotgun rounds are only available to SWAT and specialty units such as the Violence Suppression Task Force and then only to trained officers. Except for emergency situations, use of this ammunition is authorized by the Incident Commander or SWAT Commander. Applicable department policies include but are not limited to 300 Use of Force and 312 Firearms.
f. Training:

A shotgun breaching firearms training course is required before officers can use this ammunition.

10. Specialized firearms and ammunition of less th an .50 caliber including assault weapons as designed in sections 30510 and 3055 of the Penal Code.
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

COLT M16-A1, Quantity: 30. This is a military rifle modified by the Salinas Police Department range staff to only shoot semi-automatic. Its appearance would be recognizable to the public as an AR-15. Originally obtained to be used as patrol rifles, they have not been issued to officers or used in any way for several years. The rifles belong to the U.S. government and SPD intends to return them to the Defense Logistics Agency. Cost $0.

DANIEL DEFENSE MK18, Quantity: 26. This is a rifle that in appearance would be recognizable to the public as an AR-15. This rifle is chambered in 5.56 and only issued to qualified SWAT members. It has a shorter barrel than a standard issue patrol rifle making it easier to maneuver and control inside structures with greater accuracy than a handgun. Cost $1,485 each.

HECKLER & KOCH MP-5, Quantity: 3. This is a sub-machinegun chambered in 9mm. A short barrel firearm which allows a trained officer better control inside of a structure with greater accuracy than a handgun. The officer that uses this firearm is typically a properly trained SWAT member or former SWAT member. Cost $1,380 each.

SIG SAUER MPX, Quantity: 2. This is a sub-machinegun chambered in 9mm. A short barrel firearm which allows a trained officer better control inside of a structure with greater accuracy than a handgun. The officer that uses this firearm is typically a properly trained SWAT member or former SWAT member. Cost $1,850 each.

709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

7 AERO PRECISION LLC AR-10, Quantity: 1. This is a semi-automatic rifle chambered in .308 and is used by SWAT snipers in high-risk situations. Its appearance is that of an AR-15 but has the capability to reach farther distances with greater accuracy due to the ammunition it fires. Cost $0.

DANIEL DEFENSE DD5 AR-10, Quantity: 1. This is a semi-automatic rifle chambered in .308 and is used by SWAT snipers in high-risk situations. Its appearance is that of an AR-15 but has the capability to reach farther distances with greater accuracy due to the ammunition it fires. Cost $0.

REMINGTON 700, Quantity: 4. This is a bolt action long-range rifle chambered in .308 issued to SWAT sniper teams for high-risk situations. It is designed for precision shot placement. This rifle is more accurate at greater distances than an AR-15 style rifle. Cost $900 each.

REMINGTON 700, Quantity: 1. This is a bolt action long-range rifle chambered in .338 issued to SWAT sniper teams. It is designed for precision shot placement. The .338 rifle round has greater power and velocity than a .308 rifle round. Cost $0.

HORNADAY .308 168GR RIFLE ROUND, Quantity, 600. This is the approved rifle round for duty use in .308 rifles. Cost $125 per case of 100.

HORNARDAY .338 285GR RIFLE ROUND, Quantity, 100. This is the approved rifle round for duty use in .338 rifles. Cost $630 per case of 100. b. Purpose:

The Salinas Police Department equips its members with firearms to address the risks posed to the public and department members by violent and sometimes well-armed persons. These firearms are to be used as precision weapons to address a threat with more precision and/or at greater distances than a handgun. c. Expected lifespan:

Colt M-16A1 are at the end of their expected lifespan but most still function although not issued, maintained, or used.

Daniel Defense MK18 have a 15-year lifespan.

Heckler & Koch MP-5 have a 20+ year lifespan determined by maintenance.

Sig Sauer MPX have a 20-year lifespan.

Aero Precision LLC have a 20-year lifespan.

Daniel Defense DD5 have a 20-year lifespan.
709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

8 Remington 700 have a 20-year lifespan.

Ammunition is good until used.
d. Fiscal impact:

Annual maintenance of each firearm is approximately $50.

