Agenda, regular meeting, third session — San Bruno City Council, November 8, 2022

"The City With a Heart"
Rico E. Medina, Mayor
Linda Mason, Vice Mayor
Tom Hamilton, Councilmember
Marty Medina, Councilmember
Michael Salazar, Councilmember
AGENDA
SAN BRUNO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
November 8, 2022
7:00 PM
Consistent with Government Code Section 54953(e), this meeting will be held both in person and virtually.

City Councilmembers and members of the public may attend in person at the San Bruno Senior Center, or by teleconference, via Zoom or telephone. The meeting will be livestreamed at youtube.com/CityofSanBruno and available on CityNet Services local Channel 1 SD | local Channel 10 HD.

IN PERSON*
MEETING LOCATION
San Bruno Senior Center
1555 Crystal Springs Road
San Bruno, CA 94066
*Please turn off all electronic
devices before the start of the
meeting to prevent disruptions*
REMOTE VIA ZOOM or TELEPHONE
Zoom Link: https://sanbrunocagov.zoom.us/j/85042371038? pwd=bTVCdW9POG9OVWV0Q3lyN29XTXozdz09
Phone Line: 16465588656
Webinar ID: 850 4237 1038
Webinar Password: 225877
PUBLIC COMMENT: In person attendees who want to provide public comment, will be asked to fill out a speaker card and turn it into the City Clerk. Virtual attendees can comment by using the “Raise Hand” feature in Zoom to request to speak. For dialin comments press *9 to “Raise Hand” and *6 to unmute.

Public comment may also be emailed to [email protected]. Comments received via email will not be read aloud during the meeting.

ACCESSIBILITY: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals requiring special accommodations or modifications to participate in this meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Office 48 hours prior to the meeting at (650) 6167061 or [email protected].

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Individuals allowed three minutes. It is the Council’s policy to refer matters raised in this forum to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate. The Brown Act prohibits the Council from discussing or acting upon any matter not agendized pursuant to State Law.

5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Public comment will be requested after each topic in this section a. The San Bruno City Council will hold a special meeting on November 15, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. to provide a public hearing on the proposal to increase solid waste rates.

This meeting will be held at the San Bruno Senior Center, 1555 Crystal Springs Road, San Bruno.
b. Proclamation Declaring November 26, 2022 as Small Business Saturday in San Bruno
c. Adopt Resolution Honoring David Nigel as the 2020 Recipient of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award; and Adopt Resolution Honoring Dennis Sammut as the 2021 Recipient of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award d. There will be a Veterans Day observance at Golden Gate National Cemetery, 1300 Sneath Lane (Veterans Way) on Friday, November 11, 2022 at 11 AM to honor our veterans, with a band concert beginning at 10:30 AM. Presented by the Avenue of Flags Committee.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items are considered routine or implement an earlier Council action and may be enacted by one motion; there will be no separate discussion, unless requested. There will be a single public comment period for all items in this section unless a Councilmember requests to pull an item for a separate vote. a. Approve Accounts Payable for October 24, 2022 and October 31, 2022 b. Accept Payroll for October 23, 2022
c. Approve Investment Report Dated September 30, 2022
d. Receive Written Update on the City’s Response Efforts to COVID19 e. Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement With TJKM Transportation Consultants for Traffic Engineering Services on an AsNeeded Basis in the Amount of $265,000
f. Waive Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Amending Article III (Zoning) of Title 12 (Land Use) of the Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 12.265 (Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee) and Amending Chapter 12.260 (Development Impact Fee)
g. Community Flea Market 2023
h. Adopt Resolution Approving Publicly Available Pay Schedule Effective November 8, 2022, Pursuant to the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR)
i. Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement With Wilsey Ham for Design Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $233,740 for the 202122 Street Reconstruction Project (Project Number 60018)
j. Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement With Bellecci & Associates for Design Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $529,760 for the 202223 Street Rehabilitation Project (Project Number 60032) k. Adopt Resolution Approving CostofLiving Adjustments (COLAs) for the Unrepresented Assistant City Manager Position of 6% in Calendar Year 2022 and 3% in Calendar Year 2023

7. CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
Public comment will be requested after each topic in this section a. Receive First Quarter Financial Update Report for FY202223 as of September 30, 2022 and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Carryover of FY202223 Purchase Order Encumbrances and FY202223 Budget Amendments
b. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Creation of a Parking Fund, Authorizing the Transfer of $331,000 From the Downtown Parking Program Capital Improvement Project Into the Parking Fund, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a 5Year Contract With LAZ Parking in an Amount Not to Exceed $3,000,000 for Services Related to Parking Enforcement Following the Conclusion of the Meet and Confer Process per the Memorandum of Understanding Entered Into Between Police and the City

8. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS
Public comment will be requested after each topic in this section

9. ADJOURNMENT – The next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on December 13, 2022 at 7:00 p.m.

1 of 157

Public comment may also be emailed to [email protected]. Comments received via email will not be read aloud during the meeting.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

8. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS
Public comment will be requested after each topic in this section

9. ADJOURNMENT – The next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on December 13, 2022 at 7:00 p.m.

2 of 157

Public comment may also be emailed to [email protected]. Comments received via email will not be read aloud during the meeting.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

8. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS
Public comment will be requested after each topic in this section

9. ADJOURNMENT – The next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on December 13, 2022 at 7:00 p.m.

3 of 157

4 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Ann Mottola, Community Services Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Honoring David Nigel as the 2020 Recipient of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award; and Adopt Resolution Honoring Dennis Sammut as the 2021 Recipient of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award
BACKGROUND: In January 2009 as later amended in October 2010, the City Council approved the Memorial and Recognition Policy. Through the policy an awards program was created to recognize and honor the extraordinary community service of an individual or organization through the creation of three unique awards: Recognition of Special Services, Recognition of Extraordinary Service, and Personal Tribute.

Per the policy guidelines, a committee comprised of two members of each City Commission (Culture and Arts, Parks and Recreation, and Planning) meets to review nominations for the Recognition of Special Service and Recognition of Extraordinary Service. Five affirmative votes of the six-member committee are required to bring forward a recommendation to the City Council for its consideration and action. A majority City Council vote is required to approve an award. More than one recipient can receive the annual award. Both living and deceased individuals are eligible for the award.

In 2020 the city received a nomination from the Rotary Club of San Bruno and San Bruno Lions Club for the Award of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service recognizing long-time San Bruno resident, Mr. David Nigel. Due to COVID-19, the city did not convene a subcommittee to review the nomination and make a recommendation. In 2021, the Rotary Club of San Bruno and the San Bruno Lions Club nominated long-time San Bruno Business Owner and resident Mr. Dennis Sammut. A subcommittee was formed, and a meeting was scheduled and held on Thursday, July 7, 2022. Both nominations were reviewed.

DISCUSSION: The Memorial and Recognition Program Policy establishes the following criteria for the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award:

•At least two recognized San Bruno organizations must complete a nomination form; oThe nominee must have a minimum of twenty-five (25) years of dedicated service to San Bruno;
•The service rendered must demonstrate a positive impact on the citizens of San Bruno; •The nominee must be viewed as an appropriate role model in the community;

5 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 2 of 3 ends

•The nominee must demonstrate significant contributions to the community by developing new programs, providing leadership for the enhancement of existing programs, or by providing new or improved facilities; and,
•The nominee must demonstrate active involvement in multiple community programs influencing the lives of many San Bruno citizens.

The 2022 committee, comprised of Pamela Madden and Jeanne George (Culture and Arts Commission), Michael Palmer and Thomas Kuhn (Park and Recreation Commission), and Marco Durazo and Gerard Madden (Planning Commission), met on July 7, 2022, to review the applications. At the meeting, the committee discussed the many positive contributions of Mr.

Nigel and Mr. Sammut which were included in the nominations by the San Bruno Lions Club and Rotary Club of San Bruno.

Mr. Nigel was hired by the San Bruno Park School District to be a fourth-grade teacher at Decima M. Allen Elementary School. He went on to teach at Engvall Intermediate School where he taught creative writing and coached boys’ basketball teams. He spent 30 years of his career as a teacher and administrator in Burlingame. In 1995 he received the Dr. Virgil S. Hills Distinguished Service Award from the California Schoolmaster’s Club where he was president from 1984-1985. In March of 2014 he was honored for 50 years of membership, service, and leadership by the California Schoolmaster’s Club.

Mr. Nigel was appointed to the Parks and Recreation Commission in May of 1970. In his 52 years of service, he has worked and advocated for the development of recreation programs, park facility development, maintenance, and improvement. He is very active in the California Association of Parks and Recreation Commissioners and Board Members having served in all positions including Association President. His efforts are unmatched in raising thousands of dollars towards scholarships for college students majoring in Parks Management and Recreation Supervision. He was inducted into the organization’s Hall of Fame and is an Honorary Life Member. In 2016, Mr. Nigel was honored by the National Parks and Recreation Association with the Robert M. Artz Award which recognizes a citizen, elected, or appointed official who has demonstrated outstanding efforts to forward public parks and recreation through education and activating the public in the community.

Mr. Sammut was a civic minded business leader in the San Bruno community. He served on the Business and Economic Development Committee when it was established in 1996. Mr. Sammut created and distributed earthquake preparedness handbooks. He also researched and developed the 75th San Bruno Anniversary book. He also served on the Centennial Celebration committee.

Mr. Sammut was involved with many community programs including: the annual Posy Parade; Holiday Food Baskets, providing bags of food to families in need; and Operation Santa Claus, providing gifts for special needs students. He helped fund books and computers for the San Bruno Library and provided funds for the Recreation student scholarship fund. He also funded the modernization of the library at Parkside School and the upgrade of the book collection.

Mr. Sammut was a strong supporter of the programs and services, especially for the youth of San Bruno. He was quiet about the support he gave, but many programs would not have been possible without his contributions and involvement.

6 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

At the conclusion of the nomination review committee meeting, Pamela Madden made a motion to recommend to City Council that David Nigel receive the 2020 Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award and Dennis Sammut receive the 2021 Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award. Michael Palmer seconded the motion. The committee voted unanimously in favor of the motion.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The action is not a project subject to CEQA.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution honoring David Nigel as the 2020 recipient of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award; and adopt a resolution honoring Dennis Sammut as the 2021 Recipient of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award ALTERNATIVES:

1. Do not approve the nominations for Recognition of Extraordinary Service.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution honoring David Nigel as the 2020 Recipient of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award.

2. Resolution honoring Dennis Sammut as the 2021 Recipient of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award.

3. Nomination Applications for David Nigel from San Bruno Lions and the Rotary Club of San Bruno

4. Nomination Applications for Dennis Sammut Nigel from San Bruno Lions and the Rotary Club of San Bruno

7 of 157

RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -
RESOLUTION HONORING DAVID NIGEL AS THE 2020 RECIPIENT

WHEREAS, Mr. Nigel is very active in the California Association of Parks and Recreation Commissioners and Board Members having served in all positions including Association President and his efforts are unmatched in raising thousands of dollars towards scholarships for college students majoring in Parks Management and Recreation Supervision and he was inducted into the organization’s Hall of Fame and is an Honorary Life Member; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Nigel was honored by National Parks and Recreation Association with the Robert M. Artz Award which recognizes a citizen, elected, or appointed official who has demonstrated outstanding efforts to forward public parks and recreation through education and activating the public in the community; and WHEREAS, Mr. Nigel is passionate in his support for parks and recreation services and programs and dedicated much of his time raising funds for scholarships; and WHEREAS, two members of the Culture and Arts Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Planning Commission reviewed the nomination and recommend unanimously to the City Council that David Nigel be the recipient of the 2020 Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award.

8 of 157

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Bruno City Council hereby adopts a resolution honoring David Nigel as the 2020 recipient of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award.

Dated: November 8, 2022
ATTEST:

Vicky S. Hasha, Deputy City Clerk
---oOo---
I, Vicky S. Hasha, Deputy City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Bruno this 10th day of May 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT:Councilmembers:

9 of 157

RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -
RESOLUTION HONORING DENNIS SAMMUT AS THE 2021 RECIPIENT

OF THE RECOGNITION OF EXTRAORDINARY SERVICE AWARD
WHEREAS, the City of San Bruno has established a Memorial and Recognition Program Policy to permanently honor those individuals and organizations who have provided extraordinary service to our community; and
WHEREAS, the San Bruno Recognition Sculpture was created as an artistic expression of the City’s commitment to its citizens and as the primary means to publicly honor them; and
WHEREAS, the Rotary Club of San Bruno and the San Bruno Lions Club submitted a nomination of Recognition of Extraordinary Service for Dennis Sammut for 2021; and WHEREAS, Mr. Sammut was a civic minded business leader in the San Bruno community who served on the Business and Economic Development Committee when it was established in 1996; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Sammut created and distributed earthquake preparedness handbooks and researched and developed the 75th San Bruno Anniversary book, and served on the Centennial Celebration committee; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Sammut was involved with many community programs including: the annual Posy Parade; Holiday Food Baskets, providing bags of food to families in need; and Operation Santa Claus, providing gifts for special needs students; and WHEREAS, Mr. Sammut helped fund books and computers for the San Bruno Library and provided funds for the Recreation student scholarship fund; and WHEREAS, Mr. Sammut funded the modernization of the library at Parkside School and the upgrade of the book collection; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Sammut was a strong supporter of community programs and services, especially for the youth of San Bruno; and
WHEREAS, Many programs within the San Bruno Community would not have been possible without his contributions and involvement; and WHEREAS, two members of the Culture and Arts Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Planning Commission reviewed the nomination and recommend unanimously to the City Council that Dennis Sammut be the recipient of the 2021 Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Bruno City Council hereby adopts a resolution honoring Dennis Sammut as the 2021 recipient of the Recognition of Extraordinary Service Award.

Dated: November 8, 2022

10 of 157

ATTEST:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT:Councilmembers:

11 of 157

12 of 157

13 of 157

14 of 157

15 of 157

16 of 157

17 of 157

18 of 157

19 of 157

20 of 157

21 of 157

22 of 157

23 of 157

24 of 157

25 of 157

26 of 157

27 of 157

28 of 157

29 of 157

30 of 157

!4N'g
City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE: November 8, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bobby Magee, Interim Finance Director
PREPARED BY: Esther Garibay-Fernandes, Financial Services Manager SUBJECT: Monthly Investment Report - September 2022 The table below summarizes the investment portfolio's total book value by Investment type.

Investment Type Total Book Value
TriCounties Bank $11 ,956,851
Local Agency Investment Fund 25,955,526
San Ma-teo County Pool 27,'154,744
Government Agency Investments 74,383,142
Municipal Bonds 27,328,667
Certificate of Deposit 500,000
Money Market Investments 260,375
Total Investments $167,539,306
Respectfully submitted,
Iha:or
io)z&);zz
Date

31 of 157

Investments
Short Term Investments
TriCounties Bank Cash Balance
Pooled Investments
Local Agency Investment Fund
Glenview Fire Local Aqency Investment Fund
Total LAIF
San Mateo County Pool
Money Market Investments
u.s. Govemment Money Market
Total Money Market Investments
Certificate of Deposit
Morgan Stanley Bank Brokered CD
Morgan Stanley Pnvate Bank Brokered CD
Total Certfflcate of Deposit
Total Short Term Investments
Municipal Bonds
San Ftancisco Ca City/County Pub util
Riverside Community College Non-Callable GO
Califomia St Llniv Revenue Txbl Ref Ser B
Califomia St Federally Taxable Var
Calffomia St Federally Taxable Var
universijy Calif Revs Taxable Gen Bds
Los Angeles Calif Comm Coll Dist GOB Unlimited Tax Califomia St Univ Revenue
Califomia St Taxable Various GOB
Pasadena USD non-callable GOB
Los Angeles Unified SD non-callable
Southem Califomia St Public Pwer Auth
San Jose CA Redev Agy Successor Agy Tax Allocation San Jose CA Redev Agy Successor Agy Tax Allocation Cupertino LIHSD Taxable non-callable GOB
Santa Monica CCD taxable non-callable GOB
Los Angeles Calif Comm Coll Dist GOB unlimited Tax San Dieguito CA Union High Sch Dist
Calffomia StTaxable BID non-callable
Califomia St Taxable BID non-callable
Califomia St Univ Revenue
Los Angeles CA Depj of ARPTS ARPT Revenue
Total Municipal Bonds Investments
Coupon
Rate

1.95%
190%
[) 50%
3 61%
21 8%

3.38%

0.88%

0.77%

0.89%

2.65%

2.07%
146%

1.26%

3.1 8%

2. 1 5%
104%
j.l7%
1 86%

2.38%

1.14%
L 1 0%
CuSIP
31 846V567
61690L1PF1
61760A3L1
79771 F AW7
76886PFF5
13077DHM7
13063DGB8
i3063DGB8
91412HGE7
54438CYK2
13077DML3
13063DMA3
702282QD9
544547FC';1
842475P82
798170AJ5
798170AJ5
231 237P28
802385RR7
54438CYLO
797508HF8
13063DRD2
13063DRD2
13077DQE5
544445TW9

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
Portfolio Summary
September 30, 2022
Book Value
11,956,851
22,655,355
3,300,171

26.968,62 €
Market Value YTM
27,154,744
260,375
260,375
11,956,861
22,655,355
3,3(tl,171

25.955,528
27,164,744
260,375
280,376
O.OO%
1 .51 %
1 .51 %
1 .34%

0.30%

1.84%
180%

0.78%

0. 70%

1. 51%

0.69%

0.65%
0 65%
[].77%
L64%

1.07%

1.09%
'1.35%

4.77%

1. 51%

2. 09%

0.96%

0. 90%

1. 22%

2. 17%

1.28%
137%
114%

3.74%
City of San Bruna
567 EI Camino Real
San Bruno, CA 94066
Maturity Date
N/A
NA
November 29, 2024
November 29, 2024
November '1, 2023
August 4, 2024
November 4 2024
Aprill2025
April 1, 2025
May 15, 2025
August 12025
November 1 2025
Apnl1, 2026
May 4, 2026
July 1, 2026
July 1, 2026
August S, 2026
August S, 2026
August 1, 2026
August 12026
August 12026
August j, 2026
October 1, 2026
OcioberS 2026
November j 2026
May S 5, 2[)27
% of
Portfolio
7%
16%
0%
01 5%

0. j 5%
0%

Page 1 ends

32 of 157

Investments
US Treasuries & Aqencies
u.s. Treasury Notes
L1.S Treasury Notes (WIT)
Ll.S. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
U S. Treasury Notes
u.S Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasuiy Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
L1.S. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
U S. Treasury Notes
ll.S Treasury Notes
L1.S Treasury Notes
Ll S. Treasury Notes
u S. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
ll.S. Treasury Noies
u.s. Treasury Notes
ll.S. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Tteasiiry Notes
Federal Home Loan Bank
u.s. Treasury Notes
ll.S. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes (WIT)
u S. Treasury Notes (WIT)
u.s. Treasury Notes (WI T)
u.s. Treasury Notes (WI T)
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.S Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
u.s. Treasury Notes
Total u.s. Treasuries & Agencies
Coupon
Rate

2.88%
0 50%

0.75%

0.88%
01 3%

0.25%

2.25%

2.00%

4.7P/o

0.38%
125%

0.38%
150%
2 25%
1 75%

1.38%
1 1 3%

0.50%

0.25%

0.25%
0 25%
0 25%

0.26%

0.38%

0. 38%

1. 57%
0 51 %

0.75%

0.75%
t63%

0.88%

0.63%

0.75%
163%

0. 88%

1. 13%
11 3%

1.25%
125%
S 25%
188%

2.50%

0.50%
CuSIP
9128285K2
91282CDMO
91282C[)R9
91282CDVO
91282CBM2
91282CBR1
9128286R6
912828XT2
91 2828628
91282CCL3
912828YE4
91282CCX7
912828YM6
912828G38
gt 2828YYO
912828252
91 2828ZC7
912828ZFO
912828ZW3
91282CAB7
91282CAJO
91282CAM3
91282CAT8
91 282C AZ4
91282CBC4
91282CBH3
912828P46
91282CBQ3
91282CBT7
91282CBWO
912828R36
3130AN4T4
91282CCP4
91282CCW9
91 2828YG9
91282CCZ2
91282CDG3
91282CDG3
91282CDK4
91282CDQ1
91 2828Z78
91282CEC1
91282CEF4
912828ZN3

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
Portfolio Summary
September 30, 2022
Book Value
1,509,141
999,398
1,457,168
1,972,344
1,957,031
1,963,906
i ,541 ,836
1 ,542,658
1 ,536,680
1 ,981 ,406
1,013,750
1 ,991 ,563
3,611 ,016
2,115,000
2,081,563
2,055,313
2,036,016
1,9sg,219
i ,963,750
1,305,746
1,958,750
1 ,967 446
1 ,465,547
'1,962,891
1,971 fl78
970,234
z,ozs,agi
1 ,966,172
1 ,884,859
1 ,987,813
1 ,456,000
1,u8,747
992,773
1,997,813
1 ,034,219
gg7,227
995,391
996,367
1 ,501 ,684
1 ,647,422
1,995,685
1,982,500
1,475,156
1 ,326,680
74,383,142
Market Value
1,477,380
957,070
1 ,435,965
1 ,910,700
t,sag,t<o
1,886,020
1 ,452,300
1 ,444,635
i436130
1 ,867 420
g<s,teO
1,855,400
3,309,705
1 ,918,440
1 ,895,000
1 ,873,280
1 ,857,340
1 ,824,620
1 ,795,080
1,184,325
1,781 ,640
1,777,500
1 ,328,385
1 ,773,200
1 ,768,520
880,860
1 ,836,640
1 ,764,760
1 ,687,067
1,771 ,020
1 ,279,628
i ,019,406
874,570
1 ,753,980
907,8!)0
879,730
888,168
887 035
1 ,334,820
i ,465,596
i ,792.820
1 ,821 ,400
1,401,210
1 ,275,885
68,164,837
YTM

0.53%

2.48%
159%
1 20%
1 10%
102%

0.82%
[).77%

0.73%

0.75%

0.52%

0.54%

0.53%

0.58%

0.60%

0.63%

0.64%
0 7S%

0.60%
0 75%

0.63%

0.76%

0.78%

0.69%
11 0%
0 84%

0.85%
0 91%

0.88%

0.80%

0.90%

0.77%

0.92%

0.93%
122%
S 20%
123%

1.28%

1. 55%

2. 06%

2.86%

2.86%
City ol San Btuno
567 EI Camino Real
San Bruno, CA 94066
Maturity Date
% Of
Portfolio
October 31 2023
November 30, 2023
December 31 2023
January 31 2024
February 15, 2024
March 15, 2024
Apnl 30, 2024
May 31, 2024
June 30, 2024
July 15, 2024
August 31, 2024
September j5, 2024
Ot.tober 31, 2024
November 15, 2024
December 31 2024
January 31 2025
February 28, 2025
March 31 2025
June 30, 2025
July 31 2025
August 31 2025
September 30, 2025
October 31 2025
November 30, 2025
December 31 2025
January 31 2026
February 15, 2026
February 28, 2026
March 31 2026
Apnl 30, 2026
May S 5, 2026
June 12, 2026
July 31, 2026
August 31 2026
September 30, 2026
September 30, 2026
October al2026
October 3'l 2026
November 30 2026
December 31 2026
January 31 2027
February 28, 2027
March 31 2027
April 30, 2027
TOTAL PORTOFLK) 167,539,3 €16 1!i8,623,8(15
TOT AL INVESTMENTS, EXCLUDING BANK BALANCE 166,682,4!i4 146,666,964 There is adequate cash flOW and maturity of investments to meet the Cih/s needs for the nexi six months.

Prepared By 1012 S j2022

Page 2 ends

33 of 157

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
Portfolio Sumniary Metrics
Septem ber 30, 2022
Momhly Ponfolio Allocation by Investment
Sector (6Millions)
TriCounties Bank
Local Agency Investment Fund - Pooled
San Mateo Countv Pool
Govemment Agency Inveitmenti
Murucipal Bond Investments
US Treasury Bills
Certificatei of Depoiit
Money MaAet
Total
Sep-20 act-20 Nov40 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apt-21 May-21 lun-21 lul-21 Aug41 Sep-21 0d21 Nov-21 Dec-21 lan-22 Feb-22 Mar-22 Apr-22 May-22 Jun-22 lul-22 Aug-22 Se(h22 S155 S178 5223 516.4 5145 5229 578 S103 5171 5128 S14!1 S166 5164 5215 516.5 517.4 S173 52(H S201 517.!1 515.8 5132 S29.4 S163 Sllg287 287 28.8 568 648 648 748 749 749 549 sis 495 444 41.3 39.6 380 33.1 297 256 291 26.9 269 zxg 260 26050 7 4(i.S 41.g 43.g 3531 314 31 9 33 8 30 2 27 4 24 S 24 9 251 25.7 26 2 23 g 2S.!1 26 1 26 7 23 e 25.6 25 0 23 0 26 9 27 270 20 20 1.0 00 00 g.a 93 122 359 37.0 :iso 440 440 525 57.2 627 666 685 731 74.4 744 744 744 74400 00 00 0.0 00 00 1.1 11 2.6 4.6 61 7!1 8.!I Ill 14A 17.2 21.6 232 263 263 27.3 27.3 273 273 273oo oo o.o oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo no 00 [).0 00 00 000.8 0 8 0.5 0.5 0 5 0 5 0.5 0 5 0 S 0 5 0 S O S O S O S O S 0 5 0 S 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 S 0 562 113 11.5 0.5 65 6.5 01 0.1 00 1.2 00 20 0.0 23 (l.O (10 OO O1 (10 00 OO i OO 02 o.a!1108.9 6107.1 S107.0 S119.1 9122.1 !1126.1 9125.6 6131).0 6137.5 5137.3 6136.5 S139.4 !1139.3 5147.0 !)150.1 5154.1 6161.1 6166.2 6167.8 §170.5 S170.5 S168.4 6176.5 6171.6 6167.5 Average Rate of Retum I.al% 1.3S% 10!1% 0.95% 0.S7% a.Sl'A a.SS% a.Sl)% 0.44!A O.SO% 0.49% 031% fl.Sl% (1.SD% 0.S7% rl.S?A O.64% 0.68% 0.711% OJ1% OJ7% 0.9S% 0.92% 1.03% I.IO% Monthly Portfolio
Allocation by Investment
Sector (5Millions)
s TriCoumiei Btnk
@ J@4ey Market
s cen:fiiitei ot DeHaiit
ffl ui Ttextunt Billi
!- Govetnmtnt Aginty Inveijmenti
N Sxn Majeo Conn§ Pool
a kaial Agency Inviitmint fund - Pooled
Investment Portfolio - Average Rate of Return
Sap-20 Apt-21 May-21 Aug-21 Ss>21 Api-22 Sep4?

34 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Jennifer Dianos, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Receive Written Update on the City’s Response Efforts to COVID-19 BACKGROUND: This report is to provide an update on the City’s response efforts to COVID- 19, while the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is activated. The information provided in this report is as of the time it was produced and may be subject to change.

DISCUSSION:

San Mateo County Health provides regular COVID-19 data dashboards through their website, smchealth.org. San Mateo County Health reports as of Oct. 27, 2022, there are a total of 325 cases within the last 30 days in the City of San Bruno and as of Oct. 26, 2022, approximately

94.7% of San Bruno residents are vaccinated. Additional statistics are attached to this report.

There are no City services or operational modifications to report to the City Council.

Since July 1, 2022, the City partnered with Curative to offer no out-of-pocket cost COVID-19 PCR testing to the San Bruno community. The EOC team worked to develop this partnership to provide a local resource to the community at a time when testing was limited and there was a high community interest. The City was recently notified by Curative that the testing kiosk, located at Narita Plaza, will close effective immediately. The City is currently working with Curative on the removal of the kiosk. Although testing will no longer be available at Narita Plaza, there are several other no out-of-pocket cost testing sites that are offered through San Mateo County. A full list of these sites is available at smcgov.org/Testing.

As we approach the winter season, the California Department of Public Health and San Mateo County Health recommend best practices to protect individuals and communities from the flu and COVID-19. Individuals are recommended to:
•Get the updated COVID-19 bivalent booster - visit myturn.ca.gov to find the closest pharmacy or clinic
•Wear a high-quality mask (N95, K95) in indoor public spaces, such as grocery stores •Maintain improved ventilation throughout indoor spaces when possible and avoid closed spaces with poor ventilation
•Stay home if you feel sick and get tested right away

35 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

FISCAL IMPACT: Since the declaration of emergency in March of 2020, the City of San Bruno has recorded the emergency expenditure of $200,120 out of the City’s emergency reserve funds for COVID related operations. In total, the City has recorded a total COVID related expenditure of $2.08 million including facilities enhancement projects (i.e. keyless entry system to City Hall), COVID-19 personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies, and initial response and adaptation to remote programming/services.

There are no additional expenditures to report for the specific period of this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: There is no environmental impact. The action is not a project subject to CEQA.  City Council’s action is not considered a “Project” per CEQA Guidelines and therefore no further environmental analysis is required.

RECOMMENDATION: Receive Written Update on the City’s Response Efforts to COVID-19 ALTERNATIVES: The City of San Bruno’s Emergency Operations Center remains activated and there are no alternatives proposed at this time.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. San Mateo County Health Department COVID-19 Data Dashboard

36 of 157

Source: https://www.smchealth.org/data-dashboards
(Dashboard screen shots taken on 11/3/2022 @ 9:10 a.m.) ATTACHMENT 1

37 of 157

Source: https://www.smchealth.org/data-dashboards
1 4
5 38 of 157

Source: https://www.smchealth.org/data-dashboards
1 4
5 39 of 157

Source: https://www.smchealth.org/data-dashboards
1 4
5 40 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Matthew Lee, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement With TJKM Transportation Consultants for Traffic Engineering Services on an As-Needed Basis in the Amount of $265,000
BACKGROUND: With a total street network of approximately 89 centerline miles, the City is responsible for the implementation and operation of all traffic control devices located within public right-of-way such as traffic signals, stop signs and pavement markings. As authorized by the San Bruno Municipal Code, the powers and duties of the traffic engineer consist of determining proper timing of traffic control devices, conducting engineering investigations of traffic conditions, and developing methods to improve traffic conditions.

The City has had a vacancy in the traffic engineering position since April 2020. Because of this, the City has had to utilize a consulting firm to provide as-needed traffic engineering services. In March 2020, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for consultants to perform as needed engineering services in the field of traffic engineering.

These services are overseen by the City Engineer, and include but are not limited to:
•Revising signal timing.
•Reviewing private development traffic impact analyses. •Updating and executing the City’s traffic calming program •Evaluating traffic safety and parking requests.
•Reviewing more complex traffic control plans.
•Reviewing traffic related capital improvement projects •Performing California Municipal Uniform Traffic Control Device warrant analyses. •Analyzing requests for additional or enhanced pedestrian crossings, •Representing the City on traffic engineering issues at community meetings The RFP was directly distributed to the on-call traffic engineering consultants and an evaluation of proposals was conducted based on the following criteria:
•Understanding and approach;
•Qualification and experience of the traffic engineer and firm; and •Qualifications related to traffic signal design, traffic studies and warrant analysis.

