STANDARD PERMIT CONDITIONS
The following standard conditions shall be incorporated by reference into all permits and subdivision map approvals in conjunction with the Salinas Zoning Code and Subdivision Ordinance:
• Pursuant to Salinas City Code Section 1-8.1: Civil action enforcement, and Section 1-8.2: Liability for costs, permittee shall reimburse the City of Salinas for all costs and expenses including but not limited to fees and charges of architects, engineers, attorneys, and other professionals, and court costs) incurred by the City in enforcing the provisions of this Permit.
• Use of the property shall be conducted in such a way that it does not constitute a nuisance to the use and enjoyment of surrounding properties or the public. Any permittee, person, firm, corporation, whether as principal, agent, employee or otherwise, violating, causing or maintaining the violation of any of the provisions of this Permit shall be guilty of a misdemeanor or an infraction, as charged. Upon determination by the Planning Manager that there are reasonable grounds for revocation of this Permit, a revocation hearing shall be set to be heard before the Salinas Planning Commission in accordance with Section 37-60.1330: Revocation of permits, of the Salinas Zoning Code.
• The applicant(s) shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Salinas or any of its boards, commissions, agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval of this project/use. For Tentative Maps, this shall also apply when such claim or action is brought within the time period provided for in applicable state and/or local statutes. The City shall promptly notify the applicants) of any such claim, action, or proceeding. The City shall cooperate in the defense. Nothing contained in this condition shall prohibit the City from participation in a defense of any claim, action, or proceeding if the City bears its own attorney's fees and costs, and the City defends the action in good faith. • Notwithstanding any of the provisions in this permit, all improvements and uses shall comply with all other ordinances and regulations of the City of Salinas and all local, state and federal laws and regulations.
• No further development other than that shown on this permit or attached exhibits shall be allowed unless or until an amendment to this permit has been approved by the Planning Manager.
/:\ComDevlPlanning Share SpacelSite Plan Reviews|2025 SPR'sISPR 2025-014 - 200 Casentini/Approval DocumentslExhibit A - Standard Permit Conditions.doc
Revised December 5, 2007
Exhibit At
North Vicinity Map
Cypress Lndg
50 200
300-102 :800-009
300-107 A 300-20
COMMETR
200
gonna sn
SITE PLAN REVIEW 2025-014
200 Casentini Street
Exhibit B
/:ComDev/Planning Share SpacelSite Plan Reviews|2025 SPR'sISPR 2025-014 - 200 Casentini Approval DocumentslExhibit H - Vicinity Map.docx
SHEET INDEX
ARCHITECTURE
COVER SHEET
1 FIRE SAFETY MAP
OPEN SPACE XHIBIT
.0 . "nGAM GAMALO
BLDG, B ELEVATIONS
AMENITY BLDG ELEVATIONS
12.3 TRASH ENCLOSURE EXHIBIT
H NG A ELOOR PLANS
43.4 ANENT BLOG FORPLAN
13.5 DAYCARE BLOG FLOOR PLAN
UNIT PLANS
AS.0
PERSPECTIVES
NY SOV SONTE TVILSONO.
PLANT PALETTES & NOTES
WALL & FENCE PLAN
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Nd sves s sover da
CA.0 PREUMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN
Project Team:
Owner/ Developer Architecture Landscape
lousing KTGY Group, Inc. BKF Engineers MJS Landscaping SITE Exhibit id 51 University Ave., Ste D 1646 N California Bivd, Suite 400 507 30th Street, Los Gatos, CA 95030 Irvine. CA 92614 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Contact: Aaron Barger Contact: Keith Labus Contact: Kyle Christy, PE Contact: Mark Schattinger
VICINITY MAP
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS SCHEMATIC DESIGN COVER SHEET AA-T No. 20280276 SALINAS, CA COMIAPY 10 M0
Site Summary
Lot Site Area 4.59 AC (199,960 SF)
Dwelling Units 88 DU
Density 19.17 DU/AC
Aparment Buildings 1-5 121,240 SF
Amenity Building 6 2,400 SF
3-Story Tuckunder, Accessible Hammerhead Existing Tree Canopy Property Line 4,335 SF Affordable Walk Up Van Parking Turnaround 0.64
Apartments Building
Plan Summary Beds Une Area Quantity % Total Net S.F. Avg. Not S.F.
Plan 1-1 27.3%
Plan 2-1 N 22.7%
Plan 2-2 N 4.5%
aundry Room, Plan 3-1 1008 40.9%
Typical Plan 3-2 4.5%
75,960
Existing Easement
Type No. Units
27.3%
2Bed 27.3%
3-Story, Affordable Walk Up 3Bed 45.5%
Apartment Building. Typical
Parking Summary
Ratio No. Shortspaces No. Tandem"
Spaces Provided
Bldg. 1-5 Multi-Family
1 Bedroom 24 DU
2 Bedroom 24 DU 1.5• 48 (24 Open Pairs)
3 Bedroom 40 DU 1.5- 80(40 Garage Prs.)
FEMA Flood Line Total 152(1.7 sp/du)
Bidg. 6 Amenity/ 2,400 SF NA
Laundry Room.
Typical Bidg. 7 Daycare 40 Children (1 Sp. /6 Children
Grand Total
Single Story
7 Wide Sidewalk w/ Day Care Building *State Desnity Bonus Parking Ratio Two Story at • 3' Vehicular Overhang, "Tandem pairs are assigned to the largest units first. For example, 40 tandem garage pairs go to the 40 three- Hatch Area Typical Fence bedroom units, and are always assigned to specific units, never shared.
See L.5
Multi-Family Affordable Accessible Parking Calculations % Required*** 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom
Trash Enclosure, Typical 5% Required
Trash Enclosure. Total Required (1:6 -Van Inclusive of Total) 6 (1 Van), Basketball Court Typical % Required***
Remaining Parking Spaces
2% Required
: Accessible Van Parking intent Total Required (Van Inclusive of Total) 2(1 Van) Multi-Family Total Provided (Van Inclusive of Total) 8 (2 Van) Single Story Leasing and
Amenity Building Daycare Accessible Parking Calculations Total quired**** 1(1 Van)
Daycare Total Provided (Van Inclusive of Total) 2(1 Van) Colored, Textured Notes
Paving at Entry •*Required Accessible Parking for Mobility Units per 11B-208.2.3.1 & 11B-208.2.3.2 ***Required Accessible Parking for Daycare por Table 11B-208.2 Tot-Lot
Legend
Compact parking • Building Type
Transformer
CASENTINIST. Direction of Vehicle Travel Building Number 16-00
, 120 20, 0.0,
38-0
Visibility Visibility Residential Retaining Emergency Day Care Drop-off Accessible Daycare Entry 18-05 19-0° 18-0° Triangle Triangle Project Entry Wall Exits Van Parking
Typical Parking Spaces | Scale 16=1-0" Bicycle parking provided: 12 MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS SCHEBORUARY 15, 00 SITE PLAN A1.0 15 2220577 SALINAS, CA
3-Story Tuckunder, Hammerhead Existing Tree Canopy
Affordable Walk Up Turnaround
Apartments Building
• Property Line
LEGEND
Day Care Egress
Existing Easement Hose Pull 150' Max
3-Story, Affordable
Walk Up Apartment 60-0* 60-0°
Building, Typical
+ 20-0°,
FEMA Flood Line
70-0°
0-0°
coccoccad HERE MANLY
1 20-0°,
SnEa Fire 30.ok Tuning Hammerhead
Trash Enclosure,
Typical
Two Story at
Hatch
Building Area Summary
Day Care Drop-off Building Type Occurs Gross Area Total Basketball Court 69018003 Single Story Day Care Building A 13,440 SF* 13,440 SF Building Building B 26,950 SF* 107,800 SF
Leasing/ Amenity 2,400 SF 2,400 SF
Tot-Lot Daycare 4,335 SF 4,335 SF
127,975 SF
Single Story Leasing and Amenity - Retaining Wall Notes:
Building
*Refer to building plans for area breakdown by level.
CASENTINI ST.
Daycare Entry i
35-5
Residential Project Entry
Tandem Open Garago Tandem Open Gernge
Section AA | Scale 16*=1-0-
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS FIRE EXHIBIT A1.1 ktgy 888.456.5949 | ktgy.com !::3000
SALINAS, CA
Open Space 1 Open Space 2 - Open Space 3
LEGEND
CEGURED BE SP OF SALINAS MUNICIPAL CODE
Open Space 4
500 SF/DU, 88 DU
44,000 SF REQUIRED
EBE HE PROVIDED:
Open Space 5
Comn Spea 1
2t000
cc cc cc cc c
Open Space 6
Existing
Easement
Property Line
Basketball
Court
Residential
Tot-Lot nfant
CASENTINI ST.
Residential Project Entry Existing Easement
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS SCHEMATIC DESIGN COMMON OPEN SPACE A1.2 ktgy ese18 ge0)1g.com No. 20240276 SALINAS, CA FEBRUARY 19,2026 •T.O. ROOF
• -T.O. PLATE
8-6"
33-6*
9'-1" KEY PLAN
N.T.S.
1. FRONT ELEVATION
2. RIGHT ELEVATION 4. LEFT ELEVATION
MATERIAL LEGEND
STUCCO 1 - SW 6148 Wool Skin or Similar
N STUCCO 2 - SW 7038 Tony Taupe or Similar
STONE VENEER - Coronado, Rough Cut Wood, Rustic Cedar or Similar DOOR - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
TRIM - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
WINDOW - VPI, Adobe or Similar
METAL RAILING - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
ROOF TILE- Certainteed Landmark Solaris Weather Wood or Similar LIGHT FIXTURE - James Allen Kent 17, Dark Bronze
STOREFRONT- Kawneer, Dark Bronze or Similar
AWNING - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
GARAGE OPENING - N/A
3. REAR ELEVATION STUCCO (ACCENT) - SW 6664 Marigold
A2.0
388.456.5849 | ktgy.com HI ECTANE HAIICING CRATIP CANANTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS Ktgy No. 20240276
— T.O. ROOF
TO. PLATE
8'-6*
8-6* 29°
9-1"
KEY PLAN
N.T.S
1. FRONT ELEVATION
5 A LEFTELEVATON
2. RIGHT ELEVATION
STUCCO 1 - SW 6148 Wool Skin or Similar
STUCCO 2 - SW 7038 Tony Taupe or Similar
STONE VENEER - Coronado, Rough Cut Wood, Rustic Cedar or Similar DOOR - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
TRIM - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
WINDOW - VPI, Adobe or Similar
METAL RAILING - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
ROOF TILE- Certainteed Landmark Solaris Weather Wood or Similar LIGHT FIXTURE - James Allen Kent 17, Dark Bronze
STORE ON That Brown or or Similari
GARAGE OPENING - N/A
13. STUCCO (ACCENT) - SW 6664 Marigold
3. REAR ELEVATION
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS A2.1 388.456.5349 | ktgy.com
ktgy No. 20240276 SALINAS, CA
- T.O. ROOF
+ 20-0° - T.O. PLATE
* 15-6* + 10-0° KEY PLAS
1. FRONT ELEVATION
2. RIGHT ELEVATION 4. LEFT ELEVATION
MATERIAL LEGE SW 6148 Wool Skin or Similar
STUCCO 2 - SW 7038 Tony Taupe or Similar
STONE VENEER - Coronado, Rough Cut Wood, Rustic Cedar or Similar DOOR - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
TRIM - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
WINDOW - VP! Adobe or Similar
METAL RAILING - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
ROOF TILE- Certainteed Landmark Solaris Weather Wood or Similar LIGHT FIXTURE - James Allen Kent 17, Dark Bronze
10. STOREFRONT- Kawneer, Dark Bronze or Similar
3. REAR ELEVATION 11. AWNING - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar STUCCO CENT) - SIN B664 Marigold
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CANENTIN STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS SCHERUARY 1, 00 - T.O. PLATE
61 ₺ 10-0* KEY PLAN
N.T.S.
1. FRONT ELEVATION
2. RIGHT ELEVATION 4. LEFT ELEVATION
MATERIAL LEGINS
STUCCO 1 - SW 6148 Wool Skin or Similar
STUCCO 2 - SW 7038 Tony Taupe or Similar
STONE VENEER - Coronado, Rough Cut Wood, Rustic Cedar or Similar DOOR - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
TRIM - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
WINDOW - VPI, Adobe or Similar
METAL RAILING - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
ROOF TILE- Certainteed Landmark Solaris Weather Wood or Similar LIGHT FIXTURE - James Allen Kent 17, Dark Bronze
STOREFRONT- Kawneer, Dark Bronze or Similar
AWNING - SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
GARAGE OPENING -N/A
STUCCO (ACCENT) - SW 6664 Marigold
3. REAR ELEVATION
898.456.5849 | ktcy.com MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS
SALINAS, CA
Material coe-d
Stucco 2 - SW 7038 Tony Taupe or Similar
8ª Masonry Block Construction
Split Paver Cap- SW 6145 Thatch Brown or Similar
Painted Heavy Metal Door with Metal Posts - SW 6145
Thatch Brown or Similar
21-0*
ENERAL NOTES
-13-8%
Mi
3. Rear Elevation 2. Side Elevation 1. Front Elevation To Be Used fore - is Propean iT. S City Trash Standard No. 57A
Site Trash Summary
Residential Apartments: 2 trash enclosures*
Daycare Building: 1 trash enclosure•
Note:
*Each trash enclosure contains one 4-yard waste
bin, one 4-yard organics bin, and one 4-yard recycling bin. **Instructional signs shall be provided for recycling.
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENT STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS A2.4 132'-7"
Plan 3-2 Plan 3-2
38'-8"
Plan 2-3 Plan 2-3
Level 2
132'-7"
Building "A' - Area
Level 1 =5,620 G.S.F.
Plan 3-2 Plan 3-2
Level 2 = 5,205 G.S.F.
Level 3 = 2,615 G.S.F.
38-8" Total # 13,440 G.S.F.
OSO
Level 1
.- SCHEMATIC DESIGN FLOOR PLANS A3.0
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS scakc t4°• Ter FEBRUARY 19, 2026 HoRA
SALINAS, CA
13 Roof Plan
Mech.Equipment -
Screened by Roof
sal:
Plan 2-3 Plan 2-3
Level 3
SCHEMATIC DESIGN FLOOR PLANS
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SARAS ENI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS 0 !:: 1 scalese-re FEBRUARY 19,2026 BLOG A. 140'-1"
1 plan 2-1 Plan 2-1 Plan 3-1
Plan 1- Plan 3-1
Level 2
148'-5"
Plan 3-1 Plan 1-1
Building 'B' - Area
Level 1 = 9,778 G.S.F.
Level 2 * 8,586 G.S.F.
Foret Level 3 + 8.586 G.S.F.
Total = 26,950 G.S.F.
Closet Utility
10-0°
Close
Level 1
SCHEMATIC DESIGN Floor Plans A3.2
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SALNAS, IN STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 19,2028 Mech.Equipment -
Screened by Roof
13 Roof
Plan 3-1 Plan 2-1
8489
8ro
Plan 1-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 2-2
Level 3
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SCHEMATIC DESIGN Floor Plans
SARAS, CNI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS co: 10°- 1605 FEBRUARY 19, 2026 23-0 34'-0™
8'-5"x5
46 SF 46 SF
Master
180*11:5
Master
10-6 x12-0-
Living
Ronni Room
11'-0°x12'-8' 32'-0* 11'-0°x12-8" 32'-0*
Bath d
Dining/Kitchen
Dining/Kitchen
UNIT TYPE P2-1
I BEDROOM E PHROOM 2 BEDROOM/2 BATHROOM
·838 NET SF
641 NETSF 050 GROSS SE
7AS GROSS SE
36-6"
36'-6*
52 SF 52 SF
10-8810: 3- D:8X10-3
10-2410.3-/
0'-0*
Living
12:0×10-0- 32-0* 32'-0"
Bath 1
-Master
12.0%11:0- Master
Dining/Kitchen Bedroom
Dining/Kitchen 12'-0°x11-0:
M.Bath
UNIT TYPE P2-2 UNIT TYPE P3-1
3 BEDROOM / 2 BATHROOM 3 BEDROOM / 2 BATHROOM
CAR NET CE
1899 NET SF
#1028 GROSS SF ₺1141 GROSS SF
SCHEMATIC DESIGN UNIT PLANS A5.0
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SALSAS, IN STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS scale: 14º = ner FEBRUARY 19,2026
51'-8 1/2°
Deck 10-2x00-3-
7-0'7-7"
53 SF
Vaster
126X12
22'-10"
Dining/Kitchen
M.Bath
290
Z OROO/E ATROM
21072 GROSS SF
56'-8 1/2°
Bedroom 3 9-2x10 3
6'-6 x7-8' 10'-2"x10'-3
50 SF
wIc
Dining/Kitchen
M.Bath
UNIT TYPE P3-2
3 BEDROOM /2 BATHROOM
SCHEEORUA 19. 0% UNIT PLANS
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SALNASTNI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS ktgy e8 15 0 1 9. comg e sue, se
23-0"
8:9%8-5 Deck
8'-5"x5'-6"
46 SF 46 SF
Master 5:0Xm.3
Master
10-6X12-0-
Living
11:5*12-8* 32'-0" 11:0%12-8 32-0"
Bath
Bath CO
Dining/Kitchen Dining/Kitchen
00 UNIT TYPE P1-1 UNIT TYPE P2-1
1 BEDROOM/1 BATHROOM 1838 NET SF
641 NET SF 36'-6"
-743 GROSS SE 36'-6* 950 GROSS SE
Deck
9'-5"x5'-6"
2 SE 52 SF
10-8X10.3 10-8k10-3-
10-2*10-2
Living
2'-0°x10'-0"
_iving
12-0X10-0" WIC 32-0 32-0"
Bath 1
Moctor
12:0×11:0- Master
Dining/Kitchen Dining/Kitchen 12-0X11.0.
