San Bruno City Council
June 28, 2022

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 437 of 478

15. Avigation easement to be granted to the City and County of San Francisco as operator of SFO. The avigation easement to be used in fulfilling this condition is provided in Appendix G of the SFO ALUCP.

16. If HVAC units are proposed, a supplemental noise analysis shall be performed documenting that the units comply with Chapter 6.16 of the Municipal Code prior to issuance of building permits.

17. A comprehensive landscape, planting and irrigation plan for all of the common areas, and, if applicable, individual lots shall be submitted for review by the Community and Economic Development Department prior to recordation of the final map. Plans shall comply with state and local Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO) requirements and include water use calculations. In addition, the plans shall be prepared with the following considerations:
• Landscape architect to select planting palette that is appropriate for both a biotreatment facility and being submerged for an extended period as ponding depth can exceed 12 inches during larger storm events.
• Efficient irrigation systems shall be used throughout all landscaped areas in accordance with the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

18. All mitigation measures in the adopted MMRP shall be included in improvement plan and building permit plans. All mitigation measures in the MMRP shall be applied as conditions of approval.

Building

19. Building permit applications/building plans will have to be designed to the current version of the California Building Codes adopted by the city.

20. To attenuate noise adjacent to San Bruno Avenue, the project applicant shall construct a sound wall 6-feet in height at the property line adjacent to San Bruno Avenue.

21. Due to noise levels from San Bruno Avenue, mechanical ventilation shall be shown in building permit plans and installed in all residential uses to allow residents to keep doors and windows closed, as desired for acoustical isolation.

22. Geotechnical report is dated February 2020. An updated geotechnical letter stating that site conditions have not changed shall be provided for the building permitting process.

23. Please imprint, on the submitted plans, the Construction Best Management Practices.

To access the standard plan, please visit: http://www.flowstobay.org/construction.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 438 of 478

24. Please note on plan: The City of San Bruno Municipal Code Section 6.16.070 the operation of any equipment or performance of any outside construction related to a project shall not exceed the noise level and time indicated below:

Monday through Saturday:
• 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM – 85 Decibels
• 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM – 60 Decibels
Sunday:
• 10:00 AM to 7:00 PM – 85 Decibels
• 7:00 PM to 10:00 AM – 60 Decibels

25. Approval of this Project does not relieve the Applicant from the applicable requirements of subsequent permits and approvals, including but not limited to the following as may be applicable:
a. Grading Permit and Improvement Plan
b. Fire Permit
c. School District Development Impact fee requirements

26. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall submit a Construction and Demolition Application to the Building and Safety Division. The link to access application:
https://www.sanbruno.ca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=32797 Public Works

27. If there is any conflict between the entitlement documents and the conditions of approval, these conditions of approval shall govern, unless approved by the City Engineer.

28. The Developer shall submit a Final Map prepared by a qualified Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and all local ordinances. The applicant shall provide current title report within six months of the final map submittal.

29. The Final Map must be prepared pursuant to the City of San Bruno Municipal Code, State Law and Regulations, and Standard Engineering Practice.

30. The Developer shall pay for and construct all improvements to private land and implement any conditions or mitigation measures associated with the Development.

31. The Developer shall be responsible for the cost of all City reviews and inspections required for all improvements associated with the Development.

32. The Devloper shall submit funds to the City in sufficient amounts to increase the deposit amount for the Public Works Department to at least $25,000 prior to any postentitlement meetings, reviews, and other work related to the project. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining said deposit account and shall submit funds to increase DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 439 of 478
the deposit amount to at least $25,000 or as determined by the City Engineer within fifteen calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City that the deposit amount is $15,000 or less. Actual costs for staff and consultant time shall be deducted from this deposit. At the end of the project, any remaining deposit amount will be refunded.

33. All improvements shall conform to City Standard Details and Standard Specifications, the San Bruno Municipal Code, and these Conditions of Approval unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. All improvements to be owned and operated by the City shall conform to City Standard Details and Standard Specifications, City of San Bruno Municipal Code, and these Conditions of Approval. City Standards shall govern in the event of a conflict.

34. The City reserves the right to require the Developer to provide easements for public utilities and access as determined by the City Engineer.

35. The Developer shall acquire at its own cost all off-site easements, rights-of-way, and land required for the development.

36. The Developer shall dedicate on all pertinent maps any and all public easements required for public utilities and access on private lots or parcels. All proposed utility easements, any City required non-access strips, and all other easements in general shall also be shown on any pertinent maps.

37. Developer shall convey any easements to its successors, with the stipulation that they shall be perpetually the owner’s responsibility for maintenance and repair, and the owners will hold and save the City of San Bruno harmless from all claims of any kind related to them.

38. Developer shall schedule a meeting to submit the Improvement Plans for a site development review with the Public Works Department.

39. The Developer shall create a Homeowners Association (HOA) for the Single Family Residential subdivision which will be responsible to maintain and repair, at their own cost, all privately owned and maintained facilities including but not limited to the proposed landscaping and irrigation systems, street lighting systems, the open space areas, the park and barbeque areas and furniture, private utility lines such as storm and sanitary sewer, street pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, shared driveways, stormwater treatment measures and ground slopes. The respective responsibilities shall be described and assigned in the CC&R’s.

40. CC&R’s shall be prepared and recorded with the Final Map.

Agreements

41. Prior to issuance of the City building permit, Developer shall enter into an Improvement Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to guarantee completion of DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 440 of 478
construction and payment of all public and private infrastructure improvements required of the project and to provide payment of all City inspection and plan check charges associated with the installation of public and private improvements. In addition, Developer shall provide the City with all bonds required by the San Bruno Municipal Code, in form approved by the City Attorney. The Improvement Agreement shall be recorded against the property along with the Final Map.

42. Prior to the issuance of a City building permit, Developer shall execute a Maintenance Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to ensure long-term maintenance and servicing by the Homeowner’s Association of the privately owned improvements.

These obligations shall be incorporated into the CC&R’s for the HOA. The Maintenance Agreements shall be recorded against the properties and be binding upon successors.

Maintenance responsibilities shall include, but not be limited to, landscaping and irrigation systems, street lighting systems, the open space areas, private utility lines such as storm and sanitary sewer, street pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, shared driveways, stormwater treatment measures and ground slopes. All public utilities shall be maintained by the City.

43. Prior to the issuance of a City building permit, Developer shall execute a Stormwater Treatment Measures Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to ensure long-term maintenance and servicing by the Homeowner’s Association for the stormwater site design and treatment control measures according to an approved Maintenance Plan(s). The Stormwater Treatment Measures Agreements shall be incorporated into the CC&R’s for the HOA, shall be recorded against the properties and be binding upon successors. A Maintenance Plan for every stormwater treatment control measure or applicable site design measure, inclusive of maintenance and inspection checklists and Maintenance Inspection Report Forms, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. A copy of the final, approved Maintenance Plan(s) shall be placed on file with the City’s Engineering Division.

Utilities

44. The Developer shall serve the development with City utilities, including City of San Bruno CityNet service.

45. Storm drainage improvements within the development shall be privately owned and maintained. Maintenance responsibility shall terminate at the connections to the public storm drain system.

46. Sanitary sewer improvements within the development shall be privately owned and maintained. Maintenance responsibility shall terminate at the connections to the public sanitary sewer system.

47. The street light system shall be privately owned and maintained.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 441 of 478

48. The water system shall be publicly owned and maintained and located within public right of way or a public easement.

49. San Bruno Water Division will operate and maintain water system facilities up to the water meters.

50. Developer shall pay for and construct the off-site water facilities necessary to serve the development as included in the modeling study report dated August 30, 2016, as determined necessary by the City Engineer. These improvements would include but are not limited to: (1) connect the inactive 12-inch diameter water main to Pressure Zone 10 located at San Bruno Avenue and Sneath Lane, with point of connection for the new 12” water main to San Bruno Avenue located on the east side of the San Bruno Avenue / Glenview Drive intersection, which combined requires approximately 165 feet of additional 12-inch diameter pipeline, (2) abandon the existing 10-inch diameter water main connected at San Bruno Avenue and Sneath Lane once the 12-inch diameter water main is connected to Pressure Zone 10, and (3) Install a pressure regulating station with a backflow preventer at the Project’s water service connection and an automatic blow-off valve connected to the City’s sanitary sewer system.

Plans

51. The final map for the proposed subdivision shall substantially conform to the tentative map approved by the Planning Commission, except as modified by the Conditions of Approval. Any further modification to the approved map shall require prior approval from the Community Development Director.

52. Any map and plans must be prepared to standard engineering practice and the City of San Bruno Municipal Code (Muni Code). In the event of conflict, the Muni Code shall govern unless approved by the City Engineer.

