Agenda Packet — Salinas City Council, December 13, 2022 (part 3 of 4)

RESOLUTION NO. ______
City of Salinas

A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ADDITONAL RAPID RE-HOUSING

FUNDING AND THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT AMENDMENT AND
ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO FROM THE 2020-2021 FUNDING YEAR
OF THE STATE ESG PROGRAM, CONTINUUM OF CARE ALLOCATION.

A necessary quorum and majority of the council members of City of Salinas, a municipality (“Applicant”) hereby consent to, adopt and ratify the following resolution:

A. WHEREAS the State of California (the “State”), Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) issued a Notice of Funding Availability (“NOFA”) for the Continuum of Care Allocation dated October 2, 2020, under the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program (Program, or ESG Program); and B. WHEREAS Applicant is an approved state ESG Administrative SECTION 1:

Applicant is an approved Applicant by their Continuum of Care under the Continuum of Care Allocation and is hereby authorized and directed to receive an ESG grant, in an amount not to exceed $4,372,100 in accordance with all applicable rules and laws.

SECTION 2:

The Department may approve funding allocations for the ESG Program, subject to the terms and conditions of the NOFA, Program regulations, and the Standard Agreement.

The Applicant acknowledges compliance with all state and federal public participation requirements in the development of its applications.

SECTION 3:

If applicant receives a grant of ESG funds from the Department pursuant to the above referenced ESG NOFA, it represents and certifies that it will use all such funds in a manner consistent and in compliance with all applicable state and federal statutes, rules, regulations, and laws, including without limitation all rules and laws regarding the ESG Program, as well as any and all other contracts Applicant may have with the Department.

Page 2 of 2 ends

SECTION 4:

The Applicant hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager, or designee, to execute and deliver all applications and act on the Applicant’s behalf in all matters pertaining to all such applications.

SECTION 5:

If an application is approved, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to enter into, execute and deliver the grant agreement (i.e., Standard Agreement) and any and all subsequent amendments thereto with the State of California for the purposes of the grant.

SECTION 6:

If an application is approved, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to sign and submit Funds Requests and all required reporting forms and other documentation as may be required by the State of California from time to time in connection with the grant.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Salinas held on this 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: NOES:

ABSENT: ABSTAIN:

Kimbley Craig, Mayor

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
City of Salinas

I, Patricia M. Barajas , City Clerk of the City of Salinas, State of California, hereby certify the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by said City Council on this 13th day of December, 2022.

By: __________________________
Patricia M. Barajas
City Clerk of the City of Salinas, State of California

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-681, Version: 1
Application to Participate in the California Department of Housing and Community Development Prohousing Designation Program
Approve a Resolution authorizing the submission of an application to participate in the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Prohousing Designation Program (PDP); and authorizing the Mayor or designee, for an on behalf of the City, to execute and enter into any agreements, documents or amendments required or deemed necessary or appropriate by HCD to participate in the PDP.

City of Salinas Printed on 12/7/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2022
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DE VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FROM: MEGAN HUNTER, DIRECTOR
THROUGH: ROD POWELL, PLANNING MANAGER
LUIS OCHOA, SR. COMM UNITY DEVELOPMENT ANALYST

BY: DAVID VIGIL, HOUS ING PRODUCTION COORDINATOR VISTA TITLE: APPLICATION TO PART ICIPATE IN THE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT PROHOUSING DESINGATION PROGRAM

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing:

1. The submission of an application to particip ate in the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s Prohousing Designation Program; and

2. The Mayor or designee, for and on behalf of the City, to execute and enter into any agreements, documents or amendments require d or deemed necessary or appropriate by HCD for participation in the Prohousing Designation Program.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City is seeking to become the first Central Coast jurisd iction accepted to HCD’s Prohousing Designation Program. PDP inclusions would dem onstrate the City’s firm commitment to the accelerated production of housing based upon th e implementation of strategic, prohousing planning principles. Inclusion in the PDP will pr ovide the City with a scoring advantage and/or preference in emerging and competitive applic ations for critical a ffordable housing and infrastructure grant programs, including the Affordable Hous ing and Sustainable Communities Program (AHSC), Transformative Climate Communities Program (TCC), and Infill Infrastructure Grant Program (IIG), as well as potential fu ture advantages and opportunities involving both housing and non-housing funding sources. Approval of the proposed Resolution will authorize the submission of a City of Salinas to the Ca lifornia Department of Housing and Community Development Prohousing Designation Program.

Page | 2
BACKGROUND:

The PDP originates from the 2019-2020 Budge t Act under Assembly Bill 101 Housing Development and Financing. In response to calls for immediate action to address the State’s housing crisis, the legislature tasked HCD w ith establishing and administering a Prohousing Designation Program to enable jurisdictions that have adopte d local measures, programs and incentives that go beyond existing state law to encourage and facilitate the development of housing within its jurisdiction. To apply, jurisdictions mu st be in compliance with State housing laws, Housing Element requirements, and annual require d reporting. In return, successfully designated jurisdictions are provided with incentives such as additional points or other preferences in the scoring of competitive housing and infrastructure grant programs such as the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program (AHSC), Transformative Climate Communities Program (TCC), Infill Infrastructure Grant Program (IIG), and Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP).

DISCUSSION:

To qualify for a prohousing designation, the City must submit a completed PDP application for HCD review involving four, sepa rate scoring categories: (1) fa vorable zoning and land use, (2) acceleration of housing production timeframes, (3 ) reduction of construction and development costs and (4) provision of financial subsidies towards housing projects.

Application threshold
requirements include the implementation of at least one, housing-supportive policy in each of the four categories and a cumulative score of no less than thirty (30) points of the maximum available total of sixty (60).

The City’s most recent Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) has significantly increased its obligations to accommodate the developm ent of nearly 7,000 additional housing units.

Considering this new RHNA allocation and the City's objectives for neighborhood preservation, housing production, and housing assistance, finding new sources of local, state, and federal funds for affordable housing projects is of vital importance to the City. PDP designation would serve as an important tool to attract and encourage housing development within the City and provides a competitive advantage in seeking and securing additional housing production-related funding.

In consultation with HCD staff, Community De velopment Department (CDD) Housing Division staff have drafted a complete PDP application citing the City’s qualifying policies, programs, and initiatives in each of the four required scoring categories. An initial ‘self- score’ of the application garners 53 points, well above the program’s minimum 30-point designation threshold. Staff have also proactively consulted and sought input from HCD PDP staff to obtain a preliminary review of the City’s application and have incorporated each of the re commended revisions into the final draft.

PDP applications are accepted on an open, rollin g basis. Upon submission, HCD will have sixty (60) days to review and notify the City, in writing, of its final determination. Unsuccessful applicants may continue to consult with PDP staf f and seek to further de velop and refine their jurisdictional policies, programs, and incentives in order to meet designation standards to support resubmission of an application.

Page | 3
CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determin ed that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Obtaining PDP designation will advance the City of Salinas Strategic Plan 2022-2025 Goals and Strategies of Housing/Affordable Housing, Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, and Effective and Culturally Responsive Government.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Prohousing Designation Program Application and Council materials were prepared by CDD’s Housing and Community Development Division in consultation with CDD’s Current Planning, Planning and Project Implementa tion, and Permit Services Divisions, and the Public Works Department.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Submission of a PDP applicati on has no financial impact. Once approved as a designated PDP jurisdiction, the City would be afforded future opportunities to compete for and secure additional funding.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
State HCD PDP Resolution
City of Salinas Prohousing Designation Program Application – Draft PPT – HCD PDP Application

RESOLUTION NO.__________ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITAL OF A PROHOUSING

DESIGNATION PROGRAM APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD) AND PARTICIPATION

IN THE PROHOUSING DESINGATION PROGRAM

WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (PDP), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and

WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has adopted emergency regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the PDP, as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and

WHEREAS, jurisdictions demonstrating PDP application threshold requirements will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of competitive applications for both specified housing and infrastructure funding and potential, future non-housing funding; and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas is currently in compliance with applicable state housing laws, has a current Housing Element, diligently submits required annual reporting, and is therefore eligible to apply; and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constr ain housing production and further acknowledges and confirms that it commits itself to affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50; and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas shall be subject to the application: the terms and conditions specified in the Prohousing Designation Program documents; the Prohousing Designation Program regulations: and any and all other applicable laws; and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas desires to submit an application for acceptance into the PDP;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes the submission of a City PDP application to the HCD and authorizes its full participation in the PDP; and

NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes the Mayor or designee to execute and enter into any documents and/or agreements, including future amendments, required or deemed necessary or appropriate by HCD to participate in the Prohousing Designation Program.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

_____________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF

THE CITY OF SALINAS

AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE PROHOUSING

DESIGNATION PROGRAM

WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“PDP” or “Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and

WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and

WHEREAS, the D epartment of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted emergency regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas (“Applicant”) desires to submit an application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

3. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and to refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constrain housing production.

Examples of such local laws, policies, and action include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, orpermit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that it commits itself to affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50.

4. If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents”).

5. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application; the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents; the Program Regulations; and any and all other applicable law.

6. The Mayor or designee is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN:

The undersigned, Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk of Applicant, does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing is a true and full copy of a resolution of the Applicant’s governing body adopted at a duly convened meeting on the date above -mentioned, and that the resolution has not been altered, amended, or repealed.

SIGNATURE: _____________________ DATE: _____________________

NAME: __________________________ TITLE: _____________________

Prohousing Designation Program Application

State of California
Governor Gavin Newsom

Lourdes Castro Ramírez, Secretary
Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency

Gustavo Velasquez, Director
Department of Housing and Community Development

Megan Kirkeby, Deputy Director
Division of Housing Policy Development

2020 West El Camino, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833

Website: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/prohousing Email: [email protected]

July 2021

Prohousing Designation Program Application Package
Instructions

The applicant is applying for a Prohousing D esignation under the Prohousing Designation Program (“Prohousing” or “Program”), which is administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) pursuant to Government Code section 65589.9.

The Pro gram creates incentives for Jurisdictions that are compliant with Housing Element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing Policies. These incentives will take the form of additional points or other preference in the scoring of applications for competitive housing and infrastructure programs. The administrators of each such program will determine the value and form of the preference.

In order to be considered for a Prohousing Designation, the applicant must accurately complete all sections of this application, including any relevant appendices. The Department reserves the right to request additional clarifying information from the applicant.

This application is subject to Government Code section 65589.9, and to the regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) adopted by the Department in promulgation thereof (“Regulations”).

All capitalized terms in this application shall have the meanings set forth in Section 6601 of the Regulations.

All applicants must submit a complete, signed application package to the Department , in electronic format, in order to be considered for a Prohousing Designation. Please direct electronic copies of the completed application package to the following email address:

[email protected].

A complete application will include all items identified in the Application Checklist.

In relation to Appendix 1, the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program, please use strikethrough and underline if proposing any modifications to the text of the Resolution.

Appendix 2, the Proposed Policy Completion Schedule, applies only if an application includes proposed policies.

Appendix 3, Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet, includes a blank template to be completed by the applicant as part of the application, as well as a Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet with an example of how this template may be completed.

Appendix 4 lists examples of Prohousing Policies with enhancement factors to aid applicants in understanding how enhancement factors may be applied.

Appendix 5 is where the applicant will include any additional information and supporting documentation for the application.

If you have questions regarding this application or the Program, or if you require technical assistance in preparing this application, please email [email protected].

Application Checklist

Yes No
Application Information ☒ ☐
Certification and Acknowledgement ☒ ☐
The Legislative Information form is completed. ☒ ☐
The Threshold Requirements Checklist is completed. ☒ ☐ A duly adopted and certified Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program is included in the application package. (See Appendix 1 for the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (New 04/21) form.)
☒ ☐
If applicable, the Proposed Policy Completion Schedule is completed. (See Appendix 2.)
☒ ☐
The Project Proposal Scoring Sheet is completed. (See Appendix 3 for the Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and the Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet)
☒ ☐
Additional information and supporting documentation (Applicant to provide as Appendix 5)
☒ ☐

Application Information

Applicant (Jurisdiction): City of Salinas
Applicant Mailing Address: 65 West Alisal St, 2nd Floor City: Salinas
ZIP Code: 93901
Website: www.cityofsalinas.org
Authorized Representative Name Megan Hunter
Authorized Representative Title: Community Development Director Phone: 8317587334
Email: [email protected]
Contact Person Name: Rod Powell
Contact Person Title: Planning Manager
Phone: 831-758-7334 Ext x7487
Email: [email protected]
Proposed Total Score (Based on
Appendix 3):
53 CERTIFICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT

As authorized by the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (Resolution No. ), which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full, I hereby submit this full and complete application on behalf of the applicant.

I certify that all information and representations set forth in this application are true and correct.

I further certify that any proposed Prohousing Policy identified herein will be enacted within two (2) years of the date of this application submittal.

I acknowledge that this application constitutes a public record under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.) and is therefore subject to public disclosure by the Department.

Signature: __________________________________________

Name and Title: ______________________________________

Date: _______________________________________________

Legislative Information

District Number Legislator’s Name

Federal
Congressional
District

20 Congressman Jimmy Panetta

State
Assembly
District

30 Assembly Member Robert Rivas

State
Senate
District

12 State Senator Anna M. Caballero

Applicants can find their respective State Senate representatives at https://www.senate.ca.gov/, and their respective State Assembly representatives at https://www.assembly.ca.gov/

Threshold Requirements Checklist

The applicant meets the following threshold requirements in accordance with Section 6604 of the Regulations:

Yes No
The applicant is a Jurisdiction. ☒ ☐
The applicant has adopted a Compliant Housing Element. ☒ ☐ The applicant has submitted or will submit a legally sufficient Annual Progress Report prior to designation.
☒ ☐
The applicant has completed, on or before the relevant statutory deadlines, any rezone program or zoning that is necessary to remain in compliance with Government Code section 65583, subdivision (c)(1). ☐ ☐
The applicant is in compliance, at the time of the application, with applicable state housing law, including, but not limited to, Housing Element Law; “No Net Loss” Law (Gov. Code, § 65863); the Housing Accountability Act (Gov. Code, § 65589.5); State Density Bonus Law (Gov. Code, § 65915 et seq.); laws relating to the imposition of school facilities fees or other requirements (Gov. Code, § 65995 et seq.); Least Cost Zoning Law (Gov. Code, § 65913.1); the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (Stats. 2019, ch. 654); and antidiscrimination law (Gov. Code, § 65008).
☒ ☐
The applicant has duly adopted and certified a Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program, which is hereby incorporated by reference. (A true and correct copy of the resolution is included in this application package.)
☒ ☐

Project Proposal
Category 1: Favorable Zoning and Land Use

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
1A Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total or income category.
3 1B Permitting missing middle housing uses (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) by right in existing low-density, single-family residential zones.
3 1C Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 125 to 149 percent of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total or income category. These points shall not be awarded if the applicant earns three points pursuant to Category (1)(A) above.
2 1D Density bonus programs which exceed statutory requirements by 10 percent or more.
2 1E Increasing allowable density in low-density, single-family residential areas beyond the requirements of state Accessory Dwelling Unit law (e.g., permitting more than one ADU or JADU per single-family lot).

These policies shall be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above.
2 1F Reducing or eliminating parking requirements for residential development as authorized by Government Code sections 65852.2; adopting vehicular parking ratios that are less than the relevant ratio thresholds at subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of Government Code section 65915, subdivision (p)(1); or adopting maximum parking requirements at or less than ratios pursuant to Government Code section 65915, subdivision (p).
2 1G Zoning to allow for residential or mixed uses in one or more non- residential zones (e.g., commercial, light industrial). Qualifying non- residential zones do not include open space or substantially similar zones.
1 1H Modification of development standards and other applicable zoning provisions to promote greater development intensity. Potential areas of focus include floor area ratio; height limits; minimum lot or unit sizes; setbacks; and allowable dwelling units per acre. These policies must be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above. 1 1I Establishment of a Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone, as defined in Government Code section 65620, or a housing sustainability district, as defined in Government Code section 66200.
1 1J Demonstrating other zoning and land use actions that measurably support the Acceleration of Housing Production.
1 Project Proposal
Category 2: Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
2A Establishment of ministerial approval processes for a variety of housing types, including single-family and multifamily housing. 3 2B Establishment of streamlined, program-level CEQA analysis and certification of general plans, community plans, specific plans with accompanying Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), and related documents.
2 2C Documented practice of streamlining housing development at the project level, such as by enabling a by-right approval process or by utilizing statutory and categorical exemptions as authorized by applicable law (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21155.1, 21155.4, 21159.24, 21159.25; Gov. Code, § 65457; Cal Code Regs., tit. 14, §§ 15303, 15332; Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21094.5, 21099, 21155.2, 21159.28).
2 2D Establishment of permit processes that take less than four months.

Policies under this Category (2)(D) must address all approvals necessary to issue building permits.
2 2E Absence or elimination of public hearings for projects consistent with zoning and the general plan.
2 2F Establishment of consolidated or streamlined permit processes that minimize the levels of review and approval required for projects, and that are consistent with zoning regulations and the general plan. 1 2G Absence, elimination or replacement of subjective development and design standards with objective development and design standards that simplify zoning clearance and improve approval certainty and timing.
1 2H Establishment of one-stop-shop permitting processes or a single point of contact where entitlements are coordinated across city approval functions (e.g., planning, public works, building) from entitlement application to certificate of occupancy.
1 2I Priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for ADUs/JADUs, multifamily housing, or homes affordable to lower- or moderate-income households.
1 2J Establishment of a standardized application form for all entitlement applications.
1 2K Practice of publicly posting status updates on project permit approvals on the Internet.
1 2L Limitation on the total number of hearings for any project to three or fewer. Applicants that accrue points pursuant to Category (2)(E) are not eligible for points under this Category (2)(L).
1 2M Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably decrease production timeframes or promote the streamlining of approval processes.
1 Project Proposal
Category 3: Reduction of Construction and Development Costs

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
3A Waiver or significant reduction of development impact fees for residential development.
3 3B Adoption of ordinances or implementation of other mechanisms that result in less restrictive requirements than Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 to reduce barriers for property owners to create ADUs/JADUs. Examples of qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, development standards improvements, permit processing improvements, dedicated ADU/JADU staff, technical assistance programs, and pre-approved ADU/JADU design packages.
2 3C Adoption of other fee reduction strategies separate from Category (3)(A) above, including fee deferrals and reduced fees for housing for persons with special needs.
1 3D Promoting innovative housing types (e.g., manufactured homes, recreational vehicles, park models) that reduce development costs. 1 3E Measures that reduce costs for transportation-related infrastructure or programs that encourage active modes of transportation or other alternatives to automobiles. Qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, publicly funded programs to expand sidewalks or protect bike/micro-mobility lanes; creation of on-street parking for bikes; transit- related improvements; or establishment of carshare programs. 1 3F Adoption of universal design ordinances pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17959.
1 3G Establishment of pre-approved or prototype plans for missing middle housing types (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) in low-density, single-family residential areas.
1 3H Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably reduce construction or development costs.
1 Project Proposal
Category 4: Providing Financial Subsidies

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
4A Establishment of local housing trust funds or collaboration on a regional housing trust fund.
2 4B Provide grants or low-interest loans for ADU/JADU construction affordable to lower- and moderate-income households.
2 4C A comprehensive program that complies with the Surplus Land Act (Gov. Code, § 54220 et seq.) and that makes publicly owned land available for affordable housing, or for multifamily housing projects with the highest feasible percentage of units affordable to lower income households. A qualifying program may utilize mechanisms such as land donations, land sales with significant write-downs, or below-market land leases.
2 4D Establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District or similar local financing tool that, to the extent feasible, directly supports housing developments in an area where at least 20 percent of the residences will be affordable to lower income households. 2 4E Directed residual redevelopment funds to affordable housing. 1 4F Development and regular (at least biennial) use of a housing subsidy pool, local or regional trust fund, or other similar funding source. 1 4G Prioritization of local general funds for affordable housing. 1 4H Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably promote, develop, or leverage financial resources for housing. 1 Project Proposal
Enhancement Factors

The Department shall utilize enhancement factors to increase the point scores of Prohousing Policies. Each Prohousing Policy will receive extra points for enhancement factors in accordance with the chart below.

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
1 Policy that represents one element of a unified, multi-faceted strategy to promote multiple planning objectives, such as efficient land use, access to public transportation, affordable housing, climate change solutions, and/or hazard mitigation.
2 2 Policies that promote development consistent with the state planning priorities pursuant to Government Code section 65041.1. 1 3 Policies that diversify planning and target community and economic development investments (housing and non-housing) to improve lower opportunity areas. Such areas include, but are not limited to, Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, and
disadvantaged communities pursuant to California Senate Bill 535 (2012).
1 4 Policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of lower income households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to lower income households. 1 5 Rezoning and other policies that support high-density development in Location Efficient Communities.
1 6 Rezoning and other policies that result in a net gain of housing capacity while concurrently mitigating development impacts on or from Environmentally Sensitive or Hazardous Areas.
1 7 Zoning policies that increase housing choices and affordability in High Resource and Highest Resource areas, as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps.
1 8 Other policies that involve meaningful actions towards affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50, including, but not limited to, outreach campaigns, updated zoning codes, and expanded access to financing support.
1 Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Instructions

The Department shall validate applicants’ scores based on the extent to which each identified Prohousing Policy contributes to the Acceleration of Housing Production. The Department shall assess applicants’ Prohousing Policies in accordance with Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (f)(2), and Sections 6605 and 6606 of the Regulations.

The Department shall further assess applicants’ Prohousing Policies using the following four scoring categories: Favorable Zoning and Land Use; Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes; Reduction of Construction and Development Costs; and Providing Financial Subsidies. Applicants shall demonstrate that they have enacted or proposed at least one policy that significantly contributes to the Acceleration of Housing Production in each of the four categories. A Prohousing Designation requires a total score of 30 points or more across all four categories.

Instructions

Please utilize one row of the Scoring Sheet for each Prohousing Policy.

 Category Number: Select the relevant category number from the relevant Project Proposal list in this application. Where appropriate, applicants may utilize a category number more than once.  Concise Written Description of Prohousing Policy: Set forth a brief description of the enacted or proposed Prohousing Policy.
 Enacted or Proposed: Identify the Prohousing Policy as enacted or proposed. For proposed Prohousing Policies, please complete Appendix 2: Proposed Policy Completion Schedule.  Documentation Type: For enacted Prohousing Policies, identify the relevant documentary evidence (e.g., resolution, zoning code provisions). For proposed Prohousing Policies, identify the documentation which shows that implementation of the policy is pending.
 Web Links/Electronic Copies: Insert the Web link(s) to the relevant documentation or indicate that electronic copies of the documentation have been attached to this application as Appendix 5.  Points: Enter the appropriate number of points using the relevant Project Proposal list in this application.  Enhancement Category Number (optional): If utilizing an enhancement factor for a particular Prohousing Policy, enter the appropriate category number using the relevant Project Proposal list in this application.  Enhancement Points (optional): If utilizing an enhancement factor for a particular Prohousing Policy, enter the point(s) for that Prohousing Policy.
 Total Points: Add the enhancement point(s) to the Prohousing Policy’s general point score.

Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (New 04/21)
Appendix 1: Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALINAS

AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE PROHOUSING

DESIGNATION PROGRAM

WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted emergency regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas (“Applicant”) desires to submit an application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

Examples of such local laws, policies, and action include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, or
Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (New 04/21)

4. permit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that it commits itself to affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50.

5. If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents”).

6. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application; the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents; the Program Regulations; and any and all other applicable law.

7. The Community Development Director is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ________, 20__, by the following vote:

AYES: [Insert #] NOES: [Insert #] ABSENT: [Insert #] ABSTAIN: [Insert #]

The undersigned, , does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing is a true and full copy of a resolution of the Applicant’s governing body adopted at a duly convened meeting on the date above-mentioned, and that the resolution has not been altered, amended, or repealed.

SIGNATURE: _____________________ DATE: _____________________

NAME: __________________________ TITLE: _____________________

Appendix 2: Proposed Policy Completion Schedule

Category
Number
Concise Written Description of
Proposed Policy
Key Milestones and
Milestone Dates
Anticipated
Completion
Date
Notes
2A The East Area Specific Plan, a specific plan pertaining to the Salinas future Growth Area will implement a
streamlined entitlement process enabling future
development applications to be ministerially processed
and tier off of Specific Plan Environmental Impact
Report (EIR)/environmental documents provided the
proposed development is consistent with the Specific
Plan and EIR.

On January 18, 2022, The Salinas
City Council received and accepted
an administrative report on the
preparation of a specific plan for
the east area of the North of
Boronda Future Growth Area (East
FGA). This administrative report
presented the opportunity for City
Council to leverage current
advanced planning activities
occurring under the General Plan
Update
(Vision Salinas 2040) and the
estimated costs to prepare a City-
Driven EASP to streamline the
entitlement process for future
development in the East FGA.

An
Implementation
plan and phasing
is a component
and requirement
that will be
addressed in the
specific plan.

Construction of the land uses proposed under the
Specific Plan would occur over an approximately 20-
year period, with buildout occurring by
approximately 2040. The City of Salinas will pool
resources to complete the East Area Specific Plan
through the General Plan Update (GPU). leveraging
current advanced planning activities occurring under
the General Plan Update (Visión Salinas 2040) will
allow the EASP to be completed by Dec 31, 2023.
1G The Salinas Downtown Vibrancy Plan envisions a
dynamic transformation of the Downtown Core and the
Downtown Neighborhood areas. To transform these
existing urbanized areas and allow for an integrated and innovative urban growth the city created the Central City Overlay District (CC) which combines the downtown
core and downtown neighborhood areas. The CC overlay
district provides development regulations and design
standards to encourage and accommodate development of
mixed use, commercial, retail, and office uses within the Central City, increase opportunities for infill housing and innovative retail, and improve transportation corridors into pedestrian-oriented civic boulevards with mixed-use projects.