M.Bath M.Bath
* 200 D
UNIT TYPE P2-2 UNIT TYPE P3-1
3 BEDROOM /2 BATHROOM
SCHEMATIC DESIGN UNIT PLANS A5.2
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SANES IN STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS !!! CODIARY 10 A99
3-Story Walk-Up Apartment Building
w/ Tuck Under Parking-Typical
Trash Enclosure
Dutdoor Amenity Area
Leasing and Amenity
Building
Project Entry
Daycare
Storm Drain
Trash Enclosure
Daycare Entry
CASENTINI ST
CALEMATIA NECICN DEPSPECTVE
888.456.5849 | ktgy.com MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS ktgy FEBRUARY 19,2026 ASRIAL VIEW OF PROJECT
SAUNAS. CA
SAUNAS, CA 155 202:0276
FRONT VIEW OF 3-STORY WALK-UP FEBRUARY 19,2026 MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP 8B8.456.5849 | ktgy.com ktgy
PERSPECTIVE SCHEMATIC DESIGN CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS A6.1
No. 20240276 Ktgy
REAR VIEW OF 3-STORY WALK-UP FEBRUARY 19,2026 CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP 388.456.5849 | ktgy.com A6.2 orpepranuc SCHEMATIC DESIGN
LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS per SEC. 37-50.690:
CYPRESS LAND APARTMENTS
• SEE SHEET L.3 FOR LANDSCAPING AREA
EXISTING FENCE OPEN SPI A C. CALCULATIONS FOR OVERALL SITE
TO REMAIN
PROPERTY LINE
LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS per SEC. 37-50.690(g)(3):
EXISTING OAK CANOPIES • SEE SHEET L.3 FOR LANDSCAPING AREA
TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE CALCULATIONS FOR PARKING LOTS
EL-GIN VILLAGE REFERENCE NOTES:
APARTMENTS •STORMWATER TREATMENT BASIN • SEE SHEET L.2 FOR PLANT PALETTE AND NOTES • SEE SHEET L.3 FOR HYDROZONE PLAN
• SEE SHEET L.4 FOR WALL AND FENCE PLAN
EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENT EXISTING TREE SURVEY REPORT:
EVA GATE: • PERFORMED BY SAVATREE ON 6/18/2025
SEE SHEET L.5 • NEW 6° HT. CHAINLINK FENCE AT 15*
SETBACK FROM TOP OF BANK
BICYCLE PARKING NOTE:
- DOG PARK
• synthetic turf BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED: 12
• 36" ht. enclosure and gate BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED: 12 EXISTING FENCE BICYCLE PARKING- • dog waste bag receptacle TO REMAIN (oty: 4) FLOOD CONTROL CHAN • trash
WALKING TRAIL POCKET PARK • benches
• 0.30 miles to mail room • 2 bbas
MARIPOSA • green paint on paving for wayfinding • seating
APARTMENT MANZANITA
ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL
HOUSE
,. • PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PUBLIC SIDEWALK
EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN:
STORMWATER
LANDSCAPE ISLAND PER ZONING NEW 6° HT. CHAINLINK FENCE AT 10* CODE SECTION 37-50.690(g)(7) BASIN
SETBACK FROM TOP OF BANK
TYP
RESIDENT RECREATION AREA TRASH ENCLOSURE
• game court TOT LOT
• 940 S.F. tot lot 2-5 and 5-12 • 2 to 5 year old age group age groups) per MC 37-30.170. • shade umbrellas
• terrace with 2 bbqs • benches
• seating TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY STD.
• game tables LANDSCAPE ISLAND PER ZONING
BICYCLE PARKING LEASING CODE SECTION 37-50.690(g)(7) TYP. (qty: 4) • BICYCLE PARKING (qty: 4)
NEW RETAINING WALL
(SEE CIVIL ENGINEER PLANS) COLORED TEXTURED PAVING AT ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN • 10' min. depth
INTO SIN SUNE OF SIND
SEPARATE PERMIT) SHRUBS TO SCREEN PARKING LOT
CASENTINI STREET TOT LOT
5 LANDSCAPE PARKWAY
• per zoning code section SHRUBS TO SCREEN PARKING • newborn to 2 year old age group 37-50.690(gJ(21(b): TRANSFORMERS • shade sail
• see sheet L.3 for screening detail • benches
MS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTENTS + DAYCARE - B CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN L.1 SALINAS. CA (PUD 2025-003) (SPR 2025-014) (ZONING: RH-21)
MACHITRE MONTEREY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
ANT SCHEDULE
CYPRESS LANDING APARTMENTS
SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME. WUCOLS
OPEN SPACE
TREES
ARBUTUS X MARINA' 3680X
MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE STANDARD
- Bar EXISTING QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA CERCIS CANADENSIS FOREST PANSY 2480x MODERATE
FOREST PANSY EASTERN REDBUO
PROTECT-IN-PLACE
WESTERN REDBUTALS 2180X VERY LOW
SEE ARBORIST REPORT)
GINKGO BILOBA 'AUTUMN GOLD' 2480X MODERATE
EL-GIN VILLAGE UTUMN GOLD MAID NHAIR TREE
APARTMENTS HETEROMELES ARSUTIFOLIA 2480X
OLEA EUROPEA SWAN HILL' MODERATE
SWAN HILL FRUITLESS OLIVE
PROPERTY LINE PISTACIA CHINENSIS KEITH DAVEY 36'80X
2480X
2430X
SUERCUS SHUMARDS 2430X
SHUMARD OAK MODERATE
SCREEN MURE: COUMAR. 15 GAL
NOT MAR TYRAN SITA
ROUND-LOBED SWEET GUM MODERATE
STREET TREE IN 5 PARKWAY
TOTAL QTY: 109
MARIPOSA SHRUBS
APARTMENT MANZANITA
SEE SHEET L FOR PROPOSED SHRUB LIST 10.C. SPACING APPROX. 5,590 HOUSE 300 000"0
BIO-RETENTION BASIN
• 36" HIGH INFORMAL SHRUB HUDGE TO
AND
AMENITY DAYCAR......... SCREEN PARKING PER ZONING CODE
SECTION 37.50.690(g)(2)(a)
PROPERTY LINE
MS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTENTS + DAYCARE TREE PLAN L.2 (PUD 2025-003) (SPR 2025014) (ZONING: B#32)
HACHITESURE MONTEREY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY SALINAS, CA
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
HANT SCHEDULE
LANDSCAPE TIER DETAIL: LANDSCAPE DESIGN PRINCIPLES PROPOSED SHRUB LIST for COMMON AREAS CONCEPTUAL PLANS DEMONSTRATE THAT THIS DEVELOPVENT SATISFIES THE FOLLOWING I CAL GREEN RECUREMENTSE MATER CONSERVING AN NO NASTE SE SEND DO PR GUIDELINES SYMBOL BOTANICAL I COMMON NAME. SIZE
GUDELNES
1. PROVIDES VISUAL SCREENING, PRIVACY, AND NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, WHERE NEEDED * PROPS PEDESTRIAN PATHANAYS AND OPEN SPACE AREAS WITH LADSCAPE MATERILS WHERE FOREGROUND SHRUBS (SMALLE IRRUTUSY MASINA LOW BOTANICAL NAME: COMMON NAME: MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE STANDARD 1 PROVIDES FOCAL POINTS WITH A DEVELOPMENT, SUCH AS SPECIMEN TREES, HEDGES. MYERS ASPARAGUS
ASPARAGUS DENSIFLORUS MYERS' MODERATE
Mod. 2480X
KAMI ALREEN REALTY GREEN BEAUTY BOXWOOO
CIANELLA REVOLUTA LITTLE REV LITTLE REV DIANELLA Mod. CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS 2180X ERY LOW
FESTUCA GLAUCA 'ELUAH BLUE BLUE FESCUE
HEMEROCALUS X STARBURST EVERGREEN DAYLLY Mod.
IRRIGATION CONCEPT STATEMENT 2480X MODERATE
LAVANDULA DENTATA FRENCH LAVENDER 5 GAL
MAHONIA REPENS 1 GAL HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOUA
PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA WHEELER'S DWARF [DWARF MOCK CRANGE TOYON
ROSA X'RED CARPET CARPET ROSE IS GAL
48'80X MODERATE
ROSMARNUS OFFICINALIS PROSTRATUS DWARF ROSEMARY S GAL SWAN HELL FRUITLESS OLE
TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINCIDES STAR JASMINE
ONCOUNS DARLI MIDOLE GROUND SHRUBS (MEDIUM: 36 BOX
BOTANCAL NAME: COMMON NAME: CAME NOCE
A LANDSCAPE SECTION AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLA LESTERN SERVCERERRY LATANUS RACEMORI CANE NTS CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 2120XLOW
CAPABILITY, CONTROLL HOWARD MCMAN MANZANITA 15 GAL
ARCTOSTAPHYLOS D. HOWARD MCMNN
CLASS OF RELATION PIPE ALL ALINE SHUL BE CLASS T1S PIC, ALL LATERAL LINE SHALL BE BACCHARIS PILLLARS DWARF COYOTE BRUSH 1 GAL ANDSCAPING AREA CALCULATIONS - OVERALL SITE (10%): CIANELLA TASMANICA VARIEGATA" FUX LAY COASTUME ORTOO 2180X LOW PER ZONING CODE SECTION 37-30.210 CLASS 200 PVC.
LIGUSTRUM TEXANUM (SCREEN COLUMNS) TEXAS PRIVET
TOTAL LOT AREA: 99.960 S.F. (4.59 ACRES) THE IRRIGATION DESIGN SHALL COMPLY with THE CRITERIA of CITY of SALINAS WATER CONSERVATION NANDINA DOMESTICA HEAVENLY BAMBOO POLICIES and REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: GUING SUMARCH 240MODERATE RECURED LANDSCAPE AREA: 99.900 SS. x 10% - 19.996 S.F. (2.45 ACRES) RHAPHICLEPIS INDICA INDIAN HAWTHORN
RHAMINUS INTEGRIFOLA EVE CASE LEMONADE BERRY
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA: 77,360 S.F. (1.78 ACRES) (30%) MARS CANAUNT PINK FLOWERNG CURRANT 5 GAL SCREENINO URUS NOBUS BILITY TO PROVIDE SHADE: SOT RETENTION, FIRE RESSTNENESS ETC. THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE ISGAL LOW WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA 'CAST ROSEMARY CAL, Low I BAY LAUREL - COLUMNAR LAN SHALL BENITEGRATED WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF THE PROTECT. SUCH AS BULDNA PARKIN LANDSCAPING AREA CALCULATIONS - PARKING LOTS (5%): LOTS AND STREETS, TO ACHIEVE DESIRABLE MICRO-CLIMATE AND MINIMIZE ENERGY DEMAND AND BACKGROUND SHRUBS (LARGE STREET TREE PER ZONING CODE SECTION 37-0.680 (gX3) COMMON NAME! LIQUIDAMBAR STYRAGIFLUA BOTANICAL NAME:
LOCATION PARKING LOT TOTAL AREA INTERIOR LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: ARBUTUS UNEDO COMPACTA DWARF STRAWBERRY TREE 2480X MODERATE CALAMAGROSTIS X A. KARL FOERSTER FATHER REED GRASS STREET TREE IN S PARKWAY DAYCARE CENTER: 7.224 st 1,591 sl (22%)
DEPARTMENT WOUL TURAL STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS ON FILE IN THE CALLISTEMON CITRINUS BETTER JOHN DWARF BOTTLEBRUSH 5 GAL LEASING & REC, AREA: 2420 гг 482 sl (20%) CARPENTERIA CALIFORNICA BUSH ANEMONE TANDEM PARKING aL DOG PARK: 2013 633 sl (22%) CEANOTHUS IMPRESSUS PUGET BLUE SANTA BARBARA CEANOTHUS WATER CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES COTONEASTER SP. ATANFASTES 0 sr (0%) VISTES Y YRANES DRON FORTNIGHT LILY EE SHEET L3 FOR PROPOSED SHRUB UST 4 O.C. SPACING APPROX. 5.398 DODONAEA VISCOSA PURPUREA: PURPLE HOPSEED BUSH
BED A PARKING I GROUP 3,322 гt 136 1(45) GREVILLEAX NOELUF OLEA EUROPEA LITTLE CLE UITTLE OLLE OLVE UTILITY SCREENING DETAIL:
VIL MERE ENTER TONES PROGRAMED FROM AUTOLATE CONTACLLERS. RHUS INTEGRIFOUA LEMONADE BERRY 5 GAL BLING O EAST O 1,600 st 498 s/ (31%) PHOTINA FRASERI EN TOON PHATNA DETECT WATEREN BEER ENDS OF TURN TO STOP THAT STAINS OPERATOR ITTOSPORUM TOBIRA MOCK ORANGE 5 GAL 19,800 г 3271 t (10%) PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA VARIEGATA' VARIEGATED MOCK ORANGE SCAL
RHAMNUS ALATERNUS ITALIAN BUCKTHORN S GAL
PROPOSED PLANT LIST for BIO-RETENTION BASIN
LL PROPOSED PLANTS wil be COMPLANT WIN CITY OF SALINAS LANDSCAPE STANDARDS and GUIDELNES Nd CAL GREEN REQUIREMENTS for WATER CONSERVING and NON-ASIVE as DEFINED by PC
WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE (WELO) NOTE
BOTANICAL NAVE: COMMON NAME:
MUCOLS DATABASED ON CITY OF SUNS, RECON IS WATER EFACIENT UNSCAPE GROUNCE. ACHILLEA MILLEFCUM YARROW A UTILITY SCREENING BROMUS CARINATUS CALIFORNIA BROME Low
LINE-OF-SIGHT NOTE: CAREX OBNUPTA SLOUGH SEDGE
CASTLLEJA MINATA INDIAN PAINTBRUSH
SHRUBS TO BE MAINTAINED AT MAXIMUM 24° HIGH WITHN LINE OF SIGHT AT STREET INTERSECTIONS. DESCHAMPSIA CAESPITOSA TUFTED HARGRASS SCREENING OF UTILITY EQUIPMENT:
LEYMUS CONDENSATUS CANYON PRINCE CANYON PRINCE RYE ALL ABOVE-GROUND UTILITY EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW WITH A DEER GRASS ANIMUM 3 WIDE PLANTING AREA, PROPOSED SCREEN SHRUE WILL BE 15 GALLON SIZE
MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS SPICED TO SCREEN TO CEILITY AT THE TIME OF PLANTING SPREADING RUSH Lox
PROPOSED GROUNDCOVER LIST
AL A CRED REDURES ATE CONSENS NANASE DEEDS PE CURELINES BOTANICAL NAME: COMMON HAVE:
COPROSMA KIRKE TRANS COPROSMA
MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS
MYOPORUM PARVFOLLM OWARE MYOPORLM
ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS DWARF ROSEMARY
MS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SANES CAI STREET FAMILY APARTENTS + DAYCARE PLANT PALETTE & NOTES L3 (PUD 2025-003) (SPR 2025-014) (ZONING: #21)
MONTEREY CEVELOPMENT CORPORATON
CYPRESS LANDING APARTMENTS
OPEN SPACE IRRIGATION HYDROZONES - GROUND:
SYMBOL HYDROZONE WATER USAGE FACTOR (KC).
PROPERTY EINS
7.146 SF.
SARAT TE SHEACE
DRIP IRRICATION
EL-GIN VILLAGE HYDRO-ZONE -2
NORTH / EAST SUN
APARTMENTS 8,618 S.F.
DRIP IRRIGATION
500 WEST SUN
34.289 SF. LOW
HYDRO-ZONE -4
0 00
00 135000100100000 NOTE:
DETAILED LANDSCAPE AND RRIGATION PLANS WILL SUBMITTED WITH THE BULDING PLANS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.
Retarence Evaporanspiration (ETo) 48.30 TAP to MAWA Raisera
MARIPOSA
APARTMENT MANZANITA
HOUSE
!!
0182033
AND
MAYPARE
MS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTENTS + DAYCARE !!!! HYDROZONE PLAN L4 MACHINE SURE MONTEREY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY SALINAS. CA (PUD 2025-003) (SPR 2025-014) (ZONING: RH-21)
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CYPRESS LANDING APARTMENTS WALL AND FENCE LEGEND
OPEN SPACE SITE RETAINING WALLS, SEE DRAWINGS BY CIVIL
PROPERTY LINE. ENGINEER. TAN SPLIT FACE FINISH, ONE SIDE.
EL-GIN VILLAGE
APARTMENTS
0 C
EVA GATE EXISTING 6° HT. WOOD FENCE, PROTECT IN PLACE.
