ENHANCED CITYWIDE PARKING
ENFORCEMENT AND DOWNTOWN
METERING PROGRAM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 11, 2023Ryan Johansen, Chief of Police
2 Objective
Consider Adoption of Three Resolutions as Follows:
• Authorizing the Creation of a Parking Enterprise Fund and the Transfer of $2 million from the General Fund Capital Reserve into the Parking Enterprise Fund
• Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with LAZ Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $2.75 million for Services Related to Parking Enforcement and Metered Parking
Management
• Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with T2 Systems in an Amount Not to Exceed $1.3 million for Services Related to the Purchase and Installation of Metered Parking Kiosks
3 Agenda
I. Background
II. Discussion of Creating a Parking Enterprise Fund
III. Discussion of Contracted Services with LAZ
IV. Discussion of Parking Kiosks with T2
V. Fiscal Impact
VI. Recommendation/Alternatives
VII. Questions
4 Background
San Bruno Downtown Parking Study Final Parking Management Plan January 2019
Available at:
www.sanbruno.ca.gov/DowntownParkingManagementPlan
Key Takeaways
• Business owners and residents find current conditions unacceptable • Parking issues intensifying
• Parking demand exceeds supply
Relevant Recommendations
• Enforcement in the heavy-use evening period
• Installation of parking meters for short-term zones
• Route longer-term parkers into lots
• Improved signage to help drivers locate available parking • Formalize overnight parking arrangements in public lots for residents 5 Background
Enhancement of Citywide parking enforcement capabilities and establishing a metered parking program in the downtown area City Council Strategic Initiative Established
FY 2020-21
6 Background
• Responsible for parking enforcement
• Essential to the effectiveness of metering
• Charged with managing permit programs per municipal code • Established 2 phases
• Phase 1: Citywide enhanced parking enforcement
• Phase 2: Installation of meters and wayfinding signage Project Undertaken by the Police Department
Late 2021
7 Background
Staff Report and Presentation to City Council
March - 2022
• Update on staff’s overall progress on project
• Highlighted challenges and limitations to enforcement efforts • Limited staffing
• Legal restrictions
• Technology limitations
• Notice of Staff’s intention to recommend contracted partnership for enforcement
8 Background
Staff Report and Presentation to City Council
November - 2022
• Staff recommended action on Phase 1 and provided update on Phase 2 • Recommended creation of a Parking Enterprise Fund
• Recommended entering contract with LAZ Services for parking enforcement pending completion of Meet and Confer
• Determining recommendations re: metered parking was underway • City Council indicated support but requested this come back after completion of the Meet and Confer process
9 Background
Since the November Staff Report
• Meet and Confer process successfully completed
• Bargaining unit supports the contract with LAZ Services • Staff is now prepared to combine Phase 1 and Phase 2
• Expedites metered parking
• Improves the fiscal outlook
10 Discussion
Creating a Parking Enterprise Fund
• Enables the City to fund the initial costs of implementation • Establishes a location for the deposit of ongoing revenues associated with citations and meter fees
• Supports the ongoing costs of the program
• Makes for easier accounting of net fiscal impacts
• Establishes a potential source of funding for other initiatives as directed by City Council
• Less the parking enforcement revenues already included in the PD budget • Initially funded with $2 million from the General Fund Capital Reserve • Covers cost of meter kiosk purchases (84)
• Five years of metered parking services
• First year of enforcement contract with LAZ Services
11 Discussion
Contracting with LAZ Services
Existing Enforcement Challenges
Limited Staffing
• 2 FT and 3 PT CSOs to handle all parking enforcement citywide • Generally, no CSO coverage after 2:30pm each day
• CSOs are critical to other police department operations • Cold crime reports, non-injury traffic collisions, property and evidence transport, fleet maintenance, traffic control, etc.
12 Discussion
Why not just hire more CSOs?
• Consistently staffing the CSO position is challenging • Waning interest
• Typically, aspiring officers/dispatchers that move on • Mandatory background requirements
• Compensation levels
Contracting with LAZ Services
Existing Enforcement Challenges
13 Discussion
Technology Needs
• Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR)
• Essentially required for timed enforcement (chalking) • Required for metering enforcement
• Metering without enforcement doesn’t work
• Far more efficient for other parking enforcement
• Permits
• Restricted zones
• Allows “drive-by” enforcement
• Integrates with existing enforcement platforms
• No current ALPR enforcement capability
Contracting with LAZ Services
Existing Enforcement Challenges
14 Discussion
What does current enforcement look like?
