San Anselmo City Council
August 25, 2026

Tuesday, August 25, 2026 7:00 PM
In the Council Chambers and via Zoom at 525 San Anselmo Avenue, San Anselmo, CA 94960 Town Council
Agenda
Meeting held In-Person and via Zoom:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87104165964
Or Telephone: +1 669 900 6833 | Webinar ID: 871 0416 5964 How to Submit Comments Before the Meeting: Members of the public are encouraged to submit email correspondence to [email protected] or eComments on the Agendas and Meeting webpage before the meeting begins.

How to Participate During the Meeting: Members of the public will have the option to speak during the meeting through the Zoom application by using their phone or an electronic device.

For PC, Mac, or smart phone, use the Raise Hand function when public comment for an item is requested. It is a button that is located at the top or bottom of your screen, based on your electronic device.

For landline phones, Raise Hand to be recognized with *9 Please be advised that those participating in the meeting remotely via Zoom do so at their own risk.

The Town Council's regular meeting will not be cancelled if any technical problems occur during the meeting.

Call to Order. Optional Pledge of Allegiance: The Mayor or a designated Council member will recite the Pledge of Allegiance for members of the Council and the public who wish to join in the recitation.

Open time for public expression.

The public is welcome to address the Council at this time on matters not on the agenda that are within the jurisdiction of the Council. Please be advised that pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, Council is not permitted to discuss or take action on any matter not on the agenda unless it determines that an emergency exists, or that there is a need to take immediate action which arose Town Council Agenda August 25, 2026
1 1. Consent Agenda:

1.1 Approve the Draft Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 28, 2026 and the Draft Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 11, 2026

1.2 Community Development Department FY 2025–26 Fourth Quarter Report (April-June).

Receiving this report is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act, because it does not involve an activity which has the potential to cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §21065)

1.3 Consideration and Adoption of Amendments to the Robson-Harrington Community Garden Rules and Bylaws

1.4 Receive and File Report of Checks Issued, July 2026

1.5 Receive and File Revenue and Expenditure Reports, July 2026 following posting of the agenda. Comments may be no longer than three minutes and should be respectful to the community.

Council requests for future agenda items.

Council committee liaison reports, questions and comments to staff; staff miscellaneous items.

Staff Miscelaneous Items
Town Manager Miscellaneous Items PPT Presentation (PPT) Special Presentation. There are No special Presentations.

The opportunity for public comment on consent agenda items will occur prior to Council discussion of the consent agenda. The Council may approve the entire consent agenda with one action. In the alternative, items on the consent agenda may be removed by any Council or staff member, for separate discussion and vote.

Staff Report (DOC)
Attachment 1- Draft Minutes of the July 28, 2026 Regular Town Council Meeting (DOC) Attachment 2- Draft Minutes of the August 11, 2026 Special Town Council Meeting (DOC) Staff Report (DOC)
Staff Report (PDF)
Attachment 1: Community Gardens Redlined Rules (PDF)
Attachment 2: Parks and Recreation Commission Redlined Rules (PDF) Attachment 3: Final Rules (PDF)
Attachment 4: Community Gardens Redlined Bylaws (PDF)
Attachment 5: Parks and Recreation Commission Redlined Bylaws (PDF) Attachment 6: Final Bylaws (PDF)
Staff Report (DOCX)
Attachment 1 Check Report July 2026 (PDF)
Staff Report (DOCX)
Attachment 1 Budget Comparison Report by Subcategory, July 2026 (PDF) Attachment 2 Budget Comparison Report by Department, July 2026 (PDF) Town Council Agenda August 25, 2026
2 1.6 Receive and File the Financial Report on Recreation Fund ending July 31, 2026

1.7 Adopt an Ordinance Amendment Repealing and Replacing Title 10 “Planning and Zoning”, Chapter 11 “Density Bonus” Consistent with State Law. The Ordinance Amendment is not a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378 because it consists of organizational and administrative actions implementing mandatory provisions of state law and does not commit the Town to any specific development project.

1.8 Authorize the Mayor to Sign a Position Letter for Central Marin Sanitation Agency

1.9 Accept the Fire Station 20 Renovation Project and Authorize Staff to File a Notice of Completion

2. Council Business Items:

2.1 Receive and File Report on the Town's Cybersecurity and IT Resilience: Overview of Town Systems, Incident Response, and Cyber Insurance Coverage. Receipt of an informational report is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act, because it does not involve an activity which has the potential to cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21065).

2.2 Receive and File Presentation by the Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority. Receipt of a presentation by Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act, because it does not involve an activity which has the potential to cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Cal.

Pub. Res. Code § 21065).

Attachment 3 Budget Comparison Report by Subcategory Measure J, July 2026 (PDF) Attachment 4 Budget Comparison Report by Department Measure J, July 2026 (PDF) Staff Report (PDF)
Attachment 1 - July 2026 Budget Report (PDF)
Attachment 2 - July 2026 Recreation Capital Outlay, Special Event Expense, and Older Adult Programming (PDF)
Staff Report (DOC)
Attachment 1- Ordinance (DOC)
Staff Report (DOC)
Attachment 1- Draft Position Letter (DOC)
Staff Report (PDF)
In general, the following procedural order applies to items of business:
•Presentation
•Town Council questions
•PUBLIC COMMENT – limited to 3 minutes/person
•Town Council discussion/action
Staff Report (DOCX)
PowerPoint Presentation (PPT)
Staff Report (DOCX)
Attachment 1- Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority 101 Presentation (PDF) Town Council Agenda August 25, 2026
3 2.3 Authorize the Mayor to Sign the Attached Letter Responding to Marin County Civil Grand Jury Report: MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes. Receiving this report is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act, because it does not involve an activity which has the potential to cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §21065)

2.4 Receive Presentation of Memorial Park Athletic Courts Improvement Project & 60% Design Review and Provide Direction to Staff. The Town finds this Project to be categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare environmental documents under the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1, as it involves the maintenance and minor alteration of an existing facility with negligible or no expansion of use.

Staff Report (DOC)
Attachment 1- MCE, Marin Clean Energy A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes (PDF)
Attachment 2 - Response to Grand Jury Report.docx
Staff Report (PDF)
Attachment 1 - Conceptual Design (PDF)
Attachment 2 - Presentation (PDF)
Attachment 3 - Public Comments from Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting 8.18.26 (PDF)
Public Comment- Farley (PDF)
Public Comment- Gamucio (PDF)
Public Comment- Kasin (PDF)
Public Comment- Miller (PDF)
Public Comment- Wood (PDF)
Public Comment- Wu (PDF)
Adjourn
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Town Staff at email [email protected]. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make reasonable accommodations to help ensure accessibility to this meeting.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Town Council regarding any item on this agenda after the distribution of the original packet will be made available for public inspection at the public counter at Town Hall located at 525 San Anselmo Avenue.

Notice is hereby given that Council may discuss and/or take action on any or all of the items listed on this agenda.

If any of these matters above are challenged in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at any public hearing described on this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered at, or prior to, this Council meeting. Judicial review of an administrative decision of the Town Council must be filed with the Court not later than the 90th day following the date of the Council’s decision (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6) Any item not under discussion before 10:00 p.m. may be continued to the next regular meeting. Next regular meeting is September 8, 2026.

Administration Department
Town Hall
525 San Anselmo Avenue
San Anselmo, CA 94960
Town Council Agenda August 25, 2026
4 (415) 258-4691
Town Council
Steve Burdo, Mayor
Chantel Walker, Vice Mayor
Yoav Schlesinger, Councilmember
Eileen Burke, Councilmember
Tarrell Kullaway, Councilmember
Staff
David Donery, Town Manager
Linda Kenton, Assistant Town Manager / Town Librarian
Jeff Zuba, Finance and Admin Services Director
Megan Holt Acevedo, Town Attorney
Serge Avila, Town Clerk
Heidi Scoble, Community Development Director
Scott Schneider, Public Works Director
Mattie O'Grady, Community Services Director
Mike Norton, Chief of Police
Dan Mahoney, Fire Chief

DECLARATION OF POSTING
This Notice is posted in accordance with Government Code §54954.2(a) or §54956. Members of the public can view electronic agendas and staff reports by accessing the Town of San Anselmo website. Under penalty of perjury, this Agenda was posted to the public at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

Town Council Agenda August 25, 2026
5 1
BEFORE…
6 2
7 3
HILLDALE “POCKET” PARK

RIBBON CUTTING CEREMONY
Saturday, September 19, 2026
10:30am
Mayor Steve Burdo • Town Manager Dave
Donery • Public Works Director Scott
Schneider
Light refreshments served
Kids craft activity provided
8 4
9 Item #: 1.1

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item #: 1.1
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Approval of the Draft Minutes of the Regular Town Council Meeting of July 28, 2026 and Draft Minutes of
the Special Town Council Meeting of August 11, 2026
FROM: Serge Avila, Town Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: For Council to consider the approval of the Regular Town Council meeting Draft Minutes of July 28, 2026 and Special Town Council meeting Draft Minutes of August 11, 2026.

ATTACHMENT:

Attachment 1- July 28, 2026 Draft Minutes
Attachment 2- August 11, 2026 Draft Minutes
10 1
San Anselmo Draft Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
Town Council Chambers and via Zoom
Tuesday, July 28, 2026
Interviews for Infrastructure and Fiscal Monitoring Committee- 6:40 p.m.

The Council interviewed Ross Asselstine, Erik Selvig.

Call to Order: Optional Pledge of Allegiance
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Burdo (Mayor)
Chantel Walker (Vice Mayor)
Eileen Burke
Tarrell Kullaway
Yoav Schlesinger

STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Dave Donery, Town Manager
Emily Longfellow, Town Attorney
Serge Avila, Town Clerk
Heidi Scoble, Community Development Director
Scott Schneider, Interim Public Works Director
Will Messinger, Assistant Civil Engineer
Linda Kenton, Town Librarian

Open Time for Public Expression
There were no public comments.

Council requests for future agenda items; Committee liaison reports; questions and comments to staff; miscellaneous items
Vice Mayor Walker reported she attended the Ross Valley Fire Authority Board meeting; “San Anselmo Night” at the Pacific’s game; several MCE meetings; would like the Council to discuss the Town’s Findings to the recent Grand Jury report regarding MCE. The Council agreed to this request.

Councilmember Burke reported she attended the Memorial Park Advisory Committee meeting; the retirement party for the Town of Ross Department of Public Works Director; coordinated with some Elder Gardens volunteers and the Department of Public Works about a project; attended the Ross Valley Fire Authority Board meeting; several Live on the Avenue events which were spectacular!
Councilmember Kullaway reported she attended the opening of Two Tap; the opening of the Resiliency Hub; the Fairfax/San Anselmo Children’s Center Gala and Fundraiser; the party for the opening of the Sorich Park Bike Connector; has been working with the Climate Action Committee.

Councilmember Schlesinger reported he attended the friends and family preview for Two Tap; the Marin Wildfire Prevention Authority (MWPA) meeting; the Transportation Authority of Marin 11 2
(TAM) meeting; discussed the recent PG&E Public Safety Power Shut-off (PSPS); two Town Council seats will be on the November ballot; today is National Milk Chocolate Day.

Mayor Burdo reported he attended the Memorial Park Advisory Committee meeting; cut the ribbon at the opening of the Solar Resiliency Hub; threw out the First Pitch at the Pacific’s Game (low and inside); attended Beatle’s Night at the Park and several Live on the Avenues.

Town Manager Donery reported on the article in the recent Newsletter thanking retired Public Works Director Sean Condry. Assistant Director Schneider has been appointed as the Interim Director. Staff will be receiving three design options for Creek Park on Friday which will be included in the next newsletter. A series of public meetings will begin on Tuesday with a presentation coming to the Council on August 11th.

Special Presentations - There was no Special Presentations

1. Consent Agenda

1.1 Approved the Draft Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 23, 2026

1.2 Received and Filed Report of Checks Issued, June 2026

1.3 Received and Filed Revenue and Expenditure Reports, June 2026

1.4 Received and Filed the Financial Report on Recreation Fund ending June 30, 2020

1.5 Approved Special Event Application- Goblins’ BOOtacular 2026

1.6 Adopt a Resolution to Repeal Pavement and Drainage Assistance Program

1.7 Adopted Ordinance No. 2026-1201 of the Town of San Anselmo Amending Title 10 “Planning and Zoning”, Chapter 3 “Zoning”, Article 13 “Conditional Use Permit”; Removing Title 10, Chapter 3, Article 6, Section 10-3.607 “Nonconforming Uses and Improvements” and Replacing with New Article 29 “Nonconforming Uses, Structure, and Lots”; and Associated CEQA Findings.

Mayor Burdo opened the meeting to public comments.

There were no comments.

Mayor Burdo closed the meeting to public comments.

Vice Mayor Walker stated he would like to pull item #1.6 for discussion.

M/s, Schlesinger/Kullaway, Motion to approve Consent Calendar items #1.1 through #1.5 and #1.7
AYES: Burke, Kullaway, Schlesinger, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo

1.6 Adopt a Resolution to Repeal Pavement and Drainage Assistance Program Vice Mayor Walker stated which streets are owned and not owned in San Anselmo has been a topic of discussion and she wondered if they should proceed with the resolution. Staff answered questions regarding the details about whether a road is maintained; how residents can obtain assistance.
12 3
M/S, Schlesinger/Kullaway, Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2026-4639 to Repeal Pavement and Drainage Assistance Program Consent Calendar items #1.6.

AYES: Burke, Kullaway, Schlesinger, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo Council Business Items

2.1 Authorize the Town Manager to Negotiate and Execute an Agreement with the Property Owners of 305 San Anselmo Avenue (APN 007-282-20) for Public Parking in the Private Lot and Find the Project Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (14 Cal.

Code Regs. Section 15301)
Interim Public Works Director Schneider presented a report and a PowerPoint presentation.

Staff answered questions from the Council regarding the term being considered; if the property owners would be responsible for setting the policies and pricing for the lot; the contemplated revenue sharing; fiscal impacts; if this would be cost-neutral for the Town; if the machines would be leased/rented; if it could be made clear that these are not Town machines; if the CMPA would be used for enforcement; if enforcement would be carved out of the Town’s time and thus reduce enforcement along the avenue; what is the benefit to the Town; what problem is being solved; if there is anything that would prohibit the owner from running this business as a private parking lot; could this be a Pilot Program; how CMPA would enforce parking and issue citations in this private lot.

Mayor Burdo opened the meeting to public comments.

Mr. Amir Kia, part of the property ownership, discussed how this conversation came about.

They currently have a monitoring system through an app. There are waves of cars coming in to park and it is difficult to control. They want to work with the Town to make the lot a resource.

Mayor Burdo closed the meeting to public comments.

Mayor Burdo worried about perception and thought it would be seen as a Town program. He has no problem leasing the machines to someone who wants to operate a private lot. He needs more information.

Councilmember Schlesinger was not there yet and did not see the benefit to the Town. It comes down to the question of enforcement.

Councilmember Burke stated the property owner could run this business as a private parking lot. This seemed to be the better path.

Vice Mayor Walker liked the idea of more parking downtown. They need to understand the impact of CMPA enforcement. It needs to be cost-neutral.

Councilmember Kullaway would like to use this as an opportunity to leverage more safety projects.

Staff thanked the Council for the input and stated they will provide more information and try to address the issues.

Public Hearing Items

2.2 Consideration of an Urgency Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of San Anselmo Adopting a Temporary Moratorium on New Tobacco Retailer Licenses Pending Study and Possible Adoption of Permanent Regulations
13 4
Librarian Kenton presented the staff report. Staff answered questions from the Council regarding what happens after the 45 day time period that the Urgency Ordinance is in effect; what information is staff waiting on from the Town of Corte Madera and the City of Mill Valley; what is the urgency; are there pending applications for new tobacco retailers; what happens if they do nothing; if there is a review of tobacco sales at the Town level; how long does it take from the submittal of an application to issuance of a retail tobacco license.

Mayor Burdo opened the meeting to public comments.

There were no comments.

Mayor Burdo closed the meeting to public comments.

Vice Mayor Walker supported adoption of the ordinance.

Councilmember Burke did not see the urgency and stated this would not impact anyone negatively. She is not in favor of the ordinance.

Councilmember Kullaway stated she would like to see this happen.

Councilmember Schlesinger stated he is not opposed to this but agreed with Councilmember Burke that it is not necessary.

Mayor Burdo could see an argument for urgency and he is supportive.

M/s, Walker/Kullaway, Motion to Adopt an Urgency Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of San Anselmo Adopting a Temporary Moratorium on New Tobacco Retailer Licenses Pending Study and Possible Adoption of Permanent Regulations.

AYES: Kullaway, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo
NOES: Burke
ABSTAIN: Schlesinger
Town Attorney Longfellow stated the motion did not pass since it needed a 4/5th vote.

2.3 Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance Amendment Repealing and Replacing Title 10 “Planning and Zoning”, Chapter 11 “Density Bonus” Consistent with State Law Town Attorney Longfellow presented the staff report. Staff answered questions from the Council regarding whether there are properties within a half mile of a major transit stop; if a developer could build a six-story building in Town given the density bonus; if the Town would have any recourse to a six-story development; what would happen if a transit stop moved out of Town; the role of a “high quality transit center” and parking provisions; the correlation between the degree of affordability and the number of concessions received.

Mayor Burdo opened the meeting to public comments.

There were no comments
Mayor Burdo closed the meeting to public comments.
14 5
M/s, Burke/Walker, Motion to Read by Title only an Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of San Anselmo Repealing and Replacing Title 10 “Planning and Zoning”, Chapter 11 “Density Bonus” and Making Associated CEQA Exemption Findings.

AYES: Burke, Kullaway, Schlesinger, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo M/s, Burke/Schlesinger, Motion to Introduce the Ordinance Amendment, approve its first reading and waive the second reading.

AYES: Burke, Kullaway, Schlesinger, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo Council Business Items

2.4 Adopt a Resolution of Intent to Abandon a Portion of a Public Easement Adjacent to 250 Redwood Road in San Anselmo
Assistant Civil Engineer Messinger presented the staff report. Staff answered a question from the Council regarding the sequence of events in terms of Planning Commission and Town Council review.

Mayor Burdo opened the meeting to public comments.

There were no comments.

Mayor Burdo closed the meeting to public comments.

M/s, Schlesinger/Burke, Motion to Adopt a Resolution of Intent to Abandon a Portion of a Public Easement Adjacent to 250 Redwood Road in San Anselmo.

AYES: Burke, Kullaway, Schlesinger, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo

2.5 Appoint (3) members to the Infrastructure and Fiscal Monitoring Committee (IFMC) Town Clerk Avila presented the staff report and a PowerPoint presentation. Staff answered a question from the Council regarding when the terms would end.

Mayor Burdo asked the Council to select their top three candidates.

Councilmember Burke selected Marie Henrio, Erik Selvig, and Ross Asselstine.

Vice Mayor Walker selected Marie Henrio, Stan Radtke, and Erik Selvig.

Councilmember Kullaway selected Marie Henrio, Stan Radtke, and Erik Selvig.

Councilmember Schlesinger selected Erik Selvig, Marie Henrio, and Stan Radtke Mayor Burdo selected Marie Henrio, Stan Radtke, and Erik Selvig.

Mayor Burdo opened the meeting to public comments.

There were no comments.

Mayor Burdo closed the meeting to public comments.

M/s, Walker/Kullaway, Motion to appoint Marie Henrio, Stan Radtke, and Erik Selvig to the Infrastructure and Fiscal Monitoring Committee (IFMC).

AYES: Burke, Kullaway, Schlesinger, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo 15 6
M/s, Burke/Kullaway, Motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:33 p.m. in memory of Brookside student Lincoln Kramer who tragically died while on vacation.

AYES: Burke, Kullaway Schlesinger, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo Respectfully submitted,
Toni DeFrancis,
Recording Secretary
16 1
San Anselmo Draft Council Minutes
Special Meeting
Town Council Chambers and via Zoom
Tuesday, August 11, 2026
Call to Order: Optional Pledge of Allegiance
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Burdo (Mayor)
Chantel Walker (Vice Mayor)
Eileen Burke
Tarrell Kullaway
Yoav Schlesinger

STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Dave Donery, Town Manager
Megan Acevedo, Town Attorney (via Zoom)
Serge Avila, Town Clerk
Linda Kenton, Town Librarian
Scott Schneider, Interim Public Works Director
Kelley Werner, Engagement Coordinator
Jeff Zuba, Finance & Admin Srvs. Director (via Zoom)

Open Time for Public Expression
Mr. Ross Asselstine, San Anselmo Avenue, stated he looked forward to not being in the press or on TV.

Council requests for future agenda items; Committee liaison reports; questions and comments to staff; miscellaneous items
Mayor Burdo reported he attended the Reimagine Creek Park meeting; he talked about the cost allocation change at the Central Marin Sanitation Agency (CMSA) and requested that the Council discuss sending a letter in protest of the change.

Councilmember Burke gave a “Shout-Out” for the August 29th “Baldy Dash” fundraiser for Live on the Avenue.

Special Presentation
There were no Special Presentations.

1. Consent Agenda

1.1 Receive and Approve the Quarterly Treasurer’s Investment Report, June 2026 Mayor Burdo opened the meeting to public comments.

There were no comments.

Mayor Burdo closed the meeting to public comments.
17 2
M/s, Schlesinger/Kullaway, Motion to approve the Consent Calendar.

AYES: Burke, Kullaway, Schlesinger, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo Council Business Items

2.1 Presentation of Creek Park Plaza Design Options
Town Manager Donery presented the staff report and gave a PowerPoint presentation that included: 1) Creek Park Design Options; 2) Agenda; 3) Staff Introduction; 4) Process to Date; 5) 2023 Creek Park Design; 6) Public Input to Date; 7) Community Voting Results; 8) Comments Summarized; 9) Merchant Parking Map; 10) Addressing Concerns; 11) Potential Project Timeline; 12) RHAA Presentation; 13) Design Considerations; 14) Plaza Design Options; 15) Council Questions; 16) Public Comment; 17) Council Discussion- Preferred Design Option.

Manuela, representing RHAA Landscape Architecture and Planning, gave a PowerPoint presentation that included: 1) Design Considerations/Challenges; 2) Area in Question; 3) Option A- Curvilinear Terrace; 4) Option B- Garden Path; 5) Option C- Town Green.

Staff and the consultant answered questions from the Council regarding whether residents or staff would be moving tables; the amount of seating during COVID; if Option A offers more ADA access; how raising the deck surface will impact the trees and eliminate walking on tree roots; if there have been conversations with the Arts Commission about the wall; if there is an option for shade in Option A; how umbrellas would impact sight lines; rodents and decking; if staff would need to be hired to maintain this new park; if maintenance would be part of the fundraising campaign; if on-going maintenance would be the responsibility of the Town; estimate of maintenance costs; if two restrooms would be enough; if the storage area would need to be increased; the dimensions of the decks; start and end date of the survey; if the plan includes installing textured crossing in that area.

Mayor Burdo opened the meeting to public comments.

Mr. Philip Chigos read a statement about the process for this project.

Mr. Paul Corning supported the comments made by Mr. Chigos. He was concerned about rushed decisions and not enough time for public input.

Pat encouraged the Council to make a unanimous vote to proceed. He noted this is not an “overnight decision” and there have been years of planning.

Mr. Guy Meyer, Tamalpais Avenue, stated the plan began in 2019 to review designs to create a stunning remake. He discussed the history and beauty of the existing park. He was in favor of a creative, low-impact plan.

Mr. Jeff Kroot, talked about the process from an architect’s perspective. Preliminary designs are targets and he asked the Council to get a group of people together with the landscape architects.

Richard agreed with Pat’s comments. He would like to see the Town move forward with this well thought-out plan. He supported Option A with more common area. He suggested a few “tweaks”.

Mr. Ross Asselstine stated the bathrooms take up two parking spaces and they should be moved to another location. The design has to be hydrologically neutral to what was there before. They do not know where they are structurally.
18 3
Ms. Roseanne dalBello stated she is a proponent of the Redwoods and was concerned about trying to work around the roots. She would like to see a lot more open space and more of a “Town Square” design.

Mr. Glen Sherman stated he funded the development of this and has worked with the design professionals since 2019. A lot of work went into this.

Ms. Fran Farmer stated the new design options are more compatible with the character of the Town. She likes Option B with a few modifications.

Mr. Eric Warner, Crescent Avenue, stated the process started in 2019 and there has been a lot of input. He supported Option A.

Ms. Ann Politzer thanked everyone who contributed to the process and staff for being so responsive to comments. The design started out being very grand and she felt it is still not quite there. Structural designs need to be made with respect to the plaza.

Bridgett supported Option A. She has concerns about the parking and would like to see a raised crosswalk to slow down the cars and more trees.

Mayor Burdo closed the meeting to public comments.

Councilmember Burke stated the original vision and plans did not include the plaza area that included buildings. The Town getting the plaza is relatively new. She is in favor of pushing the wall back. She does not want to lose parking spaces and thinks the hydrologic and engineering load concerns are valid. She likes Option A- it provides a lot of flexibility. She wants to move forward.

Councilmember Schlesinger stated the Council’s job is to establish goals and values for the project not to “move things around” on the plans. They have received input from the residents and held numerous meetings. The specifics of the design will come together. He wants to move forward.

Councilmember Kullaway stated she loves Option A. It is elegant, durable, and fits the Town’s character.

Vice Mayor Walker really likes Option A. It supports ADA access in an aging Town. It is important to keep talking about the tree roots.

Mayor Burdo stated he likes Option A and Option B but is leaning towards Option A. He is worried about the wall and the sight lines. The design can be tweaked as they move forward.

Mayor Burdo closed the meeting to public comments.

Councilmember Burke asked RHAA to come up with options for the wall.

2.2 Authorize the Town Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Donation Agreement with a Potential Donor for the Completion of Construction Drawings for the Creek Park Project Town Manager Donery presented the staff report. There were no questions from the Council.

Mayor Burdo opened the meeting to public comments.
19 4
Mr. Ross Asselstine brought up the subject of hydrology. Authorizing one contract for one part of a design team does not do the team justice. A complete design team is needed to move forward in an accurate way.

Mayor Burdo closed the meeting to public comments.

M/s, Burke/Walker, Motion to Authorize the Town Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Donation Agreement with a Donor for the Completion of Construction Drawings and Specifications for the Creek Park Project.

AYES: Burke, Kullaway, Schlesinger, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo M/s, Burke/Kullaway, Motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:51 p.m.

AYES: Burke, Kullaway Schlesinger, Vice Mayor Walker, Mayor Burdo Respectfully submitted,
Toni DeFrancis,
Recording Secretary
20

Item # 1.2

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item #: 1.2
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Community Development Department FY 2025–26 Fourth Quarter Report (April-June)
FROM: Community Development Department
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council receive and file the FY 2025–26 Fourth Quarter Report.

SUMMARY
The purpose of this staff report is to provide the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025–26 Fourth Quarter (April– June 2026) update on activities, performance metrics, and key initiatives undertaken by the Community Development Department and Department of Public Works. During the Fourth Quarter:
 The Planning Division received seven discretionary permit applications, approved 16 discretionary permits, completed 65 zoning compliance reviews for building permits, approved 25 zoning compliance reviews for new business licenses, collected approximately $17,819 in planning fees, and responded to 352 public inquiries.  The Planning Division provided staff support for 14 Board, Committee, and Commission meetings, and continued to advance its long-range planning initiatives, including the General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan Update, Hillside Development Ordinance, and implementation of Housing Element programs.
 The Town issued building permits for eight new housing units, including three multifamily dwellings, three attached accessory dwelling units (ADU), one detached ADU, and one junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU). Additionally, Five ADUs passed their final building inspection and were deemed ready for occupancy.
 The Building Division received 188 permit applications, completed 113 in-house plan check reviews and 75 third-party plan check reviews, issued 236 permits with a total valuation of approximately $12.290 million, collected approximately $591,267 in permit fees retained by the Town, conducted 1,063 inspections, and responded to 1,443 public inquiries.  44 permits were issued for projects supporting the Town's Climate Action Plan goals, including heat pump installations, solar energy systems, battery storage systems, and electric vehicle charging infrastructure.
 Code Enforcement received 82 new complaints and resolved 122 cases while continuing efforts to reduce the Town's overall caseload.
 The Department of Public Works received 153 permit applications, issued 130 permits, collected approximately $88,296 in permit fees, processed projects with a total valuation of 21

Item # 1.2
approximately $601,465, and continued providing permitting assistance and engineeringrelated customer service to the public.  With the exception of an increase in Encroachment Permit activity, overall permit activity softened during the quarter. Despite the decline in permit volume, permit revenue increased compared to the previous quarter across all divisions except Planning, reflecting the value and complexity of projects under review.

REPORT ORGANIZATION
The FY 2025–26 Fourth Quarter Report includes a detailed overview of the Community Development Department and Department of Public Works responsibilities. This report focuses on Fourth quarter performance metrics, permitting activity, workload indicators, and progress on key initiatives.

PLANNING DIVISION UPDATES AND FOURTH QUARTER RELATED STATISTICS

AND INFORMATION
The Planning Division administers both discretionary and ministerial land use applications, oversees long-range planning initiatives, and supports implementation of the Town’s General Plan and Climate Action Plan. The Division also provides staff support to the Town Council, Planning Commission, General Plan Advisory Committee, Economic Development Committee, Open Space Committee, and Climate Action Commission.

The Planning Division's responsibilities are as follows:
 Current Planning
 Advanced Planning
 Housing Element Implementation
 Climate Action and Sustainability Planning, Implementation, and Compliance  Public Information
Current Planning
The Planning Division reviews and processes development applications, including Design Review, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Sign Permits, and zoning compliance. Staff conduct environmental review, provide guidance to applicants, and support decision-makers to ensure projects comply with the Town’s plans, regulations, and policies. A list of current planning applications can be found at: Pending Projects | San Anselmo, CA - Official Website.

Planning Projects
During the period from April through June 2026 (see Figure 1), the Planning Division received seven discretionary permit applications, including four administrative permits and three Planning Commission permits. During the same period, the Division approved 16 discretionary permits, consisting of nine administrative permits and seven Planning Commission permits.

Additionally, seven ministerial applications were submitted, and six ministerial applications were approved during the same period. These applications include Address Changes, Chicken Coops, Sign Permits, and SB-9 applications.
22

Item # 1.2
Compared to the previous quarter, the Division approved two more discretionary permits but received 10 fewer discretionary applications. Ministerial activity increased, with three more applications and three more approvals, each.

Figure 1
Ministerial Building Permits and Zoning Reviews
During the reporting period, 66 building permit applications were routed to the Planning Division for zoning compliance review, and staff completed review of 65 permits (see Figure 2).

Compared to the previous quarter, the number of permits routed for zoning review decreased by one permit, and the number of completed zoning reviews decreased by 10.

Figure 2
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
April May June Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Q4: Planning Projects
Received Ministerial Received Administrative Received Planning Commission Approved Ministerial Approved Administrative Approved Planning Commission 0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
April May June Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Q4: Zoning Reviews for Ministerial Building Permits)
(Received and Completed)
Reviews Received Reviews Completed
23

Item # 1.2
Planning Fees
Figure 3 shows the total amount of Planning Permit fees collected. During this period, the Planning Division collected $17,819 in fees, which is $17,539 less than the previous quarter.

Figure 3
Business License Zoning Clearance Review
Figure 4 shows the number of business license applications approved by the Planning Division.

During this reporting period, 25 business license applications were received and approved, including 10 Home Occupation Permits and 15 commercial business licenses. Compared to the previous quarter, the Division approved two fewer zoning clearance reviews for business licenses.

Figure 4
$-
$10,000.00
$20,000.00
$30,000.00
$40,000.00
$50,000.00
$60,000.00
April May June Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Q4: Planning Fees Collected
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 April May June Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Q4: New Business Licenses
24

Item # 1.2
Advanced Planning
Advanced planning in San Anselmo involves long-range and policy-focused work to guide the Town’s growth and development. This includes updating the General Plan and specific plans, preparing zoning and ordinance amendments, and developing programs that address sustainability, housing, and community needs. Advanced planning also supports boards, commissions, and committees by providing research, analysis, and recommendations on broader planning and policy issues.

Advanced Planning highlights for this quarter include the following:
 Town Council adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-1200 amending the Zoning Regulations for consistency with the State housing laws.
 Town Council approved a first reading of an Ordinance to update the Town’s Zoning Regulations related to Conditional Use Permits and Non-Conforming Uses.  Continued Planning Commission and Town Council review of the draft General Plan Update.  Continued preparation of a draft Hillside Development Ordinance in coordination with the Hillside Development Ordinance Subcommittee.
 Continued work on the Climate Action Plan Update.

Housing Element Implementation
The Town continues to make significant progress implementing the certified 2023–2031 Housing Element, which was approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development on March 28, 2024. All implementation programs have been initiated or completed, with the exception of Action 8.2c, which calls for consideration of participation in the Firewise USA Community program, which is an initiative dependent on the Ross Valley Fire Department.

Additional information on the Housing Element and implementation status is available on the Town's Housing Element Implementation website.

During this quarter, the Town issued building permits for eight new housing units, including three multifamily dwellings, three attached accessory dwelling units (ADU), one detached ADU, and one junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU). Additionally, five ADUs passed their final building inspection and were deemed ready for occupancy.

Climate Action and Sustainability Planning, Implementation, and Compliance The San Anselmo Climate Action Coordinator, shared half-time with the Town of Fairfax, continues to advance the Town’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) by coordinating with staff, committees, commissions, and the community to implement sustainability initiatives and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Supporting these efforts, the Community Development Department issued 44 building permits this quarter for CAP-related improvements, including heat pumps, solar installations, solar-plus-battery energy storage systems, and EV chargers (Figure 5, on the next page), representing an increase of 19 permits compared to the previous reporting period.
25

Item # 1.2
Figure 5
Planning Division Public Information
The Planning Division provides public information services by responding to inquiries from residents, developers, and businesses, offering guidance on permit requirements, zoning regulations, and development standards, and making plans, ordinances, and project information readily accessible. Staff also facilitate transparency and engagement by providing materials for meetings, hearings, and community outreach efforts.

Public Information Inquiries
Figure 6 shows the types and volume of public inquiries handled by the Planning Division. This data includes only emails sent to the general [email protected] address and does not capture emails sent directly to individual staff members. During the reporting period, the Planning Division responded to a total of 352 public inquiries, consisting of 116 counter inquiries, 160 phone calls, and 76 emails. This represents an increase of 58 inquiries compared to the previous quarter.

Figure 6
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 June May April Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Q4: Permits Supporting the Town's Climate Action Goals
Heatpumps EV Solar Solar with Energy Storage System Energy Storage Only Quarter Total 0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Q4: Public Information Inquiries
Public Counter Phone Calls Emails Quarterly Totals
26

Item # 1.2
Board, Committee, and Commission Support
The Planning Division provides staff support to the Town Council, Planning Commission (PC), the Economic Development Committee (EDC), the Climate Action Commission (CAC), and the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC). During the quarter, the Planning Division provided staff support for 10 Board, Committee, and Commission meetings, including four PC meetings, one GPAC meeting, four CAC meetings, and one EDC meetings were held during the reporting period.

The Department of Public Works supports the Open Space Committee (OSC) and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee (BPC). During this quarter, the Department of Public Works provided staff support for five meetings (four OSC meetings and one BPC meeting).

BUILDING DIVISION UPDATES AND STATISTICS
The Building Division ensures that all private and public construction projects comply with the California Building Codes and the Town’s local amendments. Staff advise the Town Council on periodic updates to these codes, accept building permit applications, provide guidance to the public, and conduct inspections Monday through Thursday.

Key Responsibilities:
 Plan Check: Review construction plans to ensure compliance with California Building Codes and local amendments. Complex projects may involve coordination with the Planning Division, Engineering Division, Ross Valley Fire Department, and third-party plan check consultants.
 Building Permit Issuance: Calculate permit fees, issue permits following plan approval and verify compliance with all requirements before final inspection.  Building Inspection: Conduct inspections to ensure construction meets approved plans and code requirements.
 Public Information: Provide guidance and support to residents, contractors, and developers regarding building regulations and processes.

Permit Plan Check. Figure 7 shows the Building Division's permit activity during the reporting period. A total of 188 building permit applications were received, of which 113 were reviewed in-house and 75 were routed to third-party plan check consultants. During the same period, 236 building permits were issued.

Compared to the previous quarter, permit activity declined, with 20 fewer permit applications received. Despite the decrease in volume, permit revenue increased by $83,683, and total project valuations increased by approximately $3.7 million. In addition, in-house plan reviews decreased by 12, third-party consultant reviews decreased by nine, and 15 fewer building permits were issued than in the previous quarter. 27

Item # 1.2
Since implementing permit processing time standards, the Town consistently met its established review timelines. During this reporting period, all but two permits were processed within the applicable timeframes. The delays associated with these permits were attributable to administrative tracking and oversight issues that have since been identified and addressed through process improvements intended to strengthen permit monitoring and ensure continued compliance with adopted review timelines.

Permit Fees Collected. Figure 8 summarizes Building Division revenue for the Fourth quarter, totaling $591,267 in permit fees retained by the Town to support permitting and inspection services. This total excludes pass-through fees, such as State-mandated Seismic Safety and Green Building fees, which are collected by the Town and remitted to the State.

Compared to the previous quarter, fee revenue increased by approximately $83,683. This increase was primarily attributable to the issuance of larger and more complex building permits during the reporting period.

Permit Valuation. Figure 9 shows the total valuation of building permits issued during the Fourth quarter, which totaled approximately $12.290 million. Compared to the previous quarter, total permit valuation increased by approximately $3.726 million. This increase is primarily attributable to the issuance of larger, higher-valued, and more complex 0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
April May June Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Q4 Permits Received, Reviewed and Issued
Received In-House Plan Check 3rd Party Review Issued
Figure 7
$0.00
$100,000.00
$200,000.00
$300,000.00
$400,000.00
$500,000.00
$600,000.00
$700,000.00
April May June Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Figure 8 Q4 Permit Fees Collected
28

Item # 1.2
construction projects during the reporting period. Permit valuation is an important indicator of construction activity and economic investment within the community, contributes to the Town's property tax base, and generally correlates with increased building permit revenue because permit fees are based on project valuation in accordance with the Town's adopted fee schedule.

Permit Inspections. Figure 10 shows the number of building inspections conducted during the Fourth quarter. During the reporting period, Building Division staff completed a total of 1,063 permit inspections. Compared to the previous quarter, this represents a decrease of 62 inspections. This follows a similar trend from the prior reporting period, when inspection activity also declined by 62 inspections compared to the quarter before.

This reflects a modest reduction in construction activity over the past two quarters.

Building Division Public Information
The Building Division provides public information and guidance to residents, property owners, and business owners regarding building permits, inspections, and construction records for all parcels within the Town. Staff assist the public in understanding permit requirements, code compliance, and the permit process. Additionally, the Community $0.00
$2,000,000.00
$4,000,000.00
$6,000,000.00
$8,000,000.00
$10,000,000.00
$12,000,000.00
$14,000,000.00
April May June Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Q4 Permit Valuation
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
April May June Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Q4 Total Inspections
Figure 9
Figure 10
29

Item # 1.2
Development Department’s administrative staff manage the Residential Building Report program, providing property-specific information to support real estate transactions.

These services help ensure transparent public access to building information and support informed decision-making related to construction, property sales, and development.

Building Division Public Information. Figure 11 summarizes the types and volume of public inquiries handled by the Building Division. This data includes only emails sent to the general [email protected] address and does not include emails sent directly to individual staff members. During the reporting period, the Building Division handled a total of 1,443 public inquiries, including 52 counter inquiries, 351 phone calls, and 1,040 emails.

Compared to the previous quarter, there were 122 fewer counter inquiries, 25 fewer phone calls, and 315 fewer emails.

Figure 11
Notable Highlight
 Successfully recruited and onboarded two new Administrative/Permit Services Technicians to support Building Division operations and customer service.

CODE ENFORCEMENT
The Town of San Anselmo’s Code Enforcement staff provide public information and guidance by responding to resident inquiries, explaining applicable health, safety, and zoning codes, and advising property owners on compliance requirements. Staff help the public understand enforcement procedures, available remedies, and options for voluntary compliance, and issue citations or abate violations when necessary. These efforts promote transparency, community safety, and adherence to Town standards.

The Town continues to receive new complaints through its online “Report a Concern” form, accessible via the Town’s website: Form Center • Report a Concern.

Code Enforcement. Figure 12 summarizes the number and status of code enforcement complaints during the Fourth quarter of Fiscal Year 2025–2026. During the quarter, the Town received 82 new complaints, an increase of 10 complaints 0 500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Public Counter Phone Calls Emails Totals
Quarter 4 Building Division
Public Information Inquiries
Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
30

Item # 1.2
compared to the previous quarter. A total of 130 complaints were resolved or are in the process of being resolved, consistent with the previous quarter.

As of June 30, 2026, 518 active complaints remained under investigation or in the process of being resolved. Despite the slight increase in new complaints received, the Town continued to reduce its overall backlog, ending the quarter with 71 fewer active cases than the previous quarter.

Figure 12

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STATISTICS
In response to Town Council direction, the following section summarizes Department of Public Works permitting activity and public information statistics for the reporting period. The DPW is responsible for permitting related to the following:
 Fence Permit
 Grading and Hauling, Bio-Retention, and Stormwater Management  Encroachment Permits
 Tree Permits
 Parklet Permits
 Memorial Bench Permit
DPW Permits Received and Issued. Figure 13 illustrates the number of permits received and issued by the Department of Public Works during the reporting period.

A total of 153 permits were received and 130 permits were issued. Compared to the previous quarter, the Fourth quarter saw an increase of 14 permit applications received and an increase of 14 permits were issued.
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Q4 Received Code Violations and Status
Received Resolved or In Progress
31

Item # 1.2
Figure 13
DPW Permit Fees and Valuation. Figure 14 shows that DPW collected $88,296 in permit fees during the Fourth quarter, representing a total project valuation of $601,465. Compared to the previous quarter, permit fee revenue increased by $26,865, while total project valuation decreased by $143,377. Like the previous quarter, the increase in permit fees, despite the decrease in valuation, reflects a higher volume of lower-valued DPW permits issued during the quarter.

Figure 14
DPW Public Information
The DPW provides public information and guidance to residents, property owners, and business owners regarding DPW permits as previously described and related inspections. Staff also assist the public in understanding permit requirements, code 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
April May June Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Q4 DPW Permits Received and Issued
Received Issued
$-
$100,000.00
$200,000.00
$300,000.00
$400,000.00
$500,000.00
$600,000.00
$700,000.00
$800,000.00
$900,000.00
$1,000,000.00
Fees Permit Valuation
Q4 DPW Fees and Valuation
Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
32

Item # 1.2
compliance, and the related permit process.

DPW Public Information. Figure 15 shows the types and number of public inquiries handled by the Department of Public Works. During this period, DPW handled 36 counter inquiries. Because DPW public information inquiries were not tracked during the first quarter, the second quarter serves as the baseline for comparison purposes.

Figure 15
Notable Highlights
 Resilience Hub was officially completed.
 Advanced key Public Works infrastructure and maintenance projects through the award of contracts for the 2026 Slurry Seal, Street Resurfacing, and ICC Painting projects.

CONCLUSION
The Fourth quarter reflects a moderation in overall development activity, with building permit volumes slowing while permit revenues remained steady. Planning application activity experienced a slight decline during the quarter, while the Department of Public Works experienced increased permit activity and revenues despite lower overall project valuations. Staff continued advancing key Town priorities, including the General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan Update, Housing Element implementation, and comprehensive municipal code updates to maintain compliance with evolving State laws. In addition, the Town continued making steady progress in reducing the code enforcement backlog while maintaining responsive permitting, inspection, and public information services. Staff will continue monitoring development trends, identifying opportunities to improve operational efficiency and customer service, and reporting progress to the Town Council through future quarterly reports.

ATTACHMENT
None
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 Q4 Q3 Q2
Q4 Public Counter Visits
33 Item 1.3

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item 1.3
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Consideration and Adoption of Amendments to the Robson-Harrington Community Garden Rules and
Bylaws
FROM: Veronica Hillard, Recreation Supervisor
Mattie O’Grady, Director of Community Services
RECOMMENDATION: That the Town Council review and adopt the amended Rules and Bylaws of the Robson Harrington Community Gardens Steering Committee.

BACKGROUND
The Town of San Anselmo owns and oversees the community gardens at RobsonHarrington Park, which were established in the 1970s. Approximately 29 years ago, the Town entered into an agreement with the Community Garden Steering Committee to assist with the management and operation of the gardens.

In 2022, the Town adopted updated Rules and Bylaws to support effective administration of the Community Garden. Staff now propose additional amendments to the Rules and Bylaws based on recommendations from the Community Garden Steering Committee.

On April 15, 2026, the Community Garden Steering Committee proposed amendments intended to improve consistency and transparency and to clarify gardeners’ responsibilities for maintaining the community garden.

On April 21, 2026, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed amended Rules and Bylaws and recommended approval, subject to several minor revisions.

On August 12, 2026, the Community Garden Steering Committee reviewed the Parks and Recreation Commission’s recommended revisions. The Committee unanimously approved the final Rules and Bylaws and recommended that they be forwarded to the Town Council for final consideration and adoption.
34 Item 1.3

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The Community Garden Steering Committee would like to propose more concrete rules and clarifications to the current bylaws and rules to reduce ambiguity and ensure consistent interpretation. Most proposed changes are minor and specific to the operation of the community garden.

The Steering Committee has brought forward these changes due to challenges in issuing notices to gardeners who are out of compliance, as each matter currently requires discussion and a formal vote at a Community Garden Steering Committee meeting. Because the Committee meets only four times per year, many infractions occur between meetings and cannot be addressed in a timely manner. In addition, there are recurring instances of noncompliance involving gardeners who do not adequately maintain their plots.

To improve accountability and support the overall health of the garden, the subcommittee proposes establishing a defined timeframe within the existing three-strike policy. The subcommittee also recommends forming an enforcement subcommittee authorized to communicate with gardeners regarding compliance issues and to issue first- and second-strike notices. Issuance of a final strike and any decision regarding removal from the garden would remain subject to review and approval by the Community Garden Steering Committee. The subcommittee also recommends forming a smaller enforcement subcommittee authorized to communicate with gardeners regarding compliance issues and to issue first and second-strike notices. Issuance of a final strike and any decision regarding removal from the garden would remain subject to review and approval by the Community Garden Steering Committee.

Key Findings to Changes in Bylaws:
• Garden Dues: Establishes prorated dues for new gardeners who join mid-year. If a member joins during the gardening year, dues will be the full annual amount if there are seven or more months remaining, or 50% of the annual dues if there are six or fewer months remaining.
• By Laws to be Removed: Suggestion to remove the plot reassignment section and specified dues amounts, as these may change due to increases in water pricing and garden reconfiguration.
• Membership Section Bylaw Addition: All new members must be selected from the waitlist. Gardeners may not add another individual who does not reside at the same residence to co-manage a plot, nor may they sublet their plot. An exception may be made if the plot coordinator facilitates a plot share for an existing gardener using either a name from the waitlist or a current member. • Gardener Relocating to a Different Plot Bylaw Addition: Gardeners in good standing may transfer to an available plot based on seniority. They must leave their current plot in good standing.
35 Item 1.3
Key Findings to Changes and Additions to Garden Rules:
• New Rule – Gardener Relocating to a Different Plot: Gardeners in good standing may transfer to an available plot based on seniority. They must leave their current plot in compliance with garden rules and complete the transfer within two weeks of the new assignment, unless otherwise approved by the Steering Committee.
• Small Changes-Rules have been revised to clarify expectations regarding driving on garden property during programming, as well as requirements for weeding, general upkeep, and the number of volunteer hours expected. • Three-Strike Policy Update: The most significant change is the formalization of the three-strike rule with a defined timeline. To improve accountability and support the overall health of the garden, the subcommittee proposes establishing a timeframe within the existing policy. The subcommittee also recommends forming an enforcement subcommittee authorized to issue first- and secondstrike notices, while final strikes and removal decisions remain subject to approval by the Community Garden Steering Committee.

CONCLUSION
Staff recommend that the Town Council review and adopt the amended Rules and Bylaws.

CEQA AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Council’s discussion and approval of this report is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act, because it does not involve an activity which has the potential to cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21065).

Attachment 1 – v1 Community Gardens Redlined Rules
Attachment 2 – v2 Parks and Recreation Commission Redlined Rules Attachment 3 – Final Rules
Attachment 4 – v1 Community Gardens Redlined Bylaws
Attachment 5 – v2 Parks and Recreation Commission Redlined Bylaws Attachment 6 – Final Bylaws
36 San Anselmo Community Garden Rules
Mission Statement::

The San Anselmo Community Garden at Robson-Harrington Park (SACG or Garden) will endeavor to create a sharing and learning environment in a productive, well-maintained community garden where its members are committed to organic gardening practices, stewardship of soil and water, and in cooperation with others for the enjoyment of all.

COMMUNITY GARDEN RULES

1. Code of Conduct: The code is a tool for understanding and upholding acceptable, safe, and respectful standards for community garden members. a. Model behavior that respects the human rights of all people: (Put the bullet in as a.)
● Treat all community members and garden visitors with respect, courtesy, and dignity.
b. Use reasonable care to protect and safeguard Robson Garden property. c. Follow the rules established by the town for The Robson-Harrington Park.

2. Annual Dues: Annual dues are currently $154.00. Annual dues payments are due by the beginning of the Community Garden fiscal year, by November 1st. Payment is due by the Fall meeting. Members will be contacted immediately if Dues are not paid by that meeting date. Dues 14 days past due are grounds for expulsion. There are SsScholarship funds are available through the San Anselmo Parks and Recreation Department.

3. General Meetings: There is a minimum of two per year. Members are required to attend at least one meeting per year.

4. Community Garden Work Days: All gardeners are expected to help with tasks that benefit the community garden. Plot gardeners are required to volunteer 8 hours minimum annually to the Work days, per plot. Everyone is required to participate in the work days. There will be a minimum of threewo work days per year. Gardeners must attend at least one workday per year. Members unable to participate in any given workday should contact the plot coordinator for tasks to perform.. Each garden member with their own plot is expected to perform a minimum of 4 hours of work each 37 work day. If two unrelated people share a plot, the expectation is that each person will perform a minimum of 4 hours of work each work day. Those members unable to participate on the scheduled work day are required to put in at least 4 hours to complete a task, either in advance of the work day, or within 30 days after the work day.

The member must contact the work day coordinator to select a task. Sample jobs include weeding and pruning plants in common areas and repairing fences.

It is the members responsibility to document work performed on the Working/Attendance Roster. The W/A Roster will be available at the workdays, at Meetings and accessible on line on the SACG Google Docs page.

5. Gardener Relocating to Different Plot: Gardeners in good standing can transfer to an available plot as seniority allows. They must leave the condition of their current plot in compliance with the rules. They must complete the transfer within 2 weeks of the new assignment, unless otherwise approved by the Steering Committee.

Garden Plots:

65. Maintenance: Members should maintain their plot in a productive state, either with vegetables, flowers, herbs, or cover crops that do not shade or impede infringe on any other plot. Crops must be harvested when ripe and not allowed to rot on plants.

Deadhead perennial plants each spring.
● If you will be absent from your plot, it is your responsibility to arrange for your plot to be maintained by someone else and for a period no longer than 3 months, except in circumstances of medical exigency. You must notify the Steering Committee of an arrangement that is longer than 42 weeks.

76. Structures in plots: Growing Raised beds shall be constructed with wood only.

Except for seasonal tomato cages and trellis that do not impede on neighboring plots, no structure may be erected in a plot taller than 6 feet and must blend harmoniously with the Robson Park property. Any structure taller than 3 feet that is not for the purpose of seasonal growing is subject to Steering Committee and Parks and Recreation Department approval. All structures must be easily removable and must be removed when the plot is vacated.

87. Toxic Materials: Chemical pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, and neonicotinoids are not allowed. Garden beds will be constructed with non-pressure treated lumber only. Existing PT lumber should be phased out as soon as possible. 38 98. Soil: Replenish annually with at least 1” or more of organic matter such as compost or manure.
109. Invasive Plants: Avoid invasive plants and vines—any kind of plant that takes over and spreads. Invasive plants and vines include, but are not limited to: ornamental grasses, oxalis, fennel, horseradish, mint, dandelion, Jerusalem artichoke, passionflower vine and perennial morning glory vine. The Marin Master Gardeners website has information on invasive plants. Growing marijuana, for any purpose, is prohibited.
1110. Weeds: Maintain a weed-free plot, including the edges of your plot a foot around the fenceline of your plot. Do not allow weeds to spread by seed or invasion. 1211. Plant Debris: Put all plant debris in the green bins; do not dump in the common areas or outside the green bins. When all the green bins are full, members have permission to fill empty black cans. Use the ones that have NO lid first. 1312. Containers: Members may keep no more than 5 empty containers, such as buckets, and 1 tightly closed storage container per plot. Store tomato cages and stakes together and keep tools tidy and in a manner that does not invite or shelter pests. 1413. Rodents, Mosquitos, Pests: Members shall not maintain any condition in their plot which allows rodents, mosquitos, or other pests a permanent home. e.g., No standing or stored water. such as bird baths; No piles of stored material that give rodents cover and habitat.
1514. Water: Do not waste it! Members pay our total water bill. ● Use mulch and drip irrigation when possible.
● Always turn off the main shut-off valve at the top of the garden when you leave to avoid pipe breaks leading to high water bills. Before turning off the main valve, shout water and listen for a response.
● Plot holder or designee must be in the garden if water is on. ● All irrigation systems should have a manual timer. If water is found left on and no one is in the plot, the system will be shut off.
39 ● Fix or report all dripping and leaking faucets and hose bibs. ● Minimize watering outside of your plot.
● All plots must comply with MMWD and San Anselmo water restrictions, including all hoses that must have shut-off valves.
1615. Trees in Common Areas: Trees in common areas are not to be touched/removed, or altered or planted without the approval of the Steering Committee and the Parks and Recreation Department.
1716. Trees in Plots: No trees are to be planted in plots. Current existing trees should be pruned to 6 feet in height or removed.
1817. Picking: Don’t pick in other plots without permission.what you didn’t grow. 1918. Family members and Pets in the Garden: Children and pets must be supervised at all times. Members must keep dogs on a leash when it is in their shared plot areas.
2019. Loading Zone Parking: Access to the loading zone Parking is not allowed in the Robson-Harrington parking area Monday – Friday, 3 pm – 6 pm, during the school year or whenever the chain is across the driveway. These parking rules may change over time, and members are responsible for complying with posted signs. 210. Plot Inspections. The Steering Committee will conduct quarterly inspections to determine whether garden plots are in compliance with the Garden Rules. 221. Safety: Members must maintain all common areas in a safe condition. 232. Changes to Garden Rules: The Steering Committee and the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department must approve all changes to the Garden Rules with notice to the San Anselmo Town Council.

Gardeners or Plots in Violation of Garden Rules ¶
¶
Members will be out of compliance with the Garden Rules if any of the following conditions exist:¶
a Code of Conduct is violated. ¶
b Failure to attend at least 1 meeting annually. ¶
40 ¶
c Failure to attend or participate in all the work days or common area maintenance. ¶
d Failure to pay annual dues by the Fall meeting. ¶
e Garden Plot is out of compliance. ¶
¶
Process to Address Noncompliance: ¶
¶
When a member is out of compliance with the Garden Rules, they will be given the opportunity to correct per the below process. ¶
¶

1. 1st incident: A representative of the Steering Committee will contact the noncompliant member by phone and email to alert the member of the violation.

Because every circumstance is unique, a solution including a deadline for compliance will be agreed upon and documented in an email.¶

2. 2nd Incident: The member will be contacted by phone and email and in the same manner as#1, but with a notice that the plot will be revoked if there are any further infractions.¶

3. 3rd incident: The member’s plot privileges will be immediately revoked.¶ ¶
¶
Failure to comply or correct violation(s) within the allotted time agreed upon by the member and the Steering Committee will result in the loss of the gardener’s plot.

Whether the member can go back on the waiting list will be determined by the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department. When a gardener has their privileges revoked, they will not be reimbursed dues or for the cost of the structures or plants in the plot. A gardener whose membership privileges have been revoked may file an appeal with the Parks and Recreation Commission within 30 days of the date that notice of the revocation is mailed. ¶
Approved by Town Council: 10.11.22
Gardeners or Plots in Violation of the Garden Rules
Adhering to the rules is a vital part of the privilege of being in the community garden. In accordance with our mission statement, it is the steering committee’s goal to help gardeners be successful while maintaining the standards set by the Parks and Recreation Commission.

The membership cooperation is paramount to that success. Should it become necessary to formally address any rule violations, a set procedure will be followed. 41 PROCESS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE
When a member or their plot is out of compliance, they will be given 2 opportunities to address and correct the violation. If 2 notices have been unsuccessful, the third notice will be a notice of eviction.

A letter will be sent from 2 sources from the Parks and Recreation Department, email and postal service.

There is a form letter used for the process that includes the following:

1. The status or strike distinction - 1, 2, or notice of eviction.

2. The rule(s) violated.

3. The process for fixing the situation.

4. A deadline for compliance.

5. A means of communication for discussion.

Letters for out of compliance are cumulative.

1. Failure to communicate and correct the violation(s) in a letter will trigger another strike letter.

2. Repeating the same violation(s) will trigger a second strike letter.

3. A different violation within the same 3 year period as the first strike, will trigger a second strike letter.

4. A strike will expire after 3 years from the date on the letter.

A gardener whose membership privileges have been revoked may file an appeal with the Parks and Recreation Commission within 30 days of the date of the eviction. Dues and plot materials are not eligible for reimbursement. Whether the member can go back on the waitlist will be determined with the appeal.

