Temporary Elements:
◆ Outdoor Dining Strips: Along both sides of the street, 8-footwide outdoor dining strips will offer temporary spaces for dining, creating a dynamic, social environment that supports local businesses and activates the streetscape. Outdoor dining can also expand to include the 5-foot tree strip zone if additional capacity is needed (see Figure 3.15)
◆ Festival and Market Arrangement: The street design for the 600 & 800 blocks of Laurel Street are configured to accommodate temporary events and festivals with space for 10- foot x10-foot booths along each side and a 20-foot clear zone in the center for pedestrian circulation and fire access (see Figure
3.16)
◆ Seasonal Public Art Displays: A rotating display of public art featuring local artists and sculptors will provide a platform for interactive education and place-making. These temporary installations will enhance the cultural identity of the space and foster community engagement.
9090 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 585
FIGURE 3.17 - 600 BLOCK OF LAUREL STREET AND NEW PLAZA
A new plaza on the 600 Block of Laurel Street offers a flexible, multi-use plaza, programmable for year-round activities, a multi-use pavilion and space along the south edge for pop-up businesses Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 91
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 586
EL CAMINO REAL-THE GRAND BOULEVARD
The design of El Camino Real, as illustrated in Figure 3.18, defines it as a multimodal regional corridor, aligned with the vision of the Grand Boulevard Initiative. The design strategy follows the grand boulevard character, featuring two travel lanes in each direction with a dedicated center turn lane along a landscaped median. It supports multimodal transportation by incorporating key elements such as protected bike lanes, widened sidewalks, and in-lane bus stops to offer a comprehensive multimodal experience. To achieve this, one of the three southbound lanes is removed, consistent with the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. On-street parking is maintained on the west side to ensure convenient access to businesses along El Camino Real.
Key Design Features:
◆ Dimensions: Building face-to-building face width:112 feet, and curb-to-curb width of 82 feet
◆ Travel Lanes: Two travel lanes in each direction, supported by a center turn lane to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion, ensuring efficient vehicular operations.
◆ Widened Sidewalks: In accordance with the San Carlos
Zoning Ordinance, sidewalks are expanded to 20-feet on the west side with additional width created by building setbacks, offering a safer, more accessible environment for pedestrians, thereby enhancing the walkability of the corridor.
◆ Protected Bike Lanes: Each direction includes a 5-foot-wide protected bike lane, separated from vehicular traffic by a 3-foot buffer for added safety. This design supports both the Grand Boulevard Initiative and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan’s aim to foster a cyclist-friendly environment.
◆ Sidewalk Activation: Ground-floor uses along El Camino Real spill onto the sidewalks, contributing to a vibrant, interactive streetscape that promotes social engagement and bolsters local businesses on the west side.
◆ Parking: On-street parking is preserved on the west side of El Camino Real, supporting parking, delivery, and flexible pickup/drop-off functions, meeting the needs of businesses and visitors while maintaining accessibility along the corridor. ◆ Public Transit Integration: In-lane bus stops streamline transit operations by providing efficient, direct access for buses without impeding traffic. This feature supports multimodal transit options, improving connectivity and ease of movement for commuters and visitors.
9292 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 587
FIGURE 3.18 - PROPOSED STREET SECTION – EL CAMINO REAL
(LOOKING NORTH)
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 93
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 588
ARROYO AVENUE
The design of Arroyo Avenue, as illustrated in Figure 3.19, follows the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, emphasizing a pedestrian and bicycle friendly character. It adheres to the proposals outlined in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan by converting it into a designated bike boulevard that leads to the Caltrain (Arroyo Avenue) underpass and connects to the East Side Innovation District. The Avenue comprises one travel lane in each direction and allows for shared use with bicycles. The cross-section features a wider, tree-lined sidewalk on the north side, which is designed to facilitate outdoor dining and enhance the pedestrian experience. In contrast, the south side features a narrower, tree-lined sidewalk along with on-street parking to accommodate parking needs.
Key Design Features:
◆ Dimensions: The total right-of-way is 50 feet with curb-to-curb width: 28 feet
◆ Travel Lanes: The design incorporates one travel lane, measuring 10 feet in width, in each direction to facilitate efficient vehicular movement.
◆ Widened Sidewalks: A 17-foot-wide sidewalk on the north side of the Avenue accommodates outdoor dining for existing businesses, while the south side features an 6-foot-wide sidewalk, ensuring ample space for pedestrian circulation.
◆ Some outdoor dining strips will have awnings to ensure comfort and use separation from the walking zone, while also maintaining visual coherence throughout the streetscape. 5-foot wide tree strips are designed adjacent to the pedestrian zone for shade and comfort.
◆ Bicycle Priority Avenue: Each direction includes a shared bike lane, reinforcing the Avenue’s designation as a bicycle priority corridor or “bike boulevard”. The narrower travel lanes, along with additional features, such as speed-calming measures and reduced posted speeds, enhance safety, and encourage cycling.
This configuration aligns with the objectives of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, promoting a cyclist-friendly environment. ◆ Parking: Existing on-street parking spots are retained on the south side of Arroyo Avenue, accommodating parking needs, delivery services, and flexible pick-up/drop-off operations to support local businesses and enhance accessibility.
◆ PUDO (Pick-up/ Drop-off): Delivery services, and flexible pick-up/drop-off operations to support local businesses and enhance accessibility.
9494 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 589
FIGURE 3.19 - PROPOSED STREET SECTION – ARROYO AVENUE
(LOOKING EAST)
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 95
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 590
CHERRY STREET AND OLIVE STREET
The design of Cherry Street and Olive Street follow a bicycle and pedestrian friendly character. They share a similar cross-section featuring one travel lane in each direction, with on-street parking and tree-lined sidewalks on both sides. Their design enhances the pedestrian experience while also playing a key role in vehicular connectivity by providing access to nearby alleys. This connectivity supports local circulation and contributes to efficient traffic flow within the downtown core.
Key Design Features:
◆ Dimensions: The total right-of-way is 50 feet, with a curb-tocurb width of 38 feet. ◆ Travel Lanes: The design includes one travel lane in each direction, each measuring 11-feet wide, to ensure smooth and efficient vehicular movement.
◆ Sidewalks: A 6-foot-wide sidewalk on both sides provides adequate space for pedestrian circulation, promoting walkability and safety.
◆ Parking: On-street parking is incorporated to accommodate parking needs, deliveries, and flexible pick-up/drop-off operations, as illustrated in the plan (see Figure 3.10 and 3.11). This ensures convenient access to local businesses and services.
◆ Pedestrian experience: Tree grates are proposed to be evenly distributed in between every two street parking spaces. Those planters will have seatings facing sidewalks for people to pause and rest.
9696 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 591
FIGURE 3.20 - PROPOSED STREET SECTION – CHERRY AND OLIVE STREETS (LOOKING EAST)
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 97
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 592
3.4 MID-LAUREL +
SOUTH LAUREL (SOLA)
NEIGHBORHOODS
With the shift in existing neighborhood density and characteristics from a busy commercial segment –north of Arroyo Avenue – to a quieter mixed-use residential zone – south of Arroyo Avenue --, Laurel Street along the Mid-Laurel and SoLa neighborhoods follows an adaptive design strategy. As illustrated in Figure 3.21, the Parkway Character (promoting green infrastructure and adaptive landscaping within the setback zones) balances traffic movement with green infrastructure and pedestrian-friendly features.
The design of Brittan Avenue plays a key role in strengthening regional traffic circulation while strengthening east-west bicycle and pedestrian connectivity, serving as a critical link in the transportation network. The characteristics of Laurel Street segments in Mid-Laurel and SoLA are detailed below:
900 BLOCK
9898 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 593
FIGURE 3.21 - MID-LAUREL AND SOLA (SOUTH OF LAUREL) ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN LAUREL ST.
1000 BLOCK 1100 BLOCK
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 99
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 594
The Parkway Character on this segment
of Laurel Street is translated into green
spaces and green canopy cover, as
illustrated in Figure 3.22. This street also
highlights the ecological values of the
neighborhood, such as the Pulgas Creek
tributary running diagonally between Arroyo
Avenue and Morse Boulevard at the 900
block of Laurel Street. Green infrastructure
is proposed along the pedestrian sidewalk
together with other public amenities such
as benches, shades, and trash cans,
providing a comfortable pedestrian-walking
environment.
FIGURE 3.22 - SOUTH OF ARROYO STREET AXONOMETRIC
(SECTION CUT AT 900 BLOCK OF LAUREL)
LAUREL STREET, SOUTH OF ARROYO
10010 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 595
Permanent design elements:
◆ Entry plazas with seating at the Morse Boulevard intersection and the Brittan Avenue intersection are planted with accent trees (Golden Raintree or Crape Myrtle) and other street trees to provide shade and visual interest.
◆ A formalized planting strip in the sidewalk along the curb with context-appropriate trees (more visual screening and high water retention capacity) to enhance visual coherence.
◆ Ecological art crossing with floral motifs and special plaza paving at the 900 block of Laurel Street recognizing Pulgas Creek running underground. Raingarden and bio-swales for stormwater retention occur at the same crossing point. Sinuous benches are provided along the edge of the raingarden for resting and social activities.
◆ Street parking is located on either side of the street with some preserved to maintain the parking capacity.
Temporary design elements:
◆ Outdoor dining strips up to 8-feet wide are located along commercial/restaurant frontages. The landscape setback
characteristic of this south-of-Arroyo neighborhood can add to the Parkway Character by utilizing setbacks for additional planting or frontage patios for businesses.
BRITTAN AVENUE
The design of Brittan Avenue, as illustrated in Figure 3.23, reflects the objectives of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, positioning the Avenue as an important bicycle corridor connecting to the east side and to Old County Road, as well as its role as a regional connector that links San Carlos to the US-101 Highway and the broader Bay Area. The design emphasizes a balanced approach, accommodating both vehicular and bicycle traffic, and enhancing connectivity with the East Side Innovation District.
◆ Dimensions: The total right-of-way is 56-feet, with a curbto-curb width of 34-feet, offering ample space for multimodal transportation needs.
◆ Travel Lanes: One 11-foot-wide travel lane in each direction, along with 10-foot-wide center turn lane to facilitate efficient traffic flow and accommodate left turns, reducing congestion. ◆ Sidewalks: 6-foot-wide sidewalk on both sides of the Avenue, providing safe and accessible pathways for pedestrians. ◆ Bike Lanes: The design includes a dedicated 6-foot-wide Class II bike lane in each direction.
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 101
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 596
FIGURE 3.23 - PROPOSED STREET SECTION – BRITTAN AVENUE
(LOOKING EAST)
102102 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 597
3.5 THE ALLEYS
The alleys in the downtown core serve a dual purpose: they provide access to surface parking and enhance pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular connectivity. These alleys also play a crucial role in facilitating service access for local businesses. This section outlines key strategies for revitalizing the functionality of alleys, while also proposing design interventions aimed at improving user experience, such as enhancing lighting, incorporating landscaping, and integrating art elements to create more inviting and multi-functional spaces. 700 BLOCK (WEST) AS A MODEL
The 700 Block (West) alley serves as a model for successful alley configuration and provides 108 publicly accessible surface parking spaces. Accessible from Cherry and Olive Streets, this alley significantly enhances traffic connectivity in the area. Key strategies implemented, such as improved striping and marking of the alley, secondary business entrances, service and delivery access, and the strategic placement of trash enclosures, could be effectively replicated in the alleys on the east side of Laurel Street to optimize functionality and accessibility.
RE-ORGANIZED ALLEYS
The goal of the alley re-organization plan is to optimize existing parking resources and circulation as shown in Figure 3.4. The key strategies for reconfiguring these alleys include:
◆ Re-organization of Parking: The parking layout will be redesigned to balance both private and public spaces,
streamlining surface parking and facilitating smoother vehicular access to adjacent businesses. This will ensure that parking availability is optimized without compromising traffic flow. ◆ Screened Dumpsters & Equipment: To improve the aesthetic quality and functionality of the alleys, dumpsters and other service-related equipment will be consolidated into screened enclosures. This not only creates a cleaner environment but also enhances the organization of these essential service areas. ◆ Secondary Business Entrances: Enhancements to secondary entrances for businesses, particularly for restaurants, will improve accessibility for both patrons and service deliveries. Special attention will be given to ADA-compliant entrances, reflecting business owners’ feedback about the need for improved ADA parking, especially in the 700 block of Laurel Street’s east alley.
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 103
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 598
3.6 MATERIALS PALETTE
Informed by community input and reflecting the desires of residents, this section delves into the material palette—including furnishings, lighting, pavement, and planting—that defines the distinct street characters outlined in earlier sections. Building on the street character typology, network recommendations, and public realm strategies discussed previously, this chapter focuses on how material choices contribute to a cohesive and culturally resonant streetscape.
The goal is to create a strong sense of community, honoring San Carlos’ cultural and natural heritage while celebrating its unique assets. Climate-resilient, California-native species are prioritized for the planting palette, ensuring that they thrive in high-traffic urban areas. Community feedback, particularly the enthusiasm for pollinatorfriendly plants, directly informs the selection of rain garden species.
Additionally, there is a strong preference for permeable materials and natural colors and textures, with an emphasis on durability and lowmaintenance design. Coherence in design language and a consistent color scheme are also key elements that the community values, shaping the overall aesthetic of the streetscape.
◆ Alley Activation through Placemaking: The alleys can be revitalized by incorporating placemaking elements that encourage pedestrian use and social interaction. This includes adding smallscale public art, decorative lighting, and greenery. These features will transform the alleys from purely utilitarian spaces into inviting pedestrian-friendly environments that contribute to the overall vibrancy of the downtown area.
◆ EV Charging Integrated Parking: To align with the project’s sustainability goals and accommodate increasing demand for electric vehicles, EV charging stations will be integrated into the re-organized parking layout. This will provide convenient charging access for EV users while maintaining the overall parking capacity.
By implementing these strategies, the alleys on the east side of Laurel Street will improve downtown circulation, maintain parking efficiency, and enhance the experience for both pedestrians and vehicles. 104104 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 599
EL CAMINO REAL
GRAND BOULEVARD CHARACTER
El Camino Real will feature materials that reflect the scale and prominence of this important arterial as it defines the eastern edge of the downtown area. It is characterized by warm tone furnishing and paving, in the darker range of this color palette. Larger metal and natural stone components will be incorporated to convey a sense of civic formality and grandeur. Sample swatches and application examples are provided in Figure 3.24.
Summary of the key elements in terms of furnishing
and planting:
◆ Lighting Fixtures: Two-headed lighting fixtures in contemporary style will be implemented along medians and sidewalks of El Camino Real to enhance visibility, and aesthetic coherence of the existing streetscape. They will accommodate community banners for easy installation.
◆ General Street Trees: Quercus Virginiana ‘Sky Climber’ will provide an attractive upright form for the streetscape of El Camino Real. In its maturity, this species further ensures a stronger structural resilience to storm events.
◆ Median Planting: Platanus Racemosa ‘Roberts’ will provide great height and canopy appropriate to the Grand Boulevard Character. Additional benefits range from reduced maintenance costs to pruning frequency, low water use, and better rain interception during winter months.
◆ Entry Nodes Planting: Trees like Koelreuteria and the California-native Muskogee Crape Myrtle provide vibrant accent color and visual interests, marking the entry nodes to the Downtown Core. For Koelreuteria, subspecies “paniculata” has its bloom in yellow, while “elegans” has its flower in pink. ◆ Raingarden/ Bioretention planting: Carex Pansa, Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’, Iris Douglasiana, and Sesleria Autumnalis are recommended for bioretention benefits and as pollinator garden species.
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 105
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 600
FIGURE 3.24 - MATERIAL & FURNISHING STRATEGY
FOR GRAND BOULEVARD (EL CAMINO REAL) AND CIVIC
CHARACTER (SAN CARLOS AVE, CHERRY STREET)
Pedestrian
Walkway
Material
Planting Strip Material
(Between the pedestrian
walkway & the edge of the
Streetscape Furnishing Material
(Benches, sculptural elements, signage, trash
can, street lights, etc.)
Pole Light
CIP Smooth
Concrete
Permeable
Concrete Paver
Tactile
Concrete Paver Natural Wood
Natural Stone
(Larger Blocks)
Metal with
Powdercoat Finish
Lighting Fixture Section View Gateway Monument
Application Examples:
106106 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 601
Sky Climber Southern Live Oak
Quercus Virginiana ‘Sky Climber’
Along El Camino Real streetscape,
for large scale and form
Sand Dune Sedge
Carex Pansa
Inside raingardens, grove understory
California Sycamore
Platanus racemosa ‘Roberts’
Along El Camino Real Median, for
scale and form
Island Pink Yarrow
Achilea millefolium ‘Island Pink’
Grove understory
Goldenrain Tree
Koelreuteria paniculata
At median + entry plaza, for accent
colors
Douglas Iris
Iris Douglasiana
Inside raingardens
Muskogee Crape Myrtle
Lagerstroemia indica x fauriei ‘Muskogee’
At median + entry plaza, for accent
colors
Autumn Moor Grass
Sesleria Autumnalis
Inside raingardens, grove understory
FIGURE 3.25 - PLANTING STRATEGY FOR GRAND
BOULEVARD CHARACTER (EL CAMINO REAL)
Raingarden Plants: Pollinator Garden Plants: California Native Plants:
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 107
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 602
SAN CARLOS AVENUE
& CHERRY STREET
CIVIC CHARACTER
San Carlos Avenue and Cherry Street both serve as gateways to the downtown and as primary connector streets to the Civic Center. They share the same material palette with the Grand Boulevard Character, which is characterized by warm tones and a darker color palette (see figure 3.24). Larger metal and natural stone components will be incorporated to convey a sense of civic formality and grandeur.
Summary of the key elements in terms of furnishing
and planting:
◆ Lighting Fixtures: Two headed lighting fixtures in contemporary style will be implemented along medians and sidewalks to enhance visibility, aesthetic coherence with the rest of the streetscape design. They will also accommodate community banners for easy installation.
◆ General Street Trees: Quercus suber is suitable as the unifying street tree species with its upright branching structure, unique bark texture and broad canopy for shades.
◆ Entry Plaza Planting: Koelreuteria and the California-native Muskogee Crape Myrtle provide nice accent color and visual interests to mark the entry points into the street.
◆ Raingarden/ Bioretention planting: Carex Pansa, Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’, Iris Douglasiana, and Sesleria Autumnalis are recommended for bioretention benefits and as pollinator garden species.
108108 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 603
FIGURE 3.26 - PLANTING STRATEGY FOR CIVIC CHARACTER
(SAN CARLOS AVE AND CHERRY STREET)
Cork Oak
Quercus suber
Along streetscape, for shade and form.
Sand Dune Sedge
Carex Pansa
Inside raingardens, grove understory
Goldenrain Tree
Koelreuteria paniculata
At median + entry plaza, for accent
colors
Muskogee Crape Myrtle
Lagerstroemia indica x fauriei ‘Muskogee’
At median + entry plaza, for accent
colors
Autumn Moor Grass
Sesleria Autumnalis
Inside raingardens, grove understory
Raingarden Plants: Pollinator Garden Plants: California Native Plants:
Island Pink Yarrow
Achilea millefolium ‘Island Pink’
Grove understory
Douglas Iris
Iris Douglasiana
Inside raingardens
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 109
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 604
600, 700 & 800 BLOCKS OF LAUREL STREET
+ HARRINGTON PARK & NEW PLAZA
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE AND PLAZA
CHARACTER
The 600, 700, and 800 blocks of Laurel Street serve as the downtown’s social and business core and are distinguished by materials in warm tones and a lighter color palette, enhancing human scale and pedestrian-oriented experience of the public realm. The paving patterns incorporate greater variation to enrich the visual and tactile quality of the streetscape. Wooden elements are generously deployed into this character zone to create warm and inviting social atmosphere, highlighted by the custom benches and the pavilion structure at Harrington Park and the new plaza on the 600 Block of Laurel Street.
For more detailed sample swatches and application examples, see Figure 3.27.
Plaza Character (Harrington Park, Centennial Plaza and New Plaza) These spaces are the center of programmed activities. They will incorporate materials consistent with those used in the Laurel Street pedestrian promenade. Detailed sample swatches and application examples are provided in Figure 3.27.
Summary of the key elements:
◆ Lighting Fixtures: Types of lighting in this segment include smart light poles with Wi-Fi hotspot and charging outlets, Catenary lights above-ground and across some dining zones and plaza spaces, illuminated bollards, and strip lighting integrated with the site furnishing.
◆ General Street Trees: Platanus racemosa ‘Roberts’ provides an attractive visual presence with its pyramidal form and dense canopy during the hot season. As California-native species, they typically establish themselves at a fast rate and provide increased resilience over time.
◆ Entry Plaza Planting: Trees like Koelreuteria and the California-native Muskogee Crape Myrtle provide nice accent color and visual interests to mark the entry points into the street. ◆ Raingarden/ Bioretention planting: Quercus gambelii is an excellent riparian tree for the raingarden area, complimented by its golden fall foliage and high tolerance during the heavy wet-dry cycles. Carex Pansa, Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’, Iris Douglasiana, and Sesleria Autumnalis are recommended for bioretention benefits and as pollinator garden species. 11010 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 605
Natural Wood
Natural Stone
(Smaller Blocks)
FIGURE 3.27 - MATERIAL & FURNISHING STRATEGY FOR
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE AND PLAZA CHARACTER (600, 700,
AND 800 BLOCKS OF LAUREL STREET AND NEW PLAZAS)
Central Pedestrian
Promenade, Centennial Plaza,
Planting Strip and Sidewalk
Material
Planting Strip Material
(Between the pedestrian
promenade and the sidewalk)
Stage and
Seating Material
Streetscape
Furnishing Material
(Benches, sculptural elements,
signage, trash can, street lights, etc.)
Mural Art Pop Up Stores Geometric Paving
Pattern
Stage Canopy Sculptural Seating
Street Pole Light Light Fixture Section
View
Play Equipment
CIP Smooth
Concrete Stone Bricks
Permeable
Concrete Paver
Tactile
Concrete Paver
Colorful
Powdercoated
Metal
Plaza Application Examples: Promenade Application Examples:
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 111
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 606
FIGURE 3.28 - PLANTING STRATEGY FOR PEDESTRIAN
PROMENADE AND PLAZA CHARACTERS (600, 700, AND
800 BLOCKS OF LAUREL STREET AND NEW PLAZAS)
Western Sycamore
Platanus racemosa ‘Roberts’
Along streetscape, for shade, large
scale and form
Sand Dune Sedge
Carex Pansa
Inside raingardens, grove understory
Gambel Oak
Quercus gambelii
Inside raingardens, for accent color
and shade
California Fuchsia
Epilobium Canum ‘Everett’s Choice’
Inside raingarden
Goldenrain Tree
Koelreuteria paniculata/ Koelreuteria
elegans
At median + entry plaza, for yellow/
pink accent colors
Douglas Iris
Iris Douglasiana
Inside raingardens
Muskogee Crape Myrtle
Lagerstroemia indica x fauriei ‘Muskogee’
At median + entry plaza, for pink
accent colors
Autumn Moor Grass
Sesleria Autumnalis
Inside raingardens, grove understory
Raingarden Plants: Pollinator Garden Plants: California Native Plants:
11212 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 607
MID-LAUREL AND SOLA
PARKWAY CHARACTER
Laurel Street along the Mid-Laurel and SoLa neighborhoods will transition into the Parkway Character, utilizing an earthy, lesssaturated color palette and more naturalistic materials such as drift wood to reflect the local ecological context. Detailed sample swatches and application examples are provided in Figure 3.29.