53. All Improvement Plans shall be submitted on 22”x34” standard plan sheets. Scale shall be sufficiently large for clarity and review. Street Improvement Plans and Profiles shall have a minimum of 1”=20’ scale. The Site Plan and Grading Plans shall have a minimum scale of 1”=40’. Applicant shall submit an AutoCAD version of the final improvement plan to the City. AutoCAD files shall include vertical and horizontal data that is compatible with and can be exported to ArcGIS.

54. The Developer shall submit engineered Improvement Plans for on-site and public improvements (including specifications & engineers cost estimates) for approval by the City Engineer. The Improvement Plans shall include, but are not limited to, all engineering calculations necessary to substantiate the design, proposed roadways, drainage improvements, utilities including CityNet Service, traffic control devices, retaining walls, waterlines, sanitary sewers, and storm drains, stormwater treatment facilities, street lighting, common area landscaping, signing and striping, and any other project improvements. Developer shall submit separate plan sets for onsite and public improvements upon request of the City. Coordination with other agencies for approval DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 442 of 478
of improvements and issuing permits, when needed, is the responsibility of developer’s engineering team.

55. Prior to and as part of utility design, the Developer shall pothole and submit pothole data for any utility crossings and for confirmation of utility separation as part of the utility plan review process. Developer assumes all risks for any utility work done without potholing. Separate encroachment permit(s) may be required for potholing within City and/or Caltrans right-of-way.

56. All major city utilities (valve clusters, meter assemblies, back flow assemblies and manholes) are to be drawn to scale showing the relationship with any adjacent structures, utilities and easements/property lines.

57. The Developer shall provide, as part of its Improvement Plans submittal and/or building plan submittal, detailed structural calculations and design details for retaining walls.

Walls shall incorporate drainage features, if necessary, as recommended in the geotechnical report to ensure proper drainage. The aesthetic design shall be to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The structural and drainage design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Building Official.

58. The Improvement Plans shall include complete electrical plans as separate sheets, showing the proposed streetlight system in the public right-of-way. Information in the lighting plan shall include, but is not limited to, the following: pole type(s), luminaire type(s), conductor and wiring schedule, points of connection, lamp wattage, pull box locations, load and intensity calculation.

59. The Developer shall provide photometric plans, which shall comply with standards shown on ANSI/IES RP-8-18 or latest edition of American National Standard Practice for Design and Maintenance of Roadway and Parking Facility Lighting. City standard Leotek GreenCobra Jr. LED street lights shall be used unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

Prior to Permit Issuance

60. The Developer shall apply for and obtain a City Grading Permit.

61. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall file a Notice of Intent and obtain coverage under the California State Department of Water Resources General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit, including preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the filing and a copy of the SWPPP shall be submitted to the City Engineer.

62. Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the Developer shall provide to the City Engineer a plan indicating the amount of soil to be removed, disposal sites, the estimated number of truck trips required and the proposed haul routes. The applicant shall pay the City Transportation Permit Fees before the grading permit is DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 443 of 478
issued. Said fees are for City time spent to process and issue transportation permit(s) for vehicles exceeding the maximum size and/or weight allowed by the California Vehicle Code

63. The Developer shall submit a detailed construction and staging plan that shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to building permit issuance.

64. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall submit fire sprinkler flushing plans that comply with NPDES stormwater treatment requirements.

65. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, Developer shall submit two copies of the approved and recorded CC&R’s to the City Engineer and the Community and Economic Development Director.

66. Developer shall pay for all current, on-site service connection fees (including but not limited to Water and Wastewater) and post all applicable deposits or bonds for infrastructure improvements to be dedicated to the City prior to building permit issuance. Fees shall be determined based on the current fee schedule at the time of permit issuance. Separate application is needed for water service request.

67. Developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from Public Works Department prior to commencing any work within the City’s public right-of-way or easements, including the placement of traffic control measures. The Encroachment Permit shall be issued prior to issuance of a building permit.

Improvement Plans

68. Elevation Datum to be based on a City bench mark.

69. Developer shall implement the recommendations of the geotechnical report as prepared by a registered Geotechnical Engineer. The Geotechnical Engineer who prepared the geotechnical report shall review all improvement plans prior to submittal of plans to the City and conduct any inspections, testing and other actions during construction that are called for in the geotechnical report.

Traffic/Street

70. The Developer shall, at their own cost, implement recommendation of the traffic impact analysis study dated April 7, 2017 to install all way stop control at the intersection of San Bruno Avenue and Glenview Drive. Other improvements to be installed include LED enhanced stop signs, advance stop warning signs, and high visibility crosswalk striping.

71. All streets, curb, gutter, sidewalk and shared driveways within the property shall be privately owned and maintained. Private street pavements shall be constructed to minimum structural standards for local residential streets.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 444 of 478

72. All pedestrian facilities shall be designed in accordance with Title 24 (Handicap Access) and the Americans with Disabilities Act, including pedestrian ramps at all curb returns or round corners, where applicable.

73. Traffic control, regulatory, warning, guide signs and markings (including fire hydrant pavement markers) shall be installed in conformance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

74. All curb ramps shall be installed to comply with ADA requirements. Applicant shall upgrade all curb ramps serving crossings that connect to the project frontage and provide a separate ramp for each crossing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

75. All new curb ramps shall be directional unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

Drainage

76. All manholes covers in the private storm drain system shall be neatly marked “Private S.D.”

77. Developer shall pay for and construct the off-site storm water facilities necessary to serve the development as shown on the Vesting Tentative Tract Map and as determined necessary by the City Engineer. These improvements would include but are not limited to approximately 350 linear feet of 15-inch RCP along San Bruno Avenue.

78. Implement trash capture devices within the development to reduce trash loads by 100 percent prior to discharging stormwater into the public storm drain system.

Install trash capture devices in all storm drain inlets around the exterior frontages.

Device details shall be approved by the City Engineer. All on-site trash capture devices shall be cleaned routinely and maintained by the Property Owner per the Stormwater Treatment Measures Maintenance Agreement.

79. All storm drain inlets shall be clearly marked with the words “No Dumping! Flows to Bay,” or equivalent using thermoplastic material or a plaque.

80. The Developer shall provide a final Drainage Report with the submission of the Improvement Plans. Reduce stormwater discharge to the City's public storm drain system to the maximum extent feasible. Strategies that can be incorporated include increasing pervious areas, such as utilizing permeable paving in the driveways, private street, and other walkways within the development.

81. The Developer shall provide final C.3 & C.6 checklists and Stormwater Management Plan with the submission of the Improvement Plans. Project shall comply with all requirements of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit Provision C.3.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 445 of 478
Please refer to the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program’s (SWCWPPP) C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance Manual for assistance in implementing Low Impact Development (LID) measures at the site.

Water

82. Water lines to be designed and constructed in accordance with Division of Drinking Water requirements and City standards and specifications.

83. Provide entire pressure regulating station as required per the hydraulic evaluation memorandum dated August 30, 2016. Installed pressure regulating station to be similar to other City facilities of this type and would include an underground vault containing the pressure regulating valve, control valves, pressure gauges, line strainers, blowdown valves, access ladder, sump pump, relief piping, SCADA unit and other needed appurtenances. Pressure regulating station to be located in public utility easement behind sidewalk.

Sanitary Sewer

84. All manholes covers in the private sanitary sewer system shall be neatly marked “Private S.S.”
Grading

85. Grading plans shall include appropriate erosion control measures for the development.

86. The erosion control plan sheets shall be included as separate, numbered sheets in the grading plan of the improvement plans.

87. Engineered retaining walls over 3 feet in height shall be constructed of approved durable material, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, Community and Economic Development Director, and Building Official.

88. The grading plans shall minimize the need for off haul from the Project Site. Design shall incorporate all elements of the applicable soils report(s). The grading plans shall be signed off by the Geotechnical Engineer indicating that plans are in compliance with the geotechnical report.

89. Do not grade onto adjoining property without prior written permission from the property owner.

Utilities
DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 446 of 478

90. Joint trenches shall include telephone, CityNet Services (City of San Bruno Cable TV), electrical, communication, and gas lines. The trench width and depth shall be to the standards of the utility companies and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

91. The Developer shall provide evidence that all affected utility companies including, but not limited to, Pacific Gas and Electric, CityNet Services and Telephone have reviewed and approved the proposed joint trench improvements.

92. The Developer shall provide evidence that Pacific Gas and Electric has reviewed and approved the 12” water line crossing/separation from their existing gas lines.

Construction Process

93. Prior to the start of construction, the Developer shall hold a preconstruction conference with City staff. Attendance shall include the construction managers, contractors, and all subcontractors who are responsible for installing infrastructure improvements, and grading and erosion control measures.

94. Developer shall provide the name and 24-hour emergency phone number of the contact person in charge of construction.

95. During construction, only San Bruno Water Division personnel will be allowed to operate existing water facilities including water valves to facilitate any shut-downs required for construction.