Two elements of the Downtown
Vibrancy Plan, the Main Street
Streetscape Project and the
Downtown Complete Streets
Project began construction in April
2020. both projects are projected
were completed in Spring, 2021.

The Downtown Vibrancy project
life cycle is divided in phases the
very last phase has a projected end
date of 2025.

The Downtown
Vibrancy project
life cycle is
divided in phases
the very last
phase has a
projected end
date of 2025.

1J The West Area Specific Plan area is part Salinas Future Growth Area (FGA). In 2002 the Salinas General Plan
Divided the City’s Future Growth Area into three
proposed specific plan areas: The West Area, The Central Area and the East Area. The West Area is approximately
797- acre site and currently utilized primarily for row- crop farming and other agricultural- related activities.

In December 2019 the City
Council:

1. Approved a resolution certifying
the West Area Specific Plan Final
Program Environmental Impact
Report
Buildout of the
Specific Plan is
conservatively
anticipated to
occur by 2040.

The West Area Specific Plan is currently complete
and approved. The City Council approved the West
Area Plan on Dec 17, 2019. However, lawsuits were
filed on the environmental impact report. The City is
underway with the additional CEQA analysis
required under the court order.

The West Area Specific Plan will serve as the
implementation tool to realize the Salinas General Plan vision which requires the FGA development to be based
on the Principles of New Urbanism (ultimate distribution, location, and intensity of land uses) as well of other
design principles such as Crime Prevention through
Environmental Design (CPTED), Health in All Polices,
Green Streets and Smart Growth.

2. Approved a resolution adopting
both the CEQA Findings of Fact,
including the Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and the
Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program for the Specific

3. Approved a resolution for the
West Area Specific Plan

4. Adopted an Ordinance
approving Rezone (RZ 2019-001)
and amending the City of Salinas
Zoning Map accordingly for
approximately 797 acres of land
located within the West Area
Specific Plan Project area.

5.Adopted an Ordinance approving
Development Agreement

Construction of the land uses proposed under the
Specific Plan would occur over an approximately 20-
year period, with buildout occurring by
approximately 2040.
1J East Area Specific Plan area is part of the City of Salinas Future Growth Area (FGA). The General Plan requires
that new development in the FGA be based on New
Urbanism as well as other design principles to promote
walkability and the use of alternative modes of
transportation, provide a variety of housing choices,
ensure access to parks and open space, and promote
sustainability. The East Area is about a 922 Acre carve out of the Salinas Future Growth Area. The East Area
Specific Plan will be City driven and it will allow, or the city’s vision goals and objectives for development to
guide implementation. This will be an opportunity to
produce housing at higher density and offer a variety of housing types at a variety of affordability levels.

On January,2022
The Salinas City Council received
and accepted an administrative
report on the preparation of a
specific plan for the east area of the
North of Boronda Future Growth
Area (East FGA). This
administrative report presented the
opportunity for city council to
leverage current advanced planning
activities occurring under the
General Plan Update
(Vision Salinas 2040) and the
estimated costs to prepare a City-
Driven EASP.

An
Implementation
plan and phasing
is a component
and requirement
that will be
addressed in the
specific plan.

Construction of
the land uses
proposed under a
specific plan
would occur
approximately 20
years. Buildout
would occur as
an estimate by
2040.

Construction of the land uses proposed under the
Specific Plan would occur over an approximately 20-
year period, with buildout occurring by
approximately 2040.
1J The Central Area Specific Plan encompasses
approximately 760 Acres of land located in the Salinas
Future Growth Area (FGA). The approximately 760-acre
project site is currently utilized primarily for row-crop farming and contains limited existing development. The
General Plan requires that new development in the FGA

1.September 8, 2017- Notice of
preparation (NOP) formal launch
of the CEQA process

2. June 27, 2020- Draft of
Environmental Impact Report
The Plan Area is
currently under
multiple
ownerships and
development will
The Central Area Specific Plan is complete and
approved. The City Council approved the Central
Area Specific Plan on November, 17, 2020.

However, a lawsuit was filed on the environmental
impact report. The central area hasn’t gotten to the
point to proceed with the additional CEQA yet
be based on New Urbanism as well as other design
principles such as Crime Prevention through
Environmental Design (CPTED), Health in All Polices,
Green Streets and Smart Growth. At build-out (estimated to occur over 20 to 30 years), the project will include approximately 3,911 dwelling units (provided as a mix of low, medium and high densities in conformance with the
General Plan).

(DEIR) and specific Plan 45- day
public comment period.

3. July 9, 2020- Traffic and
Transportation Commission
recommended approval (6-0, 1
absent)

4. August 11, 2020- DEIR 45-day
public comment period closed; 13
letters received

5. September 9, 2020- Library and
Community Services Commission
(5-0, 1 absent)

6. October 14, 2020- Virtual
Community Meeting

7. October 21, 2020- Planning
Commission (5-1 with 1abstention)
recommending the City Council
approve the project

8. November17, 2020:

City Council approved resolution
certifying the Central Area Specific
Plan Final Program Environmental
Impact Report

9. November 17, 2020, City
Council adopted an Ordinance
approving Rezone and amending
the City of Salinas Zoning Map
accordingly for approximately 760
acres of land located within the
Central Area Specific Plan Project
area.

10. November 17, 2020, City
Council adopted an Ordinance
approving Development
agreement.

likely be phased
over 20-30 years.

It is anticipated that buildout of the Plan Area, along with the development of other areas of the City, will
occur over an approximately 20 to 30 year time
period.
1J The Downtown Vibrancy Plan is a strategic document
that guides the revitalization of downtown Salinas. The Salinas City Council adopted the Downtown Vibrancy
In October 2021 City Council
approved a resolution to amend the
General Plan Land Use
The Downtown
Vibrancy project
life cycle is

Plan in 2015. At its inception two major outcomes were
sought by stakeholders that was improving mobility and
effectively managing parking. Through the Plans
outreach and engagement process the plan evolved to
include four major themes: Destination Downtown
(which focuses on improving mobility for pedestrian’s
bicyclist, transit riders and vehicles) Managing parking resources ( which focuses on exploring where parking
should be provided to serve anticipated demands and
establishing a game plan for building structure parking and repurposing surface parking lots for development
activities) , building the heart of Salinas ( which focuses on City branding and Identity shaping) and stimulating
development activity ( which focuses on the creating of catalyst sites from former surface parking lots as well as aligning the land use approval process to facilitate private investments in down town development).

Designations of six sites (zoned
Public/Semipublic
(PS)/Commercial Retail (CR)) to
Mixed Use; and adopt an
Ordinance to rezone the same six
sites to Mixed Use (MX) and
expand the Downtown Core Area
(DC) Overlay to include the
Intermodal Transportation Center
(ITC) site. The purpose of the
proposed rezone and General Plan
Amendment is to facilitate the
production of high-density
housing, consistent with the City’s
2015 Downtown Vibrancy Plan
(DVP).
divided in phases
the very last
phase has a
projected end
date of 2025.

3D Scattered site approach to family housing-
The California Interagency Council on Homelessness
(Cal ICH) awarded $2.6 million dollar grant to the City of Salinas which will be used to purchase single-family homes and add accessory dwelling units (ADUs) to serve
families with dependent minors that are experiencing
homelessness. The properties to be purchase with this
grant will be consistent with the Fair Housing
Regulations and will be located within areas of
opportunity. Properties will not concentrate within a
single neighborhood and property selection will be
determined based on market availability, location, size, and site constraints.

The deadline to spend 50% of the
Cal ICH award 6/30/24.

Allocated funds
will be expended
by June 30,
2026.

3D Home Key Round 2- Scattered Site Family Housing-

The City of Salinas Homekey Program Round 2
application with Bay Area Community Services Housing
Corporation (BACS) sought to acquire ten (10)
residential properties within the City’s jurisdiction to provide 10-15 new affordable housing units for families experiencing chronic homelessness. Also, the City
considering adding ADU’s to those residential properties.

Due to not meeting the Homekey NOFA threshold
requirement regarding “site control of the property at the time of application” the City was unable to move the
application forward in the last round. When the Homekey When the third round of the
Homekey Program's Notice of
Funding Availability (NOFA) is
released in October 2022, the City
of Salinas will likely consider
applying.
2023.

NOFA is announced in October 2022, the City will
consider applying if HCD adjusts the rules for Homekey
Round 3.

3E The East Alisal Corridor Plan -
In 2016 The City of Salinas in partnership with the Local Government Commission, Building Healthy
Communities, the City of Salinas Community
Development Dept and Public Works Department
received a Sustainable Cities Transportation Planning
Grant from Caltrans for a complete street plan along East Alisal Street between Front Street and Bardin Road. The grant also funded a robust outreach process for this
significant transportation route that runs through the
commercial heart of East Salinas. The resulting East
Alisal Street Corridor Plan combines community
recommendations and priorities with best practices to
create a vision for a safer corridor for users of all modes of transportation. Additionally, the plan would allow the city to be well poised to apply for implementation
funding. City Council accepted the complete street
corridor plan in January 2019.

On October, 2020 City Council
approved a motion to remove
uncontrolled marked crosswalks at
the intersections of West Alisal
Street and Capitol Street and East
Alisal Street at California Street.

As it relates to
the
implementation
timeline
The East Alisal
Corridor Plan Is
a component of
Alisal Vibrancy
Plan. The East
Alisal Vibrancy
Plan (which
encompasses a
broader
parameter that
includes the East
Alisal Corridor
region) outlines
that some
transportation
and
Infrastructure
efforts could
span 10-15 years.

3E The Downtown Vibrancy Plan is a strategic document
that guides the revitalization of downtown Salinas. The Salinas City Council adopted the Downtown Vibrancy
Plan in 2015. At its inception two major outcomes were
sought by stakeholders that was improving mobility and
effectively managing parking. Through the Plans
outreach and engagement process the plan evolved to
include four major themes: Destination Downtown
(which focuses on improving mobility for pedestrian’s
bicyclist, transit riders and vehicles) managing parking resources ( which focuses on exploring where parking
should be provided to serve anticipated demands and
establishing a game plan for building structure parking and repurposing surface parking lots for development
activities) , building the heart of Salinas ( which focuses on City branding and Identity shaping) and stimulating
Two elements of the Downtown
Vibrancy Plan, the Main Street
Streetscape Project and the
Downtown Complete Streets
Project began construction in April
2020. both projects are projected
were completed in Spring, 2021.

The Downtown Vibrancy project
life cycle is divided in phases the
very last phase has a projected end
date of 2025.

The Downtown
Vibrancy project
life cycle is
divided in phases
the very last
phase has a
projected end
date of 2025.

development activity ( which focuses on the creating of catalyst sites from former surface parking lots as well as aligning the land use approval process to facilitate private investments in down town development).

3E The Ailsal Vibrancy Plan is an action-oriented
comprehensive strategy that focuses on East Salinas with the intent of alleviating and reversing the neglect and underinvestment that the community has faced for
decades. Within the vibrancy plan there is a
Transportation and Infrastructure Component, and it
outlines goals and policies related to Establishing a
connected and equitable multimodal transportation
network and designing and maintaining safe streets.

1. E. Laurel Drive Pedestrian
Improvements Project – Completed
in Fall 2021.

2. Safe Routes to School
improvement project on Bardin
Road anticipated construction
completion: September/ October
2022.

The Alisal
Vibrancy Plan is
Ongoing Since
1993, HUD has
recognized the
Alisal as a
Neighborhood
Revitalization
Strategy Area
(NRSA).

An estimated timeframe ( for implementing actions
pertaining to the East Alisal Vibrancy Plan) is
organized into the following categories:

o Ongoing – already started and continuing into the
future
o Immediate – within a year
o Short – 1-3 years
o Medium – 4-6 years
o Long – 6-10 years

4A Regional Housing Trust Fund-
The City of Salinas approved a resolution in 2019
enabling the City to participate in a local Housing Trust Fund Program (LHTF) application to HCD submitted by
the County of Monterey to establish a Regional Housing
Trust Fund. The applications outlined conditions needed to be met by each participant. Admittedly some
participating jurisdictions fell short of the program
requirements and the application was not perused for that application period. Going forward, the City of Salinas
plans to reconvene and reapply at a more fitting time.

When the Local Housing Trust
Fund (LHTF) Program application
becomes available in 2023 the City
of Salinas will consider applying.
2023
4B Permanent Local Housing Allocation Funds (PLHA) for a revolving ADU loan program-
The City of Salinas will allocate HCD Permanent Local
Housing Allocation funds (PLHA)
to create an ADU Program which provides revolving
loans to moderate or low-income households to
accelerate ADU production.

$200,000 PLHA Funds
(2021) allocated to establish a
revolving loan fund for ADU
development.
2030
4G Community Development Analyst Position within the
Rental Registry Program will be the person operating the program and will be liaison between landlords and
property management personnel and tenants. A
Community Development Analyst will also allow the
City to have a go to person when it comes to
understanding the City’s housing stock and scaling or
modifying relevant services like tenant landlord
mediation and assistance programs.

On January 8, 2019, the City
Council approved a resolution
authorizing an understanding with
The National Resource Network
(NRN) to assist in the development
and implementation of a rental
registry.
2023

Appendix 3: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet

Project Proposal Scoring Sheet
Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted
or
Proposed
Documentation Type
(e.g., resolution,
zoning code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
1B 1. In October 2021 the City
of Salinas amended chapter
37 of the Salinas Municipal
Code to permit certain
residential uses in the
commercial thoroughfare
(CT) Zoning District with a
Conditional Use Permit
(CUP). The residential uses
allowed with this
amendment and through a
conditional use permit
include Multi family
dwelling, multiple detached
dwellings, mixed uses, and
interim housing.

E Zoning Code 1. Council Staff
Report ZCA
Allowing
Residential in
the CT Zone
3 5 1 4
1G 1. Downtown Vibrancy Plan
recommends expanding the
area of the Central City
Overlay District and
rezoning key catalyst sites
such as surface parking lots
from the Public/Semipublic
zoning district to Mixed Use
zoning district or Mixed
Arterial Frontage zoning
district to improve infill
housing near existing office,
commercial, and recreational
uses, which would also
facilitate the use of transit
and alternative
transportation.

2. Lead by an SB2 funded
planning project in October
2021 the City of Salinas
amended the General Plan to
change the General Plan
designations of six sites and
rezoned those same six sites
from Public/Semipublic or
commercial retail to mixed
use and expanded the
Downtown Core Area
Overlay District to Include
the Intermodal
Transportation Center. The
purpose of the General Plan
amendment and rezone is to
facilitate the production of
high-density infill housing in
City owned lots, an effort
consistent with The City’s
2015 Downtown Vibrancy
Plan.

P/E Plan/Zoning Code 1.Chapter 5 of
the Salinas
Downtown
Vibrancy Plan

1a. Draft
Downtown CC
Reso MND
GPA,

1b. Planning
Commission
Resolution,

2. General Plan
Amendment,
Rezone, and
Expansion of
the Downtown
Core Overlay
District

2a. Downtown
Rezone Exhibits

2b. Downtown
Parking Lot and
Intermodal
Transportation
Center Rezone
Project Initial
Study
1 1 2 3
1H The Salinas General Plan
(within its Land Use And
Housing Elements)
integrated principles of
New Urbanism into the
development goals and
policies for the City Future
Growth Areas (FGA). Two
base districts and two
overlay districts were
established to allow a
mixture of land uses and a
higher density and
intensity of development
standards than typically
described for the other
zoning districts in the city.

The two base zoning
districts are: (1) New
urbanism (NU) zoning
districts and (2) Mixed
Use Districts. The two
overlay districts are: (1)
Focused Growth (FG)
Overlay District and (2)
Central City (CC) Overlay
District. However, the
FGA is also subject to a
Specific Plan Overlay
District. The Overlay
requires that a Specific
Plan be approved by the
City prior to the
development of any land
located in the FGA.

The New Urbanism
districts are as follow:

(1) Neighborhood
Edge/Low Density
Residential (NE). To
provide areas for
predominately detached
single-family dwellings,
together with other
dwelling types so that the
E Zoning Code 1. New
Urbanism
(NU) District
Regulations

1b. City of
Salinas
Municipal Code
Focoused
Growth Overlay
District

1c. WASP City
Council Report

1d. WASP
Resolution

1c. CASP City
Council Report

1d. CASP
Resolution

1e. City of
Salinas 2015-
2023 Housing
Element

1f. City of
Salinas Future
Growth Area
Map

1 7 1 2
minimum average density
per net residential acre
within this district is not
less than six dwelling units
per net residential acre
and the maximum
average density is not
more than eight dwelling
units per net residential
acre without density
bonus

(2) Neighborhood
General 1/Medium
Density Residential (NG-
1 To provide areas for a
diverse range of low,
medium, and some high
density dwellings such as
detached single-family
dwelling units on large
and small lots, rowhouses,
green courts, duplexes,
cottages, and attached
multifamily dwelling units
where the minimum
average density within this
district is not less than
nine dwelling units per net
residential acre and the
maximum average density
is not more than fifteen
dwelling units per net
residential acre without
density bonus.

(3) Neighborhood
General 2/High Density
Residential (NG-2)

To provide areas for
medium and high density
dwellings such as lane
homes, green courts,
cottages, rowhouses, and
multifamily dwelling units
where the minimum
average density is not less
than sixteen dwelling units
per net residential acre
and the maximum
average density is not
more than twenty-four
dwelling units per net
residential acre without
density bonus.

(4) Village Center (VC),

To provide areas for
mixed use, stand-alone
retail and office uses, flex
use, high density
residential, and public and
semipublic facilities
generally sited along a
“Main Street” or around a
village square where the
maximum dwelling units
per acre is ten dwelling
units per acre and the
maximum floor area (FAR)
is 1.0 or as otherwise
provided for in this
division.

The Central Area
Specific Plan (CASP)
pages 69–70 contain a
summary of the Floor
Area Ratio (FAR) and the
minimum required and
maximum permissible
densities.

West Area Specific Plan
(WASP) pages 93–101
have a summary of the
average residential
density, projected
residential units, and floor
area ratios.

The Mixed Use Districts
consist of the following:
(1) Mixed Use (MX) and
(2) Mixed Arterial
Frontage (MAF) zoning
districts.

The Focused Growth
(FG) Overlay district is
applied to existing
urbanized areas that the
Salinas General Plan has
identified for additional
growth and revitalization.

The purpose of the FG
Overlay district regulations
is to focus growth at high
potential, under-utilized
sites within the City of
Salinas. There are 5 areas
under the Focused
Growth (FG) Overlay
District:

FG 1 has the capacity for
47 units at densities of 15
to 24 units/acre and 379
units at 30 to 40 units/acre
on underutilized sites at
least one-half acre in size

FG 2 has the capacity for
72 units at densities of 15
to 24 units/acre and 296
units at 30 to 40 units/acre
on underutilized sites of at
least one-half acre in size.

FG 3 has the capacity for
48 units at densities of 15
to 24 units/acre and 463
units at 30 to 40 units/acre
on underutilized sites of at
least one-half acre in size.

FG 4 has the capacity for
100 units at densities of
15 to 24 units/acre and
379 units at 30 to 40
units/acre on underutilized
sites of at least one-half
acre in size.

FG 5 has the capacity for
45 units at densities of 15
to 24 units/acre and 71
units at 30 to 40 units/acre
on underutilized sites of at
least one-half acre in size.

See pages 74–75 of the
Salinas Housing Element
(2015–2023) for more
information on the
classifications and
development regulations
of the Focused growth
overlay district. Further
information on the focused
growth overlay district’s
purpose, applicability, use
and development
regulations can be found
on the City of Salinas
Code of Ordinances site.

The Central City (CC)
Overlay District
The CC consists of two
areas: (1) Downtown Core
(DC) Area and the
Downtown Neighborhood
(DN) Area. The purpose of
the CC is to provide
development regulations
and design standards to
encourage mixed use
development. Under the
DC area residential uses
on the ground floor
fronting the Main Street is
restricted. Under the DN
area

1I 1. Proposed adopting an
Ordinance amending
Chapter 37 of the Salinas
Municipal Code (Zoning
Code amendment ZCA
2022-002) to allow a
school district or
community college district
to acquire, construct,
rehabilitate, or preserve
affordable rental housing
for its staff or public
consistent with the
Teacher Housing Act of
2016.

2. In August 2021 the City
of Salinas Introduced an
Amendment to chapter 37
of the City’s Municipal
Code Modifying Extended
Stay Regulations for
hotels and motels. Over
many years, Salinas has
depended on hotel/motels
that are no longer used by
visitors to provide critical
short-term housing for
agricultural workers and
emergency shelter for
homeless residents. The
Zoning code Amendment
allows hotels motels in
certain zoning districts to
obtain a Conditional Use
Permit to fully operate as
Extended Stay with
occupancy up to 10
months in a year. These
changes to Extended Stay
regulations will further
multiple goals in the
General Plan and will
minimize potential
displacement created by
employers purchasing
scarce residential
E Zoning 1. City Council
Staff Report
School District
Housing

1a. School and
Community
College District
Housing
Ordinance

1b. School and
Community
College District
Housing
Resolution

2. City Council
Staff Report on
Hotel-Motel
Extended Stay

2a. City Council
Ordinance Hotel
Motel Extended
Stay Use

2b. Salinas
Planning
Commission
Resolution to
Amend Chapter
37 of the
Salinas
Municipal Code
Modifying
Extended Stay
Regulations for
Hotel/ Motels
1 1 2 3
properties to house their
workers.
1J 1.The West Area Specific
Plan, which the City Council
authorized on December 17,
2019, is a specific plan for
the Salinas Future Growth
Area and will supply 4,340
units on 797 acres with a mix
of densities (on average, a
maximum of 11 dwelling
units per acre under the
Environmental Impact
Report).The land will be
developed using New
Urbanism design concepts,
including mandated density,
mixed-use development, and
traffic calming that is
conducive to pedestrians and
bicyclists. For the whole
West Area, the Salinas
General Plan specifies an
average density of 9 units
per net residential acre. 15-
25 percent of the dwelling
units provided will be of
high-density residential
range which is 16 to 24
dwelling units per net
residential acre and 35-45
percent of the dwelling units
being provided in the
medium density residential
range which is 7 to 14
dwelling units per net
residential acre. There are
some mechanisms available
to further achieve additional
density in the plan area. the
Village Center and
surrounding areas can
increase density up to 30-40
dwelling units per net
residential acre through
commercial conversion this
translates to an additional
250 dwelling units. More
P Plans/ City Council
Staff Report

1. West Area
Specific Plan

1a. WASP CC
report - 12-17-
19,

1b.Attachment
1 Reso

1c. Attachment
7 Project Site
Location Map
_,

1d. Attachment
8 Property
Ownership
Existing
Conditions Map

2c. Attachment
8 Property
Ownership
Existing
Conditions
Map_,

2. Central Area
Specific Plan

3. East Area
Specific Plan

3a. Power
Point- City of
Salinas East
Area Specific
Plan
Administrative
Report City
Council Meeting

1 1 2 3
density than is already
included in the plan
Can be accomplished
through the City of Salinas
Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance and the State
Density Bonus. Depending
on the Inclusionary
ordinance option selected by
developers that could
potentially yield between
521 and 869 affordable units
at various levels.

2. The proposed Central
Area Specific Plan (CASP),
a specific plan pertaining to
the Salinas Future Growth
area encompasses
approximately 760 acres.

The CASP was approved by
City Council on Nov 17,
2020, was designed using the
principles of New Urbanism
(pedestrian and bicycle-
friendly, traffic calming,
mixed used development)
and Traditional
Neighborhood Development
(TND). TND, also known as
village-style development,
represents a comprehensive
planning system that
includes a variety of housing
types and land uses in a
defined area. The Central
Area plan will provide 3,911
units with a mix of densities.

The Area as a whole is
required to provide 9
dwelling units per net
residential acre on average.
15 to 25 percent of those
units must me on the high-
density range and 35to 40
percent must be in the

4. Downtown
Vibrancy Plan

5. RFQ For
Services For
Zoning
Amendments Of
Selected
Properties
medium density range. In
addition to the general plan
required density there will be
further mechanisms to
achieve more density like the
inclusionary housing
ordinance.

3. The East Area Specific
Plan, a specific plan
pertaining to the Salinas
Future Growth Area, will be
a City driven process. This
will streamline the
entitlement process for
future development
applications and enable an
increase in housing
opportunity sites. Through a
City driven specific plan
housing can be produced at
higher density with a range
of housing kinds at various
affordability levels. The City
of Salinas will pool
resources to complete the
East Area Specific Plan
through the General Plan
Update (GPU) leveraging
current advanced planning
activities occurring under the
General Plan Update (Visión
Salinas 2040), which will
allow the EASP to be
completed by Dec 31, 2023.

4. The Downtown Vibrancy
Plan calls for the
construction of up to 500
housing units (studios and
one- or two-bedroom
apartments) over a five-year
period, with the first floors
being used for 125,000
square feet of commercial
space. Additionally, it aims
to promote walking, biking,
and public transportation.

