Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Mayor and City Council
June 7, 2023

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
June 7, 2023
Body
Mayor and City Council
Pages
27
Original file
60.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sanbernardino.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
DENYING APPEAL 23-01 THEREBY UPHOLDING THE
PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT 21-18 AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR
NECESSITY LETTER 21-07 ALLOWING A NEW
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) TYPE 21
LICENSE (OFF-SALE GENERAL: BEER, WINE, AND
DISTILLED SPIRITS) LOCATED AT 1820 W. 5 TH STREET
(APN: 0138-081-19) WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL
GENERAL (CG-1) ZONE AND FINDING THE STATUTORY

EXEMPTION UNDER THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.

WHEREAS, on September 9, 2021, pursuant to the requirements of Section 19.36.020 (Conditional Use Permits and Minor Use permits) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, an application for Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 was duly submitted by:

Property Owner: Zhou Hui
1419 Warwick Avenue
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
Project Applicant: Fernando Castro
2715 W. Foothill Boulevard Suite 1
San Bernardino, CA 92376
Parcel Address: 1820 W. 5 th Street
APN: 0138-081-19
Lot Area: 0.45 acres
WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 is a request for new Alcoholic Beverage Control Type-21 (Off-Sale General: Beer, Wine, and Distilled Spirits) License within an existing vacant building proposed as a convenience store containing approximately 2,024 square feet on a parcel containing approximately 0.45 acres; and WHEREAS, the Planning Division of the Community Development Department has reviewed Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 for consistency with the City of San Bernardino General Plan and compliance with the City of San Bernardino Development Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to requirements of Section 15060 (c) of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Division of the Community Development Department

Packet Pg.
403

Resolution No. 2023-060
Resolution No. 2023-060
June 7, 2023

Page 2 of 7 ends

evaluated Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 and determined that it is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Statutorily Exemption Section 15270 (Projects Which Are Disapproved) of the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, on August 22, 2022, pursuant to the requirements of Section 19.44.030 (Project Review) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application and moved Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 to the Planning Commission for consideration; and
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino held a duly noticed public hearing to consider public testimony and the staff report, and adopted Resolution 2023-002 denying Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07; and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2023, the applicant filed Appeal 23-01 to appeal the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07; and
WHEREAS, notice of the April 19, 2023 public hearing for the Mayor and City Council's consideration of this proposed Resolution was published in The Sun newspaper on April 8, 2023, and was mailed to the owners and tenants of the properties located within 1,000 feet of the subject property in accordance with Development Code Chapter 19.52 (Hearing and Appeals); and
WHEREAS, at the meeting of the Mayor and City Council of May 3, 2023 the item was pulled from the meeting agenda; and
WHEREAS, notice of the June 7, 2023 public hearing for the Mayor and City Council's consideration of this proposed Resolution was published in The Sun newspaper on May 27, 2023, and was mailed to the owners and tenants of the properties located within 1,000 feet of the subject property in accordance with Development Code Chapter 19.52 (Hearing and Appeals); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.52 (Hearing and Appeals) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Mayor and City Council has the authority to take action on Appeal 23-01 for Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Packet Pg.
404

Resolution No. 2023-060
Resolution No. 2023-060
June 7, 2023

Page 3 of 7 ends

SECTION 2.Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. As the decision-making body for the project, the Mayor and City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the administrative record for Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07. Based upon the facts and information contained in the administrative record, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Mayor and City Council, the Mayor and City Council finds, as follows:
(1) The administrative record has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, and (2) In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(5) and Section 15270 (Projects Which are Disapproved) of the CEQA Guidelines, the Mayor and City Council has determined that consideration of Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 is exempt from CEQA due to the fact that the Mayor and City Council is denying Appeal 23-01 thereby upholding the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07; and (3) The determination of CEQA exemption reflects the independent judgment of the Mayor and City Council.

SECTION 3.Findings of Fact – Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07:

Finding No. 1:The proposed alcoholic beverage sales activity establishment is located in a zoning district in which the establishment is a permitted use.

Finding of Fact:Pursuant to Section 19.06.020 (Development Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses) and Section 19.06.030(2)(B) (Specific Standards for Commercial Zones – Alcohol Beverage Sales) Article II (Conditional Use Permits for New Alcoholic Beverage Sales Activities) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, a business with an Alcohol Beverage Control license is a permitted land use within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone, however the subject site in which Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 is proposed is located within Census Tract 43.02 where the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license concentration standards allow for a maximum of three (3) off-sale licenses. There are currently five (5) existing active off-sale licenses within this census tract, there is currently an over concentration of two (2) off-sale ABC licenses within this census tract and the approval of the requested ABC Type 21(Off-Sale General) license would add to the overconcentration. The subject property under Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 would not satisfy the distancing requirements for convenience stores within proximity of a one-mile radius of another convenience store nor the distancing restrictions from a sensitive land use (a park) per

Packet Pg.
405

Resolution No. 2023-060
Resolution No. 2023-060
June 7, 2023

Page 4 of 7 ends

Development Code requirements Section III(A)(1)(2) (Locational Restrictions) as follows:
✓West Side Food and Liquor - 856 Medical Center Drive
(approximately 2,700 feet away)
✓Rancho Ria Liquor - 2000 W. Rialto Boulevard (approximately 3,500 feet away)
✓Nunez Park and Ruben Campos Community Center - 1717 W. 5th Street Park (approximately 480 feet away)
Therefore, Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 is not consistent with the requirements of the City’s Development Code.

Finding No. 2:Finding or Public Convenience or Necessity (Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4 (b) (2), if the activity will be located in an area that has been determined by the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to have an undue concentration of licenses as defined in Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4 (a).

Finding of Fact:The proposed project is not consistent with the Business and Professionals Code Section 23958.4(b)(2). Within Census Tract 43.02, the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license concentration standards allow for a maximum of three (3) off-sale licenses. There are currently five (5) existing active off-sale licenses within this census tract (43.02) and currently an over concentration of two (2) off-sale ABC licenses.

Finding No. 3A finding that the alcoholic beverage sales activity will not aggravate existing problems in the neighborhood created by the sales of alcohol such as loitering, public drunkenness, alcoholic beverage sales to minors, noise, and littering.

Finding of Fact:The Police Department has reviewed the application for the proposed new ABC Type-21 (Off-Sale General: Beer, Wine, and Distilled Spirits) License for the proposed project “Mikey’s Market”, and conducted an investigation based on the information provided and crime statistics within the surrounding area (Attachment E). The Police Department has indicated that there are a total of 219 reporting districts within the city, and that there was an average of 68 crimes per reporting district during the course of the past year. It was determined that the subject reporting district had a total of 91 crimes within a one-year period at the proposed location which only equates to .6% versus the City-wide average of 68 crimes per reporting district throughout the city and does not exceed the average

Packet Pg.
406

Resolution No. 2023-060
Resolution No. 2023-060
June 7, 2023

Page 5 of 7 ends

percentage to recommend denial. However, the Police Department has not provided a recommendation of approval or denial.

Finding No. 4Their proposed establishment will not detrimentally affect nearby neighborhoods considering the distance of the alcohol establishment to residential buildings, schools, parks, playgrounds or recreational uses, nonprofit youth facilities, places of worship, hospitals, alcohol or other drug abuse recovery or treatment facilities, county social service offices, or other alcoholic beverage sales activity establishments.

Finding of Fact:The proposed Mikey’s Market with a new Alcoholic Beverage Control Type-21 (Off-Sale General: Beer, Wine, and Distilled Spirits) License is within a one-mile radius of a convenience store and less than 1000 feet from a sensitive land use which is basis for denial per Development Code Section 19.06.025 (Prohibited Uses) and Section 19.06-Article II (Conditional Use Permits for New Alcoholic Beverage Sales Activities)- Section III-(Locational Restrictions) (A) (2).

Finding No. 5:The proposed establishment will otherwise be compatible with existing and potential uses within the general area.

Finding of Fact:The proposed new Alcoholic Beverage Control Type-21 (Off-Sale General: Beer, Wine, and Distilled Spirits) License in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 would not satisfy the distancing requirements for convenience stores per Development Code requirements. Therefore, Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 would not be compatible with existing and potential land uses within the general area.

Finding No. 6:The proposed establishment is not located in what has been determined to be a high-crime area or where a disproportionate number of police service calls occur.

Finding of Fact:The Police Department has reviewed the application for the proposed new ABC Type-21 (Off-Sale General: Beer, Wine, and Distilled Spirits) License for the proposed project “Mikey’s Market”, and conducted an investigation based on the information provided and crime statistics within the surrounding area (Attachment E). However, the Police Department has not provided a recommendation of approval or denial.

Finding No. 7The use of the proposed establishment is consistent with the General Plan.

Finding of Fact:The subject property under Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 would not satisfy the distancing

Packet Pg.
407

Resolution No. 2023-060
Resolution No. 2023-060
June 7, 2023

Page 6 of 7 ends

locational requirements for convenience stores per Development Code requirements. Therefore, Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07 is not consistent with the requirements of the City’s General Plan per Section 19.06.025 (Prohibited Uses) and Section 19.06-Article II (Conditional Use Permits for New Alcoholic Beverage Sales Activities)-Section III-(Locational Restrictions) (A) (2).

SECTION 4.The documents and materials associated with this Resolution and that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at 290 North D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401. The City Clerk is the custodian of the record of proceedings.

SECTION 5.Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. The Mayor and City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 7th day of June, 2023
Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Genoveva Rocha, CMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney

Packet Pg.
408

Resolution No. 2023-060
Resolution No. 2023-060
June 7, 2023

Page 7 of 7 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2023-060, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 7 th day of June, 2023 by the following vote:

Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ ______ ______ _______ _______
IBARRA ______ ______ _______ _______
FIGUEROA ______ ______ _______ _______
SHORETT ______ ______ _______ _______
REYNOSO ______ ______ _______ _______
CALVIN ______ ______ _______ _______
ALEXANDER ______ ______ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of _________, 2023.
_____________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, City Clerk

Packet Pg.
409

Packet Pg.
410

Packet Pg.
411

Packet Pg.
412

Packet Pg.
413

Packet Pg.
414

Packet Pg.
415

Packet Pg.
416

Packet Pg.
417

Packet Pg.
418

Packet Pg.
419

Packet Pg.
420

Packet Pg.
421

Packet Pg.
422

Packet Pg.
423

Packet Pg.
424

Packet Pg.
425

Packet Pg.
426

Packet Pg.
427

Packet Pg.
428

Packet Pg.
429

Packet Pg.
430

Packet Pg.
431

Packet Pg.
432

Packet Pg.
433

Packet Pg.
434

Packet Pg.
435

Packet Pg.
436

Packet Pg.
437

Packet Pg.
438

Packet Pg.
439

Packet Pg.
440

Packet Pg.
441

Packet Pg.
442

Packet Pg.
443

Appeal 23-01 of Conditional Use Permit 21-18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07
Presented by: Mike Rosales, Associate Planner
Community, Housing, and Economic Development Department

Packet Pg.
444

Background
• Staff received a proposal for the development, establishment, and operation of Mikey’s Market with an Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 21 (Off-Sale General) license within a 2,024 SF existing building on a 0.45-acre parcel.
• The subject site is located at 1820 West 5th Street between N. Medical Center Drive and N. Rancho Avenue, within the Commercial General-1 (CG- 1) zone in Ward 1.
• January 2023: Planning Commission voted to adopt Resolution No. 2023- 002, denying a new Alcohol Beverage Control Type 21 License in conjunction with the proposed Mikey’s Market.

Packet Pg.
445

Aerial Map
Nunez Park
Ruben Campos
Community Center
Subject Site
West 5th Street

Packet Pg.
446

Location/Zoning Map

Packet Pg.
447

Denial Considerations
• Exceeds the 3 licenses allowed.
• Defined as Convenience Store.
• Proximity to Nunez Park and Ruben Campos Community
Center.
• Not Compatible.

Packet Pg.
448

Distancing: Rancho Ria Liquor

Packet Pg.
449

Distancing: West Side Liquor

Packet Pg.
450

Recommendation

1. Adopt a Resolution denying Appeal 23-01, thereby upholding the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 21- 18 and Public Convenience or Necessity Letter 21-07
The Mayor and City Council:

Packet Pg.
451

This space for filing stamp only

OR#:

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R

~ SINCE 1921 ~

600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841

PROOF OF PUBLICATION

(2015.5 C.C.P.)

State of California )
County
of Orange
) ss
Notice Type:

Ad Description:

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in
any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:

Executed on: 10/10/2004
At Riverside, California
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signature

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN
473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408
(909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536
SB 3702759
Jessica Nametz

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/DEVELOPMENT SER
300 NORTH D ST #300
SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92418

HRG - NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL MCC 6.7.23
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SAN BERNARDINO, county of SAN BERNARDINO, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, under date 06/27/1952, Case No. 73081. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
05/25/2023
05/25/2023

SAN BERNARDINO
!A000006320114!
Email

NO T ICE O F PUBLIC HEA RING

BEF ORE THE MAY OR AND

CITY COUN CIL
Not ice is he reby given that the City
of San Be rnard ino Mayor and City
Coun cil will hold a public hearing on
We dnesd ay, June 7, 2023 at 7:00
p.m. in the Feldheym P ublic
Libra ry, Bing Wong Auditorium , 555
W. 6 th Street, San Bernar dino,
California 92410 , on the following
item(s):

AP PEAL 23 -01 FOR
CON DIT IONAL U SE P ER MIT 21 -
18 AN D PUB LIC CONVE NIEN CE
OR N ECESS ITY LETTER 21 -07 - A
request to allow the develo pme nt,
establishment, and oper ation of a
mar ket wi th an Alcoholic Bev erag e
Control Type 21 (Off -Sale Genera l)
License within an existing bu ilding
conta ining appr oxim ately 2,024
square feet on a parcel containing
appro ximatel y 0.45 acr es. T he
project siteislocated at 1820 West 5 th
Street between N . Medic al Center
Drive and N. Rancho Avenue, Wa rd

1. En vironmental Deter min ation:

Statutorily E xem pt, purs uan t to
Section 15270 (Projects Which Are
Di sappr oved) of the State CEQA
Gu ideline s.

Applicant: Fern ando Castro
Ow ner: Z ho u Hu i
AP PEAL 23 -02 FOR
CON DIT IONAL U SE P ER MIT 22 -
12,AND MINOR E XCE PTION 22 -
04 -- - A reque st to allow the
dev elop ment of, establishm en t, an d
operation of a self -storage facility
comp rised of two (2)mult i -story
buildings containing a total of
appro ximatel y 109,000 square feet,
and appro ve a t en (10) perce nt
increase in building height from
thirty (30)feet to thirty (33)feet.

The project site is located at 15 34 W.

Hi gh land Aven ue (APN : 01 48 -1 74 -04,
10 , 11, and 1 5 throu gh 1 8),w ithin the
Commer cial General (CG -1) zone.

War d 6
En vironmental Det ermin ation:

Pursuant to Section 15270(a)of the
CEQA Guide lines, ‘‘ CE QA does no t
appl y to pro jects which a public
agen cy rejects or disapproves. ’’
Categorically Exem pt, pursuant to
Section 153 32(In -Fill Devel opme nt
Proj ects) of the State CEQA
Gu ideline s.

Ap plicant: SAF Stor R eal Estate Co,
LL C
Ow ner: Annabi, Wil liam N & Nellie
N Living Trust
The Mayor and City Council of the
City of San Bernardino w elcome s
you r par ticipation in eva luating
these items. The M ayor and City
Counc ilwill rev iew the proposal an d
wi ll consider the pro posed
env ironmental determ ination in

Packet Pg.
452

maki ng its decisions. The pub lic is
welco me to speak at the public
hea ring or to submit written
com m ents prior to the hearin g. For
more informa tion, please contac t
the City Clerk'sOffice by phone at
(909)384 -5002.

If you challenge the resultant action
of the Mayor and City Coun cil in
court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someo ne
else raised at the public h earin g
described in thisnotice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City
Plan ning Division at, or prior to,the
publ ic hearing.
5/25/23
SBS -3702759#

Packet Pg.
453

1 2
9 8

PUBLIC HEARING
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: June 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Charles E. McNeely, Interim City Manager
Mary E. Lanier, Interim Agency Director of Community,
Housing, and Economic Development Department
Department: Community, Housing, & Economic Development (CED) Subject: Appeal 23-02 for Conditional Use Permit 22-13 and Minor Exception 22-04 (Ward 6)
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-061, denying Appeal 23-02 thereby upholding Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 22-13 and Minor Exception 22-04 to allow the development, establishment, and operation of a self- storage facility comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and a ten (10) percent increase in the building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty-three (33) feet located at 1534 W. Highland Avenue (APN(s): 0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18), within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone (Attachment 1).

OR

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-079 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, granting Appeal 23-02 of the Planning Commission’s denial, thereby approving Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 to allow the development, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and a ten (10) percent increase in the building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty (33) feet located at 1534 W. Highland Avenue (APN(s):
0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18), within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone; and finding the project subject to a Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (Attachment 7).

Packet Pg.
454

1 2
9 8
Background
On January 10, 2023, the Planning Division of the Community and Economic Development Department recommended that the Planning Commission consider for approval a proposal for a Subdivision, Conditional Use Permit, and Minor Exception to allow for a self-storage facility at 1534 W. Highland Avenue, in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 19.66 (Subdivision Maps), Chapter 19.36 (Conditional Use Permits), and Chapter 19.58 (Minor Exceptions) of the of the City of San Bernardino Development Code (Attachment 3).

The Planning Commission considered the proposal for a Subdivision, Conditional Use Permit, and Minor Exception to allow for a self-storage facility at 1534 W. Highland Avenue. At the hearing, the Commissioners expressed the following concerns:
•The proposed land use will create a saturation of similar non-retail uses on a major commercial retail corridor;
•The proposed land use is not compatible with retail uses located on a major commercial retail corridor; and
•The proposed land use design and architecture is industrial in nature and not compatible with commercial retail uses located along a major commercial retail corridor.

Pursuant to Section 2.22.030 (Quorum and Vote Required) of the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code, five (5) members of the City Planning Commission shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Action granting approval of any matter, except General Plan amendments, and amendments to the Municipal Code, must be taken by a majority vote of commissioners in attendance, and a failure to do so results in an automatic denial of the pending matter. Out of seven (7) Commissioners present, the motion to approve only received three (3) votes, which is not a majority. As a result of the lack of a majority vote taken, the motion failed, and Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 thereby was denied.

Subsequently, in accordance with Section 19.52.100 (Filing of Appeals) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the applicant filed Application for Appeal 23-02 within the 15-day appeal period of the decision taken by the Planning Commission denying Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 (Attachment 5).

However, due to delays in the ratification of the Planning Commission’s decision taken on January 10, 2023, Application for Appeal 23-02 was deferred until the Resolution outlining the findings for denial could be adopted by the Planning Commission at a future hearing.

During the January 10, 2023, Planning Commission public hearing, the Planning Commission did not make any comments expressing opposition to Subdivision 22-08 but instead focused on its opposition to the proposed land use associated with Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04. Therefore, no findings could

Packet Pg.
455

1 2
9 8
be made to deny Subdivision 22-08 and Resolution No. 2023-012 was prepared for approval of Subdivision 22-08, while Resolution No. 2023-006 was revised to ratify the Planning Commission’s decision to deny Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04.

On March 14, 2023, the Planning Commission took two actions:

1. Adopted Resolution No. 2023-012 of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, approving Subdivision 22-08.

2. Adopted Resolution No. 2023-006 of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, denying Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04.

In adopting Resolution No. 2023-006, ratifying the denial for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04, the Planning Commission ratified the denial with a motion of six (6) to one (1) votes, carrying the latest motion (Attachment 4).

Subsequently, on April 4, 2023, the applicant submitted a letter revising Appeal 23-02 removing Subdivision 22-08 from the appeal while maintaining the appeal for the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 (Attachment 6).

Furthermore, Resolution No. 2023-0XX of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, granting Appeal 23-02 of the Planning Commission’s denial, thereby approving Conditional Use Permit 22-13 and Minor Exception 22-04 to allow the development, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and a ten (10) percent increase in the building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty-three (33) feet located at 1534 W. Highland Avenue (APN: 0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18), within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone, has been prepared for consideration of the Mayor and City Council.

Discussion
Appeal Grounds
On January 25, 2023, an Application for Appeal 23-02 was filed. The specific grounds for the appeal are summarized as follows:

1. The Project is consistent with the City’s Development Code and General Plan Goals and Policies and will be catalyst for future development projects.

2. SAFStor is investing in the community where there is demand for modern climate-controlled storage facilities that will set high standards for additional new development on Highland Avenue.

3. The Facility will be a modern, state-of-the-art development project that will foster additional development interest to the area.

Packet Pg.
456

1 2
9 8

4. SAFStor partners with the community to provide storage units to those in need.

Based on the information provided, the applicant is requesting that the Mayor and City Council uphold Appeal 23-02, thereby denying the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04, and allow the development, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and a ten (10) percent increase in the building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty-three (33) feet located at 1534 W. Highland Avenue (APN: 0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18), within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone.

Project Description/Analysis
The proposed self-storage facility, comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings, is consistent with the policies of the City’s General Plan and complies with the Development Standards of the City of San Bernardino Development Code for the Commercial General (CG-1) and uses. Per Section 19.06.020 (Commercial Zones – Development Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses) of the San Bernardino Development Code, self-storage facilities are permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.

Additionally, per section 19.58.030 (Minor Exceptions – Applicability) of the San Bernardino Development Code, a ten (10) percent exception may be allotted to allow for an increase in building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty-three (33). Section

19.06.030(1) (Commercial Zones – Development Standards) of the San Bernardino Development, the development of a new structure shall be a maximum of thirty (30) feet in height within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone. Proposed structure heights exceeding thirty (30) feet in height are subject to approval of a Minor Exception with appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination. The proposed project consists of the construction of two (2) thirty-three (33) foot structures to exceed the maximum permitted height of thirty (30) feet for the development of a self-storage facility.

Currently, there are existing easements on the property that create additional constraints on project design. Two (2) easements are for on-site sewer and water lines that service abutting properties to the north and east of the project site. One (1) easement provides access for an existing on-site telecommunications facility. Due to these additional constraints, the self-storage facility was designed to be comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings instead of one (1) building. Additionally, the proposed building heights were increased to up to three (3) feet in order to accommodate mechanical, electrical and plumbing equipment. Therefore, the additional three (3) feet is necessary in order to allow the property to enjoy improvements enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zone classification.

The project site will have two (2) points of access, with the main point of access from W. Highland Avenue and the secondary point of access from Cabrera Avenue. The

Packet Pg.
457

1 2
9 8
internal site circulation has been designed to adequately accommodate on-site vehicular circulation and access to off-street parking areas. The project will provide up to seventeen (17) parking spaces which include two (2) accessible parking spaces, and four (4) loading spaces.

Architecture
The proposed two (2) buildings will incorporate a modern contemporary design with an approximately 900 square foot internal management office and 800 individually partitioned self-storage units varying in size and accessed using interior pedestrian corridors and freight elevators. The exterior elevations will integrate a variation of finish materials which include veneer stone elements consisting of imperial stack graphite, ALPOLIC metal composites powder-coated blue, narrow and wide metal gray-colored panels, stucco gray finishes, and canopies and coping to match the gray and blue colors. Facade vertical breaks and pop-ups have been incorporated to screen roof mounted equipment and provide relief to the buildings’ mass.

Landscaping
The proposed project will provide new landscaped areas along W. Highland Avenue and Cabrera Avenue, and a decorative six (6) high block wall along the north and east side of the property. Additional landscape will be provided along the internal building areas and off-street parking. The landscape for the project will consist of various trees ranging in size, with 48-inch and 36-inch box size Velvet Ash and Pink Flowering Locust along Cabrera Avenue and frontage areas of W. Highland Avenue. In the internal off-street parking areas to include the two (2) proposed catch basins, there will be predominantly 24-inch box Chitalpa trees with mixture of 1-gallon and 5-gallon shrubs.

Operations
The proposed self-storage facility will be accessed 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week. The office will be open Monday through Friday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. The facility will incorporate security cameras at the loading areas and other key locations throughout the site with one (1) to two (2) employees per shift.

Traffic
The City's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed the proposed project scope study form for Levels of Service (LOS), and the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) assessment.

Based on the size of the project and number of trips generated, the Traffic Engineer has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the surrounding roadways or intersections.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Pursuant to Section 15270(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, “CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.” Therefore, based upon the action of the Planning Commission, CEQA does not apply to the denial of Appeal 23- 02 for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04. or
Pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of CEQA, a Class 32

Packet Pg.
458

1 2
9 8
Categorical Exemption consists of projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions contained within Section 15332 of CEQA. Section 15332 of CEQA applies to the approval of Appeal 23-02 for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 due to the fact that: 1) the project is consistent the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; 2) the proposed development is located within the City limits on less than five (5) acres; 3) Conditions of Approval will be imposed to alleviate potential impacts; and, 4) there are no additional potential significant environmental impacts that may result from the proposed development, establishment and operation of the proposed use.
2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
Appeal 23-02 for Conditional Use Permit 22-13 and Minor Exception 22-04 does not align with Key Strategic Goal 3. Improved Quality of Life. The proposed development will create a saturation of similar non-retail uses whose design and architecture is industrial in nature and not compatible with commercial retail uses located along a major commercial retail corridor. Therefore, the proposed development will not create a benefit to the surrounding businesses and residential neighborhood.

Fiscal Impact
There is no financial impact associated with the item.

Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-061, denying Appeal 23-02 thereby upholding Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 22-13 and Minor Exception 22-04 to allow the development, establishment, and operation of a self- storage facility comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and a ten (10) percent increase in the building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty-three (33) feet located at 1534 W. Highland Avenue (APN(s): 0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18), within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone (Attachment 1).

OR

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-079 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, granting Appeal 23-02 of the Planning Commission’s denial, thereby approving Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 to allow the development, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and a ten (10) percent increase in the building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty (33) feet located at 1534 W. Highland Avenue (APN(s):
0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18), within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone; and finding the project subject to a Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (Attachment 7).

Packet Pg.
459

1 2
9 8
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution No. 2023-061 (Denying Appeal 23-02) Attachment 2 Resolution No. 2023-061, Exhibit A – Plans Attachment 3 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-006 (Proposed Resolution)
Attachment 4 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-006 (Ratified Resolution)
Attachment 5 Application for Appeal 23-02, Dated January 25, 2023 Attachment 6 Revised Appeal 23-02 Letter, Dated April 4, 2023 Attachment 7 Resolution No. 2023-079 (Approving Appeal 23-02) Attachment 8 Resolution No. 2023-079, Exhibit A - Plans Attachment 9 Power Point
Attachment 10 Newspaper Publication
Ward:

Sixth Ward
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

On May 3, 2023, at the regularly scheduled Mayor and City Council meeting, the item was pulled from the agenda.

Packet Pg.
460

Resolution No. 2023-061
Resolution No. 2023-061
June 7, 2023

Page 1 of 9 ends

2 6
9 4
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-061

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
DENYING APPEAL 23-02 THEREBY UPHOLDING
PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT 22-13 AND MINOR EXCEPTION 22-04 TO

ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, AND

OPERATION OF A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY
COMPRISED OF TWO (2) MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS
CONTAINING A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY 109,000
SQUARE FEET, AND A TEN (10) PERCENT INCREASE IN
THE BUILDING HEIGHT FROM THIRTY (30) FEET TO
THIRTY (33) FEET LOCATED AT 1534 W. HIGHLAND
AVENUE (APN: 0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 THROUGH 18),
WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG-1) ZONE.

WHEREAS, on July 11, 2022, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.66 (Subdivision Maps), Chapter 19.36 (Conditional Use Permits), and Chapter 19.58 (Minor Exceptions) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, an application for Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 was duly submitted by:

Owner: Annabi William N & Nellie N LIV TR
1032 Marcheta Street
Altadena, CA 91001
Applicant: SAFStor Real Estate Co, LLC
355 Oneta Street, Suite D100
Athens, GA 30601
Property Address: 1534 W. Highland Avenue
APN: 0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18
Lot Area: 2.43 acres
WHEREAS, Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22- 04 is a request to allow the consolidation of seven (7) parcels into one (1) parcel (Tentative Parcel Map 20628) containing a total of approximately 2.43 acres to allow the development, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and approve a ten (10) percent increase in building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty (33) feet; and WHEREAS, the Planning Division of the Community and Economic Development Department has reviewed Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 for consistency with the City of San Bernardino General Plan, and compliance with the City of San Bernardino Development Code; and

Packet Pg.
461

Resolution No. 2023-061
Resolution No. 2023-061
June 7, 2023

Page 2 of 9 ends

2 6
9 4
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2023, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.52 (Hearings and Appeals) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 and at which meeting the Planning Commission considered Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2023, during said duly public hearing, after public testimony and deliberation among the Planning Commissioners, Commissioner Quiel made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2023-006 approving Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 based on the Findings of Fact presented, Commissioner Morales seconded the motion; and
WHEREAS, the motion failed by the following vote:

Ayes: Quiel, Morales, Guerrero
Nays: Lopez, Flores, Armstead, Lewis

Absent: Garcia
WHEREAS, at the January 10, 2023 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission listed various reasons for denying the project, including that the proposed land use will create a saturation of similar non-retail uses on a major commercial retail corridor, that the proposed land use is not compatible with retail uses located on a major commercial retail corridor, and that the proposed land use design and architecture is industrial in nature and not compatible with commercial retail uses located along a major commercial retail corridor; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 2023, pursuant to the requirements of Section 19.52.100 (Filing of Appeals) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the applicant submitted an application for Appeal No. 23-02 of the decision taken by the Planning Commission denying Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and WHEREAS, at the January 10, 2023 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission did not make any comments expressing opposition to the subdivision but instead focused its opposition on the proposed land use; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2023-012 was prepared for approval of Subdivision 22-08 since no findings could be made for denial, while Resolution No. 2023-006 was revised to ratify the Planning Commission’s decision to deny Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2023, the Planning Commission took two actions: 1) adopted Resolution No. 2023-012 of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, approving Subdivision 22-08, and 2) adopted Resolution No. 2023-006 of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, denying Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and

Packet Pg.
462

Resolution No. 2023-061
Resolution No. 2023-061
June 7, 2023

Page 3 of 9 ends

2 6
9 4
WHEREAS, on April 4, 2023, the applicant submitted a letter revising Appeal 23-02 removing Subdivision 22-08 from the appeal while maintaining the appeal for the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and WHEREAS, notice of the May 3, 2023 public hearing for the Mayor and City Council's consideration of the proposed Resolution for Appeal 23-02 for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 was published in The Sun newspaper on, April 8, 2023, and was mailed to owners of property and tenants located within 1,000 feet of the subject property of the holding of the public hearing in accordance with Chapter 19.52 (Hearings and Appeals) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code; and
WHEREAS, at the Mayor and City Council Meeting of May 3, 2023, the item was pulled from the agenda; and
WHEREAS, notice of the June 7, 2023 public hearing for the Mayor and City Council's consideration of the proposed Resolution for Appeal 23-02 for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 was published in The Sun newspaper on, May 27, 2023, and was mailed to owners of property and tenants located within 1,000 feet of the subject property of the holding of the public hearing in accordance with Chapter 19.52 (Hearings and Appeals) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.52 (Hearings and Appeals) and Chapter 19.36 (Conditional Use Permits) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Mayor and City Council has the authority to take action on Appeal 23-02 for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. As the decision- making body for the project, the Mayor and City Council have reviewed and considered the information contained in the administrative record for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04. Based upon the facts and information contained in the administrative record, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Mayor and City Council, the Mayor and City Council finds, as follows:
(1) The administrative record has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines;
(2) In accordance with Section 15270 (Projects Which are Disapproved) of the CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission has determined that consideration of Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 is exempt from CEQA due to the fact that the Planning Commission is denying Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and

Packet Pg.
463

Resolution No. 2023-061
Resolution No. 2023-061
June 7, 2023

Page 4 of 9 ends

2 6
9 4
(3) The determination of CEQA exemption reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission.

SECTION 3.Findings of Fact – Conditional Use Permit 22-12.

Finding No. 1:The proposed use is conditionally permitted within, and would not impair the integrity or character of, the subject land use district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code.

Finding of Fact:The proposed project is a conditionally permitted use, pursuant to Development Code Section 19.06.030(L)(14) and Section 19.06.030(2)(M).

The project site is located in the Commercial General (CG-1) zone and is substantially surrounded by existing commercial uses. The proposed development will comply with all applicable Development Code standards, such as parking landscaping, building setbacks and height, etc.

