Cities Index.
Agenda Packet

Salinas City Council
March 21, 2023

Document
Agenda Packet
Meeting
March 21, 2023
Body
Salinas City Council
Pages
6
Original file
23.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on salinas.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

Tuesday, March 21, 2023
4:00 PM
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas, CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org

SALINAS ROTUNDA
City Council
Mayor Kimbley Craig
Councilmembers:

Carla Viviana González, District 1 - Tony Barrera, District 2 Steve McShane, District 3 - Orlando Osornio, District 4 Andrew Sandoval, District 5 - Anthony Rocha, District 6 Steven S. Carrigan, City Manager
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
City Clerk’s Office: (831) 758-7381
Meeting Agenda - Final

March 21, 2023City Council Meeting Agenda - Final

ZOOM WEBINAR PARTICIPATION
JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89566993587
To participate telephonically, call any number below:

US: +1 669 900 9128 or +1 669 444 9171 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 719 359 4580 or +1 253 205 0468 or +1 507 473 4847 or +1 564 217 2000 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 646 931 3860 or +1 689 278 1000 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 305 224 1968 or +1 309 205 3325 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 360 209 5623 or +1 386 347 5053 Webinar ID: 895 6699 3587
If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

PROCLAMATION
National Social Work Month, March 2023

CITY OF CHAMPIONS
Maria Carmen Parra, District 1 Resident

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Receive public communications on items that are not on the agenda and that are in the City of Salinas’ subject matter jurisdiction. Comments on Consent, Consideration, and Closed session items should be held until the items are reached. The public may request that the legislative body consider adding an item for consideration on a future agenda. The public may comment on scheduled agenda items, including closed session items, as they are considered.

PUBLIC COMMENT PROCEDURES
If you wish to make a general public comment or comment on a specific agenda item, you are encouraged to attend the City Council meeting in person. Public comment may also be submitted via email at [email protected] and will be entered into the record.

PUBLIC COMMENT TIME RESTRICTIONS
Public comments generally are limited to two minutes per speaker; the Mayor may further limit the time for public comments depending on the agenda schedule.

Page 2 ends

March 21, 2023City Council Meeting Agenda - Final

CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under Consent Agenda may be enacted by one motion unless a member of the Council or the public requests discussion or a separate vote.

ID#23-210 Minutes
Recommendation: Approve minutes of March 7, 2023.

ID#23-204 Financial Claims
Recommendation: Approve financial claims report.

ID#23-085 Alisal Safe Routes to School Project (Exempt from CEQA: CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1(c))
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution approving the Plans and Specifications for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project; categorically exempting the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project; authorizing the Public Works Director to execute all agreements and any required paperwork with Caltrans for the Active Transportation Grant Program; and authorizing the establishment of a new CIP Account "Alisal Safe Routes to School Project" with the establishment of Special Const Assist - Fed & St Fund appropriation totaling $998,000 and corresponding revenue budget for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project with no matching funds required.

ID#23-104 California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank Application for Financing the Industrial Wastewater Treatment System Improvements Project
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the submission of an application to the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank for financing the Industrial Wastewater Treatment System Improvements Project and declaration of official intent to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of an obligation.

ID#23-160 Central Park Tennis Courts Wall Replacement and Resurfacing and Claremont Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing; CIP No. 9022
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution accepting the Central Park Tennis Courts Wall Replacement and Resurfacing and Claremont Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing; CIP No. 9022, for maintenance and responsibility.

ID#23-175 Emergency Motel Program Room Rental Agreements Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Room Rental Agreement with JS Inc. for the purpose of providing emergency housing to unhoused City residents in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000; and to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 22MoCoARPA03 with Marina Hotels Ci, LLC to add an additional $115,000 of City Encampment Resolution Funds (ERF) and $135,000 of City American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for a total amount not to exceed $907,000.

ID#23-181 California Energy Commission Acceptance and Appropriation of Funding Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any agreement or related documents necessary to accept up to $80,000 from the California Energy Commission for the California Automated Permit Processing Program (CalAPP); and authorizing an appropriation of up to $80,000 in funding to the Community Development Department, Permit Services Division to fund said program.

Page 3 ends

March 21, 2023City Council Meeting Agenda - Final
ID#23-194 COVID-19 Pandemic - Termination of Local Emergency Recommendation: Approve a Resolution terminating the local emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

ID#23-208 Assembly Bill 652 -Department of Pesticide Regulation Environmental Justice Committee
Recommendation: Consider approving a Resolution authorizing the submittal of a letter from the City Council in support of Assembly Bill 652, to establish an Environmental Justice Committee at the Department of Pesticide Regulation.

CONSIDERATION
ID#23-183 The Salinas Plan Refresh Report
Recommendation: Receive and accept report regarding the Salinas Plan Update.

ID#23-157 Annual Public Art Plan
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution accepting the annual public art plan and authorizing use and appropriation of up to $8,000 from the Municipal Art Fund to fund the proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Annual Public Arts Plan.

ID#23-093 Request for Blue Zone at 1224 Hawaii Place
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution denying the request for one (1) blue accessible zone designation at 1224 Hawaii Place.

CLOSED SESSION
Receive public communications from the audience on Closed session items.

The City Council will recess to closed session pursuant to:

ID#23-203 a. Existing Litigation - California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding, Betty Wilder v. City of Salinas, Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 22CV000763
b. Existing Litigation - California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding, Jesse Gilpas v. City of Salinas, Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 22CV001407
c. Pending Litigation - California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding, Santa Rita Union High School District, et al. v. City of Salinas et al., Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 20CV000242.
d. Pending Litigation - California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding, Alisal Union School District, et al. v. City of Salinas, et al., Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 20CV00340. e. Real Property Negotiations - California Government Code Section 54956.8, conference with real property negotiators City Manager Steven S. Carrigan, City Attorney Christopher A. Callihan, Community Development Director Megan Hunter, and Assistant Community Development Director Lisa Brinton, to discuss

Page 4 ends

March 21, 2023City Council Meeting Agenda - Final
the terms and sale of real properties located at 219 Salinas Street (APN 002242029000, Parking Lot 1); 210 Salinas Street (APN TNPAPN 000142, Parking Lot 8); 122 Lincoln Avenue (APN 002245008000, Parking Lot 12), 128 Lincoln Avenue (APN 002245007000, Parking Lot 12), 118 Lincoln Avenue (APN 002245005000, Parking Lot 12), 120 Lincoln Avenue (APN 0022458006000, Parking Lot 12), 112 Lincoln Avenue (APN 002245004000, Parking Lot 12).

CONSIDERATION
ID#23-151 2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report and Visión Salinas 2040 Update Recommendation: Approve a Resolution accepting the 2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report (GP APR) and authorizing its submittal to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR).

ID#23-167 2022 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution approving the City of Salinas 2022 Housing Element (HE) Annual Progress Report (APR) and authorizing its submittal to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) as required by Government Code Section 65400(b).

ID#23-131 Execution of an American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Grant Funding Agreement with Eden Housing, Inc. for a Proposed 100% Affordable Multifamily Rental Housing Project at 855 East Laurel Drive Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing a one-time deviation from the City of Salinas Zoning Code to allow the County of Monterey to process entitlements for the Eden Housing, Inc. 100% affordable multifamily housing project at 855 E. Laurel Drive in coordination with the City; and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute an ARPA Grant Agreement with Eden Housing, Inc. in the amount of $500,000 for pre-development costs; and authorize the Community Development Director or Housing Division Planning Manager to approve any future revisions, amendments and/or modifications to the ARPA Grant Funding Agreement provided compliance with the terms and conditions of the ARPA Grant Funding Agreement.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
ID#23-165 United States Department of Housing and Urban Development HOME Investment Partnership Program American Rescue Plan Act Allocation Plan Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the submission of an updated HOME Investment Partnership Program American Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP) Allocation Plan (AP) to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute any required Agreements necessary to support the acceptance of funds and implementation; and authorize an increase of up to $2,772,835 to the HOME-ARP fund appropriation and corresponding revenue budget.

PRESENTATION
Councilmember comments on presentations are generally limited to three minutes.

Page 5 ends

March 21, 2023City Council Meeting Agenda - Final
ID#23-186 Fiscal Year 2024 Community Budget Survey
Recommendation: No action required. This report presents information to the City Council regarding the FY 2024 Community Budget Survey results.

COUNCILMEMBERS’ REPORTS, APPOINTMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Receive communication from Councilmembers on reports, appointments and future agenda items. Councilmember comments are generally limited to three minutes.

ADJOURNMENT
_____________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

AGENDA MATERIAL / ADDENDUM
Any addendums will be posted within 72 hours of regular meetings or 24 hours of special meetings and in accordance with Californian Government Code Section 54954.2 and 54956. City Council agenda reports and other writings distributed to the legislative body may be viewed at the Salinas City Clerk’s Office, 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, and are posted on the City’s website at www.cityofsalinas.org in accordance with California Government Code section 54597.5. The City Council may take action that is different than the proposed action reflected on the agenda.

Disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, may be requested by any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting. Language interpretation may be requested as soon as possible but by no later than 5 p.m. of the last business day prior to the meeting. Requests should be referred to the City Clerk’s Office At 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, 758-7381, as soon as possible but by no later than 5 p.m. of the last business day prior to the meeting. Hearing impaired or TTY/TDD text telephone users may contact the city by dialing 711 for the California Relay Service (CRS) or by telephoning any other service providers’ CRS telephone number.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
This agenda was posted on March 17, 2023 at the City Clerk’s Office, in the Council Rotunda, and the City's website.

Meetings are streamed live at https://salinas.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx and televised live on Channel 25 at 4 p.m. on the date of the regularly scheduled meeting and will be broadcast throughout the day on the Wednesday, Friday, Saturday and Monday following the meeting. For the most up-to-the-minute Broadcast Schedule for The Salinas Channel on Comcast 25, please visit or subscribe to our Google Calendar located at http://tinyurl.com/salinas25. Recent City Council meetings may also be viewed on the Salinas Channel on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/thesalinaschannel.

Page 6 ends

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-210, Version: 1
Minutes
Approve minutes of March 7, 2023.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-204, Version: 1
Financial Claims
Approve financial claims report.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
464990 03/02/2023 Open MV Cheng & Associates Inc. $9,810.00 464991 03/07/2023 Open 2NDNATURE, LLC $96,971.21
464992 03/07/2023 Open 4 Imprint $10,501.59
464993 03/07/2023 Open 72 Hour LLC dba Chevrolet of Watsonville/National $1,057.95 464994 03/07/2023 Open Ace Hardware $71.00
464995 03/07/2023 Open Alco Water $4,502.11
464996 03/07/2023 Open Alhambra and Sierra Spring DS Waters of America LP $166.89 464997 03/07/2023 Open All Pets Hospital $429.21
464998 03/07/2023 Open Amazon.Com $2,846.51
464999 03/07/2023 Open American Association of Code Enforcement $75.00 465000 03/07/2023 Open American Supply Company $2,556.62 465001 03/07/2023 Open Andrew McLaughlin $100.00
465002 03/07/2023 Open Applied Maintenance Supplies & Solutions LLC $1,592.53 465003 03/07/2023 Open Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Group, Inc $634.62 465004 03/07/2023 Open Asap Alisal Signs And Printing $1,043.26 465005 03/07/2023 Open Avolve Software Corp $16,299.00
465006 03/07/2023 Open Benitez Security Services, Inc $80,727.00 465007 03/07/2023 Open Big Sur Land Trust $1,000,000.00 465008 03/07/2023 Open Breakout Prison Outreach dba California Youth Outr $16,181.83 465009 03/07/2023 Open Brent DeBorde $266.25
465010 03/07/2023 Open Bruce Bush $100.00
465011 03/07/2023 Open California Towing and Transport $9,354.80 465012 03/07/2023 Open California Water Service $991.40 465013 03/07/2023 Open Carollo Engineers, Inc $205,101.19 465014 03/07/2023 Open Cassie McSorley $100.00
465015 03/07/2023 Open CDW-G $1,733.15
465016 03/07/2023 Open Central Coast Center For Independent $2,329.70 465017 03/07/2023 Open Chris Swinscoe $100.00
465018 03/07/2023 Open Cintas $1,433.81
465019 03/07/2023 Open Coast Automotive Warehouse Inc $816.93 465020 03/07/2023 Open Comcast (Business) $54.11
465021 03/07/2023 Open Community Homeless Solutions $34,981.31 465022 03/07/2023 Open CONCERN $5,432.88
465023 03/07/2023 Open Condor Security Of America Inc $8,404.20 465024 03/07/2023 Open CPS HR Consulting $434.50
465025 03/07/2023 Open CSC Of Salinas $26.31
465026 03/07/2023 Open Dana Cornelison $100.00
465027 03/07/2023 Open Daniel David Green $100.00
465028 03/07/2023 Open Dave Shaw $100.00
465029 03/07/2023 Open David L Crabill $100.00
465030 03/07/2023 Open David Poulin $100.00
465031 03/07/2023 Open David Werner $539.67
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 3/2/2023 - To Payment Date: 3/14/2023 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 1 of 8 Tuesday, March 14, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 3/2/2023 - To Payment Date: 3/14/2023 465032 03/07/2023 Open Department Of Justice $1,464.00
465033 03/07/2023 Open Don Chapin Inc $18,103.92
465034 03/07/2023 Open Dudek $36,203.92
465035 03/07/2023 Open East Bay Tire Company $4,881.86
465036 03/07/2023 Open EBSCO Industries, Inc dba EBSCO, EBSCO Information $4,815.68 465037 03/07/2023 Open Emergency Response Training Inc dba Defibthis Emer $115.00 465038 03/07/2023 Open Evident $775.22
465039 03/07/2023 Open Fastenal Company $3,918.43
465040 03/07/2023 Open Fed Ex $45.99
465041 03/07/2023 Open Ferguson US Hodings, Inc dba Ferguson Enterprises $1,142.43 465042 03/07/2023 Open First Alarm Security & Patrol Inc dba An Allied Un $5,939.25 465043 03/07/2023 Open Gabriel Hernandez $100.00
465044 03/07/2023 Open Gold Star Motors dba Gold Star Buick GMC $305.07 465045 03/07/2023 Open Golden State Emergency Vehicle Service Inc $76.70 465046 03/07/2023 Open Golden State Truck and Trailer Repair $12,489.57 465047 03/07/2023 Open Granite Construction Company $1,714.09 465048 03/07/2023 Open Granite Rock Co $1,670.78
465049 03/07/2023 Open Green Rubber Kennedy Ag $94.36
465050 03/07/2023 Open Harris and Associates $9,960.00
465051 03/07/2023 Open Hartnell College $177,000.00
465052 03/07/2023 Open Heath Johnson $100.00
465053 03/07/2023 Open Henry Gomez $100.00
465054 03/07/2023 Open Home Depot Credit Services $93.78 465055 03/07/2023 Open Hydro Turf $187.94
465056 03/07/2023 Open Ingram Book Company $8,124.41
465057 03/07/2023 Open Interstate Battery System Inc $116.01 465058 03/07/2023 Open Iteris Inc $51,631.55
465059 03/07/2023 Open Jacqueline Pacelli $100.00
465060 03/07/2023 Open James Knowlton $100.00
465061 03/07/2023 Open Jayson F. Cardinalli dba Clean Brothers $11,718.00 465062 03/07/2023 Open Jeff Gibson $100.00
465063 03/07/2023 Open Jesse Pinon $100.00
465064 03/07/2023 Open Jimmy Vanhove dba Precision K9 $4,600.00 465065 03/07/2023 Open Johnson Associates $779.28
465066 03/07/2023 Open Johnson Electronics $342.00
465067 03/07/2023 Open Jonathan Barnes $100.00
465068 03/07/2023 Open Jose Adrian Garcia Ramos dba Shredding Source Solu $315.00 465069 03/07/2023 Open Kelly-Moore Paint Company $604.51 465070 03/07/2023 Open Kevin Skinner $100.00
465071 03/07/2023 Open Kimley Horn And Assoc Inc $1,967.50 465072 03/07/2023 Open Kronos Incorporated $160.00
465073 03/07/2023 Open Kyle Umidon dba Northern California's Emergency $11,014.76 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 2 of 8 Tuesday, March 14, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 3/2/2023 - To Payment Date: 3/14/2023 465074 03/07/2023 Open L.N. Curtis & Sons $1,518.57
465075 03/07/2023 Open Lance Miraco $100.00
465076 03/07/2023 Open League Of California Cities $37,603.00 465077 03/07/2023 Open LexisNexis Risk Data Management Inc Accurint Acct $243.85 465078 03/07/2023 Open Liebert Cassidy Whitmore $1,701.50 465079 03/07/2023 Open Mark Freedman $100.00
465080 03/07/2023 Open Martin Persijn $100.00
465081 03/07/2023 Open Martin Sandoval dba Lock Stock N' Barrel $877.24 465082 03/07/2023 Open McLaughlin Painting $25,000.00
465083 03/07/2023 Open Michael Groves $100.00
465084 03/07/2023 Open Michael Spencer dba Tire & Wheel World $154.53 465085 03/07/2023 Open Michele Lea Vaughn $4,446.00
465086 03/07/2023 Open MissionSquare Retirement $20,000.00 465087 03/07/2023 Open MJ Communications, Inc $392.00
465088 03/07/2023 Open MNS Engineers, Inc $1,462.50
465089 03/07/2023 Open Monterey Transfer and Storage Inc $512.50 465090 03/07/2023 Open Moore Wallace dba RR Donnelley $1,662.22 465091 03/07/2023 Open MP 21 Soledad Street, L.P. $3,795.00 465092 03/07/2023 Open MP 21 Soledad Street, L.P. $1,382.00 465093 03/07/2023 Open Municipal Maintenance Equipment dba MME $3,396.11 465094 03/07/2023 Open New Image Landscape Company $250.00 465095 03/07/2023 Open Nomar Enterprises LLC dba Rugged Depot $4,190.61 465096 03/07/2023 Open O'Reilly Auto Parts $136.07
465097 03/07/2023 Open One Workplace L Ferrari, LLC dba Peninsula Busines $28,393.28 465098 03/07/2023 Open Operation Freedom Paws $714.00
465099 03/07/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $2,553.60 465100 03/07/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $15,163.09 465101 03/07/2023 Open Pacific Truck Parts Inc $158.96
465102 03/07/2023 Open Patania Masonry $19,375.00
465103 03/07/2023 Open Pedro C Estrada Dba Estrada Janitorial Service $61,415.00 465104 03/07/2023 Open Philip Gagnon $415.00
465105 03/07/2023 Open PLM Lender Services Inc $667.50
465106 03/07/2023 Open Pure Water $7.75
465107 03/07/2023 Open Quality Water Enterprises $239.00 465108 03/07/2023 Open Rancho Cielo Youth Center $14,537.16 465109 03/07/2023 Open RDO Equipment Company $480.00
465110 03/07/2023 Open Regional Government Services $1,034.09 465111 03/07/2023 Open Rent-A-Fence.com, Inc $108.16
465112 03/07/2023 Open Republic Services of Salinas $1,604.16 465113 03/07/2023 Open Rexel USA, Inc dba Platt Electric Supply $269.37 465114 03/07/2023 Open Richard Maldonado $100.00
465115 03/07/2023 Open Ricky Williams $100.00
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 3 of 8 Tuesday, March 14, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 3/2/2023 - To Payment Date: 3/14/2023 465116 03/07/2023 Open Rincon Consultants, Inc. $2,585.25 465117 03/07/2023 Open Salinas Toyota $195.96
465118 03/07/2023 Open Same Day Shred $32.50
465119 03/07/2023 Open San Lorenzo Lumber $1,234.08
465120 03/07/2023 Open Scott Myhre $100.00
465121 03/07/2023 Open Scott Tyler $100.00
465122 03/07/2023 Open SettlementOne Screening Corporation dba PeopleFact $39.15 465123 03/07/2023 Open Sheldon Bryan $100.00
465124 03/07/2023 Open Silver and Wright LLP $6,108.65
465125 03/07/2023 Open Simon Jimenez $100.00
465126 03/07/2023 Open Simplot AB Retail Sub Inc $5,000.00 465127 03/07/2023 Open Smart and Final Iris $787.81
465128 03/07/2023 Open Smith and Enright Landscaping $155,116.71 465129 03/07/2023 Open South Bay Regional Public Safety $8,740.00 465130 03/07/2023 Open Stanley Cooper $100.00
465131 03/07/2023 Open Stommel Inc dba Lehr $59.94
465132 03/07/2023 Open Sunlite Auto Glass, Inc $220.18
465133 03/07/2023 Open Suthided Livingston $100.00
465134 03/07/2023 Open Suzanne Cottle-Gavalla $100.00
465135 03/07/2023 Open Sylvia Enriquez $276.91
465136 03/07/2023 Open T-Mobile USA $39.65
465137 03/07/2023 Open Target Pest Control $385.00
465138 03/07/2023 Open Ted Koch $100.00
465139 03/07/2023 Open Tehama Golf Club LLC $800.00
465140 03/07/2023 Open Terry Gerhardstein $100.00
465141 03/07/2023 Open The Ed Jones Company, Incorporated $136.70 465142 03/07/2023 Open TOC Public Relations LLC $3,500.00 465143 03/07/2023 Open Todd Swinscoe $100.00
465144 03/07/2023 Open Traffic Logix, Corp. $89,182.96
465145 03/07/2023 Open Tri County Concrete and Supply, Inc $3,359.45 465146 03/07/2023 Open Tri County Fire Protection $472.04 465147 03/07/2023 Open U.S. Bank National Association ND $5,202.39 465148 03/07/2023 Open Underground Service Alert $1,825.83 465149 03/07/2023 Open United Parcel Service $32.67
465150 03/07/2023 Open Valley Fabrication Inc $1,533.74 465151 03/07/2023 Open Valley Saw Shop $95.58
465152 03/07/2023 Open Valley Trophies and Detectors $237.62 465153 03/07/2023 Open Vals Plumbing and Heating Inc $10,142.00 465154 03/07/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $3,516.30
465155 03/07/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $3,251.11
465156 03/07/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $1,001.23
465157 03/07/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $5,938.25
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 4 of 8 Tuesday, March 14, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 3/2/2023 - To Payment Date: 3/14/2023 465158 03/07/2023 Open W W Grainger Inc $5,125.08
465159 03/07/2023 Open Wallace Group A California Corporation $64,234.84 465160 03/07/2023 Open Walmart c/o Capitol One $161.97 465161 03/07/2023 Open WCAF, LLC dba Watsonville Ford $1,698.59 465162 03/07/2023 Open WCDJR LLC dba Watsonville Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram $281.17 465163 03/07/2023 Open Worldpac $200.31
465164 03/07/2023 Open Alejandro Limon $15.00
465165 03/07/2023 Open Christopher Knapp $15.00
465166 03/07/2023 Open Collin Mitchell $15.00
465167 03/07/2023 Open David Furey $15.00
465168 03/07/2023 Open Environmental Systems, Inc of Northern California $2,500.00 465169 03/07/2023 Open Hilda Peralta $120.25
465170 03/07/2023 Open Ichelle Herrera $150.00
465171 03/07/2023 Open James Goulart $120.00
465172 03/07/2023 Open Jesus Ramirez $15.00
465173 03/07/2023 Open Jonathan Moore $372.83
465174 03/07/2023 Open Kimbley Craig $1,183.68
465175 03/07/2023 Open League Of California Cities $40.00 465176 03/07/2023 Open Luis Ochoa $166.30
465177 03/07/2023 Open Marco Sotelo Saldana $141.00
465178 03/07/2023 Open Monica Gurmilan $372.83
465179 03/07/2023 Open Nathan Mitchell $15.00
465180 03/07/2023 Open Robert Marques $15.00
465181 03/07/2023 Open Ryan Macoubrie $15.00
465182 03/07/2023 Open Sean Schmidt $141.00
465183 03/07/2023 Open Regional Training Center $576.00 465184 03/14/2023 Open Acme Car Wash (William Pierce Inc) $1,229.00 465185 03/14/2023 Open Alco Water $21.49
465186 03/14/2023 Open Alco Water $7,251.78
465187 03/14/2023 Open All Pets Hospital $982.54
465188 03/14/2023 Open All Safe Security Alarm $250.00
465189 03/14/2023 Open American Traffic Solutions Inc. $15,940.98 465190 03/14/2023 Open Ana Rueda De Vidales dba JAV Language Solutions $210.61 465191 03/14/2023 Open Analgesic Services Inc $207.00
465192 03/14/2023 Open AP Triton, LLC $1,938.80
465193 03/14/2023 Open Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Group, Inc $634.62 465194 03/14/2023 Open B & H Foto & Electronics Corp $6,285.72 465195 03/14/2023 Open Blancas Construction, Inc. $1,990.00 465196 03/14/2023 Open C & S Engineers, Inc. $19,000.00 465197 03/14/2023 Open California Association For Property and Evidence $50.00 465198 03/14/2023 Open California Stormwater Quality Association $4,610.22 465199 03/14/2023 Open California Water Service $1,401.17 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 5 of 8 Tuesday, March 14, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 3/2/2023 - To Payment Date: 3/14/2023 465200 03/14/2023 Open Candido Martinez Dba Welders Fabrication and Desig $350.00 465201 03/14/2023 Open CDW-G $6,155.71
465202 03/14/2023 Open Central Coast Center For Independent $4,714.66 465203 03/14/2023 Open Central Coast YMCA $14,121.00
465204 03/14/2023 Open Cintas $1,365.43
465205 03/14/2023 Open CMP-1, Llc dba Boronda Manor $6,501.97 465206 03/14/2023 Open Comcast (Business) $259.79
465207 03/14/2023 Open Comcast (Business) $167.72
465208 03/14/2023 Open Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. $139.84 465209 03/14/2023 Open Credit Consulting Services $583.11 465210 03/14/2023 Open CSDIAI $55.00
465211 03/14/2023 Open Don Chapin Inc $85.00
465212 03/14/2023 Open Don Chapin Inc $71,964.76
465213 03/14/2023 Open East Bay Tire Company $1,174.77
465214 03/14/2023 Open Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity $8,637.54 465215 03/14/2023 Open Fastenal Company $252.72
465216 03/14/2023 Open First Alarm Security & Patrol Inc dba An Allied Un $1,518.65 465217 03/14/2023 Open First Alarm Wellness A Family Counseling Corporati $700.00 465218 03/14/2023 Open Garrett DeWitt $125.72
465219 03/14/2023 Open Golden State Emergency Vehicle Service Inc $3,802.19 465220 03/14/2023 Open Goldfarb and Lipman $4,041.50
465221 03/14/2023 Open Granite Construction Company $1,461.24 465222 03/14/2023 Open Granite Rock Co $9,947.74
465223 03/14/2023 Open Green Rubber Kennedy Ag $1,566.34 465224 03/14/2023 Open Green Valley Industrial Supply $54.19 465225 03/14/2023 Open Hydro Turf $1,576.27
465226 03/14/2023 Open Interactive Data, LLC dba IDI $143.00 465227 03/14/2023 Open Isaac Arias $1,250.00
465228 03/14/2023 Open Jan Roehl Dba Jan Roehl Consulting $1,900.00 465229 03/14/2023 Open Jimenez Autobody Parts, Inc dba C & J Auto Parts $335.35 465230 03/14/2023 Open Jose Daniel Barrera dba Signa Signs & Graphics $3,083.25 465231 03/14/2023 Open Jose Luis Corral dba Salinas Pizza $335.77 465232 03/14/2023 Open JT Hose & Fittings $200.71
465233 03/14/2023 Open Katharine G Bristol dba Kate Bristol Consulting $5,900.00 465234 03/14/2023 Open Kelly-Moore Paint Company $1,828.85 465235 03/14/2023 Open Kimley Horn And Assoc Inc $21,882.50 465236 03/14/2023 Open Kuker Ranken, Inc $16,219.56
465237 03/14/2023 Open Kysmet Security & Patrol $3,556.00 465238 03/14/2023 Open Las Casas de Madera Cooperative, Inc $1,335.00 465239 03/14/2023 Open Lisa Marie Vetter dba Tour de force Speakers $8,882.50 465240 03/14/2023 Open Marina Hotels CI LLC dba Country Inn & Suites $114,012.00 465241 03/14/2023 Open Marina Hotels CI LLC dba Country Inn & Suites $12,112.00 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 6 of 8 Tuesday, March 14, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 3/2/2023 - To Payment Date: 3/14/2023 465242 03/14/2023 Open Melanie Coffin $55.00
465243 03/14/2023 Open MGT Of America Inc $3,000.00
465244 03/14/2023 Open Microdesk Inc $1,060.00
465245 03/14/2023 Open MIS CORP $6,750.00
465246 03/14/2023 Open Monterey Bay Analytical Services, Inc $868.00 465247 03/14/2023 Open Monterey County Convention And Visitors Bureau $33,648.97 465248 03/14/2023 Open Monterey One Water $9,125.69
465249 03/14/2023 Open Monterey Transfer and Storage Inc $955.84 465250 03/14/2023 Open Monterra Ranch Of Monterey Home Owner's Associatio $900.00 465251 03/14/2023 Open MP 21 Soledad Street, L.P. $1,041.00 465252 03/14/2023 Open My Chevrolet $650.26
465253 03/14/2023 Open Office Depot Business Service Division $1,494.70 465254 03/14/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $3,382.81 465255 03/14/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $819.03 465256 03/14/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $739.85 465257 03/14/2023 Open Pacific Truck Parts Inc $593.68
465258 03/14/2023 Open Pedro C Estrada Dba Estrada Janitorial Service $150.00 465259 03/14/2023 Open Petsmart $323.84
465260 03/14/2023 Open PJ Trucking Academy LLC $16,650.00 465261 03/14/2023 Open Pryor Learning Solutions Inc dba Fred Pryor Semina $2,985.00 465262 03/14/2023 Open Pure Water $245.75
465263 03/14/2023 Open Quality Water Enterprises $194.49 465264 03/14/2023 Open Ray Vargas Inc. dba Advanced Towing $222.00 465265 03/14/2023 Open RELX Inc. dba LexisNexis, Division of RELX Inc. $982.25 465266 03/14/2023 Open Russell Auria Pest Control Services $345.00 465267 03/14/2023 Open Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority $6,499.89 465268 03/14/2023 Open Salinas Valley Tourism And Visitors Bureau $20,000.00 465269 03/14/2023 Open Same Day Shred $90.00
465270 03/14/2023 Open San Lorenzo Lumber $40.99
465271 03/14/2023 Open SCI Consulting Group $15,650.00
465272 03/14/2023 Open Sonoma State University $75.00
465273 03/14/2023 Open Southern California Veterinary Dental Specialties $2,907.86 465274 03/14/2023 Open SpeakWrite LLC $1,957.54
465275 03/14/2023 Open Special Services Group LLC $2,160.00 465276 03/14/2023 Open Stephanie Morales-Bravo Petty Cash Custodian $5.02 465277 03/14/2023 Open Stommel Inc dba Lehr $3,204.30
465278 03/14/2023 Open Sturdy Oil Company $55,229.08
465279 03/14/2023 Open SUBA $548.10
465280 03/14/2023 Open Sunstar Media $25.00
465281 03/14/2023 Open Symbol Arts $1,996.85
465282 03/14/2023 Open Target Pest Control $100.00
465283 03/14/2023 Open Tehama Golf Club LLC $800.00
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 7 of 8 Tuesday, March 14, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 3/2/2023 - To Payment Date: 3/14/2023 465284 03/14/2023 Open Tri County Fire Protection $720.00 465285 03/14/2023 Open U.S. Bank National Association ND $7,179.76 465286 03/14/2023 Open United Parcel Service $43.95
465287 03/14/2023 Open United Site Services $1,427.82
465288 03/14/2023 Open Valley Saw Shop $1,524.01
465289 03/14/2023 Open Vals Plumbing and Heating Inc $481.87 465290 03/14/2023 Open Veritiv Operating Company Formerly xpedx $2,980.22 465291 03/14/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $355.14
465292 03/14/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $759.28
465293 03/14/2023 Open VertiGIS North America Ltd. $9,557.00 465294 03/14/2023 Open Voyager $1,152.49
465295 03/14/2023 Open Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP $1,595.00 465296 03/14/2023 Open Wallace Group A California Corporation $297.50 465297 03/14/2023 Open WCDJR LLC dba Watsonville Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram $35.94 465298 03/14/2023 Open Worldpac $58.73
465299 03/14/2023 Open Adriana Robles $1,814.67
465300 03/14/2023 Open Alejandro Limon $228.00
465301 03/14/2023 Open Alexis Mejia $209.60
465302 03/14/2023 Open Andrew Easterling $2,000.00
465303 03/14/2023 Open Anthony Rocha $152.59
465304 03/14/2023 Open Cameron Murphy $242.50
465305 03/14/2023 Open Estefania Vargas $228.00
465306 03/14/2023 Open Gregory Hurst $150.00
465307 03/14/2023 Open Heidi Niggemeyer $1,288.04
465308 03/14/2023 Open James Arensdorf $242.50
465309 03/14/2023 Open Justin Heckman $190.00
465310 03/14/2023 Open Katherine Black $18.00
465311 03/14/2023 Open Kellie Mellow $242.50
465312 03/14/2023 Open Kim Picaso $358.75
465313 03/14/2023 Open Martina Byler $242.50
465314 03/14/2023 Open Mashaad Kiburi $380.70
465315 03/14/2023 Open Patricia Barajas $209.60
465316 03/14/2023 Open Rachel Safa $18.00
465317 03/14/2023 Open Randy Casey $39.90
465318 03/14/2023 Open Robert Asamoto $310.53
465319 03/14/2023 Open Thomas Melia $150.00
$3,169,413.04Type Check Totals:

General Account - General Account Totals
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 8 of 8 Tuesday, March 14, 2023 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-085, Version: 1
Alisal Safe Routes to School Project (Exempt from CEQA: CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1(c)) Approve a Resolution approving the Plans and Specifications for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project; categorically exempting the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project; authorizing the Public Works Director to execute all agreements and any required paperwork with Caltrans for the Active Transportation Grant Program; and authorizing the establishment of a new CIP Account “Alisal Safe Routes to School Project” with the establishment of Special Const Assist - Fed & St Fund appropriation totaling $998,000 and corresponding revenue budget for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project with no matching funds required.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: MARCH 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FROM: DAVID JACOBS P.E., L.S., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

ANDREW EASTERLING, TRAFFIC ENGINEER
TITLE: ALISAL SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT CATEGORICAL

EXEMPTION

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to:
1) Approve the Plans and Specifications for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project; 2) Approve the Categorical Exemption for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project; 3) Authorize the Public Works Director to execute all agreements and any required paperwork with Caltrans for the Active Transportation Grant Program; and 4) Authorize the establishment of a new CIP project, “Alisal Safe Routes to School Project,” with appropriations totaling $998,000, a transfer of $998,000 from the Special Const Assist – Fed & St Fund to the CIP Fund, and a corresponding revenue budget for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project with no matching funds required.

BACKGROUND:

On December 14, 2021, City Council approved Resolution 22267 (Attachment 1) to appropriate $750,000 of anticipated funding from the American Rescue Plan Act towards improving the marked midblock crosswalk on Williams Road, and to direct staff to proceed with implementation to fully effectuate the intent of the Resolution. On March 18, 2022, the City published a request for proposals to provide design services for the Williams Road Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Project.

Three firms submitted proposals and s taff ranked K imley Horn and Associates as the most qualified applicant. The City entered into an agreement with Kimley -Horn and Associates effective May23, 2022 to prepare construction documents for the pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) at Williams Road.

On June 15, 2022, the City in partnership with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) submitted an application to the Active Transportation Grant Program to request funding for improvements identified in the Salinas Safe Routes to Schools Plan (Attachment 2), including the PHB system on Williams R oad, plus funds to replace street trees and install radar feedback signage. In addition to funding for infrastructure improvements, the application included non - Page | 2
infrastructure funding for classroom b icycle/pedestrian education workshops, bike rodeos, and walk/bike to school encouragement days. The City was successful in its grant application and was selected to be awarded grant funds in the amount of $998,000. The project plans and specifications are now complete, and staff is recommending the approval of plans and specifications, and approval of the categorical exemption document.

Following the approval of the Plans and Specifications and the environmental document, staff may submit an allocation request to Caltrans for grant funds. Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Public Works Director to execute any necessary agreements and any required paperwork with Caltrans for the Active Transportation Grant Program. Staff also recommends that the City Council approve a Resolution to authorize the establishment of a new CIP Account “Alisal Safe Routes to School Project” appropriation totaling $998,000 and corresponding revenue budget for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project with no matching funds required. The item will be brought back to Council to approve a professional service agreement with TAMC for the non - infrastructure components and also to award the construction contract following the advertisement of the project.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The City of Salinas has determined that the project is categorical exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1(c)) because the actions consist of operation and minor alteration of an existing City street. A notice of exemption has been prepared and will be filed with the County Clerk’s office.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This item supports the City Council’s goal of “public safety”.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Public Works Department and Finance Department manage the project accounting. The Public Works Department manages construction contract, inspection, and final acceptance of construction projects.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There is no impact to the General Fund. The grant amount is $998,000 and the City is not responsible for any matching funds. Staff recommends the establishment of a new CIP account “Alisal Safe Routes to School Project ” with appropr iations totaling $998,000 , a transfer of $998,000 from the Special Const Assist – Fed & St Fund to the CIP Fund, and a corresponding revenue budget for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project with no matching funds required.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Attachment 1: Resolution 22267
Attachment 2: Salinas Safe Routes to Schools Plan
Attachment 3: Alisal Safe Routes to School Project Categorical Exemption

RESOLUTION No. _______ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION TO: 1) APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ALISAL SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT; 2) APPROVE THE CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE ALISAL SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT; 3)

AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS

AND ANY REQUIRED PAPERWORK WITH CALTRANS FOR THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION GRANT PROGRAM; AND 4) AUTHORIZE THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW CIP ACCOUNT “ALISAL SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT” WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL CONST ASSIST – FED & ST FUND APPROPRIATION TOTALING $998,000 AND CORRESPONDING

REVENUE BUDGET FOR THE ALISAL SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT WITH NO MATCHING FUNDS REQUIRED.

WHEREAS, On December 14, 2021, City Council approved Resolution 22267 to appropriate $750,000 of anticipated funding from the American Rescue Plan Act towards improving the marked midblock crosswalk on Williams Road, and to direct staff to proceed with implementation to fully effectuate the intent of the Resolution; and

WHEREAS, City staff has completed plans, and specifications for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project which includes a pedestrian hybrid beacon system on Williams Road; and

WHEREAS, the City was successful in an Active Transportation Program grant application and was sele cted to be awarded grant funds in the amount of $998,000 for the improvements; and

WHEREAS, the City may need to enter into grant agreements or submit paperwork to Caltrans for the grant funding, and staff recommends that the Council authorize the director to execute all agreements and any required paperwork with Caltrans for the Active Transportation Program; and

WHEREAS, the City has determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1(c)) because the actions consists of operation and minor alteration of an existing City street.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL approves a Resolution to approve the Plans and Specifications for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves a Resolution to approve the Categorical Exemption for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1(c); and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves a Resolution to authorize the Public Works Director to execute all agreements and any required paperwork with Caltrans for the Active Transportation Grant Program; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the establishment of a new CIP Account “Alisal Safe Routes to School Project,” with appropriations totaling $998,000, transfer of $998,000 from the Special Const Assist – Fed & St Fund to the CIP Fund, and a corresponding revenue budget for the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project with no matching funds required.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

_________________________________

Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

Page | 1

RESOLUTION NO. 22267 (N.C.S.)

A MOTION APPROVING A RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE $750,000 OF

ANTICIPATED FUNDING FROM THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT TOWARDS

IMPROVING THE MARKED MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK ON WILLIAMS ROAD

WHEREAS, the City is preparing for roadway resurfacing project on Williams Road; and

WHEREAS, City staff developed new striping plans for the road to ensure everything meets existing design standards; and

WHEREAS, staff has determined the uncontrolled marked midblock crosswalk on Williams Road does not meet City policy; and

WHEREAS, staff is recommending that crosswalk markings be removed if it cannot be improved to meet City Standards; and

WHEREAS, staff estimates the minimum amount it could cost to improve the crosswalk to meet standard is $750,000; and

WHEREAS, anticipate funding from the American Rescue Plan could be appropriated towards the necessary improvements; and

WHEREAS, the City finds that action taken for the improving crosswalks is exempt under CEQA 15301, Class 1 (c) since the action consists of operation and minor alteration of existing City streets.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves a Resolution to appropriate $750,000 of anticipated funding from the American Rescue Plan Act towards improving the marked midblock crosswalk on Williams Road.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City staff is directed to proceed with implementation to fully effectuate the intent of this Resolution.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of December 2021, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: Barrera, Cromeenes, González, Osornio, Rocha, McShane, and Mayor Craig

NOES: None

ABSENT: None

ABSTAIN: None

DocuSign Envelope ID: B96B4E9A-A241-45AB-955B-61B91A484C73 Page | 2

APPROVED:

____________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: B96B4E9A-A241-45AB-955B-61B91A484C73

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-104, Version: 1
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank Application for Financing the Industrial Wastewater Treatment System Improvements Project
Approve a Resolution authorizing the submission of an application to the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank for financing the Industrial Wastewater Treatment System Improvements Project and declaration of official intent to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of an obligation.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: MARCH 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, DIRECTOR
BY: BRIAN FRUS, SENIOR ENGINEER
TITLE: SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA

INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK

FOR FINANCING THE INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER

TREATMENT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution for submission of an application to the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank for financing the Industrial Wastewater Treatment System Improvements Project and declaration of official intent to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of an obligation.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City of Salinas has initiated the application process for a loan from the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank ’s (IBank) Infrastructure State Revolving Fund Program (ISRF) to fund its Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements Project (Project). IBank was created in 1994 to finance public infrastructure and private development that promote a healthy climate for jobs, contribute to a strong economy and improve the quality of life in California communities. Through the Infrastructure State Revolving Fund (ISRF) program, IBank is authorized to directly provide low -cost public financing to state and local government entities. The City reviewed several potential funding mechanisms including state and federal grants. The IBank loan will allow the City to begin its Project on schedule while continuing to seek grants. As part of the loan application process, a Resolution from the S alinas City Council approving the loan application and potential obligation is required. The Resolution must include a maximum loan request, stated as $40 million in the Resolution, but the City is not obligated to request the maximum when the loan is fina lized if budgeted construction costs are lowered.

Adoption of the resolution at this stage of the project will enable the City to recuperate planning and design expenditures with the IBank loan upon execution (anticipated in summer 2023).

This item was presented to the Finance Committee at its March 7, 2023 meeting. The Finance Committee unanimously approved recommending the item for approval by the City Council.

Page | 2
BACKGROUND:

The City of Salinas is improving to its industrial wastewater treatment system , which treats wastewater from 22 local agriculture‐based industries. The system is comprised of a network of piping, and pump station, which covey wastewater to the Industrial Waste Treatment Facility (IWTF) for treatment and disposal. The City’s Industrial Wastewater Collection and Conveyance System (IWCCS) and IWTF are approximately 80 years old and in need of updates to increase reliability and redundancy of treatment and conveyance facilities, improve automation and control, and add energy and operatio nal efficiency. The Project will also provide source of water for regional recycled water programs.

The Project is comprised of improvements at the IWTF south of the City of Salinas in unincorporated Monterey County and the Airport Lift Station (Airport L S) at the south end of Airport Boulevard near Hansen Street in the City. Capital improvements include:
 Aeration Lagoon expansion and addition of aerators
 Pond automation and flow distribution
 Pond 3 Pumpstation expansion
 Pond aeration motor efficiency upgrades
 Influent Pump Station flow metering
 Electrical equipment relocation
 Backup power
 Airport Lift Station upgrades
Carollo Engineers supported the City in research ing available State and Federal funding mechanisms, includi ng low interest loans, grants, and Congressionally Directed Spending requests. Staff worked with State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to determine if the City could receive low-interest loans and recycled water grant funding through the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF). SWRCB determined that the City’s project was not eligible for recycled water grant funds as the project did not meet the State’s requirements as a recycled water project. In addition, due to the oversubscription of the SWRCB’s CWSRF projects must be scored and ranked for selection. A preliminary scoring of the Project and discussions with SWRCB staff indicated that the Project would likely not be selected for financing. Several other grant funding opportunities were evaluated and rejected due to length of application process, award amounts and level of effort, award timelines and other factors.

The City also identified the State IBank program as a potential funding mechanism for the Project.

The Legislature created IBank in 1994 to finance public infrastructure and private development that promote a healthy climate for jobs, contribute to a strong economy and improve the quality of life in California communities. Specifically, IBank’s ISRF Program is authorized to directl y provide low -cost public financing to state and local government entities. ISRF financing is available in amounts ranging from $1 million to $65 million with loan terms for the useful life of the project up to a maximum of 30 years. The program has funded multiple water and wastewater projects across the state, including the City of Pittsburg’s 32 million gallon -per-day water treatment plant; replacement, rehabilitation and upgrading of the City of Santa Cruz’s water Page | 3
system; and rehabilitation and replacem ent of deteriorated and over -capacity sewer mains and pipelines for the City of Laguna Beach.

Because of the pressing need to begin the project by summer 2023, City staff recommends applying for an IBank loan while continuing to seek complementary grant funding mechanisms. The City is currently completing a new rate study for its industrial customers. The new rates are expected to go into effect July 1, 2023 and will serve as the basis of repayment for the IBank loan.

IBank’s loan application process requi res a Board Resolution from applicants authorizing the application and, if awarded, debt obligation. The Resolution requires applicants to declare a loan amount, stated as $40 million in the attached Resolution, but the amount is not binding if construction costs are budgeted as lower prior to the closing of the loan. A new Resolution would be required, however, if the loan request exceeds the stated amount. All costs incurred for the project are eligible for reimbursement through loan funds as long as they are purchased within 60 days prior to the adoption of the Resolution. Because of this, early adoption of the Resolution will enable more of the costs incurred on the Project may be funded through the loan.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The environmental impacts of the project have been analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An Initial Study was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the project. Based upon review of the Initial Study, the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the mitigation measures outlined in the proposed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been included in the project.

The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were routed to responsible agencies, posted on the City’s website, and made available for review at the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and the Steinbeck Library. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were received by the State Clearinghouse (SCH# 2022100457) and staff received no comments during the public review period from October 20, 2022, to November 21, 2022. City Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project commit ted to implementing all mitigation measures and mitigation monitoring procedures included in the Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program on December 13, 2022 (Resolution No. 22538).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The IBank loan and Project it funds meet the City Council’s Strategic Plan Initiative of Economic Development. The low-interest loan is a fiscally responsible funding mechanism for the Project, which will encourage development that benefits Salinas residents and businesses and contributes to the community’s economic health.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

This project has and will continue to rely on coordination between the Water, Waste and Energy (WWE) division in Public Works, Finance, Legal and the City Manager’s office. WWE will oversee the overall execution of the Project, while coordinating with the City Manager on overall Page | 4
strategy, and with Finance and Legal for review of documents for consistency with established procedures, policy and statues.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The proposed loan amount for the Project is $40 million, which is so stated in the Required Resolution to accompany the loan. If it is determined that the required funds for construction costs are lower prior to finalization of the loan agreement, the City has the option of requesting less than the stated loan amount. Estimated payments on the loan given expected interest rate of 5% and a 30-year term are $219,000 monthly or $2.63 million annually. Staff is currently completing a new rate study which includes repayment of up to $29.1 million at the same interest rate and loan term.

The new rates are projected to go into effect July 1, 2023. All loan payments for th e Proposed Project will be expended from the Industrial Waste Enterprise Fund and will not rely on the General Fund. Staff will continue to research grant funding possibilities to reduce the total loan funding required for the Proposed Project.

FINDINGS:

Council may adopt Resolution to approve application and, if approved, obligation of an IBank loan.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank Required Resolution

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. _______(N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE

CALIFORNIA INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK FOR

FINANCING THE INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

WHEREAS, City of Salinas has initiated the application process for a loan from the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank’s (IBank) Infrastructure State Revolving Fund Program to fund its Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements Project (Project); and

WHEREAS, the IBank loan will allow the City to begin its project at the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility on schedule while continuing to seek grants; and

WHEREAS, as part of the loan application process, a Resolution from the Sal inas City Council approving the loan application and potential obligation is required; and

WHEREAS, the Resolution must include a maximum loan request, to be stated as $40 million, though if budgeted construction costs are lowered, the City is not obligated to request the maximum once the loan is finalized; and

WHEREAS, approval of the Resolution at this stage of the Project will enable the City to recuperate planning and design expenditures with the IBank loan upon execution which is anticipated in the summer 2023.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALINAS, consistent with the authority granted to the City Council, that as a requirement of the application process, the attached State required resolution is adopted in its entirety without change to verbiage and format; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of Salinas is hereby authorized and directed, for and on behalf of the City of Salinas, and as its act and deed, to submit an application to receive loan funding from the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank’s Infrastructure State Revolving Fund Program; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute non-substantive modifications to the Application and resulting Agreement, as necessary.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

Page 2 of 2 ends

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

_______________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

1 CITY OF SALINAS RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SALINAS AUTHORIZING THE

SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELO PMENT BANK (“IBANK”)

FOR FINANCING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, AUTHORIZING

THE INCURRING OF AN OBLIGATION PAYABLE TO IBANK FOR THE

FINANCING OF A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IF IBANK

APPROVES SAID APPLICATION, DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL INTENT

TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF

AN OBLIGATION, AND APPROVING CERTAIN O THER MATTERS IN

CONNECTION THEREWITH

WHEREAS, the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (“IBank”) administers a financing program to assist local gov ernments with the financing of eligible projects in accordance with Section 63000 et seq. of the California Government Code (the “Act”); and

WHEREAS, IBank created the Infrastructure State Revolving Fund Program (“ISRF Program”) pursuant to the provision of the Act; and

WHEREAS, IBank has instituted an application process for financing under its ISRF Program; and

WHEREAS, IBank’s Criteria, Priorities and Guidelines for the Selection of Projects for Financing under the ISRF Program, dated February 23, 2016 , and as may thereafter be amended from time to time (the “Criteria”), establishes requirements for the financing of projects under the ISRF Program; and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas (“Applicant”) desires to submit an application (“Financing Application”) to IBank under the ISRF Program for financing and refinancing the costs of the Salinas Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements Project (“Project”) in an amount not to exceed $__40,000,000________; and

WHEREAS, the Act and the Criteria require the Applicant to make, by resolution of its governing body, certain findings prior to a p roject being selected f or financing by IBank; and

WHEREAS, the Applicant expects to incur or pay certain expenditures in connection with the Project from its dedicated Industrial Waste Enterprise Funds that is reimbursable with the proceeds of tax exempt bonds or other tax exempt securities under Federal Tax Law (defined below) prior to incurring indebtedness for the purpose of financing costs associated with the Project on a long -term basis (the “Reimbursement Expenditures”); and

WHEREAS, the Applicant reasonably expects that a financing arrangement 2 (“Obligation”) in an amount not expected to exceed $_40,000,000__ will be entered into under and memorialized by one or more financing agreements and related documents (collectively, the “Financing Agreement”) and that certain proceeds of such Obligation will be used to reimburse the Applicant for Reimbursement Expenditures incurred or paid prior to incurring the Obligation; and

WHEREAS, the Applicant acknowledges that IBank funds the ISRF Program, in part, with the proceeds of tax exempt bonds and, as such, has certain compliance obligations that may require it to have the Applicant enter into one or more new financing agreements to repl ace the Financing Agreement ( collectively, the “Replacement Agreement”) on terms and conditions substantially identical to the original Financing Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Salinas as follows:

Section 1. The Council of the City of Salinas hereby approves confirms, ratifies, and affirms all actions of the Applicant’s representatives, employees and officers heretofore taken in connection with, or with respect to, submitting the Financing Application, and t he consideration and approval of the Obligation and the Financing Agreement, if IBank approves the Financing Application and the Obligation , and in connection therewith the Council of the City of Salinas finds and certifies:

a. The Project facilitates the effective and efficient use of existing and future public resources so as to promote both economic development and conservation of natural resources;
b. The Project develops and enhances public infrastructure in a manner that will attract, create, and sustain long-term employment opportunities; c. That the Project is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Salinas, and the General Plan of the County of Monterey;
d. The proposed financing is appropriate for the Project; e. The Project is consistent with the Criteria; and
f. It has considered (i) the impact of the Project on California’s land resources and the need to preserve such resources; (ii) whether the Project is economically or socially desirable; and (iii) whether the project is consistent with, and in furt herance of the State Environmental Goals and Policy Report (as defined in the Criteria).

Section 2. The Applicant hereby declares its official intent to use proceeds of the Obligation to reimburse itself for the Reimbursement Expenditures with the proceeds of tax exempt bonds or other tax exempt securities issued under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and those Treasury Regulations implementing such provisions (collectively, “Federal Tax Law”). This declaration is made solely for purposes of establishing compliance with applicable requirements of Federal Tax Law and its date is controlling for purposes of reimbursement under Federal Tax Law.

This declaration does not bind the Applicant to make any expenditur e, incur any indebtedness, or proceed with the Project.
3 Section 3. All of the Reimbursement Expenditures were made no earlier than 60 days prior to the date of this Resolution . The Applicant will allocate proceeds of the Obligation to pay Reimbursement Expenditures within eighteen (18) months of the later of the date the original expenditure was paid or the date the Project was placed in service or abandoned, but in no event more than three (3) years after the original expenditure was paid.

Section 4. The City Manager and his or her designee is hereby authorized and directed to act on behalf of the Applicant in all matters pertaining to the Financing Application, and if IBank approves the Financing Application and the Obligation , the execution of related financial documents, including but not limited to, the authority to: (i) pledge the revenues of the Industrial Waste Enterprise Fund and all legall y available amounts in the Industrial Waste Enterprise Fund , on a parity basis with the Applicant’s obligations in connection with the remaining debt of $1,493,000 on a 2015 HUD loan of $4.0 million which is expected to be paid off by the end of FY 2025 , to the repayment of the Obligation, (ii) provide covenants relating to, among other things, maintaining the debt service coverage ratio required by IBank, rates and charges to be pledged, and as to any other security or collateral securing the Obligation, and (iii) take any other action necessary or desirable to enable the Applicant to enter into the Financing Agreement and incur the Obligation.

Section 5. If the Financing Application and the Obligation is approved by IBank, the City Manager and his or her designee is authorized to negotiate, enter into and sign financing documents and any amendments thereto , including, but not limited to the Financing Agreement and the Replacement Agreement, with IBank for the purposes of financing the Obligation.

Section 6. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

* * * *

4 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Salinas in a regular meeting assembled on the 21st day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City of Salinas this 21st day of March 2023.

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
City of Salinas

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-160, Version: 1
Central Park Tennis Courts Wall Replacement and Resurfacing and Claremont Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing; CIP No. 9022
Approve a Resolution accepting the Central Park Tennis Courts Wall Replacement and Resurfacing and Claremont Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing; CIP No. 9022, for maintenance and responsibility.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/16/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
`

DATE: MARCH 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, P.E., L.S., DIRECTOR
THRU: ELISE RAMIREZ, P.E., SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER
BY: JOSIE LANTACA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER
TITLE: CENTRAL PARK TENNIS COURTS WALL REPLACEMENT AND

RESURFACING AND CLAR EMONT PARK TENNIS CO URTS
RESURFACING, CIP NO. 9022

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a resolution accepting the Central Park Tennis Courts Wall Replacement and Resurfacing and Claremont Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing, CIP No. 9022, for maintenance and responsibility.

BACKGROUND:

The Central Park Tennis Courts Wall Replacement and Resurfacing and Claremont Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing Project is part of the Tennis Courts Improvement Project (CIP 9022) listed in the adopted Capital Improvement Pro gram (CIP). The Project’s scope of work include d the following:

Central Park Tennis Courts Wall Replacement (Base Bid 1): Removal and disposal of the existing 10-ft high tennis court backstop at Central Park, and the construction of a new 10-ft high tennis court backstop/wall at the same location.