• Street sweeping
• Selected areas based on needs conveyed by PW
• Abandoned vehicle abatement
• High volume, low enforcement, chalking challenge
• Registration violations
• Blocked driveways
• Vehicle hazards
• Sign violations
• Very little timed parking enforcement
• Minimal widespread proactive enforcement
• Blocked sidewalks, wrong way, etc.
15 Discussion
Potential Partnership with LAZ Parking
LAZ Parking has provided a proposal to deliver the following:
• Four full-time Parking Enforcement Officers (PEOs)
• Coverage Monday-Saturday, 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM
• 2 - 4 PEOs working each day
• Ensures later enforcement hours
• Recommended in the 2019 report
• Equipped with TurboData TicketPro electronic citation writers
16 Discussion
Potential Partnership with LAZ Parking
LAZ Parking has provided a proposal to deliver the following:
• Citywide parking enforcement coverage including:
• Responding to reported violations
• Timed parking enforcement
• Street sweeping enforcement
• Other saturated parking enforcement as directed
• Parking complaints can be reported directly to LAZ
• Dedicated phone number
• San Bruno Responds application (Accela)
• Calls to PD will route to LAZ
17 Discussion
Potential Partnership with LAZ Parking
LAZ Parking has provided a proposal to deliver the following:
• One Project Manager and one Regional Manager
• Four ALPR-equipped parking enforcement vehicles
• LAZ is responsible for all vehicle maintenance and insurance • ALPR system continually reads parked vehicles’ license plates and/or vehicle descriptions as a PEO drives the vehicle on patrol • ALPR system will alert the PEO if it detects a possible vehicle that is parked beyond the allowed time limit or a vehicle that has not paid in a metered location
• LAZ will lease an office within the City from which to run their operations 18 Discussion
Potential Partnership with LAZ Parking
• Immediately enhances citywide parking enforcement
• Regular, consistent patrols for a wide array of violations • Immediate ability to resume timed parking enforcement • Critical to downtown businesses
• Enforcement of metered parking when installed
• Metered parking cannot be implemented without a consistent ALPR-based enforcement solution
• Capability to manage and enforce permit parking programs • Not a current capability of the PD
19 Discussion
Potential Partnership with LAZ Parking
• Some parking related activities must still be handled by CSOs • Those requiring CLETS clearance
• Registration violations, 72-hour parking, etc.
• CSOs are essential to maintaining current service levels • Cold crime reports, non-injury collision investigations, traffic control, property and evidence handling, special events, etc. • This proposal maintains existing CSO staffing levels
20 Discussion
Why LAZ Parking?
• National company with offices across the US
• Member of National Cooperative Purchasing Alliance
• Competitive analysis completed by GSA
• Already active in the area with excellent referrals
• San Mateo, Palo Alto, and around the state
• Integration with existing PD systems
• Connection with T2 (meter vendor)
• Flexibility in scope and nature of enforcement
• Full use of ALPR
21 Discussion
Why LAZ Parking?