Furthermore, the development of the subject property will enhance the appearance of the currently underutilized property with the construction of the new commercial development with associated landscaping and on-site improvements. Although the development of the proposed self-storage facility complies with the development standards of the City’s Development Code, the development, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility would create a saturation of land use design and architecture that is industrial in nature and would not be harmonious or compatible to the General Plan area within this subject vicinity. The subject vicinity is not a commercial retail use located along a major commercial retail corridor. As such, allowing the development, establishment, and operation of a self- storage facility in the subject vicinity would hinder the establishment of economically sound community-serving regional retail outlets along a major commercial retail corridor. Therefore, the project would impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district and be detrimental to surrounding properties.

Finding No. 2:The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan.

Finding of Fact:General Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.2.1: Ensure compatibility between land uses and quality design through adherence to standards and regulations in the Development Code and policies and guidelines in the Community Design Element.

General Plan Land Use Element Goal 2.4: Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in San Bernardino by strategic in-fill of new development and revitalization of existing development.

General Plan Economic Development Element Policy: Maintain and enhance commercial regional cores and economically sound community- serving commercial concentrations by attracting new regional outlets,

Packet Pg.
464

Resolution No. 2023-061
Resolution No. 2023-061
June 7, 2023

Page 5 of 9 ends

2 6
9 4
maintaining the existing regional retail base, and stabilizing the future regional retail base.

The proposed project is a conditionally permitted use, pursuant to Development Code Section 19.06.030(L)(14) and Section 19.06.030(2)(M).

The project site is located in the Commercial General (CG-1) zone and is substantially surrounded by existing commercial uses. Although the proposed project is a conditionally permitted use within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone and is substantially surrounded by existing commercial uses, the development, establishment, and operation of a self- storage facility would not be compatible with retail uses located on a major commercial retail corridor since the land use design and architecture is industrial in nature and not compatible with the City’s westside gateway area. Additionally, the saturation of similar non-retail land uses along a major commercial corridor that is a gateway to the City’s westside area would hinder the establishment of economically sound community-serving regional retail outlets that would deprive the area of strategically in-filling sites with retail development. Therefore, the development, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility would not be compatible to the General Plan area within the subject vicinity as it is not a commercial retail use located along a major commercial retail corridor that would foster long- term retail economic growth.

Finding No. 3:Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use complies with the requirements of the CEQA and §19.20.030(6) of the Development Code.

Finding of Fact:As previously mentioned, in accordance with Section 15270 (Projects Which are Disapproved) of the CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission has determined that consideration of Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 is exempt from CEQA due to the fact that the Planning Commission is denying Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04.

Finding No. 4:There will be no potentially significant negative impacts on environmental quality or natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored.

Finding of Fact:The project site is located within an urbanized area and is surrounded by existing commercial development. Therefore, no significant negative impacts on the environment are anticipated to result from the proposed development.

Finding No. 5:The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the proposed use is to be located and will not create significant

Packet Pg.
465

Resolution No. 2023-061
Resolution No. 2023-061
June 7, 2023

Page 6 of 9 ends

2 6
9 4
noise, traffic, or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

Finding of Fact:Although, the proposed design is in compliance with the Development Code requirements that are applicable to location, height and setbacks for commercial development, provides two (2) points of access with the main point of access from W. Highland Avenue and the secondary point of access from Cabrera Avenue, and has internal site circulation to adequately accommodate on-site vehicular circulation and access to off-street parking areas, the proposed development, establishment, and operation of a self- storage facility at this location would not be harmonious or compatible with the land use district or General Plan area within this subject vicinity as it is not a commercial retail use located along a major commercial retail corridor.

Additionally, the land use design and architecture being industrial in nature will create a saturation of similar uses that would not provide economically sound community-serving regional retail outlets along a major commercial retail corridor.

Finding No. 6:The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed.

Finding of Fact:The site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being proposed as evidenced by project compliance with the applicable Development Code standards. The proposed building meets all setback and height requirements. The size of the project site is adequate to accommodate the proposed improvements, in compliance with the requirements of the Development Code.

Finding No. 7:There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health or safety.

Finding of Fact:The project site will have two (2) points of access with the main point of access from W. Highland Avenue and the secondary point of access from Cabrera Avenue. The internal site circulation has been designed to adequately accommodate on-site vehicular circulation and access to off- street parking areas. All agencies responsible for reviewing access and providing water, sanitation and other public services to the site have had the opportunity to review the proposal, and none indicated inability to serve the project site. Establishment of the proposed project, subject to Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental to public services or public health and safety.

SECTION 4.Findings of Fact – Minor Exception 22-04. Section 19.58.50 of the City of

Packet Pg.
466

Resolution No. 2023-061
Resolution No. 2023-061
June 7, 2023

Page 7 of 9 ends

2 6
9 4
San Bernardino Development Code requires that Minor Exception applications meet certain findings prior to approval. Conditional Use Permit 22-12 was filed in conjunction with Minor Exception 22-04. Since the Conditional Use Permit 22-12 for the development, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility would create a saturation of land use design and architecture that is industrial in nature and would not be harmonious or compatible to the General Plan area within this subject vicinity for the reasons stated herein above in Section 3, Minor Exception 22- 04, being contingent on the approval of Conditional Use Permit 22-12, is now moot. Accordingly, the consideration of Minor Exception 22-04’s meeting the following findings is a moot exercise.

Finding No. 1That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, the strict application of this Development Code deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zone classification.

Finding No. 2That granting the Minor Exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied to the property for which the Minor Exception is sought.

Finding No. 3That granting the Minor Exception will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.

Finding No. 4That granting the Minor Exception does not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located.

Finding No. 5That granting the Minor Exception does not exceed 10% of the standard(s) being modified, or allow a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the regulations governing the subject parcel.

Finding No. 6That granting the Minor Exception will not be inconsistent with the General Plan.

SECTION 5. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. The Mayor and City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Packet Pg.
467

Resolution No. 2023-061
Resolution No. 2023-061
June 7, 2023

Page 8 of 9 ends

2 6
9 4
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 7th day of June, 2023.

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Genoveva Rocha, CMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney

Packet Pg.
468

Resolution No. 2023-061
Resolution No. 2023-061
June 7, 2023

Page 9 of 9 ends

2 6
9 4

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2023-061, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 7 th day of June 2023 by the following vote:

Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT

SANCHEZ
IBARRA

FIGUEROA

SHORETT

REYNOSO
CALVIN

ALEXANDER
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this __ day of ___ 2023.

Genoveva Rocha, CMC, City Clerk

Packet Pg.
469

Δ

W HIGHLAND AVE

CABRERA AVE
X
PROP.BASIN

PROPOSED
BLDG 1
FF 1216.00

PROPOSED
BLDG 2FF 1213.70
PROP.BASIN

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
660 S FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 2050, LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 PHONE: 213-261-4040
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
© 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

LEGEND

PAVEMENT LEGEND

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
NORTH
NORTH

PROJECT TEAM

SITE INFORMATION

LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASEMENT NOTES
WALL TYPE GENERAL NOTES:GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES: TOTAL SF 108,972 WEST BUILDING SF 54,645
EAST BUILDING SF54,327
78,733 SF/108,972 = 72.3%
COUNT

OVERALL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
85 2
62 236
67 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
2125
140
4650
23600
13400
03%
06%
30%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 27X12 168 <01%
TOTAL: 80678733100%
23 10X30 6900 09%9
216 5X10 10800 14%
113 10X15 16950721%
COUNT

FIRST LEVEL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
12 -
10 17
15 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
300
-
750
1700
3000
02%
-
05%
13%
23%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 -7X12 - -
TOTAL: 11613300100%
910X30270020% 9
31 5X10 1550 12%
2210X15 3300 725%
<01%

EAST BUILDING
AREA PER 1ST LEVEL SF 18,109
COUNT

EAST BUILDING - UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
54 -
31 106
33 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
1350
-
2325
10600
6600
03%
-
06%
27%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
-7X12 -
TOTAL: 41539675100%
910X30 270007% 9
1125X10 5600 14%
70 10X15 1050026%
-
FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EAST BUILDING11/8" = 1'-0"

KEY PLAN
8 7
CHECKED:

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

REVISIONS

NO DATE REMARKS
DRAWN:

SEAL:

SAFSTOR
1534 WEST HIGHLAND AVE.

SAN BERNARDINO, CA
2021.1185
DAVID BOYCE RESERVES COPYRIGHT & OTHER RIGHTS RESTRICTING THESE DOCUMENTS TO THE ORIGINAL SITE OR PURPOSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED. REPRODUCTIONS, CHANGES OR ASSIGNMENTS ARE PROHIBITED.

DAVID BOYCE

ARCHITECT
220 E. CENTRAL PKWY, STE 4000
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32701
407.645.5008

THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT

FOR REGULATORY

APPROVAL, PERMITTING,
OR CONSTRUCTION.

07.11.2022
A-1.01

FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
KW TG
P:\S\SafStor\2021.1185 - SAFStor West Highland Ave., San Bernardino, CA\3 CAD & Drawings\2 Construction Documents\CD East Building\2021.1185_A-1.01 First Level Floor Plan - East Building.dwg, A-1.01 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, 7/12/2022 11:08:54 AM, kevwat, DWG To PDF.pc3, ARCH E1 (30.00 x 42.00 Inches), 1:1 WALL TYPE GENERAL NOTES:GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES:

SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EAST BUILDING11/8" = 1'-0"
TOTAL SF 108,972
WEST BUILDING SF 54,645
EAST BUILDING SF54,327
78,733 SF/108,972 = 72.3%
COUNT

OVERALL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
85 2
62 236
67 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
2125
140
4650
23600
13400
03%
06%
30%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 27X12 168 <01%
TOTAL: 80678733100%
23 10X30 6900 09%9
216 5X10 10800 14%
113 10X15 16950721%
COUNT

SECOND LEVEL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
26 -
10 40
9 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
650
-
750
4000
1800
05%
-
06%
30%
13%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 -7X12 - -
TOTAL: 14513400100%
-10X30-- 9
28 5X10 1400 10%
32 10X154800 736%
<01%

EAST BUILDING
AREA PER 2ND LEVEL SF 18,109
COUNT

EAST BUILDING - UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
54 -
31 106
33 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
1350
-
2325
10600
6600
03%
-
06%
27%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 -7X12 -
TOTAL: 41539675100%
910X30 270007% 9
1125X10 5600 14%
70 10X15 10500726%
-

KEY PLAN
CHECKED:

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

REVISIONS

NO DATE REMARKS
DRAWN:

SEAL:

SAFSTOR
1534 WEST HIGHLAND AVE.

SAN BERNARDINO, CA
2021.1185
DAVID BOYCE RESERVES COPYRIGHT & OTHER RIGHTS RESTRICTING THESE DOCUMENTS TO THE ORIGINAL SITE OR PURPOSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED. REPRODUCTIONS, CHANGES OR ASSIGNMENTS ARE PROHIBITED.

DAVID BOYCE

ARCHITECT
220 E. CENTRAL PKWY, STE 4000
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32701
407.645.5008

THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT

FOR REGULATORY

APPROVAL, PERMITTING,
OR CONSTRUCTION.

07.11.2022
A-1.02

SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
KW TG
P:\S\SafStor\2021.1185 - SAFStor West Highland Ave., San Bernardino, CA\3 CAD & Drawings\2 Construction Documents\CD East Building\2021.1185_A-1.02 Second Level Floor Plan - East Building.dwg, A-1.02 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, 7/12/2022 11:09:50 AM, kevwat, DWG To PDF.pc3, ARCH E1 (30.00 x 42.00 Inches), 1:1 WALL TYPE GENERAL NOTES:GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES:

THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EAST BUILDING11/8" = 1'-0"
TOTAL SF 108,972
WEST BUILDING SF 54,645
EAST BUILDING SF54,327
78,733 SF/108,972 = 72.3%
COUNT

OVERALL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
85 2
62 236
67 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
2125
140
4650
23600
13400
03%
06%
30%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 27X12 168 <01%
TOTAL: 80678733100%
23 10X30 6900 09%9
216 5X10 10800 14%
113 10X15 16950721%
COUNT

THIRD LEVEL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
16 -
11 49
9 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
400
-
825
4900
1800
03%
-
07%
38%
14%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 -7X12 - -
TOTAL: 15412975100%
-10X30-- 9
53 5X10 2650 20%
16 10X152400 618%
<01%

EAST BUILDING
AREA PER 3RD LEVEL SF 18,109
COUNT

EAST BUILDING - UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
54 -
31 106
33 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
1350
-
2325
10600
6600
03%
-
06%
27%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 -7X12 -
TOTAL: 41539675100%
910X30 270007% 9
1125X10 5600 14%
70 10X15 10500626%
-

KEY PLAN
CHECKED:

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

REVISIONS

NO DATE REMARKS
DRAWN:

SEAL:

SAFSTOR
1534 WEST HIGHLAND AVE.

SAN BERNARDINO, CA
2021.1185
DAVID BOYCE RESERVES COPYRIGHT & OTHER RIGHTS RESTRICTING THESE DOCUMENTS TO THE ORIGINAL SITE OR PURPOSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED. REPRODUCTIONS, CHANGES OR ASSIGNMENTS ARE PROHIBITED.

DAVID BOYCE

ARCHITECT
220 E. CENTRAL PKWY, STE 4000
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32701
407.645.5008

THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT

FOR REGULATORY

APPROVAL, PERMITTING,
OR CONSTRUCTION.

07.11.2022
A-1.03

THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
KW TG
P:\S\SafStor\2021.1185 - SAFStor West Highland Ave., San Bernardino, CA\3 CAD & Drawings\2 Construction Documents\CD East Building\2021.1185_A-1.03 Third Level Floor Plan - East Building.dwg, A-1.03 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, 7/12/2022 11:10:46 AM, kevwat, DWG To PDF.pc3, ARCH E1 (30.00 x 42.00 Inches), 1:1 WALL TYPE GENERAL NOTES:GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES:

FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - WEST BUILDING11/8" = 1'-0"
TOTAL SF 108,972
WEST BUILDING SF 54,645
EAST BUILDING SF54,327
OFFICE / LOBBY SF 909
78,733 SF/108,972 = 72.3%
COUNT

OVERALL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
85 2
62 236
67 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
2125
140
4650
23600
13400
03%
06%
30%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 27X12 168 <01%
TOTAL: 80678733100%
23 10X30 6900 09%9
216 5X10 10800 14%
113 10X15 16950721%
COUNT

FIRST LEVEL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
4 -
6 37
14 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
100
-
450
3700
2800
01%
-
04%
29%
22%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 -7X12 - -
TOTAL: 10212700100%
1410X30 420033% 9
26 5X10 1300 10%
110X15 150 701%
<01%

WEST BUILDING
AREA PER 1ST LEVEL SF 18,215
COUNT

WEST BUILDING - UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
31 2
31 130
34 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
775
140
2325
13000
6800
02%
<01%
07%
33%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 27X12 168
TOTAL: 39139058100%
1410X30 420011% 9
104 5X10 5200 13%
43 10X15 645017%
<01%
8 KEY PLAN
CHECKED:

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

REVISIONS

NO DATE REMARKS
DRAWN:

SEAL:

SAFSTOR
1534 WEST HIGHLAND AVE.

SAN BERNARDINO, CA
2021.1185
DAVID BOYCE RESERVES COPYRIGHT & OTHER RIGHTS RESTRICTING THESE DOCUMENTS TO THE ORIGINAL SITE OR PURPOSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED. REPRODUCTIONS, CHANGES OR ASSIGNMENTS ARE PROHIBITED.

DAVID BOYCE

ARCHITECT
220 E. CENTRAL PKWY, STE 4000
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32701
407.645.5008

THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT

FOR REGULATORY

APPROVAL, PERMITTING,
OR CONSTRUCTION.

07.08.2022
A-1.01

FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
KW TG
P:\S\SafStor\2021.1185 - SAFStor West Highland Ave., San Bernardino, CA\3 CAD & Drawings\2 Construction Documents\CD West Building\2021.1185_A-1.01 First Level Floor Plan - West Building.dwg, A-1.01 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, 7/12/2022 11:29:51 AM, kevwat, DWG To PDF.pc3, ARCH E1 (30.00 x 42.00 Inches), 1:1 WALL TYPE GENERAL NOTES:GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES:

SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - WEST BUILDING11/8" = 1'-0"
TOTAL SF 108,972
WEST BUILDING SF 54,645
EAST BUILDING SF54,327
78,733 SF/108,972 = 72.3%
COUNT

OVERALL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
85 2
62 236
67 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
2125
140
4650
23600
13400
03%
06%
30%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 27X12 168 <01%
TOTAL: 80678733100%
23 10X30 6900 09%9
216 5X10 10800 14%
113 10X15 16950721%
COUNT

SECOND LEVEL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
16 1
18 43
10 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
400
70 1350
4300
2000
03%
01%
10%
32%
15%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 17X12 84
TOTAL: 14613154100%
-10X30 -- 9
36 5X10 1800 14%
2110X15 3150 724%
<01%

WEST BUILDING
AREA PER 2ND LEVEL SF 18,215
01%
COUNT

WEST BUILDING - UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
31 2
31 130
34 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
775
140
2325
13000
6800
02%
<01%
07%
33%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 27X12 168
TOTAL: 39139058100%
1410X30 420011% 9
104 5X10 5200 13%
43 10X15 6450717%
<01%

KEY PLAN
CHECKED:

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

REVISIONS

NO DATE REMARKS
DRAWN:

SEAL:

SAFSTOR
1534 WEST HIGHLAND AVE.

SAN BERNARDINO, CA
2021.1185
DAVID BOYCE RESERVES COPYRIGHT & OTHER RIGHTS RESTRICTING THESE DOCUMENTS TO THE ORIGINAL SITE OR PURPOSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED. REPRODUCTIONS, CHANGES OR ASSIGNMENTS ARE PROHIBITED.

DAVID BOYCE

ARCHITECT
220 E. CENTRAL PKWY, STE 4000
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32701
407.645.5008

THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT

FOR REGULATORY

APPROVAL, PERMITTING,
OR CONSTRUCTION.

07.08.2022
A-1.02

SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
KW TG
P:\S\SafStor\2021.1185 - SAFStor West Highland Ave., San Bernardino, CA\3 CAD & Drawings\2 Construction Documents\CD West Building\2021.1185_A-1.02 Second Level Floor Plan - West Building.dwg, A-1.02 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, 7/12/2022 11:32:45 AM, kevwat, DWG To PDF.pc3, ARCH E1 (30.00 x 42.00 Inches), 1:1 WALL TYPE GENERAL NOTES:GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES:

THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - WEST BUILDING11/8" = 1'-0"
TOTAL SF 108,972
WEST BUILDING SF 54,645
EAST BUILDING SF54,327
78,733 SF/108,972 = 72.3%
COUNT

OVERALL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
85 2
62 236
67 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
2125
140
4650
23600
13400
03%
06%
30%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 27X12 168 <01%
TOTAL: 80678733100%
23 10X30 6900 09%9
216 5X10 10800 14%
113 10X15 16950721%
COUNT

THIRD LEVEL UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
11 1
7 50
10 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
275
70 525
5000
2000
02%
<01%
04%
38%
15%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 17X12 84
TOTAL: 14313204100%
-10X30 -- 9
425X10 2100 16%
2110X15 3150 724%
<01%

WEST BUILDING
AREA PER 3RD LEVEL SF 18,215
01%
COUNT

WEST BUILDING - UNIT MIX SCHEDULE

UNIT TYPERENTABLE

AREAPERCENT
31 2
31 130
34 5X5
7X10

7.5X10
10X10
10X20
775
140
2325
13000
6800
02%
<01%
07%
33%
17%
UNIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 27X12 168
TOTAL: 39139058100%
1410X30 420011% 9
104 5X10 5200 13%
43 10X15 6450717%
<01%

KEY PLAN
CHECKED:

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

REVISIONS

NO DATE REMARKS
DRAWN:

SEAL:

SAFSTOR
1534 WEST HIGHLAND AVE.

SAN BERNARDINO, CA
2021.1185
DAVID BOYCE RESERVES COPYRIGHT & OTHER RIGHTS RESTRICTING THESE DOCUMENTS TO THE ORIGINAL SITE OR PURPOSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED. REPRODUCTIONS, CHANGES OR ASSIGNMENTS ARE PROHIBITED.

DAVID BOYCE

ARCHITECT
220 E. CENTRAL PKWY, STE 4000
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32701
407.645.5008

THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT

FOR REGULATORY

APPROVAL, PERMITTING,
OR CONSTRUCTION.

07.08.2022
A-1.03

THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
KW TG
P:\S\SafStor\2021.1185 - SAFStor West Highland Ave., San Bernardino, CA\3 CAD & Drawings\2 Construction Documents\CD West Building\2021.1185_A-1.03 Third Level Floor Plan - West Building.dwg, A-1.03 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, 7/12/2022 11:34:34 AM, kevwat, DWG To PDF.pc3, ARCH E1 (30.00 x 42.00 Inches), 1:1

X

PROPOSED
BLDG 1
FF 1216.00
PROP.BASIN

W HIGHLAND AVE

CABRERA AVE
PROP.BASIN

PROPOSED
BLDG 2FF 1213.70

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
660 S FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 2050, LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 PHONE: 213-261-4040
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
© 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

EXISTING UTILITY NOTE
NORTH
LEGEND

ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES

EASEMENT NOTES
·
·
·

GRADING NOTES

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
660 S FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 2050, LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 PHONE: 213-261-4040
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
© 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1 GRADING DETAIL
NORTH
2 GRADING DETAIL
NORTH
3 GRADING DETAIL
NORTH

CABRERA AVE W HIGHLAND AVE

W HIGHLAND AVE

CABRERA AVE
101
1215.468
101 CTRL SCRIBE X
102
1215.473
102 CTRL SCRIBE X
103
1215.770
103 1IN IP TT SBCITY
105
1217.570
105 CTRL SCRIBE X
SCALE 1" = 60 15 30 30'
N
S
E W
X:\Projects\2021\210688 - SAFStor West Highland - San Bernardino, CA\Design\Construction\Landscape\SAFStor Highland Landscape - 210688.dwg 9-15-22 11:03:26 AM pargo

REVISIONS
DATE:

COMMENTDATE
A
468101214161820222426283032
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
2 ALL DRAWINGS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF W&A ENGINEERING.THESE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE TO BE USED SOLELY FOR THISSPECIFIC PROJECT. W&A ENGINEERING SHALL RETAIN ALL LEGALRIGHTS TO THE USE OF THE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALLRETAIN FULL PROTECTION UNDER UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW.

PRELIMINARY

LANDSCAPE PLAN
L201
210688
CUP Submittal
6/29/2022
9/14/2022CUP SUBMITTAL COMMENTS
..
..
..
..
..
..
..

SAFStor HIGHLAND

SAN BERNARDINO,CA
W. HIGHLAND AVENUE - +/-2.47 ACRES

PLANTBSCHEDULE
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING SUBDIVISION 22 -08, CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 22-12 AND MINOR EXCEPTION 22-04 ALLOWING
THE CONSOLIDATION OF SEVEN (7) PARCELS INTO
ONE (1) PARCEL (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 20628)
CONTAINING A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY 2.43

ACRES TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF,

ESTABLISHMENT, AND OPERATION OF A SELF -
STORAGE FACILITY COMPRISED OF TWO (2) MULTI -

STORY BUILDINGS CONTAINING A TOTAL OF
APPROXIMATELY 109,000 SQUARE FEET, AND
APPROVE A TEN (10) PERCENT INCREASE IN
BUILDING HEIGHT FROM THIRTY (30) FEET TO
THIRTY (33) FEET LOCATED AT 1534 W. HIGHLAND
AVENUE; AND, FINDING THE PROJECT SUBJECT TO A

CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.

WHEREAS, on July 11, 2022, pursuant to the requirements of pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.66 (Subdivision Maps), Chapter 19.36 (Conditional Use Permits), and Chapter

19.58 (Minor Exceptions) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, an application for Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 was duly submitted by:

Owner: Annabi William N & Nellie N LIV TR
1032 Marcheta Street
Altadena, CA 91001

Applicant: SAFStor Real Estate Co, LLC
355 Oneta Street, Suite D100
Anthens, GA 30601

Property Address: 1534 W. Highland Avenue
APN: 0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18
Lot Area: 2.43 acres

WHEREAS, Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22- 12 and Minor Exception 22- 04 is a request to allow the consolidation of seven (7) parcels into one (1) parcel (Tentative Parcel Map 20628) containing a total of approximately 2.43 acres to allow the development of, establishment, and operation of a self -storage facility comprised of two (2) multi- story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and approve a ten (10) percent increase in building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty (33) feet;

Packet Pg.
482

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
2 WHEREAS, the Planning Division of the Community and Economic Development Department has reviewed Subdivision 22- 08, Conditional Use Permit 22- 12 and Minor Exception 22-04 for consistency with the City of San Bernardino General Plan, and compliance with the City of San Bernardino Development Code;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the Planning Division of the Community and Economic Development Department has evaluated Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22- 12 and Minor Exception 22-04 and determined that it is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Categorical Exemption (listed in CEQA Guidelines Article 19, commencing with Section 15300) and the application of that Categorical Exemption is not barred by one of the exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2;

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2022, pursuant to the requirements of Section 19.44.030 (Project Review) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application and moved Subdivi sion 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22- 12 and Minor Exception 22-04 to the Planning Commission for consideration;

WHEREAS, on December 22, 2022, pursuant to the requirements of S ection 19.52.020 (Hearings and Appeals – Application Processing) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the City gave public notice by advertising in the San Bernardino Sun, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of San Bernardino, and by mailing notices to the owners of property and tenants located within 1,000 feet of the subject property of the holding of a public hearing at which Subdivision 22- 08, Conditional Use Permit 22- 12 and Minor Exception 22-04 would be considered;

WHEREAS, on January 10, 2023, pursuant to the requirements of S ection 19.52.040 (Hearings and Appeals – Hearing Procedures) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Planning Commission held the duly- noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to, Subdivision 22 -08, Conditional Use Permit 22 -12 and Minor Exception 22-04 and at which meeting the Planning Commission considered Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.66 (Subdivision Maps), Chapter

19.36 (Conditional Use Permits), and Chapter 19.58 (Minor Exceptions) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Planning Commission has the authority to take action on Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04.

NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino does hereby resolve, determine, find, and order as follows:

SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

As the decision -making body for the project, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered t he information contained in the administrative record for Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04. Based upon the facts and information

Packet Pg.
483

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
3 contained in the administrative record, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission finds, as follows:

(1) The administrative record has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, and

(2) The proposed project is categori cally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15332 ( In-Fill Development Projects ) of the CEQA Guidelines; and

(3) The application of the categorical exemption is not barred by one of the exceptions set forth in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2; and

(4) The determination of CEQA exemption reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission.

SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR SUBDIVISION 22-08 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 20628)

Section 19.66.150 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code requires that Subdivision applications meet certain findings prior to their approval by the Planning Commission.

Accordingly, the following findings are provided in support of the approval of Subdivision 22-08 (Tentative Tract Map 20628):

Finding No. 1: The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan.

Finding of Fact: The proposed subdivision is located in an area designated for commercial uses. The project proposes to consolidate seven (7) parcels into one (1) parcel for Tentative Parcel Map 20628 containing a total of approximately

2.43 acres for the purpose of constructing a commercial devel opment.

Therefore, the map is consistent with the General Plan.

Finding No. 2: The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan.

Finding of Fact: General Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.2.1: Ensure compatibility between land uses and quality design through adherence to standards and regulations in the Development Code and policies and guidelines in the Community Design Element.

General Plan Land Use Element Goal 2.4: Enhance the quality of life and economic vita lity in San Bernardino by strategic in- fill of new development and revitalization of existing development.

General Plan Community Design Element Goal 5.4: Ensure individual projects are well designed and maintained.

Packet Pg.
484

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
4 General Plan Circulation Element Policy 6.9.1: Ensure that developments provide an adequate supply of parking to meet its needs either on- site or within close proximity.

The proposed project will consolidate seven (7) parcels into one (1) parcel for Tentative Parcel Map 20628 containing a total of approximately 2.43 acres for the purpose of constructing a commercial development that is consistent with the provisions of the Development Code to include minimum lot size. The proposed tentative parcel map will connect to existing water and sewer services, roads, storm drains, and private utilities.

Additionally, through this proposal the existing property will be transformed from an underutilized property into a development that meets the City’s land use and community design goals, while satisfying the Development Code requirements; and will be adequately regulated through the Conditions of Approval.

Finding No. 3: The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

Finding of Fact: The General Plan Land Use District and Zoning Designation in which the project site is located allow for commercial uses. The proposed consolidation seven (7) parcels into one (1) parcel for Tentative Parcel Map 20628 containing a total of approximately 2.43 acres , has been designed to adequately accommodate the needs of the proposed commercial lot and subsequently the commercial development.

Finding No. 4: The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

Finding of Fact: The project proposes a density that is less than what the General Plan Land Use Designation or Zoning District allow and will be physically suitable for the proposed density.

Finding No. 5: The des ign of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

Finding of Fact: In accordance with §15060 (Preliminary Review) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Division conducted an environmental evaluation in connection with proposed Subdivision 22-08 and concluded that Subdivision 22-08 is found to be exempt under Section 15061(b)(2) (Review for Exemption) of CEQA. Pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of CEQA, a Class 32 Categorical Exemption consists of projects characterized as in -fill development meeting the conditions contained within Section 15332 of CEQA . The design of the subdivision will not have any significant negative impacts to wildlife or their habitat, and no sensitive or protected species have been identified on the site. The subject property is located surrounded by existing commercial and residential development and has no significant negative impacts on the environment are anticipated to result from

Packet Pg.
485

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
5 development of the site. Furthermore, Conditions of Approval will be imposed to alleviate potential impacts and there are no additional potential significant environmental impacts that may result from the proposed development and establishment of the proposed project.

Finding No. 6: The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems.

Finding of Fact: The design of the proposed subdivision meets all of the applicable Development Code requirements and will not result in any serious public health problems. Existing utilities and public services are available to serve the project site and ensure the maintenance of publ ic health and safety.

Finding No. 7: The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

Finding of Fact: The design of the subdivision will not conflict with any public or private easements. All documentation relating to easements and dedications will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to recordation of the Final Map. Existing easements will b e reserved in place or relocated, as necessary.

SECTION 3. FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 22-12:

Section 19.36.050 (Findings) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code requires that Conditional Use Permit applications meet certain findings prior to their approval by the Planning Commission. Accordingly, the following findings are provided in support of the recommendation by the Planning Commission for the approval of Conditional Use Permit 22-12:

Finding No. 1: The proposed use is conditionally permitted within, and would not impair the integrity or character of, the subject land use district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code.

Finding of Fact: The proposed project is a conditionally permitted use, pursuant to Development Code Section 19.06.030(L)(14). The project site is located in the Commercial General (CG -1) zone and is substant ially surrounded by existing commercial uses. The proposed development will comply with all applicable Development Code standards, such as parking landscaping, building setbacks and height, etc . Further, the development of the subject property will enhance the appearance of the currently underutilized property with the construction of the new commercial development with associated landscaping and on- site improvements. Therefore, the project would not impair the integrity and character of the subject land us e district or be detrimental to surrounding properties.

Packet Pg.
486

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
6 Finding No. 2: The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan.

Finding of Fact: General Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.2.1: Ensure compatibility between land uses and quality design through adherence to standards and regulations in the Development Code and policies and guidelines in the Community Design Element.

General Plan Land Use Element Goal 2.4: Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in San Bernardino by strategic in- fill of new development and revitalization of existing development.

General Plan Community Design Element Goal 5.4: Ensure individual projects are well designed and maintained.

General Plan Circulation Element Policy 6.9.1: Ensure that developments provide an adequate supply of parking to meet its needs either on-site or within close proximity.

The proposed project implements the above General Plan goals and policies in that the proposed development has been designed with quality architectural treatments. Development of the site will be done in a manner that will enhance the physical and visual qualities of the subject property with significant landscaping, thereby enhancing the aesthetics of the area.

Additionally, through this proposal the existing property will be transformed from an underutilized property into a development that meets the City’s development goals, while satisfying the Development Code requirements, and will be adequately regulated through the Conditions of Approval in order to minimize potential impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would be compatible with surrounding land uses and consistent with the General Plan.

Finding No. 3: Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use complies with the requirements of the CEQA and §19.20.030(6) of the Development Code.

Finding of Fact: In accordance with §15060 (Preliminary Review) of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA), the Planning Division conducted an environmental evaluation in connection with proposed Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and concluded that Conditional Use Permit 22-12 is found to be exempt under Section 15061(b)(2) (Review for Exemption) of CEQA.