The Parkway Character focuses on diversifying the tree selections instead of having a unifying species for the entire linear planting strip.
Existing trees are kept integral as much as possible, with addition of new trees where shade is lacking, or where additional planting spaces are present such as in the bulb-outs and landscape setback zones. Trees with denser canopies and unique branching structures are preferred here, better adapting to the varying landscape set back nature of the street segment while providing visual screening for the residential and mixed-use buildings.
Summary of the key elements:
◆ Lighting Fixtures: Types of lighting implemented in this segment include single-headed light poles and tree lighting to provide softer illumination, and reduced glare. Dual-headed fixtures can be selectively installed at key intersections or neighborhood entry points for enhanced visibility.
◆ General Street Trees: A mix of native oak species is proposed such as Quercus suber, Quercus tomentella, and Quercus
engelmannii to create a diverse urban forest feel. Platanus racemose “Roberts’, Aesculus California, and Lyonothamnus floribundus ssp. aspleniifolius are proposed for landscape frontage areas.
◆ Raingarden/ Bioretention planting: Similar raingarden understory plants as specified in section 3.6.3 are deployed for resilience and habitat benefit.
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 113
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 608
FIGURE 3.29 - MATERIAL & FURNISHING STRATEGY
FOR PARKWAY CHARACTER (LAUREL STREET,
SOUTH OF ARROYO AVENUE )
Natural Wood
Natural Stone
(Smaller Blocks)
Central
Pedestrian
Walkway
Material
Planting Strip Material
(Between the pedestrian walkway &
the edge of the sidewalk curb)
Streetscape
Furnishing Material
(Benches, sculptural elements,
signage, trash can, street lights, etc.)
CIP Smooth
Concrete
Permeable
Concrete Paver
Tactile
Concrete Paver
Metal with
Powdercoat
Finish
Wood Seating Creek Crossing Tree Lighting Street Pole Light Application Examples:
11414 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 609
FIGURE 3.30 - PLANTING STRATEGY FOR PARKWAY
CHARACTER (LAUREL STREET, SOUTH OF ARROYO AVENUE)
Mix of Native Oak Species
Quercus suber, Quercus tomentella, Quercus engelmannii
Along streetscape, for shade and form.
Sand Dune Sedge
Carex Pansa
Inside raingardens, grove understory
California Fuchsia
Epilobium Canum ‘Everett’s Choice’
Inside raingarden
California Sycamore
Platanus racemosa ‘Roberts’
At creek crossing, for scale and form.
California Buckeye
Aesculus Californica
Landscape frontage, for unique form
and texture.
Autumn Moor Grass
Sesleria Autumnalis
Inside raingardens, grove understory
Catalina Ironwood
Lyonothamnus floribundus ssp.
aspleniifolius
Landscape frontage, for unique form
and texture.
Raingarden Plants: Pollinator Garden Plants: California Native Plants:
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 115
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 610
3.7 PUBLIC ART
Public art in the downtown streetscape
enhances the visual appeal and identity
of the area, creating a more inviting and
vibrant atmosphere. It fosters community
engagement by offering spaces for cultural
expression and interaction, making the
downtown experience more meaningful.
Additionally, public art can promote local
culture and history, contributing to a sense of
place and pride among residents and visitors.
According to community feedback, the
top three ways that the community wants
to experience art throughout downtown
San Carlos are through gathering spaces
(88%), murals (70%), and public streetscape
elements (61%). These findings highlight the
community’s desire for more engaging and
interactive public spaces that integrate art
into the fabric of downtown.
FIGURE 3.31 - ONLINE STREET CHARACTER SURVEY
RESULT – PUBLIC ART
11616 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 611
Recommendations to integrate public art in
the downtown core streetscape:
◆ More Platforms for Local Artists: The
city should provide more opportunities
for local artists and designers to exhibit
their work in seasonal art installations
throughout downtown. These flexible
exhibitions will enhance the cultural
vibrancy of the area while showcasing
local talent.
◆ Large Sculptures and Monuments:
The city should install larger sculptures
and monuments at key gateways and
intersections, such as the area across
from the San Carlos Caltrain Station
at El Camino Real and San Carlos
Avenue, as well as near Centennial
Plaza spaces. These installations can
serve as significant landmarks and
enhance the aesthetic appeal of these
vital pedestrian-oriented areas.
◆ Incorporating Cultural Elements: The
incorporation of cultural motifs, including
references to the city’s sister-city
concept, in public murals and surface
designs can help create a welcoming
and globally-minded atmosphere in
downtown. These artistic interventions
could be featured on walls, crosswalks,
entry plazas and other urban surfaces,
contributing to a more immersive and
meaningful streetscape experience.
Recommended locations for public art
installation:
◆ Street Intersections: Intersection at El
Camino Real and the Caltrain Station, at
San Carlos Avenue and Laurel Street,
and at the mid-block crossing in the
900 block of Laurel Street are some of
the key nodes for installation of public
art such as sculptural gateway element,
surface paintings on walls or pedestrian
crossings.
◆ Plazas and Parks: Harrington Park
in the 700 block of Laurel Street, new
plaza at the 600 block of Laurel Street,
or Temporary Plaza near Bianchini’s
Market provide opportunities for
elevated public art experience with
murals, sculptures, and other painted
street furnishing with cultural and
ecological motifs.
◆ Along Sidewalks and Pedestrian
Strips: The entire 600, 700, and 800
blocks of Laurel Street can be closed
off from vehicular access on special
occasions to accommodate temporary
local artist exhibitions.
◆ Public Art Master Plan: Follow the City’s
Public Art Master Plan and consider
updates to reflect the City of San
Carlos’ unique identity, promote cultural
expression, and enhance the public realm
by integrating art into key civic spaces,
infrastructure, and community hubs.
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 117
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 612
EL CAMINO REAL
SAN CARLOS
STATION
WALNUT ST.
SAN CARLOS AVE.CHERRY ST.OLIVE ST.
1100 BLOCK 1200 BLOCK
600 BLOCK 700 BLOCK
LAUREL ST.
The Public Realm Illustrative Plan
showcases how the proposed streetscape
and public space design elements, outlined
in the previous sections, come together to
create a cohesive and integrated downtown.
New Plaza at 600 Block Centennial Plaza at 700
800
11818 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 613
FIGURE 3.32 - SAN CARLOS PROJECT AREA PUBLIC REALM
0 100 200 300 ft
0 BLOCK
Special Pavers
at 800 Block
Ecological Art
Crossing
900 BLOCK 1000 BLOCK 1100 BLOCK
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 119
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 614
3.8 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
Green infrastructure will be incorporated throughout all street segments within the Project Area to mitigate the impacts of extreme weather events and provide key environmental benefits such as passive-cooling, carbon sequestration, and rainwater interception. The overarching goal is to foster a climate-forward, sustainable future that supports all living creatures co-existing in the urban system.
The downtown core area, along the 600, 700, and 800 blocks of Laurel Street, follows the “Urban Garden Concept” featuring groves with flowering trees and raingardens. Those raingardens will both function as a passive recreation space for humans and a resilience apparatus for stormwater management. Tree grates are 5x5 feet and interconnected underground with expanded soil trenches to ensure better rainwater percolation and root growth.
The planting strips along El Camino Real will feature the same street planting pattern and strategies. Species such as Platanus Racemosa ‘Roberts’ are recommended as general street trees with their structural resilience against storms and great rainwater interception capacity during the winter months.
Laurel Street in the SoLa neighborhood (the 900 block of Laurel Street and beyond) will feature raingardens with more adaptive planting palette and forms to respond to the existing landscape setbacks. Instead of separated planting cells, a continuous green strip will be applied along the street
3.9 PARKING
To effectively evaluate the potential impacts of proposed streetscape changes, a comprehensive inventory and occupancy survey of all public and private on- and off-street parking spaces in the downtown area was completed. This assessment was carried out during midday, early evening, and late-night hours to gauge parking demand at various times of the day, including a special survey on Thursday, Saturday, and a Sunday during the Farmer’s Market.
◆ Parking Inventory: Over 3,100 on- and off-street parking spaces, private and public, were inventoried throughout the downtown area roughly bounded by El Camino Real, Holly Street, Elm Street, and Brittan Street.
◆ Occupancy Levels: High parking occupancy levels were noted in certain areas, such as the 600 and 800 blocks of Laurel Street and the public off-street lots on the 700 block of Laurel Street.
Conversely, areas like Walnut and Elm Streets, the SamTrans garage, Wheeler garage, and Caltrain lot exhibited sparse occupancy. On Thursday between 12-1 p.m., roughly 60% of all spaces were occupied, marking this as the peak parking period for the downtown as a whole.
◆ Impact of Streetscape Changes: The proposed streetscape changes will necessitate the removal of 47 on-street parking spaces on San Carlos Avenue and Laurel Street. With a current total of 1,150 on-street spaces downtown, this removal represents a 4% reduction in available parking.
120120 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 615
◆ Available Parking During Peak Hour (Thursday, 12-1
p.m.): An analysis of peak parking demand reveals 73 empty parking spaces within one block of Laurel Street at peak hours, suggesting that sufficient parking is available for motorists, even with the removal of 47 spaces. Additionally, at least 144 empty public spaces were found in the Wheeler garage, along with another 29 spaces within the immediate Downtown core.
◆ Sufficiency of On-Street Parking: Generally, the on-street parking supply appears adequate to meet anticipated demand.
However, the accompanying Downtown Specific Plan will require the incorporation of parking management strategies to optimize parking use, enhance turnover, and improve availability for various users, including employees, residents, and patrons.
◆ Proposed Parking Management Strategies: Drawing on best practices from other communities, the parking management plan will explore a range of strategies, including regulation and pricing, shared parking opportunities, new parking sites, permitting and enforcement, and parking and transportation demand
management for new developments.
◆ Alignment with City Policies: The selection and implementation of these strategies will align with existing City policies, including those outlined in the General Plan, Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, and Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Plan. The City is also working on updating its Transportation Demand Management requirements, along with reforms to off-street and on-street parking regulations; the strategies in the Downtown Specific Plan align with this current work.
◆ Rationale for Space Removal: To create more sidewalk space, facilitate outdoor dining, and establish safe (protected) bicycle lanes, the removal of 47 spaces from the immediate downtown core (specifically the 1100 and 1200 blocks of San Carlos Avenue, the 600 block of Laurel Street, and the 800 block of Laurel Street) is deemed necessary. At peak parking hours, 73 empty spaces exist within one block of Laurel Street, complemented by 144 spaces in the Wheeler parking garage and another 29 spaces within the downtown core. While limited parking is available on the 600 and 800 blocks of Laurel Street and in the lots behind the 700 block, effective management strategies will be developed to promote turnover and designate spaces for those with mobility impairments. Furthermore, the addition of designated pick-up and drop-off zones will not significantly impede the implementation of the proposed street designs.
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 121
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 616
3.10 DOWNTOWN UTILITIES
NETWORK
In 2022, the City initiated an assessment of existing public and private utilities within the San Carlos Downtown Specific Project Area. The assessment produced a study summarizing the general conditions, characteristics and planning level identification of potential upgrades.
Existing public utilities within the Study Area include:
TABLE 3.2
POLICY + IMPLEMENTATION MEASURE MATRIX (STREETS + PUBLIC SPACES)
OWNER SERVICE BASIS OF UNDERSTANDING
City of San Carlos Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drains GIS and Master Plan Documents California Water Service Water Service Service Area Maps Pacific Gas and Electric Electrical and Natural Gas Service Area Maps Comcast Telecommunications Service Area Maps
AT&T Telecommunications Service Area Maps
Sonic Telecommunications Not within area but is servicing the city 12212 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 617
POTABLE WATER
California Water Service (CalWater) has requested the City provide early information on any anticipated increase in demand to assess their system’s capacity adequately. Upgrades to the system will be coordinated between CalWater and the City’s planned street improvements.
WASTEWATER
The report indicates that all sanitary sewer pipelines should be increased to a minimum diameter of 8 inches, with additional upsizing needed for some lines to support future demands. The figure below is based on the City’s GIS data, showing that 6- and 8-inch diameter VCP pipelines on Laurel Street generally drain either northwest or southeast toward collector sewers located on cross streets or alleys.
A 2012 wastewater study that identified groundwater and stormwater intrusion into the sanitary sewer system. As such, the Downtown Specific Plan should assess the sewer system’s capacity to support additional growth, especially under wet weather conditions. Notably, the 2012 study did not cover all lines within the Project Area; those evaluated are represented by dark blue lines in the Figure 3.33, while light blue lines indicate pipelines generally less than 12 inches in diameter.
The 2012 report also suggests upgrades to the collection system along Arroyo and Brittan Avenues within the Project Area. Given current conditions, the existing 6- and 8-inch pipelines could be upsized to 8- and 10-inch pipes respectively, utilizing pipe-bursting techniques along the existing alignment.
Additionally, the City’s video inspections of the wastewater pipelines and manholes was conducted in 2013, and do not reflect the current condition of the infrastructure. Conducting a thorough assessment in line with National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) standards is recommended.
FIGURE 3.33 - 2012 WASTEWATER ANALYSIS
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 123
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 618
FIGURE 3.34 - EXISTING CITY SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ALONG LAUREL STREET 124124 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 619
STORMWATER
The report identifies that a portion of the Project
Area, particularly near Pulgas Creek, falls within
the FEMA-designated flood zones AO and AE,
indicating flood risk. Key insights include:
◆ Existing storm drainpipes within the area vary
in diameter from 12 to 18 inches, with some
locally reaching 24 to 27 inches. Generally,
an 18-inch diameter pipe is considered the
minimum size required to manage low flow
conditions. Despite this, small rain events
or incidental water releases, such as utility
breaks or hydrant flushes, are likely to exceed
the capacity of these systems.
◆ It remains unclear why 18-inch diameter
pipelines are inadequate for conveying low
flows, as noted in the report. Additionally, the
Study Area is mostly flat and at low ground
elevation relative to the Bay and is subject to
tidal influences and sedimentation. This results
in capacity limitations in the stormwater
conveyance system due to the tidal influence.
However, the City of San Carlos completed
a Storm Drain System Master Plan in 2017,
which outlines recommended upgrades to
several pipelines within the Project Area,
depicted in the Figure 3.35.
FIGURE 3.35 - 2017 STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN PIPELINE UPGRADES
WITH STUDY AREA
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 125
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 620
ELECTRICAL
This Plan calls for developing electrical infrastructure to support street lighting, convenience outlets, and EV charging stations. All street lighting will adhere to the Illuminating Engineering Society’s guidelines for roadway lighting, ensuring uniform and consistent illumination standards. The lighting will utilize LED technology with a color temperature below 3,000 K and will be designed to minimize light pollution, adhering to dark sky guidelines.
Level 2 Electric Vehicle (EV) chargers will be installed within the public right-of-way, generally operating on a 240-volt AC circuit at 40 amps and strategically placed throughout the streetscape , consideration should be given to the utilization of smart poles to limit above grade infrastructure. The City will collaborate with a charging station operator to manage and provide charging services.
The project will also install convenience outlets in plaza areas to support electrical needs for audio and video applications . Additionally, 240-volt outlets rated at 30 amps will be provided to support food vendors in designated locations.
The City will coordinate with Pacific Gas and Electric to install the main electrical services at various points within the project area, supplying feeder circuits for these electrical needs.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
The project will provide internet access throughout the downtown area via wireless connections. This will be achieved by installing wireless repeaters on streetlights , ensuring consistent coverage with connection speeds of at least 100 Mbps.
Each repeater will connect to a single-mode fiber optic network linked to City Hall, supporting an Ethernet network operating at 10 Gbps.
This fiber optic network will be connected to the City’s main internet provider at City Hall through a dedicated, physically separate network connection.
COORDINATION WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES
The Downtown Specific Plan includes coordinating with public utilities serving the Study Area to determine capacity deficiencies in anticipation of additional development. As of the writing of this Streetscape Master Plan, no models have been created for the area, therefore a qualitative assessment will be conducted in collaboration with utility providers to gain a comprehensive understanding of their needs. This information will facilitate the development of recommendations for pipeline and system upgrades, along with associated costs.
126126 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 621
FIGURE 3.36 - ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING CONDITIONS WITHIN
STREETSCAPE AND SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY AREA
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 127
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 622
3.11 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
SURVEY CONSIDERATIONS:
Book B of Maps, recorded in 1888, established the property lines within the downtown core of the Study Area. The subdivision of blocks illustrated in Book 8 of Maps, pages 25 and 26, recorded on October 7, 1912, serves as the basis for property descriptions for many parcels. Final Map 2016-01, shown in Book 140, Page 93, addresses the right-of-way along San Carlos Avenue and the 600 block of Laurel Street, while another map clarifies a portion of the right-of-way on Laurel Street’s 700 block. These maps indicate that Laurel Street has a right-of-way width of 60 feet, as illustrated in the following figures.
It appears that some alleys and parking areas east of Laurel Street were recorded on the 1912 map. After reviewing property deeds, it seems these areas were expanded through dedications to the City of San Carlos during development. Limited recorded documents, such as survey records or parcel maps, were found within the Study Area, indicating that establishing the right-of-way necessitated the resolution and filing of Records of Survey with San Mateo County .
Numerous underground systems may require upgrades in conjunction with surface improvements. Understanding these needs, along with phasing and costs, is essential to ensure that streetscape enhancements are appropriately budgeted and can be implemented swiftly. Therefore, the following tasks are recommended for areas identified to receive streetscape improvements, as depicted in the sketch below.
◆ Coordinate with CalWater to determine which pressure zone will be appropriate for any future development within the Study area. ◆ CalWater has requested early notification and coordination as developments and street improvements projects are identified to determine system improvements required.
◆ Coordinate with PG&E to ascertain future power requirements. 128128 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 623
FIGURE 3.37 - A PORTION OF THE SEPTEMBER 4, 1888,
BOOK B OF MAPS AT PAGE 19 ILLUSTRATING ORIGINAL
PROPERTY LINES ALONG LAUREL STREET
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 129
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 624
FIGURE 3.38 - A PORTION OF 1912
PARCEL MAP THAT SUBDIVIDED
PARCELS AND IS THE BASIS FOR
MANY PROPERTIES WITHIN THE
STUDY AREA.
130130 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 625
FIGURE 3.39 - EXCERPTS FROM
FINAL MAP 2016-01 BOOK 140 PAGE
93 THAT ILLUSTRATE THE RIGHT
OF WAY ALONG THE 600 BLOCK OF
LAUREL STREET AND SAN CARLOS
AVENUE.
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 131
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 626
ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
WITHIN PROJECT AREA
As a part of this assessment, the follow documentation was developed to assess the existing infrastructure:
◆ Topographic Data Acquisition: Topographic data was acquired using area photogrammetry techniques based on NAVD88 and NAD83. An orthorectified photograph was obtained within the specified boundary, and detailed topography was created to illustrate the locations of buildings, sidewalks, streets, and tree canopies. This data was supplemented with field surveying to collect the building faces at key locations, as canopies may obscure their locations. If future projects progress, the collected data can be extended.
◆ Right-of-Way Confirmation: The right-of-way for the 600 and 700 blocks of Laurel Street was confirmed per the recorded final maps, and the right-of-way along the 800 block of Laurel Street will be resolved. A Record of Survey was filed with San Mateo County for this resolution.
◆ Utility Systems Mapping: As-built records of all utility systems were acquired, and their locations were plotted on the topographic map. The locations of utility infrastructure were confirmed through Underground Service Alert markings, as well as the locations of surface appurtenances within the detailed study area.
◆ Infrastructure Measurement: The rim and invert of storm drain and sanitary sewer infrastructure within the detailed study area was measured.
To complete the assessment existing infrastructure the following should be completed:
◆ Video Inspection: A video inspection of wastewater and storm drain pipelines, manholes, and inlets will be completed within the entire Project Area to document current conditions.
Once the location and phasing of the streetscape are formally defined, the City could initiate the collection of design-level topographic data for surface elevations and site features. Depending on the final surface of the street, a high-definition scan of the corridor may be recommended. Finally, identifying utilities within the project area through ground-penetrating radar and potholing is advisable. 132132 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 627
FIGURE 3.40 - EXCERPT FROM THE 777 WALNUT CREEK
CONDOMINIUMS FINAL MAP SHOWN IN BOOK 140 PAGE
61 OF MAPS ILLUSTRATING PARTIAL RESOLUTION OF THE
700 BLOCK LAUREL STREET’S RIGHT OF WAY.
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 133
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 628
3.12 WAYFINDING
The wayfinding strategy for the Downtown San Carlos Streetscape Master Plan builds upon the city’s existing wayfinding project’s objective to help drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians get around our city in the most efficient way possible. The signage system is proposed to help direct people to downtown, public parking, the Caltrain station and other important locations in San Carlos.
The wayfinding signage are categorized as:
◆ Gateway Wayfinding
◆ Placemaking Wayfinding
◆ Pedestrian Directional Wayfinding
◆ Bicycle Directional Wayfinding
◆ Vehicular Directional Wayfinding
◆ Kiosk Directory Signs
GATEWAY WAYFINDING:
Gateway wayfinding for Downtown San Carlos is essential for creating a welcoming entry point that enhances visitor orientation, reinforces local identity, create sense of arrival as people enter the heart of the city.
Aligning with the gateway wayfinding project, the Streetscape Master Plan considers the gateway wayfinding typology in Figure 3.41 Gateway treatments could be introduced at the following major gateways to enhance the sense of arrival.
◆ In the sidewalk zone at the intersection of El Camino Real and San Carlos Avenue, a major access point to the downtown. ◆ In the sidewalk zone at the intersection of El Camino Real and Arroyo Avenue, a bicycle and pedestrian connector between the East-side Innovation District and the Downtown Core.
◆ In the sidewalk zone at the intersection of El Camino Real and Brittan Avenue, which serves as a critical connector for regional traffic and east-west bike and pedestrian pathways.
The propose d strategy for the intersection of El Camino Real and San Carlos Avenue is illustrated in Figure 3.42. A vertical monument could be introduced on the either side of the San Carlos Avenue to mark the sense of arrival into the downtown Can Carlos and beyond.
The inclusion of murals, sculptures, or thematic art at these intersections will heighten the aesthetic appeal while enhancing the functional aspect of wayfinding.
134134 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 629
FIGURE 3.41 - GATEWAY WAYFINDING TYPOLOGY (Source: City of San Carlos Wayfinding Plan) FIGURE 3.42 - GATEWAY STRATEGY FOR THE INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO REAL AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE, A MAJOR ACCESS POINT TO THE DOWNTOWN.