After evaluating the proposals, staff selected TJKM Transportation Consultants to serve in the role of consultant traffic engineer. Their proposal demonstrated a professional, well

41 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

3 4
2 qualified level of experience and expertise in traffic engineering. Furthermore, the firm’s engineer that would be serving as our consultant traffic engineer had recent experience serving as City Traffic Engineer at other Bay Area municipalities including the Cities of Mountain View and Santa Clara.

DISCUSSION: Beginning in fiscal year 2022-23, the position of traffic engineer was reclassified from Associate Civil Engineer to Senior Civil Engineer to be commensurate with the responsibilities and expectations of that position. The City is actively working to fill this position as quickly as possible. However, to be conservative at this time, the City anticipates the continued need to utilize TJKM on an as-needed basis. Since they started working with the City in 2020, TJKM has developed valuable institutional knowledge of the City’s network, policies and procedures. The cost for a consultant to provide traffic engineering services full time for one year is approximately $480,000 while a full-time, permanent in-house senior civil engineer performing that same service would have a fully burdened rate of approximately $185,000.

Salary savings from that vacant position is proposed to be utilized along with $80,000 from the Engineering Section’s operating budget which was allocated in the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budget for this purpose. The total not to exceed amount is $265,000 for this contract agreement.

This amount is sufficient for the consultant to provide professional traffic engineering services for approximately half time for one year.

FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will authorize $185,000 in salary savings and $80,000 from the approved Engineering Section’s operating budget for consultant services. Hourly rates for contract traffic engineering support is approximately $230 per hour. Certain services, such as those for reviewing private land development projects, are directly reimbursable by applicants through developer reimbursement agreements. Pass through costs will not be included in the agreement not to exceed amount as they would not affect the Engineering Section’s operating budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The action is not a project subject to CEQA. City Council’s action is not considered a “Project” per CEQA Guidelines and therefore no further environmental analysis is required.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with TJKM Transportation Consultants for traffic engineering Services on an as-needed basis in the amount of $265,000.

ALTERNATIVES: 1. Do not authorize award of this contract and defer all City-related traffic engineering services, except on private land development projects, until a qualified engineer can be retained.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution

42 of 157

RESOLUTION NO. 2022 - ___

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZE AN AGREEMENT

WITH TJKM TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $265,000 WHEREAS, the City is responsible for the implementation and operation of all traffic control devices located within public right of way; and WHEREAS, the City has been relying on a consultant traffic engineer to perform these services until a qualified engineer can be retained to provide these services in house; and WHEREAS, the City has been unable to attract and recruit qualified engineers to perform traffic engineering for the past two years since the departure of the previous engineer in April 2020; and
WHEREAS, the position of traffic engineer was reclassified to Senior Civil Engineer to be commensurate with the responsibilities and expectations of that position; and WHEREAS, despite that reclassification recruitment efforts continue to be unsuccessful; and
WHEREAS, in March 2020 the City issued a Request for Proposals for consultants to perform as-needed traffic engineering and TJKM Transportation Consultants was selected to serve in the role of consultant traffic engineer due to their level of experience and expertise in the field of traffic engineering; and
WHEREAS, the cost for a consultant to provide traffic engineering services full time for one year is approximately $480,000 while an in-house senior civil engineer performing that same service would have a fully burdened rate of approximately $185,000; and WHEREAS, with the continued need for traffic engineering support by the City, TJKM Transportation Consultants is recommended to continue serving in as-needed basis until the vacant engineer position can be filled; and
WHEREAS, salary savings in the amount of $185,000 from that vacant position is proposed to be utilized along with $80,000 from the Engineering Section’s operating budget for a total not to exceed amount of $265,000; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Bruno City Council authorizes the City Manager to authorize an agreement with TJKM Transportation Consultants for Traffic Engineering Services on an as-needed basis in an amount not to exceed $265,000.

Dated: November 8, 2022
-o0o-

43 of 157

2 5
0 9
I, Vicky Hasha, Deputy City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Bruno this 8th day of November 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

Vicky Hasha
Deputy City Clerk

44 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Darcy Smith, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Waive Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Amending Article III (Zoning) of Title 12 (Land Use) of the Municipal Code by Adding Chapter

12.265 (Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee) and Amending Chapter 12.260 (Development Impact Fee)
BACKGROUND: On October 25, 2022, the City Council held a Public Hearing to 1) introduce, read by title only, and waive further reading of an ordinance amending Article III (Zoning) of Title 12 (Land Use) of the Municipal Code by adding Chapter 12.265 (Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee) and amending Chapter 12.260 (Development Impact Fee); and 2) adopt a resolution setting the rate of the Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee.

The City Council voted 4-0, with one recusal, to introduce the ordinance and adopt the resolution.

The ordinance and resolution provide a comprehensive Area Development Impact Fee (“Area DIF”) program to implement the Bayhill Specific Plan, which was adopted by the City Council on September 28, 2021. This is a long-range planning document that establishes a regulatory framework for guiding private and public development within the Bayhill Specific Plan Planning Area over the next 20 years. The Bayhill Specific Plan Area comprises approximately 92.2 acres and is generally bounded by Interstate 280 to the west and 380 to the north, El Camino Real to the east (but exclusive of the properties fronting El Camino Real), and San Bruno Avenue West to the south from Interstate 280 to Elm Avenue.

DISCUSSION: The purpose of this consent item is to serve as a second reading and action for adoption of the ordinance. No changes have been made to this ordinance since its introduction. The ordinance is presented as Attachment 1.

As presented in the staff report on October 25, 2022, development impact fees are one-time charges on new development projects collected and used by the City to cover the cost of capital facilities and infrastructure needed to serve new development. The Bayhill ADIF program would be applicable to future development in the Plan Area only and will not replace or exempt development from paying other City fees, including the current city-wide Development Impact Fee. Impact Fees are regulated by (AB) 1600, the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000 et seq.). The City prepared a Nexus Study, which was presented to the City Council on October 25th. The Nexus Study provides the analysis to determine the maximum allowable fees that the City can charge for facilities and infrastructure consistent with the legal requirements of state law. These impact fees are required to be utilized for capital facility and infrastructure improvements only to fund facility needs created by new development rather than

45 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 2 of 5 ends

3 6
8 existing deficiencies. The fees are based on a rational nexus between new development and the costs of the capital facilities and infrastructure needed to accommodate such development.

Nexus Study and Capital Improvement Plan
The Nexus Study relies on a Bayhill Area DIF Capital Improvement Plan approved by the City Council in conjunction with the Bayhill Area DIF Program. The Capital Improvement Plan presented in the Nexus Study is derived from the infrastructure projects/capital improvements identified in the Bayhill Specific Plan Table 7-1, with some minor modifications. The Specific Plan identified these improvements as necessary to accommodate the level of service standards embodied therein or in the City’s General Plan as well as address mitigations identified through the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The list of improvements included in the Nexus Study reflect those included in the Specific Plan; however, the costs have been updated to reflect updated information provided by the Public Works Department and in consultation with transportation engineers from Fehr & Peers.

Consistent with the requirements of State law, the Area DIF calculation excludes the cost of infrastructure improvements that are necessary to address existing deficiencies and/or serve other areas of the city. Thus, this analysis does not include costs that are needed to address existing deficiencies or maintenance projects—only upgrades to expand system capacity.

Estimated total infrastructure hard and soft costs total $45.6 million, in February 2022 dollars.

Approximately 29 percent ($13,010,000) of the $45.6 million listed in the Bayhill Area DIF CIP have been allocated to new development in the Plan Area. In other words, 71 percent of the costs have been allocated to address either existing infrastructure needs and/or development elsewhere in the city.

Maximum Allowable and Recommended Area Development Impact Fees The following table provides the maximum allowable Bayhill ADIF supported by the nexus findings and analysis of the estimated costs of required capital infrastructure and facilities contained in the Nexus Study. These fees were adopted by Resolution on October 25, 2022.

The fee would be applied to all new office, retail, hotel, multifamily residential projects, and accessory dwelling units over 750 square feet in area within the Plan Area. The Specific Plan does not allow for single-family home development, so there is no fee for that land use.

Land Use Category Fee Amount/ Unit1
Office $6.17per sq.ft.Retail $32.46per sq.ft.Hotel $5,739per hotel roomMulti-Family ResidentialUnits equal to or less than 407 sq.ft. $3,524per unitUnits between 407-2,034 sq.ft. $8.66per sq.ft.Units equal to or greater than 2,034 sq.ft. $17,618per unit[1] Fee includes a 5% administrative charge to cover cost of implementing and administerting the Bayhill Area DIF Program.

46 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 3 of 5 ends

3 6
8 If implemented at the maximum levels shown above, the proposed impact fee program would generate revenue to cover nearly 29%, or approximately $13 Million, of the total capital facilities identified in the fee program. All fees are expressed in February 2022 dollars. The ordinance includes a provision to index these amounts annually based on the California Construction Cost Index for San Francisco, California published by the Engineer News Record (or any successor to such index) to account for inflation.

The Bayhill ADIF Program will be independent and in addition to all other City development impact fees that may also be applicable to the Plan Area, including the City-Wide Development Impact Fee. This is because the Bayhill Area DIF Program does not include the costs of any infrastructure projects that are included in the other development impact fee programs.

Ordinance Summary
A summary of the Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee Ordinance is provided below.

Fees Imposed: The Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee is imposed upon each development project in the Bayhill Specific Plan Area as a condition of development. The fee is imposed on the following development projects:
- Non-Residential Development Projects;
- Multi-family and ADU Residential Development Projects; and, - Mixed Residential and Non-Residential Development Projects.

Fees due at Building Permit Issuance: Developers are required to pay the Bayhill Area Development Impact Fees prior to the issuance of the building permit. The fee for a development project will be calculated at the rates in effect as of the date the fee is paid. The City will not issue a building permit for a development project unless the fee has been paid. For purposes of this Ordinance, a Building Permit is defined as, “A full structural building permit as well as partial permit such as foundation-only permits.”

Credit for Redevelopment: When a development project involves the demolition of an existing structure and its replacement with a new structure, the developer is entitled to credits against the fees. In order to qualify for a credit, the developer must demonstrate that the building was either occupied by a resident (for a residential building) or a business (for a non-residential building) during six of the twelve months prior to the date of a complete and adequate building permit application. The credit will be calculated for the fee that would be charged for the development of the structure to be demolished, calculated at the rate in effect on the date the fee is paid.

Annual Reporting: The City will comply with the public reporting requirements in Sections 660010 and 66006 of the California Government Code.

Appeals: The developer may submit an appeal to the City Manager if they believe the Area Development Impact Fees have been calculated incorrectly by the City or that the fee is not reasonably related to the impact of the developer’s project on the Bayhill Specific Plan Area facilities. The City Manager will have 30 days to respond to the appeal after it has been filed, either by determining that the original calculated amount was correct, or by determining that a revised amount should be due. If the City Manager determines that the correct fee is less than the amount already paid to the City, the City will refund to the Developer the amount of the

47 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 4 of 5 ends

3 6
8 overpayment. If the City Manager determines that the correct fee is greater than the amount already paid to the City, the developer will pay to the City the amount of the underpayment.

Annual Inflation Adjustment: Each July 1, beginning July 1, 2023, the rate of the Fee will be automatically adjusted to reflect the change in the California Construction Cost Index for San Francisco, California published by the Engineer News Record (or any successor to such index).

This is the standard index used for this purpose.

Development Impact Fee Administration: Once adopted, fees will start to be collected for new development projects within the Bayhill Specific Plan area. Fees will be deposited into a specific and separate account and tracked separately from other City revenues. The fees will be expended by the City to fund improvements to public infrastructure necessary to accommodate growth consistent with the Bayhill Specific Plan and level of service requirements.

Modifications to Chapter 12,260 (Development Impact Fees) The Ordinance also proposes specific amendments to Chapter 12.260 (Development Impact Fees) of the San Bruno Municipal Code. The proposed amendments, which are outlined below will ensure that Chapter 12.265 and Chapter 12.260 are consistent with one another.

Fees Imposed: Chapter 12.260.030 of the San Bruno Municipal Code will be amended to clarify that City-Wide Development Impact fees are imposed on the following development projects:
- Non-Residential Development Projects;
- Multi-family, Single-family, and ADU Residential Development Projects; and, - Mixed Residential and Non-Residential Development Projects.

Fees dues at Building Permit Issuance: Chapter 12.260.050(B) of the San Bruno Municipal Code will be amended by requiring the fees for a development project to be calculated at the rates in effect as of the date the fees are paid. Currently, Chapter 12.260.050(B) specifies that fees will be calculated at the rates in effect as of the date the developer submits a complete and adequate application for a building permit. Basing the fee calculation on the date the fees are paid is consistent with the methodology used to calculated other fees in the City’s Master Fee Schedule.

Credit for Redevelopment: Chapter 12.260.060 of the San Bruno Municipal Code will be amended to specify that each credit will be equal to the fee that would be charged for the development of the structure to be demolished, calculated at the rate in effect on the date the fees are paid. Currently, Chapter 12.260.060 specifies that each credit will be equal to the fee that would be charged for the development of the structure to be demolished, calculated at the rate in effect on the date the developer submits a complete and adequate application for the associated building permit.

Annual Report: Chapter 12.260.090 of the San Bruno Municipal Code will be amended to specify that the City will comply with the public reporting requirements in Section 66001 and 66006 of the California Government Code.

Annual Inflation Adjustment: Chapter 12.260.120 of the San Bruno Municipal Code will be amended to specify that each July 1, the rate of the Fee will be automatically adjusted to reflect

48 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 5 of 5 ends

3 6
8 the change in the California Construction Cost Index for San Francisco, California published by the Engineer News Record (or any successor to such index).

Bayhill Specific Plan ADIF Program: Chapter 12.260.130 of the San Bruno Municipal Code will be added to inform developers that the Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee Program applies separately from and in addition to the City-wide Development Impact Fees.

NEXT STEPS: Should the Council waive the second reading and adopt the ordinance, it would go into effect 30 days after adoption.

FISCAL IMPACT: If adopted, the Ordinance will allow City staff to begin assessing and collecting fees on development projects located within the Bayhill Specific Plan area. Per the Nexus Study, the fees collected to support the 17 Capital Improvement Projects in the Bayhill Specific Plan area are projected to generate approximately $13 Million of Area Development Impact Fee revenue. This represents approximately 29 percent of the total revenue required in order to implement all capital facilities listed in the nexus study. Because impact fees can only be collected to fund a portion of any particular capital improvement, they will not fully pay for all facility and infrastructure improvements. The City must therefore continue to seek other financing mechanisms, such as Federal, State, and Regional fund/grant opportunities, or allocation of General Fund revenues to fully fund these capital improvements.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Adoption of this ordinance is found to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act because the adoption of this Ordinance is not a project, in that it is a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4)), and because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the fees may have a significant effect on the environment, in that this ordinance contains no provisions modifying the physical design, development, or construction of residences or nonresidential structures CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)). The authorization for and adoption of the fee is also not a project because a project does not include the creation of a governmental funding mechanism that does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4).

RECOMMENDATION: Waive Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Amending Article III (Zoning) of Title 12 (Land Use) of the Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 12.265 (Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee) and Amending Chapter 12.260 (Development Impact Fee).

ALTERNATIVES: Direct staff to make modifications to the Ordinance; substantive modifications will require re-introduction at a subsequent meeting.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance

49 of 157

1 0
3 0
ORDINANCE NO. _______

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BRUNO ADDING CHAPTER 12.265 (BAYHILL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE) AND AMENDING CHAPTER 12.260 TO TITLE 12 (LAND USE) ARTICLE III (ZONING) OF THE

CITY OF SAN BRUNO MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION 1. City Council makes the following findings:

A.The Mitigation Fee Act contained in Government Code 66000 et seq., permits the City to impose development impact fees on new development for the purposes of funding the public facilities necessary to serve that new development.

B.The Bayhill Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council in 2021 and provides a land use and regulatory framework for redevelopment of the Bayhill Office Center and adjacent Bayhill Shopping Center for higher-intensity development.

C.The Bayhill Specific Plan identified improvements necessary to serve new development at the level of service standards embodied in the Specific Plan or in the City’s General Plan as well as to address mitigations identified in the Bayhill Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report.

D.New development in the Bayhill Specific Plan Area will increase the demand for public facilities to serve that Area.

E.A Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee Program can help to ensure that developers pay a “fair share” of the capital costs associated with the public facilities that are necessitated by or serve development projects in that Area.

F.The Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee Program will not fund costs attributable to existing deficiencies in public facilities, but can include the costs attributable to the increased demand for public facilities reasonably related to a development project in order to (1) refurbish existing facilities to maintain the existing level of service or (2) achieve an adopted level of service that is consistent with the General Plan.

G.The Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee Program will be independent and in addition to all other City, County, other agency, or regional development impact fees that may also be applicable to the Specific Plan Area.

H.The City Council finds that the impact fees and charges imposed by this Ordinance are necessary and reasonable to implement the goals and objectives of the City’s General Plan and the Bayhill Specific Plan and are permitted by California state law.

I.On October 25, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the City’s proposed new development fee at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to comment.

SECTION 2. Chapter 12.265 (Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee) is hereby added to Title 12 (Land Use) Article III (Zoning) of the San Bruno Municipal Code, to read as follows:

50 of 157

1 0
3 0
CHAPTER 12.265

BAYHILL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
Sections:

12.265.010 Purpose

12.265.020 Definitions

12.265.030 Fee Imposed

12.265.040 Rate

12.265.050 Payment

12.265.060 Credit for Redevelopment

12.265.070 Improvement Agreement

12.265.080 Special Fund

12.265.090 Appeals

12.235.100 Inflation Adjustment

12.265.010 Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to impose a fee upon development projects in the Bayhill Specific Plan Area to fund the costs of public facilities that are needed to serve demand created by those development projects. The amount of the fee will not include the costs attributable to demand generated by existing development.

12.265.020 Definitions
“Building Permit” means a full structural building permit as well as partial permits such as foundation-only permits.
“Certificate of occupancy” as used in this Chapter, has the same meaning as in California Government Code section 66007(e).
“Developer” means the owner of land that is to be developed as part of a Development Project; however, Developer does not include: (a) the City and or (b) the United States or any of its agencies, the State of California or any of its agencies, the California State University, the Regents of the University of California, a county, a county office of education, a city, a school district, community college district, or any other district, a public authority, or any other political subdivision or public corporation of the State of California. “Development Project” or “Project” means a development or redevelopment project that requires a building permit under this code.
“Fee” means a fee imposed pursuant to Section 12.265.030 of this chapter.

51 of 157

1 0
3 0

12.265.030 Fee Imposed
A. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee is hereby imposed upon the Developer of each Development Project in the Bayhill Specific Plan Area as a condition of development. The boundaries of the Bayhill Specific Plan Area are set forth and depicted in Figure 1-2 of the Bayhill Specific Plan.

B. The Fee is imposed on the following Development Projects:

1.Non-Residential Development Projects.
a. New construction of gross square feet of space for non-residential uses.
b. Construction that includes the conversion of existing non-residential building space from one land use category to a different land use category that would change from a fee category with a lower fee to a fee category with a higher fee. There is no fee if the change in use is from a higher to a lower fee Category. No credit is given if there is a negative impact fee amount.
c. Construction that adds additional square footage with the expansion or interior alteration of an existing non-residential structure.

For Development Projects that include multiple non-residential land use types, the fees are calculated for each specific land use based on the floor plans submitted for the building permit. The use type is determined by the primary use, not uses that are accessory to the primary use.

2.Residential Development Projects
a. New construction of one or more residential dwelling units. b. Construction that includes the conversion of existing non-residential building space to one or more residential dwelling units. c. Construction that adds one or more residential dwelling units with the expansion or interior alteration of an existing residential structure.

3.Mixed Residential and Non-Residential Development Projects. a. New construction of one or more residential dwelling units, or gross square feet of space for non-residential uses.

For Development Projects that include multiple land use types, the fees are calculated for each specific land use based on the floor plans submitted for the building permit.

Accessory Dwelling Units are subject to applicable Development Impact Fees as specified in Chapter 12.90.080(D).

12.265.040 Rate
The rate of the Fee shall be set by the City Council by ordinance or resolution. At the time it sets a rate, the City Council shall make each of the findings required by Section 66001(a) of the California Government Code.

52 of 157

1 0
3 0

12.265.050 Payment
A. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Fee required by this chapter shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Development Project. The City shall not issue a building permit for a Development Project unless the Fee has been paid.

B. Except as otherwise required by law, the Fee for a Development Project shall be calculated at the rates in effect as of the date the Fee is paid. A developer may pay all or a portion of the Fee owed at any time prior to issuance of the building permit, at the rate in effect at the time payment is made. For phased projects, the amount due shall be paid on a pro rata basis based on the ratio of the square footage, or housing units, of the phase being constructed to the entire square footage, or housing units, of the approved development, and each portion shall be paid prior to the issuance of any building permit for each phase.

C. If applicable state law does not permit the City to require payment of the Fee for a Development Project on the schedule set forth in Subdivision A of this section, then the Fee for that Development Project shall be paid on a lump sum basis for the entire Development Project at the earliest date that the City is permitted to require such payment under state law. If payment is to be made pursuant to this subdivision, the City shall not issue a building permit to the Developer until (i) the Developer and the City enter into a contract for delayed payment as authorized by Section 66007(c) of the California Government Code; (ii) such contract is recorded in the manner set forth in that Section; and (iii) unless the Developer is specifically exempt from such requirement under state law, the Developer posts a performance bond or a letter of credit from a federally insured, recognized depository institution to guarantee payment of the Fee.

12.265.060 Credit For Existing Development
Where the Development Project involves the demolition of an existing structure and its replacement with a new structure the Developer shall be entitled to credits against the Fee required by this chapter. A credit shall not be applied for any building or part of a building unless the Developer can establish, to the satisfaction of the City, that the building or part of building was either occupied by a resident (for a residential building) or occupied by a business that conducted actual business activities (for a non-residential building) during six of the twelve months prior to the date on which a complete and adequate building permit application for the Development is submitted. The credit shall be equal to the Fee that would be charged for the development of the structure to be demolished, calculated at the rate in effect on the date the Fee is paid. In no event shall the amount of the credit reduce the Fee for the Development Project below $0, and a credit may not be transferred to any other Development Project or used for any purpose other than offsetting Fee imposed pursuant to this chapter.

12.265.070 Improvement Agreement
A. The City may, but is not required to, enter into an Improvement Agreement with a Developer pursuant to which the Developer will construct, pursuant to City standards and requirements, one or more public improvements that would otherwise be eligible for funding with the proceeds of the Fee.

B. The credit amount shall be the engineering and construction costs that would be reasonably incurred by the City in building the public facility, and shall not exceed the amount set forth in the Improvement Agreement.

53 of 157

1 0
3 0
C. The credit will be available to the Developer only upon completion of the public improvement to the satisfaction of the City.

D. The Improvement Agreement must be approved by the City Council and may include any additional terms as the City Council finds to be necessary or useful.

12.265.080 Special Fund
A. A Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee Fund shall be created.

B. When the City receives payment of the Fee pursuant to this chapter, that payment shall be deposited in the fund established pursuant to this Section in a manner that avoids any commingling of the Fee with other revenues and funds of the City, except for temporary investments.

C. Any interest income earned by moneys in the fund established pursuant to this Section shall also be deposited in that fund.

D. Moneys in the Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee Fund shall be expended by the City to fund improvements to public infrastructure necessary to accommodate growth consistent with the Bayhill Specific Plan and level of service requirements described therein.

12.265.090 Annual Reporting
For each separate account or the fund established pursuant to Section 12.265.080, the city shall comply with the public reporting requirements in Sections 66001 and 66006 of the California Government Code.

12.265.100 Appeals
A. If a Developer believes that the City incorrectly calculated the Fee applied to such Developer’s Project or that the Fee is not reasonably related to the impact of the Developer’s Project on the Bayhill Specific Plan Area facilities, the Developer may apply to the City Manager for an adjustment to the Fee.

B. Any such appeal must be made in writing, and must include a proposed revised Fee amount and an explanation of why the proposed revision constitutes a correct application of the terms of this Chapter and of any resolutions or other actions of the City Council that set the rate of the Fee or that otherwise affect the Fee.

C. The written appeal must be filed no later than the later of (i) ten days after the date on which the Fee becomes due or (ii) ten days after the date on which the Fee is paid. An appeal may be filed prior to payment of the Fee; however, full payment of the Fee, as calculated by the City shall remain a precondition to building permit issuance or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the conduct of a final inspection (as applicable) unless and until the City Manager makes a determination that revises the amount of the Fee.

D. The City Manager shall have thirty days to respond to the appeal after it has been filed, either by determining that the original calculated amount was correct, or by determining that a revised amount should be due. The determination of the City Manager is the

54 of 157

1 0
3 0
final determination of the City. If the City Manager does not respond to the appeal within the thirty day period, the appeal shall be deemed finally rejected.

E. If the City Manager determines that the correct Fee is less than the amount already paid to the City, the City will refund to the Developer the amount of the overpayment. If the City Manager determines that the correct Fee is greater than the amount already paid to the City, the Developer shall pay to the City the amount of the underpayment.

F. This Section does not excuse the Developer from compliance with Chapter 9 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the California Government Code (beginning with Section 66020) with respect to any matter subject to that chapter of the Government Code.

12.265.100 Inflation Adjustment
Each July 1, beginning July 1, 2023, the rate of the Fee shall be automatically adjusted to reflect the change in the California Construction Cost Index for San Francisco, California published by the Engineer News Record (or any successor to such index) during the twelve months prior to the February proceeding that July 1. However, the City Council may, by resolution, prevent any such adjustment from taking effect.

SECTION 3. San Bruno Municipal Code Chapter 12.260 (Development Impact Fees) is amended as shown in underline for additions and strikethrough for deletions, as follows:

12.260.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to impose fees upon development projects that fully or partially offset the costs of public facilities that are needed to serve demand created by that development project. The amount of fees will not include the costs attributable to demand generated by existing development.

12.260.020 Definitions.
“Building permit” means a full structural building permit as well as partial permits such as foundation-only permits.
“Developer” means the owner of land that is to be developed as part of a development project; however, developer does not include: (1) the city and/or (2) with respect to any fee other than the Utilities Facilities Impact Fee, the United States or any of its agencies, the state of California or any of its agencies, the California State University, the Regents of the University of California, a county, a county office of education, a city, a school district, community college district, or any other district, a public authority, or any other political subdivision or public corporation of the state of California. “Development project” or “project” means a development or redevelopment project that requires a building permit under this code.
“Fee” means a fee imposed pursuant to Section 12.260.030 of this chapter.

55 of 157

1 0
3 0

12.260.030 Fees imposed.

A. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the following fees are hereby imposed upon the developer of each development project in the city as a condition of development:

Community Facilities Impact Fee;
Public Safety Facilities Impact Fee;
General Government Facilities Impact Fee;
Utilities Facilities Impact Fee;
Transportation Facilities Impact Fee.

B. The fee is imposed on the following Development Projects:

4.Non-Residential Development Projects.
a. New construction of gross square feet of space for non-residential uses.
b. Construction that includes the conversion of existing non-residential building space from one land use category to a different land use category that would change from a fee category with a lower fee to a fee category with a higher fee. There is no fee if the change in use is from a higher to a lower fee Category. No credit is given if there is a negative impact fee amount.
c. Construction that adds additional square footage added with the expansion or interior alteration of an existing non-residential structure.

5.Residential Development Projects
a. New construction of one or more residential dwelling units. b. Construction that includes the conversion of existing non-residential building space to one or more residential dwelling units. c. Construction that adds one or more residential dwelling units with the expansion or interior alteration of an existing residential structure.

6.Mixed Residential and Non-Residential Development Projects. a. New construction of one or more residential dwelling units, or gross square feet of space for non-residential uses.

56 of 157

1 0
3 0
For Development Projects that include multiple land use types, the fees are calculated for each specific land use based on the floor plans submitted for the building permit.

Accessory Dwelling Units are subject to applicable Development Impact Fees as specified in Chapter 12.90.080(D).

12.260.040 Rate.

The rate of each fee shall be set by the city council by ordinance or resolution. At the time it sets a rate, the city council shall make each of the findings required by Section 66001(a) of the California Government Code.

12.260.050 Payment.

A. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the fees required by this article shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for the development project. The city shall not issue a building permit for a development project unless the fees have been paid.

B. The fees for a development project shall be calculated at the rates in effect as of the date the fees are paiddeveloper submits a complete and adequate application for a building permit for the development project. A developer may pay all or a portion of the fee owed at any time prior to issuance of the building permit, at the rate in effect at the time payment is made.

For phased projects, the amount due shall be paid on a pro rata basis based on the ratio of the square footage, or housing units, of the phase being constructed to the entire square footage, or housing units, of the approved development, and each portion shall be paid prior to the issuance of any building permit for each phase.

C. If applicable state law does not permit the city to require payment of the fees for a development project on the schedule set forth in subsection A of this section, then the fees for that development project shall be paid on a lump sum basis for the entire development project at the earliest date that the city is permitted to require such payment under state law. If payment is to be made pursuant to this section, the city shall not issue a building permit to the developer until: (1) the developer and the city enter into a contract for delayed payment as authorized by Section 66007(c) of the California Government Code; (2) such contract is recorded in the manner set forth in that section; and (3) unless the developer is specifically exempt from such requirement under state law, the developer posts a performance bond or a letter of credit from a federally insured, recognized depository institution to guarantee payment of the fees.

12.260.060 Credit for redevelopment.

Where the development project involves the demolition of an existing structure and its replacement with a new structure, the developer shall be entitled to credits against the fees required by this chapter. A credit shall not be applied for any building or part of a building unless the developer can establish, to the satisfaction of the city, that the building or part of building was either occupied by a resident (for a residential building) or occupied by a business that conducted actual business activities (for a non-residential building) during six of the twelve months prior to the date on which a complete and adequate building permit application for the development is submitted. A credit shall be calculated separately for each of the five fees imposed pursuant to Section 12.260.030 of this chapter. Each credit shall be equal to the fee that would be charged for the development of the structure to be demolished, calculated at the

57 of 157

1 0
3 0
rate in effect on the date the fees are paid developer submits a complete and adequate application for his or her building permit. In no event shall the amount of the credit reduce any fee for the development project below zero dollars, and a credit may not be transferred to any other development project in the city, applied to any of the five fees other than the fee for which it was calculated or used for any purpose other than offsetting fees imposed pursuant to this chapter. For example, a credit calculated based on the rate for the Community Facilities Impact Fee may not be applied to any fee other than the Community Facilities Impact Fee.

12.260.070 Improvement agreement.

A. The city may, but is not required to, enter into an improvement agreement with a developer pursuant to which the developer will construct, pursuant to city standards and requirements, one or more public improvements that would otherwise be eligible for funding with the proceeds of a fee.

B. The credit amount shall be the engineering and construction costs that would be reasonably incurred by the city in building the public facility, and shall not exceed the amount set forth in the improvement agreement.

C. The credit will be available to the developer only upon completion of the public improvement to the satisfaction of the city.