96. Developer shall perform two pavement condition surveys to determine the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) on College Drive prior to the start of construction and after construction is complete. The surveys shall be performed by professional pavement inspectors conducting detailed examinations of pavement surface features such as cracking and depressions in accordance with the requirements of ASTM D6433-11, “Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys.” Copies of both survey results shall be provided to the City. The limits of the survey and any repairs shall be the project frontages plus 500’ beyond the property in the direction of construction traffic. The Developer shall make any repairs to the roadway necessary to attain the pre-construction PCI to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

97. San Bruno Avenue Westbound between Glenview Drive and Crestmoor Drive shall receive a pavement treatment consisting of a 2” cold plane followed by a 2” asphalt concrete overlay. The Developer proposes to install a storm drain main between these limits and this street section was recently paved and is under pavement moratorium.

98. Developer shall coordinate the installation of stormwater treatment measures with the City and shall arrange to have a City Inspector or City-designated third party DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 447 of 478
inspector inspect the installation. Developer shall be responsible for all fees associated with third party stormwater inspections during construction.

99. All construction related parking shall be located onsite (including commercial vehicles and construction workers’ personal automobiles). 100. Developer shall submit an Encroachment Permit for any traffic control measures on the public right of way during construction. The Developer shall post a lighted message board sign with wording to the satisfaction of the City Engineer indicating the dates and times traffic control will be in effect.
101. Upon completion of construction, the Developer shall repair any public improvements damaged by construction operations to the conditions existing prior to project construction and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 102. The Developer shall submit a dust control plan consistent with Bay Area Air Quality Monitoring District (BAAQMD) requirements for approval by the Department of Public Works. To reduce dust levels, exposed earth surfaces shall be watered as necessary. The application of water shall be monitored to prevent runoff into the storm drain system. Spillage resulting from hauling operations along or across any public or private property shall be removed immediately. Dust nuisances originating from the contractor’s operations, either inside or outside of the right-of-way shall be controlled. The measures shall also include:
a) Water all active construction sites at least twice daily. b) Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard.
c) Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites.
d) Sweep daily (with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites.
e) Sweep streets daily (with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets.
f) Hydroseed or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for ten days or more). g) Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply non-toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiled materials.
h) Install sandbags or other erosion-control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways.
i) Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. j) Watering should be used to control dust generation during the break-up of pavement.
k) Cover all trucks hauling demolition debris from the site. l) Use dust-proof chutes to load debris into trucks whenever feasible.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 448 of 478
m) Water or cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand or other materials that can be blown by the wind.
n) All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be in proper running order prior to operation.
o) Diesel powered equipment shall not be left inactive and idling for more than five minutes, and shall comply with applicable BAAQMD rules. p) Use alternative fueled construction equipment, if possible. q) All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. r) Post a visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 24 hours. The Air District phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 103. Developer and its contractors shall implement dust and noise control measures during the duration of the project construction, including holidays and weekends. 104. All construction equipment shall be properly tuned and maintained to keep NOX emissions to a minimum during construction. Maintenance records for all construction vehicles shall be kept on site.
105. Construction contractors shall locate fixed construction equipment (such as compressors and generators) and construction staging areas as far as possible from adjacent residences.
106. A Maintenance Plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer indicating contractor responsibility for complying with the erosion control plan for the duration of the construction project, making necessary inspections and repairs. 107. Developer shall install erosion control measures on any individual lots that are not developed simultaneously.
108. All utility work, including trench restoration, in the public right-of-way shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
109. Any work in the public right-of-way shall be performed between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday excluding holidays. 110. Road and sidewalk closures shall be requested and approved by the City’s project manager at least 48 hours in advance of each occurrence. Traffic control plan(s) shall be submitted and approved prior to request for road and sidewalk closure. 111. The Developer shall apply for and obtain a Grading Permit. Plot and Finished Grading Plan shall be prepared by a California licensed Civil Engineer.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 449 of 478
112. Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the Developer shall provide Public Works Department with a plan indicating the amount of soil to be removed, disposal sites, the number of truck trips required and the proposed haul routes. Final haul route shall be approved by the City Engineer. Cost for on- and off-hauling shall be determined based on the fee schedule at the time of hauling. 113. Construction activity resulting in a land disturbance of one acre or more, or less than one acre but part of a larger development shall obtain the Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit (General Permit) from the State Water Quality Control Board. The State requires a completed Notice of Intent to comply (NOI) package and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared in accordance with Section A of the General Permit prior to the commencement of soil disturbing activities. The State will issue a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number within 10 business days after it receives a complete NOI package (original signed NOI, vicinity map, and check). Developer shall also submit copies of the NOI and SWPPP to the City for review and approval. Throughout the project life, the SWPPP shall be revised as necessary to accommodate site changes during to construction. 114. Temporary control structures shall remain in place until the site is completely developed. A maintenance plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer indicating the contractor’s responsibility for complying with the erosion and sediment control plan for the duration of construction. The maintenance plan shall include dust control, but is not limited to the best management practices outlined in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and shall be to the satisfaction of the City of San Bruno and meet all Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requirements. 115. Prior to the issuance of any permits for public improvements or work within easements, certificates of insurance shall be provided to the City verifying that both the Applicant and any contractors have public liability insurance. The amount and type of insurance shall be reviewed by the City and shall be sufficient to cover damages that may result from construction and operations. The insurance limits shall be as required by the City Attorney. Combined single limit coverage and the policy shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.

I. Prior to Occupancy
116. Prior to Final Inspection, all pertinent conditions of approval and all improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 117. Prior to project acceptance by the City, the Developer shall retain a Civil Engineer to prepare “as-built” or “record” drawings, and the drawing shall be submitted in AutoCAD and PDF formats, any certifications, warranties and guarantees. 118. Prior to project acceptance by the City, the Developer shall prepare “Maintenance and Responsibility” drawings and shall be submitted in AutoCAD and PDF formats.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 450 of 478
119. The Developer shall provide all field survey data related to the project. The data shall be provided in AutoCAD drawing files.
120. AutoCAD files shall include vertical and horizontal data that is compatible with and can be exported to ArcGIS.
121. Any streetlights to be installed shall be operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
122. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining the LED all way stop signs for a duration of 6 months, with that duration beginning upon project acceptance by the City. At the end of that six month period, the Developer shall be responsible for removing the LED all way stop signs and replacing with standard all way stop signs.

II. On-Going
123. The Property Owner shall be responsible for conducting all servicing and maintenance as described and required by the stormwater treatment measure maintenance plan(s). Maintenance of all on-site and off-site design and treatment control measures shall be the owner’s responsibility.
124. Approved maintenance plans for stormwater treatment measures shall be kept onsite and made readily available to maintenance crews. Maintenance plans shall be strictly adhered to.
125. By April 1 each year, maintenance inspection and servicing reports for the stormwater treatment systems shall be submitted to the City Engineer for the previous calendar year (January 1 through December 31). 126. The Property Owner shall be required to pay for all municipal inspections of installed stormwater treatment systems as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board or the City.
127. Site access shall be granted to representatives of the City, the San Mateo County Mosquito and Vector Control District, and the Water Board, at any time, for the sole purpose of performing operation and maintenance inspections of the installed stormwater treatment systems. A statement to that effect shall be made a part of the Maintenance Agreement and Stormwater Treatment Measures Maintenance Agreement recorded against the properties.
128. Storm drainage improvements on private property shall be privately owned and maintained. Storm drain laterals, including those within the public right-of-way, shall be privately maintained, with responsibility terminating at connections to the public storm drain system.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 451 of 478
129. All private utilities (storm drain, sanitary sewer, water, electric, gas, etc.) and private road facilities within the development shall be maintained and repaired by the Property Owner and its successors and shall be memorialized in the maintenance and operations agreement.

