Salinas City Council
May 16, 2023

include the construction of up to 76 residential units over roughly 129,202 square feet. Based on the existing maximum height allowable in the R-M-3.6 zone, future development would not exceed 45 feet and would be up to approximately 4-5 stories tall. Development would likely consist of buildings that are either row houses, condominiums, apartments, or other units, ranging in size from 400 square feet to 2,210 square feet, all which would be consistent with the Salinas General Plan description of the High Density Residential land use designation.

Cultural Resources Records Search
On May 20, 2021, Rincon requested a records search of the project site and a 0.5-mile radius from the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) located at Sonoma State University. On June 23, 2021, Rincon received the results of the records search for the proposed project. The purpose of the records search was to identify previously conducted cultural resources studies and previously recorded cultural resources located within the existing project site and a 0.5-mile radius. In addition to the NWIC records search, a review of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), the Office of Historic Preservation Historic Properties Directory, the California Inventory of Historic Resources, the Built Environment Resource Directory, and the Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility list was conducted.

Previously Conducted Studies
The NWIC records search identified 39 previously conducted cultural resources studies within the 0.5- mile radius of the project site (Attachment 2), of which one (S-043489) includes portions of the current project site as discussed here.

S-043489
In 2013, Lorna Billat of Earth Touch, Inc. and Dana E. Supernowicz of Historic Resource Associates conducted study S-043489 entitled Collocation (“CO”) Submission Packet FCC Form 621, Downtown Salinas, CNU3535. This study included an architectural evaluation for the project by Supernowicz entitled Architectural Evaluation Study of the Downtown Salinas Project, AT&T Mobility Site No.

CNU3535, 220 Bridge Street, Salinas, Monterey County, California 93941. The study included the development of the Area of Potential Effects (APE), a records search of the NWIC, archival research, and a pedestrian survey of the APE. Additionally, a vehicular survey was conducted for the visual APE, approximately a 0.5-mile radius around the direct APE. The study identified one historical resource, the PG&E Moss Landing-Salinas Tower No. 011/064; however, the tower was recommended ineligible for listing in the NRHP. No further cultural resources evaluations were recommended for the project. The recorded historical resource is located outside of the current project site. The study includes the entirety of the current project site within the visual APE; therefore, no formal pedestrian survey was conducted of the current project site.

Previously Recorded Resources
The NWIC records search identified 16 previously recorded cultural resources within a 0.5-mile radius of the project site (Table 1 and Attachment 2), of which none are identified within the project site. These resources include a historic district, four historic-period structures, six historic-period buildings, and one historic-period archaeological site.

City of Salinas
Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1 Preston Street Project

Table 1 Previously Recorded Resources within 0.5-mile Radius of the Project Site Primary
Number Trinomial
Resource
Type Description
Recorder(s)
and Year(s)
NRHP/
CRHR Status
Relationship
to Project Site
P-27-
002322
CA-MNT2050H Historic
Structure
El Camino Real,
Highway 101
1999 (J. Berg and S.

Mikesell);
2002 (T. Rogers)
Portions
recommended
ineligible for listing in
NRHP
Outside
P-27-
002691
– Historic
Building
26 Central
Avenue
2003 (R. Cartier) Not evaluated Outside
P-27-
002764
CA-MNT2198H Historic
Site
Refuse deposit 2003 (D. McIntosh) Not evaluated Outside P-27-
002870
– Historic
Building
Associated Seed
Growers
Building,
Everett B. Clark
Seed Company
1996 (Caltrans) Appears eligible for
listing in the NRHP
Outside
P-27-
002871
– Historic
Building
El Aguila
Mexican
Bakery; Golden
Meat Market
1996 (Caltrans) Appears ineligible for
listing in the NRHP
Outside
P-27-
002872
– Historic
Building
Salinas Used
Furniture Store
1996 (Caltrans) Appears ineligible for
listing in the NRHP
Outside
P-27-
002873
– Historic
Building
C. E. Bugbee
Blacksmith
Shop
1996 (Caltrans) Appears ineligible for
listing in the NRHP
Outside
P-27-
002874
– Historic
Building
Waldorf Hotel;
Mrs. Katherine
Leifgen
Furnished
Rooms
1996 (Caltrans) Appears ineligible for
listing in the NRHP
Outside
P-27-
002908
– Historic
Building
Pasquale Maida
Grocery Store
1996 (Caltrans) Appears ineligible for
listing in the NRHP
Outside
P-27-
003036
– Historic
District
Salinas
Southern Pacific
Railroad
Historic District
2011 (M. Hibma) Recommended eligible
for listing in the NRHP
Outside
P-27-
003037
– Historic
Building,
District
Element
Southern Pacific
Freight Depot
1996 (K. Seavey);
2006 (A. Pulcheon);
2010 (M. Hibma)
Recommended eligible
for listing in the NRHP
as a district
contributor
Outside
P-27-
003038
– Historic
Building,
District
Element
Southern Pacific
Passenger
Station
1998 (K. Seavey);
2006 (A. Pulcheon);
2010 (M. Hibma)
Recommended eligible
for listing in the NRHP
as a district
contributor
Outside
City of Salinas
Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1 Preston Street Project

Primary
Number Trinomial
Resource
Type Description
Recorder(s)
and Year(s)
NRHP/
CRHR Status
Relationship
to Project Site
P-27-
003039
– Historic
Building,
District
Element
Railway Express
Building
1998 (K. Seavey);
2006 (A. Pulcheon);
2010 (M. Hibma)
Recommended eligible
for listing in the NRHP
as a district
contributor
Outside
P-27-
003234
– Historic
Structure
PG&E Moss
Landing –
Salinas
Electrical Tower
No. 011/064
2013 (D. E.

Supernowicz)
Recommended
ineligible for listing in
the NRHP
Outside
P-27-
003465
– Historic
District
Chinese
American
Community
1980 (N. Way) 7: Not Evaluated, or
Needs Re-evaluation
for NRHP or CRHR
Outside
P-27-
003658
CA-MNT2467H Historic
Site
Haciendas 2017 (J. Schlagheck
and F. Steffen)
Recommended eligible
for listing in the CRHR
Outside
Source: NWIC 2021
Aerial Imagery and Historical Topographic Maps Review
Rincon completed a review of historical topographic maps and aerial imagery to ascertain the development history of the project site. Historical topographic maps from 1910 to 1964 depict the project site as undeveloped surrounded by a channelized creek to the west, south, and north (USGS 2021; NETR Online 2021). Historical topographic maps from 1970 to 1984 depict a structure added within the southeastern portion of the project site (NETR Online 2021). Aerial imagery from 1956 to 2005 depicts the project site as graded with a structure identified in the topographic maps, with housing development growing to the east and the water source as depicted on the topographic maps (NETR Online 2021). By 2009, the aerial imagery shows that the structure is no longer present, and vegetation has developed throughout the project site. Aerial imagery from 2012 depicts the project site in its current state, as graded with residential housing to the east and a channelized canal to the west, south, and north.

The site has been disturbed by the previous development and demolition of a structure from 1970 to 2009. Additionally, the project site was previously used as a staging area, and the City stated that the owner grants access to the project site which as lead to further disturbance of the site (City of Salinas 2021).

Sacred Lands File Search
Rincon contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on May 17, 2021, to request a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search of the project site. The NAHC emailed a response to the City on June 1, 2021, stating the SLF search was positive. In their response, the NAHC provided a list of 11 tribes who may have knowledge of cultural resources within the project site. The SLF search can be found in Attachment 3 of this report. Rincon was not contracted to conduct Native American outreach as a part of this cultural assessment.

City of Salinas
Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1 Preston Street Project

Pedestrian Field Survey
On August 20, 2021, Rincon Archaeologist Dustin Merrick, MA, Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA), conducted a pedestrian survey of the project site. Mr. Merrick walked a series of pedestrian transects oriented generally north-south and east-west, spaced no more than 15 meters apart across the project site. Areas of exposed ground were inspected for prehistoric artifacts (e.g., flaked stone tools, tool-making debris, stone milling tools, ceramics, fire-affected rock), ecofacts (marine shell and bone), soil discoloration that might indicate the presence of a cultural midden, soil depressions, and features that indicate the former presence of structures or buildings (e.g., standing exterior walls, postholes, foundations) or historic debris (e.g., metal, glass, ceramics). Ground disturbances, such as burrows, and drainages were also visually inspected. Ground visibility within the project site ranged from poor along the perimeter (less than five percent) to excellent (greater than 95 percent) within the center.

The project site consisted of tan to dark brown sand and showed evidence of heavy disturbance. Native soils were intermixed with imported fill with some gravel. Figure 3 through Figure 6 in Attachment 1 depict the current conditions of the project site.

No new cultural resources were observed or recorded during the field survey.

Findings and Recommendations
The background research and pedestrian field survey did not identify any cultural resources within the project site. No built environment resources are present that may be impacted by the project; therefore Rincon recommends a finding of no impact to historical resources.

Although the SLF search was returned with positive results, no prehistoric resources were identified within the project site. Given the negative results of this study, the project site is considered to have low archaeological sensitivity. However, it is possible that unanticipated archaeological deposits and/or human remains could be encountered and damaged during the ground-disturbing activities associated with construction (such as grading and excavation), especially if those activities occur in less-disturbed buried sediments. Consequently, mitigation is necessary to ensure that potential impacts to archaeological resources, including those that may be considered historical resources, are reduced to a less-than-significant level.

Given the results of this assessment, Rincon recommends a finding of less than significant impact to archaeological resources with mitigation for the purposes of CEQA. The following is recommended in the unlikely case of unanticipated discoveries during ground-disturbing activities. Also included below is a summary of existing regulations regarding the discovery of human remains. With adherence to existing regulations, Rincon recommends a finding of less than significant impact to human remains.

Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources
In the unlikely event that archaeological resources are unexpectedly encountered during grounddisturbing activities, work in the immediate area should be halted and an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archeology (National Park Service 1983) will be contacted immediately to evaluate the find. If the find is prehistoric, then a Native American representative will be contacted to participate in the evaluation of the find. If necessary, the City of Salinas
Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1 Preston Street Project

evaluation may require preparation of a treatment plan and archaeological testing for California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) eligibility. If the discovery proves to be eligible for listing in the CRHR and cannot be avoided additional work, such as testing and data recovery excavations, may be warranted to mitigate any significant impacts to cultural resources to less than a significant level.

Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains
In the unlikely event of an unanticipated discovery of human remains, all ground-disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery will be immediately suspended and redirected elsewhere. All steps required to comply with State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 will be implemented including contacting the Monterey County Department of Medical Examiner-Coroner. If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the coroner will notify the NAHC, which will determine and notify a most likely descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete an inspection of the site and provide recommendations for treatment to the landowner within 48 hours of being granted access.

Please do not hesitate to contact Rincon with any questions regarding this cultural resources assessment.

Sincerely,
Rincon Consultants, Inc.

Courtney Montgomery, MA Hannah Haas, MA, RPA
Archaeologist Cultural Resources Program Manager/
Senior Archaeologist
Andrew Pulcheon, MA, RPA, AICP, CEP
Principal/ Senior Archaeologist
Attachments
Attachment 1 Figures
Attachment 2 NWIC Records Search Results
Attachment 3 Sacred Lands File Search
City of Salinas
Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1 Preston Street Project

References
Billat, Lorna, and Dana E. Supernowicz
2013 Collocation Submission Packet, Downtown Salinas, CNU3535. Report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University.

National Park Service
1983 Archeological and Historic Preservation: Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Electronic document, online at http://www.nps.gov/history/local-lawArch_Standards.htm Accessed December 6, 2011.

NETR Online
2021 Historic Aerials. https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer Accessed July 2021.

Resendiz, Oscar
2021 City of Salinas (Mr. Oscar Resendiz, Associate Planner) email exchange with Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Ms. Katherine Green, AICP, Project Manager) regarding imported soils and site conditions.

United States Geological Survey (USGS)
2021 Topo View. [online map database]. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/ Accessed July 2021.

Attachment 1
Figures
City of Salinas
Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1 Preston Street Project 1-1
Figure 1 Project Boundary Map
City of Salinas
Cultural Resources Assessment for the1 Preston Street Project 1-2
Figure 2 Project Location Map
City of Salinas
Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1 Preston Street Project 1-3
Figure 3 Overview of Ground Visibility within Perimeter, Plainview Figure 4 Overview of the Northern Portion of the Project Site, Facing North City of Salinas
Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1 Preston Street Project 1-4
Figure 5 Overview of Project Site, Facing Northeast
Figure 6 Intermixed Soils and Gravel, Facing South
Attachment 2
NWIC Records Search Results
California Historical Resources Information System
CHRIS Data Request Form
1 of 3
2-29-2020 Version
ACCESS AND USE AGREEMENT NO.:_______________ IC FILE NO.:________________________ To: ___________________________________________________________________ Information Center Print Name: ____________________________________________________ Date: _____________________ Affiliation: ________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________________________________ City: _________________________________________ State: ________________ Zip: __________________ Phone: __________________ Fax: __________________ Email: ____________________________________ Billing Address (if different than above): _________________________________________________________ Billing Email: _______________________________________________ Billing Phone: ___________________ Project Name / Reference: ___________________________________________________________________ Project Street Address: ______________________________________________________________________ County or Counties: ________________________________________________________________________ Township/Range/UTMs: _____________________________________________________________________ USGS 7.5’ Quad(s): ________________________________________________________________________ PRIORITY RESPONSE (Additional Fee): yes / no
TOTAL FEE NOT TO EXCEED: $___________________________
(If blank, the Information Center will contact you if the fee is expected to exceed $1,000.00) Special Instructions:

Information Center Use Only
Date of CHRIS Data Provided for this Request: ___________________________________________________ Confidential Data Included in Response: yes / no
Notes: ___________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 of 3
2-29-2020 Version
California Historical Resources Information System
CHRIS Data Request Form
Mark the request form as needed. Attach a PDF of your project area (with the radius if applicable) mapped on a

7.5’ USGS topographic quadrangle to scale 1:24000 ratio 1:1 neither enlarged nor reduced and include a shapefile of your project area, if available. Shapefiles are the current CHRIS standard for submitting digital spatial data for your project area or radius. Check with the appropriate IC for current availability of digital data products.
• Documents will be provided in PDF format. Paper copies will only be provided if PDFs are not available at the time of the request or under specially arranged circumstances. • Location information will be provided as a digital map product (Custom Maps or GIS data) unless the area has not yet been digitized. In such circumstances, the IC may provide hand drawn maps. • In addition to the $150/hr. staff time fee, client will be charged the Custom Map fee when GIS is required to complete the request [e.g., a map printout or map image/PDF is requested and no GIS Data is requested, or an electronic product is requested (derived from GIS data) but no mapping is requested].

For product fees, see the CHRIS IC Fee Structure on the OHP website.

1. Map Format Choice:

Select One: Custom GIS Maps  GIS Data  Custom GIS Maps and GIS Data  No Maps  Any selection below left unmarked will be considered a "no. " Within project area Within ______ radius
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no
Within ______
radius
Location Information:

ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Locations1
NON-ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Locations
Report Locations1
“Other” Report Locations2

3. Database Information:
(contact the IC for product examples, or visit the SSJVIC website for examples) Within project area
ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Database1
List (PDF format) yes / no yes / no
Detail (PDF format)
Excel Spreadsheet
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
NON-ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Database
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
List (PDF format)
Detail (PDF format)
Excel Spreadsheet yes / no yes / no
Report Database1
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
List (PDF format)
Detail (PDF format)
Excel Spreadsheet
Include “Other” Reports 2
yes / no yes / no

4. Document PDFs (paper copy only upon request):

Within project area Within ______
radius
ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Records1
NON-ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Records
Reports1
“Other” Reports2
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
California Historical Resources Information System
CHRIS Data Request Form

5. Eligibility Listings and Documentation:

Within project area Within ______
radius
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
OHP Built Environment Resources Directory3:

Directory listing only (Excel format)
Associated documentation4
OHP Archaeological Resources Directory1,5:

Directory listing only (Excel format)
Associated documentation4
California Inventory of Historic Resources (1976):

Directory listing only (PDF format)
Associated documentation4

6. Additional Information:

The following sources of information may be available through the Information Center. However, several of these sources are now available on the OHP website and can be accessed directly. The Office of Historic Preservation makes no guarantees about the availability, completeness, or accuracy of the information provided through these sources. Indicate below if the Information Center should review and provide documentation (if available) of any of the following sources as part of this request.

Caltrans Bridge Survey yes
/ no
/ no
yes
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
Ethnographic Information
Historical Literature
Historical Maps
Local Inventories
GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps
Shipwreck Inventory
Soil Survey Maps
1 In order to receive archaeological information, requestor must meet qualifications as specified in Section III of the current version of the California Historical Resources Information System Information Center Rules of Operation Manual and be identified as an Authorized User or Conditional User under an active CHRIS Access and Use Agreement. 2 “Other” Reports GIS layer consists of report study areas for which the report content is almost entirely non-fieldwork related (e.g., local/regional history, or overview) and/or for which the presentation of the study area boundary may or may not add value to a record search.
3 Provided as Excel spreadsheets with no cost for the rows; the only cost for this component is IC staff time. Includes, but not limited to, information regarding National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, California State Historical Landmarks, California State Points of Historical Interest, and historic building surveys. Previously known as the HRI and then as the HPD, it is now known as the Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD). The Office of Historic Preservation compiles this documentation and it is the source of the official status codes for evaluated resources. 4 Associated documentation will vary by resource. Contact the IC for further details. 5 Provided as Excel spreadsheets with no cost for the rows; the only cost for this component is IC staff time. Previously known as the Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, now it is known as the Archaeological Resources Directory (ARD).

The Office of Historic Preservation compiles this documentation and it is the source of the official status codes for evaluated resources.
3 of 3
2-29-2020 Version
6/23/2021 NWIC File No.: 20-2378
Dustin Merrick
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
180 N. Ashwood Avenue
Ventura, CA 93003
Re: 1 Preston Street Project (21-10851) The Northwest Information Center received your record search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Salinas USGS 7.5’ quad(s). The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and a ½ mile radius:

Resources within project area: None
Resources within ½ mile radius: P-27-002322; P-27-002691; P-27-002764; P-27-002870; P-27-002871; P-27-002872; P-27-002873; P-27-002874;
P-27-002908; P-27-003036; P-27-003037; P-27-003038;
P-27-003039; P-27-003234; P-27-003465; P-27-003658
Reports within project area: S-43489
Reports within ½ mile radius: S-3302; S-5604; S-7584; S-10634; S-12623; S-13355; S18837; S-19623; S-19979; S-20593; S-22657; S-26911; S26922; S-27108; S-28373; S-33061; S-33258; S-35311; S37850; S-40755; S-46390; S-47415; S-47776; S-50212 Resource Database Printout (list): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Database Printout (details): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Digital Database Records: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (list): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (details): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Digital Database Records: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Record Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed OHP Built Environment Resources Directory: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Caltrans Bridge Survey: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Ethnographic Information: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Historical Literature: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Historical Maps: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Local Inventories: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Shipwreck Inventory: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution.

If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above.

The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. Requests made after initial invoicing will result in the preparation of a separate invoice.

Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS).

Sincerely, Justin Murazzo
Researcher
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources 20-2378 :: 1 Preston Street Project (21-10851)
S-003302 1976 Archaeological Impact Evaluation of
proposed site of Municipal Tennis Courts,
Sherwood Park (letter report)
Archaeological Resource
Service
Voided - E-2 MNT Katherine Flynn
S-005604 1980 Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Laurel West Encore Subdivision, North
Salinas, Monterey County, California.

Paul Hampson, Trudy Archaeological Consulting
Haversat, and Gary S.

Breschini
Other - E-533 MNT
S-007584 1985 Preliminary Cultural Resources
Reconnaissance for the Rico/Lake Street
Bridge Project, Salinas, Monterey County,
California.

R. Paul Hampson and Archaeological Consulting
Gary S. Breschini
Submitter - Project
753
S-010634 1988 Preliminary Cultural Resources
Reconnaissance of a Parcel at West Menke
and Martella Streets, Salinas, Monterey
County, California
Agency Nbr - HUD # Gary S. Breschini Archaeological Consulting 121-EH-272-NP-CMIL8;
Submitter - AC
Project 1369
S-012623 1991 Preliminary Cultural Resources
Reconnaissance for Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 003-161-06 and -26, Salinas,
Monterey County, California
Anna Runnings and Gary Archaeological Consulting
S. Breschini
Submitter - Project
1863
S-013355 1991 Preliminary Archaeological Investigation of the Salinas Redevelopment Area, 100
Block/Alisal Slough, with Research Design
and Proposal for Evaluation for Eligibility
Archaeological Resource
Management
Voided - S-13354 Glory Anne Laffey
S-013355a 1991 Archaeological Testing of the Salinas
Redevelopment Area 100 Block/Alisal Slough
Archaeological Resource
Management
Laurie Crane and Cynthia
James
S-018837 1996 Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance for the Proposed Salinas Intermodal
Transportation Center, Salinas, Monterey
County, California
Anna Runnings and Archaeological Consulting
Trudy Haversat
Submitter - AC
Project 2454
S-019623 1997 Report on burial identification and recovery and subsequent archaeological monitoring
conducted at the National Steinbeck Center
Project in Salinas, Monterey County,
California (letter report)
Gary S. Breschini Archaeological Consulting
S-019979 1997 Combined Archaeological Reconnaissance
and Monitoring for Storm Drain Improvements
in Salinas, Monterey County, California
Kathy Owens, Anna Archaeological Consulting
Runnings, and Trudy
Haversat
Submitter - AC
Project 2517
S-020593 1998 Cultural Resources Assessment, Pacific Bell Mobile Services Facility SF-830-05, Salinas,
Monterey County, California (letter report)
Barry A. Price Applied EarthWorks

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources 20-2378 :: 1 Preston Street Project (21-10851)
S-022657 2000 Phase 1 Archaeological Survey Along
Onshore Portions of the Global West Fiber
Optic Cable Project
Science Applications
International Corporation
Izaak Sawyer, Laurie
Pfeiffer, Karen
Rasmussen, and Judy
Berryman
27-000334, 27-000335, 27-000349,
27-000706, 27-000806, 27-000888,
27-001207, 27-001227, 27-001228,
27-001393, 27-001408, 27-001482,
41-000410, 43-000449, 44-000047,
44-000155, 44-000156, 44-000157,
44-000174, 44-000270
S-026911 2003 Cultural Resource Assessment for the Main Street Cineplex and Parking Structure in
Downtown Salinas, California
Randy M. Baloain Applied EarthWorks
S-026922 2003 Negative Archaeological Survey Report,
Proposed Parking Lot at Main and Market
Streets near Downtown Salinas for the
Salinas Intermodal Transportation Center
Randy M. Baloian Applied EarthWorks, Inc.

S-027108 2003 The Salinas Hotel and Greyhound
Office/Retail Development Projects: An
Historical, Architectural, and Archaeological
Evaluation
Archaeological Resource
Management
27-002686, 27-002687, 27-002688,
27-002689, 27-002690, 27-002691,
27-002692, 27-002693, 27-002694,
27-002695
S-028373 2004 Cultural Resources Monitoring for the
Intermodal Transportation Center Parking Lot
in Downtown Salinas, Monterey County,
California
Agency Nbr - City Randy Baloian Applied EarthWorks, Inc. 27-002764 project #9060
S-033061 2006 Cultural Resources Final Report of Monitoring and Findings for the Qwest Network
Construction Project, State of California
SWCA Environmental
Consultants
Nancy Sikes, Cindy
Arrington, Bryon Bass,
Chris Corey, Kevin Hunt,
Steve O'Neil, Catherine
Pruett, Tony Sawyer,
Michael Tuma, Leslie
Wagner, and Alex
Wesson
01-000027, 01-000040, 01-000087,
01-000088, 01-000089, 01-000090,
07-000138, 27-000802, 27-001191,
27-001207, 28-000467, 43-000106,
43-000141, 43-000449, 43-000573,
43-000575, 43-000754, 43-000928,
43-001071, 48-000208, 48-000211,
48-000214, 48-000441, 48-000549,
49-001583, 57-000194, 57-000198,
57-000297, 57-000301, 57-000307
Submitter - SWCA
Cultural Resources
Report Database No.
06-507;
Submitter - SWCA
Report No. 10715-
S-033061a 2006 Cultural Resources Final Report of Monitoring and Findings for the Qwest Network
Construction Project, State of California
SWCA Environmental
Consultants
S-033061b 2007 Final Report of Monitoring and Findings for the Qwest Network Construction Project
(letter report)
SWCA Environmental
Consultants
Nancy E. Sikes

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources 20-2378 :: 1 Preston Street Project (21-10851)
S-033258 2006 Supplemental Historic Property Survey
Report for the Salinas Intermodal
Transportation Center Project, Salinas,
Monterey County, California
Andrew Pulcheon LSA Associates, Inc. 27-002908, 27-002923, 27-003037, 27-003038, 27-003039
S-033258a 2006 Archaeological Survey Report for the Salinas Intermodal Transportation Center Project,
Salinas, Monterey County, California
Andrew Pulcheon LSA
S-033258b 2006 Historical Resources Evaluation Report for the Salinas Intermodal Transportation Center
Project, Salinas, Monterey County, California
Andrew Pulcheon LSA
S-035311 2008 Letter Report on Monitoring Findings for the Salinas Municipal Aquatic Center
Gary S. Breschini Archaeological Consulting
S-037850 2011 Historic Property Survey Report for the
Salinas Freight Depot Project, Salinas,
Monterey County, California, Caltrans District
5 Michael Hibma LSA Associates, Inc 27-003036, 27-003037, 27-003038, 27-003039
Caltrans - EA-05-
xxxxxx
S-037850a 2011 Archaeological Survey Report for the Salinas Freight Depot Project, Salinas, Monterey
County, California, Caltrans District 5
Neal Kaptain LSA Associates, Inc.

S-037850b 2011 Historical Resources Evaluation Report for the Salinas Freight Depot Project, Salinas,
Monterey County, California
Michael Hibma LSA Associates, Inc.

S-037850c 2010 Draft Historic Structure Report for the
Southern Pacific Freight Depot, Salinas,
California
Kent L. Seavey
S-040755 2013 Final Archaeological Monitoring Report,
Taylor Farms Corporate Office, 138 Main
Street, Salinas, Monterey County (letter
report)
Submitter - AC Gary S. Breschini Archaeological Consulting Project 4695
S-043489 2013 Collocation Submission Packet, Downtown
Salinas, CNU3535
Lorna Billat and Dana E. EarthTouch, Inc.

Supernowicz
Agency Nbr - 27-003234
CNU3535
S-043489a 2013 Architectural Evaluation Study of the
Downtown Salinas Project, AT&T Mobility
Site No. CNU3535, 220 Bridge Street,
Salinas, Monterey County, California 93941
Historic Resource
Associates
Dana E. Supernowicz
S-046390 2015 Archaeological Records Search and Site
Reconnaissance, Haciendas Phase III and IV
Housing Project, City of Salinas, Monterey
County, California
Holman & Associates
Archaeological Consulting
John Schlagheck 27-003658

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources 20-2378 :: 1 Preston Street Project (21-10851)
S-046390a 2018 Final Archaeological Monitoring and Data Recovery Report, Haciendas III Housing
Project, City of Salinas, Monterey County,
California
John P. Schlagheck and Holman and Associates
Fallin Steffen
S-047415 2015 Phase 1 Archaeological Survey of APN 002- 191-018, 019, 020, 021, 023, 024, 028 & 029,
Salinas, Monterey County, California
Mary Doane and Gary S. Archaeological Consulting
Breschini
OHP PRN - HUD 27-003465
2015_0306_004;
Submitter - Project
5040;
Voided - S-46500
S-047415a 2015 HUD 2015_0306_004; Housing Development
Project Located at 71 Soledad Street, Salinas
Office of Historic
Preservation
Carol Roland-Nawi
S-047776 2015 Cultural Resources Review of the Former
Salinas Manufactured Gas Plant Site Project,
Salinas, Monterey County, California (letter
report)
Far Western
Anthropological Research
Group
Allika Ruby
S-050212 2016 Section 106 Review-Compliance with
36CFR800.4, Old Municipal Swimming Pool
Building, Phase I Retrofit, 920 N. Main Street,
Salinas CA 93906 (letter report)
OTIS Report Anna M. Velaquez City of Salinas
Number -
HUD_2014_1017_00
1;
OTIS Report
Number -
HUD_2016_0725_00
4 S-050212a 2014 HUD_2014_1017_001, Rehabilitation Project Located at 920 North Main Street, Salinas
Office of Historic
Preservation
Carol Roland-Nawi
S-050212b 2016 Section 106 Review, Old Municipal Swimming Pool Building, Phase II Retrofit, 920 N. Main
Street, Salinas, CA 93906 (letter report)
Anastacia Wyatt City of Salinas
S-050212c 2016 HUD_2016_0725_004; Municipal Pool
Retrofit, Phase II of 920 North Main Street,
Salinas
Office of Historic
Preservation
Julianne Polanco

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
20-2378 :: 1 Preston Street Project (21-10851)
P-27-002322 CA-MNT-002050H Resource Name - El Camino Real (Highway 101);
Other - ECR1 and ECR2;
Other - Highway 101;
Other - MM-101;
OHP Property Number - 173439;
OHP PRN - Proj.Rev.

FHWA070906A (segment vic.

Aromas)
S-005507, S022819, S-026137,
S-027827, S030334, S-030335,
S-033131, S035825, S-038177,
S-038553
Structure Historic AH07; HP37 1999 (John Berg, Steve Mikesell, Far Western & JRP Historical
Consulting Serives);
2002 (Theresa Rogers, JRP
Historical Consulting Services)
P-27-002691 Resource Name - 26 Central
Avenue
Building Historic HP06 2003 (Robert Cartier, Archaeological S-027108 Resource Management)
P-27-002764 CA-MNT-002198H Resource Name - ITC-1 Site Historic AH04 2003 (Douglas McIntosh, Applied S-028373 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-27-002870 Other - Map Reference No. 4;
Other - Associated Seed Growers
Building;
Resource Name - Everett B. Clark
Seed Company
Building Historic HP08 1996 ([none], Caltrans)
P-27-002871 Other - Map Reference No. 6;
Resource Name - El Aguila
Mexican Bakery;
Other - Golden Meat Market
Building Historic HP06 1996 ([none], Caltrans District 5) P-27-002872 Other - Map Reference No. 7;
Resource Name - Salinas Used
Furniture Store
Building Historic HP06 1996 ([none], Caltrans District 5) P-27-002873 Other - Map Reference No. 8;
Resource Name - C.E. Bugbee
Blacksmith Shop
Building Historic HP06 1996 ([none], Caltrans District 5) P-27-002874 Other - Map Reference No. 5;
Resource Name - Waldorf Hotel;
Other - Mrs. Kathrine Leifgen
Furnished Rooms (1926)
Building Historic HP05 1996 ([none], Caltrans District 5) P-27-002908 Other - Map Reference No. 9;
Resource Name - Pasquale
Maida Grocery Store
Building Historic HP06 1996 ([none], Caltrans District 5) S-033258

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
20-2378 :: 1 Preston Street Project (21-10851)
P-27-003036 Resource Name - Salinas
Southern Pacific Railroad Historic
District;
Other - Salinas Amtrak Station;
OTIS Resource Number -
510364;
OHP Property Number - 187923;
OHP PRN - FHWA110311A;
OHP PRN - FTA120110A
District Historic HP06; HP17; HP30 2011 (Michael Hibma, LSA S-037850 Associates, Inc.)
P-27-003037 Resource Name - Southern
Pacific Freight Depot;
Other - Freight Depot;
Caltrans - Map Reference No. 3;
OTIS Resource Number -
510366;
OHP Property Number - 187925;
OHP PRN - FHWA110311A;
OHP PRN - FTA120110A
Building, S-033258, S-037850
Element of
district
Historic HP17 1996 (Kent Seavey, Caltrans District
5);
2006 (Andrew Pulcheon, LSA
Associates, Inc.);
2010 (Michael Hibma, LSA
Associates, Inc.)
P-27-003038 Resource Name - Southern
Pacific Passenger Station;
Other - Station;
Other - Southern Pacific Railroad
Station;
Other - Amtrak Station;
Caltrans - Map Reference No. 1;
OTIS Resource Number -
510365;
OHP Property Number - 187924;
OHP PRN - FHWA110311A;
OHP PRN - FTA120110A
Building, S-033258, S-037850
Element of
district, Other
Historic HP17 1998 (Kent Seavey, Caltrans District
5);
2006 (Andrew Pulcheon, LSA
Associates, Inc.);
2010 (Michael Hibma, LSA
Associates, Inc.)
P-27-003039 Resource Name - Railway
Express Building;
Other - REA Building;
Other - Railway Express Agency
Building;
Other - American Railway
Express Agency Building;
Other - Map Reference No. 2;
OTIS Resource Number -
510367;
OHP Property Number - 187926;
OHP PRN - FHWA110311A;
OHP PRN - FTA120110A
Building, S-033258, S-037850
Element of
district
Historic HP06 1998 (Kent Seavey, Caltrans District
5);
2006 (Andrew Pulcheon, LSA
Associates, Inc.);
2010 (Michael Hibma, LSA
Associates, Inc.)

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
20-2378 :: 1 Preston Street Project (21-10851)
P-27-003234 Resource Name - PG&E Moss
Landing-Salinas Electrical Tower
No. 011/064;
Other - Tower No. 011/064
Structure Historic HP09; HP11 2013 (Dana E. Supernowicz, S-043489, S-050347 Historic Resource Associates)
P-27-003465 Resource Name - Chinese
American Community;
OHP PRN - 3902-0002-9999
District Historic HP02; HP05; HP06; S-047415
HP16
1980 (Nancy Way, Chinese
American Survey)
P-27-003658 CA-MNT-002467H Resource Name - Haciendas
Phase III-Archaeological
Sensitive Area-Feature 1
(HIIIASA-Feature 1)
Site Historic AH04 2017 (John Schlagheck, Fallin S-046390 Steffen, Holman & Associates)

Attachment 3
Sacred Lands File Search
Local Government Tribal Consultation List Request
Native American Heritage Commission
1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100
West Sacramento, CA 95691
916-373-3710
916-373-5471 – Fax
[email protected]
Type of List Requested
X CEQA Tribal Consultation List (AB 52) – Per Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1, subs. (b), (d), (e) and 21080.3.2
X General Plan (SB 18) - Per Government Code § 65352.3.

