"!"
$)!%)0!%!"#%0!j("&7-"0")
")!
%)0!
6!%)
251
I I -
❖
r--
!""
#"$%
&'
()
*
%)+%),&&
-%.'
(/#0!"
'&)12
!"'."344
5)!& !6
7#!.!"
8".!9"-"&
!%)#
4:4;
"#!.!%)#%)!%
).)
"2%
!).'
%.
$<##'=0>"")2
"2
"
)%)?%
$)"@!
A4:B C%?!"'6>&"0%6
"0D%
")
AE:%?!"DFGHI6
"&)"0J@
"K6
"0&&
0!!")
&%&.")"0!%"0!>&0$%)!%
).%
"2%
!).2
%.
$0@")"9"
22
%9&%?
2 %L"!
"&"062%))#8-%
)F5
"##'")06
"0!"$2&"$")!!%)%?!"$"06
"0>").
$2%0"
!%$!.!"%
9%
!"0.)?)!
9"
0"")9
%)$")!&$2!0
")!?"
!
%6.!"
60"%?$%)!%
).)
"2%
!). #%)!%
).0.")"
&&7)%).%).%
2"
%
2
%"00%?2
%L"!
%9"
0.!M
"2%
!)..")"
&&7%)00!0%?@
!!")%$2&)"
"9"@!!02
"0")!"
!%!"
"0%)3$().>%
7%
6!%
N"
0!??2"
0%)
5!0!")!")!%?!"##'!%<=2
%9
"?
$"@%
(?%
%6$")!$2&"$")!!%)%?!"
"K6
"
$!.!%)M<4=
")!?7$%)!%
).
"2%
!).
"02%)0>&!7M<;=2
%9
"
"%
%?!"
$%)!%
).
"2%
!).M)
<O=")06
"%$2&)"@!!%0"##!!
"@!)!"
"02%)0>&!7
%?!"D!7)
%
H22&)!!%$2&"$")!
"?%&&%@).!>&"&0!0$2!0J$!.!%)$"06
"0
%2!"
>7!"D!7%? )D&"$")!")
%))"!%)@!!"22
%9&%?!"2
%2%0"
2
%L"!J&"9"&%?0.)?)"?!"
$!.!%)J
"02%)0>&")
$%)!%
).2
!"0J)
!"2
%L"!20")@!"$"06
"0
"!%>"
$2&"$")!"
P)&7!%0"")9
%)$")!&!%20?%
@$!.!%)0
"K6
"
"&0!"
)!0#!.!%)
#%)!%
).)
"2%
!).'
%.
$
252
❖ ❖
APPENDICES
APPENDICES
253
U ltraSystems
1 n1• • •r ,or,
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
PROJECT PLANS
254
U ltraSystems
1 n1• • •r ,or,
PROPOSED DESIGN MODIFICATION
EXPERIENCE
Proposed dog parkand volleyball courtarea
255
I t--
\ ' ' ' ' I
• I
, , , , , , ,
I
I
I
I.I) I
' z d)
en:: ~ I
' _j 0 I " 5
j~~ 0 <l
I 0 '~ &I W I n_ I ,j_'!:: ut
Yi
u3
0::
' '.~
i:t,IL
<( &-. l'l 0.
zo
~ ~
• • Ii
• . 1-\ll
•• ct z
G G 5~ U Ill
n_ d)
I I:
e Ill ::i
ZQ
~~ • • I: d) • • < t
G G G 0 $
e • •
APPENDICES
APPENDIX B1
CalEEMod INPUT AND RESULTS FOR AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS
256
U ltraSystems
1 n1• • •r ,or,
7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project Orange County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Architectural Coating - SCAQMD Rule 11131.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population City Park 0.40 Acre 0.40 17,551.00 0
City Park 3.16 Acre 3.16 137,432.00 0
City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,272.00 0
City Park 0.23 Acre 0.23 9,804.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.94 Acre 1.94 84,600.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.87 Acre 0.87 37,785.00 0
Parking Lot 17.92 1000sqft 0.41 17,918.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 112.95 1000sqft 2.59 112,946.00 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 32.73 1000sqft 0.75 32,729.00 0
1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban8
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 30
1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Southern California Edison
2025 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 1 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 257
- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- L--
--- .............................. ~--■
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 11132.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 50.00 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteriorV alue
100 50
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialInteriorV alue
100 50
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 17,551.02 17,551.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 137,431.80 137,432.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 9,804.01 9,804.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 84,600.05 84,600.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 37,784.99 37,785.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.15 3.16 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 2 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 258
- ---t---... - - - 7 - - -.... ---t----t----t----t----t----t -- - .. ~-- .
. ,. ... ,. ....... .
- ■■■I' ■■ JI ■■■ ... ■■■ ... ■■ JI ■■ JI ■■ )I ■■ )I ■■ JI ■■ JI ■■ I
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1636 1.4487 1.5646 3.8000e003 0.3603 0.0603 0.4206 0.1387 0.0562 0.1949 0.0000 342.5704 342.5704 0.0622 0.0108 347.34112024 0.2792 1.8536 2.5584 6.4000e003 0.2852 0.0724 0.3576 0.0769 0.0680 0.1449 0.0000 581.1609 581.1609 0.0766 0.0246 590.4060 Maximum 0.2792 1.8536 2.5584 6.4000e003 0.3603 0.0724 0.4206 0.1387 0.0680 0.1949 0.0000 581.1609 581.1609 0.0766 0.0246 590.4060 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1636 1.4487 1.5646 3.8000e003 0.2303 0.0603 0.2906 0.0808 0.0562 0.1370 0.0000 342.5702 342.5702 0.0622 0.0108 347.34092024 0.2792 1.8536 2.5584 6.4000e003 0.2852 0.0724 0.3576 0.0769 0.0680 0.1449 0.0000 581.1606 581.1606 0.0766 0.0246 590.4057 Maximum 0.2792 1.8536 2.5584 6.4000e003 0.2852 0.0724 0.3576 0.0808 0.0680 0.1449 0.0000 581.1606 581.1606 0.0766 0.0246 590.4057 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 3 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 259
----~----
- ----~ ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- .... • ....
- .
... • .... ' '
................. I ----·---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·---~-----
----~
---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r ---
- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I iiiiiiiiCiiiiiiii ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.14 0.00 16.70 26.86 0.00 17.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 7-1-2023 9-30-2023 0.9729 0.9729
2 10-1-2023 12-31-2023 0.6523 0.6523
3 1-1-2024 3-31-2024 0.6086 0.6086
4 4-1-2024 6-30-2024 0.6021 0.6021
5 7-1-2024 9-30-2024 0.6087 0.6087
Highest 0.9729 0.9729
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0244 2.0000e005 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.2400e- 003 4.2400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5100e- 003 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1122 1.1122 9.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 1.1179 Mobile 2.0800e003 2.2100e- 003 0.0204 5.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 5.3300e- 003 1.4100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 0.0000 4.2954 4.2954 2.7000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 4.3578 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0751 0.0000 0.0751 4.4400e003 0.0000 0.1861 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9772 9.9772 8.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 10.0287 Total 0.0265 2.2300e003 0.0225 5.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 003 4.0000e- 005 5.3400e- 003 1.4100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 0.0751 15.3891 15.4642 5.6500e- 003 3.0000e- 004 15.6950 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 4 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 260
' ' ' '
- ----~ ----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- ____ I ____ I ____ I ____ I ____
I I I I
' ' ' '
----·----·----·----·---- I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- ----~----~----~----~---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
____ I I I I I ____ I ____ I ____ I ____ ........................ ' ' ' '
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0244 2.0000e005 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.2400e- 003 4.2400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5100e- 003 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1122 1.1122 9.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 1.1179 Mobile 2.0800e003 2.2100e- 003 0.0204 5.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 5.3300e- 003 1.4100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 0.0000 4.2954 4.2954 2.7000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 4.3578 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0751 0.0000 0.0751 4.4400e003 0.0000 0.1861 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9772 9.9772 8.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 10.0287 Total 0.0265 2.2300e003 0.0225 5.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 003 4.0000e- 005 5.3400e- 003 1.4100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 0.0751 15.3891 15.4642 5.6500e- 003 3.0000e- 004 15.6950 Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/1/2023 7/14/2023 5 10 2 Grading Grading 7/15/2023 8/25/2023 5 303 Building Construction Building Construction 8/26/2023 10/18/2024 5 300 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 5 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 261
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
- --
--~ ----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . .
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- . .
. . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . - I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
. .
. .
. .
. . . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- ••• _I ••• _I ••• _I ••• _I ••• •
. . . . ' ' ' '
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . . ----·----·----·----·---
- I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- ----►----►----►----►---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
. .
. .
. . . .
. .
. . ---~---· -- I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ---r---L - - I I
I I I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I ---r---L .. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ---r---. -- I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I ------1- - - I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I ...... ~ ■ ■ I
I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . .
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r----
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . • • • _I ••• _I ••• _I ••• _I •••• . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ ■• ■ ■ •· ■ ■ I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . .
4 Paving Paving 10/19/2024 11/15/2024 5 20
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/16/2024 12/13/2024 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 17, Trips and VMT
159
(Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90Acres of Paving: 6.56 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 6 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 262
........' .. .. ··-+ ··
jl ■ ■ ... ■■ I
jl ■ ■ 1111 ■■ I
'
- --- ___ 1, ___ 1, ___ --- ___ 1, ___ 1, ___ --- ___ 1, ___ 1, ___ --- ___ 1, __ a. .... - -- - - -1, - - i
- ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• L •• I
3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e004 6.3300e- 003 6.3300e- 003 5.8200e- 003 5.8200e- 003 0.0000 16.7254 16.7254 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 16.8606 Total 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e004 0.0983 6.3300e- 003 0.1046 0.0505 5.8200e- 003 0.0563 0.0000 16.7254 16.7254 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 16.8606
3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionWater Exposed AreaReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 198.00 77.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 7 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 263
1----t---~---~---~---t -- I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----+-- i -- i -- i -+ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-----+-----------+ -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1----•---~---~---~---L .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .,_ __ ...., __ .!_ __ .!_ __ .!_ __ ~ - -
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .,_ __ ,. __ l..l..l. . .a. -- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----•---~---~---~---~ -- I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----•--~--~--~--t-- 1 I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
1---+--..L.--..L.--..L.--+ - -
--
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~--- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~--- -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----! ----1----1
1----.---~----·----1----1 I -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~--- -t----t I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~--- -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~--- -t----t I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~--- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~--- -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
ii ii ii ;L ii ii ii ii
3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.5000e004 1.8000e- 004 2.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 9.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.9000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.7512 0.7512 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.7571 Total 2.5000e004 1.8000e- 004 2.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 9.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.9000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.7512 0.7512 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.7571 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0442 0.0000 0.0442 0.0227 0.0000 0.0227 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e004 6.3300e- 003 6.3300e- 003 5.8200e- 003 5.8200e- 003 0.0000 16.7253 16.7253 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 16.8606 Total 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e004 0.0442 6.3300e- 003 0.0506 0.0227 5.8200e- 003 0.0286 0.0000 16.7253 16.7253 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 16.8606 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 8 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 264
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.5000e004 1.8000e- 004 2.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 9.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.9000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.7512 0.7512 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.7571 Total 2.5000e004 1.8000e- 004 2.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 9.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.9000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.7512 0.7512 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.7571 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1381 0.0000 0.1381 0.0548 0.0000 0.0548 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e004 0.0214 0.0214 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 81.8028 81.8028 0.0265 0.0000 82.4642 Total 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e004 0.1381 0.0214 0.1594 0.0548 0.0197 0.0745 0.0000 81.8028 81.8028 0.0265 0.0000 82.4642 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 9 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 265
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 8.5000e004 6.1000e- 004 8.7300e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.2900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.3100e- 003 8.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.5041 2.5041 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 2.5235 Total 8.5000e004 6.1000e- 004 8.7300e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.2900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.3100e- 003 8.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.5041 2.5041 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 2.5235 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0621 0.0000 0.0621 0.0247 0.0000 0.0247 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e004 0.0214 0.0214 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 81.8027 81.8027 0.0265 0.0000 82.4641 Total 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e004 0.0621 0.0214 0.0835 0.0247 0.0197 0.0443 0.0000 81.8027 81.8027 0.0265 0.0000 82.4641 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 10 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 266
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 8.5000e004 6.1000e- 004 8.7300e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.2900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.3100e- 003 8.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.5041 2.5041 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 2.5235 Total 8.5000e004 6.1000e- 004 8.7300e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.2900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.3100e- 003 8.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.5041 2.5041 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 2.5235 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0708 0.6473 0.7310 1.2100e003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0296 0.0296 0.0000 104.3121 104.3121 0.0248 0.0000 104.9325 Total 0.0708 0.6473 0.7310 1.2100e003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0296 0.0296 0.0000 104.3121 104.3121 0.0248 0.0000 104.9325 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 11 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 267
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
- . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ; ; ; ;c;;; ;c;;;; . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.4400e003 0.1272 0.0511 6.2000e- 004 0.0218 6.2000e- 004 0.0225 6.3000e- 003 6.0000e- 004 6.8900e- 003 0.0000 62.1046 62.1046 3.6900e- 003 8.9200e- 003 64.8544 Worker 0.0252 0.0180 0.2592 8.1000e004 0.0978 5.1000e- 004 0.0983 0.0260 4.7000e- 004 0.0264 0.0000 74.3703 74.3703 1.7300e- 003 1.8000e- 003 74.9488 Total 0.0286 0.1452 0.3103 1.4300e003 0.1196 1.1300e- 003 0.1208 0.0323 1.0700e- 003 0.0333 0.0000 136.4749 136.4749 5.4200e- 003 0.0107 139.8032 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0708 0.6473 0.7310 1.2100e003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0296 0.0296 0.0000 104.3120 104.3120 0.0248 0.0000 104.9324 Total 0.0708 0.6473 0.7310 1.2100e003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0296 0.0296 0.0000 104.3120 104.3120 0.0248 0.0000 104.9324 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 12 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 268
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
- . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ; ; ; ;c;;; ;c;;;; . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.4400e003 0.1272 0.0511 6.2000e- 004 0.0218 6.2000e- 004 0.0225 6.3000e- 003 6.0000e- 004 6.8900e- 003 0.0000 62.1046 62.1046 3.6900e- 003 8.9200e- 003 64.8544 Worker 0.0252 0.0180 0.2592 8.1000e004 0.0978 5.1000e- 004 0.0983 0.0260 4.7000e- 004 0.0264 0.0000 74.3703 74.3703 1.7300e- 003 1.8000e- 003 74.9488 Total 0.0286 0.1452 0.3103 1.4300e003 0.1196 1.1300e- 003 0.1208 0.0323 1.0700e- 003 0.0333 0.0000 136.4749 136.4749 5.4200e- 003 0.0107 139.8032 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1545 1.4116 1.6975 2.8300e003 0.0644 0.0644 0.0606 0.0606 0.0000 243.4416 243.4416 0.0576 0.0000 244.8807 Total 0.1545 1.4116 1.6975 2.8300e003 0.0644 0.0644 0.0606 0.0606 0.0000 243.4416 243.4416 0.0576 0.0000 244.8807 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 13 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 269
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
- . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ; ; ; ;c;;; ;c;;;; . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.9000e003 0.2959 0.1183 1.4300e- 003 0.0509 1.5200e- 003 0.0525 0.0147 1.4600e- 003 0.0162 0.0000 142.6649 142.6649 8.6900e- 003 0.0206 149.0127 Worker 0.0552 0.0377 0.5633 1.8300e003 0.2282 1.1300e- 003 0.2294 0.0606 1.0400e- 003 0.0617 0.0000 168.0294 168.0294 3.6700e- 003 3.9200e- 003 169.2887 Total 0.0631 0.3336 0.6816 3.2600e003 0.2792 2.6500e- 003 0.2818 0.0753 2.5000e- 003 0.0778 0.0000 310.6943 310.6943 0.0124 0.0245 318.3014 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1545 1.4116 1.6975 2.8300e003 0.0644 0.0644 0.0606 0.0606 0.0000 243.4413 243.4413 0.0576 0.0000 244.8804 Total 0.1545 1.4116 1.6975 2.8300e003 0.0644 0.0644 0.0606 0.0606 0.0000 243.4413 243.4413 0.0576 0.0000 244.8804 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 14 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 270
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
- . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ; ; ; ;c;;; ;c;;;; . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.9000e003 0.2959 0.1183 1.4300e- 003 0.0509 1.5200e- 003 0.0525 0.0147 1.4600e- 003 0.0162 0.0000 142.6649 142.6649 8.6900e- 003 0.0206 149.0127 Worker 0.0552 0.0377 0.5633 1.8300e003 0.2282 1.1300e- 003 0.2294 0.0606 1.0400e- 003 0.0617 0.0000 168.0294 168.0294 3.6700e- 003 3.9200e- 003 169.2887 Total 0.0631 0.3336 0.6816 3.2600e003 0.2792 2.6500e- 003 0.2818 0.0753 2.5000e- 003 0.0778 0.0000 310.6943 310.6943 0.0124 0.0245 318.3014 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.8800e003 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e- 004 4.6900e- 003 4.6900e- 003 4.3100e- 003 4.3100e- 003 0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1885 Paving 8.5900e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0185 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e004 4.6900e- 003 4.6900e- 003 4.3100e- 003 4.3100e- 003 0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1885 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 15 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 271
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.0000e004 2.7000e- 004 4.0600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.2123 1.2123 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.2214 Total 4.0000e004 2.7000e- 004 4.0600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.2123 1.2123 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.2214 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.8800e003 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e- 004 4.6900e- 003 4.6900e- 003 4.3100e- 003 4.3100e- 003 0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1884 Paving 8.5900e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0185 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e004 4.6900e- 003 4.6900e- 003 4.3100e- 003 4.3100e- 003 0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1884 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 16 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 272
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.0000e004 2.7000e- 004 4.0600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.2123 1.2123 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.2214 Total 4.0000e004 2.7000e- 004 4.0600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.2123 1.2123 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.2214 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0398 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.8100e003 0.0122 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5569 Total 0.0416 0.0122 0.0181 3.0000e005 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5569 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 17 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 273
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.0600e003 7.2000e- 004 0.0108 4.0000e- 005 4.3900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.4100e- 003 1.1700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1900e- 003 0.0000 3.2329 3.2329 7.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 3.2571 Total 1.0600e003 7.2000e- 004 0.0108 4.0000e- 005 4.3900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.4100e- 003 1.1700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1900e- 003 0.0000 3.2329 3.2329 7.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 3.2571 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0398 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.8100e003 0.0122 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5568 Total 0.0416 0.0122 0.0181 3.0000e005 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5568 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 18 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 274
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.0600e003 7.2000e- 004 0.0108 4.0000e- 005 4.3900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.4100e- 003 1.1700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1900e- 003 0.0000 3.2329 3.2329 7.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 3.2571 Total 1.0600e003 7.2000e- 004 0.0108 4.0000e- 005 4.3900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.4100e- 003 1.1700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1900e- 003 0.0000 3.2329 3.2329 7.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 3.2571 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 19 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 275
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ; ; ; ;c;;; ;c;;;; . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 2.0800e003 2.2100e- 003 0.0204 5.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 5.3300e- 003 1.4100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 0.0000 4.2954 4.2954 2.7000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 4.3578 Unmitigated 2.0800e003 2.2100e- 003 0.0204 5.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 5.3300e- 003 1.4100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 0.0000 4.2954 4.2954 2.7000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 4.3578
4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.31 0.79 0.88 1,333 1,333
City Park 2.46 6.18 6.91 10,440 10,440City Park 0.36 0.91 1.02 1,540 1,540City Park 0.18 0.44 0.49 745 745 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 3.31 8.33 9.30 14,059 14,059
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 20 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 276
- - - -t - - - -
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~- --- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~---- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~---- ' I
I
I
I
I
•••• L ••••
.
1---.. ---·----····· I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~- --- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~---- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~---- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~---- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~---- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~-- -- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~---- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~---- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~---- ' I
I
I
I
I
F---t---~••••~;;;;
1--1--1 ■ Ii ■ Ii ■ Ir ■ fa ■ Jr ■ Ii ■ Ii ■ Ii ■ Ii ■ fa ■ Ii ■ Ii ■ I ii-- - --t---t---t---t---t---t---t---t---t---t---t---t-- ..- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --- _ .,L _ .,L _ .,L _ .,L - .,L _ ..L _ .,L _ .,L _ .,L _ .,L - ..L - ..L - ...._ I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1--1--•· -: ••:.-:.-:.-:. ·:· -:--:.-:.-:.-:. ·:· ......
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.547453 0.060181 0.185039 0.126487 0.024236 0.006679 0.014707 0.004926 0.000662 0.000378 0.024745 0.000705 0.003801 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.547453 0.060181 0.185039 0.126487 0.024236 0.006679 0.014707 0.004926 0.000662 0.000378 0.024745 0.000705 0.003801 Parking Lot 0.547453 0.060181 0.185039 0.126487 0.024236 0.006679 0.014707 0.004926 0.000662 0.000378 0.024745 0.000705 0.003801
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 21 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 277
~ ..................................... .
~ ..................................... .
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ --~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~-~ ~ ' --t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--~-- 1 I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
i--.. -•··~·-~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··
~ --•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•~~ I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
- --~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--►-- ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I 1
i--.. -•--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~·-t··
---'----+-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I __ .!_ __ .... - - I I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
__ .!_ __ l -- I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
--.!.---1,-- I I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
__ .!_ __ l -- I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
--.!.---1,-- I I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
__ .!_ __ l -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--.!.---1,-- I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
__ .!_ __ l -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I __ .!_ __ .... _ -
I I I I I I
I
I I I I I I
__ .!_ __ l -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
.. -~ .. -~ ..
•••••• 1111 ••
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1122 1.1122 9.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 1.1179 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1122 1.1122 9.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 1.1179 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGasUnmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 22 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 278
-
----~----~--------~ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--- -~ --- -~ --- ·t - ... I I 1
I I 1
I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ .... I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ . . -- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ .. .. I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
- • - .L - • - .L - • - .L •• --
----
... --.. ---·----·----·----------
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
.. .... -~ .... .. -~ .... .. ---------
( I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
... --.. ---•----·----·----····· I I I
I I
- ----~----~----1----1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----~ ----~ ----~ .. -- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ .. -- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ . ... I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ . . -- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1 I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ .... I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ .. -- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ .. .. I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ .. -- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1 I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ . ... I I 1
I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
................... - • - .L - • - .L - • - .L •• - -
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~--------~ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ............................ I I
--------
I I
____ .,_ __ _,. .. .. L .. .. L•-• •t---~
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 23 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 279
- ---
-~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I .. .... -~ .. .... -~ .. .... _____ .....,
-----+---·----·----·---- I I ,1----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~-------I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~--------◄ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
_ ___ I I I _ ___ I
_ __ _
.......................... I I
I I
t---1---+ ---L ---L ---t---◄
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 6271.3 1.1122 9.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 1.1179 Total 1.1122 9.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 1.1179
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 24 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 280
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
•• • _I •• • _I •• •• .......................... I I
I I
t---1---+ -- --L -- --L -- --t---◄
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 6271.3 1.1122 9.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 1.1179 Total 1.1122 9.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 1.1179
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 25 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 281
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
•• • _I •• • _I •• •• .......................... I I
I I
t---1---+ -- --L -- --L -- --t---◄
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0244 2.0000e005 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.2400e- 003 4.2400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5100e- 003 Unmitigated 0.0244 2.0000e005 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.2400e- 003 4.2400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5100e- 003
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
3.9800e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
0.0202 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.0000e004 2.0000e- 005 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.2400e- 003 4.2400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5100e- 003 Total 0.0244 2.0000e005 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.2400e- 003 4.2400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5100e- 003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 26 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 282
----t-··· I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
•••• L • ••• .
----· I ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
.
••••
. L •••• . .. . . . .
--------------
----~----~---------- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~ ----~ ----1----11
----·----·---- I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--- -r--- -r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--- -r--- -r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
•••• I •••• I •••• . .............
6.2 Area by SubCategory
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
3.9800e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
0.0202 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.0000e004 2.0000e- 005 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.2400e- 003 4.2400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5100e- 003 Total 0.0244 2.0000e005 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.2400e- 003 4.2400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5100e- 003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 27 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 283
----~----~----0-----<1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ----t----t
----.. ---•----·----·---- I I ,1----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----►----►------- 1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----0-----<1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
____ I I I ____ I ___ _
..............
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 9.9772 8.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 10.0287
Unmitigated 9.9772 8.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 10.0287
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 / 5.0638 9.9772 8.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 10.0287 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 9.9772 8.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 10.0287
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 28 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 284
--
--- -t -- - - I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
;;;;~;;;;
----~----~----·----~ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----•1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----•1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I __ •• I __ •• I __ •• ..........................
I I
____ ._ __ .. ____ L----L----·~--◄
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 / 5.0638 9.9772 8.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 10.0287 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 9.9772 8.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 10.0287
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 29 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 285
- ----~----~----t-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
• •• _I • •• _I • ••• ....... 4 ........ 4 ........ 4
I I
.,_ __ .,_ __ +- ---L •••• L . ....... --◄
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0751 4.4400e003 0.0000 0.1861
Unmitigated 0.0751 4.4400e003 0.0000 0.1861
Category/Year8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr tons Land Use
City Park 0.37 0.0751 4.4400e003 0.0000 0.1861
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0751 4.4400e003 0.0000 0.1861
Unmitigated
Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 30 of 32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Orange County, Annual 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 286
t I I If I
-------~-------~-------~-------~------~-----------
• I I If I
I I I If I
-------~-------~-------~-------~------~-----------
• I I If I
-------
...., ______ ....., ______ ....., ______ ..,.
-----------
I I I t•
l 1 l
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr tons Land Use
City Park 0.37 0.0751 4.4400e003 0.0000 0.1861
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0751 4.4400e003 0.0000 0.1861
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Fuel Type Load Factor Horse Power Days/Year Hours/Day Number Equipment Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Fuel Type Load Factor Horse Power Hours/Year Hours/Day Number Equipment Type Boilers
Fuel Type Boiler Rating Heat Input/Year Heat Input/Day Number Equipment Type User Defined Equipment
Number Equipment Type
Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 31 of 32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Orange County, Annual 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 287
I I I If I
--- ----·-------~-------~-------~------~-
• I I If I
---- -- ----
I I If I
I I I If I
--- ----·-------~-------~-------~------~-
• I I If I
---- -- ----
I I If I
11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:17 PM Page 32 of 32 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 288
7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project Orange County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Architectural Coating - SCAQMD Rule 11131.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population City Park 0.40 Acre 0.40 17,551.00 0
City Park 3.16 Acre 3.16 137,432.00 0
City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,272.00 0
City Park 0.23 Acre 0.23 9,804.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.94 Acre 1.94 84,600.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.87 Acre 0.87 37,785.00 0
Parking Lot 17.92 1000sqft 0.41 17,918.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 112.95 1000sqft 2.59 112,946.00 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 32.73 1000sqft 0.75 32,729.00 0
1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban8
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 30
1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Southern California Edison
2025 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 1 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 289
- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- L--
--- .............................. ~--■
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 11132.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 50.00 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteriorV alue
100 50
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialInteriorV alue
100 50
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 17,551.02 17,551.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 137,431.80 137,432.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 9,804.01 9,804.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 84,600.05 84,600.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 37,784.99 37,785.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.15 3.16 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 2 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 290
- ---t---... - - - 7 - - -.... ---t----t----t----t----t----t -- - .. ~-- .
. ,. ... ,. ....... .
