Agenda packet — Salinas City Council, April 7, 2026

Tuesday, April 7, 2026
4:00 PM
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas, CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org

SALINAS ROTUNDA
City Council
Mayor Dennis Donohue
Councilmembers:

Jose Luis Barajas, District 1 - Tony Barrera, District 2 Margaret D'Arrigo, District 3 - Gloria De La Rosa, District 4 Andrew Sandoval, District 5 - Aurelio Salazar, District 6 Rene Mendez, City Manager
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
City Clerk’s Office: (831) 758-7381
Meeting Agenda - Final
1 April 7, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda - Final

ZOOM WEBINAR PARTICIPATION
JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://cityofsalinas.zoom.us/j/89474788822
To participate telephonically, call any number below:
+1 669 444 9171 US +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 205 0468 US +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 719 359 4580 US +1 305 224 1968 US +1 309 205 3325 US +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 360 209 5623 US +1 386 347 5053 US +1 507 473 4847 US +1 564 217 2000 US +1 646 931 3860 US +1 689 278 1000 US +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) Webinar ID: 894 7478 8822
If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

CLOSED SESSION
Receive public communications from the audience on Closed session items.

The City Council will recess to closed session pursuant to:

ID#26-153 a. Labor Negotiations - California Government Code Section §54957.6 with its designated labor representatives Rene Mendez, City Manager; Lisa G. Murphy, Assistant City Manager; Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney; Katherine Hogan, Assistant City Attorney; Selina Andrews, Finance Director; Marina Horta-Gallegos, Human Resources Director; Sylvia Enriquez, Human Resources Manager; and Che Johnson, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, regarding labor relations with Service Employees International Union (SEIU), SEIU Supervisors, Salinas Municipal Employees Association/SEIU, Association of Management Personnel, Police Officers Association, Police Management Association, International Association of Firefighters, Fire Supervisors Association, Confidential Non-Management Employees, Confidential Management Employees, and Department Directors.

THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECONVENE IN THE ROTUNDA AT 4:30 P.M.

NEW EMPLOYEE WELCOME AND PROMOTIONS

PROCLAMATIONS

Page 2 ends

2 April 7, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda - Final
National Community Development Week April 6-10, 2026
National Library Week, April 19-25, 2026
Fair Housing Month, April 2026
Sexual Assault Awareness Month, April 2026

PUBLIC COMMENT PROCEDURES
If you wish to make a general public comment or comment on a specific agenda item, you are encouraged to attend the City Council meeting in person. Public comment may also be submitted via email at [email protected] and will be entered into the record. Public comments generally are limited to two minutes per speaker; the Mayor may further limit the time for public comments depending on the agenda schedule.

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Receive public communications on items that are not on the agenda and that are in the City of Salinas’ subject matter jurisdiction. Comments on Consideration, Public Hearing items, and the Consent Agenda should be held until the items are reached.

SALINAS YOUTH COUNCIL UPDATES AND COMMENTS
Receive a presentation from the Salinas Youth Council Members.

PRESENTATION
Councilmember comments on presentations are generally limited to three minutes.

ID#26-152 STRYVE Youth Violence Prevention Program
Recommendation: Receive presentation from Julia Muruato, Health Program Coordinator and CPTED Youth.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 - LEVINE ACT
Government Code § 84308. Parties to any proceeding involving a license, permit or other entitlement for use pending before the City Council must disclose any campaign contributions over $500 (aggregated) within the preceding 12 months made by the party, their agent, and those required to be aggregated with their contributions under Government Code § 82015.5. The disclosure must include the amount contributed and the name(s) of the contributor(s).

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
ID#26-079 Salinas Fire and Police 2026 Fireworks Enforcement Plan Recommendation: No action is required. This report is submitted to the City Council for informational purposes only, in accordance with Salinas Municipal Code Section 5-02.22.

CONSENT AGENDA
Matters listed under the Consent Agenda may be enacted by one motion unless a member of the Council requests a separate vote or discuss. Members of the public may comment on the Consent Agenda items collectively during their public comment.

ID#26-151 Minutes

Page 3 ends

3 April 7, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommendation: Approve minutes of March 24, 2026.

ID#26-125 Award of the El Gabilan Park Improvement Project No. 9246 Recommendation: Approve a Resolution approving the Plans and Specifications for the El Gabilan Park Improvements Project (CIP 9246); and awarding a contract to Stockbridge General Contracting Inc. for the El Gabilan Park Improvements Project (CIP 9246), in an amount not to exceed $773,740; and approving a construction contingency of $116,061 for a total contract not to exceed total of $889,801.

ID#26-127 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Recommendation: Approve a Resolution establishing speed limits as recommended by the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report.

ID#26-131 Delegation of Appellate Authority
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution delegating authority over appeals of Hearing Officer decisions on Fair Return Petitions filed under the Rent Stabilization Ordinance.

ID#26-133 Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration for Emergency Clean-Up and Stabilization of 37 and 39 Soledad Street
Recommendation: A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration for emergency clean-up and stabilization of 37 and 39 Soledad Street to increase the total compensation amount by $69,170 for a maximum compensation amount not to exceed $451,320.

ID#26-149 Modification to Classification - Salary Schedule and Reclassification Recommendation: Approve a Resolution modifying the Classification - Salary Schedule and recommended reclassifications to add the classification of Deputy Director of Information Technology and reclassify the incumbent Information Systems Manager; adjust the salary range for the Assistant Finance Director; add the classifications of Deputy City Attorney I and II; adjust the salary ranges for the Attorney series of classifications; add the classification of Deputy Director of Library and Community Services; reclassify (Title Change) one Public Works Division Manager to Construction Inspection Manager; reclassify (Title Change) Public Works Division Manager to Engineering Division Manager; add the classification of Construction Inspection Manager; and dd the classification of Public Safety Information Officer.

CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Receive brief oral report from the City Manager.

COUNCILMEMBERS’ REPORTS, APPOINTMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Receive communication from Councilmembers on reports, appointments and future agenda items. Councilmember comments are generally limited to three minutes.

ADJOURNMENT

Page 4 ends

4 April 7, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda - Final
_____________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk

AGENDA MATERIAL / ADDENDUM
Any addendums will be posted within 72 hours of regular meetings or 24 hours of special meetings and in accordance with Californian Government Code Section 54954.2 and 54956. City Council agenda reports and other writings distributed to the legislative body may be viewed at the Salinas City Clerk’s Office, 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, and are posted on the City’s website at www.cityofsalinas.org in accordance with California Government Code section 54597.5. The City Council may take action that is different than the proposed action reflected on the agenda.

Disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, may be requested by any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting. Language interpretation may be requested as soon as possible but by no later than 5 p.m. of the last business day prior to the meeting. Requests should be referred to the City Clerk’s Office At 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, 758-7381, as soon as possible but by no later than 5 p.m. of the last business day prior to the meeting. Hearing impaired or TTY/TDD text telephone users may contact the city by dialing 711 for the California Relay Service (CRS) or by telephoning any other service providers’ CRS telephone number.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
This agenda was posted on April 2, 2026 in the Salinas Rotunda and City's website.

Meetings are streamed live at https://salinas.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx, televised live on Comcast Channel 25 and on http://www.youtube.com/thesalinaschannel at 4:00 p.m. on the date of the regularly scheduled meeting and will be broadcast throughout the day on Friday, Saturday, Monday and Wednesday following the meeting. For the most up-to-date Broadcast Schedule for The Salinas Channel on Comcast 25, please visit or subscribe to our Google Calendar located at http://tinyurl.com/SalinasChannel25. All past City Council meetings may also be viewed on the Salinas Channel on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/thesalinaschannel.

Page 5 ends

5 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-153, Version: 1
a. Labor Negotiations - California Government Code Section §54957.6 with its designated labor representatives Rene Mendez, City Manager; Lisa G. Murphy, Assistant City Manager; Christopher A.

Callihan, City Attorney; Katherine Hogan, Assistant City Attorney; Selina Andrews, Finance Director; Marina Horta-Gallegos, Human Resources Director; Sylvia Enriquez, Human Resources Manager; and Che Johnson, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, regarding labor relations with Service Employees International Union (SEIU), SEIU Supervisors, Salinas Municipal Employees Association/SEIU, Association of Management Personnel, Police Officers Association, Police Management Association, International Association of Firefighters, Fire Supervisors Association, Confidential Non-Management Employees, Confidential Management Employees, and Department Directors.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/2/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
6 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-152, Version: 1
STRYVE Youth Violence Prevention Program
Receive presentation from Julia Muruato, Health Program Coordinator and CPTED Youth.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
7 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-079, Version: 1
Salinas Fire and Police 2026 Fireworks Enforcement Plan No action is required. This report is submitted to the City Council for informational purposes only, in accordance with Salinas Municipal Code Section 5-02.22.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
8 Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: APRIL 7, 2026
DEPARTMENT: SALINAS FIRE DEPARTMENT

SALINAS POLICE DEPARTMENT

FROM: SAMUEL KLEMEK, FIRE CHIEF

CARLOS ACOSTA, CHIEF OF POLICE

TITLE: SALINAS FIRE AND POLICE 2026 FIREWORKS

ENFORCEMENT PLAN

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

No action is required. This report is submitted to the City Council for informational purposes only, in accordance with Salinas Municipal Code Section 5-02.22.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Measure C, an initiative measure approved by the voters of Salinas in June 2016, allows for the sale and use of “Safe and Sane” fireworks within the city. One component of the measure requires the Salinas Fire Department and the Salinas Police Department to present a plan outlining public education and enforcement efforts to address illegal fireworks use during the Fourth of July holiday. The plan is multifaceted and includes education, enforcement, and response elements.

BACKGROUND:

As most f ireworks violations are considered misdemeanors under the law, it is a challenge to prosecute offenders under the rules of evidence and proof without eyewitness corroboration. To that end, our enforcement efforts will again focus on public involvement, education, and the city’s administrative citation process aid in making the sale and use of illegal fireworks “socially unacceptable”.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project . The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:

No.

9 Page | 2
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The objectives of the Salinas Police and Salinas Fire Department’s Fourth of July enforcement plan are to support the City Council’s goals and;

1. Encourage emergency preparedness and community resiliency by reducing fire, life-safety, and injury risks associated with illegal fireworks.

2. Protect public health and safety through proactive enforcement efforts that deter illegal fireworks activity and reduce nuisances in residential neighborhoods.

3. Strengthen collaboration with partner agencies by coordinating enforcement, response, and outreach efforts with the Salinas Police Department, Salinas Fire Department, other City departments, neighboring jurisdictions, regional partners, and media outlets in support of a unified Fourth of July enforcement strategy.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Fireworks enforcement is truly a Citywide effort, made possible through the shared commitment, staff time, and resources of multiple departments working toward the common goal of protecting public safety and community well-being.

The illegal fireworks enforcement task force usually consists of personnel from City Administration, Community Development, Fire, Police, Information Technologies, Library and Community Services, and Public Works.

