THE
PAUL DAVIS
PARTNERSHIP, LLP
ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS
July 26, 2023
Planning Department
City of Salinas
Re: CHISPA, lnc./St. George Senior Housing-98 Kip Drive Subj: Density Bonus, Concessions & Waiver Requests as a Development Incentive.
The City of Salinas allows for exceptions to building development regulations in Sec. 17-18. -Waiver.
We request the following:
Useable Open Space Table 37-30.80
This Code Section requires 500 sf/unit of open space for multi-family projects. We request a variance for less than the minimum required open space.
• This is a 100% affordable senior housing project.
• The proposed project has 3,172 sf of open space and 1,728 sf of private open spaces for a total of 4,900 sf total open space. The minimum required is 19,500 sf. • Since the open space minimum is a required for a multi-family project, we ask for a 75% reduction in open space requirements based on the tenant type and their passive use of open space.
Density Section Bonus 37-50.060
This code section 37-30.150(j)(1} calls for a maximum of 24 units per acre. The proposed project is at 43 units per acre. We request a density bonus based on:
• An allowable request of a 100% density bonus for Affordable Senior Housing as per Zoning Code Section 37-50.060. It is proposed that 35 of the 36 residential units will be affordable. Per Section 37-30.lS0(j)(l), the maximum net density without a density bonus is 24 dwelling units to the acre. The project site consists of .85 acres, which would allow for a maximum of 21 dwelling units onsite without a density bonus (.85 x 24). Using the calculations for a 100% density bonus for affordable senior housing per Zoning Code Section 37-50.060, the maximum number of units with a density bonus is 36 units. The proposed number of 36 units is within the maximum allowed with a 100% density bonus.
Parking Density Reduction 37-50.370
Sec. 37-50.370. Reduction of required number of parking and loading spaces. (a)Reductions Allowed by the City Planner. The city planner may consider a reduction from zero to a maximum of twenty percent subject to the approval of a site plan review and a reduction of greater than twenty percent to a maximum of thirty percent subject to the approval of an administrative conditional use permit of the number of parking and loading spaces required by Schedules A and Bin Section 37-50.360: Off-street parking and loading spaces regulations if the city planner determines/finds any of the following conditions exist:
{2} The use or activity is participating in a facilities trip reduction plan in accordance with Section 37-50.330:
Vehicle trip reduction;
(4) Survey or other data exists which supports a reduction in parking and loading spaces for uses which, by their nature, are not likely to be converted to another use with greater parking requirements . .,._ t~~ ff.'J t~ ·• · · ~ilJ .. . •. ~ ·-I D .-
The Paul Davis Partnership, LLP i:X'··'@' E:~-,; ,, n L--,~. f.'-' ~.J.). 286 El Dorado Street ·l ,:'.' ti1 ~ ~~ F '\;,\1 1;~ij gl} Monterey, CA 93940 · ' I l:Zl ~ ~~ .ii-} &~ {
831-373-2784 Fax: 831-373-7459 ~ tnl
Per items 2 & 4: We would like to formally request a reduction of parking at St. George Senior Housing.
According to parking counts at 3 other CHISPA senior projects in Salinas, the number of cars per unit ranges from 35% to 52%. St. George is designed with 31 spaces for 36 units. The required number of spaces is 36 spaces. Therefore, we are requesting a 14% reduction in the amount of parking spaces required.
Please call me with any questions you have with our request.
Sincerely,
Paul W. Davis AIA
Architect
CA License C-15182
,h
The Paul Davis Partnership, LLP
286 El Dorado Street
Monterey, CA 93940
831-373-2784 Fax: 831-373-7459
I,
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive
Salinas, California
APN: 261-661-011-000
For:
CRISP A, Inc.
295 Main Street, Suite 100
Salinas, California 93901
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
1100 Main Street, .,Suite A, Watsonville, California 95076 • (831) 724-5868 CRISP A, Inc.
295 Main Street, Suite 100
Salinas, California 93901
ATTN: Dana Cleary
SUBJECT: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
APN: 261-661-011-000
Dear Ms. Cleaiy:
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
In accordance with your authorization, we have completed a geotechnical investigation for the proposed senior housing apartments at 98 Kip Drive in Salinas, California. This report summarizes the findings, conclusions, and recommendations from our field exploration, laborat01y testing, and engineering analysis. The conclusions and recommendations included herein are based upon applicable standards at the time this repo1t was prepared.
It is a pleasure being associated with you on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely,
ROCK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
Signed: September 1, 2022
Dusty M. Osburn, P .E.
Senior Engineer
R.C.E. 85113
Distribution: (4) Addressee and via email
(1) Paul W. Davis via email
(1) Andy Hunter via email
1100 Main Street, Suite A, Watsonville, California 95076 • (831) 724-5868 • Email: [email protected]
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 1
1.1 Purpose .......................................................... 1
1.2 Proposed Development .............................................. 1
1.3 Scope of Services .................................................. 1
1.4 Authorization ..................................................... 2
1.5 Exclusions ........................................................ 2 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM ......... 2 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................... 2
3.1 Location ......................................................... 2 3 .2 Surface Conditions ................................................. 2
3.3 Subsurface Conditions .............................................. 2 GEOTECHNICAL HAZARDS ............................................ 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................. 4
5.1 General .......................................................... 4 5 .2 Grading .......................................................... 5
5.2.1 General .................................................... 5
5.2.2 Site Clearing ................................................ 5
5.2.3 Excavating Conditions ........................................ 6
5.2.4 Fill Material ................................................ 6
5.2.5 Fill Placement and Compaction ................................. 6 5 .2.6 Preparation of On-Site Soils .................................... 7
5.2.7 Groundwater Table ........................................... 8
5.2.8 Expansive Soils .............................................. 8
5.2.9 Sulfate Content .............................................. 8
5.2.10 Surface Drainage ............................................. 8
5.2.11 Utility Trenches .............................................. 9
5.3 Foundations ...................................................... 10
5.3.1 General ................................................... 10
5.3.2 Conventional Shallow Foundations ............................. 10
5.4 Settlements ...................................................... 11
5.5 Retaining Structures ............................................... 11
5.5.1 General ................................................... 11
5.5.2 Lateral Earth Pressures ....................................... 11
5.5.3 Backfill ................................................... 12
5.5.4 Backfill Drainage ........................................... 12
5.6 Slabs-on-Grade ................................................... 13
5.7 Preliminaiy Pavement Design ........................................ 14
6. LIMITATIONS ........................................................ 16 REFERENCES ............................................................... 17 APPENDIX A ................................................................ 18 Geotechnical Investigation Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 1.2
Purpose
The purpose of our investigation is to provide preliminary geotechnical design parameters and recommendations for development of the site. Conclusions and recommendations related to site grading, foundations, slabs-on-grade, and retaining structures are presented herein.
Proposed Development
a. Based on our conversations with you, it is our understanding that the project consists of the construction of a 3 story building with 49 apartment units at the subject site.
b. Anticipated construction consists of standard light frame construction with raised wood or slab-on-grade floors. Exact wall, column, and foundation loads are unavailable, but are expected to be typical of such construction. c. Final grading and foundation plans were unavailable at the time of this report.
It is our understanding that the information obtained during our investigation will be used in the development of a finalized plan set. d. Also anticipated, are the construction of an attendant parking, drainage systems and associated landscaping improvements.
1.3 Scope of Services
The scope of services provided during the course of our investigation included:
a. Review of the referenced geotechnical, geologic, and seismological reports and maps pertinent to the development of the site (available in our files). b. Field exploration consisting of 7 borings, drilled to depths between 6. 5 and
21.5 feet below existing grade in the area of the proposed development. c. Logging and sampling of the borings by our Field Engineer, including the collection of soil samples for laboratory testing.
d. Laboratory testing of soil samples considered representative of subsurface conditions.
e. Geo technical analyses of field and laboratory data. f. Preparation of a report ( 4 copies) presenting our findings, conclusions and recommendations.
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
1.4 Authorization
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
This investigation, as outlined in our Proposal dated May 13, 2022, was performed in accordance with your written authorization on May 20, 2022.
1.5 Exclusions
Our services on this project are limited to the proposed senior housing apartments.
Our services specifically exclude all existing improvements to the site.
2. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
Details of the field exploration and laboratory testing are presented in Appendix A.
3. SITE DESCRIPTION
3 .1 Location
The subject project is located at 98 Kip Drive, in Salinas, Monterey County, California. The location is shown on the Location Map, Figure 1. 3 .2 Surface Conditions
The subject site is approximately 2.2 acres in size and rectangular in shape. The west side of the site is developed with an existing church and associated structures. The east side of the parcel is relatively level, is currently clear of all development and vegetated with wild grasses and a tree. Based on our review of the proposed plan, it is our understanding that the parcel will be split into two parcels in association with this project and the proposed apartments will be located on the east undeveloped portion.
3.3 Subsurface Conditions
a. Based on our review of the Geologic Map of the Natividad Quadrangle, Monterey County, California (Reference 5), the site is mapped as Older Surficial Settlements (Qoa). These deposits are described as dissected older alluvium. The results of our field exploration indicate that the subsurface soils present are consistent with the mapped geologic unit. b. Groundwater was not encountered during the course of our field exploration.
c. The subsurface profile generally consists of dark grayish to yellowish brown sandy clay. The sandy clay was observed from the surface to the extent of our borings at 21.5 feet below existing grade. This material is generally moist, firm to hard, and slightly plastic to plastic.
~
ot to Scale REFERENCE 4: Monterey County Parcel Report Web App Iff!gcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
' 98 Kip Ddve, SaHaas . I
I LOCATION MAP II FIGURE I
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
d. Complete soil profiles are presented on the Logs of Exploratory Borings and the boring locations are shown on the Boring Location Plan in Appendix A.
4. GEOTECHNICAL HAZARDS
a. Potential geotechnical hazards to man made structures include ground shaking, surface rupture, landsliding, liquefaction, lateral spreading, and differential compaction. The potential for each of these to impact the site is discussed below. b. Ground shaking caused by earthquakes is a complex phenomenon. Structural damage can result from the transmission of earthquake vibrations from the ground into the structure. The intensity of an earthquake at any given site depends on many variables including, the proximity of the site to the hypocenter, and the characteristics of the underlying soil and/or rock. The subject site is situated at the approximate latitude of36. 7063 ° and longitude -121.6431 °. The project location (latitude and longitude) were used in conjunction with the American Society of Civil Engineers website (Reference 1) to obtain the seismic design parameters presented in Table 1. All proposed structures at the subject site shall be designed with the corresponding seismic design parameters in accordance with the 2019 California Building Code (Reference 2).
Table 1: 2019 CBC Seismic Design Criteria
Site Seismic Spectral Response Accelerations
Class Design
Category Ss S1 FA Fv SMS SMI Sos SDI
D D 1.917 0.667 1.0 1.7* 1.917 ** 1.278 **
* See ASCE 7-16, Section 11.4.8. This value ofFv shall be used only for calculation ofT5• **See ASCE 7-16, Section 11.4.8.
c. Surface rupture usually occurs along lines of previous faulting. Based on our review of the County of Monterey Geologic Hazards Map (Reference 3 ), no faults are shown to cross the property. Therefore, the potential for surface rupture should be considered low.
d. Landslides are generally mass movements ofloose rock and soil, both dry and water saturated, and usually gravity driven. Based on our review of the County of Monterey Geologic Hazards Map (Reference 3), the subject parcel is mapped in an area oflow susceptibility for landslides. In addition, the subject site is relatively level, therefore, the potential for landsliding to occur across the site and cause damage to structures should be considered low.
Geotechnical Investigation Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
e. Liquefaction, lateral spreading, and differential compaction tend to occur in loose, unconsolidated, noncohesive soils with shallow groundwater. Based on our review of County of Monterey Geologic Hazards Map (Reference 3) the site is mapped in an area oflow susceptibility for liquefaction. Our field observations confirm that the potential for these hazards to occur should be considered low, due to the presence of relatively dense, cohesive soils and the lack of a shallow groundwater table.
5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 General
a. Based on the results of our investigation, it is our opinion that from the geotechnical standpoint, the subject site will be suitable for the proposed development provided the recommendations presented herein are implemented during grading and construction.
b. It is our opinion that the subject site will be suitable for the support of the proposed structure on a foundation system composed of conventional, shallow, continuous and pad footings. Recommendations for this foundation system are provided in Section 5.3, Foundations. c. Site preparation, consisting of over excavation and recompaction of the native subgrade will be required prior to placement of shallow foundations, slabs-on-grade, and pavements. See Section 5.2.6 for Preparation of On-Site Soils recommendations.
d. At the time we prepared this report, grading and foundation plans had not been finalized. We request an opportunity to review these plans during the design stages to determine if supplemental recommendations will be necessary.
e. The design recommendations of this report must be reviewed during the grading phase when subsurface conditions in the excavations become exposed.
f. Field observation and testing must be provided by a representative of Rock Solid Engineering, Inc., to enable them to form an opinion regarding the adequacy of the site preparation, and the extent to which the earthwork is performed in accordance with the geotechnical conditions present, the requirements of the regulating agencies, the project specifications and the recommendations presented in this report. Any earthwork performed in connection with the subject project without the full knowledge of, and not under the direct observation of Rock Solid Engineering, Inc., the Geotechnical Consultant, will render the recommendations of this report invalid.
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
g. The Geotechnical Consultant should be notified at least five (5) working days prior to any site clearing or other earthwork operations on the subject project in order to observe the stripping and disposal of unsuitable materials and to ensure coordination with the grading contractor. During this period, a preconstruction conference should be held on the site to discuss project specifications, observation/testing requirements and responsibilities, and scheduling. This conference should include at least the Grading Contractor, the Architect, and the Geotechnical Consultant.
5.2 Grading
5.2.1 General
All grading and earthwork should be performed in accordance with the recommendations presented herein and the requirements of the regulating agencies.
5.2.2 Site Clearing
a. Prior to grading, the areas to be developed for struch1res, pavements and other improvements, should be stripped of any vegetation and cleared of any surface or subsurface obstructions, including any existing foundations, utility lines, basements, septic tanks, pavements, stockpiled fills, and miscellaneous debris.
b. All pipelines encountered during grading should be relocated as necessary to be completely removed from construction areas or be capped and plugged according to applicable code requirements. c. Any wells encountered shall be capped in accordance with the local health department requirements. The strength of the cap shall be at least equal to the adjacent soil and shall not be located within 5 feet of any structural element.
d. Surface vegetation and organically contaminated topsoil should be removed from areas to be graded. The required depth of stripping will vary with the time of year the work is done and must be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant. It is generally anticipated that the required depth of stripping will be 6 to 12 inches.
e. Holes resulting from the removal of buried obstructions that extend below finished site grades should be backfilled with compacted engineered fill per Section 5.2.5.
Geoteclmical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
5.2.3 Excavating Conditions
a. We anticipate that excavation of the on-site soils may be accomplished with standard earthmoving and trenching equipment. b. Groundwater was not encountered during the course of our field exploration is not expected to present a problem during construction. c. Although not anticipated, any excavations adjacent to existing structures should be reviewed, and recommendations obtained to prevent undermining or distress to these structures.
5.2.4 Fill Material
a. The on-site soils may be used as compacted fill.
b. All soils, both on-site and imported, to be used as fill, should contain less than 3% organics and be free of debris and cobbles over 3 inches in maximum dimension.
c. Any imported soil to be used as engineered fill shall meet the following requirements:
(i) free of organics, debris and other deleterious materials (ii) be granular (sandy) in nature and have sufficient fines to allow for excavation of the foundation trenches.
(iii) free of rock and cobbles in excess of 3 inches
(iv) have an expansion potential not greater than low (EI<20) (v) have a soluble sulfate content less than 150 ppm
d. Imported fill material should be approved by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to importing. The Geotechnical Consultant should be notified not less than 5 working days in advance of placing any fill or base course material proposed for import. Each proposed source of import material should be sampled, tested and approved by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to delivery of any soils imported for use on the site.
5.2.5 Fill Placement and Compaction
a. Any fill or backfill required should be placed in accordance with the recommendations presented below.
b. Material to be compacted or reworked should be moisture conditioned or dried to achieve near-optimum conditions, and compacted to achieve the following minimum relative compaction:
(a) All fill and compacted building subgrade: 90%
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
(b)
(c)
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
Upper 6 inches of sub grade in pavement/drive areas: 95% Baserock and subbase: 95%.
c. The placement moisture content of imported material should be evaluated prior to grading.
d. The relative compaction and required moisture content shall be based on the maximum d1y density and optimum moisture content obtained in accordance with ASTM Dl557.
e. The in-place dry density and moisture content of the compacted fill shall be tested in accordance with ASTM D8167 /D8167M-18 or ASTM D6938.
f. The number and frequency of field tests required will be based on applicable county standards and at the discretion of the Geo technical Consultant. As a minimum standard every 1 vertical foot of engineered fill placed within a building pad area, and every 2 vertical feet in all other areas shall be tested, unless specified otherwise by a Rock Solid Engineering, Inc. representative.
g. Fill should be compacted by mechanical means in uniform horizontal loose lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness.
h. All fill should be placed and all grading performed in accordance with applicable codes and the requirements of the regulating agency.
5.2.6 Preparation of On-Site Soils
a. Laboratory consolidation test results indicate that the native, near surface soils are moderately compressible under the anticipated loads and moderately collapsible upon wetting. Site preparation, consisting of over excavation and recompaction of the native sub grade will be required prior to placement of shallow foundations, slabs-on-grade, and pavements.
b. The native subgrade beneath shallow foundations should be reworked to a depth sufficient to provide a zone of compacted fill extending at least 3 feet below the bottom of all footings. c. The native subgrade beneath slabs-on-grade floors should be reworked to a depth sufficient to provide a zone of compacted fill extending at least 12 inches below the bottom of the capillary break. d. The native subgrade beneath pavements should be reworked to a depth sufficient to provide a zone of compacted fill extending at least 12 inches below the bottom of aggregate base coarse.
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
e. The zone of compacted fill must extend a minimum of 3 feet laterally beyond all shallow foundations and 2 feet beyond pavements. f. A representative of our firm shall observe the bottom of the excavation once the required depth of overexcavation has been achieved to verify suitability. Prior to replacing the excavated soil, the exposed surface should be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted.
g. The depths of reworking required are subject to review by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading when subsurface conditions become exposed.
5.2.7 Groundwater Table
Groundwater was not encountered during the course of our investigation, and is not expected to interfere with the proposed construction.
5.2.8 Expansive Soils
Our laboratory testing shows that the expansion index of the near surface soils are equal to 43, this indicates that the expansion potential of the near surface soils should be considered low.
The California Building Code (Section 1803.5.3) defines soils with an Expansion Index greater than 20 to be expansive. The foundation and grading recommendations presented herein are intended to be in accordance with CBC Section 1808.6.
5.2.9 Sulfate Content
The results of our laboratory testing indicate that the soluble sulfate content of the on-site soils likely to come into contact with concrete is below the 150 ppm generally considered to constitute an adverse sulfate condition. Type II cement is therefore considered adequate for use in concrete in contact with the on-site soils.
5.2.10 Surface Drainage
a. Pad drainage should be designed to collect and direct surface water away from structures to approved drainage facilities. Where soil is adjacent to foundations, a minimum gradient of 5 percent for a distance of no less than 10 feet measured perpendicularly from the wall face, should be maintained and drainage should be directed toward approved swales or drainage facilities. If 10 horizontal feet can not be satisfied due to lot lines or physical constraints, the drainage shall be designed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1804.4 of the 2019 California Building Code.
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
b. Swales and impervious surfaces shall be sloped a minimum of 2 percent towards an approved drainage inlet or discharge point or as specified by the Project Civil Engineer.
c. All roof eaves should be guttered with downspouts provided. The downspouts shall discharge to either splash blocks or solid pipe to carry the storm water away from the stmcture to reduce the possibility of soil saturation and erosion. It may be necessary to use swales or pipes to direct the mnoff to an appropriate drainage system or discharge location.
d. We recommend that infiltration facilities be located at least 10 feet from stmctures.
e. Drainage patterns approved at the time of constmction should be maintained throughout the life of the stmctures. The building and surface drainage facilities must not be altered nor any grading, filling, or excavation conducted in the area without prior review by the Geotechnical Consultant.
f. Irrigation activities at the site should be controlled and reasonable.
Planter areas should not be sited adjacent to walls without implementing approved measures to contain irrigation water and prevent it from seeping into walls and under foundations and slabs on-grade. Large trees should be planted a minimum distance of ½ their mature height away from the foundation.
5.2.11 Utility Trenches
a. Bedding material may consist of sand with SE not less than 20 which may then be jetted, unless local jurisdictional requirements govern. b. Existing on-site soils may be utilized for trench backfill, provided they are free of organic material and rocks over 6 inches in diameter. c. If sand is used, a 3 foot concrete plug should be placed in each trench where it passes under the exterior footings.
d. Backfill of all exterior and interior trenches should be placed in thin lifts and mechanically compacted to achieve a relative compaction of not less than 95% in paved areas and 90% in other areas per ASTM D-1557. Care should be taken not to damage utility lines. e. Utility trenches that are parallel to the sides of a building should be placed so that they do not extend below a line sloping down and away at an inclination of 2: 1 (H:V) from the bottom outside edge of all footings.
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
f. Trenches should be capped with 1.5± feet of impermeable material.
Import material must be approved by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to its use.
g. Trenches must be shored as required by the local regulatory agency, the State Of California Division of Industrial Safety Construction Safety Orders, and Federal OSHA requirements.
5.3 Foundations
5.3.1 General
a. It is our opinion that the subject site will be suitable for the support of the proposed structure on a foundation system composed of conventional, shallow, continuous and pad footings.
b. At the time we prepared this report, grading and foundation plans had not been finalized. We request an opportunity to review these plans during the design stages to determine if supplemental
recommendations will be necessary.
5.3.2 Conventional Shallow Foundations
a. Footing widths should be based on the allowable bearing values but not less than 12 inches for 1 story, 15 inches for 2 story, 18 inches for 3 story structures.
b. The minimum recommended depth of embedment is 24 inches for all footings. Should local building codes require deeper embedment of the footings or wider footings the codes must apply. c. Footing excavations must be checked by the Geotechnical Consultant before steel is placed and concrete is poured to insure bedding into proper material. Excavations should be thoroughly wetted down just prior to pouring concrete.
d. The allowable bearing capacity shall not exceed 2,000 psf. e. The allowable bearing capacity values above may be increased by one-third in the case of short duration loads, such as those induced by wind or seismic forces.
f. In the event that footings are founded in structural fill consisting of imported soil, the recommended allowable bearing capacity may need to be re-evaluated.
Geotechnical Investigation Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
5 .4 Settlements
Total and differential settlements beneath foundation elements are expected to be within tolerable limits. Vertical movements are not expected to exceed 1 inch.
Differential movements are expected to be within the normal range(½ inch) for the anticipated loads and spacings. These preliminary estimates should be reviewed by the Geotechnical Consultant when foundation plans for the proposed structures become available.
5.5 Retaining Structures
5.5.1 General
Retaining walls may be founded on conventional shallow footings.
Recommendations for this foundation system are provided in Section 5.3, Foundations.
5.5.2 Lateral Earth Pressures
a.
I
b.
C.
The lateral earth pressures presented in Table 2 are recommended for the design of retaining structures with a gravel backdrain and backfill soils of expansivity not higher than medium. Should the slope behind the retaining walls be other than level or 3: 1 (H: V), supplemental design criteria will be provided for the active earth or at-rest pressures for the particular slope angle.
Table 2: Lateral Earth Pressures I
Soil Pressure (psf/ft)
Type Soil
Profile Unrestrained Rigidly
Wall Supported Wall
Active Pressure Level 35 -
3:1 55 -
At-Rest Pressure Level -76
3:1 -106
Passive Pressure* Level 390 195
*Neglect upper 1' 3:1 270 135
The friction factor between rough concrete and the native, near surface sandy clay is 0.35.
Where both friction and the passive resistance are utilized for sliding resistance, either of the values indicated should be reduced by one third.
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
d. When required by the code, lateral load due to earthquakes may be calculated as 17xH2 acting at 0.6H above the base of the wall. e. These are ultimate values, no factor of safety has been applied. f. Although not anticipated, pressure due to any surcharge loads from adjacent footings, traffic, etc., should be analyzed separately.
Pressures due to these loading configurations can be supplied upon receipt of the appropriate plans and loads.
5.5.3 Backfill
a. Backfill should be placed under engineering control. b. It is recommended that granular, or relatively low expans1v1ty, backfill be utilized, for a width equal to approximately 1/3 x wall height, and not less than 2 feet, subject to review during construction. c. The granular backfill should be capped with at least 12 inches of relatively impe1meable material.
d. Backfill should be compacted to achieve a minimum 90 percent relative compaction, the compaction standard being obtained in accordance with ASTM D-1557.
e. Precautions should be taken to ensure that heavy compaction equipment is not used immediately adjacent to walls, so as to prevent undue pressures against, and movement of, the walls.
f. The use of water-stops/impermeable barriers and appropriate waterproofing should be considered for any basement construction, and for building walls which retain earth.
5.5.4 Backfill Drainage
a. Backdrains should consist of a minimum 4-inch diameter, perforated, SDR 35 pipe or equivalent, embedded in permeable material meeting the State of California Standard Specification Section 68-2.02F(3), Class 2, or equivalent. A layer of Mirafi 140N Filter Fabric, or equivalent, shall be placed over the permeable material and the remaining 12 inches shall be capped with compacted native soil. The pipe should be approximately 4 inches above the trench bottom with a gradient of at least 1 % being provided to the pipe and trench bottom, discharging to an approved location. See Figure 2 for Retaining Wall Backdrain Configuration.
. .
.. ' ...
1-----i -.
12 INCHES CAP OF
COMPACTED SOIL INISHED GRADE
. < : · LASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL
1-----1 _. : ~~ · ... '· ·.. 1TH SPECIFIED FILTER FABRIC COVERING · .:_ ...... ·· i. :. TOP OF PERMEABLE MATERIAL.
1-----1: ·. ~~ ~. -~ ... £ ••
. · . . .. . . . . .
··: ,l,. ~· . £ • ~ 1'.:
1-----1, . ·L. ,,,,
. · ... > .· R WALLS ENCLOSING INTERIOR SPACES, THE
1-------f
~--~----<
••
4 .• : , '. •• • ALL SHALL BE DAMPPROOFED OR WATERPROOFED , .z.. · , . : ··. N ACCORDANCE WITH THE CBC. WATERPROOFING IS • ••• 4.". ·: =-~-' :.: BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS REPORT. ... . .
... :~ .·· , -: . INCH RIGID PERFORATED SOR 35 PIPE
.,·. R APPROVED EQUIVALENT
. PERFORATIONS DOWN
12 INCHES
SLOPE PIPE MIN 1 % TO OUTLET
INCHES
BOTTOM OF PIPE TO BE LOCATED
BELOW FINISHED SLAB ELEVATION.
~CK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
RETAINING WALL
BACKDRAIN CONFIGURATION
FIGURE
2 Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
b. Should the proposed wall construction consist of steel I-beams with wood or concrete lagging and spacers are utilized between lagging courses, the filter fabric shall also be placed between the wall and permeable material.
c. Perforations in backdrains are recommended as follows: 3/8-inch diameter, in 2 rows at the ends of a 120 degree arc, at 3-inch centers in each row, staggered between rows, placed downward.
d. Backdrains placed behind retaining walls should be approved by the Geo technical Consultant prior to the placement of backfill. e. An unobstructed outlet should be provided at the lower end of each segment of backdrain. The outlet should consist of an unperforated pipe of the same diameter, connected to the perforated pipe and extended to a protected outlet at a lower elevation on a continuous gradient of at least 1 %.
f. When terrace retaining walls are proposed, the upper retaining wall should have a backdrain which extends below the elevation of the top of the lower retaining wall backdrain. This will prevent spring effects and seepage between the terraced walls.
g. We recommend vertical cleanouts be provided for the backdrain.
Cleanout locations should be shown on the drainage plan.
5.6 Slabs-on-Grade
a. Concrete floor slabs may be founded on compacted engineered fill per the recommendations in Section 5.2.6. The subgrade should be proof-rolled just prior to construction to provide a firm, relatively unyielding surface, especially if the surface has been loosened by the passage of construction traffic.
b. It is important that the subgrade soils be thoroughly saturated for 24 to 48 hours prior to the time the concrete is poured. For compacted engineered fill with a low expansion potential, the subgrade should be presoaked 4 percentage points above optimum to a depth of 1.0 feet. c. The slab-on-grade section should incorporate a minimum 4 inch capillary break consisting of 3/4 inch, clean, crushed rock, or approved equivalent.
Class II baserock is not recommended. Structural considerations may govern the thickness of the capillary break.