PROJECT CLIENT
2979_City Wayfinding City of
PROJECT CLIE
2979_City Wayfinding City
SAN CARLOS
S
A
N
C
A
R
L
O
S
S
A
N
C
A
R
L
O
S
S
S
A
N
C
A
RLO
S
S
A
N
C
A
RLO
S
SAN CARLOS
V40
Gateway
Tall Median
V43
Gateway
Horizontal
V45
Gatew
Monu
PROJECT CLIENT
2979_City Wayfinding City of San
PROJECT CLIENT
2979_City Wayfinding City of
SAN CARLOS
S
A
N
C
A
R
L
O
S
S
A
N
C
A
R
L
O
S
SAN
S
A
N CA
R
L
O
S
S
A
N CA
R
L
O
S
S
A
N
C
A
RLO
S
S
A
N
C
A
RLO
S
SAN CARLOS
V40
Gateway
Tall Median
V43
Gateway
Horizontal
V45
Gatewa
Monum
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 135
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 630
PLACEMAKING
WAYFINDING:
Standardized Signage for placemaking will be
strategically placed throughout the downtown
core to guide both pedestrians and drivers
efficiently. These signs will maintain a
cohesive visual language to create sense of
belonging in the downtown core.
Placemaking signs, in the form of a street
light pole banner are recommended at
strategic locations on San Carlos Avenue,
Laurel Street, Arroyo Avenue, Brittan
Avenue and community destinations in the
Project Area as illustrated in the Figure
3.43. HOLLY ST
OLD COUNT
BRITTAN AVE
COMMERC
LAUREL ST
CHERRY ST
ELM ST
SAN CARLOS AVE
SAN CARLOS AVE
CEDAR ST
ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS
10 EL CAMINO REAL
EL CAMINO REAL
Museu
Train
Station
Library
Burton Park
City Hall Park
Harrington
Park
Laureola
Park
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
P Entrance
(opening 2018) Arguello Park
Cedar Park
k
Hillcrest
Circle Park
P40-S-067
P40-S-092
P40-S-094
P40-S-099
P40-S-093
P40-S-095
P40-S-098
P40-S-100
P40-S-072
P40-S-076
P4
P40-S-073
P40-
FIGURE 3.43 - PLACEMAKING WAYFINDING STRATEGY FOR THE PROJECT AREA. (Source: City of San Carlos Wayfinding Plan)
E SHEET #
Wayfinding
1.0 BACK
V10
CLIENT DATE 1 SHEET TITLE SHEET #
2 3
4 Vehicular Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017 1.0
PARKING DIRECTIONAL
V25
PROJECT CLIENT DATE 1 SHEET TITLE SHEET #
2 3
4 Vehicular Wayfinding City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017 1.0
LIST DIRECTIONAL
P30
Downtown .1 mi 2 min
Bay Trail 1.1 mi 6 min
D OW NT OW N
10 min walk10 min walk
SAN CARLOS
PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL
P10
PLACEMAKING SIGN
P40
MAP KIOSK
P20
D OW N T O W N
City Hall
Library
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
D O W N T O W N
PROJECT CLIENT DATE 1 SHEET TITLE SHEET #
2 3
4 Vehicular Wayfinding City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017 1.0
ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0”
10 min walk
P20
City Hall
Library
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
D O W N T O W N
PROJECT CLIENT DATE 1 SHEET TITLE SHEET #
2 3
4 Vehicular Wayfinding City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017 1.0 P
P A R K I N G
P U B LI C
PARKING DIRECTIONAL
V25
RKING IDENTIFICATION
V30
SAN CARLOS
SAN CARLOS
SAN CARLOS
S
A
N CA
RLO
S
S
A
N CA
RLO
S
SAN CARLOS
V30
Parking
Identification
V45
Gateway
V47
Gateway
P10
Pedestrian
Directional
P40
Placemaking
Sign
P30
Bicycle
Directional
Downtown .1 mi 2 min
Bay Trail 1.1 mi 6 min
D OW NT OW N
136136 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 631
PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL
WAYFINDING
Pedestrian directional wayfinding
provides clear guidance for navigating key
destinations, improving accessibility and
enhancing the downtown experience from
pedestrian point-of-view. Strategically placed
at key intersections including the intersection
of San Carlos Avenue and Laurel Street, at
the Caltrain station and along Laurel Street,
it ensures seamless movement and easy
access to major civic and recreational sites
as illustrated in Figure 3.44.
FIGURE 3.44 - PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL WAYFINDING STRATEGY FOR THE PROJECT AREA. (Source: City of San Carlos Wayfinding Plan)
PROJECT CLIENT DATE SHEET TITLE
2979_City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Sept 10, 2021
HOLLY
O
BRITTAN AV
LAUREL ST
CHERRY ST
ELM ST
SAN CARLOS AVE
SAN CARLOS AVE
CED
ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS
EL CAMINO REAL
MINO REAL
Train
Station
Library
City Hall Park
Harrington
Park
Laureola
Park
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
P Entrance
(opening 2018) Arguello Park
Cedar Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
P10-S-052
P10-S-053
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Downtown
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
City Hall
Library
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Downtown
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
City Hall
Library
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
P10-S-051
P10-S-004
P10-S-046
P10-S-063
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Downtown
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
City Hall
Library
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Downtown
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
City Hall
Library
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Downtown
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
City Hall
Library
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Downtown
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
City Hall
Library
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Downtown
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
Harrington
Park
City Hall
Library
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
A B
Sign Locations
PEDESTRIAN
EDGEWOOD RD
EDGEWOOD RD
HOLLY ST
OLD COUNTRY RD STAFFORD ST
BRITTAN AVE BRITTAN AVE
INDUSTRIAL RD
COMMERCIAL ST
HOWARD AVE
LAUREL ST
CHERRY ST
ELM ST
SAN CARLOS AVE SAN CARLOS AVE
CEDAR ST
MELENDY DR BRITTAN AVE
ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS
ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS
101
280
EL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL
SOUTH
LAUREL
INDUSTRIAL
ARTS DISTRICT
Hiller Aviation MuseumAirport
Train
Station
Library
Burton Park
City Hall Park
Highlands Park
Crestview Park
Harrington Park
Laureola
Park
Community Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
P Entrance (opening 2018) Arguello Park
Eaton Park
Big Canyon
Park
Cedar Park
Chilton Park
San Carlos Ave
Neighborhood Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Heather Dog
Exercise Area
P10-S-052
P10-S-053
City Hall Library Adult Community Center Harrington Park DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNDowntown City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNHarrington Park City Hall Library Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center Harrington Park DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNDowntown City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNHarrington Park City Hall Library Train Station
DOWNTOWN
P10-S-051
P10-S-004
P10-S-046
P10-S-063
City Hall Library Adult Community Center Harrington Park DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNDowntown City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNHarrington Park City Hall Library Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center Harrington Park DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNDowntown City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNHarrington Park City Hall Library Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center Harrington Park DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNDowntown City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNHarrington Park City Hall Library Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center Harrington Park DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNDowntown City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNHarrington Park City Hall Library Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center Harrington Park DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center Train Station
DOWNTOWN
Harrington Park
Train Station
DOWNTOWN
City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNCity Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNDowntown City Hall Library Adult Community Center DOWNTOWNHarrington Park City Hall Library Train Station
DOWNTOWN
A B
Key Plan NOT TO SCALE
N
PROJECT CLIENT DATE 1 SHEET TITLE SHEET #
2 3
4 Vehicular Wayfinding City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017 1.0
ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0”
BICYCLIST DIRECTIONAL
P30
Downtown
.1 mi 2 min
Bay Trail
1.1 mi 6 min
DOWNTOWN
10 min walk10 min walk
SAN CARLOS
PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL
P10
PLACEMAKING SIGN
P40
MAP KIOSK
P20
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
DOWNTOWN
P10
Pedestrian
Directional
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 137
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 632
BICYCLE DIRECTIONAL WAYFINDING
Bicycle directional wayfinding helps cyclists navigate city routes safely and efficiently, directing them to key locations like transit centers, bike parking, and popular destinations. Placed along bike lanes, intersections, and near transit hubs, these signs enhance connectivity and encourage a bike-friendly environment. As illustrated in the Figure 3.45, the wayfinding projects have identified key locations to introduce the bicycle wayfinding signage.
FIGURE 3.45 - BICYCLE DIRECTIONAL WAYFINDING STRATEGY FOR THE PROJECT AREA. (Source: City of San Carlos Wayfinding Plan) PROJECT CLIENT DATE 1 SHEET TITLE SHEET #
2 3
4 Vehicular Wayfinding City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017 1.0 ON
SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0”
BICYCLIST DIRECTIONAL
P30
Downtown
.1 mi 2 min
Bay Trail
1.1 mi 6 min
DOWNTOWN
10 min walk10 min walk
SAN CARLOS
PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL
P10
PLACEMAKING SIGN
P40
MAP KIOSK
P20
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
DOWNTOWN
PROJECT CLIENT DATE 1 SHEET TITLE SHEET #
2 3
4 Vehicular Wayfinding City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017 1.0
ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0”
BICYCLIST DIRECTIONAL
P30
Downtown
.1 mi 2 min
Bay Trail
1.1 mi 6 min
DOWNTOWN
10 min walk10 min walk
SAN CARLOS
PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL
P10
PLACEMAKING SIGN
P40
MAP KIOSK
P20
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
Library
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
DOWNTOWN
P10
Pedestrian
Directional
P40
Placemaking
Sign
P30
Bicycle
Directional
138138 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 633
VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL
WAYFINDING
A vehicular directional wayfinding signage
plan consists of three main types of signage:
◆ Vehicular Directional Signage: These
signs guide drivers along roadways,
helping them navigate toward specific
destinations, such as points of interest
or major intersections.
◆ Parking Directional Signage: These
signs direct drivers to available parking
areas, indicating the location of parking
facilities and guiding them to these
spaces.
◆ Parking Identification Signage: These
signs indicate the specific locations of
parking facilities, often located to mark
entranceways to the parking facility.
Additionally, based on the community’s
feedback, the streetscape Master Plan
recommends locating Parking Placement
Signage. These signs indicate the specific
locations of parking spaces within a facility,
often designating spots for different user
types, such as handicapped, reserved, or
general parking. As illustrated in Figure 3.46,
these signage types enhance navigation and
improve the overall parking experience.
FIGURE 3.46 - VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL WAYFINDING
STRATEGY FOR THE PROJECT AREA. (Source: City of San Carlos Wayfinding Plan)
PROJECT CLIENT DATE SHEET TITLE
2979_City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Sept 10, 2021
HOLLY ST
OLD COUNTRY RD
BRITTAN AVE
BR
COMMERCIAL ST
LAUREL ST
CHERRY ST
ELM ST
SAN CARLOS AVE
SAN CARLOS AVE
CEDAR ST
ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS
101
EL CAMINO REAL
EL CAMINO REAL
Hiller
Aviation
Museum
Train
Station
Library
Burton Park
City Hall Park
Harrington
Park
Laureola
Park
Community
Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
P Entrance
(opening 2018) Arguello Park
Cedar Park
Chilton Park
San Carlos Ave
Neighborhood Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
V15-S-001
V10-S-018
V15-S-015
V15-S-016
V15-S-040
V15-S-019 V10-S-020
V10-S-021
V15-S-041
V10-S-029
V10-S-030
V15-S-038
V15-S-042
V15-S-102
V15-S-105 V10-S-115
V10-S-117
V10-S-118
V10-S-116
V15-S-103
V15-S-119
V15-S-110
V10-S-104
V15-S-111
V15-S-112
V15-S-113
V15-S-039
V10-S-101
V15-S-043
V15-S-024
V10-S-017 V10-S-061
V15-S-002
V10-S-062
V15-S-025
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Lau
Par
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Cit
Lib
Ad
Co
Ce
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Do
Tra
Civ
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Dow
Train
Ceda
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park
Ce
Hi
Pa
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtow
Civic Ce
Train Sta
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Dow
Train
Highlands Tra
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Par
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Ad
Co
Ce
Do
Tr
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtow
Train Stat
Cedar St P
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park
Cedar S
Highlan
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Highlands
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Downtown
Adult
Community
Center
Arguello
Park
Arguello
Park
San Carlos
Ave Park
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Arguello
Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Downtown
Adult
Community
Center
Arguello
Park
Arguello
Park
San Carlos
Ave Park
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Arguello
Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Downtown
Adult
Community
Center
Arguello
Park
Arguello
Park
San Carlos
Ave Park
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Arguello
Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Downtown
Adult
Community
Center
Arguello
Park
Arguello
Park
San Carlos
Ave Park
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Arguello
Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Downtown
Adult
Community
Center
Arguello
Park
Arguello
Park
San Carlos
Ave Park
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Arguello
Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Downtown
Adult
Community
Center
Arguello
Park
Arguello
Park
San Carlos
Ave Park
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Arguello
Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
ghlands
ark
eather Dog
ercise
ea
owntown
Arguello
Park
San Carlos
Ave Park
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Arguello
Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
hlands
rk
ather Dog
ercise
ea
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
s
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Eaton Park Eaton Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Eaton Park Eaton Park
Park
rk
w
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
t
ark
o
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Eaton Park Eaton Park
n Park
Park
iew
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
est
Park
llo
Highlands
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Downtown
Adult
Community
Center
Arguello
Park
Arguello
Park
San Carlos
Ave Park
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Arguello
Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Downtown
Adult
Community
Center
Arguello
Park
Arguello
Park
San Carlos
Ave Park
Downtown
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Arguello
Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Chilton Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview
Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Arguello
Park
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
V10 small
V15 large
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Laureola
Park
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Downtown
Cedar St Park
Highlands
Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Highlands
Park
Big Canyon
Park
Crestview
Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Cedar St Park
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Civic Center
Airport
Aviation
Museum
Burton Park Burton Park
Downtown
Laureola
Park
Downtown
Train Station
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
City Hall
Library
City Hall
Dog Park
Downtown
Highlands
Park
Heather Dog
Exercise
Area
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
City Hall
Library
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Burton Park
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station
Civic Center
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Adult
Community
Center
Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
Sign Locations
VEHICULAR
EDGEWOOD RD
EDGEWOOD RD
HOLLY ST
OLD COUNTRY RD STAFFORD ST
BRITTAN AVE BRITTAN AVE
INDUSTRIAL RD
COMMERCIAL ST
HOWARD AVE
LAUREL ST
CHERRY ST
ELM ST
SAN CARLOS AVE SAN CARLOS AVE
CEDAR ST
MELENDY DR BRITTAN AVE
ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS
ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS
101
280
EL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL
SOUTH
LAUREL
INDUSTRIAL
ARTS DISTRICT
Hiller Aviation MuseumAirport
Train
Station
Library
Burton Park
City Hall Park
Highlands Park
Crestview Park
Harrington Park
Laureola
Park
Community Center
DOWNTOWN
City Hall
P Entrance (opening 2018) Arguello Park
Eaton Park
Big Canyon
Park
Cedar Park
Chilton Park
San Carlos Ave
Neighborhood Park
Vista Park
North
Crestview Park
Hillcrest
Circle Park
Heather Dog
Exercise Area
V15-S-001
V10-S-018
V15-S-015
V15-S-016
V15-S-040
V15-S-019 V10-S-020
V10-S-021
V15-S-022
V10-S-107
V10-S-108
V10-S-109
V10-S-120
V15-S-055
V10-S-056
V10-S-057
V15-S-027
V15-S-106
V15-S-028
V15-S-058
V15-S-059
V15-S-041
V10-S-029
V10-S-030
V15-S-023
V15-S-038
V15-S-042
V15-S-102
V15-S-105 V10-S-115
V10-S-117
V10-S-118
V10-S-116
V15-S-103
V15-S-119
V15-S-110
V10-S-104
V15-S-111
V15-S-112
V15-S-113
V15-S-114
V15-S-039
V10-S-101
V15-S-043
V15-S-024
V10-S-017 V10-S-061
V15-S-002
V10-S-062
V15-S-025
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park
Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park
Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park
Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park
Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park
Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park Highlands Park Hillcrest Circle Park Arguello ParkHighlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area Downtown
Adult Community Center Arguello ParkArguello Park
San Carlos Ave Park
Downtown Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Arguello Park Eaton Park Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Eaton Park
Hillcrest Circle Park Hillcrest Circle Park
Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Highlands Park Heather Dog
Exercise Area
Chilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkChilton Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview ParkVista Park North Crestview Park Vista Park North Crestview ParkHillcrest Circle Park Arguello Park V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
V10 small V15 large
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Cedar St Park
Crestview Park Crestview Park Crestview Park
Laureola Park Downtown Civic Center Airport Aviation Museum Laureola Park
Burton Park Burton Park Downtown
Cedar St Park Downtown Cedar St Park Highlands Park
Downtown
Train Station
Highlands Train Station Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Highlands Park Big Canyon Park Crestview
Park
Laureola Park Downtown
Train Station
City Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkCity Hall Library City Hall Dog ParkDowntown Highlands Park Heather Dog Exercise Area
City Hall Library Adult Community CenterCity Hall Library Adult Community CenterDowntown Train Station Civic Center
Burton Park Downtown
Train Station
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown
Train Station Civic Center
Downtown Civic Center Train StationAdult Community Center Downtown Train Station
Downtown Civic Center Train Station
Key Plan NOT TO SCALE
N
PROJECT CLIENT DATE
2979_City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Sept
PROJECT CLIENT D
2979_City Wayfinding City of San Carlos O
PROJECT CLIENT DATE 1 SHEET TITLE SHEET #
2 3
4 Vehicular Wayfinding City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017 1.0
ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0”
PRIMARY VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL
V15
BACK
V15
BACK
V10
SECONDARY VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL
V10
Burton Park
Downtown
Downtown
Civic Center
Train Station
PROJECT CLIENT DATE 1 SHEET TITLE
2 3
4 Vehicular WayCity Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017
ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0”
P
P A R K I N G
P U B LI C
PARKING DIRECTIONAL
V20
PARKING IDENTIFICATION
V30
PROJECT CLIENT DATE 1 SHEET TITLE SHEET #
2 3
4 Vehicular Wayfinding City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017 1.0 SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0”
P
P A R K I N G
P U B LI C
PARKING DIRECTIONAL
V25
PARKING DIRECTIONAL
V20
PARKING IDENTIFICATION
V30
PROJECT CLIENT DATE
City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1,
ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0”
BICYCLIST DIRECTIONAL
P30
Downtown .1 mi 2 min
Bay Trail 1.1 mi 6 min
D OW NT OW N
11 S
PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL
P10
M
City Hall
Library
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
D O W N T O W N
PROJECT
City Wayf
ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0”
City Hall
Library
Community
Center
Harrington
Park
D O W N T O W N
PROJECT CLIENT DATE 1
2 3
4 City Wayfinding City of San Carlos Jan 1, 2017
ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0”
P
P A R K I N G
P U B LI C
PARKING DIRECTIONAL
V20
PARKING IDENTIFICATION
V30
SAN CARLOS
SAN CARLOS SAN CARLOS SAN CARLOS
SANCARLOS
SAN CARLOS SAN CARLOS SAN CARLOS SAN CARLOS
SAN CARLOS SAN CARLOS SAN CARLOS
V15
Vehicular
Directional
Large
V10
Vehicular
Directional
Small
V20
Parking
Directional
V25
Parking
Directional
Tall
V30
Parking
Identification
V40
Gateway
Tall Median
V43
Gateway
Horizontal
V45
Gateway
Monument
P10
Pedestrian
Directional
Proposed Streetscape and Public Space Design 139
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 634
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 635
04 TOWARDS
IMPLEMENTATION
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 636
142 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
4.1 PHASING STRATEGY
The phasing plan to implement improvements contained in the Downtown San Carlos Streetscape Master Plan includes a
strategic, step-by-step approach. Due to the scale and complexity of the project, the phasing plan is designed to minimize disruptions while ensuring continuous community access. The precise sequencing of the phases will be decided by the San Carlos City Council, however, to inform that discussion, an initial phasing plan is presented in Figure 4.1.
Each phase in these alternatives focuses on targeted zones within the downtown core, prioritizing areas based on factors such as pedestrian flow, infrastructure needs, and budgetary considerations. This phased approach allows for flexibility and adaptation as the project progresses, ensuring that the improvements align with the long-term vision for the area. Key phases, mapped across different streets, aim to gradually enhance the downtown core, these phases are:
◆ Phase 1A – Harrington Park: Improvements to enhance its usability and attractiveness, complementing the new pedestrian plaza and providing a platform for performances and public gathering to increase multi-purpose usage of the park.
◆ Phase 1B - 700 block of Laurel Street: Initial improvements focused on creating a pedestrian plaza, aligning with the city’s strategy for increased walkability in downtown.
◆ Phase 2 – 600 Block East Alley Parking Improvements:
Reorganization of alleyways and parking spaces for improved parking efficiency, flow, and pedestrian experience. This phase also includes infrastructural improvements including installation of EV changing stations.
◆ Phase 3 - 600 Block Laurel Street and the New Plaza:
Further improvements on Laurel Street to extend the cohesive streetscape design strategy and continue pedestrian-friendly experience in the downtown core. This phase also includes improvements at the new plaza to create a vibrant public space by introducing a performance space, gathering spaces and popup markets. ◆ Phase 4 - San Carlos Avenue 1100 Block: Improvements to introduce the Civic character as discussed in Chapter 3, to make
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 637
Towards Implementation 143
San Carlos Avenue a welcoming complete street for all.
◆ Phase 5 - 700 and 800 Block Alleyways: Reorganization of alleyways and parking spaces for improved parking efficiency, flow, and pedestrian experience. This phase also includes infrastructure improvements including installation of EV changing stations.
◆ Phase 6 – 800 Block Laurel Street: Improvements on Laurel Street to extend the cohesive streetscape design strategy as introduced in Phase 1B and continue pedestrian-friendly experience in the downtown core.
◆ Phase 7 – Arroyo Avenue: Improvements to Arroyo Avenue to support an enhanced pedestrian experience, bicycle connections and on-street parking.
◆ Phase 8 – Olive Street: Improvements to Olive Street to support an enhanced pedestrian experience, bicycle connections and on-street parking.
◆ Phase 9 – Cherry Street (between El Camino Real and
Walnut Street): Improvements to Cherry Street to support an enhanced pedestrian experience, bicycle connections and onstreet parking. ◆ Phase 10 – Walnut Street: Improvements to Walnut Street to support an enhanced pedestrian experience, bicycle connections and on-street parking.
◆ Phase 11 – Elm Street: Improvements to Elm Street to support an enhanced pedestrian experience, bicycle connections and onstreet parking. Additionally, this phase will include introduction of a crosswalk connecting City Hall to the pedestrian paseo leading to Walnut Street and through the arched walkway out to the new plaza at the 600 block.
◆ Phase 12 – San Carlos Avenue 1200 Block and Cherry
Street (between Walnut and Elm Street: Improvements
on the 1200 block of San Carlos Avenue to introduce the Civic character as discussed in Chapter 3, to make San Carlos Avenue a welcoming complete street for all. Simultaneously, improvements to introduce pedestrian-bicycle friendly character on Cherry Street between Walnut and Elm Street
◆ Grand Boulevard Initiative Phase: The City should continue to collaborate with SamTrans, who is overseeing the Grand Boulevard Initiative. San Carlos will implement transformation of El Camino Real through alignment of policies and plans, and develop an Action Plan and coordinated Project Initiation Document.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 638
144 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
FIGURE 4.1 - INITIAL PHASING STRATEGY
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 639
Towards Implementation 145
4.2 FUNDING STRATEGY
Implementing the Streetscape Master Plan for the downtown is crucial for transforming the city’s downtown core into a vibrant, well connected and pedestrian-friendly realm that meets the multimodal goals and serves residents, businesses, and visitors alike.