PAINT PROJECT SIDE, COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING
0 0O
00 FLOOD CONTROL CHANGEL
MARIPOSA
APARTMENT MANZANITA 3 A13008
HOUSE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, PROTECT IN PLACE
NEW 6° HT. CHAINLINK FENCE AT 15° SETBACK FROM TOP OF BANK NEW 6° HT. CHAINLINK FENCE AT 10° SETBACK FROM TOP OF BANK NEW 3* HT. CHAINLINK FENCE AT BIO-RETENTION BASIN WITH GATE
BIO-RETENTION BASIN
3-6" CLEAR OF PARKING
NEW 6°HT. FENCE ON LOW RETAINING WALL TO
MATCH EXISTING FENCE
MAIL
PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING FENCE COLOR
LEASING
AND
AMENITY DAYCARE
TERMINATION OF FENCE TO BE COORDINATED
WITH CITY TO PROVIDE ACCESS
EVA GATE
MS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP WALL & FENCE PLAN L5
CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTENTS+ DAYCARE (PUD 2025-003) (SPR 2025-014) (ZONING: Rn 1. 202)
LANDSCAPE MONTEREY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PAC La
!r01+
CASENTINI STREET
(64" WDE)
yeruA CANAmAN C1.0
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CARUNCNI STREET PAMILY APARTMENT:
FF 63.5
FF 60.5
FF 63.0
FF 57.7
SECTION C
FF 46.0-
SECTON D
FF 53.0
CASENTINI STREET
(64' WDE)
SECTIONE
CRAPINC SCALE
MLESTONE HOUSINO GROUP SARUNAI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS PETE AND CRADING PRAN C2.0 THa 1S
CASENTINI STREET
(64" WDE)
ILESTONE PREUMINARY UTILTY PLAN C3.0
ILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SARETA STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS
PERFORMANCE 2 SUMMARY TABLE
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION WORKSHEET
NEAR METATO CHOLATO SAN
CASENTIN STREET
PRIMMA CONTE
PERFORMANCE 3 AND 4 SUMMARY TABLE
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SANESTEN STREET FAMILY ARARTMENTS MLESTONE C40
CONTROL PLAN
City of Salinas
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SALINAS 65 W. Alisal Street • Salinas, California 93901 RICH IN LAND | RICH IN VALUES (831) 758-7251 • (831) 758-7938 (Fax) • www.ci.salinas.ca.us
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW - BUILDING
Date: 9/25/2025
Application: SPR2025-014
Address: 200 CASENTINI ST
Scope: 88 affordable multi-family units
Contact: Contact
Planner: Son Pham
1. Soils report for proposed work will be required at building permit submittal.
NO RESPONSE REQUIRED. REQUIREMENTS TO BE VERIFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
2. The occupancy classification, construction types, building area analysis, fire sprinklered for all proposed structures for Specific Building comments will be generated upon building permit submittal. Building permit shall comply with California Code of Regulations, Title 24
NO RESPONSE REQUIRED. REQUIREMENTS TO BE VERIFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
3. Please show accessible path of travel from the main entry connecting the structures to the public way, trash enclosure, and accessible parking.
NO RESPONSE REQUIRED. REQUIREMENTS TO BE VERIFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
4. Multifamily dwellings constructed for first occupancy after March 13, 1991 shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the California Building Code Chapter 11A. Verify accessible residential units are provided.
NO RESPONSE REQUIRED. REQUIREMENTS TO BE VERIFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
Exhibit Di
City of Salinas
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SALINAS • 65 W. Alisal Street • Salinas, California 93901 RICH IN LAND I RICH IN VALUES (831) 758-7251 (831) 758-7938 (Fax) • www.ci.salinas.ca.us
5. Verify the private balconies and adjacent doors and windows can comply with fire protection features as designed. See section 705 for exterior balconies and opening protectives.
NO RESPONSE REQUIRED. REQUIREMENTS TO BE VERIFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
6. Verify all fire rated construction, opening areas comply with the requirements of CBC chapter 7.
NO RESPONSE REQUIRED. REQUIREMENTS TO BE VERIFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
7. At least ninety days prior to building permit application, please set up a meeting with the Chief Building Official to discuss the process and expectations for proposed development.
• Plans
• Approximate timelines for applications and construction • Fees
• Turn-around-times
• Special inspections,
• Deferred/Separate submittals (trusses, sprinklers, P.V. systems, etc)
NO RESPONSE REQUIRED UNTIL APPLICANT IS CLOSE TO PERMIT SUBMITTAL
8. Specific Building comments will be generated upon building permit submittal.
Building permit shall comply with California Code of Regulations, Title 24.
NO RESPONSE REQUIRED
(End of Comments)
Raul Ortega
City of Salinas Permit Services
Community Development Department
City of Salinas
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING (PW) • 65 West Alisal Street • Salinas, California
SALINAS
RICH IN LAND | RICH IN VALUES Phone: (831) 758-7251 • www.cityofsalinas.org
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PURPOSE: CUP2025-025, SPR2025-014 & PUD2025-003 DATE: 3/18/2026 LOCATION: 200 Casentini St PLANNER: Son Pham
APPLICANT: Milestone Housing Group REVIEWER: Fernando Rizo, QSD ENGINEER: BKF Engineers Assistant Engineer
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL: Amendment to PUD92-006 - Multi-family housing project RECOMMENDATION: Approved with Conditions
SWDS THRESHOLD: Performance Requirement 1, 2, 3 & 4.
NDES CATEGORY: High Priority
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: Development Review Submittal prepared by KTGY Group, Inc. and BKF Engineers dated October 20, 2025.
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES:
Development Impact Fees - Development impact fees are estimated at $1,730,170.75. Fees are assessed and due prior to issuance of a building permit. Fees are based on the 2010 Traffic Improvement Program and Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Riparian Setback - The project appears to encroach into the 100'-setback from the top of the Reclamation Ditch, provide setback reference. Clearly delineate the 100-setback from the top of ditch. If applicant wishes to explore encroaching into the 100'-setback a biotic study shall be prepared under the direction of the City of Salinas Planning Department. The proposed chain-link fence shown is acceptable to City staff based on existing topography conditions.
2. Utility Plan - Provide more information pertaining to existing storm drain easement and the impacts of proposed improvements and building foundation. Provide depth of existing storm drain line closest to proposed buildings.
3. Grading and Drainage Plan - Provide final grading and drainage plan showing all proposed finished elevations and grades.
4. Utility Plan - Provide final utility plan showing all proposed grate elevation, piping size, material type and slope.
5. Site Plan - Access shall be maintained to existing City of Salinas Drainage Easement. Existing slope and sidewalk easements may be abandoned.
6. Site Plan - Proposed trash enclosure shall conform with City of Salinas 57A. Provide 2' minimum landscape strip, 2" weep holes, and concrete pad drainage patterns flowing towards required weep holes and landscaping strip.
7. Offsite Improvements - An ADA compliant sidewalk is required at all driveways. Indicate if the project provides a 4-foot-wide minimum ADA-compliant sidewalk. If not, applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit to reconstruct the driveway to provide an ADA compliant sidewalk.
8. Offsite Improvements - Identify any sidewalk damage that may cause someone to trip and falot Exhibit E
200 Casentini St CUP2025-025 SPR2025-014 & PUD2025-003 COA the sidewalk along your frontage. In accordance with City Resolution No. 4926 and State Code 5610, maintenance of the sidewalk is the responsibility of the property owner.
9. Offsite Improvements - Per City Standards, street trees are required at a maximum of 60-ft spacing based on street frontage. For this property a minimum of six (6) trees are required. If the existing improvements or the site cannot accommodate six street trees, the applicant shall pay the street tree impact fee in lieu of the street tree installation.
10. Offsite Improvements - Street lighting will be required along frontage. Provide photometric plan showing conformance.
11. Offsite Improvements - Any construction, reconstruction, or closure of the right of way shall require an encroachment permit.
12. SWDS Compliance - Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant shall provide a final stormwater control plan consistent with Appendix B of SWDS.
13. SWDS Compliance - A Stormwater Quality (SWQ) Permit will be required prior to any land disturbance.
14. SWDS Compliance - Landscaping plans shall be submitted for proposed bio-retention facilities, and these shall comply with City of Salinas 2021 Stormwater Design Standards.
15. Geotechnical Report - Provide a site-specific geotechnical report which includes infiltration testing at the proposed infiltration depths.
16. Addressing - Prior to building permit issuance, any change in addressing shall be processed via a addressing change application.
17. NPDES/Site Disturbance - Prior to issuance of a building/grading permit, applicant shall provide a SWPPP for review. Provide complete information including QSP information, required signatures and construction schedule. Provide completed erosion and sediment control checklist.
18. NPDES Compliance - Applicant shall provide construction BMPs for site improvements.
Notice: The Conditions of Approval for this Site Plan Review include certain fees and development requirements. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020 (d) (1), this hereby constitutes written notice stating the amount of said fees and describing the development requirements. The applicant is hereby notified that the 90-day appeal period in which he/she/they may protest these fees and development requirements, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020 (a), begins on the date the office land use permit is approved. If applicant files a written protest within this 90-day period complying with all requirements of Section 66020, he/she/they will be legally barred from challenging such fees and/or requirements at a later date.
Page |2
1: PerminENGINEERING PWVlan Review Fernando Planning\200 Casentini St CUP2025-025 SPR2025-014 & PUD2025-003 COA.doex DEVELOPMENT FEES (By Unit Size)
RESIDENTIAL UNITS (2025-2026)
Address: 200 Casentini St Permit #: ESTIMATE ONLY
No. of Units Demolished: No. of Proposed Units: 88
No. of Proposed Bedrooms: 192 Type of Unit Proposed: Multi Family Residence No. of Bedrooms Demolished: 0 Type of Unit Demolished: Multi Family Residence
1. STREET TREE FEE 2304.00.0000-56.5110
Street Frontage (LF) multiplier (per 60' frontage): $ Not assessed if provided by TOTAL STREET TREE FEE DUE: $ - applicant.
2. PUBLIC UTILITY IMPACT FEE
Building Square Footage (Credit):
Building Square Footage: 121,240
Fee per Square Foot of Building Area: $ 1.31
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER FEE DUE: $ 158,824.40 2301.00.0000-56.5120 Fee Per Bedroom: $ 707.00
TOTAL STORM DRAIN FEE DUE (Do Not Assess For Mixed Use): $ 135,744.00 2301.00.0000-56.5130
3. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
7 Trip Rate Per Proposed Unit(s) Total Proposed Trips: 616 Trip Credits Net Trips: 616 Location:
Fee Per Trip: $ 470.00 Existing City Streets
TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE DUE: $ 289,520.00 2306.00.0000-56.5150
4. REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE Per attached TAMC worksheet.
Fee assessed by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County $ 82,032.54 8809.81.8157-57.8640
5. PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEES
UNIT FEE SCHEDULE
Bedrooms Unit Size No. Units Fire Police Library Recreation Parks 1 743 24 $ 5,544.00 $ 30,552.00 $ 21,744.00 $ 12,120.00 $ 106,272.00 1 950 16 $ 4,496.00 $ 24,864.00 17,696.00 $ 9,856.00 $ 86,464.00 2 1072 4 $ 1,380.00 $ 7,656.00 5,444.00 $ 3,028.00 $ 26,612.00 3 1141 40 $ 13,800.00 $ 76,560.00 54,440.00 $ 30,280.00 $266,120.00 3 1162 4 $ 1,380.00 $ 7,656.00 $ 5,444.00 $ 3,028.00 $ 26,612.00 $ $ $ $ $
GOOD Subtotal: $ 26,600.00 $ 147,288.00 $ 104,768.00 $ 58,312.00 $ 512,080.00 Credits by Unit/Bedroom:
PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEES DUE: $ 26,600.00 $ 147,288.00 $ 104,768.00 $ 58,312.00 $ 512,080.00 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT FEES DUE: $ 1,515,168.94
Effective: July 1, 2025 Valid through: June 30, 2026
Estimate prepared by: AF
: PermitENGINEERING PWPlan ReviewiFernandolPlanning|200 Casentini St PUD2025-003 Residential Impact Fee Estimat Regional Development Impact Fees
Fee Calculation Worksheet
Last updated July 1, 2024
Project Name: Date:
Select the Benefit Zone: [GREATER SALINAS
Select the Agency: City of Salinas
Select the Land Use Type: Fee Schedule Enter the for unis Fees Apartment (Low Income) $1,713.66 $150,802.22
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Calculate by Fee per Trip (Only use for appeals) $442L $0.00 Subtotal: $150,802.22
Apply discount: 45.60% $68,769.68
Apply credits: $0.00
Total Regional Fee: $82,032.54
DEVELOPMENT FEES
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS (2025-2026)
(Including Hotels/Motels/Schools)
Address: 200 Casentini St Permit # ESTIMATE ONLY
Date: 08/21/25 Bldg. Area: 2,400 sf
1. STREET TREE FEE: 2304.00.0000-56.5110
• Street Frontage (LF) multiplier (per 60' frontage) $426: $ _Not assessed if provided by TOTAL STREET TREE FEE DUE: $ applicant
2. SANITARY SEWER FEE: 2301.00.0000-56.5120
Building Square Footage: 2400
$1.14/sf (Commercial): $ 2,736.00
$0.57/sf (Industrial): $
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER FEE DUE: I$ 2,736.00
3. STORM DRAIN FEE: 2301.00.0000-56.5130
2,400 Isf property 43,560 sf/acre: 0.055
@ $8,978/acre: $ 494.66
(School Rate) @ $7,161/acre:
TOTAL STORM DRAIN FEE DUE: $ 494.66
4. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE: 2306.00.0000-56.5150
Building Square Footage: 2,400
Use: 495 Divided by 1,000: 2.400 0.000 0.000
Category: Recreation Community Center Trip Rate (TFO): 29 Trips: 69 0
Total Trips: 69
- Estimate per 2010 Traffic
@ $470/trip ($680/trip in FGA): $ 32,508.96 improvement Program TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE DUE: $ 32,508.96
5. REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE 8809.81.8157-57.8640 Per TAMC fee schedule
Fee assessed by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County $ 16,634.60
6. PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEE
FIRE IMPACT FEE $645/ksf (Commercial) = $ 1,548.00
FIRE IMPACT FEE $147/ksf (Industrial) = $
POLICE IMPACT FEE $858/ksf (Commercial) = $ 2,059.20
POLICE IMPACT FEE $573/ksf (Industrial) =
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEE $ 3,607.20
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT FEES DUE: $ 55,981.41
Effective: July 1, 2025 Valid through: June 30, 2026
1: \Permit ENGINEERING PW Plan Review \Fernando \Planning\200 Casentini St PUD2025-003 Commercial Impact Fee Estimate Club Room 8/21/2025 Regional Development Impact Fees
Fee Calculation Worksheet
Last updated July 1, 2024
Project Name: Date:
Select the Benefit Zone: GREATER SALINAS
Select the Agency: City of Salinas
Select the Land Use Type: Fee Schedule Enter the # of Units Fees $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
3 $0.00 $0.00
4 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Calculate by Fee per Trip (Only use for appeals): $442 69 $30,579.75 Subtotal: $30,579.75
Apply discount: 45.60% $13,945.15
Apply credits: $0.00
Total Regional Fee: $16,634.60
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) - Senate Bill 13 (Wieckowski, 2019)[ ADUs under 750 square feet are exempt from impact fees.
ADUs over 750 square feet are assessed impacts fees that are proportional to the size of the primary residence.
1. In the worksheet above, for "Select the Land Use Type", choose "Single-Family"
2. Next, calculate the proportion of the ADU to the main residence and enter that figure in "Enter the # of Units Primary Residence - Square Feet:
ADU - Square Feet:
Proportion:
DEVELOPMENT FEES
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 2025-2026)
(Including Hotels/Motels/Schools)
Address: 200 Casentini St Permit#: ESTIMATE ONLY
Date: 08/21/25 Bldg. Area: 4,335 sf
1. STREET TREE FEE: 2304.00.0000-56.5110
0 Street Frontage (LF) multiplier (per 60' frontage) $426: $ Not assessed if provided by : applicant
TOTAL STREET TREE FEE DUE: $
2. SANITARY SEWER FEE: 2301.00.0000-56.5120
Building Square Footage: 4335
$1.14/sf (Commercial): $ 4,941.90
$0.57/sf (Industrial): $
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER FEE DUE: 4,941.90
3. STORM DRAIN FEE: 2301.00.0000-56.5130
4,335 sf property 43,560 sf/acre: 0.100
@ $8,978/acre: $ 893.47
(School Rate) @ $7,161/acre:
TOTAL STORM DRAIN FEE DUE: 893.47
4. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE: 2306.00.0000-56.5150
Building Square Footage: 4,335
Use: 565 Divided by 1,000: 4.335 0.000 0.000
Category: Day Care Center Trip Rate (TFO): 48
Trips: 206
Total Trips: 206
-Estimate per 2010 Traffic
@ $470/trip ($680/trip in FGA): $ 97,023.37 - Improvement Program TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE DUE: $ 97,023.37
5. REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE 8809.81.8157-57.8640 Per TAMC fee schedule
Fee assessed by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County $ 49,646.15
6. PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEE
FIRE IMPACT FEE $645/ksf (Commercial) = $ 2,796.08
FIRE IMPACT FEE $147/ksf (Industrial) = $
POLICE IMPACT FEE $858/ksf (Commercial) = $ 3,719.43
POLICE IMPACT FEE $573/ksf (Industrial) = $
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEE 6,515.51
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT FEES DUE: $ 159,020.40
Effective: July 1, 2025 Valid through: June 30, 2026
:\Permit ENGINEERING PW\Plan Review|Fernando\Planning|200 Casentini St PUD2025-003 Commercial Impact Fee Estimate Child Care Center8/21/2025 Regional Development Impact Fees
Fee Calculation Worksheet
Last updated July 1, 2024
Project Name: Date:
[Select the Benefit Zone: GREATER SALINAS
Select the Agency: City of Salinas
Select the Land Use Type: Fee Schedule Enter the # of Units Fees 1 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
4 $0.00 $0.00
5 $0.00 $0.00
Calculate by Fee per Trip (Only use for appeals): $442 206 $91,265.61 Subtotal: $91,265.61
Apply discount: 45.60% $41,619.46
Apply credits: $0.00
Total Regional Fee: $09,646.15
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) - Senate Bill 13 (Wieckowski, 2019) ADUs under 750 square feet are exempt from impact fees. \DUs over 750 square feet are assessed impacts fees that are proportional to the size of the primary residenc . In the worksheet above, for "Select the Land Use Type", choose "Single-Family
2. Next, calculate the proportion of the ADU to the main residence and enter that figure in "Enter the # of Units Primary Residence - Square Feet:
ADU - Square Feet:
Proportion:
FIRE City of Salinas
NAS SALINAS FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Prevention Division - Office of the Fire Marshal
200 Lincoln Avenue • Salinas, California 93901
831) 758-7466 • [email protected]
EST. 1874
Plan Review Notes
Date: March 10, 2026
Project Number PUD2025-003, SPR2025-014 & CUP2025-025
Owner Name INTERIM, INC.