Geotechnical Investigation Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
5.7 d. Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are anticipated or vapor transmission may be a problem, a 15 mil waterproof membrane should be placed between the floor slab and the capillary break in order to reduce moisture condensation under the flam-coverings. Refer to ACI 302.2R-06 for additional criteria.
e. We have provided generalized recommendations associated with standard construction practices for the reduction of moisture transmission through concrete slab-on-grade floors. We are not moisture-proofing specialists. A waterproofing or moisture proofing expert should be consulted for project specific moisture protection recommendations.
f. Slab thiclmess, reinforcement, and doweling should be determined by the Project Structural Engineer, based on the design live and dead loads, including vehicles.
Preliminary Pavement Design
a. For the pavement design and planning, an R-value test was completed for a sample of the near surface soils. The results of the R-value tests at equilibrium is 15.
b. The subgrade material beneath pavements may differ from that sampled during our investigation. Therefore, these preliminary pavement sections are subject to verification after rough grading and revision if necessary based on additional R-value tests and revised traffic indices.
c. We have calculated several pavement sections options based on the tested R values and Traffic Indices ranging from 5 to 7. We have also provided the baserock thiclmess without geofabric reinforcement and with Mirafi RS3 80i geofabric.
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
I
PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT SECTIONS
I
Class II Baserock (inches)
Traffic A/C without with Mirafi
R-Value Index (inches) reinforcement RS380i
5 3 8 6
15 6 3.5 10.5 6.5
7 4 13 8
d. Use only quality materials of the type and minimum thickness specified. All baserock must meet Caltrans Standard Specification 26-1.02B for Class II Aggregate Base.
e. Compact the base and subgrade uniformly to a minimum relative dry density of95%.
g. Asphalt concrete should be placed only during periods of fair weather when the ambient air temperature is within prescribed limits. h. Provide sufficient gradient to prevent ponding of water.
1. Maintenance should be undertaken on a routine basis.
Geotechni cal lnvestigati on
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
6. LIMITATIONS
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
a. Our investigation was performed in accordance with the usual and current standards of the profession, as they relate to this and similar localities. No other wan-anty, expressed or implied, is provided as to the conclusions and professional advice presented in this report.
b. The samples taken and tested, and the observations made, are considered to be representative of the site; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between sample locations.
c. As in most projects, conditions revealed during construction excavation may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the Project Geotechnical Consultant, and revised recommendations be provided as required.
d. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the Owner, or of his Representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the Architect and Engineer for the project and incorporated into the plans, and that it is ensured that the Contractor and Subcontractors implement such recommendations in the field. e. This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety engineering. We do not direct the Contractor's operations, and we are not responsible for other than our own personnel on the site; therefore, the safety of others is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Contractor should notify the Owner if he considers any of the recommended actions presented herein to be unsafe.
f. The findings of this report are considered valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a site can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural events or to human activities on this or adjacent sites. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate codes and standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. g. Accordingly, this report may become invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and revision as changed conditions are identified.
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
REFERENCES
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
1. American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE 7 Hazards Report, Site Utilized July 12, 2022. https :/ /www .asce7hazardtoo 1. on line/
2. California Building Standards Commission, July 2019, 2019 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Effective January 1, 2020.
3. County of Monterey, Geologic Hazards Map, Site Utilized August 8, 2022. https://montereyco.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer
4. County of Monterey, Parcel Repo1t Web App, Site Utilized July 12, 2022. https ://maps. co. monterey. ca. us/wab/parcelreportwebapp/.
5. Dibblee, T.W. and Minch, J.A., 2007, Geologic Map of the Natividad Quadrangle, Monterey County, California, Dibblee Geological Foundation, Dibblee Foundation Map DF-354, Scale:
1:24,000.
6. The Paul Davis Partnership, Architects and Plam1ers, CRISP A Senior Housing Apartments, E. Alvin Drive, Salinas, CA, APN: 261-661-011, Project Number: 2211, Sheets Al .1 and A2. l, Dated 07/22/2022.
APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
• Field Exploration Procedures Page A-1
. Laboratory Testing Procedures Page A-2
. Boring Location Plan Figure A-1
. Key to Logs Figure A-2
• Logs of Exploratory Borings Figures A-3 thru A-9
• Summary of Laboratory Test Results Figures A-10.1 & A-10.2 • Direct Shear Test Results Figure A-11
. Consolidation Test Results Figure A-12 & A-13
. R-Value Test Results Figure A-14
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
Page A-1
A-1. Subsurface conditions were explored by drilling 7 borings to depths between 6.5 and 21.5 feet below existing grade. The borings were advanced with a truck mounted drill rig equipped with 6 inch solid stem augers. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Boring Location Plan, Figure A-1. The Key to Logs, Figure A-2, gives definitions of the terms used in the Logs of Exploratory Borings. The Logs of Exploratory Borings are presented in Figures A-3 through A-9.
A-2. Drilling of the borings was observed by our Field Engineer who logged the soils and obtained bulk and relatively undisturbed samples for classification and laboratory testing. The soils were classified, based on field observations and laboratory testing, in accordance with Unified Soil Classification System.
A-3. Relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained by means of a drive sampler. The hammer weight and drop being 140 pounds and 30 inches, respectively. The number of"Blows/Foot" required to drive samplers are indicated on the logs.
A-4. Exploratory borings were located in the field by measuring from known landmarks. The locations, as shown, are therefore within the accuracy of such a measurement.
A-5. Groundwater was not encountered during the course of our field exploration.
Geotechni cal Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
LABO RA TORY TESTING PROCEDURES
A-6. Classification
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
Page A-2
Soils were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Moisture content and in-situ density determinations were made from relatively undisturbed soil samples. The results are presented in the Logs of Exploratory Borings and in the Summary of Laboratory Test Results, Figures A-10.1 and A-10.2.
A-7. Direct Shear
Direct shear strength tests were performed on representative samples of the on-site soils in accordance with laboratory test standard ASTM D 3080-98. Samples were relatively undisturbed, or remolded as specified. To simulate possible adverse field conditions, the samples were saturated prior to testing unless otherwise noted. A saturating device was used which permitted the samples to absorb moisture while preventing volume change. The direct shear test results are presented in Figure A-11.
A-8. Consolidation
Consolidation tests were performed on representative, relatively undisturbed samples of the underlying soils to determine compressibility characteristics. The samples were saturated during the tests to simulate possible adverse field conditions. The test results are presented in Figures A-12 and A-13.
A-9. Expansion Index
Expansion tests were performed on representative, remolded samples of the on-site soils in accordance with laboratory test standard ASTM D 4829-11. The test results are presented in Figure A-10.1.
A-10. Amount of Materials in Soil Finer than the No. 200 Sieve Determination of the amount of materials in the soil finer than the No. 200 sieve analyses were performed on samples considered representative of the on-site soils. The laboratory test was performed in accordance with ASTM: D 1140. The test results are presented in Figure A-10.1.
A-11. Soluble Sulfates
The soluble sulfate content was determined for samples considered representative of the on site soils likely to come in contact with concrete in accordance with test method California 417. The test results are presented in Figure A-10.1.
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Senior Housing Apartments
98 Kip Drive, Salinas, California
A-12. R-Value
Project No. 22030
August 29, 2022
Page A-3
The resistance (R) value was determined for a sample considered representative of the native soils anticipated to be used as pavement subgrade in accordance with ASTM D-2844. The test result is presented in Figure A-14.
0 r ALVIN DRIVr
f00fP
0P05f 17 5f NI0
H0U51Na PR0JfCr
I ,
I • . ,
' I •
®B-1
I'\\ \ ~-----itr;:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;-::;;;-;;;-;;;;;;;;:~~;;;;;-;--;;:---~-~ l?A5f MPP fR0M PR0P05fl7 51-it P~Ml, PRf PARfl7 l?Y
1rlf PAlt 17AVl5 PARfNfR5HIP, 17A1tl7 05{ 14{ 2_022,
(
ft?gcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
BORING LOCATION PLAN FIGURE
11--------------------l
98 Kip Drive, Salinas A-I
KEY TO LOGS
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
GROUP
PRIMARY DIVISIONS SYMBOL SECONDARY DIVISIONS
CLEAN GRAVELS GW Well graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines
GRAVELS
More than half of (Less than 5% fines) GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines the coarse fraction
COARSE is larger than the GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines GRAVEL GRAINED No. 4 sieve SOILS
WITH FINES
GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines More than half of
the material is CLEAN SANDS SW Well graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines larger than the SANDS (Less than 5% fines)
No. 200 sieve More than half of SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines the coarse fraction
is smaller than the SAND SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines No. 4 sieve WITH FINES SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines ML Inorganic silts and very fine sands, silty or clayey fine sands or clayey silts with slight plasticity
FINE SIL TS AND CLAYS CL Inorganic clays oflow to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, GRAINED Liquid limit less than 50 sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays SOILS OL Organic silts and organic silty clays oflow plasticity More than half of Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomacaceous fine sandy or the material is MH silty soils, elastic silts
smaller than the SIL TS AND CLAYS
No. 200 sieve Liquid limit greater than 50 CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silts HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt Peat and other highly organic soils
GRAIN SIZE LIMITS
SAND GRAVEL
SILT AND CLAY
MEDIUM I I
COBBLES BOULDERS
FINE COARSE FINE COARSE
No. 200 No. 40 No. 10 No. 4 3/4 in. 3 in. 12 in.
us STANDARD SIEVE SIZE
RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY MOISTURE CONDITION
SAND AND GRAVEL BLOWS/FT* SILT AND CLAY BLOWS/FT* DRY
VERY LOOSE 0-4 VERY SOFT 0-2 DAMP
LOOSE 4-10 SOFT 2-4 MOIST
MEDIUM DENSE 10-30 FIRM 4-8 WET
DENSE 30-50 STIFF 8 -16
VERY DENSE OVER50 VERY STIFF 16 -32
HARD OVER32
• Number of blows of 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches to drive a 2 inch O.D. (I 3/8 inch I.D.) split spoon (ASTM D-1586).
I
lff?EcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC. II Fl~~E I
Project No.: 22030
Project: 98 Kip Drive
Salinas, California
Date:
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Boring: Bl
Location: Southwest Corner of Site
Elevation:
Method of Drilling: Truck Mounted Drill Rig
Logged By:
June 17, 2022
JDB 6 in. Solid Stem Auger, 140 lb. Hammer
~
$
-B 0,
<U
Ci
5 10
15 20
-
25 "Cl
<U <U
0,
--e ;;,-.,
""' f-< .E "3 "' ·s ~ P'.l
f/l i::
:::i
i/12" DIA
lLJ Sample ~
2.5" DIA
Sample
DJ
Terzaghi Split ~
Spoon Sample
Description
Static Water
Table
Bulk
Sample
CL \X Dark Grayish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Very Stiff, Slightly 30 1-r--oc--..Plastic. Fine Grained Sand.
l ~ Material Consistent. Fine to Coarse Grained Sand. 22
6.4 -
\Z Material Consistent. Hard. Lighter Brown. Clay Content _ Increases.
TV Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Very Stiff, Medium 1--'-+A--"Plastic to Plastic. Fine Grained Sand. Black Lenses. -
\ Z Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Very Stiff, Plastic. _ Fine Grained Sand.
V Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Stiff, Plastic. Fine /\ Grained Sand.
Boring Terminated @ 21.5 Feet
Groundwater Not Encountered
Boring Backfilled With Cuttings
9.6 39 123.6 11.8 138.2
22 18.5
22 101.9 23.7 126.1
15 32.5
l.f!EcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
Direct
Shear
Q
"' 8
Ll
0 -e-
Sulfate
55% Fines
II FI~~E I
Project No.: 22030
Project: 98 Kip Drive
Salinas, California
Date: June 17, 2022
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Boring: B2
Location: Northwest Corner of Site
Elevation:
Method of Drilling: Truck Mounted Drill Rig
Logged By: JOB 6 in. Solid Stem Auger, 140 lb. Hammer
,-_
~
"%
<lJ
Q
5 15
20 -
-
25 •
'Cl
<lJ <lJ
0. ..D
>-. ...
E-B
(/}
·o :.a
Cl) ,::
;:::i
~
~
3 O'.l
l7i 2"DIA
liJ Sample
2.5" DIA
Sample
[D
Terzaghi Split ~
Spoon Sample
Descriotion
Static Water
Table
Bulk
Sample
CL \ 8 Dark Grayish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard, Medium Plastic. Fine Grained Sand.
rr V Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard, Medium
..... 11.._../\__,,Plastic. Fine to Coarse Grained Sand. ~
0 iii
-<lJ
~
86 115.8 5.4 122.0
71 6.4
CL T x Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard, Slighly Plastic. 64 17.1 \
~ Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard, Plastic. Fine ~ to Medium Grained Sand.
rrx..-Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard, Plastic.
I--'--" I_ Fine Grained Sand.
x Material Consistent. Very Stiff.
Boring Terminated @ 21.5 Feet
Groundwater Not Encountered
Boring Backfilled With Cuttings
55 116.5 16.6 135.9
33 19.7
17 28.7
J!!EcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
Direct
Shear
C
(/}
-8
u
0 -e-
Consolidation
Sulfate
66% Fines
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Project No.: 22030 Boring:
Project: 98 Kip Drive
Salinas, California
Location:
Elevation:
Date: Method of Drilling:
Logged By:
June 17, 2022
JDB
g
<1.)
0. ?' ,5
0. ·o <1.)
Q (/]
CL
5 -
-
-
-
-
-
[Z] 2" DIA
[SJ
2.5" DIA
0 Bulk
"Cl Sample Sample Sample <1.)
..0 .... .-"<
E ::l Cl)
P'.1 [D Terzaghi Split ~ Static Water :a
<:1 Spoon Sample Table :=i
Description
\ ½ Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard, Plastic.
1-r-lc---,1Fine to Coarse Grained Sand. Holes, Roots.
X Material Consistent. __._ _ _,,
\ -6 Material Consistent. Micaceous.
.----'
18 Olive Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Very Stiff, Plastic.
Fine to Coarse Grained Sand. Blocky.
58 15
505"
13 506"
27 X
Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Firm, Medium Plastic 7 Fine Grained Sand.
Boring Terminated@ 16.5 Feet
Groundwater Not Encountered
Boring Backfilled With Cuttings
Jl!EcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
B3
North of Proposed Courtyard
Truck Mounted Drill Rig
6 in. Solid Stem Auger, 140 lb. Hammer
117.3 6.4
7.5 120.8 11.8
17.2 22.8
124.8
135.1
Direct
Shear
0 -e-
51 % Fines
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Project No.: 22030 Boring:
Project: 98 Kip Drive
Salinas, California
Location:
Elevation:
Date: Method of Drilling:
Logged By:
June 17, 2022
JDB
~ <l)
:S 0. >,
t
f-<
·o <l)
Q Ul
CL
5 10
-
15 ·
-
-
-
-
-
25 •
"O
<l)
-e .-'<
B :3 Cf)
:; 0'.1
i::
;:::i
-
f712" DIA
liJ Sample [SJ
2.5" DIA
Sample
DJ
Terzaghi Split ~
Spoon Sample
Descriotion
Static Water
Table
Bulk
Sample
\
~ Dark Grayish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard, Medium 48 [X Plastic. Fine to Coarse Grained Sand.
llxf--Olive Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Very Stiff, Medium Plastic 29 I-'--+ !__,,Fine to Coarse Grained Sand. Arkosic.
.....___ X Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard, Slightly Plastic. 506" Fine to Coarse Grained Sand.
T
V Yellowish Brown and White Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard,
.,_._..,./\_Plastic. Fine to Medium Grained Sand. White Lenses. i\/ Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Stiff, Medium
1/\ Plastic. Fine Grained Sand.
Boring Terminated@ 16.5 Feet
Groundwater Not Encountered
Boring Backfilled With Cuttings
36 11
Jl!EcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
B4
South of Proposed Courtyard
Truck Mounted Drill Rig
6 in. Solid Stem Auger, 140 lb. Hammer
105.1
108.3
6.2 22.6
9.6 8.0
17.4 21.8
C
(.)
8 .€
Cf)
f
Q .....
<l)
~
111.6
117.0
Direct
Shear
C
Cf)
8 (.)
0 -e-
58% Fines
E.I.=43
Sulfate
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Project No.: 22030 Boring:
Project: 98 Kip Drive
Salinas, California
Location:
Elevation:
Date: Method of Drilling:
Logged By:
June 17, 2022
JDB
~ <l)
:S 0.
?' ~ ·a <l)
Q (/)
-
CL -
-
-
"Cl
<l)
.n ,...
~ B
ti) ;:l
:.s i:o
Cl
:::i
f712" DIA
lLJ Sample [SJ
2.5" DIA
Sample
DJ
Terzaghi Split ~
Spoon Sample
Description
I Abandoned Pipe at Surface.
Static Water
Table
Bulk
Sample
\8 Dark Grayish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Very Stiff,
Slightly Plastic. Fine to Medium Grained Sand. Mottled. rr X Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Very Stiff, Medium 1-l-'-f-I___,, Plastic. Fine Grained Sand.
B5
Southeast Corner of Site
Truck Mounted Drill Rig
6 in. Solid Stem Auger, 140 lb. Hammer
Direct
Shear
Q
ti)
8 (.)
0 -e-
27 107.8 8.4 116.9 530 21 Consolidation
17 11.9
5 -
-T )< Material Consistent. Very Stiff. Fine to Coarse Grained Sand. 32 15.3 -
-
-
10-
-
-
-
15 -
_ MH
-
-
20 -
-
.
25 -
\8 Olive Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard, Plastic. Fine
~ Grained Sand. Black Blocky.
KJ Olive Brown Sandy SILT. Moist, Stiff, Medium
1/\ Plastic. Fine Grained Sand.
Boring Terminated@ 16.5 Feet
Groundwater Not Encountered
Boring Backfilled With Cuttings
47 104.6 22.6 128.3
13 21.8
}l!gcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Project No.: 22030
Project: 98 Kip Drive
Salinas, California
Boring:
Location:
Elevation:
Date: June 17, 2022
JDB
Method of Drilling:
Logged By:
~ <l.)
$ 0. ;,..
t
f-
·o <l.)
Q [/]
-CL
-
-
5 -
-
-
IO -
-
-
-
15 -
-
-
-
-
20 -
-
-
-
-
25 •
I
"O
<l.)
..0 ,_..
~ B
U) ::>
~ i::o
~
::J
~
~
X
T X
i712" DIA
liJ Sample [SJ
DJ
Terzaghi Split
Spoon Sample
2.5" DIA
Sample
~
Description
Static Water
Table
Bulk
Sample
Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Hard, Slightly Plastic. Fine
to Coarse Grained Sand.
Material Consistent. Yellowish Brown.
Material Consisten. Very Stiff.
T
V Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Very Stiff, Plastic. 1-L---+J\--'IFine Grained Sand.
~ Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Very Stiff,
1/\ Plastic. Fine Grained Sand.
Boring Terminated@ 16.5 Feet
Groundwater Not Encountered
Boring Backfilled With Cuttings
U)
;S
0 2i5
20 506"
57 22
20 27
JllEcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
B6
Northeast Corner of Site
Truck Mounted Drill Rig
6 in. Solid Stem Auger, 140 lb. Hammer
~
Q ~ Q Direct
0 E
0 Shear
U)
8 8 ::>
~ blJ ~
0 _q c
<l.)
U) 0 ·;;; § ~ ._§
~ u ~ ~ 8 ~ <l.)
2:
<l.) Q ~ {l f- Q Q U) 0
r:, £1 0) 8 -0-i ...:i
Q ·c3 :3: 0
~
113 .1 5.2 119.0 R-Value=l5
6.9 7.7
20.1 20.6
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Project No.: 22030 Boring:
Project: 98 Kip Drive
Salinas, California
Location:
Elevation:
Date: Method of Drilling:
Logged By:
June 17, 2022
JDB
~ <l)
$ 0.
~
t ·s <l)
Q VJ
-
_ CL
-
5 -
-
-
-
10 -
-
.
15 ·
.
.
20 •
25 "O
<l)
{2 ."<
.a "5
:a a'.l
i::
::-i
~
[Z]
2" DIA
Sample [SJ
2.5" DIA
Sample
[D
Terzaghi Split ¥'.
Spoon Sample
Descriotion
Static Water
Table
\8 Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY. Moist, Very Stiff,
Slightly Plastic. Fine to Coarse Grained Sand.
~ )< Material Consistent. Hard. Clay Content Increases. )< Material Consistent.
Boring Terminated@ 6.5 Feet
Groundwater Not Encountered
Boring Backfilled With Cuttings
Bulk
Sample
30 36
37 Jl!EcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
B7
Middle of East Side of Site
Truck Mounted Drill Rig
6 in. Solid Stem Auger, 140 lb. Hammer
99.9 6.9 106.8
11.2 12.1
Direct
Shear
Q
"' 8
0 0
-e-
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
,-_
E
0. ~ 0.
~
GRAIN SIZE (%)
µ.l C/J
IN-SITU DIRECT SHEAR
~ ~ CJ
µ.l
::r::
~
Q Q µ.i <(
~
0 0
z f-, 8
~
8 Q ..-1 µ.,
~
~ ~ "' 0 0 s µ.l ,-l :>, :>, 8
~Q
..-1 ....,
0 0 ...., f--, ~ f--, f--, z~ µ.i Q :>, C/J C/J
O'.l 0 vi vi 0 ~ >
f--, z
C/J f--, z -<( :Z<(
~
..-1 <( <( µ.l
iii
[fl µ.i
iii
[fl µ.i 0 µ.i j vi ..-1 ,-l
-f--, ~
Oz b:J c -P... [fl u ~ ~ Q Q f--, ~ 0
~
:s 0 f--, 0 u µ.l ,-l u µ.i u ;:2 0 Q :3: µ, C/J
Bl 1.0 CL 6.4 7
Bl 2.5 CL 9.6 55
Bl 5.0 CL 123.6 11.8 138.2
Bl 10.0 CL 18.5
Bl 15.0 CL I 01.9 23.7 126.1
Bl 20.0 CL 32.5
B2 1.0 CL 115.8 5.4 122.0 5
B2 2.5 CL 6.4
B2 5.0 CL 17.1 66
B2 10.0 CL 116.5 16.6 135.9
B2 15.0 CL 19.7
B2 20.0 CL 28.7
B3 1.0 CL 117.3 6.4 124.8 51
B3 2.5 CL 7.5
B3 5.0 CL 120.8 11.8 135.1
B3 10.0 CL 17.2
B3 15.0 CL 22.8
B4 1.0 CL 105.1 6.2 111.6
B4 1-3 CL 22.6 58 43
B4 2.5 CL 9.6
B4 5.0 CL 108.3 8.0 117.0 20
I
Jl?EcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
I
FIGURE
A-IO.I
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
,....._
s
0..
X 8
µ.) r/l
IN-SITU DIRECT SHEAR GRAIN SIZE(%)
~
µ.)
µ.) f-< (.'.J ::r: ~
Q Q µ.i <t:'.
~
0 0
z f-< 8
~
8 Q ,-1 µ.,
P-, f-<
~ e,
Vl
0 0 ;3 µ.) .-:l ;:,-, >--8
~Q
,-1 - 0 Q -f-;:i f-f-z~ µ.i Q >--
r/l r/l i'.Q 0 u5 f-z u5 0 ~ Z<!'. > ~
f-<!'. z µ.) r/l
~
f/l µ.i
~
...., <!'.
~
,-l ,-1 <t:'. .-:l ...., f-f/l µ.i 0 µ.i u5 P-,
Oz ~c
>-< p., f/l u X § Q Q f-~ 0 :;;;o u µ.) ;:,-, u f-0 ;;:: .-:l ~ µ.i u 0 Q ~
(.I., r/l
B4 10.0 CL 17.4
B4 15.0 CL 21.8
B5 1.0 CL 107.8 8.4 116.9 530 21
B5 2.5 CL 11.9
B5 5.0 CL 15.3
B5 10.0 CL 104.6 22.6 128.3
B5 15.0 MH 21.8
B6 1.0 CL 113.1 5.2 119.0
B6 2.0 CL 6.9
B6 5.0 CL 7.7
B6 10.0 CL 20.l
B6 15.0 CL 20.6
B7 1.0 CL 99.9 6.9 106.8
B7 2.5 CL 11.2
B7 5.0 CL 12.1
I
JllEcK SOLID ENGINEERINGJ INC.
I
FIGURE
A-10.2
BORING: B5 COHESION FRICTION
DEPTH (ft): 1.0 (psf) ANGLE
SOIL TYPE (USCS): CL PEAK 530 21
-------RESIDUAL 470 19
TEST SAMPLE TYPE: FIELD MOISTURE: 8.4%
IN-SITU (SATURATED) SATURATED MOIST: 17.8%
3500
3000
2500
' Q
(/}
Q.
2000 .__,
00 00
~
r-'
:~:
00 ~
< 1500 f.l .,.,,,,.. - :c i,..,-- 00
~
.,.,,,,..
I)..,,,-'.,.,,,,..
~ f>
1000 -
~
.....--.,.,,,,.. ,.,,.,..-
~
~
i..---.,.,,,,..
500 ....
0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
NORMAL LOAD (psf)
If?:gcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS FIGURE
98 Kip Drive, Salinas A-11
BORING: B2 FIELD MOISTURE
DEPTH (ft): 1.0 -------sATURATED
SOIL TYPE (USCS): CL ...................... REBOUND
SEATING WEIGHT: 250 psf FIELD MOISTURE: 5.4%
SATURATED MOIST: 15.2%
3%
2%
1%
0%
--- -1%
-2%
I'
-3% "'-----........ z -------'
0 ---------------· .... 1sa----·--,l. E-< -4% -< Q .... ..:l
0 -5%
rJJ
z 0 -6% u
-7%
-8%
-9%
-10%
-11%
-12%
100 1000 10000
NORMAL LOAD (psf)
Jf!gcK SOLID ENGINEER/NG, INC.
CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE
98 Kip Drive, Salinas A-12
BORING: BS FIELD MOISTURE
DEPTH (ft): 1.0 ------.. SATURATED
SOIL TYPE (USCS): CL ...................... REBOUND
SEA TING WEIGHT: 220 psf FIELD MOISTURE: 8.4%
SATURATED MOIST: 15.4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-----------
-1% ~
-...,
~ ...... ...... -2%
7~
-3% z
0 -f,-<
-4% -< A
' -..:l
0 -5%
'- ifJ
z ~--------~ 0 ' ----· --- -6% ----- u -------· ----"'--""ii, -7%
-8%
-9%
-10%
-11%
-12%
100 1000 10000
NORMAL LOAD (psf)
JllgcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE
98 Kip Drive, Salinas A-13
D
Earth S~stems
500 Park Center Drive, Unit 1 I Hollister, CA 95023 I 831.637.2133 I www.earthsystems.com Rock Solid Engineering OTF File No.: 301321-001
RSE Project 22033
RESISTANCE 'R' VALUE AND EXPANSION PRESSURE CTM 301
July 18, 2022
Boring 116 @ 1.0 -5.0' Dry Density @ 300 psi Exudation Pressure: 130.2-pcf Brown Clayey Sand (SC) %Moisture @ 300 psi Exudation Pressure: 11.9% Specified Traffic Index: 5.0 R-Value -Exudation Pressure: 15 R-Value -Expansion Pressure: 25
R-Value@ Equilibrium: 15
EXUDATION PRESSURE
CHART EXPANSION PRESSURE CHART
2.0 90 ~
I
--,
1.8 80 .:::
..r p: 1.6 ' -:::,
'I
"' 70
"'
~
.:.l
-~ IA /:l.,
---z --
60 0
;:
-I'. 1.2 ----Q ------- --~
-
.:.l 50
:::, -.:.l
' ..l ;;., 1.0 ' -I'. ~ I -
> -- - --"'
- -, -
0: 40 "' ----~ ------
--.:.l ~
~
0.8 -
S:! -- -~ 30 --- -;: 0.6
c:i:
~ --- - > ' 20 0 ' - --
u 0.4
-
--- - 10 0.2
--
I
0 0,0
800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0,0 0.2 0.4 0,6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.-1 1.6 1.8 2.0 EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE, ft Iff!gcK SOLID ENGINEERING, INC.
I
R-VALUE
II~ 98 Kip Drive, Salinas A-14
FACILITIES TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN
City of Salinas • Community Development Department • 65 West Alisa! Street • Salinas, CA 9390 I • (831) 758-7206 EXHIBIT 29
For Permit/Subdivision No. 98 Kip Drive -GPA 2023-001, RZ 2023-001, CUP 2022-059, RS 2022-006, and MM 2022-019
The follavving Residential Facilities Traffic Management Measures are included, and made a part hereof, in the above referenced permit/subdivision:
Included Vehicle Trip Residential Reduction
Check (v; Reduction Permit/Subdivision Conditions (%)
All boxes Measure
that aJJJJly
Provide ridesharing, public transportation and
nearby (within one mile) licensed child care
Public Information facilities information to tenants/buyers as a part of 1.0% move-in materials. An information packet must be
provided as part of the project's development
approval process.
