Cities Index.
Attachment 3 CalVIP-4 Fully Executed Standard Agreement

Mayor and City Council
March 4, 2026

Document
Attachment 3 CalVIP-4 Fully Executed Standard Agreement
Meeting
March 4, 2026
Body
Mayor and City Council
Pages
4
Original file
2.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sanbernardino.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

BSCC STATE OF CALIFORNIA
/ CALIFORNIA BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
LINDA M. PENNER 2590 VENTURE OAKS WAY, SUITE 200 • SACRAMENTO CA 95833 • 916.445.5073 • BSCC.CA.GOV Chair
KATHLEEN T. HOWARD GAVIN NEWSOM
Executive Direator Governor
August 16, 2022
Robert Field, City Manager
City of San Bernardino
290 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92336
Subject: CalVIP Grant Agreement # BSCC 857-22
Dear Robert Field,
Enclosed is a copy of the fully executed contract between City of San Bernardino and the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) for funds awarded through the CalVIP Grant.

This document should be kept in your official project file. Please refer to Exhibit A, Scope of Work in the Grant Agreement for reporting requirements and Exhibit B, Budget Detail and Payment Provisions for grant funding reimbursement dates. Your project's invoices reports available on our website
http://www.bscc.ca.gov/s correctionsplanningandprograms/.

If you have technical questions or require assistance, you may contact Katrina Jackson, Field Representative, at (916) 618-7487 or [email protected]. The BSCC looks forward to our partnership to ensure the successful administration of your CalVIP Grant.

Sincerely,
Ricardo Digitally signed by Ricardo
Goodridge
Goodridge Date: 2022.08.19 16:22:46 -07'00'
Ricardo Goodridge
Deputy Director
Corrections Planning and Grant Programs Division
Enclosure
cc: David Miranda, Community Intervention Program Manager Annie Clark, Finance Analyst
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES SCO ID: 6227-BSCC85722 STANDARD AGREEMENT -AGREEMENT NUMBER PURCHASING AUTHORITY NUMBER (If Applicable) STD 213 (Rev 03/2018) BSCC 857-22 BSCC-5227

1. This Agreement is entered into between the Contracting Agency and the Contractor named below:

CONTRACTING AGENCY NAME

BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS

CONTRACTOR NAME
City of San Bernardino

2. The term of this Agreement is:

START DATE
JULY 1, 2022

THROUGH END DATE
DECEMBER 31, 2025

3. The maximum amount of this Agreement is:
$3,800,000.00

4. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following exhibits, attachments, and appendices which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement.

EXHIBITS TITLE PAGES
Exhibit A Scope of Work 3
Exhibit B Budget Detail and Payment Provisions 3
Exhibit C General Terms and Conditions (04/2017) 4
Exhibit D Special Terms and Conditions
Attachment 1* California Violence Intervention & Prevention Grant Request for Proposals Attachment 2 CalVIP Grant Proposal 22
Appendix A CalVIP Executive Steering Committee 1
Appendix B Criteria for Non-Governmental Organizations Receiving BSCC Program Funds 2 * This item is hereby incorporated by reference and can be viewed at: http://www.bscc.ca.gov/scpapcalvipgrant/ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES HERETO.

CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR NAME (If other than an individual, state whether a corporation, partnership, etc.) City of San Bernardino

CONTRACTOR BUSINESS ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
290 North D Street San Bernardino CA 92336

PRINTED NAME OF PERSON SIGNING TITLE
Robert Field City Manager

CONTRACTOR AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED
es twel 7/12/2022

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CONTRACTING AGENCY NAME

BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS

CONTRACTING AGENCY ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
2590 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 200 Sacramento CA - 95833

PRINTED NAME OF PERSON SIGNING TITLE
RICARDO GOODRIDGE Jeputy Directo
CONTRACTING AGENCY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE Aristaly signed by Ricardo Ricardo Goodridae Goodridge
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES APPROVAL: EXEMPT PER SCM, VOLUME 1, 'H. 4ODate: ate: 2022.08.19 16:23:33-07'00' City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 1 of 3 ends

EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF WORK

1. GRANT AGREEMENT - CALIFORNIA VIOLENCE AND INTERVENTION (CalVIP) GRANT the Grantee or Contractor).

2. PROJECT SUMMARY AND ADMINISTRATION
A. The Fiscal Year 2021-22 State Budget includes funding in the amount of $209 million for the ›alitornia Violence Intervention and Prevention (CalVIP) Grant Program, to be administered b! he Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC). California cities that are disproportionately impacted by violence and the community-based organizations that that serve the residents of those cities are eligible to apply for CalVIP grant funding.

The purpose of the CalVIP Grant is to improve public health and safety by supporting effective violence reduction initiatives in communities that are disproportionately impacted by violence, particularly group-member involved homicides, shootings, and aggravated assaults (Penal Code Sec. 14131(b)).

B. Grantee agrees to administer the project in accordance with Attachment 1: CalVIP Request for Proposals (incorporated by reference) and Attachment 2: CalVIP Grant Proposal, which are attached hereto and made part of this agreement.

3. PROJECT OFFICIALS
A. The BSCC's Executive Director or designee shall be the BSCC's representative for administration of the Grant Agreement and shall have authority to make determinations relatin o any controversies that may arise under or regarding the interpretation, performance, o payment for work performed under this Grant Agreement.

B. The Grantee's project officials shall be those identified as follows:

Authorized Officer with legal authority to sign:

Name: Robert Field
Title: City Manager
Address: 290 North D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401
Phone: (909) 384-5122
Designated Financial Officer authorized to receive warrants:

Name: Annie Clark
Title: Finance Analyst
Address: 201 North E Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401
Phone: (909) 384-7269
Email: [email protected]
Project Director authorized to administer the project:

Name: David Miranda
Title: Community Intervention Program Manager
Address: 290 North D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401
Phone: (909) 384-5122
Email: [email protected]
C. Either party may change its project representatives upon written notice to the other party.

Rev 04/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 2 of 3 ends

EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF WORK
D. By signing this Grant Agreement, the Authorized Officer listed above warrants that he or she has full legal authority to bind the entity for which he or she signs.

4. DATA COLLECTION
Grantees will be required to comply with all data collection and reporting requirements as described in Attachment 1: CalVIP Request for Proposals and Attachment 2: CalVIP Grant Proposal.

5. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
A. Grantee will submit quarterly progress reports in a format prescribed by the BSCC. These reports, which will describe progress made on program objectives and include required data, shall be submitted according to the following schedule:

Quarterly Progress Report Periods Due no later than:

1. July 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022 lovember 15, 202

2. October 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 ebruary 15, 202

3. January 1, 2023 to March 31, 2023 May 15, 2023

4. April 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 August 15, 2023
July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 November 15, 2023

6. October 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 February 15, 2024

7. January 1, 2024 to March 31, 2024 May 15, 2024

8. April 1, 2024 to June 30, 2024 August 15, 2024

9. July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024 November 15, 2024

10. October 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 February 15, 2025

11. January 1, 2025 to March 31, 2025 May 15, 2025

12. April 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 August 15, 2025
B. Evaluation Documents Due no later than:

1. Local Evaluation Plan January 3, 2023

2. Final Local Evaluation Report December 31, 2025
C. Other Due no later than:

Financial Audit Report December 31, 2025

6. PROJECT RECORDS
A. The Grantee shall establish an official file for the project. The file shall contain adequate documentation of all actions taken with respect to the project, including copies of this Grant Agreement, approved program/budget modifications, financial records and required reports.

B. The Grantee shall establish separate accounting records and maintain documents and other evidence sufficient to properly reflect the amount, receipt, and disposition of all project funds, including grant funds and any matching funds by the Grantee and the total cost of the project.

Source documentation includes copies of all awards, applications, approved modifications, financial records, and narrative reports.

C. Personnel and payroll records shall include the time and attendance reports for all individuals reimbursed under the grant, whether they are employed full-time or part-time. Time and effort reports are also required for all subcontractors and consultants.

D. The grantee shall maintain documentation of donated goods and/or services, including the basis for valuation.

Rev 04/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 3 of 3 ends

EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF WORK
E. Grantee agrees to protect records adequately from fire or other damage. When records are stored away from the Grantee's principal office, a written index of the location of records stored must be on hand and ready access must be assured.

F. All Grantee records relevant to the project must be preserved a minimum of three (3) years after closeout of the grant project and shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection, examination, monitoring, copying, excerpting, transcribing, and auditing by the BSCC or designees. If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit, or other action involving the records has been started before the expiration of the three-year period, the records must be retained until the completion of the action and resolution of all issues which arise from it or until the end of the regular three-year period, whichever is later.

7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
A. Existing law prohibits any grantee, subgrantee, partner or like party who participated on the CalVIP Executive Steering Committee (See Appendix A) from receiving funds from the CalVIP grants awarded under this RFP. Applicants who are awarded grants under this RFP are responsible for reviewing the CalVIP ESC membership roster (see Appendix A) and ensuring that no grant dollars are passed through to any entity represented by the members of the CalVIP ESC.

B. In cases of an actual conflict of interest with an ESC member, the Board may revoke the grant award and legal consequences could exist for the parties involved, including, but not limited to, repayment of the grant award.

8. FINANCIAL AUDIT
Grantees are required to provide the BSCC with a financial audit no later than the end of the contract term, December 31, 2025. The financial audit shall be performed by a Certified Public Accountant or a participating county or city auditor that is organizationally independent from the participating county's or city's project financial management functions. Expenses for this final audit may be reimbursed for actual costs up to $25,000.

Rev D4/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 1 of 3 ends

EXHIBIT B: BUDGET DETAIL AND PAYMENT PROVISIONS

1. INVOICING AND PAYMENTS
A. The Grantee shall be paid in quarterly in arrears by submitting an invoice (Form 201) to the BSCC that outlines actual expenditures claimed for the invoicing period.