Monterey County Housing Authority
Applicant Name Milestone Housing Group
Address 200 Casentini Street
Project Description AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (PUD 92-006) - PUD 2025-003; A REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT 88 AFFORDABLE MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS (SPR 2025-014) WITH A DAY CARE CENTER (CUP
2025-025) LOCATED AT 200 CASENTINI STREET IN THE
RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (R-H-2.1) ZONING
DISTRICT
Plan Review Sequence 1s Review - SPR2025-014 & CUP2025-025 2nd Review - PUD2025-003
3rd Review - PUD2025-003, SPR2025-014 & CUP2025-025
4" Review - PUD2025-003, SPR2025-014 & CUP2025-025
Plans for the above-referenced project have been reviewed. Revisions are required.
1. Fire Safety Requirements - General - The fire safety requirements recorded with the original planned unit development PUD92-006 are hereby superseded by the fire safety requirements set forth in PUD2025-003.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: None
2. Fire Sprinkler Standard
The fire sprinkler standards that will apply to this project are as follows:
a. Amenity/Leasing Office (Group B and Group A occupancies) - NFPA 13 - This fire sprinkler system is optional under the Salinas Municipal Code and is being proposed as an option of the applicant.
b. Apartment Buildings (Group R-2 occupancy) - NFPA 13R or NFPA 13, pursuant to the determination by the Building Official. The fire sprinkler standard will be a minimum of NFPA 13R, but may be upgraded to NFPA 13 based on building code requirements determined during plan review due to fire separation distance, allowable building area, type of construction, etc. The architect shall clearly Exhibit F
indicate on the plans the fire sprinkler standard that is intended to be considered during building permit plan review.
c. Child Care Center - NFPA 13 - If this childcare center is classified as a Group E occupancy, then fire sprinkler system is proposed as an option of the applicant. If the facility is classified as a Group 1-4 occupancy, it will be a required fire sprinkler system.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, Include the appropriate code analysis.
3. Fire Flow - Add the following note to the plans:
Fire flow shall be provided at a minimum rate of 1,500 gpm with a residual pressure of 20 psi for a duration of 2 hours.
This fire flow rate is based on the largest building with a fire area of 26,950 square feet and Type V-B construction as listed in Table B105.2 of the California Fire Code, with reduction granted per Footnotes a. and b.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, Add this note on the plans, and ensure it is on the plans presented with the fire service application to California Water Service.
Fire Hydrant Relocation - Sheet C3.0 - Relocate the existing fire hydrant located on the west side of the proposed apartment complex driveway to the east side. This relocation will increase access to the hydrant for both the apartment complex and the childcare center. Refer to the markup image below.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: None. Utility site plans have been revised to reflect this installation during construction.
but the fire department connections ("FDCs") and post indicating valves ("PIVs") shall be installed separately for each sprinklered building.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, Revise this note on the plans.
6. Fire Service Connection Location - Sheet C3.0 - Child Care Center - The fire service connection to California Water Service and the Fire Backflow Preventer shall be separate for the childcare center. The Fire Backflow Preventer shall include the following features:
a. tamper switches connected to the childcare center fire alarm system b. fire department connection with two 2-1/2" inlets and Knox brand locking FDO caps
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, reflect these fire protection devices on the utility plans.
7. Maximum Occupant Load - Leasing & Amenity Bldg. - Club Room - Sheet A3.4 - The Club Room is proposed to have an area of 478 square teet. As an assembly use, the space has a maximum occupant load of 68 based on concentrated use without fixed seating or tables (478 sq. ft./7 occupant load factor), and therefore, two (2) exits would be required from the Club Room space.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, Revise the plans to reflect the exiting and path of travel pursuant to California Building Code Chapter 10, Table 1006.2.1, Table 1004.5., Section 1009.
8. Fire Lanes - Add details to the plans for fire lane designations including painted red-curbs marked with "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" per California Fire Code Section 503.3.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, Add fire lane details to the plans.
9. Knox Box - Add details to the plans as follows pursuant to California Fire Code Section 506:
a. Site locations
i. Leasing & Amenity Building exterior wall next to its main entrance ii. Childcare Center exterior wall next to its main entrance b. Building locations - Knox boxes shall be mounted between four and six feet above ground (floor) level, readily visible and not more than 12 feet from the main entry of the premises.
c. Required Keys - The following keys shall be provided: (1) grand master key; (1) fire alarm cabinet key. All utility, mechanical and amenity/leasing building keys shall conform to a master key system.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, Add Knox box details and specification notes to the plans.
10. Portable Fire Extinguishers - Per California Fire Code Section 906, portable fire extinguisher(s) with a minimum rating of 2A: 10B:C shall be installed and maintained on an approved bracket or cabinet at the following locations:
a. Apartment buildings - Centrally located on the building exterior on each level within a maximum travel distance of 75 feet from each Group R-2 dwelling unit, or one (1) portable fire extinguisher mounted and maintained on an approved bracket or cabinet inside each of the Group R-2 dwelling units. b. Leasing & Amenity Building - One (1) portable fire extinguisher in the lobby and one (1) in the Club Room.
c. Child Care Center - The fire extinguisher locations can be determined at the time of building permit application.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, Revise the plans to reflect these fire extinguisher locations and specifications.
11. Address Posting
Add a note to the plans as follows:
(a) All residential including multifamily residential addresses must be clearly identified with a number/letter a minimum of three and one-half inches high and one-half inch stroke and located on or adjacent to the entrance. If provided, the addresses) shall be placed on the freestanding or monument sign corresponding to the adjacent building(s).
(b) Clustered units/apartments/condominiums shall have a single number/letter for the cluster posted where it is clearly identified from the street or road.
Individual units in the cluster will be numbered alphabetically or numerically with letters a minimum of three and one-half inches high and located on or adjacent to the entrance of the unit.
(c) A directory board is required at the entrance of the apartment complex indicating the direction and building number or letter. Where a building is set back from the street or road, the address number or letter shall be determined for both the street approach and on the building, in accordance to the following standards:
(1) Zero to thirty-foot distance: four inches minimum height and one-half inch minimum stroke width.
(2) Thirty-one to fifty-foot distance: six inches minimum height and three-fourths inch minimum stroke width.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, Print this note and include address specifications on the plans.
12. Building Identification - Add the following details to the plans:
a. All buildings (except the trash enclosures) shall be clearly identified by a sign with numbers or letters with a minimum height of 6 inches on a contrasting background. b. All buildings shall have building identification numbers or letters installed on the sides facing the fire access road and on the back side.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, Print this note and include building identification sign specifications on the plans.
13. Emergency Access Gate - Add the following note to the plan:
An emergency access gate is required for fire department use at the northwest end of the fire access road. The gate shall be secured with a standard padlock capable of being removed by fire personnel with a bolt cutter. Signage shall be posted and maintained on both sides of the gate that reads "EMERGENCY ACCESS - DO NOT BLOCK".
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, Print this note on the plans.
14. Fire Apparatus Access Road - Revise the driveway detail to reflect the fire apparatus access road weight-rating requirements of Section 503.2.3 of the California Fire Code as amended in the City of Salinas Municipal Code.
RESPONSE REQUIRED: At the time of building permit submittal, revise this detail and specification on the roadway improvement plans.
Plans reviewed by: DOROTHY PRIOLO, Deputy Fire Marshal
City of Salinas
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SALINAS 65 W. Alisal Streel, 2nd Floor • Salinas, California 93901 RICH IN LAND | RICH IN VALUES (831) 758-7387 • (831) 775-4258 (Fax) • www.ci.salinas.ca.us DATE: August 20, 2025
TO: Son Pham-Gallardo, Senior Planner
FROM: Stephen Acker, Sr. Community Development Analyst
RE: Housing Division Comments - 1st Review - PUD 2025-003; Application for Site Plan Review of proposed 100% affordable large family multi-family housing community with approximately 88 dwelling units on a
4.9 acre parcel.
The above referenced project is subject to the City of Salinas' Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Per Section 17-16 of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, the owner/developer needs to address the comment below:
1. A Planned Unit Development (PUD) was submitted to the City on July 30, 2025, and it did not include an Affordable Housing Plan. The application provided indicates the proposed development of approximately 88 residential units. The Developer must state the number of housing units set aside for affordable housing under the City's Inclusionary Housing Guidelines and shall include it in the Affordable Housing Plan. The options can be found under the City's Inclusionary Housing Guidelines. The owner/developer needs to complete the provided Affordable Housing Plan template provided upon resubmittal. If the owner/developer is contemplating utilizing the Density Bonus Law to maximize the number of units produced in the Site Plan, this information needs to be included into the Affordable Housing Plan. If tapping into the Density Bonus Law, the owner/developer needs to also specify the Density Bonus percentage requested as well as any incentives, concessions, waivers, and reductions in the development standards being requested. All information needs to be detailed and integrated into the Affordable Housing Plan. Upon resubmittal, please provide a draft of the Affordable Housing Plan in PDF and Microsoft Word format to the City.
Response:
Exhibit G
Copies of the following are attached to assist in the completion of an Affordable Housing Plan submission:
• City of Salinas Inclusionary Ordinance
• City of Salinas Inclusionary Housing Guidelines
• Affordable Housing Plan Template
Prior to the approval of the Site Plan for the proposed subdivision or the issuance of a Building Permit, the project's Developer/Owner and City shall execute any of the following documents applicable to the project:
Inclusionary Rental Regulatory Agreement and Occupancy Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Density Bonus Rental Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants (only if applicable)
Marketing Plan for Inclusionary Housing Units
Management Plan for Inclusionary Housing Units
• Management Plan for Density Bonus Housing Units (only if applicable) Should the Owner require additional assistance or have any questions regarding the above comment, please contact Stephen Acker, Senior Community Development Analyst at 831-758-7375 or via e-mail at [email protected].
Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137 City of Salinas
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SALINAS 65 W. Alisal Street, 2nd Floor • Salinas, California 93901 RICH IN LAND • RICH IN VALUES (831) 758-7387 • (831) 775-4258 (Fax) • www.ci.salinas.ca.us Affordable Housing Plan
Casentini Street Family Apartments
200 Casentini Street, Salinas, CA
Date: April 29, 2026
Project Description: Proposed development of a 100% affordable large family multi-family housing community with approximately 88 dwelling units on a 4.9-acre parcel. Residential program will include a tot-lot, sports court, dog run area, and a separate amenity/leasing building at the project frontage along Casentini Street. Project includes 89 garage parking stalls and 63open parking stalls for a total of 152 residential parking spaces. In addition, the proposed project will include a roughly 4,335 square foot day care center with separate entry, parking, and play areas for children from newborn to five (5) years of age. A total of 16 parking spaces will be provided for staff and parent loading area.
Entitlement App. Date: July 30, 2025
Project Address(es): 200 Casentini Street, Salinas, CA 93907 Project APN(s): 003-161-030-000
Owners): The Housing Authority of the County of Monterey, a California Public Corporation
Developer(s): Milestone Housing Group
Project Link To: Amendment to a Planned Unit Development Permit (92-006) - PUD 2025-003; Site Plan Review (SPR 2025-014); Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2025-025).
Affordability Restriction: 55 Year Affordability (Density Bonus) Inclusionary Option: N/A. Per Section 17-8(f) of the Inclusionary Ordinance, this project is exempt from the Inclusionary housing requirements as it is 100% affordable.
Inclusionary Restricted
Units: 0
Inclusionary
Restricted Unit Mix: Very Low Income
0 Low Income
Moderate
Exhibit E
Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137 Density Bonus Request: Yes
Density Bonus Restricted
Units: 87
Density Bonus
Restricted Unit Mix: 10 Extremely Low Income
53 Very Low Income
24 Low Income
Moderate
Density Bonus
Waivers Requested: 1. The project applicant is requesting a waiver of Article V; Division 2; Section 37-50.360; Table 37-50. 100 regarding required number of parking spaces per unit type. The project proposes a total of 88 units with 24 One-Bedroom Units, 24 Two-Bedroom Units, and 40 Three Bedroom Units. Per Table 37-50. 100 of the City of Salinas Zoning Code Section 37-50.360, based on our unit mix, our required number of parking spaces is 163 spaces. Per the table below, also tound in our Project Matrix on Sheet A1.0 of our Site Plan Review Application plan set, we are providing a total of 152 parking spaces. This reflects an eleven (11) stall deficit in the total required number of parking spaces.
2. The Project Applicant is requesting a waiver of Article XVIII - Regulating the Parking of Over-Size Vehicles under Section 20-18.020 prohibiting the ability to park vehicles exceeding 20 feet in length. Per Sheet A1.0: Site Plan, of our Site Plan Review Application plan set, our project data section reflects a total of 152 proposed parking stalls for our residential community. The table below shows the total number of parking stalls, the breakdown of parking stalls provided per unit type, and the breakdown of tandem parking stalls as part of the 152 total parking spaces provided. As such, of the 152 total parking spaces provided, there is a total of sixty-four (64) tandem parking spaces. This is separated as 40 tandem stalls in our parking garages within the residential buildings and another 24 tandem stalls in our surface parking areas.
3. Our proposed large family project at 200 Casentini Street is zoned for Residential High Density. Section 37-30.170 of the Zoning code under Table 37-30.80 requires that 10% of all dwelling units in our project include 4 or more bedrooms. As reflected above in our unit and AMI breakdown, our project includes a total of 87 apartment units. With the manager unit, we have a total of 88 units. This would require that we would include nine (9) 4-bedroom units. This requirement would require an adjustment to the building and unit design to reduce the number of 1bedroom, 2 bedroom, and 3-bedroom units to incorporate the 4- bedroom units. This adjustment to include 10% of the total unit count would result in a loss of 15 units (including the manager's unit) of much- needed affordable residential units
4. Waiver of usable open space per dwelling unit. Our proposed large Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137 family project at 200 Casentini Street is zoned for Residential High Density. Section 37-30.170 under Table 37-30.80 of the Zoning code Development Regulations requires that we provide a minimum of 500 square feet of usable open space per dwelling unit. Our project proposes 88 residential units which equate to a minimum of 44,000 Square Feet of required usable open space. Per Sheet A1.2 Common Open Space of our Site Plan Review Application Plan Set, our project is currently providing 27,305.93 square feet of usable open space.
Please see attached exhibit titled Density Bonus Application Other Affordable
Alternative: N/A
Project Units: The table below shows the unit distribution on the project.
UNIT % OF
UNIT TYPE NUMBER NUMBER OF SQUARE TOTAL
OF UNITS BEDROOMS BATHROOMS
FOOTAGE UNITS
Extremely Low 3 1 641 3.41%
1 3 2 1 838 3.41%
4 2 1008
3 4.55%
Very Low Income 16 1 1 641 18.18%
13 2 1 838 14.77%
3 2 899 3.41%
2 21 2 1008 23.68%
3 Low Income 5 1 1 641 5.68%
4 2 2 915 4.55%
11 3 2 1008 12.50%
4 3 2 983 4.55%
Median Income
Moderate Income
Workforce Income
Non-Restricted
Units 1 2 2 899 1.14%
TOTAL 100.00%
Unit Placement: Units offered to Inclusionary Housing participants shall represent an equitable distribution of unit types and bedroom mix in the overall Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137 Follow-up Items: Items to be completed prior to issuance of the Building Permit:
• Amended Affordable Housing Plan (only if project unit count or composition changes)
• Affordable Housing Agreement (Recorded Covenant)
Items to be completed prior to issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy (CofO):
• Marketing Plan
Management Plan
: Unit Income and Rent Limits (per the Densily Bonus Program) Signatures:
•DocuSigned by:
Marcus Griffin
4/29/2026 | 4:54 PM PDT
-C2BE408EC01A49D
Marcus Griffin Date
Authorized Owner/Project Representative
-Signed by:
Orlan do Reyes-Rodas 4/29/2026 | 5:44 PM PDT
-4D21317221AE402
Orlando Reyes-Rodas, Assistant Director Date
Community Development Department
Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137 Attachment A
Density Bonus Unit Placement Table
[Density Bonus units have to be evenly distributed among the different unit types in the project. If project is going to be developed in phases, please describe how this phased approach will impact the distribution and placement of units]
1 2 3 4
Location Income SRO Studio Total
Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom
Extremely 3 3 4 10
Phase I Very Low 16 16 21 53
Low 5 4 15 24
Median
Phase I Moderate
Workforce
Median
Phase III Moderate
Workforce
Median
Phase IV Moderate
Workforce
Median
Phase V Moderate
Workforce
Median
Phase VI Moderate
Workforce
Median
Phase VII| Moderate
Workforce
A-1
Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137 Attachment B
Density Bonus Unit Placement Map
[Insert Site Plan / Floorplan diagram indicating where the Density Bonus units will be located]
Exhibit A - AMI Plan on following pages.