Print transit schedule information on all
Printed transit promotional materials for the project. Printed .5% schedules transit schedules shall be provided as part of the project's development approval process.
Bike lanes must be provided adjacent to the project
~ Bicycle amenities and must tie into a City-wide system and provide 2.0% bicycle access to schools, employment centers and
shopping within two miles.
Facilities or measures which go beyond those listed 1.0% Other bicycle above and which facilitate increase non-vehicular amenities trips. Description attached.
Provide bus pull-outs, convenient pedestrian access 2.0% Bus pull-outs to bus stops and other related amenities to encourage transit use for those portions of the
development within one-quarter mile of a bus stop.
Provide locked and secured transpo1iation .5%
Transportation information centers or kiosks with bus schedules information centers and transit information as a part of the common area of the development if agreement is reached
with transit agencv for maintenance of information.
Total
(%)
2.0%
rm
Included Vehicle Trip Residential Reduction Total
Check (v) Reduction Permit/Subdivision Conditions (%) (%) All boxes Measure
that avvly
~
Provide pedestrian facilities linking transit stops
Pedestrian facilities top common areas. .5% .5%
Provide park-and-ride facilities if part of an on-site
Park-and-ride traffic management plan. 1.0%
Provide on-site child care facilities based on the
Child care facilities capacity of the center and marketing data on 1.0% expected use.
Provide facilities to encourage telecommuting such
Telecommuting as a telecommuting center. * 1.0%
Provide mixed uses that reduce the length and
Mixed uses number of vehicle trips. Project must consist of at 5.0% of least five acres of high-density housing within one-combined quarter mile of neighborhood commercial trips
development and have convenient pedestrian
access. (Note: Similar trip reduction measures
listed elsewhere cannot be counted toward the
required vehicle trio reduction).
Residential development with at least 35 percent of
~
Transit-oriented the project in high density housing and clustered 5.0% of 5.0% Design within one-quarter mile of bus stops on a major high density arterial with convenient pedestrian access to transit housing trips and neighborhood shopping.
Other measures supported by documented data of
Other trip reductions Varies
RESIDENTIAL TOT AL (Must total 7 percent or more) 7.5%
The following Commercial, Industrial a11d Tourist Orie11ted Vehicle Trip Reductio11 Measures are included, and made a part hereof, in the above referenced permit/subdivision:
Included Vehicle Trip Reduction Total
Check (v) Reduction Permit/Subdivision Conditions (%) (%) All boxes Measure
that apply
Provide on-site child care facilities for children of
Child care facilities customers. 1.0%
Provide on-site child care facilities for children of
Child care facilities employees. * 1.0%
Provide transit-scheduling information quarterly to
Transit scheduling employees. * 1.0%
information
* Optional traffic management measure (counts toward total if implemented).
Included Vehicle Trip Reduction Total
Check (v) Reduction Permit/Subdivision Conditions (%) (%) All boxes Measure
that aooly
Bicycle amenities I. Proposed development/use adjacent to bicycle I. 2.0% lanes. 2. Proposed development/use adjacent to
bicycle lanes, showers provided, and site is located
within 4 miles ofone-halfofthe City's residential 2. 4.0% areas.
Bus pull-outs Provide bus pull-outs, pedestrian access and transit 2.0% stops.
Provide transit subsidy program for employees that
Bus subsidy * reduces the cost of monthly bus pass by 50% from 4.0% standard group rate.
Provide locked and secures transportation
Transportation information centers or kiosks with bus schedules Information and transit information if agreement is reached with 1.0% centers transit agency for maintenance of information.
Provide pedestrian facilities linking transit stops to
Pedestrian employment site entrances provided such 1.0% facilities * pedestrian facilities do not exceed one-quarter mile.
Pedestrian and bicycle system improvements
Other pedestrian beyond above related measures. Varies
facilities Description attached.
Provide site amenities that reduce the need for
Other site vehicle trips based on documentation of trip 1.0-2.0% amenities reduction. Description attached.
Provide park-and-ride facilities if part of an
Park-and-ride * employee sponsored rideshare program. 1.0% Transportation Provide a local transportation system management system program to reduce on-site trips based on 5.0%
management documentation of expected trip reduction.
program
Provide mixed uses that reduce the length and
number of vehicle trips. Project must consist of
neighborhood serving retail commercial that has at
Mixed uses least five acres of high-density residential housing within one-quarter mile of the perimeter of the 5.0%
commercial site. (Note: Similar trip reduction
measures listed elsewhere cannot be counted
toward the required vehicle trip reduction).
Provide educational and marketing strategies to
Educational and customers to reduce vehicle trips. 1.0% marketing
Provide educational and marketing strategies to
Educational and employees to reduce vehicle trips. * 1.0% marketinir
* Optional traffic management measure (counts toward total if implemented).
Included Vehicle Trip Reduction Total
Check (v) Reduction Permit/Subdivision Conditions (%) (%) All boxes Measure
that avvlv
Provide preferential parking for employees who
Preferential carpool. Sites must be closest to building parking for entrances, used only by carpoolers and represent at 3.0% carpools * least 3 percent of the total parking spaces.
Provide facilities to encourage telecommuting if
Telecommuting * telecommute center could accommodate one 1.0% percent of employees at an off-site neighborhood
location.
Provide on-site ATMs, restaurants, dry cleaners, I .0% per services.
On-site services grocery and other typically needed services to If linked to reduce travel. transit, I .0% for
development
Other Other measures supported by documented data of
trip reductions in other developments. Varies
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND TOURIST ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT TOTAL (Must total 7 percent or more)
* Optional traffic management measure (counts toward total if implemented).
I/we declare under penalty of pe1jury that the information contained in this Facilities Traffic Management Plan, including any attachment included herewith, are true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge.
Signature of Applicant
Signature of Property Owner or
Authorized Agent
Signature of
Planning Manager
Date
Date
Date
January 25, 2024
Thomas Wiles, Senior Planner
City of Salinas
Community Development Department
65 West Alisal Street
Salinas, CA 93901
RE: Environmental Review/Request for
Comments 98 Kip Drive
Dear Mr. Wiles:
Monterey-Salinas Transit District (MST) provides public transportation throughout Monterey County and operates an extensive network in the City of Salinas. MST has reviewed the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for 98 Kip Drive and would like to make the following comments.
This project is located within the vicinity of two (2) existing stops, which currently serve Line 41. Line 41 travels from the Salinas Transit Center to Northridge Mall via East Alisal Street.
This line provides service every 30 minutes on weekdays and hourly on weekends. MST would like to encourage the developer to enroll in MST’s Group Discount Program to offer residents bus passes at a substantially reduced rate. Residential housing complexes serving the elderly and disabled are eligible to pre-purchase bus passes in bulk at a 50% discount.
MST is in support of affordable senior housing at 98 Kip Drive as connecting affordable housing can create a wide range of social and economic benefits. Public transit provides critical connections, especially for transit dependent riders. MST offers free fixed-route travel training to teach interested individuals how to ride the MST bus network safely and independently.
As this project moves forward, we ask that the City of Salinas coordinate with MST during the project’s planning process to ensure adequate transit services are available to residents. If you have any questions about the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] or 831-264-9288.
Sincerely,
Emma Patel
Planning Manager
Serving Monterey, San Benito, and Santa Cruz Counties 24580 Silver Cloud Court Monterey, CA 93940
PHONE: (831) 647-9411 • FAX: (831) 647-8501
Richard A. Stedman, Air Pollution Control Officer
February 9th, 2024
City of Salinas: Community Development Department
Attn: Thomas Wiles, Senior Planner
65 W. Alisal St.
Salinas, CA 93901
Re: St. George’s Senior Apartments
Dear Mr. Wiles
Thank you for providing the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD) with the opportunity to comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study for the St. George’s Senior Apartments Project. MBARD has reviewed the MND/IS and has the following comments:
Air Quality
o Emission Quantification
▪ Emission estimates must be supported with substantial evidence. Please include quantification of the proposed project’s construction and operational emissions, as indicated on pages 6-7 of the initial study, with a comparison to the MBARD’s CEQA thresholds to evaluate the significance of the proposed project’s impact on air quality.
The use of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMOD) is recommended as a tool to evaluate the project’s emissions.
o Fugitive Dust Control
▪ Given the proximity to sensitive receptors, fugitive dust should be mitigated during the construction phase of the project. Compliance with MBARD Rule 402 (Nuisance) and CEQA Guidelines, Section 8.2 can be maintained by implementing the following Best Management Practices as applicable:
• Water all active construction areas at least twice daily. Frequency should be based on the type of operation, soil, and wind exposure. • Prohibit all grading activities during periods of high wind (over 15 mph). • Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, or loose materials. • Cover inactive storage piles.
• Maintain at least 2’0” of freeboard in haul trucks.
• Apply chemical soil stabilizers on inactive construction areas (disturbed lands within construction projects that are unused for at least four consecutive days).
Stationary/Mobile Equipment Emissions
o Required Permits
▪ If a generator, boiler, or other stationary sources of air pollutants are needed to support the construction process or will be installed for use in the operation of the project, a
Richard A. Stedman, Air Pollution Control Officer
permit may be required. Any stationary piston-type internal combustion engine of greater than or equal to 50 brake horsepower (bhp) requires a permit. Please contact MBARD’s Engineering Division if there are any questions regarding the permitting process.
o Construction Equipment
▪ To further reduce construction emissions, MBARD recommends using cleaner than required equipment that conforms to the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) Tier 3 or Tier 4 emission standards. We further recommend that whenever feasible, construction equipment use alternative fuels such as compressed natural gas (CNG), propane, electricity, or biodiesel. This would have the added benefit of reducing diesel exhaust emissions.
Hazardous Materials
o Asbestos Piping
▪ The Air District wants to ensure that if older underground asbestos (Transite) piping is encountered during grading, trenching, or other land disturbing actions during construction, the requirements of MBARD Rule 424 National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) could be triggered. Please contact MBARD’s Compliance Division at (831) 647-9411 for more information regarding this rule.
Greenhouse Gases
o EV Charging Stations
▪ With the growing use of electric vehicles (EV), please consider making public EV charging stations available in the facility’s parking areas. For information about potential electric infrastructure grant funding opportunities, please contact MBARD’s Planning Division at (831) 647-9411.
I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the MND/IS for the St. George’s Senior Apartments Project.
Please let me know if you have any questions. I may be reached at (831) 718-8030 or [email protected].
Regards,
Edward Ballaron
Air Quality Planner I
cc: Rich Stedman, Air Pollution Control Officer
David Frisbey, Planning and Air Monitoring Manager
Shawn Boyle, Planning and Air Monitoring Supervisor
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-095, Version: 1
General Plan Update/Visión Salinas 2040 Land Use and Circulation Study Session No action required. Received report regarding the General Plan Update/Vision Salinas 2024 Land Use and Circulation and provide comments.
City of Salinas Printed on 3/8/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 12, 2024
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FROM: LISA BRINTON, DIRECTOR
THROUGH: GRANT LEONARD, PLANNING MANAGER
BY: JONATHAN MOORE, SENIOR PLANNER
TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/VISION SALINAS 2040 LAND USE
AND CIRCULATION STUDY SESSION
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Receive study session presentation and provide comment.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This report and study session discusses and seeks Council guidance on Land Use and Circulation Elements emerging topics of conversation and identified challenges. Land use and circulation are two of the most important and interrelated topics in the General Plan. The City is considering new Place Type land use designations emphasizing flexible placemaking instead of singular uses. How the City plans for circulation in the City is also changing, due to continued growth, and new state laws around how environmental traffic impacts are measured and focus on balanced transportation systems. Draft Circulation Element policies seek to create a balanced, safe transportation network that contributes to community health and sustainability, while moving people and goods efficiently.
BACKGROUND:
Study Session Purpose:
As staff begins drafting the Visión Salinas 2040 General Plan it is important to keep the Council and community involved. General Plan study sessions are meant to give the Council an opportunity to shape draft policy before the formal adoption process. Land u se and circulation are two of the most legally important and closely related topics in any general plan. Where businesses and housing are located influences how far people must travel and their transportation options. Streets, highways, bike lanes, and paths not only connect destinations, but their size and design also impact how places feel and are experienced by people. Land use and Draft Place Type designations have been discussed at previous Council meetings, including on September 26, 2023. A complete set Page | 2
of draft Land Use and Infrastructure Element and Circulation Element policies which incorporate Steering Committee and stakeholder comments are provided as Attachments 1 and 5 to the staff report.
Land Use Changes and Impacts:
The Draft Place Type designations represent a new direction in land use, focusing on placemaking and prioritizing form instead of use. Place Types respond to community identified needs (see Attachment 3 Land Use Recurring Themes) by increasing flexibility to make the most of limited infill opportunities, with most designations seeing increased, density, height, or allowed uses . By focusing less on strict use found in typical land use designations, the Draft Place Types seek to limit a significant increase in nonconforming uses through increased flexibility. Certain areas may change names but would not experience much change in terms of allowed uses, such as shifts from Business Park to Employment Center, or from Office to Neighborhood Center.
As in any major land use/zoning code update, there is still the possibility of creating nonconforming uses. Nonconforming uses occur when land use and zoning designations change but an existing use continues. The most potential conflicts in allowed uses will come in areas changing to one of the mixed-use designations from industrial/light to industrial areas, and retail areas to a lesser degree. Changes like this are proposed in areas such as the Alisal Marketplace, some large shopping centers, and along major corridors like East Alisal Street and East Market Street.
One of the big differences between the Draft Place Types and current designations are the three kinds of mixed-use designations, plus special Place Types for the downtown and Alisal Marketplace. These are intentionally designed to respect existing context while increasing flexibility and minimizing the friction that could occur from relying on the existing mixed-use land use/zoning designation. Even with this flexibility, auto sales, drive-throughs, industrial, and waste management/recycling may still beco me nonconforming in these areas depending on the Place Type and eventual zoning regulations.
The City is not proposing eminent domain, amortization (timed phase out of uses), or other similar tools to force change. A ny present legal uses/businesses that would become nonconforming through the adoption of the Draft Place Types , would be allowed to remain, and operate without an intensification of use , and would not be forced to relocate or close via land use change.
Currently, Zoning Code Sec. 37 -50.160 does not allow the intensification ( expansion) of nonconforming uses, and limits resumption of the nonconforming use following structural damage or the discontinuation of the nonconforming use for more than 180 days . Draft land use policy calls for creating new nonconforming regulations to protect existing businesses in areas transitioning from light-industrial/commercial to a form of mixed-use (Attachment 1, Action LUI-
1.6.6). This could include pathways for nonconforming uses to expand, lengthening the time allowed to reestablish a similar use, and/or making it easier to resume the use after building damage. This policy demonstrates that the intent behind the Place Types is to open future possibilities, not to force change.
Page | 3
Land Use Engagement:
Staff conducted targeted outreach to businesses in areas of changing land use designations in February, sending over 1,300 postcards to businesses and owners in identified areas with information. Staff also sent more detailed letters (Attachment 2) to over 100 businesses that may become legal nonconforming uses and followed up with direct canvassing. These mailers also invited recipients to three virtual information sessions to discuss changes, held February 27-29, at 7 AM, 11 AM, and 6 PM respectiv ely. Seventy people registered for these sessions and 46 attended. Staff also responded to over 30 calls. Common feedback from the sessions directly included concerns regarding whether proposed land use changes would directly force anyone to move and the feeling that current nonconforming use regulations are too strict.
Land Use and Infrastructure Policy:
The Draft Land Use goals, policies, and actions in Attachment 1 reflect community engagement throughout the General Plan Update, recommendations from ot her recent planning efforts, and Steering Committee review. The draft policies and actions summarized below are organized under three goals:
Goal LUI-1: Support a balanced, diverse, and equitable land use pattern that provides a wide range of jobs, housing, recreation, and services.
Encourage mixed-use development with a blend of housing, businesses, and services. Promote economic development through land use and infrastructure planning.
Goal LUI-2: Ensure that above - and below-ground infrastructure meets the existing and future community needs.
Maintain, improve, and expand flood, water, and sewer systems to meet current and future needs and expand infrastructure financing options.
Increase other infrastructure such as internet/communication systems and green infrastructure.
Goal LUI-3: Support the development and continued evolution of the Salinas Municipal Airport. Encourage development of the airport and surrounding area with compatible businesses and its capacity to support aviation innovation.
Continue to make safety the top priority in and around the airport.
Circulation Element:
Circulation is one of the required elements of a general plan under California state law. It identifies a policy vision to address local transportation needs and defines roadway classifications and locations. According to Government Code Section 65302 (b), a circulation element must show major transportation routes and facilities, plan for a multimodal network, and correlate directly to the land use element. New state laws since the 2002 Salinas General Plan and Circulation Element have changed transportation planning significantly. The Complete Streets Act of 2008 (AB 1358) requires cities and counties to modify their circulation elements to plan for a ba lanced transportation system that meets the needs of all users. SB 743 changed the basis for determining Page | 4
significant environmental impacts from transportation from delay and congestion (level of service/LOS) to vehicle miles traveled (VMT). In response, t he City adopted an Interim VMT Policy in 2020. Both changes aim to improve community health and sustainability, and red uce emissions, by making it easier to use transit, walk, or bike as realistic alternatives. Along with the General Plan, City will be updating its VMT policy and the Traffic Fee Ordinance, which are critical to implementing the Circulation Element.
As Salinas grows, especially with the anticipated buildout of the North of Boronda neighborhoods and other commercial/industrial future growth areas, mitigating VMT and LOS will be challenging. Historically, road widening and constructing new roads were the tools agencies used to reduce congestion. The efficacy of these tools is limited because of induced demand, so Salinas will have to utilize different tools as there is limited space to expand most existing roadways and SB 743 coupled with increasing costs makes bypass construction financially infeasible.
Circulation Engagement:
Circulation and transportation have been important engagement topics throughout the General Plan Update process. From the Council District Land Use meetings, Built Environment Working Group Meetings, Community Design Workshop, and Transportation Survey, staff has heard about many of the circulation challenges and needs of Salinas. Some of the recurring themes summarized in Attachment 4 include:
Significant road and sidewalk maintenance needs.
Safety concerns for all modes (drivers, pedestrians, cyclists, etc.). Traffic congestion makes some local commutes very time consuming. Circulation and freight movement is a major infrastructure concern for the agricultural industry, particularly access to US 101 and the condition of Abbott Street.
Staff is also considering feedback from concurrent transportation planning processes, such as the Active Transportation Plan (ATP) and Alisal Streetscape Masterplan. A list of re curring themes from community engagement is included as Attachment 4 to this staff report.
Draft Circulation Element Policy:
The Draft Circulation Element goals, policies, and actions in Attachment 5 are written to address Salinas’ transportation needs, respond to state direction and law, and reflect recent local circulation planning. The draft policies and actions summarized below are organized under three goals:
Goal C-1: Provide and maintain a safe and integrated circulation system that meets the current and future needs of the community for all modes of travel.
Implement the Vision Zero Action Plan, and other safety improvements. Strive for LOS D and implement systems to reduce peak-hour congestion.
Goal C -2: Create and support sustainable and healthy transportation options that encourage a reduction in single-occupancy vehicle commutes and overall Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Invest in active transportation infrastructure and eliminate gaps in the active transportation network.
Page | 5
Support Monterey-Salinas Transit and other forms of public transportation.
Goal C-3: Support the local economy through a circulation system that moves products safely and efficiently.
Improve freight options and access to major routes.
Improve street maintenance of designated truck routes.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that this administrative report and study session is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability. An Environmental Impact Report is being prepare d for the General Plan Update.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
The General Plan Update itself is specifically reflected in the Strategic Plan as an objective under Effective and Culturally Responsive Government. Proposed General Plan policies such as LUI-1, LUI-1.2, and C-2.3, support the Strategic Plan objectives of “Encouraging transit-oriented housing development” through a more sustainable mix of land uses, increasing density near transit and major corridors, and supporting a robust transit system. Proposed policies LUI-2.2, C-1, and C-2, support Strategic Plan objectives around improving local streets, sidewalks, and city facilities.
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
Community Development Department (CDD) staff is working with Public Works, Library and Community Services, Police, and Fire staff to review draft policies and documents to ensure internal consistency and direction. CDD staff is also working closely with the City Attorney and Meyers Nave, outside spec ial counsel , on the development of the General Plan and related environmental documents.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
There is no cost associated with this study session.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Land Use and Infrastructure Element Goals, Policies, and Actions Page | 6
2. Land Use Postcard and Letter Mailers
3. Land Use Recurring Themes
4. Circulation Recurring Themes
5. Draft Circulation Element Goals, Policies, and Actions
Land Use and Infrastructure
Goal LUI-1: Support a balanced, diverse, and equitable land use pattern that provides a wide range of jobs, housing, recreation, and services.
Policy LUI-1.1: Actively encourage mixed-use
designations and development to increase
sustainability and capacity for housing,
business, services, and alternative modes of
transportation.
Action LUI-1.1.1: Update the zoning code to
include more mixed use districts based on
Place Type designation and emphasize form
over use in these districts.
Action LUI-1.1.2: Facilitate high-quality multi-
family residential development throughout
the city at a variety of densities (accessory
dwellings, missing middle, midrise etc.) to
increase opportunities for attainable and
affordable housing.
Action LUI-1.1.3: Establish and maintain the
Central City as the business, government,
dining, lodging, cultural, and entertainment
center of Salinas. Maintain a compact Central
city core that minimizes distances between
most residential units, offices, stores, and
restaurants.
Action LUI-1.1.4: Group neighborhood
shopping centers, schools, civic and
recreational uses, parks, and public transit
opportunities together to create an activity
center focal point for the neighborhoods they
serve.
Action LUI-1.1.5: Align future land uses with
Economic Opportunity and Target Areas
through appropriate Place Types.
Policy LUI-1.2: Promote and prioritize
redevelopment and revitalization of infill
opportunities to ensure the efficient use of
land and existing infrastructure and services
(e.g., roads, transit, water, sewer, schools,
etc.).
Action LUI-1.2.1: Use the Place Types and
zoning reform to encourage Transit-Oriented
Development (TOD) near major corridors and
destinations.
Action LUI-1.2.2: Evaluate ways to reduce
development costs and/or provide equitable
incentives to encourage development within
existing neighborhoods on underutilized or
disinvested properties, while protecting
against displacement of existing businesses
and residents.
Action LUI-1.2.3: Utilize well-designed infill
development and increase density along
major corridors and Economic Opportunity
Areas.
Policy LUI-1.3: Coordinate public and private
investment along disinvested commercial
corridors and incentivize retrofitting
neighborhood shopping centers.
Action LUI-1.3.1: Identify feasible
underutilized commercial centers and
corridors, designate as an appropriate mixed-
use Place Type, and align Zoning Code with
new designation.
Action LUI-1.3.2: Embrace short-term actions
to populate storefront vacancies and vacant
parcels.
Action LUI-1.3.3: Encourage green retrofits of
parking lots for environmental benefits.
Policy LUI-1.4: Maintain a compact urban
form, locating growth areas in a manner that
mitigates negative impacts of future growth
on environmental quality and quality of life
and minimizes loss of important agricultural
resources, while allowing for the reasonable
expansion of the City to address projected
population growth.
Action LUI-1.4.1: Apply a system of managing
growth based on the timely provision of
public services and facilities and general
thresholds or standards for their adequacy.
Action LUI-1.4.2: Promote vertical urban
expansion in the city core and other
appropriate areas.
Action LUI-1.4.3: Direct most urban expansion
to the North and East, away from the most
productive agricultural land. Encourage
industrial development to locate within the
approved Salinas Ag-Industrial Center Specific
Plan area.
Action LUI-1.4.4: Encourage clustering of
development on sites within the Future
Growth Area to minimize impacts on
agricultural and open space resources.
Action LUI-1.4.5: Lead development of an East
Area Specific Plan.
Action LUI-1.4.6: Continue to require specific
plans prior to development of future growth
areas currently annexed or annexed following
adoption of this plan.
Action LUI-1.4.7: Do not pursue growth into
Economic Reserve Areas until full buildout of
Future Growth/Target Areas. As this buildout
occurs re-evaluate Economic Reserve Area
land use to best meet needs of the
community.
Policy LUI-1.5: Coordinate with local school
districts and other educational organizations.
Action LUI-1.5.1: Work in partnership with
local school districts and assist them in
identifying land needed for new school sites
so that sufficient facilities are provided for
students.
Action LUI-1.5.2: Consider impacts of
proposed projects on school enrollment and
facilities service standards.
Action LUI-1.5.3: Work with Monterey Salinas
Transit to provide transit routes to serve
education institutions.
Policy LUI-1.6: Promote economic
development through focused land use
planning and infrastructure improvements,
and targeted resource expansion.
Action LUI-1.6.1: Use Place Types to reinforce
the strengths of each Economic Opportunity
Area.
Action LUI-1.6.2: Create specific plans or
similar for future development in the Alisal
Marketplace and Carr Lake area.
Action LUI-1.6.3: Complete the
Ferrasci/Target Area K Specific Plan and
implement by incorporating land into the city.
Action LUI-1.6.4: Selectively increase the
supply of land outside of existing City limits
for economic and housing development by
expanding Sphere of Influence to include
Target Areas and exploring future annexation.
Action LUI-1.6.5: Use the Place Types to
increase flexibility in the zoning code to
accommodate innovative economic
development activity.
Action LUI-1.6.6: When updating the zoning
code to implement the Place Types, create a
more flexible non-conforming use policy to
protect existing businesses in areas
transitioning from light-industrial/commercial
to a form of mixed use.
Action LUI 1.6.7: Implement land use and
infrastructure recommendations from recent
community plans (AVP, CRP, DVP, etc.)
Goal LUI-2: Ensure that above- and below-ground infrastructure meets the existing and future community needs.
Policy LUI-2.1: Maintain, improve, and expand
flood, wastewater, and sewer systems to
meet current and anticipated demands.
Action LUI-2.1.1: Actively coordinate and
work with Monterey County Water Resources
Agency (MCWRA) to provide and maintain
necessary flood control facilities and services
to meet the needs of the community.
Continue to work with the MCWRA to
construct Zone 9 Reclamation Ditch
improvements to address flood storage and
discharge issues.
Action LUI-2.1.2: Provide a sewer system that
meets the needs of the community for sewer
collection and treatment and work with
Monterey One Water (M1W) for sewer
treatment needs. Coordinate with M1W for
additional treatment capacity of expanded
sewage disposal needs.
Action LUI-2.1.3: Ensure existing wastewater,
industrial wastewater, and storm drainage
infrastructure systems, including broad
municipal level wastewater and stormwater
solutions for water reuse are maintained and
upgraded to accommodate existing and
future businesses and development.
Action LUI-2.1.4: Continue to work with both
MCWRA and M1W to recycle industrial
wastewater for regional reuse which will in
turn aid in the expansion of the Industrial
Wastewater Treatment Facility.
Action LUI-2.1.5: Review development
proposals to ensure that adequate sewer and
water treatment and recycling facilities,
conveyance systems, and capacity are
available to meet the needs of the
development without negatively impacting
the existing community.
Action LUI-2.1.6: Require new development,
to the extent feasible, to provide flood control
facilities that are visually attractive and
ecologically beneficial, and require on-going
maintenance of the facilities by the
development through a maintenance district.
Apply appropriate development standards
and fees to improve present drainage systems
and provide adequate stormwater detention
basins and sedimentation ponds with new
construction.
Action LUI-2.1.7: Increase pervious surfaces
and encourage sustainable and resilient green
infrastructure such as drought tolerant/native
plantings, bioswales, grey water reuse, etc.
Policy LUI-2.2: Ensure adequate funding for
infrastructure projects through both public
and private sources.
Action LUI-2.2.1: Develop an infrastructure
funding toolkit which describes infrastructure
funding options and mechanisms available to
the City and for partnerships with the private
sector.
Action LUI-2.2.2: Incorporate priority
infrastructure projects into the Capital
Improvement Plan to ensure they are
programmed for funding and implementation
in an appropriate timeframe to meet priority
community objectives.
Action LUI-2.2.3: Work with local and regional
agencies to identify new and expanded
infrastructure requirements and costs to
ensure adequate service capacity to meet the
demands of new development within the
Sphere of Influence.
Action LUI-2.2.4: Pursue public-private
partnerships to increase access to and
potentially fund energy, water, resource
recycling and reuse, dark fiber
communications, green infrastructure, and
other infrastructure capacity.
Goal LUI-3: Support the development and continued evolution of the Salinas Municipal Airport.