Pursuant to Section 15332 (In- Fill Development Projects) of CEQA, a Class 32 Categorical Exemption consists of projects characterized as in - fill development meeting the conditions contained within Section 15332 of CEQA. The design of the subdivision will not have any significant negative impacts to wildlife or their habitat, and no sensitive or protected species have been identified on the site. The subject property is located surrounded by existing commercial and residential development and has no significant negative impacts on the environment are anticipated to

Packet Pg.
487

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
7 result from development of the site. Furthermore, Conditions of Approval will be imposed to alleviate potential impacts and there are no additional potential significant environmental impacts that may result from the proposed development and establishment of the proposed project.

Finding No. 4: There will be no potentially significant negative impacts on environmental quality or natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored.

Finding of Fact: The project site is located within an urbanized area and is surrounded by existing commercial development . Therefore, no s ignificant negative impacts on the environment are anticipated to result from the proposed development.

Finding No. 5: The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the proposed use is to be located and will not create significant noise, traffic, or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

Finding of Fact: The proposed design is in compliance with the Development Code requirements that are applicable to location, height and setbacks for commercial development. The project site will have two (2) points of access with the main point of access from W. Highland Avenue and the secondary point of access from Cabrera Avenue. The internal site circulation has been designed to adequately accommodate on- site vehicular circulation and access to off -street parking areas . Therefore, the design of the project will ensure t hat the project will not create any significant noise, traffic, or other conditions that would be detrimental or objectionable to other uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

Finding No. 6: The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed.

Finding of Fact: The site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being proposed as evidenced by project compliance with the applicable Development Code s tandards. The proposed building meets all setback and height requirements. The size of the project site is adequate to accommodate the proposed improvements, in compliance with the requirements of the Development Code.

Finding No. 7: There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health or safety.

Packet Pg.
488

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
8 Finding of Fact: The project site will have two (2) points of access with the main point of access from W. Highland Avenue and the secondary point of acces s from Cabrera Avenue. The internal site circulation has been designed to adequately accommodate on -site vehicular circulation and access to off - street parking areas . All agencies responsible for reviewing access and providing water, sanitation and other public services to the site have had the opportunity to review the proposal, and none indicated inability to serve the project site. Establishment of the proposed project, subject to Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental to public services or public health and safety.

SECTION 4. FINDINGS FOR MINOR EXCEPTION 22-04:

Section 19.58.50 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code requires that Minor Exception applications meet certain findings prior to the approval by the Agency Director of Community, Housing, and Economic Development. Accordingly, the following findings are provided in support of the approval by the Community Development Di rector for Minor Exception 22-04:

Finding No. 1 That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, the strict application of this Development Code deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zone classification.

Finding of Fact Pursuant to Section 19.06.030(1) (Commercial Zones – Development Standards) of the San Bernardino Development, the development of a new structure shall be a maximum of thirty (30) feet in height within the Commercial General (CG -1) zone. Proposed structure heights exceeding thirty (30) feet in height are subject to approval of a Minor Exception with appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination. The proposed project consists of the construction two (2) thirty -three (33) foot structures to exceed the maximum permitted height of thirty (30) feet for the development of a self-storage facility.

Currently, there are existing easements on the property that create additional constrains on project design. Two (2) easements are for on- site sewer and water lines that service abutting properties to the north and east of the project site. One (1) easement provides access for an existing on- site telecommunications facility. Due to these additional constrains the self-storage facility was developed to be comprised of two (2) multi -story buildings instead of one (1) building. Additionally, the proposed building heights increased to up to three (3) feet in order to accommodate mechanical, electrical and plumbing equipment. Therefore, the additional three (3) feet where necessary in order to allow the property to enjoy improvements enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zone classification.

Packet Pg.
489

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
9 Finding No. 2 That granting the Minor Exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied to the property for which the Minor Exception is sought.

Finding of Fact The proposed project site has existing easements on the property that create additional constrains on project design. Two (2) easements are for on- site sewer and water lines that service abutting properties to the north and east of the project site. One (1) easement provides access for an existing on -site telecommunications facility. Granting the requested Minor Exception would allow the applicant to form a structurally design development comprised of two (2) multi- story buildings instead of one (1) bu ilding. The current development standard would limit the structure height to thirty (30) feet, which would impede the development of a comprehensive and cost -effective new in -fill project.

Therefore, the proposed increase in the structure height will allow the applicant to an improvement to the site that would not be possible otherwise.

Finding No. 3 That granting the Minor Exception will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injuries to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.

Finding of Fact The proposed increase to the permitted structure height will not deprive the site from having adequate access to and from the site. Therefore, the project will not have any significa nt negative impacts upon environmental quality or natural resources and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the project site or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the project site is located.

Finding No. 4 That granting the Minor Exception does not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located.

Finding of Fact The location and operating characteri stics of the proposed project will be consistent with all provisions of the Development Code. The proposed use will be compatible with the existing and future commercial land uses within the surrounding area. The proposal will not create conditions that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity due to the proposal being consistent with the Commercial General (CG -1) zone. Furthermore, a development of a self -storage facility comprised of two (2) buildings aims at strategically infilling an underutilized vacant site into a sustainable operation that will benefit the surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, no land use conflict or adverse effects on public health, safety or welfare are anticipated to result from the development, establishment and operation of self-storage facility.

Finding No. 5 That granting the Minor Exception does not exceed 10% of the standard(s) being modified, or allow a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the regulations governing the subject parcel.

Packet Pg.
490

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
10 Finding of Fact The Minor Exception is requested for an increase in the permitted structure height only. The proposed additional three (3) feet to the permitted thirty (30) feet, within the Commercial General (CG -1) zone, does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the standard being modified.

Additionally, the proposed use is within the authorized land use designation governing the proposed project site.

Finding No. 6 That granting the Minor Exception will not be inconsistent with the General Plan.

Finding of Fact General Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.2.1: Ensure compatibility between land uses and quality design through adherence to standards and regulations in the Development Code and policies and guidelines in the Community Design Element.

The proposed project would allow for the applicant to develop, establish and operate a self -storage facility comprised of two (2) buildings on an underutilized vacant site while adhering to the development standards, design guidelines, and policies. Therefore, the proposed project would be compatible with surrounding land uses and consistent with the General Plan.

SECTION 3. CONDITIONS OF APPROV AL:

The approval of Subdivision 22- 08, Conditional Use Permit 22- 12 and Minor Exception 22-04 shall be subject to the following Conditions of Approval:

1. This approval is to allow the consolidation of seven (7) parcels into one (1) parcel (Tentative Parcel Map 20628) containing a total of approximately 2.43 acres to allow the development of, establishment, and operation of a self -storage facility comprised of two (2) multi- story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and approve a ten (10) percent increase in building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty (33) feet located at 1534 W.

Highland Avenue (0148 -174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18), within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone.

2. The project site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with: (i) the plans stamped January 10, 2023 (EXHIBIT “A”), approved by the City, which includes a site plan, floor plan, exterior -elevations plan, and conceptual -landscaping plan on file with the Planning Division; (ii) the Conditions of Approval contained herein; and (iii) the City’s Municipal Code regulations.

3. Within two (2) years of the approval of the Conditional Use Permit, the commencement of construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if at any time after the commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one (1) year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void. However, approval of the Conditional Use Permit does not authorize the commencement of construction. All necessary permits must be obtained prior to the commencement of specified construction activities included in the Conditions of Approval.

Packet Pg.
491

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
11 EXPIRATION DATE: January 10, 2025

4. The review authority may grant a time extension, for good cause, not to exceed twelve (12) months. The applicant must file an application, the processing fees, and all required submittal items thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all Development Code provisions in effect at the time of the requested extension.

5. In the event this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and will fully cooperate in the defense of this matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of San Bernardino (“City”), any departments, agencies, divisions, boards, and/or commissions of the City, and any predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, directors, elected officials, officers, employees, representatives, and attorneys of the City from any claim, action, or proceeding against any of the foregoing persons or entities . The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City for any costs or attorneys’ fees, which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition.

The costs, salaries, and expenses of the City Attorney and employees of his office shall be considered “attorneys’ fees” for purposes of this condition. As part of the consideration for issuing this Conditional Use Permit, this condition shall remain in effect if the Conditional Use Permit is rescinded or revoked, whether or not at the request of applicant.

Planning Division

6. Construction-related activities may not occur between the hours of 8:00 pm and 7:00 am. No construction vehicles, equipment, or employees may be delivered to, or arrive at , the construction site before 7:00 am or leave the site after 8:00 pm.

7. If the colors of the buildings or other exterior finish materials are to be modified beyond the current proposal and improvement requirem ents, the revised color scheme and/or finish materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the commencement of work.

8. The exterior material finishes and color scheme for the walk-in cooler/freezer shall match the exterior mater ial finishes and color scheme of the main structure. The exterior material finishes, and color scheme shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to plan check submittal to the Building and Safety Division.

9. The project landscape plans shall be in substantial compliance with the Conceptual Landscape plan and prepared in accordance with the Development Code, section 19.28.120 (Water Efficient Landscaping Standards).

10. Maintenance of approved landscaping shall consist of regular watering, mowing, pruning, fertilizing, clearing of debris and weeds, the removal and replacement of dead plants, and the repair and replacement of irrigation systems and integrated architectural features.

Packet Pg.
492

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
12 11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the landowner shall file a maintenance agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain shall ensure that if the landowner, or subsequent owners, fails to maintain the required/installed site improvements, the City will be able to file an appropriate lien(s) against the property in order to accomplish the required maintenance.

12. Minor modifications to the plans shall be subject to approval by the Director through the Minor Modification Permit process. Any modification that exceeds 10% of the allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the re-filing of the original application.

13. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Building and Safety Division, Police Department, Municipal Water Department, Public Works Department, and the City Clerk’s Office/Business Registration Division.

14. This approval shall comply with the requirements of other outside agencies (i.e., San Bernardino County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health Se rvices, San Bernardino County Consolidated Fire District, and California Board of Equalization), as applicable.

15. The facility operator and property owner shall be responsible for regular maintenance of the project site. The site shall be maintained in a clean condition and free of litter or any other undesirable material(s). Vandalism, graffiti, trash, and other debris shall be removed and cleaned up within twenty-four (24) hours of being reported.

16. Signs are not approved as part of this permit. Prior to es tablishing any new signs, or to replacing existing signs, the applicant shall submit an application and receive approval for a Sign Permit from the Planning Division. Banners, flags, pennants, and similar signs are prohibited unless a Temporary Sign Permit is obtained.

17. All exterior lighting shall be contained within property lines and be energy efficient, with the option to lower or reduce usage when the facility is closed.

18. Submittal requirements for permit applications (site improvements, landscaping, etc.) to Building Plan Check and/or Land Development must include all Conditions of Approval issued with this approval, printed on the plan sheets.

19. All conditions of the Public Works Department shall be met to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

20. All Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements shall be implemented and/or completed prior to final inspection and/or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

San Bernardino County Fire District

21. Access. The development shall have a minimum of 2 points of vehicular access. These are for fire/emergency equipment access and for evacuation routes. A) Single Story Road Access

Packet Pg.
493

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
13 Width. All buildings shall have access provided by approved roads, alleys and private drives with a minimum twenty -six (26) foot unobst ructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. Other recognized standards may be more restrictive by requi ring wider access provisions. B) Multi-Story Road Access Width. Buildings three (3) stories in height or more shall have a minimum access of thirty (30) feet unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height.

22. Access – 150+ feet. Roadways exceeding one hundred fifty (150) feet in length shall be approved by the Fire Department. These shall be e xtended to within one hundred fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building.

23. Additional Requirements. In addition to the Fire requirements stated herein, other onsite and offsite improvements may be required which cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to this office.

24. Building Plans. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval.

25. Commercial Addressing. Commercial and industrial developments of 100,000 sq. ft or less shall have the street address installed on the building with numbers that are a minimum six (6) inches in hei ght and with a three quarter (3/4) inch stroke. The street address shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be electrically illuminated (internal or external). Where the building is two hundred (200) feet or more fr om the roadway, additional non- illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.

26. Fire Alarm – Manual. A manual, automatic or manual and automatic fire alarm system complying with the California Fire Code, NF PA and all applicable codes is required. The applicant shall hire a Fire Department approved fire alarm contractor. The fire alarm contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal.

27. Fire Extinguishers. Hand portable fire extinguishers are required. The location, type, and cabinet design shall be approved by the Fire Department.

28. Fire Fee. The required fire fees shall be paid to the San Bern ardino County Fire Department/Community Safety Division.

29. Fire Flow Test. Your submittal did not include a flow test report to establish whether the public water supply is capable of meeting your project fire flow demand. You will be required to produce a current flow test report from your water purveyor demonstr ating that the fire flow demand is satisfied. This requirement shall be completed prior to combination inspection by Building and Safety.

30. Fire Sprinkler -NFPA #13. An automatic fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA Pamphlet #13 and the Fire Department standards is required. The applicant shall hire a Fire

Packet Pg.
494

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
14 Department approved fire sprinkler contractor. The fire sprinkler contractor shall submit plans to the with hydraulic calculation and manufacturers specification sheets to the Fire Department for appr oval and approval. The contractor shall submit plans showing type of storage and use with the applicable protection system. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal.

31. Hydrant Marking. Blue reflective pavement markers indicating fire hydrant locations shall be installed as specified by the Fire Department. In areas where snow removal occurs or non - paved roads exist, the blue reflective hydrant marker shall be posted on an approved post along the side of the road, no more than three (3) f eet from the hydrant and at least six (6) feet high above the adjacent road.

32. Inspection by the Fire Department. Permission to occupy or use the building (certificate of Occupancy or shell release) will not be granted until the Fire Department inspects, approves and signs off on the Building and Safety job card for “fire final”.

33. Jurisdiction. The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County Fire Department herein “Fire Department”. Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current California Fire Code requirements and all applicable status, codes, ordinances and sta ndards of the Fire Department.

34. Key Box. An approved Fire Department key box is required. In commercial, industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.

35. Override Switch. Where an automatic electric security gate is used, an approved Fire Department override switch (Knox ®) is required.

36. Roof Certification. A letter from a licensed structural (or truss) engineer shall be submitted with an original wet stamp at time of fire sprinkler plan review, ver ifying the roof is capable of accepting the point loads imposed on the building by the fire sprinkler system design.

37. Secondary Access Paved. Prior to building permits being issued to any new structure, the secondary access road shall be paved or an allweather surface and shall be installed as specified in the General Requirement conditions including width, vertical clearance and turnouts.

38. Sprinkler Installation Letter. The applicant shall submit a letter to the Fire Department agreeing and committing to installation of a fire protection system prior to the building inspection for drywall and insulation.

39. Street Sign. This project is required to have an approved street sign (temporary or permanent). The street sign shall be installed on the nearest street corner to the project.

Installation of the temporary sign shall be prior any combustible material being placed on the construction site. Prior to final inspection and occupancy of the first structure, the permanent street sign shall be installed.

Packet Pg.
495

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
15 40. Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all -weather driving capabilities.

Road surface shall meet the approval of the Fire Chief prior to installat ion. All roads shall be designed to 85% compaction and/or paving and hold the weight of Fire Apparatus at a minimum of 80K pounds.

41. Turnaround. An approved turnaround shall be provided at the end of each roadway one hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet; all roadways shall not exceed a 12 % grade and have a minimum of forty-five (45) foot radius for all turns. In the Fire Safety Overlay District areas, there are additional requirements.

42. Water System Prior to any land disturbance, the water systems shall be designed to meet the required fire flow for this development and shall be approved by the Fire Department. The required fire flow shall be determined by using California Fire Code. The Fire Flow for this project shall be: 3,125 GPM for 3 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. Fire Flow is based on a 54,625 square feet structure.

43. Water System Certification. The applicant shall provide the Fire Department with a letter from the serving water company, certifying that the required water improvements have been made or that the existing fire hydrants and water system will meet distance and fire flow requirements. Fire flow water supply shall be in place prior to placing combusti ble materials on the job site.

44. Water System Commercial. A water system approved and inspected by the Fire Department is required. The system shall be operational, prior to any combustibles being stored on the site. Fire hydrants shall be spaced no more t han three hundred (300) feet apart (as measured along vehicular travel-ways) and no more than three hundred (300) feet from any portion of a structure.

San Bernardino Municipal Water District – Environmental Control Division

45. As proposed and based on the information provided and preliminary plans, SBMWD Environmental Control plan check review is not required.

San Bernardino Municipal Water District – Engineering Division

46. If any new domestic, landscape, &/or fire services are needed a request for any old services to be abandoned must be received prior to acquisition of service credits applied to the new services.

47. For any buildings or expansions being built, sewer connection & capacity fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit.

48. If there are any street improvements associated with the project then it is the developer/s and/or engineer/s responsibility to submit a copy of the street improvements plans to SBMWD’s engineering section for review.

Packet Pg.
496

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
16 49. Establish & resolve the easements for on- site water & sewer laterals to adjacent non -project parcels (for 1541 24th street & 1526 Highland Avenue). No easements required for the benefit of the SBMWD.

Public Works Department

50. Drainage and Flood Control
a) All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the Building Official, which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino County Flood Control Department. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. b) A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right - of-way dedicated as necessary.
c) The detention basin shall be designed in accordance with “Detention Basin Design Criteria for San Bernardino County.” Retention basins are not acceptable. d) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
e) If site drainage is to be outlet into the public street, the drainage shall be conveyed through a parkway culvert constructed in accordance with City Standard No. 400.

Conveyance of site drainage over the Driveway approaches will not be permitted. f) An approved Preliminary Full Categorical Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be required for the project entitlement. Please submit at the time of Planning submittal. The applicant is directed to the County of San Bernardino’s Flood Control web page for the template and Technical Guidance Document. g) A Final Full- Categorical Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is required for this project. The applicant is directed to the County of San Bernardino’s Flood Control web page for the template and Technical Guidance Document. The Land Development Division, prior to issuance of any permit, shall approve the WQMP. A CD copy of the approved WQMP and Hydrology Study shall be required prior to grading permit issuance.
h) A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required. The applicant is directed to State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) SMART Login syste m.

The SWPPP shall be approved by the State and a CD copy of the approved SWPPP shall be submitted to City prior to grading permit issuance. i) A "Notice of Intent (NOI)" shall be filed with the State Water Resources Control Board for construction disturbing 1 acre or more of land (including the project area, construction yards, storage areas, etc.). A WDID number issued by the State of California is required prior to the issuance of grading permit. j) The Land Development Division, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon.

Packet Pg.
497

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
17 51. Grading and Landscaping
a) The grading and on- site improvement plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the Building Official. b) If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal permit conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.100 of the Development Code shal l be obtained from the Department of Community Development - Planning Division prior to issuance of any grading or site development permits. c) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section 3317.2 of the California Building Code. d) If the grading plan indicates export or import, the source of the import material or the site for the deposition of the export shall be noted on the grading plan. Permit numbers shall be noted if the source or destination is in the City of San Bernardino. e) If more than 50 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City Streets then a special hauling permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer. Additional conditions, such as truck route approval, traffic controls, bonding, covering of loads, street cleaning, etc. may be required by the City Engineer.
f) Wheel stops are not permitted by the Development Code, except at designated accessible parking spaces. Therefore, continuous 6” high curb shall be used around planter areas and areas where head in parking is adjacent to walkways. The parking spaces may be 16.5’ deep and may overhang the landscaping or walkway by 2.5’.

Overhang into the setback area or into an ADA path of travel (minimum 4’ wide) is not permitted.
g) An accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be paved and shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6.5 feet. All accessible parking spaces shall be a minimum of 18 feet by 9 feet net. h) Continuous concrete curbing at least 6 inches high and 6 inches wide shall be provided at least 3 feet from any wall, fence, property line, walkway, or structure where parking and/or drive aisles are located adjacent thereto. Curbing may be left out at structure access points. The space between the curb and wall, fence, property line, walkway or structure shall be landscaped, except as allowed by the Development Review Committee.
i) The refuse enclosure(s) shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing No. 508 with an accessible path of travel. The minimum size of the refuse enclosure shall be 8 feet x 15 feet for bins storage area. Where a refuse enclosure is proposed to be constructed adjacent to spaces for parking passenger vehicles, a 3’ wide by 6 “ high concrete planter shall be provided to separate the enclosure from the adjacent parking. The placement of the enclosure and design of the planter shall preclude the enclosure doors from opening into drive aisles or impacting against adjacent parked cars.
j) Retaining walls, block walls and all on- site fencing shall be designed and detailed on the on-site improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the on- site improvement permit issued by the Building Official. All masonry walls shall be constructed of decorative block with architectural features acceptable to the City Planner. k) No construction on a site shall begin before a temporary/security fence is in place and approved by the Building Official or his designee. Temporary/security fencing may

Packet Pg.
498

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
18 not be removed until approved by the Building Official or his designee. The owner or owner’s agent shall immediately remove the temporary/security fencing upon the approval of the Building Official or his designee. Sites that contain multiple buildings shall maintain the temporary/security fencing around the portion of the site and buildings under construction as determined by the Building Official or his designee. All t emporary/security fencing for construction sites shall include screening, emergency identification and safety identification and shall be kept in neat and undamaged condition.
l) The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on- site lighting, including light location, type of poles and fixtures, foundation design with structural calculations, conduit location, material and size, and Photometric plot shall be provided which show that the proposed on-site lighting design will provide:
i) 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly distributed over the surface of the parking lot during hours of operation, and
ii) 0.25 foot-candles security lighting during all other hours. m) The design of on- site improvements shall also comply with all requirements of The California Bu ilding Code, Title 24, relating to accessible parking and accessibility, including retrofitting of existing building access points for accessibility, if applicable. n) An accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be paved and shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6.5 feet. All accessible parking spaces shall be a minimum of 18 feet by 9ft. o) A liquefaction evaluation is required for the site. This evaluation must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction evaluation shall be incorporated in the grading plan.
p) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Land Development Division prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 3 copies to the Land Development Division for Checking.
q) Prior to occupancy of any building, the developer may be required to post a bond to guarantee the maintenance and survival of project landscaping for a period of one year.
r) The applicant must post a grading bond prior to issuance of a grading permit. The amount of the bond is to be determined by the Land Development Division. s) The applicant must post a performance bond prior to issuance of the on- site permit.

The amount of the bond is to be determined by Land Development. t) The public right -of-way, between the property line and top of curb (also known as “parkway”) along adjoining streets shall be landscaped by the developer and maintained in perpetuity by the property owner. Details of the parkway landscaping shall be included in the project’s on-site landscape plan. u) All electrical transformers located outdoors on the site, shall be screened from view with a solid wall or landscaping and shall not be located in any setback/right -of-way area. If the transformer cannot be screened, it shall be located in an underground vault unless approved by the City Engineer pursuant to Section 19.30.110.

Packet Pg.
499

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
19 52. On-Site Utilities
a) City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV optional for commercial, industrial, or institutional uses).
b) The project site shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so the City or the agency providing such services in the area can serve it. c) Backflow preventers shall be installed for any building with the finished floor elevation below the rim elevation of the nearest upstream manhole. d) This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department. Therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be designed and constructed in accordance to the requirements of SBMWD.
e) On-site Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as required.
f) All existing overhead on- site utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be placed underground in accordance with Section 19.20.030 of the Development Code.
g) Existing on-site Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. h) An encroachment permit from Public Works Department shall be required for utility cuts into existing streets or any work within City’s right-of-way. Pavement restoration or trench repair shall be in conformance with City Standard No. 310. Public facilities shall be restored or constructed back to Public Works Department satisfaction.

53. Mapping
a) A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required. b) The applicant‘s surveyor/engineer shall submit a Parcel Map with supporting documents for review and approval to Land Development. The Parcel map shall be recorded prior to building permit issuance.

54. Street Improvement and Dedications
a) For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right -of-way (R.W.) per the General Plan and Municipal Code shall provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows:

Street Name
Dedication shall be
Right of Way(ft.)
From Centerline
Curb Widening shall be
Curb Line(ft)
From Centerline

Highland Avenue
(0148-174-04-0000,
0148-174-10-0000,
0148-174-11-0000,
0148-174-15-0000,
0148-174-16-0000,
0148-174-17-0000,
0148-174-18-0000)

41.25’ Existing

8.75’ Dedication
for a total ½ width of
50’
“Major Arterial”

32’± Existing
36’ Proposed
Per General Plan

Packet Pg.
500

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
20 Cabrera Avenue
(0148-174-04-0000,
0148-174-10-0000,
0148-174-11-0000,
0148-174-15-0000,
0148-174-16-0000,
0148-174-17-0000,
0148-174-18-0000)

25’ Existing
5’ Dedication
for a total ½ width of
30’
“Local - Continuous”

18’± Existing
20’ Proposed
Per General Plan

b) Highland Avenue – TI = 10.0 :
i) The street shall be rehabilitated to meet the requirements detailed in a soils report based on the “R” value of the subgrade and the traffic Index, or The City’s has a minimum of 2” Grind and Overlay; However, if the Soils Report is obtained and indicates a thicker improvement, the thicker section shall be used. ii) When Striping, all striping shall be thermoplastic paint per section 84 of the Caltrans specifications.
iii) The existing curb & gutter, sidewalk, and driveway fronting the site are in poor condition, the curb & gutter panels, sidewalk panels, and driveways shall be replaced per city standards. MC12.92.040, Ord. MC -1274, 7-22- 08; Ord. MC - 1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-691, 12-19-89.
iv) Remove existing driveways that are not being used under the project plans and replace with Curb Gutter and Sidewalk per city Standards. MC12.92.030- A, B, Ord. MC-1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-691, 12-19-89.
v) The corner shall be a 35’ Radius including a compliant ADA ramp with By- Pass and Truncated Domes. City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. vi) Construct Commercial Driveway Approach per City Standard No. 204, Type II, including an accessible by- pass around the top of the drive approach. Minimum Width is 26’. No Driveways closer than 100’ from BCR/ECR as directed by the City Engine er. MC12.28.060, MC12-28-100, MC15.04.230, MC16.20.030,

19.24.060, MC19.30.200, Ord. MC -1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC -460, 5-15-85; Ord.

MC-320, 12-06-83; Ord. 3918, 2-25- 80; Ord. 2519, 8-20- 63; Ord. 1963, 11-18- 52, Ord. MC-1531, 6-03-20, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. vii) Driveways in Commercial, Industrial, or multi -Family units, no gates shall be placed closer or impede 40’ from back of sidewalk, as directed by the Traffic Engineer.
viii) Construct 8" Curb and Gutter per City Standard No. 200, type “B”. City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy.
ix) Construct Sidewalk per City Standard No. 202; Case "A" (6’ wide adjacent to curb), M12.92.050, MC19.30.170, Ord. MC-1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-691, 12-19- 89, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. x) An ADA Ramp shall be constructed at corner in acco rdance with the SPPWC (Standard Plans for Public Works Construction) or Caltrans Standard plans A88A.

Federal Highway – DIB82-04, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy.

Packet Pg.
501

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
21 xi) Remove Street Light from SCE Wooden Pole.
xii) Install LED Street Lights System adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard No’s. SL-1, SL-2, and SL-3. Also, when more than three (3) streetlights a separate street light plan sheet shall be submitted in accordance with the City of San Bernardino Street Lighting Design Polic ies. Install ID Plate on Street light pole. Connect to Existing Street Light System.
xiii) Install type II Bike Lane per “Manual Uniform Traffic Control Devices - California”, as directed by the City Traffic Engineer, SBCTA (San Bernardino County Transportation Authority) Non-Motorized Transportation Plan rev. 2018. xiv) Underground existing poles, all utility line(s) including electrical under 34kv shall be underground and poles removed, MC19.20.030.28, MC19.30.110, City of San Bernardino Public Works - Street Improvement Policy.
xv) Install 2 -3” Conduit 36” under the sidewalk with pull rope and pull boxes for future Traffic connections.
xvi) No Parking will be allowed on Highland Avenue, install signs per city standards. xvii) Survey Monuments and ties shall be placed, replaced, tied out and recorded at any corner or alignment changes that are adjacent to the project area in accordance with California Land Surveyors Association – Monument Preservation Guidelines, Copies of Recorded Monuments/Ties shall be delivered to Public Works/Engineering.
c) Cabrera Avenue – TI = 5.5: * - **
i) The street shall be rehabilitated to meet the requirements detailed in a soils report based on the “R” value of the subgrade and the Traffic Index. The City’s has a minimum standard for new streets (4” AC over 8” Base) except truck usage (9”AC over 12” Base); However, the Soils Report may indicate a thicker or different improvement.
ii) When Striping, all striping shall be thermoplastic paint per section 84 of the Caltrans specifications.
iii) The existing curb & gutte r, sidewalk, and driveway fronting the site are in poor condition, the curb & gutter panels, sidewalk panels, and driveways shall be replaced per city standards. MC12.92.040, Ord. MC -1274, 7- 22-08; Ord. MC - 1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-691, 12-19-89.
iv) The corner shall be a 35’ Radius including a compliant ADA ramp with By- Pass and Truncated Domes. City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. v) Construct Commercial Driveway Approach per City Standard No. 204, Type II, including an accessible by- pass around the top of the drive approach. Minimum Width is 26’. No Driveways closer than 100’ from BCR/ECR as directed by the City Engineer. MC12.28.060, MC12-28-100, MC15.04.230, MC16.20.030,

19.24.060, MC19.30.200, Ord. MC -1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC -460, 5-15-85; Ord.

MC-320, 12-06-83; Ord. 3918, 2- 25-80; Ord. 2519, 8- 20-63; Ord. 1963, 11- 18- 52, Ord. MC-1531, 6-03-20, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. vi) Driveways in Commercial, Industrial, or multi -Family units, no gates shall be placed closer or impede 40’ from back of sidewalk, as directed by the Traffic Engineer.

Packet Pg.
502

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
22 vii) Construct 8" Curb and Gutter per City Standard No. 200, type “B”. City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy.
viii) Construct Sidewalk per City Standard No. 202; Case "A" (6’ wide adj acent to curb), M12.92.050, MC19.30.170, Ord. MC-1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-691, 12-19- 89, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. ix) An ADA Ramp shall be constructed at corner in accordance with the SPPWC (Standard Plans for Public Works Construction) or Caltrans Standard plans A88A.

Federal Highway – DIB82-04, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy.
x) Remove Street Light from SCE Wooden Pole.
xi) Existing Street Light System shall be replaced to LED (Head -Bulb) in accordance with City Standard Nos. SL-1, SL-2, and SL-3. Also, a separate light plan may be submitted in accordance with the City of San Bernardino Street Lighting Design Policies. Install ID Plate on Street light pole. As directed by the City Engineer. xii) No Parking will be allowed on Cabrera Avenue, install signs per city standards. xiii) Survey Monuments and ties shall be placed, replaced, tied out and recorded at any corner or alignment changes that are adjacent to the project area in accordance with California Land Surveyors Association – Monument Preservation Guidelines, Copies of Recorded Monuments/Ties shall be delivered to Public Works/Engineering.
∗ These Conditions are set for an estimated construction with- in two years. If construction exceeds two years from DERC Approval these conditi ons shall be reviewed and updated as needed.
**
If a Scoping Form is required, this form shall indicated the need of a Traffic Report, the results of the traffic report shall become conditions of this project which may increase or extend the above requirements in section 1(b) and 5(a).
d) With Submittal o f improvement plans including but not limited to grading plans, Street improvement plans, storm drain and retention/detention basin plans, and erosion/sediment control plans, The Applicant shall cause to be formed, or shall be annexed into an existing, Com munity Facilities District(s) (CFD) (2019 -1 Maintenance) for landscaping, lighting, streets, drainage facilities, street sweeping, graffiti removal, or other infrastructure, as required by the City to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Applicant shall initiate the maintenance and benefit assessment district(s) formation, or annexation, by submitting a landowner petition and consent form (provided by the City) and deposited necessary fees concurrent with the application for street and grading plan re view and approval; and said maintenance and benefit assessment district(s) shall be established concurrent with the approval of the final map in the case of the subdivision of land, or prior issuance of any certificate of occupancy where there is no subdivision of land, and as approved by the City Engineer. Reso 2018-264, Reso 2019-178.
e) If a drainage report is required by Land Development, A second copy of the drainage report will be delivered to public works, if offsite or overflow storm drain systems are identified, all systems shall be identified on the street improvement plans, and public storm drain shall be on a separate set of plans.

Packet Pg.
503

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
23 f) A temporary construction encroachment permit from Public Works Department shall be required for utility cuts into existing streets or any work within City’s right -of- way. Pavement restoration or trench repair shall be in conformance with City Standard No. 310. Public facilities shall be restored or constructed back to Public Works Department satisfaction.
g) Any pavement works affecting the traffic loop detectors shall be coordinated and subjected to Public Works Traffic Division requirements. h) The applicant must post a performance bond (Insurance, Deposit) prior to issuance of the off -site permit. The amount of the bond is to be determined by Public Works Department. MC12.03.110, Ord. MC-1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-1004, 10-21-97. i) The above conditions shall comply with current codes, policies, and standards at time of construction.
j) Prior to Certificate of Occupancy or Completion of Project all As -builts and Centerline Ties shall be submitted to Public Works.