Fire
130. Provide NFPA 13 Fire Sprinkler system throughout building and garages. Fire sprinkler system to utilize horn strobe units in place of bells. Fire Sprinkler system under separate fire permit.
131. The minimum fire flow is 1,500 gallons per minute with 20 lbs. residual pressure. The fire flow and residual pressure may be increased, as determined by the Fire Marshal, where the project utility lines will serve non-residential uses. 132. Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the Fire Department. The maximum distance between fire hydrants shall not exceed 500' on center. 133. There shall be clear language in the CC&Rs regarding parking restrictions and the HOAs' ability to remove vehicles parking in designated fire lanes. Draft copies shall be submitted to the fire department for review.
134. Provide a separate site map indicating curb cut with the "Fire Lane – No Parking SBMC

7.16.040" because most of the proposed street is 28 feet or less. 135. There shall be clear language in the CC&R's or similar regarding the ongoing maintenance of the WUI area to the east of all the houses. It shall be maintained throughout the year and subject to inspection by the Fire Department. 136. An approved project sign shall be placed at vehicle access points into the project during construction to assist emergency responders. The sign shall identify the address, as approved by the City of San Bruno. Such signs shall be visible and legible from the street fronting the project.
137. Construction material and vehicles shall not obstruct fire apparatus access to fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants, or buildings.
138. Drywall and other temporary heating devices shall be of an approved type, located away from combustible materials, and attended and maintained at all times. Heating devices shall not be operated after normal working hours without being attended to on an hourly basis.
139. If site survey or earthmoving work results in the discovery of hazardous materials in containers or what appears to be hazardous wastes released into the ground, the contractor or applicant shall immediately report the finding to the San Bruno Fire Department via phone at (650) 616-7096. All suspected areas shall be marked off with DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 452 of 478
approved signage or caution tape until such time that a representative from the Fire Department determines whether the release is reportable or not and if site remediation is required.
140. Temporary use of on-site generators with over 60 gallons of diesel fuel shall require a fire department permit and must meet the requirements of Chapter 6.95 of the Health and Safety Code, the San Bruno Fire Department, and the National Fire Codes. Contact the Fire Department at 650-616-7093 to initiate the permit application.

Prior to Building Permit Issuance
141. The Fire Marshal will approve a Safety Plan for the construction process before building permit issuance.

Construction Process
142. Fire Department access shall be maintained throughout construction, with a minimum of 20 feet of width.
143. Framing of combustible construction cannot commence until access roads, and the Fire Department approved public fire hydrants.
144. Testing of all fire systems shall be performed before the sales office can be opened for business.

Prior to Occupancy:
145. Prior to occupancy, all Fire and Life Systems must be finaled.

Police
146. All residences shall have backlit address lighting with a minimum of 4” numbers. 147. Adequate lighting of the treatment area, parking lots, driveways, circulation areas, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with enough lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on site.
148. Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows.
149. When applicable, perimeter fencing of open design, such as wrought iron, tubular steel, or densely meshed and heavy-posted chain link, should be installed in order to establish territoriality and defensible space, while maintaining natural surveillance.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 453 of 478
150. Proper signage shall be posted at the entrances to reflect the streets are private property parking.
151. Designated Fire lanes shall be clearly marked and painted properly for enforcement purposes.
152. An arterial stop sign shall be placed at the two driveways of the complex which enter onto Glenview Drive.
153. Proper signage shall be placed at the most southern driveway indicting it is a one-way street and that vehicles may not exit.
154. A standard set of CC&R’s will state what residents can and cannot do and it will be the homeowner’s association responsibility to enforce the rules.

Parks
155. Prior to approval of the Final Map, any and all proposed recreation amenities and facilities shall be reviewed, pre-approved, and signed off by Public Works Department staff.
156. Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant shall prepare a Landscape Plan for the proposed development. This Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by a geotechnical engineer and the City of San Bruno to assure expansive soil hazards identified in the design-level geotechnical report have been adequately assessed and the project can achieve conformance with geotechnical recommendations. The Landscape Plan shall be incorporated into the final project plan and be added as part of the project specifications related to grading, erosion control, and construction.
157. The developer shall comply with the City's heritage tree ordinance, section

8.25.050 of the San Bruno Municipal Code, which requires replacement planting of 2-24" box size tree or one 36" box size tree for each heritage tree removed. 158. The selection of street tree species and landscape pallet shall conform to City standards and reviewed by Community Services Department staff. 159. The project shall incorporate landscaping that minimizes irrigation and runoff, promotes surface infiltration, minimizes the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and incorporates other appropriate sustainable landscaping practices, in compliance with the City of San Bruno Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation Guidelines. A copy of these guidelines is to be included as an appendix to the CC&R’s. 160. The use of irrigation for landscape improvements shall contain either drip irrigation or low-flow overhead sprinklers. All trees shall be irrigated by bubblers.

Trees shall be irrigated on a separate valve than other plant material. All DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 454 of 478
irrigation valves shall contain a gate valve prior to the valve to allow for isolation and valve maintenance.
161. Prior to the issuance of a City building permit, the developer shall enter into a Maintenance of Landscaping Agreement for the maintenance of the proposed street trees, medians, and irrigation systems. The agreement shall run with the land and be binding upon successors in interest of the Developer. 162. Maintenance of neighborhood parks, passive park areas, street trees and landscaping shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. 163. All landscaping shall be maintained in a weed free healthy growing condition, and plants not thriving or dead shall be replaced.
164. After one year of occupancy the landscaping shall be inspected by a qualified landscape architect who shall verify the landscape condition and make recommendations in a memo report to be submitted to the Community Development Director.
165. Roof drains shall drain away from the building and be directed to landscaping or a stormwater treatment measure.

CityNet Services
166. The developer/contractor shall be responsible for labor and construction including the coordination with PG&E for excavating the joint trench, supplying and installing CATV conduits, excavating, supplying, and installing the CATV underground utility box as needed. Provide connection materials such as the riser to the existing utility pole and SCH40 2-inch conduits into the first San Bruno CityNet Services utility box on the project property. 167. The developer/contractor shall provide one SCH40 2-inch conduit connecting the main utility pole riser into the first outside underground utility box. 168. The developer/contractor shall provide connectivity between all utility boxes with SCH40 2-inch conduit and proofed with mule tape/pull rope inside. 169. Developer/Contractor will provide B-36 utility underground vaults with 12-inch extensions for connecting existing San Bruno CityNet Services network. Christy B-36 with 12" extensions (35 1/4"l x 22 1/4" x 12"h, plus 12" extension).

Underground utility boxes located in the street shall be traffic rated. 170. The developer/contractor shall provide connectivity inside each individual unit with a protected singlemode fiber inside a Microduct (see specs below for Microduct of equal or better) and routed from the demarcation point usually located at the side of the unit where the underground service conduit lateral terminates and into a main gang box or unit’s internal panel (media cabinet DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 455 of 478
where all communication wires terminate). This will terminate in each unit to provide Data, Video and VoIP services with an Optical Node Terminal (ONT) provided by CityNet Services.
171. Microduct Specifications:FieldShield Riser Rated 10/6 mm Microduct is a durable, crush resistant micro-conduit designed to increase the protection of fiber. Manufactured using high density thermoplastic, FieldShield Riser Rated Microduct offers superior durability and protection.
172. The developer is responsible for internal wiring of each unit in the SFR and additional outlets consisting of Ethernet Cat5E communication wires or better and Coax cables such as RG6 Trishield or better routed in homerun design for each outlet. Additional outlets shall be wired homerun to a main gang box or unit’s internal panel made of plastic material to help wireless transmission of data signal throughout the unit. This will terminate in each unit to provide data, phone and video services at the media cabinet/panel. The media cabinet will have a 120 VAC duplex electrical outlet grounded and have the minimum dimensions of H30”xW14”xD3.5” for a single provider and dimensions of H42”xW14”xD3.5” for multiple providers. Each residential unit shall have a main outlet in the living room and additional outlets in each bedroom. No splicing of cables within the units. All cables shall conform to CityNet Services requirements and terminated with an F-connector and Cat5E RJ45 jack at each wall plate outlet. 173. Contractors/Developer will always protect CityNet Services conduits and underground utility boxes during the construction phase. 174. Prior to occupancy, San Bruno CityNet Service pamphlets will be made available for all residents.

End of conditions.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 456 of 478
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 – 05

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN

BRUNO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PERMIT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR THE GLENVIEW TERRACE PROJECT (AR13-002, PDP12-001)
(APNs: 019-042-150, 019-042-160, AND 019-042-170)
WHEREAS, New Shidai Development, LLC ("Applicant") is the owner of that certain

3.28 acre site located at 850 Glenview Drive and 2880 and 2890 San Bruno Avenue W. in the City of San Bruno and more particularly described as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 019- 042-150, 019-042-160, and 019-042-170 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Applicant desires to develop on the Property the Glenview Terrace Project, which consists of a residential subdivision of 29 single-family homes with associated roadways and infrastructure (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, in order to develop the Project, Applicant has submitted an application to the City of San Bruno for approval of the following: (1) an amendment to the San Bruno General Plan to change the land use designation of a portion of the Property from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential; (2) an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to change the zoning district of a portion of the Property from Single Family Residential (R-1) to Planned Development (P-D) and amend the existing P-D District; (3) a Development Plan for the Property; (4) a Planned Development Permit; (5) a Vesting Tentative Map merging the existing three lots and subdividing the Property into 29 singlefamily parcels and common area parcels (6) and a Development Agreement and Affordable Housing Plan; and
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2022, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2022-02 recommending that the San Bruno City Council adopt an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), dated April 2021, and Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared by Raney Planning and Management, Inc. to analyze the environmental effects of the proposed project and, based on the type and intensity of land uses identified with the proposed project and the information contained in IS/MND, the project would not have a significant adverse effect on the environment that would not be mitigated by the proposed mitigation measures; and
WHEREAS, in Resolution Nos. 2022-03, and 2022-04, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council amend the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and approve the Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTM), as proposed by Applicant; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Public Hearing was mailed on April 47 2022, and duly posted in the San Mateo Times on Saturday, April 9, 2022, for consideration of a Planned Development Permit and Tentative Map; and
DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 457 of 478
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on the Planned Development Permit and Tentative Map on April 19, 2022 and on said date, the Public Hearing was opened, held and closed.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Bruno, based on facts in the staff reports, written and oral testimony, and exhibits presented:

1. With respect to the Planned Development Permit, the Planning Commission hereby finds that the proposed Planned Development Permit is consistent with the Development Plan, as recommended for approval.