D. The credit shall be applied first to the fee that would otherwise be eligible to fund the public improvement. For example, a credit awarded for construction of a transportation facility shall be applied first against the Transportation Facilities Impact Fee for the development project. If the amount of the credit exceeds the amount of the associated fee, the credit may be applied to other fees due against the development project pursuant to this chapter. When a credit is applied against some other fee, an amount equal to the credit shall be transferred by the city from the fund established pursuant to Section 12.260.080 of this chapter for the associated fee to the fund established pursuant to Section 12.260.080 for the fee to which the credit is applied. For example, if a fifty thousand dollar credit for a transportation facility is applied to a Public Safety Facilities Impact Fee, then fifty thousand dollars shall be transferred from the city’s Transportation Facilities Impact Fee Fund to the city’s Public Safety Facilities Impact Fee Fund.

E. The improvement agreement must be approved by the city council and may include any additional terms as the city council finds to be necessary or useful. (Ord. 1869 § 3, 2019)

12.260.080 Special funds.

A. The following accounts or funds shall be established:

Community Facilities Impact Fee Fund;
Public Safety Facilities Impact Fee Fund;
General Government Facilities Impact Fee Fund;

58 of 157

1 0
3 0
Utilities Facilities Impact Fee Fund;
Transportation Facilities Impact Fee Fund.

B. When the city receives payment of a fee pursuant to this chapter, that payment shall be deposited in the appropriate account or fund established pursuant to this section in a manner that avoids any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds of the city, except for temporary investments.

C. Any interest income earned by moneys in an account or fund established pursuant to this section shall also be deposited in that account or fund.

D. Moneys in the Community Facilities Impact Fee Fund shall be expended by the city only for parkland acquisition and library, park and recreation improvements.

E. Moneys in the Public Safety Facilities Impact Fee Fund shall be expended by the city only for police and fire capital facilities and equipment.

F. Moneys in the General Government Facilities Impact Fee Fund shall be expended by the city only for community facilities and equipment necessary to maintain general government functions.

G. Moneys in the Utilities Facilities Impact Fee Fund shall be expended by the city only for water, sewer, storm drainage, and telecommunications infrastructure and equipment.

H. Moneys in the Transportation Facilities Impact Fee Fund shall be expended by the city only for transportation infrastructure.

12.260.090 Annual Report
For each separate account or fund established pursuant to Section 12.260.080 of this chapter, the city shall comply with the public reporting requirements in Sections 66001 and 66006 of the California Government Code.

A. For each separate account or fund established pursuant to Section 12.260.080 of this chapter, the city shall, within one hundred eighty days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the information required by Section 66006(b)(1) of the California Government Code. The information may be included in the city’s Consolidated Annual Financial Report or any other report prepared by the city, and need not be isolated in a separate document.

B. The city council shall review the information made available to the public pursuant to subsection A of this section at the next regularly scheduled public meeting not less than fifteen days after this information is made available to the public.

C. Notice of the time and place of the meeting where the city council will review the information, including the address where the information may be reviewed, shall be mailed, at least fifteen days prior to the meeting, to any interested party who files a written request with the city clerk for mailed notice of the meeting. Any written request for mailed notices shall be valid

59 of 157

1 0
3 0
for one year from the date on which it is filed unless a renewal request is filed. Renewal requests for mailed notices shall be filed on or before April 1 of each year.

D. For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the accounts or funds established pursuant to Section 12.260.080 of this chapter, and every five years thereafter, the city council shall, in connection with its review conducted pursuant to subsection C of this section, make each of the findings required by Section 66001(d) of the California Government Code. (Ord. 1869 § 3, 2019)

12.260.100 Appeals.

A. If a developer believes that one or more of the fees applied to his or her project have been calculated incorrectly by the city, he or she may apply to the city manager for an adjustment to those fees.

B. Any such appeal must be made in writing, and must include a proposed revised fee amount and an explanation of why the proposed revision constitutes a correct application of the terms of this chapter and of any resolutions or other actions of the city council that set the rate of the fees or that otherwise affect the fees.

C. The written appeal must be filed no later than the later of: (1) ten days after the date on which the fee becomes due; or (2) ten days after the date on which the fee is paid. An appeal may be filed prior to payment of a fee; however, full payment of the fee, as calculated by the city shall remain a precondition to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the conduct of a final inspection (as applicable) unless and until the city manager makes a determination that revises the amount of the fees.

D. The city manager shall have thirty days to respond to the appeal after it had been filed, either by determining that the original calculated amount was correct, or by determining that a revised amount should be due. The determination of the city manager is the final determination of the city. If the city manager does not respond to the appeal within the thirty day period, the appeal shall be deemed finally rejected.

E. If the city manager determines that the correct fee is less than the amount already paid to the city, the city will refund to the developer the amount of the overpayment. If the city manager determines that the correct fee is greater than the amount already paid to the city, the developer shall pay to the city the amount of the underpayment.

F. The appeals process set forth in this section applies solely to the case where the developer believes that the city has incorrectly applied the fees according to the city’s ordinances, resolutions, city council actions, and regulations. It does not apply to any claim that any such approved ordinances, resolutions, actions or regulations exceed the authority of the city or violate state or federal law. This section does not excuse the developer from compliance with Chapter 9 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the California Government Code (beginning with Section 66020) with respect to any matter subject to that chapter of the Government Code.

60 of 157

1 0
3 0

12.260.110 Regulations.

The city manager may promulgate such interpretive regulations for the application of this chapter as he or she finds necessary or useful.

12.260.120 Inflation adjustment.

Each July 1, beginning July 1, 2020, each rate automatically adjusted to reflect the change in the California Construction Cost Index for San Francisco, California published by the Engineer News Record (or any successor to such index) during the twelve months prior to the February proceeding that July 1. However, the City Council may, by resolution, prevent any such adjustment from taking effect. However, any such adjustment shall take effect only if approved by the city council, by resolution, and shall take effect no earlier than sixty days following such approval.

12.260.130 Bayhill specific plan area development impact fee program.

The Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee Program applies separately from and in addition to the Fees set forth in this Chapter. The Bayhill Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee Program is set forth in Chapter 12.265 of Title 12 (Land Use) and applies to all Development Projects within the Bayhill Specific Plan Area.

SECTION 4. Adoption of this ordinance is found to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act because the adoption of this Ordinance is not a project, in that it is a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4)), and because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the fees may have a significant effect on the environment, in that this ordinance contains no provisions modifying the physical design, development, or construction of residences or nonresidential structures CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)). The authorization for and adoption of the fee is also not a project because a project does not include the creation of a governmental funding mechanism that does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4); the proposed ordinance commits no fees to any specific project.

SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of the ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it should have adopted the ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional.

SECTION 7. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to take other actions on behalf of City, which are not expressly and specifically reserved for the City Council, to implement and effectuate this ordinance. The City Clerk is directed to codify this ordinance in a manner which best reflects the legislative intent of the City Council in enacting this ordinance.

The City Clerk is directed to resolve any numbering conflicts accordingly.

SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall publish this ordinance in accordance with applicable law.

61 of 157

1 0
3 0
SECTION 9. Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from the date of its passage. This ordinance shall be published according to law.

__________________________________
ATTEST: Rico E. Medina, Mayor _________________________________
Vicky S. Hasha, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________________
Trisha A. Ortiz, Interim City Attorney
Richard Watson Gershon Law
--oOo--
I hereby certify that foregoing Ordinance No. _____
was introduced at a regular meeting of the San Bruno City Council on October 25, 2022 and adopted by the San Bruno City Council at a regular meeting on _______________, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

RECUSED: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

________________________________
Vicky S. Hasha, Deputy City Clerk

62 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Ann Mottola, Community Services Director
SUBJECT: Community Flea Market 2023
BACKGROUND: At the September 13, 2022, meeting of the City Council, Staff was directed to explore the resources necessary to restore the Community Flea Markets in calendar year 2023.

DISCUSSION: The Recreation and Senior Services Divisions program plans are based on budgeted resources, staffing levels, and facility availability. Staffing resources are a significant contributor to program planning as each program requires the work of Staff who shepherd a program from creation through implementation. The Recreation and Seniors Services Divisions currently consist of 5 FTE’s:
•3 Recreation Program Coordinators (the most recent hire began on October 17, 2022) •1 Food Services Coordinator
•1 Superintendent
•1 Supervisor (VACANT)
When the 2022-23 fiscal year program plan was developed, certain programs that were traditionally located in City Park or the former recreation center, including the Community Flea Market, were suspended due the Recreation and Aquatic Center construction’s impact to City Park and due to the staffing levels of the Divisions. As we move further from COVID, we have been mindful of restoring programs responsibly, balancing the work with Staff resources required to successfully manage these programs – and the Staff available.

Currently, the Recreation and Seniors Team does not have capacity to increase workload. The Senior Center is at 100% operations programmatically as compared to before COVID, even though it lost its long-time Supervisor due to retirement. The remaining Staff have redistributed workloads so they can support this vital operation.

Additionally, due to the Recreation and Aquatic Center construction’s impact to City Park, Community Services did not include in its program plan for FY 2022-23 the Community Flea Market. The work to relocate the event was beyond the capacity of what the current staffing level could accommodate in this calendar year.

However, a bit of relief is in sight as the newest Recreation Coordinator started working with the City on October 17, 2022. This position will allow Recreation to develop a City-run summer

63 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

camp program and several Community events including the Community Flea Market in September 2023. The actual program plan is contingent on Staffing requests that are part of the Recreation and Aquatic Center Implementation Plan, as the work of the Recreation Division will increase substantially in the next year as we prepare to open the new facility.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The action is not a project subject to CEQA.

RECOMMENDATION: Receive Report.

ALTERNATIVES: None.

ATTACHMENTS: None.

64 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Monica Walker, Human Resources Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Approving Publicly Available Pay Schedule Effective November 8, 2022, Pursuant to the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR)
BACKGROUND: Based on recent salary changes resulting from bargaining unit contracts approved by City Council, staff proposes to adopt a resolution approving the current salary schedule for public posting. Per CalPERS Circular Letter 200-00320 issued January 8, 2020 (Exhibit A), the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) require employees to be paid pursuant to a publicly available pay schedule that meets the requirements of CCR Section 570.5(a) to qualify as both compensation earnable and pensionable compensation that is reportable to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS).

While the City has historically met all requirements for publication of pay schedules, action to adopt a single unified pay schedule is required by the CalPERS Circular Letter. Adoption of the unified pay schedule does not affect the salary or compensation paid to any City employee, but merely restates pay rates that have already been approved by the City Council at public meetings.

DISCUSSION: At this time, changes to the salary schedule are needed to reflect recent salary changes for the San Bruno Management Employees Association (SBMEA), City Manager, and Assistant City Manager job classifications. City Council approved salary increases for the SBMEA bargaining unit and the City Manager job classification during the regular City Council meeting on October 11, 2022. In addition, during closed session on October 4, 2022, City Council approved salary increases to the Assistant City Manager classification in the amounts of 6% effective the first full pay period in January 2022, and 3% effective the first full pay period in January 2023.

There are eight (8) requirements that must be met by a publicly available pay schedule for it to be used to determine pay rates per the CalPERS Circular Letter:
1) Be duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws.
2) Identify the position title for every employee position. 3) Show the pay rate as a single amount or multiple amounts within a range for each identified

65 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
October 25, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

1 0
6 4
position.
4) Indicate the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi- weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually.
5) Be posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's website. 6) Indicate an effective date and date of any revisions. 7) Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years. 8) Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay rate.

Historically, the City of San Bruno has consistently met all requirements for publicly available pay schedules. A compliant salary schedule is retained for at least five years, posted on the City’s website, and available for public inspection in the Human Resources Department.

The City’s governing body (City Council) has approved every tentative agreement or side letter containing salary increases that arise from negotiations with the City’s various bargaining units.

Subsequently, City Council grants approval of a “single document” salary schedule as required by CalPERS. Going forward, each time there is an action to delete or add a classification or change the salary range for any position on the salary schedule, the City will include the authorization to amend the unified salary schedule when the City Council approved the change to any salary range or classification.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact connected to this action to update and republish the publicly available Pay Schedule pursuant to the Public Employee’s Retirement Law, Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: There is no environmental impact.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution Approving Publicly Available Pay Schedule Effective November 8, 2022, Pursuant to the Public Employee’s Retirement Law (PERL), Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR).

ALTERNATIVES: Do not adopt a publicly available pay schedule pursuant to the Public Employees’ Retirement Law and risk potential penalties.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Salary Schedule

3. CalPERS Circular Letter 200-00320

66 of 157

RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BRUNO APPROVING PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 8, 2022, PURSUANT TO THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT LAW (PERL), PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ PENSION REFORM ACT OF 2013 (PEPRA), AND TITLE 2 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR)

WHEREAS, the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) require employee pay rates to be paid pursuant to a publicly available pay schedule that meets the requirements of CCR Section 570.5(a) to qualify as both compensation earnable and pensionable compensation that is reportable to CalPERS; and

WHEREAS, publicly available pay schedules must be duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws; and,

WHEREAS, publicly available pay schedules must identify the position title for every employee position; and

WHEREAS, publicly available pay schedules must show the pay rate as a single amount or multiple amounts within a range for each identified position; and

WHEREAS, publicly available pay schedules must indicate the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually; and

WHEREAS, publicly available pay schedules must be posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's website; and

WHEREAS, publicly available pay schedules must indicate an effective date and date of any revisions; and

WHEREAS, publicly available pay schedules must be retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years; and

WHEREAS, publicly available pay schedules must not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay rate; and

WHEREAS, the City of San Bruno has historically adopted publicly available pay schedules that conform with state law, and that adoption of a unified pay schedule per CalPERS Circular Letter 20000320 will not change the salary or compensation of any City employee.

67 of 157

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the San Bruno City Council hereby approves the Publicly Available Pay Schedule Effective November 8, 2022 (Attachment 2) Pursuant to the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) attached as Exhibit A.

---oOo---

I hereby certify that foregoing Resolution No. 2022 -
was introduced and adopted by the San Bruno City Council at a regular meeting on November 8, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

_________________________________
Vicky Hasha
Deputy City Clerk

68 of 157

CITY MANAGER Exempt (By Contract) Effective 07/01/2022 23,669 CITY ATTORNEY Exempt (By Contract) Effective 02/07/2021 20,031

CLASSIFICATION BARGAINING UNIT EFFECTIVE DATE Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 ACCOUNTANT Mid-Management 01/03/22 6,955 7,320 7,705 8,109 8,535 ACCOUNTING & CUSTOMER SERVICE REP I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 4,705 4,952 5,212 5,486 5,774 ACCOUNTING & CUSTOMER SERVICE REP II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,409 5,693 5,992 6,307 6,638 ACCOUNTING & CUSTOMER SERVICE REP III Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,222 6,549 6,893 7,255 7,636 ACCOUNTING MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,868 10,386 10,931 11,505 12,109 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Exempt (Management Benefits) 01/03/22 16,349 17,207 18,110 19,061 20,062 ASSISTANT ENGINEER Mid-Management 01/03/22 8,066 8,489 8,935 9,404 9,898 ASSISTANT PLANNER Mid-Management 01/03/22 6,686 7,037 7,406 7,795 8,204 ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER Exempt (Mid-Management Benefits) 01/03/22 9,868 10,386 10,931 11,505 12,109 ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,276 9,763 10,276 10,815 11,383 ASSOCIATE PLANNER Mid-Management 01/03/22 7,688 8,092 8,516 8,963 9,434 BUILDING INSPECTOR I Mid-Management 01/03/22 6,853 7,212 7,591 7,990 8,409 BUILDING INSPECTOR II Mid-Management 01/03/22 7,688 8,092 8,516 8,963 9,434 CATV BUSINESS MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,868 10,386 10,931 11,505 12,109 CATV DIRECTOR (CITYNET SERVICES DIRECTOR) Management 01/03/22 15,567 16,384 17,244 18,149 19,102 CATV HEADEND TECHNICIAN Miscellaneous 01/03/22 7,191 7,569 7,966 8,384 8,824 MEDIA MANAGER (FORMERLY CATV PROGRAMMING TECHNOLOGY MANAGER) Mid-Management 01/03/22 8,071 8,495 8,941 9,410 9,904 CATV SYSTEM ENGINEER Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,868 10,386 10,931 11,505 12,109 CATV TECHNICIAN I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,162 6,485 6,825 7,183 7,560 CATV TECHNICIAN II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,347 6,680 7,031 7,400 7,788 CATV TECHNICIAN III Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,538 6,881 7,242 7,622 8,022 CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL Mid-Management 01/03/22 10,737 11,301 11,894 12,519 13,176 CITY CLERK Exempt (Mid-Management Benefits) 01/03/22 9,581 10,084 10,613 11,170 11,756 CITYNET SERVICES TECHNICAL MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,216 9,700 10,209 10,745 11,309 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I Police 01/03/22 6,401 6,737 7,091 7,463 7,855 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II Police 01/03/22 7,041 7,411 7,800 8,209 8,640 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Management 01/03/22 14,890 15,672 16,495 17,361 18,272 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICIAN I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,517 5,807 6,112 6,433 6,771 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICIAN II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,347 6,680 7,031 7,400 7,788 COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR Management 01/03/22 15,265 16,066 16,909 17,797 18,731 COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER Police 01/03/22 4,782 5,033 5,297 5,575 5,868 COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,746 10,257 10,796 11,362 11,959 COMPUTER SUPPORT TECHNICIAN Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,319 6,651 7,000 7,368 7,755 CUSTODIAN Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,029 5,293 5,571 5,864 6,172 CUSTODIAN LEAD Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,784 6,088 6,408 6,744 7,098 DEPUTY CITY CLERK Exempt (Miscellaneous Benefits) 01/03/22 6,062 6,380 6,715 7,068 7,439 DEPUTY DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY SERVICES Mid-Management 01/03/22 11,233 11,822 12,443 13,096 13,784 DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIR - PW Admin & Engineering Mid-Management 01/03/22 12,702 13,369 14,071 14,810 15,587 DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIR - PW Utilities & Operations Mid-Management 01/03/22 11,557 12,164 12,802 13,475 14,182 DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIR - PW Utilities & Operations with PE Mid-Management 01/03/22 12,702 13,369 14,071 14,810 15,587 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Exempt (Mid-Management Benefits) 01/03/22 9,868 10,386 10,931 11,505 12,109 ENGINEER TECH/PW INSPECTOR Miscellaneous 01/03/22 7,240 7,620 8,020 8,441 8,884 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,945 6,257 6,585 6,931 7,295 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER Exempt (Miscellaneous Benefits) 01/03/22 6,676 7,026 7,395 7,783 8,192 FACILITIES TECH l Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,517 5,807 6,112 6,433 6,771 FIELD SUPERVISOR Mid-Management 01/03/22 7,151 7,526 7,921 8,337 8,775 FIELD SUPERVISOR - CATV Mid-Management 01/03/22 7,151 7,526 7,921 8,337 8,775 FIELD SUPERVISOR - PARKS Mid-Management 01/03/22 7,151 7,526 7,921 8,337 8,775 FINANCE DIRECTOR Management 01/03/22 14,890 15,672 16,495 17,361 18,272 FINANCIAL SERVICES MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,868 10,386 10,931 11,505 12,109 FINANCIAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR Mid-Management 01/03/22 7,976 8,394 8,835 9,299 9,787 FIRE BATTALION CHIEF Public Safety Mid-Management 01/03/22 13,274 13,971 14,704 15,476 16,289 FIRE CAPTAIN Fire 01/03/22 10,294 10,834 11,403 12,002 12,632 FIRE CHIEF Management 01/03/22 16,314 17,171 18,072 19,021 20,020 FIRE INSPECTOR Fire 01/03/22 7,869 8,282 8,717 9,175 9,657 FIREFIGHTER Fire 01/03/22 8,507 8,954 9,424 9,919 10,440 FIREFIGHTER RECRUIT Fire 01/03/22 7,656 - - - - FACILITIES TECH II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,347 6,680 7,031 7,400 7,788 FOOD SERVICES COORDINATOR Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,824 6,130 6,452 6,791 7,148 HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR Management 01/03/22 14,890 15,672 16,495 17,361 18,272 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER Exempt (Mid-Management Benefits) 01/03/22 9,868 10,386 10,931 11,505 12,109 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATE Mid-Management 01/03/22 7,338 7,724 8,129 8,556 9,005 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 10,253 10,792 11,358 11,954 12,582 LEAD CUSTOMER SERVICE & TECH SUPPORT REP Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,969 7,335 7,720 8,125 8,552 LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,347 6,680 7,031 7,400 7,788 LEAD WATER SYSTEM OPERATOR - PUMPS Miscellaneous 01/03/22 7,402 7,791 8,200 8,631 9,084 LEAD WATER SYSTEMS OPERATOR - FIELD Miscellaneous 01/03/22 7,402 7,791 8,200 8,631 9,084 LEAD WATER SYSTEMS OPERATOR - WELLS Miscellaneous 01/03/22 7,402 7,791 8,200 8,631 9,084 LEGAL SECRETARY Exempt (Miscellaneous Benefits) 01/03/22 6,676 7,026 7,395 7,783 8,192 LIBRARIAN I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,788 6,092 6,412 6,749 7,103 LIBRARIAN II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,656 7,005 7,373 7,760 8,167 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 4,405 4,636 4,879 5,135 5,405 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,066 5,332 5,612 5,907 6,217 LIBRARY SERVICES COORDINATOR Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,824 6,130 6,452 6,791 7,148 LIBRARY SERVICES MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,032 9,506 10,005 10,530 11,083 MAINTENANCE SERVICES MANAGER SERIES Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,216 9,700 10,209 10,745 11,309 MAINTENANCE WORKER I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 4,797 5,049 5,314 5,593 5,887 MAINTENANCE WORKER II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,517 5,807 6,112 6,433 6,771 MANAGEMENT ANALYST I Mid-Management (HR - Exempt Mid-Management Benefits) 01/03/22 6,918 7,281 7,663 8,065 8,488 MANAGEMENT ANALYST II Mid-Management (HR - Exempt Mid-Management Benefits) 01/03/22 7,953 8,371 8,810 9,273 9,760 MECHANIC I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,517 5,807 6,112 6,433 6,771 MECHANIC II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,347 6,680 7,031 7,400 7,788 NUTRITION PROGRAM MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 7,151 7,526 7,921 8,337 8,775 PARKS AND FACILITIES MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,334 9,824 10,340 10,883 11,454 PARKS MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,517 5,807 6,112 6,433 6,771

CITY OF SAN BRUNO MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022-xx OCTOBER 25, 2022

69 of 157

CLASSIFICATION BARGAINING UNIT EFFECTIVE DATE Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 PARKS MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,347 6,680 7,031 7,400 7,788 PLANNING AND HOUSING MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 10,058 10,586 11,141 11,726 12,342 POLICE CAPTAIN Public Safety Mid-Management 01/03/22 14,850 15,630 16,451 17,315 18,224 POLICE CHIEF Management 01/03/22 16,314 17,171 18,072 19,021 20,020 POLICE CLERK I Police 01/03/22 5,133 5,403 5,687 5,986 6,300 POLICE CLERK II Police 01/03/22 5,648 5,944 6,256 6,584 6,930 POLICE COMMUNICATIONS & RECORDS SUPERVISOR Mid-Management 01/03/22 10,082 10,611 11,169 11,755 12,372 POLICE CORPORAL Police 01/03/22 9,203 9,686 10,195 10,730 11,293 POLICE LIEUTENANT Public Safety Mid-Management 01/03/22 13,076 13,762 14,485 15,245 16,045 POLICE OFFICER Police 01/03/22 8,561 9,010 9,483 9,981 10,505 POLICE RECRUIT Police 01/03/22 7,705 - - - - POLICE SERGEANT Public Safety Mid-Management 01/03/22 10,543 11,097 11,680 12,293 12,938 PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER Mid-Management 01/03/22 11,165 11,751 12,368 13,018 13,701 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER I Police 01/03/22 6,695 7,047 7,417 7,806 8,216 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER II Police 01/03/22 7,363 7,750 8,157 8,585 9,036 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Management 01/03/22 15,567 16,384 17,244 18,149 19,102 PUMP MECHANIC I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,517 5,807 6,112 6,433 6,771 PUMP MECHANIC II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,347 6,680 7,031 7,400 7,788 RECREATION SERVICES COORDINATOR Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,824 6,130 6,452 6,791 7,148 RECREATION SERVICES MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 8,279 8,713 9,171 9,652 10,159 RECREATION SERVICES SUPERVISOR Mid-Management 01/03/22 7,151 7,526 7,921 8,337 8,775 SECRETARY Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,403 5,687 5,986 6,300 6,631 SENIOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Police 01/03/22 7,924 8,340 8,778 9,239 9,724 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER Mid-Management 01/03/22 10,221 10,757 11,322 11,916 12,542 SENIOR PLANNER Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,094 9,571 10,074 10,602 11,159 SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR Mid-Management 01/03/22 8,228 8,660 9,115 9,593 10,097 WAREHOUSE CLERK Miscellaneous 01/03/22 4,797 5,049 5,314 5,593 5,887 WATER FIELD SERVICE SUPERVISOR Mid-Management 01/03/22 8,513 8,960 9,431 9,926 10,447 WATER QUALITY & PRODUCTION SUPERVISOR Mid-Management 01/03/22 8,513 8,960 9,431 9,926 10,447 WATER QUALITY TECHNICIAN I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,517 5,807 6,112 6,433 6,771 WATER QUALITY TECHNICIAN II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,347 6,680 7,031 7,400 7,788 WATER SYSTEM & CONSERVATION MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 8,958 9,428 9,923 10,444 10,992 WATER SYSTEMS MANAGER Mid-Management 01/03/22 9,790 10,304 10,845 11,415 12,014 WATER SYSTEMS OPERATOR I Miscellaneous 01/03/22 5,629 5,924 6,235 6,562 6,907 WATER SYSTEMS OPERATOR II Miscellaneous 01/03/22 6,437 6,775 7,131 7,505 7,899

70 of 157

California Public Employees’ Retirement System
P.O. Box 942715 | Sacramento, CA 94229-2715
888 CalPERS (or 888-225-7377) | TTY: (877) 249-7442
www.calpers.ca.gov
Payroll
Circular Letter
January 8, 2020
Circular Letter: 200-003-20
Distribution: IV, VI, X, XII, XVI
To: All CalPERS Contracted Agencies (Public Agency, Schools, and State) Subject: Statutory and Regulatory Requirements for Publicly Available Pay Schedules Purpose
The purpose of this Circular Letter is to inform all CalPERS Contracted Agencies of the requirements for providing CalPERS with a Publicly Available Pay Schedule in compliance with the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR).

Purpose of Publicly Available Pay Schedules
Under the PERL and PEPRA, compensation earnable and pensionable compensation are determined in accordance with amounts identified on publicly available pay schedules.

Compensation Earnable
Under Government (Gov.) Code sections 20636 and 20636.1, compensation earnable means the pay rate and special compensation of the member, as further defined by those statutes.

Pay rate for contracting agency and school members is deemed the normal monthly rate of pay or base pay of the member paid in cash to similarly situated members of the same group or class of employment for services rendered on a full-time basis during normal working hours, pursuant to publicly available pay schedules. Pay rate for contracting agency and school members who are not in a group or class is deemed the monthly rate of pay or base pay of the member, paid in cash and pursuant to publicly available pay schedules, for services rendered on a full-time basis during normal working hours, subject to specified limitations.

71 of 157

Circular Letter: 200-003-20
January 8, 2020

Page 2 of 4 ends

Pay rate for state members is deemed the average monthly remuneration paid in cash out of funds paid by the employer to similarly situated members of the same group or class of employment, in payment for the member’s services or for time during which the member is excused from work, as further specified by subdivision (g) of Gov. Code 20636, pursuant to publicly available pay schedules.

Pensionable Compensation
Pursuant to Gov. Code section 7522.34, pensionable compensation of a new member of any public retirement system means the normal monthly rate of pay or base pay of the member paid in cash to similarly situated members of the same group or class of employment for services rendered on a full-time basis during normal working hours, pursuant to publicly available pay schedules, subject to specified limitations.

Requirements of Publicly Available Pay Schedules
Subdivision (a) of CCR section 570.5 defines the requirements for a publicly available pay schedule used to determine pay rates.

Pay rates shall be limited to the amount listed on a pay schedule that must meet all the following eight (8) requirements:

1. Be duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws

2. Identify the position title for every employee position

3. Show the pay rate as a single amount or multiple amounts within a range for each identified position

4. Indicate the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually

5. Be posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's website

6. Indicate an effective date and date of any revisions

7. Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years

8. Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay rate Here is an example of a compliant pay schedule, to the extent it has been duly approved and adopted by the employer’s governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meeting laws, it is posted on the employer’s website, and it is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years:

72 of 157

Circular Letter: 200-003-20
January 8, 2020

Page 3 of 4 ends

Classification Rate Type Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 City Manager Monthly $10,500 $11,000 $11,500 $12,000 $12,500 City Counsel Monthly $10,000 $10,500 $11,000 $11,500 $12,000 City Clerk Monthly $5,500 $6,000 $6,500 $7,000 $7,500
Call Center Representative Monthly $5,000 $5,500 $6,000 $6,500 $7,000 Analyst Monthly $5,000 $5,500 $6,000 $6,500 $7,000
Assistant Monthly $4,500 $5,000 $5,500 $6,000 $6,500
Revised as of 09/01/2017 and adopted by the Board as of 09/15/2017 City of CalPERS
Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 17-18
Effective as of 07/01/2017
Special Compensation
Pursuant to CCR section 571 for classic members, and CCR section 571.1 for new members under PEPRA, special compensation items are defined under an exclusive list. Each special compensation item shall be reported separately from pay rate, in accordance with the criteria described in those regulations. Therefore, a publicly available pay schedule in which the special compensation items are reflected in the pay rates does not comply with CCR section 570.5.

Absence of Publicly Available Pay Schedule
If an employer fails to meet the requirements of subdivision (a) of CCR section 570.5, under subdivision (b), the board may determine in its sole discretion an amount that will be considered as pay rate, taking into consideration all information it deems relevant including, but not limited to, the following:
• Documents approved by the employer’s governing body in accordance with requirements of public meeting laws and maintained by the employer
• Last pay rate listed on a pay schedule that conforms to the requirements of subdivision (a) with the same employer for the position at issue
• Last pay rate for the member that is listed on a pay schedule that conforms with the requirements of subdivision (a) with the same employer for a different position • Last pay rate for the member in a position that was held by the member and that is listed on a pay schedule that conforms to the requirements of subdivision (a) of a former CalPERS employer.

Importance of Publicly Available Pay Schedule
Publicly available pay schedules are required by CalPERS and are a critical component to verify all members’ pay rates when calculating members’ retirement benefits. Maintaining a compliant publicly available pay schedule will support transparency and expedite CalPERS’ review process.

73 of 157

Circular Letter: 200-003-20
January 8, 2020

Page 4 of 4 ends

Failure to provide CalPERS with a compliant publicly available pay schedule may result in a retirement benefit being delayed.

Questions
It is the employer’s responsibility to comply with all terms and conditions set forth in the employer’s contract with CalPERS and to ensure all reportable information is compliant with the PERL, PEPRA, and the CCR.

If you have any questions or concerns, contact the CalPERS Customer Contact Center at 888 CalPERS (or 888-225-7377), or email [email protected].