B-1
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN ktgy
SANES, CAN STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP
COVER CHEST
VICINITY MAP
Contact: Mark Schattinger Contact: Kyle Christy, PE Contact: Keith Labus Contact: Aaron Barger Newport Beach, CA 92663 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Irvine, CA 92614 Los Gatos, CA 95030 507 30th Street, 1646 N Califomia Bivd, Suite 400 51 University Ave., Ste D 179Y Von Kaman Ave, Sie 200 Milestone Housing Group
MJS Landscaping BKF Engineers
Landscape Civil Architecture Owner/ Developer
Project Team:
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN
AMI PLAN
EXHIBIT A
4,59 AC (199,960 SF)
Dwelling Units 88 DU
Density 19.17 DU/AC
Aparment Buildings 1-5 121,240 SF
Amenity Building 6 2,400 SF
4 225 SE
3-Story Tuckunder, Hammerhead Existing Tree Canopy Property Line PARe Baking 7 0.64 Accessible
Affordable Walk Up Van Parking Turnaround
Apartments Building Plan Summary.
Pian Beds Unit Area Quansty % Total Net S.F. Avg. Not S.F.
Plan 1-1 27.3%
Plan 2-1 42%
Dian 2.2
Plan 2-3 a se
Plan 3-1 40.9%
Laundry Room, Plan 3-2 45%
Typical 100% 76.268
Existing Easement No. Units
Type
1Bed 27.3%
2Bed 27.3%
3Bed 45.5%
3-Story, Affordable Walk Up Total 100%
Apartment Building. Typical
Parking Summary
3 Unit Count (buy No. Spaces No. Single in Tandom»
Area SFI Spaces Provided Spaces Provided
Children.
Bidg. 1-5 Mult-Family
1 Bedroom 24 DU 1.0-
2 Bedroom 24 DU 1.5 - 48 (24 Open Pairs)
3 Bedroom 40 DU 1.5 • 80 (40 Garaço Prs.
FEMA Flood Line Total 152(1.7 spidu)
Bldg. 6 2,400 SF NA
Laundry Room, Leasing
Typical Daycare 40 Children 1Sp. / 6 Chider|
168
Single Story
7' Wide Sidewalk wl Day Care Building *State Desnity Bonus Parking Ratio Two Story at 3' Vehicular Overhang. **Tandem pairs are assigned to the largest units first. For example, 40 tandem garage pairs go to the 40 three- Hatch Area Typical Fence bedroom units, and are always assigned to specific units, never shared.
See L.5
Multi-Family Affordable Accessible Parking Calculations % Required*** 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom | 3 Bedroom
5% Required
Trash Enclosure, Typical Trash Enclosure. Total Required (1.6 -Van Inclusive of Total) 6 (1 Van) Basketball Court Typical % Required*** Remaining Parking Spaces 2% Required
Total Required (Van Inclusive of Total 2 (1 Van)
Accessible Van Parking Multi-Family Total Provided (Van Inclusive of Total) 8 (2 Van) Single Story Leasing and Daycare Accessible Parking Calculations Amenity Building Tot-Lot Total Rquired**** 1 (1 Van)
Daycare Total Provided (Van Inclusive of Total) 2 (1 Van) Colored, Textured ***Required Accessible Parking for Mobility Units per 11B-208.2.3.1 & 11B-208.2.3.2 Paving at Entry ****Required Accessible Parking for Daycare per Table 11B-208.2 Tol-Lot
Legend
Compact parking - Building Type
Transformer
CASENTINIST. Direction of Vehicle Travel • Building Number 120° 50,050.
Visibility Visibility Residential Retaining Day Care Drop-off Accessible Daycare Entry Triangle Triangle Project Entry Wall Van Parking
Tandem Standard
Parine Parking
Typical Parking Spaces | Scale r*=1-0° Bicycle parking provided: 12 CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS SCHEMATIC DESIGN SITE PLAN A1.0 388.456.5849 | kigy com MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP APRIL 28, 2026 ktgy 4o. 20240276 SALINAS, CA
Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137
CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS
UNIT MATRIX WITH AMI
No. of No. of BEDROOM TYPE AMI LEVEL No. of TOTAL AMI
BEDROOM TYPE AMI LEVEL BEDROOM TYPE AMI LEVEL Units
Units
1-BEDROOM 30.00% 2-BEDROOM 30.00% 3-BEDROOM 30.00% 30%
2-BEDROOM 40.00% 2-BEDROOM 40.00% 3-BEDROOM 40.00% 40%
1-BEDROOM 50.00% 2-BEDROOM 50.00% 12 3-BEDROOM 50.00% 50% 1-BEDROOM 60.00% 2-BEDROOM 60.00% 3-BEDROOM 60.00%
TOTAL TOTAL 47.39% TOTAL 50.25% 49%
47.92%
AMI AMI BLDG 3 BLDG 4 AMI BLDG 5 AMI
BLDG 1 BLDG2
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1 LEVEL1 LEVEL 1
PLAN 3-2 30.00% PLAN 1-1 30.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 30.00% PLAN 3-2 40.00% PLAN 1-1 40.00% PLAN 1-1 40.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 40.00% PLAN 2-2 50.00% PLAN 2-2 50.00% PLAN 2-2 50.00% PLAN 2-2 MNGR LEVEL 2 PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 3-1 PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 2-3 30.00%
PLAN 2-3 40.00% LEVEL 2 LEVEL2 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2
PLAN 3-2 50.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 30.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 60.00% PLAN 3-2 60.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 40.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 2-1 30.00% PLAN 2-1 50.00% PLAN 2-1 30.00% PLAN 2-1 50.00% PLAN 2-1 40.00% PLAN 2-1 40.00% PLAN 2-1 40.00% PLAN 2-1 50.00% LEVEL 3 30.00% PLAN 3-1 30.00%
PLAN 2-3 50.00% PLAN 3-1 40.00% PLAN 3-1 30.00% PLAN 3-1
60.00% PLAN 3-1 40.00% PLAN 3-1 40.00% PLAN 3-1 40.00% PLAN 3-1 40.00% PLAN 2-3 PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00% LEVEL 3 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 3
PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 50.00% PLAN 1-1 60.00% PLAN 1-1 60.00% PLAN 1-1 60.00% PLAN 1-1 60.00% PLAN 2-1 50.00% PLAN 2-1 50.00% PLAN 2-1 PLAN 2-1 50.00% PLAN 2-1 60.00% PLAN 2-1 60.00% PLAN 2-1 60.00% PLAN 2-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 3-1 60.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00%
50.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00% PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1
132-7
Plan 3-2 Plan 3-2
S0% AMI
BLDG 1 AMI
LEVEL 1
38-8* PLAN 3-2 30.00%
PLAN 3-2 40.00%
Plan 2-3 Plan 2-3
30% AMI 40% AM1 LEVEL 2
PLAN 2-3 30.00%
4:12 PLAN 2-3 40.00%
Level 2 PLAN 3-2 50.00%
PLAN 3-2 60.00%
LEVEL 3
PLAN 2-3 50.00%
PLAN 2-3 60.00%
132'-7"
Building 'A' - Area
Level 1 = 5,620 G.S.F.
Plan 3-2 Plan 3-2
Se Au 40% Aм1 Level 2 = 5,205 G.S.F.
Level 3 = 2,615 G.S.F.
38-8" Total = 13,440 G.S.F.
20:00 Min.
Level 1
BUILDING 1
. ! ! : SCHEMATIC DESIGN ELOOR PLANS A3.0
ktgy esese91kg.com MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SALMAS, INI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS tak se.тe FEBRUARY 19,2026 Roof Plan
Mech.Equipment - •
Screened by Roof
BLDG 1 AMI
LEVELA
PLAN 3-2 30.00%
PLAN 3-2 40.00%
LEVEL 2
PLAN 2:3 30.00%
PLAN 2-3 40.00%
PLAN 3-2 50.00%
PLAN 3-2 60.00%
Plan 2-3 Plan 2-3
60% AM 50% AM:
LEVEL3
PLAN 2-3 50.00%
Level 3 PLAN 2-3 60.00%
BUILDING 1
• ! :: - = SCHEMATA 1S104 FLOOR PLANS A3.1
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SANAS, CAL STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS BLDG A. 140'-1°
1 plan 2-1 Plan 2-1 Plan 3-1
15% AN BLDG 2 AMI
O% AMI
LEVEL1
PLAN 1-1 30.00%
PLAN 1-1 40.00%
PLAN 2-2 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
EVEL 2
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 30.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 3-1 PLAN 2-1 40.00%
Plan 1-11,
60% AMI 50% AMI PLAN 3-1 40.00%
PLAN 3-1 40.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
2-12
Level 2 LEVEL 3
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
148'-5" PLAN 1-1 60.00%
PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
Laundry PLAN 3-1 50.00%
Plan 2-2 Plan 1-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 3-1
Building 'B' - Area
50% AM 10% AVI 60% AMI
Level 1 + 9,778 G.S.F.
Level 2 * 8,586 G.S.F.
Level 3 = 8,586 G.S.F.
Total + 26.950 G.S.F.
„S:OL
Closet Utility
: 10-0";
Utility Closet
Level 1
BUILDING 2
SCHEMATIC DESIGN Floor Plans A3.2
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTIN STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 19,2026 BLDG. B Mass Cre I2 CPAIPBSCATSAAAICGA72 ATECH137
BUILDING 2
Mech.Equipment -
Screened by Roof
412
Roof
[BLDG 2
LEVEL 1
PLAN 1-1 30.00%
PLAN 1-1 40.00%
PLAN 2-2 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 2-1 Plan 2-1 Plan 3-1 LEVEL 2
OK AM 10X AM 50% AM1 60% AMI PLAN 1-1 50.00%
01- PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 30.00%
PLAN 2-1 40.00%
n1He01 PLAN 3-1 40.00%
PLAN 3-1 40.00%
39:80 PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
LEVEL3
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 3-1 PLAN 1-1 60.00%
50% AM1 PLAN 2-1 50.00%
CO% AMI 50% AMI
PLAN 2-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
Level 3 PLAN 3-1 50.00%
BUILDING 2
CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS BioGr Plans A3.3
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SCHEMATA TSIN
ktgy estag sea914g.com SALINAS. CA
1 plan 2-1 Plan 3-1 BLDG 3 AMI
Plan 3-1 Plan 2-1
SO% ASE
40% AMI EVEL 1
0% AME
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 1-1 40.00%
PLAN 2-2 50.00%
8 г0 PLAN 3-1 60.00%
LEVEL 2
88E PLAN 1-1 30.00%
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 40.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 1-1 L Plan 3-1 PLAN 3-1 30.00%
50% AMI 30% AM1 PLAN 3-1 40.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
3-12
Level 2 LEVEL 3
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 1-1 60.00%
PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
Plan 2-2 Plan 1. Plan 3-1
Building 'B' - Area
50% AMI 40% AMI 60% AM
Level 1 ‡ 9,778 G.S.F.
Level 2 = 8,586 G.S.F.
Level 3 * 8,586 G.S.F.
Foret
Total ÷ 26,950 G.S.F.
.9:0L
Closet
10-0"
Utility Closet
Level 1
BUILDING 3
SCHEMATIC DESIGN Floor Plans A3.2
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SANSEN STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 19, 2026 Mech.Equipment -
Screened by Roof
13 Roof
BLDG 3 AMI
LEVEL 1
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 1-1 40.00%
PLAN 2-2 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
1 plan 2.1 Plan 3-1
Plan 3-1 Plan 2-1
LEVEL 2
50% AMI
PLAN 1-1 30.00%
210 PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 40.00%
PLAN 3-1 30.00%
PLAN 3-1 40.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
LEVEL 3
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 3-1 PLAN 1-1 60.00%
50% AMI 60% AMI PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
Level 3 PLAN 3-1 50.00%
BUILDING 3
SCHEMATIC DESIGN Floor Plans A3.3
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CANASTNI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 19,2026 BLDG 4 AMI
50.00%
1 plan 2-1 Plan 2-11 Plan 3-1 PLAN 1-1 50.00%
30% AMI 50% AMI
WAV- 50.00%
50% AMI PLAN 2-2
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
LEVEL 2
.t-.L9 PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 1-1 40.00%
PLAN 2-1 30.00%
810 PLAN 2010 40.00%
PLAN 3-1 30.00%
PLAN 3-1 40.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 3-1 PLAN 3-1 60.00%
AN AM 1O% AN 1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1
LEVEL 3
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
Level 2 PLAN 1-1 60.00%
PLAN 2-1 50.00%
148'-5" PLAN 2-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
Plan 2-2 Plan 1-1 Plan 3-1 Building 'B' - Area
1 60% AMI
Level 1 + 9.778 G.S.F.
Level 2 * 8.586 G.S.F.
Level 3 * 8,586 G.S.F.
Total * 26.950 G.S.F.
-S-0L
Closet Utility
:0-98
Utility Closet
Level 1
BUILDING 4
CAUCHATIA DECIAN Sinar Plane A3.2
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CANASTEN STREET FAMILY APARMENTS we car, run FEBRUARY 19,2026 BLOG. B
Mech. Equipment - •
Screened by Roof
18 4:12
Roof
4:12
BLDG 4 AMI
LEVEL 1
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-2 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
LEVEL 2
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 2-1 Plan 2-1 40.00%
PLAN 1-1
PLAN 2-1 30.00%
PLAN 2-1 40.00%
PLAN 3-1 30.00%
8r0 PLAN 3-1 40.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
LEVEL 3
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 1-1 60.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 3-1
PLAN 2-1 50.00%
60% AMI 50% AMI
PLAN 2-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
Level 3 PLAN 3-1 50.00%
BUILDING 4
SCHEMATIC DESIGN Floor Plans A3.3
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SALNAS, ENI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS BLDG.B Mag CoAIA IO CYATUTCAT-AMAMCGAT ADEH97
BLDG 5 AMI
LEVEL 1
PLAN 1-1 30.00%
• Plan 2-1 Plan 2-1 Plan 3-1 PLAN 1-1 40.00%
Plan 3-1
50% AMI OS AM: PLAN 2-2 MNGR
10% AMI
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
18]
LEVEL 2
PLAN 1-1 60.00%
„t-29 PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 30.00%
PLAN 3-1 40.00%
Plan 3-1 PLAN 3-1 60.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 1-11
0% AM 50% AME PLAN 3-1 50.00%
LEVEL 3]
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 1-1 60.00%
Level 2 PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
Plan 2-2 1 Plan 1-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 3-1 Building 'B' - Area 10% AMI = 9,778 G.S.F.
Level 1
Level 2 * 8,586 G.S.F.
200 Level 3 * 8,586 G.S.F.
Total * 26,950 G.S.F.
.S-OL
Closet
:0-98
10'-0"
Utility Closet
Level 1
BUILDING 5
SCHEMATIC DESIGN Floor Plans A3.2
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SASENTIN STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS sode: 185 = 16r FEBRUARY 19,2026 g Cmdpa12 CMAITESCATAMAASCGA125A33CS197
Mech.Equipment -
Screened by Roof
Roof
BLDG 5
LEVEL1
PLAN 1-1 30.00%
PLAN 1-1 40.00%
PLAN 2-2 MNGR
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
LEVEL 2
PLAN 1-1 60.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 2-1 Plan 2-1 Plan 3-1 PLAN 1-1 50.00%
60% AMI 50% AME PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 30.00%
PLAN 3-1 40.00%
8 го PLAN 3-1 60.00%
-810 PLAN 3-1 50.00%
LEVEL 3
PLAN 1-1 50.00%
PLAN 1-1 60.00%
Plan 3-1 Plan 1-1 Plan 3-1 PLAN 2-1 50.00%
50% AMI 1 50% AM1 PLAN 2-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 60.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
PLAN 3-1 50.00%
Level 3
BUILDING 5
SCHEMATIC DESIGN Floor Plans A3.3
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS ktgy e2-458-528491 Kor.com AINAC AA scane seº - Ter FEBRUARY 19,2026 BLDG.B metro O CHAMAAAAAO 4249230
34'-0°
8:9%. *
46 SF
Master
0-6x12-0-
32-0* Room: 32'-0"
Bath
Dining/Kitchen Dining/Kitchen
Coat
UNIT TYPE P1-1 UNIT TYPE P2-1
1 BEOROOM /1 BATHROOM 2 BECROOM / 1 BATHROOM
+838 NET SF
641 NETS
743 GROSS SE +950 GROSS SF
36'-6"
36'-6"
9:9%5.*
52 SF 52 SF
10:8X10:3- 0-8x10-3-
10-2X10-3*
Living
Room
12-0°x10-0*
Room. WIC 32'-0* 32-0*
wic
Bath
-Master
= 12-0%11-0- Pedron
Dining/Kitchen Dining/Kitchen 12-0°x11-0*
M.Bath M.Bath
UNIT TYPE P2-2 UNIT TYPE P3-1
2 BEDROOM /2 BATHROOM 3 BEDROOM /2 BATHROOM
•100R NET SI
1899 NET SF
=1028 GROSS SF
SCHEMATIC DESIGN UNIT PLANS
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SALINAS, CAI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS . - Scale: 116°= 10 DP 28 2022 51'-8 1/2"
Deck 10-2X10:3-
7'-0"x7'-7"
53 SF
Master
12'-0°x13'-6"
12-6*12°6*
22'-10°
Dining/Kitchen
M.Bath-
9860x
J BOROOM E PTHROOM
1915 NET SF
*1015 GROSS SF
56'-8 1/2"
6.6%T- 10-2×10-3- 10-2X10 3)
50 SF
12073-00
22-10*
Dining/Kitchen
Bath~ M.Bath
Z ni 78800 210
H10 ROS SF
SCHEMATIC DESIGN UNIT PLANS
MILESTONE HOUSING GROUP SASEATEN STREET FAMILY APARTMENT ! . : ! sale tie s rer APRIL 28. 2028 Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137
DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION CONCESSION AND WAIVER REQUEST
CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS
Milestone Housing Group in partnership with the Monterey County Housing Authority proposes to develop a currently vacant parcel along Casentini Street as an affordable large family apartment community on a 4.9-acre site comprised of one parcel (APN: 003-161-030) with an address of 200 Casentini Street, Salinas, CA. The Monterey County Housing Authority is the current owner of the project property.
