Agenda packet — San Carlos City Council, May 27, 2025 (part 8 of 9)

AC TIONS
7 PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
178 GENERAL PLAN
ACTION PR-4.6 Study the feasibility of minimizing the
use of new lawns in City parks and the
replacement of some existing lawns
with meadows or no-mow turf alternatives.

ACTION PR-4.7 Continue department policy of not
purchasing or providing water in plastic bottles.

Park bench at Vista Park
POLICY PR-5.1 Continue to use the Parks and
Recreation Commission as a forum for resident involvement in decision making relating to parks and recreation.

POLICY PR-5.2 Provide regular outreach to the public
about City parks and recreational programs.

POLICY PR-5.3 Support community efforts to use
parks and recreation as an expression of civic pride.

POLICIES
GOAL
PR-5
Promote civic engagement in parks and recreation.
7 PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 179
POLICY PR-5.4 Work with the Parks and Recreation
Foundation and other civic or private organizations to raise private funds for prioritized projects.

POLICY PR-5.5 Continue to support community
events, volunteers and non-profits.

POLICY PR-5.6 Continue to support and partner with
other City departments to meet City and department goals.

POLICY PR-5.7 Continue to support and recognize the
role of community groups.

Intentionally Left Blank
Noise Element
GENERAL PLAN 258
9 NOISE ELEMENT
Introduction State law requires that the General Plan include a Noise Element, which is to be prepared according to guidelines adopted by the California Office of Noise Control (ONC). In accordance with State law requirements, this Noise Element provides a systematic approach to limiting community exposure to noise, including the following components:
 Quantitative analysis, based on noise
measurements and modeling of major existing and future noise sources in the community, including both mobile and stationary sources;  Mapping of generalized noise level contours to be
used as a basis for land use decision-making; and
Contents
Introduction Background Information
Noise Terminology Noise Control Ordinance 1086 Land Use Compatibility Existing Noise Future Noise 239 Goals, Policies and Actions
The purpose of the Noise Element is to identify sources of noise in San Carlos and to define strategies for reducing the negative impact of noise to the community. Noise is an environ- mental pollutant that can threaten the quality of life and human health by causing annoyance or disrupting sleep and everyday activities. With the presence of significant noise sources in San Carlos, including Highway 101, El Camino Real, the Caltrain corridor and the San Carlos Airport, reducing the negative impact of unwanted and excessive noise is an important aspect of maintaining the city’s high quality of life and community character. 9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 259
 Goals, policies and actions to address community
exposure to existing and projected noise sources.

The Noise Element describes compatible land uses for varying noise levels, provides background information on existing sources of noise and projects noise conditions in 2030. The Noise Element is divided into two basic sections:
 Background Information
 Goals, Policies and Actions
Background Information The following provides a discussion of existing and future noise sources within San Carlos, as well as how these noise sources affect the various land use types in the city. Major noise sources that will be addressed include transportation sources such as traffic, public transit and airport and industrial operations. The Noise Element should provide a systematic approach to the measurement and modeling of noise; the establishment of noise standards; the control of major noise sources; and community planning for the regulation of noise. This Noise Element provides baseline information on the existing noise environment based on noise measurements taken throughout the city and identifies noise-sensitive uses in San Carlos.

According to State Government Code and the State Office of Noise Control Guidelines, the following major noise sources should be considered in the preparation of a Noise Element:
 Highways and freeways.  Primary arterials and major local streets.  Railroad operations.  Aircraft and airport operations.  Local industrial facilities.  Other stationary sources.

The Noise Element establishes uniformity between City policy and programs undertaken to control and abate environmental noise. The California Government Code and State Office of Noise Control Guidelines require that certain major noise sources and areas containing noise-sensitive land uses be identified and quantified by preparing generalized noise exposure contours 9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 260
for current and projected levels of activity within the community. The noise exposure information developed for the Noise Element is incorporated into the General Plan to serve as a basis for achieving land use compatibility with respect to noise. Noise exposure information is also used to provide baseline levels and noise source identification for use in the development and enforcement of a local noise control ordinance and for ensuring compliance with the State’s noise insulation standards, which are discussed in more detail below.

Noise Terminology
The discussion of noise requires the use of a number of technical terms. Some of the key noise-related terms used in this Element include:
 Decibel (dB). A decibel is a unit of measurement
which indicates the relative amplitude of a sound. The zero on the decibel scale is based on the lowest sound level that the healthy, unimpaired human ear can detect. Sound levels in decibels are calculated on a logarithmic basis. Each 10 decibel increase in sound level is perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness over a fairly wide range of intensities.  A-weighted sound level (dBA). The A-weighted
sound level is the most common method to characterize sound in California. This scale gives greater weight to the frequencies of sound to which the human ear is most sensitive. All sound levels in this chapter are A-weighted, unless reported otherwise.  Energy-equivalent sound/noise level (Leq). Leq
describes the average level that has the same acoustical energy as the summation of all the timevarying events. This descriptor is useful because sound levels can vary markedly over a short period of time. The most common averaging period for Leq is hourly, but it can be of any duration.
 Day/night average sound level (Ldn). Since the
sensitivity to noise increases during the evening and at night, 24-hour descriptors have been developed that incorporate artificial noise penalties added to quiet-time noise events. Ldn is a measure of the cumulative noise exposure in a community, with a 10 dB addition to nocturnal (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) noise levels. 9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 261
This is the measurement that the City of San Carlos normally uses in noise evaluations and analysis.  Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL).

CNEL is the energy average of the A-weighted sound levels occurring during a 24-hour period, with 10 dB added to the A-weighted sound levels occurring between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. and 5 dB added to the A-weighted sound levels occurring between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m.

Noise Control Ordinance 1086
The City of San Carlos’ noise ordinance is intended to protect residents and visitors to San Carlos from unreasonable noise associated with machines, persons, or devices. It specifies that unreasonable noise is that which exceeds 10 dBA above local ambient noise levels. Noise levels are measured at a distance of 49 feet from the property lines of either public or private property. Some noise sources are exempt from these regulations, including transportation, construction, home workshops or gardening tools and solid waste pick-up. Violations of the specified noise levels are monitored by the San Carlos Police Department and are considered misdemeanors.

Land Use Compatibility Land uses deemed as noise sensitive by the State of California include schools, hospitals, rest homes, longterm care and mental care facilities. Many jurisdictions consider residential uses particularly noise sensitive because families and individuals expect to use time in the home for rest and relaxation and noise can interfere with these activities. Some variability in standards for noise sensitivity may apply to different densities of residential development; single-family uses are frequently considered the most sensitive. Jurisdictions may identify other uses as noise sensitive such as churches, libraries, day care centers and parks. Land uses that are relatively insensitive to noise include some office, commercial and retail developments. There is a range of insensitive noise receptors which generate significant noise levels or where hu- man occupancy is typically low. Examples of insensitive uses include industrial and manufacturing uses, utilities, agriculture, vacant land, parking lots and transit terminals. To assist with evaluating the compatibility of land uses with various noise levels, the California General Plan 9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 262
Guidelines compare the compatibility of noise levels with various land uses. Figure 9-1 summarizes the Guidelines’ recommendations. Research determined how much noise is acceptable for different land uses. In the mid-1970s, the Environmental Protection Agency concluded that a noise level of 55 dBA Ldn (including a 5 dBA margin of safety) would have “no impact” on a residence. The State of California built upon this information and established guidelines suggesting 60 dBA Ldn as an upper limit for acceptable environmental noise in a residential setting. Certain land uses are sensitive to noise outdoors and exterior noise thresholds are appropriate.

Other land uses are only sensitive to noise indoors (e.g. professional office spaces, high-density housing in a downtown area).

One of the requirements of a Noise Element is to facilitate the noise insulation standards contained in the State Building Code that are applicable to new multifamily housing development. Where the exterior noise exposure level is 60 dBA Ldn or greater, the residential building must attenuate the interior noise level to 45
dBA Ldn or less in residential living areas. The intent of the Noise and Land Use Compatibility Guidelines is to achieve an interior noise level of 45 dBA Ldn or less in all new residential housing. Three acceptability categories are identified: normally acceptable, condition- ally acceptable and unacceptable. In the normally acceptable category, a use would be acceptable without additional mitigation measures. In the conditionally acceptable category, the use would be acceptable with the application of mitigation measures. In the unacceptable category, the use may be unacceptable even after the application of available mitigation measures.

Existing Noise A noise study was completed as part of the General Plan update and included noise measurements along major roadways. The major noise sources in San Carlos are vehicular traffic on major roadways, railroad operations along the Caltrain corridor and the San Carlos Airport. Table 9-2 details the current traffic noise levels for major roadways in San Carlos. 9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 263
FIGURE 9-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENT Land Use Category
Exterior Noise Exposure (Ldn)
55 60 65 70 75 80
Single-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential, Hotels and Motels aOutdoor Sports and Recreation, Neighborhood Parks and Playgrounds Schools, Libraries, Museums, Hospitals, Personal Care, Meeting Halls, Churches Office Buildings, Business, Commercial and Professional Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters a See Policy NOI-1.5.

NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE. Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction, without any special insulation requirements.

CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE. Specified land use may be permitted only after detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements and needed noise insulation features included in the design.

UNACCEPTABLE. New construction or development should generally not be undertaken because mitigation is usually not feasible to comply with noise element policies.
9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 264
Hourly
Exterior Noise-Level
Standard In Any Hour
(dBA)
Interior Noise-Level
Standard In Any Hour
(dBA)
Land Use Receiving the Noise
Noise-Level
Descriptor
Daytime
(7am-10pm)
Nighttime
(10pm-7am)
Daytime
(7am-10pm)
Nighttime
(10pm-7am)
Residential
L
eq 55 45 40 30
L
max 70 60 55 45
Medical, convalescent
L
eq 55 45 45 35
L
max 70 60 55 45
Theater, auditorium
L
eq -- -- 35 35
L
max -- -- 50 50
Church, meeting hall
L
eq 55 -- 40 40
L
max -- -- 55 55
School, library, museum
L
eq 55 -- 40 --
L
max -- -- 55 --
Notes:

1. The Residential standards apply to all residentially zoned properties.2. Each of the noise levels specified above shall be lowered by 5 dBA for tonal noises characterized by a whine, screech, or hum, noises consisting primarily of speech or music, or recurring impulsive noises.

3. In situations where the existing noise level exceeds the noise levels indicated in the above table, any new noise source must include mitigation that reduces the noise level of the noise source to the existing level.

4. The exterior noise standards are measured at any point on the receiving property where there is, or could be in the future, frequent human use and quiet would be beneficial.

5. These standards do not apply to temporary sources such as construction activities.

TABLE 9-1 NON-TRANSPORTATION NOISE STANDARDS
9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 265
Major
Roadway Segment
Ldn at
75 ft, dBA*
2009
Existing
Major
Roadway Segment
Ldn at
75 ft, dBA*
2009
Existing
* Noise levels are given at a distance of 75 feet from the center of the roadway.

TABLE 9-2 2009 VEHICULAR TRAFFIC NOISE ON

MAJOR ROADWAYS
El Camino Real
North of Holly St 69 San Carlos Ave to Brittan Ave 68 Brittan Ave to Howard Ave 69 South of Howard Ave 69 Holly Street
West of El Camino Real 62 Old County Rd to Industrial Way 65 East of Industrial Way 68 Old County Road
North of Holly St 63 Holly St to Brittan Ave 64 Brittan Ave to Howard Ave 64 South of Holly St 62 Industrial Road
North of Holly St. 61 Holly St to Brittan Ave 66 South of Brittan Ave 66 San Carlos Avenue
North of Club Dr 63 Club to Alameda de Las Pulgas 65 Alameda de Las Pulgas to El Camino Real 62 East of El Camino Real 59 Brittan Avenue
West of Alameda de Las Pulgas 61 Alameda de Las Pulgas to El Camino Real 62 Old County Rd to Industrial Way 64 East of Industrial Way 64 Howard Avenue
West of El Camino Real 59 East of Old County Rd 60
Dartmouth Avenue East of San Carlos Ave 59 Club Drive West of San Carlos Ave 57 Alameda de Las Pulgas San Carlos Ave to Brittan Ave 62 South of Brittan Ave 63 9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 266
Vehicular
Traffic continues to be the most significant source of noise within San Carlos. Highway 101, as the dominant traffic noise source and El Camino Real (State Route 82), a major contributor to the noise environment, exhibit noise levels from 70 to 77 dBA Ldn at land uses immediately joining these roadways. Interstate 280 carries high volumes of traffic but does not affect existing developed areas within the city. Major arterials, including Holly Street, San Carlos Avenue, Alameda de Las Pulgas, Brittan Avenue, Old Country Road and Edgewood Road are significant noise sources and exhibit noise levels from 65 to 70 dBA Ldn at nearby land uses. Neighborhood streets such as Crest- view Drive and Devonshire Boulevard exhibit noise levels from 60 to 65 dBA Ldn at nearby receivers. Residential neighborhoods insulated from through traffic have noise levels less than 60 dBA Ldn which is an acceptable level.

Railroad The Caltrain railway roughly parallels Highway 101 and follows El Camino Real in the northeastern portion of the city. The San Carlos Caltrain station is near the intersection of El Camino Real and San Carlos Avenue.

In 2009, there were 35 scheduled weekday northbound stops per day and 35 scheduled weekday southbound stops per day at the San Carlos Caltrain Station. Daynight average noise levels are estimated to range from 67 to 69 dBA Ldn at a distance of 100 feet from the tracks.

Train warning whistles can generate maximum noise levels of approximately 105 dBA at 100 feet and would be audible throughout the community. Trains are required to blow their horns at railroad stations, so Ldn noise levels in the station area will be substantially higher unless the City of San Carlos and Caltrain obtain Quiet Zone designations.

Trains are also a source of perceptible ground borne vibration within approximately 50 to 100 feet of the tracks. Ground-borne vibration occurs in areas adjacent to fixed rail lines when railroad trains pass through San Carlos. Ground vibration levels along the railroad corridors are proportional to the speed and weight of the trains as well as the condition of the tracks, train engine and car wheels. Vibration measurements conducted in San Carlos indicate that the acceptable vibration levels occur about 65 feet from the center of the near railroad track for the maximum measured train vibration level and about 55 feet from the center of the near railroad track for typical train passbys. 9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 267
Airport Aircraft using San Carlos Airport intermittently contribute to ambient noise levels in the city. This general aviation airport is located in the northeast portion of the City of San Carlos east of Highway 101. The airport averages about 425 aircraft operations per day. Approximately 49 percent of aircraft operations are local general aviation, 48 percent are transient general aviation, 2 percent are air taxi operations and less than 1 percent are military operations. San Mateo County and the San Carlos Airport Pilot’s Association promote noise reduction practices by airport users, including avoiding flying over sensitive areas. Existing noise contours for the San Carlos Airport are shown on Figure 9-2 (Revised October, 2024). Noise compatibility is regulated by the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) in its role as the Airport Land Use Commission for the County’s airports. The Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Carlos Airport (ALUCP)San Mateo County Comprehensive Airport/Land Use Plan (CLUP), adopted by C/CAG in 19962015, is a State-mandated document that promotes airport/land use compatibility. Table IV-24-3 of the CLUP ALUCP includes noise compatibility standards.

Aircraft noise in California is described in terms of the CNEL. The noise levels measured in CNEL are approximately equivalent to noise measured with the day/night average noise level (Ldn) but include an additional 5 dB weighting factor for the evening hours (7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.). Jet aircraft to and from the Mineta, San José and San Francisco International Airports generate intermittent noise when passing over the City of San Carlos. Noise generated by these over-flights, although audible and noticeable in quiet areas above other ambient noise sources, do not contribute to daily average noise levels in the city.

Non-Vehicular
There are no known stationary noise sources that make a significant contribution to the community’s noise environment. The majority of commercial and industrial land uses within San Carlos are located east-northeast of El Camino Real and may be minor contributors to 9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 267
9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 269
the noise environment, while Highway 101, major arterial roadways and the railroad contribute significantly. Future Noise The noise environment in San Carlos is not expected to change as a result of the implementation of the General Plan. Vehicular traffic noise, the dominant source throughout the city, is not anticipated to change substantially along local streets or major through routes, including Highway 101 and El Camino Real. Aircraft noise in the region and sources of non-transportation noise are similarly not anticipated to increase in the community. Figure 9-3 shows the projected noise contours at buildout of the General Plan. Currently, California is considering construction of a high-speed train system that would link the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles. The plan would be for high-speed trains to operate through San Carlos on or near the existing Caltrain right-of-way. Numerous atgrade crossings along the Caltrain corridor would need to be eliminated in order to facilitate the high speed trains, which would reduce noise from the sounding of railroad train horns. The high-speed trains would likely use electric power cars, which would eliminate the low frequency rumble associated with diesel-powered locomotives. However, overall highspeed train noise levels may increase over conventional trains due to the aerodynamic effects. Vibration of the ground caused by the passby of high-speed trains is expected to be similar to that caused by conventional steel wheels/steel rail trains. As information becomes available, it should be incorporated into the Noise Element and utilized accordingly in noise/ vibration and land use planning.

View of Downtown from San Carlos train station
9 NOISE ELEMENT
GENERAL PLAN 269
GENERAL PLAN 271
9 NOISE ELEMENT
Goals, Policies and Actions
GOAL
NOI-1
Encourage compatible noise environments for new development and control sources of excessive noise citywide.

POLICY NOI-1.1 Use the Noise and Land Compatibility
Standards shown in Figure 9-1, the noise level performance standards in Table 9-1 and the projected future noise contours for the General Plan shown in Figure 9-3 and detailed in Table 9-2, as a guide for future planning and development decisions.

Caltrain platform
POLICY NOI-1.2 Minimize noise impacts on noisesensitive land uses. Noise-sensitive land uses include residential uses, retirement homes, hotel/motels, schools, libraries, community centers, places of The Guiding Principles are a set of key objectives that articulate San Carlos’ core values relating to noise. The following Guiding Principle establishes a framework for the basic intent of this Element and is a broad statement of overall community value relating to noise in San Carlos:

Maintain a community with a noise environment that supports a high quality of life.

POLICIES
GENERAL PLAN 272
9 NOISE ELEMENT
Public assembly, daycare facilities, churches and hospitals.

POLICY NOI-1.3 Limit noise impacts on noise-sensitive
uses to noise level standards as indicated in Table 9-1.

POLICY NOI-1.4 Require a detailed acoustic report in all cases where noise-sensitive land uses are proposed in areas exposed to exterior noise levels of 60 CNEL Ldn or greater. If recommended in the report, mitigation measures shall be required as conditions of project approval.

POLICY NOI-1.5 New development of noise-sensitive land
uses proposed in noise-impacted areas shall incorporate effective mitigation measures into the project design to reduce exterior and interior noise levels to the following acceptable levels:
a. For new single-family residential
development, maintain a standard of 60 Ldn (day/night average noise level) for exterior noise in private use areas.
b. For new multi-family residential
development maintain a standard of 65 Ldn in community outdoor recreation areas. Noise standards are not applied to private decks and balconies and shall be considered on a case-by-case basis . c. Interior noise levels shall not exceed
45 Ldn in all new residential units
(single- and multi-family). Development sites exposed to noise levels exceeding 60 Ldn shall be analyzed following protocols in Appendix Chapter 12, Section 1208, A, Sound Transmission Control, 2001 Building Code Chapter 12, Appendix Section 1207.11.2 of the 2007 California Building Code (or the latest revision). d. Where new residential units (singleand multi-family) would be exposed to intermittent noise levels generated during train operations, maximum railroad noise levels in- GENERAL PLAN 273
9 NOISE ELEMENT
side homes shall not exceed 50 dBA in bedrooms or 55 dBA in other occupied spaces. These single event limits are only applicable where there are normally four or more train operations per day.

POLICY NOI-1.6 Where noise mitigation measures are
required to achieve the noise level standards, the emphasis of such measures shall be placed upon site planning and project design. The use of noise barriers shall be considered after practical design-related noise mitigation measures have been integrated into the project.

POLICY NOI-1.7 The City shall seek to reduce impacts
from ground-borne vibration associated with rail operations by requiring that vibration-sensitive buildings (e.g. residences) are sited at least 100 feet from the centerline of the railroad tracks whenever feasible. The development of vibration-sensitive buildings within 100 feet from the centerline of the rail-road tracks would require a study demonstrating that ground borne vibration issues associated with rail operations have been adequately addressed (i.e. through building siting, foundation design and construction techniques).

POLICY NOI-1.8 During all phases of construction
activity, reasonable noise reduction measures shall be utilized to minimize the exposure of neighboring properties to excessive noise levels. a. CAll construction activities shall comply
with the City’s noise ordinance.Development projects that require an acoustical study shall incorporate reasonable noise and vibration reduction measures and best management practices to minimize excessive noise levels during all phases of construction activity. Reduction measures and best management practices may include, but are not limited to, noise control techniques for construction tools and equipment, GENERAL PLAN 274
9 NOISE ELEMENT
construction site management techniques, temporary noise barriers, noise monitoring and reporting, and/or construction traffic management.POLICY NOI-1.9 Minimize potential transportationrelated noise through the use of setbacks, street circulation design, coordination of routing and other traffic control measures and the construction of noise barriers and consider use of “quiet” pavement surfaces when resurfacing roadways.

POLICY NOI-1.10 Ensure that mixed-use development
projects are designed to minimize noise impacts on residential units.

POLICY NOI-1.11 Ensure that proposed noise sensitive
land uses include appropriate mitigation to reduce noise impacts from air- craft operations at San Carlos Airport. Work with the San Carlos Airport Pilots Association and San Mateo County to continue to refine and implement the Airport’s noise abatement procedures.

POLICY NOI-1.12 Ensure consistency with the noise
compatibility policies and criteria contained in the San Carlos Airport Land Use
PlanComprehensive Airport Land
Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Carlos Airport.

POLICY NOI-1.13 Require a noise analysis for new
residential uses located within the 55 CNEL impact area of the San Carlos Airport. If recommended in the report, mitigation measures shall be required as conditions of project approval.

POLICY NOI-1.14 The Federal Transit Administration
vibration impact criteria and assessment methods shall be used to evaluate the compatibility of train vibration with proposed land uses adjoining the UPRR (Caltrain) corridor. Site specific vibration studies shall be completed for vibration-sensitive uses proposed within 100 feet of active railroad tracks.

GENERAL PLAN 275
9 NOISE ELEMENT
ACTION NOI-1.1 Establish a noise abatement protocol for existing sensitive land uses located in areas anticipated to experience significant noise increases with the implementation of the General Plan. Cumulative traffic noise impacts on existing noise-sensitive uses could be reduced through the inclusion of exterior and/or interior soundreduction measures such as set-backs, noise barriers, forced-air mechanical ventilation and sound rated window construction. The City should research sources of funding for these actions.

ACTION NOI-1.2 Revise the City’s Noise Ordinance to be
consistent with this Element.

ACTION NOI-1.3 Require residents of new mixed-use
developments to be informed of potential noise from refuse collection and other activities typically associated with commercial activity.

ACTION NOI-1.4 Require the evaluation of mitigation
measures for projects that would cause the following criteria to be exceeded or would cause a significant adverse community response: a. Cause the Ldn at noise-sensitive uses to increase by 3 dB or more and exceed the “normally acceptable” level. b. Cause the Ldn at noise-sensitive uses
to increase 5 dB or more and remain “normally acceptable.” c. Cause noise levels to exceed the
limits in Table 9-1.

ACTION NOI-1.5 Enforce Section 27007 of the California
Motor Vehicle Code that prohibits amplified sound that can be heard 50 or more feet from a vehicle.

ACTION NOI-1.6 Enforce Section 27150 of the California
Motor Vehicle Code that addresses excessive exhaust noise.

ACTIONS
GENERAL PLAN 276
9 NOISE ELEMENT
ACTION NOI-1.7 Update and review procedures for
dealing with noise complaints in the community.

ACTION NOI-1.8 Evaluate the necessity of requesting
Caltrain to establish a Quiet Zone designation for San Carlos.

General Plan Preparers
278 GENERAL PLAN
10 GENERAL PLAN PREPARERS
City Council, Planning Commission, and City Staff City Council Members Bob Grassilli, Mayor Randy Royce, Vice Mayor Omar Ahmad Matt Grocott Brad Lewis Planning Commission Members Steve Divney JoAnn Iwasa Steve San Filippo Alex Phillips Teri L.K. Shugart Key City Staff Al Savay, Community Development Director Deborah Nelson, Planning Manager Stephanie Bertollo Davis, Senior Planner Mark Sawicki, Economic Development, and Housing
Manager
General Plan Advisory Committee The General Plan Consultant team was assisted and advised by the City Council, Planning Commission, City Staff and the General Plan Advisory Committee. General Plan Advisory Committee Members Andrew Klein, West of El Camino Real Representative Chair Mary Jo Hoffman, Arts and Culture Commission Representative, Vice Chair Cecily Harris, Parks and Recreation Commission Representative Chris Burton, West of El Camino Real Representative Donald Cook, Open Position Jason Mansfield, Transportation and Circulation Commission Representative JoAnn Iwasa, Planning Commission Representative Kaveh Badiei, Housing Representative Kevin Harris, Youth Advisory Council Representative Martin Miller, Chamber of Commerce Representative Michelle Margiotta, Harbor Industrial Area Representative Scot Marsters, Economic Development Advisory Commission Representative GENERAL PLAN PREPARERS 10
Suzanne Henderson Emerson, Environmental Community Representative Thomas Knudsen, East Side Industrial Representative Pat Bell, East of El Camino Real Representative Report Preparers Design, Community & Environment, Inc. Primary Consultant 1625 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 300 Berkeley, CA 94709 Archaeological Resources Technology Cultural Resources Consultant 135 Valencia A408 San Francisco, CA 94103 Economics Research Associates Economics Consultant 388 Market Street, Suite 1580 San Francisco, Ca 94111 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Transportation Consultant 7888 Wren Avenue, Suite B-121 Gilroy, CA 95020 GENERAL PLAN 279
280 GENERAL PLAN
Illingworth & Rodkin Air Quality Consultant 505 Petaluma Boulevard South Petaluma, CA 94952 Stellar Environmental Solutions Geology and Hazards Consultant 2198 Sixth Street, Suite 201 Berkeley, CA 94710 Pacific Municipal Consultants Climate Action Plan 500 12th Street, Suite 240 Oakland, CA 94607 Appendices
Internationally Left Blank

A P P E N D I X A

H A Z A R D O U S M A T E R I A L S I T E S
................................................................................................................................................................................................

A-2 GENERAL PLAN

APPENDIX A
Site Name Address Database Listing(s) Affected Media
Stewart Alsop 115 Dale Avenue LUST, Cortese, HAZNET, San Mateo County Bl S/GW Claremont High School 1400 Alameda de Las Pulgas LUST Uk Shell Oil 500 El Camino Real LUST S/GW San Carlos Tire and Car Clinic 260 El Camino Real LUST, CA FID UST, SWEEPS UST, San Mateo County Bl S/GW Auto Pride Car Wash 195 El Camino Real LUST, RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET, Cortese, CA FID UST, San Mateo Co. Bl, SWEEPS UST GW The Lighthouse 734 El Camino Real LUST, SWEEPS UST S/GW/SV Unocal #293 90 El Camino Real LUST, HAZNET, Cortese, HIST UST, SWEEPS UST S/GW/SV Garden Supply 803 Old County Road LUST S/GW RMC-Reed Roofing 789 Old County Road LUST, San Mateo Bl Uk J. Wing Partners 939 Laurel Street LUST, SLIC, HAZNET, Cortese S/GW Nielsen’s Automotive, Inc. 888 El Camino Real LUST, RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET, Cortese, San Mateo Co. Bl, HIST UST, SWEEPS UST S/GW Carlos Cleaners 1000 Laurel Street LUST, HAZNET, SLIC, San Mateo Co. Bl, Drycleaners Uk Peninsula Laboratories 601 Taylor Way LUST, SLIC, San Mateo Co. Bl S/GW RMC Lonestar 1026 Bransten Road LUST GW Stop N’ Go 980 El Camino Real LUST, Cortese S/GW/SV Carey Property 580 Bragato Road LUST S/GW

SITES WITH ACTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION IN SAN CARLOS

APPENDIX A
Site Name Address Database Listing(s) Affected Media
Norman & Elaine Strom 1008 Bransten Road LUST, HAZNET, San Mateo Co. Bl Closure Pending BP Oil #11201 906 Holly Street LUST San Mateo Co. Bl GW Bragato Paving 535 Bragato Road LUST, HAZNET, San Mateo Co. Bl GW B&H Technical Ceramics 306 Industrial Boulevard LUST, Cortese GW Teigal Family Trust 495 Bragato Road LUST S/GW Delta Star 270 Industrial Road LUST, SLIC, HAZNET, Cortese, San Mateo Co. Bl, EMI Uk Shell Oil Co. 1098 El Camino Real LUST, RCRA-SQG, Cortese, San Mateo Co. Bl, SWEEPS UST S/GW Matagrano, Inc. 610 Quarry Road LUST, HAZNET S/GW/SV Olympian San Carlos 200 Industrial Boulevard LUST, San Mateo Co. Bl S/GW Liquid Carbonic Specialty Gas 767 Industrial Boulevard LUST, CA WDS Uk BFI Waste Systems 225 Shoreway Road LUST GW City of San Carlos 1113 Industrial Road LUST, HAZNET, Cortese GW State Plumbing Supply 1000 American Street LUST, Cortese, San Mateo Co. Bl GW Beco Inc. 620 Airport Drive LUST, HAZNET, San Mateo Co. Bl, CA WDS, SWEEPS UST Closure received Eaton Cleaners and Dyers 1752-4 Laurel Street LUST, SLIC S/GW/SV Goodyear #1693 290 El Camino Real SLIC S/GW GENERAL PLAN A-3

SITES WITH ACTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION IN SAN CARLOS A-4 GENERAL PLAN

APPENDIX A
Site Name Address Database Listing(s) Affected Media
G N Renn, Inc. 833 Old County Road SLIC, FINDS, EMI Uk Kelly More Paint Co. 919 Old Country Road SLIC, SWEEPS UST, HIST UST Uk Peninsula Laboratories, Inc. 901 Taylor Way SLIC, LUST, San Mateo Co. Bl S/GW Circuits Facility 641 Quarry Road SLIC, San Mateo Co. Bl. Uk Kelly More Paint Co. 1015 Commercial Street SLIC, RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET, CERC-NFRAP, HIST UST, FTTS, CA WDS, SWEEPS UST, HIST FTTS, San Mateo Co. Bl Uk Tiegel Manufacturing Co. 495 Bragato Road SLIC, San Mateo Co. Bl S/GW Spencer Kellogg Industries 952 Bransten Road SLIC GW 301 Industrial Way 301 Industrial Way SLIC, HAZNET, EMI SLiquid Carbonic Corp 767 Industrial Road SLIC, HAZNET, Cortese, San Mateo Co. Bl GW Litton Electron Devices 960 Industrial Boulevard SLIC, CHMIRS, CA WDS GW Appert Facility Harris Corp 850 Bransten Road SLIC, HIST UST Uk Home Depot 1000 Howard Street SLIC S

SITES WITH ACTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION IN SAN CARLOS

A P P E N D I X B

G L O S S A R Y A N D A C R O N Y M S
................................................................................................................................................................................................

B-2 GENERAL PLAN

APPENDIX B
This glossary explains the technical terms used in the City of San Carlos General Plan. Definitions come from several sources, including existing San Carlos codes, the California Office of Planning and Research and the American Planning Association Glossary of Zoning, Development and Planning Terms.

Glossary Acreage, Gross The land area that exists prior to any dedications for public use, health and safety purposes. Acreage, Net The portion of a site that can actually be built upon, which is the area remaining after dedication of ultimate rights-of-way for:
 Exterior boundary streets.  Flood ways.  Public parks and other open space developed to meet minimum standards required by City ordinance.
 Rights-of-way may not be counted as net acreage.

Action An action is a program, implementation measure, procedure, or technique intended to help to achieve a specified goal. (See “Goal”) Adverse Impact A negative consequence for the physical, social, or economic environment resulting from an action or project. Appropriate An act, condition, or state that is considered suitable. Archaeological Resource Material evidence of past human activity found below the surface of the ground or water, portions of which may be visible above the surface.

Arterials Major thoroughfares intended to serve as the major routes of travel within the city. Arterials are typically GENERAL PLAN B-3

APPENDIX B
larger roadways designed to gather traffic from the collector system and provide major connections between regional destinations, highway and freeway systems.

Bicycle Path (Class I facility) A paved route not on a street or roadway and expressly reserved for bicycles traversing an otherwise unpaved area. Bicycle paths may parallel roads but typically are separated from them by landscaping. Bicycle Lane (Class II facility) A corridor expressly reserved for bicycles, existing on a street or roadway in addition to any lanes for use by motorized vehicles. Bicycle Route (Class III facility) A facility shared with motorists and identified only by signs, a bicycle route has no pavement markings or lane stripes. Bikeways A term that encompasses bicycle lanes, bicycle paths and bicycle routes.

Best management practices Management practices (such as nutrient management) or structural practices (such as terraces) designed to reduce the quantities of pollutants -- such as sediment, nitrogen, phosphorus and animal wastes -- that are washed by rain and snow melt from farms.

CalVeg A classification system of ecological subregions used by the U.S. Forest Service. Capital Improvements Program A Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is administered by a City. A CIP schedules permanent improvements, usually for a minimum of five years in the future, to fit the projected fiscal capability of the local jurisdiction. The program generally is reviewed annually for conformance to and consistency with the General Plan. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) was passed in 1970, shortly after the Federal Government

APPENDIX B
B-4 GENERAL PLAN
passed the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Under CEQA, projects are reviewed for the purpose of evaluating potential environmental impacts of new development to the State.

City City with a capital “C” generally refers to the San Carlos city government or administration. City with a lower case “c” may mean any city or may refer to the geographical area of San Carlos (e.g. the city bikeway system). City Limit The legal boundaries of the geographical area subject to the jurisdiction of San Carlos’ City government. For example, development applications for properties located within the city limit are reviewed by the City. Collectors Intermediaries between arterials and local roads; collecting traffic from local roads and distributing it to the arterial system. Collector roadways also provide direct access to residential subdivisions as well as shopping centers and industrial complexes and should be spaced at quarter-mile to half-mile intervals.

Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) A 24-hour energy equivalent level derived from a variety of single-noise events, with weighting factors of 5 and 10 dBA applied to the evening (7 PM to 10 PM) and nighttime (10 PM to 7 AM) periods, respectively, to allow for the greater sensitivity to noise during these hours. Compatible Capable of existing together without conflict or ill effects. Conditional Use Permit The discretionary and conditional review of an activity, function or operation on a site or in a building or facility. Cul-de-sac A short street or alley with only a single means of ingress and egress at one end and with a large turnaround at its other end.

APPENDIX B
GENERAL PLAN B-5
Cultural Resources Includes historic, archaeological and paleontological resources, as well as human remains. dB Decibel; a unit used to express the relative intensity of a sound as it is heard by the human ear. The lowest volume a normal ear can detect under laboratory conditions is 0 dB, the threshold of human hearing. Since the decibel scale is logarithmic, 10 decibels are ten times more intense and 20 decibels are a hundred times more intense than 1 db. dBA The “A-weighted” scale for measuring sound in decibels; weighs or reduces the effects of low and high frequencies in order to simulate human hearing. Every increase of 10 dBA doubles the perceived loudness even though the noise is actually ten times more in- tense. Dedication The offer of land or easements for public use by an owner or developer of private land. Offers of dedication for roads, parks, school sites, or other public uses often are made conditions of approval of development by a city or county.

Dedication, In lieu of Cash payments that may be required of an owner or developer as a substitute for a dedication of land, usually calculated in dollars per unit measurement of land and referred to as in lieu fees or in lieu contributions. Density The amount of development on a property. (See also “Density, Residential” and “Floor Area Ratio”) Density, Residential The number of permanent residential dwelling units per acre of land. Densities specified in the General Plan are expressed in dwelling units per gross acre. (See “Acres, Gross”) Development The physical extension and/or construction of land uses. Development activities may include: subdivision of land; construction or alteration of structures, roads,

APPENDIX B
B-6 GENERAL PLAN
utilities and other facilities; grading; deposit of refuse, debris, or fill materials; and clearing of natural vegetative cover.

Downtown The Downtown is generally defined as Laurel Street from Holly Street to Arroyo Street, including properties west to Walnut Street and the Civic Center. Dwelling Unit The place of customary abode of a person or household which is either considered to be real property under State law or cannot be easily moved. Element California State Government Code Section 65302 requires each General Plan to contain seven separate “elements” that set goals, policies and actions for each mandated subject. Topics can sometimes be combined or included into other elements, as allowed by State law. Other elements are optional.

Environmental Impact Report (EIR) A report required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that assesses all the environmental characteristics of an area, determines what effects or impacts will result if the area is altered or disturbed by a proposed action, and identifies alternatives or other measures to avoid or reduce those im- pacts. (See “California Environmental Quality Act”) Fault A fracture in the earth’s crust that forms a boundary between rock masses that have shifted. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) The size of a building in square feet (gross floor area) divided by net land area, expressed as a decimal number. For example, a 60,000 square foot building on a 120,000 square-foot parcel would have a floor area ratio of 0.50. The FAR generally is used in calculating the building intensity of non-residential development. Form Based Ordinance Document regulating development to achieve a specific urban form by controlling physical form, with a

APPENDIX B
GENERAL PLAN B-7
lesser focus on land use regulations presented in both diagrams and words, keyed to a regulating plan that designates the appropriate form and scale of development. It addresses the relationship between building facades and the public realm, the form and mass of buildings in relation to one another and the scale and types of streets and blocks.

Floodplain, (100-year)
The area which has a one percent chance of being inundated during any particular 12-month period. The risk of this area being flooded in any century is 1 percent, but statistically, the risk is almost 40 percent in a 50-year period.

Gateway An area located where a major street meets the city limit. It is a point along a roadway at which a pedestrian, motorist or cyclist gains a sense of having entered the city. General Plan A compendium of City policies regarding its long-term development, in the form of maps and accompanying text. The General Plan is a legal document required of each local agency by the State of California Government Code Section 65301 and adopted by the City Council. In California, the General Plan has seven mandatory elements (Circulation, Conservation, Housing, Land Use, Noise, Open Space, Public Safety) and may include any number of optional elements.

Goal A description of the general desired results that San Carlos seeks to create through the implementation of the General Plan. Goals are included in each element of the Plan and may include the key physical or community characteristics that the City and its residents wish to maintain or develop. Groundwater Water that exists beneath the earth’s surface, typically found between saturated soils and rock and is used to supply wells and springs. Habitat The physical location or type of environment in which an organism or biological population lives or occurs.

APPENDIX B
B-8 GENERAL PLAN
Household All persons occupying a single dwelling unit.

Impact Fee A fee charged to a developer by the City specific to the proposed development project, typically by number of units, square footage or acreage. The fee is often used to offset costs incurred by the municipality for infrastructure such as schools, roads, wastewater facilities, police and fire services and parks. Implementation Actions, procedures, programs, or techniques that carry out policies. Infill Development Development that occurs on vacant or underutilized land within areas that are already largely developed. Landmark Site Sites designated General Commercial/Industrial adjacent to Holly Street and Industrial Road are considered Landmark Sites with high visibility and uses drawing from a regional market-base are encouraged.

Land Use The occupation or utilization of an area of land for any human activity or purpose.

Land Use Designation One specific category in a classification series of appropriate use of properties. A designation has an associated list of applied land use and management policies. Level of Service Standard A standard used by government agencies to measure the quality or effectiveness of a municipal service, such as police, fire, or library, or the performance of a facility, such as a street or highway. Level of Service (LOS) for Traffic A scale that measures the amount of traffic that a roadway or intersection can accommodate, based on such factors as maneuverability, driver dissatisfaction and delay.

APPENDIX B
GENERAL PLAN B-9
LOS A A relatively free flow of traffic, with little or no limitation on vehicle movement or speed.

LOS B Describes a steady flow of traffic, with only slight delays in vehicle movement and speed. LOS C Denotes a reasonably steady, high-volume flow of traffic, with some limitations on movement and speed and occasional backups on critical approaches. LOS D Designates the level where traffic nears an unstable flow. Intersections still function, but short queues develop and cars may have to wait through one cycle during short peaks. LOS E Represents traffic characterized by slow movement and frequent stoppages. This level of service is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay.

LOS F Describes unsatisfactory stop-and-go traffic characterized by "traffic jams" and stoppages of long duration.

Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) A five- or seven-member commission within San Mateo County that reviews and evaluates all proposals for formation of special districts, incorporation of cities, annexation to special districts or cities, consolidation of districts and merger of districts with cities. San Mateo County’s LAFCo is empowered to approve, disapprove or conditionally approve such proposals. Local Street Provides direct access to properties and connects travelers to collectors and arterials. Manufactured Housing Residential structures that are constructed entirely in the factory, and that since June 15, 1976, have been regulated by the federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 under the administration of HUD.

APPENDIX B
B-10 GENERAL PLAN
Mobile Home A structure, transportable in one or more sections, built on a permanent chassis and designed for use as a singlefamily dwelling unit.

Modular Unit A factory-fabricated, transportable building or major component designed for use by itself or for incorporation with similar units onsite into a structure for residential, commercial, educational, or industrial use. The modular unit differs from mobile homes and manufactured housing by (in addition to lacking an integral chassis or permanent hitch to allow future movement) being subject to California housing law design standards. California standards are more restrictive than federal standards in some respects (e.g. plumbing and energy conservation). Also called Factory Built Housing. Mobile Home Park A parcel of land under one ownership that has been planned and improved for the placement of two or more mobile homes for rental purposes for non- transient use.

Mixed Use Any mixture of land uses, including mixtures of residences with commercial, offices with retail, or visitor accommodation with offices and retail. As distinguished from a single use land use designation or zone, mixed use refers to an authorized variety of uses for buildings and structures in a particular area.

Parcel A lot, or contiguous group of lots, in single ownership or under single control, usually considered a unit for purposes of development. Pedestrian-Oriented DesignAn approach to architectural design intended to facilitate movement on foot in an area, as opposed to design that primarily serves automobile movement. Examples of pedestrian-oriented design include pathways following the most direct route from sidewalk to front door, continuous building street walls with shop windows, outdoor cafes, street trees and benches and with architectural enhancement in the first two floors that are at human scale.

APPENDIX B
GENERAL PLAN B-11
Planning Area The Planning Area is the land area addressed by the General Plan. The Planning Area does not lead to regulatory powers outside of the city limit. During the General Plan Update process, the City identified distinctive areas that have the greatest potential to experience land use changes and have specific policies and programs targeted towards them. The unincorporated land within the City of San Carlos will remain under the jurisdiction of the County of San Mateo unless annexed to the City. (See also Sphere of Influence) Policy A specific statement of principle or of guiding actions that implies clear commitment but is not mandatory. A general direction that a governmental agency sets to follow, in order to meet its goals and objectives before undertaking an implementing action or program. (See "Action") Sensitive Receptors Uses sensitive to noise, odor and particulate matter such as residential areas, hospitals, convalescent homes and facilities and schools.

Specific Plan Under Article 8 of the Government Code (Section 65450 et seq), a legal tool for detailed design and implementation of a defined portion of the area covered by a General Plan. A Specific Plan may include all detailed regulations, conditions, programs and/or proposed legislation which may be necessary or convenient for the systematic implementation of any General Plan element(s).

Sphere of Influence Under State law, the term used for the area outside of the city limit which plans for the probable physical boundaries and service area of a local agency, as determined by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). (See also Planning Area) Traffic Calming Measures designed to reduce motor vehicle speeds and to encourage pedestrian use, including:
 narrow streets,  tight turning radii,  sidewalk bulbouts,

APPENDIX B
B-12 GENERAL PLAN
 parking bays,  textured paving at intersections, and  parkways between sidewalks and streets.

Unincorporated Area
Encompasses properties that are located outside of cities. Development in the unincorporated area is subject to County jurisdiction.

Use The purpose for which a lot or structure is or may be leased, occupied, maintained, arranged, designed, intended, constructed, erected, moved, altered and/or enlarged in accordance with the City zoning ordinance and General Plan land use designations. Vehicle Miles Traveled The sum of distances traveled by all motor vehicles in a specified system of highways for a given period of time. Wastewater Water that has already been used for washing, flushing, or in a manufacturing process and therefore contains waste products such as sewage or chemical byproducts.

Watershed The land area extending from the topographic high points where water collects, such as ridges, down to the topographic low point where the area drains into a creek, river, bay, ocean, or other waterbody. Zoning The division of a City by ordinance or other legislative regulation into districts, or zones, which specify allowable uses for real property and size restrictions for buildings constructed in these areas; a program that implements the land use policies of the General Plan. Zoning District A designated area of the City for which prescribed land use requirements and building and development standards are or will be established.

Acronyms
ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ADT average daily traffic

APPENDIX B
GENERAL PLAN B-13
AERA Avigation Easement Review Area AYSO American Youth Soccer Organization BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BART Bay Area Rapid Transit BMP best management practices B-PAC Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
C/CAG City/County Association of
Governments
CAA Clean Air Act CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality
Standards
CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and
Fire Protection
CAP Climate Action Plan CARB California Air Resources Board CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CLUP San Mateo Co. Comprehensive Airport/Land Use Compatibility Plan CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CO carbon monoxide CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent Db decibel dBA A-weighted decibels DPM diesel particulate matter DTSC California EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control
EIR Environmental Impact Report EOC Emergency Operations Center EPA US Environmental Protection Agency FAR floor area ratio FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
GHG greenhouse gas GPAC General Plan Advisory Committee IPM integrated pest management LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission Ldn day-night average sound level LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Leq equivalent sound level Lmax maximum sound level
LOS level of service MGD million gallons per day

APPENDIX B
B-14 GENERAL PLAN
MPROSD Midpeninsula Regional Open Space
District
MTBE Methyl-tert-buytl-ether
MTZ mutual threat zone Mw Moment magnitude NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NFPA National Fire Protection Association ng/m3 nanograms per cubic meter NIMS National Incident Management System OES Office of Emergency Services ONC Office of Noise Control PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon PCB polychlorinated biphenyls PDA priority development area PM10 particulate matter of 10 micrometers or less in size
PM2.5 particulate matter of 2.5 micrometers or
less in size
Ppb parts per billion SBSA South Bayside System Authority SBWMA South Bayside Waste Management Authority
SEMS Standardized Emergency Management
System
SOI sphere of influence SRDC Shoreway Recycling and Disposal Center
SSO sanitary sewer overflow TAC toxic air contaminant TDM transportation demand measures ug/m3 micrograms per cubic meter USDA United States Department of
Agriculture
USGS United States Geological Survey V/C volume to capacity ratio VHFSZ very high fire severity zone VMT Vehicle miles traveled VTA Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Exhibit B
City of San Carlos
2045 General Plan Reset Project
General Plan Amendments - Glossary of Page References
i: Cover; ii: List of Figures; iii: List of Tables; iv: Land Acknowledgement Chapter 1: Introduction
Pages 3, 4, 10, 11, 14,
Chapter 3: Land Use Element
Pages 22, 25, 27, 28, 33, 34, 36, 38, 46, 47, 50, 53, 54, 57, 58, 59, 60, 66, 69, 80, 81 Chapter 5: Circulation and Scenic Highways Element
Pages 90, 91, 99, 100, 101, 103
Chapter 6: Environmental Management Element
Pages 121, 122,129, 130, 143
Chapter 7: Parks and Recreation Element
Pages 172, 175
Chapter 9: Noise Element
Pages 267, 273, 274

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1757
1 EXHIBIT C
City of San Carlos
2045 General Plan Reset Project
Summary of Proposed Policy and Action Items Amendments
This document presents proposed amendments to the San Carlos 2030 General Plan.

Underlined text represents language that has been added to the General Plan; text with strikethrough has been deleted from the General Plan. This document focuses on nonformatting changes to the policies and actions of the General Plan and does not include changes to the General Plan format, background information, or narrative language.