R
enee Ostrander, Chief
Employer Account Management Division

74 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Matthew Lee, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement With Wilsey Ham for Design Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $233,740 for the 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project (Project Number 60018)
BACKGROUND: The City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the Pavement Management Program (PMP) to repair and apply preventative maintenance treatment to local, collector, and arterial streets. As part of the PMP, the condition of City streets is routinely assessed and recommendations are made on the streets to be selected for rehabilitation to cost effectively maximize pavement longevity. Street condition is measured in terms of pavement condition index (PCI), a numerical index between 0 and 100 in which 0 represents a failed street and 100 represents a newly paved street. The City has a current average Citywide PCI of 62.

Senate Bill 1 (SB1), also referred to as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, increased the per gallon fuel excise taxes and vehicle registration fees to fund road maintenance and rehabilitation projects on local streets and roads systems.

In order to receive the SB1 funding, the City is required to submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a list of projects proposed to be funded with the SB1 funds and adopt those projects by resolution at a regular public meeting. City Council adopted a list of projects in previous fiscal years to be funded by SB1.

City Council Adoption
Date Street Begin End
April 24, 2018 EASTBURN CT WHITMAN WY CUL-DE-SAC
April 24, 2018 MILLS AVE KAINS AVE SAN BRUNO
AVE
April 24, 2018 SANTA HELENA AVE SAN ANTONIO AVE EL CAMINO REAL
April 9, 2019 POPLAR AVE CRYSTAL SPRINGS
AVE
ALLEN

ELEMENTAR
Y
April 14, 2020 BAYSHORE CIRCLE
(WB)

HUNTINGTON AVE
(EAST)
HERMAN
STREET

75 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 2 of 3 ends

3 8
5 City Council Adoption
Date Street Begin End
April 14, 2020 DARBY PLACE CRESTMOOR DR END
April 14, 2020 OXFORD LN NORTH END SOUTH END
June 22, 2021 MONTGOMERY AVE WALNUT ST SCOTT ST
June 22, 2021 PARKVIEW CT PARKVIEW DR END
Project locations and limits on the City’s 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project consist of the streets listed above. The listed streets are in failed condition with PCIs less than 25.

Core sampling and deflection testing to develop design recommendations are currently in progress by Pavement Engineering, Inc. and scheduled to be complete during Winter 2022-

23. The 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project will evaluate the listed streets above and prioritize design and pavement construction to fit into this fiscal year’s budget. Streets that will not be included in this fiscal year’s design, will be considered in subsequent paving projects based on available budget.

DISCUSSION: In February 2022, the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for on- call engineering services. In the response to the RFQ, Wilsey Ham submitted a Statement of Qualifications. Staff conducted an evaluation and determined Wilsey Ham was qualified to be placed on the City’s on-call list for engineering services based on the firm’s understanding of the scope of services, qualifications and experience of the project manager(s) and team, qualifications relating to engineering services, and experience with design and construction of CIP projects.

In October 2022 at the request of staff, Wilsey Ham provided a proposal for professional engineering design services for the 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project. The scope of work consisted of providing pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction recommendations based on the findings of the pavement evaluation, preparing construction bid documents, and providing design support services during construction. Design completion is expected summer 2023.

The 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project will replace portions of existing pavement. The methods will be selected based on the findings of the pavement evaluation currently in progress. The installation of accessible curb ramps within project limits will be included in this project.

FISCAL IMPACT: The 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project (project number 60018) is within the approved FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program. The agreement with Wilsey Ham is for a not to exceed amount of $233,740 and within the total project budget of $3,183,430 available in the current fiscal year. The total estimated costs for the project are provided below.

76 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

3 8
5 Total estimated cost for the project:

Design Consultant $ 233,740
Estimated Staff Management for Design $ 25,000 Estimated Construction Contract $ 2,300,000 Estimated Constructed Management and
Inspection $ 270,000
Contingency (15%) $ 345,000
Total Current Estimate: $ 3,173,740
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: This project falls withing the Categorical Exemption set forth in CEQA guidelines, Section 15302, which exempts the replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced, including but not limited to replacement or reconstruction of existing facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement for consultant design services with Wilsey Ham for the 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project in an amount not to exceed $233,740.

ALTERNATIVES: Do not adopt resolution authorizing execution of agreement, and request staff to issue a new request for proposals. This action would result in the delay the design of this project and furthering the delay the reconstruction of the streets within this project.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. CIP Budget

77 of 157

1 0
6 8
RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ____

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMEMENT

WITH WILSEY HAM FOR DESIGN SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $233,740 FOR THE 2021-22 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (PROJECT NUMBER 60018)
WHEREAS, the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the Pavement Management Program (PMP) to repair and apply preventative maintenance treatment to local, collector, and arterial streets; and
WHEREAS, in order to receive the SB1 funding, the City is required to submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a list of projects proposed to be funded with the SB1 funds and adopt those projects by resolution at a regular public meeting; and WHEREAS, City Council adopted a list of projects in previous fiscal years to be funded by SB1; and
WHEREAS, project locations and limits on the City’s 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project consists of the streets to be funded by SB1; and WHEREAS, in February 2022, the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for on-call engineering services; and
WHEREAS, in the response to the RFQ, Wilsey Ham submitted a Statement of Qualifications; and
WHEREAS, staff conducted an evaluation and determined Wilsey Ham was qualified to be placed on the City’s on-call list for engineering services based on the firm’s understanding of the scope of services, qualifications and experience of the project manager(s) and team, qualifications relating to engineering services, and experience with design and construction of CIP projects; and
WHEREAS, in October 2022 at the request of staff, Wilsey Ham provided a proposal for professional engineering design and construction support services for the 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project; and
WHEREAS, the scope of work consists of providing pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction recommendations based on the findings of the pavement evaluation, preparing construction bid documents, and providing design support services during construction; and
WHEREAS, the 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project will replace portions of existing pavement and methods will be selected based on the findings of the pavement evaluation currently in progress; and
WHEREAS, the 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project is within the approved FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program; and

78 of 157

1 0
6 8
WHEREAS, adequate project budget is available to fund the agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Bruno City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Wilsey Ham for Design Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $233,740 for the 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project (Project Number 60018).

Dated: November 8, 2022
ATTEST:

Vicky Hasha, Deputy City Clerk
-o0o-
I, Vicky Hasha, Deputy City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Bruno this 8th day of November 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT: Councilmembers:

79 of 157

PROJECT #: 60018 Total Project Budget: 3,255,329$
DEPARTMENT: Public Works Total

FUNDING SOURCES
Prior
Appropriations
Estimated
Carryover New Request
Total
Appropriations FY2023-24 FY2024-25 FY2025-26 FY2026-27
FY2023-27
Budget
Gas Tax (SB1) RMRA 2,272,000 2,200,101 983,329 3,183,430 - - - - 3,183,430 Total 2,272,000$ 2,200,101$ $ 983,329 3,183,430$ $ - $ - $ - $ - 3,183,430 $

PROJECT APPROPRIATIONS
Prior
Appropriations
Estimated
Carryover New Request
Total
Appropriations FY2023-24 FY2024-25 FY2025-26 FY2026-27 FY2023-27
Budget
Construction 2,272,000$ 2,200,101$ $ 983,329 3,183,430$ $ - $ - $ - $ - 3,183,430 $ Project Details
Initial Funding Year FY2019-20
Target Completion Year FY2022-23
Expended as of July 1, 2021 71,899.00$
FY2022-23
Pavement Management Program - 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project Streets Capital
Street Rehabilitation
Project Description: The 2021-22 Street Reconstruction Project includes the rehabilitation and reconstruction of failed streets: Santa Helena Avenue, Mills Avenue, Poplar Avenue, Eastburn Court, Bayshore Circle WB, Darby Place, Oxford Lane and additional streets approved in FY 2022-23.
364

CIP BUDGET

80 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Matthew Lee, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement With Bellecci & Associates for Design Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $529,760 for the 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project (Project Number 60032)
BACKGROUND: The City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the Pavement Management Program (PMP) to repair and apply preventative maintenance treatment to local, collector, and arterial streets. As part of the PMP, the condition of City streets is routinely assessed and recommendations are made on the streets to be selected for rehabilitation to cost effectively maximize pavement longevity. Street condition is measured in terms of pavement condition index (PCI), a numerical index between 0 and 100 in which 0 represents a failed street and 100 represents a newly paved street. The City has a current average Citywide PCI of 62.

Pavement with PCI between 40 and 70 are in poor to fair condition. Pavement with PCIs within this range show some form of distress caused by traffic load or environmental exposure that requires more than a life-extending preventive maintenance treatment; have signs of aging such as cracking; and may require rehabilitation to keep them from deteriorating rapidly. Typical methods of rehabilitation include pavement grind (a removal of a thin layer of existing payment) and asphalt concrete overlays with base repairs, which are more costly than a slurry seal treatment that can be applied as a preventive maintenance treatment for pavement in good condition, but less costly than a full pavement reconstruction usually required for pavement that is structurally failed. Delaying rehabilitation on pavement runs into the risk of pavement falling into a failed condition that will require more costly reconstruction treatment.

The 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project will evaluate approximately 46 sections of pavement with PCIs of 40-70 to be studied and then prioritized for pavement rehabilitation to fit into this fiscal year’s budget. Pavement sections that will not be included in this fiscal year’s design, will be considered in subsequent paving projects based on available budget.

DISCUSSION: In February 2022, the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for on- call engineering services. In the response to the RFQ, Bellecci & Associates submitted a Statement of Qualifications. Staff conducted an evaluation and determined Bellecci & Associates was qualified to be placed on the City’s on-call list for engineering services based on the firm’s understanding of the scope of services, qualifications and experience of

81 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 2 of 3 ends

3 8
4 the project manager(s) and team, qualifications relating to engineering services, and experience with design and construction of CIP projects.

In October 2022 at the request of staff, Bellecci & Associates provided a proposal for professional engineering design and construction support services for the 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project. The scope of work consists of testing and evaluating pavement, providing pavement rehabilitation recommendations, preparing construction bid documents, and providing design support services during construction. Design completion is expected summer 2023.

The 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project will repair portions of existing pavement and prevent rapid deterioration to maximize pavement longevity at various locations and install accessible curb ramps within project limits.

FISCAL IMPACT: The 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project (project number 60032) is within the approved FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program. The agreement with Bellecci & Associates is for a not to exceed amount of $529,760 and within the total project budget of $6,699,341 available in the current fiscal year. The total estimated costs for the project are provided below.

Total estimated cost for the project:

Design Consultant $ 529,760
Estimated Staff Management for Design $ 49,000 Estimated Construction Contract $ 5,000,000 Estimated Constructed Management and
Inspection
$ 370,000
Contingency (15%) $ 750,000
Total Current Estimate: $ 6,698,760
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: This project falls withing the Categorical Exemption set forth in CEQA guidelines, Section 15301, which exempts the rehabilitation of deteriorated existing facilities that involve negligible or no expansion of use.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bellecci & Associates for design services in the amount not to exceed $529,760 for the 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project (Project Number 60032).

ALTERNATIVES: Do not adopt resolution authorizing execution of agreement, and request staff to issue a new request for proposals. This action would result in the delay in the design of pavement rehabilitation on various streets throughout the City.

82 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

3 8
4 ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. CIP Budget

3. Street Rehabilitation Candidate List

83 of 157

1 0
6 5
RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ____

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMEMENT

WITH BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $529,760 FOR THE 2022-23 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT (PROJECT NUMBER 60032)
WHEREAS, the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the Pavement Management Program (PMP) to repair and apply preventative maintenance treatment to local, collector, and arterial streets; and
WHEREAS, the 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project will evaluate and prioritize 46 sections of pavement with Pavement Condition Index (PCI) between 40 and 70 for pavement rehabilitation to fit into this fiscal year’s budget; and WHEREAS, in February 2022, the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for on-call engineering services; and
WHEREAS, in the response to the RFQ, Bellecci & Associates submitted a Statement of Qualifications; and
WHEREAS, staff conducted an evaluation and determined Bellecci & Associates was qualified to be placed on the City’s on-call list for engineering services based on the firm’s understanding of the scope of services, qualifications and experience of the project manager(s) and team, qualifications relating to engineering services, and experience with design and construction of CIP projects; and
WHEREAS, in October 2022 at the request of staff, Bellecci & Associates provided a proposal for professional engineering design and construction support services for the 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project; and
WHEREAS, the scope of work consists of testing and analyzing pavement, providing pavement rehabilitation recommendations, preparing construction bid documents, and providing construction support services; and
WHEREAS, the 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project will repair portions of existing pavement and prevent rapid deterioration to maximize pavement longevity at various locations and install accessible curb ramps within project limits; and WHEREAS, the 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project (project number 60032) is within the approved FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, adequate project budget is available to fund the agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Bruno City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Bellecci & Associates for Design Services in the Amount Not to Exceed $529,760 for the 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project.

84 of 157

1 0
6 5
Dated: November 8, 2022
ATTEST:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT: Councilmembers:

85 of 157

PROJECT #: 60032 Total Project Budget: 6,700,000$
DEPARTMENT: Public Works Total

FUNDING SOURCES
Prior
Appropriations
Estimated
Carryover New Request
Total
Appropriations FY2023-24 FY2024-25 FY2025-26 FY2026-27
FY2023-27
Budget
Measure A -$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Measure G - - 5,400,000 5,400,000 - - - - 5,400,000 Measure W 200,000 199,341 600,000 799,341 - - - - 799,341 Total 200,000$ 199,341$ 6,500,000$ 6,699,341$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,699,341$

PROJECT APPROPRIATIONS
Prior
Appropriations
Estimate
Carryover New Request
Total
Appropriations FY2023-24 FY2024-25 FY2025-26 FY2026-27
FY2023-27
Budget
Design 200,000$ 199,341$ -$ 199,341$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 199,341$ Construction - - 6,500,000 6,500,000 - - - - 6,500,000 Total 200,000$ 199,341$ 6,500,000$ 6,699,341$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,699,341$ Insert Picture Here
Project Details
Initial Funding Year FY2021-22
Target Completion Year FY2022-23
Expended as of July 1, 2021 $659
FY2022-23
Pavement Management Program - 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project Streets Capital
Street Rehabilitation
Project Description: The 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project includes the pavement evaluation and rehabilitation of streets not eligible for preventative maintenance as identified through the Pavement Management Program. Pavement rehabilitation includes asphalt concrete removal and replacement on roadways to extend pavement life by removing surface defects and placing a new asphalt concrete overlay. 366

86 of 157

Attachment 3 – Street Rehabilitation Candidate List
RoadName BegLocation EndLocation

ACACIA AVENUE ANGUS AVENUE SAN BRUNO AVENUE

ADRIATIC WAY WEST END CUL DE SAC EAST END CUL DE SAC

ALLEN DRIVE LONGVIEW DRIVE COLLEGE DRIVE

ANGUS AVENUE WEST EL CAMINO REAL LINDEN AVENUE

ANZA WAY SANTA LUCIA AVENUE NORTH END

BALBOA WAY SOUTH END NORTH END

BEECH AVENUE NILES AVENUE GRUNDY PARK

BENNINGTON DRIVE CRESTMOOR DRIVE MADISON AVENUE

BERKSHIRE DRIVE OAKMONT DRIVE SKYLINE BLVD

CABRILLO WAY SOUTH END NORTH END

CAMBRIDGE LANE CRESTMOOR DRIVE SKYLINE BLVD

CEDAR AVENUE NILES AVENUE JENEVEIN AVENUE

COLLEGE DRIVE SB SHARP PARK RD OUTLOOK DR

CRESTMOOR DRIVE PIEDMONT AVENUE CRYSTAL SPRINGS ROAD

CRYSTAL SPRINGS AVE DONNER AVENUE CUNNINGHAM WAY

CUNNINGHAM WAY CRYSTAL SPRINGS ROAD JENEVEIN AVENUE

CYPRESS AVENUE CRYSTAL SPRINGS AVENUE KAINS AVENUE

DE SOTO WAY SANTA LUCIA AVENUE CITY PARK

DEL NORTE DRIVE MONTEREY DRIVE AMADOR AVENUE

DONNER AVENUE CRYSTAL SPRINGS ROAD NILES AVENUE

EASTON AVENUE EUCLID AVENUE FOREST AVENUE

ELM AVENUE SANTA LUCIA AVENUE CRYSTAL SPRINGS AVENUE

GLEN AVENUE SANTA LUCIA AVENUE END

HAWTHORNE AVENUE NILES AVENUE CEDAR AVENUE

JENEVEIN AVENUE EL CAMINO LINDEN AVENUE

LONGVIEW DRIVE

GOODWIN DRIVE (EAST

CURB) ROSS WAY

MAPLE AVENUE NILES AVENUE END

MERION DRIVE OAKMONT DRIVE FLEETWOOD DRIVE

OLYMPIC COURT OLYMPIC DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC

PALM COURT GREENWOOD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC
PARKING LOT(482
SYLVAN) eastside DRIVEWAY westside DRIVEWAY

PARKVIEW DRIVE SANTA LUCIA GLEN AVENUE

PLUMAS COURT SNEATH LANE CUL-DE-SAC

PORTOLA WAY END DE SOTO WAY

REDWOOD AVENUE NILES AVENUE HAWTHORNE AVENUE

SAN BRUNO AVENUE EB CRESTMOOR DRIVE SKYLINE BLVD
SAN BRUNO AVENUE WB CHERRY AVENUE I-280
SAN BRUNO AVENUE WB EL CAMINO REAL 80' E/O HUNTINGTON AVENUE

SAN FELIPE AVENUE EL CAMINO REAL CITY PARK

87 of 157

Attachment 3 – Street Rehabilitation Candidate List

SAN MATEO AVENUE SCOTT STREET TANFORAN AVENUE (CITY LIMITS)

SCOTT STREET HERMAN STREET HUNTINGTON AVENUE EAST

SEACLIFF WAY PACIFIC HEIGHTS BLVD END

SHELTER CREEK LANE WHITMAN WAY SAN BRUNO AVENUE

SNEATH LANE ROLLINGWOOD DRIVE SEQUOIA AVENUE
ST. CLOUD DRIVE N. CITY LIMITS FLEETWOOD DRIVE

SUNSET DRIVE MOULTON DRIVE YSABEL DRIVE

WILLIAMS AVENUE CYPRESS AVENUE CHESTNUT AVENUE

88 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager

SUBJECT:Adopt Resolution Approving Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) for the Unrepresented Assistant City Manager Position of 6% in Calendar Year 2022 and 3% in Calendar Year 2023
BACKGROUND:

Historically, full-time City of San Bruno classifications that are not represented by a bargaining unit have received Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) following City Council action to approve similar changes for represented bargaining units.

On August 23, 2022, following the ratification of agreements with the Miscellaneous and Mid-Management Teamster bargaining units, the City Council approved COLAs for the following unrepresented classifications:
•Deputy City Clerk
•Executive Assistant to City Manager
•Legal Secretary
•Assistant to the City Manager
•City Clerk
•Economic Development Manager
•Human Resources Manager
•Management Analyst
On October 11, 2022, the City Council settled the remaining open collective bargaining contract with the San Bruno Management Employees Associations (SBMEA), covering all department directors. Additionally, on the same night, the City Council approved a contract amendment for the City Manager’s compensation. Collectively, the aforementioned actions provided a salary and other compensation adjustments for all full-time City positions with the exception of the Assistant City Manager position.

DISCUSSION:

On October 4, 2022, the City Council held a Closed Session for the purpose of a conference with labor negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss compensation for the Assistant City Manager position. At the conclusion of the Closed Session, a majority of the City Council authorized the City Manager to increase the annual

89 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

salary for the Assistant City Manager position by 6% for calendar year 2022 and an additional 3% for calendar year 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT:

An increase in the annual salary for the Assistant City Manager’s position by 6% for calendar year 2022 and an additional 3% for calendar year 2023 will result in the total top- step (maximum) salaries, as shown below.

Calendar Year Increase Max Annual Salary
2021 - $227,112
2022 6% $240,739
2023 3% $247,961
Including salary and benefits, total estimated cost for a full calendar year in 2022 is $15,300 and $8,100 in 2023. Because the current incumbent joined the City on August 15, 2022, the projected cost in 2022 is $5,740.

No additional budget appropriation is requested for the current 2022/23 fiscal year. The total cost for the increase in FY 22-23 is projected to be less than $10,000 and will be funded with salary savings from vacant positions the City Manager’s Office.

Going forward, the additional costs will be incorporated into future annual budgets for the City Manager’s Office.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution Approving Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) for the Unrepresented Assistant City Manager Position of 6% in calendar year 2022 and 3% in calendar year 2023.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution
DATE PREPARED:

November 4, 2022
DISTRIBUTION:

None

90 of 157

RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -

ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING COST-OF-LIVING

ADJUSTMENTS (COLAS) FOR THE UNREPRESENTED ASSISTANT
CITY MANAGER POSITION OF 6% IN CALENDAR YEAR 2022 AND
3% IN CALENDAR YEAR 2023
WHEREAS, the City of San Bruno’s Assistant City Manager position is an unrepresented classification within the City Manager’s Office; WHEREAS, on October 4, 2022, the City Council held a Closed Session for the purpose of a conference with labor negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss compensation for the Assistant City Manager position; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Bruno City Council desires the increase the annual salary for the Assistant City Manager position by 6% in 2022 and 3% in 2023.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Bruno that it hereby approves Cost-of-Living Adjustments for the City’s unrepresented Assistant City Manager position of 6% in calendar year 2022 and 3% in calendar year 2023, effective first full pay period in January of each calendar year (as prorated based on the start date of the employee).

Dated: November 8, 2022
—oOo—
I hereby certify that foregoing Resolution No. 2022 - ____ was adopted by the San Bruno City Council at a regular meeting on November 8, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT:Councilmembers:

ATTEST:
________________________________
Vicky Hasha, Deputy City Clerk

91 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Bobby Magee, Interim Finance Director
PREPARED BY: Esther Garibay-Fernandes, Financial Services Manager SUBJECT:Receive First Quarter Financial Update Report for FY2022-23 as of September 30, 2022 and Adopt a Resolution Approving the Carryover of FY2022-23 Purchase Order Encumbrances and
FY2022-23 Budget Amendments
BACKGROUND:

The City Council approved the FY2022-23 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget on June 28, 2022. The approved budget is the annual plan and resource allocation guiding and ensuring implementation of City Council policies and priorities. The budget implements the vision and direction for the broad range of services that meet the needs of the community in accordance with City Council policy.

The City of San Bruno operates on a July 1 to June 30 fiscal year cycle. This financial review covers the period of July 1, 2022 through September 30, 2022 and serves as the first quarter budget update to the City Council for the current fiscal year. Analysis of the revenues collected and expenditures through September 30th provides a status updated of the objectives and priorities for departments that were articulated in the FY2022-23 budget.

The FY2022-23 adopted budget allocations do not include any purchase orders for the city’s vendors from the prior fiscal year. During the FY2021-22 year-end financial close process, staff determine the vendor purchase orders that should be carried forward into FY2022-23 for services and other work to be performed. When a purchase order is executed, the department’s budget line item for this expense is encumbered. An encumbrance is a portion of the budget that is set aside for the specific purpose outlined in the purchase order and cannot be used for any other purpose. The execution of purchase orders and encumbrances is a best practice for purchasing and budget management functions to ensure the City spend money in accordance with the budget and can effectively manage and track spending during the fiscal year. This report presents the total encumbrances from the prior fiscal year for City Council approval to be carried forward into FY2022-23. These encumbrances ensure that previously authorized funds are available in the current year covering incomplete projects and other continuing obligations.

92 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Q1 FY2022-23 Financial Update Report – November 8, 2022

Page 2 of 10 ends

DISCUSSION:

Financial Overview
The attached FY2022-23 Q1 Financial Report provides a summary of revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Enterprise Funds, and Internal Service Funds. The following discussion focuses on variances from the revenue and expenditure plans and allocations contemplated in the budget.

General Fund
The General Fund finances the operations of the City that have no special or dedicated revenue sources and pays for basic municipal services. The FY2022-23 adopted General Fund budget projects revenues totaling $54,885,106 and expenditures totaling $55,519,905 resulting in a deficit of $634,799. General Fund revenues come from taxes, such as property, sales, transient occupancy, and business license tax, among others, department revenues for services provided, and franchise fees among other sources of revenues. General Fund expenditures include the public safety functions of Police and Fire operations, General Administration, Public Works, Community and Economic Development, and Community Services among other functions. The City Council adopted the FY2022-23 budget authorizing the use of available fund balance in the General Fund to address the $634,799 deficit. Funding to cover the difference between revenues and expenditures is detailed in the FY2022-23 operating budget.

The first quarter financial update contains limited data and the one-time nature of various revenue and expenditure transactions that only provide limited trend information as of this early point in the fiscal year. For example, nearly all of the City’s secured property tax revenue is received in two payments (one in December and another in April). In addition, there are large expenditure payments that occur during the first quarter, such as a lump sum payment to CalPERS for annual employee pension cost as well as Association of Bay Area Governments liability and property insurance premiums are paid in full during the first quarter. Total actual revenues received for the first quarter are estimated at 20% of budget, which is approximately four percent less than the first quarter in FY2021-22. Expenditures are currently estimated at 32% of the approved budget, which is a similar figure as the prior fiscal year upon completion of the 1st quarter.

Notable Revenues – General Fund
Property Tax: (FY2022-23 Q1: 7% of budget compared to 7% in FY2021-22). The Finance Department currently estimates that property tax revenue will come in 1% lower than previous fiscal year. The majority of the property tax revenue is normally received in December and April. So far, the revenue received is on pace with previous years.

93 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Q1 FY2022-23 Financial Update Report – November 8, 2022

Page 3 of 10 ends

Sales Tax: (FY2022-23 Q1: 16% of budget compared to 6% in FY2021-22). Overall sales tax revenues throughout the course of the fiscal year are expected to increase over the previous fiscal year by 2%. The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration reported higher revenues received in first quarter, as compared to previous year, by $1,099,785 due primarily to higher than expected tax returns submitted by local retailers.

Hotel/Motel Occupancy Tax: (FY2022-23 Q1: 20% of budget compared to 24% in FY2021-22). Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue was budgeted $1,039,400 higher in FY2022-23 than FY2021-22, under the assumption that hotel tax revenues would increase about 60% from previous year. During the first quarter, the City received $150,800 more in TOT than same period last year, which appears to reflect the expected gradual improvement of the hospitality industry.

Motor Vehicle License Fee (VLF): (FY2022-23 Q1: 36% of budget compared to 0% in FY2021-22). VLF revenue is received as property tax in-lieu, due in two installments in December and April in conjunction with the County’s property tax payments. In FY2020-21 San Mateo County endured a significant VLF Shortfall. As a result, the County filed a claim with the State Department of Finance on behalf of the counties and cities where San Bruno received $2,399,390 from FY2020-21 VLF shortfall on 8/2/22.

This was primarily due to Pacifica Elementary School, which was originally projected as basic aid turned non-basic aid at 6-30-22. As a result of this action, the total property taxes of non-basic aid school districts that are used to fund VLF increased by $23.9 million, thus reducing the VLF shortfall amount to $32.9 million from 56 million.

Currently the City expects to see an overall decrease in VLF fees FY2022-23 Adopted Budget of ($463,000).

Regulatory Card Room Tax: (FY2022-23 Q1: 34% of budget compared to 24% in FY2021-22). First quarter FY2022-23 is $240,000 higher than same period last year, as the card room tax was expected to increase over the previous fiscal year. After reviewing additional requests for City services from Artichoke Joes, Finance updated the rate calculation for their firm through a negotiated agreement. City Council approved the resolution on July 12, 2022 for a quarterly increase of Card Room Tax of $225,000 in addition to $2,071 CPI Increase per table. As a result, the annual card room tax revenue expects a 2% increase this year compared to last year.

Business Taxes: (FY2022-23 Q1: 38% of budget compared to 57% in FY2021-22).

Business taxes are due to the City when applications are submitted and annually on August 1st. First quarter FY2022-23 is $478,000 lower than same period last year. The City received late payment on some of its top grossing vendors, which has not hit the City’s accounting systems as of the close of the 1st quarter books. As local businesses continue to catch up on the required licenses, overall business tax revenues are expected to be received at a level closer to budgeted amounts in the mid-year report.

94 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Q1 FY2022-23 Financial Update Report – November 8, 2022

Page 4 of 10 ends

Departmental – Aggregate: (FY2022-23 Q1: 24% of budget compared to 27% in FY2021-22). Total departmental revenues as of the first quarter for FY2022-23 are $394,790 lower than in FY2021-22. In FY2021-22 funding was received for the February 2021 Cost Recovery Agreement, which does not continue into this fiscal year.

Overall, a slight increase in revenue for Public Works Engineer Plan check and Planning fees continues to be expected.

High-level Expenditure Summary Trends – General Fund
Total Expenditures: (FY2022-23 Q1: 32% of budget compared to 32% in FY2021-22).

As noted above, first quarter expenditures are typically higher due to the City choosing to take advantage of the CalPERS pre-payment option of both the Safety and Miscellaneous Plans’ annual costs for the Unfunded Accrued Liability for CalPERS employee retirement of approximately $8.6 Million in FY2022-23, which is $0.9 Million more than FY2021-22.

Aggregate departmental expenditures were at 32%, similar to last year during the same time period. It should be noted that there was a $1,887,474 increase over the same time period last year due to the Union contract negotiations involving salary and CalPERS retroactive payments on 9/16/22. Most departments expenditures are in the range of 28% - 33%, with the exception of the Fire department which was at 38% with CalPERS being the highest driver of the contract negotiations offset by reduced Overtime expenses.

Measure G Fund
A total of $3.7 million was budgeted for Measure G revenue, the half-cent use tax approved by voters in 2019. Based on a recent update from the City’s Sales Tax consultants, HdL, Measure G appears to be on target and in line with FY2022-23 Adopted Budget. However, the first quarter in FY2022-23 is 12% higher than same period in FY2021-22. During the Budget Hearing of FY2022-23, City Council approved expenditures of $6,110,000.

Enterprises and Internal Service Funds (ISFs)
Four Enterprise Funds make up the City’s business type operations. The Water Fund, Stormwater Fund, Wastewater Fund, and CityNet Services Fund are City municipal operations designed to fully recover costs through user fees. Internal Service Funds, which include the Central Garage, Building and Facilities Maintenance, Self-Insurance, and Technology Support also operate as business activities, exclusively supporting the City’s internal operations.

Notable Revenues – Enterprise & ISFs
Water: (FY2022-23 Q1: 30% of budget compared to 28% in FY2021-22). Revenues for

95 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Q1 FY2022-23 Financial Update Report – November 8, 2022

Page 5 of 10 ends

the first quarter were $4,549,900 compared to $4,647,700 in the prior year. The City did not increase the water rate this year. Water consumption for FY2022-23 is closely equivalent to the same period last year.

Wastewater: (FY2022-23 Q1: 30% of budget compared to 28% in FY2021-22).

Revenues for the first quarter were $4,888,100, compared to $5,000,600 in the prior year. Similar to water operations, the City did not increase rates for wastewater operations this year. The wastewater consumption is based on winter months water usage and is calculated for the period from November thru April. These are updated in the billing system every July. Wastewater operations also have similar averages in FY022-23 compared to same period last year.