55. Traffic Requirements
a) The applicant submitted a scope of study form and a vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) assessment. The scope was approved and will not require a traffic impact An alysis study, and the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) screening will not require a detailed screening analysis since the project lies in a Transit Priority Area.

56. Integrated Solid Waste Management
a) During demolition and/or construction, services are to be provided through the City of San Bernardino’s franchised hauler Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. b) The Site Plan identifies the development, establishment, and operation of a self - storage facility comprised of two new three-story buildings. The project site is located at 1534 W. Highland Avenue.
c) Burrtec Waste’s review of the Site Plan printed 9/20/22, identifies a single trash enclosure along the north property line northwest of Building 2. Usable enclosure dimensions are 12’x 12’. It is accessed by a 30-foot- wide driveway with a “T” intersection to the south that can be used for collection truck turnarounds. d) Based upon the information provided, the project meets or exceeds Burrtec minimum requirements for trash enclosure location and accessibility. Burrtec will therefore provide standard commercial collection services for trash and mixed recyclables. e) Any changes to the overall project design, enclosure specifications or location, or access may adversely impact Burrtec’s ability to service the project. Any design modifications that could impact Bu rrtec’s service will be subject to review and approval by Burrtec.
f) Burrtec’s review of this project is limited to determining whether it meets Burrtec’s minimum standards for waste and recycling collection services. Any comments or approvals by Burrtec ar e limited to these minimum standards as they relate to equipment and personnel and do not pertain to the project’s compliance with applicable federal, state, and local land use and environmental laws, building codes or other applicable government regulations. Any approvals by Burrtec do not warrant or

Packet Pg.
504

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
24 represent that Burrtec accepts any liability relative to the performance of waste and recycling collection services within this project.
g) Construct at a minimum a City Standard Plan 508 Refuse Enclosure and me et or exceed the minimum 8’ -0”x 15’ -0” clear interior dimensions required for the container storage area.
h) D isplay the refuse enclosure’s interior dimensions on the Site Plan. i) If a potential tenant/business is involved in the production, manufacture, distr ibution, or sale of food products, participation in a food waste recycling program is required per Assembly Bill 1826. This will require additional space within refuse enclosures for food waste containers. Therefore, City Standard Plan 508 Refuse Enclosure interior dimensions may need to be modified (enlarged) to accommodate the following:

Trash – One 4 cubic yard container
Recycling – One 4 cubic yard container
Food Waste – One 2 cubic yard container
j) Food waste generators with low volume yields may contact the Public Works Department to inquire about the use of 65- gallon food waste barrels. Modified refuse enclosures shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, the Building and Safety Division, and Burrtec Waste.
k) Contact the Building & Safety Division to determine ADA accessibility requirements.

Modifications made to refuse enclosures to meet ADA accessibility requirements shall not decrease the minimum clear interior dimensions needed for the container storage area.
l) Display clear drive aisle widths on the Site Plan.
m) Refuse enclosures within five (5) feet of combustible construction shall install an automatic fire sprinkler as approved by the Building & Safety Division and the San Bernardino County Fire Department. (See City Standard Plan 508). n) Refuse enclosure roofs shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet high interior at its lowest point, with minimal front protrusions that can be damaged during container servicing and must extend over any open side or the rear of the refuse enclosure by at le ast six (6) inches or as approved by the City.
o) Burrtec Waste Truck Turning Radius – All corners and intersections on streets and driveways leading to refuse enclosures shall have a turning radius adequate for a 35- foot long, three -axle collection truck. The minimum inside curb radius shall be at least 28 feet. The minimum outside curb radius shall be at least 42 feet. All streets and driveways shall comply with applicable City standards. Burrtec Waste’s truck turning template may be obtained from the Public Works Department in PDF and CAD.
p) Vertical and Horizontal Clearances – The minimum vertical clearance for collection trucks along the entire route to the refuse enclosure is fifteen (15) feet. The minimum vertical clearance in front of the refuse enclosure where the truck will empty the container shall be twenty -six (26) feet. The clear height shall be free of building overhangs, trees, and utility lines. The minimum horizontal clearance along the entire route to an enclosure is 12 feet.

Packet Pg.
505

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
25 q) Hammerhead Turnarou nds – Shall meet or exceed San Bernardino County Fire Protection District Diagram A -1.12: Hammerhead Turnaround Detail dated July 1, 2021. San Bernardino County Hammerhead detail may be obtained from the Public Works Department.
r) If gated, access shall be provided by means of a key, code, or remote. s) Assembly Bill 341 Mandatory Commercial Recycling may apply. t) Assembly Bill 1826 Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling may apply. u) Senate Bill 1383 Short-Lived Climate Pollutants Reduction Act may apply. v) Upon completion, service is provided through the City of San Bernardino’s franchised hauler Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. 111 E. Mill Street, San Bernardino, CA 92408 (909) 804-4222.

57. Required Engineering Plans
a) A complete submittal for plan checking shall consist of:
 street improvement plans (may include streetlights or street lighting may be separate plan),
 sewer plans (Private sewers may be shown on on -site improvement plan; public sewers must be on a separate plan with profile),
 storm drain plans (Private storm drains may be shown on on- site improvement plans; public storm drains must be on a separate plan with profile),  signing and striping plan (may be on sheets included in street improvement plan),  lighting (on-site lighting may be included in on-s ite improvement plan or may be on a separate stand-alone plan),
 grading (may be incorporated with on- site improvement plan and demolition plan),
 on-site improvement plans and on-site landscaping and irrigation,  water plans (shall be submitted to San Bernardino Municipal Water Department),  other plans as required. Piecemeal submittal of various types of plans for the same project will not be allowed.
 All required supporting calculations, studies and reports must be included in the initial submittal (inclu ding but not limited to drainage studies, soils reports, structural calculations)
b) All off -site improvement plans submitted for plan check shall be prepared on the City’s standard 24” x 36” sheets. A signature block (city standard block) satisfactory to the City Engineer or his designee can be found on the City Web Site http://www.sbcity.org/city_hall/public_works/engineering_division/engineering_deve lopment_resources E ngineering conditions of the project shall be inserted in the last pages of the plans.
c) After completion of plan checking, final mylar drawings with city standard block, stamped and signed by the Registered Civil Engineer in charge, shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval.
d) Electronic files of all improvement plans/drawings shall be submitted to the City Engineer. The files shall be compatible with AutoCAD 2021 and include a .dxf file of

Packet Pg.
506

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
26 the project. Files shall be on CD and shall be submitted at the same time the final mylar drawings are submitted for approval.
e) Copies of the City’s policies and procedures and standard drawings are available at the Public Works Counter for the cost of reproduction. They are also available at no charge at the Public Works Web Site at
http://www.sbcity.org/city_hall/public_works/engineering_division/design_policy_an d_procedure_documents

58. Required Engineering Permits
a) Grading and On-site improvements permit (LD).
b) WQMP/Hydrology (THR).
c) Parcel Map (MP).
d) Off-site improvement construction permits. (E).
e) Traffic Control and Right-of-Way permit (ROW).
f) CFD/Street Dedication permit (RP).

59. Applicable Engineering Fees
a) All plan check, permit, inspection, and impact fees are outlined on the Public Works Fee Schedule. A deposit in the amount of 100% of the estimated checking fee for each set of plans will be required at time of application for plan check. The amount of the fee is subject to adjustment if the construction cost estimate varies more than 10% from the estimate submitted with the application for plan checking. b) The current fee schedule is available at the Public Works Counter and at http://www.sbcity.org

Packet Pg.
507

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
27 SECTION 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:

The Planning Commission hereby takes the following action:

1. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-006:

a. Finding the Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) for Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22- 12 and Minor Exception 22-04 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and directing the Planning Commission Secretary to prepare and file with the Clerk of the County of San Bernardino a Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15062; and

b. Approving Subdivision 22- 08, Conditional Use Permit 22- 12 and Minor Exception 22-04 based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval.

SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY:

If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.

SECTION 7. CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS.

The location and custodian of the documents and any other material, which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission based its decision, is as follows: Genoveva Rocha, City Clerk, 201 North E Street (Building A), 909-384-5002.

Packet Pg.
508

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
28 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January 2023.

____________________________________
Monique Guerrero, Chairperson
San Bernardino Planning Commission

ATTEST:

David Murray, Planning Commission Secretary
City of San Bernardino, California

CERTIFICATION:

I, Jessica Nametz, Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-006, was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, a t a regular meeting thereof held on the 10
th day of January 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

____________________________________
Jessica Nametz, Recording Secretary
City of San Bernardino, California

Packet Pg.
509

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-006-PC
29 EXHIBIT “A”

APPROVED PLANS

Packet Pg.
510

Packet Pg.
511

Packet Pg.
512

Packet Pg.
513

Packet Pg.
514

Packet Pg.
515

Packet Pg.
516

Packet Pg.
517

Packet Pg.
518

Packet Pg.
519

Packet Pg.
520

Packet Pg.
521

Packet Pg.
522

Packet Pg.
523

Packet Pg.
524

Packet Pg.
525

Packet Pg.
526

Packet Pg.
527

Packet Pg.
528

Packet Pg.
529

Packet Pg.
530

Packet Pg.
531

Packet Pg.
532

Packet Pg.
533

Packet Pg.
534

Packet Pg.
535

Packet Pg.
536

Packet Pg.
537

Packet Pg.
538

Packet Pg.
539

Packet Pg.
540

Packet Pg.
541

Packet Pg.
542

Packet Pg.
543

Packet Pg.
544

29045662.1/203920.0002
Brent R. McManigal
Director
[email protected]
550 E. Hospitality Lane, Suite 350
San Bernardino, California 92408
PH (909) 723-1807 | FX (909) 890-9877
fennemorelaw.com
Fennemore LLP.

April 4, 2023

BY HAND DELIVERY
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
City of San Bernardino City Council
290 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Re: Revised Appeal of Planning Commission – Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:

On January 25, 2023, we sent on behalf of SAFStor Real Estate Company, LLC (“Applicant” or “SAFStor”) a letter appealing the Planning Commission’s denial of Applicant’s proposed project located at 1534 W. Highland Avenue (“Appeal Letter ”). The Appeal Letter included the following land use entitlements: Subdivision 22-08 (Tentative Parcel Map 20628), Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 (collectively, “Entitlements”). A copy of the Appeal Letter is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

At the Planning Commission’s hearing on January 10, 2023, the Commission voted to deny all three of the Entitlements; however, planning staff had to bring back a Resolution that included appropriate findings to support that denial.

When the Planning Commission met on March 14, 2023 it only denied Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 (Resolution 2023-006-PC). The Planning Commission was unable to make findings to deny Subdivision 22-08 and approved Resolution 2023-012-PC approving the parcel map.

Since the Planning Commission approved Subdivision 22-08, by this letter, we are removing Subdivision 22-08 from the Appeal Letter. Applicant is still appealing Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 and requests that the City Council over-turn the Planning Commission’s denial and approve the SAFStor Project. This Project is a significant investment in the City that will benefit everyone.

Packet Pg.
545

Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
April 4, 2023

Page 2 ends

29045662.1/203920.0002
Fennemore LLP.

Please contact me with any questions and I look forward to presenting and answering any questions at the City Council hearing.

Sincerely,

FENNEMORE LLP
Brent R. McManigal
BMCM/myr
Enclosures

Packet Pg.
546

EXHIBIT 1

Packet Pg.
547

Packet Pg.
548

Packet Pg.
549

Packet Pg.
550

Packet Pg.
551

Packet Pg.
552

Packet Pg.
553

Packet Pg.
554

Packet Pg.
555

Packet Pg.
556

Packet Pg.
557

Packet Pg.
558

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 1 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-079

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
GRANTING APPEAL 23-02 OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION’S DENIAL, THEREBY APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 22-12 AND MINOR
EXCEPTION 22-04 TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT,

ESTABLISHMENT, AND OPERATION OF A SELF-
STORAGE FACILITY COMPRISED OF TWO (2) MULTI-

STORY BUILDINGS CONTAINING A TOTAL OF
APPROXIMATELY 109,000 SQUARE FEET, AND A TEN
(10) PERCENT INCREASE IN THE BUILDING HEIGHT
FROM THIRTY (30) FEET TO THIRTY (33) FEET
LOCATED AT 1534 W. HIGHLAND AVENUE (APN: 0148-
174-04, 10, 11, 15 THROUGH 18), WITHIN THE
COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG-1) ZONE; AND FINDING

THE PROJECT SUBJECT TO A CATEGORICAL

EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.

WHEREAS, on July 11, 2022, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.66 (Subdivision Maps), Chapter 19.36 (Conditional Use Permits), and Chapter 19.58 (Minor Exceptions) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, an application for Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 was duly submitted by:

Owner: Annabi William N & Nellie N LIV TR
1032 Marcheta Street
Altadena, CA 91001
Applicant: SAFStor Real Estate Co, LLC
355 Oneta Street, Suite D100
Athens, GA 30601
Property Address: 1534 W. Highland Avenue
APN: 0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18
Lot Area: 2.43 acres
WHEREAS, Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22- 04 is a request to allow the consolidation of seven (7) parcels into one (1) parcel (Tentative Parcel Map 20628) containing a total of approximately 2.43 acres to allow the development, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and approve a ten (10) percent increase in building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty (33) feet; and

Packet Pg.
559

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 2 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
WHEREAS, the Planning Division of the Community and Economic Development Department has reviewed Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 for consistency with the City of San Bernardino General Plan, and compliance with the City of San Bernardino Development Code; and
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2023, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.52 (Hearings and Appeals) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 and at which meeting the Planning Commission considered Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2023, during said duly public hearing, after public testimony and deliberation among the Planning Commissioners, Commissioner Quiel made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2023-006 approving Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 based on the Findings of Fact presented, Commissioner Morales seconded the motion; and
WHEREAS, the motion failed by the following vote:

Ayes: Quiel, Morales, Guerrero
Nays: Lopez, Flores, Armstead, Lewis

Absent: Garcia
WHEREAS, at the January 10, 2023 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission listed various reasons for denying the project, including that the proposed land use will create a saturation of similar non-retail uses on a major commercial retail corridor, that the proposed land use is not compatible with retail uses located on a major commercial retail corridor, and that the proposed land use design and architecture is industrial in nature and not compatible with commercial retail uses located along a major commercial retail corridor; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 2023, pursuant to the requirements of Section 19.52.100 (Filing of Appeals) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the applicant submitted an application for Appeal No. 23-02 of the decision taken by the Planning Commission denying Subdivision 22-08, Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and WHEREAS, at the January 10, 2023 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission did not make any comments expressing opposition to the subdivision but instead focused its opposition on the proposed land use; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2023-012 was prepared for approval of Subdivision 22-08 since no findings could be made for denial, while Resolution No. 2023-006 was revised to ratify the Planning Commission’s decision to deny Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and

Packet Pg.
560

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 3 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2023, the Planning Commission took two actions: 1) adopted Resolution No. 2023-012 of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, approving Subdivision 22-08, and 2) adopted Resolution No. 2023-006 of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, denying Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and
WHEREAS, on April 4, 2023, the applicant submitted a letter revising Appeal 23-02 removing Subdivision 22-08 from the appeal while maintaining the appeal for the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04; and WHEREAS, notice of the May 3, 2023 public hearing for the Mayor and City Council's consideration of the proposed Resolution for Appeal 23-02 for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 was published in The Sun newspaper on, April 8, 2023, and was mailed to owners of property and tenants located within 1,000 feet of the subject property of the holding of the public hearing in accordance with Chapter 19.52 (Hearings and Appeals) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code; and
WHEREAS, at the Mayor and City Council Meeting of May 3, 2023, the item was pulled from the agenda; and
WHEREAS, notice of the June 7, 2023 public hearing for the Mayor and City Council's consideration of the proposed Resolution for Appeal 23-02 for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 was published in The Sun newspaper on, May 27, 2023, and was mailed to owners of property and tenants located within 1,000 feet of the subject property of the holding of the public hearing in accordance with Chapter 19.52 (Hearings and Appeals) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.52 (Hearings and Appeals) and Chapter 19.36 (Conditional Use Permits) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Mayor and City Council has the authority to take action on Appeal 23-02 for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. As the decision- making body for the project, the Mayor and City Council have reviewed and considered the information contained in the administrative record for Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04. Based upon the facts and information contained in the administrative record, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Mayor and City Council, the Mayor and City Council finds, as follows:

Packet Pg.
561

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 4 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
(1) The administrative record has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines;
(2) In accordance with Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines, the Mayor and City Council has determined that that consideration of Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 is exempt from CEQA due to fact that 1) the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; 2) the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; 3) the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; 4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and 5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services; and
(3) The determination of CEQA exemption reflects the independent judgment of the Mayor and City Council.

SECTION 3.Findings of Fact – Conditional Use Permit 22-12.

Finding No. 1:The proposed use is conditionally permitted within, and would not impair the integrity or character of, the subject land use district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code.

Finding of Fact:The proposed project is a conditionally permitted use, pursuant to Development Code Section 19.06.030(L)(14) and Section 19.06.030(2)(M).

The project site is located in the Commercial General (CG-1) zone and is substantially surrounded by existing commercial uses. The proposed development will comply with all applicable Development Code standards, such as parking landscaping, building setbacks and height, etc.

Furthermore, the development of the subject property will enhance the appearance of the currently underutilized property with the construction of the new commercial development with associated landscaping and on-site improvements. Therefore, the project would not impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district or be detrimental to surrounding properties.

Finding No. 2:The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan.

Finding of Fact:General Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.2.1: Ensure compatibility between land uses and quality design through adherence to standards and regulations in the Development Code and policies and guidelines in the Community Design Element.

General Plan Land Use Element Goal 2.4: Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in San Bernardino by strategic in-fill of new development and revitalization of existing development.

Packet Pg.
562

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 5 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
General Plan Community Design Element Goal 5.4: Ensure
individual projects are well designed and maintained.

General Plan Circulation Element Policy 6.9.1: Ensure that developments provide an adequate supply of parking to meet its needs either on-site or within close proximity.

The proposed project implements the above General Plan goals and policies in that the proposed development has been designed with quality architectural treatments. Development of the site will be done in a manner that will enhance the physical and visual qualities of the subject property with significant landscaping, thereby enhancing the aesthetics of the area.

Additionally, through this proposal the existing property will be transformed from an underutilized property into a development that meets the City’s development goals, while satisfying the Development Code requirements, and will be adequately regulated through the Conditions of Approval in order to minimize potential impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would be compatible with surrounding land uses and consistent with the General Plan.

Finding No. 3:Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use complies with the requirements of the CEQA and §19.20.030(6) of the Development Code.

Finding of Fact:In accordance with §15060 (Preliminary Review) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Division conducted an environmental evaluation in connection with proposed Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and concluded that Conditional Use Permit 22-12 is found to be exempt under Section 15061(b)(2) (Review for Exemption) of CEQA.

Pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of CEQA, a Class 32 Categorical Exemption consists of projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions contained within Section 15332 of CEQA. The design of the subdivision will not have any significant negative impacts to wildlife or their habitat, and no sensitive or protected species have been identified on the site. The subject property is located surrounded by existing commercial and residential development and has no significant negative impacts on the environment are anticipated to result from development of the site. Furthermore, Conditions of Approval will be imposed to alleviate potential impacts and there are no additional potential significant environmental impacts that may result from the proposed development and establishment of the proposed project.

Finding No. 4:There will be no potentially significant negative impacts on environmental quality or natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored.

Packet Pg.
563

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 6 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
Finding of Fact:The project site is located within an urbanized area and is surrounded by existing commercial development. Therefore, no significant negative impacts on the environment are anticipated to result from the proposed development.

Finding No. 5:The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the proposed use is to be located and will not create significant noise, traffic, or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

Finding of Fact:The proposed design is in compliance with the Development Code requirements that are applicable to location, height and setbacks for commercial development. The project site will have two (2) points of access with the main point of access from W. Highland Avenue and the secondary point of access from Cabrera Avenue. The internal site circulation has been designed to adequately accommodate on-site vehicular circulation and access to off-street parking areas. Therefore, the design of the project will ensure that the project will not create any significant noise, traffic, or other conditions that would be detrimental or objectionable to other uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

Finding No. 6:The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed.

Finding of Fact:The site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being proposed as evidenced by project compliance with the applicable Development Code standards. The proposed building meets all setback and height requirements. The size of the project site is adequate to accommodate the proposed improvements, in compliance with the requirements of the Development Code.

Finding No. 7:There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health or safety.

Finding of Fact:The project site will have two (2) points of access with the main point of access from W. Highland Avenue and the secondary point of access from Cabrera Avenue. The internal site circulation has been designed to adequately accommodate on-site vehicular circulation and access to off- street parking areas. All agencies responsible for reviewing access and providing water, sanitation and other public services to the site have had the opportunity to review the proposal, and none indicated inability to serve the

Packet Pg.
564

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 7 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
project site. Establishment of the proposed project, subject to Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental to public services or public health and safety.

SECTION 4.Findings of Fact – Minor Exception 22-04. Section 19.58.50 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code requires that Minor Exception applications meet certain findings prior to the approval by the Agency Director of Community, Housing, and Economic Development. Accordingly, the following findings are provided in support of the approval by the Community Development Director for Minor Exception 22-04.

Finding No. 1That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, the strict application of this Development Code deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zone classification.

Finding of FactPursuant to Section 19.06.030(1) (Commercial Zones – Development Standards) of the San Bernardino Development, the development of a new structure shall be a maximum of thirty (30) feet in height within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone. Proposed structure heights exceeding thirty (30) feet in height are subject to approval of a Minor Exception with appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination. The proposed project consists of the construction two (2) thirty-three (33) foot structures to exceed the maximum permitted height of thirty (30) feet for the development of a self-storage facility.

Currently, there are existing easements on the property that create additional constraints on project design. Two (2) easements are for on-site sewer and water lines that service abutting properties to the north and east of the project site. One (1) easement provides access for an existing on-site telecommunications facility. Due to these additional constraints the self- storage facility was developed to be comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings instead of one (1) building. Additionally, the proposed building heights should be increased to up to three (3) feet in order to accommodate mechanical, electrical and plumbing equipment. Therefore, the additional three (3) feet were necessary in order to allow the property to enjoy improvements enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zone classification.

Finding No. 2That granting the Minor Exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied to the property for which the Minor Exception is sought.

Finding of FactThe proposed project site has existing easements on the property that create additional constraints on project design. Two (2) easements are for on-site sewer

Packet Pg.
565

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 8 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
and water lines that service abutting properties to the north and east of the project site. One (1) easement provides access for an existing on-site telecommunications facility. Granting the requested Minor Exception would allow the applicant to form a structurally design development comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings instead of one (1) building. The current development standard would limit the structure height to thirty (30) feet, which would impede the development of a comprehensive and cost-effective new in-fill project. Therefore, the proposed increase in the structure’s height will allow the applicant to an improvement to the site that would not be possible otherwise.

Finding No. 3That granting the Minor Exception will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injuries to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.

Finding of FactThe proposed increase to the permitted structure height will not deprive the site from having adequate access to and from the site. Therefore, the project will not have any significant negative impacts upon environmental quality or natural resources and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the project site or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the project site is located.

Finding No. 4That granting the Minor Exception does not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located.

Finding of FactThe location and operating characteristics of the proposed project will be consistent with all provisions of the Development Code. The proposed use will be compatible with the existing and future commercial land uses within the surrounding area. The proposal will not create conditions that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity due to the proposal being consistent with the Commercial General (CG-1) zone.

Furthermore, the development of a self-storage facility comprised of two (2) buildings aims at strategically infilling an underutilized vacant site into a sustainable operation that will benefit the surrounding neighborhood.

Therefore, no land use conflict or adverse effects on public health, safety or welfare are anticipated to result from the development, establishment and operation of a self-storage facility.

Finding No. 5That granting the Minor Exception does not exceed 10% of the standard(s) being modified, or allow a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the regulations governing the subject parcel.

Finding of FactThe Minor Exception is requested for an increase in the permitted structure height only. The proposed additional three (3) feet to the permitted thirty (30) feet, within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone, does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the standard being modified. Additionally, the proposed

Packet Pg.
566

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 9 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
use is within the authorized land use designation governing the proposed project site.

Finding No. 6That granting the Minor Exception will not be inconsistent with the General Plan.

Finding of FactGeneral Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.2.1: Ensure compatibility between land uses and quality design through adherence to standards and regulations in the Development Code and policies and guidelines in the Community Design Element.

The proposed project would allow for the applicant to develop, establish and operate a self-storage facility comprised of two (2) buildings on an underutilized vacant site while adhering to the development standards, design guidelines, and policies. Therefore, the proposed project would be compatible with surrounding land uses and consistent with the General Plan.

SECTION 5. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. The Mayor and City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

SECTION 3.Conditions of Approval:

The approval of Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04 shall be subject to the following Conditions of Approval:

1. This approval is to allow the development of, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet, and approve a ten (10) percent increase in building height from thirty (30) feet to thirty (33) feet located at 1534 W. Highland Avenue (0148-174-04, 10, 11, 15 through 18), within the Commercial General (CG-1) zone.

2. The project site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with: (i) the approved plans (EXHIBIT “A”), approved by the City, which includes a site plan, floor plan, exterior- elevations plan, and conceptual-landscaping plan on file with the Planning Division; (ii) the Conditions of Approval contained herein; and (iii) the City’s Municipal Code regulations.

3. Within two (2) years of the approval, the commencement of construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if at any time after the commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one (1) year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void. However, approval of the Conditional Use Permit

Packet Pg.
567

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 10 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
does not authorize the commencement of construction. All necessary permits must be obtained prior to the commencement of specified construction activities included in the Conditions of Approval.

EXPIRATION DATE: June 7 2025

4. The review authority may grant a time extension, for good cause, not to exceed twelve (12) months. The applicant must file an application, the processing fees, and all required submittal items thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all Development Code provisions in effect at the time of the requested extension.

5. In the event this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and will fully cooperate in the defense of this matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of San Bernardino (“City”), any departments, agencies, divisions, boards, and/or commissions of the City, and any predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, directors, elected officials, officers, employees, representatives, and attorneys of the City from any claim, action, or proceeding against any of the foregoing persons or entities. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City for any costs or attorneys’ fees, which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition.

The costs, salaries, and expenses of the City Attorney and employees of his office shall be considered “attorneys’ fees” for purposes of this condition. As part of the consideration for issuing this Conditional Use Permit, this condition shall remain in effect if the Conditional Use Permit is rescinded or revoked, whether or not at the request of applicant.

Planning Division

6. Construction-related activities may not occur between the hours of 8:00 pm and 7:00 am. No construction vehicles, equipment, or employees may be delivered to, or arrive at, the construction site before 7:00 am or leave the site after 8:00 pm.

7. If the colors of the buildings or other exterior finish materials are to be modified beyond the current proposal and improvement requirements, the revised color scheme and/or finish materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the commencement of work.

8. The exterior material finishes and color scheme for the walk-in cooler/freezer shall match the exterior material finishes and color scheme of the main structure. The exterior material finishes, and color scheme shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to plan check submittal to the Building and Safety Division.

Packet Pg.
568

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 11 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0

9. The project landscape plans shall be in substantial compliance with the Conceptual Landscape plan and prepared in accordance with the Development Code, section 19.28.120 (Water Efficient Landscaping Standards).

10. Maintenance of approved landscaping shall consist of regular watering, mowing, pruning, fertilizing, clearing of debris and weeds, the removal and replacement of dead plants, and the repair and replacement of irrigation systems and integrated architectural features.

11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the landowner shall file a maintenance agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain shall ensure that if the landowner, or subsequent owners, fails to maintain the required/installed site improvements, the City will be able to file an appropriate lien(s) against the property in order to accomplish the required maintenance.

12. Minor modifications to the plans shall be subject to approval by the Director through the Minor Modification Permit process. Any modification that exceeds 10% of the allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the re-filing of the original application.

13. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Building and Safety Division, Police Department, Municipal Water Department, Public Works Department, and the City Clerk’s Office/Business Registration Division.

14. This approval shall comply with the requirements of other outside agencies (i.e., San Bernardino County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health Services, San Bernardino County Consolidated Fire District, and California Board of Equalization), as applicable.

15. The facility operator and property owner shall be responsible for regular maintenance of the project site. The site shall be maintained in a clean condition and free of litter or any other undesirable material(s). Vandalism, graffiti, trash, and other debris shall be removed and cleaned up within twenty-four (24) hours of being reported.

16. Signs are not approved as part of this permit. Prior to establishing any new signs, or to replacing existing signs, the applicant shall submit an application and receive approval for a Sign Permit from the Planning Division. Banners, flags, pennants, and similar signs are prohibited unless a Temporary Sign Permit is obtained.

17. All exterior lighting shall be contained within property lines and be energy efficient, with the option to lower or reduce usage when the facility is closed.

18. Submittal requirements for permit applications (site improvements, landscaping, etc.) to Building Plan Check and/or Land Development must include all Conditions of Approval issued with this approval, printed on the plan sheets.

Packet Pg.
569

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 12 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0

19. All conditions of the Public Works Department shall be met to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

20. All Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements shall be implemented and/or completed prior to final inspection and/or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

San Bernardino County Fire District

21. Access. The development shall have a minimum of 2 points of vehicular access. These are for fire/emergency equipment access and for evacuation routes. A) Single Story Road Access Width. All buildings shall have access provided by approved roads, alleys and private drives with a minimum twenty-six (26) foot unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. Other recognized standards may be more restrictive by requiring wider access provisions. B) Multi-Story Road Access Width. Buildings three (3) stories in height or more shall have a minimum access of thirty (30) feet unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height.

22. Access – 150+ feet. Roadways exceeding one hundred fifty (150) feet in length shall be approved by the Fire Department. These shall be extended to within one hundred fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building.

23. Additional Requirements. In addition to the Fire requirements stated herein, other onsite and offsite improvements may be required which cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to this office.

24. Building Plans. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval.

25. Commercial Addressing. Commercial and industrial developments of 100,000 sq. ft or less shall have the street address installed on the building with numbers that are a minimum six (6) inches in height and with a three quarter (3/4) inch stroke. The street address shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be electrically illuminated (internal or external). Where the building is two hundred (200) feet or more from the roadway, additional non-illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.

26. Fire Alarm – Manual. A manual, automatic or manual and automatic fire alarm system complying with the California Fire Code, NFPA and all applicable codes is required. The applicant shall hire a Fire Department approved fire alarm contractor. The fire alarm contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval.

The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal.

27. Fire Extinguishers. Hand portable fire extinguishers are required. The location, type, and cabinet design shall be approved by the Fire Department.

Packet Pg.
570

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 13 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0

28. Fire Fee. The required fire fees shall be paid to the San Bernardino County Fire Department/Community Safety Division.

29. Fire Flow Test. Your submittal did not include a flow test report to establish whether the public water supply is capable of meeting your project fire flow demand. You will be required to produce a current flow test report from your water purveyor demonstrating that the fire flow demand is satisfied. This requirement shall be completed prior to combination inspection by Building and Safety.

30. Fire Sprinkler-NFPA #13. An automatic fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA Pamphlet #13 and the Fire Department standards is required. The applicant shall hire a Fire Department approved fire sprinkler contractor. The fire sprinkler contractor shall submit plans to the with hydraulic calculation and manufacturers specification sheets to the Fire Department for approval and approval. The contractor shall submit plans showing type of storage and use with the applicable protection system. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal.

31. Hydrant Marking. Blue reflective pavement markers indicating fire hydrant locations shall be installed as specified by the Fire Department. In areas where snow removal occurs or non- paved roads exist, the blue reflective hydrant marker shall be posted on an approved post along the side of the road, no more than three (3) feet from the hydrant and at least six (6) feet high above the adjacent road.

32. Inspection by the Fire Department. Permission to occupy or use the building (certificate of Occupancy or shell release) will not be granted until the Fire Department inspects, approves and signs off on the Building and Safety job card for “fire final”.

33. Jurisdiction. The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County Fire Department herein “Fire Department”. Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current California Fire Code requirements and all applicable status, codes, ordinances and standards of the Fire Department.

34. Key Box. An approved Fire Department key box is required. In commercial, industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.

35. Override Switch. Where an automatic electric security gate is used, an approved Fire Department override switch (Knox ®) is required.

36. Roof Certification. A letter from a licensed structural (or truss) engineer shall be submitted with an original wet stamp at time of fire sprinkler plan review, verifying the roof is capable of accepting the point loads imposed on the building by the fire sprinkler system design.

37. Secondary Access Paved. Prior to building permits being issued to any new structure, the secondary access road shall be paved or an allweather surface and shall be installed as specified in the General Requirement conditions including width, vertical clearance and turnouts.