• Fair and consistent parking enforcement
• “Creating a culture of compliance”
• Value-added services to the community
• Providing brochures, directions, or a map to someone looking for a particular place of interest (e.g., Restaurant, Administration, Library, etc.) • Aiding customers with changing flat tires or jump starting a dead battery • Calling for Police assistance or reporting suspicious activity • Providing a friendly explanation of why a vehicle received a ticket • Explaining the appeals process to a citizen or visitor that received a ticket • Visiting merchants to discuss any problems or concerns in a proactive and professional manner
• Actively participating in merchant association and civic meetings 22 Discussion
Expanded Enforcement
• Increased enforcement will create some frustrations
• Violations not previously enforced consistently will be • Areas that have not had consistent enforcement will
• Street sweeping citywide
• Police Department will engage a robust outreach effort prior to expansion
• Website
• Social media
• CM newsletter
• Utility bill inserts
23 Discussion
Metered Parking Downtown
24 Discussion
Metered Parking Downtown
• Approximately 839 spaces
• Current timed parking spaces and City lots
• Park/pay by plate as opposed to space
• Eliminates need for painting stalls/numbers
• Enables ALPR based enforcement
• Reduces overlap parking
• Allows variable fees and/or permits (businesses, employees, etc.) • Kiosks as opposed to individual meters
• Solar powered, cellular connected (no hard infrastructure) • Allow cash, card, and app payments
25 Discussion
Metered Parking Downtown
T2 Solutions
• Best in class kiosks
• 84 T2 Cosmo II Pay Station Kiosks
• Expected lifespan 10-15 years
• Full 5 year warranty
• Installation
• 5 years of service and repair
• Extra parts included
• Existing partner vendor with LAZ Services
• National company with offices across the US
• Member of National Cooperative Purchasing
Alliance
• Competitive analysis completed by GSA
• Already active in the area with excellent referrals
• Integration with existing PD systems
26 Discussion
Additional Items for Future Council Consideration
• Targeted for within 90 days of passage of these Resolutions • Creating and adopting a City Ordinance authorizing metered parking, it’s enforcement and fines
• Establishing parking rates by zone and/or time
• Temporary parking zone options
• Considering parking options for business owners, employees, and/or residents
• Considering overnight parking options in City lots
27 Fiscal Impact
• 5-year contract with LAZ
• Estimated total get of $2,570,472 over 5 years
• Average monthly cost $42,842/month
• Costs are paid to LAZ monthly
• Chart below indicates the anticipated monthly and annual costs over the five years of the contract
LAZ Contract Costs
Yea r Annual Costs Monthly Costs
1 $486,254 $40,522
2 $499,763 $41,647
3 $513,677 $42,807
4 $528,009 $44,001
5 $542,771 $45,231
28 Fiscal Impact
• Average monthly revenue from parking citations in San Bruno over the past five (5) years has been approximately $54,995/month
• Already accounted for and encumbered in the Police Department budget • Cannot be directly used to offset the expense of this contract • Substantial increase in citation revenue expected with LAZ contract • Based upon deployment of similar programs in other jurisdictions Citation Revenues
29 Fiscal Impact
• LAZ Parking analysis
• 7 contract locations in California
• First year increased citation revenues of 45% to 130% • Largely based on existing levels of enforcement
• Very minimal in San Bruno
• San Bruno increase likely at top end of estimate
• 40% - 50% increase in subsequent years
• Drops with increased compliance over year one
Citation Revenues
30 Fiscal Impact
• When both phases are complete, staff expects substantial net positive • Initial capital improvement expense for meters
• Estimated to be $1.3 million
• Parking meters will generate substantial revenue for the City • Surveys of other cities
• $225/month - $309/month per metered space
• Estimated 839 spaces within the proposed metering area • $188,775 - $259,251 of revenue per month
• Between $2.67 - $3.11 million annually
* These projections are based on survey averages only and it is unknown how they might compare to the actual revenues in San Bruno. In an effort to be conservative in estimations, the charts that follow use the bottom of the revenue estimate range * The Program as a Whole
31 Fiscal Impact
• The chart below estimates the overall annual fiscal impact of this program, using the median of the estimated meter revenue range ($2,688,156) • The estimated meter revenue and meter cost in Year One are zero as the meters are not likely to be installed until sometime later in that year The Program as a Whole
Year Enforcement
Vendor Cost
Metering Cost Total Cost Increased
Citation
Revenue
Meter Revenue Total New
Revenue
Net Fiscal
Impact
1 $486,254 $0 $486,254 $593,952 $0 $593,952 $107,698
2 $499,763 $65,520 $565,283 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2.45 million 3 $513,677 $65,520 $579,197 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2.43 million 4 $528,009 $65,520 $593,529 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2.42 million 5 $542,771 $65,520 $608,291 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2.40 million TOTAL $2.57 mil $2.62 mil $2.83 million $1.91 million $10.75 million $13.72 million $9.83 million 32 Fiscal Impact
The Program as a Whole
• These estimates indicate a net positive for the City
• Approximately $9.8 million over the 5-year term
• Less the estimated cost of purchasing and installing meters ($1.3 million) • Estimated net gain of approximately $8.5 million over that 5-year period Year Enforcement
Vendor Cost
Metering Cost Total Cost Increased
Citation
Revenue
Meter Revenue Total New
Revenue
Net Fiscal
Impact
1 $486,254 $0 $486,254 $593,952 $0 $593,952 $107,698
2 $499,763 $65,520 $565,283 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2.45 million 3 $513,677 $65,520 $579,197 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2.43 million 4 $528,009 $65,520 $593,529 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2.42 million 5 $542,771 $65,520 $608,291 $329,964 $2,688,156 $3,018,120 $2.40 million TOTAL $2.57 mil $2.62 mil $2.83 million $1.91 million $10.75 million $13.72 million $9.83 million 33 Fiscal Impact
What if meter revenues in San Bruno are less?