Claremont Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing (Base Bid 2): Resurfacing the existing tennis courts by removing the existing s urface and installing a slipsheet system including all surface preparations , application of color finish, multi -sport (tennis and pickleball) striping, removal and disposal of existing fence windscreens, and installation of a new fence windscreen on the existing 10-ft chain link fence.

Central Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing (Additive Alternative “A”): Resurfacing the existing tennis courts with acrylic overlay including all surface preparations and repairs, application of color finish, tennis game striping, removal and disposal of existing fence windscreens, and installation of new fence windscreen on the existing 10 -ft chain link fence, and replacement of a portion of the existing chain link fence.

Page | 2
On June 21, 2022, City Council awarded the Central Park Tennis Courts Wall Replacement and Resurfacing and Claremont Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing, CIP No. 9022 to Vintage Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $331,362.00 (Base Bid 1, Base Bid 2, and Additive Alternative “A”).

Construction commenced on September 12, 2022, and the work was substantially complete on December 20, 2022. Two contract change orders were administratively authorized and approved per Department Policy 75-1 (Resolution No. 21528). Below is a summary of these change orders:

Table 1: Project Change Orders
Change
Order
No.

RFI # Description Change Order
Amount
1 1 Surface repairs due to tree root damage at Central Park $ 2,369.87 2 New posts and nets at Central Park Tennis Courts including installation costs
$ 7,029.86
CCO No. 1 (Total): $ 9,399.73

2 8 Claremont Park fence repairs (Bottom Rails) $ 2,147.28 CCO No. 2 (Total): $ 2,147.28

TOTAL CCOs (1+2): $ 11,547.01

The project has been deemed complete and the construction methods and materials met the project plans and specifications requirements.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

This project has been reviewed per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, and has been determined to be Categorically Exempt in accordance with Section 15301 et seq. (Class 1) because the project proposes the maintenance/repair and resurfacing of tennis courts, and Section 15302 et seq. (Class 2) because the project (Base Bid 1) proposes to replace the existing tennis courts ball wall, and the new ball wall will be located on the same location/site as the structure being replaced and will have the same use and purpose.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The project addresses the City Council Goals of Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, Public Safety, and Youth and Seniors by providing safe recreational facilities for Salinas residents.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The process of administering this project involved Public Works, Library and Community Services, Finance, and Legal Departments.

Public Works Department prepared the project’s plans, specifications, and estimates, and administered the bidding process, managed the construction, and inspected the project. The project Page | 3
is a CIP for the Library and Community Services Department. Finance Department manage d the proper disbursement of funds, and Legal Department review ed pertinent documents/contracts to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Over the past five years, there’s been a total of $625,000 adopted into the budget for this CIP 9022 (Tennis Courts Improvement Project) from Measure E funds . The total construction cost was $342,909.01 including the two contract change orders. Contract change orders are summarized on Table 1 which equate to $11,547.01 (approximately 3.5% above the original award amount). The project was completed within the approved budget. As of March 2, 2023, there is a total unencumbered balance of $222,622.98 in the CIP 9022 account.

ATTACHMENT:

Resolution

1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING CENTRAL PARK

TENNIS COURTS WALL REPLACEMENT AND RESURFACING AND CLAREMONT PARK TENNIS COURTS RESURFACING, CIP NO. 9022, FOR MAINTENANCE AND

RESPONSIBILITY

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2022, City Council awarded the Central Park Tennis Courts Wall Replacement and Resurfacing and Claremont Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing , CIP No. 9022 to Vintage Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $331,362.00 (Base Bid 1 plus Base Bid 2 plus Additive Alternative “A”); and

WHEREAS, the project demolished and replaced the existing 10 -ft high tennis courts backstop, resurfaced the existing tennis courts , applied new color finish, installed new striping, removed and replaced all fence windscreens, and replaced portion of the existing chain link fence at Central Park; and

WHEREAS, the project resurfaced the tennis courts over a slipsheet overlay system , applied new color finish, installed multi-sport (tennis and pickleball) striping, remov ed and replaced all fence windscreens, and repaired some of the fence bottom rails at Claremont Park ; and

WHEREAS, the work has been inspected to meet the requirements of the project plans and specifications; and

WHEREAS, the project was substantially completed on December 20, 2022; and

WHEREAS, the total construction cost including Change Orders No . 1 and 2, is $342,909.01;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council accepts this project for maintenance and responsibility.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

2 APPROVED:

________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-175, Version: 1
Emergency Motel Program Room Rental Agreements
Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Room Rental Agreement with JS Inc. for the purpose of providing emergency housing to unhoused City residents in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000; and to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 22MoCoARPA03 with Marina Hotels Ci, LLC to add an additional $115,000 of City Encampment Resolution Funds (ERF) and $135,000 of City American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for a total amount not to exceed $907,000.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: MARCH 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FROM: MEGAN HUNTER, DIRECTOR
BY: ROD POWELL, PLANNING MANAGER
TITLE: EMERGENCY MOTEL PROGRAM ROOM RENTAL

AGREEMENTS

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing:

1. the City Manager to execute a Room Rental Agreement with JS Inc. for the purpose of providing emergency housing to unhoused City residents in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000; and

2. the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 22MoCoARPA03 with Marina Hotels Ci, LLC to add an additional $115,000 of Encampment Resolution Funds (ERF) and $135,000 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds dedicated to the Homeless Motel Program for a total amount not to exceed $907,000.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Currently, as a result of the City’s competitive H2A environment, the City is operating a jointly funded City/County Emergency Motel Program (EMP) at the Count ry Inn in the City of Marina.

In October 2022, Council approved the acceptance of County ARPA funds and the execution of an initial Room Rental Agreement with Marina Hotel Ci, LLC to rent up to sixty (60) motel rooms through February 28, 2023 to support the EMP in providing much needed emergency shelter to unhoused residents as they navigate to permanent housing options. In consideration of available funding, persistent inclement winter weather, and ongoing City homeless services initiatives, Amendment No. 1 to the agreement was executed on January 27, 2023, to extend the term of the Agreement through the winter months to April 30, 2023.

Since its inception, staff have worked diligently to identify a new EMP location within the City’s jurisdiction and have finally been able to negotiate a viable, affordable option with JS Inc. for use of the Steinbeck Lodge at 109 John Street with a start date of April 1, 2023. In order to prevent a gap in housing f or current EMP participants during the relocation of the program an increase to the current Agreement with Marina Hotels, Ci, LLC is necessary. Prior Council directed ARPA for the Homeless Motel Program and ERF funding will support continued EMP operations at the new Salinas location.

Page | 2
BACKGROUND:

The City of Salinas has been administering an EMP at the Country Inn in the City of Marina since October 2021. The City and County of Monterey have jointly funded the program through a mix of Council de signated City ARPA for the Homeless Motel Program , HUD ESG -Covid, HCD CESH and Cal ICH ERF funds and contractually allocated County of Monterey Project Roomkey (PRK) and ARPA funds.

Initially based upon a PRK model, t he EMP program has been instrumental in providing emergency housing opportunities , housing navigation and subsidies to vulnerable unhoused residents throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. The program also serves as a significant supportive resource to other priority City initiatives such as Heal th & Safety Days , the resolution and restoration of the Natividad Creek Park encampments and developing Salinas Soccer Complex , and much needed emergency shelter in times of inclement weather. In more recent months, following the full expenditure of PRK f unds, the City has incorporated a more robust housing navigation component within the program and, to date, has transitioned more than forty-five (45) EMP participants to permanent housing.

DISCUSSION:

Since its inception, and due to the competitive H2A motel contracting environment in the City, the EMP has been forced to operate at a location outside of the City’s jurisdiction, the Country Inn in the City of Marina. This has not been optimum for program residents as most are Salinas residents and would prefer to relocate and receive services within the Salinas community. With this in mind, Community Development Department (CDD) staff have persistently continued to explore and identify potential options to allow for movement of the program to a new location within the City’s jurisdiction and have been able to successfully negotiate a proposed agreement with JS Inc. to rent all of the forty-three (43) rooms of the Steinbeck Lodge located at 109 John Street.

Execution of the proposed Room Rental Agreement would allow for the full movement of all existing EMP participants and existing service providers, CSUMB CHE and CCCIL. Similarly, the City will also seek to amend the scope of its existing agreement with Benitez Security Services, Inc. to transfer the provision of EMP site security services to the new location at a reduced rate considerate of the facility’s size and capacity.

Supportive funding to continue EMP operations for an additional year are in place through a mix of City ARPA and Cal ICH ERF1 funds. The City has also requested additional supportive funding as part of its recently submitted Cal ICH ERF2 grant application. It is anticipated that an additional fourteen (14) EMP participants will move to a permanent Homekey housing opportuni ty in April making way for additional program participants to take advantage of the effective, results-oriented service model.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

Page | 3

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The proposed Agreement with JS Inc. and Amendment No. 2 with Marina Hotels Ci, LLC each support the City of Salinas Strategic Plan 2022-2025 goal of Housing/Affordable Housing.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

CDD’s Economic Development and Housing & Community Development Divisions have jointly coordinated on this item under consultation with the City Attorney.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Authorization to execute the proposed Agreement with JS Inc. not to exceed $1.5 million from appropriated funding through the American Rescue Plan Act dedicated to the Homeless Motel Program, Project Roomkey Motel Program (County ARPA division), and Encampment Resolution Fund. Amendment No. 2 with Marina Hotels Ci, LLC will require the continued use of existing American Rescue Pl an Act (ARPA) dedicated to the Homeless Motel Program and use of Encampment Resolution Fund (ERF) funds. Funds are appropriated and available in the appropriate expenditure accounts. No matching City funds are required.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Room Rental Agreement with JS Inc. - draft
Amendment No. 2 Room Rental Agreement with Marina Hotels Ci, LLC.

1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A ROOM RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH JS, INC. AND EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT 22MoCoARPA03 WITH MARINA HOTELS Ci, LLC

WHEREAS, the Covid-19 pandemic continues to significantly impact congregate living shelter opportunities resulting in limited capacity and lengthy waiting lists for available beds within the City of Salinas and County of Monterey shelter system; and

WHEREAS, the City of Sal inas has utilized various hotels to provide non -congregate shelter options to individuals experiencing homelessness to protect human life and minimize strain on health care system capacity; and

WHEREAS, on September 14, 2021, the Salinas City Council appr oved Resolution No. 22175 authorizing the allocation of $3 million of American Rescue Plan Act funds to a Salinas Homeless Motel Program; and

WHEREAS, on October 26, 2021, the Salinas City Council approved Resolution No. 22235 authorizing the City to enter into a Standard Agreement with the County of Monterey to accept Project RoomKey funds to administer an Emergency Motel Program; and

WHEREAS, on September 22, 2022, the Salinas City Council approved Resolution No. 22484 to add County of Monterey American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds and extend the terms of Standard Agreement #5010 -197 to allow continued operation and administration of the Emergency Motel Program; and

WHEREAS, on October 4, 2022, the Salinas City Council approved Resolution No. 22493 authorizing the execution of a Room Rental Agreement with Marina Hotels Ci, LLC to provide emergency housing opportunities for the Emergency Motel Program through February 28, 2023; and

WHEREAS, on January 27, 2023, the City Manager executed Amendment No. 1 to Agreement 22MoCoARPA03 to extend the term through to April 30, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the City’s Emergency Motel Program in the City of Marina that continues to receive sustained interest from homeless residents during the winter months and regularly sits at or near capacity; and

WHEREAS, since its inception, the Emergency Motel Program has placed forty -five unhoused residents in permanent housing and anticipates an addi tional fourteen placements in upcoming months; and

WHEREAS, the City desires to continue operations and produce vital housing outcomes for City residents in support of City initiatives such as Health & Safety Days, the resolution and restoration of the Natividad Creek Park encampments and developing Salinas Soccer Complex, and 2 much needed emergency shelter in times of inclement weather;

WHEREAS, City staff have identified a viable location to relocate the Emergency Motel Program to a preferred location within the City’s jurisdiction and ha ve successfully negotiated a Room Rental Agreement with JS Inc. for full use of the forty -three room Steinbeck Lodge at 109 John Street; and

WHEREAS, funding to support the operations of the City’s Emergency Motel Program at the Steinbeck Lodge will come from appropriated funding though the American Rescue Plan Act dedicated to the Homeless Motel Program , Project Roomkey Motel Program (County ARPA division), and Encampment Resolution Fund; and

WHEREAS, funding to support Amendment No. 2 with Marina Hotel Ci, LLC will come from appropriated funding through the Encampment Resolution Fund and American Rescue Plan Act dedicated to the Homeless Motel Program; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute a Room Rental Agreement with JS Inc ., in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 from appropriated funding through the American Rescue Plan Act dedicated to the Homeless Motel Program , Project Roomkey Motel Program (County ARPA division), and Encampment Resolution Fund; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Salinas City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 22MoCoARPA03 with Marina Hotels Ci, LLC to add an additional $115,000 of appropriated funding through the Encampment Resolution Fund and an additional $135,000 of American Rescue Plan Act appropriations dedicated to the Homeless Motel Program for a total amount not to exceed $907,000.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

______________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor

3 ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

City of Salinas
Lease Agreement – 109 John St
April 1, 2023

ROOM RENTAL AGREEMENT

EMERGENCY SHELTER PROGRAM

1 ROOM RENTAL AGREEMENT

Steinbeck Lodge
109 John St, Salinas, California

THIS ROOM RENTAL AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 21st day of March 2023, by and between the City of Salinas, a California charter city and municipal corporation, hereinafter called the “City,” and JS INC. a California Stock Corporation, hereinafter called “Operator.” City and Operator may sometimes collectively be referred to Parties herein.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Operator holds a ground lease at the Steinbeck Lodge located at 109 John Street in the City of Salinas, California, County of Monterey (the “Premises”); and

WHEREAS, the Operator has obtained Lessor’s written consent authorizing the City of Salinas to enter into this Room Rental Agreement at the Premises; and

WHEREAS, the City desires to rent from the Operator forty-three (43) hotel rooms in the Premises to house unsheltered individuals through the City’s Emergency Shelter Program (the “Program”) and the Operator desires to rent to the City forty-three (43) hotel rooms within the Premises upon the terms and subject to the conditions contained herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. PREMISES. The City hereby agrees to rent from the Operator and the Operator hereby agrees to rent to the City up to forty-three (43) hotel rooms within the Premises, upon the terms and conditions herein set forth herein . The City shall accept the hotel rooms “as -is, where-is” following an inspection of the hotel rooms.

2. TERM. This Agreement shall be for a term of twelve (12) months, commencing as of April 1, 2023, ("Commencement Date"), and ending on March 31, 2024 (the “Initial Term”), unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provision of this Lease. Upon the expira tion or the earlier termination of this Agreement, the City shall have all individuals placed within the hotel rooms peaceably vacate the Premises and any and all improvements located thereon and deliver the same to the Operator in at least as good a condi tion as it was delivered to the City on the Commencement Date, reasonable wear and tear and casualty excepted.

3. Extended Term. Provided the City is not in default under this Agreement beyond any applicable notice and cure periods, the City may elect to renew this Lease Agreement yearly for

2 two 12-month terms (“the “Extended Term”) by providing written notice to the Operator at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term. If the City elects to renew, the Extended Term of the Agreement, except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, shall be on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein.

4. RENT. As consideration for the use of rooms within the Premises, City agrees to pay to the Operator eighty-five dollars per room $85 for a total amount of one hundred and eleven thousand one hundred and seventy -two with ninety -two cents ($111,172,.92) per month. The total amount of consideration to be paid to the Operator through the Initial Term of this Agreement shall not exceed one million three hundred thirty -four thousand and seventy -five dollars ($1,334,075).

5. USE. City shall only use rooms within the Pr emises only to provide temporary emergency shelter and housing services for unsheltered individuals through the Program.

a. Cleaning. City and its onsite partners shall coordinate with Operator and its onsite manager on weekly cleaning of the rooms used by the City during the term of this Agreement.

b. Maintenance and Repairs. Except as may be provided elsewhere in this Agreement, the City shall perform, at its own cost and expense, the repair and replacement of the rooms and any fixtures located therein that are damaged by occupants of the rooms who are participants in the Program. City shall maintain a reserve account with one hundred -sixty five thousand, nine hundred and twenty -five dollars ($165,925) for maintenan ce and repair of damages caused by the Participants in the Program.

6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. City shall comply with all statutes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements of all governmental entities, both federal and state and county or municipal relating to City’s use and occupancy of the Premises whether those statutes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements are now in force or are subsequently enacted.

7. UTILITIES. The Operator shall pay, and hold the City free and harmless from, all charges for the furnishing of gas, water, electricity, telephone/communications service, garbage pickup and disposal, and other utilities to the hotel rooms used by the City during the term of this Agreement.

8. INDEMNIFICATION. City agrees to hold harmless, and indemnify Operator and its officers, officials, and employees from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, and costs of every nature arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or City’s failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except such loss or damage which was caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the Operator or any of its officers, officials, or employees.

3 9. INSURANCE. Operator shall, at its own cost and expense, maintain insurance covering the Premises.

10. ENTRY AND INSPECTION. The City shall have the right to enter the Premises at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspection, posting notices, or other lawful purposes.

11. REMOVAL OF PERSONAL PROPERTY; RESTORATION OF PROPERTY. No later than the expiration or the earlier termination of this Agreement, the City shall at its sole cost and expense remove all items of personal property placed in the Premises by the City or any of the occupants of the rooms within the Premises that are rented by the City and who are participants in the Program. Upon expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, City shall surrender the Premises, including all rooms rented by it, to Operator in reasonably good condition and repair, ordinary wear and tear excepted.

12. FORCE MAJEURE. If either party is unable to perform its duties under this Agreement due to acts of God, strikes, lockouts, labor disputes, inability to obtain labor, governmental restrictions, regulations or controls, civil commotion, fire or other casualty, emergency, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of the party, such non -performing party shall be excused from performance by the other party, and shall not be in breach of this Agreement, for a period equal to any such prevention, delay or stoppage.

13. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. Except as otherwise provided for herein, the parties expressly agree that, subject to the terms of this Agreement, all terms and conditions of this Agreement shall extend to and be bindi ng upon or inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, personal representative, assigns and successors in interest of both the respective parties hereto.

14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement expresses the whole contract between the parties, there being no representations, warranties, or other understandings not here expressly set forth or provided. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original, but such duplicate together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

15. AMENDMENTS. This Agreement may be amended at any time and from time to time, provided that no amendment to this Agreement shall be legally enforceable against the City or Tenant unless it is in writing, executed and acknowledged by both parties.

16. NOTICES. All notices herein provided to be given, or which may be given, by either party to the other, shall be deemed to have been given fully, when made in writing and personally delivered as shown below, or deposited in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:

City: City of Salinas Operator: JS Inc. DBA Steinbeck Lodge 200 Lincoln Avenue 109 John St

4 Salinas, CA 93901 Salinas CA 93906
Attn: City Manager Attn: Dinesh Jadav
w/copy to: City Attorney

17. WARRANTY OF TITLE. Operator represents and warrants that it has the sole and the exclusive title to the Premises such that it may enter into this Agreement. Operator further warrants and represents that the execution, delivery, or performance of this Agreement will not conflict with or violation any other agreements by which the Operator is bound, or any law, rules, regulation, or ordinance by which the Operator is bound.

18. NON-DISCRIMINATION IN USE AND AVAILABILITY. City shall not discriminate on the basis of a person’s place of residence, their race, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation, against any participant in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by the City at the Premises. City shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in the provision of any services or programs offered at the Premises.

19. ADA COMPLIANCE AND DISCLOSURE. Operator represents and warrants that the Premises (as of the Commencement Date of this Agreement) is in conf ormance with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and all regulations issued by the U.S.

Attorney General or other authorized agencies under the authority of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA Laws”). Operator shall be responsible , at its sole expense, for making any alterations, modifications needed to comply with the requirements of the ADA and all related Laws, and to bear any expense during the Initial Term and any renewal thereof to ensure the ongoing compliance with any of the ADA Laws. Operator shall reimburse and indemnify City for any expenses incurred because of the failure of the Premises to conform with the ADA Laws, including the costs of making any alterations, renovations or accommodations required by the ADA laws, any governmental enforcement agency or any court, any and all fines, civil penalties and damages awarded against City resulting from a violation or violations of the ADA Laws and all reasonable legal expenses incurred in defending claims made under the ADA L aws, including reasonable attorney’s fees.

Operator and City hereby acknowledge s that pursuant to Section 1938 of the California Civil Code, if the Premises have not been inspected by a Certified Access Specialist (a “CASp”) prior to the execution of the Agreement, then the following disclosure shall be included in the Agreement:

“A Certified Access Specialist (CASp) can inspect the subject Premises and determine whether the subject Premises comply with all of the applicable construction -related accessibility standards under state law. Although state law does not require a CASp inspection of the subject Premises, the commercial property Operator or Operator may not prohibit the City or City from obtaining a CASp inspection of the subject Premises for the occupancy or potential occupancy of

5 the City or City, if requested by the City or City. The parties shall mutually agree on the arrangements for the time and manner of the CASp inspection, the payment of the fee for the CASp inspection.”

Operator shall be responsible for the cost of making any repairs necessary to correct violations of construction-related accessibility standards within the Premises.

20. JURISDICTION. This Agreement shall be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in the State of California, in the County of Monterey, or in the appropriate federal court with jurisdiction over the matter. In case suit shall be brought to interpret or to enforce this Agreement, or because of the breach of any other covenant or provision herein contained, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorney fees in addition to such costs as may be allowed by the court. City’s attorney fees, if awarded, shall be calculated at the market rate.

21. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single agreement.

22. FURTHER ASSURANCES. Both parties agree to take whatever action may be necessary to perform their respective and their mutual obligations under this Agreement.

23. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS LEASE. By entering into this Agreement, the Parties do not intend to create any obligations express or implied other than those set out herein; further, this Agreement shall not create any rights in any party not a signatory hereto.

24. INVALIDITY. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provisions of t his Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as authorized representatives of the parties, have entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY OF SALINAS JS INC,

Steven S. Carrigan, City Manager Dinesh Jadav, President

APPROVED AS FORM:

Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney

Page 1 of 1 ends

City of Salinas
Amendment No. 1 – 3280 Dunes Rd.

January 27th, 2023

AGREEMENT —AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

ROOM RENTAL AGREEMENT

BETWEEN MARINA HOTELS CI, LLC,

AND CITY OF SALINAS

Agreement Number: 22MoCoARPA03

This Amendment No. 2 to the Room Rental Agreement (Amendment) is entered into this 21st day of March, 2023 , by and between the City of Salinas (City) and Marina Hotels Ci, LLC, (Owner). City and Owner may be individually referred to herein as a “Party” and collectively the City and Owner may be referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and Owner first entered into a Room Rental Agreement effective October 1, 2022, pursuant to which Owner agreed to act as and provide certain services to the City for compensation (Agreement); and

WHEREAS, the City and Owner entered into Amendment No. 1 on January 27, 2023 to extend term of services commence October 1, 2022 and ending on April 30, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the City and Owner desire to increase the Agreement amount by $250,000 through this Amendment No.2, using Encampment Resolution Grant and City ARPA funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, in mutual consideration of the terms and conditions set forth below, the Parties agree as follows:

TERMS

1. The Agreement sections below will be amended as follows:

Section 3 “RENT” is revised to read as follows:

As consideration for the use of rooms within the Premises, City agrees to pay to the Owner the total amount of seventy -three dollars ($73.00) per day per room actually used by the City for the Program, plus damages to rooms. The total amount of consideration to be paid to the Owner through the Initial Term of this Agreement shall not exceed Nine Hundred and Seven Thousand and zero cents ($907,000.00).

2. All other covenants, terms, and conditions set forth in the Original Funding Agreement and Amendment No. 1 which are not herein amended, shall remain in full force and effect as if fully set forth herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as authorized representatives of the City and Owner have entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.

City of Salinas Grantee:

By:

By:

Steven S. Carrigan., City Manager Nupen Patel, President & CEO APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-181, Version: 1
California Energy Commission Acceptance and Appropriation of Funding Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any agreement or related documents necessary to accept up to $80,000 from the California Energy Commission for the California Automated Permit Processing Program (CalAPP); and authorizing an appropriation of up to $80,000 in funding to the Community Development Department, Permit Services Division to fund said program.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: MARCH 21, 2023

DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

FROM: MEGAN HUNTER, DIRECTOR

BY: MELISSA GUILFOYLE, ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I

TITLE: ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIAT ION OF UP TO $80,000 OF

FUNDING FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

FOR THE CALIFORNIA AUTOMATED PERMIT PROCESSING
PROGRAM (CalAPP)

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a resolution authorizing:

1) the City Manager or designee to execute any agreement or related documents necessary to accept up to $80,000 from the California Energy Commission for the California Automated Permit Processing Program (CalAPP); and
2) Permit Services Fund appropriations totaling up to $80,000, if CalAPP funds are approved, in the Community Development Department, Permit Services Division to fund temporary pay, outside services, computer software and hardware, and training to implement said program.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On March 3, 2023, Permit Services applied for a grant with the California Energy Commission to help fund the streamlining of residential solar applications. The total amount of funding for the State of California is $20 million and will be awarded on a first come , first served basis. The deadline to apply is June 30, 2023, but because funding is limited and could be expended before that date, the City of Salinas applied earlier on March 3, 2023. Shortly after submitting the application, the City of Salinas received a Payee Data Record Form to receive funding. Based on population, the City is eligible for $80,000 through the California Automated Permit Processing Program (CalAPP)to assist with the integration of an automated solar permit software application called SolarAPP+.

Page | 2
BACKGROUND:

In December 2022, Senate Bill 379 was passed by the State of California legislature. The goal of SB 379 is to streamline permitting for solar energy systems to promote the development of solar energy and storage projects in the state. Per Senate Bill 379 most jurisdictions in California are required to implement an automated permitting platform that verifies code compliance and issues permits in real time. This automated permitting platform must be adopted by each jurisdiction and be fully functional by September 2023.

DISCUSSION:

CalAPP funding is intended to encourage cities to accelerate processing and turnaround time for residential solar permits. This funding is ultimately intended to help California meet its greenhouse gas emission reduction goals through an easier installation process and reduction in permitting costs for local governments. The amount awarded is based on the population of the city. The City of Salinas is eligible for $80,000 due to its population falling between 100,000 and 200,000 residents.

The grant allows the funds to be used for the following budget items; ongoing in-house staff labor costs associated with adoption and maintenance of the platform, ongoing third-party or consultant time associated directly with adoption and maintenance of the platform, ongoing staff training and education, training events, su bscription costs for permit tracking software in support of the platform, as well as essential hardware or equipment necessary to support adoption of the platform.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action – “authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any agreement or related documents necessary to accept up to $80,000 from the California Energy Commission for the California Automated Permit Processing Program (CalAPP) and related appropriation ” is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378)

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The CalAPP grant aligns with the City’s “Effective and Culturally Responsive Government” strategic plan initiative. The funding will allow the Permit Services Division to close technology gaps by streamlining the efficiency of residential solar permits

The CalAPP grant aligns with the City’s “Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability” strategic plan initiative. The funding will allow the City of Salinas to participate in a statewide initiative to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by making it faster and easier for residents to obtain permits for residential solar panels.

Page | 3
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The CalAPP grant will be administered by the City’s Permit Services Division in the Community Development Department ( CDD). CDD will coordinate and collaborate with the City’s Finance and Legal Departments to review any related agreements and ensure the efficient, full disbursement of funds.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Additional costs for the implementation of the automated residential solar application will be supplemented by the Permit Services Enterprise fund. There is no General Fund impact.

Funding would be appropriated to the following accounts:

 up to $20,000 will be place d in the account “Outside Services Other Outside Services.” The funds in this account will be used for consultants to assist with software integration and for a public relation’s firm to assist with public education. G/L account 6900.30.3350-

63.6010
 up to $15,000 will be placed in the account “Other Charges Training.” The funds in this account will be used to send Permit Services staff to trainings in order to educate staff to more efficiently utilize the software application. G/L account 6900.30.3350-64.2500.  up to $15,000 will be placed in the account “Supplies & Materials Computer Supplies & Hardware.” The funds in this account will be used to purchase necessary computer supplies to effectively run the software application. G/L account 6900.30.3350-62.8520.  up to $30,000 will be placed in the account “Salaries & Benefits Temporary Pay.” The funds in this account will be used to hire temporary staff that will assist in the implementation and maintenance of the software platform. G/L account 6900.30.3350 -

61.2000.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
California Automated Permit Processing Program Grant Funding Opportunity Notice

1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE UP TO $80,000 OF FUNDING

FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FOR THE CALIFORNIA AUTOMATED PERMIT PROCESSING PROGRAM (CalAPP)

WHEREAS, in December 2022, the State of California passed Senate Bill 379 requiring cities to implement an online, automated permitting platform that verifies code compliance and issues permits in real time for residential solar energy systems ; and

WHEREAS, in Senate Bill 129 the State of California requires all cities, counties and jurisdiction s over 5,000 residents to have an automated permitting platform for residential solar permits by September 2023 ; and

WHEREAS, in Senate Bill 12 9 the State of California appropriated $20 million in funding to the California Energy Commission to support cities in enhancing their residential solar permitting processes on a first come first served bas is; and

WHEREAS, on March 3, 2023, the Community Development Department submitted an application for $80,000 in funding from the California Automated Permit Processing Program grant to implement a n automated residential solar permitting software platform, SolarAPP+ ; and

WHEREAS, shortly thereafter, the City of Salinas received a Payee Data Record Form to receive funding through the State of California for the California Automated Permit Processing Program (CalAPP).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute any agreement or related documents necessary to accept up to $80,000 of funding from the California Energy Commission for the California Automated Permit Processing Program (CalAPP); ands

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salians City Council authorizes the appropriation of up to $80,000 , if CalAPP funds are approved, to the Community Development Department, Permit Services Division, Enterprise Fund 6900 for temporary salaries, outside services, computer software and hardware, and training to implement the automated residential solar permitting platform.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March 21, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

2 ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST:

Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

GRANT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY

California Automated Permit Processing Program

GFO-21-402
Addendum 01
https://www.energy.ca.gov/funding-opportunities/solicitations State of California
California Energy Commission
June 2022

June 2022 Page i GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE OF SOLICITATION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 B. KEY WORDS/TERMS .............................................................................................................................................. 2 C. PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK ....................................................................................................................................... 2 D. FUNDING ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 E. KEY ACTIVITIES SCHEDULE ....................................................................................................................................... 6 F. QUESTIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 G. APPLICANTS’ ADMONISHMENT & RESPONSIBILITY........................................................................................................ 7 H. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 II. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................................... 9 A. ELIGIBILITY ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 B. FIRST-COME, FIRST-SERVED .................................................................................................................................... 9 C. TERMS AND CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 9 III. APPLICATION ORGANIZATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS .............................................................. 10 A. APPLICATION CONTENT ........................................................................................................................................ 10 B. METHOD FOR DELIVERY ....................................................................................................................................... 10 IV. EVALUATION AND AWARD PROCESS ......................................................................................................... 11 A. APPLICATION EVALUATION .................................................................................................................................... 11 B. NOTICE OF PROPOSED AWARD AND AGREEMENT DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................. 11 C. GROUNDS TO REJECT AN APPLICATION OR CANCEL AN AWARD ..................................................................................... 12 D. MISCELLANEOUS ................................................................................................................................................. 12 E. EVALUATION CRITERIA .......................................................................................................................................... 13

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment
Number
Title of Section
01 Application Form (requires signature)
02 Agreement Terms and Conditions

June 2022 Page 1 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
I. Introduction
NOTE: This solicitation is for the California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP) Program and the solicitation documents are unique and different from other California Energy Commission solicitations. Please do not use attachments from other Energy Commission grant solicitations as this will result in disqualification (e.g., EPIC and FPIP programs).

A. PURPOSE OF SOLICITATION
The purpose of this solicitation is to provide funding for California cities, counties, or cities and counties, to establish online, automated solar permitting. Senate Bill 129 (Skinner, Budget Act of 2021) appropriates $20 million in funding to the California Energy Commission (CEC) to support a funding program pursuant to this purpose.

Funding through CalAPP is available to all incorporated cities, counties, or cities and counties to implement an online, automated permitting platform that verifies code compliance and issues permits in real time for a solar energy system.

To meet its clean energy goals, California needs new renewable and storage resources, including rooftop solar and storage projects. Per the 2021 Senate Bill 100 Joint Agency Report, achieving 100% clean electricity in California requires an acceleration of the development of rooftop solar projects. CalAPP funding is intended to encourage cities and counties to further enhance permitting processes and accelerate processing and turnaround time, particularly regarding plan review. Overall, funding is intended to promote the development of residential solar and solar - plus-storage systems, greatly decreasing approval times, cutting permitting costs for local governments and homeowners, and helping California meet its greenhouse gas emis sion reduction goals through an easier installation process.

June 2022 Page 2 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
B. KEY WORDS/TERMS
Word/Term Definition
Adoption A term for when a new automated permitting platform is fully installed and operational for processing solar permits.

Applicant The entity that submits an application to this solicitation.

Application An applicant’s written response to this solicitation.

Authorized
Representative
Authorized Representative , the person signing the application form who has authority to enter into an agreement with the CEC.

CalAPP California Automated Permit Processing Program
CAM Commission Agreement Manager, the person designated by the CEC to oversee th e performan ce of an agreement resulting from this solicitation and to serve as the main point of contact for the Recipient.

CAO Commission Agreement Officer
CEC State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission or, the California Energy Commission.

Days Days refers to calendar days.

NOPA Notice of Proposed Award, a public notice by the CEC that identifies award recipients.

Platform Online, automated solar permitting platform
Project Manager The person designated by the applicant to oversee the project and to serve as the main point of contact for the CEC.

Project Partner An entity or individual that contributes financially or otherwise to the project (e.g ., match funding, provision of a test, demonstration or deployment site), and does not receive CEC funds.

Recipient An entity receiving an award under this solicitation.

Solicitation This entire document, including all attachments, exhibits, any addendum and written notices, and questions and answers (“solicitation” may be used interchangeably with “Grant Funding Opportunity”).

State State of California

C. PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK
The applicant may apply for grant funding through CalAPP . Awarded applicants, in consultation with the local fire department, district, or authority, shall implement an online, automated solar permitting platform (platform), such as SolarAPP+. SolarAPP+ is a web-based portal, developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, that automates project plan review and produces code-compliant approvals to support building departments in quickly issuing permits for residential solar energy system installations. Attachment 1, the Grant Application Form, is the scope of work.

If choosing to adopt a tool other than SolarAPP+ , the CEC will verify that it meets the following requirements:

June 2022 Page 3 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program

1. The platform verifies code compliance and issues permits in real time to a licensed contractor for a solar energy system, or an energy storage system paired with a solar energy system, that is no larger than 38.4 kilowatts alternating current nameplate rating.

2. The platform is consistent with the system parameters and configurations of SolarAPP+ as described in D.6, the Verification section of this solicitation manual.

D. FUNDING

1. Amount Available and Minimum/Maximum Funding Amounts There is a minimum of $19,000,000 available for grants awarded under this solicitation.

Funding levels vary based on population size of the applicant’s jurisdiction, from a minimum of $40,000 to a maximum of $100,000 per awarded applicant. Funding amounts are the maximum that can be invoiced by the awardee to the CEC. The CEC will issue payment only for eligible costs supported by required documentation.

Applicant Population Maximum Funding Award Amount
Less Than 50,000 $40,000
50,000 to 99,999 $60,000
100,000 to 200,000 $80,000
Greater Than 200,000 $100,000

2. Population Determination
The maximum funding award amount is determined by the latest population estimates as of January 1, 2021, or sooner and provisional population estimates as of January 1, 2022, provided by the State of California Department of Finance. Population estimates for each city and county can be accessed at https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/ .

County applicants shall NOT include the population of each city within that county for the purpose of identifying a corresponding award amount since each city can apply individually. A county’s population for purposes of this GFO is considered the population outside of incorporated cities within the county’s borders.

3. Statutory Funding Deadlines
Funding through CalAPP is available for encumbrance (funding reservation) until June 30, 2023, and available for liquidation until June 30, 2027. However, due to administrative deadlines, Recipients will have to complete activities, including final invoicing before the liquidation date. Deadlines to submit an application and complete funded activities are identified in Section E below.

4. Budget Costs
Allowable Costs only include reasonable amounts and rates for the following:
• Ongoing staff labor costs associated directly with the adoption, and maintenance of a qualifying online, automated permitting platform, including:
• In-house staff time, including IT resources

June 2022 Page 4 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
• Third-party consultation services
• Ongoing, in-house staff time spent on staff training specific to the platform. • Ongoing costs associated with training installers, developers, and other external parties in the use of the system, including but not limited to:
• Facility rental
• Training printouts and materials
• Essential hardware or equipment necessary to support the adoption of a qualifying platform, which could not otherwise be completed without such hardware or equipment.
• Following the adoption of an online, automated permitting platform, a maximum of three years of maintenance and subscription costs for permit tracking software in support of the adopted permitting platform.
• Maintenance may include a dding support for energy storage paired with solar energy system permitting to an existing platform such as SolarAPP+. • Jurisdictions that have started the process of adopting an automated, online solar permitting platform may still apply for funds to go towards any of the ongoing allowable costs in this list in order to complete their full adoption.

Unallowable Costs include:
• Software not related to the adoption of a qualifying online, automated permitting platform.
• Any costs incurred or activities conducted prior to entering into a grant agreement with the Energy Commission or incurred after the grant agreement has ended. • Typically excluded items such as food and beverages.
• Fines and penalties.
• Advertising costs.
• Permit processing fees charged by operator of an online platform to the user. • All other costs not identified as allowable.
• Unreasonable amounts or rates.

5. Invoicing and Payment
• Payment is issued as reimbursement for eligible costs. • CAM will provide template invoice spreadsheet to Recipient. • If invoicing for in-house staff time, the template invoice spreadsheet must identify the employee’s name, hours worked, and billing rate to be included as a reimbursable expense.
• The first invoice must follow the successful adoption of a qualifying solar permitting platform and will be verified by CEC staff prior to payment approval. Following the first invoice after successful adoption, recipients may invoice as frequently as once per month during the grant agreement for post- adoption activities allowed under

June 2022 Page 5 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
section I.D.4. To avoid processing and workload delays, CEC staff highly encourage a frequency of no more than quarterly.
• Reimbursement is for:
 Paid Costs . Paid costs are expenses which the Recipient has already made payment.
o For invoicing, Recipient must submit paid invoices/receipts, or other supporting documentation for line-item expenses over $500. o For expenses under $500, Recipients will have to retain documentation in case it is requested by CEC staff, such as part of an audit.

6. Verification
The recipient shall submit the first invoice to the CEC following successful adoption of a qualifying permitting platform . The applicant will indicate on the invoice form that the platform has been fully adopted. CEC staff will verify success ful adoption of a platform prior to approving payment of an invoice. The applicant agrees to assist CEC staff with verification, which may include:
• Verifying adoption of SolarAPP+ with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) or other authorized collaborating partner.
• Declaration and attestation of completed grant requirements. • Written report, including screenshots, if the platform is not SolarAPP+. • An online virtual meeting that includes screen-sharing a live demonstration of the platform and answering CEC staff questions.
• In-person site visit to demonstrate an in-house platform to CEC staff. • Pictures, system overviews, and other items requested by CEC staff.

Applicants choosing to adopt a permitting tool other than SolarAPP+ will be required to attest to minimum capabilities supported by the tool. Applicants must adopt a qualifying tool that:
• Performs an automated plan review for residential solar energy systems that completes automatic code compliance checks based on user inputs (such as a contractor), thereby enabling or otherwise issuing permits instantly when the project is confirmed as code compliant, without the need for human review. • Supports online, immediate fee payment once an application is complete, which may include auto-invoicing of permit fee costs.
• Supports immediate generation of a permit job card following payment confirmation.
• Blocks noncompliant applications from receiving a permit. • Either:
o Stand-alone permitting tool; or
o Integrates with current software and inspection platform already in use

June 2022 Page 6 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
CEC staff will review these capabilities during the verification process prior to approving payment of invoices.

7. Reporting
Following adoption and verification of a qualifying platform, the Energy Commission may request, and the Recipient will provide if requested, annual data on the number of permits issued for solar energy systems and a solar energy system paired with an energy storage system including relevant characteristics of those systems, such as system capacity.

E. KEY ACTIVITIES SCHEDULE
Key activities, dates, and times for this solicitation and for agreements resulting from this solicitation are presented below. An addendum will be released if the dates change for activities that appear in bold.

ACTIVITY DATE TIME1
Solicitation Release June 1, 2022
Deadline to Submit Applications May 1, 2023* 11:59 p.m.

Questions and Answers Ongoing
Anticipated Notice of Proposed Award Posting Date Ongoing Anticipated Energy Commission Approval Ongoing
Anticipated Agreement Start Date Ongoing
Anticipated Agreement End Date May 31, 2027
* Because the encumbrance deadline for these funds is June 30, 2023, applicants filed late in the process up to the deadline might not receive funds if the CEC cannot process them in time (e.g., many applicants wait until the last minute and submit all at once). Accordingly, applicants are encouraged to apply as early in the application process as possible.

F. QUESTIONS
During the solicitation process, direct questions to the Commission Agreement Officer (CAO) listed below:

Kevyn Piper, Commission Agreement Officer
California Energy Commission
715 P Street
Sacramento, California, 95814
Telephone: (916) 827-9241
E-mail: [email protected]

The CAO can answer administrative questions directly to applicants. But if questions of a technical nature arise, the CAO may answer by publicly posting questions and answers in order to provide all applicants the information at the same time. If an applicant discovers a conflict, discrepancy, omission, or other error in the solicitation at any time prior t o 5:00 p.m. of the application deadline date, the applicant may notify the CEC in writing via electronic mail and

1 Pacific Standard Time or Pacific Daylight Time, whichever is being observed.

June 2022 Page 7 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
request modification or clarification of the solicitation. The CEC, at its discretion will provide modifications or clarifications by either an addendum to the solicitation or by written notice to all entities that requested the solicitation.

Any verbal communication with a Commission employee or anyone else concerning this solicitation is not binding on the State and will in no way alter a specification, term, or condition of the solicitation. Therefore, all communication should be directed in writing via electronic mail to the assigned CAO.

G. APPLICANTS’ ADMONISHMENT & RESPONSIBILITY
This solicitation manual contains application requirements and instructions. Applicants are responsible for carefully reading the solicitation, asking appropriate questions in a timely manner, ensuring that all solicitation requirements are met, submitting all required responses in a complete manner by the required date and time, and carefully rereading the solicitation before submitting an application. In particular, please carefully read the Application and Evaluation Criteria and Grounds for Rejection in Part IV of this Solicitation Manual and any other resource materials located at:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/california- automated-permit-processing-program-calapp.

Applicants are solely responsible for the cost of developing applications. This cost cannot be charged to the State of California. Applicants should not submit any confidential information in their applications. Applications that include confidential information will be rejected.

All submitted documents will become public records upon its inclusion on the ongoing posting of the Notice of Proposed Awards.

In addition to any other right reserved to it under this solicitation or that it otherwise has, if the CEC determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that if an agreement is not being successfully executed with an applicant in a timely manner, the CEC may cancel a proposed award and award funds to another applicant, if applicable.

H. BACKGROUND
CalAPP is authorized with the passage of Senate Bill 129 (Skinner, Budget Act of 2021). The program is receiving $20 million from the General Fund (up to $1 million available for administrative costs). The funds appropriated shall be used to support a grant program for cities, counties, or cities and counties to establish online solar permitting.

Existing law requires every city, county, or city and county to develop a streamlined permitting process for the installation of small residential rooftop solar energy systems, and to approve administratively applications to install such systems through the issuance of a building permit or similar nondiscretionary permit.

This solicitation addresses solar permitting processes for city and county building departments by providing grant funding to further improve plan review and approval turnaround time, particularly for small residential rooftop solar energy systems. Improving permitting processes to issue permits quickly is intended to promote the development of solar and storage projects and support California’s clean energy goals.

The Energy Commission is aware of proposed legislation that may impact CalAPP. if signed into law. Senate Bill 379, introduced by Senator Wiener in 2021, in its amended version as of May 13, 2022, may require CalAPP awardees to comply with the following provision if this bill is signed into law with existing provisions intact:

June 2022 Page 8 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
• Within one year of implementing an online, automated solar permitting system, a city, county, or city and county shall report annually to the Energy Commission on the number of permits issued for solar energy systems and an energy storage system paired with a solar energy system and the relevant characteristics of those systems.

If this or any other law is enacted that impacts CalAPP, applicants agree to comply with the provisions applicable to them.

June 2022 Page 9 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program

II. Applicant Eligibility Requirements
A. ELIGIBILITY
Strikethrough Disclaimer: Strikethrough language contained within brackets to be removed.

This solicitation is open to all California cities, counties, or cities and counties (including any incorporated towns [ and villages]) that will have costs associated with establishing online solar permitting. Applications from any other entities will not be accepted. Grant applications must be completed and signed by an authorized representative of the applicant’s jurisdiction or will be rejected as indicated in Section IV.E.

B. FIRST-COME, FIRST-SERVED
Applications for grant funding will be processed on a first- come, first-served basis. Qualifying applications for funding are intended to be accessible to any California jurisdiction interested in adopting a qualifying online, automated permitting platform such as SolarAPP+ . Eligible applicants may only receive one award under this solicitation. Multiple applications submitted by the same applicant will be rejected. Staff will continue receiving and processing applications until funding is exhausted or until the application deadline, whichever is first.

Prospective applicants are encouraged to submit a complete application as soon as possible to ensure that funding remains available. Applications will be reviewed on a pass/no pass basis using criteria defined in this solicitation manual.

C. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Each grant agreement resulting from this solicitation will include terms and conditions that set forth the recipient’s rights and responsibilities. By signing the Application Form (Attachment 1), each applicant agrees to enter into an agreement with the CEC to conduct the proposed project according to the terms and conditions that correspond to its organization, without negotiation.

Standard terms and conditions are included as Attachment 2. F ailure to agree to the standard terms and conditions by taking actions such as failing to sign the Application Form or indicating that acceptance is based on modification of the terms will result in rejection of the application.

Applicants must read the terms and conditions carefully. The CEC reserves the right to modify the terms and conditions prior to executing grant agreements.

June 2022 Page 10 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
III. Application Organization and Submission Instructions A. APPLICATION CONTENT
Below is a description of application materials. Completeness in submitting all required information is critical for timely approval and successful implementation.

Application Form (Attachment 1)
This form requests basic information about the applicant and the project. The application includes an original form that includes all requested information. The application must be signed by an authorized representative of the applicant’s organization or will be rejected as indicated in Section IV.E.

The application form collects information that will be used to develop and execute a grant agreement with the CEC. By signing this document, the applicant attests that all information provided is true and correct, and the applicant agrees to the terms of this solicitation.

B. METHOD FOR DELIVERY
The method of delivery for this solicitation is via email to the CalAPP program inbox, [email protected]. This allows applicants to submit their electronic documents to the CEC prior to the date and time specified in this solicitation. Electronic files must be in Microsoft Word XP (.doc format) or PDF formats unless originally provided in the solicitation in another format. Attachments requiring signatures may be electronically signed or scanned and submitted in PDF format with a wet signature. Applications received after the application due date and time may not be processed. Please note the CEC is not responsible for delays in submitting applications. The due date and time are based on when the CEC receives the application. If an applicant sends its application before the due date and time but it for whatever reason is delayed and the CEC does not receive it until after the deadline, the application will be rejected. Please plan accordingly.

Applicants will receive an automated acknowledgement e-mail after submitting their application via email to the CalAPP program inbox. You may contact the Commission Agreement Officer identified in the Questions section of the solicitation for more administrative assistance.

June 2022 Page 11 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
IV. Evaluation and Award Process
A. APPLICATION EVALUATION
Applications for grant funding will be evaluated and processed based on responses to the information requested in this solicitation on a first-come, first-served basis. Information collected in the application form (attachment 1) will be used to reach an award decision on a pass/no pass basis. A passing application for funding is intended to be accessible to any eligible jurisdiction interested in adopting a qualifying online, automated permitting platform. Submitted applications will be assigned to CEC staff and processed in the order they are received. Applications achieving a “no pass” mark will be reviewed by an Evaluation Committee for confirmation of that determination.

Staff will continue accepting and reviewing applications until funding is exhausted or until the application submittal deadline, whichever is first. Eligible applicants may only receive one award under this solicitation. Multiple applications submitted by the same applicant will be rejected.

Prospective applicants are encouraged to submit a complete application as soon as possible to ensure that funding remains available. Applications will be reviewed on a pass/no pass basis using criteria defined in this solicitation manual.

Applications will be evaluated in one stage:

Application Evaluation - Pass/No Pass
Applications will be submitted to the Evaluation Committee for review based on the Application and Evaluation Criteria in Section E of this Part.
• An application must achieve a “pass” in each section of the Application and Evaluation Criteria.
• Clarification Interviews: The Evaluation Committee may conduct optional telephone interviews with applicants during the evaluation process to clarify and/or verify information submitted in the application. However, these interviews may not be used to change or add to the content of the original application. Applicants will not be reimbursed for time spent answering clarifying questions.
• All sections must receive a passing score for the application to be approved for an award.

B. NOTICE OF PROPOSED AWARD AND AGREEMENT DEVELOPMENT

1. Notice of Proposed Award
Applications that achieve a “pass” in the evaluation criteria will proceed. • CEC staff will post a Notice of Proposed Award (NOPA) on an ongoing basis at its discretion that includes: (1) the total funding amount; and (2) the amount of each award. The CEC will post the NOPA on its website, including an email to the program list serve. Proposed awards must be approved by the CEC. • Debriefings: Unsuccessful applicants may request a debriefing after the release of the NOPA by contacting the Commission Agreement Officer listed in Part I via electronic mail. A request for debriefing must be received no later than 30 calendar days after the NOPA is released.

Applications that are rejected or achieve a “no pass” mark may submit a new application according to the requirements outlined in the solicitation.

June 2022 Page 12 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program

2. Agreements
Applications recommended for funding will be developed into a proposed grant agreement to be considered for CEC approval. Recipients may begin the project only after full execution of the grant agreement (i.e., signature by the Recipient and the CEC). • Agreement Development: The Contracts, Grants, and Loans Office will send the Recipient a grant agreement for approval and signature. The agreement will include the applicable terms and c onditions and will incorporate this solicitation and the application by reference. The CEC reserves the right to modify the award documents (including the terms and conditions) prior to executing any agreement. • Failure to Execute an Agreement: If the CEC is unable to successfully execute an agreement with an applicant in a timely manner , it reserves the right to cancel the pending award and use the funds elsewhere, such as to fund the next eligible application.

C. GROUNDS TO REJECT AN APPLICATION OR CANCEL AN AWARD
Applications that do not pass the screening stage will be rejected. In addition, the CEC reserves the right to reject an application and/or to cancel an award for any reason, including any of the following:
• The application contains false or intentionally misleading statements or references that do not support an attribute or condition contended by the applicant. • The application is intended to erroneously and fallaciously mislead the State in any way. • The application does not comply or contains caveats that conflict with the solicitation, and the variation or deviation is material.
• The applicant has included a statement or otherwise indicated that it will not accept the terms and conditions, or that acceptance is based on modifications to the terms and conditions.
• The application contains confidential information or identifies any portion of the application as confidential.

D. MISCELLANEOUS

1. Solicitation Cancellation and Amendment
It is the policy of the CEC not to solicit applications unless there is a bona fide intention to award an agreement. However, if it is in the State’s best interest, the CEC reserves the right, in addition to any other rights it has, to do any of the following:
• Cancel this solicitation;
• Revise the amount of funds available under this solicitation, including maximum funding award amounts;
• Amend this solicitation as needed; and/or
• Reject any or all applications received in response to this solicitation.

If the solicitation is amended, the CEC will post it on the CEC’s website at:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/funding-opportunities/solicitations. The CEC will not reimburse applicants for application development expenses under any circumstances, including cancellation of the solicitation.

2. Modification or Withdrawal of Application

June 2022 Page 13 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
Applicants may withdraw or modify a submitted application before the deadline to submit applications by sending a letter to the Commission Agreement Officer listed in Part I.

Applications cannot be changed after that date and time.

3. Confidentiality
Though the entire evaluation process from receipt of applications up to the posting of the NOPA is confidential, all submitted documents will become publicly available records after the CEC posts applicant’s name on the ongoing NOPA or the solicitation is cancelled.

The CEC will not accept or retain applications that identify any portion as confidential.

4. Solicitation Errors
If an applicant discovers any ambiguity, conflict, discrepancy, omission, or other error in the solicitation, the applicant should immediately notify the CEC of the error in writing and request modification or clarification of the solicitation. The CEC will provide modifications or clarifications by written notice to all entities that requested the solicitation. The CEC will not be responsible for failure to correct errors.

5. Immaterial Defect
The CEC may waive any immaterial defect or deviation contained in an application. The CEC’s waiver will not modify the application or excuse the successful applicant from full compliance with solicitation requirements.

6. Disposition of Applicant’s Documents
Upon the posting of applicant’s name on the ongoing NOPA, its application and related materials submitted in response to this solicitation will become property of the State and publicly available records.

NOTE ABOUT SIGNATURES: The CEC may have waived the requirement for a signature on application materials for this solicitation. If a notice regarding CEC’s waiver of the signature requirement appears here: https://www.energy.ca.gov/funding-opportunities/solicitations, the waiver applies to this solicitation. In the event of a conflict between the notice and any l anguage in this solicitation regarding signatures, the notice will govern.

E. EVALUATION CRITERIA
Proposals will be evaluated based on the Evaluation Criteria below. ALL items in the Evaluation Criteria must pass to be approved for a proposed award.

APPLICATION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA
The Application Form (Attachment 1) must respond to each criterion below. The responses must directly relate to the solicitation requirements and focus as stated in the solicitation.

June 2022 Page 14 GFO-21-402
California Automated Permit Processing (CalAPP)
Program
Evaluation Criteria Pass/No
Pass

1. Administrative Screening
• The application is received by the CEC by the du e date and time specified in the “Key Activities Schedule” in Part I of this solicitation and is received in the required manner (e.g., by e-mail).
• The application form is signed where indicated.

2. Complete Application
• All required sections of the application form are complete, and all information provided is true and correct to the best knowledge of the applicant.
• The applicant selected the correct funding amount according to the corresponding population size.

3. Intention to Adopt Qualifying Platform
• The applicant successfully identifies a qualifying permitting platform to implement as required in Section I.C.
• For platforms other than SolarAPP+, the applicant clearly describes its capabilities and how it meets solicitation requirements.

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-194, Version: 1
COVID-19 Pandemic - Termination of Local Emergency
Approve a Resolution terminating the local emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: March 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT: CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

CITY CLERK

FROM: CHRISTOPHER A. CALLIHAN, CITY ATTORNEY
PATRICIA M. BARAJAS, CITY CLERK

TITLE: TERMINATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY—COVID-19

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion terminating the local emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On March 17, 2020, the Salinas City Council approved Resolution No. 21805 (N.C.S.) declaring the existence of a local emergency resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to that, on March 4, 2020, the Governor of California declared a state of emergency in the State of California and on March 6, 2020, the County of Monterey declared the existence of a local emergency throughout Monterey County due to the spread of COVID-19. On October 17, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom announced that the State of California’s COVID-19 state of emergency would end on February 28, 2023, citing that California has the tools needed to continue fighting COVID-19 when the State of Emergency terminates.