Policy LUI-3.1: Encourage development of the
airport in accordance with the Salinas
Municipal Airport Master Plan.
Action LUI-3.1.1: Plan for future airport
operations, considering possible expansion of
airport operations, services, the potential of
Electric Vertical Take Off and Landing (EVTOL)
vehicles, and the proximity of adjacent land
uses.
Action LUI-3.1.2: Encourage development in
the vicinity of the Salinas Municipal Airport
that would not cause land use conflicts,
hazards to aviation, or hazards to the public
and that is in compliance with the California
Airport Land Use Planning Handbook.
Action LUI-3.1.3: Support new compatible or
aviation-related businesses at the Salinas
Municipal Airport and surrounding
commercial areas, including retaining airport
property with direct runway access for uses
directly related to aviation.
Policy LUI-3.2: Within the designated airport
operations area (area within the Airport
proper, which typically includes the aircraft
movement areas), safety shall be the first
consideration and priority shall be given to
construction projects that make this area safe
for aircraft operations.
Action LUI-3.2.1: Maintain open space
adjoining Salinas Municipal Airport in
accordance with the State of California
Airport Land Use Planning Handbook to
ensure safety for the present runway
configurations and for possible future
expansions.
Action LUI-3.2.2: Review development
proposals within areas affected by the
operation of the airport to ensure airport and
land use compatibility, protect the public
safety, and allow for continued aviation
operations. This includes minimizing
residential population increases within the 55
decibel CNEL contour.
Action LUI-3.2.3: Require dedication of an
avigation easement as a condition of
development approval of projects within the
Airport Local Area of Influence. Said avigation
easement shall include special provisions for
properties within the 1-mile clear zone
required for the California International
Airshow.
+
+ +
SALINAS
RICH IN LAND I RICH IN VALUES
+
Para información en español, visite nuestro sitio web o llame al 831-758-7409.
Dear Salinas Business/Property Owners,
As part of the Vision Salinas 2040 General Plan Update, the City is updating its Land Use Element.
The update is intended to make land use more flexible and will help accommodate Salinas’ projected growth. Based on our records, your land designation may be changing.
For more information:
City staff will hold three information sessions via Zoom for business and property owners to learn more about the General Plan Update and future land use changes.
• Session #1: 02/27/24 7 AM
• Session #2: 02/27/24 11 AM
• Session #3: 02/29/24 6 PM
Registration link: bit.ly/LUInfo
Visit our website for the detailed Land Use Map and more information www.visionsalinas.org. scan the QR or give us a call at 831-758-7409.
Thank you. Advanced Planning & Project Implementation.
«Assessee»
«A_Street»
«A_City»«A_State»«A_Zip»
Dear Salinas Business/Property Owners,
As part of the Visión Salinas 2040 General Plan Update, the City is updating its Land Use Element. Land use is part of the General Plan that describes what you can build and what activities can be carried out on a piece of land, such as residential, commercial, industrial, parks, mixed use, etc. The purpose of the Land Use Element is to align the built environment with the community’s long‐range goals for the future. This update is intended to make land use more flexible and will help accommodate Salinas’ projected growth. Based on our records, your land use designation may be changing.
What does this mean?
Some areas of the City will become open to new uses and development opportunities. Existing businesses will be allowed to continue. Some may become ‘legal non‐conforming’ if that use is not allowed under the new designation.
Legal non‐conforming businesses can continue to operate normally unless the property owner decides to change the use or if the use stops for more than 180 days, in which case the previous non‐conforming use cannot resume. However, as part of the General Plan update the City is also exploring establishing new policies that would offer increased flexibility for legal non‐conforming businesses to continue to operate.
Land Use Vs Zoning
Land use is a broader category set by the General Plan, and the Zoning Code is the tool used to implement the General Plan. The Zoning Code sets more detailed regulations, including building heights, setbacks, and specific uses.
The Zoning Code is a separate document that will be updated after the new General Plan is adopted.
Next Steps
Winter/Spring 2024: Continue public engagement
Summer 2024: Release public draft for review
Late 2024: Adopt new General Plan
For more information:
City staff will
hold three information sessions via Zoom for business and property owners to learn more about the General Plan Update and future land use changes.
Session #1: 02/27/24 ‐ 7 AM
Session #2: 02/28/24 ‐ 11 AM
Session #3: 02/29/24 ‐ 6 PM
Registration link: bit.ly/LUInfo
Visit our website for the detailed Land Use map and more information‐ www.visionsalinas.org, or give Monica Gurmilan a call at 831‐758‐7409.
Estimados priopietarios de negocios/propiedades de Salinas,
El uso de terreno se refiere al propósito para el cual se utiliza una parcela de terreno. El uso de terreno refleja la visión más amplia de qué actividades se pueden llevar a cabo, como residencial, comercial, industrial, parque/espacio abierto, uso mixto, etc. Como
parte de la Actualización del Plan General, la Ciudad está actualizando su Elemento de Uso de Terreno. El propósito del Elemento de Uso de Terreno es describir los usos presentes y planificados y su relación con las metas de la comunidad para el futuro. Esta actualización ayudará a adaptarse al crecimiento proyectado de Salinas.
Según nuestros registros, su designación de uso de terreno puede estar cambiando.
¿Qué significa esto?
Algunas áreas de la ciudad estarán abiertas a nuevas oportunidades de desarrollo. Los negocios existentes pueden convertirse en “legal no conformes” si no se les permite bajo la nueva designación del uso de terreno.
Los negocios legales no conformes pueden continuar operando normalmente a menos que el dueño de la propiedad decida cambiar el uso o si el uso se detiene por más de 180 días, en cuyo caso el uso no puede renovarse. La Ciudad también está explorando establecer nuevas políticas que ofrecerían una mayor flexibilidad para que las empresas que no cumplen con las leyes continúen operando.
Uso de Terreno versus la Zonificación
La zonificación es una herramienta que se utiliza para regular el uso del terreno mediante la implementación de varias reglas y regulaciones. Esas regulaciones incluyen
alturas de edificios, alineaciones, densidad, usos permitidos, etc. El propósito de la zonificación es guiar el desarrollo en una manera que se conforme con los objetivos de la Ciudad. El Código de Zonificación se actualizará tras la adopción del nuevo Plan General.
Próximos Pasos
Invierno/primavera de 2024: Continuar con la participación pública Verano 2024: Publicar borrador público para repaso
Finales de 2024: Adoptar un nuevo Plan General
For more information:
Reúnase con el personal de Desarrollo Comunitario para obtener más información sobre el Elemento de Uso de Terreno.
Sesión #1: 02/27/24 ‐ 7 AM
Sesión
#2 02/27/24 ‐ 11 AM
Sesión #3: 02/27/24 ‐ 6 PM
Enalce de registro: bit.ly/LUInfo
Visite nuestro sitio web para obtener un mapa detallado del uso del terreno y más información: ‐ www.visionsalinas.org, or llame a Monica Gurmilan, 831‐758‐7409.
Recurring Themes - Land Use
• More land dedicated to (or allowing) housing
• More affordable housing (for all income levels)
• Better maintenance of infrastructure (roads, sidewalks, lighting, etc.) • Better maintenance of City facilities (libraries, recreation centers, Sherwood Hall, etc.) • Sidewalk friendly trees
• More restaurants, cafes, “third places”
o For all age groups
o Indoor/outdoor
• More shopping options (grocery)
• Better roadway planning (shared-uses, safety)
• Need more green infrastructure
• Need space for community event/gatherings
• More open space/green space/parks in new development
• Need a recreation center in all districts in the City • Fill empty space throughout the City (K-Mart, Sears, Chinatown, etc.) • Improve bike and pedestrian infrastructure (protected/separated bike lanes, crosswalks) • Better street cleaning
• Look into different housing developments (courtyard/bungalows like on Pajaro and Riker streets • More density and walkable communities
o Mixed-use
• Use native plants in landscape/green projects
• Community garden
• New housing should be near existing services
Recurring Themes – Circulation
• Need road improvements throughout the city—potholes, repaving, lane restriping, lighting • Traffic calming around schools, parks, public facilities • Be careful of traffic calming hurting circulation around city • Boronda Rd needs more attention—high traffic volumes, poor conditions • Roundabouts to improve traffic flow
• Many abandoned streets disturb traffic flow/street cleaning/create blight • Need better maintenance/cleaning of roads/sidewalks/trails • Improve pedestrian network throughout City—flashing crosswalks, sidewalks (many ruined by trees), trails, lighting, safety, tree canopy
• Improve bike network—safety, convenience, protected/separated facilities • Traffic speed/amount and bike lanes not feeling safe are barriers to cycling • In new developments/road expansions: focus on improving conditions for Active Transportation • Currently gaps in bike/pedestrian network
• Encourage alternative modes of transit: bike share network, land-use decisions • Damaged sidewalks and unsafe crossings are barriers to walking more • Need more safety/enforcement on streets: accidents, high traffic volumes, high speeds • Pedestrians/bikers don’t feel safe (crime, violence, homeless) on trails especially at night • Train connection to Bay Area
• Improve transit connections with local cities
• Is there still a Transportation Committee?
• Free public transit
• Trail network throughout City using creeks/Carr Lake
• Better connection for bikes/pedestrians over Highway 101 • Ensure necessary services (health, jobs, stores, resources) are walking/biking distance for residents
• Ensure safety for all ages/abilites
Circulation
Goal C-1: Provide and maintain a safe and integrated circulation system that meets the current and future needs of the community for all modes of travel.
Policy C-1.1: Design and maintain safe
streets.
Action C-1.1.1: Use traffic calming methods within
residential areas where necessary to create a
pedestrian-friendly circulation system.
Action C-1.1.2: Continue to enforce traffic laws,
including those addressing bicycle and pedestrian
traffic, to ensure a circulation system that is safe for motorized, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic.
Action C-1.1.3: Strive to maintain traffic Level of
Service (LOS) D or better for all intersections and
roadways.
Action C-1.1.4: Implement Vision Zero Plan
recommendations and invest in safer transportation
infrastructure for pedestrians, cyclists, and other
modes of travel.
Action C-1.1.5: Minimize potential safety conflict
between trucks and freight transportation and other
transportation network users.
Policy C-1.2: Improve regional and
intra city road, rail, and air logistics
and connections.
Action C-1.2.1: Work with other local jurisdictions and regional agencies to develop, implement, and
improve regional transit projects and transportation
systems including a countywide approach to
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and
Transportation Systems Management (TSM) to
reduce peak-hour vehicle trips and congestion at
major employment centers.
Action C-1.2.2: Strive for a regional jobs-housing
balance to reduce vehicle miles traveled and
congestion on the regional circulation system.
Action C-1.2.3: Continue efforts to reduce adverse
impacts of truck traffic and parking in non-industrial
areas while recognizing on the local economic
importance of freight and logistics and responding to
industry needs.
Action C-1.2.3: Coordinate funding, planning, and/or
implementation for critical transportation
infrastructure and facility needs throughout the
Salinas Valley.
Action C-1.2.4: Improve connectivity and access
within the City through efforts to implement the
Downtown Vibrancy Plan and improve broader access
to downtown with the rail station, Chinatown, Alisal
Market Place, and Carr Lake.
Policy C-1.3: Promote proper capacity
and traffic flow on City streets.
Action C-1.3.1: Utilize roundabouts, where feasible,
to promote improved traffic operations and to enrich
the driving experience. Utilize the center of the
roundabouts for public art and landscaping.
Action C-1.3.2: Design roadway capacities to
adequately serve planned land uses. Discourage
diversion of traffic to local streets by providing
capacity on arterial streets and locating high traffic- generating uses on or near arterial frontages.
Action C-1.3.3: Reduce the number of existing
driveways on arterial streets whenever possible for
reuse/revitalization projects to improve traffic flow.
Action C-1.3.4: Continue to require new development
to contribute to the financing of street
improvements, including formation of roadway
maintenance assessment districts, required to meet
the demand generated by the project.
Action C-1.3.5: Encourage removal of “back out”
parking on major roads from non-residential uses.
Goal C-2: Create and support sustainable and healthy transportation options that encourage a reduction in single-occupancy vehicle commuting and overall Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).
Policy C-2.1: Provide and maintain
safe routes to school, work, shopping,
and recreation for pedestrians.
Action C-2.1.1: Improve the walking environment by
increasing the availability of safe, attractive, and well- maintained sidewalks, cut-throughs, landscaping, use
of traffic-calming devices on local streets, adequate
pedestrian separation from automobile traffic and
the inclusion of pedestrian-scaled amenities such as
lighted crosswalks and increased lighting along
sidewalks in all areas of the City.
Action C-2.1.2: Ensure that all pedestrian route
improvements meet with ADA standards for
accessibility.
Action C-2.1.3: Encourage parking lot designs that
promote pedestrian access and safety.
Policy C-2.2: Provide and maintain an
extensive public bicycle network with
safe and equitable on-street and off-
street facilities.
Action C-2.2.1: Continue to develop a safe and
attractive network of on- and off-street bicycle routes to encourage and facilitate the use of bicycles for
commuting, recreation, and other trips. Eliminate
gaps and provide connections between existing
bicycle routes.
Action C-2.2.2: Ensure that all pedestrian and bicycle
route improvements meet the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) standards for accessibility, and Caltrans standards for design.
Action C-2.2.3: Increase availability of facilities by
encouraging existing businesses and requiring new
construction to provide on-premise facilities, such as
safe short-term and long-term bicycle parking.
Action C-2.2.3: Create an interconnected active
transportation network by developing off-street trails
throughout Salinas along creeks/waterways and
through parks that integrate with on-street bicycle
and pedestrian infrastructure.
Action C-2.2.4: Explore extending a trail network
outside of Salinas that connects with regional
recreation opportunities.
Policy C-2.3: Promote and maintain an
efficient, reliable, and equitable public
transportation network, that provides
a feasible alternative to driving.
Action C-2.3.1: Support continued maintenance and
expanded use of the Intermodal Transportation
Center
Action C-2.3.2: Support Monterey-Salinas Transit
initiatives to provide adequate and improved (e.g.,
more frequent availability and use of Intelligent
Transportation System measures where appropriate)
public transportation service.
Action C-2.3.3: Promote public transportation that is
bike- and pedestrian-friendly by encouraging buses
with bicycle racks at public transportation stations
and for all new or modified bus stops to take
pedestrian access into consideration.
Action C-2.3.4: Design development and
reuse/revitalization projects to be transit-oriented to promote the use of alternative modes of transit and
support higher levels of transit service.
Action C-2.3.5: Continue providing support to TAMC
to provide commuter rail service to the Silicon Valley
and other major destinations to provide alternatives
to automobile use.
Action C-2.3.6: Encourage private businesses and
organizations to work with MST to subsidize transit
for their employees/members.
Goal C-3: Support the local economy through a circulation system that moves products safely and efficiently.
Policy C-3.1: Improve transportation
infrastructure necessary for efficient
freight logistics.
Action C-3.1.1: Coordinate with state and regional
partners on improving truck access to U.S. 101 in
Salinas and at the Abbott Street interchange
southeast of the City’s boundary.
Action C-3.1.2: Improve street maintenance of
designated truck routes.
Action C-3.1.3: Support freight movement via rail and
other alternatives if feasible.
Action C-3.1.4: Minimize the need for freight loading
and unloading on public streets when designing new
industrial or commercial developments or road
configurations.
City Council
March 12, 2024
Land Use and Circulation
Study Session
Study session purpose
Give Council an opportunity to shape draft policy
Share update on land use engagement
Land use and circulation are closely related as topics and in state law
Lancaster CA street transformation. Photos from CNU
Draft Place Type Map
Areas of Use Change
Draft Place Type Map Current Land Use
Land Use Engagement
1,300+ postcards
100+ letters to businesses that may
become nonconforming
Follow-up direct canvassing
Three virtual information sessions
Feedback
Concerns over if the change would
directly force anyone to move (no)
Current nonconforming use
regulations are too strict
Positive comments on increased
flexibility
Legal Nonconforming Uses
Current zoning code -Legal non‐conforming businesses can continue to operate normally unless the property owner decides to change the use or if the use stops for more than 180 days, in which case the previous non‐conforming use cannot resume. They cannot expand the nonconforming use.
Draft action LUI-1.6.6: Create a more flexible nonconforming use policy to protect existing businesses in areas transitioning from light-industrial or commercial to a form of mixed use.
Draft Place Types are intended to be more context-sensitive and flexible, to create less nonconforming uses while allowing new ones.
Land Use and Infrastructure Policies
Goal LU-1:- Support a balanced, diverse, and equitable land use pattern that provides a wide range of jobs, housing, recreation, and services. Policies promoting mixed use and new housing, coordinating investment on underserved corridors, and economic development through land use. Goal LU-2: Ensure that above- and below-ground infrastructure meets the existing and future community needs.
Policies on maintaining/improving flood, sewer, wastewater systems, and other infrastructure.
Goal LU-3: Support the development and continued evolution of the Salinas Municipal Airport.
Policies encouraging development, safety, and compatibility of the airport.
Circulation recurring themes
Significant road and sidewalk maintenance
needs throughout the city.
Safety for all modes of tranport.
Traffic congestion is lowering quality of life.
Need to make it more convenient and safer
to use alternative modes of transportation.
Circulation and freight movement is a
major infrastructure concern for ag
industry, particularly Abbott Street
condition and Hwy 101 access.
Circulation Element Background
• Transportation vision and
policies
• Identifies major
transportation routes and
facilities
• Defines roadway
classifications and what they
should look like
Changes to state law
AB 32 (2006) – Global Warming Solutions Act
SB 743 (2013)
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Change from level of service (LOS) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) AB 1358 (2008) Complete Streets Act
SB 1000 (2016) Environmental Justice
Bypasses infeasible financially and
sustainably
Mitigation costs nearly equal to
construction
Outside of current boundaries
Land acquisition costs/additional
mitigation for loss of farmland
Politically would have to get landowners,
County, LAFCO, TAMC, and state on board
Environmental harm
Induced demand
Vehicle Miles Traveled Projections
Proposed land use changes help mitigate VMT growth per capita, but we will still have to find ways to bring overall numbers down
2019 vs 2040 Volume to Capacity
VMT Mitigation options
Active Transportation
Transit (MST)
Travel Demand Measures – (car/vanpool,
transit passes, remote work)
VMT banking/fee mitigation
Circulation Element Draft Policies
Goal C-1: Provide and maintain a safe and integrated circulation system that meets the current and future needs of the community for all modes of travel.
Policies to implement Vision Zero and other safety measures, improve congestion and connectivity.
Goal C-2: Create and support sustainable and healthy transportation options that encourage a reduction in single-occupancy vehicle commuting and overall Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).
Policies for improving and investing in active transportation and transit and coordinating with regional partners such as MST and TAMC. Goal C-3: Support the local economy through a circulation system that moves products safely and efficiently.
Policies to support logistics, improve access to 101 and maintenance of truck routes. 2024 Upcoming Engagement and Review
• General Plan Open House and
Climate Action Plan Webinar
in Spring 2024
• City Council and Planning
Commission study sessions
• Draft General Plan early
summer, draft EIR and CAP
late summer
Questions & Comments
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-143, Version: 1
Minutes
Approve minutes of February 17, 2024, February 20, 2024, February 27, 2024, and March 5, 2024.
City of Salinas Printed on 3/8/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-136, Version: 1
Financial Claims
Approve financial claim report.
City of Salinas Printed on 3/8/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
473171 02/27/2024 Open First American Title Company $143.50 473172 02/27/2024 Open State of California Dept of Food & Agriculture $1,000.00 473173 02/29/2024 Open Alexis Mejia $90.00
473174 02/29/2024 Open Alexis Uribe $138.00
473175 02/29/2024 Open Carlos Pimentel $241.28
473176 02/29/2024 Open Cenovio Zamora-Duarte $295.00
473177 02/29/2024 Open Christopher Knapp $123.28
473178 02/29/2024 Open David Furey $161.25
473179 02/29/2024 Open David Hernandez $138.00
473180 02/29/2024 Open Gregory Hurst $210.00
473181 02/29/2024 Open Henry Martinez $118.00
473182 02/29/2024 Open Jeffrey Alford $351.00
473183 02/29/2024 Open Michele Houston $407.00
473184 02/29/2024 Open Patricia Barajas $174.42
473185 02/29/2024 Open Pierce Manufacturing Inc $6,930.00 473186 02/29/2024 Open Robert Asamoto $241.28
473187 02/29/2024 Open Robert Marques $161.25
473188 02/29/2024 Open Sean Valenzuela $228.75
473189 02/29/2024 Open Shane VanderVeen $138.00
473190 02/29/2024 Open South Bay Regional Public Safety $400.00 473191 02/29/2024 Open Tanya Crawford $407.00
473192 02/29/2024 Open Fresno City College $119.00
473193 02/29/2024 Open LEIU Training $750.00
473194 02/29/2024 Open LEIU Training $750.00
473195 02/29/2024 Open Ace Hardware $138.24
473196 02/29/2024 Open Action Council of Monterey County, Inc. $2,450.00 473197 02/29/2024 Open Alco Water $6,256.36
473198 02/29/2024 Open Alhambra and Sierra Spring DS Waters of America LP $428.18 473199 02/29/2024 Open Alhambra and Sierra Spring DS Waters of America LP $276.27 473200 02/29/2024 Open American Supply Company $2,288.87 473201 02/29/2024 Open American Textile and Supply Inc $2,205.90 473202 02/29/2024 Open American Traffic Solutions Inc. $12,503.07 473203 02/29/2024 Open Amerigas $1,432.45
473204 02/29/2024 Open Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Group, Inc $719.41 473205 02/29/2024 Open Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Group, Inc $33.85 473206 02/29/2024 Open Asap Alisal Signs And Printing $4,540.17 473207 02/29/2024 Open AT and T $17,032.66
473208 02/29/2024 Open Bear Electrical Solutions Inc $588.50 473209 02/29/2024 Open Benitez Security Services, Inc $53,943.00 473210 02/29/2024 Open BFS Landscape Architects $29,103.76 473211 02/29/2024 Open Blancas Construction, Inc. $475.00 473212 02/29/2024 Open Brodart Company $81.56
473213 02/29/2024 Open California Water Service $626.56 General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 2/27/2024 - To Payment Date: 3/6/2024 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 1 of 4 Wednesday, March 6, 2024 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 2/27/2024 - To Payment Date: 3/6/2024 473214 02/29/2024 Open Canine Development Group Inc dba PACKTRACK $140.00 473215 02/29/2024 Open Carollo Engineers, Inc $12,689.00 473216 02/29/2024 Open Carollo Engineers, Inc $14,133.50 473217 02/29/2024 Open CDW Government LLC $19,716.44
473218 02/29/2024 Open Central Coast Systems Inc $105.00 473219 02/29/2024 Open Cintas $1,342.66
473220 02/29/2024 Open Civica Law Group, APC $21,218.90 473221 02/29/2024 Open Coast Automotive Warehouse Inc $140.21 473222 02/29/2024 Open Comcast (Business) $621.79
473223 02/29/2024 Open Community Homeless Solutions $15,395.01 473224 02/29/2024 Open Condor Security Of America Inc $4,231.08 473225 02/29/2024 Open CSG Consultants $9,477.00
473226 02/29/2024 Open Duraid Mohammed dba HA Construction $49,406.48 473227 02/29/2024 Open East Bay Tire Company $1,008.56
473228 02/29/2024 Open Efrain Contreras dba Century Metals, LLC $210.00 473229 02/29/2024 Open EMC Planning Group Inc $4,973.43 473230 02/29/2024 Open Fastenal Company $1,906.65
473231 02/29/2024 Open Ferguson US Hodings, Inc dba Ferguson Enterprises $20.75 473232 02/29/2024 Open First Alarm $7,056.25
473233 02/29/2024 Open Fresno Oxygen & Welding Suppliers, Inc. $122.10 473234 02/29/2024 Open Glasswork by Design $1,100.00
473235 02/29/2024 Open Golden State Truck and Trailer Repair $11,934.11 473236 02/29/2024 Open Goldfarb and Lipman $952.00
473237 02/29/2024 Open Granite Rock Co $1,497.08
473238 02/29/2024 Open Green Rubber Kennedy Ag $1,471.69 473239 02/29/2024 Open Griffin Structures, Inc $39,242.20 473240 02/29/2024 Open Harris and Associates $71,754.59 473241 02/29/2024 Open Hayden Parker $37.00
473242 02/29/2024 Open Home Depot Credit Services $3,028.38 473243 02/29/2024 Open Ingram Book Company $67.32
473244 02/29/2024 Open Interstate Battery System Inc $139.61 473245 02/29/2024 Open Johnson Associates $1,588.11
473246 02/29/2024 Open JS Inc dba Steinbeck Lodge $107,100.00 473247 02/29/2024 Open Kanco Inc. / Mighty Auto Parts $52.24 473248 02/29/2024 Open Katharine G Bristol dba Kate Bristol Consulting $2,200.00 473249 02/29/2024 Open Kimley Horn And Assoc Inc $3,312.50 473250 02/29/2024 Open Kurt Ashley dba Secure Solutions $4,542.68 473251 02/29/2024 Open L.C. Action $2,005.22
473252 02/29/2024 Open L.N. Curtis & Sons $1,054.88
473253 02/29/2024 Open Lawrence F Conte dba Aaron Overhead Doors $5,085.00 473254 02/29/2024 Open Lawson Products, Inc $468.80
473255 02/29/2024 Open League Of California Cities $300.00 473256 02/29/2024 Open League Of California Cities $1,575.83 user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 2 of 4 Wednesday, March 6, 2024 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 2/27/2024 - To Payment Date: 3/6/2024 473257 02/29/2024 Open Leon De Asis $2,000.00
473258 02/29/2024 Open Life Assist $204.24
473259 02/29/2024 Open Lisa Marie Vetter dba Tour de force Speakers $7,650.00 473260 02/29/2024 Open Martin Sandoval dba Lock Stock N' Barrel $87.18 473261 02/29/2024 Open Matthew G Norton Co dba NWB Salinas LLC $301.00 473262 02/29/2024 Open Meyers and Nave $202.00
473263 02/29/2024 Open Miracle Playsystems, Inc. $84,358.00 473264 02/29/2024 Open MNS Engineers, Inc $10,172.50
473265 02/29/2024 Open Monterey County The Herald $790.04 473266 02/29/2024 Open Monterey County The Herald $523.88 473267 02/29/2024 Open Monterey Transfer and Storage Inc $125.50 473268 02/29/2024 Open My Jeep $851.03
473269 02/29/2024 Open New Image Landscape Company $400.00 473270 02/29/2024 Open Norcal Contractor $603,479.42
473271 02/29/2024 Open O'Reilly Auto Parts $22.43
473272 02/29/2024 Open Office Depot Business Service Division $970.35 473273 02/29/2024 Open Omega Industrial Supply Inc $1,708.20 473274 02/29/2024 Open One Workplace L Ferrari, LLC dba Peninsula Busines $4,495.38 473275 02/29/2024 Open Pacific Coast Flag $2,059.76
473276 02/29/2024 Open Pacific Gas and Electric Company $4,702.33 473277 02/29/2024 Open PJ Trucking Academy LLC $5,000.00 473278 02/29/2024 Open RDO Equipment Company $39.61
473279 02/29/2024 Open RELX Inc. dba LexisNexis, Division of RELX Inc. $3,094.05 473280 02/29/2024 Open Republic Services, Inc dba Allied Waste Services $2,294.84 473281 02/29/2024 Open Russell Auria Pest Control Services $345.00 473282 02/29/2024 Open Salinas Valley Ford Inc $154.48
473283 02/29/2024 Open San Lorenzo Lumber $390.98
473284 02/29/2024 Open Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP $10,956.00 473285 02/29/2024 Open Shieldspike LLC $5,285.00
473286 02/29/2024 Open Smart and Final Iris $2,240.89
473287 02/29/2024 Open Smith and Enright Landscaping $51,279.67 473288 02/29/2024 Open Steven Rogers dba ProTech $10,465.49 473289 02/29/2024 Open Stommel Inc dba Lehr $11,940.22
473290 02/29/2024 Open Sturdy Oil Company $4,316.47
473291 02/29/2024 Open Summit Uniforms, LLC dba Summit Uniforms $510.78 473292 02/29/2024 Open Sylvia Marie Ayala $425.00
473293 02/29/2024 Open Target Pest Control $485.00
473294 02/29/2024 Open The Sherwin-Williams Co $1,021.44 473295 02/29/2024 Open Thomson-West/Barclays $347.69
473296 02/29/2024 Open Tri County Fire Protection $126.00 473297 02/29/2024 Open TS Government Solutions LLC $1,298.00 473298 02/29/2024 Open U.S. Bank National Association ND $13,061.71 473299 02/29/2024 Open United Parcel Service $150.39
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 3 of 4 Wednesday, March 6, 2024 Number Date Status Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
General Account - General Account
Check
City of Salinas
Payment Register
From Payment Date: 2/27/2024 - To Payment Date: 3/6/2024 473300 02/29/2024 Open United Site Services $375.10
473301 02/29/2024 Open Valley Center Bowl $1,090.93
473302 02/29/2024 Open Valley Fabrication Inc $1,005.10 473303 02/29/2024 Open Valley Saw Shop $502.50
473304 02/29/2024 Open Vanguard $50,722.03
473305 02/29/2024 Open W W Grainger Inc $577.94
473306 02/29/2024 Open Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP $27,243.69 473307 02/29/2024 Open Walmart c/o Capitol One $540.59 473308 02/29/2024 Open Worldpac $167.52
473309 02/29/2024 Open Amelia Reid Aviation LLC dba Aerodynamic Aviation $57.50 473310 02/29/2024 Open Reyna Balderas $363.25
473311 02/29/2024 Open Timothy and Jennifer Bergholz $161.00 473312 03/04/2024 Open PNC Equipment Finance, LLC $124,848.95 473313 03/04/2024 Open U.S. Bank National Association ND $19,884.59 $1,651,136.51Type Check Totals:
General Account - General Account Totals
user: Josephine Fernandez Pages: 4 of 4 Wednesday, March 6, 2024 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-082, Version: 1
Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project (CIP 9346) Contract Change Orders Approve a Resolution approving Contract Change Orders 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 to the HA Construction contract for the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project (CIP 9346) in the amount $39,465.19; increase in the Project’s contingency of $44,070.81; and authorize the Interim City Manager or designee to execute any necessary revisions, amendments and/or change orders applicable to the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project.