50% less
• Net fiscal gains in years 2 through 5
• Approximately $1.1 million/year
• $4.4 million total
• Less $1.3 million kiosk cost is
$3.1 million
75% less
• Net fiscal gains in years 2 through 5
• Approximately $400k/year
• $1.6 million total
• Less $1.3 million kiosk cost is
$300,000
If San Bruno meters generate only 25% of the low end of average meter revenue, the program is still expected to be a net positive fiscal gain, while achieving a long-
standing City Council Strategic Initiative
34 Recommendation
Adopt Three Resolutions as Follows:
• Authorizing the Creation of a Parking Enterprise Fund and the Transfer of $2,000,000 from The General Fund Capital Reserve into the Parking Enterprise Fund
• Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with LAZ Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $2,750,000.00 for Services Related to Parking Enforcement and Metered Parking
Management
• Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with T2 Systems in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,300,000.00 for Services Related to the Purchase and Installation of Metered Parking Kiosks
35 Alternatives
1. Take no action, continue limited parking enforcement with available Police Department Community Service Officers and do not proceed with metered parking
2. Adopt one or more of the recommended Resolutions, while delaying or terminating other Resolution(s)
3. Request additional information from Staff prior to taking action. 36 Questions
CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING, AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING EXECUTION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
RELATED TO THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY AND
APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF EXEMPT FACILITY BONDS FOR A QUALIFIED HOUSING PROJECT AT 732 – 740 EL CAMINO REAL BY THE AUTHORITY FOR
THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING OR REFINANCING THE ACQUISITION,
CONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENT OF CERTAIN FACILITIES FOR THE
BENEFIT OF SAN BRUNO PACIFIC ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 11, 2023Peter Gilli, Community and Economic Development Director Agenda Item 7a
2 Agenda
I. Objective
II. Background on the 732 – 740 El Camino Real Project
III. California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA)
IV. Public Hearing for Issuance of Bonds
V. Tonight’s Recommended Action
VI. Questions
3 Objective
• Consider joining the California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) • Conduct a public hearing and consider approval of the issuance of $60,000,000 exempt facility bonds by the Authority for a qualified residential project at 730 – 740 El Camino Real
4 732
–
740 El Camino Real Project
5 732 – 740 El Camino Real – Site
• 0.6 acres
• TOD-2 High Density
Mixed Use Zone
SITE
6 732 – 740 El Camino Real – Project
• Six-story, 134-unit
residential building
• 40 below-market-rate units
• 25 parking spaces
• Vehicular access from El
Camino Real
7 732 – 740 El Camino Real – Review Process
• SB 35 – parking, ministerial approval
• Density Bonus – additional units, massing, height, reduced open space
• Schedule
• September 2021 – Initial submittal
• October 2021 – Council special meeting
• June 2022 – Initial approval
• December 2022 – Amended approval
8 732 – 740 El Camino Real – Financing
• Private Financing
• San Bruno Pacific Associates, California LP “Developer” has applied for $60,000,000 in bonds from the California
Municipal Financing Authority (CMFA)
9 California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA)
10 California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA)
• Joint Powers Authority for financing within California (2004)
• Exempt Facility Bond – tax-exempt bond
• CMFA issues the bond
• No financial costs, liabilities or obligations taken on by the City in becoming a member
• Over 350 CA agencies are members
• City can withdraw at any time upon written notice
11 Public Hearing for Private Activity Bond
12 • 26 CFR § 1.147(f)-1 – Public Approval of Bond Issuance • The City is a governmental unit with authority over the geographic area in which the project seeking the bond is located • The City must provide a “host approval” at a public hearing for the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for this project
Public Hearing for Tax Exempt Bonds
13 T onight’s Recommended Action
14 T onight’s Recommended Action
• Adopt a resolution approving, authorizing and directing execution of a joint exercise of powers agreement with the California Municipal Finance Authority; • Pursuant to Federal law, conduct a public hearing for the proposed $60,000,000 exempt facility bond for the 732-740 El Camino Real housing project; and • Adopt a resolution granting host approval for the California Municipal Financing Authority to issue exempt facility bonds to San Bruno Pacific Associates, California LP for the 732-740 El Camino Real housing project QUESTIONS?