However, realizing this vision hinges on securing adequate funding to cover design, construction, and long-term maintenance costs.
Without the necessary financial support, the transformative potential of the Streetscape Master Plan could remain unrealized, delaying improvements that would significantly enhance the quality of life in downtown San Carlos.
Table 4.1 shows the approximate budgets needed to implement all phases of the plan. These phases would be implemented over a longterm program as prescribed by the San Carlos City Council.
Funding is essential not only for aesthetic upgrades, such as aspects associated with visual and pedestrian experience, but also for critical infrastructure improvements with underground utilities. Moreover, addressing environmental sustainability through the incorporation of green infrastructure, such as stormwater management systems, adds further financial demands. Given the breadth of the Master Plan’s scope, securing multiple funding sources will be key to ensuring the project’s success without placing undue strain on local budgets.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 640
146 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
* Depends on coordination with Caltrans and funding availability.
TABLE 4.1
DRAFT IMPLEMENTATION COST ESTIMATES FOR EACH PHASE
PHASE STREET DESIGN COST
2024
CONSTRUCTION
COST
ENGINEERING 2024 DEVELOPMENT
COST
0 El Camino Real (Holly to Arroyo) * $1,379,232 $13,792,323 $2,068,848 $17,240,403 1 Laurel Street - Cherry to Olive
Street (700 Block)
$813,037 $8,130,370 $1,219,556 $10,162,963
1.1 Harrington Park (700 Block) $370,771 $3,707,706 $556,156 $4,634,632
1.2 Alley Parking Improvements $24,460 $244,600 $36,690 $305,750
1.2 Wheeler Parking Garage
Improvements
$8,594 $85,938 $12,891 $107,422
2 North Alley - San Carlos to Cherry $574,014 $5,740,144 $861,022 $7,175,180 3 Laurel Street - San Carlos to
Cherry (600 Block)
$756,440 $7,564,403 $1,134,660 $9,455,504
3 New Plaza (on 600 Block) $263,052 $2,630,524 $394,579 $3,288,156 4 San Carlos Avenue - El Camino
Real to Walnut Avenue
$710,908 $7,109,080 $1,066,362 $8,886,350
5 South Alley - Cherry to Arroyo $374,067 $3,740,667 $561,100 $4,675,834 6 Laurel Street - Olive to Arroyo
(800 Block)
$579,507 $5,795,067 $869,260 $7,243,834
7 Arroyo - El Camino Real to Walnut $308,636 $3,086,360 $462,954 $3,857,950 8 Olive - El Camino Real to Walnut $467,403 $4,674,029 $701,104 $5,842,537 9 Cherry Street - El Camino to
Walnut
$530,804 $5,308,036 $796,205 $6,635,045
10 Walnut Avenue $930,813 $9,308,131 $1,396,220 $11,635,164 11 Elm Avenue $706,830 $7,068,299 $1,060,245 $ 8,835,374 12 Cherry Street - Elm to Walnut $286,770 $2,867,704 $430,156 $3,584,630 12 San Carlos Avenue - Walnut to Elm $397,272 $3,972,720 $595,908 $4,965,900 TOTAL $9,482,610 $94,826,103 $14,223,915 $118,532,628
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 641
Towards Implementation 147
POTENTIAL FUNDING AND GRANT
OPPORTUNITIES:
There are several state and federal grants available that could provide critical funding for the San Carlos Streetscape Master Plan:
◆ Sustainable Communities Grant: This grant is offered by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and is designed to support projects that promote sustainable transportation and livable communities. The Streetscape Master Plan’s focus on improving pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure aligns well with the goals of this grant.
◆ Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant: Caltrans also offers grants specifically for transportation planning, which could help fund the early stages of streetscape design, including studies on traffic flow, pedestrian access, and safety improvements. ◆ Streets for All Grant: This grant supports projects aimed at creating safer, more accessible streets for all users, including pedestrians, cyclists, and public transit riders. Given the Streetscape Master Plan’s emphasis on multimodal transportation and complete streets, this funding could provide essential support for implementation.
◆ Active Transportation Program (ATP): Administered by
Caltrans, the ATP is focused on increasing walking and biking through safe infrastructure. The Streetscape Master Plan’s pedestrian-friendly design, bike lanes, and traffic calming measures make it a strong candidate for this grant.
◆ Federal Infrastructure Funding: As part of broader
infrastructure initiatives, federal funding opportunities may be available, especially in programs focused on urban revitalization, sustainable infrastructure, and climate resilience. Examples include the BUILD (Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development) Grant and potential funding through the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).
◆ Green Streets and Stormwater Management Grants:
Programs such as the California Urban Greening Grant could be leveraged to integrate environmental sustainability features, like permeable pavements and green stormwater infrastructure, into the streetscape design.
◆ Municipal Bonds: In addition to state and federal grants, the City of San Carlos could issue municipal bonds as a potential source of funding to finance large-scale infrastructure projects such as streetscape improvements. By spreading the costs over a long period, the City can mitigate the financial impact on its budget while accelerating the implementation of the Streetscape Master Plan.
◆ The One Bay Area Grant (OBAG): This grant is administered by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, provides local communities with funding to enhance transportation infrastructure, including bicycle and pedestrian improvements.
This grant supports projects that promote safer, more accessible, and sustainable mobility options across the region.
By exploring and applying for a combination of these funding opportunities, the City of San Carlos can secure the financial resources needed to implement the Streetscape Master Plan, creating a downtown area that is more equitable, vibrant, economically vital, sustainable, and livable for all.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 642
148 San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
This page intentionally left blank.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 643
San Carlos Downtown Streetscape Master Plan 149
This page intentionally left blank.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 644
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 645
RESOLUTIN NO. PTC205- A RESOLUTIN OF THE PLANIG AND TRANSPOI COMISN OF THE CITY OF SAN CARLOS RECOMNDIG THA THE CITY COUNIL ADOPT THE SAN CARLOS DOWNT STRECAP MASTER PLAN. WHERAS, the City Council of the City of San Carlos has made the planig for the futre of its downt one of its top straegic objectivs since 201, begin with the adoptin of its 201 Straegic Plan and was reafimd during its City Council Retra on Janury 21, 20, and agin on Janury 27, 203 and Janury 18, 204; and WHERAS, betwn Augst 20 throug Septmbr 204, hundres of particns atend 18 difernt civ engamt evnts and oprtunies inclusve of survey, workshp, open house, and study seion with the Econmi Devlopmnt Advisory Comisn, Parks Recration and Cultre Comisn, Youth Advisory Council, Planig and Transpoti Comisn, and City Council; WHERAS, targed outreach include particon from downt busine, SamTrns staf, and advoctes from Silcon Valey Bicyle Coalitn and San Carlos Bikes; and WHERAS, betwn June 20 throug March 204, the Downt Advisory Comite (‘DTAC”) held sevn metings to provide input on prosed stre design; and WHERAS, on March 19, 204, the DTAC endors a prefd stre design as part of the San Carlos Downt Strescap Master Plan project; and WHERAS, on May 20, 204 the Planig and Transpoti Comisn provide input to staf on the DTAC’s prefd stre design and tesing and modeling of trafic and parking outcmes; and WHERAS, on June 10, 204, the City Council provide input to staf and adopte Resolutin 204-67 afirmng the stre design for tesing and modeling of trafic and parking outcmes; and WHERAS, on Septmbr 3, 204, refinmts to stre design and key findgs from trafic and parking studie wer presntd to the DTAC, Econmi Devlopmnt Advisory Comisn, Parks Recration and Cultre Comisn, Planig and Transpoti Comisn, and the Youth Advisory Council during an Al-Comisn Special Joint Meting; and WHERAS, on Septmbr 23, 204, the City Council adopte Resolutin 204-1 endorsig final stre design. NOW, THERFO BE IT RESOLVD tha the Planig and Transpoti Comisn of the City of San Carlos recomnds tha the City Council adopt the San Carlos Downt Strescap Master Plan. R K | herby certify tha the foregin Resolutin was duly and regulay pased and adopte by the Planig and Transpoti Comisn of the City of San Carlos at a schedul meting therof held on the 7" day of April 205, by the folwing vote:
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 646
AYES, COMISNER: Bundy, Anad, Castned, Garvey ABSENT, NOES, COMISNER: COMISNER: None Clemnts Elen Garvey VICE CHAIR of the Plain Comisn ranspoti TES: Andrea Mardesich, Asitan Comunity Devlopmnt Directo Exhibt A: San Carlos Downt Strescap Master Plan
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 647
1 April April 7th Planning and Transportation Commission Meeting on Downtown Streetscape Master Plan
Transcript of Commissioner Questions & Comments and Staff & Consultant Responses
On the Downtown Core:
Commissioner Castaneda asked, concerning the 700 block of Laurel, whether umbrellas would be an option given that there would be outdoor dining, and if there would be any continuity in the canopies.
Lisa Porras responded that awnings and umbrellas would be allowed to provide shade and cover for diners. She clarified that such guidelines would be outlined in the Downtown Specific Plan regulatory document, which would include regulations for materials and design. The Streetscape Master Plan provides the space for outdoor dining to occur.
Commissioner Castaneda inquired about how parking spaces would be marked on the curbless 600 and 800 blocks of Laurel.
Jim Stickley responded that at the street, parking spots would be marked by striping and that at the sidewalk, demarcation would be in the form of tactile pavers.
Commissioner Castaneda added that she was satisfied with the tree strip also serving to protect pedestrians from traffic.
Commissioner Anand asked if a protected bike lane meant a physical, vertical barrier.
Jim Stickley clarified that on El Camino Real and San Carlos Avenue, the protected bike lane referred to a 3-foot buffer without a vertical barrier. He added that during the construction process, further protection could be provided, such as at intersections. On Brittan, where there is not sufficient space to provide a horizontal buffer, the design would include flexible pylons.
Commissioner Anand asked if green paint on the bike lanes would be possible.
Jim Stickley responded that this would be possible.
Commissioner Anand asked what the markings would look like on street segments where the roadway is shared between bikes and cars.
Jim Stickley responded that the standard “sharrow” symbol would be used.
Commissioner Anand asked whether there could be accommodation for further signage, for example, reading “Share the Lane,” citing recent collisions between vehicles and bikes.
Jim Stickley responded that the city would be able to add such signage.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 648
2 Commissioner Anand asked whether there could be a canopy to go above the plazas to protect from rain, citing that downtown sees less activity during rain.
Jim Stickley clarified that the two plazas at Harrington Park and on the 600 block of Laurel would have pavilion structures that are impermeable, protecting visitors to downtown from the rain.
Commissioner Bundy asked for an explanation of how the design of the entrances to the 700 block plaza provide a safe transition between cyclists on the roadway to the slower pace of the pedestrian promenade.
Jim Stickley explained that the 700 block is a dismount zone, which would require enforcement.
Dismounting would be encouraged by design in the form of signage or painted logos reading “dismount zone.” This design and enforcement would also apply to the entrance to Harrington Park from the adjacent alley.
Commissioner Bundy asked how drainage would be managed during heavy storms, particularly concerning the curbless design of the streets.
Jim Stickley responded that the staff and consultant team is working with the City’s civil engineer to manage rainwater on Laurel Street. Runoff would be directed toward the permeable rain gardens via the use of trench drains. He clarified that this system requires appropriate sizing for each element to ensure that they work efficiently.
Commissioner Bundy raised a concern that vehicles might accidentally turn into the former Wheeler Plaza parking area due to the pavers which continue from the street to the new plaza.
She asked if there was a different configuration for Wheeler Plaza during “business as usual” compared to during festivals and farmer’s markets.
Jim Stickley clarified that the plaza would have design that prevents cars from driving into the plaza with a row of bollards, and that parking on Laurel Street adjacent to the plaza could still be allowed during normal operations.
Commissioner Bundy asked how the design ensured ADA-compliant access for people with disabilities to access downtown.
Jim Stickley stated that accessibility was implemented into the design, such as in the curbless design of the street. Every element of the design will follow ADA standards for accessibility.
Vice Chair Garvey asked for an explanation of how retractable bollards work.
Jim Stickley explained that the bollards retract below the surface of the plaza using hydraulics.
He added that retractable bollards are currently in use in Redwood City, which shares a Fire District with San Carlos. Staff and the consultant team are working with the Fire Department to assess their preferences for the bollards.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 649
3 Vice Chair Garvey asked if there was still a plan to integrate electric vehicle charging into light poles on the 600 and 800 blocks.
Jim Stickley explained that smart poles would incorporate EV charging and power sources for festivals and other uses and added that similar poles could be incorporated into the alleys.
Vice Chair Garvey asked how the driveway at US Bank would be reworked to allow for the fully pedestrianized plaza.
Jim Stickley explained that the team is working actively with the US Bank branch to reconfigure the site’s circulation to loop back to the alley, allowing for a full pedestrian plaza on the 700 block.
On Mid-Laurel and South Laurel Street
Commissioner Castaneda commented that she would like to see bikes routed away from the block between El Camino and Laurel on Brittan, citing heavy traffic coming from 101, 280, and onto adjacent alleys. She added that Arroyo might be a safer alternative.
Jim Stickley agreed that this corridor presented a challenge and added that the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan follows the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The team plans to ensure that the redesign of Brittan Avenue improves safety for cyclists.
Vice Chair Garvey asked if rain gardens would be added on the Mid- and South Laurel segments.
Jim Stickley stated that the plan will include rain gardens on these segments and that current tree strips could be retained.
On the Alleys
Vice Chair Garvey asked why the 700 block alley would be reconstructed after the 600 block alley, given that the city will be reconstructing Harrington Park on the 700 block.
Jim Stickley stated that the 600 block alley was chosen to be reconstructed sooner because the 600 block will be losing parking spaces, and this could be mitigated by improved parking conditions in the 600 block alley.
Vice Chair Garvey recommended that the council consider looking at the phasing order. She asked where the short-term parking would be placed for delivery and pick up services and if any such spaces would be in the alleys.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 650
4 Jim Stickley confirmed that the alleys are an option for short-term parking, adding that the consultant team is developing a comprehensive parking strategy and that parking resources will continue to be part of management of the Downtown core.
Commissioner Castaneda added that the alleys being completed could help ensure access to merchants when the Laurel Street segments are being reconstructed.
Jim Stickley stated that the plan can be tailored to the community’s needs as implementation occurs and need not be static.
Commissioner Bundy asked how the rollout of improved secondary entrances and trash facilities facing the alley would take place.
Jim Stickley stated that secondary business entrance and trash improvements would be their own discreet project and that the objectives are that dumpsters are enclosed and that deliveries can happen efficiently, with parking being a shared resource.
Vice Chair Garvey asked about the location of utility lines.
Jim Stickley stated that all utilities would be underground, including power.
Vice Chair Garvey suggested that undergrounding all utilities at once rather than as part of the phasing may be more cost-efficient.
On Materials, Public Art, Green Infrastructure, Parking, and Wayfinding Commissioner Castaneda asked about the use of oak trees, and if any would be on Laurel.
Jim Stickley stated that the species are undergoing some changes as the plan gets more specific.
He stated that the rain gardens will have oak trees but that the street trees on Laurel would be the western sycamore, with crape myrtle at the alley entrances.
Commissioner Anand asked how the current bus stops on El Camino Real and San Carlos Avenue are being addressed.
Jim Stickley confirmed that the bus stops would be retained and that they use an island design, allowing for continuous safe bike lanes that do not conflict with the bus right of way.
Commissioner Bundy asked whether local tribes have been or will be consulted as part of the rollout of artwork honoring cultural influences.
Jim Stickley responded that tribes will be consulted as the public art rollout takes place.
On Implementation
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 651
5 Commissioner Castaneda asked whether it is feasible to implement infrastructure and utility upgrades one block at a time.
Jim Stickley said that making the upgrades while the street is already undergoing reconstruction is likely to be cost-efficient, but that this plan is being made in consultation with the civil engineer and that they will pursue best practice.
Vice Chair Garvey commented that pursuing grant funding to help pay for the project may require reordering the implementation plan to work within the required timeframes of grants that are made available. She expressed that the City Council should be open to these considerations to maximize the use of grant funding, such as those supporting bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure.
Jim Stickley agreed, stating that the plan is able to be agile and work around available funding.
Public Comment
A member of the public commented that programming that occurs only during rain would be a good way to encourage the downtown to remain active during those times, such as windchimes, musical elements, or serving hot cocoa. She added that the screens would need to block wind coming down from the north, given the north-south orientation of Laurel Street. She added that the armory in Redwood City incorporates a tactile barrier that requires bikes to stop and dismount, and something similar could be implemented at the 700 block plaza. She also suggested that the needs and interests of teenagers need to be incorporated into downtown.
Jennifer Rossi commented that she and her family experience safety issues crossing El Camino at Cherry, Arroyo, and San Carlos Avenue, and she said that the plan looks like it will help with bike and pedestrian safety. She asked when El Camino would be implemented, as it is not in the implementation plan. She agreed that teens need options for activities, food, and services downtown.
Lisa Porras explained that the team has worked with the Parks and Recreation Department to accommodate activities for residents and visitors of all ages, and that programming could be rotational and dynamic. The team has also reached out to the Youth Advisory Council to assess what they want to see downtown. The team is also looking closely at ground floor land uses to allow and encourage uses that serve teens.
