Cities Index.
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report

Salinas City Council
April 7, 2026

Document
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report
Meeting
April 7, 2026
Body
Salinas City Council
Original file
3.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar2.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

City of Salinas PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • 200 Lincoln Ave • Salinas, California 9 3 9 0 1 (831) 758-7241 • (831) 758-7935 (Fax) •www.salinas.gov

2026
Engineering and Traffic Survey
For Speed Limits
Technical Report

PREPARED BY:

City of Salinas
Public Works Department
Traffic and Transportation Division
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, CA 93901

CERTIFICATION

I, Adriana Robles, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Salinas was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am experienced in performing surveys of this type and duly registered in the State of California as professional Civil Engineer.

Adriana Robles, PE, CFM
City Engineer

INTRODUCTION:

The 2026 Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) in the City of Salinas fulfills California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 22357 and 22358, which require local agencies to follow certain procedures established by the State of California. The E&TS are intended to serve as the basis for establishing and enforcing the speed limits for specific streets in the City. The work herein by the City Traffic and Transportation Engineering Division staff, in accordance with the California CVC Section 40802, reviews the established speed limit sections to determine whether changes in existing conditions have occurred which may require adjusting the posted speed limit.

Engineering and Traffic Surveys for speed limits are regularly conducted once every five (5) years by governing municipalities for the purpose of complying with Section 40802 of the CVC and the national Uniform Vehicle Code. E&TS may be extended to every seven (7) years if the arresting officer has completed device training and the device has been recently calibrated. E&TS may be extended every fourteen (14) years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or surrounding land uses have occurred as specified in the CVC. An E&TS should be conducted on new roadways or where traffic conditions have changed significantly.

The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), as required under CVC 21400, defines standards for posting speed limits that rely upon collecting speed data in the field to determine the 85th percentile speed, which is subsequently rounded upward or downward to the nearest 5 mile per hour increment. The CA-MUTCD allows for options to further reduce the speed limit. Additionally, local authorities are allowed to further reduce speed limits to consider the safety of vulnerable pedestrians under Assembly Bill No. 43. Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary summarizes the findings and recommendations for speed limits on those segments. The results of the E&TS will be valid until 2030, see Table 1 for details, unless extended through additional criteria.

METHODOLOGY:

On January 1, 2012, CVC 21400(b) became effective requiring the California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to revise the CA-MUTCD so that speed limits are based on field-collected speed data. A spot speed survey that typically consists of measuring vehicle speeds with an electronic device, most commonly a radar speed detector. Traffic traveling at free-flow speeds in each direction for a two-way street is collected and compiled to create a data set. The most significant data point collected is the 85th percentile speed, which is the speed at or below which 85 percent of motor vehicles travel. The 85th percentile speed is the industry standard data point which typically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. The reason that speed limit areas are established and posted is to guard reasonable drivers from the unreasonable behavior of a reckless or otherwise dangerous drivers. As with other laws, speed limits are established based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive a section of roadway as to what speed is reasonable and safe.

As specified in the California MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit “shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.” Additionally, the MUTCD allows the posted speed limit to be lowered by no more than 5 mph from a rounded speed, using one of two options that depend on whether the 85th percentile speed has been rounded down or up. The options may be applied as follows:

1. MUTCD Section 2B.13 states, “The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.” The cited CVC Section 627 defines an E&T survey that is required to consider prevailing speeds, accident records, and conditions not readily apparent to the driver, and optionally consider residential density as well as pedestrian and bicycle safety. According to the MUTCD, this option requires documentation of an E&T Survey that “shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.” The basis for a speed limit that is more than 5 mph lower than the 85th percentile speed is something other than prevailing speeds. In regard to conditions not readily apparent to the driver, CVC 22358 states that “physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning.”

2. MUTCD Section 2B.13 12a also states “For cases in which the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5-mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.” An Option 2 round-down, which became available when CVC Section 21400(b) went into effect January 1, 2012, requires no E&T Survey to post the speed limit sign. The E&T Survey is required nevertheless, however, to allow radar or similar devices to be used for enforcement.

Neither the Vehicle Code nor the MUTCD provide much specific guidance regarding accident data or pedestrian or bicycle safety. In contrast, CVC 627(c)(1) provides specific guidance on residential density. Many residential neighborhoods in Salinas meet the density threshold of 16 separate dwelling houses or business structures per quarter mile. The statute does not apply to roads within a business district.

While the California MUTCD allows two options for lowering the posted speed, it has no provision for raising the speed limit above the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed.