Other Recommendations
Propose a Subcommittee to Address the strike letter process facilitation The difficulty for the Steering is deciding to address violations with letters in a timely manner and that does not violate the Brown Act. To carry out this business we propose creating a permanent subcommittee of 2 Steering members to be tasked with this process. They will report at the quarterly steering meetings.

The committee will be tasked with:

1. Inspecting the garden plots regularly.

2. Determining whether a letter is necessary.

3. Adhere to the process for the letter in the rules.
42 4. Keeping records.

5. Updating Steering and reporting actions taken in a manner that does not violate Brown Act.

6. The third strike must be decided by the full Steering Committee. 43 San Anselmo Community Garden Rules
Mission Statement:

The San Anselmo Community Garden at Robson-Harrington Park (SACG or Garden) will endeavor to create a sharing and learning environment in a productive, well-maintained community garden where its members are committed to organic gardening practices, stewardship of soil and water, and in cooperation with others for the enjoyment of all.

COMMUNITY GARDEN RULES

1. Code of Conduct: The code is a tool for understanding and upholding acceptable, safe, and respectful standards for community garden members. a. Treat all community members and garden visitors with respect, courtesy, and dignity.
b. Use reasonable care to protect and safeguard Robson Garden property. c. Follow the rules established by the town for The Robson-Harrington Park.

2. Annual Dues: Annual dues payments are due by the beginning of the Community Garden fiscal year, which isby November 1st. Members will be contacted immediately if Dues are not paid by that meeting date. Dues 14 days past due are grounds for expulsion. Scholarship funds are available through the San Anselmo Parks and Recreation Department.

3. General Meetings: There is a minimum of two per year. Members are required to attend at least one meeting per year.

4. Community Garden Work DaysWorkdays: All gardeners are expected to help with tasks that benefit the community garden. There will be a minimum of three work daysworkdays per year. Plot gardeners are required to volunteer 8 hours minimum annually to the workdaysWork days, per plot. Gardeners must attend at least one workday per year. Members unable to participate in any given workday should contact the plot coordinator for tasks to perform.

It is the members responsibility to document work performed on the Working/Attendance Roster. The W/A Roster will be available at the workdays, and accessible on line on the SACG Google Docs page.

5. Gardener Relocating to Different Plot: Gardeners in good standing can transfer to an available plot as seniority allows. They must leave the condition of their current plot in compliance with the rules. They must complete the transfer within 2 weeks of the new assignment, unless otherwise approved by the Steering Committee. 44 Garden Plots:

6. Maintenance: Members should maintain their plot in a productive state, either with vegetables, flowers, herbs, or cover crops that do not shade or infringe on any other plot.

Crops must be harvested when ripe and not allowed to rot on plants. Deadhead perennial plants each spring.
● If you will be absent from your plot, it is your responsibility to arrange for your plot to be maintained by someone else and for a period no longer than 3 months, except in circumstances of medical exigency. You must notify the Steering Committee of an arrangement that is longer than 4 weeks.

7. Structures in plots: Raised beds shall be constructed with wood only. Except for seasonal tomato cages and trellis that do not impede on neighboring plots, no structure may be erected in a plot taller than 6 feet and must blend harmoniously with the Robson Park property. Any structure taller than 3 feet that is not for the purpose of seasonal growing is subject to Steering Committee and Parks and Recreation Department approval. All structures must be easily removable and must be removed when the plot is vacated.

8. Toxic Materials: Chemical pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, and neonicotinoids are not allowed. Garden beds will be constructed with non-pressure treated lumber only. Existing PT lumber should be phased out as soon as possible.

9. Soil: Replenish annually with at least 1” or more of organic matter such as compost or manure.

10. Invasive Plants: Avoid invasive plants and vines—any kind of plant that takes over and spreads. Invasive plants and vines include, but are not limited to: ornamental grasses, oxalis, fennel, horseradish, mint, dandelion, Jerusalem artichoke, passionflower vine and perennial morning glory vine. The Marin Master Gardeners website has information on invasive plants. Growing marijuana, for any purpose, is prohibited.

11. Weeds: Maintain a weed-free plot, including a foot around the fenceline of your plot.

Do not allow weeds to spread by seed or invasion.

12. Plant Debris: Put all plant debris in the green bins; do not dump in the common areas or outside the green bins. When all the green bins are full, members have permission to fill empty black cans.

13. Containers: Members may keep no more than 5 empty containers, such as buckets, and 1 tightly closed storage container per plot. Store tomato cages and stakes together and keep tools tidy and in a manner that does not invite or shelter pests. 45 14. Rodents, Mosquitos, Pests: Members shall not maintain any condition in their plot which allows rodents, mosquitos, or other pests a permanent home. No standing or stored water. No piles of stored material that give rodents cover and habitat.

15. Water: Do not waste it! Members pay our total water bill. a. Always turn off the main shut-off valve at the top of the garden when you leave to avoid pipe breaks leading to high water bills. Before turning off the main valve, shout water and listen for a response.
b. Plot holder or designee must be in the garden if water is on. c. All irrigation systems should have a manual timer. If water is found left on and no one is in the plot, the system will be shut off. d. Fix or report all dripping and leaking faucets and hose bibs. e. Minimize watering outside of your plot.
f. All plots must comply with MMWD and San Anselmo water restrictions, including all hoses that must have shut-off valves.
g. Use mulch and drip irrigation when possible.

16. Trees in Common Areas: Trees in common areas are not to be removed, altered or planted without the approval of the Steering Committee and the Parks and Recreation Department.

17. Trees in Plots: No trees are to be planted in plots. Current existing trees should be pruned to 6 feet in height or removed.

18. Picking: Don’t pick in other plots without the gardener’s permission.

19. Family members and Pets in the Garden: Children and pets must be supervised at all times. Members must keep dogs on a leash when it is in shared plot areas.

20. Loading Zone: Access to the loading zone is not allowed in the Robson-Harrington parking area Monday – Friday, 3 pm – 6 pm, during the school year or whenever the chain is across the driveway. These rules may change over time, and members are responsible for complying with posted signs.

21. Plot Inspections. The Steering Committee will conduct quarterly inspections to determine whether garden plots are in compliance with the Garden Rules.

22. Safety: Members must maintain all common areas in a safe condition. 46 23. Changes to Garden Rules: The Steering Committee and the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department must approve all changes to the Garden Rules with notice to the San Anselmo Town Council.

Gardeners or Plots in Violation of the Garden Rules
Adhering to the rules is a vital part of the privilege of being in the community garden. In accordance with our mission statement, it is the steering committee’s goal to help gardeners be successful while maintaining the standards set by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The membership cooperation is paramount to that success. Should it become necessary to formally address any rule violations, a set procedure will be followed.

PROCESS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE
When a member or their plot is out of compliance, they will be given 2 opportunities to address and correct the violation. If 2 notices have been unsuccessful, the third notice will be a notice of eviction.

A letter will be sent from 2 sources from the Parks and Recreation Department, email and postal service.

There is a form letter used for the process that includes the following:

1. The status or strike distinction - 1, 2, or notice of eviction.

2. The rule(s) violated.

3. The process for fixing the situation.

4. A deadline for compliance.

5. A means of communication for discussion.

Letters for out of compliance are cumulative.

1. Failure to communicate and correct the violation(s) in a letter will trigger another strike letter.

2. Repeating the same violation(s) will trigger a second strike letter.

3. A different violation within the same 3 2-year period as the first strike, will trigger a second strike letter.

4. A strike will expire after 32 years from the date on the letter.

4.5. The Steering Committee may appoint a subcommittee of 2 Steering Committee member to address violations of the Garden Rules in a timely manner.

A gardener whose membership privileges have been revoked may file an appeal with the Parks and Recreation Commission within 30 days of the date of the eviction. Dues and plot materials are not eligible for reimbursement. Whether the member can go back on the waitlist will be determined with the appeal.
47 Other Recommendation from the subcommittee
Propose a Subcommittee to Address the strike letter process facilitation The difficulty for the Steering is deciding to address violations with letters in a timely manner and that does not violate the Brown Act. To carry out this business we propose creating a permanent subcommittee of 2 Steering members to be tasked with this process. They will report at the quarterly steering meetings.

The committee will be tasked with:

1. Inspecting the garden plots regularly.

2. Determining whether a letter is necessary.

3. Adhere to the process for the letter in the rules.

4. Keeping records.

5. Updating Steering and reporting actions taken in a manner that does not violate Brown Act.

6.1. The third strike must be decided by the full Steering Committee. 48 San Anselmo Community Garden Rules
MISSION STATEMENT:

The San Anselmo Community Garden at Robson-Harrington Park (SACG or Garden) will endeavor to create a sharing and learning environment in a productive, wellmaintained community garden where its members are committed to organic gardening practices, stewardship of soil and water, and in cooperation with others for the enjoyment of all.

COMMUNITY GARDEN RULES

1. Code of Conduct: The code is a tool for understanding and upholding acceptable, safe, and respectful standards for community garden members.
a. Treat all community members and garden visitors with respect, courtesy, and dignity.
b. Use reasonable care to protect and safeguard Robson Garden property.
c. Follow the rules established by the town for Robson-Harrington Park.

2. Annual Dues: Annual dues payments are due by the beginning of the Community Garden fiscal year, which is November 1st. Members will be contacted immediately if Dues are not paid by that meeting. Dues 14 days past due are grounds for expulsion. Scholarship funds are available through the San Anselmo Parks and Recreation Department.

3. General Meetings: There is a minimum of two per year. Members are required to attend at least one meeting per year.

4. Community Garden Workdays: All gardeners are expected to help with tasks that benefit the community garden. There will be a minimum of three workdays per year. Plot gardeners are required to volunteer 8 hours minimum annually to the workdays, per plot. Gardeners must attend at least one workday per year. Members unable to participate in any given workday should contact the plot coordinator for tasks to perform.

It is the members’ responsibility to document work performed on the Working/Attendance Roster. The W/A Roster will be available at the workdays, and accessible online on the SACG Google Docs page.

5. Gardener Relocating to Different Plot: Gardeners in good standing can transfer to an available plot as seniority allows. They must leave the condition of their current plot in compliance with the rules. They must 49 complete the transfer within 2 weeks of the new assignment, unless otherwise approved by the Steering Committee.

Garden Plots:

6. Maintenance: Members should maintain their plot in a productive state, either with vegetables, flowers, herbs, or cover crops that do not shade or infringe on any other plot. Crops must be harvested when ripe and not allowed to rot on plants. Deadhead perennial plants each spring. • If you will be absent from your plot, it is your responsibility to arrange for your plot to be maintained by someone else and for a period no longer than 3 months, except in circumstances of medical exigency. You must notify the Steering Committee of an arrangement that is longer than 4 weeks.

7. Structures in plots: Raised beds shall be constructed with wood only.

Except for seasonal tomato cages and trellis that do not impede on neighboring plots, no structure may be erected in a plot taller than 6 feet and must blend harmoniously with the Robson Park property. Any structure taller than 3 feet that is not for the purpose of seasonal growing is subject to Steering Committee and Parks and Recreation Department approval. All structures must be easily removable and must be removed when the plot is vacated.

8. Toxic Materials: Chemical pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, and neonicotinoids are not allowed. Garden beds will be constructed with non-pressure treated lumber only. Existing PT lumber should be phased out as soon as possible.

9. Soil: Replenish annually with at least 1” or more of organic matter such as compost or manure.

10. Invasive Plants: Avoid invasive plants and vines—any kind of plant that takes over and spreads. Invasive plants and vines include, but are not limited to: ornamental grasses, oxalis, fennel, horseradish, mint, dandelion, Jerusalem artichoke, passionflower vine and perennial morning glory vine. The Marin Master Gardeners website has information on invasive plants. Growing marijuana, for any purpose, is prohibited.

11. Weeds: Maintain a weed-free plot, including a foot around the fenceline of your plot. Do not allow weeds to spread by seed or invasion.

12. Plant Debris: Put all plant debris in the green bins; do not dump in the common areas or outside the green bins. When all the green bins are full, members have permission to fill empty black cans.
50 13. Containers: Members may keep no more than 5 empty containers, such as buckets, and 1 tightly closed storage container per plot. Store tomato cages and stakes together and keep tools tidy and in a manner that does not invite or shelter pests.

14. Rodents, Mosquitos, Pests: Members shall not maintain any condition in their plot which allows rodents, mosquitoes, or other pests a permanent home. No standing or stored water. No piles of stored material that give rodents cover and habitat.

15. Water: Do not waste it! Members pay our total water bill. a. Always turn off the main shut-off valve at the top of the garden when you leave to avoid pipe breaks leading to high water bills.

Before turning off the main valve, shout water and listen for a response.
b. Plot holder or designee must be in the garden if water is on. c. All irrigation systems should have a manual timer. If water is found left on and no one is in the plot, the system will be shut off. d. Fix or report all dripping and leaking faucets and hose bibs. e. Minimize watering outside of your plot.
f. All plots must comply with MMWD and San Anselmo water restrictions, including all hoses that must have shut-off valves. g. Use mulch and drip irrigation when possible.

16. Trees in Common Areas: Trees in common areas are not to be removed, altered or planted without the approval of the Steering Committee and the Parks and Recreation Department.

17. Trees in Plots: No trees are to be planted in plots. Current existing trees should be pruned to 6 feet in height or removed.

18. Picking: Don’t pick in other plots without the gardener’s permission.

19. Family members and Pets in the Garden: Children and pets must be supervised at all times. Members must keep dogs on a leash when it is in shared plot areas.

20. Loading Zone: Access to the loading zone is not allowed in the RobsonHarrington parking area Monday – Friday, 3 pm – 6 pm, during the school year or whenever the chain is across the driveway. These rules may change over time, and members are responsible for complying with posted signs.

21. Plot Inspections. The Steering Committee will conduct quarterly inspections to determine whether garden plots are in compliance with the Garden Rules.
51 22. Safety: Members must maintain all common areas in a safe condition.

23. Changes to Garden Rules: The Steering Committee and the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department must approve all changes to the Garden Rules with notice to the San Anselmo Town Council.

GARDENERS OR PLOTS IN VIOLATION OF THE GARDEN RULES
Adhering to the rules is a vital part of the privilege of being in the community garden. In accordance with our mission statement, it is the steering committee’s goal to help gardeners be successful while maintaining the standards set by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The membership cooperation is paramount to that success. Should it become necessary to formally address any rule violations, a set procedure will be followed.

PROCESS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE
When a member or their plot is out of compliance, they will be given 2 opportunities to address and correct the violation. If 2 notices have been unsuccessful, the third notice will be a notice of eviction.

A letter will be sent from 2 sources from the Parks and Recreation Department, email and postal service.

There is a form letter used for the process that includes the following:

1. The status or strike distinction - 1, 2, or notice of eviction.

2. The rule(s) violated.

3. The process for fixing the situation.

4. A deadline for compliance.

5. A means of communication for discussion.

Letters for out-of-compliance are cumulative.

1. Failure to communicate and correct the violation(s) in a letter will trigger another strike letter.

2. Repeating the same violation(s) will trigger a second strike letter.

3. A different violation within the same 2-year period as the first strike will trigger a second strike letter.

4. A strike will expire after 2 years from the date on the letter.

5. The Steering Committee may appoint a subcommittee of 2 Steering Committee members to address violations of the Garden Rules in a timely manner.

A gardener whose membership privileges have been revoked may file an appeal with the Parks and Recreation Commission within 30 days of the date of the eviction. Dues and plot materials are not eligible for reimbursement. Whether the member can go back on the waitlist will be determined with the appeal.

Approved by Town Council:
52 San Anselmo Community Garden Bylaws

MISSION STATEMENT
The San Anselmo Community Garden at Robson-Harrington Park (SACG or Garden) will endeavor to create a sharing and learning environment in a productive, well-maintained community garden where its members are committed to organic gardening practices, stewardship of soil and water, and in cooperation with others for the enjoyment of all.

GARDEN GOVERNANCE
The San Anselmo Parks and Recreation Department will have oversight of the Garden.

A Steering Committee appointed by the Parks and Recreation Commission will help develop policies and coordinate garden activities. The Steering Committee shall consist of 3 or more gardeners and at least one staff member of the Parks and Recreation Department as a nonvoting member. Steering Committee members will serve for a minimum term of 2 years. A member of the Steering Committee shall be designated as a liaison with the Friends of Robson Park. The Steering Committee will meet quarterly, and its meetings must comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act.

Changes to these Bylaws should be recommended to the Steering Committee and/or Parks and Recreation Department. The Parks and Recreation Commission must approve all changes.

GARDEN DESCRIPTION AND MEMBERSHIP
The SACG is a recreational facility that belongs to the Town of San Anselmo and is controlled by the San Anselmo Parks and Recreation Department.

The garden is located at the Robson-Harrington Park in San Anselmo, California. The Community garden fiscal year is November 1 - October 31.

New members of the garden must be residents of San Anselmo, and they must continue as residents to retain their garden membership. Current non-resident members as of 10/2022of the garden may continue their garden membership. provided 10 additional plots are created by January 1, 2024. This may be accomplished in a variety of ways, including creating new plots in empty spaces within the garden, dividing existing plots, sharing plots, or reconfiguring plots, provided, however, that no A mmember’s plot shall not be subdivided, taken, or otherwise interfered with without the gardener’s his or her consent.The foregoing provision shall not apply to the process regarding any violation of the community garden rules. 53 A Waiting List for garden membership will be maintained by the Parks and Recreation Department. San Anselmo residents may add their names to the Waiting List anytime during the year. All new members to the garden will come from the wait list. Gardeners may not bring in another gardener who does not live at the same residence to comanage nor may they sublet their plot. The exception to this would be the plot coordinator facilitating a plot share for an existing gardener with either a name from the wait list or from the current roster.

ANNUAL DUES
Members will pay annual dues. Dues are determined by the Town of San Anselmo. as follows: ¶ Annual Dues: $154
*San Anselmo nonprofit organizations are eligible for a waiver of the annual dues.

If a member joins the Garden during the gardening year, the annual dues will be the full annual amount $150 if there are 7 or more months remaining. Or 50% of the annual dues or $75 if there are 6 or fewer months remaining. Dues are non-refundable. ¶ The Town of San Anselmo (Town) will collect the annual dues, which will be placed in an account for the Garden. The Town will maintain a checking account for the Garden. The Steering Committee may request disbursements from the account., which must be approved by the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department.

PLOT ASSIGNMENT
The annual renewal process and plot assignments will occur prior to the start of the gardening season as designated by the Parks and Recreation Department.

Gardening season begins on February 1st of each year.

The Steering Committee and the Parks and Recreation Department will be responsible for creating, assigning, and configuring garden plots. Renewing gardeners will continue in the be reassigned the plot they gardened the previous year.

Available plots will be assigned to new gardeners from the Waiting List.

All structures in garden plots must be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. ¶

REQUIREMENTS FOR GARDENERS TO REMAIN IN GOOD STANDING
The Garden requires active participation.Ggardeners shall followshall to follow the Garden Rules established by the San Anselmo Town Council or the Parks and Recs commission.

Following is the minimum required of each gardener who desires to be a member of the garden community. ¶
1) 1) Be an active gardener¶
54 2) 2) Follow all the garden rules¶
3) Participate in Community Service

COMMUNITY SERVICE
In addition to plot and pathway maintenance, all gardeners are expected to volunteer in the garden. This includes annual garden cleanup days, teaching classes, or any activity deemed appropriate by the Parks and Recreation Department and/or the Steering Committee. Alternate tasks will be assigned to those unable to participate in organized activities.

In addition, it is a goal of the Garden to grow, harvest and contribute food to designated community organizations. A collection bin will be available, and gardeners are encouraged to place vegetables into the bins. Garden volunteers will donate them to designated community organizations. Vegetables should not be left unpicked in garden plots. Each gardener should designate an alternate gardener to pick and donate vegetables from his/her plot rather than let them spoil.

If the community demand for a garden plot is low (waiting list below 10) a Community Plot can be set aside, and its produce will be contributed to designated organizations within the county.

The Community Plot may be used for Parks and Recreation Department programmingprograming.

Approved by Town Council: 10.11.22
55 San Anselmo Community Garden Bylaws

MISSION STATEMENT
The San Anselmo Community Garden at Robson-Harrington Park (SACG or Garden) will endeavor to create a sharing and learning environment in a productive, well-maintained community garden where its members are committed to organic gardening practices, stewardship of soil and water, and in cooperation with others for the enjoyment of all.

GARDEN GOVERNANCE
The San Anselmo Parks and Recreation Department will have oversight of the Garden.

A Steering Committee appointed by the Parks and Recreation Commission will help develop policies and coordinate garden activities. The Steering Committee shall consist of 3 or more gardeners and at least one staff member of the Parks and Recreation Department as a nonvoting member. Steering Committee members will serve for a minimum term of 2 years.

The Steering Committee will meet quarterly, and its meetings must comply with the Ralph M.

Brown Act.

Changes to these Bylaws should be recommended to the Steering Committee and/or Parks and Recreation Department. The Parks and Recreation Commission must approve all changes.

GARDEN DESCRIPTION AND MEMBERSHIP
The SACG is a recreational facility that belongs to the Town of San Anselmo and is controlled by the San Anselmo Parks and Recreation Department. The garden is located at the RobsonHarrington Park in San Anselmo, California.

The Community Garden fiscal year is November 1 - October 31.

New members of the garden must be residents of San Anselmo, and they must continue as residents to retain their garden membership. Non-resident members as of October 31, 2022,10/2022 may continue their garden membership.

A member’s plot shall not be subdivided, taken, or otherwise interfered with without the gardener’s consent. The foregoing provision shall not apply to the process regarding any violation of the community garden rules.

A Waiting List for garden membership will be maintained by the Parks and Recreation Department. San Anselmo residents may add their names to the Waiting List anytime during the year. All new members to the garden will come from the wait list. 56 Gardeners may not bring in another gardener who does not live at the same residence to comanage their plot, nor may they sublet their plot. The exception to this would be the plot coordinator facilitating a plot share for an existing gardener with either a name from the wait list or from the current roster.

ANNUAL DUES
Members will pay annual dues.

Dues are determined by the Town of San Anselmo’s annual Fee Schedule. *San Anselmo nonprofit organizations are eligible for a waiver of the annual dues.

If a member joins the Garden during the gardening year, the dues will be the full annual amount if there are 7 or more months remaining. Or 50% of the annual dues if there are 6 or fewer months remaining.

Dues are non-refundable.

The Town of San Anselmo (Town) will collect the annual dues, which will be placed in an account for the Garden. The Town will maintain a checking account for the Garden. The Steering Committee may request disbursements from the account.

PLOT ASSIGNMENT
The Steering Committee and the Parks and Recreation Department will be responsible for creating, assigning, and configuring garden plots. Renewing gardeners will continue in the plot they gardened the previous year.

Available plots will be assigned to new gardeners from the Waiting List.

REQUIREMENTS FOR GARDENERS TO REMAIN IN GOOD STANDING
Gardeners shall follow the Garden Rules established by the San Anselmo Town Council or the Parks and Recreations cCommission.

COMMUNITY SERVICE
In addition to plot and pathway maintenance, all gardeners are expected to volunteer in the garden. This includes annual garden cleanup days, teaching classes, or any activity deemed appropriate by the Parks and Recreation Department and/or the Steering Committee. Alternate tasks will be assigned to those unable to participate in organized activities.

In addition, it is a goal of the Garden to grow, harvest and contribute food to designated community organizations. Garden volunteers will donate them to designated community organizations. Vegetables should not be left unpicked in garden plots. Each gardener should 57 designate an alternate gardener to pick and donate vegetables from his/her plot rather than let them spoil.

If the community demand for a garden plot is low (waiting list below 10) a Community Plot can be set aside, and its produce will be contributed to designated organizations within the county.

The Community Plot may be used for Parks and Recreation Department programming.

Approved by Town Council: 10.11.22
58 San Anselmo Community Garden Bylaws

MISSION STATEMENT
The San Anselmo Community Garden at Robson-Harrington Park (SACG or Garden) will endeavor to create a sharing and learning environment in a productive, wellmaintained community garden where its members are committed to organic gardening practices, stewardship of soil and water, and in cooperation with others for the enjoyment of all.

GARDEN GOVERNANCE
The San Anselmo Parks and Recreation Department will have oversight of the Garden.

A Steering Committee appointed by the Parks and Recreation Commission will help develop policies and coordinate garden activities. The Steering Committee shall consist of 3 or more gardeners and at least one staff member of the Parks and Recreation Department as a nonvoting member. Steering Committee members will serve for a minimum term of 2 years. The Steering Committee will meet quarterly, and its meetings must comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act.

Changes to these Bylaws should be recommended to the Steering Committee and/or Parks and Recreation Department. The Parks and Recreation Commission must approve all changes.

GARDEN DESCRIPTION AND MEMBERSHIP
The SACG is a recreational facility that belongs to the Town of San Anselmo and is controlled by the San Anselmo Parks and Recreation Department. The garden is located at the Robson-Harrington Park in San Anselmo, California.

The Community Garden fiscal year is November 1 - October 31.

New members of the garden must be residents of San Anselmo, and they must continue as residents to retain their garden membership. Non-resident members as of October 31, 2022, may continue their garden membership.

A member’s plot shall not be subdivided, taken, or otherwise interfered with without the gardener’s consent. The foregoing provision shall not apply to the process regarding any violation of the community garden rules.

A Waiting List for garden membership will be maintained by the Parks and Recreation Department. San Anselmo residents may add their names to the Waiting 59 List anytime during the year. All new members to the garden will come from the wait list.

Gardeners may not bring in another gardener who does not live at the same residence to comanage their plot, nor may they sublet their plot. The exception to this would be the plot coordinator facilitating a plot share for an existing gardener with either a name from the wait list or from the current roster.

ANNUAL DUES
Members will pay annual dues.

Dues are determined by the Town of San Anselmo’s annual Fee Schedule *San Anselmo nonprofit organizations are eligible for a waiver of the annual dues.

If a member joins the Garden during the gardening year, the dues will be the full annual amount if there are 7 or more months remaining. Or 50% of the annual dues if there are 6 or fewer months remaining.

Dues are non-refundable.

The Town of San Anselmo (Town) will collect the annual dues, which will be placed in an account for the Garden. The Town will maintain a checking account for the Garden. The Steering Committee may request disbursements from the account.

PLOT ASSIGNMENT
The Steering Committee and the Parks and Recreation Department will be responsible for creating, assigning, and configuring garden plots. Renewing gardeners will continue in the plot they gardened the previous year.

Available plots will be assigned to new gardeners from the Waiting List.

REQUIREMENTS FOR GARDENERS TO REMAIN IN GOOD STANDING
Gardeners shall follow the Garden Rules established by the San Anselmo Town Council or the Parks and Recreation Commission.

COMMUNITY SERVICE
In addition to plot and pathway maintenance, all gardeners are expected to volunteer in the garden. This includes annual garden cleanup days, teaching classes, or any activity deemed appropriate by the Parks and Recreation Department and/or the Steering Committee. Alternate tasks will be assigned to those unable to participate in organized activities.
60 In addition, it is a goal of the Garden to grow, harvest and contribute food to designated community organizations. Garden volunteers will donate them to designated community organizations. Vegetables should not be left unpicked in garden plots. Each gardener should
designate an alternate gardener to pick and donate vegetables from his/her plot rather than let them spoil.

If the community demand for a garden plot is low (waiting list below 10) a Community Plot can be set aside, and its produce will be contributed to designated organizations within the county. The Community Plot may be used for Parks and Recreation Department programming.

Approved by Town Council:
61 Item #: 1.4

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item #:1.4
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Report of Checks Issued, July 2026
FROM: Jeff Zuba, Finance & Admin Services Director
RECOMMENDATION: That the Town Council acknowledges, and files warrant numbers 102064 to 102325 issued during the month of July and bank draft numbers DFT07026, DFT07057, DFT07090-DFT07091, DFT07093, DFT07095, DFT07106, DFT07108-DFT07111, DFT07123-DFT07124, DFT07144, DFT07165-DFT07172, DFT07176, and DFT07179, in a total amount of $5,512,039.04.

BACKGROUND
This report is an itemization of payments made to vendors during the months of July 2026. It also includes wires to Bank of America for July 2026 payrolls, including payments for retirement and health benefits. The Bank of America account is used for payroll-related items.

The following warrants were voided or canceled in July 2026: 82963, 83333, 85468, 87752, 94935, 95293, 102093, 102094, 102095, 102256, 102278, and 102289.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment #1: Check Report July 2026
62 8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 1 of 44
Check Report
Town of San Anselmo By Check Number
Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Bank Code: AP-AP - OPERATING POOL
01850 Hardiman Construction 07/21/2026 82963 Regular 0.00 -300.00 01280 Kripa N. Davis 07/14/2026 83333 Regular 0.00 -677.95 02083 Lily McLean 07/23/2026 85468 Regular 0.00 -300.00 01982 Stasia Leilani Winslow 07/14/2026 87752 Regular 0.00 -765.00 03331 Essence Goldman 07/21/2026 94935 Regular 0.00 -550.00 03362 Stephanie Portillo 07/21/2026 95293 Regular 0.00 -60.00 02542 Avril Angevine 07/06/2026 102064 Regular 0.00 200.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount AT-20260714 Invoice 07/01/2026 LIBRARY - ART TALK 07/14 - MATISSE 200.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 200.00 LIBRARY - ART TALK 07/14 - MAT 04110 Bridget Burke 07/06/2026 102065 Regular 0.00 225.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount AI-2026-02 Invoice 07/01/2026 LIBRARY - AI CLASS 07/09 - ASSISTIVE AI V 225.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 225.00 LIBRARY - AI CLASS 07/09 - ASSI 04110 Bridget Burke 07/06/2026 102066 Regular 0.00 225.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount AI-2026-01 Invoice 07/01/2026 LIBRARY - AI CLASS 07/09 - ASSISTIVE AI H 225.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 225.00 LIBRARY - AI CLASS 07/09 - ASSI 01345 BSN Sports Inc 07/06/2026 102067 Regular 0.00 1,608.38 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 312694106 Invoice 07/01/2026 SOCCER SUPPLIES 1,608.38 0.00

21.61.62964 SOCCER SUPPLIES 1,608.38 SOCCER SUPPLIES
04241 Ina Buckner-Barnette 07/06/2026 102068 Regular 0.00 500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 06082026 Invoice 07/01/2026 SUNSHINE STORYTELLER FAMILY PERFOR 500.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 500.00 SUNSHINE STORYTELLER FAMILY 04240 James Henry 07/06/2026 102069 Regular 0.00 550.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 335746 Invoice 07/01/2026 HOUSE OF SAMBA FAMILY PERFORMANC 550.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 550.00 HOUSE OF SAMBA FAMILY PERF 00330 Marin General Services Authority 07/06/2026 102070 Regular 0.00 108,600.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount MGSA-MC-2026- Invoice 07/01/2026 FY2026-2027 MEMBER CONTRIBUTION 108,600.00 0.00

01.21.61115 OUTSIDE SVCS:CLIM&ERG 6,224.00 MARIN CLIMATE AND ENERGY P

01.21.61116 OUTSIDE SVCS-ANIMAL C 85,616.00 ANIMAL SERVICES - FIRST HALF

01.41.61111 OUTSIDE SERVICES-GIS M 9,000.00 MARINMAP

01.42.61129 OUTSIDE SVCS-MC GEN S 1,313.00 MGSA GENERAL

01.42.61129 OUTSIDE SVCS-MC GEN S 906.00 STREETLIGHTS

01.42.61129 OUTSIDE SVCS-MC GEN S 5,541.00 MEDIATION
00644 MARINet 07/06/2026 102071 Regular 0.00 112,886.42 63 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 2 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount OB-FY20262027 Invoice 07/01/2026 ANNUAL DUES FY2026-2027 112,886.42 0.00

01.71.61197 AUTOMATED CALTALOG A 89,107.46 OPERATING BUDGET FY2026-20

27.71.61197 AUTOMATED CALTALOG A 6,389.23 LINK +

27.71.61197 AUTOMATED CALTALOG A 8,491.43 DELIVERY

27.71.61706 CENIC NETWORK SERVICE 8,898.30 CENIC 1GE NETWORK 04239 Matthew Purdon 07/06/2026 102072 Regular 0.00 425.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1005 Invoice 07/01/2026 PUPPET SHOW - JULY 22 425.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 425.00 PUPPET SHOW - JULY 22 02689 Perry Yan 07/06/2026 102073 Regular 0.00 450.00
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 445 Invoice 07/01/2026 PERRY YAN MAGIC FAMILY PERFORMANC 450.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 450.00 PERRY YAN MAGIC FAMILY PERF 00839 Rachel-Anne Palacios 07/06/2026 102074 Regular 0.00 400.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 030 Invoice 07/01/2026 HENNA PROGRAM - JULY 28 400.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 400.00 HENNA PROGRAM - JULY 28 04242 Samantha Ashe 07/06/2026 102075 Regular 0.00 450.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 20260803-02 Invoice 07/01/2026 BUBBLE SHOW - AUG 3 450.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 450.00 BUBBLE SHOW - AUG 3 04011 Tyler Parks 07/06/2026 102076 Regular 0.00 525.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1588 Invoice 07/01/2026 CIRCUS OF SMILES FAMILY PERFORMANC 525.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 525.00 CIRCUS OF SMILES FAMILY PERF 02411 23 ELEPHANTS THEATRE COMPANY 07/09/2026 102077 Regular 0.00 6,426.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount SUMMER2026-W Invoice 07/07/2026 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 4 - MOANA CAMP 6,426.00 0.00

21.63.61186 SPECIALTY CAMPS SERVIC 6,426.00 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 4 - MOA 02920 Amazon Business 07/09/2026 102078 Regular 0.00 762.74 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 11J9-7X1P-HM96 Invoice 07/07/2026 REC - LIN - OLDER ADULT PROGRAMMING 6.60 0.00

21.64 OLDER ADUILT PROGRAM 6.60 REC - LIN - OLDER ADULT PROGR 1GWC-TMRH-HN Invoice 07/07/2026 LIB - KENTON - DEPT SUPPLIES 41.45 0.00

01.71.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 41.45 LIB - KENTON - DEPT SUPPLIES 1K77-K1PN-1Q1C Invoice 07/06/2026 REC - HILLARD - DEPT SUPPLIES 130.00 0.00

21.65.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 130.00 REC - HILLARD - DEPT SUPPLIES 1YH7-YKWW-LYX Invoice 07/07/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMPKIDMARIN MIGHTY 478.69 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 478.69 REC - HILLARD - CAMPKIDMARI 1YPN-FMHF-RDT Invoice 07/06/2026 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 106.00 0.00

01.71.62301 ADULT BOOKS 106.00 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 00276 BK Krill Corp 07/09/2026 102079 Regular 0.00 2,300.00 64 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 3 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1753 Invoice 07/01/2026 RECREATION GUIDE - FALL 2026 2,300.00 0.00

21.65.62004 PROGRAM BROCHURE & 2,300.00 RECREATION GUIDE - FALL 2026 02606 Halleh Besharati 07/09/2026 102080 Regular 0.00 3,307.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount SUMMER2026-W Invoice 07/06/2026 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 4 - CLAY AND PLAY 3,307.00 0.00

21.63.61186 SPECIALTY CAMPS SERVIC 3,307.00 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 4 - CLAY 00020 Hannibal's Inc Electrical Construction 07/09/2026 102081 Regular 0.00 508.80 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 25523 Invoice 07/06/2026 LIBRARY - SHORTED OUTLET REPAIR 508.80 0.00

41.41.63117 CONSTRUCTION - BUILDI 508.80 LIBRARY - SHORTED OUTLET REP 03913 Independent Distribution Collective LLC 07/09/2026 102082 Regular 0.00 4,700.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount LOTA-SM-2026-0 Invoice 07/01/2026 LOTA SHOW MGMT/PRODUCTION ASST - 3,200.00 0.00

60.14.62903 LIVE ON THE AVENUE 3,200.00 LOTA SHOW MGMT/PRODUCTI LOTA-TP-2026-07 Invoice 07/01/2026 IDC TECHNICAL PRODUCTION - JUL 2026 1,500.00 0.00

60.14.62903 LIVE ON THE AVENUE 1,500.00 IDC TECHNICAL PRODUCTION - J 02042 Marin I J 30640450 Circulation Library 07/09/2026 102083 Regular 0.00 1,759.67 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 4674389-2027 Invoice 07/01/2026 ACCT# 4674389 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 1,759.67 0.00

01.71.62305 MAGAZINES AND NEWSP 1,759.67 ACCT# 4674389 SUBSCRIPTION 00332 MERA 07/09/2026 102084 Regular 0.00 18,451.00
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2026-20 Invoice 07/01/2026 FY26-27 OPERATING BUDGET - MEMBER 18,451.00 0.00

01.21.61113 OUTSIDE SRVS-MERA AD 18,451.00 FY26-27 OPERATING BUDGET - 00397 NorthNetLibrary System 07/09/2026 102085 Regular 0.00 92.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2438 Invoice 07/01/2026 FY2026-2027 NBCLS MEMBERSHIP UAL 92.00 0.00

01.71.61302 DUES 92.00 FY2026-2027 NBCLS MEMBERS
00165 Pacific Telemanagement Services - PTS 07/09/2026 102086 Regular 0.00 93.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2155238 Invoice 07/01/2026 TOWN HALL PAYPHONE - JUL 2026 93.00 0.00

01.42.61705 UTILITIES-TELEPHONE 93.00 TOWN HALL PAYPHONE - JUL 20 02474 T2 SYSTEMS CANADA INC. 07/09/2026 102087 Regular 0.00 238.16 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 7003161 Invoice 07/01/2026 DIGITAL IRIS SERVICE - JUL 2026 238.16 0.00

13.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 238.16 DIGITAL IRIS SERVICE - JUL 2026 00384 Van Midde & Son Concrete 07/09/2026 102088 Regular 0.00 5,250.00 65 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 4 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 16127 Invoice 07/02/2026 SA PARKING LOT - PRE-FAB ADA GRATE IN 5,250.00 0.00

15.41.63109 UNPROGRAMMED DRAIN 5,250.00 SA PARKING LOT - PRE-FAB ADA 02411 23 ELEPHANTS THEATRE COMPANY 07/09/2026 102089 Regular 0.00 7,392.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount SUMMER2026-W Invoice 06/30/2026 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 3 - KPOP CALLING 7,392.00 0.00

21.63.61186 SPECIALTY CAMPS SERVIC 7,392.00 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 3 - KPOP 03932 Acevedo and Longfellow LLP 07/09/2026 102090 Regular 0.00 47,811.20 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 103 Invoice 05/01/2026 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES - APR 2026 10,241.00 0.00

01.16.61138 GENERAL COUNSEL LEGA 10,241.00 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES - APR 104 Invoice 05/01/2026 PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES - MAY 2026 440.00 0.00

01.16.61138 GENERAL COUNSEL LEGA 440.00 PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES - M 111 Invoice 06/01/2026 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES - JUN 2026 10,114.50 0.00

01.16.61138 GENERAL COUNSEL LEGA 10,114.50 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES - JUN 112 Invoice 06/01/2026 PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES - MAY 2026 852.20 0.00

01.16.61138 GENERAL COUNSEL LEGA 852.20 PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES - M 118 Invoice 06/30/2026 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES - JUN 2026 21,103.50 0.00

01.16.61138 GENERAL COUNSEL LEGA 21,103.50 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES - JUN 119 Invoice 06/30/2026 PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES - JUN 2026 5,060.00 0.00

01.16.61138 GENERAL COUNSEL LEGA 5,060.00 PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES - JU 04247 Adam Noelting 07/09/2026 102091 Regular 0.00 1,338.30 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-PF-PRO2025- Invoice 06/25/2026 REFUND - PLANNING FEES - 109 JORDAN 1,338.30 0.00

01.00.48012 GENERAL PLAN MAINT FE 116.37 REFUND - PLANNING FEES - 109

01.00.48057 PLANNING FEES 1,163.74 REFUND - PLANNING FEES - 109

01.00.48059 PLANNING TRAINING FEE 58.19 REFUND - PLANNING FEES - 109 02920 Amazon Business 07/09/2026 102092 Regular 0.00 5,927.19 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1139-RKVC-N9L4 Invoice 12/16/2025 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 12.42 0.00

21.63.62979 PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 12.42 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIE 11TK-L3RY-DDXJ Invoice 11/06/2025 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLIES 241.14 0.00

21.63.61187 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 241.14 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLI 136P-3M74-GWR Invoice 02/04/2026 ADMIN - CLIFFORD - OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.40 0.00

01.12.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.40 ADMIN - CLIFFORD - OFFICE SUP 13FK-JMLP-NWPY Invoice 02/02/2026 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 484.74 0.00

21.63.62979 PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 484.74 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIE 141M-LY79-GFJQ Invoice 02/04/2026 ADMIN - CLIFFORD - OFFICE SUPPLIES 12.46 0.00

01.12.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12.46 ADMIN - CLIFFORD - OFFICE SUP 161R-7CD1-H4FG Invoice 02/03/2026 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 278.80 0.00

21.63.62979 PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 278.80 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIE 167V-X3DW-F6JN Invoice 06/23/2026 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLIES 20.37 0.00

21.63.61187 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 20.37 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLI 16MD-N4TD-MYP Invoice 12/17/2025 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 19.38 0.00

21.63.62979 PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 19.38 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIE 16NV-V3H6-T7TN Invoice 06/30/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMPKIDMARIN MIGHTY 465.73 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 465.73 REC - HILLARD - CAMPKIDMARI 66 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 5 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number 19WN-YYPR-FDJJ Invoice 02/04/2026 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 90.48 0.00

21.63.62979 PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 90.48 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIE 1CGT-16KL-DCJR Invoice 11/06/2025 REC - LIN - OLDER ADULT PROGRAMMING 296.15 0.00

21.64 OLDER ADUILT PROGRAM 296.15 REC - LIN - OLDER ADULT PROGR 1CQH-73MQ-T96 Invoice 06/30/2026 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLIES 94.36 0.00

21.63.61187 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 94.36 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLI 1D7C-QWK3-RKF Invoice 06/22/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMPKIDMARIN MIGHTY 67.07 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 67.07 REC - HILLARD - CAMPKIDMARI 1DTJ-16NM-4TT3 Invoice 06/28/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 391.33 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 391.33 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 1F3Q-P3LK-W4P Invoice 06/16/2026 REC - FEE - OFFICE SUPPLIES 104.31 0.00

21.65.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 104.31 REC - FEE - OFFICE SUPPLIES 1F4V-1P37-J3KR Invoice 02/03/2026 LIB - ZIPBOOKS - ALAMANO 22.52 0.00

01.71.62310 Library Zip Grant 22.52 LIB - ZIPBOOKS - ALAMANO 1FFY-1LFC-GMVL Invoice 02/03/2026 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 45.70 0.00

21.63.62979 PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 45.70 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIE 1FR3-TGJY-PLXH Invoice 06/29/2026 LIB - ZIPBOOKS - ALAMANO 15.28 0.00

01.71.62310 Library Zip Grant 15.28 LIB - ZIPBOOKS - ALAMANO 1FXR-4GTN-1M7 Invoice 12/17/2025 LIB - ZIPBOOKS - ALAMANO 17.68 0.00

01.71.62310 Library Zip Grant 17.68 LIB - ZIPBOOKS - ALAMANO 1GJ1-JXH1-J6W9 Invoice 12/03/2025 REC - LIN - DEPT SUPPLIES 35.87 0.00

21.65.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 35.87 REC - LIN - DEPT SUPPLIES 1GQ3-FWX4-MC6 Invoice 06/29/2026 REC - HILLARD - TODDLER ENRICHMENT 417.91 0.00

21.63.62978 TODDLER ENRICHMENT S 417.91 REC - HILLARD - TODDLER ENRIC 1GYL-MDVL-3FM Invoice 02/23/2026 REC - LIN - OLDER ADULT PROGRAMMING 61.68 0.00

21.64 OLDER ADUILT PROGRAM 61.68 REC - LIN - OLDER ADULT PROGR 1H3R-MMVT-RFF Invoice 06/27/2026 REC - JONES - CAMPKIDMARIN MINI 281.52 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 281.52 REC - JONES - CAMPKIDMARIN 1JFW-C6MD-FRG Invoice 06/25/2026 LIB - KENTON - VIDEOS 33.31 0.00

01.71.62307 VIDEOS 33.31 LIB - KENTON - VIDEOS
1JJH-RTHD-R631 Invoice 06/30/2026 REC - LIN - OLDER ADULT PROGRAMMING 16.49 0.00

21.64 OLDER ADUILT PROGRAM 16.49 REC - LIN - OLDER ADULT PROGR 1JP9-46XK-FRJY Invoice 09/30/2025 REC - HILLARD - TODDLER ENRICHMENT 360.81 0.00

21.63.62978 TODDLER ENRICHMENT S 360.81 REC - HILLARD - TODDLER ENRIC 1LGG-9DYJ-QN33 Invoice 06/27/2026 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLIES 37.28 0.00

21.63.61187 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 37.28 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLI 1LJQ-PDHW-3LV6 Invoice 06/30/2026 LIB - KENTON - DEPT SUPPLIES 415.14 0.00

01.71.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 415.14 LIB - KENTON - DEPT SUPPLIES 1NT9-1F4F-FG1P Invoice 06/23/2026 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 26.17 0.00

01.71.62301 ADULT BOOKS 26.17 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 1NWD-7NJP-469 Invoice 12/30/2025 LIBRARY - KENTON - CHILDREN'S BOOKS 7.80 0.00

01.71.62302 CHILDRENS BOOKS 7.80 LIBRARY - KENTON - CHILDREN'S 1NY4-CG3G-GCG Invoice 06/24/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMPKIDMARIN MIGHTY 493.81 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 493.81 REC - HILLARD - CAMPKIDMARI 1P7J-CDXM-HT1P Invoice 06/15/2026 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLIES 36.68 0.00

21.63.61187 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 36.68 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLI 1PLX-6616-QXYJ Invoice 05/04/2026 LIB - KENTON - DEPT SUPPLIES 61.12 0.00

01.71.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 61.12 LIB - KENTON - DEPT SUPPLIES 1PMN-7TR1-1TK1 Invoice 08/03/2025 REC - HILLARD - CAMPKIDMARIN MIGHTY 365.33 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 365.33 REC - HILLARD - ROBSON SUPPLI 1PWT-VYH6-LFMJ Invoice 02/02/2026 REC - HILLARD - TODDLER ENRICHMENT 22.60 0.00

21.63.62978 TODDLER ENRICHMENT S 22.60 REC - HILLARD - TODDLER ENRIC 67 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 6 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number 1Q6R-Q4HC-K91 Invoice 06/28/2026 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 115.40 0.00

01.71.62301 ADULT BOOKS 115.40 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 1QCH-1JTL-KD4C Invoice 12/17/2025 REC - FEE - OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.97 0.00

21.65.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.97 REC - FEE - OFFICE SUPPLIES 1QDW-6LCK-NKX Invoice 12/15/2025 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 24.86 0.00

21.63.62979 PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 24.86 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIE 1QH3-HPFP-NJM Invoice 12/18/2025 REC - LIN - OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.89 0.00

21.65.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.89 REC - LIN - OFFICE SUPPLIES 1QQ3-XPCH-D6D Invoice 05/28/2026 LIB - KENTON - DEPT SUPPLIES 41.50 0.00

01.71.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 41.50 LIB - KENTON - DEPT SUPPLIES 1QRM-MFQF-NM Invoice 04/08/2026 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 27.17 0.00

01.71.62301 ADULT BOOKS 27.17 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 1RLD-GVHD-KK6F Invoice 11/24/2025 REC - LIN - SPECIALTY CAMP SUPPLIES 56.69 0.00

21.63.62990 SPECIALTY CAMP SUPPLIE 56.69 REC - LIN - SPECIALTY CAMP SUP 1T4C-YJY9-LJ3L Invoice 12/16/2025 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 18.39 0.00

21.63.62979 PARKSIDE SUPPLIES 18.39 REC - JONES - PARKSIDE SUPPLIE 1TLW-3TCJ-HVV1 Invoice 06/23/2026 REC - FEE - OFFICE SUPPLIES 27.47 0.00

21.65.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 27.47 REC - FEE - OFFICE SUPPLIES 1VKL-6XFH-GJVH Invoice 05/01/2026 LIB - KENTON - DEPT SUPPLIES 142.00 0.00

01.71.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 142.00 LIB - KENTON - DEPT SUPPLIES 1WDG-KNWF-39 Invoice 02/23/2026 REC - LIN - DEPT SUPPLIES 8.10 0.00

21.65.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 8.10 REC - LIN - DEPT SUPPLIES 1WRW-WXM1-C Invoice 10/02/2025 REC - HILLARD - TODDLER ENRICHMENT 10.91 0.00

21.63.62978 TODDLER ENRICHMENT S 10.91 REC - HILLARD - TODDLER ENRIC 1YQH-9PXQ-LRG Invoice 03/11/2026 REC - FEE - OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.00 0.00

21.65.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.00 REC - FEE - OFFICE SUPPLIES **Void** 07/09/2026 102093 Regular 0.00 0.00
**Void** 07/09/2026 102094 Regular 0.00 0.00
**Void** 07/09/2026 102095 Regular 0.00 0.00
01752 Anderson Vought Consulting Inc. 07/09/2026 102096 Regular 0.00 600.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1502-REISSUE Invoice 05/28/2026 REISSUE CK101850 - FAUDE PK INSP/CON 600.00 0.00

01.81.61105 OUTSIDE SERVICES-TREES 600.00 REISSUE CK101850 - FAUDE PK I 03299 Answer MTI 07/09/2026 102097 Regular 0.00 211.84
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 000040-905-011 Invoice 06/30/2026 CALL CENTER SERVICE - JUN 2026 211.84 0.00

01.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 211.84 CALL CENTER SERVICE - JUN 202 00001 AT&T Calnet 07/09/2026 102098 Regular 0.00 64.28
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 000025445817 Invoice 06/27/2026 576 - TH CHAMBERS - 05.27.2026-06.26.2 64.28 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 64.28 576 - TH CHAMBERS - 05.27.202 03394 Bibliotheca, LLC 07/09/2026 102099 Regular 0.00 2,703.74 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV-US86664 Invoice 06/30/2026 FY25-26 STAFFCONNECT LICENSE/RFID W 2,703.74 0.00

01.71.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 2,703.74 FY25-26 STAFFCONNECT LICENS 03946 BlueTriton Brands Inc 07/09/2026 102100 Regular 0.00 192.63 68 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 7 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 06F8720212838 Invoice 06/24/2026 WATER DELIVERY - REC - JUN 2026 192.63 0.00

21.65.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 192.63 WATER DELIVERY - REC - JUN 20 064 California Building Standards Commission 07/09/2026 102101 Regular 0.00 288.29 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount BSASRF-2025-Q4 Invoice 06/30/2026 FY2025 Q4 - BLDG STDS ADMIN SPECIAL R 288.29 0.00

01.00.20310 BUILDING: STATE GREEN 320.32 FY2025 Q4 - BLDG STDS ADMIN

01.00.20310 BUILDING: STATE GREEN -32.03 LESS 10% GOV'T RETAINER 04253 Chris Gottschalk 07/09/2026 102102 Regular 0.00 50,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-UG-B2023-0 Invoice 06/30/2026 REFUND - UNDERGROUNDING - 9 PROSPE 50,000.00 0.00

01.00.20377 Undergrounding Deposit 50,000.00 REFUND - UNDERGROUNDING - 02601 Crabar/GBF Inc 07/09/2026 102103 Regular 0.00 321.82 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 52274124 Invoice 04/13/2026 PARKING MACHINE - 60MM ROLLS 321.82 0.00

13.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 321.82 PARKING MACHINE - 60MM ROL 04103 CWS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC 07/09/2026 102104 Regular 0.00 38,175.46 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 06302026-7 Invoice 06/30/2026 LIBRARY ROOF/HVAC/INTERIOR - RETENTI 38,175.46 0.00

41.41.63117 CONSTRUCTION - BUILDI 38,175.46 LIBRARY ROOF/HVAC/INTERIOR 00533 Davis Sign Company 07/09/2026 102105 Regular 0.00 6,315.49 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 41739 Invoice 06/22/2026 LOTA/RESILIENCE HUB SIGNAGE 6,315.49 0.00

15.90.63100 CONSTRUCTION 177.95 LOTA/RESILIENCE HUB SIGNAGE

60.14.62903 LIVE ON THE AVENUE 6,137.54 LOTA/RESILIENCE HUB SIGNAGE 00035 Demco Inc 07/09/2026 102106 Regular 0.00 375.53
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 7824362 Invoice 06/30/2026 LIB - DEPT SUPPLIES - LABELS/STEP STOOL 375.53 0.00

01.71.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 375.53 LIB - DEPT SUPPLIES - LABELS/ST 01689 Department of Conservation 07/09/2026 102107 Regular 0.00 555.63 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount CSMIP-2026-Q2 Invoice 06/30/2026 CY2026 Q2 - STRONG MOTION/INSTRMN 555.63 0.00

01.00.20302 BUILDING: STATE SEISMIC 584.87 CY2026 Q2 - STRONG MOTION/I

01.00.20302 BUILDING: STATE SEISMIC -29.24 LESS 5% GOV'T RETAINER 00086 Ebsco Subscription Services 07/09/2026 102108 Regular 0.00 2,964.49 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 91011051754 Invoice 06/27/2026 LIBRARY - ANNUAL MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPT 2,964.49 0.00

01.71.62305 MAGAZINES AND NEWSP 2,964.49 LIBRARY - ANNUAL MAGAZINE S 02777 Elizabeth Flanagan 07/09/2026 102109 Regular 0.00 47.60 69 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 8 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount PAINTING-JUN20 Invoice 06/30/2026 PAINTING WORKSHOPS - JUN 2026 47.60 0.00

21.62.61171 ADULT CULTURE SERVICE 47.60 PAINTING WORKSHOPS - JUN 20 03396 Emily B. Stucky 07/09/2026 102110 Regular 0.00 450.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 0626 Invoice 06/30/2026 SING AND STOMP - JUN 2026 450.00 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 450.00 SING AND STOMP - JUN 2026 00267 Emma J. Beauchamp 07/09/2026 102111 Regular 0.00 2,246.40 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount RVAC-SUMMER2 Invoice 06/30/2026 SUMMER 2026 - ROSS VALLEY ART CAMP 2,246.40 0.00

21.63.61182 ART AND MUSIC CAMP C 2,246.40 SUMMER 2026 - ROSS VALLEY A 00408 Greg Martinez 07/09/2026 102112 Regular 0.00 409.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 38449731-ADJ Invoice 06/30/2026 CAMP KIDMARIN - WATER SLIDE - BALAN 10.00 0.00

21.63.61207 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI SE 10.00 CAMP KIDMARIN - WATER SLIDE 56660717 Invoice 04/29/2026 CAMP KIDMARIN - PIRATE SHIP ACITIVITY 399.00 0.00

21.63.61207 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI SE 399.00 CAMP KIDMARIN - PIRATE SHIP 02606 Halleh Besharati 07/09/2026 102113 Regular 0.00 3,930.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount SUMMER2026-W Invoice 06/30/2026 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 3 - SPRINKLE BAKI 3,930.00 0.00

21.63.61186 SPECIALTY CAMPS SERVIC 3,930.00 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 3 - SPRI 02236 HooplaDigital 07/09/2026 102114 Regular 0.00 797.23 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 509081472 Invoice 06/30/2026 LIBRARY - DIGITAL ACCOUNT - JUN 2026 797.23 0.00

27.71.62301 ADULT BOOKS 797.23 LIBRARY - DIGITAL ACCOUNT - J 03837 Ivy Tzur 07/09/2026 102115 Regular 0.00 14,375.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 22 Invoice 06/30/2026 PROJECT MGMT - JUN 2026 14,375.00 0.00

01.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 8,625.00 PROJECT MGMT - JUN 2026

15.32.63100 CONSTRUCTION 2,156.25 PROJECT MGMT - JUN 2026

17.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 2,156.25 PROJECT MGMT - JUN 2026

41.41.63117 CONSTRUCTION - BUILDI 1,437.50 PROJECT MGMT - JUN 2026 00880 Jasmine June Gavam 07/09/2026 102116 Regular 0.00 1,900.80 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount RVAC-SUMMER2 Invoice 06/30/2026 ROSS VALLEY ART CAMP - SUMMER 2026 1,900.80 0.00

21.63.61182 ART AND MUSIC CAMP C 1,900.80 ROSS VALLEY ART CAMP - SUM 02558 Kanopy 07/09/2026 102117 Regular 0.00 426.00
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 512162 Invoice 06/30/2026 LIBRARY - VIDEOS - JUN 2026 426.00 0.00

01.71.62307 VIDEOS 426.00 LIBRARY - VIDEOS - JUN 2026
04250 Kevin Li 07/09/2026 102118 Regular 0.00 3,696.00
70 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 9 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-PF-PRO2026- Invoice 06/25/2026 REFUND - PLANNING FEES - 810 SFD BLVD 3,696.00 0.00

01.00.48057 PLANNING FEES 196.00 REFUND - PLANNING FEES - 810

01.00.48057 PLANNING FEES 3,500.00 REFUND - PLANNING FEES - 810 04245 Larkspur NFL FLAG LLC 07/09/2026 102119 Regular 0.00 5,880.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount FFC-2026-WK1-R Invoice 06/22/2026 REISSUE - NFL FLAG FOOTBALL CAMP - 20 5,880.00 0.00

