Agenda packet — Mayor and City Council, December 7, 2022 (part 3 of 14)

Project: Simple Project Plan
Date: Thu 9/29/22
Packet Pg. 540
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
42 Rough Grade 5 days Mon 1/16/23 Fri 1/20/23 41
43 Montgomery Ward Building 30 days Mon 1/23/23 Fri 3/3/23 17 44 Above Building Demolition 10 days Mon 1/23/23 Fri 2/3/23 45 Below Building Demolition 10 days Mon 2/6/23 Fri 2/17/23 44 46 Haul-Off Construction Debris 5 days Mon 2/20/23 Fri 2/24/23 45 47 Rough Grade 5 days Mon 2/27/23 Fri 3/3/23 46
48 Concrete Crushing 85 days Mon 3/6/23 Fri 6/30/23 43
49 Building 1 (3rd Street) 15 days Mon 3/6/23 Fri 3/24/23 27 50 Above Building Demolition 4 days Mon 3/6/23 Thu 3/9/23 51 Below Building Demolition 8 days Fri 3/10/23 Tue 3/21/23 50 52 Haul-Off Construction Debris 2 days Wed 3/22/23 Thu 3/23/23 51 53 Rough Grade 1 day Fri 3/24/23 Fri 3/24/23 52
54 Building 2 (605 W 4th St) 10 days Mon 3/27/23 Fri 4/7/23 32 55 Above Building Demolition 3 days Mon 3/27/23 Wed 3/29/23 56 Below Building Demolition 3 days Thu 3/30/23 Mon 4/3/23 55 57 Haul-Off Construction Debris 3 days Tue 4/4/23 Thu 4/6/23 56 58 Rough Grade 1 day Fri 4/7/23 Fri 4/7/23 57
59 Main Building 45 days Mon 4/10/23 Fri 6/9/23 54
60 Above building demolition 20 days Mon 4/10/23 Fri 5/5/23 61 Haul-Off Construction Debris 20 days Mon 5/8/23 Fri 6/2/23 60 62 Below Building Demolition 20 days Mon 6/5/23 Fri 6/30/23 61 63 Rough Grade 5 days Mon 7/3/23 Fri 7/7/23 62
64 Partial Demolition at existing Wall to Remain (Harris Bldg) 10 days Mon 6/12/23 Fri 6/23/23 59 65 Surgical Demolition & Wall Preparation 2 days Mon 6/12/23 Tue 6/13/23 66 New Wall Finish Install 2 days Wed 6/14/23 Thu 6/15/23 65 67 New Wall Waterproofing Install 1 day Fri 6/16/23 Fri 6/16/23 66 68 Install Drainage Board 2 days Mon 6/19/23 Tue 6/20/23 67 69 Install Perforated Pipe 2 days Wed 6/21/23 Thu 6/22/23 68 70 Backfill 3/4" Gravel 1 day Fri 6/23/23 Fri 6/23/23 69 71 Partial Demolition at existing Wall to Remain 5 days Mon 6/26/23 Fri 6/30/23 59 72 Surgical Demolution & Wall Preparation 1 day Mon 6/26/23 Mon 6/26/23 73 New Wall Finish to Install 1 day Mon 6/26/23 Mon 6/26/23 74 New Wall Finish to Install 1 day Wed 6/28/23 Wed 6/28/23 73 75 Install Drainage Board 1 day Thu 6/29/23 Thu 6/29/23 74 76 Install Perforated Pipe 1 day Fri 6/30/23 Fri 6/30/23 75 77 Backfill 3/4" Gravel 1 day Fri 6/30/23 Fri 6/30/23
78 Spread, Backfill, Compact Crush and Set Up Drainage 15 days Mon 6/26/23 Fri 7/14/23 63 79 Final Punchlist 2 days Mon 7/17/23 Tue 7/18/23 77
80 Hydroseeding 2 days Wed 7/19/23 Thu 7/20/23 79,78
81 Demobilization 1 day Fri 7/21/23 Fri 7/21/23 80
18 23 28 2 7 12 17 22 27 2 7 12 17 22 27 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 5 10 15 20 25 2 7 12 17 22 27 1 6 11 16 21 26 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Critical
Critical Split
Progress
Manual Progress
Carousel Mall Demoltion Project

Page 2 ends

Project: Simple Project Plan
Date: Thu 9/29/22
Packet Pg. 541
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 26

UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
Schematic Drawings
SSK-01 [folded and stapled attached]
Thumbnail Version
Packet Pg. 542
PROJECT: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: BY: DATE:

Schematic Demolition DesignStructural Demolition Site Plan Carousel Mall Demolition, San Bernardino, CA Resource Environmental/Thornton Tomasetti RFP Response BMS 9/27/2022    
 Packet Pg. 543
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 27 UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT Schematic Drawings
SSK-02 [folded and stapled attached]
Thumbnail Version
Packet Pg. 544
PROJECT: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: BY: DATE:

SSK-02
LEGEND
Demolition Existing Structure(Existing Foundation Plan notavailable) Interface withStructure-to-Remain,See SSK-03
Existing Structure-to-Remain(Existing Foundation Plan notavailable) Fairview Ford Harris
Building
Enterprise
Building
Pedestrian
Walkway
across
North E St.

Structural Repair at Structure-to-Remain,See SSK-03
NORTH
(5
c::

CJ
)>
-I
0 2:
0 r-
:t:,
2:
" - .

I
~>-{
t l1 ) :<i --
Parking
Garage SSK-003

TT TO PROVIDECODE ANALYSISOF EGRESS FORGARAGE WITHBRIDGEDEMOLITION DEMOLITION STRUCTURE, INCLUDINGSLAB-ON-GRADE, GRADE BEAMS ANDPILE CAPS. PILES TO REMAIN.

Potential Equipment Standoff toto Potential Basement Schematic Demolition Design Structural Demolition Site Plan Carousel Mall Demolition, San Bernardino, CA Resource Environmental/Thornton Tomasetti RFP Response BMS 9/27/2022    
 Packet Pg. 545
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 28 UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT Schematic Drawings
SSK-03 [folded and stapled attached]
Thumbnail Version

Packet Pg. 546
PROJECT: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: BY: DATE:

SSK-03
2 -
2 - DEMOLITION SECTION AT EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
(E) WALL(CONCRETE ORMETAL STUD) TOREMAIN (E) FOOTING TO REMAIN
(E) SLAB-ONGRADE TOREMAIN

DEMOLISH (E)STEEL COLUMN

DEMOLISH (E)SLAB-ON-GRADE,GRADE BEAM,AND TOP OF PILECAP 2 -
2 - ENTERPRISE BUILDING OR HARRIS BUILDING

CHIP (E)SLAB-ON-GRADETO FOOTINGCOLD JOINT
1 - PARTIAL FOUNDATION PLAN SIM

DO NOTDEMOLISH PILECAP BELOW THEBOTTOM OF (E)FOOTING TOREMAIN (E) PILE TOREMAIN

TT TO VERIFY (E) FOOTING ANDPOSSIBLE BASEMENT CONDITIONS 2 SSK04
1 SSK04
(N) WALL FINISH/WATERPROOFING/ENCLOSURE REPAIRAS REQUIRED;MATCH (E) 1 SSK04 SIM
(N) CRASH WALL
(N) WALL AT RAMPOR AT STAIR
Schematic Demolition Design Structural Demolition Site Plan Carousel Mall Demolition, San Bernardino, CA Resource Environmental/Thornton Tomasetti RFP Response BMS 9/27/2022    
 Packet Pg. 547
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 29 UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT Schematic Drawings
SSK-04 [folded and stapled attached]
Thumbnail Version
Packet Pg. 548
PROJECT: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: BY: DATE:

SSK-0
4 2
- DEMOLITION SECTION AT WALKWAY AND STAIR TO REMAIN
(E) ELEVATEDPEDESTRIANWALKWAYACROSS NORTHE STREET
1 - WALKWAY DEMOLITION SECTION

DEMOLISH (E)PARKING GARAGEWALKWAY ANDMASONRY PILASTER
(N) CONCRETECRASH WALL,PENDINGARCHITECTURALCODE REVIEWOF MINIMUMEGRESS PATHS

DEMOLISH TWO-STORYCAROUSEL MALLSTRUCTURE

DEMOLISH (E)WALKWAY WALLBEYOND

PARKINGGARAGE SLABTO REMAIN

DEMOLISH TWO-STORYCAROUSEL MALLSTRUCTURE

DEMOLISH (E) CMUWALL OF TWO-STORYCAROUSEL MALLSTRUCTURE (E) STAIR BEYOND TOREMAIN
Schematic Demolition Design Structural Demolition Site Plan Carousel Mall Demolition, San Bernardino, CA Resource Environmental/Thornton Tomasetti RFP Response BMS 9/27/2022    
 Packet Pg. 549
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 30 UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT Schematic Drawings
REI-01 [folded and stapled attached]
Thumbnail Version
Packet Pg. 550
Packet Pg. 551
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 31

UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
Project Design Narrative
Carousel Mall was constructed in the 1970s and is bounded by West 4th Street to the north, North E Street to the east, West 2nd Street to the south, and North G Street to the west, in San Bernadino, California. Thornton Tomasetti will serve as the Structural Engineer of Record for the demolition of the Carousel Mall. Additionally, Thornton Tomasetti will serve as the Architect and Structural Engineer of Record for the design of repairs to the adjacent, to-remain structures (described in further detail below) necessitated by demolition of the adjacent Carousel Mall elements. Repairs are proposed to match the existing finishes to the extent possible and may also require the interface of new waterproofing elements with existing waterproofing elements.

The 2022 California Building Code or 2022 California Existing Building Code, both with City of San Bernadino amendments, will serve as the building codes, as appropriate, for the repair elements at the existing structures, with minimum design loads originating from ASCE 7-16.

Carousel Mall primarily consists of two-story structures, with some former anchor tenant stores such as Montgomery Ward and JCPenney standing three-stories tall, as well as some single-story structures located to the northwest of the main mall. The overall structural demolition of the Carousel Mall consists of removal of the superstructure, the slab-on-grade, and the grade beams and pile caps. The existing pile caps are supported by piles, which will remain beneath the finished grade. The bridge structures which connect the Carousel Mall to the Parking Garage to the northeast of the mall will also be demolished.

Adjacent Structures
Carousel Mall is adjacent to several structures which are to remain following its demolition. The Harris Building is immediately adjacent to the southern portion of Carousel Mall’s east elevation and is excluded from the Carousel Mall demolition scope. Based on visual observations, a portion of the original façade of the Harris Building was previously removed, providing an interconnected interior space with Carousel Mall, and it also appears that the Harris Building and Carousel Mall are seismically separated (albeit by a narrow gap). Existing drawings for the Harris Building have not currently been located, and thus further field investigation will be required to verify the extent of the past façade removal (and thus required façade repair) and to verify that the buildings are fully separated for both seismic and gravity loads. Furthermore, the potential existence of a basement in the Harris Building needs verification. Should a basement exist, an equipment standoff distance from to the west and north sides of the Harris Building will be required to avoid surcharging the Harris Building’s basement walls with loads for which they were likely not originally designed. If a basement does not exist, a field investigation will be required to determine the depth of the existing footings and the removal of any subgrade Carousel Mall elements will need to avoid undermining the Harris Buildings foundations.

After surgical/hand demolition of the footings per the SSK drawings, Resource intends to grind all wall imperfections of concrete and extrusions; apply Carlisle AWP or Polyguard primer to insure proper adhesions, install one (1) layer of Polyguard 640 or Miradri 860 sheet waterproofing membrane as horizontally as possible to minimize vertical seams; mastic and/or caulk all lap joints and terminations of members edges; install one (1) layer of J-Drain, Miradri Drain, or equal drainage boards to ensure proper drainage and protection of waterproofing membrane during backfill; and install 4” perforated pipe, gravel wrapped in Mirafi-140/N 16oz filter fabric at bottom of wall then backfill with ¾” crushed gravel up to 2’ below finished grade.

Similarly, the Enterprise Building is adjacent to the northern portion of Carousel Mall’s east elevation and excluded from demolition. Further field investigation will be necessary prior to the start of demolition to determine the extent, if any, of existing façade removal/repair; the influence of a basement on demolition equipment positions; and/or avoidance of undermining the Enterprise Building’s foundations.

Packet Pg. 552
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 32 An elevated pedestrian walkway, which crosses North E Street and is located to the south of the Enterprise Building will also remain following demolition of Carousel Mall. The elevated pedestrian walkway contains a stair at its northwest end, which is adjacent to portions of the Carousel Mall exterior wall slated for demolition; field investigation will be required to verify the extents of the stair and elevated walkway foundation systems.

The Fairview Ford dealership, located west of Carousel Mall, across North G Street, is also excluded in the Carousel Mall demolition scope.

The Parking Garage located in the northeast quadrant of the site is to remain; however, two pedestrian walkways which connect the Parking Garage to Carousel Mall are slated for demolition. Once demolished, the walkway to the west side of the Parking Garage will leave an opening in the crash wall at the top floor of the Parking Garage.

Similarly, the removal of the pedestrian walkway along the south side of the Parking Garage will create an opening at either the existing stair or ramp, depending on the demolition demarcation. Closing each of the two walkway “openings” with a new concrete wall element is the most straightforward structural solution; however, Thornton Tomasetti will provide a code analysis to identify any egress concerns, which may include the addition of a stair and/or drive the demolition demarcation at the southside existing stair and ramp. An allowance has been provided for this work on the Bid Breakdown, Items CO 1 and CO 2.

Resource intends to crush the concrete on-site and reuse it to fill in voids, create safe grade elevations, and provide for erosion control. Any bare soil areas will be covered in hydroWhile this should be enough to stabilize the site for SWPPP, if the City desires, a temporary storm drain/French drain can be installed. This is shown as CO 3 on the bid breakdown.

It should be noted that aside from the given Allowances, Resource has made educated assumptions to the above and priced accordingly. The engineering and design costs are factored into this pricing and no change orders are anticipated.

Asbestos
To allow for proper pricing of the asbestos abatement work, Resource invited its hazardous material consultant to the site to perform testing and provide a Limited Asbestos Survey. All suspect materials in the Carousel Mall, Automotive Center, Building 2 Outer Building, JC Penney, and Montgomery Ward were tested. These results allowed Resource to eliminate the guesswork in the abatement and provide competitive pricing with full confidence. It likely other proposers did not test or test to this extent and are forced to make expensive assumptions, as well as include the full cost of testing in their proposals. It is of great value to the City to select a contractor with as little guesswork and cost as possible.

Resource is confident in its asbestos pricing and no change orders are anticipated.

Packet Pg. 553
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 33

UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
Project Approach/Executive Summary
Armed with a Limited Asbestos Survey, the Phase I reports, limited as-builts, 4 site-visits, and a visit by its EOR, Resource Environmental, Inc. was exceptionally well prepared, with the ability to calculate pricing and account for what little unknowns were left. Our approach is as follows:

Immediately after the Notice of Award, we will engage key subcontractors, our hazardous material consultant, and EOR to begin the design and submittal process. These include demolition design, architectural design, the comprehensive hazardous material report, abatement workplans, demolition workplans, grading workplans, SWPPP, filing the Notice of Intent with the RWQCB, and crush submittal. We will request preconstruction conferences with the City of San Bernardino, our EOR, and our consultants to ensure all parties have a cohesive understanding of the proposed plan and scheudle. Upon City approval of submittals and designs needed for permits, we will immediately submit to the appropriate City department for review and approval. We will also coordinate all utility shut offs and begin utility investigations. At this time, we will also install the temporary fence and dispatch site security.

After submittals are approved, we will begin to install all pre-demolition erosion control measures to comply with the SWPPP. Concurrently, our asbestos abatement crews will mobilize and begin asbestos abatement and lead abatement. Containments will be set up for interior abatement with 0.02 negative air pressure. Only authorized personnel with the appropriate certificates and training will be allowed to enter.

Abatement will begin immediately in the JC Penny building, but end quickly as well. Our preliminary results indicate a small quantity of asbestos. The crews
We will work the exterior abatement and 2nd floor abatement concurrently, moving to the 1st floor then the basement. Resource will begin working on subsequent areas while awaiting final clearances from the hazardous materials consultant.

As soon as abatement is cleared, our interior demolition crews will begin gutting the building. Since the building is made of concrete, this is necessary for the proper separation of building materials to ensure compliance with City of Los Angeles recycling requirements. This process will take about 1 month. Once complete, a pre-demolition survey will be performed by a licensed civil engineer to document any structural and safety concerns for the commencement of demolition.

Once cleared, we will inform USPS and LAWA of equipment mobilization to begin above ground demolition with the bridge shortly after. We anticipate utilizing 6 excavators (two130k lb. machines and four 96k lb excavators), along with 4 skid steers, a track loader, and a water truck. After demolition and off-haul of above ground construction and demolition debris, we will be beginning shoring at the basement locations. Once the shoring is inspected and approved, we will begin the demolition of the basement structure. Once complete, we will begin to import engineered fill and begin grading operations.

An alternative scenario we would like to propose is to forego the shoring and remove the basement walls in 20-foot sections, simultaneously spreading, backfilling, and compacting crushed concrete to support earth wall integrity. We have checked with our engineers and this scenario is acceptable. This alternate also proposes crushing all of the site concrete for reuse as engineered fill, which has been confirmed by our geotechnical engineers to be an acceptable means of backfill. By utilizing both methods, considerable cost savings are achieved, and right-of-way damage and restoration are avoided.

Regardless of the chosen method, grading operations begin after the removal of the basement. Once the site is graded to all contours and spot elevations, we will install storm drains and catch basins and request grading inspections. During this time, we will also install permanent fence.

Packet Pg. 554
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 34 Once complete, we will request a punch list inspection and complete all necessary punch list items.

Packet Pg. 555
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 35

REFERENCES
Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Demolition [Design-Bid-Build] Resource completed Phase 1 of the Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Demolition and is nearing final completion of the project, with Phase 2 expected to be complete by December 1st of this year.

The Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, or Rancho, dates back to 1888 when indigent patients from the LA County Hospital were relocated to what was then known as the LA County Poor Farm. Originally created to provide work, housing, and medical care to the poor, it rapidly grew into a psychiatric facility. As many of the original buildings are still standing, it is not surprising many documentaries described rumors of the compound being haunted.

The facility still operates today, but in neighboring land. Resource was contracted to abate and demolish over 100 structures, sprawling over 50 acres. Given the age of the buildings, the abatement was extensive, with nearly every building containing 1,000’s of square feet of asbestos and lead. Many had collapsed, vandalized, or were set ablaze, leading to the requirement of a South Coast Air Quality Management District Procedure 5 workplan, which requires thorough decontamination of all surfaces and disposal of all material as friable, hazardous waste.

Resource worked with SCAQMD to allow for limited use of heavy equipment to assist in the remediation efforts. All said, the project included over a million square feet of asbestos abatement, 500,000 square feet of demolition, and over 250,000 square feet of contaminated soil removal – all which Resource self-performed.

Due to the historical significance of the site, the contract also included the “mothballing” of two large buildings – the former Power Plant and the Casa Consuelo building. The mothballing scope of work included clay tile salvage, re-roofing and roof repair, window board-ups, shoring, fencing, the installation of skylight covers.

Client: County of Los Angeles
Contact: Myron Lee, Project Manager
(213) 435-0563 / [email protected]
Value: $14,062,000
Delivery: Design-Bid-Build
Year Completed: Phase 1 – Complete 09/16/2022 | Phase 2 – Est. Completion 12/01/2022 Packet Pg. 556
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 36

REFERENCES
Existing Student Services & Student Activities Demolition [Design-Assist/Design-Bid-Build] The former Existing Student Services and Student Activities Demolition project included the abatement, interior demolition, selective demolition, and razing of multi-story buildings; the installation of new utilities (water main and gas line); the cutting, capping, and isolation of existing utilities; backfill, compaction, and paving of an active roadway; and the building of two certified building pads at the active and occupied El Camino Community College in Torrance, CA. Resource worked with its EOR, Thornton Tomasetti, for structural engineering and design.

The project was in the middle of an active campus and required full time traffic control, pedestrian canopies, and other public protection measures. Throughout this multimillion-dollar project, there were no injuries or incidents.

As such, Resource was given an award by Keenan and Associates, the largest OCIP administrator in the California, for its excellence in safety.

The hazardous material abatement was extensive, including the removal of asbestos contaminated soil in crawlspaces with a vac-loader under regulated conditions. This was completed safely and without incident.

Abatement also included 1,700 SF of acoustic ceiling removal, 360 SF of transite removal, 308 SF of insulation, 21,765 SF of friable floor tile and mastic, and 25,733 SF of non-friable asbestos. All abatement was highly supervised by DSA inspectors and third-party asbestos consultants, and all work was completed safely and without incident.

The demolition included 135,000 square feet over 3 acres and was fast tracked to allow for the new construction to begin as Resource was completing the project. The project required (8) excavators, (2) track loaders, (8) scissor and boom lifts, (6) skid steers, (4) water trucks, as well miscellaneous equipment, to complete the abatement and demolition on time. Resource worked closely with its Design-Build Entity partner, Thornton Tomasetti, for structural calculations, load and weight bearing capacities, and demolition drawings.

The project had a new obstacle – the never seen before COVID-19 pandemic began in the middle of the project and changed the entire work environment with novel safety and health precautions. This included mask, signs, training, and many other safety measures put into place. While this was challenging and new for all involved, the pandemic did not hinder Resource’s operations or the project schedule.

Client: El Camino Community College District
Contact: JoAnn Atienza, Construction Manager
(213) 435-0563 / [email protected]
Value: $3,030,000
Delivery: Design-Assist/Design-Bid-Build
Year Completed: 2020
Packet Pg. 557
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 37

REFERENCES
Compton HS Campus-Wide Structure & Utility Demolition [Design-Bid-Build] Resource Environmental, Inc. successfully completed the hazardous materials abatement, UST removal, utility removal, and razing of all (38) structures on XX acres of the entire high school campus for Compton Unified School District in 2022. There were multiple USTs (underground storage tanks) that were full of fuel and oils that needed to be pumped and triple rinsed per California, Federal and Local regulatory guidelines before removal. All concrete was recycled for reuse for the 30k SF and 45’ deep in some spots backfill and compaction.

The project was subject to very stringent and thorough CPM (critical path method) that Resource created and updated weekly. Adherence was key to avoiding delays on the reconstruction project.

The school had (3) three major fires from the early 1930’s and was rebuilt where these occurred over the years.

This created unknown structures and fire debris that was buried under the new structures. This all had to be cleaned up per new guidelines to allow for a clean build site. Resource used specialty equipment mainly skeleton buckets we had made to syphon through the soil allowing clean soil to drop and the contaminated soil with fire debris to be removed for loading and transport to the appropriate landfills. Hand labor was also used to ensure all debris was cleaned to meet current soil standards for the school’s reconstruction. This also created over 30k linear feet of abandoned utilities encased in concrete that no one was aware from all the build back after the fires.

Resource hired a utility locater to mark (the best they could) to help identify all utilities that were not on any asbuilts or plans. This was a very tedious and slow process to ensure all was removed.

Resource removed (5) time capsules for the 1930’s to 2000’s that were buried and on built into the administration building that had to be sawcut and removed delicately to ensure proper removal. One had a letter and a play billing from 1928. The administration building was 48’ tall with an auditorium attached that was challenging where Resource used an excavator to reach over 50’ to demolish the structure. This has a basement with a UST that was removed 25’ deep under the guidance of the local Fire department per California regulations.

The concrete removal, breaking, processing, and crushing consisted of 14,000 tons to ¾” crushed miscellaneous base for reuse on site.

Client: Compton Unified School District
Contact: Chuck Wren, Construction Manager
(213) 448-8378 / [email protected]
Value: $2,962,260
Delivery: Design-Bid-Build
Year Completed: 2022
Packet Pg. 558
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 38

REFERENCES
LAWA Manchester Square Demolition Phases 1-2 [Design-Build] The LAWA (Los Angeles World Airports) abatement, demolition, and site restoration project for the historic “People Movers Project” that was many years in the making with the planning commission. This was a historic project that started the complete renovation of LAX and the rental car process inside and out of the airport.

Resource worked closely with LAWA and directly with MGJV (Myers-Griffith Joint Venture) in planning and executing the project safely and on time. Resource coordinated public relations efforts with LAWA, MGJV, South Coast Air Quality, Cal-OSHA and other local agencies to mitigate the public’s potential concerns with the high visibility abatement, demolition and restoration work by Resource.

The project was in two phases and consisted of over (40) forty multi story buildings over 120 acres of restoration.

Many of the buildings were adjacent to active businesses as well as a fully occupied school within the middle of the site.

The abatement included over 55,000 square feet of asbestos abetment of friable and non-friable asbestos and lead hazardous materials. There was over 1500 Linear Feet of underground asbestos containing Transite pipe buried that was removed with equipment and hand labor under regulated conditions. The buildings were razed and site restoration was performed on every parcel to allow for a smooth transition for the new construction.

Resource utilized a fleet of over 20 pieces of heavy equipment demolishing multiple buildings at one time in a very short timeline to allow for the construction to start on schedule. This was the first phase of a massive renovation for the City of Los Angeles and Resource was an integral part of being the first of many contractors to complete this historic project. With resource being the first to start the project with abetment and demolition it set the standard from the get go with completing our work on time and without incident and perfect safety record.

Client: Los Angeles World Airports/Myers & Sons-Griffith JV Contact: Linda Hynds, Project Manager
(562) 207-7666 / [email protected]
Value: $4,520,000
Delivery: Design-Build
Year Completed: 2020
Packet Pg. 559
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 39

REFERENCES
LACCD Former Firestone Plant ELAC Demolition [Design-Bid-Build] Resource completed the extensive remediation of the original Firestone Rubber Plant on Firestone Boulevard. The work consisted of a highly complex enclosure of the entire structure due to an “asbestos skim coat” that was applied on the exterior coating. Resource utilized scaffolding to shrink wrap the entire structure, ensuring the achievement of negative air pressure - a requirement under SCAQMD (Air Quality) Rule 1403 for all asbestos work.

This allowed for the asbestos to be remediated using sandblasting methods without exposure to the environment and life.

Due to the high visibility of the project and the complex remediation of the skim coat, Resource worked closely with SCAQMD, asbestos consultants, and LACCD inspectors to ensure the work was done safely with no incidents and zero exposure.

The removal consisted of over 395,000 square feet of asbestos and all the interior walls were stabilized for the loose and flaky lead paint. The roof had multiple layers of asbestos cap sheets and mastic from over 50 years of reroofing. Resource engineered the roof removal using various means, from lifeline installation and cranes to lifts and chutes, to ensure a safe work environment at high elevations. The remediation project was highly complex given the age and size of the structures, as well as highly public given the historical aspect of the plant.

Client: Los Angeles Community College District/National Demolition Contact: Jennifer Perry, President
(310-732-1991 / [email protected]
Value: $3,220,417
Delivery: Design-Bid-Build
Year Completed: 2019
Packet Pg. 560
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 40 LIST OF ADDITIONAL REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS References and additional information available upon request.

Demolition of Buildings 58 & 158, NVBPL [Design-Build]
- REI Contract Value: $1,031,968
- Relevance: Design-Build; Collaborated with EOR; Demo of multi-story concrete bldg.; Crushing concrete; - Scope: Demolition and abatement of 4-story concrete-reinforced military dormitory and selective demolition and abatement of an officer’s building.

Michelson Labs Wings 2-6 Repair, NVBCL [Design-Build] - REI Contract Value: $1,878,075 - Relevance: Design-Build; Collaborated with EOR; Extensive abatement; Demolition - Scope: Selective demolition of floors 2-6 of two laboratory towers and structural demolition of two buildings. Abatement of over 75,000 SF of roofing materials.

Design-Build Repair BEQ 210705, MCBCP [Design-Build]
- REI Contract Value: $649,492
- Relevance: Design-Build; Interior gut; Remediation; Assisted in design drawings - Scope: Selective demolition and full mold remediation of a multistory military dormitory. Included removal of all doors, floor finish to concrete, vanities, mirrors, stud walls, ceiling finish, MEPs, etc.

Design-Build Burroughs MS Site Modernization, LAUSD [Design-Build] - REI Contract Value: $3,491,305
- Relevance: Design-Build; Abatement, selective demo, structural demo; Contract value - Scope: Abatement and interior demolition of 4 multi-story school bldgs. Abatement and structural demolition of 20 additional multi-story school bldgs.

Design-Build Jefferson ES Site Modernization, LAUSD [Design-Build] - REI Contract Value: $3,230,000
- Relevance: Design-Build; Abatement, selective demo, structural demo; Contract value - Scope: Abatement and interior demolition of 4 large school buildings. Comprehensive site demolition.

ACCM asphalt demolition.

Seaside Surplus II Demolition, FORA [Design-Bid-Build]
- REI Contract Value: $3,546,000
- Relevance: Abatement & demo of multi-story concrete bldgs; Utility capping; Permitting; Contract value; Grading
- Scope: Abatement and demolition of 10 3-story concrete military structures, 1 cafeteria, 1 gym, 2 armories, and 6 admin buildings. Abatement was extensive with rare skim coat and vapor blasting.

CEFCU Stadium East Demolition, SJSU [Design-Bid-Build]
- REI Contract Value: $2,252,661
- Relevance: Abatement & demo; Contaminated soil; Grading; Contract value - Scope: Demolition and abatement of east side stadium bleachers at San Jose State University, followed by the removal of 45,000 tons of contaminated soil.

Twin Rivers Site Demolition Phase 1-2, SHRA [Design-Bid-Build] - REI Contract Value: $3,818,000
- Relevance: Abatement & demo; Contaminated soil; Permitting; Utility capping; Contract value - Scope: Abatement and demolition of 93 multi-family housing buildings, including the removal of all underground utilitiesl backfill, compacting, and grading of over 23 acres; and soil remediation.

Batchelor Hall Modernization, UCR [Design-Bid-Build]
- REI Contract Value: $2,397,337
- Relevance: Abatement & demo; Contract value; Surgical demo - Scope: Phased abatement and interior demolition of active school laboratory. Surgical demolition of roof structure.

Packet Pg. 561
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 41 PCGC Demolition of DeWitt Center, Placer County [Design-Bid-Build] - REI Contract Value: $1,413,000
- Relevance: Building separation; Wall restoration; Abatement & demo; Grading - Scope: Abatement and demolition of 14 buildings totaling 109,000 SF with 7 acres of grading, site restoration, and building separation (with build back of two walls).

SMC Math-Science Demolition [Design-Bid-Build]
- REI Contract Value: $1,392,000
- Relevance: Building separation; Extensive abatement; Concrete crushing - Scope: Abatement and demolition of two school buildings totaling over 80,000 SF. Liberal Arts building was connected to a newly built multistory building that required design, engineering, and hand demolition to carefully separate the buildings.
2020 Wildfire Debris Removal & Hazard Tree Removal, CalRecycle [Emergency] - REI Contract Value: $3,565,198
- Relevance: Contract value; Complex abatement & demo; Design-Build like nature [no plans] - Scope: Hazardous ACM removal, debris removal, and demolition of over 100 parcels in 2 months in Mono County, Los Angeles County, and Tulare County for the State of CA wildfire cleanups.

Hinkley Remediation, PG&E [Emergency]
- REI Contract Value: $3,900,000
- Relevance: Contract value; Complex abatement; Soil remediation; Design-Build like nature [no plans[ - Scope: Hazardous material abatement and contaminated soil cleanup of 225 residential and commercial sites in the Town of Hinkley for Pacific Gas & Electric, which was featured in the film Erin Brokovich.

State Route 47 – Schuyler Heim Bridge [TT Design-Build] - TT Contract Value: $1,210,000
- Relevance: Design-Build; Structural engineering for demolition - Scope: Structural eng. services for the demolition of the bridge piers of original Schuyler Heim Bridge.

Provided structural analysis of temp. construction trestle and design of strengthening measures.

Northbay Medical Center Central Utilities Plant Replacement [TT Design-Build] - TT Contract Value: $154,000
- Relevance: Design-Build; Structural engineering for utility circulation route; Design-Build - Scope: Structural eng. for the new central utility plant to replace the existing plant. New plant located across the street, but street serves as major utility circulation route. Ensure tie-ins had no impact on utilities or nearby buildings.

El Camino Hospital – Old Main Demolition [TT Design-Assist] - TT Contract Value: $640,000 [to date] - Relevance: Design-Assist; Structural engineering for complex, phased demo of connected bldgs. - Scope: Structural eng. for demolition of 8-story hospital & ancillary structures. Developed a buttressing scheme for the below-grade basement walls to maintain stability for adjacent, in-service buildings.

El Camino Hospital – Sobrante Pavilion [TT Design-Assist] - TT Contract Value: $1,260,000
- Relevance: Design-Assist; Structural engineering for surgical demo - Scope: Structural eng. for the construction of a 265,000 SF pavilion and parking garage. Required demo of 120,000 SF building immediately adjacent to 3 active buildings with surgical demo of shared footings.

El Camino Hospital – Taube Pavilion [TT Design-Assist]
- TT Contract Value: $1,260,000
- Relevance: Design-Assist; Structural engineering for large-scale partial demolition - Scope: Structural eng. for construction of the 56,000 SF Taube Pavilion, requiring the partial demo of a 9,000 SF active bldg. Performance of lateral analysis of remaining structure for lateral stability.

REQUIRED FORMS
Iran Contracting Act Certification [attachment 2]
Packet Pg. 567
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 47

REQUIRED FORMS
Workers’ Compensation Certification [attachment 3]

Packet Pg. 568
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 48

REQUIRED FORMS
Non-Collusion Declaration [attachment 4]
Packet Pg. 569
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. | Carousel Mall Demolition Project | Proposal| 49

REQUIRED FORMS
Public Works Contractor Registration Certification [attachment 5] Packet Pg. 570
This proposal includes data that may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed outside the City of San Bernardino – in whole or in part – for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, a contract is awarded to this offeror as a result of – or in connection with – the submission of such data, the City of San Bernardino will have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the City of San Bernardino's right to use information contained in the data if it is obtained from another source without restriction.
17991 Cowan Irvine, CA 92614
949-955-2255

CAROUSEL MALL

DEMOLITION

PROJECT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
City of San Bernardino
Attn: Alex Qishta, P.E.
201 N E Street, Suite 200
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Packet Pg. 571
17991 Cowan
Irvine, Ca 92614
949-955-2255

Page 1 ends

Table of Contents

Page 2 ends

Transmittal Cover Letter

Page 3 ends

Executive Summary

Page 5 ends

Proposed Scope of Services

Page 5 ends

Personnel

Page 16 ends

Understanding of Project

Page 27 ends

References & List of Representative
Projects

Page 32 ends

Required Forms
TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Packet Pg. 572 1
September 25, 2022
To: City Council of the City of San Bernardino
Subject: Transmittal Cover Letter
To Whom It May Concern,
AMPCO Contracting is proposing to provide design-build services for the demolition of the Carousel Mall, also known as Central City Mall. AMPCO Contracting, acting as a Design Build Entity, partnered with Thornton Tomasetti, shall offer engineering, abatement, and demolition services which will far exceed all program requirements.

AMPCO Contracting, Inc. is a multi-trade turnkey site preparation/Demolition contractor who has been in business for over 18 years and has completed numerous high-profile projects throughout California including numerous projects in San Bernardino County and has been recently ranked by ENR Magazine as one of the top ten demolition and abatement contractors in the country. AMPCO self-performs its own Demolition, Abatement and Earthwork.

With these three trades being self-performed, AMPCO can strategically schedule, coordinate and overlap the project tasks daily to save time on the overall schedule and facilitate a seamless and productive workflow onsite without interruptions. Attention to detail, along with an experienced project management team allow the work to be completed safely and timely.

AMPCO holds a General Engineering Class A license, as well as a General Contracting B license, in addition to a Class C-21 Building Moving Demolition license. Working with and managing several subcontractors is a common occurrence with many of our projects. We have fostered and maintained many relationships with subcontractors and material suppliers to facilitate the needs of our work. Lead times and procurement schedules are discussed and confirmed with all subcontractors and vendors to properly plan and schedule the work. You, like us, know that time is of the essence. With a detailed Purchase Order and Subcontract Agreement, we set expectations and terms with our vendors and subcontractors.

Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., is a multi-practice firm that optimizes the deconstruction, design and performance of structures, materials and systems for projects of every size and level of complexity. An employee-owned organization of engineers, scientists, architects and other professionals collaborating from offices worldwide, they support clients by drawing on the diverse expertise of their integrated practices. With over 70 years of being in business and more than 90,000 projects, Thornton Tomasetti has significant experience in nearly every market sector and is well-positioned to address any engineering concerns throughout the deconstruction process.

Additionally, Thornton Tomasetti’s experience in design and forensics combined with industry-leading knowledge in modeling and simulation gives us unequaled expertise in deconstruction engineering. Thornton Tomasetti’s professionals develop highly accurate models of structural behavior to assess and reduce vulnerability and risk during implosion, deconstruction or dismantlement. They help demolition contractors by providing engineering reviews, calculating debris footprints, analyzing stresses and vibrations, and helping to develop safe and efficient demolition scenarios and logistics plans. With a deep understanding of every single step of the construction process, the properties of and interactions among building elements, Thornton Tomasetti provides useful insights into the demolition process, particularly in the case of unusual geometries, materials or loads. They have pioneered the use of NLFlex for modeling demolitions. Developed in-house (in collaboration with the United Stated Department of Defense), NLFlex was created to predict blast and progressive collapse scenarios. Its results have been thoroughly validated against physical test data and has become an excellent tool to model demolitions.

Packet Pg. 573 2
Executive Summary
AMPCO Contracting is proposing to provide design-build services for the demolition of the Carousel Mall, also known as Central City Mall. AMPCO Contracting, acting as a Design Build Entity, partnered with Thornton Tomasetti, shall offer engineering, abatement, and demolition services.

General Description of Design-Build Services:

Phase 1: - Initial Hazardous Materials Survey Report and Pre-Demolition Engineering:
o Prepare asbestos and lead report.
o Prepare an engineered demolition plan, including preliminary schematic drawings. o Determine extent of vibration monitoring and mitigation steps required during demolition. o Determine any required post demolition inspection efforts of Harris, Enterprise, and Parking Structure.

Phase 2: - Make Ready:
• File Permits and Notifications:
o Rule 1403 Notification of Asbestos Removal and Demolition. o Title 8 CCR Section 5203 Temporary Worksite Notification (Report of Regulated Carcinogen Use including AsbestosRelated Work) to Cal/OSHA. o Submit Demolition Permit application, plans and supporting documents to City of San Bernardino for plan check review and approval to issue permit for the demolition of the buildings. • Utilities Disconnection and Safe-off.
• Site Preparation:
o Apply for temporary hydrant meter
o Install temporary construction fence with wind screen around perimeter of the site for site security. o Install jobsite office container/trailer, storage container(s), roll-off trash bin, temporary toilets and sinks at laydown area.
o Install jobsite signage throughout the site.
o Provide engineered SWPPP with Erosion Control Plan.
o Install erosion control best management practices (BMPs) throughout site.

Phase 3: - Abatement & Interior Demolition:
• Hazardous Material Abatement and Disposal.
• Removal of Universal Waste.
• Interior Demolition of any areas not impacted by Hazardous Materials.

Phase 4: - Above Grade Demolition:
• Building Structures
• Bridges
Phase 5: - Below-Grade Excavation & Demolition:
• Building Slab
• Building Continuous & Spread Footings
• Excavate and remove any retaining walls, footings, and column spread footings.

Phase 6: - Site Improvements:
• Demolish and remove concrete and asphalt paving, curbs, and gutters as necessary to accommodate a 40’ easement/boundary around the perimeter of the Carousel Mall and on-site Structures to demolish walls, footings, and foundations. • Excavate and remove underground utilities within the building footprints. • Cap sewer lateral(s) at the property line. Record as-built location and depth. • Grade and compact soil on site as needed for backfill and grading of voids created from removal of Basements, building foundations and underground utilities.
• Final grading to provide site drainage per the requirements of the SWPPP to provide drainage towards the “pit” left behind from demolition since no material is to be left on site or imported from outside of the jobsite.

AMPCO will assume and provide 24/7/365 days security of the mall upon approval of the demolition proposal by the Mayor and Council of the City of San Bernardino.

Packet Pg. 574 3
Proposed Scope of Services
AMPCO Contracting, Inc. acting as a Design-Build Entity shall function “at risk” for full and satisfactory completion of the Carousel Mall demolition with exception to: Harris Building, Fairview Chevrolet, Enterprise Building, and the Mall Parking Structure, in coordination with:

1. The approved design and construction documents.

2. The required agency approvals.

3. The Project Completion Date.

4. The agreed Lump Sum Price.

Proposed Description of Design-Build Services:

AMPCO Contracting, Inc. shall provide all services necessary to perform the abatement and demolition scopes of work on this project, which include the following:

1. Architectural and engineering design services including:
a. Define scope of demolition to determine what extent of buildings, parking lots, and subsurface infrastructure needs to be demolished.
b. Review existing Phase 1 site evaluation report for contamination, prepare an updated site evaluation report (“Phase 2”) and prepare an asbestos/lead/hazardous material survey report. c. Prepare hazardous material remediation work plan including SCAQMD Procedure 5 plan for submission and approval as required prior to performing work.
d. Engineering and evaluation of the demolition to ensure no conflict with other buildings to remain (Harris Building, Enterprise, Parking Structure.)
i. Evaluate and include the demolition of the Carousel Mall from the Harris Department Store building including:

1. Structural Stability as a result of separation/demolition.

2. Capping of utilities.

3. Closing the existing opening between the Carousel Mall and the Harris Building. ii. Evaluate and include the demolition of the Carousel Mall from the Andersen/Enterprise building including:

1. Structural Stability as a result of separation/demolition.

2. Capping of utilities.

3. Closing the existing opening between the Carousel Mall and the Andersen/Enterprise Building.

2. Submit complete cost estimate for the abatement and demolition.

3. Present to the City, demolition plans and submit a construction schedule for that purpose.

4. Provide 24/7/365 days of security of the mall upon approval of the demolition proposal by the Mayor and Council of the City of San Bernardino.

5. Permitting submittal and approvals from local, state, and federal agencies and jurisdictions.

6. Coordination of payment of all fees associated with the permitting and approvals of plans and notifications to the appropriate agencies (including but not limited to The City of San Bernardino, South Coast Air Quality Management District, CAL-OSHA, etc.)

7. Full Construction Management Team including Architects, Engineers, Environmental Consultants, and in-house fulltime Project Management.

8. Demolition and Hazardous Materials Abatement of the Carousel Mall, JC Penny Building, Montgomery Ward Building, and two former auto service buildings.

9. Decommissioning of systems and utilities within the footprint of the demolition.

10. Coordination and scheduling work of Design-Build Team and other subcontractors and vendors providing services of design, abatement, and demolition of the Project.

11. All on-site grading and storm water compliance to make safe any voids and grade changes as a result of demolition.

12. Insurance and bonding.

13. Coordination with City representatives as required throughout the project to update progress and address any concerns or issues that may arise during the project.

14. Representation, attendance, and involvement of any community meetings as may be required.

Packet Pg. 575 4
AMPCO CONTRACTING, INC. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

N A M E
Andrew Pennor

R O L E
President
Summary of Experience
Licensed Contractor in the State of California, with over 25 years of experience. Currently serving on the Board of Directors for several companies Andrew founded and that are currently active. Andrew has grown multiple companies from one employee to over 400 employees grossing over $130 million in annual sales. He has the ability to manage all facets of the business from operations, project management, sales, marketing, accounting, and estimating within the Demolition, Asbestos Abatement and Earthwork Industries.

Professional EXPERIENCE
• Owner / Board of Directors
AMPCO Contracting, Inc.

AMPCO North, Inc.

AMPCO SPG
Earthscapes Inc.

KML Services, Inc.

Redwood Development Llc.

Imperial Equipment
• Ampco Contracting, Inc.

President
2004 - Current
• Union Environmental, Inc
Executive Vice President
Anaheim, CA.
2002 - 2004
Proficiencies
• Managed all field operations, safety, and
contract performance. Estimated projects.

Managed and directed all aspects of the
accounting, sales, and marketing departments. Managed and oversaw the Demolition, Asbestos, Earthwork, Environmental, Power,
and Site Clearing Departments. Started and
completed over 300 commercial Demolition,
Earthwork, Site Utilities and Asbestos Abatement projects Education, Licenses, Registrations
& Training
• State Of California Contractor
License A, B, C-21, C-22, ASB, HAZ, DOSH
• OSHA 30
• First Aid & CPR
• Orange Coast College
Major: Construction Management
Projects
• The Porsche Experience Center
Landfill Remediation
Methane Gas Collection System
Abatement, Demolition-Site Clearing and
Earthwork
• San Joaquin Plaza
Demolitions (Site Clear), Mass Excavation
Export of 250,000 CY & Backfill 100,000 CY
• Talaria
Earthwork
• Culver Studios
Swinerton - Los Angeles, CA
• Google Hercules Hanger
Abatement & Demolition - Los Angeles, CA
• Porsche Training Center -
Multi-phase - Carson, CA
• Citrus Heights City Hall - Abatement &
Demolition - Citrus Heights, CA
• California High School
Abatement, Lead, Demo. & Earthwork, -
Whittier, CA
• Marywood Hills (Jun 2016) - Abatement,
Lead and Demolition - Orange, CA
Charity / Philanthropy
• City of Hope
• CIA
Board of Directors
Packet Pg. 576 5
AMPCO CONTRACTING, INC. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Education, Licenses, Registrations &
Accomplishments

N A M E
Reggie Kama
R OLE
Chief Operations Officer
Professional EXPERIENCE
Technical Proficiencies
• ExtEnsivE computEr skills, including foun-dation, b2w Estimating & track, onscrEEn takEoff, bluEbEam, ms officE, projEct.

Summary of Experience
For the past two years I have been the Chief Operations Officer for AMPCO Contracting, a General Contractor specializing in demolition, environmental abatement and earthwork leading and managing the Operations department. For the eight years prior, I was the lead Project Manager for AMPCO. In my time here, my skills and experience have contributed to the company's success, which has grown from $15M to $60M in annual revenue. • Palomar Heights - Integral Communities
Escondido, CA
• County of Orange Building 14 - Swinerton
Builders
Santa Ana, CA
• Boeing Phase 2 and 3 - Sares Regis Group
Huntington Beach, CA
• Orange County Great Parks - Five Point
Communities/City of Irvine
Irvine, CA
• Google Spruce Goose - Matt Construction
Los Angeles, CA
• Pratt Whitney Rocketdyne - C.W. Driver
Canoga Park, CA
• Arden Way Demolition - Safeway LLC
El Monte, CA
• Agnews Demolition - City of San Jose
San Jose, CA
• Christ Cathedral- Cannon Building Services
Garden Grove, CA
• Anaheim Concourse - Pannattoni Development
Anaheim, CA
AUG 2020 - Present
JUL 2015 - AUG 2020
AUG 2012 - JUL 2015
APR 2009 - APR 2012
MAY 2007 - APR 2009
• AMPCO Contracting, Inc. Chief
Operations Officer
Senior Project Manager
Project Manager
• Union Environmental, Inc.

Project Manager
Project Engineer
• Beacon Site Developers, Inc.

Project Manager AUG 2009 - APR
2012

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Colorado State University, BFA - 2004
• OSHA 30 Hour Construction License 9534146
• South Coast Air Quality Management District Fugitive Dust Control Certification License SC13-04-4996
• South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1403 Certification License 374864
• G3 GHS for Managers, Supervisors, Safety Personnel
License 9879897
Packet Pg. 577 6
AMPCO CONTRACTING, INC. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Education, Licenses, Registrations &
Training
• OSHA 30-hour License
• First Aid, CPR & AED Certificate
• RRP Lead Certification
• Confined Space Safety Certification
• Construction/Building Skills:

General Contracting; All Trade Plan Reading; take
off/estimating; Structural Framing; Interior Design;
Residential/Commercial Building; Project Supervision/Management; Interior/Utility/Site-Clear Demolition; Abatement; Grading; Cost Projection,
Contract/Change Order Draft & Review.
• Finance Skills:

Accounts Payable/Receivable; Intimate with Quickbooks & Foundation; Experience with Textura; Budget & Expense Forecasting; Payroll & Human
Resources; Certified Payroll.
• Sales Skills:

Pipeline Management; CRM Software; Asset
Prospecting; Client Relations; Account Forecasting;
Communication; Negotiation
• Management Skills:

Project Management & Supervision; Contract Administration; Labor Compliance. • Additional Computer Skills:

Expert in Microsoft Office Suite including Excel,
Project, Power Point, Word, and Visio; Experience
with Share-point Servers; Expert Computer Technician including hardware configuration and software installation for computers, servers and printers.

N A M E
Michael Donnelly
R OLE
Project Manager
Professional Experience
AMPCO Contracting Anaheim, CA
Project Manager 1/2019-Present
• Performed scheduling and managed deliveries for
5+ projects at a time
• Coordinate project precon meetings, draft project
submittals, and work plans.
• Negotiate subcontracts and pricing for subcontractors and vendors for each project. • Reviewed contracts and changes to the contracts
for each project
• Organized and managed monthly meetings for the
company
• Perform budget and cost analysis of each project.
• Review billing and invoicing for subcontractors
and vendors
Home Beach Designs Hermoso Beach, CA
Project Manager/Super. 9/2015-12/2018
• Supervise, schedule trades/subcontractors, quality
control, and inspection sign-off for 5+ residential
and commercial building projects annually.
• Estimates, project buyouts, and contract/change
order negotiation for proposed projects.
• Design, layout, install procedure for structural &
Finish scope of all projects.
• Review/approve subcontractor billings every
month for each project.
• Provide/schedule material deliveries for all trades.
• Construction plans & permit submittal/corrections to obtain city approval.

Landmark Dividend LLC El Segundo, CA
Vice Pres. of Acquisitions 10/2012-08/2015
• Closed over $5 Million in business with 25+ acquired billboard and cellular easements. • Developed, managed and accurately forecasted
personal sales acquisition pipeline of over 300+
accounts.
• Performed 100+ ground lease review and analysis
in order to place a valuation and purchase price
for individual assets.
• Managed transactions from inception through
closing. Performed lease review, pricing
evaluation, proposal submission, and contract negotiations. ...
7 Packet Pg. 578
AMPCO CONTRACTING, INC. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NAME
Adrian Moreno
R OLE
Demolition
Superintendent

SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE
Over 25 years of demolition experience in infrastructure, airports, freeways, public works projects, design-build, government and housing.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• AMPCO Contracting, Inc.

Superintendent AUG 2020 - Present
Demo Foreman JUN 2015 - AUG 2020

PROFICIENCIES

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• NCM
Operator
MAR 2011 - JUN 2015
• CST Environmental
Demo and Abatement Laborer
JUN 2007 - APR 2011

EDUCATION, LICENSES,

REGISTRATIONS & TRAINING
• First Aid, CPR & AED
• Lock-out / Tag-out
• Fall Protection
• Trenching / Excavation
• Demolition Safety
• Silica Dust
• Job Hazard Analysis
• Construction/Building Skills:

General Contracting, all trade plan reading,
Residential/Commercial Building; Project
Supervision/Management, Interior/Utility/Site-Clear
Demolition, Abatement, Grading, Cost Projection,
Contract/Change Order Draft & Review
• Finance Skills:

Budget & Expense Forecasting
• Management Skills:

Project Management & Supervision; Contract
Administration, Labor, safety and environmental
compliance.

Boeing Phase 2
Huntington Beach, CA
Palomar Heights
Escondido, CA
Egyptian Theatre
Hollywood, CA
Orange County Great Park Runway
Ph2 Demo & Crushing
Irvine, CA
Former R.H Dana Middle School
Wiseburn USD
El Segundo, CA
County Building 14
Santa Ana, CA
8 Packet Pg. 579
AMPCO CONTRACTING, INC. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NAME
Matthew Suiter

R O L E
Health & Safety Director
Summary of Experience
AMPCO is a Flagship company in the construction industry, leading the way with its focus on health and safety.

I have 30 years’ experience in construction and management completing projects in the public, private and federal industry. Specializing in the demolition field I have completed projects requiring hazardous materials abatement, structural demolition, coordination of multiple trades and, of course, safety. The last 11 of those years have been dedicated to developing and managing health and safety programs as a member of the Health and Safety Committee.

I am proud to be a part of a company so committed to the health and well-being of its employees.

This safety role is to implement the company’s safety plan by continuing to update and expand the IIPP, provide onsite training, manage documentation, audit job sites for safety compliance, manage loss prevention, draft and review site specific safety work plans, manage and consult on workers compensation needs, coordinate with employees, subcontractors and ownership on all aspects of the expectations for a safe working environment. • Boeing Huntington Beach - Sares Regis Group
Abatement & Demolition, Los Angeles, CA
• Palomar Heights - Integral Communities
Demolition, Escondido, CA
• San Manuel Landing - Trammell Crow
Earthhwork, Highland, CA
• Citrus Heights City Hall - Abatement &
Demolition, Citrus Heights, CA
• California High School -Abatement, Lead,
Demo. & Earthwork, Whittier, CA
Education, Licenses, Registrations &
Training
• OSHA 30
• First Aid / CPR Certified
• 40 HR Asbestos Contractor / Supervisor
• 40 HR CDPH Lead Supervisor
• 40 HR Hazwoper Site Worker
• Fall Protection
• Heat Illness Prevention
• Lock-Out Tag-Out
• Hearing Conservation
• Advanced Cal Flagger for Construction
• Forklift Operator
• Skid Steer Operator
• Aerial Lift operator

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
AMPCO Contracting, Inc. -
Safety Officer
February 2022 – Current
Suiter's Landscape Management -
May 2017-February 2022
AMPCO North, Inc -
Safety Officer
August 2015 – May 2017
AMPCO Contracting -
Safety Officer
April 2008-August 2015

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
9 Packet Pg. 580
Education
• Ph.D., Civil Engineering, 2006, Columbia University
• M.Sc., Civil Engineering, 2003, New Jersey Institute of Technology
• B.Sc., Civil Engineering, 2000, Sharif University of Technology Registrations
• Licensed Professional Engineer in CA
Professional activities
• Vice-chair, Fire Protection Committee of American Society of Civil Engineers
• Member, Dynamics Committee, American Society of Civil Engineers
• Member, Structural Health Monitoring and Control
Committee, American Society of Civil Engineers
• Member, Fire Codes Committee, ACEC Metro Region
• Member, American Institute of Steel Construction
• Reviewer, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
• Reviewer, Journal of Engineering Mechanics
• Reviewer, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities • Reviewer, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
• Reviewer, Journal of Fire Safety
Select project experience
680 Madison Avenue, New York, NY. Structural engineering services during demolition and reconstruction of portions of a 17-story residential building. Design of shoring was provided to ensure stability of the building during construction. The construction includes major demolition of multiple floors at the base of the structure while stabilizing the superstructure. 1 Madison Avenue, New York, NY. Structural engineering for safe demolition of a significant portion of the existing 16-story reinforced concrete building to allow for improved geometry, introduction of new concrete core, and addition of floors on top of the buildings. The demolition work is sequenced to allow for simultaneous progress of the new construction and to maintain integrity of the parts of the building that remain. The design also ensures safety of adjacent historic buildings and MTA facilities.

Manhattanville, New York, NY. Deconstruction engineering services and on-site work related to planning, engineering and building deconstruction of numerous existing buildings. Scope included evaluation and analysis of key aspects of the current as-built conditions to review the adequacy of both the gravity and lateral designs as they related to the means and methods of deconstruction and for compliance to local, state and federal codes.

Queens Detention Center, Queens, NY. Hard demolition
consulting services for the detention center in Queens. The scope includes the full demolition of the detention center.

Oversaw the structural analyses to evaluate the capacity of the existing gravity system for construction and mechanical equipment loads. Assisted in investigating the demolition sequence, coordination, and generation of drawings for filing and permit purposes.
321 E 13th Street, New York, NY. Structural engineering services for safe demolition of a 14-story reinforced concrete building. The design also ensures safety of adjacent buildings and MTA facilities.
341-347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY. Structural engineering services for safe demolition of three side-by-side existing building with steel framing and concrete floors. The design also ensures safety of adjacent buildings and MTA facilities. 405 Park Avenue, New York, NY. Structural engineering services for safe demolition of the existing 17-story steel structure with concrete floors. The design also ensures safety of adjacent buildings and MTA facilities.

ALI ASHRAFI, PH.D., P.E., LEED AP
Principal
Summary
Ali Ashrafi joined Thornton Tomasetti in 2006 and is a member of our Forensics practice and its Advanced Analytics group. He has extensive experience in structural design and modifications, seismic and wind performance-based design, advanced analytics, nonlinear and dynamic analysis, deconstruction engineering, emergency response and forensic investigation.