Ammunition is used regularly during training and is replaced after use. Cost is approximately $1,000 annually.
e. Authorized Use:

The use of deadly force is only justified when the officer reasonably believes it is necessary in the following circumstances (Penal Code 835a)  An officer may use deadly force to protect him/herself or others from what he/she reasonably believes is an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to the officer or another person.
 An officer may use deadly force to apprehend a fleeing person for any felony that threatened or resulted in death or serious bodily injury, if the officer reasonably believes that the person will cause serious bodily injury to another person unless immediately apprehended.

Use of these firearms by personnel is authorized so long as the user has completed approved training and has maintained qualification requirements. It is the policy of SPD to utilize firearms only for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to state and federal laws. Applicable department policies include but are not limited to 300 Use of Force and 312 Firearms.
f. Training:

Prior to using an AR-15 style firearm on duty, officers must attend a POST rifle school.

SWAT officers are required to attend a POST approved SWAT school that includes range training.

SWAT officers and snipers train with their firearms monthly.

Officers must attend a submachine gun school prior to using a submachine gun on duty.

11. Any firearm accessory that is designed to laun ch explosive projectiles. a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

LEWIS MACHINE & TOOL (LMT) M203 40MM LAUNCHER, Quantity: 2. This accessory is listed in this section because it was designed to launch explosive projectiles, however it is utilized in the same manner as items identified in section 14 “40mm launchers,” below. The Salinas Police Department does not possess explosive 709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

9 projectiles. The M203 launcher is a firearm attachment utilized in such a way to consolidate less lethal and lethal force options. It mounts under the barrel of a rifle and has a separate trigger and aiming system. This launcher is primarily intended to deliver less lethal chemical agent containers.
b. Purpose:

To limit the escalation of conflict by the use of less lethal options in conjunction with de-escalation tactics when feasible. The 40mm launcher is exclusively used as a less lethal force option for both kinetic energy projectiles and chemical agents. c. Expected lifespan:
25 years but can vary greatly depending on use including practice and training. d. Fiscal impact:

Annual maintenance is approximately $50 each.
e. Authorized Use:
f. The use of force by law enforcement personnel is a matter of critical concern, both to the public and to the law enforcement community. Officers are involved on a daily basis in numerous and varied interactions and, when warranted, may use reasonable force in carrying out their duties.

In order to control subject who are violent or who demonstrate the intent to be violent, The Salinas Police Department authorizes officers to use Control Devices in accordance with policy.

Kinetic energy projectiles when used properly, are less likely to result in death or serious physical injury and can be used to de-escalate a potentially deadly situation.

Circumstances appropriate for deployment include, but are not limited to, situations in which:
(a) A specific person is armed with a weapon and the tactical circumstances allow for the safe application of approved munitions.
(b) A specific person has made credible threats to harm him/herself or others. (c) A specific person is engaged in riotous behavior or is throwing rocks, bottles or other dangerous projectiles at people and/or officers. (d) There is probable cause to believe that a specific person has already committed a crime of violence and is refusing to comply with lawful orders.

Kinetic energy projectiles and chemical agents for crowd control purposes shall only be deployed by officers who have received POST training for crowd control if the use is objectively reasonable to defend against a threat to life or serious bodily injury to any individual, including an officer, or to bring an objectively dangerous and unlawful situation safely and effectively under control (Penal Code § 13652).

Tear gas may be used for crowd control, crowd dispersal or against barricaded suspects based on the circumstances. Only the Watch Commander, Incident Commander or SWAT / HNT Commander may authorize the delivery and use of tear gas.
709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

10 Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) may be used on a person or group of people who are engaging in, or about to engage in violent behavior. OC should not be used against people or groups who merely fail to disperse or do not reasonably appear to present a risk to the safety of officers or the public.

Applicable policies include but are not limited to 300 Use of Force, 308 Control Devices and Techniques, and 309 Conducted Energy Device. g. Training:

To use less lethal kinetic energy projectiles, officers are required to attend a department approved training.

To use less lethal chemical irritants, officers are required to attend a department approved chemical irritant school.