Local Action Type:
___ General Plan ___ General Plan Element _x_ General Plan Amendment ___ Specific Plan ___ Specific Plan Amendment ___ Pre-planning Outreach Activity Required Information
Project Title: 1 Preston Street Project
Local Government/Lead Agency: City of Salinas
Contact Person: Lisa Brinton, Planning Manager Community Development Department Street Address: 65 W. Alisal Street, 2nd Floor
City: Salinas Zip: 93901
Phone: 831-775-4259
Email: [email protected]
Specific Area Subject to Proposed Action
The proposed project consists of a General Plan Amendment to rezone the existing vacant 2.6-acre lot at 1 Preston Street from Residential Medium Density to Residential High Density. The project will be development in two phases. Phase one includes the development of 27 homes with the current zoning. Phase two will seek a Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of 2-12- bedroom transitional housing units
Additional Request
 Sacred Lands File Search - Required Information:

USGS Quadrangle Name(s):_Salinas_____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Township:_14S_______________ Range:_03E_______________ Section(s):_29________________ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

June 1, 2021
Lisa Brinton, Planner Manager
City of Salinas
Via Email to: [email protected]
Re: Native American Consultation, Pursuant to Senate Bill 18 (SB18), Government Codes §65352.3 and §65352.4, as well as Assembly Bill 52 (AB52), Public Resources Codes §21080.1, §21080.3.1 and §21080.3.2, 1 Preston Street Project, Monterey County Dear Ms. Brinton:

Attached is a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within the boundaries of the above referenced counties or projects.

Government Codes §65352.3 and §65352.4 require local governments to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of avoiding, protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to cultural places when creating or amending General Plans, Specific Plans and Community Plans.

Public Resources Codes §21080.3.1 and §21080.3.2 requires public agencies to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of avoiding, protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to tribal cultural resources as defined, for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) projects.

The law does not preclude local governments and agencies from initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction. The NAHC believes that this is the best practice to ensure that tribes are consulted commensurate with the intent of the law.

Best practice for the AB52 process and in accordance with Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(d), is to do the following:

Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section.

The NAHC also recommends, but does not require that lead agencies include in their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential affect (APE), such as:

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

SECRETARY
Merri Lopez-Keifer
Luiseño

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Julie TumamaitStenslie
Chumash

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to:
• A listing of any and all known cultural resources have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites;
• Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; • Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and
• If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.

2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including:
• Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures.

All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code Section 6254.10.

3. The result of the Sacred Lands File (SFL) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission was positive. Please contact the tribes on the attached list for more information.

4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the potential APE; and

5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the potential APE.

Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS is not exhaustive, and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource.

This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event, that they do, having the information beforehand well help to facilitate the consultation process.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance we can assure that our consultation list remains current.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address:

[email protected].

Sincerely,
Sarah Fonseca
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment
Amah MutsunTribal Band
Valentin Lopez, Chairperson
P.O. Box 5272
Galt, CA, 95632
Phone: (916) 743 - 5833
[email protected]
Costanoan
Northern Valley
Yokut
Amah MutsunTribal Band of
Mission San Juan Bautista
Irene Zwierlein, Chairperson
789 Canada Road
Woodside, CA, 94062
Phone: (650) 851 - 7489
Fax: (650) 332-1526
[email protected]
Costanoan
Costanoan Rumsen Carmel
Tribe
Tony Cerda, Chairperson
244 E. 1st Street
Pomona, CA, 91766
Phone: (909) 629 - 6081
Fax: (909) 524-8041
[email protected]
Costanoan
Esselen Tribe of Monterey
County
Tom Little Bear Nason, Chairman
P. O. Box 95
Carmel Valley, CA, 93924
Phone: (831) 659 - 2153
Fax: (831) 659-0111
[email protected]
g
Costanoan
Esselen
Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of
Costanoan
Ann Marie Sayers, Chairperson
P.O. Box 28
Hollister, CA, 95024
Phone: (831) 637 - 4238
[email protected]
Costanoan
Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of
Costanoan
Kanyon Sayers-Roods, MLD
Contact
1615 Pearson Court
San Jose, CA, 95122
Phone: (408) 673 - 0626
[email protected]
Costanoan
Ohlone/Costanoan-Esselen
Nation
Louise Miranda-Ramirez,
Chairperson
P.O. Box 1301
Monterey, CA, 93942
Phone: (408) 629 - 5189
[email protected]
Costanoan
Esselen
Salinan Tribe of Monterey, San
Luis Obispo Counties
Patti Dutton, Tribal Administrator
7070 Morro Road, Suite A
Atascadero, CA, 93422
Phone: (805) 464 - 2650
[email protected]
Salinan
Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom
Valley Band
Kenneth Woodrow, Chairperson
1179 Rock Haven Ct.

Salinas, CA, 93906
Phone: (831) 443 - 9702
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Mono
Xolon-Salinan Tribe
Karen White, Chairperson
P. O. Box 7045
Spreckels, CA, 93962
Phone: (831) 238 - 1488
[email protected]
Salinan
Rumsen Am:a Tur:ataj Ohlone
Dee Dee Ybarra, Chairperson
14671 Farmington Street
Hesperia, CA, 92345
Phone: (760) 403 - 1756
[email protected]
Costanoan
1 of 1
This list is current only as of the date of this document and is based on the information available to the Commission on the date it was produced. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is applicable only for consultation with Native American tribes under Government Code Sections 65352.3, 65352.4 et seq. and Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed 1 Preston Street Project, Monterey County.

PROJ-2021-
003029
06/01/2021 02:54 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Tribal Consultation List
Monterey County
6/1/2021
1 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
OF THE

SALINAS PLANNING COMMISSION
April 19, 2023
The meeting was called to order at 3:33 p.m. in the City Council Chamber Rotunda.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

WELCOME AND STAFF INTRODUCTIONS
PRESENT: Chairperson Gonzalez, Commissioners Manzo, Meeks, McKelvey Daye and Purnell
ABSENT: Commissioner Donohue
STAFF: Community Development Director, Megan Hunter; Planning Manager, Courtney Grossman; Planning Manager, Grant Leonard; Associate Planner, Oscar Resendiz; Principal-in Charge from Rincon Consultants Inc., Megan Jones; and Administrative Aide, Maira Robles

COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Chairperson Gonzalez opened for public comment at 3:34 p.m.

No public comments were received.

Chairperson Gonzalez closed for public comment at 3:34 p.m.

APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: March 1, 2023
Upon motion by Commissioner Meeks, and a second by Commissioner Purnell, the minutes of March 1, 2023, were approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: Chairperson Gonzalez, Commissioners Manzo, Meeks, McKelvey Daye and Purnell
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Donohue
2 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
General Plan Update Community Engagement and Outreach Strategy Planning Manager, Grant Leonard, presented a PowerPoint presentation, which is on file at the Community Development Department.

Commissioner Manzo requested information regarding the Youth Ambassador Interviews. Mr.

Leonard informed that Youth Ambassador Interviews are made possible through the Sustainable Lands Grant and are the result of a partnership between the City and the Center for Community Advocacy (CCA). The CCA recruits youth ambassadors and trains them to interview other youth in an effort to obtain feedback from community members that would otherwise not engage.

Commissioner Purnell requested details regarding the Focus Groups at High Schools. Mr. Leonard informed that Associate Planner, Monica Gurmilan, who is running the Outreach Strategy will followup in providing details about the Focus Groups.

Chairperson Gonzalez inquired if outreach has primarily focused on housing and if an outreach goal has been set. Mr. Leonard informed that currently the focus is on housing as staff are in the process of drafting and releasing the Housing Element, however, the outreach strategies for community engagement as presented, will also serve as the infrastructure toward gathering input on other elements of the General Plan. Community Development Director, Megan Hunter, informed that as feedback is gathered from various sources and meetings, the city has reached over 5k, and added that staff’s primary goal is to ensure that the General Plan draft is reflective of the community’s input.

Commissioner Meeks inquired if the 5k outreach goal is city-wide. Mr. Leonard confirmed that the goal of 5K goal is city-wide.

Chairperson Gonzalez opened for public comment at 3:46 p.m.

No public comments were received.

Chairperson Gonzalez closed for public comment at 3:46 p.m.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
General Plan Amendment 2022-001 and Rezone 2022-001; Amend the General Plan Land Use Designation from Residential Medium Density (8-15 Units/Acre) to Residential High Density (15-24 Units/Acre) and Rezone from Residential Medium Density (R-M-3.6) to Residential High Density (R-H-2.1) of a vacant 2.6-acre lot located at 1 Preston Street Associate Planner, Oscar Resendiz, presented a PowerPoint presentation, which is on file at the Community Development Department.
3 Commissioner Manzo inquired about the Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (ISMND) as prepared for the project site and inquired about the measures that will be taken to address concerns with regard to parking and walkability of the site and surrounding areas upon development.

Principal-in-Charge Planner from Rincon Consultants Inc., Megan Jones, informed that the analysis of the initial study found that the project’s impact will slightly exceed the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) per capita threshold, therefore, the applicant developing the site will need to prepare and implement a VMT Reduction Program that reduces VMT generated by the project through Pedestrian Network Improvements and the inclusion of bicycle parking. Other measures may include on-site parking reductions, implementation of unbundled parking, affordable housing, incentivizing alternative transportation modes, and a school carpool program.

Commissioner Meeks requested that the PowerPoint slides for project presentations be shared ahead of meetings and that maps include legends for reference. Commissioner Meeks also inquired about the previous use of the project site. Mr. Resendiz informed that the vacant lot was previously a Truck Depot with vehicle maintenance conducted on site.

Commissioner McKelvey Daye inquired about the response from staff to the concerns outlined in the letter received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Mr. Resendiz informed that the comments and concerns identified in the letter were addressed on page 139 of the Final ISMND.

Ms. Jones provided additional details regarding the response to comments and informed that it was determined that there is no impact to the site resulting from hazardous material spills.

Commissioner Purnell inquired about the green space requirements for the site. Mr. Resendiz informed that once an application for development is submitted, the applicant will have to follow regulations for open space requirements.

Commissioner Gonzalez commended the reuse of vacant land as a strategy to help meet housing production goals.

Chairperson Gonzalez opened for public comment at 4:02 p.m.

No public comments were received.

Chairperson Gonzalez closed for public comment at 4:02 p.m.

Commissioner Manzo motioned to approve a Resolution Recommending that the Salinas City Council approve a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the land use designation from Residential Medium Density (8-15 Units/Acre) to Residential High Density (15-24 Units/Acre) and Rezone (RZ) from Residential Medium Density (R-M-3.6) to Residential High Density (R-H-2.1) of a vacant 2.6- acre lot located at 1 Preston Street (GPA 2022-001, RZ 2022-001, ER 2022-009). Commissioner Meeks seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: Chairperson Gonzalez, Commissioners Manzo, Meeks, McKelvey Daye and Purnell
NOES: None
4 ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Donohue

OTHER BUSINESS
General Plan Steering Committee Update
Commissioner Gonzalez commended staff for compiling data from all community engagement work completed to date and for reviewing the initial policy element drafts to ensure that these are reflective of recommendations received from the public.

Mr. Grant informed that the General Plan Steering Committee will not be meeting for the month of April 2023 due to the scheduled community outreach meetings. Regular meetings for the General Plan Steering Committee are expected to resume in May 2023.

FOLLOW UP REPORTS
None

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Planning Manager, Courtney Grossman, informed that a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new 7, 625 s.f. recovery center at 11 Peach Drive, is scheduled for presentation to the Planning Commission on May 3, 2023.

Additionally, a General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Conditional Use Permit for an Extended Stay Hotel is also scheduled for presentation on May 3, 2023.

Commissioner Purnell inquired if notices would be sent to inform of the proposed projects. Mr.

Grossman confirmed notices would be sent to residents and businesses within a 300 radius of the project sites.

ADJOURNMENT
Chairperson Gonzalez reviewed for quorum for May 3, 2023, and adjourned the meeting at 4:09 p.m. ______________________ _______________________

ROSA GONZALEZ COURTNEY GROSSMAN
Chairperson Executive Secretary

SALINAS PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03

RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL

OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (8-15 UNITS/ACRE) TO RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (15-24 UNITS/ACRE) AND REZONE (RZ) FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (R-M-3.6) TO RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (RH-2.1) OF A VACANT 2.6-ACRE LOT LOCATED AT 1 PRESTON STREET (GPA 2022-001, RZ 2022-001, ER 2022-009)
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2023, the Salinas Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment 2022-001 and Rezone 2022-001 of a vacant 2.6-acre lot located at 1 Preston Street as described in more detail below:

1. General Plan Amendment 2022-001 (GPA 2022-001); Change the land use designation from Residential Medium Density (8-15 units/acre) to Residential High Density (15-24 units/acre); and

2. Rezone 2022-001 (RZ 2022-001); Change the Zoning designation from Residential Medium Density (R-M-3.6) to Residential High Density (R-H-2.1).

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission weighed the evidence presented at said public hearing, including the Staff Report which is on file at the Community Development Department together with the record of environmental review; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study and related environmental documents including the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, which is known as ER 2022-009.

WHEREAS, the circulated Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration incorrectly stated the maximum density as 15-20 units/acre when the actual Residential High Density designation is 15-24 units/acre.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Salinas Planning Commission that it recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, approve General Plan Amendment 2022-001 and Rezone 2022-001, adopt the following findings as the basis for its determination, and that the foregoing recitations are true and correct, and are included herein by reference as findings:

For the Mitigated Negative Declaration:

1. The Planning Commission hereby finds that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared with respect to the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder.

Further, this Commission has independently reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study and related environmental documents, together with the comments received during the public review process. On the basis of the whole record before it, the Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will Planning Commission Resolution
General Plan Amendment 2022-001 (GPA 2022-001) and Rezone 2022-001 (RZ2022-001)

have a significant effect on the environment and that the MND reflects the Commission’s independent judgment and analysis. On this basis, the Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

The environmental impacts of the project have been analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An Initial Study was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the project. Based upon review of the Initial Study, the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the mitigation measures outlined in the proposed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been included in the project (see Exhibit “1”). The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were routed to responsible agencies and posted at the County Clerk’s Office on January 27, 2023; the deadline for comments was February 26, 2023. The State Clearinghouse received the document on January 27, 2023; the deadline for Clearinghouse comments was February 26, 2023 (SCH Number 2023010626).

Public comments were received from interested parties and public agencies during the comment period as described below:

1. Comments received via email from Mr. Gavin McCreary, Project Manager, Site Evaluation and Remediation Unit, Site Mitigation and Restoration Program, Department of Toxic Substance Control, On February 9, 2023 with comments attached to the email, stating: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) received a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the 1 Preston Street Project (Project). The Lead Agency is receiving this notice from DTSC because the Project includes one or more of the following: groundbreaking activities, importation of backfill soil, and/or work on or in close proximity to an agricultural or former agricultural site.

DTSC recommends that the following issues be evaluated in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the MND:

1. A State of California environmental regulatory agency such as DTSC, a Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or a local agency that meets the requirements of Health and Safety Code section 101480 should provide regulatory concurrence that the Project site is safe for construction and the proposed use.

2. The MND should acknowledge the potential for historic or future activities on or near the project site to result in the release of hazardous wastes/substances on the project site. In instances in which releases have occurred or may occur, further studies should be carried out to delineate the nature and extent of the contamination, and the potential threat to public health and/or the environment should be evaluated.

The MND should also identify the mechanism(s) to initiate any required investigation and/or remediation and the government agency who will be responsible for providing appropriate regulatory oversight.

3. If any projects initiated as part of the proposed project require the importation of soil to backfill any excavated areas, proper sampling should be conducted to ensure Planning Commission Resolution
General Plan Amendment 2022-001 (GPA 2022-001) and Rezone 2022-001 (RZ2022-001)

that the imported soil is free of contamination. DTSC recommends the imported materials be characterized according to DTSC’s 2001 Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material.

4. If any sites included as part of the proposed project have been used for agricultural, weed abatement or related activities, proper investigation for organochlorinated pesticides should be discussed in the MND. DTSC recommends the current and former agricultural lands be evaluated in accordance with DTSC’s 2008 Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision).

Staff Response: Consultant firm (Rincon Consultants, Inc.) prepared the following response comments to the comments made by Mr. McCreary and Staff provided comments via email to Mr. McCreary.

1. Health and Safety Code section 101480 authorizes a responsible party, as defined, to request that a local officer supervise remedial action if a release of waste occurs, and remedial action is required. As stated in Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Initial Study, no items of potential environmental concern were identified at the project site. Therefore, oversight of a qualified regulatory investigation and no remedial action would be required at this time.

No revisions to the IS-MND are required in response to this comment.

2. Please refer to Section 5, Cultural Resources, of the Initial Study for additional information on historic uses of the project site. As discussed therein, it was found that the project site was generally undeveloped until the 1970s. As stated in Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Initial Study, future operation activities on the project site are not anticipated to release hazardous wastes or substances, but construction activities could result in the transport, storage, or use of potentially hazardous materials. The project would be required to comply with various federal, state, and local regulations, including those set forth by DTSC, which are designed to reduce risks associated with hazardous materials, including potential risks associated with upset or accident conditions.

No items of potential environmental concern were identified at the project site.

Therefore, there are no required investigations or remediation needed, and no revisions to the IS-MND are warranted.

3. According to DTSC, there are currently no established standards within applicable statues and regulations that address environmental requirements for imported fill material.1 Sampling of backfill soil would not be required.

Additionally, the property owner would be liable if contaminated soil were imported to the site. No revisions to the IS-MND are required in response to this comment.

4. Based on review of historical topographic maps from 1910 to 1964, the project site has not been used for agricultural purposes. Furthermore, the project site has not been used for weed abatement or related activities. As discussed within Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, compliance with existing DTSC regulations would reduce the risk of potential release of hazardous materials during demolition, dewatering, soil disturbance/grading, and Planning Commission Resolution
General Plan Amendment 2022-001 (GPA 2022-001) and Rezone 2022-001 (RZ2022-001)

construction. No revisions to the ISMND are required in response to this comment.

For General Plan Amendment 2022-001:

2. That the proposed General Plan Amendment is in conformance with all other goals, policies, programs, and land uses of the Salinas General Plan.

The proposed Amendment is consistent with Salinas General Plan Policies. The proposed General Plan Amendment would change the existing designation for the project site and amend the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Policy Map to align with the proposed rezoning of the site to Residential High Density (15-24 units/acre). The Amendment would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of the adjacent sites of the subject site. The proposed “Residential High Density (15-24 units/acre)” land designation for the project site is consistent with General Plan Goal H-1, by providing a range of housing opportunities to adequately address existing and projected needs to Salinas. The project also complies with General Plan Policy H-1.3, by identify adequate sites to facilitate and encourage housing production for the existing and projected housing needs of the City. In addition, the project complies with General Plan Goal H-2, by maintaining and improving existing neighborhoods and housing stock.

3. That the proposed General Plan Amendment promotes the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare.

The General Plan Amendment promotes the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare because the proposal will create additional housing units the City of Salinas.

For Rezone 2022-001:

4. The amendment is consistent with the Salinas General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan, and other plans and policies adopted by the Salinas City Council.

Per the 2002 Salinas General Plan, the “High-Density Residential” designation allows for development of row houses, condominiums, and apartments. The designation allows a maximum of 24.0 units per net acre (30 with density bonus). Uses such as mobile and modular homes, public facilities, day care, churches and others that are compatible with and oriented toward serving the needs of the high-density neighborhood may also be considered.

The maximum density of this land use designation may be increased in accordance with the density bonus provisions of the California Government Code and the City's Zoning Ordinance.

Per the 2002 Salinas General Plan, Focused Growth Areas are existing urbanized areas where additional growth and/or redevelopment and revitalization would be appropriate and provide Planning Commission Resolution
General Plan Amendment 2022-001 (GPA 2022-001) and Rezone 2022-001 (RZ2022-001)

benefits to the community. By selectively increasing density of development in a manner compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods, the pressure to develop agricultural lands is also reduced.

The project site is currently designated “Residential Medium Density (8-15 du/ac)”. The proposed Amendment is consistent with Salinas General Plan policies. The proposed General Plan Amendment would change the existing designation for the project site and amend the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Policy Map to align with the proposed rezoning of the site to Residential High Density (15-24 du/ac). The Amendment would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of the adjacent site to the east of the subject site.

The proposed “Residential High Density” land use designation is consistent with General Plan Goal H-1, by providing a range of housing opportunities to adequately address existing and projected needs in Salinas. The project also complies with General Plan Policy H-1.3, by identifying adequate sites to facilitate and encourage housing production for the existing and projected housing needs of the City. In addition, the project complies with General Plan Goal H-2, by maintaining and improving existing neighborhoods and housing stock.

Residential- High Density (R-H-2.1) provides for high density multifamily dwelling units where the minimum density is more than 15 dwelling units per net acre and the maximum density is not more than 24 dwelling units per net acre without density bonus. Per Zoning Code Section 37-30.140, the purpose of the “Residential high density (R-H)” land use designation is to provide appropriately located areas for high density and multifamily dwellings consistent with the General Plan and with standards of public health and safety established by the Municipal Code. This includes:
 Provide adequate light, air, privacy, and open space for each dwelling unit and protect residents from the harmful effects of excessive noise, inappropriate population density, traffic congestion, and other adverse environmental impacts.  Promote development of affordable housing, housing for qualifying residents, and day care facilities by providing a density bonus for projects, which meet state and/or city density bonus requirements.
 Achieve design compatibility through the use of site development regulations and design standards.
 Protect adjoining low and medium density residential districts from excessive noise or loss of sun, light, quiet, and privacy resulting from proximity to multifamily dwellings.
 Provide sites for public and semipublic land uses needed to complement residential development or requiring a residential environment.
 Ensure the provision of public services and facilities needed to accommodate planned population densities.
 Encourage attractive and interesting residential streetscapes and high-density developments that are pedestrian-oriented and reflect traditional residential design principles and promote safe residential neighborhoods through the incorporation of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) features in dwelling and site design.

Planning Commission Resolution
General Plan Amendment 2022-001 (GPA 2022-001) and Rezone 2022-001 (RZ2022-001)

In order for the proposed Residential High Density Development Regulations to be permitted, the project site will need to be rezoned “Residential High Density” (R-H). The purpose of the proposed Rezone is to facilitate the production of housing which per R-H-2.1 Zoning Code Section 37-30.150(j)(1) the minimum density is more than 15 dwelling units per net acre and the maximum density is not more than 24 dwelling units per net acre without density bonus.

The proposed rezoning of the project site would be consistent with Residential High Density (R-H) District and Focused Growth (FG) Overlay District. The project would comply with the development regulations and design standards of both the R-H and FG-2 District by:
 Creating healthy neighborhood centers where residents of all economic and cultural backgrounds can live, work, walk, shop, exercise, and spend quality time outdoors.  Increase pedestrian activity by creating neighborhood centers that are conveniently accessed by public transit.
 Encouraging creative architecture and public design that communicate a neighborhood's locale, purpose, priorities, and personality to those who use the space, and create revitalized neighborhoods through infill development and redevelopment activities.

5. The amendment will not have the effect of reversing the policies of the Salinas General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan, and other plans and policies adopted by the Salinas City Council.

There are no policies within the Salinas General Plan that would be reversed as a result of this amendment. There are no Specific Plans or Precise Plans applicable to the site.

6. The amendment would not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent zoning districts.

The proposed rezoning will not create an unrelated zoning district because the rezoning of the project site from “from Residential Medium Density (R-M-3.6) to Residential High Density (R-H-2.1)” would be consistent with the adjacent zoning district to the east of the project site “Residential High Density (R-H-2.1)”.

7. The City has the capability to provide public utilities, roads, and services to serve the uses allowed by the proposed amendment.

Salinas is an urbanized area and public infrastructure is presently in place to serve most uses.

The proposed Rezone would not create the need for additional infrastructure.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 19th day of April 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: Chairperson Gonzalez, Commissioners Manzo, McKelvey, Meeks, and Purnell NOES:

Planning Commission Resolution
General Plan Amendment 2022-001 (GPA 2022-001) and Rezone 2022-001 (RZ2022-001)

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT: Commissioner Donohue
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Salinas, that said Resolution was passed and approved by the affirmative and majority vote of said Planning Commission at a meeting held on April 19, 2023, and that said Resolution has not been modified, amended, or rescinded, and is now in full force and effect.

SALINAS PLANNING COMMISSION
Date:

Courtney Grossman
Secretary
Attach:

Exhibit 1: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Exhibit 2: Proposed General Plan Amendment 2022-001 (GPA 2022-001) Map and Proposed Rezone 2022-001 (RZ 2022-001) Map
\\COSRedirect\User\oscarr\Desktop\1 Preston Street\Planning Commission (PC)\1 Preston Street PC Reso MND.docx

1 Preston Street Project

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
1 PRESTON STREET
(GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-001 AND REZONE 2022-001)
Mitigation
Number
Nature of
Mitigation
Result after
Mitigation
Party
Responsible
for
Implementing

Party Responsible
for Monitoring:

Method to Confirm
Implementation
Timing for
Implementation
BIO-1:

Nesting Bird
Surveys and
Avoidance
To avoid disturbance of nesting and special-status birds or migratory species protected by the MBTA and Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 of the CFGC, activities related to the project site development, including, but not limited to, vegetation removal, shall occur outside of the bird breeding season (February 1 through August 30). If ground disturbance,
vegetation removal or heavy equipment work must begin
within the nesting season, then the project applicant shall submit evidence to the City that a qualified biologist conducted a pre-construction nesting bird survey within 14 days of the start of construction. The nesting bird pre-construction survey shall be conducted within the disturbance footprint and a 300- foot buffer.

If nests are found, an avoidance buffer shall be established by a qualified biologist. The buffer shall be established to ensure nesting activity is not disturbed by construction activity, and shall be determined by the qualified biologist based on the species’ known tolerances, the proposed work activity, and existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site. The buffer shall be demarcated by the biologist with bright construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. All construction personnel shall be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer until the qualified biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting has completed, and the young have fledged the nest, or the nest has become otherwise inactive. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist.

To avoid
disturbance of
nesting and
special-status
birds or
migratory
species
protected by the
MBTA and
Sections 3503,
3503.5, and
3513 of the
CFGC.

Applicant, or
Successor in
Interest.

Development and
Engineering Services
Department -
Community
Development
Department - Current
Planning Division
Within 14 days
prior to the start of
construction.

BIO-2: Coast Pre-construction clearance surveys for coast range newt shall To minimize Applicant, or Development and Within 14 days Exhibit 1

Mitigation
Number
Nature of
Mitigation
Result after
Mitigation
Party
Responsible
for
Implementing

Party Responsible
for Monitoring:

Method to Confirm
Implementation
Timing for
Implementation
Range Newt
Survey and
Avoidance
be conducted within 14 days prior to the start of construction (including staging and mobilization), the surveys shall cover the entire disturbance footprint. A wildlife exclusion fence shall be placed along the top of bank of the adjacent ditch and
maintained regularly to deter wildlife from entering the project area during construction. The project applicant shall submit evidence to the City that a qualified biologist conducted preconstruction clearance surveys for coast range newt no more than 14 days prior to the start of construction.
impacts to coast
range newts.

Successor in
Interest.

Engineering Services
Department -
Community
Development
Department - Current
Planning Division
prior to the start of
construction.

BIO-3:

Western Pond
Turtle
Clearance
Surveys and
Avoidance
Pre-construction clearance surveys for western pond turtle shall be conducted, the surveys shall cover the entire disturbance footprint. A wildlife exclusion fence shall be placed along the top of bank of the adjacent ditch and maintained regularly to deter wildlife from entering the project area during construction. The project applicant shall submit evidence to the City that a qualified biologist conducted pre-construction clearance surveys for western pond turtle no more than 14 days prior to the start of construction.

To minimize
impacts to
western pond
turtles.

Applicant, or
Successor in
Interest.

Development and
Engineering Services
Department -
Community
Development
Department - Current
Planning Division
Within 14 days
prior to the start of
construction.

BIO-4:

Western
Burrowing
Owl Surveys
and
Avoidance
The project applicant shall submit evidence to the City that a qualified biologist conducted pre-construction clearance surveys prior to ground disturbance activities within suitable natural habitats and ruderal areas throughout the project site, to confirm the presence/absence of active western burrowing owl burrows. The surveys shall be consistent with the
recommended survey methodology provided by CDFW (2012).

Clearance surveys shall be conducted within 30 days prior to construction and ground disturbance activities. If no western burrowing owls are observed, no further actions are required. If western burrowing owls are detected during the preconstruction clearance surveys, the following measures shall apply:
• Avoidance buffers during the breeding and nonbreeding season shall be implemented in accordance with the CDFW (2012) and Burrowing Owl
Consortium (1993) minimization mitigation measures.
• If avoidance of western burrowing owls is not feasible, To minimize
impacts to
western
burrowing owls.

Applicant, or
Successor in
Interest.

Community
Development
Department, Current
Planning Division
Within 30 days
prior to the start of
construction.

Mitigation
Number
Nature of
Mitigation
Result after
Mitigation
Party
Responsible
for
Implementing

Party Responsible
for Monitoring:

Method to Confirm
Implementation
Timing for
Implementation
then additional measures such as passive relocation
during the nonbreeding season and construction
buffers of 200 feet during the breeding season shall
be implemented, in consultation with CDFW. In
addition, a Western Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan
and Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be
developed by a qualified biologist in accordance with
the CDFW (2012) and Burrowing Owl Consortium
(1993).

CUL-1:

Unanticipated
Discovery of
Cultural
Resources
If archaeological resources are encountered during grounddisturbing activities, work within 50 feet shall be halted and an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s
Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (National Park Service 1983) shall immediately to evaluate the find pursuant to PRC Section 21083.2. If necessary, the evaluation may require preparation of a treatment plan and archaeological testing for CRHR eligibility. If the discovery proves to be significant under CEQA and cannot be avoided by the project, additional work may be warranted, such as data recovery excavation (described below), to mitigate any significant impacts to significant resources. If the resource is of Native American origin, implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1 may be required. Any reports required to document and/or evaluate unanticipated discoveries shall be submitted to the City for review and approval and submitted to the NWIC after completion. Recommendations contained therein shall be
implemented throughout the remainder of ground disturbance activities.

To ensure
protection of
cultural
resources.

Applicant, or
Successor in
Interest.

Development and
Engineering
Services
Department -
Community
Development
Department
If archaeological
resources are
encountered
during grounddisturbing
activities.

GEO-1:

Paleontologic
al Resources
Monitoring
and Mitigation
For grading or excavation exceeding five feet in depth, the City of Salinas shall require the following:

1. Qualified Paleontologist. The project applicant shall retain a Qualified Paleontologist prior to excavations that will exceed five feet in depth. The Qualified Paleontologist shall direct all mitigation measures related to
paleontological resources. A qualified professional
To ensure
protection of
paleontological
resources.

Applicant, or
Successor in
Interest.

Development and
Engineering
Services
Department -
Community
Development
Department
During grading or
excavation
exceeding five
feet in depth.

Mitigation
Number
Nature of
Mitigation
Result after
Mitigation
Party
Responsible
for
Implementing

Party Responsible
for Monitoring:

Method to Confirm
Implementation
Timing for
Implementation
paleontologist is defined by the Society of Vertebrate
Paleontology (SVP) standards (SVP 2010) as an individual preferably with an M.S. or Ph.D. in paleontology or geology who is experienced with paleontological procedures and
techniques, who is knowledgeable in the geology of
California, and who has worked as a paleontological
mitigation project supervisor for a least two years (SVP 2010).

2. Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness
Program. Prior to the start of construction, the Qualified Paleontologist or his or her designee shall conduct a
paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program
(WEAP) training for construction personnel regarding the appearance of fossils and the procedures for notifying
paleontological staff should fossils be discovered by
construction staff.

3. Paleontological Monitoring. Full-time paleontological monitoring shall be conducted during ground disturbing
construction activities (i.e., grading, trenching, foundation work) of depths greater than five feet within native
(previously undisturbed) sediments. Ground-disturbing
activities that impact artificial fill (previously disturbed) sediments only do not require paleontological monitoring.

Paleontological monitoring shall be conducted by a
qualified paleontological monitor, who is defined as an individual who has experience with collection and salvage of paleontological resources and meets the minimum
standards of the SVP (2010) for a Paleontological
Resources Monitor. The duration and timing of the
monitoring will be determined by the Qualified
Paleontologist based on the observation of the geologic setting from initial ground disturbance, and subject to the review and approval by the City of Salinas.

4. Final Paleontological Mitigation Report. Upon
completion of ground disturbing activity (and curation of fossils if necessary) the Qualified Paleontologist shall prepare a final report describing the results of the

Mitigation
Number
Nature of
Mitigation
Result after
Mitigation
Party
Responsible
for
Implementing

Party Responsible
for Monitoring:

Method to Confirm
Implementation
Timing for
Implementation
paleontological monitoring efforts associated with the
project. The report shall include a summary of the field and laboratory methods, an overview of the project geology and paleontology, a list of taxa recovered (if any), an analysis of fossils recovered (if any) and their scientific significance, and recommendations. The report shall be submitted to the City of Salinas Community Development Department. If the monitoring efforts produced fossils, then a copy of the report shall also be submitted to the designated museum repository.

TRA-1: VMT
Reduction
Program
The applicant shall prepare and implement a VMT Reduction Program that reduces VMT generated by the project to VMT per capita of 9.95. The following two strategies shall be included in the Program:

Pedestrian Network Improvements. Construct pedestrian
facilities to connect the site to existing pedestrian facilities on Preston Street. Creating safe pedestrian connections would encourage future residents to walk instead of drive.

Include Bike Parking, Pursuant to SMC Section 37-50.400.