Additionally, Public Works will assist with the installation of banners at major intersections to support public outreach and awareness efforts. Information Technology will assist with communication tools , hot spots, and operational support with a live call center . The Public Information Office will coordinate enforcement messaging with local media outlets. The City Attorney’s Office and the Finance Department will also be active partners, each contributing in their respective areas.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Costs to cover the 2026 emergency response and enforcement efforts for illegal fireworks will be paid through the 7% surcharge recovered from the sale of Safe-n-Sane fireworks. Additional costs beyond what is collected by the surcharge will be paid for by the General Fund.

Fund

General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger
Account Name

Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount
Requested
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

10 Page | 3

ATTACHMENTS:

Enforcement Plan PowerPoint
SPD Ops Plan
11 SPECIAL EVENT OPERATIONS ORDERS
4th of July Fireworks enforcement
Saturday, July 4th, 2026
1500 – 0100 hours

SALINAS POLICE DEPARTMENT MISSION

The mission of this event is to ensure public safety and maintain order, with special attention given to potential issues involving individuals under the influence of alcohol.

The goal of the Salinas Police Department is to provide a safe environment for both the event and the community members in attendance. The Salinas Police Department will also work to ensure that traffic surrounding the event is not adversely impacted and that any calls for service related to the event are promptly addressed.

EVENT DESCRIPTION

As we approach July 4th, calls reporting illegal fireworks will begin to increase. As a result, several brush fires occur and homes catch fire in Salinas. While we may not be able to prevent every incident, it’s critical that we address violations whenever possible.

Please note that some of the codes have recently changed and below is a quick guide to fireworks enforcement.

The most effective method we have to deter the use of illegal fireworks is Salinas City Code 5-02.19 (SCC). This section allows for an administrative citation to be issued to the property owner where illegal activity is taking place. If you observe aerial fireworks coming from a specific backyard or location, be sure to enter the address you suspect into CAD. Document your observations as thoroughly as possible, complete a report under 5-

02.19 SCC, and forward it to the City of Salinas Fire Prevention Division. Fire Prevention staff will issue the administrative citations to the property owners after July 4th. Additionally, while making direct contact with the suspected residents can be helpful, it is not required under this section. If feasible, make contact, obtain statements, collect any additional illegal fireworks, and photograph any debris or remains from what was launched.
12 If you observe someone in possession of illegal fireworks, use section 5-02.03 SCC General Prohibition Against Possession, Use, or Sale of Fireworks in conjunction with 5-

02.19 SCC Administrative Fines and Penalties. Section 5-02.03 establishes that any violation of this chapter is a misdemeanor. Under Section 5-02.19, dangerous fireworks cases involving possession, use, sale, or display carries an administrative fine of not less than $1,250 per offense.

While applicable Health and Safety (H&S) code sections may also be used, SCC sections are preferred. To determine whether fireworks are illegal (and not “safe and sane”), look for the State of California registration seal on the packaging; legal “safe and sane” fireworks will display this seal, as shown on the attached California Department of Forestry H&S Code reference sheet.

In most cases, photograph the confiscated fireworks, place them in the storage locker located outside Fire Station #1 (no evidence tag required), and contact the on-duty Battalion Chief for access. In more serious cases involving large quantities or suspected illegal sales, complete an evidence tag and book the items into the designated evidence locker at Fire Station #1 as retained property.

If you seize fireworks, issue a citation, or submit a report to Fire Prevention for an administrative citation, please be sure to document the incident on the stat sheet located on the Watch Commander’s desk so we can accurately track our activity and enforcement numbers.

SITUATION

Overview of Unit Assignments

This year, the 4th of July falls on a Saturday, and an increase in illegal fireworks use is anticipated as day gets closer.

The number of officers and sergeants assigned to fireworks enforcement is still to be determined. Sergeants will have access to all fireworks-related crime tips as they are logged by fire personnel and will assign cases to officers for investigation as needed.

Enforcement actions will be taken whenever possible. Depending on the situation, officers may issue citations, make arrests, and/or take administrative action. For administrative actions, a report will be completed and forwarded to the Fire Department for follow-up. Confiscated fireworks will be disposed of at a location designated by the Fire Department.

Drone units will respond to fireworks reports and will proactively monitor areas for illegal activity. Unless public safety is at risk or other criminal activity is observed, direct contact with individuals discharging illegal fireworks is not required. Violations and their locations will be documented, and footage will be uploaded according to policy. Each recording will be labeled with a citation number provided by the Salinas Fire Department, and citations will subsequently be mailed by the Fire Prevention staff.

13 EXECUTION OF THE MISSION

Event Briefing

Salinas Police Department and Salinas Fire Department will conduct a briefing at Fire Station 1 at 1700 hrs.

COMMUNICATIONS

Dispatch

All communications for this event will take place on SPD Channel TBD.

Radio Designators

All Salinas Police Department personnel will be assigned a radio call sign. Those personnel with designated unit call signs (ie: Traffic / Detectives / Reserve Officers) will use their assigned unit call sign. All others will be given a “Frank” unit call sign. Call sign numbers will begin with #10 and increase until all officers have a radio call sign assigned to them.

Chain of Command

All Sworn Officers will report directly to the assigned supervisors for the event (refer to assignment sheet). The Sergeant will personally notify each on duty Watch Commander of the event, along with providing a personnel roster with radio designators. A copy of the Operations Orders will be provided to the on duty Watch Commander.

14 FIREWORKS

ENFORCEMENT PLAN
Samuel Klemek, Fire Chief
Carlos Acosta, Chief of Police
April 07, 2026
15 Augmented police and fire staff will perform citywide patrols.

Gather evidence for administrative citations (video,
photos).

Continue efforts to change the social conscience of
illegal fireworks use.
16 “Zero Tolerance” signage will be posted on all fireworks stands.

Printed Fireworks Safety materials will be distributed to schools and fireworks stands.

Fireworks Safety and Enforcement signage placed
throughout the City starting June 1st
17 Promotion of the City of Salinas Fireworks website
www.salinasfireworks.com
and Salinas Connect App
Press releases and interviews with local news outlets
to spread the word about fireworks safety and the
penalties for use of illegal fireworks.

Collaboration with City of Salinas PIO and Mag One
Media to continue our social media campaign
18 Roaming marked and unmarked patrols units will be
deployed throughout the city during the holiday period.

SFD and SPD Drone Teams will be deployed strategically
throughout the city.

Additional Fire Department resources will be deployed
for emergency responses and to assist with “observing
and reporting” the use of illegal fireworks.
19 The Salinas Fire Prevention Division will review reports and issue administrative citations via mail.

Administrative citations will be issued to property
owners where illegal fireworks are discharged.

OSHA regulations prohibit staff from handling and
storage of fireworks. Disposal must be done by
licensed hazardous materials handlers.
20 Costs to cover the 2026 emergency response and
enforcement efforts for illegal fireworks will be paid
through the 7% surcharge recovered from sale of Safe
and Sane Fireworks Stands.

Combined fund balances for 2025 fireworks related
revenue are approximately $ 68,000.
21 22
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-151, Version: 1
Minutes
Approve minutes of March 24, 2026.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/2/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
23 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-125, Version: 1
Award of the El Gabilan Park Improvement Project No. 9246 Approve a Resolution approving the Plans and Specifications for the El Gabilan Park Improvements Project (CIP 9246); and awarding a contract to Stockbridge General Contracting Inc. for the El Gabilan Park Improvements Project (CIP 9246), in an amount not to exceed $773,740; and approving a construction contingency of $116,061 for a total contract not to exceed total of $889,801.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/2/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
24 Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: APRIL 7, 2026
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PE, LS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

KRISTAN LUNDQUIST, LCS DIRECTOR

LISA BRINTON, COMMUNITY DEVELPMENT DIRECTOR
THROUGH: ADRIANA ROBLES, P.E., C.F.M., CITY ENGINEER

GRANT LEONARD, PLANNING MANAGER
BY: PHAVANA ARAMKUL, JUNIOR ENGINEER

OSCAR RESENDIZ, SENIOR PLANNER
TITLE: AWARD OF THE EL GABILAN PARK IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT, NO. 9246
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution:

1. Approving the Plans and Specifications for the El Gabilan Park Improvements Project (CIP 9246); and

2. Awarding a contract to Stockbridge General Contracting Inc . for the El Gabilan Park Improvements Project (CIP 9246), in an amount not to exceed $773,740; and

3. Approving a construction contingency of $116,061 for a total contract not to exceed total of $889,801.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On March 6, 2026, six bid proposals were received from Stockbridge General Contracting Inc. , Granite Rock Company, Don Chapin Co., Inc., JPB Designs Inc., Azul Works, Inc. , and Premier Builders Inc . for the El Gabilan Park Improvements . The apparently lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Stockbridge General Contracting Inc ., submitted a bid in the amount of $773,740. City staff recommend awarding the project to Stockbridge General Contracting Inc. in the bid amount of $773,740 and approving an allowance of 15% construction contingencies in an amount of $116,061.

BACKGROUND:

In 2019, the City of Salinas completed the Parks, Recreation, and Library Services Master Plan (“Master Plan ). The development of this Master Plan was led by a steering committee of stakeholders, residents, and organizational leaders and involved extensive public engagement in the planning process. 98% of City residents answering a survey felt that public parks, recreational 25 Page | 2
opportunities, and library services are important or essential to the quality of life in Salinas; more than half (57%) rated the parks and recreation system as “fair” or “poor.” City parks and open spaces were the focus of one of the four Open House sessions, with participants placing high priorities on safety and maintenance, trails for walking and biking, water play, dog parks, and family/social gatherings.

More than 80% of community survey respondents during the Master Plan process considered upgrading existing parks a high or top priority. One respondent responded, “Before expanding, please start by improving what we already have. Our parks are a treasure, but they need A LOT of love and improvements.”
Following the recommendations of the Master Plan and development of the Capital Improvement Plan for Park and Facility Projects, staff has worked diligently to secure funding sources to improve the condition of existing parks.

In November 2019, the City Council unanimously accepted the Alisal Vibrancy Plan (AVP) as a strategic planning document. The AVP is an action-oriented, comprehensive strategy for Salinas’ Alisal (East Salinas) neighborhoods. The Plan’s purpose is to communicate the collective vision, goals, and desires of those who live, work, worship, and shop in the Alisal area. The AVP Implementation Plan, developed in collaboration with the AVP Implementation Committee, prioritizes short-term activities to improve the cleanliness, appearance, infrastructure, parks and open space, and to promote economic development of the Alisa l area. One of the projects under the parks and open space bucket is to resurface existing asphalt pavement and incorporation of a new half basketball court and/or other playground games (i.e., hopscotch, four -square, etc.) at El Gabilan Tot-Lot; AVP Implementation Funds (CIP 9246) will cover all the cost associated with the El Gabilan Tot-Lot project.