The project sponsor proposes to regrade the vacant property and construct a new 100% affordable multi-family residential apartment community and a new day care center. The residential community portion of the project will consist of five (5) new, 3-story apartment buildings and will include eighty-eight (88) apartment units with a mix of 1-bedroom, 2- bedroom, and 3-bedroom apartments. The residential community will also include a leasing/amenity building, a tot lot, and sport court, a dog park area, walking paths, and a mix of covered and surface parking spaces totaling 152 parking spaces.
There is a total of eighty-eight (88) residential apartment units, which includes 87 low income or subsidized housing units and one (1) Manager's Unit. The unit mix is broken down in the Table below and reflects twenty-four (24) one-bedroom units (27.3%), twenty-four (24) two-bedroom units (27.3%), and forty (40) three-bedroom units (45.4%). This unit mix allows for this project to be considered as a large family project. The project also includes a leasing/amenity building with indoor fitness, business/computer room, and a community room. Exterior amenities include a sport court with a basketball hoop for all residents of the project and a tot lot for children up to nine (9) years of age.
The Day Care Center, measuring roughly 4,335 square feet, will provide services to children from newborn age up to 5 years of age. The building will be divided into two classrooms with one room for children 0-24 months and the second classroom for children 24 months to 60 months. Each classroom will have their own secure outdoor play area. The building will include bathrooms, offices for staff, a breakroom, and a kitchen for meal preparation. The Daycare Center will have their own access into the property off Casentini Street and will include 16 parking spaces.
The project will be 100% affordable for households with income at or below 60% of Area Median Income (AMI). The Average AMI level for the project is roughly 49%. The breakdown of AMI levels, unit mix, and number of subsidized units are found in the Table below:
Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137
CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS
UNIT MIX AMI BREAK DOWN
BEDROOM TYPE AMI LEVEL NUMBER OF UNITS
1-BEDROOM 30.00% 3
1-BEDROOM 40.00% 4
1-BEDROOM 50.00%
1-BEDROOM 60.00% 5
2-BEDROOM 30.00% 3
2-BEDROOM 40.00% 4
2-BEDROOM 50.00% 12
2-BEDROOM 60.00% 4
3-BEDROOM 30.00% 4
3-BEDROOM 40.00% 6
3-BEDROOM 50.00% 15
3-BEDROOM 60.00% 15
TOTAL UNIT COUNT (SUBSIDIZED) 87
TOTAL UNIT COUNT AT 30% AMI
TOTAL UNIT COUNT AT 40% AMI 14
TOTAL UNIT COUNT AT 50% AMI 39
TOTAL UNIT COUNT AT 60% AMI 24
AVERAGE AMI LEVEL 49%
The project seeks on-going rental subsidies in the form of Project-Based Section 8 Vouchers from the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey in addition to tax exempt bond financing and low-income housing tax credits.
To develop the Casentini Street Family Apartments and provide necessary affordable housing to the community, the project requires incentives/concessions and/or waivers as allowed through the State Density Bonus Law. Currently, per our analysis of the City of Salinas Zoning Code, waivers required to allow for the development of the project include removing the restriction on tandem parking spaces, a waiver for not providing 4-bedroom units in our project design, and a waiver requesting a reduction in required open space. Below is a written explanation of the why this 100% affordable large family apartment community could not be developed without these requested waivers.
Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137 Waiver Request #l: Article V. Division 2. Parking, Loading, and Outdoor Lighting; Section 37-50.360. Off Street Parking and Loading Spaces Regulations Table 37-50.100:
The project applicant is requesting a waiver of Article V; Division 2; Section 37-50.360; Table 37-50.100 regarding required number of parking spaces per unit type. The project proposes a total of 88 units with 24 One-Bedroom Units, 24 Two-Bedroom Units, and 40 Three Bedroom Units. Per Table 37-50.100 of the City of Salinas Zoning Code Section 37-50.360, based on our unit mix, our required number of parking spaces is 164 spaces. Per the table below, also found in our Project Matrix on Sheet A1.0 of our Site Plan Review Application plan set, we are providing a total of 152 parking spaces. This reflects an eleven (11) stall deficit in the total required number of parking spaces.
Per the State Government Code under Title 7; Division 1; Chapter 4.3 Density Bonus and Other Incentives under Section 65915(p)(1) Law, we are allowed to use a parking ratio of 1 parking stall per every 1-Bedroom Unit, and 1.5 parking stalls per every 2 and 3-Bedroom unit without a requirement to apply for an additional waiver. As reflected in the table below, using the State Density Bonus Law related to parking ratios per bedroom type, our required parking would total 121 stalls. We are providing 152 parking spaces, which exceeds the parking requirements using State Density Bonus Law.
In the light of the above, we respectfully request that the State Density Bonus Law parking ratios be applied as part of our application. In addition, as part of our Waiver Request, if we are required to add eleven (11) parking stalls to meet the City parking requirements, we would be required to remove an entire building section, which would equate to losing four (4) stacks of units or a total of twelve (12) much-needed affordable housing units.
Parking Required | Total Parking
Parking Required Parking Required Parking Provided Total Parking Bedroom Type Number of Units Per State Density equired Per Sta per Unit Type Total Per Unit Type Provided
Bonus Law ensity Bonus Le
1-BEDROOM 1.5 4.5
1-BEDROOM 1.5 6
1-BEDROOM 12 1,5 18
1 1-BEDROOM 5 1.5 7.5
2-BEDROOM 2
2-BEDROOM
2-BEDROOM 2
2-BEDROOM 2
2-BEDROOM 2
3-BEDROOM 2
3-BEDROOM
3-BEDROOM
3BEDROOM 11
3 BEDROOM 1.5
MANAGER UNIT 2: 2
BEDROOM 1 2 2
TOTAL 88 1.86 164 1.37 121 152
Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137 Waiver Request #2: Section 20-18.020 - Prohibition of Oversized Vehicle Parking (Tandem Parking Stalls):
The Project Applicant is requesting a waiver of Article XVIII - Regulating the Parking of Over- Size Vehicles under Section 20-18.020 prohibiting the ability to park vehicles exceeding 20 feet in length. Per Sheet A1.0: Site Plan, of our Site Plan Review Application plan set, our project data section reflects a total of 152 proposed parking stalls for our residential community. The table below reflects the total number of parking stalls, the breakdown of parking stalls provided per unit type, and the breakdown of tandem parking stalls as part of the 152 total parking spaces provided. As such, of the 152 total parking spaces provided, there is a total of sixty-four (64) tandem parking spaces. This is separated as 40 tandem stalls in our parking garages within the residential buildings and another 24 tandem stalls in our surface parking areas.
In review of our project plan and building layout, losing 64 parking spaces would have a significant impact on the number of affordable units provided in the project. Based on calculating the current number of parking spaces provided and removing the 64 tandem spaces, it leaves the project with a total of 91 parking spaces. Based on the parking ratio of what is provided at 1.73 stalls per unit, we would lose roughly 35 much-needed affordable residential units.
CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS
PARKING BREAKDOWN
PARKING TYPE TANDEM SPACES YOTAL SPACES
TANDEM GARAGE 40 80
TANDEM OPEN STALL 24 4B
SINGLE GARAGE
OPEN SPACE - SINGLE
TOTAL UNIT COUNT (SUBSIDIZED) 64 152
Parking Required Total Parking Parking Provided Total Parking Parking Required Parking Required
Bedroom Type Number of Units Per State Density Required Per State per Unit Type Total Per Unit Type Provide
Bonus Law Density Bonus Law
1-BEOROOM 15
1-8EOROOM 15
-- - -
1-BEOROOM 12 1.5
1-BFOROOM 5 1.5
2-BEOROOM 2
2-BEOROOM m<|o 2
2-BEOROOM
2-BEDROOM N N~
2-BEOROOM
B-BEOROOM
3-BEOROOM 2
3-8EDROOM 15
B-BEDROOM 11 ~~
3-BEDROOM 2
MANAGER UNIT • 2
1 2 2
BEDROOM
TOTAL BB 1.86 164 1.37 121 1.73 152
Docusign Envelope ID: DFA1FFB7-EA77-8A64-80CC-872FA70E5137 Waiver Request #3: Section 37-30.170; Table 37-30.80 - Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit (Percent of total dwelling units):
Our proposed large family project at 200 Casentini Street is zoned for Residential High Density.
Section 37-30.170 of the Zoning code under Table 37-30.80 requires that 10% of all dwelling units in our project include 4 or more bedrooms. As reflected above in our unit and AMI breakdown, our project includes a total of 87 apartment units. With the manager unit, we have a total of 88 units. This would require that we would include nine (9) 4-bedroom units. This requirement would require an adjustment to the building and unit design to reduce the number of Ibedroom, 2 bedroom, and 3-bedroom units to incorporate the 4-bedroom units. This adjustment to include 10% of the total unit count would result in a loss of 15 units (including the manager's unit) of much-needed affordable residential units
Waiver Request #4: Section 37-30.170; Table 37-30.80 - Usable Open Space Area per Dwelling Unit - Minimum:
Our proposed large family project at 200 Casentini Street is zoned for Residential High Density.
Section 37-30.170 under Table 37-30.80 of the Zoning code Development Regulations requires that we provide a minimum of 500 square feet of usable open space per dwelling unit. Our project proposes 88 residential units which equate to a minimum of 44,000 Square Feet of required usable open space. Per Sheet A1.2 Common Open Space of our Site Plan Review Application Plan Set, our project is currently providing 27,305.93 square feet of usable open space.
Our Open Space exhibit reflects six (6) Open Space areas where our calculation derives from.
Although there is a substantial amount of excess land on our 4.9-acre parcel, a large area of the site has slopes greater than a 10% slope and cannot be considered for usable open space. The Usable Open Space being provided, 27,306, equates to roughly 310 square feet per unit or a deficiency of roughly 190 square feet per unit. In order for our project to increase our usable open space, we need to reduce our residential building area by 16,694 square feet. Our current residential building area is roughly 121,240 square feet or roughly 1,378 square feet per unit (gross). Reducing the building area by roughly 17,000 square feet, our unit count would reduce from 88 units down to 75 units. Without our requested waiver for this development regulation, the project would lose roughly 13 much-need affordable residential units.
If City Staff would like additional information related to this Waiver Request and analysis stated above, please contact Aaron Barger at [email protected] or at 408-640-1100 to discuss further.
REPUBLIC
SERVICES
Sustainability in Action
February 20, 2026.
Aaron Barger
Casentini Street Family Apartment Project
Development Project Manager
RE: Site Plan Review Enclosure Designs
Casentini Street Family Apartment Project
Dear Aaron Barger,
Pursuant to your request and the requirements of the City of Salinas I have reviewed the site plan and the proposed enclosure characteristics of the aforementioned project.
The enclosure design specifications indicate that accommodations have been made for both recycling and trash containers at the above mentioned location.
Inasmuch as there will be no additional operational impact, the service requirements of Republic and the City of Salinas appear to have been met.
Chris Nottenkamper
Operations Manager
Republic Services of Salinas, CA.
1120 Madison Ln
Salinas, CA. 93907.
C 707 364-1620
E [email protected]
1120 Madison Lane, Salinas, CA 93907 | RepublicServices.com |/ Environmental Services, Recycling & Waste Exhibit I
Harris & Associates
November 24, 2025
Aaron Barger
Milestone Housing Group
51 University Avenue, Suite D
Los Gatos, California 95030
Subject: Aquatic Resources Constraints Letter Report for the Casentini Street Family Apartments Project Dear Mr. Barger,
On October 29, 2025, Harris & Associates (Harris) conducted a biological and aquatic resources field reconnaissance survey of the Casentini Street Family Apartments Project (project) site and a 100-foot buffer (approximately 10.21 acres in total), together referred to as the survey area. The purpose of this letter report is to provide the results of an aquatic resources delineation for the City of Salinas (City) to evaluate the appropriate setbacks areas from any potential off-site aquatic resources. This letter report includes an assessment of the need for 100-foot setbacks from any existing aquatic resources, or lack thereof, pursuant to Salinas City Code, Chapter 37, Article V, Division 1, Section 37-50.180(h), Ecological and Biological Resources (City of Salinas 2025). Under the Salinas City Code, activities may be considered within the setback area if the City determines the encroachment to be minor.
Project Location and Description
The project site is in the City of Salinas in Monterey County (County), California, within Assessor's Parcel Number 003-161-030-000 (Attachment 1, Figures; Figure 1, Regional Location, and Figure 2, Project Location). The project site is a vacant lot bordered by Casentini Street to the south and high-density residential development to the west, north, and east. The survey area is within the City's existing boundary and is surrounded by development, as depicted on Figure LU-1 of the City's General Plan Land Use Element, and is in a Residential High Density (R-H-2.1) Zoning District (City of Salinas 2002).
The project involves constructing a 100 percent affordable large-family and multi-family housing community with approximately 88 dwelling units and a child daycare center on a 4.9-acre undeveloped parcel. The project will consist of two housing buildings, a daycare building, an amenity building, landscaping, two entrances/exits onto Casentini Street, and parking.
Environmental Setting
Land Use
The project site is on a gently sloping, flat parcel of undeveloped land that is currently maintained by mowing and disking. Historically, the site has remained undeveloped for residential purposes. A review of historical aerial imagery indicates that the site has been consistently mowed and disked, has remained undeveloped, and has not supported any permanent structures or residential development thus far (Google Earth 2025). It is surrounded by residential development immediately to the west, northwest, and south/southwest, with a tennis court and urban landscapes to the north. Natividad Creek borders the survey area to the east, with residential development surrounding the survey area farther out on all sides.
Topography and Soils
The survey area is generally flat, with a slight decrease in elevation moving south, where it borders Casentini Street. In the southeastern corner, where the survey area borders a concrete canal, the elevation drops sharply.
Exhibit J:
60 W. Alisal Street, Suite 200, Salinas, CA 93901 • p: 831.789.8670 • f: 866| Harris & Associates
Elevations within the survey area range from approximately 35 to 64 feet above mean sea level (Figure 3, USGS Topographic Map). The U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service soil series search results for the project site included four soils (USDA 2019) (Figure 4, Soils). A description of each soil series is provided below:
• Antioch Very Fine Sandy Loam. Antioch series soils consist of fine-textured, moderately well-drained soils that formed on alluvial fans and floodplains in California at elevations ranging from near sea level to 1,100 feet above mean sea level. They are typically light brownish-gray and brown and found on slopes. This soil is found in the southwestern portion of the survey area.
• Clear Lake Clay, Sandy Substratum, Drained. Clear Lake series soils consist of very deep, poorly drained soils that formed in fine-textured alluvium derived from mixed rock sources on slopes ranging from zero to 5 percent. This soil occurs in the eastern portion of the survey area. • Cropley Silty Clay. Cropley series soils consist of very deep, moderately well- and well-drained soils that formed in alluvium from mixed rock sources on slopes ranging from zero to 15 percent. This soil occurs on the western portion of the survey area.
Diablo Clay. Diablo series soils consist of fine, smectitic, Aridic Haploxererts, usually found on slopes higher than 9 percent. This series is throughout Central California on steep slopes at elevations ranging from near sea level to 3,000 feet above mean sea level (USDA 2019). This soil occurs in the central portion of the survey area.
Hydrology
The survey area is in the greater Monterey Bay Watershed (Hydrologic unit 18060015) and the Alisal Slough- Tembladero Slough Subwatershed (Hydrologic Unit 180600150103). The Monterey Bay Watershed is located primarily in Monterey and Santa Cruz Counties and encompasses drainages that flow directly into the Monterey Bay and the Pacific Ocean. The Alisal Slough-Tembladero Slough Subwatershed drains approximately 144 square kilometers of area west to the Pacific Ocean via the Tembladero Slough (USEPA 2025).
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Wetlands Mapper and National Hydrography Dataset results identified one aquatic feature that is within the survey area, outside the project footprint, but within the survey area (Figure 5, Hydrology). Natividad Creek is identified as an intermittent, excavated, seasonally flooded riverine feature by the NWI (USFWS 2025). Natividad Creek flows from north to south through the 100-foot survey buffer east of the project footprint. This section of the creek is highly modified, having been channelized into an open, cement-lined ditch for stormwater and flood control.
During the October 2025 site visit, three aquatic features were observed in and near the survey area: Natividad Creek and two short, unnamed unvegetated channels that flow directly into Natividad Creek. None of the three aquatic features occur within the project site boundary. Two off-site cement-lined v-ditches occur east of the project site and drain rainwater from uplands west to Natividad Creek. Natividad Creek runs just east of the project site boundary, flowing south through a concrete channel before joining an earthen canal that flows west by way of numerous irrigation and flood control ditches and eventually empties into the Pacific Ocean, which is defined as traditional navigable water (TNW) by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
Further discussion on potentially jurisdictional aquatic resources is provided in the Aquatic Resources Delineation section in the Results section.
Climate
The survey area is in Monterey County. On a regional level, the County has a Mediterranean climate, which is characterized by wet winters and dry summers. This is largely because of a Semi-Permanent High-Pressure Zone that sits over the Pacific Ocean during much of the year and forms a fog belt (marine layer). The project site is generally within the Peninsular Ranges of Central California. The generalized climate in the region is dry, subhumid mesothermal, which pushes the growing season to the wet months of the year (late winter to early spring). The rainy season in the County typically lasts from November through March. Vegetation often goes dormant during the late summer months until the first rain in the fall. 2 Harris & Associates
According to historical data from the weather station at the Salinas Municipal Airport, approximately 2.6 miles southeast of the survey area, the average maximum annual temperature for the area surrounding the survey area is 68.4 degrees Fahrenheit (°F), and the average minimum temperature is 47.3°F. Average annual precipitation in the area is 14.54 inches (WRCC 2025).