Packet Pg. 581 10
CHUKWUMA EKWUEME, PH.D., P.E., S.E., LEED AP
Principal
Summary
Dr. Chukwuma Ekwueme is a principal in the Structural Engineering practice. In a career spanning some three decades, he has developed an extensive background in the design and analysis of a wide variety of structure types and materials. Chukwuma is skilled in the analysis and design of earthquake-resistant structures and is adept at improving structural performance by using advanced technology such as base isolation, external dampers and fiber-reinforced composites.

He has provided failure-analysis and expert- witness support for numerous projects, including the World Trade Center collapse in New York City. Chukwuma is also a lecturer in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of California, Los Angeles where he teaches courses on reinforced concrete and masonry design.

Education
• Ph.D., Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering
Concentration), 1994, University of California, Los Angeles • Engr., (Degree of Engineer), 1992, University of California, Los Angeles
• M.S., Civil Engineering (Structural and Earthquake Engineering Concentration), 1990, University of California, Los Angeles • B.Eng., Civil Engineering, 1987, University of Nigeria Registrations
• Licensed Structural Engineer in CA
• Licensed Professional Engineer in CA
• LEED AP
• Certified DSA Structural Plan Reviewer
Professional activities
• Member, Structural Engineering Institute
• Member, Structural Engineers Association of California • Voting Member, TMS 402/602 Main Committee, The
Masonry Society
• Past Member, Passive Energy Dissipation Committee,
Existing Buildings Committee, Structural Engineers
Association of California
• Member, American Concrete Institute
Select project experience
Grauman’s Egyptian Theatre, Demolition, Hollywood, CA.

Demolition engineering for a historic theater undergoing major renovations. Project scope includes a structural assessment focused on concrete topping slabs and subsequent design recommendations and a demolition plan to ensure safe removal.

City of Beverly Hills, Coldwater Canyon Reservoir and Park, Excavation Review, Beverly Hills, CA. Structural review of the design of the temporary support of excavation for an 8.3-milliongallon reservoir. A new park with an all-weather track, drought tolerant landscaping and numerous hiking trails was placed above the reservoir.

San Diego FBI Field Office Complex, San Diego, CA.

Structural, seismic and blast engineering for a six-story office building of approximately 235,000 square feet; a 30,000-squarefoot, one-story annex; a six-story, 130,000-square-foot parking facility; and a 90-foot pedestrian bridge that connects the parking structure to the office building.

Italian Hall at El Pueblo de Los Angeles National Monument, Los Angeles, CA. Structural engineering for the renovation and upgrade of Italian Hall at El Pueblo de Los Angeles National Monument to obtain a certificate of occupancy, and design of the seismic strengthening of the building’s south wall utilizing a performance-based design approach.
419 S. Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA. Structural engineering for the renovation and seismic upgrade of a 14-story historical building. Structural alterations involved the removal of portions of the slab above the fourth floor to create a light well that will allow for natural ventilation and light in all hotel rooms.

The French Market, West Hollywood, CA. Structural
engineering for a four-story, 195,000-square-foot, mixed-use building housing three levels of creative office space with outdoor terraces as well as a lobby, restaurants, retail, additional offices and storage at ground level. The building will incorporate portions of a historic structure that will be suspended above two subterranean levels.
5405 Jandy Place, Los Angeles, CA. Structural engineering for the adaptive reuse of an existing warehouse building to a 63,000-square-foot creative office space. The renovations encompass removing the existing mezzanine and adding
a second floor with multiple openings to the ground floor.

Packet Pg. 582 11
ALBERTO CUEVAS, PH.D.

Vice President
Summary
Alberto Cuevas has been involved with the design, assessment, deconstruction, retrofit, inspection and peer review of low-to-mid-rise commercial, residential, industrial, hospital, office and education buildings, and with the design of telecommunications infrastructure. He has worked on projects in various countries, including Costa Rica, New Zealand, United States and Mexico. His expertise in design,assessment and deconstruction focuses on steel, reinforced concrete and masonry structures. Alberto is proficient in linear and nonlinear analysis of structures and in nonlinear finite micro-element modeling of structural components. He also serves as an expert for the Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, where he provides peer reviews for various papers related to earthquake engineering prior to publishing. Alberto is fluent in both Spanish and English.

Education
• Ph.D., Civil Engineering, 2019, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
• M.S., Earthquake Engineering & Engineering Seismology, 2013, Rose School / University of Pavia
• B.E., Civil Engineering (with Honors), 2002, University of Costa Rica
Registrations
• Licensed Civil Engineer in Costa Rica
Professional activities
• Member, American Society of Civil Engineers
• Member, Rotary Club of Downtown Los Angeles
• Peer reviewer, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Select project experience
City of Santa Monica, Parking Structure 3, Santa Monica, CA. Demolition engineering for the three-phase demolition of a parking structure located on a major street. The City plans to use the space for future affordable housing. The team coordinated with the city to close off areas to the public as needed and provided safety recommendations and temporary shoring
design to avoid debris fall-out on nearby structures and ensure lateral stability.

Grauman’s Egyptian Theatre, Demolition, Hollywood, CA.

Arecibo Radio Telescope, Arecibo, PRI. Development of
procedures for failed replacement of several ruptured cables and, upon collapse, provided clean-up services to restore the site to a safe working condition and investigated the cause of the collapse.

Demolition of Duke Energy, Asheville Plant, Asheville, NC.

Implosion analyses to evaluate the implosion plan and predict the ground vibrations due to simultaneous implosion of boiler units #1 and #2. Our recommendations resulted in changing the plan from explosive felling to mechanical deconstruction. Our analyses were vital to mitigating the risks to adjacent assets and managing the safety of the demolition of the two boiler units.

Confidential Investigation, Confidential Location. Forensic services during the investigation of a post-tensioned concrete roof slab that exhibited cracking and leaked. The two-story building utilizes its roof slab for car storage. The scope of work included analysis and calculations to determine if the slab design was code compliant; to determine the likely cause of cracking; to evaluate the structural integrity of the slab; and to provide slab repair recommendations.

Confidential Investigation, Confidential Location. Forensic investigation to determine the extent of damage to an existing building due to adjacent recent construction. Scope included the assessment of the structural integrity of building components and repair recommendations to correct the damage.

Confidential Project, Various Locations, MEX. Structural engineering for damage assessment, repair and retrofit for several buildings damaged by an earthquake. Services included scope of damage, intrusive and non-intrusive investigations, post-earthquake seismic evaluation and analysis and design of conceptual and detailed retrofit projects.

Confidential Crane Collapse, Confidential Location. Consulting during the investigation of a crane collapse at a confidential construction site. The crane was starting the breakdown procedure when the main and luffing boom collapsed.

University of California, Irvine, Seismic Evaluations, Irvine, CA. Seismic building evaluations for more than 100 academic, residential and administrative buildings across the UCI Campus, UCI Medical Center and associated properties. A portion of the surveys included adhere to ASCE 41-17, Tier 1 or FEMA P154 seismic evaluation standards. The scope also includes peer review services.

Packet Pg. 583 12
Education
• M.S., Structural Engineering, 2014, Columbia University • B.S., Civil Engineering, 2012, Technological Education Institute of Piraeus
Registration
• Licensed Professional Engineer in NY
Select project experience
One Madison Avenue, New York, NY. Hard demolition
consulting services for mid-rise in New York City. The scope included the demolition of the top six floors and a large core throughout the building which would allow the construction of the new core supporting the new steel structure built above the existing structure. Performed detailed structural analyses to evaluate the capacity of the existing gravity and lateral system for temporary conditions and construction loads.

Designed and detailed temporary bracing and shoring systems as needed to maintain the structural integrity of the structure during work. Responsible for investigating the demolition sequence, coordination, and generation of drawings for filing and permit purposes. Conducted routine field inspections and special inspections as required by the Department of Buildings.

Provided contractor support during demolition work.

Confidential Infrastructure Project, New York, NY.

Sustainability, structural engineering, and protective design for proposed major transportation hub. Responsible for designing temporary protection platforms for the public and construction crews during crane operations and investigating a conceptual crane staging sequence for deconstruction of parts of the existing building. Investigated steel erection schemes including the design of temporary trusses to support the structure while removing portions of the building. Performed structural analysis of existing underground structures for impact due to crane loads.

One James River Plaza, Richmond, VA. Hard demolition
consulting services for 22-story structure. Scope included the mechanical demolition of the plaza and two sub-grade levels outside of the main tower outline to allow the implosion of the main tower. Analyzed the lateral stability and integrity of the remaining tower structure for applicable wind loads, assessed the capacity of slabs and existing structural framing, and investigated feasibility of structure weakening strategies pre- implosion. Assisted in analyzing the existing structure for imposed machinery loads. Responsible for generation of drawings for construction purposes.
341, 343, 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY. Hard demolition consulting services for mid-rise buildings in New York City. The scope includes the full demolition of all three buildings to allow the construction of a new tower. Performed detailed structural analyses to evaluate the capacity of the existing gravity system for construction and mechanical equipment loads. Responsible for investigating the demolition sequence, coordination, and generation of drawings for filing and permit purposes.

Conducting routine field inspections and special inspections as required by the Department of Buildings. Providing contractor support during demolition work.

Queens Detention Center, Queens, NY. Hard demolition
consulting services for the detention center in Queens. The scope includes the full demolition of the detention center.

UMass, Student Union Renovation, Amherst, MA. Structural, building envelope, building analysis, and LEED consulting services for the renovation of the 101,000-square-foot student union building. Responsible for analyzing the existing structure against lateral loads to determine structural integrity during demolition work. Designed and detailed temporary cable
systems for lateral stability and generated drawings.

NICHOLAS KATSANDONIS, P.E.

Associate
Summary
Nicholas Katsandonis is an Associate in the Forensic practice at Thornton Tomasetti’s New York office. Nicholas joined Thornton Tomasetti in 2018 with experience in structural analysis in both concrete and steel structures for commercial and residential high-rise buildings. While at Thornton Tomasetti, Nicholas has gained experience in demolition engineering, structural stabilization, building condition assessments and structural failure investigations. 13 Packet Pg. 584
BRUCE K. ARITA, AIA
Senior Vice President
Summary
Bruce Arita is a forensic architect in Thornton Tomasetti’s Western U.S. Region. He has served as architect-of-record for public and private buildings and project developments of diverse scale and complexity throughout Southern California. His specialized expertise includes exterior envelope diagnostics, damage determination (cause and origin), moisture intrusion analysis, property due diligence evaluations and building repair programs. Bruce has been the lead investigator on numerous assignments where expert investigation, consulting, and sworn testimony have been requested.

Areas of Technical Expertise
• Forensic Architecture and Complex Investigations
• Standard of Care
• Technical Architecture
Education
• B.S., Architecture, 1977, California State Polytechnic University Registrations
• Registered Architect in CA
• Safety Assessment Program (SAP) Evaluator, Post-Earthquake Evaluation of Buildings, California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA)
Professional Activities
• Member, American Institute of Architects (AIA)
• Member, International Code Council
• Part-time Instructor, Rancho Santiago College, Architectural Studies, 1983-1993
• Instructor, CAI Education Leadership Training Program, Building Maintenance and Repair, 2004-present
Honors and Awards
• Educator of the Year, CAI Orange County, 2006
• Committee Member of the Year, CAI, 2005
Select Project Experience
Forensic Architecture and Complex Investigations
World Trade Center, Towers 2, 3 and 4 - CAT 90-Sandy,
New York, NY. Damage determination and project director for evaluation for three towers in the aftermath of CAT 90-Sandy.

Meat Processing Plant, Fire Response and Claim Evaluation, Cudahy, WI. Detailed structural and architectural evaluation and documentation of fire damage to a 120-year-old, 1.2-millionsquare-foot meat-processing plant, including material testing and investigation of process equipment and MEP components throughout the facility.

Royal Hawaiian Theater, Exterior Finish System (EFS)
Investigation, Honolulu, HI. Forensic investigation services for a theater located within a retail center including a site visit and examination of exterior and interior wall conditions, and forensic (invasive) examination of wall assemblies.

Standard of Care
Valley Constr. v. Windsor Creek Apartments, Walnut Creek, CA. Standard of care evaluation regarding architect-of-record for a multi-family residential project.

Newport Nat’l v. Nadel-Ventana, Carlsbad, CA. Expert
testimony of architectural standard of care and sufficiency of plans and specifications.

Voskanian Constr. v. Alhambra Unified Sch. Dist.,
Alhambra, CA. Expert evaluation of extra work claims presented by general contractor for work performed at a school site and effect of alleged deficient plans and specifications.

Technical Architecture
City of Ontario Fire Stations 6, 7 and 8, Ontario, CA.* Architectural design services.

City of Ontario, Westwind Park Gymnasium and Park
Facilities, Ontario, CA.* Architectural design services. *Denotes work performed with previous employer.

SEPTEMBER 2022 1
14 Packet Pg. 585
Orange County Transportation Agency, Orange, CA.* Roof
repair project.

Sworn Testimony
Trial and Deposition, State Restoration, Inc. v. Encino Oaks HOA, et al regarding building code analysis of fire damaged residential structures in Los Angeles, CA. August 2022; July 2022.

Deposition, Sandoval v. HMC Architects, Inc., et al regarding standard of care and performance of architect in connection with design and construction administration of a public works facility in Los Angeles County, CA. September 2021.

Deposition, Northrup Grumman v. AON regarding wind and
water damage resulting from Hurricane Katrina. 2016
Deposition, JA Rodeo LLC v. Brackett Constr. regarding
architectural details and specifications for a restaurant addition in Beverly Hills, CA. February 2014.

Trial, Valley Constr. v. Windsor Creek Apartments regarding architectural standard of care and sufficiency of plans and details for a multi-story apartment structure in Northern California.

August 2013; July 2011.

Deposition, Newport Nat’l v. Nadel-Ventana regarding the standard of care of the architect for two large commercial office buildings in Southern California. September 2010.

Trial and Deposition, Doctors Hospital v. Beazley regarding application of building codes for a hospital facility and extent of damage caused by Hurricane Ike. February 2010; September 2009.

Trial and Deposition, Voskanian Constr. v. Alhambra Unified Sch.

Dist. regarding evaluation of extra work claims presented by a general contractor for work performed at a school site and effect of plans and specifications alleged deficient. August 2009; July 2009.

Select Papers, Lectures and Publications
“2020 ICC 600 Standard for Residential Construction in High Wind Regions,” code cycle update as Consensus Committee Member (Code Standard). January 2020 (co-author)
“Slaying the Monster - Earthquake Response: A Strategic Blueprint,” Presented to Property Insurance Claims Group (PICG) in London, UK. May 2015 (presenter)
“Substance and Subjectivity: Building Codes in America,” Presented to FM Global Insurance, Western U.S. Regional meetings. May 2014 (presenter)
“Building Codes and Property Loss Claims - Substance and Subjectivity: Building Codes in America,” Presented to London Market Insurers, London, UK. September 2013 (presenter) “Building Codes and residential Claims – Code Triggers for residential Claims,” Presented to AIG Private Client Group, San Diego, CA. February 2012 (presenter)
“Building Code Requirements for Repairs Post Catastrophe,” Worley Catastrophe Response Expo, Baton Rouge, LA, February 2008 (presenter)
“Career Choices in Forensic Engineering,” Iranian American Society of Civil Engineers, January 2008 (presenter)
“Building Issues and Decay,” Keystone Pacific, 2006 (presenter) “Architectural Reviews,” CAI Member Course, 2005 (presenter) “Mold Remediation Issues and Buildings,” Orange County
Community Associations Institute, 2004 (panel speaker)

CONTACT
Bruce K. Arita
707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 4450
Los Angeles, CA 90017
213.330.7000
[email protected]
www.ThorntonTomasetti.com
BRUCE K. ARITA, AIA
SEPTEMBER 2022 2
Packet Pg. 586 15
Project Design Description
Phase 1: - Initial Hazardous Materials Survey Report and Pre-Demolition Engineering:
• Hazardous Materials Report:
o Prepare asbestos and lead based paint survey report to evaluate presence and extent of contaminations and to provide removal measures required for demolition.
• Engineering:
o Prepare an engineered demolition plan, including preliminary schematic drawings:
 Pre-demolition evaluation of Carousel Mall and adjacent buildings. • Evaluation of structural integrity and/or separations required prior to demolition of mall building structure.
• Perform structural integrity calculations of interior slabs in order to perform any interior demolition or abatement by machine on elevated slabs.
• Evaluation and engineering of any demolition work adjacent to retaining walls and basements. o Determine extent of vibration monitoring and mitigation steps required during demolition. o Determine any required post demolition inspection efforts of Harris, Enterprise, and Parking Structure.

Phase 2: - Make Ready:
• Permits and Notifications:
o Submit a Rule 1403 Notification of Procedure 1, 3 and 5 Asbestos Removal to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) at least 14 calendar days prior to start of asbestos removal. o Submit a Rule 1403 Notification of Routine Demolition to SCAQMD at least 14 calendar days prior to start of structural demolition.
o Submit a Title 8 CCR Section 5203 Temporary Worksite Notification (Report of Regulated Carcinogen Use including Asbestos-Related Work) to Cal/OSHA.
o Submit Demolition Permit application, plans and supporting documents to City of San Bernardino for plan check review and approval to issue permit for the demolition of the buildings. • Utilities Disconnection and Safe-off:
o Mark on the ground around the perimeter of the limits of work with white marking paint. o Contact 811 USA Dig Alert. Obtain Dig Alert number and list of existing utility service providers and contact information.
o Contact utility service providers for coordination and scheduling of utility cut and caps required including but not limited to, Power, Gas, Water and Telecommunications.
o Scan the pavement onsite using ground-penetrating radar equipment and mark existing locations of underground utilities onsite. Pothole and expose existing underground utilities as needed. As needed, isolate and safe-off power, gas, and water within the building for asbestos abatement and interior demolition work. Designated Safety Personnel and Demolition Foreman will visually confirm that all utilities are either disconnected or shut off with proper lock-out/tag-out protocols that meet or exceed CAL-OSHA standards. • Site Preparation:
o Apply for temporary hydrant meter and set lock on meter for on-site water source during abatement, demolition, and rough grading activities. AMPCO will request for the temporary meter to be set on one of the many hydrants existing on site at the mall parking lot nearest the work areas. Meter location subject to move as required as AMPCO progresses through the scope across the site.
o Install temporary construction fence with wind screen around perimeter of the site for site security. Construction fence shall consist of two stabilized construction entrances with double swing gates and coded padlocks with the option for the city and security guard company to have their own locks attached for access. o Install jobsite office container/trailer, storage container(s), roll-off trash bin, temporary toilets and sinks at laydown area.
o Install jobsite signage throughout the site.
o Provide engineered SWPPP with Erosion Control Plan.
o Install erosion control best management practices (BMPs) throughout site.

Phase 3: - Abatement & Interior Demolition:

Packet Pg. 587 16
• Document Control:
o Designated Safety Personnel, Abatement Quality Control and Abatement Foreman will review all hazardous materials survey reports in order to confirm and layout all locations and quantities of hazardous materials that will be abated.
o Hazardous Materials Survey Reports will be kept, maintained onsite, and made available for review upon request, as required by SCAQMD.
• Universal Waste:
o Remove, by hand using hand tools, working from aerial lifts and/or ladders, and dispose of universal waste including but not limited to fluorescent light tubes, PCB-containing light ballasts, exit signs, mercury switches, and cleaning solutions/paints/oils/other chemicals left behind by tenant. o Remove freon refrigerant from rooftop air conditioning units, interior water fountains and air conditioning units, using vendor such as Rapid Recovery, Inc.
• Interior Demolition of any areas not impacted by Hazardous Materials:
o Prior to interior demolition commencement, set up critical barriers. o A 3-stage decontamination unit will be placed at the entry/exit of demolition area. o Negative air pressure machines will be deployed in the work areas. o These precautions are in case of accidental ACM disturbance. This is not to be expected but to be set in case of disturbance.
o Using skid steer loaders and hand-wrecking methods, demolish interior partition walls completely and process the mixed C&D debris.
 Recyclable scrap metal materials will be source-separated and loaded out separately.  All diesel-powered equipment will be Tier 4 and have appropriate air scrubbers installed.  While equipment is utilized in the interior of the building, crew members will wear CO2 personal air monitors. If at any time levels of CO2 become too high, the work will be stopped in order to address ventilation and determine how best to proceed safely.
o All debris will be loaded out into high side end dump trucks and hauled to the appropriate disposal or recycling facilities.
• Asbestos Abatement Work Area Preparation:
o Prior to starting asbestos abatement tasks in any given interior area, set up the regulated work area with full negative pressure enclosure consisting of:
 All critical barriers openings to the regulated work area such as doors, windows, and louvers will be inspected and updated as needed, since these were set in place before the interior demolition phase of work.
 All stationary objects, surfaces, and walls not intended for removal or stripping of ACM shall be covered and sealed with 6-mil poly sheeting and sealed with duct tape.  All entrances will be barricaded from the work area. This includes all doors, windows, and any other openings leading to the work area. “Danger” signs shall be posted in and around the work area to comply with OSHA Regulations. Signs will follow OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(4).  Transparent view ports will be installed to allow outside observation of all stripping and removal of ACM by designated Environmental Consultant responsible for the monitoring of work.  A 3-stage decontamination unit placed at the entry/exit of the abatement area consisting of a Clean Room, Shower Room, and equipment Room. Workers will use this to enter and exit the abatement area.

During exit of the regulated work area, workers will use this to decontaminate themselves following decontamination procedures detailed in OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101(j)(1)(iii).  Negative air machine units (1500-2000 CFM) with HEPA filters will be installed and maintained to allow for at least 4 air exchanges per hour, exhausting to the outside of the buildings. All exhaust ducting locations will be sealed in like manner. At the beginning of each shift before work starts, the negative pressure enclosure shall be inspected for breaches or leaks and sealed if found.  A manometer will be installed outside of the 3-stage decontamination unit, to monitor the interior negative air pressure, and ensure it is at least -0.20” of water column. Adequate negative air pressure shall be maintained continuously from the commencement of the removal activities through the final air clearance and confirmed by Certified Asbestos Consultant and/or Industrial Hygienist. • Asbestos Abatement:
o Use wet removal methods throughout all abatement work.

Packet Pg. 588 17
As a pre-cleaning activity, all bulk comingled C&D and Asbestos Containing Materials shall be gathered by skid steer and disposed of as friable asbestos waste.
o Abate the fireproofing by hand using hand tools, working from aerial lifts and/or scaffold units. o Abate the floor tile using hand tools such as heavy-duty wrecking bars or scrapers with 2”, 4” and 8” wide blades.

For large wide-open areas, use ride-on floor scrapers (aka Terminators) to abate floor tile. o Abate the floor mastic using bead blasting methods for large areas and floor buffers for smaller areas with appropriate attachments.
 The bead blasting machine is self-contained and uses an abrasive method to remove mastic and vacuums material through filter and into bag. Material is then properly bagged and placed in friable asbestos dumpster for disposal.
 For floor buffers, mastic remover product will be poured onto the floor surface, the floor buffer will then work from one end of the room to the other until complete. Corners where the floor buffer cannot reach will be abated by hand tools such as, 2”/4” wide hand scrapers and wire brushes. o Abate any pipe gaskets throughout the building by removing intact, by hand, and placing in poly bags. o Abate any fire doors throughout the building by removing intact, by hand, wrapping in 2-layers of poly sheeting and placing into the disposal bin.
o Load out asbestos debris into friable asbestos bins that will be staged inside the containment on the 1st and 2nd floor, lined with 2-layers of clear 6-mil poly or a “bladder bag.” o Construct a load out area for the friable asbestos bins to exit the containment. The bins will be cleaned, wet wiped, free of dust and debris and the burrito bag will be sealed leak tight and properly labeled according to OSHA 1910.1001(j)(5) and South Coast AQMD rule 1403 before exiting the containment. Use a skid steer loader to move the asbestos bins in and out from the building.
o Outside of containment, abate the roof penetration mastic materials using hand tools, such as scrapers, pry bars and/or roofing hammers. All material will be double-bagged and loaded into the asbestos bin. o Obtain a Final Visual and Air Clearance from a Certified Asbestos Consultant. o Any lead waste shall be abated as required upon discovery, included but not limited to loose and flakey paint stabilization and/or ceramic tiles/fixtures.
• Hazardous Waste Disposal
o AMPCO shall facilitate the taking of samples as required to obtain a proper waste stream profile designation of all materials leaving the site including any non-regulated C&D. Any waste samples requiring OWNER approval shall be submitted to the designated parties for signature along with all analytical data and draft waste profile/manifests. o Upon receipt of the waste acceptance from the landfill, a waste manifest will be created for waste transportation and disposal and the transportation will be scheduled.
o A waste manifest will need to be signed by the OWNER, prior to or at the time of the waste pick-up, transportation, and final landfill disposition. An active EPA ID# will be to be provided to AMPCO by OWNER, and OWNER is responsible for paying any taxes associated with the waste reported against the EPA ID # in accordance with regulations.
o Non-friable and Friable asbestos waste would be disposed of at Azusa Land Reclamation Co., Inc., 1211 W.

Gladstone Street, Azusa, CA 91702.
o RCRA solid lead waste, if occurs, would be disposed of at US Ecology Nevada, Inc., PO Box 578, Beatty, NV 89003. o Non-RCRA solid waste, if occurs, would be disposed of at one of the following;  Waste Management Kettleman Hills, 35251 Old Skyline Road, Kettleman City, CA 93239  South Yuma County Landfill, 19536 S. Ave. E, Yuma, AZ, 85366  US Ecology Nevada, Inc.
o Universal Waste Fluorescent light tubes would be disposed of at Mercury Disposal Systems, 14761 Franklin Avenue, Suite F, Tustin, CA 92780 or equivalent licensed facility. o Universal Waste E-waste would be disposed of at Alltech Electronics, 1300 E. Edinger, Santa Ana, CA 92705 or equivalent licensed facility.
o Universal waste corrosive liquids would be disposed of at US Ecology Nevada, Inc. o Universal waste paint-related materials would be disposed of at Pacific Resource Recovery, 3150 E. Pico Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90023 or equivalent licensed facility.

Phase 4: - Above Grade Demolition:
• Dust Control:

Packet Pg. 589 18
o AMPCO will obtain water for dust control from the nearest temporary hydrant meter location. Temporary hydrant Flow Meter to be provided by AMPCO.
o During structural demolition work, AMPCO will use laborers with fire hoses and spray nozzles to adequately spray and wet the immediate demolition areas, debris stockpiles and the equipment paths-of-travel. 2,000-gallon water trucks will also be used to adequately wet the site and demolition work areas. Water misting turbine fan (aka “Dust Boss”) will also be placed around the site in strategic locations and remotely adjusted by Operator to blow towards demolition work areas.
o During any debris load-out work, AMPCO will use laborers with fire hoses and spray nozzles to adequately wet the debris stockpile being loaded out and the end dump of the truck being loaded up. o Monitoring of upcoming weather events and evaluate impact on existing dust control measures. • Corrective Action Plan – Dust & Debris Control Measures o In the event fugitive dust is observed migrating outside the perimeter construction area, whether due to high windy conditions or inadequate dust control measures, all work will be immediately stopped to enact the Corrective Action Plan.
 Stop dust-generating activity until problem is corrected.  Notify the Site Superintendent of dust conditions and implement dust suppression procedures.  Remove accumulated debris from problematic areas, and/or cover, enclose or isolate dust generating areas/surfaces to shield them from dust-causing sources.  Increase frequency, volume, and/or coverage of watering to prevent debris/dust from drying.  Provide additional dust suppression systems and operating personnel during the demolition task duration.  Modify operating procedures and methods to eliminate problematic conditions.  Increase level of worker awareness and instruct them on implementation of any new or modified operation procedures.
 Report and document all procedural modifications and results.  Perform routine inspections of dust suppression methods and work areas for fugitive dust sources. • Building Structures
o As a precaution and due to preexisting site conditions and issues with vacant occupation of space, AMPCO will facilitate a walk through with all required parties such as security guard firm, police department, Designated safety personnel, Owner’s rep, and all other required parties on a daily basis to ensure that there are no people within the controlled access zone/demolition area.
o Set-up controlled access zone with delineators and red danger tape around the equipment demolition work area.

Move the controlled access zone around the site as the demolition work progresses. o Separate the bridges from the building structure using saw cutting, breaking and removal of the concrete where the structures attach to the portions of Carousel Mall that are to be demolished. o Demolish the free-standing bridge structures after separation using an Excavator. This work will occur concurrently with the abatement and interior demolition work.
o After Engineering analysis is completed and approved, AMPCO shall perform a separation of Carousel Mall building and Harris and Enterprise buildings. Demolition crews will be working from lifts from the interior and exterior with hand tools, as well as using small heavy equipment working on the interior slabs and decks to sawcut, break, and remove concrete. AMPCO will remove enough non-load bearing construction material to create an air gap between the structures in order to complete the remaining demolition by excavator without affecting the Harris and Enterprise Building. Prior to any separation, an adequate barricade constructed of plywood and framing shall be installed at any openings connecting the Carousel Mall to either the Harris or Enterprise Buildings to ensure that there is no fall hazard to the public after building separation. o The interior demolition of the building floors will already have been performed during the abatement phase of work. 90-95% of the interior materials will be removed to leave the concrete shell and structure for heavy equipment demolition.
o Demolish the building, using High Reach (HR) Excavator with rotating pulverizer attachment and other support Excavators.
 The Excavator will start at the roof line where the vertical wall meets and pulverize/break into the building to create an opening and start point for demolition of building.  The Excavator will demolish the concrete walls and decks, floor-by-floor top-to-bottom in a grid line-bygrid line pattern (bay by bay).

Packet Pg. 590 19
• The Roof concrete deck and steel beams will be demolished and dropped onto the 2nd floor slab below, then the debris cleared from the slab. Then the 2nd floor deck and steel beams will be demolished and lowered onto the ground floor slab below using excavator thumb and bucket.

The debris will then be cleared from the slab. This process will repeat until the building structure demo is complete.
 Support equipment including but not limited to, Excavators of various sizes and skid steer loaders will be used to assist the HR Excavator to avoid any unnecessary collapse of floors/decks and by clearing debris from the immediate work area, separating, processing, and loading out debris.  Laborers with torch cutting equipment, working from aerial boom lifts, will be used to assist the HR Excavator in cutting steel beams and/or columns if necessary. AMPCO will provide a Job Hazard Analysis prior to this work task commencing. Adequate fire watch will be implemented along with any “Hot Work”.

All “Hot Work” activities shall be halted two hours prior to the end of shift to ensure adequate time for cool off period and fire watch walk through.
o Process the concrete debris to prepare it for load out and separate the recyclable scrap metal using Excavators with breakers and/or pulverizer attachments. This task will occur throughout the building demolition operation once enough concrete debris is accumulated.
o Load out concrete and scrap metal debris into end dumps using Excavators with bucket/thumb attachment and hauled to recycling facilities for 100% recycling/diversion. o AMPCO will deploy a Street Sweeper during load-out and trucking operations, to mitigate track out and maintain compliance with the SWPPP.

Phase 5: - Below-Grade Excavation & Demolition:
• Building Slab
o Demolish and remove the building concrete slab using a Track Loader and/or Excavator with breaker and bucket/thumb attachments, following the same building sequence as the building structural demolition.  The Track Loader or Excavator will access the slab edge and pull it up, or pop it up, breaking the slab in sections.
 Excavators with pulverizer or breaker attachments will process the concrete to separate scrap metal and load the debris into end dump trucks to be hauled offsite for recycling. o Demolish the portion of the slab that covers the Lower Level using an Excavator with breaker attachment, letting the concrete debris fall to the Slab on Grade below. Concrete debris will be removed to expose the Slab on Grade. o Demolish the Slab on Grade the same way as steps above. • Building Continuous & Spread Footings
o Excavate and remove the continuous wall footings and column spread footings using Excavators with bucket/thumb, breaker and pulverizer attachments, following the same sequence as the building slab demolition. o The Excavator will excavate the dirt next to and around the footings to expose the side of the footing. o If the footing is manageable, the Excavator will pull the footing out of the dirt and place it in a stockpile where it will be processed by an Excavator with breaker and/or pulverizer attachments. o If the footing size is too large to pull out of the dirt, the Excavator with breaker attachment will break and process the footing in the trench, then the Excavator with bucket/thumb attachment will remove the concrete debris from the trench for further processing.
o After the footing is removed from the dirt, Excavator will push the dirt back into the hole or trench, slope, level, and compact as needed to make the area safe.
o Excavators with pulverizer or breaker attachments will process the concrete to separate scrap metal and load the debris into end dump trucks to be hauled offsite for recycling. • Excavate and remove any Retaining walls and footings and column spread footings using Excavators with bucket/thumb, breaker and pulverizer attachments.
• Removal of Waste Material
• Concrete debris will be removed from the site via low-side end dump trucks and transported to a recycling facility for 100% recycling/diversion.
• Scrap metal debris will be removed from the site via high-side end dump trucks and transported to a recycling facility for 100% recycling/diversion.
• AMPCO will deploy a Street Sweeper during load-out and trucking operations, to mitigate track out and maintain compliance with the SWPPP.

Packet Pg. 591 20
Phase 6: - Site Improvements:
• Demolish and remove concrete and asphalt paving, curbs and gutters using Excavators with bucket/thumb, breaker and/or pulverizer attachments as necessary to accommodate a 40’ easement/boundary around the perimeter of the Carousel Mall and on-site Structures to demolish walls, footings, and foundations. • Excavate and remove underground utilities within the building footprints using Excavator with bucket/thumb attachment. • Cap sewer lateral(s) at the property line. Record as-built location and depth. • Grade and compact soil on site as needed for backfill and grading of voids created from removal of Basements, building foundations and underground utilities.
• Final grading to provide site drainage per the requirements of the SWPPP to provide drainage towards the “pit” left behind from demolition since no material is to be left on site or imported from outside of the jobsite.

Packet Pg. 592 21
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 CONTRACT SCHEDULE (310 Working Days) 310 days Mon 11/14/22 Tue 2/6/24 2 OVERALL SCHEDULE 310 days Mon 11/14/22 Tue 2/6/24
3 Notice to Proceed 1 day Mon 11/14/22 Mon 11/14/22
4 Phase 1- Intial Asbestos & Lead Survey/Pre-Demo
Engineering
27 days Mon 11/14/22 Thu 12/22/22
5 Hazardous Material Report 15 days Mon 11/14/22 Tue 12/6/22 6 Sample Materials 13 days Mon 11/14/22 Fri 12/2/22
7 Compile Hazardous Materials Survey 2 days Mon 12/5/22 Tue 12/6/22 8 Engineering 27 days Mon 11/14/22 Thu 12/22/22
9 Structural Integrity Evaluation 5 days Mon 11/14/22 Fri 11/18/22 10 GPR Scan Decks 5 days Mon 11/21/22 Tue 11/29/22
11 Exploritory Demo 5 days Wed 11/30/22 Tue 12/6/22
12 Interior Deck Calculations 2 days Wed 12/7/22 Thu 12/8/22 13 Final Engineered Demo Plan 10 days Fri 12/9/22 Thu 12/22/22 14 PHASE 2 - Make Ready 165 days Mon 5/16/22 Wed 1/11/23 15 Permits 30 days Tue 11/15/22 Thu 12/29/22
16 Asbestos & Demolition Notifications - SCAQMD,
Cal/OSHA
10 days Wed 12/7/22 Tue 12/20/22
17 Division 5 Asbestos Permit - SCAQMD 10 days Wed 12/7/22 Tue 12/20/22 18 Demolition Permit - (City of San Bernardino) 30 days Tue 11/15/22 Thu 12/29/22 19 Sewer Cap Permit - (City of San Bernardino) 1 day Thu 12/29/22 Thu 12/29/22 20 Utilities Disconnection and Safe-off 81 days Mon 11/14/22 Mon 3/13/23 21 Mark for and contact USA Dig Alert 1 day Mon 11/14/22 Mon 11/14/22 22 Power (SCE) 81 days Tue 11/15/22 Tue 3/14/23
23 Gas (SCG) 81 days Tue 11/15/22 Tue 3/14/23
24 Water (SBMWB) 81 days Tue 11/15/22 Tue 3/14/23
25 Fire Water (SBMWB) 81 days Tue 11/15/22 Tue 3/14/23
26 Telecom (Various) 52 days Tue 11/15/22 Wed 2/1/23
27 Site Preparation & General Conditions 260 days Mon 11/14/22 Mon 11/27/23 28 Project Management 260 days Mon 11/14/22 Mon 11/27/23 29 Water Meter & Usage 260 days Mon 11/14/22 Mon 11/27/23 30 Jobsite Trailer 260 days Mon 11/14/22 Mon 11/27/23
31 Sanitary Facilities 260 days Mon 11/14/22 Mon 11/27/23 32 Temp fence and wind screen 260 days Mon 11/14/22 Mon 11/27/23 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Qtr 2, 2022 Qtr 3, 2022 Qtr 4, 2022 Qtr 1, 2023 Qtr 2, 2023 Qtr 3, 2023 Qtr 4, 2023 Qtr 1, 2024 Critical
Critical Split
Critical Progress
Task
Split
Task Progress
Manual Task
Start-only
Finish-only
Duration-only
Baseline
Baseline Split
Baseline Milestone
Milestone
Summary Progress
Summary
Manual Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Deadline
Carousel Mall Project
Job #21-632PW
Project Schedule
9/27/2022

Page 1 ends

22 Packet Pg. 593
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
33 Site security 260 days Mon 11/14/22 Mon 11/27/23
34 SWPPP 171 days Mon 11/14/22 Wed 7/19/23
35 Obtain engineered SWPPP and Erosion Control Plan 15 days Mon 11/14/22 Tue 12/6/22 36 Install perimeter BMPs 31 days Wed 12/7/22 Mon 1/23/23 37 Maintain BMPs onsite 214 days Tue 1/24/23 Mon 11/27/23 38 Weekly QSP Inspections 214 days Tue 1/24/23 Mon 11/27/23 39 PHASE 3 - Abatement & Interior Demolition 260 days Mon 11/14/22 Mon 11/27/23 40 Interior Demolition (Procedure 5) 74 days Tue 12/13/22 Wed 3/29/23 41 Mobilization - Demolition 1 day Tue 12/20/22 Tue 12/20/22 42 Set Up Containment 10 days Wed 12/21/22 Thu 1/5/23
43 Interior demo 50 days Fri 1/6/23 Fri 3/17/23
44 Load-out C&D debris 50 days Wed 1/11/23 Mon 5/1/23
45 Remove recyclable scrap metal debris 43 days Fri 12/30/22 Thu 3/2/23 46 Load-out scrap metal debris 1 day Fri 3/3/23 Wed 3/29/23 47 Abatement 172 days Thu 12/29/22 Thu 8/31/23
48 Mobilization - Abatement 1 day Mon 2/6/23 Mon 2/6/23 49 Freon removal 5 days Mon 2/6/23 Fri 2/10/23
50 Universal waste (light tubes, ballasts, etc.) 46 days Thu 12/29/22 Mon 3/6/23 51 Set-up critical barriers & 3-stage decon unit 3 days Mon 2/6/23 Wed 2/8/23 52 Prep full containments 12 days Mon 2/6/23 Tue 2/21/23 53 Fireproofing Removal 120 days Wed 2/22/23 Thu 8/10/23 54 Floor tile removal by terminator 60 days Wed 3/15/23 Wed 6/7/23 55 Pipe gaskets 30 days Wed 3/1/23 Tue 4/11/23
56 Fire doors 10 days Wed 4/12/23 Tue 4/25/23
57 Roof penetration mastic 10 days Fri 8/11/23 Thu 8/24/23 58 Visual clearance by CAC 30 days Fri 7/14/23 Thu 8/24/23 59 Final clearance by CAC 5 days Fri 8/25/23 Thu 8/31/23 60 PHASE 4 - Above-grade Demolition 70 days Tue 6/6/23 Wed 9/13/23 61 Set up dust controls around the site 2 days Fri 8/4/23 Mon 8/7/23 62 Separate upper parking structure bridge from
building structure
15 days Tue 8/8/23 Mon 8/28/23
63 Above Grade Demolition 60 days Tue 8/8/23 Tue 10/31/23 64 Process concrete debris 22 days Wed 10/11/23 Thu 11/9/23 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Qtr 2, 2022 Qtr 3, 2022 Qtr 4, 2022 Qtr 1, 2023 Qtr 2, 2023 Qtr 3, 2023 Qtr 4, 2023 Qtr 1, 2024 Critical
Critical Split
Critical Progress
Task
Split
Task Progress
Manual Task
Start-only
Finish-only
Duration-only
Baseline
Baseline Split
Baseline Milestone
Milestone
Summary Progress
Summary
Manual Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Deadline
Carousel Mall Project
Job #21-632PW
Project Schedule
9/27/2022

Page 2 ends

23 Packet Pg. 594
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
65 Load-out concrete debris 5 days Mon 11/6/23 Mon 11/13/23 66 PHASE 5 - Below-grade Demolition 49 days Mon 11/6/23 Wed 1/17/24 67 Demo building slab 15 days Mon 11/6/23 Wed 11/29/23
68 Demo building footings 30 days Mon 11/27/23 Mon 1/8/24 69 Excavate and remove Basement slab, walls and footings 10 days Tue 1/2/24 Mon 1/15/24 70 Process concrete debris 25 days Mon 12/11/23 Mon 1/15/24 71 Load-out concrete debris 15 days Thu 12/28/23 Wed 1/17/24 72 PHASE 6 - Site Improvements & Offsite Restoration 63 days Mon 11/6/23 Tue 2/6/24 73 Site Demolition 54 days Mon 11/6/23 Wed 1/24/24
74 Demo concrete paving 1 day Mon 11/6/23 Mon 11/6/23
75 Demo asphalt paving 2 days Tue 11/7/23 Wed 11/8/23
76 Demo curb and gutter 1 day Mon 11/6/23 Mon 11/6/23
77 Demo site walls and footings 4 days Tue 11/7/23 Mon 11/13/23 78 Excavate and remove underground utilities 10 days Tue 1/9/24 Mon 1/22/24 79 Cap sewer lateral(s) 1 day Tue 1/23/24 Tue 1/23/24
80 Process concrete debris 1 day Tue 1/23/24 Tue 1/23/24 81 Load-out concrete debris 1 day Wed 1/24/24 Wed 1/24/24 82 Load-out asphalt debris 1 day Wed 1/24/24 Wed 1/24/24 83 Load-out utility debris 1 day Wed 1/24/24 Wed 1/24/24 84 Load-out scrap metal debris 7 days Mon 1/15/24 Tue 1/23/24 85 Earthwork / Grading 9 days Thu 1/25/24 Tue 2/6/24
86 Mobilization 1 day Thu 1/25/24 Thu 1/25/24
87 Fine grade site to provide site drainage 7 days Fri 1/26/24 Mon 2/5/24 88 Final inspection by (City of San Bernardino) 1 day Tue 2/6/24 Tue 2/6/24 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Qtr 2, 2022 Qtr 3, 2022 Qtr 4, 2022 Qtr 1, 2023 Qtr 2, 2023 Qtr 3, 2023 Qtr 4, 2023 Qtr 1, 2024 Critical
Critical Split
Critical Progress
Task
Split
Task Progress
Manual Task
Start-only
Finish-only
Duration-only
Baseline
Baseline Split
Baseline Milestone
Milestone
Summary Progress
Summary
Manual Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Deadline
Carousel Mall Project
Job #21-632PW
Project Schedule
9/27/2022

Page 3 ends

24 Packet Pg. 595
Summary of Value-Added Enhancements (Add Alternates)
The following services are not included in the base scope of services of this Agreement and are not included in the above fees. If authorized by Client, AMPCO will perform the following additional services at a fee to be agreed upon.

1. Design of any temporary shoring required during the demolition activities.

2. Design of any closures to adjacent buildings or connecting bridges.

3. Design of demolition procedures for any connecting bridges to adjoining buildings, or design of shoring and structural support for these bridges.

4. Provide load testing specification as required to verify capacity of the existing floor slabs and framing. This work can include the design, supervision of the work, and incorporation of the results of the testing plan into the demolition drawings.

5. Analysis and design of any required retaining wall temporary bracing at the below grade levels after removal of the first-floor framing.

6. Preparation of weekly field reports summarizing the progress of work and documenting site observations, conversations, and field conditions.

7. Development, installation, and implementation of a detailed monitoring plan for adjacent buildings to remain (Harris Building, Enterprise Building and Parking Structure) during demolition, including a description of the instrumentation, location on structure, alert, alarm levels along with a response plan for each level.

8. 3D monitoring during the demolition process; 3D rendering showing demolition sequence.

9. LEED or SUSTAINABILITY services and/or material tracking either during the design or dismantle effort.

10. Professional consulting services relative to work which is outside the proposed scope of our work required for this project proposal.

11. Services required due to project changes including, but not limited to, changes in the following:
scope, design, size, complexity, Owner's schedule, or the character of construction.

12. Revisions for work which has already been completed and approved.

13. Services required to consult with a peer review engineer, should Owner elect to have AMPCO’s services peer reviewed.

14. Review of loads imposed on existing foundations for impact generated by cranes.

15. Review of comments to our structural design by a third-party engineer and preparation of responses to any comments made by the third party engineer.

Packet Pg. 596 25
PROJECT: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: BY: DATE:

SSK-001
General Demolition Sequence:(1) Demolish Montgomery Ward's Auto(2) Demolish JC Penny Auto(3) Separate bridges connecting to structure to be demolished.(4) Demolish Montgomery Ward's(5) Demolish JC Penny(6) Demolish Carousel Mall(7) Demolish section of Carousel Mall adjacent to Harris Building and EnterpriseBuildingNotes:a. Parking Structure, Enterprise and Harris Building and bridges are out of scopeb. Barricades will be constructed at all openings connecting the structures toremain with the structures to be demolished.c. Refer to "Project Design Description" for more detailed information (1) Montgomery Ward's Auto (2) JC Penny Auto (4) Montgomery Ward's (3) Separate bridge from structure to be demolished (3) Separate bridge from structure to be demolished (3) Separate bridge from structure to be demolished (5) JC Penny (6) Carousel Mall 22 23 24
Selective handdemolition beyondGLs 22
(7) One bay to remain to serve asisolation point while the potentialimpact to Harris Building andEnterprise Building is assessed Parking structureand connectingbridges to remain
Enterprisebldg toremain
Harris bldg toremain
Pedestrianbridge toremain Out of scope
Demolition Demolition Demolition Gridlines, Typ
(1) Montgomery Ward's Auto, and (2) JC Penny Auto- Demolish the building using High-Reach (HR) Excavator with rotating pulverizer, starting at theroof-to-wall junction- Create one opening and continue demolishing the walls and roof in a gridline-by-gridline patternuntil reaching the wall on opposite side.- Continue until Montgomery Ward's demolition is complete- Repeat until JC Penny Auto is complete.(3) Bridges (to remain):- Perform explorations to determine the characteristics of the connection between the bridgesand structure to be demolished- Separate bridges using saw cutting, breaking and removal of concrete. (4) Montgomery Ward's, (5) JC Penny, and (6) Carousel Mall:- Demolish the building using High-Reach (HR) Excavator with rotating pulverizer, starting at theroof-to-wall junction- Create one opening and continue demolishing the walls, decks and roof, and steel framingfloor-by-floor, top-to-bottom, in a gridline-by-gridline pattern.- Continue until Montgomery Ward's is complete- Repeat until JC Penny is complete- Repeat until the Carousel Mall is complete(7) Carousel Mall adjacent to the Harris and Enterprise Buildings (to remain):- Stop two structural bays in with the excavator and move onto selective hand wrecking- Leave behind one bay in which to frame out to serve as an isolation point while the HarrisBuilding impact is explored further.

Demolition
Excavate and slope soil behindretaining wall prior to demolishingthe 2nd floor deck (Typ.) Gridlines, Typ

SCHEMATIC DEMOLITION SEQUENCE
CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401 AC 9/28/2022    
 Packet Pg. 597
Project Scope: AMPCO was hired as a prime contractor to demolish the existing Palomar Hospital. Scope included
removal of asbestos containing materials, lead, PCB’s,
Universal waste, full building demolition, foundation
demolition, crushing, backfill, and mass grading. The total building square footage was 1,100,000 SF. Buildings
consisting of a main 6 story parking structure (3 levels below grade), a 7-story tower, multiple auxiliary buildings and a 13-story building tower. Project was fully abated and
demolished within a 7-month period.

Means and Methods: AMPCO Self performed all activities
on site. AMPCO utilized our fleet of high reach machines and standard machines to accomplish our goals along with a ball and crane from time to time. Each section of the building was removed floor by floor utilizing the latest and safest demolition techniques while utilizing our company owned state of the art equipment.

Challenges Faced: This project was one of the largest
demolition projects San Diego County had seen for years.

The existing facility was in the middle of a residential neighborhood and was high profile in nature. Tall
structures, dust control and debris management were some of the key components to manage daily and for the ultimate success of the project

PALOMAR HOSPITAL
Demolition & Abatement
555 EAST VALLEY PARKWAY

ESCONDIDO, CA

PERFORMANCE PERIOD SEPT
JULY 2021 - MARCH 2022
Contract Value: $6,307,744
CLIENT
Integral Communities

REFERENCE
Ninia Hammond (949) 720-3612
27 Packet Pg. 598
Project Scope: AMPCO performed all hazardous material
abatement and interior demolition within the structures to prepare for the structural demolition. AMPCO provided
dust barriers, walkway canopies, vibrations monitoring
and SWPPP.

AMPCO worked directly with Sares Regis and their
project consultants to assist and overcome many
necessary require-ments to complete the demolition
while not disturbing the surrounding Boeing buildings and office sites.

Means and Methods: AMPCO self performed all necessary
environmental and structural demolition utilizing our high reach excavator and support equipment to safely
demolish the structure. AMPCO also installed water
turbines that were used to suppress the dust during the demolition activities
Challenges Faced: Throughout the project AMPCO was
able to maintain low vibration and sound requirements
necessary to not disturb the scientific laboratories in adjacent buildings which were operating at 100%.

BOEING PHASE II
Abatement & Demolition
14900 BOLSA CHICA

HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA

PERFORMANCE PERIOD
MAY 2021 - DECEMBER 2021
Contract Value: $6,200,000

C L I E N T
Sares Regis

R E F E R E N C E
Bob Klaewtanong 949.463.3264
28 Packet Pg. 599
Project Scope:

AMPCO was hired as a subcontractor for the demolition of three (3) county offices buildings scheduled for demolition at the County of Orange’s campus and grading of the site to prepare it for construction of a new county office building.

AMPCO performed the hazardous materials abatement which included asbestos, lead and PCB-containing materials from the interior and exterior of the buildings. The interior offices were gutted out from the buildings to prepare them for structural demolition. AMPCO deployed water misting fans and water trucks for dust control.

AMPCO worked directly with Swinerton Builders and their project consultants to navigate through the project, to complete the work ahead of schedule, while working alongside occupied buildings with public officials.

Means and Methods: AMPCO self-performed the demolition
and earthwork scopes of work, and subcontracted the
hazardous materials abatement to a few subcontractors. The demolition was performed using a High-Reach Excavator with support equipment to safely demolish the structure
Challenges Faced: Throughout the project, AMPCO was able to maintain good dust control and compliance with
environmental rules and regulations, without disturbing the County’s occupied buildings operations. Over a thousand loads of debris were hauled off of this jobsite. AMPCO was able to maintain good traffic control with no accidents or incidents to the public right-of-way.

COUNTY BUILDING
14 DEMOLITION
Abatement & Demolition
645 N ROSS STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92701

PERFORMANCE PERIOD
NOVEMBER 2019 - MARCH 2020
Contract Value: $4,679,662
CLIENT
Swinerton Builders

REFERENCE
Michael Forys 949-622-7000
Packet Pg. 600 29

COURTESY XXXX IMAGE CREDIT TO COME

COURTESY XXXX IMAGE CREDIT TO COME COURTESY XXXX IMAGE CREDIT TO COME Client / Owner
The New York City Department of Design and
Construction
Completion date
2002
Services
Damage assessment, demolition assistance,
temporary stabilization procedures, survey
monitoring of damaged structures, inspection
of surrounding buildings

HIGHLIGHTS
• More than 1.6 million tons of debris
removed
• Recovery completed under budget
and four months ahead of schedule
• Safety first - no single major injury
among the recovery workers

WORLD TRADE CENTER

DISASTER RECOVERY
New York, New York
On the afternoon of September 11, senior representatives from Thornton Tomasetti conducted an initial walk-through of the World Trade Center site with city officials to survey the situation and begin planning for widespread building inspections and on-site engineering operations.

By the morning of September 12, more than 30 of the firm’s structural engineers were mobilized. Working with the New York City Department of Buildings, Thornton Tomasetti conducted inspections of more than 400 buildings in Lower Manhattan. Among the most challenging tasks were the design of grillages and the reinforcement of existing support members to allow placement of cranes, grapplers and other heavy equipment. Large cranes with long reaches and capacities of up to 1,000 tons were needed to provide access to the search and rescue areas, which were designated by the New York City Fire Department.

Though at one point more than 30 cranes were on the site, there was not a single case of a crane support problem during the entire rescue and recovery efforts.

Services we provided included immediate damage assessment of buildings in the collapse area, assistance with demolition and temporary stabilization procedures, design of grillages and analysis of existing structures to support construction equipment, coordination of the survey monitoring of existing damaged structures, and inspection of hundreds of buildings in the area surrounding the collapse site.

Packet Pg. 601 30

ONE JAMES RIVER

PLAZA DEMOLITION
Richmond, Virginia
Thornton Tomasetti provided engineering
services for the mechanical demolition,
installation of a new earth retention system and
the implosion of the 23-story OJRP building,
former headquarters of Dominion Energy.

Mechanical demolition was carried out in four phases, allowing for reinforcement of the existing foundations and installation of a new earth retention system to maintain stability of the surrounding area.

Thornton Tomasetti performed a lateral stability analysis to assess the adequacy of the superstructure to withstand
temporary wind loads after the mechanical demolition of the below-grade parking garage was completed and the preimplosion structural weakening was performed. Based on the results of these analyses, Thornton Tomasetti proposed several changes to the pre-weakening plan, which were then implemented by the contractor.

Thornton Tomasetti performed implosion analysis to predict the progression of the collapse of the 23-story OJRP building and the extent of the debris field to ensure safety of adjacent high-rise buildings from the falling debris. The mechanics of the damage and failure from the high fidelity local models of the waffle slab and the transfer girder were incorporated into the global model of the building in order to achieve reasonable computational run-times without sacrificing accuracy in the results. Thornton Tomasetti also performed a soil vibration analysis to ensure the structural integrity of the foundations of adjacent properties and buried utilities.

The project was successful due to carefully developed plans and robust and accurate implosion analyses. The mechanical demolition of the parking garage, the installation of the new earth retention system and the implosion of the building were completed without incident.

COURTESY THORNTON TOMASETTI

COURTESY THORNTON TOMASETTI
Client
DH Griffin Wrecking Company
Date completed
2020
Services
Demolition planning,
structural stability analysis,
implosion analysis and
vibration analysis
Packet Pg. 602 31
Request for Proposals September 1, 2022
Carousel Mall Demolition Project
ATTACHMENT 2

IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION
(Public Contract Code sections 2200-2208)
Prior to bidding on, submitting a proposal, or executing a contract or renewal for a public entity contract for goods or services of $1,000,000 or more, a vendor must either: a) certify it is not on the current list of persons engaged in investment activities in Iran created by the California Department of General Services ("DGS") pursuant to Public Contract Code section 2203(b) and is not a financial institution extending $20,000,000 or more in credit to another person, for 45 days or more, if that other person will use the credit to provide goods or services in the energy sector in Iran and is identified on the current list of persons engaged in investment activities in Iran created by DGS; or b) demonstrate it has been exempted from the certification requirement for that solicitation or contract pursuant to Public Contract Code section 2203(c) or (d).

To comply with this requirement, please insert your vendor or financial institution name and Federal ID Number (if available) and complete one of the options below. Please note: California law establishes penalties for providing false certifications, including civil penalties equal to the greater of $250,000 or twice the amount of the contract for which the false certification was made, contract termination, and three-year ineligibility to bid on contracts. (Pub. Cont. Code§ 2205.) OPTION #1 - CERTIFICATION
I, the official named below, certify I am duly authorized to execute this certification on behalf of the vendor/financial institution identified below, and the vendor/financial institution identified below is not on the current list of persons engaged in investment activities in Iran created by DGS and is not a financial institution extending twenty million dollars ($20,000,000) or more in credit to another person/vendor, for 45 days or more, if that other person/vendor will use the credit to provide goods or services in the energy sector in Iran and is identified on the current list of persons engaged in investment activities in Iran created by DGS.