15 PROP 218 NOTICING FOR SOLID
WASTE COLLECTION RATE
ADJUSTMENTS
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 11, 2023
Bobby Magee, Interim Finance Director
Matthew Lee, Public Works Director
Agenda Item 8.a.
2 Objective
Consider Adoption of a Resolution
Directing Staff to Initiate the Property
Owner Notice and Protest Process as
Required by Proposition 218 for the FY
2023-24 Solid Waste Rate Increase
Proposed by Recology San Bruno
3 Agenda
I. Background
II. Proposed Rate Adjustments
III. Proposition 218 Process
IV. Public Hearing Notice for Rate Increase
V. Proposed Timeline for Rates
VI. Tonight’s Recommended Action
VII. Questions
4 Franchise Agreement
Previous Franchise Agreement between the City of San
Bruno and Recology since July 1, 1998, was set to expire on June 30, 2024
• 29% rate increase for July 2022 based on the former agreement Council approved New Franchise Agreement on
September 27, 2022, which sets the amount for the annual scheduled rate increases on January 1, 2023, July 1, 2023, and July 1, 2024
New Franchise Agreement was effective January 1, 2023 • SB 1383 (Organics Waste Recycling) Compliance Requirements • Solid waste collection services
• Billing and Administration
5 January 1, 2023 Rate Increase
6 Proposed Rate Adjustment FY2023-24
Garbage service rate request increase, e.g.
• Residential 32 Gallon – $3.30 /mo. (9.58%)
• Commercial 64 Gallon – $9.25 /mo. (9.58%)
New rates to take effect on July 1, 2023, if
approved by City Council
Rate adjustment components:
• 1.23% for customer billing by Recology
• 6.35% for franchise fee for street sweeping and
catch basin removal
• 2% for annual scheduled rate increase per the
Agreement
7 Street Sweeping & Catch Basin Waste Removal
Met with Teamsters 856 to
discuss services
New franchise fee for
• Street sweeping
• Catch basin waste removal
Franchise fee will fund City
expenditures for
apportioned trash removal
through street sweeping
and catch basin waste
removal efforts
8 Street Sweeping & Catch Basin Waste Removal
Storm Water Fund currently running at a deficit
Offset operating expenditures of street sweeping
& catch basin waste removal
• Does not address other operating expenses and
unfunded stormwater capital needs
Cost allocation study prepared to calculate the
proportion that may be attributed to the collection
of solid waste generated within the City totaling
$798,993:
• $431,212 proportional allocation for annual street sweeping costs
• $367,781 proportional allocation for catch basin waste removal
9 Historical Rate Comparisons - Residential
Rate increase from previous FY 22-23
Recology submitted a 29% increase
per Previous Franchise Agreement
10 New Programs & Rates Implemented
Sector 1/1/23 7/1/23
Residential 6.03% 9.58%
Commercial & Debris Box 16.81% 9.58%
Components of Increase 1/1/23 7/1/23
Scheduled Rate Increase 6.00% 6.00% 2.00%
SB1383 Compliance 10.81%
Bulky Goods and Abandoned Waste
Customer Billing 1.23%
Compost Giveaway 0.03%
Street Sweeping 6.35%
6.03% 16.81% 9.58%
11 Residential Solid Waste Rate Comparison
City 32g Rate Serviced By
Foster City $27.52 Recology
Burlingame $29.83 Recology
Daly City $31.31 Allied
San Mateo $32.93 Recology
Hillsborough $35.72 Recology
Half Moon Bay $36.99 Allied
San Bruno (Proposed) $37.79 Recology
Redwood City $38.86 Recology
South San Francisco $39.79 SSF Scavenger
Millbrae $41.43 SSF Scavenger
Belmont $43.21 Recology
Pacifica $45.04 Recology
San Carlos $46.04 Recology
Menlo Park $47.64 Recology
Average $38.55
12 Proposed Residential & Commercial Garbage
T oterMonthly Rate Change Summary
Ty p e Current
Rate
Proposed
Rate Increase