Provide bicycle parking on site, which would encourage future residents to bike instead of drive.

In addition to the above strategies, one or several of the following travel demand management strategies shall be
considered for inclusion in the VMT Reduction Program, to achieve a VMT per capita of 9.7 or less:

Reduce On-Site Parking. Reduce the number of on-site
parking spaces for future residents to less than what is required by SMC Section 20-85; or
Implement Unbundled Parking. Separate or “unbundle”
parking costs from leases or property costs, requiring those that wish to purchase parking spaces to do so at an additional cost; or
Affordable Housing. Provide affordable, below market-rate housing on site; or
Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Pattern. Implement a
travel behavior change program by offering incentives to future residents to utilize alternative transportation modes, with at To reduce
vehicle miles
traveled per
capita.

Applicant, or
Successor in
Interest.

Public Works
Department – Traffic
Engineering -
Community
Development
Department -
Current Planning
Prior to issuance
of a building
permit.

Mitigation
Number
Nature of
Mitigation
Result after
Mitigation
Party
Responsible
for
Implementing

Party Responsible
for Monitoring:

Method to Confirm
Implementation
Timing for
Implementation
least 75 percent of future residents participating; and Promotions and Marketing. Provide future residents with information regarding alternative transportation and travel demand management programs, with at least 75 percent of future residents participating; and
School Carpool Program. Implement a school carpool
program among future residents of the project site.

The VMT Reduction Program shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit and shall demonstrate that the net VMT per capita would be 9.7 or less, using a combination of travel demand management
strategies approved by the City.

TCR-1:

Inadvertent
Discoveries
During
Construction
In the event that cultural resources of Native American origin are identified during grading or construction, all earth disturbing work within the vicinity of the find shall be temporarily suspended or redirected until a qualified archaeologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find; an appropriate Native American representative, based on the nature of the find, is consulted; and mitigation measures are put in place for the disposition and protection of any find pursuant to PRC Section 21083.2. If the City, in consultation with local Native Americans, determines that the resource is a tribal cultural resource and thus significant under CEQA, a mitigation plan shall be prepared and implemented in accordance with state guidelines and in consultation with local Native American group(s) prior to continuation of any earth disturbing work within the vicinity of the find. The plan shall include avoidance of the resource or, if avoidance of the resource is infeasible, shall outline the appropriate treatment of the resource in coordination with the appropriate local Native American tribal representative and, if applicable, a qualified archaeologist. Examples of appropriate mitigation for tribal cultural resources include, but are not limited to, protecting the cultural character and integrity of the resource, protecting traditional use of the resource, protecting the confidentiality of the resource, or heritage recovery.

To ensure
protection of onsite tribal
cultural
resources.

Applicant, or
Successor in
Interest.

Development and
Engineering
Services
Department -
Community
Development
Department
If cultural
resources of
Native American
origin are
identified during
grading or
construction.
\\COSRedirect\User\oscarr\Desktop\1 Preston Street\Planning Commission (PC)\1 Preston Street - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.doc EXHIBIT 2

PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AND ZONING CODE
DESIGNATIONS:
1 Preston Street (APN: 003-161-008-000)
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-001 AND REZONE 2022-001;

AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM
RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (8-15 UNITS/ACRE) TO
RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (15-24 UNITS/ACRE) AND REZONE
FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (R-M-3.6) TO
RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (R-H-2.1) OF A VACANT 2.6 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 1 PRESTON STREET
Oscar Resendiz, Associate Planner
Grant Leonard, Planning Manager
Community Development Department
City Council Hearing
Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Background
 Project Area
 One (1) site totaling 2.6-acres
 Approximately 129,202 square feet (sf)
 Project Objectives
 Change the General Plan land use designation from
Medium Density Residential (8-15 units/acre) to High
Density Residential (15-24 units/acre)
 Rezone from Residential Medium Density (R-M-3.6)
to Residential High Density (R-H-2.1)
 Encourage the development of higher density
development that would provide new housing that
would be consistent with the Salinas General Plan
 Facilitate development of up to approximately 76
(anticipating a density bonus)
GPA 2022-001 / Rezone 2022-001
Environmental Review
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration routed to responsible agencies on January 27, 2023:
 The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the mitigation measures outlined in the proposed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been included in the project.
 State Clearinghouse – January 27, 2023 (SCH Number 2023010626).  Posted County Clerk’s Office - January 27, 2023
 Routed to responsible agencies – January 27, 2023
 Deadline for comments – February 26, 2023
Public Notice
 Published in Monterey Herald – 05/05/2023
 Mailed – 05/04/2023; and
 Posted – 05/04/2023
Recommended Motion

1. Approve a resolution affirming the findings, adopting the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program, and approving a
General Plan Amendment (GPA 2022-001) changing the
General Plan Land Use designation from Residential
Medium Density to Residential High Density; and

2. Adopt an Ordinance to Rezone from Residential Medium Density to Residential High Density (RZ 2022-001).

City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-268, Version: 1
Parking Citation Fee Update
Approve a Resolution adopting the updated schedule of parking citation fines.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/10/2023
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 16, 2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/POLICE
FROM: ROBERTO FILICE, CHIEF OF POLICE

DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: ANDREW EASTERLING, TRAFFIC ENGINEER

ANISSA TORRES, MANAGEMENT ANALYST

TONYA ERICKSON, POLICE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR
TITLE: PARKING CITATION FEE UPDATE
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion approving a Resolution adopting the updated schedule of parking citation fines (Attachment 1).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The last time the City updated the parking citation fee schedule was in 2017 and 2018. The last fee update included fees for many but not all of the municipal code and California Vehicle Code parking violations. City staff are proposing a fee update which establishes citation amounts for all of the municipal code and California Vehicle Code violations and eliminates obsolete or duplicate codes. City staff has completed a comparative analysis of nearby jurisdictions and is recommending a proposed parking citation fee update. The proposed parking citation fee update includes a complete list of parking citations and establishes a comparable rate to nearby agencies.

BACKGROUND:

In 1992, the State of California passed Assembly Bill 408, which allowed agencies to establish their own parking citation fines. The City of Salinas is allowed to establish the amount of parking violation citation fees. However, the California Vehicle Code Section 40203.5 states, “to the extent possible, issuing agencies within the same county shall standardize parking penalties.”.

The City of Salinas established a bail schedule for parking violations in 1994 (Attachment 2). The bail schedule was increased in 2004 (Attachment 3) and then updated again in 2017 (Attachment 4). In 2018 three (3) new municipal code parking violations were added for oversize vehicles (Attachment 5). Throughout all of the updates there remain several municipal code and California Vehicle Code violations that the City does not currently have an adopted citation fee for. The Page | 2
proposed parking citation fee update includes a complete and comprehensive list of parking citations and establishes a comparable rate to nearby agencies, in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 40203.5.

City staff has prepared the proposed schedule of parking citation fines (Attachment 1). The update includes a complete fee schedule for every municipal code and California Vehicle Code violation used by parties conducting Parking Enforcement in the City of Salinas. In accordance with California Vehicle Code requirements, staff completed a comparative analysis of parking fines adopted in nearby cities. Several nearby cities were non-responsive and City staff were not able to obtain rates from every agency within the County. The analysis includes Monterey, Marina, Seaside, Carmel by the Sea, Soledad, and Greenfield. King City and Gonzales were nonresponsive to staff requests. Each city may have different municipal code violations, and not every responsive City had a complete bail schedule for all of the parking-related municipal codes and California Vehicle Code violations. In order to have a more complete sampling of other agencies, City staff also included a comparison to Watsonville, Santa Cruz, and Gilroy to supplement the available data from within the County.

The attached proposed updated schedule of parking citation fees provides a comparison of the available parking citation fees for similar violations from other nearby cities. City staff has included an average calculation from the available data for comparison. In some cases, there are notable statistical outliers in the sample that effects the average calculation, and some consideration was given to their effect. Generally, staff’s recommended citation fee amount is based off of the average calculation rounded to the nearest $5 increment or aligned with similar types of parking violations. The baseline parking violation was set at $45 for many of the common parking violations. Citations for code sections with similar or the same violation are proposed with consistent citation fee amounts to standardize the fee schedule as much as possible.

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION:

The parking citation fee update was presented to the Traffic and Transportation Commission at its January 12, 2023, meeting. Commissioner Cox recommended modifying the proposed fee schedule to align citations CVC 4000(a)(1): Expired Registration, and CVC 5204(a): Tab not displayed closer to the surveyed average. An amended motion was made to recommend City Council approve the parking citation fee schedule (Attachment 1), with the exception of violations CVC 4000(a)(1): Expired Registration set to $65, and CVC 5204(a): Tab no Displayed set to $55.

The Commission voted (5-0) to approve the amended recommendation to approve the parking citation fee schedule (Attachment 1), with the exception of violations CVC 4000(a)(1): Expired Registration set to $65, and CVC 5204(a): Tab no Displayed set to $55.

FINANCE COMMITTEE:

The parking citation fee update was presented to the Finance Committee at its March 7, 2023, meeting. The Committee voted (2-1) to approve the proposed parking citation fee schedule (Attachment 1). Where as committee members Craig, and Osornio voted in support of the item and committee member Rocha voted against the item.

Page | 3
CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15378 and 15061(b)(3).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Parking enforcement is a public service which supports the Council’s initiatives of “Public Safety”, “Economic Development,” and “Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability”. Parking regulations may exist for a variety of reasons. Red zones, and other no parking zones are typically established for public safety purposes to keep sight lines clear or to provide emergency service access. Occasional, parking regulations may be used to support businesses and provide parking turnover for customer convenience. In some cases, parking regulations also serve provide sweepers access to the curb to improve infrastructure and environmental sustainability.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There is no impact to the General Fund. The Parking Enforcement Program is an enterprise account where the revenues offset the operating cost. The proposed updated schedule of parking citation fines is not anticipated to substantially change the Parking Enforcement Program operations.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Attachment 1: Proposed Schedule of Parking Citation Fines Attachment 2: Bail Schedule Comparison
Attachment 3: 1994 Schedule for Parking Violations
Attachment 4: 2004 Parking Fines Update
Attachment 5: 2017 Parking Fines Update
Attachment 6: 2018 Parking Fines Update
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING THE UPDATED

SCHEDULE OF PARKING CITATION FINES
WHEREAS, the last time the City updated the parking citation fee schedule was in 2017 and 2018; and
WHEREAS, the last fee update included fees for many but not all of the municipal code and California Vehicle Code parking violations; and
WHEREAS, City staff are proposing a fee update which establishes citation amounts for all of the municipal code and California Vehicle Code violations, and eliminates obsolete or duplicate codes. City staff has completed a comparative analysis of nearby jurisdictions and is recommending a proposed parking citation fee update; and WHEREAS, the proposed parking citation fee update includes a complete list of parking citations and establishes a comparable rate to nearby agencies; and WHEREAS, the Commission voted (5-0) to approve an amended recommendation to approve the parking citation fee schedule (Attachment 1), with the exception of violations CVC 4000(a)(1): Expired Registration set to $65, and CVC 5204(a): Tab no Displayed set to $55; and WHEREAS, the Finance Committee voted (2-1) to approve the proposed parking citation fee schedule (Attachment 1); and
WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the implementing the parking restrictions is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1). The project consists of the operation, repair, or minor alteration of public streets involving no expansion of use. There would be no significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby adopts the updated schedule of parking citation fines (Attachment 1).

PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of May 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
2 APPROVED:
________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Attachment 1: Proposed Schedule of Parking Citation Fines Salinas Municipal Code
Salinas
Municipal
Code Violation Description Existing Average Proposed Comments 20-4(b)
Interference/obstruction of officers (ex: tire-chalk
removal) N/A $75.00 $75.00 New Fine, amount based upon average 20-

18.020(1st) Oversize vehicles $44.00 $62.21 $50.00
Adjust, though less than average due to unique
structure charging for 1st, 2nd & 3rd offenses.
20-

18.020(2nd) Oversize vehicles $150.00 N/A $150.00 No change 20-

18.020(3rd
+) Oversize vehicles $250.00 N/A $250.00 No change
20-48 Parking prohibited in certain places $44.00 $47.83 $50.00 Increase to align with average 20-49(a) Parking in excess of 72 hours $50.00 $56.55 $50.00 No change - lower than average due to outliers 20-50(b) Repair or greasing vehicle on roadway $44.00 $49.81 $50.00 Increase to align with average 20-50(c) Washing vehicle as business on roadway $30.00 $59.10 $50.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations.

New amount is lower than average due to
outliers
20-50.1(a) Vehicle. for sale on public streets and prop $150.00 $47.08 $50.00 Decreased to align with fine for similar
violations.
20-52(b) Angle parking $30.00 $37.25 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-54 Parking in parkways prohibited $54.00 $40.33 $45.00 Decrease to baseline which is closer to average 20-55(b) Parking adjacent to schools prohibited $44.00 $46.50 $45.00 Increase to align with average 20-56(c) Parking where prohibited by signs $44.00 $48.71 $50.00 Increase to align with average 20-59
Display of Warning Device when Commercial
Vehicle Disabled $70.00 $55.00 $55.00 Decrease to align with Marina 20-59.1(a) Failure to park in designated space $44.00 $37.25 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations.

New amount is lower than average due to
outliers.
20-73(b) Parking prohibited in bus zone $50.00 $163.00 $50.00 No change - lower than average due to outlier 20-74(a)(1) Red Zone $48.00 $34.00 $50.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-74(a)(4) Green Zone $44.00 $34.00 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-76 Parking in yellow loading zone $44.00 $44.50 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-77 Parking in white passenger loading zone $44.00 $43.60 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-77.1 Parking prohibited in taxicab zones $44.00 $46.00 $45.00 Increase to align with average 20-78(a)
Parking prohibited in alleys except
loading/unloading (max 5 min) $44.00 $45.10 $45.00 Increase to align with average 20-78(b) Parking prohibited in alleys if blocking traffic $44.00 $45.10 $45.00 Increase to align with average 20-78(c)
Parking prohibited adjacent to alley if vehicle
blocks alley $30.00 $44.38 $45.00 Increase to align with average 20-79(b)
Time designated parking - streets (includes District
3A) $44.00 $40.50 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-80(b) Parking prohibited 4:30-6:00pm $30.00 $42.00 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-81(b) No parking zone $44.00 $50.90 $45.00
Increase to align with average, and with fine for
similar violations.
20-82(b) Parking prohibited 3:00am to 5:00am $30.00 $38.60 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-85(b) Failure to park in designated space/lot $44.00 $40.50 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-85(c) Failure to park in designated space - parallel $30.00 $40.50 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-85(e)
Parking prohibited when signed parking for City
vehicles only $30.00 N/A $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-86 Overtime parking - lot $38.00 $40.50 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 20-100 Prkd on st by com veh proh over 6000 lb $90.00 $64.75 $90.00 Maintain current approved bail amount 20-100.1(a) Vehicle over 10,000 lbs $100.00 $64.75 $100.00 Maintain current approved bail amount 20-229(g)
3A Failure to Display Permit $44.00 $47.40 $45.00 Increase to align with average 28-14(m) Failure to park in designated area $44.00 $40.00 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 28-14(v)
To remain in any public park at any time between
time posted for closing $44.00 $47.00 $45.00 Increase to align with average 28-14(x) Driving or parking on grass $44.00 $45.00 $45.00 Increase to align with average California Vehicle Code
Vehicle
Code Violation Description Existing Average Proposed Comments 4000(a)(1) Expired Registration $50.00 $62.75 $90.00
Correctable Violation - Adjusted to align all
Registration/License plate violations
4462(b) False evidence of registration $50.00 $73.83 $90.00 Not correctable, but intentional action required -
Adjusted to align all registration/license plate
violations
4464 Altered license plate $44.00 $89.25 $90.00
Not correctable, but Intentional action required -
Adjusted to align all Registration/License plate
violations
5200 No license plate $50.00 $47.75 $90.00
Correctable Violation - Adjusted to align all
Registration/License plate violations
5201(a) Improper display of plates $38.00 $45.50 $90.00 Correctable Violation - Adjusted to align all
Registration/License plate violations
5201(d) Obscured Plate $24.00 $45.50 $90.00
Correctable Violation - Adjusted to align all
Registration/License plate violations
5202(a) Invalid plates displayed $24.00 $66.00 $90.00
Correctable Violation - Adjusted to align all
Registration/License plate violations
5204(a) Tab not displayed $90.00 $53.58 $90.00
Correctable Violation - Adjusted to align all
Registration/License plate violations
21113(a) Parking prohibited on public grounds $30.00 $37.25 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 21211 Blocking bicycle path $50.00 $45.50 $45.00 Decrease to align with fine for similar violations 22500(a) Parked in intersection $30.00 $37.31 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations. 22500(b) Parked on crosswalk $30.00 $37.31 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations. 22500(c) Parked in safety zone $30.00 $37.25 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations. 22500(d) Parked in front of fire station $30.00 $38.92 $50.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22500(e)(1) Parked in front of driveway $30.00 $38.06 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22500(f) Parked on sidewalk $30.00 $37.61 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22500(g) Parked alongside a highway, obstruction $30.00 $37.25 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22500(h)
Parked on roadway side of vehicle (double
parking) $30.00 $38.35 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22500(i) Parked in red bus zone $310.00 $176.64 $310.00 Maintain current approved bail amount. Align
with other obstructing ADA access violations.
22500(j) Parked in tube or tunnel $30.00 $39.70 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22500(k) Parked upon a bridge $30.00 $39.70 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22500(l) Parked in front of wheelchair access to sidewalk $50.00 $295.50 $310.00 Increase to align with other obstructing ADA
access violations.
22500.1 Parked in fire lane $90.00 $71.56 $90.00 Maintain current approved bail amount 22502(a) Pkg over 18" from the curb $44.00 $36.41 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22502(e) Parked over 18" from left side on one-way $44.00 $36.83 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22505(b) Parking in restricted area posted $44.00 $42.83 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22507.8(a) Parked in handicapped zone $310.00 $284.32 $310.00 Maintain current approved bail amount. Align
with other obstructing ADA access violations.
22507.8(b) Obstructing access to handicapped zone $280.00 $287.75 $310.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22507.8(c) Parked on handicapped/loading zone $310.00 $287.75 $310.00 Maintain current approved bail amount. Align
with other obstructing ADA access violations.
22509 Failure to curb wheels on hill $30.00 $83.33 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22513(a)(1) Tow car parking on freeway to offer services $30.00 $48.00 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22514 Fire hydrant $55.00 $44.65 $55.00 Maintain current approved bail amount 22515(a) Failure to set parking brake $30.00 $41.70 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22516 Parking, person locked in vehicle $30.00 $48.75 $45.00 Increase to align with average 22521 Parked upon or near railroad track within 7.5 feet $30.00 $37.20 $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22523(a) Abandoned vehicle on public roadway $275.00 $178.38 $275.00 Maintain current approved bail amount 22523(b) Abandoned vehicle on public or private prop $275.00 $108.00 $275.00 Maintain current approved bail amount 22651(b) Parked in roadway $44.00 N/A $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22651(l) Parked in construction zone $30.00 N/A $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 22651(m) Posted no parking $44.00 N/A $45.00 Increase to align with fine for similar violations 27155 No fuel cap $30.00 $64.35 $45.00 Keep?
Attachment 2: Bail Schedule Comparison
Salinas Municipal Code
Salinas
Municipal
Code Violation Description
City of
Monterey
City of
Marina Seaside CSUMB
Carmel by
the Sea
City of
Soledad
City of
Greenfield
City of
Watsonville
City of
Santa Cruz King City
City of
Gilroy
20-4(b)
Interference/obstruction of
officers (ex: tire-chalk
removal) $85.00 $100.00 $47.00 $68.00
20-

18.020(1st) Oversize vehicles $110.00 $105.00 $47.50 $40.00 $47.00 $43.00 $43.00 20-

18.020(2nd) Oversize vehicles
20-

18.020(3rd
+) Oversize vehicles
20-48
Parking prohibited in certain
places $100.00 $55.00 $37.50 $50.00 $25.00 $47.00 $48.00 $25.00 $43.00 20-49(a) Parking in excess of 72 hours $110.00 $55.00 $42.50 $50.00 $25.00 $50.00 $47.00 $118.00 $25.00 $43.00 20-50(b)
Repair or greasing vehicle on
roadway $55.00 $112.50 $25.00 $40.00 $47.00 $51.00 $25.00 $43.00 20-50(c)
Washing vehicle as business
on roadway $55.00 $112.50 $30.00 $47.00 $51.00
20-50.1(a)
Veh. for sale on public
streets and prop $55.00 $47.50 $50.00 $40.00 $47.00 $43.00 20-52(b) Angle parking $35.00 $35.00 $40.00 $30.00 $47.00 $43.00 $25.00 $43.00 20-54
Parking in parkways
prohibited $30.00 $48.00 $43.00
20-55(b)
Parking adjacent to schools
prohibited $45.00 $48.00
20-56(c)
Parking where prohibited by
signs $100.00 $55.00 $40.00 $30.00 $48.00 $25.00 $43.00 20-59
Display of Warning Device
when Commercial Veh
Disabled $55.00
20-59.1(a)
Failure to park in designated
space $35.00 $35.00 $40.00 $30.00 $47.00 $43.00 $25.00 $43.00 20 -73(b)
Parking prohibited in bus
zone $45.00 $281.00
20-74(a)(1) Red Zone $43.00 $25.00
20-74(a)(4) Green Zone
20-76
Parking in yellow loading
zone $45.00 $47.00 $43.00 $43.00
20-77
Parking in white passenger
loading $45.00 $40.00 $47.00 $43.00 $43.00
20-77.1
Parking prohibited in taxicab
zones $47.00 $48.00 $43.00
20-78(a)
Parking prohibited in alleys
except loading/unloading
(max 5 min) $45.00 $42.50 $47.00 $48.00 $43.00
20-78(b)
Parking prohibited in alleys if
blocking traffic $45.00 $42.50 $47.00 $48.00 $43.00
20-78(c)
Parking prohibited adjacent
to alley if vehicle blocks alley $45.00 $42.50 $47.00 $43.00 20-79(b)
Time designated parking -
streets (includes District 3A) $35.00 $35.00 $40.00 $47.00 $43.00 $43.00 20-80(b)
Parking prohibited 4:30-
6:00pm $35.00 $47.00 $43.00 $43.00
20-81(b) No parking zone $100.00 $42.50 $40.00 $47.00 $25.00 20-82(b)
Parking prohibited 3:00am to
5:00am $35.00 $47.00 $43.00 $25.00 $43.00
20-85(b)
Failure to park in designated
space/lot $35.00 $35.00 $40.00 $47.00 $43.00 $43.00
20-85(c)
Failure to park in designated
space - parallel $35.00 $35.00 $40.00 $47.00 $43.00 $43.00 20-85(e)
Parking prohibited when
signed parking for City
vehicles only
20-86 Overtime parking - lot $35.00 $35.00 $40.00 $47.00 $43.00 $43.00 20-100
Prkd on st by com veh proh
over 6000
lb $110.00 $105.00 $47.50 $40.00 $43.00 $43.00
20-100.1(a) Vehicle over 10,000 lbs $110.00 $105.00 $47.50 $40.00 $43.00 $43.00 20-229(g)
3A Failure to Display Permit $35.00 $40.00 $47.00 $58.00 $57.00 28-14(m)
Failure to park in designated
area $35.00 $35.00 $40.00 $47.00 $43.00
28-14(v)
To remain in any public park
at any time between time
posted for closing $47.00
28-14(x) Driving or parking on grass $45.00
California Vehicle Code
Vehicle
Code Violation Description
City of
Monterey
City of
Marina Seaside CSUMB
Carmel by
the Sea
City of
Soledad
City of
Greenfield
City of
Watsonville
City of
Santa Cruz
City of
Gilroy
4000(a)(1) Expired Registration $50.00 $62.50 $45.00 $100.00 $66.00 $53.00 4462(b) False evidence of registration $112.50 $66.00 $43.00 4464 Altered license plate $112.50 $66.00
5200 No license plate $20.00 $47.50 $100.00 $25.00 $66.00 $28.00 5201(a) Improper display of plates $25.00 $66.00
5201(d) Obscured Plate $25.00 $66.00
5202(a) Invalid plates displayed $66.00
5204(a) Tab not displayed $60.00 $42.50 $100.00 $25.00 $66.00 $28.00 21113(a)
Parking prohibited on public
grounds $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $25.00 $48.00 $43.00
21211 Blocking bicycle path $48.00 $43.00
22500(a) Parked in intersection $35.00 $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $40.00 $25.00 $48.00 $43.00 22500(b) Parked on crosswalk $35.00 $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $40.00 $25.00 $48.00 $43.00 22500(c) Parked in safety zone $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $25.00 $48.00 $43.00 22500(d) Parked in front of fire station $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $25.00 $58.00 $43.00 22500(e)(1) Parked in front of driveway $35.00 $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $50.00 $25.00 $30.00 $48.00 $47.00 22500(f) Parked on sidewalk $35.00 $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $50.00 $25.00 $30.00 $48.00 $43.00 22500(g)
Parked alongside a highway,
obstruction $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $25.00 $48.00 $43.00
22500(h)
Parked on roadway side of
vehicle (double parking) $35.00 $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $50.00 $25.00 $30.00 $68.00 $25.00 $43.00 22500(i) Parked in red bus zone $35.00 $250.00 $262.50 $100.00 $40.00 $268.00 $281.00 22500(j) Parked in tube or tunnel $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $48.00 $43.00 22500(k) Parked upon a bridge $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $48.00 $43.00 22500(l)
Parked in front of wheelchair
access to sidewalk $287.50 $293.00 $306.00
22500.1 Parked in fire lane $144.00 $30.00 $42.50 $50.00 $150.00 $50.00 $50.00 $56.00 22502(a) Pkg over 18" from the curb $35.00 $25.00 $37.50 $45.00 $40.00 $25.00 $30.00 $47.00 $48.00 $25.00 $43.00 22502(e)
Parked over 18" from left
side on one-way $37.50 $25.00 $48.00
22505(b)
Parking in restricted area
posted $37.50 $48.00 $43.00
22507.8(a) Parked in handicapped zone $285.00 $275.00 $287.50 $275.00 $275.00 $280.00 $280.00 $296.00 $293.00 $275.00 $306.00 22507.8(b)
Obstructing access to
handicapped zone $285.00 $275.00 $287.50 $280.00 $293.00 $306.00 22507.8(c)
Parked on
handicapped/loading zone $285.00 $275.00 $287.50 $280.00 $293.00 $306.00 22509 Failure to curb wheels on hill $100.00 $47.00 $103.00 22513(a)(1)
Tow car parking on freeway
to offer services $48.00
22514 Fire hydrant $60.00 $35.00 $47.50 $50.00 $50.00 $25.00 $30.00 $68.00 $25.00 $56.00 22515(a) Failure to set parking brake $35.00 $37.50 $45.00 $48.00 $43.00 22516
Parking, person locked in
vehicle $52.50 $45.00
22521
Parked upon or near railroad
track within 7.5 feet $25.00 $45.00 $25.00 $48.00 $43.00 22523(a)
Abandoned vehicle on public
roadway $270.00 $217.50 $118.00 $108.00
22523(b)
Abandoned vehicle on public
or private prop $108.00
22651(b) Parked in roadway
22651(l) Parked in construction zone
22651(m) Posted no parking
27155 No fuel cap $62.70 $66.00

Exhibit A - Proposed Parking Enforcement Fine Increases Municipal
Code
Violation Description Current
Bail
Amount
Proposed Increase
20-36 Riding on sidewalk $39 $44.00 $5.00
20-48 Parking prohibited in certain places $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-49a Parking in excess of 72 hours $39 $50.00 $11.00
20-50(a) Display of vehicle for sale on roadway $131 $150.00 $19.00 20-50(b) Repair or greasing vehicle on roadway $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-50.1(a) Veh. for sale on public streets and prop $131 $150.00 $19.00 20-54 Parking in parkways prohibited $49 $54.00 $5.00
20-55(b) Parking adjacent to schools prohibited $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-56(b) Parking where prohibited by signs $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-56(c) Parked veh over 6 feet in proh area $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-57(b) Parking where prohibited by sign $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-59.1(a) Failure to park in designated space $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-73 Parked in bus zone $39 $50.00 $11.00
20-73(b) Parking prohibited in bus zone $39 $50.00 $11.00 20-74(3) White loading/unloading zone $39 $44.00 $5.00
20-74(a)(1) Red Zone $39 $48.00 $9.00
20-74(a)(2) Yellow Zone $39 $44.00 $5.00
20-74(b) Parked proh. in red/green zone sec c $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-74(c) Parking proh. in red or green zone $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-75(a) Parked proh. in loading zone cite 20-76 $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-75(c) Parked proh. in loading zone cite 20-77 $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-76 Parking proh. in yellow loading zone $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-77 Parking prohibited in passenger loading $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-77.1 Parking prohibited in taxicab zones $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-78(a) Parking prohibited in alleys $39 $44.00 $5.00
20-78(b) Parking prohibited in alleys $39 $44.00 $5.00
20-78(d) Parking prohibited in alley $39 $44.00 $5.00
20-79(b) Overtime parking - streets $39 $44.00 $5.00
20-79(b)-3 Overtime parking - streets Distr 3 $33 $44.00 $11.00 20-81(b) Parking prohibited in no parking zone $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-85(b) Failure to park in designated space/lot $39 $44.00 $5.00 20-86 Overtime parking - lot $33 $38.00 $5.00
20-90 Parked on private prop w/o permission $39 $50.00 $11.00 20-99(b) Parked on st by trucks over 6000 lb
proh
$80 $90.00 $10.00
20-100 Prkd on st by com veh proh over 6000
lb
$80 $90.00 $10.00
20-100(b) Parked on streets by commercial veh
proh
$90 $100.00 $10.00
20-100.1 Vehicle over 10,000 lbs $90 $100.00 $10.00
20-229(e)-3 Unauthorized Permit Displayed $38 $44.00 $6.00 20-229(g)-
3A
Failure to Display Permit $38 $44.00 $6.00
20-229(g)-3B Improper Display of Permit $38 $44.00 $6.00 28-14(m) Failure to park in designated area $39 $44.00 $5.00 28-14(x) Driving or parking on grass $39 $44.00 $5.00
DMV Code Violation Description Current
Bail
Amount
Proposed Increase
4462(b) False evidence of registration $39 $50.00 $11.00 4464 Altered license plate $39 $44.00 $5.00
5200 No license plate $39 $50.00 $11.00
5201(a) Improper display of plates $33 $38.00 $5.00
5202(a) Unregistered $80 $85.00 $5.00
5204(a) Tab not displayed $80 $90.00 $10.00
21211 Blocking bicycle path $39 $50.00 $11.00
22500(i) Parked in red zone-bus zone $39 $310.00 $271.00 22500(l) Parked in wheelchair access to
sidewalk
$39 $50.00 $11.00
22500.1 Parking in fire lane $80 $90.00 $10.00
22502(a) Pkg over 18" from the curb $39 $44.00 $5.00
22502(e) Parked over 18" from lft side on one
way
$39 $44.00 $5.00
22505(b) Parking in restricted area posted $39 $44.00 $5.00 22507.8 Parked in handicapped parking $296 $310.00 $14.00 22507.8(a) Parked in handicapped zone $296 $310.00 $14.00 22507.8(c) Parked on handicapped/loading zone $296 $310.00 $14.00 22514 Fire hydrant $49 $55.00 $6.00
22522 Parked within 3 inches of access ramp $39 $310.00 $271.00 22523(a) Abandoned vehicle on public roadway $265 $275.00 $10.00 22523(b) Abandoned vehicle on private prop $265 $275.00 $10.00 22651(b) Parked in roadway $39 $44.00 $5.00
22651(m) Posted no parking $39 $44.00 $5.00
Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. 21470 (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING PARKING FINES UPDATE FOR THE CITY OF