I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
;; Vendor Name/Financial Institution (Printed) /
I Federal ID Number (or nla)
I 20-1713092 r AMPCO Contractina, Inc.
!
�1�..$✓�ature)
,
=v
=
e
=
o
=
r
=
P
=
e
=�
=
o
=
n
=s
=
,
=
g
=
n
=m
=
g
===========
1 1D
=at
=
e
=
E
=
x
=
e
=
c
=
u
=
re
=
d
========;I
l�odcew E.eooor - C.E.O .. 09/22/2022
OPTION #2 - EXEMPTION
Pursuant to Public Contract Cade sections 2203(c) and (d), a public entity may permit a vendor/financial institution engaged in investment activities in Iran, on a case-by-case basis, to be eligible for, or to bid on, submit a proposal for, or enters into or renews, a contract for goods and services.

If you have obtained an exemption from the certification requirement under the Iran Contracting Act, please fi hd . d . h . 111 out the information belaw, and attac ocumentatIon emonstrating t e exemetIon approval.

Vendor Name/Financial Institution (Printed)
By (Authorized Signature)
Printed Name and Title of Person Signing

Page 16 ends

II Federal ID Number (or nla)
IIDate Executed
32 Packet Pg. 603
33    
 Packet Pg. 604
34    
 Packet Pg. 605
Request for Proposals September 1, 2022
Carousel Mall Demolition Project
ATTACHMENT 5

PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, all contractors and subcontractors that wish to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or enter into a contract to perform public work must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. See http://www.dir.ca.gov/PublicWorks/PublicWorks.html for additional information.

No bid will be accepted nor any contract entered into without proof of the contractor's and subcontractors' current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work.

Bidder hereby certifies that it is aware of the registration requirements set forth in Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 and is currently registered as a contractor with the Department of Industrial Relations.

Name of Bidder: AMPCO Contracting, Inc.

DIR Registration Number: _10_0_0_0_1_1_75_ 9 _____ _
Bidder further acknowledges:
( 1) Bidder shall maintain a current DIR registration for the duration of the project. (2) Bidder shall include the requirements of Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 in its contract with subcontractors and ensure that all subcontractors are registered at the time of bid opening and maintain registration status for the duration of the project.

Name of Bidder AMPCO Contracting, Inc.

Signature �tt
Name and Title Andrew Pennor - CEO/President
Dated September 22, 2022

Page 19 ends

Packet Pg. 606 35
Packet Pg. 607
Packet Pg. 608
Packet Pg. 609
Packet Pg. 610
Packet Pg. 611
Packet Pg. 612
Packet Pg. 613
Packet Pg. 614
Packet Pg. 615
Packet Pg. 616
Packet Pg. 617
Packet Pg. 618
Packet Pg. 619
Packet Pg. 620
Packet Pg. 621
Packet Pg. 622
Packet Pg. 623
Packet Pg. 624
Packet Pg. 625
Packet Pg. 626
Packet Pg. 627
Packet Pg. 628
Packet Pg. 629
Packet Pg. 630
Packet Pg. 631
Packet Pg. 632
Packet Pg. 633
Packet Pg. 634
Packet Pg. 635
Packet Pg. 636
Packet Pg. 637
Packet Pg. 638
Packet Pg. 639
Packet Pg. 640
Packet Pg. 641
Packet Pg. 642
Packet Pg. 643
Packet Pg. 644
Packet Pg. 645
Packet Pg. 646
Packet Pg. 647
Packet Pg. 648
Packet Pg. 649
Packet Pg. 650
Packet Pg. 651
Packet Pg. 652
Packet Pg. 653
Packet Pg. 654
Packet Pg. 655
Packet Pg. 656
Packet Pg. 657
Packet Pg. 658
PROPOSAL BY...

AD IMPROVEMENTS, INC.
12252 WOODRUFF AVE.

DOWNEY, CA 90241
Packet Pg. 659
Transmittal Cover Letter....................................................................................................1 Executive Summary............................................................................................................2 Proposed Scope Of Services...........................................................................................3-4 Personnel (Organizational Chart)................................................................................5-10 Understanding Of The Project.........................................................................................11 Project Design Description......................................................................................11-12 Project Schedule.......................................................................................................13-15 Project Compliance With Minimum Program & Performance Requirements........16 Life Cycle Cost.................................................................................................................16 Summary Of Value-added Enhancements..................................................................17 Schematic Drawings.................................................................................................18-19 References....................................................................................................................20-21 List Of Representative Projects.......................................................................................22 Attachment 2 Iran Contracting Act Certification...........................................................23 Attachment 3 Workers’ Compensation Certification....................................................24 Attachment 4 Non-collusion Declaration.......................................................................25 Attachment 5 Public Works Contractor Registration Certification.............................26 Attachment 6 Proposal Forms (Attached in separate envelope) Electronic Proposal (Flash drive in separate envelope)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Packet Pg. 660
September 14th, 2022
To Whom it May Concern:

The design-build team of AD Improvements, Inc. and Core Structure is pleased to submit this proposal for the demolition at the Carousel Mall in the city of San Bernardino.

AD Improvements, Inc. is a small business local to San Bernardino, CA. With over 25 years of experience, we have worked alongside numerous entities such as the Department of Transportation, the Department of Defense, Los Angeles World Airport, the County of San Bernardino, and many more. Our work with these clients is not limited to demolition, we have also performed other services such as soil remediation, site preparation, and grading.

Moreover, ADI has worked in San Bernardino County for over 12 years. The most recent project being the Demolition of Old Ayala Park, in which ADI is demolishing multiple park structures, thus enhancing the community. Not to mention our history of work with San Bernardino, such as the demolition of the 2nd and 5th Streets Off-ramps, for the expansion of the 215 Freeway. We've also demolished the Fire House, tire factories, gas stations, motels, and restaurants, on 9th and H Streets. Thus, our performances within the County of San Bernardino, specifically for demolition projects, has been nothing short of extensive.

When it comes to the Demolition of the Carousel Mall Project, AD improvements, Inc. has assembled a highly experienced team of matter experts, which we have established relationships with over the course of many years. Collaborating with these subcontractors on hefty projects, such as naval bases like Miramar, CA and Camp Pendleton, has provided us the experience and capability to successfully execute this project.

To begin, Core structure is a multi-discipline structural engineering company who's head engineers visited the site alongside AD Improvements, Inc., and reviewed the RFQ in order to accurately assess the site in regards to the reinforcement and stabilization of the current structures. This ADI partner has been in business for over 75 years, and is highly respected in the construction community, thus we fully trust their ability to handle all design aspects of the Carousel Mall Demolition.

We've also partnered with Terra Environmental, Inc. to tackle the environmental assessment and survey reports. At ADI, we understand the impact of protecting the public from contaminant exposure, as well as safeguarding our employees.

For this reason, we've selected Terra Environmental, who have 25 years of experience bolstering their expertise.

Robert Acosta, President of AD Improvements, is committed to supporting all staff and subcontractors with additional help from his Project Manager, Janet Morales, as well as Superintendent, Rick Ayala. At ADI, we have a proven track record of prioritizing safety, which is why we rely on our highly trained and experienced Senior Site Safety Health Officer, Austin Trujillo. The AD Improvements Team is well seasoned with experience, and prides itself in collaborating with clients to complete projects swiftly.

To conclude, we are prepared to spearhead every facet of this project, and have designated the necessary resources to do so. Our commitment to safety, craftsmanship and quality service to all applications of demolition, has demonstrated our ability to complete our projects on-time, on-budget, and claim-free. We plan to maintain our reputation by fulfilling this project as well, to the full standards of the City of San Bernardino.

Sincerely ,
_________________________________
Robert Acosta, President/CEO

TRANSMITTAL COVER LETTER
1 Packet Pg. 661

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
AD Improvements, Inc. understands the need of San Bernardino; to efficiently and effectively remove this structure. The project proposes demolition of the existing Carousel Mall. The proposed building is a shopping center with 52 stores and 3 anchor stores. It is a two story building that encompasses approximately 1.1 million square feet. It has been unoccupied since 2017. This is in addition to the two recently added buildings, adjacent to the main structure. JcPenny is a two story building constituting approximately 42,000 sq. ft., whereas Montgomery Ward Automotive Center is about 17,778 sq. ft.

SUMMARY
The objective is perform remediation and demolition on the existing building, while protecting the buildings that will be remaining; connected and, or adjacent to the Carousel Mall. AD Improvements will carry out the project in a series of phases to complete this contract, the safest and most efficient way possible.

Through the process of combing through the environmental facets of the project, we uncovered VCT (vinyl composite tile) with asbestos, lead paint, elevators’ hydraulic, fireproofing materials on all structures, carbons, and due to the building's in-occupancy we discovered there is disturbed asbestos-containing materials. We will begin with Phase 1, in which Terra Environmental will conduct a survey of the entire property to identify asbestos, lead, contaminated soil if present, and other contaminated material findings; in order to remediate the property before demolition.

Environmental Conditions are to be considered in the design plan of this project. There are different buildings such as the Montgomery Ward Automotive Center, Planting facility, railroad spurs, dry cleaning facility, etc. Due to the propensity of the materials such as underground hydraulics lifts, clarifiers, and LUST (Leaking Underground Storage Tanks). These items can later impact the soil and cause the release of chemicals and VOCs (Volatile organic compounds) to the subsurface. AD Improvements, Inc. recommends to partner with soil engineer, A- Tech Consulting, to eliminate future impact this may have on developments to be built on this land, but also eliminate current environmental hazards to the city of San Bernardino.

Because of the historical existing conditions of the site, there are potential abandoned utility lines that need to be identified, removed, cut, and capped at the curbside. The underground locating utility company, C- Below, will perform an extensive utility locator map to identify every existing underground line that needs to be either preserved, removed and capped off.

Working on demolition aspects in which the Carousel Mall is attached to adjacent buildings, such as the bridge from the parking structure to the mall, Harris Building, Fairview Chevrolet, and the Enterprise Building, requires a high degree of caution. To preserve the integrity of the parking structure not compromising the stability of the building, AD Improvements and Core Structure created a specific plan to demolish this building without jeopardizing the structural integrity of the building.

AD Improvements has a history of identifying issues before they arise, which ensures their effective mitigation and general project adaptation. We are skilled problem solvers and experts in our field. 2 Packet Pg. 662

PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
Design-build team will obtain a comprehensive survey report, and based on the survey report, abatement phase will be performed as needed. After the abatement services have been completed, demolition phases will commence. Architectural engineering design team will determine the methods for structural stability and remaining pathways. This includes the two adjacent buildings: JcPenny is a two story building constituting approximately 42,000 sq. ft., whereas Montgomery Ward Automotive Center is about 17,778 sq. ft.

AD Improvements Inc will furnish all materials, labor, tools, equipment, apparatus, transportation, construction, clean-up, and all other construction services of any type necessary to complete all work in strict conformity with the contract documents. AD Improvements Inc will perform in accordance with the Architectural Engineering Schematic Drawing, City of San Bernardino compliance and regulations, comply with the State Labor Code, Cal/OSHA Title 8CCR1529.1 Asbestos, AQMD Rule 1403 and FED/OSHA 29 CFR1926.1101.

To coordinate the services needed, the project will be executed in Phases:

Phase I will constitute the Pre-Performance Phase: licenses, permits, survey reports, SWPPP, utilities disconnection and capping, permanent fencing installation; also site security.

Phase II will be the Abatement Performance Phase; asbestos, lead, mold, abandoned drums & chemicals, and other hazardous materials removal and disposal.

Phase III will be the Demolition Performance Phase, following structural engineers' plans; interior demolition of second floor, interior demolition of first floor, exterior demolition of second floor, exterior demolition of first floor, demolition of foundation and footing’s along with disposal and transportation.

Phase IV will be the Performance Finalized Phase; stability, soil stabilization, grading, clean up, lab testing, geotechnical plan and remediation.

Scope of Services:

Architectural and engineering design services are to take place in accordance with the demolition methods and for the adjacent structures to remain, being the Harris building, Enterprise Building, walkways connecting and parking structure.

As a local business AD Improvements Inc. would obtain the necessary demolition permits and any related permits with the coordination of the City of San Bernardino. AQMD Rule 1403 Asbestos and Demolition Notifications. AD Improvements Inc agrees to comply with all applicable provisions of the labor code, including those provisions requiring the payments of no less than the general prevailing rate of wages, pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.5. Any subcontractor entered into as a result of this agreement shall contain all the provisions of this clause.

AD Improvements Inc has the manpower, experience with similar project size and equipment to support our execution of the project to meet the estimated 30 month project duration. 3 Packet Pg. 663
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES CONTINUED...

City of San Bernardino representative has indicated all utilities are disconnected with the exceptions to the water, sewer is not confirmed. City has expressed they will help with any further disconnection. Dig Alert will be notified, and an active ticket will be in place, along with the ticket a third-party locating company will be hired to locate and mark utilities. Commercial industrial subcontractor will be used to disconnect and cap off all utilities.

Architectural and engineering design team will design commission system for the existing structure and for the remaining structured to be in place. AD Improvements, Inc. has the equipment and manpower to follow the design commission, subcontractors will also be used to fulfill project agreement.

Environmental consultant will perform a Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Report on the property to determine the location and quantities asbestos, lead, mold, and any other potential hazardous material on site. Soil sampling will also be requested if any evidence of soil hazardous is on site. If hazardous material is found on site, during the abatement phase air monitoring will be in place during the abatement process. For instance, the abandoned reservoirs and drums.

Project manager will coordinate with the On-Site Superintendent the project scheduling per phases and subcontractor needed to complete the work to be performed, in order to meet all milestones. Every step of the project will be reported to city officials during weekly briefings.

Senior Site Safety Hazardous Officer will review and implement AD Improvements, Inc. activity hazardous analysis report during the grading phase. Design-build team will follow SWPPP report, and follow recommendations to prevent site water runoffs and debris, which may cause street city drains. 4 Packet Pg. 664
Ricardo Ayala || On- Site Superintendent
Supervises all labor and movement, including mobilization and day-to-day reporting.

Terra Environmental
Superdry Restoration, Inc.

Van Diest Bros Inc Trinity Equipment Rentals
C Below, Inc.

Planet Green
Environmental, Inc.

Aileen Florian || Contract
Administrator
Manages project organization, administrative tasks
for successful completion of all contract
requirements and overall contract adherence.

Maricela Acosta || Accounts
Payable
Certifies payroll accuracy and fulfillment, long-term
financial standing, and all matters regarding
accounts payable.

Nellie Domingo ||
Contract Administrator
Manages project organization, administrative tasks
for successful completion of all contract
requirements and overall contract adherence.

Ingrid Domingo || Accounts
Receivable
Ensures office organization, day-to-day finances,
and all matters regarding accounts receivable.

OFFICE PERSONNEL
Miguel Barrios || Alternative Site
Safety Health Officer
Provides additional site safety support to head
SSHO, and on-site laborers, per all required
safety regulations.

Janet Morales || Project
Manager
Oversees the fulfillment and execution of
contracts on-budget, and in a timely
manner.

Austin Trujillo || Senior Site
Safety Health Officer
Directs all site safety measures, and
ensures safety guideline adherence per
city, state, and federal regulations.

DESIGN TEAM
Ali Kazemi || Director of
Engineering
Constructs design timeline and aids
project assessment and overall cost
estimation.

Amir Deihimi, P.E. ||
President
Responsible for all design aspects of
construction and demolition
projects, and site assessment.

BUILD TEAM
Robert Acosta || President/CEO
Presides over workforce, budget management,
and proper allocation of funds.

DESIGN-BUILD FIRM
AD IMPROVEMENTS, INC.

Core Structure , Inc.

SUBCONTRACTORS
PERSONNEL: DESIGN-BUILD ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Provides a survey asbestos assessment
and full report, as well as hygienists.

Specializes in HAZMAT work of all magnitudes,
including removal of contaminated soil, and
unwanted chemicals.

Engineering company well versed in utility
relocation in regards to utility, water, and
gas lines.

Furnishes on-call and extra labor, for mold
abatement, lead abatement, and demolition
needs.

Plans the architectural schematics for any
demolition or construction plans.

Produces additional equipment for
demolition purposes, on an as-needed basis.

Responsible for relocating underground utility
lines, and analyzing the schematics of utility
locations..

Key Resumes following this page...
5 Packet Pg. 665
Negotiation
Cost Control
Financial Planning
Delegation
Business Analysis
Solution Evaluation
Skills:

Directed budget control, scheduling adherence, and vendor negotiations.

Collaborated with Camp Pendleton upper-level management to coordinate overall project planning and execution.

Spearheaded estimating to ensure all company goal milestones were met.

Oversaw all company and subcontractor operations to revise cost factors, and secure the budget and schedule timeline.

Monitored flow of expenditures to fulfill target budget goals.

Remained informed on all Department of Transportation regulations and program requirements in order to be in compliance, per District 8 which constitutes San Bernardino & Riverside County.

Secured, scheduled, and retained quality subcontractors during entire construction period.

Developed and implemented plan to reduce material expenses.

Generated frequent reports for client reviewal.

Planned, organized, and managed entire construction project within $34,000,000 budget.

Experience:

AD IMPROVEMENTS, INC. • PRESIDENT/CEO • OCTOBER 2010- PRESENT Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Contract • $3,997,511.17 • April 2018- April 2020 • Abatement, Demolition, Grading
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Contract • $3,927,962.63 • April 2017- May 2018 • Demolition, Abatement, Grading
Caltrans Contract #08A2435 • $4,238,225.00 • October 2014 – June 2016 • Demolition & Abatement
LLAMADA FINAL MINISTRY • CONSTRUCTION MANAGER • 1997-2010 Llamada Final New Construction • $34,000,000.00 • 1997-2010 A: General Engineering
B: General Building
C21: Building Moving &
C22: Asbestos Abatement
Hazardous Substance Removal
Asbestos Certification
Relevant Licenses &
Certifications:

Contractor
Contractor
Demolition Contractor
Contractor
Certification
Education:

B.A. of Business Administration
University of Phoenix
#704437
With over 42 years of experience, Robert Acosta has dedicated his entire career to the construction field. His proficiency in international networking and ability to collaborate with diverse agencies, has not only allowed ADI to obtain numerous sizable projects, but engendered their successful execution.

His responsibilities consist of directing all company operations, and monitoring all construction activities.

ROBERT ACOSTA
PRESIDENT/CE0
(562) 381-3685
[email protected]
Contact:
6 Packet Pg. 666
Effective Communicator
Problem Solving
Risk Management
Collaboration
Project Organization
Bilingual (Spanish and English)
Skills:

Client-faced with contract manager and Camp Pendleton
construction supervisors in order to maintain constant
communication.

Inspected and certified that all materials and equipment delivered to job sites complied with approved submittals.

Performed inspections on a daily basis for compliance with plans and specifications.

Coordinated closely with quality control staff and governmental personnel for overall efficiency.

Analyzed contract specifications and planned company deadlines accordingly for demolition and abatement services.

Frequently rendezvoused with subcontractors to guarantee project compliance.

Managed tasks for all ADI staff to ensure adherence to original schedule and budget.

Met with contract representative to discuss and delineate schedule and cost details.

Experience:

AD IMPROVEMENTS, INC. • PROJECT MANAGER • DECEMBER 2014-

PRESENT
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Contract • $3,997,511.17 • April 2018- April 2020 • Abatement, Demolition, Grading
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Contract • $3,927,962.63 • April 2017- May 2018 • Demolition, Abatement, Grading
Caltrans Contract #08A2846 • $3,296,200.00 • August 2017- February 2019 • Demolition & Abatement
Caltrans Contract #08A2435 • $4,238,225.00 • October 2014 – June 2016 • Demolition & Abatement
Quality Control Management
EM 385-1-1 40 Hours
OSHA 30 Hours Construction
Safety and Health
Asbestos Supervisor
Lead Supervisor
Relevant Certifications:
#704437
Janet Morales has over eight years working in the construction field.

Her involvement has been crucial to completing several multi-million dollar projects on-time and on-budget. Her responsibilities consist of upholding quality control standards, scheduling, cost, and establishing milestones in coordination with company goals and deadlines.

JANET MORALES

PROJECT MANAGER
(562) 685-2585
[email protected]
Contact:
7 Packet Pg. 667
Knowledgeable
Team Leader
Adaptability
Safety Prioritization
Bilingual (Spanish and
English)
Skills:

Supervised all labor and movement of necessary equipment.

Kept in constant communication with Project Manager, Site Safety Officer, and client representatives in order to complete project swiftly and safely.

Maintained all construction quality and safety standards per federal and state regulations.

Led workforce to orchestrate a united effort, and complete all required procedures.

Informed project manager of unprecedented challenges, and adapted accordingly to adhere to predetermined timeline and budget.

Conducted air monitoring with sample analysis, as well as air clearance testing.

Oversaw all asbestos projects, and lead abatement work..

Performed inspections for all demolition contracts.

Trained on demolition site safety procedures.

Supervised several teams at various locations for demolition and abatement projects.

Formulated daily site reports, air monitor data sheets, and manifests.

Led extensive safety training for all teams to perform asbestosrelated work.

Experience:

AD IMPROVEMENTS, INC. • ON-SITE SUPERINTENDENT • FEBRUARY 2019-

PRESENT
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Contract • $3,997,511.17 • April 2018- April 2020 • Abatement, Demolition, Grading
TERRA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. • ON-SITE MONITOR & SUPERINTENDENT • APRIL 2016- JANUARY 2019
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL & ABATEMENT SOLUTIONS • PROJECT
SUPERVISOR • FEBRUARY 2013 - FEBRUARY 2016
California DOSH Certified Site
Surveillance Technician ( CSST)
California Department of Public
Health Lead Supervisor
California Department of Public
Health Lead Sampling Technician
Asbestos Contractor/Supervision
NIOSH 582
HAZWOP Certified (Hazardous
Waste Operations and Emergency
Response)
OSHA Construction Safety and
Health Training – 30 Hours
Relevant Certifications:
#704437
Ricardo Ayala has over ten years of experience leading a team as a Construction Superintendent. He’s highly experienced on qualityfocused construction and has exceptional leadership skills combined with vast knowledge of all construction sub trades. His specialization in demolition and abatement has played an immense role in completing large projects cautiously, yet efficiently.

RICARDO AYALA

ON-SITE SUPERINTENDENT
(626) 426-9062
[email protected]
Contact:
8 Packet Pg. 668
Detail-Oriented
Situational Awareness
Safety Prioritization
Consistency
Bilingual (Spanish and
English)
Skills: Ensured all safety requirements, codes, and regulations were fulfilled and followed by entire workforce.

Prioritized safety before commencement of demolition and asbestosrelated work.

Thoroughly trained workers on all site safety procedures.

Maintained a safe working environment to allow an efficient contract completion.

Performed safety inspections and enforced safety regulations at numerous project locations throughout Southern California.

Conducted daily site safety revisions, as well as daily supervision.

Experience:

AD IMPROVEMENTS, INC. • SENIOR SITE SAFETY HEALTH OFFICER • JANUARY 2017 - PRESENT
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Contract • $3,997,511.17 • April 2018- April 2020 • Abatement, Demolition, Grading
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Contract • $3,927,962.63 • April 2017- May 2018 • Demolition, Abatement, Grading
SIMPLE RESTORATION • SITE SAFETY HEALTH OFFICER • DECEMBER 2014- DECEMBER 2016
EM 385-1-1 Construction Hazard Awareness Safety Training ( 40 hours)
Fall Protection For Competent Person ( 24 hours)
OSHA Construction Safety and Health Training (30 hours) Fall Protection for Competent Person (5 hours)
Fall Protection Health & Safety Training (8 hours)
Fall Protection Health & Safety Training (8 hours)
Crystalline Silica Safety in Construction ( 1 hour)
Confined Space Supervisor Courser ( 8 hours)
Excavation and Trenching for Competent Person ( 5 hours) Fall Protection for Competent Person ( 5 hours)
NFPA 70 National Electrical Code ( 6 hours)
NFPA 70E National Electrical Code (Pending Completion)
Fall Protection for Competent Person (24 hours) Pending Safety Certifications:
#704437
A.S. in Construction
Management from
Fullerton College (May
2016)
Education:

With a long relationship with site safety management, Austin Trujillo has dedicated his career to ensuring the safety of every project site he has come across. Not to mention, his Associates Degree in the field of Construction Management corroborates his devotion to safety in construction. Austin's experience as a Safety Officer has led to the efficient and injury-free completion of several contracts.

AUSTIN TRUJILLO

SENIOR SITE SAFETY

HEALTH OFFICER
(714) 287-8542
[email protected]
Contact:
9 Packet Pg. 669

DESIGN STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
AMIR DEIHIMI, P.E. LICENSE NO. C78194

PRINCIPAL / PRESIDENT
10 Amir Deihimi has over 18+ years of structural engineering experience and brings a consistently strong record of client satisfaction. Through his responsiveness to clients’ needs along with his technical abilities and project leadership, Amir brings a real value to clients and projects. His broad range of experience with various types of projects and building materials provides our clients with the most efficient and cost saving design. Technology is a key component to our culture and Amir is well versed in Building Information Modeling (BIM).

ALI KAZEMI

DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Ali Kazemi has over 25 years of successful experience in structural engineering and project management. He has worked on a number of high-profile developments in a variety of sectors with his main focus being on single/multifamily, commercial and retail projects. He is dedicated to customer service and takes a personal interest in ensuring projects are completed on time and within budget. His standards are high, but it is in his ability to instill the same standards in his team of engineers, project managers and designers that makes Ali such an effective leader and asset to our clients.

COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EXAMPLES
The Glen, San Bernardino, CA
Multi Family Project
Olympic Blvd., Beverly Hills, CA
6 story Office Building with 3 level of
retail/office space over 3 levels of
subterranean parking.

Packet Pg. 670

UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
PROJECT DESIGN DESCRIPTION:

AD Improvements, Inc. is a business local to San Bernardino, equipped and qualified to complete the demolition of the Carousel Mall. Please see our chronological narrative below regarding our project design.

Phase 1 of our project plan is designated for the staging area as well as site security. ADI will provide 24-hour surveillance for the project’s entirety. Moreover, we will install temporary power in-office. This will allow us to contact all utility companies and verify the location of high voltage power lines, water lines, fire lines, and gas lines both active and inactive.

Next, our underground utility company will locate all utilities and generate a comprehensive map, locating every utility line on site. After acquiring the proper permits and approvals, our plumbing and electrical company will disconnect power per city codes and utility company.

After all the conditions have been met, ADI will initiate site security to prevent any intruders, vandalism, homeless encampments, or illegal occupations on-site.

Once the site is secure, AD Improvements will address the design aspects of the project. This requires a pre-performance meeting with our structural engineers, mechanical engineers, environmental consultants, and all subcontractors involved.

Our environmental consultants will conduct and perceive a complete reconnaissance, and procure various samples. Thus, creating a comprehensive report of different locations and quantities of all asbestos containing material. This necessary action will confirm the results of our independent testing of the site materials, and visual inspections. Our visual inspections of the main structure reveal that in order to mitigate the fires that have occurred, the fire department disturbed several types of material known to contain asbestos, which will require a roof inspection.

This being addressed, AD Improvements will follow environmental recommendations given the approval of every government agency involved with the submitted reports.

Furthermore, AQMD, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, and other government agencies will visit the site, where our team of experts and qualified personnel will be ready on a moment's notice to report, advise, and direct any concerns raised by city officials.

Based on the environmental recommendation, we will proceed with either a routine abatement process per AQMD instructions. We plan to take into thorough consideration, the safety conditions and amount of risk involved. To do so, our senior safety personnel will create a comprehensive safety plan to follow recommendations from AQMD, consultants, as well as our management team.

In regards to the transportation of the asbestos-containing materials, ADI plans to adhere to the guidelines set forth by the Department of Transportation, to ensure proper burial and mitigate safety concerns. To track the departure of said materials, AD Improvements maintains a log placing a location on all disposed asbestos-containing materials.

Once the necessary remediation processes have been safely completed, ADI’s next task is to remove all leftover paint or unmarked chemicals left on site. For instance, the automotive building contains an existing reservoir of unknown and unmarked liquid substance. Our consultants will take samples, as well as dispose of said unknown materials per lab results and guidelines for how to proceed for safe disposal.

This would launch the commencement of the demolition phase of this project. First and foremost, ADI will conduct a safety meeting with city officials, structural engineers, and architects to formulate a demolition plan, coinciding with all technical schematics drafted by our design team.
11 Packet Pg. 671

UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
PROJECT DESIGN DESCRIPTION CONTINUED...

Once all conditions have been fully assessed and reviewed, we will initiate demolition from distinct points of the site, per our structural engineers and demolition plan; paying particular attention to demolishing the connecting bridges without jeopardizing the integrity of the parking structure.

Our On-Site Superintendent will supervise all conditions regarding dust control, public and city safety concerns, and traffic control, in order to prevent incident occurrence in all areas of demolition. This would involve daily safety meetings, as well as weekly progress meetings with city officials and Project Manager Janet Morales, to address all city or governmental concerns.

The demolition of the building will begin with the two buildings, detached from the main structure, to eliminate any safety concerns regarding pedestrians or city traffic.

First, trucking companies will arrive at the site to prepare for the workday, which will be from 7 AM to 3:30 PM unless otherwise specified by city officials. The process of loading and transporting open debris from the site will adhere to pollution controls, in order to erase the possibility of falling debris. Before they depart, all safety officers must verify the truck’s departure and maintain safety standards, such as inspecting the truck’s protective cover, necessary to prevent debris from falling onto the street or highway.

Following the state’s and city’s recyclable conditions, demolition disposal will be performed as follows:

All recyclable debris will be addressed per city guidelines for the proper removal. Hence, it shall be taken from the site to an approved recycling facility, from which all debris will be taken to a state-approved landfill facility. While all this is being processed, ADI’s personnel will draft reports to attest quantities and locations of waste management facilities.

Once all erected structures are demolished, the demolition phase is complete. AD Improvements will conduct a safety meeting with city officials and structural engineers, to address the removal of all foundations and basement structures. This will be following the guidelines given by our consultants and geotechnical engineers.

This next phase will involve the removal of pistons and shaft equipment of all site elevators. Not to mention addressing potential carbon liquids spilled surrounding the elevators and mechanical escalators. Also, the removal of all foundational concrete materials, which will be pulverized on- site per city engineer’s approval.

Given the history of the site, and the fact that there are multiple reports of potentially contaminated soil, ADI will report to city officials upon discovery. Per city instructions, ADI will report to the city of San Bernardino to discuss remedial efforts and costs.

The removal of those items and foundations, leads to the next step, which is soil compaction. Per our Soil Compaction Engineer, we will compact the soil at 95%, and the remaining building footprint will undergo rough grading. This will conclude the Design-Build portion of the Scope of Work.

To reiterate, city officials will be able to inspect all processes and phases, step-by-step. In return, ADI requests that San Bernardino prepare to act upon their public safety concerns, and make them known to us, in order to proceed accordingly.

Our extensive history of working alongside government agencies within the City of San Bernardino and its surrounding vicinities, has shown our true investment in the communities involved. We plan to cultivate this investment by collaborating with city officials as well as the city engineer, completing this project on-time and on-budget.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: SEE FOLLOWING PAGE.
12 Packet Pg. 672

UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
AD Improvements, Inc. certifies that all program and performance requirements are met by the proposal. This includes prevailing wage rates, and all applicable provisions of the Labor Code, for both AD Improvements, Inc. and all its subcontractors. Design-Build team shall also perform its due diligence in regards to all existing and future city, state, and federal regulations that affect work performance, and those employed to execute said contract.

AD Improvements Inc will perform in accordance with the Architectural Engineering Schematic Drawing, City of San Bernardino compliance and regulations, and comply with the State Labor Code, Cal/OSHA Title 8CCR1529.1 Asbestos, AQMD Rule 1403 and FED/OSHA 29 CFR1926.1101, per the environmental study prepared by Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Consultants.

PROJECT COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM PROGRAM AND PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS:

LIFE CYCLE COST:

The overall life cycle cost goal for AD Improvements, is to highlight the impact this project will incur on the public, environment, and time period of the project. Demolition can often cause concern for safety and other hazards. However, AD Improvements is dedicated to diminishing any potential disturbances, and mitigating any unprecedented challenges.

ADI recognizes the importance of safety for a project of this magnitude. To begin, our Project Manager, Janet Morales, will be reporting to AQMD to comply with air quality control local ordinances. Senior Safety Health Officer Austin Trujillo has the experience and qualifications to accurately assess any risk to the public and employees. His experience overseeing several multi million dollar projects, such as at Naval Base Miramar and Camp Pendleton, serve as evidence of his safety adherence. Moreover, Austin will be conducting daily meetings to assure all safety protocols are followed by employees and personnel that enter the site. This will eliminate overruns, extra expenses, government fees, penalties, injuries, and even death.

In terms of public safety, ADI has built a long rapport with Incompli Inc, never once encountering issues related to stormwater. Incompli will assess water runoffs and SWPPP Report, and a site specific report will be generated to prevent runoff to street drains. The correct plan will prevent problems and incidents.

Traffic control is also an impactful facet of public safety. ADI will be working from 7am to 3pm during lower traffic times, to mitigate city congestion. Not to mention, no transportation or import will be active later than 8am. Our work plan will have little to no impact on nearby freeways due to our traffic control plan.

Additionally, our high-quality fleet of equipment, is known for its ability to produce minimal noise; thus avoiding residential and commercial disturbance.

Demolishing the Carousel Mall will be a net positive job performance for the city of San Bernardino, alleviating issues such as homeless encampments, site monitoring costs, and preparing the site for future development. 16 Packet Pg. 673

UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
SUMMARY OF VALUE-ADDED ENHANCEMENTS:

SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS:

See following pages.

Through the proper demolition and site preparation process of the Carousel Mall, the dangers of homeless residence and illegal occupation of the site will be eliminated. It will also be void of all environmental hazardous material disturbances that have occurred in the past, which have caused Carousel Mall to become a nuisance to the residents of San Bernardino. After all the improvements are complete, enhancements of the land will make it usable to construct new infrastructure, for the benefit of the community and residents of San Bernardino County.
17 Packet Pg. 674

REFERENCES
Golden West College Frank Fonseca
Manager, Maintenance & Operations
Ph: (714) 895-8158
Email: [email protected]
Project Size: $107,775.00
Demolition and disposal of building, removal
of foundation, asbestos removal.

Department of
Transportation
(Caltrans)
Jackie Williams
Contract Specialist
Ph: (909) 383-6877
Email: [email protected]
Project Size: $4,238,225.00
Demolition of numerous single family
dwellings, three commercial restaurants, 1
hotel, 2 gas stations. Removal of high voltage
power communication lines, Capping all
utilities, Management of traffic control on
adjacent off-ramps.

Overland, Pacific &
Cutler, LLC
Josh Cosper
Client Representative
Ph: (951) 870-3094
Email: [email protected]
Project Size: $4,500,000.00
Expansion of 91 freeway: demolition of
multiple structures along the 91 freeway and
the 15 interexchange.

NAVFAC Southwest
MCBCP
Tracy Thompkins
Contract Specialist
Ph: (760) 725-0782
Email: [email protected]
Project Size: $3,997,511.17
Removal and Disposal of 40 structures.

NAVFAC Southwest
MCBCP
Alfonso Reyes
Engineering Technician
Ph: (760) 212-5364
Email: [email protected]
Project Size: $3,927,962.63
Demolition of 20+ structures at Camp
Pendleton.

Organization Contact Information Project Size & Description 20 Packet Pg. 675
Department of Transportation (CALTRANS)
$4,200,000.00
AD Improvements, Inc. was the prime contractor for the removal and demolition of 25 structures.

Caltrans provided its own in-house engineer, as well as survey reports. We had an underground utility locating company to identify each of the utilities. We then created a schematic drawing/map of all utilities that were site specific. ADI relocated a 36 inch water line supporting the City of Yorba Linda before the removal of an abandoned transit water line. In addition we removed and relocated high voltage power lines to residential areas, and re-routed gas lines. ADI made demolition plans to remove all 25 structures that included a double wall billboard sign, 40 unit hotel, 3 restaurants, 2 gas stations and 17 single family dwellings. In the process ADI encountered multiple unprecedented cesspools and abandoned septic tanks. However, due to our experience level, these unwanted items did not jeopardize our timeline nor overall efficiency, but rather, were handled swiftly without incidents. We had a final clean up and inspection by the site road contractor, which was approved.

Client
Project Cost
Project
Description
Client
Project Cost
Project
Description
Department of Defense, NAVFAC Southwest Camp Pendleton
$7,500,000.00
AD Improvements, Inc. was the prime contractor for the demolition, removal and disposal of 40 structure sites at Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California. The purpose of this project was to remove old structures and make room for new construction on base. ADI made a list of proper surveys for each property and a list of contaminants ( lead, asbestos etc. ) as well contaminated soil. We then created demo plans per site specifications, safety site specific plans and reports for SPCD-air quality control management. ADI also created 11 binders for demo plans with task orders for each site that included the following; safety route in and out of base, a report for equipment on each site, schedules with proper approval from the structural engineer team. As a preventative measure ADI extracted additional roof material on what was assumed to be contaminated, while our abatement workers were removing the roof penetrations to have those samples tested .The final execution of the task was the removal of high voltage power lines, communication lines and water lines. Once having approval plans for lead and asbestos, with demolition, was performed expertly avoiding potential dangers related to work being performed by an active road with traffic. Grading and site cleaning followed by the approval and final execution of structural engineers. This project was completed ahead of schedule.

AD Improvements, Inc. was one of multiple companies that was a part of the Design Build Team in charge of remediation, demolition, of multiple structures along the 91 freeway and the 15 interexchange. The type of structures were as follows: a parking structure approximately 30,000 square feet with post tension cabling system, as well as a tilt up building, multi family dwellings, and curb and gutter, removed on both sides of the old off ramps on the 91 freeway and 15 interchange.

On the 215 freeway, by the Grand Terrace off ramp, ADI found underground fuel tanks and abandoned gas lines of contaminated soil full of carbons. ADI removed all tanks and abandoned gas lines per code and regulations with approvals. This was a three year job that was fully executed without incident. ADI is still an on-call contractor that OPC uses for future projects. All freeway expansions along the 215 Interchange were a part of this project's success.

Overland Pacific and Cutler - Expansion of East/West bound 91 freeway/ 15 Interchange $6,500,000.00
Client
Project Cost
Project
Description

LIST OF REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
22 Packet Pg. 676
Packet Pg. 677
Packet Pg. 678
Packet Pg. 679
Packet Pg. 680
Packet Pg. 681
Packet Pg. 682
Packet Pg. 683
Packet Pg. 684
Packet Pg. 685
Packet Pg. 686
Packet Pg. 687
Packet Pg. 688
Packet Pg. 689
Packet Pg. 690
Packet Pg. 691
Packet Pg. 692
Packet Pg. 693
Packet Pg. 694
 
  
 Packet Pg. 695
Packet Pg. 696
 
  
 Packet Pg. 697
Packet Pg. 698
Packet Pg. 699
 
  
 Packet Pg. 700
 
  
 Packet Pg. 701
 
  
 Packet Pg. 702
 
  
 Packet Pg. 703
 
  
 Packet Pg. 704
Packet Pg. 705
Packet Pg. 706
Packet Pg. 707
Packet Pg. 708
Packet Pg. 709
Packet Pg. 710
Packet Pg. 711
Packet Pg. 712
Packet Pg. 713
Packet Pg. 714
Packet Pg. 715
Packet Pg. 716
Packet Pg. 717
Packet Pg. 718
 
  
 Packet Pg. 719
Packet Pg. 720
September 29, 2022
Hand Delivered
City Council
City of San Bernardino
290 North D Street, 3rd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92401
RE:

Silverado Contractors, Inc., is licensed by the California State Contractor’s License Board —License No. 782547 A — General Engineering Contractor, B — General Building Contractor, C21 — Building Moving, Demolition C22 — Asbestos Abatement ASB/HAZ— Hazardous Substances Removal Asbestos Contractor Registration DOSH #863 Contractors Registration No DIR # 1000006758 , OSHA Annual Permit D3 #90787, Trenching and Excavation Annual Permit No. 905359 Qualified SWPPP Developer/Practitioner, Certified Professional Storm Water Quality, Erosion and Sediment (QSD) #024,(CPSWQ) #608, (CPESC) #4406, California Certified Asbestos Consultant #04-3593 Packet Pg. 721
Proposal Forms
Required Forms and Attachments
Packet Pg. 722
Request for Proposals September 1, 2022
Carousel Mall Demolition Project

Page 20 ends

ATTACHMENT 6

PROPOSAL FORMS
Proposal forms must be completed in their entirety or the Design-Build Entity may be deemed non-responsive in City’s sole discretion.

PROPOSAL TO:

City of San Bernardino
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
Attn: Alex Qishta, P.E. Deputy Director of Public Works / City Engineer 201 North “E” Street, 2nd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92401
PROPOSAL FOR:

Submit in a separate, sealed envelope, from the design proposal, clearly marked for identification.

A. SUBMITTAL
(1) IDENTIFICATION OF DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY:

Legal Name of Design-Build Entity:

Federal I.D. Number:

Contractor’s License Number:

License Expiration Date:

License Classification:

Business Address:

Business Telephone:

Business Facsimile Number:

Primary Contact Name:

Contact Email Address:
(2) ADDENDUM:

Receipt of the following Addenda is hereby acknowledged:

Number Date
A General Engineering, B General Building, C21, C22, ASB/HAZ 13804 Oaks Avenue, Chino, CA 91710
909-949-6025
909-949-6815
Dan Ngo
California License No. 782547
August 31, 2024 (Renewed Annually)
Silverado Contractors, Inc.
94-3367658

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION PROJECT
1 9/20/2022
[email protected]
2 9/22/2022
Packet Pg. 723
Request for Proposals September 1, 2022
Carousel Mall Demolition Project

Page 21 ends

B. COST PROPOSAL
The undersigned hereby proposes and agrees to furnish all design services, construction labor, materials, equipment, including management and oversight, to perform all work required for the Project in the manner and time described in the undersigned’s design proposal and documents.

The Cost Proposal, set forth below, includes all costs of the scope of work as requested in the RFP, and required by the provisions of the Design-Build Contract, including the cost of bonds, insurance, sales tax, and every other item of expense, direct or indirect, incidental to the scope of work.
(1) COST PROPOSAL BUDGET:

ITEM DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMOUNT

1. Design and Preconstruction Services $

2. Demolition Services (General Conditions) $

3. Construction Cost (to secure attached buildings) $

4. Allowances $

5. Fee $

6. Contingency (10% City Owned) $
Total COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE LUMP SUM PRICE
OF:

C. PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION
(1) LUMP SUM PRICE:

The undersigned, having fully examined the RFP and any and all attachments, exhibits, and addenda thereto, and site of the Project, proposes to furnish all design and construction labor, materials, and equipment, and do all work in compliance with the terms and conditions of the RFP, without exception, and the herein proposal, for a Lump Sum Price of:
($ )
The Lump Sum Price includes City Owned Contingency, the amount of which is specified in the RFP. Any funds from City Owned Contingency not expended pursuant to written approval by City shall revert to City and shall not accrue for the benefit of the undersigned. (2) TIME FOR COMPLETION:

The undersigned agrees to comply with City’s Master Project Schedule as specified in this RFP.

The undersigned further agrees that Completion of work required by the Design-Build Contract resulting from this RFP and the herein Proposal shall be no later than December 31, 2022. (3) CERTIFICATION:
(a) The undersigned has read and understands the RFP.
(b) The undersigned has become familiar with local site conditions under which the work is to be performed and has correlated personal observations with the requirements of the RFP.
390,000.00 20,465,000.00 92,000.00 2,967,000.00 2,391,400.00 2,630,540.00 28,935,940.00 $28,935,940.00 Twenty-eight million, nine hundred thirty-five thousand, nine hundred forty thousand Packet Pg. 724
Request for Proposals September 1, 2022
Carousel Mall Demolition Project

Page 22 ends

(c) The proposal submitted by the undersigned is made in accordance with the RFP and is based upon the materials, systems, and equipment specified therein that will support or exceed the minimum quality, service, utilization, performance, and other levels specified therein, without exception; and the undersigned agrees that City is not responsible for any error or omission in this proposal or in its preparation.
(d) The undersigned will design and construct facilities that are fully functional and meet or exceed all function, program, performance, and other requirements of City as identified in the RFP, and for the Lump Sum Price specified above. (e) If City recommends the undersigned be awarded the Design-Build Contract, the undersigned will meet with City to review in detail this proposal and will make any necessary changes or revisions to this proposal, including any and all design submittals and proposed materials, systems, and equipment to ensure delivery to City of fully functional facilities which meet or exceed all requirements of City as identified in the RFP without revision to the Lump Sum Price. (f) The undersigned acknowledges and warrants that the Design-Build Entity includes, at a minimum, architects, engineers, other necessary or specified design professionals and consultants, and a general contractor as identified and pre-qualified in the Request for Qualifications process. Substitutions of architects, engineers and other design professionals and consultants, or general contractors as identified in the Statement of Qualifications and any identified in this proposal, will not be made without City’s written consent to such substitution(s).
(g) The undersigned and each of its subconsultants, contractors, and subcontractors shall at all times during the execution of the work contemplated by the RFP, be qualified to complete the work, and each shall comply with all applicable State of California and City of San Bernardino professional and business licensing and registration requirements.
(h) The undersigned will not modify, amend, revoke or withdraw this proposal, without written permission of City for a period of not less than ninety (90) calendar days following the submission due date and time specified in the RFP or until a final Design-Build Contract has been executed, whichever occurs first. (i) The undersigned, or any member of the Design-Build Entity or Design-Build Team, or any agent or representative thereof, has not collaborated or communicated with, or entered into any understanding agreements, whether written or oral, whether direct or indirect, or otherwise, with any other DesignBuild Entity or Design-Build Team, or any agent or representative thereof, in the preparation of this proposal.
(j) The undersigned has reviewed in detail the Design-Build Contract attached to this RFP and takes no exception to its terms and conditions and warrants that nothing contained in the Design-Build Contract would preclude the Design-Build Entity from entering into the Design-Build Contract.
(k) This proposal is genuine and is not a sham or made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any person or entity not herein named.

Packet Pg. 725
Silverado Contractors, Inc., Corporate Seal
(enhanced to show up in .pdf documents)
Packet Pg. 726

ITEM PRICING TOTAL
$ 390,000.00
$ 175,000.00
$ 30,000.00
$ 25,000.00
$ 35,000.00
$ 125,000.00
$ 20,465,000.00
$ 17,130,000.00
$ 2,543,000.00
$ 177,000.00
$ 75,000.00
$ 540,000.00
$ 92,000.00
$ 80,000.00
$ 12,000.00
$ 2,967,000.00
$ 150,000.00
$ 65,000.00
$ 1,850,000.00
$ 182,000.00
$ 720,000.00
$ 2,391,400.00
$ 2,630,540.00
$ 28,935,940.00
* Silverado proposes a Fee of 10% on Items 1 through 4.

2. Demolition Services
Hazardous Materials Abatement
Total Budget Price:

Hazardous Soils Testing
Abatement of Mall Roof
Abatement of Waterproofing Materials on Retaining Walls Removal of Asphalt and Concrete Material From Site
Carousel Mall Demolition Project

PROJECT BUDGET COST BREAKDOWN
Building/Structural Isolations
Pedestrian Bridges

DESCRIPTION

1. Design and Preconstruction Services
Architecural Design and Consultation Services
Structural Engineering Consultation Services
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
GPR & Surveying Services
Environmental Consultant Services (Sampling & Procedure 5 Plan) Silverado Contractors Inc. is providing this supplemental project cost breakdown to better illustrate how we obtained our guaranteed maximum price.

5. Fee*
Payment and Performance Bond

6. Contingency (10% City Owned)
Building Demolition
Crush Asphalt and Concrete on Site

3. Construction Costs (to secure attached buildings)
Harris Building
Enterprise building

4. Allowances

integrity • excellence • teamwork • appreciation • innovation • perseverance Packet Pg. 727 September 29, 2022
Hand Delivered
City Council
City of San Bernardino
290 North D Street, 3rd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92401
RE:

Silverado Contractors, Inc., is licensed by the California State Contractor’s License Board —License No. 782547 A — General Engineering Contractor, B — General Building Contractor, C21 — Building Moving, Demolition C22 — Asbestos Abatement ASB/HAZ— Hazardous Substances Removal Asbestos Contractor Registration DOSH #863 Contractors Registration No DIR # 1000006758 , OSHA Annual Permit D3 #90787, Trenching and Excavation Annual Permit No. 905359 Qualified SWPPP Developer/Practitioner, Certified Professional Storm Water Quality, Erosion and Sediment (QSD) #024,(CPSWQ) #608, (CPESC) #4406, California Certified Asbestos Consultant #04-3593 Packet Pg. 728
Proposal Forms
Required Forms and Attachments
Packet Pg. 729
Request for Proposals September 1, 2022
Carousel Mall Demolition Project

Page 20 ends

ATTACHMENT 6

PROPOSAL FORMS
Proposal forms must be completed in their entirety or the Design-Build Entity may be deemed non-responsive in City’s sole discretion.

PROPOSAL TO:

Submit in a separate, sealed envelope, from the design proposal, clearly marked for identification.

A. SUBMITTAL
(1) IDENTIFICATION OF DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY:

Legal Name of Design-Build Entity:

Federal I.D. Number:

Contractor’s License Number:

License Expiration Date:

License Classification:

Business Address:

Business Telephone:

Business Facsimile Number:

Primary Contact Name:

Contact Email Address:
(2) ADDENDUM:

Receipt of the following Addenda is hereby acknowledged:

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION PROJECT
1 9/20/2022
[email protected]
2 9/22/2022
Packet Pg. 730
Request for Proposals September 1, 2022
Carousel Mall Demolition Project

Page 21 ends

ITEM DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMOUNT

1. Design and Preconstruction Services $

2. Demolition Services (General Conditions) $

3. Construction Cost (to secure attached buildings) $

4. Allowances $

5. Fee $

6. Contingency (10% City Owned) $
Total COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE LUMP SUM PRICE
OF:

C. PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION
(1) LUMP SUM PRICE:

The undersigned agrees to comply with City’s Master Project Schedule as specified in this RFP.

The undersigned further agrees that Completion of work required by the Design-Build Contract resulting from this RFP and the herein Proposal shall be no later than December 31, 2022. (3) CERTIFICATION:
(a) The undersigned has read and understands the RFP.
(b) The undersigned has become familiar with local site conditions under which the work is to be performed and has correlated personal observations with the requirements of the RFP.
$28,935,940.00
Twenty-eight million, nine hundred thirty-five thousand, nine hundred forty thousand Packet Pg. 731
Request for Proposals September 1, 2022
Carousel Mall Demolition Project

Page 22 ends

Packet Pg. 732
Silverado Contractors, Inc., Corporate Seal
(enhanced to show up in .pdf documents)
Packet Pg. 733

SUBMITTED BY

ORIGINAL

PROPOSAL

CITY OF SAN BERNADINO

CAROUSEL MALL

DEMOLITION
Packet Pg. 734
Section x
Title

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A

A TABLE OF CONTENTS
Packet Pg. 735
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 1 ends

A Table of Contents
B. Transmittal Cover Letter
C. Executive Summary
D. Proposed Scope of Services
E. Personnel
F. Understanding of Project
G. References
H. List of Representative Projects
I. Proposal Form (see separate envelope)
J. Required Forms
Appendix

1. Resumes

2. Work Plan

3. Hazardous Assessment
Packet Pg. 736
Section x
Title

TRANSMITTAL COVER LETTER
B

B TRANSMITTAL COVER LETTER
Packet Pg. 737
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 1 ends

B Transmittal
Mr. Alex Qishta, P.E.

City Engineer – Public Works Department
City of San Bernardino
201 N. E Street, Suite 200
San Bernardino, CA 92401
RE: Technical Proposal – Carousel Mall Demolition
Dear Mr. Qishta,
Griffith Company is pleased to present the City of San Bernardino with our Technical Proposal for the Carousel Mall Demolition project. Our team is excited about the potential opportunity to partner with the City as a designbuild contractor to complete the design and demolition services as requested in the Request for Proposals (RFP), dated September 1, 2022.

We have identified that the most important aspect of this project is to remove the existing mall in a safe manner that leaves the existing historical buildings intact and believe that our experience with such practices will meet and exceed the needs of the City. We also recognize that the RFP requests a design-build contractor with previous experience in design-build projects. Griffith Company brings over a billion dollars in design-build experience making us a great fit for this project.

Due to the unique requirements for this project, we have gathered an industry leading team. Cannon Corporation is our lead design firm and will take the lead on providing design deliverables. Miyamoto International specializes in historical buildings and will perform structural calculations. Focus Environmental Consulting will develop our asbestos survey while Janus Corporation will perform the asbestos abatement and clean-up following all federal, state, and local regulations. Force Demolition Inc. brings their expertise in soft and structural demolition of the Carousel Mall.

We look forward to working with the City of San Bernardino to meet the challenges and goals established for this design-build project. We are committed to providing you and your stakeholders with superior designbuild construction services. We attest that the information contained in this proposal is true and correct. We acknowledge receipt of Addendum No. 1.

Sincerely,
Lucas J. Walker
Vice President/Regional Manager
Griffith Company
3050 E Birch St., Brea, CA 92821
Single Point of Contact
Ky McLeod
3050 E Birch St., Brea, CA 92821
Office: (714) 984-5500 Ext. 5596
Mobile: (562)204-4683
Email: [email protected]
Packet Pg. 738
Section x
Title

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
C

C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Packet Pg. 739
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 2 ends

C Executive Summary
Since its inception over a century ago in 1902, Griffith Company (Griffith) has been recognized as a local, full-service general engineering contractor with the capabilities, engineering expertise, and resources to handle a wide range of projects and project delivery methods, including design-build. Griffith is 100% employee-owned, ensuring that each employee/owner remains personally invested in maintaining the safety and quality of the work performed. Originally a family-owned and operated company, Griffith still upholds a family-oriented tradition of integrity, fairness, and commitment to excellence. Together, Griffith continues to uphold the company’s guiding principles, collectively known as the Griffith Way: honesty, integrity, and a commitment to meeting its obligations while exceeding expectations.

Griffith crews have constructed hundreds of important transportation and infrastructure projects from the original road system built in the 1920s and 1930s to the great freeway expansion in the 1960s. In the last 20 years, Griffith has completed thousands of projects totaling almost $3 billion in value. A majority of these projects are transportation, airport, and railroad projects in areas where the project management teams must consider the residents, business community, and day-to-day facility operations in its planning process. Griffith is composed of divisions that specialize in almost every civil scope of work including demolition, earthwork, underground utilities, minor concrete, asphalt, structural concrete, landscape, and irrigation, environmental remediation, and construction materials. Griffith has developed a remarkable workforce of over 600 craft workers in the Southern California market and has strong ties with the local unions.

Force Demolition Inc. (Force) is a full-service demolition company founded by Duane Pate, who is known as an industry leader in the demolition business. The company combines the expertise of over 30 years of experience in technical demolition projects throughout the Southern California market. Force has successfully completed projects for general contractors, developers, cities, and state entities. They complete all aspects of demolition and abatement needs for their clients in private and public sectors. Their capabilities include soft demolition, tenant improvements, total site clearing, selective demolition removals, and total structure demolition. They have built their expertise on projects at LAX (Airports), High Rise Structures, School Districts (Education), and Hospitals/Medical Offices (Healthcare), among other areas. Force is union signatory and they are a Small Business Enterprise (SBE) certified by the State of California. Force’s operations team is considered to be one of the safest, most productive, and most professional teams in the Southern California.

Janus Corporation (Janus) is a California environmental company that has been in business since 1989. They
specialize in hazardous removal projects with a focus in environmental compliance, safety, waste minimization, asbestos abatement, lead remediation, mold abatement, heavy metal decontamination, biohazards, and bio cumulative toxic substances. They are fully licensed, bonded, and insured at levels that meet or exceed industry standards and serve all of California. Their home office is in Northern California and branch offices are located in the San Diego, Los Angeles, and Sacramento areas. Janus’ current Experience Modification Rate (EMR) is 0.91.

Focus Environmental Consulting (Focus) is a familyowned environmental consulting firm founded in 2007.