On December 13, 2022, the Council authorized the City Manager to enter into an Agreement for Professional Services (Agreement) between the City of Salinas and BFS Landscape Architects in an amount not to exceed $1,755,389 for the design, program and construction management for Closter Park, El Gabilan Play Lot, and two universal playgrounds (one at Northgate Park and one at Williams Ranch Park). Since 2022, staff have worked with BFS and the community to develop the final design for El Gabilan Park. Community Development staff conducted a survey for outreach and input for the final design from the residents within the El Gabilan Park vicinity and created 500 door hangers with QR code for more direct input from the El Gabilan Park neighborhood. Library and Community Service completed Site Plan Review and permitting process with Current Planning and Permit services divisions.

City Engineer approved the project plans and specifications and authorized the call to bids for this project with bid submittal date of March 6, 2026.

On March 6, 2026, bid proposals were received by the City, publicly opened and read via a Zoom meeting with the results shown on Table 1.

26 Page | 3
Table 1. El Gabilan Park Improvements Bid Results

CONTRACTOR BASE BID
Stockbridge General Contracting Inc. $773,740.00
Granite Rock Company $869,375.00
Don Chapin Co., Inc. $933,685.00
JPB Designs Inc. $950,000.00
Azul Works, Inc. $1,024,000.00
Premier Builders Inc $1,227,235.00
ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE $755,427.00
Stockbridge General Contracting Inc., the apparent low bidder with a bid approximately 2%, above the engineer’s estimate.

Anticipated costs are detailed in Table 2 below.

Table 2. Anticipated Costs
Description Anticipated Expenditure
Base Bid $773,740
Contingency (15%) $116,061
Direct Project Cost Subtotal $889,801

Administrative Overhead $50,000
City Staff Project Management and
Admin.(8.5%)
$65,768
Art Charge (1%) $7,737
QA/Specialty Testing $20,000
Sof Project Costs Subtotal $143,505

TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $1,033,306
Based on the proposals received, staff recommend awarding the project to the apparent lowest responsive, and responsible bidder, Stockbridge General Contracting Inc ., in an amount not to exceed $773,740. Staff recommends allocating a 15% construction contingency in the amount of $116,061. Direct total project costs are estimated at $889,801.

Construction is anticipated to begin in the summer of 2026.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The El Gabilan Park Improvements project which includes demolishing and replacing existing structures of substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity, qualifies as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption (Section 153 32(b) improvements) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
27 Page | 4
No, because this project was subject to competitive bidding.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This project addresses the current City Council’s Goals of Youth and Seniors, Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, Economic Development and Public Safety.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Public Works Department is collaborating with Library Community Services Department and Community Development Department for the construction of this project a nd with Legal and Finance Department during the purchasing process.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Based on the table, sufficient funds are available to proceed with the construction for this project.

Fund

Appropriation

Appropriation
Name
Total
Appropriation
Amount for
recommendation
FY 25-26
Operating
Budget Page
Last Budget
Action (Date,
Resolution)*
1200 30.9246-66.4000 Capital Outlays
Improvements $1,506,563.92 $889,801
CIP;
Community
Development
Resolution No.
22685, June 13,
2023
1200 30.9246-61.1100 Salaries & Benefits
Regular Pay $65,768
CIP;
Community
Development
Resolution No.
22685, June 13,
2023
1200 30.9246-63.5010
Outside Services
Professional
Services
$88,770.50 $20,000
CIP;
Community
Development
Resolution No.
22685, June 13,
2023
1200 30.9246-64.1005 Other Charges
Public Art Charge $16,271.18 $7,737
CIP;
Community
Development
Resolution No.
22685, June 13,
2023
1200 30.9246-64.1000
Other Charges
Administrative
Overhead
$66,204.65 $50,000
CIP;
Community
Development
Resolution No.
22685, June 13,
2023

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Bid Tab
28 RESOLUTION NO.____________(N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE EL GABILAN PARK IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT, NO. 9246 TO STOCKBRIDGE GENERAL CONTRACTING INC.

WHEREAS, on July 2, 201 9, per Resolution No. 21649, city council adopted the Parks, Recreation, and Library Services Master Plan (“Master Plan” ) 20-year Capital Improvements Plan for Park and Facility Projects, identified and ranked “El Gabilan Play Lot”, El Gabilan Park, #35 in terms of needing improvement; and
WHEREAS, In Novemb er 2019, the City Council accepted the Alisal Vibrancy Plan (AVP) as a strategic planning document; and
WHEREAS, the AVP Implementation Plan, developed in collaboration with the AVP Implementation Committee, prioritizes short -term activities to improve pa rks and open space in the Alisal; and
WHEREAS, one of the projects under the parks and open space category of the AVP are improvements at the El Gabilan Tot-Lot; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022, the Council authorized a Professional Services Agreement with BFS Landscape Architects for the design, program and construction management for Closter Park, El Gabilan Play Lot, and two universal playgrounds (at Northgate Park and Williams Ranch Park); and
WHEREAS, AVP Implementation Funds (CIP 9246) will cover all the cost associated with the El Gabilan Tot-Lot project; and
WHEREAS, On February 6, 2026, City engineer approved the project plans and specifications and authorized the call to bids for this project with bid submittal date on March 6, 2026; and
WHEREAS, representatives of the Public Works Department on March 6, 2026 , at a public meeting held via Zoom meetin g from City Hall, at Salinas, California, publicly opened, and read all bids or proposals delivered electronically via the PlanetBids website for the El Gabilan Park Improvement s Project, No. 9246 in accordance with the specifications for such work; and
WHEREAS, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder , Stockbridge General Contracting Inc., submitted a bid that is 2% above the Engineer’s Estimate; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available to award this project; and WHEREAS, City staff thereupon reported the results of the bidding to the City Council at its regular meeting on April 7, 202 6, and the City Council in open session at said meeting examined the report of staff.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED pursuant to Salinas Mu nicipal Code Section 12-21, in reference to the “ El Gabilan Park Improvement Project No. 9246 ”, that all of 29 said bids or proposals are rejected except the bid from Stockbridge General Contracting Inc. , (hereinafter referred to as “The Successful Bidders”), being the lowest and best bid which is hereby accepted. The subject contract is hereby awarded to said Successful Bidder for the sum of $773,740 and more specifically at the prices set forth and contained in the Proposal for the “ El Gabilan Park Improveme nt Project No. 9246 ”, of said Successful Bidders , filed in the office of the City Clerk. Said sum shall be paid by the City of Salinas to said Successful Bidder , payable at the time and manner specified in the plans and specifications and contract document s for the project, entitled, “El Gabilan Park Improvement Project No. 9246”; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said plans and specifications are hereby accepted and adopted for said work and are also referred to for all of the details and particulars thereof, and said plans and specifications are by reference incorporated in and hereby made a part of this resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of Salinas is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the City of Salinas to execute a contract consistent with the Proposal of said Successful Bidder for said work; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves a construction contingency of $116,061, for a total contract amount not to exceed total of $889,801.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of April 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

______________________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Patricia M. Soratos CMC, City Clerk
30 BID OPENING:

Mar. 6, 2026

BID TABULATION

EL GABILAN PARK IMPROVEMENTS
CIP No. 9246
Bid awarded on _________ by Salinas City Council by Resolution No. _______ (NCS) to: ________________ Drawing No. for for the sum of ________________ (BASE BID, items 1 & 2) Project Coordinator: Phavana Aramkul All other bids were rejected and bid bonds returned. Project Manager: Kristan Lundquist Dated this ______ day of _________, 2026
City Clerk
ITEM
CODE
BASE BID – EL GABILAN PARK IMPROVEMENTS CIP No. 9246
1 Coordination and Mobilization; Complete-in-Place 1 LS 20,000$ 20,000$ 39,000.00$ 39,000.00$ 39,500.00$ 39,500.00$ 13,842.00$ 13,842.00$ 140,000.00$ 140,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 2 SITE WORK: Improvements to include, but not limited to Site preparation and erosion control, for replacing existing basketball court with a new multi-sport court, surfacing and striping, fencing, and paving areas, misc. landscape renovations, new site furnishings, new security lighting, replenishing the existing playground surface, new sidewalk; Concrete monument sign; and 60-DAY Plant establishment period; Complete-In-Place 1 LS 735,427$ 735,427$ 734,740.00$ 734,740.00$ 829,875.00$ 829,875.00$ 919,843.00$ 919,843.00$ 810,000.00$ 810,000.00$ 824,000.00$ 824,000.00$ 1,207,235.00$ 1,207,235.00$ 1 Local Purchasing Discount
(FOR COMPARISON ONLY)
1 2

2.1 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 X X X X
CONTRACTOR #1
DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL APPROX. QTY
Bidder's Statement Of Subcontractors Part II
Non-Collusion Declaration Of Sub-Contractor
Bidder's Statement of Good Faith Effort for Local Hire
Bidder’s List for the City of Salinas Public Works Department

ITEMS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PROPOSAL ON BID OPENING DATE Insurance Certification
N/A
X
Declaration of Local Business Enterprise (if applicable) Addendum No. 2
ITEMS TO BE SUBMITTED BY LOW BIDDER AND SECOND LOWEST BIDDDER ON/OR WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS AFTER BID OPENING DATE Bidder's Statement Of Subcontractors Part I
Bid Bond
Bidder’s Statement of Financial Responsibility Technical Ability and Experience ITEM
NO. UNIT PRICE
5%
755,427$ GRAND TOTAL BASE BID Items 1- 2 TOTAL ( BASE BID Items 1- 2)
(For Comparison Only)
Proposal
Addendum No. 1
755,427$
Non-Collusion Declaration Of Contractor X
X

ENGINEERING ESTIMATE
Stockbridge General Contracting Inc.
2972 Larkin Ave Clovis CA 93612
TOTAL
773,740.00$
773,740.00$
X
X
X
X
X
X

UNIT PRICE
X
X
X
N/A
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
N/A
CONTRACTOR #3
Don Chapin Co., Inc.
560 Crazy Horse Canyon Road
Salinas Ca 93907

UNIT PRICE TOTAL
933,685.00$
46,684.25$
887,000.75$
X
X
CONTRACTOR #2
Granite Rock Company
5225 Hellyer Avenue, Suite 220 San
Jose CA 95138

UNIT PRICE TOTAL
869,375.00$
43,468.75$
825,906.25$
X
X
1,024,000.00$
N/A
1,024,000.00$
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CONTRACTOR #4
JPB Designs Inc
5650 Main Ave Suite 2 Orangevale
CA 95662

UNIT PRICE TOTAL
950,000.00$
N/A
950,000.00$
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
N/A
CONTRACTOR #5
Azul Works, Inc.
1400 Egbert Avenue San Francisco
CA 94124

UNIT PRICE TOTAL
Premier Builders Inc
5780 Obata Way Gilroy CA 95020
CONTRACTOR #6
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
N/A

UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1,227,235.00$
N/A
1,227,235.00$
3/20/2026 J:\p\9246 El Gabilan Park Improvements\BID Operations\BID Opening\BID_TAB_9246.xlsx Page 1 of 1 31 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-127, Version: 1
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Approve a Resolution establishing speed limits as recommended by the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/2/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
32 Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: APRIL 7, 2026
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PE, LS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: ADRIANA ROBLES, PE, CFM, CITY ENGINEER

JONATHAN HERNANDEZ, JUNIOR ENGINEER
TITLE: 2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED
LIMITS

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution establish ing speed limits as recommended by the 202 6 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

In California, an Engineering and Traffic Survey (“E&TS”) is the tool used to establish a speed limit, surveys are updated every 5-7 years and may be extended up to 14 years. Normally the speed limit is set at the closest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed calculated through the E&TS, but a single 5 mph reduction is permitted based on roadway conditions and constraints.