City of Salinas Printed on 3/8/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 12, 2024
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FROM: LISA BRINTON, DIRECTOR
THROUGH FRANCISCO BRAMBILA, ACTING PLANNING MANAGER
BY: LUIS OCHOA, SR. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANALYST
TITLE: CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS FOR
NATIVIDAD CREEK PARK RESTROOM REHABILITATION
PROJECT (CIP 9346)
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing:
1. Contract Change Orders 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 to the HA Construction contract for the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project (CIP 9346) in the amount $39,465.19; and
2. an increase in the Project’s contingency of $44,070.81 for the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project (CIP 9346); and
3. the City Manager or designee to execute any necessary revisions, amendments and/or change orders applicable to the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project as needed.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
During Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project construction activities, the General Contractor uncovered previously unknown conditions with the Project and project site. Also, design elements of the Project needed to be adjusted and/or were missed during the design phase. Change Orders will require an i ncrease of the construction contract amount with HA Construction for the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project (CIP 9346) (Project) to $220,355.19 and an increase of $44,070.8 in contingency funds to support any additional change orders through Project completion. The proposed Change Orders and additional funds could increase the total construction cost to $264,426.00, which is funded with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program funds.
BACKGROUND:
The Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project (CIP 9346 ; Project) secured funding through the City’s HUD CDBG entitlement allocation through its FY 2019-20 Annual Action Plan Page | 2
(AAP). The proposed rehabilitation work on this Project includes interior and exterior improvements to the restroom facility as well as necessary ADA upgrades and site improvements to include the addition of two new ADA compliant parking spaces at the Natividad Creek Park. On June 20, 2023, City Council approved Resolution No. 22724 accepting the bid and awarding the Project to HA Construction. The Construction Contract for this Project was fully executed on September 20, 2023, and the Project started construction on November 20, 2023.
During construction activities, the General Contractor uncovered previously unknow n conditions with the Project and project site. Also, design elements of the Project needed to be adjusted and/or were missed during the design phase. The list below indicates the nature, reason, and amount of the change orders on this project:
Change Orders Reason Status Price
1 Permit Fee Increase Fee Increased Approved $ 173.00
2 Building Fumigation & Re-
sheathing Roof
Unknown Project
Condition
Approved $ 29,717.00
3 Men's Urinal Drain Camera and
Cleaning
Unknown Project
Condition
Pending $ 1,263.62
4 Women's Partitions (4 units) Not In Original Design Pending $ 16,348.80 5 Women's Restroom Side Drainage Unknown Site
Condition
Pending $ 7,401.94
6 Anti-Graffiti Coating for Interior
and Exterior
Not In Original Design Pending $ 8,467.61
7 Locker Door Armor Installation Not In Original Design Pending $ 3,186.02 8 Roof Repair Materials Unknown Project
Condition
Pending $ 2,797.20
Total of Change Orders $ 69,355.19
The original construction contract with HA Construction was for $151,000; however, City Council approved a not to exceed amount of $181,200 for the project , which included a construction contingency of $30,200. Change Orders 1 and 2 have been approved and were covered using the existing contingency. Change orders 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, totaling $39,465.19, necessitate the amount of the construction contract with HA Construction be increased to $220,355.19, and add $44,070.81 in contingency to the overall Project cost to support any additional change orders through Project completion. This could increase the total construction cost to $264,426.00.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Categorical Exemptions. The City of Salinas determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities, Class I (a)(c)(d)(g) as the Project proposes rehabilitation of an existing public restroom facility. The Notice of Exemption was completed and filed with the County of Monterey on April 6, 2021.
Page | 3
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
The proposed Project supports the City of Salinas Strategic Plan 2022-2025 Goals and Strategies of Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, Public Safety, and Youth and Seniors through the provision of quality public facilities accessible to all residents.
DEPARTMENT COORDINATION:
This Project continues to involve significant inter -departmental coordination inclusive of the Community Development, Library and Community Services, Finance, and Public Works departments as well as the City Attorney. CDD staff maintain direct oversight of the Project’s construction and completion through an assigned Project Management consultant.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
The proposed change orders and contingency set aside for the Project will be funded by an available appropriation from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program funds. There will be no impact to the General Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Resolution No. 22724
Change Orders 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL APPROVING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8 TO HA CONSTRUCTION FOR THE NATIVIDAD CREEK PARK RESTROOM REHABILITATION PROJECT (CIP 9346)
WHEREAS, through its HUD FY 2019-20 Annual Action Plan, the Salinas City Council allocated CDBG Entitlement Funds towards the rehabilitation of the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project - CIP 9346 (Project); and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2023, through Resolution No. 22724, City Council accepted the bid and award ed the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project (CIP 9346) to HA Construction in the amount of $151,000; and
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2023, the Construction Contract for the Project was fully executed; and
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2023, the Project started construction; and
WHEREAS, as the General Contractor started construction, unknown conditions were uncovered with the Project and Project site as well as design elements that needed to be adjusted and/or were missed during the design phase; and
WHEREAS, the Project had a construction contingency of $30,200 which allowed the project manager, Community Development Director, City Engineer, and Interim City Manager to approve Contract Change Orders 1 and 2; and
WHEREAS, Change Orders 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, require the construction contract with HA Construction to be increased to $220,355.19; and
WHEREAS, the Project’s construction contingency will also need to be increased to $44,070.81, to support any additional change orders through Project completion; and
WHEREAS, with the increased Project contingency, Contract Change Orders (1 through 8), and the original construction contract with HA Construction, the total construction cost will be increased to $264,426.00; and
WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities, Class I (a)(c)(d)(g) as the Project proposes rehabilitation of an existing public restroom facility; and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 2021 , the CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Project was completed and filed with the County of Monterey; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves Contract Change Orders 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 to the HA Construction contract for the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project (CIP 9346) in the amount $39,465.19; and 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves an increase of the Project’s contingency to $ 44,070.81, for the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project (CIP 9346); and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute any necessary revisions, amendments and/or change orders applicable to the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project as needed.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED:
________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
1 RESOLUTION NO. 22724 (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL FOR THE NATIVIDAD CREEK PARK RESTROON REHABILITATION PROJECT - CIP 9346 BID ACCEPTANCE,
PROJECT AWARD, AND EXECUTION OF AN AGREMENENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF SALINAS AND HA CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, through its HUD FY 2019-20 Annual Action Plan, the Salinas City Council allocated CDBG Entitlement Funds towards the rehabilitation of the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project - CIP 9346 (Project); and WHEREAS, on December 17, 2023, the City published an initial Request for Proposals and received a total of three bids by the stipulated deadline of January 17, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on April 4, 2023, following a thorough review of proposals, City Council were advised by CDD staff that two proposals were deemed incomplete and disqualified from consideration and moved to reject the one remaining proposal due to a proposed amount 148% higher than the Project Engineer’s estimate; and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2023 , the City issued a second Project RFP with a submission deadline of May 9, 2023 and received no bids; and
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2023, following a review of CDBG regulations and consultation with the City Attorney, City staff initiated contact with two previous RFP respondents , HA Construction and Stellar BG Inc., to directly solicit updated Project bid proposals by June 6, 2023; and
WHEREAS, HA Construction was the only respondent to the City’s direct solicitation providing a proposal well below the Engineer’s estimate for the project in the amount of $151,000; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of potential unforeseen issues that may arise during construction of the Project, the City desires to ensure an adequate amount of funds are made available by including an additional 20% contingency amount in the Project’s budget to support the timely completion of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities, Class I (a)(c)(d)(g) as the Project proposes rehabilitation of an existing public restroom facility; and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 2021 the CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Project was completed and filed with the County of Monterey.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council accepts the bid from HA Construction for the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project as being the lowest and best bid; and
DocuSign Envelope ID: E220CB66-CF7F-4BAF-8CEA-1944D13C8B6D 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Salinas City Council awards the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project – CIP 9346 to HA Construction and authorizes the execution of an Agreement Between the City of Salinas and HA Construction in an amount not to exceed $181,200, inclusive of the $151,000 bid amount an d an approved 20% contingency of $30,200; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Salinas City Council approves an increase of up to $181,200 to the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project - CIP 9346 (Project) appropriation(s); and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Salinas City Council approves a transfer of up to $181,200 from the Community Development Fund to the CIP Fund (CIP 9346); and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Salinas City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute the Agreement Between the City of Salinas and HA Construction and any necessary revisions, amendments and/or change orders applicable to the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project as needed.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 20th day of June 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Barrera, Gonzalez, McShane, Osornio, Rocha and Mayor Craig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Sandoval
ABSTAIN: None
APPROVED:
________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: E220CB66-CF7F-4BAF-8CEA-1944D13C8B6D
),1$/&+$1*(25'(5
&LW\RI6DOLQDV
5HY 3DJHRI
&+$1*(25'(5
'DWH
3URMHFW
1DWLYLGDG&UHHN3DUN
&KDQJH2UGHU
2ZQHU
&,7<2)6$/,1$6
&RQWUDFWRU
+$&RQVWUXFWLRQ
7<3(2)&+$1*(25'(5
&KHFNRQH
(UURUVDQG2PLVVLRQV
8QIRUHVHHQ6LWH&RQGLWLRQ
-XVWLILFDWLRQDWWDFKHG
2ZQHU$XWKRUL]DWLRQ
$XWKRUL]DWLRQDWWDFKHG
(PHUJHQF\
$XWKRUL]DWLRQDWWDFKHG
'HVFULSWLRQRI&KDQJH
7KHIROORZLQJ3URSRVHG&KDQJH2UGHU
V
DUHLQFRUSRUDWHGLQWRWKH&RQWUDFWE\UHIHUHQFH
5HI 6XPPDU\'HVFULSWLRQ
$PRXQW
7KHFRQWUDFWSHUPLWIHHOLVWHGLQWKHELGSURSRVDOLV 7KHFRQWUDFWRUSDLG IRUWKHSHUPLWIHH$VVXFKWKH&LW\KDVWRUHLPEXUVHWKHFRQWUDFWRUIRUWKH H[WUDIHHVSDLG
2ULJLQDO&RQWUDFW$PRXQW
3UHYLRXV&KDQJH2UGHU
V
&RQWUDFW$PRXQW3ULRUWRWKLV&KDQJH2UGHU
$PRXQWRIWKLV&KDQJH2UGHU
1HZ&RQWUDFW$PRXQW,QFOXGLQJWKLV&KDQJH2UGHU
&RQWUDFW7LPHZLOOEHLQFUHDVHGE\ZRUNLQJGD\V
5HYLHZHGE\
& R Q V W U X F W L R Q 0 D Q D J H U
' D W H
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
),1$/&+$1*(25'(5
&LW\RI6DOLQDV
5HY 3DJHRI
7KLV&KDQJH2UGHULVKHUHE\DJUHHGWRDFFHSWHGDQGDSSURYHGE\
&RQWUDFWRU
'DWH
3URMHFW0DQDJHU
'DWH
IRU
&\ULO&KDUOHV3URMHFW0DQDJHU
&LW\
'DWH
/XLV2FKRD6U&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW$QDO\VW
+$&RQVWUXFWLRQ±'XUDLG0RKDPPHG
&OLIIZRRG'U/D0HVD
&D
3KRQH
(0
+$HIIRUWV#JPDLOFRP
Date:
City:
Lisa Brinton, Director (Or Designee)
Date:Adriana Robles, City Engineer
City:
HA CONSTRUCTION QUALITY & RELEIBILITY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa, CA 91941, USA Phone: 916-237-6803 Email: [email protected]
Project: City of Salinas Change Order 03 Contract No.: 20031 Date: 12/18/2023 From: HA Construction
To: Gelareh Jokar
Subject: Permit fees
According to the city schedule of value, the permit fees is (43 33.45), but the actual fee was paid is ($4,506.45), So the overpaid difference is ($173.00). We would ask, please, to reimburse us the difference mentioned ($173.00) as it is an extra amount that was specified before.
Please see below bank transaction.
Duraid Mohammed
dba
HA Construction
Total
for
This
Period
Total
Yeara -to-Date
Totat l
Overrdrd afa t
Feess
00.000
0.0000
HA CONSTRUCTION
10111 CLIFFWOOD DR
LA MESA CA 91941
Member Number: 100194010
Statement Period:0 9 /01/23 to 09/30/23
Page: 1 of 5
BUSINESS VALUE CHECKING continued
Fees & Withdrawals
Post Date Amount Descri ption
09-24 -81.43 Point Of Sale Withdrawal NNT HARBOR FREIGHT 001741 2631
NORTHGATE BLVD SACRAMENTO
09-24 -5.32 Point Of Sale Withdrawal A UTOZONE 4007 3000
NORSACRAMENTO CAUS
09-25 -82.26 Point Of Sale Withdrawal COSTCO GAS #0765 FOLSOM CAUS
09-25 -25.20 Point Of Sale Withdrawal NNT OUTDOOR SUPPLY 002117 3980
BEL AIRE PLAZA NAPA
09-25 -9.78 Point Of Sale Withdrawal Amazon.com*T11LQ0C81 Amzn com/billWAUS
Amzn.com/billWAUS
09-25
-8,355.25
External
Withdrawal
NEWREZ-SHELLPOIN
20230924002784
-
WEB
PMTS
09-26
-76.15
Point
Of
Sale
Withdrawal
COSTCO
GAS
#0765
FOLSOM
CAUS
09-26
-28.00
Point
Of
Sale
Withdrawal
AMZN
Mktp
US*T11IN0M30
Amzn.com/billWAUS
09-26
-8,355.25
External
Withdrawal
NEWREZ-SHELLPOIN
20230924002784
-
WEB
PMTS
09-26
-16.54
Point
Of
Sale
Withdrawal
IN-N-OUT
FOLSOM
FOLSOM
CAUS
09-26
-1,138.30
External
Withdrawal
WEB
-
TOYOTA
ACH
RTL
09252023
-
09252023
P35418712-26269
09-26
-250.00
External
Withdrawal
CITI
CARD
ONLINE
-
PAYMENT
09-26
-500.00
External
Withdrawal
CITI
CARD
ONLINE
-
PAYMENT
09-26
-300.00
External
Withdrawal
Synchrony
Bank
-
CC
PYMT
09-27
-742.31
Point
Of
Sale
Withdrawal
IN
*STRAUGHN
COMMUNICAT707-9757852
CAUS
09-27
-500.00
Point
Of
Sale
Withdrawal
WWW
COSTCO
COM
800-955-2292
WAUS
0909-2-27
-11,9,918.6677
Exxternall
Withhdrdrawawala
UNUNITI EDWHW OLLESALA EE
0000000000000000000 000000 00000000
-
1 TITIMEME
DFDFTT
09-28
-115.64
Point
Of
Sale
Withdrd awal
COSTCO
GASS
#0765
FOLSOM
CAUS
09-28
-18.10
Point
Of
Sale
Withdrawal
IN-N-OUT
FOLSOM
FOLSOM
CAUS
09-28
-1.99
Point
Of
Sale
Withdrawal
GOOGLE
*Google
Storage
855-836-3987
CAUS
09-29
-346.97
Poinnt
Of
Sale
Withdrawal
SOUTHWES
525262622008484838 5880000-4-43535-97922
TXTXT USUS
0909-2-299
-3-3.8.899
PoPoinintt
OfOf
SaSalele
WiWiththdrdrawawal
24243030
SMSMFF
SASACTCTOWOWNN
SHSHOPOP
SAACRAMENTO
CACACAUSUU
0909-30
-4,5,5066.4455
PoP int
OfO
SaS lel
WiW thdrd awawalal
CICITY
OFOF
SAALIL NANASS
11 838 1--75758-8-79793232
CACAUSUS
0909-3-300
-1-1,5,50000.0.000
PoPoinintt
OfOf
SaSalele
WiWiththdrdrawawalal
SQSQ
*B*BAJAJAYAYASAS
AUAUTOTOMIMITITIVEVE
SQSQUAUARERE
PURCRCHASES
SASACRAMMENTO
C
09-30
-771.4545
Point
Of
Sale
WiW thdrawal
Hot
DeDeals
4 YoY u
EL
CAJON
CAUS
09-30
-43.30
Pointt
Of
Saleee
Withdrawal
Hot
Deals
4 You
EL
CAJON
CAUS
Member Number: 100194010
Statement Period:0 9 /01/23 to 09/30/23
Page: 5 of 5
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 02-R1
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
Date: 01/25/2024 (revised 02/06/2024)
Project: Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Proj ect Change Order #: 02
Owner: CITY OF SALINAS
Contractor: HA Construction
TYPE OF CHANGE ORDER (Check one:)
Errors and Omissions
Unforeseen Site Condition
Owner Authorization
Emergency
Description of Change:
The following Proposed Change Order(s) are incorporated into the Contract by reference:
Ref. # Summary Description:
Amount:
1 Contractor encountered rotted plywood and framing members on the roof, and the City directed the contractor to replace the rotted frami ng members, fumigate the building for termites’ removal, and apply insecticides to the existing to remain framing members.
The contractor submitted COR No.1 requesting reimbu rsement for the fumigation and application of insecticides to the existing framing members. (Per 2/6 Weekly Constr.
Meeting, framing materials is not included in this COR and shall be included as a separate COR. This COR has been modified per that directive. )
$29,717.27
Original Contract Amount: $151,000.00
Previous Change Order(s): $173.00
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order: $151,173.00 Amount of this Change Order: $29,717.27
New Contract Amount Including this Change Order: $180,890.27
Contract Time will be increased by 0 working days.
Reviewed by: GJ
Contractor agrees to perform the above-described wo rk in accordance with the above terms and in compliance with applicable sections of the Project documents. The adjustment in the contra ct sum, if any, and the adjustment in the contract time, if any, set out in this Change Order shall constitute the entire compensation and/ or adjustment in the contract time due Contractor arising out of the change in the work covered by this Change Order, unless otherwise prov ided in this Change Order. No additions or deletions to this Change Order shall be allowed, except with written permission of the City. Contractor accepts the terms and conditions stated above as full and final settlement of any and all claims arising from this Change Order.
DocuSign Envelope ID: CD921A1A-41B4-4028-B182-7A7C7F377C6A
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 02-R1
12/2
1/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
This
Change Order is hereby agreed to, accepted and approved by:
Contractor: Date:
Project Manager/Construction Manager: Date: 02/06/2024
(for) Cyril Charles, Project Manager
Cit
y: Date:
Luis Ochoa, Sr. Community Development Analyst
Cit
y: Date:
Adriana Robles, City Engineer
City: Date:
Lisa Brinton, Director (Or Designee)
HA Construction – Duraid Mohammed
101
11 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa
Ca 91941
Phone: 916.237.6803
EM: [email protected]
02/06/2024
City Date
Jim Pia, Interim City Manager (Or Designee)
DocuSign Envelope ID: CD921A1A-41B4-4028-B182-7A7C7F377C6A 2/8/2024 | 12:07 PM PST
2/13/2024 | 10:28 AM PST
2/14/2024 | 5:07 PM PST
2/14/2024 | 5:18 PM PST
HA CONSTRUCTION QUALITY & RELEIBILITY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa, CA 91941, USA Phone: 916-237-6803 Email: [email protected]
Project: City of Salinas Change Order 04 Contract No.: 20031 Date: 01/22/2024 From: HA Construction
To: Gelareh Jokar
Subject: Roof Defected Members Cost Proposal
Below is the cost proposal for treatment of the building and the demo the roof sheathing, fascia, and the defected wooden blocks and the rafters for the Natividad Creek Park restroom. The cost includes labor and materials in addition to the expenses mentioned in the table below.
Item preparation
Discription Unit $/Unit Quantity Total
Building Treatment
A Fumigation
Laborer 1 prepar and cover the building hr 75 24 1,800.00$ Injecting the fumigation gass hr 110 8 880
0 0
removing the building cover hr 75 12 900
B Tim-Bor professional insecticide
2 Treating the wood sructure hr 120 16 1,920.00$
5,500.00$
Materials
Fumigatuion gas 325.00$
tim-bor professional insecticide 185.00$
510.00$
Tax 8% 40.80$
550.80$
Sub Total 6,050.80$
Admin 7% Profit 8% Tax 7.5% Total L+ M+OC
0.07 0.08 7.5%
385.00$ 470.80$ 35.31$ 7,457.40$ Re Roofing Works
Laborer
D Demo
1 Takig down the OSB Sheething hr 66.81 24 1,603.44$
2 Taking down the facia hr 66.81 10 668.10$
3 Demo the defected blocks and rafters hr 66.81 24 1,603.44$ 4 Cleaning the site Hr 66.81 8 534.48 $
E Construction
1 Preparing the rafters for new sheathing hr 88.43 8 707.44 $ 2 Installing the rafters and the blocks hr 88.43 60 5,305.80$ 3 Installing the fascia hr 88.43 16 1,414.88$
4 Installing the OSB sheathing hr 88.43 72 6,366.96$
18,204.54$
Materials
2x4x 16 lumber no 8 15 120.00$
2x6x 16 lumber no 15 15 225.00$
2x8x 16 Lumber no 10 17 170.00$
4x8 OSB Sheathing Groved no 55 35 1,925.00$
nails/screws Ib 10 15 150.00$
2,590.00$
Tax 8% 207.20$
2,797.20$
Admin %15 Profit Tax %7.5 Total L + M + OC
0.15 0.23 7.5%
2,730.68 $ 4,815.10 $ 361.13 $ 28,547.52$ 36,004.92$
Other Cost OC
Other Cost OC
Total for the Ttreatment and ReRoofing
Duraid Mohammed
01/25/2024
D.M.
(1200 sf)
(140 lf)
(same hrs as demo of entire roof rafters?)
(14)
$935.34
(1200 sf)
(almost same hrs as demo of
entire roof rafters and blocks?
less than 10% were replaced)
(24)
(8)
(16)
(72)
(140 lf)
$2122.32
$14352.96
ok
$25,057.07
$32,514.47
ok
Signature:
Date:
Reviewed and costs was negotiated with the contractor.
(CSG/01.25.2024)
Request 1-R2
Per 2/6 Weekly Constr. Meeting:
This work is not included in this
COR and shall be included as
a separate COR. This COR has
been modified per that
directive.
$22,259.87
$29,717.27
DocuSign Envelope ID: CD921A1A-41B4-4028-B182-7A7C7F377C6A
WOOD DESTROYING PESTS AND ORGANISMS INSPECTION REPORT
1395 Nogal Drive, Salinas , CA 93905 12/15/2023 6
W8293
PR 9119
HA Construction
Duraid Mohammed
HA Construction
Duraid Mohammed
HA Construction
Duraid Mohammed
Single story, bathroom facility, block construction, slab.
Utility Closet
None
Luis E Olivas OPR14237
An inspection has been made of the structure(s) shown on the diagram in accordance with the Structural Pest Control Act. Detached porches, detached steps, detached decks and any other structures not on the diagram were not inspected.
Subterranean Termites Drywood Termites Fungus / Dryrot Other Findings Further Inspection If any of the above boxes are checked, it indicates that there were visible problems in accessible areas. Read the report for the details on checked items.
Other Tags Posted:
InspectionTag Posted:
Ordered by: Property Owner and/or Party of Interest: Report Sent to:
Escrow #
Report #
Lic. Registration #
Number of PagesDate of InspectionBuildingAddress:
COMPLETE REPORT LIMITED REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT REINSPECTION REPORT Questions or problems concerning the above report should be directed to the manager of the company. Unresolved questions or problems with the services performed may be directed to the Structural Pest Control Board at (916) 561-8708, (800) 737-8188 or www. pestboard.ca.gov You are entitled to obtain copies of all reports and completion notices on this property reported to the Structural Pest Control Board during the preceeding two years.
To obtain copies contact: Structural Pest Control Board, 2005 Evergreen Street, Ste. 1500, Sacramento, California 95815.
NOTE:
This Diagram is not to scale
General Description:
Inspected by: State License No. Signature
DocuSign Envelope ID: CD921A1A-41B4-4028-B182-7A7C7F377C6A SECOND PAGE OF STANDARD INSPECTION REPORT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT:
Address
Date Report #
1395 Nogal Drive, Salinas , CA 93905 12/15/2023 W8293
What Is a Wood Destroying Pest and Organism Inspection Report? The following explains the scope and limitations of a structural pest control inspection and a Wood Destroying Pest & Organism Inspection Report.
A Wood Destroying Pest & Organism Inspection Report contains findings as to the presence or absence of wood destroying insects or organisms in visible and accessible areas on the date of inspection and contains our recommendations for correcting any infestations, infections, or conditions found. The contents of the wood destroying pest & organism inspection report are governed by the structural pest control act and its rules and regulations.
Some structures may not comply with building code requirements or may have structural, plumbing, electrical, heating and air conditioning, or other defects that do not pertain to this report. This report does not address any such defects as they are not within the scope of the license of the inspector or the company issuing this report.
The following areas are considered inaccessible for purposes of inspection or are not included in a normal inspection report and therefore are excluded in this report: the interior of hollow walls; spaces between an upstairs floor and the ceiling below or a porch deck and soffit below; stall showers over finished ceilings; such structural segments as areas enclosed by bay windows, buttresses, built-in cabinet work, areas under floor covering; any areas requiring the removal of storage, furnishings or appliances; and any areas to which there is no access without defacing or removing lumber, masonry or finished workmanship.
Certain areas are recognized by the industry as inaccessible and/or for other reasons not inspected. These areas include, but are not limited to:
inaccessible and/or insulated attics or portions thereof, attics with less than an 18" clear crawl space, the interior of hollow walls, spaces between a floor or porch deck and the ceiling below, areas where there is no access without defacing or tearing out lumber, masonry or finished work that make inspection impractical, and areas or timbers around eaves that would require use of an extension ladder.
Certain areas may be inaccessible for inspection due to construction or storage. We recommend further inspection of areas where inspection was impractical. Re: Structural Pest Control Act, Business and Professions Code Article 1, 8516(b)(9). Stall shower, if any, is water tested in compliance with Title 16 Professional and Vocational Regulations Article 5, §1991.1(12) of the Structural Pest Control Act. The absence or presence of leaks through sub-floor, adjacent floors or walls will be reported. This is a report of the condition of the stall shower at the time of inspection only, and should not be confused as a guarantee. Although we make a visual examination, we do not deface or probe into window or door frames, decorative trim, roof members, etc., in search of wood destroying pests or organisms. "This company will reinspect repairs done by others within four months of the original inspection. A charge, if any, can be no greater than the original inspection fee for each reinspection. The reinspection must be done within ten (10) working days of request. The reinspection is a visual inspection and if inspection of concealed areas is desired, inspection of work in progress will be necessary. Any guarantees must be received from parties performing repairs."
NOTE: We do not inspect or certify plumbing, plumbing fixtures, etc.
NOTE: "The exterior surface of the roof was not inspected. If you want the water tightness of the roof determined, you should contact a roofing contractor who is licensed by the Contractors' State License Board." "NOTICE: The charge for service that this company subcontracts to another registered company may include the company's charges for arranging and administering such services that are in addition to the direct costs associated with paying the subcontractor. You may accept 101 Exterminators Inc.'s bid or you may contract directly with another registered company licensed to perform the work.