They offer extensive experience in environmental consulting and project management while providing cost-effective,
reliable solutions for owner’s environmental needs. Focus specializes in Complete demolition and removal of
the existing American Airlines Terminal
4 head house structure at LAX. This
structure was a five-story tall approx.
200,000 sq/ft attached to existing
active terminal structures on each end
Complete abatement and removal of
approx. 220,000 sq/ft of existing
sprayed on asbestos fireproofing
Packet Pg. 740
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 3 ends

asbestos, lead-based paint, and microbial testing, design, project monitoring, and project management. Their staff has handled oversight for projects with crews of 100+ men following strict federal, state, and local laws within OSHA safety standards. These projects include military bases, United States postal offices, prison facilities, federal government buildings, power plants, unified school district facilities, numerous commercial and industrial buildings, and multi-family residential sites. While working at these project sites, Focus collected bulk samples for initial surveys, conducted air monitoring during abatement projects, maintained the accuracy of the contractor’s emergency response information, implemented the contractor’s Health & Safety program, and coordinated with emergency responders. Focus is committed in providing their clients with the highest quality of environmental service. The goal for each project is to develop a scope of work that will meet the client’s objectives practically and economically. They take pride in their experience and professional dedication and are committed to providing the necessary resources and service to maintain and further develop their expertise to meet customer needs. Their continued responsiveness to the ever-evolving needs of the industry distinguishes them in the Southern California marketplace.

Cannon Corporation is a full-service engineering,
surveying, and construction management firm that takes pride in the ability to offer clients a broad range of services. During the course of their 46 years in business, they have worked with many cities, counties, and agencies throughout California to maintain secure and dependable wastewater/water systems, make streets safer, add more pedestrian and bicycle-friendly streets, and construct buildings and facilities that are structurally sound. They are dedicated to providing a high level of technical expertise in areas of low impact development (LID) design. They have a team of more than 130 professionals including registered civil, electrical, mechanical, and structural engineers; automation and SCADA system specialists; licensed land surveyors; and Caltrans certified construction managers and inspectors. They offer expertise in structural engineering, topographic survey, computer modeling, horizontal directional drilling, regulatory requirements, permit assistance, street designs, LID design, lift stations, reservoir/water storage, construction management and inspection.

Additionally, they have strong experience in the preparation of engineering documents for each phase of design and construction.

Miyamoto International, Inc. (Miyamoto) is a global
engineering and disaster risk management company,
providing critical services that sustain industries and safeguard communities around the world. They are experts in disaster-resilient engineering that controls damages. They assess the performance of buildings and work with communities to identify specific vulnerabilities to disasters and prioritize solutions that limit damage, business interruption and loss of life. Built on decades of structural, MEP engineering, humanitarian assistance, and disaster risk reduction experience in the field, their expertise supports how clients address the economic, political, social, and sustainability challenges in disaster risk reduction and post-disaster recovery and reconstruction.

Miyamoto’s offices are strategically located worldwide in regions vulnerable to disasters to positively impact economies and save lives.

Complete abatement and removal
of approx. 185,000 sq/ft of existing
asbestos floor tile with mastic
Complete demolition and removal of
the existing AMC IMAX theater, Star
Bucks, and other Downtown Disney
Retail Store structures at Disneyland
Resort. This structure was a three-story
tall approx. 100,000 sq/ft attached
to existing active retail stores including
being approx. 7’ from the historic Disney
Monorail
To construct Valley View Grade Separation Project it was imperative to coordinate with the various project stakeholders, meet the tight project milestones and construct various elements of the job simultaneously. Griffith Company partnered with us from the beginning and successfully met each of the project challenges to build the largest capital improvement project in the history of City of Santa Fe Springs.

Noe Negrete, Director of Public Works, City of Santa Fe Springs Packet Pg. 741
Section x
Title

PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
D

D PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
Packet Pg. 742
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 4 ends

D Proposed Scope of Services
Design
The design efforts for the Carousel Mall Demolition will be led by Cannon Corporation. This will include coordination with the City of San Bernardino to discuss plan development needs and requirements. The design will incorporate a title sheet, City index sheets with general project notes, a BMP plan per the SWPPP, and a civil site plan detailing the limits of demolition for the project. Once the demolition of the building is complete and the existing contours are established, the design for the final site grades will be completed.
>>Structural Analysis
The structural engineering scope, performed by Miyamoto International, will include preparation of a structural assessment report and analysis to address the existing and proposed conditions related to the existing historic buildings and parking structure adjacent to the mall building. The structural scope will also include the necessary details to address the impacted interfaces between the mall structure and the historic buildings and parking structure including exposed metal surfaces, reinforcement, and water proofing. Any structural detailing related to the architectural treatment or reveals associated with the historic buildings are excluded from the structural scope of work at this time.

Site Preparation
>>Fencing & Site Security
The areas around the project limits will be delineated and fenced off with proper signage to maintain safety and keep pedestrians out of the work zone. This will be around the Carousel Mall as well as the two outer buildings. There will be ingress and egress gates located at each work zone. Griffith will employ a full-time security guard, per the RFP, that will patrol the site 24/7 during our operation. The guard will make sure that only authorized personnel are allowed within the project limits.
>>SWPPP
After creating the site Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD), Griffith’s inhouse Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) will ensure that the project team installs site Best Management Practices (BMPs) per the requirements of the SWPPP. BMPs will include perimeter sediment and erosion control measures, storm drain inlet protection construction entrance/exits. The QSP will conduct weekly inspections and create reports to verify that the BMPs are in compliance with the site SWPPP. The QSP will also create the Notice of Intent (NOI), Notice of Termination (NOT), and Annual SWPPP Report that is submitted in the SMARTS system on the CA Water Board website.

Environmental Survey
Focus Environmental Consulting (Focus) will conduct a comprehensive demolition survey including, but not limited to, the exterior and interior of the mall, all tenant spaces, and common areas, in accordance with accepted principles and practices established and prescribed by Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Bulk samples to be collected of all homogeneous materials from identified areas containing presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM). Presumed ACM will also be physically assessed for friability and condition. A homogeneous material is defined as a surfacing material, thermal system insulation (TSI), or miscellaneous material that is uniform in use, color, texture, and age of construction. All bulk samples collected will be submitted to and analyzed by an independent accredited laboratory with no affiliation to Focus or any other organization working on this project. After all laboratory results are received, a comprehensive asbestos survey report will be generated detailing all sampled material, location of samples collected, the condition of the material and the quantity of each material. The report will also include all photos of ACM materials, drawings specifically showing the areas from which the samples were collected and certifications of all personnel conducting the survey. The completed report will then be issued to Griffith and then distributed to the necessary parties involved. Once the abatement contractor receives the report, they will be responsible for submitting the necessary notifications for abatement to SCAQMD and Cal-OSHA.

In accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403, a Procedure 5 (Guidelines for Asbestos Site Clean Ups) work plan is required anytime asbestos containing material has been disturbed prior to abatement. Due to the significant damage caused to ACMs by transients and multiple fires, the interior space of the mall would fall under a required Procedure 5. Upon completing the initial survey and report, Focus will then generate a Procedure 5 work plan. The Procedure 5 work plan will Packet Pg. 743
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 5 ends

include the following: describe in detail the damaged ACM in the building, the processes for properly and safely removing all ACM, work area set up, personnel protection, proper equipment, decontamination of entire interior space, disposal, and final clearance. The Procedure 5 work plan will be submitted to the abatement contractor for review and submission to SCAQMD for approval. Any corrections or clarifications requested by SCAQMD will be handled by Focus and Janus until approval is achieved. Once approval is received from SCAQMD, Janus will begin asbestos abatement and clean-up.

Asbestos Abatement (Procedure 5)
Through our initial investigation and testing shortly after the job walk, Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC) Focus has determined that the clean-up and removal falls under SCAQMD Rule 1403 Procedure 5. Due to the existence of asbestos containing fireproofing and fire proofing debris, SCAQMD’s Procedure 5 will apply to this entire site and all materials currently within Carousel Mall. Notification to SCAQMD for asbestos work will be submitted in conjunction with the Procedure 5 work plan for SCAQMD approval at least 10 working days prior to the start of asbestos cleanup activities.

Janus will comply with SCAQMD’s Rule 1403 Procedure 1 – HEPA Filtration (negative pressure enclosures and wet removal methods) for dust control for the removal of all interior materials. If exterior non-friable materials (roofing, exterior walls, fire doors, door and window frames and sealants, etc.) are found to contain asbestos, lead, or PCBs, Environmental Engineering Controls will be erected that protects the surrounding environment from the exposure to potentially hazardous materials. Pursuant to the EPA under theNESHAP-40CFR 61 Subpart M, Fed-OSHA, 29 CFR 1926.1101, 1910.1200, CalOSHA 8 CCR 1529, 5194, and California EOA, Department of Health Services (DOHS-Title 22) Toxic Control Substances Division (TCSD), all asbestos contaminated waste materials shall be handled, transported, manifested, and disposed of in an approved landfill.

Cut & Cap Existing Utilities
It is known that all existing utilities at the Carousel Mall site have been decommissioned with the exception of the fire sprinkler system. Regardless, Griffith will investigate the existing utilities to verify that the information in the site assessment is correct. After the investigation, existing utilities will be cut and capped prior to the demolition of each structure.

Demolition
>>General
Demolition of the structure will be planned and conducted in the safest manner by experienced personnel. Documentation of pre-existing conditions will be performed prior to demolition. The material will be watered down to mitigate dust in all demolition procedures. Crews will perform all demo using 80-200K lb. class excavators, loaders, boom lifts, skid steers, and water trucks as needed. The team will continuously monitor structural integrity and make necessary adjustments as needed. Crews will leave each shift with all structural components remaining uncompromised. An hour before the end of each shift, the Project Superintendent will walk all aspects of the work and perform a survey of the conditions to confirm the structure is stable prior to crews leaving the site. Only authorized personnel with proper PPE will be allowed in the fenced areas, and the on-site security guard will make sure the site is not compromised during off hours. Items that have been noted on the plans to be protected by notifying the crew and adding visible instruments such as flagging, cones, and barricades.

Physical protection will be used as necessary which may include steel plates, k-rail, and plywood. >>Interior Soft from Structures (Soft Gut)
This process will consist of rated mechanical equipment and labor force removing and separating remaining soft/metal materials for salvage, recycling, and/or disposal. All material will be demolished, separated, and removed from the building structure. The material will be transferred to the loading area in a controlled zone and loaded into semi-trucks for removal from the site. In general, this will include the removal of stud partition walls, wall furrings, ceilings, flooring, mechanical/electrical/plumbing (MEP), and all interior fixtures. >>Existing Structures (Building Demo)
This process includes the demolition of roof, walls, upper levels, columns, beams, and supports of the structure. The procedure will be accomplished using excavators working from the highest levels to the lower levels in manageable sections. Crews will use special focus on demolition near street sides, walkways, and existing improvements that are to remain. The structure will be removed in its entirety down to the slab on grade. >>Removal of at Grade Concrete (Building Demo)
Demo and removal of existing concrete slabs on grade will consist of excavators and loaders breaking and removing concrete slabs on grade with hydraulic hammers and processors for load out. Crews will process and pulverize all concrete spoils for segregation and transport to the on-site crusher.

Packet Pg. 744
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 6 ends

>>Removal of Below Grade Concrete (Building Demo)
This process will consist of demolishing existing building foundations using excavators to dig down and expose the existing foundations. All excavations will be laid back to the existing perimeter to make excavations safe for removals, which will require some removal of the existing parking lot. Once all foundations are exposed, excavators will remove the foundations with hydraulic hammers and processors. Crews will process and pulverize all concrete spoils for segregation and transport to the on-site crusher.
>>Separation of Existing Structures
This process will be performed after soft gut is completed back to structural components and to the final limits of demolition.

This work will be performed prior to the total structure demolition and with rated mechanical equipment (bobcats and mini-excavators) and laborers from the interior of the structures. These crews will remove one bay wide of all structural components from highest levels to lowest levels, detaching exterior/interior facades and structural components from each other, creating the 100% separation for demo of the main structure. >>Disposal of Waste Materials
Materials and debris present within the structures will consist predominantly of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, wood, finishes, and structural concrete. All debris will be source separated and sent off-site for recycling with an approved haul route. Work hours for the trucking and hauling will be day shifts. The following are estimated quantities of materials that will be removed and/or disposed of.
• Trash/Solid Waste – 4,300 Tons (75% recycled) • Concrete/Asphalt - 50,000 Tons (100% recycled) Crushing
Once the demolition is complete and all rubble has been stockpiled, Griffith will mobilize our crushing operation to the site.

All existing asphalt, concrete, block, and brick will be crushed on-site and turned into aggregate base. The operation will require three to five acres, but will take place in the middle of the jobsite to ensure that it is more than 1,000 feet away from residential areas, per the City of San Bernardino Guidelines.

Earthwork
Following the demolition of the structures, Griffith will topographically map the site to understand the existing grades. At this time, we will determine whether it will be feasible to make the site grade. The crushed material that Griffith will leave on site may be used to fill in voids and pits, if necessary. Griffith will make sure that all slopes are graded at a minimum 1 to 1 for safety purposes.

Site Restoration
Once the project is complete and all contract work has been performed, the project team will complete the punch list from the City. They will remove the existing site fence and/or perimeter erosion control BMPs, if requested. In addition, the team will perform final clean-up, which will include sweeping the existing parking lots and roads.

Bond (Type B – Design Build)
Griffith Company will obtain a Type B performance and payment bond for this design-build project.

Builders Risk Insurance Policy
Griffith Company will maintain a Builders Risk Insurance Policy, including pollution liability, for this project. The policy will provide extended coverage insurance on all work, material, equipment, appliances, tools, and structures that are or will become part of the work and subject to loss or damage by fire, vandalism, and malicious mischief. The policy will cover damages in the amount of 100% of the replacement cost.

Packet Pg. 745
Section x
Title

PERSONNEL
E

E PERSONNEL
Packet Pg. 746
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 7 ends

E Key Personnel & Staffing Plan
Griffith Company
Caleb Reynoldson – Project Manager
Caleb has 10 years of experience in the management and estimation of complex heavy civil and private development projects throughout the United States. He has significant experience managing multiple stakeholders consisting of complex federal, state, and local agencies in addition to private equity entities. Caleb’s experience spans multiple disciplines, including site development, site feasibility analysis, mass earthwork operations, complex concrete structures, mining and crushing, complex dewatering and roadway construction. Caleb’s most recent alternative delivery experience includes the redevelopment of the Lake Gregory Regional Park for the County of San Bernadino. The project included organizing a JV team to include private capital, designers, constructors, and recreational operators. The project will be funded through a hybrid public-private funding model with a design-build team to transform the park over a 20-year term.

Bob Luebke – Project Superintendent
Bob has more than 30 years of experience overseeing self-performed and subcontracted project operations in the heavy civil construction market for most of Southern California’s counties, cities, and municipalities. He has select experience in managing demolition, mass excavation, rock placement, asphalt paving, and concrete paving operations. He knows the challenges that are presented when working in this area and has proven mitigation strategies and solutions to successfully deliver projects. Bob will leverage his knowledge and history to provide support to ensure successful delivery of the Project during the Construction Phase.

Ken Taylor, PE – Design Coordinator
Ken is a Design Manager with more than 30 years of experience managing and providing design services for large, complex, multidiscipline projects in Southern California, including rail and bus transit, highway/roadway, infrastructure, and parks/recreational projects. Along with preparation and oversight of hydrology and hydraulic (H&H) calculations reports, Water Quality Management Plans, and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs), he is skilled at preparing geometric approval plans; project reports; project study reports and final plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E); and Storm Water Data Reports. With 15 years of design-build and collaborative delivery experience, as a Design Coordinator, Ken coordinates with owners, stakeholders, and design consultants to make sure that quality, budget, and schedule objectives are clearly understood and met.

Danny Cortez – Site Safety Director
Danny monitors the on-site activities on multiple jobsites across Southern California to ensure that all work is conducted at the highest level of safety. He is responsible for establishing, implementing, and improving Griffith Company’s Safety Program, as well as enhancing the overall safety culture of the company. He directs and supports Site Safety Managers, Project Managers, Superintendents, and other field staff. Danny’s experience throughout Southern California will lead to a site that is safe and secure, ensuring that appropriate job hazard analysis (JHAs) are developed and understood by all personnel working on the related scope of work. He will provide oversight and additional trainings as needed to support the safe operations of the Project.

Force Demolition, Inc.

Duane Pate – Demolition Project Manager
Duane Pate is the President of Force Demolition, has over 30 years of experience in the Union demolition industry, and is the company lead in the business development, project development, estimating, project management, and administration oversight. Duane has played a role in every fashion of the demolition industry from union labor tradesman, salesman, estimating, project manager, business development, Executive Vice President, and President/Owner of Force Demolition.

Duane and his team are responsible for making Force Demolition one of the best and leading Union demolition contractors in California. He has secured, managed, and performed some of the largest and toughest, most complex demolition projects in Southern California with great success. Duane’s knowledge has proven success in the demolition sectors with projects involving shopping malls, healthcare, educational, science and technology, parking, hospitality/entertainment, retail, water/wastewater, industrial facilities, office buildings, tenant interiors, mixed-use, aviation, bridges, and highways.

Chris Dickinson – Demolition Operations Manager
Chris was born and raised in the San Bernardino Valley, started his demolition experience in the early 1980s, and has nearly four decades of demolition knowledge. Chris has mastered the understanding, knowledge, and engineering of Packet Pg. 747
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 8 ends

building demolition. Over these years he has established complex demolition strategies and skills to perform all types of building demolition with great success. Chris specializes in High Rise, Wide Rise, and High Angle structure demolition using the most up to date technologies and equipment, making it “the right tool for the right job.” To date Chris has planned, managed, overseen, and executed more than $500 million in demolition projects. His client relationships are fostered by providing cost saving solutions and professional opinions, to favor the project’s outcome. One of Chris’s greatest accomplishments is putting the time and training into his teams, so they always deliver quality and performance in the name of safety. He prioritizes the highest quality Union Workers to sustain professional crews with the most knowledgeable workers.

Billy Wade – Demolition Superintendent
Billy started in the utility underground industry and migrated into the demolition industry in 2010. Starting as a Union Laborer. While leveraging the training and experience of his co-workers, Billy excelled to foreman and then Project Superintendent in the last five years. He has been essential overseeing multiple Demolition projects and managing crews. He has earned the trust from his crews and management to execute a demolition plan safely and per the structural engineer’s requirements. Billy has completed over $100 million in demolition projects throughout California.

Robert Riddering – Demolition Safety Manager
Robert was recruited into the demolition industry in 2016 for his background in mechanical. Robert has proven to be instrumental in the high angle demolition using cranes and rigging. He has taken the training and experience on complex demolition projects to new heights with tough constraints. Starting as a Union Foreman working his way through the ranks to Project Superintendent, he has earned the respect of many and provides real solutions to critical environments. In his time as a Superintendent, Robert acquired the ability to communicate safety to crews in a way that is elementary and easy to understand. He currently is a STSC (safety trained supervisor) card holder and plays a double role as Safety Manager. In the last six years he has been involved in over $100 million in contract projects.

Janus Corporation
Kelly Gogerty – Abatement Project Manager
Kelly has been in the abatement/demolition industry for 33 years involving all aspects of project management, sales, and estimating. He has direct interaction with clients and field services to ensure the safe and timely completion of work. Kelly manages environmental compliance, safety, waste minimization, asbestos abatement, lead remediation, mold abatement, heavy metal decontamination, biohazards, and bio cumulative toxic substances throughout California. He is an expert program and project manager, with his experience managing small- and large-scale remediation projects for both public and private clients. Kelly’s hands-on approach to managing and mitigating environmental issues and hazards, gives the City of San Bernardino the expertise needed to minimize environmental risk and ensure site safety throughout the duration of the Procedure 5 abatement work.

Armando Ibarra – Abatement Operations Manager
Armando has been with Janus for 23 years. He started as a field technician requiring labor on both inside and out of containments. With this knowledge and experience he was elevated to Supervisor. This position is responsible for safety and timely completion of work. Armando was promoted to Operations Manager in 2014 and is responsible for coordination and management of all field operations.

Mike Sharp – Abatement Safety Officer
Mike is certified and accredited by California Department of Public Health (Lead Related Construction Unit), the Environmental Protection Agency (Asbestos and Lead), and Cal/OSHA (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act and Transite Pipe) as an instructor and as a Director of Training. Mike assures that hazardous material liability on projects is minimized by designing projects that emphasis safe work practices, rather than minimally legal work activities. He uses his deep and varied knowledge of hazardous materials remediation techniques to allow the Project Design Team to take advantage of the most cost-effective remediation methods available within the hazardous materials industry. Over the past 39 years, Mike has worked on numerous projects involving hazardous materials such as those that will be encountered at Carousel Mall. He has experience in designing, conducting, and overseeing hazardous materials remediation projects as a contractor conducting the removal work and as an industrial hygienist overseeing the work of others. He was an integral part in the design of hazardous material remediation and project oversight for projects such as the renovation of UC Berkeley’s 650,000 square foot Life Science Building and the demolition and replacement of the State of California Capitol Mall’s Central Utility Plant.

Packet Pg. 748
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 9 ends

Focus Environmental
Dave Camarillo – CCST Project Manager
David is the Vice President of Focus. His 28 years of experience in the environmental health and safety field has made the company what it is today. David manages all aspects of business including marketing, estimating, operations, project oversight, and technical expertise. David started in the industry as an abatement contractor supervisor. He learned all aspects of the abatement side of the industry and what was involved in carrying out large scale abatement projects. This led him to the consulting side of the business and helped create Focus. Over the years, David has conducted asbestos, lead and hazardous materials surveys, Procedure 5 work plan writing, lead-based paint inspections, microbial investigations, Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) assessments, Operations and Maintenance Programs (O&M), and asbestos and lead onsite training. David has led his team in surveys of multiple million square foot industrial and commercial properties and conducting work in multiple states.

Jacob Pulliam – CAC Project Manager
Jacob has been in the consulting field for over 15 years. He started as a field operations manager while supervising up to 13 technicians at any given time and, with increased knowledge and training, has advanced to Project Manager. His responsibilities included scheduling, report writing, Procedure 5 writing, project oversight, renovation and/or demolition survey inspections, universal waste assessment, air quality assessments, project air monitoring, final clearances for asbestos, lead and mold. His experience in managing large and small projects is an asset to Focus and he is more than qualified to handle a project of this magnitude.

Staffing Plan
Caleb Reynoldson
Project Manager1
Bob Luebke
Project
Superintendent1
Danny Cortez
Safety Manager1
Ken Taylor, PE
Design Manager1
Samuel Jacoby
Principal Engineer3
Deepansh Kathuria
Associate Principal
Engineer4
Duane Pate
Demolition Project
Manager2
Chris Dickinson
Demolition
Operations Manager2
Billy Wade
Demolition
Superintendent2
Robert Riddering
Demolition Safety
Manager2
Kelly Gogerty
Abatement Project
Manager5
Armando Ibarra
Abatement
Operations Manager5
Mike Sharp
Abatement Safety
Officer5
Dave Camarillo
CCST Project
Manager6
Jacob Pullman
CAC Project Manager6
Steven McClown
CCST Technician6
Alex Qishta
City Engineer
Legend
1 Griffith Company
2 Force Demolition
3 Cannon Corporation
4 Miyamoto International
5 Janus Corporation
6 Focus Environmental
Packet Pg. 749
Section x
Title

UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
F

F UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
Packet Pg. 750
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 10 ends

F Understanding of Project
Project Design Description
The Carousel Mall that will be demolished as part of this Project, was originally constructed in 1972. Per the project walk and site assessment created by Ninyo & Moore, the demolition limits of work consist of a two-story internal mall building with numerous tenant spaces located on the first and second floors of the shopping mall. Attached to the West-central portion of the site is a two-story building that used to be the Montgomery Ward Department store and attached to the north central portion was another two-story building that was the former JC Penny department store. There is a single-story building with a basement on the northwest portion of the site which was formerly occupied by the Montgomery Ward Service Center and west of that is a one-story standalone structure that was the former Firestone Service Center. To the north is also another two-story structure that had multiple uses throughout the years. The northeast portion of the site has a three-level parking structure that will stay in place along with the existing parking lots, paved roads and landscaping that surround the mall. The existing utility services were all shut off in 2017, except for the fire sprinkler system in case of a fire emergency.

Griffith has partnered with Cannon Corporation (Cannon) to perform the design for the Project. Cannon, with the help of our Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD), will create a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) detailing the site assessment, erosion and sediment control BMPs, good housekeeping measures, post construction BMPs, inspections, and record keeping for the Project. Cannon will also create a site plan detailing ingress and egress locations, site fencing, demolition limits, and grading contours. The demolition plan will show the limits of demolition. There are currently no as-builts that can be used for this design information, so once the site has been demolished, Griffith will survey the site to obtain the existing site contours. Once this information is obtained, we will finalize our contours to maximize site drainage without ponding areas forming. There are two catch basins on the South side of the mall, and we anticipate using these for drainage. We will maintain existing drainage patterns without diversions to other watersheds or storm drain systems in order to ensure that the capacity of the existing storm drain system is not compromised.

In 1972 when the Carousel Mall was built, there were already two existing structures on the property. One structure is the Harris Building that was originally constructed in the 1950s and the other structure is the Enterprise Building that was built in 1927. It is understood that both of these structures are to remain. In addition to these two buildings, there are two pedestrian bridges that go from the existing parking structure into the second story of the mall and one other pedestrian bridge that comes from E Street and leads into the mall. Once the contract for the Project is executed, Griffith will immediately begin exploratory investigation to understand the structural components of the structures that are to remain. This investigation will include potholing and selective demolition to determine items like existing materials, foundation sizes, and beams.

Miyamoto, our structural engineer, will take the information collected from the investigation and provide structural analysis for the demolition near each of the five locations noted. The analysis will include the determination for the structural stability after the adjacent structures are removed. Griffith will also coordinate with the structural engineer to ensure that our means and methods comply with the analysis. During the select demolition of these four areas we will monitor noise and vibration to adhere to local regulations. Once the building is removed, we will then close the doorway and windows to the Harris Building by using wood framing and water tight building materials.

In 2013, Force performed the demolition of an existing five-story building that was joined with an adjacent mall building. The demolition of this structure was unique because similar to the Harris Building and The Enterprise Building on the Carousel Mall project, the structure was joined to the historic Balboa Theater, Citi Bank buildings, and the main viaduct bridge that connected the mall.

After the structural analysis was performed on this project, Force worked directly with the engineer to establish a work plan that would keep the existing historical buildings and bridge structure intact while demolishing this existing five-story with basement structure. This work plan included a fully engineered demolition work plan that showed the separation of the structure from the buildings that were to remain. The structure was ultimately demolished with no damage to the existing buildings or the pedestrian bridge and the owner was pleased.

Link to the time lapse
of the demolition of
a five-story building
adjacent to a mall
building
Packet Pg. 751
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 11 ends

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Pre-Construction 75 days Thu 9/29/22 Wed 1/11/23
2 Bid Due Date 0 days Thu 9/29/22 Thu 9/29/22
3 Contract 15 days Thu 9/29/22 Wed 10/19/22
4 Design 60 days Thu 10/20/22Wed 1/11/23
5 Asbestos Survey 30 days Thu 10/20/22Wed 11/30/22
6 Procedure 5 Submittal and Approval by SCAQMD 20 days Thu 12/1/22 Wed 12/28/22 7 Structural Investigation 5 days Thu 10/20/22Wed 10/26/22 8 Structural Analysis 15 days Thu 10/27/22Wed 11/16/22
9 Construction 198 days Tue 1/3/23 Thu 10/5/23
10 Notice to Proceed 0 days Tue 1/3/23 Tue 1/3/23
11 Site Preparation 6 days Tue 1/3/23 Tue 1/10/23
12 SWPPP 4 days Wed 1/11/23Mon 1/16/23
13 Asbestos / Hazardous Abatement 132 days Tue 1/17/23 Wed 7/19/23 14 Demolition AQMD Notification 10 days Thu 2/16/23 Wed 3/1/23 15 Structural Demolition 130 days Thu 3/2/23 Wed 8/30/23 16 Close off Building & Bridges 10 days Thu 8/31/23 Wed 9/13/23 17 Material Crushing 25 days Thu 8/10/23 Wed 9/13/23
18 Earthwork 12 days Thu 9/14/23 Fri 9/29/23
19 Punchlist 3 days Mon 10/2/23Wed 10/4/23
20 Final Cleanup 1 day Thu 10/5/23 Thu 10/5/23
21 Substantial Completion 0 days Thu 10/5/23 Thu 10/5/23 9/29
1/3
10/5
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Qtr 4, 2022 Qtr 1, 2023 Qtr 2, 2023 Qtr 3, 2023 Qtr 4, 2023 Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Progress
Manual Progress
City of San Bernardino
Carousel Mall Demolition

Page 1 ends

Project: Schedule
Date: Mon 9/26/22
City of San Bernardino
Carousel Mall Demolition
Packet Pg. 752
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 12 ends

Project Compliance with Minimum Program and Performance Requirements
Griffith and the project team will perform the demolition and abatement for the carousel mall in compliance with all requirements of the request for proposal (RFP), with the contract specifications, and with applicable regulatory agency rules and regulations. The key to a successful Project Compliance Program and Performance Plan is the active evaluation and documentation of the quality of work on the project by designated members of the project team throughout the duration of the Project. Opportunities for implementing the quality control plan include submittal reviews, site inspections, daily communication, and timely correction of items that do not conform to the contract requirements. Hazardous materials encountered on this Project will include:
• Asbestos
• Silica
• Lead containing paints, coatings and materials
Hazardous materials that may be encountered on this Project include:
• Refrigerant gases (such as Freon)
• PCBs
• Mercury (light tube and electrical switches)
• Radioactive smoke alarms and exit signs
• Hexavalent chromium in concrete
• Other potentially hazardous materials
All work on this Project will comply with project specifications and with all applicable Federal, State, and local regulatory agencies’ rules and regulations. The most prominent of these include:
• Federal EPA Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA) • California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) • California Department of Safety and Health (DOSH)
• California Department of Public Health (CDPH) - Title 17 Lead Related Construction • California Department of Public Health’s Title 22 – Hazardous Waste Management • Cal-OSHA Hazardous Substance List
• South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) Rule 1403 and Procedure 5 Compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Rule 1403 The Carousel Mall Project is mainly a demolition and asbestos clean-up project. Notification to SCAQMD for asbestos work will be submitted and the associated fee paid within 10 working days prior to the start of asbestos clean-up activities. Demolition of the Mall structure(s) will be conducted by Force Demolition and will require separate notification to SCAQMD. This demolition notification will require a copy of the asbestos survey and a report showing that all asbestoscontaining materials have been removed from the structure(s). The survey and the certification that all asbestos materials have been removed will be generated by Focus.

Dust Mitigation/Suppression
During phases of the demolition activities, airborne dust emissions will be controlled. Dust suppression will be implemented throughout the interior and exterior work areas to minimize or reduce the generation of visible dust emissions. Engineering controls for dust suppression will generally consist of the use of water misting and spraying devices (fire hose). Dust suppression via water misting and spraying will use a quantity of water that will be enough to control dust, but not enough to leave residual water accumulations on the ground surface. Water misting and spraying devices will be utilized as necessary in various portions of the work zone and will assist in reducing visible dust emissions in work areas. Work procedures and/or dust controls will be adjusted as needed to ensure that visible dust is controlled at the site boundary.

Dust suppression will continue during loading of rubble with water mist as needed and loaded trucks will be covered when they leave the site.

Standard operating procedures for demolition shall apply; however, on-site personnel will constantly monitor all activities with regards to this specific section and will immediately implement any necessary engineering controls or physical barriers.

It is a project goal to minimize and control any visible dust emissions from the demolition activities and this will be accomplished by the following:
• Prohibit any demolition when wind speeds exceed 20 mph • Apply water during and after demolition activities
• Limit construction activity/trucking to designated loading areas Packet Pg. 753
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 13 ends

• Limit on site vehicle speeds to less than 15 mph
• Apply water/street sweepings as needed to construction site and roadways • Tarp dump trucks when leaving the site
Griffith’s abatement contractor, Janus, will comply with SCAQMD’s Rule 1403’s Procedure 1 – HEPA Filtration (negative pressure enclosures and wet removal methods) for dust control for the removal of all interior materials. If exterior nonfriable materials (roofing, exterior walls, fire doors, door and window frames and sealants, etc.) are found to contain asbestos, lead or PCBs, containment will be erected that protects the surrounding environment from the exposure to potentially hazardous materials.

Compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Procedure 5 Due to the existence of asbestos containing fireproofing and fire proofing debris, SCAQMD’s Procedure 5 – Guidelines for Asbestos Site Clean Ups will apply to this entire site and all materials currently within Carousel Mall. SCAQMD’s Procedure 5 rule requires a work plan for the asbestos cleanup to be designed by a Cal/OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC) and it will be based on our thorough asbestos survey created by Focus Environmental.

Procedure 5 Clean-up Plans are required to include:
• Scope of the overall project
• Asbestos material(s) at the site, its condition, type, amount, and specific location(s) within the site • Abatement project stages
• Provisions for site preparation and control, prevention of contamination migration, include ingress/egress zones • Engineering work practices and asbestos emission controls • Procedures for work area clean-up and/or decontamination after bulk removal • Provisions for handling, storing, transporting, and disposing of the asbestos containing waste • Air monitoring type(s) and clearance level to be achieved, and • Type and amount of asbestos remaining on site (if any) to be removed or managed in place and by whom • Reference to, and recommended disposition of, asbestos-contaminated contents/property • Numerous Attachments as in the Procedure 5 Guidelines http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/compliance/ Asbestos-Demolition-/procedure5_guidelineDC2E0081F4B7.doc Janus has a CAC on staff (Mike Sharp, Senior Safety Officer) who will write the Procedure 5 work plan. However, Janus is not able to conduct the survey itself, as this is a conflict of interest according to Cal-OSHA and California Business and Professional Code. Once a complete and through survey has been conducted by Focus, Janus will work with the Focus to assure the Procedure 5 plan is sufficient for regulatory compliance, safe for workers and the environment, fits within the project calendar, and is cost effective.

Noise Mitigation
Noise will be monitored but is not expected to be a significant issue for this project. Demolition activities in general involve heavy equipment operations, including bobcats, excavators, loaders, and dump trucks. Additional noise includes the removal and processing of structural components. The project team will conduct all these operations during approved work times and City of San Bernardino guidelines. The project team will ensure that crushing is more than 1,000 feet away from any residential areas. Griffith will survey the work areas continuously and address any excessive noise concerns. Additional measures to control noise will include:
• Shutting off and eliminating idle equipment when not in continuous use • Engineering controls, if needed
Cal-OSHA Compliance
All work conducted by Griffith Company and its sub tiers will conform to, and likely exceed, the requirements of Cal-OSHA for the hazardous materials encountered on this Project, including but not limited to:
• 8 CCR 1529 Asbestos in Construction
• 8 CCR 1532.1 Lead in Construction
• 8 CCR 1532.3 Silica
• 8 CCR 339 The Hazardous Substance List
• 8 CCR Table AC-1 Permissible Exposure Limits For Chemical Contaminants Due to the fireproofing debris throughout the building, interior cleanup and asbestos abatement work will be considered Class I asbestos work. Cal-OSHA Class I Asbestos Work requires:

Packet Pg. 754
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 14 ends

• Powered Air Purifying Respirators
• Disposable Coveralls
• Showers
• Critical Barriers
• Negative Pressure Enclosures
• Wet removal methods
• Disposal of waste as both regulated waste on a
Federal EPA basis and hazardous waste on California
Department of Toxic Substance Control basis
• No visible emissions of dust
Conducting work under Class I asbestos abatement activity requirements will protect the workers and the environment from other particulate matter exposures, such as lead, silica, hexavalent chromium, and other heavy metals.

Once the environmental survey is completed – respirator cartridges (perhaps stacked with HEPA and Gas filters) and level of disposable coveralls (paper, Tyvek, chemical, etc.) will be modified to assure workers are protected from all existing hazards.

Per 8 CCR Title 22, waste profiling for content levels of all known contaminants that could cause a waste to be hazardous will be conducted once waste streams have been segregated.

Life Cycle Cost
Although life cycle costs are typically calculated for construction projects, there are some for the demolition of the Carousel Mall project. One to note is the use of the on-site crushing operation. When the demolition is complete, and the foundation and slabs have been removed, Griffith foresees somewhat of a pit that will need to be filled. Utilizing the on-site crushing will leave aggregate base on-site for Griffith to fill this pit and on-site voids with. This will ensure that the City of San Bernardino does not have to import material to make the site grade. This will aid in leaving the site in a safe manner when the contractor has completed all contract work. Another life cycle cost that the owner will benefit from is the materials that will be utilized for closing the openings in the Harris building and the pedestrian bridges. The openings in the Harris building will be closed off by wood framing, waterproofing, stucco on the outside, and drywall on the inside.

After the pedestrian bridges are removed, the existing exposed steel for the parking structure will be sand blasted and covered in high performance coating. After that, we will apply reinforcing mesh with a layer of stucco to match the existing structure. By closing these areas properly, the structures will remain water tight, improving their life span for the City of San Bernardino.

Value-Added Enhancements
Safety
Safety is the number one priority for Griffith and our subcontractors on the Carousel Mall Demolition Project. Griffith’s EMR rating is 0.78 which is 22% lower than the industry average. We understand that there are many different safety risks related to the Project that stem from demolition operations and general construction incidents. We will eliminate and mitigate those risks with our best-in-class safety program. The safety program, developed by Safety Manager Danny Cortez, will incorporate a combination of industry best practices and real people dynamically devising industry-first methods to solve age old construction challenges. The program will focus heavily on task risk assessments, behavioral safety, regular and frequent safety communication, and regulatory safety audits, measuring field supervisors’ engagement with each of these critical safety activities and providing them feedback on performance. Griffith recognizes that a culture of safety will drive success and through continuous communication and coordination, the Carousel Mall Project will exceed expectations.

Danny’s 25 years of experience on complex civil infrastructure projects ensures that our quality and level of production in the field will be delivered with the highest level of safety on the project. Danny knows that project planning must revolve around the needs of safety for the construction crews. Danny is a Construction Health and Safety Technician (CHST), currently certified through the Board of Certified Safety Professionals, the gold standard of safety certification across the globe. He has led the safety program on multiple design build and alternative delivery projects with strict guidelines for safety, providing training for all employees, subcontractors, vendors, and stakeholders that enter the construction site.

Design-Build Experience
Griffith has constructed more than one billion dollars’ worth of projects that involve alternative delivery, such as CMGC, CMAR and design build. A few to name were our $606 million high-speed rail project and our $258 million LAWA Utility and Landside Access Modernization Program Enabling Project (LULEP). In addition to the underground utility and roadway improvements on the LULEP project, Griffith was tasked with demolishing Manchester Square at LAX. This portion of the project consisted of the demolition of a 125-acre site in preparation for the LAX Consolidated Rent-A-Car Facility (Conrac).

The site demolition consisted of 40+ buildings, including a hospital, school and gas station. This project was very unique and Griffith had to coordinate with multiple agencies for permitting and design, including Los Angeles World Airports, the Packet Pg. 755
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 15 ends

City of Los Angeles, LA Bureau of Engineering, SoCal Edison, and many other third-party utility agencies.

Through our previous experience in design build projects, Griffith has found that identifying and managing risk is the key to success. On every project, risks must be identified early, regularly evaluated, reasonably quantified, and systematically avoided. A fundamental component of a design build is identifying and effectively managing potential project risks during design development, thereby eliminating risk or implementing cost-effective mitigation plans. Our process has four fundamental, proactive principles:

1. Well-defined organization and proven processes are required to identify and manage risk

2. Acting fast and early has the most influence on the elimination or mitigation of risk

3. Identified risks need to be assigned champions, responsible for management in both design and construction

4. Allocation of contingencies or pricing of risk is considered a last resort To help coordinate and manage these design efforts, Griffith has an in-house design manager. Ken Taylor will bring value to this project with his 30 years of experience managing and providing design services for large complex projects throughout Southern California. Ken will help coordinate and lead the design efforts and provide value through his industry knowledge with a hands-on approach with the design team. Ken has aided in Griffith Company’s design build project success by bridging the gap between the contractor and designer.

Griffith’s previous experience with design build projects will bring value to the City of San Bernardino. They have the capacity and project management staff to manage the design and demolition of the Carousel Mall Demolition project.

Contaminated Soils
In review of the site assessment, it is understood that the Carousel Mall may have soil that is characterized as contaminated and/or hazardous. Contaminated soils compromise cost, schedule, and, most importantly, safety. Griffith has an inhouse environmental division that is composed of highly trained field technicians and professionals including engineers, geologists, and certified industrial hygienists, all trained per HAZWOPER following 29 CFR Part 1910 120. This division understands all hazardous waste regulations at the federal, state, and local agency levels and will take an in-house approach to characterizing soils for re-use or disposal. In turn, this will provide the City of San Bernardino with the most cost-effective solutions and long-term liability protection when these soils are encountered.

Experience in Selective Demolition
As previously stated, one of the most critical aspects of this project is demolishing the Carousel Mall structure that abuts up to other Historical buildings that are to remain. Force Demolition has a long history of working on Complex projects where critical structures remain during demolition. These projects include the demolition of Tom Bradley Terminal, Horton Plaza, Shops at Carlsbad, UCLA Medical center, Providence Tarzana, LAX Delta Airlines, American Airlines, and the People Mover project. All of these projects had critical separation of building structures that remained during demolition. The Horton Plaza was a project in San Diego at the Westfield Mall. The scope of work included the demolition and removal of the existing Horton Plaza that was next to the Balboa Theatre and the City Bank building structures. The existing Balboa Theatre shared a basement wall with the Horton Plaza building and the City Bank shared an entire side of its structure with the building. Force crews were able to successfully remove the Horton Plaza structure leaving the other two buildings completely intact. Having Force Demolition adds value to the City of San Bernardino for this project because of the knowledge and experience that they have demolishing similar structures.

In-House Crushing Operation
Griffith has an in-house crushing division and owns two mobile crushers that are FAA certified. The division mobilizes these crushers to construction projects all over Southern California and also has sites in Irvine and Riverside, CA. The crushing operation takes broken asphalt, concrete, block and brick and turns the materials into crushed miscellaneous base and class II base. The crushing machines emit relatively no dust during the operation due to water sprayers located on each material conveyor. There are also means of noise suppression, such as sound walls, to help reduce noise that comes from the operation. Griffith’s crushing operation will bring value to the Carousel Mall Demolition because it will limit the amount of material that will need to be hauled off, which will reduce cost for the City of San Bernardino. This creates a more sustainable option for the City of San Bernardino, in lieu of hauling the concrete to a landfill. Demolition of the mall and mall basements may also leave voids that must be filled for the site to drain properly. By crushing the material onsite, the operation may leave enough material to help fill those voids.

Schematic Drawings
Please see Appendix #2.

Packet Pg. 756
Section x
Title

REFERENCES

G G REFERENCES
Packet Pg. 757
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 16 ends

G References
LAWA Utility and Landside Access Modernization Program
Enabling Project (LULEP) Los Angeles, CA
Owner: Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA)
Contact: Daniel McKelvie, [email protected], 310-846-3156 Value: $258 Million
Key challenges of this project with a similar delivery method included coordinating with multiple project participants for on schedule delivery. Griffith partnered with the lead designer and LAWA to develop best practices for project delivery. As the first CM/GC project for LAWA, Griffith focused on integrating the teams and implementing procedures. With a team of 45 Griffith team personnel, 20 design consultant personnel, and 30 LAWA members, Griffith promoted team cohesion to advance the design, perform constructability and design reviews, obtain permits, negotiate the projects, and perform the work. The team met daily with LAWA and various stakeholders to maintain progress, overcome challenges, and develop best practices. The project was completed on schedule, which enabled the LAMP projects to begin as planned. Staffing and organization to meet critical milestones was crucial. Seven contract phases required on-time completion to eliminate impacts to follow-on projects. At any given time, there were over a dozen projects under development, each with a team to provide continuity in management, design development, phasing, cost, and overall approach. The team was organized into various departments - design, pre-construction, logistics, and program support - and dedicated four schedulers, multiple project managers, dozens of subcontractors, and more than 150 on-site non-craft team members to deliver the project.

This program completed 38 different projects over three years. LULEP was integral in preparing the Central Terminal Area (CTA), as well as several surrounding roadways and project sites, for construction of the Automated People Mover (APM), Consolidated Rent-a-Car (ConRAC), Intermodal Transportation Facilities (ITF), and new roadways. Key projects include:
• Underground duct bank relocations and installations, which will help power the new facilities • Relocation of Avis and the Metro City Bus Plaza, which was needed to start construction of LAX’s new mobility hub - ITF West
• Shoofly on Aviation Boulevard, which helps maintain traffic between Century Boulevard and Arbor Vitae Street during heavy construction of the APM system
California High-Speed Rail Package 4 Design-Build Wasco, CA Owner: California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA)
Contact: Elia Mahfoud, PE, Director of Infrastructure Delivery, [email protected], 559-284-2178 Value: $606 Million
The project, delivered under a design-build contract, has a 30% Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal. The team has exceeded participation with 134 contracts to more than 90 DBE firms. More than $124 million has been committed to DBE firms in the delivery of this project. High-speed rail requires structural engineering to handle the stress incurred by the structures when the trains cross and design tolerances to ensure a smooth and safe ride. Griffith’s design and construction methodologies addressed these constraints and minimized earthwork and impacts to adjacent facilities and utilities. Advanced investigations further enabled the team to reduce environmental impacts, maximize mobility across the alignment, and improve ride quality. A change to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) permit requirements delayed clearing of the right-of-way (ROW) of sensitive species, prompted rewriting of the applicable environmental plans, and necessitated a resubmission for approvals. Several of these species were only present seasonally, limiting when biological surveys could be completed, causing work delays on affected sections. The team advanced biological clearing operations and maintained active construction along extended lengths to prevent the need to re-survey.

Construction Package 4 (CP4) is the third design-build construction contract for the California High-Speed Rail project, consisting of a 22-mile segment in the City of Wasco from the northern terminus near the Tulare-Kern County line to the southern terminus near the City of Shafter. The project consists of:
• Clearing and Demolition of existing parcels in ROW
• At-grade, retained fill and aerial rail sections
• 14 structures - overpasses, underpasses, and viaducts, including an elevated pergola structure for the rail
alignment more than 2,000 feet long
• Relocation and re-purposing existing BNSF tracks
• Reconstruction of selected roadways
• Creating waterway and wildlife crossings
Packet Pg. 758
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 17 ends

American Airlines Terminal 4 & 5 Renovation LAX Head House Demolition Project Los Angeles, CA
Project Owner: American Airlines/Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) Contact: Scott Slater, [email protected], 951-532-1888 Project Value: $7.5 Million
Selective demolition of existing apron and interior removals at Terminal 4/5 for preparation of total demolition of headhouse and concourse terminals. Selective demolition of approx. 70,000 sq/ft of AOA taxiways at Terminals 4/5 for new installation of utilities and new trailer compound areas. Selective demolition removals for PBB reconfigurations.

Demolition of the existing 5-story Terminal 4 Headhouse Building Structure approx.200,000 sq/ft. in its entirety at active airport.

Demolition of Flour Tower Los Angeles, CA
Project Owner: University of Southern California/Hamilton Construction Company Contact: Bruce Mills, [email protected],
909-208-1548
Project Value: $2.9 Million
Total abatement and demolition of existing 12-story concrete building structure in the heart of the USC campus. Demolition operations had us performing the demolition of this structure within feet of other building structures to remain operational throughout abatement and demolition operations.

OIAA Northwest Quadrant Demolition Ontario, CA
Project Owner: Ontario International Airport Authority
Contact: Keith Owens, 909-544-5383, [email protected] Project Value: $4.4 Million
This project consisted of the demolition of 51 acres of land that was composed of hangars, buildings, asphalt, airfield pavement, and fencing at Ontario Airport.

Griffith Company added value to this project by utilizing our in-house portable crushing operation. The project team crushed over 50K tons of asphalt and concrete and left the aggregate base material for the airport to utilize on future airfield improvement projects. The Griffith owned crushing machines emit relatively no dust during the operation due to water sprayers located on each material conveyor. The airport was pleased with the operation that was conducted inside the AOA fence.

Services Provided by your Firm (list): The scope of work for this project consisted of demolition and rough grading of an approximately fifty-one (51) acre parcel in the northwest quadrant of the OIAA property. The parcel included both landside elements to the North and airside elements to the South. The demolition scope consisted of clearing and grubbing, the removal of three existing hangar buildings, asphalt pavement, concrete pavement, chain link fencing, and above and below ground utilities. Work also included the relocation of an existing Airport Operations Area (AOA) secured fencing and vehicle service road. The site also had to be rough graded to drain at the conclusion of the project.

General Construction:
• Ontario Airport coordination
• Permits and agency coordination
• Maintenance of traffic, detours, and flaggers
• FOD and dust control and sweeping
• Security escort services
• Temporary and Permanent barricades, fencing, lighting, signage, and markings
• Temporary drainage, erosion control and SWPPP
Demolition Scope:
• Demolition of hangars and buildings
• Asphalt and concrete removal and disposal
• Clearing and grubbing removal and disposal
• Grading areas to rough grade elevations
• Removal of gas, sewer, water, electrical, irrigation, storm drain structures, conduits and piping
• Removal of chain link fencing
• Installation of temporary barrier
• Installation of Airport Operations Area (AOA) secured fencing
• Paving and striping temporary vehicle service road
Packet Pg. 759
Section x
Title

LIST OF REPRESENTATIVE

PROJECTS
H

H LIST OF REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
Packet Pg. 760
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 18 ends

H Representative Projects
Project Owner Value Completion Scope of Work
Griffith Company
LAWA Utilities & LAMP
Enabling Projects (DesignBuild/CMGC)
LAWA $258 M 05/2020 Demolished 125 acre site with 40+
buildings
California High Speed Rail
Project (Design-Build)
CHSRA $606 M 90% Demolition and clearing of parcels,
earthwork, 14 structures, relocating RR
tracks, reconstructing roadways
Universal City Pedestrian Bridge
(Design-Build)
Los Angeles County, MTA $24.7 M 04/2018 Demolition, roadway work, pedestrian bridge
Park to Playa Pedestrian Bridge
(Design-Build)
Los Angeles County,
DPW
$8.7 M 09/2018 Demolition, roadway work, pedestrian
bridge
Mountain View Avenue
Widening (Design-Build/
CMGC)
Inland Valley
Development Agency
$13.4 M 07/2021 Demolition and construction of
overpass bridge
Qantas Hangar Demolition
Project
Los Angeles World
Airports
$16.3 M 12/2016 Demolition of Qantas Hangar 3,
associated buildings, environmental
abatement, and removal of
contaminated soil
Northwest Quadrant Demolition
Project
Ontario International
Airport
$4.4 M 11/2020 Demolish three hangars & 1 million SF
of airfield pavement
SBX E Street Construction
Project
Omnitrans $79.6 M 03/2014 Roadway improvements
Pier E Container YardIntermodal Port of Long Beach $166 M 06/2021 Demolition, earthwork, construction of buildings, 11-container stacking rows
for Port terminal
San Pedro Waterfront - Berths
74-84
The Port of Los Angeles $33.6 M 10/2021 1.9 acre, 30-foot wide public promenade and 4 acre town square
South Milliken Avenue Grade
Separation
City of Ontario $45.6 M 06/2018 Grade separation
I-15-from 7th to Sierra Caltrans $77.3 M 07/2013 Highway improvements Universal Hollywood Drive NBC Universal $23.3 M 05/2017 Demolition, clear and grubbing, grading and excavation
Harbor UCLA Make-Ready
Ductbank & Parking Lots
Abbott Construction $16.1 M 10/2022 Demolition, earthwork and grading, concrete and paving, wet utilities
West Colton Intermodal Facility K-Five Construction
Corporation
$5.5 M 04/2021 Demolition, grading, wet utilities,
electrical, asphalt paving and striping
Valley View Ave. Grade
Separation
City of Santa Fe Springs $27.5 M 10/2015 Demolition, roadway work, railroad bridge
Force Demolition
Terminal 4 & 5 Renovation American Airlines/LAWA $7.5 M 07/2022 Demolition of Terminal 5-story Building Flour Tower Demolition USC $2.9 M 08/2022 Demolition of 12-story Building Santa Monica High School Santa Monica SD $2.7 M 08/2021 Demolition of 5 each 2-story Buildings LAX People Mover LAWA $13.3 M 07/2021 Demolition of 15 each Buildings Kaiser Anahiem Kaiser Permenete $4.1 M 03/2016 Demolition of 9-story Hospital Tower Packet Pg. 761
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 19 ends

Project Owner Value Completion Scope of Work
Tom Bradley International
Terminal
Los Angeles World
Airport
$13.2 M 10/2014 Demolition of entire Tom Bradley
terminals
UCLA Medical Center UCLA $3.1 M 01/2013 Demolition of 12-story Hospital Tower Horton Plaza Westfield Mall $2.8 M 06/2013 Demolition of 5-story Mall Building LAUSD Crenshaw High School LAUSD $3.3 M 11/2020 Demolition of 3 each 2-story Buildings The Village at USC USC $2.98 M 01/2015 Demolition of 12 each Buildings Firestone Tire Plant LACCD $5.1 M 06/2022 Demolition of tire plant Janus Corporation
China Basin Seismic Upgrades SPF China Basin Holdings $2.3 M 08/02021 Demo/Abatement Marriot SF CCMH Moscone LLC $4.7 M 06/2019 Demo/Abatement Parker Center City of Los Angeles $1.8 M 05/2019 Demo/Abatement Clementina Tower Clementina Towers LP $1.7 M 10/2018 Demo/Abatement Visitacion Valley Middle School San Francisco USD $1.1 M 10/2016 Demo/Abatement Alemany Housing Alemany Housing LP $1.4 M 07/2018 Demo/Abatement College of the Desert Desert CC $1.7 M 05/2019 Demo/Abatement Focus Environmental
Valley Generating Station LADWP/Worley Parsons $420,000 08/2019 Hazardous Demo Survey Haynes Generating Station LADWP/Worley Parsons $425,850 10/2017 Hazardous Demo Survey N. Main St Demo in L.A. Brine LP/Decro Corp $25,500 06/2021 Comprehensive Survey PVHMC Pomona Valley Hospital $145,000 As Needed Hazardous Survey Various County Buildings L.A. County $175,000 As Needed Hazardous Survey Various Properties XEBEC $225,000 As Needed Hazardous Demo Survey Various USPS offices USPS/Lindseth Const $120,000 As Needed Hazardous Survey Queen Mary City of Long Beach $45,000 10/2018 Hazardous Survey Griffith Company’s crushing
Griffith’s team performed demotion as and recycle operations part of the LULEP design-build/CMGC
at LAX
Griffith has a strong presence in the
Inland Empire. The firm performed the
grade separation at Miliken Avenue in
Ontario
Packet Pg. 762
Section x
Title

PROPOSAL FORM
I

I PROPOSAL FORM
Packet Pg. 763
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 1 ends

See Envelope Two for the fee proposal.

Packet Pg. 764
Section x
Title

REQUIRED FORMS
J

J REQUIRED FORMS
Packet Pg. 765
Packet Pg. 766
Packet Pg. 767
Packet Pg. 768
Packet Pg. 769
Packet Pg. 770
Section x
Title

APPENDIX

1. Resumes

2. Work Plan

3. Hazardous Assessment

APPENDIX
Packet Pg. 771
Resumes
1 Packet Pg. 772
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 1 ends

Caleb Reynoldson
Project Manager
Griffith Company - Brea, CA
Project Manager: Directly responsible for the full-cycle management and estimation of $29 Million self-performed and subcontracted revenue. Direct supervision of project engineers, superintendents and foremen. CPM scheduling, short-interval scheduling, budget management and allocation, establish schedule of values, subcontract negotiation, review and create accounting reports, review weekly and monthly costs, prepare monthly and quarterly forecasts for executive management review, lead change order estimation and negotiation, prepare large submittal packages, document control.