Speed limits set further below this practice create a “speed trap” that may result in the removal of the ability for law enforcement to enforce the roadway with radar per the California Vehicle Code (CVC 40802). This practice changed in July 2024 based on California Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43) allowing speed limit establishment to also consider “vulnerable roadway users” and “safety corridors”.

A key speed survey expired in January 2026, staff is presenting a new E&TS for Council consideration. Approval of this survey is required to allow law enforcement to continue using radar on this road segment.

BACKGROUND:

The routine analysis and establishment of speed limits on roadways ensures compliance with the Uniform Vehicle Code (UVC”) established by the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances.

Engineering & Traffic Survey (Speed Survey) Process

In California the use of Speed Surveys is defined by the California Vehicle Code (“CVC”) and the methodology is defined by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (“MUTCD”). To set a speed limit, staff use a standard “85th percentile” survey outlined in the MUTCD. These surveys measure how fast people naturally drive during normal traffic, then set the limit to closest 5-mph mark of the speed used by 85% of those drivers. A further 5-mph reduction is permitted based on 33 Page | 2
roadway conditions and constraints. Under CVC 40802, a “speed trap” is created if a speed survey is missing or if the limit is set lower than the 8 5th percentile. In these cases, police are legally prohibited from using radar to issue tickets on that road.

For example, a roadway segment with a measured 85th percentile speed of 37 mph may have a recommended speed limit of 35 mph. Per the CVC, a 5-mph reduction to 30 mph is justified when geometric constraints (horizontal or vertical curves) limit sight distance. Similarly, the limit may be reduced to account for high pedestrian and bicycle volumes associated with designed school routes or identified bicyc le networks. Prior to Assembly Bill 43, if this same roadway segment were signed at 25 mph it would have be considered a “speed trap” and radar enforcement would not be permitted.

California Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43) signed in 2021, gives local agencies more power to set speed limits based on safety goals rather than just the “speed trap” rules. If a required traffic survey shows a limit is still unsafe, an agency can reduce the speed limit by an additional 5 mph in two cases: designation of a safety corridor or if the road is adjacent to a high-activity area, specifically a facility that may attract more vulnerable groups like children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities and the unhoused. Based on the MUTCD, a “safety corridor” is officially defined as a segment within the top 20% of the city’s network for crashes, or any road where these vulnerable groups are present within 1320 feet (1/4 mile).

Salinas Engineering & Traffic Surveys

Following recent speed surveys, staff recommend reducing the speed limit for one specific road segment: Williams Road.

The Salinas Vision Zero Action Plan identified Williams Road as the City’s second highest collision corridor. While the measured 85th percentile speed on Williams Road is 37 mph, standard speed survey procedures allow for the speed limit adjustment based on safety. By rounding the measured speed to the nearest 5 -mph increment (35 mph) and also applying a 5 -mph safety reduction, staff recommend a new speed limit of 30 mph. See Table 1: 2026 Speed Su rvey Study Findings.

Table 1: 2026 Speed Survey Study Findings

Street Segment Speed Survey Study Limits Posted Speed Limit AB43 Study Methodology
Used Existing Proposed
Williams Road East Alisal Street to East Boronda Road 35 30 No

Why not keep the existing speed limit signs arbitrarily low to slow the speed of traffic? California law prohibits the arbitrary posting of reduced speed limits. Doing so can create a “speed trap,” which legally restricts law enforcement from using radar and often lea ds to higher overall vehicle speeds. However, AB 43 provides new flexibility. It allows the City Council to establish safety corridors and reduce speed limits for the benefit of vulnerable road users, provided an additional study confirms that a lower limit is necessary for safety.

34 Page | 3
Traffic and Transportation Commission
The recommendation for the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits was presented to the Traffic and Transportation Commission at its March 12 , 20 26, meeting. The Commission voted ( 5-0) to recommend City Council approve a Resolution to establish the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project . The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:

No.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The establishment of legitimate speed limits support the City Council's goal of “Public Safety”.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Public Works Department staff survey, recommend, monitor, and install posted speed limits.

Established speed zones allow the Salinas Police Department to enforce posted speed limits. Public Works provides the Police Department and the Traffic Court with updates and changes to the established speed limits for proper enforcement.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Installation and replacement of speed limits signs is estimated at approximately $2,000. Sufficient budget is available and appropriated in the City Street Sign Retro Reflectivity Project (CIP 9162).

Fund

General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name

Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
35 Page | 4
Attachment 1: 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report Attachment 2: FHWA Functional Classification Maps
Attachment 3: Speed Limit Informational Brochure

36 1

RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMITS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE 2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR

SPEED LIMITS

WHEREAS, in accordance with California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358, local municipalities have the power to increase or decrease prima facie speed limits for local streets; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 40802 and provisions of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Engineering and Traffic Surveys must be performed on those local streets every five to seven years when the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects are utilized to enforce the prima facie speed limits for those streets; and

WHEREAS, existing law defines a speed trap and prohibits evidence of a driver’s speed obtained through a speed trap from being admissible in court in any prosecution against a driver for a speed-related offense; and

WHEREAS, existing law deems a road where the speed limit is not justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted within the previous 5 to 7 years to be a speed trap, unless the roadway has been evaluated by a registered engineer in which case the speed limit remains enforceable for a period of 14 years. Existing law exempts a school zone from certain provisions relating to defining a speed trap; and

WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2024, the State of California, through Assembly Bill 43, granted local jurisdictions the authority to retain or reduce speed limits a maximum of 5 mph below the current posted speed limit without creating a speed trap following an Engineering and Traffic Survey evaluated by a registered engineer; and

WHEREAS, the results of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits conform to the requirements of the California Vehicle Code; and

WHEREAS, City staff has concluded those speed limits set forth in the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits attached hereto are justified for their associated street segments in that they are found to be most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and are reasonable and safe for those street segments; and

WHEREAS, at its March 12, 2026, meeting, the Traffic and Transportation Commission voted to recommend to City Council the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits; and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1). The proposed action has no potential 37 2

to cause any effect on the environment and does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City staff is hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits to fully effectuate the intent of this Resolution.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

________________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk
38 City of Salinas PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • 200 Lincoln Ave • Salinas, California 9 3 9 0 1 (831) 758-7241 • (831) 758-7935 (Fax) •www.salinas.gov

2026
Engineering and Traffic Survey
For Speed Limits
Technical Report

PREPARED BY:

City of Salinas
Public Works Department
Traffic and Transportation Division
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, CA 93901
39 CERTIFICATION

I, Adriana Robles, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Salinas was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am experienced in performing surveys of this type and duly registered in the State of California as professional Civil Engineer.

Adriana Robles, PE, CFM
City Engineer

40 INTRODUCTION:

The 2026 Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) in the City of Salinas fulfills California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 22357 and 22358, which require local agencies to follow certain procedures established by the State of California. The E&TS are intended to serve as the basis for establishing and enforcing the speed limits for specific streets in the City. The work herein by the City Traffic and Transportation Engineering Division staff, in accordance with the California CVC Section 40802, reviews the established speed limit sections to determine whether changes in existing conditions have occurred which may require adjusting the posted speed limit.

Engineering and Traffic Surveys for speed limits are regularly conducted once every five (5) years by governing municipalities for the purpose of complying with Section 40802 of the CVC and the national Uniform Vehicle Code. E&TS may be extended to every seven (7) years if the arresting officer has completed device training and the device has been recently calibrated. E&TS may be extended every fourteen (14) years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or surrounding land uses have occurred as specified in the CVC. An E&TS should be conducted on new roadways or where traffic conditions have changed significantly.

The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), as required under CVC 21400, defines standards for posting speed limits that rely upon collecting speed data in the field to determine the 85th percentile speed, which is subsequently rounded upward or downward to the nearest 5 mile per hour increment. The CA-MUTCD allows for options to further reduce the speed limit. Additionally, local authorities are allowed to further reduce speed limits to consider the safety of vulnerable pedestrians under Assembly Bill No. 43. Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary summarizes the findings and recommendations for speed limits on those segments. The results of the E&TS will be valid until 2030, see Table 1 for details, unless extended through additional criteria.

METHODOLOGY:

On January 1, 2012, CVC 21400(b) became effective requiring the California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to revise the CA-MUTCD so that speed limits are based on field-collected speed data. A spot speed survey that typically consists of measuring vehicle speeds with an electronic device, most commonly a radar speed detector. Traffic traveling at free-flow speeds in each direction for a two-way street is collected and compiled to create a data set. The most significant data point collected is the 85th percentile speed, which is the speed at or below which 85 percent of motor vehicles travel. The 85th percentile speed is the industry standard data point which typically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. The reason that speed limit areas are established and posted is to guard reasonable drivers from the unreasonable behavior of a reckless or otherwise dangerous drivers. As with other laws, speed limits are established based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive a section of roadway as to what speed is reasonable and safe.

As specified in the California MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit “shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.” Additionally, the MUTCD allows the posted speed limit to be lowered by no more than 5 mph from a rounded speed, using one of two options that depend on whether the 85th percentile speed has been rounded down or up. The options may be applied as follows:

1. MUTCD Section 2B.13 states, “The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.” The cited CVC Section 627 defines an E&T survey that is required to consider prevailing speeds, accident records, and conditions not readily apparent to the driver, and optionally consider residential density as well as pedestrian and bicycle safety. According to the MUTCD, this option requires documentation of an E&T Survey that “shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.” The basis for a speed limit that is more than 5 mph lower than the 85th percentile speed is something other than prevailing speeds. In regard to conditions not readily apparent to the driver, CVC 22358 states that “physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning.” 41 2. MUTCD Section 2B.13 12a also states “For cases in which the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5-mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.” An Option 2 round-down, which became available when CVC Section 21400(b) went into effect January 1, 2012, requires no E&T Survey to post the speed limit sign. The E&T Survey is required nevertheless, however, to allow radar or similar devices to be used for enforcement.

Neither the Vehicle Code nor the MUTCD provide much specific guidance regarding accident data or pedestrian or bicycle safety. In contrast, CVC 627(c)(1) provides specific guidance on residential density. Many residential neighborhoods in Salinas meet the density threshold of 16 separate dwelling houses or business structures per quarter mile. The statute does not apply to roads within a business district.

While the California MUTCD allows two options for lowering the posted speed, it has no provision for raising the speed limit above the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed.