BACKGROUND:

While the COVID -19 pandemic continues to directly affect the safety of persons and property within the City of Salinas, the conditions necessitating the local emergency due to COVID-19 are steadily improving and have sufficiently abated , such that the local emergency is no longer be warranted and may be terminated. The health, safety, and welfare of the residents of Salinas related to the COVID-29 pandemic have improved and there are sufficient resources currently available at the local, state, and federal levels to address any continued threats thereto from COVID-19.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project . The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Page | 2
This Administrative Report aligns with the City Council’s Goals of Public Safety and of Effective and Culturally Responsive Government (City of Salinas Strategic Plan 2022-2025).

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The City Attorney and the City Clerk coordinated on this Report.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to the City of Salinas related to this Report.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution

Page | 3
RESOLUTION NO. _________ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION TERMINATING THE LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATED TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency related to the then continuing spread of COVID-19. Thereafter, the County of Monterey and the City of Salinas declared local emergencies, also related to the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 6, 2020, and March 17, 2020, respectively; and

WHEREAS, on O ctober 17, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom announced that the State of California’s COVID-19 state of emergency would end on February 28, 2023, citing that California has the tools needed to continue fighting COVID-19 when the State of Emergency terminates; and

WHEREAS, with the State of California no longer being in a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic and there being sufficient resources and the local, state, and federal levels to address threats to the public’s health, safety, and welfare from COVID-19.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALINAS that the local emergency first declared by the Salinas City Council on March 17, 2020 (Resolution No. 21805 (N.C.S.)) is hereby terminated.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

______________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:

____________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-208, Version: 1
Assembly Bill 652 -Department of Pesticide Regulation Environmental Justice Committee Consider approving a Resolution authorizing the submittal of a letter from the City Council in support of Assembly Bill 652, to establish an Environmental Justice Committee at the Department of Pesticide Regulation.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: MARCH 21, 2023

DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

FROM: CHRISTOPHER A. CALLIHAN, CITY ATTORNEY

TITLE: ASSEMBLY BILL 652; LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM SALINAS

CITY COUNCIL

RECOMMENDATION MOTION:

A motion approving a Resolution authorizing the City Council to submit a letter in support of Assembly Bill 652.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Council members Rocha and Barrera have requested the City Council consider submitting a letter in support of AB 652 (Lee). AB 652 would create an Environmental Justice Advisory Committee within the Department of Pesticide Regulation. A copy of AB 652 is at tached to this Report for reference. A “Fact Sheet” issued by the Pesticide Action Network North America and the Californians for Pesticide Reform is also attached to this Report for reference.

DISCUSSION:

AB 652, if approved by the legislature and signed by the Governor, would require the Department of Pesticide Regulation, by January 1, 2025, to establish and convene a Department of Pesticide Regulation Environmental Justice Advisory Committee. The Committee would formally review the activities and programs under the jurisdiction of the Department and would provide recommendations to the Department on ways to integrate environmental justice considerations into Department programs , policies, decision making , and activities. The Committee would also provide recommendations on how the Department can improve its communication with communities with the most significant exposure to pesticides. The Committee would hold at least quarterly meetings and periodically post its recommendations on the Department’s website. The Department would also be required to periodically post on its website an update on its efforts to incorporate the Committee’s recommendations. Over fifty organizations, including Safe Ag Safe Schools and the Monterey Bay Central Labor Council, have signed on in support of AB 652.

With Salinas and the Salinas Valley being at the center of the nation’s agriculture industry, many Salinas and Salinas Valley residents work in the agriculture industry and work and live near Page | 2
agricultural areas on which pesticides are used. Although pesticides are intended to harm only target pests, if not used correctly, they can also harm people or the environment. Whether the exposure to pesticides causes harm depends on the amount of exposure, the type of exposure, an individual’s sensitivity, and the toxicity of the pesticide involved.1 If not used properly, pesticides may be potentially toxic to humans: They may induce adverse health effec ts including cancer, effects on reproduction, imm une or nervous systems. 2 With the Department’s mission being “to protect human health and the environment by regulating pesticide sales and use, and by fostering reduced-risk pest management,” the City Counc il’s support of AB 652 would signify the City Council’s support for health and well -being of those individuals working in and living in and around areas where pesticides are used.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The City Council’s approval of a Resolution in support of AB 652 is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (CEQA Guidelines section 15378)
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The City Council’s support of AB 652 is consistent with and supports the City Council’s Goals of Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, Public Safety, and Effective and Culturally Responsive Government.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The City Council’s approval of a Resolution in support of AB 652 would not have an impa ct on the City’s General Fund.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION
The City Attorney’s Office coordinated with the City Clerk and City Council members Rocha and Barrera on this Report.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
AB 652
AB 652 Fact Sheet

1 “What are the Potential Effects of Pesticides?” https://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/dept/comguide/effects_excerpt.pdf 2 “Food Safety: Pesticide Residue.” https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/food-safety- pesticide-residue
Page | 3
RESOLUTION NO. _______________________ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL TO SUBMIT A LETTER IN SUPPORT OF ASSEMBLY BILL 652 (LEE)

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALINAS that the City Council supports the passage of Assembly Bill 652 and the submittal of letters from the City Council to Assembly member Lee and other State agencies, as necessary, expressing the City of Salinas’s support of Assembly Bill 652.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

___________________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST:

________________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 6, 2023
california legislature—2023–24 regular session
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 652
Introduced by Assembly Member Lee
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Bennett, Kalra, and Pellerin) February 9, 2023
An act to add Section 11519 to the F ood and Agricultural Code, relating to the Department of Pesticide Regulation.
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 652, as amended, Lee. Department of Pesticide Re gulation:

Regulation Environmental Justice Advisory Committee.

Existing law, added by the Governor’s Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1991, creates the Department of Pesticide Re gulation and authorizes the Director of Pesticide Re gulation, among other things, to adopt regulations for the issuance and renewal of licenses and certificates for pest control operations. Existing la w requires the director, on or after January 1, 2025, to adopt re gulations for the issuance and rene wal of licenses and certificates for pest control operations for a 3-year period.

This bill would require the department, by July January 1, 2025, to establish and convene an environmental justice advisory committee, a Department of P esticide Regulation Environmental Justice Advisory Committee, as provided, that would formally review the activities and programs under the jurisdiction of the department and that would provide recommendations and identify best practices for improving community protections, compliance with regulations, and enforcement of timelines. to the department on ways to inte grate en vironmental justice considerations into department pr ograms, policies, decisionmaking , and activities, and on how the department can impr ove its

98 communication with communities with the most significant e xposure to pesticides. The bill would require the advisory committee to hold, at a minimum, quarterly meetings and to periodically post on the department’s internet website its recommendations. The bill would also require the department to periodically post on its internet website an update on its ef forts to incorpor ate the advisory committee’ s recommendations.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.​ State-mandated local program: no.​
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
line 1 SECTION 1. Section 11519 is added to the Food and line 2 Agricultural Code, to read:
line 3 11519. (a)  The department, in consultation with the California line 4 Air Resources Board Environmental Justice Advisory Committee, line 5 department shall convene a Department of Pesticide Re gulation line 6 Environmental Justice Advisory Committee by July January 1, line 7 2025.
line 8 (b)  (1)  The advisory committee shall be composed of at least line 9 up to 15 members, and shall include environmental justice leaders, line 10 advocates of socially disadv antaged f armers or ranchers, line 11 representatives of Native American or tribal groups, f armworker line 12 advocates, and representatives from communities in the state with line 13 the most significant e xposure to pesticides, including, b ut not line 14 limited to, community members li ving in both urban and rural line 15 regions with high pesticide use. the following:
line 16 (A)  At least three environmental justice leaders who represent line 17 rural and urban communities with the most significant e xposure line 18 to pesticides.
line 19 (B)  At least three representatives of Native American, tribal, or line 20 indigenous groups.
line 21 (C)  At least two farmworker advocates.
line 22 (D)  Up to two people with expertise in issues affecting socially line 23 disadvantaged farmers or ranchers.
line 24 (E)  Up to two agroecologists or biologists with an environmental line 25 justice background.
line 26 (2)  The advisory committee member s shall r epresent line 27 communities in the central coast, central valley, and southern and line 28 northern California.
98 — 2 — AB 652

line 1 (c)  The department shall appoint the advisory committee line 2 members from nominations recei ved from environmental justice line 3 organizations and community groups. groups through an open, line 4 public pr ocess. After the initial establishment of the advisory line 5 committee, future committee members shall be selected through a line 6 majority vote of existing committee members at a noticed public line 7 meeting of the advisory committee.
line 8 (d)  The advisory committee shall formally review the activities line 9 and programs under the jurisdiction of the department, and shall line 10 provide recommendations and identify best practices for improving line 11 community protections, compliance with re gulations, and line 12 enforcement of timelines and budget. to the department on ways line 13 to integrate environmental justice considerations into department line 14 programs, policies, decisionmaking , and activities, and on how line 15 the department can improve its communication with communities line 16 with the most significant exposure to pesticides. line 17 (e) (1)  The members of the advisory committee may receive a line 18 reasonable per diem allo wance for each day’ s attendance at a line 19 noticed meeting of the advisory committee.
line 20 (2)  The members of the advisory committee may be reimbursed line 21 for actual and necessary tra vel expenses incurred in connection line 22 with their official duties.
line 23 (f)  The advisory committee member s and the department’ s line 24 Assistant Dir ector for En vironmental J ustice and Equity shall line 25 cofacilitate advisory committee meetings. The advisory committee line 26 shall hold, at a minimum, quarterly public meetings, of which three line 27 per year shall be held in communities with high pesticide use . line 28 Members of the advisory committee shall be provided with a remote line 29 call-in option. Langua ge access shall be available to advisory line 30 committee members and the public.
line 31 (g)  The advisory committee shall periodically post, on the line 32 department’s internet website , its r ecommendations for the line 33 department.
line 34 (h)  The department shall periodically post, on its internet line 35 website, an update on its ef forts to incorpor ate the line 36 recommendations of the advisory committee.
line 37 (i)  For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
line 38 (1)  “Advisory committee” means the Department of P esticide line 39 Regulation Environmental Justice Advisory Committee established line 40 pursuant to this section.
98 AB 652 — 3 —

line 1 (2)  “Department” means the Department of P esticide line 2 Regulation.
line 3 (3)  “Socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher” has the same line 4 meaning as defined in Section 512.

O
98 — 4 — AB 652

Background
Pesticides are chemicals used predominantly in
agriculture and also urban environments to kill or
control pests, such as weeds, diseases, insect pests
and other animal pests. The pesticide application
rate on California cropland is about 4.5 times the
national average.2 Exposure to pesticides is linked to
acute poisoning and chronic diseases, such as cancer,
respiratory disease and developmental disorders in
children.3
There are significant racial disparities in exposure to pesticides and associated health impacts. Research by the California Environmental Protection Agency found that
pesticides are one of the top two pollutants in California whose impacts are most correlated with race and
ethnicity.4 Farmworkers and their families in particular experience high rates of exposure to pesticides because of working and living near pesticide applications, lack of protection at work, low quality housing, and lack of access to supplies needed to clean work clothes.5
In California, more than 90% of farmworkers are from
Mexico6 and about 75% are undocumented.7 According
to DPR, the top counties in terms of overall volume
of pesticides applied are the Central V alley counties of Fresno, Kern and T ulare. All three counties are majority Latinx.8
Problem
DPR rarely addresses the concerns of environmental
justice communities in their regulations and
activities, often adopting the agricultural industry’s
recommendations instead.

February 2023
AB 652: Establishing an Environmental
Justice Advisory Committee at the
Department of Pesticide Regulation
By Assemblymember Alex Lee
Summary
The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) is tasked with protecting ecosystem and human health by regulating the sale and application of pesticides and “fostering reduced-risk pest management.”1 However, the Department’s decision-making often functions counter to its health-protective mission.

Despite the known environmental injustices of pesticide exposure in California, DPR is not publicly accountable to the communities most affected by its decisions. The establishment of an Environmental Justice Advisory Committee would increase transparency and accountability to these communities.

For more information, please contact Asha Sharma at [email protected] or Jane Sellen at [email protected].

Pesticide Action Network • 2029 University Ave #200, Berkeley, CA 94704 • Tel (510) 788-9020 • www.panna.org 1 California Department of Pesticide Regulation. (2023). https://www. cdpr.ca.gov/index.htm.
2 Ferguson, R., Dahl, K., & DeLonge, M. (2019). Farmworkers at Risk:

The Growing Dangers of Pesticides and Heat. Union of Concerned Scientists. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/farmworkers-at-risk. 3 Ha, S. & Cisneros, R. (2023). Environmental influences on agricultural worker health. UC Merced. https://clc.ucmerced.edu/sites/clc. ucmerced.edu/files/page/documents/environmental_influences_on_ agricultural_worker_health.pdf.
4 Cushing, L., Faust, J., August, L. M., Cendak, R., Wieland, W., & Alexeeff, G. (2015). Racial/ethnic disparities in cumulative environmental health impacts in California: evidence from a statewide environmental justice screening tool (CalEnviroScreen 1.1). American journal of public health, 105(11), 2341-2348.
5 McCauley, L. A., Lasarev, M. R., Higgins, G., Rothlein, J., Muniz, J., Ebbert, C., & Phillips, J. (2001). W ork characteristics and pesticide exposures among migrant agricultural families: a community-based research approach. Environmental health perspectives, 109(5), 533-538. 6 Aguirre International. (2005). The California Farm Labor Force Overview and T rends from the National Agricultural W orkers Survey. https://www.alrb.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/196/2018/05/ CalifFarmLaborForceNA WS.pdf.
7 UC Merced. (2023). Farmworker Health Study. https://clc.ucmerced. edu.672elmp01.blackmesh.com/farmworker-health-study.
8 U .S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/ tularecountycalifornia,kerncountycalifornia,fresnocountycalifornia/ PST045219.
9 Donohue, A & Y eung, B. (2014). California’s pesticide chiefs: Where are they now? Center for Investigative Reporting. https://revealnews. org/article-legacy/californias-pesticide-chiefs-where-are-they-now/. 10 Chase, S. & Wyanta, S. (2021). Syngenta taps Dolcini to lead North American Sustainability, Environmental Affairs. Agripulse. https:// www.agri-pulse.com/articles/16187-dolcini-joins-syngentas- washington-office.

A recent example includes DPR’s proposed regulation
on the fumigant pesticide 1,3-D, the third most-used
pesticide in California and a known carcinogen that has been banned in 34 countries. DPR recently proposed
an exposure limit supported by Dow Chemical, the
manufacturer of 1,3-D, ignoring the level recommended
by state scientists at the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), which is 14 times lower.

At a recent hearing on the proposed regulation, more
than 100 farmworkers and community members urged
DPR to adopt OEHHA’s recommendation rather than
Dow’s, yet DPR continues to defend their proposed
regulation.

There also is a continuous, revolving door between DPR
leadership and the chemical and agribusiness industry,
with many past DPR directors and deputy-directors
leaving their roles to accept jobs with industry.9 For
instance, the last director is now employed by pesticide giant Syngenta.10
Solution: AB 652
There is currently no formalized, public, or consistent way for environmental justice communities to provide
feedback or recommendations to DPR, despite the
fact that they bear the brunt of pesticide-related health impacts. This bill seeks to create an Environmental
Justice Advisory Committee at DPR that would create
more transparency and accountability to environmental
justice communities.

Similar committees exist at other state agencies and
departments, including the California Air Resources
Board’s Environmental Justice Advisory Committee,
the California Department of Food and Agriculture’s
BIPOC Farmer Advisory Committee, and the Strategic
Growth Council’s Agricultural Land Equity T ask
Force. At the federal level, the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council was established to provide
advice and recommendations to the U .S. Environmental
Protection Agency on how to integrate environmental
justice considerations into Agency programs, policies
and activities. There is a critical need for DPR to have a similar body given pesticides’ links to environmental injustice.

The committee would be composed of members from
communities experiencing high pesticide exposure,
tasked with guiding and monitoring the activities
of the Department. Members would be selected
from environmental justice organizations, socially
disadvantaged farmers and ranchers, Native American
and tribal groups, and farmworker advocates. DPR
would conduct formalized reporting to the committee
and would be required to abide by its recommendations.

This would be an important first step in centering
environmental justice in the Department’s activities and decisions.

Notes
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-183, Version: 1
The Salinas Plan Refresh Report
Receive and accept report regarding the Salinas Plan Update.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
_________________________________________________________________________________ DATE: March 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES
FROM: STEVEN S. CARRIGAN, CITY MANAGER
BY: RUSS BRANSON, (RUSS BRANSON CONSULTING)

JIM PIA, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

MARINA HORTA-GALLEGOS, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR
TITLE: THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH REPORT
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive the informational Salinas Plan Refresh report.

DISCUSSION:

The original Salinas Plan (TSP) was a ten-year plan designed to provide the City with a path forward on maintaining a long -term balanced budget while preserving City services and addressing the affordable housing crisis. The Salinas Plan was presented to the City Council by representatives of the National Resource Network, i ncluding Russ Branson, on December 4, 2018. The Salinas Plan represented over a year of work analyzing the City's fiscal situation and housing policies.

As background, in November 2017, Salinas was one of five cities selected nationally by the National Resource Network to perform an analysis to develop and implement multi -year budgetary planning.

The grant provided $300,000 funding for the effort, and the City contributed $100,000. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic effects on the economy and work force, as well as the significant impacts of high inflation on the national and local econ omy, staff retained Russ Branson Consulting in October 2022, to perform a refresh of TSP.

TSP included 32 recommendations. These recommendations covered a wide variety of subject areas, to be studied, worked on, and phased in over a ten -year period. Since its presentation in 2018, City staff has been systematically exploring the recommendations made, in order to determine whether or not each recommendation is the right fit for Salinas and verifying the amount of potential savings from such actions.

In addition to individual items being considered, staff provides updates to the Finance Subcommittee on a n ongoing basis, and the full City Council receives updates from staff regarding the implementation of the recommendations.

At the time, T SP identified potential solutions in an effort to preserve core City services and address the housing crisis. Utilizing a ten-year budget model, TSP identified the recommendations that, taken together, would eliminate the City's structural budget deficit and establish re sources which can be utilized to address the housing crisis. These recommendations include d plans to reduce current

expenditures, find ways to implement current efforts more efficiently, and identify potential new revenues. Additionally, the TSP included recommendations to increase the supply of affordable housing and decrease the number of residents living in overcrowded and unsafe living conditions.

Recognizing that it's impossible to provide public services without employees, TSP did not recommend any layoffs.

An initial presentation of the draft Salinas Plan Refresh information was given to the Finance Committee on February 7, 2023. Mr. Branson has continued to work with all Departments on refining the document. The ongoing challenges facing the City of Salinas are real and need to be addressed; This Salinas Plan Refresh examines progress to date and, post the COVID -19 Pandemic, identifies where we are on the original recommendations, identifies completed tasks and further identifies and proposes additional needs.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This report aligns with the City Council’s goal of Effective and Culturally Responsive Government. (City of Salinas Strategic Plan 2022-2025)

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Administration coordinated with all Departments and Mr. Branson, in coordinating The Salinas Plan Refresh.

Attachments:

Salinas Plan Refresh

The Salinas Plan
Refresh
Update to 2018 Plan

Date: March 21, 2023 FINAL REPORT

2 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Contents
Chapter 1: Overview................................ ................................ ............................. 5 Purpose of The Salinas Plan Refresh ................................ ................................ ...................... 5 The Salinas Plan Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ . 5 TSP Refresh Recommendation Organization ................................ ................................ ............. 6 Ongoing Recommendations ................................ ................................ ............................... 7 New Recommendations ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 7 Chapter 2: Background ....................................................................................... 8 City Revenues. ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 9 Study Organization ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 12 Chapter 3: The Salinas Plan Status ................................................................... 13 Implementation Impact ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 13 Implementation In-Progress ................................ ................................ ............................. 17 Chapter 4: Evolving Fiscal Challenges ............................................................... 19 10-Year Budget Forecast ................................ ................................ ................................ . 20 Results ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 21 Revenues ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 21 Expenses ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 23 Budget Risks ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 24 Alternative Forecasts ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 26 Alternative Forecast No. 1 ................................ ................................ ............................... 26 Alternative Forecast No. 2 ................................ ................................ ............................... 26 Alternative Forecast No. 3 ................................ ................................ ............................... 27 Conclusion ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 28 Chapter 5: A Future of Trade Offs ................................ ................................ ...... 29 Managing the Organization................................ ................................ .................. 30 Staffing ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 31 Turnover and Vacancies ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 32

3 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
MO-01 (WF01): Healthcare Cost Containment ................................ ................................ ......... 36 MO-02 (WF02): Improve Base Pay on a Cost-Neutral Basis ................................ ............................ 39 MO-03 (WF03): Evaluate the Total Leave Program (old “Eliminate Management and Flex Leave”) ............... 39 MO-04 (WF04): Continue to Address Workers' Compensation Costs ................................ ................. 42 MO-05 (PSO2): Police Civilianization ................................ ................................ ................... 43 MO-06 (OE03): Improve Budget Process and Monitoring ................................ ............................. 44 MO-07 (RM02): Incorporate Multi-Year Financial Planning into All Budgetary Actions ............................. 45 MO-08: Include Leave Accruals and Cash Outs in Current Compensation Study ................................ .... 45 MO-09: Evaluate the Parking Functions Within the City ................................ .............................. 46 MO-10: Evaluate the Impact of Implementing the City’s Coming Compensation Study ............................ 47 City Facilities and Infrastructure ................................ ................................ .......... 47 Current Funding ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 47 Additional Funding Needs ................................ ................................ ............................... 49 CFI-01 (OE05): Prepare a Preventive Maintenance Program for all City Facilities ................................ .... 50 CFI-02 (OE02): Citywide Fleet Strategy ................................ ................................ .................. 52 CFI-03 (MC02) Eliminate General Fund Subsidy of Golf Course Debt Service ................................ ......... 52 CFI-04 (MC03) Eliminate Sherwood Hall Deficits ................................ ................................ ....... 53 CFI-05: Develop an Implementation Approach to Prioritize and Fund the Most Pressing City Needs .............. 53 Investments for a Healthy City ................................ ................................ ............. 54 IHC-01 (NR01) Enact Storm Sewer Utility Fee to Fund Current Transfers of General Fund Revenue to Storm Sewer Operations. ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 55 IHC-02 (NR02): Increase Hotel Tax and Dedicate Funding to Capital Investment. ................................ ... 56 IHC-03 (RM01): Request the Salinas Community to Make the Measure G Sales Tax Permanent. .................. 56 IHC-04 (IN01): Dedicate Savings to Capital Investment ................................ ............................... 57 IHC-05: Evaluate a General Obligation (“GO”) Bond to Fund Key City Projects ................................ ....... 57 Housing & Homelessness ................................ ................................ ..................... 58 Housing ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 58 Homelessness................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 58

4 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
HH-01 (IN04): Convene Stakeholders to Develop an Implementation Plan to Create More than 4,000 New Units of Affordable Housing in the Next Ten Years ................................ ................................ .............. 59 HH-02 (IN05): Establish a Housing Trust Fund with a Dedicated Revenue Stream for Affordable Housing ........ 59 HH-03 (IN06): Develop a Land Strategy to Leverage Private Market Investment to Create up to 2,400 New Units of Affordable Housing. ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 59 HH-04 (IN07): Create Regulations to Address Safety and Health Conditions in Rental and Other Group Housing. 60 HH-05 (NR05): Rental Registry and Inspection Fees ................................ ................................ ... 60 HH-06: Expand SORT Team to Include Public Safety Members ................................ ....................... 60 Appendix A – 2023 “The Salinas Plan Refresh” Recommendations .................... 61 Appendix B -- Other Items of Importance………………………………………………………..63

5 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Chapter 1: Overview

In 2018, the National Resource Network (NRN ), led by Public Financial Management (PFM) conducted a comprehensive study of the financial and organizational issues being experienced by the City of Salinas .

The Study was named “The Salinas Plan” (the “TSP”) and was completed in November 2018. At that time the City was facing a number of issues: budget forecast of a negative net revenue in the General Fund; a housing and homelessness crises ; lack of investment in City buildings, parks, and infrastructure ; and a number of workforce compensation strategies that worked against the City’s goals of competitive pay structures for recruitment and retention. The TSP included 32 recommendations targeted at each of these major issue areas for the City. Since that time , the City has systematically worked at implementing the recommendations from the TSP.

In October 2022, Russ Branson Consulting (RBC) was retained to perform a refresh of the TSP. As discussed later, the “refresh” is an opportunity to review the City’s progress on the original TSP recommendations, update the budget forecast, and recommend additional recommendations based on current economic and operating conditions.

Purpose of The Salinas Plan Refresh
Over the last four years, the City has undergone a number of changes and challenges that have reshaped the City in key ways:
▪ Turnover of key staff, including the City Manager and Finance Director; ▪ The COVID pandemic and resulting impacts on implementation of TSP recommendations; and, ▪ Increased sales and property tax revenue placing the City in a better financial position.

Other aspects of the City remains unchanged, including:
▪ Population has remained static;
▪ Expected new development has been delayed; and,
▪ Total staffing and service levels effectively remain at 2018 levels.

Given the turmoil of the last four years, as well as the progress the City has made on the original plan, the City is seeking a review of the 2018 TSP status, including an evaluation of which recommendations should remain in place and the addition of new recommendations that should be added based on current circumstances.

This “refresh” plan is being completed as an update of the original plan and not a complete re-evaluation of the underlying analysis of the TSP. In this way, the Refresh Plan relies on the work done in the original NRN study. Except where noted, it is determined that the analysis and circumstances of the original TSP remain valid.

The Salinas Plan Summary
The Salinas Plan (“TSP”) included 32 recommendations1, or initiatives, across eight broad categories:

1 Names and descriptions of the categories are from pp. 10 & 11 of The Salinas Plan.

6 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
▪ Risk Mitigation initiatives represent actions the City can take to reduce its exposure to significant budgetary impacts in the future;
▪ Public Safety initiatives provide a path to more efficient, cost -effective Police and Fire services without reducing service levels;
▪ Shared Services initiatives seek to make the most efficient use of shared services and for the City to be properly compensated for services provided on a shared basis; ▪ Managed Competition initiatives focus on areas where the City should explore partnerships to either manage or repurpose City assets;
▪ Operational Efficiencies initiatives change the way the City does business so that services are as efficient and affordable as possible;
▪ Workforce initiatives allow the City to develop a more sustainable compensation package while increasing the City’s long-term competitiveness and ability to recruit and retain employees critical to delivering quality services;
▪ Investment Strategies initiatives focus on investment in the City both to maintain the City’s significant investments in community facilities and infrastructures and to support affordable housing and community development initiatives that will meaningfully begin to tackle the City’s housing and homelessness crisis; and,
▪ New Revenues include provisions for new revenue to support new investment and projected growth.

To date, more than half of the recommendations have either been implemented or are actively being implemented by the City to some extent. A third of the recommendations are not currently being implemented and are recommended to remain in place for City action. Four of the TSP recommendations have attempted implementation and failed or have been rejected by the City as not feasible.

TSP Refresh Recommendation Organization
For the TSP Refresh, recommendations are organized in different groups from the original TSP. This provides a simpler approach and places related recommendations together. The graphic below illustrates the four areas of recommendations in th e Refresh Plan . These areas are: Managing the Organization, Facilities & Infrastructure, Investments for a Healthy City, and Housing & Homelessness.

No. of
Recommendations
Implemented 7
In-Progress 10
Active 11
Rejected 4
Total Recommendations 32
Status of The Salinas Plan Initiatives

7 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023

The numbering of all recommendations is updated to reflect this change; however, t o provide congruity to the original TSP, the original numbering of each ongoing recommendation is shown in parentheses after the new number.

Ongoing Recommendations
The “in-progress” and “active” recommendations from the graph above are detailed in “The Salinas Plan Status” chapter of this report and discussed in more detail in the body of the report below. Twenty-one of the original 32 recommendations are in-progress or remain active for the City. The TSP Refresh affirms these recommendations for continued active implementation.

New Recommendations
New recommendations are provided in each section. The purpose of the new recommendations are to focus the City on the important decisions before it currently and to address issues that have emerged over the last four years. Additionally, the City’s fiscal structure has changed since 2018. No longer is there a looming fiscal crisis, but there will be a crisis in priority setting to meet the total fiscal and capital needs of the City going forward.

Managing the
Organization
Facilities &
Infrastructure
Housing &
Homelessness
Investements
for a Healthy
City

8 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Chapter 2: Background
Many of the factors cited in the TSP – low income, high unemployment, and poverty – remain issues in the City. These are important factors as they each speak to the challenges the City faces in both raising revenues for City services and the amount of City services that many residents need.

Economic Factors . In h ousehold and per capita income, the City is near the bottom compared to neighboring cities. These reduced income levels point to lower ability to purchase housing or to pay for services than in higher income cities. This could also affect sales taxes that have an outsized impact on City revenues.

Unemployment and poverty rates in Salinas are among the highest of neighboring cities. Taken together, these economic factors indicate that the City of Salinas needs to provide not only typical City services (e.g., police, fire, public works) but also needs to focus on services to portions of the community that have resource challenges (e.g. , recreation services, community centers, etc.). This puts a strain on City resources for services that often get cut first under fiscal distress.

$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
Household Income
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
Per Capita Income
5-Year Census ACS Estimates, 2022

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%
Unemployment Rate

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%
Poverty Rate
5-Year Census American
Community Survey (ACS) Estimates,
2019
5-Year Census ACS Estimates, 2020
Employment Development
Department (EDD), December
2022

9 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
City Revenues. A key component of the City’s ability to provide municipal services and continue investing in the broad range of facilities and infrastructure required for any City are its General Government revenues. These revenues include the General Fund, Measure E, and Measure G.2 Since Fiscal Year (FY) 17, the City has seen a significant increase in property taxes (4.8% compounded annual growth rate or “CAGR”), sales taxes (5.6% CAGR) and Other3 revenues (6.7% CAGR).

Much of the sales tax increase occurred during the pandemic. This happened in many jurisdictions statewide, and begs the question of whether this trend will continue or if a reduction could occur as we exit the pandemic restraints. The budget forecast assumes a drop in taxable sales in FY24 and slow growth for the next few years thereafter.

Additionally, while always a high share of total revenue, the City’s sales tax has grown to comprises 62% of total tax revenues.4 This by itself is an indication of potential volatility in City revenues. While the City has experienced solid growth in last few years, future years could bring a decline in sales taxes, particularly if a recession or other economic disruption occurs.

2 Measures E and G were approved by voters as general taxes (i.e., general fund revenues) . The City has chosen to track the expenses related to these revenues separately; however, these are not special-purpose or restricted revenue sources.
3 Other revenues include revenue from other agencies, fines and fees, interest, and rental income. 4 Taxes themselves comprised 85% of total General Government revenues.

Property Taxes
Sales Tax
Utility Taxes
Other Taxes
Franchise Fees
Charges for Service
Transfers
Other
0 20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
180,000,000
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
City of Salinas General Government Revenues
Actual FY17-FY22

10 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
The FY23 distribution of General Government revenues is shown in the chart below. Sales and property taxes collectively account for 73 percent of total revenue – a significant majority – with utility taxes, franchise fees, and all other revenues (taxes, fees, fines and penalties, transfers, charges for service, etc.) accounting for just 27 percent of total revenues.

The increases in sales and property taxes pushed the total General Government revenues beyond the expectations of the 2018 TSP forecast. The following two graphs compare the TSP and R efresh budget forecasts for revenue and expenses. The revenue comparison shows that actual revenue growth far outpaced the 2018 forecast though FY28 (the period of overlapping forecasts).

The expense forecast on the other hand was much closer between the TSP and Refresh forecasts. This underscores that fact that expenses for the City can be controlled much more than revenues. While the City has outperformed the previous forecast, the future is unknown . With the City’s reliance on sales taxes, negative economic volatility will likely impact the City a t some point in the next ten years. This issue will be discussed further in the Evolving Fiscal Challenges chapter.

Property Taxes
21%
Sales Tax
52%
Utility Taxes
7%
Other Taxes
5%
Franchise Fees
6%
Charges for
Service
3%
Transfers
2%
Other
4%
General Government Revenues -- FY23
($167 Million)

11 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023

$0
$20,000,000
$40,000,000
$60,000,000
$80,000,000
$100,000,000
$120,000,000
$140,000,000
$160,000,000
$180,000,000
$200,000,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28
Comparison of The Salinas Plan Revenue Forecast
With Updated Forecast—Governmental Funds
Current Forecast Revenue TSP Forecast Revenue
Past Future
$0
$20,000,000
$40,000,000
$60,000,000
$80,000,000
$100,000,000
$120,000,000
$140,000,000
$160,000,000
$180,000,000
$200,000,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28
Comparison of The Salinas Plan Expense Forecast
With TSP Refresh Actual and Forecast
Current Forecast Expenses TSP Forecast Expenses
Past Future

12 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Study Organization
The Refresh plan in the following chapters starts with a review of the 2018 TSP recommendation status.

Status includes completed, in-progress, still recommended, and not implemented. This is followed by a discussion of evolving fiscal challenges , which includes the 10-year budget forecast. The last chapter undertakes a future of trade offs that the City will need to address to fund its operational and capital needs. This section provides detailed discussion on the continuing recommendations and new Refresh Plan recommendations for each of the four operational categories.

13 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Chapter 3: The Salinas Plan Status

The Salinas Plan was completed in November 2018 with thirty-two separate recommendations crossing nearly every department in the City. City staff took a proactive approach to tracking and working toward implementation of the recommendations. Over the last four years, the City has hired a new City Manager and new Finance Director; however, a focus on The Salinas Plan implementation has been maintained.

During this period, the following overall progress has been made:
▪ Seven recommendations have been implemented and are generating savings or creating operating efficiencies;
▪ Ten recommendations are in-progress at different stages of implementation; ▪ Eleven of the recommendations have not been tackled and remain active recommendations from the TSP; and,
▪ Four of the recommendations have either not been implemented or were tried and did not work within the City’s structure. The City will not pursue these recommendations.

The table below provides a brief description of each recommendation and its implementation status. The recommendations are divided into the four categories from above.

Implementation Impact
The recommendations (grouped by the TSP organization headings) that have been implemented to date have been a combination of:
▪ Public Safety : Staffing and overtime reduction and improvement of police department technology. Total salary and overtime cost in FY22 is $1 million less than in FY19 when TSP was completed.
▪ Shared Services: Consolidation of Animal Services with the County. To date, this has not resulted in costs savings; however, a JPA has been formed and the last of the City’s Animal Control employees will transfer in 2023. The City has a new contract with the Monterey County Regional Fire District for a greater recovery of the cost of services. ▪ Operational Efficiency: Moving park maintenance to the Library and Community Services Department ( facility maintenance has remained in Public Works) and the strategic implementation of consultant studies . Library and Community Services has doubled park maintenance staffing; therefore, costs did not go down, but the parks are better maintained and more closely aligned with the Library and Community Services. ▪ Managed Competition and Privatization. Increased fees to reduce downtown parking fund deficits. The parking fund continues to operate at around a$200,000 deficit (funded by the General Fund) and has $2 million in a negative fund balance.

14 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
TSP
Identifier Initiative Notes
Completed
PS01 Staffing and Overtime Reduction
Updated scheduling then revised due to staffing
shortages. Need to get back to revised schedule
once full staffing allows
PS03 Improve Police Department Technology
Strong movement forward on technology in all
areas. The Word Processing unit has been
eliminated and staff reassigned
SS01 Recover Full Cost of Service from Monterey County Regional Fire District Multi-year contract with close approximation to full cost recovery is in place
OE01 Move Facility and Park Maintenance to Library and Community Services Park Maintenance was moved under Library and
Community Services and has been very
successful. Facility maintenance has stayed in
Public Works
SS02 Consolidate Animal Services JPA with County in place. City staff positions will be fully ended in 2023
MC01 Eliminate Downtown Parking Fund Deficits
Fees raised to reduce deficit. New parking
structure with Co. under discussion. GF funding of
deferred maintenance costs a concern
OE04 Strategically Implement Consultant Studies with Action Plans and Savings Targets
The City has been diligent about tracking study
recommendations. This is an ongoing best-
practices recommendation
Implementation In Progress
PS02 Police Civilianization
Additional civilian staff has been added and is
making impact. Need to complete list of sworn
officer duties to see if more movement is possible.

OE02 Citywide Fleet Strategy
The PW department is moving toward a
comprehensive plan and is working on a
combined replacement strategy. This will result
increased funding needs
OE05 Prepare a Preventive Maintenance Program for all City Facilities Asset management program in progress that will
identify deferred maintenance. This remains an
important project identifying future fiscal impacts
WF01 Healthcare Cost Containment
The City has gone from 100% city funding to
between 5% and 20% employee funding. Long-
term goal should be to increase employee cost
sharing

15 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
TSP
Identifier Initiative Notes
WF03 Eliminate Management and Flex Leave
The City has eliminated these leaves, but added
to other leaves. Hard cap on leave accrual and
the total hours that can be cashed out. The
success of this new program will not be known
until March of 2023
WF04 Continue to Address Workers' Compensation Costs, Moving Towards Sound Actuarial Funding
Reserves for actuarial funding have been
prioritized behind other policy reserves.

IN04 Convene Stakeholders to Develop an Implementation Plan to Create More than 4,000 New Units of Affordable Housing in the Next Ten Years Technical advisory committee and all plans come
through CDD. The creation of affordable housing
plan is being incorporated in the City’s updated
Housing Element in 2023
IN06 Develop a Land Strategy to Leverage Private Market Investment to Create up to 2,400 New Units of Affordable Housing
Affordable housing is not a part of the west
development area. CDD has refocused from new
development area to Citywide strategy
IN07 Create Regulations to Address Safety and Health Conditions in Rental and Other Group Housing
Effective regulatory rules require detailed rental
information first. This recommendation is still
awaiting rental registry creation
NR05 Rental Registry and Inspection Fees Rental Registry program is targeted to come before Council in 2023
Not Implemented/Rejected
NR03 Establish a Mello-Roos Special Tax
Not provided for in East area Development
Agreements. Funding from a Mello-Roos has
limited opportunities outside of new development
IN02 Establish a Productivity Bank
The City set aside $500,000 for the Productivity
bank, but the concept did not take hold with
departments and has been abandoned
IN03 Add an Analyst Position that Reports Directly to the City Manager The City Manager believes that the current
constellation of staff is sufficient to meet the CM’s
analytical needs
OE01 Move Facility and Park Maintenance to Library and Community Services Facility maintenance remains under the PW department
Still Recommended
PS04 Evaluate Provision of Advanced Life Support Services City does not believe that AMR service is
sufficient to provide ALS. Master Plan underway
and should review this recommendation in
analysis

16 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
TSP
Identifier Initiative Notes
WF02 Improve Base Pay on a Cost-Neutral Basis
There are still opportunities to combine base pay
with special pays to improve recruitment
opportunities
IN01 Dedicate Savings to Capital Investment The City needs funding for unfunded liabilities, housing trust fund, and capital investment
IN05 Establish a Housing Trust Fund with a Dedicated Revenue Stream for Affordable Housing
Plan to use Housing Element to address. Plan to
ask State for funding with other cities in 2023
NR01 Enact Storm Sewer Utility Fee to Fund Current Transfer of General Fund Revenues to Storm Sewer Fund
The General Fund will transfer $2.6 million to the
Storm Water fund in FY23. A fee for this
important citywide service is still needed
NR02 Increase Hotel Tax and Dedicate Funding that Results to Capital Investment Capital projects are still significantly underfunded
in the City. The City also has room to increase
this tax compared to other nearby cities.

NR04 Use Multiple Sources to Provide Revenue for the Housing Trust Fund The City has not yet established this Fund.

Recommendation included $500,000 per year City
investment along with potential voter-approved
funding.

RM01 Request Voters Make the Measure G Sales Tax Permanent as Soon as Possible, possibly in 2024
Loss of Measure G in 2030 would be catastrophic
for the City. An investigation of bringing an
extension before the voters is being contemplated
for a potential future vote
RM02 Incorporate Multi-Year Financial Planning into All Budgetary Actions This remains a need of the City and will help
contextualize major, long-term Council policy
decisions
OE03 Improve Budget Process and Monitoring
The City maintains significant financial policies
and budget policies; however, little reporting is
done on if these standards are being met
MC02 Eliminate General Fund Subsidy of Golf Course Debt Service With additional debt service in 2020, the City has
a total of $5.8 Million in debt payments due from
FY24 – FY38
MC03 Eliminate Sherwood Hall Deficits
Sherwood Hall continues to be a net cost to the
City. Additionally, deferred maintenance needs
have not been addressed

17 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Implementation In-Progress
Recommendations that are in -progress often have longer -term implementation profiles due to outside factors – labor negotiations, accumulation of capital, or organizational change.

The recommendations under implementation include:

Public Safety: The Police Department has added, or plans to add, a number of civilian position s in the department (PS02). This is a strong move toward the implementation of this recommendation . The department has created C ommunity Service Aide (CSA) positions that have allowed C ommunity Service Officers (CSO) at the front desk to move to the field, have civilianized the Criminalist position, and expanded use of online reporting which is overseen by civilians. There is ongoing progress in this area. A key part of the recommendation was to create a list of duties by sworn officers that could be delegated to civilians, such as C ommunity Service Officers. This allows for a more thorough evaluation of opportunities that may not be visible without a deep dive into duties. With current difficulties recruiting sworn police officers, such action may allow the SPD to augment the workload of sworn officers and improve public safety service delivery to the community through an improved deployment of its workforce.

Operational Efficiencies: Recommendations remain in-progress regarding the City’s fleet and building maintenance. There are varying fleet strategies being completed in different departments with Police fully implemented and Fire requiring 24/7 service to implement . The fleet replacement program should be integrated into a single program in the next year.

Workforce: Three major workforce recommendations have been partially implemented. While full implementation will be difficult for healthcare cost containment (WF01) and reduction in total leaves (WF03), both of these recommendations should continue to be pursued over time. The WF01 recommendation helps the City contain and share costs with employees; however, this must be balanced with total compensation and labor market forces. To date, the City has moved varying percentages of healthcare premiums to employees with its bargaining units. The recommended goal is 20 percent.

Secondly, TSP recommended elimination of management and flex leave (WF03). In addition to elimination, the City has implemented a hard cap on most leave buyouts. This cap is in place this fiscal year and actual savings are yet to be realized. The FY23 budget assumes $1 million in savings relative to the FY22 actual buyout payments. Elimination of these buyouts could be combined with increasing base pay and the reduction of total leaves, which are still high overa ll. This could address two recommendations at once.

Lastly, the City has not added reserves to address expected Workers Compensation (“WC”) payouts. The total funding calculated in the WC actuarial report is over $25 million in reserves needed. The City has $8.8 million in cash set -aside for these liabilities, leaving the net unfunded liability at $16.2 million.

Additionally, staff is seeking assistance to better manage and charge out the WC liabilities and better manage this cost center.5 This remains an active priority for the City ; however, it has lagged behind funding of the City’s base policy reserves.

5 The City just recently revised its reserves policy and has intentionally delayed funding the WC liability until all other reserves could be built up.

18 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Investments: Three investment recommendations are in -progress, but with unknown outcomes.

Development of housing plan with 4,000 new affordable units is being integrated into the City’s Housing Element update, to be completed in 2023 . The City is using its Technical Advisory Committee as plans come through the CDD as the recommended review committee . The CDD will hold public hearings in discussing the draft Housing Element with the community stakeholders.

A related recommendation was to leverage new development to create up to 2,400 new affordable units.

The City did not require the funding or allocation of units in the East A rea Development Agreement ; however, CDD is refocusing this recommendation to a citywide strategy utilizing grant funds and zoning opportunities.

The City has significant issues with health and safety issues in some of its housing stock.

19 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Chapter 4: Evolving Fiscal Challenges

The City of Salinas’ financial position has improved since the completion of The Salinas Plan in 2018. This improvement has resulted in positive net revenue results (total revenues less total expenses) for the last several years. T he previous budget forecast showed negative net revenues in FY20 and beyond. The significant increases in sales and property taxes have be en a primary driver behind the City’s improved financial condition. This has allowed the City to build policy reserve levels while maintaining operational services and funding General Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects.

Beyond higher-than-expected revenues, the improvement is also the result of the City’s active campaign to keep operating expenses low through limited cost-of-living increases, leaving vacancies unfilled, and – in FY23 – eliminating previously frozen positions in the Police Department. The City has also continued to provide limited funding for deferred maintenance of roads, buildings, and other public infrastructure.

The chart below compares the Baseline Budget Forecasts for the original TSP 6 and the current budget forecast for the refresh plan. The negative net revenue starting in FY30 is the result of the potential sunset of Measure G.

Challenges. The drive to create a sustainable budget is challenged with growing pressures in a number of high-cost areas:
▪ Increases in wages, filling staff vacancies, and expanding staff in key under-served areas; ▪ Continued limited funding of deferred maintenance; and, ▪ Funding of long-term liabilities – road maintenance, retiree health, growing pension costs, etc.

The continuing deferred maintenance concerns could result in the need for crisis-funding for failing facilities and infrastructure. These forces will increase operating expenses and threaten the current budget stability. Fortunately, the City has built up its reserves to help buffer sudden surges in costs . If

6 The 2018 budget forecast was for 10-years, ending in FY28, while the current forecast goes out through FY32. (20,000,000)
(10,000,000)
0 10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 Net Reveue Comparisonn
The Salinas Plan vs. TSP Refresh
The Salinas Plan (through FY28) Refresh (through FY32)
Measure G
Sunset

20 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
future budgets tighten, the City will need to balance raising current-year expenses and keeping reserves intact. Reserves allow the City to weather difficult economic times and respond to financial crises in a rational manner. Additionally, reserves for long -term liabilities—retiree health, maintenance, pension, etc.—reduce future growth in annual expenses and provide budget stability. The City is coming upon the sunset of the Measure G transaction and use tax in April of 2030. The Salinas Plan recommended going to the voters by 2024 to approve this tax as a permanent revenue source. Based on current spending needs for the City’s exist ing operating, CIP, and debt service costs from Measure G, the loss of the Measure G revenue will be devasting to the City’s ability to continue current operations and increase investment in City facilities and infrastructure. The City is also expecting a leveling off of pandemic -induced sales tax growth which will impact total revenue growth in the coming years.

The following discussion provides insight into the City’s financial future based on an update of the 10-year budget forecast model and demonstrated fiscal needs of the City. This exercise provides data and insight into the City’s ability to meet all of its fiscal demands and will provide the foundation for ongoing recommendations to pursue increased services to the communities that comprise the City of Salinas. 10-Year Budget Forecast
The budget forecast uses the City’s recent budget history and current budget as the fou ndation for forecasting revenues and expenses over the next 10 years. Budget forecasts are provided for the General Fund and Measures E and G. For purposes of the forecast discussion and the Refresh Plan as a whole, the forecast is presented with all General Government funds (General Fund, Measure E, and Measure G) together. While tracked separately, the Measure E and G revenues are General Fund reve nues.7 Future years are projected based on the following:
▪ Known factors such as CalPERS normal cost percentage and unfunded actuarial liabilities; ▪ Specialized outside consultant forecast (HdL for property and sales tax revenues); ▪ Expected inflation (CPI) for operations/maintenance and medical costs; and, ▪ Negotiated pay raises in current labor agreements and expected increases over the next several years.

The budget forecast is a living document and does not attempt to predict the future, rather the forecast attempts to provide a range of potential budget outcomes that allows staff and the Council to form sound policy responses to future issues in a timely manner. The 2018 TSP provided such recommendations to avoid achieving the forecast negative net revenues8 for several years. This refresh of the TSP provides an update9 of the 10-year budget forecast to revise budget-related recommendations.

7 Measure E and G revenues were approved by the voters as general -purpose revenues. There are no restrictions in use of these sales and transaction taxes. Together, the General Fund and Measure E and G are referred to as “General Government” funds.
8 Net Revenue = Total Revenues less Total Expenses in each fiscal year. 9 Budget forecasts should be updated annually to provide the best policy direction for timely action.

It is highly recommended
that the City take Measure
G to voters in the 2024
General Election and
request elimination of the
Sunset clause

21 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Results
The results of the Baseline forecast are shown in the graph on the following page. The Baseline forecast attempts to project the revenues and expenses for the City’s Governmental Funds10 to continue in a manner similar to recent budget history with no major changes in programs, funding sources, or the economy. Alternative forecasts to the Baseline are used to stress -test the Baseline forecast in its major revenue and expense drivers and to help policy makers understand coming risks to budget sustainability.

Based on the current budget and assumptions for future growth, the City should expect positive net revenue11,12 through FY29. The first three years of this net revenue are small and subject to changing revenue and expense conditions—the City is still in negotiations with most labor unions, and pension costs are likely to rise in FY24 due to recent poor investment performance.

The big drop in net revenue in FY 30 is based on the sunset of Measure G . The negative net revenue assumes that the loss of the revenue does not change the need for the Measure G -funded investments.

If Measure G is not extended, the City will have a significant issue funding operations at current levels. A more detailed discussion of Measure G is provided in A Future of Trade-Offs chapter.

Revenues
The graph at the end of this section provides an overview of growth rate changes in the Baseline forecast.

The graph shows the actual growth in major revenue categories from FY17 to FY23 and for the FY24 to FY32 forecast. For Measure G, the growth rate is shown for FY24 through FY29 (pre-sunset) and FY24 to FY32 (assuming that Measure G sunsets).

10 The general funds include: The General Fund, Measure E, and Measure G funds. While the City tracks Measure E and Measure G separately, these revenues were adopted as General Fund revenue and are not restricted revenues. 11 Net Revenue is defined as total revenue less total expenses. 12 A major driver of the increasing net revenue is a reduction in General Government transfers to capital improvement projects.
($40,000,000)
($30,000,000)
($20,000,000)
($10,000,000)
$0
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32
City of Salinas Baseline
General Government Budget Forecast
General Fund Measure E Measure G

22 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Overall, the forecast assumes that the next 10-years revenue growth will slow compared to the last five years. This is due to expected slowing sales tax growth and stabilization of cannabis revenues. If Measure G sunsets, the total revenue growth for the 10-year forecast will be negative.

Areas where revenues show recovery from the pandemic are in transfers and charges for service. Both of these revenue sources were cut back in the last five years but are expected to return to historical growth levels going forward. The aseline
budget forecast is based on a set
of assumptions that include
current revenue trends, expected
growth by outside experts (e.g.,
HdL13 for sales and property tax
growth), and actual data where
known. Most of the City’s
General Government revenues
come from taxes (86%), franchise
fees (6%), and charges for service
(3%), as shown on the pie chart
on the right.

As previously noted, taxes are
dominated by sales taxes –
including Measures E & G – and
subject to volatility. HdL, the City’s sales tax consultant , expects a slight reduction in sales taxes in FY24 and slow growth thereafter for the next four years. This impacts total revenue growth for the City in the forecast period.

Growth in revenues is shown in the following chart for the six years from FY17 to FY23 and for the budget forecast from FY23 through FY32. This chart also provides the difference in tax growth from FY23 through FY29 to include Measure G through its last full year of collection. Based on the current Measure G approval, this sales tax will sunset on April 1, 2030. This will result in the loss of a projected $38 million in revenue starting in FY30.

The forecast ass umes a slowing in the taxes from 3.3% per year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) through FY23 to a 2.5% CAGR through FY29. If Measure G is not extended, total taxes will drop below current tax levels by nearly $35 million in FY30.

Additionally, a new revenue that started in FY18 are Cannabis Business License fees and taxes. This drove growth through FY23, but these revenues have evened out and will grow with inflation.

Overall, future revenue growth is expected to be 2.6 percent per year – assuming the extension of Measure G – down from the recent 3.7 percent CAGR of the past six years. The forecast is a realistic assessment of future revenues for the City to make current policy decisions. Under this forecast, increases

13 HdL is a third-party consultant for the City that audits sales and property taxes and provide 5 -year forecasts for each of these revenue sources.

Taxes
145,002,984
86%
Franchises
9,535,000 6%
Charges for
Service
4,696,700 3%
Fees & Fines
3,549,500 2%
Transfers
2,625,000 1%
Other
3,067,200 2%
General Government Revenues
By Source FY23

23 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
in revenues can be used to pay for long-term unfunded liabilities, while revenue reductions are not likely to result in major impacts to services that could be extended is a rosier future is assumed.

Expenses
While revenue growth is expected to slow, expense growth is as well. Total Governmental Funds expenses are projected at $165.5 million in
FY23. The major expense is for
personnel costs – salaries,
overtime, and benefits – at 64
percent of total General
Government costs.

Transfers are the second highest
cost category at 19 percent.

Transfers are primarily for capital
projects, debt repayment, and
general liability. Transfers are also
used to support the storm drainage
system ($2.6 million) and EMS
services ($1.5 million).
-2.2%

2.5%

3.2%

0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
-1.4%

2.6%

2.5%

3.7%

1.3%
-2.7%

11.1%
-3.8%

3.5%

3.3%
-6.0% -4.0% -2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
TAXES

FRANCHISES

CHARGES FOR SERVICE

FEES & FINES

TRANSFERS
OTHER
TOTAL
Government Funds Revenue
Compounded Annual Growth Rates
FY17 - FY23 FY23-FY29 FY23 - FY32
Impacts from the pandemic through
FY23, recovery of charges for service
thereafter
Introduction and growth of the
Cannabis Tax
Salaries
53,967,229
33%
Overtime
5,391,800
3%
Benefits
45,842,871
28%
Outside
Services
19,356,496
12%
Other Charges
4,039,013
2%
Supplies and
Capital
5,022,262
3% Transfers
31,884,556
19%
FY23 General Government
Expenses($165.5M)

24 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Outside services is the third largest category at 12 percent of total expenses. This category covers several activities, the largest b eing the 911 system, outside maintenance contracts, and software system contracts.

Combined, these three expense categories comprise 95 percent of the City’s General Governmental expenses.

In terms of the model, total expenses are expected to slow to a lev el that is consistent with long-term inflationary growth. Salaries are expected to grow between 3 to 3.5 percent over the next five years and then fall back to 2.0 percent growth for the last five years of the forecast . Benefits had outsize growth recently due to changes in the CalPERS pension-cost methodology and is calming down as a greater percentage of the workforce is under the PEPRA 14 rules. CalPERS investment losses in the year ending July 2022 will likely increase pension costs by $1 million per year starting in FY24.

Outside service increased over the last five years primarily in recreation services, elections, and a variety of other services.

Budget Risks
The Baseline forecast is constructed on a moderately conservative set of assumptions – neither optimistic nor pessimistic. The Salinas Baseline forecast includes recent growth in property and sales taxes ; however, it does not assu me the same pace of growth as in the pandemic. In any forecast there are

14 PEPRA = Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act
-1.9%

1.6%

1.8%

0.1%

1.7%

2.4%

2.3%

2.3%

8.8%

7.2%

7.2%
-0.6%

5.5%
-0.7%

2.3%

4.7%
-4.0% -2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0%

TRANSFERS

SUPPLIES AND CAPITAL

OUTSIDE SERVICES

OTHER CHARGES

BENEFITS

OVERTIME

SALARIES
TOTAL
Government Funds Expense
Compounded Annual Growth Rates
FY17 - FY23 FY23 - FY32

25 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
budget risks that cannot be fully captured. The following are among the major areas of identified budget risk still present in the Baseline that could impact the ten-year forecast.

Economically Sensitive Revenues
▪ The recent pandemic and talk of a “coming recession” have made the economic issues prescient in our day-to-day thinking about the economy. We know that what we have today can change.

For the City, the reliance on sales taxes in General Government revenues heightens the City’s exposure to economic changes.

Sunset of Measure G
▪ The Measure G sales tax measure was approved to be in place for 15 years, and will run through March of 2030. If not extended by the voters, the sunset of the sales tax will have significant impacts on the City’s General Government revenues.