5. Prior to updating its
General Plan (Vision Salinas
2040) , the city sought and
was awarded an SB-2
reimbursable planning grant
to rezone important
opportunity sites from
commercial/industrial to
mixed use, hence increasing
its prospective housing
opportunities. Among the
proposed sites are the Alisal
Marketplace, which could
supply 285 housing units, the
Large Shopping Centers,
which could supply 1,288
housing units, and the
Soledad and John Street site,
which could supply 244
housing units.
2A The Salinas General Plan
requires that a specific plan
be prepared before any
development may occur in
the Future Growth Area
(FGA). The East Area
Specific Plan (EASP), which
will be city-driven, will
streamline the entitlement
process and allow for the
ministerial processing of
upcoming development
applications providing the
planned development
complies with the Specific
Plan Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) and other
environmental
documentation. Future
development in the East
FGA that would include a
variety of housing types and
commercial/retail and
public/semi-public uses. The
City of Salinas will create
the EASP and complete the
required CEQA compliance
through the General Plan
Update process which is to
be completed by December
31, 2023.

P City Council Staff
Report

1.Administrative
Report to Salinas
City Council -
East Area
Specific Plan

1a. Map of
Future Growth
Area

1b. East Area
General Plan
Land Use Map

1c. City of
Salinas East Area
Specific Plan
Power Point
Presentation to
City Council
( 1/18/2022)
3 1 2 5
2D Performance Metric #2:

Permits Approved within
40 days approved April-
2018; This metric is part of
a series of performance
metrics developed for the
Salinas Permit Center to
calculate the date of real
plan check to approval.

These Performance
Metrics are part of a larger
effort (Action Plan for
Building Plan Submittal
and Review Process,
2018) to revise the
building plan review and
submittal process to
eliminate under- and over-
processing, improve
communications, limit
hand-offs between
divisions/departments,
create new standard
operating procedures, and
shift staff from being
reactive to proactive.

E Permit Center
Administrative Report
November 2019

1. Permit
Center
Administrative
Report -
November 5,
2019 - Final,

1a. Permit
Center Action
Plan Update

1b. Dashboard

1c. Staff
Report -
Permit Center
Action Plan,

1d. Permit
Center Action
Plan - April -
Updated,

1e. Flowchart
2 2
2F 1. With guidance from
Phillips Seabrook
Associates, plan review
and building code
consultants, the Internal
review of ADU permitting
process was streamlined
to allow for a quicker
permitting timeline.

2. On June 21,2022 the
City Council approved a
resolution to enter into a
professional service
agreement with CSG
Consultants inc., Bureau
Veritas North America Inc.
and 4LEAF Inc. to provide
building official, technical
permitting and inspection
services to the City’s
Permit Center through
Fiscal Year 2022-23.

Contract services are
necessary due to
increases in workload,
staff vacancies and large-
scale development
projects. The
preprofessional services
agreement will allow the
Permit Services Division
to be efficient and provide
specific choices on which
projects are addressed
through outside services
in order to maintain
excellent customer service
while staying within
required timelines.

3. In May 2019 accessory
dwelling units were
exempt from paying
development impact fees
for five years. After
E Ordinance/
Administrative report

1. Permit Center
Progress
Update
Administrative
Report

1a. Digital Plan
Review Process
Enhanced With
Project Dox

1b. Permit
Center Progress
Report Power
Point
Presentation to
City Council.

2. Report to
Council_6.21.p
df,

2a. Reso
2022,

2b. 4LEAF
Professional
Services
Agreement_6.

21.pdf,

2c. BV
Professional
Services
Agreement_6.

21.pdf,

3. ADU
exemptions
from
development
impact fees

1 1
interviewing residents who
applied for ADUs, staff
discovered that the most
significant impediment to
production is payment of
development impact fees.

Most of the City’s
development impact fees
were charged per
dwelling unit. As a result,
a 400 square foot ADU
would pay roughly the
same amount of impact
fees as a new 3,000
square foot single-family
residence.

4.The Building Inspection
Services Division
established a Virtual
Inspection Program during
the pandemic, which will
continue as an alternative
to onsite inspections to
accommodate the public
for specific inspection
types.

3a. Accessory
dwelling unit
Finance
Committee
minute order

4. Virtual
Inspections
with The City
of Salinas
2H The Establishment of a
one-stop shop permitting
process stems from a
2013 Organizational
Assessment of the
Community and Economic
Development
Department”, prepared by
Citygate Associates
(“Citygate Report”). The
Citygate report has been
the focus for Department-
wide improvements in
customer service,
efficiency, and
accountability at the
Permit Center.

On December 12–14,
2017, the City of Salinas,
Community Development,
engaged Customer
Service Advantage, Inc.
(CSA) to lead a Kaizen-
driven Process
Improvement Event to
streamline the building
permit submission and
approval process. The
December 2017 Kaizen-
driven Process
Improvement Event
resulted in an Action Plan
with 37 implementation
tasks. At the November 5,
2019, meeting, staff
updated the City Council
on the implementation of
the Action Plan,
completing twenty-three
(23) tasks and making
substantial progress on
thirteen (13).

E Action Plan 1. Permit
Center New
Action Plan
Staff Report,

1a. Kaizen
Report,

1b. Flowchart,

1c. Draft
Action Plan

1d. City Council
Update on City
Gate Report

1e. Appendix 5:

Citygate Report

1f. Permit
center progress
report on action
plan.

1g.CitygateActi
onPlanUpdate-
May 2017,

1H. Appendix
5:

Organizational
Assessment of
the Community
and Economic
Development
Department City
of Salinas, CA
Final Report

1I. Customer
Service Action
1 1
Plan Table -
May 2017
2H Establishment of a one-
stop shop permitting
process. Customer
Service Advantage, Inc.
(CSA) was engaged by
the City of Salinas,
Community Development,
to facilitate a Kaizen-
driven Process
Improvement Event to
streamline the Building
Permit Submittal Process
on December 12 –14,
2017. The December
2017 Kaizen-driven
Process Improvement
Event resulted in an
Action Plan with 37
implementation tasks. At
the November 5, 2019,
meeting, staff updated the
City Council on the
implementation of the
Action Plan, completing
twenty-three (23) tasks
and making substantial
progress on thirteen (13).

E Action Plan 1 1
2J In June 2021 the City of
Salinas entered into a
professional service
agreement with Avolve
Software, Inc.

This cloud-based software
allows applicants to
submit a standardized
application anytime it is
convenient for them, 24
hours a day, seven days a
week. The software
performs automated tasks
and gives the applicant
immediate feedback about
missing information on
forms, address validation,
contractor license
validation, the ability to
pay fees and more. The
intelligent application
forms can be modified by
city staff at any point to
adapt to current
construction demands and
trends. The software will
also guide the applicant
through each step of their
participation in the review
process with videos, in
addition to written
instruction. The software
also allows for better
tracking across review
cycles, reviewer mark-up
tools, prioritizing task
assignments, automated
solutions for versioning
complexities and process
insight analytics.

E Staff Report/ City
Council Resolution

1. Avolve
Council
Report_6.22.pdf

2. Avolve
Reso_6.22.pdf

3. Avolve
ProjectDox
SAAS
Agreement -
City of
Salinas_6.22.20
21 4. Consultant
Quote and
Statement of
Work, 5-25-
2021
1 1
2M 1. In 2018, the City of
Salinas passed an
Adaptive Reuse
Ordinance which reduces
regulatory obstacles by
allowing the reuse of
existing non-residential
buildings for housing
without requiring strict
compliance with zoning
and building standards.

This Ordinance applies to
either 1) buildings at least
50 years old in the Central
City Overlay District or 2)
a historically significant
building anywhere in the
City.

E Administrative report 1. Adaptive
Reuse
Ordinance City
council Staff
Report

1a. Adaptive
Reuse
Ordinance

1b. Adaptive
Reuse
Resolution

2. Pre-
approved ADU
Detached Plans
1 1 2 3
3A 1. ADU Development
Impact Fee Holiday (Sec.
9-50.95.35 – Exemptions)
for 5 years (2019-2024) to
help reduce cost of
permitting an ADU.

2. In June of 2019
acknowledging that high
development impact fees
were a barrier to the
production of affordable
housing the City of
Salinas tasked Willdan
Financial Services to
support the development
of new fee scenarios and
housing categories for the
City’s impact fee program.

The outcome of the Study
was a Revised Public
Facilities Impact Fee
Schedule based on
square footage. Previous
to the Wilden Impact Fee
Study The City’s Impact
Fees for Public Facilities
were charged per unit
regardless of housing
type, bedroom size or
occupancy rate. This
meant that a 3,500 square
foot house paid the same
impact fee as a single
studio apartment.

3. Chapter 9, Article V,
Section 9-44 of the
Salinas Municipal Code
allows the City Council to
exempt low-income
housing that receives
local, state, and federal
funding from development
impact fees. In September
2020 the City Installed a
Sprung structure (has a
E Ordinance 1. City of
Salinas Staff
Report on ADU
Impact Fee
Exception

1a. ADU Impact
Fee Exception
Ordinance

1c. City of
Salinas
Municipal Code

2. Housing
Development
Impact Fee
Report to the
Finance
Committee

2a. City of
Salinas Impact
Fee Analysis.

3.Salinas
Municipal
Code

3a. Sprung
Shelter Open in
China Town

3b. Staff
Report for
Development
1 1
51 bed capacity) and
five Homeful Foundation
trailers in the parking lot at
the Chinatown Navigation
Center located at 115 E.

Lake and exempted the
project from development
impact fees.

Impact Fee
Exemption
and Val's
Plumbing
Agreement for
CNC,

3c.Developme
nt Impact Fee
Exemption
Resolution for
Chinatown
Navigation
Center,

3B 1. Plans for pre-approved
ADUs (4 types) were
approved by the City on
April 7, 2022. Pre-
approved plans will
expedite the approval
process of ADU's and will
reduced the review time
for City staff. This initiative
will help homeowners
reduce the cost for the
development of an ADU.

These sets of pre-
approved plans will be
available to residents
throughout the City and it
is the City’s goal to make
these pre-approved plans
available to the general
public in June of 2022.

2. Building code expert
Phillip Seabrook and the
Blue Zones Project of
Monterey collaborated
with the City of Salinas to
develop a procedure
(Legalizing unpermitted
work) that would direct
applicants toward
legalizing unpermitted
ADUs and, if deemed
appropriate by a building
official, delay enforcement
against a qualifying
substandard ADU for five
(5) years to give the
owner of that ADU time to
correct the violation.

E Resolution 1. Pre-approved
Detached ADU
Plans

2. Appendix 5:

Blue Zones
Sponsorship-
City of Salinas
ADU Program
Contract
2 1 2 4
3C 1. Park Facilities
Development Impact Fee
was rightsized (Feb 16,
2021). Impact for public
parks were charged based
on cost per capita for infill
and subdivision
developments (Mitigation
Fee Act and Quimby Act).

The update to citywide
park development impact
fees differentiated public
park fees by housing type
and size. It accomplishes
this by estimating the
average residents per
square foot of a dwelling
unit. Smaller units pay
proportionally lower fees
based on fewer assumed
occupants compared to
larger units.

For example, if you have a
500 s.f. studio apartment
that is multifamily the
newly adopted fee
scheme would reduce the
park fee by $1,845.

2. The City of Salinas
passed an ordinance
amending the Salinas
Municipal Code to modify
the timing of payment of
development impact fees
from building permit
issuance to Certificate of
Occupancy. In the City of
Salinas 2015-2023
Housing Element, it was
recommended that staff
monitor existing
development impact fees,
including in-lieu fees,
development impact fees
and processing fees to
E Staff Report/Resolution/
Ordinance

1. City Council
Report to
Update Citywide
Park Impact Fee
Schedule

1a. Resolution
for Citywide
Parks
Development
Impact Fee
Schedule for
Residential
Units

1b. Citywide
Parks
Development
Impact Fee
Schedule

1c. Salinas -
Residential
Development
Impact Fee
Structure
Analysis Report
- 11-20-20,

2. City Council
Staff Report
Timing of
Development
Impact Fees

2a. Ordinance
Change to
Timing of
Development
Impact Fee
1 1
ensure they are not a
constraint to the feasibility
of affordable housing
development. The City
Staff reviewed
development impact fees
related to housing and
found that timing of
payment of building permit
issuance does constrain
housing development by
requiring upfront payment
of fees before permanent
financing is in place.
3D 1.The City of Salinas
Haciendas Phase III
Modular construction is an
affordable housing
development comprised of
fifty residential units for
rent to low-income
households. The modular
units were constructed
and assembled by
Guerdon Modular
Buildings in their factory
located in Boise, Idaho
and transported to the City
of Salinas. The Project the
First affordable housing
development on the
Central Coast that was
developed using modular
construction was finalized
in September 2018.

2. The City of Salinas was
awarded $2.6 million
dollar grant by the
California Interagency
Council on Homelessness
(Cal ICH) to purchase
single-family homes and
add accessory dwelling
units (ADUs) to serve
families with dependent
minors that are
experiencing
homelessness. This grant
proposal was developed
in partnership with Bay
Area Community Services
(BACS) who will purchase
the single-family homes
and add the ADUs to the
purchased properties.

This scattered site
housing approach will not
only expeditiously
increase available
E/P Staff report/
Resolution

1. 49 Affordable
Rental Units
Hikari Opening

1a. Haciendas
Phase III
Modular Unit
Instillation

2. Staff Report
Cal ICH FHC
Grant

2a. Resolution -
Cal ICH FHC
Grant

3. Home Key
Round 2
Scattered Site
City Council
Report

3a. City
Resolution for
Home Key
Round 2
Scattered Site

3b. HCD
Resolution for
Homekey 2.0
for BACS
Scattered Site
Family Housing

03.08.pdf

4. Parkside
Manor Phase
1 Senior
Housing
1 1 2 3
permanent housing units
but it will provide families
in need with
comprehensive services.

3.City of Salinas and Bay
Area Community Service
Scattered Site Model
(BACS) -
The City’s Homekey
Program Round 2
application with BACS
would seek to acquire ten
(10) residential properties
within the City’s
jurisdiction to provide 10-
15 new affordable housing
units for families
experiencing chronic
homelessness. In this
model, BACS will provide
property acquisition and
renovation on project
residences as well as
property management.

Additional services
including employment
development and
assistance, benefit access
and mental health
support, financial
assistance and money
management are also
provided.

4. May, 2021 Parkside
Manor Phase 1 – The
Monterey County Housing
Authority Development
Corporation (HDC) and
City of Salinas demolished
40 housing units and
started the setting of 80
new and affordable
modular housing units for
seniors.

3E 1.The City of Salinas
Bikeways Plan aims to
reduce the number of trips
being made by single
occupant vehicles (SOVs)
and encourage active
modes of transportation
by providing well-
designed, practical, and
secure facilities as well as
building an integrated
overall bike network. In
2016 the City of Salinas
integrated The
Transportation Agency for
Monterey County (TAMC)
regional
bicycle/pedestrian way
finding program into its
plan. TAMC’s Wayfinding
Plan not only identifies
regional connections in
the transportation
network, including
regional connections to
local networks, but also
identified the signing
strategies for the regional
routes.

2. This first iteration of the
Salinas Pedestrian Plan
sets out to determine
goals and strategies that
will increase walking in the
City by creating safe,
convenient and
pedestrian friendly
environment.

3. The Downtown
Complete Streets Project
aims to improve
pedestrian and bicycle
mobility and reduce
collisions along Lincoln
Avenue from West Alisal
P Plans 1. Bikeways
Plan (2002)

1a. T&TC RPT
0114 2015
Regional Bicycle
Wayfinding Sign
System,

1b. VM -
Wayfinding Plan
report - Salinas
TAC

1c. Regional
funding
agreement for
pedestrian and
bicycle
wayfinding
program

1d. A resolution
to approve the
regional funding
agreement for
pedestrian and
bicycle
wayfinding
program

2. Pedestrian
Plan (2004)

2a.

Transportation
grant
acceptance

2b. Resolution
ATP Plan

3a. Downtown
Complete
Streets
Brochure
1 1 2 3
Street to West Market
Street. The final plan
implements complete
streets elements on
Lincoln Avenue from West
Alisal Street to West
Market Street,
accommodates all road
users and improves
safety. Details of the
Downtown Complete
Streets project are as
follows: Roadway
restriping, Class II Bike
Lanes, Back-in Diagonal
Parking, Crosswalks,
Improved Intersection
Sight Lines, curb
extensions and Improved
Circulation.

4. The East Alisal Corridor
Plan outlines
improvements to mobility,
safety, and access for all
modes of transportation,
including walking,
bicycling, transit, and
motor vehicles, and
addresses some of the
underlying socioeconomic
challenges faced by
residents in the East Alisal
community. The Plan also
assists in aligning the
City’s transportation and
development patterns with
state and federal
transportation goals for
improving multimodal
mobility, accessibility for
all people, and fostering
livable, healthy, and
socially equitable
communities.

3b. Traffic
Study:

Downtown
Complete
Streets Project

3c. Downtown
complete
streets project
approved

3d. TTC Staff
Report,

3e. Attachment
1 Draft Plans for
the Downtown
Complete
Streets Project
– Lincoln Phase,

4. East Alisal
Street Corridor
Plan

4a. East Alisal
Street Corridor
Plan_CC Staff
Report_Final,

4b. E Alisal
Corridor Plan
CC Reso,

4c. EastAlisal
Street_Corrido
rPlan,

4d.Appendices
_A-E

5. Salinas Safe Routes to
School Plan - City staff
has been working with
The Transportation
Agency for Monterey
(TAMC) to develop a
regional program for Safe
Routes to School. The
nearly three-year planning
process described in the
Salinas SRTS Plan will
identify barriers to safe
access to all K-12 public
schools in Salinas and
recommend infrastructure
and non-infrastructure
improvements.

5. Staff
Report
5a. Resolution
_2019,

5b. 2019-09-
10 CITY
Contract.Salin
asSRTS_Partn
ers,

5c. Agreement
Attachment
Scope of Work

3H 1. The City of Salinas was
awarded $2.6 million
dollar grant by the
California Interagency
Council on Homelessness
(Cal ICH) to purchase
single-family homes and
add accessory dwelling
units (ADUs) to serve
families with dependent
minors that are
experiencing
homelessness. This grant
proposal was developed
in partnership with Bay
Area Community Services
(BACS) who will purchase
the single-family homes
and add the ADUs to the
purchased properties.

This scattered site
housing approach will not
only expeditiously
increase available
E Report 1. Staff Report
Cal ICH FHC
Grant,

2. Resolution -
Cal ICH FHC
Grant
1 1 2 3
4A 1. Provided funds for a
Regional Housing Trust
Fund (The Monterey Bay
Housing Trust fund) run
by the nonprofit Monterey
Bay Economic Partnership
(MBEP).

2. Plan to Establish a
Local Housing Trust Fund
to enable the City to
combine and leverage
resources from multiple
parties to support the
construction of new
affordable housing units in
Salinas.

E/P Staff Report/ Resolution/
Plan

1. Monterey Bay
Housing Trust
Fund Staff
Report

1a. Monterey
Bay Housing
Trust Funding
Resolution

2. PHLA
Program Staff
Report

2a. PLHA Grant
Application City
Resolution

2b. PLHA Grant
Application
State
Resolution

2c. PLHA Grant
5 Year Plan

2d. LHTF Grant
Application
State
Resolution
2 2
4B 1.There is a plan to create
a program to award
Permanent Local Housing
Allocation Funds (PLHA)
for a revolving ADU loan
program to assist low- and
moderate-income
homeowners that want to
develop an ADU in their
property. The City plans to
allocate PLHA funds from
2019 and 2023 year
towards this ADU loan
program. The program is
anticipated to begin in
2023.

E Staff Report/ Resolution/
Plans

1. Council Staff
Report PLHA/
City ADU
Program

1a. PLHA
Grant- 5 Year
Plan

2 2
4E The City of Salinas
provides loan financing to
qualified developers to
increase and preserve
affordable housing
throughout the City (on
January 10,2012, the City
Council of the City of
Salinas adopted
Resolution No. 20142
accepting for the City the
role of the successor to
the housing assets and
function of the former
redevelopment agency).

When affordable
developments repay their
loans a portion of those
funds get reinvested or
reallocated towards new
affordable housing
developments. The funds
are provided in the form of
grants and/or low interest
rates with affordable term
restrictions ranging from
20 to 55 years. Currently,
the City has several
programs where the funds
could be repaid back to
the City (once revenue is
generated through the use
of HOME funds and
received by the City of
Salinas they become
program income and
allocated toward a
revolving loan fund) and
these programs include
the HOME Investment
Partnerships (HOME),
Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG),
Permanent Local Housing
Allocation (PLHA) and the
former Redevelopment
Agency now known in the
E Annual Evaluation
Reports

1.Appendix 5:

Resolution of
the City of
Salinas to
express its
intent to serve
as the
successor
agency of the
Salinas
redevelopment
agency

2. Appendix 5:

Use of Housing
Subsidy Pool

1a.City of
Salinas Basic
Financial
Statements

1b. City of
Salinas
Consolidated
Annual
Performance
Evaluation
Report
1 1
City as the Housing
Successor Agency (HSA).

When the project funds
are repaid, they get
allocated to projects
through HUD’s Annual
Action Plans, HUD’s
substantial Amendments,
and/or City Council
approvals on specific
projects.

In 2020 The City of
Salinas used the
Redevelopment Agency
(SRA) Housing Trust
Funds in the amount of
250 to purchase and
install a spung structure at
the China Town
Navigation Center. The
Sprung Shelter space
accommodates 51 beds.

In April 2021 $357,540 of
uncommitted HOME funds
(made up of HOME
Entitlement allocation for
fiscal year (FY) 2020-2021
and uncommitted program
income (PI) from FY 2019-
2020 were allocated
toward to the Parkside
Phase-1 project. Parkside
would bring 80 senior
affordable housing units
upon completion.

In 2021-2022 CDBG
Program Income was
used for the Sun Rose
Housing Development and
the Catalyst Apartment
Rehabilitation Projects.

The Catalyst Apartments
received $550,000 in
CDBG funding to
rehabilitate 5 housing
units. The Sun Rose
Development Project is a
new 11-unit affordable
housing development. The
project involves the
demolition of dilapidated
transitional housing
consisting of 8- bedrooms
on the property with a new
8-bedroom transitional
housing units and 9
additional units of
permanent supportive
housing for persons with
psychiatric disabilities who
are homeless, chronically
homeless or at-risk of
homelessness, and 1
manager’s unit.

4F 1.Provided funds for a
Regional Housing Trust
Fund run by the nonprofit
Monterey Bay Economic
Partnership. The
Monterey Bay Housing
Trust is a revolving loan
fund that can be used to
finance acquisition,
predevelopment, or
construction of affordable
housing in the Monterey
Bay Region.

2. The Inclusionary
Housing Trust Fund is a
separate City fund
established for the specific
purpose of providing the
City with funds to assist in
the development,
rehabilitation, or
preservation of housing
that is affordable to very
low income, lower income,
median-income, moderate
income, and workforce
income households in the
City of Salinas. Monies in
the Fund may be used for
property acquisition,
development assistance,
construction, financing,
rent subsidies, and other
uses, and for other
activities required to
provide affordable
housing, such as
homebuyer education and
the costs of administering
programs to develop,
rehabilitate, or preserve
affordable housing.

E Staff Report/ Resolution 1. Monterey Bay
Housing Trust
Fund Staff
Report

1a. Monterey
Bay Housing
Trust Funding
Resolution

1b. Agreement
Between The
City of Salinas
and The
Monterey Bay
Economic
Partnership

1c. Projects
Funded by the
Monterey Bay
Housing Trust

2.City of
Salinas
Inclusionary
Housing
Guidelines

3. Appendix 5:

Housing
Production
Fund
1 1

3. Housing Production
Capital Improvement
Program Fund CIP
(9021) A Housing
Production Capital
Improvement Program
Fund was established that
combined other funds and
will be utilized in a manner
similar to a Housing Trust
Fund. Recently, an SRA
Loan was paid off in the
amount of $2.350 million,
which will be used for
future affordable housing
development and is
providing an important
source of funding. In 2020
the city constructed a
sprung structure at the
Chinatown Navigation
Center using the Housing
production fund.

4G 1. The City of Salinas in
their adopted operating
Budget FY 2021-2022
under the Community
Development Department
identifies a project titled
the Housing Production
Fund whose funding
source is the City’s
General Fund. The
Intention of the Project is
to facilitate affordable
housing production. Funds
can be used for pre-
development,
acquisition, construction,
plans, studies,
consultants, publications,
meetings, and outreach.

2. The Community
Development
Department's adopted
operating budget for fiscal
year 2023 saw an
increase of 36.4% from
fiscal year 2022. This
department includes
projects that prioritize
housing, such as the
housing production fund,
East Area Specific Plan,
Chinatown Navigation
Center Sprung Shelter,
Permanent Homeless
Shelter, and the China
Town Revitalization fund.

Local general funds were
used to generate the
operating budget.

3. Under the City of
Salinas proposed Rental
Registry program a
Housing Navigator or
community development
analyst position would be
E/P Adopted Operating
Budget Document

1. City of
Salinas Adopted
Operating
Budget FY
2021-2022

2. City of
Salinas Adopted
Operating
Budget FY 2023

3. Rental
Registration -
City Council
Staff Report -
Jan 18, 2022

3a. Rental
Registration
CityCouncil_1.1

8.pdf
1 1 2 3
created and partially
funded using local general
funds. A rental registry
program and a housing
Navigator would help
cities assess rental
housing stock, develop,
and implement housing
elements, and provide
more robust housing
services such as
mediation assistance and
locally relevant
information regarding
available resources and
legislative updates.
4H 1. The City of Salinas
Promotes and leverage
different sources of
funding to develop
affordable housing to low-
income and homeless
people. On May 19, 2022
the City of Salinas held a
Housing and Development
Forum in which housing
stakeholders and
developers convened to
review funding availability
for 100% affordable
development (855 E.