Packet Pg.
571

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 14 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0

38. Sprinkler Installation Letter. The applicant shall submit a letter to the Fire Department agreeing and committing to installation of a fire protection system prior to the building inspection for drywall and insulation.

39. Street Sign. This project is required to have an approved street sign (temporary or permanent).

The street sign shall be installed on the nearest street corner to the project. Installation of the temporary sign shall be prior any combustible material being placed on the construction site.

Prior to final inspection and occupancy of the first structure, the permanent street sign shall be installed.

40. Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities.

Road surface shall meet the approval of the Fire Chief prior to installation. All roads shall be designed to 85% compaction and/or paving and hold the weight of Fire Apparatus at a minimum of 80K pounds.

41. Turnaround. An approved turnaround shall be provided at the end of each roadway one hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet; all roadways shall not exceed a 12 % grade and have a minimum of forty-five (45) foot radius for all turns. In the Fire Safety Overlay District areas, there are additional requirements.

42. Water System Prior to any land disturbance, the water systems shall be designed to meet the required fire flow for this development and shall be approved by the Fire Department. The required fire flow shall be determined by using California Fire Code. The Fire Flow for this project shall be: 3,125 GPM for 3 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. Fire Flow is based on a 54,625 square feet structure.

43. Water System Certification. The applicant shall provide the Fire Department with a letter from the serving water company, certifying that the required water improvements have been made or that the existing fire hydrants and water system will meet distance and fire flow requirements. Fire flow water supply shall be in place prior to placing combustible materials on the job site.

44. Water System Commercial. A water system approved and inspected by the Fire Department is required. The system shall be operational, prior to any combustibles being stored on the site.

Fire hydrants shall be spaced no more than three hundred (300) feet apart (as measured along vehicular travel-ways) and no more than three hundred (300) feet from any portion of a structure.

San Bernardino Municipal Water District – Environmental Control Division

45. As proposed and based on the information provided and preliminary plans, SBMWD Environmental Control plan check review is not required.

Packet Pg.
572

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 15 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
San Bernardino Municipal Water District – Engineering Division

46. If any new domestic, landscape, &/or fire services are needed a request for any old services to be abandoned must be received prior to acquisition of service credits applied to the new services.

47. For any buildings or expansions being built, sewer connection & capacity fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit.

48. If there are any street improvements associated with the project then it is the developer/s and/or engineer/s responsibility to submit a copy of the street improvements plans to SBMWD’s engineering section for review.

49. Establish & resolve the easements for on-site water & sewer laterals to adjacent non-project parcels (for 1541 24th street & 1526 Highland Avenue). No easements required for the benefit of the SBMWD.

Public Works Department

50. Drainage and Flood Control
a) All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the Building Official, which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino County Flood Control Department. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. b) A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right- of-way dedicated as necessary.
c) The detention basin shall be designed in accordance with “Detention Basin Design Criteria for San Bernardino County.” Retention basins are not acceptable. d) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
e) If site drainage is to be outlet into the public street, the drainage shall be conveyed through a parkway culvert constructed in accordance with City Standard No. 400.

Conveyance of site drainage over the Driveway approaches will not be permitted. f) An approved Preliminary Full Categorical Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be required for the project entitlement. Please submit at the time of Planning submittal. The applicant is directed to the County of San Bernardino’s Flood Control web page for the template and Technical Guidance Document. g) A Final Full-Categorical Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is required for this project. The applicant is directed to the County of San Bernardino’s Flood Control web page for the template and Technical Guidance Document. The Land Development Division, prior to issuance of any permit, shall approve the WQMP. A CD copy of the approved WQMP and Hydrology Study shall be required prior to grading permit issuance.

Packet Pg.
573

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 16 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
h) A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required. The applicant is directed to State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) SMART Login system.

The SWPPP shall be approved by the State and a CD copy of the approved SWPPP shall be submitted to City prior to grading permit issuance. i) A "Notice of Intent (NOI)" shall be filed with the State Water Resources Control Board for construction disturbing 1 acre or more of land (including the project area, construction yards, storage areas, etc.). A WDID number issued by the State of California is required prior to the issuance of grading permit. j) The Land Development Division, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon.

51. Grading and Landscaping
a) The grading and on-site improvement plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the Building Official. b) If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal permit conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.100 of the Development Code shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development - Planning Division prior to issuance of any grading or site development permits.
c) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section 3317.2 of the California Building Code. d) If the grading plan indicates export or import, the source of the import material or the site for the deposition of the export shall be noted on the grading plan. Permit numbers shall be noted if the source or destination is in the City of San Bernardino. e) If more than 50 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City Streets then a special hauling permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer. Additional conditions, such as truck route approval, traffic controls, bonding, covering of loads, street cleaning, etc. may be required by the City Engineer.
f) Wheel stops are not permitted by the Development Code, except at designated accessible parking spaces. Therefore, continuous 6” high curb shall be used around planter areas and areas where head in parking is adjacent to walkways. The parking spaces may be 16.5’ deep and may overhang the landscaping or walkway by 2.5’.

Overhang into the setback area or into an ADA path of travel (minimum 4’ wide) is not permitted.
g) An accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be paved and shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6.5 feet. All accessible parking spaces shall be a minimum of 18 feet by 9 feet net. h) Continuous concrete curbing at least 6 inches high and 6 inches wide shall be provided at least 3 feet from any wall, fence, property line, walkway, or structure where parking and/or drive aisles are located adjacent thereto. Curbing may be left out at structure access points. The space between the curb and wall, fence, property line, walkway or

Packet Pg.
574

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 17 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
structure shall be landscaped, except as allowed by the Development Review Committee.
i) The refuse enclosure(s) shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing No. 508 with an accessible path of travel. The minimum size of the refuse enclosure shall be 8 feet x 15 feet for bins storage area. Where a refuse enclosure is proposed to be constructed adjacent to spaces for parking passenger vehicles, a 3’ wide by 6 “ high concrete planter shall be provided to separate the enclosure from the adjacent parking.

The placement of the enclosure and design of the planter shall preclude the enclosure doors from opening into drive aisles or impacting against adjacent parked cars. j) Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and detailed on the on-site improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the on-site improvement permit issued by the Building Official. All masonry walls shall be constructed of decorative block with architectural features acceptable to the City Planner. k) No construction on a site shall begin before a temporary/security fence is in place and approved by the Building Official or his designee. Temporary/security fencing may not be removed until approved by the Building Official or his designee. The owner or owner’s agent shall immediately remove the temporary/security fencing upon the approval of the Building Official or his designee. Sites that contain multiple buildings shall maintain the temporary/security fencing around the portion of the site and buildings under construction as determined by the Building Official or his designee.

All temporary/security fencing for construction sites shall include screening, emergency identification and safety identification and shall be kept in neat and undamaged condition.
l) The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on-site lighting, including light location, type of poles and fixtures, foundation design with structural calculations, conduit location, material and size, and Photometric plot shall be provided which show that the proposed on-site lighting design will provide:
i) 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly distributed over the surface of the parking lot during hours of operation, and
ii) 0.25 foot-candles security lighting during all other hours. m) The design of on-site improvements shall also comply with all requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to accessible parking and accessibility, including retrofitting of existing building access points for accessibility, if applicable. n) An accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be paved and shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6.5 feet. All accessible parking spaces shall be a minimum of 18 feet by 9ft. o) A liquefaction evaluation is required for the site. This evaluation must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements

Packet Pg.
575

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 18 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
recommended by the approved liquefaction evaluation shall be incorporated in the grading plan.
p) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Land Development Division prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 3 copies to the Land Development Division for Checking.
q) Prior to occupancy of any building, the developer may be required to post a bond to guarantee the maintenance and survival of project landscaping for a period of one year. r) The applicant must post a grading bond prior to issuance of a grading permit. The amount of the bond is to be determined by the Land Development Division. s) The applicant must post a performance bond prior to issuance of the on-site permit. The amount of the bond is to be determined by Land Development. t) The public right-of-way, between the property line and top of curb (also known as “parkway”) along adjoining streets shall be landscaped by the developer and maintained in perpetuity by the property owner. Details of the parkway landscaping shall be included in the project’s on-site landscape plan. u) All electrical transformers located outdoors on the site, shall be screened from view with a solid wall or landscaping and shall not be located in any setback/right-of-way area. If the transformer cannot be screened, it shall be located in an underground vault unless approved by the City Engineer pursuant to Section 19.30.110.

52. On-Site Utilities
a) City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV optional for commercial, industrial, or institutional uses).
b) The project site shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so the City or the agency providing such services in the area can serve it. c) Backflow preventers shall be installed for any building with the finished floor elevation below the rim elevation of the nearest upstream manhole. d) This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department. Therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be designed and constructed in accordance to the requirements of SBMWD.
e) On-site Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as required.
f) All existing overhead on-site utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be placed underground in accordance with Section 19.20.030 of the Development Code.
g) Existing on-site Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer.
h) An encroachment permit from Public Works Department shall be required for utility cuts into existing streets or any work within City’s right-of-way. Pavement restoration or trench repair shall be in conformance with City Standard No. 310. Public facilities shall be restored or constructed back to Public Works Department satisfaction.

53. Street Improvement and Dedications

Packet Pg.
576

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 19 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
a) For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way (R.W.) per the General Plan and Municipal Code shall provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows:

Street Name
Dedication shall be
Right of Way(ft.)
From Centerline
Curb Widening shall be
Curb Line(ft)
From Centerline
Highland Avenue
(0148-174-04-0000,
0148-174-10-0000,
0148-174-11-0000,
0148-174-15-0000,
0148-174-16-0000,
0148-174-17-0000,
0148-174-18-0000)

41.25’ Existing

8.75’ Dedication
for a total ½ width of
50’
“Major Arterial”
32’ Existing
36’ Proposed
Per General Plan
Cabrera Avenue
(0148-174-04-0000,
0148-174-10-0000,
0148-174-11-0000,
0148-174-15-0000,
0148-174-16-0000,
0148-174-17-0000,
0148-174-18-0000)
25’ Existing
5’ Dedication
for a total ½ width of
30’
“Local - Continuous”
18’ Existing
20’ Proposed
Per General Plan
b) Highland Avenue – TI = 10.0 :
i) The street shall be rehabilitated to meet the requirements detailed in a soils report based on the “R” value of the subgrade and the traffic Index, or The City’s has a minimum of 2” Grind and Overlay; However, if the Soils Report is obtained and indicates a thicker improvement, the thicker section shall be used. ii) When Striping, all striping shall be thermoplastic paint per section 84 of the Caltrans specifications.
iii) The existing curb & gutter, sidewalk, and driveway fronting the site are in poor condition, the curb & gutter panels, sidewalk panels, and driveways shall be replaced per city standards. MC12.92.040, Ord. MC-1274, 7-22-08; Ord. MC- 1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-691, 12-19-89.
iv) Remove existing driveways that are not being used under the project plans and replace with Curb Gutter and Sidewalk per city Standards. MC12.92.030-A, B, Ord.

MC-1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-691, 12-19-89.
v) The corner shall be a 35’ Radius including a compliant ADA ramp with By-Pass and Truncated Domes. City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. vi) Construct Commercial Driveway Approach per City Standard No. 204, Type II, including an accessible by-pass around the top of the drive approach. Minimum

Packet Pg.
577

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 20 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
Width is 26’. No Driveways closer than 100’ from BCR/ECR as directed by the City Engineer. MC12.28.060, MC12-28-100, MC15.04.230, MC16.20.030,

19.24.060, MC19.30.200, Ord. MC-1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-460, 5-15-85; Ord.

MC-320, 12-06-83; Ord. 3918, 2-25-80; Ord. 2519, 8-20-63; Ord. 1963, 11-18-52, Ord. MC-1531, 6-03-20, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. vii) Driveways in Commercial, Industrial, or multi-Family units, no gates shall be placed closer or impede 40’ from back of sidewalk, as directed by the Traffic Engineer.
viii) Construct 8" Curb and Gutter per City Standard No. 200, type “B”. City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy.
ix) Construct Sidewalk per City Standard No. 202; Case "A" (6’ wide adjacent to curb), M12.92.050, MC19.30.170, Ord. MC-1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-691, 12-19-89, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy.
x) An ADA Ramp shall be constructed at corner in accordance with the SPPWC (Standard Plans for Public Works Construction) or Caltrans Standard plans A88A.

Federal Highway – DIB82-04, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. xi) Remove Street Light from SCE Wooden Pole.
xii) Install LED Street Lights System adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard No’s. SL-1, SL-2, and SL-3. Also, when more than three (3) streetlights a separate street light plan sheet shall be submitted in accordance with the City of San Bernardino Street Lighting Design Policies. Install ID Plate on Street light pole.

Connect to Existing Street Light System.
xiii) Install type II Bike Lane per “Manual Uniform Traffic Control Devices - California”, as directed by the City Traffic Engineer, SBCTA (San Bernardino County Transportation Authority) Non-Motorized Transportation Plan rev. 2018. xiv) Underground existing poles, all utility line(s) including electrical under 34kv shall be underground and poles removed, MC19.20.030.28, MC19.30.110, City of San Bernardino Public Works - Street Improvement Policy.
xv) Install 2-3” Conduit 36” under the sidewalk with pull rope and pull boxes for future Traffic connections.
xvi) No Parking will be allowed on Highland Avenue, install signs per city standards. xvii) Survey Monuments and ties shall be placed, replaced, tied out and recorded at any corner or alignment changes that are adjacent to the project area in accordance with California Land Surveyors Association – Monument Preservation Guidelines, Copies of Recorded Monuments/Ties shall be delivered to Public Works/Engineering.
c) Cabrera Avenue – TI = 5.5: * - **
i) The street shall be rehabilitated to meet the requirements detailed in a soils report based on the “R” value of the subgrade and the Traffic Index. The City’s has a minimum standard for new streets (4” AC over 8” Base) except truck usage (9”AC over 12” Base); However, the Soils Report may indicate a thicker or different improvement.

Packet Pg.
578

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 21 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
ii) When Striping, all striping shall be thermoplastic paint per section 84 of the Caltrans specifications.
iii) The existing curb & gutter, sidewalk, and driveway fronting the site are in poor condition, the curb & gutter panels, sidewalk panels, and driveways shall be replaced per city standards. MC12.92.040, Ord. MC-1274, 7-22-08; Ord. MC- 1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-691, 12-19-89.
iv) The corner shall be a 35’ Radius including a compliant ADA ramp with By-Pass and Truncated Domes. City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. v) Construct Commercial Driveway Approach per City Standard No. 204, Type II, including an accessible by-pass around the top of the drive approach. Minimum Width is 26’. No Driveways closer than 100’ from BCR/ECR as directed by the City Engineer. MC12.28.060, MC12-28-100, MC15.04.230, MC16.20.030,

19.24.060, MC19.30.200, Ord. MC-1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-460, 5-15-85; Ord.

MC-320, 12-06-83; Ord. 3918, 2-25-80; Ord. 2519, 8-20-63; Ord. 1963, 11-18-52, Ord. MC-1531, 6-03-20, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. vi) Driveways in Commercial, Industrial, or multi-Family units, no gates shall be placed closer or impede 40’ from back of sidewalk, as directed by the Traffic Engineer.
vii) Construct 8" Curb and Gutter per City Standard No. 200, type “B”. City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy.
viii) Construct Sidewalk per City Standard No. 202; Case "A" (6’ wide adjacent to curb), M12.92.050, MC19.30.170, Ord. MC-1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-691, 12-19-89, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy.
ix) An ADA Ramp shall be constructed at corner in accordance with the SPPWC (Standard Plans for Public Works Construction) or Caltrans Standard plans A88A.

Federal Highway – DIB82-04, City of San Bernardino - Street Improvement Policy. x) Remove Street Light from SCE Wooden Pole.
xi) Existing Street Light System shall be replaced to LED (Head-Bulb) in accordance with City Standard Nos. SL-1, SL-2, and SL-3. Also, a separate light plan may be submitted in accordance with the City of San Bernardino Street Lighting Design Policies. Install ID Plate on Street light pole. As directed by the City Engineer. xii) No Parking will be allowed on Cabrera Avenue, install signs per city standards. xiii) Survey Monuments and ties shall be placed, replaced, tied out and recorded at any corner or alignment changes that are adjacent to the project area in accordance with California Land Surveyors Association – Monument Preservation Guidelines, Copies of Recorded Monuments/Ties shall be delivered to Public Works/Engineering.
These Conditions are set for an estimated construction with-in two years. If construction exceeds two years from DERC Approval these conditions shall be reviewed and updated as needed.

Packet Pg.
579

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 22 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
** If a Scoping Form is required, this form shall indicated the need of a Traffic Report, the results of the traffic report shall become conditions of this project which may increase or extend the above requirements in section 1(b) and 5(a). d) With Submittal of improvement plans including but not limited to grading plans, Street improvement plans, storm drain and retention/detention basin plans, and erosion/sediment control plans, The Applicant shall cause to be formed, or shall be annexed into an existing, Community Facilities District(s) (CFD) (2019-1 Maintenance) for landscaping, lighting, streets, drainage facilities, street sweeping, graffiti removal, or other infrastructure, as required by the City to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Applicant shall initiate the maintenance and benefit assessment district(s) formation, or annexation, by submitting a landowner petition and consent form (provided by the City) and deposited necessary fees concurrent with the application for street and grading plan review and approval; and said maintenance and benefit assessment district(s) shall be established concurrent with the approval of the final map in the case of the subdivision of land, or prior issuance of any certificate of occupancy where there is no subdivision of land, and as approved by the City Engineer.

Reso 2018-264, Reso 2019-178.
e) If a drainage report is required by Land Development, A second copy of the drainage report will be delivered to public works, if offsite or overflow storm drain systems are identified, all systems shall be identified on the street improvement plans, and public storm drain shall be on a separate set of plans.
f) A temporary construction encroachment permit from Public Works Department shall be required for utility cuts into existing streets or any work within City’s right-of-way.

Pavement restoration or trench repair shall be in conformance with City Standard No. 310. Public facilities shall be restored or constructed back to Public Works Department satisfaction.
g) Any pavement works affecting the traffic loop detectors shall be coordinated and subjected to Public Works Traffic Division requirements. h) The applicant must post a performance bond (Insurance, Deposit) prior to issuance of the off-site permit. The amount of the bond is to be determined by Public Works Department. MC12.03.110, Ord. MC-1027, 9-09-98; Ord. MC-1004, 10-21-97. i) The above conditions shall comply with current codes, policies, and standards at time of construction.
j) Prior to Certificate of Occupancy or Completion of Project all As-builts and Centerline Ties shall be submitted to Public Works.

54. Traffic Requirements
a) The applicant submitted a scope of study form and a vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) assessment. The scope was approved and will not require a traffic impact Analysis study, and the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) screening will not require a detailed screening analysis since the project lies in a Transit Priority Area.

55. Integrated Solid Waste Management

Packet Pg.
580

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 23 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
a) During demolition and/or construction, services are to be provided through the City of San Bernardino’s franchised hauler Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. b) The Site Plan identifies the development, establishment, and operation of a self-storage facility comprised of two new three-story buildings. The project site is located at 1534 W. Highland Avenue.
c) Burrtec Waste’s review of the Site Plan printed 9/20/22, identifies a single trash enclosure along the north property line northwest of Building 2. Usable enclosure dimensions are 12’x 12’. It is accessed by a 30-foot-wide driveway with a “T” intersection to the south that can be used for collection truck turnarounds. d) Based upon the information provided, the project meets or exceeds Burrtec minimum requirements for trash enclosure location and accessibility. Burrtec will therefore provide standard commercial collection services for trash and mixed recyclables. e) Any changes to the overall project design, enclosure specifications or location, or access may adversely impact Burrtec’s ability to service the project. Any design modifications that could impact Burrtec’s service will be subject to review and approval by Burrtec.
f) Burrtec’s review of this project is limited to determining whether it meets Burrtec’s minimum standards for waste and recycling collection services. Any comments or approvals by Burrtec are limited to these minimum standards as they relate to equipment and personnel and do not pertain to the project’s compliance with applicable federal, state, and local land use and environmental laws, building codes or other applicable government regulations. Any approvals by Burrtec do not warrant or represent that Burrtec accepts any liability relative to the performance of waste and recycling collection services within this project.
g) Construct at a minimum a City Standard Plan 508 Refuse Enclosure and meet or exceed the minimum 8’-0”x 15’-0” clear interior dimensions required for the container storage area.
h) Display the refuse enclosure’s interior dimensions on the Site Plan. i) If a potential tenant/business is involved in the production, manufacture, distribution, or sale of food products, participation in a food waste recycling program is required per Assembly Bill 1826. This will require additional space within refuse enclosures for food waste containers. Therefore, City Standard Plan 508 Refuse Enclosure interior dimensions may need to be modified (enlarged) to accommodate the following:

Trash – One 4 cubic yard container
Recycling – One 4 cubic yard container
Food Waste – One 2 cubic yard container
j) Food waste generators with low volume yields may contact the Public Works Department to inquire about the use of 65-gallon food waste barrels. Modified refuse enclosures shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, the Building and Safety Division, and Burrtec Waste.
k) Contact the Building & Safety Division to determine ADA accessibility requirements.

Modifications made to refuse enclosures to meet ADA accessibility requirements shall

Packet Pg.
581

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 24 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
not decrease the minimum clear interior dimensions needed for the container storage area.
l) Display clear drive aisle widths on the Site Plan.
m) Refuse enclosures within five (5) feet of combustible construction shall install an automatic fire sprinkler as approved by the Building & Safety Division and the San Bernardino County Fire Department. (See City Standard Plan 508). n) Refuse enclosure roofs shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet high interior at its lowest point, with minimal front protrusions that can be damaged during container servicing and must extend over any open side or the rear of the refuse enclosure by at least six (6) inches or as approved by the City.
o) Burrtec Waste Truck Turning Radius – All corners and intersections on streets and driveways leading to refuse enclosures shall have a turning radius adequate for a 35- foot long, three-axle collection truck. The minimum inside curb radius shall be at least 28 feet. The minimum outside curb radius shall be at least 42 feet. All streets and driveways shall comply with applicable City standards. Burrtec Waste’s truck turning template may be obtained from the Public Works Department in PDF and CAD. p) Vertical and Horizontal Clearances – The minimum vertical clearance for collection trucks along the entire route to the refuse enclosure is fifteen (15) feet. The minimum vertical clearance in front of the refuse enclosure where the truck will empty the container shall be twenty-six (26) feet. The clear height shall be free of building overhangs, trees, and utility lines. The minimum horizontal clearance along the entire route to an enclosure is 12 feet.
q) Hammerhead Turnarounds – Shall meet or exceed San Bernardino County Fire Protection District Diagram A-1.12: Hammerhead Turnaround Detail dated July 1, 2021. San Bernardino County Hammerhead detail may be obtained from the Public Works Department.
r) If gated, access shall be provided by means of a key, code, or remote. s) Assembly Bill 341 Mandatory Commercial Recycling may apply. t) Assembly Bill 1826 Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling may apply. u) Senate Bill 1383 Short-Lived Climate Pollutants Reduction Act may apply. v) Upon completion, service is provided through the City of San Bernardino’s franchised hauler Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. 111 E. Mill Street, San Bernardino, CA 92408 (909) 804-4222.

56. Required Engineering Plans
a) A complete submittal for plan checking shall consist of:
▪street improvement plans (may include streetlights or street lighting may be separate plan),
▪sewer plans (Private sewers may be shown on on-site improvement plan; public sewers must be on a separate plan with profile),
▪storm drain plans (Private storm drains may be shown on on-site improvement plans; public storm drains must be on a separate plan with profile),

Packet Pg.
582

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 25 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
▪signing and striping plan (may be on sheets included in street improvement plan), ▪lighting (on-site lighting may be included in on-site improvement plan or may be on a separate stand-alone plan),
▪grading (may be incorporated with on-site improvement plan and demolition plan), ▪on-site improvement plans and on-site landscaping and irrigation, ▪water plans (shall be submitted to San Bernardino Municipal Water Department), ▪other plans as required. Piecemeal submittal of various types of plans for the same project will not be allowed.
▪All required supporting calculations, studies and reports must be included in the initial submittal (including but not limited to drainage studies, soils reports, structural calculations)
b) All off-site improvement plans submitted for plan check shall be prepared on the City’s standard 24” x 36” sheets. A signature block (city standard block) satisfactory to the City Engineer or his designee can be found on the City Web Site http://www.sbcity.org/city_hall/public_works/engineering_division/engineering_deve lopment_resources Engineering conditions of the project shall be inserted in the last pages of the plans.
c) After completion of plan checking, final mylar drawings with city standard block, stamped and signed by the Registered Civil Engineer in charge, shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval.
d) Electronic files of all improvement plans/drawings shall be submitted to the City Engineer. The files shall be compatible with AutoCAD 2021 and include a .dxf file of the project. Files shall be on CD and shall be submitted at the same time the final mylar drawings are submitted for approval.
e) Copies of the City’s policies and procedures and standard drawings are available at the Public Works Counter for the cost of reproduction. They are also available at no charge at the Public Works Web Site at
http://www.sbcity.org/city_hall/public_works/engineering_division/design_policy_an d_procedure_documents

57. Required Engineering Permits
a) Grading and On-site improvements permit (LD).
b) WQMP/Hydrology (THR).
c) Off-site improvement construction permits. (E).
d) Traffic Control and Right-of-Way permit (ROW).
e) CFD/Street Dedication permit (RP).

58. Applicable Engineering Fees
a) All plan check, permit, inspection, and impact fees are outlined on the Public Works Fee Schedule. A deposit in the amount of 100% of the estimated checking fee for each set of plans will be required at time of application for plan check. The amount of the fee is subject

Packet Pg.
583

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 26 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0
to adjustment if the construction cost estimate varies more than 10% from the estimate submitted with the application for plan checking.
b) The current fee schedule is available at the Public Works Counter and at http://www.sbcity.org
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 7th day of June, 2023.

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Genoveva Rocha, CMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney

Packet Pg.
584

Resolution No. 2023-0079
Resolution No. 2023-079
June 7, 2023

Page 27 of 27 ends

2 7
0 0

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2023-079, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 7 th day of June 2023 by the following vote:

Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT

SANCHEZ
IBARRA

FIGUEROA

SHORETT

REYNOSO
CALVIN

ALEXANDER
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this __ day of ___ 2023.

Genoveva Rocha, CMC, City Clerk

Packet Pg.
585

Packet Pg.
586

∆
:+,*+/$1'$9(
&$%5(5$$9(
;
3523%$6,1
352326('
%/'*
))
352326('
%/'*))
3523%$6,1

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
6),*8(52$675((768,7(/26$1*(/(6&$

3+21(

:::.,0/(<+251&20
‹.,0/(<+251$1'$662&,$7(6,1&
/(*(1'
3$9(0(17/(*(1'
&216758&7,21127(6
1257+
352-(&77($0
6,7(,1)250$7,21
/(*$/'(6&5,37,21($6(0(17127(6

Packet Pg.
587

:$//7<3(*(1(5$/127(6
*(1(5$/127(6
.(<127(6
dKd>^&ϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮ
t
^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϲϰϱ

^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϯϮϳ
ϳϴ͕ϳϯϯ^&ͬϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮсϳϮ͘ϯй
KhEd
Ks
Z>>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϴϱ
Ϯ
ϲϮ
Ϯϯϲ
ϲϳ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϮϭϮϱ
ϭϰϬ
ϰϲϱϬ
ϮϯϲϬϬ
ϭϯϰϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ϭϲй
ϯϬй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ϯ ϳyϭϮ ϭϲϴ фϬϭй
dKd>͗ϴϬϲ ϳϴϳϯϯ ϭϬϬй
Ϯϯ ϭϬyϯϬ ϲϵϬϬ Ϭϵйϵ
Ϯϭϲ ϱyϭϬ ϭϬϴϬϬ ϭϰй
ϭϭϯ ϭϬyϭϱ ϭϲϵϱϬϳ Ϯϭй
KhEd
&/Z^d>
s
>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϭϮ
Ͳ
ϭϬ
ϭϳ
ϭϱ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϯϬϬ
Ͳ
ϳϱϬ
ϭϳϬϬ
ϯϬϬϬ
ϬϮй
Ͳ
Ϭϱй
ϭϯй
Ϯϯй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ͳ ϳyϭϮ Ͳ Ͳ
dKd>͗ϭϭϲ ϭϯϯϬϬ ϭϬϬй
ϵ ϭϬyϯϬ ϮϳϬϬ ϮϬйϵ
ϯϭ ϱyϭϬ ϭϱϱϬ ϭϮй
ϮϮ ϭϬyϭϱ ϯϯϬϬϳ Ϯϱй
фϬϭй

^dh/>/E'
Z
W
Zϭ^d>
s
>^& ϭϴ͕ϭϬϵ
KhEd

^dh/>/E'ͲhE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϱϰ
Ͳ
ϯϭ
ϭϬϲ
ϯϯ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϭϯϱϬ
Ͳ
ϮϯϮϱ
ϭϬϲϬϬ
ϲϲϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ͳ
Ϭϲй
Ϯϳй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
Ͳ ϳyϭϮ Ͳ
dKd>͗ϰϭϱ ϯϵϲϳϱ ϭϬϬй
ϵ ϭϬyϯϬ ϮϳϬϬ Ϭϳйϵ
ϭϭϮ ϱyϭϬ ϱϲϬϬ ϭϰй
ϳϬ ϭϬyϭϱ ϭϬϱϬϬ Ϯϲй
Ͳ
),567/(9(/)/2253/$1($67%8,/',1*  

.(<3/$1
ϴ
ϳ
&+(&.('

352-(&712

'$7(

5(9,6,216
12 '$7( 5(0$5.6
'5$:1

6($/

6$)6725
:(67+,*+/$1'$9(
6$1%(51$5',12&$

'$9,'%2<&(
$5&+,7(&7
(&(175$/3.:<67(
$/7$0217(635,1*6)/

7+,6'2&80(17,6127

$
),567/(9(/)/2253/$1
.:7*
3 ?6?6DI6WRU?6$)6WRU:HVW+LJKODQG$YH6DQ%HUQDUGLQR&$?&$' 'UDZLQJV?&RQVWUXFWLRQ'RFXPHQWV?&'(DVW%XLOGLQJ?B$)LUVW/HYHO)ORRU3ODQ(DVW%XLOGLQJGZJ$),567/(9(/)/2253/$1 
$0NHYZDW':*7R3')SF$5&+(
[,QFKHV



Packet Pg.
588

:$//7<3(*(1(5$/127(6
*(1(5$/127(6
.(<127(6

6(&21'/(9(/)/2253/$1($67%8,/',1*  

dKd>^&ϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮ
t
^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϲϰϱ

^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϯϮϳ
ϳϴ͕ϳϯϯ^&ͬϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮсϳϮ͘ϯй
KhEd
Ks
Z>>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϴϱ
Ϯ
ϲϮ
Ϯϯϲ
ϲϳ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϮϭϮϱ
ϭϰϬ
ϰϲϱϬ
ϮϯϲϬϬ
ϭϯϰϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ϭϲй
ϯϬй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ϯ ϳyϭϮ ϭϲϴ фϬϭй
dKd>͗ϴϬϲ ϳϴϳϯϯ ϭϬϬй
Ϯϯ ϭϬyϯϬ ϲϵϬϬ Ϭϵйϵ
Ϯϭϲ ϱyϭϬ ϭϬϴϬϬ ϭϰй
ϭϭϯ ϭϬyϭϱ ϭϲϵϱϬϳ Ϯϭй
KhEd
^
KE>
s
>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
Ϯϲ
Ͳ
ϭϬ
ϰϬ
ϵ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϲϱϬ
Ͳ
ϳϱϬ
ϰϬϬϬ
ϭϴϬϬ
Ϭϱй
Ͳ
Ϭϲй
ϯϬй
ϭϯй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ͳ ϳyϭϮ Ͳ Ͳ
dKd>͗ϭϰϱ ϭϯϰϬϬ ϭϬϬй
Ͳ ϭϬyϯϬ Ͳ Ͳϵ
Ϯϴ ϱyϭϬ ϭϰϬϬ ϭϬй
ϯϮ ϭϬyϭϱ ϰϴϬϬϳ ϯϲй
фϬϭй

^dh/>/E'
Z
W
ZϮE>
s
>^& ϭϴ͕ϭϬϵ
KhEd

^dh/>/E'ͲhE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϱϰ
Ͳ
ϯϭ
ϭϬϲ
ϯϯ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϭϯϱϬ
Ͳ
ϮϯϮϱ
ϭϬϲϬϬ
ϲϲϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ͳ
Ϭϲй
Ϯϳй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ͳ ϳyϭϮ Ͳ
dKd>͗ϰϭϱ ϯϵϲϳϱ ϭϬϬй
ϵ ϭϬyϯϬ ϮϳϬϬ Ϭϳйϵ
ϭϭϮ ϱyϭϬ ϱϲϬϬ ϭϰй
ϳϬ ϭϬyϭϱ ϭϬϱϬϬϳ Ϯϲй
Ͳ
.(<3/$1
&+(&.('