- ■■■I' ■■ JI ■■■ ... ■■■ ... ■■ JI ■■ JI ■■ )I ■■ )I ■■ JI ■■ JI ■■ I
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.3781 34.5516 28.6619 0.0640 19.8582 1.4256 21.1253 10.1558 1.3116 11.3215 0.0000 6,202.150 1 6,202.150
1 1.9484 0.2589 6,252.088
2 2024 4.2632 16.4547 22.9037 0.0586 2.7055 0.6385 3.3440 0.7286 0.6006 1.3293 0.0000 5,880.182 0 5,880.182
0 0.7333 0.2538 5,974.152
3 Maximum 4.2632 34.5516 28.6619 0.0640 19.8582 1.4256 21.1253 10.1558 1.3116 11.3215 0.0000 6,202.150 1 6,202.150
1 1.9484 0.2589 6,252.088
2 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.3781 34.5516 28.6619 0.0640 9.0469 1.4256 10.3139 4.5995 1.3116 5.7651 0.0000 6,202.150 1 6,202.150
1 1.9484 0.2589 6,252.088
2 2024 4.2632 16.4547 22.9037 0.0586 2.7055 0.6385 3.3440 0.7286 0.6006 1.3293 0.0000 5,880.182 0 5,880.182
0 0.7333 0.2538 5,974.152
3 Maximum 4.2632 34.5516 28.6619 0.0640 9.0469 1.4256 10.3139 4.5995 1.3116 5.7651 0.0000 6,202.150 1 6,202.150
1 1.9484 0.2589 6,252.088
2 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 3 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 291
----~----
- ----~ ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- .... • ....
- .
... • .... ' '
................. I ----·---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·---~-----
----~
---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r ---
- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I iiiiiiiiCiiiiiiii ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.91 0.00 44.18 51.05 0.00 43.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 4 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 292
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0225 0.0213 0.2132 5.0000e004 0.0564 3.4000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.1000e- 004 0.0154 51.0044 51.0044 3.0700e- 003 2.0500e- 003 51.6933 Total 0.1567 0.0214 0.2305 5.0000e004 0.0564 4.0000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.7000e- 004 0.0154 51.0418 51.0418 3.1700e- 003 2.0500e- 003 51.7331 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0225 0.0213 0.2132 5.0000e004 0.0564 3.4000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.1000e- 004 0.0154 51.0044 51.0044 3.0700e- 003 2.0500e- 003 51.6933 Total 0.1567 0.0214 0.2305 5.0000e004 0.0564 4.0000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.7000e- 004 0.0154 51.0418 51.0418 3.1700e- 003 2.0500e- 003 51.7331 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 5 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 293
----~----~----0-----<1
- ----~----~----0-----<1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----~----~----1-----1
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~----~----1----1
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~----~----1-----1
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -
----~ ----~ ----1-----1
-
----~ ----~ ----1-----1
.......................................... ----·----·---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----►----►----- --- -►- -- -►- --- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I I ----r----r---- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I I ----r----r---- - - - -r - - - -r
---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I I
- I I ----r----r---- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r----r---- - - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r----r---- - - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r----r---- - - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I I ----r----r---- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I I ----r----r---- - - - -r - - - -r
- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ••• _I ••• _I •••• • •• _I ••• _I •••• . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .............
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/1/2023 7/14/2023 5 10 2 Grading Grading 7/15/2023 8/25/2023 5 303 Building Construction Building Construction 8/26/2023 10/18/2024 5 3004 Paving Paving 10/19/2024 11/15/2024 5 205 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/16/2024 12/13/2024 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 17,159 (Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90Acres of Paving: 6.56 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 6 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 294
~--+---r---r---r---r-- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~--+---r---r---r---L-- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~--+---r---r---r---L - - I I I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
---r---r---r---. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~--1---..!.. __ _!,_ __ _!,_ __ J _ -
..,. __ .,. ............. . L •• I
I I I I
----.. ■ ■ II ■■ II ■■ II ■■ II ■■ 1
----
- - _ ..- - _ ..- - _ ..- - _ ..- - -1 ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--~-- --~--~--4 .... t t • J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I __ ..1. __ ..1. __ ..1. __ ..1. __ -1, - - t t I I J t t I I J t t t t J I I I I I I I I I J I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·--~---~---~---~---l ...
I
Paving
3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionWater Exposed AreaReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 198.00 77.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 7 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 295
.... ·--- ---"---"---"--- ---"---"-- I, ....
- - ..j. --
i
1t • • • • • •• • • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••• L ••• I I I I I I I I I t---1---- --- --- ---t -- I I I I I ' I I I ' I I I ' I I I I I I I ' I I -----+-- i -- i __ i -+ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -----+------------1- I I I I
-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1----+---~---~---~---L .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .,_ __ ...., __ l_ __ l_ __ l_ __ ~ --
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .,_ __ ,.. __ _L_ _ _L_ _ _L_ __ ~-- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----•---~---~---~---~ .... I I I I I I I I
' I ' I I I • I • I • I I I I I I I I I
' I ' I I I ' I -----•--~--~--~--t-- 1 I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
i---+--..L--..L--..L--+ --
-----• • • •~ • • •~ • • •~ • • -~ • • I
3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0507 0.0324 0.5497 1.7000e003 0.2012 1.0300e- 003 0.2022 0.0534 9.4000e- 004 0.0543 171.6051 171.6051 3.7700e- 003 3.7100e- 003 172.8042 Total 0.0507 0.0324 0.5497 1.7000e003 0.2012 1.0300e- 003 0.2022 0.0534 9.4000e- 004 0.0543 171.6051 171.6051 3.7700e- 003 3.7100e- 003 172.8042 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 8 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 296
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 8.8457 1.2660 10.1117 4.5461 1.1647 5.7108 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0507 0.0324 0.5497 1.7000e003 0.2012 1.0300e- 003 0.2022 0.0534 9.4000e- 004 0.0543 171.6051 171.6051 3.7700e- 003 3.7100e- 003 172.8042 Total 0.0507 0.0324 0.5497 1.7000e003 0.2012 1.0300e- 003 0.2022 0.0534 9.4000e- 004 0.0543 171.6051 171.6051 3.7700e- 003 3.7100e- 003 172.8042 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 9 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 297
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0563 0.0360 0.6108 1.8900e003 0.2236 1.1400e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0500e- 003 0.0603 190.6723 190.6723 4.1900e- 003 4.1200e- 003 192.0046 Total 0.0563 0.0360 0.6108 1.8900e003 0.2236 1.1400e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0500e- 003 0.0603 190.6723 190.6723 4.1900e- 003 4.1200e- 003 192.0046 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 10 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 298
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.1416 0.0000 4.1416 1.6442 0.0000 1.6442 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 4.1416 1.4245 5.5661 1.6442 1.3105 2.9547 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0563 0.0360 0.6108 1.8900e003 0.2236 1.1400e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0500e- 003 0.0603 190.6723 190.6723 4.1900e- 003 4.1200e- 003 192.0046 Total 0.0563 0.0360 0.6108 1.8900e003 0.2236 1.1400e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0500e- 003 0.0603 190.6723 190.6723 4.1900e- 003 4.1200e- 003 192.0046 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 11 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 299
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0777 2.6986 1.1188 0.0138 0.4924 0.0138 0.5062 0.1417 0.0132 0.1549 1,520.360 3 1,520.360
3 0.0904 0.2182 1,587.629
5 Worker 0.5576 0.3567 6.0465 0.0187 2.2132 0.0113 2.2245 0.5869 0.0104 0.5973 1,887.656 1 1,887.656
1 0.0415 0.0408 1,900.845
6 Total 0.6353 3.0552 7.1654 0.0325 2.7055 0.0251 2.7307 0.7286 0.0236 0.7523 3,408.016 4 3,408.016
4 0.1319 0.2589 3,488.475
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 12 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 300
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- .... • .... • .... ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ...
-~ ... -~ .... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - - r - - - - r
--- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0777 2.6986 1.1188 0.0138 0.4924 0.0138 0.5062 0.1417 0.0132 0.1549 1,520.360 3 1,520.360
3 0.0904 0.2182 1,587.629
5 Worker 0.5576 0.3567 6.0465 0.0187 2.2132 0.0113 2.2245 0.5869 0.0104 0.5973 1,887.656 1 1,887.656
1 0.0415 0.0408 1,900.845
6 Total 0.6353 3.0552 7.1654 0.0325 2.7055 0.0251 2.7307 0.7286 0.0236 0.7523 3,408.016 4 3,408.016
4 0.1319 0.2589 3,488.475
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 13 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 301
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- .... • .... • .... ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ...
-~ ... -~ .... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - - r - - - - r
--- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0766 2.6906 1.1105 0.0136 0.4923 0.0145 0.5068 0.1417 0.0139 0.1556 1,496.775 0 1,496.775
0 0.0914 0.2157 1,563.330
8 Worker 0.5239 0.3203 5.6263 0.0181 2.2132 0.0107 2.2239 0.5869 9.8600e003 0.5968 1,827.708 1 1,827.708 1 0.0376 0.0381 1,840.013 8 Total 0.6005 3.0109 6.7369 0.0317 2.7055 0.0252 2.7307 0.7286 0.0237 0.7524 3,324.483 1 3,324.483
1 0.1290 0.2538 3,403.344
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 14 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 302
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- .... • .... • .... ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ...
-~ ... -~ .... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - - r - - - - r
--- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0766 2.6906 1.1105 0.0136 0.4923 0.0145 0.5068 0.1417 0.0139 0.1556 1,496.775 0 1,496.775
0 0.0914 0.2157 1,563.330
8 Worker 0.5239 0.3203 5.6263 0.0181 2.2132 0.0107 2.2239 0.5869 9.8600e003 0.5968 1,827.708 1 1,827.708 1 0.0376 0.0381 1,840.013 8 Total 0.6005 3.0109 6.7369 0.0317 2.7055 0.0252 2.7307 0.7286 0.0237 0.7524 3,324.483 1 3,324.483
1 0.1290 0.2538 3,403.344
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 15 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 303
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- .... • .... • .... ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ...
-~ ... -~ .... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - - r - - - - r
--- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.8594 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8475 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0397 0.0243 0.4262 1.3700e003 0.1677 8.1000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.5000e- 004 0.0452 138.4627 138.4627 2.8500e- 003 2.8900e- 003 139.3950 Total 0.0397 0.0243 0.4262 1.3700e003 0.1677 8.1000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.5000e- 004 0.0452 138.4627 138.4627 2.8500e- 003 2.8900e- 003 139.3950 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 16 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 304
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.8594 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8475 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0397 0.0243 0.4262 1.3700e003 0.1677 8.1000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.5000e- 004 0.0452 138.4627 138.4627 2.8500e- 003 2.8900e- 003 139.3950 Total 0.0397 0.0243 0.4262 1.3700e003 0.1677 8.1000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.5000e- 004 0.0452 138.4627 138.4627 2.8500e- 003 2.8900e- 003 139.3950 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 17 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 305
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.9766 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 4.1574 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1059 0.0647 1.1366 3.6500e003 0.4471 2.1600e- 003 0.4493 0.1186 1.9900e- 003 0.1206 369.2340 369.2340 7.6000e- 003 7.7000e- 003 371.7200 Total 0.1059 0.0647 1.1366 3.6500e003 0.4471 2.1600e- 003 0.4493 0.1186 1.9900e- 003 0.1206 369.2340 369.2340 7.6000e- 003 7.7000e- 003 371.7200 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 18 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 306
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.9766 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 4.1574 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1059 0.0647 1.1366 3.6500e003 0.4471 2.1600e- 003 0.4493 0.1186 1.9900e- 003 0.1206 369.2340 369.2340 7.6000e- 003 7.7000e- 003 371.7200 Total 0.1059 0.0647 1.1366 3.6500e003 0.4471 2.1600e- 003 0.4493 0.1186 1.9900e- 003 0.1206 369.2340 369.2340 7.6000e- 003 7.7000e- 003 371.7200 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 19 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 307
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.0225 0.0213 0.2132 5.0000e004 0.0564 3.4000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.1000e- 004 0.0154 51.0044 51.0044 3.0700e- 003 2.0500e- 003 51.6933 Unmitigated 0.0225 0.0213 0.2132 5.0000e004 0.0564 3.4000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.1000e- 004 0.0154 51.0044 51.0044 3.0700e- 003 2.0500e- 003 51.6933
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.31 0.79 0.88 1,333 1,333
City Park 2.46 6.18 6.91 10,440 10,440City Park 0.36 0.91 1.02 1,540 1,540City Park 0.18 0.44 0.49 745 745 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 3.31 8.33 9.30 14,059 14,059
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 20 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 308
-----
----t··-- 1
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
••• • L ••• • .
----.. ---·----····· I ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
; ; ; -~ii;; ii .
........... _. ■ Ir ■ Ir ■ Ii ■ Ir ■ Ir ■ fa ■ Ir ■ Ir ■ Ii ■ Ii ■ Ir ■ Ir ■ I ii-- - ,---t---t-- -t---t---t-- -t---t-- -t---t---t---t---t-- - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
- _i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i_ ._ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
........... -.. -:. ·:· -: ••:.-:.-:.-:. ·:· -:--:.-:.-: .......
I I
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.547453 0.060181 0.185039 0.126487 0.024236 0.006679 0.014707 0.004926 0.000662 0.000378 0.024745 0.000705 0.003801 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.547453 0.060181 0.185039 0.126487 0.024236 0.006679 0.014707 0.004926 0.000662 0.000378 0.024745 0.000705 0.003801 Parking Lot 0.547453 0.060181 0.185039 0.126487 0.024236 0.006679 0.014707 0.004926 0.000662 0.000378 0.024745 0.000705 0.003801
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 21 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 309
- ................................................. .
I I I I I I I I I I I I
- --~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--
.
- --t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t·· I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ---•-•··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~·· - --►--►--►--►--►--►--►--►--►--►--►--►•• I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
- -- I ~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~ I I I I I I I I I I -- ~--~--~--~·· I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I 1
---•-•·-~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--
- ·· .... ··+·· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - •• .!. •• -1- •• I I I
I
I
I I I I I I
- •• .!. •• 4 .. I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
- •• .!. ........
I I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
- •• .!. •• 4 .. I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
- •• .!. ........
I I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
- •• .!. •• 4 .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ ••• .!. ........ . I I I
I
I
I
I I I I
- •• .!. •• 4 .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - •• .!. ........
I I I I I I
I
I I I I I I
•• .!. •• 4 ..
- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ... ~ ... ~ ...
. .
- ............ .
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGasUnmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 22 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 310
----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -t
-- - - I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- I I - - - - r - - - - r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- - __ __ I __ __ I __ _ _ I . . I
I
I
I
I
- ----L---- ----·----·---- . I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ............... I I
I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- ----~----
- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~----
- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~----
- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r-
--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- I I I ............................ I I I
I
I
I
I I I
;;;;~;;;;
--- -L--- -L----
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 23 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 311
- ---
-~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I .. .... -~ .. .... -~ .. .... _____ .....,
-----+---·----·----·---- I I ,1----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~-------I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~--------◄ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
_ ___ I I I _ ___ I
_ __ _
.......................... I I
I I
t---1---+ ---L ---L ---t---◄
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Unmitigated 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.0218 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.1108 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.6000e003 1.6000e- 004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Total 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 24 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 312
----t-··· I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
•••• L • ••• .
----· I ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
.
••••
. L •••• . .. . . . .
--------------
----~----~---------- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~ ----~ ----1----11
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--- -r--- -r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--- -r--- -r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
•••• I •••• I •••• . .............
6.2 Area by SubCategory
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.0218 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.1108 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.6000e003 1.6000e- 004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Total 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 25 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 313
----~----~----0-----<1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ----t----t
----.. ---•----·----·---- I I ,1----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----►----►------- 1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----0-----<1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
____ I I I ____ I ___ _
..............
11.0 Vegetation
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:19 PM Page 26 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 314
7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project Orange County, Winter
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Architectural Coating - SCAQMD Rule 11131.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population City Park 0.40 Acre 0.40 17,551.00 0
City Park 3.16 Acre 3.16 137,432.00 0
City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,272.00 0
City Park 0.23 Acre 0.23 9,804.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.94 Acre 1.94 84,600.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.87 Acre 0.87 37,785.00 0
Parking Lot 17.92 1000sqft 0.41 17,918.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 112.95 1000sqft 2.59 112,946.00 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 32.73 1000sqft 0.75 32,729.00 0
1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban8
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 30
1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Southern California Edison
2025 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 1 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 315
- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- L--
--- .............................. ~--■
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 11132.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 50.00 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteriorV alue
100 50
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialInteriorV alue
100 50
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 17,551.02 17,551.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 137,431.80 137,432.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 9,804.01 9,804.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 84,600.05 84,600.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 37,784.99 37,785.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.15 3.16 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 2 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 316
- ---t---... - - - 7 - - -.... ---t----t----t----t----t----t -- - .. ~-- .
. ,. ... ,. ....... .
- ■■■I' ■■ JI ■■■ ... ■■■ ... ■■ JI ■■ JI ■■ )I ■■ )I ■■ JI ■■ JI ■■ I
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.3833 34.5552 28.6201 0.0639 19.8582 1.4256 21.1253 10.1558 1.3116 11.3215 0.0000 6,193.034 1 6,193.034
1 1.9485 0.2620 6,243.053
2 2024 4.2734 16.6062 22.5594 0.0578 2.7055 0.6386 3.3441 0.7286 0.6007 1.3294 0.0000 5,795.197 8 5,795.197
8 0.7340 0.2567 5,890.054
0 Maximum 4.2734 34.5552 28.6201 0.0639 19.8582 1.4256 21.1253 10.1558 1.3116 11.3215 0.0000 6,193.034 1 6,193.034
1 1.9485 0.2620 6,243.053
2 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.3833 34.5552 28.6201 0.0639 9.0469 1.4256 10.3139 4.5995 1.3116 5.7651 0.0000 6,193.034 1 6,193.034
1 1.9485 0.2620 6,243.053
2 2024 4.2734 16.6062 22.5594 0.0578 2.7055 0.6386 3.3441 0.7286 0.6007 1.3294 0.0000 5,795.197 8 5,795.197
8 0.7340 0.2567 5,890.054
0 Maximum 4.2734 34.5552 28.6201 0.0639 9.0469 1.4256 10.3139 4.5995 1.3116 5.7651 0.0000 6,193.034 1 6,193.034
1 1.9485 0.2620 6,243.053
2 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 3 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 317
----~----
- ----~ ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- .... • ....
- .
... • .... ' '
................. I ----·---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·---~-----
----~
---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r ---
- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I iiiiiiiiCiiiiiiii ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.91 0.00 44.18 51.05 0.00 43.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 4 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 318
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0223 0.0228 0.2121 4.8000e004 0.0564 3.4000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.1000e- 004 0.0154 49.0837 49.0837 3.1800e- 003 2.1400e- 003 49.8006 Total 0.1565 0.0230 0.2294 4.8000e004 0.0564 4.0000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.7000e- 004 0.0154 49.1211 49.1211 3.2800e- 003 2.1400e- 003 49.8404 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0223 0.0228 0.2121 4.8000e004 0.0564 3.4000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.1000e- 004 0.0154 49.0837 49.0837 3.1800e- 003 2.1400e- 003 49.8006 Total 0.1565 0.0230 0.2294 4.8000e004 0.0564 4.0000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.7000e- 004 0.0154 49.1211 49.1211 3.2800e- 003 2.1400e- 003 49.8404 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 5 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 319
----~----~----0-----<1
- ----~----~----0-----<1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----~----~----1-----1
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~----~----1----1
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~----~----1-----1
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -
----~ ----~ ----1-----1
-
----~ ----~ ----1-----1
.......................................... ----·----·---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----►----►----- --- -►- -- -►- --- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I I ----r----r---- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I I ----r----r---- - - - -r - - - -r
---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I I
- I I ----r----r---- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r----r---- - - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r----r---- - - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r----r---- - - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I I ----r----r---- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I I ----r----r---- - - - -r - - - -r
- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ••• _I ••• _I •••• • •• _I ••• _I •••• . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .............
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/1/2023 7/14/2023 5 10 2 Grading Grading 7/15/2023 8/25/2023 5 303 Building Construction Building Construction 8/26/2023 10/18/2024 5 3004 Paving Paving 10/19/2024 11/15/2024 5 205 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/16/2024 12/13/2024 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 17,159 (Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90Acres of Paving: 6.56 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 6 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 320
~--+---r---r---r---r-- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~--+---r---r---r---L-- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~--+---r---r---r---L - - I I I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
---r---r---r---. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~--1---..!.. __ _!,_ __ _!,_ __ J _ -
..,. __ .,. ............. . L •• I
I I I I
----.. ■ ■ II ■■ II ■■ II ■■ II ■■ 1
----
- - _ ..- - _ ..- - _ ..- - _ ..- - -1 ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--~-- --~--~--4 .... t t • J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I __ ..1. __ ..1. __ ..1. __ ..1. __ -1, - - t t I I J t t I I J t t t t J I I I I I I I I I J I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·--~---~---~---~---l ...
I
Paving
3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionWater Exposed AreaReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 198.00 77.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 7 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 321
.... ·--- ---"---"---"--- ---"---"-- I, ....
- - ..j. --
i
1t • • • • • •• • • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••• L ••• I I I I I I I I I t---1---- --- --- ---t -- I I I I I ' I I I ' I I I ' I I I I I I I ' I I -----+-- i -- i __ i -+ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -----+------------1- I I I I
-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1----+---~---~---~---L .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .,_ __ ...., __ l_ __ l_ __ l_ __ ~ --
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .,_ __ ,.. __ _L_ _ _L_ _ _L_ __ ~-- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----•---~---~---~---~ .... I I I I I I I I
' I ' I I I • I • I • I I I I I I I I I
' I ' I I I ' I -----•--~--~--~--t-- 1 I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
i---+--..L--..L--..L--+ --
-----• • • •~ • • •~ • • •~ • • -~ • • I
3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0554 0.0356 0.5121 1.6200e003 0.2012 1.0300e- 003 0.2022 0.0534 9.4000e- 004 0.0543 163.4007 163.4007 3.8600e- 003 3.9400e- 003 164.6727 Total 0.0554 0.0356 0.5121 1.6200e003 0.2012 1.0300e- 003 0.2022 0.0534 9.4000e- 004 0.0543 163.4007 163.4007 3.8600e- 003 3.9400e- 003 164.6727 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 8 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 322
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 8.8457 1.2660 10.1117 4.5461 1.1647 5.7108 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0554 0.0356 0.5121 1.6200e003 0.2012 1.0300e- 003 0.2022 0.0534 9.4000e- 004 0.0543 163.4007 163.4007 3.8600e- 003 3.9400e- 003 164.6727 Total 0.0554 0.0356 0.5121 1.6200e003 0.2012 1.0300e- 003 0.2022 0.0534 9.4000e- 004 0.0543 163.4007 163.4007 3.8600e- 003 3.9400e- 003 164.6727 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 9 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 323
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0616 0.0396 0.5690 1.8000e003 0.2236 1.1400e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0500e- 003 0.0603 181.5564 181.5564 4.2900e- 003 4.3800e- 003 182.9697 Total 0.0616 0.0396 0.5690 1.8000e003 0.2236 1.1400e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0500e- 003 0.0603 181.5564 181.5564 4.2900e- 003 4.3800e- 003 182.9697 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 10 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 324
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.1416 0.0000 4.1416 1.6442 0.0000 1.6442 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 4.1416 1.4245 5.5661 1.6442 1.3105 2.9547 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0616 0.0396 0.5690 1.8000e003 0.2236 1.1400e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0500e- 003 0.0603 181.5564 181.5564 4.2900e- 003 4.3800e- 003 182.9697 Total 0.0616 0.0396 0.5690 1.8000e003 0.2236 1.1400e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0500e- 003 0.0603 181.5564 181.5564 4.2900e- 003 4.3800e- 003 182.9697 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 11 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 325
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0750 2.8189 1.1546 0.0139 0.4924 0.0139 0.5063 0.1417 0.0133 0.1550 1,522.596 4 1,522.596
4 0.0902 0.2187 1,590.007
4 Worker 0.6094 0.3917 5.6327 0.0178 2.2132 0.0113 2.2245 0.5869 0.0104 0.5973 1,797.408 2 1,797.408
2 0.0425 0.0434 1,811.399
5 Total 0.6844 3.2105 6.7873 0.0316 2.7055 0.0252 2.7308 0.7286 0.0237 0.7524 3,320.004 5 3,320.004
5 0.1327 0.2620 3,401.406
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 12 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 326
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- .... • .... • .... ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ...
-~ ... -~ .... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - - r - - - - r
--- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0750 2.8189 1.1546 0.0139 0.4924 0.0139 0.5063 0.1417 0.0133 0.1550 1,522.596 4 1,522.596
4 0.0902 0.2187 1,590.007
4 Worker 0.6094 0.3917 5.6327 0.0178 2.2132 0.0113 2.2245 0.5869 0.0104 0.5973 1,797.408 2 1,797.408
2 0.0425 0.0434 1,811.399
5 Total 0.6844 3.2105 6.7873 0.0316 2.7055 0.0252 2.7308 0.7286 0.0237 0.7524 3,320.004 5 3,320.004
5 0.1327 0.2620 3,401.406
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 13 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 327
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- .... • .... • .... ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ...
-~ ... -~ .... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - - r - - - - r
--- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0739 2.8108 1.1455 0.0136 0.4923 0.0146 0.5069 0.1417 0.0139 0.1556 1,499.030 8 1,499.030
8 0.0911 0.2162 1,565.725
3 Worker 0.5745 0.3516 5.2471 0.0172 2.2132 0.0107 2.2239 0.5869 9.8600e003 0.5968 1,740.468 2 1,740.468 2 0.0386 0.0406 1,753.521 0 Total 0.6484 3.1625 6.3926 0.0309 2.7055 0.0253 2.7308 0.7286 0.0238 0.7525 3,239.498 9 3,239.498
9 0.1297 0.2567 3,319.246
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 14 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 328
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- .... • .... • .... ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ...
-~ ... -~ .... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - - r - - - - r
--- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0739 2.8108 1.1455 0.0136 0.4923 0.0146 0.5069 0.1417 0.0139 0.1556 1,499.030 8 1,499.030
8 0.0911 0.2162 1,565.725
3 Worker 0.5745 0.3516 5.2471 0.0172 2.2132 0.0107 2.2239 0.5869 9.8600e003 0.5968 1,740.468 2 1,740.468 2 0.0386 0.0406 1,753.521 0 Total 0.6484 3.1625 6.3926 0.0309 2.7055 0.0253 2.7308 0.7286 0.0238 0.7525 3,239.498 9 3,239.498
9 0.1297 0.2567 3,319.246
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 15 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 329
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- .... • .... • .... ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ...
-~ ... -~ .... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - - r - - - - r
--- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.8594 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8475 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0435 0.0266 0.3975 1.3000e003 0.1677 8.1000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.5000e- 004 0.0452 131.8537 131.8537 2.9200e- 003 3.0700e- 003 132.8425 Total 0.0435 0.0266 0.3975 1.3000e003 0.1677 8.1000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.5000e- 004 0.0452 131.8537 131.8537 2.9200e- 003 3.0700e- 003 132.8425 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 16 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 330
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.8594 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8475 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0435 0.0266 0.3975 1.3000e003 0.1677 8.1000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.5000e- 004 0.0452 131.8537 131.8537 2.9200e- 003 3.0700e- 003 132.8425 Total 0.0435 0.0266 0.3975 1.3000e003 0.1677 8.1000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.5000e- 004 0.0452 131.8537 131.8537 2.9200e- 003 3.0700e- 003 132.8425 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 17 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 331
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.9766 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 4.1574 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1161 0.0710 1.0600 3.4800e003 0.4471 2.1600e- 003 0.4493 0.1186 1.9900e- 003 0.1206 351.6097 351.6097 7.7900e- 003 8.2000e- 003 354.2467 Total 0.1161 0.0710 1.0600 3.4800e003 0.4471 2.1600e- 003 0.4493 0.1186 1.9900e- 003 0.1206 351.6097 351.6097 7.7900e- 003 8.2000e- 003 354.2467 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 18 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 332
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.9766 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 4.1574 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1161 0.0710 1.0600 3.4800e003 0.4471 2.1600e- 003 0.4493 0.1186 1.9900e- 003 0.1206 351.6097 351.6097 7.7900e- 003 8.2000e- 003 354.2467 Total 0.1161 0.0710 1.0600 3.4800e003 0.4471 2.1600e- 003 0.4493 0.1186 1.9900e- 003 0.1206 351.6097 351.6097 7.7900e- 003 8.2000e- 003 354.2467 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 19 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 333
--
- - - -~ - - - -t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
--- -~ --- •t-----1
... --.. ---~----·----, ... --.... -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- t-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~--------◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----t----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ---
-· ----· ---- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
---- r ---- r --- .. I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
- - - -r - - - -r - - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - -
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.0223 0.0228 0.2121 4.8000e004 0.0564 3.4000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.1000e- 004 0.0154 49.0837 49.0837 3.1800e- 003 2.1400e- 003 49.8006 Unmitigated 0.0223 0.0228 0.2121 4.8000e004 0.0564 3.4000e- 004 0.0568 0.0150 3.1000e- 004 0.0154 49.0837 49.0837 3.1800e- 003 2.1400e- 003 49.8006
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.31 0.79 0.88 1,333 1,333
City Park 2.46 6.18 6.91 10,440 10,440City Park 0.36 0.91 1.02 1,540 1,540City Park 0.18 0.44 0.49 745 745 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 3.31 8.33 9.30 14,059 14,059
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 20 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 334
-----
----t··-- 1
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
••• • L ••• • .