Both Water and Wastewater Utility accounts continue to have significant delinquencies as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. To collect overdue balances, Finance sent out several courtesy letters encouraging delinquent customers to set up payment plans and received responses from some customers. However, since the City has not sent out hangtags, customers continue to fall behind on payments and therefore continue to have significant delinquencies. Although the City received assistance program funding from several agencies such as State Waterboard for both Water $440,000 and Wastewater $320,000 for customers that qualified during the time period March 2020 thru June 2021; and programs like Housing is Key (CA COVID-19 Rent Relief Program), Samaritan House, Family Housing & Adult Resources, these funds are still not enough due to customers continuing to fall behind on their payments and effort to bring their account balances up to date.

Stormwater: (FY2022-23 Q1: 0% of budget compared to 15% of budget in FY2021-22).

Stormwater fees are collected through the County property tax roll with the first payment expected in December. The 15% difference in FY2021-22 were internal transfers from ARPA approved funds per Adopted Budget FY21-22 totaling $1,000,000 to help Stormwater Fund.

CityNet Services: (FY2022-23 Q1: 23% of budget compared to 21% in FY2021-22).

Actual revenues of $2,078,000 are $20,700 less than the previous year. The CityNet budget for the FY2022-23 year was reduced by $873,600. CityNet also experienced high delinquencies, similar to utility services during the Covid-19 pandemic. As a result, staff sent a letter to delinquent households in November 2020 indicating they would be switched to basic cable services if they did not bring their accounts up to date.

Consequently, delinquent customers were downgraded to a lower subscription and rate plan last year. CityNet lowered the budget revenues during budget planning to reflect the lower rate subscriptions for phone service, internet service, regular tv and premium channels on traditional cable service, digital equipment and slow pickup of new subscriptions on Streaming TV service which is slated to launch between January and March 2023. CityNet reports delinquencies totaling approximately $123,571 as of September 30, 2022.

96 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Q1 FY2022-23 Financial Update Report – November 8, 2022

Page 6 of 10 ends

Expenditures for the four Enterprise Funds are all within their respective budget levels for the first three months of the fiscal year.

Internal Service Funds: (FY2022-23 Q1: 35% of budget compared to 35% in FY2022- 23). Charges for each of the Internal Service Funds are by monthly allocation based on the adopted budget.

FY2021-22 Carryover Purchase Order Encumbrances
The attached resolution re-appropriates outstanding encumbrances as of June 30, 2022 to the FY2022-23 budget to ensure that previously authorized funds are available in the current year to cover expenditures for uncompleted projects and continuing obligations approved during FY2021-22.

The largest PO Carryover amount listed below is under Facilities due to the Recreation & Aquatics Center project previously approved by City Council last fiscal year. The outstanding encumbrances are detailed in Attachment 3 to this report and are summarized as follows:

Fund Amount
General Fund $1,089,024
ARPA Fund 166,272
Police Asset Forfeiture Fund 52,461
Federal /State Grants Fund 2,330
In Lieu Fees 10,000
Restricted Revenues Fund 7,720
Disaster Recovery Fund 2,864
Parks Capital Fund 48,711
Fire Capital Fund 201,246
Facilities Capital Fund 37,120,436
Streets Capital Fund 2,081,149
Technology Capital Fund 148,574
Water Fund 3,281,276
Stormwater Fund 127,183
Wastewater Fund 830,867
CityNet Services Fund 49,076
Central Garage Fund 8,431
Facility Maintenance Fund 26,151
General Equipment Revolving Fund: 891,416
Technology Development Fund 33,451
Total $46,178,638

97 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Q1 FY2022-23 Financial Update Report – November 8, 2022

Page 7 of 10 ends

Budget Amendments
The following table summarizes the budget amendments being recommended, with explanations below:

Item Fund Program / Request
Revenue
Increase/
(Decrease)
Expenditure
Increase
/(Decrease)
A General Fund Police Department $33,589
B General Fund Building 785,000 785,000
C General Fund Library 26,000
D Equipment
Reserves Police Department 42,058
E Development
Impact Fees Community Services $100,000
An explanation of the proposed budget amendments for the first quarter of FY2022-23 is below.

A. General Fund – Police Department:

The Police Department is asking for a $33,589 expenditure increase for LawNet Messaging Switch - The LawNet network connects police departments and the County's criminal justice agencies together and provides a gateway to external criminal justice networks. The equipment is more than 12 years old and needs to be replaced due to age. LawNet uses unreliable, expensive, and outdated AT&T circuits. These circuits need to be replaced with fiber-optic circuits and this will allow agencies to ensure higher standards of encryption. The shared components for the system are funded by all participating law enforcement agencies through the Message-Switch Budget which is administered by the County's Office of Public Safety Communications. The County invoices each participating agency for share of the overall budget. Each participating agency is responsible for purchasing its own date communications equipment.

98 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Q1 FY2022-23 Financial Update Report – November 8, 2022

Page 8 of 10 ends

B. General Fund – Building:

A request to increase revenue by $785,000 and expenditures account and appropriation of $785,000 to pay for Consultant Off-Site Plan Check Services.

The expenditure will be offset by the increase in Revenue as the services are fully cost recoverable.

C. General Fund – Library:

The Department is recommending additional tools & equipment in the amount of $26,000 for Replacement of self-checkout machines and security gates.

The units/software are no longer supported and presents a network security risk.

D. Equipment Reserves – Police Department:

Bulletproof Vests - Replacement of expired bulletproof vests required by MOU for members of the police department. Partially grant funded by Federal Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP Federal Grant Program). Total cost was $62,057.11 minus the grant PD received for $19,998.90 for a total cost to the equipment reserve fund of $42,058.21.

E. Development Impact Fees:

Funding for the City on-call Landscape Architect for the Crestmoor Multi-Use Fields Facility Project. The consultant will facilitate a community engagement process, build consensus for a preferred master plan, and prepare plans and supporting documents delineating proposed multi-use fields facility improvements at the former Crestmoor High School site. The current developer has offered to dedicate this land to the City. The recommended action includes an increase in expenditures of $100,000 to this fund.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The resolution appropriating funds in the budget amendment for purchase order carryover encumbrances will increase the adopted Operating and Capital Improvement Budget in each fund as summarized below:

99 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Q1 FY2022-23 Financial Update Report – November 8, 2022

Page 9 of 10 ends

Facilities Capital Fund 37,120,436
Streets Capital Fund 2,081,149
Technology Capital Fund 148,574
Water Fund 3,281,276
Stormwater Fund 127,183
Wastewater Fund 830,867
CityNet Services Fund 49,076
Central Garage Fund 8,431
Facility Maintenance Fund 26,151
General Equipment Revolving Fund 891,416
Technology Development Fund 33,451
Total $46,178,638
The resolution appropriating funds for additional budget amendments will change the adopted operating and capital improvement budgeted appropriation in each fund as summarized below:

Fund Revenue Budget
Change
Expenditure Budget
Change
General Fund $785,000 $844,589
Equipment Reserves 42,058
Development Impact Fund $100,000
ALTERNATIVES:

1. Do not adopt a resolution approving the carryover of FY2021-22 Purchase Order Encumbrances in FY2022-23 and provide direction to staff.

2. Do not adopt a resolution approving additional budget amendments for FY2022- 23 and provide direction to staff.

RECOMMENDATION:

Receive First Quarter Financial Update Report as of September 30, 2022 for FY2022- 23 and adopt resolution amending FY2022-23 Operating and Capital Improvement

100 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Q1 FY2022-23 Financial Update Report – November 8, 2022

Page 10 of 10 ends

Budget approving carryover FY2021-22 purchase order encumbrances and budget amendments.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Quarterly Financial Report as of September 30, 2022

3. Outstanding Purchase Orders by Fund on June 30, 2022 DATE PREPARED:

October 20, 2022

101 of 157

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-_____

RESOLUTION APPROVING FIRST QUARTER BUDGET AMENDMENT
FOR FY2022-23 OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND CARRYOVER OF FY2021-22 PURCHASE ORDER ENCUMBRANCES AND FY2022-23 BUDGET

AMENDMENTS

WHEREAS, the City prepares and adopts its budgets with the intent of providing a planned policy program for City services and a financial system to carry out the planned program of services; and

WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution no. 2022-58 adopting the FY2022-23 Operating and Capital Budget on June 28, 2022; and

WHEREAS, the City Council may amend the budget as necessary to account for changing conditions; and

WHEREAS, amendments for revenues and expenditures impacting the various funds should be approved consistent with the operating requirements and previous City Council actions and consistent with the information provided with the first quarter financial status report received by the City Council on November 8, 2022;

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the carryover of the following amounts by fund to pay for carryover purchase orders for operating and capital improvement program commitments as shown in the accompanying staff report; and WHEREAS, the re-appropriation of those prior budgeted funds ensures that previously authorized funds are available in the current year budget to cover the cost of uncompleted projects and continuing obligations; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed various budget change requests for amendment as shown in the accompanying staff report.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Bruno hereby resolves to:
 Authorize the carryover and appropriation as reflected in the accompanying staff report; and
 Amend the various funds for budget amendments reflected in the accompanying staff report; and
 The Finance Director or Accounting Manager is hereby authorized to make these budget changes provided they are solely to correct errors and discrepancies.

—o0o—

I hereby certify that foregoing Resolution No. 2022- __ was introduced and adopted by the San Bruno City Council at a regular meeting on November 8, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

City Clerk

102 of 157

Attachment II City of San Bruno
1st Quarter Financial Report
As of September 30, 2022

GENERAL FUND
Projection
Amended
Budget
YTD
9/30/2022
% of
Budget Q1 Changes
Year End
Projection
Amended
Budget
YTD
9/30/2021
% of
Budget
Yr to Yr
Change ($)
Yr to Yr
Change
(%)

GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Property Tax 12,188,998 868,043 7% - 12,188,998 12,370,268 877,598 7% ($9,554) -1% Sales Tax 10,876,105 1,733,851 16% - 10,876,105 10,713,464 632,052 6% 1,101,799 174% Hotel/Motel Occupancy Tax 2,772,483 561,368 20% - 2,772,483 1,733,041 410,549 24% 150,819 37% Motor Vehicle License Fee 6,632,000 2,399,390 36% - 6,632,000 3,474,507 - 0% 2,399,390 0% Regulatory (Card Room) Tax 2,331,075 795,309 34% - 2,331,075 2,278,567 555,148 24% 240,161 43% Business Taxes 2,005,000 762,152 38% - 2,005,000 2,159,000 1,240,450 57% (478,298) -39% Franchise Fees 1,827,000 291,974 16% - 1,827,000 1,839,000 302,470 16% (10,496) -3% Use of Money and Property 818,900 444,177 54% - 818,900 754,524 211,923 28% 232,254 110% Charges for Services 4,804,800 1,201,197 25% - 4,804,800 4,565,759 1,141,447 25% 59,750 5% Recoveries & One-time 1,776,000 38,920 2% - 1,776,000 518,474 20,403 4% 18,517 91% Sub Total 46,032,361 9,096,380 20% - 46,032,361 40,406,604 5,392,039 13% 3,704,341 69%

DEPARTMENTAL
Police 3,123,191 585,759 19% - 3,123,191 2,507,327 1,218,446 49% ($632,687)-52% Fire 741,204 200,662 27% - 741,204 810,947 220,851 27% (20,188) -9% Public Works 1,341,800 374,229 28% - 1,341,800 1,140,300 275,733 24% 98,496 36% Planning 310,427 149,733 48% - 310,427 285,000 19,363 7% 130,371 673% Building 2,772,525 757,338 27% 785,000 3,557,525 4,007,647 713,765 18% 43,573 6% Recreation 508,498 80,831 16% - 508,498 390,521 107,927 28% (27,096) -25% Senior Services 218,500 14,482 7% - 218,500 251,500 6,235 2% 8,247 132% Parks 3,500 735 21% - 3,500 3,500 525 15% 210 40% Library 8,600 7,108 83% - 8,600 6,153 2,824 46% 4,284 152% Sub Total 9,028,245 2,170,878 24% 785,000 9,813,245 9,402,895 2,565,668 27% ($394,790)-15% Total Revenues 55,060,606 11,267,258 20% 785,000 55,845,606 49,809,499 7,957,707 16% 3,309,551 42% Expenditures
General Administration
City Council 203,504 57,169 28% - 203,504 174,354 22,699 13% 34,470 152% City Clerk 632,966 129,048 20% - 632,966 560,230 132,481 24% (3,433) -3% City Attorney's Office 626,677 175,665 28% - 626,677 653,753 158,357 24% 17,307 11% City Manager's Office 1,410,466 381,280 27% - 1,410,466 1,308,502 351,333 27% 29,947 9% Human Resources 1,117,758 266,982 24% - 1,117,758 893,956 238,570 27% 28,413 12% Finance - Administration 1,712,865 572,226 33% - 1,712,865 1,440,751 399,219 28% 173,007 43% Finance - Revenue Services 1,083,494 343,665 32% - 1,083,494 1,203,736 380,074 32% (36,408) -10% Police 21,013,919 7,151,193 34% 33,589 21,047,508 19,477,578 6,449,623 33% 701,571 11% Fire 12,911,839 4,854,089 38% - 12,911,839 11,584,122 4,570,477 39% 283,612 6% Public Works 4,346,876 1,247,620 29% - 4,346,876 3,940,639 1,040,583 26% 207,037 20% Planning 1,791,840 520,490 29% - 1,791,840 1,651,847 388,618 24% 131,872 34% Building 1,982,643 553,071 28% 785,000 2,767,643 1,702,059 411,530 24% 141,540 34% Recreation 2,158,038 525,213 24% - 2,158,038 1,641,487 494,473 30% 30,740 6% Parks 3,056,327 949,600 31% - 3,056,327 2,718,520 704,505 26% 245,095 35% Senior Services 1,347,954 327,822 24% - 1,347,954 1,239,307 322,945 26% 4,877 2% Library 2,357,601 712,550 30% 26,000 2,383,601 2,146,411 704,611 33% 7,938 1% Non-Departmental and Debt Service(580,229) (393,891) 68% - (580,229) (776,023) (283,781) 37% (110,110) 39% Total Expenditures 57,174,538 18,373,792 32% 844,589 58,019,127 51,561,229 16,486,318 32% 1,887,474 11% Operating Surplus/(Deficit)(2,113,931) (59,589) ($2,173,520) ($1,751,730) Revenues
FY2020-21 FY2022-23 v FY2021-22
September 30, 2021
FY2022-23
September 30, 2022

103 of 157

Attachment II City of San Bruno
1st Quarter Financial Report
As of September 30, 2022
Projection
Amended
Budget
YTD
9/30/2022
% of
Budget Q1 Changes
Annual
Projection
Amended
Budget
YTD
9/30/2021
% of
Budget
Yr to Yr
Change ($)
Yr to Yr
Change
(%)
Measure G
Revenues 3,763,212 764,978 20% - 3,763,212 3,509,000 268,336 8% 496,642 185% Expenditures 6,110,000 119,603 2% - $6,110,000 ($1,790,000) ($240,000) 13% $359,603 -150% Total 9,873,212 884,581 9% 0 9,873,212 1,719,000 28,336 2% 856,245 3022% Equipment Reserve
Expenditures 581,100 $80,419 14% 42,058 $623,158 $761,881 $47,084 6% $33,335 71% Total 581,100 $80,419 14% 42,058 623,158 761,881 47,084 6% 33,335 71% FY2020-21 FY2022-23 v FY2021-22
September 30, 2021
Other
September 30, 2022
FY2022-23

104 of 157

Attachment II City of San Bruno
1st Quarter Financial Report
As of September 30, 2022
Amended
Budget
YTD
9/30/2022
% of
Budget Q1 Change Projection
Amended
Budget
YTD
9/30/2021
% of
Budget
Yr to Yr
Change ($)
Yr to Yr
Change
(%)
Central Garage
Revenue $713,119 $178,284 25% - $713,119 $882,154 $239,287 27% ($61,003) -25% Expenditure $893,088 $257,160 29% - $893,088 $799,814 $223,646 28% $33,514 15% Buildings & Facilities
Revenue $1,551,198 $387,804 25% - $1,551,198 $1,965,163 $610,916 31% ($223,112)-37% Expenditure $2,020,995 $614,152 30% - 2,020,995 $2,005,161 $551,544 28% $62,608 11% Self-Insurance
Revenue $3,408,873 $852,216 25% - $3,408,873 $2,928,085 $732,021 25% $120,195 16% Expenditure $3,408,873 $2,130,430 62% - 3,408,873 $2,928,085 $1,843,440 63% $286,990 16% Technology
Revenue $1,627,641 $406,905 25% - $1,627,641 $1,166,010 $485,718 42% ($78,813) -16% Expenditure $1,534,964 $304,168 20% - 1,534,964 $1,372,091 $299,189 22% $4,979 2% Water Enterprise
Revenue $15,031,393$4,549,899 30% - $15,031,393 $16,793,365$4,647,724 28% ($97,824) -2% Expenditure $12,632,134$2,219,552 18% - 12,632,134 $10,490,155$2,103,963 20% $115,589 5% Stormwater Enterprise
Revenue $650,000 $0 0% - 650,000 $1,659,500 $249,999 15% #REF! 0% Expenditure $1,713,185 412,660 24% - 1,713,185 $1,468,038 $346,650 24% ($346,650)-100% Wastewater Enterprise
Revenue $16,188,653$4,888,110 30% - $16,188,653 $17,942,726$5,000,612 28% ($112,502) -2% Expenditure $11,495,847$2,847,039 25% - 11,495,847 $9,858,895 $2,396,311 24% $450,728 19% CityNet Services
Revenue $8,937,164 $2,078,065 23% - 8,937,164 $9,810,775 $2,098,750 21% ($20,685) -1% Expenditure $8,751,398 $2,123,162 24% - 8,751,398 $9,852,227 $2,170,430 22% ($47,268) -2% FY2020-21 FY2022-23 v FY2021-22
September 30, 2021FY2022-23
FY2022-23
September 30, 2022

ENTERPRISES & INTERNAL

SERVICE FUNDS

105 of 157

PO NumberVendor PO Description Outstanding Amount at June 30, 2022
001 General Fund
1120-000020098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLCELECTION SERVICES AND CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUPPORT 20,000.00 1210-000140098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC EXPERT PROJECT ADVISORY SERVICES TO THE SAN BRUNO PUBLIC

WORKS DEPARTMENT
545.00
1210-000140098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC EXPERT PROJECT ADVISORY SERVICES TO THE SAN BRUNO PUBLIC

WORKS DEPARTMENT
272.50
1210-000160016967 GROUP 4 EASIBILITY STUDY ON CONVERSION OF EXISTING FORMER EL CRYSTAL SITE @ 201 BALBOA
960.00
1210-000170109929 SMITH AND ASSOCIATES, INC., DISTRICT ELECTIONS PUBLIC OUTREACH & ENGAGEMENT 9.02 1210-000170109929 SMITH AND ASSOCIATES, INC., DISTRICT ELECTIONS PUBLIC OUTREACH & ENGAGEMENT 3,137.86 1210-000180110125 SCHOFIELD IMAGES CITYWIDE PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES FOR DIGITAL PHOTO LIBRARY 1,350.00 1210-000190098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC PROJECT MNGMNT SERVICES FOR INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY RFP

PROCESS
8,000.00
1210-000200108425 GOOD CITY COMPANY PLANNING SERVICES TO EXAMINE POTENTIAL NEW LOCATION FOR

JOINT CORPORATION YARD
9,557.07
1210-000210110189 TBWBH PROPS & MEASURES BALLOT CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR POTENTIAL NOV 2022 BALLOT 7,933.34 1210-000210110189 TBWBH PROPS & MEASURES BALLOT CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR POTENTIAL NOV 2022 BALLOT 17,566.66 1220-000080109976 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM, INC. NEOGOV - IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPREHENSIVE HR, PAYROLL AND

TALENT MGMT PLATFOR
45,030.01
1250-000420098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC PROFESSIONAL ADVISORY SERVICES TO SAN BRUNO FINANCE

DEPARTMENT
8,750.00
1251-000030108301 R3 CONSULTING GROUP CONDUCT DETAILED PERFORMANCE & RATE REVIEW FOR RECOLOGY

NEGOTIATION
67,162.50
2010-000960105899 SUN RIDGE SYSTEMS, INC RIMS CIBRS REPORTING SOFTWARE 25,000.00 2010-001000016774 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPMENT CO.FY2021 DUTY & TRAINING AMMUNITION 30.97 2010-001000016774 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPMENT CO.FY2021 DUTY & TRAINING AMMUNITION 1,596.60 2010-001160105899 SUN RIDGE SYSTEMS, INC RIMS SEPARATION DATA EXTRACTION 18,000.00 2010-001170018807 GALLS, LLC POINT BLANK BLACK SERIES AXBIIIA BODY ARMOR VESTS 62,057.11 2110-000430014878 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.MOTOROLA CHARGERS, DISPLAY AND CABLES 287.24 2110-000500109784 AP TRITON CONSULTING AP TRITON - STANDARDS OF COVER STUDY 4,227.00 2110-000640014878 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.MOTOROLA - FLASHPORT, SMARTZONE & SOFTWARE 3,447.60 3010-004370105955 COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.,
WEST
WC3 STAFF AUGMENTATION, PLAN CHECK, LAND DEV SUPPORT
SRVCS
23,775.00
3010-004660018898 TJKM TRANSPORTATION

CONSULTANT

TJKM PROJ MGMT & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SRVCS STAFF

AUGMENTATION
19,872.50
3010-004810000911 COTTON, SHIRES & ASSOCIATES COTTON SHIRES & ASSOC GEOTECHNICAL SRVCS SLOPE CONDITIONS46,532.19 3010-004940018898 TJKM TRANSPORTATION TJKM TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTING SRVCS 21,228.75 3010-005090018899 EOA INC. EOA, INC STORMWATER INSPECTION SRVCS 42,484.13 3310-000370109565 LAND LOGISTICS, INC. PROFESSIONAL PLANNING CONSULTANT ASSISTANCE 30,647.50 3310-000410018799 ECONOMIC&PLANNING SYSTEMS
INC.

EPS ECONOMIC CONSULTANT AS NEEDED-CITY INITIATED PROJECTS 62,307.50 3310-000420109565 LAND LOGISTICS, INC. LAND LOGISTICS PROF CONSULTANT SRVCS FOR CANNABIS-RELATED

CITY ORDINANCES
7,712.50

106 of 157

3310-000430098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP PROF CONSULTANT SRVCS FOR

CRESTMOOR
24,822.50
3310-000440098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLCCONSULTANT SERVCES POLICY PROGRAM COACHING SUPPORT 34,366.45 3310-000440098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLCCONSULTANT SERVCES POLICY PROGRAM COACHING SUPPORT 6,366.45 3310-000460108696 POWERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,

DAVID J
DJ POWERS PROF SRVCS: CEQA/HOUSING ELEMENT 28,291.69
3310-000470108425 GOOD CITY COMPANY GOOD CITY - HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE PROJ MGMT, COMMUNITY

OUTREACH SRVCS
3,597.50
3320-000150105955 COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.,
WEST
WC3 FY21 BLDG DIVISION STAFF AUGMENTATION ON-DEMAND 67,905.00 3320-000170105955 COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.,
WEST
WC3 BUILDING DIVISION CBO STAFFING (ON-DEMAND) 8,510.00 3320-000180105955 COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.,
WEST
FY21-22 IN-HOUSE PLANS EXAMINER SERVICES 2,860.00
3320-000190105955 COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.,
WEST
WC3 ON-CALL BLDG DIVISION STAFF SRVCS-TECH,SR INSPECTOR 62,165.00 4110-001180000386 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCOCITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAN STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE FY21-22 17,816.94 4110-001190106743 SAFETY NETWORK TRAFFIC SIGNSSAFETY NETWORK TRAFFIC SIGNS REPLACEMENT PROJECT 90.00 4110-001220105718 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.,

ALAMEDA
ALAMEDA ELECTRICAL DIST (4) HAPCO POLES-STREETS 6,245.30 5110-000380092223 CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD,

PENINSULA
RAILROAD PLACE TREE CUTTING 15,120.00
5110-000390013683 F. FERRANDO & CO. CONCRETE AND REPAIR SERVICES 17,006.00 5110-000400016874 DU-ALL SAFETY, LLC ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY COMPLIANCE 6,195.00 5110-000420018048 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC.,

CALLANDER ASSOCIATES
ARBORIST SERVICES 60,000.00
5110-000430017924 LORAL LANDSCAPING INC.WEED ABATEMENT IN RIGHT OF WAYS 15,007.00 5110-000440096767 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC.AS NEEDED EMERGENCY TREE WORK 60,000.00 4110-001170001782 FLOWERS ELECTRIC & SVC.CO.INC. FLOWERS ELEC FY21-22 BLANKET STREETLIGHT MAINTENANCE AND

ELEC REPAIR
93,178.92
1,089,024.30$
006 American Rescue Plan Act Fund
3010-004940018898 TJKM TRANSPORTATION TJKM TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTING SRVCS 130,000.00 3320-000190105955 COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.,
WEST
WC3 ON-CALL BLDG DIVISION STAFF SRVCS-TECH,SR INSPECTOR 36,272.20 166,272.20$
111 Police Asset Forfeiture Fund
1210-000120109600 IMPACT JUSTICE PROF SVCS FOR SAFE & EQUITABLE POLICING REVIEW 2,461.08 2010-001190109337 FLOCK SAFETY FLOCK ALPR CAMERAS 50,000.00 52,461.08$
121 Federal / State Grants Fund
2110-000430014878 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. MOTOROLA CHARGERS, DISPLAY AND CABLES 2,329.97 2,329.97$

107 of 157

131 In-Lieu Fees
3310-000490106460 LIFEMOVES LIFEMOVES - FY21-22 AND FY22-23 10,000.00 10,000.00$
133 Restricted Revenues Fund
2010-001170018807 GALLS, LLC POINT BLANK BLACK SERIES AXBIIIA BODY ARMOR VESTS 7,720.26 7,720.26$
136 Emergency Disaster Reserve Fund
2110-000590110063 GLOBAL LLC DBA WESHIELD, FLOWFLEX COVID-19 ANTIGEN TESTS 2,863.75 2,863.75$
201 Parks and Facilities Capital Fund
1210-000060016967 GROUP 4 PROF CONSTR DESIGN SRVCS FOR PHASE II OF NEW RECREATION

AND AQUATICS CENTER
771,757.32
1520-000370109532 MATRIX HG, INC. MATRIX HG HVAC CIP LIBRARY PROJ 51012 FY 21-22 199,917.00 2110-000420105134 CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS CA CONSERVATION CORPS-CRESTMOOR CANYON PROJ PH II YR 1 OF 4 131,981.00
2110-000520108094 TONY LOPES JR TONY LOPES JR. - MULCHING HEAD & OPERATOR CRESTMOOR CANYON
1,925.00
3010-004320108302 GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. PROJECT MGMT, CONSTRUCTION & INSPECTION SRVCS FOR REC &

AQUATICS CTR
209,437.91
3010-004470108792 SHAH KAWASAKI ARCHITECTS SHAH KAWASAKI ARCHITECTS FIRE STA 52 RENOVATION PROJ

DESIGN SRVCS
32,064.56
3010-004640106400 ZEIGER ENGINEERS, INC. ZEIGER ENGINEERS ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SRVCS TOM LARA

FIELD PARKING LOT
2,775.00
3010-004800108415 GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCTION, INC. GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCTION LARA FIELD PARKING LOT REHAB PROJ129,368.40 3010-004830109746 TWINING, INC. TWINING, INC CONSULTANT MATERIALS TESTING SRVCS LARA FIELD

PARKING LOT REHAB
18,173.67
3010-004870109771 CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC.,

LATHROP

LATHROP CONSTRUCTION ASSOC CONSTRUCTION SRVCS REC
/AQUATIC CENTER
34,282,633.04
3010-004900096893 WILSEY HAM WILSEY HAM ENGINEERING STAFF SUPPORT CIP PROJECTS 13,625.30 3010-004930104999 NINYO AND MOORE RAC PROJECT - NINYO & MOORE GEOTECH ENGINEERING SRVCS. 338,357.50 3010-004960109998 CPM ASSOCIATES, INC. CPM CONSULTNG SRVCS FOR SB RAC PROJECT MGMT 756,373.74 3010-005050109746 TWINING, INC. TWINING INC MATERIALS TESTING SRVCS SR CTR PARKING LOT &

TRASH ENCLOSURE
12,928.14
3310-000480105452 PAGE & TURNBULL, INC. RAC EIR CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURES 35,615.64 5110-000100106447 MOORE,IACOFANO, GOLTSMAN, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT

SERVICES
13,480.00
5110-000290109117 DENISE ENEA CONSULTINGFIRE MITIGATION CRESTMOOR CANYON PROJECT MANAGER 67,340.00 5110-000330106447 MOORE,IACOFANO, GOLTSMAN, INC. FLORIDA AVE PARK RESTART-FINALIZE CONSTRUCTION DOCS &

SUPPORT
32,455.00
3010-005100110240 GUERRA CONSTRUCTION GROUP GUERRA CONSTRUCTION SENIOR CTR PARKING LOT CONSTRUCT SRVCS
320,183.74
37,370,391.96$

108 of 157

203 Streets Improve. Projects Fund
3010-004250000430 DKS ASSOCIATES DKS ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC DESIGN ENGINEERING SRVCS FOR SBA &

CHERRY AVE
14,271.11
3010-004440095210 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC: PAVEMENT TESTING & EVAL SRVCS 2019 ST REHAB PROJ
11,560.00
3010-004450095210 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC: CONSULTANT SRVCS HUNTINGTON

SAN ANTONIO BIKE CORRIDOR
6,220.00
3010-004660018898 TJKM TRANSPORTATION

CONSULTANT

TJKM PROJ MGMT & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SRVCS STAFF

AUGMENTATION
2,522.75
3010-004820018898 TJKM TRANSPORTATION

CONSULTANT

TJKM CONSULTANT SRVCS TRAFFIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT VARIOUS

INTERSECTIONS
16,020.00
3010-004880109778 RIGHT OF WAY SERVICES, INC.,

ASSOCIATED

ASSOC RIGHT OF WAY SERVICES INC HUNTINGTON AVE CYCLE TRACK DRAFT
27,216.25
3010-004890107476 IDAX DATA SOLUTIONS 7-DAY SPEED SURVEY & TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR SELECT LOCATION 18,100.00 3010-004920098436 PROFESSIONAL LAND SERVICES PROFESSIONAL LAND SERVICES SURVEYING SRVCS BART ROW

TRANSFER
30,505.00
3010-004970108415 GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCTION, INC. GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCT INC SIDEWALK REPAIR SRVCS VARIOUS

LOCATIONS
3,750.00
3010-004980110078 ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN, INC. ALTA PLANNING & DESIGN SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN

DEVELOPMENT
131,911.19
3010-005000096946 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. HDR ENGINEERING SRVCS FOR HUNTINGTON BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN

IMP PROJ
628,854.34
3010-005010000430 DKS ASSOCIATES DKS TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN SRVCS OAK & CRYSTAL 117,463.00 3010-005040108415 GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCTION, INC. GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCT SRVCS SAN ANTONIO AVE

