ARNARDING
Pavement Management Program
An Introduction
City of San Bernardino
City Council Meeting
April 16th, 2025
Presenter: Vivek Jha, P.E., M.S.
Principal/Southern California Operations Manager
Firm Name: NCE
Meeting Agenda
SEATED IN NO
• What is Pavement
Management Program?
• How is the City performing
Pavement Management
Program?
• What else is the City doing as
part of the Pavement
Management Program?
• When will the Project be
completed?
NCE Overview
LE AREA IN IRO
Over 200 PMP Clients
•Performed similar PMP projects for over 90 cities and
counties in Southern California
•Performs annual distress and PMP software training
on behalf of OCTA
oPerform StreetSaver Training on behalf of MTC
Certified (MTC &/or OCTA) Field Inspectors
•Rigorous Quality Control (QC) Practices
AVEMENT T
Surveyed over 120,000 miles of pavements
Multiple Automated Surveys Data Collection Vehicles Arrb o Testing vehicle has been certified by OCTA and MTC
though the Vendor Certification Program (VCP)
National Expertise in Pavement Technology
oInnovative pavement strategies with sustainable
options
BERHARDIND
Transforming Infrastructure Management
Key Benefits:
• Comprehensive asset understanding
Data-driven decision making
Proactive maintenance planning
• Resource optimization
166R
Billin
What is Pavement Management Program?
• Approach used to make cost-effective
19.76 39.83 174
decisions.
• It answers 4 main questions:
• What streets does the City
Other - PC 78
PCI 76'
own/maintain?
HONEST -POCTI
• What condition are the streets in? A 76tiND- 12/31/2024 • What repairs are needed and when?
• How much funding is needed to maintain
or improve streets?
• It typically employs software RSL 26
(StreetSaver® or MicroPaver™) + 25 госе 12/31/2024
Pavement Management Program
Develop Input Perform Prepare
Inventory Maintenance Budget Needs Final Report
Records Analysis
Perform Develop Perform Develop
Condition Maintenance Budget Implementation
Survey Decision Tree Scenarios Ready
Workplan
City's Inventory
Pavement
Section Centerline Lane
Functional Class # of Sections Area Pavement
Mileage Mileage Miles
(Sqft) Area
Arterial/Collector 1,928 296.2 207.7 629.2 57,001,394 47% Residential/Local 3,161 350.7 349.3 701.3 63,540,319 53% Total 5,089 646.9 557.0 1,330.5 120,541,713 100%
Rialto
Redlands
SPHARDINORE What is PCI?
HEADED NARRO Condition Category Pavement Condition PCI
100
Very Good
70 (II/III) Fair (Non-Load) Fair (Load-related)
50 (II/III) Poor
25 (ПІ/ШІІ) Very Poor
PCI: 93 PCI: 59
PCI: 23
Comparison to Neighboring Agencies
HEADED NARRO
100
[Statewide PCI is 65
90 78 81
80 78
72 74
69 70
66 63. 64 -L-L -
Network PCI
20 10
Highland Colton San Rancho Fontana Loma Linda Rialto Ontario Upland San Bernardino Cucamonga Bernardino
County
Agencies
What Do We Need for PCI/PMP?
Data Collection Tools
Detection Models
LiDAR Scanner
High-Resolution Camera • Distress Detection
High-Accuracy GPS Asset Detection
Distance Measuring Instrument •-
Quality Assurance
Support Teams
- Pavement Expertise
Robust GIS Team •• QA/QC Processes
Programming Team •-
Data Collection Team
Trained, Experienced,
and Certified
Data Collection Vehicle
PAVEMENT
MANAGEMENT
INTELLIGENCE
CYRD
* SYSTEMS NSV-2
Pavement Stress Identification
EXONTENT Citywide PCI Condition
Very Poor 60.0% 0.1%
PCI 0-24
0. 1% 4.9%
50.0%
Poor
PCI 25-49 Very Good
6.7% PCI 86-100 40.0% 21.0%
18.5%
30.0% 1.4%
Citywide 0.4%
Fair 20.0% 10.7% 22.0%
Network
PC| 50-69 Condition
7.6%
39.3% 10.0% 7.7%
5.7% 8.7%
Good 6.4% 3.4%
PCI 70-85 0.0%
35.4% Arterial Collector Local
(26.2%) (17.1%) (56.7%)
• Very Good Good Fair Poor = Very Poor
Typical Treatment Strategies based on PCI
100
No Repairs
Very Good
Needed
86-100 90
Repair Cost
Good 80 Preventive $0.40 /Square Feet
70-85 Maintenance
70 Repair Cost
Fair Minor $2-$4/Square Feet
50-69 60 Resurfacing
50 Pavement Condition Index Repair Cost
Poor 40 Major $4-$6/Square Feet
25-49 Resurfacing
30 20 Repair Cost
Very Poor $8-$12 /Square Feet
Reconstruction
0-24
35% 75% 90%
Percent of Pavement Service Life
-Untreated PCI (No maintenance performed) |
- S3: All Streets that Need Treatment *- S2: Maintain Minimum 71 PCI - S1B: Worst Streets First - 51: City's Existing Funding Treatment
62,745,646 2034 2033 2032 2031 2030 2029 2028 2027 2025 2025 Current 2024 293.6 Need
40 All Streets that
45 PCI 50
49,758,352 241.2 Minimum 71
55 Maintain
8 First 68
25,866,270 117.1 Worst Streets 1B
71 46,810,937 225.6 Funding
City's Existing - 80
Treated
Area (SF) Miles Treated Description
Scenario
Pavement Centerline
100
Budget Scenarios
Budget Scenarios
194.5 • Very Good Good •Poor • Very Poor
202.0- 6.7% 0.1%
181.5
Current Condition 18.5% 35.4% 39.3%
10.5% |7.5%
S1: City's Existing Funding 15.5% 55.5% 11.0%
Deferred Maintenane (SM) 113.2
Planned 76.0 15.7%- 2.1%
100 Work
S1B: Worst Streets First 10.5% 46.1% 25.6%
9.1% 6.4%
S2: Maintain Minimum 71 PC| 16.7% 57.9% 9.9%
0 . 2.5% 0.0%
2026 2027 2030 S3: All Streets that Need
Current 2024 2025 20282029 2031 2032 2033 2034 18.8% 69.2% 9.5% Treatment
Year End
0% 20% 40% 60% 100%
• S1: City's Existing Funding • S1B: Worst Streets First Percent of Network
• S2: Maintain Minimum 71 PCI • S3: All Streets that Need Treatment Pavement Condition -
Annual Deferred Maintenance by Scenario End of Analysis Period Street ROW Asset Inventory
CINDED HEROE
Guide Signa Bicycia Route
31001a128 →
Iraffic Signal
Traffe Signal
Street Light
lestrian Signal
Speed Check
Speed Limit
Keep Right.