352-(&712

'$7(

5(9,6,216
12 '$7( 5(0$5.6
'5$:1

6($/

6$)6725
:(67+,*+/$1'$9(
6$1%(51$5',12&$

'$9,'%2<&(
$5&+,7(&7
(&(175$/3.:<67(
$/7$0217(635,1*6)/

7+,6'2&80(17,6127

$
6(&21'/(9(/)/2253/$1
.:7*
3 ?6?6DI6WRU?6$)6WRU:HVW+LJKODQG$YH6DQ%HUQDUGLQR&$?&$' 'UDZLQJV?&RQVWUXFWLRQ'RFXPHQWV?&'(DVW%XLOGLQJ?B$6HFRQG/HYHO)ORRU3ODQ(DVW%XLOGLQJGZJ$6(&21'/(9(/)/2253/$1 

$0NHYZDW':*7R3')SF$5&+(
[,QFKHV



Packet Pg.
589

:$//7<3(*(1(5$/127(6
*(1(5$/127(6
.(<127(6

7+,5'/(9(/)/2253/$1($67%8,/',1*  

dKd>^&ϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮ
t
^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϲϰϱ

^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϯϮϳ
ϳϴ͕ϳϯϯ^&ͬϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮсϳϮ͘ϯй
KhEd
Ks
Z>>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϴϱ
Ϯ
ϲϮ
Ϯϯϲ
ϲϳ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϮϭϮϱ
ϭϰϬ
ϰϲϱϬ
ϮϯϲϬϬ
ϭϯϰϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ϭϲй
ϯϬй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ϯ ϳyϭϮ ϭϲϴ фϬϭй
dKd>͗ϴϬϲ ϳϴϳϯϯ ϭϬϬй
Ϯϯ ϭϬyϯϬ ϲϵϬϬ Ϭϵйϵ
Ϯϭϲ ϱyϭϬ ϭϬϴϬϬ ϭϰй
ϭϭϯ ϭϬyϭϱ ϭϲϵϱϬϳ Ϯϭй
KhEd
d,/Z>
s
>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϭϲ
Ͳ
ϭϭ
ϰϵ
ϵ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϰϬϬ
Ͳ
ϴϮϱ
ϰϵϬϬ
ϭϴϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ͳ
Ϭϳй
ϯϴй
ϭϰй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϳ
Ͳ ϳyϭϮ Ͳ Ͳ
dKd>͗ϭϱϰ ϭϮϵϳϱ ϭϬϬй
Ͳ ϭϬyϯϬ Ͳ Ͳϵ
ϱϯ ϱyϭϬ ϮϲϱϬ ϮϬй
ϭϲ ϭϬyϭϱ ϮϰϬϬϲ ϭϴй
фϬϭй

^dh/>/E'
Z
W
ZϯZ>
s
>^& ϭϴ͕ϭϬϵ
KhEd

^dh/>/E'ͲhE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϱϰ
Ͳ
ϯϭ
ϭϬϲ
ϯϯ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϭϯϱϬ
Ͳ
ϮϯϮϱ
ϭϬϲϬϬ
ϲϲϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ͳ
Ϭϲй
Ϯϳй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϳ
Ͳ ϳyϭϮ Ͳ
dKd>͗ϰϭϱ ϯϵϲϳϱ ϭϬϬй
ϵ ϭϬyϯϬ ϮϳϬϬ Ϭϳйϵ
ϭϭϮ ϱyϭϬ ϱϲϬϬ ϭϰй
ϳϬ ϭϬyϭϱ ϭϬϱϬϬϲ Ϯϲй
Ͳ
.(<3/$1
&+(&.('

352-(&712

'$7(

5(9,6,216
12 '$7( 5(0$5.6
'5$:1

6($/

6$)6725
:(67+,*+/$1'$9(
6$1%(51$5',12&$

'$9,'%2<&(
$5&+,7(&7
(&(175$/3.:<67(
$/7$0217(635,1*6)/

7+,6'2&80(17,6127

$
7+,5'/(9(/)/2253/$1
.:7*
3 ?6?6DI6WRU?6$)6WRU:HVW+LJKODQG$YH6DQ%HUQDUGLQR&$?&$' 'UDZLQJV?&RQVWUXFWLRQ'RFXPHQWV?&'(DVW%XLOGLQJ?B$7KLUG/HYHO)ORRU3ODQ(DVW%XLOGLQJGZJ$7+,5'/(9(/)/2253/$1 
$0NHYZDW':*7R3')SF$5&+(
[,QFKHV



Packet Pg.
590

:$//7<3(*(1(5$/127(6
*(1(5$/127(6
.(<127(6

),567/(9(/)/2253/$1:(67%8,/',1*  

dKd>^&ϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮ
t
^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϲϰϱ

^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϯϮϳ
K&&/
ͬ>Kz^&ϵϬϵ
ϳϴ͕ϳϯϯ^&ͬϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮсϳϮ͘ϯй
KhEd
Ks
Z>>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϴϱ
Ϯ
ϲϮ
Ϯϯϲ
ϲϳ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϮϭϮϱ
ϭϰϬ
ϰϲϱϬ
ϮϯϲϬϬ
ϭϯϰϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ϭϲй
ϯϬй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ϯ ϳyϭϮ ϭϲϴ фϬϭй
dKd>͗ϴϬϲ ϳϴϳϯϯ ϭϬϬй
Ϯϯ ϭϬyϯϬ ϲϵϬϬ Ϭϵйϵ
Ϯϭϲ ϱyϭϬ ϭϬϴϬϬ ϭϰй
ϭϭϯ ϭϬyϭϱ ϭϲϵϱϬϳ Ϯϭй
KhEd
&/Z^d>
s
>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϰ
Ͳ
ϲ
ϯϳ
ϭϰ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϭϬϬ
Ͳ
ϰϱϬ
ϯϳϬϬ
ϮϴϬϬ
Ϭϭй
Ͳ
Ϭϰй
Ϯϵй
ϮϮй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ͳ ϳyϭϮ Ͳ Ͳ
dKd>͗ϭϬϮ ϭϮϳϬϬ ϭϬϬй
ϭϰ ϭϬyϯϬ ϰϮϬϬ ϯϯйϵ
Ϯϲ ϱyϭϬ ϭϯϬϬ ϭϬй
ϭ ϭϬyϭϱ ϭϱϬϳ Ϭϭй
фϬϭй
t
^dh/>/E'
Z
W
Zϭ^d>
s
>^& ϭϴ͕Ϯϭϱ
KhEd
t
^dh/>/E'ͲhE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϯϭ
Ϯ
ϯϭ
ϭϯϬ
ϯϰ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϳϳϱ
ϭϰϬ
ϮϯϮϱ
ϭϯϬϬϬ
ϲϴϬϬ
ϬϮй
фϬϭй
Ϭϳй
ϯϯй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϳ
Ϯ ϳyϭϮ ϭϲϴ
dKd>͗ϯϵϭ ϯϵϬϱϴ ϭϬϬй
ϭϰ ϭϬyϯϬ ϰϮϬϬ ϭϭйϵ
ϭϬϰ ϱyϭϬ ϱϮϬϬ ϭϯй
ϰϯ ϭϬyϭϱ ϲϰϱϬ ϭϳй
фϬϭй
ϴ
.(<3/$1
&+(&.('

352-(&712

'$7(

5(9,6,216
12 '$7( 5(0$5.6
'5$:1

6($/

6$)6725
:(67+,*+/$1'$9(
6$1%(51$5',12&$

'$9,'%2<&(
$5&+,7(&7
(&(175$/3.:<67(
$/7$0217(635,1*6)/

7+,6'2&80(17,6127

$
),567/(9(/)/2253/$1
.:7*
3 ?6?6DI6WRU?6$)6WRU:HVW+LJKODQG$YH6DQ%HUQDUGLQR&$?&$' 'UDZLQJV?&RQVWUXFWLRQ'RFXPHQWV?&':HVW%XLOGLQJ?B$)LUVW/HYHO)ORRU3ODQ:HVW%XLOGLQJGZJ$),567/(9(/)/2253/$1 

$0NHYZDW':*7R3')SF$5&+(
[,QFKHV



Packet Pg.
591

:$//7<3(*(1(5$/127(6
*(1(5$/127(6
.(<127(6

6(&21'/(9(/)/2253/$1:(67%8,/',1*  

dKd>^&ϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮ
t
^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϲϰϱ

^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϯϮϳ
ϳϴ͕ϳϯϯ^&ͬϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮсϳϮ͘ϯй
KhEd
Ks
Z>>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϴϱ
Ϯ
ϲϮ
Ϯϯϲ
ϲϳ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϮϭϮϱ
ϭϰϬ
ϰϲϱϬ
ϮϯϲϬϬ
ϭϯϰϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ϭϲй
ϯϬй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ϯ ϳyϭϮ ϭϲϴ фϬϭй
dKd>͗ϴϬϲ ϳϴϳϯϯ ϭϬϬй
Ϯϯ ϭϬyϯϬ ϲϵϬϬ Ϭϵйϵ
Ϯϭϲ ϱyϭϬ ϭϬϴϬϬ ϭϰй
ϭϭϯ ϭϬyϭϱ ϭϲϵϱϬϳ Ϯϭй
KhEd
^
KE>
s
>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϭϲ
ϭ
ϭϴ
ϰϯ
ϭϬ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϰϬϬ
ϳϬ
ϭϯϱϬ
ϰϯϬϬ
ϮϬϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ϭϭй
ϭϬй
ϯϮй
ϭϱй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
ϭ ϳyϭϮ ϴϰ
dKd>͗ϭϰϲ ϭϯϭϱϰ ϭϬϬй
Ͳ ϭϬyϯϬ Ͳ Ͳϵ
ϯϲ ϱyϭϬ ϭϴϬϬ ϭϰй
Ϯϭ ϭϬyϭϱ ϯϭϱϬϳ Ϯϰй
фϬϭй
t
^dh/>/E'
Z
W
ZϮE>
s
>^& ϭϴ͕Ϯϭϱ
Ϭϭй
KhEd
t
^dh/>/E'ͲhE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϯϭ
Ϯ
ϯϭ
ϭϯϬ
ϯϰ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϳϳϱ
ϭϰϬ
ϮϯϮϱ
ϭϯϬϬϬ
ϲϴϬϬ
ϬϮй
фϬϭй
Ϭϳй
ϯϯй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ϯ ϳyϭϮ ϭϲϴ
dKd>͗ϯϵϭ ϯϵϬϱϴ ϭϬϬй
ϭϰ ϭϬyϯϬ ϰϮϬϬ ϭϭйϵ
ϭϬϰ ϱyϭϬ ϱϮϬϬ ϭϯй
ϰϯ ϭϬyϭϱ ϲϰϱϬϳ ϭϳй
фϬϭй
.(<3/$1
&+(&.('

352-(&712

'$7(

5(9,6,216
12 '$7( 5(0$5.6
'5$:1

6($/

6$)6725
:(67+,*+/$1'$9(
6$1%(51$5',12&$

'$9,'%2<&(
$5&+,7(&7
(&(175$/3.:<67(
$/7$0217(635,1*6)/

7+,6'2&80(17,6127

$
6(&21'/(9(/)/2253/$1
.:7*
3 ?6?6DI6WRU?6$)6WRU:HVW+LJKODQG$YH6DQ%HUQDUGLQR&$?&$' 'UDZLQJV?&RQVWUXFWLRQ'RFXPHQWV?&':HVW%XLOGLQJ?B$6HFRQG/HYHO)ORRU3ODQ:HVW%XLOGLQJGZJ$6(&21'/(9(/)/2253/$1 
$0NHYZDW':*7R3')SF$5&+(
[,QFKHV



Packet Pg.
592

:$//7<3(*(1(5$/127(6
*(1(5$/127(6
.(<127(6

7+,5'/(9(/)/2253/$1:(67%8,/',1*  

dKd>^&ϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮ
t
^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϲϰϱ

^dh/>/E'^& ϱϰ͕ϯϮϳ
ϳϴ͕ϳϯϯ^&ͬϭϬϴ͕ϵϳϮсϳϮ͘ϯй
KhEd
Ks
Z>>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϴϱ
Ϯ
ϲϮ
Ϯϯϲ
ϲϳ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϮϭϮϱ
ϭϰϬ
ϰϲϱϬ
ϮϯϲϬϬ
ϭϯϰϬϬ
Ϭϯй
Ϭϲй
ϯϬй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ϯ ϳyϭϮ ϭϲϴ фϬϭй
dKd>͗ϴϬϲ ϳϴϳϯϯ ϭϬϬй
Ϯϯ ϭϬyϯϬ ϲϵϬϬ Ϭϵйϵ
Ϯϭϲ ϱyϭϬ ϭϬϴϬϬ ϭϰй
ϭϭϯ ϭϬyϭϱ ϭϲϵϱϬϳ Ϯϭй
KhEd
d,/Z>
s
>hE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϭϭ
ϭ
ϳ
ϱϬ
ϭϬ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
Ϯϳϱ
ϳϬ
ϱϮϱ
ϱϬϬϬ
ϮϬϬϬ
ϬϮй
фϬϭй
Ϭϰй
ϯϴй
ϭϱй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
ϭ ϳyϭϮ ϴϰ
dKd>͗ϭϰϯ ϭϯϮϬϰ ϭϬϬй
Ͳ ϭϬyϯϬ Ͳ Ͳϵ
ϰϮ ϱyϭϬ ϮϭϬϬ ϭϲй
Ϯϭ ϭϬyϭϱ ϯϭϱϬϳ Ϯϰй
фϬϭй
t
^dh/>/E'
Z
W
ZϯZ>
s
>^& ϭϴ͕Ϯϭϱ
Ϭϭй
KhEd
t
^dh/>/E'ͲhE/dD/y^,
h>

hE/ddzW
Z
Ed>

Z
 W
Z
Ed
ϯϭ
Ϯ
ϯϭ
ϭϯϬ
ϯϰ
ϱyϱ
ϳyϭϬ
ϳ͘ϱyϭϬ
ϭϬyϭϬ
ϭϬyϮϬ
ϳϳϱ
ϭϰϬ
ϮϯϮϱ
ϭϯϬϬϬ
ϲϴϬϬ
ϬϮй
фϬϭй
Ϭϳй
ϯϯй
ϭϳй
hE/d
ϭ
Ϯ
ϯ
ϰ
ϱ
ϲ
ϴ
Ϯ ϳyϭϮ ϭϲϴ
dKd>͗ϯϵϭ ϯϵϬϱϴ ϭϬϬй
ϭϰ ϭϬyϯϬ ϰϮϬϬ ϭϭйϵ
ϭϬϰ ϱyϭϬ ϱϮϬϬ ϭϯй
ϰϯ ϭϬyϭϱ ϲϰϱϬϳ ϭϳй
фϬϭй
.(<3/$1
&+(&.('

352-(&712

'$7(

5(9,6,216
12 '$7( 5(0$5.6
'5$:1

6($/

6$)6725
:(67+,*+/$1'$9(
6$1%(51$5',12&$

'$9,'%2<&(
$5&+,7(&7
(&(175$/3.:<67(
$/7$0217(635,1*6)/

7+,6'2&80(17,6127

$
7+,5'/(9(/)/2253/$1
.:7*
3 ?6?6DI6WRU?6$)6WRU:HVW+LJKODQG$YH6DQ%HUQDUGLQR&$?&$' 'UDZLQJV?&RQVWUXFWLRQ'RFXPHQWV?&':HVW%XLOGLQJ?B$7KLUG/HYHO)ORRU3ODQ:HVW%XLOGLQJGZJ$7+,5'/(9(/)/2253/$1 
$0NHYZDW':*7R3')SF$5&+(
[,QFKHV



Packet Pg.
593

Packet Pg.
594

Packet Pg.
595

Packet Pg.
596

Packet Pg.
597

Packet Pg.
598

;
352326('
%/'*
))
3523%$6,1
:+,*+/$1'$9(
&$%5(5$$9(
3523%$6,1
352326('
%/'*))

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
6),*8(52$675((768,7(/26$1*(/(6&$

3+21(

:::.,0/(<+251&20
‹.,0/(<+251$1'$662&,$7(6,1&
(;,67,1*87,/,7<127(
1257+
/(*(1'
(67,0$7('($57+:25.48$17,7,(6
($6(0(17127(6
*5$',1*127(6

Packet Pg.
599

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
6),*8(52$675((768,7(/26$1*(/(6&$

3+21(

:::.,0/(<+251&20
‹.,0/(<+251$1'$662&,$7(6,1&
 

&$%5(5$$9(:+,*+/$1'$9(

Packet Pg.
600

:+,*+/$1'$9(
&$%5(5$$9(

&75/6&5,%(;


&75/6&5,%(;


,1,3776%&,7<


&75/6&5,%(;
6&$/(   
1 6
(:
;
?3URMHFWV??6$)6WRU:HVW+LJKODQG6DQ%HUQDUGLQR&$?'HVLJQ?&RQVWUXFWLRQ?/DQGVFDSH?6$)6WRU+LJKODQG/DQGVFDSHGZJ 

$0SDUJR
5(9,6,216
'$7(

&200(17'$7(
$
              
%
&
'
(
)
*
+
,
-
.
/

35(/,0,1$5<
/$1'6&$3(3/$1
/

&836XEPLWWDO



 &8368%0,77$/&200(176
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6$)6WRU+,*+/$1'
6$1%(51$5',12&$
:+,*+/$1'$9(18($&5(6
PLANT_SCHEDULE

Packet Pg.
601

Appeal for Conditional Use Permit 22-13 and Minor
Exception 22-04
Presented by Elizabeth Mora-Rodriguez, Senior Planner
Community, Housing, and Economic Development Department

Packet Pg.
602

Proposed Project:
 A self-storage facility comprised of two (2) multi-story buildings containing a total of approximately 109,000 square feet  10% increase in building height from 30 feet to 33 feet  1534 W. Highland Avenue
 2.43 acres
 Commercial General (CG-1) zone

Packet Pg.
603

Aerial Map:

PROJECT SITE

Packet Pg.
604

Site Plan:

Packet Pg.
605

Rendering:

Packet Pg.
606

Background:
 January 10, 2023, the motion failed due to lack of majority  January 25, 2023, Applicant file Application for Appeal 23-02  Due to delays in ratification of denial, Application for Appeal 23-02 was deferred  Due to no comments expressed for opposition of subdivision to consolidate parcels, but instead focused on opposition to the land use, staff prepared 2 Resolutions with 2 independent actions
 March 14, 2023, Planning Commission took 2 actions:
1) Adopted Resolution 2023-012-PC approving Subdivision 22-08 2) Adopted Resolution 2023-006-PC denying Conditional Use Permit 22-12 and Minor Exception 22-04
 April 4, 2023, the applicant submitted a letter revising Appeal 23-02

Packet Pg.
607

Planning Commission Denial:

Planning Commissioner’s expressed land use concerns:
 The proposed land use will create a saturation of similar non-retail uses on a major commercial retail corridor;
 The proposed land use is not compatible with retail uses located on a major commercial retail corridor; and
 The proposed land use design and architecture is industrial in nature and not compatible with commercial retail uses located along a major commercial retail corridor.

Packet Pg.
608

Appeal Request:

Specific grounds for the Application for Appeal 23-02 are summarized as follows:
 The Project is consistent with the City’s Development Code and General Plan Goals and Policies and will be catalyst for future development projects.  SAFStor is Investing in the community where there is demand for modern climate-controlled storage facilities that will set high standard for additional new development on Highland Avenue.
 The Facility will be a modern, state-of-the-art development project that will foster additional development interest to the area.
 SAFStor Partners with the Community to provide storage units to those in need.

Packet Pg.
609

Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution denying Appeal 23-02, thereby upholding the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 22-13 and Minor Exception 22-04
or
Adopt a Resolution approving Appeal 23-02 of the Planning Commission’s denial, thereby approving Conditional Use Permit 22-13 and Minor Exception 22-04
The Mayor and City Council:

1. 2.

Packet Pg.
610

This space for filing stamp only

OR#:

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R

~ SINCE 1921 ~

600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841

PROOF OF PUBLICATION

(2015.5 C.C.P.)

State of California )
County
of Orange
) ss
Notice Type:

Ad Description:

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in
any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:

Executed on: 10/10/2004
At Riverside, California
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signature

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN
473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408
(909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536
SB 3702759
Jessica Nametz

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/DEVELOPMENT SER
300 NORTH D ST #300
SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92418

HRG - NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL MCC 6.7.23
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SAN BERNARDINO, county of SAN BERNARDINO, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, under date 06/27/1952, Case No. 73081. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
05/25/2023
05/25/2023

SAN BERNARDINO
!A000006320114!
Email

NO T ICE O F PUBLIC HEA RING

BEF ORE THE MAY OR AND

CITY COUN CIL
Not ice is he reby given that the City
of San Be rnard ino Mayor and City
Coun cil will hold a public hearing on
We dnesd ay, June 7, 2023 at 7:00
p.m. in the Feldheym P ublic
Libra ry, Bing Wong Auditorium , 555
W. 6 th Street, San Bernar dino,
California 92410 , on the following
item(s):

AP PEAL 23 -01 FOR
CON DIT IONAL U SE P ER MIT 21 -
18 AN D PUB LIC CONVE NIEN CE
OR N ECESS ITY LETTER 21 -07 - A
request to allow the develo pme nt,
establishment, and oper ation of a
mar ket wi th an Alcoholic Bev erag e
Control Type 21 (Off -Sale Genera l)
License within an existing bu ilding
conta ining appr oxim ately 2,024
square feet on a parcel containing
appro ximatel y 0.45 acr es. T he
project siteislocated at 1820 West 5 th
Street between N . Medic al Center
Drive and N. Rancho Avenue, Wa rd

1. En vironmental Deter min ation:

Statutorily E xem pt, purs uan t to
Section 15270 (Projects Which Are
Di sappr oved) of the State CEQA
Gu ideline s.

Applicant: Fern ando Castro
Ow ner: Z ho u Hu i
AP PEAL 23 -02 FOR
CON DIT IONAL U SE P ER MIT 22 -
12,AND MINOR E XCE PTION 22 -
04 -- - A reque st to allow the
dev elop ment of, establishm en t, an d
operation of a self -storage facility
comp rised of two (2)mult i -story
buildings containing a total of
appro ximatel y 109,000 square feet,
and appro ve a t en (10) perce nt
increase in building height from
thirty (30)feet to thirty (33)feet.

The project site is located at 15 34 W.

Hi gh land Aven ue (APN : 01 48 -1 74 -04,
10 , 11, and 1 5 throu gh 1 8),w ithin the
Commer cial General (CG -1) zone.

War d 6
En vironmental Det ermin ation:

Pursuant to Section 15270(a)of the
CEQA Guide lines, ‘‘ CE QA does no t
appl y to pro jects which a public
agen cy rejects or disapproves. ’’
Categorically Exem pt, pursuant to
Section 153 32(In -Fill Devel opme nt
Proj ects) of the State CEQA
Gu ideline s.

Ap plicant: SAF Stor R eal Estate Co,
LL C
Ow ner: Annabi, Wil liam N & Nellie
N Living Trust
The Mayor and City Council of the
City of San Bernardino w elcome s
you r par ticipation in eva luating
these items. The M ayor and City
Counc ilwill rev iew the proposal an d
wi ll consider the pro posed
env ironmental determ ination in

Packet Pg.
611

maki ng its decisions. The pub lic is
welco me to speak at the public
hea ring or to submit written
com m ents prior to the hearin g. For
more informa tion, please contac t
the City Clerk'sOffice by phone at
(909)384 -5002.

If you challenge the resultant action
of the Mayor and City Coun cil in
court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someo ne
else raised at the public h earin g
described in thisnotice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City
Plan ning Division at, or prior to,the
publ ic hearing.
5/25/23
SBS -3702759#

Packet Pg.
612

1 3
6 9

PUBLIC HEARING
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: June 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Charles E. McNeely, Interim City Manager
Barbara Whitehorn, Agency Director of Administrative Services Department: Finance
Subject: Presentation of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan (All
Wards)
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of San Bernardino, California:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing on the proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan;

2. Receive and file the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating and Capital Improvement Plan presentation and provide direction to staff.

Background
Section 701 of the City Charter provides that the City Manager shall prepare and submit a proposed budget to the Mayor and City Council for the ensuing fiscal year (FY). The budget provides a financial plan of all the City funds and activities for the upcoming fiscal year and includes a multi-year capital plan.

On June 1, 2022, the Mayor and City Council adopted the City of San Bernardino’s Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2023 and Fiscal Year 2024. For FY 2023, the adopted total estimated revenue amounts were $266,090,134, and the total adopted estimated expenditure amounts were $241,627,560.

Of this budget, the total FY 2023 General Fund revenues and expenditures were adopted in the amounts of $189,997,956 and $187,538,828, respectively. For Fiscal Year 2024, the total estimated revenue amounts were $270,830,032, and the total adopted estimated expenditure amounts were $247,926,640. Of this budget, the total FY 2024 General Fund revenues and expenditures were adopted in the amounts of $193,203,706 and $191,921,761, respectively. The total adopted appropriations in the CIP budget were $51,996,101. All details regarding the adopted budgets can be found in the online budget document: City of San Bernardino's Fiscal Year 2023 & Fiscal Year 2024 Interactive Budget Book.

Packet Pg.
613

1 3
6 9
On December 7, 2022, the Fiscal Year 2022-23 First Quarter update was presented to the Mayor and City Council with the staff recommendation for the following: approve a budget amendment to the FY 2022/23 Operating Budget by $2,088,110; allocate $1,000,000 of Measure S funds for the Investment Playbook; appropriate $59,000 in CDBG funds for equipment and services; and allocate $20,150,000 of American Rescue Plan Act funds for the Housing Initiative and Navigation Center, and temporary housing for American Sports University tenants. The $2,088,110 amendment to the General Fund authorized $1,080,570 in equipment and services throughout the City and $1,007,540 in personnel with the authorization of 23 full-time employees (FTEs). City Council modified staff’s request with six (6) additional maintenance workers in Public Works to assist with maintenance and cleaning work throughout the City, for a total of twelve (12) maintenance workers. This brought the total FTE requests to 29 positions. The $250,000 request within Public Works for consultant services was modified and reallocated $125,000 to staff training and $125,000 for consultant services. These modifications brought the total to $2,394,949. The Investment Playbook was modified to receive an allocation of $1,000,000 annually for three (3) years subject to Mayor and City Council approval each year, quarterly reports of accomplishments, and semi-annual workshops specific to the Nerve Center.

On March 1, 2023, the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Mid-Year Update was presented to the Mayor and City Council with a staff recommendation to approve a budget amendment of $5,914,730 for the FY 2022-23 Operating Budget. $5,330,060 of this amendment was recommended for the replacement of city-wide systems that are nearing end-of-life, additions to storage devices that are approaching total capacity, outdated and obsolete systems, funding for increases in utility costs, and ongoing costs for outside specialized legal counsel and liability claims. The remaining $584,670 encompassed the addition of 6 FTEs and the General Fund portion of the Housing Division’s personnel expenses to comply with the CDBG allowable administration percentage.

A budget workshop was held on May 9, 2023, with the Mayor and City Council to gather feedback from the Council regarding the proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget.

This workshop delivered an overview of anticipated revenues and expenditures and additions to the proposed budget. Concurrently, discussions were held with departments to further refine financial forecasts before publishing the proposed budget.

As required in the City Charter, this public hearing is held to present the proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 Operating and Capital Improvement Plan to provide an additional opportunity for open discussion and direction. Moreover, tonight’s public hearing was also publicly advertised in the San Bernardino County Sun (Attachment 2) as part of tonight’s City Council meeting.

Discussion
The Proposed Budget contains a review of the estimated available resources and the recommended allocation of these resources. Over the last year, the City has focused on restoring and enhancing service levels to provide better customer service within the

Packet Pg.
614

1 3
6 9
organization and the community. The original adopted Fiscal Year 2023 & Fiscal Year 2024 budgets met the identified ongoing operational needs of the departments and the community through the budget development process. This mid-cycle review allows for the second half of the budget to be updated appropriately, both with any ongoing costs committed to in Year 1 that need to be built into Year 2, as well as an opportunity to build in additional priorities of the Mayor and City Council, departments, and the community if there is financial capacity to do so.

Operating Budget
The Proposed Operating Budget reflects a projected $208,349,947 (a) in General Fund revenues and $200,758,027 (b) in General Fund expenditures for FY 2023-24. The proposed budget anticipates a surplus of $7,591,920 (c). The 10% Economic Contingency Reserve is $20,075,803 (d), and the 15% Emergency Reserve is $30,113,704 (e), which maintains the required funding for reserves as stated in the General Fund Reserve Policy.

These reserves are calculated based on the proposed General Fund budgeted expenditure amount. In addition to the Emergency and Economic Contingency Reserve, a couple of additional reserves have been set aside for FY 2023-24. $3,539,363 (f) has been set aside as a Strategic Initiative Reserve and $9,000,000 (g) has been reserved for a Capital Contingency Reserve, leaving $1,084,736 (h) Unassigned Fund Balance. The details for the assignment of the Strategic Initiative Reserve will be brought forward to the Mayor and City Council as part of a city-wide workshop. This forecast of revenues and expenditures are subject to changes depending on economic conditions; City staff will continue to monitor economic trends with reasonable and cautious revenue forecasts.

The breakdown of the General Fund Balance is in the table below, with each fund balance described in detail following the table.

Packet Pg.
615

1 3
6 9
Fund Balances
Non-Spendable Fund Balance
This balance includes amounts that cannot be spent because they are either not spendable in physical form (such as inventory) or legally or contractually required to be maintained intact (such as endowments).

Restricted Fund Balance
This balance includes amounts that can be spent only for specific purposes imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments or through enabling legislation.

General Fund Balance, 6/30/2022 97,036,479$
Measure S, 6/30/2022 57,201,940
TOTAL Fund Balance, 6/30/2022 154,238,419$
"Non-Spendable" (40,204,687)
"Spendable" as of 6/30/2022 114,033,732$
FY 2022/23 Total Revenue Forecast 204,973,581
FY 2022/23 Total Expenditure Forecast (199,535,945)
Anticipated Increase/(Decrease) to Fund Balance 5,437,636$ Anticipated "Spendable" as of 6/30/2023 119,471,368$
Categories of "Spendable" Fund Balance:

Restricted, Committed, and Assigned 62,797,125
10% Emergency Reserve 20,075,803 (d)
15% Economic Contingency Reserve 30,113,704 (e)
Capital Contingency Reserve 5,400,000
Unassigned Fund Balance, forecast 6/30/2023 1,084,736 (h) 119,471,368$
FY 2023/24 Budgeted Revenues 208,349,947 (a)
FY 2023/24 Budgeted Expenditures (200,758,027) (b)
Anticipated Increase/(Decrease) to Fund Balance 7,591,920$ (c) Additional Reserves, FY 2023/24:

Strategic Initiative Reserve 3,539,363$ (f)
Capital Contingency Reserve 3,600,000$
TOTAL Capital Contingency Reserve, FY 2023/24 9,000,000$ (g) FY 2023/24
FY 2022/23
FY 2021/22

Packet Pg.
616

1 3
6 9
General Fund Reserves
On November 21, 2018, the Mayor and City Council adopted the General Fund Reserve Policy, setting a 15% minimum in the Emergency Reserve and 10% in the Economic Contingency Reserve. The Emergency Reserve was established for the purpose of addressing any extremely unusual and infrequent occurrences, such as a major natural disaster or a major unforeseen settlement or judgment. Utilization of the Emergency Reserve may only occur after a majority of the City Council declares an emergency. The Economic Contingency Reserve was established for the purpose of providing a mechanism to allow for a measured and thoughtful reduction in expenditures during times of economic downturn. Utilization of the Economic Contingency Reserve requires approval by a majority of the City Council.

Committed Fund Balance
This balance includes amounts that can only be used for specific purposes due to formal action of the Mayor and City Council through the adoption of a resolution prior to the end of the fiscal year. Once adopted, the limitation imposed by the resolution remains in place until a similar action is taken (the adoption of another resolution) to remove or revise the limitation.

Assigned Fund Balance
This balance includes amounts constrained by an intent to be used for a specific purpose but is neither restricted nor committed. Through the Mayor and City Council’s adoption of the budget and subsequent budget adjustments throughout the year, the City assigns the specific purpose of the funding.