BICYCLE CORRIDOR PROJECT
607,728.74
3010-005060018898 TJKM TRANSPORTATION

CONSULTANT

TJKM TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SRVCS DEVELOP LOCAL ROADWAY

SAFETY PLAN
45,516.53
3010-005070109746 TWINING, INC. TWINING INC MATERIALS TESTING SRVCS HUNTINGTON BIKE PROJ 28,310.00 3010-005080105553 BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. BELLECCI & ASSOC DESIGN SRVCS TRANSIT CORRIDOR PED PROJECT19154.5 4800-000200109934 NEMA CONSTRUCTION NEMA CONSTRUCTION STREET LIGHT POLE REPLACEMENT 327,100.00 5110-000370018048 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC.,

CALLANDER ASSOCIATES
CALLANDER ASSOC. SRVCS FOR CENTENNIAL PLAZA PROJ. 44,945.96 2,081,149.37$
207 Technology Capital Fund
1250-000360018687 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC.TYLER CONTENT MANAGER AND OUTPUT PROCESSOR 3,300.75 1530-000870108691 BEAR CLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.BEAR CLOUD CISCO PHONE SYSTEM CITYWIDE UPGRADE 69,833.52 1530-000870108691 BEAR CLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.BEAR CLOUD CISCO PHONE SYSTEM CITYWIDE UPGRADE 65,500.00 1530-000910109226 NATIX, INC. NATIX QUOTE# NATIX-25775 LAPTOPS FOR EOC CIP PROJECT 9,940.03 148,574.30$
611 Water Fund
1210-000140098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC EXPERT PROJECT ADVISORY SERVICES TO THE SAN BRUNO PUBLIC

WORKS DEPARTMENT
1,907.50
1210-000200108425 GOOD CITY COMPANY PLANNING SERVICES TO EXAMINE POTENTIAL NEW LOCATION FOR

JOINT CORPORATION YARD
9,557.09
1510-000470017570 LEHR AUTO ELECTRIC FY18-19 LEHR OUTFIT NEW VEHICLES - PD/UTILITY 16,387.50

109 of 157

1520-000300109283 ODYSSEY POWER CORPORATIONODYSSEY ON CALL PW GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 14,693.29 3010-003150104660 WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING SVC TO DEVELOP COORDINATED INFRASTRUCTURE

WORK PLAN
12,510.51
3010-003460096458 RMC WATER AND ENVIRONMENTRMC WATER PREPARATION OF GROUNDWATER PLAN 36,648.75 3010-003850096458 RMC WATER AND ENVIRONMENTTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR GROUNDWATER STORAGE & RECOVERY PROJ
15,335.63
3010-004090104660 WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC. DESIGN OF THE AVES 1-3 SEWER/WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT

PROJECT
1,000.67
3010-004220108012 SALAS O'BRIEN SALAS O'BRIEN DESIGN AMD BID DOCUMENT SRVCS

WHITMAN/PRINCETON PUMP STATIONS PROJ
13,011.25
3010-004300108261 WOODARD & CURRAN WOODARD & CURRAN INC CONSULTANT SRVCS GROUNDWATER

STORAGE & RECOVERY PROJ
13,787.34
3010-004340105553 BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES, INC.DESIGN OF AVES 3-1 SEWER AND WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT 7,797.45 3010-004370105955 COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.,
WEST
WC3 STAFF AUGMENTATION, PLAN CHECK, LAND DEV SUPPORT
SRVCS
10,187.50
3010-004410096893 WILSEY HAM WILSEY HAM ENGINEERING SRVCS FOR AVES 2-1 & 2-2 SEWER/WATER

MAIN REPLACE
15,094.15
3010-004420108652 WATER WORKS ENGINEERS, LLC WATER WORKS ENGINEERING DESIGN SRVCS SNEATH & LAKE DR

PUMP STATION PROJ
217,539.05
3010-004490108798 CONSOLIDATED CM, INC. CONSOLIDATED CM, INC CONSTRUCT MGMT/INSPECTION SRVCS CUNNINGHAM WATER TANK #1
539,903.00
3010-004510104660 WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC. WEST YOST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SRVCS FOR SWEENEY RIDGE TANK 7 REPLACE PROJ
342,185.90
3010-004560017026 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.LYNX TECHNOLOGIES DOCUMENTS MANAGEMENT SRVCS 1,656.25 3010-004570018729 RANGER PIPELINES INC. RANGER PIPELINES CONSTRUCTION SRVCS AVES 1-3 SEWER/WATER

REPLACEMENT
116,157.60
3010-004610000272 BMI IMAGING SYSTEMS BMI IMAGING SYSTEMS TRANSFER DRAWING PLAN SETS TO

ELECTRONIC FILES
8,888.00
3010-004840000522 COUNTY WATER DISTRICT(NCCWD),

NORTH COAST
FY21-22 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WATER PURCHASE 64,566.10 3010-004860109759 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.,

LUHDORFF&SCALMANINI
LUHDORFF & SCALMANINI ENGINEERING DESIGN SRVCS 573,830.12 3010-004900096893 WILSEY HAM WILSEY HAM ENGINEERING STAFF SUPPORT CIP PROJECTS 7,327.89 3010-004990104327 EATON PUMP & SALES EATON PUMP SALES INC - SNEATH PUMP EVAL & REFURBISH PROJECT 103,529.13 3010-005110018331 CSG CONSULTANTS INC. CSG CONSULTANTS AVES 3-1 SEWER/WATER REPLACE PROJ 315,180.00 6110-001550104327 EATON PUMP & SALES EATON PUMPS WELL 17 10,462.00 6110-001550104327 EATON PUMP & SALES EATON PUMPS WELL 17 9,837.96 6110-001650103618 PETERSON POWER SYSTEMS, INC.PETERSON POWER 2089941 REPLACE ENGINE ECM 5,900.17 6110-001890109246 AQUA METRIC SALES, CO. AQUA METRIC AMSC PURCHASE COMM METERS 32,543.03 6110-001960104660 WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC.WEST YOST UPDATE WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN TO 62,652.44 6110-001970104327 EATON PUMP & SALES EATON PUMPS WELL 18 REPAIRS 12,835.00 6110-001990018090 HOPKINS TECHNICAL PRODUCTS,INCHOPKINS-WATER- STOCK SPARE PARTS SENSORS 2,902.91 6110-002000102989 CALIFORNIA DIESEL & POWERCD POWER RENTAL AGREEMENT 2100 SNEATH, 2200 SBA WATER 17,261.65 6110-002010109246 AQUA METRIC SALES, CO. AQUAMETRIC STOCK.PARTS FOR METER MAINTENANCE 57,181.78 6110-002040018188 DAU PRODUCTS DAU PRODUCTS DRINKING WATER TREATMENT 60,000.00 6110-002050000612 WESTVALLEY CONSTRUCTION WESTVALLEY WATER CONCRETE REPAIRS 134,083.15 6110-002060013683 F. FERRANDO & CO. FERRANDO WATER CONCRETE REPAIRS FY 21.22 4,175.00 6110-002080109246 AQUA METRIC SALES, CO. AQUA METRIC (1) 8" (1) 2" (5) 3" OMNI METER 18,349.14

110 of 157

6110-002090104660 WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC.WEST YOST AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES 11.15.21 5,304.00 6110-002110109246 AQUA METRIC SALES, CO. AQUA METRIC (1) 3", (1) 8" OMNI METERS 18,779.85 6110-002120104660 WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC.WEST YOST ANNUAL WATER SUPPLY DEMAND REPORT 8,844.00 6110-002130104781 BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATESBARTLE WELLS W/WW RATE STUDY UPDATE 30,000.00 6110-002140104660 WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC.WEST YOST ON CALL CONSULTING SERVICES 20,000.00 6310-001520015671 CONSTRUCTION, INC., TECHNOLOGY,

ENGINEERING &
TEC ACCUTITE CONST REPORTING MAINTENANCE REPAIR 13,537.45 3010-004850000074 SFPUC - WATER DEPARTMENTFY21-22 SFPUC WHOLESALE WATER PURCHASE 297,945.14 3,281,276.34$
621 Stormwater Fund
1210-000140098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC EXPERT PROJECT ADVISORY SERVICES TO THE SAN BRUNO PUBLIC

WORKS DEPARTMENT
272.50
3010-004380108472 FREYER & LAURETA, INC. SRVCS SPYGLASS DR STORMDRAIN IMPROVE PROJ 36,484.24 3010-004740105552 SCHAAF & WHEELER SCHAAF & WHEELER ENGINEERING SRVCS TRASH CAPTURE

FEASIBILITY STUDY
6,240.00
3010-004790109109 WRECO WRECO PRE-DESIGN SUPPORT SRVCS REGIONAL STORMWATER

CAPTURE PROJ
18,172.61
3010-004900096893 WILSEY HAM WILSEY HAM ENGINEERING STAFF SUPPORT CIP PROJECTS 47,280.72 6210-000490109122 ZERO TURN POWER WASHINGZERO TURN PRESSURE WASH DOWNTOWN SIDEWALK 18,733.00 127,183.07$
631 Wastewater Fund
1210-000140098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC EXPERT PROJECT ADVISORY SERVICES TO THE SAN BRUNO PUBLIC

WORKS DEPARTMENT
1,907.50
1210-000200108425 GOOD CITY COMPANY PLANNING SERVICES TO EXAMINE POTENTIAL NEW LOCATION FOR

JOINT CORPORATION YARD
9,557.09
1520-000300109283 ODYSSEY POWER CORPORATIONODYSSEY ON CALL PW GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 21,339.21 3010-003150104660 WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING SVC TO DEVELOP COORDINATED INFRASTRUCTURE

WORK PLAN
12,510.51
3010-003700105735 HYDROSCIENCE ENGINEERS, INC. CRESTWOOD PUMP STATION AND CRESTWOOD DRIVE SEWER REHAB

DESIGN PROJECT
167,426.10
3010-004090104660 WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC. DESIGN OF THE AVES 1-3 SEWER/WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT

PROJECT
1,000.68
3010-004340105553 BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES, INC.DESIGN OF AVES 3-1 SEWER AND WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT 8,494.28 3010-004370105955 COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.,
WEST
WC3 STAFF AUGMENTATION, PLAN CHECK, LAND DEV SUPPORT
SRVCS
10,187.50
3010-004410096893 WILSEY HAM WILSEY HAM ENGINEERING SRVCS FOR AVES 2-1 & 2-2 SEWER/WATER

MAIN REPLACE
213,101.56
3010-004560017026 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.LYNX TECHNOLOGIES DOCUMENTS MANAGEMENT SRVCS 1,656.25 3010-004570018729 RANGER PIPELINES INC. RANGER PIPELINES CONSTRUCTION SRVCS AVES 1-3 SEWER/WATER

REPLACEMENT
-60,012.69
3010-004610000272 BMI IMAGING SYSTEMS BMI IMAGING SYSTEMS TRANSFER DRAWING PLAN SETS TO

ELECTRONIC FILES
8,888.00
6110-002130104781 BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATESBARTLE WELLS W/WW RATE STUDY UPDATE 30,000.00 6210-000500108182 C2R ENGINEERING, INC. FY21-22 YEAR 4 OF 5 C2R ENGINEERING STORMWATER SPOT REPAIR. 60,000.00

111 of 157

6310-001520015671 CONSTRUCTION, INC., TECHNOLOGY,

ENGINEERING &
TEC ACCUTITE CONST REPORTING MAINTENANCE REPAIR 17,933.96 6310-001540000612 WESTVALLEY CONSTRUCTION
CO.INC
WESTVALLEY WW FY 21-22 (YEAR 4 OF 5) ON-CALL WASTEWATER

REPAIRS
274,769.46
6310-001550017928 THE EDCCO GROUP, INC. THE EDCCO GROUP WW W SCADA SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

CONSULTANT SERVICES
30,000.00
6310-001570102345 DUKE'S ROOT CONTROL, INC.DUKE'S ROOT CONTROL RAZOROOTER TREATMENT 9,465.01 6310-001580001327 PENINSULA PUMP & EQUIPMENT INC PENINSULA PUMP WW BACKUP PUMP FOR CRESTMOOR PS 12,642.79 830,867.21$
641 CityNet Services Fund
1530-000580108691 BEAR CLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 9.1.20-8.31.21 CISCO SYSTEMS RENEWAL & UPGRADES MAINTENANCE21,370.96 6410-005070109381 VMI INC CHANNEL 1 UPGRADE, VMI EQUIPMENT 10,109.55 6410-005110018767 MEGA HERTZ SATELITE DIGITAL RECEIVER 8,743.85 6410-005190109957 CORETECH LEASING, INC. A10 SERVER SUPPORT CORETECH LEASING 8,851.44 49,075.80$
701 Central Garage Fund
1210-000140098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC EXPERT PROJECT ADVISORY SERVICES TO THE SAN BRUNO PUBLIC

WORKS DEPARTMENT
272.50
1510-000610018622 INNER SPACE ENGINEERING CORP.INNER SPACE TOOL STORAGE LOCKER FOR CENTRAL GARAGE 25.00 6310-001520015671 CONSTRUCTION, INC., TECHNOLOGY,

ENGINEERING &
TEC ACCUTITE CONST REPORTING MAINTENANCE REPAIR 8,133.59 8,431.09$
702 Facility Maint. Fund
1210-000140098639 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC EXPERT PROJECT ADVISORY SERVICES TO THE SAN BRUNO PUBLIC

WORKS DEPARTMENT
272.50
1520-000350109532 MATRIX HG, INC. MATRIX HD HVAC EMERGENCY SR CTR REPLACEMENT 11,716.00 1520-000390109223 CAN DO FLOORING LLC CAN DO FLOORING 555 ECR FD LIVING QUARTERS 14,162.50 26,151.00$
703 General Equipment Revolving Fund
1510-000470017570 LEHR AUTO ELECTRIC FY18-19 LEHR OUTFIT NEW VEHICLES - PD/UTILITY 121,603.44 1510-000550018461 SERRAMONTE FORD, INC. SERRAMONTE FORD 2022 F250 TRUCK CSO 38,000.00 1510-000590108222 NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUPNATIONAL AUTO FLEET (6) PD UNITS 320,000.00 1510-000600110003 PB LOADER CORPORATIONPB LOADER PAVING TRUCK MEASURE G 210,000.00 1510-000620017570 LEHR AUTO ELECTRIC LEHR UPFITTING (6) PD UNITS 2 UTUBE 4 PD 144,482.75 1510-000630105711 STEPFORD 05.06.22 UPDATE PD UNITS 57,329.84 891,416.03$

112 of 157

707 Technology Development Fund
1530-000760109904 SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

REMOTE SATELLITE
REMOTE SATELLITE SYSTEMS IRIDIUM AIRTIME USAGE 1,000.00 1530-000950017679 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC CDW-G ADOBE ACROBAT PRO - 75 ENTERPRISE LICENSES 5,115.75 1530-000920018169 DELL MARKETING L.P. DELL TECHNOLOGIES POWEREDGE R650XS SERVER REPLACEMENTS 27,334.74 33,450.49$
TOTAL: 46,178,638.22$

113 of 157

City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report

CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:November 8, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Ryan Johansen, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Creation of a Parking Fund, Authorizing the Transfer of $331,000 From the Downtown Parking Program Capital Improvement Project Into the Parking Fund, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a 5-Year Contract With LAZ Parking in an Amount Not to Exceed $3,000,000 for Services Related to Parking Enforcement Following the Conclusion of the Meet and Confer Process per the Memorandum of Understanding Entered Into Between Police and the City
BACKGROUND:

In January 2019, the San Bruno Downtown Parking Management Plan was prepared by CDM Smith for the City of San Bruno. The study found in their existing conditions analysis that, “Concern over parking issues in downtown San Bruno has intensified over recent years and outreach efforts have found that residents generally find the current conditions unacceptable.

Population and job growth and housing costs have resulted in increased occupancy in the housing in surrounding neighborhoods, resulting in demand for parking that exceeds the existing supply.”
In its Strategic Initiatives for FY2021-22, the City Council included deployment of a downtown parking meter program, and enhancement of citywide parking enforcement capabilities. Based upon their clear areas of overlap, these two initiatives were combined into one joint project between Public Works and the Police Department, with the Police Department taking the lead.

On March 1, 2022, a Staff Report was presented to City Council on the Downtown Parking Meters and Enhanced Parking Enforcement Project. This report provided City Council with an update on staff’s progress toward establishing a metered parking program downtown. The report also provided information regarding the challenges and limitations of the police department’s current parking enforcement efforts due to limited staffing and court decisions that made it prohibitive to use the conventional tire chalking method for the enforcement of timed parking restrictions. In this report, staff advised City Council of its intention to recommend the establishment of a contracted partner company to augment its parking enforcement efforts, and to help facilitate enforcement of the metered parking program.

Following the above-mentioned meeting, Staff established a phased approach to implementation of the Downtown Parking Meters and Enhanced Parking Enforcement Project.

114 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 2 of 7 ends

Under this approach, the first phase would be to enhance existing parking enforcement capabilities to conduct citywide parking enforcement efforts. The second phase would be to establish a metered parking program and establish comprehensive wayfinding signage throughout the downtown area.

This Staff Report deals primarily with the implementation of the first phase of this project but will provide a high-level update on the second phase as well.

DISCUSSION:

As presented in the Staff Report on March 1, 2022, the City’s current parking enforcement efforts face many challenges, the first of which is staffing. The Police Department budget allows for two full-time Community Service Officers (CSOs) and three part-time CSOs assigned to the Traffic Section. These CSOs are tasked with parking enforcement throughout the entire city.

Those parking enforcement responsibilities include but are not limited to: responding to parking complaints, street sweeping enforcement, abandoned vehicle abatements and tows, proactive enforcement of blocked sidewalks/registration violations/wrong way parking, etc. The current staffing level does not allow for regular citywide parking enforcement, and parking enforcement is only one of the many critical functions that CSOs provide. CSOs are also responsible for providing traffic control at collision and hazard scenes, managing the police department’s vehicle fleet, assisting with evidence and property transports, taking low level police reports, running departmental errands, etc. CSOs are absolutely critical to police department operations and provide their services at a fraction of the cost of sworn peace officers. Additionally, CSO is an entry level position that is often occupied by aspiring police officers, which creates frequent turnover in the position. CSOs must undergo a full background investigation, which means that it can often take up to six months to complete a hiring process. All of these factors contribute to difficulty maintaining a fully staffed CSO team to provide their critical services to the City.

As discussed previously, another significant challenge in our current parking enforcement efforts pertains to court decisions that have made it untenable to conduct timed parking enforcement using the conventional method of chalking tires. Essentially, the courts have ruled that placing chalk on vehicle tires may constitute a seizure that is protected under the 4th Amendment. As such, enforcing timed parking restrictions such as those throughout the downtown area while minimizing legal exposure for the City requires the use of vehicle-based Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) systems. The police department does not presently possess ALPR systems on any of its parking enforcement vehicles, nor does it have access to the backend programs necessary to use ALPR data to conduct parking enforcement To ensure more adequate and equitable parking enforcement throughout the City, staff recommends establishing a contract partnership with LAZ Parking. LAZ Parking can quickly deploy staff to provide citywide parking enforcement and to enforce existing timed parking restrictions in the downtown area. Contracted parking enforcement services have been successful in other area cities, including San Mateo, which also partners with LAZ.

By outsourcing to a vendor who will be able to hire and maintain staff who are dedicated solely to parking enforcement duties, and who are operating ALPR equipped enforcement vehicles, the City will realize much more robust and extensive parking enforcement capabilities than current staffing and vehicles allow. It should be noted that the vendor has indicated that they do pre-screen and conduct background checks on their staff, however they do not conduct a full

115 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 3 of 7 ends

background investigation as is required for CSOs within the Police Department. Because of this, vendor staff can perform parking enforcement duties, but they cannot perform any of the other critical CSO duties as previously explained in this report. Due to the critical nature of all the services provided by CSOs, and the fact that there will be many activities that LAZ PEOs cannot conduct, the Police Department will need to maintain its authorized staffing of CSOs even as it established this contract partnership.

LAZ Parking has provided a proposal (attached to this Staff Report) to provide for the following:
•Four full-time Parking Enforcement Officers (PEOs) which would provide for parking enforcement coverage from Monday-Saturday from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM, with 2 - 4 PEOs working each day. The PEOs will wear LAZ Parking polo shirt uniforms, name tags and LAZ Parking badges. PEOs will be equipped with TurboData TicketPro electronic citation writers, identical to those already utilized by Police Department CSOs.

Having 2 - 4 full-time PERs working each day would allow for later enforcement hours to manage the heavy-use evening period in the downtown area, which is currently completely neglected due to limited staffing.
•City wide parking enforcement coverage during those days and times including responding to reported parking violations, timed parking enforcement, street sweeping enforcement, and other saturated parking enforcement based on the City’s needs.

Parking complaints may be reported by calling a dedicated phone number to reach LAZ staff or by using the San Bruno Responds application (Accela). •One Project Manager and one Regional Manager to manage all the services contracted to LAZ.
•Four ALPR-equipped parking enforcement vehicles which are typically Toyota Prius sedans. The vehicles will be marked as LAZ Parking vehicles, equipped with amber strobe lights, ALPR systems and a GPS tracking system. LAZ Parking is responsible for all vehicle maintenance and insurance. The ALPR system continually reads parked vehicles’ license plates and/or vehicle descriptions as a PEO drives the vehicle on patrol. The ALPR system will alert the PEO if it detects a possible vehicle that is parked beyond the allowed time limit or a vehicle that has not paid in a metered location. •A Parking Enforcement Office will be leased by LAZ Parking within the City to provide a location for their PERs to have a briefing, use a computer, take breaks, and provide parking for their vehicles.

This contract partnership for parking enforcement will immediately improve the overall parking situation throughout the city by establishing regular and consistent enforcement of a wide array of parking violations. This partnership will also enable the City to immediately return to enforcing the established timed parking restrictions throughout downtown and in other designated areas of the City, something that it has been unable to do for well over a year. The lack of enforcement of timed parking has exacerbated impacted parking problems, especially downtown where lack of available parking presents a series challenge for local businesses.

Additionally, the ALPR-based enforcement provided by LAZ will be absolutely essential to implementation of the second phase of this project, the installation of metered parking downtown, as well as to the establishment of permit parking districts.

116 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 4 of 7 ends

While it will not be covered extensively in this report, Staff is completing preparation work for the second phase of this project, the establishing of metered parking downtown. This second phase will include but not be limited to:
•Creating and adopting a City Ordinance authorizing metered parking, it’s enforcement and fines
•Installing approximately 84 T2 Cosmo pay station/kiosks •Deploying a cloud-based meter and permit monitoring system •Developing a branded wayfinding and other signage design solution •Removing current timed parking signage and installing compliant meter signage •Installing branded wayfinding signage
Establishing a Parking Fund will enable the City to fund the initial costs associated with both phases of this project, while establishing a location for the deposit of revenues associated with citations and meter fees, to help support the ongoing costs of the program, and other initiatives as directed by City Council.

Section 3.3.4 City Rights of the MOU states that prior to modification of contracting or subcontracting of operations currently being performed by the Police Department the City shall meet and confer with the union. The obligation of the City to meet and confer regarding the impacts of contracting operations currently performed by the police department shall not be construed to require the City and the Union reach agreement prior to the implementation of this type of modification. It is important to note the distinction between the obligation to Meet and Confer and Meet and Agree. To Meet and Confer in good faith means the mutual obligation to meet and confer in order to freely exchange information, opinions and proposals and to sincerely endeavor to reach agreement on matters within the scope of representation and discussion. This obligation does not compel either party to agree to a proposal or make a concession. After concluding the Meet and Confer process, the City may implement its proposal. Meet and Agree requires that the parties must reach agreement on the issue at hand.

Meet and Agree is not required for this modification in operations, but the bargaining unit has in fact agreed to this operational change, as noted in the following paragraph.

The Chief of Police has met and conferred with the San Bruno Police Association President and has shared the details of this proposed change in operations. The Association President shared these details with the Police Unit membership, which includes the existing Community Service Officers, and subsequently informed the Chief of Police that the bargaining unit supports this proposal. The Association President has since informed Teamsters of this supportive position and requested that Teamsters convey this support in any future communications with the City on this topic. Human Resources will complete the remainder of this Meet and Confer Process prior to moving forward with this contract.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The LAZ proposal is for a 5-year contract with an estimated total 5-year budget of $2,909,495.

Fees are paid to LAZ monthly, and the chart below indicates the anticipated monthly and annual costs over the five years of the contract

117 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 5 of 7 ends

Year Annual Costs Monthly Costs
1 $533,952 $44,496
2 $556,392 $46,366
3 $580,312 $48,360
4 $605,817 $50,485
5 $633,030 $52,753
The average monthly cost of this contract is $48,492/month.

The average monthly revenue from parking citations in San Bruno over the past five (5) years has been approximately $54,995/month, but it is important to note that these average monthly revenues are already accounted for and encumbered in the Police Department budget, and therefore cannot be directly used to offset the expense of this contract. That said, based upon deployment of similar programs in other jurisdictions the City can expect a substantial increase in citation revenue with the enhancement of enforcement through this contract partnership. LAZ Parking conducted an analysis of seven (7) of their parking enforcement contract locations in California and determined that in their first year of providing parking enforcement services, their clients increased their parking citation revenues from between 45% and 130%. This is a broad range because it is largely dependent upon the level of preexisting enforcement. As previously stated in this report, the current enforcement level here in San Bruno is quite minimal in terms of consistent citywide efforts. As such, it is likely that the increase in citation revenues that San Bruno would experience under this contract would be closer to the top end of this range. While compliance normally increases over time with steady parking enforcement, data from LAZ indicates that most cities experience a sustained increase of between 40% and 50% over existing revenue levels in subsequent years. While it is impossible to predict the exact increases that will be experienced here in San Bruno, the chart below provides a conservative but reasonable projection of the increased citation revenues against the estimated monthly cost of the program over the five-year contract term.

Year Monthly Vendor
Cost
Estimated Increase in
Monthly Citation Revenue
Estimated Net Fiscal
Impact Monthly
1 $44,496 $49,496 + $5,000
2 $46,366 $27,497 - $18,869
3 $48,360 $27,497 - $20,863
4 $50,485 $27,497 - $22,988
5 $52,753 $27,497 - $25,256
As the above chart indicates, the enhanced parking enforcement services are likely to result in a net average cost to the City of approximately $16,595/month, or approximately $200,000/year over the 5-year contract.

Again, it is important to note that given the relatively minimal level of enforcement currently being conducted, it is entirely likely that San Bruno will see notably larger increases in citation revenues than those utilized in the above chart. Additionally, the benefits of this enhanced enforcement are absolutely consistent with the recommendations from the San Bruno Downtown Parking Study Final Parking Management Plan, the Downtown Parking Meters and Enhanced Parking Enforcement Project, and City Council’s Strategic Initiatives for FY 2021-22.

118 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 6 of 7 ends

It is also important to recall that there are two phases to this project, and that Staff expects that the project as a whole, once fully deployed, and operational, will produce a net positive fiscal impact.

For Phase Two, there will be an initial capital improvement expense associated with purchasing and installing parking meters in and around the downtown area (estimated to be $1,000,000).

Once installed, the parking meters will generate substantial revenue for the City. Surveys of other cities reveal that each metered parking space is estimated to generate between $225 - $309 per month in meter revenue, and there are an estimated 839 parking spaces within the proposed metering area. This equates to between $188,775 - $259,251 per month, or between $2,265,300 - $3,111,012 annually, in estimated meter revenues. The chart below estimates the overall annual fiscal impact of this program, using the median of the estimated meter revenue range ($2,688,156). The estimated meter revenue and meter cost in Year One are zero as the meters are not likely to be installed until sometime later in that year.

Year Enforcement
Vendor Cost
Metering
Cost
Total Cost Increased
Citation
Revenue
Meter
Revenue
Total New
Revenue
Net Fiscal
Impact
1 $533,952 $0 $533,952 $593,952 $0 $593,952 $60,000
2 $556,392 $65,520 $608,218 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2,409,902 3 $580,320 $65,520 $645,840 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2,372,280 4 $605,820 $65,520 $671,340 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2,346,780 5 $633,036 $65,520 $698,556 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2,319,564 TOTAL $2,909,520.00 $262,080.00 $3,157,906.00 $1,913,808.00 $10,752,624.00 $13,722,384 $9,508,526 As the above chart illustrates, Staff estimates a net gain of approximately $9,508,526 over the 5-year term of the proposed contract. Even when accounting for the estimated cost of purchasing and installing meters ($1,000,000), there is an estimated net gain of approximately $8,508,526 over that 5-year period.

City Council previously allocated $331,000 to the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) for the Downtown Parking Program in the current CIP budget from the Streets Special Revenue Fund (Centrum Settlement). Staff recommends transferring the $331,000 in the CIP budget into the newly established Parking Fund, as all expenses and revenues related to the proposed LAZ contract for parking enforcement, parking meter installation as well as citation and future parking meter revenue will be accounted for in the fund. As illustrated in the final chart above, increased citation revenues are projected to offset the entirety of this expense over the course of the year, and those revenues will be deposited into the newly established Parking Fund as they come in. That said, citation revenues are not received in real-time and it will take some time for LAZ to put all of its resources in place.

The initial seed funding of $331,000 in the Parking Fund will provide sufficient funds to cover the LAZ contract for the remainder of the 2022-23 fiscal year. Staff intends to come back to City Council with recommendations regarding the FY 2023-24 Parking Fund Budget as well as funding for Phase Two, including the projected $1M cost for the purchase and installation of parking meters in the coming months.

119 of 157

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 8, 2022

Page 7 of 7 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

There is no environmental impact.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a resolution authorizing the creation of a Parking Fund, authorizing the transfer of $331,000 from the Downtown Parking Program Capital Improvement Project into the Parking Fund, and authorizing the City Manager to execute a 5-year contract with LAZ parking in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 for services related to parking enforcement following the conclusion of the Meet and Confer Process per the Memorandum Of Understanding Entered Into Between Police and the City
ALTERNATIVES:

1. Take no action now and pause Phase 1 of the Downtown Parking Meters and Enhanced Parking Enforcement Project, until the implementation of parking meters (Phase 2) is underway.

2. Direct staff not to execute a contract with LAZ parking and identify an alternative vendor or staffing plan following the conclusion of the Meet and Confer process per the Memorandum Of Understanding entered into between Police and the City

3. Take no action and continue limited parking enforcement with available Police Department Community Service Officers and do not proceed with parking meter installation.

4. Request additional information from Staff prior to taking action.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. LAZ Proposal for Parking Enforcement Services

3. T2 Systems Proposal for Parking Meter Program

120 of 157

1 0
9 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -

ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF A PARKING FUND, AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF $331,000 FROM THE DOWNTOWN PARKING

PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT INTO THE PARKING FUND, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A 5-YEAR CONTRACT WITH LAZ PARKING IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,000,000 FOR

SERVICES RELATED TO PARKING ENFORCEMENT FOLLOWING THE

CONCLUSION OF THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS PER THE

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ENTERED INTO BETWEEN POLICE AND

THE CITY
WHEREAS, in January 2019, the San Bruno Downtown Management Plan was prepared by CDM Smith for the City of San Bruno.