▪ It is highly recommended that the City ask voters to eliminate the sunset clause in the 2024 general election. The budget -balancing recommendations included in this study are not calibrated to adjust for a loss in the Measure G revenue.

Workforce
▪ Any negotiated wage increase and level/longevity increases would have a significant impact on the cost of services. Each one -percent i ncrease in wages for all employees would result in additional general fund costs of $600,000 to $800,000 per year.

▪ Healthcare inflation could surpass the projected levels of 5.0 percent cost growth.

▪ Actual pension investment returns and overall plan experience will impact state mandated required contributions and increase the City’s pension costs beyond the amounts assumed in the Baseline projection.

▪ Binding arbitration for the Fire union continues to be ultimately controlled by an outside arbitrator rather than the City C ouncil. This makes future cost increases for Fire Department personnel difficult to project. Because this was adopted through an initiative process by the voters of Salinas, binding interest arbitration rights can only be addressed through a new initiative (not initiated by the City). Note: Voters and interest groups may consider this in the future.

Other Expenditures
▪ New service demands and costs could be generated by infrastructure failure and/ or unforeseen factors. For example, the City’s fire stations and community centers are old and require maintenance and repair, City Hall remediation needs, City building safety updgrades.

▪ Transfers and advances to other propriety funds (Storm Sewer, Parking District, and Golf Course Funds) are based on the amount required to balance these funds in the baseline projection.

Additional costs to support these efforts will decrease net revenue available for other needs.

26 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Alternative Forecasts
As indicated above , the Baseline forecast is one view of the City’s fiscal future based on a set of assumptions. However, there are many things that can impact the City’s budget future. The following three forecast alternatives provide different views of the budget forecast based on some key changes in assumptions. These forecasts are provided as samples of how the forecast model can be modified and stressed to prepare for different policy choices or economic changes. (Note: the alternatives show total Government Funds with differentiation between General Fund or Measures E or G.) Alternative Forecast No. 1
Extend Measure G and Carefully Increase Salaries. One of the Refresh plans major recommendations is to put an extension of Measure G to the voters prior to its 2030 sunset. Additionally, this alternative assumes a one percent (1%)) per year increase in salaries and related costs (e.g., pensions) 15. The result of this adjustment in assumptions shows that the General Fund would be slightly negative in F Y25 with increasing positive net revenue thereafter. The overall impact of extending Measure G show up in the out-years of the forecast.

This alternative shows that the Council has some room to look at new investments a couple of years out; however, additional increases in salaries (a combination of raises for current staff or adding new positions) will require use of the sales tax measures to fund.

Alternative Forecast No. 2
Extend Measure G, Carefully Increase Salaries & Fund Capital. The second alternative adds to Alternative No. 1 by increasing City investment in capital projects to 10% of total annual revenues. This is calculated by adding the difference between assumed capital funding in the Baseline forecast and the calculated 10% revenue. Assuming this increase in funding for capital, the City’s total General Government expenses would exceed revenues for the next several years. This indicates that while the City appears to have a

15 Salaries increase includes both wage increases and increases to total staffing. ($5,000,000)
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32
Alternative No. 1 Net Revenue
Extend Measure G & Inc. Salaries + 1%
General Fund

27 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
sustainable budget in the Baseline forecast, it c annot sustain new investment at low levels compared to demonstrated investment needs under Baseline revenue projections.

Alternative Forecast No. 3
Measure G, Salaries, Capital Investment & Tax Increases. The City’s budget—especially revenues—is dynamic and subject to both outside and internal factors. If sales and property taxes grow one percent per year beyond the Baseline Forecast, the City will grow the capacity to fund the Forecast Alternatives No. 1 and No. 2 assumptions over the next three to four years.

($10,000,000)
($5,000,000)
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32
Alternative No. 2 Net Revenue
Alt No. 1. + Fund Capital at 10% of Net Revenue
General Fund
($10,000,000)
($5,000,000)
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32
Alternative No. 3 Net Revenue
Alt No. 2 + Property Tax and Sales Tax Add'l 1% Growth
General Fund

28 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Conclusion
The City needs to continue monitoring its revenue and expense forecast to guide Council on making sound policy decisions on a year-to-year basis. The forecast should provide perspective on the entire range of needs before the City in the coming years.

29 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Chapter 5: A Future of Trade Offs

The City’s financial future at first glance looks solid; however, this is based on current budget practices holding costs down and recent growth in sales and property tax revenues. The City’s current budget results are positive but do not address many funding issues facing the City, including:
▪ Limited growth in staffing (current staffing levels are less than in 2009 at the end of the Great Recession);
▪ Need to keep compensation competitive and keep up with a growing cost of living; ▪ Deferred maintenance of City infrastructure;
▪ Growing cost of repairing the City’s roads;
▪ Costs of preparing for the new growth area – Boronda Road, new fire statio n, surrounding infrastructure to serve new development16;
▪ Impact of homelessness;
▪ Need for expanded affordable housing;
▪ Responding to a changing regulatory environment; and, ▪ Unforeseen increases in employer health care and pension costs The TSP Refresh is organized slightly differently from the original plan . The all recommendations are arranged in the four categories listed below . Each of these categories will include a discussion of major issues currently impacting the City, the TSP recommend ations that are recommended to stay in place in each of these areas, and new or expanded recommendations needed under evolving operating conditions.

16 Cost of services for the new growth area should eventually be covered by tax revenues from growth; however, capital and operating costs will precede this revenue growth.

Managing the
Organization
Facilities &
Infrastructure
Housing &
Homelessness
Investements
for a healthy
City

30 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Like most local agencies, the City of Salinas has more needs for funding than it has available revenues. While increases in revenues have allowed the City to create a solvent fiscal position in recent years, fully funding the fiscal needs for the issues listed above will challenge the City’s revenue sources. This is not a new issue for the City. The challenge now is how to deploy revenues and develop a thoughtful policy response to the variety of issues facing the City. This creates a future of trade-offs that Council will need to weigh to make difficult decisions.

The remainder of this chapter will provide the overview of issues and recommendations – both new and continuing – that the City can use to move forward in a proactive manner. All recommendations have been renumbered for the new organization of the study. The format will be MOxx (Managing the Organization), FIxx (Facilities & Infrastructure), IHCxx (Investments for a Healthy City), and HHxx (Housing & Homelessness). For continuing recommendations the TSP numbering will be included in parentheses next to the new numbers to provide context when comparing to the old plan.

Managing the Organization
The single largest expense category of the City of Salinas is employee wages and benefits, totaling nearly two-thirds of overall General Fund expenditures in the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget. Like most local governments, the City is a labor -intensive organization, requiring trained and service -oriented workers to prevent and investigate crime, to maintain safe and clean streets, to respond to fire emergencies, and to support the many other important functions of municipal government effectively. As a result, it is critical to develop a workforce strategy that recruits, retains, and motivates high quality personnel to fill these roles – and it is no less critical that this strategy be financially sustainable to support both essential services and stable employment.

31 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Staffing
Authorized City staffing has remained in a narrow band over the last several years, as shown in the graph below. At the same time, the City’s population has remained stable as well.

In addition to the ways in which the City has managed its workforce recently, there are emerging needs to add staff in many areas: maintenance, IT, engineering, fire station in new growth area, continuing to expand police department expertise in non -sworn positions, to name a few. On one hand, there is a need for consistent evaluation of where staff is needed and how City’s needs are evolving to service demands.

The Police Department has experienced several changes in staffing since FY17. A number of police positions were frozen for several y ears, and just recently deleted from the authorized FTE list; however, the graph below shows how both sworn and non-sworn positions have shrunk in the last several years.

Neither the TSP or this Refresh Plan had the scope to evaluate police staffing le vels, the department has been responding to reduced funding levels and difficulty in filling police positions being experienced nationwide.

0.0 100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
600.0
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
Authorized FTE
By Department
Police Fire Public Works Community Services CDD Administrative

0.000

50.000
100.000
150.000
200.000
250.000
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
Salinas Police Staffing
FY17 - FY23
Police (Sworn) Police (Adminstrative)

32 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
The static citywide FTE has also resulted in low growth in wages and benefit costs over the last six years.

While this has been good for balancing the budget in the last few years, it has also placed stress on City staff and limited the ability to attract and retain new staff. 17 Turnover and Vacancies
The City has had a consistent level of turnover from FY17 through FY22, averaging 10 percent per year.

Resignations have slightly outpaced retirements by 159 to 133 over this time period. In total, the City has lost 323 employees from all separation events during this time period. As shown in the graph below, the City has lost an average of 54 employees per year for all reasons.

The turnover rate increased in FY22 to nearly 12 percent; however, the previous five years it was under 10 percent. Resignations averaged 4.9 percent per year and retirements 4. 1 percent. This turnover rate for

17 CAGR = Comprehensive Annual Growth Rate.

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%
0 10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
FY17
Actual
FY18
Actual
FY19
Actual
FY20
Actual
FY21
Actual
FY22
Actual
Wage & Benefit Growth
FY17-FY22
Salaries Overtime Wage CAGR (FY17-22) OT CAGR (FY17-FY22) 0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Turnover
Type by Year
Resignation Retirement Dismissal Death Other

33 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
both resignations and retirements does not appear too high; however, the turnover rate must be addressed by an equal hiring rate.

The key question is how quickly the City is able to replace positions lost to turnover. The table below shows the vacancies as of December 2022, less the new positi ons added in the FY23 budget – assumed to not be filled – to arrive at total vacancies from past years’ turnover. Based on average turnover per year by department, most departments show a one to two-year lag in replacing lost positions. CCD is a stand ou t at 3.4 years18, and Fire is fully staffed based on a practice of over-hiring in recent years.

Based on the current authorized 559 FTEs, the City is operating at a more than 15 percent vacancy rate. This creates issues with operations and staff burnout. As discussed elsewhere, the City is in the process of completing a compensation study to address pay inequities to the extent that pay is an issue in filling positions.

18 The work for some of the vacant positions in CDD are being filled by contractors.

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Turnover Rate Per Year
Resignations Retirements
City of Salinas
Vacancies and Added Positions
Category Admin Finance Attorney CDD
Library
Com Svs
Public
Works Fire Police Total
Vacancy (Dec. 2022) 2.00 9.00 2.00 13.00 8.50 22.00 1.00 28.00 85.5 FY23 New Pos. 2.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 0.00 7.00 5.00 -8.00 14.0 Vacant less New Pos. 1 0.0 7.0 1.0 8.0 8.5 15.0 -4.0 36.0 71.5 Accumulated Vac. Yrs. 0.0 2.6 2.0 3.4 1.0 1.4 -0.4 1.7 1.3 1 Excludes positions added or removed in FY23 divided by the average vacancy per year since FY17 In CDD some vacancies are being filled by consultants

34 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023

The 2018 The Salinas Plan was released over four years ago. Since then, much of the economic and employment landscape has changed. The COVID-19 pandemic, trillions in federal stimulus spending, record high inflation, rising interest rates, and the war in Ukraine – to name a few – underscore the economic uncertainty across the nation.

Furthermore, many local government employers – who already faced hiring challenges pre -pandemic – were significantly impacted by the “Great Resignation” in which portions of the population left the workforce or changed employers in large numbers seek ing greater work -life balance, remote work opportunities, and in response to the rising cost of living in certain geographic areas.

As shown in the table below, at the onset of the COVID -19 pandemic, the “quit rate” (also known as the voluntary resignation rate) spiked across the state and local government sector nationally, achieving 205,000 quits in March 2020, a figure that is nearly 30% higher than the average monthly quits over the prior five (5) full calendar years. Importantly, however, the quits continued to be elevated in the latter part of 2021 and into 2022, achieving a peak quit rate of 233,000 in March 2022 even as the US economy was opening, and remained at noticeably higher levels through November 2022 (most recently published data).19 Today, many local government employers are struggling to fill vacancies with qualified applicants, in part, resulting from the challenges posed by the “Great Resignation.”

19 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey -1.0
-0.5

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 Finance Attorney CDD Library Com
Svs
Public
Works
Fire Police
Years Accumulated Vacancies
Vacancies Expressed as Years of Turnover

35 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023

Despite this trend, the job market remains strong as evidenced by the low unemployment rate. As shown in the table below, while there was a significant spike in the unemployment rate due to COVID related shutdowns, the unemployment rate has generally returned to pre-pandemic levels. As of November 2022, the California unemployment rate was 4.0 percent, while the Monterey County unemployment rate was 5.5 percent (which includes the City of Salinas).20

The 2018 Salinas Plan found the City to be in a very strong comparative position for total compensation, even relative to a survey group skewed toward communities with higher housing costs and incomes, and still in a competitive pay position even when looking at base pay alone. However, the City was found to have a "compensation imbalance” such that the make-up of compensation was skewed toward benefits. As

20 State of California, Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information

36 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
mentioned in the 2018 Salinas Plan, overweighting benefits in the total compensation package can create a competitive disadvantage for recruitment and retention. If employee benefit programs are providing adequate benefits, many workers will prioritize salaries when comparing opportunities in the overall labor market. Coupled with high inflation and a tight labor market, this situation can become even more challenging for employers to navigate.

The 2018 Salinas Plan had four key recommendations, which are discussed in more detail below:
▪ Healthcare cost sharing and cost containment;
▪ Restructuring paid leave;
▪ Moving selected pay premiums to base; and,
▪ Continuing to address high workers’ compensation costs.

While the 2018 Salinas Plan recommendations were made under a different economic and employment situation, it is important to remember that these recommendations were designed to cross business cycles and should be viewed from a strategic, long -term perspective. That sa id, it is equally critical for any organization to reassess these recommendations in the context of changing and/or newly developed circumstances.

CONTINUING RECOMMENDATIONS
This section discusses the TSP recommendations that are recommended for the City to continue implementation. This new section of Managing the Workforce combines recommendations from the former TSP Workforce (WF), Operational Efficiencies (OE), Public Safety (PS), and Risk Management (RM). For ease of reference back to the TSP, the original recommendation identifiers are shown in parentheses next to the new recommendation numbers.

MO-01 (WF01): Healthcare Cost Containment
The City participates in the CalPERS health network. CalPERS provides health benefits to 1.4 million public employees, retirees and their dependents. Benefits vary based on location. Annual health plan availability, covered benefits, health premiums and co -payments are determined by the CalPERS Board of Administration21. The table below highlights the progress that the City has made on increasing employee premium cost sharing with its various bargaining units as recommended in the 2018 Salinas Plan.

For most e mployees, the City will pay up to 95 percent of the monthly premiums for the PERS Platinum Plan22 at all coverage levels (employee only, employee + 1 dependent, and employee + 2 dependents). This level is almost unchanged from the original 2018 Salinas Plan when the City paid up to 96 percent of monthly premiums. Importantly, however, the City eliminated flat dollar cost sharing caps for several bargaining groups including AMPS, Confidential, and Department Directors. Flat dollar monthly premium caps still exist

21 CalPERS, Benefit Programs, www.calpers.ca.gov.
22 The PERS Choice Plan was eliminated as a plan offering and was replaced with the PERS Platinum Plan. Some MOUs still reference the PERS Choice Plan, but in practice, the City bases its contr ibutions on the PERS Platinum Plan.

37 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
for several bargaining groups, including SEIU and SMEA, however, the employee caps were increased in the last round of bargaining.

Beginning in 2024, the City will introduce additional monthly premium cost sharing for its Confidential employees, reducing its cost sharing from 95 percent to 80 percent of the PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels. A similar change was made for IAFF represented employees. As of the most recent labor agreement with the IAFF, the City will pay up to 80 percent of the PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels. SPOA represented employees with dependents will see their monthly premium cost share increase as well, although at a more modest level.

Employee Healthcare Premium Cost Sharing by Bargaining Unit Unit Employer / Employee Healthcare Premium Cost Sharing % of Monthly Premiums
AMPS City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

CONF MGMT
City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

Beginning January 2024 City pays up to 80% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

CONF MISC
City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

Beginning January 2024 City pays up to 80% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

DIRECTORS
City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

Beginning January 2024 City pays up to 80% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels
FSA City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels IAFF City pays up to 80% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels PMA City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

38 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Unit Employer / Employee Healthcare Premium Cost Sharing % of Monthly Premium
SPOA
City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

Beginning January 2024 City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan for EE only,

94.5% for EE +1, and 94% of EE + 2

SEIU BC
City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

Employee pays maximum of $47/mo for EE only; $90/mo for EE + 1; $120/mo for EE + 2

SEIU CS
City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

Employee pays maximum of $47/mo for EE only; $90/mo for EE + 1; $120/mo for EE + 2
SMEA
City pays up to 95% of PERS Platinum Plan at all coverage levels

Employee pays maximum of $47/mo for EE only; $90/mo for EE + 1; $120/mo for EE + 2

As shown in the table below, under the City’s 95 percent cost sharing arrangement with non -sworn bargaining units and the SPOA, most employees have either a no-cost or very low-cost medical plan available to them. A majority of SPOA represented employees participate in the Peace Officers Research Association of California Plan (PORAC), which requires small employee premium cost sharing. So, while, the City has made progress in introducing employee premium cost sharing, the current structure will do little to control future growth in the City’s cost of providing medical benefits. As premiums increase due to trends in the healthcare marketplace, the City’s cost will increase proportionately.

CalPERS Region 1 2023 Monthly Premiums & 80%/95% Employer Cost Sharing 2023 Health Plans Subscriber Subscriber & 1
Dependent
Subscriber & 2+
Dependents
City Contribution @ 80% of PERS Platinum (IAFF) $960.10 $1,920.19 $2,496.25 City Contribution @ 95% of PERS Platinum (All others) $1,140.11 $2,280.23 $2,964.29 REGION 1 CALPERS PLANS23
Anthem Blue Cross Del Norte EPO $1,200.12 $2,400.24 $3,120.31 Anthem Blue Cross Select HMO $1,128.83 $2,257.66 $2,934.96 Anthem Blue Cross Traditional HMO $1,210.71 $2,421.42 $3,147.85 Blue Shield Access+ HMO $1,035.21 $2,070.42 $2,691.55
Blue Shield Access+ EPO $1,035.21 $2,070.42 $2,691.55
Blue Shield Trio HMO $888.94 $1,777.88 $2,311.24
Health Net SmartCare $1,174.50 $2,349.00 $3,053.70
Kaiser Permanente $913.74 $1,827.48 $2,375.72

23 These are CalPERS Region 1 plan offerings and monthly premiums. Importantly, not all of these plans have networks available in Monterey County.

39 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
2023 Health Plans Subscriber Subscriber & 1
Dependent
Subscriber & 2+
Dependents

Subscriber Subscriber & 1
Dependent
Subscriber & 2+
Dependents
Peace Officers Research Assoc of CA2023 Health Plans $825.00 $1,875.00 $2,300.00 PERS Gold $825.61 $1,651.22 $2,146.59
PERS Platinum $1,200.12 $2,400.24 $3,120.31
UnitedHealthcare SignatureValue Alliance $1,044.07 $2,088.14 $2,714.58 Western Health Advantage HMO $760.17 $1,520.34 $1,976.44 Current Status: To improve the long-term financial stability of the City’s health benefit program, the City may wish to negotiate a flat dollar monthly maximum contribution that the City will make on behalf of employees at each coverage level. Future increases in the City’s contribution amounts would be subject to negotiations, but a status qu o contract would not automatically increase the City’s contribution toward health benefits. Under the current structure where the City’s contribution is linked to a percentage of monthly premiums, as monthly premiums increase so does the City’s expense. There are numerous ways that these flat contributions could be structured, including options that target a “no cost share” option for employee only coverage with greater employee cost sharing for those employees that enroll dependents.

At the same time, it should be noted that inflationary pressures are running at a 40 -year high, and labor demands for commensurate wage increases are becoming more common, even if the level of wage increase sought is not financially feasible for many public employers. Tryi ng to enact healthcare cost containment that pushes more costs to employees, may only add to the pressure for more substantial wage increases, which have associated roll -up costs (payroll taxes, PERS, etc.) that health benefits do not. A balanced, strategic approach is needed to address these ongoing issues over the long-term.

MO-02 (WF02): Improve Base Pay on a Cost-Neutral Basis
The 2018 Salinas Plan recommended that the City broadly restructure its approach to compensation in order to improve prospectiv e improvements in base pay. These recommendations were intended to be cost neutral, but would allow the City to re-direct compensation enhancements to the most transparent aspect of compensation, namely base salary. In turn, the improved base salary would help with the recruitment of prospective employees. To the extent possible, the City should continue to pursue this recommendation from the TSP.

MO-03 (WF03): Evaluate the Total Leave Program (old “Eliminate Management and Flex Leave”) The 2018 Salinas Plan recommended that the City bargain to eliminate management leave and flex leave, and that cash-outs of annual leave be reduced. As shown at a high -level in the table below, the City has made progress toward this objective.

Annual Leave, Flex Leave, & Management Leave
Annual Leave Flex Leave Management Leave
AMPS Increased Accrual Eliminated
CONF MGMT Increased Accrual Eliminated
CONF MISC Increased Accrual Eliminated
DIRECTORS Increased Accrual Eliminated
FSA  Eliminated
IAFF Decreased Accrual

40 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Annual Leave Flex Leave Management Leave
PMA  Eliminated
SPOA  Eliminated
SEIU BC Increased Accrual Eliminated
SEIU CS Increased Accrual Eliminated
SMEA Increased Accrual Eliminated

For the non-safety bargaining units, the City agreed to increase annual leave accruals at the same time that management or flex leave was eliminated. However, these changes still resulted in a net reduction in the total leave hours available to employees in the aggregate.

For example, as shown in the table below, in the current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Association of Management Personnel of Salinas (AMPS) covering January 1, 2020 through June 30, 2023, effective January 1, 2021, the Cit y and AMPS agreed to eliminate 130 hours (16.25 days) of management leave. At the same time the parties agreed to increase annual leave accruals by approximately nine days, resulting a net reduction in the leave received by AMPS represented employees by a pproximately seven days per year.

Pre-12/31/2020 Accruals & Post-1/1/2021 Accruals for AMPS Represented Employees Pre-December 31, 2020 Leave Accruals
Years of Service Annual Leave
(Days) Management Leave (Days) Total Annual Leave +
Management Leave (Days)
1-5 22 16 38
6-10 27 16 43
11-15 29 16 45
16-17 30 16 46
18-19 31 16 47
20-24 32 16 48
25+ 33 16 49

Effective January 1, 2021 Leave Accruals
Years of Service Annual Leave
(Days) Management Leave (Days) Total Annual Leave +
Management Leave (Days)
1-5 31 0 31
6-10 36 0 36
11-15 38 0 38
16-17 39 0 39
18-19 40 0 40
20-24 41 0 41
25+ 42 0 42

Under previous MOUs, the City’s annual leave accruals were capped at 600 hours for most bargaining units (higher for IAFF) – meaning employees could “bank” up to 600 hours and carry that from year -to-year.

Accruals exceeding these caps were automatically paid out in cash once per year at the employees straight-

41 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
time hourly rate of pay. The table below shows the pre-December 31, 2021 and post-January 1, 2022 accrual caps for each bargaining unit.

For example, the City and AMPS agreed to increase the maximum annual leave accrual cap that an employee can “bank” from 600 hours to 672 hours. Effective January 2022, once an employee reaches a bank of 672 annual leave hours, they are no longer allowed to accrue annual leave until the balance is brought below that threshold. Furthermore, AMPS represented employees are only allowed to “cash out between 80 to 100 hours of annual leave each year, essentially creating a hard cap on both accrual balances and cash out amounts.

While the City made progress to implement hard caps on annual leave accruals and establish limitations on cash out amounts for non-safety bargaining units, the automatic cash out of leave accruals in excess of the cap still remains for the City’s public safety units, including FSA, IAFF, PMA, and SPOA.

Current Status: It is strongly recommended that the City continue to work toward enacting ha rd accrual caps and cash out limits with these safety groups.

Annual Leave Accrual Caps
Pre-December 31, 2021 Post-January 1, 2022
Annual Leave Accrual Cap Annual Leave Accrual Cap
AMPS 600 hours 672 hours/hard cap
CONF MGMT 600 hours 732 hours/hard cap
CONF MISC 600 hours 692 hours/hard cap
DIRECTORS 600 hours 768 hours/hard cap
FSA 898/56 hour sched; 678/40 hour sched No Change
IAFF 898/56 hour sched; 678/40 hour sched No Change
PMA 600 hours No Change
SPOA 600 hours No Change
SEIU BC 600 hours 692 hours/hard cap
SEIU CS 600 hours 692 hours/hard cap
SMEA 600 hours 736 hours/hard cap

It is further recommended that the City conduct a comprehensive benchmarking study of its leave program and seek to align its leave benefits with that of other public employers in the labor market.

The study should look at all leave available to employees, regardless of type, including vacatio n/annual, personal, management/executive, holiday, and sick leave at each year of service. In addition to comparing accrual levels at various tenure perspectives, the study should look at the amounts that other agencies allow employees to “bank” (i.e., accrual caps) and cash-out limits. The amount that employees in Salinas can “bank” seems particularly high relative to public sector norms – even before the January 2022 enhancements are considered – which are generally limited to about half of what is avail able to Salinas represented employees. For example, employees in Monterey City represented by the General Employees of Monterey, Local 792, are limited to vacation accruals of 320 hours. Santa Cruz City employees represented by SEIU are limited to vacation accruals that are two-times an employees’ annual rate of accrual, which equates to 320 hours at the maximum annual vacation accrual.

42 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023

MO-04 (WF04): Continue to Address Workers' Compensation Costs The 2018 TSP recommended a number of reforms to the City’s workers’ compensation program to help control costs and meet long-term funding needs. Since the 2018 Salinas Plan was released, the responsibility of the workers’ compensation program was moved from the City Attorney’s Department to the Human Resources Department and an additional FTE was authorized to oversee the program.

As of the June 30, 2021 (most recently published financial audit), the City reported a net liability of $26.66 million on its statement of net position, of whic h $1.78 million was considered general long -term debt.24 The City uses an Internal Service Fund (ISF) to allocate costs and track expenses related to its workers’ compensation program. As of June 30, 2021, the workers’ compensation ISF had a negative net position of $(93,810), meaning that assets (including cash) were not sufficient to cover liabilities.

The City currently funds its workers’ compensation program on a “pay -as-you” go basis, meaning it structures the ISF to recover costs sufficient to mee t expected annual claim payments, program administrative costs (i.e., personnel, legal, etc.), and excess insurance premiums. The City does not fund its workers’ compensation program on an actuarial basis. 25 The City’s workers’ compensation actuary, Bickmore Actuarial, recommends that workers’ compensation programs be funded at a confidence internal from 75 percent to 85 percent, with an 80 percent target being the mid -point of the upper - and lower- bound range. Because workers’ compensation claims can ha ve a long -tail, meaning payments for claims incurred today can go out many years into the future, it is strongly recommended – though not required – for employers to set aside assets sufficient to meet future expected claim costs. The City currently does not have any assets set aside for these expected future workers’ compensation payments, resulting in a net liability. Ultimately, as these claim costs become payable, they can rapidly increase workers’ compensation expenses, and – in the absence of available resources – become the responsibility of the General Fund. The City should seek to fund its workers’ compensation claims on an actuarial basis . Achieving fully recommended actuarial funding 26 will not be achieved in the near -term without significant impacts to service levels. As such, the City should develop a plan to achieve full actuarial funding over a reasonable multi-year period.

The TSP recommendation indicated that the City should move to practices that lower annual premiums through training, temporary accommodation and better WC response as well as move to funding actuarial liabilities at the 75% confidence level. The City has an “expected” discounted claims liability of $25.3 million in FY22 with no funding set aside, as shown in the table on the following page.27 This amount increases to $28.3 million if funded at the 75% confidence level. The City has set aside $8.8 million dollars for the liability, reducing the current set-aside needed to fund the current liability to $16.5 million

24 June 30, 2021, City of Salinas, Annual Comprehensive Financial Report 25 The contracts with an outside party to determine the present value of future payments. For WC, the consultant determines an amount that the City should have in reserve for expected future payments. This is the funding of the “actuarial basis.”
2626 The City hires outside consultants to calculate “actuarial funding” requirements. Generally, this refers to the present value of future payments net of current funding or investments. 27 Page 3 of Bickmore Actuarial, “Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Workers’ Compensation Program,” October 19, 2022.

43 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023

This lack of funding puts the City at risk for having to raid other reserves to pay these liabilities in future years. The City should make moves to begin sound actuarial funding by funding a reserve for expected loss and liability claims as at a minimum.

In addition to funding the workers’ compensation program on an actuarial basis, the team recommends that the City explore, through negotiations, the potential cost savings from a workers’ compensation carve out for its public safety groups . Under California law, "carve -out" programs allow employers and unions to create their own alternatives for workers' compensation benefit delivery and dispute resolution under a collective bargaining agreement. Carve -outs can result in cost -savings over the long -term by reducing the administrative and legal costs associated with workers’ compensation claims adjudication by placing decision making authority in the hands of an ombudsman. Some California public employers have also shared the program cost -savings with bargaining unit members as an incentive for keeping program costs low.

MO-05 (PSO2): Police Civilianization
Based on the CPSM 28 study from August of 2018 , the TSP echoed the recommendation to convert four vacant positions to Community Service Officers (CSOs). This results in lower cost and shifts non-patrol work to non-sworn personnel. The Police Department is in the process of expanding civilianization of staff. Some of the civilianization has included:
▪ Pursuing a CalVIP grant for civilian Community Engagement Officer and Youth Diversion ▪ Disbanding the Word Processing Unit and reassigning employees to Community Service A ide positions that allow CSOs to be in the field more
▪ Civilianization of the Criminalist position
▪ Expanded Crime Analysts to assist in investigations
▪ Online reporting overseen by civilian employee
Even with the significant efforts made to date, t he department can still benefit from an ongoing effort to list all sworn officer duties to see where more duties can be civilianized.

28 Center for Public Safety Management (CPSM) study, August 7, 2018.

44 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
While total crimes dropped between 2017 to 2021, the
department reports that homeless-related calls are
taking more and more of the department’s time. The
use of civilianization remains an important response to the City’s service demands and real -world issues with
deploying sworn officers for all Police calls.

Current Status : The Police Department has made
significant strides in expanding civilian positions in the department. As sworn officers’ duties change with the
demands of the City, listing current sworn-officer tasks to evaluate what can, or should, be moved to civilian
positions is an important ongoing process.

MO-06 (OE03): Improve Budget Process and Monitoring
Several recommendations from the TSP focused on activities related to the Finance Department. Since the TSP completion the Finance Department has experienced high vacancies, limiting movement in these areas.

Currently there are seven vacant finance/IT positions. In addition, the Finance Director position turned over, creating a lag in implementation. Each of following TSP recommendations is included as recommendations in this Refresh Plan.
▪ Financial Policy monitoring and reporting. The City has a number of valid and important financial policies covering reserves, the budget, investments, etc. However, due to key staff vacancies, there is no consistent monitoring on how the City is doing fulfilling these policy requirements. It is recommended that the City provide an annual monitoring report on major financial policy elements once new staff have been hire d. This allow s for the City to evaluate issues in meeting policy requirements as well as shifting resources, as needed, to meet financial policies. ▪ Departmental Revenues. The TSP recommendation is:
“The City has started to track revenues generated as a direct result of departmental activity.

This includes grants, user fees, fines, permit fees, etc. This tracking allows departments to understand how well they are able to cover costs from their services. Many departments expressed a desire to have more “control” over revenues and receive regular updates on revenue activity. Revenues by department should also be tracked in the budget document for Council review. Additionally, cost-recovery policies can then be set by department to both identify where the General Fund is subsidizing programs while targeting the level of subsidy desired.”
The City charges fees for many services provided (e.g., planning fees, recreation programs, etc.).

Some of these activities are subsidized but the City does not track or set policy targets for City subsidy of user-charged services. While efforts are underway to track these revenues, a lack of trained staff and limited accounting system have hindered implementation. Developmen t of revenue reports is underway. Showing revenues and expenditures by department is planned for the FY24 budget document.
0 2000
4000
6000
8000
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Salinas Crime Stats
2017-2021
Total Part I Crimes Grand Total

45 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Most of the revenue collected as “charges for service” is often coded to specific departments, but not specific programs. While this is not an uncommon practice, there are several reasons to track user-fee revenues by program:
▪ The City should no t be collecting more for a service that that service cost the City. This matching of fees to cost is often difficult to track – fees are set based on a certain level of service from prior years, and service fees are generated by current demand. The City should track revenues against cost -of-service to ensure that there is not an over -collecting of revenues over time.29

▪ There is often an implicit, if not explicit, policy embedded in setting charges for service. It is helpful to target an amount of revenue to be generated relative to the cost of providing services. For example, the Council may want to subsidize youth sports but charge adult sports the full cost for fields and referees. Planning fees are often charged to get full cost recovery from developers , while inspection fees for home improvements (e.g., roofs, widows, hot water heaters, etc.) are often charged at a level that encourages inspections, not full cost recovery.

▪ Departments should track their revenues to ensure that they are keeping up with rising costs and to consistently review opportunities to offset program costs where charging for services is appropriate.

MO-07 (RM02): Incorporate Multi-Year Financial Planning into All Budgetary Actions The TSP recommendation is:
“The City Council must regularly make significant financial decisions related to the City’s budget. It is important that the Council and public be well -informed of not only the immediate impacts of these decisions, but the long -term consequences as well. The NRN team utilized a ten -year forecasting model for this report to identify policies that will result in sustainable budget practices.

The City should in corporate the use of a five -to-ten-year budget forecasting model when considering actions which could have a significant impact on current or future budgets to inform policymakers about both the immediate and long-term consequences of their decisions.” Current Status: As noted above, the Finance Department has withgone change and turnover recently. Long- term budget forecasting has not been performed consistently. As Finance becomes fully staffed, the City plans to include a budget forecast model for future major financial decisions.

NEW RECOMMENDATIONS
MO-08: Include Leave Accruals and Cash Outs in Current Compensation Study The City has taken strides to reduce leave accruals and pay outs of leave (see analysis under MF03 above); however, total accruals are high and not calibrated to expected time off. This creates an increasing leave liability that has a real value to employees.

29 “Over-charging” likely will require several years of data to determine, as revenue and costs vary year-to-year.

46 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
The City has contracted with an outside party to perform a citywide compensation study. This study will likely be used to set compensation targets for many years to come. Based on experience with a broad range of other cities, Salinas has higher -than-typical leave accruals . As the City ’s consultant reviews total compensation comparisons, this benefit should be included as a form of compensation. While this is not typical, inclusion of leave accruals will better show the standing of City employees to competitor agencies.

If, as expected, the leave accruals are valuable compared to other agencies, a readjustment of the pay and benefits could align bargaining group members to better match current compensation needs of the employees.

MO-09: Evaluate the Parking Functions Within the City
The City has three components of its current parking program: the Downtown Parking District, the Parking Enforcement Division, and the preferential parking program. This recommendation focuses on downtown parking and parking enforcement.

The Downtown Parking District covers the structured parking and on -street parking in the downtown. A recommendation of the TSP was to make this fund self -supporting with no General Fund subsidy. While efforts have been made, they are very limited in scope. There are two primary issues still facing this district:

1. Based on the FY23 budget, the Downtown Parking District carries a negative fund balance of $2 million. This is nearly $200,000 more than it was in FY22. The only source of funding for this deficit is the General Fund. This is likely due to impacts from the pandemic. In any event, the City needs to evaluate ways to increase parking revenue to make parking self -supporting. This could be through raising rates, restricting on-street parking, or adding parking meters to help support the overall program.

2. CDD has indicated that talks are underwa y with the County to jointly construct a second parking garage. If this occurs, the City will need to evaluate its ability to fund both increased operating costs and the capital cost of construction —the current parking garage capital is funded through redevelopment bonds that are no longer available for future projects. The same options to fund current operations will need to be evaluated for additional future facilities. All parking garages should be at high utilization before another parking garage is constructed30 Parking Enforcement Division is a separate enterprise in the City, but part of the overall parking program (Parking District and Preferential Parking program). Parking Enforcement is operated by an outside vendor with minimal staff oversight —0.24 FTEs are assigned to this function. As budgeted, Parking Enforcement pays for its expenses through enforcement revenues.

The issues of the Parking Enforcement function came up in departmental interviews with both the Public Works department and the Police department. The current budget shows that Parking Enforcement is currently adequately funded and has a positive fund balance. The program is overs een by Public Works.

Concerns were raised over the current contractor, whether this should be a part of the public safety function or remain in Public Works, the ability of Public Works to adequately manage the program, as well as several related issues:

30 It is reported that the Monterey Street garage is significantly under-utilized. The City should bring this utilization up prior to investing in anther structured parking facility.

47 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
▪ The City needs to implement no -parking on street-sweeping days. This will require an increase in cost for signage and likely additional parking enforcement. ▪ Concerns have been raised about uncollected traffic fines from a previous parking enforcement vendor and the ability to expand the parking enforcement team . The lack of collection was not independently confirmed, but an audit of the program may be helpful to determine how efficient and effective the current enforcement vendor is operating as it has been in place for several years. ▪ Enforcement should not burden the General Fund, and some funding could be provided from a Storm Water assessment, if enacted.

Current Status. The City needs to prepare a plan for Parking Enforcement expansion and methods to make that expansion self -funding. Additionally, the City should evaluate the parking enforcement division and how it is operated and managed.

MO-10: Evaluate the Impact of Implementing the City’s Coming Compensation Study The City is in the process of developing a comprehensive compensation plan for the entire City. The plan will review current positions and pay compared to other agencies and against internal benchmarks . It is expected that the compensation plan study will result in recommendations to increase wages to more competitive targets. The City should actively look to implement the study’s recommendations within the shared limits of the entire City funding needs and the approved approach to funding capital.

Practically s peaking, this analysis will require implementation of several other TSP Refresh Plan recommendations: MO-07 (RM02) – using the forecast model to evaluate its impact and CFI-01 – develop a priority of all funding needs of the City to understand the full impact of the study implementation City Facilities and Infrastructure
The City has made strides in investments in buildings and infrastructure over the last several years, with the construction of a new Police Station, a planned new community center in the north Salinas , and the refurbishment of a former City pool facility underway, a replacement facility at Hebbron Heights and construction of a new El Gabilan Library to name a few. Using bond funds, accumulated revenue from higher-than-expected taxes, and grants the City is making a concerted effort to address its facility needs .

Further evidence of the City’s commitment to investing in its infrastructure is the plan on how to spend the over $51 million of funding from the federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and the designation of $8.1 million for a new community center in Council District 5.

Current Funding
The City has limited sources of current investment in facilities and infrastructure . However, investments are being made and continue to be a focus of City investment.

State Gas Taxes
On an ongoing basis, the City receives annual allocations from State gas taxes through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and the Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). These revenues provide a consistent funding for road investments. In FY23, the City should receive $3.9 million in HUTA and $3.6 million in RMRA funds.31 However, the City’s Pavement Management System Update in 2021 showed $169

31 Source: CaliforniaCityFinance.com

48 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
million in current maintenance backlog and calculated a future backlog growing to $341 million based on then-expected investment levels. With that level of investment, shown in the table below, the pavement condition index (CPI) will fall from 56 (fair) to 48 (poor)

ARPA
In response to the impacts of the Covid pandemic,
the federal government has provided significant
funding to cities through the American Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA). Federal allocations of funds to the City
of $51.6 million have been programmed by the City
primarily for capital investment.

As shown in the table to the right, the City has spread these funds over a range of facilities and programs.

Each of these investments reflects a long -standing
need in the community. While many local agencies
have used ARPA funds to uphold current services,
the City’s use of funds is consistent with long -term,
low-funded capital and program needs.

General Fund
General Government funding for capital covers a broad category of spending. The General Fund in FY23 includes $6.9 million for Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects . These project s range from a permanent homeless shelter, new radios and public safety vehicles, the Eas t Area Specific Plan, to Current Backlog
Planned Inv.

Per Year
Future
Backlog
Road Maintenance* $169 Million $6.3M/year $341 Million
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) 56 48
CIP Planned Investment ** $3.3M/Year
* 2020 Pavement Management System Update, 1/29/2021
** FY23 CIP, PDF p. 47 -- PM through FY26 with FY27 and FY28 blank City of Salinas
Pavement Management System Update Summary
City of Salinas
American Rescue Plan Act Appropriations
Category Funding
Public Facilities $11,502,313
Public Infrastructure $12,000,000
Water & Sewer $15,465,000
Homelessness/Housing $12,600,000
Total Appropriations $51,567,313
Appropriations by Facility Funding
Storm Water Infrastructure $5,845,000
Park Irrigation $5,000,000
Street Repair/Traffic Safety $6,000,000
Sidewalk Repairs $6,000,000
Fire Station Rennovations $1,500,000
Fire Station Repairs $1,400,000
City Hall Adaptations $5,002,313
Hebron Family Center $1,500,000
Firehouse Rec. Center $100,000
Playground Structures, etc. $2,000,000
Chinatown Nav. Cnt. Operations $1,000,000
SHARE Center Operations $1,000,000
Downtown Streets Team $600,000
Salinas Homeless Program $3,000,000
Affordable Housing Production $7,000,000
Total Non-Enterprise Funds $46,947,313
Sewer Enterprise $4,620,000
Total ARPA Funds $51,567,313
ARPA funding is required to be
encumbered by December 2024
and completed by December
2026. This will require focused
efforts on these projects and will
likely delay non-ARPA projects

49 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
repainting. All needed investments. The budget forecast model assumes continued funding of the General Fund (Measure E and Measure G capital funding in the CIP is limited to FY23).

Additionally, the Council has programed additional funding from expected FY22 excess revenues (un - audited). The major planned investment is a new community center in Council District No. 5 for $8.1 million (this adds to the $1.5 million from ARPA funds for a total of $9.6 million investment).

Additional Funding Needs
Even with the above funding, the City retains significant needs for capital projects. The chart below shows over $530 million of identified unfunded capital projects.

The primary needs, include:
▪ Road maintenance – needs to maintain/improve road conditions ▪ Parks Master Plan – net of identified funding32
▪ New Development
o Boronda Road completion
o New fire station
▪ IT Master Plan – Needed to maintain City’s increasing use of technology ▪ Implement National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements Not included in the “identified funding needs” are expected significant investments in citywide deferred maintenance of buildings and infrastructure. The City is in the process of cataloguing these needs, but the total need remains unknown.

32 Net funding shown in CFI-01 recommendation.
$0
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
$350,000,000
$400,000,000
$450,000,000
Road Maintenance Parks Master Plan IT Master Plan New Development Identified Funding Needs
for Select Funds
Reach 75 PCI
Maintain current 56 PCI*

50 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Policy Reserves
The City has been investing not only in its infrastructure but its reserves for future needs. The City has recently updated reserve policies and had diligently been working to fund to policy target levels. Continuing this funding will be important to the long term stability of the City’s finances; however, funding of reserves will also compete with funding for City infrastructure. The table below shows the current status of the City’s reserves.33

CONTINUING RECOMMENDATIONS
CFI-01 (OE05): Prepare a Preventive Maintenance Program for all City Facilities The City has a significant number of facility assets that are critical to the operation and services provided by the City. Asset management program being implemented. The TSP recommendation foresaw the following benefits of a preventive maintenance program :
“Developing a Preventive Maintenance Program would provide information across several areas:
▪ An analysis of existing conditions of City facilities and major systems (e.g., HVAC, roofing, etc.) ▪ A list of deferred maintenance by facility and an estimate of cost to bring each facility up to standard ▪ The cost of regular ongoing maintenance and expected system replacement costs over an appropriate time horizon
▪ A plan of action to address deferred maintenance and regular ongoing -maintenance needs for all City facilities
Ideally, a Preventive Maintenance Program will provide the following benefits to the City:

33 Reserve levels fluctuate year-to-year depending on how the City ends the fiscal year.

City of Salinas
Reserve Policy Target Vs. Fund Balances -- As of June 30, 2021 Reserve Requirement Target Working Capital
Over/(Under)
Target
General Funds - Unassigned 16,685,000 (16,685,000)
GF Economic Contingency 16,685,000 16,685,000 0
Facility Maintenace 3,154,000 3,154,000 0
Infrastructure Maintenance 7,368,000 3,684,000 (3,684,000) Vehicle Replacement 13,671,000 9,000,000 (4,671,000)
WC Self-Insurance 4 25,337,000 8,800,000 (16,537,000)
General Liability1 4,510,000 (4,510,000)
Retiree Health (OPEB) 3 11,832,000 1,000,000
Debt Service
Total Reserves 99,242,000 42,323,000 (46,087,000)
Pension Trust 2 162,408,690 6,000,000 (156,408,690)
1 From page 4 of Bickmore Actuarial report, October 19, 2022 2 From CalPERS acutarial reports as of June 30, 2021
3 From slide 55 of the Bartel Associates actuarial report, October 31, 2022 4 From page 3 or the October 2022 Worker's Comp. Actuarial 5 From City's Financial Audit for year ended June 30, 2021 Held Separately

51 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
▪ Provide the City Council with an understanding of what is not being funded in the annual budget. ▪ Lead to a plan to identify budget capacity over time to fully fund a preventive maintenance plan. ▪ Provide an analysis to determine if it is more cost-effective to replace key facility systems rather than incur high maintenance costs. For example, the parks irrigation systems are up to 50 years old and require a great deal of time and materials to keep in working order. Bringing these systems up to current standards could save on ongoing maintenance, water costs through more efficient control systems, and less replacement of plants.”34
Since adoption of the plan, the City has invested in replacing or updating many critical facilities, including:
construction of a new Police station, planning of a new recreation center in north Salinas, construction of a new El Galiban Library, and designated funding to replace the He bron community center facility. The City has also funded a $5 million program to replace irrigation systems at several parks. Even with these improvements, the City is significantly behind on investments in City facilities. An example of how far behind is shown in the recommended facility expense from the 2019 Parks Master Plan. As shown in the chart below, the Master Plan identified over $159 million of facilities improvements or additions for the City’s parks.

Most of this cost identified in the Parks Master Plan is to fund long -term deferred maintenance to the park facilities. To date, $16.7 million has been identified for funding, leaving $142 million for which no funding source currently exists.

In addition to Parks, critical needs have been identified in:
▪ The Public Works department estimates that City Hall needs significantly more than the $5 million in ARPA money in repairs;
▪ Fire stations have not been upgrade d recently and had significant deferred maintenance in 2018;
▪ Sherwood Hall has significant upgrades needed to meet current standards for a performance venue, including carpeting, sound system, and lighting ; and, ▪ Other City facilities to be identified.

Current Status . The City has recently purchased an asset management program that will be used to catalog the major systems in all City facilities. This will allow the City to document the age and condition of all City facilities and plan for an prioritize repair and maintenance. It is likely that completion of this process will result in the identification of millions of dollars of facility maintenance needs in the City.

Preparation and thought on how to fund these need s should begin now.

34 Page 78 of the 2018 “The Salinas Plan”
City of Salinas
Recreation Capital Costs and Funding
Facilities Estimated Cost Funding Net Unfunded Notes
Park Rennovations & Upgrades $135,797,000 2019 Master Plan Facilities & Centers $23,542,340 2019 Master Plan
Irrigation Upgrades ($5,000,000) ARPA Funding
Playgrounds, Benches, Grills ($2,000,000) ARPA Funding
Hebron Community Center ($9,600,000) Grant and ARPA Funding Firehouse Rec. Center ($100,000) ARPA Funding
Total $159,339,340 ($16,700,000) $142,639,340

52 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
CFI-02 (OE02): Citywide Fleet Strategy
The Salinas Plan identified a disconnected fleet management process. The City had divided fleet maintenance responsibilities between the Police department, the Fire department, and all other City vehicles. This decentralization of the fleet function le d to inconsistent d ocumentation of maintenance needs and a lack of coordination on vehicle replacement needs. The City has consolidated fleet maintenance with the Police Department and some Fire vehicles, but cannot currently offer the facilities or 24/7 service to take over fire engines.

The Public Works department is also moving forward on centralizing the City’s flee t replacement database. Some of this information is managed by Public Works and some still kept by Finance.

Development of a combined fleet replacement strategy will allow the City to better identify future needs and ensure funding is available to mainta in a workable fleet of vehicles.

Current Status . The City should continue moving toward a fully centralized fleet function. This includes maintenance and maintenance tracking of all City vehicles as well as development of a fleet replacement strategy.

CFI-03 (MC02) Eliminate General Fund Subsidy of Golf Course Debt Service Golf course debt is still funded partially by the City. While revenues from Golf Course leases bring in $160,000 per year from contractors that also maintain the golf courses , debt service from FY23 through FY27 is above $650,000. The Twin Creeks debt service is paid off in FY27, and continuing debt service for the Fairways golf course is $270,000 per year. This debt servi ce escalates through FY38 when it is fully funded. The graph below shows the debt service by year for each golf course.

The debt service is funded with a combination of the lease payments from Golf Course operators and a $450,000 transfer from the Gene ral Fund. The issue with the golf course debt is threefold:

1. The City is subsidizing golf when there are so many other basic funding needs for capital projects that are not funded .

2. The capital needs for the golf courses will continue beyond the current deb t service. Like all facilities, golf courses need consistent investment in fairways, greens, sand traps, etc. that will continue to tax the General Fund in ways not yet identified .

3. The golf leases are used to pay debt service and not to reinvest in future needs of both courses . $0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33 FY34 FY35 FY36 FY37 FY38 Golf Course Debt Sevice
Twin Creeks Fairways

53 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Current Status. The recommendation in the TSP was to monetize a portion of the Fairways golf course to pay off the debt and develop a portion of the golf course to promote economic development. As the City evaluates the full measure of its overall need for infrastructure investments, it should continue to evaluate implementation of this recommendation. Alternatively, the City should work to increase golf- course revenues to meet full City needs going forward. This could be fr om increases to leases paid to the City or ensuring that the long -term maintenance of golf -course facilities is paid for through the leases.

CFI-04 (MC03) Eliminate Sherwood Hall Deficits
The TSP identified funding issues with Sherwood Hall and recommende d the following actions:

1. Engage in a long -term lease of the entire facility . Prior leases have left the City with significant deferred costs at the end of the lease. The City is not certain what local entity could fund the full cost in a lease contract.

2. Sale of the Sherwood Hall facility . The pandemic derailed the ability to seriously look at a sale of the facility.

Current Status : The pandemic has limited the ability to book events or attract outside investors. In addition to the issues raised in 2018, the pandemic has further limited investment in Sherwood Hall.

Current issues include:
▪ The City is piecemealing operations. Using temporary staff for technical work and part time staff for general operations .
▪ There is no active promotion of the Sherwood Hall venue as there are no resource s to do this. ▪ The financial system does not track revenues and expenses for the Hall in a manner that can provide regular feedback on the venues fiscal viability .

Updated Recommendation . Full use of Sherwood Hall will require a significant investment to address deferred maintenance and update sound equipment, etc. Additional staff will likely also be needed to fully operate this venue. Past leases have not fully covered all operating and maintenance costs, leaving the City with more deferred maintenance when the lease ended. The City needs to generate a full estimate of deferred maintenance and operating costs (if the City maintains ownership). With this data, the City can then decide h ow to proceed with either operating, leasing, or selling the Sherwood Hall venue.

NEW RECOMMENDATION
CFI-05: Develop an Implementation Approach to Prioritize and Fund the Most Pressing City Needs Much of this report provides documentation on competing needs in the City. The City has more ways to invest in the City than it has resources to provide funding. The need to invest in staff will absorb resources that could be used for other City demands. Spending on capital may limit spending on staffing and other operating costs. Some of the major investment needs facing the City are included in the table below.

Need Estimated Cost
Personnel costs/FTEs have been stagnant—a
comprehensive compensation study is underway
$700,000 Per 1% increase in total salaries.

Over 5 years this will increase to $4.7 million
per year, compounded
Deferred maintenance needs are underway in being
quantified, and it is expected that significant issues
needing immediate attention will be discovered
Unknown for most City facilities
$40 Million City Hall
$135 Million in parks

54 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Expanded services will (e.g., Hebron Community
Center, new Fire Station, Carr Lake park dedication)
will continue adding costs to the Cities General
Government expenses
East Area Fire Station -- $4 million per year
Staffing for new community centers (average
of $100,000 per FTE)
IT service expansion $6.5 Million
Parks Master Plan implementation $142 Million
Road maintenance needs simply to maintain current
“fair” service, let along improving the overall road
conditions
$20 million per year
Implementing the in-process Fire Master Plan unknown
Funding fleet replacement needs unknown
Providing 24/7 fleet maintenance services for all
departments
Unknown
Affordable Housing Likely no limit
Homelessness Response Likely no limit

Under this recommendation, the City should fill out—and expand—the estimated cost of the above list of funding needs and assign a priority to each. These priorities can then be used to inform development of a funding approach to meet the City’s various funding demands. The list of priorities can also serve to inform the public of the immense revenue needs faced by the City and how the various voter -approved revenue sources recommended in the TSP and in this Refresh plan will help meet those needs.

Without a comprehensive, prioritized list of needs showing how voter -approved funding will be used, the City is unlikely to generate the funds necessary to address many of these needs.

Investments for a Healthy City
The City of Salinas has worked diligently to bolster and expand its revenue base in order to provide an adequate level of service to the residents and businesses that call Salinas home. The City has passed two sales tax measures that currently provide $49.7 million of revenue to the City, over one-third of total General Government revenue. Measure G, projected to bring in $32.9 million in FY23, is scheduled to sunset in April 2030.

55 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
As shown in this report, the City has significant investment needs in both services and infrastructure that will require more, not less, revenue in the coming years. In large part, the City suffers from the municipal revenue system in California that rewards population and business growth and has little to no local government control. By virtue of location,
wealth of the local population, and
attractiveness to retail stores, many cities
of similar population in northern California
have significantly more revenue than the
City of Salinas. The table and chart below
show that Salinas is 27% to 32% lower in
General Fund revenue (including Measures
E & G) than four comparative cities , even
though Salinas has the highest add -on
sales tax of any of these cities.

It is an unfortunate fact that under current
rules of revenue generation for a city in
California, Salinas requires additional
revenue sources to provide the bare
necessities of municipal s ervices and
maintenance of its significant investment
in infrastructure and facilities. The
potential loss of Measure G (discussed
below) will have a catastrophic impact on
the City’s services if not extended. Additionally, the City needs to tap addition al sources of revenue to continue moving forward.

Based on the rules of municipal finance in California, any new or extended revenue source (unless it is a direct charge for services) must be approved by the voters of the City. In order to move forward wi th its plans to keep improving services and facilities, retain and attract qualified City employees, and improving the life of City residents, the City must protect and expand its sources of revenue.

The recommendations below are mostly from the TSP and are recommended to be continued in this refresh analysis. Due to the significant cost of road maintenance repair needed – and its growth each year—an additional recommendation to vote on and issue General Obligation bonds is included.

CONTINUING RECOMMENDATIONS
IHC-01 (NR01) Enact Storm Sewer Utility Fee to Fund Current Transfers of General Fund Revenue to Storm Sewer Operations.

The City currently subsidizes the storm sewer function by over $2.5 million per year. While storm sewer is listed as an enterprise fund, the General Fund transfers are the primary source of funding. In addition, the City will need to begin street sweeping in the near future to comply with new NPDES requirements to limit storm sewer runoff . Public Works staff estimate t he cost of this program to exceed $1 million per year.

Additionally, there are State mandates on storm sewer runoff that the City does not have the resources to $0
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
Roseville Hayward Santa
Rosa
Sunnyvale Salinas
GF Revenue Comparison
Similar Sized Cities
Comparison of Total GF Revenues
Northern California Cities -- Similar Population
City Population GF Revenue Add-On Sales Tax
Roseville 148,794 $211,387,000 1.00%
Hayward 161,744 $199,141,000 0.50%
Santa Rosa 177,396 $197,502,000 0.25%
Sunnyvale 155,326 $196,766,000 0.00%
Salinas 161,777 $143,732,000 1.50%

56 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
currently meet. Implementing a storm sewer utility fee could provide additional revenue to me et these mandates.