2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Development Permit.

3. This Planned Development Permit shall not become effective until the effective date of the companion General Plan and Zoning Code Amendment and the Vesting Tentative Map approvals.

4. Upon the effective date, this Planned Development Permit approval shall be valid for a period of two years.

Date Planning Commission Chair

ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM
Planning Commission Secretary City Attorney
-o0oI, Michael P. Laughlin, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of San Bruno this 19
th day of April 2022 by the following vote:

AYES Commissioners: Harman, Biasotti, Johnson, Lethin, Morgan NOES Commissioners:

ABSENT Commissioners: Madden, Durazo
RECUSED Commissioners
DocuSign Envelope ID: 026A77FD-64F3-4BA3-B27F-56FA576E7C6F 5/2/2022
5/3/2022 5/3/2022
458 of 478

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
PUBLIC WORKS – ADMINISTRATION AND ENGINEERING
567 El Camino Real, San Bruno, CA 94066-4299
Voice: (650) 616-7065  Fax: (650) 794-1443
http://publicworks.sanbruno.ca.gov

TRAFFIC SAFETY AND PARKING COMMITTEE MINUTES
Wednesday, June 2, 2021 - 7:00 pm
San Bruno City Hall
567 El Camino Real
San Bruno, CA 94066

MINUTES

1. ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS -
A. ROLL CALL
TSPC Members: Present Absent
Vacant (Chair)
Scott Thomas X
John Lampros (Vice-Chair) X
Stephen Seymour X
Rhonda Collins X

Staff in Attendance:

David Wong, Public Works Department
Hae Won Ritchie, Public Works Department
Ed Rios, Police Department
Sayed Fakhry, Traffic Engineering Consultant
Public in Attendance Total: 1

2. REVIEW OF AGENDA
Approved as submitted.

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of May 5, 2021 meeting
Rhonda Collins made a motion to approve the minutes. Second by Scott Thomas. (M/Collins, S/Thomas: 3-0-0) Approved.

4. PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Marco Durazo announced his retirement from the TSPC and thanked the Committee and staff for their service.

5. REGULAR BUSINESS
A. All Way Stop Control at the Intersection of San Bruno Avenue and Glenview Drive 459 of 478
Traffic Safety and Parking Committee
Minutes of June 2, 2021 Meeting

Sayed Fakhry stated Glenview Terrace is a proposed 29 single-family residential development at the northeast corner of San Bruno Avenue and Glenview Drive. He reviewed existing street conditions, traffic analysis findings and signal/stop warrants at the intersection. This intersection does not meet the signal warrant it meets 4-way/all-way stop warrant. Based on queuing analysis performed as part of the study, the installation of all-way stop control on San Bruno Avenue will not create queuing length to exceed the available storage length and will not impact the nearby signalized intersection of Skyline Boulevard and San Bruno Avenue.

Staff is recommending that the project developers install four-way stop signs enhanced by LED, advanced stop warning signs, ADA ramps and high visibility crosswalk striping at this intersection.

Rhonda Collins asked about “prepare to stop” signs heading west on San Bruno Ave.

Sayed Fakhry stated there will be “advanced stop warning” signs installed in both directions 250 feet before the stop line.

John Lampros is concerned about vehicles traveling eastbound on San Bruno Avenue; will there will be traffic backup onto Skyline?
Sayed Fakhry stated a queue analysis was performed at this location to confirm traffic flow during peak hours in the morning and afternoon.

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD OPENED
None

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD CLOSED
Rhonda Collins made a motion to accept the staff recommendation that the project developers install four-way stop signs enhanced by LED, advanced stop warning signs, ADA ramps and high visibility crosswalk striping at this intersection and include “advanced stop warning” signs. Second by Scott Thomas. (M/Collins, S/Thomas: 3-0-0) Approved.

B. Discussion of Commercial Truck Traffic Issues on Walnut Street and 7th Avenue and Surrounding Areas
Sayed Fakhry stated members of the Traffic Safety and Parking Committee (TSPC) requested that staff evaluate the recurrence of commercial truck traffic using San Bruno Avenue and turning onto the residential streets of 2nd through 6th Avenue (Avenues) to access the commercial properties located at Walnut Street / 7th Avenue and on Shaw Road north of Highway 380; or using Shaw Road to access San Bruno Avenue through the Avenues. He reviewed the existing street conditions, parking conditions, existing signage and truck routes.

Sayed Fakhry stated staff intends to perform a study and return to the TSPC at a later date with specific recommendations to help alleviate violations of the commercial vehicle prohibitions on the residential streets of 2nd through 6th Avenue(s) and Walnut Street.

Scott Thomas thanked staff for addressing this issue.

Rhonda Collins stated commercial businesses need to be aware of the limitations on allowable truck sizes on this route.
460 of 478
Traffic Safety and Parking Committee
Minutes of June 2, 2021 Meeting

Hae Won Ritchie stated businesses can be encouraged to use the known truck routes, but there are a lot of businesses using large trucks along this route.

John Lampros asked about enforcement and the ability for residents to submit videos of trucks for the City to follow up with.

Ed Rios stated staff could possibly send a reminder notice to the driver if the license plate is captured, but an officer will not be able to issue a ticket.

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD OPENED
Dan Vargas, 7th Avenue, stated trucks coming from Shaw Road are committed to San Bruno Avenue the majority of the time and go either right and tear down street signs or left over the bollards. They should be stopped before going under 380. He hopes this gets fixed.

Dan Carpio, 6th Avenue, stated there needs to be a bigger sign when trucks come off 101 directing them up to San Mateo Avenue.

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD CLOSED
Rhonda Collins approves of the installation of a larger sign off 101.

John Lampros would also like larger and more specific signage along with enhanced enforcement.

6. REPORT OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND COMMITTEES
None

7. COMMENTS FROM COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Rhonda Collins asked about electing a new chair.

Hae Won Ritchie stated it will be an agenda item at the next meeting.

8. COMMENTS FROM STAFF
Hae Won Ritchie announced that she is acting as interim Public Works Director with the departure of Director Jimmy Tan.

9. ADJOURNMENT
Motion: To adjourn the Traffic Safety and Parking Committee (TSPC) meeting until its next regular scheduled meeting on July 7, 2021 at 7 p.m. Approved. Meeting adjourned, 8:24 pm. 461 of 478
Glenview Terrace
Summary of Comments from Neighbors
Neighborhood meetings were held on February 2, 2014 and March 24, 2014 Design
 Where are 3 story homes?
 Impact on traffic once people live there. It is very busy at corner of Glenview and San Bruno Already.  Where will people park? Overflow into neighborhood?  Project consistent with infrastructure upgrades going on?  Glenview is steep, it will be difficult to park on-street  Sight visibility concerns- coming out of Estates Drive and at corner of Glenview and San Bruno  This is a high density project in a low density neighborhood.  Check for water/underground springs  These houses don’t fit in  If you cut down the trees, the houses will be looking down right at us. What about privacy?  What about oversize vehicles? Where will they park?
 How will San Bruno be landscaped to be attractive? What about the fence?  31 houses is too many. This will result in at least 100 cars.  Can there be a stoplight?  Will there be low-income units?
 How much can be jammed in a small space?
 This design is not consistent with what Crestmoor residents were allowed to do when they were rebuilding their homes. (Why allow 3 stories?)  What green building standard will the houses be? Process  Need to notify entire neighborhood
 Was environmental contamination cleaned?
 Facts and timeline is very important to neighbors  What is the name of the developer? Why won’t they share information on their previous projects?
 Make information available online and send it in postal mail.  Make sure they pay their share of infrastructure upgrades. Trust Fund being used to make upgrades. This project shouldn’t get financial benefit from Trust Fund.