Methods
This biological and aquatic resources analysis includes the results of a database review and biological resources survey, which document the existing biological conditions of the survey area. The results of the database review provide information on permitting requirements and potential constraints to project construction due to the presence (or lack thereof) of sensitive biological and aquatic resources.
Database Review
Prior to conducting fieldwork, a Harris biologist referenced the following materials:
• Topographic maps
• Aerial imagery (Google Earth from 1994 to 2025)
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service NWI Online Wetland Mapper (USFWS 2025) • U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (USDA 2019) Aquatic Resources Delineation
A Harris biologist conducted an aquatic resources delineation on October 29, 2025, using the routine on-site determination method described in the USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual (USACE 1987), the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (USACE 2008), and the National Ordinary High Water Mark Field Delineation Manual for Rivers and Streams: Final Version (USACE 2025a).
Plant species names and wetland indicator statuses follow the most recent iteration of the National Wetland Plant List (Attachment 2, Observed Plant Species List; USACE 2025b). The Harris biologist conducted the aquatic resources delineation fieldwork to identify aquatic resources within the survey area, including ordinary high water mark indicators and data applicable to a concrete-lined ditch, as well as prepared a USACE three-parameter wetland determination datasheet for the Arid West Region (wetland determination datasheet) at a representative point in the southeastern portion of the survey area, which sits at a lower grade than the surrounding land (Attachment 3, Datasheets).
Survey Limitations
Plants were identified by direct observation. However, the site visit was conducted at the end of the growing season, when some plant species were not evident or identifiable. Further, the site is regularly maintained through mowing, further reducing the potential for identification. Therefore, the list of observed plant species is not necessarily comprehensive.
Results
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Four vegetation communities and land cover types were observed in the survey area: unvegetated channel, coast live oak woodland, disturbed (ruderal) habitat, and urban/developed land (Figure 6, Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types; Table 1, Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types in the Survey Area (Holland 1986).
One vegetation community associated with aquatic resources in the survey area-unvegetated channel—is described in the following section.
3 Harris & Associates
Table 1. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types in the Survey Area Vegetation Community and Land Cover Type Project Site (acres) Survey Buffer (acres) Survey Area (acres) Aquatic
Unvegetated Channel 0.14 0.14
Subtotal 0.14 0.14
Upland
Coast Live Oak Woodland 0.05 0.42 0.47
Subtotal 0.05 0.42 0.47
Disturbed (Ruderal) Habitat/Developed Lands
Disturbed (Ruderal) Habitat 4.32 0 4.32
Urban/Developed Land 5.28 3.60
Subtotal 4.32 5.28 7.92
Total 4.37 5.84 10.21
Notes:
1 Acreages are approximate and based on ArcIS Collector data. Values are rounded up to one-hundredth of an acre.
Aquatic Vegetation Communities
Unvegetated Channel
Approximately 0.14 acre of unvegetated channel occurs in the 100-foot survey buffer, all within the eastern portion of the survey area (Figure 6). Three concrete-lined channels occur in the survey buffer, outside the project site boundary: Natividad Creek and two v-ditches. These features are discussed further in the following Aquatic Resources Delineation section.
Upland Vegetation Communities
Coast Live Oak Woodland
Remnant coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) woodland occurs along the northern edge of the survey area, along with isolated coast live oak trees within the survey area. Approximately 0.05 acre of coast live oak woodland occurs on the project site, with an additional 0.42 acre within the 100-foot survey buffer. The overstory of this vegetation community is dominated by coast live oak. The understory consists primarily of non-native grassland similar to the disturbed/ruderal grassland elsewhere in the survey area, as described below.
Disturbed (Ruderal) Habitat/Developed Lands
Disturbed (Ruderal) Habitat
Disturbed or ruderal vegetation communities are generally dominated by non-native vegetation of various densities. In the survey area, disturbed habitat consists of approximately 4.32 acres of ruderal grassland maintained by mechanical means (regular mowing). Dominant species in the ruderal grassland include wild oat (Avena fatua), Harding grass (Phalaris aquatica), and field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). An isolated arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis) occurs in the eastern portion of this vegetation community.
Urban/Developed Land
Urban/developed land cover type encompasses anthropogenic development, including buildings, roadways, structures, and associated hardscaping and manicured landscaping. Within the survey area, urban/developed land includes buildings, paved roadways, parking lots, tennis courts, and manicured lawns. No urban/developed land occurs on the project site, but approximately 5.28 acres occur within the 100-foot survey buffer. Vegetation in this land cover type is typically absent or manicured and artificially irrigated plantings. 4 Harris & Associates
Aquatic Resources Delineation
During the October 2025 site visit, data was collected from one representative data point and three drainage ditches within the survey area. The representative data point was collected from a low area in the southeastern corner of the survey area, where the vegetation community changes slightly from the surrounding ruderal grassland. Curly dock (Rumex crispus) is co-dominant in this area, indicating more moisture is likely present in the soil. Investigation of plants, soils, and hydrology indicated that this area does not pond water for sufficient lengths of time to sustain hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, or wetland hydrology (refer to Attachment 3 and Attachment 4, Photographic Log). Thus, no wetlands were observed on site.
Three aquatic resources were identified in the survey area, east of the project site: Natividad Creek and two unnamed unvegetated channels that drain rainwater runoff into the cement-lined channel of Natividad Creek (Figure 7, Aquatic Resources, and Figure 8, Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and State). None of the three aquatic resources occur within the project site boundary.
Natividad Creek
Natividad Creek is approximately 9 feet wide at the ordinary high water mark and 14 feet wide at the top of bank, which is just above the cement-lined portion of the drainage. Approximately 8 inches of slow-flowing water was within the concrete channel at the time of the October 2025 survey. The channel contained sporadic cattail (Typha spp.); however, piles of mud and dried cattails found adjacent to the creek indicate that the channel is regularly dredged for stormwater control to prevent sediment buildup and vegetation from establishing for long periods of time. Natividad Creek is identified as an intermittent, excavated, seasonally flooded riverine feature by the NWI and has a documented downstream connection to the Pacific Ocean, a traditional navigable water as defined by the USACE, via a series of constructed irrigation canals (USACE 2025a). Therefore, Natividad Creek is likely under the jurisdiction of the USACE pursuant to the Clean Water Act, Section 404. This creek is also likely a water of the state and would be considered jurisdictional pursuant to the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act and California Fish and Game Code, Section 1602.
Unvegetated Ditch
Two unvegetated, cement-lined v-ditches in the eastern portion of the survey area are approximately 85 feet long and drain west into Natividad Creek. These ditches direct water from urban landscaping east of the survey area into Natividad Creek. The ditches are not identified in the NWI, and no water was flowing in either ditch during the October 2025 site visit, indicating that these channels likely do not contain water outside the rainy season.
Due to the developed and ephemeral nature of these ditches and because they were excavated in uplands and only channel rainwater runoff from uplands, the unvegetated ditches are not likely under the jurisdiction of the USACE pursuant to the Clean Water Act, Section 404. They may be jurisdictional as waters of the state pursuant to the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act and the California Fish and Game Code, Section 1602.
Plant Species
Attachment 2 lists the vascular plant species observed in the survey area during the site visit. A total of 15 plant species were identified in the survey area, six (40 percent) of which were native and nine (60 percent) of which were non-native. No sensitive plant species were identified in the survey area during the October 2025 site visit.
Project Impacts
No impacts to aquatic resources are anticipated because no aquatic resources are on site. The cement-lined channel of Natividad Creek is not within the project footprint, and no direct or indirect impacts are anticipated because of project development.
Constraints Analysis Conclusion
The survey area, including the project site and survey buffer, is either already developed or regularly maintained through mechanical means. The drainage east of the project site is an excavated, cement-lined canal that provides 5 Harris & Associates
neither high-quality aquatic habitat for wildlife nor riparian habitat for local wildlife shelter or movement. The two cement-lined v-ditches were excavated in uplands and drain uplands.
Based on the conditions of Natividad Creek adjacent to the project footprint, a 100-foot setback is not necessary.
The channel is cement-lined and does not have any associated riparian habitat, thereby reducing the functions and values of the channel as a natural waterway or wildlife migration corridor. Implementation of appropriate best management practices during project development will be sufficient to prevent sedimentation or water runoff into Natividad Creek during construction. No direct or indirect impacts to aquatic resources are anticipated as a result of project development, and no further analysis or aquatic resources permitting is recommended.
Preparers
Harris & Associates
Will Lawton, Biologist, Author
Laura Burris, Principal Biologist, Senior Review
If you have any questions regarding this letter report, please contact me at (916) 835-9671 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Laura Burrit
Laura Burris
Principal Biologist
Attachments
1, Figures
2, Observed Plant Species List
3, Datasheets
4, Photographic Log
References
City of Salinas. 2002. City of Salinas General Plan. September. Accessed November 2025. https://www.salinas.gov/files/sharedassets/city/v/1/residents/documents/generalplan.pdf.
City of Salinas. 2025. "Section 37-50.180(h): Ecological and Biological Resources." In Salinas City Code. Accessed November 2025. https://library.municode.com/ca/salinas/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeld=PTIITHCO _CH37ZO_ARTVSUREAPALDI_DIV1SPREAPALDI_S37-50.180PEST#:~:text=Ecological%20and%20Biological %20Resources.
Google Earth. 2025. "Google Earth." Accessed November 2025. https://www.google.com/earth/.
Holland, Robert F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. California Department of Fish and Game. October. Accessed November 2025. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov /content/dam/sdc/pds/ceqa/JVR/AdminRecord/IncorporatedByReference/Appendices/Appendix---- Groundwater-Investigation-Report/Holland_1986.pdf.pdf.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Final report.
Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y 87 1 (online edition). Prepared by Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station. Wetlands Research Program.
January. Accessed November 2025. http://www.cpe.rutgers.edu/Wetlands/1987-Army-Corps-Wetlands- Delineation-Manual.pdf.
6 Harris & Associates
USACE. 2008. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0). Final report. ERDC/EL TR-08-28. Prepared by Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program. September. Accessed November 2025. https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p266001coll1/id/7627.
USACE. 2025a. National Ordinary High Water Mark Field Delineation Manual for Rivers and Streams. Final Version. ERDC/CRREL TR-25-1. Prepared by Gabrielle C. L. David, Ken M. Fritz, Tracie-Lynn Nadeau, Brian J. Topping, Aaron O. Allen, Patrick H. Trier, Steven L. Kichefski, L. Allan James, Ellen Wohl, and Daniel Hamill. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. January. Accessed November 2025. https://erdc-library.erdc.dren.mil/items/76c61f8-6d75- 4a35-aaf3-39aa64918afb.
USACE. 2025b. National Wetland Plant List. Accessed November 2025. https://nwpl.sec.usace.army.mil/.
USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2019.Web Soil Survey. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Survey Staff. Last modified July 31. Accessed November 2025. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov /App/HomePage.htm.
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2025. WATERS GeoViewer. Last updated August 7. Accessed November 2025. https://www.epa.gov/waterdata/waters-geoviewer.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2025. National Wetlands Inventory Wetlands Mapper. Accessed November 2025. https://www.fws.gov/program/national-wetlands-inventory/wetlands-mapper.
WRCC (Western Regional Climate Center). 2025. "Salinas, California (047668)." Accessed November 2025. https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca7668.
Harris & Associates
This page intentionally left blank.
Attachment 1. Figures
This page intentionally left blank.
Palo Ato 7 Cupertino
Er 03 Campbel
Saratoga 7 San Jose
3 Cambrian Park
San Mateo County® Los, Gatos (
Santa Cruz Cotinty
Lexington Hills...
Boukler Creek
*Ben Lomond
Santa Cruz County Santa Clara County
Day Valley
Soquel, Aptos
Corralitos
Santa Cruz! Capitola
(Opal Ciffs Rio del Mar
Freedom Intertaken
Las Loma:
San Juan: Bautista.
Pacific O C e a n /Elkhom Monterey County San Benito County Marina
Sand City
Pacific Grove Seaside
Project Site
Monterey Delf
Del Monte Fogast.-
Carmel by-the-Sea
Carmel Valley Village
I Soledad-
Greet
Kíng cly
City of Salinas
Population Centers
Source: ESRI, 2023.
10 Figure 1
Harris & Associates Regional Location
Miles
Casentini Street Family Apartments Project
Larkin St
2101
Bush St
Rico St
Casentini St
Sansome St
Greenwich Way
Stanyan St
Project Site
100-Foot Survey Buffer
Source: ESRI, 2023.
100 200 Figure 2
Harris & Associates A Project Location
Feet
Casentini Street Family Apartments Project
Sch
Athletic
californian odeo Grounds
x62
Sherwool
Park #
SALINÁS
JANAL
MAIN
46 Drive-in
Theater
OPK
183
Centra
Park
BM 53 Project Site
100-Foot Survey Buffer
Source: USGS &. 5 Minute Salinas Quadrangle, 1984.
500 1,000 Figure 3
Harris & Associates USGS Topographic Map
Feet
Casentini Street Family Apartments Project
101
Bush St 1022
Rico St
Casentini St
Project Site
100-Foot Survey Buffer
Soils
Antioch Very Fine Sandy Loam
Clear Lake Clay, Sandy Substratum, Drained
Cropley Silty Clay
Sansome St*
Diablo Clay
Source: ESRI, 2023.
0 100 200 Figure 4
Harris & Associates A Soils
Feet
Casentini Street Family Apartments Project
Larkin St
101)
Bush St
Rico St
Casentini St
Sansome St
Greenwich Way vich
Project Site
100-Foot Survey Buffer
Aquatic Resource Type
Stanyan St
Riverine
NHD Flowlines
Source: USGS National Hydrography Dataset, 2025; USFWS, 2025; Maxar Imagery, 2023.
N 0 100 200 Figure 5
Harris & Associates A Hydrology
Feet
Casentini Street Family Apartments Project
101
Bush St
Rico St
Casentini St
Project Site
100-Foot Survey Buffer
Vegetation Communities
and Land Cover Types
Coast Live Oak Woodland
Disturbed (Ruderal) Habitat
Sansome St
Unvegetated Channel
Urban/Developed Land
Urban/Developed Land
(Maintained Short Grass)
Source: ESRI, 2023.
150 Figure 6
Harris & Associates Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types Feet
Casentini Street Family Apartments Project
101
Bush St
Rico St
AF-1
Casentini St
Sansome St Project Site
100-Foot Survey Buffer
Aquatic Resources
) Unvegetated Channel
Source: ESRI, 2023.
150 Figure 7
Harris & Associates A Aquatic Resources
Feet
Casentini Street Family Apartments Project
Harris & Associates
Bush St
Figure 8
/101
Potential Jurisdictional Waters
of the U.S. and State for the
Casentini Street Family Apartments Project
Legend
Project Site
Rico St
100-Foot Survey Buffer
36.6877, -121.6565 • Reference Points
• Aquatic Resource Point
Aquatic Resources
Natividad Creek (0.12 acres)
Cement-Lined Ditch (0.3 acres)
AF-1
100 200
36.6865, -121.6584
Feet
Casenthi St
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 California State Plane Zone 6 Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
Verticel Datum: No Coordinate System
1 inch - 200 reel
Created on November 3rd, 2025
Revised on November 18th, 2025
Made in accordance wih the Updsted Map and Drawing Standards Sansome St for the South Pacific Division Regulatory Program, as amended or February 10, 2016, by: Jason Deters, Project Manager Enforcement and Sacramento District, Regulatory Division
1325J Street, Room 1350
Sacramento Calfornia 95814-2922
Attachment 2. Observed Plant Species List
This page intentionally left blank.
Scientific Name Common Name Special Status
EUDICOTS
Asteraceae - Sunflower family
* Helminthotheca echioides Bristly ox-tongue
* Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce
* Sonchus sp. Sowthistle
Brassicaceae - Mustard family
* Hirschfeldia incana Shortpod mustard
Convolvulaceae - Morning-glory f
Convolvulus arvensis Bindweed, orchard morning-glory
Fabaceae - Legume family
Acmispon junceus Rush lotus
Fagaceae - Oak family
Quercus agrifolia Coast live oak
Juglandaceae - Walnut family
Juglans hindsii Northern California black walnut
Malvaceae - Mallow family
Malvella leprosa Alkali mallow
Polygonaceae - Buckwheat famil
* Rumex crispus Curly dock
Salicaceae - Willow family
Salix lasiolepis Arroyo willow
MONOCOTS
Poaceae - Grass family
* Avena fatua Wild oat
Bromus carinatus California brome
* Phalaris aquatica Harding grass
Typhaceae - Cattail family
* Typha angustifolia Narrow-leaved cattail
Scientific Name Common Name Special Status
Legend
*= Non-native or invasive species
Special Status:
Federal:
FE = Endangered
FT = Threatened
State:
SE = Endangered
ST =Threatened
CRPR - California Rare Plant Rank
1A. Presumed extinct in California and elsewhere
3. Plants for which we need more information - Review list
4. Plants of limited distribution - Watch list
Threat Ranks
.1 - Seriously endangered in California
2 - Fairly endangered in California
3 - Not verv endangered in California
Attachment 3. Datasheets
This page intentionally left blank.