Under a new State law, the City can charge a utility -like fee for storm run -off that drains into federal waterways. Instituting a storm sewer fee requires two distinct steps: (a) developing and implementing an operating and capital plan for the stewardship of the City’s storm water assets; and (b) creating a revenue stream to fund this ongoing responsibility.35
The City attempted a storm sewer utility charge prior to the TSP study but was sued and was unable to implement the program. Since that time, SB231 was passed by the California legislature to clarify the ability to enact a storm sewage fee under provisions of Proposition 218. SB231 has not been tested by the courts and remains contentious. While the City’s history with this fee makes a new fee uncertain, the City should move forward in a prudent manner to limit the cost of the storm sewer funded by the General Fund.

Because the storm sewer fee is a property -related fee, the impacts of this fee would be to the property owner. A ssuming rents are charged at market rates, this fee should have little to no impact on current renters.

Current Status. Charging a utility fee for this service will ensure proper funding for this crucial function while also funding future expansion of programs without impacting the General Fund. The recommendation to pursue this funding sources remains intact.

IHC-02 (NR02): Increase Hotel Tax and Dedicate Funding to Capital Investment.

The City’s hotel tax is one of the lowest in the region. An increase in the TOT could free up other General Fund revenue to be used for capital investment. An increase in the TOT does not ha ve an impact on the residents or property owners of the City and helps capture the impact that short-term rentals in hotels and short-term home rentals have on City services.

Current Status . The City maintains a need for additional revenue. TOT does no t impact current City residents or businesses and remains as a recommendation. The additional general fund revenue from an increased TOT will open up space for the City to invest more in capital needs.

IHC-03 (RM01): Request that the Salinas Community to Make the Measure G Sales Tax Permanent.

Measure G is one of the largest revenue source s for the City’s General Governments funds. Measure G funds both ongoing debt service and a number of City employee positions. Loss of this revenue source— currently set as April 2030—will have a significant impact on the City’s operations and should be put to the voters to extend past this current sunset date.

Measure G is used for a variety of programs and services in the current FY23 budget. As shown in the pie chart below, 64 percent of measure G funds operations, and the remaining 36% funds capital and debt service for the Police Headquarters. By function, public safety funding comprises 67 percent36 of Measure

35 2018 The Salinas Plan, p. 82
36 Public safety is broadly defined to include $5.3 million of funding for “Youth Prevention” and $1.4 million for Code Enforcement.

57 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
G, with building maintenance making up the next biggest chunk of funding at 18%. Overall, Measure G is being used for vital city services and has become a critical part of funding key City services.

Total FTEs funded by Measure G in FY23 are shown in the table to the right. The youth prevention program includes the FTEs for Youth Services and Recreation. The loss of Measure G would have a significant impact on the City’s public safety and road maintenance functions.

Current Status. The City is discussing commissioning a survey of potential voters to understand what the sentiment of voters is on Measure G and other potential voter-approved revenue measures. The City will need to go before the voters in either the fall of 2024 , 2026, or 2028 to avoid the sunset of Measure G.

IHC-04 (IN01): Dedicate Savings to Capital Investment The City has been funding increasing amounts of capital from General Fund savings. As demonstrated earlier, there is not sufficient funding to meet all of the City’s capital needs. This recommendation is continuing as an ongoing reminder to evaluate the use of any excess fund on an annual basis. Capital is not the only need, but it is a significant ongoing one that will impact the City in future years if not addressed.

NEW RECOMMENDATION
IHC-05: Evaluate a General Obligation (“GO”) Bond to Fund Key City Projects The City cannot afford all of its capital or social needs from the current municipal revenue sources. A GO bond imposes increased ad valorem property taxes—as allowed under Prop. 13—to re-pay bonds for capital improvements. A GO bond was included in the TSP as a potential funding source for affordable housing; Operations
$21,295,238
64%
Capital
Projects
$4,957,110
15%
Debt Service
$5,423,500
16%
Other
$1,702,100
5%
Measure G Funding FY23
By Type
Measure G Supported FTE
Function FTE
Police & Fire 41.50
Public Works 36.30
Recreation 13.00
Code Enforcement 10.00
Youth Services 3.00
Support 7.00
CDD 1.10
Total FTE 111.90
Public Safety
$21,403,005
67%
Building
Maint.
$5,577,715
18%
Other
Operations
$1,238,018
4%
Other
Capital
$3,457,110
11%
Measure G Funding FY23
by Function

58 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
however, the City’s significant road maintenance needs are also an appropriate use of GO bonds. The City should evaluate projects that best meet the needs of the community and decide when to request voter approval. This will likely require a survey of local voters, as described under recommendation IHC-03.

Housing & Homelessness
The Community Development Department has been working diligently to address both the issues of homelessness and affordable housing. However, the crushing issues outlined in the original TSP are largely still in place. The TSP Refresh does not do a “refresh” of the Housing and Homelessness work from 20 18.

The work of the City is moving along, and the recommendations from the original TSP are still valid for these vital needs. The original TSP section should be read for a full description of the housing and homelessness issues still facing the City.

Housing
Since 2018, the City has completed the Alisal Vibrancy Plan as well as the Chinatown Master Plan. These plans identify potential development opportunity sites for new development. CDD is partnering with Monterey County for potential investment in the Alisal.

The City is also pursuing grants and funneling federal funds to assist in development of new housing stock.

These include: Home Key grants, CDBG funding focused in areas with low/moderate housing stock, dedication of $7 million in ARPA funding for affordable housing, and partnering with Department of Human services to place affordable housing near the Sheriff Center site.

Overall, the City is actively seeking opportunities to enable more affordable housing. Funding will continue to be an issue, and CDD is actively seeking funding and partnerships form a variety of sources. As the New Growth Area begins to develop, a portion of this housing will be offered as affordable to the community Homelessness
Based on the lates census of homeless persons, the City’s homeless population has decreased 10 percent from the previous census. This is may be due to better census-taking methods, but shows movement in the right direction. In addition, the City has added a number of program and staff resources to continue improvements for the homeless population. Recent accomplishments include:
▪ Opening of Moongate housing in 2010
▪ Joint funding of Share Center with Monterey County. Approximately 89 exits to permanent housing ▪ Decrease in homelessness of 10 percent in 2022 census ▪ Manage three Home Key grants
▪ Family homeless challenge grant of $2.6 million to build accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on existing properties
▪ $5.6 million of ARPA funding for a variety of homeless programs ▪ Creation of a homeless team of four FTEs. Currently grant funded and could require City General Government funding in future years
Even with all of these improvements, City services are reported to experience significant impacts from homelessness in the City. In interviews with multiple departments, homeless was listed as a major service impact:

59 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
▪ CDD, the Community Development Department , oversees homelessness programs, coordinates with the County, and applies for grants to provide services. ▪ Police documented 4,400 responses related to homelessness from January through October of 2022, or 440 per month. This is estimated to be under-counted. ▪ Fire often responds in concert with police calls and report needing to respond to ongoing issues with fires started in homeless encampments.
▪ Public Works is tasked with coordinating and funding clean -up of homeless encampments. This occurs several times a year.

For various reasons, there is shared response to the homelessness issue, but less coordination of response.

Each department responds to different issues and has a different relationship with the homeless community. Coordination can be hindered by differing perceptions of who a homeless person is interacting with.

CONTINUING RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations from the TSP are recommended for continued implementation. The issues surrounding the City’s housing and homelessness issues were well documented in the original TSP and stand as a valid description of the continuing challenges the City faces . That section of the TSP can be used to provide more context to these recommendations. While the City continues to make strides in both affordable housing and homelessness – including new funding from grants, ARPA, and other sources —the issues faced are long term. The recommendation s from the TSP are large enough and broad enough to encompass the major efforts needed to continue to address these issues. While progress has been made, the heart of these recommendation are still valid at this time.

HH-01 (IN04): Convene Stakeholders to Develop an Implementation Plan to Create More than 4,000 New Units of Affordable Housing in the Next Ten Years ARPA funds have been dedicated along with Home Key grants and a partnership with the County. CDD uses the Technical Advisory Committee as an oversight board. This should continue to be reviewed and expanded to a broader group of stakeholders when helpful.

HH-02 (IN05): Establish a Housing Trust Fund with a Dedicated Revenue Stream for Affordable Housing
The City attempted to implement this recommendation with Monterey County, but it did not work out.

With dedicated ARPA funds, the City plans to reach out to the State to see if Salinas can received State matching funds for a trust alone or in partnership with oth ers (i.e., Santa Cruz) . The City does receive housing funds through the permanent housing fund allocation.

HH-03 (IN06): Develop a Land Strategy to Leverage Private Market Investment to Create up to 2,400 New Units of Affordable Housing.

Originally targeted to new development, CDD is shifting goal to infill projects. This will require updates to zoning ordinances and support by the community . The City is looking to use ARPA funds to acquire properties that could be used as new affordable housing sites. Development of these sites would be done in concert with private developers.

60 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
HH-04 (IN07): Create Regulations to Address Safety and Health Conditions in Rental and Other Group Housing.

This is dependent on the establishment of the rental registry t o fully understand and manage the housing stock. This remains a critical recommendation for the City and the safety o f residents in rental units. The City needs to implement the rental registry to determine the number of rental units and their condition.

HH-05 (NR05): Rental Registry and Inspection Fees
Expected to be presented to Council by CDD in 2023. Establishment of the registry will help drive future regulatory changes. If the registry is not established, the City will not have the tools needed to adequately address the issues with the current housing stock.

NEW RECOMMENDATION
HH-06: Expand SORT Team to Include Public Safety Members Several departments are experiencing impacts form the City’s homeless population. The impacts are both service-related (Police and Fire) as well as service and financial (Public Works). CDD takes the lead on housing and homelessness issues and coordinates the City’s homelessness response.

One of the major programs directly addressing homelessness in major impact areas is the Salinas Outreach and Response Team (SORT). This team is comprised of ten part time employees and volunteers . Initially SORT was a response to issues that arose during the pandemic. This has been a successful program and provides a good deal of on-the-ground engagement with the homeless community.

In addition to the current staff and volunteers, CDD has identified a need for engagement with police and paramedic personnel to assist in the ongoing outreach. Given recruitment and retention issues in police and the need for paramedic personnel in Fire Department daily response, assigning personnel from the Police and Fire department on a periodic basis will help determine the value of expanding the SORT tea m.

This will offer starting point to evaluate if expanded staffing reduces or improves police and fire response and results in improved outcomes in the City’s homelessness response.

Appendix A – 2023 “The Salinas Plan Refresh” Recommendations Initiative
Plan To
Implement
(YES/NO/With
Modifications)
Implementation
Timeline
Implementation
Responsibility
Date
Implemented
Managing the Organization (MO)
MO-01 Healthcare Cost Containment
MO-02 Improve Base Pay on a Cost-Neutral Basis
MO-03 Evaluate the Total Leave Program
MO-04 Continue to Address Workers' Compensation Costs, Moving Towards Sound Actuarial Funding
MO-05 Police Civilianization
MO-06 Improve Budget Process and Monitoring
MO-07 Incorporate Multi-Year Financial Planning into All Budgetary Actions MO-08 Include Leave Accruals and Cash Outs in Current Compensation Study MO-09 Evaluate the Parking Functions Within the City
MO-10 Evaluate the impact of implementing the City’s Coming Compensation Study City Facilities & Infrastructure (CFI)
CFI-01 Prepare a Preventive Maintenance Program for all City Facilities CFI-02 Citywide Fleet Strategy
CFI-03 Eliminate General Fund Subsidy of Golf Course Debt Service CFI-04 Eliminate Sherwood Hall Deficits
CFI-05 Develop an Implementation Approach to Prioritize and Fund the Most Pressing City Needs

62 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Initiative
Plan To
Implement
(YES/NO/With
Modifications)
Implementation
Timeline
Implementation
Responsibility
Date
Implemented
Investments for a Healthy City (IHC)
IHC-01 Enact Storm Sewer Utility Fee to Fund Current Transfer of General Fund Revenues to Storm Sewer Fund
IHC-02 Increase Hotel Tax and Dedicate Funding that Results to Capital Investment IHC-03 Request the Salinas Community to Make the Measure G Sales Tax Permanent IHC-04 Dedicate Savings to Capital Investment
IHC-05 Evaluate a General Obligation (“GO”) Bond to Fund Key City Projects Housing and Homelessness (HH)
HH-01 Convene Stakeholders to Develop an Implementation Plan to Create More than 4,000 New Units of Affordable Housing in the Next Ten Years HH-02 Establish a Housing Trust Fund with a Dedicated Revenue Stream for Affordable Housing
HH-03 Develop a Land Strategy to Leverage Private Market Investment to Create up to 2,400 New Units of Affordable Housing
HH-04 Create Regulations to Address Safety and Health Conditions in Rental and Other Group Housing
HH-05 Use Multiple Sources to Provide Revenue for the Housing Trust Fund HH-06 Expand SORT Team to Include Public Safety Members

63 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
Appendix B – Other Items of Importance
The City is a complex mix of services, facilities, and infrastructure all designed to meet the needs of the City residents and businesses within the confines of revenue generated through the complex rules of the State of California. It is impossible to capture all of the coming needs, or future revenues, of the City in a single study. For example, the City has ongoing Fire and compensation studies currently that may add to issues that the City needs to address.

Towards the end of this Refresh work, several items were raised that are not explicitly addressed in the body of the study. They are listed below with some level discussion. The larger issue here is to recognize that the City is a dynamic organization with changing and evolving needs. The original TSP and this Refresh capture many of the large-scale challenges the City faces. More will arise and some will fall away. The City needs to be regularly reviewing current needs, past practices, and what changes are needed to address the most pressing issues.
▪ CalPERS - The Cities pension liabilities are currently forecast to be fairly flat over the next several years. However, the current issues in the equities markets led to a significant loss in FY22 and could lead to additional losses this year. CalPERS will calculate the impact of the FY22 loses in next year’s pension actuarial reports. This will likely raise costs in the next several years. ▪ Measure E & G Committees – The City is pulled in a number of different directions across all services. Opportunities for simplification of processes should be continually reviewed. For example, the City has two voter-approved transaction and use taxes and two committees that provide mainly oversight and audit review, but can also offer recommendations on spending for Council consideration37. Perhaps the oversight/review function can be consolidated into one committee.
▪ Begin to Electrify City Vehicle Fleet. The California Governor issued Executive Order N-79-20 calling for a goal to make all passenger vehicles and trucks sold in the State to be electric by 2035. Medium and heavy-duty vehicles have a target goal of 2045 to become electric. The City needs to start considering how to make this transition over the short- and long-term. ▪ Work to complete Boronda Road Expansion – Boronda Road is an important link in the transportation system on the north and northeast side of the City. While mentioned previously, the need to continue investing in City infrastructure is the important issue to continue addressing, particularly relating to the Future Growth Area Additionally, the Future Growth Area will need forecasting for future public safety and public works needs. ▪ Reliance on Technology – Society relies more and more on technology to accomplish everyday tasks, communication, record keeping, etc. The City needs to continually review technology needs and plan for changes. One issue that has recently emerged is the City’s current Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) was sold to a new company and will not be updated in the future. This is a major software component for the Finance and Human Resources departments and will be a

37 The Measure E and G taxes are General Fund revenues and fall 100% under the authority of th e City Council to make final decisions on the use of these revenues.

64 | P a g e
THE SALINAS PLAN REFRESH 2023
major cost to replace. Continuing management of IT could require reviewing the entire IT infrastructure, staffing, and location of department in the City’s hierarchy. ▪ Dispose Old Police Station –The City built a new police station and has yet to decide how to dispose or reuse the old station. This asset provides an opportunity for reuse or to generate funds by a sale. This serves as a reminder that often cities have underutilized assets that should be addressed.
▪ Update safety of buildings -- The City recently had a safety assessment of buildings conducted.

This assessment identified a number of issues that need to be addressed in the current safety environment: card key access system for all City buildings, a redesign or City Hall to limit public access to name a few. This will provide safe access to City facilities for both employees and the general public.
▪ Workforce housing -- In conversations with City labor groups, the issue of workforce housing was raised as a concern both for current employees as well as the ability to attract new employees to the City. To the extent that the City’s housing strategy can address this need, it should be included.

“The Salinas Plan”
Refresh
Presentation to the City Council
March 21, 2023

The Salinas Plan Refresh
Overview
▪ Review and “refresh” of 2018 The Salinas Plan
▪ Status of TSP recommendations – What has been completed, in -progress, and what has been rejected as feasible
▪ Addition of updated/new recommendations reflecting current economic and service challenges faced by the City
Process
▪ Updated budget forecast model
▪ Review of current departmental plans and studies
▪ Interviews with department leaders and line -staff
▪ Review of updated historical metrics – budget, services, service results RBConsulting
2 Status of The Salinas Plan (TSP)
▪ The City has been working
diligently on implementing the TSP
2018 Recommendations
▪ Over 1/3 of the original
recommendations have been
implemented or rejected
▪ The remaining recommendations
are in progress or recommended to
remain as active
RBConsulting
3 0
2 4
6 8
10 12
Implemented In Progress Continued Rejected New (Tent.)
Status of The Salinas Plan Initiatives
Revenues & Expenses
RBConsulting
4 Recent General Government Revenues
RBConsulting
5 Property Taxes,
35,792,585,
25%
Sales Tax
86,839,000
60%
Utility Taxes
11,900,000
8%
Transient
Occupancy
Tax
3,500,000
3%
Business
License
Tax
5,700,000
4%
General Fund Tax Revenue
by Type
Property Taxes Sales Tax Utility Taxes
Transient Occupancy Tax Business License Tax
▪ General Government revenues grew 4.6%
per year from FY17-FY22, led by sales taxes
at 5.6% per year
Property Taxes
Sales Tax
Utility Taxes
Other Taxes
Franchise Fees
Charges for Service
Transfers
Other
0 20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
180,000,000
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
City of Salinas General Government Revenues
Actual FY17-FY22
General Government Expenses
General Government Salaries grew at 1.7%
per year since FY17-FY22, led by lower FTEs,
limited wage increases
Total General Government expenses
grew 4.7% per year (FY17-FY23), led by
Transfers and Benefits
RBConsulting
6CAGR = Compound Annual Growth Rate

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%
0 10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
FY17
Actual
FY18
Actual
FY19
Actual
FY20
Actual
FY21
Actual
FY22
Actual
Wage & Benefit Growth
FY17-FY22
Salaries Overtime Wage CAGR (FY17-22) OT CAGR (FY17-FY22) 0 20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
FY17
Actual
FY18
Actual
FY19
Actual
FY20
Actual
FY21
Actual
FY22
Actual
Expenses by Category
FY17 to FY22
Salaries Overtime Benefits Outside Services
Other Charges Other Expenditures Transfers
Change in FTE
FY09 To FY23
No Recovery from Great Recession
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 General Operations FTE
FY09 to FY23
Public Safety Other Total
FY18 to FY23
Limited Investment in New Staff
546.4
543.7 545.9 540.7 529.9
559.0
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
Staffing By Department
FY18-FY23
Police Fire Public Works Community Services CDD Administrative RBConsulting 7
Budget Forecast
RBConsulting
8 Baseline Forecast Net GF Revenue
▪ Needs to increase wages, add staff, maintain infrastructure and invest in new projects could upend this fragile balance even with an extended Measure G RBConsulting
9 ($40,000,000)
($30,000,000)
($20,000,000)
($10,000,000)
$0
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32
City of Salinas Baseline
General Government Budget Forecast
General Fund Measure E Measure G
Measure G to Sunset on
April 1, 2030
Alternative Forecasts | General Gov’t
▪ Alt. 1 – Measure G extended +
salaries up add’l 1% per year *
▪ Alt. 2 – Alt. 1 + 10% revenue set-
aside for capital funding **
▪ Alt. 3 – Alt. 2 + Property and Sales
Tax add’l 1% per year
RBConsulting
10* Includes both wage increases and additional hiring ** Total funding, including current expecting CIP funding ($5,000,000)
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32
Alternative No. 1 Net Revenue
Extend Measure G & Inc. Salaries + 1%
($10,000,000)
($5,000,000)
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32
Alternative No. 2 Net Revenue
Alt No. 1. + Fund Capital at 10% of Net Revenue
($10,000,000)
($5,000,000)
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32
Alternative No. 3 Net Revenue
Alt No. 2 + Property Tax and Sales Tax Add'l 1% Growth
General Fund
A Future of
Trade Offs
RBConsulting
11 Recommendation Groupings
RBConsulting
12 Managing the
Organization
City Facilities
&
Infrastructure
Housing
Investments
for a healthy
City
Coming Issues
▪ Measure G Sunset in April 2030
▪ Expanding fire to new growth areas
▪ Staffing – FTEs and pay has been stagnant. Define the needs in each along with funding consequences
▪ Deferred Maintenance – Creating budget space to address  No estimate of the breadth and cost across the City
 PW identified roads, storm drainage, and utility systems with major (cost unknown) deferred maint.  No estimate on buildings, but implementing an asset management program  More investment in IT
 Fire indicated deferred maintenance on fire stations and apparatus ▪ Continued community investment
▪ Funding Reserves
RBConsulting
13 Measure G
▪ The Measure G sunset looms large for the City
▪ If not extended, the City will lose over $32 million in total funding annually RBConsulting
14 Measure G Supported FTE
Function FTE
Police & Fire 41.50
Public Works 36.30
Recreation 13.00
Code Enforcement 10.00
Youth Services 3.00
Support 7.00
CDD 1.10
Total FTE 111.90
Significant Capital Investment
▪ Over $530 million in road, parks, new
development, and IT needs identified in
recent studies
 New development impacts include Borondo Road
and new Fire Station
▪ Deferred maintenance for buildings is
not currently known but will be calculated
using a new asset management program.

Need will likely be significant
RBConsulting
15 $0
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
$350,000,000
$400,000,000
$450,000,000
Road Maintenance Parks Master Plan IT Master Plan New Development Identified Funding Needs
for Select Funds
Maintain
current 56
PCI*
Reach 75
PCI
PCI = Pavement Condition Index. A PCI of 55 is “fair” and 75 is “good”. Current funding levels will drop the City’s PCI to 48, or “poor”
Salinas has significant
unfunded capital and
maintenance needs
Additional Needs to Consider
▪ Capital Investments (~$500 Million)
▪ Deferred maintenance (amount
unknown)
▪ Investments in Sherwood Hall and
other City facilities
▪ Housing and Homelessness programs
▪ Employee compensation study
implementation
▪ Fully fund policy reserves
RBConsulting
16 City of Salinas
Reserve Policy Target Vs. Fund Balances -- As of June 30, 2021 Reserve Requirement Target Working Capital
Over/(Under)
Target
General Funds - Unassigned 16,685,000 (16,685,000)
GF Economic Contingency 16,685,000 16,685,000 0
Facility Maintenace 3,154,000 3,154,000 0
Infrastructure Maintenance 7,368,000 3,684,000 (3,684,000) Vehicle Replacement 13,671,000 9,000,000 (4,671,000)
WC Self-Insurance 4 25,337,000 8,800,000 (16,537,000)
General Liability1 4,510,000 (4,510,000)
Retiree Health (OPEB) 3 11,832,000 1,000,000
Debt Service
Total Reserves 99,242,000 42,323,000 (46,087,000)
Pension Trust 2 162,408,690 6,000,000 (156,408,690)
1 From page 4 of Bickmore Actuarial report, October 19, 2022 2 From CalPERS acutarial reports as of June 30, 2021
3 From slide 55 of the Bartel Associates actuarial report, October 31, 2022 4 From page 3 or the October 2022 Worker's Comp. Actuarial 5 From City's Financial Audit for year ended June 30, 2021 Held Separately
Recommendations
RBConsulting
17 Summary of Recommendations
RBConsulting
18 Managing the
Organization
Healthcare Cost Cont.

Improve Base Pay
Workers’ Compensation
Police Civilianization
Improve Budget Process
Multi-Year Financial Planning
Leave Accruals in Comp. Study
Parking Functions
Implement Comp Study
City Facilities &
Infrastructure
Preventive Maint. Program
Fleet Strategy
Eliminate Golf Subsidy
Eliminate Sherwood Hall Deficits
Fund Most Pressing City Needs
Investments for a
Healthy City
Enact Storm Sewer Utility Fee
Increase Hotel Tax
Extend Measure G
Dedicate Savings to Capital
Evaluate GO Bonds for Key Projects
Housing &
Homelessness
Develop Strategic Housing Plan
Establish Housing Trust Fund
Develop Land Strategy
Regulate Rental Housing
Fund Housing Trust Fund
Expand SORT Team
New Recommendations in the Refresh
Managing the Organization
▪ Include leave accruals and cash outs in current compensation study ▪ Evaluate the parking function within the City
▪ Evaluate impact of implementing City’s coming compensation study City Facilities & Infrastructure
▪ Develop an implementation approach to fund capital needs Investments for a Healthy City
▪ Evaluate a General Obligation (“GO”) Bond to Fund Key City Projects Homelessness and Housing
▪ Expand SORT team to include Public Safety members
RBConsulting
19 Questions?
RBConsulting
20 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-157, Version: 1
Annual Public Art Plan
Approve a Resolution accepting the annual public art plan and authorizing use and appropriation of up to $8,000 from the Municipal Art Fund to fund the proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Annual Public Arts Plan.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: MARCH 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY & COMMUNITY SERVICES
FROM: KRISTAN LUNDQUIST, LCS DIRECTOR
BY: JOSE ARREOLA, COMMUNITY SAFETY ADMINISTRATOR
TITLE: ANNUAL PUBLIC ART PLAN

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution accepting the annual public art plan and authorizig use and appropriation of up to $8,000 from the Municipal Art Fund to fund the proposed Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 Annual Public Arts Plan.

BACKGROUND:

On May 16, 2017, the City Council adopted an Ordinance establishing a Public Art Program. The Ordinance created a Municipal Art Fund which is funded exclusively from contributions made by public construction projects. The Ordinance imposes upon the City the requirement to contribute an amount not to exceed on -half percent (0.5%) of the total project cost of each eligible capital improvement program project to a Municipal Art Fund. The money is deposited into the fund every June at the end of the fiscal year. There is a cap of $50,000 for any one project and a cap of $100,000 for spending in one year. The current balance is $22,942.46.

One of the Public Art Commission’s (PAC) primary activities is the preparation of a n Annual Public Arts Plan, that builds off the City’s Public Art Master Plan and includes specific activities that promotes public art and recommends the release of funds from the Municipal Art Fund to cover the costs of the activities described in the annual plan. Per Ordinance, the Public Arts Annual Plan will be submitted to the City Council annually no later than April 1.

In a special meeting of the PAC on February 9, 2023, an Annual Plan Sub -Committee was established. The sub -committee met twice (on Feb. 21 & Feb. 23) to prepare a draft plan.

Consistent with the 2023 Annual Public Art Plan, the sub-committee is recommending continuing the grant program that would support new or existing art centered events with a required match of funds and improve marketing of the Public Art Commissions meetings and activities including the new grant program. The sub -committee recommends $7,500 be made available to continue the grant program and $500 for marketing efforts. In total the sub-committee recommends the Public Art Commission request $8,000 for fiscal year 2024. The committee also recommends that there be a shortened grant application period so all applicants can be reviewed at once. The Public Art Page | 2
Commission voted unanimously to “receive the annual public art plan and recommend the Salinas City Council adopt the fiscal year 2024 public art plan including the appropriation of $8,000 from the municipal art fund” at their regular meeting on Monday, February 28.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project . The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The use of Municipal Art funds to enhance Public Art in Salinas supports City Council Strategic Plan Goal: Investment Strategies/Risk Management

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

LCS staff have been in communication with the City Attorney’s Office regarding impacts of grant projects and will coordinate with Public Works and Community Development around any mural or public art events that are supported using the Municipal Art Fund.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Funds are appropriated and available in the Municipal Art Fund.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution

1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE ANNUAL

PUBLIC ART UPDATE AND AUTHORIZING AND APPROPRIATING THE USE OF

MUNICIPAL ART FUNDS

WHEREAS, the Public Art Commission prepared the Annual Public Arts Plan for fiscal year 2023-2024 and includes specific activities that promotes public art and recommends the release of funds from the Municipal Art Fund to cover the costs of the activities described in the annual plan.

WHEREAS, the Public Arts Commission unanimously voted to accept the Annual Public Art Plan and recommend that the City Council authorize the release of an amount up to $8,000 from the Municipal Art Fund in FY 2024; and

WHEREAS, seven thousand five hundred dollars would go to support new or existing cultural performing art events in Salinas by offering matching grants (in -kind match allowed) of up to two thousand five hundred dollars. Up to five hundred dollars will be used for marketing the Public Art Commission meetings, Public Art Master Plan projects, vacant commissioner seats and the grant opportunity;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Salinas City Council accepts and approves the Annual Public Art Plan and authorize use and appropriation of up to $8,000 from the Municipal Art Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-2024; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby authorizes the Library and Community Services Department to design and administer the Public Art cultural event grant opportunity.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

________________________
2 Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-093, Version: 1
Request for Blue Zone at 1224 Hawaii Place
Approve a Resolution denying the request for one (1) blue accessible zone designation at 1224 Hawaii Place.

City of Salinas Printed on 3/16/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: MARCH 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS, TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DIVISION FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: ANDREW EASTERLING, TRAFFIC ENGINEER
TITLE: REQUEST FOR BLUE ZONE AT 1224 HAWAII PLACE

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to deny the request for one (1) blue accessible zone designation at 1224 Hawaii Place.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Public Works staff received an application for one (1) blue zone at 1224 Hawaii Place. While California law allows for exclusive parking for disabled persons via a blue curb marking, the City of Salinas established a policy for considering blue curb marking requests. The request received does not meet the City’s policy, and therefore staff cannot recommend the approval of the request to install one (1) blue zone designation at 1224 Hawaii Place. However, at its meeting on February 9, 2023, the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommended an alternative motion from staff recommendation. The Traffic and Transportation Commission ’s recommended motion is to approve the request for one (1) blue accessible zone designation at 1224 Hawaii Place.

The City Council could therefore choose to:
1) deny the request for one blue accessible zone designation; or 2) approve the request for one blue accessible zone designation (though this action would be inconsistent with the City’s existing policy); or
3) approve the request for one blue accessible zone designation and request staff to review the blue curb marking policy to better accommodate disabled residents BACKGROUND:

Staff received a request from Victor Z. Worden, resident of 1224 Hawaii Place, to install one (1) blue zone designation on Hawaii Place. Mr. Worden states he and his wife have a hard time with getting in and out of the car when parked in the driveway. In addition , Mr. Worden commented that their neighbors park their vehicles along the frontage of their home for long periods, making Page | 2
on-street parking difficult.

California law provides special privileges to persons with disabilities who drive including parking spaces identified with blue curb parking for exclusive use by people with disabilities (California Vehicle Code, §21458(a)(5) ), or parking on designated cur b markings for extended periods of time, including metered parking without paying.

To better regulate blue curb markings, the City of Salinas established a policy for the consideration of blue curb markings, Resolution No. 19056, effective August 15, 2006 . The City’s policy established the following criteria:

1. Off-street parking facilities for the residential property do not exist. The property does not have a garage, driveway, or other on-site parking space that can be provided for the disabled member of the household; or

2. On-street parking is unavailable. This criterion requires that the site be located adjacent to a school, apartment, and/or other businesses that consume on -street residential parking supply; and

3. The path of travel from the proposed on-street parking stall to the home meets ADA/Title 24 path of travel requirements.

The following criteria are required in all cases:

4. Proof that the disabled resident has a permanent disabled placard on file; and

5. Signed statement acknowledging applica nt understands that the on -street disabled parking requested can be used by other residents in the community that have a disabled placard.

Staff has reviewed Mr. Worden’s request based on the policy criteria and determined it does not meet the City’s policy. The residence at 1224 Hawaii Place has a garage and paved driveway which provide direct access to the home. The on-street parking is farther from the home and provides a less direct path of travel between the vehicle and the home. While the site is not near a school or apartment complex, parking availability appears minimal at times. Installation of the disabled parking would further limit pa rking to the general public. ADA accessible parking stalls are required to have an accessible path of travel to the building. Field measures were taken and it was determined that the driveway does not provide an ADA accessible path of travel between the on - street parking to the sidewalk and the home. Also, there is no ADA -compliant curb ramp along this street to provide the required access to the sidewalk.

Consequently, staff cannot recommend the approval of the blue zone request at 1224 Hawaii Place.

Page | 3

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION:

Staff’s recommendation to deny the request for one (1) blue accessible zone designation at 1224 Hawaii Place was presented to the Commission at its February 9, 2023, meeting. The Commission voted (2-4) against staff r ecommendations. Then Commissioner Quigley made an alternative motion to approve the request for one (1) blue accessible zone designation at 1224 Hawaii Place.

The Commission voted on the alternative motion (3-3) to recommend City Council to approve the request for one (1) blue accessible zone designation at 1224 Hawaii Place. Commissioners Canseco, Hernandez and Quigley voted in support of the alternative recommendation and Commissioners Howell, Davis, and Cox voted against the alternative recommend ation. The District 4 appointment is currently vacant.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This recommendation does not meet current City Council initiatives.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The estimated cost to install one (1) blue zone designation is $870. The applicant did not submit funds to cover the cost of installation and processing.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Attachment 1 - Location Map
Attachment 2 - Location Photos
Attachment 3 - Flowchart for Salinas Accessible (Blue) Parking Zones Attachment 4 - Special Curb Marking Application
Attachment 5 - Resolution No. 19056 - Disabled (Blue) Parking Zones on Residential Streets Policy

1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL DENYING THE REQUEST FOR ONE (1) BLUE ACCESSIBLE ZONE AT 1224 HAWAII PLACE

WHEREAS, at its August 15, 2006 , meeting, City Council adopted the City of Salinas Disabled (Blue) Parking Zones on Residential Streets Policy that provided a uniform process for the recommendation of on-street disabled parking (Resolution No. 19056); and

WHEREAS, on December 20, 2022, City Staff received a written request to install a blue accessible zone at 1224 Hawaii Place; and

WHEREAS, staff’s recommended motion presented to the Traffic and Transportation Commission was to deny the request for one (1) blue accessible designation zone since it does not meet the requirements of the City of Salinas Disabled (Blue) Parking Zones on Residential Streets Policy; and

WHEREAS, at its February 9, 2023, meeting, the Traffic and Transportation Commission voted 2-4 to recommend to City Council to support of City staff’s recommendation to deny the request for a blue accessible zone at 1224 Hawaii Place; and

WHEREAS, at its February 9, 2023, meeting, the Traffic and Transportation Commission voted 3-3 on an alternative motion to recommend to City Council to not support of City staff’s recommendation to deny the request for a blue accessible zone at 1224 Hawaii Place; and

WHEREAS, the Traffic and Transportation Commission voted 3-3 on at its February meeting to approve the request for one (1) blue accessible designation zone at 1224 Hawaii Place.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby denies the request for one (1) blue accessible zone at 1224 Hawaii Place.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
2 ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

SALINAS

CALIFORNIA
N
24'REQUESTEDBLUE ZONEHAWAII PLACECARIBBEAN AVENUETAHITI PLACE 1224
REQUESTED BLUE ZONE1224 HAWAII PLACE
1224 HAWAII PLACE

LOCATION PHOTOS

City staff receives
a request f or a
Accessible (Blue)
Parking Zones
Staff visits site to
gather data
Flowchart for Salinas Accessible (Blue) Parking Zones on Residential Streets Policy
Adequate for Accessible Use?
(1) Adequate # of Parking Spaces
(2) # of Cars for AccessibleDrivers
No
Deny Blue
Zone
Yes Yes
No
Yes
Adequate for Accessible Use?
(1) Adequate Space?
(2) # of Cars for Accessible
Drivers
(3) Path of Travel
-Slope
-Width
-Other Barriers
Deny Blue
Zone
Yes
No
No
Availability of Parking?
(1) Reasonable to expect an
available Parking Space?
Deny Blue
Zone
Yes
No
Path of Travel O.K?
(ADA/Title 24)
Deny Blue
Zone
No
Yes
Recommend
Installation of
Blue Zone to
T&TC/Council
All installation recommendations will require:
(1) Permanent Placard
(2) Signed acknowledgement that approved
Blue Zone is for Public use
Garage exists on
Site?
Driveway exists
on Site?
Street
Configuration

EXHIBIT B
1 CITY OF SALINAS
Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division 200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, CA, 93901
(831)758-7241 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. M-F
https://www.cityofsalinas.org/

SPECIAL PARKING RESTRICTIONS REQUEST FORM
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE APPLICANT: Fill out this request form completely. Sign, date and return this form to 200 Lincoln Ave, Salinas, CA, 93901 Attn: Public Works to begin processing. Please include the appropriate fees for the requested curb marking(s). For questions, please contact the Public Works Department (831)758-7241.

Applicant Information
Full Name: Date:

Last First M.I.

Name of
Establishment:

Curb Marking Request Information

1. Type of curb marking or parking restriction you are applying for:

Green 20-Min Yellow White Blue 90-Min 1-Hour 2-Hour

2. Length of Zone Requested (feet): ___________________________ ____________________________________

3. Have you applied for a similar curb marking at your establis hment before (check one): Yes No If yes, date of last application: ________________________________________________________________

4. Are there any existing parking restrictions near your establ ishment? (check one): Yes No If yes, please provide the number of parking stalls and location (address): _____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________

5. Description of your business or property: __________________ ________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________

6. Business hours and days (if applicable):____________________ ________________________________________

7. How long has your business been located at this address? ___ __________________________________________

8. Do you own or lease the premise? For how long? _____________ _______________________________________

9. For Yellow Zones:
a. Number of pick-ups /deliveries daily: ______________________ _________________________________ b. Typical size and type of truck: ____________________________ ________________________________ c. Estimated times of highest usage: __________________________ _______________________________

Address:

Street Address Suite/Unit #

City State ZIP Code
Phone: Email:
2 For White or Green Zones:
a. Estimated number of visitors daily: ________________________ _________________________________ b. Estimated time clients/patrons spend at your establishment: _____________________________________ c. Estimated times of highest usage: __________________________ _______________________________ For Blue Zones (Business):
a. Estimated number of disabled persons visiting premises daily : ___________________________________ b. Estimated times of highest usage: __________________________ _______________________________ For Blue Zones (Residential):
a. Does a garage or driveway exist on site? (check one): Yes No b. No. of disabled persons in the household: __________________ _________________________________ For White, 20-Min Green Zones, 90-Min, 1-Hour and 2-Hour Parking:
a. Estimated number of visitors daily:_________________________ ________________________________ b. Estimated time clients/patrons spend at your establishment:_ ____________________________________ c. Estimated times of highest parking usage:___________________ ________________________________ d. Number of employees:________________________________________ ___________________________ e. Do your employees use any of off-street spaces? ____________ _________________________________ f. How many off-street parking spaces do you provide? _________ _________________________________ g. Is your establishment within 300ft of a municipal off-street parking facility? (check one): Yes No

10. Is there support from adjacent properties, including suppor t from the Home Owners Association, for installation of the requested curb marking? Can you demonstrate this support if necessary? ______________________________

11. Are there any facilities (churches, schools, shopping malls , office complexes, etc.) in the area that affect the availability of parking or loading at this location? _____________________________________________________ Fees
Please make all checks payable to CITY OF SALINAS (Account No. 1000.50.5122-56.5060).

New Curb Marking Fee (per establishment) : $865.50
Annual Renewal Fee (per establishment):

Due June 30th of every year $301.50
Disclaimer and Signature
I certify that my answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge.

I understand that such curb marking(s) reduce the availability of on-street parking space to the general public and appropriate information is provided on the bottom of this application to assist commissioners in determining the justification for altering the present use of the curb. I understand this curb marking(s) request is not a reserved space for my personal use or place of business and parking enforcement for curb markings are generally done on an on-call basis. Also, I understand that special curb markings are all subject to removal by City Staff at any time for the purpose of safety and public use.

I also understand that if this application is approved, a fee of $865.50 must be paid for the installation of the curb marking(s), and that an annual $301.50 renewal fee for the parking stall(s) will be paid June 30th of every year.

The approval of my curb marking request form is subject to review by City Staff. The curb markings becomes invalid in the event I vacate the premises or the nature of the business at the premise changes.

All curb marking requests will be presented to the Traffic & Transportation Commission and City Council for approval. Should my request be denied, my fee will be refunded.

Signature: Date:

The City of Salinas
Disabled (Blue) Parking Zones on Residential Streets Policy

Policy adopted on August 15, 2006 . Resolution No. 19056

To be consistent with appropriate use of special curb ma rkings and in response to increasing requests for on -street disabled zones in residential areas, the City has approved policy with criteria for when to install disabled (blue) parking zones on residential streets. More specifically, this policy restric ts the installation of these disabled zones to specific locations meeting the criteria below.

The City of Salinas is committed to the installation of the pedestrian facilities that improve accessibility for disabled members of the community. At reside ntial areas, off -street parking (such as a garage or driveway adjacent to the house) locations provide the most convenience and safety for those requiring disabled access to a house.

The policy below intends to ensure that disabled parking on residential streets are installed where they are most needed and that residents who are disabled have safe and convenient access to their homes from their vehicles.

I. Application. In order to receive consideration under this policy, an applicant must submit a writt en request to the City of Salinas Development and Engineering Services Department, ATTN: Traffic Section, 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, California 93901.

II. Consideration. Effective on the adoption of this policy, requests for on -street disabled parking (blue) zones shall be subject to the following criteria:

1. Off-street parking facilities for the residential prope rty do not exist . The property does not have a garage, driveway, or other on -site parking space that can be provided for the disabled member of the household; or

2. On-street parking is unavailable. This criterion requires that the site be located adjacent to a school, apartment, and/or other businesses that consume on-street residential parking supply; and

3. The path of travel from the proposed on-street parking stall to the home meets ADA/Title 24 path of travel requirements.

The following criteria are required in all cases.

4. Proof that the disabled resident has a permanent disabled placard on file; and

EXHIBIT A

5. Signed statement acknowledging applicant understands that the on -street disabled parking request ed can be used by other residents in the community that have a disabled placard.

This Policy provides a uniform process for the recommendation of an on -street disabled parking zone.

The City Engineer, at his or her discretion, may examine other consi derations not part of this Policy’s criteria. Results of these considerations may become the basis to support or oppose recommendation resulting from previously considered criteria.

III. Commission Consideration City staff will bring its recommendation to the Traffic and Transportation Commission (T&TC). The meeting of the T&TC provides a public forum for the applicant or any impacted party to support or protest City staff’s recommendation. The Traffic and Transportation Commission may recommend approval or denial of the applicant’s request based on the criteria above for Disabled (Blue) Parking Zones on residential streets.

IV. Council Consideration. The City Council makes the final decision regarding the request for Disabled (Blue) Parking Zones on residential streets . The meeting of the City Council provides another public forum to appeal decisions of the T&TC made following the application of this policy.

V. The City E ngineer, at his or her discretion, may re move any Disabled (Blue) Parking Zone if it is no longer needed (e.g., when resident has moved , when the situation no longer meets the above criteria, etc.).

I:\PWTra\Reports to Traffic and Transportation Commission\Disabled Zone (Blue)\Disabled Parking (Blue) Zones at Residential Streets.doc

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-203, Version: 1
a. Existing Litigation - California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding, Betty Wilder v. City of Salinas, Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 22CV000763 b. Existing Litigation - California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding, Jesse Gilpas v. City of Salinas, Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 22CV001407 c. Pending Litigation - California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding, Santa Rita Union High School District, et al. v. City of Salinas et al., Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 20CV000242.
d. Pending Litigation - California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), conference with legal counsel regarding, Alisal Union School District, et al. v. City of Salinas, et al., Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 20CV00340.
e. Real Property Negotiations - California Government Code Section 54956.8, conference with real property negotiators City Manager Steven S. Carrigan, City Attorney Christopher A. Callihan, Community Development Director Megan Hunter, and Assistant Community Development Director Lisa Brinton, to discuss the terms and sale of real properties located at 219 Salinas Street (APN 002242029000, Parking Lot 1); 210 Salinas Street (APN TNPAPN 000142, Parking Lot 8); 122 Lincoln Avenue (APN 002245008000, Parking Lot 12), 128 Lincoln Avenue (APN 002245007000, Parking Lot 12), 118 Lincoln Avenue (APN 002245005000, Parking Lot 12), 120 Lincoln Avenue (APN 0022458006000, Parking Lot 12), 112 Lincoln Avenue (APN 002245004000, Parking Lot 12).

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-151, Version: 2
2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report and Visión Salinas 2040 Update Approve a Resolution accepting the 2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report (GP APR) and authorizing its submittal to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR).

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: MARCH 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FROM: MEGAN HUNTER, DIRECTOR
THROUGH: LISA BRINTON, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

GRANT LEONARD, PLANNING MANAGER

BY: JONATHAN MOORE, SENIOR PLANNER

TITLE: 2022 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT AND
VISIÓN SALINAS 2040 UPDATE

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a resolution accepting the 2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report (GP APR) and authoriz ing its submittal to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Sections 65400 and 65700 of the California Government Code mandates that all cities and counties submit an annual report on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation to their legislative bodies, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the Housing and Community Development (HCD) by April 1st of each year. This report covers Salinas General Plan (2002) implementation activities during the calendar year 2022. General Plan Update (GPU) engagement also continued in 2022 with twelve workshop/working group meetings, a transportation survey, and direct farmwork er engagement with the Center for Community Advocacy (CCA). During the last calendar year, it was determined that given the increased complexity of the Housing Element process, the Housing Element update would have to run ahead of the rest of the GPU to meet the statutory deadline of December 15, 2023.

BACKGROUND:

General Plan Annual Progress Report Requirements

Under California Government Code Section 65400, staff is required to prepare a General Plan Annual Progress Report (GP APR) for review by the City Council and submittal to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and Department of Housing and Community Development Page | 2

(HCD) by April 1st of each year. Failure to submit the report within sixty (60) days of the deadline would make the City ineligible for certain State grant programs.

Visión Salinas 2040 General Plan Update

The City launched the General Plan Update (GPU), Visión Salinas 2040, which will also include a new Environmental Justice Element and the City’s first Climate Action Plan (CAP), in the summer of 2021. In 2021, the City launched engagement with seven (7) land use workshops. In 2022 General Plan engagement covered a variety of topics in multiple formats. The topics of existing conditions, climate action, community design (including land use and transportation), and environmental justice were cover ed in five community workshops/webinars. The City also conducted seven Working Group meetings, diving deeper with residents into topics such as housing, wate r, and economic development. More details and meeting notes are available in Attachment 3, General Plan Update 2022 Community Meeting Summaries. Through a Sustainable Agricultural Land Conservation (SALC) Planning Grant, the City is also partnering with the Center for Community Advocacy (CCA) to deepen grassroots outreach. Last year CCA made two outreach visits to local farm fields and recruited 10 General Plan Ambassadors.

DISCUSSION:

2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report

The 2022 GP APR (Attachment 4) contains two sections. Section 1 provides an introduction and summary for the GP APR, gives a background of our existing General Plan and a synopsis of key legislation since its adoption that will be addressed through the GPU . It also gives a summary of the GPU and coordination with regional planning efforts. Section 2 describes projects occurring during the 2022 calendar year that furthered current General Plan goals and policies. Below is a list of some of the GP APR implementation highlights. Each item is described in more detail in the report and linked to the General Plan goal/policy it implements.  Completed the transfer of Intermodal Transit Center properties to the City.  Received over $4 million in grant funding from Caltrans for public art, signage, greenery, pedestrian amenities, and other improvements along the East Alisal Street Corridor.  Updated existing and entered into new Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with the County of Monterey for master planning government-owned property, affordable housing, trail networks, expanding access to health and mental health services, and planning activities to determine the feasibility of a City/County joint parking facility.  Created pre-approved plan sets for Accessory Dwelling Units to reduce development costs and encourage new housing.
 Selected design consultants for a new Hebbron Family Center and for park revitalization and improvement projects.
 Awarded $4.5 million contract for citywide sidewalk repairs, including $3.7 million in ARPA funds.
 Accepted the Safe Routes to School plan as a strategic planning document for community- identified needs to support walking, cycling, carpooling, and safety measures for 45 schools in Salinas.

Page | 3

 Received a $3.4 million dollar California Violence In tervention and Prevention Grant to fund community-based programs.
 Started the preparation of a Salinas Fire Department Master Plan.

Staff also presented the Draft GP APR to the Visión Salinas 2040 Steering Committee on February 21st and to the Planning Commission on March 1st. No public comment was received on the draft document at these meetings. Neither body recommended changes to the Draft GP APR prior to submittal. Planning Commission approved a resolution recommending acceptance of the Draft GP APR and submittal to the appropriate state agencies. Staff will present the Draft GP APR to the Housing and Land Use Committee (HLUC) on March 14 th, which is after the submission of this report. Any comments received at the HLUC will be incorporated into staff’s presentation to City Council.

Visión Salinas 2040 Update

In early 2023, deeper discussions on public safety and housing will be paramount to address Council and legislative priorities. The City is approaching its statutory deadline to complete its 6th Cycle Housing Element update by December 15 th, 2023. Housing Element and housing -related laws have changed significantly since the last update in 2015. This deadline and increased complexity create the need for the Housing Element to be prepared ahead of the rest of the General Plan Update.

6th Cycle Housing Element 2023-2031

The City of Salinas’ current Housing Element (2015-2023) was adopted in 2015 and was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) as complying with State law. Because the current Housing Element expires at the end of 2023, the City is required to adopt an updated Housing Element by December 15 th. This sixth cycle update of the Housing Element will cover the planning period of December 31, 2023, through December 31, 2031. The Housing Element consists of six (6) sections that that address different aspects of housing within Salinas. Those sections are:

 Introduction/Overview  Housing Constraints
 Community Participation  Housing Resources
 Community Profile/Existing
Conditions
 Housing Plan/Policies

New to the sixth cycle Housing Element is an analysis of ways to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing. The goal of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) is to combat housing discrimination, eliminate racial bias, undo historic patterns of segregation, and lift barriers that restrict access in order to foster inclusive communities and achieve racial equity, fair housing choice, and opportunity for all Californians.

To be able to meet the De cember 15 th deadline and ensure technical accuracy, the City has partnered with Veronica Tam and Associates to provide technical support services for the Housing Element update. Veronica Tam and Associates (VTA) previously partnered with the City on the Page | 4

adopted 2015-2023 Housing Element , VTA brings extensive knowledge about drafting housing elements from work performed statewide.

Public participation will be key to writing a successful Housing Element update. The City has actively engaged the community on the subject of housing since the adoption of the 2015-2023 Housing Element, with housing being a major topic of discussion in the City’s recent planning efforts, such as the Alisal Vibrancy Plan, the Chinatown Revitalization Plan, and Visión Salinas 2040. The City began formal Housing Element public engagement with an online Housing Element workshop on February 9, 2023. The City anticipates conducting continued public engagement throughout 2023.

The schedule for the Housing Element Update is:
 July 2022 – February 2023: Selection of consultant, data collection and analysis, public engagement
 March – May 2023: Continued public engagement and drafting of the Housing Element update
 May – June 2023: Release of draft Housing Element update for public review an d comment
 June – September 2023: Review of draft Housing Element update by California Department of Housing and Community Development
 September – November 2023: Revisions to draft Housing Element update as needed  November – December 2023: Release of final Housing Element for public and Planning Commission review
 December 5, 2023: Council consideration of adoption of Housing Element  Submission of 2023-2031 Housing Element to California Department of Housing and Community Development for certification

Next Steps

Along with housing, Council, as well as the General Plan Steering Committee, has expressed interest in expanding the General Plan’s view of public safety . Significant capacity will be dedicated to releasing the public draft Housing Element. The re are also several work products in development that will help the City reach the next stage of General Plan development and community engagement. These include finalizing an Existing Conditions Report and buildout projections for proposed Place Type land use. Buildout projections will allow the City to complete technical studies including traffic impact analysis, emissions forecasting for the CAP and a Water Supply Assessment.

DEPARTMENT COORDINATION:

Although the development of this report was led by Community Development, it is expected that all departments, the City Council and Commissions will be involved in the General Plan Update.

The GPU will also require significant coordination with regional agencies, including but not limited to, the County o f Monterey, Monterey -Salinas Transit, the Transportation Agency for Monterey County, and the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments.

Page | 5

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The proposed action of accepting the GP APR and the administrative report on the GPU is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Guidelines Section 15378. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent d iscretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability. An Environmental Impact Report will be prepared for the General Plan.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Given that the General Plan acts as the City’s guiding document for future growth and development, it will help meet all City Council Strategic Goals. However, the current work around the General Plan Update is specifically reflected as an objective under Effective and Culturally Responsive Government.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

This report has no direct fiscal impact to submit the APR.

When completed, it is anticipated that the current General Plan process will cost approximately $3.4 million dollars. The City currently has approximately $2.6 million for this effort in the CIP (9701) budget with the balance coming from grants including the Local and Regional Early Action entitlement grants and the Sustainable Agricultural Land Conservation grant.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution accepting the 2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report 2) Draft 2022 City of Salinas General Plan APR
3) General Plan Update 2022 Community Meeting Summaries RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2022 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS

REPORT AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas (City) adopted the Salinas General Plan in 2002; and

WHEREAS, as of 2019, Section 65400 of the California Government Code requires the City to file an annual report addressing the status of the General Plan progress made toward implementing its goals and policies; and

WHEREAS, a General Plan Annual Progress Report for 2022 (GP APR) was prepared and must be submitted to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) by April 1, 2023; and

WHEREAS, on March 1, 202 3, the Planning Commission received and had the opportunity to comment on the Draft GP APR and recommended no changes prior to submittal ; and

WHEREAS, on March 21, 2023, the City Council held a public meeting to review the 2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report and confirmed that the 2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report accurately reflects the City’s progress in implementing the goals and policies of the 2002 General Plan; and

WHEREAS, the acceptance of the 2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report is not a project as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 and, therefore, no environmental assessment is required; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL that the 2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report accurately reflects the City’s progress in implementing the 2002 Salinas General Plan; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council accepts the General Plan 2022 Annual Progress Repo rt and directs staff to submit the subject document to the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development and the Governor’s Office of Research as required by statute.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

1 | Page

2022 Draft City of Salinas General Plan Annual Progress Report

Presented to Salinas City Council March 21, 2023
Accepted by Resolution #

2 | Page

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
 Purpose and Summary
 General Plan Background
 Coordination with Partner Agencies
 Visión Salinas 2040 General Plan Update

2. Status of General Plan Implementation Efforts

1. Introduction
Purpose and Summary
California Government Code 65400 requires cities and counties to submit an Annual Progress Report (APR) on the status of the General Plan and implementation progress to their legislative bodies, the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR), and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) by April 1 of each year. The APR for 2021 was submitted on March 28, 2022.

The City made significant accomplishments related to its General Plan in 2022. Revitalization efforts in the downtown core continued with the approval of the transfer of properties to the City at the Intermodal Transit Center (ITC) for potential redevelopment, and the updating of the Downtown Memorandum of Understanding between the City and County of Monterey to support parking consolidation. The City selected consultants for a new Hebbron Family Center and major park improvements, as well as procured additional maintenance and upgraded services. Major investments were also made in pedestrian safety, with the City awarding a $4.5 million dollar contract for sidewalk repairs citywide. Salinas also received a $3.4 million dollar Intervention and Prevention Grant to fund multiple community‐based youth programs. These accomplishments and more are detailed in Section 2.

Status of General Plan Implementation Efforts below.

While the Housing Element is the subject of its own Annual Progress Report, housing is one of the City’s top priorities, and a summary of General Plan efforts would be incomplete without some description of housing progress. In the past year, Salinas became the first Central Coast city to submit an application to the Prohousing Designation Program, released pre‐approved plans for Accessory Dwelling Units, and is one of ten California jurisdictions awarded a Family Homelessness Challenge Grant.