Construction
 Impact on traffic during construction
 Construction noise
 Construction dust
462 of 478

GLENVIEW TERRACE PROJECT
Neighborhood Public Meeting:

May 20, 2021 @6:00 to 7:00 pm PST
Question and Answers

1. QUESTION: Anonymous Attendee: How many below market rate units? ANSWER: There are 4 below market rate units

2. QUESTION: Anonymous Attendee: Why not more than 5 below market rate units? ANSWER: The City of San Bruno has a below market requirement of 15%. The Project will fulfill that requirement on-site

3. QUESTION: Charles Sloyer: What are the City's plans for the canyon? ANSWER: There has been talk of an installation of a trail project in Crestmoor Canyon, but the City of San Bruno doesn’t not have any plans for that area currently. The Project leaves space for a trail connection to Crestmoor Canyon and the development of the Project won’t preclude any future trail.

4. QUESTION: Stam: Who will maintain the common area space? Will there be an HOA? ANSWER: Yes, the Project will have an HOA to maintain the landscaping, defensible space, and private streets.

5. QUESTION: Charles Sloyer: Should there be public access to the canyon either through or next to the development?
ANSWER: See the answer in Question 3.

6. QUESTION: Anonymous Attendee: What is the price ranges of the houses ANSWER: The home prices have not been set. Home prices will be set closer to the time of construction. But prices will be similar to the other nearby single family home projects.

7. QUESTION: Anonymous Attendee: Are there plans in place now for the empty spaces across from this project on Glenview?
ANSWER: The land is surplus land owned by Caltrans that will be disposed of. The City of San Bruno might be interested in the site, but there are no plans at this time.

8. QUESTION: Charles Sloyer: What is the impact on parking on San Bruno Avenue and Glenview Drive?
ANSWER: Glenview Drive will have 4 curb cuts. Each home has 2 a car garage plus each driveway can accommodate an additional 2 cars. The private drive has 463 of 478
designated guest parking spaces in several locations for a total of 19 vehicles.

There already is no parking allowed on San Bruno Ave. Some street parking will be taken up temporarily during construction, but most worker parking will be on the development site.

9. QUESTION: Anonymous Attendee: The canyon area had erosion issues in 2020; will that affect the community of homes built?
ANSWER: The Project has taken that into account and has graded the site to maintain erosion control and added different measures including stormwater basins which store 56,000 gallons of water to deal with the water coming off the roadways in the Project. The City of San Bruno repaired the Crestmoor Canyon landslide at San Bruno Ave. and added additional erosion and stormwater run off prevention measures.

10. QUESTION: Stephan Marshall: Thank you for proceeding with this project. This development will not only beautify the neighborhood but will likely increase all of our property values.

ANSWER: Thank you.

11. QUESTION:Anonymous Attendee: Parking is not allowed on the private drive itself, is that accurate?
ANSWER: Correct, parking will not be permitted on the streets within the development.

Guest parking is restricted to the guest parking areas. 464 of 478
From: Thelma Tannis
Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 11:29 AM
To: Michael Smith <[email protected]>
Cc:

Subject: Glenview Terrace Project
Mr. Smith:

Good morning! We are a resident of San Bruno for more than 30 years. We are very interested in this Project and would like to receive information as to when and where we can apply for one of these homes. My husband is a U.S. Veteran and would appreciate it very much if the City of San Bruno can direct us where we can apply for one of these homes here in San Bruno. Thank you.

Thelma Tannis
465 of 478
-----Original Message-----
>> From: Patricia
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 8:53 PM
>> To: Michael Smith <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Request to repeat traffic study
>>
>> Mr. Smith,
>> Thank you for your thorough presentation on the Glenview development this evening. >>
>> As you heard, I am very concerned about rush hour traffic at the Glenview and San Bruno avenue intersection. Could you please request the stop light vs stop sign recommendation be reevaluated during the rush hour times? I have experienced a dangerous situation for pedestrians crossing San Bruno avenue and residents trying to turn left from San Bruno avenue onto Glenview. >>
>> Thank you for your consideration and attention.
>>
>> Patricia Briskin
>> Sent from my iPad
466 of 478
From: Melita Blucher
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 1:24 PM
To: Rico Medina <[email protected]>; Linda Mason <[email protected]>; Tom Hamilton <[email protected]>; Marty Medina <[email protected]>; Michael Salazar <[email protected]>; Michael Smith <[email protected]> Subject: Glenview Terrace
To all concerned:

I am a resident on Claremont Drive and attended the zoom Planning Commission meeting on April 19th.

I have concerns for the proposed project of 29 homes on 3.28 acres. The density is excessive. I do not think the proposed parking would be sufficient. Most people tend to use garages for storage and their cars would be parked on driveways or extra parking spaces or overflow to Glenview Drive. I foresee delivery trucks blocking their streets. I also have concerns about the increased traffic issues on San Bruno Avenue and on Glenview Drive, which is the southern entrance to our neighborhood. Our neighborhood homes have yards and space. This project has homes with very little space around the each home and does fit with our neighborhood feel.

Also, I am concerned about the Crestmoor Canyon. Building on the property raises the worries about more erosion. The canyon should not have more people and pets disturbing the nature and wildlife in the canyon. We need the open space preserved.

I do not feel that the outside entity (perhaps even foreign?) has our neighborhood and San Bruno’s best interest, but rather that they will walk away and financially prosper.

Please do not approve this project. Thank you for your consideration.

Melita Blucher
1500 Claremont Drive
650-740-6345
467 of 478
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Esola
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 1:46 PM
To: Rico Medina <[email protected]>; Jovan Grogan <[email protected]>; Linda Mason <[email protected]>; Marty Medina <[email protected]>; Michael Salazar <[email protected]>; Tom Hamilton <[email protected]>; Marc Zafferano <[email protected]>; Michael Smith <[email protected]> Subject: Crestmoor Building Project
Good Afternoon,
I have a very short request to ask of all of you that is sparked by our wonderful neighbor Ms Melita Blucher. She wrote a brilliant letter to all of you asking that you not vote for the pending construction project that will impact our Crestmoor neighborhood for twenty three months.

I am in complete agreement with each of the very strong points that she highlighted in her letter.

I would like to make one more point please. When I recently called a specific department and person within our San Bruno govt., I emphatically stated that the explosion and subsequent nine long years of construction have impacted our neighborhood residents forever. I was asked by this same individual that just because we had an explosion, does that mean that no more construction take place within Crestmoor. This comment really made me take a step back. I responded that due to the unique nature of what this neighborhood has already endured, it would be the appropriate moral choice not to allow this project to go forth in this particular neighborhood but to put it elsewhere. Another twenty three months of construction is not a pleasant thought by any means. In fact, it is often downright unthinkable.

We have lived in our home since 1984. If this project goes through, eleven of our 38 years in Crestmoor will have been enduring noisy, disruptive and often very unpleasant construction. I truly wonder how many in our city government would want this same scenario thrust upon them.

Please consider to the utmost what is going to take place in a neighborhood that already endured the unthinkable. We pray that your hearts make the right decision with the well being of all Crestmoor residents at the forefront.

Thank you kindly for allowing me to voice this concern.

Kindest regards,
Darlene (Alan) Esola
1491 Claremont Drive
Sent from my iPhone
468 of 478
City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE: June 28, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jovan Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Matthew Lee, Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Power Purchase Agreement with Peninsula Clean Energy to Deploy a Solar Photovoltaic System on the San Bruno Recreation and Aquatics Center Should the City Manager Determine Adequate Cost Efficiency or Other Community Benefits Associated with the Agreement
BACKGROUND: The City’s Recreation and Aquatic Center (RAC) is currently under construction to replace the existing Veterans Memorial Recreation Center located at 251 City Park Way in San Bruno, California. Once constructed, the RAC will be a new two-story, 49,500 square feet facility and will operate as the City’s aquatic, recreation, and community center with maximum occupancy of 2,400 people. The new facility will be constructed with an indoor/outdoor pool, gym, indoor elevated track, community hall, conference rooms, multifunction rooms, classrooms, and staff offices.

On June 8, 2021, the project budget was approved without a Solar Photovoltaic (PV) system budget allocation but did include an estimated cost of $1,298,000 for future PV consideration.

The RAC building was designed to be “Solar Ready” and is estimated to generate 420, kWh of solar power each year, which is enough to offset approximately one-third of the projected load of 1,279 kWh per year.

On September 7, 2021, the RAC notice-to-proceed (NTP) was issued to Lathrop Construction to begin construction. The project is currently at the earlier phase of construction and expected ready to receive solar PV panels and related electrical and structural work to support the solar system by June 2023. The project completion for public use is expected in Fall of 2023.

On October 20, 2021, staff informed the RAC Advisory Committee that they were still exploring options to fund and install the Solar PV system. Staff explored options with various vendors to fund the system and found Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) to be viable and economical for the RAC project. Peninsula Clean Energy is San Mateo County’s not for profit locally led electricity provider, serving many agencies along the peninsula.