SALINAS
WHEREAS, Section 40203.5 of California Vehicle Code gives the City authority to set parking penalties for parking violations; and
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2018, the Salinas Council adopted Ordinance No. 2604 to prohibit certain over-sized vehicles from parking in the city limits; and WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the current parking fines schedule and has determined that there currently is no parking fine for parking an over-sized vehicle in violation of Ordinance No. 2604 and therefore desires to add a parking fine for such violations to the City’s Parking Enforcement Program Bail Schedule.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby establishes a monetary penalty in the amount of $44.00 for the first violation, $150.00 for the second violation, and $250.00 for the third and subsequent violations of Ordinance No. 2604; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said fees are to be effective on September 4, 2018; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the monetary penalties set forth in this Resolution are in addition to whatever other penalties and sanctions are provided for in Ordinance No. 2604.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 4
th
day of September 2018, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: Barrera, Craig, Davis, De La Rosa, McShane, Villegas and Mayor Gunter
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
APPROVED:
________________________
Joe Gunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8D5B922C-FC88-4E08-9E54-5038E08CFA65 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-348, Version: 1
Minutes
Approve minutes of May 2, 2023.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/10/2023
powered by Legistar™
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-351, Version: 1
Financial Claims
Approve financial claims report.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/10/2023
powered by Legistar™
Number Date Status Payee Name Transaction Amount
466305 05/02/2023 Open Alejandro Limon $1,337.56
466306 05/02/2023 Open Cristina Gonzales $82.75
466307 05/02/2023 Open Daisy Gallardo $221.39
466308 05/02/2023 Open Hilda Peralta $82.75
466309 05/02/2023 Open Hue Manalo $284.61
466310 05/02/2023 Open James McGann $18.00
466311 05/02/2023 Open Jeff Alford $220.75
466312 05/02/2023 Open Jorge Magana $277.50
466313 05/02/2023 Open Kimbley Craig $576.77
466314 05/02/2023 Open Sophia Rome $318.52
466315 05/02/2023 Open South Bay Regional Public Safety $417.00 466316 05/02/2023 Open Ace Hardware $70.87
466317 05/02/2023 Open Acme Car Wash (William Pierce Inc) $450.00 466318 05/02/2023 Open Alco Water $7,722.28
466319 05/02/2023 Open Alexander Vallejo $275.00
466320 05/02/2023 Open Amazon.Com $56.78
466321 05/02/2023 Open American Supply Company $741.59
466322 05/02/2023 Open Ana Rueda De Vidales dba JAV Language Solutions $253.11 466323 05/02/2023 Open Andrew McLaughlin $100.00
466324 05/02/2023 Open Assured Aggregates Company Inc $1,782.50 466325 05/02/2023 Open B&N Motors, LLC dba Toyota Salinas $38,862.86 466326 05/02/2023 Open BFS Landscape Architects $37,145.18 466327 05/02/2023 Open Brent DeBorde $88.75
466328 05/02/2023 Open Bruce Bush $100.00
466329 05/02/2023 Open C & S Engineers, Inc. $22,000.00 466330 05/02/2023 Open California Water Environment Association $402.00 466331 05/02/2023 Open California Water Service $669.07 466332 05/02/2023 Open Canon Financial Services Inc $659.18 466333 05/02/2023 Open Carollo Engineers, Inc $41,998.46 466334 05/02/2023 Open Cassie McSorley $100.00
466335 05/02/2023 Open CDW-G $4,528.42
466336 05/02/2023 Open Central Coast Center For Independent $61,859.30 466337 05/02/2023 Open Central Coast Commercial Tire Center Inc $130.00 466338 05/02/2023 Open Chris Swinscoe $100.00
466339 05/02/2023 Open Cintas $46.79
466340 05/02/2023 Open ClientFirst Consulting Group, LLC dba ClientFirst $2,566.25 466341 05/02/2023 Open Coast Automotive Warehouse Inc $88.43 466342 05/02/2023 Open Community Homeless Solutions $32,286.80 466343 05/02/2023 Open Community Human Services Project $19,347.03 466344 05/02/2023 Open Cook's Photography, Inc. $380.19 466345 05/02/2023 Open CSC Of Salinas $158.64
466346 05/02/2023 Open Dale Fors $4,704.00
466347 05/02/2023 Open Dana Cornelison $100.00
466348 05/02/2023 Open Daniel David Green $100.00
466349 05/02/2023 Open Dave Shaw $100.00
466350 05/02/2023 Open David L Crabill $100.00
466351 05/02/2023 Open David Poulin $100.00
466352 05/02/2023 Open David Werner $307.00
466353 05/02/2023 Open Division Of The State Architect $728.00 466354 05/02/2023 Open Don Chapin Inc $510.00
466355 05/02/2023 Open Downtown Streets, Inc $87,494.45 466356 05/02/2023 Open DP Trading dba The Pin Center $2,555.00 466357 05/02/2023 Open Dudek $4,510.00
466358 05/02/2023 Open E2 Consulting Engineers, Inc $100,978.30 General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/26/2023 - To Payment Date: 5/9/2023 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 1 of 7 Wednesday, May 10, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name Transaction Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/26/2023 - To Payment Date: 5/9/2023 466359 05/02/2023 Open Emergency Vehicle Specialists, Inc. $285.00 466360 05/02/2023 Open Environmental Systems, Inc of Northern California $8,579.00 466361 05/02/2023 Open Ernesto Sanchez $100.00
466362 05/02/2023 Open FAST Services $250.00
466363 05/02/2023 Open Fastenal Company $2,523.67
466364 05/02/2023 Open Ferguson US Hodings, Inc dba Ferguson Enterprises $719.95 466365 05/02/2023 Open First Alarm Wellness A Family Counseling Corporati $1,475.00 466366 05/02/2023 Open FS.Com Inc. $2,345.82
466367 05/02/2023 Open Gabriel Hernandez $100.00
466368 05/02/2023 Open Goldfarb and Lipman $63.00
466369 05/02/2023 Open Granite Construction Company $27,588.01 466370 05/02/2023 Open Granite Rock Co $1,101.06
466371 05/02/2023 Open Harris and Associates $8,307.50
466372 05/02/2023 Open Heath Johnson $100.00
466373 05/02/2023 Open Henry Gomez $100.00
466374 05/02/2023 Open Hilda Garcia $1,000.00
466375 05/02/2023 Open Hilda Garcia Petty Cash Custodian $92.67 466376 05/02/2023 Open Home Depot Credit Services $116.06 466377 05/02/2023 Open Interstate Battery System Inc $277.26 466378 05/02/2023 Open Jacqueline Pacelli $100.00
466379 05/02/2023 Open James Knowlton $100.00
466380 05/02/2023 Open Jeff Gibson $100.00
466381 05/02/2023 Open Jensco Inc Dba J M Electric $10,477.25 466382 05/02/2023 Open Jesse Pinon $100.00
466383 05/02/2023 Open Jimenez Autobody Parts, Inc dba C & J Auto Parts $350.35 466384 05/02/2023 Open John Wider $100.00
466385 05/02/2023 Open Johnson Associates $21.74
466386 05/02/2023 Open Jonathan Barnes $100.00
466387 05/02/2023 Open Jose Luis Corral dba Salinas Pizza $893.84 466388 05/02/2023 Open JT Hose & Fittings $144.85
466389 05/02/2023 Open Juan Reyes Davila dba Reyes Jumpers $599.50 466390 05/02/2023 Open Kelly-Moore Paint Company $17.81 466391 05/02/2023 Open Kevin Skinner $100.00
466392 05/02/2023 Open Kimley Horn And Assoc Inc $4,040.51 466393 05/02/2023 Open Kosmont & Associates, Inc. dba Kosmont Companies $1,014.00 466394 05/02/2023 Open Kysmet Security & Patrol $2,156.00 466395 05/02/2023 Open Lance Miraco $100.00
466396 05/02/2023 Open Mackay Motor Parts, Inc dba Napa Auto Parts $22.28 466397 05/02/2023 Open Mark Freedman $100.00
466398 05/02/2023 Open Martin Persijn $100.00
466399 05/02/2023 Open Meals On Wheels of the Salinas Valley, Inc $250.00 466400 05/02/2023 Open Michael Groves $100.00
466401 05/02/2023 Open MIS CORP $1,200.00
466402 05/02/2023 Open Monterey County Recorders $60.00 466403 05/02/2023 Open Monterey Salinas Transit $1,000.00 466404 05/02/2023 Open National Development Council $5,833.33 466405 05/02/2023 Open NHA Advisors, LLC $15,131.25
466406 05/02/2023 Open North American Catholic Educational Programming Fo $2,912.00 466407 05/02/2023 Open O'Reilly Auto Parts $381.28
466408 05/02/2023 Open Office Depot Business Service Division $1,559.15 466409 05/02/2023 Open One Workplace L Ferrari, LLC dba Peninsula Busines $2,451.51 466410 05/02/2023 Open Pacific Coast Flag $826.02
466411 05/02/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $340.31 466412 05/02/2023 Open Pacific Truck Parts Inc $1,026.81 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 2 of 7 Wednesday, May 10, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name Transaction Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/26/2023 - To Payment Date: 5/9/2023 466413 05/02/2023 Open Pinnacle Medical Group Inc dba Pinnacle Healthcare $1,028.00 466414 05/02/2023 Open Preferred Alliance Inc. $65.00
466415 05/02/2023 Open Protel Communications, Inc dba Protelesis Corporat $147.27 466416 05/02/2023 Open Quality Water Enterprises $214.68 466417 05/02/2023 Open Radio Bilingue, Inc $475.00
466418 05/02/2023 Open Rancho Cielo Youth Center $12,563.59 466419 05/02/2023 Open RDO Equipment Company $604.15
466420 05/02/2023 Open Republic Services of Salinas $1,604.16 466421 05/02/2023 Open Richard Maldonado $100.00
466422 05/02/2023 Open Ricky Williams $100.00
466423 05/02/2023 Open Rincon Consultants, Inc. $4,314.50 466424 05/02/2023 Open Rosenbauer Aerials LLC $291.06
466425 05/02/2023 Open S and S Worldwide $571.06
466426 05/02/2023 Open Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. $285.00 466427 05/02/2023 Open Safeway Sign Company $605.25
466428 05/02/2023 Open Same Day Shred $22.50
466429 05/02/2023 Open Samsara Inc. $4,345.97
466430 05/02/2023 Open San Lorenzo Lumber $360.25
466431 05/02/2023 Open Scott Myhre $100.00
466432 05/02/2023 Open Scott Tyler $100.00
466433 05/02/2023 Open Shaw HR Consulting Inc $475.00
466434 05/02/2023 Open Sheldon Bryan $100.00
466435 05/02/2023 Open Silver and Wright LLP $1,389.90
466436 05/02/2023 Open Simon Jimenez $100.00
466437 05/02/2023 Open Smith and Enright Landscaping $56,177.83 466438 05/02/2023 Open Stanley Cooper $100.00
466439 05/02/2023 Open Star Sanitation Services $116.64 466440 05/02/2023 Open Sturdy Oil Company $124.47
466441 05/02/2023 Open Suthided Livingston $100.00
466442 05/02/2023 Open Suzanne Cottle-Gavalla $100.00
466443 05/02/2023 Open T-Mobile USA $39.65
466444 05/02/2023 Open Target Pest Control $305.00
466445 05/02/2023 Open Ted Koch $100.00
466446 05/02/2023 Open Terminix International LP $8,007.00 466447 05/02/2023 Open Terry Gerhardstein $100.00
466448 05/02/2023 Open Todd Swinscoe $100.00
466449 05/02/2023 Open Tri County Fire Protection $341.05 466450 05/02/2023 Open U.S. Bank National Association ND $13,540.43 466451 05/02/2023 Open United Parcel Service $83.76
466452 05/02/2023 Open University Corporation at Monterey Bay $109,224.39 466453 05/02/2023 Open Vals Plumbing and Heating Inc $1,568.78 466454 05/02/2023 Open Vegetable Growers Supply Company $39.27 466455 05/02/2023 Open Veritiv Operating Company Formerly xpedx $854.90 466456 05/02/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $1,188.29
466457 05/02/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $2,785.74
466458 05/02/2023 Open W W Grainger Inc $1,458.52
466459 05/02/2023 Open W&M Marketing Group Inc dba B-Impressed Branding $607.19 466460 05/02/2023 Open Wallace Group A California Corporation $25,161.10 466461 05/02/2023 Open Zoom Video Communications, Inc $2,938.74 466462 05/02/2023 Open Angelia Montes $2,229.25
466463 05/02/2023 Open Rene Bravo $357.28
466464 05/02/2023 Open The Hertz Corporation $9,560.44
466465 05/05/2023 Open U.S. Bancorp Asset Management Inc dba PFM Asset $3,276.69 466466 05/09/2023 Open Alejandro Limon $215.00
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 3 of 7 Wednesday, May 10, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name Transaction Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/26/2023 - To Payment Date: 5/9/2023 466467 05/09/2023 Open Angeline Sickler $142.41
466468 05/09/2023 Open Cary Lesch $215.00
466469 05/09/2023 Open Cathy Andrews $579.34
466470 05/09/2023 Open Christopher Knapp $96.00
466471 05/09/2023 Open Collin Mitchell $96.00
466472 05/09/2023 Open David Furey $96.00
466473 05/09/2023 Open Elizabeth Pacheco $579.34
466474 05/09/2023 Open Estefania Vargas $252.27
466475 05/09/2023 Open Jaskiart Bhardwaj $187.25
466476 05/09/2023 Open Jason Thomas $596.34
466477 05/09/2023 Open Jimmy Vanhove dba Precision K9 $5,000.00 466478 05/09/2023 Open Joseph Rodgers $596.34
466479 05/09/2023 Open Joyce Burnett $128.00
466480 05/09/2023 Open Katherine Black $596.34
466481 05/09/2023 Open Kristen Parker $148.57
466482 05/09/2023 Open Margarita Medina-Romero $579.34
466483 05/09/2023 Open Martin Flores $215.00
466484 05/09/2023 Open Matthew Evarts $215.00
466485 05/09/2023 Open Melissa Guilfoyle $148.57
466486 05/09/2023 Open Rachel Safa $710.83
466487 05/09/2023 Open Robert Marques $96.00
466488 05/09/2023 Open Roberto Filice $81.00
466489 05/09/2023 Open Ryan Alexander $96.00
466490 05/09/2023 Open Sam Klemek $132.00
466491 05/09/2023 Open Skylar Thornton $215.00
466492 05/09/2023 Open Susanne Crichton $579.34
466493 05/09/2023 Open 2NDNATURE, LLC $106,584.40
466494 05/09/2023 Open 4 Imprint $684.30
466495 05/09/2023 Open Alco Water $40.13
466496 05/09/2023 Open Alhambra and Sierra Spring DS Waters of America LP $752.37 466497 05/09/2023 Open Allstar Fire Equipment Inc $2,034.71 466498 05/09/2023 Open Amazon.Com $8,756.87
466499 05/09/2023 Open American Supply Company $12,148.26 466500 05/09/2023 Open Ashley T. Martinez dba California Public Relations $3,550.00 466501 05/09/2023 Open Assured Aggregates Company Inc $2,070.25 466502 05/09/2023 Open AT and T $333.71
466503 05/09/2023 Open AT and T $8,480.91
466504 05/09/2023 Open AT&T Mobility $250.00
466505 05/09/2023 Open Badge Frame, Inc. $1,003.91
466506 05/09/2023 Open Bandit Systems Inc dba Bandit Systems $1,301.48 466507 05/09/2023 Open Bay Area Community Services Inc. $229,563.94 466508 05/09/2023 Open Benitez Security Services, Inc $54,807.00 466509 05/09/2023 Open Bergkamp Incorporated $180.29
466510 05/09/2023 Open BFS Landscape Architects $7,740.00 466511 05/09/2023 Open ByWater Solutions, LLC $7,600.00 466512 05/09/2023 Open Cadence Team, Inc $24,373.13
466513 05/09/2023 Open California Association For Property and Evidence $50.00 466514 05/09/2023 Open California Association For Property and Evidence $50.00 466515 05/09/2023 Open California Association For Property and Evidence $50.00 466516 05/09/2023 Open California Association For Property and Evidence $50.00 466517 05/09/2023 Open California Association For Property and Evidence $50.00 466518 05/09/2023 Open California Building Standards Commission $669.28 466519 05/09/2023 Open California Law Enforcement Assoc of Records Superv $150.00 466520 05/09/2023 Open California Law Enforcement Assoc of Records Superv $75.00 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 4 of 7 Wednesday, May 10, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name Transaction Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/26/2023 - To Payment Date: 5/9/2023 466521 05/09/2023 Open California Towing and Transport $15,478.00 466522 05/09/2023 Open California Water Service $1,775.21 466523 05/09/2023 Open CDW-G $3,023.74
466524 05/09/2023 Open Central Coast Federal Credit Union $6,998.60 466525 05/09/2023 Open Cintas $779.03
466526 05/09/2023 Open Coast Automotive Warehouse Inc $60.81 466527 05/09/2023 Open Comcast (Business) $572.32
466528 05/09/2023 Open Comcast (Business) $582.32
466529 05/09/2023 Open Comcast (Business) $54.11
466530 05/09/2023 Open Commercial Truck Company $357.70 466531 05/09/2023 Open Community Homeless Solutions $17,100.62 466532 05/09/2023 Open Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. $151.84 466533 05/09/2023 Open County of Monterey Information Technology Dept $35,038.36 466534 05/09/2023 Open CSC Of Salinas $195.75
466535 05/09/2023 Open CSG Consultants $10,328.00
466536 05/09/2023 Open Daniel Aledo $375.00
466537 05/09/2023 Open Daniele Brothers Inc dba Dales Glass Shop $148.93 466538 05/09/2023 Open Discount School Supply $401.89
466539 05/09/2023 Open Don Chapin Inc $2,115.70
466540 05/09/2023 Open Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. $32,401.54 466541 05/09/2023 Open Emergency Response Training Inc dba Defibthis Emer $230.00 466542 05/09/2023 Open Ergotech Controls, Inc dba Industrial Networking $213.00 466543 05/09/2023 Open Ermelinda Reyes $712.98
466544 05/09/2023 Open Fastenal Company $2,614.28
466545 05/09/2023 Open Ferguson US Hodings, Inc dba Ferguson Enterprises $432.42 466546 05/09/2023 Open First Alarm $229.92
466547 05/09/2023 Open First Alarm Security & Patrol Inc dba An Allied Un $1,466.00 466548 05/09/2023 Open First American Title Company $2,959.81 466549 05/09/2023 Open Full Source, LLC $303.10
466550 05/09/2023 Open G2Solutions, Inc $6.75
466551 05/09/2023 Open Gleason's Salinas RV, Inc. $869.57 466552 05/09/2023 Open Golden State Truck and Trailer Repair $1,011.02 466553 05/09/2023 Open Granite Construction Company $22,985.89 466554 05/09/2023 Open Granite Rock Co $3,968.93
466555 05/09/2023 Open Green Valley Industrial Supply $31.49 466556 05/09/2023 Open HD Supply White Cap Construction Supply $1,056.84 466557 05/09/2023 Open Hemi's Landscaping and Concrete Inc $10,000.00 466558 05/09/2023 Open Holden, Whitelaw & Associates, Inc dba Pacific App $3,500.00 466559 05/09/2023 Open Home Depot Credit Services $2,841.01 466560 05/09/2023 Open Hubert Manalo $1,000.00
466561 05/09/2023 Open Industrial Machine Shop $500.00
466562 05/09/2023 Open Ingram Book Company $1,690.62
466563 05/09/2023 Open International Association for Property and Evidenc $65.00 466564 05/09/2023 Open Interstate Battery System Inc $283.16 466565 05/09/2023 Open Jacqueline Vasquez $1,000.00
466566 05/09/2023 Open Jamar Technologies $695.20
466567 05/09/2023 Open Jan Roehl Dba Jan Roehl Consulting $4,250.00 466568 05/09/2023 Open Jayson F. Cardinalli dba Clean Brothers $5,022.00 466569 05/09/2023 Open Jim Pia $1,000.00
466570 05/09/2023 Open Jimmy Vanhove dba Precision K9 $17,300.00 466571 05/09/2023 Open JJR Construction Inc $10,722.63
466572 05/09/2023 Open Johnson Associates $25.56
466573 05/09/2023 Open Jose Adrian Garcia Ramos dba Shredding Source Solu $225.00 466574 05/09/2023 Open Juan Reyes Davila dba Reyes Jumpers $981.00 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 5 of 7 Wednesday, May 10, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name Transaction Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/26/2023 - To Payment Date: 5/9/2023 466575 05/09/2023 Open Karla's Janitorial & Suppliers, LLC $3,150.00 466576 05/09/2023 Open Kelly-Moore Paint Company $115.02 466577 05/09/2023 Open Kimley Horn And Assoc Inc $6,317.50 466578 05/09/2023 Open Kurt Ashley dba Secure Solutions $7,609.12 466579 05/09/2023 Open L.C. Action $2,727.01
466580 05/09/2023 Open L.N. Curtis & Sons $7,663.03
466581 05/09/2023 Open LAZ KARP Associates, LLC $34,586.31 466582 05/09/2023 Open Lexipol LLC $8,333.33
466583 05/09/2023 Open LexisNexis Risk Data Management Inc Accurint Acct $406.65 466584 05/09/2023 Open LiftOff, LLC $177.00
466585 05/09/2023 Open LPL Financial $3,444.44
466586 05/09/2023 Open Maria Avila $216.78
466587 05/09/2023 Open Matthew G Norton Co dba NWB Salinas LLC $187.00 466588 05/09/2023 Open Mike Signs $350.00
466589 05/09/2023 Open MNS Engineers, Inc $1,625.00
466590 05/09/2023 Open Monterey County Health Department $215,286.30 466591 05/09/2023 Open Monterey County Health Department $8,208.00 466592 05/09/2023 Open Monterey Sanitary Supply Inc Altius Medical $227.22 466593 05/09/2023 Open Monterey Transfer and Storage Inc $86.50 466594 05/09/2023 Open MP 21 Soledad Street, L.P. $4,191.00 466595 05/09/2023 Open MP Express $701.20
466596 05/09/2023 Open Municipal Resource Group LLC $1,687.50 466597 05/09/2023 Open My Chevrolet $476.19
466598 05/09/2023 Open My Jeep $604.17
466599 05/09/2023 Open National Emblem $6,916.16
466600 05/09/2023 Open New Image Landscape Company $100.00 466601 05/09/2023 Open Nitro Software, Inc. $16,334.28
466602 05/09/2023 Open O'Reilly Auto Parts $72.05
466603 05/09/2023 Open Office Depot Business Service Division $2,560.70 466604 05/09/2023 Open Oscar Dydasco $100.00
466605 05/09/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $2,206.69 466606 05/09/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $865.05 466607 05/09/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $598.86 466608 05/09/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $834.98 466609 05/09/2023 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $15,426.32 466610 05/09/2023 Open Pacific Products and Services LLC $558.34 466611 05/09/2023 Open Pacific Truck Parts Inc $2,417.93 466612 05/09/2023 Open PARS Retirement Services $916.54 466613 05/09/2023 Open Pedro C Estrada Dba Estrada Janitorial Service $66,835.00 466614 05/09/2023 Open Pinnacle Medical Group Inc dba Pinnacle Healthcare $5,000.00 466615 05/09/2023 Open PLM Lender Services Inc $667.50
466616 05/09/2023 Open Precision Grade Inc $20,000.00
466617 05/09/2023 Open Premier Builders, Inc. $23,899.53 466618 05/09/2023 Open Pure Water $38.75
466619 05/09/2023 Open Quality Water Enterprises $192.00 466620 05/09/2023 Open Rancho Cielo Youth Center $18,110.13 466621 05/09/2023 Open Ray Allen Manufacturing, LLC $417.71 466622 05/09/2023 Open Refrigeration Supplies Distributor $83.68 466623 05/09/2023 Open Regional Government Services $2,028.40 466624 05/09/2023 Open Rent-A-Fence.com, Inc $108.16
466625 05/09/2023 Open Republic Services, Inc dba Allied Waste Services $3,653.81 466626 05/09/2023 Open Rincon Consultants, Inc. $5,120.25 466627 05/09/2023 Open Rodolfo Guerrero Jimenez $125.00 466628 05/09/2023 Open Ross Ladder Service $6,428.50
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 6 of 7 Wednesday, May 10, 2023 Number Date Status Payee Name Transaction Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 4/26/2023 - To Payment Date: 5/9/2023 466629 05/09/2023 Open Russell Auria Pest Control Services $170.00 466630 05/09/2023 Open Ruth Maria Milla-Leon dba Andersen's Lock & Safe $34.96 466631 05/09/2023 Open S & L Investments dba Salinas Valley ProSquad $169.33 466632 05/09/2023 Open San Lorenzo Lumber $326.64
466633 05/09/2023 Open Simplot AB Retail Sub Inc $5,000.00 466634 05/09/2023 Open Smith and Enright Landscaping $260,507.11 466635 05/09/2023 Open SpeakWrite LLC $2,154.63
466636 05/09/2023 Open Stommel Inc dba Lehr $1,670.05
466637 05/09/2023 Open Sturdy Oil Company $5,337.61
466638 05/09/2023 Open Summit Uniform $3,632.34
466639 05/09/2023 Open T-Mobile USA $100.00
466640 05/09/2023 Open Target Pest Control $290.00
466641 05/09/2023 Open Tehama Golf Club LLC $800.00
466642 05/09/2023 Open The Bank Of New York Mellon $250.00 466643 05/09/2023 Open The Pun Group, LLP $30,000.00
466644 05/09/2023 Open Tiffanys Body Shop $3,086.38
466645 05/09/2023 Open TK Elevator Corporation $4,217.34 466646 05/09/2023 Open Trentman Corp. dba Interstate Sales/T-Man Traffic $4,792.71 466647 05/09/2023 Open Tri County Fire Protection $54.00 466648 05/09/2023 Open U.S. Bank National Association ND $16,394.45 466649 05/09/2023 Open United Parcel Service $51.71
466650 05/09/2023 Open University Corporation at Monterey Bay $11,371.12 466651 05/09/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $3,683.21
466652 05/09/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $38.01
466653 05/09/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $300.39
466654 05/09/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $1,436.72
466655 05/09/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $3,735.04
466656 05/09/2023 Open Verizon Wireless $6,386.53
466657 05/09/2023 Open Verizon Wireless Services LLC $50.00 466658 05/09/2023 Open W W Grainger Inc $727.90
466659 05/09/2023 Open Wallace Group A California Corporation $67,022.00 466660 05/09/2023 Open Walmart c/o Capitol One $574.99
466661 05/09/2023 Open Wayne Boyer dba Motoport USA $1,498.03 466662 05/09/2023 Open WCDJR LLC dba Watsonville Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram $3,023.98 466663 05/09/2023 Open Williams Ranch Housing Partners, LP $5,265.00 466664 05/09/2023 Open Worldpac $382.76
466665 05/09/2023 Open Harrod Construction Company $1,563.00 466666 05/09/2023 Open Harrod Construction Company $1,563.00 466667 05/09/2023 Open Mike Wahlberg c/o Lindco-Inc. $100.00 466668 05/09/2023 Open Octavio Bernardo c/o Precision Alarms $3,159.20 $2,536,613.97
General Account - General Account Totals
Type Check Totals:
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 7 of 7 Wednesday, May 10, 2023 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-267, Version: 1
Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project, CIP 9188, HSIPL-5045(035) - Final Acceptance Approve a Resolution accepting the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project (CIP 9188, HSIPL-5045(035) for maintenance and responsibility.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/10/2023
powered by Legistar™

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 16, 2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: ANDREW EASTERLING, TRAFFIC ENGINEER
TITLE: PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT, CIP
9188, HSIPL-5045(035) FINAL ACCEPTANCE
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion accepting the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project, CIP 9188, HSIPL-5045(035) for maintenance and responsibility.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On January 11, 2022, the City awarded a construction contract to Precision Grade, Inc. for the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project in the amount of $1,058,098.00. Construction began on October 11, 2022, and the contractor had 70 workings days to complete the project. The project was substantially complete on February 17, 2023, within contract time. Final punch list work was completed on March 30, 2023. Staff recommends that the City Council approve a Resolution accepting the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project (CIP 9188, HSIPL-5045(035) for maintenance and responsibility.

BACKGROUND:

On February 5, 2019, City Council accepted $250,000 in Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 9 grant funds to enhance uncontrolled crosswalks at various locations, via Council Resolution No. 21558. On June 23, 2020, City Council approved an agreement with the Transportation Agency of Monterey County (TAMC) for the use of Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), which included $90,473.60 programed towards the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project, by Council Resolution No. 21873. On August 26, 2020, the TAMC Board of Director’s awarded $545,000 in RSTP competitive grant funds to Salinas for the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project. On January 11, 2022, the City Council authorized an increase of $365,000 to CIP 9188 appropriation and use of Measure X fund balance for construction through Council Resolution No. 22286.

On August 10, 2021, City Council approved plans and specifications for the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project and authorized the issuance of invitation to bid the project, by Council Resolution No. 22161. The project was advertised on August 11, 2021, and bids were opened on September 9, 2021.

Precision Grade, Inc was the low bidder, however they did not meet the DBE goal of 12% participation. On October 18, 2021, the contractor submitted a request for a reconsideration hearing. On November 22, 2021, the City made a determination that the contractor made a good faith effort, and on December 3, 2021, the contractor submitted a revised DBE commitment rate of 9.7%. On January 11, 2022, the construction contract was awarded to Precision Grade, Inc. for the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project, CIP 9188, HSIPL-5045(035), in the amount of $1,058,098.00, with a commitment of 9.7% through Council Resolution No. 22286.

The contract established that the contractor should complete the work within 70 workings days, and construction began on October 11, 2022. During construction, 17 days were considered nonworking days due to adverse weather. No other time extensions or delays were approved. The project was deemed substantially complete on February 17, 2023, within contract time. Final punch list work was completed on March 30, 2023.

During construction several unforeseen conditions and unanticipated events occurred which changed the scope of work. A total of four contract change orders were approved for this project which totaled $6,606.79. The contract change orders increased the project cost to a total of $1,064,704.79. A summary of the change orders is listed below:

CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT
CIP 9188, HSIPL-5045(035)
No. Description Amount
1 The contractor shall eliminate all proposed work including furnishing of material, at Location 4, East Laurel Drive and Tapadero Street. Refer to Sheets 5 and 10, Revision 2.
$(50,330.00)
2 All labor, equipment, and materials required to install the new service point as shown on revised sheet 7 of this change order. Contractor shall furnish and install new conduit, couplings, boxes, conductors, and necessary materials. $ 51,963.41
3 All labor, equipment, and materials required to remobilize and set up traffic control to extend the retaining wall at Natividad and Pacheco, as directed by the City.
$4,049.38
4 Final Quantity Balancing Change Order. Contract bid item quantities shall be adjusted as shown in Attachment A the change order. $924.00 Change Order Sub-Total $6,606.79
Original Contract Amount $1,058,098.00
Final Contract Amount $1,064,704.79
Due to the Federal funding involved in this project, the application of the City’s Local Hiring requirements was not allowed. However, through fair and open competition, 83% of the project’s construction workforce, including subcontractor workforce, measured in labor work hours, was comprised of local hires. In addition, 22% of the project’s construction workforce consisted of apprentice hours.

The Federal funding involved in this project required the contractor to meet the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal of 9.7% participation, a total amount of $102,830.00. At the time of this report the Final Utilization of DBE and First Tier Subcontractors report has not been submitted by the contractor, however it is anticipated that Precision Grade, Inc will have made a total of $220,503.73 in participating DBE payments and will exceed the contract commitment.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This action supports the City Council goal of “Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability” FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There was no impact to the general fund. The project was completed within its CIP budget.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Attachment 1: Resolution Number 21558
Attachment 2: Resolution Number 21873
Attachment 3: Resolution Number 22161
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT (CIP 9188, HSIPL-5045(035)

FOR MAINTENANCE AND RESPONSIBILITY
WHEREAS, on January 11, 2022, the City awarded a construction contract to Precision Grade, Inc. for the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project in the amount of $1,058,098.00; and WHEREAS, construction began on October 11, 2022, and the contractor had 70 workings days to complete the project; and
WHEREAS, the project was substantially complete on February 17, 2023, within contract time; and
WHEREAS, final punch list work was completed on March 30, 2023; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby accepts the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project (CIP 9188, HSIPL-5045(035) for maintenance and responsibility.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 16
th day of May 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. 21558 (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT GRANT

FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE

AGREEMENTS RELATED TO THE HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT

PROGRMA GRANT
WHEREAS, on March 3, 2015, the City Council approved a resolution establishing the Salinas Crosswalk Policy;
WHEREAS, the City actively seeks funding to supplement local funds for transportation infrastructure improvements; and
WHEREAS, Caltrans announced the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 9 Call for projects and the City applied for funds for pedestrian crossing enhancements; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2018, the City received notice that the City’s Highway Safety Improvement Program grant application was awarded grant funds; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council accepts the grant award for pedestrian crossing enhancements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council authorizes the Public Works Director to execute agreements related to the highway safety improvement program grant; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council authorizes the Public Works Director to make the necessary transfers from CIP 9280 as needed for the local match (approximately $97,000).

PASSED AND APPROVED this 5
th day of February 2019 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: Barrera, Cromeenes, Davis, De La Rosa, McShane, Villegas and Mayor Gunter
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
APPROVED:
________________________
Joe Gunter, Mayor
DocuSign Envelope ID: C7EE94AA-9073-4233-859F-700D20EABA52 Page | 2
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: C7EE94AA-9073-4233-859F-700D20EABA52 Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. 21873 (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT

WITH THE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY (TAMC) FOR

THE USE OF REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
WHEREAS, TAMC administers regional transportation funds in Monterey County including funds from the Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), Transportation Development Act (TDA), Regional Development Impact Fee Program (RDIF); and WHEREAS, the City of Salinas relies on regional transportation funding for City transportation projects, including current construction projects funded by RSTP funds; and WHEREAS, each agency receiving TAMC-administered transportation funds is required to enter into a Master Agreement with TAMC in order to use said funds as required by the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the Master Agreement details State requirements for use of said transportation funds and other fiscal provisions required to comply with state and federal regulations; and
WHEREAS, the term of the Master Agreement is three years.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed for and behalf of the City of Salinas to execute the attached Master Agreement with TAMC and future updates of said agreement for the use of said TAMCadministered funds.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of June 2020 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: Barrera, Cromeenes, Davis, De La Rosa, McShane, Villegas and Mayor Gunter
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
DocuSign Envelope ID: FEAFF22E-97E3-4633-99AB-39A3FDD36A6B DocuSign Envelope lD: FEAF F 22E-97E34633-99A8-39A3FDD36A6B ATTEST:
by:

Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
APPROVED:

Fiz/ oe Gunter, Mayor
Page l2
-"n
Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. 22161 (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION TO: 1) APPROVE THE PROJECT’S PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT; CIP 9188, HSIPL5045-(035), 2) REJECT ALL BIDS RECEIVED ON JUNE 29, 2021, AND 3) AUTHORIZE

THE ISSUANCE OF INVITATION TO RE-BID THE PROJECT, WITH BIDS TO BE OPENED ON SEPTEMBER 7, 2021
WHEREAS, City staff has completed plans, and specifications for the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project; CIP 9188, HSIPL-5045-(035); and WHEREAS, City staff advertised the project for bid on June 6, 2021, with bids due on June 29, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the City received two bids from prospective bidders, and both bids contained errors; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends the City reject all bids and to re-bid the project with bids to be opened on September 7, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the project is estimated to be fully funded using grant funds, development fair share contribution funds, and gas tax; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1(c)) because the actions consist of operation and minor alteration of an existing City street.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Salinas City Council takes the following action:
1) The project’s Plans and Specifications for the Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project; CIP 9188, HSIPL-5045-(035) are hereby approved; 2) All bids received on June 29, 2021 for the project are hereby rejected; and 3) The issuance of an invitation to re-bid the project, with bids to be opened on September 7, 2021, is hereby approved.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of August 2021, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: Barrera, Cromeenes, González, Osornio, Rocha, McShane and Mayor Craig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
DocuSign Envelope ID: 806A16CD-E5A6-426F-B915-3BB722B4C0CB Page | 2
APPROVED:
_______________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: 806A16CD-E5A6-426F-B915-3BB722B4C0CB City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-276, Version: 1
2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project, CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080 Approve a Resolution approving the plans and specifications for the 2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project, CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080; awarding a contract to Granite Construction Company for the 2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project, CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080 in the amount of $8,138,006.96; and approve a transfer of $1,200,000.00 Measure X Bond Funds.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/10/2023
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 16, 2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, P.E., L.S., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: ELISE RAMIREZ, P.E., SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER

PATRICK FUNG, ASSISTANT ENGINEER
TITLE: 2022-2023 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PROJECT, CIP NO. 9981, 9120, 9080
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution:

1. Approving the plans and specifications for the 2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project, CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080; and

2. Awarding a contract to Granite Construction Company for the 2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project, CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080 in the amount of $8,138,006.96; and

3. Approve a transfer of $1,200,000.00 Measure X Bond Funds (Fund 5202) from CIP 9981 – Street Preventive Maintenance Program to CIP 9080 – San Juan Grade Road Improvements.