21.63.61183 CAMP SPORTS SERVICES 5,880.00 REISSUE - NFL FLAG FOOTBALL C 00377 Luis Quezada 07/09/2026 102120 Regular 0.00 7,217.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount USASC-JUN2026- Invoice 06/30/2026 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER 2026 - 06/ 4,368.00 0.00

21.63.61183 CAMP SPORTS SERVICES 4,368.00 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER USASC-JUN2026- Invoice 06/30/2026 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER 2026 - 06/ 2,849.00 0.00

21.63.61183 CAMP SPORTS SERVICES 2,849.00 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER 00149 Marin County Sheriff's Department 07/09/2026 102121 Regular 0.00 30.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 13321 Invoice 05/21/2026 FY2025-2026 Q3 LIVE SCAN SVCS - JAN-M 30.00 0.00

21.65.61137 FINGERPRINTING 30.00 FY2025-2026 Q3 LIVE SCAN SVC 00029 Marin IT 07/09/2026 102122 Regular 0.00 9,276.18
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2026-132017 Invoice 06/30/2026 MANAGED OFFICE 365 - JUN 2026 1,861.01 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 1,861.01 MANAGED OFFICE 365 - JUN 20 2026-132019 Invoice 06/30/2026 AUTOMATE & DEFENDER - JUN 2026 2,388.50 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 2,388.50 AUTOMATE & DEFENDER - JUN 2026-132020 Invoice 06/30/2026 IT MGMT SUPPORT - JUN 2026 5,026.67 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 5,026.67 IT MGMT SUPPORT - JUN 2026 03953 Michelle Misino de Luca 07/09/2026 102123 Regular 0.00 300.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount CKM-JUL2026 Invoice 06/30/2026 CAMP KIDMARIN - BUKI COMEDY SHOWS 300.00 0.00

21.63.61184 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 150.00 CAMP KIDMARIN - BUKI COMED

21.63.61207 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI SE 150.00 CAMP KIDMARIN - BUKI COMED 00609 Midwest Tape 07/09/2026 102124 Regular 0.00 229.01 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 509032037 Invoice 06/22/2026 LIBRARY - BLURAY/DVDS - JUN 2026 76.32 0.00

01.71.62307 VIDEOS 76.32 LIBRARY - BLURAY/DVDS - JUN 2
509069520 Invoice 06/29/2026 LIBRARY - DVDS - VARIOUS 152.69 0.00

01.71.62307 VIDEOS 152.69 LIBRARY - DVDS - VARIOUS
01388 National Center for Safety Initiatives 07/09/2026 102125 Regular 0.00 18.50 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 70931 Invoice 06/30/2026 BACKGROUND CHECKS - REC - JUN 2026 18.50 0.00

21.65.61137 FINGERPRINTING 18.50 BACKGROUND CHECKS - REC - J 00403 Nicole Diosdado 07/09/2026 102126 Regular 0.00 1,900.80 71 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 10 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount RVAC-SUMMER2 Invoice 06/30/2026 SUMMER 2026 - ROSS VALLEY ART CAMP 1,900.80 0.00

21.63.61182 ART AND MUSIC CAMP C 1,900.80 SUMMER 2026 - ROSS VALLEY A 03211 ODP Business Solutions LLC 07/09/2026 102127 Regular 0.00 87.38 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 473489863001 Invoice 06/15/2026 OFFICE SUPPLIES - PLANNING - COMPUTE 87.38 0.00

01.19.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 87.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES - PLANNING - 00992 OverDrive Inc. 07/09/2026 102128 Regular 0.00 3,001.19 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 02883CO262148 Invoice 06/29/2026 LIBRARY - EBOOKS/AUDIOBOOKS - JUN 20 3,001.19 0.00

01.71.62301 ADULT BOOKS 3,001.19 LIBRARY - EBOOKS/AUDIOBOOK 01139 Phillips Seabrook Associates 07/09/2026 102129 Regular 0.00 1,800.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 260254 Invoice 06/30/2026 BUILDING OFFICIAL - JUN/JUL 2026 1,800.00 0.00

01.19.61157 PLAN CHECKING 1,800.00 BUILDING OFFICIAL - JUN/JUL 2 04251 Redwood Credit Union 07/09/2026 102130 Regular 0.00 1,442.18 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-PF-PRO2026- Invoice 06/25/2026 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 894 SFD BLVD 1,442.18 0.00

01.00.20354 DUE TO ROSS VALLEY FIR 328.00 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 894 SF

01.00.48012 GENERAL PLAN MAINT FE 77.81 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 894 SF

01.00.48057 PLANNING FEES 778.12 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 894 SF

01.00.48057 PLANNING FEES 196.00 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 894 SF

01.00.48058 PLANNING TECHNOLOGY 23.34 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 894 SF

01.00.48059 PLANNING TRAINING FEE 38.91 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 894 SF 03533 Sterling Johnson 07/09/2026 102131 Regular 0.00 400.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount CKM-JUL2026 Invoice 06/30/2026 CAMP KIDMARIN BACKWARDS FIELD TRIP 400.00 0.00

21.63.61184 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 200.00 CAMP KIDMARIN BACKWARDS F

21.63.61207 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI SE 200.00 CAMP KIDMARIN BACKWARDS F 00024 T & B Sports Inc 07/09/2026 102132 Regular 0.00 330.48 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 0000247008 Invoice 06/25/2026 2026 ADULT SOFTBALL - CHAMPION SHIR 330.48 0.00

21.61.61165 SOFTBALL SERVICES 330.48 2026 ADULT SOFTBALL - CHAMP 04011 Tyler Parks 07/09/2026 102133 Regular 0.00 525.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1582 Invoice 01/19/2026 CAMP KIDMARIN BACKWARDS FIELD TRIP 525.00 0.00

21.63.61184 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 262.50 CAMP KIDMARIN BACKWARDS F

21.63.61207 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI SE 262.50 CAMP KIDMARIN BACKWARDS F 04011 Tyler Parks 07/09/2026 102133 Regular 0.00 -525.00 04248 William Hendrickson 07/09/2026 102134 Regular 0.00 1,893.61 72 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 11 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-PF-PRO2025- Invoice 06/25/2026 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 109 TAMALPAIS 1,893.61 0.00

01.00.48012 GENERAL PLAN MAINT FE 164.66 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 109 TA

01.00.48057 PLANNING FEES 1,646.62 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 109 TA

01.00.48059 PLANNING TRAINING FEE 82.33 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 109 TA 02920 Amazon Business 07/16/2026 102135 Regular 0.00 1,849.18 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 13YT-P96W-MKK Invoice 07/08/2026 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN MINI 26.57 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 26.57 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN 1471-P397-LHMV Invoice 07/08/2026 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN MINI 17.47 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 17.47 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN 14LR-WMF4-RW Invoice 07/06/2026 ST&PK - SHAW - LOTA SUPPLIES 137.82 0.00

60.14.62903 LIVE ON THE AVENUE 137.82 ST&PK - SHAW - LOTA SUPPLIES 16D4-X3HV-W6F Invoice 07/11/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 451.54 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 451.54 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 16JV-RL4D-V9T3 Invoice 07/11/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 393.96 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 393.96 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 1DQM-C16G-1M Invoice 06/30/2026 LIB - KENTON - CHILDREN'S BOOKS 15.01 0.00

01.71.62302 CHILDRENS BOOKS 15.01 LIB - KENTON - CHILDREN'S BOO 1J4W-LJD3-GCDQ Invoice 07/09/2026 ADMIN - AVILA - ELECTIONS SUPPLIES 37.35 0.00

01.12.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 37.35 ADMIN - AVILA - ELECTIONS SUP 1JG4-THKV-VXD Invoice 06/30/2026 ST&PK - SHAW - OFFICE SUPPLIES PARKS 283.53 0.00

01.81.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 283.53 ST&PK - SHAW - OFFICE SUPPLIE 1RHF-CLN4-WFV Invoice 06/30/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 410.68 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 410.68 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 1WJ6-YHLF-RTPL Invoice 06/24/2026 ST&PK - HEALY - DEPT SUPPLIES BLDG 75.25 0.00

01.41.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 75.25 ST&PK - HEALY - DEPT SUPPLIES 04265 Amy Hunt 07/16/2026 102136 Regular 0.00 1,000.00
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK5368 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 125 CRESCENT R 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 125 CR 02330 Andrew & Carin Gidney Living Trust 07/16/2026 102137 Regular 0.00 4,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2018-01 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 49 BELLE AVE 4,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 4,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 49 BELL 04268 Ashley Petersen 07/16/2026 102138 Regular 0.00 10,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2018-00 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 625 SAN ANSEL 10,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 10,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 625 SA 00001 AT&T Calnet 07/16/2026 102139 Regular 0.00 422.04 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 000025422787 Invoice 06/20/2026 634 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODEM - 05.20.20 422.04 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 422.04 634 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODEM - 03921 AXL Brand LLC 07/16/2026 102140 Regular 0.00 99.40 73 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 12 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 261049-1-LOTA-Si Invoice 07/13/2026 LOTA ALUMINUM CUP A-FRAME SIGNS 99.40 0.00

90.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 99.40 LOTA ALUMINUM CUP A-FRAME 00007 Bay Cities Joint Power Insurance Authority 07/16/2026 102141 Regular 0.00 164.28 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount BCJPIA-0254-202 Invoice 06/30/2026 WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS - MAY 2026 164.28 0.00

40.21.61907 WORKERS COMPENSATIO 164.28 WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS - MAY 04259 Benjamin Stock 07/16/2026 102142 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2016-03 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 195 THE ALAME 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 195 TH 00061 Bill Jacobson 07/16/2026 102143 Regular 0.00 290.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1676 Invoice 06/30/2026 SANHUB AUDIO SERVER - APR-JUN 2026 290.00 0.00

01.12.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 290.00 SANHUB AUDIO SERVER - APR-J 03208 Brightly Software, Inc 07/16/2026 102144 Regular 0.00 8,697.35 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV-306130 Invoice 07/01/2026 ANNUAL SOFTWARE LICENSE - ASSET/P&R 8,697.35 0.00

01.42.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 8,697.35 ANNUAL SOFTWARE LICENSE - A 03864 Cal West Rentals, Inc. 07/16/2026 102145 Regular 0.00 1,215.93 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 467857 Invoice 06/26/2026 FH20 - LANDSCAPING - EXCAVATOR/BUCK 1,215.93 0.00

15.32.63100 CONSTRUCTION 1,215.93 FH20 - LANDSCAPING - EXCAVAT 02851 Casey Cowgill 07/16/2026 102146 Regular 0.00 6,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2021-04 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 26 SAN RAFAEL A 6,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 6,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 26 SAN 00660 Center for Domestic Peace 07/16/2026 102147 Regular 0.00 2,700.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2015-07 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 128 BUTTERFIEL 2,700.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,700.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 128 BU 04253 Chris Gottschalk 07/16/2026 102148 Regular 0.00 15,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2023-00 Invoice 06/30/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 9 PROSPECT AVE 15,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 15,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 9 PROS 01534 Christine O'Rourke 07/16/2026 102149 Regular 0.00 97,826.50 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1040 Invoice 06/30/2026 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/ENV ANALYSIS - J 97,826.50 0.00

01.18.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 97,826.50 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/ENV A 04254 Claim 2026-56 07/16/2026 102150 Regular 0.00 256.44 74 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 13 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2026-56 Invoice 06/30/2026 2026 PROPERTY TAX REBATE 256.44 0.00

01.00.40106 PENSION OVERRIDE - SEC 108.00 PENSION OVERRIDE TAX

01.00.40201 MUNI SERVICES 78.00 MUNICIPAL SERVICES (GENERAL

27.00.40205 LIBRARY TAX 70.44 LIBRARY PARCEL TAX
00072 Comcast 07/16/2026 102151 Regular 0.00 217.64
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 049-06222026 Invoice 07/01/2026 049 - TH UTILITIES - 06.27.2026-07.26.202 217.64 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 217.64 049 - TH UTILITIES - 06.27.2026- 01348 Community Media Center of Marin 07/16/2026 102152 Regular 0.00 1,071.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2526.09.30.204 Invoice 06/30/2026 VIDEO PRODUCTION - PUBLIC MTGS - JUN 1,071.00 0.00

01.12.61194 OUTSIDE SERVICES - GRA 841.50 VIDEO PRODUCTION - TOWN C

01.18.61194 OUTSIDE SERVICES - GRA 229.50 VIDEO PRODUCTION - PLANNIN 00462 County of Marin - Marin.Org 07/16/2026 102153 Regular 0.00 8,595.48 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 3443 Invoice 06/30/2026 AT&T MIDAS NETWORK ACCESS - APR-JU 8,595.48 0.00

21.65.61106 OUTSIDE SVCS-MGT INFO 3,195.48 AT&T MIDAS NETWORK ACCESS

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 5,400.00 MIDAS SERVICE NETWORK - AP 02581 CSG Consultants 07/16/2026 102154 Regular 0.00 10,094.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount B260967 Invoice 06/30/2026 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES - JUN 2 10,094.00 0.00

01.19.61157 PLAN CHECKING 10,094.00 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVIC 03853 Dana V. Beck 07/16/2026 102155 Regular 0.00 5,250.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount RVFH20-LS-INVOI Invoice 06/26/2026 FH20 - LANDSCAPING PROJECT MGMT - 5,250.00 0.00

01.32.61506 BLDG. MAINT-OTHER 3,150.00 FH20 - LANDSCAPING PROJECT

15.90.63100 CONSTRUCTION 150.00 FH20 - LANDSCAPING PROJECT

17.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 1,950.00 FH20 - LANDSCAPING PROJECT 04281 Daniel Rabb 07/16/2026 102156 Regular 0.00 1,502.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2017-03 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1212 SIR FRANCI 1,502.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,502.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1212 SI 00533 Davis Sign Company 07/16/2026 102157 Regular 0.00 2,887.96 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 41725 Invoice 06/18/2026 TEMPORARY TWO-WAY SIGN REORDER 633.65 0.00

60.14.62903 LIVE ON THE AVENUE 633.65 TEMPORARY TWO-WAY SIGN RE 41771 Invoice 06/26/2026 NO PARKING TOW AWAY SIGNS REORDER 1,857.25 0.00

01.42.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 1,857.25 NO PARKING TOW AWAY SIGNS 41808 Invoice 07/06/2026 CREEK PARK QR/ RESILIENCE HUB/LOTA P 397.06 0.00

01.12.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 13.11 CREEK PARK QR/ RESILIENCE HU

15.90.63100 CONSTRUCTION 109.25 CREEK PARK QR/ RESILIENCE HU

60.14.62903 LIVE ON THE AVENUE 274.70 CREEK PARK QR/ RESILIENCE HU 00080 Department of Justice 07/16/2026 102158 Regular 0.00 32.00 75 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 14 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 057300 Invoice 06/30/2026 FINGERPRINT APPS - ST&PK - JUN 2026 32.00 0.00

01.42.61806 OUTSIDE SERVICES MISC 32.00 FINGERPRINT APPS - ST&PK - JU 04299 Dodge Riedy 07/16/2026 102159 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK2009 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 273 BUTTERFIEL 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 273 BU 01970 Dog Waste Depot 07/16/2026 102160 Regular 0.00 4,457.40 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 822212 Invoice 06/24/2026 DOG WASTE ROLL BAGS PALLET 4,457.40 0.00

01.81.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 4,457.40 DOG WASTE ROLL BAGS PALLET 00266 Edwin P Gurka, Jr 07/16/2026 102161 Regular 0.00 1,193.75 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 12-2026 Invoice 06/23/2026 ARBORIST SERVICES - MAY/JUNE 2026 1,193.75 0.00

01.42.61105 OUTSIDE SERVICES-TREES 1,193.75 ARBORIST SERVICES - MAY/JUNE 04300 Elena Cuneo 07/16/2026 102162 Regular 0.00 50,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-UG-B2022-0 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - UNDERGROUNDING - 10 CREST 50,000.00 0.00

01.00.20377 Undergrounding Deposit 50,000.00 REFUND - UNDERGROUNDING - 04264 Elizabeth Vaughan 07/16/2026 102163 Regular 0.00 1,250.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK8385 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 34 RIDGE ROAD 1,250.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,250.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 34 RID 04288 Ellen Jenkins 07/16/2026 102164 Regular 0.00 12,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2019-01 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 260 CRESCENT R 12,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 12,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 260 CR 04294 Erin Heath 07/16/2026 102165 Regular 0.00 9,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2020-05 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 75 JONES ST 4,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 4,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 75 JON REF-RB-PTK4486 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 101 ROSS AVE 5,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 5,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 101 RO 00092 Ewing Irrigation Products 07/16/2026 102166 Regular 0.00 108.06 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 30999738 Invoice 07/06/2026 MEMORIAL PK - IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 108.06 0.00

01.81.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 108.06 MEMORIAL PK - IRRIGATION SU 00017 Fairfax Building Supply Co. Inc. 07/16/2026 102167 Regular 0.00 207.48 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 313110 Invoice 06/25/2026 DEPT SUPPLIES - SHIMS/SCREWS/BITS 60.65 0.00

01.42.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 60.65 DEPT SUPPLIES - SHIMS/SCREW 76 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 15 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number 313277 Invoice 06/30/2026 DEPT SUPPLIES - FAST SET CONCRETE/SHI 77.11 0.00

01.42.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 77.11 DEPT SUPPLIES - FAST SET CONC 313514 Invoice 07/07/2026 ROBSON - DET SUPPLIES - YELLOWJACKET 69.72 0.00

01.81.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 69.72 ROBSON - DET SUPPLIES - YELLO 03777 Friends of San Anselmo Parks 07/16/2026 102168 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1941 Invoice 07/13/2026 DONATION - STAMINA FITNESS TRAINING 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.49012 OTHER MISC REVENUE 1,000.00 DONATION - STAMINA FITNESS 04279 Gabriel Block 07/16/2026 102169 Regular 0.00 2,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK6112 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 53 BERKELEY AVE 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 53 BER 02278 Gardeners' Guild 07/16/2026 102170 Regular 0.00 6,525.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 125988 Invoice 07/01/2026 SFD MEDIANS - JUL 2026 1,200.00 0.00

01.42.61144 Outside Services Medians 1,200.00 SFD MEDIANS - JUL 2026 126024 Invoice 07/01/2026 RED HILL MEDIAN - JUL 2026 2,584.00 0.00

01.42.61144 Outside Services Medians 2,584.00 RED HILL MEDIAN - JUL 2026 126025 Invoice 07/01/2026 IMAGINATION PK/MAGNOLIA LOT - JUL 2 2,450.00 0.00

01.81.61104 OUTSIDE SERVICES-GROU 1,225.00 IMAGINATION PK/MAGNOLIA L

14.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 1,225.00 IMAGINATION PK/MAGNOLIA L 126129 Invoice 06/25/2026 IMAGINATION PK/MAGNOLIA LOT - IRRIG 291.00 0.00

14.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 291.00 IMAGINATION PK/MAGNOLIA L 04285 George Yandell 07/16/2026 102171 Regular 0.00 18,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2015-03 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 FERNWOOD D 15,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 15,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 FER REF-RB-B2015-04 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 FERNWOOD D 3,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 FER 00021 Good & Clean Company Inc 07/16/2026 102172 Regular 0.00 14,608.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 76629 Invoice 06/30/2026 GENERAL CLEANING SERVICES - JUN 2026 13,288.00 0.00

31.41.61501 BLDG. MAINT-JANITORIAL 2,825.00 ICC/REC DEPT

34.41.61501 BLDG. MAINT-JANITORIAL 1,775.00 ROBSON HOUSE

41.41.61501 BLDG. MAINT-JANITORIAL 7,413.00 UPPER TOWN HALL

60.14.62903 LIVE ON THE AVENUE 1,275.00 LIVE ON THE AVENUE 76630 Invoice 06/30/2026 CLEANING SERVICES - LOWER TOWN HALL 1,320.00 0.00

41.41.61501 BLDG. MAINT-JANITORIAL 1,320.00 CLEANING SERVICES - LOWER T 04297 Grace Fisher 07/16/2026 102173 Regular 0.00 5,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2017-02 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 318 THE ALAME 5,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 5,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 318 TH 01449 Graham Contractors Inc 07/16/2026 102174 Regular 0.00 65,000.00 77 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 16 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 033846 Invoice 06/30/2026 ANNUAL CRACK SEALING - FAIRFAX/SAN A 65,000.00 0.00

15.41.63100 CONSTRUCTION 65,000.00 ANNUAL CRACK SEALING - FAIRF 00020 Hannibal's Inc Electrical Construction 07/16/2026 102175 Regular 0.00 1,210.73 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 25520 Invoice 07/06/2026 GRIDSCAPE/BESS - FINAL TESTING 900.00 0.00

15.90.63100 CONSTRUCTION 900.00 GRIDSCAPE/BESS - FINAL TESTIN 25521 Invoice 07/06/2026 BOLINAS AVE - AUTO ACCIDENT SIGN LIG 310.73 0.00

01.42.61144 Outside Services Medians 310.73 BOLINAS AVE - AUTO ACCIDENT 04296 Harry Cocciolo 07/16/2026 102176 Regular 0.00 5,562.20 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2014-00 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 183 OAK AVE 5,562.20 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 5,562.20 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 183 OA 02586 HdL Software LLC 07/16/2026 102177 Regular 0.00 4,812.71 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount SIN064801 Invoice 05/31/2026 NEW ACCTS PROCESSED/COLLECTION PM 4,812.71 0.00

01.12.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 4,812.71 NEW ACCTS PROCESSED/COLLE 04282 Heather Hardcastle 07/16/2026 102178 Regular 0.00 1,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK4669 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 702 SAN ANSEL 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 702 SA 04255 Illinois Library Association 07/16/2026 102179 Regular 0.00 318.86 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 334508 Invoice 04/29/2026 iREAD PURCHASE 318.86 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 318.86 iREAD PURCHASE
00022 Jackson's Hardware Inc. 07/16/2026 102180 Regular 0.00 320.19 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 203411 Invoice 06/25/2026 ICC - DEPT SUPPLIES - CLOTHS/PEST TRAP 96.88 0.00

31.41.61506 BLDG. MAINT-OTHER 96.88 ICC - DEPT SUPPLIES - CLOTHS/P 203685 Invoice 06/30/2026 DEPT SUPPLIES - BRACKETS/CLAMPS/FAST 118.62 0.00

01.42.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 118.62 DEPT SUPPLIES - BRACKETS/CLA 203798 Invoice 07/02/2026 DEPT SUPPLIES - HANDLES/BOLTS/WASHE 33.69 0.00

01.42.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 33.69 DEPT SUPPLIES - HANDLES/BOLT 203804 Invoice 07/02/2026 ICC - DEADBOLT/KNOB STN 71.00 0.00

31.41.61506 BLDG. MAINT-OTHER 71.00 ICC - DEADBOLT/KNOB STN 04262 Jeff Sterley 07/16/2026 102181 Regular 0.00 1,800.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2021-03 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 72 GROVE LN 1,800.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,800.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 72 GRO 04270 Jon Austen 07/16/2026 102182 Regular 0.00 1,020.00 78 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 17 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK9119 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1310 SAN ANSEL 1,020.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,020.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1310 S 04273 Judith Holme Agnew 07/16/2026 102183 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2021-03 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 136 HILLDALE DR 3,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 136 HIL 04278 Julie Drummond 07/16/2026 102184 Regular 0.00 6,570.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2020-08 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 228 CRESCENT R 6,570.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 6,570.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 228 CR 04284 Kimberly Blue 07/16/2026 102185 Regular 0.00 1,990.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2019-02 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 105 BROOKSIDE 1,990.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,990.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 105 BR 01280 Kripa N. Davis 07/16/2026 102186 Regular 0.00 677.95 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 15841 Invoice 12/27/2016 REC DEPT - INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 387.40 0.00

21.62.61175 KIDS CULTURE SERVICES 387.40 REC DEPT - INSTRUCTOR PAYME 15842 Invoice 12/27/2016 REC DEPT - INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 290.55 0.00

21.62.61175 KIDS CULTURE SERVICES 290.55 REC DEPT - INSTRUCTOR PAYME 04258 Kurt Johnson 07/16/2026 102187 Regular 0.00 2,250.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2017-08 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 530 SCENIC AVE 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 530 SC REF-RB-B2018-01 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 530 SCENIC AVE 1,250.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,250.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 530 SC 04006 Kyocera Document Solutions Northern Californ 07/16/2026 102188 Regular 0.00 65.55 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 55E1880362 Invoice 07/01/2026 KCIM STARTER PLAN CONTRACT BASE - J 65.55 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 65.55 KCIM STARTER PLAN CONTRACT 04298 Lalita Khosla 07/16/2026 102189 Regular 0.00 1,380.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2019-06 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 39 BENNIT AVE 1,380.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,380.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 39 BEN 04257 LandCulture LLP 07/16/2026 102190 Regular 0.00 6,980.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1387 Invoice 05/19/2026 FH20 LANDSCAPE DESIGN PROJECT - MAR 6,980.00 0.00

15.32.63100 CONSTRUCTION 6,980.00 FH20 LANDSCAPE DESIGN PROJ 04292 Lassa Frank 07/16/2026 102191 Regular 0.00 4,000.00 79 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 18 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK5622 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1604 SIR FRANCI 4,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 4,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1604 SI 04275 Laura Reinertsen 07/16/2026 102192 Regular 0.00 4,029.40 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2016-02 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 17 WAVERLY RD 4,029.40 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 4,029.40 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 17 WA 00150 Marin Color Service Inc. 07/16/2026 102193 Regular 0.00 403.17 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount S0855473 Invoice 07/06/2026 LIBRARY - GLOSS CLEAR BASE 74.89 0.00

41.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 74.89 LIBRARY - GLOSS CLEAR BASE S0855496 Invoice 07/06/2026 LIBRARY - SATIN CLEAR BASE 74.89 0.00

41.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 74.89 LIBRARY - SATIN CLEAR BASE S0855677 Invoice 07/07/2026 PAINT RIG SUPPLIES - THINNER/FILTER/SE 253.39 0.00

01.42.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 253.39 PAINT RIG SUPPLIES - THINNER/ 01042 Marin County Tax Collector 07/16/2026 102194 Regular 0.00 13,365.34 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount FY2026-2027LAF Invoice 07/01/2026 FY26-27 LAFCO OPERATING EXP - MEMBE 13,365.34 0.00

01.21.61124 OUTSIDE SVCS-LAFCO 13,365.34 FY26-27 LAFCO OPERATING EXP 00145 Marin County Tax Collector 07/16/2026 102195 Regular 0.00 1,751.84 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 25-1116037 Invoice 07/01/2026 FY26-27 UNSECURED PROP TAX - ROBSON 1,280.95 0.00

34.41.62924 POSSESSORY TAX PAYME 1,280.95 FY26-27 UNSECURED PROP TAX 25-1116038 Invoice 07/01/2026 FY26-27 UNSECURED PROP TAX - ROBSON 470.89 0.00

34.41.62924 POSSESSORY TAX PAYME 470.89 FY26-27 UNSECURED PROP TAX 00121 Marin I J - 2072661 AD 07/16/2026 102196 Regular 0.00 119.94 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 0001479192 Invoice 06/30/2026 COLUMN - LEGAL NOTICES - JUN 2026 119.94 0.00

01.12.61151 LEGAL NOTICES 119.94 COLUMN - LEGAL NOTICES - JUN 00029 Marin IT 07/16/2026 102197 Regular 0.00 12,702.83 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2026-131903 Invoice 06/25/2026 PDU FOR COUNCIL SWITCH - QT2026-006 269.71 0.00

42.21.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 269.71 PDU FOR COUNCIL SWITCH - QT 2026-131907 Invoice 06/25/2026 11:11 OFFICE 365 BACKUPS - JUN 2026 212.38 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 212.38 11:11 OFFICE 365 BACKUPS - JU 2026-131947 Invoice 06/25/2026 CISCO DUO LICENSES - JUN 2026 432.00 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 432.00 CISCO DUO LICENSES - JUN 202 2026-131970 Invoice 06/29/2026 KNOWBE4 LICENSE TRUE-UP AUG 2025 637.50 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 637.50 KNOWBE4 LICENSE TRUE-UP AU 2026-132038 Invoice 07/09/2026 SMARTNET 2026-2027 CONTRACT RENEW 1,715.00 0.00

42.21.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 1,715.00 SMARTNET 2026-2027 CONTRA 2026-132050 Invoice 07/09/2026 SSL CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 119.99 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 119.99 SSL CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 2026-132055 Invoice 07/09/2026 RESILIENCE HUB SUPPORT - SYSTEMS ENG 145.00 0.00 80 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 19 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number

15.90.63100 CONSTRUCTION 145.00 RESILIENCE HUB SUPPORT - SYS 2026-132091 Invoice 06/30/2026 IT SUPPORT - JUN 2026 9,171.25 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 9,171.25 IT SUPPORT - JUN 2026 00142 Marin Municipal Water District 07/16/2026 102198 Regular 0.00 1,123.27 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 146216-0710202 Invoice 06/30/2026 146216 - 237 CRESCENT RD - 05.07.2026- 837.09 0.00

01.81.61703 UTILITIES-WATER 837.09 146216 - 237 CRESCENT RD - 05. 427307-0710202 Invoice 06/30/2026 427307 - 237 CRESCENT RD - 05.07.2026- 182.73 0.00

34.41.61703 UTILITIES-WATER 182.73 427307 - 237 CRESCENT RD - 05. 495073-0709202 Invoice 06/30/2026 495073 - CENTER/FORREST - 05.06.2026- 103.45 0.00

01.81.61703 UTILITIES-WATER 103.45 495073 - CENTER/FORREST - 05. 03228 MGE Engineering Inc 07/16/2026 102199 Regular 0.00 7,834.80 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 663.17 Invoice 06/24/2026 MADRONE/NOKOMIS BRIDGES - MAR-MA 7,181.90 0.00

15.41.63100 CONSTRUCTION 7,181.90 MADRONE/NOKOMIS BRIDGES - 741.06 Invoice 06/24/2026 BPMP SFD BLVD/BARBER AVE BRIDGES - 652.90 0.00

15.41.63100 CONSTRUCTION 652.90 BPMP SFD BLVD/BARBER AVE B 04272 Michael Blakeley 07/16/2026 102200 Regular 0.00 1,350.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2018-03 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 122 MORNINGSI 1,350.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,350.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 122 M 04283 Mike Kelly 07/16/2026 102201 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK7301 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 235 FLORIBEL AV 3,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 235 FL 03686 MKM Group Inc. 07/16/2026 102202 Regular 0.00 1,560.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 21129 Invoice 06/30/2026 50 TON CRANE SERVICE - HOIST CONCRET 1,560.00 0.00

01.42.61900 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1,560.00 50 TON CRANE SERVICE - HOIST 02431 Myrel Jenks 07/16/2026 102203 Regular 0.00 1,020.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2016-01 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 46 CORDONE DR 1,020.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,020.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 46 COR 01346 Nerviani Paving Inc 07/16/2026 102204 Regular 0.00 67,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 7900 Invoice 06/15/2026 ROBSON PK - ASPHALT REPLACEMENT 45 67,500.00 0.00

17.81.63100 CONSTRUCTION 67,500.00 ROBSON PK - ASPHALT REPLACE 04289 Norman Cieslewicz 07/16/2026 102205 Regular 0.00 2,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK4165 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 146 SYCAMORE A 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 146 SY 03524 Northwest Cascade, Inc. 07/16/2026 102206 Regular 0.00 3,823.65 81 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 20 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 0555635269 Invoice 07/01/2026 UNIT RENTALS 06.30.2026-07.27.2026 3,823.65 0.00

01.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 1,275.00 UNIT RENTALS 06.30.2026-07.2

60.14.62903 LIVE ON THE AVENUE 2,548.65 UNIT RENTALS 06.30.2026-07.2 00128 Pacific Gas & Electric 07/16/2026 102207 Regular 0.00 376.52 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 722-07032026 Invoice 06/30/2026 722 - MEMORIAL PARK EV - 05.29.2026-0 376.52 0.00

13.42.61114 OUTSIDE SRV: PARKING 376.52 722 - MEMORIAL PARK EV - 05.2 03523 Parametrix, Inc 07/16/2026 102208 Regular 0.00 33,966.96 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 80500 Invoice 06/30/2026 SFD BLVD/SUNNY HILLS DR SIGNAL - JUN 1,552.50 0.00

15.41.63100 CONSTRUCTION 1,552.50 SFD BLVD/SUNNY HILLS DR SIGN 80684 Invoice 06/30/2026 CREEK PARK BIKE LANE - JUNE 2026 32,414.46 0.00

14.41.63100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - CONST 32,414.46 CREEK PARK BIKE LANE - JUNE 2 02554 Parkmobile LLC 07/16/2026 102209 Regular 0.00 1,180.80 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV-US032-2026- Invoice 06/30/2026 END USER FEES - JUN 2026 1,180.80 0.00

13.42.61114 OUTSIDE SRV: PARKING 1,180.80 END USER FEES - JUN 2026 04256 Partners in Public Innovation 07/16/2026 102210 Regular 0.00 2,199.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1388 Invoice 06/26/2026 LEAN LEADERS ON-DEMAND TRAINING - S 2,199.00 0.00

01.18.61000 TRAINING 2,199.00 LEAN LEADERS ON-DEMAND TR 04266 Pete Giese 07/16/2026 102211 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2019-04 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 89 MAGNOLIA A 3,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 89 MA 02956 PUBLIC RISK, INNOVATION, SOLUTIONS AND MA 07/16/2026 102212 Regular 0.00 462.42 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 27400108 Invoice 07/01/2026 EMPLOYEE ASST PROGRAM - JUL-SEP 202 462.42 0.00

40.21.60202 EMPLOYEE ASST PRG PRE 462.42 EMPLOYEE ASST PROGRAM - JU 04286 PWP LLC 07/16/2026 102213 Regular 0.00 7,000.00
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2022-05 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 75 ESSEX ST 7,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 7,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 75 ESSE 02839 Quadient Finance USA, Inc 07/16/2026 102214 Regular 0.00 800.00 82 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 21 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 274-06212026 Invoice 06/21/2026 POSTAGE MACHINE - TOWN HALL - JUN 2 800.00 0.00

01.12.62003 POSTAGE 133.33 POSTAGE MACHINE - TOWN HA

01.18.62003 POSTAGE 133.33 POSTAGE MACHINE - TOWN HA

01.19.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 133.35 POSTAGE MACHINE - TOWN HA

01.41.62003 POSTAGE 133.33 POSTAGE MACHINE - TOWN HA

01.71.62003 POSTAGE 133.33 POSTAGE MACHINE - TOWN HA

01.82.62003 POSTAGE 133.33 POSTAGE MACHINE - TOWN HA
00339 Redwood Security Systems 07/16/2026 102215 Regular 0.00 825.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 4189349 Invoice 07/01/2026 FIRE MONITORING/MAINTENANCE - JUL- 825.00 0.00

34.41.61506 BLDG. MAINT-OTHER 210.00 FIRE MONITORING/MAINTENA

41.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 615.00 FIRE MONITORING/MAINTENA 04287 Richard Hochschild 07/16/2026 102216 Regular 0.00 4,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2014-01 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 444/456 LAUREL 4,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 4,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 444/45 04280 Robert A Josephs 07/16/2026 102217 Regular 0.00 1,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2017-07 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 25 CAMINO DE H 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 25 CA 04114 Robert Tuckey 07/16/2026 102218 Regular 0.00 1,600.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 32-22 Invoice 07/06/2026 MOUND CLAY - SUPER SACK DELIVERED 1,600.00 0.00

01.81.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 1,600.00 MOUND CLAY - SUPER SACK DEL 00181 Ross Valley Fire Department 07/16/2026 102219 Regular 0.00 12,798.41 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 260630SAQ4 Invoice 06/30/2026 RVFD PAYROLL EXPENSES FY2025-2026 Q 12,798.41 0.00

35.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 12,798.41 RVFD PAYROLL EXPENSES FY25- 02769 Ryan Lafrenz 07/16/2026 102220 Regular 0.00 2,750.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2014-00 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 77 OAK KNOLL A 2,750.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,750.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 77 OAK 02814 Sara Robinson 07/16/2026 102221 Regular 0.00 2,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2019-07 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 194 FLORIBEL AV 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 194 FL 04277 Sarita Patel 07/16/2026 102222 Regular 0.00 13,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK2849 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 SEQUOIA DR 6,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 6,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 SEQ REF-RB-PTK5298 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 SAN ANSELM 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 SAN 83 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 22 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number REF-RB-PTK5615 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 47 SEQUOIA DR 3,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 47 SEQ REF-RB-PTK6408 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 91 RED HILL AVE 3,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 91 RED 04277 Sarita Patel 07/23/2026 102222 Regular 0.00 -13,000.00 04261 Scott Russell 07/16/2026 102223 Regular 0.00 1,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2015-00 Invoice 07/15/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 112 SAN FRANCI 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 112 SA 00651 Sean Condry 07/16/2026 102224 Regular 0.00 13,308.60 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REIMB-CALPERS- Invoice 06/30/2026 REIMB - CALPERS 457 IN-SERVICE TRANSF 13,308.60 0.00

01.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 13,308.60 REIMB - CALPERS 457 IN-SERVIC 03696 Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. 07/16/2026 102225 Regular 0.00 6,213.26 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2026249 Invoice 06/30/2026 SORICH PARK BOTANICAL SURVEYS - APR- 6,213.26 0.00

35.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 6,213.26 SORICH PARK BOTANICAL SURVE 02624 Smith's Pest Management 07/16/2026 102226 Regular 0.00 949.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 411682 Invoice 06/27/2026 PEST CONTROL - MEMORIAL PARK - JUN 2 350.00 0.00

01.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 350.00 PEST CONTROL - MEMORIAL PA 411951 Invoice 06/28/2026 PEST CONTROL - IMAGINATION PARK - JU 309.00 0.00

14.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 309.00 PEST CONTROL - IMAGINATION 513C Invoice 06/28/2026 PEST CONTROL - SAN ANSELMO PARKS INI 290.00 0.00

21.65.61507 ICC LANDSCAPING MAINT 290.00 PEST CONTROL - SAN ANSELMO 02760 Stacey Kamp 07/16/2026 102227 Regular 0.00 1,900.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2018-06 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 234 SAN FRANCI 1,900.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,900.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 234 SA 01982 Stasia Leilani Winslow 07/16/2026 102228 Regular 0.00 765.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount WR11182018 Invoice 11/20/2018 REFEREE 765.00 0.00

21.61.61169 YOUTH SOCCER SERVICES 765.00 REFEREE
00347 Sutton Cunningham 07/16/2026 102229 Regular 0.00 6,050.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2019-06 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 67 YOLANDA DR 5,050.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 5,050.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 67 YOL REF-RB-PTK4269 Invoice 07/14/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 62 MADRONE AV 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 62 MA 02474 T2 SYSTEMS CANADA INC. 07/16/2026 102230 Regular 0.00 238.16 84 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 23 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 7001942 Invoice 05/31/2026 DIGITAL IRIS SERVICE - JUN 2026 238.16 0.00

13.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 238.16 DIGITAL IRIS SERVICE - JUN 2026 04263 Tatyana Mironova 07/16/2026 102231 Regular 0.00 1,300.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2016-06 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 7 HILLCREST CT 1,300.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,300.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 7 HILLC 04267 Ted Murphy 07/16/2026 102232 Regular 0.00 1,200.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2017-06 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 570 OAK AVE 1,200.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,200.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 570 OA 01230 Teressa DiPerna 07/16/2026 102233 Regular 0.00 960.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2015-04 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 209 BUTTERFIEL 960.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 960.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 209 BU 04271 Thomas Rex Hardy, AIA 07/16/2026 102234 Regular 0.00 11,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2016-05 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 30 MEDWAY RD 11,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 11,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 30 ME 04269 Timothy Hyer 07/16/2026 102235 Regular 0.00 1,474.50 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2021-00 Invoice 07/13/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 275 CRESCENT R 1,474.50 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,474.50 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 275 CR 03207 Toni Christine DeFrancis 07/16/2026 102236 Regular 0.00 160.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2026-TC623 Invoice 06/29/2026 TRANSCRIPTION - TOWN COUNCIL 06/23 160.00 0.00

01.12.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 160.00 TRANSCRIPTION - TOWN COUN 00215 Transbay Lock 07/16/2026 102237 Regular 0.00 58.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 96680 Invoice 07/02/2026 REKEYED LOCKS 58.00 0.00

31.41.61506 BLDG. MAINT-OTHER 58.00 REKEYED LOCKS
00384 Van Midde & Son Concrete 07/16/2026 102238 Regular 0.00 26,240.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 16087 Invoice 06/09/2026 ROBSON PK - ADA RAMP REPLACEMENT 10,840.00 0.00

17.81.63100 CONSTRUCTION 10,840.00 ROBSON PK - ADA RAMP REPLA 16110 Invoice 06/19/2026 ROBSON PK - ADA PARKING PAD REPLACE 15,400.00 0.00

17.81.63100 CONSTRUCTION 15,400.00 ROBSON PK - ADA PARKING PAD 02032 Annabelle Reber 07/22/2026 102239 Regular 0.00 9,591.20 85 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 24 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2015-03 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 166 PROSPECT A 9,591.20 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 9,591.20 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 166 PR 04313 Barbara Wunsch 07/22/2026 102240 Regular 0.00 3,250.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2022-01 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 72 OAK KNOLL A 3,250.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,250.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 72 OAK 04339 Chance Portillo 07/22/2026 102241 Regular 0.00 3,605.70 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2019-07 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 101 BROADMOO 3,605.70 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,605.70 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 101 BR 02942 Chris Parlette 07/22/2026 102242 Regular 0.00 2,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-ENC2021- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 14 RUTHERFORD 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 14 RUT REF-RB-POOL202 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 14 RUTHERFORD 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 14 RUT 04314 Christina Landles-Cobb 07/22/2026 102243 Regular 0.00 3,523.30 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2016-00 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 169 THE ALAME 3,523.30 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,523.30 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 169 TH 04346 Craig Thigpen 07/22/2026 102244 Regular 0.00 1,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2015-02 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1306 SAN ANSEL 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1306 S 04351 Daniel Reid 07/22/2026 102245 Regular 0.00 4,816.70 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2015-00 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 21 YOLANDA DR 4,816.70 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 4,816.70 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 21 YOL 04347 David Kramer 07/22/2026 102246 Regular 0.00 2,200.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2014-01 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 54 BROOKSIDE D 2,200.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,200.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 54 BRO 04343 Eamon Andrew Galbraith 07/22/2026 102247 Regular 0.00 1,200.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK7585 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 27 TAMALPAIS A 1,200.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,200.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 27 TAM 04288 Ellen Jenkins 07/22/2026 102248 Regular 0.00 1,500.00 86 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 25 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-ENC2020- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 260 CRESCENT R 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 260 CR 03331 Essence Goldman 07/22/2026 102249 Regular 0.00 550.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV0008576 Invoice 10/13/2022 10.10.2022 - SAN ANSELMO LIVE - BAND 550.00 0.00

60.14.62903 LIVE ON THE AVENUE 550.00 10.10.2022 - SAN ANSELMO LIV 03612 G Design LLC 07/22/2026 102250 Regular 0.00 9,045.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-2017-028 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 84 Florence 1,775.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,775.00 Road Bond Refund - 84 Florence REF-RB-B2022-06 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 130 Sycamore Ave 7,270.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 7,270.00 Road Bond Refund - 130 Sycam 04350 G Family Construction 07/22/2026 102251 Regular 0.00 16,795.80 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2016-05 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 52 Longview Ave 2,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 52 Longvie REF-RB-B2019-03 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 164 Los Angeles Blvd 3,535.80 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,535.80 Road Bond Refund - 164 Los An REF-RB-B2020-05 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 61 Monterey Ave 900.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 900.00 Road Bond Refund - 61 Montere REF-RB-B2021-07 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 54 Yolanda Dr 9,860.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 9,860.00 Road Bond Refund - 54 Yolanda 01544 Gabriella Drake 07/22/2026 102252 Regular 0.00 4,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK5672 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 166 BUTTERFIEL 3,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 166 BU REF-RB-PTK6414 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 761 SIR FRANCIS 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 761 SIR 04352 Gerry Hynes 07/22/2026 102253 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B5014-01 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 790 SIR FRANCIS 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 790 SIR 04353 GWL Living Trust 07/22/2026 102254 Regular 0.00 42,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2018-06 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 65 SEQUOIA DR 16,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 16,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 65 SEQ REF-RB-PTK2849 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 SEQUOIA DR 6,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 6,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 SEQ REF-RB-PTK4952 Invoice 07/22/2026 Road Bond Refund - 40 Park Way, 37 Sequ 13,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 13,000.00 Road Bond Refund - 40 Park Wa REF-RB-PTK5298 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 SAN ANSELM 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 SAN REF-RB-PTK5615 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 47 SEQUOIA DR 3,000.00 0.00 87 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 26 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 47 SEQ REF-RB-PTK6408 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 91 RED HILL AVE 3,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 3,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 91 RED 01850 Hardiman Construction 07/22/2026 102255 Regular 0.00 31,830.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 10172016 Invoice 10/26/2016 15 BERKELEY 150.00 0.00

19.41.63107 CAPITAL OUTLAY - PAVIN 150.00 15 BERKELEY
15 berkley Invoice 10/18/2016 SEWER LATERAL IMPROVEMENT WORK 150.00 0.00

01.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 150.00 SEWER LATERAL IMPROVEMENT REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 217 CRESCENT R 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 217 CR REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 56 OAK SPRINGS 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 56 OAK REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 REDWOOD RD 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 55 RED REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 294 THE ALAME 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 294 TH REF-RB-ENC2017- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 59 CORDONE DR 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 59 COR REF-RB-ENC2019- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 15 BROOKSIDE D 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 15 BRO REF-RB-ENC2019- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 49 AUSTIN AVE 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 49 AUS REF-RB-ENC2019- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 7 MAPLE LN 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 7 MAPL REF-RB-ENC2019- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1 HILLCREST AVE 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1 HILLC REF-RB-ENC2019- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 68 YOLANDA DR 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 68 YOL REF-RB-ENC2020- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 35 SALINAS AVE 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 35 SALI REF-RB-ENC2020- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 155 ALDER AVE 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 155 AL REF-RB-ENC2020- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1 LINCOLN PK 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 1 LINC REF-RB-ENC2020- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 158 PROSPECT A 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 158 PR REF-RB-ENC2021- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 53 CREEK RD 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 53 CRE REF-RB-ENC2021- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 48 SAN RAFAEL A 30.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 30.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 48 SAN REF-RB-ENC2022- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 20 VARBORG TER 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 20 VAR REF-RB-ENC2022- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 34 MERCED AVE 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 34 MER REF-RB-ENC2022- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 21 FLORIBEL AVE 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 21 FLO REF-RB-ENC2022- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 151 ALDER AVE 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 151 AL REF-RB-ENC2022- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 20 VINE AVE 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 20 VIN 88 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 27 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number REF-RB-P2016-01 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 6 MORNINGSIDE 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 6 MOR **Void** 07/22/2026 102256 Regular 0.00 0.00
04337 James Cole 07/22/2026 102257 Regular 0.00 2,321.80 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2014-01 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 84 BROADMOOR 2,321.80 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,321.80 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 84 BRO 04340 Jan Wu 07/22/2026 102258 Regular 0.00 1,000.00
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B202-046 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 2 FOOTHILL ROA 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 2 FOOT 02954 Jeff Kroot 07/22/2026 102259 Regular 0.00 10,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2018-07 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 7 Wood Court 7,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 7,000.00 Road Bond Refund - 7 Wood Co REF-RB-PTK5614 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 Road Bond Refund
REF-RB-PTK6436 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 Road Bond Refund
04334 Jeremiah Healy 07/22/2026 102260 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK592 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 81 ELM AVE 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 81 ELM 02316 Jessica Judge 07/22/2026 102261 Regular 0.00 1,316.10 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2021-02 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 98 HUMBOLDT A 1,316.10 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,316.10 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 98 HU 04338 Julie Terry 07/22/2026 102262 Regular 0.00 1,200.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2016-06 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 15 EL CERRITO A 1,200.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,200.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 15 EL C 04356 Kamala Tully 07/22/2026 102263 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2020-03 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 10 Entrata Ave 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 Road Bond Refund - 10 Entrata 01886 Kathryn Thornton 07/22/2026 102264 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK3602 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 9 CEDAR ST 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 9 CEDA REF-RB-PTK3805 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 9 CEDAR ST 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 9 CEDA 04317 Kaveh Alizadeh 07/22/2026 102265 Regular 0.00 1,922.00 89 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 28 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2014-01 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 531 OAK AVE 1,622.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,622.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 531 OA REF-RB-B2017-07 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 503 OAK AVE 300.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 300.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 503 OA 04357 Kelly Eyler 07/22/2026 102266 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK8380 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 Road Bond Refund
00956 Leyla Hilmi 07/22/2026 102267 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK4167 Invoice 07/22/2026 Road Bond Refund - 27 Tamalpais 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 Road Bond Refund - 27 Tamalpa 04358 Lisa Kemp 07/22/2026 102268 Regular 0.00 2,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK3993 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 17 Hillcrest Ave 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 Road Bond Refund - 17 Hillcrest 02675 Marjorie Sun 07/22/2026 102269 Regular 0.00 1,200.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2019-03 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 3 SANTA BARBAR 1,200.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,200.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 3 SANT 04359 Mary J Porter 07/22/2026 102270 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK6588 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 Road Bond Refund
04341 Peter Galli 07/22/2026 102271 Regular 0.00 1,250.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2018-02 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 151 BROADMOO 1,250.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,250.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 151 BR 04344 Philip Hynes 07/22/2026 102272 Regular 0.00 4,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK4866 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 11 ENCINA PLAC 4,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 4,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 11 ENC 04286 PWP LLC 07/22/2026 102273 Regular 0.00 43,670.00
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2019-03 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 60 ESSEX ST 10,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 10,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 60 ESSE REF-RB-B2022-04 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 121 SEQUOIA DR 7,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 7,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 121 SE REF-RB-B2022-05 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 5 BUNGALOW AV 4,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 4,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 5 BUN REF-RB-B2022-05 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 5 BUNGALOW AV 22,170.00 0.00 90 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 29 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 22,170.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 5 BUN 04349 Rebecca Houser 07/22/2026 102274 Regular 0.00 2,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK6405 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 Road Bond Refund
04336 Scott Rowitz 07/22/2026 102275 Regular 0.00 2,080.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2022-04 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 268 BROOKSIDE 2,080.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,080.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 268 BR 01368 Sewer Connection Inc 07/22/2026 102276 Regular 0.00 4,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-ENC2019- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 418 SCENIC AVE 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 418 SC REF-RB-ENC2020- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 119 Floribel Ave 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 119 Floribel REF-RB-ENC2021- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 20 Rancho Dr 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 20 Rancho 04355 Sewer Connection Inc. 07/22/2026 102277 Regular 0.00 27,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 169 THE ALAME 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund
REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 865 San Anselmo Ave 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 865 San An REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 64 Longwood Dr 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 64 Longwo REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 33 Salinas Ave 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 33 Salinas A REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund- 147 Oak Springs Dr 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund- 147 Oak Spr REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 127 Woodside Dr 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 127 Woodsi REF-RB-ENC2016- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 11 SUNNYSIDE A 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 11 SUN REF-RB-ENC2017- Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 100 CHIPMAN PL 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 100 CH REF-RB-ENC2017- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 29 Tamal Ave 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 29 Tamal A REF-RB-ENC2017- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 17 Waverly Rd 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 17 Waverly REF-RB-ENC2017- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 300 Greenfield Ave 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 300 Greenfi REF-RB-ENC2017- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 35 Grove Ln 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 35 Grove Ln REF-RB-ENC2017- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 7 Vine Ave 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 7 Vine Ave REF-RB-ENC2017- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 379 Oak Ave 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 379 Oak Av 91 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 30 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number REF-RB-ENC2018- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 5 Oak Springs Dr 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 5 Oak Sprin REF-RB-ENC2018- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 312 Scenic Ave 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 312 Scenic REF-RB-ENC2018- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 269 Butterfield Rd 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 269 BuƩerfi REF-RB-ENC2019- Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 100 Oak Knoll Ave 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 100 Oak Kn **Void** 07/22/2026 102278 Regular 0.00 0.00
04348 Skaggs Construction Co. 07/22/2026 102279 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2014-03 Invoice 07/21/2026 Road Bond Refund - 850 Sir Francis Drake 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 Road Bond Refund - 850 Sir Fran 03362 Stephanie Portillo 07/22/2026 102280 Regular 0.00 60.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2009463.002 Invoice 12/19/2022 12.19.2022 - REGISTRATION FEE - REFUND 60.00 0.00

21.61.48103 TUMBLING 60.00 12.19.2022 - REGISTRATION FEE 04335 Stephen Shaw 07/22/2026 102281 Regular 0.00 2,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK5365 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 62 TAMALPAIS A 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 62 TAM 04315 Swett Construction Inc 07/22/2026 102282 Regular 0.00 2,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2019-04 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 274 BUTTERFIEL 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 274 BU 01333 Sydney Smith 07/22/2026 102283 Regular 0.00 6,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK5744 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 89 MELVILLE AVE 6,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 6,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 89 MEL 04345 Tom Levine 07/22/2026 102284 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK5633 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 115 SUNNYSIDE 1,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 115 SU 04342 William Komoto 07/22/2026 102285 Regular 0.00 4,200.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2015-04 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 9 SANTA BARBAR 4,200.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 4,200.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 9 SANT 04316 William Schmidt 07/22/2026 102286 Regular 0.00 2,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK5839 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 20 SAN FRANCIS 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 20 SAN 02411 23 ELEPHANTS THEATRE COMPANY 07/23/2026 102287 Regular 0.00 9,450.00 92 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 31 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount SUMMER2026-W Invoice 07/22/2026 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 5 - ZOOTOPIA CA 9,450.00 0.00

21.63.61186 SPECIALTY CAMPS SERVIC 9,450.00 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 5 - ZOOT 02920 Amazon Business 07/23/2026 102288 Regular 0.00 3,601.28 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 147N-TTPN-CJWT Invoice 07/10/2026 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 196.88 0.00

01.71.62301 ADULT BOOKS 196.88 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 1611-9NCL-QGD Invoice 07/20/2026 REC - JONES - CAMPKIDMARIN MINI 28.38 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 28.38 REC - JONES - CAMPKIDMARIN 16MC-C6TX-GFVJ Invoice 07/20/2026 REC - JONES - CAMPKIDMARIN MINI 374.79 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 374.79 REC - JONES - CAMPKIDMARIN 19NL-TV4Q-L43F Invoice 07/20/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 419.05 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 419.05 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 19W6-MX6L-9YH Invoice 07/14/2026 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN MINI 43.88 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 43.88 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN 19W6-MX6L-C7N Invoice 07/14/2026 REC - LIN - OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.00 0.00

21.65.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.00 REC - LIN - OFFICE SUPPLIES 1CM6-KQT3-JNTV Invoice 07/13/2026 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 41.53 0.00

01.71.62301 ADULT BOOKS 41.53 LIB - KENTON - ADULT BOOKS 1F3Q-RXG7-RFK Invoice 07/14/2026 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN MINI 18.39 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 18.39 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN 1F6W-TKHM-C1P Invoice 06/30/2026 ST&PK - SHAW - DEPT SUPPLIES STREETS 108.24 0.00

01.42.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 108.24 ST&PK - SHAW - DEPT SUPPLIES 1H3T-RLJP-QW3N Invoice 07/13/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 43.32 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 43.32 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 1HGG-9WP3-PD Invoice 06/30/2026 ST&PK - SHAW - DEPT SUPPLIES STREETS 82.92 0.00

01.42.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 82.92 ST&PK - SHAW - DEPT SUPPLIES 1HJX-64GD-3MPF Invoice 07/16/2026 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN MINI 16.60 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 16.60 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN 1JVV-R64K-QY7X Invoice 07/20/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 499.30 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 499.30 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 1NC3-KKJ1-6TQW Invoice 07/13/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 484.33 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 484.33 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 1NWH-XXMF-QQ Invoice 07/14/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 495.52 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 495.52 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 1QY3-JRN7-N9HV Invoice 07/15/2026 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN MINI 26.21 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 26.21 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN 1R3C-MJ1V-PLC1 Invoice 07/14/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 13.86 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 13.86 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 1R3C-MJ1V-RYQJ Invoice 07/14/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 197.43 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 197.43 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI 1RGH-KFJD-3FW Invoice 07/14/2026 REC - LIN - DEPT SUPPLIES 68.13 0.00

21.65.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 68.13 REC - LIN - DEPT SUPPLIES 1TJC-HDDV-YYND Invoice 07/16/2026 REC - LIN - SPECIAL EVENT 18.00 0.00

21.64 SPECIAL EVENT EXPENSE 18.00 REC - LIN - SPECIAL EVENT 1W4X-LFT1-W7FF Invoice 07/15/2026 REC- JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN MINI 99.17 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 99.17 REC- JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN 1W4X-LFT1-XWM Invoice 07/15/2026 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN MINI 208.70 0.00

21.63.62985 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI S 208.70 REC - JONES - CAMP KIDMARIN 1XJQ-X7K7-7W4V Invoice 07/06/2026 REC - LIN - OFFICE SUPPLIES 53.52 0.00 93 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 32 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number

21.65.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 53.52 REC - LIN - OFFICE SUPPLIES 1XNR-MMHJ-46N Invoice 07/13/2026 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHTY 46.13 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 46.13 REC - HILLARD - CAMP KIDMARI **Void** 07/23/2026 102289 Regular 0.00 0.00
02806 AQUASCAPE POOL SERVICE 07/23/2026 102290 Regular 0.00 449.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 40472 Invoice 06/30/2026 MONTHLY POOL SERVICE - JUN 2026 449.00 0.00

14.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 449.00 MONTHLY POOL SERVICE - JUN 04183 Arborist Now Inc 07/23/2026 102291 Regular 0.00 4,836.34 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 28170 Invoice 07/15/2026 HILLDALE PARK - LOG STRUCTURE RELOCA 4,836.34 0.00

17.81.63100 CONSTRUCTION 4,836.34 HILLDALE PARK - LOG STRUCTUR 00001 AT&T Calnet 07/23/2026 102292 Regular 0.00 168.41 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 000025528763 Invoice 06/30/2026 574 - ALL DEPTS CENTREX - 06.10.2026-07 73.30 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 73.30 574 - ALL DEPTS CENTREX - 06.1 000025528767 Invoice 06/30/2026 579 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODEM - 06.10.20 32.14 0.00

01.41.61705 UTILITIES-TELEPHONE 32.14 579 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODEM - 000025528768 Invoice 06/30/2026 580 - ROBSON HOUSE - 06.10.2026-07.09. 62.97 0.00

34.41.61705 UTILITIES-TELEPHONE 62.97 580 - ROBSON HOUSE - 06.10.2 00276 BK Krill Corp 07/23/2026 102293 Regular 0.00 200.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1752 Invoice 06/10/2026 DESIGN - FLYER/SOCIAL FLOODHORN/HILL 200.00 0.00

01.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 200.00 DESIGN - FLYER/SOCIAL FLOODH 01534 Christine O'Rourke 07/23/2026 102294 Regular 0.00 1,218.75 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1032 Invoice 06/30/2026 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN UPDATE - APR-JU 1,218.75 0.00

90.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 1,218.75 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN UPDATE 02581 CSG Consultants 07/23/2026 102295 Regular 0.00 13,531.75 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 65334 Invoice 03/13/2026 ON-CALL PLANNING SERVICE - FEB 2026 2,863.25 0.00

01.18.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 2,863.25 ON-CALL PLANNING SERVICE - F 65749 Invoice 04/10/2026 ON-CALL PLANNING SERVICES - FEB-MAR 4,532.75 0.00

01.18.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 4,532.75 ON-CALL PLANNING SERVICES - 67009 Invoice 06/30/2026 ON-CALL PLANNING SERVICES - JUN 2026 4,137.75 0.00

01.18.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 4,137.75 ON-CALL PLANNING SERVICES - 67033 Invoice 06/30/2026 BLDG INSPECTOR - JUN 2026 1,968.00 0.00

01.19.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 1,968.00 BLDG INSPECTOR - JUN 2026 B260967-Rev1 Invoice 06/30/2026 REVISION - BLDG PLAN REVIEW - JUN 202 30.00 0.00

01.19.61157 PLAN CHECKING 30.00 REVISION - BLDG PLAN REVIEW 01320 DC Electric Group Inc 07/23/2026 102296 Regular 0.00 16,826.53 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 480149 Invoice 06/30/2026 M5007 SL ROUTINE - JUN 2026 704.16 0.00

01.42.61131 OUTSIDE SVCS-STREET LI 704.16 M5007 SL ROUTINE - JUN 2026 94 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 33 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number 480150 Invoice 06/30/2026 M5008 - SL RESPONSE - JUN 2026 944.17 0.00

01.42.61131 OUTSIDE SVCS-STREET LI 944.17 M5008 - SL RESPONSE - JUN 202 480203 Invoice 06/30/2026 M1007 TS ROUTINE - JUN 2026 9,407.49 0.00

01.42.61130 OUTSIDE SVCS-SIGNALS 9,407.49 M1007 TS ROUTINE - JUN 2026 480204 Invoice 06/30/2026 M1008 TS RESPONSE - JUN 2026 5,770.71 0.00

01.42.61130 OUTSIDE SVCS-SIGNALS 5,770.71 M1008 TS RESPONSE - JUN 202 00035 Demco Inc 07/23/2026 102297 Regular 0.00 242.51
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 7824829 Invoice 07/01/2026 LIBRARY - DVD/BLURAY CASES/STEPSTOO 242.51 0.00

01.71.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 242.51 LIBRARY - DVD/BLURAY CASES/S 00092 Ewing Irrigation Products 07/23/2026 102298 Regular 0.00 56.47 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 31045688 Invoice 07/08/2026 MEMORIAL PARK - PVC/HOT BLUE GLUE 56.47 0.00

01.81.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 56.47 MEMORIAL PARK - PVC/HOT BL 00017 Fairfax Building Supply Co. Inc. 07/23/2026 102299 Regular 0.00 104.56 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 313579 Invoice 07/08/2026 DEPT SUPPLIES - PESTBLOCK 26.14 0.00

31.41.61506 BLDG. MAINT-OTHER 26.14 DEPT SUPPLIES - PESTBLOCK 313638 Invoice 07/09/2026 PARKS - THREADLOCKER 19.60 0.00

01.81.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 19.60 PARKS - THREADLOCKER 313654 Invoice 07/10/2026 ROBSON - SUPPLY LINE 17.64 0.00

34.41.61506 BLDG. MAINT-OTHER 17.64 ROBSON - SUPPLY LINE 313709 Invoice 07/11/2026 FLOWER BASKETS - FERTILIZER 41.18 0.00

95.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 41.18 FLOWER BASKETS - FERTILIZER 03776 GFDS Engineers, Inc. 07/23/2026 102300 Regular 0.00 125.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 26005.00-2-ADDT Invoice 03/11/2026 ADDTL PROFESSIONAL SVCS - BB2 - FEB 2 125.00 0.00

01.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 125.00 ADDTL PROFESSIONAL SVCS - B 00104 Grier Argall Plumbing Inc 07/23/2026 102301 Regular 0.00 832.43 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 20645 Invoice 07/08/2026 TOWN HALL - FLUSHOMETER LEAK 832.43 0.00

41.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 832.43 TOWN HALL - FLUSHOMETER LE 00022 Jackson's Hardware Inc. 07/23/2026 102302 Regular 0.00 260.76 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 204142 Invoice 07/09/2026 ICC - CORNICE VENT/GABLE LOUVER 118.75 0.00

34.41.61506 BLDG. MAINT-OTHER 118.75 ICC - CORNICE VENT/GABLE LOU 204180 Invoice 07/09/2026 ROBSON - CHROME BATH FAUCET 142.01 0.00

34.41.61506 BLDG. MAINT-OTHER 142.01 ROBSON - CHROME BATH FAUC 04318 James Campbell 07/23/2026 102303 Regular 0.00 1,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2025-01 Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 146 CALUMET AV 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 146 CA 01586 John A. Godsey 07/23/2026 102304 Regular 0.00 1,750.19 95 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 34 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 29933 Invoice 07/20/2026 TOWN ENVELOPES - WINDOW QTY 2500/ 1,750.19 0.00

01.12.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 634.74 TOWN ENVELOPES - WINDOW

01.18.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 371.82 TOWN ENVELOPES - WINDOW

01.19.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 371.82 TOWN ENVELOPES - WINDOW

01.41.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 371.81 TOWN ENVELOPES - WINDOW 03845 Justin Ryan 07/23/2026 102305 Regular 0.00 4,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-B2024-04 Invoice 07/21/2026 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 21 IDALIA CT 4,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 4,000.00 REFUND - ROAD BOND - 21 IDAL 04116 Katite Gumucio 07/23/2026 102306 Regular 0.00 600.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount FAYC-JUL2026 Invoice 07/22/2026 FOREVER ACTIVE YOGA CLASS - JUL 2026 600.00 0.00

21.64 OLDER ADUILT PROGRAM 600.00 FOREVER ACTIVE YOGA CLASS - 03549 Kid's Choice Camps LLC 07/23/2026 102307 Regular 0.00 945.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount SUMMER2026-W Invoice 07/22/2026 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 5 - DND CAMP 945.00 0.00

21.63.61186 SPECIALTY CAMPS SERVIC 945.00 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 5 - DND 00377 Luis Quezada 07/23/2026 102308 Regular 0.00 10,005.80 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount USASC-JUL2026-0 Invoice 07/22/2026 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER 2026 - 07/ 1,879.50 0.00

21.63.61183 CAMP SPORTS SERVICES 1,879.50 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER USASC-JUL2026-0 Invoice 07/22/2026 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER 2026 - 07/ 2,921.80 0.00

21.63.61183 CAMP SPORTS SERVICES 2,921.80 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER USASC-JUL2026-0 Invoice 07/22/2026 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER 2026 - 07/ 4,644.50 0.00

21.63.61183 CAMP SPORTS SERVICES 4,644.50 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER USASC-JUN2026- Invoice 06/30/2026 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER 2026 - JUN 560.00 0.00

21.63.61183 CAMP SPORTS SERVICES 560.00 USA SOCCER CAMP - SUMMER 00029 Marin IT 07/23/2026 102309 Regular 0.00 2,566.25
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 2026-131908 Invoice 06/30/2026 11:11 CLOUD BACKUPS - JUN 2026 144.57 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 144.57 11:11 CLOUD BACKUPS - JUN 20 2026-132021 Invoice 07/15/2026 TEAMS PHONE ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION F 75.36 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 75.36 TEAMS PHONE ANNUAL SUBSC 2026-132162 Invoice 06/30/2026 KNOWBE4 - IT MGMT - JUN 2026 253.75 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 253.75 KNOWBE4 - IT MGMT - JUN 202 2026-132170 Invoice 07/15/2026 MONTHLY SOC SERVICE - JUL 2026 1,676.86 0.00

01.12.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 838.43 MONTHLY SOC SERVICE - JUL 20

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 838.43 MONTHLY SOC SERVICE - JUL 20 2026-132177 Invoice 06/30/2026 QUALYS VULNERABILITY SCANNING - JUN 415.71 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 415.71 QUALYS VULNERABILITY SCANNI 00142 Marin Municipal Water District 07/23/2026 102310 Regular 0.00 18,983.92 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 135752-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 135752 - SUNNYHILLS DR - 05.09.2026-07 8,868.52 0.00

01.81.61703 UTILITIES-WATER 8,868.52 135752 - SUNNYHILLS DR - 05.0 96 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 35 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number 137808-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 137808 - TOWN HALL - 05.09.2026-07.09. 1,093.27 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 1,093.27 137808 - TOWN HALL - 05.09.20 145943-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 145943 - 237 CRESCENT RD - 05.09.2026- 2,411.95 0.00

32.81.61703 UTILITIES-WATER 1,205.98 145943 - 237 CRESCENT RD - 05.

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 1,205.97 145943 - 237 CRESCENT RD - 05. 165152-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 165152 - SF BLVD - 05.09.2026-07.09.202 724.99 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 724.99 165152 - SF BLVD - 05.09.2026- 406665-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 406665 - SF BLVD - 05.09.2026-07.09.202 173.70 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 173.70 406665 - SF BLVD - 05.09.2026- 535495-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 535495 - MAGNOLIA AVE - 05.09.2026-07 165.45 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 165.45 535495 - MAGNOLIA AVE - 05.0 545622-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 545622- IMAGINATION PK - 05.09.2026-0 87.69 0.00

14.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 87.69 545622- IMAGINATION PK - 05.0 545623-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 545623 - IMAGINATION PK - 05.09.2026-0 87.69 0.00

14.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 87.69 545623 - IMAGINATION PK - 05. 54624-07142026 Invoice 06/30/2026 545624 - IMAGINATION PK - 05.09.2026-0 87.69 0.00

14.81.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 87.69 545624 - IMAGINATION PK - 05. 547939-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 547939 - 634 SAN ANSELMO - 05.09.2026 87.69 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 87.69 547939 - 634 SAN ANSELMO - 0 549761-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 549761 - REDHILL/SEQUOIA - 05.09.2026- 3,537.61 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 3,537.61 549761 - REDHILL/SEQUOIA - 05 700120-0714202 Invoice 06/30/2026 700120 - MULTIPLE - 05.09.2026-07.09.20 1,657.67 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 1,657.67 700120 - MULTIPLE - 05.09.2026 04361 Michael Kamerick 07/23/2026 102311 Regular 0.00 2,144.47 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REIMB-CAC-2026 Invoice 07/21/2026 REIMB - CLIMATE ACTION COMM OUTRE 2,144.47 0.00

90.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 2,144.47 REIMB - CLIMATE ACTION COM 04361 Michael Kamerick 07/30/2026 102311 Regular 0.00 -2,144.47 00609 Midwest Tape 07/23/2026 102312 Regular 0.00 82.01 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 509104312 Invoice 07/07/2026 LIBRARY - BLURAY/DVDS 82.01 0.00

01.71.62307 VIDEOS 82.01 LIBRARY - BLURAY/DVDS
01916 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ATHLETICS 07/23/2026 102313 Regular 0.00 3,224.20 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount SPORTS-JUL2026 Invoice 07/22/2026 ALL SORTS OF SPORTS CAMP - JUL 2026 3,224.20 0.00

21.63.61183 CAMP SPORTS SERVICES 3,224.20 ALL SORTS OF SPORTS CAMP - J 01949 Paige Gaines 07/23/2026 102314 Regular 0.00 150.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-PF-B2026-00 Invoice 07/22/2026 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 415 SCENIC AVE 150.00 0.00

01.00.48057 PLANNING FEES 150.00 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 415 SC 03297 PBC Guru 07/23/2026 102315 Regular 0.00 3,500.00
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV-507032 Invoice 07/09/2026 FY26-27 LIBRARY SPEAKER CONSORTIUM 3,500.00 0.00

27.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 3,500.00 FY26-27 LIBRARY SPEAKER CON 01139 Phillips Seabrook Associates 07/23/2026 102316 Regular 0.00 1,092.50 97 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 36 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 260264 Invoice 07/21/2026 PROGRESS BILLING - B2025-0157 - 257 CR 1,092.50 0.00

01.19.61157 PLAN CHECKING 1,092.50 PROGRESS BILLING - B2025-015 03579 Recreation Reimagined Inc 07/23/2026 102317 Regular 0.00 5,576.06 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount SUMMER2026-W Invoice 07/22/2026 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 5 - CAMP WILDFL 2,044.00 0.00

21.63.61186 SPECIALTY CAMPS SERVIC 2,044.00 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 5 - CAM SUMMER2026-W Invoice 07/22/2026 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 6 - CAMP WILDFL 3,532.06 0.00

21.63.61186 SPECIALTY CAMPS SERVIC 3,532.06 SUMMER 2026 - WEEK 6 - CAM 04067 Reid Miles 07/23/2026 102318 Regular 0.00 667.05
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-PF-PRO2025- Invoice 07/20/2026 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 24 RANCHO DR 667.05 0.00

01.00.48058 PLANNING TECHNOLOGY 667.05 REFUND - PERMIT FEES - 24 RA 01563 SCA 07/23/2026 102319 Regular 0.00 12,839.30
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount CA0944416 Invoice 06/30/2026 RESIDENTIAL STREET SWEEPER - JUN 202 12,839.30 0.00

01.42.61135 OUTSIDE SERVICES STREE 12,839.30 RESIDENTIAL STREET SWEEPER - 03602 Serge Ndjemba 07/23/2026 102320 Regular 0.00 1,862.38 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount FIC-2026-WK2 Invoice 06/30/2026 2026 FRENCH IMMERSION CAMP - WEEK 1,862.38 0.00

21.63.61186 SPECIALTY CAMPS SERVIC 1,862.38 2026 FRENCH IMMERSION CAM 04355 Sewer Connection Inc. 07/23/2026 102321 Regular 0.00 1,500.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-ENC2019- Invoice 07/22/2026 Road Bond Refund - 28 Oakland Ave 1,500.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 1,500.00 Road Bond Refund - 28 Oakland 03212 Steven Anthony Teijeiro Jr 07/23/2026 102322 Regular 0.00 770.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount SC-JUL2026 Invoice 07/22/2026 SKATE CAMP - JUL 2026 770.00 0.00

21.63.61183 CAMP SPORTS SERVICES 770.00 SKATE CAMP - JUL 2026 03816 Stacy Rona Sias 07/23/2026 102323 Regular 0.00 6,000.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB-PTK2674 Invoice 07/23/2026 Road Bond Refund - 160 Sturdivant 6,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 6,000.00 Road Bond Refund - 160 Sturdiv 02083 Lily McLean 07/30/2026 102324 Regular 0.00 300.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount WR11272017 Invoice 11/29/2017 REC DEPT - SOCCER COACH 300.00 0.00

21.61.61169 YOUTH SOCCER SERVICES 300.00 REC DEPT - SOCCER COACH 04315 Swett Construction Inc 07/30/2026 102325 Regular 0.00 2,000.00 98 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 37 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount REF-RB--B2019-0 Invoice 07/30/2026 Refund - Road Bond - 274 Butterfield Rd 2,000.00 0.00

01.00.20314 ROAD BOND 2,000.00 Refund - Road Bond - 274 BuƩer 02905 Wells Fargo Vendor Financial Services, LLC 07/01/2026 DFT07026 Bank Draft 0.00 -833.23 00391 Verizon Wireless 07/01/2026 DFT07057 Bank Draft 0.00 687.17 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 6145970282 Invoice 06/12/2026 WIRELESS - 05.13.2026-05.13.2026 687.17 0.00

01.12.61705 UTILITIES-TELEPHONE 40.04 WIRELESS - 05.13.2026-05.13.2

01.41.61705 UTILITIES-TELEPHONE 280.22 WIRELESS - 05.13.2026-05.13.2

01.42.61705 UTILITIES-TELEPHONE 96.74 WIRELESS - 05.13.2026-05.13.2

01.81.62206 Snack Shack 40.01 WIRELESS - 05.13.2026-05.13.2

13.30.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 115.08 WIRELESS - 05.13.2026-05.13.2

21.63.61179 PARKSIDE SERVICES 76.72 WIRELESS - 05.13.2026-05.13.2

21.63.61187 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 38.36 WIRELESS - 05.13.2026-05.13.2 00362 Town of San Anselmo 07/07/2026 DFT07090 Bank Draft 0.00 376,769.74 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV0016879 Invoice 07/07/2026 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll 376,769.74 0.00

01.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 244,063.91 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

01.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 3,521.95 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

01.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 376.68 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

01.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE -964.07 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

13.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 774.56 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

13.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE -1.42 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

15.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 7,933.46 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

19.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 14,828.97 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

21.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 86,163.01 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

27.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 14,600.59 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

31.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 397.90 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

34.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 397.90 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

41.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 397.99 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

42.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 1,043.42 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

60.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 1,216.45 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

95.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 2,018.44 7-15-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll 01662 CalPERS 07/24/2026 DFT07091 Bank Draft 0.00 275,396.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 10000001834151 Invoice 07/08/2026 FY2026-2027 UAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTI 275,396.00 0.00

01.21.60100 RETIREMENT 275,396.00 FY2026-2027 UAL EMPLOYER C 00072 Comcast 07/05/2026 DFT07093 Bank Draft 0.00 235.39 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 426-06092026 Invoice 06/09/2026 426 - CREEK CAMERA - 06.14.2026-07.13. 235.39 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 235.39 426 - CREEK CAMERA - 06.14.20 00128 Pacific Gas & Electric 07/09/2026 DFT07095 Bank Draft 0.00 34.24 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 717-07052026 Invoice 06/30/2026 717 - CORPYARD UTILITIES - 06.04.2026-0 34.24 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 34.24 717 - CORPYARD UTILITIES - 06. 00362 Town of San Anselmo 07/10/2026 DFT07106 Bank Draft 0.00 16,753.09 99 Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 38 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV0016893 Invoice 07/10/2026 7-15-2026 TSA Condry Final Pay 16,753.09 0.00

01.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 11,727.35 7-15-2026 TSA Condry Final Pay

15.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 5,025.74 7-15-2026 TSA Condry Final Pay 00072 Comcast 07/12/2026 DFT07108 Bank Draft 0.00 274.44 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 583-06162026 Invoice 07/01/2026 583 - CORPYARD INTERNET - 06.21.2026-0 274.44 0.00

42.21.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 274.44 583 - CORPYARD INTERNET - 06. 00128 Pacific Gas & Electric 07/27/2026 DFT07109 Bank Draft 0.00 230.28 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 216-07102026 Invoice 06/30/2026 216 - IMAGINATION PARK - 06.05.2026-07 230.28 0.00

14.81.61701 UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY 230.28 216 - IMAGINATION PARK - 06.0 00128 Pacific Gas & Electric 07/14/2026 DFT07110 Bank Draft 0.00 701.01 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 355-07092026 Invoice 06/30/2026 355 - CORPYARD UTILITIES - 06.05.2026-0 701.01 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 701.01 355 - CORPYARD UTILITIES - 06. 00128 Pacific Gas & Electric 07/14/2026 DFT07111 Bank Draft 0.00 2,105.06 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 146-07102026 Invoice 06/30/2026 146 - EV CHARGING - 06.05.2026-07.05.2 2,105.06 0.00

13.42.61114 OUTSIDE SRV: PARKING 2,105.06 146 - EV CHARGING - 06.05.202 00072 Comcast 07/14/2026 DFT07123 Bank Draft 0.00 182.44 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 758-06192026 Invoice 07/01/2026 758 - TH INTERNET - 06.24.2026-07.23.20 182.44 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 182.44 758 - TH INTERNET - 06.24.2026 00402 US Bank 07/01/2026 DFT07124 Bank Draft 0.00 15,256.60 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV0016905 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.16.2026 - LEYLAND - USPS 5.97 0.00

01.71.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 5.97 06.16.2026 - LEYLAND - USPS INV0016906 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.27.2026 - DONERY - INSALATA'S 97.02 0.00

01.11.61000 TRAINING 97.02 05.27.2026 - DONERY - INSALAT INV0016907 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.16.2026 - DONERY - PRETTI PLATTERS 58.15 0.00

01.11.61000 TRAINING 58.15 06.16.2026 - DONERY - PRETTI P INV0016908 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.16.2026 - DONERY - MARIN INDEPEND 36.43 0.00

01.12.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 36.43 06.16.2026 - DONERY - MARIN I INV0016909 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.26.2026 - WASKEY - ANDRONICO'S 9.99 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 9.99 05.26.2026 - WASKEY - ANDRO INV0016910 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.27.2026 - WASKEY - STEFANO'S PIZZA 7.51 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 7.51 05.27.2026 - WASKEY - STEFAN INV0016911 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.27.2026 - WASKEY - COMFORTS 3.75 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 3.75 05.27.2026 - WASKEY - COMFO INV0016912 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.28.2026 - WASKEY - WAYFINDER BOOK 62.10 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 62.10 05.28.2026 - WASKEY - WAYFIN INV0016913 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.29.2026 - WASKEY - ANDRONICO'S 11.73 0.00

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 11.73 05.29.2026 - WASKEY - ANDRO INV0016914 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.04.2026 - WASKEY - FEDEX OFFICE 111.52 0.00 100
Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 39 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number

01.71.61132 OUTSIDE SVCS-PROGRAM 111.52 06.04.2026 - WASKEY - FEDEX O INV0016915 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.26.2026 - SCOBLE - APA 450.00 0.00

01.18.61000 TRAINING 450.00 05.26.2026 - SCOBLE - APA
INV0016916 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.27.2026 - SCOBLE - OPEN AI 50.00 0.00

01.18.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 50.00 05.27.2026 - SCOBLE - OPEN AI INV0016917 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.02.2026 - SCOBLE - CLOUDWAYS 11.50 0.00

01.18.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 11.50 06.02.2026 - SCOBLE - CLOUDW INV0016918 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.03.2026 - SCOBLE - STATELINE BAG CO 1,541.75 0.00

90.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 1,541.75 06.03.2026 - SCOBLE - STATELIN INV0016919 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.09.2026 - SCOBLE - QUILL CORP 155.11 0.00

90.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 155.11 06.09.2026 - SCOBLE - QUILL CO INV0016920 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.27.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET 125.39 0.00

21.63.62987 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 125.39 05.27.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET INV0016921 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.27.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET 186.68 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 186.68 05.27.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET INV0016922 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.28.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET 363.20 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 363.20 05.28.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET INV0016923 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.28.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET 49.13 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 49.13 05.28.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET INV0016924 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.29.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET 27.30 0.00

21.63.62984 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 27.30 05.29.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET INV0016925 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.30.2026 - HILLARD - UNITED MARKETS 101.82 0.00

21.63.62987 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 101.82 05.30.2026 - HILLARD - UNITED INV0016926 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.03.2026 - HILLARD - MOUNTAIN MIKE' 369.56 0.00

21.63.62987 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 369.56 06.03.2026 - HILLARD - MOUNT INV0016927 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.03.2026 - HILLARD - SAFEWAY 24.96 0.00

21.63.61184 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 24.96 06.03.2026 - HILLARD - SAFEWA INV0016928 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.04.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET 188.84 0.00

21.63.62987 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 188.84 06.04.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET INV0016929 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.13.2026 - HILLARD - MOUNTAIN MIKE' 301.59 0.00

21.63.61184 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 301.59 06.13.2026 - HILLARD - MOUNT INV0016930 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.14.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET 178.86 0.00

21.63.62987 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 178.86 06.14.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET INV0016931 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.18.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET 145.43 0.00

21.63.62978 TODDLER ENRICHMENT S 145.43 06.18.2026 - HILLARD - TARGET INV0016932 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.19.2026 - HILLARD - CVS 7.80 0.00

21.63.61184 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 7.80 06.19.2026 - HILLARD - CVS INV0016933 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.19.2026 - HILLARD - SAFEWAY 74.20 0.00

21.63.61184 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 74.20 06.19.2026 - HILLARD - SAFEWA INV0016934 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.19.2026 - HILLARD - SEESAW CHILDRE 79.39 0.00

21.63.62978 TODDLER ENRICHMENT S 79.39 06.19.2026 - HILLARD - SEESAW INV0016935 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.23.2026 - LIN - OFFICE DEPOT 43.69 0.00

21.65.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 43.69 05.23.2026 - LIN - OFFICE DEPO INV0016936 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.28.2026 - LIN - SAFEWAY 36.80 0.00

21.64 SPECIAL EVENT EXPENSE 36.80 05.28.2026 - LIN - SAFEWAY INV0016937 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.29.2026 - LIN - WALMART 17.13 0.00

21.63.62980 AFTER SCHOOL ENRICHM 17.13 05.29.2026 - LIN - WALMART INV0016938 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.04.2026 - LIN - SAFEWAY 5.45 0.00

21.64 SPECIAL EVENT EXPENSE 5.45 06.04.2026 - LIN - SAFEWAY INV0016939 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.18.2026 - LIN - WALMART 57.94 0.00

21.65.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 57.94 06.18.2026 - LIN - WALMART INV0016940 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.20.2026 - LIN - GOOD START PACKAGIN 275.51 0.00 101
Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 40 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number

21.64 SPECIAL EVENT EXPENSE 275.51 06.20.2026 - LIN - GOOD START INV0016941 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.20.2026 - LIN - WALMART 12.87 0.00

21.64 SPECIAL EVENT EXPENSE 12.87 06.20.2026 - LIN - WALMART INV0016942 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.29.2026 - O'GRADY - COMCAST 102.49 0.00

21.63.61187 ROBSON AFTER SCHOOL 102.49 05.29.2026 - O'GRADY - COMCA INV0016943 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.01.2026 - O'GRADY - MARIN INDEPEN 5.95 0.00

21.65.61302 DUES 5.95 06.01.2026 - O'GRADY - MARIN
INV0016944 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.09.2026 - O'GRADY - ESIGNS 173.66 0.00

21.61.61164 SOCCER SERVICES -300.00 (CR) 06.02.2026 - O'GRADY - CN

21.64 SPECIAL EVENT EXPENSE 473.66 06.09.2026 - O'GRADY - ESIGNS INV0016945 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.04.2026 - O'GRADY - MOUNTAIN MIKE' 113.93 0.00

21.63.61179 PARKSIDE SERVICES 113.93 06.04.2026 - O'GRADY - MOUNT INV0016946 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.11.2026 - O'GRADY - ESIGNS 247.54 0.00

21.64 SPECIAL EVENT EXPENSE 247.54 06.11.2026 - O'GRADY - ESIGNS INV0016947 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.11.2026 - O'GRADY - ESIGNS 459.98 0.00

21.64 SPECIAL EVENT EXPENSE 459.98 06.11.2026 - O'GRADY - ESIGNS INV0016948 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.11.2026 - O'GRADY - ESIGNS 169.20 0.00

21.64 SPECIAL EVENT EXPENSE 169.20 06.11.2026 - O'GRADY - ESIGNS INV0016949 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.18.2026 - ENGINEERS - MARIN COUNT 52.50 0.00

01.41.61300 PUBLICATIONS 52.50 06.18.2026 - ENGINEERS - MARI INV0016950 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.08.2026 - ROBBE - CA BUILDING OFFICI 115.00 0.00

01.19.61000 TRAINING 115.00 06.08.2026 - ROBBE - CA BUILDI INV0016951 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.28.2026 - MIHAN - SAFEWAY 61.09 0.00

01.82.62206 Snack Shack 61.09 05.28.2026 - MIHAN - SAFEWAY INV0016952 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.29.2026 - MIHAN - SAFEWAY 76.37 0.00

01.82.62206 Snack Shack 76.37 05.29.2026 - MIHAN - SAFEWAY INV0016953 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.31.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON 16.38 0.00

21.65.62000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.38 05.31.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON INV0016954 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.31.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON 91.72 0.00

21.61.61160 BASEBALL EXPENSES 91.72 05.31.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON INV0016955 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.01.2026 - MIHAN - RED HILL HOLIDAY 30.90 0.00

21.61.62964 SOCCER SUPPLIES 30.90 06.01.2026 - MIHAN - RED HILL INV0016956 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.03.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON 25.11 0.00

21.65.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 25.11 06.03.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON INV0016957 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.06.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON 32.76 0.00

21.61.62964 SOCCER SUPPLIES 32.76 06.06.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON INV0016958 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.08.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON 91.52 0.00

21.61.61160 BASEBALL EXPENSES 91.52 06.08.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON INV0016959 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.11.2026 - MIHAN - HOME DEPOT 65.46 0.00

21.65.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 65.46 06.11.2026 - MIHAN - HOME DE INV0016960 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.18.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON 41.50 0.00

21.61.62965 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES 41.50 06.18.2026 - MIHAN - AMAZON INV0016961 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.26.2026 - JONES - HB KIDS 425.00 0.00

21.63.61184 CAMP KIDMARIN MIGHT 212.50 05.26.2026 - JONES - HB KIDS

21.63.61207 CAMP KIDMARIN MINI SE 212.50 05.26.2026 - JONES - HB KIDS INV0016962 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.26.2026 - JONES - GOOD EARTH 24.62 0.00

21.65.61000 TRAINING 24.62 05.26.2026 - JONES - GOOD EAR INV0016963 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.07.2026 - JONES - DOLLAR TREE 30.42 0.00

21.63.61179 PARKSIDE SERVICES 30.42 06.07.2026 - JONES - DOLLAR T INV0016964 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.07.2026 - JONES - DOLLAR TREE 13.66 0.00

21.63.61179 PARKSIDE SERVICES 13.66 06.07.2026 - JONES - DOLLAR T INV0016965 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.08.2026 - JONES - CVS 114.75 0.00 102
Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 41 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number

21.63.61179 PARKSIDE SERVICES 114.75 06.08.2026 - JONES - CVS INV0016966 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.12.2026 - JONES - DOLLAR TREE 15.94 0.00

21.63.61179 PARKSIDE SERVICES 15.94 06.12.2026 - JONES - DOLLAR T INV0016967 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.21.2026 - CLIFFORD - COMFORTS 130.00 0.00

01.21.61000 TRAINING 130.00 05.21.2026 - CLIFFORD - COMF INV0016968 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.22.2026 - CLIFFORD - TEAMSCREEN 28.61 0.00

01.19.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 28.61 05.22.2026 - CLIFFORD - TEAMS INV0016969 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.29.2026 - CLIFFORD - QUICKBOOKS 75.00 0.00

01.12.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 75.00 05.29.2026 - CLIFFORD - QUICK INV0016970 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.03.2026 - CLIFFORD - APPLE 0.99 0.00

01.19.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 0.99 06.03.2026 - CLIFFORD - APPLE INV0016971 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.06.2026 - CLIFFORD - ADOBE 911.74 0.00

42.21.63003 COMPUTER HARDWARE/ 911.74 06.06.2026 - CLIFFORD - ADOBE INV0016972 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.18.2026 - CLIFFORD - SAFEWAY 49.53 0.00

01.21.61000 TRAINING 49.53 06.18.2026 - CLIFFORD - SAFEW INV0016973 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.18.2026 - CLIFFORD - COMFORTS 1,166.40 0.00

01.21.61000 TRAINING 1,166.40 06.18.2026 - CLIFFORD - COMF INV0016974 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.28.2026 - SHAW - BLINDS.COM 262.77 0.00

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 262.77 05.28.2026 - SHAW - BLINDS.CO INV0016975 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.05.2026 - HEALY - MIGHTY MEN SERVI 1,650.00 0.00

41.41.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 1,650.00 06.05.2026 - HEALY - MIGHTY M INV0016976 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.18.2026 - HEALY - VIOC 163.53 0.00

01.41.61602 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/ 163.53 06.18.2026 - HEALY - VIOC INV0016977 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.22.2026 - AVILA - CREEKSIDE PIZZA 513.17 0.00

01.21.61000 TRAINING 513.17 05.22.2026 - AVILA - CREEKSIDE INV0016978 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.25.2026 - AVILA - NICK THE GREEK 151.20 0.00

01.11.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 151.20 05.25.2026 - AVILA - NICK THE G INV0016979 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.26.2026 - AVILA - SAFEWAY 13.98 0.00

01.11.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 13.98 05.26.2026 - AVILA - SAFEWAY INV0016980 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.29.2026 - AVILA - S&H CLEANERS 30.00 0.00

01.71.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 30.00 05.29.2026 - AVILA - S&H CLEAN INV0016981 Invoice 06/22/2026 05.30.2026 - AVILA - STEPHANIE MOHAN 1,243.00 0.00

01.11.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 1,243.00 05.30.2026 - AVILA - STEPHANIE INV0016982 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.02.2026 - AVILA - NAYAX VENDING 10.00 0.00

01.12.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 10.00 06.02.2026 - AVILA - NAYAX VEN INV0016983 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.02.2026 - AVILA - LEAGUE OF CALIFOR 675.00 0.00

01.12.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 675.00 06.02.2026 - AVILA - LEAGUE OF INV0016984 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.09.2026 - AVILA - SAFEWAY 25.95 0.00

01.11.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 25.95 06.09.2026 - AVILA - SAFEWAY INV0016985 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.09.2026 - AVILA - MI PUEBLO TAQUERI 176.07 0.00

01.11.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 176.07 06.09.2026 - AVILA - MI PUEBLO INV0016986 Invoice 06/22/2026 06.16.2026 - AVILA - SCOUT RETAIL GROU 96.14 0.00

01.11.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 96.14 06.16.2026 - AVILA - SCOUT RET 00362 Town of San Anselmo 07/21/2026 DFT07144 Bank Draft 0.00 317,115.19 103
Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 42 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV0017019 Invoice 07/21/2026 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll 317,115.19 0.00

01.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 207,529.95 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

01.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 3,521.95 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

01.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 374.68 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

01.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE -964.07 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

13.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 744.74 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

13.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE -1.42 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

15.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 6,604.12 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

19.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 14,134.09 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

21.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 71,886.43 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

27.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 8,074.05 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

31.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 233.76 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

34.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 233.76 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

41.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 233.76 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

42.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 639.37 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

60.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 1,722.40 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll

95.00.20299 PAYROLL PAYABLE 2,147.62 7-31-2026 TSA To Fund Payroll 03303 U.S. Bank Corporate Trust 07/24/2026 DFT07165 Bank Draft 0.00 633,976.09 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 3260242 Invoice 07/01/2026 Pension ObligaƟon Bonds 2021 Debt Srvc 633,976.09 0.00

01.40.64000 DEBT SERVICE: PRINCIPAL 550,000.00 Pension ObligaƟon Bonds 2021

01.40.64100 DEBT SERVICE: INTEREST 83,976.09 Pension ObligaƟon Bonds 2021 00089 Employment Development Department 07/24/2026 DFT07166 Bank Draft 0.00 250.90 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount L0251547952 Invoice 06/30/2026 Reimb Benefit Charges Cicchetti 250.90 0.00

40.21.61908 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT I 250.90 Reimb Benefit Charges Cicchetti 00181 Ross Valley Fire Department 07/15/2026 DFT07167 Bank Draft 0.00 540,711.50 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount RVFD-MC-2026-0 Invoice 07/15/2026 Member Contribution July 2026 540,711.50 0.00

01.32.61139 RVFS CONTRACT 516,450.42 Member Contribution July 2026

15.32.61150 OUTSIDE SERVICES-OTHE 24,261.08 Member Contribution July 2026 01102 Central Marin Police Authority 07/07/2026 DFT07168 Bank Draft 0.00 1,534,560.25 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount CMPA-MC-2026- Invoice 07/07/2026 Member Contribution July 2026 1,534,560.25 0.00

01.30.61199 POLICE SERVICES CONTR 1,510,817.75 Member Contribution July 2026

13.30.61199 POLICE SERVICES CONTR 23,742.50 Member Contribution July 2026 04006 Kyocera Document Solutions Northern Californ 07/29/2026 DFT07169 Bank Draft 0.00 1,502.19 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 55E1D00947 Invoice 07/17/2026 Printer Lease July 2026 1,502.19 0.00

42.21.62200 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIE 1,502.19 Printer Lease July 2026 00348 The Bank of New York Mellon 07/28/2026 DFT07170 Bank Draft 0.00 191,400.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount CTU2005068-202 Invoice 07/01/2026 07.01.2026 2020 General ObligaƟon Refu 191,400.00 0.00

28.40.64000 DEBT SERVICE: PRINCIPAL 180,000.00 07.01.2026 2020 General Obliga

28.40.64100 DEBT SERVICE: INTEREST 11,400.00 07.01.2026 2020 General Obliga 03344 CSG Forte Payments Inc. 07/10/2026 DFT07171 Bank Draft 0.00 1,074.28 104
Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 43 of 44
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 0015946283 Invoice 06/30/2026 REC-Credit Card Processing - June 2026 1,074.28 0.00

21.65.61177 PROCESSING FEES 1,074.28 REC-Credit Card Processing - Jun 03344 CSG Forte Payments Inc. 07/10/2026 DFT07172 Bank Draft 0.00 3,187.03 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 0015946282 Invoice 06/30/2026 REC-Credit Card Processing- June 2026 3,187.03 0.00

21.65.61177 PROCESSING FEES 3,187.03 REC-Credit Card Processing- Jun 04144 CPS Holdco, Inc 07/31/2026 DFT07176 Bank Draft 0.00 105.00 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount JUL26-TSA Invoice 07/31/2026 FSA Fee - July 2026 105.00 0.00

01.12.61107 OUTSIDE SVCS-ACCOUNTI 105.00 FSA Fee - July 2026 00128 Pacific Gas & Electric 07/27/2026 DFT07179 Bank Draft 0.00 15,476.91 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 461-07212026 Invoice 07/21/2026 461 - Town Hall UƟliƟes - 06.15.2026-07.1 15,476.91 0.00

21.65.61701 UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY 465.85 461 - Town Hall UƟliƟes - 06.15.

21.65.61701 UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY 724.32 461 - Town Hall UƟliƟes - 06.15.

31.41.61701 UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY 1,286.13 461 - Town Hall UƟliƟes - 06.15.

31.41.61702 UTILITIES-GAS 814.09 461 - Town Hall UƟliƟes - 06.15.

34.41.61701 UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY 290.97 461 - Town Hall UƟliƟes - 06.15.

34.41.61702 UTILITIES-GAS 185.72 461 - Town Hall UƟliƟes - 06.15.

41.41.61701 UTILITIES 11,709.83 461 - Town Hall UƟliƟes - 06.15.

Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
Payment Type Count
Bank Code AP Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
256
0 15
24 0

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 295 0.00
Payment
1,603,209.89

0.00 -18,322.42
3,927,151.57

0.00 5,512,039.04
Payable
Count
479
0 0
104
0 583
105
Check Report Date Range: 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026
8/18/2026 6:50:48 AM Page 44 of 44
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
256
0 15
24 0

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 295 0.00
1,603,209.89

0.00 -18,322.42
3,927,151.57

0.00 5,512,039.04
479
0 0
104
0 583
Fund Name Amount Period
Fund Summary
99 POOLED CASH - OPERATING 5,512,039.04 7/2026
5,512,039.04
106
Item #: 1.5

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item #1.5
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Revenue and Expenditure Reports, July 2026 FROM: Jeff Zuba, Finance & Admin Services Director
RECOMMENDATION: That Town Council consider approving the monthly year-todate Revenue and Expenditure Reports and corresponding activity for the period ending through July 31, 2026.

SUMMARY
Every reporting period end, the Town of San Anselmo presents to the Town Council its operations as shown on the Revenue and Expenditure reports for discussion and approval.

BACKGROUND
The Revenue and Expenditure reports are year-to-date summaries of revenues and expenditures from the Town’s financial system (Tyler Incode) for both the current as well as the prior corresponding fiscal year. These reports include the General Fund’s operations given that most of the Town-level operational activities are processed through the General Fund either directly or indirectly. The Town Council approves these reports monthly throughout the fiscal year.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The revenue and expenditure data through July 31, 2026, is a compilation of all operating activity that is year-to-date for the current and prior fiscal year. These reports are sourced directly from the Town’s financial system, of which a corresponding analysis has been carried out by identifying the key trends the Town Council should take note of.
107
Item #: 1.5
Revenues
Overall, through the July 2026 reporting period, the Town’s general fund revenue increased its base relative to the prior year by $0.040M. A majority of the Town’s revenue is collected at specific times.

As shown above, the Town’s overall revenue base increased by $0.040M due to the following:
 The Town receives property tax disbursements from the County of Marin in December (55%), April (40%), and June (5%).
 The Town receives disbursements monthly from the State for Sales Tax. The collections for the fiscal year 2026-27 will begin in September.  Revenue from Licenses & Permits increased by $0.041M compared to the previous period, due to construction permit activity in the Town and collection of business license tax.

As far as the other revenue streams, these changes either decreased or remained flat year-over-year resulting in an immaterial change.

Expenditures
Overall, through the July 2026 reporting period, the Town’s General Fund expenditures have increased by $0.264M compared to the prior year. This is primarily from increases in compensation, retirement, outside services, and debt service. All other activity is either flat year-over-year or nets to an immaterial change, all of which are within management’s expectations.

Category JUL YTD FY27 JUL YTD FY26 $ Change % Change
Property Tax - 687.43 (687.43) -100.00%
Sales Tax - - - -
Property Transfer Tax - - - -
Franchise Taxes - - - -
Licenses & Permits 132,351.14 90,801.21 41,549.93 45.76% Fines 1,321.62 204.75 1,116.87 545.48%
Cash & Investment Interest - - - -
Intergovernmental - - - -
Other Fees 48,979.26 51,338.78 (2,359.52) -4.60%
Transfers In - - - -
Total 182,652.02 143,032.17 39,619.85 27.70%
108
Item #: 1.5
As shown above, the Town’s expenditures base overall increased by $0.264M, which is driven by compensation, retirement, outside services – public safety, and debt service:
 Compensation (Salaries & Wages and Benefits) increased by $0.019M compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to the 5.5% cost of living adjustment effective July 1, 2026 and step adjustments.  Retirement increased by $0.077M compared to the prior period due to the Town’s CalPERS unfunded liability payment, cost of living, and step adjustments.  Outside Services decreased by $0.072M compared to the previous period due to the FY25-26 feasibility study for Memorial Park, and timing of payments to organizations such as Transportation Authority of Marin and Association of Bay Area Government.
 Outside Services – Public Safety increased by $0.059M compared to the previous fiscal year due to payments for Public Safety JPA’s, Central Marin Police Authority, and Ross Valley Fire Department. These increases are in line with the budgeted amounts set by the Police Council and Fire Board.  Debt Service increased by $0.037M compared to the previous fiscal year due to the repayment of the 2021 Pension Obligation Bonds. The bond payments are due in August and February.
 Internal Service Fund Charge increased by $0.141M compared to the previous period due payment to the Internal Service Funds for Insurance and slight increases to charges for building maintenance and information technology.

As far as the other expenditure streams, these changes either slightly changed or remained flat year-over-year, resulting in an immaterial change. All other changes are immaterial for further discussion and are expected given the Town’s operations.

MEASURE J
Revenues
Overall, through the July 2026 reporting period, the Town’s Measure J Fund’s revenue remained flat relative to the prior year since its early in the fiscal year.

Category JUL YTD FY27 JUL YTD FY26 $ Change % Change
Compensation 440,471.33 420,942.21 19,529.12 4.64%
Retirement 307,172.17 229,744.71 77,427.46 33.70%
Training 50.00 1,281.55 (1,231.55) -96.10%
Outside Services 255,034.00 327,897.11 (72,863.11) -22.22% Outside Services - Public Safety 2,027,268.17 1,968,246.25 59,021.92 3.00% Maintenance 6,442.73 8,800.51 (2,357.78) -26.79%
Utilities 3,513.69 1,246.06 2,267.63 181.98%
Supplies 7,149.84 6,044.30 1,105.54 18.29%
Debt Service - Pension Bond 633,976.09 596,120.07 37,856.02 6.35% Other Expenditure 12,316.43 11,102.01 1,214.42 10.94%
Internal Service Charge 892,184.02 750,591.16 141,592.86 18.86% Transfers Out - - - 0.00%
Total 4,585,578.47 4,322,015.94 263,562.53 6.10%
109
Item #: 1.5
 The Town receives disbursements monthly from the State for Sales Tax. The collections for the fiscal year 2026-27 will begin in September.

Expenditures
Overall, through the July 2026 reporting period end, the Town’s Measure J expenditures have decreased by $0.038M compared to the prior year. This is primarily from increases in compensation, outside services, and construction. All other activity is either flat yearover-year or nets correspondingly to an immaterial change.  Compensation (Salaries & Wages and Benefits) decreased by $0.001M compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to the 5.5% cost of living adjustment effective July 1, 2026 and step adjustments.  Outside Services increased by $0.007M compared to the prior period due to Ross Valley Fire Department staffing costs, including a 3.5% COLA, 3% equity adjustment, and continued step increases for Firefighter/Paramedic personnel.  Construction decreased by $0.037M compared to the previous period due to the Fire Station 20 Project and Adaptive Traffic Signal Project.

FISCAL IMPACT
None

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Not applicable
Category JUL YTD FY27 JUL YTD FY26 $ Change % Change
Sales Tax - - - -
Cash & Investment Interest - - - -
Reimbursement - - - -
Total - - - -
Category JUL YTD FY27 JUL YTD FY26 $ Change % Change
Compensation 18,287.39 19,558.94 (1,271.55) -6.50%
Retirement 1,275.93 1,550.42 (274.49) -17.70%
Training - - - -
Outside Services 24,261.08 23,554.42 706.66 3.00%
Construction 127,024.55 163,905.10 (36,880.55) -22.50%
Transfers Out - - - -
Total 170,848.95 208,568.88 (37,719.93) -18.09%
110
Item #: 1.5

CEQA AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Council’s discussion and approval of this report is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act, because it does not involve an activity which has the potential to cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21065).

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment #1: Budget Comparison Report by Subcategory, July 2026 Attachment #2: Budget Comparison Report by Department, July 2026 Attachment #3: Budget Comparison Report by Subcategory Measure J, July 2026 Attachment #4: Budget Comparison Report by Department Measure J, July 2026 111
Town of San Anselmo
2026-2027 Rev & Exp Report
as of 07/31/2026
2025-2026
Revised
Budget
2025-2026
Audited
Actuals
2025-2026
YTD Actuals
% of
Audited
Actuals
2026-2027
Adopted
Budget
2026-2027
Revised
Budget
2026-2027
YTD Actuals
% of
Actual /
Budget
Fund: 01 - GENERAL FUND
Revenue
400 - PROPERTY TAX GENERAL 10,487,401.00 10,440,497.01 421.95 0.00% 10,931,643.00 10,931,643.00 0.00 0.00% 401 - PENSION 3,222,000.00 3,313,425.34 265.48 0.01% 3,289,650.00 3,289,650.00 0.00 0.00% 402 - PROPERTY TAX OTHER 4,109,847.00 3,989,994.53 0.00 0.00% 4,246,865.00 4,246,865.00 0.00 0.00% 410 - OTHER TAXES 1,471,120.00 1,393,590.33 0.00 0.00% 1,518,580.00 1,518,580.00 0.00 0.00% 411 - FRANCHISE TAXES 976,000.00 953,870.07 0.00 0.00% 1,052,147.00 1,052,147.00 0.00 0.00% 420 - BUSINESS LICENSE 298,000.00 300,064.34 1,403.94 0.47% 298,000.00 298,000.00 1,704.40 0.57% 421 - PARKING 15,000.00 22,980.91 1,863.63 8.11% 20,000.00 20,000.00 1,118.96 5.59% 422 - CONSTRUCTION 1,230,000.00 1,404,267.60 87,533.64 6.23% 1,270,000.00 1,270,000.00 129,527.78 10.20% 430 - VEHICLE CODE 0.00 9,108.03 0.00 0.00% 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00% 431 - LIBRARY 2,500.00 2,466.15 204.75 8.30% 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00% 432 - PARKING 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 1,321.62 0.00% 440 - USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY 185,000.00 122,915.16 0.00 0.00% 150,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00% 450 - STATE REVENUE 171,000.00 154,725.34 0.00 0.00% 173,125.00 173,125.00 0.00 0.00% 460 - FEDERAL REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 470 - LOCAL AGENCY REVENUE 0.00 23,341.03 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 480 - FEES FOR SERVICES 215,500.00 253,524.77 15,883.40 6.27% 172,000.00 172,000.00 12,596.88 7.32% 490 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 257,500.00 353,692.55 35,455.38 10.02% 280,910.00 280,910.00 36,382.38 12.95% 519 - TRANSFERS IN 413,185.00 398,211.68 0.00 0.00% 415,658.00 415,658.00 0.00 0.00% 520 - SOURCE OF PROCEEDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Total Revenue: 23,064,053.00 23,136,674.84 143,032.17 0.62% 23,831,078.00 23,831,078.00 182,652.02 0.77% Expense
600 - SALARIES AND WAGES 4,025,158.20 3,932,026.34 335,317.57 8.53% 4,138,576.00 4,138,576.00 350,415.31 8.47% 601 - RETIREMENT 570,412.97 579,530.10 229,744.71 39.64% 668,005.00 668,005.00 307,172.17 45.98% 602 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 960,854.70 933,637.22 78,457.02 8.40% 1,046,826.00 1,046,826.00 83,012.13 7.93% 604 - RETIREE BENEFITS 190,028.00 190,028.00 7,167.62 3.77% 207,263.00 207,263.00 7,043.89 3.40% 610 - TRAINING 69,750.00 45,323.34 1,281.55 2.83% 63,000.00 63,000.00 50.00 0.08% 611 - OUTSIDE SERVICES 2,507,045.00 2,329,079.50 327,897.11 14.08% 1,983,435.00 1,983,435.00 255,034.00 12.86% 612 - OUTSIDE SERVICES - POLICE (CMPA) & FIRE (RVFD) 11,732,115.00 11,731,281.63 1,968,246.25 16.78% 12,250,138.00 12,250,138.00 2,027,268.17 16.55% 613 - PUBLICATION / DUES 28,645.00 17,359.71 3,404.91 19.61% 25,647.00 25,647.00 2,348.00 9.16% 614 - MAINTENANCE 104,250.00 89,025.29 4,480.60 5.03% 134,250.00 134,250.00 4,094.73 3.05% 615 - BUILDING MAINTENANCE 242,500.00 177,346.40 915.00 0.52% 42,500.00 42,500.00 0.00 0.00% 616 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 16,050.00 24,814.71 1,246.06 5.02% 28,550.00 28,550.00 3,513.69 12.31% 617 - UTILITIES 0.00 54,474.28 186.00 0.34% 0.00 0.00 633.10 0.00% 618 - HIRING 0.00 1,790.54 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 619 - MISCELLANEOUS 15,500.00 1,672.50 0.00 0.00% 15,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 0.00% 620 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,800.00 14,253.39 524.15 3.68% 0.00 0.00 293.69 0.00% 622 - DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES 134,450.00 140,790.31 5,520.15 3.92% 140,800.00 140,800.00 6,856.15 4.87% 623 - BOOKS / MAGAZINES / VIDEOS 30,750.00 27,622.91 1,211.69 4.39% 31,980.00 31,980.00 2,834.30 8.86% 628 - Internal Service Charge 1,307,094.00 1,307,093.92 750,591.16 57.42% 1,521,208.00 1,521,208.00 892,184.02 58.65% 629 - MISCELLANEOUS 183,800.00 141,821.94 9,704.32 6.84% 179,382.00 179,382.00 8,849.03 4.93% 630 - EQUIPMENT 0.00 7,830.67 0.00 0.00% 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.00% 631 - CAPITAL OUTLAY - CONSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 640 - PRINCIPAL 510,000.00 510,000.00 510,000.00 100.00% 550,000.00 550,000.00 550,000.00 100.00% 641 - INTEREST 170,189.00 170,096.16 86,120.07 50.63% 165,018.00 165,018.00 83,976.09 50.89% 670 - TRANSFERS OUT 1,380,000.00 1,380,000.00 0.00 0.00% 639,000.00 639,000.00 0.00 0.00% Total Expense: 24,180,391.87 23,806,898.86 4,322,015.94 18.15% 23,831,078.00 23,831,078.00 4,585,578.47 19.24% Total Fund: 01 - GENERAL FUND: -1,116,338.87 -670,224.02 -4,178,983.77 0.00 0.00 -4,402,926.45 Report Total: -1,116,338.87 -670,224.02 -4,178,983.77 0.00 0.00 -4,402,926.45 112
Town of San Anselmo
2026-2027 Rev & Exp Report
as of 07/31/2026
2025-2026
Revised
Budget
2025-2026
Audited
Actuals
2025-2026
YTD Actuals
% of
Audited
Actuals
2026-2027
Adopted
Budget
2026-2027
Revised
Budget
2026-2027
YTD Actuals
% of
Actual /
Budget
Fund: 01 - GENERAL FUND
Expense
00 - UNDESIGNATED 1,380,000.00 1,380,000.00 0.00 0.00% 639,000.00 639,000.00 0.00 0.00% 11 - TOWN COUNCIL 64,260.00 45,651.48 2,648.06 5.80% 90,604.00 90,604.00 2,171.83 2.40% 12 - ADMINISTRATION 1,748,945.87 1,741,917.51 148,365.60 8.52% 1,862,469.00 1,862,469.00 151,148.73 8.12% 16 - LEGAL SERVICES 280,000.00 223,302.75 0.00 0.00% 250,000.00 250,000.00 0.00 0.00% 18 - PLANNING 1,226,409.00 1,094,118.79 61,517.50 5.62% 727,078.00 727,078.00 54,550.15 7.50% 19 - Building & Inspections 1,198,550.00 1,139,465.24 80,331.55 7.05% 1,126,992.00 1,126,992.00 77,804.54 6.90% 21 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL 1,544,217.00 1,504,703.50 1,068,704.06 71.02% 1,771,513.00 1,771,513.00 1,244,846.23 70.27% 30 - POLICE 5,814,695.00 5,814,694.94 1,476,559.75 25.39% 6,043,271.00 6,043,271.00 1,510,817.75 25.00% 32 - ROSS VALLEY FIRE SERVICE 5,959,920.00 5,969,951.54 491,686.50 8.24% 6,249,367.00 6,249,367.00 516,450.42 8.26% 40 - DEBT SERVICE 681,689.00 681,696.16 596,120.07 87.45% 716,618.00 716,618.00 633,976.09 88.47% 41 - ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION 674,990.00 738,176.83 53,735.30 7.28% 759,030.00 759,030.00 49,860.74 6.57% 42 - STREETS 1,317,252.00 1,297,955.22 105,572.29 8.13% 1,423,225.00 1,423,225.00 92,516.15 6.50% 71 - LIBRARY 1,165,164.00 1,082,196.03 154,970.73 14.32% 1,012,672.00 1,012,672.00 169,591.21 16.75% 81 - PARKS 759,419.00 756,392.84 55,448.83 7.33% 822,541.00 822,541.00 54,926.27 6.68% 82 - RECREATION/GENERAL FUND 364,881.00 336,676.03 26,355.70 7.83% 336,698.00 336,698.00 26,918.36 7.99% Total Expense: 24,180,391.87 23,806,898.86 4,322,015.94 18.15% 23,831,078.00 23,831,078.00 4,585,578.47 19.24% Total Fund: 01 - GENERAL FUND: 24,180,391.87 23,806,898.86 4,322,015.94 18.15% 23,831,078.00 23,831,078.00 4,585,578.47 19.24% Report Total: 24,180,391.87 23,806,898.86 4,322,015.94 18.15% 23,831,078.00 23,831,078.00 4,585,578.47 19.24% 113
Town of San Anselmo
2026-2027 Rev & Exp Report
as of 07/31/2026
2025-2026
Revised
Budget
2025-2026
Audited
Actuals
2025-2026
YTD Actuals
% of
Audited
Actuals
2026-2027
Adopted
Budget
2026-2027
Revised
Budget
2026-2027
YTD Actuals
% of
Actual /
Budget
Fund: 15 - SALES TAX - MEASURE J
Revenue
410 - OTHER TAXES 2,493,023.00 2,343,079.97 0.00 0.00% 2,588,768.00 2,588,768.00 0.00 0.00% 440 - USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00% 470 - LOCAL AGENCY REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 490 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 363,005.00 2,390.87 0.00 0.00% 400,000.00 400,000.00 0.00 0.00% Total Revenue: 2,876,028.00 2,345,470.84 0.00 0.00% 3,013,768.00 3,013,768.00 0.00 0.00% Expense
600 - SALARIES AND WAGES 199,152.00 200,508.69 16,184.63 8.07% 218,294.00 218,294.00 14,576.46 6.68% 601 - RETIREMENT 18,606.00 18,763.78 1,550.42 8.26% 20,645.00 20,645.00 1,275.93 6.18% 602 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 42,201.03 42,520.72 3,374.31 7.94% 49,222.00 49,222.00 3,710.93 7.54% 611 - OUTSIDE SERVICES 332,653.00 300,990.91 23,554.42 7.83% 1,365,733.00 1,365,733.00 24,261.08 1.78% 631 - CAPITAL OUTLAY - CONSTRUCTION 2,895,912.00 2,914,126.53 163,905.10 5.62% 846,600.00 846,600.00 127,024.55 15.00% 632 - SLURRY 0.00 267.25 0.00 0.00% 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00% 670 - TRANSFERS OUT 124,651.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 129,438.00 129,438.00 0.00 0.00% Total Expense: 3,613,175.03 3,477,177.88 208,568.88 6.00% 2,729,932.00 2,729,932.00 170,848.95 6.26% Total Fund: 15 - SALES TAX - MEASURE J: -737,147.03 -1,131,707.04 -208,568.88 283,836.00 283,836.00 -170,848.95 Report Total: -737,147.03 -1,131,707.04 -208,568.88 283,836.00 283,836.00 -170,848.95 114
Town of San Anselmo
2026-2027 Rev & Exp Report
as of 07/31/2026
2025-2026
Revised
Budget
2025-2026
Audited
Actuals
2025-2026
YTD Actuals
% of
Audited
Actuals
2026-2027
Adopted
Budget
2026-2027
Revised
Budget
2026-2027
YTD Actuals
% of
Actual /
Budget
Fund: 15 - SALES TAX - MEASURE J
Expense
00 - UNDESIGNATED 124,651.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 129,438.00 129,438.00 0.00 0.00% 32 - ROSS VALLEY FIRE SERVICE 1,932,653.00 1,912,432.60 90,005.29 4.71% 366,133.00 366,133.00 24,261.08 6.63% 41 - ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION 1,399,871.03 1,098,009.14 97,470.01 8.88% 1,288,761.00 1,288,761.00 24,813.32 1.93% 71 - LIBRARY 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 81 - PARKS 0.00 9,655.63 0.00 0.00% 945,600.00 945,600.00 0.00 0.00% 90 - Climate Action 56,000.00 357,080.51 21,093.58 5.91% 0.00 0.00 121,774.55 0.00% Total Expense: 3,613,175.03 3,477,177.88 208,568.88 6.00% 2,729,932.00 2,729,932.00 170,848.95 6.26% Total Fund: 15 - SALES TAX - MEASURE J: 3,613,175.03 3,477,177.88 208,568.88 6.00% 2,729,932.00 2,729,932.00 170,848.95 6.26% Report Total: 3,613,175.03 3,477,177.88 208,568.88 6.00% 2,729,932.00 2,729,932.00 170,848.95 6.26% 115
Item 1.6

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item 1.6
MEETING DATE: 8/25/26
AGENDA TITLE: Financial Report on Recreation Fund
FROM: Mattie O’Grady – Director of Community Services
RECOMMENDATION: That the Town Council review the Recreation Fund revenue and expenditure report for the period ending July 31, 2026.