RockForce Construction – Lake Forest, CA
Project Manager/Business Development/Estimator: Key member during startup phase of the company. Integral member leading company revenue growth fivefold over three years. Estimated over $100M worth of heavy civil and site development projects. Directly responsible for the full-cycle management and estimation of $ 30 Million selfperformed and subcontracted revenue spanning 3 projects. Direct supervision of project engineers, superintendents and foremen. CPM scheduling, short-interval scheduling, budget management and allocation, establish schedule of values, subcontract negotiation, review and create accounting reports, review weekly and monthly costs, prepare monthly and quarterly forecasts for executive management review, lead change order estimation and negotiation, prepare large submittal packages, document control using Procore software. • Lake Gregory Dam Rehabilitation - $13.3M: Estimate and Manage a 100 foot tall DSOD jurisdictional zoned embankment.
• Cactus Basins 4 and 5 - $19.5M: Estimate and Manage a new flood control dam to include 6,000 CY of structural concrete, 1.1 million cubic yards of earthwork, 3,000 LF of HDPE pipe, 800,000 CY of sand and gravel mining/export. • Whitewater Erosion Structure Repairs $3.6M: Estimated project to include structure excavation, river diversion, placement of grouted 8 ton & 1 ton rip rap, site restoration. • I-10 Whitewater Bridge Seismic Retrofit: Managed seismic retrofit of an existing Caltrans bridge, 36” CIDH, structural backfill, 15,000 CY 2 ton rip rap.

Skanska USA Civil West - Riverside, CA
Project Controls: Responsible for the overall financial reporting and forecasting, change management, scheduling, document control and project administration.

Phillips & Jordan. - Houston, TX
Project Engineer (Assistant Project Manager): Directly responsible for the full-cycle management of $ 65 Million selfperformed and subcontracted revenue on a $174 million project. Direct supervision of one cost engineer and several field supervisors. CPM scheduling, short-interval scheduling, budget management and allocation, establish schedule of values, subcontract negotiation, review and create Spectrum accounting reports, review weekly and monthly costs, prepare monthly and quarterly forecasts for executive management review, lead change order estimation and negotiation, prepare large submittal packages, document control using Procore software. • Lane City Reservoir - $174M: Project Management of a 12 million cubic yard earthen zoned embankment.

Pulice Construction, Inc a Dragados USA Subsidiary. - Perris, CA Quality Control Manager/Project Engineer: Manage quality control systems, manage crushing plant production, subcontract management, submittals, correspondence letters, RFIs, change orders, equipment procurement, materials procurement, daily unit costs, timecards, cost coding, monthly pay apps, revenue forecasts, quarterly revenue projections, scheduling, estimating.
• Perris Dam Remediation: QC Management for an $80M seismic retrofit of an existing earthen embankment dam.

Years of Experience: 14
Years with Griffith: 2
Education:

Studies in Business and
Construction Management,
California Baptist University
Certifications:

AGC San Diego - USACE/
NAVFAC Construction Quality
Management for Contractors
Packet Pg. 773
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 2 ends

Vali Cooper & Associates. - Riverside, CA
Construction Inspector: Monitor and Inspect contractors work for compliance with contract documents and project specifications on a $130 million water resources program. Prepare daily field reports and communicate field observations with contractor, CM team and client. Prepare field quantities and as-built drawings.

Kleinfelder, Inc. - San Diego, CA
Construction Inspector/Engineering Technician: Monitor and Inspect contractors work for compliance with contract documents and project specifications on the $200 million San Vicente Dam Raise Project. Prepare daily field reports and communicate field observations with contractor, CM team and client.

Packet Pg. 774
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 3 ends

Robert Luebke
Superintendent
Soto Street Bridge – Current
The Soto Street Bridge crossing is currently a grade-separated structure carrying a four-lane roadway over Valley Boulevard and three Union Pacific Railroad tracks. The city proposes to widen the west side of the bridge. The abandoned existing Pacific Electric Railway Bridge 30-feet west of and parallels the bridge will be demolished. Rehabilitation of the Soto Bridge, the bridge deck will be repaired and widened by approximately 25 feet to 79 feet and approach the roadway. The existing curb barriers and sidewalks will be replaced with architectural barriers, wider sidewalks, and shoulders on both sides of the bridge.

The roadway beyond the bridge approach will be widened to provide standard street width.

Aqua Hedionda – Current
This project replaced a segment of critical infrastructure in Carlsbad that conveys wastewater to the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility. The project improvements included the construction of a 140’ long prefabricated steel truss bridge; 33 MGD wastewater lift station; installation of pipe sizes 18” to 54” and approximately 8,300 LF; 4,000 LF of 36-inch sewer force main pipeline; 6,900 LF 54-inch gravity sewer pipeline; 11,000 LF of recycled water pipeline; asphalt concrete overlay work; and $1 million electrical control system package. The installation of the new sewer pipeline allows wastewater to carry from the north shore of Agua Hedionda Lagoon to the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility on Avenida Encinas.

Inland Rail Trail, (2019 – Current)
The Inland Rail Trail is a proposed Class I bikeway that passes through Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos, Escondido, and a portion of the unincorporated County of San Diego. The Inland Rail Trail is an essential element of the San Diego Regional Bike Plan and is considered a priority project. Completion of the Inland Rail Trail and other similar Class I bikeways will help create an interconnected regional bike network. A Class I bikeway is a bike path that is physically separated from motor vehicle traffic.

The work consists of building four miles of 8- to 10-foot-wide paved paths parallel to the railroad tracks. This job includes retaining walls, RCC slope paving, electrical drainage systems, and a bike bridge. The challenge of this project was building all the large retaining walls and performing the RCC slope paving in such a small area, as the project was on a narrow path, mainly in the railroad right of way up against residential housing.

Monte Vista Avenue Grade Separation, (2017 – 2019)
This project consists of grade separation and associated roadway improvements to provide four lanes of traffic and a connector between Monte Vista Avenue and State Street. The grade separation will elevate Monte Vista Avenue over three UPRR tracks and State Street sets. The existing at-grade conflict between vehicular and rail traffic will be removed, reducing congestion, and improving safety.

Perris Dam Seismic Remediation, (2014 – 2018)
Pulice completed work to strengthen the dam’s foundation through the construction of a new compacted berm, an extension of the existing blanket drain, construction of a new drain line, a new toe drain, and relief well system, and deep cement soil mixing treatment of the alluvium beneath the footprint of the compacted berm. Pulice’s modifications included extending the existing drainage system comprised of 1.8 million CY of filter material, drain material, and compacted berm buttress.

Upon completion, the berm is now 4,100’ long x 180’ wide x 50’ tall. Perris Dam had its own onsite Rock Quarry where the team drilled, blasted, and processed all the necessary sand and rock products with an onsite crushing/processing plant for the filter system and drain blanket. All the clay products were also onsite, and they were mined and processed before placement.

Years of Experience: 36
Licenses/Registrations:

CA General Contractor A&B
Trainings/Education:
• OSHA 30 Hr
• CASQA Qualified SWPPP
Practitioner QSP
• Confined Space Certified
• Fall Protection Certified
• Aerial Lift Certified
• Excavation Safety Training
• AQMD C.V. Fugitive Dust
Control Class
• Hazmat/HAZWOPER
• Lockout/Tagout Certified
Packet Pg. 775
PROPOSALS for

CAROUSEL MALL DEMOLITION

Page 4 ends

Crafton Hills Reservoir, (2011 – 2014)
The purpose of this project was the construction of a new earthen embankment Dam. The scope of work included excavation of the dam foundation, excavating and installing a concrete cutoff wall, placing dam plastic core material, dam filter, and drain material, putting rock slope protection, grouting of the dam foundation, and constructing a seepage collection system along with all the drainage system. This project was in a deep canyon with minimal access and a restricted work area. Before clay placement, the dam foundation had to be blown clean and dental concrete installed to all small verticals and geological faults.

Taxiway B Barstow/Daggett Airport, (2010 – 2011)
This project at Daggett airport aimed to install a new Taxiway B that ran parallel to the runway. It included all-new lighting on the runway and taxiway, installing two cross taxiways connecting the taxiway to the runway, constructing a new electrical building with all new equipment, white paving around the fueling docks, and onsite crushing, placing base rock, and AC paving.

Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport Taxiway G, (2009)
This project consisted of building a new taxiway paralleling the runway, including soil-cement due to high groundwater and cross taxiways were connecting the taxiway to the runway, completing new lighting systems on the taxiway and runway, placing base rock, and AC paving.

Redlands Sports Park Project Ph. I, (2005 – 2006)
This project aimed to build a sports park on over 57 acres of land. It included mass grading work, complete underground infrastructure, storm drain system, water system, electrical lighting system, sewer system, new roads coming in and out of the facility, and parking lots.

Grand Crossing Area C, (2005)
In the City of Industry, CA, The Grand Crossing Area C project consisted of mass grading of over 150 acres of land, moving over 1,800,000 cubic yards of dirt, cleaning out the canyons, and then filling the canyons with material from lowering down the steep hills to create large pads for future warehouses. This job created several challenges in that once the final slope cuts were finished on the hillside, they would slide down to unexpected slip planes. This created multiple safety issues where the team was required to lay the hill back flatter than anticipated, then build keyways and buttresses to hold up the unstable hillside.

Target Distribution Center, (2004)
This project aimed to perform the mass grading and underground infrastructure on 240 acres of land for Target to build a

3.1 millionsquare- foot distribution warehouse. This project required extensive coordination between the subcontractors and owners, as work was being performed simultaneously by numerous trades.

East Dam Reservoir, 1997 – (2000)
East Dam is one of three dams constructed for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California’s Eastside Reservoir project. The reservoir doubles Southern California’s surface storage capacity and provides a six-month emergency water supply to nearly 16 million residents in an earthquake or drought. The project scope was to construct a new 2.1-mile-long dam, measuring 1,200 feet wide at the base and 40 feet wide at the top. The project included 18,000,000 CY of alluvial excavation to get to solid bedrock. Embankment included 43,000,000 CY of onsite crushed rock, cut-off wall, grout, onsite clay processing, and embankment. The project also had its onsite rock quarry, blasting for all rock products.

Packet Pg. 776
Work Plan
2 Packet Pg. 777
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: San Bernardino Building Structure Demo Plan City Of San Bernardino Carousel Mall    
 Packet Pg. 778
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: San Bernardino Structural Separation Demo Plan City Of San Bernardino Carousel Mall Critical Building Separation at Existingbuildings to remain
Critical BuildingSeparation at Existingbuildings to remain    
 Packet Pg. 779
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: San Bernardino Building Separation Demo Plan City Of San Bernardino Carousel MallCritical Building Separation at Existingbuildings to remain
Critical BuildingSeparation at Existingbuildings to remain    
 Packet Pg. 780
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: Carousel Mall San Bernardino West Bridge Demo Plan San Bernardino Structural Barricade
   
 Packet Pg. 781
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: Carousel Mall San Bernardino East Bridge Demo Plan San Bernardino Stair access to remain
Stair / ramp accessto remain
   
 Packet Pg. 782
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: San Bernardino Building Demo Progress City Of San Bernardino Carousel Mall Site Fencing
   
 Packet Pg. 783
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: Carousel Mall San Bernardino Building Demo Progress San Bernardino Site Fencing
   
 Packet Pg. 784
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: Carousel Mall San Bernardino Building Demo Progress San Bernardino    
 Packet Pg. 785
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: Carousel Mall San Bernardino Building Demo Progress San Bernardino    
 Packet Pg. 786
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: Carousel Mall San Bernardino Building Demo Progress San Bernardino    
 Packet Pg. 787
Project: Location: Date: Job # Scale: 1" = 20' Project Team Sheet Title: General Contractor: San Bernardino Site Paving removal City of San Bernardino Carousel Mall Required Perimeter Site pavement removal for Foundations and balanceof grade.
   
 Packet Pg. 788
Hazardous Assessment
3 Packet Pg. 789
750 S. Lincoln Avenue, #104, Corona, CA 92882
O: 951.545.2495 * F: 951.346.3093
Limited Asbestos Survey Inspection Report
Project Site:

Carousel Mall
295 Carousel Mall
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Prepared for:

Force Demolition
1675 Commerce Street
Corona, CA 92878
Packet Pg. 790
Limited Asbestos Survey Inspection Report for
Carousel Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Prepared for Force Demolition, Inc.

By Focus Environmental Consulting, Project No.2870AS Page 1 Record of Certification:

This is to certify that this report was prepared by Focus Environmental Consulting (Focus) for our design build team for bidding purposes only. This is not a comprehensive survey and cannot be used for notification or abatement activities.

Packet Pg. 791
Limited Asbestos Survey Inspection Report for
Carousel Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Prepared for Force Demolition, Inc.

By Focus Environmental Consulting, Project No.2870AS Page 2 Introduction:

Report Date: September 13, 2022
Client: Force Demolition, Inc.
1675 Commerce Street
Corona, CA 92878
Project Site: Carousel Mall
295 Carousel Mall
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Scope of Work: Limited Asbestos Survey Inspection
Project Date(s): September 8, 2022
Summary:

The following is a report for the limited asbestos-containing material (ACM) survey inspection conducted by Mr. David Camarillo (CSST #98-2424) of Focus Environmental Consulting (Focus). The survey was performed on September 8, 2022, at the above referenced project site.

The asbestos survey inspection was limited to larger quantity materials only, for the purpose of creating a bidding proposal for abatement and demolition.

Site Description:

The retail building is a two-story, CMU and concrete structure on a concrete foundation with a flat roof.

The interior consisted of drywall, plaster, acoustic, fireproofing, drop-in ceiling tiles, VCT and ceramic flooring.

The interior space has sustained major damaged due to transient activities and fire damage.

No other areas, materials or structures were included in this survey. This report is limited to only those areas and materials called out in this report. Hazards may still exist within areas of the structures that were not part of our scope of work. This report excludes all oils, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB), water, soil, and subgrade materials. If exposed, these hazards may require further sampling and proper removal and disposal by a certified contractor.

Scope of Work:

The survey was conducted to identify ACMs prior to bidding for demolition. Sampling was limited to accessible materials reasonably assumed would be impacted by potential demolition activities.

Methods and Sampling Strategy:

Asbestos Bulk Sample Analysis and Results:

Bulk samples of homogeneous materials from identified areas containing suspect ACM were collected.

A homogeneous material is defined as a surfacing material, thermal system insulation (TSI) or miscellaneous material that is uniform in use, color, texture and age of construction. Presumed ACM was also physically assessed for friability, condition and disturbance factors. Inaccessible suspect materials may be located between walls, in voids, or in other inaccessible areas.

Packet Pg. 792
Limited Asbestos Survey Inspection Report for
Carousel Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Prepared for Force Demolition, Inc.

By Focus Environmental Consulting, Project No.2870AS Page 3 Under EPA assessment criteria, if a single sample from a homogeneous material test positive for asbestos, then the entire homogeneous material located in the same functional space must be considered as being asbestos containing.

Using a random sampling scheme, samples were collected from building materials of the structure. As materials were identified, a random bulk sampling protocol was used to collect bulk samples. Each bulk sample collected was placed into an individual sampling bag and given a discreet identification number, then recorded on chain-of-custody forms. The location of each sample was then marked on a site drawing.

All bulk samples collected were submitted to and analyzed by AIH Laboratory (AIH) located at 2556 W.

Woodland Drive in Anaheim, CA 92801 and can be contacted at (562) 860-2201. AIH is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP #500079-0). The laboratory report #2214366 is attached.

Samples were analyzed using the Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) techniques in accordance with the methodology approved by the EPA, Method 600/R-93-116, using PLM with dispersion staining and using visual area estimation to determine percent asbestos content, as set forth in 40 CFR Part 763, Appendix A to Subpart F, Section 1.2 and 1.7.2.4. California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) defines asbestos containing construction materials (ACCM) as any manufactured construction material with a content greater than 1/10th of 1% asbestos by weight (>0.1%).

The lower limit of reliable detection for asbestos using the PLM analytical method is one percent (1.0%) by volume. Any sample indicating a concentration of less than one percent (<1.0% or “trace”) asbestos can be further analyzed using the more accurate Point Count Method of analysis to precisely determine the asbestos content below the limit of detection (LOD) of 1% as outlined in EPA600/R-93-116.

Cal/OSHA requires that employers engaged in construction activities involving ACCM with a content greater than one tenth of one percent (>0.1%) asbestos must comply with all applicable provisions of Title 8 Section 1529 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR). Therefore, in California, ACCM materials, in addition to those that meet the NESHAP definition of ACM, are regulated by Cal/OSHA, and should be handled by a licensed Cal/OSHA-certified asbestos abatement contractor.

When None Detected (ND) appears in this report, it should be interpreted as meaning no asbestos was observed in the sample’s material above the reliable limit of detection for the PLM method.

A total of twenty-five (25) suspect asbestos-containing material bulk samples were identified and collected for analysis during the survey. Some samples collected may have multiple layers of material in which case the laboratory is required to separate and analyze. A total of thirty-six (36) sample layers were analyzed by the laboratory.

The analytical findings are listed below:

Asbestos-Containing Material(s)
Sample
No.

Material Color &
Description
Sample Location Asbestos
Result
Friable/NonFriableCondition
05 Beige Exterior Stucco West End of Roof 1% Chrysotile NF Good 06 07, 08,
09, 10, 11
Off-White Fireproofing 2nd Floor @ Corridor, West
End, JC Penny, Center
10%
Chrysotile
F Significantly
Damaged
Packet Pg. 793
Limited Asbestos Survey Inspection Report for
Carousel Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Prepared for Force Demolition, Inc.

By Focus Environmental Consulting, Project No.2870AS Page 4 and East End 1st Floor @
East End
12 Off White Acoustic
Ceiling
2nd Floor @ North Center 4% Chrysotile F Damaged
16, 17, 18 Drywall w/Joint
Compound
2nd Floor @ West End, JC
Penny, North Center
<1%
Chrysotile
F Significantly
Damaged
22 Black Mirror Mastic 1st Floor @ Elevator 3% Chrysotile NF Significantly Damaged
24 Grey w/Red 12”x12”
Floor Tile and Mastic
2nd Floor @ JC Penny 2% Chrysotile
(Mastic)
NF Good
25 Beige 12”x12” Floor
Tile and Mastic
2nd Floor @ North Center 2% Chrysotile
(Mastic)
NF Good
Non-Asbestos-Containing Material(s)
Sample
No.

Material Color &
Description
Sample Location Asbestos
Result
Friable/NonFriableCondition
01, 02 Rock Over Tar Roof
Core
Roof @ Center Next to
Stairs, Center
ND NF Good
03 White Rolled Roofing
Core
Roof @ South End ND NF Good
04 Silver TPO Roofing
Core
Roof @ Center ND NF Good
13, 14 Lt. Blue 1’x1’ Pinhole
Ceiling Tiles
2nd Floor @ East and West
Ends
ND F Significantly
Damaged
15 White 2’x4’ 2nd Floor @ North Center ND F Significantly Damaged
19, 20, 21 Interior Plaster 1st Floor @ East End, 2nd
Floor @ West End and
Center
ND NF Significantly
Damaged
23 *Brown Cove Base
Mastic
2nd Floor @ North Center ND NF Good
*Cove Base Mastic sample collected was found to be negative for asbestos. However, the sample had drywall material attached (2nd Layer) which was found to have positive asbestos. This material is non-friable.

ND – None Detected SF – Square Feet NF – Non-Friable
LF – Linear Feet F – Friable
Limitations:

Based on the analytical results, the ACM being damaged, a Procedure 5 will need to be written and approved by SCAQMD before any removal, cleanup or demolition is commenced.

The interpretation of the preliminary findings identified in the submitted report is based upon the analytical findings, our professional experience and qualifications. The field investigation and laboratory results are limited to only those areas, which were exposed and/or physically accessible to the inspector as outlined by the scope of work. It is possible that asbestos exists in areas that were not identified, were inaccessible, unsafe or were not called out in this report. Focus does not guarantee or warrant that all asbestos-containing materials were discovered and/or sampled in the structure.

Packet Pg. 794
Limited Asbestos Survey Inspection Report for
Carousel Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Prepared for Force Demolition, Inc.

By Focus Environmental Consulting, Project No.2870AS Page 5 Sincerely,
Focus Environmental Consulting

__________________________________
Attachments:

Project Photographs
Laboratory Analytical Results/Sample Chains of Custody
Sample Location Sketches
Inspectors’ Asbestos Certifications
Packet Pg. 795
Limited Asbestos Survey Inspection Report for
Carousel Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Prepared for Force Demolition, Inc.

By Focus Environmental Consulting, Project No.2870AS Page 6 Project Photographs
Packet Pg. 796
Limited Asbestos Survey Inspection Report for
Carousel Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Prepared for Force Demolition, Inc.

By Focus Environmental Consulting, Project No.2870AS Page 7 Laboratory Analytical Results/Sample Chains of Custody
Packet Pg. 797
2556 W Woodland Dr Anaheim, CA 92801

BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS

BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Phone:(562) 860-2201
www.aihlab.com
Client Name: Focus Environmental Consulting
Project Manager: N/A
Client Address: 750 S. Lincoln Ave., 104-166
Corona, CA 92882
Project Number: Carousel Mall
Project Location: Carousel Mall, San Bernardino
Lab Batch Number: 2215735
Samples Submitted: 25
Samples Analyzed: 25
Analysis Method: EPA 600/R-93-116 &
EPA 600/M4-82-020
Lab Notes at Page 6 V14-1A Page 1 of 6
Lab ID: 221573501 Client ID: 01
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Black fibrous asphaltic material with granules None Detected Glass Fibers 10% Asphalt/Binder, Mineral Grains

2. Multi-layered black fibrous asphaltic material None Detected Glass Fibers 10% Asphalt/Binder

3. Black fibrous asphaltic material None Detected Cellulose 40% Asphalt/Binder

4. Brown compressed fibrous material None Detected Cellulose 85% Binder/Filler, Perlite

5. Black asphaltic mastic None Detected Glass Fibers 3% Asphalt/Binder

6. Off white chalky material None Detected None Detected Binder/Filler, Vermiculite
Lab ID: 221573502 Client ID: 02
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Black fibrous asphaltic material None Detected Cellulose 25% Asphalt/Binder Lab ID: 221573503 Client ID: 03
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Black fibrous asphaltic material with granules None Detected Glass Fibers 10% Asphalt/Binder, Mineral Grains

2. Multi-layered black fibrous asphaltic material None Detected Glass Fibers 10% Asphalt/Binder

3. Off white chalky material None Detected None Detected Binder/Filler, Vermiculite
Packet Pg. 798
2556 W Woodland Dr Anaheim, CA 92801

BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS

BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Phone:(562) 860-2201
www.aihlab.com
Client Name: Focus Environmental Consulting
Project Manager: N/A
Client Address: 750 S. Lincoln Ave., 104-166
Corona, CA 92882
Project Number: Carousel Mall
Project Location: Carousel Mall, San Bernardino
Lab Batch Number: 2215735
Samples Submitted: 25
Samples Analyzed: 25
Analysis Method: EPA 600/R-93-116 &
EPA 600/M4-82-020
Lab Notes at Page 6 V14-1A Page 2 of 6
Lab ID: 221573504 Client ID: 04
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Silver coating None Detected None Detected Binder/Filler

2. Grey fibrous material None Detected Glass Fibers 5%, Synthetic Fibers 80% Binder/Filler

3. Black fibrous asphaltic felt None Detected Cellulose 60% Asphalt/Binder

4. Black asphaltic mastic None Detected None Detected Asphalt/Binder Lab ID: 221573505 Client ID: 05
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Beige sandy material Chrysotile 1% Cellulose <1% Binder/Filler, Mineral Grains

2. Grey sandy material None Detected Cellulose <1% Binder/Filler, Mineral Grains
Lab ID: 221573506 Client ID: 06
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Off white fibrous chalky material Chrysotile 10% Glass Fibers 5% Binder/Filler Lab ID: 221573507 Client ID: 07
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. White fibrous chalky material Chrysotile 10% None Detected Binder/Filler, Vermiculite
Lab ID: 221573508 Client ID: 08
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Off white fibrous chalky material Chrysotile 10% Glass Fibers 5% Binder/Filler Packet Pg. 799
2556 W Woodland Dr Anaheim, CA 92801

BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS

BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Phone:(562) 860-2201
www.aihlab.com
Client Name: Focus Environmental Consulting
Project Manager: N/A
Client Address: 750 S. Lincoln Ave., 104-166
Corona, CA 92882
Project Number: Carousel Mall
Project Location: Carousel Mall, San Bernardino
Lab Batch Number: 2215735
Samples Submitted: 25
Samples Analyzed: 25
Analysis Method: EPA 600/R-93-116 &
EPA 600/M4-82-020
Lab Notes at Page 6 V14-1A Page 3 of 6
Lab ID: 221573509 Client ID: 09
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Off white fibrous chalky material Chrysotile 10% Glass Fibers 5% Binder/Filler Lab ID: 221573510 Client ID: 10
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. White fibrous chalky material Chrysotile 10% None Detected Binder/Filler, Vermiculite
Lab ID: 221573511 Client ID: 11
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. White fibrous chalky material Chrysotile 10% None Detected Binder/Filler, Vermiculite
Lab ID: 221573512 Client ID: 12
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Off white lumpy foamy material Chrysotile 4% None Detected Binder/Filler, Synthetic Foam
Lab ID: 221573513 Client ID: 13
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Grey compressed fibrous material with paint None Detected Cellulose 10%,
Glass Fibers 10%,
Mineral Wool 65%
Binder/Filler, Paint
Lab ID: 221573514 Client ID: 14
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Grey compressed fibrous material with paint None Detected Cellulose 10%,
Glass Fibers 10%,
Mineral Wool 65%
Binder/Filler, Paint
Packet Pg. 800
2556 W Woodland Dr Anaheim, CA 92801

BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS

BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Phone:(562) 860-2201
www.aihlab.com
Client Name: Focus Environmental Consulting
Project Manager: N/A
Client Address: 750 S. Lincoln Ave., 104-166
Corona, CA 92882
Project Number: Carousel Mall
Project Location: Carousel Mall, San Bernardino
Lab Batch Number: 2215735
Samples Submitted: 25
Samples Analyzed: 25
Analysis Method: EPA 600/R-93-116 &
EPA 600/M4-82-020
Lab Notes at Page 6 V14-1A Page 4 of 6
Lab ID: 221573515 Client ID: 15
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Brown compressed fibrous material with paint None Detected Cellulose 65%, Mineral Wool 20%
Binder/Filler, Perlite,
Paint
Lab ID: 221573516 Client ID: 16
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Cream compacted powdery material with paint None Detected None Detected JC/Binder, Paint

2. White chalky material with paper None Detected Cellulose 6%, Glass Fibers 2% Gypsum/Binder
Lab ID: 221573517 Client ID: 17
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. White compacted powdery material Chrysotile <1% None Detected Binder/Filler

2. White compacted powdery material with paper Chrysotile <1% Cellulose 2% JC/Binder

3. White chalky material with paper None Detected Cellulose 6%, Glass Fibers 2% Gypsum/Binder
Lab ID: 221573518 Client ID: 18
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. White compacted powdery material Chrysotile <1% None Detected JC/Binder

2. White chalky material with paper None Detected Cellulose 6%, Glass Fibers 2% Gypsum/Binder
Lab ID: 221573519 Client ID: 19
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. White sandy material with paint None Detected Cellulose <1% Binder/Filler, Paint

2. Grey sandy material None Detected Cellulose <1% Binder/Filler, Mineral Grains
Packet Pg. 801
2556 W Woodland Dr Anaheim, CA 92801

BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS

BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Phone:(562) 860-2201
www.aihlab.com
Client Name: Focus Environmental Consulting
Project Manager: N/A
Client Address: 750 S. Lincoln Ave., 104-166
Corona, CA 92882
Project Number: Carousel Mall
Project Location: Carousel Mall, San Bernardino
Lab Batch Number: 2215735
Samples Submitted: 25
Samples Analyzed: 25
Analysis Method: EPA 600/R-93-116 &
EPA 600/M4-82-020
Lab Notes at Page 6 V14-1A Page 5 of 6
Lab ID: 221573520 Client ID: 20
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. White sandy material with paint None Detected Cellulose <1% Binder/Filler, Paint

2. Grey sandy material None Detected Cellulose <1% Binder/Filler, Mineral Grains
Lab ID: 221573521 Client ID: 21
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Black asphaltic mastic Chrysotile 3% None Detected Asphalt/Binder Lab ID: 221573522 Client ID: 22
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Black asphaltic mastic Chrysotile 3% None Detected Asphalt/Binder Lab ID: 221573523 Client ID: 23
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Dark brown brittle mastic None Detected None Detected Mastic/Binder

2. White compacted powdery material Chrysotile <1% None Detected Binder/Filler Lab ID: 221573524 Client ID: 24
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Grey floor tile None Detected None Detected Binder/Filler

2. Black/tan asphaltic mastic Chrysotile 2% None Detected Asphalt/Binder, Mastic/Binder
Packet Pg. 802
2556 W Woodland Dr Anaheim, CA 92801

BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS

BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Phone:(562) 860-2201
www.aihlab.com
Client Name: Focus Environmental Consulting
Project Manager: N/A
Client Address: 750 S. Lincoln Ave., 104-166
Corona, CA 92882
Project Number: Carousel Mall
Project Location: Carousel Mall, San Bernardino
Lab Batch Number: 2215735
Samples Submitted: 25
Samples Analyzed: 25
Analysis Method: EPA 600/R-93-116 &
EPA 600/M4-82-020
Lab Notes at Page 6 V14-1A Page 6 of 6
Lab ID: 221573525 Client ID: 25
Layer Layer Description Asbestos Type % Other Fibrous Material % Other Non Fibrous Material

1. Beige floor tile None Detected None Detected Binder/Filler

2. Black asphaltic mastic Chrysotile 2% None Detected Asphalt/Binder Analyzed by: Don Nguyen Signature: Date: 09-12-2022
Reviewed by: Zubair Ahmed Signature: Date: 09-12-2022
Reporting limit is 1%. If the sample was not collected by AIH Laboratory then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and experience of the sample collector. Clients can verify specific reporting limit requirement from local regulatory agencies. Liability limited to cost of samples analysis. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of AIH Laboratory. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the government. Reported results relate only to the samples tested and may not be the representative of the sample area. AIH Laboratory shall dispose of the Customer's samples 14 days after receiving the samples unless instructed to store them for an alternate period of time in writing.

Packet Pg. 803
Packet Pg. 804
Packet Pg. 805
Limited Asbestos Survey Inspection Report for
Carousel Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Prepared for Force Demolition, Inc.

By Focus Environmental Consulting, Project No.2870AS Page 1 Inspectors’ Asbestos Certifications
Packet Pg. 806
18,150 SF
44,050 SF 17,250 SF
18,285 SF
76,200 SF
Copy of 14.pdf (32% of Scale); Takeoff in Active Area: All Areas; Carousel Mall; Nick's Database; 9/27/2022 10:11 AM Outer Area's Roof Deck
Fireproofing Locations Packet Pg. 807
Fireproofing - Q1 64,294 SF

3.pdf (30% of Scale); Takeoff in Active Area: All Areas; Carousel Mall; Nick's Database; 9/19/2022 02:29 PM Corridor Roof Deck
Fireproofing Locations Packet Pg. 808
Department Store's Roof
Deck Fireproofing Locations
72,000 SF 76,350 SF
   
 Packet Pg. 809
Fireproofing - Q1 47,970 SF

2.pdf (33% of Scale); Takeoff in Active Area: All Areas; Carousel Mall; Nick's Database; 9/19/2022 02:29 PM Corridor 2nd Floor Deck
Fireproofing Locations Packet Pg. 810
Department Store's 2nd Floor
Deck Fireproofing Locations
56,000 SF
   
 Packet Pg. 811
Department Store's 2nd Floor
Tile Mastic Locations
52,000 SF 57,250 SF
   
 Packet Pg. 812
Department Store's 1st Floor
Tile Mastic Locations
68,000 SF 57,250 SF
   
 Packet Pg. 813
Firestone Tire Center Roof Deck
Fireproofing Locations
16,200 SF
   
 Packet Pg. 814
Montgomery Ward Roof Deck
Fireproofing Locations
7,200 SF
   
 Packet Pg. 815
3050 E. Birch Street
Brea, CA 92821
Phone: (714) 984-5500
griffithcompany.net
Packet Pg. 816
Packet Pg. 817
Packet Pg. 818
Packet Pg. 819
Packet Pg. 820
Packet Pg. 821
Packet Pg. 822
Packet Pg. 823
Packet Pg. 824
Packet Pg. 825
Packet Pg. 826
Packet Pg. 827
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Carousel Mall
San Bernardino, California 92401
City of San Bernardino
201 North E Street, Suite 200 | San Bernardino, California 92401 May 25, 2022 | Project No. 211871001
Geotechnical | Environmental | Construction Inspection & Testing | Forensic Engineering & Expert Witness Geophysics | Engineering Geology | Laboratory Testing | Industrial Hygiene | Occupational Safety | Air Quality | GIS Packet Pg. 828
475 Goddard, Ste. 200 | Irvine, California 92618 | p. 949.753.7070 | www.ninyoandmoore.com Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Carousel Mall
San Bernardino, California 92401
Mr. Alex Qishta
City of San Bernardino
201 North E Street, Suite 200 | San Bernardino, California 92401 May 25, 2022 | Project No. 211871001
Sonia Cisneros Ortiz
Project Environmental Scientist
Patrick Cullip, EIT, ENV SP
Senior Project Engineer
John Jay Roberts, PG, CEG
Principal Geologist
SCO/ PJC/JJR/sc
Packet Pg. 829
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 i

CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Purpose 1

1.2 Scope of Services 2

1.3 Significant Assumptions 2

1.4 Limitations and Exceptions 2

1.5 Special Terms and Conditions 3

1.6 User Reliance 3

1.7 Involved Parties 3
2 SITE DESCRIPTION 3
3 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION 4
4 RECORDS REVIEW 4

4.1 Standard Environmental Record Source - Environmental Database Search 4

4.1.1 Geocoded (Mapped) Listings 5

4.1.2 Non-Geocoded (Unmapped) Listings 16

4.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources 17

4.2.1 California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) 17

4.2.2 Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region 18

4.2.3 San Bernardino County Fire Protection District (SBCFPD) 20

4.2.4 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 23

4.2.5 California, Department of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) 23

4.2.6 Online Regulatory Databases 23

4.3 Physical Setting 27

4.4 Site Historical Use Information 28

4.4.1 City Directories 28

4.4.2 Sanborn® Fire Insurance Maps 31

4.4.3 Historical Aerial Photographs 33

4.4.4 Historical Topographic Maps 34

4.4.5 Building Department Records 34

4.5 Previous Reports 37
Packet Pg. 830
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 ii

4.6 Adjoining Property History 39
5 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 40

5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions 40

5.2 General Site Setting 40

5.3 Adjoining Property Observations 42

5.4 Site Observations 42
6 INTERVIEWS 43
7 FINDINGS 44
8 OPINIONS 46

8.1 RECs 46

8.2 CRECs 48

8.3 HRECs 48

8.4 De Minimis Conditions 48

8.5 Data Gaps 48
9 CONCLUSIONS 48
10 REFERENCES 50
11 PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT 52
12 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL 52
TABLES
1 – General Site Setting 4
2 – Summary of Database-Provided Information 5
3 – Summary of On-Site Listings 6
4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern 7 5 – Online Regulatory Databases 24
6 – Physical Setting 28
7 – Sanborn® Fire Insurance Maps Summary 31
8 – Aerial Photographs Summary 33
9 – Historical Topographic Maps Summary 34
10 – On-Site Observations 42
11 – Interviews 43
Packet Pg. 831
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 iii

FIGURES
1 – Site Location
2 – Site Plan
3 – Site Plan, Former Montgomery Ward and Firestone/JC Penney Service Centers

APPENDICES
A – Photographs
B – User and Property Owner Provided Information
C – Environmental Database Report
D – Regulatory Documentation
E – Historical Research Documentation
F – Qualification of the Environmental Professionals
Packet Pg. 832
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 1 1 INTRODUCTION
Ninyo & Moore was retained by the City of San Bernardino (herein referred to as the client) to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property located at the Carousel Mall, consisting of 13 San Bernardino County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs, 013-418-128, 013-420-125, 013-421-134, -136, and -138, 013-422-145, 013-423-127 to -129, and -131, 013- 429-111, 013-430-120 and -122). The site is bound to the north and northwest by West 4th Street, to the east by North E Street, to the south by West 2nd Street, and to the southwest by North G Street, in San Bernardino, California (hereinafter referred to as the site; Figure 1). The following sections discuss the purpose, the involved parties, the scope of services, and the limitations and exceptions associated with the Phase I ESA.

1.1 Purpose
In accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM) Standard Practice for ESAs on Commercial Real Estate E1527-13 and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries, the objective of the Phase I ESA is to evaluate for recognized environmental conditions (RECs). The term recognized environmental conditions means “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions.” Identification of RECs fall into the following three categories: existing RECs (as defined above); Historical RECs (HRECs); or Controlled RECs (CRECs). HRECs and CRECs are defined as follows:
• HREC – An HREC is defined as “a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations [AULs], institutional controls, or engineering controls).” An HREC is an environmental condition, which in the past, would have been considered a REC, but currently may or may not be considered a REC. An example of an HREC may be a former gas station where a release of gasoline had occurred, but the site was cleaned up to an unrestricted land use standard. • CREC – A CREC is defined as a “recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by a regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, AULs, institutional controls, or engineering controls).” An example of a CREC Packet Pg. 833
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 2 could be a former gas station where a release of gasoline has been cleaned up to a commercial use standard, but does not meet unrestricted residential cleanup criteria.

1.2 Scope of Services
Ninyo & Moore’s scope of services for this Phase I ESA consisted of the activities listed below. • Reviewed physical setting and background information. • Performed a site reconnaissance.
• Reviewed federal, state, tribal, and local regulatory agency databases for the site and for properties located within a specified radius of the site. • Reviewed reasonably ascertainable local regulatory agency files for the site, as applicable. • Reviewed historical information for the site, such as historical aerial photographs, historical topographic maps, reverse street directories, Sanborn® Fire Insurance maps, and building department records.
• Reviewed user-provided information, as available.
• Reviewed other documents provided from third party sources, as available. • Interviewed the property owner representative (if available) regarding the environmental status of the site.
• Prepared this Phase I ESA report, summarizing findings and providing opinions and conclusions regarding RECs at the site.

1.3 Significant Assumptions
Ninyo & Moore assumes the information sources from the third-party environmental database vendor, regulatory agencies, and interviewees utilized for this report provided adequate and accurate information. Other significant assumptions were not made during the preparation of this report.

1.4 Limitations and Exceptions
The environmental services described in this report have been conducted in general accordance with current regulatory guidelines and the standard of care exercised by environmental consultants performing similar work in the project area. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the professional opinions presented in this report.

This document is intended to be used only in its entirety. No portion of the document, by itself, is designed to completely represent any aspect of the project described herein. Ninyo & Moore Packet Pg. 834
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 3 should be contacted if the reader requires any additional information or has questions regarding the content, interpretations presented, or completeness of this document.

The findings, opinions, and conclusions are based on an analysis of the observed site conditions and the referenced literature. It should be understood that the conditions of a site could change with time as a result of natural processes or the activities of man at the subject site or nearby sites. In addition, changes to the applicable laws, regulations, codes, and standards of practice may occur due to government action or the broadening of knowledge. The findings of this report may, therefore, be invalidated over time, in part or in whole, by changes over which Ninyo & Moore has no control. Ninyo & Moore cannot warrant or guarantee that not finding indicators of any particular hazardous material means that this particular hazardous material or any other hazardous materials do not exist on the site. Additional research, including invasive testing, can reduce the uncertainty, but no techniques now commonly employed can eliminate the uncertainty altogether.

1.5 Special Terms and Conditions
This study did not include an evaluation of geotechnical conditions or potential geologic hazards.

In addition, unless otherwise indicated in this report, this Phase I ESA does not include analysis of the following, which is not intended to be all-inclusive: asbestos-containing materials, methane gas, lead-containing surfaces, underground pipelines, wetlands, regulatory compliance, cultural and historic resources, industrial hygiene, health and safety, ecological resources, endangered species, or high voltage power lines.

1.6 User Reliance
This report may be relied upon by, and is intended exclusively for, the client and its assigns. Any use or reuse of the findings, opinions, and/or conclusions of this report by parties other than these is undertaken at said parties’ sole risk.

1.7 Involved Parties
Ms. Sonia Cisneros Ortiz, Project Environmental Scientist, performed historical research, document review, and the site reconnaissance on April 26, 2022. Mr. Patrick Cullip, Senior Project Engineer, and Mr. John Jay Roberts, Principal Geologist, performed quality review. 2 SITE DESCRIPTION
The following table provides a general description of the subject site. Photographs taken during the site reconnaissance are provided in Appendix A.

Packet Pg. 835
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 4 Table 1 – General Site Setting
General Site Setting Description
Location
The site consists of 13 San Bernardino County APNs. The site is bound to the north and northwest by West 4th Street, to the east by North E Street, to the south by West 2nd Street, and to the southwest by North G Street, in San Bernardino, California (Figure 1).

Addresses associated with the site include: 605 and 677 West 4th Street, 144 Central City Mall, and 144, 160, and 295 Carousel Mall. Historical addresses include 398 F Street, 340 G Street, and 698 and 729 3rd Street.

Assessor Parcel No. 013-418-128, 013-420-125, 013-421-134, -136, and -138, 013-422-145, 013-423-127 to - 129, and -131, 013-429-111, 013-430-120 and -122 (County of San Bernardino) Property Owner City of San Bernardino
Size (approximate) 43.35 acres (approximate)
Site Use / Occupants At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was developed with the Carousel Mall, which was vacant/closed.

Structures
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was occupied by a closed shopping mall (Carousel Mall) which was located primarily on the central portion of the site. The central portion of the site was developed with a two-story building (former Montgomery Ward department store at 295 Carousel Mall) located on the west-central portion of the site, a two-story building (former JCPenney department store at 160 Carousel Mall) located on the north-central portion of the site, and a two-story internal mall with numerous tenant spaces located on the first and second floors of the shopping mall. A single-story building (former Montgomery Ward service center) was observed on the northwestern portion of the site. The former Montgomery Ward service center had a basement that underlain the southwestern portion of the building. A single-story building (former JC Penney/Firestone service center) was located east of the former Montgomery Ward service center. The northeastern portion of the site was developed with a concrete three-level parking structure.

Roads
The site is bound to the north and northwest by West 4th Street, to the east by North E Street, to the south by West 2nd Street, and to the southwest by North G Street. The site was developed with asphalt-paved roads and parking lots located on the north, south, and west sides of the site. The site was developed with seven driveway entrances that enter the site.

Heating and Cooling
Systems
Roof-mounted heating and air conditioning units were observed on the site buildings at the time of the site reconnaissance.

Electricity Provider Southern California Edison
Sewer Disposal Provider City of San Bernardino Water Department Potable Water Provider City of San Bernardino Water Department Natural Gas The Southern California Gas Company
Site Vicinity Description The site vicinity consists of residential and commercial developments to the north, and commercial properties to the west, east, and south.
3 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION
Ninyo & Moore provided a user questionnaire to be filled out by the City of San Bernardino.

However, to date, a completed user questionnaire has not been filled out and returned to Ninyo & Moore. This is considered a data gap. If information from the completed user questionnaire alters the findings and conclusions of this report, an addendum will be prepared. 4 RECORDS REVIEW
The following sections summarize records reviewed for the site.

4.1 Standard Environmental Record Source - Environmental Database Search
A computerized, environmental information database search was performed by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) on April 18, 2022. The search included federal, state, tribal, and local Packet Pg. 836
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 5 databases. A summary of the environmental databases searched, their corresponding search radii, and number of noted properties of potential environmental concern, is presented in the EDR report (Appendix C). The review was conducted to evaluate whether the site or properties within the site vicinity have been documented as having experienced significant unauthorized releases of hazardous substances or other events with potentially adverse environmental effects.

4.1.1 Geocoded (Mapped) Listings
Properties within up to one-mile radius of the site were listed on various regulatory agency databases. The following table lists databases that were searched and the number of listings (excluding non-geocoded [unmapped] properties).

Table 2 – Summary of Database-Provided Information
Database Name Search Radius
(mile)
Number of
Listings
Federal Databases
NPL (National Priority List) 1 1
Proposed NPL 1 0
NPL LIENS (Federal Superfund Liens) 1 0
Delisted NPL 1 0
FEDERAL FACILITY (Federal Facility Site Information listing) 0.5 0 SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System; formerly Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System) 0.5 3 SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) 0.5 1 CORRACTS (facilities subject to Corrective action under RCRA) 1 0 RCRA-TSDF (hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities) 0.5 0 RCRA-LQG (large quantity generator) 0.25 3
RCRA-SQG (small quantity generator) 0.25 7
RCRA-VSQG (very small quantity generator) 0.25 0
US ENGINEERING CONTROL (EC) 0.5 0
US INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL (IC) 0.5 0
ERNS (Emergency Notification System) TP 0
State/Tribal Databases
Brownfields 0.5 0
RESPONSE (State Response Sites, State- and Tribal-equivalent NPL) 1 0 ENVIROSTOR (The DTSC’s Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program; CERCLISequivalent) 1 17 SWF/LF (Solid Waste Information System) 0.5 0
LUST (GeoTracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report) 0.5 51 SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigation and Cleanup database by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board) 0.5 2
UST (registered underground storage tanks [USTs]) 0.25 12 AST (registered aboveground storage tanks [ASTs]) 0.25 2 FEMA UST (Underground Storage Tank Listing) 0.25 0
VCP (Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties) 0.5 0
Additional Environmental Databases
US Brownfields (Local) 0.5 1
CA Hist Cal-Sites 1 0
CERS Haz Waste 0.25 17
SWEEPS UST (Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System UST Listing) 0.25 17 CA FID UST (California Facility Inventory Database UST Listing) 0.25 14 Hist UST (Historical UST Listing) 0.25 29
CERS Tanks 0.25 7
Packet Pg. 837
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 6 Table 2 – Summary of Database-Provided Information
Database Name Search Radius
(mile)
Number of
Listings
RCRA NonGen/ NLR 0.25 32
FUDS (Formerly Used Defensive Sites) 1 1
Cortese (“Cortese” Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List) 0.5 29 Hist Cortese (Hazardous Waste and Substance Site List) 0.5 16 EDR MGP (EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants) 1 2
EDR Hist Cleaner (EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners) 0.125 14 EDR Hist Auto (EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations) 0.125 35 Notes:

DTSC – Department of Toxic Substances Control
TP – Target Property
LUST – Leaking Underground Storage Tank
RCRA – Resource, Conservation, and Recovery Act
The site addresses of 144 Central City Mall and 677 West 4th Street were listed in the searched databases as Auto Express 2200/San Bernardino/Montgomery Ward and Firestone Store (BFS#180513), respectively. Other site addresses were not listed on the searched environmental databases. The following table is a summary of information listed for the site:

Table 3 – Summary of On-Site Listings
Business Name Databases Summary
Auto Express 2200
/ San Bernardino /
Montgomery Ward
144 Central City
Mall

RCRA-SQG
FINDS
ECHO
LUST

HIST UST

CORTESE
CERS
HWTS

SWEEPS UST

CA FID UST
EMI
This listing was reported as a small quantity generator of hazardous waste in 2001. Violations were not recorded against this listing. According to the State Water Resource Control Board’s (SWRCB’s) GeoTracker database, the site was listed as an open Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) case (T10000001491) as of December 12, 2018. According to the GeoTracker database, this site listing operated as an automotive service center in the northwestern portion of the site from 1972 until the mid-1980s. Results of the Phase I ESA that was conducted by Brown and Caldwell (B&C, 2007a, Section 4.5), reported this site listing as a primary area of concern since it included three 10,000-gallon former underground storage tanks (USTs) used for gasoline and other total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) products (removed in the mid-to-late 1980s), one 550-gallon former UST used for waste oil (removed in the mid-to-late 1980s), the former dispenser island and associated product piping from the former USTs (piping may still be present at the site), one clarifier located on the west side of the facility (still present at the site), hydraulic lifts used for vehicle maintenance and repair (still present at the site), and hazardous material storage. During subsurface investigations performed by B&C in October and November 2007, petroleum hydrocarbons in soil, soil vapor, and groundwater were detected. The investigations included 13 soil vapor probes, 28 soil borings, and two groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 and MW-2). In 2007, depth to groundwater at this listing was measured at 104 feet below ground surface (bgs).

TPH as gasoline (TPH-g) and benzene were detected in soil samples at concentrations of up to 12,500 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 99,900 micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg), respectively. Soil vapor concentrations at this listing collected up to 20 feet bgs were up to 57 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for TPH-g, 490 micrograms per liter (µg/L) for benzene, 640 µg/L for toluene, 560 µg/L for ethylbenzene, and 870 µg/L for total xylenes. TPH-g and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) were detected in groundwater from MW-1 at concentrations of 390 µg/L, 3.7 µg/L, 25 µg/L, 12 µg/L, and 65 µg/L, respectively. In a letter dated July 21, 2009, the San Bernardino County Fire Department (SBCFD) requested a subsurface investigation to be conducted at this listing to further delineate the vertical and lateral extent of petroleum products and associated constituents in soil, groundwater, and in the vicinity of the USTs, evaluate the groundwater flow direction and gradient, and to estimate the volume of impacted soil. On February 10, 2010, Gannett Fleming, Inc. (Gannett Fleming) submitted a Supplemental Site Assessment and Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Pilot Test Work Plan (Section 4.5) in response to SBCFD’s July 21, 2009 letter, which was approved by the SBCFD on August 6, 2010; however, this workplan was not implemented by the September 8, 2010 deadline. On November 23, 2010, the SBCFD transferred the UST cleanup case for this listing to the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). On March 16, 2011, RWQCB staff issued a Notice of Violation to Placo San Bernardino, LLC for failure to comply with electronic report submittal. Additional site assessment activities conducted at the site is discussed further in Section 4.2.6.

Packet Pg. 838
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 7 Table 3 – Summary of On-Site Listings
Business Name Databases Summary
Firestone Stores /
Firestone Store
(BFS#180513)
677 W 4th Street
LUST

SWEEPS UST

CA FID UST

HIST UST
CERS

CORTESE
According to the HIST UST database, four USTs containing regular, unleaded, and premium gasoline, and waste oil were reported on the north-central portion of the site. According to the SWRCB’s GeoTracker database, the site was listed as a closed LUST case (T0607129188) as of March 20, 2008. Site assessment activities conducted from 2002 to 2004 were used to delineate the nature and extent of petroleum hydrocarbon impacts at this listing. Site assessment results indicated that petroleum hydrocarbon impacts were primarily confined to soil. Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in a groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-1 in February 2004, but were detected in a grab groundwater sample from soil boring ESB-11 in August 2004 at concentrations below the RWQCB “low risk” criteria. Petroleum hydrocarbon impact in soil was detected primarily on the eastern portion of the building and canopy area. The vertical extent of impacts was primarily between approximately 15 and 30 feet bgs. Elevated impacts were observed along the eastern side of the building between soil borings SB-1 and ESB11/VEW-2.

Additional site assessment activities conducted at the site is discussed further in Section 4.2.6.

According to the EDR Certified Sanborn Map report (Section 4.4.2), several gasoline and oil stations historically occupied the northern, western, and central portions of the site and were associated with historical site addresses of 398 F Street, 340 G Street, 698 3rd Street, and 729 3rd Street. However, these historical site addresses were not listed on searched environmental databases.

Off-site properties/facilities listed in the database report were evaluated as to their potential to impact soil, soil vapor, and/or groundwater at the site. To supplement the information in the EDR report, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker (SWRCB, 2022) and Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor databases (DTSC, 2022) were reviewed. Information from the EDR database report and supplemental sources is included in the facilities of potential concern summaries below. The following properties/facilities were interpreted to represent a potential environmental concern to the site, based on their proximity to the site, the nature of the database on which they are listed, and/or the assumed direction of the groundwater flow in the site vicinity (southeast).

Table 4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern Facility Name/s
Address
Distance/
Direction from
Site
(Approximation by
EDR)
Database Summary
Jordan Bruce Autos
598 4th Street
Adjoining to the
north EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station (Jordan Bruce Autos) in 1942 and 1949. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Dreblow A H Auto Repr
228 E North
Adjoining to the
north EDR HIST AUTO This listing was listed as an automobile repair shop in 1926. Further information was not provided. This information is not considered an environmental concern.

Hunting Chas Do Clnr
410 N F Street
Adjoining to the
north

EDR HIST

CLEANER
This facility was listed as a historical dry cleaner (Hunting Chas Do Clnr) in 1930.

Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Sherrel H C Gas Sta
599 4th Street
Adjoining to the
north EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station in 1942. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Brown H F Autos
571 4th Street
Adjoining to the
north EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station in 1936 and 1942.

Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Packet Pg. 839
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 8 Table 4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern Facility Name/s
Address
Distance/
Direction from
Site
(Approximation by
EDR)
Database Summary
S B Motor Car Co
713 3rd Street
Adjoining to the
northwest EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station in 1922. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Karr D F Do Clnr
599 4th Street
Adjoining to the
northwest

EDR HIST

CLEANER
This facility was listed as a historical dry cleaner in 1942. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Buster E D Auto /
Stump Chester Auto
Repr
701 3rd Street
Adjoining to the
northwest EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station and gasoline and oil service station (Harrison & Kelty Gas Sta) in 1922, 1926, and 1930, a historical automotive service station (Stump Chester Auto Repair) in 1922, 1926, and 1930), a historical gasoline and oil service station (1936 and 1942), an automobile service station (Buster E D Auto) in 1942, and a gasoline service station (Oline Santa Gas and Ole Nick the Gas) in 1949. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Del George Service
410 N F Street
Adjoining to the
northwest EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical gasoline service station (Del George Service in 1969 to 1976 and Del George Roy from 1978 to 1980 and 1982 to 1983). Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Spence Harvey Do
556 4th Street
Adjoining to the
northeast

EDR HIST

CLEANER
This facility was listed as a historical dry cleaner (Spence Harvey Do) in 1936 and 1942. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Kimball F A Do Cnr
680 4
th Street
Adjoining to the
northwest

EDR HIST

CLEANER
This facility was listed as a historical dry cleaner (Kimball F A Do Cnr) in 1922.

Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Maloof WM Autos
547 4th Street
Adjoining to the
northeast EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station (Maloof WM Autos) in 1936. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

A B C CLNRS
537 4th Street
Adjoining to the
northeast

EDR HIST

CLEANER
This facility was listed as a historical dry cleaner (A B C CLNRS) in 1949. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Holdridge J R Do Clnr
509 4th Street
Adjoining to the
northeast

EDR HIST

CLEANER
This facility was listed as a historical dry cleaner (Holdridge J R Do Cnr) in 1930 and Acme Dry Clnrs) in 1936. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

A 1 Handbag
516 4th Street
Adjoining to the
northeast EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station (A 1 Handbag) in 1949. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Draper Garage
264 North E Street
Adjoining to the
east EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station (Draper Garage) in 1926. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Draper Garage
264 E Street
Adjoining to the
east EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station (Draper Garage) in 1922. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Marcus WM
274 E Street
Adjoining to the
east

EDR HIST

CLEANER
This facility was listed as a historical dry cleaner (Marcus WM) in 1922. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Maruko Hotel
295 N E Street
Adjoining to the
east

SWEEPS UST

CA FID UST
According to the SWEEPS UST database, this facility was listed as having one UST which was installed in September 1988. Further information was not provided.

Based on the direction and absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Cobb F H Serv Sta
318 H
Adjoining to the
west EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station in 1942. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Reddig F E Auto Repr
316 H
Adjoining to the
west EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive repair and service station in 1926.

Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Packet Pg. 840
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 9 Table 4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern Facility Name/s
Address
Distance/
Direction from
Site
(Approximation by
EDR)
Database Summary
Del George Service /
Abandoned UST
(Fairview Ford)
808 3rd St
Adjoining to the
west

EDR HIST AUTO
SAN BERN. CO.

PERMIT
This facility was listed as a historical gasoline and oil service station (Del George Service) in 1942 and an automotive repair station (Del George Bros) in 1949.

According to the SAN BERN. CO. PERMIT database, this facility was listed as having an annual UST inspection permit which expired on April 30, 2003. Further information was not provided the UST at this facility. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Inman Bros Auto
564 2nd Street
Adjoining to the
southeast EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station in 1949. Further information was not provided. Based on the direction and absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Draper Garage
242 E Street
Adjoining to the
southeast EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive garage (Carr F A Garage) in 1936, and an automotive garage and service station (Draper Garage) in 1930. Further information was not provided. Based on the direction and absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site,.

N W COR Gateway
Service Sta
195 E Street
Adjoining to the
southeast EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station (NW COR Gateway Service Sta) in 1926. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Rose Jos Gas Sta
200 E Street
Adjoining to the
southeast EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical gasoline and oil service station (Shell Oil Co.) in 1936, and a historical gasoline and oil service station (Rose Jos Gas Sta) in 1942. Further information was not provided. Based on the direction and absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Arco Petroleum PR50D
/ Prestige Stations In /
Damas Capital Invest /
Arco Petroleum Prod
702 W 2nd Street
Adjoining to the
southwest
HWTS
LUST

CERS HAZ WASTE

SWEEPS UST

CERS TANKS

CORTESE
HAZNET
CERS

HIST UST
CHMIRS

RCRA NONGEN /
NLR
UST
FINDS
ECHO
SAN BERN. CO.