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS:

The result of the Engineering and Traffic Survey for one (1) roadway section is listed in Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary: ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS EXPIRING 2030:

Reduced
75) Williams Road between East Alisal Street and East Boronda Road - This segment of Williams Road is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes, retail, and school use. Speed data collected on December 10, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 37 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 28 mph to 37 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be reduced to 30 mph.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Engineering and Traffic Surveys contained in Appendix A of this report are intended to establish and justify posted speed limits that can be enforced by radar. The posted speed limits advise the motorist and enforcement agencies of speeds considered reasonable for a particular section of highway for prevailing conditions. The posted speed limits are not absolute maximums, but rather prima facie speed limits for which violations would be cited under the Basic Speed Law (Section 22350 of the CVC). CVC 22350 states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe, having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit merely suggests a safe speed under normal conditions.

Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary

No. Street Segment
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
85th-Percentile Speed (mph) MUTCD
Applied
Reduction
Option
Survey
Expiration Measured Rounded Recom-
mended
75 Williams Road East Alisal Street to East Boronda Road 35 37 35 30 1 12/10/2030

COLLISION HISTORY

The Engineering and Traffic Survey forms summarize the available collision information for each of the street segments.

The collision information was obtained from the City of Salinas from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024. For this analysis, only collisions during the 2-year period between January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 were considered. The collisions were reviewed and only corridor related collisions, those not related to signalized intersections, were summarized for each segment. Based on the number of total collisions studied over the 2-year period and average daily traffic (ADT) counts, a collision rate was calculated for each segment. The collision rates for each segment were compared to the statewide average rate listed in the 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways, to provide a general comparison of the collision rates on the segments to expected collisions rates for similar types of roadways, shown in Table 2: Collision Rate Summary.

Lane Type Total Statewide Urban Collision Rate
(2021, 2022, 2023)
(Total per million vehicle miles)
2 and 3 lane 1.03
4+ lanes (undivided) 1.27
4+ lanes (divided) 0.97

Table 2: Collision Rate Summary

No. Street Segment Existing Facility Length
(mi) AADT
Collisions
(2 years)
(2023-2024)
Collision
Rate
(Acc./MVM)
Statewide
Collision
Rate
(Acc./MVM)
75 Williams Road East Alisal Street to East Boronda Road 4+ lanes (undivided) 1.99 12,840 41 2.20 1.27

APPENDIX A

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS

CITY OF SALINASTRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERINGTRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOLDistanceVertical AlignmentStreet WidthNo. Lanes and MedianTraffic Volume (Date)Accident Data (2 years)Street Segment Collision Rate= (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles) Approximately 10,250 FeetFlatVaries (56 to 78 Feet)4-Lane Major Arterial12,840 (2025)41 Collisions (2023-2024)2.20 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone85th Percentile Speed30 MPH37 MPH
AREA
COMMENTS:

STREET:BETWEEN:SURVEY DATE:WILLIAMS ROADE ALISAL ST & E BORONDA RD12/10/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030)75 This segment of Williams Road is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes,retail, and school use. Speed data collected on December 10, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 37 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 28 mph to37 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds roundeddown and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be reduced to 30 mph.DESCRIPTION

SPEED LIMIT SIGNSIGNALCITY LIMITSSCHOOL CROSSWALKCROSSWALK

ALL-WAY STOPSTOP

WILLIAMS RD

REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CIVILNO. 69142ADRIANA ROBLES
I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(75) Williams Rd btwn Alisal & Boronda.dwgE ALISAL STQUILLA STE MARKET ST

E LAUREL DRFAIRHAVEN STGRANDHAVEN STBELLEHAVEN STGARNER AVEBARDIN WYWIREN STDEL MONTE AVE

FREEDOM PKWY

E BORONDA RD
25 MPHSCHOOL ZONE25 MPHSCHOOL ZONE
Direction: EBD
35 MPH
Day:

Hours: From: To:

MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 1 2.00% 2.00%
24 0 0.00% 2.00%
25 0 0.00% 2.00%
26 1 2.00% 4.00%
27 0 0.00% 4.00%
28 2 4.00% 8.00%
29 5 10.00% 18.00%
30 1 2.00% 20.00%
31 3 6.00% 26.00%
32 8 16.00% 42.00%
33 5 10.00% 52.00%
34 4 8.00% 60.00%
35 7 14.00% 74.00%
36 1 2.00% 76.00%
37 5 10.00% 86.00%
38 2 4.00% 90.00%
39 1 2.00% 92.00%
40 0 0.00% 92.00%
41 1 2.00% 94.00%
42 0 0.00% 94.00%
43 1 2.00% 96.00%
44 1 2.00% 98.00%
45 0 0.00% 98.00%
46 1 2.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &

ENGINEERING SERVICES

RADAR SURVEY

4.4 0.3856

82.0%
43 37
Standard Deviation:

No. 75
38 33.7

19.28 Variance of the Mean:

Speed Limit:

Date:

CITY OF SALINAS
41 33
Vehicles in Pace:
02:53 pm
East Alisal Street & East Boronda Road
254 Williams Road
12/10/25
Street:

Between:

Survey Location:

Data Analysis:

Sunny

0.6 10 MPH Pace:

Weather:

Observer(s):

Time Mean Speed:

Sample Variance:

Rodolfo C/Enrique S
Comments:Williams Road
02:36 pm
Wednesday
Standard Error of the Mean:

Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution

Direction: WBD
35 MPH
Day:

Hours: From: To:

MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 1 2.00% 2.00%
27 3 6.00% 8.00%
28 2 4.00% 12.00%
29 2 4.00% 16.00%
30 4 8.00% 24.00%
31 1 2.00% 26.00%
32 4 8.00% 34.00%
33 2 4.00% 38.00%
34 5 10.00% 48.00%
35 9 18.00% 66.00%
36 5 10.00% 76.00%
37 5 10.00% 86.00%
38 2 4.00% 90.00%
39 0 0.00% 90.00%
40 0 0.00% 90.00%
41 2 4.00% 94.00%
42 1 2.00% 96.00%
43 0 0.00% 96.00%
44 1 2.00% 98.00%
45 0 0.00% 98.00%
46 0 0.00% 98.00%
47 0 0.00% 98.00%
48 0 0.00% 98.00%
49 0 0.00% 98.00%
50 0 0.00% 98.00%
51 0 0.00% 98.00%
52 1 2.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &

ENGINEERING SERVICES

RADAR SURVEY

CITY OF SALINAS
Williams RoadStreet: Comments:

Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C/Enrique S
Between: East Alisal Street & East Boronda Road
Survey Location: 254 Williams Road
Speed Limit:

Date: 12/10/25 Wednesday
Data Analysis:

Time Mean Speed: 34.2
Sample Variance: 22.72
No. 75
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.7
10 MPH Pace:

Percent in Pace: 78.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.8
Variance of the Mean: 0.4544
85th Percentile Speed: 37
90th Percentile Speed: 40
Vehicles in Pace: 39
50th Percentile Speed: 35
95th Percentile Speed: 42
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
02:36 pm 02:53 pm
Direction: EBD/WBD
35 MPH
Day:

Hours: From: To:

MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 1 1.00% 1.00%
24 0 0.00% 1.00%
25 0 0.00% 1.00%
26 2 2.00% 3.00%
27 3 3.00% 6.00%
28 4 4.00% 10.00%
29 7 7.00% 17.00%
30 5 5.00% 22.00%
31 4 4.00% 26.00%
32 12 12.00% 38.00%
33 7 7.00% 45.00%
34 9 9.00% 54.00%
35 16 16.00% 70.00%
36 6 6.00% 76.00%
37 10 10.00% 86.00%
38 4 4.00% 90.00%
39 1 1.00% 91.00%
40 0 0.00% 91.00%
41 3 3.00% 94.00%
42 1 1.00% 95.00%
43 1 1.00% 96.00%
44 2 2.00% 98.00%
45 0 0.00% 98.00%
46 1 1.00% 99.00%
47 0 0.00% 99.00%
48 0 0.00% 99.00%
49 0 0.00% 99.00%
50 0 0.00% 99.00%
51 0 0.00% 99.00%
52 1 1.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Rodolfo C/Enrique S

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &

ENGINEERING SERVICES

RADAR SURVEY

CITY OF SALINAS
Data Analysis:

Time Mean Speed: 34.0
Sample Variance: 20.86
Weather: Sunny
95th Percentile Speed: 42
Williams Road
85th Percentile Speed: 37
90th Percentile Speed: 38
Vehicles in Pace: 80
50th Percentile Speed: 34
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:

Percent in Pace: 80.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.2086
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Date: 12/10/25 Wednesday
02:36 pm 02:53 pm
Street: Comments:

Between: East Alisal Street & East Boronda Road No. 75
Survey Location: 254 Williams Road
Speed Limit:

← All documents from this meeting