Unassigned Fund Balance
This balance is the residual classification that includes all spendable amounts in the General Fund not contained in other classifications or other fund balances.

General Fund Revenue
The proposed budget includes General Fund revenues of $208,349,947 in Fiscal Year 2024. This represents an 8.8% increase from the adopted revenue budget in Fiscal Year 2023 and a 7.3% increase from the originally adopted FY 2023-24 General Fund revenue budget. Several economic factors impact the growth trends that the City is experiencing, and that will continue to be monitored throughout the year.

Packet Pg.
617

1 3
6 9
General Fund revenue is comprised of several categories, including charges for services, fines, intergovernmental, and taxes. First, the analysis explaining the anticipated increases in the revenue projections will be discussed, followed by the analysis of the anticipated decreases.

The largest percentage of revenue in the General Fund comes from Sales and Use Tax and Measure S, which comprise 27.8% and 24.5% of the proposed General Fund revenues, respectively. Various economic conditions drive sales tax, which has seen increases in the reported numbers during the economic recovery post-pandemic in 2022.

Year-over-year, from 2021 to 2020, total receipts increased by 24%; however, this increase was not expected to be sustainable over the long term. San Bernardino’s receipts from October through December 2022 were 1.1% below the same period in 2021.

Even with the decrease, the sale of new and used cars increased during this period.

Online sales processed by local fulfillment centers were notably lower. Now that all centers’ allocations have been in place for at least a year, annual changes will reflect consumer spending preferences. The rest of the business industry groups reported mixed results; however, the trend still indicates a strong local economy. Measure S results indicate that the local economy still has quite a bit of energy left in it. Taxable sales for all of San Bernardino County grew 4.1%, and commuters and seasonal travelers continued to see gas prices above $5 per gallon in most of the State, resulting in fuel service stations tax receipts performing 10% higher than a year ago. The most influential impact was inflation, which drove up prices on everything from normal daily purchases to vehicles.

Based on these factors, the proposed budget projects that in Fiscal Year 2023, the Sales and Use Tax will bring in $58,000,000, and Measure S will bring in $51,000,000 as opposed to the previously adopted amounts of $51,500,000 for Sales and Use Tax and $46,000,000 for Measure S. The new projections show an 11.2% and 9.8% increase in each category, respectively.

Cannabis Revenue is projected to have a 54.0% decrease in FY 2024 due to the delay in

Packet Pg.
618

1 3
6 9
opening several cannabis operations. There are operators that were expected to be open in Fiscal Year 2023 that have received extensions and remain in the “construction” phase.

The Economic Development team is working diligently to assist these operators to get them on track to open. When this occurs, staff will revise the anticipated revenue to align more closely with the actual revenue received.

General Fund Expenditures
The proposed budget includes General Fund expenditures of $200,758,027 in Fiscal Year 2024. This represents a 6.6% increase from the adopted expenditures budget in Fiscal Year 2023 and a 4.4% increase from the originally adopted FY 2023-24 General Fund expenditure budget.

Several factors contribute to the overall increases that are reflected in the departments.

The adopted FY 2023-24 budget can accommodate the addition of some positions and allows for inflation and increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI); however, significant increases to the Budget, including the addition of more than 30 full-time personnel, has an ongoing operational impact that was not anticipated in the original Biennial Budget.

This mid-cycle review allows for ongoing Budget changes and additions during FY 2022- 23 to be added, and a new Proposed Budget to be brought forward. The economy also plays a major factor in the budget process. Currently, the economy is in a period of inflation impacting nearly every aspect of service delivery, and the procurement of goods and services continues to increase.

The proposed General Fund departmental expenditures are summarized in the table below. Note: Increases in Full-Time-Equivalent positions (FTEs) result in an ongoing impact on the General Fund. The personnel additions in FY 2022-23 drive most of the FY 2023-24 budget percentage increases. A further explanation for each department’s percentage increase is below the summary expenditure table.

Department FY 2022-23Adopted Budget FY 2022-23 Amended Budget FY 2023-24Adopted Budget FY 2023-24Mid-Cycle Review Proposed
Mid-Cycle % Changes
Capital Improvement Projects 5,050,000$ 5,050,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 0.0%City Clerk 1,486,807$ 1,954,098$ 1,586,893$ 1,836,829$ 13.6%City Council 931,882$ 931,483$ 959,087$ 1,084,346$ 11.6%City Manager 2,331,558$ 2,360,906$ 2,401,884$ 3,019,056$ 20.4%Community & Economic Development 9,647,543$ 13,144,037$ 9,872,539$ 11,721,180$ 15.8%Finance 6,000,646$ 5,899,454$ 6,218,078$ 5,587,998$ -11.3%General Government 15,685,165$ 17,311,961$ 15,180,105$ 15,147,856$ -0.2%Human Resources 2,508,177$ 2,550,908$ 2,587,614$ 2,741,874$ 5.6%Legal Services 3,176,084$ 4,278,996$ 3,310,443$ 4,309,583$ 23.2%Library 2,633,501$ 2,775,480$ 2,713,211$ 2,869,459$ 5.4%Mayor 377,224$ 377,135$ 317,840$ 305,812$ -3.9%Parks Recreation & Community 4,596,710$ 4,841,184$ 4,584,542$ 5,054,805$ 9.3%Police 106,395,588$ 108,879,614$ 112,629,800$ 115,050,227$ 2.1%Public Works 26,567,943$ 29,146,683$ 27,409,725$ 29,879,002$ 8.3%Special Assessment District 150,000$ 34,004$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 0.0%Total Expenditures 187,538,828$ 199,535,945$ 191,921,761$ 200,758,027$ 4.4% City of San Bernardino Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Mid-Cycle Review General Fund Expenditures

Packet Pg.
619

1 3
6 9
Capital Improvement Projects
The capital projects line in the table above reflects the General Fund or Measure S contribution planned for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The committed amount in Fiscal Year 2024 of $2,000,000 was established during the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2023 and Fiscal Year 2024 budget and will remain the same. The contribution from Measure S is significantly smaller than in the previous fiscal year budget cycles, largely due to an increase in operating budgets to support additional personnel and having fewer remaining funds available for capital projects. However, the CIP planned over the next year has revenue outside of the General Fund in special revenue funds. A summary of the previously committed CIP at the time of adoption of the Fiscal Year 2023 and Fiscal Year 2024 budget is explained further below.

City Clerk
In FY 2022-23, two (2) full-time positions were added to the City Clerk’s office: one (1) Customer Service Representative and one (1) Executive Assistant to the City Clerk. The recruitment for these positions was posted in February 2023 and March 2023, respectively. Of these, the Customer Service Representative is filled, and the Executive Assistant to the City Clerk recruitment is still in progress and not yet filled. The department’s personnel increase accounts for the 13.6% budget increase in the newly proposed FY 2023-24 to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

City Council
In FY 2022-23, the City Council approved an increase in Councilmember compensation.

This change in compensation was not previously accounted for. This change in compensation accounts for the 11.6% increase in the newly proposed FY 2023-24 budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

City Manager
In April 2023, the Grants Division team was moved from the Finance Department into the City Manager’s Office. This shift of expenditures from Finance into the City Manager’s office accounts for the 20.4% increase in the newly proposed FY 2023-24 budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Community, Housing, and Economic Development
In FY 2022-23, five (5) full-time positions were added to the department: one (1) Permit Services Supervisor, one (1) Plans Examiner II, one (1) Assistant Planner, one (1) Economic Development Specialist, and one (1) Senior Planner. Recruitment for many of

Packet Pg.
620

1 3
6 9
these positions has proven difficult to fill. The Permit Services Supervisor recruitment was posted in March 2023 and is currently filled. The Plans Examiner II was posted in August 2022, had a failed recruitment, has been reposted as “continuous,” and is currently not filled. The Senior Planner and Assistant Planner were posted in January 2023; the recruitment is ongoing and has not yet been filled. The Economic Development Specialist was posted in December 2022 and is currently filled. The General Fund also covers a portion of the cost of the fully staffed Housing personnel to comply with the allowable CDBG administration costs. These ongoing increases in FY 2023 account for the 15.8% increase in the newly proposed FY 2023-24 budget to the previously adopted FY 2023- 24 budget.

Finance
In April 2023, the Grants Division team was moved to the City Manager’s Office from the Finance Department, which is driving the decrease in the budget. With the FY 2023/24 Budget, Finance is requesting the addition of a full-time Payroll Technician. The Payroll Technician will review the accuracy of calculations for step increases, promotions, acting pay, and other special pays, as well as enter wage assignments, garnishments, and child support payments. As the number of personnel increases throughout the City, Payroll has struggled to keep up with only two full-time employees. As a crucial internal service function within Finance, the Payroll Division should grow proportionally to support the demands of the increased workforce. The addition of a full-time Payroll Technician within the Payroll Division to support the function is essential.

Finance also requests an increase in the Supplier Diversity Program budget (previously known as the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise [DBE] program) of $17,000. The DBE program was a council initiative, and the City currently has a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Specialist working on a Supplier Diversity Program and strategy. To provide further insight into the entirety of the program and strategy and to allow for feedback, discussion, and program goals, the DBE Specialist will be bringing forward a presentation before the Mayor and City Council soon. These changes account for the -11.3% decrease in the overall Finance budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

General Government
On May 18, 2022, nearing the end of FY 2022, an amendment to the lease agreement with Inland Empire 66ers Baseball Club was presented to the Mayor and City Council.

This agreement commits $7,150,000 to capital maintenance over the period of the agreement. Of this funding, $250,000 is to be allocated annually for Capital Maintenance expenses throughout the term and $3,400,000 in Capital Improvement funding. Capital Improvement Funding was agreed to be $1,800,000 in 2022, $600,000 in 2027, and

Packet Pg.
621

1 3
6 9
$1,000,000 in 2032. $250,000 has been included in the General Government budget for FY 2023/24. An addition of $100,000 in city-wide professional training has also been added. This training budget is set aside to be used on an “as needed” basis to help address leadership development skills and team-building activities city-wide.

General Government also accounts for the transfer out of the General Fund to the Animal Services Department (Fund). Animal Services produces some revenues through adoptions and animal licensing, but not enough to support their overall operating costs.

This discrepancy in expenses exceeding revenues results in a required transfer from the General Fund. Animal Services received authorization for an additional three (3) full-time employees, which increased their overall operating cost, resulting in a higher transfer from the General Fund General Government Department into the Animal Services Department.

Human Resources
The Human Resources (HR) Department is requesting the addition of one (1) full-time Human Resources Technician to allow for additional support within the Department. The Technician will focus on new hire documentation and processing and will be assigned to fulfill these functions while closely working with the Payroll Division to ensure accuracy in the City’s Payroll system, relieve the Senior HR Analyst of these tasks, and support the Senior HR analyst when necessary.

Human Resources also budgets for the advertising of recruitments city-wide. Recently, several positions have proven difficult to fill, therefore the department’s request that Human Resources advertise on specialized sites. To actively advertise on specialized sites for positions that are difficult to fill and require specialized skills, Human Resources is requesting an additional $75,000 in recruitment advertising funds.

These requests account for the 5.6% increase in the overall HR budget in the FY 2023- 24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Legal Services
In the FY 2022-23 Mid-Year Budget update, the Mayor and City Council authorized an ongoing increase of $1,000,000 in legal services. This is to fund the outside specialized legal counsel to address the several complex and high-profile cases against the city that have proven difficult to resolve. As a reminder, this increase is not for the municipal legal services retainer with BB&K. This ongoing expense that was allocated in FY 2022-23 required an update in FY 2023-24 budget numbers; this change accounts for the 23.2% increase of the overall Legal Services budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Packet Pg.
622

1 3
6 9

Library
In FY 2022-23, three (3) full-time Library Technician positions were added to the Department. The recruitment for these positions has proven challenging, as well as the ability to retain talent. As of this spring, all three positions have been filled. The addition of these positions is to help bring staffing levels at the branch libraries to allow for the libraries to return to pre-bankruptcy hours of operations. All the libraries have extended hours significantly in the last two years. These additions account for the 5.4% increase in the overall Library budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Mayor
The Mayor’s compensation was decreased to a $50,000 base salary, employer benefits equivalent to that offered by the City to management employees, and an auto allowance of $725 per month at the beginning of the newly elected Mayor’s term. This change to the Mayor’s compensation occurred after the completion of the city-wide biennial workforce budget. The new budget total includes the correct compensation cost for the Mayor accounting for the 3.9% decrease in the overall budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
In FY 2023, the Parks, Recreations and Community Services Department took over the Military Banner program and was allocated funding in FY 2022-23 1st Quarter update to support the cost of materials. The Department purchased a special printer to create the banners in-house and to be able to honor more of our local heroes. To continue supporting this program and the cost of materials involved in the printing of military banners, an ongoing amount of $10,000 has been committed to the Department.

The Department has also done an amazing job with special events throughout this last fiscal year. Overwhelming support for the continuation of these events has been received; staff requests an annual allocation of $300,000 to support these community events. Of this annual allocation, $100,000 will be dedicated to the annual Tree Lighting for the tree rental, downtown lighting and Garland and tree fixing materials, and security; $100,000 will be dedicated to Miracle on Court Street for the light show, supplies for inside the court, various entertainment, ice rink, extra security beyond the tree lighting for 15 days, and miscellaneous materials and supplies; and $100,000 will be dedicated to Festival for carnival rides and games, entertainment performances and stage sound technology, and various rentals for the event. These additions to the department’s budget account for the

9.3% increase in the overall budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Packet Pg.
623

1 3
6 9
Police
In FY 2022-23, eleven (11) full-time civilian positions were added to the Department: four (4) Community Service Officers, three (3) Police Records Technicians, one (1) Accounting Technician, one (1) Senior Office Assistant, one (1) Crime Analyst, and one (1) Police Dispatcher. The recruitment for positions within the Police Department, while posted immediately after approval from the Mayor and City Council, often has a delay in hiring due to the extensive background process for any position employed by the Police Department. The four (4) Community Service Officers and one (1) Police Dispatchers recruitment were posted as “continuous,” and all five (5) positions have been filled. The three (3) Police Records Technicians, one (1) Accounting Technician, one (1) Senior Office Assistant, and one (1) Crime Analyst positions were posted in December 2022, five (5) of which positions were filled and two (2) of which are in progress, but not yet filled.

The Department also received COPS grants that required a General Fund match and were given funding for an Evidence Software Database, which both have ongoing costs that need to be reflected in the FY 2023-24 budget. The Police Department’s budget accounts for 57.3% of the total General Fund budget; therefore, large personnel additions like that in FY 2022-23 have a significant ongoing budgetary impact. However, given the magnitude of the total Department budget, these additions to the Department’s budget reflect only a 2.1% increase in the overall Department operating budget in the FY 2023- 24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Public Works
In FY 2022-23, thirteen (13) full-time employees were added to the Department: one (1) Deputy Director of Operations, eight (8) Maintenance Workers, two (2) Lead Maintenance Workers, and two (2) Maintenance Supervisors. The recruitment for the Deputy Director of Operations was posted in February 2023 and has been filled. The maintenance worker package was posted in January 2023 and February 2023. Of the eight (8) Maintenance Workers, five (5) are filled and (3) remain vacant; for the two (2) Lead Maintenance Workers, one (1) is filled and one (1) remains vacant; for the two (2) Maintenance Supervisors, one (1) is filled and one (1) remains vacant. The additions in personnel account for the 8.3% increase in the overall budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Other Fund Expenditures
The departments under “Other Funds” are, for the most part, Internal Service Funds or Departments, excluding Animal Services. The Internal Service Funds impact the General Fund through internal service charges. Internal service charges are distributed throughout each department in the General Fund to account for the revenue needed in the Internal Service Funds to allow each Internal Service Department to operate and provide services city-wide. As discussed before, the Animal Services Department is its own but does not produce enough revenue to be self-sufficient. Therefore, the department’s expenditures are recorded separately from the General Fund and the impact this department has on

Packet Pg.
624

1 3
6 9
the General Fund is the transfer it requires to support its day-to-day operations. The proposed budget for the Other Funds is $32,886,290 in Fiscal Year 2024. This represents a 16.0% increase from the adopted expenditures budget in Fiscal Year 2023 and a 12.2% increase from the originally adopted FY 2023-24 Other Funds expenditure budget.

The proposed Other Funds departmental expenditures are summarized in the table below.

Animal Services
In FY 2022-23, three (3) full-time employees were added to the department: one (1) Animal Services Manager, one (1) Animal Services Supervisor, and one (1) Animal Control Officer. Recruitment for all three (3) positions was posted in March 2023 and is in progress but not yet filled. The additions in personnel account for the 19.3% increase in the overall budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Fleet Services
In FY 2022-23, utility rates for Electric, Water, and Gas have seen a noticeable increase.

In FY 2023-24, staff slightly increased the utilities' budgets to better align with the rate trends seen in FY 2022-23. These changes account for the 6.0% increase in the overall budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Information Technology
In FY 2022-23, the Information Technology (IT) department was granted a lump sum of funds to update infrastructure and several services city-wide, with some ongoing software maintenance costs anticipated to occur in the following fiscal years after the initial updates.

The IT Department is also requesting the addition of a Network System Administrator.

There is currently only one full-time employee in the Network Division, and this Division is critical to the ongoing operations of the City. This Division services the City’s network system, as well as the phone system. There is only one full-time employee in the Division, putting significant pressure on an individual employee to be available around the clock and address any network or phone issues the City may have. Additionally, having one person responsible for the network and phone system puts the City at greater risk in an Fund FY 2022-23Adopted Budget FY 2022-23Amended Budget FY 2023-24Adopted Budget FY 2023-24Mid-Cycle Review Proposed
Mid-Cycle % Changes
Animal Services 3,719,863$ 4,523,439$ 3,731,535$ 4,621,705$ 19.3%Fleet Services 4,849,884$ 6,170,295$ 5,180,546$ 5,509,724$ 6.0%Information Technology 7,432,494$ 11,182,490$ 7,733,534$ 7,849,370$ 1.5%Liability Insurance 6,164,986$ 8,628,036$ 6,627,655$ 9,178,259$ 27.8%Workers Compensation 5,466,341$ 5,467,098$ 5,597,850$ 5,727,232$ 2.3%Total Other Funds 27,633,567$ 35,971,358$ 28,871,120$ 32,886,290$ 12.2%

OTHER FUNDS

Packet Pg.
625

1 3
6 9
outage event. The software maintenance costs have been implemented into the new budget, which accounts for the slight 1.5% increase in the overall IT budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Liability Insurance Fund
This fund maintains the balance from which claims liabilities are paid, and the General Fund pays into this fund annually to ensure adequate funds to pay estimated claims.

During the mid-year update of FY 2022-23, an additional $2,000,000 was allocated as an ongoing cost due to higher-than-anticipated settlement agreements. This ongoing cost has been recommended by the Legal Services team to ensure that the City has adequate funding for FY 2023-24 should current litigation be settled and paid sooner than anticipated. These ongoing costs account for the 27.8% increase in the overall budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Workers Compensation
This fund maintains the balance from which claims liabilities for Workers’ Compensation are paid. The General Fund pays into this fund annually to ensure adequate funds to pay estimated claims. The only slight increase in the budget here is due to updated personnel costs in HR, with the proposed addition of a technician. This slight change in expenditure costs in the fund accounts for the 2.3% increase in the overall budget in the FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget to the previously adopted FY 2023-24 budget.

Capital Improvement Program
On June 1, 2022, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget was adopted with $42,120,044 for projects in FY 2022-23 and $9,876,057 for projects in FY 2023-24. The funding adopted for both years was invested in new projects or additional funding for existing projects. Many of these projects that had committed funding may have been awarded contracts in FY 2022-23 and will move through their appropriate project phase in FY 2023-24. These projects, and any that have not started, will be carried over into the new fiscal year because the project funds, once adopted by the Mayor and City Council, are committed, and will remain so through the life of the project. Detailed expenditure reports for projects adopted on June 1, 2022, have been previously published in City of San Bernardino Interactive Budget Book - CIP Projects.

The FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget for CIP is $9,126,057. The summary of funding committed to each category of the CIP is in the table below.

Packet Pg.
626

1 3
6 9
These projects in the CIP are funded through a variety of revenue streams within separate funds. The dedicated funds help ensure that the expenditures associated match the restrictions and requirements determined by the revenue tax measure or other specific restrictions. Some of the larger dedicated revenue streams include:

Measure I – Half Cent Sales Tax
This revenue stream is the City’s share of the County-wide half-cent sales tax measure approved by the voters to provide street maintenance and construction funding. It is highly regulated and restrictive as to its use. The largest project this revenue will fund in FY 2023-24 is the Citywide Pavement Rejuvenation Slurry/Crack Seal. This fund will also have a large carryover from FY 2022-23 into FY 2023-24 from the Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation Project. This project is in partnership with the City of Rialto and will focus on the rehabilitation of this major corridor from Baseline Road to Mill Street.

SB 1 – Road Repair & Accountability Gas Tax
Senate Bill 1 established several local street programs that fund deferred maintenance at the local level. These funds can be used for a variety of street maintenance or maintenance within the right-of-way that include complete streets, traffic signals, or storm drain improvements. City-wide street rehabilitation programs are primarily funded through this revenue stream.

Regional Circulation Fees
These are development impact fees, and the use of the funds is restricted to projects that specifically improve circulation on a regional basis, including freeway interchanges, access ramps, or major access points between cities. These fees will continue to fund the Mt. Vernon Bridge Replacement and the 40 th St. Widening from Johnson to Electric.

Projects already being funded through this in FY 2022-23 are State St. Extension – Phase 1: 16 th St. to Baseline Rd., H St. Kendall to 40 th Widening, and the 2 nd St. Bridge replacement.

Local Circulation Fees
These fees are imposed on new residential, commercial, and industrial development to fund streets, traffic signals, and bridges. No funds in FY 2023-24 were adopted for this fund, but several CIP projects in FY 2022-23 are being funded through these fees and

Packet Pg.
627

1 3
6 9
will continue to be funded until the completion of the projects.

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant Fund
The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core federal-aid program that seeks to significantly reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. These funds are applied for and awarded to specific projects. In the current CIP, these funds are continuing to support signal hardware upgrades and advanced dilemma zone detection.

Storm Drain Construction Fund
New developments pay impact fees based on the size of their development for the construction and maintenance of the citywide storm drain system. These funds continue to support the maintenance of a variety of city-wide storm drain projects, including the new storm drain on Sierra Way. Another community priority project is the improvement of the Mt. Vernon Storm Drain; this project is currently in design and was allocated an additional $3 million in funding for Fiscal Year 2022-23. This fund will continue to fund priority projects such as these.

Public Use Facility Fund
These funds are restricted to the construction and maintenance of public use facilities, including community centers or buildings used by the public. In FY 2022-23, three projects were recommended to be funded through these funds. These included a server room upgrade at City Hall, AC Unit replacements at the Regal Theater, and a new One-Stop Permitting and Business Registration Center. This center will centralize all Permitting and Business Registration to ensure a streamlined process for our development community and residents seeking to navigate the processes. These projects are in progress, and all funding will be carried over the entirety of the projects.

Cultural Development Fund
The Cultural Development Fund is a revenue stream comprised of a construction tax on new construction or improvements. The funds are intended to support cultural development programs throughout the city or any other such use as directed by the Mayor and City Council. These funds will continue to support projects such as the Perris Hill Senior Center Roof Replacement and a portion of the Parks Master Plan.

AB 1600 Parkland Development Impact Fee Fund
These are fees collected to fund new park facilities or the maintenance of existing facilities. These funds will continue to fund projects such as the Nicholson Neighborhood Park Improvements, Newmark Ball Field Lighting Systems, Speicher Park Field Lighting, and the Bobby Vega Park Improvement.

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
The City receives CDBG funding through a variety of mechanisms for different programmatic purposes. Within the CIP, these funds focus on supporting projects that

Packet Pg.
628

1 3
6 9
provide viable urban communities and improve the living conditions of all residents within the community. These funds will continue to support park improvement projects and street rehabilitation projects.

Measure S
This funding is a general transaction and use tax specific to the City of San Bernardino approved by voters in November 2020. These funds were treated as one-time funds in past fiscal years and supported a large public investment in several capital projects, including streets, parks, and buildings. As the City has expanded its operating budget to meet the community’s needs, fewer funds are available for capital projects. For Fiscal Year 2024, staff is recommending that $2,000,000 fund projects in Fiscal Year 2024.

American Rescue Plan (ARP) Funds
The City received a significant one-time allocation of more than $77 million from the American Rescue Plan Act. These funds are committed to several projects by the Mayor and City Council. As capital projects are added, they will be added to the CIP. For those projects with dedicated funds from prior fiscal years, the funds remain dedicated and will carry over into future budget cycles as the projects move through the development process.

Apart from the previously adopted 2023-27 CIP, various projects have come before the Mayor and City Council through FY 2022-23 that committed additional funding and will be added to the new CIP document. The additional projects impact different categories within the CIP, which are noted in the previous table in the “FY 2023 Updated” line items. The amounts differ from the FY 2022-23 adopted CIP because these new projects are being accounted for. These new projects are shown below:

The adopted 2023-2027 CIP is included in the attachments with asterisks to denote which projects and new funding have been added in FY 2022-23. The Public Works department and Finance have worked together to bring forward a report on the status of planned and ongoing CIP projects and any reallocations that may need to occur. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
The review of the proposed budget aligns with all critical targets of the City Council’s Strategic Plan. Funding projects and programs at every level of the organization ensure that the City can achieve the goals and priorities established by the Council.

Packet Pg.
629

1 3
6 9
Fiscal Impact
There is no direct fiscal impact from receiving the presentation of the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan. The budget process ensures that allocating the City’s resources aligns with the Mayor and City Council’s vision and priorities for the community. Staff will return to the Mayor and City Council on June 21, 2023, to adopt the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan.

Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of San Bernardino, California:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing on the proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan;

2. Receive and file the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating and Capital Improvement Plan presentation and provide direction to staff.

Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – Proposed Budget PPT Presentation

2. Attachment 2 – San Bernardino County Sun Advertisement

3. Attachment 3 – City of San Bernardino’s Position Control

4. Attachment 4 – Adopted Capital Improvement Program 2023-2027 with Updates
Ward:

All Wards
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

December 7, 2022 FY 2022/23 First Quarter Update was presented to the Mayor and City Council.

March 1, 2023 FY 2022/23 Mid-Year Budget Update was presented to The Mayor and City Council.

Packet Pg.
630

Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating
Budget and Capital Improvement Plan​
Barbara Whitehorn, Agency Director of Administrative Services Zuyva Ruiz, Budget Division Manager
June 7, 2023

Packet Pg.
631

FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget
Presentation Overview
• Budget Timeline
• Proposed Budget Revenue & Expenditures
• Recommended Expenditure Budget
• Fund Balance Forecast
• Capital Improvement Plan and Funding
• Next Steps
• Discussion

Packet Pg.
632

Budget Adoption Timeline
Date Group Type of Meeting Subject Matter
May 9, 2023City Council Special Meeting Budget Workshop for Mid-Cycle Review June 7, 2023City Council Regular Meeting Budget Hearing - Proposed FY 2023-24 Budget June 21, 2023City Council Regular Meeting Budget Adoption

Packet Pg.
633

FY 2023-2024 Proposed Revenues
Description of Revenue
FY 2022-23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022-23
Amended
Budget
FY 2022-23
Year-End
Projections
FY 2023-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023-24
Mid-Cycle Review
Proposed
Mid-Cycle
% Changes
Charges for Services 8,112,400$ 10,335,402$ 9,093,639$ 8,772,650$ 9,133,250$ 3.9% Fines and Forfeitures 1,365,500$ 1,050,200$ 932,211$ 1,417,500$ 1,416,000$ -0.1% Franchise Tax 11,781,000$ 11,781,000$ 12,553,725$ 11,781,000$ 12,791,000$ 7.9% Intergovernmental 2,367,000$ 2,702,000$ 1,342,250$ 2,382,000$ 2,372,000$ -0.4% Investment Income 525,000$ 575,000$ 592,137$ 525,000$ 540,000$ 2.8% Licenses & Permits 12,430,000$ 12,488,000$ 12,897,783$ 12,743,000$ 12,768,000$ 0.2% Measure S 46,000,000$ 50,000,000$ 51,500,000$ 46,000,000$ 51,000,000$ 9.8% Miscellaneous 1,181,556$ 1,495,386$ 3,688,697$ 1,202,556$ 3,709,697$ 0.6% Other Taxes 7,656,000$ 7,756,000$ 7,501,595$ 7,816,000$ 9,016,000$ 13.3% Property Taxes 22,500,000$ 21,436,789$ 21,518,773$ 23,000,000$ 23,000,000$ 0.0% Sales and Use Tax 50,000,000$ 52,000,000$ 52,000,000$ 51,500,000$ 58,000,000$ 11.2% Cannabis Revenue 4,120,000$ 4,000,000$ 2,600,000$ 4,620,000$ 3,000,000$ -54.0% Use of Money and Property 529,000$ 646,246$ 1,044,591$ 554,000$ 604,000$ 8.3% Utility User Tax 21,430,500$ 23,000,000$ 27,708,180$ 20,890,000$ 21,000,000$ 0.5% Total Revenues 189,997,956$ 199,266,023$ 204,973,581$ 193,203,706$ 208,349,947$ 7.3%

Packet Pg.
634

General Fund Revenue Budget Changes
5 •
Charges for Services
•
Miscellaneous Police Receipts (+$500,000)
•
Blanket Inspection Fee (+$225,000)
•
Franchise Tax
•
Burrtec Disposal (+$1,000,000)
•
Other Taxes
•
Transient Occupancy Tax (+$1,200,000)
•
Cannabis Tax (
-
$1,500,000)
•
Sales and Use Tax (+$6,500,000)
•
Measure S Tax (+$5,000,000)

Packet Pg.
635

Proposed FY 2023-2024 General Fund Expenses
Department FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget
FY 2022-23 Amended
Budget
FY 2023-24
Adopted Budget
FY 2023-24
Mid-Cycle
Review Proposed
Mid-Cycle %
Changes
Capital Improvement Projects 5,050,000$ 5,050,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 0.0% City Clerk 1,486,807$ 1,954,098$ 1,586,893$ 1,836,829$ 13.6% City Council 931,882$ 931,483$ 959,087$ 1,084,346$ 11.6% City Manager 2,331,558$ 2,360,906$ 2,401,884$ 3,019,056$ 20.4% Community & Economic Development 9,647,543$ 13,144,037$ 9,872,539$ 11,721,180$ 15.8% Finance 6,000,646$ 5,899,454$ 6,218,078$ 5,587,998$ -11.3% General Government 15,685,165$ 17,311,961$ 15,180,105$ 15,147,856$ -0.2% Human Resources 2,508,177$ 2,550,908$ 2,587,614$ 2,741,874$ 5.6% Legal Services 3,176,084$ 4,278,996$ 3,310,443$ 4,309,583$ 23.2% Library 2,633,501$ 2,775,480$ 2,713,211$ 2,869,459$ 5.4% Mayor 377,224$ 377,135$ 317,840$ 305,812$ -3.9% Parks Recreation & Community 4,596,710$ 4,841,184$ 4,584,542$ 5,054,805$ 9.3% Police 106,395,588$ 108,879,614$ 112,629,800$ 115,050,227$ 2.1% Public Works 26,567,943$ 29,146,683$ 27,409,725$ 29,879,002$ 8.3% Special Assessment District 150,000$ 34,004$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 0.0% Total Expenditures 187,538,828$ 199,535,945$ 191,921,761$ 200,758,027$ 4.4%

Packet Pg.
636

Proposed FY 2023-2024 Other Fund Expenses
Fund FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget
FY 2022-23
Amended Budget
FY 2023-24
Adopted Budget
FY 2023-24
Mid-Cycle
Review Proposed
Mid-Cycle %
Changes
Animal Services 3,719,863$ 4,523,439$ 3,731,535$ 4,621,705$ 19.3% Fleet Services 4,849,884$ 6,170,295$ 5,180,546$ 5,509,724$ 6.0% Information Technology 7,432,494$ 11,182,490$ 7,733,534$ 7,849,370$ 1.5% Liability Insurance 6,164,986$ 8,628,036$ 6,627,655$ 9,178,259$ 27.8% Workers Compensation 5,466,341$ 5,467,098$ 5,597,850$ 5,727,232$ 2.3% Total Other Funds 27,633,567$ 35,971,358$ 28,871,120$ 32,886,290$ 12.2%

OTHER FUNDS

Packet Pg.
637

Changes or Additions in General Fund FY 2022/23
• City Clerk
• Addition of 2 full-time positions
• City Council
• Councilmember compensation
• City Manager
• Grants Division moved into the Department
• Community, Housing, and Economic Development
• Addition of 5 full-time positions, Housing personnel cost absorbed by General Fund
• Finance
• Grants Division moved to City Manager’s Office