Object Marker
Curb Marking Broken Lane Mal Bike Lane
Croas Walk
Stop Linc Sidewalk
Pavement Curb Curb Ramp
MERNARDINO
Street ROW Asset Inventory
MUTCD - Regulatory Signs,
Barricades, And Gates
Details
Asset ID S-0879
Assembly ID A-0484
CA MUTCD Code R3-7R
High-resolution Right-of-
CA MUTCD Name Right (Left) Lane
Must Turn Right
(Left)
comprehensive assetor Sign Text RIGHT LANE MUST
TURN RIGHT
Sign Condition Good
visualization
Sign Orientation Forward Facing
Sign Width (in)
Sign Height (in)
Mount Height (in) 85
Al-powered machine Sign Order
Cardinal Direction EAST
learning algorithms for Post Type Ground Mounted
Post Material
automated asset Post Condition
Post Count
recognition Sign Count
Street Name CARSON ST
Address Carson Street.
Hawailan Gardens.
CA 90716, US
Automated data extraction The sign has no
visible damage.
and classification to
Media
streamline asset inventory
Street ROW Asset Inventory
Length of Road Network (mi) Number of Traffic Signs
16,602
Number of Driveway Apron Number of Light Poste
(239) 17,989 6580
Number of Curb Ramps Number of No Curb Ramps
Cly Ol So do Marie hand Meteo 4525 309
Vumber of Pavement Markings Length of Lane Markings (mi.) 6757 256
Length of Sidewalk (mi.) Length of Curb Markings (mi.)
326 357
Tul:5gs Anne Cambined
Street ROW Asset Inventory
CA MUTCD - Regulatory
Signs, Barricades, and Gates
Asset iD 5-0324
Assembly ID
CA MUTCO Code R32C (CA))
CA MUTCO Name 2 Hour Parking
Am To Ee
District 7 Permies
Sign Test 3 HOUR PARKING
Coor
Sign Orientatien Forward Facing
Sign Width (in)
Hen Height (in)
Light Post
Post Condition
va Coun
ign Count
treet Name
215ch Street.
Hawalan Gardens,
The sign has no
visible damage.
F0002010_POST_ CROP_S-13MLA
0804 p:
F0002050_VIS_S-1336_1-0804 jps)
Schedule
PMP Data Buildup Pavement Condition Pavement Condition
- Complete Assessment Assessment
• Identifying the • Data Collection to • Data Analysis - June Streets Owned by Begin - April 3 30 - August 29,
the City • Data Collection to 2025
• Determining the End - April 30, 2025 • Draft PCI Report - Pavement area • PCI Assessment - August 29, 2025
• Setting up database June 25, 2025
in StreetSaver
a Utility Cut Impact Study (Not in Current SOW)
Question 1: How do utility cuts affect pavement performance? Question 2: If pavement performance is reduced, what is the corresponding financial impact? Question 3: Is the current restorations standard sufficient to cover the damage due to the cut? Utility Cut Impact Study: Typical Fee Ranges
Agency Criteria Fee, $/SF Study by
Anaheim PCI 3.60 - 11.60 NCE 2022
Davis Functional Class and PCI 1.04 - 1.51 NCE 2022
Pacifica Functional Class, Age of the Pavement, Cut Size 1.00 - 4.00 NCE 2021 Ukiah Functional Class, Age of the Pavement, Cut Size 0.50- 4.00 NCE 2021 Santa Barbara County (Draft) Functional Class, PCI, Cut Size NCE 2023 Covina (Draft) Functional Class, PCI, Cut Size NCE 2024 NCE 2024
Monterey Park (Draft) Functional Class, PCI, Cut Size
Under Review (Draft)
NCE 2024
South San Francisco (Draft) Functional Class, PCI, Cut Size (Draft)
NCE 2024
City of Riverside (Draft) Functional Class, PCI, Cut Size (Draft)
Questions?
ST
600 N
WELCOME S SAN BERNARDINO