Chapter 3 – Land Use Element
• Action LU-1.1: Continue to evaluate the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance to encourage mode shift Amend the Zoning Ordinance to create a Transportation Demand Management Ordinance that contains strategies to enhance travel patterns and to reduce vehicular trip generation from new development by 20 percent. • Policy LU-4.3: Annexation of undeveloped parcels shall be in substantial compliance with the following criteria:
a. The parcels are contiguous to parcels located in the City of San Carlos and contiguous or provisions have been made to become contiguous to city streets. b. Require minimum lot size in hillside areas considered for subdivision or annexation to be larger than lots on flat areas to minimize slope instability, erosion and drainage impacts.

Lots shall meet, or shall be merged to meet, the minimum lot size established in the subdivision ordinance.
c. Parcels with development potential of five or more lots shall cluster single-family detached homes utilizing the Planned Community PC zone to the degree feasible. In such cases the density may not exceed the density permitted by the lot size standards of the San Carlos Subdivision Ordinance. Further, the provisions related to portions of the development which must remain ungraded shall apply. Only the lot size requirements may vary. In such cases, the minimum lot size shall be 10,000 square feet. • Policy LU-4.6 Parcels proposed for annexation to the City shall be prezoned. a. Undeveloped Residential Parcels. Parcels with development potential of five or more lots shall be zoned to Planned Community (with minimum R-1-LD Development Standards) Development with minimum RS-3 development standards prior to approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map.

Parcels with development potential of less than five lots shall be prezoned RS-3. b. Other parcels proposed for annexation shall be prezoned R-1-LD Low- Density, SingleFamily Residential District. Developed residential parcels and parcels with development potential for nonresidential use shall be prezoned consistent with surrounding and/or like zoning district classifications which represent uses intended for the property.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1758
2045 General Plan Reset: Proposed General Plan Amendments 2 • Policy LU-5.16: Identify, develop and implement Redevelopment Agency sponsored programs and other public/private partnership developments to help facilitate economic development.
• Action LU-6.5: Continue to implement the East Side Innovation District Vision Plan adopted on October 25, 2021 (Resolution 2021-107).
• Policy LU-5.17: Encourage the development as well as improvements to the ingress and egress on the following public parking lots plazas: South Plaza, Williams Plaza, Wheeler Plaza and Clark Plaza. Encourage the consolidation and acquisition of parcels when opportunities become available to expand the public parking lots plazas, provide improved ingress and egress and improve the efficiency of design. • Action LU-7.1: Continue to implement the City's adopted Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan adopted on June 9th, 2020 and update the Master Plan as needed. Prepare a community study to seek new ways to enhance walkability and connect all areas of the community. The current Bicycle Transportation Plan could be expanded to be a Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan.
• Policy LU-8.19: Residential structures shall be de- signed to be compatible with existing structures in the vicinity, avoid obstructing views from adjacent structures or views of community importance, avoid interference with the right or ability to use solar energy and be consistent with the Objective Design Standards community design principles. • Policy LU-12.1: Evaluate historical, cultural, and tribal cultural resources early in the development review process through consultation with interested parties. • Action LU-12.1: Ensure thorough compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) relating to potential impacts to cultural, and historical, and tribal cultural resources.
• Action LU-12.6: The City of San Carlos shall develop mapping to indicate areas in the City with archaeological sensitivity and guidance documentation for public and private construction projects that involve ground disturbance activities in areas with archaeological sensitivity. The requirements may include 1) an archeological records search, 2) construction training for cultural sensitivity, and 3) procedures if archaeologic resources are discovered.

Chapter 5 – Circulation and Scenic Highways Element
• Policy CSH-3.1: Strive to reduce baseline and development-related traffic by implementing and enforcing the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance 20 percent through public-private partnership efforts.
• Policy CSH-3.3: Support the incorporation of Transportation Demand Management measures in new development to reduce traffic impacts.
• Policy CSH-3.7: Public sidewalks and walkways shall be designed to accommodate access in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and including any other applicable State and federal laws, regulations and guidelines, and shall be kept clear of obstruction.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1759
2045 General Plan Reset: Proposed General Plan Amendments 3 • Policy CSH-3.8 The City shall strive to maintain intersection continue to evaluate service levels above the mid- range of level D (not to exceed a Volume- to-Capacity Ratio (V/C) of .85 or a total average delay time at intersections of 45 seconds whenever V/C Ratio is not available) metrics as provided by the City’s Transportation Impact Analysis (or Transportation Study) Guidelines as adopted November 12, 2024, Resolution 2024-118. The City recognizes that certain development project(s) may cause this level of service goal these thresholds to be exceeded. The City may approve such development project(s) if specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits outweigh the adverse effects of exceeding the mid-range level D goal thresholds as set forth in the Transportation Study Guidelines.
• Action CSH-3.2: The City shall consider adoption of a Transportation Impact Fee for new development to support city-wide Transportation Demand Management measures. • Policy CSH-4.2: Reduce potential conflicts, safety hazards and physical obstacles between bicyclists, automobiles and pedestrians and ensure compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and including any other applicable State and federal laws, regulations and guidelines.

Chapter 6 – Environmental Management
• Policy EM-1.1: Ensure that potential impacts to biological resources and sensitive habitat are carefully evaluated when considering development project applications through the preparation of a biological resources assessment by a qualified biologist. Require such biological resource assessments as part of project approval for proposed development on sites that may support special-status plant and animal species, sensitive natural communities, important wildlife corridors, riparian habitat, or regulated wetlands and waters. • Action EM-1.5: Require that major new buildings and taller structures that extend above the existing surrounding urban fabric and height of the tree canopy be designed to minimize the potential risk of bird collisions using input from the latest bird-safe design guidelines and best management practice strategies to reduce bird strikes. • Action EM-7.3: Update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) every five years, including but not limited to:
a. A revised greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory;
b. An overview of new knowledge of the causes and anticipated impacts of climate change; c. Collaborate with stakeholders and volunteers to assist in the preparation and implementation of the effective CAP.
d. An assessment of the appropriateness and adequacy of San Carlos’ GHG reduction target;
e. A summary of the quantified cost per metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent reduced per emission reduction measure;
f. An evaluation of the effectiveness of existing programs; and

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1760
2045 General Plan Reset: Proposed General Plan Amendments 4 g. Considerations for the use of low-carbon and sustainable materials to reduce embodied carbon in construction and to meet GHG reduction target(s); and hg. Modifications to goals, policies and strategies as needed to achieve the GHG reduction target.

Chapter 7 – Parks and Recreation
• Policy PR-2.3: Continue to support implementation of trail connections as identified in the City’s Master Plan for Parks, Open Space, Buildings and other Recreation Facilities Potential Trail Connections Plan.
• Policy PR-3.7: Protect the Youth Center as a valuable venue exclusively for giving priority to youth activities and programs as subject to the terms in the Youth Center Use Policy adopted by City Council.

Chapter 9 – Noise
• Policy NOI-1.8: During all phases of construction activity, reasonable noise reduction measures shall be utilized to minimize the exposure of neighboring properties to excessive noise levels.
a. Construction All construction activities shall comply with the City’s noise ordinance.

Development projects that require an acoustical study shall incorporate reasonable noise and vibration reduction measures and best management practices to minimize excessive noise levels during all phases of construction activity. Reduction measures and best management practices may include, but are not limited to, noise control techniques for construction tools and equipment, construction site management techniques, temporary noise barriers, noise monitoring and reporting, and/or construction traffic management. • Policy NOI-1.12: Ensure consistency with the noise compatibility policies and criteria contained in the San Carlos Airport Land Use Plan Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Carlos Airport.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1761

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1762

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1763

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1764

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1765

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1766

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1767

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1768

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1769

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1770

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1771

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1772

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1773

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1774

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1775

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1776

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1777

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1778

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1779

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1780

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1781

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1782

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1783

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1784

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1785

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1786

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1787
RESOLUTION NO. PTC2025-06

RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

SAN CARLOS RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AMENDMENTS TO THE 2030 CITY OF SAN CARLOS GENERAL PLAN’S INTRODUCTION, LAND USE ELEMENT,

CIRCULATION AND SCENIC HIGHWAYS ELEMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

ELEMENT, PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT, AND NOISE ELEMENT AS PART OF THE 2045

GENERAL PLAN RESET PROJECT.

WHEREAS, in July 2023 the City Council of the City of San Carlos approved a Professional Services Agreement with PlaceWorks for consulting services to prepare an update to the 2030 General Plan and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), altogether referred to as the “2045 General Plan Reset Project”, to reset the development projections to the year 2045 for citywide commercial, office, industrial and residential uses in response to the continued development interest in the City’s East side and two new Specific Plans underway in the City; and
WHEREAS, the San Carlos 2045 General Plan Reset project includes these interrelated documents: the San Carlos 2030 General Plan with proposed amendments to the Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and. Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element; and associated Draft EIR and Final EIR which together constitute the EIR for the project; and WHEREAS, the focus of this resolution relates to amendments to the San Carlos General Plan’s Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element; and WHEREAS, the City prepared the revised development projections to the year 2045 to inform the General Plan update and on June 3, 2024 released a Notice of Preparation of EIR and solicited public input from June 3, 2024, to July 3, 2024 on the scope of EIR; and WHEREAS, the City conducted stakeholder group meetings between September 2024 and October 2024 to solicit input on the project; and
WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan amendments to the Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element and the Draft EIR was prepared for the proposed 2045 General Plan Reset Project and circulated for a 45-day public review from January 17, 2025, to March 3, 2025 to solicit agency and public input on the analysis of the potential environmental effects associated with the implementation of the project and amendments to the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on February 3, 2025, the City conducted a Public Hearing at the Planning and Transportation Commission’s regular meeting to present the proposed General Plan amendments and findings of Draft EIR and solicit input from the public and Planning and Transportation Commission on the project; and
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2025, the City Council held a Study Session to review the proposed General Plan amendments to the Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1788
Element, and Noise Element and provided comments to the staff; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Government Code Section 65300 et seq., the amendments made to the Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element have been developed to be comprehensive, internally consistent, long-term, and to address State law requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Carlos referred the proposed amendments to the Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element to all California Native American tribes on the contact list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission and to other entities listed; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Transportation Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the San Carlos 2045 General Plan Reset project on May 5, 2025 to consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the amendments to the Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, the Planning and Transportation Commission has recommended that the City Council certify the 2045 General Plan Reset EIR as adequate and complete in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and as adequate and complete for consideration in making a decision on the merits of amendments to the 2030 City of San Carlos’ General Plan’s Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element; and further recommends to the City Council that based on the findings set forth in the PTC Resolution 2025- __ adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION THAT:

1. Findings
a. The above recitals are incorporated by reference.
b. The amendments to the 2030 City of San Carlos’ General Plan’s Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element, and uphold the 2009 San Carlos General Plan as a comprehensive, long-term document capable of guiding the future development of the City.
c. The amendments to the 2030 City of San Carlos’ General Plan’s Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element meets all the requirements for such plans as contained in the Planning and Zoning Law (Government Code, sections 65300-65303.4) and other laws.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1789

2. Adoption
a. The Planning and Transportation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the amendments to the 2030 City of San Carlos’ General Plan’s Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element as set forth in Exhibit A. A glossary of page references of amendments is included in Exhibit B and a summary of policy and action item amendments is included in Exhibit C.

Passed and adopted as Resolution of the Planning and Transportation Commission of the City of San Carlos at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5'" day of May, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEMBERS: Anand, Bundy.

Castaneda, Garvey, Clements
NOES, PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEMBERS: None ABSENT, PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMBERS: None CHAIR, Planning and Transportation Commission

ATTEST:
(ule Wrdkes sil
Assistant Community Development Director of the City of San Carlos

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1790

EXHIBIT A
City of San Carlos
2045 General Plan Reset Project
Amendments to the City of San Carlos’ 2030 General Plan’s Introduction, Land Use, Circulation and Scenic Highways, Environmental Management, Parks and Recreation, and Noise Elements
Found at the following site:
www.cityofsancarlos.org/2045GeneralPlanReset:

The following document contains the 2030 General Plan with tracked amendments - 2030 General Plan Proposed Amendments

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1791
Exhibit B
City of San Carlos
2045 General Plan Reset Project
General Plan Amendments - Glossary of Page References
i: Cover; ii: List of Figures; iii: List of Tables; iv: Land Acknowledgement Chapter 1: Introduction
Pages 3, 4, 10, 11, 14,
Chapter 3: Land Use Element
Pages 22, 25, 27, 28, 33, 34, 36, 38, 46, 47, 50, 53, 54, 57, 58, 59, 60, 66, 69, 80, 81 Chapter 5: Circulation and Scenic Highways Element
Pages 90, 91, 99, 100, 101, 103
Chapter 6: Environmental Management Element
Pages 121, 122,129, 130, 143
Chapter 7: Parks and Recreation Element
Pages 172, 175
Chapter 9: Noise Element
Pages 267, 273, 274

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1792

EXHIBIT C
City of San Carlos
2045 General Plan Reset Project
Summary of Proposed Policy and Action Items Amendments
This document presents proposed amendments to the San Carlos 2030 General Plan.

Chapter 3 - Land Use Element
e Action LU-1.1: Continue to ev: aluate the Lransnortation B man Mans ment Ordinance t

vehicular trip generation from n new .w development by 20 percent e Policy LU-4.3: Annexation of undeveloped parcels shall be in substantial compliance with the following criteria:
a.
b.

The parcels are contiguous to parcels located in the City of San Carlos and contiguous or provisions have been made to become contiguous to city streets.

Require minimum lot size in hillside areas considered for subdivision or annexation to be larger than lots on flat areas to minimize slope instability, erosion and drainage impacts.

Lots shall meet, or shall be merged to meet, the minimum lot size established in the subdivision ordinance.

Parcels with development potential of five or more lots shall cluster single-family detached homes utilizing Community the Planned RCzene to the degree feasible. In such cases the density may not exceed the density permitted by the lot size standards of the San Carlos Subdivision Ordinance. Further, the provisions related to portions of the development which must remain ungraded shall apply. Only the lot size requirements may vary. In such cases, the minimum lot size shall be 10,000 square feet. e Policy LU-4.6 Parcels proposed for annexation to the City shall be prezoned.

Undeveloped Residential Parcels. Parcels with development potential of five or more lots shall be zoned to Planned Gormmaunit-avith minimum R-+LD Development Standards) Development with minimum RS-3 development standards prior to approval of a Tentative subalvision Map.
a.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1793
2045 General Plan Reset: Proposed General Plan Amendments e Policy LU-5.16: Identify, develop and implement Redevelopment Agency sponsored programs and other public/private partnership developments to help facilitate economic development.

Action LU-6,5: Conti imol East Si ion District Vision P opted on October 25, 2021 (Resolution 2021-107).
e Policy LU-5.17: Encourage the development as well as improvements to the ingress and egress on the following public parking lots plazas: South Plaza, Williams Plaza, Wheeler Plaza and Clark Plaza. Encourage the consolidation and acquisition of parcels when opportunities become available to expand the public parking lots plazas, provide improved ingress and egress and improve the efficiency of design. ° Action LU-7.1: Continue to implement the-City’s-adopted Bicycle-and Petestian Master

e Policy LU-8.19: Residential structures shall be de- signed to be compatible with existing structures in the vicinity, avoid obstructing views from adjacent structures or views of community importance, avoid interference with the right or ability to use solar energy and be consistent with the Objective Design Standards ceramunity-design-principles. e Policy LU-12.1: Evaluate historical, cultural, and tribal cultural resources early in the development review process through consultation with interested parties. e Action LU-12.1: Ensure thorough compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) relating to potential impacts to cultural, and historical, and tribal cultural resources.

Action LU-12.

sensitivity Ther feaulrementa ima wwinclude i) an nehotlalcus each 2) raini ral itivi r
discovered.

Chapter 5 — Circulation and Scenic Highways Element
e Policy CSH- 3.1: Strive to reduce beseme and development rented traffic by implementing

e Policy CSH-3.3: Support the incorporation of Transportation Demand Management measures in new development to reduce traffic impacts.
e Policy CSH-3.7: Public sidewalks and walkways shall be designed to accommodate access in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act_and including any other applicable State and federal laws, regulations and guidelines, and shall be kept clear of obstruction.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1794
2045 General Plan Reset: Proposed General Plan Amendments Policy CSH-3.8 ihe City shall Seo einen ee continue to evaluate service

Transportation Study} Guidelines as adopted November 12, 2024, Resolution 2024-118. The City recognizes that certain development project(s) may cause thistevelofservice-geal these thresholds to be exceeded. The City may approve such development project(s) if specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits outweigh the adverse effects, Action CSH-3.2: The City shall consider adoption of a Transportation Impact Fee for new development to support city-wide Transportation Demand Management measures.

Policy CSH-4.2: Reduce potential conflicts, safety hazards and physical obstacles between bicyclists, automobiles and pedestrians and ensure compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Ac’
guidelines.

Chapter 6 — Environmental Management
Policy EM-1.1: Ensure that potential impacts to biological resources and sensitive habitat

are ae evaluated nen ee Sin Ln project epee. through the

Action EM-7.3: Update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) every five years, including but not limited to:
a. Arevised greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory;
b. An overview of new knowledge of the causes and anticipated impacts of climate change; c. Collaborate with stakeholders and volunteers to assist in the preparation and implementation of the effective CAP.
d. An assessment of the appropriateness and adequacy of San Carlos’ GHG reduction target;
e. Asummary of the quantified cost per metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent reduced per emission reduction measure;
f. An evaluation of the effectiveness of existing programs; and

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1795
2045 General Plan Reset: Proposed General Plan Amendments g. Considerations for the use of low-carbon and sustainable materials to reduce embodied = : GHG : et(s); anc hg. Modifications to goals, policies and strategies as needed to achieve the GHG reduction target.

Chapter 7 — Parks and Recreation
e Policy PR-2.3: Continue to support implementation of trail connections as identifi ied in the

e Policy PR-3.7: Protect the Youth Center as a valuable venue exclusively for giving priority to youth activities and programs as subject to the terms in the Youth Center Use Policy adopted by City Council.

Chapter 9 — Noise
o

e Policy NOI-1.12: Ensure consistency with the noise compatibility policies and criteria container M the San Carlos Mrport Lane Ween Comprehensive Airport Land Use Col Plan Envir ; Airport.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1796
May 5, 2025 1
Attachment 5
Notes from Planning and Transportation Commission meeting of May 5, 2025 On May 5th, a Public Hearing was conducted on the Proposed General Plan Amendments and Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for consideration of making a recommendation to the City Council on certification of the EIR and adoption of the 2045 General Plan Reset Project.

Akanksha Chopra, Senior Management Analyst, Steve Noack, Principal at PlaceWorks and Alexis Mena, Associate Principal at PlaceWorks presented the item and responded to commissioners’ questions.

The Commissioners provided the following feedback and guidance to staff:
• Supported the project and appreciated the thoroughness of the plan. • Acknowledged the identified significant and unavoidable impacts outlined in the report and appreciated the transparency. Emphasized that such openness goes a long way in building community trust.
• Encouraged to provide as much supplemental material as possible for public review, which would help alleviate community concerns.
• Appreciated the responsiveness to agency and public comments.

The meeting closed with the Commission adopting the following resolutions –

1. Resolution recommending the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report for the City of San Carlos 2045 General Plan Reset project.

2. Resolution recommending the City Council adopt amendments to the 2030 City of San Carlos General Plan’s Introduction, Land Use Element, Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Environmental Management Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Noise Element as part of the 2045 General Plan Reset project.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1797
May 5, 2025 1
Attachment 6
Summary of February 24, 2025 City Council Study Session on Draft Environmental Impact Report and proposed General Plan Amendments
The City conducted a Study Session for the City Council on Monday, February 24, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. for the 2045 General Plan Reset project. The Study Session focused on proposed General Plan amendments and findings of Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) which was released on January 17, 2025 for a 45-day public comment period until March 3, 2025. The meeting was held at the City Hall’s Council Chambers at 600 Elm Street, San Carlos, CA 94070. This meeting was conducted both in person at City Hall and virtually via Zoom.
• Meeting Materials and Recording (The Study Session Item starts at 1:25:00) • Meeting Minutes

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1798

MARKET DEMAND STUDY
2024-2045
Prepared for the City of San Carlos
August 2024

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1799
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3

1. Purpose and Forecast Approach................................................................................... 7 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 7 Approach ........................................................................................................................ 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 8 Assumptions ................................................................................................................... 9 Research and Development.............................................................................................................. 9 Office ............................................................................................................................................ 11 Industrial....................................................................................................................................... 13 Commercial................................................................................................................................... 15 Residential .................................................................................................................................... 17 Limitations .................................................................................................................... 18

2. Market Demand Forecast............................................................................................... 19 Research and Development ........................................................................................... 19 Office............................................................................................................................ 20 Industrial ...................................................................................................................... 20 Commercial .................................................................................................................. 21 Residential.................................................................................................................... 21 Jobs-Housing Balance.................................................................................................... 22

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1800
3 Executive Summary
This Market Demand Study (“Study”) was prepared by RSG to assist the City of San Carlos (“City”) with making informed decisions on the land use development projections for the City’s General Plan through the year 2045.

Findings
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (“MTC”) and Association of Bay Area Governments (“ABAG”) prepared the Plan Bay Area 2050 report, a 30-year long-range plan projecting household, population, and job growth throughout the nine-county Bay Area region for the purpose of developing strategies for growing housing inventory, economic activity, transportation, and the environment. Table 1 presents the current and projected population, households and jobs in the nine-county Bay Area region and Table 2 outlines the present households and jobs for the South San Mateo sub-county level.

TABLE 1: REGIONAL POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS, AND JOBS
TABLE 2: SOUTH SAN MATEO SUB-COUNTY LEVEL HOUSEHOLDS AND JOBS RSG’s research indicates San Carlos currently has about 2.1 million square feet of existing research and development (“R&D”) space, 1.5 million square feet of office space, 4.7 million square feet of industrial space, 1.5 million square feet of existing commercial space, and 12,385 housing units.1 RSG’s analysis of projects currently under construction, developments approved by the City, and projects under review indicates the City’s development pipeline includes an estimated 3.2 million square feet of R&D space, 18,000 square feet of office space, and 197,000 square feet of commercial space.2
RSG projects San Carlos will have demand for R&D, office, industrial, and commercial space3 through 2045. Demand for commercial is moderate in comparison to the forecasted housing 1 Source: CoStar, 2024 Q1
2 Source: City of San Carlos, Department of Community Development, Planning – Development Projects 3 Note: Refer to Appendix 1 for definitions of the key terms used in this Study.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1801
4 allocation and demand for R&D, office, and industrial space. RSG’s residential demand is based on the City’s current RHNA and estimates of what future allocations may be in future RHNA cycles through the year 2045.

Market-based demand may vary from General Plan buildout capacity. For market-based demand to materialize into constructed and occupied buildings, owner interest, ownership concentration (land assembly), access to capital, capital market conditions, local and nearby land use policies, and real estate market conditions must be present along with demand from users for such real estate.

Market-based demand is a combination of demand generated by the growth of businesses and populations in the market area, and demand generated because of functional and economic obsolescence and the replacement of commercial space over time. • Demand generated by the growth of local businesses and populations: Through 2045, we expect the broader economy to grow, which will provide opportunities for businesses and populations in San Carlos and the surrounding region. As a result of this growth and the expansion of business activities in the local economy, businesses will require new commercial space. This alignment of forces will create the economic incentive necessary for new development to occur and local landowners will either develop properties to accommodate new demand, or the demand will materialize elsewhere. • Demand generated as a result of functional and economic obsolescence and the replacement of commercial space over time: Businesses currently occupy existing real estate in San Carlos and the region. Functional obsolescence is a decline in utility of real estate and can occur because of many external factors, including changes to business practices, technological advancements, regulatory changes, tenant preferences, environmental conditions, or general wear-and-tear. Economic obsolescence includes decline in value of real estate due to external factors such as neighborhood decline, changes in market demand, economic downturns, and technological changes.

RSG assumes developers will replace a portion of existing real estate in the region annually, and as redevelopment occurs, we expect San Carlos to capture a portion of the new development. RSG does not consider the new demand generated from functional and economic obsolescence as net new demand, but rather consider it related to the displacement of existing businesses. Displacement can occur when the economics of real estate naturally influence property use within the bounds of the zoning regulations and other local policy.

Functional and economic obsolescence can materialize in different forms – without certain design features or amenities, or because of economic or consumer changes - real estate can become less favorable to potential tenants, making it either functionally or economically obsolete. To illustrate this point, RSG formulated the following examples of how each of the non-residential real estate asset types analyzed within this Study has changed in the recent decades:

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1802
5 • R&D: Life science tenants seek out R&D spaces that have higher ceilings, floorplates with higher load capacities, modern ventilation and air filtration systems, and on-site amenities such as dining, fitness, or childcare centers. Without these features, property owners may find challenges leasing buildings because prospective tenants require these features to accommodate modern equipment and attract premium talent. • Office: Office space has undergone several evolutions over the last century, and tenants now demand modern offices with flexible and collaborative spaces, open floorplan workspaces, technological integration, sustainable office design, health and wellbeing (such as natural light and ergonomic furniture), community and cultural spaces, and onsite amenities. • Industrial: The impacts of ecommerce, consumer preferences, and globalization has affected how developers built out industrial properties in recent decades. To attract modern industrial tenants, developers and property owners are embracing design features for modern logistics spaces, such as higher ceiling clear-heights and increasing utility demands. Modern industrial tenants have adopted automation and advanced logistics systems, which factor into the importance of last-mile delivery, emphasize supply chain resilience, and shift manufacturing to nearshoring.
• Commercial: The impact of ecommerce has shaped the way that developers have positioned new commercial properties in recent decades. Most importantly, developers and owners have positioned and repositioned commercial assets to enhance and focus on experiential environments. Developers today may create experiential retail by embracing mixed-use communities, combining retail with entertainment and leisure, emphasizing food and beverage, creating engaging architectural and landscape designs, fostering community engagement, and adopting omnichannel strategies.

RSG’s analysis combines demand generated by local economic growth and functional and economic obsolescence. Taking into account projects under construction, entitled, and anticipated additional demand between 2024 and 2025, RSG’s market-based demand analysis indicates San Carlos may experience demand for up to 5.6 million square feet of new R&D space, 324,000 square feet of new office space, 144,000 square feet of new industrial space, 262,000 square feet of new commercial space, and 8,300 new housing units, RSG’s demand forecast combines the existing square footage, forecasted demand generated by employment growth and obsolescence, and projects in the City’s development pipeline to estimate potential total buildout in 2045. RSG’s estimated demand forecast includes:
• 7.7 million square feet of R&D space, or about 48 percent of total non-residential real estate square footage in San Carlos in 2045
• 1.8 million square feet of office space, which is about 11 percent of the total nonresidential real estate square footage in San Carlos in 2045 • 4.8 million square feet of industrial space, which is about 30 percent of total nonresidential real estate square footage in San Carlos in 2045

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1803
6 • 1.7 million square feet of commercial space, representing about 11 percent of the total non-residential real estate square footage in San Carlos in 2045 • 20,686 housing units, a 67 percent increase over the total housing units in San Carlos in 2024
Error! Reference source not found. summarizes RSG’s demand analysis.

TABLE 3: DEMAND FORECAST

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1804
7 1. Purpose and Forecast Approach
Purpose
The City and their consultant, PlaceWorks, are preparing an update to the City’s current General Plan to reset the land use development projections to the year 2045. The update will guide long term planning activities over the next two decades (2024-2045) and includes development projections for housing, commercial, industrial and office uses to the year 2045.

As part of this effort, RSG prepared a citywide market-based demand forecast to serve as a reference point, and to provide context for future potential planning assumptions and policies.

This Study presents RSG’s market demand forecast, including our approach, methodology and assumptions supporting the forecast of the market demand for new housing, commercial, office, research and development, and industrial space citywide.

Approach
RSG compiled existing conditions and regional growth projections for housing, population, and jobs from the Association of Bay Area Governments (“ABAG”), Metropolitan Transportation Commission (“MTC”), California Department of Finance (“DOF”), California Employment Development Department (“EDD”), ESRI Business Analyst Online, and Moody’s Analytics. RSG considered existing buildout and market conditions for housing, commercial, office, research and development, and industrial land uses using Costar market reports, and commercial business performance using Claritas and California Department of Tax and Fee Administration taxable sales data.

RSG’s analysis allocates regional market-based demand to San Carlos using a local capture rate.

The capture rates are based on RSG’s evaluation of a variety of metrics that are indicative of future capture rates. For example, historical development patterns and the current pipeline of projects in the region can be indicative of where future development may occur. RSG derived capture metrics from Costar, ESRI Business Analyst Online, and the City’s Housing Element.

RSG’s analysis estimates the demand that San Carlos may capture as a result of displacement of existing businesses due to functional and economic obsolescence. RSG analyzed Costar data for historical rates of R&D, office, industrial, and commercial building demolitions in the region. RSG also evaluated building ages and vacancy rates of older buildings in the region as indicators of potential physical deterioration or economic obsolescence. The regional demand generated by functional and economic obsolescence was also allocated locally using capture rates.

RSG also relied on its experience working in San Carlos and on the Peninsula. In the last 5-years, San Carlos has seen a relatively high level of proposals for development of R&D real estate targeting life science tenants. The current pipeline of R&D projects will increase the total inventory R&D square footage by about 150 percent, from about 2.1 million square feet to about 5.3 million square feet. Most of the proposed projects involve the conversion of land developed for industrial uses to Class A R&D space.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1805
8 Methodology
RSG’s analysis begins with existing square footage in San Carlos, which includes about 2.1 million square feet of R&D, 1.5 million square feet of office, 4.7 million square feet of industrial, and 1.5 million square feet of commercial. RSG subtracted the square footage associated with the projects in the City’s current development pipeline from the estimated market-based demand, resulting in the demand net of pipeline projects. For development projects in the City’s pipeline that will result in demolition of existing space, RSG assumed the demand for the existing space would be additive to demand generated by new employment, and functional and economic obsolescence. RSG’s estimate of the potential total buildout for each land use category includes existing square footage, market-based demand, and projects in the City’s development pipeline. The City’s development pipeline, presented in Table 4, is based on information published to the City’s website in January 2024 with additional input from City staff during the first quarter of 2024.

TABLE 4: SUMMARY OF PIPELINE PROJECTS BY TYPE
RSG used housing, population, and job projections to estimate demand for R&D, office, industrial, and commercial square footage in San Carlos. In preparing this Study, RSG referenced housing, population, and job projections prepared by DOF (population projections), Moody’s (job projections), and ABAG/MTC (population, housing, and jobs). While economic conditions - including but not limited to - economic growth, affect all real estate demand, the key economic drivers vary for each land use category. For example:
• The R&D, office, and industrial demand analysis aligns demand for R&D, office, and industrial real estate with growth of the job market, projected business growth, market conditions, and the local economy.
• The commercial retail demand analysis assumes that demand for commercial retail space in San Carlos is correlated with the number of new housing units built. • Residential demand is typically a function of job growth and corresponding wages in a region as well as migration patterns and household changes.

The sections that follow provide an overview of the methodology and key assumptions:

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1806
9 Assumptions
Research and Development
Beginning with the founding of Genentech in 19764 and with its 27-acre expansion in the early2000’s in South San Francisco5 , research and development has become an increasingly important real estate asset class on the Peninsula. The Bay Area - with abundant talent, proximity to worldclass research universities, and access to capital - emerged as one of the most prominent life science industry clusters in recent years. The Bay Area is among the largest life science clusters in the United States, and has outpaced other life science clusters, such as Boston and San Diego, with the highest life science employment growth rate between 2019 and 2022. The Peninsula represents the largest submarket for life science space in the Bay Area. 6 RSG’s demand forecast for R&D space is based on underlying job growth in the San Mateo County.

Since 2020, industries that occupy R&D space have added over 19,000 jobs in San Mateo County, reflecting an 18.7 percent increase. RSG determined the industries that occupy R&D space include professional, scientific, and technical services, health care, administrative, support, waste management, remediation services, food and chemical manufacturing, and computer and electronic products.7 Additionally, RSG found there are some industries that overlap multiple land uses, specifically R&D, office, and industrial, as illustrated in Appendix 4.

RSG’s forecast considered the demand for R&D real estate resulting from both growth in jobs and functional and economic obsolescence over time.

RSG derived annual job growth figures from Moody’s Analytics economic forecasts for San Mateo County. RSG adjusted the job forecasts to account for the proportion of employees that do not use R&D space, work-from-home trends, and square footage per employee by industry. Table 5 illustrates RSG’s analysis of job growth and the resulting demand for R&D space in year 2024 as an example.

TABLE 5: R&D DEMAND GENERATED BY JOB GROWTH IN 2024, SAN MATEO COUNTY RSG’s forecast also accounts for functional and economic obsolescence. RSG evaluated office space Countywide, including the age of existing inventory and the vacancy rates associated with 4 Source: City of South San Francisco, “Biotech in SSF” 5 Source: EPA, “Genentech Development in South San Francisco” 6 Source: CBRE “San Francisco Bay Area Life Sciences” 2024 Q1 7 Note: For a complete list of industry sectors, refer to Appendix 4.

Industry
2024 Job
Growth
% Using R&D
Space
2024 Jobs
Using R&D
Space
R&D SF
per Job
2024
R&D SF
Demand
Professional, Scientific, Technical Consulting 880 92% 811 384 311,071 Administrative, Support, Waste Mgmt, & Remediation Svs (579) 18% (107) 384 (40,954) Miscellaneous Manufacturing 10 39% 4 561 2,096
Health Care and Social Assistance 397 61% 241 384 92,413 Chemical Manufacturing 37 85% 31 561 17,619
Computer and Electronic Products Manufacturing 309 64% 197 230 45,268 Food Manufacturing 195 46% 89 561 50,024
Net Total 1,249 1,266 477,538
Sources: Moody's Analytics, Costar, San Mateo County All Together Better, RSG

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1807
10 buildings by age. Based on an analysis of building demolition in the region over the last 10 years, RSG’s analysis of historical demolition rates indicates developers and property owners replace about 0.77 percent of R&D buildings each year due to functional and economic obsolescence.

Table 6 presents RSG’s estimate of R&D demand as a result of functional and economic obsolescence in year 2024.

TABLE 6: R&D DEMAND GENERATED BY OBSOLESCENCE IN 2024, SAN MATEO COUNTY Finally, RSG adjusted the combined Countywide demand for R&D space based on a local capture rate. The capture rate represents RSG’s estimate of San Carlos’ share of Countywide demand. A variety of factors can impact the capture rate, such as land availability, historical development patterns, and local business cluster effects. To estimate the capture rate, RSG collected data for current households, historical housing growth, projected household growth, future apartment pipeline, RHNA allocations, existing office inventory, existing Class A office inventory, future office pipeline, and employment for each city in San Mateo County. Future office supply is the key capture metric affecting the capture rate for R&D space in San Carlos. When selecting a capture rate, RSG applied heavier weighting to future office supply. RSG concluded that San Carlos’ capture rate for new R&D development is 44 percent of Countywide development.

RSG’s demand analysis includes job forecasts and estimates of functional and economic obsolescence through 2045. The City’s development pipeline includes projects that will be built out between 2024 and 2034. RSG combined the market-based demand and development pipeline in an aggregated buildout forecast. Table 7 presents the aggregated demand generated by new employment growth and functional and economic obsolescence.

TABLE 7: AGGREGATED R&D BUILDOUT FORECAST, SAN CARLOS
RSG’s forecast indicates there will be demand for 5.6 million square feet of R&D space in San Carlos through 2045. The City’s current development pipeline includes about 3.2 million square Industry
2024 Total
Jobs
% Using R&D
Space
Obsolescence
Rate
R&D SF
per Job
2024
R&D SF
Demand
Professional, Scientific, Technical Consulting 67,393 92% 0.77% 384 183,230 Administrative, Support, Waste Mgmt, & Remediation Svs 25,672 18% 0.77% 384 13,960 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 1,634 39% 0.77% 561 2,726
Health Care and Social Assistance 42,902 61% 0.77% 384 76,848 Chemical Manufacturing 10,902 85% 0.77% 561 39,871
Computer and Electronic Products Manufacturing 6,079 64% 0.77% 230 6,837 Food Manufacturing 2,715 46% 0.77% 561 5,343
Net Total 157,297 328,814
Sources: Moody's Analytics, Costar, San Mateo County All Together Better, RSG 2024-2029 2030-2034 2035-2039 2040-2045
2024-2045
Total
Existing R&D Square Feet 2,099,411
R&D Square Feet Demand 2,743,939 1,249,489 887,695 732,923 5,614,045 R&D Pipeline 2,042,655 1,181,460 0 0 3,224,115
R&D Demand Net of Pipeline 701,284 68,029 887,695 732,923 2,389,930 Potential Total R&D Buildout 7,713,456

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1808
11 feet of R&D space, which reduces the forecasted demand to about 2.4 million square feet through 2045.

San Carlos currently has about 2.1 million square feet of operating R&D space. If the forecasted demand is built out, San Carlos will have about 7.7 million square feet of R&D space, which will represent about 48 percent of the projected non-residential square footage in 2045.

Office
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and tracing back to the Great Financial Crisis, the Peninsula office market enjoyed steady growth, low vacancy rates, and consistent deliveries of new office space to the market.8 At the beginning of 2024, about 21.7 percent of Class A and B office space on the Peninsula was vacant, which is comparatively better than the greater Bay Area (25.1 percent) but is well-above the long-term market average vacancy rate. 9 At the end of 2019, the office
vacancy rate in the San Francisco Market Area was 6.0 percent, which was among the lowest vacancy rates for major U.S. metropolitan areas.
10 The office market is showing some positive trends: leasing volume - led by artificial intelligence companies - has improved, and key indicators of activity and the “return to office” have shown slight improvements in early 2024. Despite these improvements, continued tenant downsizing is expected to cause vacancies to rise and rental rates to decline in the year ahead.

RSG derived market-based demand for office space from job growth in San Mateo County. While office-using job growth has been strong in recent years - growing by about 18 percent since 2020 - the forecasted job growth for office-using tenants is expected to moderate going forward. From 2024 to 2030, Moody’s Analytics forecasts less than 2,000 new office jobs in San Mateo County, reflecting a 0.3 percent annual growth rate.

RSG assigned key growing industry segments to the office real estate sector, including finance and insurance, real estate, management of companies and enterprises, and administrative, support, waste management, and remediation services, internet service providers, web search portals, and data processing services, other information services, and education. RSG also found declining industry segments occupying office real estate, such as newspaper, publishers, motion picture and sound recording, broadcasting (excluding internet), and telecommunications. Some industry segments RSG assigned to the office sector have overlap with the R&D and industrial real estate categories. Appendix 4 provides a complete list of industry sectors associated with office real estate.

RSG estimated office demand resulting from the incremental growth and functional and economic obsolescence through 2045.

RSG derived annual job growth from Moody’s Analytics economic forecasts for San Mateo County.

RSG adjusted the job forecasts to account for the proportion of employees that do not use office space (such as small independent owner-operator businesses), work-from-home trends, and 8 Source: Costar “San Francisco Market Area” August 7, 2024 9 Source: CBRE “Bay Area Office Snapshot” 2024 Q1
10 Source: Costar “San Francisco Market Area” May 15, 2024

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1809
12 square footage per employee by industry, which reduces the overall demand. Table 8 illustrates RSG’s analysis of job growth and the resulting demand for office space in San Mateo County in 2024 as an example.

TABLE 8: OFFICE DEMAND GENERATED BY JOB GROWTH IN 2024, SAN MATEO COUNTY RSG also factored in the effects of functional and economic obsolescence. RSG evaluated office space Countywide, including the age of existing inventory and the vacancy rates associated with buildings by age. RSG estimates that 0.77 percent of office buildings are replaced each year due to functional and economic obsolescence. Table 9 presents RSG’s estimate of Countywide office demand generated by functional and economic obsolescence in 2024.

TABLE 9: OFFICE DEMAND GENERATED BY OBSOLESCENCE IN 2024, SAN MATEO COUNTY Lastly, RSG adjusted the combined Countywide office demand based on a local capture rate. RSG developed the capture rate and based it on the share of current households, historical housing growth, projected household growth, future apartment pipeline, RHNA allocations, existing office inventory, existing Class A office inventory, future office pipeline, and employment for each city in San Mateo County. The key capture metrics affecting future office demand include existing office inventory, existing Class A office inventory, and the pipeline of future office buildings. RSG weighed the key capture metrics more heavily when selecting a capture rate. The capture rate for new office development in San Carlos is 5 percent of Countywide growth.

RSG aggregated the demand generated by new employment growth and functional and economic obsolescence through 2045. Projects within the City’s development pipeline are expected to be built out between 2024 and 2030. RSG combined the market-based demand and development pipeline in an aggregated buildout forecast. Table 10 illustrates the forecasted office demand in San Carlos.

Industry
2024 Job
Growth
% Using
Office Space
2024 Jobs
Using Office
Space
Office SF
per Job
2024
Office SF
Demand
Corporate (473) 72% (340) 240 (81,594)
Information 747 78% 580 260 150,921
Education and Health Services 287 85% 243 240 58,355
Flex 155 18% 28 230 6,499
Net Total 717 512 134,181
Sources: Moody's Analytics, Costar, San Mateo County All Together Better, RSG Industry
2024 Total
Jobs
% Using
Office Space
Obsolescence
Rate
Office SF
per Job
2024
Office SF
Demand
Corporate 55,557 72% 0.77% 240 80,753
Information 62,517 78% 0.77% 260 13,960
Education and Health Services 13,325 85% 0.77% 240 76,848 Flex 9,730 18% 0.77% 230 39,871
Net Total 141,129 211,432
Sources: Moody's Analytics, Costar, San Mateo County All Together Better, RSG

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1810
13 TABLE 10: AGGREGATED OFFICE BUILDOUT FORECAST, SAN CARLOS RSG’s forecast suggests there will be demand for almost 324,000 square feet of office space in San Carlos through 2045. The City’s current development pipeline includes about 18,000 square feet of office, which, if built, will serve to fulfill part of the total demand. The resulting demand net of the current development pipeline is about 306,000 square feet of office space.

San Carlos currently has about 1.5 million square feet of office space. The inventory of office space may increase to about 1.8 million square feet if the forecasted demand is met by new development. If built, the buildout potential would represent about 13 percent of non-residential square footage in San Carlos.

Industrial
With broader economic and global trends working in favor of industrial real estate, such as the importance of last-mile delivery and nearshoring of manufacturing, the industrial real estate market has remained in better condition than other real estate asset types through recent years.

The industrial market in San Carlos currently has a stabilized 3.0 percent vacancy rate and $2.50 per square foot per month lease rate.11 The industrial market on the Peninsula has not experienced the same strength and possesses an 11.3 percent vacancy rate. This rate is largely attributed to the pull back in demand for research and development-oriented industrial space. The industrial market is not immune to broader economic trends, but has weathered inflation, work-from-home trends, interest rate increases, and banking turmoil better than the office market.

RSG’s industrial demand forecast is based on job growth in San Mateo County. Growing industrialusing industry segments include non-store retailers, food manufacturing, computer and electronic product manufacturing, wholesale electronic markets and agents and brokers, and transportation and warehousing. Moody’s Analytics forecasts the total employment for most other industrialusing industry segments to either decline or remain relatively unchanged. RSG determined the largest industrial-using industry segments include construction-related users, specialty trade contractors, chemical manufacturing, wholesalers of durable and nondurable goods, and transportation and warehousing. As illustrated in Appendix 4, RSG found there is an overlap between some industry segments utilizing both industrial properties and R&D real estate, primarily chemical, computer and electronics products, and other manufacturing.

RSG estimated the demand for industrial space resulting from the growth of industrial-using industries and functional and economic obsolescence through 2045. RSG utilized Moody’s 11 Source: Costar “San Carlos Industrial and Flex-Industrial Data” May 16, 2024 2024-2029 2030-2034 2035-2039 2040-2045
2024-2045
Total
Existing Office Square Feet 1,462,501
Office Square Feet Demand 143,525 67,051 56,693 56,594 323,862 Office Pipeline 17,847 0 0 0 17,847
Office Demand Net of Pipeline 125,678 67,051 56,693 56,594 306,015 Potential Total Office Buildout 1,786,363

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1811
14 Analytics economic forecasts for San Mateo County for job growth forecasts. RSG adjusted the job forecasts by an assumed percentage of employees that use industrial space, work-from-home trends, and square footage per employee by industry.

RSG found the square foot per job varied significantly by industry. It is RSG’s understanding that industrial space utilized by the construction industry, for example, will have lower square feet per job because most of the labor occurs at a location that differs from the business address.

Furthermore, RSG understands that for transportation, warehousing, and utilities, a large portion of the industrial space occupied by businesses in this sector is dedicated to the storage of raw materials, meaning there are fewer employees.

Table 11 presents our projections of new industrial square footage in the County for 2024 TABLE 11: INDUSTRIAL DEMAND GENERATED BY JOB GROWTH IN 2024, SAN MATEO COUNTY Functional and economic obsolescence will also increase demand for new industrial space due to the evolution of building features and amenities required by industrial tenants. RSG evaluated industrial space Countywide, including the age of existing inventory and the vacancy rates associated with buildings by age. RSG estimates that functional and economic obsolescence requires that property owners replace about 1.11 percent of industrial buildings annually. Table 12 presents RSG’s estimate of Countywide industrial demand as a result of functional and economic obsolescence.

TABLE 12: INDUSTRIAL DEMAND GENERATED BY OBSOLESCENCE IN 2024, SAN MATEO COUNTY RSG adjusted the Countywide office demand based on a local capture rate to estimate the demand for industrial space in San Carlos through 2045. The capture rate for industrial real estate is based on current households, projected household growth, industrial inventory, industrial development over the last 5 and 10 years, housing unit growth, employment, future multifamily development pipeline, future industrial development pipeline, and RHNA allocations. The key capture metrics for industrial demand are industrial inventory, industrial development history, and industrial development pipeline. Key capture metrics were weighted when selecting a capture rate for San Industry
2024 Job
Growth
% Using Industrial
Space
2024 Jobs
Using Industrial
Space
Industrial
SF per
Job
2024
Industrial SF
Demand
Construction (125) 91.8% (115) 190 (21,821)
Manufacturing 331 34.7% 87 561 48,801
Wholesale Trade 73 78.3% 58 233 13,407
Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities 502 42.2% 231 428 98,971 Net Total 781 261 139,359
Sources: Moody's Analytics, Costar, San Mateo County All Together Better, RSG Industry
2024 Total
Jobs
% Using Industrial
Space
Obsolescence
Rate
Industrial
SF per
Job
2024
Industrial SF
Demand
Construction 19,783 91.8% 1.11% 190 46,062
Manufacturing 26,631 30.4% 1.11% 561 50,498
Wholesale Trade 11,413 78.3% 1.11% 233 23,187
Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities 38,363 90.5% 1.11% 428 167,250 Net Total 96,190 286,998
Sources: Moody's Analytics, Costar, San Mateo County All Together Better, RSG

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1812
15 Carlos. Based on the key capture metrics, RSG concluded the industrial capture rate for San Carlos is 3.0 percent of Countywide growth.

RSG’s demand analysis combines demand generated by job growth, functional and economic obsolescence through 2045. Between 2024 and 2034, RSG expects the City’s development pipeline to be built out. RSG aggregated the adjusted demand generated by new employment growth, and functional and economic obsolescence with the City’s development pipeline, as shown in Table 13.

TABLE 13: AGGREGATED INDUSTRIAL BUILDOUT FORECAST, SAN CARLOS The industrial demand forecast suggests there will be demand for about 144,000 square feet of industrial space through 2045. Additionally, about 695,000 square feet of existing industrial space is expected to be converted to other uses during the forecast period which, in a stabilized real estate market, will increase demand for industrial space, as tenants are displaced with very little vacant space to move into.

Commercial
From the beginning of 2015 through the first quarter of 2020, commercial real estate rental rates in San Carlos experienced average annual growth of about 3.0 percent. However, from 2020 Q2 to 2024 Q2, commercial rental rates have grown at just 0.2 percent each year. Despite a 2 percent vacancy rate, similar to other markets, commercial real estate in San Carlos has struggled since the beginning of the pandemic. Also, broader market trends have contributed to this challenge over the years. For instance, the ongoing transition from brick-and-mortar shopping to online shopping has affected commercial real estate’s appeal as an attractive real estate class for investors.