Quarterly Invoicing Periods: Due no later than:

1. July 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022 November 15, 2022

2. October 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 February 15, 2023 January 1, 2023 to March 31, 2023

4. April 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 August 15, 2023

5. July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 November 15, 2023

6. October 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 February 15, 2024

7. January 1, 2024 to March 31, 2024 May 15, 2024

8. April 1, 2024 to June 30, 2024

9. July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024 November 15, 2024

10. October 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 February 15, 2025

11. January 1, 2025 to March 31, 2025 May 15, 2025

12. April 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 August 15, 2025
Final Invoicing Periods*: Due no later than:

13. July 1, 2025 to September 30, 2025 November 15, 2025

14. October 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025 February 15, 2026 *Note: Project activity period ends June 30, 2025. The period of July 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025 is for completion of Final Local Evaluation Report and financial audit only.

B. All project expenditures (excluding costs associated with the completion of the Final Local Evaluation Report and the financial audit) and all obligated match contributions must be incurred by the end of the grant project period, June 30, 2025, and included on the invoice due August 15, 2025. Project expenditures incurred after June 30, 2025 will not be reimbursed.

C. The Final Local Evaluation Report is due to BSCC by December 31, 2025. Expenditures incurred for the completion of the Final Local Evaluation Report : during the period of July 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025, must be submitted during the Final Invoicing Periods), with the final invoice due on February 15, 2026. Supporting fiscal documentation will be required for all expenditures claimed on during the Final Invoicing Periods and must be submitted with the final invoice.

D. The financial audit is due to BSCC by December 31, 2025. Expenditures incurred for the completion of the financial audit during the period of July 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025, must be submitted during the Final Invoicing Periods, with the final invoice due on February 15, 2026.

Supporting fiscal documentation will be required for all expenditures claimed during the Final Invoicing Periods and must be submitted with the final invoice.

D. Grantee shall submit an invoice to the BSCC each invoicing period, even if grant funds are not expended or requested during the invoicing period.

E. Upon the BSCC's request, supporting documentation must be submitted for project expenditures. Grantees are required to maintain supporting documentation for all expenditures on the project site for the life of the grant and make it readily available for review during BSC site visits. See Exhibit A. Scope of Work, Item 6. Project Records.

2. GRANT AMOUNT AND LIMITATION
Rev 04/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 2 of 3 ends

EXHIBIT B: BUDGET DETAIL AND PAYMENT PROVISIONS
A. In no event shall the BSCC be obligated to pay any amount in excess of the grant award.

Grantee waives any and all claims against the BSCC, and the State of California on account of project costs that may exceed the sum of the grant award.

B. Under no circumstance will a budget Item change be authorized that would cause the projec! to exceed the amount of the grant award identified in this Grant Agreement.

3. BUDGET CONTINGENCY CLAUSE
A. This grant agreement is valid through CalVIP funding generated from the General Fund. The Grantee agrees that the BSCC's obligation to pay any sum to the grantee under any provision of this agreement is contingent upon the availability of sufficient funding granted through the passage of Assembly Bill 129 (Statutes of 2021, Chapter 21), also known as the California Budget Act of 2021. It is mutually agreed that if the Budget Act of the current year and/or an subsequent years covered under this Grant Agreement does not appropriate sufficient fund BSCC shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever to Grantee or to furnish any other considerations under this Agreement and Grantee shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this Grant Agreement.

B. If CalVIP funding is reduced or falls below estimates contained within the CalVIP Request for Proposals, the BSCC shall have the option to either cancel this Grant Agreement with no liability reduced to un BSC or orave the option to occurring to the BSCC or offer an amendment to this agreement to the Grantee to reflect a C. If BSCC cancels the agreement pursuant to Paragraph 3(B) or Grantee does not agree to an amendment in accordance with the option provided by Paragraph 3(B), it is mutually agreed that the Grant Agreement shall have no further force and effect. In this event, the BSCC shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever to Grantee or to furnish any other considerations under this Agreement and Grantee shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this Grant Agreement except that Grantee shall be required to maintain all project records required by Paragraph 6 of Exhibit A for a period of three (3) years following the termination of this agreement.

4. PROJECT COSTS
A. Grantee is responsible for ensuring that actual expenditures are for eligible project costs. "Eligible" and "ineligible" project costs are set forth in the July 2020 BSCC Grant Administration Guide, which can be found under Quick Links here:
https://www.bscc.ca.gov/s correctionsplanningandprograms/ The provisions of the BSCC Grant Administration Guide are incorporated by reference into this agreement and Grantee shall be responsible for adhering to the requirements set forth therein.

To the extent any of the provisions of the BSCC Grant Administration Guide and this agreement conflict, the language in this agreement shall prevail.

B. Grantee is responsible for ensuring that invoices submitted to the BSCC claim actual expenditures for eligible project costs.

C. Grantee shall, upon demand, remit to the BSCC any grant funds not expended for eligible project costs or an amount equal to any grant funds expended by the Grantee in violation of the terms, provisions, conditions or commitments of this Grant Agreement.

D. Grant funds must be used to support new program activities or to augment existing funds that expand current program activities. Grant funds shall not replace (supplant) any federal, state and/or local funds that have been appropriated for the same purpose. Violations can result in Rev 04/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 3 of 3 ends

EXHIBIT B: BUDGET DETAIL AND PAYMENT PROVISIONS
recoupment of monies provided under this grantor suspension of future program funding through BSCC grants.

5. PROMPT PAYMENT CLAUSE
Payment will be made in accordance with, and within the time specified in, Government Code Chapter 4.5, commencing with Section 927.

6. WITHHOLDING OF GRANT DISBURSEMENTS
A. The BSCC may withhold all or any portion of the grant funds provided by this Grant Agreement in the event the Grantee has materially and substantially breached the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement.

B. At such time as the balance of state funds allocated to the Grantee reaches five percent (5%), the BSCC may withhold that amount as security, to be released to the Grantee upon compliance with all grant provisions, including:
1) submittal and approval of the final invoice;
2) submittal and approval of the final progress report; and 3) submittal and approval of any additional required reports, including but not limited to the Final Local Evaluation Report and the financial audit.

C. The BSCC will not reimburse Grantee for costs identified as ineligible for grant funding. If grant funds have been provided for costs subsequently deemed ineligible, the BSCC may either withhold an equal amount from future payments to the Grantee or require repayment of an equal amount to the State by the Grantee.

D. In the event that grant funds are withheld from the Grantee, the BSCC's Executive Director or designee shall notify the Grantee of the reasons for withholding and advise the Grantee of the time within which the Grantee may remedy the failure or violation leading to the withholding.

7. PROJECT BUDGET
A. B. C.

BSCC Budget Line Item Grant Funds Match Total (A+B)

1. Salaries and Benefits $0 $400,000 $400,000

2. Services and Supplies $0 $0 $0

3. Health and Wellness $0 $0 $0

4. Professional Services or Public $0 $0 $0
Agency Subcontracts

5. Non-Governmental Organization $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $6,800,000 (NGO) Subcontracts

6. Equipment/Fixed Assets $0 $0 $0

7. Project Evaluation $160,000 $0 $160,000

8. Financial Audit $25,000 $0 $25,000

9. Other (Travel, Training, etc.) $50,000 $0 $50,000

10. Indirect Costs $165,000 $0 $165,000
TOTALS $3,800,000 $3,800,000 $7,600,000
Rev 04/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 1 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT C: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS (04/2017)

1. APPROVAL: This Agreement is of no force or effect until signed by both parties and approved by the Department of General Services, if required. Contractor may not commence performance until such approval has been obtained.

2. AMENDMENT: No amendment or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No oral understanding or Agreement not incorporated in the Agreement is binding on any of the parties.

3. ASSIGNMENT: This Agreement is not assignable by the Contractor, either in whole or in part, without the consent of the State in the form of a formal written amendment.

4. AUDIT: Contractor agrees that the awarding department, the Department of General Services, the Bureau of State Audits, or their designated representative shall have the right to review and to copy ny recoros and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Agreemer ontractor agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three (3) years afte final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated. Contractor agrees to allow the auditors) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. Further, Contractor agrees to include a similar right of the State to audit records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of this Agreement. (Gov. Code §8546.7, Pub. Contract Code §10115 et seq., CCR Title 2, Section 1896).

5. INDEMNIFICATION: Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, laborers, and any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Agreement, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation who may be injured or damaged by Contractor in the performance of this Agreement.

6. DISPUTES: Contractor shall continue with the responsibilities under this Agreement during any dispute.

7. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The State may terminate this Agreement and be relieved of any payments should the Contractor fail to perform the requirements of this Agreement at the time and in the manner herein provided. In the event of such termination, the State may proceed with the work in any manner deemed proper by the State. All costs to the State shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Agreement and the balance, if any, shall be paid to the Contractor upon demand.

8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: Contractor, and the agents and employees of Contractor, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of the State.

9. RECYCLING CERTIFICATION: The Contractor shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury, the minimum, if not exact, percentage of post-consumer material as defined in the Public Contract Code Section 12200, in products, materials, goods, or supplies offered or sold to the State regardless of whether the product meets the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 12209. With respect to printer or duplication cartridges that comply with the requirements of Section 12156(e), the certification required by this subdivision shall specify that the cartridges so comply (Pub. Contract Code §12205).

10. NON-DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE: During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall not deny the contract's benefits to any person on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic Rev 04/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 2 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT C: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS (04/2017)
information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status, nor shall they discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status.

Contractor shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination. Contractor and subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12900 et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §11000 et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code (Gov. Code §§11135-11139.5), and the regulations or standards adopted by the awarding state agency to implement such article.