On March 21, 2022, City staff and PCE presented to the RAC Advisory Committee with the option to participate in a new program PCE is piloting for local governments to develop solar projects for city and county facilities. Through this program, PCE will design systems, run a competitive solicitation for equipment and manage installation, operations, and maintenance of the systems. The City would sign a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with a specified price for the energy generated by the solar systems. The equipment cost is amortized and paid for over 469 of 478
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
June 14, 2022

the term of the PPA out of a portion of the energy savings the solar system generates. RAC Advisory Committee Members asked about the option to fully purchase the system. PCE staff advised that purchase is not an option in its program. Furthermore, purchasing the system outright will require the city to install, maintain, fully fund the solar panels. The city currently does not have the funds to be able to do so. Furthermore, it was advised that the city would not be able to capture the federal tax benefits available for solar projects due to its tax-exempt status.

In the RAC Advisory Committee meeting, it was mentioned that the following agencies have passed a resolution for their respective projects to participate in PCE’s program: Atherton, Belmont, Brisbane, Colma, Hillsborough, Millbrae, Pacifica, Redwood City, San Carlos, San Mateo, and San Mateo County. These projects are included in PCE’s current portfolio and are scheduled to be solicited in this year’s RFP for competitive pricing from various equipment suppliers and installers. The anticipated installation of those projects is in Summer 2023, coincides with the RAC’s completion date and ready to accommodate the installation of the Solar PV system if approved.

In RAC Advisory Committee meeting, it was reiterated that there would be no obligation to move forward if PCE is unable to offer a PPA rate for the Solar PV system that will provide the City with acceptable net savings or other community benefits as determined by the City.

The RAC Advisory Committee Update concluded that City staff will return to the Council for approval to authorize the City Manager to execute the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with PCE and be added to PCE’s current portfolio of projects to receive competitive prices from various equipment supplier and installers.

On April 4, 2022, City staff presented the two funding options to the San Bruno Community Foundation. PCE was present and answered questions regarding the options. On June 14th, 2022 City Council set a public hearing date to be held on June 28th 2022 for the proposed Power Purchase Agreement.

DISCUSSION: Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) has collaborated with its Joint Power Authority (JPA) members, including the City, to identify candidate facilities to receive a Solar PV system and to develop designs for these sites. At PCE’s expense, PCE engaged an established independent engineering firm via competitive solicitation and is working with City staff and design team to incorporate the designed Solar PV system.

Solar PV Design
The Solar PV design is a roof mounted system that will receive approximately 272 kWh of solar that will generate approximately 420 kWh each year. The anticipated solar power generation will offset 30% of the anticipated load when the building is fully operational.

City staff and G4’s solar design team coordinated with PCE’s engineering consultant to review the preliminary RAC solar PV design. Both the City and PCE staff thought that there was potential for a mutually beneficial partnership regarding solar installation at the RAC building. A follow-up meeting with PCE’s staff and PCE’s engineering partner, McCalmont Engineering, will be held if necessary, including site review walkthrough, plan review, and future load review to properly assess the City’s options.
470 of 478
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
June 14, 2022

The Solar PV system will be constructed “battery ready” for future consideration. The RAC building will be constructed with a generator that will allow the facility to remain operational during an outage or in an event of emergency.

Competitive Solicitation for Vendors

Peninsula Clean Energy will run a competitive solicitation (RFP) utilizing County of San Mateo guidelines for procurement, including the requirement of prevailing wage. PCE will evaluate for “best value” based upon several substantive variables, including but not limited to: price (inclusive of potential impacts from change orders), vendor experience and qualifications, equipment and warranties, performance guarantee, schedule, local business participation, and overall thoroughness of proposal and responsiveness to this RFP.

Once pricing has been received, PCE will determine what PPA price it can offer to the City for the specified facility. Pricing will be specific to each facility in the portfolio based on the equipment to be deployed and facility-specific details. PCE will be transparent in its derivation of pricing with city officials, and if it is unable to offer a PPA price that would result in net financial savings, there would be no obligation to move forward.

Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) Overview
The PPA will be provided “at cost” by PCE to cover equipment and installation. PCE will also retain small $/kWh fee to cover its administrative costs to support the program and will be fully transparent with the City about all the financial details of the project. The City Manager will only enter into the agreement if it is determined that the power purchase agreement rate is lower than the savings generated from the solar panel at the current energy market rate.

As part of the agreement, PCE will design, construct, own, and maintain the PV system. PCE will sell the electricity generated from the solar PV panels for an agreed fix rate per kilowatt hour (kWh) lower than PG&E’s rate that increases annually. The PPA rate per kilowatt hour (kWh) will be dependent on the solicited competitive prices from various supplier and installer.

At the end of the 20-year PPA term, the City will have the option to purchase the systems at the Fair Market Value (FMV) as independently appraised at that time. This is a requirement of federal tax rules related to the Investment Tax Credit. PCE has been advised the FMV would likely be approximately 10% of the procurement cost, however the actual cost will be determined by an appraiser. The City would also have the option to have PCE, at its expense, remove the solar system. The City would also have buyout options at outer years, but not before year 6.

BENEFITS TO THE CITY:

The benefits of this project include:
 No upfront cost
 Electricity costs for generated power will be fixed pursuant to the agreement terms  The provider qualifies for various incentive programs that the City as a public agency does not, which will reduce installation costs when compared to contracting directly for 471 of 478
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
June 14, 2022

installation.
 Guaranteed production and storage. The provider will be responsible for maintenance of the system over the term of the agreement to provide the guaranteed level of production and storage.
 Monthly payments may be less than estimated energy costs purchased from the grid through PG&E / PCE throughout the life cycle of the agreement  PCE will execute all aspects of the procurement process.  PCE will administer the construction and maintenance of the Solar PV system.  The City will obtain financial and environmental benefits of a Solar PV system with no upfront cost and without incurring the cost of running its own solicitation.  The City will generate local renewable energy to advance its sustainability objectives at its facilities.
 The City will hedge against variable utility rates over the course of a 20+ years.

It important to note, that the California Public Utilities Commission is currently engaged in rulemaking for changes to the Net Energy Metering (NEM) tariffs governing solar PV resources. It is expected that the next iteration of NEM (NEM 3) will be less advantageous for solar and may negatively affect project economics. PCE is keeping apprised of any associated impacts and may adjust their overall project accordingly.

California Government Code Section 4217.12 states a public agency may enter into an energy service contract and any necessarily related facility ground lease on terms that its governing body determines are in the best interests of the public agency if the determination is made at a regularly scheduled public hearing, public notice of which is given at least two weeks in advance, and if the governing body finds:
(1) That the anticipated cost to the public agency for thermal or electrical energy or conservation services provided by the energy conservation facility under the contract will be less than the anticipated marginal cost to the public agency of thermal, electrical, or other energy that would have been consumed by the public agency in the absence of those purchases. (2) That the difference, if any, between the fair rental value for the real property subject to the facility ground lease and the agreed rent, is anticipated to be offset by below-market energy purchases or other benefits provided under the energy service contract.

California Government Code Section 4217.13 states a public agency may enter into a facility financing contract and a facility ground lease on terms that its governing body determines are in the best interest of the public agency if the determination is made at a regularly scheduled public hearing, public notice of which is given at least two weeks in advance, and if the governing body finds that funds for the repayment of the financing or the cost of design, construction, and operation of the energy conservation facility, or both, as required by the contract, are projected to be available from revenues resulting from sales of electricity or thermal energy from the facility or from funding that otherwise would have been used for purchase of electrical, thermal, or other energy required by the public agency in the absence of the energy conservation facility, or both. State agency heads may make these findings without holding a public hearing.
472 of 478
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
June 14, 2022

FISCAL IMPACT: Staff time for implementing the Solar PV System are included in the Project Management Budget.

There will be no upfront cost as noted above to the City. Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) will manage the procurement process, financing, installation, operation, and maintenance and offer a long term-term Power Purchase Agreement to the City for a specified price ($/kWh) that may be lower than the market price the City would pay for that same energy from a utility company.

The estimated solar power production of 420 kWh per year is about 30% of the projected power usage that will be billed at the PPA fixed rate, which may be lower than PG&E’s rate, resulting in savings in the City’s utility expenditures. The estimate of savings will be provided after PCE finalizes its program with all participating agencies.

If Peninsula Clean Energy is unable to offer a PPA rate for the Solar PV System that will provide the City with acceptable net savings or other community benefits as determined by the City, then there will be no obligation to move forward.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: There is no environmental impact
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Power Purchase Agreement with Peninsula Clean Energy to Deploy a Solar Photovoltaic System on the San Bruno Recreation and Aquatics Center Should the City Manager Determine Adequate Cost Efficiency or Other Community Benefits Associated with the Agreement ALTERNATIVES:

1. Do not authorize the City Manager to execute a Power Purchase Agreement with Peninsula Clean Energy and appropriate full funds to purchase, install, and maintain the solar PV system for the RAC.