Laurel) , Surplus land act
in order to underline the
City’s current and future
development sites and
zoning updates and how
they will help
accommodate future
housing. In conjunction
with the Housing Forum
there was a site visit to
855 E. Laurel that same
week, this to showcase
where and how the future
affordable housing project
will be placed.

2. On February 2022 the
City of Salinas was given
a notice of intent for
$4,079,416 in
Encampment Resolution.

The funding will be used
for health and safety day
activities, including:
outreach and engagement
at encampment sites,
mobile health care
services , basic needs and
wrap around services,
service coordination,
referrals, transportation,
and interim and
E Staff Report/
Resolution

1. Housing and
Development
Forum

2. Staff Report
Cal ICH ERF
Acceptance

2a. Resolution
Cal ICH ERF
Acceptance

2c. Cal ICH
ERF Intent to
Award Notice

3. Project Room
Key Staff
Report

3a. Project
Room Key
Resolution
1 1
permanent housing
solutions and
encampment site
restoration

3. Funding from Project
Roomkey to convert the
Salinas Inn, Sanborn Inn,
and the Good Nite Inn into
permanent supportive
housing for people
experiencing
homelessness. During the
first round of awards the
City of Salinas Purchased
the Good Nite Inn which
provides 101 units. During
the Second round of
Homekey project funding
the City of Salinas
purchased the Sanborn
Inn which will provide 58
living units and the
Salinas Inn will provide 43
living units.

Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet

Note: This is a Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet; an actual submission may include more specificity when an applicant completes the “Concise Written Description of Prohousing Policy.”

Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted
or
Proposed
Documentation Type
(e.g., resolution,
zoning code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
1B Permitted missing
middle housing uses by
allowing duplexes, and
triplexes by right in
existing low-density,
E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
3 6 1 4
Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted
or
Proposed
Documentation Type
(e.g., resolution,
zoning code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
single-family residential
zones.
1C Sufficient sites to
accommodate 131
percent of the current
RHNA with rezoning by
total or income
category.

P Resolution Electronic
copy attached
2 1 2 4
1D Density bonus program
exceeds statutory
requirements by 12
percent.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2
1F Reduced parking
requirements for
residential development
as authorized by
Government Code
sections 65852.2.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2
1G Zoning that allows
mixed uses in one or
more light industrial
zones.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1 2 3
1H Modified development
standards/other
applicable zoning
provisions to promote
greater development
intensity including floor
area ratio and minimum
lot or unit sizes.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1 2 3
1J Other zoning and land
use actions that
measurably support the
P Resolution Electronic
copy attached
1 1
Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted
or
Proposed
Documentation Type
(e.g., resolution,
zoning code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
Acceleration of Housing
Production.
2B Streamlined program-
level CEQA analysis
and certification of
general plans,
community plans,
specific plans with
accompanying
Environmental Impact
Reports (EIR), and
related documents.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2
2G Absence of subjective
development and
design standards with
objective development
and design standards.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1
2I Priority permit
processing or reduced
plan check times for
ADUs/JADUs.

P Resolution Electronic
copy attached
1 1 2 3
2M Other actions that
quantifiably decrease
production timeframes.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1
3A Waiver of residential
development impact
fees.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
3 3
3B Adopted ordinances
that result in less
restrictive requirements
than Government Code
sections 65852.2 and
65852.22.

P Resolution Electronic
copy attached
2 1 2 4
Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted
or
Proposed
Documentation Type
(e.g., resolution,
zoning code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
3E Measures that reduce
costs for transportation-
related infrastructure.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1
3H Other actions that
quantifiably reduce
construction or
development costs.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1
4A Local housing trust
funds.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2
4C Surplus Land Act
program making
publicly owned land
available for affordable
housing.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2 1 3
4E Directed residual
redevelopment funds to
affordable housing.

E Zoning code 1 1
4G Prioritization of local
general funds for
affordable housing.

E Zoning code 1 1
4H Other actions, that
leverage financial
resources for housing.

E Zoning code 1 1

TOTAL 31 12 43
Appendix 4: Examples of Prohousing Policies with Enhancement Factors

If a Prohousing Policy incorporates any of the enhancement factors specified in the Project Proposal Enhancement Factors chart, it will receive extra points as indicated therein.

Examples of such qualifying Prohousing Policies include the following:

Category 1: Favorable Zoning and Land Use

 Rezoning sufficient sites to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation by total or income category, including sites in Location Efficient Communities
 Rezoning sufficient sites to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation by total or income category, including sites in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
 Rezoning to accommodate 125 to 149 percent of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation in downtown commercial corridors or other infill locations.  Expanding density bonus programs to exceed statutory requirements by 10 percent or more in Location Efficient Communities.
 Reducing or eliminating parking requirements for residential development as authorized by Government Code section 65852.2 in Location Efficient Communities.  Increasing allowable density in low-density, single-family residential areas beyond the requirements of state Accessory Dwelling Unit law in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
 Modification of development standards and other applicable zoning provisions to promote greater development intensity in downtown commercial corridors or other infill locations.
 Coupling rezoning actions with policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of lower income households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to lower income households.

Category 2: Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes

 Ministerial approval processes for multifamily housing in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
 Streamlined, program-level CEQA analysis and certification of specific plans in Location Efficient Communities.
 Documented practice of streamlining housing development at the project level in downtown commercial corridors and other infill locations.  Expedited permit processing for housing affordable to lower income households in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).

Category 3: Reduction of Construction and Development Costs

 Fee waivers for affordable housing in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).  Fee waivers or reductions for higher density housing in downtown commercial corridors or other infill locations.
 Measures that reduce costs and leverage financial resources for transportation-related infrastructure or programs in Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).  Adoption of universal design ordinances to increase housing choices and affordability for persons with disabilities in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).  Permitting innovative housing types, such as manufactured homes, recreational vehicles or park models, in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).

Category 4: Providing Financial Subsidies

 Targeting local housing trust funds to acquisition or rehabilitation of existing affordable units, or to affordable units at risk of converting to market rate uses, in Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
 Marketing grants and other financial products for ADUs/JADUs in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
 Utilizing publicly owned land for affordable housing in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
 Establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District or similar local financing tool in a Low Resource or High Segregation & Poverty area (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).  Directing residual redevelopment funds or general funds to conservation or preservation of affordable housing in areas at high risk of displacement.

Appendix 5: Additional Information and Supporting Documentation

Prohousing Designation Program
Application
December 13, 2022
Presented By:

David Vigil, Housing Coordinator VISTA
Megan Hunter, Community Development Director
Community Development Department

Recommended Motion
A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing:
1) the submission of the Prohousing Designation Program (PDP) application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and participation in the Prohousing Designation Program; and
2) the Mayor or designee to execute and enter into any documents and/or agreements, including future amendments, required or deemed necessary or appropriate by HCD to participate in the Prohousing Designation Program
Executive Summary
 Prohousing
Designation
 Demonstrated commitment
to accelerate the
production of housing
 Designation Benefits:
 Scoring advantages
 Grant application
preferences
Affordable Housing Sustainable
Communities Grant
Transformative Climate Communities
Infill Infrastructure Grant Program
Other State housing and non-housing
funding sources
1 2
3 4
Background
 Open Applications
 July 1, 2021
 Threshold Requirements
 Compliant Housing Element
 Current Annual Progress Reports
 Supportive zoning changes
 Housing law compliance
 Designation can be revoked for
failure to stay compliant
Housing
Element
Law
Annual
Progress
Report
No Net
Loss Law
Housing
Accountability
Act
Density Bonus
Law
Fair Housing
Background
 Application Scoring Requirements
30 Point
Minimum
Minimum 1 Item
Per Category
• Favorable zoning and land
use
• Accelerating production
timeframes
• Reducing construction and
development costs
• Providing financial subsidies
Enhanced Scoring
• Demonstrate policies align
with principles
• Additional points per scoring
item
Discussion
 Potential City Score
 53 Points
 Submittal & Review Process
 60 Day Review Period
 Can Submit Multiple Times
 No deadline to submit application
 Cities Awarded the Prohousing
Designation
 Only Sacramento
 22 other jurisdictions in review
 City could be the first Central Coast
jurisdiction awarded designation
One-stop-shop Permitting process
Adaptive Reuse Ordinance
Directed HOME, CDBG, and HAS program
income to affordable housing projects
Salinas Future Growth Area - East Area Specific
Plan
ADU-Preapproved Plans Program
1 2
3 4
5 CEQA Consideration
 Not a project.

Council 2022-2025 Goals & Strategies
 Housing/Affordable Housing
 Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability
 Effective and Culturally Responsive Government
Departmental Collaboration
 Prepared by:
 Housing and Community Development Division
 Consulted with:
 Current Planing Division
 Planning and Project Implementation Division
 Permit Services Division
 Public Works Department
Fiscal and Sustainability Impact
 No Impact to General Fund
 Potential preferences/points in future competitive funding opportunities Questions & Comments
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-690, Version: 1
Acceptance of Federal Aviation Administration and Caltrans Division of Aeronautics Grant Funding for the Salinas Municipal Airport
Approve a Resolution authorizing the application and acceptance of grant funding from the Federal Aviation Administration and Caltrans Division of Aeronautics for the Salinas Municipal Airport Taxiway Bravo and Taxilane Rehabilitation.

City of Salinas Printed on 12/7/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2022
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS, AIRPORT DIVISION
BY: DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROM: BRETT J. GODOWN, C.M., C.A.E., AIRPORT MANAGER
TITLE: ACCEPTANCE OF FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

AND CALTRANS DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS GRANT

FUNDING FOR THE SALINAS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT TAXIWAY

BRAVO AND TAXILANE REHABILITATION (DESIGN ONLY)

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a R esolution authorizing the application and acceptance of grant funding from the Federal Aviation Administration and Caltrans Division of Aeronautics for the Salinas Municipal Airport Taxiway Bravo and Taxilane Rehabilitation (Design Only)

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution authorizing the application and acceptance of grant funding from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Caltrans Division of Aeronautics (Caltrans: California Department of Transportation), for the Salinas Municipal Airport Taxiway Bravo and Taxilane Rehabilitation (Design Only) . The Resolution includes the following actions:

1. Approve submittal of the preliminary and final grant application s for the FAA Airport Improvement Program Number 3-06-0206-36 (AIP 36) and Caltrans;

2. Approve and accept grant offer being received from the FAA and Caltrans, including amendments and change orders, cons istent with Constitutional and Local L aw requirements; and

3. Authorize and empower the City Manager and or Designee to execute on behalf of the City of Salinas all required documentation with respect to the application for and the acceptance of FAA and Caltrans grant funding for the Salinas Municipal Taxiway Bravo and Taxilane Rehabilitation (Design Only), for FAA Airport Improvement Program No. 3-06-0206-36 (AIP 36) upon prior approval as to form by the City Attorney.

Page | 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This report requests Salinas City Council’s approval to apply for and accept grant funding from the Federal Aviation Administration and Caltrans Division of Aeronautics for pavement rehabilitation (design work only) for Taxiway Bravo and various taxilanes on the south side of the airport. The project was included in the most recen t City Council approve Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) to the FAA. The future work is Categorically Exempt (CATEX) from CEQA and NEPA because the project proposes the rehabilitation of an existing public facility that will not expand beyond the existing limits. Funding for the project will be a combination of a Federal Grant (90%), a Caltrans Division of Aeronautics Grant (5%), and a local match (5%).

BACKGROUND:

The work and project are fundamentally a pavement rehabilitation project to remediate and maintain taxiway and taxilane pavement on the south side of the airport. The areas are specifically Taxiway Bravo (“B”), and the taxilanes between City owned hangars – K, L, Q, O, R, S, and T.

The project scope includes crack seal, slurry seal, full-depth reconstruction, milling, filling, and the re-marking of taxiways and taxilanes.

The pavement strength of airfield pavement is critical in maintaining safe aeronautical operations.

Per the 2017 Airport Pavement Management System (APMS) report the pavement condition index (PCI) provided that the existing Taxiway B and taxilanes along the south side of the airfield would require pavement repairs come 2022. The PCI for Taxiway B is expected to be 86 for 2022 but is expected to be lower with an updated PCI evaluation come early 2023 once the APMS has been complete. This proposed project area for Taxiway B covers approximately 212,000 square feet in which this rehabilitation would entail crack seal and slurry coat to strengthen and repair any distresses.

For the adjacent taxilanes to Taxiway B, the pavement conditions PCI ranged 49 (poor) to 70 (fair) for the taxilanes in 2022. These conditions are expected to be lower with an updated PCI evaluation come early 2023 once the APMS has been complete. The report recommends asphalt intermediate repairs, which entail 75% mill and overlay with 25% asphalt concrete rehabilitation. The total taxilane pavement area anticipated to be rehabilitated is approximately 402,000 square feet.

The work will be completed under contract with the Airport’s current firm on retainer, Kimley - Horn and Associates, Inc.

Following the FAA’s acceptance of the initial grant application , City Staff will finalize contract negotiations with an Airport Master Planning Consultant. Following the final negotiation s, Staff will prepare a revised grant application based on the negotiations and submit the revised application to the FAA. Acceptance of the grant based on negotiations will require signatures from the City Manager and the City Attorney’s office.

At the December 6, 2022, Salinas City Council meeting, Council approved the transmit tal of the 2023-2028 Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) to the FAA. The Taxiway Bravo and Taxilane Rehabilitation (Design Only) projects were identified in the ACIP as the fiscal year 2023 project and funding request.

Page | 3
At the December 8, 2022, Airport Commission meeting, the Airport Commission recommended City Council approve the submittal of the preliminary FAA Grant application (AIP36) and that the City Manager be authorized to execute on behalf of the City of Salinas all required documentation with respect to the application for and the acceptance of FAA and Caltrans grant funding, including change orders for the Salinas Municipal Airport Master Taxiway Bravo and Taxilane Rehabilitation (Design Only).

CEQA/NEPA CONSIDERATION:

CEQA:

The City of Salinas has determined that the project is exempt (Categorical Exemption – CATEX) from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15300, Class 1) because the project proposes the rehabilitation of an existing public facility (airport taxiway and taxilane) that will not expand beyond the existing limits. This pro ject will ensure the airport remains a safe operating facility as mandated by the FAA.

NEPA:

Because the City is accepting federal funds for this plan, the work is subject to National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The FAA has determined that a Pavement Management System Update is exempt (Categorical Exemption – CATEX) pursuant to FAA Order 1050.1E paragraph 307o because issuance of a planning grant which does not imply a project commitment, such as airport planning grants qualifies for a categorical exc lusion. This plan will ensure the airport remains a safe operating facility as mandated by the FAA.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The plan complements the City Council’s Goal for Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There will be no impact on the City’s General Fund. Funding to complete this work will come from the FAA, Caltrans, and the Airport Enterprise Fund. Approximately $337,500.00 is being requested from the FAA to fund this project. Federal grants under this program require a 10% match ($37,500.00) from the City of Salinas. In the event a Caltrans Division of Aeronautics Grant Match is available, the match requirements could change to $20,625.00 for the City and $16,875.00 for the State. The estimated project costs are based on estimates provided by Kimley- Horn and Associates and will change based on final negotiations with an Airport Master Planning Consultant.

The estimated revenues and appropriations will be included in the FY 2023-24 Operating and Capital budgets. The following table reflects the funding sources for the appropriations and match requirements:

Page | 4
FY 23-24
Funding Source Appropriations Funding Line Item
FAA 337,500.00
Special Aviation Fund – Federal
5102.50.5340
CalTrans 16,875.00
Special Aviation Fund – State
5101.50.5340
Municipal Airport Fund 20,625.00
Municipal Airport Fund -
6100.50.5340
375,000.00

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION

Approval and execution of the grant will require City Attorney review as to form and the City Manager’s approval.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution

Applications for Federal Assistance - FAA AIP NO. 3-06-0206-36 (AIP 36)

NEPA/CEQA Documents

RESOLUTION NO. _____________________ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF A

GRANT FUNDING FROM THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AND

CALTRANS DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS FOR THE SALINAS MUNICIPAL

AIRPORT TAXIWAY BRAVO AND TAXILANE REHABILITATION (DESIGN ONLY)

WHEREAS, each year the City of Salinas (City ) is required to submit a five -year proposed Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP) to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and California Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics (Caltrans) to allow for appropriate planning and budgeting for future projects; and

WHEREAS, on December 6 , 20 22, the City Council approved the transmittal of the Salinas Municipal Airport five-year ACIP to the FAA and Caltrans; and

WHEREAS, the FAA and Caltrans require the City of Salinas t o submit in this fiscal year a p reliminary and final Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant application for the Salinas Municipal Airport Pavement Management System Update; and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has d etermined that the application and acceptance of grant funding and analysis of the rehabilitation of Taxiway Bravo and various taxilanes is exempt (Categorical Exemption – CATEX) from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15300, Class 1) because the project proposes the rehabilitation of an existing public facility that will not expand beyond the existing limits; and

WHEREAS, the FAA has determined that the rehabilitation of Taxiway Bravo and various taxilanes is exempt (Categorical Exemption – CATEX) pursuant to FAA Order 1050.1E paragraph 307o because the project proposes the rehabilitation of an existing public facility that will not expand beyond the existing limits; and

WHEREAS, on December 8, 2022, the Airport Commission recommended City Council approve the acceptance of the AIP grant agreements being offered by the FAA and Caltrans; and

WHEREAS, the Unites States of America, acting through the Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration and Caltrans Division of Aeronautics is offering a Grant Agreement to the City of Salinas for design work for the rehabilitation of Taxiway Bravo and various taxilanes at the Salinas Municipal Airport; and

WHEREAS, the acceptance of this AIP gran t funding requires the City to adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance of an allocation of AIP grant funds , execution of the grant agreements, and certify the availability of local matching funds in connection with the p roject; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires the City to receive the maximum of available FAA and Caltrans grants to be used for this project.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salinas that:

1. Submittal of preliminary and final application for FAA and Caltrans AIP grants for the Salinas Municipal Airport Pavement Management System Update is hereby approved.

2. Upon a grant offer being received from the FAA and Caltrans, including amendments thereto ar e hereby approved and accepted when received, consistent with Constitutional and local law requirements.

3. The City Manager and or Designee are hereby authorized and empowered to execute on behalf of the City of Salinas all required documentation up on prior approval as to form by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

___________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST:

_____________________________
Patricia Barajas, City Clerk
FAA
San Francisco Airports District Office (SFO-ADO)
FY23 AIP Pre-Application Checklist
Date: 11/28/22Airport: Salinas Municipal Airport
Project Description: Taxiway B and Taxilane Rehabilitation Design We will pursue an FY23 ACIP identified proposed project.

If you plan to pursue an FY23 Project, please complete the following Checklist & submit with App:

No. Document Yes No N/A Comments
Attached

1. Project Schedule (NOTE FAA DUE DATES - pg 3)

2. Standard Form 424 (Application), Form 5100-100 (parts II-IV for airport Development grants), Form 5100-101 (parts II-IV for Planning grants) (Includes project cost breakdown and sketch)

3. Form 5100-100, Part IV – Program Narrative - Provide a clear Narrative and Justification. For proposed pavement projects include a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) information. Provide linear feet for runway and taxiways, and square yards for aprons.

4. Proposed project is currently depicted on an FAA-approved ALP FAA Approved ALP
date ______________________

5. Exhibit A Airport Property Map (attached or previously submitted to ADO) Exhibit A date ______________________

6. Environmental Documentation (NEPA Determination Completed)

7. 60% Design & Construction Safety Phasing Plan (CSPP) completed/submitted Some of the items can be answered by simply checking the “Yes” and “No” boxes, while others require additional information (please provide additional info/justification on Page 2).

Date:

Sponsor’s Designated Representative (Signature) Date:

Please sign and return Application Checklist Pages 1-2 to your assigned ADO Program Manager.

The purpose of this checklist is to identify some requirements and considerations associated with Airport Improvement Program (AIP) fund requests. Airport Sponsors should read and consider each item carefully.

We do not plan on having a project this FY23. The FAA is to

Carryover entitlements into the next

Transfer the Entitlements (Submit separate request to ADO).

LOCATION:

FY23 AIRPORT PROJECT SCHEDULE
No. ITEM
(If appropriate)
DATE

SFO ADO
(Target dates)

COMMENTS
1 Execute Design Contract/Submit to ADO: Also: SOW and IFE/Negotiated Fees 2 Submission NEPA docs for ADO review by: Due 10/01/2022 Complete & Quality 3 Completion of NEPA no later than: 12/31/2022
4 Submission of Pre-Application Checklist to ADO by: 11/30 /2022 5 Preliminary Design at 30% level (submit as needed)
6 Initial CSPP submittal (SMS as applicable)) PM will notify the sponsor when the CSPP is acceptable for FAA LOB review through the
OE/AAA system
7 Design completed at 60% level. CSPP
Complete, SMS & RSAD Complete, as
applicable
01/1/2023
8 Sponsor submits 90% Design level to ADO by:
9 Sponsor submits 100% Design level to ADO by:
10 Sponsor advertises project by:
11 Sponsor opens Bids, evaluation by: 04/15/2023 Design Only: SOW and IFE/Negotiated Fees 12 Bid Guarantee (No. of days) ex. 30, 60 90 days
13 Final Application with amount based on Bids no
later than: 05/01/2023
14 ADO Issues Grant Offer (GO) to Sponsor. After Grant Announcement & If Ready

FAA Form 5100-100 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 1 of 7 U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0569
EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/2023
Application for Federal Assistance (Development and Equipment Projects) PART II – PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION
Part II - SECTION A
The term “Sponsor” refers to the applicant name provided in box 8 of the associated SF-424 form.

Item 1.

Does Sponsor maintain an active registration in the System for Award Management (www.SAM.gov)? Yes No
Item 2.

Can Sponsor commence the work identified in the application in the fiscal year the grant is made or within six months after the grant is made, whichever is later? Yes No N/A Item 3.

Are there any foreseeable events that would delay completion of the project? If yes, provide attachment to this form that lists the events. Yes No N/A Item 4.

Will the project(s) covered by this request have impacts or effects on the environment that require mitigating measures? If yes, attach a summary listing of mitigating measures to this application and identify the name and date of the environmental document(s).

Yes No N/A
Item 5.

Is the project covered by this request included in an approved Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) application or other Federal assistance program? If yes, please identify other funding sources by checking all applicable boxes.

Yes No N/A
The project is included in an approved PFC application.

If included in an approved PFC application,
does the application only address AIP matching share? Yes No The project is included in another Federal Assistance program. Its CFDA number is below.

Item 6.

Will the requested Federal assistance include Sponsor indirect costs as described in 2 CFR Appendix VII to Part 200, States and Local Government and Indian Tribe Indirect Cost Proposals?
Yes No N/A
If the request for Federal assistance includes a claim for allowable indirect costs, select the applicable indirect cost rate the Sponsor proposes to apply:

De Minimis rate of 10% as permitted by 2 CFR § 200.414.

Negotiated Rate equal to % as approved by (the Cognizant Agency) on (Date) (2 CFR part 200, appendix VII).

Note: Refer to the instructions for limitations of application associated with claiming Sponsor indirect costs.

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0569 OMB
EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/2023
FAA Form 5100-100 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 2 of 7

PART II - SECTION B
Certification Regarding Lobbying
The declarations made on this page are under the signature of the authorized representative as identified in box 21 of form SF-424, to which this form is attached. The term “Sponsor” refers to the applicant name provided in box 8 of the associated SF-424 form.

The Authorized Representative certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the Sponsor, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the Authorized Representative shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, ‘‘Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,’’ in accordance with its instructions. (3) The Authorized Representative shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0569 OMB
EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/2023
FAA Form 5100-100 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 3 of 7 PART II – SECTION C
The Sponsor hereby represents and certifies as follows:

1. Compatible Land Use – The Sponsor has taken the following actions to assure compatible usage of land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the airport:

2. Defaults – The Sponsor is not in default on any obligation to the United States or any agency of the United States Government relative to the development, operation, or maintenance of any airport, except as stated herewith:

3. Possible Disabilities – There are no facts or circumstances (including the existence of effective or proposed leases, use agreements or other legal instruments affecting use of the Airport or the existence of pending litigation or other legal proceedings) which in reasonable probability might make it impossible for the Sponsor to carry out and complete the Project or carry out the provisions of the Grant Assurances, either by limiting its legal or financial ability or otherwise, except as follows:

4. Consistency with Local Plans – The project is reasonably consistent with plans existing at the time of submission of this application) of public agencies that are authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport.

5. Consideration of Local Interest – It has given fair consideration to the interest of communities in or near where the project may be located.

6. Consultation with Users – In making a decision to undertake an airport development project under Title 49, United States Code, it has consulted with airport users that will potentially be affected by the project (§ 47105(a)(2)).

7. Public Hearings – In projects involving the location of an airport, an airport runway or a major runway extension, it has afforded the opportunity for public hearings for the purpose of considering the economic, social, and environmental effects of the airport or runway location and its consistency with goals and objectives of such planning as has been carried out by the community and it shall, when requested by the Secretary, submit a copy of the transcript of such hearings to the Secretary. Further, for such projects, it has on its management board either voting representation from the communities where the project is located or has advised the communities that they have the right to petition the Secretary concerning a proposed project.