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS:

The result of the Engineering and Traffic Survey for one (1) roadway section is listed in Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary: ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS EXPIRING 2030:

Reduced
75) Williams Road between East Alisal Street and East Boronda Road - This segment of Williams Road is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes, retail, and school use. Speed data collected on December 10, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 37 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 28 mph to 37 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be reduced to 30 mph.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Engineering and Traffic Surveys contained in Appendix A of this report are intended to establish and justify posted speed limits that can be enforced by radar. The posted speed limits advise the motorist and enforcement agencies of speeds considered reasonable for a particular section of highway for prevailing conditions. The posted speed limits are not absolute maximums, but rather prima facie speed limits for which violations would be cited under the Basic Speed Law (Section 22350 of the CVC). CVC 22350 states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe, having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit merely suggests a safe speed under normal conditions.
42 Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary

No. Street Segment
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
85th-Percentile Speed (mph) MUTCD
Applied
Reduction
Option
Survey
Expiration Measured Rounded Recom-
mended
75 Williams Road East Alisal Street to East Boronda Road 35 37 35 30 1 12/10/2030

43 COLLISION HISTORY

The Engineering and Traffic Survey forms summarize the available collision information for each of the street segments.

The collision information was obtained from the City of Salinas from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024. For this analysis, only collisions during the 2-year period between January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 were considered. The collisions were reviewed and only corridor related collisions, those not related to signalized intersections, were summarized for each segment. Based on the number of total collisions studied over the 2-year period and average daily traffic (ADT) counts, a collision rate was calculated for each segment. The collision rates for each segment were compared to the statewide average rate listed in the 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways, to provide a general comparison of the collision rates on the segments to expected collisions rates for similar types of roadways, shown in Table 2: Collision Rate Summary.

Lane Type Total Statewide Urban Collision Rate
(2021, 2022, 2023)
(Total per million vehicle miles)
2 and 3 lane 1.03
4+ lanes (undivided) 1.27
4+ lanes (divided) 0.97

44 Table 2: Collision Rate Summary

No. Street Segment Existing Facility Length
(mi) AADT
Collisions
(2 years)
(2023-2024)
Collision
Rate
(Acc./MVM)
Statewide
Collision
Rate
(Acc./MVM)
75 Williams Road East Alisal Street to East Boronda Road 4+ lanes (undivided) 1.99 12,840 41 2.20 1.27 45 APPENDIX A

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS

46 CITY OF SALINASTRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERINGTRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOLDistanceVertical AlignmentStreet WidthNo. Lanes and MedianTraffic Volume (Date)Accident Data (2 years)Street Segment Collision Rate= (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles) Approximately 10,250 FeetFlatVaries (56 to 78 Feet)4-Lane Major Arterial12,840 (2025)41 Collisions (2023-2024)2.20 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone85th Percentile Speed30 MPH37 MPH
AREA
COMMENTS:

STREET:BETWEEN:SURVEY DATE:WILLIAMS ROADE ALISAL ST & E BORONDA RD12/10/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030)75 This segment of Williams Road is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes,retail, and school use. Speed data collected on December 10, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 37 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 28 mph to37 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds roundeddown and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be reduced to 30 mph.DESCRIPTION

SPEED LIMIT SIGNSIGNALCITY LIMITSSCHOOL CROSSWALKCROSSWALK

ALL-WAY STOPSTOP

WILLIAMS RD

REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CIVILNO. 69142ADRIANA ROBLES
I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(75) Williams Rd btwn Alisal & Boronda.dwgE ALISAL STQUILLA STE MARKET ST

E LAUREL DRFAIRHAVEN STGRANDHAVEN STBELLEHAVEN STGARNER AVEBARDIN WYWIREN STDEL MONTE AVE

FREEDOM PKWY

E BORONDA RD
25 MPHSCHOOL ZONE25 MPHSCHOOL ZONE
47 Direction: EBD
35 MPH
Day:

Hours: From: To:

MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 1 2.00% 2.00%
24 0 0.00% 2.00%
25 0 0.00% 2.00%
26 1 2.00% 4.00%
27 0 0.00% 4.00%
28 2 4.00% 8.00%
29 5 10.00% 18.00%
30 1 2.00% 20.00%
31 3 6.00% 26.00%
32 8 16.00% 42.00%
33 5 10.00% 52.00%
34 4 8.00% 60.00%
35 7 14.00% 74.00%
36 1 2.00% 76.00%
37 5 10.00% 86.00%
38 2 4.00% 90.00%
39 1 2.00% 92.00%
40 0 0.00% 92.00%
41 1 2.00% 94.00%
42 0 0.00% 94.00%
43 1 2.00% 96.00%
44 1 2.00% 98.00%
45 0 0.00% 98.00%
46 1 2.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &

ENGINEERING SERVICES

RADAR SURVEY

4.4 0.3856

82.0%
43 37
Standard Deviation:

No. 75
38 33.7

19.28 Variance of the Mean:

Speed Limit:

Date:

CITY OF SALINAS
41 33
Vehicles in Pace:
02:53 pm
East Alisal Street & East Boronda Road
254 Williams Road
12/10/25
Street:

Between:

Survey Location:

Data Analysis:

Sunny

0.6 10 MPH Pace:

Weather:

Observer(s):

Time Mean Speed:

Sample Variance:

Rodolfo C/Enrique S
Comments:Williams Road
02:36 pm
Wednesday
Standard Error of the Mean:

Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
48 Direction: WBD
35 MPH
Day:

Hours: From: To:

MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 1 2.00% 2.00%
27 3 6.00% 8.00%
28 2 4.00% 12.00%
29 2 4.00% 16.00%
30 4 8.00% 24.00%
31 1 2.00% 26.00%
32 4 8.00% 34.00%
33 2 4.00% 38.00%
34 5 10.00% 48.00%
35 9 18.00% 66.00%
36 5 10.00% 76.00%
37 5 10.00% 86.00%
38 2 4.00% 90.00%
39 0 0.00% 90.00%
40 0 0.00% 90.00%
41 2 4.00% 94.00%
42 1 2.00% 96.00%
43 0 0.00% 96.00%
44 1 2.00% 98.00%
45 0 0.00% 98.00%
46 0 0.00% 98.00%
47 0 0.00% 98.00%
48 0 0.00% 98.00%
49 0 0.00% 98.00%
50 0 0.00% 98.00%
51 0 0.00% 98.00%
52 1 2.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &

ENGINEERING SERVICES

RADAR SURVEY

CITY OF SALINAS
Williams RoadStreet: Comments:

Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C/Enrique S
Between: East Alisal Street & East Boronda Road
Survey Location: 254 Williams Road
Speed Limit:

Date: 12/10/25 Wednesday
Data Analysis:

Time Mean Speed: 34.2
Sample Variance: 22.72
No. 75
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.7
10 MPH Pace:

Percent in Pace: 78.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.8
Variance of the Mean: 0.4544
85th Percentile Speed: 37
90th Percentile Speed: 40
Vehicles in Pace: 39
50th Percentile Speed: 35
95th Percentile Speed: 42
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
02:36 pm 02:53 pm
49 Direction: EBD/WBD
35 MPH
Day:

Hours: From: To:

MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 1 1.00% 1.00%
24 0 0.00% 1.00%
25 0 0.00% 1.00%
26 2 2.00% 3.00%
27 3 3.00% 6.00%
28 4 4.00% 10.00%
29 7 7.00% 17.00%
30 5 5.00% 22.00%
31 4 4.00% 26.00%
32 12 12.00% 38.00%
33 7 7.00% 45.00%
34 9 9.00% 54.00%
35 16 16.00% 70.00%
36 6 6.00% 76.00%
37 10 10.00% 86.00%
38 4 4.00% 90.00%
39 1 1.00% 91.00%
40 0 0.00% 91.00%
41 3 3.00% 94.00%
42 1 1.00% 95.00%
43 1 1.00% 96.00%
44 2 2.00% 98.00%
45 0 0.00% 98.00%
46 1 1.00% 99.00%
47 0 0.00% 99.00%
48 0 0.00% 99.00%
49 0 0.00% 99.00%
50 0 0.00% 99.00%
51 0 0.00% 99.00%
52 1 1.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Rodolfo C/Enrique S

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &

ENGINEERING SERVICES

RADAR SURVEY

CITY OF SALINAS
Data Analysis:

Time Mean Speed: 34.0
Sample Variance: 20.86
Weather: Sunny
95th Percentile Speed: 42
Williams Road
85th Percentile Speed: 37
90th Percentile Speed: 38
Vehicles in Pace: 80
50th Percentile Speed: 34
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:

Percent in Pace: 80.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.2086
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Date: 12/10/25 Wednesday
02:36 pm 02:53 pm
Street: Comments:

Between: East Alisal Street & East Boronda Road No. 75
Survey Location: 254 Williams Road
Speed Limit:
50 51
SEE MAP 6N44
SEE MAP 6P14
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Salinas

MONTEREY
·|}þ183
·|}þ68
·|}þ183

SALINAS

SANTA RITA

BOLSA KNOLLS
E Alisal St
E Alvin Dr
Market Way
John St
Williams Rd
W Alisal St
W Rossi St
N M
ain St
N Sanborn Rd
Pajaro St
Work St
Boronda Rd
Constitution Blvd
E Laurel Dr
Riker St
Lincoln Ave
E Bernal Dr
Abbott St
Cll del Adobe Post Dr
E Rossi St
Main St
Constitution Blvd
·|}þ183
·|}þ68·|}þ183
·|}þ183
£¤101
£¤101
N M
ain St
E Boronda Rd
E Laurel Dr
N Davis Rd
Natividad Rd
S Davis Rd
E Alisal St
Davis Rd
Sherwood Dr
W Laurel Dr
Salinas St
M
onterey St
Market Way
N Sanborn Rd
Boronda Rd
W Laurel Dr
N Sanborn Rd
Towt St
San Juan Grade Rd
Rider Ave
Blanco Rd
Central Ave
Chaparral St
Russell Rd
Garner Ave
Harden Pkwy
W Acacia St
Larkin Dr
del Monte Ave
Navajo Dr
el Dorado Dr
Villa St
Iris Dr
Rico St
Bardin Rd
Clay St
Independence Blvd
McKinnon St
Linwood Dr
Freedom Pkwy
Nantucket Blvd
M
aryal Dr
Maple St
Tyler St
Casentini St
Beacon Hill Dr
W Alvin Dr
Skyway Blvd
Adam
s St
Arcadia Way
Iverson St S Hebbron Ave
Arcadia St
Espinosa Rd
Old Stage Rd
Date: 3/30/16
SEE MAP 6N53
SEE MAP 6N55
Monterey
San Benito
Santa Cruz

CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1

B C D E F G H JA K

B C D E F G H JA K
MAP 6N54

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL

MINOR ARTERIAL

MAJOR COLLECTOR
LOCAL

OTHER FWY OR EXPWY
INTERSTATE 1
3 4
5 7
2 MINOR COLLECTOR 6
Monterey
Mile
Feet
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