Contractor shall permit access by representatives of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the awarding state agency upon reasonable notice at any time during the normal business hours, but in no case less than 24 hours' notice, to such of its books, records, accounts, and all other sources of information and its facilities as said Department or Agency shall require to ascertain compliance with this clause. Contractor and its subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement. (See Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §11105.) Contractor shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under the Agreement.

11. CERTIFICATION CLAUSES: The CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION CLAUSES contained in the document CCC 04/2017 are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement by this reference as if attached hereto.

12. TIMELINESS: Time is of the essence in this Agreement.

13. COMPENSATION: The consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided herein, shall be in compensation for all of Contractor's expenses incurred in the performance hereof, including travel, per diem, and taxes, unless otherwise expressly so provided.

14. GOVERNING LAW: This contract is governed by and shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

15. ANTITRUST CLAIMS: The Contractor by signing this agreement hereby certifies that if these services or goods are obtained by means of a competitive bid, the Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the Government Codes Sections set out below.

A. The Government Code Chapter on Antitrust claims contains the following definitions:
1) "Public purchase" means a purchase by means of competitive bids of goods, services, or materials by the State or any of its political subdivisions or public agencies on whose behalf the Attorney General may bring an action pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 16750 of the Business and Professions Code.
2) "Public purchasing body" means the State or the subdivision or agency making a public purchase. Government Code Section 4550.

B. In submitting a bid to a public purchasing body, the bidder offers and agrees that if the bid is accepted, it will assign to the purchasing body all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, materials, or services by the bidder for sale to the purchasing body pursuant to the bid. Such assignment shall be made and become effective Rev 04/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 3 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT C: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS (04/2017)
at the time the purchasing body tenders final payment to the bidder. Government Code Section 4552.

C. If an awarding body or public purchasing body receives, either through judgment or settlement, a monetary recovery for a cause of action assigned under this chapter, the assignor shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for actual legal costs incurred and may, upon demand, recover from the public body any portion of the recovery, including treble damages, attributable to overcharges that were paid by the assignor but were not paid by the public body as part of the bid price, less the expenses incurred in obtaining that portion of the recovery. Government Code Section 4553.

D. Upon demand in writing by the assignor, the assignee shall, within one year from such demand, reassign the cause of action assigned under this part if the assignor has been or may have been injured by the violation of law for which the cause of action arose and (a) the assignee has not been injured thereby, or (b) the assignee declines to file a court action for the cause of action.

See Government Code Section 4554.

16. CHILD SUPPORT COMPLIANCE ACT: For any Agreement in excess of $100,000, the contractor acknowledges in accordance with Public Contract Code 7110, that:

A. The contractor recognizes the importance of child and family support obligations and shall fully comply with all applicable state and federal laws relating to child and family support enforcement, including, but not limited to, disclosure of information and compliance with earnings assignment orders, as provided in Chapter 8 (commencing with section 5200) of Part 5 of Division 9 of the Family Code; and
B. The contractor, to the best of its knowledge is fully complying with the earnings assignment orders of all employees and is providing the names of all new employees to the New Hire Registry maintained by the California Employment Development Department.

17. UNENFORCEABLE PROVISION: In the event that any provision of this Agreement is unenforceable or held to be unenforceable, then the parties agree that all other provisions of this Agreement have force and effect and shall not be affected thereby.

18. PRIORITY HIRING CONSIDERATIONS: If this Contract includes services in excess of $200,000, the Contractor shall give priority consideration in filling vacancies in positions funded by the Contract to qualified recipients of aid under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 11200 in accordance with Pub. Contract Code §10353.

19. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION AND DVBE PARTICIPATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS:

A. If for this Contract Contractor made a commitment to achieve small business participation, then Contractor must within 60 days of receiving final payment under this Contract (or within such other time period as may be specified elsewhere in this Contract) report to the awarding department the actual percentage of small business participation that was achieved. (Govt.

Code § 14841.)
B. If for this Contract Contractor made a commitment to achieve disabled veteran business enterprise (DVBE) participation, then Contractor must within 60 days of receiving final payment under this Contract (or within such other time period as may be specified elsewhere in this Contract) certify in a report to the awarding department: (1) the total amount the prime Contractor received under the Contract; (2) the name and address of the DVBE(s) that participated in the performance of the Contract; (3) the amount each DVBE received from the prime Contractor; (4) that all payments under the Contract have been made to the DVBE; and (5) the actual Rev 04/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 4 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT C: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS (04/2017)
percentage of DVBE participation that was achieved. A person or entity that knowingly provides false information shall be subject to a civil penalty for each violation. (Mil. & Vets. Code § 999.5(d); Govt. Code § 14841.)

20. LOSS LEADER: If this contract involves the furnishing of equipment, materials, or supplies then the following statement is incorporated: It is unlawful for any person engaged in business within this state to sell or use any article or product as a "loss leader" as defined in Section 17030 of the Business and Professions Code. (PCC 10344(e).)
Rev 04/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 1 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT D: SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. GRANTEE'S GENERAL RESPONSIBILITY
A. Grantee agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement. Review and approval by the BSCC are solely for the purpose of proper administration of grant funds and shall not be deemed to relieve or restrict the Grantee's responsibility.

B. Grantee is responsible for the performance of all project activities identified in Attachment 1: CalVIP Request for Proposals Request for Proposals and Attachment 2: CalVIP Grant Proposal.

C. Grantee shall immediately advise the BSCC of any significant problems or changes that arise during the course of the project.

2. GRANTEE ASSURANCES AND COMMITMENTS
A. Compliance with Laws and Regulations
This Grant Agreement is governed by and shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Grantee shall at all times comply with all applicable State laws, ruies and regulations, and all applicable local ordinances.

B. Fulfillment of Assurances and Declarations
Grantee shall fulfill all assurances, declarations, representations, and statements made by the Grantee in Attachment 1: CalVIP Request for Proposals Request for Proposals and Attachment 2: CalVIP Proposal, documents, amendments, approved modifications, and communications filed in support of its request for grant funds.

C. Permits and Licenses
Grantee agrees to procure all permits and licenses necessary to complete the project, pay all charges and fees, and give all notices necessary or incidental to the due and lawful proceeding of the project work.

3. POTENTIAL SUBCONTRACTORS
A. In accordance with the provisions of this Grant Agreement, the Grantee may subcontract for services needed to implement and/or support program activities. Grantee agrees that in the event of any inconsistency between this Grant Agreement and Grantee's agreement with a subcontractor, the language of this Grant Agreement will prevail.

B. Nothing contained in this Grant Agreement or otherwise, shall create any contractual relation responsibilities and obligations hereunder. The Grantee agrees to be as fully responsible to le BSCC for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors and of persons either directly ( directly emploved by any of them as it is for the acts and omissions of persons direct employed by the Grantee. The Grantee's obligation to pay its subcontractors is an independent obligation from the BSCC's obligation to make payments to the Grantee. As a result, the BSCO C. Grantee shall ensure that all subcontractors comply with the eligibility requirements stated in the CalVIP RFP and described in Appendix B.

D. Grantee assures that for any subcontract awarded by the Grantee, such insurance and fidelity bonds, as is customary and appropriate, will be obtained.

E. Grantee agrees to place appropriate language in all subcontracts for work on the project requiring the Grantee's subcontractors to:
1) Books and Records
Rev 04/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 2 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT D: SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Maintain adequate fiscal and project books, records, documents, and other evidence pertinent to the subcontractor's work on the project in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Adequate supporting documentation shall be maintained in such detail so as to permit tracing transactions from the invoices, to the accounting records, to the supporting documentation. These records shall be maintained for a minimum of three (3) years after the acceptance of the final grant project audit under the Grant Agreement and shall be subject to examination and/or audit by the BSCC or designees, state government auditors or designees, or by federal government auditors or designees. 2) Access to Books and Records
Make such books, records, supporting documentations, and other evidence available to the BSCC or designee, the State Controller's Office, the Department of General Services, the Department of Finance, California State Auditor, and their designated representatives during the course of the project and for a minimum of three (3) years after acceptance of the final grant project audit. The Subcontractor shall provide suitable facilities for access, monitoring, inspection, and copying of books and records related to the grant-funded project.

4. PROJECT ACCESS
Grantee shall ensure that the BSCC, or any authorized representative, will have suitable access to project activities, sites, staff and documents at all reasonable times during the grant period including those maintained by subcontractors. Access to program records will be made available by both the grantee and the subcontractors for a period of three (3) years following the end of the grant period.

5. ACCOUNTING AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
A. Grantee agrees that accounting procedures for grant funds received pursuant to this Grant Agreement shall be in accordance with generally accepted government accounting principles and practices, and adequate supporting documentation shall be maintained in such detail as to provide an audit trail. Supporting documentation shall permit the tracing of transactions from such documents to relevant accounting records, financial reports and invoices.

B. Grantees are required to provide the BSCC with a financial audit no later than the end of the contract term, December 31, 2025. The financial audit shall be performed by a Certified Public Accountant or a participating county or city auditor that is organizationally independent from the participating county's or city's project financial management functions. Expenses for this final audit may be reimbursed for actual costs up to $25,000
C. The BSCC reserves the right to call for a program or financial audit at any time between the execution of this Grant Agreement and three years following the end of the grant period. At any time, the BSCC may disallow all or part of the cost of the activity or action determined to not be in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement or take other remedies legally available.

6. DEBARMENT, FRAUD, THEFT OR EMBEZZLEMENT
It is the policy of the BSCC to protect grant funds from unreasonable risks of fraudulent, criminal, or other improper use. As such, the Board will not enter into contracts or provide reimbursement to grantees that have been:

1. debarred by any federal, state, or local government entities during the period of debarment; or

2. convicted of fraud, theft, or embezzlement of federal, state, or local government grant funds for a period of three years following conviction.

Rev D4/2020
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 3 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT D: SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Furthermore, the BSCC requires grant recipients to provide an assurance that there has been no applicable debarment, disqualification, suspension, or removal from a federal, state or local grant program on the part of the grantee at the time of application and that the grantee will immediatel notify the BSCC should such debarment or conviction occur during the term of the Grant contrac assurances to the grant recipient. If a grant recipient wishes to consider a subgrantee or subcontractor that has been debarred or convicted, the grant recipient must submit a written request for exception to the BSCC along with supporting documentation.

All Grantees must have on file with the BSCC a completed and signed Certification of Compliance with BSCC Policies on Debarment, Fraud, Theft and Embezzlement (Required as Attachment E of the original Proposal Package).

7. MODIFICATIONS
No change or modification in the project will be permitted without prior written approval from the BSCC. Changes may include modification to project scope, changes to penormance measures, compliance with collection of data elements, and other significant changes in the budget or program components contained in Attachment 1: CalVIP Request for Proposals Request for Proposals and Attachment 2: CalVIP Proposal.

8. TERMINATION
A. This Grant Agreement may be terminated by the BSCC at any time after grant award and prior to completion of project upon action or inaction by the Grantee that constitutes a material and substantial breech of this Grant Agreement. Such action or inaction includes but is not limited to:
1) substantial alteration of the scope of the grant project without prior written approval of the BSCC:
2) refusal or inability to complete the grant project in a manner consistent with Attachment 1: CalVIP Request for Proposals Request for Proposals and Attachment 2: CalVIP Proposal, or approved modifications;
3) failure to provide the required local match share of the total project costs; and 4) failure to meet prescribed assurances, commitments, recording, accounting, auditing, and reporting requirements of the Grant Agreement.

B. Prior to terminating the Grant Agreement under this provision, the BSCC shall provide the Grantee at least 30 calendar days written notice stating the reasons for termination and effective date thereof. The Grantee may appeal the termination decision in accordance with the instructions listed in Exhibit D: Special Terms and Conditions, Number 8. Settlement of Disputes.

9. SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES
A. The parties shall deal in good faith and attempt to resolve potential disputes informally. If the dispute persists, the Grantee shall submit to the BSCC Corrections Planning and Grant Programs Division Deputy Director a written demand for a final decision regarding the Rev 04/2020
City of San Bemardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 4 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT D: SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
after receipt of Grantee's written demand invoking this Section "Disputes" to render a written decision. If a written decision is not rendered within 30 days after receipt of the Grantee's (or the expiration of the 30-day period in the event no decision is rendered), to the BSCC Executive Director, who shall have 45 days to render a final decision. If the Grantee does not appeal the decision of the BSCC Corrections Planning and Grant Programs Division Deputy Director, the decision shall be conclusive and binding regarding the dispute and the Contractor shall be barred from commencing an action in court, or with the Victims Compensation Government Claims Board, for failure to exhaust Grantee's administrative remedies.

B. Pending the final resolution of any dispute arising under, related to or involving this Grant Agreement, Grantee agrees to diligently proceed with the performance of this Grant Agreement, including the providing of services in accordance with the Grant Agreement. Grantee's failure to diligently proceed in accordance with the State's instructions regarding this Grant Agreement shall be considered a material breach of this Grant Agreement.

C. Any final decision of the State shall be expressly identified as such, shall be in writing, and shall decision shall be conclusive and binding regarding the dispute unless the Grantee commences an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to contest such decision within 90 days following the date of the final decision or one (1) year following the accrual of the cause of action, whichever is later.

D. The dates of decision and appeal in this section may be modified by mutual consent, as applicable, excepting the time to commence an action in a court of competent jurisdiction.

9. UNION ACTIVITIES
For all agreements, except fixed price contracts of $50,000 or less, the Grantee acknowledges that applicability of Government Code §§16654 through 16649 to this Grant Agreement and agrees to the following:

A. No State funds received under the Grant Agreement will be used to assist, promote or deter union organizing.

B. Grantee will not, for any business conducted under the Grant Agreement, use any State property to hold meetings with employees or supervisors, if the purpose of such meetings is to assist, promote or deter union organizing, unless the State property is equally available to the C. If Grantee incurs costs or makes expenditures to assist, promote or deter union organizing, Grantee will maintain records sufficient to show that no reimbursement from State funds ha been sought for these costs, and that Grantee shall provide those records to the Attorne General upon request.

10. WAIVER
The parties hereto may waive any of their rights under this Grant Agreement unless such waiver is contrary to law, provided that any such waiver shall be in writing and signed by the party making such waiver.

Rev 04/2020
California Violence Intervention and Prevention
(CalVIP) Grant Proposal
CalVIP Proposal Cover Sheet
Submitted by:

City of San Bernardino
Grant Dollars Requested:
$3,800,000.00
Date Submitted:

February 8, 2022
CalVIP Applicant Information Form
A. APPLICANT: B. TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:

NAME OF APPLICANT TAX IDENTIFICATION#
City of San Bernardino 95-6000772

STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE
290 N. D Strost San Bemardino CA 82836
MAILING ADDRESS (If different) CITY STATE ZIP CODE
APPLICANT TYPE: • COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATION (CBO) E CITY C. CBO APPLICANTS ONLY -
LOCATION OF RESIDENTS RECEIVING SERVICES (MUST BE CITY OR CITIES LISTED IN TABLE 1):

D.CBO APPLICANTS ONEY - LIST ANY APPLICATIONS WHERE YOU ARE NAMED AS A SUB-RECIPIENT E. PROJECT TITLE: Clty of San Bernardino: Vlolence Interventlon & Prevention Program F. STRATEGY TO BE IMPLEMENTED: Community Violence Intervention-Street Outreach Enhancement G.PROJECT SUMMARY (100-150 words):

This project builds upon the City's CalVIP-1 effort and enhances the City's CalVIP-3 evidence-based street outreach strategy component. Through CalVIP-4 the City of San Bernardino will be in a position to continue its multi-prong approach to violence reduction and fulfill an equity recommendation in the Giffords Gun Law Center' s report on Community Violence Intervention workers. San Bemardino's Violence Intervention Program is designed to break the cycle of community violence citywide, Improve outcomes for young people in-risk of violence. We aim to achieve our goals and objectives through a focused deterrence, evidence-based community violence intervention street outreach strategy; coordination of trauma Informed, culturally relevant intervention and prevention services; Individual and family case management services, crime suppression rooted in principles of procedural justice, and long-term transitional service plans for program participant.

Name: H.O.P.E Culture Letter of Commitment:

Name: San Bernardino Police Department Letter of Commitment:

Name: Letter of Commitment:

G. KEY PARTNER AGENCIES
(If applicable): Name: Letter of Commitment:

Name: Lefter of Commitment: •
Name: Letter of Commitment O
H. TYPE OF PROJECT: • NEW 2 ENHANCEMENT • EXPANSION
I. GRANT FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 3,800,000.00 J. MATCH FUNDS: $ 3,800,000.00 K. CITY APPLICANTS ONLY - PASS-THROUGH AMOUNT: $ 3,500,000.00 95% L. PROJECT DIRECTOR:

NAME TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER (direct line)
David Miranda Community Intervention Manager 908-486-9508

STREET ADDRESS CITY
290 N. D Street San Bemardino

STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL ADDRESS R
California 92401 [email protected]
M. FINANCIAL OFFICER:

NAME TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER (direct line)
Annie Clark Finance Associate 909-384-7269
CalVIP Applicant Information Form | Page 1 of 2

STREET ADDRESS CITY
201 N. E Street San Bemardino

STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL ADDRESS
Callfornia 92401 glark an@sheitkerg
PAYMENT MAILING ADDRESS (ff different) CITY STATE ZIP CODE N. DAY-TO-DAY PROGRAM CONTACT:

NAME TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER (direct line)
David Miranda Community Intervention Manager 909-384-5122

STREET ADDRESS CITY
290N. D Street San Bemardino

STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL ADDRESS
California 82401 [email protected]
O. DAY-TO-DAY FISCAL CONTACT:

NAME TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER (direct line)
Annie Clark Finance Assoclate 909-384-5122

STREET ADDRESS CITY
201 N. E Street San Bernardino

STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL ADDRESS
California 92401 [email protected]
P. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE*:

By signing this application, I hereby certify 1 am vested by the Applicant with the authority to enter into contract with the BSCC, and the grantee and any subcontractors will abide by the laws, policies, and procedures governing this funding.

NAME OF AUTHORIZED OFFICER TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER
Robert D. Fleld City Manager 909-384-5122

STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE
290 N. D Street San Bernadino CA 92401

EMAIL ADDRESS
[email protected]
SIGNATURE E-stomature only:) DATE
8/ /2022
* Authorized Signature: Must be a representative with the authority to sign documents and obligate the applicant.

CalVIP Applicant information Form | Page 2 of 2
Description of Community Need
There is an estimated 1.4 million active street, outlaw motorcycle, and prison gang members; and 33,000 gangs in the United States. The City of San Bemardino is 62 square miles with a population size of 222,101 and it is home to over 45 home-grown and transplant documented gangs comprised of 800 - 1000 gang-group members. Many of the San Bernardino City gangs have been in existence for more than 60 years. Unique to San Bemardino is a strong presence of Los Angeles-based gangs that migrated to the City of San Bernardino back in the mid to late 1980screating a unique community dynamic and group violence problem in the City. Traditionally, groups Identify or clalm a geographic area of a City; however, this is not the case in the City of San Bernardino.

There was a time gangs remained tied to a geographical area, however, due to gang Injunctions, housing affordability, and financial factors, gangs are more fluid in terms of location throughout the City. Gang and gun violence impacts 80% of the City-the most northem and southern ends of the City experience property crime more so than violent crime. As a result, the heart of the city is the most impacted by the cycle of gun violence stemming from retaliatory gang-drug related violence.

San Bernardino has longstanding problems with poverty and serious violence.

For over four decades, the City's homicide rate has averaged almost 45 homicides per year, 2-4 times that of state and national rates. Moreover, San Bernardino City is among the poorest cities in the country. Of the 100 biggest cities in the United States, San Bernardino was ranked the second poorest in the nation in the 2000 census, just behind Detroit, and, in 2012, San Bernardino filed bankruptcy. Since 2012, San Bernardino has had the lowest median income of any City in the state of over 50,000. Central to the issue of community need and service gaps is the fact that despite the seriousness of the problem of violence in San Bemardino, there is no well-established County, City or Community-based Organization-administered gang Intervention "outreach and support" strategy in the City of San Bemardino. This acts as a significant barrier in serving young people at risk of involvement in gang-gun violence and making the City a safe place to live and work.
1 Poverty Is pronounced and affects people of color disproportlonately. • In the ten years leading up to 2013, the median family income, adjusted for inflation, dropped from $50,000 to $37,440, the lowest in the state for a city of Its size. In 2020, the median household income is $45,000 and in other parts 30% of resldents live In poverty.
• The percentage of homeless children is double that of Califomia, which leads all states in homeless children. The City of San Bernardino has the highest number of sheltered and unsheltered homeless persons in the County for a total of 1,056 a 38% increase from 2019.

Key public systems - such as education and criminal justice - present struggles for people of all races but especially so for people of color. • Blacks and Latinos in San Bemardino County are significantly less likely to have access to good schools when compared with county's Asian and Caucasian residents.
• English Language Art Scores 54% of students met or exceeded Standard for ELA:

20.89% did not meet ELA standard; 24.40% nearly met ELA standard; 32.85% met standard; 21.85% exceeded standard.
• Mathematics 24.12% met or exceeded standard for math: 48.73% did not meet standard; 27.14% nearly met standard; 16.98% met standard; 7.14% exceeded standard.
• The San Bemardino County Black suspension rate (14 suspensions per 100 students) was nearly twice the next closest rate (Native American 7.9) and more than 11 times higher than the lowest rate (Asian 1.2) in 2014-15. Although total number of Latino suspensions is nearly twice (2, 158 Latino suspensions and 1,106 Black suspensions) as much as Black suspensions, the percentage of the Latino population suspended is at 5% compared to 13.3% for Black suspensions.

Violence has the greatest impact on young people of color, particularly young Black, and Latino males.

Our primary data source for the following statements is a Problem and Opportunity Analysis-a systematic and in-depth analysis of the City's violent gun crime-designed to support the Implementation of a data-driven partnership-based street outreach violence reduction strategy. This analysis completed by the California Partnership for Safe 2 Communities (CPS) identifies the individuals within a community who are at greatest risk of gun violence. The methodology, informed by research, consisted of the systematic review of 111 of the homicides that took place in the City San Bernardino from January 2015 - June 2017. These incidents directly involved 189 individuals, including victims and known suspects. The review closely examined each incident, including motives and circumstances; the demographics of the individuals directly involved in these incidents and their criminal justice system involvement; the role of networks and relationships in increasing the risk of involvement in violence; and a variety of methods for understanding the geographic and social distribution of risk.

Violence in San Bernardino disproportionately impacts young people of color. • 73% of victims and known suspects are between the ages of 18 and 34. The average age is 31.
• While juveniles only accounted for 7% of the crime during the study period, FBI Uniform Crime Report 2017, Table 28, states that Juveniles account for over 60,000 violent crimes annually.
• Blacks make up over 50% of victims and suspects, even though they make up only 15% of all residents. Latinos make up 38% of victims and suspects but make up 60% of all residents (in this age group).

Networks and relationships appear to play a significant role in serious violence.

The majority of homicides in San Bernardino involve individuals' active in networks such as gangs and less formal groups such as sets and crews as victims, suspects, or both (66-81%).
• About 55% these incidents are associated with ongoing personal and gang conflicts, about 20% are attributed to unknown motives, about 10% to domestic violence and about 10% to robberies and drug-related crimes. • These groups tend to be primarily African American or primarily Latino, though some are racially mixed with Latinos and Blacks.
• The total number of active groups is 21 out of 45 gangs, groups, sets, and cliques identified. Of those 21 groups, 7 groups were associated with the greatest amount of homicides (80) from January 2015-June 2019.
3 • While the social distribution is concentrated in the heart of the City, the geographic distribution of actively violent groups is fairly widely distributed across the City.

Project Description
San Bemardino City seeks funding support to enhance a multi-pronged strategy consisting of an intensive focus on violence intervention and partnership-based community vlolence reduction strategy a law enforcement focused deterrence approach to gun crime and community-based street outreach violence intervention and prevention strategy. This enhancement actively incorporates time-tested and evidence- based elements of community-based street outreach and support work in place in the City of Los Angeles Mayor's Office of Gang Reduction & Youth Development. This proposal focuses on two major parts of the initiatives above and makes continued investment in community violence intervention to reduce gang violence in the near-term- enhanced street outreach and supportive services. First, in support of AB 1603, the outreach and support services effort will focus on people impacted by gun violence and those at the highest risk of gang violence. The second includes an ongoing capacity building for street outreach supportive services.

How the program works: four operational components
The first of these is to have our teams continuously monitor and analyze local violence through City Police department data to identify and intervene with people at imminent risk of joining a gang, active members becoming a victim of gun violence, and or a gang members seeking retaliation. This consists of a problem analysis and a tight cycle of real- time analysis and service coordination that takes place in a partnership meeting between law enforcement partners, community-based organizations, and service providers. This fast-moving process employs real-time analysis and collaborative planning to strategically mobilize a wide range of partners that includes outreach workers, community coordinators/case managers, community leaders, community-based organizations (CBOs) and criminal justice partners around a double bottom line focused on reducing gun violence on a community-wide level while also reducing recidivism and victimization - and doing so in a way that strengthens trust between police and the community. This cycle begins with a team of managers and front-line staff undertaking an incident review.

The Incident review meeting begins with a review of every shooting that resulted in injury 4 in the previous week, fight that broke out in school or in the community to determine if incident is gang related, involved or motivated. The team moves through a series of analytical questions about the shootings with the goal of identifying the individuals currently most at risk of being involved in violence as victim or perpetrator to assess and determine risk for retaliation; and, continues with the partners drawing on this analysis to develop a collaborative plan of action. Plans are designed to "interrupt" gang violence quickly while also reducing the City's reliance on police strategies and tactics, such as stop-and-frisks and buy-and-busts, that tend to focus on those at low risk of violence, sweeping them into the criminal justice system with minlmal public safety benefit. Instead, these plans link analysis to frontline staff's deep experience to focus on the small number of individuals involved in violence. The goal is to put the output of the incident review - a more accurate assessment of risk and the emerging response - into action as soon as is practically possible consistent with the program values.

The second step consists of an alliance of community leaders engaging young people at highest risk of violence through direct, respectful communication. This communication will take place via, "sit-downs" structured community proactive peace keeping recreational activities, resource fairs, and individual custom notifications. In the first, often referred to as a community sit-down aka "call-in" • young people that have experienced violence directly, clergy, street outreach and criminal justice leaders gather with 10-15 high-risk young people, typically in a church or community center (a safe and familiar place). The partners share their commitment to making neighborhoods safe and keeping the young men alive and free, while providing them with clear information about the risks of violence and incarceration and, emphatically, their commitment to stand with them as they step away from violence and move toward pathways to opportunity. These meetings are followed by a series of welcoming focus groups designed to engage and give voice to the youth attending the sit-down, often over meals or recreational activities.

The partners may also use what's known as a custom notification & joint custom notification-joint custom includes law enforcement partner, whereas a custom notification does not. In these instances, the sit-down message is compressed into a direct conversation between one or two partners and the young person at risk and takes place wherever most convenient (e.g., at home, school, or a street comer etc.). Partners 5 plan communications carefully to ensure participants and their families feel respected, cared for, and are able to share their perspective. Numerous studies show these face-to- face communications - informed by procedural justice - can reduce the chances of further Involvement in violence and the justice system. This communication also introduces these clients to relationship-based "community coordinators" aka outreach worker/case managers. The partners constantly monitor their ability to engage the very highest risk of young people in a meaningful and effective supportive relationship.

The third part consists of working quickly to address safety issues while building a long-term trusting relationship. Engaging young people at highest risk of violence requires proactive outreach, constant in-person contact and "quick wins" (e.g., obtaining a govemment ID, addressing school performance & attendance, linking up with a mentor, or connecting with family to address problem behavior). Incentives, such as gift cards, field trips, stipends and food, help keep them engaged. Skilled outreach workers or community coordinators focus on building a trust relationship and addressing a clients immediate safety risks while developing a long-term plan for stability and Increased prosociai life opportunities.

The fourth moving part transitions from this urgent focus on safety to a continuing relationship that Includes formal services and a supportive community focused on the long-term work of personal change. After addressing immediate safety issues and stabilizing individual, community coordinators provide help clients access treatment services such as trauma information therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, higher education, and employment. Arranging for priority access to services helps clients maintain a sense of momentum and optimism. Stepping away from gang violence can mean leaving behind close friends and family, as a result informal support is critical to supporting youth impacted by gang culture. Short-term risk reduction stabilizes clients In crisis, followed by long-term counseling, mentoring and support groups. This community of support provides a new peer group and models healthy lifestyles and decision-making.

Clients will remain connected to their outreach worker or community coordinator/case manager for at least 1-2 years. They support clients to accomplish "life plans" - centered on academics, higher education, employment training with a career focus, parenthood and housing - while ensuring safety and stability.

The design of this effort is rooted in evidence of effectiveness (1) The evidence in support of the approach is well established. Leading criminologists recently conducted a systematic review - considered the "gold standard" of research - of the many evaluations of this approach and found the strategy was effective across a number of different cities (10 of 11 citles achieved double-digit reductions in violence), leading the authors to conclude it was among the most effective modern violence- reduction approaches. One of the evaluations cited by the authors is of similar work in Stockton, a City that has faced economic and crime challenges resembling those of San Bernardino. (2) A growing body of evidence suggests that what makes the approach effective Is its utilization of the principles of procedural justice/police legitimacy. In particular, these authors focus on the communication component of the approach and note its effectiveness relative to, for example, street enforcement and sentence length. (3) The evidence specific to Los Angeles' Gang Reduction and Youth Development (GYRD) initiative's joint-gang violence intervention outreach worker & LAPD-crisis response. This recent evaluation conducted by Cal State LA, USC, UCLA, and Harder + Company of the GRYD Crisis Response model showed a 43.2% reduction in retaliatory shootings, that it prevented an estimated 185 gang retaliations Citywide, and resulted in direct and indirect savings of $110.2 million over 2 years. (4) The Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence: On the Front Lines. An October 2021 report pertaining to the inequities in the Community Violence Intervention profession. The report identifies several issues associated with the Community Violence Intervention field and makes several recommendations, number one being baseline pay for Community Violence Intervention workers to start at $45,000 annually.

The operational components and capacity building partnerships with the City of San Bernardino is currently underway. The City will employ an approach that has been developed steadily and with significant success in Los Angeles. Recognizing that community-based organizations have been historically under resourced, San Bernardino City intends to make an ongoing investment in building the capacity of these CBOs for quality implementation. Among other things, this capacity building effort will draw on the best practices established by the City of Los Angeles GRYD Program and UP! training in outreach worker professional standards and conduct, while the technical assistance provided by CPSC will continue to develop and refine the City's law enforcement focused deterrence strategy. Through three complementary mechanisms to ensure the initiative, generally, and the operational components, specifically, are culturally competent and incorporate trauma-informed practice:
• The City will work closely with existing community-based organizations to integrate this support and capacity building.
• Comprehensive violence reduction training and linked capacity building to be undertaken.
• Through the steady and careful development of an advisory group that will be made up of individuals at highest risk of violence, their families and loved ones, and residents of communities experiencing disproportionately high levels of violence.

The primary vehicles for engaging, supporting, and collaborating with these stakeholders will be:
• Focus groups, listening sessions, surveys, and related activities designed for young people at very highest risk of violence (primarily through the outreach and support activities outlined above).
• Mutual support groups and related engaging activities/convening for familles of individuals at very highest risk of violence through the City, CBO's and the faith community.

Organizational Capacity & Coordination
Utilizing technical assistance tools provided by the California Partnership for Safe Communities and The Connie Rice Institute for Urban Peace, the City will continue to build up local capacity to reduce violent crime, specifically homicides and aggravated assaults with a firearm. The Program Manager reports to the City Manager and will responsible for the implementation of the City's Violence Intervention Program. The City's Program Manager currently oversees the City's Violence Intervention Program supportive service contracts and if awarded the City will amend existing contract with HOPE Culture:

Victory Outreach of San Bernardino-a local community-based agency with an experience of 60 years of providing essential services for individuals impacted by gang, drug, and gun violence, staff have gone through personal transformation, are from the 8 community they serve and have similar life experiences as program population. Each agency has staff responsible for program management and coordination in addition to data-program analysts who will track data and ensure goals, objectives are being met.

HOPE Culture has a proven track record of providing culturally competent, age appropriate, and life changing resources in the city. They have the cultural expertise and relevant experience needed to carry out community engagement and violence intervention efforts to reduce group-related gun violence through a range of ongoing proactive community engagement peacemaking efforts. In addition, both agencies have a proven track record of providing evidence-based trauma Informed services in the city and currently provide intensive case management services to those identified at weekly service coordination meetings, community events, and sit-downs. Agency staff has relevant experience in serving highest risk individuals-community members actively engaged in gun violence-with their immediate needs and are culturally competent to assist program participants through their path to transformation including: a) assisting clients with conflict resolution and mediation, relocation, and evidence-based prosocial mentoring; b) assisting clients design life and safety plans to enable high-risk individuals to set personal safety priorities; c) developing and convening regular mutual-support meetings. The City's current Program Director has over 13 years of program development, coordination, data management, and implementing gang prevention and intervention initiatives. In addition the Program Manager will continue to serve as the point of contact for the BSCC, contracted CBOs, law enforcement partners in the City of San Bemardino and adjacent jurisdictions-—and, provide program & fiscal oversight with the City finance department.

Project Evaluation and Managing a citywide collaborative to success.

Program evaluation, oversight, data collection, and monitoring will begin upon recelving award notification. VIP will develop performance management reviews as a vehicle for partners and stakeholders to hold themselves accountable for quality implementation and results and acquire sustainable funding to expand and enhance their efforts. At performance reviews, community leaders, and the VIP project leads will come together to hold themselves accountable for quality implementation and fidelity to the values guiding their work, including the principles of procedural justice. Performance reviews most typically take place quarterly and have a three-part agenda:

First, partners will assess progress toward the violence-reduction goals they established at the outset of their joint efforts: For example, reductions of at least 5 percent per year in homicides and nonfatal injury shootings, fully realizing that no amount of violence is acceptable but that the impact of violence on young men of color requires concrete commitments and hard choices generated by a public commitment to measurable results.

Second, they will evaluate the quality of implementation based on Indicators drawn from the main operational components of VIP, including communication, outreach and support, enforcement, and coordination. For each component, indicators are linked to focus ("Are we sustaining our focus on the small proportion of individuals driving violence?"), scale ("Are we working at a scale that promises citywide results?"), and fidelity to the model ("Are we carrying out this activity in a way that is consistent with evaluation findings on effectiveness?"). The data on outcome and activity indicators (objectives) is assembled into a single worksheet that can be reviewed in less than two hours, quickly conveying the information to concered community leaders, frontline staff, and busy department heads. Third element of the meetings will be a running conversation, woven into the review, about the measures needed to strengthen implementation, including reallocating funding, modifying program modifications, and resetting priorities. The meetings will end with a summary of these commitments that are quickly incorporated into agency and staff work plans. Local evaluator will be included in the meetings mentioned above and will be responsible for collecting all key process information using standardized forms that will be developed at the initiation of the program year. Utilizing program database, the Information will be compiled into monthly reports that will be reviewed by the City Manager's Office and CalVIP contracted agencies on an ongoing basis to improve program implementation and the extent that the program is achieving the goals and objectives. Goals & objectives (outcome indicators): Citywide goal: Reduce shootings as measured by: (1) Homicides by a minimum of 5% each year. Individual goal:

Reduce gunshot victimizations and recidivism for violent crimes by 15% from baselines for program participants over the course of the grant period. Activity Indicators (process measures). These activity indicators may be modified based on practice and experience 10 but will remain focused on core operational components, on key aspects of quality implementation (e.g., focus and scale) and accepted best practice research. One, Communication Engagements: Carry out communications with at least 50 very highest risk individuals a year identified via coordination meetings, custom notifications via street outreach, structured community events in highly active communities, and sit-downs. Two, Outreach & Support: (a) engage at least 50% of individuals in outreach and support relationships; (b) Carry out at least 4 meaningful face-to-face with these individuals every week; (c) Consistent use of "safety planning" in overall case management. Three, Analysis-Management- Coordination: conduct weekly shooting reviews & coordination meetings with consistent attendance by project leads. Four Quality Implementation:

Maintain consistent convening of and attendance by senior partners in semi-monthly "planning and performance reviews." Complementing this performance management and program oversight/monitoring framework, is the partnership between the City, CPSC, and UPI to build the capacity of community-led organizations to provide outreach and support.

Support for Community Violence Intervention Work
Whereas the City of San Bernardino continues its multi-prong community violence Intervention (CVI) strategy and has experienced a year-to-date reduction in group related violence-47 group-related homicides in 2020 vs 28 group-related homicides in 2021- there remains a lack of funding to support a living wage for the CVI worker. Salaries among outreach workers are 30%-40% lower when compared to median household income ($45K) in the City of San Bernardino. Similarly, as mentioned in the Giffords Gun Law Center report—a survey of CVI workers, executive directors, law enforcement, and government officials in Chicago, Los Angeles, Baltimore, and Oakland-related to the Community Violence Intervention Field, On the Front Lines, Elevating the Voices of Violence Intervention Workers-CVI workers do not feel supported nor valued by government officials; the field is missing a non-profit business incubator to support small organizations; intervention organizations must institutionallze systems of care for their CVI workers, and baseline pay should include benefits. Insightful survey findings include:
• Three-quarters (75%) of full-time CVI workers reported making between $30,000 and $50,000 per year. Of those within this income bracket, at least 60% reported an annual salary of less than $42,000.
11 • Fourteen percent of workers reported earning between $50,000 and $70,000 per year. Roughly the same number of workers earned less than $30,000 and more than $70,000 per year.
• Nearly 64% of workers reported that they worked one additional paid job to make ends meet, and another 12% of workers said they worked two or more additional paid jobs.
• Alarmingly, many workers who work additional paid jobs also volunteer to work additional hours in their role as a CVI worker. Eighty-seven percent of full-time workers reported that they work additional hours beyond their regular work schedule at least once a month.