Lisa Porras added that the reconstruction of El Camino Real is governed by Caltrans and SamTrans and requires coordination with Belmont and Redwood City. San Carlos is working with SamTrans to submit a unified plan to upgrade the El Camino Real Corridor throughout San Mateo County as part of the Grand Boulevard Initiative.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 652
RESOLUTIN NO. 204 - 1 A RESOLUTIN OF THE CITY COUNIL OF THE CITY OF SAN CARLOS ENDORSIG THE REFIND STRE DESIGN FOR THE DOWNT SPECIF PLAN AND STRECAP MASTER PLAN PROJECT. WHERAS, the City Council of the City of San Carlos has made the planig for the futre of its downt one of its top straegic objectivs, as orignaly set forth in the City’s adopte 201 Straegic Plan, and reafimd this during its City Council retas on Janury 21, 20, Janury 27, 203, and Janury 18, 204; and WHERAS, folwing extnsiv civ engamt betwn May 203 and March 204, the Downt Advisory Comite (“DTAC”) endors a prefd stre design as part of the Downt Specif Plan and Strescap Master Plan project during its meting of March 19, 204; and WHERAS, folwing input from the Planig and Transpoti Comisn on May 20, 204, the DTAC’s recomnd stre design was presntd to the City Council on June 10, 204, for its reviw and folwing recipt of public coments; and WHERAS, on June 10, 204, the City Council provide input to staf and adopte Resolutin 204-67 afirmng the stre design for tesing and modeling of trafic and parking outcmes; and WHERAS, on Augst 28, 204, refinmts to stre design and key findgs from trafic and parking studie wer presntd to the downt busine comunity for reviw and input; and WHERAS, on Septmbr 3, 204, refinmts to stre design and key findgs from trafic and parking studie wer presntd to the Downt Advisory Comite, Econmi Devlopmnt Advisory Comisn, Parks Recration and Cultre Comisn, Planig and Transpoti Comisn, and the Youth Advisory Council during an Al-Comisn Special Joint Meting. NOW, THERFO BE IT RESOLVD tha the City Council of the City of San Carlos endors the refind stre design for the Downt Specif Plan and Strescap Master Plan Project. ke K |, City Clerk Crystal Mui, herby certify tha the foregin Resolutin was pased and adopte by the City Council of the City of San Carlos at a schedul meting therof held on the 23" day of Septmbr 204, by the folwing vote: AYES, COUNILMEBRS: COLINS, MCDOWEL, VENKATSH, RAK, DUGAN NOES, COUNILMEBRS: NOE ABSENT, COUNILMEBRS: NOE
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 653
CITY CLERK of the City of San Carlos APROVED: PTB S sag ey MAYOR ‘Of the City of San : Exhibt A: Refind Stre Design - 60 and 80 Laurel Stre - 70 Laurel Stre - 10 and 120 San Carlos Avenu - Aroy Avenu - BritanAvenu - El Camino Real
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 654
Downtown Core Street Design –
Refined Street Designs
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 655
EXISTING CIRCULATION
Proposed Pedestrian Priority Zone with Permanent Closure of 700 Laurel Block
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 656
DRAFT ILLUSTRATIVE STREETSCAPE LAYOUT (The “Downtown Core”) LAUREL STREET 600, 700 & 800 BLOCKS AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE 1100 & 1200 BLOCKS 1100 BLOCK 1200 BLOCK CHERRY ST OLIVE ST
LAUREL ST SAN CARLOS AVE
EL CAMINO REAL
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 657
DRAFT ILLUSTRATIVE STREETSCAPE LAYOUT (South of Arroyo Ave) LAUREL STREET 900, 1000 & 1100 BLOCKS (SoLa District)
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 658
600 BLOCK OF LAUREL STREET
Alternate
Parallel
Parking
Green
Infrastructure
Alternate
Parallel
Parking
Vehicular
Lanes
Curb-less
Design
Class III
Bike Lane CHERRY ST
LAUREL ST SAN CARLOS AVE
Bus Stop
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 659
TREES FOR SHADE MATERIALS TO CREATE PLAZA EXPERIENCE POP-UP MARKET
IN WHEELER PLAZA
EXPANDED OUTDOOR DINING AND PUBLIC SEATING IN WHEELER
PLAZA
MULTI-PURPOSE PROGRAMMING
IN WHEELER PLAZA
SPACE FOR PERFORMANCES IN
WHEELER PLAZA
EXAMPLES OF ACTIVITIES
AS POSSIBLE WAYS TO ACTIVATE THE 600 BLOCK OF LAUREL STREET
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 660
700 BLOCK OF LAUREL STREET - PEDESTRIAN PLAZA
Green
Infrastructure
Curb-less
Design
Emergency
Access
Groves Central Plaza
Harrington Park OLIVE ST
LAUREL ST CHERRY ST
Alley / Parking Area
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 661
OUTDOOR DINING
PUBLIC ART WATER FEATURE PUBLIC SEATING
EVENT PLAZA/ PROGRAMMING STAGE/ PERFORMANCE AREA
EXAMPLES OF ACTIVITIES
AS POSSIBLE WAYS TO ACTIVATE THE 700 BLOCK OF LAUREL STREET
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 662
800 BLOCK OF LAUREL STREET
Alternate
Parallel
Parking
Green
Infrastructure
Alternate
Parallel
Parking
Curb-less
Design
Class III
Bike Lane
Vehicular
Lanes
LAUREL ST OLIVE ST
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 663
FLEXIBLE USE / SPECIAL PAVING
EXAMPLES OF ACTIVITIES
AS POSSIBLE WAYS TO ACTIVATE THE 800 BLOCK OF LAUREL STREET
TREES FOR SHADING
WIDER SIDEWALKS
SIDEWALK DINING
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PUBLIC SEATING
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 664
WHAT WE HEARD SINCE COUNCIL LAST MET
ON JUNE 10, 2024
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 665
San Carlos Ave:
North side condition too
constrained
OK to eliminate median strip, if
additional space is needed
OK to lose parking on the south
side
Concerns about losing lanes
El Camino Real: • Concerns about lose parking
spaces on the west side
COUNCIL FEEDBACK – JUNE 10, 2024
Laurel Street:
600 block – make sure there is
sufficient space for outdoor dining
(frontage plus tree strip)
Curbless configuration on 600 & 800
need moveable barriers for outdoor
dining
Wheeler – flexible use: multi-use
pavilion, change activities with the
season, tables and chairs, pods OK
700 block – Centennial Plaza – pull the
pavilion out a little more
Other Streets:
Arroyo – outdoor dining on the
north side, simplified sidewalks
Britton – resolve merging lanes
to gain space for bike lanes
Define Parking Loss totals
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 666
LAUREL STREET
BLOCK 600 & 800 (Looking North)
EXISTING
(LOOKING NORTH)
PROPOSED
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 667
LAUREL STREET (Festival/ Market Scenario)
BLOCK 600 & 800 (Looking North)
EXISTING
(LOOKING NORTH)
PROPOSED
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 668
LAUREL STREET 700 Block View
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 669
LAUREL STREET
DOWNTOWN CORE AXON
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 670
LAUREL STREET
SoLA AXON
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 671
SAN CARLOS AVENUE
BLOCKS 1100 & 1200
(Looking Towards the Caltrain Station)
EXISTING
(LOOKING EAST)
PROPOSED
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 672
ARROYO AVENUE
(Looking Towards El Camino Real)
PROPOSED
EXISTING
(LOOKING EAST)
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 673
BRITTAN AVENUE
(Looking East)
EXISTING
(LOOKING EAST)
PROPOSED
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 674
EL CAMINO REAL (Looking North)
EXISTING
(LOOKING NORTH
PROPOSED
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 675
RESOLUTIN NO. 204 - 067 A RESOLUTIN OF THE CITY COUNIL OF THE CITY OF SAN CARLOS ENDORSIG THE DOWTN ADVISORY COMITE’S RECOMND STRE DESIGN FOR FURTHE TESING AS PART OF THE DOWNT SPECIF PLAN + STRECAP MASTER PLAN PROJECT. WHERAS, the City Council of the City of San Carlos has made the planig for the futre of its downt one of its top straegic objectivs as set forth withn the City’s adopte 201 Straegic Plan and reafimd this during its City Council Retra on Janury 21, 20, and agin on Janury 27, 203 and Janury 18, 204; and WHERAS, folwing extnsiv civ engamt betwn May 203 throug March 204, the Downt Advisory Comite (DTAC) endors a prefd stre design as part of the Downt Specif Plan + Strescap Master Plan project during its meting on March 19, 204; and WHERAS, folwing input from the Planig and Transpoti Comisn on May 20, 204, the DTAC’s recomnd stre design was presntd to the City Council on June 10, 204, for its reviw and folwing recipt of public coments; and WHERAS, the City Council’s endorsmt of the DTAC’s recomnd stre design does not repsnt a final decison, but rathe, repsnt a firm comiten to proced with the directon of the stre design in its curent configuraton for furthe tesing and modeling. NOW, THERFO BE IT RESOLVD tha the City Council of the City of San Carlos endors the DTAC’s recomnd stre design for furthe tesing and modeling. RKE |, City Clerk Crystal Mui, herby certify tha the foregin Resolutin was pased and adopte by the City Council of the City of San Carlos at a schedul meting therof held on the 10" day of June, 204, by the folwing vote: AYES, COUNILMEBRS: VENKATSH, RAK, MCDOWEL, COLINS, DUGAN NOES, COUNILMEBRS: NOE ABSENT, COUNILMEBRS: NOE CITY CLERK of the City of San Carlos APROVED: c= a 2 C ) — Ss MAYOR of the City of San Carlos Exhibt A: Downt Advisory Comite’s Recomnd Stre Design
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 676
PUBLIC REALM
The “L”
LAUREL STREET
600, 700, 800 BLOCKS
SAN CARLOS AVENUE
1100 AND 1200 BLOCKS
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 677
DRAFT ILLUSTRATIVE STREETSCAPE LAYOUT
LAUREL STREET
600, 700, 800 BLOCKS
SAN CARLOS AVENUE
1100 AND 1200 BLOCKS
EL CAMINO REAL
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 678
600 BLOCK
WHEELER PLAZA CONCEPT
GROVE WITH SEATING
EXPANDED PLAZA
STAGE
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 679
PUBLIC REALM
LAUREL STREET
600 BLOCK
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 680
700 BLOCK
700 BLOCK
HARRINGTON PARK CONCEPT
SHADE AND SEATING
WATER FEATURE
EVENT PLAZA/
PROGRAMMING
OUTDOOR DINING
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 681
PUBLIC REALM
LAUREL STREET
700 BLOCK
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 682
800 BLOCK
800 BLOCK CONCEPT
GROVE
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
SEATING
FLEXIBLE USE/
SPECIAL PAVING
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 683
PUBLIC REALM
LAUREL STREET
800 BLOCK
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 684
EXISTING
(LOOKING NORTH)
LAUREL STREET
600 and 800 BLOCK CROSS-SECTION (LOOKING NORTH)
PROPOSED
(LOOKING NORTH)
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 685
EXISTING
(LOOKING EAST)
SAN CARLOS AVENUE
1100 & 1200 BLOCKS (LOOKING EAST)
PROPOSED
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 686
EXISTING
(LOOKING NORTH)
EL CAMINO REAL
PROPOSED
LOOKING NORTH
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 687
EXISTING
(LOOKING EAST)
ARROYO AVENUE
PROPOSED
LOOKING EAST
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 688
EXISTING
(LOOKING EAST)
BRITTAN AVENUE
PROPOSED
LOOKING EAST
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 689
Attachment 6
Downtown Advisory Committee Meetings –
https://www.sancarlosdowntownplan.com/about-4
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 690
Attachment 7
Community Engagement –
https://www.sancarlosdowntownplan.com/past-community-workshops
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 691
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 692
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 693
1 September 23, 2024 City Council Meeting Notes
9a. NEW BUSINESS
Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Endorsing the Refined Street Designs for the Downtown Specific Plan and Streetscape Master Plan and Direct Staff to Proceed with Preparing the Downtown Specific Plan and Streetscape Master Plan.
DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE
CM Rak inquired about the width of the sidewalk now and the current outdoor dining area width along the sidewalk.
CM Rak inquired if the consulting team looked at making Laurel Street one way.
CM Venkatesh inquired about the project’s timeline and cost. She also asked whether starting implementation at Harrington Park could potentially accelerate the overall timeline.
CM Collins inquired if the EV Charging stations would be on the 600 and 800 blocks of Laurel Street. He also expressed support for the proposal to remove the median strip on San Carlos Avenue, noting it could create more opportunities to reconfigure the street and achieve shared goals.
CM Collins wanted clarification on the reconfiguration of Brittan Ave going towards El Camino.
Mayor Dugan inquired about the City’s authority and the process involved in implementing a road diet on a state route (El Camino).
CM Rak requested clarification regarding traffic study on the first block of Holly Street west of El Camino Real and along El Camino itself. He expressed concern that the proposed changes might negatively affect traffic flow on El Camino, noting that San Carlos is currently the only section where traffic moves smoothly, while both Belmont and Redwood City experience significant congestion.
VM McDowell referenced slide 28, showing the Laurel Street 700 block view. She praised the consulting team for thoughtfully bringing together the various ideas from the commission and expressed appreciation for the pedestrian perspective presented in the rendering.
VM McDowell inquired if the street is wide enough for the Hometown Day parade.
VM McDowell referred to slide 27, the Centennial Plaza View and inquired if there would be a play structure in Harrington Park. She then referred to slide 29, the Wheeler Plaza View
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 694
2 rendering. VM McDowell shared that she received feedback from the public that they do not like containers like popups. She also emphasized the importance of keeping the space flexible to allow for seasonal activities. She noted that pop-ups and large trees could reduce the usable area.
VM McDowell referred to slide 26. She inquired if the south of Laurel Street (S. of Arroyo) outdoor dining space will be similar to the 600 and 800 block.
Mayor Dugan asked if the width of the 900 block Laurel Street stays the same.
CM Venkatesh referred to the Wheeler Plaza View slide. She inquired if there is space for a seasonal activity area for children/teens.
CM Rak shared that he prefers a more permanent food structure in the Wheeler Plaza area.
He expressed that he does not favor food trucks, as they do not align with the aesthetic the City is aiming to achieve.
Mayor Dugan referred to slide 34, Brittan Ave. He expressed his concern for the 10-foot lane as he heard Sam Trans requires at least 11 feet to run a bus down Brittan Ave. CM Rak stated the did not want to give Sam Trans a reason not to have a Bus running down Brittan Ave.
Mayor Dugan referred to slide 27, the 700 Block Centennial Plaza, and expressed his appreciation for the rendering.
TRAFFIC
CM Collins expressed concern about traffic on San Carlos Avenue, noting it is a major route for reaching El Camino and Holly Street. He asked if there is a plan to test the proposed changes in real time—such as using temporary lane markings—because he finds it hard to envision reducing the road from four lanes to two while maintaining smooth traffic flow.
CM Collins suggested conducting a 7-day, 24/7 trial to measure the full impact of proposed street changes (road diet) over time. He noted that such a period might also reveal shifts in people’s travel habits.
CM Venkatesh inquired whether traffic in the alleys is being considered.
CM Rak shared that he is grappling with the idea of installing buffered bike lanes on Brittan Avenue. He noted that while it may work in wider sections of Brittan further east, it doesn’t make sense on narrow roads like Holly Street, where bikes will likely need to share lanes with cars. He emphasized a desire to support biking but suggested a more balanced approach— focusing buffered bike lanes on streets like Arroyo, Old County, and potentially East San Carlos Avenue—to create a cohesive network without placing them everywhere.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 695
3 CM Rak emphasized the importance of creating a connected and safe bike network without relying heavily on El Camino or Brittan. He pointed out that Arroyo and East San Carlos Avenue offer good east-west bike connections. He highlighted Old County Road as a preferable route due to existing plans for buffered bike lanes and the Arroyo underpass.
CM Rak expressed concern over biking along Brittan and Old County near Laurel due to traffic complexity, and ultimately supported bike lanes on San Carlos Avenue to improve access to the Caltrain station.
PARKING
CM Rak inquired about the breakdown of empty parking spaces in Wheeler Plaza, specifically between employee versus public parking.
CM Rak inquired whether AB 2097 applies solely to housing or if it also includes commercial developments.
CM Rak expressed support for the ongoing study on potential regulatory changes. He noted frustration with the current situation at the top level of Wheeler Plaza, where employee parking is often available, yet some employees move their cars around to avoid enforcement.
He suggested that extending enforcement hours or implementing zone-based parking could help change these behaviors. He added that addressing this issue would make the reduction of 47 parking spaces feel like nothing, as employees would be parking in designated areas.
Vice Mayor McDowell inquired whether the study examined the utilization of ADA parking spaces.
Mayor Dugan inquired about the pick-up/drop-off spaces on Cherry and Olive and asked whether they were included in the count for the 47-space parking reduction. He also wanted to know if the City could channel the reduction of parking spaces on Cherry and Olive. Mayor Dugan inquired if the alleys could accommodate the loading zone.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Sonia Elks (In-person)- 20-year San Carlos resident, expressed strong support for prioritizing pedestrian and bicycle safety in the Downtown Plan, noting it encourages more walking and reduces community stress. She suggested considering shared bike and pedestrian space on Britain Avenue instead of buffered bike lanes. She also mentioned avoiding Wheeler Plaza due to small parking spaces. Lastly, she brought up the idea of a one-way circulation loop around Laurel Street to improve traffic flow.
Mark Fagle (In-person) voiced concern about traffic impacts from proposed bike lane expansions, especially for commuters traveling from the north and west parts of San Carlos
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 696
4 to Highway 101. He shared his skepticism that the lane reduction would only add minimal delay and emphasized that traffic is already challenging during peak hours. While supportive of bike access, he questioned the need for multiple major bike corridors and preferred focusing on a central route like Arroyo to avoid worsening congestion.
Sarah Kelsy (Zoom) noted an issue with drivers making U-turns on Laurel Street to park on the wrong side, which creates a potential traffic hazard. Secondly, she expressed worry about cyclist safety on northbound El Camino at intersections like Britain and Holly, where right-hand turns are common. She suggested that protected bike lanes could improve safety but emphasized the need for careful traffic engineering solutions.
COUNCIL WRAP UP COMMENTS
CM Rak echoed Sarah Kelsy’s comment.
VM McDowell shared insights into how other City Councils are approaching their downtown planning. She highlighted concerns from some senior residents about the dangers e-bikes pose to pedestrians. She requested that a community service officer be stationed downtown on Wednesday afternoons to encourage children to dismount and walk their bikes through the closed block.
Mayor Dugan noted that in the downtown survey almost 70%-75% showed support for the proposed downtown elements. He called that a win.
11.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 697
CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 28, 2025
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Authorizing Adjustments to the Cost of Services Schedule (User Fees), Park Facility Development Fee, Sewer Capacity Charge, Childcare Development Impact Fee and Traffic Impact Fee for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and Adding Three New Fees to the User Fee Schedule.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend that the City Council approve a Resolution authorizing adjustments to the City of San Carlos Cost of Services Schedule (“User Fees”) and certain impact fees for fiscal year (FY) 2025-26, and adding three new fees to the User Fee Schedule.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
If adopted, these User Fees and impact fees will result in a net revenue increase of approximately $236,103 across all City Funds (excluding Fire fees) based on estimated activity determined during a fee study in 2022. The study completed in 2022 did not include Fire fees as these are tied directly to the Redwood City Fire Department.
The table below shows how this estimated revenue increase would be split between the departments and funds for the User Fees, as well as the split between the four impact fees. The new fees would be effective July 1, 2025, as a minimum 60-day notice is required for new development fees in accordance with California Government Code Section 66017. These fees have been incorporated into the proposed FY 2025-26 budget.
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 698
*Note - excludes Fire as fees were not part of 2022 user fee study.
BACKGROUND:
All fee changes must be approved by the City Council. The proposed changes are coming before the City Council for consideration this evening.
Existing User Fee Schedule
Every spring, staff review the costs of providing fee-related services. The proposed fee schedule was derived from a comprehensive fee study performed by NBS Municipal Advisors (“NBS”) in June 2022. The study includes a full analysis of the total cost of providing services, including all applicable direct, indirect, and overhead costs associated with individual services. Such a study is usually only performed every three to five years.
As indicated in Resolution 2022-079 approved on June 27, 2022, the City Council chose to use the San Francisco – Oakland – San Jose (Bay Area) Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Consumer Price Index (CPI-W) as a guideline for future annual increases. Staff recommends increasing the User Fees (except those detailed in the Analysis section) by 2.7% CPI-W using the February 2025 index in accordance with prior practice for the FY 2025-26 fees. The User Fee Schedule is included as Exhibit A to the Resolution.
User Fees Additional Revenue split by Fund
Department /
Division
Estimated
Annual
Current Fee
Revenue
Estimated
Annual
Recommend
ed Fee
Revenue
Additional
revenue
General
Fund
Wastewater
Fund
Capital
Fund
Park-inLieu
Fund
Child
Care
Fund
TOTAL
Administrative Fees $ 325 $ 325 $ - $ - $ -
Planning $ 1,435,828 $ 1,474,578 $ 38,750 $ 38,750 $ 38,750 Public Works
Engineering
$ 869,435 $ 893,049 $ 23,614 $ 22,910 $ 704 $ 23,614
Building $ 6,471,880 $ 6,623,399 $ 151,519 $ 151,519 $ 151,519 Police $ 137,505 $ 141,240 $ 3,735 $ 3,735 $ 3,735
Recreation
(permits/processing)
$ 122,364 $ 128,932 $ 6,568 $ 6,568 $ 6,568
Total $ 9,037,337 $ 9,261,523 $ 224,186 $ 223,482 $ - $ 704 $ - $ 224,186 Impact Fees
Park Facility Development Fee
$ - $ - $ -
Sewer Capacity Charge
$ 11,917 $ 11,917 $ 11,917
Traffic Impact Fee
$ - $ - $ -
Child Care Development Impact Fee
$ - $ - $ -
Total $ 11,917 $ - $ 11,917 $ - $ - $ - $ 11,917
GRAND TOTAL $ 236,103 $ 223,482 $ 11,917 $ 704 $ - $ - $ 236,103
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 699
Impact Fees
In accordance with the Municipal Code, four impact fees are also adjusted on an annual basis by applying the appropriate indices. These fees are described below and a summary of the changes are shown in Exhibit B to the Resolution.
1) Park Facility Development Fee. “The fee shall be increased annually by the percentage increase of park construction costs cited in the Engineering News Record, for the San Francisco Bay Area.” The 2025 Index, which is used for FY 2025-26, is showing a 1.42% decrease from the previous year. Staff recommend keeping the current rate. 2) Sewer Capacity Charge. “The sewer capacity charge shall be adjusted annually based on the change in the Engineering News Record – Construction Cost Index (20-Cities Average) from the March 2016 Index.” For FY 2025-26, this would result in an increase of 1.85%, based on a 12-month comparison.
3) Traffic Impact Fee. “The amount of the Traffic Impact Fee shall be adjusted annually based on the Construction Cost Index published by the Engineering News Record” as approved under Ordinance #1562. For FY 2025-26, this would result in a decrease of
1.42% following the 2025 Construction Cost Index. Staff recommend keeping the same rate as the previous year.
4) Childcare Development Impact Fee. “The amount of proposed fee shall be established by the City Council resolution and not exceed the fee established by the adopted Impact Fee Nexus Study dated July 14,2021 or subsequent nexus studies which shall be adjusted annually based on the Construction Cost Index published by the Engineering News Record or a reasonable replacement index” as approved under Ordinance #1585. For FY 2025-26, this would result in a decrease of 1.42% following the 2025 Construction Cost Index. Staff recommend keeping the same rate as the previous year.
ANALYSIS:
Exceptions to CPI increases, Adjustments and New Fee Requests As noted previously and based on prior practice, staff recommends increasing the User Fees (except those noted below) for the FY 2025-26 by 2.7% CPI-W using the February index in accordance with prior practice. After seeking input from each department, the following exceptions to an increase and adjustments were received and have been incorporated into the proposed FY 2025-26 Schedule of Fees:
Fire Department
Fire prevention fees were separate from the Fee Study’s scope of review, since these services are contracted from the City of Redwood City. As done in prior years, staff recommend adopting user fees based on the Redwood City User Fee Schedule upon its effective date, as applicable.
Parks and Recreation
Janitorial Services – Staff do not recommend an increase in this fee. This fee is a passthrough cost recovery for the service. The current and recommended fee is $220 per event or actual cost.
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 700
Security Guard Fee – Private Rentals Serving Alcohol – Staff do not recommend an increase to this fee. This fee is a pass-through cost recovery for the service. The current and recommended fee is $67 per event or actual cost.
Corn Hole Game Area, Chestnut Picnic Site – Staff do not recommend an increase in this fee to keep it comparable to other jurisdictions. This fee is an add-on to a picnic rental permit.
Facility Rental Application Fee - Staff do not recommend an increase in this fee. This is a fee to ensure that the applicant for any application submitted is genuine in their intent. The current and recommended fee is $25 per rental application.
Light Use (Fields) – Staff do not recommend an increase to this fee. This fee is a passthrough cost recovery for the service. The current and recommended fee is $32 per hour.
Sports League Field Use Fee – Staff do not recommend an increase to this fee. This fee increased over 50% in the last two years and is high compared to other communities.
Special Event Permit Request Fees – Staff do not recommend an increase to this permit fee and proposes keeping the fee the same so that it does not become cost prohibitive for community organizations to host special events. The current and recommended fee is $400 for a new event application and $375 for a repeat event application.
Sports Tournament Permit Request Fees – Staff do not recommend an increase to this permit fee and is proposing to keep the fee the same so that it does not become cost prohibitive for community organizations to hold sporting events. The current and recommended fee is $350 for a new event application and $300 for a repeat event application.
Community Development
Protected Tree Fees – These are fees that are observed by staff annually instead of being increased by a CPI. An increase is not recommended for FY 2025-26. The categories are listed below, which represent 100% of the staff’s time to complete.
Dead Tree - $100 Per Project
Risk or Health Rating – $500 Per Project
Species – $500 Per Project
Development – $500 + Planning Division Staff Hourly Rate Utility Interference – $500 Per Project
Arborist Fee – $200 Per Hour
Emergency Removals – No Charge
Protected Tree Notice – $150 Each
Tree Protection Plan Review (Depending on complexity of application, additional arborist fees may be incurred at an hourly rate.) – $750 Per Project (5 or fewer trees) and $1,250 per Project (6 or more trees)
Beekeeping Fee – This fee was introduced for FY 2024-25. Staff does not recommend an increase for FY 2025-26. The current fee is $150 and will cover approximately 50% of staff’s time. The City Council also approved a $100 reduction in the permit fee if the applicant provides proof that they have taken a beekeeping class.
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 701
Compliance Review – Single Family – Staff recommend an update in terminology for this fee which was previously referred to as Design Review – Single Family. Design Review refers to discretionary review (Planning Commission or Director's Review), while Compliance Review focuses solely on evaluations based on objective design standards. Following the adoption of the single-family objective design standards on December 13, 2023, the Residential Design Review Committee (RDRC) was discontinued, and the terminology needs to be updated to reflect the new process.
The Objective Design Standards (ODS) Project is divided into two phases. Phase 1 (also called “SF ODS”), which has been completed and adopted in 2023, focused on creating objective design standards for single-family zoning districts. Phase 2, currently underway, is developing objective design standards for multi-family and mixed-use zoning districts (also called “RM/MU ODS”).
Design Review - Deviation from Objective Design Standards (Planning and Transportation Commission) – This is a new proposed fee starting in FY 2025-26, relevant to the adoption of the objective design standards for single family in 2023. Deviation from ODS fees only applies to single-family projects if they request a deviation from the ODS, making them ineligible for the previously mentioned staff-level Compliance Review. In these cases, applicants must submit a deviation request from the ODS, which will be reviewed based on design review criteria by the Planning and Transportation Commission.
The deviation process follows a similar procedure to that of a use permit (Development Standards). This means the deviation request will be reviewed in the same way as a use permit, based on design review findings. Additionally, the Planning and Transportation Commission hearing regarding such requests will be a public hearing, similar to use permits, requiring comparable staff time for preparing notices, staff reports, and attending the meeting.
Therefore, the fees associated with the use permit process are comparable due to the staff time and the process involved. Staff recommend setting the fee the same as the use permit fee at $3,985 and to increase it annually by CPI.
Minor Deviation from Objective Design Standards – This is a new proposed fee starting in FY 2025-26 under the Design Review (MR, M/U, Comm, IND) - Staff Review / Approval. As part of the ongoing Multi-family (MR) Mixed-use (MU) Objective Design Standards (“MR/MU ODS”) Project, which is expected to be adopted by summer 2025, a new review process called "minor deviation from objective standards" will be introduced. This process will allow multifamily/mixed-use project applicants to request deviations from the required objective design standards, in which case a review by the Director will be required. The review will be based on the findings of the Design Review conducted by the Director. Currently, there is a process called Director's Waivers (SCMC 18.33), where applicants can request waivers from certain development standards up to 10%. Staff review these requests based on the criteria outlined in SCMC Section 18.33, and the Director makes a final decision. Under the new multi-family and mixed-use objective design standards, minor deviations will follow a similar process to the waiver, and as a result, the associated fees will reflect the comparable staff time spent.