AND LOCAL AGENCIES

COUNTY BOUNDARY

CITY BOUNDARY

RAILROAD

SIGN ROUTES

INTERSTATE
U.S.£¤3
STATE
ÿ||1
§¨¦5
52 SEE MAP 6N54
SEE MAP 6P24
!(
!(
!(
!(

MONTEREY
·|}þ68
AbbottSt
RomieLn
PajaroSt
RikerSt
WorkSt
HarrisRd
AlisalSt
Salinas
Salinas
£¤101
County Hwy G17
HarkinsRd
HarrisRd
SpreckelsBlvd
AbbottSt
IversonSt
Los PalosDr
AcaciaSt
San MiguelAve
TervenAve
HattonAve
AirportBlvd
HansenSt
HarrisCt
San JoaquinSt
HarrisRd

SALINAS MUNI

SPRECKELS
£¤101
US Hwy 101El Camino Real
US Hwy 101El Camino Real
BlancoRd
State Hwy 68Monterey SalinasHwy
SanbornRd
Ram
p
State Hwy 68SM
ainSt
Ramp
Ramp
AbbottSt
RomieLn
PajaroSt
WorkSt
RikerSt
HarkinsRd
HarrisRd
County Hwy G17RiverRd
SpreckelsBlvd
AbbottSt
IversonSt
County Hwy G17ReservationRd
PortolaDrPortolaDr PortolaDr
BlancoRd
SanbornRd
Ramp
Date 8/5/11
SEE MAP 6P13
SEE MAP 6P15
Monterey
San Benito
Santa Cruz

CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1

B C D E F G H JA K

B C D E F G H JA K
MAP 6P14

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL

MINOR ARTERIAL

MAJOR COLLECTOR
LOCAL

OTHER FWY OR EXPWY
INTERSTATE 1
3 4
5 7
2 MINOR COLLECTOR 6
Monterey
Mile
Feet
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 SIGN ROUTES

INTERSTATE
U.S.£¤3
STATE
COUNTY
4567D2
ÿ||1
§¨¦5

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

AND LOCAL AGENCIES

COUNTY BOUNDARY

CITY BOUNDARY

RAILROAD
53 SEE MAP 6N45
SEE MAP 6P15
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(

MONTEREY
Williams Rd
N Sanborn Rd
Salinas
Old Stage Rd
Williams Rd
Alisal Rd
Freedom Pkwy
Old StageRd
Old StageRd
BorondaRd
Old StageRd
WilliamsRd
Old StageRd
E Boronda Rd
Date 8/5/11
SEE MAP 6N54
SEE MAP 7N
Monterey
San Benito
Santa Cruz

CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1

B C D E F G H JA K

B C D E F G H JA K
MAP 6N55

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL

MINOR ARTERIAL

MAJOR COLLECTOR
LOCAL

OTHER FWY OR EXPWY
INTERSTATE 1
3 4
5 7
2 MINOR COLLECTOR 6
Monterey
Mile
Feet
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 SIGN ROUTES

INTERSTATE
U.S.£¤3
STATE
COUNTY
4567D2
ÿ||1
§¨¦5

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

AND LOCAL AGENCIES

COUNTY BOUNDARY

CITY BOUNDARY

RAILROAD
54 55
56 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-131, Version: 1
Delegation of Appellate Authority
Approve a Resolution delegating authority over appeals of Hearing Officer decisions on Fair Return Petitions filed under the Rent Stabilization Ordinance.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/2/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
57 Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: APRIL 7, 2026
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

FROM: RENÉ MENDEZ, CITY MANAGER
CHRISTOPHER A. CALLIHAN, CITY ATTORNEY

TITLE: DELEGATION OF APPEAL AUTHORITY

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution delegating authority over appeals of Hearing Officer decisions on Fair Return Petitions under the Rent Stabilization Ordinance (Salinas Municipal Code section 17-02.07(d)).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Under the Rent Stabilization Ordinance, any person aggrieved by a Hearing Officer’s decision on a Fair Return Petition may appeal such decision to the City Council. This proposed Resolution delegates the City Council’s authority over such appea ls to a neutral third party (e.g., Administrative Law Judge or Hearing Officer). The decisions of such , from a third partie on the appeals shall be the final decision of the City.

BACKGROUND:

Salinas Municipal Code section 17-02.07 allows landlords of controlled rental units to petition for rent increases above the maximum limits set in the Rent Stabilization Ordinance (the “Ordinance”) in order to obtain a fair and reasonable return on the lan dlord’s property (“Fair Return Petition”).

Such petitions may be granted if the landlord demonstrates to a hearing officer that such adjustments are necessary to provide the landlord with a fair return on their investment. The City has contracted with a th ird-party neutral Hearing Officer to consi der and decide on Fair Return Petitions. When the Hearing Officer issues their decisions, any person aggrieved by the decision (landlord or tenant) may appeal such decision. If no appeal is made, the decision of th e Hearing Officer is the final decision of the City.

Under section 17-02.07(d) of the Ordinance, if an appeal is made such appeals are to be heard by the City Council which may either affirm, reverse, or modify the decision of the Hearing Officer.

Consideration of Fair Return Petitions involves an analysis of patterns of rent increases, changes in the Consumer Price Index , changes in property condition, and evaluation of occupancy rates and changes in operating and maintenance expenses, among other factors. To facilitate the fair and 58 Page | 2
efficient hearing of such appeals the proposed Resolution delegates the City Council’s authority over such appeals to a neutral third -party with experience in considering such petitions and in making such analyses. The State of California’s Department of General Services provides such services through Administrative Law Judges. Should the City Council choose to delegate its authority over appeals of Hearing Officer Decisions on Fair Return Petitions, such appeals would be heard by these Administrative Law Judges and other third party neutrals identified by the City Manager and City Attorney.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project . The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:

No.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The City Council’s approval of the proposed Resolution supports the City Council’s goal of providing high quality customer service. (City of Salinas Strategic Plan 2025-2028)

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The City Manager and City Attorney coordinated with the Community Development Department on this proposed Resolution.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with the City Council’s approval of the proposed Resolution; however, cost of any appeals to neutral third parties would be covered by the City’s General Fund.

Fund

General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name

Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution

59 Page | 3
RESOLUTION NO. ___________ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION DELEGATING AUTHORITY OVER APPEALS OF HEARING

OFFICER DECISIONS ON FAIR RETURN PETITIONS
(SALINAS MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17-02.07)

WHEREAS, in order to obtain a fair and reasonable return on their investments, landlords of controlled rental units (as defined in the Rent Stabilization Ordinance—Article IIA of Chapter 17 of the Salinas Municipal Code (the “Ordinance”) may petition for rent increases in excess of the maximum limits set by the Ordinance (“Fair Return Petition”); and

WHEREAS, such Fair Return Petitions are considered by a neutral third-party hearing officer who considers such petitions against a number of factors including, but not limited to, changes in the Consumer Price Index, the pattern of rent increases or decreases applicabl e to a controlled rental unit, changes in property tax and other taxes related to a controlled rental unit, occupancy rates, and the condition of the controlled rental unit. Following their consideration of the Fair Return Petition against such factors the Hearing Officer either grants or denies, in whole or in part, the Fair Return Petition; and

WHEREAS, any person aggrieved by a decision of the Hearing Officer (landlord or tenant) may appeal such decision. Salinas Municipal Code section 17 -02.07(d) provides that such appeals are made to the City Council which is authorized affirm, reverse, or modify the decision of the Hearing Officer; and

WHEREAS, the City Council finds that review and consideration of a Fair Return Petition or an appeal of the Hearing Officer’s decision on a Fair Return Petition requires an understanding of the factors to be considered and experience in considering such factors in order to ensure as fair and efficient process as possible.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council finds the above recitals to be true and correct and incorporates them here by this reference.

2. The City Council hereby delegates its authority over appeals of Hearing Officer decisions on Fair Return Petitions as set f orth in Salinas Municipal Code section 17 -02.07(d) to neutral third-parties identified by the City Manager, or his designee, and the City Attorney.

3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager and City Attorney to take or cause to be taken such actions necessary to implement the intent of this Resolution including, but not limited to, the preparation of forms and promulgation of administrative regulations for the processing and handling of appeals of Hearing Officer decisions on Fair Return Petitions.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of April 2026, as follows:

60 Page | 4
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

__________________________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor

ATTEST:

________________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk
61 City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-133, Version: 1
Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration for Emergency Clean- Up and Stabilization of 37 and 39 Soledad Street
A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration for emergency clean-up and stabilization of 37 and 39 Soledad Street to increase the total compensation amount by $69,170 for a maximum compensation amount not to exceed $451,320.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/2/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
62 Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: APRIL 7, 2026
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FROM: LISA BRINTON, DIRECTOR
THROUGH: GRANT LEONARD, PLANNING MANAGER
TITLE: AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES WITH

CALIFORNIA PREMIER RESTORATION FOR EMERGENCY
CLEAN-UP AND STABILIZATION OF 37 AND 39 SOLEDAD
STREET
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 with California Premier Restoration for emergency clean-up and stabilization of 37 and 39 Soledad Street to increase the total compensation amount by $69,170 for a maximum compensation amount not to exceed $451,320.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City currently has an Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration for emergency clean-up and stabilization of 37 and 39 Soledad Street . This Amendment expands the scope of services provided and increases the total compensation amount by $69,170 for a maximum compensation amount not to exceed $4 51,320. There is no change to the term of June 30, 2026.

BACKGROUND:

As part of the on -going efforts to implement the Chinatown Revitalization Plan (2019), the City purchased the Republic Café and Lotus Inn (37 and 39 Soledad Street ) in December 202 4. The buildings are currently boarded up and were damaged due to a fire in 2022. In November of 2025, the City entered into an Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration for emergency clean-up and stabilization of 37 and 39 Soledad Street with a not to exceed amount of $247,150.

In January 2026, the City completed Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration to extend the term to June 30, 2026. In February 2026, the City completed Amendment No. 2 to the agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration to complete lead paint remediation. The City and California Premier Restoration have identified additional work to be completed related to hazardous materials abatement, exterior cleaning and removal of debris, and testing of roof drainage systems, as outlined in the attached Change Order 63 Page | 2
(Exhibit A). Amendment No 3. will allow the City and California Premier Restoration to complete the additional work and get the building prepared for future rehabilitation and restoration work.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project . The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:

Yes.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Development of the City-owned properties in Chinatown advances the City Council’s 2025-2028 Housing and Economic Development initiatives by supporting the development of mixed-use affordable housing and the revitalization of the Chinatown neighborhood.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Community Development Department is leading this effort with close coordination with Public Works and Finance Departments.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Funding for Amendment No. 3 will come from the City’s Chinatown Revitalization CIP (9070).