2. Do not authorize the City Manager to execute a Power Purchase Agreement with Peninsula Clean Energy and do not install any solar PV system for the RAC.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Project Location Map

3. PCE’s Draft Cost Benefit Analysis
473 of 478
RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ___

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A POWER

PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH PENINSULA CLEAN ENERGY TO DEPLOY A

SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM ON THE SAN BRUNO RECREATION AND

AQUATICS CENTER SHOULD THE CITY MANAGER DETERMINE ADEQUATE COST

EFFICIENCY OR OTHER COMMUNITY BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH THE

AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the new Recreation and Aquatic Center (RAC) will be located at 251 City Park Way, replacing the existing Veterans Memorial Recreation Center, and will be a modern, 2-story, 49,500 square foot facility that will operate as the City’s aquatic, recreation, and community center; and
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2021, the project budget was approved without a Solar Photovoltaic (PV) System budget allocation but did include an estimated cost of $1,298,000 for future PV consideration; and
WHEREAS, the RAC building was designed to be “Solar Ready” and is estimated to generate a substantial 420 killowatt hours (kWH), or about one-third of the projected power usage, of solar energy per year; and
WHEREAS, the construction notice-to-proceed was issued on September 7, 2021 and the RAC building is expected to be ready to receive solar PV panels by June 2023; and WHEREAS, on October 20, 2021, City staff informed the RAC Advisory Committee that the Solar PV System was one of the capital campaign goals and should be pursued; and
WHEREAS, City staff found Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), San Mateo County’s not-for-profit, locally-led electricity provider, to be a viable and economical vendor to fund the Solar PV System; and
WHEREAS, on March 21, 2022, City staff and PCE provided a presentation to the RAC Advisory Committee outlining a pilot program that aims to develop solar projects for city and county facilities throughout the Bay Area; and
WHEREAS, agencies from several cities and counties have already passed resolutions to participate in PCE’s solar program, including Atherton, Belmont, Brisbane, Colma, Hillsborough, Millbrae, Pacifica, Redwood City, San Carlos, San Mateo, and San Mateo County; and
WHEREAS, PCE will complete the design, execute procurement processes, solicit competitive prices, construct, maintain, and own the Solar PV System, building it also to be “Battery Ready”; and
WHEREAS, a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), negotiated and signed by the City and PCE, will be provided “at cost” by PCE to cover equipment and installation costs, and will set a fixed rate per kWh for the energy generated by the Solar PV System; and 474 of 478
2 WHEREAS, there will be no upfront cost to the City, and incurred costs will be amortized and paid for over the term of the PPA out of a portion of the energy savings the system generates and a small $/kWh fee charged, in good faith and with full financial transparency, by PCE to cover expenses; and
WHEREAS, monthly payments by the City will be structured to be less than the estimated cost of purchasing energy from the grid through PG&E; and WHEREAS, after the 20-year PPA term ends, the City will have the option to purchase the Solar PV System at the Fair Market Value (FMV), as independently appraised at that time, or have PCE remove it, at its expense, or enlist other buyout options, but not before year six; and
WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Commission is modifying the Net Energy Metering (NEM) tariffs that govern Solar PV resources, signaling the next iteration of NEM (NEM 3) may be less advantageous to solar, and PCE will keep the City apprised of any associated impacts and will adjust the overall project accordingly; and WHEREAS, the PPA rate will provide the City with acceptable net saving and other community benefits as determined by the City, and, if PCE is unable meet these goals, the City will be under no obligation to move forward with the process; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 4217.12 states that a public agency may enter into an energy service contract and any necessary facility ground lease if the agency determines that the terms are in the public interest at a regularly scheduled public hearing, providing two weeks’ notice to the public thereof, and that the marginal cost of the new energy contract will be less than costs of doing business as usual; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 4217.13 states that a public agency may enter into a facility financing contract and any facility ground lease if the agency determines that the terms are in the public interest at a regularly scheduled public hearing, providing two weeks’ notice to the public thereof, and that the repayment of the costs associated with the design, construction, and/or operation of the energy facility be settled through revenues from energy sales and/or funding from cost savings that would have been used for the purchase of energy; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed PPA.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Bruno City Council hereby determines that (i) the terms of the PPA are in the public interest, (ii) the marginal cost of the PPA will be less than costs of doing business as usual, and (iii) the repayment of the costs associated with the design, construction, and operation of the energy facility will be settled through revenues from energy sales and/or funding from cost savings that would have been used for the purchase of energy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the San Bruno City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into a Power Purchase Agreement with Peninsula Clean Energy to deploy a Solar Photovoltaic System and Battery on the San Bruno Recreation and Aquatics Center should the City Manager determine adequate cost efficiency and community benefits associated with the agreement.
475 of 478
3 Dated: June 28, 2022
-o0oI, Vicky Hasha, Deputy City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and
adopted by the City Council of the City of San Bruno this 28th day of June 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

Vicky Hasha
Deputy City Clerk
476 of 478
Project Location Map
477 of 478
Year 1 Inputs
kWh/year generation 408,200 kWh/yearValue of Year 1 ENERGY at current PG&E rates $80,295Demand charge savings (2019) $8,030Savings available to customer (net of equipment and PCE costs) $36,677PPA Cost - Year 1 $51,647PPA Cost - Year 1 - $/kWh $0.13 NOTE: THE ACTUAL PPA RATE HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED YET. THIS IS AN ESTIMATE!

ACTUAL PPA RATE WILL BE DETERMINED AFTER RECEIVING EQUIPMENT PRICING Assumptions:Regular utility bill escalation ($/kWh component) 5% per yearPPA escalation 1% per yearCalculationsYear 1 savings $36,677Year 20 savings $160,797Savings (simple) $1,783,321NPV savings (2% discount rate) for PPA option $1,389,215 Year--> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Estimated total value of utility bill savings $88,325 $92,741 $97,378 $102,247 $107,359 $112,727 $118,364 $124,282 $130,496 $137,021 $143,872 $151,065 $158,619 $166,550 $174,877 $183,621 $192,802 $202,442 $212,564 $223,193PPA Cost $51,647 $52,164 $52,686 $53,212 $53,745 $54,282 $54,825 $55,373 $55,927 $56,486 $57,051 $57,621 $58,198 $58,780 $59,367 $59,961 $60,561 $61,166 $61,778 $62,396Net Savings $36,677 $40,577 $44,693 $49,035 $53,615 $58,445 $63,539 $68,909 $74,569 $80,535 $86,821 $93,444 $100,421 $107,770 $115,510 $123,660 $132,241 $141,276 $150,786 $160,797Notes:Panel degradation, expected 0.5%/year, not accounted for. Will not meaningfully change analysis.Disclaimer: This is a simple analysis for comparison purposes, at city's request. If purchasing, city will not be able to monetize the tax benefits (ITC or depreciation), a portion of which are captured in the PPA model abovePurchase price $ 1,200,000 Quote provided by RodDiscount rate 2% Year--> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Capital Cost $ (1,200,000)Other costs (running RFP, vendor negotiations, maintenance, operations) - not estimating a value but noting they are costsEnergy savings $ - $ 88,325 $ 92,741 $ 97,378 $ 102,247 $ 107,359 $ 112,727 $ 118,364 $ 124,282 $ 130,496 $ 137,021 $ 143,872 $ 151,065 $ 158,619 $ 166,550 $ 174,877 $ 183,621 $ 192,802 $ 202,442 $ 212,564 $ 223,193Cash flow $ (1,200,000) $ 88,325 $ 92,741 $ 97,378 $ 102,247 $ 107,359 $ 112,727 $ 118,364 $ 124,282 $ 130,496 $ 137,021 $ 143,872 $ 151,065 $ 158,619 $ 166,550 $ 174,877 $ 183,621 $ 192,802 $ 202,442 $ 212,564 $ 223,193Cumulative Cash Flow $ (1,200,000) $ (1,111,675) $ (1,018,934) $ (921,556) $ (819,309) $ (711,949) $ (599,222) $ (480,858) $ (356,576) $ (226,080) $ (89,059) $ 54,812 $ 205,878 $ 364,497 $ 531,046 $ 705,924 $ 889,545 $ 1,082,347 $ 1,284,789 $ 1,497,353 $ 1,720,546NPV $1,091,092IRR 1%Payback Period 10 yearsIN BOTH OPTIONS THERE IS A VALUE TO THE SYSTEM AFTER YEAR 20In PPA scenario, the system would have to be purchased at Fair Market Value at start of Year 21. We don't know what FMV is, but do not expect it to be a high value.In purchase scenario, there would be no additional cost in year 20Life of system expected 25 to 30 yearsRevenue stream would be the same for either scenario starting in year 21. Difference is PPA scenario requires purchase at FMV.

Purchase Option

PPA OPTION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Hedge Against Rising PG&E Rates
PG&E Bill Solar PPA
PCE's Draft Cost Benefit Analysis
&nbsp;478 of&nbsp;478