12. Distraction Devices “flashbang grenades”
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS 7290M MINI FLASH-BANG, Quantity: 63.

This is a non-bursting, non-fragmenting device that produces a loud thunderous bang (175db) with an intense bright light (6-8 million candelas). Cost $36.40 each.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS 7290-3 FLASH-BANG, Quantity: 23. This is a non-bursting, non-fragmenting multi-bang device that produces a loud thunderous bang (175db) with an intense bright light (6-8 million candelas). This is similar to the 7290M, however it produces three sequential bangs. Ideal for use inside a large structure. Cost $103.31 each.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS 7290-7 FLASH-BANG, Quantity: 11. This is a non-bursting, non-fragmenting, multi-bang device that produces a loud thunderous bang (175db) with an intense bright light (6-8 million candelas). This is similar to the 7290M, however it produces seven sequential bangs. Ideal for use inside a large structure. Cost $128.25 each.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, 7290MT/7290T TRAINING MINI FLASH- BANG TRAINING BODIES, Quantity 14. Both training systems are used to facilitate realistic training scenarios. They are built and weigh the same as the model 7290M and 7290. The body is painted bright blue and use is unlimited. Cost $56.10 each.

709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

11 COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, 201FB TRAINING FUZES RELOAD, Quantity: 24. The fuse is inserted into the training body and produces a loud bang.

These are used during training only. Cost $13.60 each
b. Purpose:

This device is ideal for distracting dangerous people during high-risk situations during SWAT operations.
c. Expected lifespan:

Single use, good until used.
d. Fiscal impact:

There are no associated maintenance costs, units are replaced upon use. On average, 20 devices are used during SWAT operations and another 20 training fuses per year.

Annual replacement cost is approximately $1,000 total.
e. Authorized Use:

The use of force by law enforcement personnel is a matter of critical concern, both to the public and to the law enforcement community. Officers are involved on a daily basis in numerous and varied interactions and, when warranted, may use reasonable force in carrying out their duties.

Except in emergencies (i.e. life threatening situations), light/sound diversionary devices shall not be used without prior authorization of the Tactical Commander or Team Leader.
i. Generally, light/sound diversionary devices may be considered whenever the use of a diversion would help facilitate entry, enabling arrest and potentially reducing the risk of injury.
ii. Circumstances for the use of light/sound diversionary devices shall include, but be not limited to:
 Barricaded suspect and/or hostage situations
 High-Risk warrant services
 To distract a violent person, mentally deranged persons or persons believed to be under the influence of alcohol/drugs and necessary to facilitate apprehension.
 When the Tactical Commander or Team Leader deems their use necessary to safely resolve an incident.
iii. Prior to deploying light/sound diversionary devices, SWAT personnel shall consider all available intellige nce information and circumstances (i.e. presence of small children o r elderly persons, etc.).

Circumstances may dictate that deployment of the device inside the objective is not an option. In these circumstanc es deployment will occur outside of the objective.
iv. In all cases, light/sound diversionary devic es shall be deployed in an area visible to the deploying officer. The deploying officer will not throw the device at anyone.
709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

12 v. Due to the fact light/sound diversionary devi ces have the potential to ignite flammable materials, a portable fire exti nguisher should be readily accessible whenever these devices are deployed. In any situation a light/sound diversionary device is deployed, all S.W.A.T. members in the area should wear Nomex hoods and gloves.
vi. Generally, these devices will not be used solely for the preservation of evidence.
vii. The Tactical Commander shall review the use of light/sound diversionary devices, as soon as practical, following each in cident or operation to ensure the devices were used according to policy and that the devices functioned properly. All information obtained sh all be used for statistical and training purposes.

Applicable department policies include but are not limited to 300 Use of Force.
f. Training:

Prior to use, officers must attend diversionary device training conducted by a POST certified instructor. This occurs during basic SWAT school and another half-day of in-house training.

