RFP F-23-58 Grant Administrative Services Evaluation Matrix Weight
Factors
Criteria: E-TP E-MAG E-CT Total E-TP E-MAG E-CT Total
6 6 8 7 42 6 9 7 44
Part 1
1. Brief General Statement of intent to perform services
2. Did they confirm that all elements of the RFP have been reviewed and understood.
3. Brief Summary of Company's qualifications
6 8 7 21 6 9 8 23
Part 2
1. Contact's person information, address, telephone number
2. Identity of type of organization
3. Supplemental information that is pertinent to the selection process.
4.Demonstrated an understanding of the Services presented
5. Does it describe the general approach, organization and staffing required for the services required
7 8 6 21 7 8 8 23
Part 3
1. Company's willingness to enter into a contract under the T&C's prescribed in RFP and Proposed
Agreement
2. Were any exceptions or deviations submitted for Technical or Contractual specifications
3. Were proposed alternative approaches to meeting the City's technical/contractual requirements
thoroughly explained
6 8 7 21 6 8 6 20
Part 4
1.Did the Respondent submit the proposal based on the format noted in RFP
2.Did Respondent submit a response in the box or an attachment?
3.Did an authorized representative sign the response box? 6 8 6 20 6 8 6 20
Part 5
1. A litigation, mediation, or arbitration, regarding the performance of any services similar to the
services the company has been involved with in the past (5) years.
2. Were any claims or disciplinary action taken against the Company or any of the Company's key
personnel within the past five (5) years.
3. Has the company filed for bankruptcy under any business name over the past five (5) years
6 8 6 20 6 9 6 21
Experience and Technical Competence
- Did the vendor's Description of how their experience, technical and professional skills will meet the goals, fulfill the general functions identified in this RFP? - Did the vendor provide the number of years their firm has conducted business? Does Proposer have at least 4 year's experience in providing the required scope of services for public clients?
- Is the vendor have local experience and knowledge of City. 7 8 8 23 8 9 8 25
Project Specific Experience
- Role of the Firm
- Description of Services
- Staffing
- Duration of providing services
- Relationship to Client
- Contact name, position, entity name, telephone number, fax number and email address for each project.
6 8 7 21 6 9 8 23
Overall Cost to the City (Grant Administrative Services Evaluation Matrix) 40 4 4 4 16 10 10 10 40
Clarification/Exceptions/Deviations
Pass/Fail
Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Finanical Status
Pass/Fail
Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Credential/ Resumes/ Licenses/ Certifications Yes/No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes GRAND TOTALS 100 58 84
Evaluation Scores for "Cost"
Michael Baker International 243,919.00$
Willdan Engineering 337,331.00$
Lowest Cost get full 40 weighted cost for Michael Baker 40 Lowest Cost Divided by the 2nd lowest cost is how cost is scored 1 Take 0.1 x the weighted cost of 40 and then you get the score for Willdan Engineering 0.1 x 40 = 16 4 40 Points Awarded for Costs
16 Michael Baker International
Total Group Score:
How Weighted Scores for Cost are Calculated
Willdan Engineering
Total Group Score: