Cities Index.
Attachment 2 - TCC Round 6 Project Development Application Materials (Sample)

Mayor and City Council
September 16, 2026

Document
Attachment 2 - TCC Round 6 Project Development Application Materials (Sample)
Meeting
September 16, 2026
Body
Mayor and City Council
Original file
652 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sanbernardino.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

LCI - Public
Collaborative Governance Agreement Worksheet (SAMPLE)
Terms
The Collaborative Governance Agreement worksheet is a simplified tool designed to support Applicants in developing a formal Collaborative Governance Agreement. The questions below will support Applicants in meeting all Collaborative Governance Agreement requirements by describing the roles and responsibilities of the Lead Applicant, all Co-Applicants, and additional members who will be recruited to participate. If a question has multiple components, Applicants are required to answer all parts to the best of their ability.

The Lead Applicant and Co-Applicants are required to sign this worksheet before uploading to Submittable. You may add additional Co-Applicant signature lines as needed.

If awarded, this worksheet will be the foundation for the final agreement and will govern the Collaborative until the final agreement is executed. SGC may request changes to the terms of the Collaborative Governance Agreement during the Post-Award Consultation Process. Awardees must build out, formalize, and execute the final Collaborative Governance Agreement no later than 90 days after grant execution.

Narrative Responses (required)

1. Identify the Lead Applicant and each Co-Applicant.

Click or tap here to enter text.

2. Describe the partnership structure of the Collaborative Governance Structure.

Click or tap here to enter text.

3. How many representatives will be involved from each of the following entities? a. Lead-Applicant:
b. Co-applicants: Click or tap here to enter text.
c. Residents: Click or tap here to enter text.

4. List the roles and responsibilities of the Lead Applicant and each Co-applicant, including, contributions to:
a. the Collaborative Governance Structure: Click or tap here to enter text. b. projects, programming, and/or required plans: Click or tap here to enter text.

5. How will residents and/or community representatives be selected to participate in the collaborative? Identify the roles and responsibilities of residents and/or community representatives, including expectations, and commitment terms.

ATTACHMENT 2

LCI - Public
Click or tap here to enter text.

6. Describe the process for involving local residents in decision-making.

Click or tap here to enter text.

7. Describe the anticipated compensation plan for local residents participating in the Collaborative.

Click or tap here to enter text.

8. Describe the Collaborative’s collective decision-making process.

Click or tap here to enter text.

9. Describe how the Collaborative will handle disputes.

Click or tap here to enter text.

10. Describe the procedures the Collaborative will use to change, add, or remove members.

Click or tap here to enter text.

11. Describe the Collaborative Governance Structure meeting facilitation procedures, including:
a. Frequency of meetings and purpose: Click or tap here to enter text. b. Minimum number of meetings open to the public: Click or tap here to enter text.
c. Means for publishing meeting agenda and notes for public access: Click or tap here to enter text.
d. And measures to make the meeting accessible: Click or tap here to enter text.

12. Describe the financial relationship between the Lead Applicant and Co-Applicants, including:
a. Anticipated reimbursement process
b. Financial Distributor:
c. Recipient of payment:
d. Frequency of payment or reimbursement:

LCI - Public

13. Did the applicant team notify surrounding Tribes of their project? (Yes/No) a. If yes, please describe the efforts made to connect with and notify surrounding Tribes of the project.

Click or tap here to enter text.
b. If no, explain why not.

Click or tap here to enter text.

14. Does the Collaborative include any California Native American Tribes or Tribally- owned nonprofits as the Lead Applicant or Co-Applicant? (Yes/No) a. If yes, is the Lead Applicant requiring the Tribal entity to sign a Waiver of Sovereign Immunity (Yes/No)? Click or tap here to enter text. b. Please describe the measures the Collaborative Governance Structure will assume to ensure Tribes’:
i. Sovereign status is respected and upheld: Click or tap here to enter text.
ii. Confidentiality of Tribal data and Traditional Ecological Knowledge:

Click or tap here to enter text.

15. Tribal Lead applicants may request modifications to one or more requirements of the Collaborative Governance Structure. Does the Tribal Lead Applicant need any exemptions? If yes, please identify the exemptions requested and provide a brief explanation.

Click or tap here to enter text.

16. Does the proposed project area cross multiple jurisdictions or tribal territory boundaries or similarly relevant jurisdictional boundaries? (Yes/No) a. If yes, list all jurisdictional boundaries: Click or tap here to enter text.

17. Does the Collaborative Structure include a member that has jurisdictional authority over each jurisdictional boundary included within the Project Area? (Yes/No) a. If no, Lead Applicant must upload a Letter of Support from the relevant agency(ies) with authority over the Project Area jurisdiction(s) not covered by the Collaborative Governance Structure.

Click or tap here to enter text.

LCI - Public

18. How will the public agencies and/or Tribal governments with jurisdictional authority over the Project Area coordinate and implement the grant collectively? Click or tap here to enter text.

Acknowledgements
Legal and Financial Responsibility
The Lead Applicant will maintain legal, fiscal and fiduciary responsibilities, including managing grant funds in accordance with SGC regulations, policies and guidelines. The Lead Applicant is responsible for the development and submission of all reports to TCC Program staff and additional funding agencies, bookkeeping, accounting, and grant compliance services.

Non-Discrimination
The Lead Applicant and Co-Applicants are committed to equal employment opportunity and to ensuring that all employees have a work environment that is free of conduct that could be considered discriminatory or harassing based on an employee’s protected status. The Lead Applicant and Co-Applicants will not allow anyone, including any supervisor, co-worker, vendor, client, or customer, to unlawfully harass or discriminate against employees or applicants for employment. The Lead Applicant will take prompt and effective remedial action upon discovery of such conduct.

Miscellaneous Provisions
This Agreement may be revised during Post-Award Consultation or upon written agreement of the parties to comply with all administrative, statutory, and TCC Program requirements.

This Agreement creates no right, benefit, or trust responsibility, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or equity. The parties shall manage their respective resources and activities in a separate, coordinated, and mutually beneficial manner to meet the purposes of this Agreement.

Lead Applicant Signature Line
_____________________________
[Insert name of Lead Applicant, name of authorized signatory and their role in the organization.]

LCI - Public
Co-Applicant 1 Signature Line
_____________________________
[Insert name of Co-Applicant, name of authorized signatory and their role in the organization.]
Co-Applicant 2 Signature Line
_____________________________
[Insert name of Co-Applicant, name of authorized signatory and their role in the organization.]
Co-Applicant 3 Signature Line
_____________________________
[Insert name of Co-Applicant, name of authorized signatory and their role in the organization.]
Co-Applicant 4 Signature Line
_____________________________
[Insert name of Co-Applicant, name of authorized signatory and their role in the organization.]
Co-Applicant 5 Signature Line

LCI - Public
_____________________________
[Insert name of Co-Applicant, name of authorized signatory and their role in the organization.]

Transformative Climate Communities (TCC)
Program: Instructions for Round 6 Application on
Submittable
Last updated: 05/29/2026
Thank you for your interest in applying to California Strategic Growth Council’s (SGC) Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) Round 6 Project Development Grant! Funding availability: Approximately $15 million is available for three Project Development Grant awards of up to $5 million each. The application period will begin on May 29, 2026 and close on September 30, 2026 at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

For more information about the TCC program and other grant types, please visit our website at https://sgc.ca.gov/grant-programs/tcc/round-6/.

Before you begin, a few items to keep in mind:
● The email address that you use to initiate the application becomes the Lead Applicant.
o The Lead Applicant submits the application on behalf of all their Co-Applicants.
● Please be sure the email address you used to sign up for your Submittable account is one that you check regularly.
● Carefully consider which email address you will use to create a Submittable account. Once an application is initiated, we are unable to transfer it to another account.
o TCC recommends using an email address that is accessible by multiple individuals at the organization.
o If a shared email is not possible, consider sharing log-in credentials to the Submittable account.

How do I begin?
● Set up an account here
● If you already have an account, log in here: account login ● If you lost or forgot your password, follow the instructions here: I forgot my password
As you work on your application, please keep in mind:
● Submittable automatically saves your progress after every change you make.

You can begin and come back to the application forms at any time before the submission due date.
● You can manually save your draft by clicking the “save draft” button at the bottom to ensure your most recently answered questions get saved. ● Collaborators can work on a form simultaneously. However, due to the editing limitations mentioned below, we recommend you draft your responses using the templates before entering your final responses on Submittable.

● To view your draft and continue working on the application, sign in to your Submittable account, click the “drafts” button, and choose “continue.” How can I return to a saved draft? ● If you are trying to click the “submit” button and nothing is happening, please go back

through

the

form

and

ensure

you

have

entered

in

all

required

information. ● If you have questions about Submittable, please contact: https://submittable1.my.site.com/submittablehelp/s/14873512 ● Submitters can withdraw a submission at any time. To withdraw an active submission, follow the steps found here: Withdrawing a Submission ● SGC will not accept late submissions or revisions after the application deadline. Overview of submittable steps : 1. To start your application on Submittable, click here: Project Development Grant Application. 2. You will be prompted to set up an account or log in. Keep in mind that the email address

that

you

use

to

initiate

the

application

becomes

the

Lead

Applicant.

The

Lead

Applicant

will

submit

the

application

on

behalf

of

all

their

Co-Applicants.

3. Once you are logged in, search for the Lead Applicant’s organization. If there is no

result,

select

“skip

and

continue

to

application.”

4. Complete the screening question about the Lead Applicant’s entity type. If the Lead

Applicant

is

not

an

eligible

entity

type,

you

will

not

be

able

to

proceed

with

the

rest

of

the

application.

5. Complete the next page of questions. You do not need to add collaborators at this

stage.

You

will

be

able

to

add

your

Co-Applicants

as

collaborators

at

the

next

step.

Click

“Submit”

when

you

have

completed

this

page.

6. You will be redirected to a Success! page. To continue the application, return to the

submissions

page

by

clicking

“Submissions”

at

the

top

of

the

page.

7. Click on your submission number “###” then click on the “Forms” tab. 8. Scroll down on the page to see the "Project Development Narrative Questions” form

under

“Request

Forms.”

The

Lead

Applicant

may

grant

access

to

Co-Applicants.

9. To grant access to Co-Applicants, click “Open.” Then click “Manage Collaborators”

and

follow

the

instructions.

10. All applicants can refer to this Google Drive folder to view and download templates of each form to prepare your answers outside of Submittable. Files that

are

in

a

zip

folder

contain

Excel

workbooks.

You

must

download

the

file,

complete

the

template,

save

the

file

according

to

the

naming

convention,

and

upload

it

to

the

respective

form

field

in

Submittable.

a. For all applicants and especially applicants who have been connected to Application

Technical

Assistance

Providers,

we

recommend

drafting

your

materials

using

these

templates

to

ease

coordination

within

your

organizations

and

to

reduce

the

need

to

make

edits

in

Submittable.

11. Only the Lead Applicant can submit a form. Once a form has been submitted, you

will

automatically

receive

an

email

confirming

your

submission.

12. If you do not see the email, go to “My Submissions” and scroll to the bottom of the

page

in

the

“Forms”

tab

to

review

all

your

submitted

forms.

If

you

still

need
assistance with confirming a submission, please email [email protected]. 13. If you need to make an edit after a form has been submitted, please click “Edit” on

the

top

right

corner

of

your

submissions

page.

Please

note

that

you

are

only

able

to

submit

one

edit

request

per

day

on

Submittable

for

the

entire

application.

Please

coordinate

with

all

Co-Applicants

accordingly

and

submit

edit

requests

with

ample

time

before

the

application

deadline.

TCC

is

not

responsible

for

edit

requests

submitted

near

the

application

deadline

that

cannot

be

addressed

before

the

application

closes.

In

your

message

to

TCC,

please

identify

in

detail

which

forms

and

which

questions

you

wish

to

edit,

and

what

you

want

to

change

your

response

to.

a. Due to the limitations of editing, TCC highly recommends you prepare your

answers

using

the

templates

provided

and

use

Submittable

only

for

the

final

responses.

14. Once you have completed all the required forms, your application will be considered

submitted

once

the

application

period

closes.

There

is

no

final

confirmation

that

your

application

is

complete.

As a reminder, the application deadline is Wednesday, September 30, 2026 at 11:59 pm PT
.

Late submissions are not allowed. All submissions must be made on Submittable. Please email [email protected] if you have any questions. We look forward to reviewing your application. Sincerely, The TCC Team

TCC Round 6 Project Development Instructions and
Narrative Questions
Instructions for the Transformative Climate Communities Round 6 Project Development Grant application are below. This template document includes the full list of narrative questions required. You can use this as a guide to prepare to fill out the application through the Submittable website.

Note: This template should not be used as the primary application resource. In the event of any differences and omissions on the template from the actual application on Submittable, the content on Submittable are final and official. Narrative question templates are meant to provide an overview of the content of the TCC application. You are encouraged to draft your responses in the template due to the editing limitation on Submittable. However, when submitting your final responses, please check to make sure your response completely answers the question in Submittable. SGC will only accept applications that have been completed in Submittable.

The application period begins on May 29, 2026 and closes on September 30, 2026 at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Application Materials and Submission Process
All applications must be submitted via the online application platform, Submittable. No hard copies, facsimiles, electronic transmissions via email, hand-delivered copies, or any other method of submitting complete applications will be accepted.

Refer to the Submittable instructions here.

For any Excel workbooks, we strongly recommend opening these in the desktop version of Excel. Please double check formulas once completed to make sure that all the formulas stay accurate.

The scoring criteria listed with each question (where applicable) corresponds to the scoring criteria most relevant to the question. The purpose of this information is to help applicants understand how reviewers will evaluate each response. However, please note that all scoring criteria will be scored holistically based on all information provided across all questions and application components.

On Submittable, please complete the Project Development Grant initial form to begin the application process. In order for the entire application to be complete, you also need to submit the following Request Form: Project Development Narrative Questions.

Please follow these instructions to access the additional Request Forms. Visit your Submittable account by following this link.

1. Click on your submission number. 2. Click on the Forms tabs to see the Project Development Narrative Questions form.

3. Select Open to start the form. Click Continue if you have already started a form. 4. When you have completed the form, click Submit. We encourage you to draft your responses using the Word and Excel templates provided in a folder here. 5. Click "Back to Forms" to return to the previous page and repeat steps 1-5, if applicable.

6. At the bottom of the Forms tab, you will see any forms you have submitted.

If you do not submit the Project Development Narrative Questions request form, your application

will

be

considered

incomplete

and

will

not

be

scored.

INITIAL FORM The questions below are in the Project Development initial form that applicants will fill out

to

initiate

the

full

application.

Executive Summary 1. Provide an overview of the project and intended results. (200 words):

Basic Lead Applicant Information Lead Applicants must be one of the eligible entities listed in Guidelines Section 3.1.

Either

the

Lead

Applicant

or

one

of

the

Co-Applicants

must

be

a

public

agency.

1. Name of organization 2. Organization mailing address 3. What type of eligible organization are you? a. Local Government [Public Agencies, Local Agencies, Special Districts] b. Utilities [Public Utilities, Local Publicly Owned Utilities, Mutual Water Companies]
c. California Native American Tribe d. Joint Powers Authority e. Nonprofit [including Tribally-owned nonprofit] A California Native American Tribe is a federally recognized Native American Tribe or a non-federally

recognized

Native

American

Tribe

listed

on

the

California

Tribal

Consultation List maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission on February 19,

2026).

A California Native American Tribally-owned nonprofit (also referred to as a Tribally-owned

nonprofit
)

refers

to

an

organization

exempt

from

taxation

under

Internal

Revenue

Code

501

(c)(3)

(26

U.S.C.

§

501(c)(3)),

nonprofit

organization

incorporated

under

Tribal

law,

California

nonprofit

public

benefit

corporation

(Corp.

Code,

§

5110

et

seq.),

or

an

equivalent

entity

that

has

a

majority

Tribal-led

board,

is

operated

by

a

Tribe,

and

advances

the

Tribe’s

goals

and

priorities.

This

term

does

not

include

nonprofit

organizations

owned

or

controlled

by

individuals

who

are

Native

American

or

individual

member(s)

of

a

California

Native

American

Tribe

when

the

organization

is

not

associated

with

a

California

Native

American

Tribe.

4. Is the Lead Applicant a California Native American Tribe or Tribally-owned nonprofit?
a. California Native American Tribe b. Tribally-owned nonprofit a. Describe how the Lead Applicant organization meets the definition of

a

Tribally-owned

nonprofit.

Identify

the

California

Native

American

Tribe

that

operates

the

Tribally-owned

nonprofit.

(200

words)
c. Neither 5. Is the Lead Applicant a nonprofit or a community-based organization? 6. Lead Applicant contact name 7. Lead Applicant contact phone number 8. Lead Applicant contact email address 9. What is the size of the Lead Applicant’s organization? a. Less than 10 members b. 10-25 members c. 25+ members 10. Has the Lead Applicant previously received a grant from the Strategic Growth Council?
d. Yes ● When was your previous SGC grant awarded, and which program was involved?
e. No 11. How many Co-Applicants are involved? At least two Co-Applicants is required for Project

Development

Grants.

Enter

a

numeric

value.

12. Contact Information for Co-Applicants. Note: Please fill out the following table.

Partner #
Co-Applicant/Partner Name
Email Phone
1 2 3...

Basic Grant Proposal Information 1. What is the name of your grant proposal? 2. Which county will be served by this grant? 3. Will grant activities be located within a Metropolitan Planning Organization? If so, which

one?

4. Is the Project Area located within federally recognized Tribal boundaries? For the following questions, see the link to find your representatives: https://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/.

5. What California Senate District is the Project Area located in? 6. What California Assembly District is the Project Area located in? 7. How much funding are you requesting? Enter in a numeric value 8. Will the requested funding cover the entire cost of the projects? 9. Have the projects been awarded other funding sources? o Yes o No 10. Have you used technical assistance through the State to prepare this application?
o Yes o No 11. Are you also applying to Round 2 of the Community Resilience Centers Program?

o Note: Per the TCC and CRC Guidelines, applicants may apply for multiple funding

programs

to

accomplish

the

same

scope

of

work.

However,

awarded

applicants

will

only

be

able

to

receive

full

funding

from

the

one

award.

If

selected

for

more

than

one

award,

the

scope

of

work

will

be

modified

to

eliminate

duplication

or

supplantation

of

funding.
a. Yes b. No

Climate Bond Eligibility Proposals must meet the following requirements to be eligible for funding through the Climate

Bond,

the

funding

source

for

TCC

Round

6. Your

responses

can

consider

the

eventual

implementation

of

the

project(s)

that

will

result

from

your

Project

Development

Grant

work.

1. Will your project bolster California’s resilience to climate impacts, including extreme

heat,

wildfire,

flood,

drought,

and

sea

level

rise?

(Yes/No)
a. Describe how in 1-2 sentences: 2. Will your projects reduce greenhouse gas emissions and/or sequester and store carbon?

(Yes/No)
a. Describe how in 1-2 sentences: 3. Are your projects designed to be resilient to climate impacts, including extreme heat,

wildfire,

flood,

drought,

and

sea

level

rise?

(Yes/No)
a. Describe how in 1-2 sentences: 4. Does your project support planning, capacity building, workforce training, or monitoring

activities

that

will

protect

people

and/or

nature

from

climate

change

impacts

or

reduce/remove

greenhouse

gas

emissions?

(Y/N)
a. Describe how in 1-2 sentences:

REQUEST FORM
Application Instructions
The questions below are in the Project Development Request Form that applicants will request

to

continue

responding

to

rest

of

the

full

application.

Please

note

that

all

scored

questions

are

in

the

Request

Form.

Please

note

that

there

are

some

unscored

questions

and

scored

sections

within

the

Request

Form,

which

have

been

demarked

by

an

(
unscored
)

or

(
scored
)

in

the

title

of

the

section.

The application period begins on May 29, 2026, and closes on September 30, 2026, at 11:59

pm

Pacific

Time
.

● Each question contains an associated word count. Responses that exceed the limit

will

not

be

allowed.
● Formatting such as bullet points and lettering (a, b, c), may be used to organize responses.

Avoid

excessive

formatting

so

that

responses

are

easy

to

read.
● The scoring criteria listed with each question (where applicable) corresponds to the

scoring

criteria

most

relevant

to

the

question.

The

purpose

of

this

information

is

to

help

applicants

understand

how

reviewers

will

evaluate

each

response.

However, please note that all scoring criteria will be scored holistically based on all

information

provided

across

all

questions

and

application

components.

Proposed Project Development Activities

1. Upload the Excel workbook containing your work plan and budget. Use the template here. 2. Summarize the proposed grant activities and describe the overall goals and outcomes

of

each

task.

See

Section

5.2 of

the

TCC

Guidelines

for

guidance

on

eligible

Project

Development

Grant

activities.

(
300

words
)

1. Applicant Eligibility (unscored) 1. If the Lead Applicant is a public agency, upload evidence of a passed formal resolution

that

includes

authorization

to

apply

for

and

accept

a

TCC

grant

and
execute all documents as needed. Optional template: Council Resolution 2. California Native American Tribes serving as Lead Applicant may instead upload a

letter

from

a

Tribal

Chairperson

or

a

passed

formal

resolution

that

includes:
a. Authorization to apply for and accept a TCC grant b. Authority to execute all related documents if awarded. 3. If the application is chosen for award, a formal resolution will be required before the grant can be executed. Optional template: Tribal Resolution 4. If the Lead Applicant is a Tribally-owned nonprofit, upload a Letter of Support from

the

Tribal

Chairperson

authorizing

the

application

on

behalf

of

the

Tribe.

Optional template: Tribal Resolution
Tribal applicants are not required to have Co-Applicants unless other entities will lead specific

components

of

the

grant-funded

work

(such

as

Projects

under

an

Implementation

Grant).

These

entities,

including

any

additional

Tribes,

must

be

included

as

Co-Applicants.

5. Upload: Letters of Support from relevant cities or counties, if applicable. Optional template: Letter of Support 6. Are you a Tribal Lead Applicant applying without any Co-Applicants? a. Yes b. No Project Area Eligibility Project Area refers to the boundary of the focus area where the grant activities will occur.

Focus

areas

must

include

a

specific

neighborhood

or

community

with

demonstrated needs for planning and implementing integrated infrastructure and connectivity. The selected Project Area must meet the requirements outlined in Section 3.3 of the TCC Guidelines. ● Link to the mapping tool: TCC Round 6 Mapping Tool ● Tutorial for incorporated applicants - https://arcg.is/1rf8901 ● Tutorial for Tribal Applicants - https://arcg.is/1qreyX2 ● Tutorial for disadvantaged unincorporated communities applicants - https://arcg.is/0uS4D90 ● For applicants who will submit local data for your self-identified disadvantaged unincorporated Project Areas, click to view the instructions to submit local data. Tribal Modifications Lead Applicants who are California Native American Tribes and Tribally-owned nonprofits

have

additional

flexibility

for

certain

Project

Area

requirements

(Project

Area

size

and

continuity)

and

may

request

further

modifications.

See

Section

3.3 of

the

TCC

Guidelines

(pages

37-38)

for

more

details.

Tribal applicants can submit a Project Area consisting of multiple non-adjacent areas if the

following

requirements

are

met:

1. All areas must be located within the same region and close enough to support regular

in-person

collaboration

during

the

grant

term

2. If multiple Tribes are submitting a single application, at least some proposed activities

must

involve

and

directly

benefit

all

Tribes

participating

in

the

application
● Are you a Tribal applicant with a Project Area that consists of multiple non-adjacent

areas?
ο Yes ▪ If yes, describe how your Project Area meets the two requirements above.
ο No Lead Applicants who are California Native American Tribes or Tribally-owned nonprofits may

request

additional

modifications

to

additional

Project

Area

requirements,

including

priority

population

requirements.

Select

all

that

apply:

● This does not apply to me/I am not requesting a modification. ● I submitted a request to SGC and SGC approved it. ● I submitted a request to SGC and have not yet heard back. ● I would like to request my first modification(s) now. ● I would like to request additional modification(s) now. If you selected “I would like to request my first/additional modification(s) now,” respond to

the

following

questions

in

the

text

box

below

or

in

an

attachment.

● Requirement: Which requirement are you requesting to modify? If applicable,

which

specific

portion(s)

of

the

requirement

are

you

requesting

to

modify?
● Proposed modification: What are you proposing as an alternative? ● Justification: Why is this modification necessary? How will the alternative fulfill

the

intent

of

the

original

requirement?
Rural Areas Modification
Lead Applicants whose Project Areas are in rural areas may request TCC approval for a non-continuous Project Area. See Section 3.3 of the TCC Guidelines for TCC definition of rural communities.

1. Are you an applicant with a rural Project Area looking to submit a non-continuous Project

Area?
○ No, my Project Area is not rural. ○ Yes, my Project Area is rural, and I am seeking approval for a non-continuous

Project

Area.

■ 2. Select which applies: ● I submitted a request to SGC and SGC approved it. ● I submitted a request to SGC and have not yet heard back. ● I would like to submit a request for a non-continuous Project Area

now.
○ 3. Respond to the all the follow questions in the text box

below

or

in

an

attachment:
■ Why is a non-continuous Project Area
necessary

for

your

community?
■ How will your proposed Project Area fulfill the intent

of

the

Project

Area

requirements

and

the

goals

of

the

TCC

Program?

Project Area Information
See the TCC Mapping Tool for calculations.

CalEnviroScreen 4.0 (CES) disadvantaged communities (DAC) are areas with census tracts

that

have

a

CES

cumulative

impacts

score

at

or

above

the

75th

percentile,

or

where

there

are

census

tracts

that

lack

overall

scores

in

CES

due

to

data

gaps

but

received

CES

cumulative

pollution

burden

scores

at

or

above

the

95th

percentile.

These

areas

have

been

consolidated

into

the

CES

DAC

layer

in

the

Mapping

Tool.

● What is the percentage of your Project Area that falls within disadvantaged community

census

tracts

per

CES?
● What is the percentage of your Project Area that is within federally recognized Tribal

boundaries?
● What is the percentage of your Project Area that is in eligible disadvantaged unincorporated

communities?

(Note:

see

Section

3.3 of

the

TCC

Guidelines

for

more

information)
● What is the percentage of the Project Area that is not a disadvantaged community

but

is

in

a

low-income

community

per

AB

1550?
For Project Areas that include disadvantaged unincorporated communities: Select which eligibility

method(s)

you

are

using.

See

complete

descriptions

in

Section

3.3 of

the

Guidelines.

Applicants

who

establish

eligibility

through

LAFCo

status

or

local

data
must submit supporting documentation. See the TCC Mapping Tool for more. ● Unincorporated areas that are within the Project Area boundaries of a previously awarded

TCC

Planning

Grant

or

Project

Development

Grant

that

established

eligibility

as

a

disadvantaged

unincorporated

community
● Verification of disadvantaged unincorporated community status through the Local Agency

Formation

Commission

(LAFCo)

or

another

local

agency,

AND

census

tracts

have

CES

DACs.
● No verification of disadvantaged unincorporated community status from a LAFCo or

equivalent

public

agency

but

Project

Area

meets

all

of

the

following

criteria:

ο DAC census tracts per CES ο Project Area contains at least one cluster of unincorporated parcels at a density

of

250

parcels

per

square

mile

OR

at

least

one

Census

Designated

Place

with

a

total

population

of

at

least

250

residents
ο Hard-to-count census block group (score of 57 or higher) per the California

Hard-to-Count

Index
ο I would like to submit local data as a self-identified disadvantaged unincorporated

community.
● If you would like to submit local data as a self-identified disadvantaged unincorporated

community,

you

must

demonstrate

that

the

community

has

all

of

the

following.

ο A pollution or environmental burden ο Socioeconomic factors designating the community as disadvantaged (see Appendix A on the use of the term “disadvantaged”) ο Sufficient density of at least one cluster of unincorporated parcels at a density

of

250

parcels

per

square

mile,

or

a

total

population

of

at

least

250

residents.
● If you are a self-identified disadvantaged community, select one: ο I submitted local data to SGC and it has been pre-approved. ♣ If you have already submitted local data, please provide the date it was

submitted

or

approved.
ο I submitted local data to SGC and have not heard back yet. ♣ If you have already submitted local data, please provide the date it was

submitted

or

approved.
ο I would like to submit local data now.

For local data submission, the data may be quantitative, qualitative, or both. We have created a tutorial to demonstrate how to gather your local data for submission. Examples of local data include but are not limited to any combination of the following:
● Designation as a disadvantaged unincorporated community or a disadvantaged community

by

the

county’s

Environmental

Justice

or

Land

Use

Element

of

the

General

Plan

● Qualitative description of environmental or pollution burdens, exposures, and effects

on

the

community

● CalEnviroScreen pollution burden indicators at or above the 75th percentile ● Healthy Places Index 3.0 score at or below the 25th percentile ● Population count estimates from Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s LandScan tool Other supplemental data to support the self-identified disadvantaged unincorporated community

status

request

may

include

but

is

not

limited

to

local

climate

and

environmental

quantitative

data,

local

climate

action

plans,

and

peer-reviewed

academic
journals and articles. The Vulnerable Communities Platform provides a collection of climate and environmental data sources and a mapping tool to support the identification of

current

and

projected

climate

hazards

in

communities.

To reference data from the VCP, click on VCP Report Generator, choose the scale that best

captures

your

Project

Area

(census

block

group,

census

tract,

zip

code,

city,

town,

or

unincorporated

area).

On

the

map,

use

the

search

bar

or

zoom

to

your

Project

Area.

Click

on

the

approximate

center

of

your

project

area

to

retrieve

the

GEOID

from

the

pop-up.

Then

enter

the

GEOID

where

it

says

“Enter

a

value”

on

the

left.

Click

on

the

“Run” button and wait for the report to generate. The tool will take a minute or two to generate.

Once

it

is

complete,

click

on

“VCP

Report

Generator

Complete

at…”

then

click

on

“report.pdf”

to

see

the

result.

See

the

climate

hazards

in

your

Project

Area

on

page

2. Save

a

copy

of

this

report

and

upload

it

to

include

it

as

part

of

your

local

data.

● Upload: If you would like to submit local data now, upload your local data submission

as

a

PDF

or

Word

document.

● Upload: Upload a PDF map of your Project Area. ● Upload: Upload a ZIP file containing the shapefile of your Project Area. ● Describe how the proposed activities will further the neighborhood’s ability to build

future

climate

resilient

infrastructure

and

social

resilience.

2. Funding Goals and Priority Points (unscored) SGC includes Funding Goals and Priority Points (see Section 9.4 of the TCC Guidelines for more information). Answer these questions to determine your eligibility.

1. Is the Lead Applicant a California Native American Tribe or a Tribally-owned nonprofit

as

defined

by

the

TCC

Guidelines?
a. Yes b. No c. Unsure 2. If you answered No or Unsure to the previous question, does your application meet

both

of

these

criteria?
o The Lead Applicant is a nonprofit whose mission is primarily focused on

serving

Tribal

communities,

AND
o The proposed grant activities are primarily focused on serving Tribal communities.

o Yes o No o Unsure a. If unsure: Please explain why you are unsure: An application will be eligible for the Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community Funding

Goal

if

all

of

the

following

conditions

are

met:

● More than 75% of the Project Area is unincorporated. ● More than 75% of Project Area residents live in disadvantaged unincorporated communities

as

defined

by

the

TCC

Guidelines.

● At least 75% of the TCC funds and at least 75% of overall project funds (TCC funds

+

leverage

funding)

are

for

projects

in

the

disadvantaged

unincorporated

community as defined by the TCC Guidelines. These funds can go towards a combination

of:

a. Fixed-location projects in disadvantaged unincorporated communities b. Projects or programs serving residents of disadvantaged unincorporated

communities

3. Do you meet the criteria for the Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community Funding

Goal?
● Yes ● No ● Unsure ο Please explain why you are unsure. Previous LCI and SGC grantees will be eligible for priority points if the application’s Project

Area

is

in

the

same

area

as

the

previous

work,

at

least

one

of

the

applicants

are

was

a

Lead

Applicant

or

Co-Applicant

on

the

previous

grant,

and

the

work

is

a

direct

continuation

of

the

previously

funded

work.

4. Does your application meet the criteria for the priority points for previous LCI and SGC

grantees?

● Yes ● No ● Unsure 5. If you answered yes, for each previous grant, provide: 1. Program and round number 2. Lead Applicant name 3. A brief explanation of how the TCC application meets the three criteria above.

6. If you are unsure, please explain why you are unsure.

3. Program Policy Priorities (unscored) Consistency with Existing Local Land Use and Transportation Plans The TCC application must be consistent with all relevant land use plans and related items

including:

● General plans ● Local hazard mitigation plans ● Climate action plans ● Tribally led and created plans ● Zoning ● Building intensity and density requirements ● Design guidelines

1. List the applicable plans that the TCC application is consistent with. (200 words) 2. Upload a letter signed by the local jurisdiction’s Planning and Public Works Departments,

or

equivalents,

to

verify

that

the

application

is

consistent

with

all

of
the items listed above. Optional template: Planning Consistency

The State of California's Planning Priorities are as follows:
o Promote infill development and equity by rehabilitating, maintaining, and improving

existing

infrastructure.
o Protect, preserve and enhance environmental and agricultural lands and natural

and

recreational

resources.
o Encourage location- and resource-efficient new development. 3. Explain how the proposed activities are consistent with the State Planning Priorities

listed

above.

Describe

how

your

long-term

vision

considers

these

priorities

within

the

context

of

local

needs

and

capacities.

The

full

text

of

The
State of California’s Planning Priorities are contained in Section 65041.1 of the Government Code. ( 200 words ) (1.6)

4. Objectives and Vision (scored) The following questions discuss how your Project Development Grant proposal fulfills TCC

Program

Objectives

and establishes a specific vision

for

community

transformation. The

TCC

Program

Objectives

are

to:

● Achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ● Improve public health and environmental benefits ● Expand economic opportunity and shared prosperity

1. Provide a clear Vision Statement that is specific to the community and aligns with the

TCC

Program

Objectives.

(
100

words
)

(1.1)

2. Describe how the proposed activities address the Vision Statement and will achieve

all

TCC

Program

Objectives.

(
300

words
)

(1.2)

3. Describe your community. Descriptions may include but are not limited to community

history,

community

composition,

geographical

context,

economic

conditions

and

industries,

historical

trends,

challenges,

strengths,

and

opportunities.

Please

address

any

public

health,

environmental,

and

economic

challenges

and

opportunities

for

Project

Area

residents.

Please

include

the

total

population

size.

(
500

words
)

(1.3)

4. Describe why your community/Project Area is ready to implement a TCC grant, including

community

resources

and

assets,

community

history,

relationships

and

partnerships,

community

planning

processes

undertaken,

recent

investments,

and

other

factors

that

will

make

the

proposed

TCC

activities

successful.

(
300

words
)

(1.3)

5. Describe how the proposed activities reflect the unique local conditions and context

of

the

Project

Area

and

will

improve

outcomes

for

Project

Area

residents.

(
300

words
)

(1.4)

5. Transformative Elements (scored) Applications are not required to address the entire list of TCC Transformative Elements but

must

address

Community

Engagement

and

Climate

Adaptation

and

Resilience
,

at

a

minimum.

Applications

will

be

evaluated

based

on

the

strength

and

integration

of

Transformative

Elements.

Transformative Elements: Prior Community Engagement 1. Provide a history of inclusive, culturally appropriate, and community-driven planning

efforts,

including

community

engagement

conducted

in

the

last

five

years

in

the

Project

Area

around

issues

related

to

climate

impacts

and

community

development.

Identify

partners,

organizations,

and

community

members

that

have

been

involved.

Describe

the

three

most

impactful

activities

you

facilitated

that

informed

the

TCC

proposal

development,

including

the

number

of

residents

who

participated.

(
300

words
)

(2.1)

2. What community priorities and corners surfaced from the engagement activities? (
200

words
)

(2.1)

3. How did you identify and prioritize activities for inclusion in the Project Development

Grant

application?

How

did

community

input

directly

inform

the

selection

of

the

project(s)

included

in

the

application?

(
200

words
)

(2.1)

Transformative Elements: Proposed Grant Activities Community Engagement 1. How will you use an inclusive process to meaningfully engage the community throughout

the

TCC

grant

term?

Describe

how

you

will

use

effective

and

meaningful

community

engagement

programs

and

practices

to

gather

the

input

and

expertise

of

community

members,

including

local

public

agencies,

community-based

organizations,

workforce

development

boards,

and

other

partners.

(
300

words
)

(2.2)

2. Discuss potential barriers to community participation faced by the Project Area’s residents

and

the

steps

you

will

take

to

remove

those

barriers

during

the

grant

term.

For

example,

choosing

accessible

meeting

times

and

locations

and

providing

translation,

accommodations,

stipends,

childcare,

etc.

(
200

words
)

(2.2)

Climate Adaptation and Resilience 1. Identify 2-3 top climate hazard exposures (such as wildfires, floods, sea level rise,

drought,

or

extreme

heat)

expected

to

impact

the

Project

Area

during

the

TCC

grant

term

and

over

the

next

25 years.

What

characteristics,

policies,

programs,

or

other

factors

would

make

a

community

more

able

to

respond

to,

prepare

for,

or

overcome

these

climate

impacts?

Note:

Please

cite

external

resources

or

figures

to

support

your

identified

issues.

Citations

will

not

be

included

in

the

character

count.

(
200

words
)

(2.2)

a. Upload: Provide screenshots or figures from resources that were used to identify

the

top

issues.

We

suggest

consulting

local

reports

and

documents

such

as

Local

Hazard

Mitigation

Plans

or

Climate

Adaptation
Plans to support the identification. The Vulnerable Communities Platform or Cal-Adapt may also be used to identify vulnerabilities and exposure to climate hazards. 2. Describe how these climate impacts will affect the most vulnerable community members

(those

more

sensitive

to

climate

change

and

have

fewer

resources

to

adapt

or

recover

from

climate

impacts).

Describe

how

the

climate

impacts

will

affect

the

built

environment.

(
300

words
)

(2.2)

3. Describe how your proposed activities provide climate adaptation and resilience benefits

to

the

community,

further

any

ongoing

efforts,

and

address

the

climate

impacts

you

identified

above.

(
300

words
)

(2.2)

Other Transformative Elements The Additional Transformative Elements are:
a. Displacement Avoidance : The proposed activities support development of policies

and

programs

to

prevent

displacement

of

current

residents

and

small

businesses.
o Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities: The proposed activities

identify

economic

development

needs

and

support

pathways

to

high-quality

jobs

in

the

Project

Area.
o Leverage Funding: The applicant’s proposed activities will assist in identifying

and

securing

potential

funding

sources

to

implement

their

work.

1. Describe how the proposed activities will further the applicant’s ability to meet one

or

more

of

the

additional

Transformative

Elements.

(
300

words
)

(2.2)

6. Project Design and Feasibility (scored) 1. Describe how the proposed activities address community needs. Describe the community

benefits

that

the

proposed

activities

will

provide.

(
300

words
)

(3.1)

2. Describe how the proposed activities were designed to include appropriate scope,

scale,

and

components

for

this

community.

(
200

words
)

(3.1)

3. Describe how the proposed activities advance health equity and racial equity in the

Project

Area.

(
300

words
)

(3.2)

4. Describe any strategies and/or contingencies in place to ensure the project is completed

within

the

time

frame

and

budget

proposed

in

the

work

plan

and

budget.

(
200

words
)

(3.3)

5. Describe how the proposed activities prepare the community to receive and implement

future

funding

opportunities.

(
300

words
)

(3.4)

Project Feasibility Details Site control Applicants must demonstrate site control for any infrastructure projects (site remediation,

pilot

projects,

water

supply

and

wastewater

infrastructure).

For

all

other

activities

that

will

lead

to

future

implementation,

applicants

must

describe

how

they

will

obtain

site

control

during

the

grant

term.

Activities

that

are

not

currently

tied

to

a

single

site

do

not

require

site

control

documentation.

Examples of proposed TCC Project Development activities that require site control

documentation:

● Implementation of water supply and wastewater infrastructure ● Implementing pilot or demonstration projects ● All activities related to site remediation Examples of proposed TCC Project Development activities that require a description

of

how

site

control

will

be

obtained

during

the

grant

term:

● Developing project designs or feasibility studies for future construction on a

specific

site

that

has

already

been

identified
● Financial planning related to a proposed project at a site that has already been

identified

Examples of proposed TCC Project Development activities that do NOT require site

control

documentation:

● Conducting community engagement to identify and prioritize possible sites for

future

construction

of

a

community

facility,

and

then

selecting

a

site

and

beginning

to

work

on

project

plans

and

designs

during

the

grant

term
● General feasibility studies not tied to a single site ● Community engagement not tied to a single site If you are in doubt, please explain your situation in the text box below and upload relevant

supporting

documentation.

You

can

also

reach

out

to

TCC

staff

at
[email protected].

1. Based on the information above, does your application have any tasks that may

require

site

control

at

the

time

of

application

and/or

during

the

grant

term?
ο Yes ♣ Rest of questions below will appear ο No ♣ If no, briefly explain why site control is not required for your application.

(
200

words)

Per Section 10.18 of the TCC Guidelines, “site control” means the Lead Applicant or

Co-Applicant

has

control

of

property

through

one

or

more

of

the

following:

1. Fee title 2. A leasehold or other interest in the property with provisions that enable the interest-holder

to

make

improvements

on

and

encumber

the

property

provided

that

the

terms

and

conditions

of

any

proposed

lease

shall

permit,

prior

to

grant

funding,

compliance

with

all

program

requirements

3. An option contract or legally-enforceable Letter of Commitment from the property

owner

to

sell

or

lease

the

property,

which

shall

extend

through

the

anticipated

date

of

the

Program

award

4. An executed disposition and development agreement, right of way, or irrevocable

offer

of

dedication

to

a

Public

Agency

5. An executed encroachment permit for construction of improvements or facilities

within

the

public

right

of

way

or

on

public

land

6. An executed agreement with a public agency that gives the applicant exclusive

rights

to

negotiate

with

the

agency

for

the

acquisition

of

the

site;

provided

that

the

major

terms

of

the

acquisition

have

been

agreed

to

by

all

parties

7. A land sales contract or enforceable agreement for acquisition of the property 8. Other forms of site control that give SGC assurance (equivalent to 1-7 above) that

the

applicant

will

be

able

to

complete

the

Project

in

a

timely

manner

and

in

accordance

with

all

the

requirements

of

the

TCC

Program

For all properties owned by the Lead or Co-Applicant, the Lead or Co-Applicant must

provide

a

letter

committing

the

property

to

its

proposed

use.

For

all

other

properties,

the

applicant

must

provide

documentation

demonstrating

site

control

through

one

of

the

methods

listed

above.

1. Describe the task that requires site control at the time of application . Please describe

the

parties

and

terms

of

the

arrangement

and

identify

which

option(s)

from

the

list

above

are

you

using

to

achieve

site

control.

(
300

words
)

2. Upload documentation of site control (such as a letter from the Lead or Co-Applicant

committing

the

property

to

its

proposed

use,

or

another

document

that

demonstrates

one

of

the

site

control

methods

listed

above)

3. Describe the tasks that require site control to be obtained during the grant term and

identify

which

activities

in

your

proposed

scope

will

allow

you

to

obtain

site

control

during

the

grant

term.

(300

words)

4. Do you have additional tasks that require site control at the time of application? ● No ● Yes ο Describe a task that require site control at the time of application .

Please

describe

the

parties

and

terms

of

the

arrangement

and

identify

which

option(s)

from

the

list

above

are

you

using

to

achieve

site

control.

(300

words)
ο Upload documentation of site control (such as a letter from the Lead or Co-Applicant

committing

the

property

to

its

proposed

use,

or

another

document that demonstrates one of the site control methods listed above)
♣ Do you have additional tasks that require site control at the time of

application?
● No ● Yes ο Describe a task that require site control at the time of

application.

Please

describe

the

parties

and

terms

of

the

arrangement

and

identify

which

option(s)

from

the

list

above

are

you

using

to

achieve

site

control.

(300

words)

ο Upload documentation of site control (such as a letter

from

the

Lead

or

Co-Applicant

committing

the

property

to

its

proposed

use,

or

another

document

that

demonstrates

one

of

the

site

control

methods

listed

above)

ο Do you have any other tasks that require site control

at

the

time

of

application?
♣ No ♣ Yes ● Describe all remaining tasks that require

site

control

at

the

time

of

application.

Describe

the

parties

and

terms

of

the

arrangement

and

identify

which

option(s)

from

the

list

above

you

are

using

to

achieve

site

control.

(900

words)
● Upload documentation of all
remaining

site

controls

(such

as

a

letter

from

the

Lead

or

Co-Applicant

committing

the

property

to

its

proposed

use,

or

another

document

that

demonstrates

one

of

the

site

control

methods

listed

above)

Important note: The remainder of the project feasibility questions are for applicants with tasks

involving

site

remediation,

pilot

projects,

or

water

supply

and

wastewater

infrastructure

activities

during

the

grant

term.

1. Do any of your tasks possibly involve site remediation, pilot projects, or water supply

and

wastewater

infrastructure

during

the

grant

term?

ο Yes ♣ Continue to answer the rest of the questions in this section ο No ♣ Move onto the next section, Capacity California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Before submitting an application, Lead Applicants and Co-Applicants should consult

with

the

public

agency

or

agencies

that

have

permitting

authority

over

the

projects

in

the

application

to

determine

what

is

required

to

comply

with

CEQA.

The Lead Applicant and/or Co-Applicants must demonstrate and provide documentation

showing

that

the

proposed

grant

activities

are

CEQA

compliant

and/or

report

on

the

project’s

CEQA

status.

Applicants

must

demonstrate

that

any

pending

environmental

review

necessary

to

complete

proposed

TCC

activities

will

be

completed

in

time

to

successfully

implement

the

proposed

TCC

activities,

and

no

later

than

the

end

of

the

first

year

of

the

grant

term.

1. Select all CEQA requirements and status options below which apply for any activities

included

in

your

application.

Note:

Answer

Narrative

questions

and

upload

relevant

documentation

for

all

applicable

activities

within

each

CEQA

status.

(3.3)
ο Option 1: Activities that are categorically exempt, statutorily exempt, or are

not

considered

projects

under

CEQA.
♣ Describe all projects’ CEQA requirements and exemption statuses.
♣ Upload the following documentation for projects that are categorically

exempt,

statutorily

exempt,

or

are

not

considered

projects

under

CEQA:
♣ A CEQA Notice of Exemption (NOE) that has been approved by the

appropriate

body

pursuant

to

their

obligations

under

CEQA,

OR

♣ Documentation that the project is CEQA compliant or does not require

CEQA,

including

but

not

limited

to:

● A resolution adopted by the legislative body (e.g., City Council,

Board

of

Supervisors)

confirming

a

project’s

exemption. If a resolution or similar mechanism is not available

or

does

not

exist,

meeting

minutes

documenting

the

legislative

body’s

consideration

and

approval

of

the

project’s

CEQA

compliance

may

be

submitted.

● A signed letter or similar document from the head administrator

of

the

approving

entity

(e.g.,

Planning

Director).
ο Option 2: Activities that are not categorically exempt or statutorily exempt

and

are

considered

projects

under

CEQA.
♣ Describe all projects’ CEQA requirements and statuses. ♣ Upload file-stamped Notice of Determinations for all projects considered

projects

under

CEQA.
ο Option 3: Activities that do not yet have the documentation required to meet

Option

1 or

Option

2. ♣ Describe all projects’ CEQA requirements and status for projects

without

required

documentation.

Include

a

description

of

any

conditions

of

approval

and

anticipated

timeline

to

obtain

approval.
♣ Upload any supporting documentation needed to demonstrate how

you

will

meet

CEQA

requirements

in

time

to

successfully

implement

your

project,

and

no

later

than

one

year

into

the

TCC

grant

term.
ο Option 4: Tribal applicants
Option 4: Tribal applicants
SGC, Tribal applicants, and Application Technical Assistance providers will determine

CEQA

requirements

on

a

project-by-project

basis

in

accordance

with

all

applicable

laws

and

regulations.

Tribal

applicants

should

check

all

applicable

boxes

for

CEQA

requirements

and

status,

to

answer

all

applicable

narrative

questions,

andsubmit

all

applicable

CEQA

documentation

as

described

above.

Tribal

applicants

can

use

the

box

below

to

provide

any

other

relevant

information.

If some or all proposed projects are within federally recognized Tribal boundaries,

please

note

that

in

the

box

below.

It

is

not

the

intention

of

SGC

to

impose

any

additional

requirements

on

Tribal

applicants

beyond

what

is

required

by

existing

laws

and

regulations.

Provide any other relevant information for activities, projects, and CEQA requirements.

Permits 1. Applicants must identify all permits required to implement the proposed grant activities

(such

as

construction

or

operation

permits)

and

the

timeline

for

obtaining

them.

Task # Name of permit When in the grant term will it be needed? (e.g., Month 6) Do you already have this permit?
How long does it take to obtain this type of permit and what is your plan for obtaining it?

2. Provide any other information or explanation below. If you are a self-permitting agency,

state

that

here.

If

you

have

not

entered

any

permits

above,

please

provide

an

explanation

of

why

no

permits

are

needed.

Operations and Maintenance Plan 1. Describe the long-term operations, maintenance, and ownership of all grant components

that

will

extend

beyond

the

TCC

grant

term.

This

includes

facilities,

vehicles,

urban

greening,

infrastructure,

transportation

improvements,

community

resilience

centers,

etc.

Identify

the

parties

responsible

for

ongoing

upkeep

and

monitoring,

including

the

funding

source.

(300

words)

By checking the below box, the Lead Applicants acknowledge responsibility for the

following:

1. Provide TCC a finalized version of the Operations and Maintenance Plan(s) above

as

a

deliverable

during

the

grant

term.

2. If the parties identified in the Operations and Maintenance Plan(s) above are unable

to

fulfill

their

duties

as

described,

I,

the

Lead

Applicant,

will

be

responsible

for

identifying,

securing,

and

coordinating

with

appropriate

responsible

parties

to

complete

the

long-term

operations

and

maintenance

of

the

project

for

its

entire

useful

life.
☐ I, the Lead Applicant, acknowledge responsibility for all listed duties tied to Operation

and

Maintenance

Plans

7. Capacity (scored) Each applicant must demonstrate their capacity to oversee, manage, and implement the proposed

grant

activities if

awarded. Collectively,

the

Lead

Applicant

and

Co-Applicants

must

possess

the

capacity

to

implement

the

proposed

grant

activities

in

compliance

with

all

program

requirements

throughout

the

term

of

the

grant.

Please complete

the questions

and

upload

the documents outlined

below as

requested.

Reference Guidelines section 10.8 Management Capacity for additional information.

California Native American Tribes or Tribally-owned nonprofits are exempt from submitting

management

capacity

information

that

violates

their

data

sovereignty.

A

Tribe

that

chooses

not

to

submit

the

management

capacity

documentation

described

in

the

TCC

Guidelines

must

adequately

demonstrate,

through

other

documentation,

that

they

have

sufficient

management

capacity

to

fulfill

their

proposed

role

in

the

TCC

grant.

Application

Technical

Assistance

providers

will

support

Tribal

applicants

in

identifying

and

submitting

alternative

forms

of

documentation.

SGC

will

determine

whether

the

submitted

documentation

sufficiently

meets

this

requirement

and

will

work

with

the

Tribe

to

identify

mutually

agreeable

documentation.

Tribal applicants who would like to submit alternative documentation management capacity should follow the instructions on requesting Tribal modifications. ● Lead Applicants or Co-Applicants who are California Native American Tribes and Tribally-owned

nonprofits

may

request

modifications

to

the

Capacity

requirement.

See

the

TCC

Guidelines

for

more

information.

Select

all

that

apply:
ο This does not apply to me/I am not requesting a modification ο I submitted a request to SGC and SGC approved it. ο I submitted a request to SGC and have no yet heard back ο I would like to request my frist modification(s) now ο I would to request additional modification(s) now ● If you selected “ I would like to request additional modification(s) now ,” respond to the

following

questions

in

the

text

box

below

or

in

an

attachment.

If

you

respond

in an attachment, write N/A. Requirement: Which requirement are you requesting to

modify?

If

applicable,

which

specific

portion(s)

of

the

requirement

are

you

requesting

to

modify?

Proposed

modification:

What

are

you

proposing

as

an

alternative?

Justification:

Why

is

this

modification

necessary?

How

will

the

alternative

fulfill

the

intent

of

the

original

requirement?
ο Upload your answers to the additional Tribal Modification questions here if necessary.

Management Capacity The Lead Applicant has primary responsibility for the management and implementation of

the

overall

TCC

activities.

Co-Applicants

are

responsible

for

implementing

certain

grant

components

under

the

guidance

of

the

Lead

Applicant.

The answers in this section of the application should be consistent with the proposed Collaborative

Governance

Structure

and

decision-making

processes

outlined

in

the

Collaborative

Governance

Agreement.

The

Collaborative

Governance

Structure

and
Collaborative Governance Agreement must meet the requirements outlined in Section 3.2: Collaborative Governance of the Round 6 TCC Program Guidelines.

Although the following questions are interrelated, please avoid providing duplicative information

about

the

Lead

Applicant

and

Co-Applicants

in

each

question.

1. Describe similar work the Lead Applicant has successfully completed in California

in

the

last

10 years.

(
300

words
)

(4.1)

(4.2)

2. Upload supporting documentation to demonstrate the Lead Applicant’s narrative above.

(4.1)

(4.2)

3. Check this box to affirm that your budget demonstrates the full- and/or part-time staff

dedicated

to

implementing

the

proposed

activities.

(4.1)

4. Provide the name, email, phone number, organization, and role of one reference who

can

speak

to

the

quality

and

timeliness

of

the

Lead

Applicant’s

work.

(4.1)

(4.2)

5. Why has this organization chosen to commit to its proposed role in the TCC grant?

Why

was

this

organization

chosen

as

the

most

appropriate

to

serve

as

Lead

Applicant?

(
200

words
)

6. Describe the organization’s capacity to ensure grant activities are completed on time

and

within

budget.

(
200

words
)
Organizational Charts 1. Identify a current employee who will be primarily responsible for carrying out the proposed

TCC

activities

and

acting

as

the

primary

point

of

contact

for

SGC,

including

their

name,

title,

and

division

or

department.

If

this

responsibility

will

eventually be transferred to a new employee who will be hired with TCC funds, also

state

that

person’s

title,

division

or

department,

who

in

the

organization

they

will

report

to,

and

what

percentage

of

their

time

will

be

spent

on

TCC.(4.1)

2. Describe all current and/or proposed full and part-time staff that will be working on

the

TCC

activities.

For

each

staff

person,

include:
a. Title and division or department b. Role in implementing TCC c. Percentage of their time that will be spent on TCC d. Employment status – full time, part time, intern, volunteer, fellow, etc. i. Describe all current/proposed TCC staff below.

Project Management Approach The Lead Applicant must manage and monitor the proposed TCC grant activities and Co-Applicants.

For

successful

project

management,

the

Lead

Applicant

must

do

the

following

tasks:

● Use project management and coordination strategies to ensure that the project is completed

in

alignment

with

the

work

plan

and

budget
● Ensure all deliverables are completed successfully ● Coordinate staff and Co-Applicants to ensure the timely reimbursement of funds ● Ensure all Co-Applicants comply with program requirements ● Manage reporting and evaluation as required by the TCC Program

1. Describe your project management approach ( 300 words ) (4.1,4.2) Financial Capacity Lead Applicants must demonstrate their capacity to oversee, manage, and implement the

proposed

grant

activities

if

awarded.

The

Lead

Applicant's

financial

and

management

capacity

will

be

evaluated

to

assess

whether

their

basic

financial

infrastructure,

systems,

and

cash

flow

can

support

Co-Applicants

through

the
reimbursement model and optional advance pay model. Reference Section 10.7 Financial Capacity and 10.8 Management Capacity for additional information.

California Native American Tribes or Tribally-owned nonprofits are exempt from submitting

financial

or

management

capacity

information

that

violates

their

data

sovereignty.

A

Tribe

that

chooses

not

to

submit

the

financial

or

management

documentation

described

in

the

TCC

Guidelines

must

adequately

demonstrate,

through

other

documentation,

that

they

have

sufficient

management

and

financial

capacity

to

fulfill

their

proposed

role

in

the

TCC

grant.

Application

Technical

Assistance

providers

will support Tribal applicants in identifying and submitting alternative forms of documentation.

SGC

will

determine

whether

the

submitted

documentation

sufficiently

meets

this

requirement

and

will

work

with

the

Tribe

to

identify

mutually

agreeable

documentation.

Tribal applicants who would like to submit alternative documentation for management and/or financial capacity should follow the instructions on requesting Tribal modifications.

Please describe how the Lead Applicant plans to ensure appropriate financial capacity to

execute

the

Grant

Agreement,

meet

procurement

requirements,

execute

contracts

(as

applicable),

receive

and

manage

public

funding,

and

adhere

to

the

Program’s

reimbursement

process.

In

your

response,

please

include

the

following

information:

● Financial Management: Describe the organization’s financial management policies

and

procedures,

with

specific

attention

to

accounting

measures

in

place

for

the

management

of

restricted

public

funding.

In

your

response,

please

note

whether

you

have

written

policies

and

procedures

in

place.

● Managing Public Grant Funds: Describe any specific State and/or Federal financial

management

and

accounting

requirements

the

organization

must

adhere

to

for

other

sources

of

public

grant

funding.

In

your

response,

please

note

the

source(s)

of

public

grant

funding

you

currently

manage

or

have

managed

within

the

past

5 years.
● Procurement: Does the organization follow a written procurement policy? If so, summarize

the

organization’s

procurement

policy.

● Contract Management: Describe the organization’s approach to the management of

contracts

for

vendors,

including

disbursement

of

payment

to

vendors

and

Collaborative

Governance

Structure

(CGS)

Partners

which

will

be

funded

by

the

TCC

grant.

1. Please provide your response below. ( 400 words ) (4.1)

2. Has the Lead Applicant received and managed restricted public funding of a similar

volume

as

requested

for

the

proposed

TCC

Project

in

the

past

5 years?
a. Yes b. No 3. When managing public funds, how does the organization minimize (or plan to minimize)

the

risk

of

fraud,

waste,

and

abuse?

In

your

response,

please

note

what

written

policies

and

procedures

you

have

in

place.

(
200

words
)

To demonstrate financial capacity, TCC requires all of the following financial documentation

for

the

Lead

Applicant:

● Financial Statements and/or Audits (last three years): Provide copies of certified financial

statements

and/or

audits

for

the

organization

for

the

past

three

fiscal

years

–

prepared

by

an

independent

auditor

or

certified

public

accountant.

The

three

required

financial

statements

are

described

below.

If

you

have

audits

that

contain

all

of

the

required

information,

you

can

submit

those

instead.

● Organizational Budget: Provide the current fiscal year’s annual organizational budget

–

including

any

other

funding

sources

or

revenue

streams

that

exist

for

the

organization.

● Non-Profit Documentation: If the Lead Applicant is a non-profit organization, please

provide

copies

of

the

most

recent

Federal

Form

990

(Form

990,

990-WZ,

990-N,

or

990-PF

as

appropriate)

and

IRS

501(c)(3)

Tax

Determination

Letter,
.
● Audit Findings (last five years): Any Applicant that has had an audit finding in the last

five

years

is

required

to

submit

Independent

Auditor’s

Report

detailing

the

finding(s),

and

the

organization’s

written

response

to

the

Auditor’s

report

including

the

plan

to

resolve

the

audit

finding(s).

If

you

do

not

have

audit

findings

for

one

or

more

of

the

last

five

years

,
upload

an

explanation

of

why

below.
● Upload all required financial capacity documentation. (4.1) In addition, TCC requires all of the following financial Statements: ● Balance Sheet (Statement of Financial Position) The

balance

sheet

provides

a

snapshot

of

a

company’s assets,

liabilities,

and

equity at

a

specific

point

in

time.

● Income Statement (Statement of Profit and Loss) This

statement

summarizes

the

company’s revenues,

expenses,

and

profits

or

losses over

a

reporting

period.

● Cash Flow Statement
The

cash

flow

statement

details

the movement

of

cash into

and

out

of

the

company,

categorized

into operating,

investing,

and

financing

activities.

1. Upload Lead Applicant financial statements (last three years) below:

2. Upload Lead Applicant’s organization budget for the current year. 3. Is Lead Applicant a non-profit organization? ο Yes ♣ Upload most recent Federal Form 990 (Form 990, 990-WZ, 990-N, or

990-PF

as

appropriate).
♣ Upload most recent IRS 501(c)(3) Tax Determination Letter: ο No 4. Did you have any audit findings in the last 5 years? ο Yes ♣ Please upload Lead Applicant audit findings Independent Auditor’s Report

and

the

organization’s

written

response

to

the

Auditor’s

report

(last

five

years):
ο No ♣ If you are missing audit findings for one or more of the last five years,

explain

why:

(
200

words
)

8. Collaborative Governance Structure (scored) Tribal modifications Lead Applicants or Co-Applicants who are California Native American Tribes and Tribally-owned

nonprofits

may

request

modifications

to

may

request

modifications

to

one

or

more

requirements

of

the

Collaborative

Governance

Structure

and/or

Collaborative

Governance

Agreement.

See

the

TCC

Guidelines

for

more

information.

Select

all

that

apply:

● This does not apply to me/I am not requesting a modification. ● I submitted a request to SGC and SGC approved it. ● I submitted a request to SGC and have not yet heard back. ● I would like to request my first modification(s) now. ● I would like to request additional modification(s) now.

If you selected “I would like to request additional modification(s) now,” respond to the following

questions

in

the

text

box

below

or

in

an

attachment.

If

you

respond

in

an

attachment,

write

N/A.

Requirement:

Which

requirement

are

you

requesting

to

modify?

If

applicable,

which

specific

portion(s)

of

the

requirement

are

you

requesting

to

modify?

Proposed

modification:

What

are

you

proposing

as

an

alternative?

Justification:

Why

is

this

modification

necessary?

How

will

the

alternative

fulfill

the

intent

of

the

original

requirement?

● Upload your answers to the additional Tribal modification questions here if necessary.

Questions

1. Describe the process used to develop the Collaborative Governance Structure.

Include

a

description

of

how

members

were

selected

and

how

members

are

composed

of

a

diverse

representation

of

resident

voices,

local

leadership,

and

key

partners

(provide

a

justification

if

no

residents

or

community-nominated

members

are

included).

(
500

words
)

2. Describe the Lead Applicant’s and Co-Applicants’ experience working in TCC related

fields.

List

each

Applicant

and

Co-Applicant

and

describe

each

one’s:

(100

words

for

the

Lead

Applicant

and

each

Co-Applicant)

(4.2)
a. Work history; b. Sustained community engagement around climate change; and/or c. Experience working with one or more of the following areas: d. disadvantaged communities e. Tribal communities f. housing and community development g. economic development h. environmental i. public health issues i. Enter your answer to the above question 3. Upload: Upload a Collaborative Governance Agreement worksheet or Collaborative

Governance

for

Tribes

worksheet

signed

by

all

Lead-

and

Co-Applicants

(if

applicable)

and

meets

all

requirements

in
Section 3.2.

Worksheet

clearly

outlines

transparent,

accountable,

inclusive,

and

community-centered

methods

of

governance

and

decision-making.

(4.4)

4. If the project area crosses multiple jurisdictions, are all relevant jurisdictions represented

within

the

proposed

Collaborative

Governance

Structure?

a. Yes, the project area crosses multiple jurisdictions and all relevant jurisdictions

are

represented.
b. No, the project area crosses multiple jurisdictions and not all relevant jurisdictions

are

represented.
i. Upload: Upload a Letter of Support from the relevant public agency for

the

jurisdiction(s)

within

the

Project

Area

but

not

included

in

the

Collaborative

Governance

Structure.
c. The project area does not cross multiple jurisdictions.

Transformative Climate Communities Round 6
TCC Project Development Grant Application Checklist
Program Resource Links
● Round 6 Application Webpage
● Round 6 Guidelines
● Round 6 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)
● Submittable Application Link
● Pre-Proposal
● Technical Assistance Request Form
This document aims to serve as an optional resource to assist applicants in their Grant Application work for TCC Round 6. This document is a summary of the requirements and components. This document will not be submitted as a part of the application package and should not be used as the basis to begin an application.

In the event of any discrepancies between this document and official Grant Application materials (Guidelines, Notice of Funding Availability, or Application itself), the official materials’ information should be followed.

For additional information about any application component, please refer to the appropriate referenced section of the Round 6 Guidelines, and the application itself.

Project Development Grant Program Thresholds Requirements An applicant must demonstrate that they meet all TCC Program Thresholds. If an applicant is unable to meet the Program Thresholds, their application will not move on to full review and will not be considered for award.

General Completeness
□ The application is complete and provides enough information to assess feasibility of the proposed grant activities and compliance with the TCC Program and Application Requirements
□ Application documents are properly labeled, stored in the proper file structure, and are easily accessible
□ Work plan adheres to the two-year grant term and contains sufficient detail □ Budget contains sufficient detail and is accompanied by all necessary supporting documentation

Applicant Eligibility
□ Lead Applicant is an eligible organization type (See Section 3.1) □ Application contains at least two Co-Applicants □ Co-Applicants are all eligible organizations □ Lead Applicant or Co-Applicant is an appropriate public agency as described in Section 3.1. The public agency has provided the necessary authorization for the application Capacity □ Lead Applicant has submitted financial capacity documentation as described in Section 10.7. Lead Applicant has basic financial infrastructure, systems, and cash flow to manage state funds, including supporting Co-Applicants through the reimbursement

model

or

the

optional

advance

pay

model.

The

Lead

Applicant

has

no

unresolved

audit

findings

in

the

last

five

years.

If

nonprofit,

Lead

Applicant

has

proper

501(c)(3)

documentation.
□ Lead Applicant has submitted management capacity documentation as described in Section 10.8 Collaborative Governance Structure □ Signed Collaborative Governance Agreement worksheet for the Collaborative Governance

Structure

or

signed

Collaborative

Governance

for

Tribes

worksheet
meets all requirements as described in Section 3.2 □ Applicants with a Project Area that overlaps multiple jurisdictions have submitted a

Collaborative

Governance

Agreement

worksheet

that

meets

all

requirements
described in Section 3.2 Project Area Eligibility
□ Project Area meets all requirements as described in Section 3.3 □ Applicant has submitted a Project Area Map in the form of a PDF map, a boundary

file,

and

any

supporting

documentation

(if

unincorporated

community)
Priority Policies
□ Local Planning Consistency Letter: Applicant has submitted a letter(s) signed by the

local

jurisdiction’s

Planning

and

Public

Works

Departments

verifying

that

the

application

is

consistent

with

land

use

designations,

building

intensity,

density,

applicable

goals,

policies

and

programs,

climate

adaptation

plans,

and

growth

and

conservation

planning

elements

Application Components Checklist The following lists documentation and components of a completed Project Development Grant ◻ Optional Tribal modification requests (if applicable) (See Section 2.5 and Tribal Modifications Instructions) o Early application component – due July 31, 2026, if requesting pre-approval
◻ Optional local data submission for disadvantaged unincorporated communities (if applicable) (See Section 3.3 and Local Data Instructions) o Early application component – due July 31, 2026, if requesting pre-approval

of

the

submission

◻ Optional Other Climate Innovation proposals for pre-approval, if applicable. (See Appendix B, Strategy 13) o Early application component – due June 15, 2026 ◻ Applicant eligibility: o A signed Letter of Commitment from the Lead Applicant and each Co-Applicant

▪ Note: For Project Development Grants and Implementation Grants, Letters

of

Commitment

are

not

needed

from

the

Lead

Applicant

or

Co-Applicants

if

they

have

signed

the

Collaborative

Governance

Agreement

worksheet.

o If Lead Applicant is a public agency : a passed formal resolution authorizing the

agency

to

apply,

accept,

and

execute

documents

if

awarded,

or
o If Lead Applicant is a California Native American Tribe : a letter from a Tribal Chairperson

to

the

same

effect

as

a

resolution.

▪ If the application is chosen for award, a passed formal resolution will

be

required

before

the

grant

can

be

executed.
▪ If Lead Applicant is a Tribally-owned non-profit and the Project Area contains

federally

recognized

tribal

boundaries,

and

the

relevant

Tribe(s)

is

not

a

Lead

or

Co-Applicant,

the

Tribe(s)

must

provide

a

Letter

of

Support.
◻ Narrative application questions about: o The community-informed vision for transformation o How the grant activities will address TCC Program Objectives, Transformative Elements,

and

TCC

Policy

Priorities
o The Project Area, community assets, and community priorities o Climate hazard exposures to the Project Area, as well as adaptation and resilience

measures
o Financial and organizational management capacity o Prior community engagement efforts, if any ◻ If including water supply or wastewater infrastructure projects or pilot projects, require

narrative

descriptions

of:

o Status of CEQA, site control, permits, operations and maintenance plan, project designs, and other requirements to implement the projects, and o Current access or plan for access to water supply and wastewater infrastructure
◻ Descriptive work plans with clear timelines, discrete tasks, and deliverables ◻ Budgets broken down by task that addresses the following:
o Accounts for additional staff to be hired, employee benefits and salary adjustments, and professional development opportunities within the grant term
o Contingency (optional for Project Development Grants) o Indirect costs up to 15%
▪ See Section 8.1 for additional flexibility details for California Native American Tribes and Tribally-owned nonprofits.

← All documents from this meeting