12. Chemical Irritants “Tear Gas”
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS 5230B CS BALLFED CANISTER
GRENADE, Quantity:65. This is a pyrotechnic grenade designed for indoor use delivering a maximum amount of irritant smoke throughout multiple rooms with minimal risk of fire. Irritant is chlorobenzalmalononitrile (CS). Cost $32.41 each.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS 5230JL CS JET LITE CANISTER
GRENADE, Quantity: 63. This is a burning grenade designed to rapidly discharge a high volume of smoke and chemical irritant. Due to combustion risk, it should not be used on rooftops, crawl spaces, or indoors. Irritant is chlorobenzalmalononitrile (CS).

Cost $34.63 each.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS 5430 CS FLAMELESS EXPULSION
CANISTER GRENADE, Quantity: 20. This is a flameless grenade that poses no risk of fire. It discharges a large amount of powder and is most effective indoors. Irritant is chlorobenzalmalononitrile (CS). Cost $38.71 each.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS 6230 CANISTER GRENADE, Quantity: 14.

This is a pyrotechnic grenade that emits smoke and chemical irritant for approximately 30-40 seconds. Irritant is chlorobenzalmalononitrile (CS). Cost $23.88 each.

709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

13 COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS 6343 OC/CS VAPOR GRENADE, Quantity:

5. This device delivers an invisible vapor. It is most effective indoors. Irritant is a combination of Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) and chlorobenzalmalononitrile (CS). Cost $35.12 each.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS 4330 CS LIQUID BARRICADE SPIN STABILIZED 40MM, Quantity: 140. This Liquid CS filled projectile penetrates intermediate barriers and delivers irritant agents into an adjacent room. Irritant is chlorobenzalmalononitrile (CS) and is deployed using a 40mm launching system.

Cost 22.20 each.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS 1947 OC VAPOR MK-9, Quantity 9. This is a cannister that delivers an invisible vapor of chemical irritant and is most effective when used indoors. Irritant is Oleoresin Capsicum (OC). Cost 45.30 each b. Purpose:

To limit the escalation of conflict by the use of less lethal options in conjunction with de-escalation tactics when feasible. The use of chemical irritants are an option that can be selected in the goal of protection of life and property and/or restoration of order. Generally, the option to deploy chemical irritants will be exercised after the suspect has been given numerous opportunities to surrender, the Tactical Commander is satisfied that negotiations have been exhausted, and that further communication with the suspect will not result in the suspects' surrender.

The deployment of this less lethal option is intended to resolve the situation without creating a confrontation between the police and the suspect. In using chemical irritants, the intent is to make the suspect's environment so uncomfortable that he/she seeks to exit the structure or vehicle and is taken into custody by an arrest team. It is never the intent of the Salinas Department to injure or punish the suspect by using these devices. The suspect's failure to surrender has created the need for this option. c. Expected lifespan:

Tear Gas devices have a five-year shelf life.
d. Fiscal impact:

Tear Gas devices are replaced after use or at the expiration of their shelf life. SPD cannot reasonably predict when use of these devices will occur. Total quinquennial replacement cost $9,088.16 or $1,817.63 annual.
e. Authorized Use:

709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

14 Tear gas may be used for crowd control, crowd dispersal or against barricaded suspects based on the circumstances. Only the Watch Commander, Incident Commander or SWAT / HNT Commander may authorize the delivery and use of tear gas.

Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) may be used on a person or group of people who are engaging in, or about to engage in violent behavior. OC should not be used against people or groups who merely fail to disperse or do not reasonably appear to present a risk to the safety of officers or the public.

SPD SWAT Standard Operating Procedures:

Prior to deployment, the Tactical Commander and Team Leader should consider the evacuation of the area around the objective site that may be affected by the application of the chemical agents. Command personnel should insure, within reason , there are no infants, ill, or physically mentally or emotionally disabled people in the specified deployment area.

The team member(s) assigned to deploy the chemical irritants will develop a Chemical Agents Deployment Plan which will explain how much irritant will be used, where it will be introduced and how it will be deployed (except during Emergency Gas Deployment). These team members will then present the plan to the Team Leader and Tactical Commander.