Residential
16-gallon cart $21.81 $23.90 $2.09
20-gallon cart $26.74 $29.30 $2.56
32-gallon cart $34.49 $37.79 $3.30
64-gallon cart $68.98 $75.59 $6.61
96-gallon cart $103.47 $113.38 $9.91
Commercial
64-gallon cart $96.54 $105.79 $9.25
1-yard container $202.67 $222.09 $19.42
13 Proposition 218
Voter initiative in 1996 amending California Constitution to place strict limits on cities’ power to impose fees for “property related services”
Applies to fees for solid waste collection services
Proposition 218 process applies when imposing or increasing fees for solid waste collection services:
Written notice by mail
Public hearing at least 45 days after mailed notice
At the public hearing, consider all protests against the proposed fee If written protests against the proposed fee are presented by a majority of owners of property subject to the fee, the City cannot impose the fee
14 Public Notice
Franchise Agreement
requires rate increase
on July 1, 2023, for
garbage, recycling and
organics collection
services
City to mail notice for
public hearing on rates
15 Rate Adjustment Adoption Timeline
Date Item
April 11, 2023 City Council directs staff to provide 45-day notice about proposed rates.
April 17, 2023 Notices mailed to start 45-day period.
June 13, 2023
City Council holds public hearing, considers
protests, and takes action to adopt resolution
setting new rates.
July 1, 2023 New rates take effect.
16 T onight’s Recommended Action
Adoption of a Resolution Directing Staff
to Initiate the Property Owner Notice
and Protest Process as Required by
Proposition 218 for the FY 2023-24 Solid
Waste Rate Increase Proposed by
Recology San Bruno
17 Questions
FIBER UPGRADE PHASE 2.1
2 Recap
City Council Meeting, 11/22/2022:
City Council received and accepted three year CityNet fiber upgrade plan Planned spend of $3 million in Year 1 and $1 million each in years 2 and 3 Subject to approval of a detailed plan
CityNet directed to present detailed fiber upgrade plan Upon approval, funds appropriation from Development Impact Fees
3 Reasons for Upgrade
Current Hybrid Fiber Coaxial Infrastructure - 1998
Performance deterioration over time
Fiber technology widely prevalent
Software server powering CityNet’s Active taps in danger of failure – no replacement!
Internet infrastructures with minimal power requirements – Fiber wins!
4 Fiber Upgrade Phase 1.0 and 2.0
Fiber Upgrade 1.0 complete
Three Multiple Dwelling Complexes
Four Single Family neighborhoods
Upgrades successful
Upgrade methodology used:
Hybrid CityNet Staff (70%) Contractors (30%)
CityNet equipment procurement
Fiber Upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 are the focus of this presentation
5 Fiber Upgrade Plan 2.0 Phases
Existing HFC Fiber
6 Initial Upgrade Criteria
Frequency of power and CityNet service outages
Hilly terrain
Tree cover
Need for backyard access
Proximity to CityNet Data Centers
San Bruno CityNet’s Fiber Upgrade 2.0
Coverage of Single Family Homes By Area
Phase AREA HOMES POLES
Phase 2.1 West of Skyline 1,018 287
Phase 2.2 Northeast of Skyline 1,098 280
Phase 2.3 Southeast of Skyline 1,499 416
Phase 2.4 Business Park 1,490 386
Phase 2.5 City Park Area 1,745 529
Phase 2.6 East of El Camino 1,611 489
Phase 2.7 East of Railroad Tracks 1,385 305
TOTAL 9,846 2,692 7
San Bruno CityNet’s Fiber 2.0 Upgrade
Household Breakdown - San Bruno
CATEGORY HOMES COMMENTS
Single Family Homes in
Upgrade 2.0 Plan 9,846
Incudes upgraded 264 Single Family
Homes
Covers City’s 2,692 poles
Multiple Dwelling Units
already upgraded 2,575 Completed 2018-19
MDUs not covered by
Upgrade Plan 2,280 Crossings, Cherry Village, etc.