The commercial land use category includes retail, restaurant, and hospitality real estate. RSG estimated the demand for commercial space based on a forecast of future housing growth. As developers build new housing units in San Carlos the total household spending will increase proportionally. And as household spending increases, the demand for retail and restaurants in San Carlos will grow. Appendix 4 presents the industries that RSG determined will occupy commercial real estate.

For the purpose of estimating commercial demand, RSG based future household growth on historical and recent development patterns. Based on the City’s development pipeline, RSG expects 50 units to be built in 2024, 37 units in 2025, and 242 units to be built in 2026, for an average annual unit growth rate of 0.89 percent. As a result, the housing inventory in San Carlos is expected to grow by about 0.89 percent per year.
2024-2029 2030-2034 2035-2039 2040-2045
2024-2045
Total
Existing Industrial Square Feet 4,703,321
Industrial Square Feet Demand 38,551 28,192 32,260 44,913 143,916 Industrial Pipeline (695,318) 0 0 0 (695,318)
Industrial Demand Net of Pipeline 733,869 28,192 32,260 44,913 839,234 Potential Total Industrial Buildout 4,847,237

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1813
16 Based on the current population per household of 2.61 in San Carlos, each new housing unit will increase the population accordingly. Deriving the population from future housing growth is critical because consumer spending is best represented on a per capita basis. Presently, household spending on commercial services and products is about $16,900 per capita. Based on historical growth rates, RSG forecasted household consumer spending to increase by approximately 1.99 percent per year.

RSG determined the household spending rate based on historical average growth rates. Based on projected housing growth and per capita spending, RSG estimated the spending capacity of the new households in San Carlos, which amounts to almost $6.2 million in the first forecasted year.

To arrive at total forecasted consumer spending, RSG studied the retail sales per square foot for a trade area based on a 15-minute drive-time from Downtown San Carlos. The trade area includes about 10.8 million square feet of commercial space, including spaces currently occupied by businesses in the following subsectors: general merchandise, apparel, furniture, food at home (grocery), food away from home (restaurants), health and personal care, building materials, vehicle maintenance.12 Collectively, general merchandise, apparel, furniture and other retail is referred to as “GAFO,” while food at home, food away from home, health and personal care, building materials, and vehicle maintenance is referred to as “non-GAFO.” Among these business categories within the trade area, almost $4.1 billion is spent on an annual basis, meaning that the average sales per square foot is about $375. This figure was separately verified using taxable transaction data from California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.

TABLE 14: EXISTING SALES PER SQUARE FOOT CALCULATION, SAN CARLOS By applying the $375 sales per square foot to the spending capacity created by new household formations, RSG estimated the supportable gross leasable square footage in San Carlos. This figure was adjusted based on historical and existing leakage trends, and several capture metrics, including the share of households, projected household growth, housing unit growth, future apartment supply, and the City’s RHNA allocations. RSG also adjusted the supportable gross leasable square footage by an e-commerce capture rate. E-commerce is a growing proportion of retail sales every year, and RSG expects this trend to continue throughout the forecast period.

RSG summarized the methodology for estimating the commercial demand below. • When new housing units are built, the population of San Carlos will grow; population growth in San Carlos will generate new per capita spending. • The new spending divided by the $375 retail sales per square foot as shown in Table 14 approximates the square footage demand generated by new spending. 12 Note: RSG excluded space dedicated to non-store retailers (e-commerce), motor vehicle, and gasoline sales.

Business Sales Type Actual Sales
Existing Retail
Space (SF)
Current Retail
Sales per SF
GAFO - General Merchandise, Apparel, Furniture, and Others $1,266,790,305 4,982,489 $254 Non GAFO - Food, Alocohol, Health, Auto Mainenance, and Others $2,798,318,379 5,856,434 $478 Total (GAFO + Non-GAFO) $4,065,108,684 10,838,923 $375
Sources: Claritas Reports, Costar, RSG

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1814
17 • The square footage demand generated by new spending is reduced based on existing retail leakage patterns, San Carlos’ share of the trade area under review, a rate of historical commercial construction, and a capture rate.

This forecast suggests there will be about 262,000 square feet of new commercial space demand in San Carlos through 2045.

The City’s current development pipeline includes about 197,000 square feet of commercial space, mostly attributed to the approved hotel at 501 Industrial Road (150,000 square feet) and the ancillary commercial space at the proposed Alexandria properties. After accounting for the pipeline projects, RSG estimates the net total demand is about 65,000 square feet of commercial space that may be absorbed by San Carlos by 2045.

RSG’s demand analysis combines square footage demand generated by forecasted job growth and functional and economic obsolescence. RSG also incorporated the City’s development pipeline, which RSG expects to be built out between 2024 and 2034. RSG aggregated the demand and pipeline in Table 15.

TABLE 15: AGGREGATED COMMERCIAL BUILDOUT FORECAST, SAN CARLOS The commercial demand forecast suggests there will be demand for about 262,000 square feet through 2045. RSG expects about 197,000 square feet to be built out from pipeline projects, meaning the estimated potential total commercial buildout is 1,773,000 square feet.

Residential
The City adopted the 2023-2031 Housing Element in January 2023, and California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) certified the Housing Element in April 2024. HCD makes the regional housing needs determination for each region in California. ABAG distributes the regional housing need determination to jurisdictions in the Bay Area, in a process known as the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (“RHNA”). The Housing Element establishes a Sites Inventory to ensure that the City has sufficient development sites to adequately accommodate the City’s RHNA.

RSG assumed the number of housing units produced during the 6th Housing Element Cycle, from 2025 to 2030, would align with the anticipated units built on the housing development sites designated in the City’s Housing Element, or 3,173 units.

While HCD, ABAG, and the City have yet to begin analysis for the 7th Housing Element Cycle - which extends from 2031 to 2038 - this Study assumes the City’s unit production for the 7 th Cycle would
be equivalent to the City’s 6th Cycle RHNA, or 2,735 units. 2024-2029 2030-2034 2035-2039 2040-2045
2024-2045
Total
Existing Commercial Square Feet 1,510,979
Commercial Square Feet Demand 95,608 73,230 59,440 33,984 262,262 Commercial Pipeline 182,988 14,043 0 0 197,031
Commercial Demand Net of Pipeline (87,380) 59,187 59,440 33,984 65,231 Potential Total Commercial Buildout 1,773,241

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1815
18 Finally, because this Study extends to 2045, a portion of the 8th Housing Element Cycle overlaps with the forecast period. For the 8
th Cycle, which extends from 2039 to 2046, RSG assumed the City’s unit production would be equivalent to the City’s 6th Cycle RHNA, or 2,735 units across the full 8th Cycle. Because the forecast terminates in 2045, RSG’s forecast includes a pro rata share of the 6th Cycle RHNA, or 2,393 housing units that are forecasted to be developed between 2039 and 2045. Appendix 5 includes a detailed housing unit forecast through 2045. Table 16 summarizes the forecasted housing production in San Carlos.

TABLE 16: HOUSING PROJECTION SUMMARY / RHNA, SAN CARLOS RSG assumed the average household size would be about 2.6 persons per household. When applied to the forecasted new housing development, a total of 8,301 housing units, RSG estimates the population of San Carlos will grow by 21,670, bringing the estimated 2045 population to about 54,000, which represents a 2.4 percent annual growth rate over the forecast period.

DOF published population forecasts for San Mateo County through 2060. DOF’s latest forecast, published in March 2024, indicates the County’s population is expected to increase slightly from about 727,600 in 2024, to about 728,400 in 2045. Furthermore, DOF population estimates indicate the San Mateo County population declined from about 771,000 in 2020, to 737,600 in 2023, a negative 1.1 percent growth rate. While this Study does not anticipate negative or flat growth for San Carlos, it is worth noting the DOF population projections do not align with HCD’s regional housing need determination, despite the first step of HCD’s housing planning process including consultation with DOF.

Limitations
The purpose of this Study is to estimate market-based demand for housing and commercial real estate through 2045. This Study is intended to serve as a reference point in the planning process associated with the 2045 General Plan Reset, and to provide context for future planning efforts and policies.

This Study and the contents of the forecast are based on projections, forecasts, and assumptions published by third party public agencies and private businesses. As noted earlier with DOF’s population projections and HCD’s regional housing needs determination, occasionally there are disagreements between published datasets. RSG made its best effort to consider each perspective and discussed discrepancies with City staff and PlaceWorks prior to finalizing the forecast and this Study.

Further, most economic projections, forecasts, and assumptions are not as geographically precise as we need to be in this Study. Most projections, forecasts, and assumptions are based on County12.b May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1816
19 level, regional, or Statewide geographies. When necessary, RSG adjusted projections, forecasts, and assumptions based on its understanding of the local market.

Additionally, this Study represents RSG’s estimate of market-based demand at a specific point in time. The real estate market is not static – real estate market participants are constantly adjusting to changes in risk, capital markets and access to capital, inflation, global events, construction costs, inventories and real estate market conditions, supply and demand, and other variables.

Finally, this Study does not account for unforeseen changes to policy, market, or development patterns on a regional- or State-level. It is possible that local policy changes in the region will affect development feasibility and redirect investment in research and development real estate away from San Carlos. Future policy, market, or development patterns can greatly affect San Carlos’ buildout.

2. Market Demand Forecast
Based on the methodology and assumptions described in this Study, RSG developed a marketbased demand forecast for research and development (“R&D”), office, industrial, commercial, and residential real estate. The sections that follow describe the forecast findings for each real estate asset class.

Research and Development
RSG developed a forecast of R&D real estate for San Carlos based on the methodology and assumptions outlined in this Study. The key findings are presented below. • The demand for research and development space in San Carlos is estimated to be about

5.6 million square feet through 2045.
• The City’s existing development pipeline includes about 3.2 million square feet of research and development space, expected to be built between 2024 and 2033. • Net demand, which is adjusted for the development pipeline, is estimated to be about 2.4 million square feet of research and development space.

Table 17 illustrates research and development demand through 2045.

TABLE 17: R&D DEMAND SUMMARY 2024-45
2024-2045
Total
Existing R&D Square Feet (A) 2,099,411
R&D Square Feet Demand (B = C + D) 5,614,045
R&D Pipeline (C) 3,224,115
R&D Demand Net of Pipeline (D) 2,389,930
Potential Total R&D Buildout (E = A + B) 7,713,456

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1817
20 Office
Key findings identified from RSG’s forecast of San Carlos office real estate is based on the methodology and assumptions outlined in this Study and are presented below. • Office demand through 2045 in San Carlos is estimated to be about 324,000 square feet. • The City’s development pipeline includes about 18,000 square feet of office, which is expected to be completed in 2024.
• Net demand for office space in San Carlos is estimated to be about 306,000 square feet through 2045.

Table 18 illustrates RSG’s forecasted office demand, the existing office pipeline, and net demand through 2045.

TABLE 18: OFFICE DEMAND SUMMARY 2024-45
Industrial
RSG generated a forecast of industrial real estate demand through 2045 based on the methodology and assumptions outlined in this Study. Key findings are presented below. • Estimated demand for industrial space in San Carlos is 144,000 square feet through 2045. • In contrast to other real estate types, industrial real estate is commonly being converted to R&D space. The industrial real estate market is stabilized, with low vacancy rates and stable lease rates, meaning that as industrial space is demolished or converted to other real estate types, the demand for industrial real estate is expected to increase. RSG estimates about 695,000 square feet of industrial space will be removed from the real estate market as the research and development pipeline is built out through 2033, which will increase demand for industrial space proportionally.
• Net demand for industrial space is expected to be approximately 839,000 square feet in San Carlos through 2045.

Table 19 illustrates RSG’s forecasted industrial demand, with demand increasing as a result of industrial space being removed from the real estate market as it is converted to R&D space or demolished to accommodate the development of R&D space. 2024-2045
Total
Existing Office Square Feet (A) 1,462,501
Office Square Feet Demand (B = C + D) 323,862
Office Pipeline (C) 17,847
Office Demand Net of Pipeline (D) 306,015
Potential Total Office Buildout (E = A + B) 1,786,363

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1818
21 TABLE 19: INDUSTRIAL DEMAND SUMMARY 2024-45
Commercial
The methodology and assumptions outlined in this Study were used to produce a market-based demand forecast for commercial real estate, including retail, restaurant, and hospitality uses. The key findings are presented below.
• Commercial real estate demand in San Carlos amounts to about 262,000 square feet through 2045.
• Based on the existing development pipeline, RSG estimates about 197,000 square feet of retail will be constructed as ancillary uses to existing pipeline projects, expected to be built out between 2024 and 2033.
• The net retail demand through 2045 in San Carlos is about 65,000 square feet.

Table 20 summarizes RSG’s forecast of commercial demand.

TABLE 20: COMMERCIAL DEMAND SUMMARY 2024-45
Residential
RSG’s forecast of demand for residential real estate through 2045 is based on the City’s 2023-2031 Housing Element and RHNA. Key findings related to the residential demand forecast are presented below.
• The City’s Housing Element forecasts development of 3,173 housing units during the 6th Housing Element Cycle (2023-2030), and 342 housing units per year through the 7th and 8th Housing Element Cycles (2031-2038, and 2039-2046, respectively), amounting to 8,301 new dwelling units through 2045.

RSG’s forecast of housing unit production through 2045 is summarized in Table 21 and detailed in Appendix 5.
2024-2045
Total
Existing Industrial Square Feet (A) 4,703,321
Industrial Square Feet Demand (B = C + D) 143,916
Industrial Pipeline (C) (695,318)
Industrial Demand Net of Pipeline (D) 839,234
Potential Total Industrial Buildout (E = A + B) 4,847,237 2024-2045
Total
Existing Commercial Square Feet (A) 1,510,979
Commercial Square Feet Demand (B = C + D) 262,262
Commercial Pipeline (C) 197,031
Commercial Demand Net of Pipeline (D) 65,231
Potential Total Commercial Buildout (E = A + B) 1,773,241

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1819
22 TABLE 21: HOUSING PRODUCTION SUMMARY 2024-45
Jobs-Housing Balance
RSG reviewed the City’s jobs-housing ratio and balance. Historically, the City has had a more balanced jobs-housing ratio than other cities on the Peninsula. While it is reasonable to monitor the City’s jobs-housing ratio, achieving a balance between housing and jobs should be considered the responsibility of ABAG/MTC, and is addressed through the Plan Bay Area and Regional Housing Needs Allocation processes.

Throughout the nine-county Bay Area region, the jobs-housing ratio was 1.4 jobs per household in 2023, and ABAG/MTC are forecasting the jobs-housing ratio to remain relatively unchanged through 2050, reflecting a regional balance between commercial development and housing production.

More specifically, the South San Mateo County sub-county level jobs-housing ratio was 1.9 jobs per household in 2023, and is forecasted to increase to about 2.4 jobs per household in 2050.13 RSG’s analysis indicates that the City’s current jobs-housing ratio is about 1.7 jobs per household.

RSG’s forecast indicates that the City’s jobs-housing ratio will increase moderately to 1.8 jobs per household.
13 Source: ABAG/MTC, “Plan Bay Area 2050+ Draft Blueprint Compendium” published June 2024 2024-2045
Total
Existing Dwelling Units (A) 12,385
New Dwelling Units (B = C + D) 8,301
Single Family Units (C) 419
Multifamily Units (D) 7,882
Total Dwelling Units (E = A + B) 20,686

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1820
23 APPENDIX 1: KEY TERMS
Research and Development (“R&D”): R&D space can take a variety of forms, ranging from highly specialized industrial flex buildings to Class A/A+ office space. In general, developers design R&D space to accommodate life science and technology tenants. Life science tenants include chemical manufacturing, pharmaceutical, medical device manufacturing, among others. Food and agricultural technology - such as businesses engaged in plant-based and cell-cultivated foods or businesses deploying artificial intelligence, robotics, or biotechnology in agricultural settings - also require similar infrastructure to life science tenants.

R&D tenants often require increased ceiling heights to accommodate equipment and infrastructure, specialized space for virus and bacteria isolation14, labware and hazardous material storage, heavy-duty air filtration, state of the art environmental controls, backup generators, reinforced floors, increased roof load capacities and significantly upgraded utilities. Developers typically pair these unique features with traditional office space within a single building shell to allow tenants to perform business activities - such as management, administrative, human resources, marketing, and sales - in the same building as the research and product manufacturing.

Office: Office real estate includes space designed to accommodate office-using tenants that may include finance, insurance, real estate, administrative, telecommunications, and education tenants. An office is a single- or multi-story building that may include a lobby, assembly, or reception area, dedicated meeting or conference rooms, individual rooms, or open cubicle-style desks to accommodate a wide range of business, professional, and institutional industries. Offices generally include support spaces, such as supply rooms, break rooms, printer/copier/fax centers, server rooms, and document rooms. Occasionally, larger offices or office campuses can include onsite tenant and visitor amenities, such as on-site cafes and dining, childcare, or fitness facilities.

Industrial: Industrial real estate is designed to meet the needs of tenants and businesses engaged in logistics, warehousing, construction trades, repair and maintenance, traditional manufacturing, wholesale, and non-store retail (e-commerce). Industrial buildings generally include single-story “shell” buildings with very little or no interior buildout. When there are interior improvements, there may be support offices, storage rooms, and bathrooms, but this typically represents a small portion of the structure. The primary space is typically unconditioned (does not have insulation, 14 Note: On August 14, 2023, the City adopted Ordinance 1597 to amend the San Carlos Municipal Code Section 18.06.020, 18.07.020, and 18.41.020 to prohibit research and development activities requiring biosafety level (“BSL”) 3 and 4 containment. According to the United States Center of Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), BSL 3 laboratories may engage in handling of microbes that can cause serious or potentially lethal disease through respiratory transmission, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the bacteria that causes tuberculosis. The CDC specifies BSL 4 laboratories has the highest level of biological safety, and while there are very few BLS 4 laboratories, the microbes handled in a BSL 4 laboratory are very dangerous, pose a high risk of infection, are frequently considered fatal, and there may not be suitable treatment or vaccines. Ebola is a disease caused by a group of viruses that scientists may study in a BSL 4 laboratory. Source: CDC “Recognizing the Biosafety Levels”

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1821
24 climate controls, air conditioning, or heating) and designated for storage of goods (warehousing), or manufacturing. Industrial buildings generally have greater utility capacity than other types of buildings to accommodate the utility demands of manufacturing, automation, and logistics equipment.

Commercial: Commercial real estate includes traditional retail space, designed for sales of general merchandise, apparel, furniture, electronics, vehicles, as well as food at home (grocery), food away from home (restaurants), and other product sales.15 Commercial structures are typically single-story tenant suites with dedicated storefronts or street frontage. Commercial spaces may be individually owned, or part of a larger commercial center. Tenants generally lease commercial spaces as warm shells with minimal interior improvements.

Residential: There are several different types of residential real estate in San Carlos, including single-family homes, condominiums or townhomes, and multifamily apartments. RSG’s residential forecast is based on the City’s adopted 2023-2031 Housing Element, which the California Department of Housing and Development (“HCD”) certified in April 2024. RSG’s forecast of housing units for the 6th Housing Element Cycle (2023-2030) aligns with the anticipated units built according to the Housing Element. The forecast extends to 2045, which will include the 7th Housing Element Cycle and a portion of the 8th Housing Element Cycle. Because HCD has not released RHNA for the 7th and 8th Housing Element Cycles, RSG and the City assumed the City’s 7th and 8th Housing Element Cycles will match the City’s 6th Housing Element Cyle RHNA.

Pipeline: The City and RSG worked together to develop and refine the pipeline of development projects in San Carlos that are either under construction, approved, or currently under review. RSG estimated the completion year based on the current status, total square footage, and number of phases associated with each development.

Demand: RSG relied on job forecast data obtained from Moody’s Analytics, and referenced population, housing, and job forecasts from Association of Bay Area Governments, California Department of Finance, California Employment Development Department, and ESRI Business Analyst Online. Job forecasts are correlated to the square footage that businesses must lease to accommodate growth and new employees, after accounting for work-from-home trends, small independent operators, and varying square footage per job by industry. For commercial, industrial, office, and R&D land uses, RSG expresses demand in terms of square feet of building area. For residential uses, RSG expresses demand in terms of number of residential units. 15 Note: For the purposes of this study, commercial real estate includes hospitality uses and excludes multifamily housing.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1822
25 APPENDIX 2: DETAILED DEMAND FORECAST

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1823
26 APPENDIX 3: PIPELINE PROJECTS
Address/Name
Development
Type Status Size (SF) Units
Completion
Year Other Names
552-560 El Camino Real Multifamily Under Construction 31,381 24 2024 993 Laurel St Office Under Construction 17,847 - 2024
1240 El Camino Real Multifamily Under Construction 16,390 8 2024 405 Industrial Rd R&D Under Construction 240,000 - 2024 1525 San Carlos Ave Multifamily Under Construction 34,878 18 2024 1030 Brittan Ave R&D Under Construction 75,780 - 2024
1021 Howard Ave R&D Approved 190,869 - 2025
626-648 Walnut St Multifamily Approved 83,329 37 2025
888 Bransten Rd R&D Approved 208,332 - 2026
642 Quarry Rd R&D Approved 410,000 - 2026
11 El Camino Real Multifamily Approved 250,000 242 2026 501 Industrial Rd Commercial Approved 150,000 - 2028 Hotel Indigo San Carlos 841-851 Old county R&D Approved 345,000 - 2028 North and South Building Alexandria Properties R&D Under Review 1,754,134 - 2033 Alexandria Buildings 1-6 Source: Costar, City of San Carlos, and RSG
Notes:

Under Construction means an application has been approved and the project is currently being built.

Approved means an application has been approved but the project construction has not begun.

Under Review means and application has been submitted and is currently being reviewed by the City.

Completed projects, such as 777 Industrial Rd and 1091 Industrial Rd are included in the Existing Square Feet.

Pipeline Projects and the Buildout Forecast exclude Anticipated Development Sites, which are based on pre-application project inquiries.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1824
27 APPENDIX 4: NAICS INDUSTRIES AND LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS NAICS
Code Industry Name
Primary
Land Use
Secondary
Land Use(s)
54 Professional, Scientific, Technical Consulting R&D
62 Health Care and Social Assistance R&D
325 Chemical Manufacturing
1 R&D Industrial
334 Computer and Electronic Products Manufacturing R&D Office, Industrial 311 Food Manufacturing
1 R&D Industrial
52 Finance and Insurance Office
53 Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing Office
55 Management of Companies and Enterprises Office
56 Administrative, Support, Waste Management, & Remediation Services Office R&D 511 Newspaper, periodical, book, and directory publishers Office 512 Motion picture and sound recording insutries Office 515 Broadcasting, excluding internet Office
517 Telecommunications Office
518 Internet Service Providers, Web Search Portals, & Data Processing Services Office 519 Other information services Office
61 Educational Services Office
813 Religious, grantmaking, civic, professional similar Office 441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers Commercial
442 Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores Commercial
443 Electronics and Appliance Stores Commercial
444 Building Material and Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealers Commercial 445 Food and Beverage Stores Commercial
446 Health and Personal Care Stores Commercial
447 Gasoline Stations Commercial
448 Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores Commercial 451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, and Music Stores Commercial 452 General Merchandise Stores Commercial
453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers Commercial
71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Commercial
72 Accommodation and Food Services Commercial
236 Construction of Buildings Industrial
237 Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction Industrial 238 Specialty Trade Contractors Industrial
811 Repair and Maintenance Industrial
454 Nonstore retailers
1 Industrial
312 Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing Industrial 313 Textile Mills Industrial
314 Textile Product Mills Industrial
315 Apparel Manufacturing Industrial
316 Leather and Allied Product Manufacturing Industrial 321 Wood Product Manufacturing Industrial
322 Paper Manufacturing Industrial
323 Printing and Related Support Activities Industrial
324 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing Industrial 326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing Industrial 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing Industrial 331 Primary Metal Manufacturing Industrial
332 Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing Industrial
333 Machinery Manufacturing Industrial
335 Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing Industrial 336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing Industrial
337 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing Industrial 339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industrial R&D
423 Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods Industrial
424 Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods
1 Industrial
425 Wholesale Electronic Markets and Agents and Brokers Industrial 48 Transportation & Warehousing Industrial
22 Utilities Industrial
1Category contains Cannabis related businesses including warehousing, manufacturing, retail sale, and delivery.

Source: Moody's Analytics, NAICS Association, RSG

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1825
28 APPENDIX 5: HOUSING FORECAST
Year
Housing Element
Cycle and Year of
Cycle
Unit
Production
(Rounded)
Housing
Element
Cycle Unit
Production Forecast Source
2023 6th Cycle Year 1 0 City Development Pipeline
2024 6th Cycle Year 2 50 City Development Pipeline
2025 6th Cycle Year 3 37 City Development Pipeline
2026 6th Cycle Year 4 242 City Development Pipeline
2027 6th Cycle Year 5 711 Housing Element Table 4.5-3 (page 139) 2028 6th Cycle Year 6 711 Housing Element Table 4.5-3 (page 139) 2029 6th Cycle Year 7 711 Housing Element Table 4.5-3 (page 139) 2030 6th Cycle Year 8 711 3173 Housing Element Table 4.5-3 (page 139) 2031 7th Cycle Year 1 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2032 7th Cycle Year 2 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2033 7th Cycle Year 3 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2034 7th Cycle Year 4 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2035 7th Cycle Year 5 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2036 7th Cycle Year 6 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2037 7th Cycle Year 7 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2038 7th Cycle Year 8 342 2735 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2039 8th Cycle Year 1 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2040 8th Cycle Year 2 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2041 8th Cycle Year 3 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2042 8th Cycle Year 4 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2043 8th Cycle Year 5 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2044 8th Cycle Year 6 342 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) 2045 8th Cycle Year 7 342 2393 6th Cycle RHNA allocation (Housing Element Table 4.5-1, page 132) Total 8301
Source: City of San Carlos, RSG
Figures are rounded.

Note: RSG assumed that the RHNA allocation for the 7th and 8th Cycles would be the same as the RHNA allocation for the 6th Cycle (2,735 units). The buildout forecast includes seven of eight years covered under the 8th Housing Element Cycle.

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1826
29 APPENDIX 6: MTC/ABAG REGIONAL PROJECTIONS
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (“MTC”) and Association of Bay Area Governments (“ABAG”) prepared the Plan Bay Area 2050 report, a 30-year long-range plan projecting household, population, and job growth throughout the nine-county Bay Area region for the purpose of developing strategies for growing housing inventory, economic activity, transportation, and the environment. Plan Bay Area 2050 suggests that the region will add 2.5 million people, about 940,000 new households, and 1.4 million jobs by 2050. Table 22 presents the current and projected population, households and jobs in the nine-county Bay Area region.

TABLE 22: REGIONAL POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS, AND JOBS
MTC and ABAG are currently preparing Plan Bay Area 2050+, which is a limited and focused update to the region’s long-term plan and will guide the growth of the nine-county Bay Area. In June 2024, MTC and ABAG published a Draft Blueprint Compendium which outlines and updates projected growth patterns at the county and sub-county Levels. The South San Mateo subcounty level includes San Carlos, Atherton, Menlo Park, Redwood City, Woodside, East Palo Alto, and Portola Valley. The Draft Blueprint Compendium indicates that the South San Mateo sub-county level will add 20,000 new households and 86,000 new jobs by 2050. The Draft Blueprint Compendium does not provide updates to population projections. Table 23 outlines the present households and jobs for the South San Mateo sub-county level.

TABLE 23: SOUTH SAN MATEO SUB-COUNTY LEVEL HOUSEHOLDS AND JOBS

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1827
Balancing Functionality and Livability since 1995
w-trans.com

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
April 21, 2025
Prepared for the City of San Carlos
Submitted by
W-Trans
Traffic Operations Analysis for the
General Plan Reset Project

12.b
May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1828

i Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 2025
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................................2 Transportation Setting.............................................................................................................................................................3 Capacity Analysis.......................................................................................................................................................................7 Conclusions and Recommendations............................................................................................................................... 20 Study Participants and References................................................................................................................................... 21 Figures

1. Study Area ....................................................................................................................................................................................4

2. Existing Lane Configurations.................................................................................................................................................5

3. Existing Traffic Volumes.........................................................................................................................................................11

4. Cumulative 2045 General Plan Traffic Volumes.............................................................................................................15

5. Cumulative 2045 General Plan Reset Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................16 Tables

1. Signalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria..............................................................................................................7

2. Arterial Segment Level of Service Thresholds..................................................................................................................8

3. Freeway Segment Level of Service Thresholds................................................................................................................8

4. C/CAG Roadway Segments Level of Service .....................................................................................................................9

5. Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service.........................................................................................................12

6. Existing Peak Hour Roadway Segment Levels of Service ...........................................................................................12

7. Existing Peak Hour Roadway Segment Levels of Service ...........................................................................................13

8. Projected Net Change.............................................................................................................................................................14

9. Cumulative 2045 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service.......................................................................................17

10. Cumulative Peak Hour Roadway Segment Levels of Service ....................................................................................19

11. Cumulative Peak Hour Freeway Segment Levels of Service......................................................................................19 Appendices
A. Traffic Counts
B. Intersection Level of Service Calculations (Existing Conditions) C. Intersection Level of Service Calculations (Cumulative 2045 General Plan Conditions) D. Intersection Level of Service Calculations (Cumulative General Plan Reset Conditions) E. Intersection Level of Service Calculations (Near-Term plus Project Conditions) F. Intersection Level of Service Calculations (Cumulative plus Project Conditions)

1 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Executive Summary
The proposed project includes the adoption and implementation of the 2045 General Plan Reset for the City of San Carlos. New housing is expected around Downtown, on infill parcels along the El Camino Real corridor, Old County Road between Holly Street and Terminal Avenue, and East San Carlos Avenue. It is likely that most units would be multiple family residences, such as apartments, townhouses, or condominiums. New detached residences may occur as accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and as rebuilt or remodeled homes in existing singlefamily neighborhoods. Commercial growth would also be expected under the General Plan Reset, primarily in the Downtown area. Office growth would occur Downtown, and in the Northeast, while industrial growth and research and development expansion is only expected in the east side of the City. The proposed project does not involve changes to the land use designations or map.

This report contains an analysis of existing conditions and two cumulative (2045) scenarios. For the cumulative scenarios, the City’s Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program was referenced to incorporate any potential improvements to the study intersections.

Twelve intersections were evaluated for this study, some of which are expected to operate at deficient Levels of Service (LOS) under the City’s General Plan LOS policy with or without the change in number of trips associated with implementation of the General Plan Reset.

The roadway segment of El Camino Real between San Carlos’ northern City Limits and San Carlos Avenue was assessed and is expected to operate at a sufficient Level of Service per the City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) Congestion Management Program (CMP) guidelines, which are based on the volume to capacity ratio (V/C).

The freeway segment of US 101 between the SR 92 and Whipple Road interchanges was also analyzed using standards outlined in the C/CAG 2023 CMP Guidelines. Under the analyzed scenarios, this freeway segment would operate acceptably, or when deficient operation occurred, it would operate under significant and unavoidable conditions.
2 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Introduction
This report presents an analysis of the potential effects on traffic operation that would be associated with the implementation of the proposed 2045 General Plan Resetin the City of San Carlos. The traffic study was completed in accordance with the criteria established by the City of San Carlos in their Transportation Study Guidelines and is consistent with standard traffic engineering techniques. The operational analysis presented in this report is not intended for use in evaluating transportation impacts under the guidelines set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Prelude
The purpose of thisstudy is to provide City staff and policy makers with data that they can use to make an informed decision regarding the potential effects on traffic operation associated with the proposed General Plan Reset, and any associated improvements that would be required in order to reduce these effects to an acceptable level according to the City’s current General Plan or other policies. While no longer a part of the CEQA review process, vehicular traffic service levels at key intersections were evaluated for consistency with General Plan policies by determining the number of new trips that the proposed use would be expected to generate, distributing these trips to the surrounding street system based on anticipated travel patterns specific to the General Plan Reset, then analyzing the impact the new traffic would be expected to have on the study intersections.

Project Profile
The proposed project includes the implementation of projected development associated with the 2045 General Plan Reset. Level of Service (LOS) and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) were assessed for the transportation network under existing conditions, cumulative conditions under the currently adopted General Plan, and cumulative conditions under the General Plan Reset.
3 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Transportation Setting
Operational Analysis
Study Area and Periods
The study area includes the following intersections.

1. El Camino Real/Holly Street*

2. Old County Road/Holly Street

3. Industrial Road/Holly Street

4. El Camino Real/San Carlos Avenue*

5. El Camino Real/Brittan Avenue*

6. Old County Road/Brittan Avenue

7. Industrial Road/Brittan Avenue

8. El Camino Real/Howard Avenue

9. Old County Road/Howard Avenue

10. San Carlos Avenue/Dartmouth Avenue-Club Drive

11. Alameda de las Pulgas/San Carlos Avenue

12. Alameda de las Pulgas/Brittan Avenue
Operating conditions during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods were evaluated to capture the highest potential change in operations related to the proposed project as well as the highest volumes on the local transportation network. The morning peak hour occurs between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and reflects conditions during the home to work or school commute, while the p.m. peak hour occurs between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. and typically reflects the highest level of congestion during the homeward bound commute.

Study Intersections
The locations of the study intersections and the existing lane configurations and controls are shown in Figures 1 and 2. For this study, El Camino Real and other parallel streets are defined as generally aligning in the North-South direction. A detailed description of each intersection is provided below.

El Camino Real/Holly Street is a four–legged signalized intersection with protected left-turn phasing on all four approaches. Crosswalks and associated pedestrian signal heads are present on all four legs.

Old County Road/Holly Street is a four-legged signalized intersection with split phasing on the eastbound and westbound Holly Street approaches and protected left-turn phasing on the Old County Road approaches.

Crosswalks and associated pedestrian signal heads are present on the north, south, and east legs. There are bicycle lanes along Old County Road.

Industrial Road/Holly Street is a four-legged signalized intersection with protected left-turn phasing on the northbound and southbound Industrial Road approaches; the northbound approach also has right-turn overlap phasing. There is split phasing on the eastbound and westbound Holly Street approaches. Crosswalks and associated pedestrian signal heads are present on the north, south, and west legs. Bicycle route pavement markings are present on the east side of the north leg and there are bicycle lanes on the west side of the north leg, and both sides of the south and east legs.

El Camino Real/San Carlos Avenue is a signalized tee intersection with protected left-turn phasing on the northbound approach and protected U-turns on the southbound approach. Crosswalks and associated pedestrian signal phasing are present on all three legs.

El Camino Real/Brittan Avenue is a four-legged signalized intersection with protected left-turn phasing on the northbound and southbound El Camino Real approaches and split-phasing on the eastbound and westbound Brittan Avenue approaches. Crosswalks and associated pedestrian signal heads are present on all four legs.

General Plan Reset
sca039.ai 8/24
Figure 1 – Study Area
Study Intersection
LEGEND
E
l
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Old Country Rd
I
nd
u
st
ri
a
l
Rd
Brittan Ave
Holly St
S an Carlos Ave
Howard Ave
Ala
meda
de
las
Pulgas
Club Dr
North
Not to Scale
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
10 11
12 82
General Plan Reset
sca039.ai 10/24
El C
a
min
o
R
e
al
Old Country Rd
Ind
u
strial Rd
Brittan Ave
Holly St
S an Carlos Ave
Howard Ave
Ala
meda
de las
Pulgas
Club Dr
North
Not to Scale
1 2 3
4 5 6 7
8 9
10 11
12 82
Figure 2 – Existing Lane Configurations
(xx) PM Peak Hour Volume
xx AM Peak Hour Volume
Study Intersection
LEGEND
1 4
2 3
5 6
7 8 9
11 12
SLOW
SCHOOL
10 6
Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Old County Road/Brittan Avenue is a four-legged signalized intersection with split phasing on the eastbound and westbound Brittan Avenue approaches. The northbound and southbound Old County Road approaches have permitted left-turn phasing. There are crosswalks and associated pedestrian signal heads on all four legs and bicycle lanes on Old County Road, with bicycle detection on all four approaches.

Industrial Road/Brittan Avenue is a four-legged signalized intersection. There are protected left turns on the northbound and southbound Industrial Road approaches, and split phasing on the eastbound and westbound Brittan Avenue approaches. Crosswalks and associated pedestrian signal phasing are present on all four legs.

Bicycle lanes are present along Industrial Road.

El Camino Real/Howard Avenue is a signalized four-legged intersection with protected left-turn phasing on the northbound and southbound El Camino Real approaches and split phasing on the eastbound and westbound Howard Avenue approaches. The intersection has crosswalks and associated pedestrian signal phasing on all four legs.

Old County Road/Howard Avenue is a signalized four-legged intersection with protected left-turn phasing on the northbound and southbound Old County Road approaches and split phasing on the eastbound and westbound Howard Avenue approaches. Crosswalks and associated pedestrian signal phasing are present on all four legs. Bicycle route markings are present along Old County Road and on the east leg.

San Carlos Avenue/Dartmouth Avenue-Club Drive is a signalized intersection with four legs and protected leftturn phasing on the eastbound and westbound approaches of San Carlos Avenue. On the Dartmouth Avenue and Club Drive approaches, protected-permissive left-turn phasing is provided. Marked pedestrian crossings are located on the north, west, and south legs of the intersection, alongside the provision of accessible curb ramps.

Two bus stops are located near the intersection, on the east and west approaches of San Carlos Avenue.

Alameda de las Pulgas/San Carlos Avenue is a signalized tee-intersection with protected phasing for all leftturn movements. A northbound right-turn overlap also runs concurrently with the westbound left-turn phase.

Marked crosswalks are provided on the east and south intersection legs. Painted green bike lanes are present on all legs, along with bike boxes at the northbound and westbound intersection approaches.

Alameda de las Pulgas/Brittan Avenue is a four-legged, signalized intersection with protected left-turn phasing on all approaches. The west leg of Brittain Avenue is split by a 20-foot-wide raised median. Marked crosswalks are present on all four legs, and Class II bike lanes are present on the north, east, and south legs. 7 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Capacity Analysis
Intersection Level of Service Methodologies
Level of Service (LOS) is used to rank traffic operation on various types of facilities based on traffic volumes and roadway capacity using a series of letter designations ranging from A to F. Generally, Level of Service A represents free flow conditions and Level of Service F represents forced flow or breakdown conditions. A unit of measure that indicates a level of delay generally accompanies the LOS designation.

The study intersections were analyzed using methodologies published in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2016 or the Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000 in cases where the HCM6 could not replicate and analyze the condition. This source contains methodologies for various types of intersection control, all of which are related to a measurement of delay in average number of seconds per vehicle.

The study intersections are all controlled by traffic signals so were evaluated using the signalized methodology from the HCM. This methodology is based on factors including traffic volumes, green time for each movement, phasing, whether the signals are coordinated or not, truck traffic, and pedestrian activity. Average stopped delay per vehicle in seconds is used as the basis for evaluation in this LOS methodology. For purposes of this study, delays were calculated using signal timing obtained from the City of San Carlos and Caltrans. The intersection of El Camino Real/San Carlos Avenue includes an exclusive pedestrian phase that can be modeled with HCM 2000 methodology but not the HCM, 6th Edition; as a result, delay for this intersection was determined using HCM 2000 methodology. The intersection of Industrial Road/Brittan Avenue includes a shared left-turn/through lane in a Cumulative Scenario under mitigation and was analyzed using HCM 2000 methodology in all scenarios to maintain consistency.

The ranges of delay associated with the various levels of service are indicated in Table 1.

Table 1 – Signalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria LOS A Delay of 0 to 10 seconds. Most vehicles arrive during the green phase, so do not stop at all.

LOS B Delay of 10 to 20 seconds. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, but many drivers still do not have to stop.

LOS C Delay of 20 to 35 seconds. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many still pass through without stopping.

LOS D Delay of 35 to 55 seconds. The influence of congestion is noticeable, and most vehicles have to stop.

LOS E Delay of 55 to 80 seconds. Most, if not all, vehicles must stop and drivers consider the delay excessive.

LOS F Delay of more than 80 seconds. Vehicles may wait through more than one cycle to clear the intersection.

Reference: Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2016 Arterial Level of Service Methodology
Levels of Service for arterial roadway segments were evaluated in accordance with the C/CAG CMP guidelines which are based on the V/C ratio. Volumes in each direction are divided by the capacity, estimated to be 1,100 vehicles per hour per lane to derive the V/C ratio. The correlation between LOS threshold and the volume-tocapacity ratios for freeway segments is summarized in Table 2. 8 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Table 2 - Arterial Segment Level of Service Thresholds
LOS V/C Ratio
A Less than 0.6
B 0.61 - 0.70
C 0.71 - 0.80
D 0.81 - 0.90
E 0.91 - 1.00
F 1.00 or greater
Reference: Highway Capacity Manual: Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2009, as detailed in the C/CAG 2023 CMP Freeway Segment Level of Service Methodology
Freeway segments were evaluated in accordance with C/CAG CMP guidelines. The measure of effectiveness used to evaluate freeway segments is based on density of vehicles, expressed in passenger cars per mile per lane and V/C ratios. The correlation between LOS threshold and the V/C ratios for freeway segments is summarized in Table

3. Table 3 - Freeway Segment Level of Service Thresholds LOS V/C Ratio
A Less than 0.283
B 0.283 - 0.457
C 0.457 - 0.673
D 0.673 - 0.849
E 0.849 - 1.00
F 1.00 or greater
Reference: Highway Capacity Manual: Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2009, as detailed in the C/CAG 2023 CMP Traffic Operation Standards
The following operational standards were used to identify adverse effects on traffic operation in the study area and do not identify impacts for purposes of the CEQA process.

Caltrans does not have a standard of significance relative to operation as this is no longer a CEQA issue. The new Vehicle Miles Traveled-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide (TISG), California Department of Transportation, 2020, replaced the Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, 2002. As indicated in the TISG, the Department is transitioning away from requesting LOS or other vehicle operations analyses of land use projects and will instead focus on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Adequacy of operation was therefore evaluated using local agency standards.
9 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Intersections
According to the City of San Carlos Transportation Study Guidelines, 2024, the City maintains a standard of LOS D for intersections. If the existing LOS is E or F, a project would have an adverse impact on operations if the LOS worsens by a letter grade or if the total volume at the study intersection increases by five percent or more due to project trip generation. Analysis should be conducted using the latest version of the HCM.

For queueing, the Guidelines state that a deficiency would occur if a project would cause the 95th percentile vehicle queue length to exceed the existing or planned length of a turn pocket or freeway off-ramp. If queue lengths already exceed the available storage length, a project would cause a deficiency by increasing the queue by more than 50 feet.

Freeway Segments
The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County monitors the freeway segments within the study area. The C/CAG 2023 CMP states that the standard for US 101 freeway segments within the study area is LOS E.

Roadway Segments
LOS standards for roadway segments were established by C/CAG and published in the 2023 CMP Monitoring Report.

Following are the LOS standards for roadway segments in San Mateo County. • If the existing (1990/1991) LOS was F, then the standard was set to be LOS F. • If the existing or future LOS was or will be E, then the standard was set to be LOS E.

Table 4 provides a summary of the standards of significance for the study area segments. If a roadway segment operates unacceptably without the addition of project-generated traffic, the project’s effect would be considered adverse if the V/C ratio increases by 0.01 or more. This approach is consistent with the standards that were applied to other impact analyses recently completed for projects in the City of San Carlos.

Table 4 – C/CAG Roadway Segments Level of Service
Route
Segment
Direction Roadway
Type
Estimated Capacity
(vph)
LOS
Standard
US 101
SR 92 to Whipple Ave SB Freeway 13,8001 E
Whipple Ave to SR 92 NB Freeway 11,0002 E
SR 82 (El Camino Real)
San Carlos City Limit to San Carlos Ave SB Arterial 2,2003 E San Carlos Ave to San Carlos City Limit NB Arterial 2,2003 E San Carlos Ave to Whipple Ave SB Arterial 3,3003 E
Whipple Ave to San Carlos Ave NB Arterial 2,2003 E
Note: 1 Freeway capacity is 2,200 vehicles per hour per lane for five-lane segments 2 Freeway capacity is 2,300 vehicles per hour per lane for six-lane segments 3 Arterial capacity is 1,100 vehicles per hour per lane 10 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Existing Conditions
The Existing Conditions scenario provides an evaluation of current operation based on existing traffic volumes gathered during several months in 2023 during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. This condition does not include project-generated traffic volumes. Volume data was collected while local schools were in session. Copies of the traffic count data sheets are provided in Appendix A.

Intersection Levels of Service
Under existing conditions, most study intersections operate at acceptable Levels of Service during both peak hours. Old County Road/Holly Street, Old County Road/Brittan Avenue and Old County Road/Howard Avenue currently operate unacceptably at LOS E or F during both the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. Industrial Road/Holly Street also operates at a deficient LOS E during the p.m. peak hour. The existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure

3. A summary of the intersection Level of Service calculations is contained in Table 5, and copies are provided in Appendix B.

1. El Camino Real/Holly St 42.6 D 39.2 D

2. Old County Rd/Holly St 59.1 E 62.0 E

3. Industrial Rd/Holly St 35.1 D 48.1 E

4. El Camino Real/San Carlos Ave* 33.4 C 27.4 C

5. El Camino Real/Brittan Ave 34.4 C 36.1 D

6. Old County Rd/Brittan Ave 176.3 F 157.0 F

7. Industrial Rd/Brittan Ave* 35.9 D 41.0 D

8. El Camino Real/Howard Ave 26.7 D 28.1 C

9. Old County Rd/Howard Ave 58.4 E 160.6 F

10. San Carlos Ave/Club Dr-Dartmouth Ave 31.1 C 36.9 D

11. Alameda de las Pulgas/San Carlos Ave 15.6 B 15.3 B

12. Alameda de las Pulgas/Brittan Ave 27.3 C 35.5 D
Note: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service; * = the study intersection was analyzed under HCM 2000 criteria due to exclusive phasing; Bold text = deficient operation Roadway Segment Levels of Service
Under existing conditions, all analyzed segments of SR 82 (El Camino Real) operate acceptably in each direction during both peak hours evaluated. A summary of the roadway segment LOS calculations is shown in Table 6 and Appendix E for further reference.

Table 6 – Existing Peak Hour Roadway Segment Levels of Service Roadway Direction AM Peak PM Peak
Study Segment V/C LOS V/C LOS
SR 82 (El Camino Real)
San Carlos City Limit to San Carlos Ave SB 0.453 A 0.531 A San Carlos Ave to San Carlos City Limit NB 0.319 A 0.454 A San Carlos Ave to Whipple Ave SB 0.293 A 0.375 A
Whipple Ave to San Carlos Ave NB 0.316 A 0.404 A
Note: V/C = Volume to Capacity; LOS = Level of Service
Freeway Segment Levels of Service
Under existing conditions, the segment of all lanes on US 101 between SR 92 and Whipple Avenue operates acceptably in each direction during both peak hours evaluated. A summary of the freeway segment level of service calculations is shown in Table 7 and detailed in Appendix F. 13 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Table 7 – Existing Peak Hour Freeway Segment Levels of Service Freeway Direction AM Peak PM Peak
Study Segment V/C LOS V/C LOS
US 101
SR 92 to Whipple Ave SB 0.645 C 0.597 C
Whipple Ave to SR 92 NB 0.647 C 0.696 C
Note: V/C = Volume to Capacity; LOS = Level of Service
Cumulative Conditions
Segment volumes for the horizon year of 2045 were obtained from an updated version of the County’s travel demand model and translated to turning movement volumes at each of the study intersections using the “Furness” method. The Furness method is an iterative process that employs existing turn movement data, existing link volumes and future link volumes to project likely turning future movement volumes at intersections. These future traffic demand projections assumed the build out of the current General Plan.

Intersection geometry for the cumulative year analysis was assumed to be unchanged from near-term conditions.

Also, intersection improvements identified in the City of San Carlos Traffic Impact Fee Plan, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., 2015, (and updated in 2020) for intersections included in the study area, were not assumed as being complete for the cumulative analysis since the status of each improvement is uncertain.