The Director’s Waiver fee is currently set at $1,328 for FY 2025-26 and staff recommend setting this new fee at this rate, to be increased by CPI annually.
Major Deviation from Objective Design Standards – This is a new proposed fee starting in FY 2025-26 under the Design Review (MR, M/U, Comm, IND) - Planning and Transportation Commission Review / Approval. As part of the MR/MU ODS Project, which is expected to be adopted by summer 2025, a new process called "major deviation from objective standards"
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 702
will be introduced. This process allows larger multi-family and mixed-use projects to request substantial deviations from the objective standards, unlike minor deviations. The review will be based on the findings of the Design Review conducted by the Planning and Transportation Commission and will follow a review process similar to a Conditional Use Permit – Planning Commission application, including notice, staff report, and a public hearing. As a result, the fee for this process will be comparable to that for the above use permit type. Staff recommend setting the fee the same as the Conditional Use Permits – Planning Commission fee which is $9,963 and to increase it annually by CPI.
Police Services
Staff conducted a comparison of fees with the other contract substation bureaus as well as the headquarters and recommend increases to the following fees to maintain alignment with prevailing charges for similar services.
Accident Report – $10 per report. This is a document created by law enforcement after responding to a motor vehicle accident.
Crime Report – $10 per report. This is a document prepared by law enforcement when a crime is reported or discovered.
Visa/Police Clearance Request Form – $40 per report. This is an official document issued by a police department or city agency confirming whether an individual has any criminal record within that jurisdiction. This was a new fee introduced for FY 2024-25.
Impact Fees
As noted above, it is also recommended that the Sewer Capacity Charge be increased using the appropriate indices in accordance with the Municipal Code (see Exhibit B to the Resolution).
ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Adopt a Resolution authorizing adjustments to the City of San Carlos Cost of Services Schedule (User Fees) and certain Impact Fees for FY 2025-26, and adding three new fees to the User Fee Schedule; or
2. Do not adopt the Resolution; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted by:
Rebecca Mendenhall, Administrative Services Director
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 703
Approved for submission by:
_______________________
Jeff Maltbie, City Manager
ATTACHMENT(S):
1. Resolution
Exhibit A to Resolution - Proposed User Fee Schedule FY 2025-26 Exhibit B to Resolution - Impact Fees FY 2025-26
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 704
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 – ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN CARLOS
AUTHORIZING ADJUSTMENTS TO THE COST OF SERVICES SCHEDULE (USER FEES),
PARK FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FEE, SEWER CAPACITY CHARGE, CHILDCARE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE AND TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26, AND ADDING THREE NEW FEES TO THE USER FEE SCHEDULE.
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 2017-050, establishing certain fees for City services, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 2018-052, authorizing index-linked adjustments to the cost of services schedule, Park Facility Development, and Sewer Capacity Charge impact fees for fiscal year (FY) 2018-19, and granted authority to the City Manager to waive user fees for non-profit agencies at his/her discretion, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 2019-026, authorizing index-linked adjustments to the cost of services schedule, Park Facility Development, and Sewer Capacity Charge impact fees for FY 2019-20, and establishment of a cost of service fee for industrial and commercial inspections for compliance with provision C.4 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-027, authorizing index-linked adjustments to the cost of services schedule, Park Facility Development, and Sewer Capacity Charge impact fees for FY 2020-21, and incorporating the cost of service fee for a Sidewalk Vendor Permit Program into the cost of services (user fee) master schedule subjecting it to future index-lined adjustments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1560, adding Chapter 15.60 – Construction Time Limits, to Title 15 of the San Carlos Municipal Code for construction time limits and penalties; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1562, amending Chapter 8.50 – Traffic Impact Fee to Title 8 of the San Carlos Municipal Code and allowing the annual adjustment based on the Construction Cost Index published by the Engineering News Record; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1585, adding Chapter 8.52 – Child Care Development Impact Fees to Title 8 of the San Carlos Municipal Code and allowing the annual adjustment based on the Construction Cost Index published by the Engineering News Record; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to revise said fee schedule at this time; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to use the San Francisco - Oakland - San Jose (Bay Area) Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Consumer Price Index (CPI-W) as a guideline for future annual increases for user fees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to use the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Indices for future increases to the Park Facility Development, Childcare Development and Traffic Impact fees; and
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 705
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to use the Construction Cost Index (20-cities average) for future increases to the Sewer Capacity Charge; and WHEREAS, for Fire Department Fees, fire prevention fees were separate from the Fee Study’s scope of review since these services are contracted from the City of Redwood City. As done in prior years, the City Council wishes to adopt the fire user fees based on the Redwood City User Fee Schedule upon its effective date, as applicable; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to add a Design Review - Deviation from Objective Design Standards (Planning and Transportation Commission) fee to the User Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to add a Minor Deviation from Objective Design Standards fee to the User Fee Schedule; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to add a Major Deviation from Objective Design Standards fee to the User Fee Schedule.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Carlos hereby approves the amended User Fees (Exhibit A) and the amended Impact Fees (Exhibit B), effective July 1, 2025.
* * * * *
I, City Clerk Crystal Mui, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Carlos at a scheduled meeting thereof held on the 28th day of April 2025, by the following vote:
AYES, COUNCILMEMBERS: _______________________________________________ NOES, COUNCILMEMBERS: _______________________________________________ ABSENT, COUNCILMEMBERS: _______________________________________________ ________________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of San Carlos
APPROVED:
___________________________
MAYOR of the City of San Carlos
EXHIBITS:
A. Cost of Services Schedule (User Fees)
B. Impact Fees
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 706
City of San Carlos
Proposed
User Fee Schedule - FY2025-26
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 707
FEE SCHEDULE PAGE
Schedule of Administrative Fees 3
Schedule of Community Development Department, Planning Division Fees 4 Schedule of Public Works Department Fees 9
Schedule of Community Development Department, Building Division Fees 13 Schedule of Police Department Fees 19
Schedule of Parks and Recreation Department Fees 21
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Table of Contents
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 708
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Administrative Services Fees
(Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Returned Check and eCheck [1]
First Item Per First Check $ 25
Each Additional Item Per Subsequent
Check $ 35
Credit Card and eCheck Charges Each Transaction Actual Cost Copy Charges: Per Page $.10/page
Copy Charges - CD Per CD $0.50/CD
Copies of City Subdivision Ordinances, Zoning Ordinances, Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Municipal Code Book, Standard Bid Specifications, Standard Detail, Work Program Free/website, or
Copy Charge
Document Certification Per Request Fee Waived
Agenda or Minutes Subscription Free/website, or
Copy Charge
Research Per Hour, or
Fraction Thereof $ 214
Wheeler Plaza Electrical Vehicle Charging Fee Per kWh $0.25/kWh For services requested of City Staff for which no fee is listed in this Master Fee Schedule, the City Manager or Department Director shall determine the appropriate fee based on the following hourly rates for staff time:
Finance Division Staff (Per Hour) Per Hour 214 $
City Clerk Department Staff (Per Hour) Per Hour 214 $
[Notes]
[1] Fee set by California Civil Code Ch. 522 Section 1719. Additional charges may apply if not paid within 30 days of receipt of written demand for payment letter
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Service Fee Unit / Type Notes
3 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 709
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Planning Division Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Appeal, Planning and Transportation Commission Per Appeal $ 2,217 Appeal, City Council Per Appeal $ 2,217
Attorney's Fees
Support to Planning projects that require Deposit Per Project Actual cost / + $2,500 minimum deposit
Support to Projects on a "Fixed"/"Flat" Fee Basis Per Project Actual Cost - 2 Hours Minimum
Below Market Rate (BMR), Housing Plan Per Project $ 2,325 Below Market Rate (BMR), Builder Alternative Per Project $ 2,325 Below Market Rate (BMR), Housing Agreement Per Project $ 2,989 CEQA
Document Filing Per Project $ 333
Categorical Exemption
City Processing Fee Per Project $ 664
Department of Fish and Game / County Recording Fees Per Project Actual Cost of DFG / County Fees
Initial Study/Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative/EIR City Processing Fee Per Project Actual Cost with
$3,000 deposit
Consultant Review Per Project Actual Cost with
$5,000 deposit
Mitigation Monitoring Per Project Actual Cost with
$1,000 deposit
Cell Tower Application [3]
6409 Application Each $ 1,328
Other Applications Each Actual Cost / T&M
Creek Exception/Stream Overlay District Review
City Processing Fee Per Project $ 4,981
Consultant Review Per Project Actual Cost of
Consultant Study
Service Fee Unit / Type
Notes
Proposed Fee /
Deposit
4 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 710
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Planning Division Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Service Fee Unit / Type
Notes
Proposed Fee /
Deposit
Compliance Review - Single Family
Single Family, New Home/Notification Per Project $ 11,623 Single Family, First Floor Addition/Notification Per Project $ 8,302 Single Family, Second Floor Addition/Notification Per Project $ 11,623 Single Family, First Floor Addition (Staff) Per Project $ 3,321 Single Family, Second Floor Addition (Staff) Per Project $ 4,981 Design Review - Deviation from Objective Design Standards (Planning and Transportation Commission) Per Project [8] $ 3,985 Design Review (MR, M/U, Comm, IND) - Staff Review /
Approval
New Building Per Project $ 19,925
Major Alteration Per Project $ 13,948
Minor Alteration Per Project $ 10,627
Minor Deviation from Objective Design Standards Per Project $ 1,328 Design Review (MR, M/U, Comm, IND) - Planning and
Transporation Commission Review / Approval
New Building (Planning and Transportation Commission) Per Project $ 23,578 Major Alteration (Planning and Transportation Commission) Per Project $ 17,601 Minor Alteration (Planning and Transportation Commission) Per Project $ 14,279 Major Deviation from Objective Design Standards Per Project [8] $ 9,963 Design Review (Other)
A - Frames Per Project $ 166
Accessory Structures (Includes large decks) Per Project $ 1,992 Architectural Peer Review Per Project $3,000 Initial Deposit Mills Acts Designated Projects
City Processing Fee Per Project $ 1,992
Historic Consultant Review Per Project [4] $5,000 Initial Deposit Miscellaneous (awnings, trash, replacement materials, site plan review, landscape) Per Project $ 664
Outdoor Uses Dining & Retail Sales Per Project $ 1,992
Sign Program Per Project $ 6,641
Signs - (Planning Commission) Per Project $ 4,981
Signs (Staff) Per Project $ 1,328
Temporary Banner Per Project $ 333
Minor Alterations Per Project $ 1,328
5 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 711
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Planning Division Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Service Fee Unit / Type
Notes
Proposed Fee /
Deposit
Document Imaging Per 1/2 Hour - 1/2
Hour Minimum $ 166
Domestic Fowl and Non-Household Pets Per Project $ 1,992 Excessive Noise Compliance Permit Per Project $ 664
Final Inspection, Single-Family Per Project $ 664
Final Inspection, Other Per Project $ 1,328
General Plan Amendment Per Project $ 13,284
Grading and Dirt Haul Certificate Per Project $ 3,321
Historic Preservation
City Processing Fee Per Project $ 664
Historic Assessment - Consultant Review Per Project Actual Cost with $2,000 deposit
Mills Act Contract Per Project $ 4,981
Interdepartmental Plan Review
Building Per Project
See Building Fee
Schedule for Per
Review Charge
Engineering Per Project
See Engineering Fee
Schedule and / or
Hourly Rates Apply
Fire Per Project See Fire Fee Schedule
Police Per Project
See Police Fee
Schedule and/or
Hourly Rates Apply
Economic Development - Housing Per Project Planning Hourly Rate Applies
Other City Commission Review Per Project $ 1,328
6 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 712
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Planning Division Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Service Fee Unit / Type
Notes
Proposed Fee /
Deposit
Plan Check for Building Permits
Major (New Multi-Family, Mixed-Use, Commercial, Industrial) Per Project $ 3,985 Moderate (New Single-Family, Commercial
additions/alterations) Per Project $ 1,661
Minor (Single-Family Additions, Accessory Dwelling Units) Per Project $ 997 Accessory Dwelling Units (Not a Part of The Previous
Approval) Per Project $ 997
Pre-Application Development Review
General/Initial Questions Per Project No Charge
Major Per Project [2] $ 9,963
Minor Per Project [1] $ 6,641
Protected Tree Fees
Protected Tree Removal Permit / Pruning Permit: Below flat fees are based on requested reason for removal. Depending on complexity of application, additional arborist fees may be incurred at an hourly rate.
Dead Tree Per Project $ 100
Risk or Health Rating Per Project $ 500
Species Per Project $ 500
Development Per Project
$500 + Planning
Division Staff Hourly
Rate
Utility Interference Per Project $ 500
Arborist Fee Per Hour $ 200
Investigative Report Each $500 Initial Deposit
Illegal Tree Removal (additional arborist report fees apply) Penalty Double the
Application Fee, plus
assessed penalties per
Muni Code
Protected Tree Notice Each $ 150
Tree Replanting Fee Per Tree [7]
See Public Works Fee
Schedule
Emergency Removals Per Tree No Charge
Tree Protection Plan Review (Depending on complexity of application, additional arborist fees may be incurred at an hourly rate.)
Per Project $750 (5 or fewer
trees)
$1,250 (6 or more
trees)
Beekeeping Fee Per Project [10] $ 150
7 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 713
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Planning Division Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Service Fee Unit / Type
Notes
Proposed Fee /
Deposit
Public Notice Fee
City Processing Fee Per Hearing $ 664
Restrictive Covenants Each $ 664
San Mateo County Recording Fees
City Processing Fee Each $ 664
County Fee Each Per County fee
schedule
Subdivisions
Subdivision, Major (5 or more lots) Per Project $ 26,567 Subdivision, Minor (up to 4 lots) or for Condominium Maps Per Project $ 3,985 Lot Line Adjustment, Parcel Mergers Per Project $ 1,328 Conditional Exceptions Per Project $ 6,641
Lot Verification Per Project [5] $ 664
Map Extension Per Project $ 1,328
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan
City Staff Review Per Project $ 4,649
Consultant Review Per Project $700 Initial Deposit
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Review
Annual Each $500 Initial Deposit
5-Year Each $500 Initial Deposit
Consultant Review Deposit / Actual
Cost $700 Initial Deposit
Use Permits
Conditional Use Permit- Planning Commission Per Project [8] $ 9,963 Minor Use Permit - Zoning Administrator Per Project [8] $ 4,981 Use Permits (Development Standards) Per Project [8] $ 3,985 Temporary Per Project [8] $ 2,657
Amendment Per Project [8] $ 3,985
Variance Per Project $ 13,284
Waivers Per Project $ 1,328
Zoning Administrator Determination Per Project $ 2,657
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Major Rezone/PD/Map and Text Per Project $ 26,567
Moderate Rezone/PD/Map and Text Per Project $ 13,284
Minor Rezone/PD/Map and Text Per Project $ 6,641
Minor staff review
ABC/DMV Zoning Affidavit Review Per Project $ 664
Business Registration Per Project $ 112
Home Occupations Per Project $ 112
Home Occupation Revocation Hearing Per Project $ 2,657
Massage Per Project $ 997
8 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 714
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Planning Division Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Service Fee Unit / Type
Notes
Proposed Fee /
Deposit
Other Zoning Affidavit Review Per Project $ 1,328
Parking Calculation Per Project $ 997
Search and Determination Per Project [6] $ 664
Code Compliance Per Project $ 1,328
Technology Fee Per Permit 0.4% of Total
Permit Fee Amount
General Plan Maintenance and Update - Staff Support Per Project [9]
0.65% of Building
Project Valuation
for all New
Construction and
Additions; Fee is
Applied on Building
Permit
General Plan Maintenance and Update - Contract Services Per Project [9]
0.09% of Building
Project Valuation
for all New
Construction and
Additions; Fee is
Applied on Building
Permit
Credit Card and eCheck Charges Each Transaction Actual Cost SB-9 Application
No Lot Split Each $ 11,623
Lot Split Each $ 11,623
For services requested of City Staff for which no fee/deposit is listed in this Master Fee Schedule, the City Manager or Department Director shall determine the appropriate
fee/deposit based on the following hourly rates for staff time involved in the service.
Planning Division Staff Per Hour $ 333
[Notes]
[10] $100 reduction in the permit fee if they provide proof that they have taken a beekeeping class [9] Total General Plan Surcharge fee capped at $370,000 for building project valuations of more than $50 million [6] Not charged for public records requests
[1} Includes up to 2, 1-hour meetings with multiple departments [2] Other City department fees/deposits may apply
[3] Governed by FCC, section 6409
[4] Fees for historical consultants apply
[5] Public Works fees apply
[7] Per the City's Tree Ordinance, the arborist may request a fee in lieu of tree replanting if there is no possibility to plant on site [8] Existing required fees are waived if a Child Care Center is the applicant 9 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 715
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Public Works Department Fees
(Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Final Map Review
(Includes up to 3 Reviews)
Parcel (4 lots or less)
City Processing Fee Per Project 2,646 $
Consultant Review Per Project Deposit / Actual
Cost
Subdivision (5 or more lots)
City Processing Fee Per Project 3,070 $
Consultant Review Per Project Deposit / Actual
Cost
4th and Subsequent Review
City Processing Fee Per Submittal 317 $
Consultant Review Per Submittal Deposit / Actual
Cost
Civil Plan Check [1]
(Includes up to 3 Reviews)
Minor Projects
City Processing Fee Per Project 2,117 $
Consultant Review Per Project Deposit / Actual
Cost
Moderate Projects
City Processing Fee Per Project 4,128 $
Consultant Review Per Project Deposit / Actual
Cost
Major Projects
City Processing Fee Per Project 6,034 $
Consultant Review Per Project Deposit / Actual
Cost
4th and Subsequent Review
City Processing Fee Per Submittal 529 $
Consultant Review Per Submittal Deposit / Actual
Cost
Utility Companies Plan Check: [2]
Minor Each 212 $
Moderate Each 423 $
Major Deposit / Actual
Cost $ 741
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Service Notes
Fee Unit / Type
10 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 716
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Public Works Department Fees
(Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Service Notes
Fee Unit / Type
Construction Inspection (Including Utilities) [3]
Minor Projects (1-3 inspections) Per Project 477 $
Moderate Projects (4-5 inspections) Per Project 794 $
Major Projects (6-10 inspections) Deposit / Actual
Cost
Deposit / Actual
Cost
Additional Inspection Each 159 $
Post Construction Stormwater Device Monitoring Per Device, Every 5 Years $ 423
Dirt Hauling Per CY 2.33 $
Planning & Building Dept. Plan Check:
Planning Referral
City Processing Fee Per Project 1,059 $
Consultant Review Per Project Deposit / Actual
Cost
Building Referral, Review of On-site Civil Per Project 423 $ Debris Box/Storage Container Permit
Duration up to two weeks Per Permit 95 $
Monthly Per Permit 317 $
Encroachment Permit Administrative Fee Per Permit 105 $ Outside Sewer Agreement Fee Deposit / Actual
Cost Deposit $5,000
Community Banner (Hang & Remove):
for-profit organization Each 212 $
non-profit organization Each No Charge
Wide Load Processing Each [5] 16 $
Sidewalk Dining or Outdoor Display Approval
Initial Each Initial Review 317 $
Annual Each Annual
Review $ 317
11 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 717
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Public Works Department Fees
(Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Service Notes
Fee Unit / Type
Temporary NO PARKING Signs Per Sign 1 $
Semi-Annual Permit Parking in City Lots
Downtown Employee Parking Program Per Six Month
Permit $ 105
East San Carlos Parking Permit Program-Residential Part of the Program Each No Charge
East San Carlos Parking Permit Program-Business part of the Program
Per Six Month
Permit $ 39
Exception to the Winter Moratorium on Grading Per Week-long Request $ 105
"Street Cut" fee per Ordinance Section 12.08.310.C.2 Per Opening 665 $ Video Review of Existing Sewer Lateral Each 159 $
Starting Work Without a Permit Per Permit Actual Cost
Grading Bond Policy (per 12.08.100)
<1,000 CY Per City Policy
Valuation of
Improvements +
20% Contingency
>1,000 CY Per City Policy
Valuation of
Improvements +
20% Contingency,
plus Performance
Bond
Industrial / Commercial Business Stormwater C.4 Inspection Fee
Per Hour -
Minimum 1.5
Hours
$ 212
Technology Fee Per Permit
0.4% of Total
Permit Fee
Amount
Credit Card and eCheck Charges Each Transaction Actual Cost 12 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 718
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Public Works Department Fees
(Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Service Notes
Fee Unit / Type
Parklet Program
Encroachment Permit Administrative Fee Per Permit 105 $ Encroachment Permit - Downtown Area Per Permit / Per 6
Months $ 1,034
Encroachment Permit - Other Areas (Industrial Arts, etc.) Per Permit / Per 6 Months $ 1,034
Cleaning Fee Per Linear Foot /
Per 6 Months $ 14.21
Tree Replanting Fee Per Tree [4] $ 1,526
For services requested of City Staff for which no fee is listed in this Master Fee Schedule, the City Manager or Department Director shall determine the appropriate fee based on the following hourly rates for staff time involved in the service.