TOTAL 14,701 Per 2020 U.S. Census
8 9
Focus of Fiber 2.1 Upgrade - 2023-24
Areas West of Skyline and Northeast of Skyline
Includes the areas around these San Bruno landmarks:
Ponderosa Park
Pacific Heights Park
Portola Highlands Park
Monte Verde Park
Golden Gate National Cemetery
Upon approval, a list of specific streets will be published on the CityNet website and updated on status as the upgrade proceeds
Detailed Fiber Upgrade Costs – West of Skyline
Specifics
10 Equipment Cost Cost/Unit Units Cost Labor Cost Cost/Unit Units Cost Calix Chassis $6,700 1 $6,700 Overhead/De-lash and Re-lash Fiber
$7.29 43,000 $313,470
Calix Gpon 8x Cards $7,380 4 $29,520 Lower Span Loops and Re-lash $245 20 $4,900 Fiber Jumps $4 750 $3,188 Redesign To Fiber For GIS
System
$0.75 43,000 $32,250
SFPs $480 32 $15,360 Splicing In 8-way Tap and
Enclosure
$455.55 260 $118,443
Gpon Units 803 $129 500 $64,500 Pole Engineering and Permits $325 260 $84,500 Gpon Units 844 $149 180 $26,820 Run Drops / Remove Old Drop $375 680 $255,000 Fiber 24 Count $1 43,000 $37,410 Connected Units $175 680 $119,000 Fiber Drops $56 700 $39,200 Fusion Splices $43.50 1,500 $65,250 Hardware / Lashing
Wire
$11,000 1 $11,000 Remove Old Coax Cables $1.48 39,000 $57,720 Fiber Connectors $9 1,500 $12,750 Total Labor Cost $1,050,533 8-way Splitters /
Enclosure
$380 260 $98,800
Innotrans
Equipment
$65,000 1 $65,000
Taxes & Shipping $40,355
Total Equipment Cost $450,602 Total Equipment & Construction Cost $1,501,135
Detailed Fiber Upgrade Costs – Northeast of Skyline
Specifics
11 Equipment Cost Cost/Unit Units Cost Labor Cost Cost/Unit Units Cost Calix Chassis
$6,700 1 $6,700
Overhead/De-lash and Re-lash
Fiber
$7.29 36,000 $262,440
Calix Gpon 8x Cards $7,380 4 $29,520 Lower Span Loops and Re-lash $245 20 $4,900 Fiber Jumps $4 750 $3,188 Redesign To Fiber For GIS System $0.75 36,000 $27,000 SFPs $480 32 $15,360 Splicing In 8-way Tap and Enclosure $455.55 270 $122,999 Gpon Units 803 $129 450 $58,050 Pole Engineering and Permits $325 270 $87,750 Gpon Units 844 $149 200 $29,800 Run Drops / Remove Old Drop $375 650 $243,750 Fiber 24 Count $1 36,400 $31,668 Connected Units $175 650 $113,750 Fiber Drops $56 750 $42,000 Fusion Splices $43.50 1,500 $65,250 Hardware / Lashing
Wire $11,000 1 $11,000
Remove Old Coax Cables $1.48 36,000 $53,280
Fiber Connectors $9 1,500 $12,750 Labor Cost $981,119
8-way Splitters /
Enclosure $380 285 $108,300
Innotrans Equipment $65,000 1 $65,000
Taxes & Shipping $40,664
Total Equipment Cost $453,999 Total Equipment & Construction Cost $ 1,435,118
Fiber Upgrade Summary– Phase 2.1 and 2.2
Specifics
12 SUMMARY
Equipment Units Cost Statistics Units
Innotrans Equipment Headend Equipment
$130,000
Pole Count
567
Calix Equipment Headend Equipment
$78,815
Number of Homes
2,116
Other Equipment Field Equipment $614,768 Miles of Overhead Plant 15 Taxes & Shipping $81,018
Total Equipment Cost $904,601 Labor Cost
Pole Cost Permitting $172,250
Construction Cost for Poles $1,301,402
Drop and Home Connections $498,750
Redesign Fiber $59,250
Total Labor Cost $2,031,652
TOTAL EQUIPMENT AND CONSTUCTION COST $2,936,253
13 Fiber Upgrade 2.1 Work Plan
Equipment purchase - CityNet Staff / City Procurement Logistics planning - CityNet Staff / Temporary Project Manager Backyard Fiber Upgrades - Contractor and CityNet Project Team (70%) CityNet Staff on “as available basis” (30% of upgrade) Union pay scales - CityNet Temporary Project Team & Staff Contractor - ad hoc, mini-project basis
Work Plan Summary
Project Manager, 2 Technicians,
Available Staff & Contractors to be
deployed in a hybrid work format.