----.. ---·----····· I ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---- I
I
I
I
I
I
; ; ; -~ii;; ii .
........... _. ■ Ir ■ Ir ■ Ii ■ Ir ■ Ir ■ fa ■ Ir ■ Ir ■ Ii ■ Ii ■ Ir ■ Ir ■ I ii-- - ,---t---t-- -t---t---t-- -t---t-- -t---t---t---t---t-- - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
- _i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i_ ._ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
........... -.. -:. ·:· -: ••:.-:.-:.-:. ·:· -:--:.-:.-: .......
I I
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.547453 0.060181 0.185039 0.126487 0.024236 0.006679 0.014707 0.004926 0.000662 0.000378 0.024745 0.000705 0.003801 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.547453 0.060181 0.185039 0.126487 0.024236 0.006679 0.014707 0.004926 0.000662 0.000378 0.024745 0.000705 0.003801 Parking Lot 0.547453 0.060181 0.185039 0.126487 0.024236 0.006679 0.014707 0.004926 0.000662 0.000378 0.024745 0.000705 0.003801
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 21 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 335
- ................................................. .
I I I I I I I I I I I I
- --~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--
.
- --t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t·· I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ---•-•··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~··~·· - --►--►--►--►--►--►--►--►--►--►--►--►•• I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
- -- I ~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~ I I I I I I I I I I -- ~--~--~--~·· I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I 1
---•-•·-~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--
- ·· .... ··+·· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - •• .!. •• -1- •• I I I
I
I
I I I I I I
- •• .!. •• 4 .. I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
- •• .!. ........
I I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
- •• .!. •• 4 .. I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
- •• .!. ........
I I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
- •• .!. •• 4 .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ ••• .!. ........ . I I I
I
I
I
I I I I
- •• .!. •• 4 .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - •• .!. ........
I I I I I I
I
I I I I I I
•• .!. •• 4 ..
- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ... ~ ... ~ ...
. .
- ............ .
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGasUnmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 22 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 336
----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - -t
-- - - I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- I I - - - - r - - - - r - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- - __ __ I __ __ I __ _ _ I . . I
I
I
I
I
- ----L---- ----·----·---- . I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ............... I I
I
-
----~ ----~ ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- ----~----
- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~----
- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~----
- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r-
--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - ----~---- I I I ............................ I I I
I
I
I
I I I
;;;;~;;;;
--- -L--- -L----
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 23 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 337
- ---
-~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I .. .... -~ .. .... -~ .. .... _____ .....,
-----+---·----·----·---- I I ,1----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~-------I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~--------◄ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----1-----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
_ ___ I I I _ ___ I
_ __ _
.......................... I I
I I
t---1---+ ---L ---L ---t---◄
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Unmitigated 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.0218 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.1108 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.6000e003 1.6000e- 004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Total 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 24 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 338
----t-··· I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
•••• L • ••• .
----· I ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
.
••••
. L •••• . .. . . . .
--------------
----~----~---------- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~ ----~ ----1----11
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--- -r--- -r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--- -r--- -r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
•••• I •••• I •••• . .............
6.2 Area by SubCategory
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.0218 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.1108 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.6000e003 1.6000e- 004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Total 0.1342 1.6000e004 0.0174 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0374 0.0374 1.0000e- 004 0.0398 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 25 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 339
----~----~----0-----<1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ----t----t
----.. ---•----·----·---- I I ,1----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----►----►------- 1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----0-----<1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
____ I I I ____ I ___ _
..............
11.0 Vegetation
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/17/2022 3:21 PM Page 26 of 26 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 340
1000 gallons/year gallons/year Total Gasoline Diesel
ͶͺͺʹǤͶͻͷͷ ͶͺͺʹͶͻͷǤͶͻ ͳͶ͵Ͳʹͺͻͺ
ͻͺǤͻͶͻ͵ͲͶ ͻͺͻͶͻǤ͵ͳ ͵ͶͳͶͺǤͳͺ
ͶͺʹʹͷǤͷͶ͵ͷͶ ͶͺʹʹͷͷͶ͵ǤͷͶ ͳʹͳʹͻͶͻͲ͵
ǤͲ͵ͷͳͳͷͳͺͶ Ͳ͵ͷǤͳʹ ͳͻͳͳǤͳʹͲͻ
͵Ͳʹͺͺ͵ǤͷͺͶʹ ͵Ͳʹͺͺ͵ͷͺͶǤʹͳ ͵ͻͺͶͶͺͷͺ
ͻ͵ͺǤͺͲͳ ͻ͵ͺͺǤͲ ͵ͲͳͻͷͶʹǤ͵Ͷ
733,720 23,348,951,524 26,093 26,044 49
Vehicle
^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗ĂůĐƵůĂƚĞĚďLJhůƚƌĂ^LJƐƚĞŵƐǁŝƚŚĂů
DŽĚ;ϮϬϮϬ͘ϰ͘ϬͿ;Z
^ŽĨƚǁĂƌĞ͕ϮϬϮϮͿ͘ĂůĐƵůĂƚĞĚďLJhůƚƌĂƐLJƐƚĞŵƐǁŝƚŚĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂŝƌZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽĂƌĚͲ DŝƐƐŝŽŶ&ƚŽƌ;
D&ϮϬϮϭǀϭ͘Ϭ͘ϮͿǁĞďƚŽŽů͘
Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: South Coast Air BasinRegion: Orange CountyCalendar Year: 2024 San Bernardino County value: 23,348,951,524 VMT/Year
Project value: 733,720 VMT/Year
VehClass Fuel Type
County Fuel Consumption
County VMT
Project Fuel Consumption (gal/yr)
ͷͲͷͷͻǤ͵ͻͷͻ ͳǡͺʹͺ ͳǡͺͲͳ ʹ
Project VMT
ͳ ͷǤͺΪͲͶ ʹǡʹͷͺ ʹǡʹͷͺ Ͳ
ʹ ͳͳ͵ʹͷǤͶͺʹʹ ǡͲͲ ǡͻͺͷ ʹʹ
Project Totals
341
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: CountyRegion: OrangeCalendar Year: 2024Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 CategoriesUnits: miles/year for CVMT and EVMT, trips/year for Trips, kWh/year for Energy Consumption, tons/year for Emissions, 1000 gallons/year for Fuel Consumption Region Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT Fuel Consumption Orange 2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 7.623311802 192964.0836 45.90357676Orange 2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11093.50859 394730257.9 65921.70473Orange 2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1065891.765 14673028987 488726.4955Orange 2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3266.416655 34177468.18 798.9493074Orange 2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 97776.1357 1212949037 48225.54354Orange 2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 31.55516109 167911.1209 7.035115184Orange 2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 523220.8345 7398448578 302883.5842Orange 2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2063.415332 30179542.34 938.8766016Orange 2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 41326.42062 543435399.8 38686.79938Orange 2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 21602.56979 301545935.2 14556.86997Orange 2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 6721.102951 82760962.9 6736.398638Orange 2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9173.234432 128029558.9 7335.088364Orange 2024 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 50238.99817 111587063.4 2645.142646Orange 2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 324536.5237 4379308435 220479.329Orange 2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4623.453247 63646682.5 2645.932576Orange 2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 6023.474387 19128048.04 3912.895425Orange 2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2969.063612 9732156.515 957.7354645Orange 2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 7429.609302 130056540.2 25180.11526Orange 2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 27477.47253 360643511.9 40331.46866Orange 2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 859.2545526 11755727.79 2270.979312Orange 2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 470.1282933 10651905.51 1489.545626Orange 2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 669.6299914 9893927.628 1111.299608Orange 2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 821.2477494 5491315.988 744.4520695Orange 2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 255.8303759 13800724.35 1129.977377 342
Emissions Inventory
This tool provides emissions from onroad and oxroad mobile sources in California. Please note that emissionsextracted from this web tool are exactly the same as those provided by EMFAC2021 soyware.OutputModel VersionRegion TypeRegion Please be mindful not to choose too many regions and calendar years at the same time. It can cause a download failure. See more info here:
Onroad Emissions Onroad Emission Rates Oxroad Emissions EMFAC2021 v1.0.2 EMFAC2017 v1.0.3
Sub-Area County Metropolitan Planning Organization Air District Air Basin Statewide
Orange
343
EMISSIONS PROJECT ANALYSIS SCENARIO ANALYSIS FLEET DATABASE META EMFAC C\_~ CALIFORNIA rV~ AIR RESOURCES BOARD
A
'1.k
Calendar Year
SeasonVehicle Category
+−
© OpenStreetMap penStreetMap contributors. ontributors. 100 mi
⤢
Select Range Select All
2024 ×
Annual Summer WinterEMFAC202x EMFAC2011 EMFAC2007 Deselect All LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV MH MCY LHDT1 LHDT2MHDT HHDT SBUS UBUS OBUS 344
EMISSIONS PROJECT ANALYSIS SCENARIO ANALYSIS FLEET DATABASE META EMFAC
A
II II
-
Siskivou IY
umbold"rnnitv~Shasta
ass-en
Tehama mumas.
-,.;tte- Glenn , Sien
Mendocino Yt1ba ColUS.il 11 Pla[er 1rro '
er ) IO - '
apa
~d- , , tl ., ~acra
l't d Alpine mo"a 0-
Mari
a AcHIL 1 T,uolumne Mono
,,
- ·:;._-• 9'.-.0{) ' J s~m~:,!., --~•- .., __ .:-: fresn-l?'=,Jr :1 San Benito r:,~1 \\, r,:::;:; 1_11 !.d ! d
.. .1 rr r~ lula re ,i
Inyo'~
St Georg<>•
.....
IA.~ CALIFORNIA rV~ AIR RESOURCES BOARD
Model Year
SpeedFuelOutput UnitResultsShareable link: https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/emissions-inventory/68e88e67d5e4057085391ee1178ce67789ee4816Request Summary Aggregate Select RangeAggregate SelectSelect All
Gasoline × Diesel ×
tons / operation day tons / year
Show Results Download as CSV
EMISSIONS PROJECT ANALYSIS SCENARIO ANALYSIS FLEET DATABASE META 345
►
I
Output Table
S o u r c eEMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions InventoryR e g i o n Ty p eCountyR e g i o nOrangeC a l e n d a r Y e a r2024S e a s o nAnnual V e h i c l e C l a s s i f i c a ti o nEMFAC2007 CategoriesM o d e l Y e a rAggregateS p e e dAggregateU n it smiles/year for CVMT and EVMT, trips/year for Trips, kWh/year forEnergy Consumption, tons/year for Emissions, 1000gallons/year for Fuel Consumption V e h i c l e P o p u l a ti o n a n d A c ti v iti e s A l l Population Total Vehicle Miles Travelled (Total VMT) Combusion Vehicle Miles Travelled (CVMT)Electric Vehicle Miles Travelled (EVMT) Trips Fuel Consumption Energy Consumption for EVMT P o l l u t a n t s A l l
NOx PM2.5 PM10 CO2 CH4 N2O ROG TOG COSOx NH3
RUNEX IDLEX STREX TOTEX DIURN HOTSOAK RUNLOSS PMTW
EMISSIONS PROJECT ANALYSIS SCENARIO ANALYSIS FLEET DATABASE META
RUNEX IDLEX STREX TOTEX DIURN HOTSOAK RUNLOSS PMTW
346
a
__.
EMFAC
A
a
•
__.
C\_~ CALIFORNIA rV~ AIR RESOURCES BOARD
•
PMBW TOTAL
No Vehicle Category Fuel Population CVMT PM10_TOTAL Fuel Consumption
1 HHDT Gasoline 7.62e+0 1.93e+5 2.33e-2 4.59e+12 HHDT Diesel 1.11e+4 3.95e+8 5.95e+1 6.59e+43 LDA Gasoline 1.07e+6 1.47e+10 2.88e+2 4.89e+54 LDA Diesel 3.27e+3 3.42e+7 1.19e+0 7.99e+25 LDT1 Gasoline 9.78e+4 1.21e+9 2.71e+1 4.82e+46 LDT1 Diesel 3.16e+1 1.68e+5 5.03e-2 7.04e+07 LDT2 Gasoline 5.23e+5 7.40e+9 1.56e+2 3.03e+58 LDT2 Diesel 2.06e+3 3.02e+7 7.43e-1 9.39e+29 LHDT1 Gasoline 4.13e+4 5.43e+8 5.22e+1 3.87e+4 10 LHDT1 Diesel 2.16e+4 3.02e+8 3.72e+1 1.46e+4
11 LHDT2 Gasoline 6.72e+3 8.28e+7 9.13e+0 6.74e+3
347
EMISSIONS
11 LHDT2
PROJECT ANALYSIS
Ga
S
so
C
li
E
ne
NARIO ANALYSI
6 S
.72
F
e
L
+3
EET DATA
8. B
28 A
e+
S
7 E META
9.13e+0 6.74e+3
,._,- ,._,- ,._,- ,._,- ,._,- ,._,- ,._,- ,._,-
EMFAC C\_~ CALIFORNIA rV~ AIR RESOURCES BOARD
A
No Vehicle Category Fuel Population CVMT PM10_TOTAL Fuel Consumption 12 LHDT2 Diesel 9.17e+3 1.28e+8 1.74e+1 7.34e+313 MCY Gasoline 5.02e+4 1.12e+8 2.36e+0 2.65e+314 MDV Gasoline 3.25e+5 4.38e+9 9.38e+1 2.20e+515 MDV Diesel 4.62e+3 6.36e+7 1.75e+0 2.65e+316 MH Gasoline 6.02e+3 1.91e+7 1.18e+0 3.91e+317 MH Diesel 2.97e+3 9.73e+6 1.61e+0 9.58e+218 MHDT Gasoline 7.43e+3 1.30e+8 8.02e+0 2.52e+419 MHDT Diesel 2.75e+4 3.61e+8 2.58e+1 4.03e+420 OBUS Gasoline 8.59e+2 1.18e+7 7.30e-1 2.27e+321 OBUS Diesel 4.70e+2 1.07e+7 1.29e+0 1.49e+3 22 SBUS Gasoline 6.70e+2 9.89e+6 6.13e-1 1.11e+3
23 SBUS Diesel 8.21e+2 5.49e+6 6.76e-1 7.44e+2
348
EMISSIONS 24 UBUSPROJECT ANALYSISGasoline SCENARIO ANALYSI2.56e+2 1.38e+7 S FLEET DATABASE META 1.54e+0 1.13e+3 EMFAC C\_~ CALIFORNIA rV~ AIR RESOURCES BOARD
A
Rows per page All 1-24 of 24
Copyright @ 2022 California Air Resources Board
349
EMISSIONS PROJECT ANALYSIS SCENARIO ANALYSIS FLEET DATABASE META EMFAC C\_~ CALIFORNIA rV~ AIR RESOURCES BOARD
A
APPENDICES
APPENDIX B2
CalEEMod INPUT AND RESULTS FOR GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS ANALYSIS
350
U ltraSystems
1 n1• • •r ,or,
7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only Orange County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Const. start and end datesVehicle Trips - Based on Traffic StudyVehicle Emission Factors - Considering only light duty vehicles.Vehicle Emission Factors - Considering only light duty vehicles.Vehicle Emission Factors - Considering only light duty vehicles.
Area Coating - SCAQMD - Rule AC
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - SCAQMD1.1 Land Usage
Fleet Mix - Fleet Mix Total= 1
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 100.00 Space 0.90 40,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban8
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 30
1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Southern California Edison
2025 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 1 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 351
---
---
---
--- ■■■
ii--- ■■■
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100 50tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100 50 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 20.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 300.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 30.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 20.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 10.00 tblFleetMix HHD 4.9260e-003 0.00tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.69tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.08tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.23tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix LHD2 6.6790e-003 0.00tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix MDV 0.13 0.00tblFleetMix MH 3.8010e-003 0.00tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00tblFleetMix OBUS 6.6200e-004 0.00tblFleetMix SBUS 7.0500e-004 0.00tblFleetMix UBUS 3.7800e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.15 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 6.06 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.66 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 994.96 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 2 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 352
- ---t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----+--+--t----4...----+--+--+---+---+--+--t----4...----+--+--+---+---+--+---+ ii--- ■■■I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I' ■■ I tblVehicleEF HHD 1,350.21 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.22 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.1000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.21 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.40 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.48 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.8300e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.7080e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 8.7610e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 1.3900e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.40 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 2.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.6000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 9.0760e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.0000e-006 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 3 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 353
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF HHD 1.3900e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.47 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.18 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.6000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.15 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.98 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.66 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 9.7150e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 983.91 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,350.21 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.22 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.1000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.99 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.27 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.47 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.4660e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.3590e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 8.7610e-003 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 4 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 354
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 1.4100e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.43 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 3.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.5000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 8.9730e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 1.4100e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.50 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 3.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.18 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.5000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.15 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.19 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.66 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,010.23 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 1,350.21 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.08 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 5 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 355
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF HHD 0.22 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.1000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.53 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.36 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.48 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.3340e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.1900e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 8.7610e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 1.5200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.37 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 2.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.0000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 9.2190e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 1.5200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.43 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 2.0000e-006 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 6 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 356
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF HHD 0.18 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.0000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 4.9870e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.3360e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.18 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.38 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.93 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.79 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 621.11 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 11.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.6100e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.52 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.28 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.6300e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.8410e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 6.1240e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.1400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.2500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.4600e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 5.8360e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.9700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.7860e-003 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 7 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 357
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1920e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.14 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.5000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 6.0550e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.7860e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1920e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.14 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 4.9970e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.3830e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.18 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.38 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.89 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.79 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 621.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 11.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.6300e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 8 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 358
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.49 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.27 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.6300e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.8410e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 6.1240e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.1400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.2500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.4600e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 5.8360e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.9700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.4970e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.6080e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.14 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.5000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 6.0550e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.0900e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.4970e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.6080e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.14 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 9 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 359
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF LHD1 4.9850e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.3230e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.18 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.38 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.93 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.79 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 621.11 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 11.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.6100e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.51 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.28 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.6300e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.8410e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 6.1240e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.1400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.2500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.4600e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 5.8360e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.9700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.8230e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.07 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1980e-003 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 10 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 360
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.5000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 6.0550e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.8230e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.07 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1980e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.5550e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6750e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.3360e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.29 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.62 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 13.37 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 629.56 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.62 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5950e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.59 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.20 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3060e-003 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 11 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 361
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.5240e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.2300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.2490e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6550e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.0990e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1380e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.9000e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.2800e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.0870e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.5000e-005 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1380e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.9000e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.5620e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6960e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.0750e-003 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 12 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 362
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.29 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.59 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 13.37 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 629.57 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.58 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5970e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.55 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.19 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3060e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.5240e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.2300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.2490e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6550e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.0990e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5940e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.0670e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 13 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 363
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.2800e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.0870e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.5000e-005 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5940e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.0670e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.5530e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6690e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.3900e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.29 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.62 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 13.37 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 629.56 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.63 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5950e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.58 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.20 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3060e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.5240e-003 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 14 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 364
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.2300e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.2490e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6550e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.0990e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1350e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.8000e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.2800e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.0870e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.5000e-005 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1350e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.8000e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.35 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.23 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 17.97 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 8.52 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 214.62 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 58.88 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 15 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 365
- - -t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----+-----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t - - ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■ -. ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MCY 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.26 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 4.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.2670e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.9890e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 5.0400e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 1.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1160e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.8040e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 1.14 0.00 tblVehicleEF MCY 0.67 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.70 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.34 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.52 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.78 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1240e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 5.8300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 1.14 0.00 tblVehicleEF MCY 0.67 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.70 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.92 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.52 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.94 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.34 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.21 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 17.33 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 16 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 366
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MCY 7.79 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 213.42 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 57.11 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.98 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.25 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 4.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.2670e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.9890e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 5.0400e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 1.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1160e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.8040e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 1.72 0.00 tblVehicleEF MCY 0.72 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.10 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.29 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.49 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.60 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1120e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 5.6500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 1.72 0.00 tblVehicleEF MCY 0.72 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.10 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.86 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.49 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.74 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 17 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 367
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MCY 0.35 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.24 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 18.07 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 8.64 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 214.80 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 59.19 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.27 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 4.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.2670e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.9890e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 5.0400e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 1.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1160e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 2.8040e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 1.27 0.00 tblVehicleEF MCY 0.86 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.74 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.35 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.60 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.82 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1260e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 5.8600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MCY 1.27 0.00 tblVehicleEF MCY 0.86 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.74 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 18 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 368
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MCY 2.93 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.60 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.98 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.3090e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.76 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.56 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 366.23 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 75.11 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 6.8670e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.25 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.4800e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.6530e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 2.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.3650e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5200e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.28 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.6200e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 7.4300e-004 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 19 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 369
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.31 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.5160e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.83 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.20 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 375.90 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 74.45 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 6.3900e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.23 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.4800e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.6530e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 2.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.3650e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5200e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 20 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 370
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MDV 0.25 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.7160e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 7.3700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.28 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.2440e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.74 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.64 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 362.66 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 75.25 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 6.7220e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.25 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.4800e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.6530e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 2.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.3650e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5200e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.13 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 21 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 371
- - -t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----+-----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t - - ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■ -. ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.29 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.5850e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 7.4500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.13 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.32 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 6.3110e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.64 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.69 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1,379.66 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 16.52 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.22 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.23 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.13 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 2.1000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 3.3110e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 22 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 372
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MH 1.9300e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.57 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.04 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.27 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.04 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 9.2180e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.6300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.57 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.04 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.27 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 9.2180e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 6.4280e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.65 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.60 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1,379.69 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 16.37 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.14 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.22 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.13 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 2.1000e-004 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 23 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 373
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 3.3110e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.9300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.77 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.04 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.36 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.04 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 8.9920e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.6200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.77 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.04 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.36 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 8.9920e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 6.2760e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.63 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.70 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1,379.66 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 16.55 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.20 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.23 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.13 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 24 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 374
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 2.1000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 3.3110e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.9300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.61 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.27 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.04 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 9.7620e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 1.6400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.61 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.27 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 9.7620e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.4490e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0860e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.37 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.15 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.07 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 52.09 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD 972.22 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 25 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 375
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MHD 11.38 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.0040e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.12 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 8.9360e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.24 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.97 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.57 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.5400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.13 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 6.1640e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.4700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 3.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 5.8920e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 9.9000e-005 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.5800e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 3.4000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 9.7290e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.9600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 9.2940e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.5800e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 26 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 376
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 3.4000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.2220e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1050e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.31 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.15 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 51.99 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD 972.23 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 11.30 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.9400e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.12 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 8.7690e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.23 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.91 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.57 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.13 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 6.1640e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 3.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 5.8920e-003 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 27 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 377
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MHD 9.9000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.4600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.6100e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 9.8040e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.9500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 9.2940e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 6.4600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.6100e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.7790e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0800e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.46 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.15 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.08 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 52.24 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD 972.22 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 11.40 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.0970e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.12 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 28 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 378
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MHD 9.0440e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.25 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.95 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.57 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.8400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.13 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 6.1640e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.7600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 3.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 5.8920e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 9.9000e-005 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.4700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 3.3600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 9.7060e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.9700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 9.2940e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 4.4700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 3.3600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 29 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 379
- - -t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----+-----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t - - ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■ -. ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.6320e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 3.8930e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.57 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.48 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.18 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 79.64 0.00 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,303.68 0.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 18.90 0.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.10 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.31 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.96 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.77 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.0400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.5670e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.0200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.0000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 3.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.2660e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.6950e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 30 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 380
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.2900e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.11 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.5900e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.6950e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.2900e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.12 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.7120e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 3.9740e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.57 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.49 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.07 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 78.76 0.00 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,303.69 0.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 18.71 0.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.10 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.29 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.90 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 31 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 381
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.76 0.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.2000e-005 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.5670e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.0200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.8000e-005 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 3.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.2660e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.3180e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.2550e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.10 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.5000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.3180e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.2550e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.11 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.5440e-003 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 32 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 382
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF OBUS 3.8700e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.58 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.48 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.20 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 80.87 0.00 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,303.67 0.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 18.93 0.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.10 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.33 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.94 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.77 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.2000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.5670e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.0200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 3.0000e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.2660e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.7040e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.2000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 33 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 383
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.11 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.7000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8700e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.7040e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.2000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.00tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.12 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.09 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.5960e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.5700e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.52 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.79 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.15 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 359.30 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,057.69 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.94 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.6770e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.33 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.70 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.82 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.9590e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.74 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 34 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 384
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.3000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.7880e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.32 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6060e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.6000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.2140e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.42 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.1400e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.10 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.4370e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.9000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.2140e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.60 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.1400e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.7000e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.7020e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.49 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 35 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 385
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.80 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.95 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 367.70 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,057.71 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.60 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.5200e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.40 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.44 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.81 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.3440e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.74 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.3000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.1990e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.32 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6060e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.6000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.6680e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.42 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.6300e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.10 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.5160e-003 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 36 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 386
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.5000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.6680e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.60 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.6300e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.5670e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.6950e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.57 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.79 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.17 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 347.70 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,057.69 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.97 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.7950e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.22 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.62 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.82 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.8080e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.74 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.3000e-005 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 37 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 387
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.6000e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.32 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6060e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.6000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.1730e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.42 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.9200e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.10 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.3270e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.9000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.1730e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.60 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.9200e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.12 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.06 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.27 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 41.11 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.81 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2,017.30 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 19.54 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.34 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 38 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 388
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.44 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.17 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1350e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.0200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 7.5850e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9840e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.8600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.7500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.9810e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.0400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.08 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.2270e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.6420e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.9300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.7500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.9810e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.0400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.38 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.2270e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.11 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.27 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 41.11 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.61 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 39 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 389
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF UBUS 2,017.31 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 19.19 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.34 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.44 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.16 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1350e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.0200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 7.5850e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9840e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.8600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.0300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.2910e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.8300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.08 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1110e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.6420e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.9000e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.0300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.2910e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.8300e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.38 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1110e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.27 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 40 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 390
- - -t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----+-----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t - - ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■ -. ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 41.11 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.85 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2,017.30 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 19.61 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.34 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.44 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.17 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1350e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.0200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 7.5850e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9840e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.8600e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.1900e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.8140e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.0500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.08 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.4930e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.6420e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.9400e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.1900e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.8140e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.0500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.38 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 41 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 391
- - 1----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t---+---+---+---+--+--+---+----1,-.---,1---+--+--+--+---+---+---+--+--+--+ ' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~••• 1111 ■■-.■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■■1- ■■ I
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.4930e-003 0.00tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.11 0.00 tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 0.00 6.90tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 0.00 8.40tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 0.00 16.60tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 0.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.00 3.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.00 3.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.00 0.50 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 42 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 392
- - -t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t - -
' 11••1-•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•• ~•••
II■■ ... ■■ ... ■■ ... ■■ ... ■■ ... ■■ ... ■■ ... ■■ ... ■■ ... ■■ I
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0480 0.4859 0.4534 9.1000e004 0.0176 0.0220 0.0395 5.8200e- 003 0.0202 0.0260 0.0000 81.1816 81.1816 0.0225 9.9000e- 004 82.0400 2024 0.0830 0.7223 0.8953 1.6500e003 0.0265 0.0329 0.0595 7.1500e- 003 0.0304 0.0375 0.0000 146.3020 146.3020 0.0381 2.2500e- 003 147.9230 Maximum 0.0830 0.7223 0.8953 1.6500e003 0.0265 0.0329 0.0595 7.1500e- 003 0.0304 0.0375 0.0000 146.3020 146.3020 0.0381 2.2500e- 003 147.9230 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0480 0.4859 0.4534 9.1000e004 0.0145 0.0220 0.0364 4.3900e- 003 0.0202 0.0246 0.0000 81.1815 81.1815 0.0225 9.9000e- 004 82.0399 2024 0.0830 0.7223 0.8953 1.6500e003 0.0265 0.0329 0.0595 7.1500e- 003 0.0304 0.0375 0.0000 146.3018 146.3018 0.0381 2.2500e- 003 147.9228 Maximum 0.0830 0.7223 0.8953 1.6500e003 0.0265 0.0329 0.0595 7.1500e- 003 0.0304 0.0375 0.0000 146.3018 146.3018 0.0381 2.2500e- 003 147.9228 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 43 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 393
----~----
- ----~ ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- .... • ....