Fund

General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name

Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested
1000 30.9070-63.5900 Outside Services Other
Professional Services
$1,059,908 $69,170

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit “A” California Premier Restoration Change Order

3. Amendment No. 3

4. Amendment No. 2

5. Amendment No. 1

6. Original Agreement
64 Page | 1

RESOLUTION NO. ____ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR

SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF SALINAS AND CALIFORNIA PREMIER

RESTORATION

WHEREAS, as part of the on -going efforts to implement the Chinatown Revitalization Plan, the City purchased 37 and 39 Soledad Street in December 2024; and

WHEREAS, 37 and 39 Soledad Street are currently boarded up and were damaged due to a fire in 2022; and

WHEREAS, in November of 2025, the City entered into an Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration for emergency clean-up and stabilization of 37 and 39 Soledad Street for a not to exceed amount of $247,150; and

WHEREAS, the City completed Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration in January, 2026, to extend the term to June 30, 2026; and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas executed Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Services between the City of Salinas and California Premier Restoration in February, 2026 to expand the scope of services and increase the total compensation amount by $135,000 for a maximum not to exceed compensation amount of $382,150.

WHEREAS, City and California Premier Restoration have identified additional work to be completed related to hazardous materials abatement, exterior cleaning and removal of debris, and testing of roof drainage systems, as outlined in the attached Change Order (Exhibit A); and

WHEREAS, the City has $1,059,908 in the Chinatown Revitalization Plan CIP 9070 available for predevelopment work at 37 and 39, and therefore funding for Amendment No. 3 will come from the City’s Chinatown Revitalization CIP (9070); and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378). Any su bsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Salinas City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration for emergency clean-up and stabilization of 37 and 39 Soledad Street to increase the total compensation amount by $ 69,170 for a maximum compensation amount not to exceed $451,320. Funding for Amendment No. 3 will come from the City’s Chinatown Revitalization CIP (9070).

65 Page | 2

PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

_______________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk
66 22 Lower Ragsdale Dr / Suite F/ Monterey, CA 93940/ TEL 831-275-2103/ FAX 831-275-4188/ [email protected]/ californiarestore.com
22 Lower Ragsdale Dr
Monterey, CA 93940
831-275-2103
CA License #: 1013305
DIR #: 1000035801

Date: March 17, 2026

Grant Leonard
Planning Manager
City of Salinas
Community Development Department

Scope of Work – Hazardous Materials Abatement
Project: 39 Soledad Street
Salinas, CA
Overview
Provide all labor, materials, equipment, and supervision necessary to perform asbestos abatement at the above-referenced property. All work shall be performed in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations governing hazardous materials removal.

Pre-Abatement Preparation
 Provide and install full containment systems, including critical barriers, airlocks, and decontamination chamber
 Establish negative air environment utilizing HEPA-filtered equipment  Install engineering controls to isolate the work area  Provide all required personal protective equipment (PPE)  Provide temporary facilities and utilities required to perform the work Abatement Work
 Remove and dispose of asbestos-containing vinyl flooring and associated mastic  Perform HEPA vacuuming of all impacted surfaces
 Perform wet-wipe cleaning of all contained areas
 Apply encapsulant to treated surfaces
Work areas include:
 Main Level (Room 1, Bar Area, Hallways)
67 22 Lower Ragsdale Dr / Suite F/ Monterey, CA 93940/ TEL 831-275-2103/ FAX 831-275-4188/ [email protected]/ californiarestore.com
 Level 2 (Kitchen and Restrooms)
Post-Abatement Work
 Remove containment systems following completion of abatement  Decontaminate equipment and work areas
 Package, transport, and dispose of hazardous materials at approved facilities  Coordinate with third-party consultant for final air clearance testing Exclusions
 Third-party air monitoring and clearance testing
 Removal of unidentified or concealed hazardous materials  Reconstruction, repair, or reinstallation of removed materials  Additional mobilizations beyond initial mobilization
 Work outside standard working hours unless otherwise approved Regulatory Compliance

All work will be performed in accordance with applicable regulations, including Cal/OSHA, EPA, and California Department of Industrial Relations requirements. Certified payroll will be maintained and provided as required.

Duration
Estimated duration is approximately six (6) working days, subject to site conditions and coordination.

Total Abatement Cost: $52,870.00

68 22 Lower Ragsdale Dr / Suite F/ Monterey, CA 93940/ TEL 831-275-2103/ FAX 831-275-4188/ [email protected]/ californiarestore.com
22 Lower Ragsdale Dr
Monterey, CA 93940
831-275-2103
CA License #: 1013305
DIR #: 1000035801

March 25, 2026

Grant Leonard
City of Salinas
Community Development Department
Planning Manager

Change Order – Exterior Debris Removal and Cleaning
Description and Scope of Work Encompassed by this Change Order:

Provide all labor, materials, equipment, water supply, and supervision necessary to perform exterior cleaning and debris removal at the rear of 37/39 Soledad Street, extending to the alleyway.

Work to include:
• Removal and lawful disposal of all loose debris, trash, and discarded materials located within the designated rear exterior area
• Clearing of walkways and accessible surfaces to prepare for cleaning • Pressure washing of all concrete and hard-scape surfaces within the work area, including walkways and access paths
• General surface cleaning to remove dirt, organic buildup, and residual contaminants to improve overall site condition
Work area is defined as the exterior rear portion of 37/39 Soledad Street extending through to the adjacent alleyway.

All work shall be performed in accordance with applicable local regulations and standard industry practices.

Amount to Be Added to Original Contract Price:
$12,500.00
69 22 Lower Ragsdale Dr / Suite F/ Monterey, CA 93940/ TEL 831-275-2103/ FAX 831-275-4188/ [email protected]/ californiarestore.com
Effect on Payment Schedule:

Application and certificate for payment will be processed and submitted as required.

70 22 Lower Ragsdale Dr / Suite F/ Monterey, CA 93940/ TEL 831-275-2103/ FAX 831-275-4188/ [email protected]/ californiarestore.com
22 Lower Ragsdale Dr
Monterey, CA 93940
831-275-2103
CA License #: 1013305
DIR #: 1000035801

March 25, 2026

Grant Leonard
City of Salinas
Community Development Department
Planning Manager

Change Order – Roof Drainage System Testing

Description and Scope of Work Encompassed by this Change Order:

Provide all labor, materials, equipment, and supervision necessary to test the roof drainage system at 37/39 Soledad Street to evaluate flow and identify potential blockages.

Work to include:
• Visual inspection of accessible roof drainage components, including drains, downspouts, and associated piping
• Introduction of water into the drainage system to evaluate flow performance • Observation of drainage behavior to identify restrictions, slow flow, or blockages • Identification of areas of concern within the system based on observed performance All work shall be performed in accordance with applicable local regulations and standard industry practices.

Amount to Be Added to Original Contract Price:
$3,800.00

Effect on Payment Schedule:

Application and certificate for payment will be processed and submitted as required.

Exclusions:
• Clearing of blockages, repairs, modifications, or replacement of any drainage system components
• Work beyond testing and visual evaluation of accessible areas

71 22 Lower Ragsdale Dr / Suite F/ Monterey, CA 93940/ TEL 831-275-2103/ FAX 831-275-4188/ [email protected]/ californiarestore.com

Page 1 of 2 ends

Form: Agreement Amendment
Version: April 2026

AGREEMENT —AMENDMENT NO. [3] TO
37 AND 39 SOLEDAD STREET EMERGENCY CLEAN-UP AND STABILIZATION

BETWEEN CITY OF SALINAS AND CALIFORNIA PREMIER RESTORATION

This Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement for Services for 37 And 39 Soledad Street Emergency Clean-Up And Stabilization (the “Amendment”) is entered into this 7th day of April, 2026, by and between the City of Salinas (the “City”) and California Premier Restoration, a California Corporation, (the “Contractor”). City and Contractor may be individually referred to herein as a “Party” and collectively the City and Contractor may be referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the City and Contractor first entered into an Agreement for Services for 37 And 39 Soledad Street Emergency Clean-Up And Stabilization effective November 14th, 2025, pursuant to which Contractor agreed to act as and provide certain services to the City for compensation (the “Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the City amended the Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration in January, 2026, to extend the term to June 30, 2026; and

WHEREAS, the City further amended the Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration in February, 2026, to add additional scope of services and increase the maximum compensation to $382,150; and

WHEREAS, the City and Contractor desire to further amend the Agreement to reflect the additional scope of services provided by contractor and reflect the revised compensation to be paid to contractor.

NOW, THEREFORE, in mutual consideration of the terms and conditions set forth below, the Parties agree as follows:

TERMS

1. Section 1 of the Agreement is further amended to add the additional services outlined in the Contractor’s Change Order 2 (Exhibit A).

2. Section 4 of the Agreement is further amended to increase the total compensation by $69,170, for a total maximum compensation amount not to exceed $451,320.

3. All other covenants, terms, and conditions set forth in the Agreement and not amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect as if fully set forth herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as authorized representatives of the City and Contractor have entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY OF SALINAS

___________________________________
René Mendez, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Docusign Envelope ID: FF5A1FDE-3616-4E9E-A8EB-333CD313117C 73168

Page 2 of 2 ends

Form: Agreement Amendment
Version: April 2026

___________________________________
□ Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
□ Rhonda Combs, Assistant City Attorney

California Premier Restoration, a California Corporation

____________________________________
Printed name: Michael Mosebach_________
Title: President________________________

Docusign Envelope ID: FF5A1FDE-3616-4E9E-A8EB-333CD313117C 74169
Docusign Envelope ID: FF828B62-9320-46F4-B59F-9D61940B3A 1 A AGREEMENT -AMENDMENT NO. [2] TO
37 AND 39 SOLEDAD STREET EMERGENCY CLEAN-UP AND STABILIZATION

BETWEEN CITY OF SALINAS AND CALIFORNIA PREMIER RESTORATION This Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Services for 37 And 39 Soledad Street Emergency Clean-Up And Stabilization (the "Amendment") is entered into this 3rd day of Fedruary 2026, by and between the City of Salinas (the "City") and California Premier Restoration, a California Corporation, (the "Contractor"). City and Contractor may be individually referred to herein as a "Party" and collectively the City and Contractor may be referred to as the "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and Contractor first entered into an Agreement for Services for 37 And 39 Soledad Street Emergency Clean-Up And Stabilization effective November 14th, 2025, pursuant to which Contractor agreed to act as and provide certain services to the City for compensation (the "Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the City amended the Agreement for Services with California Premier Restoration in January, 2026, to extend the term to June 30, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City and Contractor desire to further amend the Agreement to reflect the additional scope of services provided by contractor and reflect the revised compensation to be paid to contractor.

NOW, TH ERE FORE, in mutual consideration of the terms and conditions set forth below, the Parties agree as follows:

TERMS

1. The Agreement, Scope section, is amended to add the following:

Additional services as described in the Contractor's Change Order 1 (Exhibit A).

2. The Agreement, Payment section, is amended to increase the following:

City agrees to pay and the Contractor agrees to accept as full and fair consideration for the performance of this agreement, Three Hundred Eighty Two Thousand One Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($382,150).