8. Air and Water Quality Standards – In projects involving airport location, a major runway extension, or runway location it will provide for the Governor of the state in which the project is located to certify in writing to the Secretary that the project will be located, designed, constructed, and operated so as to comply with applicable and air and water quality standards. In any case where such standards have not been approved and where applicable air and water quality standards have been promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, certification shall be obtained from such Administrator. Notice of certification or refusal to certify shall be provided within sixty days after the project application has been received by the Secretary.

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0569 OMB
EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/2023
FAA Form 5100-100 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 4 of 7 PART II – SECTION C (Continued)

9. Exclusive Rights – There is no grant of an exclusive right for the conduct of any aeronautical activity at any airport owned or controlled by the Sponsor except as follows:

10. Land – (a) The sponsor holds the following property interest in the following areas of land, which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport subject to the following exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit “A”. [1] The Sponsor further certifies that the above is based on a title examination by a qualified attorney or title company and that such attorney or title company has determined that the Sponsor holds the above property interests. (b) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, but in any event prior to the start of any construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land on which such construction work is to be performed, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit “A”. [1] (c) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, and if feasible prior to the completion of all construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport as it will be upon completion of the Project, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as
Exhibit “A”. [1]
1 State the character of property interest in each area and list and identify for each all exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests of every kind and nature, including liens, easements, leases, etc. The separate areas of land need only be identified here by the area numbers shown on the property map.

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0569 OMB
EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/2023
FAA Form 5100-100 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 5 of 7 PART III – BUDGET INFORMATION – CONSTRUCTION
SECTION A – GENERAL

1. Assistance Listing Number:

2. Functional or Other Breakout:

SECTION B – CALCULATION OF FEDERAL GRANT
Cost Classification
Latest Approved
Amount
(Use only for
revisions)
Adjustment
+ or (-) Amount
(Use only for
revisions)
Total
Amount
Required

1. Administration expense

2. Preliminary expense

3. Land, structures, right-of-way

4. Architectural engineering basic fees

5. Other Architectural engineering fees

6. Project inspection fees

7. Land development

8. Relocation Expenses

9. Relocation payments to Individuals and Businesses

10. Demolition and removal

11. Construction and project improvement

12. Equipment

13. Miscellaneous

14. Subtotal (Lines 1 through 13)

15. Estimated Income (if applicable)

16. Net Project Amount (Line 14 minus 15)

17. Less: Ineligible Exclusions (Section C, line 23 g.)

18. Subtotal (Lines 16 through 17)

19. Federal Share requested of Line 18

20. Grantee share

21. Other shares

22. TOTAL PROJECT (Lines 19, 20 & 21)
OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0569 OMB
EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/2023
FAA Form 5100-100 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 6 of 7 SECTION C – EXCLUSIONS

23. Classification (Description of non-participating work) Amount Ineligible for
Participation
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g. Total
SECTION D – PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING NON-FEDERAL SHARE

24. Grantee Share – Fund Categories Amount
a. Securities
b. Mortgages
c. Appropriations (by Applicant)
d. Bonds
e. Tax Levies
f. Non-Cash
g. Other (Explain):
h. TOTAL - Grantee share

25. Other Shares
a. State
b. Other
c. TOTAL - Other Shares

26. TOTAL NON-FEDERAL FINANCING
SECTION E – REMARKS
(Attach sheets if additional space is required)
Amount
OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0569
OMB EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/2023
FAA Form 5100-100 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 7 of 7 PART IV – PROGRAM NARRATIVE
(Suggested Format)
PROJECT:

AIRPORT:

1. Objective:

2. Benefits Anticipated:

3. Approach: (See approved Scope of Work in Final Application)

4. Geographic Location:

5. If Applicable, Provide Additional Information:

6. Sponsor’s Representative: (include address & telephone number)

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1

A-1
APPENDIX A. DOCUMENTED CATEX
Airport sponsors may use this form for projects eligible for a categorical exclusion (CATEX) that have greater potential for extraordinary circumstances or that otherwise require additional documentation, as described in the Environmental Orders (FAA Order 1050.1F and FAA Order 5050.4B) .

To request a CATEX determination from the FAA, the sponsor should review potentially affected environmental resources, review the requirements of the applicable special purpose laws, and consult with the Airports District Office or Regional Airports Division Office staff about the type of information needed. The form and supporting documentation should be completed in accordance with the provisions of FAA Order 5050.4B, paragraph 302b , and submitted to the appropriate FAA Airpor 5ts District/Division Office. The CATEX cannot be approved until all information/documentation is received and all requirements have been fulfil led. ________________________________________________________________________________ Name of Airport , LOC ID, and location:

Salinas Municipal Airport (SNS), 30 Mortensen Avenue, Salinas, CA 93905 Project Title:

Proposed Taxiway B & Taxilane Rehabilitation at Salinas Municipal Airport Give a brief, but complete description of the proposed project, including all project components, justification, estimated start date, and duration of the project. Include connected actions necessary to implement the proposed project (including but not limited to moving NAVAIDs, change in flight procedures, haul routes, new material or expanded material sources, staging or disposal areas).

Attach a sketch or plan of the proposed project . Photos can also be helpful.

The pavement strength of airfield pavement is critical in maintaining safe operations at SNS. Per the 2017 Airport Pavement Management System (APMS) report the pavement condition index (PCI) provided that the existing Taxiway B and taxilanes along the southside of the airfield would require pavement repairs come 2022. The PCI for Taxiway B is expected to be 86 for 2022, but is expected to be lower with an updated PCI evaluation come early 2023 once the apms has been complete. This proposed project area for Taxiway B covers approximately 212,000 square feet in which this rehabilitation would entail crack seal and slurry coat to strengthen and repair any distresses.

For the adjacent taxilanes to Taxiway B, the pavement conditions pci ranged 49 (poor) to 70 (fair) for the taxilanes in 2022. These conditions are expected to be lower with an updated PCI evaluation come early 2023 once the apms has been complete. The report recommends asphalt intermediate repairs, which entail 75% mill and overlay with 25% asphalt concrete rehabilitation. The total taxilane pavement area anticipated to be rehabilitated is approximately 402,000 square feet.

Construction staging and will utilize the adjacent aggregate base lay down area behind Hangars L & Q with access via Gate 3 on Moffett Street. Within the airport property the haul route will be minimal and on existing pavement since the staging is adjacent to the work limits. As for any ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-2
pavement removed during construction, it will not be recycled for additional use, it simply is to be disposed offsite at a properly licensed facility.

Give a brief, but complete, description of the proposed project area . Include any unique or natural features within or surrounding airport property .

The airfield location in which the project will take place is located to the west of Runway 8-26 and the adjacent hangars to Taxiway B. The taxilane and hangars are parallel to Moffett Street.

Identify the appropria te CATEX paragraph(s) from Order 1050.1F (paragraph 5-6.1 through 5-6.6) or 5050.4B (Tables 6-1 and 6-2) that apply to the project. Describe if the project differs in any way from the specific language of the CATEX or examples given as described in the Order. 5-6.4
The circumstances one must consider when documenting a CATEX are listed below along with each of the impact categories related to the circumstance. Use FAA Environmental Orders 1050.1F, 5050.4B, and the Desk Reference for Airports Actions, as well as other guidance documents to assist you in determining what information needs to be provided about these resource topics to address potential impacts. Keep in mind that both construction and operational impacts must be included.

Indicate whether or not there would be any effects under the particular resource topic and, if needed, cite available references to support these conclusions . Additional analyses and inventories can be attached or cited as needed.
5-2.b(1) National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) resources Checkpoint YES NO
Are there historic/cultural resources listed (or eligible for listing) on the National Register of Historic Places located in the Area of Potential Effect? If yes, provide a record of the historic and/or cultural resources located therein and check with your local Airports Division/District Office to determine if a Section 106 finding is required.

Does the project have the potential to cause effects ? If yes, describe the nature and extent of the effects.

The project is within the airport property and doesn't forsee any potential effects .

Is the project area undisturbed? If not, provide information on the prior disturbance (including type and depth of disturbance, if available)

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1

A-3
Checkpoint YES NO
Will the project impact tribal land or land of interest to tribes? If yes, describe the nature and extent of the effects and provide information on the tribe affected.

Consultation with their THPO or a tribal representative along with the SHPO may be required.

5-2.b(2) Department of Transportation Act Section 4(f) and 6(f) resources Checkpoint YES NO
Are there any properties protected under Section 4(f) (as defined by FAA Order 1050.1F) in or near the project area? This includes publicly owned parks, recreation areas, and wildlife or waterfowl refuges of national, state or local significance or land from a historic site of national, state or local significance.

Will project construction or operation physically or constructively “use” any Section 4(f) resource? If yes, describe the nature and extent of the use and/or impacts, and why there are no prudent and feasible alternatives. See 5050.4B Desk Reference Chapter 7.

Will the project affect any recreational or park land purchased with Section 6(f) Land and Water Conservation Funds? If so, please explain, if there will be impacts to those properties.

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-4
5-2.b(3) Threatened or Endangered Species
Checkpoint YES NO
Are there any federal or state listed endangered, threatened, or candidate species or designated critical habitat in or near the project area? This includes species protected by individual statute, such as the Bald Eagle.

Non-water based animal species: California Condor, Least Bell's Vireo, Southwestern Willow Flycatcher, Yellow-billed Cuckoo, Monarch Butterfly Water based animal species: California Red-legged Frog, California Tiger Salamander, and Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp
Flowering Plant Species: Marsh Sandwort
No Critical Habitats present. Please see attached USFWS IPaC Resources list for nine migratory bird species. Project area is previously developed with minimal vegetation so no impacts are ex pected to migratory birds.

Does the project affect or have the potential to affect, directly or indirectly, any federal or state-listed, threatened, endangered or candidate species, or designated habitat under the Endangered Species Act? If yes, Section 7 consultation between the FAA and the US Fish & Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, and/or the appropriate state agency will be necessary. Provide a description of the impacts and how impacts will be avoided, minimized, or mitigated. Provide the Biological Assessment and Biological Opinion, if required.

The specific project is on previously disturbed areas (paved).

Does the project have the potential to take birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act? Describe steps to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts (such as timing windows determined in consultation with the US Fish & Wildlife Service).

Construction activities will not take place during migratory periods.

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-5
5-2.b (4) Other Resources
Items to consider include:
a. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act YES NO
Does the project area contain resources protected by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act? If yes, describe any impacts and steps taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts.

b. Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S. YES NO
Are there any wetlands or other waters of the U.S. in or near the project area?

Has wetland delineation been completed within the proposed project area? If yes, please provide U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) correspondence and jurisdictional determination. If delineation was not completed, was a field check done to confirm the presence/absence of wetlands or other waters of the U.S.? If no to both, please explain what methods were used to determine the presence/absence of wetlands.

If wetlands are present, will the project result in impacts, directly or indirectly (including tree clearing)? Describe any steps taken to avoid, minimize or mitigate the impact.

Is a USACE Clean Water Act Section 404 permit required? If yes, does the project fall within the parameters of a general permit? If so, which general permit?

c. Floodplains YES NO
Will the project be located in, encroach upon or otherwise impact a floodplain? If yes, describe impacts and any agency coordination or public review completed including coordination with the local floodplain administrator. Attach the FEMA map if applicable and any documentation.

Airport property is designated as a 500-year floodplain.

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-6
d. Coastal Resources YES NO
Will the project occur in or impact a coastal zone as defined by the State’s Coastal Zone Management Plan? If yes, discuss the project’s consistency with the State’s CZMP. Attach the consistency determination if applicable.

Will the project occur in or impact the Coastal Barrier Resource System as defined by the US Fish and Wildlife Service?

e. National Marine Sanctuaries YES NO
Is a National Marine Sanctuary located in the project area? If yes, discuss the potential for the project to impact that resource.

f. Wilderness Areas YES NO
Is a Wilderness Area located in the project area? If yes, discuss the potential for the project to impact that resource.

g. Farmland YES NO
Is there prime, unique, state, or locally important farmland in/near the project area? Describe any significant impacts from the project.

Does the project include the acquisition and conversion of farmland? If farmland will be converted, describe coordination with the US Natural Resources Conservation and attach the completed Form AD-1006.

There is no farmland in or near project are a and all land will be returned to previous condition upon completion of the project .

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-7
h. Energy Supply and Natural Resources YES NO
Will the project change energy requirements or use consumable natural resources either during construction or during operations?

Will the project change aircraft/vehicle traffic patterns that could alter fuel usage either during construction or operations?

i. Wild and Scenic Rivers YES NO
Is there a river on the Nationwide Rivers Inventory, a designated river in the National System, or river under State jurisdiction (including study or eligible segments) near the project?

Will the project directly or indirectly affect the river or an area within ¼ mile of its ordinary high water mark?

j. Solid Waste Management YES NO
Does the project (either the construction activity or the completed, operational facility) have the potential to generate significant levels of solid waste? If so, discuss how these will be managed.

5-2.b(5) Disruption of an Established Community
Checkpoint YES NO
Will the project disrupt a community, planned development or be inconsistent with plans or goals of the community?
The project is entirely on airport property and is consistent with local plans.

Are residents or businesses being relocated as part of the project?

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-8
5-2.b(6) Environmental Justice
Checkpoint YES NO
Are there minority and/or low-income populations in/near the project area?

Will the project cause any disproportionately high and adverse impacts to minority and/or low-income populations? Attach census data if warranted.

5-2.b(7) Surface Transportation
Checkpoint YES NO
Will the project cause a significant increase in surface traffic congestion or cause a degradation of level of service provided?

Will the project require a permanent road relocation or closure? If yes, describe the nature and extent of the relocation or closure and indicate if coordination with the agency responsible for the road and emergency services has occurred.

5-2.b(8) Noise
Checkpoint YES NO
Will the project result in an increase in aircraft operations, nighttime operations, or change aircraft fleet mix?

Will the project cause a change in airfield configuration, runway use, or flight patterns either during construction or after the project is implemented? The project may re-direct air traffic departing or arriving on Runway 8-26 when work is being completed on adjacent Taxiway B (work area), but it will only be during alotted construction ti mes.

Does the forecast exceed 90,000 annual propeller operations, 700 annual jet operations or 10 daily helicopter operations or a combination of the above? If yes, a noise analysis may be required if the project would result in a change in operations.

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-9
Checkpoint YES NO
Has a noise analysis been conducted, including but not limited to generated noise contours, a specific point analysis, area equivalent method analysis, or other screening method. If yes, provide that documentation.

Could the project have a significant impact (DNL 1.5 dB or greater increase) on noise levels over noise sensitive areas within the 65+ DNL noise contour?

5-2.b(9) Air Quality
Checkpoint YES NO
Is the project located in a Clean Air Act non-attainment or maintenance area?

If yes, is it listed as exempt, presumed to conform or will emissions (including construction emissions) from the project be below de minimis levels (provide the paragraph citation for the exemption or presumed to conform list below, if applicable) Is the project accounted for in the State Implementation Plan or specifically exempted ? Attach documentation.

Does the project have the potential to increase landside or airside capacity, including an increase of surface vehicles?

Could the project impact air quality or violate local, State, Tribal or Federal air quality standards under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 either during construction or operations?

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-10
5-2.b (10) Water Quality
Checkpoint YES NO
Are there water resources within or near the project area? These include groundwater, surface water (lakes, rivers, etc.), sole source aquifers, and public water supply. If yes, provide a description of the resource, including the location (distance from project site, etc.).

Will the project impact any of the identified water resources either during construction or operations? Describe any steps that will be taken to protect water resources during and after construction.

Will the project increase the amount or rate of stormwater runoff either during construction or during operations? Describe any steps that will be taken to ensure it will not impact water quality.

Paved and landscaped areas within the project area will be returned to existing conditions no changes to stormwater is expected .

Does the project have the potential to violate federal, state, tribal or local water quality standards established under the Clean Water and Safe Drinking Water Acts?

Are any water quality related permits required? If yes, list the appropriate permits.

5-2.b(11) Highly Controversial on Environmental Grounds Checkpoint YES NO
Is the project highly controversial? The term “highly controversial” means a substantial dispute exists as to the size, nature, or effect of a proposed federal action.

The effects of an action are considered highly controversial when reasonable disagreement exists over the project’s risks of causing environmental harm. Mere opposition to a project is not sufficient to be considered highly controversial on environmental grounds. Opposition on environmental grounds by a federal, state, or local government agency or by a tribe or a substantial number of the persons affected by the action should be considered in determining whether or not reasonable disagreement exists regarding the effects of a proposed action.

This project went through standard process of city council and has been approved.

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-11
5-2.b(12) Inconsistent with Federal, State, Tribal or Local Law Checkpoint YES NO
Will the project be inconsistent with plans, goals, policy, zoning, or local controls that have been adopted for the area in which the airport is located?

Is the project incompatible with surrounding land uses?

5-2 .b (13) Light Emissions, Visual Effects, and Hazardous Materials a. Light Emissions and Visual Effects YES NO
Will the proposed project produce light emission impacts?

Will there be visual or aesthetic impacts as a result of the proposed project and/or have there been concerns expressed about visual/aesthetic impacts?

b. Hazardous Materials YES NO
Does the project involve or affect hazardous materials?

Will construction take place in an area that contains or previously contained hazardous materials?

If the project involves land acquisition, is there a potential for this land to contain hazardous materials or contaminants?

Will the proposed project produce hazardous and/or solid waste either during construction or after? If yes, how will the additional waste be handled?

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-12
5-2 .b (14) Public Involvement
Checkpoint YES NO
Was there any public notification or involvement? If yes, provide documentation.

Project went through Salinas City Council process for approval.

5-2 .b (15) Indirect/Secondary/Induced Impacts
Checkpoint YES NO
Will the project result in indirect/secondary/induced impacts?

When considered with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, on or off airport property and regardless of funding source, would the proposed project result in a significant cumulative impact?

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-13
Permits
List any permits required for the proposed pro ject that have not been previously discussed. Provide details on the status of permits.

None
Environmental Commitments
List all measures and commitments made to avoid, minimize, mitigate, and compensate for impacts on the environment, which are needed for this project to qualify for a CA TEX.

ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-14
Preparer Information
Point of Contact: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Erin Sheelen) Address: 10 Almaden Boulevard
City: Sn Jose State: CA Zip Code: 95113
Phone: 669-800-1985 Email Address: erin.sheelen @kimley -horn.com Signature: Date:

Airport Sponsor Information and Certification (may not be delegated to consultant) Provide contact information for the designated sponsor point of contact and any other individuals requiring notification of the FAA decision .

Point of Contact : Brett Godown, Airport Manager - Salinas Municipal Airport Address: 30 Mortensen Ave
City: Salinas State: CA Zip Code: 93905
Phone Number : 831-758-7214 Email Address: [email protected] Additional Name(s) : Ad ditional Email Address(es) :

I certify that the information I have provided above is, to the best of my knowledge , correct. I also recognize and agree that no construction activity, including but not limited to site preparation, demolition, or land disturbance, shall proceed for the above proposed project(s) until FAA issues a final environmental decision for the proposed project(s) and until compliance with all other applicable FAA approval actions (e.g., ALP approval, airspace approval, grant approval) has occurred.

Signature: Date:
10/12/22
10/12/22
ARP SOP No. 5.1 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
A-15
FAA Decision
Having reviewed the above information, it is the FAA’s decision that the proposed project (s) or development warrants environmental processing as indicated below.

Name of Airport, LOC ID, and location:

Project Title:

No further NEPA review required. Project is categorically excluded per (cite applicable 1050.1.F CATEX that applies : )
..An Environmental Assessment (EA) is required.
..An Environmental Impa ct Statement (EIS) is required. ..The following additional documentation is necessary for FAA to perform a complete environmental evaluation of the proposed project.

Name: Title:

Responsible FAA Official
Signature: Date:

IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly aected by activities in the project area.

However, determining the likelihood and extent of eects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specic (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specic (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.

Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS oce(s) with jurisdiction in the dened project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.

Location
Monterey County, California
Local oce
Ventura Fish And Wildlife Oce
 (805) 644-1766
 (805) 644-3958
[email protected]
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC
2493 Portola Road, Suite B
Ventura, CA 93003-7726

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.

The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of inuence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly aected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a sh population even if that sh does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water ow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential eects to species, additional site-specic and project-specic information is often required.

Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local oce and a species list which fullls this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an ocial species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local eld oce directly.

For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an ocial species list by doing the following:

1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.

2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.

3. Log in (if directed to do so).

4. Provide a name and description for your project.

5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.

Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the sheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).

Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.

1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Actare threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ). 1 2

2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an oce of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.

The following species are potentially aected by activities in this location:

Birds
Amphibians

NAME STATUS
California Condor Gymnogyps californianus
There is nal critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8193
Endangered
Least Bell's Vireo Vireo bellii pusillus
Wherever found
There is nal critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5945
Endangered
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii extimus Wherever found
There is nal critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6749
Endangered
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus
There is nal critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3911
Threatened

NAME STATUS
California Red-legged Frog Rana draytonii
Wherever found
There is nal critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2891
Threatened

Insects
Crustaceans
Flowering Plants
Critical habitats
Potential eects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.

There are no critical habitats at this location.

Migratory birds
California Tiger Salamander Ambystoma californiense
There is nal critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2076
Threatened

NAME STATUS
Monarch Buttery Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate

NAME STATUS
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta lynchi
Wherever found
There is nal critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/498
Threatened

NAME STATUS
Marsh Sandwort Arenaria paludicola
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2229
Endangered

The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may nd in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur o the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.

BREEDING SEASON
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.

Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.

1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.

2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.

Additional information can be found using the following links:

Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take- migratory-birds
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/les/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation- measures.pdf
1 2
NAME
Allen's Hummingbird Selasphorus sasin
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9637
Breeds Feb 1 to Jul 15

Belding's Savannah Sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis
beldingi
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 15
Bullock's Oriole Icterus bullockii
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Breeds Mar 21 to Jul 25
California Thrasher Toxostoma redivivum
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.

Breeds Jan 1 to Jul 31
Common Yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas sinuosa
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2084
Breeds May 20 to Jul 31
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680
Breeds Jan 1 to Aug 31
Lawrence's Goldnch Carduelis lawrencei
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9464
Breeds Mar 20 to Sep 20
Nuttall's Woodpecker Picoides nuttallii
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9410
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 20
Oak Titmouse Baeolophus inornatus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9656
Breeds Mar 15 to Jul 15

Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.

Probability of Presence()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4- week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey eort (see below) can be used to establish a level of condence in the presence score. One can have higher condence in the presence score if the corresponding survey eort is also high.

How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:

1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.

2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.

To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.

Tricolored Blackbird Agelaius tricolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3910
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 10
Wrentit Chamaea fasciata
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.

Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 10

no data survey eort breeding season probability of presence Breeding Season ()
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.

Survey Eort ()
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.

To see a bar's survey eort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.

No Data ()
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.

Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas o the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Allen's
Hummingbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Belding's
Savannah
Sparrow

BCC - BCR
Bullock's Oriole

BCC - BCR
California
Thrasher
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Common
Yellowthroat

BCC - BCR
Golden Eagle
Non-BCC
Vulnerable
Lawrence's
Goldnch
BCC Rangewide
(CON)

Nuttall's
Woodpecker

BCC - BCR
Oak Titmouse
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Tricolored
Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Wrentit
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.

Nationwide Conservation Measuresdescribes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.

To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measuresor permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specied location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasetsand is queried and ltered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identied as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Actrequirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to oshore activities or development.

Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.

It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.

What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.

Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.

How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the proles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specied. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:

1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacic Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);

2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and

3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Actrequirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. oshore energy development or longline shing).

Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, eorts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.

Details about birds that are potentially aected by oshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area o the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also oers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results les underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelfproject webpage.

Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Studyand the nanotag studiesor contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.

What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permitto avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.

Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey eort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey eort is the key component. If the survey eort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey eort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to conrm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be conrmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject to the restrictions on federal expenditures and nancial assistance and the consultation requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). For more information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Oce or visit the CBRA Consultations website. The CBRA website provides tools such as a ow chart to help determine whether consultation is required and a template to facilitate the consultation process.

There are no known coastal barriers at this location.

Data limitations
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted on the ocial CBRS maps. The boundaries depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary (i.e., within the "CBRS Buer Zone" that appears as a hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do not clearly intersect a unit, you may contact the Service for an ocial determination by following the instructions here: https://www.fws.gov/service/coastal-barrier-resources-system-property-documentation Data exclusions

CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location of the unit). The true seaward extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the oshore areas of units (e.g., dredging, breakwaters, oshore wind energy or oil and gas projects) may be subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact [email protected].

Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.

There are no refuge lands at this location.

Fish hatcheries
There are no sh hatcheries at this location.

Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.

For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.

Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.

This location overlaps the following wetlands:

FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND

NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on-site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.

Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identied based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classication established through image analysis.

The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verication work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.

Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or eld work. There may be occasional dierences in polygon boundaries or classications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.

Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tubercid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.

Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may dene and describe wetlands in a dierent manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to dene the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.

Persons intending to engage in activities involving modications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specied agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may aect such activities.

Palustrine

RIVERINE
Riverine
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#22-691, Version: 1
Professional Services Agreement with BFS Landscape Architects Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Salinas and BFS Landscape Architects in an amount not to exceed $1,755,389 for Design, Program and Construction Management for Closter Park, El Gabilan Play Lot, and two universal playgrounds (one at Northgate Park and one at Williams Ranch Park); and authorizing an increase of up to $1,000,000 to the General Fund appropriation and use of General Fund balance for design, program, construction management and construction of the above projects.