Project Description
The proposed project does not involve changes to the land use designations or map. The majority of new housing in San Carlos is expected on infill parcels near Downtown, along the El Camino Real corridor, along Old County Road between Holly Street and Terminal Avenue, and along East San Carlos Avenue. These units would mostly be multiple family residences, such as apartments, townhouses, or condominiums. New detached residences would likely occur as accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and as rebuilt or remodeled homes in existing single-family neighborhoods.

Most of the commercial growth is expected to occur in the Downtown area. Most of the office growth is expected in the Downtown and Northeast areas. Research and development and industrial growth would be limited to the east side area of San Carlos.

The present analysis is intended to review potential transportation effects associated with the adoption and implementation of the proposed General Plan under Cumulative 2045 Conditions. Thisreport contains a programlevel traffic operations analysis and does not include review of the effects of specific, individual developments that may be allowed in the future under the proposed project. Each future project may necessitate additional environmental review, as required by CEQA, to secure any necessary discretionary development permits.

The projected net change in land use intensities related to the 2045 General Plan Reset as compared to other adopted plans and approved projects is summarized in Table 8. 14 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Table 8 – Projected Net Change
Category
Net Change
from Pipeline
Development
Projects
Net Change
from
Downtown
Specific Plan
Net Change
from
Northeast
Area Specific
Plan
Additional
Net Change
Total
Projected Net
Change
Housing Units 242 1,565 1,890 4,063 8,300
Population 462 2,990 3,611 8,557 15,620
Non-Residential Square Footage 2,688,000 420,820 4,178,228 1,640,252 8,927,300 Jobs 8,525 908 12,990 4,107 26,530
Source: Placeworks, 2024
Intersection Levels of Service
Under the anticipated future volumes with the current General Plan, five of the study intersections are expected to operate unacceptably during one or both peak periods. Upon the implementation of the proposed General Plan Reset, six of the study intersections are expected to operate unacceptably at LOS E or F conditions.

Cumulative volumes are shown in Figures 4 and 5, while operating conditions are shown in Table 9. Copies of the calculations are provided in Appendices C and D.

General Plan Reset
sca039.ai 10/24
E
l
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Old Country Rd
I
nd
u
st
ri
a
l
Rd
Brittan Ave
Holly St
S an Carlos Ave
Howard Ave
Ala
meda
de
las
Pulgas
Club Dr
North
Not to Scale
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
10 11
12 82
Figure 4 - Cumulative 2045 General Plan Traffic Volumes (xx) PM Peak Hour Volume
xx AM Peak Hour Volume
Study Intersection
LEGEND
131(242)259(624)421(648)
(42)85
(208)559
(61)22
37(70)
561(649)
168(147)
(70)55
(695)586
(390)501
1 64(32)
606(1081)67(35)
(61)176
(582)763
(87)283
131(293)
310(294)
54(128)
(101)56
(376)153
(201)131
2 464(397)
633(790)482(380)
(99)25
(730)847
(118)202
79(324)
341(823)
296(504)
(143)21
(537)716
(729)372
3 (546)250
(343)735
326(701)
665(806)
(203)439
(856)573
4 92(161)
255(422)188(326)
(57)41
(321)402
(88)50
45(69)
641(704)
262(211)
(90)58
(658)661
(62)230
5 34(223)
183(202)51(59)
(139)114
(102)162
(33)83
27(173)
465(945)
47(12)
(143)196
(460)908
(53)72
6 336(103)340(293)257(166)
(41)32
(275)402
(211)610
72(615)
169(390)
70(319)
(239)73
(834)494
(105)75
7 75(124)
67(228)160(282)
(152)46
(164)277
(63)79
29(92)
771(999)
69(64)
(36)119
(710)751
(205)272
8 54(104)
72(154)71(171)
(103)64
(88)73
(19)60
11(24)
186(711)
173(44)
(198)232
(213)608
(55)127
9 103(44)501(543)40(22)
(163)170
(691)271
(66)109
156(96)
61(32)
114(54)
(210)192
(21)76
(24)43
10 466(552)174(304)
(306)242
(415)573
(313)248
(281)333
11 72(138)
231(337)163(135)
(40)134
(228)224
(115)185
117(195)
380(435)
109(118)
(75)53
(413)450
(98)84
12 General Plan Reset
sca039.ai 10/24
E
l
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Old Country Rd
I
nd
u
st
ri
a
l
Rd
Brittan Ave
Holly St
S an Carlos Ave
Howard Ave
Ala
meda
de
las
Pulgas
Club Dr
North
Not to Scale
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
10 11
12 82
Figure 5 – Cumulative 2045 General Plan Reset Traffic Volumes (xx) PM Peak Hour Volume
xx AM Peak Hour Volume
Study Intersection
LEGEND
131(242)259(684)421(776)
(33)71
(208)608
(61)22
37(50)
561(643)
168(147)
(35)68
(695)579
(390)557
1 106(19)
606(1194)110(30)
(61)219
(582)756
(87)356
131(362)
222(287)
54(123)
(154)56
(311)150
(240)130
2 570(325)
633(812)482(332)
(91)25
(777)847
(101)268
178(334)
303(714)
258(555)
(196)21
(577)698
(729)372
3 (578)255
(343)700
312(738)
665(856)
(198)391
(856)664
4 94(193)
255(445)188(319)
(46)41
(321)415
(88)50
45(79)
641(792)
262(214)
(71)58
(658)623
(62)274
5 119(227)
183(202)123(59)
(139)157
(102)185
(32)73
27(251)
415(948)
35(12)
(143)196
(478)877
(53)91
6 759(122)384(293)310(166)
(41)32
(275)417
(230)546
66(644)
148(384)
46(399)
(239)73
(881)483
(105)80
7 75(124)
67(248)160(282)
(159)39
(164)293
(64)78
35(90)
771(1046)
69(64)
(34)110
(710)748
(205)290
8 81(133)
72(164)71(123)
(103)64
(88)93
(19)78
11(32)
185(640)
233(105)
(198)232
(205)566
(55)116
9 103(44)528(711)33(22)
(143)173
(733)347
(62)93
169(84)
51(30)
114(51)
(182)174
(18)76
(23)43
10 453(574)174(310)
(355)242
(409)588
(331)334
(272)333
11 72(150)
247(335)183(135)
(38)145
(211)229
(118)179
113(228)
387(464)
109(122)
(77)59
(466)474
(90)90
12 17 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Table 9 – Cumulative 2045 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection 2045 Current General Plan 2045 General Plan Reset AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
Avg
Delay
LOS Avg
Delay
LOS Avg
Delay
LOS Avg
Delay
LOS

1. El Camino Real/Holly St 33.2 C 51.8 D 32.7 C 56.5 E

2. Old County Rd/Holly St 73.3 E 102.1 F 59.0 E 106.1 F Restrict EBL/WBL Movements 70.5 E 74.5 E 44.4 D 77.3 E

3. Industrial Rd/Holly St 85.1 F 81.6 F 97.1 F 84.9 F
Add NBT Lane 60.1 E 76.6 E 61.7 E 77.6 E

4. El Camino Real/San Carlos Ave* 39.1 D 19.1 B 35.3 D 28.1 C

5. El Camino Real/Brittan Ave 26.3 C 34.7 C 26.3 C 31.2 C

6. Old County Rd/Brittan Ave 47.3 D 37.9 D 43.8 D 38.6 D

7. Industrial Rd/Brittan Ave * 69.4 E 62.4 E 119.8 F 67.1 E Add LT Lanes to Every Approach* 37.2 D 37.9 D 59.7 E 44.2 D

8. El Camino Real/Howard Ave 22.0 C 21.0 C 21.8 C 21.2 C

9. Old County Rd/Howard Ave 30.7 C 49.3 D 36.9 D 39.0 D

10. San Carlos Ave/Club Dr-Dartmouth Ave 158.4 F 32.1 C 172.7 F 42.8 D Convert NBL/T to NBL and NBR to NBT/R 156.4 F 29.6 C 171.1 F 41.6 D

11. Alameda de las Pulgas/San Carlos Ave 17.3 B 19.2 B 19.8 B 25.0 C

12. Alameda de las Pulgas/Brittan Ave 52.1 D 76.1 E 55.9 E 84.7 F Add NBR and SBR Lanes 44.6 D 58.2 E 49.7 D 64.9 E
Note: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service; * = the study intersection was analyzed under HCM 2000 criteria due to exclusive phasing; Bold text = deficient operation; Shaded cells = conditions with indicated improvements per City’s TIF
Among the twelve study intersections, five would experience deficient operation with Cumulative (2045) scenario traffic. Of these five intersections, each one has an identified improvement measure in the City of San Carlos Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program. These improvements are noted in Table 9 along with their resulting delay and service level. Even with the recommended TIF improvements, however, the five deficient intersections would not be improved enough to reach an acceptable LOS. As right-of-way constraints exist at each intersection limiting physical improvements, Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to encourage more sustainable modes of transportation, decrease the number of commuting vehicle trips, or shift trips to occur outside of peak hours are recommended to further improve traffic operations at the study intersections.

The intersection of El Camino Real/Holly Street is expected to operate at an unacceptable LOS E during the p.m. peak hour under the Cumulative General Plan Reset Scenario. The City’s TIF does not recommend physical improvements to the intersection due to right-of-way constraints. As this analysis already includes optimized signal timing and coordination settings (including cycle length, splits, and offsets), it was concluded that acceptable operation cannot be reasonably achieved without a reduction in traffic demand.

Old County Road/Holly Street would operate unacceptably at LOS E and F respectively during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under both the Cumulative and Cumulative with General Plan Reset scenarios. It is expected that the delay during the a.m. peak hour would decrease under the General Plan Reset, which could be attributed to a 18 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
decrease in cumulative volumes along the Old County Road approaches, when compared to the Cumulative 2045 General Plan volumes. This would improve operations at these approaches and decrease the overall intersection delay. The City’s 2020 TIF recommends the restriction of left-turn movements from Holly Street to Old County Road in the eastbound and westbound directions during peak hours, alongside modifications to existing hardware and signal timing. With these improvements, Old County Road/Holly Street would experience decreased delays during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under both Cumulative scenarios. With the proposed improvements, however, the a.m. peak period under the General Plan Reset would reach an acceptable LOS D, but all other scenarios would remain deficient at LOS E.

The intersection of Industrial Road/Holly Street would operate unacceptably between LOS E and LOS F under both Cumulative scenarios during both peak periods. The addition of a second northbound through lane is recommended in both the 2015 and 2020 TIF’s, which would require widening Holly Street north of Industrial Road and modifying the existing full cloverleaf interchange to a partial cloverleaf design at the US 101/Holly Street interchange. These recommended improvements would decrease delays, but the intersection would still experience a deficient LOS E during both peak periods and under both Cumulative scenarios.

Deficient operation is expected at Industrial Road/Brittan Avenue under both the Cumulative General Plan and Cumulative General Plan Reset scenarios. It is anticipated that under the General Plan Reset scenario, the p.m. peak hour delay would increase, as compared to the General Plan Scenario. The TIF-recommended addition of dedicated left-turn lanes at all approaches would improve delays during both peak hours under the Cumulative General Plan scenario, reaching an acceptable LOS D. Under the Cumulative General Plan Reset Scenario, delays would decrease, with the p.m. peak LOS reaching LOS D and the a.m. peak LOS remaining deficient at LOS E.

San Carlos Avenue/Club Drive-Dartmouth Avenue would operate at a deficient LOS F during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under both Cumulative scenarios. It is recommended per the City’s TIF that the existing northbound shared through/left-turn lane be converted to an exclusive left-turn lane and the existing northbound right-turn lane be converted to a shared through/right-turn lane. These improvements, alongside the prohibition of parking along the eastern side of Club Drive, would allow increased queuing space and nominal decrease to average delay, however, they would not change the intersection’s overall LOS under either Cumulative scenario. Additional physical improvements are not feasible due to right-of-way constraints. As this analysis already includes optimized signal timing, it was concluded that acceptable operation cannot be reasonably achieved.

The intersection of Alameda de las Pulgas/Brittan Avenue is expected to operate deficiently at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour under the Cumulative General Plan scenario. This intersection would also operate between LOS E and LOS F under the Cumulative General Plan Reset scenario during both peak periods. The recommended additions of right-turn lanes on Alameda de las Pulgas, updated striping and signal timing would decrease delays for all Cumulative scenarios. The a.m. peak hour scenarios would reach LOS D, while both Cumulative p.m. scenarios would maintain a deficient LOS E.

It is also noted that both Old County Road/Brittan Avenue and Old County Road/Howard Avenue, which operate deficiently under Existing Conditions, would be expected to operate at acceptable levels of service under the Cumulative Scenarios. This could be attributed to improved trip routing and balancing of volumes along Old County Road and the adjacent El Camino Real.

Finding – Under the Cumulative with General Plan scenario, five study intersections would operate at a deficient LOS, while six study intersections would operate deficiently under the Cumulative with General Plan Reset scenario.

Roadway Segment Levels of Service
Under Cumulative 2045 conditions, SR 82 is expected to operate acceptably in each direction during both peak hours evaluated. A summary of the roadway segment Level of Service calculations is shown in Table 10. 19 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Table 10 – Cumulative Peak Hour Roadway Segment Levels of Service Roadway 2045 Current General Plan 2045 General Plan Reset Study Segment AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS +/- V/C LOS +/-
SR 82 (El Camino Real)
San Carlos CL to San Carlos Ave 0.485 A 0.609 B 0.479 A -0.01 0.660 B 0.05 San Carlos Ave to San Carlos CL 0.336 A 0.454 A 0.333 A 0.00 0.454 A 0.00 San Carlos Ave to Whipple Ave 0.296 A 0.434 A 0.294 A 0.00 0.451 A 0.02 Whipple Ave to San Carlos Ave 0.411 A 0.408 A 0.410 A 0.00 0.408 A 0.00 Note: V/C = Volume to Capacity; LOS = Level of Service; CL = City Limit Freeway Segment Levels of Service
Upon the addition of traffic associated with the General Plan Reset to cumulative condition volumes, the study segments along US 101 would remain at LOS F in the northbound direction in the a.m. peak period. During all other Cumulative scenario peak hours the freeway segment would remain within the threshold at LOS E. As previously discussed, the City’s General Plan EIR identified that deficient Levels of Services along the freeway segments are considered significant and unavoidable as feasible mitigation improvements have not been identified. These results are summarized in Table 11.

Table 11 – Cumulative Peak Hour Freeway Segment Levels of Service Freeway 2045 Current General Plan 2045 General Plan Reset Study Segment AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS +/- V/C LOS +/-
US 101
SR 92 to Whipple Ave 0.891 E 0.885 D 0.902 E 0.011 0.909 E 0.024 Whipple Ave to SR 92 1.031 F 0.946 E 1.055 F 0.025 0.950 E 0.005 Note: V/C = Volume to Capacity; LOS = Level of Service
20 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusions
• As summarized in Table 9, under the Cumulative (2045) General Plan conditions, five of the twelve study intersections are expected to operate with deficient LOS. Under the Cumulative General Plan Reset scenario, six study intersections are expected to operate deficiently. • The addition of recommended improvements per the City’s TIF would decrease delays at five intersections.

However, deficient operation is still expected at six intersections during one or both peak periods under the two Cumulative scenarios even upon the implementation of the TIF-recommended improvements.

Identification of additional improvements are not feasible as right-of-way constraints exist at each intersection and signal timing is already optimized.
• Implementation of TDM measures could improve intersection operations by providing more access to alternative modes and sustainable transportation methods and thus reducing the total number of vehicle trips through study intersections.
• Under both the Cumulative General Plan and Cumulative General Plan Reset scenarios, the study roadway segments on SR 82 are expected to operate acceptably. All segments would maintain the same acceptable Levels of Service as existing, except for the segment from the San Carlos City Limit to San Carlos Avenue, which would experience decreased LOS from A to B during the p.m. peaks of each scenario. However, it is recognized that the LOS at intersections is evaluated separately from service levels along roadway segments, thereby making it possible for a particular roadway to experience simultaneously deficient service levels at an intersection and acceptable levels of service along roadway segments. As such, these segments continue to experience acceptable levels of service under all scenarios. • Under the Cumulative General Plan and the Cumulative General Plan Reset scenarios, the study freeway segments of US 101 are expected to decrease from LOS C to LOS E and F. As achieving acceptable operation on US 101 has been deemed infeasible by the City, the project’s effect on operation would be adverse but unavoidable.
21 Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 21, 2025
Study Participants and References
Study Participants
Principal in Charge Mark E. Spencer, PE (Traffic)
Senior Engineer Kenneth Jeong, PE (Traffic)
Associate Engineer Joseph Faria-Poynter, EIT
Graphics Jessica Bender
Editing/Formatting Jessica Bender, Rebecca Mansour
Quality Control Kevin Carstens, PE (Civil, Traffic)
References
City of San Carlos Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study, W-Trans, 2020 City of San Carlos Traffic Impact Fee Plan, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, 2015 City of San Carlos Transportation Study Guidelines, City of San Carlos, 2024 City of San Carlos Transportation Study Guidelines, City of San Carlos, 2024 Final San Mateo County Congestion Management Program 2015, City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County, 2015
Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, California Department of Transportation, 2002 Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2018 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000 Highway Capacity Manual: Special Report 2009, Transportation Research Board, 2009 San Carlos 2030 General Plan, City of San Carlos, 2009
Vehicle Miles Traveled-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide, California Department of Transportation, 2020 SCA039

A Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 2025
Appendix A
Traffic Counts

www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
2 3
5 6
11 2
4 8
41 1 0 3 6 0 15 4 25
16 12
Peak Hour 4 30 19 24 77 2 0
Count Total 9 61 37 46 153 2 1 1 0 4 9 4
8:45 AM 0 7 4 8 19 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 4
0 0 2 0 2 0
0 8:30 AM 1 8 3 4 16 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 2
8 0
8:15 AM 0 9 3 6 18 1 0
0 0 0 1 3 0
2 0 4
8:00 AM 3 6 9 6 24 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 2
1 7:30 AM 1 11 4 6 22 0 0 0
0 0 1 1 0 1
3 14 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 2 10 4 6 22
0 0 2
HV% - 0% 1% 0% - 0% 0% 2%
0 1
7:15 AM 2 4 5 7 18 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 1
West North South
7:00 AM 0 6 5
18 14 0 421 259 131 9 13 548 361 5 163 561
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
4% 2% 5% 2% 0% 1% 4% 0% 3%
Peak
Hour
All 0 22 441
215 10 23 888 676 8
6 6 0 0 10 9 0 2 22 0 77 0
37 2,985 0
HV 0 0 4 0 0
Count Total 0 51 678 31 0 725 445 269 957 52 5,028 0
0 83 53 30 3 3 142 89 0 39 133 8 696 2,985
49 146 15 762 2,960
8:45 AM 0 5 104 4
33 4 5 120 91 2
776 2,781
8:30 AM 0 7 129 1 0 107 53
0 115 72 40 2 2 153 92 0 34 141 8
41 141 6 751 2,444
8:15 AM 0 7 105 5
28 0 3 133 89 3
671 2,043
8:00 AM 0 3 103 4 0 116 81
0 110 70 21 1 3 119 80 2 32 131 5
28 105 5 583 0
7:45 AM 0 13 78 6
24 0 2 100 91 0
439 0
7:30 AM 0 7 69 8 0 83 61
0 62 28 13 0 3 73 78 1 27 95 3
19 65 2 350 0
7:15 AM 0 4 51 1
7:00 AM 0 5 39 2 0 49 27 26 0 2 48 66 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 04/25/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB 3.1% 0.90
TOTAL 2.6% 0.96
TH RT
WB 3.7% 0.89
NB 2.0% 0.93
Peak Hour: 8:00 AM 9:00 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.8% 0.87
0 2
0 0
00 01
0 0
0 0
15 4
0 6
N
El Camino Real
Holly St
Holly St
El Camino Real
Holly St El Camino Real
TEV: 2,985
PHF: 0.96
37 561
163
766
706
5 131
259
421
811
965
0 548361
13 1,005
931
9 14
441
22 477
309
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 2 0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1
0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 LT TH
0 1 0 0 0 0 3
0 1 0 0 4 0
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3
0 2
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
2 8:30 AM
0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1 2
8:15 AM
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 8:00 AM
0 0 0 0
0 0
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 7:30 AM
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0
0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0
RT
77 0
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 18 6 6 0 0 10 9 0 2 22 0

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
4 42 0 153 0
Peak Hour 0 0 4 0
Count Total 0 1 8 0 0 41 12 8 0 0 20 17 0
0 6 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 7 0 19 77
0 4 0 16 80
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 2 1 0
18 86
8:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 3 2
0 6 2 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 5 0
0 6 0 24 86
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 3 6 0
22 76
8:00 AM 0 0 3 0 0 3 2
0 6 4 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 5 0
0 6 0 22 0
7:45 AM 0 1 1 0
0 0 0 4 0 0
18 0
7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 9 2
0 4 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 7 0
1 2 0 14 0
7:15 AM 0 0 2 0
2 0 0 2 3 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
6 2
3 4
10 9
1 1
36 1 0 6 8 0 11 2 21
20 3
Peak Hour 0 5 11 13 29 0 5
Count Total 6 15 38 20 79 1 7 2 0 10 12 1
5:45 PM 0 2 2 3 7 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0 0 1
0 5:30 PM 0 1 2 3 6 0 3 0
0 0 0 3 0 6
5 1
5:15 PM 0 0 2 2 4 0 0
2 0 0 2 4 0
0 2 0
5:00 PM 0 2 5 5 12 0
0 1 0 0 1 2
0 2 0
0 4:30 PM 1 3 9 3 16 0 1 0
1 0 1 1 0 1
1 14 1
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 0 1 7 1 9
0 1 1
HV% - 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 1%
4 1
4:15 PM 5 0 4 2 11 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 1
West North South
4:00 PM 0 6 7
2 26 0 501 272 242 6 21 695 390 17 130 642
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 3% 1% 0% 1%
Peak
Hour
All 0 61 208
442 13 36 1,358 727 30
1 2 0 0 6 5 0 4 9 0 29 0
45 3,256 0
HV 0 0 0 0 0
Count Total 0 126 416 60 0 969 526 257 1,265 94 6,319 0 0 121 71 57 1 6 164 77 6 17 158 19 764 3,256
33 166 7 826 3,243
5:45 PM 0 12 46 9
71 4 9 167 106 1
830 3,174
5:30 PM 0 14 56 5 0 136 51
0 114 79 54 0 4 188 103 6 41 155 8
39 163 11 836 3,132
5:15 PM 0 20 52 6
60 1 2 176 104 4
751 3,063
5:00 PM 0 15 54 6 0 130 71
0 115 69 49 0 3 151 85 4 26 155 11
33 170 11 757 0
4:45 PM 0 14 63 6
44 3 8 175 75 0
788 0
4:30 PM 0 16 38 7 0 110 67
0 123 52 55 1 1 169 97 3 35 152 17
33 146 10 767 0
4:15 PM 0 23 51 9
4:00 PM 0 12 56 12 0 120 66 52 3 3 168 80 6

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 04/25/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB 1.6% 0.96
TOTAL 0.9% 0.97
TH RT
WB 0.5% 0.97
NB 1.0% 0.94
Peak Hour: 5:00 PM 6:00 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.0% 0.95
0 0
0 0
00 00
1 0
4 1
11 2
0 8
N
El Camino Real
Holly St
Holly St
El Camino Real
Holly St El Camino Real
TEV: 3,256
PHF: 0.97
45 642
130
834
1,015
17 242
272
501
1,015
728
0 695390
21 1,175
1,112
6 26
208
61 295
338
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 2 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 1 4 0
0 1 0 2 5 0
0 1 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 2 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 1 0 0 0 6
0 1 1 0 10 0
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6
3 6
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
4 5:30 PM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 5
5:15 PM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
4 5:00 PM
0 0 0 1
1 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
4:15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1 0
1 0 0
4:00 PM 1 0
RT
29 0
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 2 1 2 0 0 6 5 0 4 9 0

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
4 15 1 79 0
Peak Hour 0 0 0 0
Count Total 0 0 5 1 0 7 4 4 0 0 22 16 0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 7 29
0 3 0 6 31
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 1 0
4 41
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
2 3 0 12 48
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 3 2 0
9 50
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 1
0 3 0 16 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 5 4 0
11 0
4:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 0
0 1 0 14 0
4:15 PM 0 0 4 1
0 0 0 3 4 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 2

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

Total
9 7
5 6
6 6
4 7
50 23
Date: 03/01/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB 6.5% 0.82
TOTAL 3.6% 0.98
TH RT
WB 4.6% 0.95
NB 4.4% 0.99
Peak Hour: 8:00 AM 9:00 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.7% 0.93

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Old Country Rd Old Country Rd
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
0 10 115 3 0 12
6 9 19 261 0
7:15 AM 0 15 106 10
7:00 AM 0 11 97 9 0 6 63 0 0 10 19 12 0
18 23 34 451 0
7:45 AM 0 29 167 16
5 0 13 36 24 0
359 0
7:30 AM 0 16 141 11 0 6 124
26 20 0 13 18 11
554 1,625
8:00 AM 0 13 189 21 0 5 156
0 7 153 8 0 23 38 36 0 15 29 33
0 7 139 9 0 15
9 33 44 553 1,917
8:15 AM 0 21 185 19
3 0 21 30 29 0
12 31 30 569 2,234
8:45 AM 0 21 180 37
2 0 9 31 38 0
558 2,116
8:30 AM 0 26 202 24 0 13 151
32 33 0 19 43 36
0 11 160 3 0 11 37 30 0 14 30 21 555 2,235
Count Total 0 152 1,267 147 0 65 1,061 106 216 228 3,860 0 Peak
Hour
All 0 81 756
33 0 114 249 222 0
22 4 0 2 7 5 0 2 13 6 81 0
131 2,235 0
HV 0 2 11 3 0 4
101 0 36 606 17 0 56 130 130 0 54 137
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - 2% 1% 3% - 11% 4% 24% - 4% 5% 4% - 4% 9% 5% 4%
3 0
7:15 AM 3 3 2 1 9 0 0
0 2 0 2 6 0
West North South
7:00 AM 5 1 2 2 10 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 3 9 2 2 16
1 2 4 0 0 1
2 7:30 AM 3 3 3 4 13 0 0 1
0 0 0 4 0 1
1 1
8:15 AM 4 6 3 6 19 0 0
0 2 2 5 4 0
0 0 1
8:00 AM 4 8 1 3 16 1
0 0 1 1 2 5
8:45 AM 6 10 6 7 29
1 3 3 0 0 1
1 8:30 AM 2 6 4 5 17 0 0 2
2 2 4 5 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 4 0 2 1
7 8
Peak Hour 16 30 14 21 81 2 0
Count Total 30 46 23 30 129 2 0 10 7 19 35 0
6 5 13 16 0 3 4
1 0
1 0
50 06
0 0
0 0
3 4
0 16
N
Old Country Rd
Holly St
Holly St
Old Country
Rd
Holly StOld Country Rd
TEV: 2,235
PHF: 0.98
131
137
54 322
228
0 17
606
36 659
940
0 130
130
56 274
316
0 101
756
81 938
793
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Old Country Rd Old Country Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
0 1 1 10 0
7:15 AM 0 0 3 0
0 0 0 2 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 1

UT LT TH RT UT LT
9 0
7:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
0 2 6 1 0 0
0 2 2 13 0
7:45 AM 0 0 3 0
0 0 0 3 0 0
0 2 1 16 54
8:15 AM 0 1 2 1
0 0 0 0 1 0
16 48
8:00 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 8
1 1 0 1 1 0
19 64
8:30 AM 0 1 1 0 0 1 4
0 0 5 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 3
0 3 5 2 0 0
2 2 1 17 68
8:45 AM 0 0 4 2
1 0 1 2 1 0
4 2 0 0 6 1 29 81
3 18 9 129 0
Peak Hour 0 2 11 3
Count Total 0 2 25 3 0 7 34 5 0 2 14 7 0
7:00 AM 2 0
RT
81 0
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Old Country Rd Old Country Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 4 22 4 0 2 7 5 0 2 13 6

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
6 8:00 AM
0 1 0 2
2 0
7:45 AM
0 1 0 0
0 7:30 AM
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
3 14
8:45 AM
0 2 0 0
13 8:30 AM
0 2 0 0 2 0 4
5 9
8:15 AM
0 2 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 13
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 7
0 LT TH
0 6 0 0 5 0 13
0 10 0 0 19 0
1 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0 1 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0
0 1 0
0 2 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
9 6
5 5
9 13
4 6
57 25
Date: 03/01/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB 1.0% 0.84
TOTAL 1.5% 0.96
TH RT
WB 1.0% 0.98
NB 2.0% 0.94
Peak Hour: 4:00 PM 5:00 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 2.1% 0.88

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Old Country Rd Old Country Rd
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
0 8 189 6 0 21
9 31 36 597 0
4:15 PM 0 34 145 23
4:00 PM 0 22 172 14 0 10 193 1 0 26 58 25 0
8 37 46 565 0
4:45 PM 0 10 134 11
4 0 23 50 36 0
598 0
4:30 PM 0 21 131 13 0 1 195
63 33 0 11 32 33
530 2,290
5:00 PM 0 15 134 14 0 5 191
0 4 185 3 0 31 61 30 0 9 29 23
0 7 189 8 0 24
9 33 30 532 2,225
5:15 PM 0 19 166 22
5 0 21 44 31 0
3 34 41 541 2,182
5:45 PM 0 28 125 11
5 0 28 49 22 0
579 2,206
5:30 PM 0 22 123 17 0 8 189
51 21 0 10 29 33
0 6 184 4 0 19 53 25 0 5 27 29 516 2,168
Count Total 0 171 1,130 125 0 49 1,515 64 252 271 4,458 0 Peak
Hour
All 0 87 582
36 0 193 429 223 0
5 1 0 2 5 2 0 1 0 2 35 0
138 2,290 0
HV 0 3 11 1 0 2
61 0 23 762 14 0 101 232 124 0 37 129
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - 3% 2% 2% - 9% 1% 7% - 2% 2% 2% - 3% 0% 1% 2%
3 0
4:15 PM 5 3 5 1 14 1 1
0 3 3 6 6 0
West North South
4:00 PM 5 2 1 0 8 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2
1 2 3 0 0 2
1 4:30 PM 4 2 3 2 11 0 0 1
0 3 5 4 0 1
1 3
5:15 PM 1 2 0 0 3 0 1
1 2 0 3 5 0
0 1 2
5:00 PM 3 1 2 1 7 0
0 0 0 2 2 2
5:45 PM 0 2 0 0 2
1 3 1 0 0 3
1 5:30 PM 2 1 1 1 5 0 0 2
2 0 3 7 0 5
0 1 2 1 4 3 0 1 2
12 14
Peak Hour 15 8 9 3 35 1 1
Count Total 21 14 12 5 52 1 4 12 11 28 31 0
4 9 15 15 0 5 5
1 0
0 2
70 04
0 0
0 1
5 5
0 15
N
Old Country Rd
Holly St
Holly St
Old Country
Rd
Holly StOld Country Rd
TEV: 2,290
PHF: 0.96
138
129
37 304
333
0 14
762
23 799
743
0 101
232
124
213
457
0 61
582
87 730
1,001
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Old Country Rd Old Country Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
0 0 0 8 0
4:15 PM 0 2 2 1
0 0 1 0 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 5 0 0 0 2

UT LT TH RT UT LT
14 0
4:30 PM 0 1 3 0 0 1 1
0 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 1
0 0 1 0 0 0
1 0 1 11 0
4:45 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 3 0 0
0 1 0 7 34
5:15 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 1 0 0
2 35
5:00 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 23
5:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
0 1 0 5 17
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17
1 2 2 52 0
Peak Hour 0 3 11 1
Count Total 0 3 17 1 0 5 8 1 0 3 7 2 0
4:00 PM 6 0
RT
35 0
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Old Country Rd Old Country Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 2 5 1 0 2 5 2 0 1 0 2

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
15 5:00 PM
0 0 0 2
2 0
4:45 PM
0 1 0 0
0 4:30 PM
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 5
0 0
0 0 0
3 11
5:45 PM
0 2 0 0
10 5:30 PM
0 2 0 0 0 0 3
3 12
5:15 PM
0 2 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 13
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 9
0 LT TH
0 4 0 0 7 2 15
0 12 0 2 28 0
1 0
0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 1
0 LT TH
0 0 0 3 0 0 2 1
0 0 0
0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0 1 1 0 0
0 0 1 3 0 1
0 0 0
0 0 1
1 0
0 2 0
0 0 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
3 3
0 0
1 1
1 1
10 4
Date: 03/01/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB 9.1% 0.92
TOTAL 4.7% 1.00
TH RT
WB 4.5% 0.98
NB 8.1% 0.85
Peak Hour: 8:00 AM 9:00 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 2.0% 0.92

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
0 113 124 102 0 6
27 8 2 492 0
7:15 AM 0 17 133 6
7:00 AM 0 8 112 3 1 81 65 100 0 4 11 70 0
39 17 2 717 0
7:45 AM 0 11 196 11
116 0 3 22 93 0
625 0
7:30 AM 0 9 174 1 0 95 146
13 64 0 29 12 6
788 2,622
8:00 AM 0 17 214 3 0 115 149
0 107 161 119 0 4 27 78 0 46 25 3
0 118 154 103 0 6
46 16 11 803 2,933
8:15 AM 0 19 205 3
117 0 6 19 90 0
29 24 6 802 3,192
8:45 AM 0 15 193 13
86 0 2 23 80 0
799 3,107
8:30 AM 0 15 235 6 0 129 167
16 97 0 39 32 7
0 120 163 81 0 7 29 105 0 50 18 9 803 3,207
Count Total 0 111 1,462 46 1 878 1,129 305 152 46 5,829 0 Peak
Hour
All 0 66 847
824 0 38 160 677 0
27 26 0 2 8 29 0 21 4 1 151 0
33 3,207 0
HV 0 3 15 1 0 14
25 0 482 633 387 0 21 87 372 0 164 90
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - 5% 2% 4% - 3% 4% 7% - 10% 9% 8% - 13% 4% 3% 5%
0 2
7:15 AM 4 21 11 7 43 0 1
0 1 0 1 0 1
West North South
7:00 AM 5 5 4 3 17 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 6 23 9 9 47
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 7:30 AM 4 13 9 5 31 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
0 0
8:15 AM 3 15 7 7 32 0 0
1 0 1 2 0 1
0 0 0
8:00 AM 5 22 15 11 53 0
0 0 1 1 2 0
8:45 AM 6 14 6 7 33
0 0 0 1 0 0
1 8:30 AM 5 16 11 1 33 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
1 5
Peak Hour 19 67 39 26 151 0 1
Count Total 38 129 72 50 289 0 2 2 3 7 0 4
0 2 3 0 2 0 2
0 0
0 0
20 00
0 1
0 0
0 2
2 0
N
Industrial Rd
Holly St
Holly St
Industrial Rd
Holly St Industrial Rd
TEV: 3,207
PHF: 1
33 90
164
287
540
0 387
633
482
1,502
1,383
0 372
21 87
597
480
0 25
847
66 938
687
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
3 0 0 17 0
7:15 AM 0 2 2 0
4 0 1 1 2 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 4 1 0 0 1

UT LT TH RT UT LT
43 0
7:30 AM 0 0 4 0 0 5 4
0 10 3 8 0 0 1 10 0 4 3 0
0 6 10 7 0 0
5 0 0 31 0
7:45 AM 0 0 4 2
4 0 0 1 8 0
9 1 1 53 174
8:15 AM 0 1 2 0
11 0 1 4 10 0
47 138
8:00 AM 0 0 5 0 0 5 6
2 7 0 6 3 0
32 163
8:30 AM 0 2 2 1 0 6 6
0 1 7 7 0 0 1 6 0 5 2 0
0 2 8 4 0 1
1 0 0 33 165
8:45 AM 0 0 6 0
4 0 0 3 8 0
0 5 0 6 1 0 33 151
39 10 1 289 0
Peak Hour 0 3 15 1
Count Total 0 5 29 4 0 35 45 49 0 3 13 56 0
7:00 AM 1 0
RT
151 0
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 14 27 26 0 2 8 29 0 21 4 1

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
4 8:00 AM
0 1 0 2
0 0
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 7:30 AM
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0
0 0 0
0 4
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
4 8:30 AM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 5
8:15 AM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 3
0 LT TH
0 0 0 0 2 0 3
0 1 1 0 7 0
0 0
0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 1
0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 1 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 1 0
0 1 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
2 3
4 1
2 3
5 4
24 10
Date: 03/01/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB 1.2% 0.76
TOTAL 1.4% 0.96
TH RT
WB 1.6% 0.90
NB 1.2% 0.95
Peak Hour: 4:30 PM 5:30 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.4% 0.85

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
0 73 186 71 0 8
115 41 12 877 0
4:15 PM 0 10 173 11
4:00 PM 0 9 174 10 1 74 178 57 0 7 36 163 0
97 34 14 908 0
4:45 PM 0 6 159 8
59 0 9 46 202 0
878 0
4:30 PM 0 11 163 11 0 71 191
42 144 0 96 52 12
826 3,489
5:00 PM 0 8 166 6 0 78 184
0 81 144 72 0 18 47 181 0 63 33 14
1 85 199 90 0 15
101 44 22 938 3,550
5:15 PM 0 9 211 5
94 0 16 47 172 0
58 22 17 771 3,458
5:45 PM 0 9 152 8
83 0 11 33 136 0
923 3,595
5:30 PM 0 15 142 8 1 70 175
47 174 0 60 20 7
0 53 200 89 0 13 41 142 0 47 22 6 782 3,414
Count Total 0 77 1,340 67 3 585 1,457 637 268 104 6,903 0 Peak
Hour
All 0 34 699
615 0 97 339 1,314 0
6 13 0 0 4 8 0 5 1 0 51 0
57 3,595 0
HV 0 1 10 0 0 3
30 1 315 718 315 0 58 187 729 0 321 131
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - 3% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 4% - 0% 2% 1% - 2% 1% 0% 1%
0 1
4:15 PM 4 4 8 2 18 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
West North South
4:00 PM 4 6 2 3 15 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 1 9 4 2 16
0 0 0 2 1 1
2 4:30 PM 6 4 3 2 15 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 2
5:15 PM 1 2 4 1 8 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0
5:00 PM 3 7 1 1 12 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
5:45 PM 1 7 4 0 12
0 0 0 3 0 2
2 5:30 PM 3 5 2 2 12 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3
2 13
Peak Hour 11 22 12 6 51 0 1
Count Total 23 44 28 13 108 0 1 0 0 1 0 9
0 0 1 0 3 2 5
0 0
0 0
00 00
0 0
1 0
2 5
3 0
N
Industrial Rd
Holly St
Holly St
Industrial Rd
Holly St Industrial Rd
TEV: 3,595
PHF: 0.96
57 131
321
509
536
0 315
718
315
1,349
1,750
1 187
729
58 476
974
0 30
699
34 763
833
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
2 1 0 15 0
4:15 PM 0 1 3 0
1 0 0 2 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 4 0 0 2 3

UT LT TH RT UT LT
18 0
4:30 PM 0 1 5 0 0 0 2
0 2 0 2 0 0 5 3 0 1 0 1
0 2 2 5 0 0
2 0 0 15 0
4:45 PM 0 0 1 0
2 0 0 1 2 0
1 0 0 12 61
5:15 PM 0 0 1 0
6 0 0 0 1 0
16 64
5:00 PM 0 0 3 0 0 1 0
2 2 0 1 1 0
8 51
5:30 PM 0 1 2 0 0 0 3
0 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 0
0 1 2 4 0 0
2 0 0 12 48
5:45 PM 0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0 2 0
3 1 0 0 0 0 12 44
10 2 1 108 0
Peak Hour 0 1 10 0
Count Total 0 4 19 0 0 8 14 22 0 0 14 14 0
4:00 PM 0 0
RT
51 0
Interval
Start
Holly St Holly St Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 3 6 13 0 0 4 8 0 5 1 0

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
1 5:00 PM
0 0 0 1
0 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 1 0
0 1
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
1 5:30 PM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1
5:15 PM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
8 20
13 10
15 42
20 23
151
0 0 0 9 5 35 38 87
56 74
Peak Hr 4 0 26 39 69 0 0
Count Total 7 0 46 74 127 0 0 0 0 0 11 10
8:45 AM 0 0 6 14 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 14
0 0 4 1 4 11
16 8:30 AM 1 0 4 7 12 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 3 19
4 10
8:15 AM 0 0 4 8 12 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
0 8 1
8:00 AM 2 0 7 11 20 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
3 2 8
10 7:30 AM 1 0 5 12 18 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 0 8
2 7 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 1 0 11 13 25
0 0 0
HV% - 0% - 2% - 0% 6% 4%
3 4
7:15 AM 2 0 4 7 13 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
West North South
7:00 AM 0 0 5
0 174 0 0 0 0 1 90 573 0 0 0 665
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
- - - - - - 4% 3% 3%
Peak
Hour
All 0 350 0
0 1 148 992 0 0
0 0 0 5 21 0 0 0 29 10 69 0
312 2,165 0
HV 0 1 0 3 0
Count Total 0 570 0 273 0 0 0 0 1,167 504 3,655 0
0 0 0 0 0 16 130 0 0 0 177 64 491 2,144
0 184 67 552 2,165
8:45 AM 0 73 0 31
0 0 20 137 0 0
525 2,033
8:30 AM 0 100 0 44 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 25 128 0 0 0 159 77
0 169 92 576 1,839
8:15 AM 0 82 0 54
0 0 23 155 0 0
512 1,511
8:00 AM 0 90 0 47 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 22 153 0 0 0 153 76
0 155 52 420 0
7:45 AM 0 78 0 29
0 0 19 115 0 0
331 0
7:30 AM 0 48 0 31 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 17 91 0 0 0 105 44
0 65 32 248 0
7:15 AM 0 58 0 16
7:00 AM 0 41 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 6 83 0 0
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave N/A El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
SB 4.0% 0.94
TOTAL 3.2% 0.94

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
WB - -
NB 3.9% 0.93
Peak Hour: 7:45 AM 8:45 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.8% 0.91
Date: 05/03/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
0 0
0 0 0
0 35
38 5
9 N
El Camino Real
San Carlos Ave
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
San Carlos Ave
TEV: 2,165
PHF: 0.94
312665 977
923
0 573
90 840
664
1 174
350 524
402
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0

TH RT LT TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0
Westbound Northbound Southbound

LT TH RT LT TH RT LT
69 0
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave N/A El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound
0 0 0 0 0 5 21 0 0 0 29 10
0 55 19 127 0
Peak Hour 0 1 0 3
Count Total 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 8 38 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 9 5 20 64
0 5 2 12 69
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 3 0 0
12 75
8:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 6 2
0 7 4 20 76
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 6 0 0
25 63
8:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 11 2
0 9 3 18 0
7:45 AM 0 1 0 0
0 0 1 4 0 0
13 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 6 1
0 2 0 7 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 2
0 0 1 4 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave N/A El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
16 17
20 24
13 28
9 31
158
0 0 0 4 12 26 32 74
51 64
Peak Hr 9 0 25 14 48 0 0
Count Total 14 0 40 23 77 0 0 0 1 1 8 35
5:45 PM 2 0 2 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 7 12
0 0 0 3 3 3
10 5:30 PM 1 0 4 2 7 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 6 10
5 5
5:15 PM 1 0 4 1 6 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 2
3 7 11
5:00 PM 2 0 10 5 17 0
0 0 0 0 0 3
6 4 10
6 4:30 PM 3 0 6 3 12 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 10
3 9 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 3 0 4 3 10
0 0 0
HV% 0% 1% - 2% - 0% 3% 2%
5 7
4:15 PM 1 0 5 3 9 0 0
0 0 1 1 1 3
West North South
4:00 PM 1 0 5
0 178 0 0 0 0 3 132 856 0 0 0 806
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
- - - - - - 1% 1% 2%
Peak
Hour
All 1 342 0
0 11 264 1,622 0 0
0 0 0 4 21 0 0 0 9 5 48 0
399 2,717 0
HV 0 5 0 4 0
Count Total 2 640 0 352 0 0 0 0 1,596 786 5,273 0
0 0 0 0 2 44 166 0 0 0 168 100 610 2,622
0 213 105 646 2,659
5:45 PM 0 80 0 50
0 0 32 186 0 0
643 2,680
5:30 PM 1 68 0 41 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 3 36 211 0 0 0 191 101
0 204 107 723 2,717
5:15 PM 0 60 0 41
0 1 43 237 0 0
647 2,651
5:00 PM 0 80 0 51 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 24 191 0 0 0 216 100
0 198 95 667 0
4:45 PM 0 78 0 36
0 0 32 209 0 0
680 0
4:30 PM 1 90 0 42 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 33 219 0 0 0 188 97
0 218 81 657 0
4:15 PM 0 94 0 49
4:00 PM 0 90 0 42 0 0 0 0 3 20 203 0 0
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave N/A El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
SB 1.2% 0.95
TOTAL 1.8% 0.94

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
WB - -
NB 2.5% 0.88
Peak Hour: 4:15 PM 5:15 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.7% 0.91
Date: 05/03/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
0 0
0 0 0
0 26
32 12
4 N
El Camino Real
San Carlos Ave
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
San Carlos Ave
TEV: 2,717
PHF: 0.94
399806 1,205
1,198
0 132
856
987
991
3 178
342 521
532
1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0

TH RT LT TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0
Westbound Northbound Southbound

LT TH RT LT TH RT LT
48 0
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave N/A El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound
0 0 0 0 0 4 21 0 0 0 9 5
0 18 5 77 0
Peak Hour 0 5 0 4
Count Total 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 6 34 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 7 37
0 2 0 7 40
5:45 PM 0 1 0 1
0 0 0 4 0 0
6 45
5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 0
0 5 0 17 48
5:15 PM 0 0 0 1
0 0 1 9 0 0
10 40
5:00 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 2
0 2 1 12 0
4:45 PM 0 1 0 2
0 0 2 4 0 0
9 0
4:30 PM 0 1 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 2
0 3 0 9 0
4:15 PM 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 5 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

Total
10 2
9 5
10 0
8 2
46 1 0 4 0 9 1 10 20
5 26
Peak Hour 13 45 30 34 122 3 0
Count Total 21 71 48 67 207 4 1 2 0 7 2 13
8:45 AM 6 9 6 11 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
0 2 0 3 0 5
0 8:30 AM 5 12 9 9 35 1 0 1
0 0 2 0 0 0
1 4
8:15 AM 1 15 9 2 27 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 5
0 3 1
8:00 AM 1 9 6 12 28 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
4 0 5
1 7:30 AM 1 7 4 17 29 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 1
4 16 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 3 5 9 7 24
0 0 0
HV% - 2% 3% 0% - 0% 14% 4%
0 9
7:15 AM 3 6 2 5 16 1 0
1 0 0 1 1 0
West North South
7:00 AM 1 8 3
18 41 0 188 255 87 1 57 564 114 0 251 641
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
10% 10% 2% 1% - 2% 4% 2% 5%
Peak
Hour
All 0 50 380
140 2 90 955 182 0
25 2 0 8 21 1 0 5 28 1 122 0
45 2,674 0
HV 0 1 12 0 0
Count Total 0 86 681 63 0 288 437 392 1,104 78 4,498 0
0 44 74 27 0 16 136 35 0 48 157 13 669 2,674
73 173 12 694 2,568
8:45 AM 0 11 98 10
21 0 14 153 23 0
652 2,386
8:30 AM 0 14 102 7 0 49 53
0 41 56 21 0 16 140 31 0 73 163 6
57 148 14 659 2,159
8:15 AM 0 9 89 7
18 1 11 135 25 0
563 1,824
8:00 AM 0 16 91 17 0 54 72
0 42 59 20 0 9 115 24 0 33 155 8
35 120 9 512 0
7:45 AM 0 10 79 9
11 0 13 117 16 0
425 0
7:30 AM 0 11 95 3 0 27 55
0 17 33 12 0 4 98 15 0 45 104 9
28 84 7 324 0
7:15 AM 0 10 71 7
7:00 AM 0 5 56 3 0 14 35 10 1 7 61 13 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 04/25/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB 3.6% 0.91
TOTAL 4.6% 0.96
TH RT
WB 8.5% 0.91
NB 4.1% 0.97
Peak Hour: 8:00 AM 9:00 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 2.8% 0.95
1 2
0 0
00 01
0 0
0 0
1 10
9 0
N
El Camino Real
Brittan Ave
Brittan Ave
El Camino Real
Brittan Ave
El Camino Real
TEV: 2,674
PHF: 0.96
45 641
251
937
701
0 87
255
188
530
745
0 564114
57 871
736
1 41
380
50 471
357
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 2 1 0 0 0
0 3 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 1 0
0 LT TH
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 1 0 0 0 0 4
0 2 0 0 7 0
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
2 5
8:45 AM
0 1 0 0
3 8:30 AM
0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 2
8:15 AM
0 0 0
0 2 0
0 0 1
0 0 0
3 8:00 AM
0 1 0 1
0 0
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 7:30 AM
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0
0 0 0
7:00 AM 1 0
RT
122 0
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 18 25 2 0 8 21 1 0 5 28 1