- .
... • .... ' '
................. I ----·---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·---~-----
----~
---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I
- I ----r---- ----r ---
- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r---- - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I - I
- I ----r---- ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I iiiiiiiiCiiiiiiii ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.96 0.00 3.10 11.03 0.00 2.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 7-1-2023 9-30-2023 0.2959 0.2959
2 10-1-2023 12-31-2023 0.2431 0.2431
3 1-1-2024 3-31-2024 0.2246 0.2246
4 4-1-2024 6-30-2024 0.2240 0.2240
5 7-1-2024 9-30-2024 0.2265 0.2265
Highest 0.2959 0.2959
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 3.2600e003 1.0000e- 005 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.6400e- 003 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4828 2.4828 2.1000e004 3.0000e- 005 2.4957 Mobile 0.0255 0.0338 0.5675 2.0300e003 0.2737 1.2100e- 003 0.2749 0.0727 1.1200e- 003 0.0738 0.0000 186.3202 186.3202 3.3400e- 003 3.9900e- 003 187.5943 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0288 0.0339 0.5688 2.0300e003 0.2737 1.2100e- 003 0.2749 0.0727 1.1200e- 003 0.0738 0.0000 188.8056 188.8056 3.5600e- 003 4.0200e- 003 190.0926 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 44 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 394
' ' ' '
- ----~ ----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- ____ I ____ I ____ I ____ I ____
I I I I
' ' ' '
----·----·----·----·---- I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- ----~----~----~----~---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
____ I I I I I ____ I ____ I ____ I ____ ........................ ' ' ' '
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 3.2600e003 1.0000e- 005 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.6400e- 003 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4828 2.4828 2.1000e004 3.0000e- 005 2.4957 Mobile 0.0255 0.0338 0.5675 2.0300e003 0.2737 1.2100e- 003 0.2749 0.0727 1.1200e- 003 0.0738 0.0000 186.3202 186.3202 3.3400e- 003 3.9900e- 003 187.5943 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0288 0.0339 0.5688 2.0300e003 0.2737 1.2100e- 003 0.2749 0.0727 1.1200e- 003 0.0738 0.0000 188.8056 188.8056 3.5600e- 003 4.0200e- 003 190.0926 Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/1/2023 7/14/2023 5 10 2 Grading Grading 7/15/2023 8/25/2023 5 303 Building Construction Building Construction 8/26/2023 10/18/2024 5 300 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 45 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 395
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
- --
--~ ----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . .
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- . .
. . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . - I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
. .
. .
. .
. . . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- ••• _I ••• _I ••• _I ••• _I ••• •
. . . . ' ' ' '
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . . ----·----·----·----·---
- I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- ----►----►----►----►---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
. .
. .
. . . .
. .
. . ---~---· -- I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ---r---L - - I I
I I I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I ---r---L .. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ---r---. -- I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I ------1- - - I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I ...... ~ ■ ■ I
I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . .
- I I I I ----r----r----r----r---- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
------ I I I I ----r----r----r----r----
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . I I I I . . • • • _I ••• _I ••• _I ••• _I •••• . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ ■• ■ ■ •· ■ ■ I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . .
4 Paving Paving 10/19/2024 11/15/2024 5 20
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/16/2024 12/13/2024 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 2,400 (Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5Acres of Paving: 0.9 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 46 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 396
........' .. .. ··-+ ··
jl ■ ■ ... ■■ I
jl ■ ■ 1111 ■■ I
'
- --- ___ 1, ___ 1, ___ --- ___ 1, ___ 1, ___ --- ___ 1, ___ 1, __ ... .. .. - -- - - -1, - - i
- ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■I. ■ ■ I -----.. ···
3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.7000e004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6700e003 0.0309 0.0196 5.0000e- 005 1.1300e- 003 1.1300e- 003 1.0400e- 003 1.0400e- 003 0.0000 4.2748 4.2748 1.3800e- 003 0.0000 4.3094 Total 2.6700e003 0.0309 0.0196 5.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 1.1300e- 003 1.4000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.0400e- 003 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.2748 4.2748 1.3800e- 003 0.0000 4.3094 Grading
3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionWater Exposed AreaReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 5 17.00 7.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 3.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 47 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 397
-· 1---~---r I I -- I I I I I I I I
--__ Lf--,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--1---,--t · - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ..... - - -r - - -L •• I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1 I I 1 I I I I I
--1------+ -- I I
I I
I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I __ ... I _____ I ... I __
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--+---~---~ -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
··-'-··-~---L-- 1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I I I
--+--.l.--+ --
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~-- 1 -------- I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----11
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----11 I
I
I
I
I
I
---- ~ ---- 1-----11
1--------.. ----·----... --... I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~1 ---------- I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----11
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----11 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----11
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----11 I
I
I
I
I
I
- - -- ~ - - -- 1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
----~-- 1 -------- I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----11
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----11 I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiii~iiiiiiii
3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 7.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2087 0.2087 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.2103 Total 7.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2087 0.2087 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.2103 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.2000e004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6700e003 0.0309 0.0196 5.0000e- 005 1.1300e- 003 1.1300e- 003 1.0400e- 003 1.0400e- 003 0.0000 4.2748 4.2748 1.3800e- 003 0.0000 4.3094 Total 2.6700e003 0.0309 0.0196 5.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 004 1.1300e- 003 1.2500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0400e- 003 1.0500e- 003 0.0000 4.2748 4.2748 1.3800e- 003 0.0000 4.3094 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 48 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 398
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 7.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2087 0.2087 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.2103 Total 7.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2087 0.2087 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.2103 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 5.3100e003 0.0000 5.3100e- 003 2.5700e- 003 0.0000 2.5700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0140 0.1527 0.0833 2.1000e004 6.3000e- 003 6.3000e- 003 5.8000e- 003 5.8000e- 003 0.0000 18.5715 18.5715 6.0100e- 003 0.0000 18.7217 Total 0.0140 0.1527 0.0833 2.1000e004 5.3100e- 003 6.3000e- 003 0.0116 2.5700e- 003 5.8000e- 003 8.3700e- 003 0.0000 18.5715 18.5715 6.0100e- 003 0.0000 18.7217 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 49 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 399
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 3.4000e004 2.4000e- 004 3.4900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 3.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.0016 1.0016 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.0094 Total 3.4000e004 2.4000e- 004 3.4900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 3.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.0016 1.0016 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.0094 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.3900e003 0.0000 2.3900e- 003 1.1600e- 003 0.0000 1.1600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0140 0.1527 0.0833 2.1000e004 6.3000e- 003 6.3000e- 003 5.8000e- 003 5.8000e- 003 0.0000 18.5715 18.5715 6.0100e- 003 0.0000 18.7216 Total 0.0140 0.1527 0.0833 2.1000e004 2.3900e- 003 6.3000e- 003 8.6900e- 003 1.1600e- 003 5.8000e- 003 6.9600e- 003 0.0000 18.5715 18.5715 6.0100e- 003 0.0000 18.7216 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 50 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 400
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 3.4000e004 2.4000e- 004 3.4900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 3.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.0016 1.0016 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.0094 Total 3.4000e004 2.4000e- 004 3.4900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 3.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.0016 1.0016 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.0094 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0285 0.2888 0.3194 5.1000e004 0.0144 0.0144 0.0133 0.0133 0.0000 45.0938 45.0938 0.0146 0.0000 45.4584 Total 0.0285 0.2888 0.3194 5.1000e004 0.0144 0.0144 0.0133 0.0133 0.0000 45.0938 45.0938 0.0146 0.0000 45.4584 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 51 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 401
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
- . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ; ; ; ;c;;; ;c;;;; . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.1000e004 0.0116 4.6400e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.9800e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.0400e- 003 5.7000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 6.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.6459 5.6459 3.4000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 5.8959 Worker 2.1600e003 1.5400e- 003 0.0223 7.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.4400e- 003 2.2300e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2700e- 003 0.0000 6.3853 6.3853 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 6.4350 Total 2.4700e003 0.0131 0.0269 1.3000e- 004 0.0104 1.0000e- 004 0.0105 2.8000e- 003 9.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 003 0.0000 12.0312 12.0312 4.9000e- 004 9.6000e- 004 12.3309 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0285 0.2888 0.3194 5.1000e004 0.0144 0.0144 0.0133 0.0133 0.0000 45.0937 45.0937 0.0146 0.0000 45.4584 Total 0.0285 0.2888 0.3194 5.1000e004 0.0144 0.0144 0.0133 0.0133 0.0000 45.0937 45.0937 0.0146 0.0000 45.4584 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 52 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 402
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
- . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ; ; ; ;c;;; ;c;;;; . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.1000e004 0.0116 4.6400e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.9800e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.0400e- 003 5.7000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 6.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.6459 5.6459 3.4000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 5.8959 Worker 2.1600e003 1.5400e- 003 0.0223 7.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.4400e- 003 2.2300e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2700e- 003 0.0000 6.3853 6.3853 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 6.4350 Total 2.4700e003 0.0131 0.0269 1.3000e- 004 0.0104 1.0000e- 004 0.0105 2.8000e- 003 9.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 003 0.0000 12.0312 12.0312 4.9000e- 004 9.6000e- 004 12.3309 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0625 0.6273 0.7421 1.2000e003 0.0297 0.0297 0.0273 0.0273 0.0000 105.2545 105.2545 0.0340 0.0000 106.1056 Total 0.0625 0.6273 0.7421 1.2000e003 0.0297 0.0297 0.0273 0.0273 0.0000 105.2545 105.2545 0.0340 0.0000 106.1056 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 53 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 403
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
- . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ; ; ; ;c;;; ;c;;;; . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.2000e004 0.0269 0.0108 1.3000e- 004 4.6300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.7700e- 003 1.3400e- 003 1.3000e- 004 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 12.9695 12.9695 7.9000e- 004 1.8700e- 003 13.5466 Worker 4.7400e003 3.2300e- 003 0.0484 1.6000e- 004 0.0196 1.0000e- 004 0.0197 5.2000e- 003 9.0000e- 005 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 14.4268 14.4268 3.1000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 14.5349 Total 5.4600e003 0.0301 0.0591 2.9000e- 004 0.0242 2.4000e- 004 0.0245 6.5400e- 003 2.2000e- 004 6.7600e- 003 0.0000 27.3963 27.3963 1.1000e- 003 2.2100e- 003 28.0815 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0625 0.6273 0.7421 1.2000e003 0.0297 0.0297 0.0273 0.0273 0.0000 105.2544 105.2544 0.0340 0.0000 106.1054 Total 0.0625 0.6273 0.7421 1.2000e003 0.0297 0.0297 0.0273 0.0273 0.0000 105.2544 105.2544 0.0340 0.0000 106.1054 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 54 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 404
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
- . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r----
- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ; ; ; ;c;;; ;c;;;; . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.2000e004 0.0269 0.0108 1.3000e- 004 4.6300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.7700e- 003 1.3400e- 003 1.3000e- 004 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 12.9695 12.9695 7.9000e- 004 1.8700e- 003 13.5466 Worker 4.7400e003 3.2300e- 003 0.0484 1.6000e- 004 0.0196 1.0000e- 004 0.0197 5.2000e- 003 9.0000e- 005 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 14.4268 14.4268 3.1000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 14.5349 Total 5.4600e003 0.0301 0.0591 2.9000e- 004 0.0242 2.4000e- 004 0.0245 6.5400e- 003 2.2000e- 004 6.7600e- 003 0.0000 27.3963 27.3963 1.1000e- 003 2.2100e- 003 28.0815 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 5.9000e003 0.0523 0.0703 1.1000e- 004 2.4300e- 003 2.4300e- 003 2.2700e- 003 2.2700e- 003 0.0000 9.4006 9.4006 2.7400e- 003 0.0000 9.4691 Paving 1.1800e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0800e003 0.0523 0.0703 1.1000e- 004 2.4300e- 003 2.4300e- 003 2.2700e- 003 2.2700e- 003 0.0000 9.4006 9.4006 2.7400e- 003 0.0000 9.4691 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 55 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 405
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.8000e004 3.3000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.9900e- 003 5.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.4548 1.4548 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.4657 Total 4.8000e004 3.3000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.9900e- 003 5.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.4548 1.4548 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.4657 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 5.9000e003 0.0523 0.0703 1.1000e- 004 2.4300e- 003 2.4300e- 003 2.2700e- 003 2.2700e- 003 0.0000 9.4006 9.4006 2.7400e- 003 0.0000 9.4691 Paving 1.1800e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0800e003 0.0523 0.0703 1.1000e- 004 2.4300e- 003 2.4300e- 003 2.2700e- 003 2.2700e- 003 0.0000 9.4006 9.4006 2.7400e- 003 0.0000 9.4691 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 56 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 406
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.8000e004 3.3000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.9900e- 003 5.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.4548 1.4548 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.4657 Total 4.8000e004 3.3000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.9900e- 003 5.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.4548 1.4548 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.4657 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 5.5600e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.8100e003 0.0122 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5569 Total 7.3700e003 0.0122 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5569 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 57 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 407
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 8.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2425 0.2425 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2443 Total 8.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2425 0.2425 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2443 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 5.5600e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.8100e003 0.0122 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5568 Total 7.3700e003 0.0122 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5568 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 58 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 408
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii iiC ii ii ii ii . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-----
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ---,..,_ __ ....
...---.---•------·------... --.... ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- • --~ - • --1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -~ - - - -1-----1 I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ -.. _.,_ __ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
-- --~ -- -----◄ I
I
I
I
I
I
- •• -~ - •• -1-----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - --~ - - --1----1
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiii
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 8.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2425 0.2425 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2443 Total 8.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2425 0.2425 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2443 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 59 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 409
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
- ----~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- .... • .... • .... . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .......................... I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ·---~----~---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I ----r----r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ; ; ; ;c;;; ;c;;;; . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0255 0.0338 0.5675 2.0300e003 0.2737 1.2100e- 003 0.2749 0.0727 1.1200e- 003 0.0738 0.0000 186.3202 186.3202 3.3400e- 003 3.9900e- 003 187.5943 Unmitigated 0.0255 0.0338 0.5675 2.0300e003 0.2737 1.2100e- 003 0.2749 0.0727 1.1200e- 003 0.0738 0.0000 186.3202 186.3202 3.3400e- 003 3.9900e- 003 187.5943
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Parking Lot 50.00 300.00 300.00 733,720 733,720
Total 50.00 300.00 300.00 733,720 733,720
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.689086 0.077411 0.233503 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 60 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 410
--
----t··-- 1
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ . ... I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----
' I
I
I
I
I
••• • L •• ••
'
----.. ---·----····· I -----
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- ' I
I
I
I
I
----~----
' I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ . ... I
I
I
I
I
I
----~ -- -- ' I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ .... I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----
' I
I
I
I
I
-.. -~ . ... I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----
' I
I
I
I
I
••• • L •• •• . . . ... . . . . '
----
'--
- ..
. ' --
- ..
··-
- -- - ..
---- - .__
1-- --
··-- 1-- ..
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4828 2.4828 2.1000e004 3.0000e- 005 2.4957 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4828 2.4828 2.1000e004 3.0000e- 005 2.4957 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGasUnmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 61 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 411
---
--- -~ --- -~ --- ·t ---- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
- - •• L -- •• L --• • L ••• •
' ' '
----.. ---~4444 ~4444 ~4444·····
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1 I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1 I I 1
----~ ----~ ----~ ---- I I 1
I I 1 I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I 1
- - •• L -- •• L --• • L ••• •
------ . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 62 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 412
----------
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 14000 2.4828 2.1000e004 3.0000e- 005 2.4957 Total 2.4828 2.1000e004 3.0000e- 005 2.4957
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 14000 2.4828 2.1000e004 3.0000e- 005 2.4957 Total 2.4828 2.1000e004 3.0000e- 005 2.4957
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 63 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 413
---
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 3.2600e003 1.0000e- 005 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.6400e- 003 Unmitigated 3.2600e003 1.0000e- 005 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.6400e- 003
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
5.6000e004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
2.5900e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.2000e004 1.0000e- 005 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.6400e- 003 Total 3.2700e003 1.0000e- 005 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.6400e- 003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 64 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 414
----t-··· I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
•••• L • ••• .
----· I ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- I
I
I
I
I
I
.
••••
. L •••• . .. . . . .
--------------
----~----~---------- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1----11 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~ ----~ ----1----11
----·----·---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~ ----~ ---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--- -r--- -r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--- -r--- -r---- I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I - - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - - I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
•••• I •••• I •••• . .............
6.2 Area by SubCategory
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
5.6000e004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
2.5900e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.2000e004 1.0000e- 005 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.6400e- 003 Total 3.2700e003 1.0000e- 005 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.6400e- 003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 65 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 415
----~----~----0-----<1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-
----~ ----~ ----t----t
----.. ---•----·----·---- I I ,1----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----►----►------- 1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----
~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----0-----<1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----t----t I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----t----1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
____ I I I ____ I ___ _
..............
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 66 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 416
-
--- -t -- - - I
I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
----~---- • I
I
I
I
I
.
•---
. . .. L .
••••
. . .
-
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr Mgal Land Use
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste8.0 Waste Detail
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category/Year
Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 67 of 69 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 417
-------
...., ______ ..._ ______ ..._ ______ ..,.
-----------
I I I t•
l 1 l
I I I ,, I
I I I ,, I I I I ,, I I I I ,, I
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr tons Land Use
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2
MT/yr tons Land Use
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Fuel Type Load Factor Horse Power Days/Year Hours/Day Number Equipment Type Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 68 of 69 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 418
J
I I I ,, I I I ,, ' I
I I I ,, I I I I ,, I I I I ,, I I I I ,, I I I I ,, I I I I ,, '
11.0 Vegetation
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 10/19/2022 3:34 PM Page 69 of 69 7179_ Richard T. Steed Memorial Park San Clemente project_Operational Mobile Source Only - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 419
APPENDICES
APPENDIX C
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION
420
U ltraSystems
1 n1• • •r ,or,
APPENDICES
421
U ltraSystems
1 n1• • •r ,or,
Elevation
Range
General
Distribution
Ambrosia pumila
San Diego
ambrosia (=dwarf
burr ambrosia)
FE, CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: perennial rhizomatous herbHabitats: creek beds, seasonally dry drainages, and floodplains, open habitats such as chaparral and coastal sage scrub in coarse substrates Soils: alkaline soils, sparse grasslands or marginal wetland habitatsWetlands, Drainages, or Seeps: YesBloom Period: April to October 66 – 1,361 Yes Yes Yes
Moderate potential to occur. There is a dry
creekbed in the northeast corner of the BSA. In
addition, the eastern segment of the BSA provides
suitable habitat to support this species, such as
coastal sage scrub.
Eryngium
aristulatum var.
parishii
San Diego buttoncelery FE, SE, CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: annual/perennial herbHabitats: moist depressions surrounded by coastal scrub chaparral, and valley and foothill grasslandsSoils: vernal pools and moist clay depressions in poorly-drained adobe soil grasslandsWetlands, Drainages, or Seeps: YesBloom Period: April to June 66 – 2,034 No Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. There are areas in the
BSA and on the project site that provide suitable
habitat to support this species such as coastal sage
scrub and foothill grasslands. However, the soils of
the BSA are not poorly drained and therefore this
species was determined to have only a low
potential to occur.
Baccharis
vanessae
Encinitas
baccharis
(=Encitias
falsewillow)
FT, SE, CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: perennial deciduous shrubHabitats: steep slopes usually in sandstone and volcanic substratesSoils: chaparral remnants in relictual Torrey Pine forests Bloom Period: August to November 197 – 2,362 No Yes Yes
Moderate potential to occur. The eastern
segment of the BSA contains slopes. In addition,
there are recent (<15 years) observations of this
species within a 10-mile radius of the BSA.
Verbesina dissita
big-leaved
crownbeard
(=crown-beard)
FT, ST, CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: perennial herb Habitats: steep, rocky, north-facing slopes within 1.5 miles of the ocean in gravelly soils of southern maritime chaparral (90%) and coastal sage scrub (10%) plant communitiesBloom Period: March to July 148 - 672 Yes Yes Yes
Not expected to occur. The BSA is >1.5 miles
from the ocean and does not contain sufficient
north-facing rocky slopes, which are conditions
required to support this species.
Dudleya
stolonifera
Laguna Beach
dudleya FT, ST, CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: perennial stoloniferous herb Habitats: thin, rocky sedimentary soil (some < ½ inch deep) on sandstone cliffs on steep canyon walls, Found in chaparral, cismontane woodlands, coastal scrub, and valley and foothill grasslands Bloom Period: May to July 33 - 853 No Yes Yes No potential to occur. The BSA does not contain suitable soils to support this species.
Brodiaea filifolia
thread-leaved
brodiaea
(=threadleaf
clusterlily)
FT, SE, CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: perennial bulbiferous herbHabitats: gentle hillsides, valleys, and floodplains in semi-alkaline mudflats, vernal pools, mesic southern needlegrass grasslands, mixed native-nonnative grasslands and alkali grasslands plant communities Soils: clay to fine sandBloom Period: March to June 82 – 3,674 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur onsite, High potential to
occur in BSA. The soils of the BSA contain clay,
creating suitable substrate for this species. There
are recent observations (<15 years) of this species
within a .5-mile radius of the BSA. In addition, the
BSA contains gentle hillsides, a feature preferred
by this species.
Centromadia
parryi ssp.
australis
(=Hemizonia
parryi ssp.
australis)
southern tarplant CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: margins of marshes and swamps, and in vernally mesic sites within valley and foothill grasslands and vernal poolsBloom Period: May to November 0 – 1,574 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The eastern segment of
the BSA contains foothill grasslands, however
there are no marshes or swamps present in the
BSA; which are typically suitable conditions to
support this species.
Listed Endangered, Threatened, Candidate and State Rare Plants: Plants with official status under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), and/or the Native Plant Protection Act (NPPA). A species may have other sensitive designations in addition to their federal or state listing.
BSA is Located Within the
Plant Species’ Known:
Potential For Occurrence in the BSA Scientific Name (=Synonym) Common Name (=Synonym) Status General Habitat Description in California Plant Elevation Range (feet amsl) BSA Contains
Potential
Suitable
Habitats
Sensitive Plants: These plants have no official status under the ESA, the CESA, and/or the NPPA; however they are designated as sensitive or locally important by federal agencies, state agencies, and/or local conservation agencies and organizations. 422
Chaenactis
glabriuscula var.
orcuttiana
Orcutt’s
pincushion
(=Orcutt’s yellow
pincushion)
CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: sandy sites in coastal bluff scrub and coastal dunesBloom Period: January to August 0 – 328 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The soils of the BSA are
not optimal to support this species, as they contain
clay-loam with a smaller sand faction and the BSA
does not contain coastal dunes. This species
typically prefers soils that are primarily sandy.
However, there are recent (<15 years)
observations of this species within a 10-mile
radius of the project.
Isocoma menziesii
var. decumbens
decumbent
goldenbush CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: perennial shrubHabitats: low-lying alkali habitats along the coast and in inland valleysSoils: alkali scrub, alkali playas, vernal pools, and, alkali grasslands Bloom Period: April to November 33 - 443 Yes Yes Yes
High potential to occur. There are recent
observations (<15 years) of this species within a 2-
mile radius of the project. The BSA and project site
provide suitable coastal sage scrub habitat to
support this species.
Pentachaeta
aurea ssp. allenii
Allen’s
pentachaeta CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: valley and foothill grasslands, chaparral, cismontane woodlands, riparian woodlands, coastal sage scrub, and lower montane coniferous forestsSoils: dry, open or grassy areas and is often associated with clay substratesWetlands, Drainages, or Seeps: YesBloom Period: March to June 246 – 1,706 Yes Yes Yes
Moderate potential to occur. There are few
observations of this species within a 10-mile
radius of the BSA. The nearest recent (<20 years)
observation of this species is mapped in
approximately 7 miles from the project area.
However, the project site and BSA contain coastal
sage scrub in the northern and eastern segments
with clay soils, which create suitable habitat to
support this species.
Pseudognaphaliu
m leucocephalum
(=Gnaphalium
leucocephalum)
white rabbittobacco CRPR: 2B.2
Lifeform: perennial herbHabitats: chaparral, cismontane woodlands, coastal scrub and riparian woodlands; sandy or gravelly benches, dry stream bottoms, canyon bottomsSoils: sandy and gravelly sitesBloom Period: (July) August to November (December) 0 – 6,888 Yes Yes Yes
Moderate potential to occur. There is a mapped
streambed in the northeastern portion of the BSA. This area provides suitable habitat to support this species (coastal sage scrub and foothill
grasslands).
Senecio
aphanactis
chaparral ragwort
(=rayless
ragwort)
CRPR: 2B.2
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: rocky limestone slopes and washes in pinyon and juniper woodlands (carbonate)Bloom Period: January to April (May) 49 – 2,624 Yes Yes Yes
Moderate potential to occur. There are recent
(<15 years) occurrences of this species within a 2-
mile radius of the project. The BSA does not
contain pinyon and juniper woodlands, and
therefore was determined to have a moderate
potential to occur.
Harpagonella
palmeri
(=Pectocarya
palmeri)
Palmer's
grapplinghook CRPR: 4.2
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: open coastal sage scrub, chaparral, valley and foothill grasslands, and scrub oak woodlandsSoils: clay and cobbly clay soils Bloom Period: March to May 66 – 3,133 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The BSA contains
suitable soils (clay), and there is coastal sage scrub
in the eastern and northern segments which is a
suitable habitat for this species.
Lepidium
virginicum var.
robinsonii
Robinson’s peppergrass CRPR: 4.3
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: chaparral and coastal sage scrub often around rock outcropsSoils: dry soilsBloom Period: January to July 3 – 2,903 Yes Yes Yes
Moderate potential to occur. The eastern
segment of the BSA contains coastal sage scrub,
which is a suitable habitat type for this species.
Aphanisma
blitoides aphanisma CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes, and coastal scrubSoils: sandy soils Bloom Period: February to June 3 – 1,000 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur in BSA, no potential to
occur on project site. The BSA contains coastal
scrub, however the soils of the BSA contain clays
and are not primarily sandy.
423
Atriplex coulteri Coulter’s saltbush CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: perennial herbHabitats: coastal bluff scrub; on coastal dunes; and on ridge topsSoils: clay soils and alkaline low placesBloom Period: March to October 10 – 1,508 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The soils of the BSA are
suitable to support this species; however the BSA
lacks ridge tops and coastal bluffs. The project site
is primarily developed with existing facilities and
also contains disturbed areas and therefore offers
no potential suitable haitat to support this species.
Atriplex pacifica South Coast saltscale CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: oastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, chenopod scrub and playasSoils: alkaline soilsBloom Period: March to October 0 - 459 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The BSA contains coastal
scrub, however the it lacks dunes, which would
create optimal habitat for this species.
Suaeda esteroa estuary seablite CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: perennial fleshy herb Habitats: coastal salt marshes and swamps often growing with Salicornia subterminalisBloom Period: May to January 0 - 16 No No Yes
Not expected to occur. While the BSA is relatively
proximal to the coast, the BSA lacks salt marshes
and swamps. It is likely that the areas in the BSA
do not contain sufficient moisture to support this
species. In addition, this species occurs in areas at
sea level. Thsi elevation of the BSA is higher than
the elevation range at which this species occurs.