Every home will be passed by our
fiber. Each customer will have a fiber
drop – true fiber to the home
Planned for Success
Fiber upgrade planned for timely, on budget execution
14 Rollout cost vastly lower than
comparable rollouts – existing
business, experienced team, cost
controls
2 Upgrade Phases, 100% aerial, 567 Poles,
2,116 Homes Passed
7 Overlashing, an FCC permitted
method, will be used to replace
hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) cable with
fiber
Fiber Upgrade Plan 2.1
Timelines
15 Fiber Upgrade 2.1 Work Plan
May – Dec 2023
Fiber Equipment
Procurement
Sept 2023 –
Mar 2024
Contractor
and PM
Recruitment
Dec 2023 –
Mar 2025
Fiber Upgrade
Begins – West
of Skyline
Jan – Jun 2024
Fiber
Technician
Recruitments
Aug 2024 –
Mar 2025
Northeast of
Skyline
Upgrade
Positive ROI from Fiber Investment in San Bruno
PROPERTY ACCESS
RIGHTS UNITS SERVICABLE
HOMES
SUBSCRIBERS (%
SERVICE
PENETRATION)
Peninsula Place
MDU
Non-
exclusive 860 819 (95%) 524 (64%)
Crystal Springs
MDU
Non-
exclusive 437 415 (95%) 216 (52%)
Shelter Creek
MDU
Exclusive
at start 1,296 1,241 (96%) 936 (75%)
Marisol Single
Family (July
2022)
Non-
exclusive 100 100 (100%) 43 (43%)
Total 2,693
(18.3%)
2,575
(96%)
1,719
(67%)
Subscribers generate
$2,201,789 in annual
subscription revenue with
$990,805 (45%) in post
fiber revenue growth
18.3% of San Bruno
homes have San Bruno
Cable’s fiber
Most fibered homes are in
MDUs (96%)
Cost of fiber install:
$2,300,000
16 17
Revenue Upside from Upgrade
CityNet Current Status - 18.3% fiber penetration; 27.5% revenues from fiber
Projected Average Revenue Per User from fiber – $73.25/mo. (current - $103.00/mo. Streaming TV will bring down ARPU, improve margin)
Increase in fiber footprint w/Upgrade – 82% (covers 32% of system) Fiber penetration increase – 15%
Revenue Improvement – up to 35%/year
18 Tap Replacement Program
City’s Active Taps dependent on software server w/o replacement 2,425 Active Taps to be replaced by Passive, non-powered Taps 700 Passive Taps in place – 29% replaced
Tap Replacements to proceed in step with proposed upgrade Tap replacement focus – areas not covered by Fiber Upgrade 2.1 Replacement method – Staff (75%), Contractors (25%)
Benefit – Maintains operational continuity
19 Request for Council Action
Consider Adoption of Resolution to authorize the City
Manager to allocate $3 million from the City of San
Bruno’s Development Impact Fees to fund the planned
San Bruno CityNet Services upgrade to fiber technology
in designated areas of San Bruno
Comments or Questions?
Thank you!
20