Prior to deployment, both team members will inspect the munitions to avoid confusion or errors. Once the Chemical Irritant Deployment Team(s) are in place, they will advise the Team Leader. The Team Leader will advise them when to deploy the munitions and this order will be repeated by the Chemical Irritants Deployment Team to eliminate any confusion.

When practicable, fire personnel should be alerted or summoned to the scene prior to the deployment of tear gas to control any fires and to assist in providing medical aid or gas evacuation if needed.

Applicable department policies include but are not limited to 300 Use of Force and 308 Control Devices and Techniques.
f. Training:

Members must attend a department approved chemical irritant school to participate on the Chemical Irritant Deployment Team.

14. 40mm projectile launchers and projectiles.
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

PENN ARMS PUMP 40MM MULTI-LAUNCHER P540-1, Quantity 11 (9 patrol and 2 SWAT). This is a 40mm projectile launcher designed to operate similar to a 709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

15 long-gun with a six-shot capacity. This launcher is primarily used for the deployment of the CTS 4557 Baton Round. Cost $3,400

PENN ARMS 40MM SINGLE LAUNCHER L140-4, Quantity: 4. This is a 40mm projectile launcher designed to operate similar to a long-gun with one shot capacity used for the deployment of 40mm chemical agent containers.

PENN ARMS CTS 4557 FOAM BATON ROUND, Quantity: 400. This is a less lethal kinetic energy projectile made of foam and plastic. These can be used as an impact weapon similar to a baton but at a distance and from a position of cover to limit additional risks to officers and residents. They can also be used to disable lights and surveillance cameras or break windows from a distance to provide extra protection to officers during critical incidents. Cost $19.09 each.

PENN ARMS CTS 4557 RELOAD KIT, Quantity: 12 cases (120 rounds). This is a less expensive projectile used for training. Cost $1,551.00 per case ($12.925 each). b. Purpose:

To limit the escalation of conflict by the use of less lethal options in conjunction with de-escalation tactics when feasible. The 40mm launcher is exclusively used as a less lethal force option for both kinetic energy projectiles and chemical agents. c. Expected lifespan:
25 years for 40mm launchers but can vary greatly depending on use, including practice and training.

Foam Baton Rounds have a five-year shelf life and reload kits for training are good until used.
d. Fiscal impact:

Annual maintenance is approximately $50 per launcher.

Foam baton rounds are replaced when used. Annually, an average of 5-30 are used as a less lethal force option. Use for non-force tasks such as disabling a light have not been accurately tracked. Replacing 100 foam baton rounds is likely an overestimate but costs $1,909.

Reload Kits are used for training. A minimum of 12 rounds are used per officer during initial training and six rounds are used per officer per year for qualification.

Approximately 1,000 per year for a cost of $12,925.
e. Authorized Use:

In order to control subject(s) who are violent or who demonstrate the intent to be violent, The Salinas Police Department authorizes officers to use Control Devices in accordance with policy.

709 Military Equipment
Addendum A

16 The use of force by law enforcement personnel is a matter of critical concern, both to the public and to the law enforcement community. Officers are involved on a daily basis in numerous and varied interactions and, when warranted, may use reasonable force in carrying out their duties.

Kinetic energy projectiles when used properly, are less likely to result in death or serious physical injury and can be used in an attempt to de-escalate a potentially deadly situation. Circumstances appropriate for deployment include, but are not limited to, situations in which:
(a) The person is armed with a weapon and the tactical circumstances allow for the safe application of approved munitions.
(b) The person has made credible threats to harm him/herself or others. (c) The person is engaged in riotous behavior or is throwing rocks, bottles or other dangerous projectiles at people and/or officers.
(d) There is probable cause to believe that the person has already committed a crime of violence and is refusing to comply with lawful orders.

Applicable department policies include 300 Use of Force, 308 Control Devices and Techniques, and 309 Conducted Energy Device.
f. Training:

To use 40mm less lethal kinetic energy projectiles, officers are required to attend department approved training.

To use less lethal chemical irritants including those delivered by 40mm projectile launchers, officers are required to attend a department approved chemical irritant school.