Dudleya
blochmaniae ssp.
blochmaniae
Blochman’s
dudleya CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: perennial herbHabitats: valley/foothill grasslands, coastal bluff scrub, chaparral and coastal scrub Soils: open, rocky slopes, often serpentine or clay-dominatedBloom Period: April to June 16 – 1,476 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The soils of the BSA are
suitable (clay) and slopes to support this species.
The project site is primarily developed with
existing facilities and also contains disturbed areas
and therefore offers no potential suitable haitat to
support this species.
Dudleya
multicaulis
many-stemmed
dudleya CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: perennial herbHabitats: barrens, rocky places, and ridgelines as well as thinly vegetated openings in chaparral, valley and foothill grasslands, and coastal sage scrubSoils: clay soils, heavy soils, often clayBloom Period: April to July 49 – 2,591 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The eastern segment of
the BSA contains valley and foothill grasslands
and coastal sage scrub, which create suitable
habitat for this species.
Dudleya viscida
sticky dudleya
(=sticky-leaved
dudleya)
CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: perennial herbHabitats: coastal bluff scrub, chaparral, cismontane woodlands, and coastal scrub, mesic, mostly north-facing, and often steep, rocky canyon slopesSoils: exposed gabbroic rock or in very shallow soils and cracks Bloom Period: May to June 33 – 1,804 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur in the BSA. A portion of
the BSA contains coastal scrub on sloping ground,
which creates the low potential to this species to
occur.
Comarostaphylis
diversifolia ssp.
diversifolia
summer holly CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: perennial evergreen shrubHabitats:mixed chaparral and cismontane woodlandsBloom Period: April to June 98 – 2,591 Yes Yes Yes Not expected to occur. The BSA lacks suitable habitat types to support this species.
Euphorbia misera cliff spurge CRPR: 2B.2
Lifeform: perennial shrubHabitats: Mojavean desert scrub, coastal bluff scrub, and coastal scrubSoils: rocky sitesBloom Period: December to October 33 – 1,640 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The BSA contains coastal
scrub, however the BSA does not contain
particularly rocky soils; the soils of the BSA are
primarily clay-loam.
Clinopodium
chandleri
(=Satureja
chandleri and
=Calamintha
chandleri)
San Miguel savory CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: perennial shrubHabitats: chaparral, cismontane woodlands, coastal scrub, riparian woodlands, and valley and foothill grasslandsBloom Period: March to July
394 – 3,526 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur in the BSA. The eastern
segment of the BSA contains suitable habitat to
support this species such as coastal sage scrub
and foothill grasslands.
Monardella
hypoleuca ssp.
intermedia
intermediate
monardella CRPR: 1B.3
Lifeform: perennial rhizomatous herbHabitats: understory of chaparral, cismontane woodlands, and lower montane coniferous forests Bloom Period: April to September
1,312 – 4,100 No No Yes
No potential to occur. The BSA does not contain
suitable habitats to support this species, including
understory of chaparral, cismontane woodlands,
and lower montane coniferous forests.
Sidalcea
neomexicana
salt spring
checkerbloom
(=mountain
sidalcea)
CRPR: 2B.2
Lifeform: perennial herbHabitats: alkaline, mesic sites in chaparral, coastal scrub, lower montane coniferous forests, Mojavean desert scrub, alkali playas, and brackish marshesBloom Period: March to June 49 – 5,018 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. A portion of the BSA
contains coastal scrub, however it lacks many of
the preferred habitat types of this species.
424
Nama stenocarpa mud nama CRPR: 2B.2
Lifeform: annual/perennial herbHabitats: Marshes and swamps (lake margins, riverbanks)Bloom Period: January to July 16 - 1,640 No Yes Yes
No potential to occur. The BSA does not contain
features preferable to this species, such as lake
margins and riverbanks.
Navarretia
prostrata
prostrate vernal
pool navarretia
(=prostrate
navarretia)
CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: coastal scrub, valley and foothill grasslands (alkaline washes), meadows and seeps, and vernal poolsWetlands, Drainages, or Seeps: YesBloom Period: April to July 49 – 3,969 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The eastern segment of
the BSA provides suitable habitat to support this
species such as coastal scrub.
Chorizanthe
polygonoides var.
longispina
long-spined
spineflower
(=knotweed
spineflower)
CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: ernal pools, meadows and seeps, valley and foothill grasslands, and openings in coastal scrub, and chaparralSoils: heavy, often rocky, clay soilsWetlands, Drainages, or Seeps: YesBloom Period: April to July 98 – 5,018 Yes Yes Yes
Moderate potential to occur. The eastern
segment of the BSA contains coastal scrub, and
therefore provides sutable habitat to support this
species.
Myosurus
minimus ssp. apus little mousetail CRPR: 3.1
Lifeform: annual herbHabitats: alkaline vernal pools and in valley and foothill grasslands, alkali annual grasslands componentsBloom Period: March to June 66 – 2,099 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The eastern segment of
the BSA contains some foothill grasslands, which
create suitable habitat to support this species.
Horkelia cuneata
var. puberula
(=Horkelia
cuneata ssp.
puperula)
mesa horkelia CRPR: 1B.1
Lifeform: perennial herbHabitats: maritime chaparral, coastal scrub, and cismontane woodlandsSoils: sandy or gravelly sites Bloom Period: February to September 230 – 2,657 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The BSA contains coastal
scrub, however the soils of the BSA are primarily
clay-loam, and this species typically prefers soils
with a higher sand faction than is present in the
BSA.
Calochortus
weedii var.
intermedius
intermediate mariposa lily
(=Weeds
mariposa lily)
CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: perennial bulbiferous herb Habitats: dry, rocky open slopes and rock outcrops in coastal scrub and chaparralBloom Period: May to July 344 – 2,804 Yes Yes Yes
Moderate potential to occur. The eastern
segment of the BSA contains rocky slopes with
coastal sage scrub, therefore creating suitable
habitat to support this species.
Imperata
brevifolia California satintail CRPR: 2B.1
Lifeform: perennial rhizomatous herbHabitats: mesic sites within chaparral, coastal scrub, Mojavean desert scrub, meadows and seeps (often alkali), and riparian scrubWetlands, Drainages, or Seeps: YesBloom Period: September to May 0 – 3,985 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The BSA contains coastal
scrub in the eastern segment, and therefore
provides suitable habtat to support this species.
However, recorded observations of this species
are >20 years old.
Nolina
cismontana
chaparral nolina
(=Peninsular
nolina and
=California
beargrass)
CRPR: 1B.2
Lifeform: perennial evergreen shrub Habitats: chaparral and coastal scrubSoils: sandstone or gabbro soilsBloom Period: March to July 459 – 4,182 Yes Yes Yes
Low potential to occur. The BSA does contain
some coastal scrub which provides suitable
habitat to support this species, however recorded
obsevations of this species within a 10-mile radius
of the project are >20 years old.
Legend and Notes
Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) Listing Codes: the ESA is administered by the USFWS and NMFS. The USFWS has primary responsibility for terrestrial and freshwater organisms, while the responsibilities of NMFS are mainly marine wildlife such as whales and anadromous fish such as salmon. For the purposes of the ESA, Congress defined species to include subspecies, varieties, and, for vertebrates, distinct population segments. The official federal listing of Endangered and Threatened plants is published in 50 CFR § 17.12.• FE = federally listed as endangered: any species of plant or animal that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of their range.• FT = federally listed as threatened: any species of plant or animal that is considered likely to become endangered throughout all or a significant portion of its range within the foreseeable future. • FC = federal candidate for listing: candidate species are plants and animals for which the USFWS has sufficient information on their biological status and threats to propose them for listing as endangered or threatened under the ESA, but for which development of a proposed listing regulation is precluded by higher priority listing actions to address species in greater need. A proposed regulation has not yet been published in the Federal Register for these species.California Endangered Species Act (CESA) and California Native Plant Protection Act (NPPA) Listing Codes: tth e CESA and NPPA are administered by CDFW. The official listing of Plants of California Declared to Be Endangered, Threatened or Rare is contained in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, § 670.2. Species, subspecies and varieties of California native plants are declared to be endangered, threatened as defined by § 2062 and § 2067 of the Fish and Game Code or rare as defined by § 1901 of the Fish and Game Code.• SE = state-listed as endangered: "endangered species" means a native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant which is in serious danger of becoming extinct throughout all, or a significant portion, of its range due to one or more causes, including loss of habitat, change in habitat, overexploitation, predation, competition, or disease (Fish and Game Code § 2062). • ST = state-listed as threatened: "threatened species" means a native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant that, although not presently threatened with extinction, is likely to become an endangered species in the foreseeable future in the absence of the special protection and management efforts (Fish and Game Code § 2067).• SCE = state candidate for listing as endangered: a native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant that the Fish and Game Commission has formally noticed published in the California Regulatory Notice Register as being under review by CDFW for addition to the list of endangered species, or a species for which the Fish and Game Commission has published a notice of proposed regulation to add the species to the list (Fish and Game Code § 2068). 425
Resources
• The Jepson Desert Manual (Baldwin et al., 2002);• The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, second edition (Baldwin et al., 2012);• BLM Special Status Plants under the jurisdiction of the California State Office as of October 30, 2013 (BLM, 2013);• The Final Environmental Impact Report and Statement (Final EIR/S) for the West Mojave Plan (BLM, 2005);• Final Environmental Impact Statement. Proposed Northern and Eastern Colorado Desert Coordinated Management Plan (NECO) (BLM and CDFG, 2002);• (Calflora website );• The Status of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants and Animals of California, 2000–2004 (CDFG, 2005);• CNDDB ;• Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List (CDFW, 2016);• State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California (CDFW, 2016);• (CNPS website );• (eFloras.org website );• (NatureServe Explorer website );• Rare Plants of San Diego County (Reiser, 2001);• USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Sensitive Plant Species List by Forest (USFS, 2013).Notes:The BSA contains approximate elevations of 381 to 768 feet above mean sea level (amsl).Yes = the BSA is located within the plant sp• UltraSystems in-house records. ecies’ known distribution, elevation range, and/or the BSA contains suitable habitats and/or soils to support the plant species. The plant species has a potential to occur within the BSA. Further evaluation is needed.
No = the BSA is located outside the plant species’ known distribution, elevation range, and/or the BSA lacks suitable habitats and/or soils to support the plant species. It is highly unlikely for the plant species to have a potential to occur within the BSA. No further evaluation is needed.
Present = observed within the BSA during surveys.A CNPS elevation range is provided for each taxon in feet. The stated range is for the California portion of a plant's range only (if the taxon also occurs outside the state). These CNPS elevation range data are accumulated from literature, herbarium specimens, and field survey information.
California Rare Plant Ranks (Formerly known as CNPS Lists): the CNPS is a statewide, nonprofit organization that maintains, with CDFW, an Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California. In the spring of 2011, CNPS and CDFW officially changed the name “CNPS List” or “CNPS Ranks” to “California Rare Plant Rank” (or CPRP). This was done to reduce confusion over the fact that CNPS and CDFW jointly manage the Rare Plant Status Review Groups and the rank assignments are the product of a collaborative effort and not solely a CNPS assignment. • CRPR: 1A = California Rare Plant Rank 1A - plants presumed extirpated in California and either rare or extinct elsewhere: the plants with a CRPA of 1A are presumed extirpated because they have not been seen or collected in the wild in California for many years. This rank includes plants that are both presumed extinct as well as those plants which are presumed extirpated in California. All of the plants constituting CRPR 1A meet the definitions of § 2062 and § 2067 (CESA) of the Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. Should these taxa be rediscovered, it is mandatory that they be fully considered during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.• CRPR 1B = California Rare Plant Rank 1B - plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere: plants with a CRPR of 1B are rare throughout their range with the majority of them endemic to California. Most of the plants that are ranked 1B have declined significantly over the last century. All of the plants constituting CRPR 1B meet the definitions of § 2062 and § 2067 (CESA) of the Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. It is mandatory that they be fully considered during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.• CRPR 2A = California Rare Plant Rank 2A - plants presumed extirpated in California, but more common elsewhere: the plant taxa of CRPR 2A are presumed extirpated because they have not been observed or documented in California for many years. This list includes only those plant taxa that are presumed extirpated in California, but more common elsewhere in their range. All of the plants on List 2A meet the definitions of § 2062 and § 2067 (CESA) of the Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. Should these taxa be rediscovered, it is mandatory that they be fully considered during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.• CRPR 2B = California Rare Plant Rank 2B - plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere: except for being common beyond the boundaries of California, plants with a CRPR of 2B would have been ranked 1B. From the federal perspective, plants common in other states or countries are not eligible for consideration under the provisions of the ESA. All of the plants constituting CRPR 2B meet the definitions of § 2062 and § 2067 (CESA) of the Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. It is mandatory that they be fully considered during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.• CRPR 3 = California Rare Plant Rank 3 - plants about which more information is needed - a review list: the plants that comprise CRPR 3 are united by one common theme – CNPS and CDFW lack the necessary information to assign them to one of the other ranks or to reject them. Nearly all of the plants constituting CRPR 3 are taxonomically problematic. Some of the plants constituting CRPR 3 meet the definitions of § 2062 and § 2067 (CESA) of the Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. CNPS strongly recommends that CRPR 3 plants be evaluated for consideration during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.• CRPR 4 = California Rare Plant Rank 4 - plants of limited distribution - a watch list: the plants in this category are of limited distribution or infrequent throughout a broader area in California. While CNPS and CDFW cannot call these plants "rare" from a statewide perspective, they are uncommon enough that their status should be monitored regularly. Should the degree of endangerment or rarity of a CRPR 4 plant change, CNPS and CDFW will transfer it to a more appropriate rank. Some of the plants constituting CRPR 4 meet the definitions of § 2062 and § 2067 (CESA) of the Fish and Game Code, and few, if any, are eligible for state listing. Nevertheless, many of them are significant locally, and CNPS strongly recommends that CRPR 4 plants be evaluated for consideration during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.
California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Threat Ranks: The CNPS Threat Rank is an extension added onto the California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) (as a decimal code) and designates the level of threats by a 1 to 3 ranking with 1 being the most threatened and 3 being the least threatened. A Threat Rank is present for all CRPR 1B's, 2B's, 4's, and the majority of CRPR 3's. CRPR 4 plants are seldom assigned a Threat Rank of .1, as they generally have large enough populations to not have significant threats to their continued existence in California; however, certain conditions exist to make the plant a species of concern and hence be assigned a CRPR. In addition, all CRPR 1A and 2A (presumed extirpated in California), and some CRPR 3 (need more information) plants, which lack threat information, do not have a Threat Rank extension. • .1 = seriously threatened in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened / high degree and immediacy of threat)• .2 = moderately threatened in California (20-80% occurrences threatened / moderate degree and immediacy of threat) • .3 = not very threatened in California (<20% of occurrences threatened / low degree and immediacy of threat or no current threats known) 426
Located
Within
Species’
Distribution
and/or
Elevation
Range (if
known)
Contains
Suitable
Foraging, Roosting,
and/or
Breeding
Habitats
Branchinecta
sandiegonensis
ǣǡǡ
ʹͳʹ
ͳͲʹͲ̹ǡ
Low potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Streptocephalus woottoni
ǣǡǦǡ
ǡǡ ǡ ͵Ͳ
ǡ Low potential to occur.
Ǥ
Bombus crotchii
ǣǤ
Ǥǡǡǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǡǡ
ǣ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
Moderate potential to occur.
Ǥ
Ǥ
Oncorhynchus mykiss
irideus Ȃ ǡ ǣ
ǡ
ǡǦ
ǣǦ No potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Eucyclogobius newberryi ǡ
ǣ
ǡǡ
ǡ
ǣǡ
No potential to occur.
Ǥ
Anaxyrus californicus
(=Bufo californicus) ǡ
ǣǡǡǡǡ
ǣ
ǡ
ǡ
No potential to occur.
Ǥ ǡ
Ǥ
Ǣ
Ǥ
Rallus obsoletus levipes
(=Rallus longirostris
levipes)
ǦȋαǦ
Ȍ ǡǡ
ǣ
ǡǡ
ǣ No potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Sternula antillarum browni
(=Sterna antillarum
browni)
ǡǡ
ǣ
ǣǡ
ǡ
ǣǡǡ No potential to occurǤ
Ȁ
Ǥ
ʹǤͷ
Ǣ
Ǥ
Coccyzus americanus
occidentalis Ǧ
ǡǡ
ǣ
ǣ
ǡ
ͷͲ
ǡ
ͳͲͲ
Not expected to occurǤ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǧ ǡ
Ǥ
Empidonax traillii extimus
ǡǡ
ǣ
ǣ
ǡǡǡ
ǡ
ǡ ǡ
Ǣ
Low potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
ǡǤ
ǡͳ Ǥ
Vireo bellii pusillus ǯ ǡǡ ǣ
ǣǡǡȋǤȌ
ǡǦ Ǧǡǡ
Low potential to occur.
ȋȌǡ
Ǥ
Riparia riparia ǡ
ǣ
ǣǡǡ
ǣǦ
ǡ
ǡ
Not expected to occurǤ
ǡ
ǡǡǤ
Polioptila californica
californica
ǡ
ǣǡǦǡ
ǡǡǦǡ
Moderate potential to occur.
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
Agelaius tricolor
ǡǡǡ
ǣ
ǣǡǡ ȋǤȌǡǡǡ
ǣ
ǡ
Not expected to occurǤ
Ǥ
Dipodomys stephensi ǯ ǡ
ǣ
ǣǡ
Low potential to occur.
ȋǦ
ǦȌ
Ǥ
Perognathus longimembris
pacificus
ǡ
ǣǡǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǣǦǡ
Low potential to occurǤ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
Danaus plexippus Ǥͳ
ǣ
ǣǦ
ȋ
ȏ
ǤȐǡȏȐǡ
Ȍǡ
Low potential to occurǤ
ǡ
Ǥ
Gila orcuttii
ǣǦ
ȋͳͲǦʹͶȌ
No potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Rana boylii Ǧ
ǣǡ
ǡǡ
ǡ
ǦǡǦǦ ǡǦǡȋȌǡ ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
ǣǦ
No potential to occur.
ǡ
ǡǤ
ǡ
Ǥ
Spea hammondii
ǣ
ǡ
ǡǦǡȀ
ǣ
ͳ
Moderate potential to occurǤ
ǡ
Ǥ
Actinemys marmorata
(=Actinemys marmorata
marmorata) (=Emys
marmorata)
ȋα
Ȍ
ǣǦ
ǡǡǡǡǡ
ǡǡ
ǡ ǡ
ǡǡǡ No potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Sensitive Invertebrates
Sensitive Amphibians
Sensitive Fish
Listed Amphibians
Listed Fish
Sensitive Reptiles
Listed Mammals
Listed Birds
Potential For Occurrence in the BSA Scientific Name (=Synonym) Common Name (=Synonym) Status General Habitat Descriptions in California The BSA:
Listed Invertebrates
Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Candidate Wildlife: Wildlife with official status under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and/or the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). A species may have other sensitive designations in addition to their federal or state listing.
Sensitive Wildlife: These animals have no official status under the ESA and/or the CESA; however they are designated as sensitive or locally important by federal agencies, state agencies, and/or local conservation agencies and organizations 427
Located
Within
Species’
Distribution
and/or
Elevation
Range (if
known)
Contains
Suitable
Foraging, Roosting,
and/or
Breeding
Habitats
Potential For Occurrence in the BSA Scientific Name (=Synonym) Common Name (=Synonym) Status General Habitat Descriptions in California The BSA:
Phrynosoma blainvilli
(=Phrynosoma coronatum)
(=Phrynosoma coronatum
blainvillei)
ǯȋα
Ȍ
ȋαȌ
ǣ
ǡǡ
ǡǡ
ǡǡ Ǣ
Ǣ
Low potential to occurǤ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
Plestiodon skiltonianus
interparietalis ȋα
Ȍ
ǣǡ
ǡǦǦǡǦǡ ǡ
ǣ
No potential to occurǤ
Ǣ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Aspidoscelis hyperythra
(=Cnemidophorus
hyperythrus beldingi)
Ǧ
ǣǦ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǡ
ǣ
Low potential to occur.
Ǥ
ǡ
ͳͲǦ
εʹͲǤ
Aspidoscelis tigris
stejnegeri
(=Cnemidophorus tigris
multiscutatus)
ȋα
Ȍ
ǣ
ǡ ǡ
ǡǡ
ǣǡǡ
No potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Crotalus ruber ǡ
ǣǡ
ȋͶǡͲͲͲȌǡǡ
ǣǡ
Moderate potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Thamnophis hammondii Ǧ
ǣ
ǡǦ ǡ ǡ
Not expected to occur.
ǡǡ Ǥ Pelecanus occidentalis
californicus
ǡ
ǣ
ǣ
ǡ
ȋȌ
ǣ
No potential to occurǤ
ǡǡ Ȁ
Ǥ
Ardea herodias
ǣ
ǣǡ ǡ
ǡǡ
ǣ
Low potential to occur.
ǡ
Ǥ Ǥ
Ardea alba
ǣ
ǣǡǡǡǦǡǡ
ǣ
Low potential to occur.
ǡ
Ǥ
ȀǤ
ǡ Ǥ Nycticorax nycticorax
Ǧ
Ǧ
ǣ
ǡǡǡǡ
ǣȀ
Not expected to occur. ǡǡ ǡǡ Pandion haliaetus ǡ
ǣ
ǣǡǡǡǡǡǡǡ
ǣͳǡ͵ͳʹǦ
Low potential to occur.
ǡ
ʹǤͷǤ
ǡ Ǥ
Elanus leucurus Ǧ
ǡ
ǣ
ǣǡǡǡǡǡ ǡǡ
ǣ
Moderate potential to occur.
ǡ
Ǥ
Accipiter cooperii ̵ ǡ
ǣ
ǣ
ǣ
Ȁ
High potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Aquila chrysaetos
ǡǡǡ
ǣ
ǣ
ǡ
ǡǡǡǡ ǡǡǡ
ǡǡǡ
ǣ
ǡ
Low potential to occurǤ
Ǣ
Charadrius montanus ǡǡ ǣ
ǣǦ ǡ
ǡ ǡ
ǣǡǡǡ
Low potential to occurǤǤ ǯ
ȀǤ
Ǥ
Larus californicus
ǣ
ǣ
ǡǡ
ǡ
ǡ
ǣ
No potential to occur.
Ǥ
Ǥ
Hydroprogne caspia
(=Sterna caspia)
ǣǡǡǡ
ǡǡ
ǣ
ǡ
No potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Thalasseus elegans
(=Sterna elegans)
ǣ
ǣ
ǡǡǡǢ
ǡ
ǣ
No potential to occur.
Ǥ
ǡʹǤͷ Ǥ
Athene cunicularia
ǡǡ
ǣ
ǣǡǡ
ǣ
Moderate potential to occurǤ Ǥ
Ǥ
Asio otus Ǧ
ǣ
ǣ
ǡǡǡǦǡ
ǣǦ
Low potential to occur.
ǡ
Ǥ
Calypte costae ̵
ǣ
ǡǡǡ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡǦ
ǡ
ǣ
ǡ
ǡǡ
Moderate potential to occurǤ
Ǥ Selasphorus rufus
ǣǡǡ
ǡǡ
Ǧ
ǡ
ǡǡǡ
ǡ
ǡ
Moderate potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Selasphorus sasin ̵
ǣ
ǣ
Moderate potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Dryobates nuttallii (=
Picoides nuttallii) ̵
ǣǦȋ
Ȍǡ
ȋ
Ȍ
ǣ
Low potential to occurǤ Ǥ
Falco columbarius ǡ
ǣ
ǣǡǡ Ǧ ǡ
ǡǡǡǡ
ǣ
Low potential to occur.
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Falco peregrinus anatum
ǡǡ
ǣǡ
ǡǡ
ǡǡǡǡǡ ǡ
ǣ
ǦǡǦǦ
Low potential to occurǤ ǡ
Ǥ Sensitive Birds
428
Located
Within
Species’
Distribution
and/or
Elevation
Range (if
known)
Contains
Suitable
Foraging, Roosting,
and/or
Breeding
Habitats
Potential For Occurrence in the BSA Scientific Name (=Synonym) Common Name (=Synonym) Status General Habitat Descriptions in California The BSA:
Lanius ludovicianus ǡǡ ǣ
ǣ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡǡǡ
ǡ
ǡ ǡǡ
ǡǡ
ǡǡ
ǣ
Moderate potential to occurǤ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Eremophila alpestris actia
ǣ
Ǧ
ǣ
Low potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Campylorhynchus
brunneicapillus
sandiegensis
ȋα
Ȍ ǡ
ǣ
ǣǡ
Low potential to occur in the BSA, not expected to occur on the project site.
Ǥ
Aimophila ruficeps
canescens Ǧ
ǣǡǡ ǡ
ǡ
ǣ
High potential to occur.
Ǥ
Chaetodipus californicus
femoralis
ȋα
Ȍ
ǣ
ǡ
ǡ
ǣ
Moderate potential to occurǡ
ǤǤ
Ǣ
ǡ
Ǥ
Chaetodipus fallax fallax
ǣǡǦ
ǣ
Ǧ
Low potential to occurǤ Ǥ ȋǦȌ Ǥ
Chaetodipus fallax pallidus
ǣ
ǡ
ǣ
Moderate potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Choeronycteris mexicana
Ǧ
ǣǡǡǡ ǡ
ǣ
ǡǡ
Not expected to occur.
Ǥ
ǡ
ͳͲǦ
εʹͲ
Ǥ
Eumops perotis
californicus ǡ
ǣ
ǡ
ǣǦǡǡǡ ǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǡǤ
ǡǡǡ
ǣ
Low potential to occur in the BSA, not expected to occur on the project siteǤ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
Nyctinomops femorosaccus
Ǧ
ǣǦǡ
ǡ
ǡǡǡ ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
ǣ
Not expected to occur.
Ǧ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡǡǡ
ǡ
ǡ
Lasiurus cinereus
ǣ
ǡ ǡ
ǣ
Low potential to occurǤ Ǥ
Lasiurus xanthinus ǡ
ǣ
ǣǡǡǡ
ǣ
Ǧ
Not expected to occurǤǡ
Ǥ
Antrozous pallidus
ǣ
ǡ
ǡǡǡǡ
ǣǡ
Low potential to occur.
ǯ
ǡǢ ǡ
ǡǡ
Ǥ
Myotis yumanensis
ȋα
Ȍ
ǣ
ǣ
Not expected to occur.
Ǥ
Ǥ
Puma concolor ȋα
Ȍ ȋȀȌ ǡ
ȚȚͶͺͲͲȂͶͺͳͲ
ǣ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǣ
ǡ
ǡ
Moderate potential to occurǤ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Taxidea taxus
ǣ
ǣǦ
ǡǡǡ
Not expected to occur.
ǡ
Ǥ
Sensitive Mammals
429
APPENDICES
430
U ltraSystems
1 n1• • •r ,or,
1 Table 1 contains the list of vascular plant taxa recorded during the biological field survey conducted within the BSA. Plant nomenclature and taxonomic order is based on The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, second Edition (Baldwin et al., 2012), and/or the Calflora website (Calflora, 2022).
