Cities Index.
Attachment 1 - Council Update 3.7.24

Mayor and City Council
April 3, 2024

Document
Attachment 1 - Council Update 3.7.24
Meeting
April 3, 2024
Body
Mayor and City Council
Original file
9.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sanbernardino.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

City of San Bernardino Parks Master Plan Findings
March 2024
Who Are We?
200+ Strategic and Master Plans / 30+ in California National and Local (Riverside based)20% of CAPRA + Gold Medal WinnersWork - 6 continents

10-Minute Walk

Population
210,226222,101220,812221,458227,328 230,870 0.56%-0.29%0.06%0.53%0.31%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%195,000200,000205,000210,000215,000220,000225,000230,000235,0002010Census2020Census2022Estimate2027Projection2032Projection2037ProjectionTotal PopulationPopulation Annual Growth Rate Race/Ethnicity
46%24%24%21%11%4%15%13%12%12%11%10%4%4%4%5%5%5%29%40%40%42%47%51%5%17%17%17%23%26%2010Census2020Census2022Estimate2027Projection2032Projection2037Projection White AloneBlack AloneAmerican IndianAsianPacific IslanderSome Other RaceTwo or More Races60%68%69%76%40%32%31%24%2010Census2020Census2022Estimate2037Projection Hispanic / Latino Origin (any race)All Others
Age Segments
32%29% 29%28%27%27%29%26%27%27%25%22%24%22%22%13%16%16%17%18%4%4%5%5%5%2010Census2022Estimate2027Projection2032Projection2037Projection 0-1718-3435-5455-7475+
Income Levels
$20,646 $44,265 $40,363 $52,415 $88,930 $72,414 San Bernardino City, CA California United StatesPer Capita IncomeMedian Household Income OutcomesTrendsStaffing and Funding Needs Community PrioritiesRecommendationsShort, Mid, Long Range PlanMission, Vision, Values Our Approach
- Our Fundamental Community Input Philosophy
Phase 1: Discover

www.MySBParks.com

Public Meetings

Statistically-Valid SurveyOnly scientific & defensible method to understand community needsAdministered by mail/phone/webDeveloped in partnership with the staff 419 responses (goal of 400)95% level of confidence with a margin of error of +/- 4.8%

Phase 2: Envision

Park and Facility Assessments

GREAT 4-5Site amenities are in excellent condition with little or no maintenance problems noted. GOOD 3Site amenities are in good condition and feature only minor maintenance problems. Amenity maintenance issues appear to be the result of age and heavy use. FAIR 2Site amenities are in fair condition and indicate ongoing maintenance issues. Generally, most amenity maintenance issues appear to be the result of age and heavy use. POOR 0-1Site amenities are in poor condition and clearly show ongoing maintenance problems that ultimately may result in suspended use for repair or replacement.

Park Rating CategoriesACCESS AND CONNECTIVITYAdjacent trails or trailheads, street crossings, sidewalks, park circulation, signage, general accessibilityCONDITION AND FUNCTIONALITYIndividual amenities, tree canopy, other vegetation types and appearance, state of paved surfaces, lighting and furnitureSAFETY AND COMFORTVisibility/ sightlines, active use, lighting, evidence of misuse, ease of navigation, road adjacency, any physical hazards, edges of slopesMAINTENANCEConcerns for the continued success of park

Low Assessment Score (Below 1.5)Nicholson Park 0.83Norton Gym 0.85Golden Valley School Field 0.99Campo Santo Cemetery/Park 1.26Horine Park 1.33Encanto Park 1.35Delmann Heights Park 1.41Tom Gould Park 1.43Del Rosa School Field 1.48Moderate Assessment Score (Between 1.5 and 2.5)Guiterrez Field 1.53Ronald Reagan Park 1.53Palm Field 1.53Meadowbrook Park 1.59Meadowbrook Fields 1.61Seccombe Lake Park 1.61Richardson School Field 1.63Bobby Vega Park 1.65Guadalupe Field 1.65 Moderate cont.Wildwood Park 1.66Nunez Park 1.70Del Vallejo School Field 1.84La Plaza Park 1.95Lytle Creek Park 1.99Perris Hill Park 1.99Harrison Canyon Park 2.00Newberry Memorial Park 2.00Littlefield Shultis Park 2.05Tom Minor Park 2.14Lionel E Hudson Park 2.21Jack Reily Park 2.22Freddie Spellacy Park 2.26Speicher Park 2.26Al Guhin Park 2.36SB Soccer Complex 2.38Anne Shirrells Park 2.39Newmark Field 2.44High Assessment Score (Above 2.5)Blair Park 2.53Bryce Hanes Park 2.64Colony Park 3.26 Aquatics Design Group: Assessed all City of San Bernardino recreational bodies of water: pools, splash pads, water slide & spaOPERATIONAL NOT OPERATIONALThe Jerry Lewis Family Swim Center The Hernandez Pool / The Dellmann Heights PoolThe Center for Individual Development (CID) Pool The Encanto Pool / The Nunez Pool The Jerry Lewis Family Swim CenterThe CID Pool
The Encanto Pool
Aquatics Needs Assessment

1. They need repairs to continue to serve safely and effectively. 2. Significant costs required to rectify code and maintenance items at each facility. Additional dollars needed to modernize or update. 3. Rising construction costs make the total cost of bringing all the facilities back online more unrealistic. 4. Consider consolidating the number of City aquatic facilities to focus on newer and fewer: reduce operating costs and provide residents better experiences Aquatics Needs Assessment
Phase 3: Develop

GIS Based Equity Mapping

Next StepsLevels of ServiceGIS based Equity MappingFunding and StaffingVisioning and Action Plan

Thank you!!!Gracias!!!

← All documents from this meeting