3 | Page

General Plan Background
The City’s existing General Plan was adopted in 2002 and contains eight (8) Elements: Land Use, Community Design, Housing (updated in 2015), Conservation/Open Space, Circulation, Safety, Noise, and Economic Development (adopted in 2017). In several ways this General Plan was ahead of its time, with a vision that called for a compact city form, high quality mixed use and infill development, and preservation of agricultural land. Still, much has changed in Salinas since the Plan was initiated in 1998. Salinas is acutely impacted by the statewide housing crisis and its population is projected to continue to grow for several decades. New state laws have also significantly altered the planning landscape. These legislative changes are focused primarily on increasing housing production and addressing  climate  change  through  reducing  greenhouse  gas  emissions  and  developing  adaptation  measures.  Several of  the most important recent changes that the General Plan should consider or will have to directly address are summarized below:
 AB 32 (2006) ‐ the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 required the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop a Scoping Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) to 1990 levels by 2000. Subsequent Scoping Plans have added reduction targets of 40 percent from 1990 levels by 2030 and 80 percent below 1985 levels by 2045.  AB 1358 (2008) – the Complete Streets Act of 2008 requires cities and counties to modify their circulation elements to plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets all users’ needs for safe and convenient travel.  SB 743 (2013) ‐ removes automobile delay and congestion (level of service) as basis for determining significant transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).  SB 379 (2015) ‐ requires general plan safety elements to include a climate change vulnerability assessment and address adaptation.
 SB 1000 (2016) ‐ requires the creation of an environmental justice element to reduce the unique or compounded health risks in disadvantaged communities.
 AB 686 (2018) – requires jurisdictions to affirmatively further fair housing and adds new requirements for Housing Elements.  SB 330 (2019) – the Housing Crisis Act created procedural protections for large housing developments, including limiting certain fee increases, the number of hearings that can be held, and downzoning.  AB 68 (2019) ‐ this bill allows for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) and junior ADU where certain criteria are met, prohibits minimum lot sizes for ADU, and identifies opportunities for ADUs in multifamily buildings where building standards are met.  AB 671 (2019) ‐ requires local governments to include plans to incentivize and promote affordable ADUs in their housing elements.

4 | Page

 SB 6 (2019) ‐ requires local governments preparing a housing element on or after January 1, 2021, to submit an inventory of land suitable for residential development.
 SB 9 (2021) – Allows for two duplex housing units where one housing unit was allowed before and waives discretionary review and public hearings for these developments. A proposed project cannot result in the demolition or alteration of a building that currently has a tenant or has had a tenant in the last three years.  SB 10 (2021) – Creates a voluntary process for local governments to pass ordinances prior to January 1, 2029, to zone any parcel for up to ten (10) residential units if located in transit rich areas and urban infill sites.

Through the General Plan Update the City can address these and other legislative changes and chart a resilient vision for housing the entire community, creating a sustainable future, and equitable recovery from the pandemic.

Visión Salinas 2040

The City launched the General Plan Update, Visión Salinas 2040, which will also include a new Environmental Justice Element and the City’s first Climate Action Plan (CAP), in the summer of 2021. Engagement continued in 2022 with workshops, meetings, webinars, pop‐ups, surveys, and other activities. All events/materials had interpretation/Spanish translations. Specific events included:

 Existing Conditions Workshop/Working Group Kickoff – Online webinar/workshop presenting existing conditions and working group topics before splitting into breakout groups.
 Working Group Meetings – Seven online and in‐person General Plan topic‐specific meetings with residents and topic experts.  CAP Workshop – Kick‐off activity for the Climate Action Plan, this webinar/workshop discussed the community’s greenhouse gas emissions and areas/populations most vulnerable to climate change impacts.  Community Design Workshop – This webinar focused on the proposed shift from traditional land use and street classifications to more form/place‐based options.
 Transportation  Survey  –  Nearly  400  respondents  completed  this  survey  on  top  transportation  challenges  and  priorities  in Salinas.
 Environmental Justice Workshops – The City held two in‐person workshops for their first Environmental Justice Element, one led in English, one in Spanish (both had interpretation options).

5 | Page

 Farmworker Outreach – The City is partnering with the Center for Community Advocacy (CCA) to increase the grassroots reach of General Plan engagement, particularly to the farmworker community. In 2022, CCA made two outreach visits to local farm fields, and recruited 10 General Plan ambassadors.

Coordination with Regional Planning Efforts

In addition to Visión Salinas 2040, in 2022 the City worked with partner organizations on multiple regional planning efforts, including:
 Monterey‐Salinas Transit’s (MST) Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Study – the Community Development and Public Works Departments are collaborating with MST and other jurisdictions on a grant to study the potential for TOD along possible Bus Rapid Transit Corridors. Staff helped review the initial grant application, refined study areas, provided background information, and continues to participate in meetings to develop the final study.  Draft 6th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Methodology ‐  The City worked closely with AMBAG and housing partners on the draft Methodology, successfully advocating for equity as core component.  Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP). The Fire Department led coordination with the Monterey County Office of  Emergency  Services  (OES)  on  the  MJHMP  update,  which  also  included  Administration,  Public  Works,  and  Community Development. This update, adopted in 2022, includes vulnerability analysis for climate change hazards, new Salinas‐specific climate problem statements, and climate adaptation actions.

2. Status of General Plan Implementation Efforts
2022
Element  Projects and Accomplishments  Implemented Goals/Polices Land Use
/Community
Design

 City Council approved the transfer of properties from the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) at the Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC). The transfer was completed in December, 2022. Next, city staff will prepare a Master Plan that may include Transit Oriented Development (TOD).  The City and County of Monterey updated their Downtown Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in March, 2022, focusing on housing, safety, and mobility in the downtown, along with planning and assessing the feasibility of a government center parking facility.

Goal‐LU‐1: Develop a balanced
land use pattern that provides
a wide range of jobs, housing,
shopping, services, and
recreation.

Policy‐LU‐1.2: provide a plan
for land uses that includes the
capacity to accommodate

6 | Page

2022
Element  Projects and Accomplishments  Implemented Goals/Polices  The City continues upzoning opportunity sites to mixed‐use and higher density housing designations via an SB‐2 grant ahead of the General Plan Update. These sites are on or near major transit corridors and opportunity sites, including downtown and the ITC, and along East Alisal and North Main Streets. All SB‐2 rezones are expected to be complete in 2023.
 Created draft Place Types to replace current land use designations in the General Plan Update. These increase the areas designated for mixed use and allow for more housing density, especially along major corridors.  In April 2022, Caltrans awarded City $4M; $1.87M from the Clean California State Beautification Program and $2.15M from the Local Grant Program to further address Alisal community’s short‐term goals of appearance, cleanliness, and safety/infrastructure along Alisal Street Corridor. Improvements include public art, banners, signage, trees, and pedestrian amenities.  City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) in October seeking a consultant team to create an Alisal District Identity Master Plan.  In November 2022, the City and County of Monterey entered into the Alisal MOU focused on 1) master planning the development of City and County ‐owned property, with a primary focus on affordable housing, 2) establishing a trail network connecting City and County facilities and amenities, and 3) the expansion of health and mental health services in the Alisal.  Relocated the Sun Street Transfer Station to Madison Lane, removing a waste transfer facility from the center of the city and opening up the area for long‐term redevelopment.
 Started an Urban Forestry Master Plan
 Over 4,600 permits (commercial, residential, etc.) issued and 13,799 building inspections conducted.
growth projected for 2020 and
beyond.

Goal‐CD‐1: Create and preserve
a positive community image
and identity.

Policy‐CD‐1.4: Use landscaping,
design
schemes, and signing to
improve the image and distinct
identity of the city, its
neighborhoods, and its major
gateways.

Goal‐ CD‐3: Create a
community that promotes a
pedestrian‐friendly, livable
environment.

Policy‐CD‐3.5: Promote high‐
density residential
development and mixed‐use in
the Central City.

Policy‐ CD‐3.8: Promote the
use of alternative modes of
transportation, including bus,
rial, bicycling and walking.

Housing   See 2022 Housing Element Annual Progress Report Conservation/
Open Space
 Selected design consultants for Hebbron Family Center Revitalization Project and the Park Revitalization and Improvement Projects.

Goal‐COS‐7: Provide, develop,
and maintain ample park and

7 | Page

2022
Element  Projects and Accomplishments  Implemented Goals/Polices  Make A Difference Day October 2022 hosted hundreds of volunteers for clean‐ ups at Azahel Cruz Park, Laurel Heights Park and Cesar Chavez Park.  Earth Day April 2022 drew hundreds of volunteers to remove invasive growth from the grove of trees in Sherwood Park.
 Camp Amor Salinas hosted 35 high school aged volunteers for one week to clean the stage and picnic tables as well as repaint the trash cans at Sherwood Park.  The City released a Request for Qualifications and selected consultants for Project and  Construction  Management  for  a  series  of  projects  including,  Closter  Park Improvements,  Cesar  Chavez  Trail,  El  Gabilan  Play  Lot  and  new  inclusive Playgrounds at Northgate and Williams Ranch parks.
 The City entered into contracts with Jet Mulch and two playground manufacturers for resurfacing and repairs citywide.
 In  May  2022,  the  Salinas  City  Council  approved  a  Services  Agreement  with McLaughlin for the painting of Recreation Facilities (Breadbox, El Dorado, Closter).

In addition, painting, new flooring, and HVAC repairs are underway at the Salinas Aquatic Center. HVAC repairs/replacements are also underway at the El Dorado Park Community Center.

recreational facilities that offer
a variety of recreational
activities.

Policy‐ COS‐7.8: While
supporting
the development of
private recreational facilities,
ensure that the supply and
maintenance of public parks
and recreational opportunities
is adequate to ensure
permanent availability of parks
and recreational facilities for
use by the entire community.

Circulation
 Awarded a contract for sidewalk repairs citywide for $4.5 million, including $3.7 million in ARPA funds.
 Constructed  Safe  Routes  to  School  improvements  at  Bardin  Elementary,  to  be completed in early 2023.
 Completed a $900,000 chip seal project repairing roads.  Working with Monterey‐Salinas Transit (MST) on a grant to study regional Transit Oriented  Development  (TOD),  including  the  Alisal  Street  Corridor.  Staff  has worked  with  MST  throughout,  including  reviewing  the  application,  refining  the study area, and providing background information.

Goal C‐1: provide and maintain
a circulation system that meets
the current and future needs of
the community.

Goal‐C‐2: Work with other local
and regional agencies to
develop regional transit and
transportation systems.

Goal‐C‐3: Promote an efficient
public transportation network.

8 | Page

2022
Element  Projects and Accomplishments  Implemented Goals/Polices  Accepted  the  Safe  Routes  to  School  Plan  as  a  strategic  planning  document  in December  2022.  This  document  describes  community  identified‐needs  and recommendations to support walking, cycling, carpooling, and safety measures for 45 schools in Salinas.
 Updated the 2019 Greenhouse Gas Inventory with origin‐destination VMT data to establish a baseline for the Climate Action Plan. Conducted the first Climate Action Plan Workshop in May 2022.
 Conducted  a  Transportation  Needs  survey  for  the  General  Plan  Update  that received nearly 400 responses.

Goal C‐4: Provide an extensive,
safe public bicycle network that
provides  on‐street  as  well  as
off‐street facilities.

Goal C‐5: Provide safe routes to
school,  work,  shopping,  ad
recreation for pedestrians.

Policy‐C‐5.1: Increase
availability of safe and well‐
maintained sidewalks in all
areas of the City.

Safety   Started the preparation of a Salinas Fire Department Master Plan.  Hosted and organized the first annual Salinas March for Peace in the Alisal, drawing hundreds of residents.
o Received a $3.4 million dollar California Violence Intervention and Prevention Grant that will fund:
o Salinas Police Department Juvenile Diversion program and a new Community Outreach Team to include a Sergeant, four officers, and a part‐time analyst.
o Rancho Cielo: Tiny Home construction training program. o Partners for Peace: Parent Education and youth mentoring. o Natividad Foundation: Hospital‐based violence intervention program.  Continued to convene the Community Alliance for Safety and Peace maintaining a broad network of violence prevention and intervention partners to operationalize the strategic plan on Violence Prevention.  Managing the development and implementation of the $300,000 Prevention and Wellness Grant.

Goal S‐1: Continue to play a
central role in the creation and
maintenance of a community
that resolves its problems in
non‐violent ways.

Policy S‐1.3: Support the
development and operation of
community centers and
recreational facilities as a pre‐
emptive strategy to reduce
youth related crime.

Goal S‐5: Improve the
community's ability to respond
effectively to natural and
human‐caused emergencies.

9 | Page

2022
Element  Projects and Accomplishments  Implemented Goals/Polices  Partnered with the County to adopt an updated Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan in September 2022.
 Funding has been allocated for deferred maintenance at all City fire stations and projects are being initiated as staff and oversight resources allow.

Policy S‐5.1: Regularly update
and use the City of Salinas
Multihazard Emergency Plan
for disaster planning, public
education and guidance in
responding to emergencies.

Goal‐LU‐4: Provide effective
and responsive fire protection
and emergency response
service.

Policy‐LU‐4.1: Provide an
effective and responsive level
of fire protection, public
education and emergency
response service (including
facilities, personnel, and
equipment, through the Salinas
Fire Department.

Economic
Development
 Supported Blue Zones and Sustainable Salinas in doing monthly volunteer clean‐ ups in Natividad Creek Park, the Alisal business corridor, Santa Rita Park and old town Salinas.
 The Small Business Hotline has received 136 calls and 96 emails in 2022 from businesses. The Business Navigator has assisted business owners and entrepreneurs with acquiring and renewing business licenses, permitting, referrals to small business support organizations and the promotion of workshops and financial opportunities.
 Continue to convene Small Business and Economic Recovery Taskforce quarterly to coordinate and partner with Salinas Business Community Organizations to provide training and financial support for small businesses and entrepreneurs.

Goal ED‐QL‐2 – Narrow social
and economic disparities in the
City of Salinas to foster a more
inclusive community rich with
diversity, social cohesion, civic
engagement, and sense of
belonging.

Goal ED‐RET‐1.1: Enhance
retail, entertainment, and

10 | Page

2022
Element  Projects and Accomplishments  Implemented Goals/Polices  In October 2022, launched social media and Technology Grant Program to assist businesses with marketing and efficiently operating their business.  In December 2022, launched Downtown Outdoor Dining Program and the Outdoor Dining Forgivable Loan Program to assist downtown eateries with investing in quality outdoor furniture that complements and enhances Downtown revitalization improvements.
 City Council approved the Annual Public Arts Plan in March of 2022 funding $5,000 for matching public art event grants and $1,000 for marketing and outreach of grant and other Public Art Commission (PAC) support. Grant Request For Proposals (RFP) released in October.
 Started an Agriculture Economic Study to develop General Plan Update policy recommendations to support the future of the agriculture industry in Salinas.  Completed EIFD Feasibility Analysis to fund infrastructure improvements required for the future development of the Salinas Ag Industrial Center.

tourism opportunities
throughout the City.

Policy RET 1.2 –
Undertake an
aggressive marketing program
to change the misperception
and false image of Salinas as
being an unsafe place to visit,
live and work.

Goal ED‐EBG‐2 – Ensure that
existing businesses have access
to the resources and services
they need to prosper and
expand in Salinas.

Engagement Activity Summary
January 20th, 2022: Existing
Conditions/Working Group Kick-off
• Online webinar, over 90 participants
• 1st part included presentation reviewing existing
conditions and breakdown of working group topics.
2nd part - meeting was split into 3 breakout groups
(Built Environment, Socioeconomic Systems, Natural
Systems), one for every working group. Participants
had the opportunity to choose one group or to visit
all three. Facilitators asked 3 questions- What stood
out to you? What’s something you want to change?
What other information would you want?
• Meeting notes: Existing Conditions Breakout Notes
February 2022: Working Group
Meetings
Built Environment:
• Online meeting, 40+ participants
• Meeting served as an introduction to the General
Plan Update process. Breakout groups explored
challenges and opportunities related to housing &
land use.
• Meeting notes: Built Environment Meeting #1
March 2022: Working Group
Meetings
Built Environment:
• Online meeting, 20+ participants
• The meeting presentation focused on our current
Housing goals, as well as a policy scan review.

Breakout groups explored current housing priorities,
policy changes, as well as missing topics.
• Meeting notes: Built Environment Meeting #2
Socioeconomic Systems:
• Online meeting, 15+ participants
• The meeting presentation included a short intro to
the General Plan Update and engagement structure,
as well as the topics included in the Socioeconomic
Systems pillar. Breakout groups explored current
Economic Development and Health/Environmental
Justice goals.
• Meeting notes: Socioeconomic Systems Meeting #1
Natural Systems:
• Online meeting, 10+ participants
• The meeting presentation included a short into to the General Plan Update and an intro to the Climate
Action Plan and its connection to the Environmental
Justice Element, as well as a review of the Salinas
greenhouse gas emissions inventory. Group
discussion was focused on areas of interest and
questions related to the GHG inventory.
• Meeting notes: Natural Systems Meeting #1
April 2022: Working Group Meetings Built Environment:
• In person meeting at El Gabilan Library, 10+
participants
• The meeting presentation focused on our current
Circulation Element goals. Group discussion explored
current challenges and opportunities.
• Meeting notes: Built Environment Meeting #3
Socioeconomic Systems:
• In person meeting at El Gabilan Library, 15+
participants
• The meeting presentation included a review of
Economic Development goals discussed in the
previous meeting and an introduction to the
Environmental Justice Element. Group discussion was
focused on potential Environmental Justice goals and
policies.
• Meeting notes: Socioeconomic Systems Meeting #2
Natural Systems:
• In person meeting at El Gabilan Library, 10+
participants
• The meeting presentation focused on water and
water governance, as well as some discussion
pertaining to agriculture and pesticides.
• Meeting notes: Natural Systems Meeting #2
April 28th, 2022: Climate Action Plan
Webinar
• Online webinar, 25+ participants
• The first part of the meeting was a presentation by
consultants from PlaceWorks and served to
introduction the City’s first Climate Action Plan and
the current Vulnerability Assessment. The group
discussions focused on different ways residents can
help reduce emissions in their daily lives.
• Meeting summary: CAP Summary
June 29th, 2022: Community Design
Webinar
• Online webinar, 60+ participants
• Webinar presentation focused on Community Design
and its importance, the shift from traditional Land
Use designations to Place Types as well as Street
Types. The webinar included polling, a Q&A portion,
and raffle prizes for 3 lucky participants.
• Comments and Poll Results
September 28th & 29th, 2022:

Environmental Justice Workshops
• In person workshops, 35+ participants
• 2 workshops- one in English, one in Spanish.
• Workshops explored the City’s current EJ challenges
related to pollution, water quality, and housing. The
breakout portion of the meeting served as a
brainstorm session to discuss community solutions.
• Breakout Group Notes

Salinas City Council
March 21, 2023
Grant Leonard, Planning Manager
General Plan Annual Progress Report
and Visión Salinas 2040 Update

Draft Annual Progress Report Highlights
ADU pre-approved plans
Downtown projects Safe Routes to SchoolAlisal Corridor Grants

Visión Salinas accomplishments – 2022
Engagement Topics
• Existing conditions
• Climate action
• Community design
• Housing
• Land use
• Economic development
• Transportation
• Water
• Environmental justice
• 5 workshops and 7 working
group meetings
• Direct farmworker engagement
and outreach support
• Transportation Survey
General Plan/Housing Element – new resources/staffing
• Expanded PlaceWork’s Scope for General Plan Assistance • New agreements for agriculture economic study, outreach, and Housing Element Assistance
• Adding Planning Manager and Senior Planner
• ‘On-call’ list for additional services
Work Products in Progress
• Buildout Projections
• Formal Existing Conditions Report
• Goal/Policy matrix
• Housing Element Components
• Agriculture economic study
• Housing/Public Safety outreach

Housing Element
New requirements
Must plan for 6,674 new
units
December 2023 statutory
deadline
Will run ahead of GPU

2015-2023 Building Progress
 Affordable housing is the most difficult to build
Salinas 2015-2023 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) by Income Level Income Level Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total Allocated 537 351 407 934 2,229
Built 225 98 10 928 1,261
Percent Built 42% 27% 2.5% 99% 56%
2023-2031 Unit Allocation
Salinas 2023-2031- Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) by Income Level Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total
920 600 1,692 3,462 6,674
• RHNA number is triple what it was in 2015 because of the continued need for housing.
• Not unique to Salinas. Similar increase throughout Monterey County and California.

Housing Element – Required Sections
Community
Engagement |
Housing Needs
Assessment
Assessment of
Fair Housing
Constraints and
Resource
Analysis
Review of
Previous
Housing Element
Housing Plan
(Goals and
Programs)
Inventory of
Possible
Housing Sites
Housing Element - Timeline
February –
April
May 1 May 1 –
June 14
June 14 –
September
12 September
– October
October November December
Continued
engagement
and plan
drafting
Release
public first
draft
30-day Public
Review
Period + Two
Weeks to
address
Comments
Send draft to
HCD - 90
days to
review
Revise draft
Housing
Element
General Plan
Steering
Committee
Review
Planning
Commission
and Housing
and Land Use
Committee
Review
City Council
Adoption –
December 5
2023 Timeline and priorities
Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
• Housing Element
• Re-engage
Steering
Committee
• Finish documents
underway
• Public Safety and
Housing Element
engagement
• Prepare Draft
Housing Element
• Draft policy
engagement
• Review/Revise
Housing Element
• Draft General
Plan/CAP
• Revise/Adopt
Housing Element
Questions/Comments
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-167, Version: 1
2022 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
Approve a Resolution approving the City of Salinas 2022 Housing Element (HE) Annual Progress Report (APR) and authorizing its submittal to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) as required by Government Code Section 65400(b).

City of Salinas Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FROM: MEGAN HUNTER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
THROUGH: ROD POWELL, PLANNING MANAGER
BY: CRISTINA GONZALEZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANALYST
TITLE: 2022 HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

RECOMMENDATION MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution approving the City of Salinas 2022 Housing Element (HE) Annual Progress Report (APR) and authorizing its submittal to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) as required by Government Code Section 65400(b).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Section 65400 of the California Government Code requires local jurisdictions to submit a Housing Element (HE) Annual Progress Report (APR) addressing the status of the City of Salinas 2015-2023 Housing Element and progress made toward implementing its goals and policies. The report covers calendar year 2022 and h ighlights accomplishments related to housing production and program implementation. The report must be submitted to the HCD and OPR no later than the 1st of April each year.

BACKGROUND
The Housing Element is one (1) of seven (7) mandatory elements of the General Plan and serves as the primary policy document that identifies the goals, policies, and programs related to housing development in the City of Salinas. The City’s current HE covers an eight-year period (2015-2023) and focuses on addressing the housing needs of residents, identify ing adequate land supply for housing, reducing housing production constrain ts, and improv ing housing opportunities for special needs groups. To meet statutory compliance with these reporting requirements, this report is organized as follows:

1. Table A – Submitted Housing Development Applications

2. Table A2 - Building Activity Summary for New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units

Page | 2

3. Table B - Regional Housing Needs– Permitted Units Issued by Affordability

4. Table C - Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need

5. Table D - Program Implementation Status

6. Table E - Commercial Development Bonus Approved

7. Table F - Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites

8. Table G - Locally Owned Lands included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed

9. Table H - Locally Owned Surplus Sites

10. Table I - Unit Constructed Pursuant to Government Code 65852.21 and Applications for Lot Splits Pursuant to Government Code 664117 (SB9)

11. Table J - Student Housing Development for lower income students for which was granted a density bonus pursuant to subparagraph (F) of paragraph ( 1) of subdivision (b) of Section 65915

12. Summary

13. Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting

DISCUSSION
The City continues to make progress in implementing 2015-2023 HE goals, policies, and programs.

Below are key highlights of the City’s accomplishments. 2022 Annual Progress Report Highlights:
 Building Permits Issued: 137 housing related building permits; of these building permits, 134 were for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and 3 were for Multi-Family Dwelling Units.

 Certificates of Occupancy: 232 units approved/finalized.

 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA): The City’s RHNA allocation from 2015 through 2023 is 2, 229 housing units; 57% of the targeted goal has been achieved and the City has produced a total of 1,261 units between 2015 and 2022.

Status of Program Implementation (Table D) Highlights:
 Affordable Housing Projects - Federal entitlement funds were used as gap financing for the following affordable housing projects:
o Parkside Manor Phase I, an 80-unit affordable development by the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM), received $2,108,987 (HOME & PLHA) in gap financing along with a fee deferral for the development impact fees on the project .

Construction was completed in December 2022.
o The Catalyst Apartments, a 5-unit affordable rehabilitation project received $500,000 (CDBG) in gap financing. Rehabilitation was completed in January 2022. o Sun Rose Apartments , an 11 -unit affordable development was awarded $1 million (CDBG & HSA) in gap financing . Construction is expected to be completed by Summer of 2023.

Page | 3

 Code Enforcement Program - 1,349 cases were opened; 1,260 cases were closed in 2022.

 Business Support in the Alisal Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (ANRSA) - The Small Business phone and email hotline assisted with over 178 calls and 222 emails. In April of 2022, the City finalized 22 CDBG Grant Agreements and distributed $400,000 of CDBG Entitlement/CDBG-CV funds to assist local businesses.

 Summary of Community Program Funding - 1) ERAP Rental and Utility Assistance; 2) Salinas Downtown Streets Team; 3) Grow Salinas Fund; 4) Fair Housing Referral Services; 5) Hotel and Motel Vouchers for Homeless; 6) Street Outreach Team; 7) Salinas Homekey Projects; 8) Chinatown Navigation Center, Trailers, and Sprung Operations; 9) Rapid Rehousing; and 10) SHARE Center Operations.

 Salinas Homekey Projects - In collaboration with Shangri-La and Step Up on Second Street, the City was awarded funds for the following projects:

o Step Up on Sanborn – 58 units of permanent supporting housing and 1 manager units o Step Up on Fairview – 45 units of permanent supporting housing and 1 manager unit o Step Up in Salinas – 101 units of permanent supporting housing and 2 manager unit

 SHARE Center - Bay Area Community Services received FY 2022-23 HUD ESG funding in the amount of $86,521 for operations and rapid re-housing activities.

 Salinas Outreach & Response Team (SORT) - The SORT team received FY 2022-23 HUD ESG funding in the amount of $7 2,865. The team consists of one full -time Community Development Analyst/Coordinator, four full-time Outreach Assistants, and two part-time Peer Outreach workers who perform essential outreach and engagement services with the homeless pollution and connect them to services and housing opportunities.

 Continuum of Care Services - The City funded Central Coast Center for Independent Living (CCCIL), Housing Resource Center (HRC), Interim Inc, and Community Homeless Solutions to provide services to unsheltered persons in the City.

 Emergency Rental Assistance Program Funds (ERAP) - The ERAP team continues to guide and process applications for residents impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and provide rental and utility assistance. In total the City received $15.6 Million in ERAP funding. As of December 31, 2022, the City has assisted 1,563 households.

 Alternative Housing Solutions - The City was awarded $500,000 for its Local Early Action Planning (LEAP). The grant earmarked $350,000 toward the General Plan and an additional $150,000 for developing pre-approved plans for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The City worked with Design Path Studio to complete four pre -approved ADU Plans which w ere initially released in July of 2022 to Salinas residents. Due to the 2022 Building Codes

Page | 4

becoming effective in January of 2023, the City and its consultant had to update the four sets of ADU pre-approved plans. Updated plans were recently released in February 2023.

 Housing for Local Workforce:
o Zoning Code Amendment 2022-001 allow hotels and motels in certain zoning districts to operate as extended stay uses with occupancy up to ten (10) months in a year if approved through a Conditional Use Permit. Allowing the use of hotels and motels as extended stay units provides additional short-term housing opportunities.

o Zoning Code Amendment 2022 -002 amended the Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to allow a school district or community college district to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable housing consistent with the Teacher Housing Act of 2016.

Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Highlights
 Inclusionary Housing Ordinance update: On November 15, 2022, City Council amended a portion of the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance to modify exemptions related to the downtown area (Central City Overlay District) to eliminate an exemption for any new residential construction projects but to continue to allow an exemption for adaptive reuse projects.

 Inclusionary Housing and Density Bonus Projects in the Pipeline:
o The Sun Rose Apartments - 11-unit development with 2 density bonus units.

Construction is expected to be completed by Summer 2023. o The Parkside Manor Apartments - 80 units development that includes 31 density bonus units. Construction was completed in December 2022; resident will be moving in 2023.
o Property located at Boronda Road and Hemmingway Drive - The project proposal for this development is set to construct 1,053 ownership units and 500 rental units. Project is in entitlement phase.
o Property located at John Street and Abbott Street - The project proposal is for a mixed- use development that will include 233 residential units. Project is in entitlement phase. o Property located at 467 Market Street - The project proposal for this development is set to construct 84 units. Project is in entitlement phase. 2023-2031 Housing Element Update

As required by state, the City is in the process of updating its HE as part of the City’s Visión Salinas 2040 General Plan Update. The City of Salinas’ current 2015-2023 HE was adopted by Council in December 2015 and was certified by the California Departmen t of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in February 2016. In consideration of the approaching expiration of the current HE at the end of 2023, the City is currently working on a comprehensive update for future Council

Page | 5

consideration and adoption no later than December 15, 2023.

This sixth cycle update of the HE will cover an eight-year planning period of December 31, 2023 through December 31, 203 1 and will consists of six (6) sections that address different aspects of housing within Salinas:

 Introduction/Overview
 Community Participation
 Community Profile/Existing Conditions
 Housing Constraints
 Housing Resources
 Housing Plan/Policies

New to the sixth cycle housing element is an analysis of ways to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (AFFH). The goal of AFFH is to combat housing discrimination, eliminate racial bias, undo historic patterns of segregation, and lift barriers that restrict access in order to foster inclusive communities and achieve racial equity, fair housing choice, and opportunity for all Californians.

In order to meet the December 15, 2023 deadline and ensure technical accuracy, the City has partnered with Veronica Tam and Associates (VTA) to provide consultant support services for the update. VTA previously partnered with the City on the adopted 2015 -2023 HE and brings extensive knowledge and experience in drafting housing elements with jurisdictions throughout the state.

Public participation will be key to formulating a successful HE update. The City has actively engaged the community on the subject of housing since the adoption of the 2015 HE, as a major topic of discussion in recent planning efforts, such as the Alisal Vibrancy Plan, the Chinatown Revitalization Plan, and the Visión Salinas 2040. Formal public engagement related to the HE began with an online HE workshop held on February 9 th, 2023. The City anticipates significant, continued public engagement throughout 2023.

The schedule for the HE update is as follows:

 July 2022 – February 2023: Selection of consultant, data collection and analysis, public engagement
 March – May: continued public engagement and drafting of the HE update  May – June: Release of draft HE update for public review and comment  June – September: Review of draft HE update by HCD
 September – November: revisions to draft HE update as needed  November – December: Release of final HE for public and Planning Commission review  December 5, 2023: Council adoption of 2023-2031 HE and submission to HCD for certification

Page | 6

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Development of the 2022 HE APR was led by the Housing and Community Development Division of the City’s Community Development Department (CDD) in collaboration with other CDD Divisions including Current Planning, Advanced Plannin g and Project Implementation and Code Enforcement. Additional assistance, information, and perspective were also provided by the City’s Public Works, Library and Community Services, Police, and Fire Departments.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

It has been determined the HE APR is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15306, as its strictly for informational purposes, and will not result in a major disturbance to an environmental resource.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The 2022 HE APR supports City of Salinas Strategic Plan 2022-2025 G oals of Economic Development, Housing/Affordable Housing, and Effective and Culturally Responsive Government.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to the City for submitting the HE APR. It should be noted that cities who do not submit an HE APR to HCD and OPR may not be eligible for future grants or loan funding from HCD due to noncompliance with this requirement.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
2022 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
PPT 2022 HE APR

1 RESOLUTION NO. _____ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2022 HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS

REPORT AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND THE GOVERNOR’S

OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH

WHEREAS, Section 65400 of the California Government Code requires the City to file a Housing Element (HE) Annual Progress Report (APR) addressing the status of the General Plan Housing Element and progress made toward implementing its goals and policies; and

WHEREAS, the 2022 HE APR was prepared and must be submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) by April 1, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the City ’s current 2015-2023 General Plan HE was adopted by Council in December 2015 and certified by HCD in February 2016; and

WHEREAS, the HE APR accurately reflects the City’s progress in implementing the goals and policies of the 2015-2023 General Plan Housing Element; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has confirmed that the HE APR is not a project as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 and, therefore, no environmental assessment is required; and

WHEREAS, on March 1, 2023, the City’s Planning Commission adopted a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the 2022 HE APR and authorize its submittal to the State HCD and OPR; and

WHEREAS, on March 14, 2023, City staff provided an administrative report to the City’s Housing and Land Use Committee regarding the 2022 H E APR resulting in a supportive recommendation that City Council approve the 2022 HE APR and authorize its submittal to the State HCD and OPR; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves the 2022 HE APR and finds that the report accurately reflects the City’s progress in implementing the 2015-2023 General Plan Housing Element and authorizes its submittal to HCD and OPR as required by California Government Code Section 65400(b).

PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

2 ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

___________________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor

ATTEST:

_____________________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

Jurisdiction SALINAS ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Application
Status Notes
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 11 12
Prior APN + Current APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID +
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted
+
(see
instructions)
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income
Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Total PROPOSED
Units by Project
Total

APPROVED
Units by project
Total

DISAPPROVED
Units by Project
Was APPLICATION

SUBMITTED
Pursuant to GC
65913.4(b)?
(SB 35
Streamlining)
Ddi the housing
development
application seek
incentives or
concessions
pursuant to
Government Code
section 65915?
Were incentives
or concessions
reqested
pursuant to
Government
Code section
65915 approved?
Please indicate
the status of the
application.

Notes +
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 4 0 2 0 0 348 354 51 0 002251016000 002251016000 119 Cayuga St 119 Cayuga St CUP2022-062 SFD R 12/21/2022 1 1 No No N/A Pending 004423014000 004423014000 1125 D St 1125 D St CUP2022-044 2 to 4 R 8/3/2022 2 2 No No N/A Pending SFD and ADU unit 004283007000 004283007000 1332 Alma Ave 1332 Alma Ave ADU2022-001 ADU O 3/16/2022 1 1 1 No No N/A Approved 153621010000 153621010000
1486 Constitution Blvd 1486 Constitution Blvd CUP2022 -018 5+ R
1/31/2022
4 2 42 48 50 No No N/A Approved Developer is going to pay rental impacts fees. 12% of the units will need to be made
available to Section 8 Program as long as
the program exists.
004443059000 004443059000 622 Dallas Ave 622 Dallas Ave CUP2022-058 2 to 4 R 10/28/2022 2 2 No No N/A Pending SFD and ADU unit 261661011000 261661011000
98 Kip Dr 98 Kip Dr CUP2022-059
5+ R
11/2/2022
39 39 No No N/A Pending
This proposed project is for Senior Housing.

The development is going to be 100%
affordable and will pursue a density bonus.
004601032000 004601032000 441 N Sanborn Rd 441 N Sanborn Rd SPR2022-009 5+ R 8/29/2022 6 6 No No N/A Pending 003201011000 003201011000
45 Casentini St 45 Casentini St SPR2022-011
5+ R
9/29/2022
10 10 No No N/A Pending This project will be subject to the inclusionary ordinance and will probably provide one
affordable unit.
003891016000 003891016000 1110 Alisal St 1110 Alisal St SPR2022-014 2 to 4 R 12/19/2022 3 3 No No N/A Pending 002481034000 002481034000
Multiple Addresses Abbott St & Johnt St TM2022-001
5+ R
9/13/2022
242 242 No No N/A Pending Developer is going to pay rental impacts fees. 12% of the units will need to be made
available to Section 8 Program as long as
the program exists.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Table A
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
51 Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes Density Bonus Law Applications
10 Housing Development Applications Submitted
Table A2
2 3 5 6
Prior APN + Current APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID +
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Entitlement
Date Approved
# of Units issued
Entitlements
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
261212014000 1443 MODOC AVE A 1443 MODOC AVE A B21-056 6 ADU R 0 003663021000 1238 GRANADA
AVE A
1238 GRANADA AVE
A B20-0147 ADU R 0
002461011000 722 AVELAR ST A 722 AVELAR ST A B21-0532 ADU O 0 002423046000 307 GEIL ST 307 GEIL ST B21-0494 ADU O 0
004103011000 924 EAST ST A 924 EAST ST A B21-0336 ADU R 0 261816026000 537 STOCKTON ST
A
537 STOCKTON ST
A B21-0616 ADU O 0
261263005000 123 CHRISTENSEN
AVE
123 CHRISTENSEN
AVE B21-0562 ADU R
0 002456020000 119 PINE ST 119 PINE ST B20-0424 ADU R 0 261271004000 1343 ADAMS ST A 1343 ADAMS ST A B21-0350 ADU O 0 003262009000 230 NOICE DR A 230 NOICE DR A B21-0492 ADU O 0 261562011000 1624 ATHERTON
WAY
1624 ATHERTON
WAY B21-0680 ADU R 0
004072002000 47 N FILICE ST B 47 N FILICE ST B B21-0464 ADU R 0 004072002000 47 N FILICE ST A 47 N FILICE ST A B21-0529 ADU R 0 153571012000 1162 BOBCAT WAY
A
1162 BOBCAT WAY
A B21-0739 ADU O 0
003765003000 20 S FILICE ST A 20 S FILICE ST A B21-0671 ADU R 0 004492022000 302 CROSS AVE A 302 CROSS AVE A B21-0574 ADU R 0 003651017000 445 CABRILLO AVE
A
445 CABRILLO AVE
A B21-0487 ADU O 0
003761022000 85 MAGNOLIA DR A 85 MAGNOLIA DR A B21-054 0 ADU R 0 004461006000 720 BURKE ST A 720 BURKE ST A B21-0618 ADU R 0 004252008000 1224 FAIRHAVEN
ST
1224 FAIRHAVEN
ST B21-0355 ADU O 0
002224019000 002224026000 217 PAJARO ST A 217 PAJARO ST A B21-0613 2 to 4 R 0 002083011000 629 MELROSE DR A 629 MELROSE DR A B21-061 2 ADU O 0 253182012000 18441

NORTHRIDGE DR
18441
NORTHRIDGE DR JADU21-0003 ADU O 0
004482024000 15 BARDIN CIR A 15 BARDIN CIR A B20-0467 ADU R 0 153551012000 833 CASTLETON ST
A
833 CASTLETON ST
A B21-0334 ADU O 0
004491014000 10 BARDIN RD 10 BARDIN RD B21-0567 ADU O 0 002531010000 36 PINE ST A 36 PINE ST A B21-0159 ADU O 0 016351029000 1148 LOYOLA DR 1148 LOYOLA DR B21-0643 ADU R 0 261212011000 1436 TAMPICO AVE
A
1436 TAMPICO AVE
A B21-0573 ADU O 0
261634022000 1532 SEPULVEDA
DR A
1532 SEPULVEDA
DR A B22-0008 ADU O 0
261307008000 1650 CAMBRIAN DR
A
1650 CAMBRIAN DR
A B21-0713 ADU R 0
004642006000 1254 SUMMIT DR A 1254 SUMMIT DR A B22-008 7 ADU R 0 261571035000 1501 BARCELONA
CIR A
1501 BARCELONA
CIR A B22-0028 ADU O 0
004471007000 1422 DEL MONTE
AVE
1422 DEL MONTE
AVE B21-0707 ADU O 0
253283010000 12908 ARTHUR ST
A
12908 ARTHUR ST
A B21-0737 ADU O 0
261482017000 1306 CHEROKEE
DR A
1306 CHEROKEE
DR A B22-0102 ADU O 0
004424016000 1125 C ST A 1125 C ST A B21-0688 ADU O 0
004492002000 316 CROSS AVE A 316 CROSS AVE A B22-0098 A DU R 0 003871009000 649 JOHN ST A 649 JOHN ST A B21-0605 ADU O 0 1 4
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Table A2
2 3 5 6
Prior APN + Current APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID +
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Entitlement
Date Approved
# of Units issued
Entitlements
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 4
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement 261612025000 1511 DURAN ST A 1511 DURAN ST A B21-0628 A DU O 0 004142001000 1 LINDEN ST A 1 LINDEN ST A B21-0706 ADU O 0 002312028000 304 LORIMER ST A 304 LORIMER ST A B21-050 7 ADU R 0 002221015000 235 SOLEDAD ST
1A
235 SOLEDAD ST
1A B21-0368 ADU R 0
004412023000 535 SUNRISE ST A 535 SUNRISE ST A B22-002 7 ADU O 0 261491042000 554 YREKA DR A 554 YREKA DR A B22-0088 ADU R 0 004731010000 14 MIMBRERA CIR
A 14 MIMBRERA CIR A B21-0701 ADU O 0
261444009000 1571 MENLO WAY B 1571 MENLO WAY B B22-011 8 ADU O 0 004591035000 52 MAYFAIR DR A 52 MAYFAIR DR A B21-0243 A DU O 0 004261014000 107 MIDWAY AVE A 107 MIDWAY AVE A B21-041 9 ADU R 0 261503002000 551 YREKA DR A 551 YREKA DR A B22-0057 ADU O 0 004554007000 65 PALOMA AVE A 65 PALOMA AVE A B22-0074 A DU O 0 002501016000 305 ALAMEDA AVE
A
305 ALAMEDA AVE
A B21-0617 ADU O 0
004233013000 1031 MONTANA ST
A
1031 MONTANA ST
A B21-0029 ADU R 0
002532007000 126 PINE ST A 126 PINE ST A B22-0069 ADU O 0 003525008000 1071 POLK ST A 1071 POLK ST A B21-0704 ADU O 0 003525008000 1071 POLK ST B 1071 POLK ST B B21-0705 ADU O 0 004181015000 1229 SECOND AVE
A
1229 SECOND AVE
A B21-0426 ADU O 0
004592010000 128 MAYFAIR DR A 128 MAYFAIR DR A B22-006 8 ADU O 0 002422005000 229 LANG ST A 229 LANG ST A B21-0381 ADU R 0 003811023000 86 E BERNAL DR A 86 E BERNAL DR A B21-060 1 ADU O 0 253131015000 119 SAN JUAN

GRADE RD A
119 SAN JUAN
GRADE RD A B22-0091 ADU O 0
211282004000 126 SUTTON WAY
A 126 SUTTON WAY A B22-0058 ADU R 0
002141009000 42 WEST ST A 42 WEST ST A B21-0614 ADU O 0 261788002000 6 VAN NESS CIR A 6 VAN NESS CIR A B22-004 6 ADU O 0 004443021000 640 DALLAS AVE A 640 DALLAS AVE A B22-006 0 ADU O 0 003676005000 1321 TRAZADO AVE
A
1321 TRAZADO AVE
A B22-0211 ADU O 0
004731013000 26 MIMBRERA CIR
B 26 MIMBRERA CIR B B21-0726 ADU O 0
002532015000 139 OAK ST A 139 OAK ST A B21-0531 ADU R 0 003652002000 414 CABRILLO AVE
A
414 CABRILLO AVE
A B22-0138 ADU O 0
003452014000 203 ANGELUS DR 203 ANGELUS DR B21-0536 ADU R 0 004381007000 1045 SIEBER ST 1045 SIEBER ST B21-0570 ADU O 0 004203004000 1418 FIRST AVE A 1418 FIRST AVE A B22-012 3 ADU O 0 002394015000 49 HARVEST ST A 49 HARVEST ST A B22-0035 A DU R 0 003663004000 1249 RAMONA AVE
A
1249 RAMONA AVE
A B21-0709 ADU O 0
003743024000 1118 GRANADA
AVE A
1118 GRANADA AVE
A B22-0170 ADU O 0
003762002000 42 MAGNOLIA DR A 42 MAGNOLIA DR A B22-021 6 ADU R 0 Table A2
2 3 5 6
Prior APN + Current APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID +
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Entitlement
Date Approved
# of Units issued
Entitlements
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 4
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement 253063013000 104 E LAMAR ST A 104 E LAMAR ST A B22-017 5 ADU O 0 004163015000 1136 E MARKET ST
A
1136 E MARKET ST
A B22-0179 ADU O 0
002122018000 524 ARCHER ST A 524 ARCHER ST A B22-0090 A DU R 0 004521007000 266 PALOMA AVE A 266 PALOMA AVE A B21-049 9 ADU O 0 004145008000 1121 CIRCLE DR 1121 CIRCLE DR B22-0156 ADU O 0 261551017000 1790 TAHOE DR B 1790 TAHOE DR B B21-0715 ADU O 0 261733009000 1006 FLINT CIR A 1006 FLINT CIR A B22-006 4 ADU O 0 153502010000 1102 EAGLE DR A 1102 EAGLE DR A B22-0252 A DU O 0 261433008000 460 MENDOCINO
DR A
460 MENDOCINO
DR A B22-0259 ADU O 0
261721036000 1111 SHERMAN DR
A
1111 SHERMAN DR
A B22-0297 ADU R 0
004022001000 546 TERRACE ST
102
546 TERRACE ST
102 B22-0283 ADU O 0
004383044000 1028 SIEBER ST 1028 SIEBER ST B20-0047 ADU R 0 004123009000 11 CEDAR ST A 11 CEDAR ST A B21-0564 ADU O 0 004123009000 11 CEDAR ST B 11 CEDAR ST B B21-0565 ADU O 0 153362017000 935 LA MANCHA
WAY B
935 LA MANCHA
WAY B B22-0095 ADU O 0
004101050000 33 N SANBORN RD 33 N SANBORN RD B22-0178 A DU R 0 003251013000 249 DORORO DR A 249 DORORO DR A B22-0174 A DU O 0 002353015000 446 SOLEDAD ST C 446 SOLEDAD ST C B22-006 5 ADU R 0 016145017000 1244 VIA PARAISO
A 1244 VIA PARAISO A B22-0232 ADU R 0
004401029000 761 GALINDO ST 761 GALINDO ST B22-0405 ADU O 0 261461004000 511 CHEROKEE CT
A
511 CHEROKEE CT
A B21-0740 ADU O 0
004501009000 254 TORO AVE A 254 TORO AVE A B22-0023 ADU O 0 253131013000 229 SAN JUAN

GRADE RD A
229 SAN JUAN
GRADE RD A B22-0247 ADU R 0
004301024000 1014 GARNER AVE
A
1014 GARNER AVE
A B22-0292 ADU R 0
004285010000 10 ST JOSEPH CIR
A
10 ST JOSEPH CIR
A B21-0653 ADU R 0
153052007000 604 ANDINA CIR A 604 ANDINA CIR A B21-0734 ADU O 0 153053001000 341 BARDIN RD A 341 BARDIN RD A B22-0293 A DU O 0 004433017000 643 TOWT ST A 643 TOWT ST A B22-0350 ADU O 0 253212003000 13293 JACKSON ST
A
13293 JACKSON ST
A B22-0284 ADU R 0
153442031000 841 CHAMISE DR A 841 CHAMISE DR A B21-051 0 ADU O 0 004023023000 534 FREMONT ST A 534 FREMONT ST A B22-021 7 ADU O 0 004443056000 637 NEW DEAL ST
A 637 NEW DEAL ST A B22-0207 ADU O 0
004122004000 17 POPLAR ST 17 POPLAR ST B22-0257 ADU R 0 003731013000 474 E LAUREL DR A 474 E LAUREL DR A B21-0 736 ADU O 0 153362017000 935 LA MANCHA
WAY A
935 LA MANCHA
WAY A B22-0094 ADU O 0
261655011000 1767 CASCADE CT
A
1767 CASCADE CT
A B22-0383 ADU O 0
004152012000 118 VALENCIA ST A 118 VALENCIA ST A B22-0 002 ADU R 0 Table A2
2 3 5 6
Prior APN + Current APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID +
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Entitlement
Date Approved
# of Units issued
Entitlements
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 4
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement 153582014000 1117 FOX GLEN
WAY A
1117 FOX GLEN
WAY A B22-0324 ADU O 0
002631017000 227 KATHERINE
AVE A
227 KATHERINE
AVE A B21-0167 ADU O 0
004661031000 522 SUNRISE ST A 522 SUNRISE ST A B22-022 2 ADU O 0 004105014000 805 EAST ST 805 EAST ST B22-0300 ADU O 0
261251004000 1421 PARSONS
AVE A
1421 PARSONS AVE
A B22-0349 ADU O 0
004143008000 143 LINDEN ST A 143 LINDEN ST A B22-0467 A DU R 0 153713062000 1289 PALERMO DR
A
1289 PALERMO DR
A B22-0267 ADU O 0
261582029000 1717 ALTURAS CIR
A
1717 ALTURAS CIR
A B22-0313 ADU R 0
003722012000 119 ROSARITA DR
A 119 ROSARITA DR A B22-0488 ADU O 0
261481028000 1325 CHEROKEE
DR A
1325 CHEROKEE
DR A B21-0620 ADU O 0
002311019000 256 CLAY ST A 256 CLAY ST A B22-0291 ADU R 0 004436004000 1101 CORTEZ ST
AA
1101 CORTEZ ST
AA B22-0411 ADU R 0
004273018000 1405

GRANDHAVEN ST A
1405 GRANDHAVEN
ST A B22-0473 ADU O
0 004383056000 1143 N SANBORN
RD A
1143 N SANBORN
RD A B22-0052 5+ R 0
004383056000 1143 N SANBORN
RD B
1143 N SANBORN
RD B B22-0053 2 to 4 R 0
153222009000 1066 TWIN CREEKS
DR
1066 TWIN CREEKS
DR B22-0096 ADU R 0
002252017000 141 CENTRAL AVE
A
141 CENTRAL AVE
A B22-0071 ADU R 0
002285003000 820 W ALISAL ST A 820 W ALISAL ST A B22-0 495 ADU O 0 002311010000 350 WEST ST B 350 WEST ST B B22-0430 ADU R 0 003352012000 24 N FOURTH ST 24 N FOURTH ST B22-0181 ADU R 0 261506012000 514 CALAVERAS
DR A
514 CALAVERAS DR
A B22-0314 ADU R 0
004161011000 21 KENTUCKY ST A 21 KENTUCKY ST A B21-049 5 ADU O 0 004461004000 728 BURKE ST A 728 BURKE ST A B22-0346 ADU R 0 004641014000 1244 HILL TOP DR
A 1244 HILL TOP DR A B19-0966 ADU O 0
003523030000 1090 HARDING ST
A 1090 HARDING ST A B19-0968 ADU R 0
004492007000 346 CROSS AVE 346 CROSS AVE B20-0391 ADU O 0 004731013000 26 MIMBRERA CIR
A 26 MIMBRERA CIR A B20-0425 ADU O 0
003765021000 17 TULIP CIR 17 TULIP CIR B20-0306 ADU O 0 004492008000 350 CROSS AVE A 350 CROSS AVE A B20-0163 A DU O 0 261472009000 580 MARIPOSA ST
A 580 MARIPOSA ST A B21-0005 ADU O 0
261271011000 1423 ADAMS ST 1423 ADAMS ST B21-0042 ADU R 0 153342012000 846 LA CUESTA CT 846 LA CUESTA CT B20-038 0 ADU O 0 003673024000 1342 RAMONA AVE 1342 RAMONA AVE B19-0818 A DU O 0 253285012000 18690