Table 1
Plant Species Observed during the Field Surveys
Scientific Name Common Name Cal-IPC Rating
DICOTS
Anacardiaceae Cashew/Sumac Family
Malosma laurina laurel sumac
Rhus integrifolia lemonade berry
Rhus ovata sugar bush
Schinus molle* Peruvian pepper tree Cal-IPC: limited
Schinus terebinthifolius* Brazilian pepper tree Cal-IPC: limited
Apocynaceae Dogbane Family
Vinca major* greater periwinkle Cal-IPC: moderate
Asteraceae (=Compositae) Sunflower Family
Artemisia californica California sagebrush
Encelia californica California sunflower
Baccharis pilularis* coyote brush
Heterotheca grandiflora telegraph weed
Cirsium vulgare* bull thistle Cal-IPC: moderate
Ericameria sp. goldenbush
Brassicaceae Mustard Family
Hirschfeldia incana* short-pod mustard Cal-IPC: moderate Brassica nigra* black mustard Cal-IPC: moderate
Euphorbiaceae Spurge Family
Ricinus communis* castor bean Cal-IPC: limited
Fabaceae Legume Family
Robinia pseudoacacia* black locust Cal-IPC: limited
Fagaceae Oak/Beech Family
Acacia redolens* vanilla-scented wattle
Quercus agrifolia coast live oak
Magnoliaceae Magnolia Family
Magnolia grandiflora* magnolia
431
2 Scientific Name Common Name Cal-IPC Rating
Myrtaceae Myrtle Family
Eucalyptus camaldulensis* red gum Cal-IPC: limited
Eucalyptus globulus* blue gum Cal-IPC: limited
Psidium guajava* guava
Nyctaginaceae Four o’Clock Family
Bougainvillea sp.* paperflower
Pinaceae Pine Family
Pinus sp. pine species
Podocarpaceae Podocarp Family
Podocarpus macrophyllus* yew plum pine
Polygonaceae Knotweed Family
Eriogonum fasciculatum California buckwheat
Plumbaginaceae Leadwort Family
Limonium perezii* Canarian sea lavender
MONOCOTS
Arecaceae Palm Family
Washingtonia robusta* Mexican fan palm Cal-IPC: moderate
Poaceae Grass Family
Cortaderia jubata* pampas grass Cal-IPC: high
*Non-native species
California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) Ratings: Cal-IPC is a nonprofit organization that is dedicated to protecting California’s lands and waters from ecologically-damaging invasive plants. Cal-IPC maintains the Cal-IPC Inventory (Cal-IPC, 2006), a comprehensive list of invasive plants based on ecological impacts and assigns the designation of High, Moderate, Limited, or Watch to species based on the criteria listed below x High: These species have severe ecological impacts on physical processes, plant and animal communities, and vegetation structure. Their reproductive biology and other attributes are conducive to moderate to high rates of dispersal and establishment. Most are widely distributed ecologically
x Moderate: these species have substantial and apparent-but generally not severe-ecological impacts on physically processes, plant and animal communities, and vegetation structure. Their reproductive biology and other attributes are conducive to moderate to high rates of dispersal, though establishment is generally dependent upon ecological disturbance. Ecological amplitude and distribution may range from limited to widespread.
x Limited: these species are invasive but their ecological impacts are minor on a statewide level or there was not enough information to justify a higher score. Their reproductive biology and other attributes result in low to moderate rates of invasiveness. Ecological amplitude and distribution are 432
3 Scientific Name Common Name Cal-IPC Rating
generally limited, but these species may be locally persistent and problematic. 433
4 Table 2 contains the list of wildlife species observed and/or detected during the biological field surveys.
Wildlife nomenclature and taxonomic order is based on the following treatments according to class of species:
x Birds. Check-list of North American Birds. Seventh Edition and Supplements (Chesser et al., 2022) x Mammals. Complete List of Amphibian, Reptile, Bird and Mammal Species in California (CDFW, 2016). x Native Wildlife. California’s Life History Accounts and Range Maps (accessed, 10/28/2022), CDFW 2022)
Table 2
Wildlife Species Observed/Detected during the Field Surveys Scientific Name Common Name Status
Mammals
Canidae Canine Family
Canis latrans coyote
Leporidae Cottontail Rabbit Family
Sylvilagus sp. cottontail rabbit
Sciuridae Ground Squirrel Family
Otospermophilus beecheyi California ground squirrel
Birds
Aegithalidae Long-Tailed Tit Family
Psaltriparus minimus bushtit
Corvidae Corvid Family
Aphelocoma californica California scrub-jay
Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow
Corvus corax common raven
Cuculidae Cuckoo Family
Geococcyx californianus greater roadrunner
Hirundinidae Swallow Family
Petrochelidon pyrrhonota cliff swallow
Fringillidae Finch Family
434
5 Scientific Name Common Name Status
Haemorhous mexicanus house finch
Spinus psaltria lesser goldfinch
Mimidae Mimid Family
Mimus polyglottos northern mockingbird
Toxostoma redivivum California thrasher BCC
Parulidae New World Warbler Family
Setophaga petechia yellow warbler
Passerellidae New World Sparrow Family
Melozone crissalis California towhee
Pipilo maculatus spotted towhee
Zonotrichia leucophrys white-crowned sparrow
Passeridae Family Old World Sparrow Family
Passer domesticus house sparrow
Picidae Woodpecker Family
Colaptes auratus northern flicker
Melanerpes formicivorus acorn woodpecker
Polioptilidae Gnatcatcher Family
Polioptila caerulea blue-gray gnatcatcher
Sylviidae Old World Warbler Family
Chamaea fasciata wrentit
Trochilidae Hummingbird Family
Calypte anna Anna's hummingbird
435
6 Scientific Name Common Name Status
Troglodytidae Wren Family
Thryomanes bewickii Bewick’s wren
Turdidae Turdidaethrush Family
Turdus migratorius American robin
Tyrannidae Tyrant Flycatchers Family
Tyrannus vociferans Cassin’s kingbird
x BCC = bird of conservation concern: a bird of conservation concern is listed in the USFWS’ 2008 Birds of Conservation Concern report. The report identifies species, subspecies, and populations of all migratory and non-migratory bird species (beyond those already designated as federally threatened or endangered) that, without additional conservation actions, are likely to become candidates for listing under the ESA. While all of the bird species included in the report is priorities for conservation action, the list makes no finding with regard to whether they warrant consideration for ESA listing.
436
APPENDICES
437
U ltraSystems
1 n1• • •r ,or,
Photo 2: Coastal sage scrub in offsite areas within the eastern segment of the BSA. Date: July 11, 2022.
Photo 4: Photo of ornamental vegetation (Eucalyptus with acacia understory) in the western segment of the BSA. Date: September 10, 2022.
Photo 1: View of part of the project site from the eastern segment of the BSA. Photo date: November 4, 2022.
Photo 3: Disturbed areas within the southern portion of the BSA.
Photo date: July 28, 2022.
438
Photo 6: Pepper tree groves in the western segment of the BSA.
Photo date: November 4, 2022.
Photo 8: Areas of disturbed California buckwheat scrub within the eastern segment of the BSA. Photo date: November 4, 2022.
Photo 5: Ribbon drain located in the western segment of the BSA.
Photo date: November 4, 2022.
Photo 7: Skatepark facility within the project area. Photo date: July 11, 2022.
439
APPENDICES
APPENDIX D1
CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
440
U ltraSystems
1 n1• • •r ,or,
PHASE I
CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY
FOR THE
RICHARD T. STEED MEMORIAL PARK / BARON VON WILLARD DOG PARK
MASTER PLAN UPDATE
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE,
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
Samantha Wylie, Recreation Director
City of San Clemente, Beaches, Parks & Recreation
100 N. Calle Seville
San Clemente, California 92672
Prepared by:
Stephen O’Neil, M.A., RPA
Megan Black Doukakis, M.A.
Brent Johnson, M.A.
UltraSystems Environmental Inc.
16431 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618
October 2022
Key Words: City of San Clemente; San Clemente, Calif. USGS 7.5’ topo map; survey; negative findings;
441
UltraSystems
environ men ta I• ma nag em en t • plan n Ing
CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page i Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
PHASE I
CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY
FOR THE
RICHARD T. STEED MEMORIAL PARK / BARON VON WILLARD
PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Samantha Wylie, Recreation Director
City of San Clemente, Beaches, Parks & Recreation
100 N. Calle Seville
San Clemente, California 92672
Prepared by:
Stephen O’Neil, M.A., RPA
Megan Black Doukakis, M.A.
Brent Johnson, M.A.
UltraSystems Environmental Inc.
16431 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618
October 19, 2020
Prepared by:
Stephen O’Neil, M.A., RPA
UltraSystems Environmental Inc.
Date: October 18, 2020
442
TABLE OF CONTENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page ii Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1.1 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.1.2 Disposition of Data .............................................................................................................. 1-2
2.0 Background Settings .......................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1 Natural Setting ...................................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.2 Cultural Setting ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.2.1 Prehistoric Context .............................................................................................................. 2-1
2.2.2 Ethnohistoric Context......................................................................................................... 2-2
2.2.3 Historic Context .................................................................................................................... 2-5
3.0 Research Methods ............................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1 Records Search ...................................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.2 Field Survey ............................................................................................................................................ 3-1
3.3 Native American Outreach ............................................................................................................... 3-1
4.0 Findings .................................................................................................................................................. 4-1
4.1 Records Search ...................................................................................................................................... 4-1
4.1.1 Recorded Archaeological Sites ....................................................................................... 4-1
4.1.2 Previous Cultural Resource Investigations ............................................................... 4-1
4.2 Native American Outreach ............................................................................................................... 4-3
4.3 Pedestrian Survey Results ................................................................................................................ 4-4
5.0 Management Considerations .......................................................................................................... 5-1
5.1 Site Evaluation Criteria ...................................................................................................................... 5-1
5.2 Potential Effects .................................................................................................................................... 5-1
6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 6-1
7.0 References ............................................................................................................................................. 7-1 TABLES
Table 4.1-1 - Known Cultural Resources Within a 0.5-Mile Radius .............................................................. 4-1 Table 4.1-2 - Known Cultural Resource Studies Within a 0.5-Mile Radius ................................................ 4-2
FIGURES
Figure 4.3-1 – Landscaping at Northwest Edge of Baseball Field; View to the Southwest ................. 4-5 Figure 4.3-2 – Slope Landscaping West Side of Park Entry Drive; View to the Northeast .................. 4-6 Figure 4.3-3 – Baseball Field with Grass and DG Covering; View to the East ........................................... 4-7 Figure 4.3-4 - View of Field West of Skateboard Facility; View to the North ........................................... 4-8 Figure 4.3-5 - View of Open Flat Space South of Baseball Field; View to the North............................... 4-9 Figure 4.3-6 – Stepped Slope on West Edge of Park; View to the West ....................................................4-10 443
TABLE OF CONTENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page iii Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A Project Maps
Attachment B Personnel Background
Attachment C Native American Heritage Commission Records Search and Native American Contacts
Attachment D CHRIS Records Search
444
INTRODUCTION
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 1-1 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Overview
This Phase I Cultural Resource Inventory report was prepared by UltraSystems Environmental (UltraSystems) at the request of the City of San Clemente for the Richard T. Steed / Baron Von Willard Dog Park Project (herein referred to as “project”). The project scope proposes changes to the park Master Plan that would include additional parking, an expanded skateboard park, restroom facilities, pump track facilities, volleyball courts, pickleball courts, an active meadow/multipurpose field, scenic overlook and trellis, outdoor flex classroom/event space, foul ball netting surrounding baseball fields, baseball score board, and a stair connection to a future parking lot. The current project area is an existing 44 acre park with lighted softball fields, batting cages, food concession and related facilities, a skateboard park with concession building, sand volleyball courts and a children’s play area, restroom buildings, a parking lot, and a private easement and several San Diego Gas and Electric (SDSGE) utility easements. This includes approximately 13 acres of underdeveloped park land. UltraSystems conducted this cultural resources study to evaluate the potential presence of prehistoric and historic resources within the project boundary.
The project is located along the eastern edge of San Clemente, southwest of the intersection of Avenida La Pata and Calle Extremo, with a physical address of 247 Avenida La Pata in San Clemente, Orange County, California (see Attachment A, Figure 1). The project site is located in an area that includes commercial buildings and public storage facilities to the south on Calle Extremo and Avenida Fabricante, wilderness areas and hiking trails in Talega Canyon to the east, the Bella Collina Golf Club to the north of Avenida La Pata, and religious and commercial buildings to the west off of Avenida Fabricante and Avenida La Pata (see Attachment A, Figure 2). The project site is depicted on the San Clemente, Calif., USGS 7.5’ topographical quadrangle, Range 07 West, Township 08 South, in the E ½ of the SW ¼ of Section 26. The background research and archival study included a one-half-mile buffer surrounding the project site’s Area of Potential Effect (APE) (see Attachment A, Figure 3).
Area of Potential Effect
The APE for the undertaking encompasses the maximum extent of ground disturbance required by the project design (see Attachment A, Figure 3).
1.1.1 Methods
A cultural resources records search, Native American outreach, and an intensive pedestrian cultural resources survey were undertaken by Stephen O’Neil, M.A., RPA, who qualifies as a Principal Prehistoric Archaeologist and Historical Archaeologist per United States Secretary of the Interior Standards, and Archaeological Technician Megan. B. Doukakis, M.A. (see Appendix B). The purpose of the records search was to identify previously recorded cultural resources (prehistoric and historic archaeological sites/isolates, historic buildings, structures, objects, or districts) within the project area and a one-half-mile buffer zone. The records search included a review of previously recorded prehistoric and historic archaeological resources within the proposed project area and a 0.5 mile buffer, and a review of listed cultural resource survey reports within that same geographical area.
The research was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC)at California State University, Fullerton, which is the local California Historic Resources Information System (CHRIS) facility.
445
INTRODUCTION
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 1-2 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Stephen O’Neil, M.A., RPA, contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and requested a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search as well as a list of interested local Native American tribal organizations and potentially affiliated Native American individuals. Outreach to the identified parties was contacted requesting cultural resource information. The cultural resources record search was conducted on October 4, 2022 by Ms. Doukakis, and an intensive pedestrian cultural resources survey was conducted by Mr. O’Neil on September 10, 2022. Mr. O’Neil, who qualifies as Principal Prehistoric Archaeologist and Historic Archaeologist per United States Secretary of the Interior Standards, served at the Principal Investigator (see Attachment B).
1.1.2 Disposition of Data
This report will be filed with the SCCIC, California State University, Fullerton; the City of San Clemente; and UltraSystems Environmental, Inc., Irvine, California. All field notes and other documentation related to the study will remain on file at the Irvine office of UltraSystems. 446
SETTINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 2-1 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
2.0 Background Settings
2.1 Natural Setting
The City of San Clemente is located in the southernmost portion of Orange County. The city covers a total area of 19.1 square miles. This region is relatively hilly with the project site’s elevation at between 539 and 572 feet above mean sea level (AMSL), with a very gentle slope to the north. The subject property is located in the 1,943-acre Rancho San Clemente neighborhood, which is located generally southeast of Avenida Pico and is about one-half mile inland of the Interstate 5 (I-5)/San Diego freeway. It is bounded by Marblehead Inland on the west, the Talega and Forster Ranch Specific Plan areas to the north, and Camp Pendleton U.S. Marine Corps Base on the east.
The general character and scenic quality of Rancho San Clemente is typified by steep, grassy slopes and narrow ridgelines with winding valleys below. The community has been mass graded, and significant features of the grading concept include the preservation of the primary ridgeline and viewshed area, the use of contour grading on major slopes to recreate the character of natural landforms before grading, and an emphasis on landform preservation and ungraded open space. The soils at the project site are characterized primarily as Myford sandy loam (77.2 %), which is a mixed alluvium, and to a lesser extent Bosanko clay (22.8 %), which consists of residuum weathered from granite (USDA Web Soil Survey 2022).
The region’s environment is characterized by a warm summer Mediterranean climate, with the average maximum temperature in August reaching 76 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and the average minimum temperature in December at around 50°F. Rainfall is typically less than 14 inches annually (WorldAtlas 2022).
2.2 Cultural Setting
2.2.1 Prehistoric Context
The term "prehistoric period" refers to the period of pre-contact Native California lifeways and traditions prior to the arrival of Euro-Americans.
It is widely acknowledged that human occupation in the Americas began about 13,000 or more years ago (all dates presented here are calibrated radiocarbon ages or calendar dates). However, recent discoveries in areas outside of California have pushed that age back several thousand years more to about 15,000 or even perhaps up to nearly 20,000 years ago (Smith and Barker, 2017).
To describe and understand the cultural processes that occurred during prehistory, archaeologists have routinely developed a number of chronological frameworks to correlate technological and cultural changes recognized in the archaeological record. These summaries bracket certain time spans into distinct archaeological horizons, traditions, complexes, and phases.
There are many such models even for the various sub-regions of Southern California (cf. Grayson, 2011; Warren, 1984; Jones and Klar, 2007). Given the variety of environments and the mosaic of diverse cultures within California, prehistory is typically divided into specific sub-regions that include the Interior of Southeastern California and the Mojave Desert (Warren and Crabtree, 1986), and San Diego and the Colorado Desert (Meighan, 1954; True, 1958, 1970). 447
SETTINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 2-2 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Many archaeologists tend to follow the regional syntheses adapted from a scheme developed by William J. Wallace in 1955 and modified by others (Wallace, 1978; Warren, 1968; Chartkoff and Chartkoff, 1984; Moratto 1984; Sutton et al., 2007 and others). Although the beginning and ending dates vary, the general framework of prehistory in the Southern California area consists of the following four periods:
x Paleoindian and Lake Mojave Periods [Pleistocene and Early Holocene] (ca. 11000 B.C. to 6000 B.C.). This time period is characterized by highly mobile foraging strategies and a broad spectrum of subsistence pursuits. These earliest expressions of aboriginal occupation in America were marked by the use of large dart or spear points (Fluted and Concave Base Points) that are an element of the Western Clovis expression. Following the earliest portions of this time span there was a change in climate coincident with the retreat of the glaciers.
Large bodies of water existed and lakeside aboriginal adaptations were common. Large stemmed points (Western Stemmed Series – Lake Mojave and Silver Lake point types) were accompanied by a wide variety of formalized stone tools and were employed with the aid of atlatls (dart throwing boards). The latter archaeological materials are thought to be representative of an adaptation that was in part focused on lacustrine and riverine environments.
x Millingstone Horizon [Middle Holocene] (ca. 6000 B.C. to A.D. 1000). During this time span mobile hunter-gatherers evolved and became more sedentary. Certain plant foods and small game animals came to the forefront of indigenous subsistence strategies. This prehistoric cultural expression is often notable for its large assemblage of millingstones. These are especially well-made, deep-basin metates accompanied by formalized, portable handstones (manos). Additionally, the prehistoric cultural assemblage of this time period is dominated by an abundance of scraping tools (including scraper planes and pounding/pulping implements), with only a slight representation of dart tipped - projectile points (Pinto, Elko and Gypsum types).
x Late Prehistoric Period (ca. A.D. 1000 to 1500). Following the Millingstone Horizon were cultures that appeared to have a much more complex sociopolitical organization, more diversified subsistence base and exhibited an extensive use of the bow and arrow. Small, light arrow points (Rose Spring Series), and, later, pottery mark this period along with the full development of regional Native cultures and tribal territories. x Protohistoric Period (ca. A.D. 1500 to 1700s). This final cultural period ushered in long-distance contacts with Europeans, and thereby led to the Historic Period (ca. A.D. 1700 to contemporary times). Small arrow points recognized as Desert Side-notched and Cottonwood forms are a hallmark of this time period.
2.2.2 Ethnohistoric Context
The project site lies within heartland of the Acjachemen (also known as the Juaneño) (Bean and Shipek 1978:551). Many contemporary Juaneño, who identify themselves as descendants of the indigenous society living in the local San Juan and San Mateo Creek drainage areas, have adopted the indigenous term Acjachemen. They spoke a language of the Uto-Aztecan language family, (a distinct dialect of Luiseño) of the southern, or Cupan, branch of Takic. Their lands coincide with the modern political boundaries of southern Orange and northern San Diego counties, reaching from the San Joaquin Hills in the north to Las Pulgas Creek in the south (the middle of Marine Corps Base Camp 448
SETTINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 2-3 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Pendleton), and from the Pacific Ocean coast inland to the include the Santa Ana Mountains (1987, 2002). The Juaneño maintained three known villages within five miles of the project site during the Contact Period – Tobane three miles northwest at the mouth of San Juan Creek, Pange three miles southeast at the mouth of San Mateo Creek, and Soucche five miles to the east up San Mateo Creek (O’Neil 2002).
Acjachemen villages and territory extended from Las Pulgas Creek in northern San Diego County up into the San Joaquin Hills of Orange County’s central coast, and from the Pacific Ocean into the Santa Ana Mountains. The core of their population occupied the drainages of two large creeks, San Juan Creek (and its major tributary, the Trabuco), and San Mateo Creek (combined with the San Onofre, which emptied into the ocean at the same point) (O’Neil 2002:68–78).
The Acjachemen resided in permanent, well-defined villages and associated seasonal camps. Each village contained 35 to 300 persons; these consisted of a single lineage in the smaller villages, and of a dominant clan joined with other families in the larger towns. As Boscana said of the Acjachemen, “all the rancherias were composed of a single relationship” (Boscana 1933:33). Each clan/village had its own resource territory and was politically independent, yet maintained ties to others through economic, religious, and social networks in the immediate region. There were three hierarchical social classes: the elite class consisting of chiefly families, lineage heads, and other ceremonial specialists; a “middle class” of established and successful families; and finally, there were people of disconnected or wandering families and captives of war (Bean 1976:109–111). Native leadership consisted of the Nota, or clan chief, who conducted community rites and regulated ceremonial life in conjunction with the council of elders, or puuplem, which was made up of lineage heads and ceremonial specialists in their own right. This body discussed and decided upon matters of the community, which were then carried out by the Nota and his staff.
As a strongly patrilineal society, residence has been regarded as patrilocal, but recent study of the Mission San Juan Capistrano sacramental registers has indicated a number of births at the mother’s village as well as at third villages (O’Neil 2002); however, patrilocality did dominate. Polygyny was practiced, but most likely only by chiefs and puuls with ceremonial positions who had larger economic roles within the community (Boscana 1933:44). Marriage was used as a mechanism of politics, ecology, and economics. Important lineages were allied through marriage, and reciprocally useful alliances were arranged between groups of differing ecological niches.
As summarized by Bean and Shipek (Bean and Shipek 1978:552), plant foods were, by far, the greatest part of the traditional diet. Acorns were the most important single food source; two species were used locally. Villages were located near water sources necessary for the leaching of acorns, which was a daily occurrence. As an almost daily staple, the acorn mush, or weewish, could be fixed in various ways and was served as gruel, cakes, or fried. Grass seeds were the next most abundant plant food used. Other important seeds were manzanita, sunflower, sage, chia, lemonade berry, wild rose and pine nuts. Seeds were parched, ground, and cooked as mush in various combinations according to taste and availability, much in the manner as weewish. Greens such as thistle, lamb’squarters, miner’s lettuce, white sage, and clover were eaten raw or cooked or sometimes dried for storage. Cactus pods and fruits were used. Cooked yucca buds, blossoms, and pods provided a sizable addition to the community’s food resources. Bulbs, roots, and tubers were dug in the spring and summer and usually eaten. Various teas were made from flowers, fruits, stems, and roots for medicinal cures as well as beverages.
The principal game animals were deer, rabbit, jackrabbit, woodrat, mice, ground squirrels, antelope, quail, dove, ducks, and other birds. Trout and other fish were caught in the streams, while salmon 449
SETTINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 2-4 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
were available when they ran in the larger creeks. Predominantly a coastal people, the Acjachemen made extensive use of marine foods in their diet. Sea mammals, fish, and crustaceans were hunted and gathered from both the shoreline and the open ocean, using reed and dugout canoes. Shellfish were the most heavily used resource, including abalone, turbans, mussels, and others from the rocky shores; some clams, scallops, and univalves from the sandy beaches; and Chione, bubble shells, and others gathered from the estuaries.
By 1873, a government report (Ames 1873) recorded about 40 Juaneño associated with Mission San Juan Capistrano. During this same era, the priests at Mission San Juan Capistrano served a circuitriding ministry to these interior villages to the south and on the other side of the Palomar Mountains.
A wave of migration by Juaneño out of San Juan occurred in 1880–1900 as towns in northern Orange County started to form and needed laborers. Today a number of Indians whose ancestors were associated with Mission San Juan Capistrano still reside in the local area. Acjachemen interest in their own history has increased in recent decades, and a considerable body of evidence tracing that history has been amassed. There is currently a petition for federal recognition filed by the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians (Acjachemen Nation).
2.2.2.1 Local Settlements and Features
The coast of Orange County is known to have been heavily populated during the Late Prehistoric and Contact Period by Native American settlement. In the vicinity of San Clemente, a few of these settlements are known by name, while others may be represented by large archaeological sites that have yet to be associated with place names.
In the San Clemente area, there were at least four Acjachemen villages inhabited during the Contact period (O’Neil 2002). The village of Tobone was approximately six miles to the west near the beach at the mouth of San Juan Creek. To the south nearer the project area was the largest village in Achacgemen lands, Panhe, on the north bluff overlooking San Mateo Creek and just three miles south of the project site; along with the central village area associated with the archaeological site CA-ORA11, there are multiple smaller camp and ceremonial sites along the bluff and in the canyon below associated with this village. Much of the Panhe archaeological site complex is a National Register of Historic Places Archaeological District. The third Acjachemen village in the project area is Zoucche, just up Cristianitos Canyon from its confluence with the San Mateo, approximately one and a quarter mile to the southeast from the project boundary. Zoucche was visited by the Portolá Expedition in August 1769 (see Section 2.2.3.1 below). There was also the village of Tove, likely located in Telega Canyon, approximately three and a half miles to the north.
Analysis of the mission registers show a predictably greater number of marriage ties from villages in proximity to south San Clemente among the villages south of San Juan Creek than to the north or east (O’Neil 2002:66). Pange dominates the analysis, its larger population allowing for social connections to Zoucche, Uchme, Mocuacchem, Tove, and Tobani. Another nexus was at Uxme (on Camp Pendleton), connecting with regional towns such as Mocuachem, Chacapa, and Topome. There were also marriages between Tove in Cristianitos Canyon and Pomameye at Las Pulgas. The villages along the San Mateo drainage – Pange, Tove, and Zoucche – also maintained ties to settlements in the San Juan Capistrano valley to the north.
As noted above, Pange was a very large village at the mouth of San Mateo Creek. Twice the size of any other Acjachemen village, Pange dominated the local social networks with marriage ties to almost every settlement. Like Pange, Topome to the south on Camp Pendleton dominated the local 450
SETTINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 2-5 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
social network along the Santa Margarita River drainage and exercised political control over the closer small villages (Johnson and O’Neil 2001:24-26).
There were probably more Acjachemen villages in the San Mateo Creek region than have been documented to date. The list of 15 legendary villages recorded by Fr. Boscana in the 1820s (Boscana 1934:60–62) have not all been located; the last half of the list appears to note names from the tribe’s southern and southeastern territory. In addition, there are numerous ranchería names in the mission registers that have not been located. The long and sometimes wide valleys of San Mateo and San Onofre Canyons, plus the associated mountain potreros, would have been ideal locales for some of these “floating” villages.
Although it took 10 to 20 years to reduce village populations in today’s south San Clemente area, the impact of Spanish hegemony on the traditional Acjachemen way of life began shortly after the Capistrano mission was established. The military guard maintained a small herd of horses, and cattle herding began immediately. The San Mateo floodplain was ideal farmland, and was soon regarded by the missionaries as more valuable than the San Juan Valley where the mission had been established. While the immediate impact on game animals and grasslands was minimal, there would have been frequent Euro-American traffic within lands belonging to the various clans. The supply trains, mail routes, and military troop convoys which linked the chain of Spanish missions and presidios, passed through the San Mateo and Cristianitos Canyons from 1769 through 1778. In 1779, the processions were routed along the coast through the villages of Uxme, Pange, and Eñe.
2.2.3 Historic Context
2.2.3.1 Spanish/Mexican Era
The first Europeans to observe what would come to be called Southern California were members of Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo's ocean expedition of 1542. However, Cabrillo and other early explorers only sailed along the coast and did not trek far inland. It would be several centuries before the first EuroAmerican entered into the region surrounding the project site. The expedition of survey and exploration lead by Lt. Colonel Gaspar de Portolá of A.D. 1769-1770 provides the first record of the San Clemente area. Leading Spanish troops on an initial attempt to reach Monterey Bay and establish a fort, the expedition entered the San Clemente area when they crossed San Mateo Creek and traveled up Cristianitos Canyon in late July 1769. They noted a village (Zoucche) at the confluence of these two creeks, and the accompanying priests recorded their baptism of two young children here (Crespí 2001:293-295). Continuing up the main canyon, they passed Talega Canyon on the right and passed by another village (Tobe) near the top of the pass that they took to San Juan Creek (Crespí 2001:297).