If you choose to contract directly with another registered company, 101 Exterminators Inc. will not in any way be responsible for any act or omission in the performance of work that you directly contract with another to perform." "NOTICE: Reports on this structure prepared by various registered companies should list the same findings (i.e. termite infestations, termite damage, fungus damage, etc.). However, recommendations to correct these findings may vary from company to company. You have a right to seek a second opinion from another company." This Wood Destroying Pest & Organisms Report DOES NOT INCLUDE MOLD or any mold like conditions. No reference will be made to mold or mold-like conditions. Mold is not a Wood Destroying Organism and is outside the scope of this report as defined by the Structural Pest Control Act.
If you wish your property to be inspected for mold or mold-like conditions, please contact the appropriate mold professional. "Local treatment is not intended to be an entire structure treatment method. If infestations of wood-destroying pests extend or exist beyond the area(s) of local treatment, they may not be exterminated." DocuSign Envelope ID: CD921A1A-41B4-4028-B182-7A7C7F377C6A THIRD PAGE OF STANDARD INSPECTION REPORT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT:
Address
Date Report #
1395 Nogal Drive, Salinas , CA 93905 12/15/2023 W8293
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
NOTE: This is a limited inspection report requested by the owner, limited to the inspection of the restoom ceiling only.
Note:
It is recommended that further inspection of the entire structure be made in accordance with Structural Pest
Control regulations.
Drywood:
2A PRICE:
$3,600.00
FIN
DINGS: Evidence of drywood termite infestation at roof framing as indicated on the diagram.
RECO
MMENDATION: Vacate the premises and seal the structure for fumigation with Vikane or Zythor.
Rem
ove or cover accessible evidence of infestation. Fumigation warranteed for two years. Fumigation awa
reness notice must be signed prior to fumigation. See fumigation notice for terms and liabilities.
Other Findings:
4A PRICE:
$2,450.00
FIN
DINGS: Preventative treatment to roof framing.
RECO
MMENDATION: As a preventative treat roof framing with Tim-Bor Professional. To help minimize future act
ivity of termites, beetles and fungus to roof framing.
DocuSign Envelope ID: CD921A1A-41B4-4028-B182-7A7C7F377C6A FOURTH PAGE OF STANDARD INSPECTION REPORT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT:
Address
Date Report #
1395 Nogal Drive, Salinas , CA 93905 12/15/2023 W8293
In accordance with the laws and regulations of the State of California, we are required to provide you with the following information prior to application of pesticides to your property.
"State law requires that you be given the following information: CAUTION--PESTICIDES ARE TOXIC CHEMICALS. Structural Pest Control Companies are registered and regulated by the Structural Pest Control Board, and apply pesticides which are registered and approved for use by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Registration is granted when the state finds that, based on existing scientific evidence, there are no appreciable risks if proper use conditions are followed or that the risks are outweighed by the benefits. The degree of risk depends upon the degree of exposure, so exposure should be minimized." "If within 24 hours following application you experience symptoms similar to common seasonal illness comparable to the flu, contact your physician or poison control center (800) 222-1222 and your pest control company immediately." For further information, contact any of the following:
101 Exterminators Inc. (831)-500-1613
Poison Control Center (800) 222-1222
(Health Questions) County Health Dept.
Monterey County (831) 755-4500
Santa Cruz County (831) 454-2022
San Benito County (831 637-5367
Santa Clara County (408) 918-3400
San Joaquin County (209) 468-3420
Alemeda County (510) 267-8000 Merced County (209) 381-1200 San Francisco County (415) 252-3800 Contra Costa County (925) 692-2500 San Luis Obispo County (805) 434-5950 (Application Info.) County Agriculture Commission
Monterey County (831)759-7325
Santa Cruz County (831)763-8080 San Benito County (831) 637-5344
Santa Clara County (408) 918-4600
San Joaquin County (209) 953-6000
Alameda County (510) 670-5232 Merced County (209) 385-7431 San Francisco County (415) 252-3862 Contra Costa County (925) 608-6600 San Luis Obispo County (805) 237-3050 Structural Pest Control Board (Regulatory Info.) (916) 561-8704 2005 Evergreen Street, Ste. 1500 Sacramento, CA 95815
TERMITE AND FUNGUS CONTROL CHEMICALS
Vikane (EPA Reg. No. 1015-78-AA)
Active Ingredients: Sulfuryl Floride 99.8%
Zythor (EPA Reg. No. 81824-1-AA)
Active Ingredients: Sulfuryl Fluoride 99.3%
NOTICE TO OWNER
Under the California Mechanics Lien Law any structural pest control company which contracts to do work for you, any contractor, subcontractor, laborer, supplier or other person who helps to improve your property, but is not paid for his or her work or supplies, has a right to enforce a claim against your property. This means that after a court hearing, your property could be sold by a court officer and the proceeds of the sale used to satisfy the indebtedness. This can happen even if you have paid your structural pest control company in full if the subcontractor, laborers or suppliers remain unpaid.
To preserve their right to file a claim or lien against your property, certain claimants such as subcontractors or material suppliers are required to provide you with a document entitled "Preliminary Notice." Prime contractors and laborers for wages do not have to provide this notice. A Preliminary Notice is not a lien against your property. Its purpose is to notify you of persons who may have a right to file a lien against your property if they are not paid.
DocuSign Envelope ID: CD921A1A-41B4-4028-B182-7A7C7F377C6A FIFTH PAGE OF STANDARD INSPECTION REPORT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT:
Address
Date Report #
1395 Nogal Drive, Salinas , CA 93905 12/15/2023 W8293
NOTE: If the Home Owner fails to pay billing in full, 101 Exterminators Inc. will have the right to be paid back for all of its costs and expenses to the extent not prohibited by applicable law. Those expenses include, for example (but not limited to), reasonable attorney's fees. If for any reason this account is to be turned over to our collection agency, you will be responsible for all costs of collecting.
DocuSign Envelope ID: CD921A1A-41B4-4028-B182-7A7C7F377C6A SIXTH PAGE OF STANDARD INSPECTION REPORT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT:
Address
Date
Report #
1395 Nogal Drive, Salinas , CA 93905
12/15/2023
W8293
2A
$3,600.00
4A
$2,450.00
Complete all of the items quoted above with
Primary Estimate.
With close of Escrow
$____________Deposit
$____________on Completion
I have read and understand the terms of the Report referenced above and agree to the terms and conditions set forth. 101 Exterminators Inc. is hereby authorized to complete the Items selected above and it is agreed that payment shall be made as follows:
Approval
Item
Primary Estimate
Section
Payment shall be made as follows:
Escrow Number:____________ Escrow Company:________________________ Escrow Officer: ____________________ Phone ( ) ______ - _________ Email: _____________________ Address: ___________________________________ Owner or Authorized Representative:
Owner
Representative's Title:______________________________
Print Name:__________________________________ X__________________________________ Date______________ Owner or Authorized Representative:
Owner
Representative's Title:______________________________
Print Name:__________________________________ X__________________________________ Date______________ Complete only the above Items checked.
Total $____________
Total Estimate
$6050.00
Findings and Recommendations estimated by this Company:
DocuSign Envelope ID: CD921A1A-41B4-4028-B182-7A7C7F377C6A
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 03
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
Date: 01/26/2024
Project: Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project Change Order #: 03
Owner: CITY OF SALINAS
Contractor: HA Construction
TYPE OF CHANGE ORDER (Check one:) Errors and Omissions Unforeseen Site Condition
Owner Authorization
Emergency
Description of Change:
The following Proposed Change Order(s) are incorporated into the Contract by reference:
Ref. # Summary Description:
Amount:
1 Contractor submitted a COR to replace the existing sewer pipes with new piping in the plumbing chase. This request was not approved by the City. The Contractor was then directed to conduct a camera inspection of the existing piping to identify any required cleaning, and to snake out any debris clogging the existing to remain piping. The Contractor submitted COR # 2-R1 for this work.
$1,263.62
Original Contract Amount: $151,000.00
Previous Change Order(s): $32,687.47
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order: $183,687.47 Amount of this Change Order: $1,263.62
New Contract Amount Including this Change Order: $184,951.09
Contract Time will be increased by 0 working days.
Reviewed by: GJ
Contractor agrees to perform the above-described work in accordance with the above terms and in compliance with applicable sections of the Project documents. The adjustment in the contract sum, if any, and the adjustment in the contract time, if any, set out in this Change Order shall constitute the entire compensation and/or adjustment in the contract time due C ontractor arising out of the change in the work covered by this Change Order, unless otherwise provided in this Change Order. No additions or deletions to this Change Order shall be allowed, except with written permission of the City. Contractor accepts the terms and conditions stated above as full and final settlement of any and all claims arising from this Change Order.
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 03
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
This Change Order is hereby agreed to, accepted and approved by:
Contractor: Date:
Project Manager/Construction Manager: Date:
(for) Cyril Charles, Project Manager
City: Date:
Luis Ochoa, Sr. Community Development Analyst
City: Date:
Adriana Robles, City Engineer
City: Date:
Lisa Brinton, Director (Or Designee)
HA Construction – Duraid Mohammed
10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa
Ca 91941
Phone: 916.237.6803
EM: [email protected]
Duraid Mohammed dba HA Construction
026/2024
01/26/2024
HA CONSTRUCTION QUALITY & RELEIBILITY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa, CA 91941, USA Phone: 916-237-6803 Email: [email protected]
Project: City of Salinas Change Order 04 Contract No.: 20031 Date: 01/22/2024 From: HA Construction
To: Gelareh Jokar
Subject: Men’s Urinal Drain camera and Cleaning
Below is the cost proposal Men’s Urinal Drain camera and Cleaning. The cost includes labor and materials in addition to the expenses mentioned in the table below.
Duraid Mohammed
dba
HA Construction
Item preparation
Discription Unit $/Unit Quantity Total
A Demo
1 Clean up the Mens' Urnal pipes hr 66.81 8 534.48$
B Construction
2 Camera ditector for the drain pipeshr 66.81 4 267.24$ 801.72$
Materials
1 Cleaner Machine hr 15 8 120.00$
Tax 8% 9.60$
129.60$
Admin %15 Profit Tax %7.5 Total L+ M
0.15 0.23 7.5%
120.26$ 212.05$ 15.90$ 1,263.63$
#2-R1
ok
ok
ok
ok
Reviewed and costs are acceptable
(CSG/01.24.2024)
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 03
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
Date: 01/25/2024
Project: Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project Change Order #: 04
Owner: CITY OF SALINAS
Contractor: HA Construction
TYPE OF CHANGE ORDER (Check one:) Errors and Omissions Unforeseen Site Condition
Owner Authorization
Emergency
Description of Change:
The following Proposed Change Order(s) are incorporated into the Contract by reference:
Ref. # Summary Description:
Amount:
1 The architectural drawings did not specify the removal and replacement of the four non- ADA restroom partitions within the Women's restroom. During demolition work, the Contractor submitted RFI #7 seeking clarification on whether the demolition and replacement of the four partitions was required. In response, the City directed the contractor to remove and replace the four non-ADA restroom partitions. The Contractor submitted COR #4, seeking reimbursement for this scope of work. $16,348.80
Original Contract Amount: $151,000.00
Previous Change Order(s): $33,951.09
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order: $184,951.09 Amount of this Change Order: $16,348.80
New Contract Amount Including this Change Order: $201,299.89
Contract Time will be increased by 0 working days.
Reviewed by: GJ
Contractor agrees to perform the above-described work in accordance with the above terms and in compliance with applicable sections of the Project documents. The adjustment in the contract sum, if any, and the adjustment in the contract time, if any, set out in this Change Order shall constitute the entire compensation and/or adjustment in the contract time due C ontractor arising out of the change in the work covered by this Change Order, unless otherwise provided in this Change Order. No additions or deletions to this Change Order shall be allowed, except with written permission of the City. Contractor accepts the terms and conditions stated above as full and final settlement of any and all claims arising from this Change Order.
04 FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 03
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
This Change Order is hereby agreed to, accepted and approved by:
Contractor: Date:
Project Manager/Construction Manager: Date:
(for) Cyril Charles, Project Manager
City: Date:
Luis Ochoa, Sr. Community Development Analyst
City: Date:
Adriana Robles, City Engineer
City: Date:
Lisa Brinton, Director (Or Designee)
HA Construction – Duraid Mohammed
10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa
Ca 91941
Phone: 916.237.6803
EM: [email protected]
Duraid Mohammed dba HA Construction
01/26/2024
04 01/26/2024
HA CONSTRUCTION QUALITY & RELEIBILITY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa, CA 91941, USA Phone: 916-237-6803 Email: [email protected]
Project: City of Salinas Change Order 05 Contract No.: 20031 Date: 01/23/2023 From: HA Construction
To: Gelareh Jokar
Subject: Women Restroom’s Partitions
Below is the cost proposal for supplying and installing women’s restrooms Partitions. The cost includes labor and materials in addition to the expenses mentioned in the table below.
Duraid Mohammed
dba
HA Construction
Item preparation
Discription Unit $/Unit Quantity Total
A Demo
1 Remove old partitions hr 66.81 16 1,068.96$
B Construction
2 layout the plan hr 66.81 8 534.48$
3 Installing the partions hr 66.81 85 5,678.85$
7,282.29$
Materials Partitions and stalls, and all the accessories 5,600.00$ 5,600.00$
Tax 8% 448.00$
6,048.00$
Admin %15 Profit Tax %7.5 Total L+ M
0.15 0.23 7.5%
1,092.34$ 1,926.17$ 144.46$ 16,348.80$
Request 4-R2
Reviewed and costs was negotiated with the contractor.
(CSG/01.25.2024)
T
o
i
l
e
t
p
a
r
t
i
t
i
o
n
s.
co
m
D
B
A
F
r
y
S
p
e
ci
a
l
t
y
I
n
c.
P
h
:
1 -
8 3
3 -
7 5
9 -
0 1
7 6
P
a
g
e
1 o
f
1 E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
E
S
T
I
M
A
T
E
110258
HA Constr
uction
D
A
T
E
0 1
/24
/
2 0
2 4
S
A
L
E
S
R
E
P
J
O
B
N
A
M
E
R
O
B
6 1
9 -
9 5
4 -
5 7
3 4
Nati
vidad Park Reastroom Project
A
C
T
I
V
I
T
Y
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
Q
T
Y
A
M
O
U
N
T
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
T
Y
P
E
B
O
B
R
I
C
K
1 0
9 2
S
E
R
I
E
S
S
T
Y
L
E
F
L
O
O
R
M
O
U
N
T
E
D
/
O
V
E
R
H
E
A
D
B
R
A
C
E
D
H
A
R
D
W
A
R
E
F
U
L
L
H
E
I
G
H
T
C
O
L
O
R
F
O
R
R
E
S
T
G
R
E
E
N
S
T
A
L
L
S
I
N
C
L
U
D
E
D
I
N
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
4 5
,
600
.
0 0
D
E
L
I
V
E
R
E
D
A
P
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E
L
Y
:
1 0
-
1 5
B
I
Z
D
A
Y
S
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
(
1 )
S
I
N
G
L
E
S
H
I
P
M
E
N
T
T
O
:
9 2
8 6
8 F
R
E
I
G
H
T
I
N
C
L
U
D
E
D
*
*
*
Q
U
O
T
E
S
A
R
E
V
A
L
I
D
F
O
R
3 0
C
A
L
E
N
D
A
R
D
A
Y
S
.
*
*
*
S
A
L
E
S
T
A
X
W
I
L
L
B
E
A
D
D
E
D
I
F
S
H
I
P
P
I
N
G
T
O
C
A
,
T
N
,
T
X
,
O
K
,
N
Y
,
F
L
,
G
A
,
M
A
,
N
J
,
W
A
,
A
Z
,
M
D
,
M
I
,
M
N
,
N
C
,
A
N
D
V
A
.
●
Q
U
A
N
T
I
T
I
E
S
&
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
N
O
T
G
U
A
R
A
N
T
E
E
D
T
O
A
G
R
E
E
W
I
T
H
P
L
A
N
S
A
N
D
/
O
R
S
P
E
C
S
.
I
T
I
S
Y
O
U
R
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
T
O
R
E
V
I
E
W
E
N
T
I
R
E
Q
U
O
T
E
/
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
P
R
I
O
R
T
O
B
I
D
D
I
N
G
Y
O
U
R
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
.
Y
O
U
A
R
E
A
L
S
O
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
L
E
F
O
R
V
E
R
I
F
Y
I
N
G
L
O
C
A
L
M
U
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
I
T
Y
/
C
O
D
E
C
O
M
P
L
I
A
N
C
E
.
A
N
Y
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
M
A
D
E
C
A
N
I
M
P
A
C
T
P
R
I
C
I
N
G
.
T
O
T
A
L
A
c
c
e
p
t
e
d
B
y
A
c
c
e
p
t
e
d
D
a
t
e
$5,600.00
10111 Cliffwoos Dr
LA
Mesa, CA 91941
PERFORMANCE SPOTLIGHT
SCRC: Hard to Scratch. Easy to Clean.
The proof is in the testing. SCRC offers the performance you need for high traffic and vandal-prone restrooms. 5 out of 6 marks removed Zero scratches under 6 kg of weight The ASTM D 6578 graffiti resistance test consists
of preparing material samples with marks from
six staining agents. After 24 hours, the marks are
cleaned until they are removed.
Five out of six marks were removed from SCRC.
In the ASTM D 2197 scratch resistance test procedure,
weights up to 10 kg (22 lbs) are added to a scraper
and a material sample is dragged beneath the scraper.
When a scratch occurs, the weight is recorded.
SCRC did not scratch with 6 kilograms of weight.
SCRC minor edge nicks and random color variations are normal consequences of manufacturing material containing natural fibers. Material can vary in color between thicknesses and production batches.
Trespa is a registered trademark of Trespa International BV. (SCRC) Golden Khaki Desert Beige
SCO1 SC02
Terra Cotta Forest Green
SC03 SC04
SOLID COLOR REINFORCED COMPOSITE (SCRC)
STANDARD COLORS & PATTERNS
The illustrations and descriptions herein are applicable to production as of the date of this Technical Data Sheet. 1090 Revised 7/19/23 The manufacturer reserves the right to, and does from time to time, make changes and improvements in designs and dimensions. © 2023 by Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc Technical Data
1090
SERIES
SierraSeries®
Solid Color Reinforced Composite
Partition and Screens
Robe Hook
Y-Bracket (Stile or Panel to Wall)
Outswing Door
Through-Bolt
Barrel HingeLatch
F-Bracket (Panel to Wall)
Outswing Keeper
Inswing Door
Divider Panel
U-Bracket (Panel to Stile)
Stile
Door Pull
Inswing Keeper
SPECIFICATION
Height: 58" (1473mm) Doors and Panels with 12" (305mm) Floor Clearance
MATERIAL
Stiles* — 3/4" (19mm) thick, SCRC with Gra ffitiOff ™ surface thermoset and integrally fused into one homogenous piece. Surface, edge, core are to be the same color. *Stiles for 1096 Series floor-to-ceiling anchored units have a leveling device at each end.
Standard Size Stiles:
• For compartments — 3", 4", 5", 6", 7", 8", 10", 12", 16", 18", 20", or 24" (76, 102, 127, 152, 179, 203, 254, 305, 406, 457, 508, 610mm) wide. • For screens — 6" (152mm) wide.
• Floor-anchored — 69" (1753mm) high.
• Overhead-braced — 83" (2108mm) high.
• Floor-to-ceiling anchored — Up to 120" (3048mm) ceiling height. • Ceiling-hung — 83" (2108mm) high for 96" (2438mm) ceilings or as required up to 120" (3048mm) ceilings.
Panels — 1/2" (13mm) thick, SCRC with Gra ffitiOff ™ surface thermoset and integrally fused into one homogeneous piece. Surface, edge, core are to be the same color.
Standard Size Panels:
• For compartments — Up to 84" (2134mm) wide; 58" (1473mm) high.
Urinal Screens — 1/2" (13mm) thick, SCRC with GraffitiOff ™ surface thermoset and integrally fused into one homogeneous piece. Surface, edge, core are to be the same color.
Standard Size Urinal Screens:
• For wall-hung screens — Up to 24" (610mm) wide; 42" to 54" (1067 to 1372mm) high.
• For ceiling-hung, floor anchored and post-to-ceiling screens — Up to 60" (1524mm) wide; 58" (1473mm) high.
Doors — 3/4 " ( 1 9 m m ) t h i c k , S C R C w i t h G raffitiOff surface thermoset and integrally fused into one homogeneous piece. Surface, edge, core are to be the same color.
Standard Size Doors:
• Inswing and outswing doors are standard 22" to 37" (559 to 940mm) wide; 58" (1473mm) high.
Edges SCRC is a natural material comprised of wood chips, dyes and resins with a melamine surface. Edges lack a melamine surface and may discolor in environments with significant UV lighting. Discoloration of edges, should it occur, is not covered under warranty.
Posts (for 1093 Series screens only) — 1 1/4" (32mm) square tubing; 18-8, Type-304, 18-gauge (1.2mm) stainless steel with satin finish. Floor and ceiling connections are constructed of 18-8, Type-304, heavy-gauge stainless steel.
Furnished in 120" (3048mm) lengths; to be cut in field to job specifications.
Standard Size Post:
• For 1093 Series post-to-ceiling screens only. 1 1/4" (32mm) square. 120" (3048mm); cut to required height in field.
Headrail (for 1092 Series compartments only) — Extruded anodized aluminum.
Enclosed construction with sloping top. Face has raised grip-resistant edge.
Designer’s Notes:
• Headrails with integral curtain tracks and hooks are available for compartments without doors. Optional vinyl curtains are available.
Wall Posts — 1" by 1 1/2" (25 by 38mm) wide tubing; 18-8, Type-304, 16-gauge (1.6mm) stainless steel with satin-finish. 58" (1473mm) high, pre-drilled for door hardware.
TOP VIEW OF 1092 (BARREL HINGE AND STANDARD BRACKET) INSTALLATION.
The illustrations and descriptions herein are applicable to production as of the date of this Technical Data Sheet. 1090 Revised 7/19/23 The manufacturer reserves the right to, and does from time to time, make changes and improvements in designs and dimensions. © 2023 by Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc Concrete Floor
Leveling Bar
Bolt
Hex Nut
Lock Washer
Flat Washer
Hex Nut
Flat Shoe Retainer
Flat Washer
Wedge Anchor
3/4"
(19mm)
3 3/4"
(95mm)
4 1/4"
(19mm)
1 1/4"
(32mm)3/4"
(19mm)
Door Bumper
1 1/2"
(38mm)
1"
(25mm) 7/8"
(22mm)
2 1/4"
(57mm)
Door Bumper 1 7/8"
(48mm)
1 3/4"
(44mm)
Door Bumper
2 1/2"
(64mm)
1 1/4"
(32mm)
1 1/4"
(32mm)
1/8"
(3mm)
1 1/4"
(32mm)
2 1/2"
(64mm)
1 1/8"
(29mm)
Door Stile Door Stile Door Edge of
Stile
Door
Wall
COMMERCIAL HARDWARE (STANDARD)
Hinges, door latch, door keepers, clothes hooks, mounting brackets and door handles are constructed of 18-8, Type-304, heavy-gauge stainless steel with satin finish.
Threaded inserts are factory installed for securing hinges and door latch. Theft-resistant, stainless steel pin-in-head, torx screws are furnished for door hardware and all mounting brackets. Mounting screws for stile to panel bracket, latch keeper, and coat hook connections are through-bolted.
Balanced hinge is adjustable to hold door of unoccupied toilet compartment partially open or fully closed.
Toilet compartment door is locked from inside by sliding door latch into keeper. A locked compartment may be opened from outside by lifting door to disengage latch from keeper. Track of door latch prevents inswing door from swinging out beyond stile; on outswing door, the door keeper prevents it from swinging in beyond stile. Door handles and latch have operable parts that are operable with one hand and do not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist; and comply with ADA Sections 404.2.7 and 309.4. The force required to activate the operable parts shall be 5 pounds (22.2N) maximum. Black rubber bumper on the latch serves as door bumper for inswing door. #1040-42 LATCH ASSEMBLY
1040-35 KEEPER,
INSWING
1040-36 KEEPER,
OUTSWING
1040-39
PERPENDICULAR
ANCHORING DEVICE:
Leveling Device — 3/16" (5mm) thick, corrosionresistant, chromate- treated, double zinc-plated steel angle leveling bar bolted to stile; furnished with 3/8" (10mm) diameter threaded rods, hex nuts, lock washers, flat washers, spacer sleeves, expansion anchors, and shoe retainers.
Shoe — 18-8, Type-304, 22-gauge (0.8mm) stainless steel with satin finish; 4" (102mm) high. *Stiles for 1086 Series floor-to-ceiling anchored have a leveling device at each end.
#1002701 FLOOR ANCHOR
#1040-56 WALL
MOUNTED KEEPER
INSWING
#1000869 COAT
HOOK
The illustrations and descriptions herein are applicable to production as of the date of this Technical Data Sheet. 1090 Revised 7/19/23 The manufacturer reserves the right to, and does from time to time, make changes and improvements in designs and dimensions. © 2023 by Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc Door Remain Open
15 Degrees
3"
(76mm)
3 1/2"
(89mm)
1 1/2"
(38mm)
Door Normal
Closed Position
Door Beyond
Closed Position
#1002330
BARREL HINGE SET, L
#1002331
BARREL HINGE SET, J
#1002156
Hinge Cam
#1002491
1/4-20 x 1/2" (M6-1 x13mm)
Pin-in-Head Torx Screw
3 1/2"
(89mm)
3"
(76mm)
1 1/2"
(38mm)
CAM SETTINGS
Alignment Tab
Hinge Cam
Alignment Tab
Hinge Cam
Alignment Tab
Hinge Cam
#1000282
Alcove Bracket
(1/2" Panel to 3/4" Stile)
#1000351
L-Bracket
(Panel to Corner Stile)
#1000972
U-Bracket
(Panel to Perp. Stile)
#1000974
Y-Bracket
(Stile to Wall)
#1000975
F-Bracket
(Panel to Wall)
#1002499
#12 x 7/16" Pin-in-Head Torx Screw
(M5.5 x 11mm)
#1002495
#12 x 2" Pin-in-Head Torx Screw
(M5.5 x 50mm) Wall Screw
2"
(51mm)
1"
(25mm)
2 3/4"
(70mm)
2 1/2"
(64mm)
1 3/8"
(35mm)
3"
(76mm)
1/4"
(6mm)
2"
(51mm)
1/2"
(13mm)
1 5/8"
(41mm)
1/2"
(13mm)
1 3/4"
(44mm)
#1002664
#10-24 x3/8" Button Head
Torx Screw (to attach to sex-bolt
fastener through 1/2" panel)
#1002665
#10-24 x 5/8" Button Head
Torx Screw (to attach to sex-bolt
fastener through 3/4" stiles)
#1002666
#10-24 Pin-in-Head Sex Bolt,
1/4" Diameter, 1/2" Barrel
(fastener for all through-
bolted locations)
#1002331
BARREL HINGE SET, J
#1002330
BARREL HINGE SET, L
CAM SETTINGS
Hinges are constructed of 18-8, Type-304, heavy-gauge
stainless steel with satin finish. Threaded inserts are factory installed for securing hinges. Theft-resistant, stainless steel pin-in-head, torx screws are furnished for door hardware.
Balanced hinge is adjustable to hold door of unoccupied toilet compartment partially open or fully closed.