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
9 54 4 207 0
Peak Hour 0 1 12 0
Count Total 0 2 18 1 0 26 39 6 0 8 37 3 0
0 5 4 0 0 1 4 1 0 2 8 1 32 122
1 8 0 35 114
8:45 AM 0 0 6 0
0 0 1 8 0 0
27 108
8:30 AM 0 1 4 0 0 2 10
0 8 6 1 0 5 4 0 0 1 1 0
1 11 0 28 97
8:15 AM 0 0 1 0
1 0 1 5 0 0
24 85
8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 3 5
0 1 2 2 0 0 8 1 0 1 6 0
1 14 2 29 0
7:45 AM 0 0 2 1
0 0 0 4 0 0
16 0
7:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 2 5
0 3 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 1
0 4 0 16 0
7:15 AM 0 0 3 0
0 0 0 3 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 2 6

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
10 7
12 8
1 4
6 3
51 4 2 10 3 9 8 5 25
12 16
Peak Hour 7 12 20 16 55 1 3
Count Total 29 15 33 36 113 2 4 4 3 13 4 19
5:45 PM 4 0 2 4 10 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
0 1 0 2 3 1
2 5:30 PM 2 1 2 3 8 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 1
0 1
5:15 PM 0 2 3 3 8 0 0
1 3 0 4 0 0
3 2 1
5:00 PM 1 3 7 3 14 0
1 2 1 1 5 2
5 5 1
5 4:30 PM 0 3 3 6 12 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
3 18 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 6 4 7 4 21
1 1 1
HV% - 1% 2% 0% - 0% 0% 3%
0 4
4:15 PM 6 2 4 10 22 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 5
West North South
4:00 PM 10 0 5
5 46 0 239 337 161 1 70 658 62 0 211 681
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
2% 1% 1% 5% - 3% 1% 3% 2%
Peak
Hour
All 0 88 321
338 2 137 1,314 112 1
5 2 0 0 17 3 0 6 8 2 55 0
69 2,944 0
HV 0 1 6 0 0
Count Total 0 155 593 101 0 448 684 396 1,350 124 5,755 0 0 54 101 42 0 15 168 12 0 39 180 13 708 2,923
44 157 14 725 2,914
5:45 PM 0 10 60 14
35 1 14 181 9 0
726 2,944
5:30 PM 0 21 71 15 0 61 102
0 55 95 41 0 18 173 11 0 62 161 14
43 189 15 764 2,917
5:15 PM 0 23 67 6
46 0 25 173 14 0
699 2,832
5:00 PM 0 21 83 9 0 62 84
0 59 77 30 0 10 156 21 0 52 145 19
54 186 21 755 0
4:45 PM 0 20 96 14
44 1 17 156 16 0
699 0
4:30 PM 0 24 75 17 0 63 81
0 51 71 45 0 17 161 14 0 59 166 15
43 166 13 679 0
4:15 PM 0 20 69 11
4:00 PM 0 16 72 15 0 43 73 55 0 21 146 15 1

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 04/25/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB 1.7% 0.92
TOTAL 1.9% 0.96
TH RT
WB 1.6% 0.96
NB 2.5% 0.93
Peak Hour: 4:30 PM 5:30 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.5% 0.88
0 1
0 0
20 13
0 0
1 2
8 5
9 3
N
El Camino Real
Brittan Ave
Brittan Ave
El Camino Real
Brittan Ave
El Camino Real
TEV: 2,944
PHF: 0.96
69 681
211
961
907
0 161
337
239
737
594
0 62
658
70 967
791
1 46
321
88 455
476
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 1 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
0 0 1
0 0 0
0 1 0 2 1 0
0 2 0 2 1 1
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 1 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0
0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
1 3 0 0 2 0 10
1 3 0 0 13 0
0 0
0 1
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6
1 10
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
10 5:30 PM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 11
5:15 PM
1 2 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
7 5:00 PM
0 1 0 5
1 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0
2 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0
RT
55 0
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 5 5 2 0 0 17 3 0 6 8 2

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
14 19 3 113 0
Peak Hour 0 1 6 0
Count Total 0 4 25 0 0 6 5 4 0 0 30 3 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 10 40
0 3 0 8 51
5:45 PM 0 1 3 0
0 0 0 2 0 0
8 55
5:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0
1 2 0 14 69
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 5 2 0
21 73
5:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 2 0
0 3 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 1 2
3 3 0 12 0
4:45 PM 0 1 5 0
1 0 0 3 0 0
22 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 5 5 0
1 2 0 18 0
4:15 PM 0 1 5 0
0 0 0 5 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 1 9 0 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Brittan Avenue -- Old County Road QC JOB #: 16182706 CITY/STATE: San Carlos, CA DATE: Thu, May 4 2023
346 532
27 302 17
400 27 30 264
75 0.93 183
197 95 51 146
196 475 54
454 725
Peak-Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AM
Peak 15-Min: 8:30 AM -- 8:45 AM

10.4 2.8

25.9 9.6 0
5 11.1 6.7 5.7

9.3 4.9

9.6 9.5 7.8 8.9
2 2.1 11.1

9.3 2.8
1 0 3
0 0 0 0
0 0
1 7
0 0
0 1 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Brittan Avenue
(Northbound)
Brittan Avenue
(Southbound)
Old County Road
(Eastbound)
Old County Road
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 10 16 3 0 0 12 0 0 3 2 4 0 1 7 0 0 58
7:05 AM 12 30 2 2 0 9 3 0 0 6 4 0 5 7 2 0 82
7:10 AM 13 22 1 1 2 18 1 0 1 5 3 0 1 7 3 0 78
7:15 AM 2 18 2 2 2 22 1 0 3 4 8 0 2 8 1 0 75
7:20 AM 12 27 2 1 1 25 0 0 2 5 3 0 4 7 0 0 89
7:25 AM 11 33 3 0 2 13 1 0 1 4 3 0 2 12 0 0 85
7:30 AM 9 32 4 0 0 20 1 0 1 7 8 0 1 10 3 0 96
7:35 AM 11 37 3 1 0 24 1 0 0 5 5 0 4 12 1 0 104
7:40 AM 12 50 3 0 4 23 0 0 1 4 12 0 2 18 0 1 130
7:45 AM 12 30 2 0 1 23 3 0 6 7 9 0 8 20 1 0 122
7:50 AM 10 19 3 1 1 40 0 0 3 1 5 0 10 20 1 0 114
7:55 AM 17 40 8 1 1 28 1 0 0 7 5 1 3 10 1 0 123 1156
8:00 AM 16 39 2 1 2 26 0 0 0 5 5 0 1 13 2 0 112 1210
8:05 AM 15 40 1 0 3 28 1 0 1 7 13 0 4 14 2 0 129 1257
8:10 AM 17 38 1 0 2 16 5 0 3 6 15 0 3 12 2 0 120 1299
8:15 AM 10 45 9 0 1 30 2 0 2 9 10 0 3 13 4 0 138 1362
8:20 AM 9 27 4 0 2 26 2 0 2 8 9 0 5 17 3 0 114 1387
8:25 AM 17 36 4 1 0 23 2 0 3 7 11 0 2 13 3 0 122 1424
8:30 AM 24 39 6 1 3 22 7 0 3 5 9 0 5 11 2 0 137 1465
8:35 AM 9 38 6 1 0 30 2 0 3 4 4 0 5 21 6 0 129 1490
8:40 AM 22 56 4 1 3 27 2 0 2 8 3 0 5 15 0 0 148 1508
8:45 AM 17 48 5 1 0 20 1 0 3 7 6 0 8 18 2 0 136 1522
8:50 AM 12 30 7 0 0 14 1 0 2 7 3 0 7 27 2 0 112 1520
8:55 AM 22 39 5 0 1 40 2 0 3 2 7 0 3 9 2 0 135 1532
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 220 532 64 12 24 316 44 0 32 68 64 0 60 188 32 0 1656 Heavy Trucks 0 8 4 0 16 12 4 4 8 4 8 0 68
Buses
Pedestrians 0 4 0 4 8
Bicycles 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 16
Scooters
Comments: 24 hour video available under AM sitecode
Report generated on 5/11/2023 4:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 1 of 1 ends

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Brittan Avenue -- Old County Road QC JOB #: 16182716 CITY/STATE: San Carlos, CA DATE: Thu, May 4 2023
578 399
26 540 12
365 26 20 281
102 0.95 202
267 139 59 168
143 353 53
743 549
Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:05 PM -- 5:20 PM
1 4
0 1.1 0

4.1 0 0 2.1
1 2.5

1.1 1.4 1.7 1.8
7 4.5 3.8

1.2 5.1
4 4 7
1 0 0 0
0 0
3 6
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Brittan Avenue
(Northbound)
Brittan Avenue
(Southbound)
Old County Road
(Eastbound)
Old County Road
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 11 29 5 1 1 38 4 0 4 6 8 0 10 14 2 0 133
4:05 PM 15 41 2 0 1 31 7 0 5 8 10 0 7 20 1 0 148
4:10 PM 12 31 8 0 1 33 3 0 6 10 10 0 9 20 1 0 144
4:15 PM 8 30 5 1 0 59 6 0 1 6 7 0 4 11 2 0 140
4:20 PM 17 30 10 1 3 29 4 0 4 7 4 0 6 11 0 0 126
4:25 PM 10 22 5 2 1 32 3 0 0 5 8 0 5 13 3 0 109
4:30 PM 17 28 3 1 1 47 1 0 2 7 11 0 6 13 1 0 138
4:35 PM 16 50 7 0 1 38 2 0 3 4 9 0 7 13 1 0 151
4:40 PM 12 26 4 0 0 40 1 0 3 8 21 0 6 27 2 1 151
4:45 PM 11 21 5 1 4 48 2 0 3 7 14 0 3 14 3 0 136
4:50 PM 18 33 7 2 1 46 2 0 0 7 7 0 5 18 0 0 146
4:55 PM 12 28 6 0 1 39 4 0 2 6 12 0 1 17 0 0 128 1650
5:00 PM 4 20 1 1 2 54 2 0 3 10 6 0 4 20 3 0 130 1647
5:05 PM 6 30 6 1 1 54 2 0 1 16 17 0 9 14 1 0 158 1657
5:10 PM 16 30 6 0 1 40 0 0 5 9 12 0 4 14 3 0 140 1653
5:15 PM 8 26 4 0 0 38 2 0 1 17 14 0 7 23 4 0 144 1657
5:20 PM 8 30 1 0 0 59 5 0 3 5 6 0 3 12 2 0 134 1665
5:25 PM 9 31 3 0 0 37 3 0 0 6 10 0 3 17 0 0 119 1675
5:30 PM 14 23 3 0 0 44 0 0 1 3 9 0 5 19 2 0 123 1660
5:35 PM 9 25 3 0 0 56 3 0 1 7 7 1 6 15 1 0 134 1643
5:40 PM 14 42 5 0 0 45 3 0 2 6 11 0 6 15 0 0 149 1641
5:45 PM 10 30 2 0 0 38 1 0 1 3 8 0 4 19 1 0 117 1622
5:50 PM 12 19 1 2 0 54 1 0 1 7 6 0 7 10 0 0 120 1596
5:55 PM 14 23 2 0 0 40 1 0 1 5 9 0 3 8 5 0 111 1579
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 120 344 64 4 8 528 16 0 28 168 172 0 80 204 32 0 1768 Heavy Trucks 12 24 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 64
Buses
Pedestrians 4 4 0 4 12
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 16
Scooters
Comments: 24 hour video available under AM sitecode
Report generated on 5/11/2023 4:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 1 of 1 ends

www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
1 1
1 1
1 4
0 1
10 6
Date: 09/19/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB 13.8% 0.84
TOTAL 5.7% 0.93
TH RT
WB 4.2% 0.83
NB 7.1% 0.97
Peak Hour: 8:00 AM 9:00 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 2.7% 0.83

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
0 43 35 7 0 9
11 19 4 253 0
7:15 AM 0 25 56 5
7:00 AM 0 22 62 0 0 34 38 4 0 8 43 8 0
9 23 13 353 0
7:45 AM 0 33 84 0
7 0 12 50 12 0
304 0
7:30 AM 0 35 86 4 0 45 57
67 16 0 12 22 7
397 1,307
8:00 AM 0 34 106 5 0 64 102
0 46 89 12 0 9 57 16 0 15 26 10
0 52 59 19 0 21
9 24 18 480 1,534
8:15 AM 0 33 87 6
11 0 16 67 24 0
13 36 15 499 1,807
8:45 AM 0 40 91 8
12 0 16 74 22 0
431 1,661
8:30 AM 0 45 118 13 0 68 67
72 14 0 14 36 18
0 73 112 11 0 20 75 15 0 10 52 15 522 1,932
Count Total 0 267 690 41 0 425 559 93 238 100 3,239 0
Peak
Hour
All 0 152 402
83 0 111 505 127 0
18 3 0 5 22 4 0 12 19 5 110 0
66 1,932 0
HV 0 7 8 1 0 6
32 0 257 340 53 0 73 288 75 0 46 148
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - 5% 2% 3% - 2% 5% 6% - 7% 8% 5% - 26% 13% 8% 6%
0 0
7:15 AM 5 6 3 11 25 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 1
West North South
7:00 AM 5 4 5 4 18 1
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 4 8 2 8 22
1 1 0 1 0 0
0 7:30 AM 4 7 7 6 24 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0
8:15 AM 7 5 7 6 25 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0
8:00 AM 3 6 5 7 21 0
0 0 2 0 2 1
8:45 AM 3 8 7 10 28
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 8:30 AM 3 8 12 13 36 0 0 0
5 1 6 0 3 0
0 0 3 1 4 0 1 0 0
0 1
Peak Hour 16 27 31 36 110 0 0
Count Total 34 52 48 65 199 1 0 10 3 14 1 8
8 2 10 0 5 0 1
0 0
0 0
20 17
0 0
0 0
0 1
5 0
N
Industrial Rd
Brittan Ave
Brittan Ave
Industrial Rd
Brittan Ave
Industrial Rd
TEV: 1,932
PHF: 0.93
66 148
46 260
493
0 53
340
257
650
523
0 75
288
73 437
436
0 32
402
152
586
479
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
0 3 1 18 0
7:15 AM 0 4 0 1
1 0 0 5 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 3 2 0 0 0 3

UT LT TH RT UT LT
25 0
7:30 AM 0 3 1 0 0 5 2
0 5 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 5 1
0 2 5 1 0 0
3 2 1 24 0
7:45 AM 0 1 3 0
0 0 2 4 1 0
2 2 3 21 92
8:15 AM 0 2 4 1
0 0 2 2 1 0
22 89
8:00 AM 0 1 2 0 0 1 5
2 0 0 5 3 0
25 92
8:30 AM 0 3 0 0 0 1 5
0 1 3 1 0 2 5 0 0 2 4 0
0 3 5 0 0 0
6 6 1 36 104
8:45 AM 0 1 2 0
2 0 1 8 3 0
7 0 0 2 7 1 28 110
25 32 8 199 0
Peak Hour 0 7 8 1
Count Total 0 18 14 2 0 18 29 5 0 7 36 5 0
7:00 AM 1 0
RT
110 0
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 6 18 3 0 5 22 4 0 12 19 5

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
4 8:00 AM
0 2 0 2
1 0
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 7:30 AM
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 8
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
9 8:30 AM
1 4 0 0 1 0 6
0 3
8:15 AM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 10
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 3
0 LT TH
1 7 0 0 2 0 10
1 9 0 0 14 0
0 0
0 1
1 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
2 1
1 2
6 5
4 0
21 14
Date: 09/19/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB 1.2% 0.83
TOTAL 1.4% 0.96
TH RT
WB 1.7% 0.95
NB 1.3% 0.93
Peak Hour: 4:30 PM 5:30 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.6% 0.92

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
0 44 63 7 0 49
34 56 24 524 0
4:15 PM 0 38 65 8
4:00 PM 0 38 88 10 0 34 50 10 0 39 113 28 0
42 43 29 573 0
4:45 PM 0 33 72 7
6 0 57 140 20 0
506 0
4:30 PM 0 37 76 9 0 46 68
103 20 0 39 48 22
596 2,199
5:00 PM 0 39 49 13 0 42 80
0 44 65 5 0 60 162 28 0 31 46 43
0 34 80 5 0 58
53 49 47 624 2,299
5:15 PM 0 24 78 12
4 0 64 159 25 0
41 45 31 557 2,383
5:45 PM 0 32 55 5
7 0 53 147 28 0
606 2,399
5:30 PM 0 42 63 7 0 39 54
172 32 0 29 43 39
0 46 59 4 0 63 144 28 0 22 52 50 560 2,347
Count Total 0 283 546 71 0 329 519 291 382 285 4,546 0
Peak
Hour
All 0 133 275
48 0 443 1,140 209 0
2 0 0 3 8 2 0 1 2 3 34 0
158 2,399 0
HV 0 1 6 0 0 6
41 0 166 293 20 0 239 633 105 0 155 181
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - 1% 2% 0% - 4% 1% 0% - 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% 1%
1 0
4:15 PM 6 5 4 2 17 0 0
0 2 1 3 0 1
West North South
4:00 PM 3 2 6 3 14 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 1 2 5 1 9
3 4 0 0 1 0
0 4:30 PM 4 0 6 2 12 0 0 1
1 1 2 0 1 0
0 1
5:15 PM 0 3 1 0 4 0 0
0 2 2 4 0 5
0 1 0
5:00 PM 2 3 1 3 9 0
0 0 0 1 1 1
5:45 PM 1 1 1 0 3
2 2 1 2 1 0
1 5:30 PM 1 0 3 1 5 0 0 0
1 3 4 0 4 0
0 0 1 3 4 0 0 0 0
4 2
Peak Hour 7 8 13 6 34 0 0
Count Total 18 16 27 12 73 0 0 8 16 24 2 13
4 9 13 1 9 2 2
0 0
0 0
90 04
0 0
0 0
2 2
9 1
N
Industrial Rd
Brittan Ave
Brittan Ave
Industrial Rd
Brittan Ave
Industrial Rd
TEV: 2,399
PHF: 0.96
158
181
155
494
786
0 20
293
166
479
535
0 239
633
105
388
977
0 41
275
133
449
690
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
1 2 0 14 0
4:15 PM 0 2 4 0
1 0 1 5 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 3 0 0 1 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
17 0
4:30 PM 0 1 3 0 0 0 0
0 2 0 3 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
0 1 1 12 0
4:45 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 3 3 0 0
0 1 2 9 47
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
9 52
5:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 2 1
4 1 0 1 0 0
4 34
5:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 1 0 5 27
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 2 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 3 21
3 6 3 73 0
Peak Hour 0 1 6 0
Count Total 0 3 15 0 0 9 3 4 0 7 17 3 0
4:00 PM 3 0
RT
34 0
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Industrial Rd Industrial Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 6 2 0 0 3 8 2 0 1 2 3

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
10 5:00 PM
0 0 0 1
4 0
4:45 PM
0 1 0 0
0 4:30 PM
4:15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
0 0
0 0 0
2 11
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
13 5:30 PM
0 1 0 0 3 0 4
4 11
5:15 PM
0 2 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 14
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 16
0 LT TH
0 4 0 0 9 0 13
0 8 0 0 24 0
2 0
0 3
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
3 0
0 1 0
0 2 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
2 1
0 2
0 0
1 4
10 3 0 5 0 0 1 4 5
1 7
Peak Hour 3 17 30 33 83 1 1
Count Total 6 26 57 63 152 4 1 6 1 12 0 2
8:45 AM 1 1 10 10 22 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 3
0 1 0 0 0 1
0 8:30 AM 0 9 3 8 20 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 0 0
0 0
8:15 AM 1 5 9 6 21 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1
8:00 AM 1 2 8 9 20 0
2 0 3 0 5 0
0 0 0
1 7:30 AM 2 3 6 8 19 1 0 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
4 10 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 0 5 9 12 26
0 1 0
HV% - 4% 0% 0% - 0% 3% 4%
0 1
7:15 AM 0 1 7 6 14 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
West North South
7:00 AM 1 0 5
6 36 0 160 67 75 1 34 569 263 0 69 771
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
4% 7% 8% 2% - 1% 4% 3% 4%
Peak
Hour
All 0 51 228
132 1 47 1,035 478 1
5 6 0 1 24 5 0 1 31 1 83 0
29 2,353 0
HV 0 2 1 0 0
Count Total 0 87 332 50 0 278 113 115 1,263 46 3,978 0
0 39 12 19 1 5 122 71 0 16 212 5 572 2,353
18 193 6 602 2,342
8:45 AM 0 8 51 11
20 0 7 155 63 0
615 2,205
8:30 AM 0 10 71 11 0 34 14
0 39 19 18 0 5 153 69 0 24 194 8
11 172 10 564 1,940
8:15 AM 0 17 60 9
18 0 17 139 60 0
561 1,625
8:00 AM 0 16 46 5 0 48 22
0 38 19 30 0 4 146 72 1 17 175 5
13 139 4 465 0
7:45 AM 0 15 32 7
14 0 7 127 55 0
350 0
7:30 AM 0 11 37 4 0 42 12
0 26 12 7 0 0 117 46 0 9 98 4
7 80 4 249 0
7:15 AM 0 4 25 2
7:00 AM 0 6 10 1 0 12 3 6 0 2 76 42 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Howard Ave Howard Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 10/04/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB 3.8% 0.93
TOTAL 3.5% 0.96
TH RT
WB 5.6% 0.86
NB 3.5% 0.95
Peak Hour: 8:00 AM 9:00 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.0% 0.86
0 1
0 0
00 02
1 0
1 0
1 4
0 0
N
El Camino Real
Howard Ave
Howard Ave
El Camino Real
Howard Ave El Camino Real
TEV: 2,353
PHF: 0.96
29 771
69 869
695
0 75
67 160
302
560
0 569263
34 968
867
1 36
228
51 315
130
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 4 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
1 LT TH
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 2 1 0 0 0 5
0 2 4 0 12 0
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 1
0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 5
1 7
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
7 8:30 AM
0 0 1 0 0 0 1
0 7
8:15 AM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
7 8:00 AM
0 0 3 5
1 0
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 7:30 AM
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
0 0
0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0
RT
83 0
Interval
Start
Howard Ave Howard Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 6 5 6 0 1 24 5 0 1 31 1

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
1 59 3 152 0
Peak Hour 0 2 1 0
Count Total 0 3 3 0 0 10 9 7 0 2 47 8 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 8 2 0 1 9 0 22 83
0 8 0 20 87
8:45 AM 0 0 1 0
2 0 0 3 0 0
21 86
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 3
0 0 1 4 0 0 8 1 0 0 5 1
0 9 0 20 79
8:15 AM 0 1 0 0
0 0 1 5 2 0
26 69
8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
0 3 1 1 0 0 7 2 0 0 11 1
0 8 0 19 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 5 1 0
14 0
7:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 1 2
0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 5 1
0 4 0 10 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 4 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Howard Ave Howard Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
8 1
4 2
10 5
5 3
38 1 1 6 1 6 8 7 22
13 11
Peak Hour 2 4 17 16 39 2 2
Count Total 9 10 38 32 89 3 5 1 2 11 1 13
5:45 PM 2 0 6 4 12 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 3 0
0 1 1 0 4 0
2 5:30 PM 0 0 2 4 6 1 0 0
1 0 1 0 1 2
2 3
5:15 PM 0 1 5 5 11 0 0
1 0 0 2 0 5
0 0 2
5:00 PM 2 1 4 3 10 1
0 1 0 1 2 0
3 1 0
1 4:30 PM 1 1 7 6 15 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 12 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 0 2 6 4 12
1 1 0
HV% - 0% 1% 0% - - 0% 2%
1 3
4:15 PM 2 2 5 2 11 0 0
1 0 0 1 0 4
West North South
4:00 PM 2 3 3
0 47 0 282 171 124 0 34 710 205 1 63 909
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 2% 4% 1%
Peak
Hour
All 0 55 162
256 0 61 1,456 407 1
0 4 0 0 16 1 0 0 14 2 39 0
47 2,810 0
HV 0 0 2 0 0
Count Total 0 107 287 79 0 547 354 118 1,776 75 5,524 0 0 69 56 33 0 12 174 49 0 14 217 5 681 2,767
13 227 11 679 2,810
5:45 PM 0 12 36 4
31 0 6 159 56 0
711 2,808
5:30 PM 0 14 28 15 0 70 49
0 71 34 35 0 7 196 43 1 12 231 12
18 239 12 696 2,762
5:15 PM 0 12 50 7
29 0 10 157 50 0
724 2,757
5:00 PM 0 19 33 15 0 73 41
0 68 47 29 0 11 198 56 0 20 212 12
14 218 7 677 0
4:45 PM 0 10 51 10
41 0 5 189 47 0
665 0
4:30 PM 0 16 30 4 0 58 48
0 70 45 25 0 7 187 45 0 14 200 12
13 232 4 691 0
4:15 PM 0 15 30 15
4:00 PM 0 9 29 9 0 68 34 33 0 3 196 61 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Howard Ave Howard Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 10/04/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB 1.6% 0.95
TOTAL 1.4% 0.97
TH RT
WB 0.7% 0.96
NB 1.8% 0.90
Peak Hour: 4:45 PM 5:45 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.8% 0.93
0 2
0 0
10 01
0 0
2 0
8 7
6 1
N
El Camino Real
Howard Ave
Howard Ave
El Camino Real
Howard Ave El Camino Real
TEV: 2,810
PHF: 0.97
47 909
63 1,020
890
1 124
171
282
577
430
0 710205
34 1,238
949
0 47
162
55 264
252
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 1 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 1 0
0 2 0 0 2 0
0 3 0 1 4 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1
0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 1 0 0 1 0 6
0 1 0 0 11 0
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 2
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 7
1 6
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
6 5:30 PM
0 1 0 0 0 0 1
2 5
5:15 PM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
4 5:00 PM
0 0 0 2
1 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 1 0
4:00 PM 1 0
RT
39 0
Interval
Start
Howard Ave Howard Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 0 0 4 0 0 16 1 0 0 14 2

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
1 29 2 89 0
Peak Hour 0 0 2 0
Count Total 0 0 8 1 0 3 0 7 0 0 33 5 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 12 39
0 4 0 6 39
5:45 PM 0 0 2 0
0 0 0 2 0 0
11 48
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 1
0 2 1 10 48
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 0 0
12 50
5:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 0 0 5 1 0 0 4 0
1 5 0 15 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 6 1 0
11 0
4:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 0
0 4 0 12 0
4:15 PM 0 0 1 1
2 0 0 2 1 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 1 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Howard Ave Howard Ave El Camino Real El Camino Real
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Howard Avenue -- Old County Road QC JOB #: 16182708 CITY/STATE: San Carlos, CA DATE: Thu, May 4 2023
170 303
11 150 9
285 22 27 170
56 0.95 72
142 64 71 171
232 254 106
315 592
Peak-Hour: 7:50 AM -- 8:50 AM
Peak 15-Min: 8:10 AM -- 8:25 AM

7.6 4

9.1 8 0

2.1 9.1 14.8 8.2

1.8 2.8

2.1 0 11.3 1.2

1.3 2.4 0.9

6.3 1.7
3 1 2
0 0 0 0
0 0
2 6
0 0
3 1 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Howard Avenue
(Northbound)
Howard Avenue
(Southbound)
Old County Road
(Eastbound)
Old County Road
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 5 12 5 0 0 2 0 0 2 5 2 0 4 6 3 0 46
7:05 AM 6 4 4 2 1 7 0 0 1 3 2 0 5 3 1 0 39
7:10 AM 9 13 7 1 0 8 1 0 0 1 8 0 2 4 0 0 54
7:15 AM 9 11 2 3 2 6 2 0 0 6 4 0 4 3 2 0 54
7:20 AM 12 9 6 1 1 13 4 0 0 5 5 0 3 8 2 0 69
7:25 AM 7 19 6 1 0 5 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 6 1 0 52
7:30 AM 16 17 5 0 0 5 0 0 3 3 7 0 4 2 1 0 63
7:35 AM 12 12 3 3 1 11 2 0 0 3 3 0 7 4 2 0 63
7:40 AM 18 15 7 4 1 6 1 0 0 6 6 0 4 5 2 0 75
7:45 AM 15 15 9 2 0 11 0 0 2 4 6 0 5 9 0 0 78
7:50 AM 20 10 11 1 1 8 0 0 2 2 7 0 9 10 1 0 82
7:55 AM 14 23 10 5 0 7 1 0 1 6 6 0 14 6 2 0 95 770
8:00 AM 12 14 16 2 1 20 0 0 3 3 6 0 6 4 3 0 90 814
8:05 AM 18 15 2 2 3 18 0 0 1 4 3 0 4 6 1 0 77 852
8:10 AM 17 26 8 3 1 19 1 0 3 4 2 0 5 7 2 0 98 896
8:15 AM 12 25 8 1 0 9 0 0 3 3 9 0 9 2 7 0 88 930
8:20 AM 16 29 9 1 0 14 0 0 2 7 8 0 3 5 3 0 97 958
8:25 AM 14 19 9 4 0 14 1 0 1 7 4 0 5 5 3 0 86 992
8:30 AM 14 22 8 2 2 10 4 0 4 3 7 0 6 5 1 0 88 1017
8:35 AM 25 25 11 4 0 5 3 0 1 6 1 0 0 4 1 0 86 1040
8:40 AM 17 27 10 2 0 14 1 0 0 8 6 0 5 10 3 0 103 1068
8:45 AM 23 19 4 3 1 12 0 0 1 3 5 0 5 8 0 0 84 1074
8:50 AM 26 14 4 0 0 12 1 0 4 5 6 0 2 4 0 0 78 1070
8:55 AM 9 12 3 1 4 17 0 0 1 8 4 0 2 10 3 0 74 1049
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 180 320 100 20 4 168 4 0 32 56 76 0 68 56 48 0 1132 Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 0 16 4 4 0 0 12 0 8 48
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 4 0 4
Bicycles 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Scooters
Comments: 24 hour video available under AM sitecode
Report generated on 5/11/2023 4:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 1 of 1 ends

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Howard Avenue -- Old County Road QC JOB #: 16182718 CITY/STATE: San Carlos, CA DATE: Thu, May 4 2023
378 240
13 354 11
268 19 16 219
88 0.88 99
210 103 104 154
198 205 55
603 458
Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:05 PM -- 5:20 PM

1.1 1.7
0 1.1 0
3 0 6.3 5

2.3 2

2.4 2.9 7.7 4.5
3 1.5 9.1

2.5 3.1
2 2 6
1 0 0 0
0 1
5 6
0 1
0 1 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Howard Avenue
(Northbound)
Howard Avenue
(Southbound)
Old County Road
(Eastbound)
Old County Road
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 14 24 8 2 2 33 0 0 1 6 8 0 12 15 2 0 127
4:05 PM 11 10 6 5 1 34 0 0 1 5 6 0 7 7 0 0 93
4:10 PM 9 24 2 4 2 28 2 0 3 8 7 0 3 9 2 0 103
4:15 PM 12 14 2 2 2 18 0 0 0 7 6 0 8 5 3 0 79
4:20 PM 12 15 6 9 1 25 0 0 4 7 8 0 10 4 1 0 102
4:25 PM 10 10 5 3 2 20 2 0 1 2 5 0 7 2 1 0 70
4:30 PM 17 16 3 3 2 23 1 0 1 4 7 0 6 3 4 0 90
4:35 PM 13 18 2 4 1 24 2 0 0 11 10 0 11 17 2 0 115
4:40 PM 12 16 6 5 1 26 2 0 0 7 7 0 5 5 1 0 93
4:45 PM 17 17 5 4 1 35 1 0 1 5 8 0 10 4 0 0 108
4:50 PM 5 14 2 2 0 27 2 0 6 4 14 0 9 12 3 0 100
4:55 PM 11 23 6 4 0 19 1 0 3 5 9 0 7 6 1 0 95 1175
5:00 PM 20 14 1 2 3 29 0 0 2 8 15 0 9 12 0 0 115 1163
5:05 PM 13 25 7 3 0 45 2 0 1 13 10 0 14 10 3 0 146 1216 5:10 PM 11 16 6 6 0 28 1 0 1 5 7 0 8 7 0 0 96 1209
5:15 PM 14 19 5 3 2 30 0 0 1 14 6 0 13 8 1 0 116 1246
5:20 PM 8 13 3 3 1 50 1 0 0 7 6 0 6 7 0 0 105 1249
5:25 PM 15 14 9 3 0 18 0 0 3 5 4 0 6 8 1 0 86 1265
5:30 PM 11 13 2 1 0 19 3 0 0 1 5 0 6 3 0 1 65 1240
5:35 PM 16 13 8 3 1 34 1 0 1 5 8 0 8 6 1 1 106 1231
5:40 PM 9 20 5 4 1 27 1 0 2 1 6 0 9 14 2 0 101 1239
5:45 PM 13 15 4 4 0 24 1 0 0 3 3 0 8 5 0 0 80 1211
5:50 PM 8 11 4 8 0 34 1 0 0 5 5 0 8 4 3 0 91 1202
5:55 PM 8 11 2 5 0 32 3 0 0 7 6 0 7 7 2 0 90 1197
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 152 240 72 48 8 412 12 0 12 128 92 0 140 100 16 0 1432 Heavy Trucks 12 8 8 0 4 0 0 0 4 16 0 0 52
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 8 8
Bicycles 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 8 0 24
Scooters
Comments: 24 hour video available under AM sitecode
Report generated on 5/11/2023 4:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 1 of 1 ends

www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
2 2
18 41
227
280
42 12
624
566
Date: 09/19/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB 1.4% 0.84
TOTAL 1.3% 0.88
TH RT
WB 0.4% 0.85
NB 1.9% 0.92
Peak Hour: 7:30 AM 8:30 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.8% 0.74

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Club Drive Dartmouth Ave San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
0 4 4 9 0 3
5 22 6 89 0
7:15 AM 0 12 1 2
7:00 AM 0 14 0 3 0 0 1 4 0 4 29 1 0
13 57 13 302 0
7:45 AM 0 35 19 6
26 0 4 67 36 0
139 0
7:30 AM 0 20 19 6 0 28 13
35 9 0 18 34 8
359 889
8:00 AM 0 50 21 19 0 26 4
0 33 11 22 0 2 92 33 0 33 52 21
0 27 21 35 0 11
16 88 21 407 1,207
8:15 AM 0 42 17 12
37 0 11 100 14 0
12 67 22 272 1,404
8:45 AM 0 22 4 3
24 0 11 48 12 0
366 1,434
8:30 AM 0 16 21 3 0 18 18
76 20 0 11 74 20
0 4 3 4 0 3 62 4 0 7 73 14 203 1,248
Count Total 0 211 102 54 0 140 75 115 467 125 2,137 0
Peak
Hour
All 0 147 76
161 0 49 509 129 0
0 1 0 0 7 2 0 0 5 1 18 0
75 1,434 0
HV 0 0 2 0 0 0
43 0 114 49 120 0 28 335 103 0 73 271
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - 0% 3% 0% - 0% 0% 1% - 0% 2% 2% - 0% 2% 1% 1%
0 0
7:15 AM 0 1 0 2 3 1 0
1 2 1 4 1 1
West North South
7:00 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 0 1 4 2 7
1 5 5 3 10 0
0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 3
1 1 3 0 2 0
118 0
8:15 AM 1 0 3 1 5 0 1
0 3 2 5 90 19
2 14 0
8:00 AM 1 0 2 0 3 0
0 0 1 1 2 25
8:45 AM 0 0 1 1 2
0 1 6 4 32 0
0 8:30 AM 0 1 2 2 5 0 0 1
2 2 5 61 34 185
0 0 1 1 2 1 2 9 0
368 0
Peak Hour 2 1 9 6 18 1 1
Count Total 2 3 12 13 30 2 2 14 9 27 189 67
9 6 17 181 58 327 0
0 1
0 0
42 07
2 1
0 0
327
0 58
181
N
San Carlos Ave
Dartmouth Ave
Dartmouth Ave
San Carlos
Ave
Club DriveSan Carlos
Ave
TEV: 1,434
PHF: 0.88
75 271
73 419
602
0 120
49 114
283
252
0 335
103
28 428
466
0 43
76 147
266
152
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Club Drive Dartmouth Ave San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
0 1 1 2 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
3 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 3 0 3 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 16
8:15 AM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 2 0 0
7 15
8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
3 1 0 0 2 0
5 18
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 5 20
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 0 0
1 0 0 1 0 0 2 15
1 8 4 30 0
Peak Hour 0 0 2 0
Count Total 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 10 2 0
7:00 AM 4 0
RT
18 0
Interval
Start
Club Drive Dartmouth Ave San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 0 0 1 0 0 7 2 0 0 5 1

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
14 8:00 AM
0 1 0 2
5 0
7:45 AM
0 2 1 0
0 7:30 AM
7:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3
0 0
0 0 0
1 13
8:45 AM
0 0 1 0
17 8:30 AM
0 2 0 1 1 0 5
5 15
8:15 AM
0 2 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 13
Peak Hour
Count Total 2 7
0 LT TH
0 7 2 2 4 0 17
0 10 4 0 27 0
0 0
0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 1 0
1 LT TH
0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 1
0 2 0 0 0 2
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0
0 1 0
1 1 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
21 6
3 13
6 4
5 2
60 28
Date: 09/19/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB 0.5% 0.89
TOTAL 0.3% 0.93
TH RT
WB 0.0% 0.91
NB 0.3% 0.93
Peak Hour: 4:45 PM 5:45 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.0% 0.84

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Club Drive Dartmouth Ave San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
0 19 9 10 0 5
9 90 21 312 0
4:15 PM 0 22 10 2
4:00 PM 0 15 10 9 0 16 6 19 0 7 92 18 0
17 93 18 337 0
4:45 PM 0 24 4 3
20 0 2 119 9 0
294 0
4:30 PM 0 25 10 8 0 11 5
95 8 0 11 83 20
352 1,295
5:00 PM 0 18 4 3 0 15 7
0 18 6 11 0 8 135 9 0 14 104 16
0 8 10 15 0 2
11 125 32 388 1,371
5:15 PM 0 26 6 5
12 0 9 137 15 0
10 117 31 361 1,449
5:45 PM 0 25 1 3
13 0 3 137 6 0
348 1,425
5:30 PM 0 22 3 6 0 6 7
121 14 0 12 95 34
0 3 4 15 0 5 138 4 0 11 103 37 349 1,446
Count Total 0 177 48 39 0 96 54 95 810 209 2,741 0
Peak
Hour
All 0 90 17
115 0 41 974 83 0
0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 5 0
113 1,449 0
HV 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 0 47 30 51 0 22 530 44 0 47 441
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% - 0% 1% 0% 0%
17 0
4:15 PM 0 0 2 2 4 0 0
0 0 3 3 0 4
West North South
4:00 PM 0 0 0 2 2 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 0 0 1 0 1
1 6 1 1 1 0
0 4:30 PM 0 2 1 2 5 0 1 4
0 1 1 2 1 3
4 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
0 2 1 3 0 2
1 7 0
5:00 PM 0 0 1 1 2 0
0 0 1 1 2 5
5:45 PM 0 0 1 2 3
0 4 1 1 3 0
0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 3
1 3 6 0 2 2
0 1 2 6 9 0 2 0 0
37 0
Peak Hour 0 0 2 3 5 2 1
Count Total 0 2 6 11 19 2 3 13 16 34 9 14
7 5 15 6 6 16 0
0 1
1 0
50 07
0 1
0 0
16 0
6 6
N
San Carlos Ave
Dartmouth Ave
Dartmouth Ave
San Carlos
Ave
Club DriveSan Carlos
Ave
TEV: 1,449
PHF: 0.93
113
441
47 601
671
0 51
30 47
128
108
0 44
530
22 505
596
0 17
17 90
124
165
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Club Drive Dartmouth Ave San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
0 2 0 2 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
4 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 5 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 0 0
0 1 0 2 12
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
1 12
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
0 8
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 2 0 2 5
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 2 0 3 7
0 10 1 19 0
Peak Hour 0 0 0 0
Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 6 0 0
4:00 PM 3 0
RT
5 0
Interval
Start
Club Drive Dartmouth Ave San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
12 5:00 PM
0 1 0 2
6 0
4:45 PM
0 4 0 0
0 4:30 PM
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
0 0
0 0 0
4 15
5:45 PM
0 3 0 0
17 5:30 PM
0 1 0 0 3 0 6
3 12
5:15 PM
0 2 0
1 1 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 22
Peak Hour
Count Total 1 15
0 LT TH
0 7 0 0 5 0 15
0 13 0 0 34 0
0 0
1 5
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 1 1 0 0 0 1
1 1 0 1 0 2
0 0 1
0 0 1
1 0
0 1 0
0 1 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
3 5
2 7
4 8
6 3
38 25
WB 1.6% 0.80
NB 1.3% 0.88
Peak Hour: 7:45 AM 8:45 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.1% 0.95
Date: 10/10/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave Alameda de las Pulgas n/a 15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
SB - -
TOTAL 1.3% 0.94
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 40 15 0 19 26

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
0 20 43 0 0 24
0 0 0 137 0
7:15 AM 0 0 56 28
0 0 14 0 23 0
0 0 0 321 0
7:45 AM 0 0 103 53
0 0 56 0 47 0
209 0
7:30 AM 0 0 70 28 0 41 79
0 38 0 0 0 0
506 1,173
8:00 AM 0 0 136 60 0 38 136
0 45 150 0 0 83 0 72 0 0 0 0
0 49 103 0 0 39
0 0 0 496 1,532
8:15 AM 0 0 145 49
0 0 52 0 74 0
0 0 0 419 1,906
8:45 AM 0 0 99 42
0 0 36 0 87 0
485 1,808
8:30 AM 0 0 147 48 0 42 59
0 100 0 0 0 0
0 44 63 0 0 38 0 72 0 0 0 0 358 1,758
Count Total 0 0 796 323 0 298 659 0 0 0 2,931 0
Peak
Hour
All 0 0 531
0 0 342 0 513 0
9 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 25 0
0 1,906 0
HV 0 0 4 4 0 1
210 0 174 448 0 0 210 0 333 0 0 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - - 1% 2% - 1% 2% - - 2% - 1% - - - - 1%
2 1
7:15 AM 3 1 3 0 7 2 3
1 0 0 1 0 0
West North South
7:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 2 4 2 0 8
0 0 0 0 2 0
3 7:30 AM 2 3 2 0 7 0 0 0
0 0 5 0 0 2
3 1
8:15 AM 2 2 3 0 7 2 2
2 3 0 6 0 0
0 3 4
8:00 AM 2 2 1 0 5 1
0 0 1 0 1 0
8:45 AM 4 2 3 0 9
0 4 1 0 4 1
3 8:30 AM 2 2 1 0 5 0 2 2
1 0 5 1 0 4
2 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 0
22 13
Peak Hr 8 10 7 0 25 3 6
Count Total 18 16 15 0 49 7 10 7 0 24 3 0
7 0 16 2 0 14 9
0 3
5 2
6 0
14 9
0 2
N
Alameda de las Pulgas
San Carlos Ave
San Carlos Ave
Alameda de las
Pulgas
San Carlos Ave
TEV: 1,906
PHF: 0.94
448
174 622
864
0 210
333
384
543
0 210
531 741
658
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave Alameda de las Pulgas n/a 15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
0 0 0 1 0
7:15 AM 0 0 2 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
7 0
7:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 2 1
0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 4 0 0 2
0 0 0 7 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 2
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 0 5 27
8:15 AM 0 0 1 1
0 0 1 0 0 0
8 23
8:00 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 0
7 27
8:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 2 0 0 3
0 0 0 5 25
8:45 AM 0 0 2 2
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26
0 0 0 49 0
Peak Hour 0 0 4 4
Count Total 0 0 10 8 0 3 13 0 0 12 0 3 0
Westbound Northbound Southbound

LT TH RT LT TH RT LT
25 0
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave Alameda de las Pulgas n/a 15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound
0 1 9 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
7:15 AM 0 2 0 1 2
1 0 0 0 0 0

TH RT LT TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 5 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 2 0 0 2
2 0 0 0 6 12
7 8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
4 16
8:45 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0
0 5 12
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 2 17
Count Total 0 7 0 1 9 0 5 0
Peak Hour 0 3 0 0 6 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 16 0
2 0 0 0 24 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
3 7
2 3
4 3
3 5
30 13
WB 0.5% 0.90
NB 0.2% 0.87
Peak Hour: 4:45 PM 5:45 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.9% 0.90
Date: 10/10/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave Alameda de las Pulgas n/a 15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
SB - -
TOTAL 0.6% 0.94
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 127 56 0 72 108

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
0 79 105 0 0 51
0 0 0 469 0
4:15 PM 0 0 88 73
0 0 38 0 68 0
0 0 0 383 0
4:45 PM 0 0 100 47
0 0 46 0 42 0
459 0
4:30 PM 0 0 84 65 0 49 97
0 63 0 0 0 0
490 1,801
5:00 PM 0 0 105 77 0 87 137
0 70 145 0 0 56 0 72 0 0 0 0
0 68 124 0 0 77
0 0 0 529 1,861
5:15 PM 0 0 110 63
0 0 61 0 62 0
0 0 0 452 1,986
5:45 PM 0 0 98 55
0 0 55 0 65 0
515 1,917
5:30 PM 0 0 94 59 0 62 117
0 73 0 0 0 0
0 44 127 0 0 68 0 66 0 0 0 0 458 1,954
Count Total 0 0 806 495 0 531 960 0 0 0 3,755 0
Peak
Hour
All 0 0 409
0 0 452 0 511 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0
0 1,986 0
HV 0 0 2 4 0 1
246 0 287 523 0 0 249 0 272 0 0 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - - 0% 2% - 0% 1% - - 0% - 0% - - - - 1%
1 2
4:15 PM 2 2 2 0 6 2 0
0 1 0 1 0 0
West North South
4:00 PM 8 2 0 0 10 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 2 1 0 0 3
0 4 0 0 1 1
0 4:30 PM 1 1 1 0 3 2 1 1
0 0 2 3 0 4
3 0
5:15 PM 1 2 0 0 3 1 4
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 2 1
5:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 2 0
5:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2
0 2 0 0 2 1
3 5:30 PM 2 1 1 0 4 1 1 0
1 0 6 0 0 0
0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 1
15 9
Peak Hr 6 4 1 0 11 3 5
Count Total 18 10 4 0 32 7 8 4 0 19 6 0
2 0 10 1 0 7 5
0 3
1 1
5 0
7 5
0 1
N
Alameda de las Pulgas
San Carlos Ave
San Carlos Ave
Alameda de las
Pulgas
San Carlos Ave
TEV: 1,986
PHF: 0.94
523
287 810
681
0 249
272
533
521
0 246
409 655
772
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave Alameda de las Pulgas n/a 15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
0 0 0 10 0
4:15 PM 0 0 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 5 3 0 1 1

UT LT TH RT UT LT
6 0
4:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 2
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 13
5:15 PM 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 22
5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 10
5:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 11
5:45 PM 0 0 0 1
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10
0 0 0 32 0
Peak Hour 0 0 2 4
Count Total 0 0 9 9 0 4 6 0 0 2 0 2 0
Westbound Northbound Southbound