While the report identifies several issues of concern and offers sound recommendations to mitigate the issues identified in the field of community violence intervention. This proposal aims at fulfilling the first and primary of the six recommendations outlined in the front-line report. Specifically, the October 2021 Giffords report identifies issues associated with the Community Violence Intervention Field as it relates to wages and provides recommendation number 1: Baseline pay for Community Violence Intervention workers should start at $45,000 annually (with adjustments based on cost of living and overtime compensation), in addition to medical, dental, life insurance, and retirement benefits. The report further states that street outreach work is a calling: those drawn to it report high levels of job fulfillment despite relatively low wages. However, a higher average pay for the field is sorely needed, both to reflect the inherent value of the work and the risks involved, as well as to help address commonly reported issues of retention, recruitment, and negative health impacts on intervention workers. 12 Annotated Bibllography

1. Braga, A. & Weisburd, D. (2012). The effects of "pulling levers" focused deterrence strategies on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6. This is a meta-analysis of the leading (that is, methodologically rigorous) evaluations of the overall approach to be implemented. It found that the approach was effective in over 90% of the city efforts evaluated. Findings below:

Boston Operation Ceasefire 63% youth homicide
Indianapolis IVRP -34% total homicide
Stockton -42% gun homicide
Lowell PSN 44% gun assault
Cincinnati CIRV 42% GMI homicide, -22% shooting:

Newark Ceasefire No sig. reduction in gunshot wounds
LA Operation Ceasefire Sig. short-term reduction in gun vio.

Chicago PSN -37% Homicide, -30% recidivism rate
Boston Re-entry -30% vlo. recidivism rate
Nashville DMI -55% reduction in drug offenses

2. The following two studies/evaluations tracked the influence of procedurally just communication on recidivism and found positive results as per Chicago above. a. Papachristos, A.V., Meares, T., and Fagan, J. (2009). The influence of legitimacy & social networks on active gun offenders. Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 373.
b. Meares, T. (2015). Rightful Policing. New Perspectives in Policing Bulletin.

Washington, D.C.: U.S. DOJ, National Institute of Justice. (3).

3. The evidence specific to GRYD. The "GRYD Intervention Incident Response and Gang Crime 2017 Evaluation Report." Brangtingham, Sundback, Yan and Chan. Evaluation that documented the following: a -43.2% reduction in retaliatory shootings, that it prevented an estimated 185 gang retaliations citywide, and resulted in direct and indirect savings of $110.2 million over two years city-wide.

4. The Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence: On the Front Lines. A October 2021 report related to the Community Violence Intervention The report identifies several issues associated with the Community Vlolence Intervention Field. The report also makes several Recommendation Number 1: Baseline pay for
commend olence intervention worker should start sa
Appendix K: Cal VIP Project Work Plan
(1) Goal: Reduce Overall Homicides by 5% per year
Objectives a) Engage 50 ofindividuals per year identified in shooting reviewe, street outreach, and coordination meetings as very highest risk in ongoing outreach and support relationships.

Project activities that support the identified Responsible staff/ Timeline goal and objectives partners Start Date End Date

1. Ongoing training and capacity building
plans are developed and implemented 1. Program Manager, by VIP core partners. СВО partners

2. Develop and convene weekly shooting 1-5 July 2022 June 30, incident reviews to ID very highest risk 2. Program Manager & 2025 individuals and develop Intervention SBPD
plans.

3. Convene weekly coordination meetings 3-5 Oversight by with partner, SBPD, CBO's and clergy Program Manager in leaders to plan and implement partnershlp with SBPD
measures for addressing active conflicts project leads and CO's and building individual level (rolling implementation)
Interventions.

4. Conduct Street Outreach In coordination
with Program Manager & Law
Enforcement In communitles Impacted
by gun related violence.

5. Conduct semi-monthly performance
management reviews to ensure quality
Implementation.
(2) Goal: Reduce victimization and recidivism for program participants by approx. 15% over course of grant.

Objectives b) Engage minimum 50 Individuals a year in ongoing outreach and support relationships.

Project activities that support the identified Responsible staff/ Timeline goal and objectives partners Start Date End Date

1. Conduct 50 custom notifications per 1. Program Manager, 1. 7.1.2022 1-4. Through year with the highest risk individuals CBOs State Technical duration of identified via incident revlews & Assistance provider as grant- coordination meetings, hotspot needed. 2.- 4. June 30,
outreach; implement 4 structured 11.1.2022 2025
proactive peacekeeping events per 2. - 4. CBO'sin
year. partnership with State

2. Carry out 3 in-person high quality Technical Assistance contacts with VIP participants on a provider as needed. weekly basis.

3. As part of life plans, develop safety
plans for 50% of all high-risk clients.

4. Participating CBO's will convene weekly
case management meetings in
partnership with technical assistance
provider.

City of
San Bernardino
Police Department | David Green, Interim Chief of Police To: Board of State and Community Corrections
Re: California Violence Intervention & Prevention (CalVIP) Grant - 4 Date: February 2, 2022
This letter is being submitted to document that the San Bemardino Police Department agrees to continue to partner on the CalViP-4 grant proposal being submitted by the City Manager of the City of San Bemardino, Violence intervention Program (VIP).

As a part of this proposed effort, the San Bernardino Police Department agrees to continue conducting weekly shoat reviews to identify and provide referrals to the City Manager's Community Intervention Program. Specifically, as part of the grant proposal, the Department will commit to conduct the following core activities:

1. Weekly shoot reviews, a three-part weekly meeting designed to analyze and manage violence taking place within the City including: a) analysis of serious violent incidents and trends to better understand the circumstances driving violence b) problem solving discussion and planning to employ intelligence, communication, and enforcement to address violent activity, c) use of reports and performance metrics to ensure timely follow-through on the incident reviews and strategy discussion.

2. Through referrals to the Community Intervention Program connect individuals identified via shoot reviews to interventionist specialist, case managers and other service providers that use evidence-based service strategies that lead to safety and self-sufficiency.

We are current partners in the City of San Bernardino's violence reduction efforts, and we are committed to the work and excited for the opportunity to enhance the City's efforts.

Sincerely,
David Green Nelson Carington Jason King
Interim Chief of Police Captain Lieutenant
710 North D St/P. O. Box 1559, San Bernardino, CA 92401 | P: 909-384-5742 | F: 909-383-4950 | www.SBCity.org

EMPOWERM

I CULTURE
February 1, 2022
Board of State and Community Correction
Executive Steering Committee
Re: California Violence Intervention & Prevention (CalVIP) Grant 4 This letter is being submitted to document that HLO.P.E Culture agrees to partner on the CalVIP grant proposal being submitted by the Office of the City Manager, Office of Violence Prevention, Community Intervention Program.

As a part of the CalVIP 2020 proposal, HOPE Culture agrees to identify, engage, and provide supportive services to individuals at the highest risk of violence. Specifically, HOPE Culture Victory Outreach is committed to performing the following but not limited to:
• Provide program management and coordination.
• Develop and carry out community engagement plans and strategies designed to build individual and group relationships with those at highest risk of involvement in violence. • Proactively to reduce group related tensions and conflicts that could escalate to violence or lead to retaliation; and, work with victims and potential perpetrators of violence. • Maintain a caseload of between 10 individuals per outreach case manager. • Assist clients design life and safity plans to enable high-risk individuals to set personal safety priorities and short-term life goals.
• Develop and convene regular mutual-support meetings for program participants. • Collect all relevant program data related to program participants, violence intervention, and community engagement activities.

As current partners in the City of San Bernardino's violence reduction efforts and we are committed to the work and excited for the opportunity to enhance our efforts.

Sincerely,
Rick Alanis Jr.

Executive Director

BSCC CPGP
2022 California Violence Intervention & Prevention (CalVIP) Grant - Project Budget and Budget Narrative Name of Applicant: City of San Bemardino
Contract Term: July 1, 2022 - December 31, 2025
Note: The top sabie will auto-populate based on the information entered in the sections befow.

Budget Line item Grant Funds Match Funds Total

1. Salaries and Benefits $400,000 $400,000
2 Services and Supplies 50 $0 $o

3. Health and Wellness (must not exceed 6% of total match funds) 50 $0

4. Professional Services or Public Agency Subcontracts $o so $0

5. Non-Govermental Organization (NGO) Subcontracts $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $6,800,000 B. Equipment/Fixed Assets so $0 $0

7. Project Evaluation (must be at least 5%, but no more than 10% of total grant funds) $160,000 $0 $160,000 B. Financial Audit (must not exosed $25,000) $25,000 $0 $25,000 B. Other (Travel, Training, etc.) $50,000 $0 $50,000

10. Indirect Costs $166,000 $0 $185,000
TOTAL $3,800,000 $3,800,000 $7,600,000
Required match: 100% no less than $3,860,000
1a. Salaries and Benefits
Name and Title (Show as either % FTE gr Hourty Rate) & Benefits Grant Funds Match Funds Total David Miranda, Community Intervention Pro. Manager 100% 50 $400,000 $400,000 TOTAL $0 $400,000 $400,000
1b. Salaries and Benefits Narrative:

The City & Community Interventon Program Manager mil serve as the port of contact for the BSC, COs, lew enforcement partners in tho City of San Bernardino and todyscent jurisdictions providing progrem & fiscal oversight. Program manager wil convene community-based organizelions end subgrantee(s) on a weekly basis to ensure new staff are hired and treined. in addlian, Program Manager will oversee the day to day operations af program implementation and connect program steff to local schools, hospltals, and other service providers.
2a. Services and Supplies
Descaption of Services or Supplies Calculation for Expenditure Grant Funds Match Funds Total $0 $0 $D
TOTAL $0 $0 50
2b. Services and Supplies Narrative:

Enter narralve here. You may expand ces neight i needed. 3a. Health and Wellness (must not exceed 5% of total match funds) Description of Professional Service(s) Calculation for Expenditure Grant Funds Match Funds Total TOTAL (must not exceed 5% of Total Match Funds) $0
3b. Health and Wellness Narrative
4a. Professional Services
Description of Professional Service(s) Calculation for Expenditure Grant Funds Match Funds Total $0 $0 50
TOTAL $0 $0
4b. Professional Services Narrative
Enter narrative here. You may expand cal neight a needea. 5a. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) Subcontracts
Description of Subcontract Calculation for Expenditure Grant Funds Match Funds Total -...