Packet Pg.
638

Changes or Additions in General Fund FY 2022/23
• Legal Services
• Ongoing amount of $1,000,000 allocated during Mid-Year • Library
• Addition of 3 full-time positions
• Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
• Military Banner Program, increase in funding for supplies • Police
• Addition of 11 full-time civilian positions, COPs grant with General Fund match, and Evidence Software Database.
• Public Works
• Addition of 13 full-time positions

Packet Pg.
639

Changes or Additions in Other Funds FY 2022/23
• Animal Services
• Addition of 3 full-time positions
• Fleet Services
• Increase in utility costs
• Information Technology
• Various infrastructure and system upgrades
• Liability Fund
• Ongoing amount of $2,000,000allocated during Mid-Year

Packet Pg.
640

General Fund Budget Additions Requested for FY 2023/24
• General Government
• $250,000 for 66ers Stadium Maintenance, $100,000 in city-wide professional training
• Human Resources
• Addition of 1 full-time Human Resource Technician ($84,689), $75,000 in specialized recruitment advertising
• Finance
• Addition of 1 full-time Payroll Technician ($81,434), $17,000 in Supplier Diversity funding
• Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
• $100,000 for Tree Lighting, $100,000 for Miracle on Court St., $100,000 for Festival
• Information Technology
• Addition of 1 full-time Network Systems Administrator ($154,568) Total
ongoing
additions:
$1,120,691

Packet Pg.
641

FY 2023 & 2024 Personnel Summary
DEPARTMENT FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24
Proposed
ANIMAL SERVICES 37.00 37.00
CITY ATTORNEY 1.00 1.00
CITY CLERK 8.00 8.00
CITY COUNCIL 9.00 9.00
CITY MANAGER 10.00 14.00
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DVLP 66.00 69.00
FINANCE 33.00 30.00
GENERAL GOVERNMENT 7.00 7.00
HUMAN RESOURCES 13.00 14.00
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 15.00 16.00
LIBRARY 18.00 18.00
MAYOR 2.00 2.00
PARKS 27.00 27.00
POLICE 437.00 437.00
PUBLIC WORKS 139.00 136.00
TOTAL FTE 822.00 825.00

Packet Pg.
642

General Fund Focus Areas
• Maintaining service level enhancements from FY 2023 and ensuring the City meets the needs of the community
• Improving Community and Economic Development
Customer Service
• Enhancing Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
• Improving Quality of Life - safety, cleanliness & ongoing infrastructure improvements

Packet Pg.
643

General Fund Proposed
Reserves
Emergency & Economic Contingency Reserves: 25%
• Aligns with General Fund Reserve Policy Adopted in 2018 Strategic Priority Reserve: $3,539,363
• Allocation to be discussed at upcoming workshop(s)
Capital Contingency Reserve: $9,000,000
• Allocation for capital projects already in the pipeline facing cost increases

Packet Pg.
644

Fund Balance Forecast
The City has
“spendable”
Fund Balance
of 60% of next
year’s
Budgeted
Expenditures
General Fund Balance, 6/30/2022 97,036,479$
Measure S, 6/30/2022 57,201,940
TOTAL Fund Balance, 6/30/2022 154,238,419$
"Non-Spendable" (40,204,687)
"Spendable" as of 6/30/2022 114,033,732$
FY 2022/23 Total Revenue Forecast 204,973,581
FY 2022/23 Total Expenditure Forecast (199,535,945)
Anticipated Increase/(Decrease) to Fund Balance 5,437,636$ Anticipated "Spendable" as of 6/30/2023 119,471,368$
FY 2021/22
FY 2022/23

Packet Pg.
645

Fund Balance Forecast
Categories of "Spendable" Fund Balance-
Restricted, Committed, and Assigned 62,797,125
10% Emergency Reserve 20,075,803
15% Economic Contingency Reserve 30,113,704
Capital Contingency Reserve 5,400,000
Unassigned Fund Balance, forecast 6/30/2023 1,084,736
119,471,368$
FY 2023/24 Budgeted Revenues 208,349,947
FY 2023/24 Budgeted Expenditures (200,758,027)
Anticipated Increase/(Decrease) to Fund Balance 7,591,920$ Additional Reserves, FY 2023/24:

Strategic Initiative Reserve 3,539,363$
Capital Contingency Reserve 3,600,000$
TOTAL Capital Contingency Reserve, FY 2023/24 9,000,000$ FY 2023/24
Percentage
of the next
year’s
Budgeted
Expenditures
Funding for
existing
projects with
unanticipated
cost increases

Packet Pg.
646

Capital Improvement Program

Packet Pg.
647

Capital Improvement Program
Criteria
• Health and Safety
• Asset Condition (i.e., Pavement Condition)
• Community Service and Programming Needs
• Deferred Maintenance
• Compliance/Legal Requirements (i.e., ADA Improvements)

Packet Pg.
648

Capital Improvement Program – New in FY 2023
• Carousel Mall Demolition: $8,084,000 from Measure S
• Speicher Ball Field Improvements: $1,950,000 from ARPA & San Manuel Grant
• Norton Gym Facility Upgrades: $30,000 from Cultural
Development Fund
• Meyers Creek Focused Drainage Study: $266,771 from Storm Drain Fund
• Arrowhead Farm Street Rehabilitation: $490,000 from Measure I • Cross Street Bridge: Construction cost to be determined

Packet Pg.
649

Capital Improvement Program – FY 2023/24
• FY 2023/24 funding was committed on June 1, 2022
• Additions throughout FY 2022/23 have been added
into the CIP
• Attachment in agenda shows all CIP projects

Packet Pg.
650

Capital Improvement Program – FY 2023/24
Adopted Funding by Category
(Includes New and Existing Projects) FY 2023
FY 2023
Updated FY 2024
FY 2024
Updated
Buildings 2,050,000$ 12,751,664$ 400,000$ 400,000$ Parks and Recreation 2,645,000 5,565,000 2,850,000 2,100,000 Storm Drainage 6,650,000 6,916,771 650,000 650,000 Traffic Controls and Street Lighting 4,678,000 4,731,070 - - Streets Projects 26,097,044 31,226,780 5,976,057 5,976,057 Other - - - - Total CIP 42,120,044$ 61,191,285$ 9,876,057$ 9,126,057$

Packet Pg.
651

Recap of New Requests
• General Government
• $250,000 for 66ers Stadium Maintenance, $100,000 in city-wide professional training
• Human Resources
• Addition of 1 full-time Human Resource Technician ($84,689), $75,000 in specialized recruitment advertising
• Finance
• Addition of 1 full-time Payroll Technician ($81,434), $17,000 in Supplier Diversity funding
• Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
• $100,000 for Tree Lighting, $100,000 for Miracle on Court St., $100,000 for Festival
• Information Technology
• Addition of 1 full-time Network Systems Administrator ($154,568) Total
ongoing
additions:
$1,120,691

Packet Pg.
652

Budget Adoption - Next Steps
• Presentation of Budget for Adoption on
June 21, 2023, Mayor & City Council
Meeting

Packet Pg.
653

Discussion

Packet Pg.
654

This space for filing stamp only
OR#:

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R

~ SINCE 1921 ~
600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
State of California )
County of Orange

) ss
Notice Type:

Ad Description:

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire
issue of said newspaper and not in
any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:

Executed on: 10/10/2004
At Riverside, California
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signature

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN
473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408
(909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536
SB 3701200
Diane Grant

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD
290 NORTH D ST.

SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92401

HRG - NOTICE OF HEARING
Reviewing the Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SAN BERNARDINO, county of SAN BERNARDINO, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, under date 06/27/1952, Case No. 73081. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
05/17/2023
05/17/2023

SAN BERNARDINO
!A000006312933!
Email

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN BERNARDINO
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the City of San Bernardino Mayor
and City Council will hold a public
meeting on June 7, 2023 at 7:00 PM in
the City Council Chambers in the
Norman F. Feldheym Central
Library at 555 West 6
th Street, San
Bernardino, California. Visit the
City's agenda portal at
www.sbcity.org to access for more
meeting information.

The purpose of the hearing is to
receive input and consider the
following:

Reviewing the Proposed Fiscal Year
2023-24 Operating Budget and
Capital Improvement Plan
Notice is further given that
members of the public who wish to
comment on the public hearing you
may participate in the following
ways: 1) comments and contact
information can be emailed to
[email protected] by
4:00 P.M. the day of the scheduled
meeting; 2) attending the meeting in
person and providing your public
comment in person or 3) providing
remote public comment via Zoom,
not to exceed three minutes. Please
view the agenda for additional
information.

The City endeavors to be in total
compliance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act. If you require
assistance or auxiliary aids in order
to participate in the meeting or
require an interpreter, please
contact the City Clerk's Office as far
in advance of the meeting as
possible.

A general summary of the budget
will be accessible for public review
on the city's website
http://sbcity.org/cityhall/city_manag
ers_office/budget_books/default.asp.

Additional information concerning
the above matter may be obtained
from, and written comments should
be addressed to, City Clerk, City of
San Bernardino, 290 North "D" Street,
San Bernardino, California 92401.

Genoveva Rocha, CMC, City Clerk
5/17/23
SBS-3701200#

Packet Pg.
655

Budgeted Positions FY 2022/23
Total Council-
Authorized
Positions
Filled Total Vacant Total
ACCOUNTANT II 1.00 1 .00 - ACCOUNTANT II - PAYROLL 1.00 1 .00 - ACCOUNTANT III 1.00 1 .00 - ACCOUNTING DIVISION MANAGER (U) 1.00 - 1.00 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) 3.00 2 .00 1.00 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN II 3.00 2 .00 1.00 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN III 3.00 3 .00 - ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 9.00 9 .00 - ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY COUNCIL (U) 1.00 1 .00 - ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS SPECIALIST 1.00 - 1.00 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR AND EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER (U) 1.00 - 1.00 AGENCY DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (U) 1.00 1 .00 - AGENCY DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY, HOUSING, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (U) 1.00 1 .00 - AGENCY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE (U) 1.00 1 .00 - ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER II 6.00 5 .00 1.00 ANIMAL SERVICES MANAGER 1.00 - 1.00 ANIMAL SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE 2.00 2 .00 - ANIMAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR 3.00 2 .00 1.00 ANIMAL SHELTER ATTENDANT 12.00 9. 00 3.00 AQUATICS SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - ARBORIST 1.00 1 .00 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT/REAL PROP SPECIALIST 1.00 1 .00 - ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE 1.00 1 .00 - ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - ASSISTANT PLANNER (FLEX) 2.00 2 .00 - ASSOCIATE PLANNER 3.00 2 .00 1.00 BUDGET DIVISION MANAGER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - BUILDING INSPECTION SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - BUILDING INSPECTOR I (FLEX) 2.00 1 .00 1.00 BUILDING OFFICIAL (U) 1.00 1 .00 - BUSINESS REGISTRATION INSPECTOR 6.00 5 .00 1.00 BUSINESS REGISTRATION MANAGER 1.00 1 .00 - BUSINESS REGISTRATION REPRESENTATIVE I 2.00 1 .00 1.00 BUYER 1.00 1 .00 -

Packet Pg.
656

CDBG/HOUSING PR0GRAM ASSISTANT 2.00 1 .00 1.00 CEMETERY CARETAKER 1.00 1 .00 - CHIEF OF POLICE 1.00 1 .00 - CITY CLERK (U) 1.00 1 .00 - CITY MANAGER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - CIVIL ENGINEERING DIVISION MANAGER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION MANAGER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I (FLEX) 8.00 6 .00 2.00 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II 10.00 7. 00 3.00 COMMON COUNCIL 7.00 7 .00 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) COORDINATOR 1.00 - 1.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICIAN 4.00 2 .00 2.00 COMMUNITY INTERVENTION PROGRAM MANAGER (U) 1.00 - 1.00 COMMUNITY RECREATION MANAGER 2.00 2 .00 - COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR 7.00 7 .00 - COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 2.00 2 .00 - COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTER SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER 38.00 3 2.00 6.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM COORDINATOR 6.00 6 .00 - CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 1.00 1 .00 - COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR (U) 1.00 1 .00 - CRIME ANALYST 4.00 4 .00 - CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OFFICER 10.00 1 0.00 - CUSTODIAL SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - CUSTODIAN 8.00 7 .00 1.00 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE 3.00 3 .00 - CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (BILINGUAL) 1.00 1 .00 - DATA ANALYST 1.00 1 .00 - DEPUTY CITY CLERK I (U) 2.00 2 .00 - DEPUTY CITY CLERK III (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER (U) 1.00 - 1.00 DEPUTY DIRECTOR/CITY PLANNER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DETECTIVE/CORPORAL 44.00 4 3.00 1.00

Packet Pg.
657

DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL SERVICES (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DIRECTOR OF PARKS/REC/COMMUNITY SERVICES (U) 1.00 1 .00 - DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) SPECIALIST 1.00 1 .00 - DIVERSITY, EQUITY & INCLUSION OFFICER (U) 1.00 - 1.00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MANAGER 1.00 1 .00 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST 2.00 2 .00 - ELECTRICIAN I (FLEX) 1.00 1 .00 - ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I (FLEX) 2.00 1 .00 1.00 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT II 4.00 4 .00 - ENGINEERING ASSISTANT III 1.00 1 .00 - ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 1.00 1 .00 - ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGER 1.00 - 1.00 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 2.00 2 .00 - ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP) PROJECT MANAGER 1.00 1 .00 - ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS COORDINATOR 1.00 1 .00 - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 1.00 - 1.00 EQUIPMENT MECHANIC II 7.00 6 .00 1.00 EQUIPMENT SERVICE WORKER 2.00 2 .00 - EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 3.00 3 .00 - EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT (U) 1.00 1 .00 - EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO DIRECTOR (U) 9.00 7 .00 2.00 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO MAYOR (U) 1.00 1 .00 - FACILITIES & FLEET MAINTENANCE DIVISION MANAGER (U) 1.00 - 1.00 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE MECHANIC 4.00 3 .00 1.00 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - FOOD SERVICE SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - FORENSICS SPECIALIST I (FLEX) 3.00 3 .00 - FORENSICS SPECIALIST II 6.00 6 .00 - FORENSICS SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - FORESTRY SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - GIS ADMINISTRATOR 1.00 1 .00 - GRANTS DIVISION MANAGER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - GRANTS MANAGER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - GRANTS WRITER 1.00 - 1.00 GROUNDWORKER ARBORIST 2.00 1 .00 1.00 HOMELESS SERVICES COORDINATOR 1.00 1 .00 -

Packet Pg.
658

HOUSING COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST 1.00 1 .00 - HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST 1.00 - 1.00 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN 2.00 2 .00 - HVAC MECHANIC 1.00 1 .00 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST II 2.00 2 .00 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER 2.00 2 .00 - LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION INSPECTOR I (FLEX) 1.00 1 .00 - LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION INSPECTOR II 3.00 3 .00 - LEAD ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER 1.00 1 .00 - LEAD BUILDING INSPECTOR 1.00 1 .00 - LEAD CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 2.00 2 .00 - LEAD CUSTODIAN 1.00 1 .00 - LEAD EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 1.00 1 .00 - LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER 6.00 5 .00 1.00 LEAD PARKS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE WORKER 1.00 1 .00 - LEGAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (U) 1.00 1 .00 - LIBRARIAN I (FLEX) 1.00 1 .00 - LIBRARIAN II 1.00 1 .00 - LIBRARY CIRCULATION SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - LIBRARY DIRECTOR (U) 1.00 1 .00 - LIBRARY NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR 1.00 1 .00 - LIBRARY NETWORK TECHNICIAN 1.00 1 .00 - LIBRARY PROGRAM COORDINATOR 1.00 1 .00 - LIBRARY TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) 4.00 3 .00 1.00 LIBRARY TECHNICIAN II 4.00 4 .00 - LIEUTENANT 12.00 1 2.00 - LITERACY PROGRAM COORDINATOR 1.00 1 .00 - MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 3.00 1 .00 2.00 MAINTENANCE WORKER I (FLEX) 25.00 1 9.00 6.00 MAINTENANCE WORKER II 4.00 2 .00 2.00 MAINTENANCE WORKER III 6.00 3 .00 3.00 MANAGEMENT ANALYST I (FLEX) 7.00 6 .00 1.00 MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 2.00 2 .00 - MARKETING & MEDIA SPECIALIST 1.00 - 1.00 MARKETING & PUBLIC RELATIONS SPECIALIST 1.00 1 .00 - MAYOR 1.00 1 .00 - NEIGHBORHOOD & CUSTOMER SVCS MGR (U) 1.00 1 .00 - NPDES INSPECTOR I (FLEX) 1.00 1 .00 -

Packet Pg.
659

NPDES INSPECTOR II 1.00 1 .00 - NPDES MANAGER 1.00 1 .00 - OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DIVISION MANAGER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 7.00 5 .00 2.00 PARKS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - PARKS MAINTENANCE WORKER II 2.00 2 .00 - PAYROLL SUPERVISOR 1.00 - 1.00 PERMIT SERVICES SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - PLANNING AIDE 1.00 1 .00 - PLANNING DIVISION MANAGER (U) 1.00 - 1.00 PLANS EXAMINER I (FLEX) 1.00 - 1.00 PLANS EXAMINER II 1.00 - 1.00 PLUMBER 1.00 1 .00 - POLICE CAPTAIN (U) 3.00 3 .00 - POLICE DISPATCH SUPERVISOR 4.00 4 .00 - POLICE DISPATCHER I (FLEX) 8.00 8 .00 - POLICE DISPATCHER II 18.00 1 4.00 4.00 POLICE FLEET MAINTENANCE EXPEDITOR 1.00 1 .00 - POLICE OFFICER 193.00 163. 00 30.00 POLICE P&T TECHNICIAN 2.00 2 .00 - POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR 2.00 2 .00 - POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) 9.00 6 .00 3.00 POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN II 10.00 1 0.00 - POOL MAINTENANCE COORDINATOR 1.00 1 .00 - PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER 1.00 - 1.00 PROCUREMENT CONTRACT SPECIALIST 1.00 1 .00 - PROJECT MANAGER OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS (U) 1.00 1 .00 - PROPERTY & EVIDENCE SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) 2.00 2 .00 - PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR I (FLEX) 2.00 2 .00 - PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR II 2.00 2 .00 - PUBLIC WORKS SAFETY AND TRAINING OFFICER 1.00 1 .00 - PURCHASING DIVISION MANAGER (U) 1.00 1 .00 - REAL PROPERTY MANAGER 2.00 2 .00 - RECORDS MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST (U) 1.00 - 1.00 REGISTERED VETERINARY TECHNICIAN 1.00 - 1.00 SENIOR ANIMAL SERVICES REP. 6.00 6 .00 -

Packet Pg.
660

SENIOR ARBORIST 1.00 1 .00 - SENIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE REP. (BIL) 4.00 4 .00 - SENIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE 1.00 1 .00 - SENIOR GIS ANALYST 1.00 1 .00 - SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN 2.00 2 .00 - SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK ANALYST 3.00 2 .00 1.00 SENIOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST 3.00 3 .00 - SENIOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN 1.00 1 .00 - SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 7.00 7 .00 - SENIOR NETWORK SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR 1.00 1 .00 - SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT 5.00 5 .00 - SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT (U) 2.00 2 .00 - SENIOR PLANNER 2.00 1 .00 1.00 SERGEANT 43.00 4 3.00 - SHELTER VETERINARIAN 1.00 - 1.00 SOLID WASTE FIELD INSPECTOR 1.00 1 .00 - STATION MANAGER 1.00 1 .00 - TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIAN 1.00 1 .00 - TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1.00 1 .00 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 2.00 2 .00 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND LIGHTING SUPERVISOR 1.00 1 .00 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) 1.00 - 1.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN II 2.00 1 .00 1.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN III 1.00 - 1.00 TREASURY MANAGER 1.00 - 1.00 VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR (GRANT FUNDED) 3.00 2 .00 1.00 Total 822.00 705.00 117.00
Position Control numbers are as of May 19, 2023.

Packet Pg.
661

Priority
Funding Source
• 6 1 CDBG, Cult Development, Donation Fund
• 1 3 General Fund
• 1 1 Public Use Facility
• 7 2 Library Facility
• 1 1 CDBG
• 1 1 Measure S
• 1 1 Measure S
• 1 1 Measure S
• 1 2 Library Facility
• 2 1 Cultural Development Fund
• 1 1 Public Use Facility
• 1 1 Public Use Facility
• 1 1 Law Enforcement Facility
• 1 1 Law Enforcement Facility
• 1 1 Public Use Facility
• 1 1 Grant (CA Art Council grant)
• 1 1 Measure S
• 6 3 Cultural Development Fund
• 6 1 CDBG, ARP, Liability Insurance Fund
• 4 1 AB 1600 Parkland
• 7 1 AB 1600 Parkland
• 1 1 Measure S
• 2 1 Measure S
• 1 1 Measure S / ARPA
• ALL 1 Measure S
• 4 2 Measure S
• 1 1 Measure S
• ALL 1 Measure S
• 2, 3 1 Measure S
• 2 1 Measure S
• 1 1 ARP
• 1 1 San Manuel Grant
• 3 1 ARP
• 1 2 ARP
• 2 2 Measure S
• 2 2 ARP
• ALL 2 Aquatics Facilities
• 1 2 AB 1600 Parkland
• 2 1 Measure S
• All 1 Cultural Development Fund
• All 1 Measure S
• 1 1 ARPA
• 1 4 Measure S
• 7 1 ARPA / San Manuel Grant
• 1 1 Cultural Development Fund
• ALL 1 Storm Drain Construction Fund
• 6 1 Storm Drain Construction Fund
• 4 1 Storm Drain Construction Fund
• ALL 1 Storm Drain Construction Fund
• 7 1 Storm Drain Construction Fund
• 5 1 Storm Drain Construction
• 1, 3 1 Regional Circulation
• 4 1 Regional Circulation
• 5, 6 1 Measure I
• 1, 6 1 Regional Circulation
• 4 1 Regional Circulation / Measure I
• 4 1 Regional Circulation
-$
Mt Vernon Bridge Replacement Construction 2,916,050 $
-$ -$
State St Extension - Phase 1. 16th St to Baseline Rd Planning 6,680,348 $ 5,039,786$ - $ 5th St Senior Center Upgrade / Automatic Doors at Community Centers/Libraries Design 693,831 $ - $ -$ -$ Paul Villasenor Library Parking Lot & Roof
Project Status
Estimated
Remaining
Funding to
Carryover
Planning Fiscal Years 2023-2027
FY 22-23 FY 23-24 FY24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27Capital Improvement Plan StreetsParksBuildingsTraffic ControlWardOther
-$ -$ -$ ADA Restrooms Villasenor & Rowe Library Design 386,296 $ - $ - $ Ruben Campos Community Center: Parking Lot Slurry Seal Planning 625,000 $ Annual Facilities Replacement Design - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ Encanto Community Center Improvements Design 3,385,814 $ - $ -$ -$
5th St Senior Center Kitchen Phase 2 Construction 47,586 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ Feldheym Improvements Planning 150,000 $ 150,000$ 400,000$ - $ -$ -$ New Animal Shelter Design 338,233 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ Construction 128,925$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$
City Hall Server Room Improvements Planning 24,670 $ 221,375$ - $ -$ -$ -$ Perris Hill Senior Center Roof Replacement Planning 248,915 $ 250,000$ - $ -$ Planning 2,370,431 $ - $ -$ -$ 2,370,431$ 36,166$
500,000$ 500,000$ - $ Nicholson Neighborhood Park Improvements Design 9,761,486 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ One Stop Permitting Center Planning 400,000 $ 400,000$ - $ -$ California Theater Renovations (Improvements) Planning 2,353,513 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 36,166$ - $
-$ -$
Speicher Park Field Lighting Design 216,394 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ Newmark Ball Field Lighting Systems Design 554,000 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$
Perris Hill YMCA Parking Lot Improvements Design 663,637 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ Pioneer Cemetery & Seccombe Lake Improvements Construction 267,566 $ - $ -$ -$ Wildwood Park Improvements - $ Design 82,617$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Citywide Park Restroom Renovations Design 996,925 $ - $ -$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ Roosevelt Bowl Renovation Design 1,200,000 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$
Ball Field Accessory Building Upgrade Design 2,000,000 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ Citywide Irrigation System Upgrade Design 250,000 $ - $ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
Hernandez Community Center Fencing Construction 250,000 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ Wildwood Park & Encanto Park - Phase 1 Baseball/Softball field repair Design 989,663 $ - $ -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$
Lytle Creek Parking Lot/Soccer Field Planning 600,000 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ Seccombe Lake Park Improvements (ARP) Planning 8,998,970 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Seccombe Lake Park Improvements (Grant) Planning 899,450 $ - $ -$ -$
Perris Hill Senior Center Renovation Planning 400,000 $ 400,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ Norton Gym Pickleball Courts Planning - $ -$ 1,200,000$ - $ -$ -$ Jerry Lewis Swim Center Improvements Planning 37,831 $ 190,000$ 500,000$ 750,000$ 400,000$ - $
Bobby Vega Park Improvement Planning 250,000 $ 250,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ Pool Filtration Systems Improvements Planning - $ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$
266,771$ - $
Construction 1,185,126$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ Mt Vernon Storm Drain 3,000,000 $ - $ -$ Storm Drain Upgrade SD 19-002
749,272$ 501,057$ - $ -$ -$
500,000$ - $
-$ 2,000,000$ - $ -$ -$ 1,425,000$ 1,225,000$ 750,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
793,327$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,896,278$ - $ -$ -$ City of San Bernardino Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - All Projects Investing in the Future of San Bernardino
6,151,089$ Design
Sierra Way Storm Drain; SD23-001 Planning 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000$ - $ -$ - $ -$ Storm Drains
Speicher Park, East Side Skate Park renovation
Conejo Between 39th St and 40th St Planning 233,229 $
500,000$ 500,000$
Citywide Storm drain Trash Capture Devices - TMDLS-Track 1 Design Parks Master Plan (Measure S) Planning 750,000 $ 750,000$ - $ -$ -$ 2nd St Bridge Replacement Construction
H St Kendall to 40th Widening Design
250,195$
40th St Widening Johnson to Electric Design 1,766,539 $ Meyers Creek Focused Drainage Study* Planning 266,771$
University Parkway Improvements Design 1,944,864 $
Planning Sal Saavedra Renovations: Guadalupe Field Upgrades 995,000 $ 995,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ Planning 600,000$ 650,000$
Parks Master Plan (Cultural Development Fund) Planning
Speicher Park Ballfield Improvements* Planning 1,938,410$ 1,950,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$
Police Building Management System Planning 350,000 $ 350,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ Police Locker Room Renovation
-$ -$ 3,500,000$ - $ -$ Planning - $
-$
Delmann Heights Community Center Upgrade Construction
Carousel Mall Demolition* Planning 8,084,000$ 8,084,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Regal Theater AC Unit Replacements Planning 356,947 $ 389,693$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ California Theater Renovations (Improvements)*
-$ -$
-$
Norton Gym : Facility Upgrades; Public Service Academy* Planning 30,000$ 30,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$

Packet Pg.
662

Priority
Funding Source
Project Status
Estimated
Remaining
Funding to
Carryover
Planning Fiscal Years 2023-2027
FY 22-23 FY 23-24 FY24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27Capital Improvement Plan StreetsParksBuildingsTraffic ControlWardOther
City of San Bernardino Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - All Projects Investing in the Future of San Bernardino
Storm Drains
• 1, 4 1 Measure I
• ALL 1 Measure S
• ALL 1 Measure S
• ALL 1 SB1
• ALL 1 Measure I
• ALL 1 Measure S
• 3, 6 1 Measure I
• 1,2,3,6 &71 Measure I
• 1, 4, 7 1 CDBG
• 4, 5, 7 2 Measure S
• 2 2 Measure S
• 2 2 Measure S
• 2 2 Measure S
• 2 2 Measure S
• 7 2 Measure S
• 7 2 Measure S
• ALL 1 Measure I
• ALL 1 Grant
•
1,4,3 1 CDBG
• All 1 Measure S
• ALL 1 Grant
• ALL 1 Measure I
• ALL 1 Measure I
• ALL 1
• ALL 1 Local Regional Circulation
• ALL 1 Local Regional Circulation
• ALL 1 HSIP Grant
• ALL 1 HSIP Grant
• 3 1 Local Regional Circulation
• 1, 3 1 Local Regional Circulation
• 3 1 Local Regional Circulation
• 2 1 Local Regional Circulation
• ALL 2 Measure S
• 2 1 Measure S
• 7 2 Measure S
• 4 2 Measure S
• 3 Local Regional Circulation / Measure I
• 3 1 Integrated Waste Management Fund
3,650,000$ 4,050,000$ 124,803,026$ 61,191,285$ 10,050,000 $ 9,126,057$ Cross Street Bridge Planning - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Signal Hardware Upgrade - 224 signalized intersections Construction 1,588,000 $ - $ -$ Traffic Management Center SS17-003
Citywide Street Lighting Upgrades Construction 415,078 $ -$ -$
Design
1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$
CO OP City of Highland SS19-002 Construction 2,074,817$ 100,000$ -$ -$ Street Rehabilitation CDBG, Wall St, 18th St, 13th St Construction 1,680,064 $ 1,600,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$
Street Rehabilitation County Partner - Lynwood Ave, Citrus Ave, Blake St, Third St, North SB Curb Ramps, Arden Ave Design 1,371,000$ 1,000,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ Pepper Ave Rehabilitation Design 7,466,027 $ 7,500,000$ - $ Virginia St from E to F/G to H Completed 508 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Congress Street from Mt Vernon to K St Construction 325,000 $ - $ -$ -$ Construction Median Kendall Dr from E St to H St Design 914,055 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ Cedar Street from Highland to 29th Completed - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Trenton from Crestview to Valencia Completed 204 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Hillside and Fairfax repaving Completed 102 $ -$ -$ -$ Arden Street (By Soccer Field) Construction 325,000 $ - $ -$ -$ -$
Waterman Ave & 21st Traffic Signal Upgrade Construction 60,000 $ - $ -$ -$ -$ Mt Vernon & Rialto Traffic Signal Upgrade
Mt Vernon & Walnut Traffic Signal Upgrade Construction
361,472$ - $ -$ -$ 17,426$
Solar Powered Street Light Improvements E St. Baseline-Highland Construction 35,000 $ 10,070$ - $ -$ Genevieve Circuit Lighting Design 362,853 $ - $ -$
Ralston Circuit Lighting Design
-$ -$ -$ -$
Construction 44,420$
-$ -$
-$ -$
3,275,592$
Planning
1,678,787$ 1,600,000$
-$ -$
-$ 1,000,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$
-$
Planning 720,322$ 722,722$ - $ -$
Rancho Rd & Rialto Traffic Signal Upgrade
Traffic Signal Battery Backup Systems (Annual) TC-B Construction 59,674 $ 50,000$ - $ -$ 1,000,000$
Alley Rehabilitation (Clean California Local Grant) - $ -$
Street Rehabilitation Project (Pavement):
10th Street from F Street to G Street
49th Street from Sepulveda Avenue to end
Rialto Avenue from Mt. Vernon to Muscott
-$ -$
-$
Arrowhead Farm Area Street Rehab* Planning 490,000$ 490,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$
-$
-$
-$ -$
57,274$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$
968,455$
Waterman Landfill Vapor Extraction System Improvements Planning 3,633$
4,438,546$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 43,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$
-$
Citywide Bus Stop Improvements Project (Measure I Grant Match) Construction -$
-$
-$ -$
-$ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$
Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection - 49 signalized intersections Design 7,019,160 $ 3,000,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ Construction
17,980$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Construction 7,426$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$
40,000$
-$ -$ -$ * NEW PROJECT ADDED IN FY 2022/23
-$ -$ 1,250,000$ - $ -$ Citywide Pavement Rejuvenation Slurry/Crack Seal - (Measure S) Citywide Street Rehab - (SB1) King St, High Ave, K St.

Street Sweeping Signage Program Planning 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000$ Mill and K Street Traffic Signal Upgrade Construction
42,426$
Citywide Pavement Rejuvenation Slurry/Crack Seal - (Measure I) Design 1,350,000$
6,074,630$ Construction
Construction Citywide Street Rehab - (Measure S) King St, High Ave, K St.

Citywide Street Rehab - (Measure S) Temple St, Acacia St, Prospect Ave Planning -$
-$
-$
1,000,000$
-$
-$ -$
-$ -$
1,000,000$
2,000,000$
5,000,000$
Citywide Bus Stop Improvements Project - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Completed -$
New Pavement Management Program
Planning

Packet Pg.
663

← All documents from this meeting