BACKGROUND:

On August 18, 2020, the City Council approved a contract with Pavement Engineering Inc. for ongoing pavement condition surveys, updates to the Street Saver Pavement Management Program (PMP) database, and pavement condition reports (Resolution No. 21932). The last Pavement Management System Update was presented to the City Council on March 16, 2021. Public Works staff utilizes the Street Saver PMP for project level pavement analysis. It is a budgeting and inventory tool, a record for work history, and pavement condition tracking.

The 2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project will enhance pedestrian safety and increase connectivity, mobility, and access for transit users and pedestrians. The project, in general, calls for pavement reconstruction, new ADA-compliant curb ramps, curbs, gutters, pavement patch repairs, crack treatment, chip seal, slurry seal, installation of new signs and striping. See location map Exhibit B.

Pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 30-25, the City Engineer approved the project plans and specifications and authorized the call for bids for this project.

Page | 2
The project was advertised for construction bid on March 7, 2023, and on April 7, 2023, one bid was electronically received and publicly opened and examined via Zoom meeting with the following results (see Exhibit A – Bid Tabulation sheet for details).

BID RESULTS:

Contractor Total Base Bid 1-7, Additive Alts 1-2
Granite Construction Company $8,138,006.96
Engineer’s Estimate $12,000,000.00
The bidder does not qualify for the Local Purchasing Preference. The engineering estimate for the project was $12,000,000.00 and Granite Construction Company submitted a bid of $8,136,006.96, which is approximately 68% of the engineering estimate.

The City received only a single bid that is significantly lower than the engineer’s estimate and may be attributed to reduced capacities for contract work due to local flood emergencies and repairs in the tri-county area, as well as throughout the State of California from recent storms. The engineering estimate, in general, was based on unit prices from previous projects: Downtown Complete Streets, Main Street Streetscape, 2018 Slurry Seal, 2020 Pavement Patch and Repair, and 2021 Chip Seal and escalating unit prices with respect to the trends observed in the Construction Cost Index (CCI) and published in the Engineering News Record (ENR).

Considering the factors stated above, staff recommends awarding the project to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Granite Construction Company, for their bid of $8,138,006.96.

Construction is anticipated to begin in June of 2023 and be completed by Fall 2023.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Categorically exempt. The City of Salinas has determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 1530l(c), Class 1), because the project proposes to maintain existing roadways, crosswalks, signage, and pavement striping.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exemptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Sections 15300.2, because section does not apply, and we are not reconstructing or replacing any structures or facilities.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This project relates to the Council’s Goals of Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability and Public Safety by maintaining the City’s existing roadways and installing new striping and signage to enhance vehicular and pedestrian safety.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Public Works staff and Finance staff have worked together on the funding of the 2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project.

Page | 3
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The total project funding for the project is as follows:

CIP 9080 San Juan Grade
Road Improvements Budget FY Expenditures
FY
Encumbrances
Available
Funds
Fund 2510 – MX Transport
Safety & Inv Plan $1,424,560 - - 1,424,560
Fund 5202 - Special Const.

Assist-Bonds $340,944 15,812 5,670 319,461
CIP 9080 Balance (as of 4/10/2023) $1,744,021
Base Bid 1, Add. Alt. 1-2 $2,585,341.25
CIP 9120 Monte Bella
Subdivision Improvements Budget FY Expenditures
FY
Encumbrances
Available
Funds
Fund 2109 – Monte Bella
Maintenance District $4,469,934 $92,781 7,376 4,469,934 CIP 9120 Balance (as of 4/10/2023) $4,469,934
Base Bids 4, 6 $447,729.02
CIP 9981 Street Preventive
Maintenance Program Budget FY Expenditures
FY
Encumbrances
Available
Funds
Fund 2510 – MX Transport
Safety & Inv Plan $1,230,043 31,957 185,580 1,012,506
Fund 5202 - Special Const.

Assist-Bonds $5,593,562 3,404,478 544,670 1,644,412
Fund 2511 – SB1 RMRA $7,923,000 3,079,567 - 4,843,432
CIP 9981 Balance (as of 4/10/2023) $7,500,350
Base Bids 2, 5, 7 $5,034,556.09
CIP 9329 Cesar Chavez
Library Parking Lot Budget FY Expenditures
FY
Encumbrances
Available
Funds
Fund 1100 – Measure E $75,000 - - 75,000
CIP 9329 Balance (as of 4/10/2023) $75,000
Base Bid 3 $70,380.60
Total Project Bid $8,138,006.96
To award Base Bid 1 (San Juan Grade Road) and Additive Alternatives 1 & 2 (Work Street from East Alisal Street to Work Circle), staff is requesting a transfer of $1,200,000.00 in Measure X Page | 4
Bond Funds from CIP 9981 – Street Preventive Maintenance Program to CIP 9080 – San Juan Grade Road Improvements.

Based on the lowest bid received, the estimated total project cost is $9,327,327.93, including direct construction costs and soft costs. The anticipated project costs are as follows:

ANTICIPATED PROJECT COSTS
Expenditure Description Anticipated Expenditure
Base Bids 1-7 $6,797,339.71
Additive Alternatives 1-2 $1,340,667.25
Contingency (10%) $813,800.70
Direct Project Cost Subtotal $8,951,807.66
Inspection (2%) $162,760.14
Administrative Overhead $50,000
City Staff Project Management and Admin. (2%) $162,760.14 Soft Project Cost Subtotal $375,520.28
Project Direct Costs $8,951,807.66
Project Soft Costs $294,140.21
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $9,327,327.93
Based on the tabulation above, there is adequate funding available to complete the project as bid.

ATTACHMENTS:
 Resolution
 Exhibit A – Bid Tabulation Sheet
 Exhibit B - Project Location Map
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING

BID AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT WITH GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE 2022-2023 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PROJECT, CIP 9981, 9120, 9080, AND APPROVING A TRANSFER OF $1,200,000.00 IN MEASURE X BOND FUNDS FROM CIP 9981 TO CIP 9080
WHEREAS, on August 18, 2020, the City Council approved a contract with Pavement Engineering Inc. for on-going pavement condition surveys, updates to the Street Saver Pavement Management Program (PMP) database, and pavement condition reports (Resolution No. 21932); and
WHEREAS, Public Works utilizes the Street Saver PMP as a budgeting and inventory tool and a record for pavement work history and condition; and WHEREAS, the 2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project, in general, calls for pavement reconstruction, curb ramps, curbs, gutters, pavement patch repairs, crack treatment, chip seal, slurry seal, installation of new signs and striping; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer approved the project plans and specifications and authorized the call for bids for this project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 1530l(c), Class 1) because the project proposes to maintain existing roadways, crosswalks, signage, and pavement striping, and the project does not qualify for any of the exemptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Sections 15300.2; and
WHEREAS, the project was advertise for construction bid on March 7, 2023; and WHEREAS, representatives of the City Clerk of Salinas on April 7, 2023, at a public meeting held via Zoom meeting from City Hall, at Salinas, California, publicly opened, examined, and declared all bids or proposals delivered electronically via the PlanetBids website for the 2022- 2023 Pavement Maintenance Project in accordance with the specifications for such work filed in the office of said City Clerk, and now on file in said office; and WHEREAS, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder Granite Construction Company submitted a bid that is 68% of the engineering estimate and sufficient funds are available to award Base Bids 1 to 7 and Additive Alternatives 1 and 2; and WHEREAS, to award Base Bid 1 and Additive Alternatives 1 and 2, staff is requesting a transfer of $1,200,000.00 in Measure X Bond Funds from CIP 9981 to CIP 9080; and WHEREAS, City staff thereupon reported the results of the bidding to the City Council at its regular meeting on May 16, 2023, and the Council in open session at said meeting examined the report of staff.
2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 12-21, in reference to the 2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project, CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080, that all of said bids or proposals are rejected except the bid from Granite Construction Company, (hereinafter referred to as “Successful Bidders”), being the lowest and best bid which is hereby accepted (Base Bids 1-7 and Additive Alternatives 1-2). The subject contract is hereby awarded to said Successful Bidder for the sum of $8,138,006.96, and more specifically at the unit prices particularly set forth and contained in the Proposal for the 2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project, CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080, of said successful bidders previously filed in the office of the City Clerk. Said sum shall be paid by the City of Salinas to said Successful Bidder in cash, lawful money of the United States of America, payable at the time and manner specified in the plans and specifications and contract documents for the project filed in the office of the City Clerk, entitled “2022-2023 Pavement Maintenance Project, CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080”; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said plans and specifications are hereby accepted and adopted for said work and are also referred to for all of the details and particulars thereof, and said plans and specifications are by reference incorporated in and hereby made a part of this resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves a transfer of $1,200,000.00 Measure X Bond Funds from CIP 9981 – Street Preventive Maintenance Program to CIP 9080 – San Juan Grade Road Improvements; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of Salinas is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the City of Salinas to execute a contract consistent with the Proposal of said Successful Bidder for said work.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of May 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
3 ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
BID OPENING:

Apr. 7, 2023

BID TABULATION
2022-23 Pavement Maintenance
CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080
Bid awarded on _________ by Salinas City Council by Resolution No. _______ (NCS) to: ___________________ Drawing No. 8202, 8234, 8248, 8249 for for the sum of ________________ (BaseBid No. 1 thru 7 + Additive Alternate No. 1 thru 2. Project Coordinator: Patrick Fung All other bids were rejected and bid bonds returned. Project Manager: Elise Ramirez Dated this ______ day of _________, 2023
City Clerk ENG.

ESTIMATE
ITEM DESCRIPTION APPROX. UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO. QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
BASE BID No. 1 San Juan Grade Road (CIP 9080)
1 Construction Coordination/Mobilization; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 70,000.00 70,000.00 $ 105,000.00 $ 105,000.00 2 Implement Sediment Control Plan; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 30,000.00 30,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 3 Prepare and Implement Traffic Control Plan Complete-In-Place 1 LS 66,000.00 66,000.00 $ 42,000.00 $ 42,000.00 4 Furnish and Install All Temporary Construction Area Signs, Posts, and Hardware (Including Removal at Completion of Project) Complete-In-Place 1 LS 15,000.00 15,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 5 Funish and Install Portable Changeable Message Signs (Including Removal at Completion of Project); Complete-In-Place 1 LS 40,000.00 40,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 6 Construction Surveying and Staking 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 7 Roadway Excavation (6” Minimum Depth) 149,330 SF 6.00 895,980.00 $ 0.90 $ 134,397.00 8 Remove and Dispose Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter 30 LF 25.00 750.00 $ 75.00 $ 2,250.00 9 Remove and Dispose Existing Concrete Sidewalk 265 SF 15.00 3,975.00 $ 60.00 $ 15,900.00 10 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) 5,665 TON 170.00 963,050.00 $ 154.00 $ 872,410.00 11 Furnish and Install ADA-Compliant Pedestrian Ramp with Detectable Warning Surface; Complete-In-Place 4 EA 10,000.00 40,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 15,200.00 12 Construct Concrete Type “C” Curb and Gutter; Complete-In-Place 30 LF 50.00 1,500.00 $ 95.00 $ 2,850.00 13 Construct Concrete Sidewalk; Complete-In- Place 186 SF 30.00 5,580.00 $ 22.00 $ 4,092.00 14 Adjust Existing City Monument to Finish Grade; Complete-In-Place 3 EA 550.00 1,650.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 5,400.00 15 Adjust Existing City Sanitary Sewer Manhole to Finish Grade; Complete-In-Place 5 EA 1,000.00 5,000.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 14,000.00 16 Furnish and Install "Type BB” Fire Hydrant Pavement Marker; Complete-In-Place 5 EA 20.00 100.00 $ 35.00 $ 175.00 17 Furnish and Install new vehicle detector loops and advance warning vehicle detector loops 10 EA 1,000.00 10,000.00 $ 800.00 $ 8,000.00 TOTAL BASE BID No. 1 (ITEMS 1 - 17) $ 2,158,585.00 $ 1,244,674.00 ADDITIVE ALTERNATIVE No. 1 (WORK STREET: ALISAL ST TO JOHN ST, CIP 9080) 18 Construction Coordination/Mobilization; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 15,000.00 15,000.00 $ 56,000.00 $ 56,000.00 19 Implement Sediment Control Plan; Complete- In-Place 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 20 Prepare and Implement Traffic Control Plan Complete-In-Place 1 LS 8,000.00 8,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 21 Furnish and Install All Temporary Construction Area Signs, Posts, and Hardware (Including Removal at Completion of Project) Complete- In-Place 1 LS 7,500.00 7,500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 22 Funish and Install Portable Changeable Message Signs (Including Removal at Completion of Project); Complete-In-Place 1 LS 12,500.00 12,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 23 Construction Surveying and Staking 1 LS 6,000.00 6,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 24 Roadway Excavation (6” Minimum Depth) 54,965 SF 6.00 329,790.00 $ 0.95 $ 52,216.75 25 Remove and Dispose Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter 185 LF 25.00 4,625.00 $ 35.00 $ 6,475.00 26 Remove and Dispose Existing Pedestrian Access Ramps 399 SF 20.00 7,980.00 $ 18.00 $ 7,182.00 27 Remove and Dispose Existing Concrete Sidewalk 1,720 SF 15.00 25,800.00 $ 8.00 $ 13,760.00 28 Remove and Dispose Existing Tree, Grind Tree Stump to 36” Below Grade; Complete-InPlace 8 EA 2,000.00 16,000.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 19,200.00 29 Construct Concrete Sidewalk; Complete-In- Place 1,660 SF 30.00 49,800.00 $ 15.00 $ 24,900.00 30 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) 2,064 TON 170.00 350,880.00 $ 155.00 $ 319,920.00 31 Furnish and Install ADA-Compliant Pedestrian Ramp with Detectable Warning Surface; Complete-In-Place 4 EA 10,000.00 40,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 20,000.00 32 Construct Concrete Type “C” Curb and Gutter; Complete-In-Place 185 LF 50.00 9,250.00 $ 80.00 $ 14,800.00 33 Furnish and Install Stormwater Catch Basin Inlet Filter 3 EA 2,025.00 6,075.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 5,400.00 34 Furnish and Install Thermoplastic Striping, Pavement Markings, and Raised Pavement Markers; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 11,391.00 11,391.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 57,000.00 35 Furnish and Install "Type BB” Fire Hydrant Pavement Marker; Complete-In-Place 1 EA 20.00 20.00 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 36 Furnish and Install Vehicle Detector Loop 4 EA 1,000.00 4,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 8,000.00 TOTAL Add Alternate No. 1 (ITEMS 18 - 36) $ 909,611.00 $ 666,888.75 ADDITIVE ALTERNATIVE No. 2 (JOHN TO WORK CIRCLE, CIP 9080) 37 Construction Coordination/Mobilization; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 38 Implement Sediment Control Plan; Complete- In-Place 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 39 Prepare and Implement Traffic Control Plan Complete-In-Place 1 LS 8,000.00 8,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 40 Funish and Install Portable Changeable Message Signs (Including Removal at Completion of Project); Complete-In-Place 1 LS 12,500.00 12,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 41 Furnish and Install All Temporary Construction Area Signs, Posts, and Hardware (Including Removal at Completion of Project) Complete- In-Place 1 LS 7,500.00 7,500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 42 Construction Surveying and Staking 1 LS 6,000.00 6,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 43 Roadway Excavation (6” Minimum Depth) 64,665 SF 6.00 387,990.00 $ 0.90 $ 58,198.50 44 Remove and Dispose Existing Pedestrian Access Ramps 445 SF 20.00 8,900.00 $ 28.00 $ 12,460.00 45 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) 2,425 TON 170.00 412,250.00 $ 150.00 $ 363,750.00 46 Furnish and Install ADA-Compliant Pedestrian Ramp with Detectable Warning Surface; Complete-In-Place 5 EA 10,000.00 50,000.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 26,000.00 47 Furnish and Install Stormwater Catch Basin Inlet Filter 5 EA 2,025.00 10,125.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 9,000.00 48 Furnish and Install Thermoplastic Striping, Pavement Markings, and Raised Pavement Markers; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 12,050.00 12,050.00 $ 41,000.00 $ 41,000.00 49 Adjust Existing City Monument to Finish Grade; Complete-In-Place 3 EA 550.00 1,650.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 5,100.00 50 Adjust Existing City Sanitary Sewer Manhole to Finish Grade; Complete-In-Place 6 EA 1,000.00 6,000.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 19,200.00 51 Adjust Existing Valve Covers to Finish Grade; Complete-In-Place 8 EA 550.00 4,400.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 14,400.00 52 Furnish and Install "Type BB” Fire Hydrant Pavement Marker; Complete-In-Place 2 EA 20.00 40.00 $ 35.00 $ 70.00 53 Furnish and Install new vehicle detector loops and advance warning vehicle detector loops 3 EA 1,000.00 3,000.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 8,100.00 Total Additive Alternative No. 2 (Items 37-53) (For Comparison Only) $ 945,405.00 $ 673,778.50 ADDITIVE ALTERNATIVE No. 3 (SAN JUAN GRADE ROAD SIDEWALK, CIP 9080) 54 REMOVED Construct Concrete Sidewalk; Complete- In-Place 0 SF 0.00 0.00 $ - $ - 55 REMOVED Furnish and Install Additional Temporary Construction Area Signs, Posts, and Hardware (Including Removal at Completion of Project), and Prepare and Implement Additional Traffic Control Plan as needed; Complete-In-Place
0 LS 0.00 0.00 $ - $ -
56 REMOVED Implement Additional Sediment Control Plan; Complete-In-Place 0 LS 0.00 0.00 $ - $ - Total Additive Alternative No. 3 (Items 54-56) (For Comparison Only) $ - $ - Granite Construction Company
580 West Beach Street
Watsonville Ca. 95076
CONTRACTOR #1
4/11/2023 J:\p\9981.9120.9080\9981_Chip Seal_2022\PlanetBID\BID Operations\BID Opening\BID_tab\2022-23_Multi_CIP9981.9120.9080_Pavement Maintenance Page 1 of 3

EXHIBIT A
BID OPENING:

Apr. 7, 2023

BID TABULATION
2022-23 Pavement Maintenance
CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080
ENG.

ESTIMATE
ITEM DESCRIPTION APPROX. UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO. QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
Granite Construction Company
580 West Beach Street
Watsonville Ca. 95076
CONTRACTOR #1
BASE BID 2 SLURRY SEAL (CIP 9981 – VARIOUS STREETS)
57 Construction Coordination/Mobilization; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 40,000.00 40,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 58 Implement Sediment Control Plan; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 25,000.00 25,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 65,000.00 59 Prepare and Implement Traffic Control Plan Complete-In- Place 1 LS 60,000.00 60,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 90,000.00 60 Furnish and Install All Temporary Construction Area Signs, Posts, and Hardware (Including Removal at Completion of Project) Complete-In-Place 1 LS 40,000.00 40,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 65,000.00 61 Pavement Digout and Repair; Complete-In-Place 20,000 SF 35.00 700,000.00 $ 13.00 $ 260,000.00 62 Crack Treatment; Complete-In- Place 33 LLM 5,000.00 165,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 125,400.00 63 Furnish and Install Type II Slurry Seal; Complete-In-Place 226,077 SY 3.50 791,269.50 $ 2.37 $ 535,802.49 64 Remove and Dispose of all Existing Striping, Markings, Channelizers, and Raised Pavement Markers; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 33,000.00 33,000.00 $ 97,000.00 $ 97,000.00 65 Furnish and Install: Thermoplastic Stripes; Pavement Markings; Channelizers; and Raised Pavement Markers (RPM); Complete-In-Place 1 LS 330,000.00 330,000.00 $ 483,000.00 $ 483,000.00 66 Furnish and Install "Type BB” Fire Hydrant Pavement Marker; Complete-In-Place 193 EA 20.00 3,860.00 $ 35.00 $ 6,755.00 Total Base Bid 2 (Items 57-66) (For Comparison Only) $ 2,188,129.50 $ 1,802,957.49 BASE BID 3 SLURRY SEAL (CIP 9981 – CESAR CHAVEZ PARKING LOT):
67 Construction Coordination/Mobilization; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 68 Implement Sediment Control Plan; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 69 Prepare and Implement Traffic Control Plan Complete-In- Place 1 LS 1,000.00 1,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 70 Furnish and Install All Temporary Construction Area Signs, Posts, and Hardware (Including Removal at Completion of Project) Complete-In-Place 1 LS 1,000.00 1,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 71 Pavement Digout and Repair; Complete-In-Place 2,215 SF 35.00 77,525.00 $ 14.00 $ 31,010.00 72 Crack Treatment; Complete-In- Place 1 LLM 5,000.00 5,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 73 Furnish and Install Type II Slurry Seal; Complete-In-Place 2,422 SY 3.50 8,477.00 $ 2.30 $ 5,570.60 74 Furnish and Install Thermoplastic Striping; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 $ 20,500.00 $ 20,500.00 Total Base Bid 3 (Items 67-74) (For Comparison Only) $ 113,002.00 $ 70,380.60 BASE BID 4 SLURRY SEAL (CIP 9120 – MONTE BELLA)
75 Construction Coordination/Mobilization; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 20,000.00 20,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 76 Implement Sediment Control Plan; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 77 Prepare and Implement Traffic Control Plan Complete-In-Place 1 LS 17,000.00 17,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 78 Furnish and Install All Temporary Construction Area Signs, Posts, and Hardware (Including Removal at Completion of Project) Complete-In-Place 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 79 Crack Treatment; Complete-In- Place 13 LLM 5,000.00 65,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 49,400.00 80 Furnish and Install Type II Slurry Seal; Complete-In-Place 93,302 SY 3.50 326,557.00 $ 2.26 $ 210,862.52 81 Remove and Dispose of all Existing Striping, Markings, Channelizers, and Raised Pavement Markers; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 7,615.90 7,615.90 $ 5,750.00 $ 5,750.00 82 Furnish and Install Thermoplastic Striping, Pavement Markings, and Raised Pavement Markers; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 76,159.00 76,159.00 $ 33,750.00 $ 33,750.00 83 Furnish and Install "Type BB” Fire Hydrant Pavement Marker; Complete-In-Place 69 EA 20.00 1,380.00 $ 35.00 $ 2,415.00 Total Base Bid 4 (Items 75-83) (For Comparison Only) $ 528,711.90 $ 402,177.52 BASE BID 5 CHIP SEAL (CIP 9981 – VARIOUS STREETS):
84 Construction Coordination/Mobilization; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 140,000.00 140,000.00 $ 110,000.00 $ 110,000.00 85 Implement Sediment Control Plan; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 75,000.00 75,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 86 Prepare and Implement Traffic Control Plan Complete-In- Place 1 LS 418,000.00 418,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 87 Furnish and Install All Temporary Construction Area Signs, Posts, and Hardware (Including Removal at Completion of Project) Complete-In-Place 1 LS 15,000.00 15,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 14,000.00 88 Funish and Install Portable Changeable Message Signs (Including Removal at Completion of Project); Complete-In-Place 1 LS 40,000.00 40,000.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 89 Pavement Digout and Repair; Complete-In-Place 15,427 SF 35.00 539,945.00 $ 17.00 $ 262,259.00 90 Crack Treatment; Complete-In- Place 25 LLM 5,000.00 125,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 95,000.00 91 Furnish and Install Chip Seal; Complete-In-Place 265,244 SY 6.00 1,591,464.00 $ 2.55 $ 676,372.20 92 REMOVED Furnish and Install Surface Seal; Complete-In-Place 0 N/A 0.00 0.00 $ - $ - 93 Remove and Dispose of all Existing Striping, Markings, Channelizers, and Raised Pavement Markers; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 82,621.10 82,621.10 $ 116,000.00 $ 116,000.00 94 Furnish and Install Thermoplastic Striping, Pavement Markings, and Raised Pavement Markers; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 826,211.00 826,211.00 $ 517,000.00 $ 517,000.00 95 Furnish and Install "Type BB” Fire Hydrant Pavement Marker; Complete-In-Place 71 EA 20.00 1,420.00 $ 35.00 $ 2,485.00 96 Furnish and Install Pre-Formed Thermoplastic Marking (In- Lane Double Rumble Bar, Includes Removal of Existing Thermoplastic Rumble Bars); Complete-In-Place 1 LS 80,000.00 80,000.00 $ 144,000.00 $ 144,000.00 97 Remove And Dispose of Existing Post/Salvage Sign; Complete-In-Place 1 EA 200.00 200.00 $ 85.00 $ 85.00 98 Remove and Salvage Existing Sign; Complete-In-Place 100 EA 150.00 15,000.00 $ 65.00 $ 6,500.00 99 Furnish and Install Sign and Post; Complete-In-Place 26 EA 500.00 13,000.00 $ 495.00 $ 12,870.00 100 Furnish and Install Sign onto Existing Pole/Post; Complete- In-Place 116 EA 300.00 34,800.00 $ 325.00 $ 37,700.00 101 Furnish and Install Type I Barricade with R9-3A; Complete-In-Place 2 EA 1,500.00 3,000.00 $ 1,025.00 $ 2,050.00 102 Remove and Replace Existing Double-Sided Surface Mounted In-Street Post and Sign; Complete-In-Place 2 EA 350.00 700.00 $ 245.00 $ 490.00
103 Remove and Replace Existing Overhead Sign; Complete-In- Place 2 EA 1,000.00 2,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 Total Base Bid 5 (Items 84-103) (For Comparison Only) $ 4,003,361.10 $ 2,107,311.20 BASE BID 6 CHIP SEAL (CIP 9120 – MONTE BELLA):
104 Furnish and Install Chip Seal; Complete-In- Place 3,330 SY 6.00 19,980.00 $ 2.55 $ 8,491.50 105 REMOVED Furnish and Install Surface Seal; Complete-In-Place 0 N/A 0.00 0.00 $ - $ - 106 Furnish and Install: Thermoplastic Stripes; Pavement Markings; Channelizers; and Raised Pavement Markers (RPM); Complete- In-Place 1 LS 8,800.00 8,800.00 $ 36,000.00 $ 36,000.00 107 Remove and Salvage Existing Sign; Complete-In-Place 1 EA 150.00 150.00 $ 85.00 $ 85.00 108 Furnish and Install Sign onto Existing Pole/Post; 3 EA 300.00 900.00 $ 325.00 $ 975.00 Total Base Bid 6 (Items 103-108) (For Comparison Only) $ 29,830.00 $ 45,551.50 4/11/2023 J:\p\9981.9120.9080\9981_Chip Seal_2022\PlanetBID\BID Operations\BID Opening\BID_tab\2022-23_Multi_CIP9981.9120.9080_Pavement Maintenance Page 2 of 3

EXHIBIT A
BID OPENING:

Apr. 7, 2023

BID TABULATION
2022-23 Pavement Maintenance
CIP No. 9981, 9120, 9080
ENG.

ESTIMATE
ITEM DESCRIPTION APPROX. UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO. QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
Granite Construction Company
580 West Beach Street
Watsonville Ca. 95076
CONTRACTOR #1
BASE BID 7: BORONDA ROAD: (N MAIN ST TO SAN JUAN GRADE RD, CIP 9981) 109 Construction Coordination/Mobilization; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 18,000.00 18,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 85,000.00 110 Implement Sediment Control Plan; Complete- In-Place 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 111 Prepare and Implement Traffic Control Plan Complete-In-Place 1 LS 15,000.00 15,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 112 Furnish and Install All Temporary Construction Area Signs, Posts, and Hardware (Including Removal at Completion of Project) Complete- In-Place 1 LS 12,500.00 12,500.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 113 Construction Surveying and Staking 1 LS 3,000.00 3,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 114 Roadway Excavation (6” Minimum Depth) 141,192 SF 6.00 847,152.00 $ 0.95 $ 134,132.40 115 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) 5,595 TON 170.00 951,150.00 $ 130.00 $ 727,350.00 116 Furnish and Install Thermoplastic Striping, Pavement Markings, and Raised Pavement Markers; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 24,000.00 24,000.00 $ 106,000.00 $ 106,000.00 117 Adjust Existing City Manholes to Finish Grade; Complete-In-Place 8 EA 5,000.00 40,000.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 19,200.00 118 Furnish and Install "Type BB” Fire Hydrant Pavement Marker; Complete-In-Place 2 EA 20.00 40.00 $ 35.00 $ 70.00 119 Furnish and Install Sign and Post; Complete-In- Place 3 EA 500.00 1,500.00 $ 495.00 $ 1,485.00 120 Furnish and Install Type I Barricade with Sign; Complete-In-Place 2 EA 1,000.00 2,000.00 $ 1,025.00 $ 2,050.00 Total Base Bid 7 (Items 109-120) (For Comparison Only) $ 1,924,342.00 $ 1,124,287.40 12,800,977.50
GRAND TOTAL (BASE BIDS 1-7 + ADDITIVE ALTERNATIVES 1-2) (FOR COMPARISON ONLY)

ITEMS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PROPOSAL ON BID OPENING DATE 1 Proposal
2 Addendum No. 1
3 Addendum No. 2
4 Addendum No. 3
5 Bid Bond
6 Bidder’s Statement of Financial Responsibility Technical Ability and Experience 7 Insurance Certification
8 Non-Collusion Declaration Of Contractor
9 Bidder's Statement Of Subcontractors Part I
ITEMS TO BE SUBMITTED BY LOW BIDDER AND SECOND LOWEST BIDDDER ON/OR WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS AFTER BID OPENING DATE 10 Bidder's Statement Of Subcontractors Part II
11 Non-Collusion Declaration Of Sub-Contractor
12 Bidder's Statement of Good Faith Effort for Local Hire 13 Bidder's List For The City Of Salinas Engineering And Transportation Department $ 12,800,977.50 $ 8,138,006.96
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4/11/2023 J:\p\9981.9120.9080\9981_Chip Seal_2022\PlanetBID\BID Operations\BID Opening\BID_tab\2022-23_Multi_CIP9981.9120.9080_Pavement Maintenance Page 3 of 3

EXHIBIT A
2 3
4 5
6 1
2 3
4 5
6 1

N SANBORN RD

N SANBORN RD

E LAUREL DR

CONSTITUTION BLVD

WILLIAMS RD

NATIVIDAD RD

N SANBORN RD

LARKIN ST

FREEDOM PKWY W LAUREL DR
US 101

ABBOTT ST

W BLANCO RD

DAVIS RD

ROY DIAZ ST

E BORONDA RD

INDEPENDENCE BLVD

RIDER AVE

DEL MONTE AVE
HARDEN

PKWY MADRID ST

N MAIN ST

N MAIN ST

E BERNAL
DR

DAVIS RD

S MAIN ST

WILLIAMS RD

FREEDOM PKWY

E BORONDA RD

SAN JUAN GRADE RD

SHERWOOD DR

E BLANCO RD S MAIN ST
US 101

HARKINS RD

C I RCL E DR WORK ST

MADEIRA ST S SANBORN RD

E ROSSI ST

NATIVIDAD RD

ROGGE RD

E ALVIN DR

E BORONDA RD

SCONBERG PKWY

BARDIN RD

E ALISAL ST

SKYWAY BLVD

E ALISAL ST

JOHN ST

CALLE CEBU

E MARKET ST

E ALISAL ST MAIN ST

BORONDA RD

N DAVIS RD

N DAVIS RD

CALLE DEL ADOBE

W ROSSI ST

E BLANCO RD

S SANBORN RD

HARRIS RD

N MAIN ST SAN JUAN GRADE RD N MAIN ST

RUSSELL RD
N

SANBORN
RD

CONSTITUTION BLVD

EL DORADO DR

AUTO CENTER CIR

MC KINNON ST

MC KINNON ST

W ROSSI ST
E. ROMIE LANE
LINCOLN AVE. CHURCH ST

BARDIN RD

BARDIN WAY

FREEDOM PKWY

NATIVIDAD RD KLAMATH DR

MONTE BELLA BLVD

TUSCANY BLVD

PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE
/ CHIP SEAL

SAN JUAN GRADE

SLURRY SEAL

LOCATION MAP

NOT TO SCALE
J:\p\9981-Chip Seal\base\COS_2022-23_projects.dwg Feb 28, 2023-3:41pm LEGEND
183
68 101
68 101
2022-23 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE
PROJECT No. 9080, 9120, AND 9080

EXHIBIT B
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-279, Version: 1
Clean California Grant Application for AMOR Salinas Education and Outreach Approve a Resolution authorizing staff to apply for the Clean California Local Grant Program Cycle 2 funding for up to $750,000 for AMOR Salinas education and outreach and authorizing acceptance of the grant if awarded to the City.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/10/2023
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 2, 2023
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
FROM: STEVEN S. CARRIGAN, CITY MANAGER
BY: SOPHIA ROME, COMMUNITY RELATIONS MANAGER
TITLE: CLEAN CALIFORNIA GRANT APPLICATION FOR AMOR

SALINAS EDUCATION AND OUTREACH
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution (1) authorizing staff to apply for Clean California Local Grant Program Cycle 2 funding for up to $750,000 for AMOR Salinas education and outreach; (2) authorizing acceptance of the grant if awarded to the City of Salinas (City); and (3) authorizing establishment of appropriations and corresponding revenue budget, if grant funds are awarded.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve a Resolution authorizing staff to apply for Clean California Local Grant Program Cycle 2 funding for up to $750,000 for AMOR Salinas education and outreach and authorizing acceptance of the grant if awarded to the City.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City launched the AMOR Salinas movement in 2020 to address concerns about an increase in litter and debris throughout the City. Heading into year three of AMOR Salinas, the City is seeking to expand education efforts to foster a culture of community commitment to volunteering and keeping the environment clean. The Clean California Local Grant Program (CCLGP) will expand the City’s capacity and increase available resources to support education and outreach efforts over the next two years.