BACKGROUND
The Recreation Department offers a wide variety of fee-based programs throughout the fiscal year including sports programs and leagues, youth and adult classes, and childcare and camps. Additional revenue is generated through facility rentals and administrative fees.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
As of July 31, 2026, 8% of the fiscal year has elapsed and the Recreation Fund is listed at 9% of projected revenues and 8% of projected expenditures.

You will also find attached the capital outlay budget for the department, in addition to the Recreation Fund revenue and expenditure report.

For future historical comparison purposes, staff has developed the following table:

Attachment 1 – Revenue & Expenditure Report FY 2026-27: Recreation Fund as of 7/31/2026
Attachment 2 – Capital Outlay Report FY 2026-27 as of 7/31/2026 FY Revenue Expenditures Rev Over/(Under) Exp
Budget Actual % Budget Actual % $$ %
2026-27 2,608,050 241,629 9% 2,608,050 230,220 8% 11,408 0.4% 2025-26 2,362,320 214,434 9% 2,362,320 203,883 8% 10,551 0.4% 2024-25 2,210,355 247,779 11% 2,210,355 139,269 6% 108,510 5% 116
8/10/2026 5:33:02 PM Page 1 of 2
Budget Report
Town of San Anselmo Group Summary
For Fiscal: 2026-2027 Period Ending: 07/31/2026
Fiscal
AcƟvity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
SubCategory AcƟvity
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Remaining
Department: 00 - UNDESIGNATED
670 - TRANSFERS OUT 46,835.00 46,835.00 46,835.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 Department: 00 - UNDESIGNATED Total: 46,835.00 46,835.00 46,835.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% Department: 61 - SPORTS
480 - FEES FOR SERVICES 723,200.00 723,200.00 -715,085.76 98.88% 8,114.24 8,114.24 600 - SALARIES AND WAGES 30,000.00 30,000.00 29,325.00 97.75% 675.00 675.00 602 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,295.00 2,295.00 2,243.36 97.75% 51.64 51.64 611 - OUTSIDE SERVICES 318,982.00 318,982.00 318,982.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 629 - MISCELLANEOUS 59,090.00 59,090.00 50,762.26 85.91% 8,327.74 8,327.74 Department: 61 - SPORTS Surplus (Deficit): 312,833.00 312,833.00 -313,773.14 -940.14 -940.14 100.30% Department: 62 - CULTURE
480 - FEES FOR SERVICES 171,500.00 171,500.00 -171,304.00 99.89% 196.00 196.00 611 - OUTSIDE SERVICES 117,600.00 117,600.00 117,600.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 629 - MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 Department: 62 - CULTURE Surplus (Deficit): 52,900.00 52,900.00 -52,704.00 196.00 196.00 99.63% Department: 63 - CHILD CARE
480 - FEES FOR SERVICES 1,665,450.00 1,665,450.00 -1,438,734.20 86.39% 226,715.80 226,715.80 600 - SALARIES AND WAGES 800,136.00 800,136.00 708,869.96 88.59% 91,266.04 91,266.04 601 - RETIREMENT 42,492.00 42,492.00 39,834.88 93.75% 2,657.12 2,657.12 602 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 184,409.00 184,409.00 170,478.80 92.45% 13,930.20 13,930.20 611 - OUTSIDE SERVICES 356,050.00 356,050.00 303,169.48 85.15% 52,880.52 52,880.52 622 - DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES 7,000.00 7,000.00 5,746.05 82.09% 1,253.95 1,253.95 629 - MISCELLANEOUS 50,050.00 50,050.00 44,219.25 88.35% 5,830.75 5,830.75 Department: 63 - CHILD CARE Surplus (Deficit): 225,313.00 225,313.00 -166,415.78 58,897.22 58,897.22 73.86% Department: 64 - EVENTS AND OTHER
480 - FEES FOR SERVICES 30,000.00 30,000.00 -24,551.00 81.84% 5,449.00 5,449.00 611 - OUTSIDE SERVICES 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 Department: 64 - EVENTS AND OTHER Surplus (Deficit): 10,000.00 10,000.00 -4,551.00 5,449.00 5,449.00 45.51% Department: 65 - PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
480 - FEES FOR SERVICES 17,900.00 17,900.00 -16,746.00 93.55% 1,154.00 1,154.00 600 - SALARIES AND WAGES 264,276.00 264,276.00 225,632.88 85.38% 38,643.12 38,643.12 601 - RETIREMENT 25,626.00 25,626.00 22,233.58 86.76% 3,392.42 3,392.42 602 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 84,203.00 84,203.00 77,061.90 91.52% 7,141.10 7,141.10 610 - TRAINING 6,700.00 6,700.00 6,700.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 611 - OUTSIDE SERVICES 121,683.00 121,683.00 121,683.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 613 - PUBLICATION / DUES 700.00 700.00 700.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 615 - BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 617 - UTILITIES 15,800.00 15,800.00 14,609.83 92.47% 1,190.17 1,190.17 618 - HIRING 3,200.00 3,200.00 3,200.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 620 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 35,023.00 35,023.00 32,489.48 92.77% 2,533.52 2,533.52 622 - DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES 9,500.00 9,500.00 9,052.52 95.29% 447.48 447.48 Department: 65 - PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Surplus (Deficit): -554,211.00 -554,211.00 502,017.19 -52,193.81 -52,193.81 90.58% Report Surplus (Deficit): 11,408.27 11,408.27 0.00 0.00 11,408.27 0.00% 117
Budget Report For Fiscal: 2026-2027 Period Ending: 07/31/2026 8/10/2026 5:33:02 PM Page 2 of 2
Fund Summary
Fiscal
AcƟvity
Variance
Favorable
Fund (Unfavorable)
Period
AcƟvity
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
21 - RECREATION 0.00 0.00 11,408.27 11,408.27 11,408.27 Report Surplus (Deficit): 11,408.27 11,408.27 0.00 0.00 11,408.27 118
8/10/2026 5:33:43 PM Page 1 of 3
Budget Report
Town of San Anselmo Account Summary
For Fiscal: 2026-2027 Period Ending: 07/31/2026
Fiscal
AcƟvity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Percent
Remaining
Current
Total Budget
Period
AcƟvity
Original
Total Budget
Fund: 21 - RECREATION
Expense
SubCategory: 619 - MISCELLANEOUS

21.64 OLDER ADUILT PROGRAMMING 15,000.00 606.60 14,393.40 95.96 % 15,000.00 606.60

21.64 SPECIAL EVENT EXPENSE 7,000.00 -1,084.84 8,084.84 115.50 % 7,000.00 -1,084.84 SubCategory: 619 - MISCELLANEOUS Total: -478.24 22,000.00 22,000.00 22,478.24 102.17% -478.24 SubCategory: 631 - CAPITAL OUTLAY - CONSTRUCTION

21.65.63100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - CONSTRUCTION 150,000.00 8,742.00 141,258.00 94.17 % 150,000.00 8,742.00 SubCategory: 631 - CAPITAL OUTLAY - CONSTRUCTION Total: 8,742.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 141,258.00 94.17% 8,742.00 Expense Total: 8,263.76 172,000.00 172,000.00 163,736.24 95.20% 8,263.76 Fund: 21 - RECREATION Total: 8,263.76 172,000.00 172,000.00 163,736.24 95.20% 8,263.76 Report Total: 8,263.76 8,263.76 172,000.00 172,000.00 163,736.24 95.20% 119
Budget Report For Fiscal: 2026-2027 Period Ending: 07/31/2026 8/10/2026 5:33:43 PM Page 2 of 3
Group Summary
Fiscal
AcƟvity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
SubCategory AcƟvity
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Remaining
Fund: 21 - RECREATION
Expense
619 - MISCELLANEOUS 22,000.00 22,000.00 22,478.24 102.17% -478.24 -478.24 631 - CAPITAL OUTLAY - CONSTRUCTION 150,000.00 150,000.00 141,258.00 94.17% 8,742.00 8,742.00 Expense Total: 172,000.00 172,000.00 163,736.24 8,263.76 8,263.76 95.20% Fund: 21 - RECREATION Total: 172,000.00 172,000.00 163,736.24 8,263.76 8,263.76 95.20% Report Total: 8,263.76 8,263.76 172,000.00 172,000.00 163,736.24 95.20% 120
Budget Report For Fiscal: 2026-2027 Period Ending: 07/31/2026 8/10/2026 5:33:43 PM Page 3 of 3
Fund Summary
Fiscal
AcƟvity
Variance
Favorable
Fund (Unfavorable)
Period
AcƟvity
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Remaining
21 - RECREATION 172,000.00 172,000.00 163,736.24 95.20% 8,263.76 8,263.76 Report Total: 8,263.76 8,263.76 172,000.00 172,000.00 163,736.24 95.20% 121
Item #: 1.7

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item #: 1.7
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Adopt an Ordinance Amendment Repealing and Replacing Title 10 “Planning and Zoning”, Chapter 11 “Density Bonus” Consistent with State Law.

FROM: Community Development Department
Emily Longfellow, Assistant Town Attorney

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached Ordinance entitled, “Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of San Anselmo Repealing and Replacing Title 10 “Planning and Zoning”, Chapter 11 “Density Bonus” and Making Associated CEQA Exemption Findings.” (Attachment 1)

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
On July 28, 2026, the Town Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 10-11 of the San Anselmo Municipal Code regarding implementation of California's State Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915 et seq.). Following the public hearing, the Council introduced the ordinance and directed staff to return with the ordinance for adoption.

The proposed ordinance is a housekeeping amendment to ensure the Municipal Code remains consistent with State law. The Town's Density Bonus regulations were last updated in 2014, and the State Density Bonus Law has been amended numerous times since then. Rather than continuing to amend the Municipal Code each time State law changes, the proposed ordinance repeals and replaces the existing chapter with streamlined language that directly references the State Density Bonus Law and automatically incorporates future amendments.

Approval of the ordinance will ensure the Municipal Code remains consistent with current and future State Density Bonus Law while reducing the need for future local code amendments as State law evolves.

FISCAL IMPACT
No new fiscal impacts.

GENERAL PLAN AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CONSISTENCY
The proposed Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element because it aligns with the Housing Element and encourages the development 122
Item #: 1.7
of housing at all income levels. The Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the Town’s Climate Action Plan Policy T-9 (Smart Growth Development).

CEQA AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
The Ordinance Amendment implements and conforms the Town's Density Bonus regulations to State Density Bonus Law (Government Code section 65915 et seq.). The Ordinance Amendment is not a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378 because it consists of organizational and administrative actions implementing mandatory provisions of state law and does not commit the Town to any specific development project. Alternatively, the Ordinance Amendment is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), the common sense exemption, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adoption of the Ordinance Amendment, by itself, may have a significant effect on the environment. Future development projects utilizing Density Bonus Law will undergo project-specific environmental review as required by CEQA.

ATTACHMENT
Attachment 1: Ordinance Amendment
123
1 ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO REPEALING AND REPLACING TITLE 10 “PLANNING AND ZONING”, CHAPTER 11 “DENSITY BONUS” AND MAKING ASSOCIATED CEQA EXEMPTION FINDINGS WHEREAS, State Density Bonus Law, Government Code section 65915 et seq. allows a developer to build more housing units than allowed by local regulations (a density bonus), provides certain concessions and incentives, and allows for the waiver or reduction of local development standards if the development meets certain requirements regarding the inclusion of affordable housing; and
WHEREAS, the State of California has declared a “housing emergency” and periodically updates State housing laws, including State Density Bonus Law; and WHEREAS, the Town of San Anselmo has a Density Bonus Ordinance that was last updated in 2014; and
WHEREAS, the Town desires to simplify its Density Bonus Ordinance to help ensure consistency with State law and accommodate future State law modifications; and WHEREAS, the ordinance amendment would repeal and replace Town Municipal Code, Title 10, Chapter 11 “Density Bonus” consistent with State law (“Ordinance Amendment”); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is responsible for providing recommendations to the Town Council for proposed amendments to the Town’s Zoning Code pursuant to Government Code section 65853 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on July 20, 2026 and voted to recommend that the Town Council adopt the Ordinance Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Town Clerk caused notice of a Town Council public hearing regarding the Town Council’s consideration of adoption of the Ordinance Amendment in the Marin Independent Journal newspaper on as required by Government Code section 36933 and published the text of the Ordinance Amendment as required by State law; and WHEREAS, on July 28, 2026 the Town Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider introduction of the Ordinance Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Ordinance Amendment complies with State Density Bonus Law and is not considered a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Division 13 (commencing with Section 2100) of the Public Resources Code. The Ordinance Amendment is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 involving the minor alteration of existing residences involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that already in existence; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility they would have a significant effect on the environment; the Amendment make minimal changes to land uses, development intensities, and the rate at which development is expected to occur, and are required by State Density Bonus Law Government Code section 65915 et seq.; and
124
2 WHEREAS, the proposed Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the General Plan because the General Plan Housing Element encourages the development of new housing and the proposed Amendment will facilitate housing production, and comply with State law; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of the proposed Ordinance Amendment is in the public interest because it encourages the development of increased housing and affordable housing, and is necessary to comply with State law; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated as findings herein.

SECTION 2: Environmental Review. The Ordinance Amendment complies with State Density Bonus Law and is not considered a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Division 13 (commencing with Section 2100) of the Public Resources Code. The Ordinance Amendment is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 involving the minor alteration of existing residences involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that already in existence; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility they would have a significant effect on the environment; the amendment make minimal changes to land uses, development intensities, and the rate at which development is expected to occur, and are required by State Density Bonus Law Government Code section 65915 et seq.

SECTION 3: General Plan Consistency Finding. Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the General Plan because the General Plan Housing Element encourages the development of new housing and the proposed Amendment will facilitate housing production, and comply with State law.

SECTION 4: Ordinance Amendment.

Title 10 of the San Anselmo Municipal Code “Planning and Zoning”, Chapter 11 “Density Bonus” is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced as follows:

DENSITY BONUS
10-11.010 – Title, Purpose, and Incorporation of Amendments. (a) Title. This chapter shall be known as the “San Anselmo Density Bonus Ordinance”.
(b) Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to comply with State Density Bonus Law, Government Code sections 65915 through 65918, as may be amended from time to time, facilitate the production of affordable housing, and to implement the goals, policies, and programs of the San Anselmo General Plan Housing Element.
(c) If any provisions of the State Density Bonus Law are amended, those provisions shall be automatically incorporated into this chapter. In the event of 125
3 any inconsistencies between State Density Bonus Law and the provisions of this chapter, the provisions of the State Density Bonus Law shall apply. 10-11.020 – Definitions. The definitions found in the State Density Bonus Law shall apply to this chapter, unless otherwise specified.
10-11.030 – Applicability. This chapter shall apply to all zoning districts that permit housing under the General Plan Land Use Element designation and/or Zoning District.

Where the density allowed under the Zoning District is inconsistent with the density allowed under the General Plan, the General Plan density designation shall prevail. 10-11.040 – Application. An applicant seeking a density bonus, incentive or concession, waiver or modification of a development standard, or a revised parking standard shall submit an application on a form provided by the Community Development Department (“Application”), which shall be processed concurrently with all other applications required for the housing development project. The applicant shall submit reasonable documentation to establish eligibility for the requested density bonus, incentives or concessions, and/or waivers or reductions of development standards and parking ratios to the reasonable satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The Application shall be processed in the same manner, and concurrently with, the application for the development.
10-11.050 – Eligibility Guarantees. Prior to construction of a density bonus development project, the developer shall ensure that the applicable unit(s) retain their affordability consistent with State Density Bonus Law to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, which may include, but is not limited to, entering into an agreement with the Town in a form acceptable to the Town Attorney providing that the unit(s) will be subject to a deed restriction(s), and recording such deed restriction(s) against the property.
10-11.060 – Review. In reviewing an application for a density bonus, incentive or concession, or waiver or modification of a development standard the following findings and requirements apply:
(1) An application for a density bonus, concession or incentive, and/or waiver or modification of a development standard shall be granted if the requirements of the State Density Bonus Law, as may be amended from time to time, are satisfied.
(2) For a housing development qualifying pursuant to the requirements of Government Code section 65915, the Town shall grant a density bonus in an amount specified by Government Code section 65915. The density bonus units shall not be included when calculating the total number of housing units that qualify the housing development for a density bonus, except as may otherwise be required by Government Code section 65915. All density calculations resulting in a fractional unit shall be rounded up to the next whole number. (3) The Town shall grant the applicant the number of incentives or concessions as required by Government Code section 65915, and shall grant the specific 126
4 concession(s) or incentive(s) requested unless the Town makes written findings based on substantial evidence pursuant to Government Code section 65915(d).
(4) The Town shall grant a waiver or reduction in a development standard if the development standard would have the effect of physically precluding the project at the requested densities and with the concessions or incentives permitted.

The Town shall approve the waiver or reduction of the development standard(s) unless the Town makes written findings based on substantial evidence pursuant to Government Code section 65915(e).
(5) The Town shall not condition the submission, review, or approval of an application pursuant to this Chapter on the preparation of an additional report or study that is not otherwise required by State law; provided, however, that the Town may require the applicant to provide reasonable documentation to establish eligibility for a density bonus, an incentive or concession, or a waiver or reduction in development standards.

SECTION 5: Severability. The Town Council hereby declares every section, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase is severable. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance Amendment for any reason is found to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity, or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases.

SECTION 6: Effective Date. This Ordinance Amendment shall go into effect thirty (30) days from its adoption. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days of adoption, this Ordinance Amendment or a summary thereof pursuant to Government Code section 36933, shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation, along with the names of the members of the Town Council voting for and against its adoption.

THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the San Anselmo Town Council on July 28, 2026, 2026, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the San Anselmo Council on August 25, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

RECUSED:

APPROVED:___________________________
Steve Burdo, Mayor
ATTEST:_______________________________
Serge Avila, Town Clerk
127
Item #: 1.8

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item #: 1.8
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Authorize the Mayor to Sign a Position Letter for Central Marin Sanitation Agency
FROM: Administration
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a position letter addressed to the Central Marin Sanitation Agency regarding the treatment cost allocation methodology

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The Town Council received a request from Mayor Burdo and was supported unanimously by the Councilmembers authorizing the Mayor to sign a formal position letter addressed to the Central Marin Sanitation Agency regarding the treatment cost allocation methodology reinstating the flow/strength method.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with authorizing the mayor to sign the letter.

CEQA AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Council’s authorization the Mayor to sign a letter is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act, because it does not involve an activity which has the potential to cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21065).

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1- Draft Position Letter
128
Dear Central Marin Sanitation Agency (CMSA) Board of Commissioners, The Town of San Anselmo — a jurisdiction served by the Ross Valley Sanitary District (RVSD) — is writing to state our position that we believe RVSD ratepayers are being unfairly overcharged under CMSA's new flow-only treatment cost allocation.

CMSA's April 14, 2026, vote to abandon its flow/strength allocation method — approved 3-2 over both RVSD commissioners' objections — significantly increased RVSD's quarterly treatment cost from $1,303,859.88 to $1,957,774.26. This is not a routine adjustment; it is a significant cost shift imposed without adequate technical or legal justification that increases sanitation agency costs for San Anselmo residents.

RVSD engaged Water Resources Economics (WRE), an independent consultant, to review CMSA's decision against industry practice and applicable law. WRE's findings are unambiguous. Among seven comparable California wholesale treatment agencies surveyed, only CMSA and one other rely on flow-only allocation; the rest use flow-strength or the closely related Equivalent Dwelling Unit method. Notably, CMSA's prior formula already weighted flow more heavily than peer agencies that use flow-strength — meaning CMSA was not correcting an outlier position but pushing an already flow-heavy method to its extreme.

WRE also contacted the Regional Water Board directly, which confirmed in writing that CMSA's NPDES permit does not prohibit the inclusion of wastewater strength in a flow-based rate structure — directly refuting the justification CMSA staff presented to the Commission.

Separately, the Clean Water Act and its implementing regulations require that treatment charges reflect each member's proportionate share of wastewater loading, a term that explicitly includes strength, not volume alone. State guidelines permit flow-only allocation only for small service areas with no industrial users or where residential flow exceeds 95% of total design flow — conditions CMSA plainly does not meet.

Furthermore, Proposition 26 requires that treatment charges bear a fair and reasonable relationship to a payor's actual burden on the system. RVSD's wastewater is demonstrably lower in strength than that of other JPA members and San Quentin. A flow-only method that ignores this documented difference does not meet that standard and exposes CMSA and its member agencies to legal risk.

Therefore, the Town of San Anselmo, on behalf of our residents and businesses, joins the Ross Valley Sanitary District in calling on the CMSA Commission to reverse this decision and reinstate the flow/strength method without further delay.

Respectfully,
129
Item #: 1.9

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item #: 1.9
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Accept the Fire Station 20 Renovation Project and Authorize Staff to File a Notice of Completion
FROM: Department of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION: That the Town Council accepts the Fire Station 20 Renovation Project and authorizes staff to file a Notice of Completion.

Fire Station 20 was initially constructed in 1959 and is situated over Sleepy Hollow Creek. The building, being nearly 65 years old, desperately needed repair to all the exterior materials including the windows, siding, and roof. New interior space planning was also required to accommodate additional personnel and a diverse workforce. On March 14, 2023, Town Council provided direction to staff for the use of the American Rescue Plan Act State & Local Fiscal Relief Funds (ARPA).

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Fire Station 20 remained active throughout construction. Temporary living quarters for personnel were accommodated on-site, alongside a temporary apparatus bay for the fire engines.

The scope of the project work included:
• Floodproofing the living quarters
• Expanding and raising the living quarters, 1ft above base flood elevation • Reconfiguring the interior of the building for accessibility purposes • Removing and replacing exterior materials
• Adding a room for storing and cleaning PPE (personal protective equipment) Project milestone dates:

January 14, 2025: Project construction officially began March 3, 2025: Station personnel moved into the temporary on-site quarters February 2, 2026: Station personnel moved into the new building August 13, 2026: Project construction is completed
130
Item #: 1.9

FISCAL IMPACT
The final contract amount for the Fire Station 20 Renovation Project is $4,064,608.15 (17.8% above base contract) which has been funded through ARPA, the Sleepy Hollow Fire Protection Authority, and the Town’s Building Maintenance Fund.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Town finds this project consistent with the following General Plan elements:
• Land Use Element Objective 12: To maintain the current level of public services to the citizens of the Town and to continue to support improvements to public utilities as needed.
• Safety Element Policy S-1.5: Require public buildings are maintained to support their resilience in the face of natural disasters.
• Safety Element Action S-1.5a: Maintain the structural and operational integrity of essential public facilities during hazard events.

CEQA AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Town finds this project to be categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under a Class 1 categorical exemption for an existing facility and the addition falls under the exemption by being less than 50% of the floor area or less than 2,500 square feet (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15301).

The remodel of Fire Station 20 is consistent with the Climate Action Plan under sections E-3, Cool Roofs, and R-3, Building and Appliance Electrification. 131
Item #: 2.1

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item #: 2.1
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Cybersecurity and IT Resilience: Overview of Town Systems, Incident Response, and Cyber Insurance
Coverage
FROM: Jeff Zuba, Finance & Administrative Services Director RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file this report and receive presentations from Marin IT and Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority on the Town’s cybersecurity posture, incident response protocols, and cyber insurance coverage.

BACKGROUND
At a prior Town Council meeting, Councilmember Schlesinger and the full Council requested that staff return with a report on how the Town would respond in the event of a cyber attack. In response to that direction, staff has prepared this report and coordinated with two key Town partners to present alongside staff:
 Marin IT: the Town’s contracted managed IT services provider, responsible for day-to-day technology support, infrastructure management, and cybersecurity services.
 Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority (Bay Cities): the Town’s risk insurance pool, through which the Town maintains its cyber insurance coverage.

Both Marin IT and Bay Cities will participate in the August 25, 2026, Town Council meeting to present alongside Town staff. This report focuses specifically on the Town’s cybersecurity environment. Bay Cities’ broader role as the Town’s provider of liability, property, and workers’ compensation coverage will be discussed at the meeting. 132
Item #: 2.1
SECTION I: Introduction to Marin IT
The Town of San Anselmo has contracted with Marin IT for managed IT services for approximately 20 years. Marin IT serves multiple Marin County jurisdictions, including the City of Mill Valley, Town of Corte Madera, City of Sausalito, Town of Ross, and Town of Fairfax, among others. This regional model provides shared infrastructure expertise and coordinated support that individual municipalities could not cost-effectively maintain on their own, and means Marin IT has deep familiarity with the specific technology environments, compliance requirements, and threat landscape facing local governments in Marin County. Services provided to San Anselmo include:
 Help desk and end-user technical support
 Network infrastructure management and monitoring
 Cybersecurity tools deployment and oversight
 Software licensing and patch management
 Strategic technology planning and vendor coordination Marin IT will present directly to the Council at the August 25, 2026, meeting to walk through the Town’s current cyber security environment and answer questions. Because Marin IT serves multiple Marin County jurisdictions on shared infrastructure, a security lapse affecting Marin IT could potentially affect San Anselmo.

Marin IT’s client credentials are stored in the cloud on Marin IT’s MSP software, which is shared infrastructure across Marin IT’s client base. None of the Town’s data is hosted at Marin IT’s physical location; the Town’s data resides in its own cloud environments and on-premise systems.

SECTION II: Current Cybersecurity Protections
The Town’s IT environment is managed by Marin IT and reflects a layered approach to cybersecurity. The following tools and platforms are currently in use:

Tool / Platform Function
Qualys Quarterly vulnerability scans across Town systems and devices; findings are reviewed by Marin IT and prioritized for remediation based on severity
CISA External vulnerability scans across the Town
Auvik Network monitoring: real-time visibility into network traffic and device health
KnowBe4 Security awareness training and phishing simulation exercises for all staff
KnowBe4 PhishER Automated investigation and quarantine of reported phishing emails; AI-based threat classification
133
Item #: 2.1
Veeam / 11:11 Immutable cloud backup for Microsoft 365 data, tested regularly for restorability
Cisco Duo Advantage Multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access, email, and admin accounts
Proofpoint Email spam filtering, anti-virus, attachment defense, data loss prevention (DLP), and zero-hour threat defense
CrowdStrike Endpoint protection across 73 Town users
ConnectWise Automate Remote monitoring and management (RMM) for Windows workstations and servers
1Password Password management for Town staff accounts and credentials CrowdStrike Falcon with
SIEM
Managed detection and response with Security Information and Event Management (SIEM): 24/7 Security Operations Center (SOC) monitoring, threat detection, monitoring networks for suspicious activity, and active response. The Town transitioned from Arctic Wolf MDR to CrowdStrike Falcon with SIEM in fiscal year 2026–2027, upgrading to an enterprise-grade platform with enhanced threat intelligence and integrated endpoint detection.

What the Town’s Cybersecurity Program Protects Against
The tools above work together rather than independently. In practice, this means that a threat blocked by one tool may also be caught by another, and a failure in one area does not leave the Town without protection. The following describes how the key tools function together:
 Perimeter defense, keeping threats out before they reach staff: Proofpoint filters malicious emails before they reach staff inboxes, blocking spam, phishing attempts, dangerous attachments, and data leaving the Town network without authorization. This is the first line of defense against the most common attack vector: email.
 Identity & access control, making stolen passwords insufficient: Cisco Duo Advantage requires multi-factor authentication for remote access, email, and administrator accounts. Even if a staff member’s password is compromised, an attacker cannot access Town systems without also having the staff member’s second authentication factor. 1Password further reduces risk by ensuring staff use strong, unique passwords across all accounts.
 Endpoint protection, defending every device: CrowdStrike provides real-time threat detection and response on all 73 Town user devices. ConnectWise Automate enables Marin IT to remotely monitor, patch, and manage every workstation and server, ensuring systems stay up to date and vulnerabilities are addressed promptly.
134
Item #: 2.1
 Network visibility, knowing what is happening on the Town network: Auvik provides real-time visibility into network traffic and connected devices, allowing Marin IT to detect unusual activity. Qualys conducts quarterly vulnerability scans to proactively identify and remediate weaknesses before they can be exploited.  24/7 threat detection and response (CrowdStrike Falcon with SIEM): In fiscal year 2025–2026 the Town utilized Arctic Wolf MDR, which provided 24/7 SOC monitoring through a human analyst team. In fiscal year 2026–2027 the Town transitioned to CrowdStrike Falcon with SIEM. CrowdStrike adds AI-based threat detection to the human element, identifying threats faster and with greater accuracy than human review alone. CrowdStrike also includes a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system, which maintains a continuous log of security events across Town systems, providing an audit trail that supports both incident investigation and ongoing compliance monitoring.  Human layer, making staff an asset rather than a vulnerability: KnowBe4 training and simulated phishing campaigns keep staff alert to social engineering tactics. KnowBe4 PhishER ensures that when staff report a suspicious email, it is automatically investigated and quarantined, turning a potential threat into a stopped one.
 Recovery layer, supporting faster data restoration after an incident: Veeam / 11:11 maintains immutable cloud backups of Microsoft 365 data. Immutable means the backups cannot be encrypted or deleted by ransomware; they are locked from modification. This gives the Town the ability to restore data to a known clean state without negotiating with an attacker.

No single tool provides complete protection, which is why the Town maintains multiple overlapping systems. Marin IT coordinates these tools and monitors their effectiveness on an ongoing basis.

Cloud vs. On-Premise Systems
The majority of software and applications used by the Town are cloud-based, which reduces on-premise infrastructure risk and facilitates remote access continuity. The one notable exception is the Town’s financial system:
 Finance: Currently hosted on-premise. The Town’s network file folders are also maintained locally. Staff have been in contact with Tyler Technologies to explore transitioning to their cloud-hosted platform. The Town Attorney has reviewed the agreement, and staff are now working through the signature process accordingly the cloud-hosted version is expected to be in place soon. Once implemented, finance staff would be able to continue operating normally from anywhere in the 135
Item #: 2.1
event Town Hall systems go down. This includes running payroll and paying vendors. The Town has traditionally paid vendors only via check, but has set up the capability to pay vendors via ACH; staff must still follow internal procedures to call the vendor and confirm banking details rather than relying solely on what is listed on the invoice.
 The Town has bank accounts with Wells Fargo and Bank of America. In the event the local branches are inaccessible, the Finance staff could access the information online from anywhere or visit a different branch within California if needed to conduct business. In the event of a broader banking system outage affecting online or electronic access, staff would delay non-urgent payments, issue physical checks in place of electronic transfers where payments cannot wait, and use the Town’s CalCard to purchase necessary supplies or materials if that system remains operational.

Data Backup & Testing
The Town maintains a regular backup schedule for all critical systems, managed by Marin IT. Backups are a foundational element of the Town’s ability to recover from a ransomware attack or data loss event. Current backup practices are as follows:
 Microsoft 365 data (email, Teams, SharePoint): Backed up via Veeam to the cloud; 11:11 then runs a copy job to store a second copy also in the cloud.

Backup frequency: Immediately and daily. Retention period: 30 days.  Tyler Finance and local file folders (on-premise): Backed up via Veeam / 11:11 to both on-premise storage and the cloud. Backup frequency: Continuous and daily. Backup location: On-premise and cloud. Retention period: 30 days.  Backup testing: Backups are tested on a quarterly basis to verify that data can be successfully restored. Most recent backup restoration test: June 2026. Testing ensures that backups are not just being created but are usable in a recovery scenario.

Staff Security Awareness Training
Phishing emails remain one of the most common entry points for cyberattacks against government agencies. The Town uses KnowBe4, a leading security awareness training platform, to provide ongoing cybersecurity education to all staff. The program includes:
 Online training modules for all staff covering phishing recognition, password hygiene, social engineering tactics, and safe internet practices 136
Item #: 2.1
 Simulated phishing campaigns that test staff’s ability to identify suspicious emails in a controlled environment; results are tracked and used to target additional training where needed
 Staff reporting tools that allow employees to flag suspicious emails directly to Marin IT for review, supported by KnowBe4 PhishER for automated investigation and quarantine
Staff are often the first line of defense against cyber threats. The Town conducts annual tabletop exercises simulating ransomware and cyber breach scenarios to ensure all key decision-makers are aligned on roles and protocols before a real incident occurs. The most recent tabletop exercise was held in October 2025 and was conducted with Marin IT, the Town’s Bay Cities Cyber Risk Manager, and the Town’s internal leadership team, which included the Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager / Town Librarian, Town Clerk, Community Engagement Coordinator, Community Development Director (Alternate Board Member, Bay Cities), and Finance & Administrative Services Director (Primary Board Member, Bay Cities).

In the Town’s most recent phishing simulation campaign, conducted February through June 2026 over five weekly rounds, the Town averaged approximately one failure per week, meaning only one individual clicked on a simulated phishing link in any given week, for a total of approximately five failures across 73 users. These are controlled, staff-run exercises designed to test and improve readiness; they are not actual security incidents and did not involve any real compromise of Town systems or data. Approximately 80% of staff complete KnowBe4 training. Completion of KnowBe4 training modules is encouraged rather than mandatory; staff sends periodic reminders to encourage participation.

Staff also have access to a Phish Alert Button in Outlook, which automatically forwards suspicious emails to Marin IT for review; currently approximately 50% of staff utilize this tool. Use of the Phish Alert Button is likewise encouraged rather than mandatory. Staff sends reminders and will continue to encourage broader adoption of the Phish Alert Button as part of ongoing security awareness efforts.

SECTION III: Incident Response
In the event of a cyber incident, the Town has established protocols for detection, containment, recovery, communications, and post-incident review. The Town maintains two formal documents governing this process: a Cyber Incident Response Plan and a Technology Recovery Plan. Both are living documents reviewed and updated periodically in coordination with Marin IT and Bay Cities, most recently reviewed in October 2025. The Town has not experienced a confirmed cybersecurity incident to date. The Town’s Incident Response Team (IRT) has been formally designated and includes: Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager / Town Librarian, Town Clerk, Community Engagement Coordinator, Senior Accountant/Finance Supervisor (Alternate Board Member, Bay Cities), Finance & Administrative Services Director (Primary Board 137
Item #: 2.1
Member, Bay Cities), and Marin IT, with Bay Cities participating in an advisory and support capacity. The following outlines the Town’s approach in each phase.

A. Detection & Identification
Cyber incidents may be identified through multiple channels:
 Automated alerts from CrowdStrike Falcon with SIEM (24/7 SOC monitoring)  Staff reports of unusual system behavior, phishing emails, or unauthorized access attempts
 Vendor or partner notifications
 Alerts from the Multi-State Information Sharing & Analysis Center (MS-ISAC), a no-cost threat intelligence resource for local governments Common indicators include unusual login activity, endpoint alerts, reported phishing link clicks, or files that appear encrypted or inaccessible.

B. Escalation & Containment
Upon detection, Marin IT and Town staff coordinate immediately to assess severity and contain the threat. Steps include:
 Isolating affected systems or user accounts to contain potential spread (CrowdStrike Falcon with SIEM can auto-isolate compromised devices in real time)
 Notifying Town Manager and, depending on severity, legal counsel or a cybersecurity incident response firm
 Contacting Sedgwick (Bay Cities’ Cyber Risk Manager) to engage insurance resources and incident response support. Sedgwick is available year-round for pre-incident planning support, not only at the time of an incident or annual assessment
 Documenting all actions taken and preserving evidence for forensic review C. Recovery & Estimated Restoration Times
Recovery timelines vary significantly depending on which systems are affected and the nature of the incident. Because the majority of Town systems are cloud-based, most services can be restored faster than in a traditional on-premise environment. The following are estimated restoration timeframes by system type:
138
Item #: 2.1
 Microsoft 365 (email, Teams, SharePoint): Target recovery time: 24 hours (per Technology Recovery Plan). Cloud-based; backed up via Veeam/11:11 immutable backup.
 Other cloud-based applications (permitting, agenda management, etc.):

Target recovery time: 24–48 hours depending on system (per Technology Recovery Plan). Vendor-hosted; generally accessible even if Town network is affected, as long as internet connectivity is maintained.  Tyler Finance (on-premise financial system): 36–72 hours. As the Town’s primary on-premise system, Tyler Finance requires physical infrastructure recovery, which typically takes longer to restore than cloud-based systems. Staff and Marin IT have discussed contingency hosting locations for the system in the event of an emergency.
 Local file folders (on-premise network shares): Target recovery time: 24–48 hours (per Technology Recovery Plan). Restored from backup; timeline depends on volume of data and scope of incident.

D. Communications Continuity
A cyber incident or network outage may affect the Town’s primary communication infrastructure, including Microsoft Teams phone lines and internet connectivity. The Town has taken the following steps to ensure staff can continue to communicate during such an event:
 Starlink Business satellite internet: The Starlink Business subscription is budgeted, and staff will be acquiring it as soon as possible to serve as a backup internet connection. Operating independently of terrestrial fiber and commercial ISP infrastructure, Starlink can maintain connectivity for email, web-based systems, and Town communications even if the primary connection is down.  Satellite phones (2): The two satellite phones are budgeted, and staff will be acquiring them as soon as possible for use in the event that both the Town’s network and cellular infrastructure are unavailable. These operate independently of cell towers and provide a reliable voice communication channel for the public to reach staff when the systems are down. Staff may consider sending a postcard to homes or including this information in the Town’s newsletter to inform residents.
 Key staff contact information: Personal cell phone numbers for key Town staff and Marin IT contacts are maintained in the Incident Response Plan so that communication can continue even if Town email and phone systems are unavailable.
139
Item #: 2.1
 Marin Emergency Radio Network: The Town participates in the Marin Emergency Radio Network, which provides a dedicated communication channel with public safety partners including police and fire in the event that standard phone lines and network infrastructure are unavailable. This ensures the Town can maintain critical coordination with first responders during a major cyber incident or communications outage.

E. Public & External Communications
In the event of a significant cyber incident, the Town Manager’s Office would coordinate public communications. Key principles include:
 Timely, factual notification to the public and Council when Town services are affected
 Coordination with legal counsel prior to any public disclosure if sensitive data may have been accessed
 Compliance with California data breach notification requirements (Civil Code § 1798.29), which impose legal deadlines for notifying affected individuals, not just an operational obligation
 The Town Manager will provide a written After-Action Report to the Town Council within 30 days of system restoration following any significant incident F. What This Means for Residents
In the event of a significant cyber incident, residents may experience temporary disruptions to certain Town services. The following resident-facing services are most likely to be affected and are prioritized accordingly in the Town’s recovery planning:
 Online payments and permits: Resident-facing online portals for permit applications and payments are cloud-hosted and would generally remain accessible during a network incident affecting only Town Hall systems. In a broader outage, staff can accept payments and process requests manually.  Town website: The Town website is hosted externally and would remain operational in most incident scenarios, allowing staff to post updates and service advisories to keep residents informed.
 Phone and in-person service: Town Hall would remain open for in-person service. The Town’s Starlink backup internet and satellite phones will ensure that staff can continue to communicate and assist residents even if primary phone and internet systems are affected.
140
Item #: 2.1
The Town’s first priority in any incident is to maintain public-facing services and communicate transparently with residents about any disruptions and expected restoration timelines.

SECTION IV: Cyber Insurance Through Bay Cities
The Town maintains cyber liability insurance coverage through the Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority, the Town’s risk insurance pool. Bay Cities has partnered with Beazley, one of the nation’s leading cyber insurers, for more than ten years through its APIP (Alliant Property Insurance Program) arrangement, managed by Bay Cities’ broker Alliant. The following summarizes the Town’s coverage structure, what it covers, and how it works when an incident occurs.

Coverage Structure
San Anselmo’s cyber coverage is made up of three layers, each building on the last:
 Layer 1: APIP Cyber Liability (Beazley, all Bay Cities members): $2,000,000 per member aggregate limit (part of a $85,000,000 program aggregate). All Bay Cities members participate. This is the base cyber liability policy underwritten by Beazley.
 Layer 2: Excess Cyber Insurance (all Bay Cities members, since July 1, 2020): $3,000,000 per member aggregate and $5,000,000 policy aggregate. This excess layer is dedicated to Bay Cities members and follows the form of the base policy. It also doubles the underlying sublimits for key coverage categories including Data & Network Liability, Regulatory Defense & Penalties, Payment Card Liabilities, and Media Liability.
 Layer 3: BBR Endorsement (Beazley, San Anselmo participates): San Anselmo also purchases the Beazley Breach Response (BBR) Endorsement.

BBR provides additional response coverage in the event the Town is required to notify individuals of breach, including notification, call center services, and credit monitoring. The coverage provides notification costs of 100,000 non-monetary notified lives limit outside of the aggregate provided in Layer 1 and will not erode these coverage limits. The BBR endorsement will also increase the Breach Response Costs coverage to full limit within the aggregate limit on layers 1 and 2 should a Beazley approved vendor be utilized. In addition, the endorsement provides $250,000 of additional coverage for Legal, Forensics, and Crisis Management outside of the aggregate limit. It also provides reduced deductibles for certain expenses such as Legal, Forensics, and PR consulting. 141
Item #: 2.1
Retentions (Deductibles)
Under the base APIP policy, the Town’s retention per claim or incident is $50,000 / 8 Hours. The BBR enhancement the Town participates in lowers this retention substantially, to 100 notified lives for Breach Response Services only and $10,000 for public relations and Crisis Management and $5,000 for legal, separating the limits for notification costs, which is a significant benefit in breach scenarios involving resident data. If multiple coverage parts are in play for a claim, the highest applicable retention will apply.

What the Coverage Includes
The Town’s cyber coverage through Bay Cities and Beazley covers a broad range of incident-related costs. The following coverage categories apply at full limit under both the base and excess layers:
 Data & Network Liability
 Regulatory Defense & Penalties
 Payment Card Liabilities & Costs
 Media Liability (Electronic Only)
The Layer 1 policy also provides full limit coverage of the following due to the Town meeting qualifying conditions through its existing security practices, which are MFA and an Endpoint Protection Platform Network Wide at the time of loss. For any additional layers above Layer 1, the policy will follow form for coverage and limits:
 Business Interruption Resulting from Security Breach
 Business Interruption Resulting from System Failure
 Cyber Extortion Loss
 Data Recovery Costs
How Coverage Works in Practice: When an Incident Occurs The Town’s Incident Response Plan designates a Breach Coordinator responsible for managing the Town’s response and serving as the primary liaison with Beazley, outside vendors, and Alliant. The Breach Coordinator is drawn from the Town’s Incident Response Team. The Town’s designated Breach Coordinator is the Town Manager or designee. The following steps apply when a cyber incident occurs:
 Notify Beazley immediately: For any suspected data breach, security breach, cyber extortion threat, or system failure, the Town notifies Beazley as soon as possible. Early notification is critical: it helps preserve the Town’s rights under the policy. Alliant is also notified simultaneously.
 Content of the notice: The initial notice includes a brief description of the incident, the date of the incident (if known), the date it was discovered, and the Breach Coordinator’s contact information. Specific personally identifiable 142
Item #: 2.1
information (PII) or protected health information (PHI) should not be included in the initial notice.
 The first 24 hours: Secure, Mitigate, Coordinate. Town IT (Marin IT / CrowdStrike Falcon) secures affected systems. Staff preserves all evidence related to the incident (emails, logs, and documentation) to support forensic investigation. Within the first 24 hours, the Town’s Breach Coordinator is contacted by a Beazley Cyber Claims Manager or Coverage Counsel representative, who coordinates a conference call to discuss the incident and next steps.
 Expert resources activated through the policy: Beazley arranges access to its vetted network of incident response experts at favorable rates, including Privacy Counsel (legal guidance on breach notification obligations), Digital Forensics specialists (to investigate how the breach occurred and what data was accessed), and Notification and Call Center services (to manage resident and staff notifications if data was compromised).

Coverage Requirements & Ongoing Compliance
Cyber insurance carriers have significantly increased their requirements in recent years.

To maintain coverage and access additional sublimits, the Town must demonstrate ongoing compliance with specific security controls, many of which are directly reflected in the software and practices described in Section II above, including multi-factor authentication, endpoint detection, regular backups, and staff training. The Town’s cyber insurance renews in April of each year. Staff works closely with Marin IT and Bay Cities to ensure the Town continues to meet evolving coverage requirements year over year.

Annual Cyber Risk Assessment & Remediation Plan
As a condition of participation in the Bay Cities cyber insurance program, the Town is required to complete an annual cyber risk assessment administered through Sedgwick, Bay Cities’ contracted Cyber Risk Manager. The assessment provides a structured evaluation of the Town’s cybersecurity posture, identifying gaps and vulnerabilities across a range of control categories.

Each assessment produces a prioritized list of the Town’s top five identified deficiencies.

The assessment must be completed by December 31 of each year. By March 31 of the following year, the Town is required to submit a written plan to Bay Cities outlining how staff intends to address each of the five deficiencies. Importantly, the requirement is to have a plan in place, not necessarily to have completed all five items, as some deficiencies may require funding, policy development, or multi-year implementation. This creates a continuous improvement loop: the Town assesses its posture, identifies gaps, commits to a documented remediation plan, and reports back on progress annually. The 143
Item #: 2.1
Town has now completed three annual assessment cycles since the program began in 2024. The following summarizes findings from all three cycles. 2023–2024 Assessment (First Year)
 Update and Migrate Windows 7 (End of Life January 14, 2020): Status:

Addressed
 Update Password Policy to Include Prohibition on Unencrypted Written Passwords: Status: Addressed (1Password implemented for all staff)  Develop and Implement a Business Continuity Plan (BCP) and/or Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP): Status: Addressed (Cyber Incident Response Plan and Technology Recovery Plan developed and tested October 2025)  Implement SPF, DKIM and/or DMARC to Help Prevent Email Spoofing: Status:

Addressed (Proofpoint)
 Implement Protective DNS (Prevent Connections to Known or Suspected Malicious Sites): Status: Addressed (Proofpoint)
2024–2025 Assessment (Second Year)
 Implement Extended/Managed Detection and Response (XDR/MDR/EDR):

Status: Addressed (Arctic Wolf MDR implemented in FY 2025–2026; upgraded to CrowdStrike Falcon with SIEM in FY 2026–2027)
 Upgrade Windows Server 2019 to a Supported Operating System: Status:

Addressed
 Include Tabletop Exercises in the Existing Incident Response Plan: Status:

Addressed (tabletop conducted October 2025 with Marin IT, Sedgwick, and Town leadership team)
 Implement a Third-Party and Supplier Risk Management Plan: Status: Addressed (carried forward and addressed in 2025–2026 assessment cycle)  Implement Intrusion Detection (IDS) Monitoring: Status: Addressed (covered by CrowdStrike Falcon with SIEM and Proofpoint)
2025–2026 Assessment (Current Year)
This year’s assessment findings are notable in that all five identified deficiencies are policy-related, no hardware or software upgrades are required. Staff is actively working through the remediation plan and coordinating with Marin IT and legal counsel as needed on each item. The Town’s current top five identified deficiencies from the most recent Sedgwick assessment are:
 Implement a Third-Party and Supplier Risk Management Plan: Status: Addressed  Develop and Implement a Payment Card Security Policy: Status: In Progress  Develop and Implement a Portable/Removable Media Policy: Status: In Progress 144
Item #: 2.1
 Develop and Implement a General/Shared Account Policy: Status: In Progress  Develop and Implement a Social Media Policy: Status: Addressed SECTION V: Lessons Learned & Continuous Improvement
In the event of a significant cyber incident, staff would conduct an after-action review once systems are restored. This would include:
 A written report to the Town Council within 30 days of restoration, summarizing what occurred, how it was handled, and any recommended changes  A debrief with Town staff and Marin IT to identify what worked and what should be improved
 Updates to the Cyber Incident Response Plan and Technology Recovery Plan as needed
 Adjustments to staff training based on how the incident occurred  Review of relevant incidents at other California municipalities through MS-ISAC and Bay Cities to inform any updates to the Town’s own plans This continuous improvement approach ensures that the Town’s cybersecurity posture evolves in response to real-world experience. The Sedgwick annual assessment cycle reinforces this loop by providing an independent, structured evaluation each year regardless of whether an incident has occurred.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the receipt of this report. The cybersecurity tools and services described herein are budgeted within the Town’s Information Technology Fund. The Town’s total annual cost for its cybersecurity program, including the Marin IT contract, CrowdStrike Falcon with SIEM, and cyber insurance premiums through Bay Cities, is approximately $440,000.

CEQA
Receipt of an informational report is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act, because it does not involve an activity which has the potential to cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Cal. Pub.

Res. Code § 21065).

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Not applicable.
145
Item #: 2.1

CONCLUSION
The Town of San Anselmo maintains a multi-layered cybersecurity program managed in partnership with Marin IT and supported by cyber insurance coverage through Bay Cities.

This report and the accompanying presentations are intended to give the Town Council a clear picture of the Town’s current cybersecurity posture, how the Town would respond to a cyber incident, and how insurance coverage supports recovery.

Staff recommend that the Council receive and file this report. 146

CYBERSECURITY & IT RESILIENCE
Town Systems, Incident Response & Cyber Insurance Coverage Town Council Regular Meeting | August 25, 2026
147

WHY THIS REPORT

COUNCIL DIRECTION
Requested by Councilmember Schlesinger and the full Council: how would the Town respond to a cyber attack?

REPORT FOCUS
The Town's cybersecurity environment, incident response protocols, and cyber insurance coverage.

PRESENTING ALONGSIDE STAFF
Two key Town partners join tonight's presentation; see right for details.

MARIN IT
The Town's contracted managed IT services provider
for approximately 20 years, using a regional model
shared with a number of Marin County jurisdictions.

BCJPIA
Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority: the
Town's risk insurance pool, through which the Town
maintains its cyber insurance coverage.
2 148

A MULTI-LAYERED DEFENSE
Layer | What It Does
Perimeter Defense
Proofpoint filters malicious email before it reaches staff Identity & Access
Cisco Duo MFA + 1Password stop stolen passwords cold
Endpoint Protection
CrowdStrike + ConnectWise cover all 73 user devices
Layer | What It Does
Network Visibility
Auvik monitoring, Qualys quarterly scans, and CISA external scans 24/7 Detection & Response
CrowdStrike Falcon with SIEM: SOC monitoring & audit trail Recovery
Veeam / 11:11 immutable backups: supports faster data restoration 12 integrated tools, organized into 6 defense layers.
3 149

DATA BACKUP & TESTING
Quarterly restoration testing: most recent test completed June 2026 Microsoft 365
Data
Frequency Immediately and daily
Retention 30 days
Storage Cloud (Veeam), with a second copy via 11:11
Tyler Finance
& Local Files
Frequency Continuous and daily
Retention 30 days
Storage On-premise and cloud (Veeam / 11:11)
Immutable = backups cannot be encrypted or deleted by ransomware; locked from modification. 4 150

ESTIMATED RECOVERY TIMES BY SYSTEM
24 48 48
72 0
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
Microsoft 365
(email, Teams, SharePoint)
Other Cloud Apps
(permitting, agenda mgmt)
Local File Folders
(on-premise shares)
Tyler Finance
(on-premise system)
Hours
5 151

THE HUMAN LAYER
Metric What It Means
73 Town users protected
Endpoint coverage across all devices
80% KnowBe4 training completion
Encouraged, not yet mandatory
~1 / month Average phishing-simulation failures
Feb–Jun 2026, 5 rounds, 73 users
50% Phish Alert Button adoption
Room to grow staff reporting habits
These are controlled, staff-run exercises, not actual security incidents. 6 152

INCIDENT RESPONSE READINESS
Incident Response Team
◆ Town Manager ◆ Assistant Town Manager / Town Librarian ◆ Town Clerk ◆ Community Engagement Coordinator
◆ Senior Accountant/Finance Supervisor (BCJPIA Alternate) ◆ Finance & Admin Services Director (BCJPIA Primary) ◆ Marin IT
Plans & Detection
◆ Cyber Incident Response Plan & Technology Recovery Plan: living documents, last reviewed Oct 21, 2025 ◆ Tabletop exercise conducted Oct 21, 2025 with Marin IT, BCJPIA, and Town leadership ◆ Detection via CrowdStrike SOC, vendor alerts, and MS-ISAC; no confirmed incident to date 7 ◆ Management Analyst
153

COMMUNICATIONS CONTINUITY
Channel Details
Starlink Business
Satellite internet (Budgeted) Independent of fiber & ISP infrastructure Satellite Phones (2)
Budgeted Voice channel independent of cell towers
Key Staff Contacts
Active Personal cell numbers maintained in the Incident Response Plan Marin Emergency Radio Network
Active Dedicated channel with police & fire partners
8 154

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR RESIDENTS
Service What It Means
Online Payments & Permits Cloud-hosted portals generally remain accessible during a network-only incident. In a broader outage, staff can accept payments and process requests manually.

Town Website Hosted externally and would remain operational in most incident scenarios, allowing staff to post updates and service advisories.

Phone & In-Person Service Town Hall remains open for in-person service. Starlink and satellite phones keep staff able to communicate and assist residents.