Maintenance Staff per hr. 273 $
Engineering Staff per hr. 212 $
[Notes]
[1] Minor
One (1) single family residence
o < 1000 CY of grading
o >= 1000 CY of grading
Moderate
Abandonment of R/W or Easement
Two or more (2+) single family residences (<1 acre)
o C.3 Regulated
o Not C.3 Regulated
multi-family/mixed-use/commercial/industrial (< 1 acres) o C.3 regulated
o Not C.3 regulated
Major
Two or more (2+) single family residences (>= 1 acre)
Multi-family/mixed-use/commercial/industrial (>= 1 acres) Major project - new main line installation or replacement including sewer, storm, water, gas, and electric, major point repair, major development projects including offsite improvements. [5] Set by Title 21 of California Code of Regulation Section 1411.3 [2] Minor project - point repair or maintenance, service line repair or replacement, replacement of overhead utilities, traffic control only,
Moderate project - installation of overhead utilities, installation of equipment at a specific location (not linear),
Major project - installation or replacement of underground utilities, [3] Minor project - sewer lateral repair or installation (outside of roadway), sidewalk, curb, gutter, driveway, traffic control (only), minor utility point repair, installation or maintenance (above ground), discharge, minor roadway improvement,
Moderate project - sewer lateral repair or installation (within roadway), soil boring, moderate utility point repair, installation or maintenance (underground), [4] Amount of fee for the 24th box tree is subject to change based on actual vendor cost 13 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 719
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Building Department Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
2%
Less Than $5,000
Building Permit Fee base fee under $5,000 $ 343
Plan Check Fee base fee under $5,000 $ 286
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $5,000 $ 343
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 34.25
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $5,000 $ 286
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 24.27
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $25,000 $ 1,028
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 31.97
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $25,000 $ 770
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 23.98
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $50,000 $ 1,827
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 31.97
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $50,000 $ 1,370
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 23.98
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $100,000 $ 3,425
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 9.71
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $100,000 $ 2,570
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 7.28
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $500,000 $ 7,308
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 7.31
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $500,000 $ 5,481
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 5.48
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $1,000,000 $ 10,961
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 8.23
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $1,000,000 $ 8,221
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 6.16
$25,000 - $49,999
$50,000 - $99,999
$100,000 - $499,999
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Fee Unit / Type Notes
Service
Building Permits (single Family Residential)
$5,000 - $24,999
$500,000 - $999,999
$1,000,000 and Up
14 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 720
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Building Department Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
2%
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Fee Unit / Type Notes
Service
Less Than $10,000
Building Permit Fee base fee under $10,000 $ 571
Plan Check Fee base fee under $10,000 $ 913
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $10,000 $ 571
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 76.13
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $10,000 $ 913
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 30.45
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $25,000 $ 1,713
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 41.11
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $25,000 $ 1,370
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 36.54
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $50,000 $ 2,740
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 45.67
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $50,000 $ 2,284
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 36.54
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $100,000 $ 5,024
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 14.84
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $100,000 $ 4,111
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 10.28
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $500,000 $ 10,961
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 17.36
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $500,000 $ 8,221
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 16.44
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $1,000,000 $ 19,639
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 8.72
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $1,000,000 $ 16,442
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 3.25
Building Permits (Multi-Family Residential / Commercial / Industrial) $100,000 - $499,999
$10,000 - $24,999
$25,000 - $49,999
$50,000 - $99,999
$500,000 - $999,999
$1,000,000 - $9,999,999
15 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 721
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Building Department Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
2%
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Fee Unit / Type Notes
Service
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $10,000,000 $ 98,197
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 9.82
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $10,000,000 $ 45,673
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 8.23
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $20,000,000 $ 196,393
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 3.92
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $20,000,000 $ 127,884
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 3.80
Building Permit Fee base fee @ $50,000,000 $ 314,230
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 4.71
Plan Check Fee base fee @ $50,000,000 $ 242,066
each add'l $1,000 or
fraction thereof $ 4.84
Permitted Values for Construction:
per sq. ft. $ 232
Interior Remodels per sq. ft. $ 117
per sq. ft. $ 48
Decks per sq. ft. $ 39
Commercial Shell per sq. ft. $ 57
Tenant Improvements per sq. ft. $ 57
Electrical Permit
Residential: New Single Family
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per sq. ft. $ 0.09
Residential: Addition & Remodel
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per sq. ft. $ 0.09
Residential: New Multiple Family
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per sq. ft. $ 0.09
Commercial: New Shell Building
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per sq. ft. $ 0.09
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.09
Permit 3,000 sq. ft. min. $ 2,284
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.51
Swimming Pool, Spa, or Hot Tub Per Permit $ 274
Temporary Power Pole Per Permit $ 274
Main Electrical Service Per Permit $ 274
Per Permit $ 114
Commercial: Complex Tenant Improvements (Car Washes, Dry Cleaners, Laundries, Labs, R&D, Biotech, Restaurants, Spray Booths, Hazardous Areas)
New or Replacement Circuit for HVAC or Other
New Residential and Additions
Garages and Accessory Structures
Commercial: Addition, Remodel, Tenant Improvement
$10,000,000 - $19,999,999
$50,000,000 and Up
$20,000,000 - $49,999,999
16 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 722
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Building Department Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
2%
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Fee Unit / Type Notes
Service
New or Replacement Sub-Panel Per Permit $ 274
Miscellaneous Electrical Permit Per Permit $ 228
PV Solar Fee Per Permit $ 343
Plumbing Permit
Residential: New Single Family
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.09
Residential: Addition & Remodel
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.09
Residential: New Multiple Family
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.09
Commercial: New Shell Building
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.09
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.09
Permit 3,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum $ 2,284
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.51
Miscellaneous Plumbing Permit Per Permit $ 228
Swimming Pool, Spa, or Hot Tub Per Permit $ 228
Water Heater Replacement Per Permit $ 115
Gas Piping Extension for New FAU or HVAC Per Permit $ 114 Mechanical Permit
Residential: New Single Family
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.09
Residential: Kitchen & Bath Remodel Per Permit $ 114
Commercial: New Shell Building
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.09
Permit 1,700 sq. ft. min. $ 228
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.09
Permit 3000 sq. ft. min. $ 685
Each additional sq. ft. per add'l sq. ft. $ 0.16
New FAU or HVAC Installations Per Permit $ 366
Replacement FAU or HVAC Per Permit $ 228
Miscellaneous Mechanical Per Permit $ 228
Miscellaneous Building Fees
Grading Permit Fee for Swimming Pools Per Permit $ 114
Grading Permit Fee for Other than Swimming Pools Per Permit $ 114 Accessibility Plan Check of Building Permit 1 hour min. $ 228 Each additional hour each add'l hr. $ 228
Imaging Fees per page (standard size) Per Page $ 2.28
Commercial: Complex Tenant Improvements (Car Washes, Dry Cleaners, Laundries, Labs, R&D, Biotech, Restaurants, Spray Booths, Hazardous Areas)
Commercial: Addition, Remodel, Tenant Improvement
Commercial: Complex Tenant Improvements (Car Washes, Dry Cleaners, Laundries, Labs, R&D, Biotech, Restaurants, Spray Booths, Hazardous Areas)
Commercial: Addition, Remodel, Tenant Improvement
17 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 723
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Building Department Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
2%
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Fee Unit / Type Notes
Service
Imaging Fees per page (oversize) Per Page $ 4.57
Planning Application Review Per Permit $ 228
During Normal Business Hours 1 hour min. $ 228
Each additional hour each add'l hr. $ 228
Outside Business Hours 2 hour min. $ 492
Each additional hour each add'l hr. $ 246
Code Enforcement-City Attorney 1 hour min. [1] $ 327
Each additional hour each add'l hr. [1] $ 327
Dirt Haul Permit n/a reference PW fee
schedule
Municipal Code Violation Fees
First Violation Per Violation $ 100
Per Violation $ 200
Per Violation $ 500
GEO Plan Review / Soils Report Review n/a Actual Cost per Geologist
Per Instance $ 114
Additional Plan Check Fee Per Hour $ 228
Re-Inspection Fee Per Hour $ 228
Demolition Per Instance $ 228
Address Change Per Instance $ 228
Green Building Review Per Review $ 228
Energy Calculation Review Fee Per Review $ 114
Apartment Inspection Annual Fee
Per Residential Building Per Year $ 285
Per Dwelling Unit within each Building Per Year $ 14.41 Strong-Motion Instrumentation and Seismic Hazard Mapping Fee (SMIP) Residential Per Project 0.013% of Project
Valuation
Commercial Per Project 0.028% of Project
Valuation
SB1473 Building Standards Fee
$1 - 25,000 or fraction thereof per permit $ 1
$25,000.01 - 50,000 or fraction thereof per permit $ 2
$50,000.01 - 75,000 or fraction thereof per permit $ 3
$75,000.01 - 100,000 or fraction thereof per permit $ 4 GIS Mapping: New Construction, Addition, Alteration
Second Violation of the Same Ordinance within 36-mths
Add'l Violation of the same ordinance within 36-mths
Fees for Second and Each Additional Re-inspection:
18 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 724
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Building Department Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
2%
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Fee Unit / Type Notes
Service
Every $25,000.01 or fraction thereof above $100,000 each add'l $25,000.01 or fraction thereof $ 1
Per Permit
0.4% of Total
Permit Fee
Amount
Per Project [3]
0.65% of Building
Project Valuation
for all New
Construction and
Additions; Fee is
Applied on
Building Permit
Per Project [3]
0.09% of Building
Project Valuation
for all New
Construction and
Additions; Fee is
Applied on
Building Permit
Construction Time Limits Extension Fee
Fees for Additional Extensions
1st 60 Day Extension Per Project [2]
0.5% of Total
Value of Project
2nd 60 Day Extension Per Project [2]
1.0% of Total
Value of Project
3rd 60 Day Extension Per Project [2]
1.5% of Total
Value of Project
Construction Time Limits Completion Penalties
Period of Time That Projects Remain Incomplete Beyond Applicable Time Limits 30 Day Grace Period Per Project $0
31st Day Through 60th Day Per Project
0.01% Per Day of
Total Value of
Project
61st Day Through 120th Day Per Project
0.015% Per Day
of Total Value of
Project
General Plan Maintenance and Update - Staff Support
General Plan Maintenance and Update - Contract Services Technology Fee
19 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 725
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Community Development Department, Building Department Fees (Effective on July 1st, 2025)
2%
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Fee Unit / Type Notes
Service
121st Day & Every Day Thereafter Per Project
0.02% Per Day of
Total Value of
Project
Credit Card and eCheck Charges Each Transaction Actual Cost Building Division Staff Per Hour $ 228
Each Additional Hour Each add'l hr. $ 228
[Notes]
[2] The Building Official may waive an extension fee in the event he/she finds the complexity or size of the project requires a greater time than allotted or the reason for the extension request may be considered beyond the owner's control [3] Total General Plan Surcharge fee capped at $370,000 for building project valuations of more than $50 million For services requested of City Staff for which no fee is listed in this Master Fee Schedule, the City Manager or Department Director shall determine the appropriate fee based on the following hourly rates for staff time involved in the service:
[1] Subject to change per City Attorney contract
20 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 726
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Police Department Fees
(Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Accident Report [1]
Property damage only per report $ 10
Property damage with injuries per report $ 10
Fatality per report $ 10
County Jail Booking Fee County fee
Crime Report per report $ 10
False Alarm Response
First Response first call Fee Waived
Subsequent Calls per call $ 227
Impounded Vehicle [2]
Towed for criminal offenses per instance $ 112
Towed for all other offenses (abandoned, blocking
driveways, etc.) per instance 112 $
Unruly Gatherings
First Call $ -
Subsequent Calls per hour $ 339
Alarm Permit
New initial fee Fee Waived
Processing Permit for Excessive Cats & Dogs per instance $ 112 Processing Police Officer Subpoena per hour [3] $275/day deposit per GC
Tape of Radio/Video Transmission, Digital or Hard-copy
Photographs Per Request
actual cost of
materials
Credit Card and eCheck Charges Each Transaction Actual Cost Visa/Police Clearance Request Form Per Request $ 40
Non-Sworn Staff Members of the Police Department: per hour 112 $ Sworn Staff Members of the Police Department: per hour 339 $ For services requested of City staff which have no fee listed in this fee schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the established hourly rates for this department/division. Additionally, the City will pass-through to the applicant any discrete costs incurred from the use of external service providers if required to process the specific application.
Proposed Fee /
Deposit Service Fee Unit / Type Notes
21 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 727
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Police Department Fees
(Effective on July 1st, 2025)
[Notes]
[1] CA VC 20012 allows for recovery of the actual cost of providing accident report copies
[2] Towing charges are separate
[3] As set by GC 68096
22 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 728
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Parks and Recreation Department Fees
(Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Parks, Facility, Room, and Amenity Rentals
Adult Community Center Room Rentals 3-hour minimum
Park View Room [2] R $ 873 91 $ 113 $
NR $ 1,047 109 $ 135 $
NP $ 611 64 $ 79 $
Patio Room [2] R $ 522 72 $ 113 $
NR $ 626 86 $ 135 $
NP $ 366 51 $ 79 $
Park View Patio Room [2] R $ 1,084 113 $ 113 $
NR $ 1,300 135 $ 135 $
NP $ 758 79 $ 79 $
Game Room [2] R Not Available 522 $ 113 $
NR Not Available 626 $ 135 $
NP Not Available 366 $ 79 $
Chestnut Room [2] R $ 522 72 $ 113 $
NR $ 626 86 $ 135 $
NP $ 366 51 $ 79 $
Loft [2] R $ 522 72 $ 113 $
NR $ 626 86 $ 135 $
NP $ 366 51 $ 79 $
Rental Application Fee : $25 (non-refundable; will be applied to the rental fee) Patio Fee with ACC rental : $50 (may only be rented in conjunction with the Patio Room, Parkview Room, or Game Room) Kitchen Fee : $50 R, NR and NP (limited use; restrictions apply - information included in the rental packet) Youth Center Facility Rentals 2-hour minimum
Gym (Full) [2][3] R $ 329 120 $ 130 $
NR $ 435 143 $ 156 $
NP $ 231 83 $ 91 $
Gym (Half) [2][3] R $ Not Available Not Available 74
NR $ Not Available Not Available 89
NP $ Not Available Not Available 52
Dance Studio [2][3] R $ 224 65 $ 74 $
NR $ 270 78 $ 89 $
NP $ 156 46 $ 52 $
Arts & Crafts Room [2][3] R $ 202 52 $ 65 $
NR $ 234 63 $ 86 $
NP $ 142 36 $ 46 $
Homework Room [2][3] R $ 202 52 $ 65 $
NR $ 234 63 $ 86 $
NP $ 142 36 $ 46 $
Rental Application Fee : $25 (non-refundable; will be applied to the rental fee) Kitchen Fee : $25 R, NP and NR (limited use; restrictions apply - information included in the rental packet) Additional Services as Required Per Rental (Adult & Youth Centers):
Facility Attendant $33 Per Hour $33 Per Hour
Janitorial Services $220 Per Event or
Actual Cost
$220 Per Event or
Actual Cost
Insurance Actual Cost Actual Cost
Deposit - Parkview, Patio, Billiard Rooms n/a $500 Per Event Deposit - Patio, Chestnut Rooms, Gym n/a $250 Per Event Security Guard Fee - Private Rentals Serving Alcohol $67 Per Event or Actual Cost
$67 Per Event or
Actual Cost
Service
Notes
Category
(R=Resident,
NR=NonResident,
NP=Non-Profit)
Proposed Fees
Weekday Hourly
(Mon-Fri 5PM)
Weekend (Fri 5PM -
Sun)
Weekend Hourly
Additional
23 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 729
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Parks and Recreation Department Fees
(Effective on July 1st, 2025)
San Carlos Library Community Room Rental $72 Per Rental n/a Picnic Sites Rentals (March - October)
Laureola West Side Picnic Area, Laureola Park [4] $ Per Event 160 Playground Picnic Area, Burton Park [4] $ Per Event 160 Les Mundell Grove, Burton Park [4] $ Per Event 108
Chestnut Picnic Area, Burton Park [4] $ Per Event 108
Corn Hole Game Area, Chestnut Picnic Site (add-on) 25 $ Per Event Tot Lot Picnic Area, Burton Park [4] $ Per Event 84
Arguello Park: Sunny Site, Shady Site [4] $ Per Event 84 Crestview Park Picnic Area [4] $ Per Event 84
Bocce Ball
Court 1, Burton Park 20 $ Per Hour
Court 2, Burton Park 20 $ Per Hour
Rental Application Fee $ Each 25
Special Event Permit
New Request [1] $ Per Event 400
Repeat Request [1] $ Per Event 375
City Staff On-Sire Time During Event See Hourly Rate Per Hour Athletics ("Per Season/Per Quarter")
Light Use (Fields) $ Per Hour 32
Field Use Fee
R-NP $ Per Hour 29
NR-NP $ Per Hour 35
Sports League Field Use Fee:
San Carlos Youth Softball (Girls) 86 $ Per Player
Youth Baseball $ Per Player 86
Soccer $ Per Player 86
Baseball / Soccer Sports Tournament:
New Request Permit Fee 350 $ Per Event
Repeat Request Permit Fee 300 $ Per Event
Tennis:
Resident Tennis Club 16 $ Per Hour, Per Court
Non-Resident Tennis Club 22 $ Per Hour, Per Court
Snack Shack Use
Fall Season (August 15 - November 30) 308 $ Per Season
Spring Season (March 1 - May 31) 308 $ Per Season
Snack Shack Use (Outside of Primary Youth Sports Seasons) Rental Fee (Mon - Sun) 51 $ Per Week
Miscellaneous
Park Fitness Group Rental $ Per Hour 27
Administrative fees (apply to class registration only)
Registration $ Per Registrant 11
Refund $ Per Registrant 11
Neighborhood Block Party Permit (Up to 2 Block Parties Per Year) Fee Waived Community Events - City Sponsored
Including but not limited to: Farmers Market, Hometown Days, Art & Wine Faire, Night of Holiday Lights, Goblin Walk, Concerts, Downtown Block Party, etc.
Service
Notes
Primary Rate Unit
24 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 730
CITY OF SAN CARLOS
COST OF SERVICES (USER FEES) FY 2025-26 Proposed
Schedule of Parks and Recreation Department Fees
(Effective on July 1st, 2025)
Fees charged for City-sponsored Community Events shall be set at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Director and shall not exceed the estimated and reasonable cost of conducting the event
Per City Council authorization on February 28, 2022, Hometown Days booth fees with the exception of San Mateo County Health Department permit County Health Department permit fees and equipment rental fees will be waived for all non-profit organizations PW Maintenance Staff 273 $
Full-Time 196 $
Part-Time $ 33
Recreational Programs
Fees imposed for recreational programs offered by the City shall be set at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Director, not to exceed the cost of the individual programs. The City's full cost of implementing an individual program may be calculated as follows:
Program Cost of Service = [ (A x B) + C + D + E + F + G ] A = Estimated time for City staff to implement the individual program.
B = Applicable hourly rates for the staff functions involved in the implementation of the individual program (below).
C = Actual cost incurred by the City for any outside service provider involved in the individual program.
D = Actual Cost incurred by the City for any specific materials acquired for use during the individual program E = Prevailing facility rental and/or field use fees imposed by the City and reflected in its Master Fee Schedule F = Prevailing department / City administrative fee
G = Actual costs incurred by the City to rent and/or use facilities/fields from other entities The calculated cost of service above represents the maximum fee that could be imposed by the City for an individual recreation program. The City may recover between 0% and 100% of the cost of service. Cost recovery targets may vary by individual program, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Director as determined during the seasonal development of the City's program offerings. The City may also set differential fee for resident and non-resident participants as long as neither fee exceeds the cost of service. Any person with a home San Carlos mailing address is considered a resident. A San Carlos PO Box or business address will not be taken as proof of residency. A non-resident is someone who lives in another City. Non-resident fees will be charged at 20% of the class fee up to a $20 maximum per class. [Notes]
[1] In addition to Parks and Recreation staff time, time is spent by other City departments. Breakdown of other departments time and hourly rate information involved in approving special event permits is as follows:
20 minutes of Public Works staff time at $212 per hour; 20 minutes of Police staff time at $112 per hour;
10 minutes of Planning staff time at $333 per hour, and; 10 minutes of Building staff time at $228 per hour.
[2] Includes facility staff. Additional charge for janitorial services and insurance as needed. [3] Facility rental available for Youth related events only [4] Additional Charge for Insurance as Needed
For services requested of City staff which have no fee listed in this fee schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the established hourly rates for this department/division.
Additionally, the City will pass-through to the applicant any discrete costs incurred from the use of external service providers if required to process the specific application.
Service Primary Rate Notes
Unit
25 of 25
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 731
Impact Fees - FY25-26 Proposed Changes
PARK FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FEE (Municipal Code Chapter 3.34) E. Annual Increase. The fee set forth in subsection B of this section shall be increased annually by the percentage increase of park construction costs cited in the Engineering News Record, for the San Francisco Bay Area, as determined by City Engineer.
Existing
2,709
Proposed
Fee per bedroom $ $ 2,709
ENR City Cost Index Annual Change (March 2024 to March 2025) -1.42% SEWER CAPACITY CHARGES (Municipal Code Chapter 13.04)
E. The sewer capacity charge shall be adjusted annually based on the change in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index (20-Cities Average) from the March 2024 index.
Existing
14,270
Proposed
$ 14,534
RESIDENTIAL (charge per residential dwelling unit)
Single Family $
$
Multi-Family (includes Duplexes,
Apartments, Condos & Co-op
Projects) 6,601 $ 6,723
NON-RESIDENTIAL (charge per 100 gpd of estimated wastewater discharge) Commercial, Retail, Professional,
Institutional & Industrial Users 100 gpd
1gpd
$
$
7,510
75 $
$
7,649
76.00 ENR Construction Cost Index Change (see note below - March 2024 to March 2025) 1.85% Note - the % change for the FY25-26 Sewer Capacity Charge was calculated from the change in the CCI from March 2024 to March 2025 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE (Municipal Code Chapter 8.50)
E. Annual Increase. Effective October 28, 2020, per Ordinance 1562, the amount of the Traffic Impact Fee shall be $6,196 per p.m. peak hour trip, adjusted annually based on the Construction Cost Index published by the Engineering News Record.
Proposed
Land Use Existing Calculated Fee Proposed Calculated Fee Office
Research & Development
Manufacturing
Warehousing
Restaurant
Retail
Single-Family
Multi-Family (Condos/Apts)
Condo/Townhome
Hotel
Medical Office
ITE Trip Rate Unit Existing
1.15 1000 sf 7,477
0.49 1000 sf
0.67 1000 sf
0.19 1000 sf
9.77 1000 sf
3.81 1000 sf
0.99 Unit
0.56 Unit
0.56 Unit
0.6 Rooms
3.46 1000 sf
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,599
3,664
5,010
1,421
73,050
28,487
7,402
4,187
4,187
4,486
25,870
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
-1.42%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,599
3,664
5,010
1,421
73,050
28,487
7,402
4,187
4,187
4,486
25,870
-1.42%
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
7,477
ENR Construction Cost Index Change (March 2024 to March 2025) CHILD CARE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (Municipal Code Chapter 8.52) E. The child care development fee shall be adjusted annually based on the Construction Cost Index published by the Engineering News Record Reduced Feees for Nonresidential Developm Unit Existing
5.03 Proposed
Office/Research & Development (R&D) per sq. ft. 5.03
per sq. ft.
per sq. ft.
per sq. ft.
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Retail 2.52
1.61 1.61
2.52 1.61
1.61 Hotel
Industrial
ENR Construction Cost Index Change (March 2024 to March 2025) -1.42%
11.b
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 732
CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 28, 2025
ITEM TITLE: Receive a Presentation and Provide Direction on the Transportation Demand Management and Parking Reform Project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend that the Council receive a presentation and provide input on proposed strategies and reforms to transportation demand management and parking regulations.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None. Funds for this project were appropriated by the City Council in the fiscal year (FY) 2024-25 Capital Improvement Budget under C2206 (Parking Strategy) and C2210 (Transportation Demand Management Ordinance Amendment).
BACKGROUND:
The Transportation Demand Management and Parking Reform Project (“Project”) was initiated in June of 2024, with the purpose of developing reforms to the City’s parking requirements (both onand off-street) and transportation demand management (TDM) requirements. Amending these requirements is supported by the City Council’s 2024 Strategic Plan, which includes the following Strategic Goal:
“Actively pursue plans and strategies for improving mobility, traffic, parking, transportation infrastructure, and street maintenance while encouraging alternative modes of transportation to provide efficient, safe, and effective movement throughout the city.” Several of the City’s adopted long-range plans also include similar goals to improve mobility throughout the city such as the East Side Innovation District Vision Plan (2021) and Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Plan (2021), as well as plans currently in progress such as the 2045 General Plan Reset and the Northeast Area Specific Plan. The Environmental Impact Report for the 2045 General Plan Reset (on schedule for adoption in May 2025) includes a mitigation measure to amend the city’s TDM Program to increase the required trip reduction to the extent feasible to reduce transportation impacts from growth projected through the year 2045.