The Spanish soon frequented the road they had forged over Indian trails as Mission San Gabriel was founded to the north in 1772, and troops, padres, mail and supplies passed back and forth from the San Diego Presidio to the northern missions. Soon shifted to a coastal route passing by the mouth of Canyada Segundo Deshecha, this road came to be known as El Camino Real (and eventually I-5).
The founding of Mission San Juan Capistrano in 1776 gave the Spanish a foothold in the area. Priests immediately began proselytizing the local Acjachemen tribal villages, and within two years converts started to come from the town of Pange located on the ledge overlooking the mouth of San Mateo Creek (O’Neil and Evans 1980:229). Inhabitants from the other villages in the San Clemente region likewise were baptized and relocated to the mission to live as neofitos, though this was not the case with all of the Native Americans. Military reports and letters from the priests state that during the first five years of the Mission the most active resistance to the invaders came from the region south of the mission and specifically from villages within the San Mateo Creek drainage (O’Neil 2002:182- 451
SETTINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 2-6 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
184). There was resulting conflict with Native Americans, as traditional hunting and gathering lands were converted to ranch and farmland. The two missions laid claim to much of what would become Orange County, grazing cattle, horses, and sheep there until the 1830s (Brigandi 2007).
California started to change politically and economically in the 1820s when the fruits of Mexico’s revolt against Spain resulted in California becoming a province of the independent state of Mexico.
There was a rapid influx of colonizers and a growing demand for grants of land on which to start ranches (Beck and Williams 1972: 77-80). At the same time the decades of disease, crowding, and forced assimilation to a new social order had taken their toll on the Native population both at the missions and the surrounding territories. At the same time the growing population of Gente de Razon newcomers wanted more lands and more Indians to work the lands for them.
In the San Clemente area, the Boca de la Playa of 6,607 acres was granted to Emigdio Véjar in 1846 (Meadows 1966:114). The giant Misión Vieja, ó La Paz (containing the original “old Mission” site) of 46,432 acres, whose southern corner reaches into the hills behind San Clemente, was granted to August Olvera in 1845, a mere two days before he, in turn, sold it to Juan Forster.
California's first vineyard was located on the Mission grounds, with the planting of the "Mission" or "Criollo" grape in 1779, one grown extensively throughout Spanish America at the time. It was the only grape grown in the Mission system throughout the mid-19th century. The first winery in Alta California was built in San Juan Capistrano in 1783; both red and white wines (sweet and dry), brandy, and a port-like fortified wine called Angelica were all produced from the Mission grape (Kelsey 1993; Pinney 1989).
After an initial period of exploration, the Spanish concentrated on the founding of presidios, missions, and secular towns with the land held by the Crown (1769-1821). In contrast, the later Mexican policy stressed individual ownership of the land. Mexico rebelled against Spain in 1810, and by 1821, Mexico, including its California province, achieved independence. The Mexican Republic began to grant private land to citizens to encourage emigration to California. When secularization of the missions occurred in the 1830s, huge land grant ranchos took up large sections of land in California.
Former mission lands were granted to soldiers, other Mexican citizens, and a few wealthy foreigners.
In 1841, the former mission became a Mexican pueblo named San Juan Capistrano. Ranchos surrounded the mission lands in all directions (Castillo 1978). With the signing of the Treaty of Cordoba in 1821, Mexico gained its independence from Spain, but the San Gabriel Mission near what is now Los Angeles, California, continued to expand, and established Rancho San Gorgonio in 1824 (Gunther 1984; Gudde 1949). The lands along the coast were open for early settlement by the colonists from New Spain.
As with the rest of California, the arrival of Europeans resulted in the introduction of diseases with the Euro-American colonists. Later, with the secularization of the missions in the 1830s the mission lands were granted to secular landowners. Nonetheless, some Luiseno/Acjachemen semi-traditional villages remained in the interior mountains, and the people of these villages still practiced hunting and gathering, although agriculture also had become an important part of their economy (Bean and Shipek 1978).
The Mexican-American War of 1846 saw the invasion of California from both land and sea. Following several skirmishes in the San Diego and Los Angeles areas, and the capture of the territorial capital in Monterey, the United States rule was firmly established. (Dumke, 1944). 452
SETTINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 2-7 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
2.2.3.2 Early American period
The signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848 ended the Mexican-American War and California became a territory of the United States. The discovery of gold at Sutter’s Mill in 1848 influenced the history of the state and the nation. Following the rapid influx of population to the north because of the Gold Rush of 1849, California was made a state in 1850 (Dumke, 1944).
The economic and social order was slow to change in the southern portion of the state, however, and rancheros were left in control of their vast estates through the 1860s. Los Angeles was a part of the “Cow Counties” and had little representation in the state legislature because of the sparse population (Cleland 1951). This allowed the predominantly Anglo population of the north to pass laws aimed at breaking up the ranches for settlement by Eastern farmers and, coupled with devastating droughts that crippled many livestock owners, their dismemberment soon came. This helped pave the way for the “Boom of the Eighties” which saw an influx of people from the rest of the United States and the beginning of many of the towns we see today (Dumke, 1944).
Development of roads across California’s southeastern deserts assisted with the development of freighting and express companies as well as the appearance of a stagecoach system. Thousands of settlers and immigrants poured into the state, particularly after the completion of the transcontinental railroad in 1869. The 1860’s and 1870’s show an increase in farmers, and merchants into the area (Cleland 1951).
2.2.3.3 County History: Orange County
Anaheim was the first American town founded in what is now Orange County. In 1857, a group of German immigrants living in San Francisco bought a portion of the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana to start a new community, built on winemaking. After the initial development was complete, the first colonists moved to Anaheim in 1859 (Brigandi 2007).
In 1870, the first commercial vessel entered Newport Bay, which soon became a regular shipping point. The Southern Pacific built the first railroad in the area, extending its tracks south from Los Angeles to Anaheim in 1875. The Southern Pacific railroad held a monopoly in Southern California until 1885, when the Santa Fe pushed its tracks over the Cajon Pass (Masters 2013). Competition brought a boom to the area in the form of lowered cost of living and a real estate boom that created many small towns. Deemed “paper towns” these small enclaves disappeared as the boom faded and they were reabsorbed into larger towns like Fullerton, Buena Park, and San Clemente (Brigandi 2007).
But this burst of economic growth had led to the creation of the County of Orange in March 1889, occupying 780 square miles. Orange County remained primarily agricultural through most of the twentieth century. Until the 1950s, agriculture was king, but soon oil wells were being drilled in La Habra and Olinda. A mini oil boom was started when major strikes were found in Placentia (1919) and Huntington (1920) (Masters 2013; Brigandi 2007)
The I-5 was completed in 1954 and connected many Orange County communities with Los Angeles, making Orange County a bedroom community for many who moved to Southern California to work in the new developing aerospace and manufacturing industries attracted to the area. Orange County received a further boost in 1955 with the opening of Disneyland (Galvin 2011). 453
SETTINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 2-8 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
By the 1980s the county was developed with numerous master planned communities and became the second most populous county in California as the population topped two million for the first time.
Today Orange County is identified with amusement parks, including Disneyland, as well as its many miles of beaches (Masters 2013).
2.2.3.4 City History: San Clemente
Hamilton H. Cotton headed a syndicate of 45 people to buy the ranch and, along with a trust company, attained ownership of the coastal land of Los Desechos. A land speculator and community developer, Ole Hanson, had also seen the stretch of land south of San Juan Capistrano and thought it the ideal location for a planned community. Hanson announced in 1925 that 2,000 acres of land on the coast would be the site for a new town; that streets were already being graded; lots were laid out, and soon work would start on community buildings (Banks 1930:44-45). The town was named San Clemente for the island visible off the coast. Hanson started selling lots in 1925 and, while the community did not “boom,” it was successful. San Clemente was incorporated in 1928 with title to the water system, the beach club, the pier, 3,000 feet of beach, a community center, the school, and parks (Banks 1930:54-57, 77-78).
Hanson did not allow deviation from his Spanish Village dream. In December 1925, Hanson attracted over 600 people to hear his pitch and succeeded in promoting the new area and selling property along with an idea. That was the birth of San Clemente, when average lots sold for $300. Prime lots went for $1,500. Within the first six months, Hanson set a record by selling 1,200 lots. Every home ownership deed mandated that residents comply with stringent Spanish Colonial Revival style guidelines, enforcing uniform handmade red tile roofs and whitewashed stucco walls. A tile and wrought iron foundry was even established in town to meet the needs of the rapidly growing community. If a home failed to meet the requirements, Hanson would buy the home back or pay to have it remodeled himself (Leiren 1985).
The area was officially incorporated as a city on February 27, 1928. Today, the “Spanish Village by the Sea” is more heterogeneous than Hanson had envisioned, but historic homeowners and current planning and development all reflect a growing respect for his red-roofed, white-walled Spanish architecture dream (City of San Clemente 2021).
The city of San Clemente hugged the narrow stretch of coastline well into the 20th century with the interior hills remained devoted to cattle from the Mission Viejo and other smaller ranches. Because the Marine Corps, at the start of World War II, had taken over the Rancho Santa Margarita y Las Flores for Camp Pendleton, the Forster family was displaced from their home on that ranch and moved their headquarters to the Misión Vieja. Many of the older ranch hands retired while the younger men went off to fight in the war. San Clemente remained partially a resort town because of its beaches, as a stopping point on the long drive between Los Angeles and San Diego, and a community of summer homes for the wealthy.
Housing developments and a boom of city expansion hit northern Orange County directly after World War II. In 1958, the San Diego Freeway (I-5) was completed through south Orange County, making the area more accessible to beach goers. Similar development came later in the hilly south county, as the other areas were built-out. This was especially true for communities such as San Clemente and San Juan Capistrano, where development away from the beach and east of the freeway started primarily in the 1990s. Until this time, the land was still predominately inhabited by cattle, deer, and the occasional vaquero.
454
SETTINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 2-9 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Historic homeowners must abide by city codes that protect the aesthetic spirit and style of early San Clemente. New development east of the I-5 freeway now elevates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture to new interpretations, incorporating red roofs, balconies, and promenades as the demographics of San Clemente shift and new residents are drawn to the Mediterranean charm of this community. City development officials have leveraged new growth to funnel money into programs that reinvigorate and restore the historic downtown (San Clemente Historical 2008).
2.2.3.5 Project Site History
With the known strict historical guidelines the City of San Clemente was founded on, an inquiry to San Clemente Historical Society was made by historian Brent Johnson, which resulted in a statement that there are no historic monuments or buildings within a one mile radius of the project site.
Historical aerial photos from 1938 shows the entire project area to be undeveloped (but is known to have been used for cattle ranching – see Sections 2.2.3.1 and 2.2.3.2 above) until sometime between 1980 and 1989, when the site and adjacent property to the north were developed with roads, lots, parks and a water storage pond (NETR Online 1938, 1980, 1989).
By 1996 aerial photos show the parcels to the southwest and west of the project site have been developed with housing and industrial areas (NETR Online 1996). By 2003, commercial development has expanded to include areas to the immediate south and western borders of the project site. No further changes are present in the aerials thru 2018 (NETR Online 2003, 2018).
United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps that are available that include San Clemente begin in 1949 for the project site and show no development anywhere within the project area (NETR Online 1949).
The first land use changes appear in the topographic maps from 1970, which suggest that this project site sits on or adjacent to land utilized for military training purposes by Camp Pendleton 2nd Battalion, 4th Marines and the Naval Expeditionary Medical training Institute, as a radio facility and water tank appear on the maps to the west of the project site, as well as a firing range to the east, and a Gauging Station to the northeast, all appearing as primary features on the 1970, 1975 and 1978 USGS maps(NETR Online 1970, 1975, 1978).
Those locations and uses are still present in the 1978 topo map, but by the 2012 version they are no longer present as active features. The 2012 map shows the town of San Clemente development spreading from the west into the project area with all the current subdivisions present. The 2018 USGS map highlights many of the trails present in the project area, especially to the northeast (NETR Online 2012, 2018).
455
RESEARCH METHODS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 3-1 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
3.0 Research Methods
This cultural resources inventory and related archival research included a background cultural resources records check (archival research) at the SCCIC, California State University, Fullerton.
Additionally, a search of their SLF was requested from the NAHC, as well as a list of local Native American groups and individuals for outreach. Finally, a pedestrian cultural resource survey of the entire project site was conducted.
3.1 Records Search
A cultural resource records search to identify cultural resources on or near the project site was completed by Ms. Doukakis at the SCCIC on October 4, 2022. The local CHRIS facility for Orange County, maintained at the SCCIC, was reviewed to identify resources that have been previously evaluated for historic significance, as well as to identify any previous completed cultural resources survey reports for the area.
The records and maps were searched and reviewed for cultural resources and surveys in Orange County, National Register of Historic Places; Listed Properties and Determined Eligible Properties (2012); and the California Register of Historical Resources (2012).
For the current study, the scope of the records search included a 0.5-mile buffer zone from the project’s footprint (see Attachment A, Figure 3). The research effort was completed to assess the sensitivity of the project site for both surface and subsurface cultural resources and to assist in determining the potential to encounter such resources, especially prehistoric—i.e., Native American cultural remains, during earth-moving activities associated with the proposed project.
3.2 Field Survey
On September 10, 2022, Mr. O’Neil visited the project site to conduct a pedestrian survey, during which the project site was carefully inspected for any indication of human activities dating to the prehistoric or historic periods (i.e., 50 years or older).
3.3 Native American Outreach
On June 10, 2022, Mr. O’Neil contacted the NAHC via email notifying them of the project activities, requesting a search of their SLF, and requesting a list of local tribal organizations and individuals to contact for project outreach. The NAHC replied on July 20, 2022 with a letter dated the same day reporting on the SLF search finding of negative results, and a list of 16 tribal representatives to contact.
Letters to local tribes were sent on July 22, 2022 to all of the tribal organizations and individuals listed in the NAHC July 20, 2022 letter (Attachment C). 456
FINDINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 4-1 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
4.0 Findings
4.1 Records Search
4.1.1 Recorded Archaeological Sites
Based on the cultural resources records search, it was determined that no prehistoric or historic cultural resources were previously recorded within the project site boundary. Within the half-mile buffer zone, there have been four prehistoric cultural resource sites consisting of various amounts of lithics: CA-ORA-747 is an isolate consisting of a single flake and a pebble chopper located approximately 50 meters to the south of the project (Piper et al. 1978); ORA-749 consists of four flaked tools and six waste flakes, all of basalt, located approximately 240 meters to the northwest of the project boundary (Douglas and Piper 1978); ORA-777 is a small camp consisting of three basalt flake cores, 18 basalt and rhyolite flakes, one each basalt and rhyolite flake tool, and one rhyolite core tool, located approximately 675 meters to the southwest of the project boundary (Douglas 1979a); and ORA-788 is a small work camp consisting of a mano fragment, a hammer stone, a flake core and a flake tool both made of basalt, and 11 basalt and rhyolite flakes, located approximately 550 meters southwest of the project boundary (Douglas 1979b). Table 4.1-1 summarizes these site records. All four of these sites have since been destroyed through housing and commercial development, and golf course landscaping,
Table 4.1-1
KNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN A 0.5-MILE RADIUS
Site Number Author(s) Date Type Description
30-000747
Piper, S., R.
Douglas and P.
Munro (Stickel,
Gary E.)
1978 Pre-Historic
Isolated artifacts along cow path in
between a corral and water hole.
Large primary flake, and a stream
worn pebble chopper.
30-000749
Douglas, R., and
S. Piper (Stickel,
Gary E.)
1978 Pre-Historic
Four flaked tools (basalt) and 6
waste flakes (basalt) along a freshly
graded road.
30-000777 Douglas, R. 1979a Pre-Historic
Flake and flake tool scatter on
southeast slope along road cut and
cattle paths consisting of 3 basalt
flake cores, 18 basalt and rhyolite
flakes, 1 QX flake, 1 rhyolite core
tool, 1 rhyolite flake tool, and 1
basalt flake tool.
30-000788 Douglas, R. 1979b Pre-Historic
Artifact scatter along ridge
consisting of 1 mano fragment, 2
hammer stones, 9 basalt flakes, 2
rhyolite flakes, 1 basalt flake core,
and 1 basalt flake tool.
4.1.2 Previous Cultural Resource Investigations
The SCCIC records indicate there have been five previous cultural resource studies within a half-mile buffer of the project site (see Table 4.1-2) (see Attachment D). Two of the cultural studies were a literature review that included the project area. The remaining three cultural studies involved 457
FINDINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 4-2 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
archaeology field investigations around and including the project boundary. Cultural report OR00674 identified one isolated artifact and a fine-grained volcanic flake approximately 1,018 meters south-southwest of the subject property. Cultural report OR-00951, which was a review of multiple sites in Rancho San Clemente on both sides of Avenida Pico west of the project boundary, identified numerous prehistoric sites with an accumulated 6,800 lithic artifacts and 11,000 flakes, including manos, metates, bowl/mortars, pestles, unidentifiable ground stone fragments, hammerstones, bifaces, scraper planes, and ceramics (Cameron et al. 1986). Cultural report OR-01885 consisted of archaeological investigations at the 2,000-acre Visbeek Ranch, involving 244 auger holes at 13 sites, and test pits excavated at eight sites, which yielded historic artifacts of glass and metal, as well as prehistoric artifacts consisting of ground stone fragments, grinding slabs, hand-sized stone (unifacial and bifacial manos), wood pestles, and cutting edges (Stickle et al. 1979). Among the sites recorded during this study are the four described above in Section 4.1.1, near but outside the current project boundary.
Table 4.1-2
KNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES WITHIN A 0.5-MILE RADIUS Report
Number Author(s) Date Title Resources
OR-00239 Stickel, Gary E. 1978
A Cultural Resources Survey
of Visbeek Ranch, San
Clemente, Orange County,
California
30-000633, 30-000634,
30-000635, 30-000636,
30-000637, 30-000638,
30-000639, 30-000745,
30-000746, 30-000747,
30-000748, 30-000749,
30-000750
OR-00670 LSA Associates, Inc. 1983
Rancho San Clemente
Cultural Resources: A Review
and Literature Update
30-000504, 30-000633,
30-000634, 30-000635,
30-000636, 30-000637,
30-000638, 30-000639,
30-000745, 30-000746,
30-000747, 30-000748,
30-000749, 30-000750,
30-000777, 30-000788,
30-000789
OR-00674 Padon, Beth 1983
Archaeological Assessment
of a Portion of Rancho San
Clemente, San Clemente,
California
30-100102
OR-00951
Cameron, Constance
with Pamela
Maxwell, Adella
Schroth, Theodore
Cooley, Richard
Cerreto, Lorann
Santoro, Anne
Duffield
1986
Archaeological
Investigations on the Rancho
San Clemente, Orange
County, California
30-000504, 30-000632,
30-000633, 30-000634,
30-000635, 30-000636,
30-000637, 30-000638,
30-000639, 30-000640,
30-000745, 30-000746,
30-000747, 30-000748,
30-000749, 30-000750,
30-000777, 30-000788,
30-000789, 30-001053,
30-001056
458
FINDINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 4-3 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Report
Number Author(s) Date Title Resources
OR-01885
E. Stickel, J.
Zahniser, and R.
Douglas
1979
Project Report: Test-Phase
Investigations of the Cultural
Resources of Visbeek Ranch,
San Clemente, County of
Orange, California
30-000504, 30-000633,
30-000634, 30-000635,
30-000636, 30-000637,
30-000638, 30-000639,
30-000745, 30-000746,
30-000747, 30-000748,
30-000749, 30-000750,
30-000777, 30-000788,
30-000789
4.2 Native American Outreach
On June 10, 2022, Mr. O’Neil contacted the NAHC via email and facsimile notifying them of the project, requesting a search of their SLF and asking for a list of local tribal organizations and individuals to contact for project outreach. The results of the search request were received July 20, 2022, at the office of UltraSystems from Mr. Andrew Green, Cultural Resources Analyst. The NAHC letter stated that “A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative [emphasis in the original].” (See Attachment C.) UltraSystems prepared letters to each of the 16 tribal contacts describing the project and a map showing the project's location, requesting a reply if they have knowledge of cultural resources in the area, and asked if they had any questions or concerns regarding the project (see Attachment C). On July 22, 2022, Mr. O’Neil mailed the letters with accompanying maps to all 16 tribal contacts and also emailed identical letters and maps to each of the 15 tribal contacts for which email addresses were known. An email response was received from Deneen Pelton, Cultural Resources Department Coordinator for the Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians on July 29, 2022, indicating that the tribe has no information to provide and asked that we contact tribes closer to the project area.
Following up on the initial letter and email contacts, telephone calls were conducted on October 17, 2022, to complete the outreach process. These calls were to the 14 tribal contacts who had not already responded to UltraSystems’ mailing and email. Nine telephone calls were placed with no answer and messages were left describing the project and requesting a response. These were to Sonia Johnston, Chairperson of the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians; Matias Belardes, Chairperson of the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation; Joyce Perry, Tribal Manager of the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation; Heidi Lucero, Chairperson of the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation 84A; Norma Contreras, Chairperson of the La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians; Shasta Gaughen, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer of the Pala Band of Mission Indians; Temet Aguilar, Chairperson of the Pauma Band of Luiseño Indians; Mark Macarro, Chairperson of the Pechanga Band of Indians; and Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair of the Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians. In a call to the Tribal Council of the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians there was no answer, and no ability to leave a message.
During the telephone calls of October 17, 2022, Joseph Ontiveros of the Cultural Resource Department for the Soboba Band of Luiseño indicated that the tribe would defer to tribes closer to the project area. Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources Coordinator for the Pechanga Band of Indians indicated that they will be deferring any comments to Joyce Perry (with the Juaneño Band of Mission 459
FINDINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 4-4 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Indians – Acjachemen Nation). Mr. Paul Macarro also indicated that the tribe knows of two (prehistoric) sites, one about 148 yards to the northeast and one 250 yards to the southeast of the project area; he believes that there would be a high probability that cultural material will be encountered. (See Attachment C.)
4.3 Pedestrian Survey Results
A pedestrian survey was conducted on September 10, 2022 by Mr. O’Neil. The survey consisted of walking, visually inspecting, and photographing the exposed ground surface and landscaped areas of the project site using standard archaeological procedures and techniques. The survey was conducted in the afternoon; the temperature was in the mid-70s° F and the sky was completely clear.
Due to the current nature of the topography of the park and the facilities there, survey of the ground surface was conducted in an opportunistic manner. Most of the flat area of the park is taken up by an asphalt parking lot (west central), a concrete skateboard facility (northwest), a secondary parking lot with a utility structure (north), a dog park covered with grass and outdoor structures (northeast), a central driveway (north), and a large circular baseball field with four diamonds covered in a wellmaintained lawn, and decomposed granite (DG). The San Clemente, Calif. 7.5” USGS topographic maps show the park to be situated in what had been an area fully covered with ridgelines and two major ravines running to Cristianitos Canyon to the east with elevations ranging from 660 feet to the west to 400 feet to the northeast. The park land is now graded flat through its central, northwest and southern sections, approximately 70 percent of the project site. The remaining surface consists of steep slopes bordering the flat graded areas along the western, eastern and southern edges of the park; these slopes have also been graded with horizontal cuts to minimize erosion. These slopes surrounding the several park facilities have been landscaped with a variety of ornamental and California native trees and shrubs especially surrounding the central baseball field, the skateboard facility, both parking areas, and along Avenida La Pata on the northern boundary. The major slopes to the west and east are a mix of ornamental shrubs and natural native revegetation that make a dense cover. In the central park landscaping, much of the surface between plants is covered with bark mulch (Figure 4.3-1). This is the current landscape on which the survey transects and observations were made.
The gentler landscaped slopes surrounding the skateboard facility, the baseball field circle (Figure
4.3-2), and the lower parking area, were walked over. The slopes alongside the main driveway off of Avenida La Pata, and along Avenida La Pata itself, were observed by walking along their base. The baseball field circle was walked across and the entire surface was seen to be covered with either DG or by a well-maintained lawn (Figure 4.3-3); the dog park area was also seen to be covered with DG, with no native soil visible. The only surface with visible grounds was a flat area west and adjacent to the skateboard facility (Figure 4.3-4), which was walked in 10 meter transects oriented east/west.
The southern third of the park grounds is open and flat and much of it is used for equipment storage and vehicles (Figure 4.3-5). This area was walked over. The east and west boundary slopes are cut to a 45° angle and even in a natural state would be unlikely to contain cultural resources. Nonetheless several transects up and down the slopes were made on both of them, gaining access to the western slope off of Avenida Fabricante and to the eastern slope off of Calle Extremo.
It could be seen that the stepped flat areas of the park have been graded several feet below the original surface, and the slopes between the flat areas and along the boundary have been cut back several feet as well (Figure 4.3-6). It is suggested that there is no original surface soil remaining on 460
FINDINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 4-5 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
the park lands and much of the current ground surface is represented by exposed deeper geological soils. Also, much of the current surface is either covered by asphalt and structures, or by landscaping.
The result of the pedestrian survey was negative for both historic and prehistoric cultural resources.
Approximately 40 percent of the current ground surface was visible. Photographs of the project site were taken during the cultural resources survey.
Figure 4.3-1
LANDSCAPING AT NORTHWEST EDGE OF BASEBALL FIELD; VIEW TO SOUTHWEST L
461
FINDINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 4-6 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Figure 4.3-2
SLOPE LANDSCAPING WEST SIDE OF PARK ENTRY DRIVE; VIEW TO THE NORTHEAST
462
FINDINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 4-7 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Figure 4.3-3
BASEBALL FIELD WITH GRASS AND DG COVERING; VIEW TO THE EAST
463
FINDINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 4-8 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Figure 4.3-4
VIEW OF FIELD WEST OF SKATEBOARD FACILITY; VIEW TO THE NORTH
464
FINDINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 4-9 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Figure 4.3-5
VIEW OF OPEN FLAT SPACE SOUTH OF BASEBALL FIELD; VIEW TO THE NORTH 465
FINDINGS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 4-10 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Figure 4.3-6
STEPPED SLOPE ON WEST EDGE OF PARK; VIEW TO THE WEST
466
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 5-1 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
5.0 Management Considerations
5.1 Site Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation of significance under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) uses criteria found in eligibility descriptions from the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). Generally, a resource is to be considered historically significant if it meets the criteria for listing in the California Register [Public Resources Code § 5024.1; California Code of Regulations § 15064.5(a)(3)]. These criteria provide that a resource may be listed as potentially significant if it:
x Is associated with the events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California history and cultural heritage.
x Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. x Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic value. x Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
5.2 Potential Effects
There are no CRHR listed prehistoric or historic cultural resource sites within the project boundary.
No cultural resources will be adversely affected by the project. However, the presence of buried cultural (prehistoric and/or historic archaeological) resources cannot be ruled out. If prehistoric and/or historic artifacts are observed during subsurface excavation, work should be stopped in that area and a qualified archaeologist monitor should be called to assess the finds. 467
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 6-1 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
No prehistoric or historic archaeological resources were identified during the pedestrian field survey of the project. The potential for subsurface cultural deposits is also minimal.
Two Native American responses to UltraSystems’ tribal outreach have been received to date (see Section 4.2 and Attachment C). The Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians stated that they had no information to provide and would defer to closer tribes. Mr. Joseph Ontiveros of the Soboba Band of Luiseno also indicated they would defer to tribes closer to the project. Mr. Paul Macarro, speaking for the Pechanga Band of Indians, indicated that they would defer to Joyce Perry with the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians – Belardes, but also noted they were aware of three prehistoric archaeological sites in the immediate area of the project site indicating this area would be sensitive of cultural resources.