The Town's first priority in any incident: maintain public-facing services and communicate transparently with residents about disruptions and expected restoration timelines via notices from the Town Manager’s Newsletter. 9 155

CYBER INSURANCE COVERAGE
Coverage Layer Amount Notes
Layer 1: APIP Cyber Liability $2,000,000 per member ($85M program aggregate) Base policy underwritten by Beazley, all BCJPIA members Layer 2: Excess Cyber Insurance $3,000,000 per member / $5,000,000 policy aggregate
All BCJPIA members, since July 1, 2020; doubles key
sublimits
Layer 3: BBR Endorsement
$250,000 added Legal/Forensics/Crisis coverage,
plus notification costs, outside Layer 1 & 2
aggregates
San Anselmo purchases BBR; also lowers key retentions
Through BCJPIA and Beazley, via the APIP (Alliant Property Insurance Program) arrangement, managed by broker Alliant, for more than ten years. 10 156
WHEN AN INCIDENT OCCURS: CLAIMS PROCESS
Breach Coordinator: Town Manager or designee, primary liaison with Beazley, outside vendors, and Alliant Step Detail

1. Notify Beazley Immediately For any suspected breach, extortion threat, or system failure. Alliant notified simultaneously.

2. First 24 Hours: Secure, Mitigate,
Coordinate
Town IT secures affected systems and preserves evidence. A Beazley Cyber Claims Manager or Coverage Counsel makes contact within 24 hours.

3. Expert Resources Activated Beazley arranges Privacy Counsel, Digital Forensics specialists, and Notification & Call Centre services at favorable rates.
11 157
ANNUAL RISK ASSESSMENT: 3-YEAR TRACK RECORD
Assessment Year Status Notes
2023–2024 5 of 5 addressed First assessment cycle: foundational items (MFA, backups, response plan) 2024–2025 5 of 5 addressed MDR/EDR upgrade, tabletop exercises, intrusion detection 2025–2026 (Current) 2 of 5 addressed Remaining 3 in progress, all policy-related, no hardware/software upgrades required Administered annually by Sedgwick, Bay Cities' contracted Cyber Risk Manager. 12 158

LESSONS LEARNED & CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
After a significant incident, staff conducts a structured after-action review:

Step Action
Report Written report to Town Council within 30 days of restoration Debrief Debrief with Town staff and Marin IT: what worked, what to improve Update Plans Updates to the Cyber Incident Response Plan and Technology Recovery Plan Training Adjustments to staff training based on how the incident occurred 13 159

FISCAL IMPACT & RECOMMENDATION
$440,000 Total annual cybersecurity program cost: Marin IT contract, CrowdStrike Falcon with SIEM, and cyber insurance premiums through BCJPIA. Budgeted within the Town's Information Technology Fund. No fiscal impact associated with receipt of this informational report.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
◆ That the Town Council receive this report as an informational item and receive presentations from Marin IT and BCJPIA on the Town's cybersecurity posture, incident response protocols, and cyber insurance coverage. 14 160
QUESTIONS?
161
Item #: 2.2

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item #: 2.2
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Presentation by the Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority
FROM: Jeff Zuba, Finance & Administrative Services Director RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the presentation from the Executive Director of the Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority.

BACKGROUND
The Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority (Bay Cities) is a joint powers authority formed in 1986 that provides pooled risk management services to member public agencies located within approximately 100 miles of Emeryville, California. Bay Cities' current membership includes fifteen cities, four towns, one police authority, and one fire authority.

Bay Cities was established to help member agencies:
• Stabilize the cost of risk and protect public assets through shared, self-insured risk pools.
• Reduce the frequency and severity of losses through effective risk management and loss-prevention programs.
• Jointly purchase and access administrative and professional services, including claims adjusting, risk management consulting, data processing, actuarial services, accounting, and legal services related to the risk-sharing program.

Bay Cities has met the professional standards established by the California Association of Joint Powers Authorities (CAJPA) in the areas of governance, finance, claims control, safety and loss prevention, excess coverage, and risk management, and holds CAJPA's highest designation, “Accreditation with Excellence.”
The Town of San Anselmo has been a member of Bay Cities since 1996, and currently obtains its liability, workers' compensation, property, auto physical damage, employment 162
Item #: 2.2
practices liability, and cyber-related risk-pooling coverage and services through Bay Cities.

DISCUSSION
The Executive Director of Bay Cities has been invited to present to the San Anselmo Town Council at tonight's meeting. The Town Council is discussing the Town's cyber coverage this evening, and staff thought it would be beneficial for the Council to also hear about the Town's other coverages and areas of participation with Bay Cities at the same time. Bay Cities' current programs include:
• Pooled Liability Program: General Liability, Auto Liability, and Errors & Omissions coverage in excess of each member's Self-Insured Retention (SIR), up to $1,000,000 per occurrence, with additional excess coverage above that level provided through the California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities (CARMA).

Acclamation Insurance Management Services administers claims. Member SIRs across the pool range from $5,000 to $500,000; the Town's current SIR is $10,000. • Workers' Compensation Program: Pooled coverage for workers' compensation and employer's liability losses, with Bay Cities retaining the first $1,000,000 of each loss and sharing risk among members above members' individual retentions.

Innovative Claim Solutions administers claims. The Town's current SIR is $150,000.
• Pooled Property Program: All-risk coverage for members' buildings, contents, and vehicles, generally on a replacement-cost basis, from the member's deductible up to the Alliant Property Insurance Program (APIP) deductible of $250,000, including boiler and machinery breakdown coverage. The Town's current deductible is $10,000.
• Auto Physical Damage (APD) Program: Risk-sharing coverage for comprehensive and collision damage exceeding $1,000, up to the APIP deductible. • Employment Practices Liability (EPL) Coverage: Primary-layer coverage up to $1,000,000 per occurrence obtained through the Employment Risk Management Authority (ERMA), along with related loss-prevention services. • Safety and Risk Control Services: Occupational safety and risk control consulting, including customized risk assessments and an annual Safety and Risk Control Service Plan adopted by the Bay Cities Board of Directors. • Cybersecurity Resources: Tools and best practices to help protect member agencies' systems and data from cybersecurity threats.
• Parametric Earthquake Coverage: A new program for the 2026/27 policy year; the Town is purchasing $4,000,000 in limits.

Bay Cities contracts with Sedgwick as its self-insured program administrator, handling day-to-day underwriting, financial management, claims, litigation, and general risk management functions on Bay Cities' behalf. Governance is provided by a Board of Directors made up of member-agency representatives, supported by an Executive Committee, a Nominating Committee, and committee/liaison seats connected to CARMA, ERMA, and the Local Agency Workers' Compensation Excess (LAWCX) programs. 163
Item #: 2.2
This item is intended to give the Council a current overview of Bay Cities and the Town's ongoing participation in Bay Cities. No changes to the Town's membership or coverage are being proposed at this time.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the receipt of this report. This is only an informational presentation. The Town's annual contributions and premiums for its Bay Cities coverage programs are addressed through the Town's regular budget process and are not affected by this item.

CEQA
Receipt of an informational report is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act, because it does not involve an activity which has the potential to cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Cal. Pub.

Res. Code § 21065).

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Not applicable.

Attachments
Attachment 1 Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority 101 Presentation 164
Presentation to
Town of San
Anselmo
Town Council
August 25, 2026
165
BCJPIA was created in 1986 with the
purpose of:
• Reducing the amount and
frequency of losses
• Sharing the risk of self- insured losses
• Jointly purchasing and
providing administrative
and other services
• San Anselmo joined
BCJPIA in 1996
The Bay Cities Joint Powers
Insurance Authority provides
cost-effective, fiscally sound,
liability, workers’
compensation, property, and
other lines of coverage for
Member Entities.
166
BCJPIA Members
City of Albany City of Berkeley
City of Brisbane Central Marin Fire Authority
Central Marin Police Authority Town of Corte Madera
City of Emeryville Town of Fairfax
City of Larkspur Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department
City of Los Altos City of Menlo Park
City of Mill Valley City of Monte Sereno
City of Novato City of Piedmont
City of Pleasanton Town of Redwood City
Town of San Anselmo Town of Tiburon
City of Union City
167
Major Advantages of BCJPIA
• Shared cost of risk among similar, like-minded entities • Member controlled – governance, coverage, return of excess contributions
• Rates based upon actual claims experience of members and not profit driven
• Improved risk control services tailored to members’ needs • Better claims management services
• Investment income retained by JPA
168
Potential Disadvantages of a JPA
• Ultimate cost is not guaranteed
• Members subject to assessments
• Members jointly and severally liable
• Not an insurance company - requires active participation • Governing Board with fiduciary responsibilities
169
Board of Directors/Committees
• Board of Directors
• 1 Representative and 1
Alternate for each member
• Executive Committee
• 7 Members
• Nominating Committee
• 3 Members
• CARMA Representatives
• 1 Representative and 1
Alternate
• ERMA Representatives
• 1 Representative and 1
Alternate
• LAWCX Representatives
• 1 Representative and 1
Alternate
170
BCJPIA Programs and
Structure
171
Liability Program
CARMA

GROUP SHARED SELF-INSURANCE, RE-INSURANCE, & EXCESS INSURANCE $1,000,000 - $44,500,000
BCJPIA

GROUP SHARED SELF-INSURANCE
MEMBER SIRs - $1,000,000
$500,000
$350,000
$250,000 MEMBER SIRs
$100,000
$50,000
$25,000
$10,000
$5,000
• Created in 1986/87
• Currently 21 Members
• San Anselmo SIR - $10,000
172
Workers’ Compensation Program

LAWCX/PRISM

GROUP SHARED SELF-INSURANCE, RE-INSURANCE, & EXCESS INSURANCE $1,000,000 – Statutory Limits
BCJPIA

GROUP SHARED SELF-INSURANCE
MEMBER SIRs - $1,000,000
$500,000 MEMBER SIRs
$350,000
$250,000
$150,000
• Created in 2002/03
• 16 Members
• San Anselmo SIR - $150,000
173
Property Program
APIP

PURCHASED INSURANCE
$250,000 - $1,000,000,000
BCJPIA

GROUP SHARED SELF-INSURANCE
MEMBER SIRs - $250,000
MEMBER SIRs
$50,000

$10,000
• Created in 2003/04
• 19 Members
• San Anselmo SIR - $10,000
174
Parametric Earthquake Coverage
• New for 2026/27
• San Anselmo purchasing $4M in limits
• San Anselmo SIR - $10,000
• Coverage is based on event, not damage
• Shaking intensity is the deductible
• Scale of payments is based on shaking intensity
• Funds are received quickly, no loss adjusting
• Town can pay for any expenses related to event (ex:
public safety overtime, equipment, supplies)
175
176
Sample Event and Payout
177

THANK YOU
178
Item #: 2.3

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item #: 2.3
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Response to Marin Civil Grand Jury Report: MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight
Need for Governance Changes
FROM: Chantel Walker, Vice Mayor, San Anselmo & MCE
Director
Bridget Wipfler, Climate Action Coordinator CDD
Dave Donery, Town Manager, San Anselmo
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the Town of San Anselmo’s responses to the Marin County Civil Grand Jury report titled “MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes” and authorize the Mayor to sign the response form.

BACKGROUND
California civil grand juries are authorized to investigate and report on the operations, accounts, records, and practices of cities or joint powers agencies and to make recommendations they deem appropriate (Cal. Penal Code section 925a). No later than 90 days after the grand jury submits a final report regarding a public agency, the agency’s governing body must respond to the presiding judge of the superior court regarding the findings and recommendations that pertain to matters under its control (Cal. Penal Code section 933(c)). The Town’s response is due September 13, 2026.

On June 16, 2026, the 2025–2026 Marin County Civil Grand Jury issued the report titled “MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes” (Attachment 1). MCE, formerly known as Marin Clean Energy, is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) composed of 38 member jurisdictions in Marin, Contra Costa, Napa, and Solano counties, including the Town of San Anselmo. MCE was California’s first Community Choice Aggregator (CCA) and serves approximately 1.8 million residential and business customers through more than 600,000 customer accounts. Its annual revenue exceeds $840 million.

As a CCA, MCE purchases electricity on behalf of its customers and establishes generation rates, while Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) continues to own and 179
Item #: 2.3
maintain the electric grid, deliver electricity, and provide billing and related customer services.

The Grand Jury initiated its investigation after MCE’s energy expenses increased by approximately $200 million (25%) during fiscal year 2024–2025. The report raises concerns regarding Board governance, financial and energy procurement oversight, transparency, and compliance with internal controls. Among other conclusions, the Grand Jury found that the Board has not taken a sufficiently active governance role and that management had, at times, been insufficiently transparent with the Board.

The report contains 14 findings and 13 recommendations. MCE is required to respond to all findings and recommendations directed to it. The Marin County Board of Supervisors and each Marin city and town, including San Anselmo, are required to respond to Findings F4 and F5 and Recommendations R5 and R6. Jurisdictions in Contra Costa, Napa, and Solano counties are invited to respond to the same findings and recommendations.

The proposed response in Attachment 2 constitutes the Town of San Anselmo’s formal response to the findings and recommendations directed to the Town.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Staff and Vice Mayor Walker reviewed the Grand Jury Report and prepared the proposed responses in Attachment 2 as required by the Grand Jury. Findings, F4 and F5, and, recommendations R5 and R6, require Marin County jurisdictions, including San Anselmo, to respond by September 13, 2026.

The proposed response agrees with Findings F4, F5, and Recommendation R5, and partially agrees with Recommendation R6. Recommendation R5 has been the documented approach in San Anselmo through the Town's practice of appointing both a primary representative and an alternate to ensure consistent representation at MCE Board meetings. The proposed response partially agrees with Recommendation R6 as it is a strong starting point to recognize that financial and climate/energy expertise are important considerations when appointing an MCE Board representative but concludes that they should be considered alongside governance experience, institutional knowledge, state compliance, contracting and continuity of service, rather than serving as the sole appointment criterion.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with receiving and submitting the Town’s response.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
180
Item #: 2.3
Approval of the Town’s response is an administrative action and does not involve a land use decision. The action is therefore not subject to a General Plan consistency determination.

CEQA AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CONSISTENCY
Approval and submission of the Town’s response is an organizational and administrative activity that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5). The action does not conflict with the Town’s Climate Action Plan.

ATTACHMENT
Attachment 1- Marin County Civil Grand Jury Report: “MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes” (June 16, 2026)
Attachment 2- Responses to Grand Jury Report
181
2025-2026 Marin County Civil Grand Jury
MCE, Marin Clean Energy:

A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for
Governance Changes
June 16, 2026

SUMMARY
MCE (Marin Clean Energy), one of California’s 25 not-for-profit renewable energy entities, provides electricity to most households and businesses in Marin County, and in three nearby counties, as an alternative to electricity provided by Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E).

Under state law, customers are automatically signed up with MCE, unless they affirmatively take steps to “opt out” in favor of PG&E.

At the height of the electricity cost market in the fall of 2024, MCE entered into expensive contracts that eventually increased its energy expenses over the prior year by about $200 million — more than 25 percent. This issue prompted the Civil Grand Jury to investigate MCE. We found a Board of Directors that rarely asserted its responsibility of governance, and management that appeared to be taking advantage of this situation. We also found that controls for contract approval and other internal processes were not being followed. The investigation concluded with a number of key findings, some of which we summarize here:
(1) MCE’s Board of Directors has not taken a sufficiently active role in the important decisions affecting the agency — and has failed to systematically review its policies, performance, and future strategy.
(2) By delegating to the CEO, the Board’s approval authority over hiring of MCE’s General Legal Counsel, the Board has lost access to adequate independent legal advice when it is needed.
(3) The energy contracts at the heart of MCE’s business are complex — and Board members face a considerable challenge to understand the relationship between those contracts and the renewability of the electricity that MCE provides to its customers. (4) On multiple occasions, MCE management has been insufficiently transparent with its Board.

Our report offers recommendations addressing these and related findings. We briefly summarize some of our primary recommendations:
(1) MCE’s Board should act as a governing board, by deepening its oversight, and exercising primary authority over matters such as energy procurement decisions, hiring, and budget plans.
182
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 2 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes (2) The Board should reinstate approval authority for hiring of both CEO and General Legal Counsel, and have approval authority for hiring of all other top-level management personnel.
(3) The Board should address its composition and effectiveness, and related issues in its planned “governance assessment” — a laudable ongoing Board-initiated project that is expected to be completed after publication of this Grand Jury report. (4) The Board should review the value of certain costly contracts that, some knowledgeable critics assert, serve primarily to allow MCE to claim a higher renewable (i.e., “greener”) Power Content Label.

The Grand Jury applauds MCE for pioneering the Community Choice Aggregator (CCA) model, and for considerable success in advancing renewable energy. We acknowledge that management faces unusual challenges in working with a large Board composed of elected members, who often lack significant financial and energy experience. We also recognize that our recommendations in this report are broad and consequential. Yet we believe these significant actions and operating changes are necessary if the Board is to properly govern this more than $840 million public organization (approaching the size of Marin County’s entire annual budget1) and position MCE for continued success. Without the proposed modifications to its current operating regulations and organizational documents, we are concerned the Board will not be able to provide needed oversight of MCE’s future performance.

BACKGROUND
A Local Option for Electricity Service: “Community Choice Aggregation” In 2002 the California Legislature amended the Public Utilities Code2to provide for “Community Choice Aggregators” (CCAs) — allowing counties and cities to buy electricity and sell it to their residents and businesses. CCAs can negotiate electricity contracts with power providers that focus on “clean” energy sources. CCAs can then offer purchased power to local subscribers as an alternative to electricity provided by an “Investor-Owned Utility” (IOU) such as Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). Each CCA relies on its area IOU’s existing power lines, metering, and billing systems to deliver and charge for the electricity supplied by the CCA.3 The same 2002 legislation made a local CCA the default electricity provider for all new customers within that CCA’s service area, but permits customers to “opt out,” and so retain electricity generated by the local IOU if the customer wishes.4
1 See News Release, “Board Approves $865.8 Million Budget for 2025–26,” County of Marin website, https://www.marincounty.gov/news-releases/board-approves-8658-million-budget-2025-26. All urls cited in this report are current as of May 15, 2026.
2 Assembly Bill No. 117 (Sept. 24, 2002), amending Cal. Public Utilities Code, §§ 218.3, 366, 394, and 394.25; and adding §§ 331.1, 366.2, and 381.1. See generally J.R. DeShazo et al., “The Promises and Challenges of Community Choice Aggregation in California” (2017) UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, https://innovation.luskin.ucla.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2019/03/The_Promises_and_Challenges_of_Community_Choice_Aggregation_in_CA.pdf (describing the nature, emergence, and benefits of CCAs). 3 Each IOU also continues to provide all natural gas service. 4 Cal. Public Utilities Code, § 366.2, subd. (a), (2) & (3). 183
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 3 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes Marin Clean Energy (MCE)
Marin Clean Energy (MCE) was formed under a Joint Powers Agreement in 20085as a not-forprofit entity, and became California’s first CCA in 2010.6 Its vision then, as now, has been to
“lead California to an equitable, clean, affordable, and reliable energy economy by serving as a model for community-based renewable energy, energy efficiency, and cutting-edge, clean-tech products and programs.”7 MCE began with a small staff, a management team that included cofounder and current Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Dawn Weisz, and an eight-member governing Board of Directors composed of one member from each town or city council, elected in each of Marin’s originally participating seven towns and cities, and one Marin County Supervisor.8 Today there are 25 CCAs in California, serving more than 15 million customers in over 200 California cities and counties,9subject to some regulation by the state. 10 Other notable
CCAs include AVA Community Energy (serving Alameda County, and some cities in the Central Valley),11 Silicon Valley Clean Energy (serving 13 South Bay communities), 12 and
Peninsula Clean Energy (serving 22 San Mateo County communities and the City of Los Banos).13
In the years since its formation MCE has grown to include all eleven Marin cities and towns, the unincorporated parts of Marin County, and the counties of Contra Costa, Napa, and Solano, as well as numerous cities within those counties.14 MCE currently provides electricity to 38 5 MCE, “Formation Documents” / “Joint Powers Agreement (pdf) — Updated April 17, 2025” https://mcecleanenergy.org/key-documents/. The current parties to the JPA are described post, fn. 14. 6 MCE, “Formation Documents” / “MCE Implementation Plan (pdf) — Revised January 2013” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Marin-Energy-Authority-Community-Choice-AggregationImplementation-Plan-And-Statement-of-Intent-Revised_012213.pdf. 7 MCE, “Our Purpose” https://mcecleanenergy.org/about/. 8 MCE, “Celebrating 15 Years of Clean Energy, Climate Action, and Community Power, Impact Report 2025,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025_MCE_Impact-Report_111325-1.pdf p. 6. 9 California Community Choice Association (CalCCA), https://cal-cca.org/about/; MCE, “What is Community Choice Aggregation?” https://mcecleanenergy.org/faq/.
10 See, for example, hearings held by the Cal. Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communications (Aug. 23, 2017) “The Changing Electricity Landscape: The Growth of Community Choice Aggregators (CCAs),” https://www.senate.ca.gov/media/senate-energy-utilities-communications-committee-20170823?format=video; Cal.

Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communications (Mar. 19, 2019) “The Changing Electricity Landscape:

The Need for a New Regulatory Approach?” https://www.senate.ca.gov/media/senate-energy-utilitiescommunications-committee-20190319?format=video.

See also, e.g., Senate Bill. No. 155 (Oct. 2, 2019), amending Cal. Pub. Utilities Code, §§ 399.13, 399.16, 454.5 & 454.52 (strengthening oversight of CCAs by the California Public Utilities Commission; requiring CCAs and other load-serving entities to strictly adhere to California renewable energy and grid adequacy requirements). 11 Ava Community Energy, https://avaenergy.org/.
12 Silicon Valley Clean Energy, https://svcleanenergy.org/. 13 Peninsula Clean Energy, https://peninsulacleanenergy.com. 14 MCE, “Celebrating 15 Years of Clean Energy, Climate Action, and Community Power, Impact Report 2025,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025_MCE_Impact-Report_111325-1.pdf, at pdf pp. 7–11.

As of 2026, there are 38 parties to the Joint Powers Agreement (“Marin Energy Authority Joint Powers Agreement,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/MCE_JPA-Agreement_38_CommunitiesUpdated_4.17.25.pdf). 184
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 4 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes communities, with 34 elected local government officials serving on its Board of Directors.15 Reflecting this increased coverage, Marin Clean Energy now simply refers to itself as “MCE.” The Grand Jury supports MCE’s mission and wishes for it to succeed. MCE’s contribution to clean energy, climate action, and community power is substantial and well documented.

According to MCE’s 2025 Impact Report, over the past 15 years MCE’s clean energy investments have resulted in 1085 MW of new renewable energy capacity built or under development, and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 500,000 mega-tons of CO2e. To support its customers financially and ensure that all customers can benefit from a green economy, MCE has provided $80 million in bill savings and discount programs, credited $12 million to low-income customers through the MCE Cares Credit, issued $19 million in customer rebates for EVs and EV charging, and distributed $57 million for energy efficiency upgrades. To prioritize underserved populations, MCE has awarded $100,000 in community partnership support to help residents and businesses become more climate-ready; supported more than 80 underserved youth in gaining hands-on training in green construction, electrification and energy efficiency through its NextGen Trades Academy; and empowered underserved communities in Concord, Richmond, San Rafael, and Vallejo to help shape the future of transportation.16 Caption: MCE Factsheet. Source: MCE Impact Report 2025, https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2025/12/2025_MCE_Impact-Report_111325-1.pdf, at pdf p. 4. 15 MCE, “Board of Directors,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/board-of-directors/. Consistent with MCE’s organizational documents, the 34-member Board consists of representatives from the 38 communities, with one Board member representing Napa county plus four cities within that county. 16 MCE, “Celebrating 15 Years of Clean Energy, Climate Action, and Community Power, Impact Report 2025,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025_MCE_Impact-Report_111325-1.pdf at pdf pp. 4–15. 185
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 5 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes MCE’s annual revenue is currently more than $840 million.17 It provides electricity for more than 600,000 customer accounts and 1.8 million residents and businesses in the four-member counties.18 MCE currently has a staff of more than 120, and a management team of three.19 The staff is diverse and the agency looks to be welcoming of all backgrounds. About sixty percent of the employees are women.20 By all accounts, the agency appears to be a top place to work, and a place where staff can succeed.21
MCE explains that it purchases electricity “mostly … from nonpolluting, renewable sources such as solar, wind, geothermal, hydroelectric, and bioenergy. The projects that produce our electricity are located in California, the Pacific Northwest, and Colorado. The exact proportion of each varies with time, based on demand and availability. For example, MCE may use a higher proportion of hydroelectric energy during the spring and summer months when winter runoff generates more power at affordable prices.”22 MCE procures electricity by entering into “shortand long-term contracts with a variety of power suppliers to meet the energy needs of our customers.”23
MCE offers two main electricity supply programs. One is called “Light Green,” which aims to provide electricity that is sourced at least 60 percent from “eligible renewables” such as solar and wind (along with biomass & biowaste, geothermal, and “eligible hydroelectric”). The other is called “Deep Green,” which is advertised as electricity derived entirely from solar and wind.24 In 2024 MCE exceeded its Light Green 60 percent goal, supplying to its customers 69 percent renewable electricity under that program.25
Ultimately, MCE is an energy trader, purchasing and selling electricity. At one end, MCE purchases power in an energy market in competition with other CCAs and other energy traders.

But unlike most energy traders, MCE does not both buy and sell in the same energy market. The endpoint for MCE electricity is with rate paying customers, as MCE sells its electricity in competition with PG&E. In FY 2024–25 MCE spent nearly $200 million more than the previous 17 Id. at pdf p. 5.
18 MCE, “What is MCE?” https://mcecleanenergy.org/faq/. 19 MCE, “Meet our Team,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/our-team/. MCE lists its three executives as the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Customer Officer — excluding its Chief Financial Officer from the Executive Leadership team.
20 Ibid.
21 “The San Francisco Bay Area Top Workplaces 2025,” https://topworkplaces.com/award/bayarea/2025/35-149/ (listing MCE as No. 12 of companies with 35–149 employees). 22 MCE, “Where does MCE get its electricity?” https://mcecleanenergy.org/faq/. 23 MCE, “How does MCE procure power?” https://mcecleanenergy.org/faq/. 24 MCE, “Compare Rates and Choose What Works Best for You,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/compare-rates-andoptions/ (highlighting the “renewable” percentages for “Light Green” and “Deep Green,” respectively). As explained in an MCE chart regarding its “2024 Power Content Mix,” the legal term, “eligible renewables” includes the sources listed in the text above, but excludes electricity sourced from coal, “large hydroelectric,” natural gas, and nuclear plants. The same chart characterizes PG&E’s electricity as sourced 63 percent from “nuclear” (and 12 percent from “large hydroelectric” — yet none from coal), which, in combination with other lesser sources, results in PG&E’s “eligible renewables” figure of only 23 percent. MCE, “Where Your Energy Comes From” / “Ensuring Transparency” https://mcecleanenergy.org/energy-sources/. 25 MCE, “Compare Rates and Choose What Works Best for You,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/compare-rates-andoptions/. 186
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 6 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes year on one-to-five-year energy contracts, while prices were at a peak. In light of these high-cost purchases, MCE must include these high costs in its rates, until these expensive power contracts are complete. In other words, MCE’s rates to customers are higher than they could have been without its expensive purchases, and it is less able to compete with PG&E because of those purchases.

Why did MCE purchase these contracts that created a $200 million year-over-year variance, while other CCAs in the same market did not make similar purchases leading to similar variances? The answer to this question requires a “deep dive” into how MCE operates, and examination of details about how energy is purchased and delivered. But even as we examined power purchases, we found irregularities concerning other operational details. Our investigation identified serious concerns regarding governance, oversight, transparency, and adherence to internal controls.

Public-Interest Watchdog Critiques of MCE — Followed by a Series of Articles Published in The Marin Independent Journal
Beginning in the Fall of 2025, several state and local public-interest watchdog groups — including Clean Coalition, Marin Conservation League, and Marin’s Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers — submitted public comments to MCE, verbally at Board meetings and in writing, critical of MCE’s recent financial performance and governance.26 We will address these critiques, and public comments by others, in the “Discussion” section of this report below.

Subsequently the Marin Independent Journal published a series of four articles examining MCE in late October 2025. The initial article described the efforts of some MCE Board members to encourage more transparency and accountability.27 It reported that although most of MCE’s Board members “had confidence in management … for the second year in a row, MCE’s expenses differed from its budget by more than $100 million, its auditors reported. Total expenses increased by $200 million from the year before — creating an operating loss.”28 The final series article observed that several former MCE directors had commented that the Board’s large size “is not conducive to detailed discussion.”29 The article quoted a former Board member — an accountant who was on the Board during its first decade, when there were only 12 members: “ ‘But even then, I wasn’t the only one who felt like the Board … had absolutely no experience in the utility business, which is a complicated business, and we had no choice but to rely on what management tells us.’ ”30 That former member concluded: “ ‘There were certain 26 Beginning in 2025, such public comments have been posted on MCE’s website on a page titled “Written Public Comment Submissions,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/board-meetings/#public-comments. 27 Steven Rosenfeld, “Friction at MCE, Part 1: Calls for financial reform, transparency” (Oct. 25, 2025) Marin Independent Journal, https://www.marinij.com/2025/10/25/friction-at-mce-part-1-calls-for-financial-reformtransparency/. 28 Ibid.
29 Steven Rosenfeld, “Friction at MCE, Part 4: Management, allies block governance reforms” (Oct. 28, 2025) Marin Independent Journal, https://www.marinij.com/2025/10/28/friction-at-mce-part-4-management-allies-blockgovernance-reforms/. 30 Ibid.
187
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 7 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes things we could comment on, but the basic business was just oblivious to us…. There was a strong feeling that the Board should hire some outside advisers who reported to the Board and not to management.’ ”31
In the ensuing months periodic follow-up articles have been published in the Marin Independent Journal, reporting on MCE Board and committee meetings.32 Various interested persons and groups have continued to submit critical and constructive comments in the form of letters and memoranda, which MCE has continued to post on its website.33 In late 2025, MCE’s Board voted to create a standing finance committee.34 It also voted in early 2026 to undertake a “governance assessment,” the scope of which will be defined after the Board receives and evaluates responses to its request for proposals, which were due by the end of April, 2026.35 Clearly, this governance assessment project will not commence until well after June, 2026 — subsequent to the end of the current Marin County Civil Grand Jury term.

APPROACH
We reviewed material posted on MCE’s website (https://mcecleanenergy.org/), including hundreds of pages of meeting packets, dozens of hours of Board of Directors and related committee meeting videos, along with financial, formation, and policy documents, and written public comments. We also reviewed the websites of other peer CCAs, and other sources and professional articles concerning CCAs.

We also researched California legislation creating and governing CCAs, and related legal constraints on public entities by the Brown Act, California’s open public meetings law.36 We conducted approximately 30 hours of interviews with 14 persons including: (1) members of MCE’s Board of Directors; (2) representatives of watchdog entities who have commented on MCE’s operations; (3) members of the public who have submitted comments to MCE; and (4) representatives of MCE’s management.
31 Ibid., italics added.
32 Responding to the series of Marin IJ articles, MCE posted a document in November 2025 that purported to clarify and correct asserted IJ “misinformation”: https://mcecleanenergy.org/fact-or-fiction-on-the-friction-at-mce/. (Found by Google search.) Although MCE has promoted complimentary media coverage on its “In The News” website section, and directly linked to such articles, MCE has posted only responses — but with no links — to Marin IJ articles.
33 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/board-meetings/#public-comments. 34 MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors November 20, 2025 Minutes,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/01/MCE-Board-Meeting-Minutes-November_2025.pdf, item 8. 35 MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors January 15, 2026 Minutes,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/03/MCE-Board-Meeting-Minutes-January_2026.pdf, at pdf p. 4 (item 8); MCE, “Open Solicitations” / “MCE Solicitations” / “Governance Assessment Services RFP,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/03/2026-01-RFP-for-Governance-Assessment-Services.pdf (“MCE … seeks a qualified organization or individual(s) to assess MCE’s governance structure and practices and develop recommendations based upon the findings”). Id. at pdf p. 1.
36 Cal. Gov. Code, §§ 54950–54963.
188
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 8 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes In our investigation of specific missteps that have recently come to light at MCE, we realized problems arose from broader issues about organizational governance, and operational transparency. We subsequently focused our inquiry on underlying issues that, we believe, led to those missteps.

Throughout our investigation we continued to monitor and review postings (meeting packets and videos; public comment documents, etc.) published on MCE’s website, and those of some comparable peer CCAs. We also continued to monitor ongoing articles, editorials, and letters to the editor appearing in the Marin Independent Journal and other publications. However, because of the timing of this jury’s one-year term, and necessary review of this report prior to publication, we ended our investigation on May 15, 2026.

DISCUSSION

1. MCE Board Members Disagree About the Scope of Their Governance Role Soon after we initiated our investigation, we found a basic disagreement amongst the Board members about their Board responsibilities. Although some members have been active in requesting information from management and offering analysis and strategy suggestions, others felt this was beyond their scope and preferred to defer to management. We reviewed MCE’s foundational documents to determine what was originally anticipated for these responsibilities.

The function and authority of MCE’s Board of Directors is described in its governing documents. MCE’s Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) provides: “The governing body of the Authority shall be a Board of Directors (‘Board’) consisting of one director for each Party [county and municipalities] that “meets at regular intervals to provide the overall management and guidance for MCE.”37 Consistent with the JPA, MCE’s Revised Community Choice Aggregation Implementation Plan and Statement of Intent (Plan) specifies that the Board’s primary duties are to “establish program policies, set rates and provide policy direction to the Executive Officer, who has general responsibility for program operations, consistent with policies established by the Board.”38 In this report, we refer to the Board’s roles and duties set forth in these foundational documents, when exercised, as “governance.” Governance defines the structural framework — rules, practices, and processes — that enables effective corporate oversight and ensures transparency. Governance also determines how a board of directors supervises management, mitigates risks, and discloses information to stakeholders, fostering trust and accountability.39
37 MCE, “Formation Documents” / “Joint Powers Agreement (pdf) — Updated April 17, 2025” https://mcecleanenergy.org/key-documents/, art. 4, § 4.1. 38 MCE, “Formation Documents” / “MCE Implementation Plan (pdf) — Revised January 2013” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Marin-Energy-Authority-Community-Choice-AggregationImplementation-Plan-And-Statement-of-Intent-Revised_012213.pdf, at pdf p. 11 (“Organizational Overview”). 39 See, e.g., Continuing Education of the Bar (CEB) (Feb. 21, 2025), https://ceb.com/blog/corporate-governancecompliance-in-house-governance-strategies/. 189
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 9 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes In light of these foundational documents, we conclude that the MCE Board is expected to exercise an active governance role.

Our interviews with Board members, together with our review of relevant MCE documents and videos of Board and committee meetings reveals the following:
● Some Board members, stressing their understanding that governing directors owe a fiduciary duty to their constituents and MCE ratepayers, have sought financial and energy market-related information in order to better understand MCE’s operations. As detailed later in this report, these Board members have attempted to understand why MCE’s energy contracts entered into in the fall of 2024 greatly exceeded, by up to approximately $200 million, those of the prior year. They also seek to know the extent of any problem, and how it or similar variances might be avoided in the future. These members also have advocated for internal governance changes to help Board members better monitor financial matters to set policy regarding energy procurement and related matters. ● Other Board members have questioned the need for enhanced financial oversight, and the necessity of creating any new internal committee charged with that task. Some of these members have stressed their general respect for, and trust in, MCE’s experienced management and professional staff. Others in this group have asserted that those who seek more specific and detailed financial information and related internal governance reforms are from small jurisdictions — and hence have too much time on their hands compared with members who serve larger populations. And, as detailed later in this report, some have accused fellow Board members of acting in ways that challenge the Board’s decorum, and impose unreasonably on MCE’s staff. For many of these Board members, those who seek further details about financial transactions and invoke “fiduciary duty” can be, and have been, viewed as impairing MCE’s pre-existing positive “culture.”
● MCE management weighs in on the side of less assertive Board governance, and has acted in a variety of ways consistent with that end. Although MCE explains that it is “governed by [its] Board of Directors” whose “monthly meetings … are always open to the public,” thus ensuring “public transparency and accountability,”40 we have found that this expressed dedication to Board governance is often illusory. We highlight here one example related to MCE’s significant efforts to “onboard” new members.

As recently as early 2025, MCE’s management emphasized a limited scope for Board oversight and investigative roles in its Board training materials, while prioritizing other functions, such as promotion of MCE generally. One such piece, an official MCE Board member orientation slide titled “MCE Board, What is the Assignment?” characterized the role of each new Board member, explaining the “Role of [the] Board of Directors” is to “share,” “inform,” “advise,” and “advocate.” Significantly, this orientation material mentioned nothing about what one might expect to see as a primary role of each Board member: Governance.

Only recently did MCE revise this Board member orientation slide to add the word “Govern” to the list of each member’s role.41 Yet even that change is circumscribed: The revised slide (shown 40 MCE, “MCE Governance & Finance FAQ” / “Who governs MCE?” https://mcecleanenergy.org/faq/. 41 MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Special Meeting, MCE Board Orientation” (Feb. 20, 2025), https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/MCE-Board-Orientation-Meeting190 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 10 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes below) suggests that the primary “focus” of each Board member should be on “the connection” between MCE and that member’s jurisdiction. Certainly, this connection is important, and consistent with MCE’s corporate culture. But this focus diminishes Board governance as a stated priority, on par with “spread the word,” and “offer your perspective.” Moreover, the newer “Assignment” orientation slide imposes a narrow scope to the concept of governance, limiting it to approving MCE’s “budget, rates and policies.”
Caption: MCE Board orientation “assignment” description in effect beginning February 2025 — with “Govern” added.

Source: MCE, https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/MCE-Board-Orientation-MeetingPacket_February_20_2025.pdf, at pdf p.10.

MCE’s current orientation materials also include a slide that makes no reference to any governing role. It acknowledges that Board members have other responsibilities, and emphasizes that they should “rely on and trust” MCE’s staff.42 The same new Board orientation materials also describe the Board’s three standing committees — Executive, Finance, and Technical. The materials state, regarding each, that it “hears and approves” matters within its jurisdiction — but the materials do not specifically mention any role regarding governance.43 The Grand Jury’s Conclusions About Board Member and Management Views of Governance:

The Grand Jury concludes that active governance is clearly anticipated in MCE’s foundational documents, and is necessary for MCE to meet the requirements of those documents. And yet MCE’s Board of Directors is divided about how actively it should govern. This disagreement is compounded because MCE’s management, and some Board members, appear to promote an agency culture that prioritizes deference to the financial and policy preferences of management.

As a result, despite having grown to an $840 million company, decisions affecting MCE’s operation and strategy are currently largely driven by a few members of management.

Packet_February_20_2025.pdf, at pdf p. 10. We acknowledge here that “approve” is certainly one act in governance. However, standing alone and in this context, one reasonable (and likely, in our view) implication to be taken from this piece is that the Board may rely on management’s recommendations, without the need for independent “oversight,” or “investigation,” or “evaluation.” 42 MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “MCE Board Orientation” (Mar. 11, 2026), https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/03/MCE-Board-Orientation-Meeting-Packet-March-2026.pdf, pdf p. 15 (“As elected representatives of their communities, Board members are busy with many work and community commitments. MCE employs professional staff with specialized expertise and full-time engagement on MCE operations that Board members can rely on and trust to focus on MCE’s continued success with their communities.”). 43 Id. at pdf pp. 16–18.
191
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 11 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes

2. MCE’s Board Has Ceded its Authority In Numerous Circumstances Over the past years MCE’s Board of Directors have passed various resolutions, and amendments to its Operating Rules and Regulations, reflecting changes that have ceded Board authority in various key matters. These changes, usually in the form of “delegations” to the CEO, have involved the Board’s authority over purchasing;44 compensation, hiring and firing;45 agenda setting;46 approval of the hiring of General Counsel;47 and most significantly, energy procurement — MCE’s main function.48
44 MCE, “Key Documents” / “Resolutions and Ordinances” / “Resolution 2018-04,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/04/Resolution-2018-04_Designating-the-CEO-as-Agent-Pursuant-to-Code-25500.pdf (see related chart describing the specific ceding of Board authority). 45 MCE, “Key Documents” / “Resolutions and Ordinances” / “Resolution 2018-09,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/10/Resolution-2018-09-Delegating-Auth.-of-Setting-Comp.-Tenure-Appt.-and-Cond.-ofEmplymnt-to-ExCom-and-CEO-1.pdf (see related chart describing the specific ceding of Board authority). 46 MCE, “Formation Documents” / “Amended Operating Rules [and] Regulations (pdf) — August 17, 2023, https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Amended-MCE-Operating-Rules-Regulatons-Final8.21.23.pdf. The prior version of the Operating Rules and Regulations (undated, posted at https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/operating-rules-regulations-asammended.pdf) provided, in article IV, § 1.a, that the Board Chair would “supervise the preparation of the business agenda.” The revised version of article IV, § 1.a, reduces that role, providing that the Board Chair simply “review the business agenda.” 47 MCE, “Key Documents” / “Amended Operating Rules [and] Regulations (pdf) — August 17, 2023,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Amended-MCE-Operating-Rules-Regulatons-Final8.21.23.pdf. The prior version of the Operating Rules and Regulations (undated, posted at https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/operating-rules-regulations-asammended.pdf) listed, in article VII, § 2, as a matter that “shall be approved only by a majority vote of the full membership of the Board,” the following:
“b. The hiring of an Executive Director and General Counsel.” The revised version of that provision (now renumbered article “VI,” § 2.b.), removes the prior reference to General Counsel, and lists only “The hiring of a Chief Executive Director.” MCE, “Formation Documents” / “Amended Operating Rules [and] Regulations (pdf) — August 17, 2023, https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Amended-MCE-Operating-RulesRegulatons-Final-8.21.23.pdf. 48 MCE, “Key Documents” / “Resolutions and Ordinances” / “Resolution 2020-04,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/11/Resolution-2020-04-Delegating-Energy-Procurement.DOCX.pdf (see related chart describing the specific ceding of Board authority). The language of Resolution 2020-04, delegating purchasing authority, traces back through Resolution 2018-03 (https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/04/Resolution2018-03_Rescinding-Reso-No.-2017-02-and-Delegating-Energy-ProcurementAuth.pdf) to Resolution 2017-02 (https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Resolution2017_02_MCE-Delegating-Contracting-Authorities.pdf). 192
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 12 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes Caption: Recent actions ceding MCE Board’s authority to the CEO.

Source: MCE website “Key Documents,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/key-documents/.

In this section, we will focus on the ceding of energy procurement authority, as this has directly affected customer rates. The issue regarding hiring of General Counsel is also touched on below. ● Regarding energy procurement: The Board has, since at least 2017, delegated authority to the CEO to enter into energy procurement contracts as follows:
○ The CEO may unilaterally enter into short term (up to 12 months) energy contracts.
○ The CEO may “jointly,” with the “Technical Committee Chair … after consultation with a Committee of the Board, … approve and execute contracts … for terms of less than or equal to five years.” The most recent MCE policy reflecting these internal controls is Resolution 2020-04.49 Even with this expanded authority, as explained in section 4 of this report, MCE management has routinely violated the internal control rules of Resolution 2020-04 italicized above, by (1) executing contracts with Board members other than the Technical Committee Chair, and (2) without the required prior “consultation” with a committee.

In response to public criticism about these violations of its own longstanding internal controls, MCE management in early 2026 proposed, and the Board approved, Resolution 2026-01. This new procurement resolution created an interim committee to consult about and approve energy contacts, management asserted, “for the purpose of advising on and facilitating MCE’s delegations, as set forth in Resolution 2020-04.”50 49 Ibid.
50 MCE, “Key Documents” / “Resolutions and Ordinances” / “Resolution 2026-01,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/03/2026-01-re-Interim-Advisory-Committee.pdf. The resolution stated: “Consultation with the [interim committee] constitutes ‘consultation with the appropriate Committee of the Board of Directors’ within the meaning of the delegation regarding one- to -five-year energy procurements under Resolution 2020-04, with respect to procurements executed after the date of this Resolution.” Id. at pdf p. 2. The resolution also provided that the interim committee “will sunset when the Board completes its governance assessment, revisits and/or clarifies the 193
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 13 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes Less than one month later, MCE management proposed and recommended the Board approve “Resolution 2026-02,”51 seeking to rescind both Resolutions 2020-04 and 2026-

01. Resolution 2026-02 would, in essence, endorse the past internal control violations, and at the same time, (1) eliminate any consultation with a Board committee, and (2) delegate even more authority to the CEO to enter into short and medium term contracts — including those up to 10 years (and of any value) — as well as all contracts of any duration, so long at the “notional value” is no greater than the huge sum of $65 million.52 Specifically:
○ Instead of prior “consultation” with a “Board committee,” the proposed resolution would require only that the Technical Committee Chair (or in that person’s absence, the Committee Vice Chair, or Board Chair, or Vice Chair of the Board) “must have met with MCE Staff at least once within the prior 12 months to review MCE’s open positions and contracting needs.”53
○ The proposed resolution also would further expand the CEO’s unilateral authority far beyond energy contracts of up to 12 months, instead granting new power to “approve and execute” energy contracts “of any amount, with delivery periods having a cumulative total of less than or equal to 60 months.”54 And this would apply to contracts “of any term, with a notional value less than or equal to $65 million.”55 In other words, with this additional delegation, the CEO would be given unilateral authority over essentially all of MCE’s energy contracts.

When proposed Resolution 2026-02 was submitted to the Board for approval at its April meeting, many public commenters — including the Sierra Club, the Marin Conservation League, and Marin’s Coalition for Sensible Taxpayers — objected, in writing and orally, to the proposed dramatically increased delegation of authority to the CEO.56 In addition, some Board members spoke up, balking at perceived internal inconsistencies in the delegations set forth in Resolution 2020-04 or its successor, or modifies this Resolution, whichever comes first.” Ibid.
51 MCE, “Meeting Archive”/ “Board of Directors April 16, 2026 Meeting Packet,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/04/MCE-Board-Meeting-Packet-April-2026.pdf, at pdf p. 88. 52 Id. at pdf at pp. 99–101 (reline comparing proposed changes with Resolution 2020-04). 53 Id. at pdf at p. 100.
54 Id. at pdf pp. 100–101.
55 Id. at pdf p. 101.
56 MCE, “Meeting Archive”/ “Board of Directors April 16, 2026 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3Juv1s4cVY, at 1:33:50–1:54:20. Regarding the written comments, see, e.g., MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment Letter from Lucy Dilworth — Distributed

4.15.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Public-Comment-Letter-Lucy-Dilworth4.14.26.pdf (CST); id., “Public Comment Letter from Julia Dowell — Distributed 4.15.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Public-Comment-Letter-Julia-Dowell-4.15.26.pdf (Sierra Club); “Public Comment Letter from Alicia Minyen — Distributed 4.15.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/04/Public-Comment-Letter-Alicia-Minyen-4.16.16.pdf; “Public Comment Letter from Michael Kamerick — Distributed 4.16.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/PublicComment-Letter-Michael-Kamerick.pdf (Sierra Club); “Public Comment Letter from Nick Pappas — Distributed

4.17.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Public-Comment-Letter-Nick-Pappas4.17.26.pdf; “Public Comment from Doug Kelly — Distributed 4.17.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/, /Public-Comment-Letter-Doug-Kelly-4.16.16.pdf (CST); “Public Comment from Mary Fitzpatrick — Distributed 4.21.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Public-CommentLetter-Mary-Fitzpatrick-4.21.26.pdf. 194
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 14 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes proposal and supporting materials, and lack of guardrails.57 For example, one Board member, apparently referencing the recent $200 million variance in MCE’s energy costs, observed that the “challenges and missteps of the recent past have made it clear that this organization requires more oversight of its contracting activities, not less.”58 In essence, these members apparently believed that the suggestion to significantly further delegate authority to the CEO was poorly thought out and presented — and that Resolution 2026- 02 required substantial revision.

In response, the Board Chair tabled the proposal, and indicated that revisions might be offered and considered in an upcoming MCE “procurement workshop.”59 It is unclear when this matter will be brought back to the Board.
● Regarding General Counsel: The Board has also delegated to the CEO all authority for the hiring of General Counsel. Prior to August 17, 2023, MCE’s Operating Rules and Regulations (OR&R) required Board approval for the hiring of General Counsel. MCE’s revised OR&R, as amended on August 17, 2023, no longer requires such Board approval (see fn. 47). In our interviews, MCE Board members informed us that removing the Board’s own authority to approve such hiring has left the Board without access to adequate independent legal advice.

As further detailed in the Appendix, we see irregularities surrounding General Counsel’s appointment that may have left the Board unaware of how this change occurred. ○ It appears that MCE’s CEO elevated the current General Counsel to that role in about April 2023 — prior to the August 17 change in the OR&R, and at a time when such an appointment required approval of the full Board. MCE purports to post (for open meetings) all Board documents on its official “Board Archive” of its proceedings. However, we have not found any Board approval, vote, or Board Minutes documenting such approval. Nor have we found any Agenda item for discussion, or even formal notice to the Board on this topic. Without full Board approval, we think General Counsel could not have assumed that position under the rules then in effect.
○ MCE’s Board Archive also fails to show (as of the time of writing this report) any record reflecting that the Board was presented with any proposal to give up its then-existing authority to approve the hiring of General Counsel. We have learned that such a proposal was indeed shared with the Board immediately before the Board’s vote, yet we have not been able to discern that this late documentation was properly shared with the public, and the changes shown in the late documentation regarding General Counsel were not highlighted or described to the Board. In view of this history, and as more fully explained in the Appendix:
57 MCE, “Meeting Archive”/ “Board of Directors April 16, 2026 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3Juv1s4cVY, at 1:19:20–1:22:50. 58 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Board Statement from Director Kevin Jacobs,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Board_Statement_Resolution_2026-02-Kevin-Jacobs.pdf, at pdf p. 2.
59 MCE, “Meeting Archive”/ “Board of Directors April 16, 2026 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3Juv1s4cVY, at 1:55:00–1:55:15. 195
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 15 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes (1) It is not apparent that the key document proposing to remove the Board’s authority to approve hiring of General Counsel was made available to the public prior to the Board’s vote (and indeed, it remains hidden from public view even now) — raising questions about whether the procedure followed complied with the “public inspection” requirements of the Brown Act, California’s “open public meetings” law;60 (2) The Board’s vote to remove its own authority to approve the hiring of General Counsel, made in light of MCE management’s repeated failure to highlight that significant change, contributed to a serious procedural irregularity, leaving us to question whether (a) the Board received adequate and independent legal advice about an issue that directly affected General Counsel, and (b) the Board was aware of the significant change that it approved.
(3) The documents setting out the proposed changes to the OR&R were appended to an email sent to Board members on August 16, and then subsequently “distributed” to the Board at the August 17 meeting. In order to provide public access for those attending that meeting remotely, the documents appended to that late email submission should have been immediately posted on MCE’s website, as contemplated by the Brown Act, Government Code section 54957.5, subdivision (b)(2)(B) — and also identified to the video audience during the Board meeting.

The Grand Jury’s Conclusions About The Board Giving Up Authority to the CEO: The Board has delegated its authority to MCE management in a number of areas — most prominently regarding energy procurement, and control of General Counsel. In light of the apparent disagreement among Board members concerning their proper role, we are concerned that the shift of authority to the CEO has made it more difficult for the Board to provide meaningful fiduciary oversight. Relatedly, and as discussed later in this report, the Board needs, but in recent years has not consistently received, adequate independent legal advice. 60 Specifically: Cal. Gov. Code, section 54957.5, subdivision (b)(1), requires that materials distributed less than 72 hours prior to discussion of agenda items must be made available for “public inspection … at the time the writing is distributed” to the Board members. The section provides two alternative ways for an agency to comply with this requirement: First, under subdivision (b)(2)(A), the agency shall (i) make the writing available for public inspection “at a public office or location that the agency shall designate for this purpose” and (ii) list the address where [the writing] is available “on the agendas for all meetings of the legislative body of that agency.” Alternatively, an agency can comply under subdivision (b)(2)(B), by satisfying each of four different requirements, one of which is:
“(ii) The … agency immediately posts [the writing] on the … agency’s internet website.” 196
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 16 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes

3. Public Interest Groups Provide Constructive Criticism, But Frequently Receive No Meaningful Response From MCE
As alluded to previously, various entities, including Marin’s Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers, the statewide Clean Coalition, and Marin Conservation League, have submitted extensive public comments that have, in turn, been posted on MCE’s website.61 Various individuals, including members of these groups, have spoken during “public comment” sessions at MCE Board and committee meetings. All of these entities and speakers have supported MCE’s mission and wish for it to succeed.62 Yet all have raised substantial concerns about MCE’s financial and energy procurement decisions and related strategies, and all have expressed related concerns about MCE’s financial oversight, management transparency, and governance structure. Some of these criticisms and observations are reflected in our “findings” and “recommendations” listed later in this report. We summarize below key points raised by some of these entities:
● Comments by Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers — presenting comparisons with other CCAs: In September 2025 Marin’s Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers (CST) undertook a comparison of MCE with its CCA peers.63 CST’s comment offered seven financial metric charts illustrating MCE’s poor financial performance relative to its peers.

For example:
○ One chart shows “the dramatic $186MM increase in energy costs MCE experienced in 2025 compared to its CCA peers. MCE’s energy costs were 30% higher in 2025 compared to the peer average of 4%.”64
61 Other similar entities have likewise submitted related comments advocating financial and corresponding governance reforms. MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Sustainable San Rafael Comment Letter — Submitted October 3, 2025,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Public-Letter-Bill-CarneySustainable-San-Rafael-10.3.25.pdf; MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “350Marin Comment Letter — Submitted October 6, 2025,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/350Marin-SteeringCommittee-Letter-Jody-Timms.pdf; and MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment Letter from Robin Moller — Distributed on December 2, 2025,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2025/12/12.1.25-Robin-Moller.pdf. 62 For consistency and clarity, all documents and speech, submitted to MCE by the public, will in this report be referred to as “public comment,” or simply “comment.”
63 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Mathew Salter’s Request to Distribute Letter from Mimi Willard — Distributed November 19, 2025,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/PublicComment-Letter-submitted-by-M.Salter-11.18.25.pdf. CST observed that most CCAs report on a June 30 financial fiscal year end, except for MCE and Silicon Valley Clean Energy. It explained that its analysis adjusted MCE and Silicon Valley Clean Energy’s reported financial statements to align those agencies. Ibid. 64 Ibid.
197
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 17 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes Caption: Change in Energy Costs at Top-10 CCAs — 2024–2025. Source: Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers (CST), https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Public-Comment-Letter-submitted-by-M.Salter-11.18.25.pdf, at pdf p. 6. (Note: MCE and SVE financial statements were adjusted to reflect a June 30, 2025 fiscal year-end.) ○ Another CST chart shows MCE’s 2025 energy costs per MWh compared with its peers. “MCE’s energy cost at $143 per MWh was the highest of its peers, 30% higher than the CCA average of $110 per MWh. This is a direct result of the timing, terms, and volume of short-term financial hedges and renewable energy credits (PCC1) that MCE procured.[65] While all CCAs faced surging prices in the resource adequacy and renewable energy credits markets during the period, MCE was an outlier.”66
65 Regarding the terminology “renewable energy credits” (or certificates), also known as RECs, and “PCC1,” MCE’s website states: “Each time 1 megawatt of renewable energy is generated, a corresponding renewable energy certificate (REC) is also generated. RECs are the main method of accounting for renewable energy transactions.” MCE, “Energy Expert: Utility Power Purchasing”/ “How is Power Accounted for?” https://mcecleanenergy.org/energy-expert-utility-power-purchasing/. The same MCE page addresses “three types of RECs,” describing “PCC 1 RECs [as] … bundled with electricity that comes from [a] renewable energy facility.” By contrast, the page explains, “PCC 2 RECs … are bundled with electricity, but the electricity … doesn’t have to come from [a] renewable energy facility”; and finally, “PCC 3 RECs are produced by a renewable facility, but they’re unbundled and sold without the associated electricity.” Ibid. 66 Ibid.
198
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 18 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes Caption: 2025 Energy Costs ($/MWh) at Top-10 CCAs. Source: Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers (CST), https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Public-Comment-Letter-submitted-by-M.Salter-11.18.25.pdf, at pdf. 7.
○ CST concluded that “MCE produced dismal fiscal 2025 results primarily due to agency-specific high energy costs and, to a lesser extent, rising staffing costs. We call on management to provide a far more detailed explanation — with accompanying documentation — of its poor financial performance in 2025.