City of Salinas Printed on 12/7/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2022
DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (LCS)
FROM: KRISTAN LUNDQUIST, LCS DIRECTOR
BY: ANA AMBRIZ, MANAGEMENT NALYST
TITLE: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY

OF SALINAS AND BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS (BFS)

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Salinas and BFS Landscape Architects in an amount not to exceed $1,755,389 for Design, Program and Construction Management for Closter Park, El Gabilan Play Lot, and two universal playgrounds (one at Northgate Park and one at Williams Ranch Park); and

2. Authorizing an increase of up to $1,000,000 to the General Fund appropriation and use of General Fund balance for design, program, construction management and construction of the above projects.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On May 20, 2022, the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Design, Project and Construction Management and Community Engagement Assistance for a series of park projects, including Closter Park, El Gabilan Play Lot, Universal Playgrounds at Northgate and Williams Ranch and the Cesar Chavez Trail Improvement Project.

On June 21, 2022, the City received four (4) Statements of Qualifications (SOQ). City Staff rated and ranked the SOQs and invited the top three (3) firms for interviews. After the interviews BFS Landscape Architects was selected as the most qualified for these projects. Following the selection, BFS submitted a proposal, which was reviewed by City Staff. The proposal includes scope of work, budget, and schedule for:

1. Project management

2. Community engagement

3. Design development

4. Management of the selection of a Design Build Entity

5. Construction oversight
Page | 2

After extensive discussions between City staff and BFS, city staff decided to pull the Cesar Chavez Trail Project and continue discussions for the remainder of the projects. A final proposal was submitted at a cost not to exceed of $1,755,389. The final scope, budget and schedule is provided as Exhibit B to the Professional Services Agreement, which is attached to this staff report.

BACKGROUND:

In 2019, the City of Salinas completed the Parks, Recreation, and Library Services Master Plan (PRLMP). The development of this Master Plan was led by a Steering Committee of stakeholders, residents, and organizational leaders and involved extensive public engagement in the planning process. 98% of City residents answering a survey felt that public parks, recreational opportunities, and library services are important or essential to the quality of life in Salinas; more than half (57%) rated the park and recreation system as “fair” or “poor.” City parks and open spaces were the foci of one of the fou r Open House sessions, with participants placing high priorities on safety and maintenance, trails for walking and biking, water play, dog parks, and family/social gatherings.

More than 80% of community survey respondents during the Master Plan process c onsidered upgrading existing parks a high or top priority. As one respondent said, “Before expanding, please start by improving what we already have. Our parks are a treasure, but they need A LOT of love and improvements.”

One outcome of the Master Plan was the development of a 20-year Capital Improvements Plan for Park and Facility Projects, and Closter Park was ranked #1 in terms of needing improvement. The park received the highest rankings in all six criteria – significance, funding leverage, community need, safety/security, usage/benefit, and location/demographics. The main improvements outlined were renovations of a restroom and concession stand; installation of a new restroom; installation of skate elements; repairs to chain link fences and baseball backstops; regarding the ball fields; adding plantings, dugouts, batting cages, and several ADA and safety elements; and numerous repairs and refurbishing.

Following the recommendations of the Master Plan and development of the Capital Improvement Plan for Park and Facility Projects, staff has worked diligently to secure funding sources to improve the condition of existing parks. In early 2021, LCS submitted a Prop 68 application to The California Department of Parks and Recreation Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) for the Closter Park Revitalization Project. In early 2022, OGALS notified LCS of its Closter Park Revitalization Project selection and awarded $6.8 Million Dollars for a comprehensive renovation of the park.

El Gabilan Tot-Lot

In November 2019, the City Council unanimously accepted the Alisal Vibrancy Plan (AVP) as a strategic planning document. The AVP is an action-oriented, comprehensive strategy for Salinas’ Alisal (East Salinas) neighborhoods. The Plan’s purpose is to commun icate the collective vision, goals, and desires of those who live, work, worship, and shop in the Alisal. In October 2021, staff presented the AVP Implementation Plan and Budget for the approximately $3 million dollars the Page | 3
City Council appropriated in the FY 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Budget for immediate and short-term implementation activities. The AVP Implementation Plan, developed in collaboration with the AVP Implementation Committee, prioritizes short -term activities to improve the cleanliness, appearance, infrastructure, and parks and open space in the Alisal, and to promote economic development of the Alisal.

One of the projects under the parks and open space bucket is the resurface existing asphalt and incorporation of a new half basketball court and/or other playground games (i.e., hopscotch, four- square, etc.).

Universal Playgrounds

On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), which provided the City of Salinas with $51,567,313 in relief funds. In September 2021, the City Council allocated ARPA funds for a number of government service projects, including $2 million dollars for playground structures, park benches and bar -be-que grills, the majority of which was to be spent in the 93905 and 93906 zip codes which were hit hardest by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The City of Salinas has 35 playgrounds located in parks/facilities across the City. An assessment of the playgrounds was conducted as part of the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Master Plann ing effort and the majority of the playgrounds were found to be in fair and/or good condition. The playground at Williams Ranch Neighborhood Park was found to be in poor condition and in need of replacement. On September 20, 2022, the Council approved sy stemwide playground repairs, focusing on zip codes 93905 and 93906. In addition to the design and installation of four (4) new playground structures, two of them (Northgate and Williams Ranch) included in BFS’ professional service agreement.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The approval of a professional service agreement is not considered a project per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines , however the projects under this agreement are considered projects.

Closter Park Revitalization – The Closter Park Revitalization project, includes demolishing and replacing existing structures of substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity, qualifies as a Class 2 Categorical Exemption (Section 15302 Replacement or Reconstruction) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

El Gabilan Play Lot – The El Gabilan Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption because it involves infill development within an urbanized area as identified in Categorical Exemption Class 32; Section 15332 (b).

Universal Playgrounds – The Universal Playground projects, include the replacement of existing structures of substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity, qualifies as a Class 2 Categorical Exemption (Section 15302 Replacement or Reconstruction) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Page | 4

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

These actions support the Council’s strategic goals of “Youth and Seniors” , “Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability” , “Public Safety” , “Economic Development” and implement PRLMP and AVP priorities.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

LCS worked with Public Works and Community Development to develop the RFQ, rate and rank the SOQs, interview the top firms, and negotiate a final scope of work and budget pr oposal. LCS also worked with Finance and City Manager's office to identify additional funds for these projects.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Closter Park Revitalization: Prop 68 funds will support most of the pre-development / soft cost of the scope of work. The remainder will be covered by the General Fund appropriation.

El Gabilan Tot -Lot: AVP Implementation Funds (CIP 9246) will cover all the cost associated with this project.

Universal Playgrounds: LCS’ ARPA allocation (3911.55.8171) will cover most of the cost of these projects. The remainder will be covered by the increased General Fund appropriation.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Professional Service Agreement
Exhibit B: Scope of Services
Page | 1

RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL APPROVING

A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF SALINAS AND BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

WHEREAS, the Capital Improvements Plan for Park and Facility Projects ranked Closter Park the #1 needing improvement; and

WHEREAS, Closter Park received $6.8 Million from the California Department of Parks and Recreation Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS); and

WHEREAS, the AVP Implementation Plan, devel oped in collaboration with the AVP Implementation Committee, prioritizes short-term activities to improve parks and open space in the Alisal; and
WHEREAS, one of the projects under the park s and open space bucket is the resurface existing asphalt and incorporation of a new half basketball court and/or other playground games (i.e., hopscotch, four-square, etc.) at El Gabilan Tot-Lot; and

WHEREAS, in September 2021, the Council approved the design and installation of four (4) new playground structures, two of them include d in BFS’ (Northgate and Williams Ranch) professional service agreement; and
WHEREAS, BFS Landscape Architects submitted a proposal in the amount not to exceed $1,755,389; and
WHEREAS, the approval of a professional service agreement is not considered a project per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Salinas and BFS Landscape Architects and authorizes the City Manager to enter into such agreement.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 13
th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Page | 2

APPROVED:

_______________________
K i m b l e y C r a i g , M a y o r

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
C l o s t e r P a r k S c o p e . d o c x
Scope of Services
Closter Park
November 04, 2022
Project Description
Closter Park is a recipient of the Prop 68 grant funds which requires construction completion by the end of 2024. Per the request for qualifications document and the conceptual site plan distributed by the City of Salinas. The proposed improvement and renovations include the following:
 Renovation and potential relocation of the ballfields. There is to be a little league ballfield and a youth/adult ballfield. In addition to renovated ballfields new structures including restrooms, bleachers, dugouts, batting cages, concession stand with storage are to be located in close proximity to the ballfields. Other site amenities include drinking fountains, pitchers’ mounds and bases  New amphitheater seating at the existing Plazita to watch performances and events
 New ‘Youth Plaza’ with seating, game tables and an adjacent street skate spot.  New street skate spot with integrated art component
 New event space for farmer’s market and special events. The event space is to include one pavilion and one gazebo. Electrical connections are to be made available for vendors and special events. Also included is a large Santa Maria style grill
 New Play Area for 2-5 and 5-12 year olds. Play area to be thematic and to include custom play structures created by local artisans and to include a designated music area
 New Picnic Area adjacent to the play-area
 Preservation of the Tree of Life with low garden walls and up-lighting  New Basketball Court paving and fencing. Install colorful sport court paving and add fencing around the court (integrate art within the fencing if feasible)  Renovation of horseshoe pits
 New ½ mile fitness loop that is 10’ wide and runs along the perimeter of the park.

Loop to have distance markers and to include fitness stations along the trail.

In addition to the following scope below, please find included detail proposals from G7ei Inc and 360 PSM.

G7ei Inc will be providing to the City Project Management, Budget Management, Grant Management and Construction Management Services. G7ei Inc will acting as a representative to the City.

1.0 COMMUNITY/LCSC AND CITY COUNCIL ENGAGEMENT & ILLUSTRATIVE MATERIALS (PROJECT DURATION)

1.01 Community Engagement Meeting 01: Meet with Owner and PM to review agenda and goals of first community. BFS to prepare visual image boards for facilitating dot surveys exercise so that the City can gather the community’s preferences on skate spot features, playground themes, playground equipment and supporting site amenities. City staff to facilitate Community Meeting. In addition to park intercept outreach, BFS to prepare a digital survey material through Google Forms. Online surveys to be made available through City website and social media sites.

1.02 Community Engagement Meeting 02: Salinas City Council Meeting. Owner, PM and Design Team to present to City Council the park site plans and details. Meeting will allow for council to review the park construction documents prior to going out to bid. Meeting noticing to be posted to Project webpage, City webpage and City social media accounts. BFS to prepare powerpoint presentation in coordination with Owner and PM.

Exhibit B- Scope of Service
B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 2 o f 1 0

1.03 Bid Award Meeting 03: Salinas City Council Meeting: City Council to vote to award the construction project to the selected construction bidder. Meeting noticing to be posted to Project webpage, City webpage and City social media accounts. BFS to prepare powerpoint presentation in coordination with Owner and PM.

1.04 Illustrative Site Plan: BFS to prepare and submit an illustrative site plan at 50% Schematic Task and continue to update the illustrative site plan through until the Bid Award Task.

1.05 3D Model and Renderings: BFS to prepare a 3D model of the proposed park improvements using sketch-up modeling software. BFS to coordinate with Owner and PM on the selection of (4) model views to render and submit for City promotional and

2.0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN (OCTOBER 2022 – FEBRUARY 2023)
Scope and fee assumes biweekly coordination meetings with Owner and PM

2.01 Attend project start up meeting. Review scope of services, community engagement process, schedule, and anticipated construction budget with Owner and Project Manager [PM].

Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of start up meeting, BFS to submit project schedule

2.02 Visit Closter Park with Owner and PM. Review and discuss existing site conditions and photograph for in-house design reference.

Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary of site visit and provide recommendations for anticipated site improvements.

2.03 Surveying consultant to prepare and submit site topographic survey for park Survey include aerial mapping and limited site survey information as determined by the park sites’ limit of work. BFS to prepare composite base plan for Design Team use.

Deliverable: Submit site topographic survey information (in AutoCAD base format) to Owner for future use.

2.04 Geotechnical consultant to conduct soil borings and infiltration testing at park project site and provide laboratory results and recommendation report.

Deliverable: Submit geotechnical report and recommendations to Owner for future use.

2.05 Arborist consultant to prepare and submit arborist review and recommendations for park project site.

Deliverable: Submit arborist report and recommendation to Owner for future use.

2.06 Electrical consultant to review existing electrical and data infrastructure at project site and make provide findings in report. Consultant to determine if new PG&E and/or AT&T service is required.

Deliverable: Submit Electrical Existing Conditions report to Owner for future use.

2.07 Obtain soils sample(s) from the Project site. Commission soils analysis from qualified soils analyst or laboratory for fertilizer and amendment applications of new plantings.

2.08 Coordinate and discuss site storm water management strategies with PM and Civil Engineer.

Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of storm water strategy discussion

2.09 Prepare materials and submit materials for Community Engagement Meeting 01. See above task for approach

2.10 Prepare and submit 50% Schematic Plans for Owner / PM. Based on community engagement meeting and ongoing reach and information gathering. Prepare estimate of probable construction costs.

Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 50% schematic plans and construction cost estimate B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 3 o f 1 0

2.11 Review with Owner and PM the 50% Schematic Plans, and construction budget Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of 50% SD review discussion

2.12 Based on 50% SD review comments, prepare and submit 100% SD Plans include estimate of probable construction costs.

Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 100% SD plans and construction cost estimate for review by Owner/PM and City’s Community Development Department.

2.13 Submit 100% SD Plan for review by City of Salinas Community Development Department. Design Team to prepare package and application.

Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 100% SD plans for review by City’s Community Development Department.

3.0 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (FEBRUARY 2023 – APRIL 2023)
Scope and fee assumes biweekly coordination meetings with Owner and PM

3.01 BFS to complete a Design Manual to document research, products and cost of proposed design. Elements of the design manual to include:

A. Prefabricated Restroom Buildings, Concession Stand, Gazebo. Building Finishes and Façade options to be included
B. Site Furnishings and Lighting Fixtures
C. Site Paving
D. Play Features
E. Skate Feature:

F. Ballfield Amenities
G. Irrigation System Recycle and Reuse-
H. Site Grading and Drainage
I. Planting palette
Deliverable: Prepare and submit Design Manual to Owner / PM

3.02 Design Manual Review. Meeting with City via online web conferencing. Prepare meeting minutes for City and Design Team
Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of Design Manual review discussion

3.03 Design Development Coordination across the disciplines to prepare the 50% Design Development Documents
A. Civil Engineer to coordinate with the Design Team

1. utility connections (water and sanitary sewer)

2. prepare stormwater management plan-coordinate with BFS on capturing site runoff and creating onsite treatment areas to meet local codes
B. Electrical Engineer to coordinate with the Design Team

1. Electrical connections at tree of life, restroom and concessions buildings farmer’s market area, and lighting fixtures

2. PG&E service application
C. Skate Feature Designer to coordinate with Design Team

1. Layout of features on the project site, coordinate with Landscape Architect and Civil how features meet site conditions and drainage of features into stormwater system B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 4 o f 1 0

3.04 Design Team to prepare and submit 50% Design Development Drawings. Submittal to include Outline Technical Specifications, and Cost Estimate. Drawings package to include A. Cover Sheet
B. Existing Conditions Plan
C. Demolition Plan
D. Construction Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Construction Details
G. Irrigation Plan
H. Planting Plan
I. Irrigation and Planting Details
J. Signage and Interpretation Plan
K. Signage and Interpretation Details
L. Utility Plan
M. Stormwater Management Plan
N. Parking Lot Layout and Grading Plan
O. Utility and Stormwater Details
P. Electrical Plan
Q. Electrical Details
R. Skate Feature Plans
S. Skate Feature Details
Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 50% DD plans, construction cost estimate and product notebook

3.05 BFS to provide internal review of Design Development documents. Review Design Team documents for design consistency and coordinate conflicts with Design Team members as appropriate.

3.06 Meet with Owner and PM to review 50% Design Development Package and Cost Estimate.

Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of 50% DD review discussion

3.07 Based on 50% Design Development review comments, prepare 100% Design Development plans. Update cost estimate of construction budget.

Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 100% DD plans and construction cost estimate

3.08BFS to provide internal review of Design Development documents. Review Design Team documents for design consistency and coordinate conflicts with Design Team members as appropriate.

3.09Meet with Owner and PM to review 100% Design Development Package and Cost Estimate. Deliverable:

Prepare meeting minutes for City and Design Team
Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of 100% DD review discussion

4.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS & PERMITTING (APRIL 2023 – SEPTEMBER 2023) Scope and fee assumes biweekly coordination meetings with Owner and PM

4.01 Based on approved Design Development drawings, prepare and submit electronically 75% complete Construction Drawings (CDs), submittal includes technical specifications and estimate of probable construction costs.

B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 5 o f 1 0 Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 75% CD plans, construction cost estimate and specifications.

4.02 BFS to provide internal review of Construction Documents. Review Design Team documents for design consistency and coordinate conflicts with Design Team members as appropriate.

4.03 Meet with Owner and PM to review 75% Construction Document Package and Cost Estimate. Deliverable:

Prepare meeting minutes for City and Design Team
Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of 75% DD review discussion

4.04 Prepare and attend Community Engagement Meeting 02: Salinas City Council. See above task for approach.

Deliverables:

BFS to prepare presentation materials and submit to Owner and PM for review. BFS to prepare community noticing materials.

BFS to assist in presentation at City Council Meeting
BFS to prepare and submit summary and recommendations based on City Council responses and community comments

4.05 Based upon Owner / PM review, complete 90% CDs / Permit Set. Prepare estimate of probable construction costs and technical specifications in CSI format. Prepare building permit application and compile all required reports and information. Submit electronically and review with Owner / PM. Coordinate with building permit application with PM
Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 90% CD plans, construction cost estimate and specifications.

4.06 Compile and distribute agency plan-check comments for Owner / PM and sub-consultant review.

4.07 Based on plan-check comments, complete 100% CDs / Bid-set drawings, Technical Specifications, and Bid- Form.

A. Owner / PM will distribute copies of bid-documents.

B. Arrange for printing and distribution of copies of bid-documents if required by the Owner / PM as an additional reimbursable cost.

Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 100% CD plans, construction cost estimate and specifications for bidding.

5.0 BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION (OCTOBER 2023 – DECEMBER 2023) Owner / Construction Manager (CM) shall have the primary responsibility for the bidding and construction review phase of the project, including testing and inspection coordination, payment request processing and all related items.

5.01 Attend pre-bid meeting with Owner / CM and potential bidders to discuss bidding procedures.

A. Prepare meeting minutes for the Owner / CM

5.02 Provide technical assistance during the bid process, including preparation of Addenda. Respond to questions as directed by Owner / CM. Provide written or graphic clarification as appropriate.

A. Assist Owner / CM in evaluating bids received.

5.03 Prepare and attend Bid Award Salinas City Council Meeting 03. See above task for approach.

Deliverables:

B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 6 o f 1 0 A. BFS to prepare presentation materials and submit to Owner and PM for review. BFS to prepare community noticing materials.

B. BFS to assist in presentation at City Council Meeting

5.04 Provide the Contractor a Conform Set of Drawings incorporating all addenda revisions.

5.05 Attend pre-construction meeting with Owner / CM and Contractor to discuss construction procedures.

A. Prepare meeting minutes for the Owner / CM

5.06 Respond to Requests for Information (RFI); furnish Clarifications, Revisions, and Architects Supplementary Instructions (ASI) to the Owner / CM; any change orders will be prepared by Owner / CM.

5.07 Review and process submittals, samples and Shop Drawings. Review proposed substitutions if any, for conformance to drawings and technical specifications.

5.08 Review and comment on Contractors Pay Applications and Proposed Change Orders.

5.09 Attend [24] bi-weekly project (OAC) meetings and on-site construction reviews followed by written field reports and/or meeting minutes. Assumes [9]-months construction and [3]-month landscape maintenance.

Reviews to include:

A. Substantial Completion Review – at start of landscape maintenance B. Punch-list Check – during landscape maintenance
C. Final Review – at end of landscape maintenance

5.10 Prepare Record Drawings based on As-Built drawings provided by the Contractor.

5.11 Close-out project including administrative documentation.

6.0 ARTIST COORDINATION (BEGINS AT DD THROUGH CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

6.01 Discuss with City the intent of installing public art in the project site. Determine budget and schedule for public art pieces. Meet with City to identify site location options and coordinate installation of art pieces into/onto park program features.

A. Prepare meeting minutes for City
B. BFS to prepare site plan diagram indicating public art locations

6.02 BFS to incorporate installation/mounting details into Construction Document Package. Production and installation of art pieces to be managed by City. BFS to coordinate with selected Contractor impacts on construction schedule.

6.03 BFS to provide coordination for art piece installation between City, Contractor, and artist(s).

B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 7 o f 1 0

ADDITIONAL SERVICES

13.1 Additional coordination/site meetings as authorized by the City.

13.2 Additional community meetings as authorized by City A. Preparation of outreach and presentation materials
B. Facilitation of community meeting
C. Translation services for materials and meeting discussion to be a reimbursable expense.

D. Summary of community meeting

13.3 Additional graphics and renderings

EXCLUSIONS
The following are excluded from our scope of services.

1. CEQA document preparation and approvals.

2. Architectural Review Board Submittal

3. Notice of Intent (NOI), Signed Certification Statement, and First Annual Fee, if required, will be included as a requirement for the Contractor.

4. Off-site improvements, except for utility connections.

5. Testing fees for construction testing procedures, i.e., compaction testing, percolation testing, construction staking verification.

6. Division 1 (General Conditions and Special Provisions) Project Specifications.

7. Printing of drawings on Mylar.
-END -

SCHEDULE
TASK 1.0: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT &ILLUSTRATIVE

MATERIALS
DATES
Meetings and Illustrations integrated into Tasks Below
TASK 2.0: SCHEMATIC DESIGN DATES

2.01-Attend project start up meeting October 10th, 2022

2.02-Park Visit October 10, 2022

2.03-Prepare and submit survey and topo October 3 – November 4, 2022

2.04-Prepare and submit geotechnical report October 3 – December 2, 2022

2.05-Prepare and submit arborist report October 3 -October 28, 2022

2.06-Pepare and submit electrical existing conditions
report
October 3- October 28, 2022

2.07-Obtain soil samples October 10 – November 4, 2022

2.08-Coordinate storm water management strategies December 5, 2022

2.09-Community Engagement Meeting 01, see above December 3, 2022

2.10 Prepare and submit 50% SD Plans November 7, 2022-January 6, 2023

2.11 Review 50% SD Plans January 16, 2023

2.12 Prepare and submit 100% SD Plans, January 9 – February 3, 2023

2.13Submit 100% SD Plans-to City Community
Development Department
February 10, 2023
B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 8 o f 1 0 TASK 3.0: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DATES

3.01-Prepare and submit Design Manual February 6-March17, 2023

3.02-Review Design Manual March 27, 2023

3.03-DD Coordination February 6 -

3.04-Prepare and submit 50% DD Plans February 6 – March 31, 2023

3.05-Design Team Internal QAC April 3-April 7, 2023

3.06-Review 50% DD Plans April 10, 2023

3.07-Prepare and submit 100% DD Plans April 3 – April 28, 2023

3.08-Design Team Internal QAC May 1 – May 5, 2023

3.09-Review 100% DD Plans May 8, 2023
TASK 4.0: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS& PERMITTING DATES

4.01-Prepare and submit 75% CD Plans May 1-June 2, 2023

4.02-Design Team Internal QAC June 5- June 9, 2023

4.03-Review 75% CD Plans June 12, 2023

4.04-Community Engagement Meeting 02, see above June 20, 2023

4.05-Prepare and submit 90% CD Plans June 5 August 25 2023

4.06-Distribute plan check comments August 28, 2023

4.07-Prepare and submit 100% CD Plans September 15, 2023 TASK 5.0: BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION

ADMINISTRATION
DATES

5.01-Attend pre-bid meeting October 2, 2023

5.02-Provide bid assistance October 2, -October 27, 2023

5.03-Bid Award Meeting 03, see above December 5, 2023

5.04-Prepare and submit conform set November 6 – December 1, 2023

5.05-Attend pre-construction meeting January 22, 2024

5.06-Review and respond to RFIS January 22 – October 4, 2024

5.07-Review and respond to Submittals January 22 – October 4, 2024

5.08-Review and respond to Cos January 22 – October 4, 2024

5.09-Attend QAC meetings January 22 – December 6, 2024

5.10-Prepare record drawings December 13, 2024

5.11-Project Closeout December 6 – December 20, 2024
TASK 6.0: ARTIST COORDINATION DATES

6.01-Coordination meeting with Owner/PM November 21. 2022

6.02-Detail coordination with Artist February 13 – July 21, 2023

6.03-Construction coordination with Artist and
Contractor
January 22 – October 4, 2024
B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 9 o f 1 0

COMPENSATION

1.0 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT & ILLUSTRATIVE MATERIALS ............................................$33,050 BFS (PRIME).........................................................................................................................................................................................$27,440 WORMHOUDT (SKATE) ..................................................................................................................................................................$3,210 LUPITA JAMIE (TRANSLATOR) ....................................................................................................................................................$2,400

2.0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN...................................................................................................................$139,593 BFS (PRIME).........................................................................................................................................................................................$43,205 SANDIS (CIVIL & SURVEY) ...........................................................................................................................................................$48,980 AURUM (ELECTRICAL) ..................................................................................................................................................................$11,552 WORMHOUDT (SKATE) ......................................................................................................................................................................$590 ONO (ARBORIST) ................................................................................................................................................................................$5,600 MACK 5 (COST ESTIMATING)......................................................................................................................................................$4,866 EARTH SYSTEMS (GEOTECHNICAL)......................................................................................................................................$24,800

3.0 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT............................................................................................................$146,748 BFS (PRIME).........................................................................................................................................................................................$83,410 SANDIS (CIVIL & SURVEY) ...........................................................................................................................................................$29,450 AURUM (ELECTRICAL).....................................................................................................................................................................$7,386 WORMHOUDT (SKATE)................................................................................................................................................................$10,800 MACK 5 (COST ESTIMATING) ...................................................................................................................................................$15,702 D.C. URFER (STRUCTURAL)...........................................................................................................................................................$4,320

4.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS & PERMITTING.................................................................$255,098 BFS (PRIME)......................................................................................................................................................................................$143,940 SANDIS (CIVIL & SURVEY) ...........................................................................................................................................................$48,910 AURUM (ELECTRICAL) ..................................................................................................................................................................$13,824 WORMHOUDT (SKATE)................................................................................................................................................................$12,200 MACK 5 (COST ESTIMATING) ...................................................................................................................................................$23,264 D.C. URFER (STRUCTURAL)........................................................................................................................................................$12,960

5.0 BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION...............................................................$217,590 BFS (PRIME)......................................................................................................................................................................................$164,180 SANDIS (CIVIL & SURVEY) ...........................................................................................................................................................$31,010 AURUM (ELECTRICAL) ..................................................................................................................................................................$11,280 WORMHOUDT (SKATE) ..................................................................................................................................................................$6,800 D.C. URFER (STRUCTURAL)...........................................................................................................................................................$4,320

6.0 ARTIST COORDINATION..............................................................................................................$14,580 BFS (PRIME).........................................................................................................................................................................................$14,580

7.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT..........................................................................................................$103,944 G7ei Inc Scope and Fee

8.0 BUDGET MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................$28,688 G7ei Inc Scope and Fee
B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 1 0 o f 1 0

9.0 GRANT MANAGEMENT................................................................................................................$44,528 G7ei Inc Scope and Fee

10.0 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ...........................................................................................$416,376 G7ei Inc Scope and Fee

11.0 LABOR COMPLIANCE: PRECONSTRUCTION............................................................................$1,500 360 PSM Scope and Fee

12.0 LABOR COMPLIANCE: CONSTRUCTION...........................................................................$28,643.76 360 PSM Scope and Fee

13.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES

13.1 Additional Coordination/Site Meetings...........................................................................$400/meeting ` 13.2 Additional Community Meetings..................................................................................$10,000/meeting

13.3 Additional Graphics/Renderings.........................................................................................................$Hourly REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES BUDGET ...................................................................................................................................$6,500 TOTAL (NIC ADDITIONAL SERVICES) ............................................................................$1,436,838.76 HOURLY RATES AND REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES: See current Standard Schedule of Compensation. All costs for printing, special delivery, horticultural soils analysis, Owner business licenses and fees, consultant services, and other costs directly related to the project would be billed as a reimbursable expense at our cost plus a fifteen percent administration charge.