PERMIT
According to the HAZNET database, this facility was listed as generating tank bottom waste. According to the CERS database, several violations were recorded against this facility from 2013 to 2020 for administrative recordkeeping, each of which achieved compliance. According to the SWRCB GeoTracker database, this facility was listed as a closed LUST case as of September 26, 2007. This facility was listed as having one 8,000-gallon gasoline UST, two 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs, and one 550-gallon waste oil UST. These USTs and associated piping and dispensers were removed on December 19, 1991. Subsurface contamination was first encountered in September 1989, while drilling vadose zone wells in conjunction with the installation of a tank pit leak monitoring system. Upon encountering impacted soil, four soil borings (BH-1 through BH-4) were advanced to depths ranging from 40 to 42 feet bgs, which were subsequently converted into groundwater monitoring wells to evaluate potential impacts to underlying groundwater, which was encountered at approximately 37 feet bgs during drilling activities. TPH-g and benzene were detected at 7,900 µg/L and 1,700 µg/L, respectively. As a result, quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling program was initiated at this facility in 1989. Four cone penetrometer test (CPT) borings were also drilled to characterize lithology beneath this facility. Based on this investigation, additional assessment was required to define the extent of soil and groundwater impacts. Between September 1990 and November 2005, several subsurface investigations were conducted at this facility to delineate the vertical and lateral extent of TPH-g, BTEX, and oxygenates in soil and groundwater, which included the installation of 24 soil borings and additional groundwater monitoring wells, 12 sparge wells, and four vapor extraction wells. On January 9, 1991, the tank monitoring system detected a leak in the product delivery line. The source of the leak was reported to be a pin-hole in the elbow fitting beneath the northeast dispenser. The piping leak was excavated and repaired. Following the repair effort, one hand auger boring was drilled and two soil samples were collected at depths of 4 feet and 10 feet bgs, which revealed elevated concentrations of TPH-g and BTEX in the bottom sample, collected at 10 feet bgs, where TPH-g and benzene were reported at 9,600 mg/kg and 170 mg/kg, respectively. In December 1991, remedial excavation was performed to remove impacted soil beneath the former UST structures. Approximately 915 cubic yards of soil were excavated and transported off-property for disposal/recycling. The remainder of the excavated soil was used as backfill material in conjunction with property restoration. In November 2005, two confirmation soil borings were drilled in source areas adjacent to the dispensers and USTs to evaluate residual levels of contamination in soil following remediation. Results from this assessment revealed relatively low levels of residual soil contamination beneath the facility. Results from the quarterly groundwater monitoring program have revealed moderate TPH-g and BTEX and fuel oxygenates concentrations in groundwater beneath this facility. Although liquidphase hydrocarbons (LPH) were intermittently observed between July 2001 and September 2002, the wells subsequently went dry, so subsequent monitoring episodes were not performed. Groundwater results from the recent sampling indicated that the constituents of concern were non-detect. Groundwater flow direction in March of 2003 was estimated as flowing to the west. The facility received case closure in 2007. Based on this information, direction, and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Packet Pg. 841
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 10 Table 4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern Facility Name/s
Address
Distance/
Direction from
Site
(Approximation by
EDR)
Database Summary
Robinson E A Gas
597 2nd Street
Adjoining to the
south EDR HIST AUTO
This facility was listed as a historical gasoline and oil service station (Robinson E A Gas) in 1942. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Family Cleaners / Van
Deventer C B / Family
Dry Cleaners Inc /
Family Dry Cleaners
663 W 2nd Street
Adjoining to the
south

EDR HIST

CLEANER

EDR HIST AUTO

RCRA NONGEN
/NLR

RCRA-SQG
FINDS
ECHO

DRYCLEANERS
SAN BERN. CO.

PERMIT
HWTS

CERS HAZ WASTE
HAZNET
CERS
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station (Van Deventer C B) in 1926, 1942 and 1949, and a historical dry cleaner (Family Cleaners) from 1993 to 2014. This facility was listed as a small quantity generator of hazardous waste in July 1992. According to the HAZNET database, this facility was listed as having generated halogenated solvents from 1995 to 2004, unspecified organic liquid mixture in 2001, and liquids with halogenated organic compounds in 2002.

According to the CERS database, this facility was listed as a chemical storage facility. Several violations were recorded against this facility in 2014, 2017, 2018, and 2021, for administrative recordkeeping, each of which achieved compliance.

Based on the direction, and absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

G & M Oil SS #67 /
Unocal #6968 / G&M Oil
Co. Inc. #67 / Unical 76 /
Union Oil Service ST / G
and M Oil Company /
G&M Oil Co. / Union Oil
Service ST
187 North F Street
Adjoining to the
south
LUST

HIST CORTESE
UST
HWTS
HAZNET
HAZMAT
This facility was listed as a historical gasoline service station (Unocal 76 from 1987 to 1993, Behruz Unocal in 1994, and G&M Oil Co. LLC from 2006 to 2014).

According to the SWRCB GeoTracker database, gasoline-impacted soil was encountered during tank closure activities on September 21, 1987. In a letter dated June 25, 1997, the RWQCB issued a closure to Unocal Corporation for the completion of investigation and remediation of the September 1987 release that occurred at this facility. On June 28, 1999, the San Bernardino County Fire Department referred a second release that occurred at this facility to the RWQCB.

On February 4 and 25, 1999, dispenser and piping upgrade activities were conducted at this facility. Fourteen confirmation soil samples were collected beneath the dispensers and pipelines, and results revealed elevated levels of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in both piping and dispenser areas. Gasolineimpacted soil was subsequently remediated via soil vapor extraction (SVE). The SVE system operated from May 29, 2003 through January 29, 2004. A total of 8,534 pounds of hydrocarbons were recovered. In August 2004, four confirmation soil borings were drilled, and results revealed that impacted soil was limited to the area of the former tank pit. From March 13, 2001 through August 24, 2004, approximately 15 groundwater sampling events were conducted at this facility.

Three years of groundwater monitoring and sampling revealed a decrease in groundwater contamination concentrations. From August 11 to August 13, 2004, four confirmation soil borings were drilled. Three of the four soil borings were converted to wells, MW-12 through MW-14, in order to evaluate the residual groundwater contamination concentrations remaining beneath the property. These wells were located in the historically contaminated areas for both soil and groundwater. Results of the soil confirmation sampling indicated that the maximum concentrations of TPH-g, TPH-d, BTEX, MTBE, and TBA were at 155 mg/kg, 52 mg/kg, 0.314 mg/kg, 1.91 mg/kg, 1.11 mg/kg, 11.8 mg/kg, 0.040 mg/kg, and 0.36 mg/kg, respectively. The last sampling event, conducted in August 24, 2004, revealed maximum concentrations of TPH-g and BTEX in groundwater at 1,460 µg/L, 23.1 µg/L, 66.8 µg/L, 1.9 µg/L, and 225 µg/L, respectively. Concentrations of MTBE or TBA were not detected in groundwater. Groundwater contamination was confined to the area of MW-12. In a letter dated February 8, 2005, the RWQCB issued site closure with regards to soil and groundwater at this facility.

Based on the direction and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Ross Dress for Less
#1435 / Food 4 Less
#301
555 W 2nd St Ste A and B
Adjoining to the
south

RCRA NONGEN/
NLR
HWTS

CERS HAZ WASTE
HAZNET
SAN BERN. CO.

PERMIT
CERS
This facility was classified as “Not a generator, verified” in 2007 and 2014.

According to the CERS database, this facility was listed as a hazardous waste generator of off-specification, aged or surplus organics, other organic solids from 2015 to 2019, and alkaline solution without metals pH >= 12.5 and sewage sludge in 2019. A violation was listed against this facility on March 18, 2019 and August 18, 2020 for administrative recordkeeping, each of which achieved compliance.

Based on the direction, and absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Ricker C H Refrig
665 2nd Street
Adjoining to the
south

EDR HIST

CLEANER
This facility was listed as a historical automotive service station (Ricker C H Refrig) in 1949. Further information was not provided. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Packet Pg. 842
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 11 Table 4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern Facility Name/s
Address
Distance/
Direction from
Site
(Approximation by
EDR)
Database Summary
Best Cleaners / Best
Cleaners, Andrew Kitae
Cho
624 W 4th Street, Ste D
Approximately 306
feet north

DRYCLEANERS

RCRA-SQG
FINDS
ECHO

EDR HIST

CLEANER
This facility was listed as a historical dry cleaners (Best Cleaners) from 1992 to 1995 and 2000 to 2003. According to the FINDS database, this facility was listed as having an inactive permit to operate dry cleaning equipment containing perchloroethylene, which was issued in August 1993, and an expired permit to operate Vapor Recovery Unit Compress & Condense. This facility was listed as a small quantity generator of hazardous waste in 1996 and a large quantity generator in 1987. Violations were not recorded against this facility. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge and distance, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

ST-Consolid. Offices
Bldg / ST California
Dept of Transportation /
Caltrans D-8/Facilities
Service Office /
Caltrans California
Department of
Transportation
464 W 4th St.

Approximately 310
feet northeast
UST
HWTS

CERS TANKS
HAZNET
SAN BERN. CO.

PERMIT
CERS
RCRA

NONGEN/NLR
This facility was classified as “Not a generator, verified” in 2010 and 2019.

According to the CERS TANKS database, this facility was listed as having a UST. According to the HAZNET database, this facility was listed as a hazardous waste generator of other inorganic solid waste in 2014 and asbestos-containing waste in 2016. According to the SAN BERN. CO. PERMIT database, this facility was listed as having an active Hazmat handler, UST only – per year permit and an active regular UST annual inspection permit. According to the CERS database, this facility was listed as a chemical storage facility. Several violations were recorded against this facility from 2014 to 2021 for recordkeeping, each of which achieved compliance. Further details were not provided. Based on the direction, distance, and absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Fairview Ford Sales Inc.
292 North G Street
Approximately 311
feet west

RCRA-LQG
AST

CERS HAZ WASTE

HIST UST

CERS TANKS
FINDS
ECHO
SAN BERN. CO.

PERMIT
CERS
This facility was listed as a large quantity generator of hazardous waste in 1986.

Violations were not recorded against this facility. This facility was listed as having an aboveground storage tank (AST). According to the HIST UST database, this facility was listed for one 500-gallon UST containing waste oil and three 500- gallon USTs containing product, which were installed in 1973. According to the SAN BERN. CO. PERMIT database, this facility was listed as having an active APSA 1,320 to 10,000-gallon FAC Capacity permit, an active hazardous materials 4-10 chemicals permit, and an active large quantity generator permit.

One violation was recorded against this facility in 2019 for administrative recordkeeping, which later achieved compliance. According to the CERS database, this facility was listed as a chemical storage facility. Based on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Texaco Service Station
/ Exxon Service Station
/ Amer Mohamed
797 W 2nd Street
Approximately 611
feet southwest
LUST

HIST CORTESE

SWEEPS UST

HIST UST

CORTESE
CERS
According to the SWEEPS UST database, this facility was listed as having a 6,000-gallon gasoline UST, an 8,000-gallon gasoline UST, a 1,000-gallon leaded gasoline UST, and a 1,000-gallon waste oil UST, which were installed in 1971. According to the SWRCB GeoTracker database, this facility was listed as a closed LUST case as of May 11, 1994. Gasoline-impacted soil was encountered at this facility during UST closure activities which were conducted on January 27, 1993. Concentrations of MTBE were detected in soil samples collected of impacted soil. Gasoline-impacted soil was remediated by means of excavation. Based on the distance, direction, affected media and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

San Bernardino Water
Dept. / City of San
Bernardino Mun. WaterGarage / Water
Department Yard / SB
Water Department Yard
/ San Bernardino Mun
Water Dept
195 N D St
Approximately 616
feet southeast
LUST

RCRA-LQG

HIST UST

CORTESE
CERS
UST

SWEEPS UST

CA FID UST
EMI

CERS HAZ WASTE

CERS TANKS
SAN BERN. CO.

PERMIT
This facility was listed as a large quantity generator of hazardous waste in 2002.

Several violations were recorded against this facility from 2014 to 2020 for administrative recordkeeping. According to the SWRCB GeoTracker database, this facility was listed as a closed LUST case as of July 26, 2006. Gasoline and diesel-impacted soil was encountered at this facility during tank closure activities which were conducted on September 3, 1992. One 1,000-gallon gasoline UST, 1,000-gallon diesel UST, and one 2,000-gallon gasoline UST were removed from this facility on September 11, 1992. Soil borings were advanced, and soil samples were collected to evaluate the extent of soil contamination. Ten groundwater monitoring wells were installed to evaluate the extent of groundwater contamination. Gasoline-impacted soil was remediated via SVE from September 10, 2003 to May 20, 2005. Confirmation soil sampling was conducted on April 18, 2005 which revealed a reduction in contaminant concentrations. The groundwater monitoring wells were dry since February 2004; however, prior to becoming dry, the groundwater monitoring wells revealed a decrease in contaminants of concern in each of the wells. In a letter dated July 26, 2006, the San Bernardino County Fire Department confirmed completion of investigation and remedial action for the USTs at this facility.

Based on the distance, direction, affected media and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Packet Pg. 843
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 12 Table 4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern Facility Name/s
Address
Distance/
Direction from
Site
(Approximation by
EDR)
Database Summary
In-N-Out Burger (former
Gas Stn)
795 West 5th Street
Approximately 774
feet northwest
LUST

CORTESE
CERS
According to the SWRCB GeoTracker database, a former gasoline service station occupied this property between 1936 and 1961. Petroleum hydrocarbon impacts were initially encountered during due diligence investigations performed in conjunction with the proposed redevelopment of the property as an In-n-Out Burger restaurant. Based on the historical presence of a gas station, a series of soil and soil gas investigations were conducted to evaluate the potential presence of any hydrocarbon and/or volatile organic compounds (VOC) impacts beneath the property. Concentrations of TPH-g, ranging from 20 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) to 900 mg/m3, were reported in shallow soil gas samples collected at the eight soil gas locations. Other VOCs, including BTEX, trichloroethylene (TCE), and tetrachloroethylene (PCE), were generally detected at low levels; however, TCE was reported in excess of California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs), at 1,900 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3), in one soil gas sample collected in the vicinity of the former pump island. An approximate 300-gallon UST was encountered at this facility and was later removed in December 2010. On February 14, 2011, three soil borings were drilled in the vicinity of the former waste oil tank to delineate the extent of soil contamination prior to remedial excavation. Each boring was advanced to 12 feet bgs. Two shallow soil samples were also collected in the northern portion of the facility to establish background levels for metals. Based on the results, a 10- foot by 12-foot area was excavated to remove near surface soils from the former waste oil cavity. Soil was initially removed to a depth of approximately 8 feet bgs.

Following this corrective action, confirmation soil samples were collected from each of the sidewalls and the bottom of the excavation. Approximately 63.1 tons of soil were removed from the waste tank area, and the excavation was backfilled with clean fill material. From April 2011 to June 2011, SVE was conducted to mitigate petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil beneath the facility.

Groundwater grab samples were collected in March 2011, and results indicated that underlying groundwater had not been impacted. Based on these findings, the Santa Ana RWQCB issued a No Further Action letter, dated June 1, 2015, for completion of investigation and remedial action for the former waste oil UST.

Based on the distance, affected media, and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Viking Tire / Pete’s
Road Service Inc
747 W Rialto Avenue
Approximately 835
feet northwest
LUST

HIST CORTESE
HWTS

CORTESE
HAZNET
CERS
According to the HAZNET database, this facility was listed as having generated approximately two tons of off-specification, aged or surplus organics in 2015.

According to the SWRCB GeoTracker database, this facility was listed as a closed LUST case as of May 31, 1989. Gasoline-impacted soil was encountered on March 15, 1989 during tank closure activities, and subsequently excavated on April 19, 1989. Further details were not provided. Based on the distance, direction, media affected, and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Inco / Inco Service
Station
796 W 5th Street
Approximately 920
feet northwest

SWEEPS UST

CA FID UST
LUST

HIST UST

CORTESE
CERS

HIST CORTESE
UST
According to the SWRCB GeoTracker database, three USTs and one waste oil UST were removed from this facility in 1995. In December 1990, an environmental investigation was conducted at this facility which reported a petroleum hydrocarbon leak impacting soil. Several investigations were conducted at this facility from 1995 to early 2011. TPH, and to a lesser extent VOCs, were detected in soil samples collected at this facility. An SVE system was installed and intermittently operated between 2001 and 2009, and approximately 27,545 pounds of TPH mass was removed. As part of the investigation activities, four groundwater monitoring wells were installed and monitored in 1999/2000, which detected low levels of TPH-g, BTEX, and MTBE.

Groundwater monitoring continued from 2001 to 2003. Between 2004 and 2009, groundwater samples were not collected due to the wells being dry. In 2010, soil and groundwater confirmation sampling were conducted, and analytical results indicated concentrations of TPH-g, BTEX, and MTBE were below the California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) and below the laboratory detection limits.

Additional soil investigation was conducted in 2011 followed by an SVE massdepletion test to evaluate if the extracted concentration would quickly decrease or could be sustained. Based on the results of the SVE mass depletion test, SVE was selected to remediate the residual TPH and VOCs at this facility. In May 17, 2018, the SWRCB issued a case closure letter, confirming completion of investigation and corrective action for the USTs at this facility. Based on the distance, and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

La Mancha
Development / Mobil
Oil-Parker, Robert / La
Mancha (Former Mobil
SS)
415 W 5th Street
Approximately 926
feet northeast
LUST

CORTESE

SWEEPS UST
CERS
According to the SWEEPS UST database, this facility was listed for four USTs – one 8,000-gallon gasoline UST, one 4,000-gallon leaded gasoline UST, one 4,000-gallon gasoline UST, and a 280-gallon waste oil UST. The media affected was soil and groundwater. A gasoline leak from a corroded tank was encountered at this facility on February 10, 1988. Gasoline-impacted soil was excavated and disposed at an approved location. This facility was listed as a closed LUST case as of June 14, 2001. No further details were provided. Based on this information, direction, and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Packet Pg. 844
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 13 Table 4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern Facility Name/s
Address
Distance/
Direction from
Site
(Approximation by
EDR)
Database Summary
Atchison, Topeka &
Santa Fe Railway
Company
1170 West 3rd Street
Approximately

0.15-mile north
According to the SWRCB GeoTracker database, this property consisted of several properties within the AT&SF right-of-way (ROW). This property was listed as a closed cleanup program case as of May 12, 2015. The AT&SF ROW was occupied by AT&SF railroad tracks and included inactive spurs and side tracks, abandoned an occupied buildings and structures, associated parking areas and vacant land. Companies that operated the ROW included Rugg Lumbar Company, Scheu Manufacturing Company, and Yesterday’s Oak Furniture.

In 1993, a Phase II assessment was conducted at the ROW by Ninyo & Moore for the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission. The assessment included the drilling of sixteen shallow soil borings within the ROW. Analysis of soil samples from two of the borings, B-3 and B-13, indicated the presence of total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbon (TRPH). Boring B-3 indicated TRPH concentrations of 2,240 mg/kg at 0.5 feet and 15.4 mg/kg at 10 feet. Boring B13 indicated TRPH at 521 mg/kg at 0.5 feet and non-detect (ND) at 10 feet.

VOCs were not detected in any of the soil samples above the laboratory detection limits. Lead and arsenic were detected at concentrations above the maximum concentration levels in boring B-6 (arsenic at 73.7 mg/kg and lead at 754 mg/kg) and B-12 (arsenic was ND and lead at 79.9 mg/kg) at 0.5 feet.

On December 14, 1993, Radian Corporation (Radian) obtained soil samples within the proximity of B-6 and B-12. Analytical results of the soil samples from these locations showed lower lead and arsenic levels. Lead was detected at 34 mg/kg and arsenic was detected at 4.1 mg/kg from the boring next to B-6. Lead was detected at 18 mg/kg and arsenic was not detected from the boring next to B-12 at 0.5 feet. Several organochlorine pesticides 4 were detected in soil samples from two borings, B-10 and B-14, but below screening levels. According to Radian, depth to groundwater at this property was between approximately 590 and 655 feet bgs.

On September 20, 1994, the RWQCB, Santa Ana Region, granted closure for this property, citing that available data indicated that significant levels of TPH, metals, and pesticides in soil were not present in the soil that could adversely impact water quality. Based on this information, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Transit Village Core
177 South F Street
Approximately

0.19-mile south US Brownfields
This facility was historically used by the railroad company as a maintenance yard in the 1960-1970s, and may have been used by electric rail cars. This facility was listed as a vacant lot where lead, arsenic, and mercury were reported as metals of potential concern during a 1999 environmental assessment. A Targeted Site Investigation (TSI) is being performed to evaluate if historical environmental activities resulted in hazardous conditions that need further evaluation. This facility is considered for light industrial land use with potential transit-oriented developments. Soil analyses concluded that arsenic concentrations exceeded the Southern California upper-bound background concentration of 12 mg/kg and therefore needs to be addressed before redevelopment. Areas of impacted soil left at this facility should be covered with barriers, and if soil removal is not performed, a deed restriction on these areas should be placed. Based on this information, distance, and direction, and media affected, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Service Station / Allen,
Michael & Brenda /
Allen Property
895 W 2nd Street
Approximately

0.22-mile
southwest

SWEEPS UST

CA FID UST
SAN BERN. CO.

PERMIT
LUST

CORTESE
CERS
On September 15, 2008, the County of San Bernardino Fire Department transferred this case to the Santa Ana RWQCB. The facility had a gasoline release affecting soil. Approximately 52.43 tons of soil were removed from this facility and an assessment of the lateral and vertical extent of contamination was conducted consisting of five borings. Soil results from these borings indicated that contamination was restricted to the upper 25 feet. In 2002, the RWQCB requested additional assessment in the area of EW-1. According to the SWRCB GeoTracker database, the investigation and remedial action for the USTs formerly located at this facility were terminated administratively due to a lack of response from the responsible party. The assessment was considered to be incomplete, and a human health risk has not been assessed for a change in land use. This facility was listed as a closed LUST case as of February 1, 2018.

Based on the distance, direction, and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Packet Pg. 845
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 14 Table 4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern Facility Name/s
Address
Distance/
Direction from
Site
(Approximation by
EDR)
Database Summary
SA Recycling / San
Bernardino Central
Metal Inc / San
Bernardino Recycling
144 S G Street
Approximately

0.24-mile south

RCRA NONGEN /
NLR
HWTS

CERS HAZ WASTE

CERS TANKS
NPDES
SAN BERN. CO.

PERMIT
WDS
CIWQS
CERS
This facility was classified as “Not a generator, verified” in 2007 and 2020.

According to the CERS HAZ WASTE database, this facility was listed as a hazardous waste generator. This facility accepted inorganic solid waste for recycling. According to the CERS TANKS database, this facility was listed as having a petroleum aboveground storage tank (AST). According to the SAN BERN. CO. PERMIT database, this facility was listed as having an active APSA 1,320 to 10,000-gallon FAC Capacity permit, a hazardous materials 4-10 chemicals permit, a large quantity generator permit, and an appliance recycler permit. This facility was classified as an industrial facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid or semi-solid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water pumping.

According to the CERS database, several violations were recorded against this facility in 2014, 2017, and 2021 for administrative recordkeeping, each of which achieved compliance. Based on the distance, direction, and on the absence of reported leaks or unregulated discharge, this facility is not considered an environmental concern for the site.

Unocal #2281 / Union
Oil Service St / Station
2281
300 W 3rd Street
Approximately

0.25-mile east
LUST

HIST CORTESE

SWEEPS UST

CA FID UST

HIST UST
HWTS
HAZNET

CORTESE
CERS
According to the SWEEPS UST database, this facility was listed for two 6,000- gallon gasoline USTs and one 500-gallon waste oil UST. According to the SWRCB GeoTracker database, hydrocarbon-affected soil was reported in the vicinity of the former gasoline USTs in the west-central portion of the facility, extending west toward the property line. Between 1988 and 1992, additional investigations were conducted at the facility. TPH-g and benzene were detected in soil samples analyzed from this facility up to 12,520 and 230 mg/kg, respectively. Groundwater monitoring and sampling were initiated at the facility in November 1988. The groundwater gradient beneath the facility has historically been toward the south. Laboratory analytical data indicated the presence of dissolved-phase hydrocarbons in groundwater beneath the property, extending off-property and downgradient from the facility. Operation of an SVE system was initiated at the facility in August 1994, and continued until October 1995. SVE operations were resumed in March 1997, and continued until December 1997, at which time the SVE system was shut-off due to low influent hydrocarbon concentrations. Approximately 74,400 pounds of hydrocarbons were recovered by SVE from beneath the facility between August 1994 and December 1997.

Post-remediation concentrations of adsorbed-phase hydrocarbons indicated that benzene concentrations were reduced notably from pre-remediation concentrations, and low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples obtained from the off-property confirmation soil boring/monitoring well. In a letter dated December 21, 1998, the Santa Ana RWQCB issued a No Further Action for the facility. Based on this information, direction, and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Signal Oil Co.
173 South G Street
Approximately

0.30-mile south

SEMS-ARCHIVE

ENVIROSTOR
According to the SEMS ARCHIVE database, this facility was listed as having an NPL status of “Not on the NPL” based on existing information. This facility was reported from a 1950 telephone directory as a possible facility handling hazardous substances/wastes. In 1983, facility drive-by was conducted which revealed that this facility was inactive and had a large excavation on the property and four pipes protruding from the ground releasing a petroleum fuel odor, potentially associated with the 600-gallon UST that was removed that year. In a 1988 drive-by, the facility was paved, and a new building was erected and occupied by Erlanger Distribution Center. Phone contacts revealed that this facility was used as a small distribution center for cases of oil. Documentation of hazardous waste generation or disposal was not found on the property.

According to the DTSC ENVIROSTOR database, this facility has a cleanup status of “No Further Action” as of March 31, 1989. Based on this information, distance, direction, and NPL status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Packet Pg. 846
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 15 Table 4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern Facility Name/s
Address
Distance/
Direction from
Site
(Approximation by
EDR)
Database Summary
SB Congress LLC
(Former Southwest
Metal Company) /
Southwest Metal
Company
740 W Congress Street
Approximately

0.32-mile
southwest

ENVIROSTOR
DEED
SEMS

RCRA-LQG
ECHO
According to the DTSC ENVIROSTOR database, this facility is listed with a cleanup status of “Certified O&M – Land Use Restrictions Only” as of September 8, 2016. Southwest Metal is an inactive facility that formerly operated as a secondary lead smelter. Operations began in 1976 and continued until 1981.

Activities consisted of obtaining large amounts of old batteries, disassembling them, draining the battery acid and storing it in several acid pits, and recovering the lead from the batteries. The lead was then smelted in the facility's furnace.

These processes resulted in wastes being generated, including battery casings, acid, lead slag and fly ash. The RWQCB requested the facility to conduct an extensive clean-up that included the removal of hundreds of tons of battery casings and excavation of acid pits that started in 1983 and ended in 1984. The facility was dismantled in 1987 and remained inactive. In 1990, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted a Screening Site Inspection (SSI). Results indicated elevated concentrations of lead (up to 7,700 parts per million), cadmium, chromium, copper, and zinc in soils. Groundwater was encountered at 24.5 feet and releases to groundwater of these contaminants were documented at 30 feet bgs during the SSI. The Voluntary Cleanup Agreement was signed in October 2012. Investigations began in January 2013 and cleanup of impacted soil on- and off-property was conducted in May of 2015.

Contaminated soil was excavated and disposed at a hazardous waste disposal facility. The on-property soil was cleaned up to industrial/commercial levels, and off-property soil was cleaned up to residential levels. The facility was backfilled with clean imported backfill material and capped. Quarterly groundwater monitoring was conducted from July 2013 through June 2016. Groundwater was sampled for TPH-g and full carbon range (C6-C44), Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), and CAM 17 Metals. Groundwater monitoring results indicated that groundwater beneath the facility was not impacted due to property operations. The Land Use Covenant and Environmental Restrictions were recorded with the County of San Bernardino on August 3, 2015. Based on this information, distance, direction, and media affected, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Hanford Foundry /
Hanford Foundry Co
119 South Arrowhead
Avenue
Approximately

0.33-mile
southeast

ENVIROSTOR

CPS-SLIC
VCP
DEED
CERS
SEMS

HIST UST

RCRA NONGEN /
NLR
FINDS
ECHO
According to the DTSC ENVIROSTOR database, this facility is listed with a cleanup status of “Certified O&M – Land Use Restrictions Only” as of February 28, 2007. The facility was owned and occupied by the Hanford Family from 1892 to 1986. The facility produced commercial pumps and cement and oil tool castings using steel, stainless steel or high temperature alloys. Sand and silica were used as molds for casting the metal products. Foundry operations generated wastes including spent sand and silica. Prior to 1986, a laboratory, a steel foundry with a sand-mixing area, a 1,000-gallon fuel UST, a transformer, an office building, sand bins, a scrap storage area and two buildings of unknown operations were located at this facility. In 1986, the onsite structures were demolished, and the equipment was removed from the property. In May of 1982, U.S. EPA conducted a Site Inspection (SI). The purpose of the Preliminary Assessment (PA) and SI was to review existing information on this property to assess any threats posed to public health, welfare, or the environment, and to evaluate if further action under CERCLA/SARA was warranted. After reviewing the PA and SI, EPA decided that further investigation of the facility was necessary. In 1983, the DTSC conducted a drive-by inspection of the site and documented piles of waste material on the eastern portion of the facility and existing buildings. In 1987, soil at the facility was sampled and analyzed prior to selling the property. Analytical results indicated the presence of various metals in surface soils. In 1988, a second DTSC drive-by inspection documented that the site was a vacant lot. In October 1989, DTSC conducted a PA of the facility for U.S. EPA. Analytical results of soil and groundwater samples collected in 1991 during the SI, and soil samples collected during the ESI in March 1995 indicated the presence of chromium and nickel. In July 2004, the Responsible Parties entered a Voluntary Cleanup Agreement. After characterization activities, the property was deemed to be acceptable for use in commercial/industrial scenarios. This property is currently managed under a Land Use Covenant, effective February 2007. Based on this information, distance, direction, and media affected, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Quicksilver Bells
Mercury
1019 W 6th Street
Approximately

0.48-mile
northwest
SEMS
According to the SEMS database, this facility was listed with an NPL status of “Not on the NPL”. The facility is listed as a removal only site with no site assessment work needed. Cleanup at the facility was completed on December 19, 2008. Further details were not provided. Based on the distance and regulatory status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

Packet Pg. 847
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 16 Table 4 – Summary of Off-Site Facilities of Potential Concern Facility Name/s
Address
Distance/
Direction from
Site
(Approximation by
EDR)
Database Summary
Newmark Groundwater
Contamination Bunker
Hill Groundwater Basin
Approximately

0.78-mile north
NPL
SEMS
US ENG

CONTROLS
US INT

CONTROLS
ROD
PRP
According to the NPL database, the Newmark Groundwater Contamination, Bunker Hill Groundwater Basin is listed with an NPL status of “Currently on the Final NPL”. Four municipal supply wells of Newmark Well Field are in an area of approximately 700 square feet bounded by 48th Street, Magnolia Drive, Reservoir Drive, and the San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel in the Muscoy area north of San Bernardino. The San Bernardino Municipal Water Department closed the four wells in the early 1980s when they were found to be contaminated with high levels of halogenated organic chemicals, including PCE and TCE. An August 1986 report by a consultant to the RWQCB reported possible contaminant sources.

The California Department of Health Services installed air stripping towers to remove contaminants from groundwater. The towers were scheduled to be in operation in mid-1988. An additional 10 municipal wells in San Bernardino have also been retired from service due to PCE/TCE contamination. An apparent hydrogeologic barrier, the Pelona Schist outcrop of the Shandin Hills, suggested that contamination of these 10 wells originated from different sources. The closest boundary to the site is approximately 0.79 mile north of the site and upgradient.

Based on the distance, this off-site listing is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

San Bernardino Eng
Sub-Depot
Approximately

0.86-mile south
FUDS

ENVIROSTOR
This facility was listed as an “Inactive – Needs Evaluation as of July 1, 2005. On April 10, 1942, the US Department of the Army leased 70 acres of land from San Bernardino County for a storage and salvage operations facility. Two permits were acquired – one permit with the Pacific Electrical Railway Company allowed the Department of Defense (DOD) use of a railroad spur. The other was an encroachment permit granted by the Division of Highways allowing use of a railroad spur crossing. The property was developed and named San Bernardino Engineer Sub Depot. The preliminary investigation conducted at this property did not reveal evidence of hazardous conditions; however, since the property was used for the storage and handling of explosive materials, a more in-depth investigation was recommended. Based on the distance and direction, this facility is not considered an environmental concern to the site.

It is our opinion that there is a low likelihood that the listings for the other off-site properties listed in the database report represent a REC to the site at the current time. This opinion is based on one or more of the following factors:
• The nature of the database(s) on which the property is listed, and/or because the property was not listed on a database that reports unauthorized releases of hazardous substances;
• Reported regulatory agency status (i.e., case closed); • Reported nature of the case (i.e., soil contaminated only); • Reported distance of the property from the site; and/or • Location of the property in relation to the site with respect to topography or expected groundwater flow direction (southeast).

4.1.2 Non-Geocoded (Unmapped) Listings
Unmapped properties are shown by EDR as Orphan Sites. Twenty unmapped facilities were included in the EDR Radius Map™ report. Based on our reconnaissance of the site vicinity and a review of the unmapped listings, the facilities were not within the applicable search radii and have a low likelihood to have negatively impacted the site.

Packet Pg. 848
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 17

4.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources
According to the ASTM Standard, “if the property or any of the adjoining properties is identified on one or more of the standard environmental record sources, pertinent regulatory files and/or records associated with the listing should be reviewed.” Records were requested from local regulatory agencies for the current site addresses of 144, 160, and 295 Carousel Mall, 605 and 677 West 4
th Street, 144 Central City Mall, and current site APNs of 013-421-134, 013-421-138, 013-422-145, 013-423-127 to -129, 013-429-111, 013-430-120, and 013-430-122. Records were also requested for adjoining properties located at 702 West 2nd Street and 187 North F Street.

The review of regulatory agency records for the site addresses and/or APNs and two adjoining properties are discussed in the following sections. Other off-site facilities of potential concern to the site were reviewed on online environmental databases (i.e., GeoTracker and EnviroStor), which are discussed in Section 4.1.1. Regulatory records for the site are provided in Appendix D.

4.2.1 California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Ninyo & Moore requested records from the DTSC for the current and historical site addresses/APNs and two adjoining properties. According to representatives of the DTSC, files were not found for the current or historical site addresses and/or APNs, or the two adjoining properties. According to DTSC’s online Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS) database, records were found for site address 144 and 295 Carousel Mall, 144 Central City Mall, and the two adjoining properties at 702 West 2nd Street and 187 North F Street. 144 Carousel Mall (Site, Former Montgomery Ward)
According to the DTSC’s Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS) database, this site address was listed as an inactive hazardous waste generator (1X Montgomery Ward) and generated approximately 2.205 tons of hazardous waste in February 1993. Information concerning the type of hazardous waste was not provided. 295 Carousel Mall (Site, Carousel Mall)
According to the DTSC’s HWTS database, this site address was listed as an inactive hazardous waste generator (City of San Bernardino/Facilities Management, Central City Company LTD, Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, LNR San Bernardino LLC DBA Carousel Mall) and generated approximately 0.92 tons of hazardous waste in February 1999, 0.23 tons of hazardous waste in March 2001, 0.69 tons of hazardous waste in November 2004, and 0.31 tons in March 2011. Information concerning the type of hazardous waste was not provided.

Packet Pg. 849
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 18 144 Central City Mall (Site, Former Montgomery Ward Service Center) According to the DTSC’s HWTS database, this site address was listed as an inactive hazardous waste generator (Montgomery Ward, Montgomery Ward #2220, Montgomery Ward Auto Center #2220, Auto Express 2200) and generated approximately 0.04 tons of hazardous waste in August 1993, 0.54 tons of hazardous waste from March to August 1995 and October to December 1995, and 5.45 tons of hazardous waste in September 1998.

Information concerning the type of hazardous waste was not provided. 702 West 2nd Street (Adjoining Property to the Southwest) According to the DTSC’s HWTS database, this adjoining property was listed as an inactive hazardous waste generator (Prestige Station Inc. 507) and generated approximately 0.23 tons of hazardous waste in August 2000. Information concerning the type of hazardous waste was not provided.
187 North F Street (Adjoining Property to the South)
According to the DTSC’s HWTS database, this adjoining property was listed as an inactive hazardous waste generator (Unocal Service Station #6968), and generated approximately

1.05 tons of hazardous waste in March 1993. This adjoining property was also listed as an active generator (G and M Oil Company #067), and generated approximately 0.49 tons in 2000, 5.42 tons in 2001, 2.99 tons in 2002, 3.60 tons in 2004, 1.48 tons in 2005, 0.34 tons in 2006, 0.14 tons in 2007, 0.06 tons in 2008, 0.10 tons in 2009, 0.54 tons in 2010, 0.08 tons in 2011, 0.14 tons in 2012, 0.07 tons in 2013, 0.30 tons in 2014, 0.16 tons in 2015, 0.10 tons in 2016, 0.12 tons in 2018, 0.05 tons in 2019, and 0.15 tons in 2021. Information concerning the type of hazardous waste was not provided.

4.2.2 Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region Ninyo & Moore requested records for the current and historical site addresses and/or APNs and for two adjoining properties from the RWQCB. According to the RWQCB, Santa Ana Region, records are filed by address. Since nine site parcels do not have an associated address, records were not available for these parcels. According to a representative of the RWQCB, Santa Ana Region, files were found on the GeoTracker database for the site address of 677 West 4th Street. Ninyo & Moore’s review of these files are summarized in Section 4.2.6.

Files were available for review for the adjoining property located at 702 West 2nd Street to the southwest of the site. The following summarizes Ninyo & Moore’s review of the available records.

Packet Pg. 850
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 19 Harding Lawson Associates (HLA) prepared a Vapor Extraction Test Data Analysis Summary report dated May 27, 1992. During the test, the induced vacuum was measured at five observation wells to calculate the radius of influence of the extraction test at well BH-2. The vapor extraction data collected indicated that air transmission was present between the extraction well and representative observation wells measured during the two tests. Based on the results of the tests, HLA concluded that SVE would be an effective remedial alternative for treating vadose zone hydrocarbon-impacted soil beneath the property.

On June 4, 1993, Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. (Delta) prepared a Revised Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to reflect existing conditions at the property and to discuss remedial action alternatives not previously considered for the facility. According to the June 1993 CAP, analytical results of soil samples collected during subsurface evaluation activities indicated that soils at this facility were impacted with TPH and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) compounds, with elevated concentrations observed in the vicinity of the former gasoline USTs and the northern fuel dispenser islands. Contoured data suggested that historical releases occurred at the northern end of the former gasoline USTs and at the northern, and possibly southeastern, dispenser islands. Generally, concentrations decreased with depth. Analytical results of groundwater samples indicated that the upper and lower saturated zones were impacted by TPH, BTEX, 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and/or cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE). Historically, the elevated concentrations of TPH, BTEX, and 1,2-DCA were observed in the upper saturated zone, with elevated concentrations observed in the vicinity of the northwestern fuel dispenser island. Four remedial action alternatives were considered: (1) Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) equipped with a thermal/catalytic off-gas treatment system combined with a groundwater extraction/treatment system, (2) Sparge/Vent network equipped with a thermal/catalytic off-gas treatment system, (3) natural biodegradation with continued groundwater monitoring, and (4) no action. After evaluating the remedial action alternatives, Delta recommended a Sparge/Vent network equipped with a thermal/catalytic off-gas treatment system.

On August 26, 1993, the RWQCB, Santa Ana Region approved the remedial action alternative presented in Delta’s Revised CAP with the following considerations: (1) an additional sparge point should be located in the vicinity of BH-1, which exhibited high hydrocarbon concentrations, (2) on-property and off-property monitoring wells are required to observe the effects of the remediation system, and (3) locate and rehabilitate or abandon off-property wells BH-11 and BH-12, which were previously paved over with asphalt.

Packet Pg. 851
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 20 On June 29, 1998, Pinnacle Environmental Solutions (Pinnacle) prepared a Workplan for Well Abandonment to abandon groundwater monitoring well BH-9, located in the southeastern corner of the property. According to Pinnacle, wells that monitored groundwater in the upper aquifer were screened to approximately 39 feet bgs, and wells that monitored the lower aquifer were screened from approximately 55 to 65 feet bgs. The exception was well BH-9, which was screened from 45 to 50 feet bgs. Well BH-9 was observed to be dry or contained less than 1 foot of water since 1991.

Other technical reports reviewed by Ninyo & Moore for this property are summarized in Section 4.1.1.

4.2.3 San Bernardino County Fire Protection District (SBCFPD) Ninyo & Moore requested records from the SBCFPD for the current and historical site addresses and/or APNs, and the two adjoining properties. According to the SBCFPD, files were found for site addresses 144 Central City Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, and 677 West 4th Street, and the two adjoining properties located at 187 North F Street, and 702 West 2nd Street. The following summarizes Ninyo & Moore’s review of the available records:
144 Central City Mall (Site, Former Montgomery Ward Service Center) A UST permit, a Hazardous Material Handler permit, and Hazardous Waste Generator permit from early to mid-1980’s was reviewed for this site listing. A permit dated August 1, 1986 was reviewed for the removal of a 550-gallon waste oil UST from this site listing. The waste oil tank was removed on September 24, 1986.

On July 21, 2009, a Conceptual Remedial Action Plan was prepared by Gannett Fleming Inc. (Gannett Fleming), for the remediation of petroleum-impacted soil at this site listing. Based on the nature and extent of the contamination at this site listing, Gannett Fleming recommended SVE as the remedial method.
295 Carousel Mall (Site, Carousel Mall)
On September 25, 2000, a Hazardous Material Response report was filed against the site.

According to the report, an attempted arson fire at the adjacent property (Harris Building) prompted the request for help in assessing the chemical inventory left behind after closure of the Carousel Mall. The law firm who manages the property was contacted and provided a contractor list and disposal recommendations.

Packet Pg. 852
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 21 On March 25, 2022, a Source Facility Release report was filed against the site. According to the report, a fire and approximately 100 gallons of mineral oil were released inside an electrical room. The fire and mineral oil release were contained to the electrical room, and waterways were not affected. Cleanup was conducted by a contractor and the complaint was closed.

In a letter dated November 23, 2010, the San Bernardino County Fire Department notified Placo San Bernardino, LLC of the transfer of lead regulatory oversight for this case to the RWQCB, Santa Ana Region.
677 West 4th Street (Site, Former JC Penney Service Center) Permits to remove and install a waste oil tank were issued on September 8, 1986 and December 15, 1986, respectively. The single-walled waste oil UST was removed on November 18, 1986 and replaced with a double-walled fiberglass waste oil UST.

On April 2, 1992 an application for the removal of a 550-gallon double-walled waste oil UST was submitted for this site listing. The waste oil tank was subsequently removed on May 5, 1992.
702 West 2nd Street (Adjoining Property to the Southwest) On September 30, 1991, an application for the installation of five and the removal of four USTs was submitted to the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services for this adjoining property. On May 24, 2000, an application for the removal of an UST was submitted for this adjoining property, which was removed on August 4, 2000. On October 9, 2002, June 10, 2008, May 4, 2017, and June 27, 2017, permits were issued for containment and leak detection system modifications to the USTs at this property.

On October 4, 1993, a Complaint Response report was filed against this adjoining property.

According to the report, drums with potentially hazardous waste were stored over 90 days at this facility. Drums were to be hauled off to TPS Technologies Inc. in Adelanto, California for treatment and disposal according to Arco regulations.

On March 15, 2003, Signal Geoscience (Signal) prepared a Fuel Dispenser and Pipeline Removal Confirmatory Soil Sampling Report for this adjoining property. The fuel UST system consisted of four double-walled fuel USTs in a common excavation, six fuel dispensers, and associated piping. The fuel dispensers and pipelines were removed as part of a planned upgrade that included the installation of manways on the tanks, below dispenser containment, Packet Pg. 853
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 22 and continuous double-walled piping. Analytical results for the fuel dispenser and pipeline removal confirmatory soil sampling indicated the presence of an older gasoline leak and/or residual soil contamination after site remediation.
187 North F Street (Adjoining Property to the South)
On March 30, 1998, November 1, 2002, August 2, 2004, July 14, 2005, March 20, 2009, August 2, 2011, and September 5, 2019, permits were issued for containment and leak detection system modifications to the USTs, modifications to fill sumps, installation of spill and overfill equipment, and the removal and replacement of the annual space sensors on the UST system at this property.

A Business Emergency/Contingency Plan dated November 8, 2012 was reviewed for this adjoining property, including a Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Compliance Inspection report, a Secondary Containment Testing report, Overfill Prevention Equipment Inspection report, and Monitoring System Certifications. On June 23, 2005 a Secondary Containment Testing Report form indicated that tank annular seal was damaged and not able to come out; the monitoring certification was not completed until the annular seal was replaced and tested.

According to a UST Inspection Report dated June 3, 2004, violations were recorded against this facility, which included failure to submit an updated Business Plan and Leak Detection, Monitoring and Response Plan, and a damaged spill bucket for diesel was not replaced when required. The diesel UST was to be shut down until the spill bucket was replaced.

A Certificate of Compliance was issued by the San Bernardino County Fire Department for this facility on April 3, 2000 for violations that were corrected.

On September 8, 2000, the RWQCB, Santa Ana Region issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) against this facility for failure to submit the requested information/report.

On October 1995, Emcon prepared a Site Quarterly Status Report July 1 – September 30, 1995. According to Emcon, construction, installation, and startup of the vapor extraction system was completed during the report period. Monitoring data revealed that groundwater levels had dropped approximately 25 feet since 1987, and monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-11 were dry during the July 1 to September 30, 1995 reporting period. Other technical reports reviewed by Ninyo & Moore are summarized in Section 4.1.1.

Packet Pg. 854
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 23

4.2.4 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Ninyo & Moore reviewed the SCAQMD Facility Information Detail Search (FIND) website for records regarding the site addresses. Records were not found for site addresses 605 West 4 th Street and 160 and 295 Carousel Mall; however, records were found for the following site addresses:
677 West 4th Street (Site, Former JC Penney Service Center) • The facility was listed for a permit to operate a soil treat vapor extract gasoline equipment which was issued on May 11, 2006 and is currently inactive. • The facility, Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., Firestone Tire, was listed for a permit to operate CFC-12 Recovery/Recycling (Rule 1411) equipment which was issued on February 7, 1992 and is currently inactive. This facility was also listed for a permit to operate Service station storage & dispensing gasoline, and selective catalytic reduction equipment.

These permits were issued on April 3, 1985 and are currently expired. 144 Central City Mall (Site, Former Montgomery Ward Service Center) • The facility, Montgomery Ward & Co, was listed for a permit to operate Service station storage & dispensing gasoline, and amine (or dea) regeneration equipment, which were issued on March 1, 1983 and are currently inactive.
144 Carousel Mall (Site, Former Montgomery Ward)
• The facility, Montgomery Ward, was listed for a permit to operate an electric charbroiler, and CFC-12 Recovery/Recycling (Rule 1411) equipment. The permits for the electric charbroiler were issued on September 7, 1990 and March 31, 2000 and are currently inactive. The permit for the CFC-12 Recovery/Recycling (Rule 1411) equipment was issued on April 28, 1992 and is currently inactive.

4.2.5 California, Department of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM)
Ninyo & Moore reviewed the CalGEM Well Finder Website for information regarding potential oil and gas wells in the vicinity of the site. The site is not within the administrative boundaries of an oil/gas field. Oil & gas wells were not found within a mile-radius of the site.

4.2.6 Online Regulatory Databases
Online regulatory databases were reviewed by Ninyo & Moore to supplement the environmental database search conducted by EDR. The following is a summary of information.

Packet Pg. 855
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 24 Table 5 – Online Regulatory Databases
Online Database/Website Findings
California Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC)
EnviroStor
The site was not included in the EnviroStor database. Off-site facilities were reviewed on EnviroStor for pertinent information, which are discussed in Table 5 of Section

4.1.1. State Water Resources Control
Board GeoTracker
The site was included in the GeoTracker database. The on-site listings were reviewed for pertinent information, which is discussed in Table 4 of Section 4.1.1. Additional information concerning the former Montgomery Ward Service Center (144 Center City Mall) and the former JC Penney/Firestone Store (677 West 4th Street) are discussed below and presented on Figure 3. Off-site facilities were reviewed on GeoTracker for pertinent information, which are discussed in Table 5 of Section 4.1.1. 144 Central City Mall (Site, Former Montgomery Ward Service Center) On December 11, 2018, Ninyo & Moore submitted a Supplemental Site Assessment and Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Test Work Plan in response to the RWQCB’s October 1, 2018 letter requesting additional assessment in the vicinity of the USTs, clarifier, fuel dispensers and underground piping, and former petroleum operations at the former Montgomery Ward Service Center. In July 2019, Ninyo & Moore conducted a supplemental site assessment (SSA) and a soil vapor extraction (SVE) pilot study at the site listing to evaluate the vertical and lateral extent of TPH-g and BTEX-impacted soils associated with the former USTs, fuel lines, and dispenser island. The SSA consisted of the advancement of six soil borings (SB23 through SB-28); two of the soil borings were converted to two triple-nested SVE wells, and three soil borings were converted into soil vapor monitoring probes (VMPs). Results of the SSA indicated TPH-g in soil at concentrations ranging from non-detect to 14,300 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). During the SSA, borings were advanced up to a depth of approximately 169.5 feet bgs; however, groundwater was not encountered. Results of the SVE Pilot Study indicated that an estimated 35,000 pounds (lbs) of TPH-g was present in the soil beneath the former Montgomery Ward Service Center and an estimated 235 lbs of TPH-g was present in the soil vapor beneath the former Montgomery Ward Service Center from the surface to 80 feet bgs.

On August 27, 2020, Ninyo & Moore submitted a Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and Additional Site Assessment Work Plan to the City of San Bernardino for the former Montgomery Ward Service Center. According to Ninyo & Moore’s August 2020 CSM, the USTs and other potential sources of contamination at the former Montgomery Ward Service Center included three 10,000-gallon former USTs used for gasoline and other TPH products (removed in the mid-to-late 1980s), one 550-gallon former UST used for waste oil (removed in the mid-to-late 1980s), the former dispenser island and associated product piping from the former USTs (piping likely still present), one clarifier located on the northwest side of the facility (still Packet Pg. 856
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 25 present at the site), hydraulic lifts used for vehicle maintenance and repair (still present at the site), and hazardous material storage.

In August 2021, Ninyo & Moore conducted additional site assessment to evaluate the lateral extent of TPH-g impacted soil in the vicinity of the existing clarifier and waste oil tank, and in soil vapor. Results of this additional assessment indicated that one soil sample (SB-30-25) had a TPH-g concentration of 24,500 mg/kg, which exceeded the regulatory environmental screening level (ESL) for TPH-g of 430 mg/kg. Additionally, benzene (0.499 mg/kg @SB-34A40), ethylbenzene (417 mg/kg @SB-30-25) and naphthalene (5.95 mg/kg @ SB-29-22 and 100 mg/kg @ SB-30-25) were the three VOCs that exceeded their respective ESLs in soil.

Based on the on-going assessment activities and open case with the RWQCB, this site listing is considered a REC.
677 West 4th Street (Site, Former Firestone/JC Penney Service Center) According to the ENTRIX, Inc. (ENTRIX) Soil Remediation Report, dated March 28, 2006, three 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs were removed from the site in 1985. The USTs were removed prior to establishment of reporting requirements; accordingly, regulatory records for the removal were not available. A 1,000-gallon waste oil UST was removed in 1986, and the County San Bernardino Environmental Management Group issued a “no further action” letter for the UST. According to the ENTRIX report, an initial assessment was conducted by Calvada Environmental Services in July, 2002. Calvada evaluated areas of environmental concern reported in a previous Phase I ESA, which included a clarifier (observed during the site reconnaissance; Sections 5.2 and 5.4), a former 1,000-gallon waste-oil UST, 13 hydraulic hoists, three former 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs, and the former gasoline dispensing area.

Twelve soil borings were advanced to depths ranging from approximately 10 to 40 feet bgs, with soil samples collected every ten feet. Seventeen soil samples were analyzed for TPH-g and VOCs. Nine of the soil samples were analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH). TPH-g, TRPH, BTEX, n-butylbenzene, isopropyltoluene, 4- isopropyltoluene, naphthalene, n-propylbenzene, and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene were detected in soil samples at various depths between 10 and 40 feet bgs. Of the detected compounds, concentrations of benzene and ethylbenzene exceeded the EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) for industrial land use.

A site assessment was conducted by ENTRIX in February 2004. ENTRIX advanced five soil borings to depths from approximately 40 to 89 feet bgs, installed a soil gas extraction well at a depth of 35 feet bgs, and installed a groundwater monitoring well at a depth of 89 feet bgs.

Groundwater was encountered at approximately 79 feet bgs. Twenty-one soil samples, three Packet Pg. 857
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 26 soil gas samples, and one groundwater sample were collected. Soil samples were analyzed for TPHg and BTEX. TPHg was detected up to 540 mg/kg. Benzene was detected up to

3.1 mg/kg, which exceeded the EPA Region 9 PRG. TPHg and BTEX were not detected in the groundwater sample. A pilot test was conducted at the soil gas extraction well. Levels of detectable analytes in soil gas were reduced from 51,300 to 19,400 parts per million by volume (ppmv) for TPH-g, 1,770 to 851 ppmv for benzene, and 1,450 to 623 ppmv for methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE).

A site assessment was conducted by ENTRIX in August 2004. ENTRIX advanced three soil borings to depths between approximately 41 and 86 feet bgs, installed a soil gas extraction well, and conducted an 8-hour soil gas extraction test. Twelve soil samples, four soil gas samples, and a grab groundwater sample were collected. Soil samples were analyzed for TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE. TPH-g was detected up to 31,000 mg/kg. Benzene was detected up to 120 mg/kg. Detected concentrations of BTEX, 1,2,4-trimethlybenzene, and 1,3,5- trimethylbenzene exceeded their respective EPA Region 9 PRGs for industrial land use. The groundwater sample had detectable concentrations of TPHg and BTEX, with the detected concentration of benzene in groundwater exceeding the EPA maximum contaminant level (MCL). The pilot soil gas extraction test revealed that the level of detectable TPHg was reduced from 68,000 to 59,000 ppmv. Detectable levels of benzene were not reduced in the pilot test. MTBE was not detected in soil gas samples collected in the pilot test. The vertical extents of impacts to soil were limited between approximately 15 and 30 feet bgs. Elevated impacts were along the eastern side of the 677 West 4th Street building.

Soil remediation activities commenced at this site listing on March 18, 2005, in accordance with the Corrective Action Plan dated October 26, 2004, which was approved by the RWQCB in a letter dated November 23, 2004. Soil remediation activities were conducted by ENTRIX to reduce the mass of petroleum hydrocarbons present in soil from approximately 15 to 30 feet bgs in the eastern portion of the site listing. As a remedial option, ENTRIX proposed soil vapor extraction from two soil vapor wells located to the east of the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center, with semi-annual groundwater monitoring from monitoring well MW-1. The remediation system was situated within a fenced enclosure, and the unit was manifolded to vapor extraction wells VEW-1 and VEW-2 which were screened from 15 to 35 feet bgs and 20 to 30 feet bgs, respectively. The system was permitted for various locations by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and was operated in accordance with the permit specifications. The system was in operation between March 2005 and March 2006. Between November 14, 2005 and January 31, 2006, the remediation system extraction was modified to not extract from VEW-2, since elevated soil vapor Packet Pg. 858
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 27 concentrations were emanating from VEW-1. On January 31, 2006, the system operation was modified to extract from both VEW-1 and VEW-2 again. Due to the one-year time limit on the SCAQMD Various Locations permit, the system was subsequently shutdown on March 14, 2006. An application for a site-specific permit was submitted in March 2006. Findings of the soil remediation system performance between startup on March 18, 2005 and shut down on March 14, 2006, indicated that the system soil vapor influent concentrations had decreased from a concentration of 34,000 ppmv for TPH-g in a sample collected after system start-up to concentrations ranging between 820 and 1,900 ppmv between January 5, 2006 and March 14, 2006.