Ratepayers deserve accountability, transparency, predictability, and credibility — none of which is currently provided by MCE. CST calls on MCE’s Board to address this situation with the urgency it merits.”67
To date, MCE has posted no response to the CST public comment, nor has it otherwise addressed CST’s analysis.
● Comments by Clean Coalition — concerning MCE’s comparative price differentials, energy purchasing decisions, and related transparency / accountability: By public comments, Clean Coalition (CC), a statewide group focused on accelerating the transition to renewable energy, presented its own comparative rates analysis of various peer CCAs, and asserted that MCE’s “price differentials, relative to PG&E, are outliers.”68 (In other words, CC reported, the average customer’s bill difference between MCE and PG&E is greater than the average bill difference between other CCAs and their own investor owned utility company.) At the MCE Board meeting held later that month, MCE management dismissed CC’s analysis as an inapt “apples-tooranges” comparison.69 In a subsequent comment to MCE’s Board, CC stated:
67 Ibid.
68 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Clean Coalition Comment Letter for September MCE Board Meeting,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/RE-Item-7-Meeting-Minutes_CleanCoalition_9.17.25.pdf. 69 MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors September 18, 2025 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmB25Q_rNSY, at 1:48:57–1:50:35. 199
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 19 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes ○ “Our analysis shows that MCE’s customers are paying some of the highest premiums above the host utility.”70
○ “There is no statistical correlation between renewable energy content and electricity rates when reviewing CCA data. In other words, it is mathematically untrue that CCAs with a higher renewable content must charge the highest electricity rates.”71
○ “Average wholesale energy prices have been falling for multiple years (even as MCE has consistently misforecasted market conditions).”72 “The Board deserves a detailed line-by-line explanation of why MCE’s Energy Costs have risen significantly at a time when market energy prices have declined.” In this respect, CC posed several pointed questions concerning transparency and accountability (see graphic) and concluded: “Until these questions are answered comprehensively, the Board does not have sufficient information to implement the meaningful reforms needed to prevent anything similar from happening again.”73
Caption: Questions posed by Clean Coalition to MCE regarding its transparency and accountability. Source: Clean Coalition https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Clean-Coalition-Letter-9.30.25.pdf, at pdf p. 5. 70 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Clean Coalition Comment Letter for September MCE Board Meeting,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/RE-Item-7-Meeting-Minutes_CleanCoalition_9.17.25.pdf. 71 Ibid.
72 Ibid. The letter continued: “One of the questionable assertions made in regard to the unexpected $200 million swing in Energy Costs experienced by MCE is that the increased costs can be attributed to short-term contracts, hedging, and normal volatility. While the Clean Coalition is not questioning this particular data that was provided by MCE staff, the most important questions were left completely unanswered. What specific underlying market dynamics left MCE on the hook for these high prices, and was it foreseeable? …. On average, the price of wholesale energy in the CAISO market has decreased in each of the last three years since the end of MCE’s Fiscal Year 2023, which ended in March 2023. [Citing and showing a graph.] Market fluctuations are traditionally dictated by natural gas prices, with higher prices during the annual system peak in the summer and extending through the winter as demand increases due to reliance on natural gas for heating purposes. This is a predictable trend.” Ibid. 73 Ibid.
200
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 20 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes MCE management addressed CC’s public comments in a response, directed to MCE Board members, posted on MCE’s website. Regarding CC’s first and main issue, that MCE’s must remain competitive, the response asserted that, although MCE has no “policy” regarding comparing its rates to those of other CCAs, “MCE remains competitive compared to its CCA peers and PG&E.”74 The response also attributed the approximately $200 million variance in energy costs that MCE had experienced in the 2024–2025 fiscal year in part to MCE’s policy of “high quality renewable purchases.”75 The response did not directly address CC’s contention that a CCA such as MCE, that provides higher renewable content than its peers, need not also charge the highest electricity rates, or how CC went wrong in its analysis. Although one might expect some explanation that would allow observers to understand why CC’s numbers might be “apples,” and MCE’s numbers might be “oranges,” MCE’s response instead explains MCE’s management’s views on a variety of subjects,76 while extolling the virtues of MCE’s products. Nor did the response acknowledge or address CC’s pointed criticisms (found in its follow-up public comment, and highlighted above) concerning fiscal responsibility, transparency, and the Board’s ability to fulfill its governance responsibilities.
● Comments by Marin Conservation League — questioning energy contracts that were signed at the height of the market, and the “greenness” of such contracts:

Beginning in September 2025 Marin Conservation League (MCL), an entity devoted to preserving and protecting Marin’s natural assets in a changing environment, submitted various critiques addressing MCE’s finances, transparency, and governance, all of which have been posted on MCE’s website.77 Most recently, in late January 2026 MCL submitted a new public comment focusing on the $200 million that MCE spent in FY 2024–25 on certain energy contracts that were signed at the height of the market.78 MCL requested that MCE “provide a full analysis of the impact and value” of such contracts in order to determine the extent to which they actually reflect or encourage what is termed in the industry as “additionality” — that is, evidence that a renewable energy procurement contract has directly caused the construction of new (additional) renewable energy generation capacity that would not otherwise have been built. MCL noted that 74 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “MCE Response to Clean Coalition Letters — Distributed October 1, 2025,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/MCE-Response-to-Clean-CoalitionLetters.pdf. 75 Ibid.
76 Ibid. MCE’s response begins with a discussion of rates and costs, but then veers from addressing CC’s points, instead discussing bill credits, local solar generation, maintenance of financial reserves, and various activities in its “suite of customer programs” — and summarizing all of this as examples of “Adaptability and Innovation.” Ibid. 77 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Marin Conservation League Letter — Submitted October 3, 2025” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/MCL-to-MCE-10.3.25.pdf; “Marin Conservation League Letter — Submitted November 18, 2025” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/11.18.25- Public-Comment-Rebecca-Schwartz-Lesberg-for-MCE-BOD-meeting-agenda-item-8.pdf; “Marin Conservation League Letter — Submitted November 19, 2025” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/11.19.25- Public-Comment-Rebecca-Schwartz-for-MCE-BOD-meeting-agenda-item-9.pdf. 78 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment Letter from Rebecca Schwartz at MCL — Distributed February 2, 2026” (letter dated Jan. 29, 2026), https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/02/Public-Comment-from-Rebecca-Schwartz-Lesberg-at-MCL-Distributed-2.2.26.pdf. 201
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 21 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes “MCE and the Board have significant discretion over this very large expenditure” that, MCL asserted, only “reshuffles” clean energy attributes among parties, and yet those same funds could be better expended on other more worthy projects that might provide more renewable energy and more real reduction in greenhouse-gas energy sources. MCL suggested that MCE has entered into such questionable contracts in order for MCE to acquire the legal right to claim (and advertise) a higher renewable Power Content Label (PCL) attributable to its electricity generation. Yet, MCL asserted, such energy purchases do not, in fact, lead to substantial (or perhaps even any) real-world environmental “additionality.”79 The questions raised by MCL’s comment appear to be reasonably intended to elicit information that could be useful in the Board’s evaluation of the costs and benefits of the FY 2024–25 contracts, and similar contracts in the future.

MCE quickly issued a response, denying that MCE enters into certain types of energy purchasing contracts solely so that it can report a more “green” power content label in its advertising.80 This response did not address MCL’s concern that the funds paid for the challenged expensive energy contracts might better be spent on other more worthy “green” projects. Moreover, as MCL observed in its own subsequent reply, MCE’s response failed to address the substance of MCL’s other points,81 stating that MCE offered “no quantification in megawatts, number of facilities, or any other metric of new capacity”; and its “statements [did] not explain how buying attributes through [the challenged] contracts lead to any new renewable or GHG-free energy capacity.”82 Nor, MCL observed, did MCE’s response address MCL’s primary assertion that some of MCE’s key contracts amount to greenwashing — that is, energy attributes being “reshuffled” among parties without creating new renewable energy or GHG-free energy production or capacity, for the purpose of enhancing MCE’s Power Content Label.

Accordingly, MCL repeated its earlier request that MCE thoroughly assess the costs and environmental benefits of the challenged contracts and present the results to the appropriate Board committees and the full Board, so that the Board can incorporate the 79 Ibid. This issue is also addressed in more specific detail in a subsequent submission by MCE customer and observer Nick Pappas: “Purchasing these offsets has added hundreds of dollars to MCE customer bills in recent years, and it is worth noting that these purchases are strictly for voluntary marketing claims. Even as prices have declined, MCE proposes to spend $54 million … on short-term attributes in FY26-27 — around $90 per household.” He asks Board members: “Do you have enough information to justify these added costs to your constituents?” MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment From Nick Pappas — Distributed 2.19.26, at pdf p. 5. https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Public-Comment-from-Nick-Pappas-Distributed2.19.26.pdf. 80 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Response to MCL — Distributed February 2, 2026,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/MCE-Response-to-MCL-Comment-2.2.26.pdf. MCE’s response begins: “MCE did not spend $202 million on unbundled (“PCC3”) attribute-only contracts, as stated in the letter.” “PCC3” (meaning “Portfolio Content Category 3”) refers to certain types of energy contracts. Yet MCL’s letter nowhere referred to or addressed such contracts. 81 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment from Rebecca Schwartz at MCL — Distributed 2.11.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Public-Comment-from-RebeccaSchwartz-Lesberg-at-MCL-Distributed-2.11.26.pdf. 82 Ibid.
202
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 22 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes findings from that analysis “into the current budget process.”83 Again, this appears to be a reasonable request, as the Board should have sufficient information to evaluate these concerns.

As of this writing, MCE has provided no further response to MCL’s reply. In the meantime, the Sierra Club recently has submitted extensive public comment, echoing and expounding upon MCL’s concerns — including, specifically, that “MCE spends significant ratepayer funds on environmental attributes — often of questionable impact — to offset [‘fossil energy products’] … purchases on its Power Content Label.”84 The Grand Jury’s Conclusions About Public Comments by Watchdog Groups: Numerous wellintentioned advocates have been critical of MCE regarding its financial performance; average customer bills exceeding those of full service PG&E customers by a larger amount than at peer CCAs; and costly renewable energy purchases that serve to increase MCE’s advertised “greenness” but, assertedly, contribute no (or little) additional clean energy. The Grand Jury has evaluated these comments because they raised issues later discussed by Board members.

Although we do not take a position on these technical claims, we believe it is necessary for these comments to be addressed by management and the Board. To accomplish this, the Board will require more detailed information contained in these contracts. Whereas MCE management asserts it has responded to these public comments, in the best of cases, it does not respond to critics, specifically and substantively. In other instances, management has provided no response, mischaracterized the criticisms, misdirected and shifted responsibility, or responded with marketing.
83 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment from Rebecca Schwartz at MCL — Distributed 2.11.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Public-Comment-from-RebeccaSchwartz-Lesberg-at-MCL-Distributed-2.11.26.pdf. 84 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment Letter from Julia Dowell — Distributed

4.15.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Public-Comment-Letter-Julia-Dowell4.15.26.pdf, at pdf p. 4. The Sierra Club concludes: “Beyond these significant environmental policy concerns, these attributes represent considerable expenditures from MCE customers — unjustly adding to the energy burden for the

1.5 million people MCE serves for no apparent benefit or purpose beyond fleeting and illusory environmental claims. MCE proposes to spend $54 million in the next fiscal year on these attributes, approximately $90 per household, in addition to the hundreds of millions it will spend to back these paper attributes with fossil energy and capacity.” Id. at pdf p. 5. MCE quickly posted an extensive response, again challenging the analysis employed by both MCL, and embraced by the Sierra Club. MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “MCE’s Response to Sierra Club Letter,”https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/MCE-Reponse-to-Sierra-Club-LetterMCE-Energy-Procurement-and-Governance-Concerns-April-15-2026.pdf, at pdf pp. 1–4. Regarding the Sierra Club’s contention quoted in the text above, MCE replied: “Despite repeated assertions to the contrary, MCE does not purchase short-term attributes to mask reliance on the gas-fired fleet in the grid. MCE does use short-term contracts for bundled renewable and greenhouse gas-free energy to help bridge the gap as we wait for new long-term resources to come online and to help keep costs lower for customers.” Id. at pdf p. 4. 203
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 23 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes

4. MCE’s Management Has Violated its Internal Controls Concerning Energy Contracts, and Promoted Inaccurate Advertising About “Green” Power Content
MCE has failed to adhere to its own important internal controls governing consultation about, and signing of, certain significant and costly energy contracts. Questions have also been raised concerning the accuracy of certain advertising statements about the renewability of MCE’s power content, statements that MCE later revised.85 We believe these errors arise out of management’s casual approach to internal controls and transparency. ● Compliance with internal controls concerning consultation about and execution of one-to-five-year energy contracts: MCE’s Resolution 2020-04 states: “The CEO and Technical Committee Chair, jointly, are hereby authorized, after consultation with the appropriate Committee of the Board of Directors, to approve and execute contracts for Energy Procurement for terms of less than or equal to five years. The CEO shall timely report to the Board of Directors all such executed contracts.”86 In early 2026 an observer, who had reviewed a posted draft of MCE management’s proposal for addressing recently asserted “misinformation,” questioned whether MCE was adhering to its own internal consultation and execution rules called for by Resolution 2020-04.87 The observer called for an audit to examine whether contracts were signed by the appropriate Board members, and implored the Board to act “as fiduciaries,” to “ensure that the CEO does not bind MCE into energy procurement contracts that are not properly authorized and executed.”88
MCE responded in a legal memo to the Board’s Technical Committee, reflecting an internal investigation signed jointly by MCE’s General Counsel and outside counsel.89 85 MCE itself highlighted these two problems in its own document that was designed to address asserted “misinformation” about MCE. See MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors January 15, 2026 Supplemental Packet,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/MCE-Board-MeetingSupplemental-Packet-January-2026.pdf, Item 5, Consent Calendar, C.4 (“Ensuring Accuracy in Local Information”), at pdf p. 19.
86 MCE, “Key Documents” / “Resolutions and Ordinances” / “Resolution 2020-04,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/11/Resolution-2020-04-Delegating-Energy-Procurement.DOCX.pdf. The Resolution states, in relevant part: “2. Delegation to the Chief Executive Officer and Technical Committee Chair, Jointly. [Par.] The CEO and Technical Committee Chair, jointly, are hereby authorized, after consultation with the appropriate Committee of the Board of Directors, to approve and execute contracts for Energy Procurement for terms of less than or equal to five years. The CEO shall timely report to the Board of Directors all such executed contracts.” 87 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment Letter by Alicia Minyen — Distributed January 6, 2026,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/1.6.26-Alicia-Minyen.pdf, at pdf p. 2.

This public comment responded to a draft document set out in MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Executive Committee January 5, 2026 Meeting Packet” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/MCE-ExecutiveCommittee-Meeting-Packet_January_2026.pdf, item 5.C.2 (“Corrections to Marin IJ & Misinformation”). 88 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment Letter by Alicia Minyen — Distributed January 6, 2026,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/1.6.26-Alicia-Minyen.pdf, at pdf p. 3. 89 MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Technical Committee February 6, 2026 Meeting Packet,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/MCE-Technical_Committee-Packet-February_2026.pdf, at 204
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 24 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes ○ Regarding consultation, the memo asserted that Resolution 2020-04 “does not specify a minimal level of detail to be provided to the Technical Committee during the ‘consultation’ process,” and that management’s “historic practice” of providing only high level and general overview once, at the beginning of each year, satisfies the requirement of “prior consultation” with the Technical Committee.
90 ○ Regarding execution of contracts, the memo conceded that “20 active one-to fiveyear contracts were executed jointly by the CEO ... and either Chair or the Vice Chair of the Board of Directors” (i.e., not by “the CEO and Technical Committee Chair, jointly,” as required by Resolution 2020-04). And yet, the memo concluded, this repeated practice was consistent with Resolution 2020-04, “when read jointly with” another MCE document — its “Operating Rules and Regulations.”91
The Grand Jury’s Assessment: We have doubts about the MCE legal memo’s analysis regarding both (1) Resolution 2020-04’s “consultation” requirement, and (2) its execution / authorization requirement.
(1) Regarding Resolution 2020-04’s consultation requirement: It seems questionable whether the truncated once-per-year consultation afforded by MCE management in the last few years comports with the spirit and intent of Resolution 2020-04’s explicit requirement of prior “consultation with the appropriate Committee of the Board of Directors.”
(2) Regarding Resolution 2020-04’s execution / authorization requirement: MCE’s legal memo concludes that a long-existing general provision in MCE’s Operating Rules and Regulations (the language of which is not quoted in MCE’s memo), authorizes the challenged routine departure from the much more specific (and more-recently adopted) internal control procedure that Resolution 2020-04 requires for the execution / authorization of energy contracts. But assuming for purposes of analysis that these two provisions can properly be harmonized as the MCE legal memo maintains, to allow some departure from the specific execution / authorization requirements of Resolution 2020-04 in unusual circumstances, we find it troubling that such departures have been routine. 92 pdf p. 66 (agenda item 9, “Resolution 2020-04: Review Consultation and Execution of Certain Contracts (Discussion)”).
90 Ibid.
91 Ibid. The memo asserts:” The OR&R (which is a separate exercise of the Board’s authority) expressly authorize the Chair to execute contracts adopted or authorized by the Board and for the Vice-Chair to execute the Chair’s duties in the Chair’s absence. (OR&R Article IV, Section 1(a) & (b).) Thus, Resolution 2020-04 read jointly with the OR&R explains that the Chair or Vice-Chair may also approve and execute a contract that was entered into pursuant to the Resolution 2020-04 as authorized by the Board when necessary and proper.” Ibid.

We note that the MCE legal memo does not quote the language of MCE’s Operating Rules and Regulations, article IV, § 1, parts a & b. Those passages provide, in relevant part: “Duties of the Chairperson [or in that person’s absence, the Vice-Chair] are to review the business agenda before MCE meetings, preside over MCE Board meetings, and sign all ordinances, resolutions, contracts, and correspondence adopted or authorized by the Board.” MCE “Formation Documents” / “Amended Operating Rules and Regulations (pdf) — August 17, 2023,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Amended-MCE-Operating-Rules-Regulatons-Final8.21.23.pdf 92 It seems apparent that regarding one-to-five-year energy contracts, Resolution 2020-04 is the more specific and primary controlling provision — and that the OR&R, referring in general to other “contracts,” serves at most as a back-up provision that should become applicable in only rare circumstances, if ever. 205
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 25 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes Despite at least 20 recent deviations from the procedure required by Resolution 2020- 04,93 neither MCE’s General Counsel nor its CEO brought this internal control violation to the attention of the Board. With such notification, the Board could have been advised, and considered whether to take steps to address the continuing transgressions. And armed with such knowledge, the Board might have avoided large purchases of energy that continue to affect MCE’s ability to lower the cost of electricity for ratepayers. Instead, it took an outside observer to uncover this apparent significant failure to follow MCE’s own internal control rules in this important respect. This, we conclude, appears to reflect problematic inattention by the Board, management’s casual attitude toward operating rules, and a willingness to engage in corner-cutting by MCE management and its General Counsel.
● MCE’s assertion that it has provided “100% fossil-free power since 2018”: As noted above, a public comment response, prepared by MCE management and designed to address asserted “misinformation” about MCE, prominently included a significant error that MCE has used in its advertising.94 The first bullet point in this piece stated: “Fifteen years of reliable service and 100% fossil-free power since 2018.”95 After another outside observer called into question the truth of this statement, and raised a related concern that the Board “might not be getting a clear picture on [this or] other environmental issues,”96 six days later MCE rescinded its claim.97 Yet, at a subsequent public meeting, MCE’s CEO downplayed that abandonment and presented an alternative narrative, stating: “A newspaper article may have given the impression that MCE changed its language regarding fossil free due to a reform. Instead, this change is due to a long-standing approach to incorporate feedback from all sides and accommodate requests in the most 93 MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Technical Committee February 6, 2026 Meeting Packet,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/MCE-Technical_Committee-Packet-February_2026.pdf (agenda item 9, “Resolution 2020-04: Review Consultation and Execution of Certain Contracts (Discussion)”). We do not know whether (and if so, to what extent) this deviation from internal controls also occurred with regard to shorter-term energy contracts that were, as of the date of the MCE legal memo, no longer “active.” 94 MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors January 15, 2026 Supplemental Packet,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/MCE-Board-Meeting-Supplemental-Packet-January2026.pdf, Item 5, Consent Calendar, C.4 (“Ensuring Accuracy in Local Information”), at pdf p. 19. 95 Ibid. The Executive Committee had earlier discussed this statement, and some Board members had questioned its accuracy. See MCE “Meeting Archive” “Executive Committee January 5, 2026 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pfw9mTQ1RM8 at, e.g., 1:53:13–15:29 [quoting the statement, and asking, “have we had 100 percent fossil free power for the 15 years?” In response the CEO stated: “[Yes,] you can go back and look at the power content label” and, on immediate further questioning, confirmed that the statement applied “for the entire 15 years.” Id. at 1:53:30–1:53:38. Nevertheless, after additional pointed public comment on the issue (id. at 2:44:11–2:46:58), and related clarifications from MCE staff (id. at 2:55:08–2:55:16), acknowledging that MCE had indeed acquired some amounts of energy that was not fossil free, the Executive Committee ultimately voted to retain the quoted statement, but to add a caveat footnote. Id. at 2:56:15–2:35:46. The resulting footnote appears in the previously cited version of the public comment response set out in the January 15, 2026 Board packet (see fn. 94), and reads: “In the early years of MCE’s operations, specifically in 2015, 2016, and 2017, our Light Green product included a limited amount of natural gas, ranging from 5% to 12%, as reflected in the Power Content Labels published by the California Energy Commission.”
96 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Request to Forward to the Board — Director Kullaway — Distributed January 21, 2026,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Request-to-Forward-toBoard-Director-Kullaway.pdf. 97 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Message to the Board — Jamie Tuckey — Distributed January 21, 2026, https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Message-to-Board-Jamie-Tuckey.pdf. 206
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 26 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes simple way … so we removed the term entirely for simplicity.”98 We find this a facile recharacterization, in response to criticism, to avoid acknowledging an obvious error.

Similar issues continue to arise at MCE. Even as we write this, according to media reporting in April 2026, MCE overpaid its CEO about $60,000 in 2024.99 Although this overpayment is not directly related to the contract signing violations and advertising error that we mention above, these three aspects of MCE’s operations share a common theme: lack of sufficient internal controls. According to the media report, MCE has explained that it conducted a comprehensive audit, and advised that this overpayment was an isolated event.100 However, we note that this incident apparently did not come to light in MCE’s financial audit of FY 2024–25, and MCE’s spokesperson did not say whether this compensation error was the result of a single overpayment, or multiple monthly payments.

The Grand Jury’s Conclusions About Internal Controls and Exaggerated Marketing Claims:

MCE has repeatedly violated its own internal controls concerning Board consultation, and signing of energy contracts, effectively removing Board members from decisions about important, short-term, power expenditures. Moreover, although MCE does, to a significant extent, supply clean energy to its customers, its exaggerated claims have created unnecessary public confusion, and the extent of the “greenness” of MCE’s energy portfolio continues to be unclear. Management appears to consider following critical controls optional, and routinely minimizes violations, or claims its contrary actions are consistent with the rules.

5. MCE’s Energy Costs Have Recently Increased Without Board Visibility Or Influence
When certain energy costs increased dramatically in 2024, the Board learned about this only months after the contracts were signed (and therefore the costs incurred). Rather than bring this to the attention of the Board in advance to discuss possible alternatives, the $200 million energy cost increase was decided without the Board weighing in on these substantial expenditures.

According to MCE’s most recent audited financial statement for FY 2024–25, its cost of electricity increased from $571.4 million in FY 2024 to $768.5 million in FY 2025, an increase of $197.1 million (more than 34 percent).101 MCE’s professional independent auditor noted that “the primary reason for the increase in energy costs was the rising costs in the resource adequacy market and the timing and pricing of certain contracts that were executed to comply with the State’s Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) through acquisition of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs).”102
98 MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “Executive Committee February 2, 2026 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZhnn8fa7vU, at 15:25–16:35. 99 Steven Rosenfeld, “MCE overpaid chief executive nearly $60K in 2024” (Apr. 26, 2026) Marin Independent Journal, https://www.marinij.com/2026/04/26/mce-overpaid-chief-executive-nearly-60k-in-2024/. 100 Ibid.
101 MCE, “Key Documents” / “Audited Financial Statements” / “2025 Financial Statements (pdf),” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Final-Audited-Financial-Statements-FY_-2024.25.pdf, at pdf p. 12.
102 Id. at pdf p. 7, italics added. The purchasing of costly RECs is discussed in the text and accompanying fn. 133. 207
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 27 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes That increase in energy costs led to an operating loss of $12.1 million in FY 2024–25, contrasted with an operating gain of $144.1 million the prior year — a swing of $156.2 million.103 MCE reported an overall gain of $13.2 million that year when including investment income,104 and MCE’s independent auditor reported that “despite the increases in prices for energy products, MCE remains in a strong financial position with a stable customer base.”105 Neither of these positive statements can be attributed to FY 2024-05 energy purchasing, MCE’s primary activity.

Another driver of operating costs, though to a lesser extent, is the increase in staff compensation from $20.9 million in FY 2023–24 to $24.7 million in FY 2024–25,106 an increase of 18 percent.

Indeed, in the seven years between FY 2017–18 and FY 2024–25, total staffing costs grew by more than 400 percent — from $5.9 million107 to $24.7 million — and during this same period employee headcount (full time equivalent) rose from 76 to 115 — a jump of more than 50 percent.108 The previously mentioned CCA peer analysis by Marin’s Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers (CST) shows that MCE’s FY 2024–25 compensation as a percentage of total revenue was already among the highest for top-10 CCAs.109 According to CST, in 2025 MCE’s staff costs accounted for 3.2 percent of revenue. “This is significantly higher than the peer CCA average of 2.5% of revenue. Staff costs at the larger CCAs, San Diego Community Power and Clean Power Alliance, are considerably lower at 1.4% and 1.6% respectively. As the agencies scale, overhead costs as a percentage should fall due to economies of scale. Unfortunately, MCE is not achieving the same level of efficiency as it scales, resulting in [poorer performance] … than its peers.”110
103 Id. at pdf. p. 12.
104 Ibid.
105 MCE, “Key Documents” / “Audited Financial Statements” / “2025 Financial Statements (pdf),” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Final-Audited-Financial-Statements-FY_-2024.25.pdf, at pdf p. 9.
106 Id. at pdf p. 12.
107 MCE, “Key Documents” / “Audited Financial Statements” / “2018 Financial Statements (pdf),” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/MCE-Financial-Statements-Years-Ended-March-31-2018- 2017-With-Report-of-Independent-Auditors.pdf, at pdf p. 14 (FY 2017–2018). 108 Government Compensation in California, “Marin Clean Energy 2018,” https://publicpay.ca.gov/Reports/SpecialDistricts/SpecialDistrict.aspx?entityid=2821&year=2018 (104 reported “employees,” minus the then-28 unpaid Board members); MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors February 11, 2026 Special Meeting.” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/MCE-Board-Meeting-PacketFebruary-2026.pdf, at pdf p. p. 87 (showing FY 2024–2025 staff). 109 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Mathew Salter’s Request to Distribute Letter from Mimi Willard — Distributed November 19, 2025,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/PublicComment-Letter-submitted-by-M.Salter-11.18.25.pdf. And yet, as observed subsequently (text accompanying fns. 146–147), MCE has recently given 12.5 percent salary increases to its staff, thus affecting the FY 2026–27 budget prior to Board approval of that budget.
110 Ibid.
208
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 28 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes Caption: 2025 Staff Cost as a Percentage of Revenue at Top-10 CCAs. Source: Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers (CST), https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Public-Comment-Letter-submitted-by-M.Salter11.18.25.pdf, at pdf. p. 7.

Consistent with the findings in the audit mentioned above (noting that MCE’s energy costs rose in 2024 primarily because of increasing energy costs “and the timing and pricing of certain contracts”), MCE’s management has cited energy price volatility, combined with MCE’s policy to remain at the highest level of renewable energy, as the cause of the spike in energy contracts during that period.111 CST, as previously observed, disagrees, and has presented data indicating that MCE has underperformed in comparison with its CCA peers — all of which have faced similar energy market conditions — on a variety of FY 2024–25 financial metrics including:

Energy Revenue, Energy Cost, Net Energy Margin, Staff Cost per Revenue, Operating Margin and Return on Equity.112
After the contract signing violations of FY 2024–25, MCE’s unaudited financial statements for the first three quarters of FY 2025–26 are now trending in a positive direction. Following a first quarter operating loss of $26.9 million, second and third quarter gains made up for that initial loss, resulting in operating income of $19.8 million for the first nine months of FY 2025–26.113 In addition, in light of the Board’s vote in late 2025 to form a standing Finance Committee114 (after management and other Board members opposed doing so for more than two years), the 111 MCE, “Board Meetings” / “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors November 20, 2025 Video,” MCE Board Meeting November 20, 2025, at 1:52:17–2:26:05.
112 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Mathew Salter’s Request to Distribute Letter from Mimi Willard — Distributed November 19, 2025,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/PublicComment-Letter-submitted-by-M.Salter-11.18.25.pdf, pp. 5–6, figures II–VII. 113 MCE, “Key Documents” / “Unaudited Quarterly Financial Statements” / “MCE Q1 2025–26 Report (pdf),” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/MCE-2025-06-Financial-Statements.pdf, at pdf p. 3 (FY Q1); MCE, “Key Documents” / “Unaudited Quarterly Financial Statements” / “MCE Q2 2025–26 Report (pdf),” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/MCE-2025-09-Financial-Statements.pdf, at pdf p. 3 (FY Q2); MCE, “Key Documents” / “Unaudited Quarterly Financial Statements” / “MCE Q3 2025-26 Report (pdf),” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/MCE-2025-12-Financial-Statements.pdf, at pdf p. 3 (FY Q3).
114 MCE, “Board Meetings” / “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors November 20, 2025 Minutes,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/MCE-Board-Meeting-Minutes-November_2025.pdf, item

8. 209
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 29 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes Board may now be better positioned to avoid similar contracting decisions — decisions that have led to poor financial results relative to its peers.

The Grand Jury’s Conclusions About MCE’s Recent Energy Costs: MCE’s latest financial audit showed poor operating results stemming from questionable and costly short-term energy contracts signed at the peak of market prices. As noted earlier, this is at the heart of most recent public scrutiny, as these contracts, executed without meeting rules set by the Board, have resulted in financial consequences unusual for comparable CCAs. Positively trending operating income from unaudited financial statements for the first three quarters of FY 2025–26, plus the recent creation of a Finance Committee, are welcome developments — but it remains unclear whether MCE is armed with adequate professional financial governance and strategic planning resources necessary for the agency’s continuity.

6. MCE’s Board Should Consider Reducing Its Size And Changing Its Composition
As discussed earlier, MCE’s Board of Directors currently has 34 members — a substantial change from the original eight when it began operating in 2010. The expanded Board is a direct result of the increase in the communities served by MCE; each community is allotted one member. Local commentators115and experts in Board governance116 have observed that a 34- member Board is oddly large, cumbersome, and far from optimal. This view has been acknowledged by MCE members at recent Board meetings,117 and confirmed by many of those whom we interviewed in the course of our investigation. An influential 2010 study highlighted “the Rule of Seven: every person added to a decision-making group over seven reduces decision effectiveness by 10 percent” — and the study cautioned that even when a larger group is necessary, “organizations trying to make important decisions should limit the size of the group as much as possible.”118 A 2014 Wall Street Journal article, discussing a study conducted by the 115 Dick Spotswood, “MCE should reconsider board’s structure” (Nov.1, 2025) Marin Independent Journal, https://www.marinij.com/2025/11/01/dick-spotswood-mce-should-reconsider-boards-structure/; Commentary, Marin Voice, “Leadership needs to make some changes at MCE” (Feb. 4, 2026), Marin Independent Journal, https://www.marinij.com/2026/02/04/marin-voice-ceo-needs-to-make-some-changes-at-mce/. 116 See, e.g., Errol Biggs, “Best board size for optimal performance” (2011) Practical Governance Group, https://practicalgovernancegroup.com/best-board-size-optimal-performance/; The Diligent team, “Best practices:

Board size and corporate governance” (Sept. 25, 2017) Diligent, https://www.diligent.com/resources/blog/bestpractices-board-size-and-corporate-governance; Erin Walczewski, “Too Small, Too Big, Just Right: The Goldilocks Size for a Nonprofit Board” (Dec. 21, 2022) Gooly GO, https://www.cooleygo.com/too-small-too-big-just-right-thegoldilocks-size-for-a-nonprofitboard/#:~:text=For%20a%20new%20nonprofit%20organization,no%20greater%20than%20eleven%E2%80%9D%2 0directors.
117 See, e.g., MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “Board meeting — February 19, 2026 June 15, 2023,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWM0Adz38l0, at 3:06:25–3:06:40: “The fundamental problem [is] that MCE’s board is way too big.”
118 Marcia W. Blenko, Michael C. Mankins, and Paul Rogers, Decide & Deliver: 5 Steps to Breakthrough Performance in Your Organization (2010 Harv. Bus Rev. Press, Boston), p. 88. The report continued: “Of course, a larger group may sometimes be necessary to ensure buy-in. But organizations trying to make important decisions should limit the size of the group as much as possible.” Ibid. See also, e.g., Worklytics (Jan. 23, 2026) “12 Meeting Effectiveness Metrics to Improve Productivity (With Examples),” https://www.worklytics.co/blog/top-12-metricsfor-effective-meetings (“Research indicates that the ideal meeting size is somewhere between 3 and 8 participants.

Larger meetings tend to turn into information-sharing sessions and allow for far less individual participation.”) 210
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 30 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes governance research firm GMI Ratings, reported “more effective oversight of management with a smaller board,” and “[s]mall boards are more likely to dismiss CEOs for poor performance — a threat that declines significantly as boards grow in numbers.”119 Compared with its peer CCAs, MCE’s Board is more than double the average size of 14.6 members. Although we conclude that the Board is too large, we refrain from making a specific recommendation concerning its size because, we conclude, this matter should be the focus of the Board itself (possibly in the context of the upcoming governance review), and undertaken only after the Board has begun to reassert its authority by addressing the other internal deficiencies outlined in this report. As long as the Board remains its current size, it must find a way to make each meeting maximally efficient and prioritized in order to afford meaningful oversight by 34 members in the allotted meeting time.

Caption: Comparison of Board Size at MCE compared with Top-10 CCA Peers.

Source: Website of each CCA.

A related issue, raised multiple times in the context of our interviews, is that MCE’s Board members are busy, locally-elected officials, with other responsibilities. Some members may sit on the Board because they wish to encourage renewable energy, but lack both sophisticated financial and energy expertise, and the time required to execute fiduciary duties attendant to governing such a complex and technical enterprise. A contributing key challenge is turnover: In a given year, many Board members cycle off, and are replaced by new members. For example, in 2025, the Board lost, and absorbed, 15 members.120 Although MCE’s staff provides a Board orientation session121 for new members each year, that presentation affords only a broad overview of the agency, its customer programs, and how MCE purchases and delivers energy to 119 Joann S. Lublin, “Smaller Boards Get Bigger Returns” (Aug. 26, 2014) The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/smaller-boards-get-bigger-returns-1409078628. 120 By comparing the November 2024 and 2025 Board meetings minutes (see MCE, “Board Meetings” / “Meeting Archive,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/board-meetings/) we count 15 new members on the 2025 roster who were not on the 2024 roster.
121 E.g., MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Board Member Orientation February 20, 2025 Meeting Packet,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/MCE-Board-Meeting-Packet-February-2025.pdf. 211
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 31 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes customers. Significantly, as observed earlier (text and accompanying fns. 41–43), it does not sufficiently address or stress active governance by Board members.

Yet MCE competes in a market with sophisticated traders when it purchases electricity and trades renewable energy certificates / credits, and therefore needs Board members who are able to provide (or who can be educated to provide) corresponding focused governance. A 2009 Marin County Civil Grand Jury report, issued before MCE began operating, presciently questioned whether Board members would have “the professional expertise to compete in what has been a historically volatile and highly competitive business.”122 The same report predicted that “MCE will not be a primary concern” for Board members because they are “elected to govern other local entities.” The report opined: “This is not to say that they will not be diligent, but it does say that their already busy schedules will become busier.”123 True to that prediction, Board member absences at monthly full Board meetings (when neither the member nor alternate attended), where crucial voting takes place, have averaged 25 percent over the past year. (See table) In such an environment, Board members must necessarily rely on staff and management to fully disclose information without misdirection or obfuscation. For its part, management must clearly record and receive Board direction; faithfully execute Board policy decisions; and communicate in a way that can be understood by those not steeped in the technical minutiae of the energy market.

Caption: MCE Board Meeting Absences — 2025–April 2026. Source: MCE website meeting archives, https://mcecleanenergy.org/board-meetings/.

As previously observed, our review of MCE Board and committee meetings reveals that some members have, in recent months, invested considerable time and energy in their effort to fulfill their fiduciary and oversight duties. Yet, it is not apparent to us that all Board members endorse 122 Marin County Civil Grand Jury (Dec. 2, 2009) “Marin Clean Energy: Pull the Plug,” p. 5. 123 Id. at p. 13.
212
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 32 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes such an approach to the role. A February 2026 editorial in the Marin Independent Journal focused on that problem, noting: “Last year, in response to criticism of MCE’s management, one director said the questions were coming from small-town members who were not as busy as their colleagues who have other governmental responsibilities. That [referring to being busy] is exactly the problem.”124 In other words, as the editorial implied, the Board’s oversight is compromised by its large membership; the fact that many of its members are spread thin and often cannot commit sufficient time and energy; and most Board members lack professional experience in the complexities of energy procurement and related finance.

We find MCE at a juncture, and facing a variety of views on how to proceed: On one end of the spectrum, some Board members appear eager (or at least willing) to roll up their sleeves and more actively govern and exercise oversight — and to suggest management reassess its interactions with the Board. On the other end of the spectrum, some Board members appear comfortable allowing management to continue to exercise authority to, in essence, govern the Board. Dramatically exemplifying the latter stance — and apparently broadcasting a message of intolerance to internal criticism — the Board Chair has suggested that some members who have encouraged the full Board to undertake a greater oversight role should consider resigning from the Board if they cannot be “proud” of the Board as it stands.125 As observed earlier, the Board as a whole has endorsed, and is in the midst of a governance assessment project that will be completed well after the filing of this report. If it is to address the shortcomings we have noted, that assessment will need to (1) be robust (covering all aspects of MCE — the Board, management, and staff), (2) conducted by a neutral and widely-respected evaluator, and (3) consider and make recommendations about the size and composition of the Board — changes that may require amendments to MCE’s foundational and organizational documents.126 We hope the Board will, in connection with that project, eventually reach appropriate consensus about the scope and extent of its governance role. In the meantime, we think the Board should more actively govern and exercise oversight, consistent with the suggestions of some critics and Board members, and demand from management transparency, and compliance with required procedures.
124 Marin IJ Editorial Board, “MCE right to remove overstatement from messaging” (Feb. 1, 2026), https://www.marinij.com/2026/02/01/editorial-mce-right-to-remove-untrue-statement-from-branding/. 125 At MCE’s November 2025 Board meeting, the Chair of the Board, addressing members who had voiced constructive criticism and advocated for enhanced financial oversight, stated: “Right now it feels like we’re divided, and we shouldn’t be serving, being divided…. Our community members expect us to serve … and be respectful of each other [and] … staff.” So I’m hoping that for the rest of this meeting we can also continue to be respectful of each other in the process.” MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors November 20, 2025 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/embed/s79p9jam__4, at 23:30–24:21, italics added. Later in the same meeting, the Chair elaborated on her view that some members should not remain as Board members: “I’m really disheartened, saddened how the Board direction is going…. [W]e’re serving at the will of our council because they have appointed us to serve on these boards … and … ultimately … if we’re gonna serve on the Board, we should be proud of the Board we serve on, and if it doesn’t represent what we stand for or our communities then we should let our council know that that doesn’t represent, and that we shouldn’t be a part of that board.” Id. at 4:22:43–4:23:26, italics added. 126 Knowledgeable persons we interviewed suggested town managers might be tasked with operational details about CCAs. This approach would require revision of MCE’s JPA. 213
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 33 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes The Grand Jury’s Conclusions About Board Size and Composition: A smaller and more technically oriented Board (much like a board of a public company this size) is likely to be more effective for the future of MCE. The unwieldy nature of a Board with 34 members has presented management with both educational challenges and opportunities to consolidate control. The anticipated governance assessment project might provide useful guidance — but only if that assessment is robust, and conducted by a neutral and widely-respected evaluator.

7. MCE Management Has Been Insufficiently Transparent With Its Board
Based on our review of recent extensive MCE Board and committee meetings, and statements from persons we have interviewed, we find that MCE management has been insufficiently transparent — and indeed, often evasive — in its communications with and to MCE’s Board.

Management too frequently (1) provides incomplete responses to Board members’ questions and requests for information; (2) obfuscates or conflates issues and details; (3) fails to inform the Board of important actions as required, or informs the Board late or after-the-fact; and (4) limits legitimate inquiries and comments from Board members who question management. This behavior markedly limits the Board’s ability to exercise its fiduciary oversight duties to MCE’s ratepayers. We provide several recent examples (among others) below. ● Failure to provide complete responses to Board members’ questions and requests for information
○ At the November 20, 2025, Board meeting, a member requested more information regarding the one-to-five-year energy contracts signed in FY 2024–25, worth about $200 million. The same Board member made the same request at the January 5, 2026 Executive Committee meeting, and again at the February 6, 2026 Technical Committee meeting.127 As of early May, the Board member still had not received the requested information.
○ When a Board member asked at the February 2, 2026, Executive Committee meeting about the extent of natural gas purchases related to MCE’s “Resource Adequacy” contracts signed in 2022 and 2025, management evaded the question, and instead referred to the fact that MCE’s Power Content Label is not required to include those types of contracts.128
○ MCE’s six-member Technical Committee meets monthly in public. Its scope is “to explore, discuss and provide direction or approval on issues related to electricity supply, distributed generation, greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency, procurement risk management and other topics of a technical 127 MCE, “Board Meetings” / “Meeting Archive” / “Technical Committee February 6, 2026 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1Nek55DYLU, at 1:18:25–1:19:10 (describing the three requests). 128 MCE, “Board Meetings” / “Meeting Archive” / “Executive Committee February 2, 2026 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZhnn8fa7vU, at 22:39–23:33. This response was preceded and followed by the statement that management “would be happy to talk to [the Director] about that afterward” [meaning after the Board meeting], and the comment, “I think we have already covered [the resource adequacy contracts] in detail.” We have seen these kinds of statements (appearing to both put off a direct answer, and redirect the conversation) numerous times during Board meetings, in response to direct questions. 214
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 34 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes nature.”129 Yet MCE limits the sharing of requested key aspects of energy contracts with these Board members,130 even after these contracts have been entered into, on the ground that public release of this sensitive information should be avoided to protect MCE’s competitive market interests.131 However, we have been informed that MCE reports about these contracts in greater detail publicly to the California Energy Commission — listing specific power plants, suppliers, and resource characteristics not shared with its own Board, which sees such contracts only with such information omitted.132
● Obfuscating or conflating issues and details
○ MCE management obfuscated information about a key rules amendment to remove the Board’s authority to hire the General Counsel. For reasons explained earlier (text and accompanying fn. 47), and described in detail in the Appendix, we question whether the Board was fully aware of the significant change that it made when approving that key amendment.
○ Regarding one of the main types of renewable energy contracts that MCE enters into, MCE management has stated that its costly “Product Content Category 1” (PCC 1) contracts133 (see definition in fn. 65) are “bundled”134 — meaning, these energy contracts are for renewable power accompanied by a “Renewable Energy Certificate” (REC) (see definition in fn. 65), which is required in order for MCE to claim it is providing a cleaner (greener) product to the public. Yet, as discussed earlier (see text and accompanying fns. 77–83), knowledgeable observers associated with the energy industry have characterized such purchases as “attribute-only” contracts on the grounds that, under these contracts, only the REC “greenness” claim — and no actual energy — is purchased. In this regard, an industry expert has told the Board: “MCE does not pay for the energy; they don’t schedule the energy … and they have to hedge the energy by buying system 129 MCE, “Board Meetings” / “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors September 18, 2025 Meeting Packet,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/MCE-Board-Meeting-Packet-September-2025.pdf , at pdf p. 15.
130 MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Executive Committee January 5, 2026 Meeting Packet” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/MCE-Executive-Committee-MeetingPacket_January_2026.pdf, item 5.C.2 (“Corrections to Marin IJ & Misinformation”), at pdf p. 10: “MCE is a public entity, subject to the Brown Act and is therefore required to make public all information presented to its Board and Standing Committees. Unlike our private competitors, we are not able to conduct private meetings with the Board or its Standing Committees to discuss market-sensitive information.” 131 Cal. Gov. Code §§ 54950–54963.
132 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment Letter from Nick Pappas — Distributed

2.19.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Public-Comment-from-Nick-Pappas-Distributed2.19.26.pdf, at pdf p. 6. 133 These contracts cost $179 million in FY 2024–25, and $131 million in the FY 2025–26 budget. MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “Board Meeting Retreat, October 16, 2025 Meeting Packet,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/MCE-Board-Retreat-Meeting-Packet-October-2025.pdf, at pdf p. 24 (regarding FY 2024–25) and MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “MCE Executive Committee Meeting Supplemental Packet: Monday, March 2, 2026,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/02/MCE-Executive-Committee-Meeting-Supplemental-Packet-March_2026.pdf, at pdf p. 210 (regarding the FY 2025–26 budget).
134 MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors October 16, 2025 Meeting Packet,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/MCE-Board-Retreat-Meeting-Packet-October-2025.pdf, pdf p. 37.
215
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 35 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes power [i.e., including from fossil fuels] in the market.”135 When industry observers have criticized MCE for regularly entering into such expensive contracts as a key part of its portfolio, MCE management has often merely characterized such “PCC 1” contracts as “the gold standard.”136 Based on our own review, we are not satisfied that MCE has directly addressed these observers’ critiques of such contracts.
○ Two additional categories of energy contracts, “Financial Hedges” and “Resource Adequacy” (RA), constitute MCE’s other two large energy costs — $288 million and $159 million, respectively, in FY 2024–25; and $267 million and $146 million, respectively, in the FY 2025–26 budget.137 Energy industry experts (including, most recently, the Sierra Club) have asserted that MCE’s hedges and RA purchases are often sourced from fossil fuel suppliers.138 Indeed, the California Public Utility Commission’s latest report shows MCE as supplying more fossil fuel through its RA contracts than any other northern California CCA; but only 16 percent of MCE’s RA comes from clean sources, compared to more than 30 percent for most of its Bay Area peers.139 These purchases are technically neither part of MCE’s energy portfolio, nor included in MCE’s advertised Power Content Label (and hence not considered regarding MCE’s “green energy” claims). However, because MCE does not explicitly acknowledge the nature of these transactions, Board members may be unaware of the extent to which fossil fuel energy may, under some circumstances, be added to the grid through MCE’s purchases.
135 MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “Technical Committee, March 6, 2026 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YTsteawCJk&t=1723s at 1:17:23–1:17:33. (Note also the entire comment and explanation, at 1:16:08–1:19:10.)
136 MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “MCE Technical Committee Meeting March 6, 2026 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YTsteawCJk&t=1723s, at 1:42:50–14:42:55. 137 See sources cited in fn. 133.
138 MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment Letter from Nick Pappas — Distributed

2.19.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Public-Comment-from-Nick-Pappas-Distributed2.19.26.pdf, at pdf p. 6 (“Hedges and RA are the key channels through which MCE maintains financial relationships with fossil energy suppliers, with correspondingly important environmental policy considerations which are not currently being discussed with the Board”). The Sierra Club asserts similarly. Regarding RA, it says: “We understand [based on MCE’s FY 2026–27 budget that it] … continues to spend approximately half of its budget on fossil energy products, including both unspecified hedge energy ($225 million) and RA contracts ($105 million) which are primarily provided by natural gas suppliers.” The Sierra Club characterizes MCE’s “energy hedges” as “simply gas transactions which are structured to evade state reporting requirements for gas energy purchases. Under this structure, MCE enters a fixed price arrangement with a broker; in turn, the broker enters into a contract with a natural gas power plant to provide energy and cover their exposure in the market. While these transactions are not inherently with gas suppliers, that is the typical course of action for the ‘Peak’ and ‘Offpeak’ products shown in MCE’s state reports. MCE has entered into dozens of these ‘hedge’ transactions in recent years.” MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment Letter from Julia Dowell — Distributed 4.15.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Public-Comment-Letter-Julia-Dowell-4.15.26.pdf, at pdf pp. 4–5.
139 California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division, “2023 Resource Adequacy Report” (Aug. 2025), https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/-/media/cpuc-website/divisions/energy-division/documents/resource-adequacyhomepage/2023-resource-adequacy-reportv2.pdf#page=70, at pdf p. 70. Citing the same report, the Sierra Club observes: “Sonoma Clean Power, a neighboring CCA formed several years after MCE, met 45% of its RA with clean resources in the same year; CleanPower SF, Central Coast Community Energy, Peninsula Clean Energy, and Silicon Valley Clean Energy all doubled MCE’s performance.” MCE, “Written Public Comment Submissions” / “Public Comment Letter from Julia Dowell — Distributed 4.15.26,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2026/04/Public-Comment-Letter-Julia-Dowell-4.15.26.pdf, at pdf p. 5. 216
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 36 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes ○ In developing meeting agendas, management often provides much information about seemingly less significant items that consume significant time, and leaves less opportunity to address more important items. For example, at the October 2025 Board retreat meeting, staff provided an hour-long (plus continuation after lunch not on the video) detailed presentation about Virtual Power Plants (VPPs)140 that, now and through at least 2028, will comprise only one-quarter of one percent of energy provided at peak hours.141
● Failure to inform the Board of important actions in a timely manner — or doing so after-the-fact
○ In June of 2024, MCE’s then Chief Financial Officer (CFO) departed to take a position at another CCA (Sonoma Clean Power).142 After more than a year of operating without a CFO, MCE’s Finance Vice President was promoted to the vacant CFO position in mid-October 2025. Yet the Board was not formally notified of that critical promotion, and many learned of it only by reviewing the staff roster embedded in the Minutes of the October 16, 2025 Board meeting: a roster of Board meeting attendees, posted approximately one week after the October meeting, showed the former Finance Vice President’s title had changed to CFO.143 After the CEO formally announced the appointment a month later at a Board meeting, one member asked: “In light of the public scrutiny and amidst calls for greater transparency and accountability, why was someone promoted into the CFO role without prior consultation with the Board and without running an open search process?”144 In response, the CEO ignored the inquiry concerning absence of consultation and, without explaining the lack of communication, simply asserted that management had followed the policy set by the Board several years earlier (which delegated staff hiring and promotions to the CEO).145 ○ At a February 2026 budget workshop Board meeting, when presenting the proposed FY 2026–27 staff compensation budget line-item, the Board learned that merit and promotional salary increases had been approved by the CEO on January 1, 2026, affecting the FY 2026–27 budget prior to Board approval of that budget.146 The proposed staff compensation budget, including proposed new hires, reflected a substantial 12.5 percent increase, from $29.5 million approved in FY 2025–26 to $33.2 million proposed for FY 2026–27, and averaged about $277,000 over the 120 MCE full-time positions.147 This budget front-running was 140 MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “Board Meeting Retreat, October 16, 2025 Meeting Packet,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/MCE-Board-Retreat-Meeting-Packet-October-2025.pdf, item 8.
141 MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “Board Meeting Retreat, October 16, 2025 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/embed/p3El_5z3j0o, at 3:25:45.
142 Sonoma Clean Power, “Sonoma Clean Power Welcomes Industry Leader Garth Salisbury as New CFO,” https://cal-cca.org/sonoma-clean-power-welcomes-industry-leader-garth-salisbury-as-new-cfo/. 143 MCE,“Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “Board Meeting Retreat, October 16, 2025 Minutes,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/MCE-Board-Retreat-Meeting-Minutes-October_2025.pdf. 144 MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors November 20, 2025 Video,” MCE Board Meeting November 20, 2025, at 56:31–57:55 (announcement) & 1:03:21–1:03:40 (Board member question). 145 Id. at 1:03:40–1:04:30.
146 MCE, “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors February 11, 2026 Special Meeting,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/MCE-Board-Budget-Workshop-2-Meeting-PacketFebruary-2026.pdf, at pdf p. 58. (MCE’s fiscal year runs from April 1 through March 31.) 147 Calculated as follows: $33.2 million (ibid. at p. 58) covering MCE staff of 120 (id. at p. 60). 217
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 37 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes announced, ironically, while discussing how to find cost savings and cut MCE’s rates in order to compete with PG&E’s recent rate cuts that leave an average MCE customer with substantially higher bills than PG&E charges. ○ Although MCE’s internal staff includes a ten-member group of power resource professionals,148 MCE also has for 16 years contracted with a small energy consulting firm, Pacific Energy Advisors (PEA),149 to augment this staff in various ways, including energy product procurement and power contract negotiation.150 We have been told, in our interviews, that PEA has predominant influence — even over MCE’s own internal staff professionals — in these matters. MCE management has been granted authority to select consultants such as PEA, and yet the full Board has little insight concerning that contract. Neither has the Board nor its Technical Committee been consulted about whether to issue a Request for Proposal concerning PEA’s services, so that the Board might be able to periodically evaluate this strategically important contracting decision that goes to the core of MCE’s main function.
● Limiting inquiries and comments from Board members who attempt to question management
○ In late-January 2025, MCE’s Executive Committee (“ExCom”) Chair sent an email to the CEO with a list of financial topics and reports for future committee agenda discussions compiled by a four-person subset of the then 11-member committee.151 The ExCom Chair clarified that the list was “not a set of demands but rather is meant to be a collaborative next step in an ongoing dialogue of what would be useful for ExCom to understand about the agency we’re tasked with supporting and providing oversight of on behalf of our cities and residents.”152 The CEO responded that some items listed were out-of-scope or would consume too much staff time.153 In addition, the CEO (in conjunction with General Counsel) cited potential violations of the Brown Act (the open public meetings law)154 — even though the subgroup of requesting directors did not create a quorum — on the ground that the four-person discussion might possibly (and inadvertently) lead to a prohibited serial communication under the Act.155 By this, and for these stated reasons, the ExCom’s request was not considered. ○ In a November 2025 email sent to all Board members, management admonished certain Board members for asking questions that any fiduciary who takes an 148 MCE, “Board Meetings”/ “Meeting Archive” / “MCE Board Orientation Meeting Packet February 20, 2025,”.https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/MCE-Board-Orientation-MeetingPacket_February_20_2025.pdf, at pdf p. 49. 149 PEA, http://pacificea.com/. PEA serves numerous other CCAs in addition to MCE. See http://pacificea.com/clients/ (listing, among 11 other clients, Silicon Valley Energy, Clean Power SF, and Sonoma Clean Power).
150 PEA, http://pacificea.com/clients/marin-clean-energy-mce/ (listing services provided to MCE). See also MCE, “Board Meetings” / “Meeting Archive” / “MCE Board Meeting November 20, 2025 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/embed/s79p9jam__4, at 1:22:09–1:45:17 (PEA presentation to the Board). 151 This email, and the resulting email chain, has been shared with the Grand Jury by MCE Board members, and we have retained a copy in our files.
152 See fn. 151.
153 See fn. 151.
154 Cal. Gov. Code §§ 54950–54963.
155 See fn. 151.
218
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 38 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes oversight role seriously might pose to MCE staff — concerning, for example, audit information, financial reports, and energy cost trends. The email included an attachment entitled “Staff time allocation on board requests” listing all instances of requests from Board members over the past year. Although staff time is important, management’s email could be interpreted as an effort to reduce Board oversight, and embarrass those reasonably seeking desirable oversight information.
○ We have noticed various instances at Board meetings when members’ comments have been limited by MCE’s CEO, and /or by General Counsel. We relate here just one example: At the November 2025 Board meeting, during a discussion about a “Summary of Approved Contracts,” one member voiced questions about the approval process regarding MCE’s one-to-five year energy contracts — asking who had approved; which appropriate committee had been consulted, and when, etc.156 In the process, when that Board member attempted to explain to other members some relevant “background” about recent “energy costs” leading to a $200 million increase over the prior year,157 the Board member was interrupted four times by General Counsel.158 After a second Board member objected to the interruptions,159 the first Board member was able to complete the comments.160 A third Board member then thanked the first member for that analysis, and commented that it helped “bring[] greater transparency.”161 And yet, we note, this greater transparency occurred only after insistence by a few Board members — and in spite of MCE management’s efforts to curtail discussion.

The Grand Jury’s Conclusions About How Management Interacts With the Board:

Managerial behavior such as we have described above inhibits, rather than facilitates, Board governance. Although we have found that MCE’s Board has often failed or declined to embrace its governance role, the driving force behind this result appears to be management’s acts, omissions, and communications.

Admittedly, MCE management faces a difficult challenge in working with a large Board of elected officials, many of whom lack specific energy and finance experience — and many of whom quickly rotate on and off the Board. But in order for MCE to succeed, the Board should require management to:
156 MCE, “Board Meetings” / “Meeting Archive” / “Board of Directors November 20, 2025 Video,” https://www.youtube.com/embed/s79p9jam__4, at 1:11:41–1:12:22. The full discussion of this issue ranged from 1:11:41–1:21:24.
157 Id., at 1:14:54–1:16:58.
158 Id., at 1:16:59–1:17:28.
159 Id., at 1:17:50–1:17:58.
160 Id., at 1:18:01–1:19:04. The member explained that “sixty percent of these short-term contracts … were executed in” August–October 2024, “and so in hindsight, we signed [those] … contracts at the peak of the market. This … is the cause of our $200 million increase year-over-year in energy costs. And so I would like to recommend that we revisit Board Resolution 2020-04, which provides the CEO with authority to sign these short term contracts. I think we need to implement some guardrails and checkpoints to make sure we have a good handle on what is happening with our short-term contracts.” (Italics added.)
161 Id., at 1:19:45–1:19:57.
219
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 39 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes (1) Work cooperatively with the Board to prioritize agendas to focus on important governance issues;
(2) Share difficult news early, rather than late, and actively consult regarding key staff changes, thus building trust;
(3) Invite — and constructively receive and respond to — valid criticism; and (4) Clearly and consistently summarize pros and cons of all key decisions facing the Board, instead of providing only management’s opinion or preferred option.

In the meantime, the Board can require observance of MCE’s internal control rules, and update and reinforce those rules as necessary to ensure operational transparency, so that the Board may exercise its proper governance role.

FINDINGS
In light of our investigation described above, we find as follows:

F1. MCE’s Board as a whole has not played a sufficiently active role in key agency decisions including reviewing policies and future strategy, and setting / evaluating performance metrics for management.