H.O.P.E. Culture 1 NGO VIP Contract for 3 years $2,400,000 $400,000 $2,800,000 NGO VIP Contracte 3 NGOs @ $1 Million per NGO x 3 years $0 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 NGO VIP Service Contracts 1 NGO@$333,333.00 a year x 3 years $1,000,000 so $1,000,000 $0 so s0
TOTAL $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $6,800,000
5b. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) Subcontracts Narrative PERSONNEL COSTS & PAYROLL TAXES. S1,838,448.00
O.P.E. Culture seeks to expend their Violence intervention/ Prevention Program by increasing 7 current employees' pay rate to match the current living wage. in addition, current p e employees will increese fo full time. B new hires will be brought on as part of this expansion - B full time Community Intervention Workers / Case Managers and 2 part time. All st will be considered an employee and as such payral/ taxes wil be included in proposed costs. Total of 15 Staff.

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: $58,200.00:MATCH FUNDS: $160,000.00 OTHER COSTS: $112,110.00
included in this section is the cost to cover internet and phone services at Site 2. Each staff member will raceive a phone stipend as some work in the field. Program supplies will be needed to continue general operations.

CAPITAL COSTS: $107,300.00M/ATCH FUNDS: $216,000.00 Facility costs will include rent for 2 sites: Site 1-890 W. Mill Street, San Bemardino CA 92410 Site 2. 1530 E. Date Street Sen Bemardino CA 92406. These areas have bean known to be hot zones for violence and are in need of intervention services. Equipment purchases include: desks, lables, chairs, lapfops, printers for staff and clients.

PARTICIPANT RELATED COSTS: 5100,097.20MATCH FUNDS: $4,000.00 Funding described as participant related costs will consist of community engagements which are vitel in bulling relatfonships with the target individuals. Our proaclive engagements wil vary from the resources offered. Our clients will be offered services according to their individual service plens. These services may include but are not limited to relocation services, work ready documents, job preparedness, job placement, class fees, transportation costs, incentives, food gift cards, etc. Our goal is to help assist our clients in creating pathways to prevent recidivism.

INDIRECT COSTS: $183,844,80
H.O.P.E Culture will provide administrative oversight of the VIP program accounting; bookkeeping, check writing, bank reconcilation, report generating and general maintenance of the account. Indirect costs will be charged as 10% of total dinect salaries and wages. HOPE Total Grant Funds: $2,400,000.00 for three years. The Addional $1,000,000.00 of grant funds will be utilized to support addtional NGO VIP contrects to support a summer violence reduction stratey at thrae parks a yoar for three years. $111,111 per site x 3 = $333,333 x 3 years Summer/Fall 2022, Summer 2023 & 2024, and Spring 2025.

As match the City will Issue three adolitional VIP service contracts contriubting towards this project for a fotal of 33,000,000.00 throughout the grant cycle.

Ga. Equipment/Fixed Assets
Description of Equipment/Fixed Asset Calculation for Expense Grant Funds Match Funds Total $0 $0 $0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0
Gb. Equipment/Fixed Assets Narrative
7a. Project Evaluation (must be at least 5%, but no more than 10% of total grant funds) Description Grant Funds Match Funds Total
Total Praject Coast for Local Evaluator 5% of $3,160,000 = $160,000 $190,000 190,00 $0 $0
TOTAL (must be at least 5%, but no more than 10% of Total Grant Funds) $190,000 $0 $190,000 7b. Project Evaluation Narrative:
8a. Financial Audit (must not exceed $25,000 in Gran! Funds) Description Calculation for Expense Grant Funds Match Funde Total R.A.M.S CPA Services * s0,330 per year for 3 years $25,000 $0 $25,000 TOTAL (must not exceed $25,000 In Grant Funds) $25,000 $0 $25,000 8b. Financial Audit Narrative:

RAMS CPA wil conduct single progrem suan for mree years. it is estmated to cost 57,000 - 59,000 per year. 9a. Other (Travel, Training, etc.)
Description Calculation for Expense Grant Funds Total
Case Management Training Two seasions at $20,000 for a total $40,000 $0 $40,000 Required Set-aside for BSCC Grantee Meetings Air Fair, Hotel, Per Diem for 2 staff x 2 meetings $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL $50,000 $0 $60,000
9b. Other (Travel, Training, etc.) Narrative:

Traver: Mandoory Meetings to B5CC CaVi-4 grantee meelngs, rates to be determined. Training: Grantee wil secure a advance treing for program star. Rates subyect to change. 10a. Indirect Costs
Indirect costs may be charged to grant funds by choosing either Option 1) or 2) listed below: Grant Funds Match Funds Total 1) Indirect costs will be charged as 10% of totel direct salaries and wages: $0 $0 $0 if using Option 1) grant funds allocated to indirect Costs may not exceed: 50 2) Indirect costs will be charged as 5% of direct total direct project costs (excluding equipment): $0 $o (fusing Option 2) grant funds allocated to indirect Costs may not exceed: $182,000 Regardless of which option is chosen, If the amount entered in the Grant Funds column tums red, adjust it to $0 $0 not exceed the maximum noted just below it: TOTAL
10b. Indirect Costs Narrative:

The city will use option 2 to caiculate incirect cost rate at less than 5% of total direct project cost for a fotal of $165.000 City of San Bernardino
BSCC 875-22

Page 1 of 1 ends

APPENDIX A: CalVIP EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE ROSTER
CalVIP Executive Steering Committee - Grant Cycle from July 1, 2022 to December 31, 2025 Name Title & Organizational Affiliation From
Chief Andy Mills, Chair Chief of Police, City of Palm Springs & Palm Springs Board Member, BSCC
2 Teacher, Lee V. Pollard High School San Diego
Stephen Lindley
3 Tina Curiel-Allen Cal Crew Program Manager, Five Keys Central Valley 4 Natasha Mejia Policy Aiminat Justice Retoriute for Oakland 5 Tina Rodriguez Statewide Manager, Californians for Safety Central Valley and Justice
6 Mike McLively Senior Staff event ductrolence Center to San Francisco 7 Gaynorann Siataga Community Advocat, Al Islanders Gather San Francisco 8 Saun Hough CA Partnership y and Ju, Caltomians for Los Angeles 9 Supervising Attorney, Sacramento County
Mark Slaughter Public Defender's Office Sacramento
10 CEO, Women Initiating Success Envisioned
Jackie Reed San Diego
Inc.
11 Policy Analyst, State Bar of California
Jessie Leavitt Senior corporate Counsel, NetScou Oakland Systems, Inc.
12 Tim Komegay Director, LiveFree California Los Angeles Mary Roberts State of CA Retiree, Administrative Office of the Courts Oakland
14 Mona Cadena Advocacy Director, Equal Justice USA San Francisco 15 Amir Chapel Policy Aiminal, Justice Retoriute for Marina 16 Keith Baker Re County Department of Pubile Hengeles Los Angeles City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 1 of 2 ends

APPENDIX B: Criteria for Non-Governmental Organizations Receiving BSCC Funds The California Violence Intervention and Prevention (CalVIP) Grant Program Request tor Proposals (RFP) includes requirements that apply to non-governmental organizations that receive funds under this grant. All grantees are responsible for ensuring that any contracted third parties continually meet these requirements as a condition of receiving CalVIP funds. The RFP describes these requirements as follows:

Any non-governmental organization that receives CalVIP grant funds (as either subgrantee or subcontractor) must:
• Have been duly organized, in existence, and in good standing for at least six (6) months prior to the effective date of its fiscal agreement with the BSCC or with the CalVIP grantee;
• Non-governmental entities that have recently reorganized or have merged with other qualified non-governmental entities that were in existence prior to the six-month date are also eligible, provided all necessary agreements have been executed and filed with the California Secretary of State prior to the start date of the grant agreement with the BSCC or the start date of the grantee-subcontractor fiscal agreement;
• Be a nonprofit and recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) organization;
• Employ persons or volunteers that have a minimum of three (3) years of combined experience in implementing violence reduction strategies and have implemented these strategies within the past five (5) years;
• Be registered with the California Secretary of State's Office; • Have an Employer Identification Number (EIN);
• Have a valid business license, if applicable;
• Have any other state or local licenses or certifications necessary to provide the services requested (e.g., facility licensing by the Department of Health Care Services), if applicable; and
• Have a physical address in the State of California. (An agent for service of process with a California address is insufficient.)
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-22

Page 2 of 2 ends

Provide your agency name and in the table list information for all contracted parties.

Grantee:

Name of Contracted Party Address Emall / Phone Meets All Requirements
HOPE Culture, Inc 990 West Mill Street [email protected] Yes In No D San Bernardino, CA 92410 909-449-7357
Yes D NoO
Yes • NoD
Yes D NoD
Yes O NoO
Grantees are required to update this list and submit it to BSCC any time a new third-party contract is executed after the initial assurance date. Grantees shall retain (on-site) applicable source documentation for each contracted party that verifies compliance with the requirements listed in the 2021 CalVIP RFP. These records will be subject to the records and retention language found in Appendices A and C of the Standard Agreement.

Unless prior approval is obtained, the BSCC prohibits disbursement or reimbursement to any NGO that does not meet the requirements listed above and for which the BSCC does not have a signed grantee assurance on file.

A signature below is an assurance that all requirements listed above have been met.

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
(This document must be signed by the person who is authorized to sign the Grant Agreement.)

NAME OF AUTHORIZED OFFICER TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER
Robert D. Field 909-384-5122
City Manager ZIP CODE

STREET ADDRESS STATE
290 North D Street San Bernardino CA 92336

EMAIL ADDRESS
[email protected]
DATE
7/12/2022

← All documents from this meeting