A request for site closure was submitted to the RWQCB on March 28, 2006. In September 2007, two soil borings were advanced, with one soil boring converted into VEW-3 and the other soil boring converted into MW-2. Soil remediation activities at this site listing were suspended pending a decision on the closure request. In a letter dated March 20, 2008, the RWQCB confirmed completion of the site investigation and remedial activities and granted No Further Action (NFA) related to the USTs. On April 28, 2008, monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 and VEW-1 through VEW-3 were abandoned in accordance with the San Bernardino County requirements by grouting from the bottom of the well to 5 feet bgs with cementbentonite grout, over-drilling the upper 5 feet, and backfilling with cement-bentonite grout.

Between April 29 and April 30, 2008, the former remediation system infrastructure was removed. The closed LUST case at the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center is considered a HREC. Records indicating subsurface evaluations for the current clarifier at the former service center were not found. The presence of a three-stage clarifier at this site listing is considered a REC for the site. The underground hydraulic lists are further discussed in Section 5.2.

4.3 Physical Setting
The following table summarizes topographic, geologic, and hydrogeological conditions in the vicinity of the site, based upon the referenced documents review and/or our visual reconnaissance of the site.

Packet Pg. 859
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 28 Table 6 – Physical Setting
Physical
Settings Reference Summary
Topography A,B
The site elevation is approximately 1,060 feet above mean sea level (MSL). The site vicinity is relatively flat, with regional topography sloping gently to the southeast.

Geology C,D
The site is located within the San Bernardino Valley, south of the San Bernardino Mountains, comprising part of the Transverse Ranges. The San Bernardino Mountains are approximately northwest-southeast trending. The mountains were uplifted by left-lateral motion along the San Andreas Fault Zone and reach elevations of 11,502 feet at the San Gorgonio Peak. San Bernardino Mountain Lithology consists largely of quartz diorite, quartz monzonite, granodiorite, a banded gneiss, schists, and intrusive rocks. The site is underlain by young alluvium characterized by slightly to moderately consolidated silt, sand, and gravel deposits.

Surface Water E
Surface water bodies are not present on the site. The nearest surface water body is a 6.62- acre riverine habitat, Warm Creek, which is approximately 0.25 miles southeast of the site.

Groundwater D, F
The site is located within the Bunker Hill Groundwater Basin Sub-basin, which encompasses the San Bernardino Valley Area. Water drawn from local shallow aquifer is generally of poor quality. Water intended for potable use is pumped from the Bunker Hill Basin at depths of several hundred feet. The Bunker Hill Sub-basin recharges primarily from surface water runoff from the San Bernardino Mountains.

According to GeoTracker, recent groundwater information for the site was collected in November 2007, when groundwater was encountered during a subsurface evaluation at approximately 104 feet bgs (B&C, 2007b). According to the DTSC EnviroStor website, groundwater was measured between 130 and 132 feet bgs in a monitoring well at SB Congress, LLC (former Southwest Metal Company at 740 Congress Street), approximately 2,200 feet south of the site, in September 2014. During a previous site assessment in August 2019, groundwater was not encountered at depths of up to 169.5 feet bgs. It is probable that previous evaluations into groundwater at the site were drawing from a perched zone during a time when groundwater was present. Groundwater is anticipated to flow to the southeast, in the general direction of regional topography.

References:

A – Google Earth™
B – United State Geological Survey, 2018, San Bernardino South and North Quadrangles, California 7.5 Minute Series C – USGS National Geologic Map Database, 2022, MapView, https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/mapview/?center=-118.33,33.934&zoom=15, accessed in April.

D – Ninyo & Moore’s, 2020, Conceptual Site Model and Additional Site Assessment Work Plan, Former Montgomery Ward Service Center, 144 Central City Mall, San Bernardino, California, dated August 27.

E – United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory, 2022, Wetlands Mapper website (https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html) accessed in April.

F – State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), 2022, GeoTracker webpage http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/., accessed in April.

4.4 Site Historical Use Information
Ninyo & Moore conducted a historical record search for the site. This included a review of city directories, historical fire insurance maps, historical aerial photographs, topographic maps, and building department records. The following sections summarize information obtained from the historical sources utilized for this assessment.

4.4.1 City Directories
Available historical reverse street directories from 1922 through 2017 were researched by EDR. The site addresses 160 Carousel Mall and 144 Central City Mall were not listed on the city directories. The site and adjoining property addresses were listed for the following:
144 Carousel Mall (Site, Former Montgomery Ward)
• 2003: Portrait Solutions
Packet Pg. 860
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 29 • 1994, 1999: Floodman G Allen Optometrist in Montgomery Ward, G Allen Floodman OD • 1994, 1996, 1999: Miracle Ear Centers, Miracle Ear Hearing Center • 1999: Montgomery Ward & Company Apparel Store, Montgomery Ward & Company Electric Avenue, Montgomery Ward & Company Other Departments, Montgomery Ward & Company Rooms & More
• 1999: Montgomery Ward & Company Auto Express
• 1999: Montgomery Ward Portrait Studio
• 1994: Associated Family Photography
• 1994: Cole National
• 1994: Montgomery Ward AC
• 1994: Pro Jersey of San Bernardino
295 Carousel Mall (Carousel Mall)
• 2008: Asthar International Spa
• 2003, 2008: Bayside Watch
• 2008: Cardtronics
• 2008: Jackson Hewitt Tax Service
• 2003, 2008: Michelles Jewelry
• 2008: Pauline Design Inc.
• 2008: Yu Me Café
• 2003: Alices BTQ Antiques Collectable & Gift
• 2003: Empire Café
• 2003: Wireless Connection
• 1996: Building
• 1996: Carousel Mall
• 1996: Interstate Antiques
• 1996: Mrs Fields Cookies
605 West 4th Street (Former JC Penney Service Center)
• 2003, 2008: XXXX (not listed)
• 1970: San Bernardino Branch
• 1955: Donson Jos
677 West 4th Street (Former JC Penney Service Center)
• 2003, 2008: XXXX (not listed)
• 1994: Firestone Tire & Svc Ctr
Packet Pg. 861
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 30 • 1991: Central City Mall
• 1991: Firestone Master Care Service Centers San Bernardino • 1949, 1955: Cavender J M, Cavender J M 2d hd
• 1955: Valenzuela Nieves
• 1942: Swaim L E
• 1936: Haley L W
• 1930: Sullivan A J
• 1922: Carson W S
• 1922: Clute W G
702 West 2nd Street (Adjoining property to the Southwest) • 2003, 2004, 2008, 2009, 2014, 2017: In & Out Smog Test Only, In & Out Smog • 2017: AMPM
• 2014: Arco Gas
• 2009: Totally Hair & Nail
• 1975, 1981, 2004, 2009: Prestige Stations Inc., Prestige Stns Inc • 2008: Stein Veda
• 2004: Occupant unknown
• 2003: Verdi Mehran
• 1994, 1996, 1999: Smog Pros
• 1991: MP & G Tune Up Center
• 1981: Stevens R E
187 North F Street (Adjoining property to the South)
• 2017: 24/7 Locksmith
• 2014: Chevron Station San Bernardino
• 2009: Chv G&M Oil LLC
• 1996: Shirdel S Unocal
• 1994: Mc Clellans Unocal
• 1981: Fotowat Corp
• 1981: USA Petroleum Corp
• 1955: Am Feed & Fuel Co
A copy of the City Directory Report is provided in Appendix E.

Packet Pg. 862
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 31

4.4.2 Sanborn® Fire Insurance Maps
Various Sanborn® Fire Insurance maps were provided for the site and vicinity from 1885 to 1969. The Certified Sanborn Map Report is provided in Appendix E.

Table 7 – Sanborn® Fire Insurance Maps Summary
Date Summary
1885
The central and western portions of the site were unmapped. Two artesian wells were depicted on the northeastern portion of the site. A lumber yard was depicted on the southeastern corner of the site. The road, E Street (formerly Salt Lake) was depicted adjoining the site to the east, and 3rd Street, was depicted traversing the east-central portion of the site. San Bernardino Brewery was depicted adjoining the site to the north. A hotel and residential dwellings were developed adjoining the site to the east. The County Courthouse and jail were developed northeast, adjoining the site. 1887
1888
1891
In 1887, the Russ Lumbar and Mill Co. was depicted on the southeastern portion of the site. The road, F Street, was depicted traversing the site from north to south, and Court Street and 3rd Street were depicted traversing the site from east to west. A paint shop was depicted west of 3rd Street and F Street. Livery and feed yards and a wood and coal yard were observed on the east-central portion of the site. Residential dwellings and carriage repositories were developed on the central and eastern portions of the site. By 1887, a lumber yard was developed adjoining the site on the northeastern corner, and the St. Charles Hotel was developed adjoining the east-central portion of the site. The road, 4th Street, was depicted adjoining the site to the north, and 2nd Street was depicted adjoining the site to the south. By 1888, a Grand Rapids Furniture Company was developed on the northwest corner of 3rd Street and F Street, and a skating rink was developed on the northeastern portion of the site. By 1891, the Southern California Soap Co. was depicted on the southeastern corner of the site. The western portion of the site was unmapped in the 1887, 1888, and 1891 Sanborn® Fire Insurance maps.
1894
1906
By 1894, the Redlands Colton & Riverside Motor Line was depicted traversing and terminating in the southeastern portion of the site. A laundry shop was developed on the southeastern corner of 3rd Street and F Street, and a machine shop was developed east of G Street and adjoining 3rd Street. By 1906, Santa Fe Steam Laundry was developed on the southeastern corner of G Street and 3rd Street. By 1906, the Southern Pacific Railroad Yard was depicted on the southeastern portion of the site, with railroad rights-of-way traversing the southeastern portion of the site. An auto repair shop and the San Bernardino Steam Laundry were developed on the northeastern portion of the site. By 1906, the adjoining property to the north, south, and west were primarily residential, with the exception of the San Bernardino Lumber & Box Co. which was developed adjoining the site to the south, and the J.B. Gill Lumber Co. which was developed on the southwestern portion of the site and adjoining property. By 1906, a hospital was developed at the site, on the southeastern corner of 4th Street and F Street.
1950
1951
1953
1954
By 1950, an auto repair and painting shop was developed on the southeastern corner of the site. The Sears Roebuck & Co. Department store was developed on the southeastern portion of the site, and the Harris Co. Department store adjoining the site to the east. The Pacific Electric Freight Station was developed within the Southern Pacific Railroad Yard. Berkeley Avenue and Baptist Alley were depicted on the southwestern portion of the site. Auto repair and metal paint spray booth shops were developed on the southwestern and northwestern corners of F Street and Baptist Alley. A neon sign manufacturing and painting shop was developed on the southeastern corner of Baptist Alley and G Street. A dry cleaner was developed north of Baptist Alley and Berkeley Avenue. Several auto repair and paint spray booths were developed on the northern portion of the site. By 1950, two gasoline and oil stations and auto repair shops were developed within the west-central portion of the site, and a third gasoline and oil service station and auto repair shop were developed at the site on the southwestern corner of 4th Street and F Street. A used auto sales lot was developed at the site, on the southeastern corner of 4th Street and F Street. An auto sales lot was developed adjoining the site on the northeast corner of 4th Street and F Street. An auto repair shop and gasoline and oil service station were developed adjoining the site to the west. Gasoline and oil service stations were developed adjoining the site to the southeast and on the northeastern and southeastern corners of E Street and 2nd Street. By 1950, the Courthouse and jail were removed.

By 1953, the Southern Pacific Railroad Yard, including the Pacific Electric Freight Station and associated railroad rightsof-way were removed from southeastern portion of the site. By 1954, a large rectangular building and parking lot were developed north, adjoining the site.
1956
1957
1958
1959
By 1956, and a gasoline and oil service yard was developed adjoining the site to the west, and a gasoline and oil service station was developed at the site on the southwestern corner of 3rd Street and G Street. The gasoline and oil service station on the southwestern corner of Court and G Street was removed. The auto repair and painting shop on the southeastern corner of the site was removed by 1956. By 1956, the auto sales lot that was developed adjoining the site on the northeast corner of 4th Street and F Street was removed and replaced with Gas Co. offices. A parking lot was developed on the south-central portion of the site. By 1957, the commercial properties adjoining the site to the southeast were removed, and by 1958 a bank was developed adjoining the site, on the southwest corner of E Street and 2nd Street.

By 1959, the gasoline and oil service station adjoining the site to the east was removed.

Packet Pg. 863
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 32 Table 7 – Sanborn® Fire Insurance Maps Summary
Date Summary
1961
1963
By 1961, the auto sales lot that was developed at the site, on the southeastern corner of 4th Street and F Street was removed and replaced with a parking lot. The commercial properties adjoining the site, on the southeastern corner of 2nd Street and F Street were removed.
1969 An office and parking lot was developed adjoining the site, on the southeastern corner of 2nd Street and F Street.

Rails spurs were developed in the southeastern portion of the site from 1894 to 1953.

Equipment and materials often historically used in association with railroads, such as lead, ballast materials containing steel slag with potential regulated heavy metal concentrations, total petroleum hydrocarbon fuel leaks, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) leaks, and railroad lubricators utilizing petroleum products, may have been used within the site. In addition, herbicides were often historically applied on railroad ROWs to prevent the growth of vegetation between railroad tracks. Therefore, the presence of railroad rights-of-way (ROWs) on the site is considered a REC.

Dry-cleaning facilities were developed in the central portion of the site (south of the Montgomery Ward building) and western portion of the site (southwest of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center) from 1950 to 1969. The presence of former dry-cleaning facilities on the site is considered a REC.

Gasoline service stations were developed in the northern portion of the site (east of the former JC Penney Service Station), in the western portion of the site (west of Montgomery Ward building, southwest of the Montgomery Ward building), and on the western edge of the site (intersection of West 3rd Street and North G Street) from 1950 to 1969.

Paint spray booths, associated with auto repair facilities, were developed in the central portion of the site (south of the Carousel Mall) and in the northeastern portion of the site (western portion of the parking structure) from 1950 to 1959. In addition, two body works and paint spraying facilities were developed in the western portion of the site (west of the former Montgomery Ward building) from 1950 to 1969. The presence of former paint spray booths and auto paint spraying facilities on the site is considered a REC.

A plating facility was developed in the western portion of the site (west of the Montgomery Ward building) from 1950 to 1969. The presence of a plating facility on the site is considered a REC.

Packet Pg. 864
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 33

4.4.3 Historical Aerial Photographs
Historical aerial photographs were provided by EDR for select years from 1930 through 2016.

A 2021 aerial photograph was reviewed online using Google Earth™. A listing of the photographs reviewed and summary of notable observations from the photograph review are provided in the table below. EDR-provided aerial photographs are included in Appendix E.

Table 8 – Aerial Photographs Summary
Date Source Site Summary Site Vicinity Summary
1930 A
The site was developed as industrial,
commercial, retail, and residential properties.

West 3
rd Street and Court Street are depicted
running west to east through the site. Berkeley
Avenue is depicted running through the
southern portion of the site, and North G Street
and North F Street are depicted running north
to south across the site. A rail yard was
developed in the southeast portion of the site.

The site was bound to the north by West 4th Street, to the south by West 2nd Street, to the east by North E Street, and to the west by North H Street. The site vicinity was developed with industrial, commercial, retail and residential properties, and a railroad yard to the south of the site.
1938
1949 A
Two gasoline service stations were developed
in the northern portion of the site (one removed
by 1949), and three gasoline service stations
were developed in the western portion of the
site.

The site vicinity to the southeast was developed with
additional commercial structures. The site vicinity to the northeast was developed with additional commercial
structures and a parking lot.
1953
1959
1966
A
By 1953, a large parking lot was developed on the
southeastern portion of the site. By 1959,
additional parking was developed on the southcentral portion of the site.

By 1959, the I-215 Freeway was developed west of the site.

Buildings adjoining the site to the southeast were demolished and replaced with a parking lot. A commercial building and associated parking lot was developed adjoining the site to the north. By 1966, additional buildings were depicted north of the site. Additional parking lot was developed adjoining the site to the south.
1968 A
By 1968, the majority of the buildings on the
northern and southwestern portions of the site
were demolished.

A majority of the buildings on the adjoining properties to the west were demolished. Several buildings on the adjoining properties to the north and south were demolished.
1974 A
The site was depicted with the current site
buildings, developed with two structures on the
northern and northwestern portions of the site,
a multi-level parking garage on the
northeastern portion of the site, the Carousel
Mall building in the central portion of the site,
and parking lots encircling the mall.

By 1974, a gasoline station was developed adjoining the site to the south, along with a large rectangular commercial building.

The majority of the residential structures and buildings on the adjoining property to the south were demolished. A gasoline station was also developed adjoining the site to the southwest.

By 1974, the Fairview Ford building was developed adjoining the site to the west. The majority of the structures adjoining the property to the northwest were removed. A large commercial building and parking structure was developed adjoining the site to the southeast.
1985
1989 A
The site was similar to that observed in the
1974 aerial photograph.

Shopping centers were developed adjoining the site to the north, south, and southwest. A hotel was developed adjoining the site to the northwest.
2006
2009
2012
2016
A
The site was similar to that observed in the
1989 aerial photograph.

By 2006, a performing arts theatre and movie theatre were developed adjoining the site to the northeast.
2021 B
The site was depicted similar to that observed
during the site reconnaissance.

The site vicinity was similar to that observed during the site reconnaissance.

Sources:

A – Environmental Data Resources, Inc.

B – Google Earth™
By 1930, the site was developed as industrial, commercial, retail, and residential properties.

By 1974, the site was developed by with two structures on the northern portion (Former Firestone Store at 677 West 4th Street) and the northwestern portion (Former Montgomery Packet Pg. 865
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 34 Service Station at 144 Central City Mall) of the site. According to available records, the USTs, dispensers, and associated piping at these two site listings were removed (Section 4.2.6).

However, the presence of clarifiers at these locations presents a REC for the site.

4.4.4 Historical Topographic Maps
Historical topographic maps for select years between 1896 and 2018 were provided by EDR from the San Bernardino (1896, 1898, 1901, 1942), San Bernardino North and San Bernardino South (1954, 1967, 1973, 1975, 1980, 2012, 2015, 2018), and Colton (1938, 1943) California Quadrangle Maps. Copies of the historical topographic maps are included in Appendix E.

Table 9 – Historical Topographic Maps Summary
Date Site Summary Site Vicinity Summary
1896
1898
1901
The site was depicted as vacant land.

The Redlands Colton & Riverside
Motor Line railroad track was depicted
traversing the southeastern portion of
the site. The site is bound to the north
by West 4th Street, to the south by
West 2nd Street, and to the east by
North E Street. Court Street, North G
Street and 3rd Street were depicted
traversing the site.

The site vicinity consisted of scattered residential properties.

The Southern California and Southern Pacific railroad tracks were present approximately 0.25-mile south and 0.20-mile southeast of the site, respectively. The AT&SF Railroad shops, was present approximately 0.28-mile northwest of the site. Lytle Creek Wash was present approximately 0.61-mile southwest of the site.
1938
1942
1943
1954
1967
The site was shaded for urban
development by 1942. By 1943, a
railroad station was present on the
southeastern portion of the site. By
1954, the railroad tracks were not
present on the southeastern portion of
the site.

The San Bernardino Court House was present approximately

0.31-mile east of the site. By 1967, the I-215 (San Bernardino Freeway) was depicted approximately 0.09-mile west of the site.
1973
1975
1980
By 1973, the site was developed with
the current site structures: two
structures on the northern and
northwestern portions of the site, a
multi-level parking garage on the
northeastern portion of the site, the
Carousel Mall building in the central
portion of the site, and parking lots
encircling the mall.

By 1973, structures were developed on the adjoining properties to the southwestern and northwestern of the site. By 1973, North G Street was reconfigured to its current orientation, and 3 rd Street and Court Street were no longer traversing the site. 2012
2015
2018
The site was depicted similar to its
current configuration. Structures were
not depicted on the site.

The site vicinity was depicted similar to its current configuration.

4.4.5 Building Department Records
Building department records were searched through the City of San Bernardino Document Management System online database for the site addresses. Permits were not found for site address 144 Carousel Mall Street. Records for site address 160 Carousel Mall were found under the address 160 Central City Mall. The following permit records were noted under various site property addresses.

Packet Pg. 866
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 35 144 Central City Mall (Former Montgomery Ward Service Center) • 10/09/97 – Zoning Verification Review.
• 12/18/95 – Permit application to remove and re-roof building. • 09/13/94 – Permit application for inspection
• 09/30/88 – Permit application to repair face of pole sign. • 09/24/87 – Certificate of occupancy – Lake Mathews Nursery • 06/19/86 – Building permit application to re-roof.
• 12/23/85 – Electrical permit application for electrical wiring and install plumbing fixtures. • 07/20/83 – Building permit application to remodel the interior of the commercial building. • 01/15/79 – Building permit application to re-roof commercial building. • 11/18/77 - Certificate of occupancy – Jerry Tulak.
• 04/20/77 - Certificate of occupancy – Pearson & Maynes Entr., Inc. • 03/02/76 – Permit application to install 44 linear feet of an 8-foot high interior non-bearing partitions with metal studs.
• 08/25/75 – Building permit application to move 8-foot by 10-foot wall, move 7-foot by 10- foot partition, and construct separation wall.
• 01/02/73 –Certificate of occupancy – Dr. Robert W. Marshall • 09/27/72 – Permit application to construct new signs. • 07/07/72 – Application for a building permit to construct the foundation and Montgomery Ward retail store.
• 07/07/72 – Certificate of occupancy – Maxim’s Beauty Sales, Inc. • 06/08/72 and 07/19/72– Certificate of occupancy – Montgomery Ward. • 12/29/71 – Application for a building permit to install automatic fire sprinklers. • 12/6/71 and 02/18/72 – Application for an electrical permit. • 11/29/71 – Application for heating, air conditioning and refrigeration permit to install 2 refrigeration units, 8 exhaust fans, 3 space heaters, 2 AH units, 28 strip heaters, 1 compressor.
• 10/20/71 – Application for an electrical permit to erect one temporary pole. • 10/13/71 – Application for plumbing permit to construct 22 water closets, 47 lavatories, 1 dishwasher, 3 water heaters, 5 urinals, 2 drinking fountains, 25 floor sink drains, 2 slop sinks, 2 disposal and 1 sewer.
• 07/11/90 – Application to install a new sign.
160 Carousel Mall (Central City Mall)
• 09/12/77 – Certificate of Occupancy – Ivan & Tangie Waldmann • 04/09/73 – Application for a sign permit for new signs. • 04/13/73 – Certificate of Occupancy – J.C. Penney Co. • 02/09/73 and 04/27/73 – Application for Certificate of Occupancy – J.C. Penney Co.

Packet Pg. 867
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 36 • 03/26/73 – Permit application to install a new sign at the 2nd Street parking lot entrance. • 07/31/72 – Building permit application for the installation of fire sprinkler system. • 03/08/72 – Application for plumbing permit to install 33 water closets, 39 lavatories, 1 shower, 4 kitchen sinks, 4 water heaters, 6 urinals, 6 drinking fountains, 66 floor sinks/drains, 5 slop sink, 1 sewer, and 1 water softener. • 01/24/72, 02/16/72, and 03/06/72 – Applications for an electrical permit. • 01/13/72 – Permit application for heating, air conditioning, and refrigeration permit. • 12/30/71 – Application for building permit to construct auto accessories sales building including gasoline sales.
• 09/12/72 and 09/13/72 – Application for Certificate of Occupancy - MACCA 295 Carousel Mall (Carousel Mall)
• 09/09/98 – Permit application for the installation of new signs. • 12/12/91 – Permit application to remodel storefront.
• 01/25/01 – Correction notice – wires holding up T-bar and lights cannot be touching auxiliary ducts, compression posts required at all rooms/areas, and install sprinkler bars. • 01/18/01 – Correction notice – men and women’s bathrooms, handicap toilet shall be 18” to center of closet flanges.
• Correction notice – provide City stamped plans onsite when requesting an inspection. • 09/05/96 – Permit application for the installation of framing, drywall and doors. • 08/01/96 – Correction notice for the repair of electrical shortage at disconnect switch under canopy, and to provide approved plan and job card or site at the time of inspection. • 07/19/96 – Correction notice – ok to temporarily open for business, pending final electrical inspection.
• 07/08/96 – Permit application for the installation of a door. • 06/26/96 – Permit application for general wiring.
• 04/10/96 – Electrical permit application for installation of illuminated signs. • 03/01/96 – Permit application for the installation of a non-bearing demising wall. • 02/06/96 – Permit application for the installation of a channel letter sign. • 08/23/95 – Permit application to install 3-ton A/C unit. • 05/08/95 – Permit application to construct offices, storage, metal studs, drywall, electricity, and relocate HVAC system.
• 01/18/95 – Electrical permit application for the installation of a neon channel letter. • 11/23/94 – Installation of 12 lights in the mall.
• 10/20/94 – Permit application for the installation of a Ferris wheel. • 12/03/92 – Permit application for the installation of a sound system and two A/C outlets. • 10/12/92 – Permit application for the construction of a wall sign. • 09/11/92 – Permit application for the construction of an office building.

Packet Pg. 868
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 37 • 02/27/92 and 10/08/92 – Building Development Permit Inspections. • 01/09/92 – Permit application for the remodeling of the storefront and the installation of 30 light fixtures.
• 06/04/91 – Building Development Permit for the wiring of 2 electrical panels, plumbing or two fixtures, piping, and drinking fountains.
• 06/19/90 – Permit application to construct a grid system. 605 West 4th Street (Former JC Penney Service Center)
• 04/06/70 – Permit application to install new signs.
677 West 4th Street (Former JC Penney Service Center)
• 05/15/2013 – Application to demolish two-story, 24-unit apartment building with basement.
• 04/17/84 – Certificate of Occupancy – The Sherwin-Williams Co. • 04/05/84 – Permit application for sink and sewer alterations. • 03/16/84 – Permit application for interior alterations. • 02/24/84 – Permit application for interior alterations. • 01/12/84 – Permit application for the replacement of two 4-foot by 30-foot signs. • 05/17/83 – Permit application for the replacement of signs and electricity. • 04/20/73 – Permit application for the installation of new signs. • 02/21/73 – Application for Certificate of Occupancy – J.C. Penney Co. retail sales and service.
• 09/30/64 – Commercial Building Permit.
• 09/29/64 – Application for Certificate of Occupancy – parking lot. • 01/06/64 – Permit application to install two sewer caps.

4.5 Previous Reports
The following sections summarize previous reports for the site that were provided to Ninyo & Moore for review. Copies of the reports are provided in Appendix B.

Brown and Caldwell (B&C) – October 30, 2007 Phase I ESA The Phase I ESA reported the first use of the site as residential and downtown commercial in the 1880’s. Between 1956 and 1969 several historical buildings located on the site were reported in Sanborn fire insurance maps as being used as automotive service centers, gasoline stations, plating and painting businesses, and dry cleaners. In 1972, the industrial, commercial, and residential structures were replaced by the Carousel Mall, which included Montgomery Ward and JC Penney as tenants. Both Montgomery Ward and JC Penney operated automotive service and Packet Pg. 869
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 38 gasoline service stations on the western portion of the site. Montgomery Ward and JC Penney ceased operations at the site in 2001 and 2003, respectively.

The B&C Phase I ESA reported the former presence of historical gasoline USTs, a gasoline dispensing island, a waste oil UST, a three-stage concrete clarifier and hydraulic lifts at the former Montgomery Ward Service Center at 144 Central City Mall as RECs. The past use of the site by several automotive repair facilities, gasoline service stations, dry cleaners, and paint facilities which likely used hazardous substances as part of their operations was reported as a REC. Soil and groundwater impacted with gasoline-related TPHs at the former JC Penney/Firestone service center was reported as a REC (case closed by the RWQCB, Santa Ana Region, Section 4.2.6).

Gannett Fleming, Inc. (Gannett Fleming) – February 10, 2010 Supplemental Site Assessment and SVE Pilot Test Work Plan
Gannett Fleming prepared a Supplemental Assessment and SVE Pilot Test Workplan (the Workplan) was prepared to provide additional vertical and lateral delineation of gasoline-impacted soil, evaluate the groundwater gradient, and to estimate the volume of impacted-soil at the former Montgomery Ward Service Center. Based on B&C’s October 2007 Phase I ESA, the former Montgomery Ward Service Center was reported as the primary area of concern. The results of previous investigations indicated that the former Montgomery Ward Service Center was impacted with TPH-g and BTEX in the vicinity of the former USTs and dispenser island.

According to the Workplan, four soil borings were proposed to further delineate impacts in the vicinity of the former dispenser island, and five additional soil borings were proposed to further delineate impacts in the vicinity of the former UST network. At each location, each soil boring location would be advanced using a hollow stem auger rig up to approximately 100 feet bgs or groundwater, whichever was encountered first. Soil samples would be submitted to an on-site mobile laboratory and analyzed for TPHg by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8015M and VOC analysis by EPA Method 8260B.

One groundwater well (MW-3) installation was proposed to evaluate groundwater gradient and further evaluate potential groundwater impacts at the site. After at least 48 hours following well development, the newly installed well (MW-3) and the two existing wells (MW-1 and MW-2) would be gauged and sampled. Groundwater samples would be submitted to an off-site laboratory and analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M and VOCs by EPA Method 8260B.

The SVE Pilot Test would consist of a one-day pilot study and the installation of soil vapor extraction and vapor monitoring wells to evaluate the applicability and effectiveness of the SVE technology for removing TPH and VOCs from unsaturated soil at the site. The depths and Packet Pg. 870
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 39 locations of the SVE wells would be based on the results of the additional soil investigation, but they would be located within the primary source area so they could be incorporated into the final SVE system design. To monitor vapor response and vapor concentrations, multi-nested vapor monitoring probes would be installed approximately 15, 30, and 45 feet from the nearest SVE well, with probes located within each of the screened intervals.

The Workplan was prepared in response to a July 21, 2009 letter from the San Bernardino County Fire Department, requesting a subsurface investigation be conducted as a result of an unauthorized release from a UST located to the former Montgomery Ward Service Center. This Workplan was subsequently approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department on August 6, 2010; however, this Workplan was not implemented by the September 8, 2010 deadline. Sections 4.1.1). Records indicating the work plan was implemented were not found.

Law/Crandall, Inc. (Law) – April 19, 1995 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Limited Asbestos Survey Update
Law conducted a Phase I ESA and limited asbestos survey of the adjoining property to the east of the site, the former Harris Department Store, located at 300 North E Street. The purpose of their Phase I ESA was to report environmental concerns arising from activities at this property and nearby properties, and the purpose of the limited asbestos Survey update was to locate, sample, and analyze construction materials that may contain asbestos.

Results of the February 1995 Phase I ESA, did not reveal areas of environmental concern with respect to the adjoining Harris Department store.

Results of Law’s March 16, 1995 agency file review revealed that hydrocarbon-impacted soil was encountered at Unocal #6968 located at 187 North F Street, adjoining property located south of the site, during routine UST replacement activities in September 1987. According to Law’s agency review, AAKO Geotechnical Consultants removed the USTs, advanced five borings, collected soil samples, and installed 16 groundwater monitoring wells at the Unocal #6968 property.

Approximately 500 cubic yards of soil were excavated, aerated, and used as backfill material at the Unocal property. Based on Ninyo & Moore’s review of off-site properties/facilities listed in the EDR database report, this adjoining property is not considered an environmental concern to the site (Section 4.1.1).

4.6 Adjoining Property History
Adjoining properties to the north, south, and west were primarily residential from 1885 to 1906, with commercial properties on the eastern adjoining properties, with an increase in commercial properties to the north, south, southwest, and northwest from 1950 to present.

Packet Pg. 871
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 40 5 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
The objective of the site reconnaissance was to obtain information indicating the potential for RECs in connection with the site. Ms. Sonia Cisneros Ortiz conducted the reconnaissance on April 26, 2022. A site plan is provided as Figure 2 and photographic documentation is provided in Appendix A.

5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions
Limiting conditions were encountered during the site reconnaissance. At the time of the site reconnaissance, areas within the Carousel Mall were not accessible due to the vast amount of debris on the floor from the dilapidated state of the vacant mall. Electrical service was not provided to the Carousel mall at the time of the site reconnaissance; therefore, visibility was poor in various areas of the mall. These limiting conditions are considered physical limitations and data gaps.

5.2 General Site Setting
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was occupied by a vacant shopping center, Carousel Mall. According to Mr. Michael Yarbrough, Real Property Manager of the City of San Bernardino, the mall was constructed in 1972. The site was developed with a two-story building (former Montgomery Ward department store at 144 Carousel Mall) located on the west-central portion of the site, a two-story building (former JCPenney department store at 160 Carousel Mall) was located on the north-central portion of the site, and a two-story internal mall with numerous tenant spaces located on the first and second floors of the shopping mall (295 Carousel Mall). A single-story building was observed on the northwestern portion of the site, which was formerly occupied by the Montgomery Ward Service Center (located at 144 Central City Mall). A basement was observed at the former Montgomery Ward Service Center, which underlined the southwestern portion of the building. A single-story building was observed east of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center, which was formerly occupied by the JC Penney/Firestone Service Center (605 and 677 West 4th Street).

The northeastern portion of the site was developed with a concrete three-level parking structure which was constructed in 1972. The site was developed with asphalt-paved roads and parking lots located on the north, south, and west sides of the site.

According to Mr. Yarbrough, utility services to the site were shut off when the Carousel Mall closed in 2017, with the exception of the fire sprinkler system, which was kept on in case of a fire emergency.

Packet Pg. 872
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 41 Cracked and peeling paint was observed on the ceiling of several former tenant spaces inside the Carousel Mall. Damaged ceiling tiles, flooring, and drywall was observed in the Carousel Mall, including the former Montgomery Ward Service Center and the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center. Based on the date of construction of the Carousel Mall (1972), lead-based paint and asbestos may be present in building materials at the site.

A total of eight hydraulically-operated elevators (both passenger and freight elevators) were observed inside the Carousel Mall, which were not operational. The elevator rooms were not accessible during the site reconnaissance. The presence of the hydraulically-operated elevators at the site represent a REC for the site.

An unlabeled 55-gallon steel drum was observed inside a tenant space inside western portion of the Carousel Mall. Leaks or floor staining was not observed in the vicinity of this drum. A second unlabeled 55-gallon drum was observed inside the northeastern portion of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center (144 Central City Mall). Leaks or floor staining was not observed in the vicinity of this 55-gallon drum. The presence of these unlabeled drums is considered a de minimis condition.

Oil-based floor staining was observed in the vicinity of the in-ground hydraulic lifts located inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center (677 West 4th Street), and in the basement of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center (144 Central City Mall). Cracks were not observed in the vicinity of the oil-based floor stains. The presence of oil-based staining on concrete pavement is considered a de minimis condition.

In-ground hydraulic lifts were observed inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center (677 West 4th Street), and at the former Montgomery Ward Service Center (144 Central City Mall). The presence of the hydraulic lifts at the site represents a REC for the site.

A sump was observed inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center (677 West 4th Street).

Leaks or spills were not observed in the vicinity of the sump. The presence of the sump represents a REC for the site.

Dry transformers were observed inside the Carousel Mall; however, they were not operational.

Evidence of leaks or staining was not observed in the vicinity of the transformers. Pole- or padmounted transformers were not observed at the site.

An underground clarifier was observed adjoining the northern side of the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center at 677 West 4th Street, and adjoining the northwestern side of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center at 144 Central City Mall. The presence of clarifiers at the site is considered a REC for the site.

Packet Pg. 873
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 42 The topography at the site is relatively flat, with regional topography sloping gently to the southeast. Surface drainage is expected to flow to nearby storm drains.

5.3 Adjoining Property Observations
Adjoining properties were observed from the site and from publicly accessible vantage points (e.g., streets, sidewalks) during the site reconnaissance. The properties adjacent to the site are as follows and as depicted on Figure 2:
• North: West 4th Street, beyond which is a mixed commercial/retail/residential buildings and the California Theatre (562 West 4th Street). • South: West 2
nd Street, beyond which is a Chevron gasoline station (187 North F Street) and commercial/retail buildings.
• East: North E Street, beyond which are office space and commercial/retail buildings. • Northwest: West 3rd Street, beyond which are mixed commercial and residential properties. • Southwest: North G Street, beyond which are commercial properties, including Shell gasoline station (702 West 2nd Street) and Fairview Ford dealership (292 North G Street).

5.4 Site Observations
Ninyo & Moore evaluated the site for evidence of the following potential environmental concerns:

Table 10 – On-Site Observations
Conditions Observed
or Noted Comments
Hazardous Substances/Petroleum
Products Not observed
Waste Generation/Storage/Disposal Not observed
ASTs Not observed
Potential Evidence of USTs Not observed
Potential PCB-Containing Equipment X
Dry transformers were observed inside the Carousel Mall; however, they were not operational. Evidence of leaks or staining was not observed in the vicinity of the transformers.

Pole- or pad-mounted transformers were not observed at the site.

Chemical/Petroleum Odors Not observed
Concrete Patches/Pads Not observed
Pools of Liquid X
Pooled liquid (potentially water) was observed in the
southeastern portion of the Carousel Mall. Oily water was observed pooled in the basement of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center (144 Central City Mall). The pooled water may have originated from a leaking pipe.

Sewage Discharge Pipes Not observed
Floor Drains/Sumps X
Floor drains were observed in the Carousel Mall. Evidence of leaks or stains was not observed in the vicinity of the floor drains. Several storm drains were observed in the parking lot areas.

Packet Pg. 874
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 43 Table 10 – On-Site Observations
Conditions Observed
or Noted Comments
Elevator X
A total of eight hydraulically-operated elevators (both passenger and freight elevators) were observed inside the Carousel Mall, each of which was not operational. The elevator rooms were not accessible during the site reconnaissance.

Wells X
Investigative wells were observed along the northwestern boundary of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center and along the northern and eastern boundary of the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center.

Drums X
An unlabeled 55-gallon steel drum was observed inside a tenant space inside western portion of the Carousel Mall. Leaks or floor staining was not observed in the vicinity of this drum. A second unlabeled 55-gallon drum was observed inside the northeastern portion of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center (144 Central City Mall). Leaks or floor staining was not observed in the vicinity of this 55-gallon drum. The presence of these unlabeled drums is considered a de minimis condition.

Unidentified Substance Containers X Refer to comment in “Drums” above.

Stained Soil or Pavement X
Oil-based floor staining was observed in the vicinity of the inground hydraulic lifts located inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center (677 West 4th Street), and in the basement of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center (144 Central City Mall). Cracks were not observed in the vicinity of the oil-based floor stains. The presence of oil-based staining on the southern end of the car detailing area is considered a de minimis condition.

Stressed Vegetation Not observed
Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons Not observed
Wastewater Discharges Disposal
Systems X
An underground clarifier was observed adjoining the northern side of the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center at 677 West 4th Street, and an underground clarifier was observed adjoining the northwestern side of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center at 144 Central City Mall.

Septic Systems/Cesspools Not observed
Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Areas Not observed
6 INTERVIEWS
Interviews were conducted by Ninyo & Moore with the objective of obtaining information regarding potential RECs in connection with the site. Interviews with present owners, operators, and/or occupants of the site, as well as other knowledgeable parties as appropriate, is mandated by ASTM E 1527-13. A summary of the interviews conducted is provided in the table below.

Table 11 – Interviews
Representative Summary
Property Owner
To date, Ninyo & Moore has not received a completed owner questionnaire from the property owner. This is considered a data gap. If information from the completed owner questionnaire alters the findings and conclusions of this report, an addendum will be prepared.

Key Site Manager
Michael Yarbrough of the City of San Bernardino was able to provide information about the site during the site reconnaissance. Mr. Yarbrough was not aware of past environmental issues with the site, including USTs, or spills of hazardous waste.

Past Owners Past ownership entities were not made available to Ninyo & Moore during the preparation of this ESA. Therefore, interviews with past site owners were not conducted.

Packet Pg. 875
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 44 7 FINDINGS
Based upon the results of this Phase I ESA, the following findings are provided. • The site consists of 13 APNs (013-418-128, 013-420-125, 013-421-134, -136, and -138, 013- 422-145, 013-423-127 to -129, and -131, 013-429-111, 013-430-120 and -122) located in San Bernardino, California (County of San Bernardino). The associated site addresses include 605 and 677 West 4th Street, 144 Central City Mall, and 144, 160, and 295 Carousel Mall. • At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was occupied by a vacant shopping center, Carousel Mall, which included a two-story building (former Montgomery Ward department store at 144 Carousel Mall) located on the west-central portion of the site, a two-story building (former JCPenney department store at 160 Carousel Mall) located on the north-central portion of the site, and a two-story internal mall with numerous tenant spaces located on the first and second floors of the shopping mall (295 Carousel Mall). A single-story building was observed on the northwestern portion of the site, which was formerly occupied by the Montgomery Ward Service Center (located at 144 Central City Mall), and a single-story building was observed east of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center, which was formerly occupied by the JC Penney/Firestone Service Center (605 and 677 West 4th Street). o Cracked and peeling paint was observed on the ceiling of several former tenant spaces inside the Carousel Mall. Damaged ceiling tiles, flooring, and drywall was observed in the Carousel Mall, including the former Montgomery Ward Service Center and the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center. Based on the date of construction of the Carousel Mall (1972), lead-based paint and asbestos may be present in building materials at the site. o Eight hydraulically-operated elevators (both passenger and freight elevators) were observed inside the Carousel Mall, which were not operational. The elevator rooms were not accessible during the site reconnaissance. The presence of the hydraulically-operated elevators represent a REC for the site.
o An unlabeled 55-gallon steel drum was observed inside a tenant space inside western portion of the Carousel Mall. A second unlabeled 55-gallon drum was observed inside the northeastern portion of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center (144 Central City Mall). Leaks or floor staining was not observed in the vicinity of the 55-gallon drums. The presence of these unlabeled drums is considered a de minimis condition. o Oil-based floor staining was observed in the vicinity of the in-ground hydraulic lifts located inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center, and in the basement of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center. Cracks were not observed in the vicinity of the oilbased floor stains. The presence of oil-based staining on the concrete pavement is considered a de minimis condition.
o In-ground hydraulic lifts were observed inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center and at the former Montgomery Ward Service Center. The presence of the hydraulic lifts at the site represents a REC for the site.
o A sump was observed inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center. No leaks or spills were observed in the vicinity of the sump. The presence of the sump represents a REC for the site.
o Dry transformers were observed inside the Carousel Mall; however, they were not operational. Evidence of leaks or staining was not observed in the vicinity of the transformers. Pole- or pad-mounted transformers were not observed at the site.

Packet Pg. 876
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 45 o Two underground clarifiers were observed adjoining the northern side of the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center and adjoining the northwestern side of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center (two clarifiers total). The presence of clarifiers at the site is considered a REC for the site.
• Based on historical research, the site was developed as industrial, commercial, retail, and residential properties by 1930. Rails spurs were developed in the southeastern portion of the site from 1894 to 1953. Dry-cleaning facilities were developed in the central portion of the site (south of the Montgomery Ward building) and western portion of the site (southwest of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center) from 1950 to 1968. Gasoline service stations were developed in the northern portion of the site (east of the former JC Penney Service Station) in 1938 (demolished by 1949) and from 1938 to 1966, in the western portion of the site (west of Montgomery Ward building from 1938 to 1953, southwest of the Montgomery Ward building from 1938 to 1968), and on the western edge of the site (intersection of West 3 rd Street and North G Street) from 1938 to 1968. Paint spray booths, associated with auto repair facilities, were developed in the central portion of the site (south of the Carousel Mall) and in the northeastern portion of the site (western portion of the parking structure) from 1950 to 1959. In addition, two body works and paint spraying facilities were developed in the western portion of the site (west of the former Montgomery Ward building) from 1950 to 1968.

A plating facility was developed in the western portion of the site (west of the Montgomery Ward building) from 1950 to 1968. The site was developed with the current Carousel Mall and associated structures by 1972. The presence of former rail spurs, dry-cleaning facilities, gasoline service stations, paint spray booths, and auto body/paint spraying facilities are considered RECs.
• The site addresses of 144 Central City Mall (former Montgomery Ward Service Center) and 677 West 4th Street (former JC Penney Service Center) were listed on several environmental databases, including RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO, LUST, Hist UST, Cortese, CERS, HWTS, SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, and EMI.
o Former Montgomery Ward Service Center: This site listing operated as an automotive service center from 1972 until the mid-1980s, and included three 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs, one 550-gallon waste oil UST, dispensers, clarifier, and underground hydraulic lifts.

The USTs were removed in the mid-1980s. Site assessments were conducted starting in 2007, which encountered elevated petroleum hydrocarbons in soil, soil vapor, and groundwater. In 2021, an assessment was conducted to evaluate the lateral extent of TPH-g impacted soil in the vicinity of the clarifier and former waste oil tank. The assessment encountered elevated TPH-g, benzene, ethylbenzene, and naphthalene in soil. Based on the on-going assessment activities and open case with the RWQCB, this site listing is considered a REC.
o Former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center: Four USTs (three gasoline and one waste oil) were removed from the site in 1985 and 1986. Site assessments were conducted from 2002 to 2004 to delineate the extent of petroleum hydrocarbon impacts in soil.

Remediation activities at the site included a soil vapor extraction system, which operated from 2005 to 2006. The site received case closure in 2008. This closed LUST case is considered a HREC. Underground hydraulic lifts and a clarifier were not part of the case closure, and records indicating subsurface evaluations for these features were not found.

Therefore, the underground hydraulic lifts and clarifier are considered RECs. • Several facilities within the site vicinity were listed on several environmental databases.

Based on the information provided, adjoining properties were not concerned an environmental concern to the site.

Packet Pg. 877
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 46 8 OPINIONS
The rationale for concluding whether or not the conditions listed in Section 8, above, do not represent RECs, HRECs, or CRECs (i.e., the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions indicative of releases, past releases, or a material threat of a release of hazardous substances, pollutants, contaminants, and/or petroleum/petroleum products at the site) is provided below.

8.1 RECs
Underground clarifiers and underground hydraulic lifts were observed at the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center and former Montgomery Ward Service Center. Based on available records, the current clarifier and hydraulic lifts at the former JC Penney Service Center were not evaluated as part of the LUST case closure in 2008. Site assessment/remediation activities concerning the clarifier and hydraulic lifts at the former Montgomery Ward Service Center are ongoing as part of the open LUST case. Due to the propensity for clarifiers and underground hydraulic lifts to release petroleum hydrocarbons and/or polychlorinated biphenyls to the subsurface, the presence of clarifiers and underground hydraulic lifts at the site are considered RECs.

The Former Montgomery Ward Service Center operated as an automotive service center from 1972 until the mid-1980s, and included three 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs, one 550-gallon waste oil UST, dispensers, clarifier, and underground hydraulic lifts. The USTs were removed in the mid1980s. Site assessments were conducted starting in 2007, which encountered elevated petroleum hydrocarbons in soil, soil vapor, and groundwater. In 2021, an assessment was conducted to evaluate the lateral extent of TPH-g impacted soil in the vicinity of the clarifier and former waste oil tank. The assessment encountered elevated TPH-g, benzene, ethylbenzene, and naphthalene in soil. Based on the on-going assessment activities and open case with the RWQCB, this site listing is considered a REC.

Dry-cleaning facilities were developed in the central portion of the site (south of the Montgomery Ward building) and western portion of the site (southwest of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center) from 1950 to 1968. Due to the propensity for dry-cleaning facilities to use and release tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and other VOCs to the subsurface, the former presence of dry-cleaning facilities on the site is considered a REC.

Gasoline service stations were developed in the northern portion of the site (east of the former JC Penney Service Station) in 1938 (demolished by 1949) and from 1938 to 1966, in the western portion of the site (west of Montgomery Ward building from 1938 to 1953, southwest of the Montgomery Ward building from 1938 to 1968), and on the western edge of the site (intersection Packet Pg. 878
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 47 of West 3
rd Street and North G Street) from 1938 to 1968. Due to the propensity for gasoline service stations to release petroleum hydrocarbons from USTs to the subsurface, lack of documentation concerning UST removal at the properties, and lack of environmental oversight during the period these gasoline service stations operated, the presence of former gasoline service stations on the site is considered a REC.

Paint spray booths, associated with auto repair facilities, were developed in the central portion of the site (south of the Carousel Mall) and in the northeastern portion of the site (western portion of the parking structure) from 1950 to 1959. In addition, two body works and paint spraying facilities were developed in the western portion of the site (west of the former Montgomery Ward building) from 1950 to 1968. Due to the propensity for paint spray booths to release VOCs to the subsurface and lack of environmental oversight during the period these paint spray booths operated, the presence of former paint spray booths on the site is considered a REC.

A plating facility was developed in the western portion of the site (west of the Montgomery Ward building) from 1950 to 1968. Due to the propensity for plating facilities to release metals, VOCs, and other petroleum hydrocarbons to the subsurface and lack of environmental oversight during the period this plating facility operated, the presence of a former plating facility on the site is considered a REC.

According to historical research, railroad spurs were developed in the southeastern portion of the site from 1894 to 1953. Equipment and materials often historically used in association with railroads, such as lead, ballast materials containing steel slag with potential regulated heavy metal concentrations, total petroleum hydrocarbon fuel leaks, PCB leaks, and railroad lubricators utilizing petroleum products, may have been used within the site. In addition, herbicides were often historically applied on railroad ROWs to prevent the growth of vegetation between railroad tracks. The potential presence of residual chemicals from railroad ROWs on the site is considered a REC.

Eight hydraulically-operated elevators (both passenger and freight elevators) were observed inside the Carousel Mall, which were not operational. The elevator rooms were not accessible during the site reconnaissance. The presence of the hydraulically-operated elevators represent a REC for the site.

A sump was observed inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center. No leaks or spills were observed in the vicinity of the sump. The presence of the sump represents a REC for the site.

Packet Pg. 879
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 48

8.2 CRECs
CRECs were not encountered during the preparation of this report.

8.3 HRECs
On March 20, 2008, the RWQCB confirmed completion of the site investigation and remedial activities and granted No Further Action (NFA) related to the USTs at the former JC Penney Service station at 605 and 677 West 4th Street. Monitoring wells and vapor extraction wells were abandoned in accordance with the San Bernardino County requirements, and the former remediation system infrastructure was removed. The closed LUST case at the former JC Penney Service Center is considered a HREC with respect to the former USTs.

8.4 De Minimis Conditions
An unlabeled 55-gallon steel drum was observed inside a tenant space inside western portion of the Carousel Mall. A second unlabeled 55-gallon drum was observed inside the northeastern portion of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center (144 Central City Mall). Leaks or floor staining was not observed in the vicinity of the 55-gallon drums. The presence of unlabeled drums is considered a de minimis condition.

Oil-based floor staining was observed in the vicinity of the in-ground hydraulic lifts located inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Service Center, and in the basement of the former Montgomery Ward Service Center. Cracks were not observed in the vicinity of the oil-based floor stains. The presence of oil-based staining on the concrete pavement is considered a de minimis condition.

8.5 Data Gaps
To date, the completed user and owner questionnaires have not been filled out and returned to Ninyo & Moore. These are considered data gaps. If information from the user, or the owner alters the conclusions of this report, an addendum will be prepared. 9 CONCLUSIONS
We have performed a Phase I ESA, in conformance with the scope and limitations of the ASTM Practice E 1527-13, for the Carousel Mall property located in San Bernardino, California. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.4 and in the body of this report. This assessment has not revealed RECs in connection with the site, except for the following:
• The current open LUST case for the former Montgomery Ward Service Center is considered a REC.

Packet Pg. 880
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 49 • The closed LUST case for the former JC Penney Service Center is considered an HREC with respect to the former USTs.
• The presence of clarifiers and underground hydraulic lifts at the former Montgomery Ward Service Center and the former JC Penney Service Center are considered RECs. • The presence of two former dry-cleaning facilities at the site is considered a REC. • The presence of five former gasoline service stations at the site is considered a REC. • The presence of three former paint spray booths on the site is considered a REC. • The presence of a former plating facility on the site is considered a REC. • This historical presence of former railroad spurs in the southeastern portion of the site is considered a REC.
• The presence of eight hydraulically-operated elevators at the site is considered a REC. • The presence of the sump at the site is considered a REC.

Packet Pg. 881
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 50 10 REFERENCES
ASTM International, 2013, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, Designation E-1527-13.

Brown and Caldwell, 2007a, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Carousel Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California, 92401, dated October 30.

Brown and Caldwell, 2007b, Preliminary Draft Data Summary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Carousel Mall Shopping Center, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California, dated November 16.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 2022, EnviroStor website (https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/), accessed in May.

California State Water Resources Control Board, 2022, GeoTracker website (https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/), accessed in May.

DTSC, see California Department of Toxic Substances Control.

EDR, see Environmental Data Resources, Inc.

Environmental Data Resources Inc., 2022, Certified Sanborn Map Report, Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA 92401: dated April 18.

Environmental Data Resources Inc., 2022, EDR Historical Topo Map Report, Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA 92401: dated April 18.

Environmental Data Resources Inc., 2022, The EDR Aerial Photograph Decade Package, Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA 92401: dated April 18.

Environmental Data Resources Inc., 2022, The EDR-City Directory Abstract, Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA 92401: dated April 19.

Environmental Data Resources Inc., 2022, The EDR Summary Radius MapTM Report with GeoCheck®, Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA 92401: dated April 18.

Gannett Fleming, Inc., 2010, Supplemental Site Assessment and SVE Pilot Test Work Plan, Carousel Mall, 295 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California: dated February 10.

Law/Crandall, Inc., 1995, Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Limited Asbestos Survey Update, Harris’ Department Store, 300 North “E” Street, San Bernardino, California: dated April 19.

Ninyo & Moore, 2018, Supplemental Site Assessment and Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Test Work Plan, Former Montgomery Ward Service Center, 144 Central City Mall, San Bernardino, California: date December 11.

Ninyo & Moore, 2020a, Revised Supplemental Site Assessment and Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Study Report, Former Montgomery Ward Service Center, 144 Central City Mall, San Bernardino, California: date August 11.

Ninyo & Moore, 2020b, Conceptual Site Model and Additional Assessment Work Plan, Former Montgomery Ward Service Center, 144 Central City Mall, San Bernardino, California: date August 7.

Ninyo & Moore, 2021, Additional Site Assessment Report, Former Montgomery Ward Service Center, 144 Central City Mall, San Bernardino, California: date November 4.

SCAQMD, see South Coast Air Quality Management District.

South Coast Air Quality District Facility Information Detail (FIND) Database, 2022, http://www3.aqmd.gov/webappl/fim/prog/search.aspx, accessed in May.

Packet Pg. 882
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 51 State of California, Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources, 2022, Well Finder website, http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/Pages/Wellfinder.aspx, accessed in May.

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), 2022, GeoTracker webpage http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/, accessed in May.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory, 2022, Wetlands Mapper website (https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html) accessed in May.

United State Geological Survey, 2018, San Bernardino South and North Quadrangles, California

7.5 Minute Series.

Packet Pg. 883
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022 52 11 PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT
As required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §312.21(d) and Section 12.13 of ASTM 1527-13, the following statement is included:

I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined by §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.

John Jay Roberts, PG, CEG
Principal Geologist
12 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL
Resumes, which document the professional qualifications, pursuant to 40 CFR §312.10(b)(2), of the persons that prepared and reviewed this report are provided as Appendix F.