EISENHOWER ST
18690
EISENHOWER ST B21-0127 ADU R 0
261225002000 609 GLACIER DR A 609 GLACIER DR A B21-037 1 ADU O 0 Table A2
2 3 5 6
Prior APN + Current APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID +
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Entitlement
Date Approved
# of Units issued
Entitlements
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 4
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement 261275002000 354 OSAGE DR A 354 OSAGE DR A B21-0251 ADU O 0 211253009000 319 WESTMINSTER
DR A
319 WESTMINSTER
DR A B20-0364 ADU R
0 261571036000 1503 BARCELONA
CIR A
1503 BARCELONA
CIR A B21-0358 ADU R 0
261721021000 810 HOWE DR A 810 HOWE DR A B21-0357 ADU R 0 004192015000 1266 FIRST AVE A 1266 FIRST AVE A B21-032 9 ADU O 0 261774011000 769 ALVARADO DR
A
769 ALVARADO DR
A B21-0359 ADU O 0
004434012000 546 MAE AVE A 546 MAE AVE A B21-0333 ADU R 0 261654002000 581 YOSEMITE WAY
A
581 YOSEMITE WAY
A B21-0212 ADU O 0
261563020000 1611 ATHERTON
WY
1611 ATHERTON
WY B20-0441 ADU O 0
004192058000 12 TOWT ST A 12 TOWT ST A B20-0135 ADU O 0 002452004000 116 MAPLE ST A 116 MAPLE ST A B19-0591 ADU O 0 004124002000 14 CEDAR ST A 14 CEDAR ST A B20-0223 ADU O 0 003304023000 1218 POLK ST A 1218 POLK ST A B19-0564 ADU O 0 003392018000 1340 N MAIN DR A 1340 N MAIN DR A B20-038 7 ADU O 0 004642001000 1274 SUMMIT DR A 1274 SUMMIT DR A B20-042 0 ADU O 0 002142001000 339 PARK ST 339 PARK ST B20-0444 ADU R 0
002471052000 35 SANTA LUCIA
AVE
35 SANTA LUCIA
AVE B20-0299 ADU O 0
004294004000 1216 ALMA AVE A 1216 ALMA AVE A B20-0240 A DU O 0 003454024000 232 DIABLO DR 232 DIABLO DR B20-0407 ADU O 0 002231006000 226 PAJARO ST 226 PAJARO ST B21-0116 ADU O 0 002536020000 111 HAWTHORNE
ST
111 HAWTHORNE
ST B21-0121 ADU R 0
002631053000 101 SAN JUAN DR A 101 SAN JUAN DR A B21-0 054 ADU R 0 004242003000 1110 MONTANA ST 1110 MONTANA ST B21-0125 A DU O 0 002902024000 854 FAIRMONT CIR 854 FAIRMONT CIR B20-048 2 ADU O 0 003372015000 222 DOUGLAS AVE
A
222 DOUGLAS AVE
A B19-0496 ADU O 0
002223007000 324 SOLEDAD ST 324 SOLEDAD ST B21-0140 ADU O 0 004433023000 611 TOWT ST A 611 TOWT ST A B19-0584 ADU R 0 003652007000 440 CABRILLO AVE
A
440 CABRILLO AVE
A B20-0272 ADU R 0
002141001000 343 ALEXANDER ST
A
343 ALEXANDER ST
A B20-0469 ADU O 0
002141001000 347 ALEXANDER ST
A
347 ALEXANDER ST
A B20-0471 ADU O 0
261372019000 1533 INYO CIR 1533 INYO CIR B21-0328 ADU O 0 004502025000 229 MARGARET ST
A
229 MARGARET ST
A B20-0382 ADU O 0
253111019000 2073 SANTA RITA
ST 130
2073 SANTA RITA
ST 130 B21-0324 ADU R 0
253111020000 2073 SANTA RITA
ST 86A
2073 SANTA RITA
ST 86A B21-0325 ADU R 0
003252019000 255 MARYAL DR A 255 MARYAL DR A B20-0549 A DU R 0 004111018000 43 EUCALYPTUS
DR A
43 EUCALYPTUS
DR A B21-0077 ADU O 0
004451030000 701 TOWT ST 701 TOWT ST B21-0178 ADU R 0
004163002000 63 MYRTLE CT 63 MYRTLE CT B21-0144 ADU O 0 Table A2
2 3 5 6
Prior APN + Current APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID +
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Entitlement
Date Approved
# of Units issued
Entitlements
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 4
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement 004342040000 704 GARNER AVE
10A
704 GARNER AVE
10A B21-0112 ADU O 0
003743030000 1142 GRANADA
AVE A
1142 GRANADA AVE
A B21-0498 ADU R 0
002082012000 16 CEDROS AVE 16 CEDROS AVE B21-0434 ADU O 0 003304015000 1257 TYLER ST A 1257 TYLER ST A B20-0476 A DU R 0 002455018000 37 PINE ST 37 PINE ST B21-0738 ADU R 0
003831035000 46 LUNSFORD DR 46 LUNSFORD DR B10-0669 5+ R 0 003773057000 1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A
1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A B19-0956 5+ R 0
003773057000 1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A
1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A B19-0955 5+ R 0
002455018000 37 PINE ST 37 PINE ST B21-0224 SFD R 0
002233019001 301 MAIN ST 301 MAIN ST B19-0361 5+ R 0
002341001000 300 MAIN ST 300 MAIN ST B21-0257 5+ R 0
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 8 9
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
0 0 0 0 0 0 139 139
261212014000 1443 MODOC AVE A 1443 MODOC AVE A 1 1/6/2022 1 003663021000 1238 GRANADA AVE
A
1238 GRANADA AVE
A 1 1/10/2022 1
002461011000 722 AVELAR ST A 722 AVELAR ST A 1 1/11/2022 1 002423046000 307 GEIL ST 307 GEIL ST 1 1/12/2022 1
004103011000 924 EAST ST A 924 EAST ST A 1 1/13/2022 1
261816026000 537 STOCKTON ST
A
537 STOCKTON ST
A 1 1/19/2022 1
261263005000 123 CHRISTENSEN
AVE
123 CHRISTENSEN
AVE 1 1/26/2022 1
002456020000 119 PINE ST 119 PINE ST 1 1/28/2022 1
261271004000 1343 ADAMS ST A 1343 ADAMS ST A 1 2/2/2022 1 003262009000 230 NOICE DR A 230 NOICE DR A 1 2/25/2022 1 261562011000 1624 ATHERTON
WAY
1624 ATHERTON
WAY 1 2/25/2022 1
004072002000 47 N FILICE ST B 47 N FILICE ST B 1 3/1/2022 1 004072002000 47 N FILICE ST A 47 N FILICE ST A 1 3/1/2022 1 153571012000 1162 BOBCAT WAY
A
1162 BOBCAT WAY
A 1 3/1/2022 1
003765003000 20 S FILICE ST A 20 S FILICE ST A 1 3/4/2022 1 004492022000 302 CROSS AVE A 302 CROSS AVE A 1 3/11/2022 1 003651017000 445 CABRILLO AVE
A
445 CABRILLO AVE
A 1 3/16/2022 1
003761022000 85 MAGNOLIA DR A 85 MAGNOLIA DR A 1 3/24/2022 1 004461006000 720 BURKE ST A 720 BURKE ST A 1 3/29/2022 1 004252008000 1224 FAIRHAVEN ST 1224 FAIRHAVEN ST 1 4/5/2022 1 002224026000 217 PAJARO ST A 217 PAJARO ST A 3 4/5/2022 3 002083011000 629 MELROSE DR A 629 MELROSE DR A 1 4/6/2022 1 253182012000 18441 NORTHRIDGE
DR
18441 NORTHRIDGE
DR 1 4/6/2022 1
004482024000 15 BARDIN CIR A 15 BARDIN CIR A 1 4/8/2022 1 153551012000 833 CASTLETON ST
A
833 CASTLETON ST
A 1 4/8/2022 1
004491014000 10 BARDIN RD 10 BARDIN RD 1 4/8/2022 1
002531010000 36 PINE ST A 36 PINE ST A 1 4/12/2022 1
016351029000 1148 LOYOLA DR 1148 LOYOLA DR 1 4/13/2022 1 261212011000 1436 TAMPICO AVE
A
1436 TAMPICO AVE
A 1 4/20/2022 1
7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 8 9
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
0 0 0 0 0 0 139 139
7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits 261634022000 1532 SEPULVEDA
DR A
1532 SEPULVEDA
DR A 1 4/20/2022 1
261307008000 1650 CAMBRIAN DR
A
1650 CAMBRIAN DR
A 1 4/25/2022 1
004642006000 1254 SUMMIT DR A 1254 SUMMIT DR A 1 4/26/2022 1 261571035000 1501 BARCELONA
CIR A
1501 BARCELONA
CIR A 1 4/27/2022 1
004471007000 1422 DEL MONTE
AVE
1422 DEL MONTE
AVE 1 4/28/2022 1
253283010000 12908 ARTHUR ST A 12908 ARTHUR ST A 1 4/28/2022 1 261482017000 1306 CHEROKEE DR
A
1306 CHEROKEE DR
A 1 4/28/2022 1
004424016000 1125 C ST A 1125 C ST A 1 5/4/2022 1
004492002000 316 CROSS AVE A 316 CROSS AVE A 1 5/10/2022 1 003871009000 649 JOHN ST A 649 JOHN ST A 1 5/12/2022 1
261612025000 1511 DURAN ST A 1511 DURAN ST A 1 5/17/2022 1 004142001000 1 LINDEN ST A 1 LINDEN ST A 1 5/24/2022 1
002312028000 304 LORIMER ST A 304 LORIMER ST A 1 5/31/2022 1 002221015000 235 SOLEDAD ST 1A 235 SOLEDAD ST 1A 1 6/2/2022 1 004412023000 535 SUNRISE ST A 535 SUNRISE ST A 1 6/2/2022 1 261491042000 554 YREKA DR A 554 YREKA DR A 1 6/2/2022 1 004731010000 14 MIMBRERA CIR A 14 MIMBRERA CIR A 1 6/6/2022 1 261444009000 1571 MENLO WAY B 1571 MENLO WAY B 1 6/6/2022 1 004591035000 52 MAYFAIR DR A 52 MAYFAIR DR A 1 6/7/2022 1 004261014000 107 MIDWAY AVE A 107 MIDWAY AVE A 1 6/7/2022 1 261503002000 551 YREKA DR A 551 YREKA DR A 1 6/7/2022 1 004554007000 65 PALOMA AVE A 65 PALOMA AVE A 1 6/10/2022 1 002501016000 305 ALAMEDA AVE A 305 ALAMEDA AVE A 1 6/14/2022 1 004233013000 1031 MONTANA ST
A
1031 MONTANA ST
A 1 6/15/2022 1
002532007000 126 PINE ST A 126 PINE ST A 1 6/15/2022 1
003525008000 1071 POLK ST A 1071 POLK ST A 1 6/20/2022 1 003525008000 1071 POLK ST B 1071 POLK ST B 1 6/20/2022 1 Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 8 9
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
0 0 0 0 0 0 139 139
7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits 004181015000 1229 SECOND AVE
A
1229 SECOND AVE
A 1 6/22/2022 1
004592010000 128 MAYFAIR DR A 128 MAYFAIR DR A 1 6/22/2022 1 002422005000 229 LANG ST A 229 LANG ST A 1 6/27/2022 1
003811023000 86 E BERNAL DR A 86 E BERNAL DR A 1 6/27/2022 1 253131015000 119 SAN JUAN

GRADE RD A
119 SAN JUAN
GRADE RD A 1 6/27/2022 1
211282004000 126 SUTTON WAY A 126 SUTTON WAY A 1 6/28/2022 1 002141009000 42 WEST ST A 42 WEST ST A 1 6/30/2022 1
261788002000 6 VAN NESS CIR A 6 VAN NESS CIR A 1 6/30/2022 1 004443021000 640 DALLAS AVE A 640 DALLAS AVE A 1 6/30/2022 1 003676005000 1321 TRAZADO AVE
A
1321 TRAZADO AVE
A 1 6/30/2022 1
004731013000 26 MIMBRERA CIR B 26 MIMBRERA CIR B 1 7/5/2022 1 002532015000 139 OAK ST A 139 OAK ST A 1 7/11/2022 1
003652002000 414 CABRILLO AVE
A
414 CABRILLO AVE
A 1 7/11/2022 1
003452014000 203 ANGELUS DR 203 ANGELUS DR 1 7/12/2022 1 004381007000 1045 SIEBER ST 1045 SIEBER ST 1 7/12/2022 1 004203004000 1418 FIRST AVE A 1418 FIRST AVE A 1 7/25/2022 1 002394015000 49 HARVEST ST A 49 HARVEST ST A 1 7/28/2022 1 003663004000 1249 RAMONA AVE
A
1249 RAMONA AVE
A 1 7/29/2022 1
003743024000 1118 GRANADA AVE
A
1118 GRANADA AVE
A 1 8/3/2022 1
003762002000 42 MAGNOLIA DR A 42 MAGNOLIA DR A 1 8/3/2022 1 253063013000 104 E LAMAR ST A 104 E LAMAR ST A 1 8/4/2022 1 004163015000 1136 E MARKET ST
A
1136 E MARKET ST
A 1 8/4/2022 1
002122018000 524 ARCHER ST A 524 ARCHER ST A 1 8/19/2022 1 004521007000 266 PALOMA AVE A 266 PALOMA AVE A 1 8/24/2022 1 004145008000 1121 CIRCLE DR 1121 CIRCLE DR 1 8/24/2022 1 261551017000 1790 TAHOE DR B 1790 TAHOE DR B 1 8/31/2022 1 261733009000 1006 FLINT CIR A 1006 FLINT CIR A 1 8/31/2022 1 Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 8 9
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
0 0 0 0 0 0 139 139
7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits 153502010000 1102 EAGLE DR A 1102 EAGLE DR A 1 8/31/2022 1 261433008000 460 MENDOCINO DR
A
460 MENDOCINO DR
A 1 9/1/2022 1
261721036000 1111 SHERMAN DR
A
1111 SHERMAN DR
A 1 9/2/2022 1
004022001000 546 TERRACE ST
102
546 TERRACE ST
102 1 9/7/2022 1
004383044000 1028 SIEBER ST 1028 SIEBER ST 1 9/8/2022 1 004123009000 11 CEDAR ST A 11 CEDAR ST A 1 9/8/2022 1
004123009000 11 CEDAR ST B 11 CEDAR ST B 1 9/8/2022 1
153362017000 935 LA MANCHA
WAY B
935 LA MANCHA
WAY B 1 9/8/2022 1
004101050000 33 N SANBORN RD 33 N SANBORN RD 1 9/9/2022 1 003251013000 249 DORORO DR A 249 DORORO DR A 1 9/13/2022 1 002353015000 446 SOLEDAD ST C 446 SOLEDAD ST C 1 9/16/2022 1 016145017000 1244 VIA PARAISO A 1244 VIA PARAISO A 1 9/22/2022 1 004401029000 761 GALINDO ST 761 GALINDO ST 1 9/22/2022 1 261461004000 511 CHEROKEE CT
A
511 CHEROKEE CT
A 1 9/23/2022 1
004501009000 254 TORO AVE A 254 TORO AVE A 1 9/26/2022 1 253131013000 229 SAN JUAN

GRADE RD A
229 SAN JUAN
GRADE RD A 1 9/26/2022 1
004301024000 1014 GARNER AVE
A
1014 GARNER AVE
A 1 9/27/2022 1
004285010000 10 ST JOSEPH CIR A 10 ST JOSEPH CIR A 1 9/28/2022 1 153052007000 604 ANDINA CIR A 604 ANDINA CIR A 1 9/28/2022 1 153053001000 341 BARDIN RD A 341 BARDIN RD A 1 9/30/2022 1 004433017000 643 TOWT ST A 643 TOWT ST A 1 9/30/2022 1
253212003000 13293 JACKSON ST
A
13293 JACKSON ST
A 1 10/3/2022 1
153442031000 841 CHAMISE DR A 841 CHAMISE DR A 1 10/10/2022 1 004023023000 534 FREMONT ST A 534 FREMONT ST A 1 10/11/2022 1 004443056000 637 NEW DEAL ST A 637 NEW DEAL ST A 1 10/14/2022 1 004122004000 17 POPLAR ST 17 POPLAR ST 1 10/24/2022 1
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 8 9
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
0 0 0 0 0 0 139 139
7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits 003731013000 474 E LAUREL DR A 474 E LAUREL DR A 1 10/27/2022 1 153362017000 935 LA MANCHA
WAY A
935 LA MANCHA
WAY A 1 10/27/2022 1
261655011000 1767 CASCADE CT A 1767 CASCADE CT A 1 10/28/2022 1 004152012000 118 VALENCIA ST A 118 VALENCIA ST A 1 11/1/2022 1 153582014000 1117 FOX GLEN
WAY A
1117 FOX GLEN
WAY A 1 11/1/2022 1
002631017000 227 KATHERINE AVE
A
227 KATHERINE AVE
A 1 11/3/2022 1
004661031000 522 SUNRISE ST A 522 SUNRISE ST A 1 11/3/2022 1 004105014000 805 EAST ST 805 EAST ST 1 11/4/2022 1
261251004000 1421 PARSONS AVE
A
1421 PARSONS AVE
A 1 11/8/2022 1
004143008000 143 LINDEN ST A 143 LINDEN ST A 1 11/8/2022 1 153713062000 1289 PALERMO DR
A
1289 PALERMO DR
A 1 11/10/2022 1
261582029000 1717 ALTURAS CIR
A
1717 ALTURAS CIR
A 1 11/14/2022 1
003722012000 119 ROSARITA DR A 119 ROSARITA DR A 1 11/15/2022 1 261481028000 1325 CHEROKEE DR
A
1325 CHEROKEE DR
A 1 11/18/2022 1
002311019000 256 CLAY ST A 256 CLAY ST A 1 11/21/2022 1 004436004000 1101 CORTEZ ST AA 1101 CORTEZ ST AA 1 11/21/2022 1 004273018000 1405 GRANDHAVEN
ST A
1405 GRANDHAVEN
ST A 1 11/21/2022 1
004383056000 1143 N SANBORN
RD A
1143 N SANBORN
RD A 1 11/30/2022 1
004383056000 1143 N SANBORN
RD B
1143 N SANBORN
RD B 1 11/30/2022 1
153222009000 1066 TWIN CREEKS
DR
1066 TWIN CREEKS
DR 1 11/30/2022 1
002252017000 141 CENTRAL AVE A 141 CENTRAL AVE A 1 12/2/2022 1 002285003000 820 W ALISAL ST A 820 W ALISAL ST A 1 12/9/2022 1 002311010000 350 WEST ST B 350 WEST ST B 1 12/12/2022 1 003352012000 24 N FOURTH ST 24 N FOURTH ST 1 12/15/2022 1 Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 8 9
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
0 0 0 0 0 0 139 139
7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits 261506012000 514 CALAVERAS DR
A
514 CALAVERAS DR
A 1 12/15/2022 1
004161011000 21 KENTUCKY ST A 21 KENTUCKY ST A 1 12/19/2022 1 004461004000 728 BURKE ST A 728 BURKE ST A 1 12/19/2022 1 004641014000 1244 HILL TOP DR A 1244 HILL TOP DR A 1 12/21/2022 1 003523030000 1090 HARDING ST A 1090 HARDING ST A 0
004492007000 346 CROSS AVE 346 CROSS AVE 0
004731013000 26 MIMBRERA CIR A 26 MIMBRERA CIR A 0
003765021000 17 TULIP CIR 17 TULIP CIR 0
004492008000 350 CROSS AVE A 350 CROSS AVE A 0
261472009000 580 MARIPOSA ST A 580 MARIPOSA ST A 0
261271011000 1423 ADAMS ST 1423 ADAMS ST 0
153342012000 846 LA CUESTA CT 846 LA CUESTA CT 0
003673024000 1342 RAMONA AVE 1342 RAMONA AVE 0
253285012000 18690 EISENHOWER
ST
18690 EISENHOWER
ST 0
261225002000 609 GLACIER DR A 609 GLACIER DR A 0
261275002000 354 OSAGE DR A 354 OSAGE DR A 0
211253009000 319 WESTMINSTER
DR A
319 WESTMINSTER
DR A 0
261571036000 1503 BARCELONA
CIR A
1503 BARCELONA
CIR A 0
261721021000 810 HOWE DR A 810 HOWE DR A 0
004192015000 1266 FIRST AVE A 1266 FIRST AVE A 0
261774011000 769 ALVARADO DR
A
769 ALVARADO DR
A 0
004434012000 546 MAE AVE A 546 MAE AVE A 0
261654002000 581 YOSEMITE WAY
A
581 YOSEMITE WAY
A 0
261563020000 1611 ATHERTON WY 1611 ATHERTON WY 0
004192058000 12 TOWT ST A 12 TOWT ST A 0
002452004000 116 MAPLE ST A 116 MAPLE ST A 0
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 8 9
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
0 0 0 0 0 0 139 139
7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits 004124002000 14 CEDAR ST A 14 CEDAR ST A 0
003304023000 1218 POLK ST A 1218 POLK ST A 0
003392018000 1340 N MAIN DR A 1340 N MAIN DR A 0
004642001000 1274 SUMMIT DR A 1274 SUMMIT DR A 0
002142001000 339 PARK ST 339 PARK ST 0
002471052000 35 SANTA LUCIA
AVE
35 SANTA LUCIA
AVE 0
004294004000 1216 ALMA AVE A 1216 ALMA AVE A 0
003454024000 232 DIABLO DR 232 DIABLO DR 0
002231006000 226 PAJARO ST 226 PAJARO ST 0
002536020000 111 HAWTHORNE
ST
111 HAWTHORNE
ST 0
002631053000 101 SAN JUAN DR A 101 SAN JUAN DR A 0
004242003000 1110 MONTANA ST 1110 MONTANA ST 0
002902024000 854 FAIRMONT CIR 854 FAIRMONT CIR 0
003372015000 222 DOUGLAS AVE
A
222 DOUGLAS AVE
A 0
002223007000 324 SOLEDAD ST 324 SOLEDAD ST 0
004433023000 611 TOWT ST A 611 TOWT ST A 0
003652007000 440 CABRILLO AVE
A
440 CABRILLO AVE
A 0
002141001000 343 ALEXANDER ST
A
343 ALEXANDER ST
A 0
002141001000 347 ALEXANDER ST
A
347 ALEXANDER ST
A 0
261372019000 1533 INYO CIR 1533 INYO CIR 0
004502025000 229 MARGARET ST
A
229 MARGARET ST
A 0
253111019000 2073 SANTA RITA ST
130
2073 SANTA RITA ST
130 0
253111020000 2073 SANTA RITA ST
86A
2073 SANTA RITA ST
86A 0
003252019000 255 MARYAL DR A 255 MARYAL DR A 0
004111018000 43 EUCALYPTUS DR
A
43 EUCALYPTUS DR
A 0
004451030000 701 TOWT ST 701 TOWT ST 0
004163002000 63 MYRTLE CT 63 MYRTLE CT 0
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 8 9
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
0 0 0 0 0 0 139 139
7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits 004342040000 704 GARNER AVE
10A
704 GARNER AVE
10A 0
003743030000 1142 GRANADA AVE
A
1142 GRANADA AVE
A 0
002082012000 16 CEDROS AVE 16 CEDROS AVE 0
003304015000 1257 TYLER ST A 1257 TYLER ST A 0
002455018000 37 PINE ST 37 PINE ST 0
003831035000 46 LUNSFORD DR 46 LUNSFORD DR 0
003773057000 1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A
1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A 0
003773057000 1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A
1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A 0
002455018000 37 PINE ST 37 PINE ST 0
002233019001 301 MAIN ST 301 MAIN ST 0
002341001000 300 MAIN ST 300 MAIN ST 0
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 11 12
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
78 0 1 0 0 0 153 232
261212014000 1443 MODOC AVE
A 1443 MODOC AVE A 1 8/19/2022 1
003663021000 1238 GRANADA
AVE A
1238 GRANADA
AVE A 0
002461011000 722 AVELAR ST A 722 AVELAR ST A 1 10/19/2022 1 002423046000 307 GEIL ST 307 GEIL ST 0
004103011000 924 EAST ST A 924 EAST ST A 0
261816026000 537 STOCKTON ST
A
537 STOCKTON ST
A 1 4/26/2022 1
261263005000 123 CHRISTENSEN
AVE
123 CHRISTENSEN
AVE 1 3/24/2022 1
002456020000 119 PINE ST 119 PINE ST 0
261271004000 1343 ADAMS ST A 1343 ADAMS ST A 0
003262009000 230 NOICE DR A 230 NOICE DR A 1 5/16/2022 1 261562011000 1624 ATHERTON
WAY
1624 ATHERTON
WAY 0
004072002000 47 N FILICE ST B 47 N FILICE ST B 0
004072002000 47 N FILICE ST A 47 N FILICE ST A 0
153571012000 1162 BOBCAT WAY
A
1162 BOBCAT WAY
A 0
003765003000 20 S FILICE ST A 20 S FILICE ST A 0
004492022000 302 CROSS AVE A 302 CROSS AVE A 1 8/17/2022 1 003651017000 445 CABRILLO AVE
A
445 CABRILLO AVE
A 0
003761022000 85 MAGNOLIA DR A 85 MAGNOLIA DR A 0
004461006000 720 BURKE ST A 720 BURKE ST A 0
004252008000 1224 FAIRHAVEN
ST
1224 FAIRHAVEN
ST 0
002224026000 217 PAJARO ST A 217 PAJARO ST A 3 12/16/2022 3 002083011000 629 MELROSE DR
A 629 MELROSE DR A 0
253182012000 18441

NORTHRIDGE DR
18441
NORTHRIDGE DR 1 10/3/2022 1
004482024000 15 BARDIN CIR A 15 BARDIN CIR A 0
153551012000 833 CASTLETON
ST A
833 CASTLETON ST
A 0
004491014000 10 BARDIN RD 10 BARDIN RD 0
002531010000 36 PINE ST A 36 PINE ST A 1 9/15/2022 1
016351029000 1148 LOYOLA DR 1148 LOYOLA DR 0
261212011000 1436 TAMPICO AVE
A
1436 TAMPICO AVE
A 0
Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 Project Identifier
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 11 12
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
78 0 1 0 0 0 153 232
Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 Project Identifier
261634022000 1532 SEPULVEDA
DR A
1532 SEPULVEDA
DR A 0
261307008000 1650 CAMBRIAN DR
A
1650 CAMBRIAN DR
A 1 7/19/2022 1
004642006000 1254 SUMMIT DR A 1254 SUMMIT DR A 1 6/8/2022 1 261571035000 1501 BARCELONA
CIR A
1501 BARCELONA
CIR A 1 9/28/2022 1
004471007000 1422 DEL MONTE
AVE
1422 DEL MONTE
AVE 1 8/5/2022 1
253283010000 12908 ARTHUR ST
A
12908 ARTHUR ST
A 0
261482017000 1306 CHEROKEE
DR A
1306 CHEROKEE
DR A 0
004424016000 1125 C ST A 1125 C ST A 0
004492002000 316 CROSS AVE A 316 CROSS AVE A 0
003871009000 649 JOHN ST A 649 JOHN ST A 0
261612025000 1511 DURAN ST A 1511 DURAN ST A 0
004142001000 1 LINDEN ST A 1 LINDEN ST A 0
002312028000 304 LORIMER ST A 304 LORIMER ST A 1 12/21/2022 1 002221015000 235 SOLEDAD ST
1A
235 SOLEDAD ST
1A 0
004412023000 535 SUNRISE ST A 535 SUNRISE ST A 0
261491042000 554 YREKA DR A 554 YREKA DR A 1 6/23/2022 1 004731010000 14 MIMBRERA CIR
A
14 MIMBRERA CIR
A 0
261444009000 1571 MENLO WAY
B 1571 MENLO WAY B 1 7/12/2022 1
004591035000 52 MAYFAIR DR A 52 MAYFAIR DR A 0
004261014000 107 MIDWAY AVE A 107 MIDWAY AVE A 0
261503002000 551 YREKA DR A 551 YREKA DR A 0
004554007000 65 PALOMA AVE A 65 PALOMA AVE A 0
002501016000 305 ALAMEDA AVE
A
305 ALAMEDA AVE
A 0
004233013000 1031 MONTANA ST
A
1031 MONTANA ST
A 0
002532007000 126 PINE ST A 126 PINE ST A 0
003525008000 1071 POLK ST A 1071 POLK ST A 0
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 11 12
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
78 0 1 0 0 0 153 232
Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 Project Identifier
003525008000 1071 POLK ST B 1071 POLK ST B 0
004181015000 1229 SECOND AVE
A
1229 SECOND AVE
A 0
004592010000 128 MAYFAIR DR A 128 MAYFAIR DR A 0
002422005000 229 LANG ST A 229 LANG ST A 0
003811023000 86 E BERNAL DR A 86 E BERNAL DR A 0
253131015000 119 SAN JUAN

GRADE RD A
119 SAN JUAN
GRADE RD A 0
211282004000 126 SUTTON WAY
A
126 SUTTON WAY
A 1 8/31/2022 1
002141009000 42 WEST ST A 42 WEST ST A 0
261788002000 6 VAN NESS CIR A 6 VAN NESS CIR A 0
004443021000 640 DALLAS AVE A 640 DALLAS AVE A 0
003676005000 1321 TRAZADO
AVE A
1321 TRAZADO AVE
A 1 12/16/2022 1
004731013000 26 MIMBRERA CIR
B
26 MIMBRERA CIR
B 0
002532015000 139 OAK ST A 139 OAK ST A 0
003652002000 414 CABRILLO AVE
A
414 CABRILLO AVE
A 0
003452014000 203 ANGELUS DR 203 ANGELUS DR 0
004381007000 1045 SIEBER ST 1045 SIEBER ST 0
004203004000 1418 FIRST AVE A 1418 FIRST AVE A 0
002394015000 49 HARVEST ST A 49 HARVEST ST A 0
003663004000 1249 RAMONA AVE
A
1249 RAMONA AVE
A 1 10/12/2022 1
003743024000 1118 GRANADA
AVE A
1118 GRANADA
AVE A 1 12/2/2022 1
003762002000 42 MAGNOLIA DR A 42 MAGNOLIA DR A 0
253063013000 104 E LAMAR ST A 104 E LAMAR ST A 0
004163015000 1136 E MARKET ST
A
1136 E MARKET ST
A 0
002122018000 524 ARCHER ST A 524 ARCHER ST A 0
004521007000 266 PALOMA AVE A 266 PALOMA AVE A 0
004145008000 1121 CIRCLE DR 1121 CIRCLE DR 0
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 11 12
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
78 0 1 0 0 0 153 232
Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 Project Identifier
261551017000 1790 TAHOE DR B 1790 TAHOE DR B 0
261733009000 1006 FLINT CIR A 1006 FLINT CIR A 0
153502010000 1102 EAGLE DR A 1102 EAGLE DR A 0
261433008000 460 MENDOCINO
DR A
460 MENDOCINO
DR A 0
261721036000 1111 SHERMAN DR
A
1111 SHERMAN DR
A 0
004022001000 546 TERRACE ST
102
546 TERRACE ST
102 0
004383044000 1028 SIEBER ST 1028 SIEBER ST 0
004123009000 11 CEDAR ST A 11 CEDAR ST A 0
004123009000 11 CEDAR ST B 11 CEDAR ST B 0
153362017000 935 LA MANCHA
WAY B
935 LA MANCHA
WAY B 0
004101050000 33 N SANBORN RD 33 N SANBORN RD 0
003251013000 249 DORORO DR A 249 DORORO DR A 0
002353015000 446 SOLEDAD ST C 446 SOLEDAD ST C 0
016145017000 1244 VIA PARAISO
A
1244 VIA PARAISO
A 0
004401029000 761 GALINDO ST 761 GALINDO ST 0
261461004000 511 CHEROKEE CT
A
511 CHEROKEE CT
A 0
004501009000 254 TORO AVE A 254 TORO AVE A 0
253131013000 229 SAN JUAN

GRADE RD A
229 SAN JUAN
GRADE RD A 1 10/21/2022 1
004301024000 1014 GARNER AVE
A
1014 GARNER AVE
A 0
004285010000 10 ST JOSEPH CIR
A
10 ST JOSEPH CIR
A 0
153052007000 604 ANDINA CIR A 604 ANDINA CIR A 0
153053001000 341 BARDIN RD A 341 BARDIN RD A 1 12/21/2022 1 004433017000 643 TOWT ST A 643 TOWT ST A 0
253212003000 13293 JACKSON ST
A
13293 JACKSON ST
A 0
153442031000 841 CHAMISE DR A 841 CHAMISE DR A 0
004023023000 534 FREMONT ST A 534 FREMONT ST A 0
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 11 12
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
78 0 1 0 0 0 153 232
Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 Project Identifier
004443056000 637 NEW DEAL ST
A
637 NEW DEAL ST
A 0
004122004000 17 POPLAR ST 17 POPLAR ST 0
003731013000 474 E LAUREL DR A 474 E LAUREL DR A 0
153362017000 935 LA MANCHA
WAY A
935 LA MANCHA
WAY A 0
261655011000 1767 CASCADE CT
A
1767 CASCADE CT
A 0
004152012000 118 VALENCIA ST A 118 VALENCIA ST A 0
153582014000 1117 FOX GLEN
WAY A
1117 FOX GLEN
WAY A 0
002631017000 227 KATHERINE
AVE A
227 KATHERINE
AVE A 0
004661031000 522 SUNRISE ST A 522 SUNRISE ST A 0
004105014000 805 EAST ST 805 EAST ST 0
261251004000 1421 PARSONS
AVE A
1421 PARSONS
AVE A 0
004143008000 143 LINDEN ST A 143 LINDEN ST A 0
153713062000 1289 PALERMO DR
A
1289 PALERMO DR
A 0
261582029000 1717 ALTURAS CIR
A
1717 ALTURAS CIR
A 0
003722012000 119 ROSARITA DR
A
119 ROSARITA DR
A 0
261481028000 1325 CHEROKEE
DR A
1325 CHEROKEE
DR A 0
002311019000 256 CLAY ST A 256 CLAY ST A 0
004436004000 1101 CORTEZ ST
AA
1101 CORTEZ ST
AA 0
004273018000
1405

GRANDHAVEN ST
A
1405 GRANDHAVEN
ST A 0
004383056000 1143 N SANBORN
RD A
1143 N SANBORN
RD A 0
004383056000 1143 N SANBORN
RD B
1143 N SANBORN
RD B 0
153222009000 1066 TWIN

CREEKS DR
1066 TWIN CREEKS
DR 0
002252017000 141 CENTRAL AVE
A
141 CENTRAL AVE
A 0
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 11 12
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
78 0 1 0 0 0 153 232
Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 Project Identifier
002285003000 820 W ALISAL ST A 820 W ALISAL ST A 0
002311010000 350 WEST ST B 350 WEST ST B 0
003352012000 24 N FOURTH ST 24 N FOURTH ST 0
261506012000 514 CALAVERAS
DR A
514 CALAVERAS DR
A 0
004161011000 21 KENTUCKY ST A 21 KENTUCKY ST A 0
004461004000 728 BURKE ST A 728 BURKE ST A 0
004641014000 1244 HILL TOP DR
A 1244 HILL TOP DR A 0
003523030000 1090 HARDING ST
A 1090 HARDING ST A 1 2/22/2022 1
004492007000 346 CROSS AVE 346 CROSS AVE 1 3/10/2022 1
004731013000 26 MIMBRERA CIR
A
26 MIMBRERA CIR
A 1 3/23/2022 1
003765021000 17 TULIP CIR 17 TULIP CIR 1 11/23/2022 1
004492008000 350 CROSS AVE A 350 CROSS AVE A 1 3/16/2022 1 261472009000 580 MARIPOSA ST
A
580 MARIPOSA ST
A 1 7/1/2022 1
261271011000 1423 ADAMS ST 1423 ADAMS ST 1 6/2/2022 1
153342012000 846 LA CUESTA CT 846 LA CUESTA CT 1 9/9/2022 1 003673024000 1342 RAMONA AVE 1342 RAMONA AVE 1 4/7/2022 1 253285012000 18690

EISENHOWER ST
18690
EISENHOWER ST 1 8/30/2022 1
261225002000 609 GLACIER DR A 609 GLACIER DR A 1 6/7/2022 1 261275002000 354 OSAGE DR A 354 OSAGE DR A 1 8/11/2022 1 211253009000 319 WESTMINSTER
DR A
319 WESTMINSTER
DR A 1 7/20/2022 1
261571036000 1503 BARCELONA
CIR A
1503 BARCELONA
CIR A 1 2/28/2022 1
261721021000 810 HOWE DR A 810 HOWE DR A 1 4/8/2022 1
004192015000 1266 FIRST AVE A 1266 FIRST AVE A 1 4/21/2022 1 261774011000 769 ALVARADO DR
A
769 ALVARADO DR
A 1 7/1/2022 1
004434012000 546 MAE AVE A 546 MAE AVE A 1 11/1/2022 1
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 11 12
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
78 0 1 0 0 0 153 232
Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 Project Identifier
261654002000 581 YOSEMITE
WAY A
581 YOSEMITE
WAY A 1 7/25/2022 1
261563020000 1611 ATHERTON
WY
1611 ATHERTON
WY 1 3/28/2022 1
004192058000 12 TOWT ST A 12 TOWT ST A 1 8/24/2022 1
002452004000 116 MAPLE ST A 116 MAPLE ST A 1 8/19/2022 1 004124002000 14 CEDAR ST A 14 CEDAR ST A 1 6/30/2022 1
003304023000 1218 POLK ST A 1218 POLK ST A 1 7/15/2022 1 003392018000 1340 N MAIN DR A 1340 N MAIN DR A 1 1/4/2022 1 004642001000 1274 SUMMIT DR A 1274 SUMMIT DR A 1 5/16/2022 1 002142001000 339 PARK ST 339 PARK ST 1 4/1/2022 1
002471052000 35 SANTA LUCIA
AVE
35 SANTA LUCIA
AVE 1 3/17/2022 1
004294004000 1216 ALMA AVE A 1216 ALMA AVE A 1 1/7/2022 1 003454024000 232 DIABLO DR 232 DIABLO DR 1 9/30/2022 1
002231006000 226 PAJARO ST 226 PAJARO ST 1 3/30/2022 1
002536020000 111 HAWTHORNE
ST
111 HAWTHORNE
ST 1 7/1/2022 1
002631053000 101 SAN JUAN DR
A 101 SAN JUAN DR A 1 3/14/2022 1
004242003000 1110 MONTANA ST 1110 MONTANA ST 1 4/11/2022 1 002902024000 854 FAIRMONT CIR 854 FAIRMONT CIR 1 2/17/2022 1 003372015000 222 DOUGLAS AVE
A
222 DOUGLAS AVE
A 1 3/25/2022 1
002223007000 324 SOLEDAD ST 324 SOLEDAD ST 1 9/21/2022 1 004433023000 611 TOWT ST A 611 TOWT ST A 1 4/15/2022 1
003652007000 440 CABRILLO AVE
A
440 CABRILLO AVE
A 1 4/11/2022 1
002141001000 343 ALEXANDER
ST A
343 ALEXANDER ST
A 1 8/4/2022 1
002141001000 347 ALEXANDER
ST A
347 ALEXANDER ST
A 1 8/5/2022 1
261372019000 1533 INYO CIR 1533 INYO CIR 1 5/19/2022 1
004502025000 229 MARGARET ST
A
229 MARGARET ST
A 1 6/2/2022 1
253111019000 2073 SANTA RITA
ST 130
2073 SANTA RITA
ST 130 1 6/15/2022 1
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 11 12
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
78 0 1 0 0 0 153 232
Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 Project Identifier
253111020000 2073 SANTA RITA
ST 86A
2073 SANTA RITA
ST 86A 1 6/15/2022 1
003252019000 255 MARYAL DR A 255 MARYAL DR A 1 7/21/2022 1 004111018000 43 EUCALYPTUS
DR A
43 EUCALYPTUS
DR A 1 5/12/2022 1
004451030000 701 TOWT ST 701 TOWT ST 1 4/8/2022 1
004163002000 63 MYRTLE CT 63 MYRTLE CT 1 8/22/2022 1
004342040000 704 GARNER AVE
10A
704 GARNER AVE
10A 1 7/25/2022 1
003743030000 1142 GRANADA
AVE A
1142 GRANADA
AVE A 1 10/21/2022 1
002082012000 16 CEDROS AVE 16 CEDROS AVE 1 5/16/2022 1
003304015000 1257 TYLER ST A 1257 TYLER ST A 1 6/1/2022 1 002455018000 37 PINE ST 37 PINE ST 1 10/26/2022 1
003831035000 46 LUNSFORD DR 46 LUNSFORD DR 5 4/26/2022 5 003773057000 1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A
1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A 40 11/16/2022 40
003773057000 1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A
1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A 38 1 1 11/23/2022 40
002455018000 37 PINE ST 37 PINE ST 1 11/8/2022 1
002233019001 301 MAIN ST 301 MAIN ST 49 10/25/2022 49
002341001000 300 MAIN ST 300 MAIN ST 19 10/25/2022 19
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
How many of the
units were
Extremely Low
Income? +
Was Project
APPROVED using
GC 65913.4(b)?
(SB 35 Streamlining)
Y/N
Infill Units?
Y/N +
Assistance Programs
for Each Development
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select multiple
- see instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
Deed Restriction (years)
(if affordable in perpetuity
enter 1000) +
Number of
Demolished/Dest
royed Units
Demolished or
Destroyed Units
Demolished/De
stroyed Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied to
the Project (Percentage
Increase in Total Allowable
Units or Total Maximum
Allowable Residential Gross
Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions, Waivers,
or Other Modifications
Given to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
43 0 45 0
261212014000
1443 MODOC AVE
A
1443 MODOC AVE
A 0 N
003663021000 1238 GRANADA
AVE A
1238 GRANADA
AVE A 0 N
002461011000 722 AVELAR ST A 722 AVELAR ST A 0 N
002423046000 307 GEIL ST 307 GEIL ST 0 N
004103011000 924 EAST ST A 924 EAST ST A 0 N
261816026000 537 STOCKTON ST
A
537 STOCKTON ST
A 0 N
261263005000 123 CHRISTENSEN
AVE
123 CHRISTENSEN
AVE 0 N
002456020000 119 PINE ST 119 PINE ST 0 N
261271004000 1343 ADAMS ST A 1343 ADAMS ST A 0 N
003262009000 230 NOICE DR A 230 NOICE DR A 0 N
261562011000 1624 ATHERTON
WAY
1624 ATHERTON
WAY 0 N
004072002000 47 N FILICE ST B 47 N FILICE ST B 0 N
004072002000 47 N FILICE ST A 47 N FILICE ST A 0 N
153571012000 1162 BOBCAT WAY
A
1162 BOBCAT WAY
A 0 N
003765003000 20 S FILICE ST A 20 S FILICE ST A 0 N
004492022000 302 CROSS AVE A 302 CROSS AVE A 0 N
003651017000 445 CABRILLO AVE
A
445 CABRILLO AVE
A 0 N
003761022000 85 MAGNOLIA DR A 85 MAGNOLIA DR A 0 N
004461006000 720 BURKE ST A 720 BURKE ST A 0 N 1 Demolished R 004252008000 1224 FAIRHAVEN
ST
1224 FAIRHAVEN
ST 0 N
002224026000 217 PAJARO ST A 217 PAJARO ST A 0 N
002083011000 629 MELROSE DR
A 629 MELROSE DR A 0 N
253182012000 18441

NORTHRIDGE DR
18441
NORTHRIDGE DR 0 N
004482024000 15 BARDIN CIR A 15 BARDIN CIR A 0 N
153551012000 833 CASTLETON
ST A
833 CASTLETON
ST A 0 N
004491014000 10 BARDIN RD 10 BARDIN RD 0 N
002531010000 36 PINE ST A 36 PINE ST A 0 N
016351029000 1148 LOYOLA DR 1148 LOYOLA DR 0 N
261212011000 1436 TAMPICO
AVE A
1436 TAMPICO AVE
A 0 N
261634022000 1532 SEPULVEDA
DR A
1532 SEPULVEDA
DR A 0 N
261307008000 1650 CAMBRIAN
DR A
1650 CAMBRIAN DR
A 0 N
004642006000 1254 SUMMIT DR A 1254 SUMMIT DR A 0 N
261571035000
1501 BARCELONA
CIR A
1501 BARCELONA
CIR A 0 N
004471007000 1422 DEL MONTE
AVE
1422 DEL MONTE
AVE 0 N
253283010000 12908 ARTHUR ST
A
12908 ARTHUR ST
A 0 N
261482017000 1306 CHEROKEE
DR A
1306 CHEROKEE
DR A 0 N
004424016000 1125 C ST A 1125 C ST A 0 N
004492002000 316 CROSS AVE A 316 CROSS AVE A 0 N
003871009000 649 JOHN ST A 649 JOHN ST A 0 N
261612025000 1511 DURAN ST A 1511 DURAN ST A 0 N
004142001000 1 LINDEN ST A 1 LINDEN ST A 0 N
002312028000 304 LORIMER ST A 304 LORIMER ST A 0 N
002221015000
235 SOLEDAD ST
1A
235 SOLEDAD ST
1A 0 N
004412023000 535 SUNRISE ST A 535 SUNRISE ST A 0 N
261491042000 554 YREKA DR A 554 YREKA DR A 0 N
004731010000
14 MIMBRERA CIR
A
14 MIMBRERA CIR
A 0 N
261444009000 1571 MENLO WAY
B
1571 MENLO WAY
B 0 N
004591035000 52 MAYFAIR DR A 52 MAYFAIR DR A 0 N
004261014000
107 MIDWAY AVE
A 107 MIDWAY AVE A 0 N
261503002000 551 YREKA DR A 551 YREKA DR A 0 N
004554007000 65 PALOMA AVE A 65 PALOMA AVE A 0 N
002501016000
305 ALAMEDA AVE
A
305 ALAMEDA AVE
A 0 N
004233013000 1031 MONTANA ST
A
1031 MONTANA ST
A 0 N
002532007000 126 PINE ST A 126 PINE ST A 0 N
003525008000 1071 POLK ST A 1071 POLK ST A 0 N
003525008000 1071 POLK ST B 1071 POLK ST B 0 N
004181015000 1229 SECOND AVE
A
1229 SECOND AVE
A 0 N
004592010000 128 MAYFAIR DR A 128 MAYFAIR DR A 0 N
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units Density Bonus Project Identifier Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
How many of the
units were
Extremely Low
Income? +
Was Project
APPROVED using
GC 65913.4(b)?
(SB 35 Streamlining)
Y/N
Infill Units?
Y/N +
Assistance Programs
for Each Development
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select multiple
- see instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
Deed Restriction (years)
(if affordable in perpetuity
enter 1000) +
Number of
Demolished/Dest
royed Units
Demolished or
Destroyed Units
Demolished/De
stroyed Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied to
the Project (Percentage
Increase in Total Allowable
Units or Total Maximum
Allowable Residential Gross
Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions, Waivers,
or Other Modifications
Given to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
43 0 45 0
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units Density Bonus Project Identifier 002422005000 229 LANG ST A 229 LANG ST A 0 N
003811023000 86 E BERNAL DR A 86 E BERNAL DR A 0 N
253131015000
119 SAN JUAN

GRADE RD A
119 SAN JUAN
GRADE RD A 0 N
211282004000 126 SUTTON WAY
A
126 SUTTON WAY
A 0 N
002141009000 42 WEST ST A 42 WEST ST A 0 N
261788002000 6 VAN NESS CIR A 6 VAN NESS CIR A 0 N
004443021000 640 DALLAS AVE A 640 DALLAS AVE A 0 N
003676005000
1321 TRAZADO
AVE A
1321 TRAZADO
AVE A 0 N
004731013000 26 MIMBRERA CIR
B
26 MIMBRERA CIR
B 0 N
002532015000 139 OAK ST A 139 OAK ST A 0 N
003652002000
414 CABRILLO AVE
A
414 CABRILLO AVE
A 0 N
003452014000 203 ANGELUS DR 203 ANGELUS DR 0 N
004381007000 1045 SIEBER ST 1045 SIEBER ST 0 N
004203004000 1418 FIRST AVE A 1418 FIRST AVE A 0 N
002394015000 49 HARVEST ST A 49 HARVEST ST A 0 N
003663004000
1249 RAMONA AVE
A
1249 RAMONA AVE
A 0 N
003743024000 1118 GRANADA
AVE A
1118 GRANADA
AVE A 0 N
003762002000 42 MAGNOLIA DR A 42 MAGNOLIA DR A 0 N
253063013000 104 E LAMAR ST A 104 E LAMAR ST A 0 N
004163015000
1136 E MARKET ST
A
1136 E MARKET ST
A 0 N
002122018000 524 ARCHER ST A 524 ARCHER ST A 0 N
004521007000
266 PALOMA AVE
A 266 PALOMA AVE A 0 N
004145008000 1121 CIRCLE DR 1121 CIRCLE DR 0 N
261551017000 1790 TAHOE DR B 1790 TAHOE DR B 0 N
261733009000 1006 FLINT CIR A 1006 FLINT CIR A 0 N
153502010000 1102 EAGLE DR A 1102 EAGLE DR A 0 N
261433008000
460 MENDOCINO
DR A
460 MENDOCINO
DR A 0 N
261721036000 1111 SHERMAN DR
A
1111 SHERMAN DR
A 0 N
004022001000 546 TERRACE ST
102
546 TERRACE ST
102 0 N
004383044000 1028 SIEBER ST 1028 SIEBER ST 0 N
004123009000 11 CEDAR ST A 11 CEDAR ST A 0 N
004123009000 11 CEDAR ST B 11 CEDAR ST B 0 N
153362017000
935 LA MANCHA
WAY B
935 LA MANCHA
WAY B 0 N
004101050000 33 N SANBORN RD 33 N SANBORN RD 0 N
003251013000 249 DORORO DR A 249 DORORO DR A 0 N
002353015000 446 SOLEDAD ST C 446 SOLEDAD ST C 0 N
016145017000
1244 VIA PARAISO
A
1244 VIA PARAISO
A 0 N
004401029000 761 GALINDO ST 761 GALINDO ST 0 N
261461004000 511 CHEROKEE CT
A
511 CHEROKEE CT
A 0 N
004501009000 254 TORO AVE A 254 TORO AVE A 0 N
253131013000 229 SAN JUAN

GRADE RD A
229 SAN JUAN
GRADE RD A 0 N
004301024000 1014 GARNER AVE
A
1014 GARNER AVE
A 0 N
004285010000 10 ST JOSEPH CIR
A
10 ST JOSEPH CIR
A 0 N
153052007000 604 ANDINA CIR A 604 ANDINA CIR A 0 N
153053001000 341 BARDIN RD A 341 BARDIN RD A 0 N
004433017000 643 TOWT ST A 643 TOWT ST A 0 N
253212003000
13293 JACKSON
ST A
13293 JACKSON ST
A 0 N
153442031000 841 CHAMISE DR A 841 CHAMISE DR A 0 N
004023023000
534 FREMONT ST
A 534 FREMONT ST A 0 N
004443056000 637 NEW DEAL ST
A
637 NEW DEAL ST
A 0 N
004122004000 17 POPLAR ST 17 POPLAR ST 0 N
003731013000
474 E LAUREL DR
A 474 E LAUREL DR A 0 N
153362017000 935 LA MANCHA
WAY A
935 LA MANCHA
WAY A 0 N
261655011000 1767 CASCADE CT
A
1767 CASCADE CT
A 0 N
004152012000 118 VALENCIA ST
A 118 VALENCIA ST A 0 N
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
How many of the
units were
Extremely Low
Income? +
Was Project
APPROVED using
GC 65913.4(b)?
(SB 35 Streamlining)
Y/N
Infill Units?
Y/N +
Assistance Programs
for Each Development
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select multiple
- see instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
Deed Restriction (years)
(if affordable in perpetuity
enter 1000) +
Number of
Demolished/Dest
royed Units
Demolished or
Destroyed Units
Demolished/De
stroyed Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied to
the Project (Percentage
Increase in Total Allowable
Units or Total Maximum
Allowable Residential Gross
Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions, Waivers,
or Other Modifications
Given to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
43 0 45 0
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units Density Bonus Project Identifier 153582014000 1117 FOX GLEN
WAY A
1117 FOX GLEN
WAY A 0 N
002631017000 227 KATHERINE
AVE A
227 KATHERINE
AVE A 0 N
004661031000 522 SUNRISE ST A 522 SUNRISE ST A 0 N
004105014000 805 EAST ST 805 EAST ST 0 N
261251004000
1421 PARSONS
AVE A
1421 PARSONS
AVE A 0 N
004143008000 143 LINDEN ST A 143 LINDEN ST A 0 N
153713062000
1289 PALERMO DR
A
1289 PALERMO DR
A 0 N
261582029000 1717 ALTURAS CIR
A
1717 ALTURAS CIR
A 0 N
003722012000 119 ROSARITA DR
A
119 ROSARITA DR
A 0 N
261481028000 1325 CHEROKEE
DR A
1325 CHEROKEE
DR A 0 N
002311019000 256 CLAY ST A 256 CLAY ST A 0 N
004436004000
1101 CORTEZ ST
AA
1101 CORTEZ ST
AA 0 N
004273018000
1405

GRANDHAVEN ST
A
1405

GRANDHAVEN ST
A
0 N
004383056000 1143 N SANBORN
RD A
1143 N SANBORN
RD A 0 N
004383056000 1143 N SANBORN
RD B
1143 N SANBORN
RD B 0 N
153222009000 1066 TWIN

CREEKS DR
1066 TWIN
CREEKS DR 0 N
002252017000 141 CENTRAL AVE
A
141 CENTRAL AVE
A 0 N
002285003000 820 W ALISAL ST A 820 W ALISAL ST A 0 N
002311010000 350 WEST ST B 350 WEST ST B 0 N
003352012000 24 N FOURTH ST 24 N FOURTH ST 0 N
261506012000
514 CALAVERAS
DR A
514 CALAVERAS
DR A 0 N
004161011000 21 KENTUCKY ST
A 21 KENTUCKY ST A 0 N
004461004000 728 BURKE ST A 728 BURKE ST A 0 N
004641014000
1244 HILL TOP DR
A
1244 HILL TOP DR
A 0 N
003523030000 1090 HARDING ST
A
1090 HARDING ST
A 0 N
004492007000 346 CROSS AVE 346 CROSS AVE 0 N
004731013000
26 MIMBRERA CIR
A
26 MIMBRERA CIR
A 0 N
003765021000 17 TULIP CIR 17 TULIP CIR 0 N
004492008000 350 CROSS AVE A 350 CROSS AVE A 0 N
261472009000
580 MARIPOSA ST
A
580 MARIPOSA ST
A 0 N
261271011000 1423 ADAMS ST 1423 ADAMS ST 0 N
153342012000 846 LA CUESTA CT 846 LA CUESTA CT 0 N
003673024000 1342 RAMONA AVE 1342 RAMONA AVE 0 N
253285012000
18690

EISENHOWER ST
18690
EISENHOWER ST 0 N
261225002000 609 GLACIER DR A 609 GLACIER DR A 0 N
261275002000 354 OSAGE DR A 354 OSAGE DR A 0 N
211253009000
319

WESTMINSTER DR
A
319 WESTMINSTER
DR A 0 N
261571036000 1503 BARCELONA
CIR A
1503 BARCELONA
CIR A 0 N
261721021000 810 HOWE DR A 810 HOWE DR A 0 N
004192015000 1266 FIRST AVE A 1266 FIRST AVE A 0 N
261774011000
769 ALVARADO DR
A
769 ALVARADO DR
A 0 N
004434012000 546 MAE AVE A 546 MAE AVE A 0 N
261654002000
581 YOSEMITE
WAY A
581 YOSEMITE
WAY A 0 N
261563020000 1611 ATHERTON
WY
1611 ATHERTON
WY 0 N
004192058000 12 TOWT ST A 12 TOWT ST A 0 N
002452004000 116 MAPLE ST A 116 MAPLE ST A 0 N
004124002000 14 CEDAR ST A 14 CEDAR ST A 0 N
003304023000 1218 POLK ST A 1218 POLK ST A 0 N
003392018000 1340 N MAIN DR A 1340 N MAIN DR A 0 N
004642001000 1274 SUMMIT DR A 1274 SUMMIT DR A 0 N
002142001000 339 PARK ST 339 PARK ST 0 N
002471052000
35 SANTA LUCIA
AVE
35 SANTA LUCIA
AVE 0 N
004294004000 1216 ALMA AVE A 1216 ALMA AVE A 0 N
003454024000 232 DIABLO DR 232 DIABLO DR 0 N
002231006000 226 PAJARO ST 226 PAJARO ST 0 N
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Current APN Street Address Project Name +
How many of the
units were
Extremely Low
Income? +
Was Project
APPROVED using
GC 65913.4(b)?
(SB 35 Streamlining)
Y/N
Infill Units?
Y/N +
Assistance Programs
for Each Development
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select multiple
- see instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
Deed Restriction (years)
(if affordable in perpetuity
enter 1000) +
Number of
Demolished/Dest
royed Units
Demolished or
Destroyed Units
Demolished/De
stroyed Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied to
the Project (Percentage
Increase in Total Allowable
Units or Total Maximum
Allowable Residential Gross
Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions, Waivers,
or Other Modifications
Given to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
43 0 45 0
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units Density Bonus Project Identifier 002536020000 111 HAWTHORNE
ST
111 HAWTHORNE
ST 0 N
002631053000 101 SAN JUAN DR
A
101 SAN JUAN DR
A 0 N
004242003000 1110 MONTANA ST 1110 MONTANA ST 0 N
002902024000 854 FAIRMONT CIR 854 FAIRMONT CIR 0 N
003372015000
222 DOUGLAS AVE
A
222 DOUGLAS AVE
A 0 N
002223007000 324 SOLEDAD ST 324 SOLEDAD ST 0 N
004433023000 611 TOWT ST A 611 TOWT ST A 0 N
003652007000
440 CABRILLO AVE
A
440 CABRILLO AVE
A 0 N
002141001000 343 ALEXANDER
ST A
343 ALEXANDER
ST A 0 N
002141001000 347 ALEXANDER
ST A
347 ALEXANDER
ST A 0 N
261372019000 1533 INYO CIR 1533 INYO CIR 0 N
004502025000
229 MARGARET ST
A
229 MARGARET ST
A 0 N
253111019000 2073 SANTA RITA
ST 130
2073 SANTA RITA
ST 130 0 N
253111020000 2073 SANTA RITA
ST 86A
2073 SANTA RITA
ST 86A 0 N
003252019000 255 MARYAL DR A 255 MARYAL DR A 0 N
004111018000
43 EUCALYPTUS
DR A
43 EUCALYPTUS
DR A 0 N
004451030000 701 TOWT ST 701 TOWT ST 0 N
004163002000 63 MYRTLE CT 63 MYRTLE CT 0 N
004342040000
704 GARNER AVE
10A
704 GARNER AVE
10A 0 N
003743030000 1142 GRANADA
AVE A
1142 GRANADA
AVE A 0 N
002082012000 16 CEDROS AVE 16 CEDROS AVE 0 N
003304015000 1257 TYLER ST A 1257 TYLER ST A 0 N
002455018000 37 PINE ST 37 PINE ST 0 N
003831035000 46 LUNSFORD DR 46 LUNSFORD DR 0 N
003773057000
1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A
1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A 23 N HOME, Other DB 55 22 Demolished R 65.0% 3
On-Site
Improvements,
Development
Standards
Modification
Yes
003773057000 1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A
1112 PARKSIDE ST
C/A 20 N HOME, Other DB 55 22 Demolished R 65.0% 3
On-Site
Improvements,
Development
Standards
Modification
Yes
002455018000 37 PINE ST 37 PINE ST 0 N
002233019001 301 MAIN ST 301 MAIN ST 0 N
002341001000 300 MAIN ST 300 MAIN ST 0 N
Jurisdiction SALINAS ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
1 Projection Period 3 4
RHNA Allocation by
Income Level Projection Period 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 20 23 Total Units to Date (all years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by Income
Level
Deed Restricted 21 - 24 50 42 - - 88 - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted 20 - 16 - 53 8 - 1 - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted 6 - 1 3 - - - - - - Above Moderate 934 89 53 52 25 71 100 210 18 9 139 - 928 6 2,229
136 53 93 78 166 108 210 278 139 - 1,261 968 5 6 7
Extremely low-Income
Need 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Units to Date
Total Units
Remaining
269 - - - 30 - - 43 - - 73 196 Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected].
397
225
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs.
10 Moderate
537
351
407
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 98 2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
312
253
Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted since the start of the planning period. Projection Period units are in a separate column.

Total RHNA
Total Units
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Extremely Low-Income Units*
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income RHNA progress and must be reported as very low-income units in section 7 of Table A2. They must also be reported in the extremely low-income category (section 13) in Table A2 to be counted as progress toward meeting the extremely low-income housing need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). *Extremely low-income houisng need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). Value in Section 5 is default value, assumed to be half of the very low-income RHNA. May be overwritten.

Progress toward extremely low-income housing need, as determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1).

Jurisdiction SALINAS ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Date of Rezone Rezone Type
2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
APN Street Address Project Name +
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID +
Date of Rezone Very Low-
Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Above Moderate-
Income
Rezone Type Parcel Size
(Acres)
General Plan
Designation Zoning Minimum
Density Allowed
Maximum
Density Allowed
Realistic
Capacity Vacant/Nonvacant Description of Existing
Uses
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
83 Project Identifier RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category Sites Description 1 Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need and No Net-Loss Law Table C
Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation H-1. Provision of Adequate
Sites
Maintain an inventory of sites at adequate
densities and appropriate development
standards to facilitate a range of housing
opportunities.

Ongoing The City maintains an active inventory of potential sites for housing opportunities as indicated below:

1.General Plan Housing Element 2015-2023 contains an inventory of sites at adequate densities and appropriate development standards to help accomplish our Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) goals.

2. The City's Housing Division collaborates with the County of Monterey to maintaining an inventory of affordable housing units and rental properties throughout the County of Monterey.

3.The City's Housing Division updates and maintains an internal inventory of homeless shelters, total beds, and available beds for Monterey County and San Benito County.

4.Through the Farmworker Housing Study and Action Plan, the City finalized a map that identifies potential parcels for development within City limits for affordable housing projects.

5. Through the Surplus Land Act, the City is making City own properties available for development.

H-1. Provision of Adequate
Sites
Continue to maintain requirement on
previously identified sites located in the
Focused Growth Overlay district which can
accommodate residential and mixed use
developments with a minimum of 30 du
per acre as a non-discretionary permitted
use.

Ongoing The City continues to maintain the 30 DUs per acre as a non-discretionary permitted use in the previously identified sites located within the Focused Growth Overlay districts. The Central Area Specific Plan and the West Area Specific Plans have been approved by City Council.

H-1. Provision of Adequate
Sites
Report to the City Council annually on the
City’s progress in meeting its RHNA.

Ongoing The City continues to report annually to City Council on the City's progress in meeting its RHNA numbers. The City has submitted timely reports on RHNA since the Housing Element adoption and has proposed to take the 2022 Housing Element Annual Progress Report to City Council on March 7, 2023 for approval. The City proposes to use its SB-2 planning grant to change zoning in order to expand the potential housing opportunities in the City ahead of the completion of the General Plan Update to help meet the City's RHNA.

Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-1. Provision of Adequate
Sites
Continue to consult with affordable
housing developers to identify any
additional sites, which may be considered
appropriate for affordable housing
development.

Ongoing The City issues an annual Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for its federal and state funds. From the federal entitlement funds in 2021, the City made available Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) for developers to apply. From the state funds, the City made available Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funds. An informational workshop is conducted annually to provide developers technical assistance with the application.

H-2. Monitoring of
Development Fees
Annually review the City’s planning and
development fees to ensure they are
appropriate and do not unduly constrain
affordable housing development
Every year On April 12, 2022, the City increased the development impact fees in accordance with the Engineering News Record (ENR)Construction Cost Index (CCI). The City's ENR CCI increased between January 1, 2021 and January 1, 2022 by 8%. All impact fees were increased by this percentage. The Fire Department is currently evaluating their Fire Mitigation Fees and recommendation will be proposed in 2023.

To alleviate, unduly constraints on affordable housing development, the City processes Fee Deferral Agreements (FDA) for affordable housing projects.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-2. Monitoring of
Development Fees
As funding permits, assist in gap financing
affordable development by nonprofit
developers to help offset the cost of
development.

Ongoing Through the Annual Action Plan (AAP), the City released a portion of its federal entitlement HOME and CDBG funds, as well as ARPA (federal) and PLHA (state) funds. These funds were available for affordable housing developers as gap financing for the proposed affordable housing projects.

1. Phase I of Parkside Manor, a 80-unit affordable development by the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM), received HOME and PLHA funding along with a fee deferral for the development impact fees. A grand total of $2,108,987. As of December 2022 project was completed.

2. The Catalyst Apartments, a 5-unit affordable rehabilitation project received $500,000 of CDBG funds in gap financing. In 2022, the non-profit developer, Interim Inc. completed the construction.

3. The Sun Rose Apartments, an 11-unit affordable development received $500,000 of CDBG funds in gap financing and an additional $500,000 Housing Successory Funds (HSA) for construction budget deficit . The City allocated the HSA funds in December of 2022. The City provided a grand total of $1,000,000 in gap financing. As of December 2022, this project was 90% complete and has tentative completion date of March 2023.

4. The Step up on Sanborn Project, a permanent supportive housing project in collaboration with Shangri-La and Step Up, the City committed $1,014,000 in PLHA funds and $1,300,000 in HOME ARP funds for supportive services and rental subsidies for a grand total of $2,314,000 in assistance.

5. The Step up on Fairview Project, a permanent supportive housing project in collaboration with Shangri-La and Set Up, the City committed $220,000 in PLHA funds and $1,000,000 in HOME ARP funds for supportive services and rental subsidies for a grand total of $1,220,000 in assistance.

H-3. Housing Services
Program
Continue to advertise the program through
various media, including brochures,
bilingual public service announcements on
radio, inclusion in service directories, the
City website, and postings at the City
libraries and Permit Center.

Ongoing Information about the Housing Services Program is available through the City's website. The Housing Division maintains an active interest list and also collaborates with Code Enforcement when residents are referred to the program. A range of platforms are used to inform residents about this program including: social media posts, community outreach meetings, and printed material available at the Permit Center.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-3. Housing Services
Program
Annual objectives:
-Housing Rehabilitation Loans – five
households
-Housing Accessibility Assistance Grants
– three households
-Energy Efficiency Improvements – ten
households
Every year Due to Covid-19 pandemic, the City scaled back its Housing Services Programs funded with the City's Federal Entitlement CDBG Program for low-income households in 2020, 2021 and 2022 to focus on emergency response services. In 2022, there were no households assisted through the Housing Services Programs. The Housing Services Program has been suspended until further notice. Once the pandemic is under control, the City will re-evaluate the HSP and re-engage with the residents and community partners.

Prior to 2020, the City had City funded Grid Alternatives (GA) for solar upgrades to low- income households. Unfortunately, GA relocated operations to Fresno and is no longer serving the Salinas and/or Monterey County area. The City has not being able to identify another vendor that could provide energy efficiency improvements. No households were assisted with energy efficiency improvements in 2022.

H-3. Housing Services
Program
Leverage auxiliary programs that
compliment HSP services by coordinating
with program providers and integrating
those programs into HSP outreach.

Ongoing The City of Salinas Outreach and Response (SORT) Team funded by HUD ESG & CBG program disseminates and provides auxiliary and direct referral services to unsheltered resident. The SORT team provides auxiliary program through the following homeless services providers: CSUMB CHE, Interim MCHOME and Central Coast Center for Independent Living.

The Housing Resource Center and Monterey County Health Department are a good source of referrals. Partners working specifically with the disabled include Interim Inc., Alliance on Aging, Central Coast Center for Independent Living, and Deaf and Hard of Hearing Service Center.

H-3. Housing Services
Program
Educate community partners, including
housing and disability advocates, about
HSP available services and engage them
in outreach efforts.

Ongoing The City scaled back its HSP in 2020, 2021 and 2022 to focus on emergency response services during the pandemic. Once the pandemic is under control, the City will re-evaluate the HSP and re-engage with community partners on the education and dissemination of information regarding the HSP.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-4. Code Enforcement Continue to operate an effective Code Enforcement Program, with the objective
of transitioning to comprehensive code
enforcement by 2021, subject to
availability of resources.

Ongoing The Code Enforcement Division opened 1,349 cases and closed 1,260 cases in the 2022 calendar year. The division reimplemented a proactive enforcement approach in certain areas of the city that have had high case rates. During 2022, there were 2 cases where a local judge appointed a receiver to remediate violations or made a stipulation that a receiver would be appointed in a stayed capacity should the responsible party fail to bring the property into compliance. Staff continues to work with outside counsel for alternate approaches to enforcement when property owners fail to comply.

H-4. Code Enforcement Refer potentially income-qualified property owners to the City’s Housing Services
Program for rehabilitation assistance.

Ongoing Code Enforcement staff refer residents to the Housing Services Program by providing them a bilingual guide to City programs and regulations. Information is also provided to property owners and neighborhood group leaders on a case-by-case basis.

H-4. Code Enforcement Establish process to engage community partners and residents in development of a
comprehensive housing inspection
program.

Ongoing The Housing Policy Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) resumed Rental Registration Program discussions in April 2021 through December 2022. This involved a total of five meetings and two meetings with stakeholders to collect vital feedback that will shape the design of the program. Code Enforcement will be able to use the Rental Registration data to contact property owners and managers in the case of violations or emergencies. In 2022, the City staff drafted a Rental Registration Ordinace and will to City Council in April 2023.

H-4. Code Enforcement Continue periodic analysis of code enforcement data to enhance program
effectiveness, especially for housing
violations.

Ongoing Code Enforcement Staff meets weekly and periodically to review their case data on housing violations and provides reports to City Council on a monthly basis. This monthly report includes data on cases processed, citations issued, and highlights key successes.

H-5. Alisal Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy Area
(ANRSA)
Pursue recertification of the Alisal NRSA
every five years and update the
implementation strategies to reflect
housing and community development
needs.
2020 The City's Alisal Neighborhood Revitalization Strategize Area (ANRSA) was recertified and approved by HUD as part of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-24 Consolidated Plan in November 2020. The Alisal Vibrancy Plan (AVP) has the same exact boundary as the ANRSA, and the AVP crafted priority policies and actions. In 2021, the City continued to fund the positions for a Business Navigator and a Housing Analyst to address fair housing issues throughout the City.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-5. Alisal Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy Area
(ANRSA)
Expand marketing efforts in the Alisal
NRSA to promote housing and community
development programs to Alisal residents.

Ongoing The City is using CARE Act monies to fund a Housing Analyst and Business Navigator, key recommendations of the Alisal Vibrancy Plan. In 2022, the Business Navigator has worked jointly with the Salinas United Business Association by:

1) Continuing to provide outreach and technical assistance for federal, state, and local financial relief programs and webinars.
2) Engaging Alisal businesses in community events like CICLOVIA & Dia Del Nino to participate in a shop local initiative resulting in the engagement of thousands of consumers in the Alisal District.
3) Managing the Small Business phone and email hotline fielding and assisting over 178 calls and 222 emails and in person appointments.
4) In April of 2022, the City finalized 22 CDBG Grant Agreements with local businesses. In total, the City distributed $400,000 of CDBG Entitlement/CDBG-CV funds to assist local businesses with rent and utilities due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-5. Alisal Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy Area
(ANRSA)
Pursue funding strategies such as the
Community Revitalization and Investment
Authority (AB 2) that focus on addressing
distressed conditions in disadvantaged
communities.

Ongoing Although the City has not pursued the establishment of a CRIA through AB2, the City has continued to pursue funding that focuses on addressing distressed conditions in disadvantaged communities. The City is aggressively targeting its CDBG, CDBG-CV, HOME, ESG-CV, ESG, HCD ESG, HCD ESG-CV, CoC HHAP, United Way ERAP, County ARPA and HCD Homekey funding to address distressed conditions in disadvantaged communities. The City funded the following activities/programs in 2022:
1) ERAP Rental and Utility Assistance; 2) Salinas Downtown Streets Team; 3) Grow Salinas Fund; 4) Fair Housing Referral Services; 5) Hotel and Motel Vouchers for Homeless; 6) Street Outreach Team; 7) Salinas Homekey Project; 8) Chinatown Navigation Center, Trailers, and Sprung Operations; 9) Rapid Rehousing; and 10) SHARE Center Operations.

The City is implementing the Alisal Greening and Beautification Project to improve the cleanliness and appearance of the Alisal corridor with the addition of public art, banners, signage, trees, and pedestrian amenities through Caltrans Clean California Local Grant Program. In 2022 Requests for Proposals were issued the preparation of a Alisal District Identity Master Plan which will guide project design. Consultant teams were selected and began design work for park and recreation facility improvements at Closter Park, El Gabilan Park and the construction of a new Hebbron Family Center, which are key amenities service Alisal residents.

H-5. Alisal Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy Area
(ANRSA)
Pursue additional local, state, and federal
funding and strive to exceed the objectives
outlined in the Alisal NRSA:

Ongoing The City allocated federal entitlement funds to support objectives outlined in the ANRSA. The City has allocated funding to:
1) The Alisal Union School District for the Early Childhood Development Center in the amount of $880,000.
2) Grow Salinas Fund has not been recapitalized and are unable to povide additional funding at this time.
3) The Library and Public Services Department for the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Restoration Project in the amount of $401,882.
4) The HSP has been suspended until further notice. Once the pandemic is under control, the City will re-evaluate the HSP and re-engage with residents and community partners about how the program should be re-structure to assist with emergency response services.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-5. Alisal Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy Area
(ANRSA)
Public Services: Engage in capacity-
building activities to identify entities that
can be organized as CBDO to provide
services targeted for the Alisal NRSA, with
the objective of establishing at least one
CBDO by 2017.
2017 Community Development Department (CDD) staff engaged various developers and non-profit organizations through the 2022 Housing & Development Forum on topics related to capacity building, development opportunities, zoning updates, and city land disposition. CDD staff will continue to engage developers and non-profit organizations to increase interest and participation in establishing a CBDO within City limits. In the Spring of 2022, the City hosted a housing forum with multiple developers on housing opprtunities for development.

H-5. Alisal Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy Area
(ANRSA)
Residential Rehabilitation: Raise the
qualifying income level for rehabilitation
assistance to 100 percent of the AMI by
2016.
2016 Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the City prioritized covid-related activities and funding. The Housing Service Program has been suspened until further notice thus the City had no activities related to housing rehabilitation assistance in 2022.

In the future, the City will re-evaluate the Housing Services Program, which may provide residential rehabilitation assistance to focus on emergency repairs to reach more residents and help stabilize the loss of housing stock. In this re-evaluation, the City may also identify funding sources that could potentially allow for the program to assist households at 100% AMI.

H-5. Alisal Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy Area
(ANRSA)
Expand marketing of housing rehabilitation
assistance with the objective of assisting
to 10 households over five years. This
equates to 25 percent of the City’s overall
goal of housing rehabilitation loan
assistance for the entire City.

Ongoing The City's Housing Services Program, which includes rehabilitation assistance, is being re-evaluated. After the new program is crafted and approved by City Council, the Housing Division staff will create a marketing plan to implement the program.

H-5. Alisal Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy Area
(ANRSA)
Continue to promote accessibility grants
through City website, contractors, libraries
and public service agencies.

Ongoing Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the City prioritized covid-related activities and funding. In 2022, the City did not have activities related to housing accessibility grants and will re-evaluate the following year.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-6. Preservation of At-Risk
Housing
Prioritize the status of at-risk units through
contacts with the property owner(s).

Ongoing Section 3.7.4 of the Housing Element identified six projects with potential expiration of rent subsidies. The City is available to explore alternatives with at-risk properties on a case-by- case basis. In 2022 the affordabilty period for Las Casas de Madera, a multi- family affordable project, expired reducing the stock of affordable housing by 75 units.

In 2021, Interim Inc, a non-profit developer, decided to demolish Soledad House, an 8- bedroom house which was funded with HOME funds. The affordability restrictions for Soledad House were transferred into the new 11-unit affordable housing development now known as Sun Rose Apartments. This project is 90% complete with an estimated completion of Summer 2023.

H-6. Preservation of At-Risk
Housing
Encourage participation of nonprofit
housing developers to acquire and
preserve at-risk units.

Ongoing The City is available to explore alternatives with at-risk properties on a case-by- case basis. In 2022, the City made its 2022 funds available through the the CDBG, HOME, HOME ARP, PLHA, HSA and ARPA funds available to developers to acquire and preserve at-risk units.

In 2021, the Parkside Manor - Phase I was awarded HOME and PLHA funds and this allowed the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey to preserve affordable units.

Phase I of this project demolished 48 units and rebuilt 80 brand new housing units. As of December 2022, Phase 1 of this project was 95% complete and has a grand opening schedule for January 2023.

In 2022, the City assisted with the acquisition of two homekey projects (Step up on Sanborn and Step Up on Fairview) in collaboration with Shangri-La (For Profit) and Step Up on Second Street (Non-profit) for the creation of 99 new permanent supportive housing units and 2 manager units.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-6. Preservation of At-Risk
Housing
Work with property owner(s) intending to
opt out of the affordability covenants to
ensure tenants receive adequate notice.

Ongoing On a case-by-case bases, the City will collaborate with partner agencies and developers when a development is going to lose the affordability restrictions so that tenants receive advance notices and fair housing assistance. In 2022, one project lost its affordability restrictions. The City will engage with the property owner/developer to renew the affordability restriction by providing additional funds toward any potential rehabilitation activies of the project.

If the property owner/developer opts out from renewing affordability resctrictions, the City will collaborate with the owner/developer to ensure notices are served to the tenants.

Additionally, the City created a more robust fair housing program. The City hired a five- year Limited-Term Community Development Analyst to oversee the fair housing program and continue to collaborate with Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity (ECHO) and the Watsonville Law Center (WLC).

H-6. Preservation of At-Risk
Housing
Work with potential purchasers, ensure
the education of tenants of their rights,
and that tenants have assistance to
pursue other housing options, within 60
days of notice of intent to convert at-risk
units to market rate rents.

Ongoing In 2022, the City created a more robust fair housing program by hiring a five-year Limited-Term Community Development Analyst that will serve as navigator between the residents/landlords and ECHO and WLC. With this new collaboration, the City will be better equipped to assist new owners and existing residents to ensure their legal rights are protected when a 60 days of notice of intent to convert at-risk units to market rate rents is served.

H-7. Historic Resources Promote tax credits available for historic preservation through a Mills Act program
Ongoing On June 28, 2016, the City Council approved a Mills Act Program Ordinance for designated historic properties for five years. This program continues to be in effect until 2022 and will likely be extended. The City continues to promote the tax savings program to property owners through different channels (City website, permit center, working groups, etc.).

H-7. Historic Resources Provide technical assistance to property owners, and help identify grant and
funding opportunities, when available for
preservation and rehabilitation activities.

Ongoing The City’s Historic Resources Board (HRB) Coordinator is available to provide information to owners of historic properties and responds to inquiries. The HRB Coordinator will promote tax saving opportunities (continue the Mills Act Program) and other grant sources to property owners when available. The City will continue to look and identify grant funding opportunities to assist with preservation and rehabilitation of historic properties.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-8. Inclusionary Housing Complete update to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and nexus study by
2016.
2016 The updated Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, Guidelines and residential Nexus Study were completed in 2017. In September 2022, City Council had a study session to review the inclusionary ordinance. This study sesssion engaged public organizations, residents and developers. Subsequent to this study session on November 2022, City Council amended a portion of the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance to limit those projects which are exempt from the Ordinance’s requirements. Specifically, the proposed Ordinance eliminates the exemption for new residential development projects within the Central City Overlay District that do not qualify as adaptive reuse projects. In addition, City Council directed City staff to update the 2017 ordinance. City staff will be working in updating the ordinance in 2023.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Continue to promote density bonus,
inclusionary units, and other incentives to
facilitate affordable housing development.

Ongoing City housing staff collaborated with developers to promote the Density Bonus Ordinance, Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, and other incentives for affordable housing developments by providing gap funding. In 2022, the City reviewed 10 projects that were subject to the inclusionary housing ordinance and is actively working with developers to promote inclusionary housing ordinance and bonus density. Below are the 2022 projects received gap financing and will produced density bonus and inclusionary housing units:
1) The Sun Rose Apartments, an 11 unit development with 2 density bonus units.

Currently in construction and expected to be completed by Summer of 2023. 2) The Parkside Manor Apartments Phase 1, an 100% affordable senior housing project, demolished 48 units and replaced with 80 new housing units. This project obtained a 67% density bonus and 3 concessions. Construction was finalized in December of 2022.
3) A property at the intersection of Boronda Rd. and Hemmingway Dr. is being proposed by Stonebridge Homes Inc. and the development is set to construct 1,053 ownership units and 500 rental units. A portion of these units will be regulated by the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. This project is currently working towards obtaining its entitlement.
4) A property at the intersection of John St. and Abbott St. is being proposed by Uni- Kool Partners and the development is set as a mixed use project that will include 233 residential units. A portion of these units will be regulated by the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. This project is currently working towards obtaining its entitlement. 5) A property at 467 Market St is being proposed by Workbench and the development is set to construct 84 units. A portion of these units will be regulated by the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. This project is currently working towards obtaining its entitlement.
6) City awarded $500K to Eden Housing, Developer, for predevelopment cost of a 100% affordable multifamily rental project. Proposal is for 132 units for low and very low income residents.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Encourage developers to assist in site
identification.

Ongoing In 2022, the City collaborated with developers to identify city-owned parcels, including surface parking lots through the Surplus Land Act for potential housing developments.

The City received 1 letters of interest and the proposal is under consideration.

CDD staff meet quarterly with the Farmworker Housing Oversight Committee about potential new projects and possible opportunity sites for farmworker house projects. In November of 2022, the stakeholders and oversight committee prioritize the identification of suitable site and funding sources for affordable housing developments.

H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Work closely with qualified Community
Housing Development Organizations
(CHDOs) and other nonprofit housing
developers to expand affordable housing
opportunities. Assist in gap-financing and
funding applications for affordable
housing.

Ongoing In 2022, the City released the CHDO certification application and received two applications. The City completed its review and determined MidPend Housing Inc. met the certification qualifications. The second applicant did not meet the qualifications, but was encouraged to re-apply. City are in the process of updating the CHDO certification application to make it available year-round and on a rolling basis.

In 2022, the City of Salinas experienced a slow down in the production of affordable housing projects. Yet, the City was able to award additional HSA funds ($500,000) as gap financing to Interim Inc. (non-profit developers) for Sun Rose Apartments project.

H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Prioritize funding allocation to affordable
housing projects that include units
affordable to extremely low income
households.

Ongoing The City continued to prioritize funding for affordable housing projects to extremely low income households. The previously described projects:

Parkside Manor - Phase I, Catalyst Apartments, Sun Rose Apartments, Step Up on Fairview, Step Up on Sanborn, and Step Up in Salinas.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Continue to seek unique partnerships and
regularly meet with other agencies and
housing developers to discuss
opportunities for providing affordable
housing and improving community and
neighborhood conditions.

Ongoing In 2022, the Housing Division staff and the Community Development Director regularly met with the Coalition of Homeless Service Providers’ Housing Pipeline/Funding Action Team and Leadership Council, Continuum of Care (CoC) of Monterey County, Monterey Bay Economic Partnership (MBEP) and other regional agencies. City staff also attended the Housing Pipeline meetings to discuss the housing needs in Monterey County, focusing on building homes for low-income households and improving community and neighborhood conditions.

City with collabortion with the County of Monterey released an RFP for affordable housing project. Developer, Eden Housing was selected and proposed a 100% affordable multifamily rental project. Project is for 132 units for low and very low income households. City awarded $500K in gap financing for pre-development costs.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Participate in regional/multi-jurisdictional
agreements and activities to facilitate
housing development in the region.

Ongoing The City’s participates in the below regional/multi-jurisdictional agreements and activities that facilitates house development in the region:
1) Monterey Bay Economic Partnership’s (MBEP) Housing Work Group, which was created to expand housing in the tri-county region (Monterey, Santa Cruz and San Benito).
2) Farmworker Housing Study and Action Plan Oversight Committee works in the implementation of the farmworker housing study and it involves governmental agencies, non-profit organizations, community partners, labor contractors and farmers for the Salinas and Pajaro Valleys.
3) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was amended June 2021 between the City and the Monterey County for the development of a year-round navigation center and 100% affordable multifamily rental housing projects. As a result of this collaboration, the SHARE Center was constructed and placed in operation providing 100 beds for the unsheltered. In addition, the City and County released a RFQ in 2022 and selected Eden Housing Inc. as the developer for the affordable housing project. The City is projecting the execution of the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) and ARPA Grant Funding Agreement in early 2023.
4) Alisal MOU was executed on November 2022 between the City and County in relation to the ANRSA with a focus on the following 3 activities: 1) master planning the development of City and County owned property, with a primary focus on affordable housing, 2) establishing a trail network connecting City and County facilities and amenities, and 3) the expansion of health and mental health services in the Alisal. This collaboration is assisting in the implementation of strategies to assist in the housing and community development needs of our City.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Monitor the State Department of Housing
and Community Development's Notices of
Funding Availability (NOFA) and, where
appropriate, prepare or support
applications for funding for affordable
housing for the lower income households
(especially those with extremely low
incomes), farmworkers, persons with
disabilities, (including those with
developmental disabilities), seniors,
elderly, large households, and the
homeless.

Ongoing Community Development staff continues to monitor and respond to State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Notices of Funding Availability (NOFA). In May 2022, City staff attended the HCD Multifamily Finance Super NOFA workshop.

The City responded to the following 6 NOFAs and was awarded the following amounts:
1) The City was designated by the CoC as the regional Administrative Entity for HCD Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG). The City was awarded $258,964 in fund from HCD 2021 Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG). The City also submitted an application to HCD for the 2022 ESG Program and the funds that are projected to be receive are $269,709.
2) On November 3, 2022, following the issuance of an expenditure deadline extension to September 30, 2023, HCD advised the City that it was identified as one of few jurisdictions identified to receive an additional $150,000 in CoC ESG-CV funding specific to the provision of rapid rehousing activities and supports. The City submitted an substancial amendment to HCD requesting this funding. 3) In October 2022 the City submitted an application for the 3rd year of Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program from HCD. It is expected, that the City will be awarded $1,722,182.
4) In August of 2022, the City was awarded $647,451.33 from the Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP)- Round 1 & 2 funds from United Way Monterey Count. 5) In April of 2022, City staff applied for Family Homeless Challenge Grant seeking $5.5 million in Round 1 and access to an additional $5.5 in available future Round 2 funds. The City was awarded $2,668,383 in round 1 from the State of California Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency.
6) In April 2022, the City was awarded the Encampment Resolution Grant in the amount of $4,079,416.72. The funds came from the State of California Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Continue current efforts to streamline and
improve efficiencies in planning and permit
approval and building inspection service.

Continue City staff support to affordable
housing developers through the
entitlements and development process.

Ongoing Through the Kaizen, the City continued to improvements its permit process and building inspections. Procedures and operations have benefitted from focused analysis and implementation of recommendations over the past several years, creating the Building Specialist position to pre-screen application for completeness and reduce the number of resubmittals. In 2022, City staff released a pilot paperless permitting software to be tested by frequent applicants. With the sucess of the pilot program, City staff recommended implementation of the software for February 2023.

City Housing Division staff provides technical assistance to prospective affordable housing developers and review and approve HUD NEPA's for federrally funded projects. The Current Plannind Division oversee Development Review Committee applicatn meetings to help expedite affordable housing projects that are in the pipeline.

H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Expand the City’s affordable housing
inventory by a minimum of 700 units (50
extremely low, 100 very low, 150 low, and
400 moderate income units) by 2023.

Ongoing The City continues to support projects and the development of affordable housing through policy and entitlement processing. As of 2021, the City's affordable housing inventory is currently at 204 very low income units, 78 low income units, and 4 moderate income units.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Coordinate with the City’s Public Works
Department, MST, and TAMC to better
align the development of high quality
transit and future housing.

Ongoing Current Planning continues to meet with TAMC on the development of the platform project to bring Cal Train passenger rail service to Salinas.

In 2022,the City is participating in the MST led Transit-Oriented Development Planning Study (TOD-PS). This study is focused on promoting Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) and multimodal improvements in four study areas in the County of Monterey, including East Alisal Street. The report will review the findings of the land use and transportation evaluations to develop a high-level summary of TOD opportunities and constraints for each of the study areas.

The City participated in the MST led comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) which was used to develop the Better Bus Network. The COA made recommendations to change route alignment and bus stops to provide a wider geographic coverage and increase service frequencies on high ridership lines. The City installed new bus zones and landings for the new Better Bus Network stops.

The City issued a request for proposals for the Alisal Streetscape Masterplan to build upon the work from the Alisal Vibrancy Plan and East Alisal Street Corridor Plan, and refine the street corridor concepts further into more tangible final streetscape concepts.

H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Coordinate with the City’s Public Works
Department, Transportation Agency of
Monterey County (TAMC), and MST to
target funding for public, transit, bike, and
pedestrian infrastructure investment for
the development of high quality transit
corridors in order to leverage new Cap and
Trade Affordable Housing funding.

Ongoing In 2022 TAMC completed Package 1 improvements that include the extension of Lincoln Avenue into the ITC and parking lot improvements including, circulation, bus stalls, lighting, landscaping and pedestrian amenities such as bike racks, bus shelters and benches. Improvements are to support the ITC as a transit facility that would serve as a stop for train service to locations outside of the region, as well as regional bus service. The property was transferred to the City in December 2022. APPI (PPI) staff continues to work on Environmental reviews of properties that will be rezone with SB2 grant funding.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-9. Affordable Housing
Development
Review Zoning Code and revise as
necessary to promote alternative housing
solutions (e.g. transit-oriented
development, SRO, small houses, co-
housing/co-living, etc.).

Ongoing The City reviewed the zoning code through the following updates/projects:
1)APPI (PPI) staff continues to work with consulting firms for the Environmental Review process of underutilized parcels/zones to rezone them to mixed use or high- density zoning and expand the potential housing opportunities, this is possible with State SB2 grant. 1 Preston Street shall be going to City Council April 2023 for rezone from Medium Density to High Density with the potential to add 76 housing units. The other underutilized parcels/zones sites are going through the Environmental Review process and shall be going to City Council mid-summer 2023, potentially adding up to 2,513 housing units.
2)the Downtown rezone was completed in 2021. We released Public Review draft for rezone of 1 Preston in 2023. We are looking to purchase homes and hotels for housing families and PSH
3)The city released pre-approved ADU plans summer 2022, and currently working on updating the pre-approve plans with new code requirements. Pre-approved plans are available to download from the city webpage.

H.10. Rental Assistance Refer people seeking information about the Housing Choice Voucher program to
HACM.

Ongoing In 2022, the City staff referred unsheltered residents to seek information about the Housing Choice Voucher program through the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM).

H.10. Rental Assistance Collaborate with HACM to promote program to property owners to increase
participation of rental properties in the
program and expand locational choices for
voucher recipients.

Ongoing In 2022, the City's Intervention/Homeless Services Consultant collaborated with HACM, CSUMB CHE, and local developers to promote participation of the voucher program. Also, part of the City's 2017 Inclusionary Housing Ordinance allows developers to pay a rental impact fee and make 12% of the units available to the Section 8 Voucher Program.

H.10. Rental Assistance Support HACM’s petition to HUD for increased Section 8 funding as requested.

Ongoing In 2022, The City, Shangri-La, and Step Up continued collaboration with HACM in the Salinas Homekey Project (formerly know as the Good Nite Inn) This proposed project will provide 101 housing units for individuals experiencing chronic homelessness.

Sangri-La and Step Up applied and secured 85 Project Based Housing Vouchers for this project, yet, HUD is conducting through review of this project before allowing the disbursal of the 85 Project Base Housing Vouchers for the next 25 years. City and development team are awaiting a final determination from HUD.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H.10. Rental Assistance Work with stakeholders to consider adoption of a City ordinance that prohibits
housing discrimination based on a tenant’s
source of income, specifically Housing
Choice Vouchers (Section 8). Continue to
support the Housing Authority of Monterey
County’s efforts to educate landlords
about the Section 8 program.

Ongoing In 2022, the City continues to develop a more robust fair housing program with the support of a five-year Limited-Term Community Development Analyst. Their role is to serve as navigator between residents/landlords and ECHO and Watsonville Law Center. With this new collaboration, the City will be better equipped to assist HACM with any potential housing discrimination based on a tenant’s source of income.

H-11. Homebuyer
Resources
Refer information about the CalFHA
homebuyer assistance programs as
requested.

Ongoing City staff continued to refer Salinas residents with information about CalFHA programs on a case- by- case basis. The City also assists homebuyers through the Inclusionary Housing and Density Bonus Program.

H-11. Homebuyer
Resources
Promote CalFHA programs to local loan
officers to increase participation in these
programs.

Ongoing City staff continued to work with local realtors and loan officers regarding the CalHFA program.

H-11. Homebuyer
Resources
Work with the Housing Resource Center
or other agencies in annual monitoring to
ensure the homebuyer education
program(s) meet CalFHA requirements.

Ongoing City staff continued to refer homebuyers to the Housing Resource Center’s and CalHFA on-line homebuyer education programs.

H-11. Homebuyer
Resources
Continue to support first-time homebuyer
education and foreclosure prevention
services.

Ongoing The City continued to support homebuyer education and foreclosure prevention services by funding ECHO to provide First Time Home Buyer education session/training to Salinas residents and the WLC to assist Salinas residents with legal assistance on eviction and foreclosure notices related to the Covid-19 Pandemic.

The City's Limited-Term Community Development Analyst continued to promote and refer people to ECHO, Housing Resource Center, Legal Services for Seniors and California Rural Legal Assistance's programs and services to prevent evictions and foreclosures.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-12. Housing for Persons
with Disabilities
Complete the ADA Transition Plan in 2020
and annually identify funding for public
improvements through Capital
Improvement Planning.
2020 In 2022, the City applied for and secured 2 Active Transportation Program grants to fund complete streets improvements. Both projects provide funding for ADA upgrades on Williams Rd, McKinnon St and Harden Parkway.

Additionally, the City completed upgrades at the following signals:
1) The Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project began construction in 2022, which installed APS crossing at Sanborn Rd and Buckhorn Dr..
2) In 2022, the City is working on completing the upgraded accessible pedestrian signal systems at Main St./Laurel Dr., Towt St./Market St.,Towt St./Alisal St. in response to a request from the Bling and Visually Impaired Center of Monterey County.
3) In the upcoming years the City plans to install a new traffic at East Alisal St./Murphy St. and Constitution Blvd/Las Casitas Dr. The new signals will be equipped with compliant accessible pedestrian signal systems and ADA pedestrian ramps.

H-12. Housing for Persons
with Disabilities
Establish a formal reasonable
accommodation procedure by the end of
2015, whereby certain requests could be
reviewed and approved administratively
without a variance or a
public hearing.
2015 This objective is completed: The City Council adopted the Reasonable Accommodation Ordinance on August 18, 2015, adding Section 17.21 to the Municipal Code. This ordinance is still in effect.

H-12. Housing for Persons
with Disabilities
Through the annual planning process of
the CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds,
evaluate and allocate funding for
supportive services and housing for
persons with disabilities.

Ongoing The City continues to support community organizations providing services to the disabled community, particularly those that assist with securing and maintaining decent and appropriate housing. The City awarded funds to the below projects for supportive services and housing for persons with disabilities:
1) Bay Area Community Services received FY 2022-23 HUD ESG funding in the amount of $86,521 for rapid re-housing activities at the SHARE Center. 2) The City of Salinas created the Street Outreach Program, which received FY 2022- 23 HUD ESG funding in the amount of $79,000 for the street outreach team.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-13. Housing for Local
Workforce
Annually, outreach to large employers to
discuss the housing needs of their
employees and participate in a regional
partnership for agricultural employers to
contribute to farmworker housing.

Ongoing The City continues to co-sponsor the regional Farmworker Housing Oversight Committee in collaboration with the Monterey Bay Economic Partnership (MBEP). The Oversight Committee convenes quarterly with jurisdictions, industry stakeholders, community groups, and nonprofit developers from across the Salinas and Pajaro Valley Regions to advance employee-housing initiatives.

In 2022, the oversight committee prioritized the re-engagement with the Growers Association as they were not participating in the committee meetings. City and MBEP staff are currently working in re-establishing this partnership and recruitement of new members from the private sector. A new recruitment strategy is being evaluated and responsabilities are being assigned to committee members.

H-13. Housing for Local
Workforce
Assist in identifying potential funding
sources for employee housing.

Ongoing The City, M BEP, and its partners routinely track federal, state, and local sources to inform Farmworker Housing Oversight Committee (FHOC) members of funding availability. The Oversight Committee re-established the Farmworker Housing Finance Subcommittee in 2020 to identify obstacles that jurisdictions, employers, and developers face in securing funding.

The finance subcommittee convenes quarterly to explore and discuss existing finance opportunities, as well as explore and identify new funding opportunities. The City through the FHOC, will collaborate and incentive non-profit developers to pursue the funding available through the Joe Serna Jr. Farmworker Housing Grant Program.

H-13. Housing for Local
Workforce
Periodically review City codes and
regulations to promote alternative housing
types that may be appropriate for
accommodating seasonal farmworkers
and laborers, including motel conversions
to SRO housing.

Ongoing Zoning Code Amendment 2022-001 (ZCA 2022-001) went to City Council on February 15, 2022 to amend the Salinas Zoning Code to allow hotels and motels in certain zoning districts to operate as extended stay uses with occupancy up to ten (10) months in a year through a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Allowing the use of hotels and motels as extended stay units provides additional short-term housing opportunities. The City received 17 CUP applications: 5 were approved, 3 withdrawn and the remaing are in progress.

H-13. Housing for Local
Workforce
As funding permits, assist in gap-financing
of employee housing that benefits lower
income households.

Ongoing The City continues to seek partnerships with affordable housing developers focused on providing affordable housing for our agricultural workforce, especially through the Joe Serna Jr. Farmworker Housing Grant. In 2022, the City was in conversation with two developers whose projects included employee housing as part of their proposals.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-13. Housing for Local
Workforce
Review the Zoning Code to explore
potential update to standards for employee
(i.e. farmworker) housing.

Ongoing Zoning Code Amendment 2022-001 (ZCA 2022-001) went to City Council on February 15, 2022 to amend the Salinas Zoning Code to allow hotels and motels in certain zoning districts to operate as extended stay uses with occupancy up to ten (10) months in a year through a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Allowing the use of hotels and motels as extended stay units provides additional short-term housing opportunities. The City received 17 CUP applications: 5 were approved, 3 withdrawn and the remaing are in progress.

H-13. Housing for Local
Workforce
Continue to consult with affordable
housing developers to identify any
additional sites, which may be considered
appropriate for affordable housing
development.

Ongoing The City has continued to consult with affordable housing developers to identify new sites for potential new affordable housing projects. Below are relevant updates for this objective:
1) The City owns seven parcels of land along Division Street that are designated as Surplus Land.
2) The City also owns 17 parcels of land on or near Lincoln Avenue in Downtown Salinas that are designated as Surplus Land. In 2021, the City received ten responses from different entities and is in the process of negotiating the sale/transfer/ lease of these properties.
3) Through the Farmworker Housing Study and Action Plan Committee, the City finalized a map that identifies potential parcels within city limits for permanent employee housing projects.
4) The City and County updated a Memorandum of Understanding establishing a collaborative process for identifying an affordable housing developer to build a very-low and low-income multi-family rental housing project and associated amenities on County-owned property at 845 E. Laurel Drive. City staff drafted a RFQ seeking a developer that will be released early 2022.
5) Using SB2 grant funding, the City entered into a professional service agreement with a planning and environmental consultant to prepare the required zoning amendment and environmental documents to rezone 1 Preston Street from medium density residential to high density residential. The City has had conversations with a developer proposing to construct permanent supportive housing at this site.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-13. Housing for Local
Workforce
Contribute a share of funding to participate
in and conduct a special countywide study
that requires a scientific community survey
and/or a survey of agricultural employers
in the County to further define housing
needs of farm labor workforce, financing
constraints and opportunities, and best
practices by the end of 2016. Based on
the outcomes of the study, develop
appropriate programs/strategies to
address the housing needs of
farmworkers.
2016 The City and its partners finalized a Farmworker Housing Study and Action Plan for the Salinas Valley and Pajaro Valley in June of 2018. Since then, the Oversight Committee for the Farmworker Housing Action Plan continues to meet and discuss barriers to affordable and employee housing development, strategize projects that support jurisdictional capacity, and guide opportunities for regional collaboration.

In 2022, the City continued to prioritize funding and organizational capacity of the Farmworker Action Plan by partnering with the AmeriCorps VISTA Program to support the implementation of this planning effort. MBEP, the AmeriCorps Housing VISTA Volunteer, and City staff collaborate to produce quarterly summaries of each meeting and continue to develop capacity to create programs/strategies to address the housing needs of farmworkers.

H-14. Continuum of Care for
the Homeless
Continue support for inclement warming
shelter during the winter months in FY
2015-16 and subsequent years if funding
permits.

Ongoing The warmig shelter was closed when the City and County collaborated to open a permanent,regional navigation center known as the SHARE Center. Bay Area Community Services (BACS) has been operating the SHARE Center as of May 2021.This Center serves up to 100 residents experiencing homelessness. The City and County will continue to fund the operations of this facility.

As of 2022, the City continues to fund the Chinatown Navigation Center (CNC) and Sprung Shelter to house 66 residents experiencing homelessness. The City and Community Homeless Solutions assessed the needs of the facility to address any deficiencies in the building and improve the services provided to the community.

H-14. Continuum of Care for
the Homeless
Complete the renovation of 10 Soledad
into a homeless sanitation facility by 2017.
2017 The City has reconsidered the use of 10/12 Soledad Street. The building on 10/12 Soledad Street was demolished due to its hazardous conditions and materials. As of 2022, the City continues to use this site for employee and client parking for the nearby Chinatown Navigation Center.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-14. Continuum of Care for
the Homeless
Support rehabilitation of 113-115 East
Lake Street for the CSUMB Learning
Center and health center.

Ongoing The Chinatown Navigation Center has been rehabilitated since 2019, yet this facility is not operated by the CSUMB Learning Center. The facility was renovated by the City of Salinas and is under current operations by Community Homeless Solutions. The City allocated funds for the rehabiliation of 113-115 East Lake Street for the CNC Shower Trailer installation and Building Improvements. The building upgrades consist of ADA shower, three (3) standard showers, men’s and women’s restrooms, exterior building signage, and polish of existing concrete flooring improvements. The shower trailer installation will consist of a six-station portable shower trailer unit requiring an electrical upgrade and sewer connection to existing infrastructure. Projects are scheduled to begin in 2023.

H-14. Continuum of Care for
the Homeless
Through the annual planning process of
the CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds,
evaluate and allocate funding for services
and facilities for the homeless and at-risk
homeless to implement the Continuum of
Care.

Ongoing The City continues to evaluate and prioritize the allocation of funding for homeless prevention and homeless services. In 2022, the City funded street outreach, emergency shelter, homeless prevention, and rapid re-housing to unsheltered residents.

The City allocated funding for the following projects:
1) $607,980 in CDBG funds were programmed for improvements in Chinatown 2) $135,800 in CDBG funds were programmed for the Salinas Outreach and Response Team.
3) $165,521 in HUD ESG funds were programmed for street outreach, emergency shelter, homeless prevention, and rapid re-housing.
4) $261,733 in HCD ESG funds were programmed for street outreach, emergency shelter, homeless prevention, and rapid re-housing.
5) City allocated $5.6 million of ARPA funds to homeless prevention and homeless services. a) CNC operations $1 million b) Share Center Operation $1 million c) Downtown Street Teams $600 d) Salinas Homeless Motel Program $3 million

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-14. Continuum of Care for
the Homeless
Continue participation in CHSP and
expand regional collaboration, especially
Monterey County, to explore the feasibility
of Social Investment bonds and joint
development/funding of facilities and
services.

Ongoing In addition to receiving federal ESG entitlement funding, the City administered State ESG non-entitlement funding through HCD as a designated Administrative Entity for Monterey and San Benito Counties. The City continues to collaborate with CHSP and CoC in a variety of projects that facilitate housing arrangements and services. The services funded were street outreach, emergency shelter, and rapid re-housing.

In 2022, the City applied in collaboration with the Coalition of Homeless Service Providers for the Encampment Resolution Funds and was awarded $4.1 million to provide street outreach, case management, housing navigation, rapid rehousing, and interim/permanent housing options to a priority encampment on the Gabilan Creek waterway in Salinas.

H-14. Continuum of Care for
the Homeless
Continue to collaborate with CHAT to
implement a comprehensive strategy for
addressing the homeless issues in the
Chinatown area.

Ongoing The City continues to participate in community meetings such as the Salinas Downtown Community Board monthly meetings. To address the homeless issues in Chinatown, the City provides updates on upcoming homeless projects and innitiatives, and elicits collaboration with the Coalition of Homeless Service Providers, Interim Inc., California State University Monterey Bay (CSUMB), Housing Resource Center of Monterey County, and the Franciscan Workers of Junipero Serra (FWJS).

H-14. Continuum of Care for
the Homeless
Beginning in FY 2015-16, allocate funding
for Homelessness Response Program and
Outreach Coordinator to coordinate multi-
agency response to encampments and
facilitate access to services by unhoused
persons and families, and to further
support the City/County/Coalition
partnership to develop joint facilities and
co-located services.

Ongoing A Homeless Services consultant was assisting the City in developing Best Practices programs to address the homeless response needed during the pandemic. The consultant was responsible for the implementation of the CESH program. In addition, an Outreach Coordinator was hired to assist in the structure and operations of the SORT Team. The Coordinator facilitates the multi-agency response to encampments and connects services to unhoused persons and families. The SORT is responsible for engaging unsheltered individuals on a path to permanent housing and refer them to supportive services.

In 2022, The SORT team received additional funds through ERF to hire 4 full time positions and 2 peer outreach workers with lived experience.

Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
H-15. Fair Housing Provide fair housing resources information on City website, at public counters, and
through public service agencies.

Ongoing In order to create a more robust fair housing program, the City hired a five-year Limited -
Term Community Development Analyst to continue collaborating with Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity (ECHO) and other service providers. Bilingual brochures with fair housing information are available at City offices, and at the City's website.

Informational material is also distributed through public service agencies. The City has also used social media and other electronic platforms to promote fair housing resources.

H-15. Fair Housing Through the annual planning process of the CDBG funds, evaluate and allocate
funding for fair housing services as a
continued priority.

Ongoing The City continues to allocate CDBG funding to fair housing service providers by hiring a five-year Limited-Term Community Development Analyst to expand the services and resources available to tenants and landlords. The City has also advaced the process of implementing a Rental Registration program and has created a residential registration draft ordinance. It is projected that this ordinance will go to City Council for review and approval in April 2023.

H-15. Fair Housing Coordinate with Salinas community-based non-profits to ensure City outreach
materials and programs reach linguistically
isolated populations.

Ongoing Staff meets with subrecipients and other anti-poverty agencies, coordinates community meetings, attends public hearings, and connects with residents via social media and other electronic platforms to reach the City's diverse population. ADU booklets were created in english and spanish and distributed via social media and in- person.

In 2022, the City partnered with Mujeres en Accion to reach indiginous communities (Mixteco, Zapoteco, and Triqui) to access the Emergency Rental Assistance Program.

H-15. Fair Housing Continue coordination and support of local Fair Housing Service providers, school
districts and collaborative partners to
expand fair housing education of tenants
and landlords.

Ongoing In 2022, the ERAP program screened applicants for housing needs and referred them to local agencies for additional fair housing services. Referrals for services included the Housing Resource Center, Watsonville Law Center, ECHO, and CRLA. Through the Rental Registration Program, the City continues to promote and educate tenants/landlords on Fair Housing laws and best practices.

As part of 2024-32 Housing Element Cycle, the City is working to develop the AFFH to affirmatively further fair housing in connection with the City's HUD Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan.

Jurisdiction SALINAS ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
3 4
APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID +
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Units Constructed as Part of Agreement
Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7 Table E
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
1 2
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction SALINAS ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
The description should adequately document how
each unit complies with subsection (c) of Government
Code Section 65583.1
+.

For detailed reporting requirements, see the chcklist
here:

Extremely Low-
Income + Very Low-Income + Low-Income + TOTAL UNITS +
Extremely Low-
Income +
Very Low-
Income + Low-Income + TOTAL UNITS +
https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-
development/docs/adequate-sites-checklist.pdf
Rehabilitation Activity
Preservation of Units At-Risk
Acquisition of Units
Mobilehome Park Preservation
Total Units by Income
Table F
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F.

Activity Type
Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA +
Listed for Informational Purposes Only
Units that Count Towards RHNA +
Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be counted, please contact HCD to receive the password that will enable you to populate these fields.

Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c) Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction SALINAS ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Note: "+" indicates
an optional field
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Notes
2 3 6
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(2 to 4,5+)
Tenure
R=Renter
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate- Income
Deed Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non Deed
Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Total Moderate Income Units
Converted from Above
Moderate
Date Converted Notes
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Table F2
Above Moderate Income Units Converted to Moderate Income Pursuant to Government Code section 65400.2 For up to 25 percent of a jurisdiction’s moderate-income regional housing need allocation, the planning agency may include the number of units in an existing multifamily building that were converted to deed-restricted rental housing for moderate-income households by the imposition of affordability covenants and restrictions for the unit. Before adding information to this table, please ensure housing developments meet the requirements described in Government Code 65400.2(b). 5 Project Identifier Unit Types
1 4
Affordability by Household Incomes After Conversion Units credited toward Above Moderate RHNA
Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation
2 3 4
APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Realistic Capacity
Identified in the
Housing Element
Entity to whom the site
transferred Intended Use for Site
1 Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
Table G
Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of Project Identifier
NOTE: This table must only be filled out if the housing element sites inventory contains a site which is or was owned by the reporting jurisdiction, and has been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of during the reporting year.

Jurisdiction SALINAS Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2022
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
Designation Size Notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of
Units
Surplus
Designation
Parcel Size (in
acres) Notes
002163007000 30 LINCOLN AVE Vacant 0 Surplus Land 0.15 N/A 002213017000 323 CALIFORNIA ST Public Facilities 0
Exempt Surplus
Land 0.15 N/A
002213028000 342 FRONT ST Public Facilities 0 Exempt Surplus Land 0.96 N/A
002242029000 219 SALINAS ST Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.39 N/A 002244002000 215 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.12 N/A 002244098000 201 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.54 N/A 002244099000 100 HOWARD ST Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.85 N/A 002245002000 106 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.09 N/A 002245003000 108 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.09 N/A 002245004000 112 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.14 N/A 002245005000 118 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.15 N/A 002245006000 120 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.15 N/A 002245007000 122 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.15 N/A 002245008000 122 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.19 N/A 002246014000 200 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 2.43 N/A 002248011000 128 SALINAS ST Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.14 N/A 002331010000 320 LINCOLN AVE Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 3.41 N/A 002345018000 65 W ALISAL ST 101 Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.54 N/A 002345019000 320 SALINAS ST Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 1.18 N/A 003041031000 282 E ALISAL ST Commercial 0 Surplus Land 0.84 N/A 003863036000 2 MORTENSEN AVE (AIRPORT) Public Facilities 0 Exempt Surplus
Land 462.86 N/A
004091025000 923 E MARKET ST Vacant 0 Surplus Land 0.39 N/A 004091026000 115 DIVISION ST Vacant 0 Surplus Land 0.46 N/A 004091027000 123 DIVISION ST Vacant 0 Surplus Land 0.38 N/A 004091028000 137 DIVISION ST Vacant 0 Surplus Land 0.34 N/A 004091029000 145 DIVISION ST Vacant 0 Surplus Land 0.39 N/A 004091030000 151 DIVISION ST Vacant 0 Surplus Land 0.69 N/A 004091038000 C\P DIVISION ST Public Facilities 0 Surplus Land 0.04 N/A 223061002000 None Vacant 0
Exempt Surplus
Land 0.32 N/A
N/A 75 San Juan Grade Rd Other 0 Exempt Surplus
Land 0.21 N/A
N/A Division Street (N of E Market St) Other 0 Surplus Land 0.64 This is a public right of way NOTE: This table is meant to contain an invenory of
ALL surplus/excess lands the reporting jurisdiction
owns
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Parcel Identifier

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Table H
Locally Owned Surplus Sites
For Napa County jurisdictions, please format the APN's as follows:999-999-999-999 Jurisdiction SALINAS ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Note: "+" indicates an
optional field
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain
auto-calculation
formulas
Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Project Type Date Notes
2 3
APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID + Activity Date Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income Notes
Table I
Units Constructed Pursuant to Government Code 65852.21 and Applications for Lot Splits Pursuant to Government Code 66411.7 (SB9) NOTE: SB 9 PROJECTS ONLY. This table only
needs to be completed if there were lot splits
applied for pursuant to Government Code
66411.7 OR units constructed pursuant to
65852.21.

Units entitled/permitted/constructed must also
be reported in Table A2. Applications for these
units must be reported in Table A.

Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Project Identifier Unit Constructed
1 4
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction SALINAS ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Project Type Date
Units (Beds/Student
Capacity) Granted
Density Bonus
Notes
2 3 5 6
APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID +
Unit Category
(SH - Student Housing) Date Very Low- Income
Deed Restricted
Very Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Low- Income Deed
Restricted
Low- Income Non
Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income
Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Total Additional Beds
Created Due to Density
Bonus
Notes
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Table J
Student housing development for lower income students for which was granted a density bonus pursuant to subparagraph (F) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 65915 Project Identifier Units (Beds/Student Capacity) Approved 1 4
NOTE: STUDENT HOUSING WITH DENSITY BONUS ONLY. This
table only needs to be completed if there were student housing projects WITH a density bonus approved pursuant to
Government Code65915(b)(1)(F)
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
139
139
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
SFA 0 0 0
SFD 0 0 1
2 to 4 0 4 3
5+ 0 1 153
ADU 0 134 75
MH 0 0 0
Total 0 139 232
10 354
51 0
0 0
0 0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
Number of Streamlining Applications Approved
Total Developments Approved with Streamlining
Total Units Constructed with Streamlining
Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Number of Applications for Streamlining
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Jurisdiction SALINAS
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26.

Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement
Requested
Other
Funding Notes
Administration $25,000.00 $455.74 None
Existing conditions and required studies $50,000.00 $33,629.47 Other Local CIP funds and SALC
Grant also being used
Public Outreach $35,000 $54,492.98
Other Local CIP funds and SALC
Grant also being used
Element Updates $165,000.00 $28,320.33 Other Local CIP
Environmental Impact Report $70,000 $11,481.39 REAP Local CIP funds also Notices/Hearings/Adoption $5,000 $527.85 REAP
ADU pre-approved plans $120,000.00 $72,525.00 None
Initial complete, revising for
new building code
ADU videos and FAQ $15,000.00 None
Will complete after plans
approved
ADU Marketing Materials $5,000.00 None
Will complete after plans
approved
Zoning code amendment legal review $10,000
None
For use if necessary for
short-term amendments for
ADUs or similar until full
zoning update
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Table A2) Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
0 0
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
139
139

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
In Progress
Other (Please Specify in Notes)
Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section 50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
500,000.00$
Task Status
In Progress
In Progress
Other (Please Specify in Notes)
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
Other (Please Specify in Notes)
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Current Year
Deed Restricted 78
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 1
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
153
232Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
2022 HOUSING ELEMENT

← All documents from this meeting