F2. The Board needs — but in recent years has not received — adequate and independent legal advice. Having ceded approval authority over the hiring of MCE’s General Counsel to the CEO in 2023, the Board has diminished its ability to govern.

F3. The Board’s size and composition make it difficult for the Board to govern.

F4. Many Board members have — quite understandably — limited expertise regarding a large and complex company such as MCE.

F5. All MCE Board members are local elected officials who face competing demands on their limited time and resources; as a result, meeting attendance has often been poor, and insufficient for optimally effective governance.

F6. Energy contracts at the heart of MCE’s business are technical and complex. Board members face a considerable challenge to understand the costs, risks, and policy implications of MCE’s energy contracts — and the relationship between those contracts and the actual “greenness” of the electricity that MCE provides to its customers.

F7. The Board lacks sufficient visibility into the work of its contracted power purchasing agent and technical consultant (Pacific Energy Advisors) — an entity that has substantial influence over MCE’s business operations, and also purchases for (and advises) other CCAs in this market.

F8. The Board has not received from management an adequate and understandable explanation of the almost $200 million year-over-year increase in energy costs in FY 2024–25.

F9. Management has at times invoked confidentiality / market competitiveness concerns when providing the Board or individual members with only limited details about energy contracts (even though greater details are publicly reported on the California Energy Commission’s website), thus impairing Board members’ contemporaneous awareness about key aspects of MCE’s business.
220
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 40 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes F10. Management has been, at some times and in key respects, insufficiently transparent with the Board, as it has (1) provided incomplete responses to Board members’ questions and requests for information; (2) obfuscated or conflated issues and details; (3) failed to inform the Board of important actions in a timely manner or done so after-the-fact; and (4) limited legitimate inquiries and comments from Board members who attempt to question management.

F11. The Board has ceded control of its own meetings by relinquishing its responsibility over the creation of meeting agendas. This has contributed to meeting inefficiency and bloated meeting packets.

F12. The process for amending the agency’s foundational rules — its Operating Rules and Regulations — has not been consistently and rigorously followed. As a result, the Grand Jury questions whether all relevant materials were made available to Board members and the public (in accordance with the Brown Act) in advance of the Board taking actions.

F13. Management has repeatedly violated key internal controls, including “Resolution 2020-04” and “authorization chain” documents, requiring consultation about, and approval of, oneto-five year energy contracts.

F14. MCE has grown from a small company to its significant size today, yet its foundational documents have not been amended to reflect its increased scale and complexity.

RECOMMENDATIONS
In light of the discussion in the body of our report, and the findings described above, we recommend as follows:

R1. By September 30, 2026, MCE’s Board of Directors should review whether its current delegation of authority provides adequate oversight regarding contract approval, setting / evaluating performance metrics for senior management, and overall company strategy.

R2. By December 31, 2026, the Board should amend its Operating Rules and Regulations to reinstate approval authority for hiring of the CEO and General Counsel, to require Board approval for hiring all C-level employees, and to require an open, competitive process for all such hiring.

R3. By December 31, 2026, the Board should determine whether its current size and composition are impediments to oversight and governance.

R4. By December 31, 2026, the Board should revise its Operating Rules and Regulations to regain responsibility for jointly creating meeting agendas in order to improve meeting efficiency and prioritization of agenda items.

R5. By December 31, 2026, all of MCE’s Marin jurisdictions (and preferably, all 38 jurisdictions covered by MCE) should implement a process by which its appointed Board member (or, in that person’s absence, the designated alternate member) commits to attending each regular Board meeting.

R6. By December 31, 2026, all of MCE’s Marin jurisdictions (and preferably, all 38 jurisdictions covered by MCE) should reassess their appointments of chosen Board members to prioritize those with the most extensive financial and energy expertise. 221
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 41 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes R7. By March 31, 2027, the MCE Board should evaluate whether changes to Board composition or access to energy expertise would improve oversight and governance, and if necessary, consider amending its Joint Powers Agreement to allow the governing body of each jurisdiction to appoint and designate a Board member (or alternate Board member) who is not a member of its governing body, but who has strong energy industry experience and can commit to serve for multiple years.

R8. By December 31, 2026, the Board should review and assess the value to ratepayers of certain costly contracts that may serve primarily to allow MCE to claim a higher renewable Power Content Label.

R9. By December 31, 2026, the MCE Board should hire an impartial, outside auditor to provide a comprehensive review of energy contracts executed in FY 2024–25, including review of cost, capacity, length of contract, fuel source, facility location and approval processes, in order to avoid future similar recurring contract variances and overruns.

R10. By December 31, 2026, the Board should conduct an internal review concerning the apparent April 2023 elevation of then-Associate General Counsel to the position of General Counsel, in order to determine whether that elevation occurred consistently with MCE’s then-operative Operating Rules and Regulations.

R11. Initially by December 31, 2026 and periodically thereafter, the Board should direct management to issue a Request for Proposal concerning (1) services provided by independent energy consultants, and (2) services of all other consultants when the duration or cost exceeds a de minimis amount (as defined by the Board).

R12. By December 31, 2026, the Board should review its August 17, 2023 amendment of its Operating Rules and Regulations to determine if, in doing so, (1) the Board received adequate and independent legal advice, and (2) whether MCE and the Board complied with the public inspection requirements of the Brown Act, California’s open public meetings law.

R13. By March 31, 2027, the Board should review its existing policies and internal controls to determine whether they are consistent with and adequate for a company approaching one billion dollars in revenue.

REQUIRED RESPONSES
Pursuant to Penal Code section 933.05, the Grand Jury requires responses from the following governing bodies within 90 days:
● MCE Board of Directors: (F1–F14, R1–R4, R7–R13)
● Marin County Board of Supervisors: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council: City of Belvedere (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council: City of Larkspur (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council: City of Mill Valley (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council: City of Novato (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council: City of San Rafael (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council: City of Sausalito (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● Town Council: Town of Corte Madera (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● Town Council: Town of Fairfax (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● Town Council: Town of Ross (F4–F5, R5–R6)
222
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 42 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes ● Town Council: Town of San Anselmo (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● Town Council: Town of Tiburon (F4–F5, R5–R6)
The governing bodies listed above should be aware that the comment or response of the governing body must be conducted in accordance with Penal Code section 933, subdivision (c), and subject to the notice, agenda and open meeting requirements of the Brown Act.

INVITED RESPONSES
● Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors: (F4–F5, R5–R6) ● Napa County Board of Supervisors: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● Solano County Board of Supervisors: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Benicia: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Concord: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of El Cerrito: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Fairfield: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Hercules: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Lafayette: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Martinez: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Napa: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Oakley: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Pinole: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Pittsburg: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Pleasant Hill: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Richmond: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of San Pablo: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of San Ramon: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Vallejo: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● City Council of Walnut Creek: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● Town Council of Danville: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● Town Council of Moraga: (F4–F5, R5–R6)
● State of California Senate — Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee: (F1, F6- F9, F12, F14, R1, R7–R9, R11, R13)
● MCE CEO (F1–F14)
Note: At the time this report was prepared information was available at the websites cited.

Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Civil Grand Jury. The California Legislature has stated that it intends Penal Code section 929 to encourage full candor in testimony in Grand Jury investigations by protecting the privacy and confidentiality of those who participate in any Civil Grand Jury investigation.
223
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 43 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes APPENDIX — Regarding the Hiring of General Counsel
The following timeline documents an investigation performed by the Grand Jury to understand the process by which (1) MCE’s current General Counsel assumed that role in the organization in or about April 2023, and thereafter (2) MCE’s Board amended its Operating Rules and Regulations to grant to the CEO, for the first time, authority to hire General Counsel without Board approval.

We undertake this detailed review for overlapping reasons. First, the timeline serves as an example illustrating how (as we have observed in other circumstances) MCE’s management and CEO often operates with respect to the Board — by engaging in a course of conduct that tends to obfuscate rather than highlight key issues. Second, the timeline documents significant findings in our report related to a key problem that, we have found, has impaired the Board’s ability to govern — the Board needs, but in recent years has not received, adequate independent legal advice.

All documents referred to in this timeline are available on MCE’s website as of this writing, with URL addresses as indicated. We begin with the facts, and end with our observations and conclusions.

The Rules for Hiring General Counsel Include Board Approval

1. MCE’s original “Operating Rules and Regulations” (OR&R) is posted on its website at https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/operating-rules-regulations-asammended.pdf.

This original OR&R document lists in its article VII, section 2, various important activities over which the Board exercises control. This particular provision of the OR&R specifies, as a matter that “shall be approved only by a majority vote of the full membership of the Board,” the following: “b. The hiring of an Executive Director and General Counsel.” Id. at pdf p. 4, italics added. (This undated document shows the subtitle “As Amended.” An MCE memorandum describes this version of the OR&R as having been “adopted in March 2009.”) https://www.mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/MCE-Board-Meeting-PacketJune-2023.pdf, at pdf p. 84, fn. 2.)

2. In addition to its foundational OR&R, MCE also periodically adopts various resolutions that express Board policy consistent with the OR&R. Among many such resolutions passed over the years is (adopted in September of 2018) “Resolution 2018-09,” https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/10/Resolution-2018-09-Delegating-Auth.-of-Setting-Comp.-Tenure-Appt.- and-Cond.-of-Emplymnt-to-ExCom-and-CEO-1.pdf. Resolution 2018-09 provides, in its section 1: “The Board hereby delegates to MCE’s … CEO … in consultation with the Executive Committee, the authority to prescribe the compensation of all MCE officers, other than the CEO, and provide the number, compensation, tenure, appointment and conditions of employment of MCE employees, provided that such prescription and provision be consistent with the Boardapproved budget.” Id. at pdf p. 1. As will become more apparent shortly, we question whether, in light of the fundamental and specific OR&R provision requiring full Board approval, which expressly names General Counsel, any inconsistent or ambiguous Board resolution can control 224
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 44 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes when hiring (or promoting, or advancing) General Counsel. More specifically, Resolution 2018- 09, quoted above, is both subservient to the OR&R, and general in its language (“appointment … of MCE employees”), and its implementation with respect to General Counsel would appear to require amendment to the otherwise controlling OR&R.

General Counsel is Hired Without Board Approval

3. As of February 16, 2023, Catalina Murphy was consistently shown on memoranda to the Board (in meeting packets), and in minutes of Board meetings, as “Associate General Counsel.” See https://www.mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/MCE-Board-Meeting-PacketFebruary-2023.pdf, at pdf pp. 18 and 26. Yet, as of April 20, 2023, Catalina Murphy is shown in similar memoranda as “General Counsel.” See (https://www.mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/04/MCE-Board-Meeting-Packet-April-2023.pdf, at pdf pp. 45 and 63.

Based on our review of MCE’s Board meeting Minutes circa 2021–early 2023, it appears this position had been vacant for at least eight months. At this time, approval of the hiring of General Counsel was still subject to a “majority vote of the full membership of the Board” under the OR&R quoted in paragraph #1 above. However, we have found no evidence indicating any Board vote of approval concerning this hiring; neither have we found any announcement (or entry in the Minutes) about this change in status. Nor have we found any evidence that the Executive Committee was consulted about the change in General Counsel, as would have been required by Resolution 2018-09, quoted in paragraph #2 above.

After Missing Board Approval, a Change in the Rules — Step 1: Highlight “Minimal Changes,” With No Mention of General Counsel

4. The June 15, 2023, Board Meeting Packet included proposed amendments to the OR&R. It also included an introductory memorandum, authored jointly by MCE’s Associate General Counsel and its new General Counsel, Catalina Murphy. The memorandum’s opening passages identified four “minimal changes” proposed for the OR&R. These changes were: (1) updating MCE’s name; (2) streamlining the description of the Board Chair’s duties regarding agendas; (3) extending the term of the Board secretary; and (4) changing the month for the annual Board election. The memorandum’s list of changes did not mention any change in Board approval of hiring General Counsel. See https://www.mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/06/MCE-Board-Meeting-Packet-June-2023.pdf, at pdf pp. 84–85.

Consistent with counsel’s memorandum, the proposed amendments to the OR&R in this packet included these four “minimal changes,” yet no change to the Board’s then-existing power: the requirement that the Board must approve the hiring of General Counsel. Id., at pdf pp. 89 and 94.

5. But in a subsequent Supplemental Packet for the same June 15, 2023 Board meeting, clean and redlined documents showed, for the first time, a proposed amendment of the OR&R striking Board authority to approve the hiring of General Counsel. See https://www.mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/6.15.23-Supplemental-MeetingPacket.pdf, at pdf pp. 16 & 21. We found no additional or updated memorandum highlighting this change from the earlier June packet, no comment from staff addressing this change, and no 225
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 45 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes indication when this supplemental packet was transmitted to the Board. This two-packet submission to the Board, again without explanation, we will see again in this timeline.

6. With these two versions of the OR&R submitted to the Board on June 15 the proposed changes to the OR&R was presented for action.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/VQPtcrnYMBA, at 38:14. Associate legal counsel summarized relevant history, explaining that the Executive Committee reviewed MCE’s formation documents at its February 2023 meeting, and concluded the OR&R should be updated to incorporate “minimal changes.” Counsel explained that the Executive Committee “then formed an ad hoc committee, tasked with providing a recommendation to the Board on this matter. The resulting document from the ad hoc committee meeting is the proposed amendment to MCE Operating Rules and Regulations, which can be found in attachment A of item number 7.” Id. at 38:28– 39:16. (We note that both meeting packets contain an attachment “A” concerning item number

7.) Counsel then listed a “quick summary of the proposed revisions,” specifically describing the same four items mentioned earlier in paragraph #4 above — but again, counsel did not mention any change regarding Board approval of the position of General Counsel. Id. at 39:17–40:00.

Step 2: Management Characterizes Change in Rules as “Alignment”

7. Counsel next turned to the recently circulated Supplemental Packet, stating:
“It came to our attention after the first packet was released that there did need to be an additional edit to align with Resolution 2018-09 [quoted in paragraph #2 above] … , which delegated the authority of setting compensation, number, tenure, appointment, and conditions of employment aside from the CEO position to the Chief Executive Officer, so long as these actions are consistent with the Board-approved budget. So, we’ve made that additional edit. You’ll find it in the redline.” Id. at 40:07–40:40.

Counsel did not advise whether the Executive Committee reviewed and approved that “additional edit” as required, when that edit was made, what was being “aligned,” or to whom “we” referred. Taken by its own terms, counsel’s statement says that an inconsistency between Resolution 2018-09 and the OR&R had been identified, and that someone determined that the OR&R must be “aligned” with the resolution. Counsel’s statement also implies that determination was made by counsel, without consultation by the ad hoc committee, and only after the first packet was released for the June 15 Board meeting.

Counsel’s last quoted passage (inset above) — a recitation that focused on delegated compensation and related authority, but did not include any of the key terms, “approve,” “hire,” or, most importantly, “General Counsel,” and said nothing about the process by which the (late) Supplemental Packet was produced for Board action — was the full extent of the explanation to the Board about the newly-inserted amendment to strike from the OR&R the Board’s longstanding authority to approve the hiring of General Counsel. We conclude that this explanation, delivered immediately before the Board’s vote, can most charitably be characterized as less-than-transparent. Indeed, it appears to have been phrased to obfuscate, rather than illuminate, the fact that the Board was about to remove from its fundamental OR&R, 226
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 46 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes the key authority to approve the hiring of General Counsel, a power that it had possessed since MCE’s inception in 2009.

The Board Chair asked for any public comment; there was none. Id. at 45:16–45:22. The Board then proceeded to its first vote, apparently passing the Supplemental Packet amendments to the OR&R Packet unanimously. Id. at 49:02–50:39. However, pursuant to the OR&R itself, changing that fundamental document is a two-step process; this first vote was therefore provisional, requiring confirmation by a second vote at the next Board meeting, which would be held August 17, 2023.

Step 3: Management Again Highlights “Minimal Changes” — and Again Does Not Mention General Counsel

8. The August 17, 2023 Board Meeting Packet showed most of the OR&R amendments that had been provisionally approved in June 2023. See https://www.mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/08/MCE-Board-Meeting-Packet-August-2023.pdf, at pdf pp. 21–25 (redlined). Yet confusingly — and apparently failing to reflect the Board’s June vote described in paragraph #7 above — the August packet showed no amendment to the OR&R removing the Board’s authority to approve the hiring of General Counsel. (As an aside, this packet also did not show the names of MCE’s member jurisdictions on the first page of the OR&R — names that had appeared in the June 15 Supplemental Packet. As we will see, this information would later be contained in a last-minute Supplemental Packet, submitted to the Board on the afternoon before the August 17 Board meeting.)

9. An accompanying memorandum to the Board, included in the August 17 Meeting Packet, reminded Board members about the two-step process for amending the OR&R, and highlighted the same four items proposed for amendment that had been highlighted in June. See https://www.mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/MCE-Board-Meeting-PacketAugust-2023.pdf, at pdf pp. 14–15. To keep these items in mind, we quote this memorandum:
“For reference, the revisions to the ORR that the Board authorized to proceed for approval include:
• Updating MCE’s name from ‘Marin Energy Authority’;
• Streamlining the Chairperson’s duty from ‘supervise the preparation of the agenda’ to ‘review the agenda’ before each Board or Committee meeting; • Allowing the continuation of the Secretary’s one-year term, subject to the Board’s decision to remove; [and]
• Changing the annual election Board meeting month from June to ‘on or near December’ which better aligns with the local elections of the MCE member communities.” Id., at pdf p. 15.

Again, neither the OR&R version recommended to be approved in the Meeting Packet, nor its accompanying memorandum, mentioned any change in the Board’s authority to approve the 227
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 47 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes hiring of General Counsel. (And again, these omissions would soon be “corrected” by Supplemental Packet and verbal introduction by counsel.)

10. Prior to the August 17 Board meeting, a Supplemental Packet was again posted, again late, and other relevant documents were submitted to Board members by email without public posting (see paragraph #11 below). See https://www.mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/08/MCE-Board-Meeting-Supplement-Packet-August-2023.pdf. However, this packet is unlike most of the Board packets we have seen on the MCE website, before and after 2023. The Supplemental Packet for the August 17 meeting, as this packet appeared to the Grand Jury in 2026 (and earlier, on Sept. 19, 2024 and Oct. 6, 2024, courtesy of the Internet Archive Wayback Machine), consists simply of a two-page agenda, without any attached documents. https://web.archive.org/web/20241001000000/https://www.mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/08/MCE-Board-Meeting-Supplement-Packet-August-2023.pdf. More specifically, this Supplemental Packet included no document showing proposed amendments to the OR&R, and no memorandum highlighting or explaining changes to Board approval of the hiring of General Counsel. Absent a second presentation of proposed changes to the OR&R highlighting such removal of the Board’s authority, under both (1) the Brown Act (California’s open public meetings law, set out in Cal. Gov. Code, §§ 54950–54963), and (2) pursuant to the two-step process required for OR&R amendments, it appears to the Grand Jury that the Board could not properly undertake a second, confirming, vote on such changes.

Late and Missing Documents — and Misdirection

11. We have learned, from our interviews with Board members, that although documentation showing proposed amendments to the OR&R to remove the Board’s authority is missing from MCE’s official posted archives, in fact Board members were provided such written documentation on the day before the August 17, 2023 Board meeting. An MCE staff email sent at 2:56 PM on August 16, 2023, to all Board members stated: “Attached are real-time and meeting materials to be discussed at tomorrow’s in-person Board meeting at 7:00 P.M.” Appended to that email were: (1) The same two-page Supplemental Packet agenda mentioned in paragraph #10, above; (2) a 10-page slide presentation about MCE’s Deep Green program; and (3) & (4) “redlined” and “clean” versions of the proposed changes to the OR&R. The latter two documents showed, in renumbered article VI, section 2.b., the proposed amendment removing the Board’s authority to approve the hiring of General Counsel, just as this amendment appeared in the June Supplemental Packet mentioned in paragraphs #5 and #6 above. Significantly, there was no accompanying memorandum, or update to the prior memorandum described in paragraph #9 above, highlighting the inclusion of this additional amendment, or otherwise reminding the Board of the (less-than-transparent) explanation that had been provided orally at the June Board meeting. Nor have we seen any indication that MCE’s General Counsel, or associate general counsel, alerted the Board to any potential conflict of interest arising from counsel’s representations or presentations concerning this matter that directly affected General Counsel.

12. The Board voted again at the August 17, 2023 meeting to amend the OR&R. See https://mcecleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/MCE-Board-Meeting-Minutes-August228 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 48 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes 17-2023.pdf, pdf p. 3, item 7. As the ensuing Board meeting video shows, MCE’s associate legal counsel highlighted the “version that … you received yesterday via email,” and stated that it was “the [same] one that has been distributed today.”
https://www.youtube.com/embed/4Vk9j021OZw, at 1:18:57–1:19:09. Then legal counsel reported that MCE staff recommended the Board’s approval of the proposed amendments. In doing so legal counsel did not mention, let alone highlight, the fact that the new document in the Supplemental Packet (both redlined and clean versions) differed from the OR&R amendment document contained in the initial August 17 meeting packet, insofar as the new document removed the Board’s authority to approve the hiring of General Counsel.

Unusually for Board meetings, there was no discussion by Board members about any of the four proposed amendments to the OR&R submitted to the Board, whether in June or in August, and counsel did not state that the new document was the same document approved by the Board in June (two approvals being consistent with the OR&R’s two-step amendment process). Nor did the Board Chair ask if any member of the public wished to comment. The matter was moved quickly to a vote; the proposed OR&R amendment passed unanimously. Id. at 1:20:26–1:22:30.

Result: Board Authority is Reduced — and the Hiring Without Board Approval is Papered Over

13. The resulting updated version of the OR&R presently posted on the MCE website (listed as amended as of August 17, 2023) shows that the Board retains its authority to approve the hiring of the CEO — but the Board’s former authority, possessed since 2009, to approve the hiring of General Counsel, is now absent. See https://mcecleanenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/08/Amended-MCE-Operating-Rules-Regulatons-Final-8.21.23.pdf, at pdf p. 4.

Observations and Conclusions — Skirting the Rules, the Board Unaware, and Apparent Violation of The Brown Act

1. In light of paragraph #s 1–3 above, we question how Catalina Murphy was promoted to the position of General Counsel in April 2023, without Board approval of that hiring, when it appears that, at that time, MCE’s fundamental governing OR&R document controlled, and required, approval of the “full … Board.”

2. In light of paragraph #s 4–10 above, it appears that the OR&R amendment removing the Board’s authority to approve hiring of General Counsel, submitted to the Board on June 15 in the late Supplemental Packet, was never properly brought to the attention of the Board, either by memorandum or orally, before the Board voted to adopt such a change. To the contrary: As observed earlier, it appears that the explanation then given to the Board concerning the proposed amendment did more to obfuscate than illuminate. The “quick summary of the proposed revisions” did not mention the fact that the Board was being asked to eliminate from its fundamental OR&R, the key authority that it had possessed since 2009 — the approval of the hiring of General Counsel.
229
Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 49 of 49
MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes

3. The Brown Act, California’s open public meetings law, requires that materials distributed less than 72 hours prior to discussion of agenda items must be made available for “public inspection … at the time the writing is distributed” to the Board members. (Cal. Gov. Code, § 54957.5, subd. (b)(1).) This section provides two alternative ways for an agency to comply with this requirement:
● First, under subdivision (b)(2)(A), the agency shall (i) make the writing available for public inspection “at a public office or location that the agency shall designate for this purpose” and (ii) list the address where [the writing] is available “on the agendas for all meetings of the legislative body of that agency.”
● Alternatively, an agency can comply under subdivision (b)(2)(B), by meeting each of four different requirements, one of which is: “(ii) The … agency immediately posts [the writing] on the … agency’s internet website.” For those attending the August 17, 2023 meeting remotely, immediate posting on MCE’s website pursuant to section 54957.5, subdivision (b)(2)(B) — along with a real-time oral notification to the video audience highlighting the posting prior to the Board’s vote — would be the only way for MCE to provide public access to such a last-minute submission.

In light of paragraph #s 8–13 above, it is unclear whether MCE and its Board complied with this important law. Specifically, based on what is shown in MCE’s public archives, it is not apparent that the key documents setting out the proposed changes to the OR&R, which were appended to the email sent to Board members on August 16, and then subsequently distributed to Board members at the August 17 meeting, were made available to the public (whether attending the meeting in person or participating virtually on line) prior to the Board’s vote. (Indeed, these key documents remain hidden from the public on MCE’s public archives page even now.)

4. Finally, the history set out above concerning the June and August meetings reflects strikingly similar internal procedural irregularities that, on their own (and all the more when considered in combination), make us question whether the Board (i) received clear and independent legal advice about an issue that directly affected General Counsel, and (ii) was fully aware of the significant change that it approved on August 17, 2023, which removed its own authority to approve hiring of General Counsel. Specifically, as mentioned in the above timeline:
● In June 2023 MCE’s legal counsel highlighted, both by memorandum and orally, various specific proposed amendments to the OR&R — but was insufficiently transparent (and indeed, appears to have obfuscated) regarding amendments written to remove the Board’s authority to approve hiring of General Counsel. ● In August 2023, counsel obfuscated again, at least twice. As an initial matter, MCE’s legal counsel listed specific proposed amendments to the OR&R, but that list did not include removing the Board’s authority to approve the hiring of General Counsel. Next, after providing the Board with a late substitute document that did show the removal of the Board’s authority, MCE’s legal counsel provided an ambiguous and incomplete history of that change and, once again, counsel failed to highlight that change (either by an accompanying memorandum, or orally) when presenting the OR&R amendment to the Board.
###
230

RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY REPORT

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REPORT TITLE: “MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes”
REPORT DATE: June 16, 2026
RESPONSE BY: Town of San Anselmo

FINDINGS
▪ I (we) agree with the findings numbered: F4, F5
▪ I (we) disagree partially with the findings numbered: None ▪ I (we) disagree wholly with the findings numbered: None (Attach a statement specifying any portions of the findings that are disputed; include an explanation of the reasons therefor.)

GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS
 I (we) agree with the recommendations numbered: R5
 I (we) disagree partially with the recommendations numbered: R6  I (we) disagree wholly with the recommendations numbered: None Date: _____________________ Signed: __________________________ Steve Burdo, Mayor
Town of San Anselmo
Number of pages attached: 3
231
County of Marin Response to Grand Jury Report Findings and Recommendations “MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes” (July 16, 2026)
__________________________________________________________________________

RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY FINDINGS
F4. Many Board members have — quite understandably — limited expertise regarding a large and complex company such as MCE.

Response: Agree
The Town agrees that many Board members understandably have limited specialized expertise regarding MCE’s operations. The Town also believes MCE should provide robust onboarding, recurring training, clear decision materials, and access to independent technical and legal advice so that all Board members can exercise informed oversight.

F5. All MCE Board members are local elected officials who face competing demands on their limited time and resources; as a result, meeting attendance has often been poor, and insufficient for optimally effective governance.

Response: Agree
The Town agrees that reliable attendance by either the appointed representative or designated alternate is important to effective governance. San Anselmo has maintained consistent representation and will continue to use its designated alternate when the primary representative is unavailable.

RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS
The Marin County Civil Grand Jury recommends the following:

R5. By December 31, 2026, all of MCE’s Marin jurisdictions, and preferably all 38 jurisdictions covered by MCE, should implement a process by which its appointed Board member, or, in that person’s absence, the designated alternate member, commits to attending each regular Board meeting.

This recommendation has been implemented.

The Town appoints both a primary MCE Board representative and a designated alternate and expects one of them to attend each regular Board meeting. When the primary representative is unavailable, the alternate is contacted to attend. The Town will continue to consider attendance and availability when making its annual appointments to regional bodies and will periodically review its representation to support consistent participation and continuity. The Town also supports MCE’s consistent administration of its attendance requirements and timely communication with member jurisdictions when attendance concerns arise.

R6. By December 31, 2026, all of MCE’s Marin jurisdictions, and preferably all 38 jurisdictions covered by MCE, should reassess their appointments of chosen Board members to prioritize those with the most extensive financial and energy expertise.
232
County of Marin Response to Grand Jury Report Findings and Recommendations “MCE, Marin Clean Energy: A Series of Missteps Highlight Need for Governance Changes” (July 16, 2026)
__________________________________________________________________________ Financial and energy expertise are not anticipated to be the controlling criterion for every appointment. The Town agrees that a combination of relevant financial and energy governance experience, institutional knowledge, state compliance, continuity of service, and the ability to represent the community effectively should be considered when appointing an MCE Board representative from the Town. Accordingly, San Anselmo will continue to appoint the councilmember best positioned to provide consistent and meaningful oversight, considering specialized expertise as one important factor among several. The Town also encourages MCE to strengthen Board training and access to independent expertise and to evaluate, through its governance assessment, whether the Board’s size and composition provide the expertise and continuity appropriate for an agency of MCE’s size and complexity.
233
Item 2.4

STAFF REPORT
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO Item 2.4
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2026
AGENDA TITLE: Memorial Park – Athletic Courts Improvement Project:
60% Design
FROM: Mattie O’Grady, Director of Community Services
Scott Schneider, Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION: That the Town Council review the Memorial Park Athletic Courts Improvement project’s conceptual design and provide direction to staff.

BACKGROUND
Memorial Park is the Town’s largest and most heavily used park and serves as a central gathering place for organized sports, informal recreation, and community events. In 2018, the Town Council approved the Memorial Park Master Plan, which established a long-term vision to address aging infrastructure, improve drainage, modernize recreational facilities, and enhance park amenities. Since its adoption, the Town has implemented the Master Plan in phases as funding has become available, including renovations to fields, parking areas, playgrounds, and picnic facilities.

In 2024, staff initiated an amendment to the Memorial Park Master Plan focused on improvements to the southern portion of the park. Potential improvements included the reconfiguration or replacement of the tennis courts, parking and drop-off areas, snack shack, basketball court, skate park, restrooms, and picnic facilities. The amendment process included public outreach through community meetings and surveys to gather feedback regarding preferred improvements and community priorities.

Recognizing that full implementation of the Master Plan and proposed amendments would require a combination of public and private funding, the Town engaged Lotus Consulting in 2025 to conduct a Capital Campaign Feasibility Assessment and Plan for Memorial Park. The assessment evaluated the feasibility of a $4 million philanthropic campaign to help close the funding gap for the final phase of the Master Plan, in addition to approximately $5 million in existing and committed public funding.

The feasibility assessment was performed by conducting 21 confidential interviews with residents, business and civic leaders, and individuals with major-gift capacity. While the study found strong community support for Memorial Park and its proposed 234
Item 2.4
improvements, it also identified significant constraints that would limit the Town’s ability to successfully pursue a $4 million capital campaign at this time.

Based on these findings, staff recommended narrowing the scope of the Master Plan amendment to focus on renovation of the Memorial Park Athletic Courts. In February 2026, the Town re-engaged Integra Planning + Landscape Architecture to begin design work for redevelopment of the athletic courts.

On August 18, 2026, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Memorial Park court improvement project. Written, in-person, and online public comments were overwhelmingly supportive of the project, including the proposed permanent futsal court and improvements to the tennis and pickleball courts.

Commenters described the temporary summer futsal installation as a well-used community amenity that supported informal play, physical activity, youth engagement, and social interaction among residents of varying ages. Speakers noted frequent use by children and families following summer camp, participation in pickup play and tournament activities, and the opportunity for youth to gather and recreate outside of organized sports programs.

Several commenters supported construction of a permanent futsal court and improved tennis and pickleball facilities. Comments included support for a cushioned turf surface to improve player comfort and safety, dedicated and clearly marked pickleball courts, and improvements to the condition of the existing court surfaces. One commenter also requested that the Town consider pedestrian access and a safer crossing connection between the Red Hill Shopping Center and the Sunny Hills park entrance. Commenters encouraged completion of the project before the summer season, when youth camp participants and other park users could benefit most from the facility.

A community member also expressed interest in assisting with fundraising for the futsal component, noting potential support within the local soccer community.

In response to Commission questions regarding the proposed turf material and temperature, staff clarified that the project would not replace any existing natural grass areas at Memorial Park. The proposed synthetic-turf futsal court would be installed on an existing hard-surface court area, while the park’s grass areas would remain available for public use.

Staff further noted that contemporary synthetic-turf systems offer alternatives to traditional recycled-tire crumb-rubber infill. Potential material options may include organic or mineral-based infills, such as olive-pit, cork, or coconut-husk material combined with silica sand, as well as shock-pad systems that may reduce or eliminate the need for infill for a small court installation.

The final turf specification has not been determined. During design development, the Town would evaluate turf pile height, shock-pad requirements, drainage performance, 235
Item 2.4
infill needs, maintenance requirements, player safety, lifecycle considerations, and environmental factors.

The Commission also inquired about the potential for program-generated revenue to offset ongoing maintenance costs. Staff noted that programming and cost-recovery opportunities would be considered during a later phase of project implementation; however, ongoing maintenance funding would be necessary.

Following discussion, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended that the Town Council advance the project substantially as presented, without major modifications.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The base concept of this design incorporates all the community feedback received during the 2024 Master Plan amendment process and retains the general approach of renovating the courts in their existing location. The 2024 approved Master Plan amendment included one multi-sport court for futsal and basketball, two dedicated tennis courts, and two dedicated pickleball courts. The updated 2026 design maintains the existing fencing framework and includes one dedicated futsal court, two dedicated tennis courts, and three dedicated pickleball courts.

Staff recommend changing the previously proposed multi-sport court to a dedicated synthetic-turf futsal court. A half-court basketball area with three hoops currently exists at Memorial Park and will remain available for basketball use. The recommended futsalcourt design offers several advantages:
• From June 12 through July 19, community members raised funds and improved two tennis courts to support the San Anselmo World Cup Street Soccer program.

The program was highly successful and generated strong community interest in continuing and expanding soccer programming at Memorial Park. • Synthetic turf is expected to reduce sound impacts on adjacent residential properties when compared with a hard-surface multi-sport court. • Modular multi-sport court tiles become slippery when moisture is present, which may limit safe use during certain weather conditions.
• A synthetic-turf futsal court would provide a flexible, year-round venue for youth and adult recreation programming, including soccer, lacrosse, specialty camps, agility training, tai chi, and other activities.
• Only two other rentable turf futsal courts are currently available in Marin County.

The proposed court would be prioritized for Town recreation programming and community use.

To manage budget risk while maximizing opportunities for additional improvements, the project is structured with a base bid for the core athletic-court improvements and one bid alternate for improvements to the Sunny Hills entrance area. The bid alternate would address frontage-area improvements and accessibility issues associated with that entrance, including related infrastructure and beautification work. This approach allows 236
Item 2.4
the Town to prioritize essential athletic-court improvements while retaining the option to include the Sunny Hills entrance work if construction pricing is favorable 2024 Design
2026 Design
237
Item 2.4

FISCAL IMPACT
The Town has allocated $871,000 for this project, including funding from Measure A, Measure J, and the Park Improvement Fund. Additionally, the Town has received a $15,000 donation.

The current cost estimate for the athletic-court improvements is $1,017,528, and the cost estimate for the frontage/entrance improvements is $706,260. Both estimates account for a 20% contingency.

The frontage and entrance improvements are included as a bid alternate. Award of the bid alternate will depend on the construction bids received, the availability of project funds after award of the base scope, and any additional fundraising secured by the Town.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The proposed athletic court redevelopment is consistent with General Plan because it upgrades deficient recreational infrastructure, improves safety and user experience, and enhances accessibility. The project further implements direction to continue phased implementation of the adopted Memorial Park Master Plan.

CEQA AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Town finds this Project to be categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare environmental documents under the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1, as it involves the maintenance and minor alteration of an existing facility with negligible or no expansion of use.

The project is consistent with Climate Action Plan S-1.a (Urban Forests, planting additional trees) and A-4.a and b (Natural Infrastructure, trees and bioretention).

Attachment 1 – Conceptual Design
Attachment 2 – Presentation
Attachment 3 – Public Comments Received for Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting 8.18.26
238

NO PARKING

PREFERRED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO
1000 SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BOULEVARD, SAN ANSELMO, CALIFORNIA

MEMORIAL PARK RENOVATION
O F
DATE:

SHEET
NUMBER :

PROJECT
NUMBER:
07/07/2026
1 26-002.01

MATERIAL SCHEDULE
1 SYNTHETIC SPORTS TURF w/ STRIPING
ASPHALT CONCRETE COURTS w/ STRIPING
ASPHALT CONCRETE PARKING PAVING w/ STRIPING

BIORETENTION AREA
CONCRETE ADA PARKING PAVING w/ STRIPING

CONCRETE PAVING
(N) 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE
(N) 12' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE
EXISTING 12' HIGH FENCE
(N) 8' HIGH MAN GATE
(N) 6' HIGH MAINTENANCE GATE
EXISTING 8' HIGH MAN GATE
EXISTING 12' HIGH DOUBLE GATE
2 3

AMENITIES SCHEDULE
A 18" WIDE SEAT WALL
6" CONCRETE CURB
CONCRETE STEPS w/ HANDRAIL

BLEACHERS

TENNIS NETS

PICKLEBALL NET

FUTSAL GOAL

DRINKING FOUNTAIN

ADA PARKING SIGN

ENTRY/MONUMENT SIGN

DRINKING FOUNTAIN

TRASH RECEPTACLES
B
C
D
1 inch = ft
( IN FEET )

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
10 PICKLEBALL
COURTS

FUTSAL COURT
(E) BASEBALL FIELD
(N) SHADE
TREE, TYP.
(E) CHAINLINK

FENCE AND GATES
TO REMAIN, TYP.
(E) APARTMENT BUILDINGS
TENNIS
COURT
TENNIS
COURT
(E) TANK
(E) SKATE
RAMP
(E) SKATE
RAMP
(E) ASPHALT
(E) STAIRS
(E) CONC. WALK
1 PA
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 PA
PA
PA
PA
(E) DUGOUT
3 5
6 4
E
F F
G G
I
E
D
F
J
G
H
A
B
H

I SUNNY HILLS DRIVE

J (E) ASPHALT
(E) TURF
(E) TURF
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 6
6 6
6 6
A
PA
PA
PA
A
A
A
3 K
K
L 5
6 (E) ASPHALT
(E) STORAGE
4 4
4 L
PA
(N) ADA COMPANION
SEATING, TYP.
(E) POST LIGHT
TO REMAIN.
(E) POST LIGHT
TO REMAIN.
(E) POST LIGHT
TO REMAIN.
(E) BLOCK

WALL TO
REMAIN.
(N) 12' HIGH
FENCE, TYP.
(N) 6' HIGH
FENCE, TYP.
(E) UTILITIES
TO REMAIN.
(E) BIKE RACKS
TO REMAIN. (E) CROSSWALK
TO BE
RESTRIPED.
(N) CONCRETE
CURB, TYP.

C
PA
8/13/2026
L-1
239
Memorial Park
Athletic Courts Improvement Project
60% Conceptual Design Review
Town Council
August 15, 2026
FUTSAL
TENNIS

PICKLEBALL

ACCESSIBILITY
240
Project Background
Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 3 2018 Town Council adopted the Memorial Park Master Plan. 2024 Master Plan amendment process considered improvements to the park’s southern area and gathered community input.
2025 Capital Campaign Feasibility Assessment evaluated a $4 million philanthropic campaign; strong support was identified, but constraints limited campaign feasibility at this time.
2026 Town narrowed the effort to athletic-court renovation and re-engaged Integra Planning + Landscape Architecture.

Review the Memorial Park Athletic Courts Improvement Project’s conceptual design and provide direction to staff
Town Council Action
241
2024 Approved Amendment – Conceptual Design
242
2024 and 2026 Design Direction
Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 5 2024 Approved Amendment 2026 Updated Design
• One multi-sport court for futsal
and basketball
• Two dedicated tennis courts
• Two dedicated pickleball courts
• Updated skatepark
• New Restrooms
• New Concessions
• Seating, shade, plantings
• Scaled back scope to only include
Athletic Courts & frontage/entrance
improvements
• One dedicated synthetic-turf futsal
court
• Two dedicated tennis courts
• Three dedicated pickleball courts
• Existing half-court basketball
remains
The updated concept responds to community feedback and recent court activation, while prioritizing durable and dedicated athletic uses.
243
2026 Updated Conceptual Design
244
2026 Entrance Sketch
245
Why a Dedicated Turf Futsal Court?
Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 6 • Builds on strong community interest
generated by the San Anselmo World Cup
Street Soccer program
• Expected to reduce sound impacts on
adjacent residences compared with a
hard-surface multi-sport court
• Avoids potential slipperiness of modular
court tiles when moisture is present
• Creates a flexible, year-round venue for
youth and adult soccer, lacrosse, camps,
agility training, tai chi, and other activities
• Would be prioritized for Town recreation
programming and community use
• Half court basketball court remains
246
Why Now?
Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 7

COMMUNITY ACCESSIBILITY ACTIVATION
247
Proof of Concept
Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 7 248 Base Bid + Sunny Hills Entrance/Frontage Alternate
Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 7 Base Bid
• Core athletic-court
improvements
• Prioritizes essential renovation
needs
• Protects delivery of the central
project scope
• Financially Manageable
Add Alternate
• Sunny Hills entrance/frontage
improvements
• Addresses accessibility issues,
related infrastructure, and
beautification
• Award depends on bid pricing,
remaining funds, and additional
fundraising
This structure manages budget risk while preserving the opportunity to advance entrance accessibility if funding permits.
249
Visual of Base + Add Alternate
250
Funding and Fiscal Considerations
Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 8 $871,000
Allocated project funding
Measure A • Measure J • Park
Improvement Fund
$15,000
Donation received
Construction
Estimates
$1,017,528
Court Improvements - base scope
$706,260
Frontage/entrance improvements
- add alternate
The frontage and entrance improvements are included as a bid alternate. Award will depend on construction bids received, available project funds after award of the base scope, and any additional fundraising secured by the Town.

Both estimates include a 20% contingency.
251
Creative Options to Assist with Funding
Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 7 • Fundraising through Friends of San Anselmo Parks
• Scaling back and removing some design elements
• Consider Recreation Department reserves
252
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting – August 18, 2026 Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 6

STRONG COMMUNITY SUPPORT
• Commentors supported a permanent
futsal court, designated pickleball courts
and improvements to the tennis courts.
• Commenters described the temporary
summer futsal courts as a successful and
well-used community amenity.
• Speakers highlighted the project’s
potential to expand recreation
opportunities for youth, families, adult
players, and informal users.
• Several residents expressed appreciation
for the project’s ability to bring people
together through unstructured, drop-in
recreation.
253
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting – August 18, 2026 Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 6

ADDITIONAL PUBLIC INPUT
• A commenter requested evaluation of
pedestrian access and a safer crossing
connection between Red Hill Shopping
Center and the Sunny Hills park entrance
• A community member expressed interest
in helping pursue fundraising for the futsal
component
• Commenters appreciated the designated
tennis and pickleball courts
254
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting – August 18, 2026 Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 6

COMMISSION DISCUSSION
• The Town will need evaluate alternatives
to traditional recycled-tire crumb-rubber
infill, including organic infills such as
olive pit, cork, or coconut husk; mineralbased infill such as silica sand; and shock-pad systems that may reduce or
eliminate the need for infill.
• Consider potential for programgenerated revenue to offset ongoing maintenance costs
255
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting – August 18, 2026 Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 6

RECOMMENDED DIRECTION
• Advance the Memorial Park court
improvement project as presented.
• Continue design development to refine
turf materials, drainage, safety,
environmental, and maintenance
considerations.
• Evaluate pedestrian access,
programming, fundraising, and
operational strategies during
subsequent project phases.
256
Quick Thanks
Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 7 Community
Parks and Rec Commission
Town Council
257
Next Steps
Town of San Anselmo | Memorial Park Athletic Courts Renovation | August 25, 2026 10 1 Town Council review
conceptual design
and provide
direction to staff
August 25, 2026
›
2 Advance final
design, cost
estimate, and bid
documents
Fall/Winter 2026
›
3 Solicit construction
bids; evaluate base
bid and alternate
Spring 2027
›
4 Proceed with
construction based
on funding and
award authorization
Summer 2027
Questions?
258
Outlook
soccer courts
From Julio Garcia <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/17/2026 2:13 PM
To Recreation <[email protected]>
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: External Sender
our kids need more places like this to take better decisions on their life’s Please help to get soccer and sports in general places for kids and adults to enjoy there’s a big community in san anselmo/san rafael who is always looking for an empty spot to play soccer instead of watching tv or taking bad decisions please help.

Julio Garcia
415 5324899
259
Outlook
Support for Futsal Court at Memorial Park
From Teva Blair <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/17/2026 8:54 AM
To Recreation <[email protected]>
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: External Sender
Dear Parks & Recreation Commission,
We are writing in support of the proposal to build a permanent futsal court at Memorial Park. Our three boys had such a great time this summer playing pick-up games at the courts. What a wonderful way for our community to come together and support kids and adults in staying active. I also think it gives our youth another safe place to gather with their friends.

Thank you for considering the proposal.

Best,
The Blairs
(Fairfax residents)
260
Outlook
please consider building a permanent futsal court
From Teymy Bahmani <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/17/2026 12:20 PM
To Recreation <[email protected]>
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: External Sender
I live in San Anselmo, coached SA rec teams, and wholeheartedly support the Town building a permanent futsal court.

The demand and interest in soccer has grown exponentially - it’s hard to find field space but more importantly a dedicated futsal court would foster more community pickup play - and the location would permit better use.

Many communities have seen what SA has seen - these smaller sports courts are wildly popular - and could be a showcase for the rest of Marin to build smaller spaces to play soccer.

Thank you,
Teymy Bahmani
261
Outlook
Support for Permanent Futsal Court at Memorial Park
From Yair Levin <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/17/2026 8:15 AM
To Recreation <[email protected]>
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: External Sender
Dear San Anselmo Recreation Department,
I am writing to express my strong support for the permanent futsal court at Memorial Park. The incredible community spirit on display during the World Cup was truly inspiring, and I look forward to seeing that energy fostered in our neighborhood.

As someone who's been playing tennis at the Memorial Courts for the past decade, I am especially happy to see the bottom courts being revitalized. Those courts have been cracked, unusable, and unplayable for years, and repurposing them for futsal is a wonderful way to bring life back to that space.

Unfortunately, I am unable to attend the meeting this Tuesday, but I request that my support for this project be clearly shared with the committee.

Thank you for your time and dedication to improving our community spaces.

Best regards,
Yair Levin
Santa Barbara Avenue, San Anselmo
262
Outlook
Permanent Futsal court - YES please!!
From Nilanka Maldeniya <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/17/2026 4:58 PM
To Recreation <[email protected]>; Recreation <[email protected]> You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: External Sender
Dear San Anselmo Recreation Department,
I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for the proposal to build a permanent futsal court and pickleball courts at Memorial Park.

Over the summer, my teenage kids used the World Cup futsal court daily. It provided them with a fantastic space to stay active, stay fit, and socialize with friends and new community members in a healthy, positive environment. Having this space kept them engaged outdoors and away from screens and computers, rather than aimlessly wandering around Red Hill with nothing to do.

The court truly brought neighbors of all ages together and added something special to San Anselmo, much like Live on the Avenue does. We strongly support making this court permanent and keeping it open for kids to drop in and play pickup games with whoever shows up.

To ensure a safe and positive experience for everyone, it might make sense to consider structured or designated time slots based on age groups—for example, earlier hours reserved for younger children and later times (around 7:00 PM onwards) set aside for teenagers aged 13 and up.

Thank you to the Recreation Department for spearheading this wonderful project. It is an extraordinary way to support the youth of our community, foster connections, and keep the community spirit alive.

Best regards,
Nilli
8/18/26, 9:15 AM Inbox - Vincent Lin - Outlook
https://outlook.office.com/mail/none/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AiNza0oXEGEKuvdeYhNph%2FgAG5S9FKwAA?nativeV… 1/1 263
Outlook
Making Futsal Available in San Anselmo!
From Jim Farley <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/17/2026 5:07 PM
To Recreation <[email protected]>
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: External Sender
Hello San Anselmo Town Council and Parks/Rec Commissioners! Our son played in the recent futsal tournament held at the courts at Memorial Park - it was a blast, a vibrant and fun community sports gathering.

Having seen our son play soccer now through local rec leagues, indoor futsal, club and high school(including years with San Anselmo Rec), there is a significant men and women’s’ soccer community of all ages in the Ross Valley and throughout Marin County. For younger players, futsal is a great way to build skills and confidence.

Whether it be tournaments, leagues or drop-in play, I believe new courts at Memorial Park will be wellutilized and appreciated by many players - and their parent and friend spectators.

Gabe Turner and his team produced a wonderful tournament this past summer - more of these will prove to be popular.

Needless to say, a major beneficiary of more ongoing activity at the park are the neighboring restaurants at the Red Hill Shopping Center for post game/practice meals and treats.

So count our family in as enthusiastic supporters of planning underway to bring futsal to Memorial! We are longtime residents of San Anselmo and would enjoy seeing such a new sports and recreation offering in town!
Jim Farley
[email protected]
Sent from my iPhone
8/18/26, 9:17 AM Inbox - Vincent Lin - Outlook
https://outlook.office.com/mail/none/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AiNza0oXEGEKuvdeYhNph%2FgAG5S9NDgAA?nativeV… 1/1 264
Outlook
In support of Futsol & Pickleball courts
From Stian <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/17/2026 8:07 PM
To Recreation <[email protected]>
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: External Sender
Hello San Anselmo!
I just wanted to write a quick note in support of creating futsal and pickleball courts at Memorial Park.

Both are super fun and popular sports that I think our town would benefit from having a dedicated space for.

Stian
--
Stian Rasmussen
415-844-0984
8/18/26, 9:17 AM Inbox - Vincent Lin - Outlook
https://outlook.office.com/mail/none/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AiNza0oXEGEKuvdeYhNph%2FgAG5S9avgAA?nativeVe… 1/1 265
Outlook
Futsal field at memorial park
From Jason Coleman <[email protected]>
Date Tue 8/18/2026 9:01 AM
To Recreation <[email protected]>
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: External Sender
Let us keep the futsal field. Great place to gather and grow your community 8/18/26, 9:18 AM Inbox - Vincent Lin - Outlook
https://outlook.office.com/mail/none/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AiNza0oXEGEKuvdeYhNph%2FgAG5qlzCQAA?nativeVe… 1/1 266
Outlook
Making Futsal Available in San Anselmo Year Round!
From Jim Farley <[email protected]>
Date Tue 8/25/2026 12:00 PM
To Town Council <[email protected]>
[Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: External Sender
>
> Hello San Anselmo Town Council!
>
> Our son played in the summer futsal tournament held at the courts at Memorial Park - it was a blast, a vibrant and fun community sports gathering. >
> Having seen our son play soccer now through local rec leagues, indoor futsal, club and high school(including years with San Anselmo Rec), there is a significant men and women’s’ soccer community of all ages in the Ross Valley and throughout Marin County. For younger players, futsal is a great way to build skills and confidence.
>
> Whether it be tournaments, leagues or drop-in play, I believe new courts at Memorial Park will be well- utilized and appreciated by many players - and their parent and friend spectators.
>
> Gabe Turner and his team produced a wonderful tournament this past summer - more of these will prove to be popular. A great way to build community and connect kids (and adults) with such an inclusive sports. A ball, a surface, goals and players - you have a game. >
> Needless to say, a major beneficiary of more ongoing activity at Memorial Park are the neighboring restaurants at the Red Hill Shopping Center for post game/practice meals and treats.
>
> Count our family in as enthusiastic supporters of planning underway to bring futsal to Memorial! We are longtime residents of San Anselmo and would enjoy seeing such a new sports and recreation offering in town! Thank you for considering the plans before your Council.

Best regards,
>
> Jim Farley
> [email protected]
>
> Sent from my iPhone
267
Outlook
Endorsement to make futsal permanent at Memorial Park
From Jon Gumucio <[email protected]>
Date Tue 8/25/2026 9:01 AM
To Town Council <[email protected]>
[Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: External Sender
Hello,
My name is Jon, and I live in San Anselmo near the Seminary. I'm writing to ask the council to consider making futsal a permanent fixture at Memorial Park.

I've played soccer my whole life and have spent the past four years as Vice President of San Francisco Celtic Soccer Club (nine years on the team overall). In that time, I've watched small-sided pickup games turn into lasting community. People who show up for games end up organizing rides, grabbing food and drinks together afterward, and building friendships that outlast any single season. It also has a real impact on local businesses. Our team received several sponsorships from businesses in the area, which serves as direct evidence of the kind of impact these games generate.

Futsal is especially well-suited to that kind of grassroots growth. It's low-cost to play since a ball and a generally flat surface is all you need, which makes it one of the more accessible sports for a neighborhood to build around. A dedicated court tends to bring even more foot traffic to nearby businesses, especially if games run on a regular schedule. I’d imagine that Swirl, Pizzalina, the Hub, and the rest of the businesses nearby would favor the extra clientele.

I'm unable to attend tonight's meeting, but I'd welcome the chance to attend a future meeting where this is discussed. Thank you for considering it.

Best,
Jon
268
Outlook
Futsal court in san anselmo
From Dan Kasin <[email protected]>
Date Tue 8/25/2026 7:26 AM
To Town Council <[email protected]>
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: External Sender
To whom it may concern:

I am writing In support of the proposed Futsal court in Memorial Park. It’s a great way for our kids to train and also have fun. We love futsal.

Best,
Dan
160 Legend Road
san anselmo ca 94960
C: 415 710 2534
269
Outlook
Written Support of Permanent Futsal Court
From Dan Miller <[email protected]>
Date Tue 8/25/2026 12:29 PM
To Town Council <[email protected]>
Cc Gabe Turner <[email protected]>
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: External Sender
Hello Town Council,
I'm writing to urge the Council to fund a permanent futsal court at Memorial Park.

Soccer is the world's game, and being able to play and celebrate it locally is an important step in growing the sport here in the US. This past summer, the temporary futsal setup at Memorial Park brought people together in a way I haven't seen elsewhere in town — kids, teenagers, and adults all sharing the same space, with a steady rotation of games throughout. Futsal's smaller scale makes it a version of the beautiful game that's genuinely accessible to everyone, from young kids to those of us well into our 40s and beyond.

A permanent court would turn a great one-off into a lasting community asset. I'm unable to attend tonight's meeting, but wanted this on record as written support ahead of it.

Thank you for your time and consideration,
Dan Miller
6 Kilgore Ln
270
Outlook
Futsal in San Anselmo
From Corey Wood <[email protected]>
Date Tue 8/25/2026 9:12 AM
To Town Council <[email protected]>
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: External Sender
Hello San Anselmo Town Council,
I'm writing to express our family's strong support for keeping the futsal courts at Memorial Park and potentially improving them to make them more of a fixture of our community.

I live in San Anselmo with my wife and two daughters (4 and 7). Soccer has always been an integral part of my life, I grew up playing the game, played in college, and now my kids play and share that same passion.

We have seen first hand how valuable the Memorial Park futsal courts are as a gathering space. They provide an accessible, fun, and energetic venue for kids and neighbors of all ages to connect, stay active, and build community around the sport. This court in particular is special because you can just show up and play, then go have pizza or ice cream right across the street, it is a perfect location. Today, there are too many financial barriers for a lot of kids to play a game they love, a futsal court allows all kids and adults the ability to enjoy the game without any financial restrictions.

This style of soccer also is a major contributor to improving foot skills, being forced to work in tighter spaces requires better ball control which pays dividends when you have more space in 11v11 scenarios. In South America, most kids play futsal until they are teenagers, so they don't even play 11v11 until they are 12 or 13.

We really hope the town chooses to preserve and improve these courts so that local families can continue enjoying futsal at Memorial Park for years to come.

Thank you for your time, dedication to our local parks, and all the work you do for our community.

Corey Wood
LinkedIn
925.487.5443
271
Outlook
Fwd: [Help Make Futsal Permanent at Memorial Park ⚽️] - SA Town Council **8pm tonight** From Ming B. Wu <[email protected]>
Date Tue 8/25/2026 8:05 AM
To Town Council <[email protected]>; Gabe Turner <[email protected]> Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: External Sender
Members of the Town Council,
I am currently out of town and have a business engagement during the time of tonight's meeting, but would like to throw my wholehearted support behind the permanent turf futsal court at Memorial Park.  It represents a very SAFE and VALUABLE recreation venue for many of our youth as well as adults.  The sport of soccer is now mainstream here, esp. w the most recent US-Canada-Mexico World Cup.  I think it would reflect a leadership approach by the Town of San Anselmo to make such a physical space available to the community.

Thank you for your consideration,
Ming B. Wu & Family
Ming B. Wu
m: (415)308-6464
e: [email protected]
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Gabe Turner <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 7:14 AM
Subject: [Help Make Futsal Permanent at Memorial Park ⚽️] - SA Town Council **8pm tonight** To:

Thank you to those who attended and submitted notes to the Parks & Recreation Commission last week.

Tonight, we will present our proposal for a permanent, turf futsal court at Memorial Park to the San Anselmo Town Council.

If you can join in person at the Council Chambers (next to the downtown library), that would be fantastic. Otherwise, attending via Zoom or phone is also great. Please consider providing public comment when the item is called.

The meeting starts at 7:00 PM, but the futsal courts are the last item on the agenda and will likely not be discussed until around 8:00 PM.

If you cannot attend but would like to submit written comments, you can email them to [email protected] Meeting Details:
- Zoom Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87104165964
- Phone: +1 669 900 6833
- Webinar ID: 871 0416 5964
Thank you so much for your continued support—it makes all the difference! Gabe
272