BRACKETS (STANDARD):
The illustrations and descriptions herein are applicable to production as of the date of this Technical Data Sheet. 1090 Revised 7/19/23 The manufacturer reserves the right to, and does from time to time, make changes and improvements in designs and dimensions. © 2023 by Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc 58"
(1473mm)
70"
(1778mm)
21"
(533mm)
25"
(635mm)
18"
(457mm)
58"
(1473mm)
23"
(584mm)
23"
(584mm)
18"
(457mm)
12"
(305mm)
85-1/ 4"
(2166mm)
58"
(1473mm)
12"
(305mm)
21"
(533mm)
25"
(635mm)
18"
(457mm)
58"
(1473mm)
23"
(584mm)
23"
(584mm)
18"
(457mm)
Headrail (Overhead-Braced)
Wall Bracket
Stile
Headrail
(cross section)
#1000375
Curtain Track
Pan Head
Phillips Screw
#1000937
#1000833
Curtain Carrier Hook
(7 per entrance)
Headrail
1091 SERIES FLOOR ANCHORED
1092 SERIES OVERHEAD-BRACED
Headrail Installation Detail
STANDARD:
#1091 - Barrel Hinge and Standard Bracket
MODEL OPTIONS:
#1091.67 - Continuous Hinge and Continuous Bracket
#1091.67D - Continuous Hinge and Standard Bracket
#1091.67P - Barrel Hinge and Continuous Bracket
Front View Side View
GAPLESS MODEL OPTIONS:
#1091G - Gapless, Barrel Hinge and Standard Bracket
#1091G.67 - Gapless, Continuous Hinge and Continuous Bracket #1091G.67D - Gapless, Continuous Hinge and Standard Bracket #1091G.67P - Gapless, Barrel Hinge and Continuous Bracket STANDARD:
#1092 - Barrel Hinge and Standard Bracket
MODEL OPTIONS:
#1092.67 - Continuous Hinge and Continuous Bracket
#1092.67D - Continuous Hinge and Standard Bracket
#1092.67DDS - Continuous Hinge, Standard Bracket and Door Stop #1092.67DS - Continuous Hinge, Continuous Bracket and Door Stop #1092.67P - Barrel Hinge and Continuous Bracket
GAPLESS MODEL OPTIONS:
#1092G - Gapless, Barrel Hinge and Standard Bracket
#1092G.67 - Gapless, Continuous Hinge and Continuous Bracket #1092G.67D - Gapless, Continuous Hinge and Standard Bracket #1092G.67DDS - Gapless, Continuous Hinge, Standard Bracket and Door Stop #1092G.67DS - Gapless, Continuous Hinge, Continuous Bracket and Door Stop #1092G.67P - Gapless, Barrel Hinge and Continuous Bracket Front View Side View
Curtain Track Installation Detail
The illustrations and descriptions herein are applicable to production as of the date of this Technical Data Sheet. 1090 Revised 7/19/23 The manufacturer reserves the right to, and does from time to time, make changes and improvements in designs and dimensions. © 2023 by Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc #1001368 U-Channel#1001371 Angle Bracket #1080-76 Z-Bracket 3"
(76.2mm)
5/8"
(15.9mm)
57 3/4"
(1467mm)
2"
(51mm)
1/2"
(12.7mm)
1/2"
(12.7mm)
57 3/4"
(1467mm)
This Side
to Material
This Side to
Wall or Panel
2"
(51mm)
1"
(25.4mm)
1"
(25.4mm)
57 3/4"
(1467mm)
57 1/2"
(1461mm)
3"
(76mm)
1 1/2"
(38mm)
3"
(76mm)
1 1/2"
(38mm)
#1002491
1/4-20 x 1/2" (M6-1 x13mm)
Pin-in-Head Torx Screw
#1001371 Angle Bracket #1001368 U-Channel #1080-76 Z-Bracket CONTINUOUS .67 BRACKET (OPTION):
Mounting brackets are constructed of 18-8, Type-304, heavy-gauge stainless steel with satin finish: one-piece, full-height U-channels and angle brackets are 18 gauge (1.2mm). U-channels secure panels to stiles, and angle brackets secure panels and stiles to walls. Theft-resistant, stainless steel pin-in-head, torx screws are furnished for U-channels, Z-bracket and angle brackets.
Mounting screws for stile to panel bracket is through-bolted. #1002921
Right-Hand Inswing
or Left-Hand Outswing
CONTINUOUS .67 HINGES (OPTION):
Hinges are constructed of 18-8, Type-304, heavy-gauge stainless steel with satin finish: one-piece, full-height hinge is 16 gauge (1.6mm); Theft-resistant, stainless steel pin-in-head, torx screws are furnished for door hardware. Doors are equipped with a gravity type self-closing hinge. Threaded inserts are factory installed to secure door hinge. The continuous hinge (.67 option) depends on the weight of the door to return the hinge to its closed position, which may result in door slamming. #1002920
Left-Hand Inswing or
Right-Hand Outswing HINGE CAM MAINTENANCE:
Cleaning and lubricating hinge is required to avoid
failure of hinge mechanism. Must use a Teflon
type based lubricant such as Tri-Flow Superior
Lubricant with P.T.F.E. It is not recommended to
use machine oil or WD-40 which will collect dust
and dirt.
The illustrations and descriptions herein are applicable to production as of the date of this Technical Data Sheet. 1090 Revised 7/19/23 The manufacturer reserves the right to, and does from time to time, make changes and improvements in designs and dimensions. © 2023 by Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc INSTALLATION:
Refer to Bobrick installation instructions packed with each shipment. Also available on bobrick.com. Form No. 1090-69.
NOTES:
1. Ceiling-hung and floor-to-ceiling toilet compartments require structural members (not furnished by Bobrick) in ceiling. For suggested types of ceiling support systems, see Bobrick Advisory Bulletin TB-32.
2. Wall backing is required to secure the mounting brackets of panels, stiles, and wall posts. For suggested wall backing, see Bobrick Advisory Bulletin TB-46.
3. Floor-anchored stiles are furnished with expansion shields and threaded rods. The expansion shields require minimum 2'' (50mm) penetration into minimum 3'' (75mm) thick structural concrete.
4. Bobrick stainless steel partition-mounted washroom accessories are available for mounting in panels between two compartments. See current Bobrick Catalog for description of accessories. Cutouts in panels can be pre-cut for Bobrick models at factory if location and size of all cutouts and Bobrick model numbers are furnished at time of order.
5. When the hinge cam has been set at the desired free resting position, "either closed or open" the top of the affixed components will be aligned.
GUARANTEE:
Bobrick toilet partitions including all hardware and mounting brackets are guaranteed to be free from defects in material and workmanship for a period of one year from date of purchase. Any products returned to Bobrick under this guarantee will be repaired or replaced at no charge. 25-Year Warranty: Bobrick extends a twenty-five-year limited warranty from date of purchase for SierraSeries Solid Color Reinforced Composite (SCRC) partition panels, doors, and stiles against breakage, delamination and corrosion when materials are properly installed, and normally used.
SPECIFICATION:
Water- and Fire-Resistant, Solid Color Reinforced Composite (SCRC) ____________________ (insert one product application:
toilet partition, dressing compartment, shower divider, urinal screen) shall be _______________ (insert one series: floor-anchored, overhead-braced, post-to-ceiling, wall-hung, floor-to-ceiling anchored, ceiling-hung) ____________________ (insert one series for Gap-Free: floor-anchored, overhead-braced, floor-to-ceiling anchored, ceiling-hung). Stiles, panels and doors shall be constructed of SCRC with GraffitiOff surface thermoset and integrally fused into one homogeneous piece. Surface, edges and core are to be same color. SCRC material shall be covered by a 25-year limited warranty against breakage, corrosion, and delamination. Stiles and doors shall be 3/4" (19mm) thick; panels shall be 1/2" (13mm) thick. All units shall meet ICC and NFPA Class B or UBC Class II, ASTM E 84 Fire-Resistance Standards. Stiles shall have leveling device that is concealed by a one-piece, Type-304, satin-finish stainless steel shoe that is 4" (102mm) high. Stiles, panels and doors shall be __________ (insert color name and number from current Bobrick Toilet Partition catalog). Headrails for overhead-braced compartments shall be anodized aluminum with satin finish.
All door hardware and mounting brackets shall be Type-304 stainless steel with satin finish. All doors shall be supplied with two hinges. Threaded inserts shall be factory installed for securing door hinges and latches. Theft-resistant, stainless steel pin-in-head Torx screws shall be furnished for door hardware and all mounting brackets. Through bolts shall be used for securing latch keeper, clothes hook and panel-to-stile brackets. Doors shall be equipped with a self-closing hinge. Hinges shall be adjustable to hold doors of unoccupied compartments partially open or fully closed. Hinges shall allow locked compartment to be opened in emergency from outside by lifting door to disengage latch from keeper. A clothes hook shall be furnished for each door. *To specify Gapless door and stile option, add suffix “G” to series number. Example: specify 1092G. **To specify Continuous hardware, replace end of specification paragraph with: .67 option All door hardware, U-channels, and angle brackets shall be Type-304 stainless steel with satin finish: one-piece, full-height hinges shall be 16 gauge (1.6mm); one-piece door keeper shall be 11 gauge (3.2mm); one-piece, full-height U-channels and angle brackets shall be 18 gauge (1.2mm). U-channels shall be furnished to secure panels to stiles, and angle brackets furnished to secure panels and stiles to walls. Theft-resistant, stainless steel pin-in-head, Torx screws shall be furnished for door hardware, U-channels, and angle brackets. Through bolts shall be used for securing latch keeper and panel-to-stile brackets. Threaded inserts shall be factory installed to secure all door hinges and latches. _________________ (insert one: Toilet Partitions, Dressing Compartments, Shower Dividers, Urinal Screens, Entrance Screens) shall be ____________________ Series (insert series number) of Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc., Clifton Park, New York; Jackson, Tennessee; Los Angeles, California; Bobrick Washroom Equipment Company, Scarborough, Ontario; Bobrick Washroom Equipment Pty. Ltd., Australia; and Bobrick Washroom Equipment Limited, United Kingdom.
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 05
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
Date: 01/26/2024
Project: Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project Change Order #: 05
Owner: CITY OF SALINAS
Contractor: HA Construction
TYPE OF CHANGE ORDER (Check one:) Errors and Omissions Unforeseen Site Condition
Owner Authorization
Emergency
Description of Change:
The following Proposed Change Order(s) are incorporated into the Contract by reference:
Ref. # Summary Description:
Amount:
1 The Contractor submitted RFI #6 for water leakage in the women's restroom, that was found to originate from the exterior wall. In response, the architect requested, and the City directed the Contractor to install a compacted, graded swale as per the details outlined in the sketch per the architect's RFI #6 response. Contractor submitted COR #5 requesting reimbursement for this work.
$7,401.94
Original Contract Amount: $151,000.00
Previous Change Order(s): $50,299.89
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order: $201,299.89 Amount of this Change Order: $7,401.94
New Contract Amount Including this Change Order: $208,701.83
Contract Time will be increased by 0 working days.
Reviewed by: GJ
Contractor agrees to perform the above-described work in accordance with the above terms and in compliance with applicable sections of the Project documents. The adjustment in the contract sum, if any, and the adjustment in the contract time, if any, set out in this Change Order shall constitute the entire compensation and/or adjustment in the contract time due C ontractor arising out of the change in the work covered by this Change Order, unless otherwise provided in this Change Order. No additions or deletions to this Change Order shall be allowed, except with written permission of the City. Contractor accepts the terms and conditions stated above as full and final settlement of any and all claims arising from this Change Order.
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 05
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
This Change Order is hereby agreed to, accepted and approved by:
Contractor: Date:
Project Manager/Construction Manager: Date:
(for) Cyril Charles, Project Manager
City: Date:
Luis Ochoa, Sr. Community Development Analyst
City: Date:
Adriana Robles, City Engineer
City: Date:
Lisa Brinton, Director (Or Designee)
HA Construction – Duraid Mohammed
10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa
Ca 91941
Phone: 916.237.6803
EM: [email protected]
Duraid Mohammed dba HA Construction
01/26/2024
01/26/2024
HA CONSTRUCTION QUALITY & RELEIBILITY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa, CA 91941, USA Phone: 916-237-6803 Email: [email protected]
Project: City of Salinas Change Order 03 Contract No.: 20031 Date: 01/22/2023 From: HA Construction
To: Gelareh Jokar
Subject: Building Side Moisture Pathway
Below is the cost proposal Building Side Moisture Pathway for the Women; s restrooms . The cost includes labor and materials in addition to the expenses mentioned in the table below.
Duraid Mohammed
dba
HA Construction
Item preparation
Discription Unit $/Unit Quantity Total
A Demo
1 Clean up the surfce from the grass hr 84.67 16 1,354.72 $ B Construction
2 layout the plan hr 84.67 4 338.68 $
3 Digging the pathway hr 84.67 32 2,709.44 $
4 Compacting the grade hr 84.67 8 677.36 $
5,080.20 $
Materials
1 Compator hr 25 8 200.00 $
Tax 8% 16.00 $
216.00 $
Admin %15 Profit Tax %7.5 Total L+ M
0.15 0.23 7.5%
762.03 $ 1,343.71$ 100.78 $ 7,401.94$
2 Reviewed and costs are acceptable
(CSG/01.24.2024)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
#5
Request #5
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 06
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
Date: 02/12/2024
Project: Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project Change Order #: 06
Owner: CITY OF SALINAS
Contractor: HA Construction
TYPE OF CHANGE ORDER (Check one:) Errors and Omissions Unforeseen Site Condition
Owner Authorization
Emergency
Description of Change:
The following Proposed Change Order(s) are incorporated into the Contract by reference:
Ref. # Summary Description:
Amount:
1 Per City’s request to add Graffiti Coating on all interior and exterior walls, the Contractor submitted COR #6 requesting reimbursement for this work $8,467.61
Original Contract Amount: $151,000.00
Previous Change Order(s): $54,904.63
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order: $205,904.63 Amount of this Change Order: $8,467.61
New Contract Amount Including this Change Order: $214,372.24
Contract Time will be increased by 3 working days.
Reviewed by: GJ
Contractor agrees to perform the above-described work in accordance with the above terms and in compliance with applicable sections of the Project documents. The adjustment in the contract sum, if any, and the adjustment in the contract time, if any, set out in this Change Order shall constitute the entire compensation and/or adjustment in the contract time due C ontractor arising out of the change in the work covered by this Change Order, unless otherwise provided in this Change Order. No additions or deletions to this Change Order shall be allowed, except with written permission of the City. Contractor accepts the terms and conditions stated above as full and final settlement of any and all claims arising from this Change Order.
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 06
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
This Change Order is hereby agreed to, accepted and approved by:
Contractor: Date:
Project Manager/Construction Manager: Date:
(for) Cyril Charles, Project Manager
City: Date:
Luis Ochoa, Sr. Community Development Analyst
City: Date:
Adriana Robles, City Engineer
City: Date:
Lisa Brinton, Director (Or Designee)
HA Construction – Duraid Mohammed
10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa
Ca 91941
Phone: 916.237.6803
EM: [email protected]
2/12/2024
2/12/2024
HA CONSTRUCTION QUALITY & RELEIBILITY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa, CA 91941, USA Phone: 916-237-6803 Email: [email protected]
Project: City of Salinas Change Order 06 Contract No.: 20031 Date: 01/24/2024 From: HA Construction
To: Gelareh Jokar
Subject: Anti-Graffiti Coating
Below is the cost proposal Anti-Graffiti Coating . The cost includes labor and materials in addition to the expenses mentioned in the table below.
Duraid Mohammed
dba
HA Construction
Item preparation
Discription Unit $/Unit Quantity Total
Laborer L
A Interior
1 Anti-Graffiti Coating hr 66.81 24 1,603.44 $
B Exterior
1 Anti-Graffiti Coating hr 66.81 32 2,137.92 $
3,741.36 $
Materials M Anti-Graffiti Coating No 500 24 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $
Tax 8% 960.00 $
12,960.00 $
Admin %15 Profit Tax %7.5 Total L+ M
0.15 0.23 7.5%
561.20 $ 989.59 $ 74.22 $ 18,252.15$
2/12/2024
. /5gal
- areas shown include 15%
wastage and 2 coats of
anti-graffiti coating
- 300 sf/gallon
- 1 painter roll 1600sf/day
3000 sf x 2
1400 sf x2
30 gals
(6) - 5 gals buckets
$3,000
$240
$3,240
ok
ok
$860.51
$64.54
$7906.41
GCs Signature:
Date:
$8,467.61
Corrected total amount
(GJ)
Reviewed and cost was negotiated with
the contractor.
(CSG/02/12/2024)
SI<YUCiH,S PE£
APIJElIl1uAf /4"41
4- PUk:Ii!$ t -ryPJ
ROOF FRAMING PlAN
N.T.S.
26'-8"
16'-4"
SLOPE lEVEL
SURFACE
ELEClRIC II OR'1£R
IIfRROR MEN
26'-8"
R..OORPLAN
N.T.S.
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY OF SALINAS
ENGINEERING DESIGN DIVISION
2".8" lRIM (STRUClURAL F;"OA)
~~():UvT'IPICAL)
KE'l'iHG SYSiEv..
4"1
S'O"
26'-8".
12' lEVEL AREA
5'-4"± -I
I
I
r-------- ---------------------,
I
I
I
ROUGH e100M FlNISH
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CD
I
". I
I
I
I
I
I
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~----------------
______ ~ I
@ / ffE::::~9--kt-/~~ Jl
I ____
I 4" CONC. stAB (ffiO\l1(IE ----_-...lL
: 1/S"1FT SLOPE 10 INTERIOR
I DRAINS) T'tP. _-==-------
L~___________ _
----~-, ~ !J
r:-"--.-/---.,.,-----I---~ l : ~
" I I ~
'" l:~ '" l:G
@ ! ~ l:
/~
I 1 lEI
: --':~:
• e-' I
" I '" II ..:. 11... ___ _ ________________________ ~ I I
I
26'-8"
FOUNDATION PLAN
N.T.S.
RESlROOM NO. 1 - FlNISH FlOOR ELEV. 72.00
RESTROOM NO. 2 - FINISH FlOOR ELEV. 52.JO
TE VALVE
MEN
WA1'ER + SANITARY SEWER
N.T.S.
VENT VENT
1-1/2"0 Col.
MEN
:® UGHllNG: UlIIAIlK HPGC 70 HIllE - 75 WATTS IJIllBS
LA .P. MAIN
PER sm. PLAN NO. JO.
Jill
C.
(~~~ g"'&~W~ DETAILS) BLOO. VENT + WAfITE utES
ISOMETAlC DIAGRAM (SCHEMATIC)
2" II TEL CONDUIT
RESTROOM NO. 1
UNOERGROU
N,T.S.
BtJLDING WATER RISER
ISOMETAlC DIAGRAM (SCHEMATIC)
N.T.S.
RESTROOM-A
VENTS Sl'AlJ. CONFORM
\\Ill! PLUI.IBING COOE.
2" GATE VALVE IN
CHRISTY e-J BOX
CONSTRUCT 2"0 p,V.Co
SCH. 40 WATER UHE
.Ie CONNECT TO EXIST.
4" WATER MAIN PER
COOE.
NATIVIDAD CREEK PARK
(PHASE 2) PLUMBING LAYOUT AND MISC. DETAILS
~
~
a"xII".,1i'"
CONC BlKS.
W'AU. SUI'I'lY
fl.JJSH VAl.1IE
~
T
IT
I
14 VERllCAL REIIAR • 24" O.C ("TW. ALL BLOC!( WAUS)
14 HORIZONTAL REBAR • 24" O.C. ("TW. ALL BLOCK WALLS)
(FlU. .ALL crus 'M1H GROUT)
/" ~ ._48" O.C &.
x6'"xfl0xI10 _ CONT.
IN SLAB ("TW.)
~~~~=:E
UOISiURE BARRlER
(6 MIL THICK) "TW.
2" SAND
465 II REIIAR
(CONT.) "TW.
SECTION=--_-t-ffi..!!B!......\
'U.s. r.::::Y
SECTION
N.T.S.
.(xa.'Rnx;E BOARD ~;m'
#1 DOUGVS FIR ~
. /lOTCH TOP Ib 0 RIDGE BOARlk
@
.::;:..SEC:::=='I1ON=:..:....-_cmN.T.S. __
~: A35 0 2""
L!l"TWICAL
SECllON
N.T.s.
!>LYWOOD SHEADNG. COX 0.1'. (CCX) AT OVER HANG. 'MTH ~ COllMaN' o 6" o.c. SUPPORTED ENDS AMD 12" FIELD, UNBLOCKfO•.&
FlBERGI..ASS SHINGlE ROOF
FELT (301) AND 1/2" PLYWOOD CCX 0.1'. SHEADNG
MO!SiURE BARRlER
(6 MIL THICK) TYP.
2" SAND
415 II REBAR
(CONT.)
2-1/2"
PRECAST CONCRETE
ClJLVERT 2' fI x 4' LONG
DRINKING FOUNTAIN
< is: 4-1/2."01<6" GALV.
(HANDICAPPED ST'tlE)~
TAMPER PROOF NUTS
IN ~A~fu~T
BOLDNG PAiERN W/MANUF. ~ I
FINISH GRADE OF GED-iEXnLE _ ~
PLANDNG AREA FABRIC I- 18" -I 12'I· iii,;: SCREENED A
A34 TO RAFTER __~~~;::::::::.:: .VEN! 0 32~ O'C·.Pl
Ie TO S.B., TYP.
~~t:::~~...o;;:-.----;:::::~::-:: HJ SEISMIC DES 0 24" O.C 2- MIN.
S"xII".,6" CONC. ---
HOLLOW BLOC!(
~
;::::. (P.T.)· ALT. 'MTH 5/6'" • ~2" ANCHOR BOLTS 0 48" O.C, l 3"1<6 PlATE 0.1'. (P.T.) 'MTH 5/6'" !M2" ANCHOR BOLT 0 32" O.C i START A.B.1I2" FROM ENDS OF s!u. If. MIN. 2 A.B./I'lECE. . . . BOLT 0 J2" o.c.. ~ • A _-"
JJI. (NOTCH PlATE TO SEAT RAfTER) -.. . --- .'
2-1/2
m ALT. NOTCH RAFTERS ... - --------
ALT, SIIIPSON VPA2/RAFTER. • . ", .... "" ............
.... .... EAVE DETAL
", ,
/' &. "
/ '
,/ 2"1<6" RAFTER DE "
, ' I \
I \
I \
I \
N.T.S. '----- 8"x8""6" CONe.. BU<S.
---=,~ stm.-
I EXPOSED UOUNnNG
J400 SEIRII::S 1-1/4" ("TW.)
DRAIN UNE: 1-1/2"0 SCH. 40 PVC
DFINKING FOUNTAIN DETAIL
N.T.S.
REINFORCING: #10 GA.
6"x6'" W.W.M.
I \
I \ 1----- CONCRETE
24"
I
H8GHT REOlJIRBAENTS FOR HAtDCAPPED <wHEa.CHAIR)
/,
/",--- .......
SECJ10N A-A
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
FRAilING ANCHORS (SIMPSON 1.35)
(TYPICAL)
• 0 GABlE ENOS
SOUTH 8 fYATJON
N.T.s.
, I~DR~I 0 RAFlER DE
I NAIL TO RAFTER
, ("TW.)
\ /
\ I
\ I
\ s'-O" I
\ I I
\ I
\ ' , ' , I
" /
" /, I, ",
"""'''''''''- #,//
----------"""""
GRAB BAA
ANCHOR
N.T.S.
INSTALL 1000DFICADON snlBOL
PER CALIFORNIA NON-RESIOENnAL
DISABlED ACCESS REGULAnONS
(lIEN AN!) WOllEN ENTRANCE DOOR)
r------------------------------
RESTROOM NO. I - FIN. FLOOR ELEV.
RESTROOIoI NO. 2 - FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 52.30
EAST WEST ELEVATION
IUS.
BLOCK
REVERSEO
SCREW
6'-0·
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT ..'" - -. NATIVIDAD
CREEK PARK
(PHASE 2)
RESTROOM-&'CITY OF SALINAS
ENGINEERING DESIGN OI\IISION ELEVATION AND MISC. DETAILS PLAN 342.22 sf
240.48 sf
13'-1/4"
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 07
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
Date: 02/08/2024
Project: Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project Change Order #: 07
Owner: CITY OF SALINAS
Contractor: HA Construction
TYPE OF CHANGE ORDER (Check one:) Errors and Omissions Unforeseen Site Condition
Owner Authorization
Emergency
Description of Change:
The following Proposed Change Order(s) are incorporated into the Contract by reference:
Ref. # Summary Description:
Amount:
1 Per the City’s request to add a surface mount deadbolt and lock protection cover to prevent any break-ins, the Contractor submitted COR #7 requesting reimbursement for this work
$3,186.02
Original Contract Amount: $151,000.00
Previous Change Order(s): $63,372.24
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order: $214,372.24 Amount of this Change Order: $3,186.02
New Contract Amount Including this Change Order: $217,558.26
Contract Time will be increased by 0 working days.
Reviewed by: GJ
Contractor agrees to perform the above-described work in accordance with the above terms and in compliance with applicable sections of the Project documents. The adjustment in the contract sum, if any, and the adjustment in the contract time, if any, set out in this Change Order shall constitute the entire compensation and/or adjustment in the contract time due C ontractor arising out of the change in the work covered by this Change Order, unless otherwise provided in this Change Order. No additions or deletions to this Change Order shall be allowed, except with written permission of the City. Contractor accepts the terms and conditions stated above as full and final settlement of any and all claims arising from this Change Order.
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 07
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
This Change Order is hereby agreed to, accepted and approved by:
Contractor: Date:
Project Manager/Construction Manager: Date:
(for) Cyril Charles, Project Manager
City: Date:
Luis Ochoa, Sr. Community Development Analyst
City: Date:
Adriana Robles, City Engineer
City: Date:
Lisa Brinton, Director (Or Designee)
HA Construction – Duraid Mohammed
10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa
Ca 91941
Phone: 916.237.6803
EM: [email protected]
2/12/2024
2/12/2024
HA CONSTRUCTION QUALITY & RELEIBILITY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa, CA 91941, USA Phone: 916-237-6803 Email: [email protected]
Project: City of Salinas Change Order 07 Contract No.: 20031 Date: 01/24/2024 From: HA Construction
To: Gelareh Jokar
Subject: Installing the locker armor
Below is the cost proposal Anti-Graffiti Coating. The cost includes labor and materials in addition to the expenses mentioned in the table below.
Duraid Mohammed
dba
HA Construction
Item preparation
Discription Unit $/Unit Quantity Total
A Installation
1 Installing the locker armor hr 66.81 8 534.48$
534.48$
Materials Fabricating the Locker armor No 750 3 2,250.00$ 2,250.00$
Tax 8% 180.00$
2,430.00$
Admin %15Profit Tax %7.5 Total L+ M
0.15 0.23 7.5%
80.17 $ 141.37$ 10.60 $ 3,186.02$
Based on:
- contractor to provide equal or higher gauge
material as the existing for the armor assembly.
- painting to match adjacent finish included
- lock assembly to have handle for exiting at
the interior
- City RAP approval prior to fabrication
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 08
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
Date: 02/08/2024
Project: Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation Project Change Order #: 08
Owner: CITY OF SALINAS
Contractor: HA Construction
TYPE OF CHANGE ORDER (Check one:) Errors and Omissions Unforeseen Site Condition
Owner Authorization
Emergency
Description of Change:
The following Proposed Change Order(s) are incorporated into the Contract by reference:
Ref. # Summary Description:
Amount:
1 Per the City’s request to submit a separate COR for the roof repair material, the Contractor submitted COR #8 requesting reimbursement for the material only. $2,797.20
Original Contract Amount: $151,000.00
Previous Change Order(s): $66,558.26
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order: $217,558.26 Amount of this Change Order: $2,797.20
New Contract Amount Including this Change Order: $220,355.46
Contract Time will be increased by 0 working days.
Reviewed by: GJ
Contractor agrees to perform the above-described work in accordance with the above terms and in compliance with applicable sections of the Project documents. The adjustment in the contract sum, if any, and the adjustment in the contract time, if any, set out in this Change Order shall constitute the entire compensation and/or adjustment in the contract time due C ontractor arising out of the change in the work covered by this Change Order, unless otherwise provided in this Change Order. No additions or deletions to this Change Order shall be allowed, except with written permission of the City. Contractor accepts the terms and conditions stated above as full and final settlement of any and all claims arising from this Change Order.
FINAL CHANGE ORDER
City of Salinas
CHANGE ORDER 08
12/21/23; Rev. 1 Page 1 of 2
This Change Order is hereby agreed to, accepted and approved by:
Contractor: Date:
Project Manager/Construction Manager: Date:
(for) Cyril Charles, Project Manager
City: Date:
Luis Ochoa, Sr. Community Development Analyst
City: Date:
Adriana Robles, City Engineer
City: Date:
Lisa Brinton, Director (Or Designee)
HA Construction – Duraid Mohammed
10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa
Ca 91941
Phone: 916.237.6803
EM: [email protected]
2/12/2024
2/12/2024
HA CONSTRUCTION QUALITY & RELEIBILITY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10111 Cliffwood Dr. La Mesa, CA 91941, USA Phone: 916-237-6803 Email: [email protected]
Project: City of Salinas Change Order 05 Contract No.: 20031 Date: 02/12/2024 From: HA Construction
To: Gelareh Jokar
Subject: Materials for the Defective Roof Fix
Below is the cost proposal of Materials for the Defective Roof Fix. The cost includes materials in addition to the expenses mentioned in the table below.
Duraid Mohammed
dba
HA Construction
Discription Unit $/Unit Quantity Total
A
Re Roofing Materials
2x4x 16 lumber no 8 15 120.00$
2x6x 16 lumber no 15 15 225.00$
2x8x 16 Lumber no 10 17 170.00$
4x8 OSB Sheathing Groved no 55 35 1,925.00$
nails/screws Ib 10 15 150.00$
2,590.00$
Tax 8% 207.20$
2,797.20$
Admin %15 Profit Tax %7.5 Total L + M + OC
0.15 0.23 7.5%
- $ - $ - $ 2,797.20$ Other Cost OC
Reviewed.