BACKGROUND:

During the first year of the pandemic, there were increasing concerns regarding the amount of litter and debris accumulating across the City. Through the formation of the Litter & Debris Subcommittee, the City introduced the AMOR Salinas movement designed to address the need for citywide beautification, engage the community and partners, and focus education efforts to foster a culture of commitment to citywide beautification, increasing volunteerism, and keeping our environment clean.

Page | 2
Year one of AMOR Salinas was focused on immediate need for beautification and increasing volunteerism. Moving into year two, the City committed resources to growing awareness and marketing for AMOR Salinas. The City has increased the number of City-led volunteer clean-ups and has more than doubled the number of volunteers in the City’s database that have participated in City-led clean-ups through these AMOR Salinas efforts. There have been a growing number of partner and community-led clean-ups as well that are increasing the impact and reach of the AMOR Salinas movement.

The CCLGP will allow the City to continue to grow the AMOR Salinas movement, bring more awareness to AMOR Salinas, and focus on meaningful and impactful education within the community, including youth education and engagement. This grant application will include:
 AMOR Salinas banners along main corridors across the City  At least one AMOR Salinas art piece at City Hall with consideration for other AMOR Salinas art placement in public spaces
 Partnership with SUBA to support the Alisal Ambassador program  Additional City-led clean-ups along corridors, including supplies and materials  Education, outreach, and marketing materials for events  Education events at schools
 Part time staff support for AMOR Salinas education and outreach CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This grant aligns with the Council Strategic goals as follows:
 Economic Development
 Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability
 Youth and Seniors
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Page | 3
There was coordination with the Administration, Community Development, and Library and Community Services departments.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There is no significant impact to the General Fund. For an award of up to $750,000, the City will be responsible for up to $93,750 (12.5%). Funds will be appropriated and available in the Communications (Administration) annual operating budget in for fiscal years 2024 and 2025, as well as potential partnering with Community Development and Library and Community Services as this project aligns with Alisal Vibrancy Plan implementation and public art.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

CLEAN CALIFORNIA GRANT APPLICATION FOR AMOR SALINAS EDUCATION

AND OUTREACH
WHEREAS, the City launched the AMOR Salinas movement in 2020 to address concerns about an increase in litter and debris throughout the City of Salinas (City); and WHEREAS, heading into year three of AMOR Salinas, the City is seeking to expand education efforts to foster a culture of community commitment to volunteering and keeping the environment clean; and
WHEREAS, the Clean California Local Grant Program (CCLGP) will expand the City’s capacity and increase available resources to support education and outreach efforts over the next two years; and
WHEREAS, the CCLGP will allow the City to continue to grow the AMOR Salinas movement, bring more awareness to AMOR Salinas, and focus on meaningful and impactful education within the community, including youth education and engagement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes staff to apply for Clean California Local Grant Program Cycle 2 funding for up to $750,000 for AMOR Salinas education and outreach, authorizes acceptance of the grant if awarded to the City of Salinas, and authorizes establishment of appropriations and corresponding revenue budget, if grant funds are awarded.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
_______________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Page | 2
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-281, Version: 1
Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field; CIP No. 9005
Approve a Resolution approving the plans and specifications for the Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field, CIP No. 9005; approving the appropriation of funds in the amount of $200,000 from Measure G fund balance to CIP No. 9005; and approving award of contract to Norcal Contractor for the Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field; CIP No. 9005 in the amount of $1,456,684.92 (Bid Items 1-35).

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/10/2023
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 16, 2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, P.E., L.S., DIRECTOR
BY: ELISE RAMIREZ, P.E., SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER

JOSIE LANTACA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER
TITLE: CESAR CHAVEZ PARK SOCCER FIELD; CIP NO. 9005
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to:
1) Approve the plans and specifications for the Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field; CIP No. 9005; and
2) Approve the appropriation of funds in the amount of $200,000 from Measure G fund balance to CIP No. 9005; and
3) Approve award of contract to Norcal Contractor for the Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field; CIP No. 9005 in the amount of $1,456,684.92 (Bid Items 1-35).

BACKGROUND:

In Early 2017, the City submitted a Proposition 40 grant application to the California Department of Parks and Recreation Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) for the construction of 1 full synthetic turf soccer field, 2 youth soccer fields, and a half-court basketball court at Cesar Chavez Park. OGALS approved the grant application, and on August 15, 2017, City Council accepted the Grant Award in the amount of $998,264 (Resolution No. 21241). The grant may only be utilized toward the project’s construction cost.

Through a formal Request for Qualification process, the City contracted with BFS Landscape Architects for the preliminary and final design of the project. During the project’s design development process, the preliminary estimates determined there would be insufficient funds to cover the construction costs for the project’s original scope of work. Thus, the City submitted a request for a change in scope from OGALS, maintaining the value of the original grant amount.

The revised scope of work read: “Construct a full-sized artificial turf soccer field and minor improvements at Cesar Chavez Park in the City of Salinas”. In a letter dated March 26, 2021, OGALS approved the requested change in the project’s scope of work.

Page | 2
The revised scope of work includes the construction of a full-size synthetic turf soccer field, upgrades and adjustments to the existing irrigation system to accommodate the new layout, construction of a bioretention area, and new landscaping.

The project was advertised for construction bid on March 7, 2023, and bids were opened on April 7, 2023, with the following results (see attached Bid Tabulation Sheet for details):

Bid Results:

Contractor Total Bid
(Items 1-35)
Norcal Contractor (Salinas, CA) $1,456,684.92
Granite Rock Company (San Jose, CA) $1,804,861.00
*Landscape Pros ML Inc. (Cupertino, CA) $2,443,809.78
Engineer’s Estimate $1,500,537.75
*The bid from Landscape Pros ML Inc. was disqualified at bid opening due to an incomplete bid package submission.

Norcal Contractor (Norcal) is the apparent low bidder. Norcal’s bid is 2.92% below the engineer’s estimate.

On April 18, 2023, staff received a letter (via email - attached herewith) from the Foundation for Fair Contracting (FFC), a non- profit organization, requesting the rejection of Norcal Contractor’s bid for the following reasons: ongoing violations of prevailing wage laws resulting in wage theft, failure to comply with bid specifications/unfair competitive advantage, and failure to comply with workforce development and formal apprenticeship programs.

The City has awarded and successfully completed CIP construction contracts with Norcal Contractors via the formal/competitive bidding process. City staff conducted internal and external reference checks and staff determined Norcal performed and fully executed the CIP contracts successfully. Norcal is a local (Salinas based), family-operated, non-union contractor. Internally, city staff reported working well with Norcal adding that they had demonstrated a good faith effort to comply with the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements. They submitted timely DAS 142-Request for Dispatch of Apprentice Forms and quickly rectified any instances where staff made requests for information or corrections. In addition, staff performed external reference checks on Norcal Contractor from the City of Santa Cruz, City of Gonzales, City of Gilroy, and North Monterey County Unified School District. All external references provided positive reviews regarding Norcal on their performance and paperwork. It is important to note, most of the projects with external references were grant funded. Therefore, staff recommends awarding the project to Norcal Contractor, the apparent low bidder, in the amount of $1,456,684.92.

The provision of the “Local Purchasing Preference Ordinance” is applicable to this project, and Norcal Contractor is a local contractor.

Page | 3
CEQA CONSIDERATION:

This project has been reviewed per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and has been determined to be Categorically Exempt in accordance with Section 15303 (Class 3) and Section 15304 (Class 4) because the project involves no projected significant effects to an existing park and recreational facilities use.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The project addresses the City Council Goals of Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, Public Safety, and Youth and Seniors by providing safe recreational facilities for Salinas residents.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The process of administering this project involves Public Works, Library and Community Services, Finance, and Legal Departments.

Public Works Department coordinated the preparation of the project plans, specifications, and estimates with BFS Landscape Architects. Public Works also administered the bidding/advertisement process, and will manage, perform contract administration, and inspection of this project during construction. The project is a CIP for the Library and Community Services Department, CIP No. 9005. Finance Department manages the proper disbursement of funds, and Legal Department reviews pertinent documents/contracts to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Thus, staff from these Departments are involved with the development and execution of this project.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Total funding for this project includes the following:

Grant from State Dept of Parks and Recreation $998,264
Measure G (2/7/2018 – Council Action Date) $150,000
Transfer from CIP 9840 to CIP 9005
(12/18/2018 – Council Action Date)
$20,000
Measure G (FY 19/20) $200,000
Measure G (FY 20-21) $50,000
Measure G (FY 21/22) $80,000
Measure G (FY 22/23) $25,000
Total $1,523,264
Expenditures (encumbered & expended)
through April 24, 2023
($187,761)
Currently Available $1,335,503
Proposed Appropriation from Measure G $200,000
Total Available (if appropriation is approved) $1,535,503 Expenditures (encumbered and expended) through April 24, 2023, totaled $187,761, including Page | 4
costs associated with design (consultant fees and engineering). This leaves an unencumbered balance of $1,335,503. The estimated construction cost for this project including inspection/construction coordination, admin overhead, and contingencies, is $1,725,154.92.

Below is a summary of the projected costs:

Construction Cost (Norcal’s Bid) $1,456,684.92
Contingencies (10%) 145,670.00
Inspection/Construction Coordination (5%) 72,800.00
Admin Overhead 50,000.00
Total Estimated Project Costs $1,725,154.92
If the requested appropriation (from Measure G fund balance) in the amount of $200,000 to CIP No. 9005 is approved, funds will be insufficient to cover the total estimated project costs. The budget for next year’s CIP will include a request of appropriation in the amount of $250,000 to CIP 9005 (from Measure G funds). If approved, this will cover the rest of the estimated costs for the project.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Location Map
Bid Tabulations
Letter from FFC dated April 18, 2023
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING

BID AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT TO NORCAL CONTRACTOR FOR THE CESAR CHAVEZ PARK SOCCER FIELD; CIP 9005, AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $200,000 FROM MEASURE G FUND BALANCE TO CIP NO. 9005
WHEREAS, on August 15, 2017, the City Council accepted a Proposition 40 Grant Award from the California Department of Parks and Recreation Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) in the amount of $998,264 for the construction of 1 full synthetic turf soccer field, 2 youth soccer fields, and a half-court basketball court at Cesar Chavez Park (Resolution No. 21241); and
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2021, OGALS approved the change of the project scope to only construct the full synthetic turf soccer field, and related improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer approved the project plans and specifications and authorized the solicitation for bids for this project; and WHEREAS, on March 7, 2023, the Cesar Chavez Soccer Field; CIP 9005 was advertised for bidding; and
WHEREAS, representatives of the City Clerk of Salinas on April 7, 2023, at a public meeting held virtually via Zoom, publicly opened, examined, and declared all bids or proposals received via PlanetBids, an electronic bid advertisement website for the Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field; CIP No. 9005 in accordance with the plans and specifications for such work on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the lowest bidder, Norcal Contractor, submitted a bid that is 2.92% below the engineering estimate; and
WHEREAS, reference checks on Norcal Contractor from internal and external sources have positive reviews regarding Norcal Contractor on their performance and paperwork; and WHEREAS, to award the project, staff is requesting an appropriation of funds in the amount of $200,000 from Measure G fund balance to CIP No. 9005; and WHEREAS, City staff thereupon reported the results of the bidding to the City Council at its regular meeting on May 16, 2023, and the Council in open session at said meeting examined the report of staff.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that in reference to the Cesar Chavez Soccer Field CIP 9005 that all of said bids or proposals are rejected except the bid of Norcal Contractor, (hereinafter referred to as “Successful Bidder”), being the lowest and best bid which is hereby accepted. The subject contract is hereby awarded to said Successful Bidder for the sum of $1,456,684.92 (Bid Items 1-35), and more specifically at the unit prices particularly set forth and contained in the Proposal for the Cesar Chavez Soccer Field; CIP 9005, of said Successful Bidder 2 previously filed in the office of the City Clerk on April 7, 2023. Said sum shall be paid by the City of Salinas to said Successful Bidder in cash, lawful money of the United States of America, payable at the time and in the manner specified in the plans and specifications and contract documents for the project filed in the office of the City Clerk, entitled “Cesar Chavez Soccer Field; CIP 9005”; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said plans and specifications are hereby accepted and adopted for said work and are also referred to for all of the details and particulars thereof, and said plans and specifications are by reference incorporated in and hereby made a part of this resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves the appropriation of funds in the amount of $200,000 from Measure G fund balance to CIP No. 9005; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of Salinas is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the City of Salinas to execute a contract consistent with the Proposal of said Successful Bidder for said work.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of May 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP
BID TABULATION
Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field; Project No. 9005
Drawing No. 8250
Item # Item Description Unit of Measure Quantity Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total 1 Construction Coordination/Mobilization  LS 1 $71,454.00  $71,454.00  $6,700.00  $6,700.00  $124,500.00  $124,500.00  $185,000.00  $185,000.00 2 SWPPP Development LS 1 $5,000.00  $5,000.00  $24,500.00  $24,500.00  $1,200.00  $1,200.00  $24,000.00  $24,000.00 3 SWPPP Implementation LS 1 $10,000.00  $10,000.00  $14,500.00  $14,500.00  $52,300.00  $52,300.00  $37,756.97  $37,756.97 4 Clear and Grub entire Area SF 140000 $0.25  $35,000.00  $0.11  $15,400.00  $0.95  $133,000.00  $0.89  $124,600.00 5 Demolish/Salvage Irrigation LS 1 $3,000.00  $3,000.00  $17,600.00  $17,600.00  $34,400.00  $34,400.00  $15,927.47  $15,927.47 6 Miscellaneous Demolition LS 1 $3,000.00  $3,000.00  $2,500.00  $2,500.00  $7,100.00  $7,100.00  $15,433.20  $15,433.20 7 Off Haul/Excavation – Turf Field CY 1500 $40.00  $60,000.00  $36.56  $54,840.00  $61.00  $91,500.00  $23.15  $34,725.00 8 Off Haul/Excavation – Trench CY 150 $40.00  $6,000.00  $47.19  $7,078.50  $170.00  $25,500.00  $37.79  $5,668.50 9 Survey Staking SF 67000 $0.60  $40,200.00  $0.13  $8,710.00  $0.22  $14,740.00  $1.22  $81,740.00 10 Rough Grading CY 1350 $40.00  $54,000.00  $26.90  $36,315.00  $56.00  $75,600.00  $6.54  $8,829.00 11 Soil Stabilization (Lime Treated) SF 62000 $2.25  $139,500.00  $1.73  $107,260.00  $2.00  $124,000.00  $1.12  $69,440.00 12 Fine Grading SF 67000 $0.50  $33,500.00  $0.55  $36,850.00  $0.76  $50,920.00  $0.66  $44,220.00 13 Turf Field Base Rock – Class 2 (3” depth) TN 865 $55.00  $47,575.00  $84.83  $73,377.95  $80.00  $69,200.00  $50.64  $43,803.60 14 Trench Rock TN 250 $60.00  $15,000.00  $158.69  $39,672.50  $108.00  $27,000.00  $69.67  $17,417.50 15 Impermeable Liner SF 62000 $0.25  $15,500.00  $0.48  $29,760.00  $0.50  $31,000.00  $1.52  $94,240.00 16 Synthetic Turf and Infill SF 62000 $8.00  $496,000.00  $5.72  $354,640.00  $4.55  $282,100.00  $13.70  $849,400.00 17 Performance Pad SF 62000 $1.50  $93,000.00  $2.09  $129,580.00  $1.85  $114,700.00  $4.88  $302,560.00 18 Perimeter Curb with Nailer LF 1030 $25.00  $25,750.00  $38.73  $39,891.90  $69.50  $71,585.00  $42.78  $44,063.40 19 Turf – Hydroseed  SF 73425 $0.35  $25,698.75  $1.21  $88,844.25  $1.00  $73,425.00  $0.84  $61,677.00 20 Bioretention Planting with Pea Gravel SF 5500 $6.00  $33,000.00  $5.79  $31,845.00  $4.80  $26,400.00  $5.97  $32,835.00 21 Split Rail Fence (At Bioretention Area) LF 140 $50.00  $7,000.00  $253.50  $35,490.00  $200.00  $28,000.00  $53.83  $7,536.20 22 Adjust Existing Utility Boxes in Field LS 1 $2,560.00  $2,560.00  $1,500.00  $1,500.00  $1,500.00  $1,500.00  $441.60  $441.60 23 Irrigation SF 73425 $1.00  $73,425.00  $1.21  $88,844.25  $1.00  $73,425.00  $2.32  $170,346.00 24 8” Plastic Perforated Pipe LF 810 $65.00  $52,650.00  $15.59  $12,627.90  $32.00  $25,920.00  $65.66  $53,184.60 25 Plastic Pipe (8” HDPE) LF 141 $95.00  $13,395.00  $75.03  $10,579.23  $133.00  $18,753.00  $72.96  $10,287.36 26 Cleanout EA 7 $150.00  $1,050.00  $500.00  $3,500.00  $735.00  $5,145.00  $2,460.00  $17,220.00 27 Storm Drain Pipe (12” RCP) LF 42 $250.00  $10,500.00  $76.47  $3,211.74  $230.00  $9,660.00  $95.26  $4,000.92 28 Bubbler Box EA 3 $4,200.00  $12,600.00  $2,600.00  $7,800.00  $2,650.00  $7,950.00  $2,336.86  $7,010.58 29 Overflow Inlet EA 1 $4,800.00  $4,800.00  $3,800.00  $3,800.00  $6,650.00  $6,650.00  $8,215.30  $8,215.30 30 Type “A” SDMH EA 1 $10,800.00  $10,800.00  $13,100.00  $13,100.00  $22,650.00  $22,650.00  $4,351.20  $4,351.20 31 Off Haul/Excavation – Bioretention Area CY 653 $100.00  $65,300.00  $69.20  $45,187.60  $60.00  $39,180.00  $6.66  $4,348.98 32 Bioretention Soil Mix (24” depth) CY 190 $80.00  $15,200.00  $168.72  $32,056.80  $243.00  $46,170.00  $81.62  $15,507.80 33 Class 2 Permeable Material (22” depth) CY 174 $70.00  $12,180.00  $196.45  $34,182.30  $217.00  $37,758.00  $28.48  $4,955.52 34 Cobblestone Energy Dissipater CY 6 $150.00  $900.00  $990.00  $5,940.00  $1,530.00  $9,180.00  $1,256.79  $7,540.74 35 Relocate Lighting/Electrical Facilities including Conduit with Conductors (2 Conduits) and pull boxes LS 1 $6,000.00  $6,000.00  $39,000.00  $39,000.00  $42,750.00  $42,750.00  $35,526.34  $35,526.34 $1,500,537.75  $1,456,684.92  $1,804,861.00  $2,443,809.78 Granite Rock Company
5225 Hellyer Avenue, Suite 220
San Jose, CA 95138
408‐574‐1400
Norcal Contractor
260 Espinosa Road
Salinas, CA 93907
831‐238‐1513
Bid awarded on ________, 2023 by Salinas City Council by Resolution No.____________ (NCS) to ________ for the sum of $___________ for Items ___________. All other bids were rejected and bid bonds returned.Dated this ___ day of _____, 2023. _____________________________________________City Clerk Bid Opening: 4/07/2023 @ 2:00 PM, Electronic
Project Engineer: Elise Ramirez, P.E.  Landscape Pros ML Inc Cupertino, CA 95014
408‐920‐7718
Project Coordinator: Josie Lantaca  20432/5B Silverado Avenue PROPOSAL ITEMS:

Engineer's Estimate
Total Bid (Items 1‐35)(For Comparison Only)
1 of 2 J:\p\9005 Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field\Bid Documents\9005 Bid Tab BID TABULATION
Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field; Project No. 9005
Drawing No. 8250
Granite Rock Company
5225 Hellyer Avenue, Suite 220
San Jose, CA 95138
408‐574‐1400
Norcal Contractor
260 Espinosa Road
Salinas, CA 93907
831‐238‐1513
Bid Opening: 4/07/2023 @ 2:00 PM, Electronic
Project Engineer: Elise Ramirez, P.E.  Landscape Pros ML Inc Cupertino, CA 95014
408‐920‐7718
Project Coordinator: Josie Lantaca  20432/5B Silverado Avenue Engineer's Estimate

8.  BIDDER'S STATEMENT OF SUBCONTRACTORS PART IIITEMS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PROPOSAL ON BID OPENING DATE:4.  INSURANCE CERTIFICATION YES YES Incomplete 5.  NON‐COLLUSION DECLARATION OF CONTRACTOR YES YES Incomplete 6.  BIDDER'S STATEMENT OF SUBCONTRACTORS PART 1 YES YES

YESYESYESYES

YESYESYESYES

1.  FULLY COMPLETED & SIGNED PROPOSAL FORM Incomplete3.  BIDDER'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, TECHNICAL ABILITY, AND EXPERIENCEITEMS TO BE SUBMITTED BY LOWEST BIDDER AND SECOND LOWEST BIDDER WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS AFTER BID OPENING DATE:

Incomplete

2.  BIDDER'S BOND NO
Incomplete

7.  ADDENDUM NO. 1 YES9.  NON‐COLLUSION DECLARATION OF SUB‐CONTRACTOR11. BIDDER'S LIST FOR THE CITY OF SALINAS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT10. BIDDER'S STATEMENT OF GOOD FAITH EFFORT FOR LOCAL HIRE 2 of 2 J:\p\9005 Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field\Bid Documents\9005 Bid Tab VIA EMAIL – [email protected]
April 18, 2023
David Jacobs
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Ave.

Salinas, CA 93901
RE: BID ADVISORY
Low Bidder: NorCal Contractor
Awarding Agency: City of Salinas
Project: Cesar Chavez Park Soccer Field
FFC Case No.: 1113SJ
Dear Mr. Jacobs:

The Foundation for Fair Contracting (FFC) is a nonprofit organization which has been serving the public interest since 1985. The objective of the FFC is to monitor compliance with prevailing wage laws pertaining to the construction industry, including informing and educating industry stakeholders. Unbalanced bids raise questions in regard to performance and compliance with the rules and regulations for the payment of prevailing wages, and the safety and well-being of the workforce. It further opens the question of excessive future change orders, the fairness to and rights of other bidders in the bidding process, and the intent of the competitive bidding process in general.

In deference to all bidders and in order for the public interest to best be served, please enter this formal bid advisory against the above-noted contractor as a matter of public record. We respectfully request that NorCal Contractor (NorCal) bid be rejected for the following reasons:
• ONGOING VIOLATIONS OF PREVAILING WAGE LAWS RESULTING IN WAGE THEFT
NorCal has numerous infractions/violations which have resulted in willful circumvention of the laws and regulations governing the payment of prevailing wages, including, but not limited to, violations resulting in wage theft and non-compliance with apprenticeship laws. NorCal has engaged in this pattern of unlawful activity on various public works prevailing wage projects. Civil Wage and Penalty Assessments have been issued to NorCal by the State of California, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE), Labor Commissioner’s office. We have provided supporting documentation for your review.

Furthermore, NorCal is currently under investigation by our offices and complaints have been submitted to the State of California, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE), Labor Commissioner’s office in connection with issues provided below. We have provided supporting documentation for your review. ▪ Misclassifications resulting in underpayments.
▪ Failure to comply with overtime requirements.

David Jacobs
City of Salinas
April 18, 2023

▪ Failure to comply with apprenticeship requirements.
▪ Failing to report all workers on certified payrolls.
• FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH BID SPECIFICATIONS/UNFAIR COMPETITIVE

ADVANTAGE
NorCal’s bid is below the Engineer’s Estimate and in excess of 23% lower than all other bidders on this project. A large bid variance commonly indicates a failure to account for the proper prevailing wage rate – including travel and subsistence. If awarded the project, this contractor would need to submit change orders to complete the project in accordance with the specifications and/or compromise prevailing wage laws/standards.

This gives NorCal an unfair advantage in its bidding practices against its competitors and puts the City of Salinas into a precarious legal position. • FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND FORMAL

APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS
NorCal has not made a good faith effort to participate and invest in Local Workforce Development, nor have they participated in local hiring of workers in the community through formal and recognized pre-apprenticeship programs and formal apprenticeship programs for specific apprenticeable crafts. They have failed to request, employ, train, and pay the proper prevailing wages to apprentices.

Please contact our office with questions, comments, or clarifications.

Sincerely,
Jesse Jimenez
Executive Director
Case: 1113SJ
cc: City of Salinas – Mayor and Councilmembers
Kimbley Craig – Email: [email protected]
Carla Viviana González – Email: [email protected] Tony Barrera – Email: [email protected]
Steve McShane – Email: [email protected]
Orlando Osornio – Email: [email protected]
Andrew Sandoval – Email: [email protected]
Anthony Rocha – Email: [email protected]
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-284, Version: 1
2023 Continuum of Care Emergency Solutions Grant Program Application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development
Approve a Resolution approving the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Resolution approving an application for funding and the execution of a grant agreement and any amendments thereto from the 2023-2024 funding year of the State ESG program, Continuum of Care Allocation NOFA; authorizing the submission of an application to HCD for the 2023 HCD ESG Program CoC Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA); and authorizing the appropriation of awarded 2023 HCD ESG CoC funds.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/10/2023
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 16, 2023
FROM: LISA BRINTON, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

THROUGH ROD POWELL, PLANNING MANAGER

FRANCISCO BRAMBILA, MANAGEMENT ANALYST
BY: MARIA CAMBRON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANALYST
TITLE: 2023 CONTINUUM OF CARE EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT

PROGRAM APPLICATION
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a resolution authorizing:

1. approval of a California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) resolution to submit an application for funding and the execution of a grant agreement and any amendments thereto for the State ESG program, Continuum of Care Allocation 2023- 2024 funding year Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA); and

2. the submission of an application to HCD for the 2023 HCD ESG CoC Program NOFA; and

3. the City Manager or designee to execute all applicable HCD grant documents, necessary amendments, and applicable subrecipient agreements; and

4. the appropriation of awarded 2023 HCD ESG CoC funds to the Emergency Solutions Grant – CoC account
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City of Salinas has served as the State Emergency Solutions Grant Administrative Entity (AE) on behalf of the local Salinas/Monterey/San Benito Counties CoC #506 since 2016. In this capacity, the Salinas Community Development Department Housing and Community Development Division staff released the annual ESG NOFA, convened a rating and ranking panel, and presented recommended funding awards and allocation to the CoC Leadership Council for final approval.

As a function of its HCD ESG AE role for the CoC, the City must execute and submit an HCD Resolution authorizing and directing the submission of the required application and execution of City Funding Agreements/Contracts and related documents (e.g., environmental review documents, request for release of funds) to implement the 2023 HCD ESG CoC Allocation grant program. HCD has preliminarily advised ESG AEs to prepare for a yet-to-be-determined 2023 Page | 2
NOFA release and short application submission deadline to allow for final awards by December 2024.

BACKGROUND:

In order to meet HCD’s projected ESG application deadline, the City published its annual NOFA on February 4, 2023, identifying an estimated 2023 ESG CoC allocation of approximately $269,709. Following the March 6, 2023, NOFA application deadline, the City assembled a diverse rating and ranking panel to assist in the review of applications and prioritization of funding recommendations. CoC #506 Leadership Council approved final fund allocation on April 26, 2023, which was presented to the City’s Housing and Land Use Committee on May 9, 2023.

The table below provides a timeline of applicable activities and dates associated with the City’s 2023 ESG CoC Program NOFA and application.

HCD 2023 ESG CoC Program Timeline
Milestone Timeframe
City 2023 NOFA Released February 4, 2023
City NOFA Application Workshop February 9, 2023
City NOFA Application Deadline March 6, 2023
City NOFA Rating and Ranking March 2023
Leadership Council Final Approval of 2023 ESG CoC Allocation April 26, 2023 Salinas HLUC Informational Presentation May 9, 2023
Salinas City Council Resolution May 16, 2023
HCD 2023 ESG CoC NOFA Release May 2023
2023 ESG CoC Application Submittal to HCD TBD
HCD Award Notifications TBD
HCD/City Standard Agreement Executed TBD
City Funding Agreements Executed TBD
DISCUSSION:

HCD ESG funds may be utilized within six primary funding components including Rapid Rehousing, Homeless Prevention, Street Outreach, Emergency Shelter, Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) and Program Administration. No less than forty percent (40%) of allocated funds must be used to support Rapid Rehousing activities and projects. The following table shows the estimated funding amounts available per category for the HCD 2023 ESG CoC Program.
2023 HCD ESG CoC Allocations
ESG Component % Allocation Allocation Amount
Page | 3
Administration 2.9% $7,936
Emergency Shelter

57.1% $153,773
Street Outreach
Homeless Prevention
HMIS
Rapid Re-Housing* 40.0% $108,000
Total 100% $269,709**
* Minimum 40% of allocation must be spent for Rapid Re-Housing. ** Final allocation will be based on NOFA release
DEPARTMENT COORDINATION:

This agenda item is administered by the City’s Community Development Department Housing and Community Development Division in coordination with the City Attorney and Finance Department. Additional, external coordination with outside agencies and jurisdictions, such as HCD and staff of the local CoC #506 Leadership Council, has also occurred.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

HCD ESG Program CoC Allocation funding administered by the City allows the undertaking of a variety of programs instrumental in providing homeless services throughout the City and region, furthering partnerships with public service organizations, and addressing the human service needs of the City’s low-income, elderly, and special needs communities. Execution of the proposed resolutions supports the City of Salinas Strategic Plan 2022-2025 Goal and Strategy of Housing/Affordable Housing.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There is no General Fund impact associated with this agenda item. 2023 HCD ESG CoC funds will be appropriated to the Emergency Solutions Grant – CoC fund.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution 2023 HCD ESG CoC Application
State Resolution 2023 ESG CoC Application
2023 HCD ESG CoC Funding Allocations – Leadership Council approved

RESOLUTION NO. ____ ( N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING SUBMISSON OF THE 2023 CONTINUUM OF CARE EMERGENCY

SOLUTIONS GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Salinas (City) is the only City within Monterey and San Benito Counties that administers the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program Continuum of Care (CoC) Allocation; and, WHEREAS, HCD plans to release a future 2023 ESG CoC Allocation Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) with an estimated formula funding allocation of $269,709 for the local Salinas/Monterey/San Benito Counties CoC #506; and,
WHEREAS, the City, as the CoC #506 Administrative Entity, intends to submit a 2023 HCD ESG CoC Allocation NOFA application by the yet-to-be-determined application deadline to secure local funding; and,
WHEREAS, should HCD increase the initial 2023 ESG CoC Allocation funding amount to the local Salinas/Monterey/San Benito Counties CoC #506, the City is hereby authorized and directed to receive an ESG grant, not to exceed $600,000 in accordance with all HCD rules and laws; and,
WHEREAS, the City hereby agrees to administer ESG funds for eligible activities as approved by the CoC #506 Leadership Council and HCD in accordance with all grant program requirements, and other rules and laws, as well as in a manner consistent and in compliance with the Standard Agreement and any other contracts between the City and HCD; and, WHEREAS, the City anticipates the receipt of the HCD 2023 CoC ESG allocation in December 2024 and will appropriate funds to the Emergency Solutions Grant – CoC account.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes a California Department of Housing and Community Development resolution approving the application for funding and the execution of a grant agreement and any amendments thereto from the 2023-2024 funding year of the State ESG Program Continuum of Care Allocation NOFA; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes the submission of an application to HCD for the 2023 HCD ESG Program CoC Notice of Funding Availability; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute all applicable HCD grant documents, necessary amendments, and applicable subrecipient agreements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes the appropriation of awarded 2023 HCD CoC ESG funds to the Emergency Solutions Grant – CoC account.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of May 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
_________________________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
1 RESOLUTION NO.___________

A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING AND THE

EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO FROM THE 2023-2024 FUNDING YEAR OF THE STATE ESG PROGRAM, CONTINUUM OF CARE ALLOCATION NOFA.

A necessary quorum and majority of the council members of City of Salinas (“Applicant”) hereby consent to, adopt and ratify the following resolution:

A. WHEREAS the State of California (the “State”), Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) will issue a Notice of Funding Availability (“NOFA”) for the Continuum of Care Allocation in May,___, 2023 under the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program (Program, or ESG Program); and B. WHEREAS Applicant is an approved state ESG Administrative Entity SECTION 1:

Applicant is an approved Applicant by their Continuum of Care under the Continuum of Care Allocation and is hereby authorized and directed to receive an ESG grant, in an amount not to exceed $600,000 in accordance with all applicable rules and laws.

SECTION 2:

The Department may approve funding allocations for the ESG Program, subject to the terms and conditions of the NOFA, Program regulations, and the Standard Agreement.

The Applicant acknowledges compliance with all state and federal public participationrequirements in the development of its applications.

SECTION 3:

If applicant receives a grant of ESG funds from the Department pursuant to the above referenced ESG NOFA, it represents and certifies that it will use all such funds in a manner consistent and in compliance with all applicable state and federal statutes, rules, regulations, and laws, including without limitation all rules and laws regarding the ESG Program, as well as any and all other contracts Applicant may have with the Department.

SECTION 4:

The Applicant hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager, or Community Development Director, to execute and deliver all applications and act on the Applicant’s behalf in all matters pertaining to all such applications. 2 SECTION 5:

If an application is approved, the City Manager, or Community Development Director, is authorized to enter into, execute and deliver the grant agreement (i.e., Standard Agreement) and any and all subsequent amendments thereto with the State of California for the purposes of the grant.