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: Casentini Street Appartments City/County: Salinas, Monterey Co. Sampling Date: 10/29/2025 Applicant/Owner: City of Salinas State: _ CA Sampling Point: AF-1 Investigators): Will Lawton Section, Township, Range: Township 14 South, Range 3 East Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): _ 1 Subregion (LRR): LLR C, Central California Coastal Vally Lat: 36.686412 Long: -121.6571143 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Clear Lake Clay, Sandy Substratum, Drained NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes_V No Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No. Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland?
Yes No-
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Project site is at the base of a hill that is frequently mowed, but the site itself appears to be maintained less frequently, as vegetation reached at least 3 feet high throughout. The sample point was taken at the low point below the steep hill that comprises the majority of the site, but the sample point is still located on a slight slope that leads to a concrete channel with slowly flowing approximately 20 feet away.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 % Cover Species? Status lumber of Dominant Specie
1. None hat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)
2. - Total Number of Dominant
3.- Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4. Percent of Dominant Species
= Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (AVB)
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. None Prevalence Index worksheet:
2. Total% Cover of: Multiply by:
3. OBL species × 1 =
4. - FACW species x2=
5. FAC species 62 x 3= 186
= Total Cover FACU species 44 x4= 176
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 × 5= 20
UPL species 4
1. Rumen crispus FAC Column Totals: 110 (A) 382 (B)
2. Convolvulus arvensis FACU
3. Helminthotheca echiodes FAC Prevalence Index = B/A= 3.47
4. Malvella leprosa 44771211 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
5. Acmispon junceus FAC _ Dominance Test is >50%
6. Phalaris aquatica FACU Prevalence Index is ≤3.0'
7. Lactuca serriola FACU - Mora in kamals or on separate senting
8. Hirschfeldia Incana 4 No UPL
110 _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
_= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: _ 15
1. None be present unes island or protesticey must
2. = Total Cover Hydrophytic
Vegetation
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 20 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes- No u Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: AF-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks 14 7.5YR 3/1 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils?:
- Histosol (A1) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C)
Histic Epipedon (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V
Remarks:
Soil uniform throughout profile.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) - Drainage Patterns (B10) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) - _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No _ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No. Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No. Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No V (includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Deep soil cracks (2+ inches deep) present, but are not hydrologically significant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Arid West - Version 2.0
Attachment 4. Photographic Log
This page intentionally left blank.
Photograph 1: (36.686279, - 121.656684) AR-01 flowing just east of the project SITE, with a cement-lined v-ditch on the right-hand side of the photo. View facing north.
Photograph 2: (36.686279, - 121.656684) View of the eastern portion of the project site with AR-01 in the foreground. View facing northwest.
Biological and Aquatic Resources Constraints 4-1 November 2025 Casentini Street Family Apartments Project
Photograph 3: (36.687023, -121.657468) Typical view of the project site with maintained non-native grassland vegetation cover. View looking north.
Photograph 4: (36.686362, - 121.656581) Cement-lined V-ditch that drains uplands west towards AR-01. View facing east.
Biological and Aquatic Resources Constraints 4-2 November 2025 Casentini Street Family Apartments Project
North AB 2097 Vicinity Map
Lutheran Church
o1 Ine G000)
Shepherd
Adobe D, Cherwood Park E Bert
El Camine Real N
Tero Way Alpine Di
Nes?
van
Van Ness Ci
Hyde St
Powell St 101
Hyde's
Fuilton Way Ricco Parkway
009°
-002 329
Powell St 024 002 008 008
001 011 015
W Rossi St 009 022 022 007 101
007 020 1012 023 006 022
011 001 008 NDO 013
13 017 006 020 010
Monterey County 009 027 009 014
Food Bank 004 008 051
019 025 001
038 002 050
025 033 010
020 010 Huron
029 007 012 023 022 004
002 004 Hopi St
018 036 048 012 014 012
006 005 046 013 012
017 004 011
014 018 013
NDO 023
014 024 002
001 006
183 016
019 003 013 014
021 019 005a
008 -008 010 rossi St
022
Salinas Station 001 001 016
Southern Pacific 020 019 001
Spoctrum Auto Mood Que
SITE PLAN REVIEW 2025-014
200 CASENTINI STREET
Exhibit "K"
/:ComDev/Planning Share SpacelSite Plan Reviews|2025 SPR'sISPR 2025-014 - 200 Casentini Approval DocumentslExhibit / - AB 2097 Vicinity Map.docx
DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION CONCESSION AND WAIVER REQUEST
CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS
Milestone Housing Group in partnership with the Monterey County Housing Authority proposes to develop a currently vacant parcel along Casentini Street as an affordable large family apartment community on a 4.9-acre site comprised of one parcel (APN: 003-161-030) with an address of 200 Casentini Street, Salinas, CA. The Monterey County Housing Authority is the current owner of the project property.
The project sponsor proposes to regrade the vacant property and construct a new 100% affordable multi-family residential apartment community and a new day care center. The residential community portion of the project will consist of five (5) new, 3-story apartment buildings and will include eighty-eight (88) apartment units with a mix of 1-bedroom, 2- bedroom, and 3-bedroom apartments. The residential community will also include a leasing/amenity building, a tot lot, and sport court, a dog park area, walking paths, and a mix of covered and surface parking spaces totaling 152 parking spaces.
There is a total of eighty-eight (88) residential apartment units, which includes 87 low income or subsidized housing units and one (1) Manager's Unit. The unit mix is broken down in the Table below and reflects twenty-four (24) one-bedroom units (27.3%), twenty-four (24) two-bedroom units (27.3%), and forty (40) three-bedroom units (45.4%). This unit mix allows for this project to be considered as a large family project. The project also includes a leasing/amenity building with indoor fitness, business/computer room, and a community room. Exterior amenities include a sport court with a basketball hoop for all residents of the project and a tot lot for children up to nine (9) years of age.
The Day Care Center, measuring roughly 4,335 square feet, will provide services to children from newborn age up to 5 years of age. The building will be divided into two classrooms with one room for children 0-24 months and the second classroom for children 24 months to 60 months. Each classroom will have their own secure outdoor play area. The building will include bathrooms, offices for staff, a breakroom, and a kitchen for meal preparation. The Daycare Center will have their own access into the property off Casentini Street and will include 16 parking spaces.
The project will be 100% affordable for households with income at or below 60% of Area Median Income (AMI). The Average AMI level for the project is roughly 49%. The breakdown of AMI levels, unit mix, and number of subsidized units are found in the Table below:
Exhibit C
CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS
UNIT MIX AMI BREAK DOWN
BEDROOM TYPE AMI LEVEL NUMBER OF UNITS
1-BEDROOM 30.00% 3
1-BEDROOM 40.00% 4
1-BEDROOM 50.00% 12
1-BEDROOM 60.00% 7
2-BEDROOM 30.00% 3
2-BEDROOM 40.00% 4
2-BEDROOM 50.00% 12
2-BEDROOM 60.00% 8
3-BEDROOM 30.00% 4
3-BEDROOM 40.00% 6
3-BEDROOM 50.00% 15
3-BEDROOM 60.00% 9
TOTAL UNIT COUNT (SUBSIDIZED) 87
TOTAL UNIT COUNT AT 30% AMI 10
TOTAL UNIT COUNT AT 40% AMI 14
TOTAL UNIT COUNT AT 50% AMI 39
TOTAL UNIT COUNT AT 60% AMI 24
AVERAGE AMI LEVEL 49%
The project seeks on-going rental subsidies in the form of Project-Based Section 8 Vouchers from the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey in addition to tax exempt bond financing and low-income housing tax credits.
To develop the Casentini Street Family Apartments and provide necessary affordable housing to the community, the project requires incentives/concessions and/or waivers as allowed through the State Density Bonus Law. Currently, per our analysis of the City of Salinas Zoning Code, waivers required to allow for the development of the project include removing the restriction on tandem parking spaces, a waiver for not providing 4-bedroom units in our project design, and a waiver requesting a reduction in required open space. Below is a written explanation of the why this 100% affordable large family apartment community could not be developed without these requested waivers.
Waiver Request #1: Article V. Division 2. Parking, Loading, and Outdoor Lighting; Section 37-50.360. Off Street Parking and Loading Spaces Regulations Table 37-50.100:
The project applicant is requesting a waiver of Article V; Division 2; Section 37-50.360; Table 37-50.100 regarding required number of parking spaces per unit type. The project proposes a total of 88 units with 26 One-Bedroom Units, 28 Two-Bedroom Units, and 34 Three Bedroom Units. Per Table 37-50.100 of the City of Salinas Zoning Code Section 37-50.360, based on our unit mix, our required number of parking spaces is 163 spaces. Per the table below, also found in our Project Matrix on Sheet A1.0 of our Site Plan Review Application plan set, we are providing a total of 152 parking spaces. This reflects an eleven (11) stall deficit in the total required number of parking spaces.
Per the State Government Code under Title 7; Division 1; Chapter 4.3 Density Bonus and Other Incentives under Section 65915(p)(1) Law, we are allowed to use a parking ratio of 1 parking stall per every 1-Bedroom Unit, and 1.5 parking stalls per every 2 and 3-Bedroom unit without a requirement to apply for an additional waiver. As reflected in the table below, using the State Density Bonus Law related to parking ratios per bedroom type, our required parking would total 120 stalls. We are providing 152 parking spaces, which exceeds the parking requirements using State Density Bonus Law.
In the light of the above, we respectfully request that the State Density Bonus Law parking ratios be applied as part of our application. In addition, as part of our Waiver Request, if we are required to add eleven (11) parking stalls to meet the City parking requirements, we would be required to remove an entire building section, which would equate to losing four (4) stacks of units or a total of twelve (12) much-needed affordable housing units.
Parking Required
Parking Required Parking Required Total Parking Parking Provided Total Parking Bedroom Type Number of Units Per State Density Per Unit Type per Unit Type Total Provided Provided
Bonus Law
1-BEDROOM 1.5 4.5
1-BEDROOM 1.5 6
1-BEDROOM 12 1.5
1-BEDROOM 1.5
2-BEDROOM 2
2-BEDROOM 4 2
2-BEDROOM 12 2
2-BEDROOM 2
3-BEDROOM 4 2 1.5
3-BEDROOM 6
NNN N NNN
3-BEDROOM 15
3-BEDROOM 9
MANAGER UNIT -2-
2 BEDROOM
TOTAL 88 1.85 163 1.36 120 1.73
Waiver Request #2: Section 20-18.020 - Prohibition of Oversized Vehicle Parking (Tandem Parking Stalls):
The Project Applicant is requesting a waiver of Article XVIII - Regulating the Parking of Over- Size Vehicles under Section 20-18.020 prohibiting the ability to park vehicles exceeding 20 feet in length. Per Sheet A1.0: Site Plan, of our Site Plan Review Application plan set, our project data section reflects a total of 152 proposed parking stalls for our residential community. The table below reflects the total number of parking stalls, the breakdown of parking stalls provided per unit type, and the breakdown of tandem parking stalls as part of the 152 total parking spaces provided. As such, of the 152 total parking spaces provided, there is a total of sixty-four (64) tandem parking spaces. This is separated as 40 tandem stalls in our parking garages within the residential buildings and another 24 tandem stalls in our surface parking areas.
In review of our project plan and building layout, losing 64 parking spaces would have a significant impact on the number of affordable units provided in the project. Based on calculating the current number of parking spaces provided and removing the 64 tandem spaces, it leaves the project with a total of 91 parking spaces. Based on the parking ratio of what is provided at 1.73 stalls per unit, we would lose roughly 35 much-needed affordable residential units.
CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS
PARKING BREAKDOWN
PARKING TYPE I TANDEM SPACES TOTAL SPACES
TANDEM GARAGE
TANDEM OPEN STALL
SINGLE GARAGE
OPEN SPACE - SINGLE
TOTAL UNIT COUNT (SUBSIDIZED) 64 152
Parking Required Parking Required Parking Provided
Parking Required Per State Density Total Parking Total Parking Bedroom Type Number of Units Provided Provided
per Unit Type Total Por Unit Type
Bonus Law
1-BEDROOM 3 1.5
1-BEDROOM 4 1.5 ----
1-BEDROOM 12 1.5
L-BEDROOM 1.5
- BEDROOI 3 2
2-BEDROOM 4 2
2-BEDROOM
2-BEDROOM
3-BEDROOM 2
3-BEDROOM 2 12 NNNN
3-BEDROOM 15 2 30
3 BEDROOM 9 2 18
MANAGER UNIT - 2- 1 2 2 2 2
BEDROOM
TOTAL BB 1.85 163 1.36 120 1.73 152
Waiver Request #3: Section 37-30.170; Table 37-30.80 - Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit (Percent of total dwelling units):
Our proposed large family project at 200 Casentini Street is zoned for Residential High Density.
Section 37-30.170 of the Zoning code under Table 37-30.80 requires that 10% of all dwelling units in our project include 4 or more bedrooms. As reflected above in our unit and AMI breakdown, our project includes a total of 87 apartment units. With the manager unit, we have a total of 88 units. This would require that we would include nine (9) 4-bedroom units. This requirement would require an adjustment to the building and unit design to reduce the number of 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, and 3-bedroom units to incorporate the 4-bedroom units. This adjustment to include 10% of the total unit count would result in a loss of 15 units (including the manager's unit) of much-needed affordable residential units
Waiver Request #4: Section 37-30.170; Table 37-30.80 - Usable Open Space Area per Dwelling Unit - Minimum:
Our proposed large family project at 200 Casentini Street is zoned for Residential High Density.
Section 37-30.170 under Table 37-30.80 of the Zoning code Development Regulations requires that we provide a minimum of 500 square feet of usable open space per dwelling unit. Our project proposes 88 residential units which equate to a minimum of 44,000 Square Feet of required usable open space. Per Sheet A1.2 Common Open Space of our Site Plan Review Application Plan Set, our project is currently providing 27,305.93 square feet of usable open space.
Our Open Space exhibit reflects six (6) Open Space areas where our calculation derives from.
Although there is a substantial amount of excess land on our 4.9-acre parcel, a large area of the site has slopes greater than a 10% slope and cannot be considered for usable open space. The Usable Open Space being provided, 27,306, equates to roughly 310 square feet per unit or a deficiency of roughly 190 square feet per unit. In order for our project to increase our usable open space, we need to reduce our residential building area by 16,694 square feet. Our current residential building area is roughly 121,240 square feet or roughly 1,378 square feet per unit (gross). Reducing the building area by roughly 17,000 square feet, our unit count would reduce from 88 units down to 75 units. Without our requested waiver for this development regulation, the project would lose roughly 13 much-need affordable residential units.
If City Staff would like additional information related to this Waiver Request and analysis stated above, please contact Aaron Barger at [email protected] or at 408-640-1100 to discuss further.
CASENTINI STREET FAMILY APARTMENTS PUD2025-003; SPR 2025-014; CUP 2025-025 DAY CARE CENTER DAILY OPERATIONAL AND SAFETY/SECURITY/EVACUATION PLAN COMMENT REPSONSE 18. DAY CARE CENTER
City of Salinas
Community Development Department
65 West Alisal Street
Salinas, CA 92901
(831) 758-7206
OPERATIONAL / ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT
following blanks accordingly (Attach additional sheets if necessary): It is important that this statement accurately describes the proposed project. Please fill in the
1. Please provide the following:
a.
Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 003-161-030-000
b. Site Address Casentini Street (near Intersection with Rico) - vacant land. c. Parcel size (square feet and/or acres) 4.90 acres
2. Describe the nature of your operation (please be specific) Day Care operation for children 1 month to 5 years. Will have two separate classrooms with one classroom for children 0-24 months and then the second classroom for children from 24 months to 5 years of age. Services will include food provisions
3. What is the existing (or previous) use of the property? Vacant land with no structures on site. for breakfast, lunch, and snacks, outdoor playtime, and classroom functions for learning. Remainder of property used for multifamily housing.
4. What products will be produced by the operation? What materials will be used? Will assembly of the product occur on-site? Will these products be sold on-site? Development of site as stated in Project Description is proposed as a now 100% affordable large family rontal apartment community with approximately 88 apartment homes with associated parking and amenities. A Day Care Center, run by a third party operator, is also included in the proposed development application for children from Newborn to Five (45) years old.
No products will be produced. Construction materials will include wood, stucco, concrete, siding, window glazing, paint, asphalt for driveways, and playground equipment.
5. What are the proposed hours of operation? Months (if seasonal)? Days per week? Hours (from 530AM tO 5:00PM )? Total hours per day? Only closed on national holidays (10 days). Hours of operation - Ag Famililes - 5:30am - 5pm rest of year is 7am to 5pm
6. Describe any special activities or events. Frequency? Fall/Harvest Festival; 1 x a month there is a parent meeting; Seasonal festivities (Winter Festival Promotional events for graduation
7. How many customers/visitors are expected per day on average? kid drop off and pick up (7am-8am) pick up 3:30-5pm
8. How many employees will there be? Are additional employees anticipated? What hours do they work? Do any live on-site (as a caretaker)? Approximately six (6) full time Employees that will work from 5:30AM through 5:00PM. There are no employees that will live on site.
9. What equipment, materials, or supplies will be used, and how will they be stored? Playground on it; Propare some food on site; Stored in cabinerts Janitorial items are stored in a shed or a dedicated closet not accessible to students; school sure!
10. Will there be any service or delivery vehicles? Number? Frequency? Food is weekly delivered; Janirotial and office supplies 1 x per moth
11. What are the total number of parking spaces on-site? Residential Parking spaces provide in the open air parking lots total 64 spaces.
Parking for the Day Care is provide in an open parking lot and includes 16 parking stalls. The re
12. How will access be provided to the site (street name(s))? Driveway at project frontage along Casentini Street provides access to the residential buildings. There is a second driveway that provides separate access to the day f ExhibitI