(CSG/02/12/2024)
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-084, Version: 1
Amendment No. 2 to the Master Service Agreement for Professional Services with CSG Consultants, Inc.
Approve a Resolution authorizing the approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Master Service Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Salinas and CSG Consultants, Inc. to provide design, inspection, project management, construction management, labor compliance and environmental services in a not-to- exceed amount of $1,054,420 and authorize the Interim City Manager or designee to execute any modifications or amendments.
City of Salinas Printed on 3/8/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 12, 2024
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FROM: LISA BRINTON, DIRECTOR
THROUGH: FRANCISCO BRAMBILA, ACTING PLANNING MANAGER
BY: CRISTINA GONZALEZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANALYST
LUIS OCHOA, SR. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANALYST
TITLE: AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH CSG CONSULTANTS, INC.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing:
1. the approval of Amendment N o. 2 to the Master Service Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Salinas and CSG Consultants, Inc. increasing the not-to- exceed amount to $1,054,420 to provide design, inspection, project management, construction management, labor compliance and environmental services for four capital improvement projects (CIP); and
2. the Interim City Manager or designee to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Master Service Agreement for Professional Services with CSG Consultants, Inc and any modifications or amendments necessary to support the completion of the four CIP projects; and
3. the Community Development Director or designee to approve CSG Consultants’ on-going performance of services without the need for subsequent Professional Service Agreements provided CSG Consultants Inc. is, at all times throughout the term thereof, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Master Service Agreement for Professional Services, Amendment No. 1, and Amendment No. 2.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On February 7, 2023, City Council approved Resolution No. 22588 authorizing execution of a Master Service Agreement for Professional Servic es (Agreement) between the City of Salinas (City) and CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) to provide design, inspection, project management, construction management, labor compliance , and environmental services for four capital Page | 2
improvements projects. On November 14, 202 3, through Resolution No. 22842, City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement to increase the not to exceed amount for compensation to $882,042 and clarify the scope of work for each Capital Improvement Project (CIP). However, after receiving change orders for the Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV and a proposal for Chinatown Neighborhood Improvements projects, the current approved not to exceed compensation amount is not sufficient to cover all services requested. Amendment No. 2 to adjust increases the compensation amounts for Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV and Chinatown Neighborhood Improvements CIP projects and modifies the not to exceed amount from $882,042 to $1,054,420. These projects are funded through Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), CIP 9125, and CIP 9070 funds.
BACKGROUND:
On February 7, 2023, after a Request for Qualification (RFQ) process, City Council approved an Agreement between the City of Salinas and CSG Consultants, Inc. to provide design, inspection, project management, construction management, labor compliance, and environmental services to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and /or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), for four capital improvement projects. These projects include the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation, Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV, Chinatown Navigation Center Building Improvements and Shower Trailer Installation, and Chinatown Neighborhood Improvements projects.
On July 20, 2023, CDD approved proposals for three significant projects: Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation, Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV, and Chinatown Navigation Center Building Improvements and Shower Trailer Installation projects. Sub sequently, CSG commenced work on these three projects.
The Agreement approved by City Council on February 7, 2023, was amended on November 14, 2023. This Amendment No. 1 adjusted the Agreement to further clarify the scope of services , define the roles between the City and CSG; and add a clause to the Compensation Section to stipulate an amount not-to-exceed of $882,042 for the approved projects, including contingencies.
In January 2024, CSG submitted a proposal for the Chinatown Neighborhood Improvements in the amount of $250,280 . Additionally, City staff requested several Change Orders for Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV Project, leading to additional development costs for the project.
Following a thorough r eview of the proposals, staff recommends amending the P rofessional Service Agreement to increase the not-to-exceed value to $1,054,420, including contingencies .
Amendment No. 2 will incorporate the updated not-to-exceed amount for each individual project as well as the new revised not-to-exceed amount for the Master Services Agreement.
The following table illustrates the proposal received for the Chinatown Neighborhood Improvements, change orders for the Sherwood Recreation Center Phase IV , and contingencies.
Page | 3
The projects are funded with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), CIP 9125, and CIP 9070 funds which were previously approved by City Council.
Project Proposal
Amount
Contingency Total
Amount
Funding
Source
Natividad Creek Park Restroom
Rehabilitation Project $174,585* $26,188* $200,773* CDBG Sherwood Recreation Center –
Phase IV Project $329,552 $82,355 $411,906 CDBG
Chinatown Navigation Center
Building Improvements and
Shower Trailer Installation Project
$112,079* $16,812* $128,891* CIP 9125
Chinatown Neighborhood
Improvements Project $250,280 62,570 312,850 CDBG
CIP 9070
Totals $866,496 $187,925 $1,054,420
* Amounts to remain the same, no changes
The amendment will enable the Housing Division to proceed with the design, specifications completion and the release of Call for Bids for the Sherwood Recreation Center Phase IV and Chinatown Neighborhood Improvement Projects.
DEPARMENT COORDINATION:
Internal department coordination on this item involved the CDD Housing and Community Development Division, Library and Community Services Department, Public Works Department, Finances, and the City Attorney’s Office.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action of approving Amendment No. 2 is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378). Each of the four projects either have been or will be evaluated for both CEQA and/or NEPA compliance.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
The proposed project and action support the City of Salinas Strategic Plan 2022-2025 Goals and Strategies related to Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, Public Safety, and Youth and Seniors through the provision of improved public facilities.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
There is no General Fund fiscal impact associated with the approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Master Services Agreement with CSG as the associated costs for the four projects are funded by Page | 4
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) , CIP 9125 (Account Code 5800.30.9125) , and CIP 9070 (Account Code 5800.30.9070) funds previously approved by City Council.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Amendment No. 2 to the Master Services Agreement with CSG Master Services Agreement between the City of Salinas and CSG Consultants, Inc Amendment No. 1 to the Master Services Agreement with CSG Chinatown Neighborhood Improvements Proposal
Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV Change Orders
Resolution No. 22588
Resolution No. 22842 – Amendment No. 1
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MASTER SERVICE
AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND CSG CONSULTANTS, INC.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department identified the need to utilize on - call consultants to provide design, inspection, project management, construction management, labor compliance, and environmental services to assist the department with any building projects, and other services related to design and construction of four Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs); and
WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023, City Council approved Resolution No. 22588 authorizing the execution of a Master Services Agreement between the City of Salinas (City) and CSG Consultants, Inc (CSG) to provide design, inspection, project management, construction management, labor compliance, and CEQA/NEPA environmental consultant for several City CIPs; and
WHEREAS, on July 20, 2023, the Community Development Department approved proposals for Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation, Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV, and Chinatown Navigation Center Building Improvements and Shower Trailer Installation projects and CSG started to perform services; and
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2023 , City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to the Master Services Agreement between the City and CSG through Resolution No. 22842, to further clarify the scope of services, define the roles between the City and CSG; and add a clause to the Compensation Section to stipulate an amount not-to-exceed of $882,042 for the approved projects, including contingencies; and
WHEREAS, in January 2024, CSG submitted a proposal for the Chinatown Neighborhood Improvements in the amount of $250,280; and
WHEREAS, City staff also requested several Change Orders for Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV Project, leading to additional development cost for the project; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends amending the Professional Service Agreement to modify the allocated funding to the Sherwood Recreation Center - Phase IV Project to an amount not to exceed $411,906 and the Chinatown Neighborhood Improvement Project to an amount not to exceed $312,850 to reflect the proposals , change orders, and contingency amounts for each the projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action of approving Amendment No. 2 is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378). Each of the four projects either have been or will be evaluated for both CEQA and/or NEPA compliance.
2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , that the Salinas City Council approves Amendment No. 2 to the Master Services Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Salinas and CSG Consultants, Inc. to provide design, inspection, project management, construction management, labor compliance, and environmental services to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and/or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for four capital improvement projects in the amount not to exceed $1,054,420; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the Interim City Manager or designee is hereby authorized to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Master Service Agreement for Professional Services with CSG Consultants, Inc and any modifications or amendments necessary to support the completion of identified projects; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Community Development Director or designee is hereby authorized to approve CSG Consultants’ on-going performance of services without the need for subsequent Professional Service Agreements provided CSG Consultants is, at all times throughout the term thereof, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Master Service Agreement for Professional Services, Amendment No. 1, and Amendment No. 2 approved through this Resolution.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED:
______________________________
Kimbley Craig, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
Version: November 2022
AGREEMENT —AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC., AND CITY OF SALINAS
This Amendment No. 2 to the Master Service Agreement for Professional Services (the “Amendment”) is entered into this 12th day of March 2024, by and between the City of Salinas (the “City”) and CSG Consultants, Inc., (the “Consultant” or “CSG”). City and Consultant may be individually referred to herein as a “Party” and collectively the City and Consultant may be referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant first entered into a Master Service Agreement for Professional Services effective February 7, 2023 , pursuant to which Consultant agreed to act as and provide certain services to the City for compensation (the “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, on November 14, 2023, the City and Consultant entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement to clarify the scope of service, define the roles between City and Consultant and to establish a not to exceed compensation amount of $882,042; and
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant desire to further amend the Agreement to increase the not to exceed amount to $1,054,420 for the Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation, Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV, Chinatown Navigation Center Building Improvements and Shower Trailer Installation, and Chinatown Neighborhood Improvements projects, as specified in CSG’s proposals; and NOW, THEREFORE, in mutual consideration of the terms and conditions set forth below, the Parties agree as follows:
TERMS
1. The Agreement, “Section 1. Scope of Service” is amended to increase the not to exceed amount for the Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV to $411,906 and to establish a not to exceed amount of $312,850 for Chinatown Neighborhood Improvements projects, and to restate each project scope of work.
It is understood by the City and Consultant that Consultants performs or secures the performance of design, inspection, project, construction management, labor compliance services, environmental services to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and/or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and related services for the City on an on -going basis for the following Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs):
1) Natividad Creek Park Restroom Rehabilitation
a. Not To Exceed Amount: $200,773
b. Scope of Work
i. Inspection Services
ii. Project Management
iii. Construction Management
iv. Labor Compliance (Davis-Bacon and Prevailing Wages)
2) Sherwood Recreation Center – Phase IV,
a. Not To Exceed Amount: $411,906
Version: November 2022
b. Scope of Work
i. Design
ii. Inspection Services
iii. Project Management
iv. Construction Management
v. Labor Compliance (Davis-Bacon and Prevailing Wages)
vi. CEQA and NEPA Environmental Services
3) Chinatown Navigation Center Building Improvements and Shower Trailer Installation, and a. Not To Exceed Amount: $128,891
b. Scope of Work
I. Design
II. Inspection Services
III. Project Management
IV. Construction Management
V. Labor Compliance (Davis-Bacon and Prevailing Wages)
VI. CEQA Environmental Services
4) Chinatown Neighborhood Improvements projects.
a. Not To Exceed Amount: $312,850
b. Scope of Work
I. Design
II. Inspection Services
III. Project Management
IV. Construction Management
V. Labor Compliance (Davis-Bacon and Prevailing Wages)
VI. CEQA and NEPA Environmental Services
Under this agreement, CSG shall not render any construction work for any of the previously stated projects. CSG will assist the City in the preparation of the project specifications, but the City shall be responsible for releasing the Call for Bids for each of the projects . CSG will also assist in reviewing bid proposals received, but the City will ultimately be responsible for accepting a lowest bid proposal from a qualified General Contractor (GC) through a competitive close d-bid process for each project per the City’s requirements. CSG shall not enter into any construction contracts on behalf of the City for any of the previously stated projects, as that will be the responsibility of the City.
CSG will also assist the City with environmental services for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as well as Labor Compliance for all projects. Labor Compliance will include Davis -Bacon and California Prevailing Wage monitoring and regulations. CSG will follow the City of Salinas Labor Compliance Program approved by City Council on October 27, 2020.
The City shall collect all required documentation on the Call for Bids and ensure all City, State, and Federal grant requirements are met before entering into a Construction Contract with a qualified General Contractor , and any subcontra ctors included under the General Contractor . On each occasion the Consultant performs services for the City, the Consultant shall advise the City in writing of the scope of services to be provided and the cost of, and estimated time to perform services. Consultant shall not proceed to perform any such service until City and Consultant have
Version: November 2022
established a project cost, a completion schedule and a time period for performance, and the City has given its written authorization to perform. Written approval for p erformance and compensation may be granted by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director authorization shall be limited to the maximum not to exceed amount stipulated in this Amendment and as outlined in Section 1 and Section 3.
2. The Agreement, “Section 3. Compensation”, is amended to restate in this section the following:
City hereby agrees to pay Consultant for services rendered the City pursuant to this Agreement on a time and materials basis according to the rates of compensation as set forth in Exhibit B an amount not to exceed One Million Fifty-Four Thousand Four Hundred dollars ($1,054,420) as set forth in proposals submitted by CSG for each individual project.
3. All other covenants, terms, and conditions set forth in the Agreement, Amendment No. 1 and not amended by this Amendment No. 2 shall remain in full force and effect as if fully set forth herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as authorized representatives of the City and Consultant have entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.
City of Salinas CSG Consultants, Inc.
By: By:
Jim Pia, Interim City Manager Cyrus Kianpour, President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
Rhonda Combs, Assistant City Attorney
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 1 of 16 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND CSG
CONSULTANTS, INC.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 2 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
Contents
RECITALS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 TERMS ........................................................................................................................................... 4
1. Scope of Service. ................................................................................................................. 4
2. Term; Completion Schedule. ............................................................................................... 4
3. Compensation. ..................................................................................................................... 4
4. Billing. ................................................................................................................................. 4
5. Meet & Confer. .................................................................................................................... 5
6. Additional Copies................................................................................................................. 5
7. Responsibility of Consultant. ............................................................................................... 5
8. Responsibility of City. ......................................................................................................... 5
9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. .................................................................................... 6
10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. ................................................................................... 6
11. Insurance. ............................................................................................................................. 6
12. Access to Records. ............................................................................................................... 6
13. Non-Assignability. ............................................................................................................... 6
14. Changes to Scope of Work. ................................................................................................. 6
15. Ownership of Documents. ................................................................................................... 7
16. Termination. ......................................................................................................................... 7
17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. ................................................................ 8
18. Exhibits Incorporated. .......................................................................................................... 8
19. Independent Contractor. ....................................................................................................... 8
20. Integration and Entire Agreement. ....................................................................................... 8
21. Jurisdiction and Venue. ........................................................................................................ 8
22. Severability .......................................................................................................................... 8
23. Notices. ................................................................................................................................ 9
24. Nondiscrimination................................................................................................................ 9
25. Conflict of Interest. .............................................................................................................. 9
26. Headings. ........................................................................................................................... 10
27. Attorneys’ Fees .................................................................................................................. 10
28. Non-Exclusive Agreement. ................................................................................................ 10
29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement. ........................................................................ 10
30. Licenses.............................................................................................................................. 10
31. Counterparts. ...................................................................................................................... 10 DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 3 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
32. Legal Representation. ........................................................................................................ 10
33. Joint Representation. .......................................................................................................... 10
34. Warranty of Authority........................................................................................................ 11
35. No Waiver of Rights. ......................................................................................................... 11 Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements .............................................................................................. 12 Exhibit B- Fee Schedule ............................................................................................................... 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 4 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND CSG CONSTULTANTS, INC.
This Master Service Agreement for Professional Services (the “Agreement” and/or “Contract”) is made and entered into this 7th day of February 2023, between the City of Salinas, a California Charter city and municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”), and CSG Consultants, Inc. (dba CSG), a California corporation (hereinafter “Consultant”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that he, she, or it is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Consultant is willing to render such professional services, as hereinafter defined, on the following terms and conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant agree as follows:
TERMS
1. Scope of Service. It is understood by the City and Consultant that Consultants performs or secures the performance of Project Management a nd Design Consultant Services , and related services for the City on an on-going basis. On each occasion Consultant performs services for the City, Consultant shall advise the City in writing of the scope of services to be provided and the cost of, and estimated time to perform services. Consultant shall not proceed to perform any such service until City and Consultant have established a project cost, a completion schedule and a time period for performance, and the City has given its written authorization to perform. Written approval for performance and compensation may be granted by the Community Development Department, Housing Division Planning Manager.
2. Term; Completion Schedule. This Agreement shall commence on February 7, 2023, and shall terminate on February 7, 2028, unless extended in writing by either party upon (30) days written notice. This Agreement may be extended only upon mutual written consent of the parties, and may be terminated only pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
3. Compensation. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant for services rendered the City pursuant to this Agreement on a time and materials basis according to the rates of compensation as set forth in Exhibit B.
4. Billing. Consultant shall submit to City an itemized invoice, prepared in a form satisfactory to City, describing its services and costs for the period covered by the invoice. Except as specifically authorized by City, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one person. Consultant’s bills shall include the following information to which such services cost or pertain:
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 5 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
(A) A brief description of services performed;
(B) The date the services were performed;
(C) The number of hours spent and by whom;
(D) A brief description of any costs incurred; and
(E) The Consultant’s signature.
Any such invoices shall be in full accord with any and all applicable provisions of this Agreement.
City shall make payment on each such invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt; provided, however, that if Consultant submits an invoice which is incorrect, incomplete, or not in accord with the provisions of this Agreement, City shall not be obligated to process any payment to Consultant until thirty (30) days after a correct and complying invoice has been submitted by Consultant. The City shall process undisputed portion immediately.
5. Meet & Confer. Consultant agrees to meet and confer with City or its agents or employees with regard to services as set forth herein as may be required by the City to ensure timely and adequate performance of the Agreement.
6. Additional Copies. If City requires additional copies of reports, or any other material which Consultant is required to furnish as part of the services under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide such additional copies as are requested, and City shall compensate Consultant for the actual costs related to the production of such copies by Consultant.
7. Responsibility of Consultant. By executing this Agreement, Consultant agrees that the services to be provided and work to be performed under this Agreement shall be performed in a fully competent manner. By executing this Agreement, Consultant further agrees and represents to City that the Consultant possesses, or shall arrange to secure from others, all of the necessary professional capabilities, experience, resources, and facilities necessary to provide the City the services contemplated under this Agreement and that City relies upon the professional skills of Consultant to do and perform Consultant’s work. Consultant further agrees and represents that Consultant shall follow the current, gene rally accepted practices in this area to the profession to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding the projects for which the services are rendered under this Agreement.
8. Responsibility of City. To the extent appropriate to the projects to be completed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, City shall:
(A) Assist Consultant by placing at its disposal all available information pertinent to the projects, including but not limited to, previous reports and any other data relative to the projects. Nothing contained herein shall obligate City to incur any expense in connection with completion of studies or acquisition of information not otherwise in the possession of City.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 6 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
(B) Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals, and other documents presented by Consultant, and render verbally or in writing as may be appropriate, decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of Consultant.
(C) Steve Carrigan, City Manager, or his designee, shall act as City’s representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. Such person shall have the complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements, and systems pertinent to Consultant’s services. City may unilaterally change its representative upon notice to the Consultant.
(D) Give prompt written notice to Consultant whenever City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in a project.
9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. Acceptance by the City of the work to be performed under this Agreement does not operate as a release of Consultant from professional responsibility for the work performed.
10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless.
Consultant shall hold harmless, defend, and indemnify City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorney fees arising out of the performance of the work described herein, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Consultant , any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, except where caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City.
11. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance meeting the requirements specified in Exhibit A hereto.
12. Access to Records. Consultant shall maintain all preparatory books, records, documents, accounting ledgers, and similar materials including but not limited to calculation and survey notes relating to work performed for the City under this Agreement on file for at least three (3) years following the date of final payment to Consultant by City. Any duly authorized representative(s) of City shall have access to such records for the purpose of inspection, audit, and copying at reasonable times during Consultant’s usual and customary business hours. Consultant shall provide proper facilities to City’s representative(s) for such access and inspection.
13. Non-Assignability. It is recognized by the parties hereto that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. This Agreement is personal to Consultant and shall not be assigned by it without express written approval of the City.
14. Changes to Scope of Work. City may at any time, and upon a minimum of ten (10) days written notice, seek to modify the scope of services to be provided for any project to be completed under this Agreement. Consultant shall, upon receipt of said notice, determine the impact on both DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 7 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
time and compensation of such change in scope and notify City in writing. Upon agreement between City and Consultant as to the extent of said impacts to time and compensation, an amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared describing such changes. Execution of the amendment by City and Consultant shall constitute the Consultant’s notice to proceed with the changed scope.
15. Ownership of Documents. Title to all final documents, including drawings, specifications, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software (if purchased on the City’s behalf), video and audio tapes, software output, and any other materials with respect to work performed under this Agreement shall vest with City at such time as City has compensated Consultant, as provided herein, for the services rendered by Consultant in connection with which they were prepared. City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant against all damages, claims, lawsuits, and losses of any kind including defense costs arising out of any use of said documents, drawings, and/or specifications on any other project without written authorization of the Consultant.
16. Termination.
(A) City shall have the authority to terminate this Agreement, upon ten days written notice to Consultant, as follows:
(1) If in the City’s opinion the conduct of the Consultant is such that the interest of the City may be impaired or prejudiced, or
(2) For any reason whatsoever.
(B) Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to payment of such amount as fairly compensates Consultant for all work satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination based upon the Consultant’s rates shown in Exhibit B and/or Section 3 of this Agreement, except that:
(1) In the event of termination by the City for Consultant’s default, City shall deduct from the amount due Consultant the total amount of additional expenses incurred by City as a result of such default. Such deduction from amounts due Consultant are made to compensate City for its actual additional costs incurred in securing satisfactory performance of the terms of this Agreement, including but not limited to, costs of engaging another consultant(s) for such purposes. In the event that such additional expenses shall exceed amounts otherwise due and payable to Consultant hereunder, Consultant shall pay City the full amount of such expense.
(C) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, Consultant shall:
(1) Upon receipt of written notice of such termination promptly cease all services on this project, unless otherwise directed by City; and
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 8 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
(2) Deliver to City all documents, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software output, video and audio tapes, and any other materials provided to Consultant or prepared by or for Consultant or the City in connection with this Agreement. Such material is to be delivered to City in completed form; however, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 15 herein, City may condition payment for services rendered to the date of termination upon Consultant’s delivery to the City of such material.
(D) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, City is hereby expressly permitted to assume the p rojects and complete them by any means, including but not limited to, an agreement with another party.
(E) The rights and remedy of the City and Consultant provided under this Section are not exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or appearing in any other section of this Agreement.
17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations . Services performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance and full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and City laws and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder.
18. Exhibits Incorporated. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement and attached to it are hereby incorporated in it by this reference. In the event there is a conflict between any of the terms of this Agreement and any of the terms of any exhibit to the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall control the respective duties and liabilities of the parties.
19. Independent Contractor. It is expressly understood and agreed by both parties that Consultant, while engaged in carrying out and complying with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Consultant expressly warrants not to represent, at any time or in any manner, that Consultant is an employee or servant of the City.
20. Integration and Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters contained herein. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except by amendment in writing signed by both parties.
21. Jurisdiction and Venue . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California , County of Monterey, and City of Salinas .
Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in the State of California, in the County of Monterey or in the appropriate federal court with jurisdiction over the matter.
22. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with said laws, but the remainder of the Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 9 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
23. Notices.
(A) Written notices to the City hereunder shall, until further notice by City, be addressed to:
City Manager
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
With a copy to:
City Attorney
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
(B) Written notices to the Consultant shall, until further notice by the Consultant, be addressed to:
Peykan Abbassi, PE, Principal-in-Charge
CSG Consultants, Inc.
550 Pilgrim Drive
Foster City, CA 94404
[email protected]
(C) The execution of any such notices by the City Manager shall be effective as to Consultant as if it were by resolution or order of the City Council, and Consultant shall not question the authority of the City Manager to execute any such notice.
(D) All such notices shall either be delivered personally to the other party’s designee named above, or shall be deposited in the United States Mail, properly addressed as aforesaid, postage fully prepaid, and shall be effective the day following such deposit in the mail.
24. Nondiscrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, ancestry, creed, sex, national origin, familial status, sexual orientation, age (over 40 years) or disability. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion , ancestry, creed, sex, national origin, familial status, sexual orientation, age (over 40 years) or disability.
25. Conflict of Interest. Consultant warrants and declares that it presently has no interest, and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, in any manner or degree which will render the services required under the provisions of this Agreement a violation of any applicable local, state or federal law. Consultant further declares that, in the performance of this DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 10 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
Agreement, no subcontractor or person having such an interest shall be employed. In the event that any conflict of interest should nevertheless hereinafter arise, Consultant shall promptly notify City of the existence of such conflict of interest so that City may determine whether to terminate this Agreement. Consultant further warrants its compliance with the Political Reform Act (Government Code section 81000 et seq.) and Salinas City Code Chapter 2A that apply to Consultant as the result of Consultant’s performance of the work or services pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
26. Headings. The section headings appearing herein shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify, or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions of this Agreement.
27. Attorneys’ Fees. In case suit shall be brought to interpret or to enforce this Agreement, or because of the breach of any other covenant or provision herein contained, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to such costs as may be allowed by the Court. City’s attorneys’ fees, if awarded, shall be calculated at the market rate.
28. Non-Exclusive Agreement. This Agreement is non- exclusive and both City and Consultant expressly reserves the right to contract with other entities for the same or similar services.
29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, the parties do not intend to create any obligations express or implied other than those set out herein; further, this Agreement shall not create any rights in any party not a signatory hereto.
30. Licenses. If a license of any kind, which term is intended to include evidence of registration, is required of Consultant, its representatives, agents or subcontractors by federal, state or local law, Consultant warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good standing, and that any applicable bond posted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
31. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single agreement.
32. Legal Representation. Each party affir ms that it has been represented , if it so chose, by legal counsel of its own choosing regarding the preparation and the negotiation of this Agreement and the matters and claims set forth herein, and that each of them has read this Agreement and is fully aware of its contents and its legal effect. Neither party is relying on any statement of the other party outside the terms set forth in this Agreement as an inducement to enter into this Agreement.
33. Joint Representation. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any party. No presumptions or rules of interpretation based upon the identity of the party preparing or drafting the Agreement, or any part thereof, shall be applicable or invoked.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 11 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
34. Warranty of Authority. Each party represents and warrants that it has the right, power, and authority to enter into this Agreement. Each party further represents and warrants that it has given any and all notices, and obtained any and all consents, powers, and authorities, necessary to permit it, and the persons entering into this Agreement for it, to enter into this Agreement.
35. No Waiver of Rights. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. The failure to provide notice of any breach of this Agreement or failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver thereof.
Failure on the part of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of such provision or any other provision. A waiver by the City of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be construed as waiver(s) of any other condition of performance under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the date first written above.
CITY OF SALINAS
____________________________
Steve Carrigan
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
□ Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney, or
□ Rhonda Combs, Assistant City Attorney
CONSULTANT
___________________________________
By (Printed Name): ___________________
Its (Title): ___________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855 Cyrus Kianpour
President
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 12 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements
Insurance Requirements
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Consultant , his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. With respect to General Liability and Professional Liability, coverage should be maintained for a minimum of five (5) years after Agreement completion.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(A) Commercial General Liability (“CGL”): Insuranc e Services Office Form (“ISO”) CG 00 01 covering CGL on an occurrence basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (B) Automobile Liability: ISO Form CA 0001 covering any auto, or if Consult ant has no owned autos, hired and non- owned, with limit s no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(C) Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with S tatutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(D) Professional Liability (also known as Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to the work being performed, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate per policy period of one year.
If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Salinas requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
Additional Insured Status
The City of Salinas , its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 11 85, or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 13 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this Agreement or the project described within this Agreement, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City , its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.
Waiver of Subrogation
Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Salinas for all work performed by the Consultant , its employees, agents, a nd subcontractors.
Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared by Consultant to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, Consultant shall provide coverage to reduce or eliminate such self -insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or the consultant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administrations, and defense expenses. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:
1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of this Agreement or the beginning of Agreement work.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Agreement of work.
3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Dat e prior to the Agreement effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of Agreement work.
4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 14 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable insurance language effecting coverage required by this Agreement . All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.
However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.
Subcontractors
Consultant shall require a nd verify that all sub -consultants and/or subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that Entity is an additional insured on insurance required from such sub-consultants and/or subcontractors.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Maintenance of Insurance
Maintenance of insurance by Consultant as specified shall in no way be interpreted as relieving Consultant of its indemnification obligations or any responsibility whatsoever and the Consultant may carry, at its own expense, such additional insurance as it deems necessary.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 15 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
Exhibit B- Fee Schedule
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 16 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. January 2021 Page 17 of 17 CSG Consultants, Inc.
February 2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: A3A1AF79-0B98-47AE-BFF5-B216E76F6855