SECTION 6:

If an application is approved, the City Manager, or Community Development Director, or Planning Manager is authorized to sign and submit Funds Requests and all required reporting forms and other documentation as may be required by the State of California from time to time in connection with the grant.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Salinas held on May 16, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:______ NOES:_______
ABSENT:_______ ABSTAIN:_______
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
Salinas City Council

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
City of Salinas
I, Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk of the City of Salinas, State of California, hereby certify the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by said City Council on this 16th day of May, 2023.
__________________________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk of the City of Salinas, State of California
Grant Number: Grant Term:

City Council Approval: Pending Stardard Agreement Start Date:Resolution No.: Pending Stardard Agreement End Date:Leadership Council Approval: April 26, 2023 Fund: 2941 Amount
Final COC Allocation $ 269,709 $ 108,000
$ 26,970$ 7,936
Total ESG Funding $ 269,709
Agency Street Outreach Emergency Shelter Homeless Prevention Rapid Re-Housing * HMIS ** Program Administration Ranking City of Salinas $ 7,079 $ 7,936
Community Homeless Solutions $ 40,000 $ 40,000 3City of Salinas $ 85,000 $ 85,000 2Franciscan Workers of Junipero Serra $ 120,000 $ 120,000 4Interim, Inc. $ 90,000 $ 80,000 $ 10,000 1Central Coast Center for Independent Living (CCCIL) $ 65,322 166,644 $ 100,822 $ 500 $ 3 Total Funding Request $ 508,723 $ 285,000 $ 50,000 $ 65,322 $ 100,822 $ 500 $ 7,936 Request Percentage 188.6% 105.7% 18.5% 24.2% 37.4% 0.2% 2.9% Agency Street Outreach Emergency Shelter Homeless Prevention Rapid Re-Housing * HMIS ** Program Administration Ranking City of Salinas $ 7,936 $ 7,936
Community Homeless Solutions $ - City of Salinas $ 63,273 $ 63,273 2Franciscan Workers of Junipero Serra $ - Interim, Inc. $ 90,000 $ 80,000 $ 10,000 1Central Coast Center for Independent Living (CCCIL) $ 108,500 $ 500 108,000 $ 3 Total Funding Request $ 143,273 269,709 $ 10,000 $ - $ 108,000 $ 500 $ 7,936 $ Request Percentage 100.0% 53.1% 3.7% 0.0% 40.0% 0.2% 2.9% State HCD ESG Leadership Council Final Approval
Agency Street Outreach Emergency Shelter Homeless Prevention Rapid Re-Housing * HMIS ** Program Administration Ranking City of Salinas $ 7,936 $ 7,936
Interim, Inc. $ 90,000 $ 80,000 $ 10,000 1City of Salinas Salinas Outreach & Response Team (SORT) $ 63,273 $ 63,273 2Central Coast Center for Independent Living (CCCIL) $ 108,500 $ 500 108,000 $ 3 Total Funding Request $ 269,709 $ 143,273 $ 10,000 $ - $ 108,000 $ 500 $ 7,936Request Percentage 100.0% 53.1% 3.7% 0.0% 40.0% 0.2% 2.9% MCHOME Street Outreach & Emergency ShelterCCCIL Rapid Rehousing and Housing Stabilization Program State HCD ESG Funding Funding Restrictions

CITY OF SALINAS

FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR STATE HCD ESG FUNDS
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
DRAFT
1 year
Project or Program
Program AdministrationProgram AdministrationH.O.M.E. Resource CenterSalinas Outreach & Response Team (SORT) *At least 40% to be used for Rapid Re-Housing
**No more than 10% to be used for HMIS
Program Administration
State HCD ESG Funding Request Total Funding
Requested
ESG Components Requested Funding Allocations
Project or Program
Streets To Homes Encampment OutreachMCHOME Street Outreach & Emergency Shelter CCCIL Rapid Rehousing and Housing Stabilization Program Total Funding
ESG Components Funding Allocations
Project or Program
Program Administration
State HCD ESG Funding Staff Recommendations Total Funding Recommendation
ESG Components Recommended Funding Allocations
H.O.M.E. Resource CenterSalinas Outreach & Response Team (SORT)Streets To Homes Encampment OutreachMCHOME Street Outreach & Emergency Shelter CCCIL Rapid Rehousing and Housing Stabilization Program City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-300, Version: 1
Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project
Approve a Resolution authorizing the acceptance of Active Transportation Grant funds in the amount of $8,079,000; authorize the establishment of a new CIP project, “Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project,” with appropriations totaling $9,635,000; and authorize the Public Works Director to execute all agreements and any required paperwork with Caltrans for the Active Transportation Grant Program.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/10/2023
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 16, 2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FROM: DAVID JACOBS P.E., L.S., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: ANDREW EASTERLING, TRAFFIC ENGINEER
TITLE: HARDEN PARKWAY PATH AND SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

PROJECT
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to:
1) Authorize the acceptance of Active Transportation Grant funds in the amount of $8,079,000;
2) Authorize the establishment of a new CIP project, “Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project,” with appropriations totaling $9,635,000, a transfer of $8,079,000 from the Special Const Assist – Fed & St Fund to the CIP fund and a corresponding revenue budget, plus a transfer of $1,556,000 matching funds from the Measure X Transportation and Safety Fund to the CIP Fund for the Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project; and
3) Authorize the Public Works Director to execute all agreements and any required paperwork with Caltrans for the Active Transportation Grant Program.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City recently developed a Safe Routes to Schools Plan over a three-year process involving extensive community outreach and public engagement. As part of the Safe Routes to Schools planning effort, the City implemented a pop-up demonstration project for Harden Middle School.

After the pop-up demonstration project, the team conducted a survey and found that the majority of the participating students and parents supported the project. Input received from the community helped form the final Salinas Safe Routes to Schools Plan adopted by City Council Resolution on December 6, 2022. In partnership with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County the City submitted an application to the Active Transportation Grant Program and successfully secured $8,079,000 in funding for the Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project.

Page | 2
BACKGROUND:

On December 6, 2022, the City of Salinas adopted the Salinas Safe Routes to Schools Plan as a strategic planning document by Resolution No. 22533 (Attachment 1). Public input was the foundation of the process to create the Safe Routes to Schools Plan. The planning team developed an outreach plan and sought input from community members to understand school transportation needs and barriers and refine the draft recommendations. Parent and student surveys, presentations at parent meetings, and walking audits with school staff all contributed input on the barriers to walking and biking to schools in Salinas and the types of improvements that community members would like to see.

According to the 2021 city-wide Safe Routes to Schools survey, the top barriers to children walking and bicycling in Salinas are “driver behavior” and “traffic speed”. These concerns have been validated through school site audits, speed surveys and photos. The feedback from the parent community clearly expresses a need for routes with slower traffic or more space and protection from motorized vehicles. This means that on certain streets, bicycle lanes are not comfortable enough to encourage children and less confident riders to take the trip by bicycle instead of by car.

Harden Parkway and McKinnon Street both currently have bicycle lanes and sidewalks but have safety issues that need to be addressed to encourage higher levels of bicycling and walking in Salinas.

Harden Parkway provides access to the Northridge Mall and Harden Ranch Plaza, major shopping and employment hubs on busy North Main Street, a 6-lane arterial street which runs north-south through the community. Just a 10-minute bike ride to the south-side of the community is the Sherwood Park neighborhood. In combination with several other streets and paths, Harden Parkway and McKinnon Street provide one of the only routes for students and residents of the Sherwood Park neighborhood and Harden Plaza affordable housing complex to access Harden Middle School, higher education and the Northridge Mall while minimizing travel on dangerous North Main Street.

The intersection of Harden Parkway and McKinnon Street is currently controlled by an all-way stop with crosswalks on all four approaches. During the school hours the intersection can be congested with both vehicular traffic, and platoons of students crossing the intersection. The City Public Works Department routinely monitors intersections, and every few years brings a report to Council to prioritize intersection improvements. The last intersection improvements priority list was presented to Council in 2020, whereas the City Council approved Resolution No. 21915 (Attachment 2) prioritizing the intersection of Harden Parkway at McKinnon Street for improvements. The City developed a draft Intersection Control Evaluation (Attachment 3) to test the benefit and cost performance of different intersection improvements for Harden Parkway at McKinnon Street over a 20-year period. The analysis found a roundabout-controlled intersection would be the preferred alternative. The draft Intersection Control Evaluation would be finalized as part of the project approval and environmental document phase of the project.

As part of the Safe Routes to Schools planning effort, the City implemented a pop-up demonstration project for Harden Middle School. The pop-up event temporarily installed some of cost-effective infrastructure recommendations from the Safe Routes to School Plan. These events were an opportunity for the community to try out recommendations from the Safe Routes to Schools Plan and provide feedback before the City takes steps to install more permanent Page | 3
infrastructure. Feedback from the community was used to help refine the recommendations in the Safe Routes to School Plan, before taking the Plan to City Council for adoption. After the pop-up demonstration project, the team conducted a survey (Attachment 4) and found that 60% wanted to see the changes made permanent, 9% wanted to see the changes made permanent with some changes, 20% did not support the changes, and 11% were undecided. Additionally, students from California State University Monterey Bay (CSUMB) conducted a study (Attachment 5) to analyze how the pop-up demonstration project influenced student behavior. The study found that the popup demonstration project increased overall pedestrian traffic during the month the temporary improvements were installed. The data seems to suggest with the improvements more students would feel safe and comfortable walking to school, which could encourage a more active and sustainable transportation behaviors.

On June 15, 2022, following the feedback the Safe Routes to Schools team received from the popup temporary project, the City in partnership with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) submitted an application to the Active Transportation Grant Program to request funding for improvements identified in the Salinas Safe Routes to Schools Plan, including a 0.77-mile multi-use path with a road diet on Harden Parkway from El Dorado Drive to Regency Circle. The reconfiguration will transform a 4-lane roadway to a 2-lane roadway with a roundabout at McKinnon Street, 2-way multiuse path separated by a bioswale and accessible sidewalks.

Connecting to Harden Parkway, the project includes safe routes to school improvements on McKinnon Street including protected bike lanes connecting the proposed multiuse path on Harden Parkway to newly installed bike facilities on East Alvin Drive, high-visibility crosswalk in front of Harden Middle School and curb extensions along Westminster Drive connecting McKinnon Street to El Dorado Park. As part of this effort the City and TAMC also secured $1,548,000 of grant funding for outreach and education tasks to help encourage and promote safe walking and biking to school.

Following the acceptance of the grant, the City will need to submit paperwork to Caltrans and execute a supplemental agreement under the State master agreement. Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Public Works Director to execute any necessary agreements any required paperwork with Caltrans for the Active Transportation Grant Program. Staff also recommends that the City Council approve a Resolution to authorize the establishment of a new CIP project, “Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project,” with appropriations totaling $9,635,000, a transfer of $8,079,000 from the Special Const Assist – Fed & St Fund to the CIP fund, plus a transfer of $1,556,000 matching funds from the Measure X Transportation and Safety Fund to the CIP Fund and a corresponding revenue budget for the Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project. Once accepted the City will be able to begin the environmental, design, and non-infrastructure phases. The City will need consultant support for the environmental, design and construction support. The item will be brought back to Council to approve a professional service agreement for consultant support following a request for proposals. The item will also be brought back to Council to approve a professional service agreement with TAMC for the non-infrastructure components. Once the plans and specifications are finalized the item will come back again to City Council to approve the plans and specifications and authorize staff to advertise the project.

Page | 4
CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378). The City of Salinas will need to certify a CEQA document when the final plan is approved, prior to construction.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This item supports the City Council’s goals of “infrastructure and environmental sustainability”, “public safety”, and “youth and seniors”.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Public Works Department and Finance Department manage the project accounting. The Public Works Department manages construction contract, inspection, and final acceptance of construction projects.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There is no cost to the General Fund. This Council action authorizes the establishment of a new CIP project, “Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project,” with appropriations totaling $9,635,000, a transfer of $8,079,000 from the Special Const Assist – Fed & St Fund to the CIP fund and a corresponding revenue budget, plus a transfer of $1,556,000 matching funds from the Measure X Transportation and Safety Fund to the CIP Fund for the Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project.

The full project cost for the Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project is estimated to be $15,562,000. The grant application requested $14,006,000 in grant funding with a 10% local match of $1,556,000. The California Department of Transportation’s Active Transportation Program’s budget this cycle was roughly $650 million. 434 applications were submitted by local agencies totaling over $3.1 billion. The City successfully secured two grant applications, the Alisal Safe Routes to School Project and the Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project.

The Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project was at the cusp for funding recommendations, and the reaming ATP budget for cycle 6 was only able to award $8,079,000 of the requested grant funds. The state ATP budget currently shows a $5,927,000 shortfall in the construction phase of the project’s budget. City staff is coordinating with Caltrans staff to ensure the project is fully funded, but there is still some risk that the City may need to find additional funding sources either in future ATP cycles or other grant programs.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Attachment 1 Resolution No 22533
Attachment 2 Resolution No 21915
Attachment 3 Salinas ICE Harden-McKinnon
Attachment 4 Summary Report of Bicycle & Pedestrian Counts for Temporary Installations on McKinnon Street & Westminster Drive
Attachment 5 Temporary Demonstration Survey Results
RESOLUTION No. _______ (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION TO: 1) AUTHORIZE THE ACCEPTANCE OF ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,079,000; 2) AUTHORIZE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW CIP PROJECT, “HARDEN PARKWAY PATH AND SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT,” WITH
APPROPRIATIONS TOTALING $9,635,000, A TRANSFER OF $8,079,000 FROM THE SPECIAL CONST ASSIST – FED & ST FUND TO THE CIP FUND, PLUS A TRANSFER OF $1,556,000 MATCHING FUNDS FROM THE MEASURE X

TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY FUND TO THE CIP FUND AND A

CORRESPONDING REVENUE BUDGET FOR THE HARDEN PARKWAY PATH AND SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT; AND 3) AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS

DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND ANY REQUIRED

PAPERWORK WITH CALTRANS FOR THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION GRANT

PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the recently developed a Safe Routes to Schools Plan over a three-year process involving extensive community outreach and public engagement; and WHEREAS, as part of the Safe Routes to Schools planning effort, the City implemented a pop-up demonstration project for Harden Middle School; and WHEREAS, after the pop-up demonstration project, the team conducted a survey and found that the majority of the participating students and parents supported the project; and WHEREAS, input received from the community helped form the final Salinas Safe Routes to Schools Plan adopted by City Council Resolution on December 6, 2022; and WHEREAS, in partnership with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County the City submitted an application to the Active Transportation Grant Program and successfully secured $8,079,000 in funding for the Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project; and
WHEREAS, The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL authorizes the acceptance of Active Transportation Grant funds in the amount of $8,079,000; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorize the establishment of a new CIP project, “Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project,” with appropriations totaling $9,635,000, a transfer of $8,079,000 from the Special Const Assist – Fed & St Fund to the CIP fund and a corresponding revenue budget, plus a transfer of $1,556,000 matching funds from the Measure X Transportation and Safety Fund to the CIP Fund for the Harden Parkway Path and Safe Routes to School Project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves a Resolution to authorize the Public Works Director to execute all agreements and any required paperwork with Caltrans for the Active Transportation Grant Program.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of May 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:
_________________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
1 RESOLUTION NO. 22533 (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING THE SALINAS

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS PLAN AS A STRATEGIC PLANNING DOCUMENT WHEREAS, at its October 22, 2019, meeting the City Council authorized an agreement with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County for the use of state grant funds for the development of a Salinas Safe Routes to Schools Plan; and WHEREAS, the Traffic and Transportation Commission received updates during the December 12, 2019, March 12, 2020 and April 12, 2022 meetings; and WHEREAS, the Draft Safe Routes to School Plan was presented to City Council on October 18, 2022, and the Council was requested to provide feedback prior to adoption; and WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves a Resolution adopting the Salinas Safe Routes to Schools Plan as a strategic planning document.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: Barrera, Cromeenes, Gonzalez, McShane, Osornio, Rocha and Mayor Craig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
APPROVED:
________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: 11154038-5245-40D9-9BB3-2A1C3FDC6870 Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. 21915 (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2020 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS

PRIOTITY LIST
WHEREAS, the Traffic and Transportation Commission and City staff recommend the adoption of the 2020 Intersection Improvements Priority List to fund the top two priorities for intersection improvements; and
WHEREAS, the list of candidate intersections came from public requests, input from Commissioners and Council members, environmental documents, traffic study findings, and staff’s understanding of traffic operations; and
WHEREAS, intersection improvements may include a traffic signal, roundabout, or other traffic control device as determined most appropriate on a case by case basis; and WHEREAS, the recommended intersections met one or more warrants based on the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) and are prioritized based on the City of Salinas point system; and
WHEREAS, the top two priority intersections for improvements include Harden Parkway at McKinnon Street and Freedom Parkway at Rider Avenue; and WHEREAS, staff recommends both intersections be evaluated for a traffic signal, roundabout and other alternatives using an ICE analysis prior to making a final determination for the appropriate intersection control.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves and hereby adopts the 2020 Intersection Improvements Priority List.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 4th day of August 2020, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: Barrera. Davis, De La Rosa, McShane, Villegas and Mayor Pro Tem Cromeenes
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
APPROVED:
______________________________
Christie Cromeenes, Mayor Pro Tem
DocuSign Envelope ID: 97A74829-BD78-45B8-A0D0-CD9B0A070D36 Page | 2
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: 97A74829-BD78-45B8-A0D0-CD9B0A070D36 DRAFT ICE – Harden Parkway at McKinnon Street

Intersection Control Evaluation
Harden Parkway at McKinnon Street in Salinas, CA

INTRODUCTION
An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) was completed for the intersection of Harden Parkway and McKinnon Street (the “study intersection”) in Salinas, California. The existing four-legged intersection operates as an all-way stop-control (AWSC). Continuous growth is expected to increase demand at the study intersection. The purpose of this ICE is to determine which intersection control will provide the greatest return-on-investment (ROI) over the design-life (20 years) for the study intersection. The current demand meets signal warrant 2 (four-hour) and warrant 3 (peak hour), as described in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAAMUTCD).

The following intersection control improvement alternatives were evaluated in this ICE Analysis:
 Existing AWSC (no improvements)
 Alternative 1: Traffic Signal
 Alternative 2: Roundabout

EXISTING CONDITION AND PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES
Existing Conditions
Harden Parkway is an east-west collector with North Main Street at the west end and El Dorado Drive at the east end. McKinnon Street in a north-south local road with East Alvin Drive at the south end and East Boronda Road at the north end. Harden Parkway has a left turn pocket and through, through/right approach lanes in both directions. McKinnon Street has a left turn pocket and a thru/right turn lane in both directions. Harden Parkway and McKinnon both have a posted speed limit of 35 mph. There are sidewalks on all four corners and bicycle lanes on each approach and exit. There is residential housing on the northwest, south-west, and south-east corners and McKinnon Park on the north-east corner.

Design Year Scenarios
 Existing Conditions (2021)
 Traffic counts were taken on Thursday May 6, 2021.
 Future Conditions (2041)
 The existing counts were grown out 20 years using a linear growth rate of 1.7%.

See Appendix A for the intersection traffic volumes and heavy vehicle percentages that were used for the intersection analysis.

Existing AWSC Operations
The Existing AWSC is projected to operate at LOS F for the peak 2035 design year, with a maximum delay of 110.1 seconds and a maximum 95th percentile queue of 875 feet on WB approach. Table 1 below summarizes the operations for the Existing AWSC. See Appendix B for existing traffic signal synchro operational analysis worksheets.

Table 1: Existing AWSC Operations
AM PM
Design
Year LOS Delay (s)
95% Queue
(ft)
(approach)
LOS Delay
(s)
95% Queue
(ft)
(approach)
2021 B 11.8 75 (SB) C 23.9 150 (SB)
2041 C 16.6 150 (SB) F 89.8 475 (SB)
DRAFT ICE – Harden Parkway at McKinnon Street

Proposed Intersection Control Alternatives
Two intersection control alternatives were ultimately considered in the ICE Analysis for the intersection of Harden Parkway and McKinnon Street. See Appendix C and Appendix D for the operational analysis worksheets for each alternative.

Alternative 1: Traffic Signal
This alternative includes adding traffic signal heads to the intersection. The lane configuration would remain the same as the existing conditions. See Table 2 below for a summary of Alternative 1 operations analysis.

Table 2: Traffic Signal Operations
AM PM
Design
Year LOS Delay (s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach) LOS Delay (s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2021 A 6.2 50 (SB) A 7.9 75 (SB)
2041 A 6.9 75 (SB) B 10.6 150 (NB)
This alternative would replace the Existing AWSC with a roundabout. See Table 3 below for a summary of Alternative 2 operations analysis.

Alternative 2: Roundabout
Table 3: Roundabout Operations
AM PM
Design
Year v/c Delay (s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach) v/c Delay (s) 95% Queue (ft) (approach)
2021 0.246 5.2 50 (SB) 0.565 9.6 150 (EB)
2041 C0.289 5.7 50 (SB) 0.585 11.9 150 (EB)

SUMMARY OF KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Four performance metrics are evaluated at the study intersection to calculate the Benefit Cost (B/C) Ratio which measures the expected return on investment for each proposed intersection control. The performance measures used to calculate the benefits of the proposed improvement compared to the existing condition, or no project alternative are:
 Safety Benefit (of the proposed intersection control type)  Delay Reduction Benefit (of the proposed intersection control type) Performance measures used to calculate the conceptual level costs of the proposed intersection control improvement compared to the existing condition, or no project alternative are:
 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Cost (added costs of the proposed intersection control type)  Initial Capital Cost (added costs of the proposed intersection control type) Refer to Appendix E for a detailed description of each performance measure and the Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table1 that were used in this B/C Analysis.
1 Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table, Caltrans, January 2020.

DRAFT ICE – Harden Parkway at McKinnon Street

PERFORMANCE MEASURE SUMMARY
The following figures show the cost of key performance measures for each control types at the intersection of Harden Parkway and McKinnon Street assuming 20-years of intersection operations to calculate lifecycle costs. Table 4 below summarizes the costs associated with each alternative.

Table 4: Performance Measure Summary

Benefit Performance Measure Summary
Safety
Figure 1: Lifecycle Cost of Safety
Preferred Alternative:

Based on the lowest predicted life-cycle cost
for safety, the preferred intersection control
type for this intersection is a roundabout. See
Appendix F for the Interactive Highway
Safety Design Manual (IHSDM)’s KABCO
values used for the safety analysis.

No-Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout
Annual Cost of Collisions $149,578 $206,261 $95,628
Discounted Life Cycle Cost of Collisions $2,128,120 $2,975,714 $1,380,111 No-Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout
Annual Quantity (hours) 10348 1936 2066
Annual Cost $128,990 $25,520 $27,331
Total Discounted Life Cycle Cost $2,708,784 $535,913 $573,947 No-Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout
Annual O&M Costs $300 $6,700 $2,833
Discounted Life Cycle O&M Costs $4,377 $97,755 $41,332
Discounted Pavement Rehab Costs $96,444 $96,444 $57,033 Total O&M Costs $100,821 $194,199 $98,365
No-Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout
High Approximation $0 $1,000,000 $2,000,000
Low Approximation $0 $850,000 $1,500,000
Average for Both Ramps $0 $925,000 $1,750,000

PERFORMANCE MEASURE LIFE CYCLE COST (NET PRESENT VALUE) Safety
Delay
Operations and Maintenance
Initial Capital
DRAFT ICE – Harden Parkway at McKinnon Street

Delay

Figure 2: Lifecycle Cost of Delay
Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on the lowest predicted lifecycle cost for delay, the preferred intersection control type for this
intersection is a traffic signal.

Cost Performance Measure Summary
Operations and Maintenance (O&M)

Figure 3: Lifecycle Cost of O&M
Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on lowest expected annual O&M
costs, the preferred intersection control type
for this intersection is a roundabout.

Initial Capital Costs
Figure 4: Initial Capital Costs
Preferred Alternative:

Of the two proposed alternatives, the traffic
signal would have a lower initial capital cost.

B/C ANALYSIS SUMMARY
B/C Ratio Scoring
The following equation illustrates the B/C ratio and Table 5 provides the description of B/C ratio scoring:

𝐁 𝐂⁄ Ratio Score =
∑ 𝐁𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐭 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬
∑ 𝐂𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬
Table 5: Description of B/C Ratio Scoring
B/C Ratio Score Description
B/C = 1.00 A B/C ratio of 1.00 is a neutral rating. This indicates that the ROI for existing signal is equal to improved signal/roundabout.

B/C < 1.00 A B/C ratio less than 1.00 indicates that the existing signal will provide a better ROI when compared to improved signal/roundabout.

B/C > 1.00 A B/C ratio greater than 1.00 indicates that improved signal/roundabout provides a better ROI when compared to the existing signal.

The B/C score is based on the net present value using a discount rate of 4% through the life-cycle duration of 20 years for each of the five performance measures.

Note: ROI=Return of Investment
DRAFT ICE – Harden Parkway at McKinnon Street

The summary results of the stage 1 B/C analysis at the study intersection are summarized in Table 6. The stage 1 B/C analysis compares the proposed signal and roundabout alternatives to the Existing AWSC. Both the traffic signal and the roundabout have B/C ratios greater than 1.0, which indicate that they are both cost-effective intersection control types when compared to the Existing AWSC.

Table 6: Summary of Life-Cycle B/C Analysis – Stage 1 B/C Ratios A second stage of the B/C analysis was performed to determine the preferred alternative intersection control type between the traffic signal and a roundabout. The stage 2 B/C analysis compares the roundabout to the traffic signal alternatives. The roundabout has a B/C ratio greater than 1.0, which indicates that the roundabout will have a greater ROI compared to the traffic signal. Table 7 shows a summary of the stage 2 B/C results.

Table 7: Summary of Life-Cycle B/C Analysis – Stage 2 B/C Ratios Added Benefits Compared to No-Build (AWSC) No-Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout Safety - $ (847,594) $ 748,008 $
Delay - $ 2,172,871 $ 2,134,838 $
Total Benefits $0 $1,325,277 $2,882,846
Added Cost Compared to Existing Conditions No-Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout O&M - $ 93,378 $ (2,456) $
Initial Capital - $ 925,000 $ 1,750,000 $
Total Costs $0 $1,018,378 $1,747,544
B/C Ratio Compared to Existing Conditions N/A 1.30 1.65 Total Costs ( C )
Total Benefits ( B )
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS
Added Benefits Compared to Signal Signal Roundabout
Safety - $ 1,595,602 $
Delay - $ (38,034) $
Total Benefits $0 $1,557,568
Added Cost Compared to Existing Conditions Signal Roundabout O&M - $ (95,834) $
Initial Capital - $ 825,000 $
Total Costs $0 $729,166
B/C Ratio Compared to Existing Conditions N/A 2.14
Total Costs ( C )
Total Benefits ( B )
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS
DRAFT ICE – Harden Parkway at McKinnon Street

Figure 5: Lifecycle Accumulated Costs

Figure 5 shows the accumulated costs of all four performance measures for the AWSC and each proposed alternative. The roundabout starts with the largest accumulated cost in year 2021 because of the high initial capital cost. However, because the roundabout has low safety, delay, and O&M costs, the accumulated cost for the roundabout is the lowest in year 2041. The roundabout and AWSC lines intersect near year 2034 (13 years) – this is when the roundabout would have a positive ROI that will continue to grow. The roundabout is the preferred intersection control type for the entire 20-year analysis time period.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
An analysis of the estimated benefit and cost performance measures indicate that, when forecast traffic volumes are considered for a minimum 20-year service life, a roundabout-controlled intersection is the preferred alternative at the intersection of Harden Parkway and McKinnon Street.  The Existing AWSC will have the longest delays and queue lengths out of all the intersection control alternatives at the study intersection.
 The traffic signal and roundabout would have similar operations.  The roundabout alternative has the lowest lifecycle societal cost on safety.  The Existing AWSC and the roundabout have similar lifecycle O&M costs.  Both the proposed traffic signal and roundabout would have a ROI compared to the Existing AWSC over the lifecycle of the intersection.
 The proposed roundabout would have a ROI compared to the proposed traffic signal over the lifecycle of the intersection.
 The City of Salinas will start to see a positive ROI from the roundabout after 13 years.

Appendix
Appendix A – Traffic Volumes
Appendix B – Existing AWSC Synchro Operational Analysis Appendix C –Traffic Signal Synchro Operational Analysis Appendix D – Roundabout SIDRA Operational Analysis
Appendix E – Description of Benefit Cost Performance Measures and Caltrans Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table
Appendix F – HSM Predictive Method Safety Analysis IHSDM KABCO Values $-
$1.0
$2.0
$3.0
$4.0
$5.0 Accumulated Cost ($ Million)
Year
Accumulated Costs Between Proposed Alternatives
No-Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout
Appendix D 427
McKinnon Bike and Pedestrian Counts Summary
CSU Monterey Bay Class: ENSTU 376
-
Summary Report of Bicycle & Pedestrian Counts for
Temporary Installations on
McKinnon Street & Westminster Drive, Salinas CA
Written by: Mollie Brogdon
June 24, 2022
Appendix D 428
Abstract
To ensure the safety for children and all community members in Monterey County, as part of the Salinas Safe Routes to School Program, The Transportation Agency for Monterey County installed temporary safety measures in front of Harden Middle School located in Salinas, CA. With help from the Sustainable City Year Program and CSUMB students, a study on the temporary installations was conducted to assess their effectiveness in increasing pedestrians and bicyclist traffic, as well as improving their overall safety. Each movement an individual made across the intersection of McKinnon Street and Westminster Drive was recorded during four designated days and time frames both before and after the temporary safety measures were installed. When it was observed, additional documentation concerning dangerous behavior was made. This study concluded that the temporary installations did increase the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians. However, pedestrians may still be subject to unsafe conditions due to the speed of vehicular traffic, and children bicyclists remain susceptible to injury from the lack of prevalent helmet use. Pedestrian activity had a notable increase following the installations, whereas bicyclist activity decreased. It was also found that the temporary installations did not encourage bicyclists to travel in the protected bike lanes. This study argues that an additional speed survey is necessary to better assess the severity of speeding in the area. Education on proper bike lane use for child bicyclists is also recommended. Finally, stronger enforcement of helmet use for minors is imperative. A program to connect the children with such safety gear is advised.

Appendix D 429
Background & Purpose
All children should be able to make their way to school safely. The Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) is working to ensure children's safety through various Safe Routes to School projects and programs across Monterey County. TAMC is aware that the majority of children in Monterey County are driven to school. This is one of the leading causes of traffic congestion on local roads during the morning and afternoon. This chaotic drop-off traffic in front of schools creates an unsafe environment for children who walk and bike. TAMC is making an effort to bring forth a community approach to achieving a deep and comprehensive impact for children's safety through the Safe Routes to School Program. One specific project that TAMC employed took place in front of Harden Middle School and was made possible through the Sustainable City Year Program. The Sustainable City Year Program is a connection made by universities and communities to assist with local needs. The program is intended to assist local municipalities with sustainability-related projects that they would like to take on but may not have the resources to do so. For this project, an Environmental Studies class focusing on infrastructure at California State University, Monterey Bay, collaborated with TAMC to collect bicycle and pedestrian count data and assess the effectiveness of the project.

The project in front of Harden Middle School was focused on the intersection of McKinnon Street and Westminster Drive, with the goal of getting feedback from the community and improving safety. TAMC added temporary curb extensions on Westminster Drive and changed bike lanes to protected bikeways with a barrier from cars on McKinnon Street.

Examples of these temporary installation are found below in Figure 1. To properly evaluate the effectiveness of these temporary measures, CSUMB students were tasked with counting the movements of pedestrians and bicyclists across the entire intersection. The counts were primarily intended to answer the following question: How do the temporary installations impact pedestrian Appendix D 430
and bicyclists’ behaviors? Questions of more specific interest include, Do the temporary installations improve safety for pedestrians? Do the temporary installations improve safety for bicyclists? Do the temporary installations encourage more pedestrian and bicyclist activity? Recording the activity within the intersections through pedestrian and bicyclist counts allowed for a comprehensive investigation to answer the questions of interest.

Figure 1. Temporary Bike Lane Separations on McKinnon Street Methodology
The counts were recorded by CSUMB students, whose role included observing and tallying the movements of pedestrians and bicyclists across the McKinnon and Westminster intersection. An example of how the intersection was labeled for the purpose of counting can be seen in Figure 2 below. These counts were taken from 7-9am and 2:30-4:30pm on Tuesday April 5th and Thursday April 7th before the installations. After the installation of the curb extensions and separate bikeways, counts were taken during the same time frames on Tuesday April 26th and Thursday April 28th.

During the counts, students recorded the number of individual movements people made at any of the four crossings, as well as turns they made on corners of the street. Counters specified if the pedestrians or bicyclists were adults or children, if the crossings were considered Appendix D 431
safe, if child bicyclists were wearing helmets or not, and if bicyclists were traveling on the sidewalk or street. A safe crossing was one in which a pedestrian or bicyclists used the designated pathways and did not have a dangerous interaction with the vehicular traffic.

Additional notes were recorded if dangerous or unusual behavior was observed. Counters also recorded the opinions and input from community members as well as teachers from Harden Middle School that approached them about the study. To account for other variables impacting the results, the temperature and weather conditions during each count were also documented.

Weather during every count was mild; no rain, extreme heat, cold, or wind was recorded. It is likely that the weather did not impact the results of this study.

Within the collected data, there is some information regarding bicyclists that is incomplete or was entered incorrectly. The data is concerned with helmet use by child bicyclists and if the bicyclists were traveling on the sidewalk or street. The findings and conclusions further explain in detail the impact of this on the study.

Figure 2. Labeled Intersection for Counting
Findings:

Appendix D 432
To gain a better understanding of the results of this project, an overview of three themes within the findings will be presented. These include results relating to pedestrians, bicyclists, and dangerous behaviors. These findings will relay comparative information and data from before and after the temporary installations.

Pedestrians
Figure 3 below displays several findings from the study. Within the graphs, categories of “In” signifies that the crossing took place within a designated pathway and that the crossing was considered safe from vehicular traffic. On the other hand, those that say “Out” indicate that the crossing took place outside of the crossway and was considered an unsafe crossing. “Before” signifies the count data prior to the installation of the temporary safety measures and “After” signifies the data that was collected following the installation of temporary street improvements.