WHEREAS, the Downtown Management Plan found in their existing conditions analysis that, “Concern over parking issues in downtown San Bruno has intensified over recent years and outreach efforts have found that residents generally find the current conditions unacceptable. Population and job growth and housing costs have resulted in increased occupancy in the housing in surrounding neighborhoods, resulting in demand for parking that exceeds the existing supply.” WHEREAS, on March 1, 2022, a staff report was presented to City Council on the Downtown Parking Meters and Enhanced Parking Enforcement Project and the report provided City Council with an update on staff’s progress toward establishing a metered parking program downtown;
WHEREAS, following Council direction at the March 1, 2022, staff established a phased approach to implementation of the Downtown Parking Meters and Enhanced Parking Enforcement Project. Under this approach, the first phase would be to enhance existing parking enforcement capabilities to conduct citywide parking enforcement efforts. The second phase would be to establish a metered parking program and establish comprehensive wayfinding signage throughout the downtown area;
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, a staff report was presented to City Council that provided an update on the project to install Downtown Parking Meters and Enhanced Parking Enforcement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Bruno City Council authorizes the creation of a Parking Fund and the transfer of $331,000 from the Downtown Parking Program Capital Improvement Project into the Parking Fund.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Bruno that it hereby authorizing the City Manager to execute a 5-year contract with LAZ parking in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 for services related to

121 of 157

1 0
9 1
parking enforcement following the conclusion of the Meet and Confer Process per the Memorandum of Understanding Entered Into Between Police and the City.

Dated: November 8, 2022
—oOo—
I hereby certify that foregoing Resolution No. 2022 - ____ was adopted by the San Bruno City Council at a regular meeting on November 8, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT:Councilmembers:

ATTEST:
________________________________
Vicky Hasha, Deputy City Clerk

122 of 157

Proposal for Parking Enforcement Services
City of San Bruno Police Department
Submitted by:

LAZ Parking
1730 South Amphlett Boulevard, San Mateo, CA, 94402

123 of 157

October 27, 2021

Lieutenant Gene Wong
San Bruno Police Department
1177 Huntington Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066

Reference: Parking Enforcement Services

Dear Mr. Wong,

LAZ Parking is pleased to submit our proposal for Parking Enforcement and related services for the City of San Bruno Police Department.

Our local presence and proven track record make us the ideal company to serve the San Bruno Police Department for its parking enforcement and parking compliance needs. Providing exceptional service is not just something we do; it is who we are. We trust that this has been clearly demonstrated by our past success throughout California, as well as by our vision for what can be done in the years ahead in the area.

LAZ Parking offers our customers turnkey parking enforcement solutions that are designed to provide fair and consistent enforcement to improve the quality of life in the communities we serve, with reliable and cost-efficient service-led program management. LAZ has a seasoned, experienced, and realistic understanding of the challenges specific to your operations. We take pride in our delivery of superior service to our customers, and we hope to develop a longstanding partnership with the City of San Bruno and the San Bruno Police Department. If we are given the opportunity to serve the City, we are prepared to align our efforts with your enforcement objectives to deliver high-quality results and value for you.

Please do not hesitate to contact me at 714.290.4854 or via email at [email protected], should you have any questions or need additional information.

Sincerely,

m. mansoor

Muhammad Mansoor
Vice President

124 of 157

Section 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

UNDERSTANDING OF THE CITY’S INTENT AND OBJECTIVES
The San Bruno Police Department is conducting preliminary research and is looking for a successful partnership with a reputable and financially stable professional company with demonstrated skills and technical ability that provides high levels of customer service and satisfaction to fulfill the parking enforcement needs. The challenge is finding a firm that can mirror department’s processes for screening, hiring and training professionals that can deliver consistent level of service and follow San Bruno Police Department’s pledge to improve the quality of life for everyone who lives, works, and does business in the community. Furthermore, we
understand that it is your desire to provide a focused
approach to parking enforcement to improve compliance and better response time for calls for service to ensure citizen satisfaction. To achieve this goal, you need stability and consistency in parking enforcement activities so the needs of the department, the citizens and visitors can be addressed in a timely manner. This is the only way to manage a comprehensive parking enforcement program.

OUR QUALIFICATIONS TO ACHIEVE THE CITY’S OBJECTIVES
We have a strong track record of collaborating with our clients, bringing innovation and professionalism to each client we serve. As a company at the forefront of parking systems, LAZ exceeds the minimum qualifications required to support this project. We provide a broad range of experience and proven success we have achieved in wider on street parking markets. Our longstanding relationship with many cities and government agencies across North America is a testament to our commitment to our clients. Our experience in parking enforcement and related services is unmatched, more specifically, our footprint in CA. Collectively, across the United States, LAZ is the premium provider of parking enforcement services. Today, we issue and manage close to 1 million parking tickets per year – more than any other contractor in privatized municipal operations. We have been an effective, committed, and dedicated partner in the overall success of our customers. Our knowledge of local and national parking enforcement standards comes from over 40 years of working with city governments across the United States. As a full- service parking management company, we understand the benefits of a well-managed enforcement program and consistent execution of parking enforcement. LAZ has transitioned multiple comparable enforcement programs in the past. Within CA, we currently provide parking enforcement services for the cities of San Mateo, Palo Alto, Salinas, Inglewood, West Hollywood and Santa Ana.

OUR PROPOSED APPROACH
In keeping with San Bruno PD’s mission “We are dedicated to preserving our community’s peace while adhering to the highest level of ethical standards and professional conduct.”, LAZ is ideally suited to represent San Bruno Police Dept. in its efforts to facilitate effective functioning and development of the community through delivery of quality citywide parking enforcement WHY LAZ?
Qualifications - Unmatched parking enforcement
experience. We issue approximately 1.5 million
parking citations annually with an average dismissal
rate of < 5%
CA Specific Knowledge – Proven track record with
comparable contracts throughout CA
Analytics & Innovation – Offer Data Visualization
Tools and Dashboards to monitor KPIs and
Performance Metrics
Best in Class Processes – Deployment Strategies,
Route Optimization, Online Training, Strict SOPs
and Community Outreach Programs
Corporate Resources – Financial Stability, Support
Services, Audit & Transparency

125 of 157

services. LAZ fully understands the challenging environment of providing on-street enforcement services year-round, in diverse and sometimes challenging conditions. Our expertise centers on supporting large-scale municipal on-street parking operations. We possess the specific processes for screening, hiring, motivating, training, optimizing routes, and maintaining quality controls to meet performance and financial objectives.

HOW OUR PROPOSED APPROACH ACHIEVES CITY’S OBJECTIVES
Our approach to achieving the City’s objectives is based on efficiency and automation. LAZ’s plan revolves around proven and tested processes for performance measurement. Drawing on our local and international experience, our approach revolves around the following; Management Team Made up of Seasoned Parking Professionals To make this program a success right from the start, we have put together a team of professionals with a combined municipal parking experience of over 200 years and hands on knowledge of managing complex parking enforcement programs. This leaves no transition risk and ensures continuity of operations and enhancement of enforcement based on specific CA experience.

Believe staff selection and training is a high priority We employ multiple methods to carefully select the most qualified enforcement personnel, train and educate the workforce, and provide them with tools needed to succeed. We have the capacity and the flexibility to scale up rapidly to accommodate special events or supplemental enforcement requests with over 150 trained personnel within a 20-mile radius of San Bruno.

Strict Quality Control Procedures
Our proven and field-tested Standard Operating Procedures translate into strict Quality Control efforts. We proudly maintain our ticket accuracy performance above 97 percent. Ticket accuracy equates to fewer administrative hearings, improved program reputation, and enhanced collection revenues. Additional benefits include improved officer productivity, consistency, and customer service.

Technology Driven Solutions
Building upon our existing data capture and reporting methods, LAZ has invested in automated systems with our Business Intelligence tool, which enables our clients and management to view performance measurement in real-time.

CONCLUSION
We love working with progressive and innovative cities like San Bruno who embrace the changes required for growth while still honoring their values. With this attitude, a partnership with LAZ can transform San Bruno parking enforcement program into an efficient program that is manageable, sustainable, profitable. We have done it for other cutting-edge programs including San Mateo, West Hollywood, and Inglewood. If you are ready to improve the overall citizen experience and increase your enforcement activities within the first year of implementation, we are ready to take you there. We are eager to discuss in detail our approach to managing each step towards that goal, and what you can expect along the way. But your biggest expectation should be one of success. Let’s make it happen. Let’s get San Bruno parking enforcement program on the map of leading enforcement programs in California.

126 of 157

Section 2. MANAGEMENT PLAN AND METHODOLOGY

2.1 UNDERSTANDING OF SCOPE OF WORK AND OBJECTIVES TO BE ACHIEVED The City of San Bruno is a vibrant mixed residential and commercial community. Parking enforcement services are currently provided and managed by the San Bruno Police Department.

In the past 3 years, total citations issued were as follows: [2018 – 14498], [2019 – 17370] and [2020 – 10370]. Street sweeping and timed parking enforcement are the most common parking citations. In 2019, the department lost both of their GO-4 parking enforcement vehicles to collisions. Those vehicles allowed their CSO’s to chalk vehicles while driving. Without those vehicles, they couldn’t do consistent timed parking enforcement on El Camino Real and could only do timed parking enforcement in the downtown area and City Parking lots by walking a route once or twice a day instead of the three passes they were doing before. In 2018, the City started a “parked blocking the sidewalk” education and warning campaign followed by saturated enforcement. Many of the driveways in San Bruno are too short to fully accommodate vehicles; the vehicles extend over the sidewalk and block access for pedestrians. Likewise in 2019, the City started a “parked the wrong way” warning campaign followed by a saturated enforcement period which the reason for the increase in citations in 2019. These two violations were not very proactively enforced before these campaigns; however, they are now regularly as they are of great concern to many residents. CSOs are often pulled out of their normal enforcement routes to perform other duties. To ensure consistency in parking enforcement activities, the City is looking for a successful partnership with a reputable company with demonstrated skills and technical ability that provides high levels of customer service and satisfaction to fulfill the parking enforcement needs of the residents and business community.

2.2 METHODOLOGY AND PROPOSED APPROACH
To meet these objectives, it is LAZ’s commitment to provide a knowledgeable, well-trained, and motivated team focused on a balanced approach of fair and consistent parking enforcement. We have dedicated ourselves to providing professional and ethical parking enforcement services with the goal of improving the overall safety and quality of life for residents, visitors, and businesses in the cities we service. LAZ’s years of industry experience has given us firsthand knowledge of the most important aspects of providing parking services. We have taken the time to develop and refine best practices for every detail related to the delivery of our services. We make a crucial, noticeable difference by offering better processes with a proactive management style and through a comprehensive employee screening, onboarding, and training process. These capabilities come only through experience, knowledge, forethought, practice, and discipline. The highlighted areas of this section further illustrate our approach to organizing and implementing the parking enforcement services desired by the City and the ways in which we differentiate from our competitors and deliver higher quality.

The City of San Bruno Police Department has identified the primary enforcement responsibilities to include enforcement of no-parking zones, street sweeping, time-restricted parking, and enforcement of metered areas in the future. Additional essential duties could include responding to parking or vehicle complaints such as blocked driveways, conduct traffic control as directed by the department, and participate in special events, and other duties as assigned.

LAZ recognizes that fair, equitable, and consistent enforcement of these regulations help improve quality of life within the city. It is important that City streets are not used for long term

127 of 157

parking, taking up much needed parking for residents and businesses. These conditions also invite crimes of opportunity such as thefts of property from motor vehicles and vandalism. LAZ staff will be trained to identify such vehicles and report them to SBPD. As an additional benefit, LAZ parking enforcement personnel will also identify and report any unlawful act, condition, or deficiency that may pose a hazard or danger to the public. This includes missing, damaged, obstructed, or conflicting parking signs and curb markings. We will provide parking enforcement services utilizing the best methods suited for the situation. These services include vehicular patrol to maximize the range of enforcement and foot patrols in high occupancy, congested areas such as business district. Foot patrols will also enable parking enforcement representatives to become better acquainted with citizens and business owners. We put an emphasis on the importance of maximizing enforcement coverage and parking compliance. To achieve this goal, LAZ has strict controls in place that ensure the issuance of quality citations. Quality citations not only address parking issues, but they also help to reduce complaints and encourage compliance.

LAZ will first meet with the City to identify parking issues, public concerns, and the City’s enforcement policies and practices to develop a focused value based approached to enforcement.

LAZ’s value-based service ensures everyone is treated fairly and with courtesy while addressing parking problems.

To achieve maximum enforcement, compliance, and revenue generation, LAZ will also rely on our multi-step audit program and Quality Control (QC) process that include sampling of daily citations and corrective actions including retraining of staff for officer errors. With regular quality checks and strict controls, we minimize both officer error and the dismissal rates, which results in maximizing collections on tickets issued. LAZ is aware that enforcement of parking regulations is only one part of the parking enforcement process. The California Vehicle Code affords those who have received a parking citation a fair and impartial adjudication process. LAZ personnel will be properly trained to assist the public with questions regarding the procedure to contest a parking citation. Staff will also be properly trained to participate in court testimony or hearing or subsequent process involving a contested or challenged parking citation. We recognize that proper initial and ongoing training is critical to providing excellent service.

Inadequately trained personnel are more likely to make mistakes that unnecessarily inconvenience the public we serve. Citation errors also negatively affect LAZ and the City’s credibility. As such, we remain committed to providing our staff with initial and continuing training as described later in this section.

2.3 FAIR AND CONSISTENT PARKING ENFORCEMENT – “CREATING A CULTURE OF COMPLIANCE”
Parking Enforcement is an essential function of any on -street parking system. However, a successful parking enforcement program should not be defined solely by the volume of citations issued or revenue generated through parking violations . At LAZ, we take a comprehensive approach, utilizing our national experience and best industry practices to create a culture of compliance. The ultimate goal of improved compliance and adherence to time restrictions is to generate turnover of the highest demanded parking s paces and to improve quality of life within the City in the case of street sweeping . LAZ's commitment is to provide a customer -centric approach to parking enforcement. Unlike traditional parking enforcement programs, our approach focuses on public education as well as business and community outreach, fostering increased compliance without alienating us from the community. LAZ will provide a team of parking enforcement ambassadors that will not only be trained on the fundamentals of customer service,

128 of 157

but it will also provide a uniformed and highly visible presence for aiding citizens and visitors every day. Some typical examples of our enforcement services include:
• Providing brochures, directions, or a map to someone looking for a particular place of interest (e.g., Restaurant, Administration, Library, etc.). • Aiding customers with changing flat tires or jump starting a dead battery. • Calling for Police assistance or reporting suspicious activity. • Providing a friendly explanation of why a vehicle received a ticket. • Explaining the appeals process to a citizen or visitor that received a ticket. • Visiting merchants to discuss any problems or concerns in a proactive and professional manner.
• Actively participating in merchant association and civic meetings.

Another part of our customer-centric approach will be to assist the City with administrative review process to address citations that may be unwarranted. This administrative review will allow us to correct matters associated with inadequate signage, malfunctioning meters, handicap parking and similar violations that should not burden the courts.

2.4 USE OF LPR TECHNOLOGY FOR TIMED PARKING

ZONES AND PERMITTED AREAS
Our proposed management plan for San Bruno includes
implementation of cutting edge LPR technology and to equip our parking enforcement officers with GPS-enabled license plate scanners and data analytics tools that can identify a parked car that hasn’t moved within the restricted time limits and confirm whether a tire has rotated at all. This will also enable our enforcement personnel to cover more curb miles resulting in an increase in patrol passes of each patrol area. Use of LPR technology will allow Digital Time Marking of vehicles parked in timed parking zones without a need to use physical chalking of tires, a traditional method that is under scrutiny and legal review. Two federal lawsuits have been recently filed claiming that the use of chalk to mark tires for tickets in San Francisco and other cities tickets is unconstitutional because it is violation of drivers’ Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures.

2.5 COMPLIANCE WITH SCOPE OF WORK
We understand that the primary goal is to provide parking enforcement services to cover citywide street sweeping routes and enforce all timed parking areas including City lots and city streets with timed parking restrictions. We recognize that some of the City’s requirements may evolve over time such as enforcement of Residential Permit Areas and any curbs or lots that are converted to paid parking in the future. We believe that our approach of giving extensive autonomy to our Project Manager and Regional Manager will enable us to respond to evolving requirements quickly and effectively over the term of the contract. Many of the tasks and methodologies described in this section are performed by our staff at our other parking enforcement contracts such as in the neighboring City of San Mateo. We have drawn upon our extensive experience to present the highest quality and most cost-effective operational proposal.

129 of 157

We have a thorough understanding of the work and responsibilities that the provision of parking enforcement services for the City of San Bruno entails. As a full-service enforcement provider, we do not foresee major difficulties in meeting the requirements contained in the scope.

2.5.1 Task 1 – Parking Enforcement Responsibilities

2.5.1.1 Enforcement Areas
Timed Parking Enforcement Routes
• Route #1 - El Camino Real; Lot 1; Lot 2 (2 hour); Angus Ave; Sylvan Ave; Easton Ave; Lot 8; Kains Ave; Library Lot; Jenevein Ave; San Mateo Ave; Hensley Ave; San Bruno Ave; Green Ave; Easton Ave; Lot 2 (5 hour); Lot 3; Lot 4; Lot 5; Lot 7; Lot 6 • Route #2 – El Camino Real; Lot 1; Lot 2 (2 hour and 5 hour); Lot 3; Lot 4; Lot 5; Lot 7; Angus Ave; Sylvan Ave; Lot 6; San Bruno Ave; Easton Ave; Lot 8; Kains Ave; Library Lot; Jenevein Ave; San Mateo Ave; Hensley Ave; Green Ave; Easton Ave

City Parking Lots – Timed Parking
• Lot 1 – 415 Mastick Ave/ Taylor Ave - 2 hour
• Lot 2 - Mastick Ave/ Cypress Ct – Half 2 hour / Half 5 hour • Lot 3 – 495 Mastick Ave/ Sylvan Ave SB - 5 hours
• Lot 4 – 521 Mastick Ave/ Sylvan Ave NB - 5 hour
• Lot 5 – 571 Mastick Ave/ Angus Ave/ Maryland Pl - 5 hour • Lot 6 – 481 Sylvan Ave /Green Ave - 5 hour
• Lot 7 – 381 W. Angus Ave /Easton Ave - 5 hours
• Lot 8 - 659 San Mateo Ave - 2 hour
Street Sweeping Enforcement
• 1st & 3rd Mon: 0900-1100 hours, 1100-1300 hours
• 1st & 3rd Tue: 0600-0700 hours, 0900-1100 hours, 1100-1300 hours • 1st & 3rd Wed: 0500-1330 hours
• 1st & 3rd Thu: 0500-1330 hours
• 1st & 3rd Fri: 0900-1100 hours (Shelter Creek Ln, just one street)

2.5.1.2 General Responsibilities
Parking Enforcement Representative Responsibilities
• Enforce Municipal and State Vehicle Codes related to parking and registration violations issues citations and tows vehicles as required
• Provide traffic control assistance to the Police Department upon request • Patrol City streets, parking lots, future RPP and parking metered areas for parking violations or abandoned vehicles
• Receive and respond to radio calls for parking related complaints • Assist citizens with parking and traffic issues or questions • Report circumstances requiring police action
• Report safety hazards

130 of 157

• Report damaged equipment, unclear signage or street markings, and missing, damaged or conflicting parking signs or traffic control signs
• Report parking abnormalities or abnormal parking patterns • Provide beat analysis and report malfunctioning parking meters

Day in the Life of a PER. Daily Enforcement Flowchart Translates into High Quality.

2.5.1.3 Officers to use ‘San Bruno Responds’ App powered by ACCELA for Calls for Service and to Reporting Deficiencies
Since our officers are out in the field and enforcing regulations, it is important for them to report any irregularities such as faded signs or curbs and respond to any calls for service using the City of Bruno public response app, ‘San Bruno Responds’. Our officers will be required to check the City app once per hour at a minimum and respond to parking issues accordingly as directed by City of San Bruno. LAZ has had experience using similar apps in other California cities including hands on experience with Accela Inc. application which is used in the City of West Hollywood. At our other contracts, we report various deficiencies, including trees blocking signs, abandoned bulky items, broken meters, and missing or damaged signs. LAZ has also worked with handheld software providers to add the City Apps onto all the handhelds, yielding statistics summarized in the sample report in Exhibit 2-1 below.

131 of 157

Exhibit 2-1. Accela App Submissions from WHPE

2.5.1.4 Citation Issuance
PERs will be trained on issuing citations electronically using Turbo Data TicketPro handhelds which also has the capability of capturing digital photos of each violation. Our officers will also be trained on completing handwritten citations legibly. Prior to deployment each day, during morning briefing, any out of the ordinary situations are discussed and all exceptions, if any, for any violations will be given to staff by shift lead such as “do no cite” pass-downs by SBPD.

Turbo Data has the ability to provide report separating citations issued by LAZ enforcement staff and citations issued by SBPD staff.

2.5.1.5 Level of Service
As part of our due diligence, our team drove all areas of the City multiple times to determine the best staffing schedule that would provide a level of service that promotes a positive parking experience for the constituents and visitors of San Bruno. We understand the scope of the project and can also foresee the need for additional enforcement services that may not have been realized with a minimum level of staffing. We have experienced firsthand an increase in both citation issuance and demand for additional enforcement services in the cities of San Mateo, Palo Alto, Salinas, Inglewood, and Santa Ana, all of these are first time outsourced programs.

In the baseline schedule, the scope of work would be divided among 4 full time PERs with one of them acting as a lead PER. Full time PERs will be on a 40 hours per week schedule with approximately 1,920 annual productive hours. In addition, 2 Part Time PERs from our San Mateo program will be added each 1st and 3rd Monday; and each 1st and 3rd Tuesday to supplement street sweeping enforcement. With dozens of trained officers in the area, we are in a unique position to ramp up staffing and have the ability to scale up quickly should the demand for enforcement increase over time. Cost of any additional enforcement hours will be calculated and billed at the proposed PER Time & Material (T&M) man hour rate as presented in the Cost Proposal.

132 of 157

2.5.2 Task 2 – Equipment

2.5.2.1 Vehicles
LAZ will furnish four (4) parking enforcement vehicles for parking enforcement activities based on the proposed staffing plan. With the approval of the City, it is our intent to supply 2021 model Toyota Prius sedans. In addition, it is our plan to consider alternative means of transportation, such as bicycle(s), in areas
where automobile enforcement
is not practical.

Global Positioning System
(GPS)
Each vehicle will be equipped
with GPS tracking devices. This
type of tracking system will
provide up to 60-second updates
on vehicle and phone
movement, driving behavior, and
idle times and send alerts to emails and cell phones for infraction of a set rule. The ability to monitor movement and driving behavior and patterns of enforcement officers will allow management to address issues promptly, create efficiencies, and improve officer productivity.

Not only does the system provide a live feed of vehicle activity, but also records are archived in case of complaints (e.g., for driving over the speed limit or skipping violating vehicles). The record can be traced back to the driving officer’s activity for that day and time.

Safety Lights
All vehicles will be mounted with Alternating Quad
Flash Strobe Magnetic Mount in Amber. These lights
will be used when staff is patrolling to warn other
vehicles about their vehicle’s slower movement.

Vehicle Marking
LAZ will obtain City approval prior to ordering decals
for the marking of all vehicles. All vehicles will have markings clearly identifying all LAZ vehicles. The
rear of all patrol vehicles will have a sign warning of frequent vehicle stops. We propose a sign for driver
and passenger side of each vehicle with marking
similar to the sample vehicle picture shown here.

The vehicles will also have “CAUTION” and “Frequent Stops” on the rear lid and unit numbers on the rear lid and sides near the rear of the vehicle.

133 of 157

Vehicle Maintenance Plan
LAZ takes pride in delivering our very
best to our customers and clients. This is
reflected in how we carry ourselves, our
clean uniforms, and the proper care of
equipment, including our vehicles. Our
enforcement vehicles reflect the detail and
care we take in every aspect of our business. LAZ will provide new, eco-friendly Toyota Prius sedans for this contract and will take measured steps to ensure these vehicles are well maintained and presentable to the public.

The fleet maintenance plan will include a monthly record of maintenance performed on each vehicle by Date, Unit number, Vendor, maintenance performed, and cost. A vehicle inspection log is incorporated in the Officer Daily Log to document daily vehicle inspections. Parking enforcement representatives and lead are responsible for daily inspections of the vehicles and supervisors are responsible for weekly vehicle maintenance inspections.

Daily Vehicle Inspection
Pre- and post-shift visual inspection conducted by the lead officer along with the parking enforcement representative and notated on the vehicle inspection form. Once the inspection is complete, both supervisor and P.E.R. initial the inspection form.
• Visually inspect the vehicle for physical damage and
notated on the form
• Visually inspect to ensure brake lights, running lights, turn signals, windshield wiper and amber lights are working
properly
• Visually inspect tires to ensure they are properly inflated, and tread level is acceptable • Visually inspect to ensure vehicles are equipped with proper safety kits, including first aid, cones, and hazard marking devices such as flares
• Visually inspect the interior of the vehicle for cleanliness Future Integration with Mobile LPR
Our proposed vehicles are also suitable for deployment of mobile LPR. We currently use Toyota Prius at most of our contracts including San Mateo with ALPR units mounted on each unit. The interior and exterior design of the vehicle allows for easy placement of the LPR equipment both inside and outside of the vehicle.

2.5.2.2 Communication and Citation Issuance Equipment
LAZ in partnership with Turbo Data Systems, Inc. plan to provide the needed quantity of handheld electronic ticket writers, software, and printers. We will provide 4G rugged smartphones to each officer which can be used for data and voice also eliminating the need for officers to carry multiple devices for ticket issuance and communication. These smart phones will be locked down and secured limiting what apps can be used. The ticketPRO Magic parking app will be installed and configured with the City of San Bruno information by Turbo Data.

Remote support and remote upgrade will be available on each phone. Turbo Data will provide

134 of 157

complete configuration and set up of each unit at the start of the program. We have also opted to include an extended warranty for the printer which is highly recommended for hassle free operation. Turbo Data solution operates in real-time and sends data immediately to our cloud platform. Additionally, Turbo Data Systems has integrated with most parking PARCS and technology vendors and all major LPR technology vendors. For communication purposes, each smart phone will be set up with a push-to-talk application (similar to a two-way radio) and group texting capability using Microsoft Team for pass downs and group messaging. It is our intent to provide City’s designated program representative or command center with one smart phone with the same push-to-talk app as the field personnel to enable two way communication between City and LAZ field personnel.

2.5.2.3 Parking Enforcement Office
As requested, we are providing estimated
pricing for office location(s) within the
City. It will be our recommendation to have
contract staff work out of a dedicated
office. This will ensure PERs are able to clock in/out, attend daily briefing, to be able to use a computer and have a breakroom to take their lunch breaks. In a few of our contracts, where we share space with City personnel, it becomes a distraction for City staff to see PERs go in and out of their offices. As requested, we have included average cost of office space (facility rent and OPEX) in the pricing options. In our survey, we identified multiple available office options but 4 that are most suitable. Below is a snapshot of the market survey we recently conducted.

Property Address Space Details Estimated Monthly Rent
1590 El Camino Real, San Bruno, CA 94066 1st Fl, Ste D $2,750 1,100 SF
Negotiable
$30.00 /SF/YR
Triple Net (NNN)
881-883 Sneath Ln, San Bruno, CA 94066 1st Fl, Ste 190 $2,599 912 SF
Negotiable
$34.20 /SF/YR
881-883 Sneath Ln, San Bruno, CA 94066 2nd Fl, Ste 203 $3,953 1,387 SF
Negotiable
$34.20 /SF/YR
881-883 Sneath Ln, San Bruno, CA 94066 2nd Fl, Ste 225 $4,332 1,520 SF
Negotiable
$34.20 /SF/YR
San Bruno Office Lease Survey
Estimated Budget

135 of 157

2.5.2.4 Other Equipment
LAZ will also provide enforcement personnel with all necessary equipment and supplies needed for parking enforcement services. LAZ will supply the needed quantity of safety vests, chalks, flashlights, whistles. Each enforcement vehicle will also be equipped with safety kits and cones.

For the office, Timeforce (biometrics) clock, computers, printers, and company issued laptop is provided to the Site Manager for remote management of the program while off site.

2.5.3 Task 3 - Hiring of Personnel - Recruiting, Onboarding, and Employee Development

2.5.3.1 Employment Requirements
Building a strong, skilled workforce that
understands their roles and
responsibilities is just part of what LAZ
does. We continue to foster the
employees we have throughout our
projects and carefully select new
employees as positions become available.

All new employees will meet all City and
LAZ employment requirements. LAZ
will comply with all existing Government
Code and City of San Bruno policies.

LAZ will also comply with all the City’s
standards and requirements for
employees. Further, the City reserves the
right to refuse or revoke, at any time, a contractor’s employee from performing services in San Bruno with proper reason.

All new employees will go through a thorough pre-screen process, and only candidates with the highest likelihood of being successful will be selected. Our Senior Recruiter will spearhead our recruiting efforts and will solicit directly from multiple resources including local colleges and newspapers. First priority will be given to candidates that are locally based in and around the City and have a commitment to the local community. Once a new employee has been thoroughly screened and joined the LAZ-San Bruno team, we will provide them the tools and training for them to be successful. To be considered for a position, candidates must minimally complete an online job application. Candidates to be offered a position must meet company and City’s Personnel requirements. Successful candidates must also meet company’s requirements, which include passing a strict prescreening, at LAZ’s expense that includes: Pre-employment drug screen, background check, DMV record check, Social Security Number verification, eligibility to work in the United States. After successful completion of employment prescreen, each new hire undergoes a comprehensive training program including employee orientation, LAZ’s Ethos and Objectives, detailed and extensive procedures training, and project and employee expectations briefings. Our comprehensive ongoing training plan for the project is outlined further in this section.

2.5.3.2 Wages and Benefits
LAZ leads the standard in the parking industry as it relates to wages and benefits. We offer a competitive salary that is typically higher than a conventional parking company and a comprehensive benefits package. This includes medical and dental coverage (Blue Cross/Blue

136 of 157

Shield), paid time off, and 401K plan amongst many other benefits our full-time employees enjoy.

2.5.3.3 Record Keeping and Reporting
LAZ has hands-on experience customizing and
developing reports that best fit the needs of each of our clients. Each report provides easy-to-understand factors for the reviewer, with a focus on highlighting
performance metrics. Upon award of a contract, it is
our intent to meet with the City management and share
a variety of reports currently in use at our other
contracts. In partnership with our municipal clients, we have developed complex reporting mechanisms that
provide the operations with a consistent level of oversight.

We currently use LAZ’s proprietary Business Intelligence (BI) tool for performance reporting. In this section, we have shared some sample reports
currently in use at our other parking enforcement
contracts. To limit the number of pages to our response, we are sharing a few samples of these reports, but as
stated above, we look forward to meeting with City
management to discuss their preference as to which
reports are best suited for San Bruno parking enforcement program. LAZ will maintain project files and records per City’s record retention policy and throughout the term of this contract. All project records (electronic and paper) will include operations and maintenance guidelines. These include officer shift logs, citation activity reports, meeting agendas and minutes; management and staffing plans; staffing reports and schedules; updates to these documents; project staff training; plus, all manuals, systems maintenance records, training records, systems plans and installation records, and other correspondence. Activity Reports and Program Status Reporting. These reports range from a simple daily officer shift log to a more comprehensive weekly/monthly citation activity report, and from officer productivity report to violation trend report. Through citation mapping and violation heat maps are other ways we provide our clients a visual review of daily, weekly, and monthly citation activity and violation capture.