3. All other covenants, terms, and conditions set forth in the Agreement and not amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect as if fully set forth herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as authorized representatives of the City and Contractor have entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY OF SALINAS
Rene Mendez, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Form: Agreement Amendment
Version: July 2025

Page 1 of 2 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 5D106BCC-CE22-40DE-8B9B-C0F0A8CB8174 75166
Docusign Envelope ID: 5D106BCC-CE22-40DE-8B9B-C0F0A8CB8174 76167

Page 1 of 2 ends

Form: Agreement Amendment
Version: July 2025

AGREEMENT —AMENDMENT NO. [1] TO
37 AND 39 SOLEDAD STREET EMERGENCY CLEAN-UP AND STABILIZATION

BETWEEN CITY OF SALINAS AND CALIFORNIA PREMIER RESTORATION

This Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Services for 37 And 39 Soledad Street Emergency Clean-Up And Stabilization (the “Amendment”) is entered into this 30th day of January 2026, by and between the City of Salinas (the “City”) and California Premier Restoration, a California Corporation, (the “Contractor”). City and Contractor may be individually referred to herein as a “Party” and collectively the City and Contractor may be referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the City and Contractor first entered into a/an Agreement for Services for 37 And 39 Soledad Street Emergency Clean-Up And Stabilization effective November 14th, 2025, pursuant to which Contractor agreed to act as and provide certain services to the City for compensation (the “Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the City and Contractor desire to amend the Agreement to reflect the additional scope of services provided by contractor, to reflect the revised compensation to be paid to contractor, and to extend the term of the agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in mutual consideration of the terms and conditions set forth below, the Parties agree as follows:

TERMS

1. The Agreement, Term section, is amended to extend the following:

Work under this agreement shall be completed by 06/30/2026 unless City grants a written extension of time as set forth in Section 2.

2. All other covenants, terms, and conditions set forth in the Agreement and not amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect as if fully set forth herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as authorized representatives of the City and Contractor have entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY OF SALINAS

___________________________________
René Mendez, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

___________________________________
□ Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
□ Rhonda Combs, Assistant City Attorney

California Premier Restoration, a California Corporation

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37

77138

Page 2 of 2 ends

Form: Agreement Amendment
Version: July 2025

____________________________________
Printed name: Michael Mosebach_________
Title: President________________________
Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 78139

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 79140

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 80141

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 81142

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 82143

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 83144

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 84145

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 85146

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 86147

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 87148

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 88149

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 89150

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 90151

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 91152

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 92153

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 93154

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 94155

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 95156

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 96157

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 97158

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 98159

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 99160

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 100161

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 101162

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 102163

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 103164

Docusign Envelope ID: 173CE8B8-27C1-4212-8B88-E00EBE7BC26F Docusign Envelope ID: 1392BA27-E9E2-4D8F-92A5-92C4584A6A37 104165

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-149, Version: 1
Modification to Classification - Salary Schedule and Reclassification Approve a Resolution modifying the Classification - Salary Schedule and recommended reclassifications to add the classification of Deputy Director of Information Technology and reclassify the incumbent Information Systems Manager; adjust the salary range for the Assistant Finance Director; add the classifications of Deputy City Attorney I and II; adjust the salary ranges for the Attorney series of classifications; add the classification of Deputy Director of Library and Community Services; reclassify (Title Change) one Public Works Division Manager to Construction Inspection Manager; reclassify (Title Change) Public Works Division Manager to Engineering Division Manager; add the classification of Construction Inspection Manager; and dd the classification of Public Safety Information Officer.

City of Salinas Printed on 4/2/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
131

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: APRIL 7, 2026
DEPARTMENT: HUMAN RESOURCES
FROM: MARINA HORTA-GALLEGOS, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR BY: PATRICIA PEÑALOZA, HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER

MARIA AVILA, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST

TITLE: MODIFICATION TO THE CLASSIFICATION – SALARY SCHEDULE

AND RECLASSIFICATION

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution modifying the Classification – Salary Schedule and recommended reclassifications as follows:

1. Add the classification of Deputy Director of Information Technology and reclassify the incumbent Information Systems Manager

2. Adjust the salary range for the Assistant Finance Director

3. Add the classifications of Deputy City Attorney I and II

4. Adjust the salary ranges for the Attorney series of classifications

5. Add the classification of Deputy Director of Library and Community Services

6. Reclassify (Title Change) one Public Works Division Manager to Construction Inspection Manager

7. Reclassify (Title Change) Public Works Division Manager to Engineering Division Manager

8. Add the classification of Construction Inspection Manager

9. Add the classification of Public Safety Information Officer

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Staff recommend that the City Council approve the attached Resolution modifying the Classification – Salary Schedule to reflect the addition of Deputy City Attorney I and II, Deputy Director of Information Technology, Deputy Director of Library & Community Services, Construction Inspection Manager, Public Safety Information Officer and retitle the Public Works Division Manager classification to Engineering Division Manager ; and reflect salary adjustments for the Assistant Finance Director and City Attorney series of classifications.

132
Page | 2
BACKGROUND:

Finance

Staff recommend adding the classification of Deputy Director of Information Technology and reclassifying the incumbent Information Systems Manager to this classification. Additionally, staff recommend adjusting the salary range of the Assistant Finance Director to address compaction with the Deputy Director of Information Technology and bring this position closer to market and similarly classified positions internally. While the Deputy Director oversees all activities of the Information Systems Division, the Assistant Finance Director maintains responsibility for the entire Department in the absence of the Director or as assigned. These recommended actions are an initial ste p as the Information Systems Division of the Finance Department and Finance Department reorganize . The Information Systems Division and Finance Department have experienced significant vacancies and are leveraging staff to meet the increasing demands of the Department. This action recognizes the essential functions of the incumbent supporting the Director, elevating the position within the City consistent with the level of responsibility and helping align for succession planning and employee retention.

Legal

Staff recommend adding the classification of Deputy City Attorney I and II to the Classification - Salary Schedule in addition to adjusting the salary ranges for the City Attorney classifications in the City Attorney series. The Legal Department has had one vacancy at the Assistant City Attorney level since 2022. The City has conducted five different recruitments including at the lower classification of Senior Deputy City Attorney with minimal applications received and many o f the applicants unqualified . In December a job offer for Senior Deputy City Attorney was extended; however, the offer was declined due to compensation. Another minimally qualified applicant declined to interview. The City has advertised these recruitments on the Governmentjobs.com (NEOGOV) applicant tracking system; with the Monterey County Bar Association, Monterey College of Law and other sites; however, the recruitments are not attracting applicants. A recent survey of the attorney classifications fo und that all classifications in the Attorney series are significantly behind market between approximately twenty to twenty-nine percent in total compensation . The City Attorney has relied on contract legal services for additional support; however, the department seeks to fill this vacancy to support the increasing demands of the City Attorney’s office, an adjustment to the salary ranges must be made.

Library and Community Services

Staff recommend adding the classification of Deputy Director of L ibrary and Community Services to the Classification – Salary Schedule . The L ibrary and Community Services Department (LCSD) organizational chart includes a Recreation -Parks Superintendent overseeing neighborhood services, parks and recreation and a Deputy Librarian overseeing library services. These two positions help oversee divisions of over 30 regular staff each. These positions are both currently vacant and difficult to fill mostly due to lower compensation than comparator agencies. However, both classifications are on the same salary range internally.

The Deputy Director of Library and Community Services is a new classification that was drafted to serve as the second in charge of the LCSD and oversee parks and recreation or library services as assigned. 133
Page | 3
Staff propose using the same classification to recruit and fill the Superintendent and Deputy Libarian vacancies. Staff surveyed comparator agencies and found the second -in-charge pos itions to be approximately twenty-five percent below market . Staff believe that this classification recognizes the essential functions needed to support the LCSD Director, elevates the position for succession planning and brings the salary range closer to other second-in-charge positions in the City and significantly closer to the County of Monterey, which is one of the biggest competitors for the City’s library positions.

Public Works

Staff recommend retitling the vacant Public Works Division Manager in the Inspection Division to Construction Inspection Manager. This title more accurately reflects the current scope of work, operational focus, and responsibilities of the position. The proposed action aligns with the division’s primary function of overseeing construction inspection services and ensures organizational alignment with similar division-level management roles.

Staff also recommend a title change to the remaining Public Works Division Manager classific ations that better reflects the essential functions of the position. The title of Public Works Division Manager suggests broader operational responsibilities, but this position is primarily responsible for managing and overseeing the daily activities and operations of an engineering division. Staff recommend re-titling this position to Engineering Division Manager. This title provides clarity and highlights the engineering oversight aspect of the role.

Police

In August 2025, the City Council approved the addition of one Communications Specialist position for the Police Department; however, at the time, the job description had not been developed, nor had the salary range or bargain unit determined. Since then, Human Resources staff have worked with the Police Department and have developed the job description, established the salary range and bargaining group.

Staff recommend adding the Public Safety Information Officer classification to the Classification – Salary Schedule. The change in title more accurately reflects the higher-level duties and responsibilities this position will be performing than previously anticipated. This change aligns with the Department’s goal of building community trust and advancing departmental objectives.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:

No.

134
Page | 4

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The proposed action supports the City Council 2025 Strategic Goal of City Services, ensuring fiscal responsibility and finance management along with high quality customer service.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Human Resources Department collaborated with the Finance, Legal, Library & Community Services, Public Works and Police departments in this effort.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Finance: The recommended action will result in an increase in salaries of approximately $10,676 in FY 2025-26 and will be absorbed through salary savings.

Legal: The proposed action will result in an estimated increase in salaries of approximately $17,916 in FY 2025-26 and will be absorbed through salary savings.

Library and Community Services: The new higher-level classification will reflect an annual increase of approximately $66,600 for the two positions. The impact to FY 2025-26 budget is approximately $5,550 per month depending on when the positions are filled. The increase will be absorbed through salary savings this fiscal year.

Public Works: The proposed reclassification will result in an estimated salary savings of $1,283 in FY 2025-26 and ongoing annual salary savings of $5,130.

Police: The cost of the Public Safety Information Officer will increase from approximately $150,125 to $156,724, or approximately $6,600 annually. The increase will be absorbed through salary savings this fiscal year.

There is currently sufficient budget available and appropriated in FY 2025-26. No additional funds are being requested for this item.

Fund

General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name

Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit – A Salary Schedule
Resolution

135
Page | 5

RESOLUTION NO. ______ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION - SALARY SCHEDULE AND

RECLASSIFICATIONS

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Classification-Salary Schedule previously adopted by the City Council by Resolution is hereby amended to include the classification of Deputy City Attorney I and II, Deputy Director of Information Technology, Deputy Director of Library and Community Services, Engineering Division Manager, Construction Inspection Manager, and Public Safety Information Officer; the salary range adjustments for the Attorney series and Assistant Finance Director are approved; and the reclassification and re-titling recommendations are approved.

Attached as Exhibit A is the amended Classification - Salary Schedule.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

_______________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk

136
Page | 6

EXHIBIT A
CLASSIFICATION – SALARY SCHEDULE

137