Since the before and after counts for Tuesday and Thursday were generally comparable to each other, the data from the two days was compiled into sum totals.

As seen in the graphs, movements of children were far more frequent than adults at almost every crossing. In the morning, the most frequently crossed pathways were from 2→1 with 48 children inside the crosswalk before and 44 after, 3→4 with 13 children before and 21 after, 4→3 with 164 children before and 228 after, and 1→4 with 159 children before and 175 after. Likewise, in the evening, the most frequent crossings for children included: 1→2 with 40 before and 72 after, 2→1 with 63 before and 49 after, 3→4 with 307 before and 435 after, 4→3 with 35 before and 70 after, 1→4 with 19 before and 47 after, 4→1 with 215 before and 248 after, and finally Corner 2 where there were 44 turns before and 54 turns after the pop-ups.

The main pathways traveled by children are the crossings between locations 4 and 3 as well as the between locations 1 and 4. Both were traveled in high frequency in the morning and Appendix D 433
afternoon, just in the opposite direction. In the morning, children typically traveled sequentially from 1→4 then, from 4→3. In the afternoon, they typically travel from 3→4 then, from 4→1.

The graphs further demonstrate that there is more pedestrian traffic during the afternoons than there is in the mornings. Moreover, there are more children crossings that took place outside of the crosswalks during the afternoon. It is important to note that one of the most frequent crosswalks that children traveled outside of was 3→4 in the afternoon. This pathway is not an actual street crossing, but a sidewalk where the large bins were added as a barrier between the bike lane and the street. The data is unclear whether the pedestrians were traveling behind these bins in the bike lane, or in front of the bins in the street.

Appendix D 434
Figure 3. Pedestrian Count Graphs
Bicyclists
Similar to Figure 3, Figure 4 also displays compiled data from two data collection days to best showcase the findings. Figure 4 shows that in the mornings of the pre-counts, there were a total of 94 bicyclists. Within this, 40 were children, 38 of which, traveled on the sidewalk. In the afternoon of the pre-counts, there were 37 bicyclists. 22 out of the 37 bicyclists were children with 18 traveling on the sidewalks. After the temporary measures were installed, post-counts revealed that in the morning there were a total of 35 bicyclists. 28 of these bicyclists were children, with 25 of them traveling on sidewalks. Likewise, the afternoon post-counts totaled 49 bicyclists. Out of the 49 bicyclists, there were 41 children. The data that was collected during these time frames does not indicate whether these children traveled on the sidewalk or the street.

Cumulatively, Figure 5 reveals that there was a total of 131 bicyclist movements during the pre-count, and 84 bicyclist movements observed during the post-count. This is a 35.9% overall decrease in bicyclist traffic. In the mornings, bicyclist traffic decreased by 62.7%.

Appendix D 435
However, in the afternoon, bicyclist traffic increased by 32.4%. Overall, the number of bicyclists decreased following the installation of the temporary measures.

Lack of helmet use by children bicyclists proved to be a significant finding within the study. The data collected on helmet use may not be reflective of the precise percentage of children that wore helmets due to data entry errors. However, based on substantial observational data, it can be concluded that there were very few children who wore helmets. The vast majority of children bicyclists did not wear helmets. A change in the frequency of helmet use by children bicyclists was not observed following the installations.

Figure 4. Morning & Afternoon Counts of Bicyclists Graph Appendix D 436
Figure 5. Totals of Before & After Counts Graph
Dangerous Behaviors
Based on observational data collected during the study, vehicular traffic was a significant contributor to dangerous behaviors within the intersection. Prior to the installations, cars commonly pulled into the unprotected bike lanes on McKinnon Street to drop-off or pick-up children. Figure 6 below provides an example of this frequent occurrence. Following the installation of the temporary bike lane barriers, cars were no longer able to make this maneuver.

Instead, they then opted to park in the residential streets down Westminster Drive. These locations down Westminster became crowded and cars ended up blocking intersections, parking in front of driveways, and in fire lanes as they waited to pick their children up. One CSUMB student counter reported on the deeper implications that could arise as a result of vehicles blocking intersections:
“During [a post-count] count on Thursday April 28, multiple cars were parked, blocking the fire lanes where Westminster opens onto McKinnon (in the 1→2/2→1 crossing, see Figure 1). A few minutes later, I observed an ambulance and fire engine responding to a Appendix D 437
medical emergency on Tynan Court, which intersects Westminster near the count site. If those cars had been blocking the lanes, neither emergency vehicle would have been able to access the street without driving over a planted center divider and knocking over a sign. This is the only major drawback I can see with the installation: as parking opportunities are limited on McKinnon to create safer conditions for pedestrians, drivers are routed onto residential streets, causing potential issues for emergency and residential access to the neighborhood.

Granted, this problem only arises during school pickup hours, but it is still a concerning possibility.”
After the temporary installations were put in place, it was observed that the number of children who were dropped off in the morning within the intersection significantly decreased.

More specifically, there were fewer cars that stopped to drop off children in front of the crossing between locations 3 and 4. Prior to the installation, this was a popular spot for cars to stop and drop off children.

Another frequent dangerous behavior observation made by counters relates to the speed of vehicular traffic. Before and after the installations, multiple counters noted that the speed vehicles were traveling down McKinnon was a concern. Although the actual speed of vehicles was not recorded in the study, it was evident that they were traveling at a speed that was unsafe for pedestrians. One observation of particular importance deals with the crosswalk between locations 1 and 4. During the morning counts, both before and after the installations, it was recorded that a child was almost hit by a vehicle in the middle of this crosswalk. In both instances, the children had to make abrupt stops in the middle of the crossing to avoid being hit by a car.

Appendix D 438
Figure 6. Cars Parked in Bike Lane on McKinnon Street
Conclusions
The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the following questions: How do the temporary installations impact pedestrian and bicyclists’ behaviors? Do the temporary installations encourage more pedestrian and bicyclist activity? Do the temporary installations improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists?
It is concluded that overall pedestrian traffic increased following the addition of the temporary street improvements. Almost every route during the post-installation counts had a notable increase. It is also clear that the main routes traveled by children are the crossings between locations 4 and 3 as well as the crossing between locations 1 and 4. Both of these were traveled in high frequency in the morning and afternoon, just in the opposite direction. From this, it can be assumed that many children are being picked up in the same places that they are dropped off for school or that they live in the neighborhoods accessed by Westminster Drive. It was also observed that children traveled outside of the crosswalks more frequently in the afternoon than in the morning. This is likely a result of a rush of students being released from Appendix D 439
school at the same time and the resulting crowding on the sidewalks in front of Harden Middle School. Since the children are traveling outside of the pathways during these times, the bins that were set up in front of the 3→4 crossing are likely providing a necessary safety barrier to protect the child pedestrians from vehicular traffic.

This temporary barrier bins in front of locations 3 and 4 proved to be advantageous for bicyclists who utilize the bike lane as well. They actively assisted in inhibiting cars from entering and parking in the bike lane to drop-off or pick-up children. The bins, along with the other temporary installations that created protected bikeways, allows for bicyclists to safely travel in the bike lane without the risk of interference from vehicles. Despite the fact that the protected bikeways are making traveling in the bike lane safer, they did not encourage bicyclists to travel in the bike lanes themselves. Although it cannot be concluded with full certainty due to missing data during the afternoon post-counts on whether the bicyclists were traveling on or off the sidewalks, the data that is available during the morning counts indicates that there was no change in bicyclists traveling on the streets instead of the sidewalk. Bicyclists continued to travel on the sidewalks.

As it has been presented, there was an 35.9% overall decrease in bicyclist traffic following the instillations. In the mornings, there was a decrease of 62.7%. Only during the afternoon was there an 32.4% increase in bicyclists traffic following the installations.

Although the temporary installations were not created with the intention of improving this observation, one of the main concerns that became evident within the study is the lack of helmet use in child bicyclists. Very few, if any, children wore helmets while riding their bikes.

This is a significant safety risk for children.

An additional safety concern for both pedestrian and bicyclists is the speed of vehicular traffic on McKinnon Street. The installations did not appear to significantly lower the speed that Appendix D 440
vehicles are traveling. Pedestrians and bicyclists continue to be at risk from speeding cars. While this study reported only two “close-calls” events where children were almost struck by motorists in a designated crosswalk, other stakeholders such as Harden Middle School teachers, have reported that it is a common occurrence.

In all, the temporary installations did increase the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians by providing a safety barrier from motorists. However, pedestrians are still subject to unsafe conditions due to the speed of vehicular traffic, and children bicyclists remain susceptible to injury from the lack of prevalent helmet use. Pedestrian activity had a notable increase following the installations, whereas bicyclist activity decreased. The temporary installations did not encourage bicyclists to travel in the protected bike lanes.

Recommendations
To address the safety concerns that this study has uncovered, a few recommendations for infrastructure improvements and programming should be taken into consideration. First, to make a more accurate assessment on the speed of vehicular traffic within the area, an additional speed survey is recommended. Once the severity of speeding is recorded, it would allow for a better examination of pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Then, applicable recommendations on how to decrease the speed of traffic can be made.

An additional recommendation is to better educate child bicyclists on using the bike lanes.

Child bicyclists may not be aware that using sidewalks while traveling on bikes is unsafe and that the street bike lanes is where they should travel instead. Sufficient education on bicycle policies for children will enhance safety for all. It may also encourage more children to bike to school after they have had the opportunity to become more familiar and confident about biking.

Appendix D 441
However, if measures continue to be taken to encourage children to bike to school, helmet enforcement for children under the age of 18 must also take effect. Whether this be through actions Harden Middle School takes to regulate helmet use, through local law enforcement, or even through a program that allows children to gain access to safety gear such as helmets, intervention is necessary.

Appendix D 414















































 















































 












 

















 ­
€ ‚
ƒ
„
†‡ˆ
‰‡‰Š‡†‹Œ‚ 


Ž


‚
‘

’““



“Š















&LW\RI6DOLQDV0D[DU0LFURVRIW
:(670,167(5'5,9(
0&.,1121675((7
+$5'(10,''/(
6&+22/
$/9,1'5,9(
+$5'(13$5.:$< 















”














•



Ž
































”











–

‹Š–’†—



Ž

































































 















































 












 

















 ­
€ ‚
ƒ
„
†‡ˆ
‰‡‰Š‡†‹Œ‚ 


Ž


‚
‘

’““



“Š















&LW\RI6DOLQDV0D[DU0LFURVRIW
:(670,167(5'5,9(
0&.,1121675((7
+$5'(10,''/(
6&+22/
$/9,1'5,9(
+$5'(13$5.:$< 















”














•



Ž
































”











–

‹Š–’†—



Ž





























































































































 
























­€­
‚ƒ



„
†‡ˆ
‰‡‰‡†Š‹ƒ
­




Œ

Ž ƒ
‘









’
“””

•
”







’”















&LW\RI6DOLQDV0D[DU0LFURVRIW
:(670,167(5'5,9(
0&.,1121675((7
+$5'(10,''/(
6&+22/
$/9,1'5,9(
+$5'(13$5.:$<







–



•
Œ






—



˜



’


™
š


Œ

Ž 





—


›•










œ
































ž





ŠŸž“†¡





•
Œ



Œ

Ž 












Outreach Materials - Flier

APPENDIX D

MCKINNON STREET TEMPORARY DEMONSTRATION
Appendix D 415
Outreach Materials - Banner












 























































































































­
€ 











‚

Appendix D 416















































 
















































 













 








­



€















































































 ­
‚









ƒ










„ƒ






††



†
‡†



ˆ­‰ Š
‹ ‹‡ ‰ŒŽ

‘
’

























“








’







“








“












‘








”













€‚ƒ‚„ƒ












“















’

•
–


“


­

€



 




†





‡



†





–



“
































•



‡

 





 


ˆ

†‰









­

 Š
ƒ‹
­
„


“
•






ƒ




—








„ƒ

’





††



†
‡
†


“


ˆ­‰ Š
‹ ‹‡ ‰ŒŽ


















 








































































































 















­ 


































































­
€ 




‚ƒ


„




















€ 

†
‡

„
ˆ







‚ƒ
‰Š

„
‹




Œ


‰Š

„
Ž
‰Š


&LW\RI6DOLQDV0D[DU0LFURVRIW
:(670,167(5'5,9(
0&.,1121675((7
+$5'(10,''/(
6&+22/
$/9,1'5,9(
+$5'(13$5.:$<
†



‘



†

 ‰




’“
Ž



 ‰




‰Š







Outreach Materials - Mailer
Appendix D 417
How Can My Student Get to School During the Demonstration?1. Walk or Bike to School. Students are encouraged to walk or bike during the installation, and will be entered in a raffle to win prizes if they log their trips through the Move It Monterey County Challenge. Learn more at https://rb.gy/2pwefn

2. Drop-off in Church Parking Lot (5-minute walk). You can drop off or pick up students in the parking lot of the Church of Latter Day Saints, located at 255 E Alvin Dr. (see map above)

3. Drop-off Circle (15+ minutes): The drop-off circle will remain open but may take 15+ minutes to get through. If enough students walk or bike to school or are dropped off in the church parking lot, it will take less time to get through the drop-off loop.

Why Redesign McKinnon Street?The temporary installation is designed with students in mind. The project will include barriers between the bike lane and the motor vehicle lane, which makes it safer for students to bike to Harden Middle School and North Salinas High School.LEARN MORE:For more information, scan the QR codevisit https://saferoutesmonterey.org/planning-salinas, or call (831) 515-1364.

COMING SOON!Temporary Protected Walking and Biking InstallationAt McKinnon Street and Westminster DriveApril 20th – May 18th Possible Traffic ImpactsThe installation will include barriers between the bike lane and the motor vehicle lane, so you will not be able to drop-off or pick up students on McKinnon Street during the demonstration. This may cause additional traffic in the school drop-off loop. Thank you for your patience with any additional traffic during this project.

Maneras que su estudiante puede llegar a la escuela durante la demostración:1. Caminando o en bicicleta. Animamos a que estudiantes caminen o vayan a la escuela en bicicleta durante el mes de la demostración. Estudiantes que usen este método podrán grabar sus viajes a la escuela por medio del programa Move It Monterey County Challenge y participar en una rifa para ganarpremios. Para más informes puede ir a la página web https://rb.gy/2pwefn

2. Puede dejar su estudiante en el estacionamiento de la iglesia (requiere caminar al campo escolar que toma 5 minutos). Usted podrá dejar y recoger a su estudiante de la iglesia Church of Latter Day Saints, localizada en el 255 E. Alvin Dr. (refiera al mapa arriba)

3. Puede dejar su estudiante en el área de ascenso cerca del estacionamiento escolar (15+ minutos): El área de ascenso se mantendrá abierto durante la demostración, pero puede que le tome más de 15 minutos para usarla. Si suficientes estudiantes caminan o van a la escuela en bicicleta, o son dejados en el estacionamiento de la iglesia, puede ser que pasar por el área de ascenso sea más rápido. ¿Porque el rediseño de la calle McKinnon Street??La instalación temporal está diseñada con estudiantes en mente. El proyecto incluirá barreras entre las vías ciclistas y las vías de autos para aumentar la seguridad de estudiantes que andan en bicicleta hacia las escuelas Harden Middle y North Salinas High.

PARA MAS INFORMACION:Para más información, haga scan el código QR o visítenos en la página web: https://saferoutesmonterey.org/planningsalinas-spanish/, o llámenos al (831) 515-1364.

VIENE PRÓXIMAMENTEInstalación Temporal para Caminar y Andar en Bicicleta de Manera ProtegidaEn las calles McKinnon Street y Westminster Drive20 de April – 18 de Mayo Posible Impacto al TráficoNormalLa instalación incluirá barreras entre la víaciclista y la vía de autos, así que no seráposible parar para dejar o recoger a su estudiante sobre la calle McKinnon Street
durante el mes de demostración. Estopuede que cause tráfico adicional en el área de descenso a la par del estacionamiento
escolar. Le agradecemos su paciencia por el tráfico adicional durante este proyecto.

Outreach Materials - Drop-off Flier
Appendix D 418
Green means space
for biking
Barriers protect people
walking and biking from
cars
El cuadro verde es un
espacio para bicicletas.

Estas barreras protegen del trafico de carros a personas caminando o en bicicleta.

What do these colors mean? ¿Qué significan estos colores? https://saferoutesmonterey.org/planning-salinas
Temporary InstallationApril 20th – May 18thProtected Walking and Biking Installation Coming to McKinnon Street Proyecto Temporal
20 de Abril - 18 de Mayo
Instalación Para Caminar y Andar en Bicicleta de
Manera Protegida Viene a la Calle McKinnon
Outreach Materials - Poster
Appendix D 419
Social Media Graphic #2 English
Social Media Graphic #1 English
Social Media Graphic #2 Spanish
Social Media Graphic #1 Spanish
Appendix D 420
McKinnon Street Temporary Installation
Participant Survey
Encuesta para Participante sobre la
Instalación Temporal en la Calle McKinnon

1. How did you experience the temporary installation? Select all that apply/ ¿Cómo uso el espacio de instalación temporal? Selección todas las respuestas que se aplica para usted.

Walking / caminando
Biking / por bicicleta
Driving / manejando

2. How would you describe your experience using this space? For each feature, place a check in the box that best describes your experience. / ¿Cómo calificaría su experiencia usando este espacio? Por favor indique cómo se siento con cada una de las instalaciones en la siguiente lista. Para cada instalación indique la casilla que mejor describa su experiencia.
a. Curb extension / Extensión de acera/banqueta
I love it / Me encanto
I like it / Me gusto
I’m neutral / Neutral
I don’t like it/ No me gusto
I hate it / No me gusto para nada
I did not use it/ No la use
McKinnon Survey
Appendix D 421
b. Protected bicycle lanes / Instalación ciclista con barrera protejida I love it / Me encanto
I like it / Me gusto
I’m neutral / Neutral
I don’t like it/ No me gusto
I hate it / No me gusto para nada
I did not use it/ No la use

3. Did you walk or bike more because of the temporary installation? / ¿Caminó o anduvo en bicicleta usted más ahora porque está la instalación temporal? Yes / Si
No / No

4. Would you like to see the temporary improvements made permanent? / ¿Le gustaría ver estos mejoramientos temporales convertidas a instalaciones permanentes? Yes / Si
No / No
Undecided/Indeciso(a)
Maybe – with some changes / Tal vez – con ciertos cambios

5. How likely would you be to walk or bike through this area if the changes became permanent? / ¿Cuál sería la probabilidad que usted usaría esta instalaciones para andar en bicicleta o caminar si estos cambios se hicieran permanentes? Not at all likely / No usaría este espacio para nada
Not likely / Pienso que no lo usaría
Likely / Pienso que si lo usaría
Definitely / Definitivamente lo usaría

6. What is your favorite part about the temporary installation? / ¿Cuál es su parte favorita de la instalación temporal?
Appendix D 422

7. What would you change about the temporary installation? / ¿Que sería una cosa que cambiaría de la instalación temporal?

8. Have you ever felt unsafe walking or riding a bike at the intersection of Harden Parkway and McKinnon Street? / ¿Alguna vez se ha sentido inseguro al caminar o andar en bicicleta en la intersección de Harden Parkway y McKinnon St?

9. Please describe any traffic incidents you've seen (near misses) or of which you have heard about involving people walking, biking, or driving at the intersection of Harden Parkway and McKinnon Street. / Describa cualquier incidente de tráfico que haya visto (casi accidentes) o de los que haya oído hablar de personas que caminan, andan en bicicleta o conducen en la intersección de Harden Parkway y McKinnon Street.

10. Do you have any additional comments? / ¿Tiene algún otro comentario adicional? Optional Questions / Preguntas Opcionales:

1. Do you have a child or children that attend any of the following schools? (select all that apply) / ¿Tiene usted estudiantes que van a las siguientes escuelas? (seleccione todas que apliquen):

Harden Middle
North Salinas High
Natividad Elementary
McKinnon Elementary
No
Appendix D 423

2. What is your ZIP code? / Indique su código postal.
93905
93906
93907
93901
93908
Other / Otro: __________

3. What is your age? / Marque la casilla que indique su edad.

Under 18 / Menos de 18
18 – 35
36 – 50
51 – 65
65+

4. What is your gender? / ¿Cuál es su género?
Man/ hombre
Woman/ mujer
Other/otro
Prefer not to say / prefiero no decir

5. What is your race/ethnicity? / Cuál es su raza/etnicidad? Black/African American / Afro Americano
Hispanic/Latinx / Hispano/Latinx
White/Caucasian / Blanco/Anglo
Asian / Asiático
Native American / Americano Nativo
Mixed ethnicity / Etnicidad mixta
Other / Otra
Prefer not to say / Prefiero no decir

6. We are raffling off two bicycles for survey respondents! If you would like to enter the raffle, enter your name and contact info (phone number or email) below. / ¡Estaremos sorteando dos bicicletas para participantes de esta encuesta! Si le gustaría participar, incluya su nombre y número de teléfono o email en el área abajo.

Thank you for your participation!! / ¡Gracias por su participación! Appendix D 424
DĐ<ŝŶŶŽŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚdĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJ/ŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶ^ƵƌǀĞLJZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞƐ ϭϳй
ϯϮй
ϱϭй
Ϭй
ϭϬй
ϮϬй
ϯϬй
ϰϬй
ϱϬй
ϲϬй
tĂůŬŝŶŐ ŝŬŝŶŐ ƌŝǀŝŶŐ
Yϭ͗,ŽǁĚŝĚLJŽƵĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞƚŚĞƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJ
ŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶͲ ^ĞůĞĐƚĂůůƚŚĂƚĂƉƉůLJ
ϵϳ
ϭϬϯ
ϱϵ
ϲϭ
ϯϮ
Ϯϰ
ϭϴ
ϭϱ
ϮϮ
ϯϮ
Ϭй ϮϬй ϰϬй ϲϬй ϴϬй ϭϬϬй
Ϯď͘ƵĨĨĞƌĞĚŝŬĞ>ĂŶĞ
ϮĂ͘,ŝŐŚͲsŝƐŝďŝůŝƚLJƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬ
YϮ͘,ŽǁǁŽƵůĚLJŽƵĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞLJŽƵƌĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ
ƵƐŝŶŐƚŚŝƐƐƉĂĐĞ͍ŚĞĐŬƚŚĞďŽdžƚŚĂƚďĞƐƚ
ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞƐLJŽƵƌĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͘
/ůŽǀĞŝƚ /ůŝŬĞŝƚ /ΖŵŶĞƵƚƌĂů /ĚŽŶΖƚůŝŬĞŝƚ /ŚĂƚĞŝƚ ϱϰй
ϰϲй
Yϯ͘ŝĚLJŽƵǁĂůŬŽƌďŝŬĞŵŽƌĞďĞĐĂƵƐĞŽĨƚŚĞ
ƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶ͍
EŽ zĞƐ
McKinnon Survey Responses
Appendix D 425
Yϰ͘tŽƵůĚLJŽƵůŝŬĞƚŽƐĞĞƚŚĞƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJ
ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐŵĂĚĞƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚ͍
EŽ DĂLJďĞͲǁŝƚŚƐŽŵĞĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ hŶĚĞĐŝĚĞĚ zĞƐ
Ϯϳй
ϯϳй
ϭϴй
ϭϴй
Yϱ͘,ŽǁůŝŬĞůLJǁŽƵůĚLJŽƵďĞƚŽǁĂůŬŽƌďŝŬĞ
ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚŝƐĂƌĞĂŝĨƚŚĞĐŚĂŶŐĞƐďĞĐĂŵĞ
ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚ͍
ĞĨŝŶŝƚĞůLJ >ŝŬĞůLJ EŽƚĂƚĂůůůŝŬĞůLJ EŽƚůŝŬĞůLJ
ϰϰй Ϯϭй Ϯй Ϯй Ϯϳй
Ϭй
ϭϬй
ϮϬй
ϯϬй
ϰϬй
ϱϬй
ϲϬй
ϳϬй
,ĂƌĚĞŶDŝĚĚůĞ
^ĐŚŽŽů
EŽƌƚŚ^ĂůŝŶĂƐ
,ŝŐŚ
EĂƚŝǀŝĚĂĚ

ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ
DĐŬŝŶŶŽŶ

ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ
EŽ
Yϲ͘ŽLJŽƵŚĂǀĞĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶŝŶƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ
ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͍ŚĞĐŬĂůůƚŚĂƚĂƉƉůLJ͘
Appendix D 426
ϯϲй
Ϯϱй
Ϯϳй
ϭϬй Ϯй
Yϳ͘tŚĂƚŝƐLJŽƵƌĂŐĞ͍
hŶĚĞƌϭϴ ϭϴͲϯϱ ϯϲͲϱϬ ϱϭͲϲϱ ϲϱн
ϯϱй
ϲϰй
ϭй
Yϴ͘tŚĂƚŝƐLJŽƵƌŐĞŶĚĞƌ͍
DĂŶ tŽŵĂŶ EŽŶͲďŝŶĂƌLJ
ϰй ϯй
ϲϵй
ϳй
Ϯйϭй
ϭϰй
Yϵ͘tŚĂƚŝƐLJŽƵƌƌĂĐĞͬĞƚŚŶŝĐŝƚLJ͍
ƐŝĂŶ ůĂĐŬͬĨƌŝĐĂŶŵĞƌŝĐĂŶ ,ŝƐƉĂŶŝĐͬ>ĂƚŝŶdž
DŝdžĞĚ
ƚŚŶŝĐŝƚLJ EĂƚŝǀĞŵĞƌŝĐĂŶ KƚŚĞƌ
tŚŝƚĞͬĂƵĐĂƐŝĂŶ
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#23-302, Version: 1
Display of Commemorative Flag - Progress Pride Flag
Approve a Resolution authorizing the display of a commemorative Progress Pride Flag at City Hall from June 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/10/2023
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 16, 2023
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
FROM: PATRICIA M. BARAJAS, CITY CLERK
TITLE: DISPLAY OF COMMEMORATIVE FLAG – PROGRESS PRIDE
FLAG
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing the display of a commemorative Progress Pride Flag at City Hall from June 1, 2023, thru June 30, 2023.

RECOMMENDATION:

Consider approval of a Resolution authorizing the display of a commemorative Progress Pride Flag at City Hall from June 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023, in accordance with the City’s Administrative Memorandum 70-05.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City of Salinas established Administrative Memorandum 70-05, Display of Federal, State, City and Ceremonial Flags at City Building on April 15, 1970. The Memorandum was updated in 1983, 2004 and 2021 to conform with Federal and State statues. The current policy requires approval of a Resolution of the City Council in order to display commemorative flags on City flagpoles. In keeping with past practice, the City Council is asked to consider authorization to raise the Progress Pride Flag during the month of June.

BACKGROUND:

The Stonewall Riots or Stonewall Rebellion in New York are considered the catalyst for the LGBTQ+ civil rights movement in the United States. The month of June is annually celebrated as LGBT Pride month to coincide with the anniversary of the Stonewall Riots. This is the second request the city has received to display a commemorative flag at a City facility. Administrative Memorandum 70-05 established clear guidelines on the display of commemorative flags at City Hall given First Amendment concerns. The Memorandum also states that City flagpoles are not intended to be a forum for free expression by the public. Display of the Progress Pride Flag at City Hall during the month of June must be considered and approved by Resolution of the City Council.

Page | 2
CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Approval and display of a commemorative Progress Pride Flag supports the City Council’s Strategic Goal of Effective and Culturally Responsive Government by promoting diversity, equity and inclusion.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The display of the Progress Flag requires coordination with the Public Works and Administration respectively to accommodate the display in accordance with the City’s policy. Additionally, there is ongoing coordination with the Community Relations Manager to promote and commemorate the raising of the flag on June 1, 2023.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

No fiscal impact associated with this action.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Flag Policy
Page | 3
RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DISPLAY OF A COMMEMORATIVE
PROGRESS PRIDE FLAG AT CITY HALL FROM JUNE 1, 2022, TO JUNE 30, 2022 WHEREAS, of Salinas established Administrative Memorandum 70-05, Display of Federal, State, City and Ceremonial Flags at City Building on April 15, 1970; and WHEREAS, the current Administrative Memorandum updated in 2021 requires approval of a Resolution of the City Council in order to display commemorative flags on City flagpoles; and
WHEREAS, the Salinas City Council wishes to commemorate the anniversary of the Stonewall Riots or Stonewall Rebellion which inspired the movement for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Transgender (LGBT) civil rights in the United States; and WHEREAS, the display of the Progress Pride Flag, serves to express the City’s official commemoration of this important event in U.S. History and its commitment to celebrating diversity.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby authorizes and supports the display of the commemorative Progress Pride Flag on the City flagpole located in front of City Hall from June 1 to June 30, 2023 in accordance with Administrative Memorandum 70-05.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of May 2021, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
______________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Memorandum
City of Salinus
Date: August 11,2021
To: DepartrnentDirectors
From: Steven s C^r"e^t41.r/
City Manager - Steven S. Carrigan
Assistant City Manager - Jim Pia
Eslefania Vargas
Public Works David Jacobs
Crissy English-While
Hang pham
Bren Godown
Community Development - Megan Hunter
Denise Ledezma
Maira Flores-Nunez
Liblary and Community Services - Krislan Lundquist
Trisha Meraz
Fire Chief Michele Vaughn
HumanResources MarinaHo(a-Gallegos
Finance MarI( Roberts
City Clerk Patricia Barajas
Elizaberh Soto
City Attomey's Office Christopher A. Callihan
Krystal Lazcano
Police - ChiefAdele Frese
Assistant Chief Rob€fl o Filice
ManhaGuizar
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVEMEMORANDUMTO-05
DISPLAY OF FEDERAL, STATf,, CITY AND CEREMONIAL FLAGS AT CITY BUILDINGS Please find the attached Administrative Memorandum, which is now in force and is to be included in your department Administrative Memo Manual.

Ifyou have any questions regarding this policy, contact the Administration Department. cc: Airport
Administration
City Clerk
Community Development
Finance
Fire
Human Resources
City Attomey
Library and Community Services
Police
Public Works
Page l I
ADMINISI'RATIVE MEMORANDUM 70-05
(Updated 08/19/83)
(Updated 09/29104)
(Updated 08/l I /2021)
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 15. 1970
SUBJECT: DISPLAY OF FEDERAL, STATE, CITY AND CEREMONIAL

FLAGS AT CITY BUILDINGS
(Responsible Department - Administration)
The purpose of this memorandum is to establish official City policy for display of the Federal, State, City, and ceremonia[ or commemorative flags at various City buildings and to provide guidance for display ol flags.

It is mandatory upon all agencies and departments of the City of Salinas to pay proper respect to the United States colors and to render it the courtesies to which it is entitled.

The City's flagpoles are not intended to be a forum for free expression by the public. The City will not display a commemorative flag based on a request from a third party, nor will the City use its flagpoles to sponsor the expression of a third party.

PROCEDTJRE:

Flags shall be displayed in conformance with Federal and State statutes, including Title 4 Chapter I of the United States Code and Sections 430 through 439 of Califomia Govemment Code.

The Administration Department will notifi staff responsible for the lowering or raising of flags by email when a proclamation or order is issued, or the flag is to be raised or lowered for a designated period. City Departments are responsible for the display of flags at their respective buitdings and facilities.

The flag will be flown at City Hall, City buildings and specified City parks every day from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. except during inclement weather. Illuminated flags may be displayed 24 hours a day.

A. POWMIA Flags
The Prisoner of War or Missing in Action (POWA4IA) flag, a nationally recognized flag by an act of Congress through the adoption of U.S. Public Law 101-355 to represent the "Nation's concem and commitment to resolving as fully as possible the fates of Americans still prisoner, missing and unaccounted for in Southeast Asia." Page | 2
PI,IRPOSE:

POLICY:

2. The POW,TN,IIA flag shall be displayed annually at City Hall on the following days; Armed Forces Day - 3'd Saturday in May
Memorial Day - Last Monday in May
Flag Day - June 14
Independence Day - July 4
National POW\{IA Recognition Day - 3'd Friday in September Veterans Day - November 1 I
B. City Flag

1. The City flag may be displayed or flown at a commercial or retail establishment within the city and is deemed permissible by the Salinas Municipal Code.

2. The City Manager and City Clerk may jointly authorize other uses upon finding of public purpose directly connected with official business of the city.

3. The City flag shall not be used for any political campaign or political activity.

C. CeremoniaVCommemorative Flags
l. Ceremonial or commemorative flags may be displayed as an expression of the City's official sentiments, consistent with the City's value.

2. Any such authorization shall be given at a duly noticed meeting at the request ofa member ofthe Council and by approval ofa resolution ofthe City Council.

3. Shall only be displayed on the flagpole located at City Hall for period that is reasonable or customary for the subject that is to be commemorated, but no longer than one month.

D. Display at Half-Staff
The United States flag shall be flown at half-staff on the following designated days in accordance with Federal law:
ll.

I t1.

IV
Peace Officer Memorial Day - May 15
Memorial Day - Last Monday in May
Patriot Day - September I 1
National Firefrghters Memorial Day - Designated day in October Pearl Harbor Remembrance Dav - December 7
Page I 3

2. The flags shall be flown at half-staff by order of the President of the United States or by the Govemor of the State of Califomia. On occasion, the City Manager of the City of Salinas, may direct the flag to be flown at half-staff.

3. The City of Salinas will lower the United States flag to half-staff in observance of the following occasions:

Upon the death of an active member of a Police Department or Fire Department who was killed in the line of duty, from the time of death until interment.
t1. Upon the death ofan active City employee killed in the line ol duty, from the time of death until interment.
ll1. Upon the death ofany present City ofSalinas elected official, from the time of death until interment.

E. Respect for Flag

1. When the national, State or POWMIA flags are in such condition (faded, tom, soiled, or frayed) that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, it should be replaced with a new flag.

2. Unserviceable United States flags shall be retired and destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by buming and in accordance with the U.S. Flag Code.

3. Requisition ofnew flags shall be the responsibility ofeach department.