LT TH RT LT TH RT LT
11 0
Interval
Start
San Carlos Ave San Carlos Ave Alameda de las Pulgas n/a 15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound
0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
4:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0

TH RT LT TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0
4 0
4:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1 0 0 0 0 0
0 2 0
4:30 PM 0 2 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 1 0 0 4
0 0 0 0 0 8
9 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 2
2 10
5:45 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 6 12
5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 2 10
Count Total 0 7 0 1 7 0 2 0
Peak Hour 0 3 0 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 10 0
2 0 0 0 19 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
2 3
5 6
5 5
2 2
30 18
Date: 09/19/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB 0.6% 0.91
TOTAL 2.1% 0.96
TH RT
WB 5.1% 0.90
NB 2.6% 0.78
Peak Hour: 7:45 AM 8:45 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.9% 0.85

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Alameda de las Pulgas Alameda de las Pulgas 15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
0 19 18 7 0 3
8 24 5 153 0
7:15 AM 0 10 22 4
7:00 AM 0 4 24 4 0 13 16 4 0 5 28 18 0
20 63 16 317 0
7:45 AM 0 15 37 10
8 0 4 62 23 0
222 0
7:30 AM 0 13 41 8 0 23 36
41 19 0 18 45 16
406 1,098
8:00 AM 0 32 50 20 0 33 44
0 30 51 16 0 4 110 22 0 18 66 27
0 25 61 18 0 13
30 76 23 435 1,380
8:15 AM 0 27 47 15
12 0 9 92 14 0
24 95 23 399 1,676
8:45 AM 0 17 48 14
19 0 8 47 22 0
436 1,594
8:30 AM 0 28 52 14 0 29 38
59 26 0 37 70 38
0 31 29 22 0 8 54 34 0 21 92 24 394 1,664
Count Total 0 146 321 89 0 203 293 176 531 172 2,762 0
Peak
Hour
All 0 102 186
106 0 54 493 178 0
11 0 0 2 7 2 0 2 1 0 36 0
111 1,676 0
HV 0 1 1 1 0 8
59 0 117 194 65 0 34 308 84 0 109 307
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - 1% 1% 2% - 7% 6% 0% - 6% 2% 2% - 2% 0% 0% 2%
0 0
7:15 AM 0 1 4 1 6 1 0
0 2 1 5 0 2
West North South
7:00 AM 0 3 0 1 4 2
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 0 6 3 0 9
0 2 1 2 2 0
2 7:30 AM 1 3 3 2 9 1 0 1
0 2 3 0 1 0
1 1
8:15 AM 1 5 2 1 9 1 1
0 0 1 1 2 1
1 1 4
8:00 AM 2 4 2 1 9 0
0 0 2 3 5 0
8:45 AM 2 5 0 3 10
3 4 1 1 0 0
2 8:30 AM 0 4 4 1 9 0 0 1
2 1 5 1 2 0
0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
4 9
Peak Hour 3 19 11 3 36 1 1
Count Total 6 31 18 10 65 5 1 8 12 26 5 12
5 8 15 4 5 2 7
0 0
1 0
80 04
1 0
0 1
2 7
5 4
N
Alameda de las Pulgas
Brittan Ave
Brittan Ave
Alameda de
las Pulgas
Brittan AveAlameda de
las Pulgas
TEV: 1,676
PHF: 0.96
111
307
109
527
475
0 65
194
117
376
379
0 84
308
34 483
426
0 59
186
102
347
339
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Alameda de las Pulgas Alameda de las Pulgas 15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
0 0 1 4 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 2

UT LT TH RT UT LT
6 0
7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0
0 3 3 0 0 0
1 1 0 9 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 2 0
1 0 0 9 33
8:15 AM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 2 0 0
9 28
8:00 AM 0 1 0 1 0 1 3
3 0 0 0 0 0
9 36
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 1
0 1 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
0 4 1 0 0 0
1 0 0 9 36
8:45 AM 0 0 2 0
0 0 1 2 1 0
0 0 0 1 1 1 10 37
4 4 2 65 0
Peak Hour 0 1 1 1
Count Total 0 1 4 1 0 14 16 1 0 2 10 6 0
7:00 AM 5 0
RT
36 0
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Alameda de las Pulgas Alameda de las Pulgas 15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 8 11 0 0 2 7 2 0 2 1 0

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
15 8:00 AM
0 2 0 5
2 0
7:45 AM
0 1 0 0
0 7:30 AM
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3
0 0
0 0 0
4 15
8:45 AM
0 1 0 0
13 8:30 AM
0 1 1 0 1 0 5
1 11
8:15 AM
0 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 12
0 LT TH
0 4 1 0 8 0 15
0 5 3 0 26 0
3 0
0 1
0 2 0 0
0 0
0 1 0
1 LT TH
0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1 0 0
1 4 0 1 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 3 0
0 1 0
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
0 4
2 2
6 1
1 6
22 10
Date: 09/19/2023
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB 0.8% 0.92
TOTAL 1.0% 0.97
TH RT
WB 1.3% 0.97
NB 1.3% 0.98
Peak Hour: 4:45 PM 5:45 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.3% 0.92

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Alameda de las Pulgas Alameda de las Pulgas 15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
0 28 43 28 0 10
24 78 21 422 0
4:15 PM 0 22 45 13
4:00 PM 0 24 54 14 0 35 55 19 0 11 60 27 0
21 57 20 409 0
4:45 PM 0 15 43 10
29 0 9 55 29 0
419 0
4:30 PM 0 27 57 10 0 33 62
86 32 0 13 73 26
454 1,704
5:00 PM 0 32 46 15 0 32 69
0 35 70 30 0 15 77 27 0 22 81 29
0 35 59 39 0 9
19 83 28 467 1,749
5:15 PM 0 24 59 7
27 0 10 82 24 0
19 70 23 449 1,816
5:45 PM 0 23 38 5
33 0 15 86 18 0
446 1,776
5:30 PM 0 21 63 6 0 33 62
82 21 0 22 72 17
0 31 58 37 0 13 92 21 0 18 69 23 428 1,790
Count Total 0 188 405 80 0 262 478 158 583 187 3,494 0
Peak
Hour
All 0 92 211
242 0 92 620 199 0
4 1 0 0 1 5 0 1 2 1 18 0
97 1,816 0
HV 0 0 1 0 0 2
38 0 135 260 129 0 49 327 90 0 82 306
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
HV% - 0% 0% 0% - 1% 2% 1% - 0% 0% 6% - 1% 1% 1% 1%
0 0
4:15 PM 1 0 3 2 6 0 1
0 2 0 3 0 0
West North South
4:00 PM 0 1 0 3 4 1
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 0 5 1 2 8
1 2 0 0 1 1
1 4:30 PM 3 1 1 1 6 0 1 0
3 1 5 0 2 1
0 3
5:15 PM 0 2 0 1 3 0 0
0 2 1 3 0 3
1 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 3 0 3 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
5:45 PM 0 2 1 0 3
0 2 0 0 1 0
0 5:30 PM 1 0 2 1 4 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 3 1 4 0 3 0 3
3 8
Peak Hour 1 7 6 4 18 0 0
Count Total 5 11 11 10 37 1 2 13 4 20 1 10
5 1 6 1 5 1 3
0 0
0 1
00 04
1 0
0 0
1 3
5 1
N
Alameda de las Pulgas
Brittan Ave
Brittan Ave
Alameda de
las Pulgas
Brittan AveAlameda de
las Pulgas
TEV: 1,816
PHF: 0.97
97 306
82 485
548
0 129
260
135
524
383
0 90
327
49 479
466
0 38
211
92 341
406
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any.

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Alameda de las Pulgas Alameda de las Pulgas 15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour Eastbound Westbound
1 2 0 4 0
4:15 PM 0 0 1 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
6 0
4:30 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 1
0 1 3 1 0 0
1 0 0 6 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 3 23
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 2 0
8 24
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1 1
3 20
5:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 1 0 0
1 0 0 4 18
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 3 13
3 5 2 37 0
Peak Hour 0 0 1 0
Count Total 0 0 5 0 0 3 5 3 0 0 5 6 0
4:00 PM 3 0
RT
18 0
Interval
Start
Brittan Ave Brittan Ave Alameda de las Pulgas Alameda de las Pulgas 15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 2 4 1 0 0 1 5 0 1 2 1

LT TH RT RT LT TH RT
11 5:00 PM
0 1 0 1
2 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
4:15 PM 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 5
1 0
0 0 0
2 6
5:45 PM
0 2 0 0
6 5:30 PM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 11
5:15 PM
0 1 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 9
Peak Hour
Count Total 0 3
0 LT TH
0 4 1 0 0 1 6
0 11 2 1 20 0
0 0
0 1
0 1 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 LT TH
0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 2 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0
0 0 0
0 0 1
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] B Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 2025
Appendix B
Intersection Level of Service Calculations (Existing Conditions)

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: El Camino Real & Holly Street 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 22 441 14 421 259 131 22 548 361 168 561 37Future Volume (veh/h) 22 441 14 421 259 131 22 548 361 168 561 37Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000004000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 459 13 439 270 116 23 571 271 175 584 36Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 27 573 17 928 502 418 230 1330 1036 229 1033 64Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.75 0.75 0.07 0.30 0.30Sat Flow, veh/h 165 3444 102 3456 1870 1558 1781 3554 2767 3456 3400 209Grp Volume(v), veh/h 260 0 235 439 270 116 23 571 271 175 305 315Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1862 0 1849 1728 1870 1558 1781 1777 1384 1728 1777 1833Q Serve(g_s), s 17.6 0.0 15.8 13.8 16.0 7.6 1.3 7.7 4.0 6.5 18.7 18.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.6 0.0 15.8 13.8 16.0 7.6 1.3 7.7 4.0 6.5 18.7 18.8Prop In Lane 0.09 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 310 0 307 928 502 418 230 1330 1036 229 540 557V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.00 0.76 0.47 0.54 0.28 0.10 0.43 0.26 0.76 0.56 0.57Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 457 0 454 928 502 418 230 1330 1036 359 540 557HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.00 0.97 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.5 0.0 51.8 39.8 40.7 37.6 42.5 11.2 10.8 59.7 38.0 38.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.6 0.0 2.1 1.4 3.4 1.3 0.1 0.9 0.6 3.9 4.2 4.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.8 0.0 7.6 6.2 8.0 3.1 0.6 2.6 1.3 2.9 8.7 9.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.1 0.0 53.8 41.3 44.0 38.9 42.5 12.1 11.6 63.6 42.3 42.2LnGrp LOS E A D D D D D B B E D DApproach Vol, veh/h 495 825 865 795Approach Delay, s/veh 56.1 41.8 12.8 46.9Approach LOS E D B DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.3 44.0 39.0 12.1 53.2 25.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 * 4.5 4.1 3.5 4.5 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 * 40 34.9 13.5 33.5 31.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 20.8 18.0 8.5 9.7 19.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.5 5.2 0.2 5.1 1.3Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 37.1HCM 6th LOS DNotesUser approved ignoring U-Turning movement.* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary2: Old Country Rd & Holly Street 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 81 756 101 36 606 17 56 130 130 54 137 131Future Volume (veh/h) 81 756 101 36 606 17 56 130 130 54 137 131Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 83 771 103 37 618 17 57 133 133 55 140 134Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 111 1087 505 39 680 20 397 255 255 71 199 162Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.11 0.11Sat Flow, veh/h 337 3293 1531 195 3414 98 1781 835 835 1781 1870 1525Grp Volume(v), veh/h 456 398 103 353 0 319 57 0 266 55 140 134Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1853 1777 1531 1861 0 1847 1781 0 1670 1781 1870 1525Q Serve(g_s), s 28.4 25.1 6.3 24.4 0.0 21.7 3.3 0.0 17.1 4.0 9.4 11.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.4 25.1 6.3 24.4 0.0 21.7 3.3 0.0 17.1 4.0 9.4 11.2Prop In Lane 0.18 1.00 0.10 0.05 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 612 586 505 371 0 368 397 0 510 71 199 162V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.68 0.20 0.95 0.00 0.87 0.14 0.00 0.52 0.78 0.70 0.82Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 612 586 505 371 0 368 397 0 510 89 430 351HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.78 0.78 0.78 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.7 37.6 31.3 51.4 0.0 50.4 40.6 0.0 37.3 61.9 56.1 56.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.4 4.9 0.7 36.1 0.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 21.7 18.8 35.9Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 14.1 11.8 2.5 15.1 0.0 12.5 1.5 0.0 7.1 2.2 5.5 5.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.1 42.5 32.0 87.5 0.0 73.4 40.6 0.0 37.6 83.6 74.9 92.8LnGrp LOS D D C F A E D A D F E FApproach Vol, veh/h 957 672 323 329Approach Delay, s/veh 42.6 80.8 38.1 83.6Approach LOS D F D FTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 44.8 30.0 34.1 18.9 47.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.1 4.1 5.1 * 5.1 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 38.9 25.9 15.0 * 30 42.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 19.1 26.4 5.3 13.2 30.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 7.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 59.1HCM 6th LOS ENotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Industrial Rd & Holly St 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 3Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 66 847 25 482 633 387 21 87 372 164 90 33Future Volume (veh/h) 66 847 25 482 633 387 21 87 372 164 90 33Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 66 847 25 482 633 387 21 87 372 164 90 33Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 103 1406 43 1445 1486 663 44 184 1434 218 353 123Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.14 0.14Sat Flow, veh/h 357 4889 149 3456 3554 1585 1781 1870 2712 3456 2571 895Grp Volume(v), veh/h 342 286 310 482 633 387 21 87 372 164 61 62Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1853 1702 1840 1728 1777 1585 1781 1870 1356 1728 1777 1689Q Serve(g_s), s 21.0 18.7 18.7 12.3 16.4 24.4 1.5 5.7 10.0 6.1 4.0 4.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 21.0 18.7 18.7 12.3 16.4 24.4 1.5 5.7 10.0 6.1 4.0 4.3Prop In Lane 0.19 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 533 490 529 1445 1486 663 44 184 1434 218 244 232V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.58 0.59 0.33 0.43 0.58 0.48 0.47 0.26 0.75 0.25 0.27Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 533 490 529 1445 1486 663 226 294 1592 439 279 265HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.5 39.6 39.7 25.6 26.8 29.1 62.6 55.4 17.6 59.9 50.1 50.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.9 5.0 4.7 0.1 0.1 1.1 3.0 0.7 0.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.5 8.6 9.3 5.1 7.0 9.4 0.7 2.7 6.1 2.7 1.8 1.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.3 44.7 44.3 25.7 26.9 30.2 65.6 56.1 17.6 61.8 50.3 50.5LnGrp LOS D D D C C C EEBEDDApproach Vol, veh/h 938 1502 480 287Approach Delay, s/veh 45.2 27.4 26.7 56.9Approach LOS D C C ETimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.9 11.7 17.4 42.0 6.7 22.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.6Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.5 16.5 20.4 37.4 16.5 20.4Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 26.4 8.1 12.0 23.0 3.5 6.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.1 0.2 0.8 4.5 0.0 0.3Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.1HCM 6th LOS D HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: El Camino Real & San Carlos Avenue 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 4Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 350 174 91 573 665 312Future Volume (vph) 350 174 91 573 665 312Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1479 1770 3539 3539 1553Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1479 1770 3539 3539 1553Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 372 185 97 610 707 332RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 80 0 0 0 169Lane Group Flow (vph) 372 105 97 610 707 163Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 38 5Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA PermProtected Phases 8 1 6 2Permitted Phases 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 24.3 24.3 14.5 72.1 54.1 54.1Effective Green, g (s) 24.3 24.3 14.5 72.1 54.1 54.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.55 0.42 0.42Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 641 276 197 1962 1472 646v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 c0.05 0.17 c0.20v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.10v/c Ratio 0.58 0.38 0.49 0.31 0.48 0.25Uniform Delay, d1 48.2 46.3 54.3 15.6 27.7 24.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.11 0.96 1.24 2.36Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.3 1.4 0.4 1.0 0.8Delay (s) 49.1 46.6 61.4 15.3 35.3 59.3Level of Service D D E B D EApproach Delay (s) 48.2 21.6 43.0Approach LOS D C DIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 37.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: El Camino Real & Brittan Avenue 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 5Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 50 380 41 188 255 87 58 564 114 251 641 45Future Volume (veh/h) 50 380 41 188 255 87 58 564 114 251 641 45Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 52 396 41 196 266 55 60 588 97 261 668 37Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 66 523 57 429 428 381 77 1326 592 314 2083 115Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.18 0.84 0.84Sat Flow, veh/h 372 2960 320 1781 1777 1583 1781 3554 1585 3456 4950 273Grp Volume(v), veh/h 259 0 230 196 266 55 60 588 97 261 458 247Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1852 0 1801 1781 1777 1583 1781 1777 1585 1728 1702 1819Q Serve(g_s), s 17.4 0.0 15.7 12.2 17.4 3.6 4.3 16.2 5.3 9.5 3.8 3.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.4 0.0 15.7 12.2 17.4 3.6 4.3 16.2 5.3 9.5 3.8 3.8Prop In Lane 0.20 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 327 0 318 429 428 381 77 1326 592 314 1433 766V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.72 0.46 0.62 0.14 0.78 0.44 0.16 0.83 0.32 0.32Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 453 0 440 429 428 381 164 1326 592 585 1433 766HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.92 0.00 0.92 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.2 0.0 50.5 42.1 44.1 38.8 61.6 30.6 27.2 52.2 6.3 6.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.1 0.0 2.7 0.3 0.6 0.1 5.2 0.9 0.5 2.2 0.6 1.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.5 0.0 7.3 5.4 7.7 1.4 2.1 7.0 2.1 3.8 1.3 1.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.3 0.0 53.2 42.4 44.7 38.9 66.7 31.5 27.7 54.4 6.9 7.4LnGrp LOS E A D D D D E C C D A AApproach Vol, veh/h 489 517 745 966Approach Delay, s/veh 54.8 43.2 33.8 19.8Approach LOS D D C BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.6 59.2 35.0 14.8 53.0 27.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.7 3.0 4.5 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 39.5 31.3 22.0 29.5 31.8Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.3 5.8 19.4 11.5 18.2 19.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.1 3.1 0.4 4.2 2.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.4HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary6: Old Country Rd & Brittan Avenue 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 27 75 95 51 183 30 196 475 54 17 302 27Future Volume (veh/h) 27 75 95 51 183 30 196 475 54 17 302 27Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 29 81 102 55 197 32 211 511 58 18 325 29Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 471 1411 809 203 774 428 110 358 41 55 407 337Arrive On Green 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22Sat Flow, veh/h 901 2701 1549 749 2860 1582 1027 1643 187 843 1870 1550Grp Volume(v), veh/h 59 51 102 135 117 32 211 0 569 18 325 29Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1825 1777 1549 1833 1777 1582 1027 0 1830 843 1870 1550Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 1.8 4.4 7.5 6.7 2.0 6.9 0.0 28.3 0.0 21.4 1.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 1.8 4.4 7.5 6.7 2.0 28.3 0.0 28.3 28.3 21.4 1.9Prop In Lane 0.49 1.00 0.41 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 953 928 809 496 481 428 110 0 398 55 407 337V/C Ratio(X) 0.06 0.06 0.13 0.27 0.24 0.07 1.92 0.00 1.43 0.32 0.80 0.09Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 953 928 809 496 481 428 110 0 398 55 407 337HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.92 0.92 0.92Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.3 15.3 15.9 37.3 37.0 35.3 63.3 0.0 50.9 65.0 48.1 40.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 0.8 0.2 444.7 0.0 206.8 13.8 13.9 0.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.8 1.6 3.5 3.1 0.8 17.2 0.0 35.7 0.8 11.5 0.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.4 15.4 16.1 38.2 37.8 35.5 507.9 0.0 257.6 78.8 62.1 41.0LnGrp LOS B B B D D D F A F E E DApproach Vol, veh/h 212 284 780 372Approach Delay, s/veh 15.7 37.7 325.3 61.3Approach LOS B D F ETimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 39.6 32.4 72.0 32.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.1 4.1 * 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 27.9 67.9 * 28Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.5 30.3 6.4 30.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 176.3HCM 6th LOS FNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
7: Industrial Rd & Brittan Avenue 11/01/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 7Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 152 402 32 257 340 53 73 288 75 46 148 66Future Volume (vph) 152 402 32 257 340 53 73 288 75 46 148 66Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95Flt Protected 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3465 3428 1770 3539 1547 1770 3351Flt Permitted 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3465 3428 1770 3539 1547 1770 3351Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Adj. Flow (vph) 167 442 35 282 374 58 80 316 82 51 163 73RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 67 0 41 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 641 0 0 710 0 80 316 15 51 195 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 52Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 26Turn Type Split NA Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NAProtected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 26.0 28.2 8.9 18.2 18.2 7.5 16.8Effective Green, g (s) 26.0 28.2 8.9 18.2 18.2 7.5 16.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.29 0.09 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.17Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 917 984 160 655 286 135 573v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 c0.21 0.05 c0.09 0.03 c0.06v/s Ratio Perm 0.01v/c Ratio 0.70 0.72 0.50 0.48 0.05 0.38 0.34Uniform Delay, d1 32.6 31.5 42.5 35.8 32.9 43.1 35.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 2.8 3.3 1.6 0.2 2.4 1.0Delay (s) 35.1 34.3 45.9 37.4 33.1 45.5 36.8Level of Service D C D D C D DApproach Delay (s) 35.1 34.3 38.1 38.4Approach LOS D C D DIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 35.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63Actuated Cycle Length (s) 98.2 Sum of lost time (s) 18.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary8: El Camino Real & Howard Ave 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 8Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 51 228 36 160 67 75 35 569 263 69 771 29Future Volume (veh/h) 51 228 36 160 67 75 35 569 263 69 771 29Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 238 35 167 70 47 36 593 64 72 803 12Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 166 694 101 292 519 438 45 857 374 646 3075 46Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.03 0.24 0.24 0.36 0.59 0.59Sat Flow, veh/h 429 2502 365 1103 1870 1580 1781 3554 1551 1781 5182 77Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 0 156 167 70 47 36 593 64 72 527 288Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1668 0 1627 1103 1870 1580 1781 1777 1551 1781 1702 1855Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 0.0 7.8 14.4 2.8 2.2 2.0 15.3 3.3 2.7 7.5 7.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 0.0 7.8 22.2 2.8 2.2 2.0 15.3 3.3 2.7 7.5 7.5Prop In Lane 0.31 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 509 0 451 292 519 438 45 857 374 646 2020 1101V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.00 0.35 0.57 0.14 0.11 0.79 0.69 0.17 0.11 0.26 0.26Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 509 0 451 292 519 438 176 1812 791 646 2020 1101HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.1 0.0 29.2 38.0 27.4 27.2 49.0 34.9 30.3 21.4 9.9 9.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 2.1 7.2 0.5 0.4 11.0 4.6 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.5 0.0 3.3 4.4 1.3 0.9 1.0 7.0 1.3 1.1 2.7 3.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.8 0.0 31.3 45.2 27.9 27.6 60.0 39.4 31.3 21.4 10.2 10.4LnGrp LOS C A C D C C E D C C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 326 284 693 887Approach Delay, s/veh 31.1 38.0 39.8 11.2Approach LOS C D D BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.6 64.4 31.0 41.1 28.9 31.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 * 4.5 3.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 52.5 28.0 11.0 * 52 26.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.0 9.5 9.8 4.7 17.3 24.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.9 2.5 0.0 6.6 0.3Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.7HCM 6th LOS CNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
9: Old Country Rd & Howard Ave 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 9Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 22 53 64 71 72 27 232 254 106 9 150 11Future Volume (veh/h) 22 53 64 71 72 27 232 254 106 9 150 11Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 56 67 75 76 28 244 267 112 9 158 12Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 1110 1165 959 106 113 42 246 401 324 139 401 333Arrive On Green 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.43 0.43 0.43Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1540 1431 1530 573 1215 1870 1507 1003 1870 1550Grp Volume(v), veh/h 23 56 67 94 0 85 244 267 112 9 158 12Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1540 1799 0 1735 1215 1870 1507 1003 1870 1550Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 1.5 2.2 6.7 0.0 6.2 20.4 17.0 8.2 1.0 7.5 0.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 1.5 2.2 6.7 0.0 6.2 27.9 17.0 8.2 18.0 7.5 0.6Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1110 1165 959 133 0 128 246 401 324 139 401 333V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.71 0.00 0.66 0.99 0.67 0.35 0.06 0.39 0.04Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1110 1165 959 295 0 284 246 401 324 139 401 333HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.71 0.71Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.4 9.5 9.7 58.8 0.0 58.6 57.1 46.8 43.3 41.5 31.3 29.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.6 0.0 2.2 55.7 8.4 2.9 0.6 2.1 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.6 0.8 3.1 0.0 2.8 11.9 8.8 3.3 0.2 3.3 0.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 9.4 9.6 9.8 61.4 0.0 60.8 112.8 55.2 46.2 42.1 33.3 29.4LnGrp LOS A A A E A E F E DDCCApproach Vol, veh/h 146 179 623 179Approach Delay, s/veh 9.7 61.1 76.1 33.5Approach LOS A E E CTimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 84.7 32.0 13.3 32.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.1 3.7 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 69.3 27.9 21.3 27.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 20.0 8.7 29.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 58.4HCM 6th LOS E HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary10: Club Dr/Dartmouth Ave & San Carlos Ave 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 10Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 73 271 75 28 335 103 147 76 43 114 49 120Future Volume (veh/h) 73 271 75 28 335 103 147 76 43 114 49 120Initial Q (Qb), veh 010070011042Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.48Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 83 308 76 32 381 100 167 86 25 130 56 51Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 138 527 127 81 453 95 211 131 137 225 124 148Arrive On Green 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.05 0.33 0.33 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.19Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1427 352 1781 1339 351 1195 615 753 1263 544 762Grp Volume(v), veh/h 83 0 384 32 0 481 253 0 25 186 0 51Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1779 1781 0 1690 1811 0 753 1807 0 762Q Serve(g_s), s 3.2 0.0 12.6 1.3 0.0 19.1 9.6 0.0 2.0 6.7 0.0 4.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.2 0.0 12.6 1.3 0.0 19.1 9.6 0.0 2.0 6.7 0.0 4.2Prop In Lane 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.21 0.66 1.00 0.70 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 138 0 649 81 0 569 329 0 137 348 0 148V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.00 0.59 0.39 0.00 0.85 0.77 0.00 0.18 0.53 0.00 0.34Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 372 0 869 372 0 825 637 0 265 636 0 268HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.2 0.0 18.7 34.5 0.0 25.9 28.4 0.0 25.4 27.3 0.0 26.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.2 0.0 0.9 3.1 0.0 5.5 3.8 0.0 0.6 1.3 0.0 1.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 2.0 0.0 2.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.6 0.0 5.1 0.6 0.0 11.1 4.6 0.0 0.5 3.7 0.0 1.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.4 0.0 19.6 37.6 0.0 38.5 32.5 0.0 26.5 30.6 0.0 29.3LnGrp LOS D A B D A D C A C C A CApproach Vol, veh/h 467 513 278 237Approach Delay, s/veh 22.8 38.4 31.9 30.4Approach LOS C D C CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 31.1 17.3 9.2 28.8 16.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.7 3.5 4.9 3.7Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 35.1 25.3 15.0 35.1 25.3Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 14.6 8.7 5.2 21.1 11.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.4 1.3 0.1 2.8 1.4Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.1HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Alameda de las Pulgas & San Carlos Ave 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 11 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 531 210 174 448 210 333Future Volume (veh/h) 531 210 174 448 210 333Initial Q (Qb), veh 500610Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 565 116 185 477 223 317Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 770 633 251 1165 403 587Arrive On Green 0.41 0.41 0.14 0.62 0.23 0.23Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1540 1781 1870 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 565 116 185 477 223 317Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1540 1781 1870 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 14.2 2.7 5.5 7.2 6.2 8.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 2.7 5.5 7.2 6.2 8.8Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 770 633 251 1165 403 587V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.18 0.74 0.41 0.55 0.54Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1337 1101 960 1337 954 1073HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.0 10.8 23.7 5.8 19.3 14.1Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 0.2 5.9 0.3 1.2 0.8Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.9 0.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 8.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.1 11.0 29.5 6.5 20.5 14.9LnGrp LOS B B C A C BApproach Vol, veh/h 681 662 540Approach Delay, s/veh 16.9 12.9 17.2Approach LOS B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.9 27.0 16.7 38.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 * 4.2 * 4.2 * 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 40 * 30 * 40Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.5 16.2 10.8 9.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 6.5 1.7 5.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.6HCM 6th LOS BNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary12: Alameda de las Pulgas & Brittan Avenue 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing AM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 12Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 102 186 59 117 194 65 34 308 84 109 307 111Future Volume (veh/h) 102 186 59 117 194 65 34 308 84 109 307 111Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000010000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 106 194 19 122 202 51 35 321 63 114 320 79Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 138 252 325 337 273 69 63 405 78 146 452 112Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.04 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.31 0.31Sat Flow, veh/h 649 1189 1534 1781 1440 364 1781 1506 296 1781 1436 355Grp Volume(v), veh/h 300 0 19 122 0 253 35 0 384 114 0 399Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1838 0 1534 1781 0 1804 1781 0 1802 1781 0 1791Q Serve(g_s), s 10.7 0.0 0.7 4.1 0.0 9.2 1.3 0.0 13.8 4.4 0.0 13.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.7 0.0 0.7 4.1 0.0 9.2 1.3 0.0 13.8 4.4 0.0 13.7Prop In Lane 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.20Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 390 0 325 337 0 342 63 0 484 146 0 564V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.06 0.36 0.00 0.74 0.56 0.00 0.79 0.78 0.00 0.71Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1081 0 902 1047 0 1061 770 0 1171 770 0 1164HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.9 0.0 22.0 24.6 0.0 26.7 33.2 0.0 23.8 31.5 0.0 21.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 3.2 2.8 0.0 3.0 3.4 0.0 1.6Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.8 0.0 0.2 1.7 0.0 4.1 0.6 0.0 6.1 2.0 0.0 5.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.2 0.0 22.0 25.3 0.0 29.9 36.0 0.0 27.0 34.9 0.0 22.7LnGrp LOS C A C C A C D A C C A CApproach Vol, veh/h 319 375 419 513Approach Delay, s/veh 28.7 28.4 27.7 25.4Approach LOS C C C CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.7 23.4 18.9 6.5 26.6 17.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 * 4.2 4.0 4.9 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 45.1 * 41 30.0 45.1 40.8Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 15.8 12.7 3.3 15.7 11.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.6 1.9 0.0 2.7 1.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.3HCM 6th LOS CNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: El Camino Real & Holly Street 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 61 208 26 501 272 242 27 695 390 147 642 45Future Volume (veh/h) 61 208 26 501 272 242 27 695 390 147 642 45Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 63 214 18 516 280 208 28 716 266 152 662 39Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 85 303 26 1061 574 479 324 1406 1095 206 905 53Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.36 0.79 0.79 0.06 0.27 0.27Sat Flow, veh/h 746 2674 234 3456 1870 1562 1781 3554 2769 3456 3410 201Grp Volume(v), veh/h 155 0 140 516 280 208 28 716 266 152 345 356Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1833 0 1821 1728 1870 1562 1781 1777 1384 1728 1777 1834Q Serve(g_s), s 10.6 0.0 9.6 15.8 15.9 13.8 1.3 9.2 3.2 5.6 23.0 23.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.6 0.0 9.6 15.8 15.9 13.8 1.3 9.2 3.2 5.6 23.0 23.0Prop In Lane 0.41 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 208 0 206 1061 574 479 324 1406 1095 206 472 487V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.00 0.68 0.49 0.49 0.43 0.09 0.51 0.24 0.74 0.73 0.73Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 450 0 447 1061 574 479 324 1406 1095 359 472 487HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.8 0.0 55.4 36.7 36.7 36.0 34.2 9.2 8.5 60.1 43.5 43.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 0.0 1.5 1.2 2.2 2.1 0.0 1.2 0.5 3.8 9.6 9.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.1 0.0 4.5 7.0 7.7 5.6 0.6 2.7 1.0 2.6 11.3 11.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.8 0.0 56.8 37.9 38.9 38.1 34.3 10.3 9.0 63.9 53.1 52.9LnGrp LOS E A E D D D C B A E D DApproach Vol, veh/h 295 1004 1010 853Approach Delay, s/veh 57.3 38.2 10.6 55.0Approach LOS E D B DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.2 39.0 44.0 11.3 55.9 18.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 * 4.5 4.1 3.5 4.5 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 * 35 39.9 13.5 28.5 31.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 25.0 17.9 7.6 11.2 12.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.9 7.0 0.2 5.6 0.8Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.7HCM 6th LOS DNotesUser approved ignoring U-Turning movement.* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary2: Old Country Rd & Holly Street 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 87 582 61 23 762 14 101 232 124 37 129 138Future Volume (veh/h) 87 582 61 23 762 14 101 232 124 37 129 138Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 91 606 64 24 794 15 105 242 129 39 134 144Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 111 778 374 25 870 17 454 401 214 50 211 172Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.36 0.36 0.03 0.11 0.11Sat Flow, veh/h 452 3172 1523 102 3547 70 1781 1128 601 1781 1870 1528Grp Volume(v), veh/h 372 325 64 437 0 396 105 0 371 39 134 144Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1848 1777 1523 1865 0 1854 1781 0 1730 1781 1870 1528Q Serve(g_s), s 24.7 22.0 4.3 30.0 0.0 26.6 6.1 0.0 22.9 2.8 8.9 12.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 24.7 22.0 4.3 30.0 0.0 26.6 6.1 0.0 22.9 2.8 8.9 12.0Prop In Lane 0.24 1.00 0.05 0.04 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 453 436 374 458 0 455 454 0 615 50 211 172V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.75 0.17 0.96 0.00 0.87 0.23 0.00 0.60 0.78 0.64 0.84Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 453 436 374 458 0 455 454 0 615 89 430 351HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.94 0.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.3 45.3 38.6 48.4 0.0 47.1 38.3 0.0 34.3 62.8 55.1 56.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.5 9.7 0.9 32.3 0.0 19.7 0.1 0.0 4.1 9.3 13.8 36.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 13.1 11.0 1.7 18.2 0.0 14.9 2.7 0.0 10.3 1.4 5.0 6.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 59.8 55.0 39.5 80.7 0.0 66.8 38.4 0.0 38.4 72.1 68.9 92.5LnGrp LOS E E D F A E D A D E E FApproach Vol, veh/h 761 833 476 317Approach Delay, s/veh 56.1 74.1 38.4 80.0Approach LOS E E D ETimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.7 51.3 36.0 38.3 19.7 36.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.1 4.1 5.1 * 5.1 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 43.9 31.9 20.0 * 30 31.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 24.9 32.0 8.1 14.0 26.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.6 2.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 62.0HCM 6th LOS ENotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Industrial Rd & Holly St 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 3Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 34 699 30 316 718 315 58 187 729 321 131 57Future Volume (veh/h) 34 699 30 316 718 315 58 187 729 321 131 57Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 35 728 31 329 748 328 60 195 759 334 136 59Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 44 968 42 1402 1442 643 77 349 1641 309 568 234Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.04 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.23 0.23Sat Flow, veh/h 224 4945 217 3456 3554 1585 1781 1870 2733 3456 2441 1006Grp Volume(v), veh/h 291 242 261 329 748 328 60 195 759 334 97 98Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1859 1702 1825 1728 1777 1585 1781 1870 1366 1728 1777 1670Q Serve(g_s), s 20.9 18.7 18.8 8.8 22.2 21.7 4.7 13.3 22.0 12.5 6.2 6.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.9 18.7 18.8 8.8 22.2 21.7 4.7 13.3 22.0 12.5 6.2 6.7Prop In Lane 0.12 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 364 333 357 1402 1442 643 77 349 1641 309 413 388V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.73 0.73 0.23 0.52 0.51 0.78 0.56 0.46 1.08 0.23 0.25Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 590 540 579 1402 1442 643 210 460 1803 309 413 388HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.7 52.8 52.8 27.3 31.3 31.2 66.3 51.7 16.1 63.8 43.6 43.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 16.7 13.0 12.4 0.4 1.3 2.9 6.2 0.5 0.1 75.0 0.1 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 11.6 9.3 9.9 3.8 9.9 8.8 2.2 6.3 13.6 8.7 2.8 2.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 70.3 65.8 65.2 27.7 32.7 34.1 72.5 52.2 16.2 138.8 43.7 43.9LnGrp LOS E E E C C C E D B F D DApproach Vol, veh/h 794 1405 1014 529Approach Delay, s/veh 67.3 31.8 26.5 103.8Approach LOS E C C FTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 61.3 16.0 30.7 32.0 9.6 37.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.6Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 12.5 34.4 44.4 16.5 20.4Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 24.2 14.5 24.0 22.9 6.7 8.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.7 0.0 2.1 4.3 0.0 0.5Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 48.1HCM 6th LOS D HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: El Camino Real & San Carlos Avenue 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 4Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 343 178 135 856 806 399Future Volume (vph) 343 178 135 856 806 399Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1493 1770 3539 3539 1536Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1493 1770 3539 3539 1536Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 365 189 144 911 857 424RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 81 0 0 0 154Lane Group Flow (vph) 365 108 144 911 857 270Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 32 12Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA PermProtected Phases 8 1 6 2Permitted Phases 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 22.1 22.1 15.4 79.7 60.8 60.8Effective Green, g (s) 22.1 22.1 15.4 79.7 60.8 60.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.61 0.47 0.47Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 583 253 209 2169 1655 718v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 c0.08 0.26 c0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.18v/c Ratio 0.63 0.43 0.69 0.42 0.52 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 50.1 48.3 55.0 13.1 24.3 22.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.68 1.18 1.58Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.4 8.1 0.6 1.1 1.4Delay (s) 51.6 48.7 72.8 9.5 29.6 36.7Level of Service D D E A C DApproach Delay (s) 50.6 18.2 32.0Approach LOS D B CIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 30.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service CHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.7% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: El Camino Real & Brittan Avenue 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 5Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 88 321 46 239 337 161 71 658 62 211 681 69Future Volume (veh/h) 88 321 46 239 337 161 71 658 62 211 681 69Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 92 334 33 249 351 138 74 685 45 220 709 57Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 115 438 45 363 553 402 94 1361 606 272 1968 157Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.16 0.82 0.82Sat Flow, veh/h 700 2674 275 1416 2160 1570 1781 3554 1581 3456 4812 384Grp Volume(v), veh/h 241 0 218 316 284 138 74 685 45 220 500 266Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1835 0 1813 1800 1777 1570 1781 1777 1581 1728 1702 1792Q Serve(g_s), s 16.5 0.0 14.8 20.6 18.4 9.3 5.3 19.2 2.3 8.0 4.9 5.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.5 0.0 14.8 20.6 18.4 9.3 5.3 19.2 2.3 8.0 4.9 5.0Prop In Lane 0.38 0.15 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 300 0 297 461 455 402 94 1361 606 272 1392 733V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.00 0.73 0.69 0.62 0.34 0.79 0.50 0.07 0.81 0.36 0.36Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 449 0 444 461 455 402 164 1361 606 478 1392 733HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.93 0.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.3 0.0 51.7 43.6 42.8 39.4 60.9 30.7 25.5 53.8 7.4 7.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.8 0.0 2.4 7.5 5.9 2.2 4.4 1.1 0.2 2.2 0.7 1.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.0 0.0 7.0 10.2 8.8 3.9 2.5 8.3 0.9 3.3 1.6 1.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.2 0.0 54.1 51.2 48.7 41.6 65.3 31.7 25.7 56.0 8.2 8.8LnGrp LOS E A D D D D E C C E A AApproach Vol, veh/h 459 738 804 986Approach Delay, s/veh 55.7 48.4 34.5 19.0Approach LOS E D C BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.9 57.7 37.0 13.2 54.3 25.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.7 3.0 4.5 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 37.5 33.3 18.0 31.5 31.8Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.3 7.0 22.6 10.0 21.2 18.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.7 4.2 0.2 4.4 1.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.1HCM 6th LOS D HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary6: Old Country Rd & Brittan Avenue 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 26 102 139 59 202 20 143 353 53 12 540 26Future Volume (veh/h) 26 102 139 59 202 20 143 353 53 12 540 26Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 107 146 62 213 21 151 372 56 13 568 27Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 79 331 179 415 1521 844 55 405 61 82 479 397Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26Sat Flow, veh/h 693 2920 1578 774 2835 1573 843 1581 238 960 1870 1550Grp Volume(v), veh/h 72 62 146 147 128 21 151 0 428 13 568 27Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1836 1777 1578 1832 1777 1573 843 0 1819 960 1870 1550Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 4.4 11.9 5.2 4.7 0.8 0.0 0.0 29.8 1.7 33.3 1.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 4.4 11.9 5.2 4.7 0.8 33.3 0.0 29.8 31.5 33.3 1.7Prop In Lane 0.38 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 208 202 179 983 953 844 55 0 466 82 479 397V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.31 0.82 0.15 0.13 0.02 2.73 0.00 0.92 0.16 1.19 0.07Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 860 832 739 983 953 844 55 0 466 82 479 397HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.85 0.85 0.85Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 57.8 57.6 61.2 15.2 15.1 14.2 65.0 0.0 47.0 62.3 48.4 36.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.0 2.7 23.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 824.7 0.0 25.5 3.5 100.5 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 2.2 6.3 2.3 2.0 0.3 14.5 0.0 16.6 0.5 28.7 0.7Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.9 60.3 84.7 15.4 15.2 14.2 889.7 0.0 72.5 65.9 148.8 36.9LnGrp LOS E E F B B B F A E E F DApproach Vol, veh/h 280 296 579 608Approach Delay, s/veh 73.2 15.2 285.6 142.1Approach LOS E B F FTimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 73.7 37.4 18.9 37.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.1 4.1 * 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.0 32.9 60.9 * 33Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.2 35.3 13.9 35.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 0.0 0.7 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 157.0HCM 6th LOS FNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
7: Industrial Rd & Brittan Avenue 11/01/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 7Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 133 275 41 166 293 20 239 633 105 155 181 158Future Volume (vph) 133 275 41 166 293 20 239 633 105 155 181 158Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93Flt Protected 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3434 3455 1770 3539 1541 1770 3256Flt Permitted 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3434 3455 1770 3539 1541 1770 3256Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 139 286 43 173 305 21 249 659 109 161 189 165RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 77 0 119 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 462 0 0 497 0 249 659 32 161 235 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1 4 4Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 9 4Turn Type Split NA Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NAProtected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 22.2 23.1 21.1 30.7 30.7 14.8 24.4Effective Green, g (s) 22.2 23.1 21.1 30.7 30.7 14.8 24.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.28 0.28 0.14 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 698 731 342 995 433 240 728v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 c0.14 c0.14 c0.19 c0.09 0.07v/s Ratio Perm 0.02v/c Ratio 0.66 0.68 0.73 0.66 0.07 0.67 0.32Uniform Delay, d1 40.0 39.6 41.3 34.6 28.8 44.8 35.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 2.8 8.0 2.6 0.2 7.8 0.7Delay (s) 42.6 42.3 49.3 37.2 29.0 52.6 36.2Level of Service D D D D C D DApproach Delay (s) 42.6 42.3 39.3 41.3Approach LOS D D D DIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 41.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67Actuated Cycle Length (s) 109.1 Sum of lost time (s) 18.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary8: El Camino Real & Howard Ave 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 8Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 55 162 47 282 171 124 34 710 205 64 909 47Future Volume (veh/h) 55 162 47 282 171 124 34 710 205 64 909 47Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000010000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 57 167 28 291 176 89 35 732 39 66 937 43Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 196 573 101 335 529 444 44 1029 448 546 2931 134Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.02 0.29 0.29 0.31 0.59 0.59Sat Flow, veh/h 505 2026 357 1185 1870 1568 1781 3554 1547 1781 5000 229Grp Volume(v), veh/h 124 0 128 291 176 89 35 732 39 66 637 343Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1252 0 1636 1185 1870 1568 1781 1777 1547 1781 1702 1825Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 6.0 22.0 7.4 4.3 1.9 18.3 1.8 2.6 9.4 9.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.3 0.0 6.0 28.0 7.4 4.3 1.9 18.3 1.8 2.6 9.4 9.5Prop In Lane 0.46 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.13Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 407 0 463 335 529 444 44 1029 448 546 1995 1070V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.00 0.28 0.87 0.33 0.20 0.79 0.71 0.09 0.12 0.32 0.32Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 407 0 463 335 529 444 180 1920 836 547 1995 1070HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.7 0.0 27.6 39.6 28.1 27.0 48.0 31.5 25.6 24.7 10.4 10.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 0.0 1.5 21.4 1.4 0.8 10.8 4.2 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.7 0.0 2.5 9.1 3.5 1.7 1.0 8.2 0.7 1.1 3.3 3.7Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.6 0.0 29.1 61.0 29.5 27.8 58.8 35.7 26.0 24.8 10.8 11.2LnGrp LOS C A C E C C E D C C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 252 556 806 1046Approach Delay, s/veh 30.3 45.7 36.2 11.8Approach LOS C D D BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.5 62.5 31.0 34.9 33.1 31.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 * 4.5 3.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 50.5 28.0 7.0 * 54 28.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 11.5 13.3 4.6 20.3 30.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 11.2 1.7 0.0 8.2 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.1HCM 6th LOS CNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
9: Old Country Rd & Howard Ave 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 9Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 19 88 103 104 99 16 198 205 55 11 354 13Future Volume (veh/h) 19 88 103 104 99 16 198 205 55 11 354 13Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 100 117 118 112 18 225 233 62 12 402 15Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 919 965 795 170 176 29 201 560 457 284 560 465Arrive On Green 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.60 0.60 0.60Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1542 1628 1686 274 983 1870 1527 1145 1870 1555Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 100 117 130 0 118 225 233 62 12 402 15Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1542 1789 0 1798 983 1870 1527 1145 1870 1555Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 3.6 5.2 9.1 0.0 8.2 19.2 13.0 3.9 0.8 19.7 0.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 3.6 5.2 9.1 0.0 8.2 38.9 13.0 3.9 13.8 19.7 0.5Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 919 965 795 186 0 187 201 560 457 284 560 465V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.10 0.15 0.70 0.00 0.63 1.12 0.42 0.14 0.04 0.72 0.03Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 919 965 795 617 0 620 201 560 457 284 560 465HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.4 16.1 16.5 56.2 0.0 55.8 58.0 36.5 33.3 25.0 22.2 18.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.4 1.7 0.0 1.3 99.8 2.3 0.6 0.2 6.7 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.6 1.9 4.2 0.0 3.8 12.2 6.3 1.5 0.2 6.9 0.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.5 16.3 16.9 58.0 0.0 57.1 157.8 38.7 33.9 25.3 28.9 18.5LnGrp LOS B B B E A E F DCCCBApproach Vol, veh/h 239 248 520 429Approach Delay, s/veh 16.5 57.6 89.7 28.5Approach LOS B E F CTimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 70.3 43.0 16.7 43.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.2 4.1 3.2 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.8 38.9 44.8 38.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.2 21.7 11.1 40.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 1.4 1.0 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 53.7HCM 6th LOS D HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary10: Club Dr/Dartmouth Ave & San Carlos Ave 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 10Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 47 441 113 22 530 44 90 17 17 47 30 51Future Volume (veh/h) 47 441 113 22 530 44 90 17 17 47 30 51Initial Q (Qb), veh 000010010010Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 51 474 120 24 570 42 97 18 13 51 32 8Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 113 582 147 66 666 14 168 163 237 122 197 230Arrive On Green 0.07 0.44 0.44 0.04 0.41 0.41 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1430 362 1781 1717 127 1514 281 1519 1115 700 1485Grp Volume(v), veh/h 51 0 594 24 0 612 115 0 13 83 0 8Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1792 1781 0 1844 1795 0 1519 1815 0 1485Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 14.7 0.7 0.0 15.5 3.2 0.0 0.4 2.2 0.0 0.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 0.0 14.7 0.7 0.0 15.5 3.2 0.0 0.4 2.2 0.0 0.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.07 0.84 1.00 0.61 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 113 0 730 66 0 614 205 0 237 204 0 230V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.00 0.81 0.36 0.00 1.00 0.56 0.00 0.05 0.41 0.00 0.03Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 506 0 1192 506 0 1227 850 0 720 860 0 704HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.3 0.0 19.8 33.4 0.0 35.6 22.4 0.0 24.5 22.1 0.0 24.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 0.0 2.3 3.3 0.0 16.0 2.4 0.0 0.1 1.3 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 8.6 0.5 0.0 19.0 1.6 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.1 0.0 22.0 36.7 0.0 55.8 25.2 0.0 24.6 23.7 0.0 24.5LnGrp LOS D A C D A E C A C C A CApproach Vol, veh/h 645 636 128 91Approach Delay, s/veh 23.1 55.1 25.2 23.7Approach LOS C E C CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.6 28.0 9.6 7.2 26.4 9.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.7 3.5 4.9 3.7Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 35.1 25.0 15.0 35.1 25.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 16.7 4.2 3.4 17.5 5.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.0 0.4 0.1 4.0 0.6Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.9HCM 6th LOS D HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Alameda de las Pulgas & San Carlos Ave 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 11 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 409 246 287 523 249 272Future Volume (veh/h) 409 246 287 523 249 272Initial Q (Qb), veh 501300Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 435 149 305 556 265 261Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 646 527 398 1196 366 682Arrive On Green 0.34 0.34 0.22 0.64 0.21 0.21Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1533 1781 1870 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 435 149 305 556 265 261Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1533 1781 1870 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 10.8 3.8 8.7 8.3 7.5 6.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.8 3.8 8.7 8.3 7.5 6.1Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 646 527 398 1196 366 682V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.28 0.77 0.46 0.72 0.38Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1378 1130 989 1378 983 1227HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.2 13.2 20.0 5.2 20.6 10.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.7 0.4 4.4 0.4 2.7 0.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.5 1.3 4.0 2.7 3.2 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.3 13.6 24.5 5.6 23.3 11.1LnGrp LOS B B C A C BApproach Vol, veh/h 584 861 526Approach Delay, s/veh 17.8 12.3 17.3Approach LOS B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 22.7 15.4 38.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 * 4.2 * 4.2 * 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 40 * 30 * 40Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 12.8 9.5 10.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 5.3 1.7 6.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.3HCM 6th LOS BNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary12: Alameda de las Pulgas & Brittan Avenue 11/11/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Existing PM Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 12Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 92 211 38 135 260 129 49 327 90 82 306 97Future Volume (veh/h) 92 211 38 135 260 129 49 327 90 82 306 97Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000060000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 95 218 5 139 268 108 51 337 71 85 315 78Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 116 266 327 456 322 130 73 423 79 109 428 106Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.27 0.27 0.06 0.29 0.29Sat Flow, veh/h 559 1283 1574 1781 1256 506 1781 1488 314 1781 1435 355Grp Volume(v), veh/h 313 0 5 139 0 376 51 0 408 85 0 393Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1842 0 1574 1781 0 1763 1781 0 1802 1781 0 1791Q Serve(g_s), s 13.8 0.0 0.2 5.4 0.0 17.1 2.4 0.0 18.2 4.0 0.0 17.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.8 0.0 0.2 5.4 0.0 17.1 2.4 0.0 18.2 4.0 0.0 17.0Prop In Lane 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.20Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 383 0 327 456 0 451 73 0 502 109 0 534V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.00 0.02 0.30 0.00 0.83 0.70 0.00 0.81 0.78 0.00 0.74Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 883 0 754 853 0 844 627 0 954 627 0 948HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.6 0.0 27.9 26.6 0.0 31.2 42.0 0.0 30.3 41.0 0.0 27.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.1 4.5 0.0 3.2 4.4 0.0 2.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.7 0.0 0.1 2.4 0.0 7.9 1.2 0.0 9.9 1.9 0.0 7.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.9 0.0 28.0 27.0 0.0 35.3 46.5 0.0 39.1 45.5 0.0 29.8LnGrp LOS D A C C A D D A D D A CApproach Vol, veh/h 318 515 459 478Approach Delay, s/veh 37.7 33.1 39.9 32.5Approach LOS D C D CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 27.8 22.0 7.5 29.5 26.1Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 * 4.2 4.0 4.9 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 45.1 * 41 30.0 45.1 40.8Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 20.2 15.8 4.4 19.0 19.1Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 1.9 0.0 2.6 2.8Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.5HCM 6th LOS DNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

C Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 2025
Appendix C
Intersection Level of Service Calculations (Cumulative 2045 General Plan Conditions)

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: El Camino Real & Holly Street 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 22 559 85 421 259 131 55 586 501 168 561 37Future Volume (veh/h) 22 559 85 421 259 131 55 586 501 168 561 37Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000004000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 582 87 439 270 116 57 610 417 175 584 36Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 25 651 103 633 342 283 201 891 691 356 768 47Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.23 0.23Sat Flow, veh/h 116 3042 479 3456 1870 1546 1781 3554 2756 3456 3400 209Grp Volume(v), veh/h 370 0 322 439 270 116 57 610 417 175 305 315Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1865 0 1773 1728 1870 1546 1781 1777 1378 1728 1777 1833Q Serve(g_s), s 12.7 0.0 11.3 7.7 9.0 4.3 1.9 10.1 8.7 3.1 10.4 10.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.7 0.0 11.3 7.7 9.0 4.3 1.9 10.1 8.7 3.1 10.4 10.5Prop In Lane 0.06 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 399 0 379 633 342 283 201 891 691 356 401 414V/C Ratio(X) 0.93 0.00 0.85 0.69 0.79 0.41 0.28 0.68 0.60 0.49 0.76 0.76Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 399 0 379 633 342 283 201 891 691 372 533 550HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.00 0.97 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.72 0.72 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.1 0.0 24.5 24.8 25.3 23.4 26.4 22.0 21.7 27.5 23.5 23.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 26.9 0.0 15.2 4.4 12.2 3.1 0.2 3.1 2.8 0.8 12.7 12.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.3 0.0 6.1 3.4 5.0 1.8 0.8 4.2 3.0 1.2 5.4 5.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.0 0.0 39.8 29.2 37.5 26.5 26.6 25.1 25.1 28.3 36.2 36.0LnGrp LOS D A D C D C C C C C D DApproach Vol, veh/h 692 825 1084 795Approach Delay, s/veh 46.3 31.6 25.2 34.4Approach LOS D C C CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.8 19.2 16.0 10.2 20.8 18.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 * 4.5 4.1 3.5 4.5 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 * 20 11.9 7.0 16.0 13.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 12.5 11.0 5.1 12.1 14.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.5 0.1 2.1 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.2HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary2: Old Country Rd & Holly Street 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 283 763 176 67 606 64 56 153 131 54 310 131Future Volume (veh/h) 283 763 176 67 606 64 56 153 131 54 310 131Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 289 779 180 68 618 65 57 156 134 55 316 134Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 235 675 386 80 759 84 150 237 204 70 362 299Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.19 0.19Sat Flow, veh/h 930 2670 1524 316 3002 331 1781 903 775 1781 1870 1544Grp Volume(v), veh/h 567 501 180 399 0 352 57 0 290 55 316 134Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1824 1777 1524 1855 0 1795 1781 0 1678 1781 1870 1544Q Serve(g_s), s 21.5 21.5 8.5 17.4 0.0 15.5 2.6 0.0 13.1 2.6 13.9 6.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 21.5 21.5 8.5 17.4 0.0 15.5 2.6 0.0 13.1 2.6 13.9 6.5Prop In Lane 0.51 1.00 0.17 0.18 1.00 0.46 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 461 449 386 469 0 454 150 0 441 70 362 299V/C Ratio(X) 1.23 1.12 0.47 0.85 0.00 0.78 0.38 0.00 0.66 0.78 0.87 0.45Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 461 449 386 469 0 454 150 0 441 136 422 349HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.64 0.64 0.64 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.8 31.8 26.9 30.2 0.0 29.5 36.8 0.0 27.9 40.5 33.3 30.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 114.8 70.3 2.6 17.4 0.0 12.2 0.1 0.0 0.7 6.9 24.0 4.8Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 23.9 17.8 3.3 9.9 0.0 8.1 1.1 0.0 5.2 1.3 8.6 2.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 146.5 102.0 29.5 47.6 0.0 41.7 36.9 0.0 28.6 47.4 57.2 35.1LnGrp LOS F F C D A D D A C D E DApproach Vol, veh/h 1248 751 347 505Approach Delay, s/veh 111.8 44.8 30.0 50.3Approach LOS F D C DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 27.4 25.6 12.2 21.6 25.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.1 4.1 5.1 * 5.1 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 19.2 21.5 6.5 * 19 21.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.6 15.1 19.4 4.6 15.9 23.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 73.3HCM 6th LOS ENotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Industrial Rd & Holly St 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 3Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 202 847 25 482 633 464 21 716 372 296 341 79Future Volume (veh/h) 202 847 25 482 633 464 21 716 372 296 341 79Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 202 847 25 482 633 464 21 716 372 296 341 79Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 217 982 30 768 790 352 43 643 1563 269 1138 260Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.02 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.40 0.40Sat Flow, veh/h 949 4290 129 3456 3554 1585 1781 1870 2744 3456 2864 654Grp Volume(v), veh/h 388 329 357 482 633 464 21 716 372 296 210 210Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1823 1702 1843 1728 1777 1585 1781 1870 1372 1728 1777 1741Q Serve(g_s), s 28.2 25.0 25.0 17.0 22.8 30.0 1.6 46.4 9.2 10.5 10.9 11.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.2 25.0 25.0 17.0 22.8 30.0 1.6 46.4 9.2 10.5 10.9 11.2Prop In Lane 0.52 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.38Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 417 390 422 768 790 352 43 643 1563 269 706 692V/C Ratio(X) 0.93 0.84 0.85 0.63 0.80 1.32 0.49 1.11 0.24 1.10 0.30 0.30Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 417 390 422 768 790 352 92 643 1563 269 706 692HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.0 49.8 49.8 47.5 49.7 52.5 65.0 44.3 14.7 62.3 27.8 27.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 29.6 19.6 18.5 1.5 5.8 161.5 3.1 71.0 0.0 84.7 0.1 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 16.4 12.8 13.8 7.5 10.8 27.6 0.7 33.7 4.6 7.7 4.6 4.7Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 80.6 69.4 68.2 48.9 55.4 214.0 68.2 115.3 14.7 147.0 27.9 28.0LnGrp LOS F E E D E F E F B F C CApproach Vol, veh/h 1074 1579 1109 716Approach Delay, s/veh 73.0 100.1 80.7 77.2Approach LOS E F F ETimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 34.5 14.0 51.0 35.5 6.8 58.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.6Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 10.5 46.4 30.9 7.0 49.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 32.0 12.5 48.4 30.2 3.6 13.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.6Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 85.1HCM 6th LOS F HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: El Camino Real & San Carlos Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 4Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 735 250 439 573 665 326Future Volume (vph) 735 250 439 573 665 326Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1505 1770 3539 3539 1556Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1505 1770 3539 3539 1556Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 782 266 467 610 707 347RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 67 0 0 0 261Lane Group Flow (vph) 782 199 467 610 707 86Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 38 5Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA PermProtected Phases 8 1 6 2Permitted Phases 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 22.4 22.4 23.7 49.6 22.4 22.4Effective Green, g (s) 22.4 22.4 23.7 49.6 22.4 22.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.55 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 854 374 466 1950 880 387v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 c0.26 0.17 c0.20v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.06v/c Ratio 0.92 0.53 1.00 0.31 0.80 0.22Uniform Delay, d1 32.9 29.3 33.1 11.0 31.7 26.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 14.0 0.7 42.2 0.4 7.7 1.3Delay (s) 46.9 30.0 75.4 11.4 39.4 28.2Level of Service D C E B D CApproach Delay (s) 42.6 39.1 35.7Approach LOS D D DIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 39.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.9% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: El Camino Real & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 5Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 50 402 41 188 255 92 58 661 230 262 641 45Future Volume (veh/h) 50 402 41 188 255 92 58 661 230 262 641 45Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 52 419 41 196 266 60 60 689 218 273 668 37Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 64 537 55 318 317 282 75 983 438 377 1700 94Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.34 0.34Sat Flow, veh/h 356 2994 307 1781 1777 1582 1781 3554 1585 3456 4950 273Grp Volume(v), veh/h 271 0 241 196 266 60 60 689 218 273 458 247Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1853 0 1804 1781 1777 1582 1781 1777 1585 1728 1702 1819Q Serve(g_s), s 8.4 0.0 7.6 6.1 8.7 1.9 2.0 10.4 6.9 4.6 6.1 6.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.4 0.0 7.6 6.1 8.7 1.9 2.0 10.4 6.9 4.6 6.1 6.2Prop In Lane 0.19 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 332 0 324 318 317 282 75 983 438 377 1169 624V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.75 0.62 0.84 0.21 0.80 0.70 0.50 0.72 0.39 0.40Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 352 0 343 318 317 282 178 983 438 403 1169 624HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.92 0.00 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.7 0.0 23.3 22.8 23.8 21.1 28.5 19.5 18.2 25.9 14.9 15.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.8 0.0 7.1 7.7 20.4 1.5 5.7 3.4 3.2 4.9 1.0 1.9Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.5 0.0 3.6 3.1 5.2 0.8 0.9 4.3 2.7 2.0 2.2 2.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.4 0.0 30.4 30.4 44.2 22.6 34.2 22.9 21.4 30.8 15.9 16.8LnGrp LOS D A C C D C C C C C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 512 522 967 978Approach Delay, s/veh 33.1 36.6 23.3 20.3Approach LOS C D C CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.5 25.1 14.4 9.5 21.1 15.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.7 3.0 4.5 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 16.5 10.7 7.0 15.5 11.4Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.0 8.2 10.7 6.6 12.4 10.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.3Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.3HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary6: Old Country Rd & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 83 162 114 51 183 34 196 908 72 47 465 27Future Volume (veh/h) 83 162 114 51 183 34 196 908 72 47 465 27Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 89 174 123 55 197 37 211 976 77 51 500 29Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 209 441 279 219 837 463 390 921 73 65 1008 841Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54Sat Flow, veh/h 1154 2435 1542 749 2860 1582 874 1708 135 536 1870 1559Grp Volume(v), veh/h 140 123 123 135 117 37 211 0 1053 51 500 29Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1813 1777 1542 1833 1777 1582 874 0 1843 536 1870 1559Q Serve(g_s), s 7.5 6.7 7.8 6.2 5.5 1.9 22.0 0.0 59.3 0.0 18.5 1.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.5 6.7 7.8 6.2 5.5 1.9 40.5 0.0 59.3 59.3 18.5 1.0Prop In Lane 0.64 1.00 0.41 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 328 321 279 537 520 463 390 0 993 65 1008 841V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.38 0.44 0.25 0.23 0.08 0.54 0.00 1.06 0.78 0.50 0.03Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 328 321 279 537 520 463 390 0 993 65 1008 841HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.85 0.00 0.85 0.78 0.78 0.78Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.0 39.7 40.1 29.7 29.5 28.2 28.7 0.0 25.4 55.0 15.9 11.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 2.4 3.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 4.5 0.0 43.8 50.3 1.4 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.6 3.1 3.2 2.7 2.4 0.7 5.0 0.0 35.8 2.3 7.9 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.8 42.0 43.6 29.8 29.6 28.2 33.2 0.0 69.1 105.3 17.3 12.0LnGrp LOS D D D C C C C A F F B BApproach Vol, veh/h 386 289 1264 580Approach Delay, s/veh 42.8 29.5 63.1 24.8Approach LOS D C E CTimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 36.6 63.4 24.0 63.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.1 4.1 * 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 58.9 19.9 * 59Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.2 61.3 9.8 61.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.0 0.9 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 47.3HCM 6th LOS DNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
7: Industrial Rd & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 7Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 610 402 32 257 340 336 73 494 75 70 169 72Future Volume (vph) 610 402 32 257 340 336 73 494 75 70 169 72Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3423 3303 1770 3539 1544 1770 3357Flt Permitted 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3423 3303 1770 3539 1544 1770 3357Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Adj. Flow (vph) 670 442 35 282 374 369 80 543 82 77 186 79RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 65 0 0 0 67 0 40 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1145 0 0 960 0 80 543 15 77 225 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 52Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 26Turn Type Split NA Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NAProtected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 39.4 34.4 6.8 21.5 21.5 6.4 21.1Effective Green, g (s) 39.4 34.4 6.8 21.5 21.5 6.4 21.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.29 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.18Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1123 946 100 634 276 94 590v/s Ratio Prot c0.33 c0.29 0.05 c0.15 c0.04 0.07v/s Ratio Perm 0.01v/c Ratio 1.15dl 1.01 0.80 0.86 0.05 0.82 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 40.3 42.8 55.9 47.8 40.8 56.2 43.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 31.9 33.0 36.8 12.5 0.2 42.0 1.2Delay (s) 72.2 75.8 92.7 60.2 41.0 98.2 44.9Level of Service E E F E D F DApproach Delay (s) 72.2 75.8 61.7 56.9Approach LOS E E E EIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 69.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service EHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.3% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary8: El Camino Real & Howard Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 8Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 79 277 46 160 67 75 119 751 272 69 771 29Future Volume (veh/h) 79 277 46 160 67 75 119 751 272 69 771 29Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 82 289 45 167 70 47 124 782 73 72 803 12Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 250 817 126 362 648 548 157 1105 483 325 2202 33Arrive On Green 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.42 0.42Sat Flow, veh/h 530 2356 365 1044 1870 1581 1781 3554 1551 1781 5182 77Grp Volume(v), veh/h 215 0 201 167 70 47 124 782 73 72 527 288Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1622 0 1628 1044 1870 1581 1781 1777 1551 1781 1702 1855Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 0.0 6.9 10.6 1.9 1.5 5.1 14.6 2.6 2.6 7.9 7.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 0.0 6.9 17.5 1.9 1.5 5.1 14.6 2.6 2.6 7.9 7.9Prop In Lane 0.38 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 628 0 564 362 648 548 157 1105 483 325 1446 788V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.00 0.36 0.46 0.11 0.09 0.79 0.71 0.15 0.22 0.36 0.37Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 628 0 564 362 648 548 280 1493 652 325 1446 788HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.2 0.0 18.3 24.8 16.6 16.5 33.5 22.8 18.7 26.1 14.7 14.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 0.0 1.8 3.8 0.3 0.3 3.3 3.8 0.7 0.1 0.6 1.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.9 0.0 2.7 2.9 0.8 0.6 2.3 6.2 0.9 1.1 2.9 3.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.7 0.0 20.0 28.6 16.9 16.8 36.8 26.6 19.3 26.2 15.3 15.9LnGrp LOS B A C C B B D C B C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 416 284 979 887Approach Delay, s/veh 19.8 23.8 27.4 16.4Approach LOS B C C BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.6 36.4 29.0 18.2 27.8 29.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 * 4.5 3.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.8 26.7 26.0 7.0 * 32 26.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.1 9.9 9.0 4.6 16.6 19.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 6.4 3.2 0.0 6.4 0.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.0HCM 6th LOS CNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
9: Old Country Rd & Howard Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 9Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 60 73 64 71 72 54 232 608 127 173 186 11Future Volume (veh/h) 60 73 64 71 72 54 232 608 127 173 186 11Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 63 77 67 75 76 57 244 640 134 182 196 12Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 581 610 498 112 116 89 538 850 696 199 850 708Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1528 1224 1266 967 1174 1870 1532 696 1870 1558Grp Volume(v), veh/h 63 77 67 111 0 97 244 640 134 182 196 12Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1528 1809 0 1649 1174 1870 1532 696 1870 1558Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 2.6 2.8 5.3 0.0 5.1 14.4 25.5 4.7 15.4 5.7 0.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 2.6 2.8 5.3 0.0 5.1 20.1 25.5 4.7 40.9 5.7 0.4Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 581 610 498 166 0 151 538 850 696 199 850 708V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.67 0.00 0.64 0.45 0.75 0.19 0.92 0.23 0.02Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 581 610 498 378 0 344 538 850 696 199 850 708HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 0.88Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.2 21.3 21.4 39.6 0.0 39.5 21.1 20.4 14.7 40.0 15.0 13.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.4 0.5 1.7 0.0 1.7 2.7 6.1 0.6 41.3 0.6 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 1.2 1.1 2.4 0.0 2.1 4.1 11.7 1.7 6.3 2.4 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.5 21.7 21.9 41.3 0.0 41.2 23.8 26.5 15.3 81.3 15.5 13.5LnGrp LOS C C C D A D C C B F B BApproach Vol, veh/h 207 208 1018 390Approach Delay, s/veh 21.7 41.2 24.4 46.2Approach LOS C D C DTimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.1 45.0 11.9 45.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.1 3.7 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.8 40.9 18.8 40.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 42.9 7.3 27.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.6 3.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.7HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary10: Club Dr/Dartmouth Ave & San Carlos Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 10Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 109 271 170 40 501 103 192 76 43 114 61 156Future Volume (veh/h) 109 271 170 40 501 103 192 76 43 114 61 156Initial Q (Qb), veh 010070011042Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.49Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 124 308 184 45 569 100 218 86 25 130 69 53Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 162 368 45 103 400 22 259 209 160 221 229 156Arrive On Green 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.27 0.27 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1063 635 1781 1459 256 1295 511 777 1183 628 771Grp Volume(v), veh/h 124 0 492 45 0 669 304 0 25 199 0 53Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1698 1781 0 1716 1806 0 777 1811 0 771Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 0.0 19.3 1.7 0.0 18.6 11.0 0.0 1.8 6.8 0.0 4.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.6 0.0 19.3 1.7 0.0 18.6 11.0 0.0 1.8 6.8 0.0 4.0Prop In Lane 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.15 0.72 1.00 0.65 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 162 0 488 103 0 425 372 0 160 364 0 156V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 1.01 0.44 0.00 1.57 0.82 0.00 0.16 0.55 0.00 0.34Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 209 0 521 209 0 468 498 0 214 499 0 213HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.0 0.0 28.9 32.8 0.0 30.2 26.1 0.0 22.5 25.0 0.0 23.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.8 0.0 41.0 2.9 0.0 268.8 7.8 0.0 0.5 1.3 0.0 1.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 59.2 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.9 0.0 1.8%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.6 0.0 15.3 0.8 0.0 46.5 5.5 0.0 0.4 3.5 0.0 1.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.8 0.0 77.3 35.7 0.0 358.2 34.1 0.0 23.3 28.2 0.0 26.9LnGrp LOS D A F D A F C A C C A CApproach Vol, veh/h 616 714 329 252Approach Delay, s/veh 70.5 337.9 33.3 27.9Approach LOS E F C CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.5 25.8 17.2 9.8 23.5 17.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.7 3.5 4.9 3.7Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 18.6 18.8 8.0 18.6 18.8Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 21.3 8.8 6.6 20.6 13.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 158.4HCM 6th LOS F HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Alameda de las Pulgas & San Carlos Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 11 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 573 242 174 466 248 333Future Volume (veh/h) 573 242 174 466 248 333Initial Q (Qb), veh 500610Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 610 150 185 496 264 317Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 768 638 234 1156 409 584Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.13 0.62 0.23 0.23Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1540 1781 1870 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 610 150 185 496 264 317Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1540 1781 1870 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 15.7 3.5 5.6 7.6 7.5 8.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.7 3.5 5.6 7.6 7.5 8.9Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 768 638 234 1156 409 584V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.24 0.79 0.43 0.65 0.54Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1030 848 321 1501 866 979HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.0 11.0 24.3 6.0 19.5 14.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.8 0.3 10.9 0.4 1.7 0.8Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.2 1.2 3.0 3.0 3.1 8.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.3 11.3 35.1 6.7 21.4 15.0LnGrp LOS C B D A C BApproach Vol, veh/h 760 681 581Approach Delay, s/veh 19.3 14.4 17.9Approach LOS B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 27.4 16.9 38.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 * 4.2 * 4.2 * 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 * 31 * 27 * 45Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.6 17.7 10.9 9.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 5.3 1.8 5.5Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.3HCM 6th LOS BNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary12: Alameda de las Pulgas & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 12Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 185 224 134 163 231 72 53 450 84 109 380 117Future Volume (veh/h) 185 224 134 163 231 72 53 450 84 109 380 117Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000010000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 193 233 98 170 241 58 55 469 63 114 396 85Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 200 242 372 339 277 67 73 497 61 135 504 108Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.04 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.34 0.34Sat Flow, veh/h 829 1000 1536 1781 1456 350 1781 1606 216 1781 1482 318Grp Volume(v), veh/h 426 0 98 170 0 299 55 0 532 114 0 481Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1829 0 1536 1781 0 1806 1781 0 1821 1781 0 1800Q Serve(g_s), s 21.3 0.0 4.8 7.9 0.0 14.9 2.8 0.0 26.5 5.9 0.0 22.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 21.3 0.0 4.8 7.9 0.0 14.9 2.8 0.0 26.5 5.9 0.0 22.3Prop In Lane 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.18Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 442 0 372 339 0 344 73 0 558 135 0 612V/C Ratio(X) 0.96 0.00 0.26 0.50 0.00 0.87 0.76 0.00 0.95 0.85 0.00 0.79Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 442 0 372 385 0 390 106 0 556 135 0 612HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.7 0.0 28.4 33.6 0.0 36.4 44.0 0.0 31.6 42.3 0.0 27.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 33.3 0.0 0.4 1.1 0.0 17.1 8.3 0.0 27.1 35.2 0.0 6.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 13.3 0.0 1.8 3.5 0.0 8.1 1.4 0.0 15.6 3.9 0.0 10.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.1 0.0 28.8 34.7 0.0 53.5 52.3 0.0 59.2 77.5 0.0 34.2LnGrp LOS E A C C A D D A E E A CApproach Vol, veh/h 524 469 587 595Approach Delay, s/veh 60.7 46.7 58.5 42.5Approach LOS E D E DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.0 33.2 26.6 7.8 36.4 21.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 * 4.2 4.0 4.9 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 28.3 * 22 5.5 29.8 20.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.9 28.5 23.3 4.8 24.3 16.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.7Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 52.1HCM 6th LOS DNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: El Camino Real & Holly Street 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 61 208 42 648 624 242 70 695 390 147 649 70Future Volume (veh/h) 61 208 42 648 624 242 70 695 390 147 649 70Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 63 214 34 668 643 208 72 716 266 152 669 65Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 85 301 50 1103 597 499 339 1305 1016 202 742 72Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.19 0.37 0.37 0.06 0.23 0.23Sat Flow, veh/h 705 2501 413 3456 1870 1563 1781 3554 2767 3456 3272 318Grp Volume(v), veh/h 164 0 147 668 643 208 72 716 266 152 363 371Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1835 0 1783 1728 1870 1563 1781 1777 1383 1728 1777 1813Q Serve(g_s), s 10.4 0.0 9.5 19.6 38.3 12.5 4.1 19.2 8.1 5.2 23.8 23.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.4 0.0 9.5 19.6 38.3 12.5 4.1 19.2 8.1 5.2 23.8 23.9Prop In Lane 0.38 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.18Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 221 0 214 1103 597 499 339 1305 1016 202 403 411V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.00 0.69 0.61 1.08 0.42 0.21 0.55 0.26 0.75 0.90 0.90Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 474 0 461 1103 597 499 339 1305 1016 202 429 438HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.0 0.0 50.6 34.5 40.8 32.1 41.0 30.1 26.6 55.7 45.1 45.1Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 1.4 0.5 42.0 0.5 0.1 1.4 0.5 14.2 25.8 25.6Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.9 0.0 4.4 8.4 24.5 4.9 1.8 8.3 2.7 2.6 13.2 13.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.8 0.0 52.0 35.0 82.9 32.6 41.1 31.5 27.1 69.9 70.9 70.7LnGrp LOS D A D D F C D C C E E EApproach Vol, veh/h 311 1519 1054 886Approach Delay, s/veh 52.5 54.9 31.1 70.6Approach LOS D D C ETimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.4 31.7 42.4 10.5 48.6 18.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 * 4.5 4.1 3.5 4.5 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 * 29 38.3 7.0 27.5 31.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.1 25.9 40.3 7.2 21.2 12.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 51.8HCM 6th LOS DNotesUser approved ignoring U-Turning movement.* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary2: Old Country Rd & Holly Street 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 87 582 61 35 1081 32 101 376 201 128 294 293Future Volume (veh/h) 87 582 61 35 1081 32 101 376 201 128 294 293Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 91 606 64 36 1126 33 105 392 209 133 306 305Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 86 603 288 33 1075 33 292 357 190 138 404 334Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.16 0.32 0.32 0.08 0.22 0.22Sat Flow, veh/h 452 3172 1515 107 3497 108 1781 1126 601 1781 1870 1546Grp Volume(v), veh/h 372 325 64 629 0 566 105 0 601 133 306 305Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1848 1777 1515 1865 0 1846 1781 0 1727 1781 1870 1546Q Serve(g_s), s 28.5 27.2 5.4 46.1 0.0 46.0 7.9 0.0 47.5 11.2 23.0 28.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.5 27.2 5.4 46.1 0.0 46.0 7.9 0.0 47.5 11.2 23.0 28.9Prop In Lane 0.24 1.00 0.06 0.06 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 351 338 288 573 0 567 292 0 547 138 404 334V/C Ratio(X) 1.06 0.96 0.22 1.10 0.00 1.00 0.36 0.00 1.10 0.97 0.76 0.91Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 351 338 288 573 0 567 292 0 547 138 532 440HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.86 0.86 0.86 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.88 0.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 60.8 60.2 51.4 52.0 0.0 51.9 55.7 0.0 51.3 69.0 55.1 57.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 61.0 37.1 1.5 66.7 0.0 37.4 0.2 0.0 66.2 65.6 12.5 31.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 19.4 15.8 2.2 32.3 0.0 27.3 3.6 0.0 30.5 7.6 12.3 14.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 121.8 97.3 52.9 118.6 0.0 89.3 55.9 0.0 117.4 134.6 67.6 89.0LnGrp LOS F F D F A F E A F F E FApproach Vol, veh/h 761 1195 706 744Approach Delay, s/veh 105.5 104.7 108.3 88.4Approach LOS F F F FTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.6 52.6 50.2 29.7 37.5 32.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.1 4.1 5.1 * 5.1 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.6 47.5 46.1 16.4 * 43 28.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.2 49.5 48.1 9.9 30.9 30.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 102.1HCM 6th LOS FNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Industrial Rd & Holly St 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 3Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 118 730 99 380 790 397 143 537 729 504 823 324Future Volume (veh/h) 118 730 99 380 790 397 143 537 729 504 823 324Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 123 760 103 396 823 414 149 559 759 525 857 338Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 130 857 119 787 809 361 168 547 1437 527 869 341Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.15 0.35 0.35Sat Flow, veh/h 622 4100 570 3456 3554 1585 1781 1870 2741 3456 2480 974Grp Volume(v), veh/h 364 306 317 396 823 414 149 559 759 525 613 582Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1839 1702 1751 1728 1777 1585 1781 1870 1371 1728 1777 1678Q Serve(g_s), s 28.3 25.1 25.3 14.5 33.0 33.0 12.0 42.4 26.6 22.0 49.6 50.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.3 25.1 25.3 14.5 33.0 33.0 12.0 42.4 26.6 22.0 49.6 50.0Prop In Lane 0.34 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.58Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 384 356 366 787 809 361 168 547 1437 527 623 588V/C Ratio(X) 0.95 0.86 0.87 0.50 1.02 1.15 0.89 1.02 0.53 1.00 0.98 0.99Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 384 356 366 787 809 361 168 547 1437 527 623 588HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 56.6 55.3 55.4 48.8 56.0 56.0 64.9 51.3 23.1 61.4 46.7 46.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 34.2 22.8 23.0 2.3 36.0 93.7 37.7 44.2 0.2 38.3 32.0 34.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 16.9 13.1 13.6 6.6 18.8 22.5 7.2 26.3 13.4 12.4 27.1 26.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 90.8 78.1 78.4 51.1 92.0 149.7 102.5 95.5 23.3 99.7 78.7 81.3LnGrp LOS F E E D F F F F C F E FApproach Vol, veh/h 986 1633 1467 1720Approach Delay, s/veh 82.9 96.7 58.8 86.0Approach LOS F F E FTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 37.5 25.6 47.0 34.9 17.2 55.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.6Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 33.0 22.1 42.4 30.3 13.7 50.8Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 35.0 24.0 44.4 30.3 14.0 52.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 81.6HCM 6th LOS F HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: El Camino Real & San Carlos Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 4Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 343 546 203 856 806 701Future Volume (vph) 343 546 203 856 806 701Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1528 1770 3539 3539 1550Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1528 1770 3539 3539 1550Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 365 581 216 911 857 746RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 454 0 0 0 467Lane Group Flow (vph) 365 127 216 911 857 279Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 32 12Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA PermProtected Phases 8 1 6 2Permitted Phases 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 10.3 10.3 10.9 38.7 24.3 24.3Effective Green, g (s) 10.3 10.3 10.9 38.7 24.3 24.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.60 0.37 0.37Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 543 242 296 2107 1323 579v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 c0.12 0.26 c0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.18v/c Ratio 0.67 0.52 0.73 0.43 0.65 0.48Uniform Delay, d1 25.8 25.1 25.7 7.2 16.8 15.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.19 0.86 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 0.9 7.9 0.6 2.5 2.9Delay (s) 28.3 26.0 38.4 6.8 19.3 18.4Level of Service C C D A B BApproach Delay (s) 26.9 12.9 18.9Approach LOS C B BIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 19.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.4% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: El Camino Real & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 5Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 88 321 57 326 422 161 90 658 62 211 704 69Future Volume (veh/h) 88 321 57 326 422 161 90 658 62 211 704 69Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 92 334 44 340 440 138 94 685 45 220 733 57Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 105 399 55 474 473 418 120 946 420 266 1329 103Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.09 0.09Sat Flow, veh/h 681 2595 356 1781 1777 1571 1781 3554 1580 3456 4824 373Grp Volume(v), veh/h 248 0 222 340 440 138 94 685 45 220 516 274Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1836 0 1796 1781 1777 1571 1781 1777 1580 1728 1702 1793Q Serve(g_s), s 8.6 0.0 7.8 11.3 15.7 4.6 3.4 11.4 1.4 4.1 9.4 9.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.6 0.0 7.8 11.3 15.7 4.6 3.4 11.4 1.4 4.1 9.4 9.5Prop In Lane 0.37 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 283 0 276 474 473 418 120 946 420 266 938 494V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.00 0.80 0.72 0.93 0.33 0.78 0.72 0.11 0.83 0.55 0.55Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 283 0 276 474 473 418 137 946 420 266 938 494HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33Upstream Filter(I) 0.93 0.00 0.93 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.9 0.0 26.6 21.6 23.3 19.2 29.8 21.7 18.0 31.2 25.7 25.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.6 0.0 14.3 7.8 24.5 1.8 16.1 4.0 0.4 18.0 2.3 4.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.4 0.0 4.2 5.4 9.3 1.8 1.9 4.8 0.5 2.4 4.3 4.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.6 0.0 40.8 29.4 47.8 21.0 45.9 25.7 18.4 49.3 28.0 30.2LnGrp LOS D A D C D C D C B D C CApproach Vol, veh/h 470 918 824 1010Approach Delay, s/veh 46.0 37.0 27.6 33.2Approach LOS D D C CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.4 22.4 21.0 8.0 21.8 14.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.7 3.0 4.5 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 17.3 17.3 5.0 17.3 10.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.4 11.5 17.7 6.1 13.4 10.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.7HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary6: Old Country Rd & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 33 102 139 59 202 223 143 460 53 12 945 173Future Volume (veh/h) 33 102 139 59 202 223 143 460 53 12 945 173Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 35 107 146 62 213 235 151 484 56 13 995 182Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 91 299 171 129 472 258 179 1047 121 472 1193 995Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Sat Flow, veh/h 845 2760 1578 776 2833 1547 566 1642 190 866 1870 1559Grp Volume(v), veh/h 76 66 146 146 129 235 151 0 540 13 995 182Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1828 1777 1578 1832 1777 1547 566 0 1832 866 1870 1559Q Serve(g_s), s 5.4 4.8 12.7 10.1 9.1 20.9 31.7 0.0 21.2 1.1 57.6 6.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.4 4.8 12.7 10.1 9.1 20.9 89.3 0.0 21.2 22.3 57.6 6.7Prop In Lane 0.46 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 198 192 171 305 296 258 179 0 1168 472 1193 995V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.34 0.85 0.48 0.43 0.91 0.84 0.00 0.46 0.03 0.83 0.18Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 260 253 224 305 296 258 179 0 1168 472 1193 995HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.62 0.62 0.62Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.1 57.8 61.3 52.8 52.4 57.3 56.6 0.0 13.0 18.7 19.6 10.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 2.3 22.2 2.2 1.9 19.3 35.3 0.0 1.3 0.1 4.4 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.7 2.3 6.2 4.9 4.2 9.6 7.2 0.0 8.8 0.2 24.9 2.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.7 60.1 83.5 55.0 54.3 76.7 91.8 0.0 14.3 18.8 24.1 10.6LnGrp LOS E E F D D E F A B B C BApproach Vol, veh/h 288 510 691 1190Approach Delay, s/veh 72.1 64.8 31.3 21.9Approach LOS E E C CTimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.3 93.4 19.3 93.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.1 4.1 * 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 88.9 19.9 * 89Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.9 59.6 14.7 91.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.1 0.4 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 37.9HCM 6th LOS DNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
7: Industrial Rd & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 7Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 211 275 41 166 293 103 239 834 105 319 390 615Future Volume (vph) 211 275 41 166 293 103 239 834 105 319 390 615Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3425 3384 1770 3539 1540 1770 3170Flt Permitted 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3425 3384 1770 3539 1540 1770 3170Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 220 286 43 173 305 107 249 869 109 332 406 641RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 17 0 0 0 83 0 257 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 543 0 0 568 0 249 869 26 332 790 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1 4 4Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 9 4Turn Type Split NA Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NAProtected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 21.5 22.1 16.2 25.9 25.9 19.8 29.5Effective Green, g (s) 21.5 22.1 16.2 25.9 25.9 19.8 29.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.21 0.15 0.24 0.24 0.18 0.27Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 684 695 266 851 370 325 869v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 c0.17 0.14 c0.25 c0.19 0.25v/s Ratio Perm 0.02v/c Ratio 0.79 0.82 0.94 1.02 0.07 1.02 0.91Uniform Delay, d1 40.9 40.8 45.2 40.8 31.6 43.9 37.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 6.7 7.7 38.3 36.3 0.2 55.5 14.4Delay (s) 47.6 48.6 83.5 77.1 31.8 99.4 52.2Level of Service D D F E C F DApproach Delay (s) 47.6 48.6 74.4 63.5Approach LOS D D E EIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 62.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service EHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92Actuated Cycle Length (s) 107.6 Sum of lost time (s) 18.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.0% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary8: El Camino Real & Howard Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 8Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 63 164 152 282 228 124 36 710 205 64 999 92Future Volume (veh/h) 63 164 152 282 228 124 36 710 205 64 999 92Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000010000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 65 169 137 291 235 89 37 732 39 66 1030 90Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 204 496 410 388 673 566 51 1047 456 330 2250 196Arrive On Green 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.03 0.29 0.29 0.19 0.47 0.47Sat Flow, veh/h 388 1377 1139 1071 1870 1572 1781 3554 1547 1781 4774 416Grp Volume(v), veh/h 191 0 180 291 235 89 37 732 39 66 734 386Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1412 0 1493 1071 1870 1572 1781 1777 1547 1781 1702 1787Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 0.0 6.6 20.3 6.9 2.9 1.5 13.7 1.4 2.3 10.9 10.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.3 0.0 6.6 26.9 6.9 2.9 1.5 13.7 1.4 2.3 10.9 10.9Prop In Lane 0.34 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.23Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 573 0 537 388 673 566 51 1047 456 330 1604 842V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.75 0.35 0.16 0.72 0.70 0.09 0.20 0.46 0.46Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 573 0 537 388 673 566 154 1464 638 331 1604 842HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.80Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.9 0.0 17.5 27.2 17.6 16.3 36.1 23.5 19.1 25.9 13.4 13.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.6 0.0 1.7 4.9 0.5 0.2 7.0 3.9 0.4 0.1 0.8 1.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.7 0.0 2.4 5.4 2.9 1.0 0.7 5.9 0.5 1.0 3.9 4.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.4 0.0 19.1 32.2 18.1 16.5 43.2 27.4 19.5 25.9 14.1 14.8LnGrp LOS B A B C B B D C B C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 371 615 808 1186Approach Delay, s/veh 19.3 24.5 27.8 15.0Approach LOS B C C BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.1 39.9 30.0 18.4 26.6 30.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 * 4.5 3.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 31.0 27.0 6.6 * 31 27.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 12.9 11.3 4.3 15.7 28.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.3 2.8 0.0 5.9 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.0HCM 6th LOS CNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
9: Old Country Rd & Howard Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 9Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 19 88 103 171 154 104 198 213 55 44 711 24Future Volume (veh/h) 19 88 103 171 154 104 198 213 55 44 711 24Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 100 117 194 175 118 225 242 62 50 808 27Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 356 374 304 220 208 144 199 1031 848 608 1031 860Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1524 1332 1258 873 675 1870 1539 1136 1870 1560Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 100 117 263 0 224 225 242 62 50 808 27Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1524 1804 0 1660 675 1870 1539 1136 1870 1560Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 5.7 8.3 17.8 0.0 16.3 26.2 8.3 2.4 3.0 42.7 1.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 5.7 8.3 17.8 0.0 16.3 68.9 8.3 2.4 11.3 42.7 1.0Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.74 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 356 374 304 298 0 274 199 1031 848 608 1031 860V/C Ratio(X) 0.06 0.27 0.38 0.88 0.00 0.82 1.13 0.23 0.07 0.08 0.78 0.03Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 356 374 304 329 0 303 199 1031 848 608 1031 860HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.59 0.59Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.5 42.3 43.4 51.0 0.0 50.4 53.2 14.5 13.1 17.4 22.2 12.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 1.7 3.5 20.5 0.0 13.3 103.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 3.6 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 2.8 3.5 9.7 0.0 7.8 12.0 3.6 0.8 0.8 18.8 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.8 44.0 46.9 71.5 0.0 63.7 156.1 15.0 13.3 17.5 25.8 12.9LnGrp LOS D D D E A E F B B B C BApproach Vol, veh/h 239 487 529 885Approach Delay, s/veh 45.1 67.9 74.8 24.9Approach LOS D E E CTimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.2 73.0 23.8 73.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.2 4.1 3.2 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.8 68.9 22.8 68.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.3 44.7 19.8 70.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 4.0 0.6 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 49.3HCM 6th LOS D HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary10: Club Dr/Dartmouth Ave & San Carlos Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 10Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 66 691 163 22 543 44 210 21 24 54 32 96Future Volume (veh/h) 66 691 163 22 543 44 210 21 24 54 32 96Initial Q (Qb), veh 000010010010Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 71 743 173 24 584 42 226 23 21 58 34 56Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 112 799 186 62 897 64 248 36 250 95 65 126Arrive On Green 0.06 0.55 0.55 0.03 0.52 0.52 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.08 0.08Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1458 340 1781 1721 124 1624 165 1532 1143 670 1445Grp Volume(v), veh/h 71 0 916 24 0 626 249 0 21 92 0 56Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1798 1781 0 1844 1789 0 1532 1813 0 1445Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 0.0 43.9 1.2 0.0 23.1 12.7 0.0 1.1 4.6 0.0 3.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 0.0 43.9 1.2 0.0 23.1 12.7 0.0 1.1 4.6 0.0 3.5Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.07 0.91 1.00 0.63 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 112 0 985 62 0 961 293 0 250 155 0 126V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.93 0.39 0.00 0.65 0.85 0.00 0.08 0.59 0.00 0.45Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 154 0 1111 154 0 1140 369 0 315 366 0 292HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.3 0.0 19.7 44.7 0.0 16.5 38.9 0.0 33.6 41.6 0.0 41.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.9 0.0 12.5 4.0 0.0 1.0 14.2 0.0 0.1 3.6 0.0 2.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 20.3 0.6 0.0 9.6 7.0 0.0 0.4 2.4 0.0 1.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.2 0.0 32.3 48.6 0.0 17.5 53.7 0.0 33.7 45.8 0.0 43.4LnGrp LOS D A C D A B D A C D A DApproach Vol, veh/h 987 650 270 148Approach Delay, s/veh 33.5 18.6 52.2 44.9Approach LOS C B D DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 56.4 11.6 9.4 53.7 19.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.7 3.5 4.9 3.7Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.1 57.9 18.9 8.1 57.9 19.3Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 45.9 6.6 5.6 25.1 14.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.6 0.5 0.0 4.9 0.6Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.1HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Alameda de las Pulgas & San Carlos Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 11 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 415 306 304 552 313 281Future Volume (veh/h) 415 306 304 552 313 281Initial Q (Qb), veh 501300Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 441 213 323 587 333 271Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 621 516 365 1142 428 712Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.21 0.61 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1532 1781 1870 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 441 213 323 587 333 271Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1532 1781 1870 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 11.8 6.2 9.9 10.1 9.9 6.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.8 6.2 9.9 10.1 9.9 6.4Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 621 516 365 1142 428 712V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.41 0.89 0.51 0.78 0.38Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 912 747 409 1473 849 1092HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.0 14.8 23.5 6.4 20.7 10.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 0.8 19.6 0.5 3.1 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 1.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.6 2.1 6.3 3.4 4.2 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.8 15.6 43.5 7.0 23.8 11.0LnGrp LOS C B D A C BApproach Vol, veh/h 654 910 604Approach Delay, s/veh 19.1 20.0 18.1Approach LOS B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 22.7 17.9 38.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 * 4.2 * 4.2 * 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 * 28 * 27 * 45Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.9 13.8 11.9 12.1Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.4 1.8 6.7Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.2HCM 6th LOS BNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary12: Alameda de las Pulgas & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 12Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 115 228 40 135 337 138 75 413 98 118 435 195Future Volume (veh/h) 115 228 40 135 337 138 75 413 98 118 435 195Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000060000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 119 235 7 139 347 117 77 426 79 122 448 179Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 118 233 299 446 332 112 90 563 78 143 450 180Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.33 0.33 0.08 0.36 0.36Sat Flow, veh/h 618 1221 1573 1781 1327 448 1781 1526 283 1781 1257 502Grp Volume(v), veh/h 354 0 7 139 0 464 77 0 505 122 0 627Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1839 0 1573 1781 0 1775 1781 0 1809 1781 0 1760Q Serve(g_s), s 21.9 0.0 0.4 7.3 0.0 28.8 4.9 0.0 29.9 7.8 0.0 40.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 21.9 0.0 0.4 7.3 0.0 28.8 4.9 0.0 29.9 7.8 0.0 40.9Prop In Lane 0.34 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.29Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 350 0 299 446 0 445 90 0 598 143 0 630V/C Ratio(X) 1.01 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.00 1.04 0.86 0.00 0.84 0.86 0.00 0.99Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 350 0 299 446 0 445 90 0 595 143 0 630HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.6 0.0 37.9 35.0 0.0 43.1 54.2 0.0 36.6 52.2 0.0 36.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 50.8 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 54.6 49.9 0.0 10.8 35.6 0.0 34.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 14.9 0.0 0.2 3.2 0.0 19.2 3.5 0.0 16.4 4.9 0.0 23.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 97.3 0.0 37.9 35.4 0.0 97.7 104.1 0.0 52.0 87.9 0.0 71.2LnGrp LOS F A D D A F F A D F A EApproach Vol, veh/h 361 603 582 749Approach Delay, s/veh 96.2 83.3 58.9 73.9Approach LOS F F E ETimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.2 42.7 26.1 9.8 46.1 33.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 * 4.2 4.0 4.9 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.2 37.8 * 22 5.8 41.2 28.8Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.8 31.9 23.9 6.9 42.9 30.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 76.1HCM 6th LOS ENotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

D Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 2025
Appendix D
Intersection Level of Service Calculations (Cumulative General Plan Reset Conditions)