In addition to local long-range plans, recent state and regional laws have been adopted that prompt this effort. These include Assembly Bill (AB) 2097, which removes minimum parking requirements for projects within one-half mile of a major transit stop; AB 413, which prohibits parking within 20 feet of any marked or unmarked crosswalk; Federal Highway Administration Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG); and the Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Policy from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). Lastly, the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (“C/CAG”) oversees the Land Use Impact
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 733
Analysis Program Policy (commonly known as the TDM Policy) that requires local jurisdictions to notify and submit a TDM Checklist to C/CAG for projects that are estimated to generate 100 average daily trips (ADT) or more.
Given existing policies in local plans, regional policies, and state requirements, this project will address parking and TDM requirements in a comprehensive way. The anticipated timeline for completion of this project is by early 2026, which coincides with the MTC TOC Policy and would make the City eligible for One Bay Area Grants (OBAG) that could be utilized to fund bicycle and pedestrian improvements, local road repair, and Safe Routes to School programs.
To carry out this work, the City Council authorized a professional services agreement W-Trans for consulting services following a request for proposals process. W-Trans along with its subconsultant, Nelson/Nygaard, will prepare recommendations for TDM and parking reforms (both off-street and on-street) that carefully consider and respond to Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC), Council, developer, and community input; guidance from local, regional, and state policies; and recent parking supply and demand data. The reforms to the parking and TDM requirements would be reflected in the Municipal Code chapters 10.32 (Stopping, Standing, and Parking),18.20 (Parking and Loading), and 18.25 (Transportation Demand Management).
ANALYSIS:
This project was first presented to the PTC at its November 18, 2024 meeting where staff and the consultant team (W-Trans and Nelson/Nygaard) provided an overview of existing requirements, best-practices, and case studies for both parking and TDM regulations. Since the November 2024 study session, the consultant team has prepared an initial set of proposed strategies and reforms to both TDM and parking regulations that consider and respond to existing challenges; input from the Commission and stakeholders; and guidance from local, regional, and state policies.
The proposed strategies were most recently presented to the PTC at its April 7, 2025 meeting.
See attachment 1 for a summary of the PTC’s input. The purpose of this study session is to present and receive input from the City Council on the proposed strategies to help refine more formal technical requirements and the associated Ordinance amendments.
Overview of Proposed Parking Strategies
The recommended parking code reforms and strategies were prepared based on key challenges identified by W-Trans to meet the City’s future needs. The recommendations summarized below fall into four main categories: off-street parking standards, on-street parking management, shared parking, and multimodal access. Below is a summary of potential parking reforms in each category, which will be discussed further in the presentation at the study session.
Off-Street Parking Standards
1. New Parking Districts: Establish a new Transit District, Suburban District, and subdistricts (see Figure 1). A proposed Transit District would align with areas where AB 2097 and the MTC TOC Policy apply (light grey areas). The Suburban District (dark grey areas) encompasses the remainder of the city. Within the Transit District, seven subdistricts would enable more focused, area-specific policies including the Downtown, East Side Innovation District, and Northeast Area.
2. Parking Maximums: Implement tiered vehicle parking maximums for the Transit District
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 734
with caps on the number of new parking spaces for each subdistrict. Developments would be subject to a “soft” (Tier 1) and “firm” (Tier 2) maximum. Developers may be permitted to provide up to the Tier 1 maximum, and up to the Tier 2 maximum if a public benefit, such as public parking or additional TDM measures are provided.
3. Adjust Parking Minimums: Maintain and adjust minimum vehicle parking ratios for the Suburban District to better align parking requirements with actual demand and reduce oversupply of parking.
4. Unbundled Parking: Require unbundled parking for new residential and nonresidential developments where parking spaces shall be leased or sold separately from the rental or purchase fees.
5. Adjust Loading Standards: Adopt new loading standards for developments with 10,000 square-feet or more non-residential floor area and/or 100 or more residential units.
Figure 1: Map of Proposed Parking Districts and Subdistricts On-Street Parking Management
1. Residential Permit Parking: Adopt a framework for new Residential Permit Parking (RPP) program with a limit of three permits per household and an escalating price structure (i.e. $25 for the first permit, $50 for the second permit, etc.). Pricing should not be overly
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 735
burdensome or generate excess revenue but be high enough to discourage purchasing unnecessary permits. In addition, new multi-family developments could be excluded from purchasing residential permits if they are anticipated to cause excess demand of available on-street supply.
2. Parking Management Authority: Grant parking management authority to the Public Works Director to enable City staff to be responsive to changes in parking demand without seeking City Council approval. Parking management regulations could include timelimited vehicle parking, permit parking, accessible parking, and loading zone designation.
3. Parking Pricing Framework: Adopt a framework for priced parking where non-residential streets and off-street public parking facilities with high occupancies meeting certain criteria should be priced. The Public Works Director would be able to adjust parking rates annually, $0.50 at a time, within set boundaries to maintain occupancy levels of 70 to 85 percent. This may be implemented following the completion a pilot “meterless” paid parking program (Senate Bill 532).
4. Parking Enforcement: Transition from enforcement through the County Sheriff’s Office to an internal office of Community Service Officers (CSOs), or third-party enforcement.
5. 24-Hour Time Restrictions: Prohibit on-street vehicle parking for over 24 hours in the Northeast Area, East Side Innovation District, and Southeast Industrial Area for vehicles without permits.
Shared Parking
1. Shared Parking Agreements for Existing Lots: Pursue shared parking agreements with Caltrain and private off-street lot owners where higher parking demand exists.
2. Required Shared Parking for New Uses: Codify the ability to require that new parking in the Transit District be shared with the public under AB 2097.
3. Incentivize Shared Parking with Maximums: Allow developers to create more on-site parking, up to the Tier 2 maximum, if all off-street parking is publicly accessible during some or all hours.
Multimodal Access
1. Adjust Bicycle Parking Requirements: Revise bicycle parking requirements to be independent of the number of vehicle parking spaces required and consider newer or emerging bicycle types within design criteria.
2. Transportation Management Association: Create a citywide Transportation Management Association (TMA), which is typically a partnership of entities established to promote joint programs with the goal of reducing vehicle trips and congestion. At minimum, the citywide TMA should include the Downtown, Northeast Area, and the East Side Innovation District, as well as other areas of the city or neighboring cities if desired.
3. Daylighting Law: Reference the State’s “Daylighting” law (AB 413) in the Municipal Code, which prohibits on-street vehicle parking within 20 feet on the approach to a marked or unmarked crosswalk to increase visibility between drivers and pedestrians within a
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 736
crosswalk.
4. Mobility Information: Provide online mobility information for visitors, employees, residents, etc. traveling to/from high-activity districts. Mobility information could include resources for commuter programs, parking lot locations, parking costs, and parking regulations.
5. Public Bicycle Parking: Install bicycle parking hubs in public areas near a high density of non-residential uses with bicycle racks, lockers, and a repair station.
Overview of Proposed TDM Program
Transportation Demand Management, or TDM, refers to policies and strategies that aim to reduce vehicle trips by shifting those trips to other modes of travel (carpool, bicycles, pedestrians, transit trips) to reduce congestion. San Carlos Municipal Code Chapter 18.25 (Transportation Demand Management) outlines existing TDM regulations which requires a minimum 20% trip reduction based on a static menu of TDM measures to achieve the minimum reduction.
The TDM Program currently being proposed by Nelson/Nygaard was informed by an assessment of the City’s existing requirements as well as regional TDM policies, programs, and practices; available TDM Plans and monitoring data for approved development projects; and feedback from stakeholders and the Planning and Transportation Commission. The TDM Program is summarized below into five components: program structure, applicability, requirements, performance monitoring, and compliance.
Program Structure
1. Update the TDM Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 18.25) to align with regional bestpractices and aim to meet or exceed trip reduction requirements in the C/CAG TDM Policy.
This will allow the City to seek an exemption from C/CAG to reduce duplication of efforts and requirements.
2. Create TDM Guidelines to accompany the TDM Ordinance to include a user-friendly library of TDM measures, guidance for implementation, and templates for monitoring and reporting. The TDM Guidelines may also be updated administratively if a minor change to the TDM Program is needed.
3. Allocate additional staffing resources to support implementation of the upcoming TDM requirements and monitor TDM plans on a consistent basis. Staffing options could include a new internal position, external contract services, or shared responsibilities with a future TMA. Funding for additional staffing resources could include the General Fund, TDM Program fees, parking revenue, or regional grants.
Applicability
1. Apply TDM Requirements to two tiers of project sizes based on the estimated average daily trips (ADT). “Small” projects would include projects estimated to generate between 100 to 999 ADTs. “Large” projects would include projects estimated to generate 1,000 ADTs or more. Projects that generate fewer than 100 ADTs would be exempt from TDM requirements. These tiers also align with the City’s Transportation Study (TS) Guidelines, which will simplify the TDM analysis and approval process.
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 737
2. Set a TDM point target for each project based on project size, geographic location, and land use. Each TDM point would be approximately equivalent to a 1% reduction in average daily trips. Differentiating requirements based on geography, specifically projects within one-half mile of a major transit stop, allows the City to tailor transit-supportive TDM measures for projects closer to transit. See Table 1 for the recommended TDM point targets by land use, size, and location.
3. Include exemptions for small or key project types to streamline their approval. This would include 100% affordable housing projects, residential projects with less than 10 units, and very small nonresidential projects that generate fewer than 100 ADT.
Table 1: Recommended TDM Point Targets
Point Target: Small
Projects
Point Target: Large
Projects
Land Use Close to
Transit
(<0.5 mi)
All Other
Areas
Close to
Transit
(<0.5 mi)
All Other
Areas
Residential 25 25 25 30
Dining or retail 25 25 25 30
Hotel or lodging 25 35 25 35
Non-residential (all other) 30 35 30 35
Requirements
1. Maintain a list of TDM strategies that would include required strategies (specified for each land use, project size, and location) and a menu of optional TDM strategies to meet the minimum TDM point target.
2. Establish project submittal requirements including a TDM Plan, a one-time application fee, and a recurring program fee. The TDM Plan would also include a standardized checklist indicating which measures are to be implemented. Fees collected as part of development projects would help provide resources to manage the overall TDM Program over time including time-spent reviewing TDM Plans, ongoing monitoring, and updating the TDM Guidelines over time.
Performance Monitoring and Compliance
1. Require annual performance monitoring through surveys and driveway vehicle counts to document the continued implementation of TDM measures. The City could also establish an annual monitoring cycle to occur in the fall of each year to reduce costs and staff time.
2. Establish compliance thresholds that ensure compliance but are not overly burdensome for smaller projects to meet. Compliance would be determined through an annual monitoring report. For smaller projects, compliance could be demonstrated by submitting materials (photos, receipts, etc.) that show implementation of TDM measures.
Large projects would require driveway vehicle trip counts annually and would be considered noncompliant if they fail to implement TDM measures and meet their TDM point target.
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 738
3. Enforce noncompliance through a phased approach that includes ability to revise the TDM Plan, increase monitoring, or collect financial penalties. The level of enforcement would also scale up based on the occurrence of violations. For example, upon the first and second violations, the property owner or manager would need to submit an amended TDM Plan identifying steps that will be made to become compliant. Lastly, a third violation could incur financial penalties if the property is still noncompliant even after implementation of additional TDM measures.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
Given the technical nature of parking and TDM requirements, community engagement for this project consisted of targeted outreach to stakeholders that implement parking and TDM measures. In-lieu of holding general community workshops, City staff and the consultant team are presenting this project to the Planning and Transportation Commission, who serve as the technical advisory committee, over the course of the project. This provides multiple opportunities for the general public to provide input in the various phases of the project.
The initial phase of community engagement included a series of stakeholder meetings focused on parking and TDM issue areas and challenges held between November 2024 to January 2025.
These included:
• 4 Virtual focus group meetings with developers, large employers, transportation professionals, and Greater East San Carlos (GESC) board members. • 1 Youth Advisory Council meeting
• 1 Industrial Arts Business Association (IABA) meeting • 1 Open House event, which included information and resources for several Citywide efforts.
To receive input on the potential strategies for both parking and TDM, two additional stakeholder meetings were held with neighborhood groups (including GESC and IABA) and transportation professionals (including Commute.org, C/CAG, and San Carlos Bikes). These meetings were held virtually on March 24 and 25. See Tables 2a and 2b below for a summary of their input.
Table 2a: Key Takeaways from March 24, 2025 Stakeholder Meeting with Neighborhood Groups:
Questions and Concerns Comments and Recommendations
• Concern for changing residential
parking permit requirements in GESC
neighborhood
• Lack of TDM policy enforcement
• Lack of parking enforcement
• Surrounding businesses are causing
parking impacts in residential
neighborhoods
• Reducing street parking time restrictions
from 72 hours to 24 hours would be
helpful
Table 2b: Key Takeaways from March 25, 2025 Stakeholder Meeting with Transportation Professionals:
Questions and Concerns Comments and Recommendations
• Clarification on unbundled parking
• In favor of daylighting requirements
but enforcement could be an issue
• Encourage a collaborative TDM
framework without overlapping services
or multiple TMAs
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 739
• The Caltrain parking lot is
underutilized and difficult to access
across El Camino Real
• Agree with residential parking permit
requirements
• Recommend close communication with
the City, Commute.org, and C/CAG
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:
The purpose of this study session is to receive input from the City Council on the proposed strategies for both parking and TDM to help staff and the consultant team prepare more formal technical requirements and the associated Ordinance amendments. To facilitate the City Council’s discussion, below are topics and discussion questions the Council could consider responding to at the study session:
1. What is the Council’s feedback on the draft parking requirements, including vehicles and bicycles, and the draft residential parking permit program?
2. What is the Council’s feedback on granting the Public Works Director authority to adjust parking regulations as-needed? Are there limitations the Council would recommend?
3. Do the proposed TDM point targets seem appropriately calibrated for land uses, project sizes, and project locations?
4. Which TDM strategies should be prioritized to best enhance the TDM Program? NEXT STEPS:
The City Council’s feedback on the proposed strategies for both parking and TDM requirements will be incorporated into more refined technical requirements and associated Ordinance language.
The project team will finalize a full report with Ordinance language that eventually will be issued for public review and be presented in future study sessions with the Planning and Transportation Commission and the City Council around August of this year.
Respectfully submitted by:
Al Savay, Community Development Director
Approved for submission by:
_______________________
Jeff Maltbie, City Manager
ATTACHMENT(S):
1. Planning and Transportation Commission Meeting Summary– April 7, 2025
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 740
Planning and Transportation Commission Study Session
Transportation Demand Management and Parking Reform Project Meeting Summary
April 7, 2025
COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS: PARKING
1. Vice Chair Garvey inquired about the types of public benefits that are most appealing to developers.
▪ Brian Canepa shared that residential and non-residential developers are more open to the idea of publicly accessible parking, while residential developers are less inclined to make a portion of their parking accessible. He mentioned that most developers prefer having no parking maximums, and the City is working to establish parking maximum levels that do not hinder residential development.
2. Vice Chair Garvey inquired about the utilization of the parking allocated to the hotel and the two large residential developments.
▪ Brian Canepa stated that he does not believe parcel by parcel parking occupancy studies have been conducted by the City as it is costly and time intensive.
3. Vice Chair Garvey suggested that obtaining that set of data would be helpful. ▪ Brian Canepa stated that they rely on industry data for various uses. He shared that the Institute of Transportation Engineers provides a Parking Generation Manual, which includes data on peak parking demand by use type, aggregated through the entire U.S. Brian Canepa stated that a lot of the process will be driven by public feedback.
4. Vice Chair Garvey commented that granting authority to the Public Works Director helps streamline decisions while still allowing for public input and dialogue. ▪ Brian Canepa shared that elected officials are often relieved not to handle the politically sensitive issue of parking, as it becomes more of a technical matter.
The goal is to give staff flexibility for current and future development while ensuring the City Council retains the ability to step in if needed.
5. Commissioner Bundy inquired about whether the proposed Tier 1 parking maximums, which are based on past local developments, could be tightened — and if doing so might affect the city's appeal to developers.
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 741
▪ Brian Canepa shared that they are aiming to find the right balance between meeting market demands and achieving the goals of the City and regional policies. He noted that this approach does not prevent a development from leasing additional parking from another party if needed.
6. Commissioner Anand inquired whether there are provisions for exemptions for lowincome residents living in single-family homes. ▪ Brian Canepa shared that there are many equity measures that the city could apply.
7. Commissioner Anand inquired how the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation ratio is factored in when there are shared lots between public and private parking.
▪ Brian Canepa explained that as part of the shared parking agreement, there is still a need to meet ADA requirements.
8. Commissioner Anand inquired about the thought behind shifting parking enforcement from county sheriff's office to community service officers or third-party vendors. ▪ Brian Canepa explained that a recurring piece of community feedback was the lack of consistent enforcement by the Sheriff’s Office, largely due to workload and prioritization challenges. He noted that monitoring and enforcement—both for parking and Transportation Demand Management (TDM)—were key concerns, and the goal is to address these issues with appropriate funding.
COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS: TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
1. Commissioner Castaneda inquired whether the study's category for businesses generating fewer than 100 Average Daily Trips (ADT) includes public services such as daycare centers and services for individuals with disabilities. ▪ Phil Olmstead shared that ADT is typically determined based on industry standards, with specific guidelines established for each type of land use.
2. Commissioner Castaneda suggested that public service businesses could be considered for ADT exemptions.
▪ Phil Olmstead shared that generally the ADT is set on industry guidelines about land uses and how many trips that use generates. Triggering the 100 ADT threshold would equate to a certain size for that land use. He shared that the project team could find that information for that type of specific land uses.
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 742
3. Commissioner Anand inquired if there are other success metrics besides ADT. ▪ Phil Olmstead shared that he is still working with City staff to define what success looks like, with trip reduction targets being one of the key metrics. He added that they are also working to establish a baseline to measure progress once the program begins. Phil Olmstead also shared that mode split is another metric to look at.
4. Commissioner Anand asked whether parking policy changes near city borders could cause spillover effects, such as people parking in a neighboring city while visiting businesses in the originating city.
▪ Brian Canepa addressed concerns about parking spillover by emphasizing that regional pressures are driving similar parking policy changes across neighboring cities, helping maintain competitiveness for San Carlos. He noted that successful cities like Walnut Creek and Redwood City use parking pricing to manage demand without deterring visitors. The goal is to avoid pushing parking problems into adjacent neighborhoods, and the proposed measures have been designed with that in mind, considering both residential and employee parking needs.
5. Commissioner Bundy inquired about the logic behind why suburban zones have higher percentage reduction targets than transit zones. ▪ Phil Olmstead explained that projects located near transit receive a kind of “credit” or lower trip reduction targets, similar to C/CAG policies. He shared that Staff believes developments farther from transit should do more to reduce vehicle trips, especially for larger projects generating more traffic. While this idea is still open to discussion, most planned developments are already in transit zones. Many suburban projects would be exempt from the policy due to single-family homes being below the 100 ADT threshold.
6. Commissioner Bundy inquired whether renting parking spaces from a neighboring property qualifies as part of the shared on-site parking strategy under parking supply. ▪ Phil Olmstead explained that sharing on-site parking will count toward meeting TDM goals, with flexible point values depending on city priorities. The aim is to avoid rewarding projects that meet TDM goals but still offer excessive free parking, which would conflict with the program’s purpose.
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 743
7. Commissioner Bundy inquired how one gets credit based on the parking pricing strategy.
▪ Phil Olmstead explained that the strategy details still need to be finalized, but options like charging for parking or unbundling it are seen as highly effective in supporting trip reduction goals.
8. Vice Chair Garvey inquired if developers have a choice of TDM Strategies that they want to pursue or it would be mandated by the City.
▪ Phil Olmstead emphasized the importance of balancing mandatory and flexible strategies in the program. While some baseline requirements should be set, a menu of optional strategies should be offered to accommodate different tenant mixes and development types, allowing for customization without being overly prescriptive. Phil Olmstead added that unbundled parking will definitely be required and that mandatory membership in the City's Transportation Management Association (TMA) for large developments is recommended.
While the specifics of what membership entails haven't been defined yet, it will likely be a key recommendation moving forward.
9. Vice Chair Garvey inquired about the timeline for rewriting the TDM ordinances and noted that completing it sooner rather than later would be beneficial—particularly because it could strengthen the City's position when applying for grants. ▪ Phil Olmstead shared that the plan is to have a draft in the Summer. He stated that their plan is to revise Chapter 18.25 with all recommended changes, keeping the ordinance streamlined, while using a separate document for flexible updates like strategy adjustments or point values—avoiding the need for City Council approval for minor changes.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. Jennifer Rosse GESC Co-President (Zoom) expressed concerns about proposed parking changes, emphasizing a past agreement that the Transit Village residents would not be charged for permits. Jennifer Rosse highlighted parking issues caused by business permits, questioned whether the new system would apply citywide, and requested more details on commercial permit policies. Jennifer Rosse also asked that shuttle routes avoid GESC’s slow streets.
2. Sonia Elks (Zoom) expressed strong support for the Wheeler Plaza model, where residential buildings include public parking. Sonia Elks shared disappointment to hear
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 744
that some outreach suggested residential parking buildings were not in favor of shared parking. Sonia Elks emphasized the model is beneficial for supporting downtown businesses and hopes the City will encourage more developments to adopt it.
STAFF AND CONSULTANT TEAM RESPONSES
1. Rendell Bustos responded to the two public comments, stating that Staff will investigate the agreement between the City and Trestle regarding the permit program.
He also clarified that shuttles are included as part of the TDM strategy options.
2. Brian Canepa clarified that the business permits are charged in the GESC and shared that per the City website the permit is $38 plus processing fee. He also clarified that the residential permit parking program would follow a consistent process citywide.
Individual streets or districts could initiate the program by voting for it, rather than being imposed by City officials. He added that any area in the City could go through this process, and if approved, would follow the same rules and procedures.
3. Brian Canepa addressed Sonia Elks’ question about shared parking space. He clarified that it was the residential developers—not the residents—who were opposed to sharing parking.
4. Phil Olmstead further explained the shuttle question addressed by Jennifer Rosse.
He stated that shuttles are included as a potential TDM strategy, but due to their high cost and complexity, they should be coordinated citywide—ideally through a Transportation Management Association (TMA)—rather than implemented individually by each development.
COMMISSIONER CLOSING COMMENTS
1. Commissioner Castaneda stated that establishing an organization like a TMA to coordinate the collective efforts of developers would be an excellent idea.
2. Commissioner Bundy requested case studies from other cities on parking districts to gain a better understanding of the burdens and benefits of such a strategy.
3. Commissioner Anand supported demand-based pricing and shared-use parking, emphasized equity in permit pricing and unbundled parking to avoid burdening the
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 745
community. She favored a citywide TMA and exploring regional partnerships to extend the City’s reach.
4. Vice Chair Garvey supported removing parking minimums, setting parking maximums, creating a new residential parking framework, and giving the Public Works Director authority to adjust rates. She appreciated public input and outreach efforts and is looking forward to the next study session.
12.a
April 28, 2025 Packet Pg. 746