Attachments: Standard Schedule of Compensation, dated 5/2022 Notice: Landscape Architects are regulated by the State of California. Any questions concerning a Landscape Architect may be referred to the Landscape Architects Technical Committee at: Landscape Architects Technical Committee, 2420 Del Paso Rd, Unit 105, Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 575-7230.
1580 West El Camino Real, Suite 12, Mountain View 94040 Q (650) 326-6622 P Q (650) 963-9421 F 425 Paciﬁc Street, Suite 201, Monterey, California 93940 Q (831) 646-1383 P Q (831) 373-8653 F BFS Landscape Architects Q bfsla.com
landscape
architects

Standard Schedule of Compensation
May 2022

GENERAL
The following list of fees and reimbursable expense items shall be used in providing services within our agreement and may be annually adjusted, upon issuance of an updated Standard Schedule of Compensation:

Principal $220/hour
Associate Principal $205/hour
Associate $190/hour
Project Manager $170/hour
Assistant Project Manager $160/hour
Designer $140/hour
Assistant Designer $120/hour
Design/Graphics Intern $45/hour
Word Processor/Clerical $85/hour

ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Any additional presentations, drawings or documents not identified in the Scope of Services will be considered additional services. Additional services are provided only with prior authorization and on an hourly basis unless otherwise approved.

REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
All costs for printing and plotting, special delivery, mileage, and other costs directly related to the project will be accounted as a reimbursable expense at our cost plus a fifteen percent administration charge.

City of Salinas Parks Revitalization and Improvement Projects P22-39

Page 1 of 1 ends

Closter Park - Salinas Parks Improvement
and Renovation Plan
BFS
Landscape Architects
BFS
Landscape Architects
BFS
Landscape Architects
BFS
Landscape Architects
BFS
Landscape Architects
G7EI INC
CM/PM
SANDIS
Civil
SANDIS
Civil
SANDIS
Civil
SANDIS
Civil
SANDIS
Civil
SANDIS
Civil
SANDIS
Civil
SANDIS
Civil
SANDIS
Civil
SANDIS
Civil
AURUM
Electrical
AURUM
Electrical

WORMHOUDT
Skate

ONO CONSULTING
Arborist
MACK 5
Cost Estimating
MACK 5
Cost Estimating
MACK 5
Cost Estimating
MACK 5
Cost Estimating
D.C. URFER
Structural Engineer
Lupita Jaime
Translation/Interpretati
on

EARTH SYSTEMS
Geotechnical Engineer
360 PSM
Labor Compliance
360 PSM
Labor Compliance
SANDIS
Civil
Larry Foster
Prinicpal In Charge
Elizabeth Matz
Associate Principal
Steve Eichner
Associate
Landscape Designer Clerical Paul Greenway
President/Sr PM
Chad Browning
Senior PM
Steve Yazalina
Project Manager
Thuy Nguyen
Project Engineer 1
Seth Talkington
Design Engineer 2
Technical Drafting Pool
Drafting
Field Crew (2 Man) Survey Sup. PLS Survey PM Level 1 Project Surveyor Level 2 Survey Tech Level 2 Najib Anwary
Sr. Project Manager
Michael Meza
Electrical Designer
Principal Project Manager Draftsperson Clerical Frank Ono President Administrative Electrical Cost Planner MPFR Cost Planner Senior Cost Planner Principal Engineer Lupita Jaime Catalina Ferreto President
Catalina Ferreto
President
Sam Clay
Project Engineer 3
$220 per hour $205 per hour $190 per hour $140 per hour $85 per hour $248 per hour $285 per hour $195 per hour $150 per hour $125 per hour $115 per hour $325 per hour $285 per hour $195 per hour $145 per hour $125 per hour $188 per hour $173 per hour $145.00 per hour $110.00 per hour $90.00 per hour $60.00 per hour $175.00 per hour $90.00 per hour $199.00 per hour $199.00 per hour $199.00 per hour $180.00 per hour $0.00 per hour $0.00 per hour $132.61 per hour $125.00 per hour $180 per hour Task Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Dollars

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT &

ILLUSTRATIVE MATERIALS

1.01-Community Engagement Meeting 01 $0.00 8 $1,640.00 2 $380.00 16 $2,240.00 8 $680.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 $580.00 $0.00 13 $1,170.00 4 $240.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,730.00

1.02-Community Engagement Meeting 02 $0.00 8 $1,640.00 $0.00 16 $2,240.00 4 $340.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 8 $1,160.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 $60.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,240.00

1.03 -Bid Award Meeting 03 $0.00 4 $820.00 $0.00 16 $2,240.00 4 $340.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,200.00

1.04-Illustrative Site Plan Rendering $0.00 4 $820.00 $0.00 24 $3,360.00 24 $2,040.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,220.00

1.05-3D Model and Renderings $0.00 4 $820.00 $0.00 56 $7,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,660.00 $33,050.00

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

2.01-Attend project start up meeting $0.00 4 $820.00 4 $760.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 $752.00 $0.00 2 $290.00 $0.00 2 $180.00 2 $120.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,922.00

2.02-Park Visit $0.00 6 $1,230.00 6 $1,140.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 8 $1,504.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,874.00

2.03-Prepare and submit survey and topo $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 8 $1,120.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 32 $10,400.00 2 $570.00 8 $1,560.00 8 $1,160.00 32 $4,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $18,810.00

2.04-Prepare and submit geotechnical
report
1 $220.00 1 $205.00 1 $190.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $28,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $29,015.00

2.05-Prepare and submit arborist report $0.00 1 $205.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 32 $5,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,805.00

2.06-Pepare and submit electrical existing
conditions report
$0.00 1 $205.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 20 $3,760.00 32 $5,536.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,501.00

2.07-Obtain soil samples $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 $560.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $560.00

2.08-Coordinate storm water management
strategies
$0.00 4 $820.00 $0.00 2 $280.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,100.00

2.09-Community Engagement Meeting 01,
see above
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

2.10-Prepare and submit 50% SD Plans 1 $220.00 4 $820.00 4 $760.00 60 $8,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 $285.00 16 $3,120.00 24 $3,600.00 24 $3,000.00 24 $2,760.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 $2,880.00 $25,845.00

2.11-Review 50% SD Plans $0.00 2 $410.00 2 $380.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $790.00

2.12-Prepare and submit 100% SD Plans 2 $440.00 8 $1,640.00 16 $3,040.00 60 $8,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 $90.00 $0.00 $0.00 24 $4,776.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $18,386.00

2.13-Submit 100% SD Plans for City
Community Development review
$0.00 4 $820.00 4 $760.00 8 $1,120.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 $285.00 16 $3,120.00 24 $3,600.00 24 $3,000.00 24 $2,760.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 $2,880.00 $18,345.00

2.14-Project Administration by Prime
Consultant
$0.00 16 $3,280.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 $1,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,640.00 $139,593.00

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

3.01-Prepare and submit Design Manual $0.00 4 $820.00 8 $1,520.00 24 $3,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,700.00

3.02-Review Design Manual $0.00 2 $410.00 $0.00 2 $280.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $690.00

3.03-DD Coordination $0.00 24 $4,920.00 24 $4,560.00 8 $1,120.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,600.00

3.04-Prepare and submit 50% DD Plans 4 $880.00 24 $4,920.00 32 $6,080.00 80 $11,200.00 4 $340.00 $0.00 1 $285.00 16 $3,120.00 24 $3,600.00 24 $3,000.00 16 $1,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 $752.00 17 $2,941.00 8 $1,160.00 6 $660.00 32 $2,880.00 5 $300.00 $0.00 1 $90.00 8 $1,592.00 7 $1,393.00 24 $4,776.00 12 $2,160.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 $2,880.00 $56,849.00

3.05-Design Team Internal QAC $0.00 24 $4,920.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,920.00

3.06-Review 50% DD Plans $0.00 4 $820.00 2 $380.00 2 $280.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,480.00

3.07-Prepare and submit 100% DD Plans 4 $880.00 24 $4,920.00 24 $4,560.00 80 $11,200.00 4 $340.00 $0.00 1 $285.00 16 $3,120.00 24 $3,600.00 24 $3,000.00 16 $1,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 $752.00 17 $2,941.00 10 $1,450.00 6 $660.00 37 $3,330.00 6 $360.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 $2,880.00 $46,118.00

3.08-Design Team Internal QAC $0.00 24 $4,920.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,920.00

3.09-Review 100% DD Plans $0.00 4 $820.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 $90.00 8 $1,592.00 7 $1,393.00 24 $4,776.00 12 $2,160.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,831.00

3.10-Project Administration by Prime
Consultant
$0.00 16 $3,280.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 $1,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,640.00 $146,748.00

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS &

PERMITTING

4.01-Prepare and submit 75% CD Plans 8 $1,760.00 40 $8,200.00 80 $15,200.00 200 $28,000.00 8 $680.00 $0.00 2 $570.00 24 $4,680.00 40 $6,000.00 32 $4,000.00 24 $2,760.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 7 $1,316.00 20 $3,460.00 8 $1,160.00 6 $660.00 20 $1,800.00 4 $240.00 $0.00 1 $90.00 10 $1,990.00 8 $1,592.00 28 $5,572.00 24 $4,320.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 $2,880.00 $96,930.00

4.02-Design Team Internal QAC $0.00 24 $4,920.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,920.00

4.03-Review 75% CD Plans $0.00 4 $820.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $820.00

4.04-Community Engagement Meeting 02,
see above
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

4.05-Prepare and submit 90% CD Plans 8 $1,760.00 40 $8,200.00 80 $15,200.00 200 $28,000.00 16 $1,360.00 $0.00 2 $570.00 16 $3,120.00 24 $3,600.00 16 $2,000.00 16 $1,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 7 $1,316.00 18 $3,114.00 8 $1,160.00 6 $660.00 25 $2,250.00 5 $300.00 $0.00 1 $90.00 10 $1,990.00 8 $1,592.00 28 $5,572.00 24 $4,320.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 $2,880.00 $90,894.00

4.06-Distribute plan check comments $0.00 8 $1,640.00 $0.00 8 $1,120.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,760.00

4.07-Prepare and submit 100% CD Plans 8 $1,760.00 40 $8,200.00 24 $4,560.00 80 $11,200.00 16 $1,360.00 $0.00 2 $570.00 16 $3,120.00 24 $3,600.00 16 $2,000.00 16 $1,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 8 $1,504.00 18 $3,114.00 8 $1,160.00 7 $770.00 20 $1,800.00 4 $240.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 24 $4,776.00 24 $4,320.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 $2,880.00 $58,774.00 $255,098.00

BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION

ADMINISTRATION

5.01-Attend pre-bid meeting $0.00 4 $820.00 4 $760.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 $752.00 $0.00 1 $145.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,477.00

5.02-Provide bid assistance $0.00 16 $3,280.00 16 $3,040.00 32 $4,480.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2 $290.00 $0.00 $0.00 2 $120.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11,210.00

5.03-Bid Award Meeting, see above $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

5.04-Prepare and submit conform set 4 $880.00 16 $3,280.00 16 $3,040.00 40 $5,600.00 4 $340.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,140.00

5.05-Attend pre-construction meeting $0.00 4 $820.00 4 $760.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 $145.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.5 $30.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,755.00

5.06-Review and respond to RFIS 4 $880.00 40 $8,200.00 80 $15,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 22 $4,136.00 $0.00 1 $145.00 $0.00 2 $180.00 4 $240.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 12 $2,160.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $31,141.00

5.07-Review and respond to Submittals 4 $880.00 40 $8,200.00 40 $7,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 $3,008.00 $0.00 1 $145.00 $0.00 2 $180.00 4 $240.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 12 $2,160.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $22,413.00

5.08-Review and respond to Cos $0.00 40 $8,200.00 16 $3,040.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11,240.00

5.09-Attend QAC meetings 16 $3,520.00 180 $36,900.00 180 $34,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2 $570.00 24 $4,680.00 64 $9,600.00 80 $10,000.00 16 $1,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 14 $2,632.00 $0.00 4 $580.00 38 $4,180.00 $0.00 3 $180.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 24 $4,320.00 $113,202.00

5.10-Prepare record drawings $0.00 4 $820.00 8 $1,520.00 40 $5,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,940.00

5.11-Project Closeout $0.00 8 $1,640.00 $0.00 $0.00 8 $680.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 $752.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,072.00 $217,590.00

ARTIST COORDINATION

6.01-Coordination meeting with
Owner/PM
$0.00 4 $820.00 $0.00 4 $560.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,380.00

6.02-Detail coordination with Artist $0.00 16 $3,280.00 $0.00 24 $3,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,640.00

6.03-Construction coordination with Artist
and Contractor
$0.00 32 $6,560.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,560.00 $14,580.00

PROJECT MANAGEMENT, CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT & LABOR COMPLIANCE

7.0-Project Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $103,944.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $103,944.00

8.0-Budget Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $28,688.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $28,688.00

9.0-Grant Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,528.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,528.00

10.0-Construction Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $416,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $416,376.00

11.0-Labor Compliance - Pre Construction $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 12 $1,500.00 $0.00 $1,500.00

12.0-Labor Compliance - Construction $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 216 $28,643.76 $0.00 $0.00 $28,643.76 $623,679.76 TOTAL (FEE) 64 $14,080.00 789 $161,745.00 677 $128,630.00 1094 $153,160.00 132 $11,220.00 0 $593,536.00 12 $3,420.00 144 $28,080.00 248 $37,200.00 240 $30,000.00 152 $17,480.00 32 $10,400.00 2 $570.00 8 $1,560.00 8 $1,160.00 32 $4,000.00 122 $22,936.00 122 $21,106.00 66 $9,570.00 69 $7,590.00 153 $13,770.00 44.5 $2,670.00 32 $5,600.00 5 $450.00 36 $7,164.00 30 $5,970.00 152 $30,248.00 120 $21,600.00 0 $2,400.00 0 $28,400.00 216 $28,643.76 12 $1,500.00 136 $24,480.00 $1,430,338.76 $1,430,338.76 Reimbursable Allowance $0.00 $6,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 TOTAL $14,080.00 $168,245.00 $128,630.00 $153,160.00 $11,220.00 $593,536.00 $3,420.00 $28,080.00 $37,200.00 $30,000.00 $17,480.00 $10,400.00 $570.00 $1,560.00 $1,160.00 $4,000.00 $22,936.00 $21,106.00 $9,570.00 $7,590.00 $13,770.00 $2,670.00 $5,600.00 $450.00 $7,164.00 $5,970.00 $30,248.00 $21,600.00 $2,400.00 $28,400.00 $28,643.76 $1,500.00 $24,480.00 $1,436,838.76 $1,436,838.76

Proposal for City of Salinas
Closter Park
Project Management
Budget Management
Grant Management

Paul H. Greenway, PE
President
Senior Project Manager
G7ei Inc.
525 Strawberry Road
Royal Oaks, CA 95076

Elizabeth Matz

BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
425 Pacific Street #201
Monterey, CA 93940

Staff Augmentation
Project Management
Construction Management
www.G7ei.com
September 7, 2022

Elizabeth Matz

BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
425 Pacific Street #201
Monterey, CA 93940

Subject: Proposal for Project Management, Budget Management and Grant Management for City of Salinas City Park Closter Park Project

Dear Ms. Matz:

G7ei Inc., a State of California Certified Small Business, appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal for
Project Management, Budget Management and Grant
Management for City of Salinas City Park Revitalization and Improvement Projects . We look forward to assisting the BFS Team delivery of parks projects.

G7 offers the Team a highly qualified and very experienced team:
• Paul H. Greenway, PE, President of G7, Senior Project Manager. Paul has three decades of experience helping clients with the delivery of services on over 100 municipal projects including serving as Project Manager on an American Public Works Association, APWA, 2018 National Award-Winning Project.

Thank you for the opportunity to submit this Proposal. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at 831-400-8964 or [email protected]
Sincerely,
G7ei Inc.

Paul H. Greenway
President
G7ei Inc.
525 Strawberry Road
Royal Oaks, CA 95076
Small Business, State of California, Certification #2012609

Page 1 ends

Project Management Organization and Approach

Project Management, Budget
Management and Grant
Management for Closter Park
Project Understanding
The G7 team understands the City is seeking assistance with Project Management for implementation of the Closter Park Project. We have reviewed the City's Scope of Services in the Request for Qualifications and understand these services. Our goal is to serve as an extension of City staff in the delivery of services.

Project Manager
The primary responsibility of our Project Manager will be to act as a representative of the Owner during the project. The Project Manager will focus on the delivery of the project on-budget and on-schedule with the highest possible quality of final the project.

Project Description and Project Goals
One of the key steps is to have a well-defined project description. This step is key that allows the stakeholders to pursue the same goal. It keeps the team and stakeholders focused on the desired outcome. We will work with the City to make sure project descriptions are well-defined, and the project goals are clear as early as possible in the process.

Review of Existing Information
G7 will review existing plans, planning documents, regulatory rules and other materials relating to the project(s). This data collection phase of the project is necessary to understand the context of the existing improvements and to understand the deficiencies in the current conditions as well as proposed improvements.

Project Development and Design Phase
The G7 Team will develop an Action Plan to assist keeping the team on track for the project. We will define roles and responsibilities, establish regular meetings, develop agendas with goals, identify deliverables, preparing staff reports as needed.

During this phase of the project, the Project Manager will develop the overall schedule with target milestones as well as a project budget. Other tasks include coordinate or attend meetings with City representatives, stakeholders, the design consultant or regulatory agencies. The Project Manager will prepare correspondence with the design consultant. Review documents submitted by the design consultant and provide

Page 2 ends

Project Management Organization and Approach
reviews of the design consultants work on constructability and compliance with the design contract requirements.

Pre-Construction Phase Services:

Services may also include the construction bidding phase of assisting with the coordination of design consultants bid packages into City format, conducting pre-bid conferences, and responding to bidders' questions during the advertisement phase of the project. The work may also include evaluation of bids, preparation of bid summary and recommendations for processing award of the contract. The services may include constructability reviews and preparation of staff reports for the City.

Project Management
Services will include coordination with City staff, prime consultant, for the preparation of design plans and construction bid documents. Action items on project deliverables and tracking of schedule of grant deadlines.

Deliverable: Actions items prepared for project management tracking to keep project on budget and on schedule.

Budget Management
Services will include develop a budget spreadsheet that tracks design phase services, construction phase services, construction costs, city costs, and city reimbursements.

Deliverable: Budget Spreadsheet and tracking invoices and State payments to the City

Grant Management
Services will include reviewing project conformance to Proposition 68 implementation in accordance with the State of California Grant Administration Guide. Grant administration duties will include preparation of payment request forms, grant expenditure forms, coordination with City finance staff on invoices paid.

Deliverable: Payment request forms and grant expenditure forms.

1-Nov-22
Senior Project Manager
Project Manager III
Management Analyst II
1 –Project Management
Project management 48 472 520.0 $103,944
2 –Budget Management
Senior Project Manager 16 96 112.0 $22,688
Senior Management Analyst 40 40.0 $6,000
2 –Grant Management 0.0
Senior Project Manager 16 48 64.0 $13,328
Senior Management Analyst 208 208.0 $31,200
Hours 80.0 616.0 248.0 328.0TOTAL
Total Resource Hours
Total Resource Costs
177,160$
$195 $1502023 Rates* $248
City of Salinas
Closter Park
Project Management, Budget Management, Grant Management 11/1/2022

Proposal for City of Salinas
Closter Park
Construction Management
Construction Inspection

Paul H. Greenway, PE
President
Senior Project Manager
G7ei Inc.
525 Strawberry Road
Royal Oaks, CA 95076

Elizabeth Matz

BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
425 Pacific Street #201
Monterey, CA 93940

Staff Augmentation
Project Management
Construction Management
www.G7ei.com
September 7, 2022

Elizabeth Matz

BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
425 Pacific Street #201
Monterey, CA 93940

Subject: Proposal for Construction Management and Construction Inspection for City of Salinas Closter Park Project

Dear Ms. Matz:

G7ei Inc., a State of California Certified Small Business, appreciates the opportunity to submit this Proposal for Construction Management for City of Salinas Closter Park Project.

We look forward to assisting the BFS Team delivery of parks projects.

G7 offers the Team a highly qualified and very experienced team:
• Paul H. Greenway, PE, President of G7, Senior Construction Manager. Paul has three decades of experience helping clients with the delivery of services on over 100 municipal projects including serving as Project Manager on an American Public Works Association, APWA, 2018 National Award-Winning Project.

Thank you for the opportunity to submit this Proposal. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at 831-400-8964 or [email protected]
Sincerely,
G7ei Inc.

Paul H. Greenway
President
G7ei Inc.
525 Strawberry Road
Royal Oaks, CA 95076
Small Business, State of California, Certification #2012609

Page 1 ends

Construction Management and Inspection
Construction Management and Construction
Inspection for Closter Park

Construction Phase Services
The Construction Management effort will include the following duties. Construction manager duties which are described below.
• Tracking, Updating and coordination of schedule and budget • Construction Progress Reports will be prepared monthly and submitted to the City with reports including status of contract time and overall progress of the contractor.
• Coordination with inspection staff
• Coordination with the Architect on RFI
• Determine the validity and justification for all change orders and provide recommendations to the City.
• Negotiate costs with the contractor
• Prepare CCO and process through the City
• Track all CCOs against project contingency balance.
• Construction Progress Reports will be prepared monthly and submitted to the City with reports including status of contract time and overall progress of the contractor.
• Conduct construction progress meetings and keep meeting agendas will prepare minutes with action items promptly.
• Interpret the plans and specifications and review construction activities to verify that the work is in accordance with the contract documents and applicable regulatory requirements.
• Be the leader in pursuing resolutions of day-to-day construction issues raised.

This will include coordination with inspectors, Design Engineers, Contractors, and the City as required to reach resolution.
• Obtain and maintaining key specification referenced standards that relate to the project.
• Monitor project permit conditions and related expiration dates and inform the City and Contractor when non-compliance is observed.
• Review and process contractor’s monthly payment request with the project inspector(s). He will provide a preliminary payment request to the City’s Project Manager for review prior to submittal of the final monthly payment request. • Coordinate and verify the tracking of record drawings. This will include reviewing the contractor’s record drawings ongoing basis and verifying the final submission to City.
• Coordinate the preparation of a detailed project punch list at substantial completion of the project and coordinate with project stakeholders.