Packet Pg. 884
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022

FIGURES
Packet Pg. 885
SITE
Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants
211809001_SL.dwg 11/04/2021 JDP

SITE LOCATION
FIGURE 1
NOTE: DIMENSIONS, DIRECTIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. I REFERENCE: USGS, 2021. 0 FEET 2,000 4,000

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 I 5/22
N
Packet Pg. 886
Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants

SITE PLAN
NOTE: DIMENSIONS, DIRECTIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. I REFERENCE: GOOGLE EARTH, 2022. 0 FEET 350 700
LEGEND

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 I 5/22
FIGURE 2

N SITE BOUNDARY

ELEVATOR

CLARIFIER
SUMP

HYDRAULIC LIFTS
702 ADDRESS NUMBER
211871001_FIGURES.DWG 5/18/22 AOB 395 451
708
144
FORMER

MONTGOMERY WARD

SERVICE CENTER
FORMER

FIRESTONE/

JC PENNEY

SERVICE CENTER
696
677 WEST 4TH STREET
604 562 450570 396 379 361
WEST COURT STREET 320 NORTH E STREET 300 245 201 NORTH D STREET 555 187
699 655 601 701
702
707
WEST 2ND STREET

NORTH G STREET
292

FAIRVIEW
FORD
WEST 3RD STREET
322

MULTI-LEVEL

PARKING

STRUCTURE
FORMER

JC PENNEY

DEPARTMENT
STORE
FORMER

MONTGOMERY
WARD

CAROUSEL MALL NORTH F STREET
DENTAL

PRACTICE

AMERICAS

BEST INN

RESIDENCES COMMERCIAL/RETAIL CA

THEATRE
OF

PERFORMING
ARTS

REGAL MOVIE THEATER

THE ENTERPRISE

BUILDING

GUATEMALAN

CONSULATE
BIG 5

SPORTING
GOODS

CITY OF
SAN

BERNARDINO

CHEVRON

STARBUCKS T SHIRTS
MART
McDONALD'S
SHELL
I-215

FORMER GASOLINE SERVICE STATION

FORMER DRY CLEANING FACILITY

FORMER PAINT SPRAY BOOTH

FORMER RAILROAD TRACKS
703
696 736 1/2 798
327,335
376,378,
& 398 576
655
268

FORMER PLATING FACILITY
321 & 325 N. G STREET
363
Packet Pg. 887
MW-1
SV-13 SV-12 SV-11
SV-10 SV-9 SV-7
SV-4 SV-1
SV-2
SV-5
SV-3
SV-6
SB-13
SB-15 SB-17 SB-14
SB-16
SB-1
SB-7 SB-8 SB-3
SB-4
SB-2
SB-6
SB-5
SB-1
SB-12SB-11
CB-4
CB-3
CB-1 CB-2
HSA-2
(BASEMENT)
HSA-1
SB-22
(BASEMENT)
SB-9
MIP-2
CPT-1
MIP-1
CB-5
MW-2
SB-21
(BASEMENT)
WEST 3RD STREET
SB-23/ SVE-1
SB-27/ SVE-2 SB-28
SB-25
SB-24
SB-26

WASTE OIL TANK

HYDRAULIC LIFT
SB-1

EXISTING CLARIFIER
SB-31 SB-32
SB-29 SB-30
SB-34A
SB-34
SB-33 SB-36

FORMER LOCATION OF DISPENSING ISLAND
FORMER LOCATION OF USTs
SB-10

HYDRAULIC LIFTS HYDRAULIC LIFTS
ESB-14/VEW-3
ESB-15/MW-2
MW-1 ESB-8b/VEW-1
ESB-11/VEW-2
ESB-8
ESB-7 ESB-10
ESB-12
ESB-13
ESB-6 ESB-1 ESB-4
ESB-3
ESB-2 ESB-5
SB-6 SB-5
SB-1
SB-7
SB-2
SB-3*
SB-4* REPORTED LOCATION OF
FORMER GASOLINE USTs

OIL-WATER

SEPARATOR

FORMER GASOLINE DISPENSING AREA

HYDRAULIC
LIFTS

LOCATION OF HYDRAULIC
LIFTS

LOCATION OF HYDRAULIC
LIFTS
Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants

SITE PLAN, FORMER MONTGOMERY WARD AND

FIRESTONE/JC PENNEY SERVICE CENTERS
NOTE: DIMENSIONS, DIRECTIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. I REFERENCE: GOOGLE EARTH, 2022. 0 FEET 50 100

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 I 5/22
FIGURE 3
N 211871001_FIGURES.DWG 5/25/22 AOB

LEGEND FOR FORMER MONTGOMERY WARD SERVICE CENTER
SOIL VAPOR BORING LOCATION (BROWN AND CALDWELL, 2007)
SOIL BORING LOCATION (BROWN AND CALDWELL, 2007):

CB COLLECTED BY CONE PENETROMETER TEST RIG (CPT)

HSA COLLECTED BY HOLLOW STEM AUGER

COLLECTED BY GEOPROBE
CPT PROFILE (BROWN AND CALDWELL, 2007)
SB
MEMBRANE INTERFACE PROBE (BROWN AND CALDWELL, 2007)
SB-1
SV-6
CPT-1
MIP-1
MW-1
SB-26 SOIL BORING CONVERTED TO SOIL VAPOR PROBE (NINYO AND MOORE, 2019) SB-27/SVE-2 SOIL BORING CONVERTED TO VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL (NINYO AND MOORE, 2019) SB-28 SOIL BORING (NINYO AND MOORE, 2019)
SB-29 SOIL BORING (NINYO AND MOORE, 2021)
SB-30 SOIL BORING CONVERTED TO SOIL VAPOR PROBE
(NINYO AND MOORE, 2021)
SB-33 SOIL BORING CONVERTED TO VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL
(NINYO AND MOORE, 2019) LOCATION OF GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS (BROWN AND CALDWELL, 2007)

LEGEND FOR FORMER FIRESTONE/JC PENNEY SERVICE CENTER
ESB-15/MW-2 SOIL BORING/WELL INSTALLED IN SEPTEMBER 2007 BY ENTRIX, INC.

MW-1
ESB-8b/VEW-1
ESB-7
ESB-13
SB-7
MONITORING WELL INSTALLED IN FEBRUARY 2004 BY ENTRIX, INC.

VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL INSTALLED IN FEBRUARY 2004 BY ENTRIX, INC.

SOIL BORING INSTALLED IN AUGUST 2004 BY ENTRIX, INC.

SOIL BORING INSTALLED IN JULY 2003 BY ENTRIX, INC.

SOIL BORING INSTALLED IN JULY 2002 BY CALVADA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC.

WEST 4TH STREET

FORMER FIRESTONE/

JC PENNEY SERVICE CENTER
FORMER

MONTGOMERY WARD

SERVICE CENTER
Packet Pg. 888
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022

APPENDIX A
Photographs
Packet Pg. 889

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-1
Photograph 1: Looking north with view of the south-central parking lot, beyond which is the Carousel Mall.

Photograph 2: Looking north with view of the loading docks located on the southwestern portion of the Carousel Mall (former Montgomery Ward department store).

Packet Pg. 890

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-2
Photograph 3: Looking south with view of the northwestern portion of the site (former Montgomery Ward department store).

Photograph 4: Looking south with view of the loading docks located at the former JC Penney department store on the north-central portion of the site.

Packet Pg. 891

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-3
Photograph 5: Looking east with view of western entrance to the three-level parking structure located on the northeastern portion of the site.

Photograph 6: Looking southwest with view of the eastern entrance to the Carousel Mall multi-level parking structure.

Packet Pg. 892

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-4
Photograph 7: Representative view of the multi-level parking structure located on the northeastern portion of the site.

Photograph 8: Looking north with view of rooftop parking garage located on the northeastern portion of the Carousel Mall.

Packet Pg. 893

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-5
Photograph 9: Looking east with view of a typical freight elevator located on the southern portion of the Carousel Mall.

Photograph 10: Looking north with view of a typical corridor inside the Carousel Mall.

Packet Pg. 894

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-6
Photograph 11: View of pooled liquid (potentially water) next to a delivery door located on the southeastern portion of the Carousel Mall.

Photograph 12: Looking east with an inside view of the eastern portion of the Carousel Mall.

Packet Pg. 895

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-7
Photograph 13: Inside view of typical tenant space located on the southeastern portion of the Carousel Mall.

Photograph 14: View of electrical panels and dry transformer located inside the northern portion of the Carousel Mall.

Packet Pg. 896

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-8
Photograph 15: View of escalators located in the central portion of the Carousel Mall.

Photograph 16: View of a 55-gallon drum with unidentified contents inside a former tenant space located on the western portion of the Carousel Mall.

Packet Pg. 897

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-9
Photograph 17: View of a former tenant space located on the second floor, inside the Carousel Mall.

Photograph 18: Looking east with view of the northern portion of the former JC Penney/Firestone Store at 677 West 4th Street.

Packet Pg. 898

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-10
Photograph 19: Looking east with view of the southern portion of the former JC Penney/Firestone Store at 677 West 4th Street.

Photograph 20: View of clarifier located adjoining the northern side of the former JC Penney/Firestone Store at 677 West 4th Street.

Packet Pg. 899

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-11
Photograph 21: Looking south with view of the inside of the eastern portion of the former JC Penney/Firestone Store at 677 West 4th Street.

Photograph 22: View of in-ground hydraulic lifts located inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Store at 677 West 4th Street.

Packet Pg. 900

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-12
Photograph 23: View of sump located inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Store at 677 West 4th Street.

Photograph 24: View of oil-based floor staining in the vicinity of the in-ground hydraulic lifts inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Store at 677 West 4th Street.

Packet Pg. 901

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-13
Photograph 25: View of floor drain inside the former JC Penney/Firestone Store at 677 West 4th Street.

Photograph 26: Looking northwestern with view of the southeastern boundary of the former Montgomery Wards Service Center at 144 Central City Mall.

Packet Pg. 902

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-14
Photograph 27: Looking northeast with view of clarifier located adjoining the northwestern side of the former Montgomery Wards Service Center at 144 Central City Mall.

Photograph 28: Looking northeast with view of the southwestern portion of the former Montgomery Wards Service Center at 144 Central City Mall.

Packet Pg. 903

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-15
Photograph 29: Looking northeast with view of the southeastern portion of the former Montgomery Wards Service Center at 144 Central City Mall.

Photograph 30: View of in-ground hydraulic lift inside former Montgomery Wards Service Center at 144 Central City Mall.

Packet Pg. 904

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-16
Photograph 31: View of 55-gallon drum containing unidentified contents located on the northeastern portion of the former Montgomery Wards Service Center at 144 Central City Mall.

Photograph 32: View of oil-based floor staining in the basement in the vicinity of the hydraulic lift system.

Packet Pg. 905

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-17
Photograph 33: Looking northwest with view of oily water on the floor of the basement of the former Montgomery Wards Service Center at 144 Central City Mall.

Photograph 34: Looking northeast away from the site with view of adjoining property to the northeast.

Packet Pg. 906

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-18
Photograph 35: Looking northwest with view of northern parking lot, beyond which is adjoining property to the north of the site.

Photograph 36: Looking northwest away from the site with view of W. 4th Street, beyond which is the adjoining property to the northwest.

Packet Pg. 907

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-19
Photograph 37: Looking southwest away from the site with view of adjoining property (Fairview Ford at 292 North G Street).

Photograph 38: Looking west away from the site with view of North G Street, followed by adjoining property (702 North G Street).

Packet Pg. 908

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-20
Photograph 39: Looking southeast away from the site with view of West 2nd Street and North F Street intersection, followed by adjoining property.

Photograph 40: Looking northeast with view of adjoining former Harris Department store to the east of the site.

Packet Pg. 909

PHOTOGRAPHS

CAROUSEL MALL

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
211871001 | 5/22
FIGURE A-21
Photograph 41: Looking southeast away from the site with view of North E Street, followed by adjoining property to the southeast.

Photograph 42: Looking northeast away from the site with view of North E Street, followed by adjoining property to the northeast.

Packet Pg. 910
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022

APPENDIX B
User and Property Owner Provided Information
Packet Pg. 911
 
  
 Packet Pg. 912
 
  
 Packet Pg. 913
 
  
 Packet Pg. 914
 
  
 Packet Pg. 915
 
  
 Packet Pg. 916
 
  
 Packet Pg. 917
 
  
 Packet Pg. 918
 
  
 Packet Pg. 919
 
  
 Packet Pg. 920
 
  
 Packet Pg. 921
 
  
 Packet Pg. 922
 
  
 Packet Pg. 923
 
  
 Packet Pg. 924
 
  
 Packet Pg. 925
 
  
 Packet Pg. 926
 
  
 Packet Pg. 927
 
  
 Packet Pg. 928
 
  
 Packet Pg. 929
 
  
 Packet Pg. 930
 
  
 Packet Pg. 931
 
  
 Packet Pg. 932
 
  
 Packet Pg. 933
 
  
 Packet Pg. 934
 
  
 Packet Pg. 935
 
  
 Packet Pg. 936
 
  
 Packet Pg. 937
 
  
 Packet Pg. 938
 
  
 Packet Pg. 939
 
  
 Packet Pg. 940
 
  
 Packet Pg. 941
 
  
 Packet Pg. 942
 
  
 Packet Pg. 943
 
  
 Packet Pg. 944
 
  
 Packet Pg. 945
 
  
 Packet Pg. 946
 
  
 Packet Pg. 947
 
  
 Packet Pg. 948
 
  
 Packet Pg. 949
 
  
 Packet Pg. 950
 
  
 Packet Pg. 951
 
  
 Packet Pg. 952
 
  
 Packet Pg. 953
 
  
 Packet Pg. 954
 
  
 Packet Pg. 955
 
  
 Packet Pg. 956
 
  
 Packet Pg. 957
 
  
 Packet Pg. 958
 
  
 Packet Pg. 959
 
  
 Packet Pg. 960
 
  
 Packet Pg. 961
 
  
 Packet Pg. 962
 
  
 Packet Pg. 963
 
  
 Packet Pg. 964
 
  
 Packet Pg. 965
 
  
 Packet Pg. 966
 
  
 Packet Pg. 967
 
  
 Packet Pg. 968
 
  
 Packet Pg. 969
 
  
 Packet Pg. 970
 
  
 Packet Pg. 971
 
  
 Packet Pg. 972
 
  
 Packet Pg. 973
 
  
 Packet Pg. 974
 
  
 Packet Pg. 975
 
  
 Packet Pg. 976
 
  
 Packet Pg. 977
 
  
 Packet Pg. 978
 
  
 Packet Pg. 979
 
  
 Packet Pg. 980
 
  
 Packet Pg. 981
 
  
 Packet Pg. 982
 
  
 Packet Pg. 983
 
  
 Packet Pg. 984
 
  
 Packet Pg. 985
 
  
 Packet Pg. 986
 
  
 Packet Pg. 987
 
  
 Packet Pg. 988
 
  
 Packet Pg. 989
 
  
 Packet Pg. 990
 
  
 Packet Pg. 991
 
  
 Packet Pg. 992
 
  
 Packet Pg. 993
 
  
 Packet Pg. 994
 
  
 Packet Pg. 995
 
  
 Packet Pg. 996
 
  
 Packet Pg. 997
 
  
 Packet Pg. 998
 
  
 Packet Pg. 999
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1000
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1001
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1002
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1003
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1004
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1005
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1006
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1007
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1008
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1009
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1010
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1011
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1012
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1013
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1014
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1015
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1016
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1017
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1018
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1019
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1020
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1021
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1022
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1023
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1024
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1025
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1026
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1027
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1028
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1029
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1030
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1031
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1032
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1033
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1034
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1035
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1036
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1037
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1038
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1039
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1040
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1041
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1042
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1043
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1044
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1045
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1046
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1047
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1048
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1049
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1050
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1051
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1052
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1053
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1054
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1055
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1056
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1057
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1058
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1059
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1060
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1061
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1062
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1063
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1064
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1065
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1066
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1067
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1068
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1069
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1070
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1071
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1072
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1073
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1074
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1075
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1076
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1077
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1078
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1079
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1080
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1081
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1082
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1083
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1084
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1085
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1086
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1087
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1088
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1089
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1090
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1091
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1092
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1093
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1094
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1095
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1096
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1097
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1098
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1099
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1100
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1101
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1102
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1103
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1104
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1105
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1106
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1107
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1108
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1109
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1110
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1111
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1112
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1113
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1114
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1115
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1116
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1117
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1118
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1119
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1120
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1121
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1122
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1123
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1124
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1125
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1126
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1127
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1128
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1129
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1130
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1131
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1132
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1133
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1134
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1135
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1136
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1137
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1138
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1139
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1140
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1141
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1142
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1143
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1144
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1145
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1146
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1147
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1148
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1149
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1150
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1151
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1152
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1153
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1154
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1155
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1156
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1157
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1158
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1159
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1160
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1161
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1162
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1163
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1164
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1165
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1166
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1167
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1168
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1169
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1170
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1171
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1172
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1173
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1174
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1175
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1176
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1177
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1178
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1179
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1180
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1181
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1182
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1183
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1184
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1185
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1186
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1187
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1188
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1189
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1190
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1191
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1192
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1193
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1194
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1195
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1196
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1197
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1198
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1199
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1200
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1201
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1202
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1203
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1204
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1205
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1206
 
  
 Packet Pg. 1207
Ninyo & Moore | Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, California | 211871001 | May 25, 2022

APPENDIX C
Environmental Database Report
Packet Pg. 1208

FORM-LBC-ASH
The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck®
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Carousel Mall

CAROUSEL MALL
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Inquiry Number: 6944754.2s
April 18, 2022
Packet Pg. 1209

SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 9
Orphan Summary 803
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1

GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-6
Physical Setting Source Map A-11
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC6944754.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,

ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Packet Pg. 1210

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).

The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS

CAROUSEL MALL
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401

COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 34.1046940 - 34ˆ 6’ 16.89’’
Longitude (West): 117.2969180 - 117ˆ 17’ 48.90’’
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 11
UTM X (Meters): 472613.3
UTM Y (Meters): 3773609.2
Elevation: 1053 ft. above sea level

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 12016021 SAN BERNARDINO SOUTH, CA
Version Date: 2018

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140603
Source: USDA
Packet Pg. 1211
6944754.2s Page 2
K38 DRAPER GARAGE 264 E NORTH EDR Hist Auto Lower 140, 0.027, ESE K37 ONE DAY PAINT & BODY 288 E ST CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 133, 0.025, East J36 SUDDEN 1-HOUR PHOTO 667 W 2ND ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit Lower 133, 0.025, SSW J35 RICKER C H REFRIG 665 2ND ST EDR Hist Auto Lower 133, 0.025, SSW J34 FAMILY DRY CLEANERS 663 W 2ND ST CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA DRYCLEANERS, CA HAZNET, CA...Lower 133, 0.025, SSW J33 FAMILY CLEANERS 663 W SECOND ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO, CA DRYCLEANERS, CA San... Lower 133, 0.025, SSW J32 FAMILY DRY CLEANERS 663 W 2ND ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 133, 0.025, SSW J31 VAN DEVENTER C B 663 2ND ST EDR Hist Auto Lower 133, 0.025, SSW J30 FAMILY CLEANERS 663 W 2ND ST EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 133, 0.025, SSW H29 JOHN M POWELL O.D. 222 N G ST STE 1 CA San Bern. Co. Permit Higher 129, 0.024, SW I28 HOLDRIDGE J R DO CLN 509 4TH EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 126, 0.024, ENE G27 A B C CLNRS 537 4TH ST EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 118, 0.022, NE G26 MALOOF WM AUTOS 547 4TH ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 115, 0.022, NE C25 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS 245 N E ST CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA HAZNET, CA San Bern. Co.... Lower 112, 0.021, ESE C24 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS 245 N E ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 112, 0.021, ESE F23 CONCORDE CAREER INST 570 W 4TH ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit Higher 110, 0.021, NNE A22 KIMBALL F A DO CNR 680 4TH EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 100, 0.019, NNW D21 ROBINSON E A GAS 597 2ND ST EDR Hist Auto Lower 99, 0.019, SSE H20 ARCO #6227 702 CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 92, 0.017, SW G19 SPENCE HARVEY DO 556 4TH ST EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 87, 0.016, NE F18 JORDAN BRUCE AUTOS 598 4TH ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 85, 0.016, NNE C17 ROSE JOS GAS STA 200 E EDR Hist Auto Lower 60, 0.011, SE A16 STUMP CHESTER AUTO R 701 3RD EDR Hist Auto Higher 56, 0.011, NW A15 BUSTER E D AUTO 701 3RD ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 56, 0.011, NW A14 KARR D F DO CLNR 703 3RD ST EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 54, 0.010, NW A13 S B MOTOR CAR CO 713 3RD EDR Hist Auto Higher 40, 0.008, NW C12 DRAPER GARAGE 242 E EDR Hist Auto Lower 37, 0.007, ESE F11 BROWN H F AUTOS 571 4TH ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 27, 0.005, NNE E10 SHERREL H C GAS STA 599 4TH ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 26, 0.005, North D9 ONE HOUR PHOTOLAND 256 CAROUSEL MALL B CA San Bern. Co. Permit Lower 26, 0.005, SSE D8 INMAN BROS AUTO 564 2ND ST EDR Hist Auto Lower 9, 0.002, SSE C7 DREBLOW A H AUTO REP 228 E NORTH EDR Hist Auto Lower 1 ft.

B6 MONTGOMERY WARD 144 CENTRAL CITY MAL CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, CA EMI, CA HWTS Higher 1 ft.

A5 FIRESTONE STORE (BFS 677 W. 4TH ST CA LUST, CA Cortese Higher 1 ft. 4 SAN BERNARDINO 144 CENTRAL CITY MAL CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Higher 1 ft.

B3 AUTO EXPRESS 2200 144 CENTRAL CITY MAL RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1 ft.

A2 FIRESTONE STORES 677 W 4TH ST CA LUST, CA SWEEPS UST, CA HIST UST, CA CERS Higher 1 ft.

A1 FIRESTONE STORES 677 W 4 TH ST CA FID UST Higher 1 ft.

Reg NEWMARK GROUND WATER BUNKER HILL GROUND W NPL, SEMS, US ENG CONTROLS, US INST CONTROLS, ROD,...Same 4095, 0.776, NNW

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:

CAROUSEL MALL
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS Packet Pg. 1212
6944754.2s Page 3
I77 ST CALIFORNIA DEPT O 464 W 4TH ST CA UST Lower 310, 0.059, ENE I76 ST-CONSOLID.OFFICES 464 W 4TH ST CA UST Lower 310, 0.059, ENE O75 BEST CLEANERS,ANDREW 624 W 4TH ST CA DRYCLEANERS Higher 306, 0.058, North O74 BEST CLEANERS 624 W 4TH ST CA DRYCLEANERS Higher 306, 0.058, North O73 BEST CLEANERS 624 W 4TH ST STE D EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 306, 0.058, North O72 BEST CLEANERS 624 W 4TH ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 306, 0.058, North O71 BEST CLEANERS 624 4TH ST CA DRYCLEANERS Higher 306, 0.058, North K70 MARUKO HOTEL 295 N E ST CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 295, 0.056, East N69 ABANDONED UST (FAIRV 808 W 3RD ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit Higher 225, 0.043, West N68 DEL GEORGE SERVICE 808 3RD ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 225, 0.043, West N67 REDDIG F E AUTO REPR 316 H EDR Hist Auto Higher 222, 0.042, WNW N66 COBB F H SERV STA 318 H EDR Hist Auto Higher 222, 0.042, WNW L65 AEROBACK MEDICAL GRO 740 W 4TH ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 207, 0.039, NW M64 N W COR GATEWAY SERV 195 E NORTH EDR Hist Auto Lower 198, 0.038, SE K63 MARCUS WM 274 E EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 195, 0.037, East D62 UNION OIL SERVICE ST 187 N F ST CA LUST, CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA HIST UST, CA CERS... Lower 184, 0.035, SSE D61 UNION OIL SERVICE ST 187 N F ST CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 184, 0.035, SSE D60 G&M OIL CO. 187 N F ST CA UST Lower 184, 0.035, SSE D59 G AND M OIL COMPANY 187 NORTH F STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 184, 0.035, SSE D58 UNION OIL SERVICE ST 187 NORTH F STREET CA HIST UST Lower 184, 0.035, SSE D57 UNICAL 76 187 N F ST EDR Hist Auto Lower 184, 0.035, SSE D56 G & M OIL CO INC #67 187 N F ST CA UST Lower 184, 0.035, SSE H55 PRESTIGE STATIONS IN 702 W 2ND ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 179, 0.034, SW H54 DAMAS CAPITAL INVEST 702 W 2ND ST CA UST Higher 179, 0.034, SW H53 PRESTIGE STATIONS IN 702 W 2ND ST CA HIST UST, RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO, CA... Higher 179, 0.034, SW H52 ARCO PETROLEUM PROD 702 W 2ND ST CA UST Higher 179, 0.034, SW H51 DAMAS CAPITAL INVEST 702 W 2ND ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 179, 0.034, SW H50 PRESTIGE STATIONS IN 702 W SECOND CA HIST UST, CA CHMIRS Higher 179, 0.034, SW H49 ARCO PETROLEUM PR50D 702 W 2ND CA LUST, CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA SWEEPS UST, CA CERS...Higher 179, 0.034, SW K48 DRAPER GARAGE 264 E EDR Hist Auto Lower 171, 0.032, ESE G47 A 1 HANDBAG 516 4TH ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 161, 0.030, NE 46 UNOCAL #6968 187 F ST CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 156, 0.030, South D45 ROSS DRESS FOR LESS 555 W. 2ND ST, STE B CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA CERS Lower 147, 0.028, SSE D44 FOOD 4 LESS #301 555 W 2ND ST CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA HAZNET, CA San Bern. Co.... Lower 147, 0.028, SSE D43 FOOD 4 LESS #301 555 W 2ND ST STE A RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 147, 0.028, SSE D42 ROSS DRESS FOR LESS 555 W 2ND ST STE B RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 147, 0.028, SSE L41 DEL GEORGE SERVICE 710 W 4TH ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 146, 0.028, NW D40 G & M OIL SS #67 187 F ST CA LUST Lower 146, 0.028, SSE E39 HUNTING CHAS DO CLNR 410 N F ST EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 143, 0.027, North

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:

CAROUSEL MALL
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS Packet Pg. 1213
6944754.2s Page 4
S116 SAN BERNARDINO WATER 195 D ST CA LUST Lower 616, 0.117, ESE 115 STANDARD STA 607 5TH ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 612, 0.116, North U114 AMER MOHAMED 797 W 2ND ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 611, 0.116, SW U113 TEXACO SERVICE STATI 797 W 2ND ST CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Higher 611, 0.116, SW U112 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 797 W 2ND STREET CA SWEEPS UST, CA HIST UST Higher 611, 0.116, SW U111 TEXACO SERVICE STATI 797 02ND CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Higher 611, 0.116, SW R110 AT&T MOBILITY - ES00 2794 W 2ND ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA CERS Higher 583, 0.110, SW T109 PENNANT CLEANERS & D 418 H EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 558, 0.106, WNW S108 DAVIS GARAGE 439 2ND ST EDR Hist Auto Lower 453, 0.086, ESE N107 DOUGLAS MOTORCYCLES 390 N H ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit Higher 431, 0.082, WNW N106 63 MOTORSPORTS INC D 390 N H ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 431, 0.082, WNW 105 DODGE BROS SERVICE S 435 4TH EDR Hist Auto Lower 407, 0.077, ENE R104 DEL TACO #47 770 W 2ND ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit Higher 391, 0.074, WSW M103 TOLL BLDG 455 2ND ST CA HIST UST, CA HAZNET, CA HWTS Lower 384, 0.073, ESE M102 AT&T CORP - LB786 455 W 2ND ST CA UST Lower 384, 0.073, ESE M101 TOLL BLDG. 455 W 2ND ST CA HIST UST Lower 384, 0.073, ESE M100 AT & T COMM ( SAN BE 455 SECOND ST CA SWEEPS UST, CA EMI Lower 384, 0.073, ESE M99 AT&T CORP - LB786 455 W 2ND ST CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA HIST UST, CA CERS TANKS, CA...Lower 384, 0.073, ESE M98 AT&T COMMUNICATIONS 455 WEST 2ND ST RCRA-LQG Lower 384, 0.073, ESE M97 AT&T TOLL BLDG 455 W 2ND ST CA UST Lower 384, 0.073, ESE Q96 JULIAN OIL CO GAS ST 896 3RD EDR Hist Auto Higher 378, 0.072, West Q95 RHYNARDS SIGNAL 894 3RD ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 376, 0.071, West 94 CENTRAL CITY MALL 295 CENTRAL CITY MAL RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 376, 0.071, East Q93 COLE AUTOMOTIVE 888 3RD ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 372, 0.070, West H92 DOLLAR TREE #05119 761 W 2ND ST STE A CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA HAZNET, CA San Bern. Co.... Higher 361, 0.068, SW H91 DOLLAR TREE #05119 761 W 2ND ST STE A RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 361, 0.068, SW O90 99 CENTS ONLY STORES 648 W 4TH ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 354, 0.067, North O89 99 CENTS ONLY STORES 648 W 4TH ST CA HAZNET, CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA HWTS Higher 354, 0.067, North Q88 HOME HAND LAUNDRY 854 3RD EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 348, 0.066, West N87 CHAILLE A C AUTO SER 832 3RD EDR Hist Auto Higher 333, 0.063, West I86 LARSEN DYE WORKS 425 E NORTH EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 322, 0.061, NE 85 MARTINEZ ALEJANDRO 668 W 4TH ST STE A EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 321, 0.061, NNW H84 MARSHALLS 0269 741 W 2ND ST CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA HAZNET, CA San Bern. Co.... Higher 320, 0.061, SW H83 MARSHALLS 0269 741 W 2ND ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 320, 0.061, SW P82 FAIRVIEW FORD SALES 292 NO G ST CA HIST UST Higher 311, 0.059, WSW P81 FAIRVIEW FORD SALES 292 N G ST RCRA-LQG, CA AST, CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA HIST UST,... Higher 311, 0.059, WSW I80 CALTRANS CALIFORNIA 464 W 4TH ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 310, 0.059, ENE I79 CALTRANS D-8/FACILIT 464 W 4TH ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 310, 0.059, ENE I78 ST CALIFORNIA DEPT O 464 W 4TH ST CA CERS TANKS, CA HAZNET, CA San Bern. Co. Permit,... Lower 310, 0.059, ENE

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:

CAROUSEL MALL
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS Packet Pg. 1214
6944754.2s Page 5
AE155 DD’S DISCOUNTS #5118 781 W 2ND ST STE B RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 871, 0.165, SW AE154 DD’S DISCOUNTS #5118 781 W 2ND ST STE B CA HAZNET, CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA HWTS Higher 871, 0.165, SW AE153 DD’S DISCOUNTS #5118 781 W. 2ND ST, STE B CA CERS HAZ WASTE Higher 871, 0.165, SW AD152 XLNT FOOD SERVICE 444 W RIALTO AVENUE CA HIST UST, CA HAZNET, CA HWTS Lower 839, 0.159, SE AD151 XLNT FOOD SERVICE 444 W RIALTO AVE CA SWEEPS UST, CA HIST UST Lower 839, 0.159, SE Y150 PETE’S ROAD SERVICE 747 W RIALTO AVENUE CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA HAZNET, CA CERS, CA HWTS Lower 835, 0.158, SSW Y149 VIKING TIRE 747 CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 835, 0.158, SSW AC148 VERIZON WIRELESS-SAN 351 N I ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit Higher 828, 0.157, West AC147 VERIZON WIRELESS: SA 357 N I ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit Higher 826, 0.156, West 146 655 W. RIALTO AVE. 655 W. RIALTO AVE. CA ENVIROSTOR Lower 813, 0.154, South X145 SUN CO SAN BERNARDIN 399 N D ST RCRA-SQG, CA EMI, CA San Bern. Co. Permit Lower 784, 0.148, ENE AB144 IN-N-OUT BURGER (FOR 795 WEST 5TH STREET CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Higher 774, 0.147, NW AA143 SAN BERNARDINO TRANS 599 W RIALTO AVE CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA CERS Lower 766, 0.145, South Z142 CI-WATER DEPARTMENT 195 N D ST CA UST Lower 764, 0.145, ESE Z141 SB WATER DEPARTMENT 195 N D ST CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA CERS TANKS, CA San Bern. Co.... Lower 764, 0.145, ESE Z140 SAN BERNARDINO MUN W 195 N D ST CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, CA EMI Lower 764, 0.145, ESE Z139 SB WATER DEPARTMENT 195 N D ST CA UST Lower 764, 0.145, ESE Z138 WATER DEPARTMENT YAR 195 NORTH D STREET CA HIST UST Lower 764, 0.145, ESE Z137 WATER DEPARTMENT YAR 195 N D ST CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Lower 764, 0.145, ESE W136 CITY OF SAN BERNARDI PROPOSED TRANSIT VIL CA ENVIROSTOR Lower 750, 0.142, SSE Z135 CITY OF SAN BERNARDI 195 NORTH "D" STREET RCRA-LQG Lower 743, 0.141, ESE 134 LAW LIBRARY FOR SAN 402 NORTH D STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 742, 0.141, ENE U133 EXXON SERVICE STA #7 797 W 002ND ST CA FID UST Higher 721, 0.137, WSW U132 BLDG 169 2ND AND H STREET CA HIST UST Higher 705, 0.134, WSW U131 BLDG. 169 2ND & H. STREET CA HIST UST Higher 705, 0.134, WSW Y130 SALLY BEAUTY SUPPLIE 721 W 2ND ST STE B CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA HAZNET, CA San Bern. Co.... Lower 694, 0.131, SSW Y129 SALLY BEAUTY SUPPLIE 721 W 2ND ST STE B RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 694, 0.131, SSW W128 LEMANS NISSAN INC 101 N E ST CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 688, 0.130, SE W127 EXPRESS QUALITY HAND 101 N E ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 688, 0.130, SE W126 EXPRESS QUALITY CARW 101 N "E" ST CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA... Lower 686, 0.130, SE X125 CHASE BANK 330 N D ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 660, 0.125, East S124 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 200 N D ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit Lower 659, 0.125, ESE 123 POMMIER & GREGORY GA 496 E NORTH EDR Hist Auto Higher 656, 0.124, NNE X122 ORIENTAL DYE WORKS 362 D EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 655, 0.124, ENE V121 SANJAY LLC C/O SANJA 234 NORTH D STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 654, 0.124, ESE T120 SKANSKA RADOS (215 W 444 N H ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA CIWQS Higher 649, 0.123, NW W119 CLARENDON & CLARENDO 108 N E ST EDR Hist Auto Lower 649, 0.123, SSE W118 S B OIL CO 108 E NORTH EDR Hist Auto Lower 649, 0.123, SSE V117 VANIR DEV 290 NORTH D ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 628, 0.119, East

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:

CAROUSEL MALL
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS Packet Pg. 1215
6944754.2s Page 6
AM194 SAN BERNARDINO RECYC 144 S G ST CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA CERS TANKS, CA NPDES, CA San...Lower 1258, 0.238, SSW AM193 SAN BERNARDINO CENTR 144 S G ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1258, 0.238, SSW AM192 SA RECYCLING 144 S G ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1258, 0.238, SSW AL191 BEKINS MOVING & STOR 134 S E ST CA HIST UST Lower 1222, 0.231, SSE AL190 BEKINS MOVING AND ST 134 SOUTH E STREET CA HIST UST Lower 1222, 0.231, SSE AK189 CENTRAL CITY MOVING 110 S D ST CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA Cortese, CA San Bern. Co.... Lower 1199, 0.227, SE AK188 NEW CINGULAR WIRELES 110 SOUTH D ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1199, 0.227, SE AK187 CENTRAL CITY MOVING 110 SO D STREET CA HIST UST Lower 1199, 0.227, SE AI186 SO CAL GAS/SAN BERNA NW CNR OF 2ND AND AR CA HIST CORTESE Lower 1182, 0.224, ESE AJ185 ALLEN PROPERTY 895 2ND STREET CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Higher 1167, 0.221, WSW AJ184 ALLEN, MICHAEL & BRE 895 W 2ND ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit Higher 1167, 0.221, WSW AJ183 SERVICE STATION 895 W SECOND ST CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Higher 1167, 0.221, WSW AF182 VERIZON WIRELESS: MA 532 N D ST CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA CERS Higher 1165, 0.221, NE AF181 SAN BERNARDINO COUNT P. O. BOX 569 NY MANIFEST Higher 1153, 0.218, NE AF180 RODINE, EDWARD 4008 HWY 138 CA UST Higher 1153, 0.218, NE AI179 SAN BERNARDINO 344 W 2ND ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1132, 0.214, ESE AE178 PACIFIC VAN & STORAG 815 W RIALTO AVE CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Higher 1128, 0.214, SW 177 SECCOMBE LAKE PARK 7TH ST CA LUST, CA CERS Lower 1082, 0.205, ENE AH176 UNOCAL #2281 300 CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 1069, 0.202, East AI175 SAN BERNARDINO GAS W NWC OF 2ND AND ARROW EDR MGP Lower 1049, 0.199, ESE AH174 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 303 W 003RD ST CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 1042, 0.197, East AG173 ARMANDO’S TRANSMISSI 116 S STODDARD AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1027, 0.195, SE AG172 LE MANS NISSAN 116 S STODDARD RCRA-SQG Lower 1027, 0.195, SE AG171 LEMANS NISSAN 116 S STODDARD RCRA-SQG, CA CERS HAZ WASTE, FINDS, ECHO, CA... Lower 1027, 0.195, SE AA170 TRANSIT VILLAGE CORE 177 SOUTH F STREET US BROWNFIELDS Lower 1020, 0.193, South AC169 MB COLLISION CENTER 274 N I ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 949, 0.180, West AC168 BIG Z AUTO WORKS 274 N I ST CA HAZNET, CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA HWTS Higher 949, 0.180, West AC167 BIG Z AUTOWORKS INC 274 N I ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 949, 0.180, West AF166 LA MANCHA (FORMER MO 415 5TH ST CA LUST, CA CERS Higher 926, 0.175, NE AF165 MOBIL OIL-PARKER, RO 415 W 5TH ST CA LUST, CA SWEEPS UST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Higher 926, 0.175, NE AF164 LA MANCHA DEVELOPMEN 415 5TH STREET CA LUST, CA Cortese Higher 926, 0.175, NE AB163 INCO SERVICE STATION 796 WEST 5TH STREET CA UST Higher 926, 0.175, NW AB162 INCO SERVICE STATION 796 CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Higher 926, 0.175, NW AB161 INCO SERVICE STATION 796 W 5TH ST CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Higher 926, 0.175, NW AB160 INCO 796 W 005TH ST CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Higher 920, 0.174, NW AD159 SCE STODDARD SUBSTAT 105 S STODDARD AVE CA AST, CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA CERS Lower 914, 0.173, SE AD158 ARMANDO’S TRANSMISSI 108 S STODDARD AVE CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA... Lower 898, 0.170, SE AC157 HOLMES ICE AND COLD 300 NORTH I STREET CA HIST UST Higher 880, 0.167, West AC156 HOLMES ICE & COLD ST 300 N I ST CA HIST UST Higher 880, 0.167, West

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:

CAROUSEL MALL
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS Packet Pg. 1216
6944754.2s Page 7
AV233 MORRISON HOPE, INC. 205 ARROWHEAD AVE CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 2197, 0.416, SE 232 BARSTOW UNIFIED SCHO 320 MOUNTAIN VIEW N CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA HIST CORTESE, CA CERS Lower 2099, 0.398, East AW231 SMOOTH MOVE 207 WALKINSHAW ST CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA CERS Lower 2054, 0.389, SSW AW230 SMOOTH MOVE 207 WALKINSHAW ST CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 2054, 0.389, SSW 229 JONES ELEMENTARY SCH SEVENTH STREET/F STR CA ENVIROSTOR, CA SCH Higher 2052, 0.389, North AV228 GALLAGHER BEAUTY & B 190 ARROWHEAD CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 2023, 0.383, SE 227 JOEY’S BODY SHOP 916 6TH ST CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Higher 1998, 0.378, NW 226 INLAND BEVERAGE COMP 223 S G ST CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Lower 1888, 0.358, South 225 SUPER CAL EXPRESS 958 W RIALTO CA LUST, CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, CA Cortese, CA... Higher 1830, 0.347, WSW AU224 HANFORD FOUNDRY CO 119 S ARROWHEAD AVE SEMS, CA CPS-SLIC, CA HIST UST, RCRA NonGen / NLR,... Lower 1754, 0.332, SE AU223 HANFORD FOUNDRY 119 SOUTH ARROWHEAD CA ENVIROSTOR, CA CPS-SLIC, CA VCP, CA DEED, CA... Lower 1754, 0.332, SE AT222 SOUTWEST METAL COMPA 740 W CONGRESS ST SEMS, RCRA-LQG, ECHO Lower 1677, 0.318, SSW AT221 SB CONGRESS LLC (FOR 740 CONGRESS STREET CA ENVIROSTOR, CA DEED Lower 1677, 0.318, SSW AS220 CA DEPT. OF TRANS GA 247 3RD ST CA LUST Lower 1670, 0.316, East AS219 AUTO POOL VEH GAR 247 W 3RD ST CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Lower 1670, 0.316, East AR218 CALTRANS PANARAMA PT HWY 18, MILEPOST 15. CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Lower 1625, 0.308, ENE AR217 CALTRANS PANARAMA PT HWY 18, MILEPOST 15. CA LUST Lower 1625, 0.308, ENE AP216 PRESTIGE STATIONS IN 605 N H ST CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Higher 1623, 0.307, NNW AP215 ARCO #5082 605 H ST CA LUST Higher 1609, 0.305, NNW AQ214 SIGNAL OIL CO. 173 SOUTH G STREET CA ENVIROSTOR Lower 1582, 0.300, SSW AQ213 SIGNAL OIL CO 173 SO. G ST SEMS-ARCHIVE Lower 1582, 0.300, SSW AP212 CHEVRON 598 H CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Higher 1528, 0.289, NNW AP211 95637 598 N H ST CA LUST, CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA HIST UST, CA... Higher 1461, 0.277, NW 210 SAN BERNARDINO PIPE 939 CA EMI, CA HIST CORTESE, CA San Bern. Co. Permit Higher 1433, 0.271, WSW AM209 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 155 G ST CA LUST, CA CHMIRS, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 1410, 0.267, SSW AM208 SAN BERNARDINO 155 S G ST CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Lower 1410, 0.267, SSW AK207 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS C SEC OF RIALTO AND SO EDR MGP Lower 1334, 0.253, SE AO206 STATION #2281 300 W 3RD ST CA HIST UST Lower 1306, 0.247, East AO205 UNION OIL SERVICE ST 300 W 3RD ST CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Lower 1306, 0.247, East AO204 UNION OIL SERVICE ST 300 W THIRD STREET CA HIST UST, CA HAZNET, CA HWTS Lower 1306, 0.247, East AO203 STATION 2281 300 WEST THIRD STREE CA HIST UST Lower 1306, 0.247, East AO202 UNION OIL SERVICE ST 300 W 3 RD ST CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 1306, 0.247, East AK201 U-HAUL CENTER OF CEN 110 D ST CA LUST, CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 1297, 0.246, SE AI200 SAN BERNARDINO UST 306 W 2ND ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1281, 0.243, ESE 199 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 124 S F ST CA HAZNET, CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA HWTS Lower 1279, 0.242, South AI198 SO CAL GAS/SAN BERNA NW CNR OF 2ND AND AR CA ENVIROSTOR, CA VCP Lower 1269, 0.240, ESE AO197 COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR 323 WEST COURT STREE RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1267, 0.240, East AN196 SBCTA 958 W. 3RD STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1259, 0.238, West AN195 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION 958 WEST 3RD STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1259, 0.238, West

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:

CAROUSEL MALL
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS Packet Pg. 1217
6944754.2s Page 8
AY252 SAN BERNARDINO ENG S CA ENVIROSTOR Lower 4564, 0.864, SSE AY251 SAN BERNARDINO ENG S FUDS Lower 4558, 0.863, SSE
250 BURBANK ELEMENTARY 198 WEST MILL STREET CA ENVIROSTOR, CA SCH, CA CERS Lower 4424, 0.838, SSE 249 TERMINIX INTERNATION 440 S SIERRA WAY CA ENVIROSTOR, CA VCP, CA HIST UST, CA San Bern.... Lower 4381, 0.830, SE 248 RAILROAD STORAGE YAR 570 WEST MILL STREET CA ENVIROSTOR Lower 3893, 0.737, South 247 QUALITY PLATING INC. 456 SOUTH I ST. CA ENVIROSTOR, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 3870, 0.733, SSW 246 BURBANK II ELEMENTAR RIALTO AVENUE/ALLEN CA ENVIROSTOR, CA SCH Lower 3827, 0.725, ESE 245 HAMBY CORP., VALENCI 27704 AVENUE SCOTTRI CA ENVIROSTOR Higher 3702, 0.701, WNW 244 BIG BASIN STATE PARK CA WMUDS/SWAT, CA Notify 65 Higher 3699, 0.701, NW 243 HIGH SCHOOL NO. 8 PA 1426 EAST 6TH STREET CA ENVIROSTOR, CA SCH, CA CERS Lower 3345, 0.634, ENE 242 TROJAN PLATING CO. # 268 SOUTH MOUNTAIN V CA ENVIROSTOR Lower 3092, 0.586, SE 241 LA PLACITA # 2 PROPO 1169 WEST 2ND STREET CA ENVIROSTOR Higher 3008, 0.570, WSW 240 QUICKSILVER BELLS ME 1019 W 6TH STREET SEMS Higher 2537, 0.480, NW 239 ONE DAY PAINT AND BO 288 S E ST CA LUST, CA CERS HAZ WASTE, CA SWEEPS UST, CA... Lower 2423, 0.459, SSE 238 CHUBY CHASSIS 275 S G ST CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Lower 2385, 0.452, South AV237 MORRISON HOPE, INC. 205 S ARROWHEAD AVE CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA San Bern. Co. Permit, CA... Lower 2299, 0.435, SE AX236 FUTURE POLICE STATIO 700 N D ST CA LUST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Higher 2277, 0.431, NNE AX235 FUTURE POLICE STATIO 700 D CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Higher 2254, 0.427, NNE AV234 GALLAHER BEAUTY & BA 190 S ARROWHEAD AVE CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA Cortese, CA CERS Lower 2216, 0.420, SE

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:

CAROUSEL MALL
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS Packet Pg. 1218

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9

TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.

DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases:

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites CA RESPONSE State Response Sites
Packet Pg. 1219

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities CA SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
CA BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
CA SWRCY Recycler Database
CA HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register CA HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database
CA CDL Clandestine Drug Labs
CA Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
CA PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
CA AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing Local Land Records
CA LIENS Environmental Liens Listing
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
CA LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing
CA MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing
CA SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
Packet Pg. 1220

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11
Other Ascertainable Records
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information

EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan
CA CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List
CA ENF Enforcement Action Listing
CA Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing

CA ICE ICE
CA HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing
CA HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
CA MINES Mines Site Location Listing
CA MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing
CA PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing
CA PROC Certified Processors Database
CA UIC UIC Listing

CA UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER)
CA WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing
CA WIP Well Investigation Program Case List

CA MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER)

CA PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER)
CA WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing

CA NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER)

CA OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER)
Packet Pg. 1221

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12

CA PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER)

CA SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER)
CA WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
CA RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List CA RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.

Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.

Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed.

Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.

Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL: Also known as Superfund, the National Priority List database is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund program. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA.

A review of the NPL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/25/2022 has revealed that there is 1 NPL site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ NEWMARK GROUND WATER BUNKER HILL GROUND W NNW 1/2 - 1 (0.776 mi.) 0 9 Cerclis ID:: 902439
EPA Id: CAD981434517
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders SEMS: SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Packet Pg. 1222

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.

A review of the SEMS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/25/2022 has revealed that there are 3 SEMS sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ QUICKSILVER BELLS ME 1019 W 6TH STREET NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.480 mi.) 240 773 Site ID: 0908695
EPA Id: CAN000908695
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTWEST METAL COMPA 740 W CONGRESS ST SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.318 mi.) AT222 702 Site ID: 0902649
EPA Id: CAT000624106
HANFORD FOUNDRY CO 119 S ARROWHEAD AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.332 mi.) AU224 721 Site ID: 0903131
EPA Id: CAD981630833
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE: SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site.

A review of the SEMS-ARCHIVE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/25/2022 has revealed that there is 1 SEMS-ARCHIVE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SIGNAL OIL CO 173 SO. G ST SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.) AQ213 664 Site ID: 0900045
EPA Id: CAD982360364
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or Packet Pg. 1223

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14
dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.

A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/28/2022 has revealed that there are 3 RCRA-LQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FAIRVIEW FORD SALES 292 N G ST WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.059 mi.) P81 232 EPA ID:: CAD981442247
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AT&T COMMUNICATIONS 455 WEST 2ND ST ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.073 mi.) M98 308 EPA ID:: CAT080015050
CITY OF SAN BERNARDI 195 NORTH "D" STREET ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) Z135 402 EPA ID:: CAL000003717
RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.

A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/28/2022 has revealed that there are 7 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AUTO EXPRESS 2200 144 CENTRAL CITY MAL 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B3 38 EPA ID:: CAR000089599
AEROBACK MEDICAL GRO 740 W 4TH ST NW 0 - 1/8 (0.039 mi.) L65 198 EPA ID:: CAD983653759
BEST CLEANERS 624 W 4TH ST N 0 - 1/8 (0.058 mi.) O72 204 EPA ID:: CAD981614878
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FAMILY CLEANERS 663 W SECOND ST SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.025 mi.) J33 68 EPA ID:: CAD983645672
SUN CO SAN BERNARDIN 399 N D ST ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.148 mi.) X145 438 EPA ID:: CAD008272510
LEMANS NISSAN 116 S STODDARD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) AG171 520 EPA ID:: CAD981969967
LE MANS NISSAN 116 S STODDARD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) AG172 552 EPA ID:: CAD981615248
Packet Pg. 1224

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
CA ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites.

A review of the CA ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/24/2022 has revealed that there are 17 CA ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ JONES ELEMENTARY SCH SEVENTH STREET/F STR N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.389 mi.) 229 738 Facility Id: 36010016
Status: Certified
LA PLACITA # 2 PROPO 1169 WEST 2ND STREET WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.570 mi.) 241 774 Facility Id: 60000928
Status: No Action Required
HAMBY CORP., VALENCI 27704 AVENUE SCOTTRI WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.701 mi.) 245 782 Facility Id: 71003071
Status: Refer: Other Agency
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CITY OF SAN BERNARDI PROPOSED TRANSIT VIL SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.142 mi.) W136 405 Facility Id: 60000991
Status: No Further Action
655 W. RIALTO AVE. 655 W. RIALTO AVE. S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.154 mi.) 146 441 Facility Id: 36000020
Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency
SO CAL GAS/SAN BERNA NW CNR OF 2ND AND AR ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.) AI198 622 Facility Id: 36490111
Status: Inactive - Action Required
SIGNAL OIL CO. 173 SOUTH G STREET SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.) AQ214 665 Facility Id: 36130006
Status: No Further Action
SB CONGRESS LLC (FOR 740 CONGRESS STREET SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.318 mi.) AT221 695 Facility Id: 36330036
Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only
HANFORD FOUNDRY 119 SOUTH ARROWHEAD SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.332 mi.) AU223 709 Facility Id: 36330011
Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only
TROJAN PLATING CO. # 268 SOUTH MOUNTAIN V SE 1/2 - 1 (0.586 mi.) 242 775 Facility Id: 36340032
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
HIGH SCHOOL NO. 8 PA 1426 EAST 6TH STREET ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.634 mi.) 243 777 Packet Pg. 1225

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16
Facility Id: 36820002
Status: No Further Action
BURBANK II ELEMENTAR RIALTO AVENUE/ALLEN ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.725 mi.) 246 783 Facility Id: 60000046
Status: Certified
QUALITY PLATING INC. 456 SOUTH I ST. SSW 1/2 - 1 (0.733 mi.) 247 790 Facility Id: 36340031
Status: Refer: Local Agency
RAILROAD STORAGE YAR 570 WEST MILL STREET S 1/2 - 1 (0.737 mi.) 248 792 Facility Id: 36400001
Status: No Further Action
TERMINIX INTERNATION 440 S SIERRA WAY SE 1/2 - 1 (0.830 mi.) 249 793 Facility Id: 36070008
Status: Active
BURBANK ELEMENTARY 198 WEST MILL STREET SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.838 mi.) 250 798 Facility Id: 36820001
Status: No Further Action
SAN BERNARDINO ENG S SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.864 mi.) AY252 801
Facility Id: 80000442
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
CA LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

A review of the CA LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 51 CA LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FIRESTONE STORES 677 W 4TH ST 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A2 32 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607129188
Status: Completed - Case Closed
SAN BERNARDINO 144 CENTRAL CITY MAL 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 4 41 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T10000001491
Status: Open - Site Assessment
FIRESTONE STORE (BFS 677 W. 4TH ST 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A5 47 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Remediation Plan
Global ID: T0607129188
ARCO PETROLEUM PR50D 702 W 2ND SW 0 - 1/8 (0.034 mi.) H49 134 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100158
Status: Completed - Case Closed
TEXACO SERVICE STATI 797 02ND SW 0 - 1/8 (0.116 mi.) U111 357 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Packet Pg. 1226

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17
Facility Status: Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100274
TEXACO SERVICE STATI 797 W 2ND ST SW 0 - 1/8 (0.116 mi.) U113 361 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100274
Status: Completed - Case Closed
IN-N-OUT BURGER (FOR 795 WEST 5TH STREET NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) AB144 431 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T10000002949
Status: Completed - Case Closed
INCO SERVICE STATION 796 W 5TH ST NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.175 mi.) AB161 481 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100231
Status: Completed - Case Closed
INCO SERVICE STATION 796 NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.175 mi.) AB162 490 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Pollution Characterization
Global ID: T0607100231
LA MANCHA DEVELOPMEN 415 5TH STREET NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.175 mi.) AF164 492 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed
Global ID: T0607129156
MOBIL OIL-PARKER, RO 415 W 5TH ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.175 mi.) AF165 493 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100080
Status: Completed - Case Closed
LA MANCHA (FORMER MO 415 5TH ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.175 mi.) AF166 497 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Facility Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0607129156
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100080
ALLEN PROPERTY 895 2ND STREET WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.221 mi.) AJ185 572 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Facility Status: Pollution Characterization
Global Id: T0607199300
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global ID: T0607199300
95637 598 N H ST NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.277 mi.) AP211 652
Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100292
Status: Completed - Case Closed
CHEVRON 598 H NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.289 mi.) AP212 663
Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100292
ARCO #5082 605 H ST NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.305 mi.) AP215 667 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway
Packet Pg. 1227

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18
Global ID: T0607100042
PRESTIGE STATIONS IN 605 N H ST NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.307 mi.) AP216 668 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100042
Status: Completed - Case Closed
SUPER CAL EXPRESS 958 W RIALTO WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.347 mi.) 225 727 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100593
Status: Completed - Case Closed
JOEY’S BODY SHOP 916 6TH ST NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.378 mi.) 227 733 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Facility Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0607100146
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100146
FUTURE POLICE STATIO 700 D NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.427 mi.) AX235 754 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100378
FUTURE POLICE STATIO 700 N D ST NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.431 mi.) AX236 755 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100378
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ARCO #6227 702 SW 0 - 1/8 (0.017 mi.) H20 54
Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway
Global ID: T0607100158
ONE DAY PAINT & BODY 288 E ST E 0 - 1/8 (0.025 mi.) K37 107 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100291
G & M OIL SS #67 187 F ST SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.028 mi.) D40 109 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100599
UNOCAL #6968 187 F ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.030 mi.) 46 132
Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100034
UNION OIL SERVICE ST 187 N F ST SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) D62 176 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100034
Global Id: T0607100599
Status: Completed - Case Closed
SAN BERNARDINO WATER 195 D ST ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.117 mi.) S116 364 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Pollution Characterization
Packet Pg. 1228

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6944754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19
Global ID: T0607100308
WATER DEPARTMENT YAR 195 N D ST ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.145 mi.) Z137 406 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100308
Status: Completed - Case Closed
VIKING TIRE 747 SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.158 mi.) Y149 443
Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Preliminary site assessment underway
Global ID: T0607100148
PETE’S ROAD SERVICE 747 W RIALTO AVENUE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.158 mi.) Y150 445 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100148
Status: Completed - Case Closed
UNOCAL #2281 300 E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) AH176 559
Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100091
SECCOMBE LAKE PARK 7TH ST ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.205 mi.) 177 560 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100220
Status: Completed - Case Closed
CENTRAL CITY MOVING 110 S D ST SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) AK189 581 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100590
Global Id: T0607100044
Status: Completed - Case Closed
U-HAUL CENTER OF CEN 110 D ST SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) AK201 634 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100044
UNION OIL SERVICE ST 300 W 3RD ST E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.247 mi.) AO205 642 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100091
Status: Completed - Case Closed
SAN BERNARDINO 155 S G ST SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.267 mi.) AM208 645 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100214
Status: Completed - Case Closed
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 155 G ST SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.267 mi.) AM209 648 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed
Global ID: T0607100214
CALTRANS PANARAMA PT HWY 18, MILEPOST 15. ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.308 mi.) AR217 688 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Global Id: T0607100307
Status: Completed - Case Closed
CALTRANS PANARAMA PT HWY 18, MILEPOST 15. ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.308 mi.) AR218 689 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Preliminary site assessment underway
Global ID: T0607100307
AUTO POOL VEH GAR 247 W 3RD ST E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.316 mi.) AS219 691 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Packet Pg. 1229

Mayor and City CouncilDecember 7, 2022

Mayor and City Council
December 7, 2022