137 of 157

2.5.4 Task 4 – Training

2.5.4.1 Commitment to Training and Personnel
Development:

LAZ is well aware of the impact initial and ongoing
training have on the performance of our enforcement
officers. We believe well-trained officers will ensure a high rate of enforcement resulting in increased
compliance and reduce negative backlash from citizens
who may protest effective enforcement, thus reducing
the demands on both LAZ and City staff. We will
provide extensive in-house training with a formal
induction program for new employees, continuing on-
the-job training, and participation in training offered by LAZ University. Our training program will meet the
City’s training requirements. LAZ staff working at this project will go through a 24-hour classroom style
Initial Training and 40 hours of on-the-job training
including field training with supervisory staff. As
needed, we will also provide re-training and/or follow- up training required to correct deficiencies in
performance. LAZ will also provide staff with at least eight (8) hours of annual refresher courses and training. Topics will include, but are not limited to, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), changes in the law, new aspects of the City’s parking program, refresher or expanded training in customer relations, and conflict resolution. Continuing training, subject matter, and schedules will be reviewed and approved by the City representative prior to any training taking place.

Initial Training: All new hires will go through the Initial Training, which will include: New Hire Orientation (4 hours), Parking Enforcement Basics (4 hours), Customer Service/Conflict Resolution Training/Ambassador Program (8 hours), Physical layout of the City, SOP Training including Handheld/Ticket Writing, tasks and responsibilities under regular and emergency operating conditions, and parking enforcement programs and policies adopted by the City of San Bruno (8 hours), Field Training: 40 hours
Annual Refresher Training includes but is not limited to: Ambassador Program. Customer Service Training, Conflict Resolution, Harassment Awareness Training, Parking Enforcement Program, Legal Update. SOP training.

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
LAZ will conduct SOP training with an ambassador approach and cover the following topics:
• Enforcing parking meter, permit, posted sign violations and other parking regulations • Marking, tagging, towing and impoundment of vehicles
• San Bruno Municipal Code and California Vehicle Codes related to parking enforcement • City and Department Policies and procedures
• Emergency protocol and workplace safety
• Customer service delivery and expectations
• Courtroom procedures and testimony techniques

138 of 157

• Responding to calls for service

2.5.5 Task 5 - Uniforms
As ambassadors of the City, we recognize the importance of employee appearance. LAZ will provide complete uniform for our staff and all equipment needed to do their jobs well and safely. LAZ will provide staff with sufficient number of uniform shirts and pants to make sure they maintain a
professional appearance at all times. We have a national agreement with one of the largest uniform companies. Through their uniform rental program, we will issue 11 shirts and 5 pants to full-time employees. All staff will be issued jackets and hats for inclement weather. The uniform company will also be responsible for the cleaning of the uniform. They will drop off a clean set of uniforms weekly and pick up soiled uniforms.

Additionally, LAZ will provide staff with photo identification, name tags, and badges that
clearly state the company
name and the staff person’s
name. Subject to City
approval, LAZ will provide:
• Blue security style shirts,
OR
• Blue ambassador style blue polos
• Dark blue trousers
• Black shoes
• Silver color name plate
• High visibility traffic safety vests, highly visible rain gear, dark blue or black baseball cap
• Standard LAZ ID badges containing the employee’s picture and LAZ employee ID number

139 of 157

2.5.6 Task 6 – Optional Services
It is our understanding that City may require LAZ to
provide traffic control services for special events as
an optional service. We provide traffic control
services at other major contracts, most notably, in
San Mateo, Salinas, Inglewood and West
Hollywood. We provide traffic control services for
all special events, for citywide events, in case of
traffic collisions, non-working traffic signals, DUI
checkpoints, and for street closures for crime
investigations. We provide customized traffic
control training to all enforcement personnel. Each
PER is also supplied with whistles, white gloves, and
reflective traffic safety vests. All these items
including traffic cones are kept in each enforcement
vehicle so they can promptly respond to any calls for
service for traffic control. Billing rates for Special
Event enforcement and traffic control services will
be the same as PER hourly rate(s) provided in this
proposal. For special events requiring more than 5 traffic control officers, we will be prepared to bring officers from neighboring programs, San Mateo and San Francisco.

2.6 MOBILE PAYMENT TECHNOLOGY
Mobile parking payment apps are now in every major city, and the option to pay for parking with your phone is beginning to be the norm. There are a lot of competing apps out there, but which mobile payment technology vendor is the right fit for San Bruno? The good news is that the City of San Bruno has already recognized the need to move to a paid parking system and that option is currently being reviewed. It will be our recommendation to go with Pay-by-Phone, a vendor with the largest footprint in the area because of their longstanding contract with San Francisco and SFMTA. Introducing Pay-by-Phone in San Bruno will enhance the customer experience by offering multiple modes of payments. In addition, LAZ will work with the City to introduce our proprietary frictionless payment option using our LAZ text-to-park, an AppLess technology, that is expected to encourage contactless and frictionless payments. Features of LAZ Text to Park include those shown below.

140 of 157

2.7 VIRTUAL PERMIT PROGRAM
Per City’s request, we requested a proposal from
Turbo Data System for a fully integrated parking
permit program. The Turbo Data Systems, Inc.
(TDS) Parking Permit program is designed to allow residents to apply for and purchase parking permits, and to allow the City to track their parking permit program online using the Permit Manager. The system allows for annual permit renewals; either by letter generation and mailing, and/or electronic notification. The system is cloud-based based with a “self-service” ability for residents to purchase their permits. The applicant can register for an account and upload required documents which can then be verified by the City or TDS. Upon approval, the applicant will be notified to submit a permit request for the district/zone that they live in. The permit management system is scalable and designed to handle multiple permit types: Virtual Permits – Use Vehicle plate Multiple physical permits and multiple combinations (stick-on, hangtag) Guest Permits Multiple Residential Zones/Districts Annual residential permits Business parking permits Oversize Vehicle Permit pricing can be tier-structured, prorated or allow for special exceptions, discounts, pickup, delivery, etc. The system will allow both TDS and designated City staff to issue and administer permits as needed. Budgetary proposal provided by Turbo Data is being submitted as an exhibit to this proposal.

141 of 157

Section 3. FIRM’S BACKGROUND, EXPERIENCE AND HISTORY

3.1 NATIONAL STRENGTH
LAZ Parking is a national parking company,
headquartered in Hartford, CT, with regional
offices across the U.S. We operate through these
regional offices headed by officers of the
company. This organizational structure enables
LAZ to offer its clients the resources of a large
company but with the attention and
responsiveness more typical of a local company.

We are the second largest parking company in the
US, with the broadest experience and finest
employees in the industry.

Our portfolio includes major on-street and off-street municipal parking, mass transit parking systems, entertainment/event parking, commercial, residential buildings, hotels and resorts, office buildings, mixed-use projects, hospitals and medical complexes, airports, university parking, shuttle services and valet-oriented parking. Our range of experience makes us uniquely qualified to address the challenges of the parking operations in the City of San Bruno.

142 of 157

3.2 PUBLIC SECTOR EXPERTISE
The following is a sampling of LAZ Parking’s public sector clients, including the approximate number of spaces for each.

3.3 PARKING ENFORCEMENT EXPERIENCE
Within its Government Services Business Unit, LAZ has a dedicated Municipal On-Street Parking Business Segment that is primarily focused on Parking Enforcement and Curb Management Services. We have delivered reliable Parking Enforcement and related services since 1988. Within its Government Services portfolio, LAZ issues close to 1.5 million citations annually with an average citation dismissal rate of less than 3% at contracts across North America. Working collaboratively with cities, counties and police agencies throughout the U.S., LAZ has been intrinsic in developing innovative parking enforcement solutions that integrate seamlessly with the wider parking and transportation networks. We are in a unique position of having managed some of the most complex turnkey parking systems. Our experience and expertise in the techniques and technologies used in parking enforcement are unmatched. A snapshot of our current enforcement programs in provided in the table below.

143 of 157

SIZE AND COMPLEXITY

ANNUAL CITATIONS ISSUED

OPERATIONS/MANAGEMENT

PARKING ENFORCEMENT

ELECTRONIC HANDHELDS

SMART TECHNOLOGY

LPR TECHNOLOGY

ENFORCE ALL MCS & CVCS

PERMIT ENFORCEMENT

ON STREET ENFORCEMENT

OFF STREET ENFORCEMENT

SURFACE LOTS

STREET SWEEPING ENFORCE

CUSTOMER PHONE SUPPORT

TOWING AND BOOTING

TRAFFIC DISPATCH SERVICES

TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICES
California
City of West Hollywood 200,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ City of Inglewood 90,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ City of Palo Alto 10,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
City of Santa Ana 45,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
City of Salinas 20,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
City of San Mateo 50,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Illinois
City of Chicago 400,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Montgomery County 150,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

3.4 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE AND CALIFORNIA BASED REFERENCES With LAZ’s proven track record, City of San Bruno receives a partner with experience managing contracts that meet or exceed the size, scope, and complexity of the San Bruno Parking Enforcement program. Listed below are six (6) California based references in sequential order (from longest standing to most current).

REFERENCE #1 – WEST HOLLYWOOD PARKING ENFORCEMENT
Client’s Name City of West Hollywood, CA
Name of Contact & Title Vince Guarino, Parking Manager
Contact Information Tel 323-848-6426 – Email [email protected] Period of Performance 07/01/2015 – 06/30/2020 (continuously serving the City since 1992) Total Contract Value Base Contract - $14M
Scope of Services Turnkey Parking Enforcement Services 24 hours/day-365 days/year (all MCs & CVCs), Vehicle/Bike/Foot Patrol, Traffic Control, Dispatch Services, Front Counter Customer Service, Encroachment/Temp Permit Placement, To wing, Court Appearances.

Key Facts Project Manager, Deputy PM, Analyst, 5 Supervisor, 3 Dispatchers, 4 Bike Officers, 22 PERs. 10 License Plate Recognition (LPR) equipped vehicles, Virtual

144 of 157

Permitting Program, Fully Integrated Enforcement System. Enforce street sweeping, gridlock, residential and timed parking. Quality controls (GPS Tracking, Street Surveys, citizen feedback calls, in vehicle recording system).

REFERENCE #2 – INGLEWOOD PARKING SERVICES
Client’s Name City of Inglewood, CA / Inglewood Police Department (IPD) Name of Contact & Title Tanya Perry, Parking Program Superintendent Contact Information Tel 310.412.8745 – Email [email protected] Period of Performance 05/20/2014 – 05/31/2024
Total Contract Value Base Contract - $25M
Scope of Services Turnkey parking enforcement services 24 hours/day-365 days/year (all MCs & CVCs), traffic control services, traffic & crowd control during special events, traffic dispatch services, front counter customer service representatives.

Enforcement of parking meters, permits, timed parking, posted signs, curb violations, scofflaw, peak hour enforcement, and special details including school details.

Key Facts Project Manager, 4 Shift Supervisors, 4 Leads, 22 PERs, 25 Traffic Control Officers. Transitioned a complex parking program in less than 45 days (from in - house to LAZ). Improved citation issuance by 30 percent within the first three (3) months. Improved traffic congestion by effectively controlling traffic around Forum event center. Met all deadlines pertaining to start up deliverables – Procurement of new vehicles, uniforms, safety supplies, radios, equipment, and other related supplies. Currently looking to expand enforcement coverage with the anticipated opening of a new NFL stadium for the LA Rams and LA Chargers.

REFERENCE #3 – PALO ALTO RPPP PARKING ENFORCEMENT
Client’s Name City of Palo Alto, CA
Name of Contact & Title Mark Hur, Parking Operations Lead Contact Information Tel - 650.329.2520 Email [email protected] Period of Performance 05/01/2015 – 05/31/2020
Total Contract Value $2.3M
Scope of Services Enforcement of citywide Residential Preferential Parking Permit (RPPP) program.

Vehicle, bike and foot patrol.

Key Facts Transitioned a newly developed enforcement program in less than 45 days. Worked closely with Palo Alto PD and City Economic Development teams to ensure a smooth implementation. Spearheaded community outreach activities to raise awareness for residents, business owners and visitors. Continue to host citizen assistance calls and calls for service throughout City’s RPP districts. Added

145 of 157

additional staff to address expanded enforcement coverage to other RPP districts around Stanford University.

REFERENCE #4 – SALINAS CITYWIDE PARKING ENFORCEMENT
Client’s Firm City of Salinas, CA
Name of Contact & Title Mike Garner, Parking Manager
Contact Information Tel 831.758.7151 – Email [email protected] Period of Performance 10/1/2016 – 10/30/2020
Total Contract Value $1.25M
Scope of Services Citywide parking enforcement. Enforce all MCs and C.V.C. and provide citizen assistance support to Salinas PD and Public Works Dept.

Key Facts Citation issuance increased by 130% in Year 1 of implementation. Improved response time for service calls and consistent enforcement. Positively impacted parking availability throughout the City. Due to efficient management of the program, City has requested additional staff (essentially staffing levels have double since the inception of the program). Currently working with the City to introduce LPR and an enhanced vehicle towing and booting program.

REFERENCE #5 – SANTA ANA PARKING ENFORCEMENT
Client’s Name Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD)
Name of Contact & Title Yolanda Bautista, Supervisor – Field Operations/Traffic Division Contact Information Tel 714.245.8225 – Email [email protected] Period of Performance 07/01/2018 – 06/30/2023
Total Contract Value $3.5M
Scope of Services Citywide parking enforcement service including all MCs and C.V.Cs (Street sweeping, parking meters, RPP, 24/7 operation with commercial street sweeping covered during graveyard).

Key Facts Transitioned this complex contract in less than 30 days with no service interruptions. Screened, trained and onboarded incumbent staff and implemented all new processes during the transition and met all critical deadlines set forth by Santa Ana PD. Currently working with SAPD to introduce LPR and an ambassador program for downtown core. Continuously provide assistance for special assignments and have provided additional staff under the guidance of SAPD parking supervisor.

146 of 157

REFERENCE #6 – SAN MATEO PARKING ENFORCEMENT
Client’s Name Santa Mateo Police Department (SMPD)
Name of Contact & Title Glen Teixeira, Sergeant, Traffic Division

Contact Information Tel 650-522-7745 – Email [email protected] Period of Performance 12/01/2019 – 12/31/2025
Total Contract Value $7.5M
Scope of Services Citywide parking enforcement service including all MCs and C.V. Cs (Street sweeping, parking meters, RPP, on-street, off-street, City lots & garages).

Key Facts First time outsourced program. Dramatic improvement in parking compliance citywide and significant increase in citation issuance within 1st year of program implementation by LAZ. Currently working with the City to improve LPR use for both enforcement and occupancy data collection. Provide traffic control services year-round and assist SMPD with special assignments and have provided additional staff under the guidance of SMPD parking supervisor.

147 of 157

Section 4. TEAM EXPERIENCE AND STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS We have carefully selected our project team leaders and key personnel while considering our objectives to exceed the desired requirements for each position to deliver on City’s service level requirements, mitigate risk, and meet overall project objectives. Our proposed management team include subject matter experts currently providing responsive and efficient support to comparable parking enforcement programs within CA.

Phillip Ballin, Proposed Project Manager
Phil has been involved in the management and administration of complex parking enforcement programs since 2014. He currently manages our San Mateo parking enforcement contract and is being proposed as the shared Project Manager for San Bruno because of his extensive work within municipal parking enforcement operations. Phil brings over 14 years of parking industry experience, spending the past 8 years managing parking enforcement operations in the Bay Area. During this time, he has spearheaded various technology implementations while maintaining client satisfaction at some of the most notable high performing parking enforcement programs.

Robert Maroney, Vice President, Government Services
Rob Maroney joined LAZ Parking in 2015 as the Vice President of Government Services. Rob is responsible for overseeing and supporting our rapidly expanding Government Services market, which includes municipal agencies and public private partnerships. With over 20 years of experience, Rob brings extensive experience in government operations, management, and consulting. He started his career in municipal government, and during his 12+ year career with Norfolk, VA, he served as the Director of Parking. Rob was also the Director of Parking and Transportation for Virginia Commonwealth University, overseeing the university’s parking, transportation, and fleet management programs. He currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Parking Association of the Virginias and is an active member of several national and regional parking associations. Rob holds a Government and Fine Arts degree from the College of William & Mary and is a Certified Administrator of Public Parking (CAPP).

Muhammad Mansoor, VP, On-Street & Enforcement
A familiar name in the parking industry, Muhammad Mansoor serves as the subject matter expert for LAZ Parking’s Government Services. Muhammad ensures high-quality service delivery across our government parking contracts and has direct responsibility over the decisions for all on street parking contracts throughout the U.S. He is an active member of IPMI, NPA and various regional parking organizations. He is also a Six Sigma

148 of 157

Yellow Belt recipient. During his 20-year parking career, Muhammad has led the implementation of cutting-edge technology and helped cities develop the state of design tools and redefine transportation practices to transform urban spaces into urban places and stands by as a subject matter expert ready and willing to assist in this contract. He attended California State University, Long Beach and the Said Business School, University of Oxford.

Peter Cho, Operations & Transition Manager, Government Services Peter Cho joined LAZ Parking as part of the acquisition of Serco Parking Services in 2021 as the Senior Operations Manager. In this role, Peter provides operational support to all legacy Serco parking programs and ensures consistency and operational compliance throughout LAZ Parking’s Government Services programs. A proven leader with over twenty-five years in the Parking Industry. His experience includes working and transitioning complex municipal and commercial parking programs. As a subject matter expert in Municipal On and Off-Street Parking Operations, Peter is familiar with the latest technology and supports our new and existing operations. His solutions driven approach has helped improve and sustain some of our most complex operations including the City of West Hollywood, CA, City of Inglewood, CA, City of San Francisco/SFMTA, City of San Mateo, CA, City of Santa Ana, CA, City of Chicago, IL and Montgomery County, VA.

Cindy Hefner, General Manager-Bay Area
Cindy Hefner joined LAZ Parking in 2014 as Director of Operations, bringing over 17 years of experience in the parking industry to her operations. She is an accomplished operation executive with handson experience in successfully growing sales and revenues, improving customer service, and aggressively controlling expenses in competitive market environments. Cindy has a strong track record in identifying, developing, and executing productivity and system improvements. She offers a wide range of expertise in all areas of parking, including managed garages, automation operations, hotel, valet, and self-park. Cindy has built a reputation well respected by our clients for excellence in seamless transitions, operational efficiency, implementation of new technology and equipment to maximize revenue.

She graduated from Texas Wesleyan University and will be responsible for developing, supporting, and implementing the operations as well as client communication on a day-to-day basis. In addition, she will utilize her ability to implement effective team building skills. Cindy will work directly with the Project Manager to support the transition and ongoing parking operations for the City of San Bruno.

149 of 157

Section 5. PROPOSED PRICING STRUCTURE

5.1 COST FACTORS AND PRICING STRATEGY
The premium services we offer our customers come at a price that represents a maximum value to your business. This is especially true when you consider other service alternatives, low-cost providers that act more as a staffing agency, rather than a strategic partner. Our pricing solution offers best-in-class service with performance monitoring tools, subject matter expertise, long- term solutions, and scalability for future phases of the program. To serve you better, LAZ maintains industry-competitive pricing for all its parking enforcement services contracts. Our pricing considers several factors such as frequency of patrols and amount of detail required; and beat designs are crafted based on enforcement needs. Our pricing is based on a staffing plan that will best serve your enforcement needs in the beginning phase of this program and the service priorities required at your specific project. We can scale up as required as violation trends and heavy enforcement areas are identified, and violation capture rate and a baseline for citation issuance is determined during the first year of operation.

To allow you maximum flexibility of selecting a price that is the best fit for the City, we are proposing four pricing scenarios;
• Scenario 1 – Parking Enforcement Services – Time & Material (T&M) • Scenario 2 – Parking Meters – Citywide parking meter deployment • Scenario 3 – Mobile Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) • Scenario 4 – Parking Enforcement Office – within City limit

5.2 HOURLY LABOR RATES
Our proposed Time & Material (T&M) rates are fully burdened hourly labor rates. Man-hour billable rates are inclusive of direct labor, payroll taxes, workers comp and fringe. Staffing hours are based on 1920 productive hours for 4 Parking Enforcement Representatives (PERs) and 10% allocation of Project Manager hours. Regional Manager oversight will be provided to the City at no additional cost. Proposed rates for “Optional Services” will be the same as PER rate(s).

5.3 OTHER DIRECT CHARGES (ODCS)
All operating expenses in support of this program are including in the hourly man hour rate as well and include the following expenses:
• Electronic Handhelds/Ticket Writers plus Bluetooth printers • Citation paper stock and envelopes
• Vehicle Expenses – Lease, fuel, insurance, preventative maintenance • Telephone & Computer Usage – Voice and data plan
• Office and Safety Supplies
• Recruiting expenses – Drug Screens and Background Checks

5.4 STARTUP COSTS
A onetime startup cost is estimated based on our recent experience transitioning comparable programs. These costs include:
• Vehicle branding/wrapping/lightbars
• Startup training
• Implementation travel costs

150 of 157

5.5 COST SUMMARY

36 months 60 months
Parking Enforcement $26,246.81 $26,246.81
Parking Meters $8,720.01 $5,232.01
36 months 60 months
CAPEX $293,383.60 $293,383.60
Financing 7% 7%
Total Cost $313,920.45 $313,920.45
Estimated Monthly Payment $8,720.01 $5,232.01
Mobile ALPR $5,341.23 $3,204.74
36 months 60 months
CAPEX $179,705.00 $179,705.00
Financing 7% 7%
Total Cost $192,284.35 $192,284.35
Estimated Monthly Payment $5,341.23 $3,204.74
Office Lease $2,750.00 $2,750.00
Estimated Monthly Payments $43,058.06 $37,433.56
Estimated Annual Cost $516,696.69 $449,202.72
Term
Term
Term
Cost Summary
Estimated Monthly Payment

151 of 157

5.6 PARKING ENFORCEMENT SERVICES

Annual Cost Estimated
Annual Hours Billing Rate Number of
FTEs Status
Annual
Productive
Hours
Parking Enforcement
Parking Enforcement Officers 328,733.44$ 8,512 38.62$ 4 Full Time 8,512 Project Manager 18,360.16$ 208 88.27$ 1 Shared 208 Regional Manager -$ 2,080 -$ 1 Shared 2080 Total Annual Cost 347,093.60$ 10,800 10800
Enforcement Coverage
Route 1
Route 2
Street Sweeping Enforcement
Operating Expenses
General and Administrative
Wages and salaries
Vehicle Lease
Fuel
Insurance (Auto_Liability_WC)
Uniforms & Cleaning Service
TurboData TicketPro Handhelds
TurboData Paper Stock
HR (hiring_onboarding_training) Included in T&M Rates
Included in T&M Rates
Included in T&M Rates
Included in T&M Rates
Included in T&M Rates
Included in T&M Rates
Included in T&M Rates
El Camino Real; Lot 1; Lot 2 (2 hour); Angus Ave; Sylvan Ave; Easton Ave; Lot 8; Kains Ave; Library Lot; Jenevein Ave; San Mateo Ave; Hensley Ave; San Bruno Ave; Green Ave; Easton Ave; Lot 2 (5 hour); Lot 3; Lot 4; Lot 5; Lot 7; Lot 6 El Camino Real; Lot 1; Lot 2 (2 hour and 5 hour); Lot 3; Lot 4; Lot 5; Lot 7; Angus Ave; Sylvan Ave; Lot 6; San Bruno Ave; Easton Ave; Lot 8; Kains Ave; Library Lot; Jenevein Ave; San Mateo Ave; Hensley Ave; Green Ave; Easton Ave Included in T&M Rates
Included in T&M Rates
San Bruno
Parking Enforcement Services
1st & 3rd Mon: 0900-1100 hours, 1100-1300 hours
1st & 3rd Tue: 0600-0700 hours, 0900-1100 hours, 1100-1300 hours 1st & 3rd Wed: 0500-1330 hours
1st & 3rd Thur: 0500-1330 hours
1st & 3rd Fri: 0900-1100 hours (Shelter Creek Ln, just one street)

152 of 157

5.7 LICENSE PLATE RECOGNITION (LPR) TECHNOLOGY

Authorized Dealer Route 1 Authorized Dealer TurboData
Hardware, Shipping, Installation
Startup, Commissioning, Travel, Training
Cellular Testing
System Software Support, 4G MiFi (annual)
Warranty
Total Annual Cost
Total 5 year Cost
Extended Warranty Year 1 - 5 $53,991.80
$13,500.00
$125,705.00
$179,705.00
Included in above price
$133,156.00
$164,660.00
Genetec Vigilant
Mobile ALPR
Cost Comparison
$125,280.00
$7,876.00
$102,680.00
$7,525.00
$2,000.00

153 of 157

5.8 PARKING METERS
Per City’s request, we evaluated multiple parking meter technology options and found MacKay Meters to be the ideal solution for San Bruno.

J.J. MacKay Canada Limited (MacKay Meters) is a recognized world leader in the parking control business. MacKay manufactures both single space and multi space equipment along with supporting accessories and software. Mackay was recently awarded a 5-year agreement by the City of San Francisco and San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) to upgrade the entire San Francisco meter system. Beginning early next year, SFMTA will be replacing more than 18,000 parking meters throughout San Francisco. The parking meter hardware upgrade is taking place under a $70 million contract. This recent contract award provides a unique opportunity for Mackay Meters to offer meter technology and infrastructure improvements to other bay area cities at a highly competitive price as they can utilize their management and technical resources from San Francisco.

Mackay offers industry leading meter technology for an
enhanced user experience by providing a wider and brighter screen, accepting contactless payment, and allowing customers to receive a parking receipt via text message.

Cost proposal for converting San Bruno’s non-metered spaces to metered spaces require accurate curb mapping. The cost proposal being submitted here is based on an initial study and may require adjustments after further discussion with City staff including public works and traffic engineering. When ‘walking’ San Mateo Avenue, we counted 138 spaces (we may have missed a few, or double counted a few but have used 138 for this pricing exercise). There are some significant savings to be had by deploying a system that utilizes primarily a Dual Space mkBeacon with some Single Space mkBeacon meters. The thought would be that a Single Space mkBeacon would be used at the end of an area which has an odd number of spaces.

Based on our site visit and our initial assessment, we found the following to be the best option:
• Single and Dual mkBeacons – pricing for 18 single space meters, 60 dual space meters, vault housings and meter poles (with mounting hardware) + 1 year of monthly fees. With the way the street is set up, there are many spots that are conducive to utilizing a Dual space mkBeacon.
• Tangos – pricing for 25 Tango pay stations + 1 year of monthly fees. Using 25 pay stations seemed like a good place to start. Whether you end up with 23 or 27 after a final analysis is done, using 25 is safe.

Things that are not considered in this pricing exercise:
• Extended warranty, Installation, Commissioning and Shipping • Collection equipment and Paper costs (for Tango pay stations) • Any decorative pole equipment (for mkBeacons meters)

154 of 157

Cost Proposal
Mackay Parking Meters
Annual
1 Yr. Warranty Consumables
QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE Total Total
18 MacKay mkBeacon Single Space coin / card /NFC meter 625.00$ 11,250.00$ 18 Single Space GHN Services in advance 1st year @ $8/meter/ Month all in 96.00$ 1,728.00$ 1,728.00$ Includes all Communications, Transactions and Hosted services. -$ New Parking meter Vault /Coin Can Locks and Keys -$
-$
-$
60 MacKay mkBeacon Two Space coin / card/ NFC meter 800.00$ 48,000.00$ 60 Two Space GHN Services in advance 1st year @ $14.00/meter/ Month all in 168.00$ 10,080.00$ 10,080.00$ Includes all Communications, Transactions and Hosted services. -$ New Parking meter Vault /Coin Can Locks and Keys -$
78 Complete Surface Mounting Pole Kit 150.00$ 11,700.00$ 312 Mechanical Anchor Mounts 8.55$ 2,667.60$ 102,575.60$ 11,808.00$
mkBeacon total 114,383.60$
Installation, commissioning and shipping TBD Tango Total 179,000.00$ Savings with utilizing dual space meters 64,616.40-$
Multi Space
25 MacKay Tango- Pay By Space or Pay by Plate Configuration... 6,500.00$ 162,500.00$ MacKay Tango – accepts coins, credit card, smart cards , NFC .

Solar powered including modem for communications and 1 year warranty 25 Annual fee for GHN contract and communications @ $55.00/ Machine /Month 660.00$ 16,500.00$ -$
Total 179,000.00$
Installation, commissioning and shipping TBD

155 of 157

5.9 RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI) ANALYSIS

Number of Tickets
Issued (2019
baseline)
Expected Increase
in Citation Issuance
Total Citations
Year 1
Net Gain
(Citations)
Average
Ticket Value
Anticipated Citation
Revenue
Increase
80%
Collection
Rate ROI
17,370 40% 24,318.00 6,948.00 $50 $347,400 $277,920 1.5 Years

156 of 157

Price Proposal
Item Description Quantity Unit Price Extended Price
Coin escrow/Coin Canister/Credit Card/Solar Power/LTE Cellular/2 years extended warranty 88 $6,457.50 $568,260.00 Recommended Spare Parts 1 $8,520.00 $8,520.00

SET-UP COSTS
T2 Iris Profile set-up fee 1 $500.00 $500.00
BOSS Suite set-up fee 1 $132.50 $132.50
Data Connect LTE activation fee 84 $15.00 $1,260.00
LTE Verizon SIM Cards 84 $15.00 $1,260.00
Green keys 2 $16.50 $33.00
Yellow keys 1 $16.50 $16.50
Coin Canister keys 2 $5.00 $10.00
3 day On-site training 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00
Shipping estimate 1 $11,000.00 $11,000.00
Installation by LAZ 84 $245.00 $20,580.00
*applicable taxes not included on all the above pricing Spare Coin Canisters for collections 88 $300.00 $26,400.00 Paper receipt roll 88 $41.00 $3,608.00
*applicable taxes not included on all the above pricing Item Description Interval Unit Unit Price Quantity Extended Price Digital Iris - management software Monthly Each $45.00 84 $3,780.00 Data Connect Monthly Each $20.00 84 $1,680.00
*Digital Iris includes real-time credit card processing, real-time alerts and real-time reporting *Data Connect includes 2,000 transaction per month and $0.02 per transaction overage PRICING PROPOSAL - City of San Bruno

ON-GOING COMMUNICATION AND MANAGEMENT FEES
List all applicable recurring monthly fees associated with the system, including communication fees, management fees, connection and transaction fees, etc.

DATE - September 16, 2022Vendor Name - T2 Systems
Luke Cosmo

MULTI-SPACE PAY STATION PRICING

157 of 157

San Bruno City CouncilNovember 8, 2022

San Bruno City Council
November 8, 2022