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: El Camino Real & Holly Street 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 22 608 71 421 259 131 68 579 557 168 561 37Future Volume (veh/h) 22 608 71 421 259 131 68 579 557 168 561 37Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000004000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 633 72 439 270 116 71 603 475 175 584 36Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 25 726 87 633 342 283 178 836 648 356 758 47Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.22 0.22Sat Flow, veh/h 111 3168 380 3456 1870 1546 1781 3554 2754 3456 3400 209Grp Volume(v), veh/h 388 0 340 439 270 116 71 603 475 175 305 315Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1865 0 1793 1728 1870 1546 1781 1777 1377 1728 1777 1833Q Serve(g_s), s 13.2 0.0 11.7 7.7 9.0 4.3 2.4 10.2 10.4 3.1 10.5 10.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.2 0.0 11.7 7.7 9.0 4.3 2.4 10.2 10.4 3.1 10.5 10.5Prop In Lane 0.06 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 427 0 411 633 342 283 178 836 648 356 396 409V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.00 0.83 0.69 0.79 0.41 0.40 0.72 0.73 0.49 0.77 0.77Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 427 0 411 633 342 283 178 836 648 372 506 522HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.00 0.97 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.72 0.72 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.4 0.0 23.8 24.8 25.3 23.4 27.4 22.9 23.1 27.5 23.7 23.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 21.8 0.0 12.0 3.0 8.5 2.1 0.4 3.9 5.3 0.8 13.4 13.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.1 0.0 6.1 3.3 4.6 1.7 1.0 4.3 3.8 1.2 5.5 5.7Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.1 0.0 35.9 27.8 33.8 25.5 27.8 26.8 29.4 28.3 37.1 36.8LnGrp LOS D A D C C C C C C C D DApproach Vol, veh/h 728 825 1149 795Approach Delay, s/veh 41.3 29.5 27.9 35.1Approach LOS D C C DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.0 19.0 16.0 10.2 19.8 19.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 * 4.5 4.1 3.5 4.5 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 * 19 11.9 7.0 15.0 14.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 12.5 11.0 5.1 12.4 15.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.9 0.5 0.1 1.5 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.7HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary2: Old Country Rd & Holly Street 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 356 756 219 110 606 106 56 150 130 54 222 131Future Volume (veh/h) 356 756 219 110 606 106 56 150 130 54 222 131Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 363 771 223 112 618 108 57 153 133 55 227 134Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 352 801 491 110 632 116 182 206 179 71 272 223Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.15 0.15Sat Flow, veh/h 1096 2496 1530 461 2657 488 1781 894 777 1781 1870 1536Grp Volume(v), veh/h 601 533 223 449 0 389 57 0 286 55 227 134Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1816 1777 1530 1847 0 1758 1781 0 1671 1781 1870 1536Q Serve(g_s), s 30.5 27.6 11.0 22.6 0.0 20.6 2.8 0.0 15.1 2.9 11.2 7.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 30.5 27.6 11.0 22.6 0.0 20.6 2.8 0.0 15.1 2.9 11.2 7.8Prop In Lane 0.60 1.00 0.25 0.28 1.00 0.47 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 583 570 491 439 0 418 182 0 384 71 272 223V/C Ratio(X) 1.03 0.93 0.45 1.02 0.00 0.93 0.31 0.00 0.74 0.78 0.84 0.60Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 583 570 491 439 0 418 182 0 384 122 376 309HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.62 0.62 0.62 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.3 31.3 25.6 36.2 0.0 35.4 39.6 0.0 34.0 45.2 39.5 38.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 37.7 17.5 1.9 48.5 0.0 29.6 0.1 0.0 2.3 6.8 25.1 11.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 19.2 14.4 4.2 16.0 0.0 12.1 1.2 0.0 6.3 1.4 7.0 3.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 69.9 48.7 27.5 84.7 0.0 65.0 39.6 0.0 36.3 52.0 64.6 49.4LnGrp LOS F D C F A E D A D D E DApproach Vol, veh/h 1357 838 343 416Approach Delay, s/veh 54.6 75.5 36.8 58.0Approach LOS D E D ETimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 26.9 26.7 14.8 18.9 34.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.1 4.1 5.1 * 5.1 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 19.1 22.6 6.5 * 19 30.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 17.1 24.6 4.8 13.2 32.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 59.0HCM 6th LOS ENotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Industrial Rd & Holly St 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 3Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 268 847 25 482 633 570 21 698 372 258 303 178Future Volume (veh/h) 268 847 25 482 633 570 21 698 372 258 303 178Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 268 847 25 482 633 570 21 698 372 258 303 178Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 288 986 30 829 853 380 44 575 1512 249 767 438Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.35 0.35Sat Flow, veh/h 1184 4053 121 3456 3554 1585 1781 1870 2742 3456 2166 1237Grp Volume(v), veh/h 410 350 380 482 633 570 21 698 372 258 247 234Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1811 1702 1845 1728 1777 1585 1781 1870 1371 1728 1777 1626Q Serve(g_s), s 27.7 24.5 24.5 15.4 20.6 30.0 1.5 38.4 8.9 9.0 13.0 13.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 27.7 24.5 24.5 15.4 20.6 30.0 1.5 38.4 8.9 9.0 13.0 13.6Prop In Lane 0.65 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 440 414 449 829 853 380 44 575 1512 249 630 576V/C Ratio(X) 0.93 0.85 0.85 0.58 0.74 1.50 0.47 1.21 0.25 1.04 0.39 0.41Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 440 414 449 829 853 380 100 575 1512 249 630 576HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.3 45.1 45.1 42.0 43.9 47.5 60.1 43.3 14.8 58.0 30.3 30.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 28.7 18.8 17.6 0.9 3.3 237.7 2.9 112.0 0.0 67.0 0.1 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 16.0 12.6 13.5 6.7 9.4 36.8 0.7 35.2 4.5 6.2 5.6 5.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 74.9 63.8 62.7 42.8 47.3 285.2 63.1 155.3 14.9 125.0 30.4 30.6LnGrp LOS E E E D D F E F B F C CApproach Vol, veh/h 1140 1685 1091 739Approach Delay, s/veh 67.4 126.5 105.6 63.5Approach LOS E F F ETimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 34.5 12.5 43.0 35.0 6.6 48.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.6Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 9.0 38.4 30.4 7.0 40.4Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 32.0 11.0 40.4 29.7 3.5 15.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 97.1HCM 6th LOS F HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: El Camino Real & San Carlos Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 4Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 700 255 391 664 665 312Future Volume (vph) 700 255 391 664 665 312Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1505 1770 3539 3539 1556Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1505 1770 3539 3539 1556Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 745 271 416 706 707 332RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 73 0 0 0 240Lane Group Flow (vph) 745 198 416 706 707 92Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 38 5Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA PermProtected Phases 8 1 6 2Permitted Phases 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 21.2 21.2 22.3 50.8 25.0 25.0Effective Green, g (s) 21.2 21.2 22.3 50.8 25.0 25.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.56 0.28 0.28Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 808 354 438 1997 983 432v/s Ratio Prot c0.22 c0.24 0.20 c0.20v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.06v/c Ratio 0.92 0.56 0.95 0.35 0.72 0.21Uniform Delay, d1 33.6 30.3 33.3 10.7 29.3 25.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 15.6 1.2 30.1 0.5 4.5 1.1Delay (s) 49.2 31.5 63.4 11.2 33.9 26.1Level of Service D C E B C CApproach Delay (s) 44.5 30.5 31.4Approach LOS D C CIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 35.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: El Camino Real & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 5Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 50 415 41 188 255 94 58 623 274 262 641 45Future Volume (veh/h) 50 415 41 188 255 94 58 623 274 262 641 45Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 52 432 41 196 266 62 60 649 263 273 668 37Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 64 554 55 318 317 282 75 967 431 377 1677 92Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.34 0.34Sat Flow, veh/h 347 3012 299 1781 1777 1582 1781 3554 1585 3456 4950 273Grp Volume(v), veh/h 278 0 247 196 266 62 60 649 263 273 458 247Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1853 0 1805 1781 1777 1582 1781 1777 1585 1728 1702 1819Q Serve(g_s), s 8.6 0.0 7.8 6.1 8.7 2.0 2.0 9.8 8.7 4.6 6.2 6.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.6 0.0 7.8 6.1 8.7 2.0 2.0 9.8 8.7 4.6 6.2 6.2Prop In Lane 0.19 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 341 0 332 318 317 282 75 967 431 377 1153 616V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.74 0.62 0.84 0.22 0.80 0.67 0.61 0.72 0.40 0.40Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 364 0 355 318 317 282 178 967 431 403 1153 616HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.92 0.00 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.5 0.0 23.1 22.8 23.8 21.1 28.5 19.5 19.1 25.9 15.2 15.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.3 0.0 6.8 7.4 19.8 1.5 5.7 3.0 5.1 4.9 1.0 1.9Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.6 0.0 3.7 3.0 5.1 0.8 0.9 4.0 3.5 2.0 2.3 2.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.7 0.0 29.9 30.2 43.6 22.6 34.2 22.5 24.2 30.8 16.2 17.1LnGrp LOS C A C C D C C C C C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 525 524 972 978Approach Delay, s/veh 32.5 36.1 23.7 20.5Approach LOS C D C CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.5 24.8 14.4 9.5 20.8 15.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.7 3.0 4.5 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 16.1 10.7 7.0 15.1 11.8Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.0 8.2 10.7 6.6 11.8 10.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.3Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.3HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary6: Old Country Rd & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 73 185 157 123 183 119 196 877 91 35 415 27Future Volume (veh/h) 73 185 157 123 183 119 196 877 91 35 415 27Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 78 199 169 132 197 128 211 943 98 38 446 29Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 169 462 270 400 648 463 435 905 94 65 1018 849Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54Sat Flow, veh/h 965 2634 1541 1365 2214 1582 919 1662 173 542 1870 1560Grp Volume(v), veh/h 147 130 169 174 155 128 211 0 1041 38 446 29Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1822 1777 1541 1802 1777 1582 919 0 1835 542 1870 1560Q Serve(g_s), s 8.0 7.1 11.2 8.3 7.4 6.8 19.6 0.0 59.9 0.0 15.7 0.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.0 7.1 11.2 8.3 7.4 6.8 35.3 0.0 59.9 59.9 15.7 0.9Prop In Lane 0.53 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 320 312 270 528 520 463 435 0 999 65 1018 849V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.42 0.62 0.33 0.30 0.28 0.49 0.00 1.04 0.58 0.44 0.03Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 320 312 270 528 520 463 435 0 999 65 1018 849HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.87 0.00 0.87 0.84 0.84 0.84Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.7 40.3 42.0 30.5 30.1 29.9 25.5 0.0 25.1 55.0 15.0 11.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 2.8 7.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 3.3 0.0 38.1 27.9 1.2 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.9 3.4 4.8 3.6 3.2 2.6 4.6 0.0 34.3 1.5 6.6 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.9 43.1 49.2 30.6 30.3 30.1 28.9 0.0 63.1 82.9 16.1 11.7LnGrp LOS D D D C C C C A F F B BApproach Vol, veh/h 446 457 1252 513Approach Delay, s/veh 45.7 30.3 57.3 20.8Approach LOS D C E CTimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 36.6 64.0 23.4 64.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.1 4.1 * 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 59.5 19.3 * 60Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.3 61.9 13.2 61.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.8HCM 6th LOS DNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
7: Industrial Rd & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 7Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 546 417 32 310 384 759 73 483 80 46 148 66Future Volume (vph) 546 417 32 310 384 759 73 483 80 46 148 66Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3428 3228 1770 3539 1540 1770 3348Flt Permitted 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3428 3228 1770 3539 1540 1770 3348Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Adj. Flow (vph) 600 458 35 341 422 834 80 531 88 51 163 73RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 69 0 0 0 68 0 34 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1092 0 0 1528 0 80 531 20 51 202 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 52Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 26Turn Type Split NA Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NAProtected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.4 60.4 7.3 24.6 24.6 5.3 22.6Effective Green, g (s) 41.4 60.4 7.3 24.6 24.6 5.3 22.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.40 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.04 0.15Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 946 1299 86 580 252 62 504v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 c0.47 0.05 c0.15 c0.03 0.06v/s Ratio Perm 0.01v/c Ratio 1.23dl 1.18 0.93 0.92 0.08 0.82 0.40Uniform Delay, d1 54.3 44.8 71.1 61.7 53.1 71.9 57.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 81.4 87.6 74.6 20.6 0.4 58.2 1.5Delay (s) 135.7 132.4 145.7 82.3 53.5 130.1 59.1Level of Service F F F F D F EApproach Delay (s) 135.7 132.4 85.9 71.7Approach LOS F F F EIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 119.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service FHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.11Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.4% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary8: El Camino Real & Howard Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 8Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 78 293 39 160 67 75 110 748 290 69 771 35Future Volume (veh/h) 78 293 39 160 67 75 110 748 290 69 771 35Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 81 305 38 167 70 47 115 779 92 72 803 18Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 244 850 105 358 648 548 147 1106 483 324 2214 50Arrive On Green 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.43 0.43Sat Flow, veh/h 513 2453 304 1035 1870 1581 1781 3554 1551 1781 5137 115Grp Volume(v), veh/h 219 0 205 167 70 47 115 779 92 72 532 289Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1629 0 1641 1035 1870 1581 1781 1777 1551 1781 1702 1847Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 7.0 10.8 1.9 1.5 4.8 14.5 3.3 2.6 7.9 7.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.1 0.0 7.0 17.8 1.9 1.5 4.8 14.5 3.3 2.6 7.9 7.9Prop In Lane 0.37 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 631 0 569 358 648 548 147 1106 483 324 1467 796V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.00 0.36 0.47 0.11 0.09 0.78 0.70 0.19 0.22 0.36 0.36Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 631 0 569 358 648 548 247 1493 652 324 1467 796HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.2 0.0 18.3 24.9 16.6 16.5 33.8 22.8 18.9 26.1 14.4 14.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 0.0 1.8 3.9 0.3 0.3 3.5 3.8 0.9 0.1 0.6 1.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.9 0.0 2.8 2.9 0.8 0.6 2.1 6.2 1.2 1.1 2.9 3.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.7 0.0 20.1 28.8 16.9 16.8 37.2 26.6 19.8 26.3 15.0 15.6LnGrp LOS B A C C B B D C B C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 424 284 986 893Approach Delay, s/veh 19.9 23.9 27.2 16.1Approach LOS B C C BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 36.8 29.0 18.2 27.8 29.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 * 4.5 3.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.4 28.1 26.0 7.0 * 32 26.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.8 9.9 9.1 4.6 16.5 19.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.7 3.2 0.0 6.5 0.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.8HCM 6th LOS CNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
9: Old Country Rd & Howard Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 9Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 78 93 64 71 72 81 232 566 116 233 185 11Future Volume (veh/h) 78 93 64 71 72 81 232 566 116 233 185 11Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 82 98 67 75 76 85 244 596 122 245 195 12Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 565 593 484 108 110 125 539 850 696 226 850 708Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1527 1072 1093 1240 1175 1870 1532 734 1870 1558Grp Volume(v), veh/h 82 98 67 127 0 109 244 596 122 245 195 12Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1527 1817 0 1589 1175 1870 1532 734 1870 1558Q Serve(g_s), s 3.0 3.4 2.8 6.1 0.0 6.0 14.4 23.0 4.2 17.9 5.7 0.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.0 3.4 2.8 6.1 0.0 6.0 20.1 23.0 4.2 40.9 5.7 0.4Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 565 593 484 183 0 160 539 850 696 226 850 708V/C Ratio(X) 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.69 0.00 0.68 0.45 0.70 0.18 1.08 0.23 0.02Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 565 593 484 380 0 332 539 850 696 226 850 708HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.0 22.1 21.9 39.1 0.0 39.1 21.1 19.7 14.6 39.2 15.0 13.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.6 0.6 1.8 0.0 1.9 2.7 4.8 0.5 80.6 0.6 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.3 1.6 1.1 2.8 0.0 2.4 4.1 10.3 1.5 10.0 2.4 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.5 22.7 22.5 40.9 0.0 41.0 23.8 24.5 15.1 119.8 15.5 13.5LnGrp LOS C C C D A D C C B F B BApproach Vol, veh/h 247 236 962 452Approach Delay, s/veh 22.6 40.9 23.1 72.0Approach LOS C D C ETimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 32.2 45.0 12.8 45.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.1 3.7 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.8 40.9 18.8 40.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.4 42.9 8.1 25.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.0 0.6 3.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.9HCM 6th LOS D HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary10: Club Dr/Dartmouth Ave & San Carlos Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 10Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 93 347 173 33 528 103 174 76 43 114 51 169Future Volume (veh/h) 93 347 173 33 528 103 174 76 43 114 51 169Initial Q (Qb), veh 010070011042Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.48Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 106 394 188 38 600 100 198 86 25 130 58 68Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 147 421 48 90 449 24 234 194 147 229 246 151Arrive On Green 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1167 557 1781 1488 248 1260 547 765 1250 558 764Grp Volume(v), veh/h 106 0 582 38 0 700 284 0 25 188 0 68Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1724 1781 0 1736 1807 0 765 1808 0 764Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 0.0 23.8 1.5 0.0 22.1 10.7 0.0 1.9 6.7 0.0 5.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 23.8 1.5 0.0 22.1 10.7 0.0 1.9 6.7 0.0 5.6Prop In Lane 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.14 0.70 1.00 0.69 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 147 0 504 90 0 451 348 0 147 353 0 151V/C Ratio(X) 0.72 0.00 1.15 0.42 0.00 1.55 0.82 0.00 0.17 0.53 0.00 0.45Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 200 0 593 200 0 538 476 0 202 641 0 271HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.8 0.0 32.1 35.7 0.0 33.3 27.9 0.0 24.4 26.3 0.0 25.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.0 0.0 89.8 3.1 0.0 259.8 7.7 0.0 0.5 1.2 0.0 2.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 55.9 0.3 0.0 0.4 2.0 0.0 2.3%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 0.0 24.0 0.8 0.0 48.9 5.4 0.0 0.5 3.5 0.0 1.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.7 0.0 129.0 38.8 0.0 349.0 35.9 0.0 25.3 29.5 0.0 30.2LnGrp LOS D A F D A F D A C C A CApproach Vol, veh/h 688 738 309 256Approach Delay, s/veh 115.7 333.0 35.0 29.7Approach LOS F F D CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.2 29.4 17.3 9.6 27.0 17.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.7 3.5 4.9 3.7Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 22.1 25.3 8.0 22.1 18.8Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 25.8 8.7 6.1 24.1 12.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 172.7HCM 6th LOS F HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Alameda de las Pulgas & San Carlos Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 11 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 588 242 174 453 334 333Future Volume (veh/h) 588 242 174 453 334 333Initial Q (Qb), veh 500610Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 626 150 185 482 355 317Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 758 629 231 1133 452 618Arrive On Green 0.41 0.41 0.13 0.61 0.25 0.25Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1540 1781 1870 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 626 150 185 482 355 317Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1540 1781 1870 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 17.8 3.8 6.1 8.2 11.2 9.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.8 3.8 6.1 8.2 11.2 9.3Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 758 629 231 1133 452 618V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.24 0.80 0.43 0.78 0.51Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 950 782 296 1385 798 917HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.7 12.1 26.2 6.7 21.1 14.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.6 0.3 13.2 0.4 3.0 0.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.7 1.3 3.4 3.4 4.8 1.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.0 12.3 39.4 7.4 24.3 15.0LnGrp LOS C B D A C BApproach Vol, veh/h 776 667 672Approach Delay, s/veh 22.6 16.3 19.9Approach LOS C B BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.8 29.0 19.4 40.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 * 4.2 * 4.2 * 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 * 31 * 27 * 45Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.1 19.8 13.2 10.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.8 2.0 5.2Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.8HCM 6th LOS BNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary12: Alameda de las Pulgas & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative AM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 12Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 179 229 145 183 247 72 59 474 90 109 387 113Future Volume (veh/h) 179 229 145 183 247 72 59 474 90 109 387 113Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000010000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 186 239 109 191 257 58 61 494 69 114 403 81Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 193 248 370 340 282 64 78 528 69 132 537 108Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.04 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.36 0.36Sat Flow, veh/h 801 1029 1536 1781 1476 333 1781 1597 223 1781 1502 302Grp Volume(v), veh/h 425 0 109 191 0 315 61 0 563 114 0 484Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1830 0 1536 1781 0 1809 1781 0 1820 1781 0 1803Q Serve(g_s), s 23.8 0.0 6.0 10.1 0.0 17.7 3.5 0.0 31.3 6.6 0.0 24.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 23.8 0.0 6.0 10.1 0.0 17.7 3.5 0.0 31.3 6.6 0.0 24.4Prop In Lane 0.44 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.17Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 441 0 370 340 0 345 78 0 597 132 0 645V/C Ratio(X) 0.96 0.00 0.29 0.56 0.00 0.91 0.78 0.00 0.94 0.86 0.00 0.75Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 441 0 370 344 0 349 100 0 614 132 0 644HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.0 0.0 32.2 38.1 0.0 41.2 49.1 0.0 34.1 47.5 0.0 29.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 33.5 0.0 0.4 2.0 0.0 27.3 19.3 0.0 22.9 39.1 0.0 4.9Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 14.6 0.0 0.2 4.6 0.0 10.4 2.0 0.0 17.4 4.3 0.0 11.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 72.5 0.0 32.6 40.1 0.0 68.4 68.4 0.0 57.4 86.6 0.0 34.2LnGrp LOS E A C D A E E A E F A CApproach Vol, veh/h 534 506 624 598Approach Delay, s/veh 64.4 57.8 58.4 44.2Approach LOS E E E DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.7 38.8 29.2 8.6 42.0 24.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 * 4.2 4.0 4.9 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.7 35.0 * 25 5.8 36.9 20.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 33.3 25.8 5.5 26.4 19.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 55.9HCM 6th LOS ENotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: El Camino Real & Holly Street 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 61 208 33 776 684 242 35 695 390 147 643 50Future Volume (veh/h) 61 208 33 776 684 242 35 695 390 147 643 50Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 63 214 25 800 705 208 36 716 266 152 663 45Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 84 299 36 1273 689 577 293 1200 934 186 742 50Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.22 0.22Sat Flow, veh/h 728 2595 315 3456 1870 1566 1781 3554 2765 3456 3377 229Grp Volume(v), veh/h 159 0 143 800 705 208 36 716 266 152 349 359Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1834 0 1804 1728 1870 1566 1781 1777 1382 1728 1777 1829Q Serve(g_s), s 10.9 0.0 9.9 28.6 47.9 15.9 2.2 21.7 9.2 5.7 24.8 24.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.9 0.0 9.9 28.6 47.9 15.9 2.2 21.7 9.2 5.7 24.8 24.8Prop In Lane 0.40 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.13Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 0 208 1273 689 577 293 1200 934 186 390 402V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.00 0.69 0.63 1.02 0.36 0.12 0.60 0.28 0.82 0.89 0.89Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 437 0 430 1273 689 577 293 1200 934 186 429 442HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.7 0.0 55.3 48.6 57.1 43.0 46.3 35.7 31.5 60.9 49.2 49.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 0.0 1.5 0.2 16.8 0.2 0.1 1.9 0.7 23.3 25.2 24.9Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.2 0.0 4.6 13.4 27.4 6.7 1.0 9.6 3.1 3.1 13.6 14.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.7 0.0 56.8 48.8 73.9 43.2 46.4 37.6 32.2 84.2 74.5 74.1LnGrp LOS E A E D F D D D C F E EApproach Vol, veh/h 302 1713 1018 860Approach Delay, s/veh 57.3 58.5 36.5 76.0Approach LOS E E D ETimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.9 33.1 52.0 10.5 48.4 19.1Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 * 4.5 4.1 3.5 4.5 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 * 31 47.9 7.0 27.9 31.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 26.8 49.9 7.7 23.7 12.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 56.5HCM 6th LOS ENotesUser approved ignoring U-Turning movement.* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary2: Old Country Rd & Holly Street 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 87 582 61 30 1194 19 154 311 240 123 287 362Future Volume (veh/h) 87 582 61 30 1194 19 154 311 240 123 287 362Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 91 606 64 31 1244 20 160 324 250 128 299 377Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 83 583 278 27 1126 19 190 293 226 123 473 392Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.25 0.25Sat Flow, veh/h 452 3172 1513 85 3578 60 1781 956 737 1781 1870 1549Grp Volume(v), veh/h 372 325 64 679 0 616 160 0 574 128 299 377Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1848 1777 1513 1866 0 1857 1781 0 1693 1781 1870 1549Q Serve(g_s), s 23.9 23.8 5.2 40.9 0.0 40.9 11.5 0.0 39.9 9.0 18.5 31.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 23.9 23.8 5.2 40.9 0.0 40.9 11.5 0.0 39.9 9.0 18.5 31.2Prop In Lane 0.24 1.00 0.05 0.03 1.00 0.44 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 340 327 278 587 0 584 190 0 520 123 473 392V/C Ratio(X) 1.09 1.00 0.23 1.16 0.00 1.05 0.84 0.00 1.10 1.04 0.63 0.96Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 340 327 278 587 0 584 219 0 520 123 473 392HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.87 0.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.1 61.0 52.3 44.6 0.0 44.6 57.0 0.0 45.1 60.5 43.2 47.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 73.0 44.8 1.6 88.8 0.0 52.2 17.5 0.0 68.8 91.5 6.3 36.8Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 18.8 15.5 2.2 33.4 0.0 27.3 6.1 0.0 26.5 7.2 9.4 16.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 134.0 105.8 53.9 133.3 0.0 96.7 74.4 0.0 113.8 152.0 49.4 84.7LnGrp LOS F F D F A F E A F F D FApproach Vol, veh/h 761 1295 734 804Approach Delay, s/veh 115.2 115.9 105.2 82.3Approach LOS F F F FTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.0 45.0 45.0 19.0 38.0 28.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.1 4.1 5.1 * 5.1 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 39.9 40.9 16.0 * 33 23.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.0 41.9 42.9 13.5 33.2 25.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 106.1HCM 6th LOS FNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Industrial Rd & Holly St 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 3Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 101 777 91 332 812 325 196 577 729 555 714 334Future Volume (veh/h) 101 777 91 332 812 325 196 577 729 555 714 334Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 105 809 95 346 846 339 204 601 759 578 744 348Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 106 869 105 767 789 352 225 556 1434 548 771 360Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.30 0.30 0.16 0.33 0.33Sat Flow, veh/h 520 4272 515 3456 3554 1585 1781 1870 2742 3456 2339 1093Grp Volume(v), veh/h 372 312 325 346 846 339 204 601 759 578 565 527Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1844 1702 1762 1728 1777 1585 1781 1870 1371 1728 1777 1654Q Serve(g_s), s 29.2 25.9 26.1 12.6 32.2 30.7 16.4 43.1 26.7 23.0 45.3 45.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 29.2 25.9 26.1 12.6 32.2 30.7 16.4 43.1 26.7 23.0 45.3 45.4Prop In Lane 0.28 0.29 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.66Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 375 346 358 767 789 352 225 556 1434 548 586 545V/C Ratio(X) 0.99 0.90 0.91 0.45 1.07 0.96 0.91 1.08 0.53 1.05 0.96 0.97Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 375 346 358 767 789 352 225 556 1434 548 586 545HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 57.6 56.3 56.4 48.8 56.4 55.8 62.5 51.0 23.2 61.0 47.8 47.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 44.4 28.8 28.8 1.9 53.1 39.5 35.3 61.9 0.2 53.6 28.2 29.9Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 18.3 14.0 14.6 5.7 20.2 16.0 9.6 29.5 13.3 14.1 24.4 23.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 102.1 85.1 85.2 50.7 109.5 95.3 97.8 112.9 23.4 114.6 76.0 77.7LnGrp LOS F F F D F F F F C F E EApproach Vol, veh/h 1009 1531 1564 1670Approach Delay, s/veh 91.4 93.1 67.5 89.9Approach LOS F F E FTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 36.7 26.5 47.7 34.1 21.8 52.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.6Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 23.0 43.1 29.5 18.3 47.8Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 34.2 25.0 45.1 31.2 18.4 47.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 84.9HCM 6th LOS F HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: El Camino Real & San Carlos Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 4Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 343 578 198 856 856 738Future Volume (vph) 343 578 198 856 856 738Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1526 1770 3539 3539 1549Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1526 1770 3539 3539 1549Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 365 615 211 911 911 785RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 439 0 0 0 477Lane Group Flow (vph) 365 176 211 911 911 308Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 32 12Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA PermProtected Phases 8 1 6 2Permitted Phases 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 11.7 11.7 11.3 42.3 27.5 27.5Effective Green, g (s) 11.7 11.7 11.3 42.3 27.5 27.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.60 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.4Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 573 255 285 2138 1390 608v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.12 0.26 c0.26v/s Ratio Perm c0.12 0.20v/c Ratio 0.64 0.69 0.74 0.43 0.66 0.51Uniform Delay, d1 27.2 27.4 28.0 7.4 17.4 16.1Progression Factor 1.18 2.51 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 6.3 9.4 0.6 2.4 3.0Delay (s) 33.7 75.2 37.4 8.0 19.8 19.1Level of Service C E D A B BApproach Delay (s) 59.7 13.5 19.5Approach LOS E B BIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 28.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service CHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: El Camino Real & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 5Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 88 321 46 319 445 193 71 658 62 214 792 79Future Volume (veh/h) 88 321 46 319 445 193 71 658 62 214 792 79Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 92 334 33 332 464 171 74 685 45 223 825 67Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 117 446 46 363 549 400 94 847 376 288 1293 104Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.27 0.27Sat Flow, veh/h 700 2674 275 1425 2151 1570 1781 3554 1579 3456 4805 388Grp Volume(v), veh/h 241 0 218 419 377 171 74 685 45 223 583 309Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1835 0 1814 1799 1777 1570 1781 1777 1579 1728 1702 1789Q Serve(g_s), s 7.6 0.0 6.8 13.6 12.0 5.5 2.5 10.9 1.3 3.8 9.1 9.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.6 0.0 6.8 13.6 12.0 5.5 2.5 10.9 1.3 3.8 9.1 9.1Prop In Lane 0.38 0.15 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 306 0 302 459 453 400 94 847 376 288 916 481V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.72 0.91 0.83 0.43 0.79 0.81 0.12 0.77 0.64 0.64Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 306 0 302 459 453 400 119 847 376 288 916 481HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.93 0.00 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.0 0.0 23.7 21.7 21.1 18.7 28.1 21.6 17.9 26.9 19.3 19.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.8 0.0 7.2 22.8 14.3 2.9 15.6 6.9 0.5 11.3 3.4 6.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.1 0.0 3.3 8.1 6.4 2.1 1.4 4.9 0.5 1.9 3.6 4.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.8 0.0 30.8 44.5 35.5 21.6 43.7 28.4 18.4 38.2 22.7 25.8LnGrp LOS D A C D D C D C B D C CApproach Vol, veh/h 459 967 804 1115Approach Delay, s/veh 33.4 36.9 29.3 26.7Approach LOS C D C CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.2 20.6 19.0 8.0 18.8 14.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.7 3.0 4.5 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 15.3 15.3 5.0 14.3 10.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 11.1 15.6 5.8 12.9 9.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.2HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary6: Old Country Rd & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 32 102 139 59 202 227 143 478 53 12 948 251Future Volume (veh/h) 32 102 139 59 202 227 143 478 53 12 948 251Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 34 107 146 62 213 239 151 503 56 13 998 264Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 88 297 169 116 424 231 203 1092 122 485 1238 1032Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66Sat Flow, veh/h 827 2779 1578 776 2833 1543 564 1649 184 850 1870 1560Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 66 146 146 129 239 151 0 559 13 998 264Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1829 1777 1578 1832 1777 1543 564 0 1833 850 1870 1560Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 5.1 13.7 11.1 10.0 22.5 39.7 0.0 22.2 1.1 58.0 10.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 5.1 13.7 11.1 10.0 22.5 97.7 0.0 22.2 23.4 58.0 10.3Prop In Lane 0.45 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 196 190 169 274 266 231 203 0 1214 485 1238 1032V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.35 0.87 0.53 0.48 1.03 0.74 0.00 0.46 0.03 0.81 0.26Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 243 236 209 274 266 231 203 0 1214 485 1238 1032HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.64 0.64 0.64Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 62.4 62.1 65.9 58.9 58.4 63.8 53.8 0.0 12.3 18.0 18.4 10.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.4 2.9 27.8 1.6 1.4 37.0 21.3 0.0 1.2 0.1 3.7 0.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.9 2.5 6.8 5.3 4.6 11.2 6.8 0.0 9.3 0.2 24.8 3.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.7 65.1 93.7 60.6 59.8 100.8 75.1 0.0 13.6 18.1 22.1 10.7LnGrp LOS E E F E E F E A B B C BApproach Vol, veh/h 287 514 710 1275Approach Delay, s/veh 79.8 79.1 26.7 19.7Approach LOS E E C BTimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.5 103.4 20.1 103.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.1 4.1 * 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 98.9 19.9 * 99Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 24.5 60.0 15.7 99.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.5 0.3 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.6HCM 6th LOS DNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
7: Industrial Rd & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 7Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 230 275 41 166 293 122 239 881 105 399 384 644Future Volume (vph) 230 275 41 166 293 122 239 881 105 399 384 644Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3423 3370 1770 3539 1538 1770 3159Flt Permitted 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3423 3370 1770 3539 1538 1770 3159Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 240 286 43 173 305 127 249 918 109 416 400 671RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 18 0 0 0 68 0 228 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 564 0 0 587 0 249 918 41 416 843 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1 4 4Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 9 4Turn Type Split NA Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NAProtected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 23.0 23.0 21.9 34.9 34.9 30.8 43.8Effective Green, g (s) 23.0 23.0 21.9 34.9 34.9 30.8 43.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.27 0.27 0.24 0.34Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.9 4.9 4.2 4.9Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 605 596 298 950 412 419 1064v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 c0.17 0.14 c0.26 c0.24 0.27v/s Ratio Perm 0.03v/c Ratio 0.93 0.98 0.84 0.97 0.10 0.99 0.89drUniform Delay, d1 52.7 53.3 52.3 47.0 35.7 49.5 39.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 21.6 32.8 18.7 21.8 0.3 41.9 5.0Delay (s) 74.4 86.1 71.0 68.7 36.0 91.4 44.0Level of Service E F E E D F DApproach Delay (s) 74.4 86.1 66.4 57.3Approach LOS E F E EIntersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 67.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service EHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.5% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.c Critical Lane Group HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary8: El Camino Real & Howard Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 8Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 64 164 159 282 248 124 34 710 205 64 1046 90Future Volume (veh/h) 64 164 159 282 248 124 34 710 205 64 1046 90Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000010000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 66 169 144 291 256 89 35 732 39 66 1078 88Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 198 474 418 383 673 566 49 1047 456 330 2269 185Arrive On Green 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.03 0.29 0.29 0.19 0.47 0.47Sat Flow, veh/h 371 1318 1162 1065 1870 1572 1781 3554 1547 1781 4804 392Grp Volume(v), veh/h 195 0 184 291 256 89 35 732 39 66 763 403Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1362 0 1488 1065 1870 1572 1781 1777 1547 1781 1702 1792Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 6.8 20.2 7.6 2.9 1.5 13.7 1.4 2.3 11.4 11.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.3 0.0 6.8 27.0 7.6 2.9 1.5 13.7 1.4 2.3 11.4 11.5Prop In Lane 0.34 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 555 0 536 383 673 566 49 1047 456 330 1608 846V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.00 0.34 0.76 0.38 0.16 0.71 0.70 0.09 0.20 0.47 0.48Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 555 0 536 383 673 566 154 1464 638 331 1608 846HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.52 0.52 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.72Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.1 0.0 17.5 27.5 17.8 16.3 36.2 23.5 19.1 25.9 13.5 13.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.7 0.0 1.8 7.3 0.9 0.3 6.9 3.9 0.4 0.1 0.7 1.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 0.0 2.5 5.7 3.3 1.0 0.7 5.9 0.5 1.0 4.0 4.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.9 0.0 19.3 34.8 18.6 16.6 43.1 27.4 19.5 25.9 14.2 14.8LnGrp LOS B A B C B B D C B C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 379 636 806 1232Approach Delay, s/veh 19.6 25.7 27.7 15.0Approach LOS B C C BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.1 39.9 30.0 18.4 26.6 30.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 * 4.5 3.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 31.0 27.0 6.6 * 31 27.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 13.5 12.3 4.3 15.7 29.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.5 2.8 0.0 5.9 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.2HCM 6th LOS CNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
9: Old Country Rd & Howard Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 9Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 19 88 103 123 164 133 198 205 55 105 640 32Future Volume (veh/h) 19 88 103 123 164 133 198 205 55 105 640 32Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 100 117 140 186 151 225 233 62 119 727 36Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 332 349 284 158 215 182 270 1061 873 637 1061 885Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1522 976 1325 1121 728 1870 1539 1145 1870 1560Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 100 117 261 0 216 225 233 62 119 727 36Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1522 1822 0 1600 728 1870 1539 1145 1870 1560Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 5.7 8.5 17.5 0.0 16.3 36.5 7.7 2.3 7.2 34.4 1.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 5.7 8.5 17.5 0.0 16.3 70.9 7.7 2.3 14.9 34.4 1.3Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.54 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 332 349 284 296 0 260 270 1061 873 637 1061 885V/C Ratio(X) 0.07 0.29 0.41 0.88 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.22 0.07 0.19 0.69 0.04Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 332 349 284 318 0 279 270 1061 873 637 1061 885HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 0.61 0.61Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.9 43.7 44.8 51.2 0.0 50.7 45.3 13.4 12.2 17.0 19.2 12.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 2.0 4.2 21.9 0.0 16.2 25.0 0.5 0.2 0.4 2.2 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 2.9 3.5 9.8 0.0 7.7 8.9 3.3 0.8 1.9 14.8 0.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.3 45.7 49.0 73.1 0.0 66.9 70.2 13.9 12.4 17.4 21.4 12.0LnGrp LOS D D D E A E E B B B C BApproach Vol, veh/h 239 477 520 882Approach Delay, s/veh 47.0 70.3 38.1 20.5Approach LOS D E D CTimer - Assigned Phs 2468Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.5 75.0 23.5 75.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.2 4.1 3.2 4.1Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.8 70.9 21.8 70.9Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.5 36.4 19.5 72.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 3.7 0.5 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.0HCM 6th LOS D HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary10: Club Dr/Dartmouth Ave & San Carlos Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 10Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 62 733 143 22 711 44 182 18 23 51 30 84Future Volume (veh/h) 62 733 143 22 711 44 182 18 23 51 30 84Initial Q (Qb), veh 000010010010Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.91Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 67 788 152 24 765 42 196 19 20 55 32 43Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 107 830 149 61 924 50 228 92 230 95 121 154Arrive On Green 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.03 0.53 0.53 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.08 0.08 0.08Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1516 292 1781 1754 96 1631 158 1525 1146 667 1446Grp Volume(v), veh/h 67 0 940 24 0 807 215 0 20 87 0 43Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1808 1781 0 1850 1789 0 1525 1813 0 1446Q Serve(g_s), s 3.3 0.0 43.3 1.2 0.0 32.9 10.7 0.0 1.0 4.2 0.0 2.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.3 0.0 43.3 1.2 0.0 32.9 10.7 0.0 1.0 4.2 0.0 2.6Prop In Lane 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.05 0.91 1.00 0.63 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 107 0 923 61 0 985 263 0 230 156 0 154V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.00 1.02 0.39 0.00 0.82 0.82 0.00 0.09 0.56 0.00 0.28Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 158 0 1147 158 0 1174 378 0 323 375 0 299HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.4 0.0 28.9 46.7 0.0 18.0 38.4 0.0 36.0 40.4 0.0 40.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.9 0.0 29.8 4.1 0.0 4.0 9.0 0.0 0.2 3.1 0.0 1.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 32.5 0.6 0.0 14.4 5.5 0.0 0.4 2.2 0.0 1.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.3 0.0 58.7 50.7 0.0 22.1 48.0 0.0 36.2 44.1 0.0 41.4LnGrp LOS D A F D A C D A D D A DApproach Vol, veh/h 1007 831 235 130Approach Delay, s/veh 58.2 22.9 47.0 43.2Approach LOS E C D DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.7 56.2 11.4 9.2 53.6 17.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.7 3.5 4.9 3.7Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.1 57.9 18.9 8.1 57.9 19.3Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 45.3 6.2 5.3 34.9 12.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.0 0.4 0.0 6.4 0.7Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.8HCM 6th LOS D HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Alameda de las Pulgas & San Carlos Ave 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 11 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 409 355 310 574 331 272Future Volume (veh/h) 409 355 310 574 331 272Initial Q (Qb), veh 501300Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 435 265 330 611 352 261Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 615 537 332 1135 439 714Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.21 0.61 0.25 0.25Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1532 1781 1870 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 435 265 330 611 352 261Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1532 1781 1870 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 8.3 10.4 11.2 10.8 6.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 8.3 10.4 11.2 10.8 6.2Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 615 537 332 1135 439 714V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.49 0.99 0.54 0.80 0.37Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 884 724 396 1428 823 1071HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.6 15.9 28.4 6.8 22.2 11.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 1.0 41.8 0.6 3.5 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 1.6 0.0 8.1 0.1 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.8 2.9 10.0 3.8 4.9 2.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.4 16.9 78.4 7.5 25.6 11.7LnGrp LOS C B E A C BApproach Vol, veh/h 700 941 613Approach Delay, s/veh 19.7 32.4 19.7Approach LOS B C BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.5 23.1 18.8 39.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 * 4.2 * 4.2 * 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 * 28 * 27 * 45Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.4 14.0 12.8 13.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.6 1.8 7.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.0HCM 6th LOS CNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary12: Alameda de las Pulgas & Brittan Avenue 10/31/2024San Carlos General Plan Reset - Cumulative PM General Plan Reset Synchro 11 ReportW-Trans Page 12Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 118 211 38 135 335 150 77 466 90 122 464 228Future Volume (veh/h) 118 211 38 135 335 150 77 466 90 122 464 228Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000060000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 122 218 5 139 345 130 79 480 71 126 478 213Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 119 213 284 451 325 123 90 622 71 145 470 209Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.36 0.36 0.08 0.39 0.39Sat Flow, veh/h 659 1178 1572 1781 1284 484 1781 1585 234 1781 1212 540Grp Volume(v), veh/h 340 0 5 139 0 475 79 0 551 126 0 691Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1837 0 1572 1781 0 1767 1781 0 1820 1781 0 1752Q Serve(g_s), s 24.4 0.0 0.4 8.5 0.0 34.2 5.9 0.0 37.7 9.4 0.0 52.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 24.4 0.0 0.4 8.5 0.0 34.2 5.9 0.0 37.7 9.4 0.0 52.3Prop In Lane 0.36 1.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.31Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 332 0 284 451 0 448 90 0 651 145 0 679V/C Ratio(X) 1.02 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.00 1.06 0.88 0.00 0.85 0.87 0.00 1.02Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 332 0 284 451 0 448 90 0 648 145 0 679HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.3 0.0 45.4 40.8 0.0 50.4 63.7 0.0 40.8 61.3 0.0 41.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 55.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 59.6 56.3 0.0 10.1 37.8 0.0 39.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 16.4 0.0 0.1 3.8 0.0 22.5 4.1 0.0 20.4 5.8 0.0 29.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 110.9 0.0 45.5 41.2 0.0 110.0 120.0 0.0 55.0 99.1 0.0 80.5LnGrp LOS F A D D A F F A D F A FApproach Vol, veh/h 345 614 630 817Approach Delay, s/veh 110.0 94.4 63.1 83.4Approach LOS F F E FTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 53.0 28.6 10.8 57.2 38.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 * 4.2 4.0 4.9 4.2Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 48.1 * 24 6.8 52.3 34.2Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.4 39.7 26.4 7.9 54.3 36.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 84.7HCM 6th LOS FNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

E Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 2025
Appendix E
Intersection Level of Service Calculations (Near-Term plus Project Conditions)

AM PEAK HOUR
Description Direction Lanes Type LOS Std Capacity Volume v/c LOS Volume v/c LOS Volume v/c LOS v/c increase SR 82 San Carlos City Limit to San Carlos Ave SB 2 Arterial E 2200 996 0.453 A 1067 0.485 A 1053 0.479 A ‐0.01 SR 82 San Carlos Ave to San Carlos City Limit NB 2 Arterial E 2200 701 0.319 A 739 0.336 A 732 0.333 A 0.00 Description Direction Lanes Type LOS Std Capacity Volume v/c LOS Volume v/c LOS Volume v/c LOS v/c increase SR 82 San Carlos Ave to Whipple Ave SB 3 Arterial E 3300 967 0.293 A 977 0.296 A 970 0.294 A 0.00 SR 82 Whipple Ave to San Carlos Ave NB 2 Arterial E 2200 695 0.316 A 905 0.411 A 901 0.410 A 0.00

PM PEAK HOUR
Description Direction Lanes Type LOS Std Capacity Volume v/c LOS Volume v/c LOS Volume v/c LOS v/c increase SR 82 San Carlos City Limit to San Carlos Ave SB 2 Arterial E 2200 1,169 0.531 A 1339 0.609 B 1452 0.660 B 0.05 SR 82 San Carlos Ave to San Carlos City Limit NB 2 Arterial E 2200 998 0.454 A 998 0.454 A 998 0.454 A 0.00 Description Direction Lanes Type LOS Std Capacity Volume v/c LOS Volume v/c LOS Volume v/c LOS v/c increase SR 82 San Carlos Ave to Whipple Ave SB 3 Arterial E 3300 1,238 0.375 A 1433 0.434 A 1487 0.451 A 0.02 SR 82 Whipple Ave to San Carlos Ave NB 2 Arterial E 2200 889 0.404 A 897 0.408 A 898 0.408 A 0.00 Note: Volumes were used at El Camino Real/Holly Street for the northerly segment, and El Camino Real/Howard Ave for the southerly segment

CMP ARTERIAL OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
2045 Existing GP 2045 GPR2045 Existing GP 2045 GPR
Existing 2045 Existing GP 2045 GPR
Existing 2045 Existing GP 2045 GPRExistingExisting

F Traffic Operations Analysis for the General Plan Reset Project April 2025
Appendix F
Intersection Level of Service Calculations (Cumulative plus Project Conditions)

AM PEAK HOUR
Line No. Direction Lanes Type LOS Std Capacity Volume v/c LOS Volume v/c LOS Added Volume v/c LOS v/c increase 1 SR 92 to Whipple Ave SB 6 Freeway E 13800 8,897 0.645 C 12,294 0.891 E 158 12,452 0.902 E 0.011 2 Whipple Ave to SR 92 NB 5 Freeway F 11000 7,118 0.647 C 11,336 1.031 F 272 11,608 1.055 F 0.025

PM PEAK HOUR
Line No. Direction Lanes Type LOS Std Capacity Volume v/c LOS Volume v/c LOS Added Volume v/c LOS v/c increase 1 Holly St to Whipple Ave SB 6 Freeway E 13800 8,237 0.597 C 12,213 0.885 D 325 12,538 0.909 E 0.024 2 Whipple Ave to Holly St NB 5 Freeway F 11000 7,652 0.696 C 10,403 0.946 E 49 10,452 0.950 E 0.005

CMP FREEWAY OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Existing 2045 Old GP 2045 GPRExisting 2045 Old GP 2045 GPR N:\AAA\SMX\SCA\SCA039 General Plan Reset\08 Roadway Analysis\SCA039 CMP Freeway Analysis.xlsx Printed: 11/7/2024 State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Bay Delta Region
2825 Cordelia Road, Suite 100
Fairfield, CA 94534
(707) 428-2002
www.wildlife.ca.gov
Conserving California’s Wildlife Since 1870
February 25, 2025
Akanksha Chopra, Associate Planner
City of San Carlos
600 Elm Street
San Carlos, CA 94070
[email protected]
Subject: 2045 General Plan Reset, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2024060037, City of San Carlos, San Mateo County Dear Akanksha Chopra:

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) received a Notice of Availability of a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (DPEIR) from the City of San Carlos (City) for the 2045 General Plan Reset (Project) pursuant the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines. CDFW previously submitted comments in response to the Notice of Preparation of the DPEIR.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife.

Likewise, we appreciate the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law, may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under the Fish and Game Code.

CDFW ROLE
CDFW is California’s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State. (Fish & G. Code, §§ 711.7, subd. (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. (a).) CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species. (Id., § 1802.) Similarly, for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts, focusing specifically on projects and related activities that have the potential to adversely affect fish and wildlife resources.

CDFW is also submitting comments as a Responsible Agency under CEQA. (Pub.

Resources Code, § 21069; CEQA Guidelines, § 15381.) CDFW expects that it may need to exercise regulatory authority as provided by the Fish and Game Code. As proposed, for example, the Project may be subject to CDFW’s Lake and Streambed Alteration (LSA) regulatory authority. (Fish & G. Code, § 1600 et seq.) Likewise, to the extent implementation of the Project as proposed may result in “take” as defined by Docusign Envelope ID: C0486842-2772-420E-B7E5-B7B7BD244F91 12.b May 27, 2025 Packet Pg. 1949
Akanksha Chopra, Associate Planner
City of San Carlos
February 25, 2025

Page 2 ends

San Carlos City CouncilMay 27, 2025

San Carlos City Council
May 27, 2025