Page 2 ends

Construction Management and Inspection
• Verification of submitted final payment requests from the Contractor following filing of Notice of Completion.
• Review and certify that the Contractor’s project record drawings are complete and accurate prior to contract acceptance.
• Develop recommendations for notice of substantial completion and contract acceptance, compile and submit the appropriate final documentation to the City in electronic and paper files as needed.
• Preparation of a Final Construction Report formatted will be included in the closeout package to the City.
• Be proactive in identifying potential concerns and work toward cost-effective solutions.

Construction Inspection efforts will include:

• Perform Daily Inspection. Construction Inspector will review the construction for compliance to the plans and specifications; collect and verify material certification and tickets.
• Perform Photo Documentation. The Construction Inspector will assist with photos of construction site conditions.
• Prepare written daily field reports for submittal to the Project Manager/Construction
Manager. Reports will include types of contract work performed, the labor and equipment utilized, quantities of materials constructed, significant conversations with the Contractor constructing the work, and a discussion of any work not conforming to the plans and specifications.
• Construction inspector will track time of contractor for extra work or change order work.
• This proposal does not include Materials Testing, Construction Staking or Field Survey, however, the construction inspector will coordinate with materials testing firm hired separately by the City and City surveyors.
• Construction Inspector will prepare a Punch List after substantial completion of the work.

Construction Management and Construction Inspection
Services will include Construction Management and Construction Inspection of project to confirm construction is in accordance with plans and specifications and construction project is delivered in accordance with the construction budget and working day schedule.

Deliverable: Construction Field reports, Construction Management Action Items

1-Nov-22
Senior Construction Manager
Construction Manager III
Construction Inspector III
1 –CM and Inspection
Construction Inspector 2,080.0 2,080.0 $312,000
Senior Construction Manager 48.0 472.0 520.0 $104,376
Hours 48.0 472.0 2,080.0
TOTAL
Total Resource Hours
Total Resource Costs
416,376$
$195 $1502024 Rates $257
2,600.0
City of Salinas
Closter Park
Construction Management and Inspection
11/1/2022
Closter Park Revitalization

Proposal for Labor Compliance Monitoring
For City Park Revitalization
And Improvement
Projects
City of Salinas

Elizabeth Matz | Associate Principal

BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
425 Pacific Street #201, Monterey CA 93940
831.646.1383 p | 831.582.7723 c| [email protected]

Catalina Ferreto
President
360PSM
Labor Compliance Monitoring Officer- Analyst
18110 Stonehaven Dr,
Salinas CA, 93908

360PSM

09-08-2022
Elizabeth Matz | Associate Principal

BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
425 Pacific Street #201, Monterey CA 93940
831.646.1383 p | 831.582.7723 c

Subject: Proposal for Labor Compliance Monitoring Services City Park Revitalization and Improvement Projects for City of Salinas for Closter Park Revitalization

Dear Elizabeth:

360PSM is a Certified Woman Minority Business Enterprise (WMBE) founded in 2018. State of California Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE #45909), California Small Business for Purpose of Public Works (SB -PW) certification (ID 2019749), registered wi th the State of California Department of Industrial Relations, Registration Number: PW-LR-1000653803.

Supporting the BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS team will be Catalina Ferreto, President of 360PSM. 360PSM recently provided non -engineering support services on a Federally Funded infrastructure project and on a State of California funded infrastructure project . 360PSM is committed to working with the BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS team on the City Park Revitalization and Improvement Projects for City of Salinas
360PSM will provide the following services for the Pre-construction phase and Construction phase of the project.

• Labor Compliance
• Community outreach

We look forward to working with you and the other team members on this important project for Construction Management and Inspection Services for City Park Revitalization and Improvement Projects for City of Salinas. The main point of contact for this project is Catalina Ferreto and she can be reached by phone at 831-500-1263 by mail at 18110 Stonehaven Dr, Salinas CA, 93908
or via email at [email protected]

Catalina Ferreto
360PSM
President
831-500-1263
[email protected]

CLOSTER PARK
Project Description and Approach
Labor compliance monitoring

Project Understanding
BFS Landscape Architects team interested in Professional Labor Compliance Monitoring Services for City of Salinas. Project Title: City Park Revitalization and Improvement Projects for Closter Park. The City of Salinas has a population of 165,000 people, is the largest city in the County of Monterey and serves as the county seat. Known as the “salad bowl of the world”, the community is surrounded by agricultural lands which drive its economy and shape its heritage. The city lies about 100 miles south of San Francisco and approximately 10 miles inland of the Monterey Peninsula. Salinas has grown tremendously over the past sixty years, with a population of less than 30,000 in 1960. Diversity is one of Salinas’ strengths, with 75 percent of residents identifying as Hispanic/Latino.

The City of Salinas requires to provide the City with a final Project Concept, Project Schedule, Final Design, Construction Plans and Specifications, cost estimate, project management, design, bidding and implementation for each of the
Projects.

Closter Park Revitalization: To be planned, designed and developed in accordance with the scope and conceptual design provided to the State of California Natural Resources Agency, Department of Parks and Recreation Proposition 68-funded grant. Closter Park is identified as a 7-acre, community park located in the Alisal neighborhood of East Salinas, a densely populated and critically underserved neighborhood with the highest poverty levels and highest violent crime rates in the city. The Consultant would be responsible for re-engaging the community and confirming that the existing Conceptual Design is what the community envisions for the project.

It’s the City’s desire that every major recreation and sports amenity be replaced or renovated at Closter Park. Improvements will benefit the community and enhance the health and quality of life for residents of all ages while providing spaces for educational and cultural celebrations/programming and/or other venues, which will also increase economic opportunities for local vendors. The proposed improvements include:

1. Ballfields and Amenities. Both
the Little League ballpark and
the ballpark for youth and
adults will be regraded and
will have new restrooms,
bleachers, dugouts, bases and
pitcher’s mounds, batting
cages, a concession stand,
storage area, water bottle
fillers, and drinking fountains.

All ballfield amenities would
be located right next to the
ballfields.

CLOSTER PARK
Project Description and Approach
Labor compliance monitoring

2. Amphitheater Seating.

Amphitheater seating at the
Plazita for audience viewing
comfort during community events
(music, festivals, etc.).

3. Youth Plaza. A plaza would be
created for older kids, to include
tables, benches, and age-
appropriate games such as ping
pong and cornhole. Street-skate elements would be incorporated nearby along with a public art opportunity for youth.

4. Farmers Market/Multi-use Event Space. This space would include a pavilion with seating and electrical connections for vendors and event patrons. A gazebo with an outside kitchen or large Santa Maria style barbecue would be built nearby.

5. Larger Themed and Colorful Play Area/Climbable Art and Musical Sound-Making Plaza. A larger themed and colorful play area for ages 2-5 and 5-12 will be built to replace the existing play structures. In addition, there will be new picnic/seating area with community-made art nearby.

6. Tree of Life. Protective measures such as garden wall and up-lighting opportunities.

7. Basketball Courts. Added color surfacing to existing basketball courts with improved/decorative fencing around the courts.

8. Horseshoe Pits. Improvement of current horseshoe pits.

9. Lighting Enhancements. Security lighting, up-lighting in existing mature trees, lighting at new park entrance points.

10. Landscaping Enhancements. Upgrades to existing landscaping, including planting of new mature moderate/large trees (37) and non-invasive, drought-tolerant plants, including directing storm drains to bioretention areas.

CLOSTER PARK
Project Description and Approach
Labor compliance monitoring

11. 10’ Wide Fitness Loop. Add a 10’ wide walking/running loop along the perimeter of the park, which measures exactly a half mile long and will be marked as such and integrate fitness stations (6-12) throughout the trail.

12. Public Art Engagement/Integration. Several of the Closter Park Revitalization improvements will integrate public and community-made art throughout the park adding that beautification touch and sense of placemaking to the community as well as creating an opportunity of engaging the youth and local artists.

Contractual Scope of Services

BFS Landscape Architects requested Labor compliance monitoring and Community outreach for the Project. 360PSM proposes to perform the following services:

Labor Compliance PRE-Construction Phase

Community outreach (through project duration)

1) Community intercept outreach meeting

Services will include participation and helping during community meeting.

Deliverable: Parks and Recreation Commission Meetings translation and interpretation.

Labor Compliance Monitoring for Pre - construction support services and during Construction services

Review the Prime Contractor and the Subcontractor payroll documents, including wage rates, fringe benefits, and forms and documents required by the State of California.

Deliverable: Monthly tracking document for compliance resolution

Labor Compliance Monitoring/ Construction Phase

1. Review contract provisions and labor compliance requirements with the project team.

2. Determine the specific labor standards and dates of effect for wages for the construction project

3. Set up and maintain all compliance files and documents relating to prevailing wage activities;

CLOSTER PARK
Project Description and Approach
Labor compliance monitoring

4. Set up and maintain labor compliance files tracking the prime contractor and subcontractors.

5. Attend pr e-construction meetings to discuss prevailing wage requirements with contractor and subcontractors.

6. Review Contractor's compliance with all State required postings such as the prevailing wage rates and EEO policies as well as the Contractor's Affirmative Action Plan.

7. Verify that certified payroll records are submitted by prime contractors and their subcontractors

8. Conduct Employee Field Interviews to confirm worker classification and wage rate of the project workforce conforms to the applicable contract provisions.

9. Reconcile Weekly Certified Payroll Reports (CPR) & supporting documentation with wage decision and employee field interviews. Perform continuous and timely monitoring reviews of CPRs and related submissions for compliance.

10. Review and verify Fringe Benefit Statements are consistent with the contract provisions and State of California requirements.

11. Monitor the submittal of Training Fund Contribution Reports.

12. Monitor workforce utilization reports to verify trade and apprenticeship participation.

13. Identify violations and investigate complaints of underpayment to workers.

14. Notify
BFS Landscape Architects regarding delinquent, uncertified, inaccurate and improperly completed payroll records and recommend appropriate corrective action for lack of strict compliance.

Wage Underpayment and Restitution Activities

1. Identify wage underpayment through audits of payroll documents, during onsite employee interviews or by complaints filed by workers on the project.

2. Calculate and recommend to
BFS Landscape Architects the amount of wages that will be withheld from the contractor's payments/retention.

CLOSTER PARK
Project Description and Approach
Labor compliance monitoring

3. Prepare documentation that list the week endings worked, the name of the worker, trade classification, number of hours worked, rate paid, correct prevailing wage rate and the amount due each worker. Prepare and submit docume ntation to BFS Landscape Architects.

4. Document and file final resolutions

Cost Proposal CLOSTER PARK
Labor compliance monitoring
360PSM
Compensation
We have reviewed the contract documents and have developed an estimated the following fee for labor compliance and monitoring prevailing wages. This estimate is based on an average construction project, however, there are factors beyond our control such as the performance of the contractor to complete the work on time and the number of underpayment violations. If project services are needed beyond the duration, the fee would be extended at the following hourly rate.

The estimated base bid cost of this construction work is $6,800,000

Labor Compliance – Pre-Construction Phase
Description Hours Rate Total
Labor Compliance
Monitoring Officer-
Analyst

8 $125/Hour $1000
Field Interviews 4 $125/Hour $500
Total $1,591.32

Conclusion
We look forward working with you on this important project. Please contact Catalina Ferreto at (831)500-1263 or email [email protected]

Sincerely,

Catalina Ferreto |360PSM
President
(831)500-1263
www.360psm.com
Labor Compliance - Construction Phase
Description Hours Rate Total
Labor Compliance Monitoring
Officer- Analyst

144 $132.61/hour

$19, 095.84

Field Interviews 72 $132.61/hour $9,547.92

Total $28,643.76

360PSM Fee Schedule/ Public outreach- Community outreach

Fee Schedule

Blueprint fees, copy fees, subconsultants or other direct costs not listed above are reimbursed at cost plus 10% Hourly Rates are effective as of Jan 1, 2022. Each subsequent year in January rate adjusted for inflation of 3%.

Catalina Ferreto
President 360PSM
831-500-1263
[email protected]

Labor Compliance
Hourly Rate $
2022 2023 2024
Labor Compliance 125 128.75 132.61
Field Interviews 125 128.75 132.61
President 150 154.5 159.14

Public outreach- Community outreach
Public outreach-
Community
outreach
125 128.75 132.61

U n i v e r s a l P l a y g r o u n d s C o n c e p t D e v e l o p m e n t . d o c x

1.0 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

1.01 Attend project start up meeting. Review scope of services, community engagement process, schedule, and anticipated construction budget with Owner and Project Manager [PM].

Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of start up meeting, BFS to submit project schedule

1.02 Visit Northgate Park and Williams Ranch Park with Owner and PM. Review and discuss existing site conditions and photograph for in-house design reference.

Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary of site visit and provide recommendations for anticipated site improvements.

1.03 Surveying consultant to prepare and submit site topographic survey for both parks Survey include aerial mapping and limited site survey information as determined by the park sites’ limit of work. BFS to prepare composite base plan for Design Team use.

Deliverable: Submit site topographic survey information (in AutoCAD base format) to Owner for future use.

1.04 Arborist consultant to prepare and submit arborist review and recommendations for Williams Ranch Park.

Deliverable: Submit arborist report and recommendation to Owner for future use.

1.05 Coordinate and discuss site storm water management strategies with PM and Civil Engineer. It is anticipated that both park sites will require site accessibility improvements and addition of impervious surfaces to the sites will required storm water management.

Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of storm water strategy discussion

1.06 Community meeting #1 (Northgate Park): Meet with Owner and PM to review agenda and goals of first community. BFS to prepare visual image boards and conduct multiple ‘dot surveys’ to gather the community’s preferences on playground themes, playground equipment and supporting site amenities. BFS to prepare a digital survey material through Google Forms. Online surveys to be made available through City website and Scope of Services
Universal Playgrounds at Northgate and Williams Ranch Parks November 04, 2022
PROJECT DESCRIPTION.

The City has allocated funding to install (2) universal playgrounds, (1) at Northgate Park and (1) at Williams Ranch Park. The universal playgrounds are to be thematic in nature and include supplemental amenities such as site furnishings, shade canopies and accessible pathway improvements. Provided in the scope below is support of City staff to facilitate and conduct community engagement, the preparation of construction documents and support of the City during the Construction period. Also included with this scope and fee is the proposal and fees for G7ei and 360 PSM to conduct City project management, budget management, construction management and Labor Compliance
Attached to this scope and fee is a memo prepared by BFS and shared with City staff; This memo provides an estimate of probable construction costs at a planning level. The scope and fee prepared below reflect an estimated construction cost of $868,840 for both playgrounds together. This cost reflects new play equipment, site furnishings, amenities, accessibility improvements and a combination of both poured-in-place resilient surfacing and engineered wood fiber resilient surfacing.

B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 2 o f 6 social media sites.

Deliverables: BFS to prepare community meeting materials (both in-person and online materials) and submit to Owner and PM for review.

1.07 Community meeting #2 (Williams Ranch Park): Meet with Owner and PM to review agenda and goals of first community. BFS to prepare visual image boards and conduct multiple ‘dot surveys’ to gather the community’s preferences on playground themes, playground equipment and supporting site amenities. BFS to prepare a digital survey material through Google Forms. Online surveys to be made available through City website and social media sites.

Deliverables: BFS to prepare community meeting materials (both in-person and online materials) and submit to Owner and PM for review.

1.08 Community outreach review meeting. Review with Owner and PM responses received from community outreach meetings. Review and discuss BFS recommendations for developing concept alternatives, including potential themes, playground equipment selections, supporting site amenities and construction budget estimates.

Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of community outreach review meeting

1.09 Develop no more than (3) draft conceptual design sketches (for each park) including playground theme, playground equipment, accessibility improvements and site supporting amenities. Sketches to be hand drawn and overlaid on scaled site base. Sketches to be supported with imagery and product materials.

Prepare estimate of probable construction costs. Submit for Owner and PM review.

Deliverable: BFS to prepare and submit conceptual design sketches, image boards and construction cost estimates

1.10 Review and refine final conceptual design sketches, image boards and cost estimates based on comments received from Owner and PM. BFS to prepare illustrative conceptual design sketches (for each park). BFS to coordinate with playground manufacturers to create 3D model renderings of each concept sketch. Submit for Owner and PM review.

Deliverable: BFS to prepare and submit final conceptual design sketches, image boards and construction cost estimates

2.0 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Scope and fee assumes biweekly coordination meetings with Owner and PM

2.01 BFS to complete a Design Manual to document research, products and cost of proposed design. Elements of the design manual to include:

A. Site Furnishings
B. Site Paving
C. Play Features
D. Shade Structures
Deliverable: Prepare and submit Design Manual to Owner / PM

2.02 Design Manual Review. Meeting with City via online web conferencing. Prepare meeting minutes for City and Design Team
Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of Design Manual review discussion

2.03 Design Development Coordination across the disciplines to prepare the 50% Design Development B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 3 o f 6 Documents
A. Civil Engineer to coordinate with the Design Team

1. Prepare stormwater management plan-coordinate with BFS on capturing site runoff and creating onsite treatment areas to meet local codes

2.04 Design Team to prepare and submit 50% Design Development Drawings. Submittal to include Cost Estimate. Drawings package to include
A. Cover Sheet
B. Existing Conditions Plan
C. Demolition Plan
D. Construction Plan
E. Grading and Drainage Plan
F. Construction Details
G. Irrigation Plan
H. Planting Plan
I. Irrigation and Planting Details
J. Stormwater Management Plan
Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 50% DD plans, construction cost estimate and product notebook

2.05 BFS to provide internal review of Design Development documents. Review Design Team documents for design consistency and coordinate conflicts with Design Team members as appropriate.

2.06 Meet with Owner and PM to review 50% Design Development Package and Cost Estimate.

Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of 50% DD review discussion

2.07 Based on 50% Design Development review comments, prepare 100% Design Development plans. Update cost estimate of construction budget.

Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 100% DD plans and construction cost estimate

2.08 BFS to provide internal review of Design Development documents. Review Design Team documents for design consistency and coordinate conflicts with Design Team members as appropriate.

2.09 Meet with Owner and PM to review 100% Design Development Package and Cost Estimate. Deliverable:

Prepare meeting minutes for City and Design Team
Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of 100% DD review discussion

3.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS & PERMITTING
Scope and fee assumes biweekly coordination meetings with Owner and PM

3.01 Based on approved Design Development drawings, prepare and submit electronically 75% complete Construction Drawings (CDs), submittal includes technical specifications and estimate of probable construction costs.

Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 75% CD plans, construction cost estimate and specifications.

3.02 BFS to provide internal review of Construction Documents. Review Design Team documents for design consistency and coordinate conflicts with Design Team members as appropriate.

B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 4 o f 6

3.03 Meet with Owner and PM to review 75% Construction Document Package and Cost Estimate. Deliverable:

Prepare meeting minutes for City and Design Team
Deliverable: BFS to prepare summary and meeting minutes of 75% DD review discussion

3.04 Based upon Owner / PM review, complete 90% CDs / Permit Set. Prepare estimate of probable construction costs and technical specifications in CSI format. Prepare building permit application and compile all required reports and information. Submit electronically and review with Owner / PM. Coordinate with building permit application with PM
Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 90% CD plans, construction cost estimate and specifications.

3.05 Compile and distribute agency plan-check comments for Owner / PM and sub-consultant review.

3.06 Based on plan-check comments, complete 100% CDs / Bid-set drawings, Technical Specifications, and Bid- Form.

A. Owner / PM will distribute copies of bid-documents.

B. Arrange for printing and distribution of copies of bid-documents if required by the Owner / PM as an additional reimbursable cost.

Deliverable: Design Team to prepare and submit 100% CD plans, construction cost estimate and specifications for bidding.

4.0 BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION

4.01 Attend pre-bid meeting with Owner / CM and potential bidders to discuss bidding procedures.

A. Prepare meeting minutes for the Owner / CM

4.02 Provide technical assistance during the bid process, including preparation of Addenda. Respond to questions as directed by Owner / CM. Provide written or graphic clarification as appropriate.

A. Assist Owner / CM in evaluating bids received.

4.03 Prepare and attend Bid Award Salinas City Council Meeting 03. See above task for approach.

Deliverables:

A. BFS to prepare presentation materials and submit to Owner and PM for review. BFS to prepare community noticing materials.

B. BFS to assist in presentation at City Council Meeting

4.04 Provide the Contractor a Conform Set of Drawings incorporating all addenda revisions.

4.05 Attend pre-construction meeting with Owner / CM and Contractor to discuss construction procedures.

A. Prepare meeting minutes for the Owner / CM

4.06 Respond to Requests for Information (RFI); furnish Clarifications, Revisions, and Architects Supplementary Instructions (ASI) to the Owner / CM; any change orders will be prepared by Owner / CM.

4.07 Review and process submittals, samples and Shop Drawings. Review proposed substitutions if any, for conformance to drawings and technical specifications.

B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 5 o f 6

4.08 Review and comment on Contractors Pay Applications and Proposed Change Orders.

4.09 Attend [12] bi-weekly project (OAC) meetings and on-site construction reviews followed by written field reports and/or meeting minutes. Assumes [6]-months construction and [1]-month landscape maintenance.

Reviews to include:

A. Substantial Completion Review – at start of landscape maintenance B. Punch-list Check – during landscape maintenance
C. Final Review – at end of landscape maintenance

4.10 Prepare Record Drawings based on As-Built drawings provided by the Contractor.

4.11 Close-out project including administrative documentation.

10.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Any additional presentations, drawings or documents not identified in the Scope of Services will be considered additional services. Additional services are provided only as authorized and on an hourly basis unless otherwise approved.

10.01 Additional community meetings as authorized by the Owner / PM.

10.02 Additional coordination meetings as authorized by the Owner / PM.

EXCLUSIONS
The following are excluded from our scope of services.

1. Printing and distribution of flyers / agenda / handouts for Community meetings.

2. Translation services for Community meetings.

3. CEQA document preparation and approvals.

4. Geotechnical Survey / Report.

5. Architectural Drawings for ancillary support buildings and structures.

6. Lighting Design (photometrics) and related Electrical Engineering,

7. ADAAG (Accessible route) / Signage Plan. Assumed to be in architectural scope.

8. Signage & graphics artwork.

9. LEED / CALGREEN rating-based project development and documentation.

10. Off-site improvements, except for utility connections.

11. Division 1 (General Conditions and Special Provisions) Project Specifications.

12. Printing of drawings on Mylar.
-END -
B F S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S N o v e m b e r 0 4 , 2 0 2 2 | P a g e 6 o f 6

COMPENSATION

1.0 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN .................................................................................................................$49,145 BFS (PRIME).........................................................................................................................................................................................$25,465 SANDIS (CIVIL & SURVEY) ...........................................................................................................................................................$18,555 ONO CONSULTING (ARBORIST) ................................................................................................................................................$3,125 LUPITA JAIME (TRANSLATION) ..................................................................................................................................................$2,000

2.0 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT ..............................................................................................................$28,550 BFS (PRIME).........................................................................................................................................................................................$17,480 SANDIS (CIVIL & SURVEY) ...........................................................................................................................................................$11,070

3.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS & PERMITTING ...................................................................$38,815 BFS (PRIME).........................................................................................................................................................................................$22,960 SANDIS (CIVIL & SURVEY) ...........................................................................................................................................................$15,855

4.0 BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION .................................................................$34,195 BFS (PRIME).........................................................................................................................................................................................$28,230 SANDIS (CIVIL & SURVEY) ..............................................................................................................................................................$5,965

5.0 PROJECTMANAGEMENT................................................................................................................$7,232 G7ei Inc Scope and Fee

6.0 BUDGET MANAGEMENT................................................................................................................$3,332 G7ei Inc Scope and Fee

7.0 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT..............................................................................................$28,052 G7ei Inc Scope and Fee

8.0 LABOR COMPLIANCE: PRECONSTRUCTION............................................................................$1,500 360 PSM Scope and Fee

9.0 LABOR COMPLIANCE: CONSTRUCTION ...................................................................................$8,125 360 PSM Scope and Fee

10.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES

10.01 Additional Community Meetings.............................................................................................$10,000/ea ` 10.02 Additional Coordination Meetings ................................................................................................$400/ea REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES BUDGET ...................................................................................................................................$5,000 TOTAL (NIC ADDITIONAL SERVICES) .....................................................................................$203,946 HOURLY RATES AND REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES: See current Standard Schedule of Compensation. All costs for printing, special delivery, horticultural soils analysis, Owner business licenses and fees, consultant services, and other costs directly related to the project would be billed as a reimbursable expense at our cost plus a fifteen percent administration charge.

Attachments: Standard Schedule of Compensation, dated 5/2022.

Notice: Landscape Architects are regulated by the State of California. Any questions concerning a Landscape Architect may be referred to the Landscape Architects Technical Committee at: Landscape Architects Technical Committee, 2420 Del Paso Rd, Unit 105, Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 575-7230.
1580 West El Camino Real, Suite 12, Mountain View 94040 Q (650) 326-6622 P Q (650) 963-9421 F 425 Paciﬁc Street, Suite 201, Monterey, California 93940 Q (831) 646-1383 P Q (831) 373-8653 F BFS Landscape Architects Q bfsla.com
landscape
architects

Standard Schedule of Compensation
May 2022

Universal Playgrounds at Northgate and Williams Ranch Parks

Page 1 of 1 ends

Salinas City CouncilDecember 13, 2022

Salinas City Council
December 13, 2022