The cultural resources study findings suggest that there is a low potential for the presence of prehistoric cultural resources. The CHRIS records showed that while a previous regional survey located four prehistoric camp sites surrounding the project boundary, none were located within the project itself (see Section 4.1.1). Three of those sites would be the three that Mr. Macarro spoke of.
In addition, the extensive grading of the park site that took place during its initial construction has apparently removed all surface native soil (see Section 4.3, pages 4-4 to 4-5). However, if prehistoric and/or historic items are observed during subsurface activities, work should be stopped in that area and a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitor should be called to assess the findings and retrieve the material.
The results of the pedestrian assessment indicate no impacts to prehistoric or historical resources are anticipated during project construction. The cultural resources study findings suggest that there is a low potential for the presence of prehistoric cultural resources. Therefore, it is not recommended that archaeological monitoring be conducted during subsurface ground construction work.
If human remains are encountered during excavations associated with this project, work will halt in that area and the Orange County Coroner will be notified (§ 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code).
The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of recent human origin or older Native American ancestry. If the coroner, with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistoric, they will contact the NAHC. The NAHC will be responsible for designating the most likely descendant (MLD), who will make recommendations as to the manner for handling these remains and further provide for the disposition of the remains, as required by § 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Following notification by the NAHC, the MLD will make these recommendations within 48 hours of having access to the project site following notification by the NAHC. These recommendations may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials (§ 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code).
468
REFERENCES
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 7-1 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
7.0 References
Bandy, Marcy, and Maurice Bandy
1998 Saddleback Ancestors: Rancho Families of Orange County, California. Revised Edition.
Orange County Genealogical Society, Orange, California.
Banks, Homer
1930 The Story of San Clemente. Privately Published. [El Herald de San Clemente.] Bean, Lowell John, and Charles R. Smith
1978 Gabrielino. In Handbook of North American Indians, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, vol. 8, California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 538-549. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
Bean, Lowell John, and Florence Shipek
1978 Luiseño. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, California. R.F. Heizer, ed., pp 550- 563. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Beck, Warren A., David A. Williams
1972 California: A History of the Golden State. Doubleday: New York.
Bolton, Herbert E
1927 Fray Juan Crespí: Missionary Explorer on the Pacific Coast, 1769–1774. HathiTrust Digital Library. Accessed August 15, 2022.
Boscana, Geronimo
1934 A New Original Version of Boscana’s Historical Account of the San Juan Capistrano Indians of Southern California. John P. Harrington, editor. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection 92(4).
Washington, D.C.
Brigandi, Phil
2006 Orange County Place Names A To Z. Sunbelt Publications, Inc., San Diego, California.
Cameron, Constance, Principal Investigator; with P. Maxwell, A. Schroth, T. Cooley, R. Cerreto, L. Santoro and A. Duffield
1986 Archaeological Investigations on the Rancho San Clemente, Orange County, California.
Survey Report OR-0951. For: WSLA Development Company. Prepared by: Archaeological Research Facility, California State University, Fullerton. On file, South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University Fullerton.
Chartkoff, Joseph L., and Kerry Kona Chartkoff
1984 The Archaeology of California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
City of San Clemente
2021 City of San Clemente General Plan. San Clemente's History. http://sanclemente.org/sc/Inf/Plans/General/Wd10.pdf. Accessed Aug 17, 2022. 469
REFERENCES
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 7-2 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Cleland, Robert G.
1941 The Cattle on a Thousand Hills: Southern California, 1850-1870. Huntington Library, San Marino, California.
Crespí, (Fr.) Juan
2001 [1777] A Description of Distant Roads: Original Journals of the First Expedition into California, 1769-1770, by Juan Crespí. Alan K. Brown, ed. And translator. San Diego State University Press.
de Anzá, Juan Bautista.
1776 Diary of Juan Bautista de Anza October 23, 1775 – June 1, 1776. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2009-11-25. University of Oregon Web de Anza. Accessed June 22, 2022 Douglas, R.
1979a Archaeological Site Survey Record, CA-ORA-777. On file, South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University Fullerton.
Douglas, R.
1979b Archaeological Site Survey Record, CA-ORA-788. On file, South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University Fullerton.
Douglas, R., and S. Piper
1978 Archaeological Site Survey Record, CA-ORA-749. On file, South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University Fullerton.
Dumke, Glenn S.
1944 The Boom of the Eighties. Huntington Library, San Marino, California.
Earle, David D., Judy McKeehan, and Roger D. Mason
1995 Cultural Resources Overview of the Little Rock Watershed, Angeles National Forest, California. Prepared for EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. Chambers Group, Inc.
On file, Angeles National Forest, Forest Service Office, Arcadia, California.
Engelhardt, Zephryn, O.F.M.
1931 San Gabriel Mission and the Beginnings of Los Angeles. Franciscan Herald Press, Chicago.
Galvin, Andrew
2011 Santa Ana neighborhood was African American hub. Orange County Register. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Golla, Victor
2007 Linguistic Prehistory. In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, pp. 71–82. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.
Google Earth Pro
2022 Historic Aerial Photographs of the Project Vicinity, taken in 1994, 2002, 2006, 2010, and 2015. Images from Landsat/Copernicus downloaded on October 6, 2022. 470
REFERENCES
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 7-3 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Guinn, J. M.
1915 A History of California and an Extended History of Los Angeles and Environs: Also Containing Biographies of Well-known Citizens of the Past and Present. United States: Historic Record Company.
Gunther, Jane Davies, edited by
1984 Riverside County, California, place names: Their origins and their stories Hardcover. University of California Press; Berkeley and Los Angeles, California.
Howard, W. J., and L. M. Raab
1993 Olivella Grooved Rectangle Beads as Evidence of an Early Period Southern California Channel Island Interaction Sphere. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 29(3):1-
11. HMdb.org
2019 Site of Lily Creamery. The Historical Marker Database. https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=49986. Accessed December 30, 2019.
Johnson, John R., and Stephen O’Neil
2001 Descendants of Native Communities in the Vicinity of Marine Corps Camp Pendleton: An Ethnohistoric Study of Luiseño and Juaneño Cultural Affiliation. Science Applications International: Santa Barbara, California. Submitted to the Unites States Marine Corps, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, San Diego County, California.
Kelsey, Harry
1993 Mission San Juan Capistrano: A Pocket History. Interdisciplinary Research, Inc., Altadena, California.
King, Chester
2017 Takic settlements listed in Franciscan Mission Registers. MS in possession of the author.
Kroeber, Alfred
1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin No. 78, Washington, D.C.
Leiren, Terje I.
1985 Ole and the Reds: The “Americanism” of Seattle Mayor Ole Hanson. Norwegian-American Studies, 30, 75–95. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45221563. Accessed August 17, 2022.
Masters, Nathan
2013 How Orange County Seceded from Los Angeles. KCET. Los Angeles, California. Archived from the original on December 28, 2018. Accessed August 18, 2022.
McCawley, William
1996 The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Malki Museum Press, Banning, California/Ballena Press, Novato, California.
Meadows, Don C.
1966 Historic Place Names in Orange County. Paisano Press, Inc.: Balboa Island, California. 471
REFERENCES
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 7-4 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Merriam, C. Hart
1968 Village Names of Twelve California Mission Records. University of California Archaeological Survey Report 74. Berkeley.
NETR Online
2022 United States Geological Survey topographic maps of the San Clemente, California, quadrangle, prepared in 1949, 1958, 1962, 1970, 1975, 1978, 2012, 2015 and 2018. http://www.historicaerials.com. Accessed August 13, 2022.
NETR Online
2022 Aerial photographs of the San Clemente, California area, taken in 1938, 1946, 1952, 1953, 1967, 1980, 1985, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018. Accessed August 13, 2022. http://www.historicaerials.com.
O’Neil, Stephen
2002 The Acjachemen in the Franciscan Mission System: Demographic Collapse and Social Change.
Master thesis, Department of Anthropology, California State University, Fullerton.
O'Neil, Stephen, and Nancy H. Evans
1980 Notes on Historical Juaneño Villages and Geographical Features. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 2(2):226-232.
Pinney, Thomas
1989 A History of Wine in America from the Beginnings to Prohibition: From the Beginnings to Prohibition. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06224-5. Archived from the original on March 7, 2021. Accessed August 18, 2022.
Piper, S., R. Douglas, and P. Munro
1978 Archaeological Site Survey Record, CA-ORA-747. On file, South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University Fullerton.
Porcasi, Judith F.
1998 Middle Holocene Ceramic Technology on the Southern California Coast: New Evidence from Little Harbor, Santa Catalina Island. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 20:270-284.
San Clemente Historical
2008 History Of San Clemente. San Clemente Historical Society, California. 2008. https://www.sanclementehistoricalsociety.org/history. Accessed August 17, 2022.
Stickle, E., J. Zahniser, R. Douglas and M. Chambers
1979 Project Report – Test-Phase Investigations of the Cultural Resources of Visbeek Ranch, San Clemente, County of Orange, California. Survey Report OR-1885. For: Nu-West Development Corporation, Ltd. Prepared by: Chambers Consultants and Planners. On file, South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University Fullerton.
Strawther, Larry
2012 A Brief History of Los Alamitos and Rossmoor. The History Press, Charleston, South Carolina. 472
REFERENCES
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Page 7-5 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Sutton, Mark Q., Mark E. Basgall, Jill K. Gardner, and Mark W. Allen 2007 Advances in Understanding Mojave Desert Prehistory. In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, Complexity, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, pp. 229-257. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.
True, Delbert L.
1958 An Early Complex in San Diego County, California. American Antiquity 23(3):255-263. 1970 Investigations of a Late Prehistoric Complex in Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, San Diego County, California. Archaeological Survey Monographs 1. University of California, Los Angeles.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
2022 USGS Historic Topographic Map Explorer. Topographic maps developed in 1935, 1949, 1950, 1964, 1972, 1981 and 2018. http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/. Accessed October 5, 2022.
Wallace, William J.
1978 Post-Pleistocene Archeology, 9,000 to 2,000 BC. In Handbook of North American Indians, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, vol. 8, California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 25-36.
Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Warren, Claude N.
1968 Cultural Traditions and Ecological Adaptations on the Southern California Coast. In Archaic Prehistory in Western United States, Cynthia Irwin-Williams (ed.), pp. 1-14. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3). Portales, New Mexico.
Warren, Claude N., and Robert H. Crabtree
1986 Prehistory of the Southwestern Area. In Warren L. D'Azevedo (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 11: Great Basin, pp. 183-193. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
USGS (United States Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior) 1942 San Clemente, Calif. 7.5’, USGS Quadrangle map.
1948 San Clemente, Calif. 7.5’, USGS Quadrangle map.
1949 San Clemente, Calif. 7.5’, USGS Quadrangle map.
1968 San Clemente, Calif. 7.5’, USGS Quadrangle map.
1974 San Clemente, Calif. 7.5’, USGS Quadrangle map.
1975 San Clemente, Calif. 7.5’, USGS Quadrangle map.
1995 San Clemente, Calif. 7.5’, USGS Quadrangle map.
2018 San Clemente, Calif. 7.5’, USGS Quadrangle map.
473
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park
Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
ATTACHMENTS
474
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park
Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
ATTACHMENT A
PROJECT MAPS
475
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment A, Page 1 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Figure 5
PROJECT REGIONAL LOCATION MAP
476
-~ ....
L.lgun.:ri t; --h
s
Cl
Q
Escondido
Disclaimer: Representations on this map or illustration are intended only to indicate locations of project parameters reported in the legend. Project parameter information supplied by others (see layer credits) may not have been independently verified for accuracy by UttraSystems Environmental, Inc. This map or illustration should not be used for, and does not replace, final grading plans or other documents that should be professionally certified for development purposes.
Palh. \\giH'tr'tGIS\Prc;«ts\7179_S.,Clemente_ RicllardT.Steed_MemorialPrk_lS_MN DIMXD1\7179_S.,Clemente_2_0_Regional_Locabon_2022_08_28.tnxd S.IYice L.-~..- Credib. Sou~n E1ri. HERE, Ga11111n, USGS, n tenn ap, f.lCR EMENT P. NRC.-n, Evi Ja~n. METI. Esri China (Hong Kong), E1ri Korea. Esri {Tll allii111 d). NGCC. (cJ OpenStrutMap contrilultlrt. iilnd '1• GIS UHr Community; UltnSy1tem1 En'tironmen!.111, Inc , 2022 Scale: 1 :633,600 N
A
Legend
• Project Location
0 5 10 Miles
0 5.5 11 Kilometers
June 30, 2022
Richard T. Steed
Memorial Park MPU
Regional Location
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment A, Page 2 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Figure 6
PROJECT STUDY AREA
477
Project Location
Disclaimer: Representations on this map or illustration are intended only to indicate kx:ations of project parameters reported in the legend. Project parameter information suppNed by others (see layer credits) may not have been independently verified for accuracy by UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. This map or Illustration should not be used for, and does not replace, final grading plans or other documents that should be professionally certified for development purposes.
Path: \\GissYr\gis\Proiects\7179_SanClemente_ RlchardT.Steed_MemoriaIPrk_lS_MNO\MXOs\7179_SanClemente_3_0_Project_Location_ 2022_06_09.mxd Service layer Credits: Sources. Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, lntermap, INCREMENT P. NRCan, Esri Japan , METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand}, NGCC , (c ) OpenStreeIMap contributors , and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, Gannin, (c) OpenSiree1Map contributors, and lhe GIS user community, Source: Esri, Ma,car, Eanhstar Geographies , and the GIS User Community; UltraSystems En vironmental, Inc., 2022 Scale: 1 :6,000
Legend
c:::J Project Boundary
[ ___ J County Boundary
0 250 500 Feet
0 60 120 Meters
June 09, 2022
Richard T. Steed
Memorial Park MPU
Project Location
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment A, Page 3 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Figure 7
USGS TOPO MAP OF PROJECT STUDY AREA
478
Project
Location
Disclalmer: Representations on this map or illustration are intended only to indicate locations of project parameters rep:n1ed in the legend. Project parameter information supplied by others (see layer credits) may not have been independently verified for accuracy by UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. This map or illustration should not be used for, and does not replace, final grading plans or other documents that should be professionally certified for development purposes.
Path: \\Gissvr\gis\Projects\7179_SanClemenle_RichardT.Steed_MemoriaIPrk_lS_MN D\MXOs\7179_SanC lemente_ 4_5_ Topo_2022_06_09.mxd Service l ayer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE. Garmin, USGS, lntermap, INCREMENT P. NRCan, Esri Japan , METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Kore.a, Esri (Thailand), NGCC , (c) 0p@n5treetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Copyrighl'C 2013 National G@ographic Society, i-cubed : Ca1ifomia Department of Consel'llation, 2019; UltraSystems Environmental. Inc .• 2022
June 09, 2022
Scale: 1 :24,000 N
0 1,000 2,000 Feet
0 250 500 Meters
Legend
c:J Project Boundary
Half-Mile Radius
c.c-_=ce1 Township Boundary
II II Section Boundary
Richard T. Steed
Memorial Park MPU
Topographic Map
USGS Quadrangle: San Clemente
Township: es Range : 7W
Section: 26
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park
Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
ATTACHMENT B
PERSONNEL BACKGROUND
479
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment B, Page 1 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Stephen O’Neil, M.A., RPA
Cultural Resources Manager, Cultural Anthropology/Archaeology Education
M.A., Anthropology (Ethnography emphasis), California State University, Fullerton, CA, 2002 B.A., Anthropology, California State University, Long Beach, CA, 1979 Professional and Institutional Affiliations
California Mission Studies Association
City of Laguna Beach Environmental Sustainability Committee, appointed 2012 Orange County Natural History Museum; Board Member
Pacific Coast Archaeological Society; Board Member and Past President Society of California Archaeology
Professional Registrations and Licenses
Register of Professional Archaeologists (No. 16104) (current) Riverside County, CA, Cultural Resource Consultant (No. 259) (current) Cultural Resource Field Director, BLM Permit (CA-13-19) – California, 2013 NEPA and CEQ Consultation for Environmental Professionals; course by the National Association of Environmental Professionals, 2013
Professional Experience
Mr. O'Neil has 30 years of experience as a cultural anthropologist in California. He has researched and written on archaeology, ethnography, and history. Mr. O'Neil has archaeological experience in excavation, survey, monitoring, and lab work. Most of this has been on Native American prehistoric sites, but also includes Spanish, Mexican, and American period adobe sites. His supervisory experience includes excavation and survey crew chief and project director of an adobe house excavation. He has a wide range of expertise in Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessments, archaeological resource assessment surveys, salvage operations, and cultural background studies for various EIR projects. Mr. O'Neil has worked for cultural resource management firms as well as government agencies and Native American entities. He has prepared technical reports as well as published journal articles.
Select project experience
Inglewood Avenue Corridor Widening Project, City of Lawndale, Los Angeles County, CA: 2013– 2014
Mr. O’Neil directed and conducted archaeological field survey, cultural resource records search, Native American contacts and report writing for this project. The City of Lawndale is widening Inglewood Avenue from Marine Avenue north. The project uses Caltrans funds and the cultural resources report was prepared in Caltrans format. A separate historic properties report was prepared as well. Prepared for Huitt-Zollars Engineering. 480
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment B, Page 2 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Via Ballena Storm Drain Relocation, City of San Clemente, Orange County, CA: 2013 Mr. O’Neil directed and conducted archaeological field survey, cultural resource records search, Native American contacts and report writing for this project. This residential area has a damaged storm drain under Via Ballena that was causing earth movement and erosion. The meet requirements for state funding, and cultural resources inventory report was required. Prepared for the City of San Clemente
Pine Canyon Road – Three Points Road to Lake Hughes Road, Los Angeles County, CA: 2013 Mr. O’Neil directed and conducted archaeological field survey, cultural resource records search, Native American contacts and report writing for this project. This nine-mile portion of Pine Canyon Road lies partially within the Angeles National Forest. A series of widening and culvert repairs is planned by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW). An assessment was made of possible cultural resources, historic and prehistoric that may be affected by the construction, and four historic sites were recorded. Prepared for LACDPW.
Alton Parkway Extension Project, Cities of Irvine and Lake Forest, Orange County, CA: 2012 Mr. O’Neil directed and conducted archaeological and paleontological monitoring, archaeological excavation, cultural resource records search, Native American contacts and report writing for this project. Alton Parkway was extended 2.1 miles between the cities of Irvine and Lake Forest. For the portion within the City of Irvine, UltraSystems conducted monitoring and excavation services. One prehistoric site was excavated and reported on; a series of living features were discovered and also reported. The final monitoring report described the paleontological and archaeological findings. A separate technical report on the archaeological excavations was also prepared. Mr. O’Neil directed research into historic and prehistoric background, and prepared the final assessment of potential impacts. Prepared for the Orange County Department of Public Works.
NEPA and CEQA Documentation, Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS), Los Angeles County, CA: 2011–2014
Mr. O’Neil is part of UltraSystems team currently preparing technical studies and NEPA and CEQA documentation toward the construction of LA-RICS, an $800-million emergency communications system due to be operational in 2016. LA-RICS will provide a highly coordinated emergency communications system to all first-responders to natural and man-made disasters throughout Los Angeles County. Mr. O’Neil is the cultural and historical resources studies team leader, directing five researchers. These studies include coordination of field visits to all 260-plus locations for an archaeologist and/or an architectural historian with agency escorts to observe and record any onsite prehistoric and historic features, performing records and literature searches at archaeology information centers and local archives, contacting local agencies for historically listed structures and districts, coordinate public notices of the project throughout Los Angeles County, consultation with the NAHC and all local tribal organizations, and direct consultation with the California State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). This information was compiled by Mr. O’Neil and is used to prepare FCC historical resource forms which were submitted to the SHPO for review.
481
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment B, Page 3 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Megan B. Doukakis, M.A.
Archaeological Technician
Education
M.A. Public Archaeology, California State University, Northridge, 2012–2018 B.A., Anthropology, California State University, Long Beach, 2011 University of California, Los Angeles - Pimu Catalina Archaeological Field School, 2010 International Scholar Laureate Program: Delegation on Anthropology and Archaeology in China, 2009
Earthwatch Institute, “Unearthing Mallorca’s Past” archaeological excavation, Mallorca, Spain, 2005 Professional and Institutional Affiliations
Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society, 2011
Sigma Alpha Lambda, National Leadership and Honor Organization, 2010 Society for California Archaeology Membership 2012–2015 Professional Experience
Mrs. Doukakis has worked in the field of cultural resource management for seven years at environmental firms. Before this Mrs. Doukakis had participated in multiple field schools in Southern California and abroad. She has experience in survey, excavation, laboratory work, and information searches. Mrs. Doukakis holds the title of Archaeological Technician at UltraSystems Environmental.
Prior to this, she completed a CRM internship at UltraSystems. These positions have provided her with the opportunity to contribute to proposals, final reports, project scheduling, archaeological record searches and paleontological, archaeological and Native American monitor organizing for projects.
Select project experience
Results of the Condition Assessment, Site Monitoring, and Effects Treatment Plan (CASMET) Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, San Diego County, CA
Client: Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, Duration: 5/11 to 9/11 Mrs. Doukakis conducted survey and excavation for the USMC Base Camp Pendleton condition assessment project. Areas were tested around Camp Pendleton for the presence and condition of cultural material previously recorded. She also conducted laboratory work and curation for the material collected within excavations. Mrs. Doukakis contributed to the final report with background records searches and prehistoric and historic background writing for the report.
Archaeological Excavation Results Report for the Alton Parkway Extension Project, Orange County, CA
Client: Orange County Department of Public Works; Contract: $357,170, 10/10 to 6/12 Mrs. Doukakis participated in the Alton Parkway project, City of Irvine, Orange County, CA. She was responsible for cleaning and cataloging the artifacts recovered from the excavation and surface collections. She also contributed to the final report by compiling the historical background information.
482
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment B, Page 4 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties ADA Wheelchair Access Ramp Improvement Project, City of Lake Forest, Orange County, CA
Client: City of Lake Forest/Penco, Contract: $2,981.62, Duration: 6/12 to 7/12 Mrs. Doukakis contributed to the cultural resource records search, field survey, Native American contacts and report writing for this project. This residential area required wheelchair access ramps on every corner in this neighborhood. An assessment of the possible cultural resources that may be affected with this construction was made for the City of Lake Forest. Mrs. Doukakis contributed the historic and prehistoric background, and the assessment of the possible resources in the area.
Tenaska Solar Projects Imperial Solar Energy Center–South; Imperial Solar Energy Center– West; and Wistaria Ranch, Imperial County, CA
Client: Tenaska/CSOLAR Development, Contract: $3,441,809, 10/13 to 8/15.
Mrs. Doukakis conducted Native American contacts for field monitoring, coordinated with subcontractors to initiate cultural and paleontological field surveys, for the several solar energy projects being handled by UltraSystems Environmental in the El Centro area, Imperial County, CA.
She contributed different parts of the survey report and monitoring program documents, including historic and prehistoric background, editorial review. At ISEC- West, Mrs. Doukakis was responsible for contacting and organizing Tribal monitors for this project. She contacted tribal organizations and inquired about their interest in providing tribal monitors for this project, directly organized with Native American groups to sign agreements, and fill out tax paperwork. She was also responsible for organizing and keeping track of and gathering field log from monitors from six tribal groups. She also recovered previously recorded artifacts in the field before the start of the project.
NEPA and CEQA Documentation, Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System -Long Term Evolution, Los Angeles County, CA
Client: LARICS Joint Powers Authority, Contract: $3,051,312, 1/12 to 1/15.
UltraSystems’ team prepared technical studies and NEPA and CEQA documentation toward the construction of LA-RICS-LTE, an $800-million emergency communications system that will provide a highly coordinated emergency communications system to all first-responders to natural and man-made disasters throughout Los Angeles County. For this project Mrs. Doukakis conducted record searches at the South Central Coastal Information Center for the Department of Commerce on over 300 project sites throughout the County of Los Angeles. She helped prepare letters to the NAHC and tribal organizations associated with the project area. Mrs. Doukakis contributed to contacting, organizing, and scheduling architectural historians to conduct historical research around the project areas. Letters were written for contact to local agencies and cities. A public notice was constructed and published in three local newspapers. Mrs. Doukakis also constructed hundreds of Federal Communications Commission 620 and 621 forms for submission to California State Historic Preservation Office.
Newton Canyon Monitoring Project, CA
Client: County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Contract: $2,930.00, Duration: 7/13 to 12/13 Mrs. Doukakis was an archaeological monitor for this project. She monitored all ground disturbing activities as well as lightly surveying the area for cultural material. Mrs. Doukakis also conducted the records center research at the South Central Coastal Information Center at CSUF. Through email, letter, and telephone correspondence, Mrs. Doukakis contacted the NAHC and associated tribal groups.
483
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment B, Page 5 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
484
Brent Johnson
Historian
Years of Experience
22 Years with Firm
1 Education
• M.A. History of Science:
California State Un1vers1ty,
Fullerton, 1998
• B.A. History of Science.
UnIvers1ty of California, San
Diego, 1991
Professional
Registrations
• Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation, Section 106
Essentials, Cert1f1cate
• Asbestos Building Inspector.
ln1t1al Course DOSH CA-015-
05, Ce1t1f1cate
8BII0518150008N6786
• Lead Inspector/ Risk Assessor.
Lead-Related Construction
Cert1f1cate ID11 31233
• CPR. First Aid & AED
Certification, Issued
11/12/2015 with Renewal on
11/2017
• RF Safety 101 Cert1f1cat1on.
Issued 12/17/2015
• Remote Pilot Cert1f1cat1on,
,980697. Issued March 2017
• NAUI Cert1f1ed Scuba Diver,
1992
Ultra t m
/
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Mr. Johnson has significant experience in due diligence assessments for a variety of property types and the needs and requirements of a varied number of reporting standards, including ASTM standards, EPA's All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI), and customized client formats. Specifically, Mr_ Johnson has performed Architectural Historian Evaluations, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Environmental Transaction Screens, Defense Environmental Restoration Program for Formerly Used Defense Sites (DERP-FUDS) preliminary environmental assessments, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and california Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Phase I and Phase II assessments, Floodplain Evaluation reports, and Lead and Asbestos Inspections and Sampling.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Architectural Historian Evaluation (DPR 523 Form), Mar Vista Apartments, Port Hueneme CA {2021}
The International Style, Mar Vista Apartments was evaluated to determine whether it is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The building was designed by master architects Roy C. Wilson, John F. Stroh, and George Wilson, AJA. So successful was their architectural practice that by the 1920s few of the buildings constructed on Main Street in Santa Paula were designed by anyone other than Roy Wilson. Prominent architect Roy E. Colbert and apprentice of Wilson and Stroh was interviewed for this project, providing insights into the practical considerations of designing residential, commercial, and industrial architectural for a new community.
CEQA- Laguna Beach Cliff Drive Access, Laguna Beach CA {2018) This cultural resources records search and site visit evaluated the potential impact of Improvements to the public right-<>f-way to include the removal of wood and concrete stairs and a retaining wall, and new construction of a drainage system, slope stabilization, and pedestrian lighting. The assessment determined that the project would not impair the historic viewshed; however, its proximity to the Heisler Park prehistoric encampment, prompted a recommendation for archaeology site monitoring during the demolition phase.
Defense Environmental Restoration Program for Formerly Used Defense Sites {2003- 2004}
Mr. Johnson conducted field investigations and historical research for the Defense Environmental Restoration Program for Formerly Used Defense Sites (DERP-FUDS) to determine the potential for release of hazardous, toxic radioactive waste, munitions constituents, and unexploded ordnance resulting from previous military activities. Extensive archival research and oral historical interviews with veterans were used to identify areas of potential hazard. Mr.
Johnson also assisted in authoring a number of preliminary assessments for the USAGE Los Angeles District including: Van Nuys Army Airfield, CA; Ontario Army Air Field, CA; U.S. Air Force Plant 16 (NASA), CA; U.S. Air Force Plant 14 (NASA), CA; Marquardt Ramjet Development Facility, CA; Pomona Quartermaster Depot, CA; Naval Supply Depot (NSD) Clearfield, UT; Mira Loma Quartermaster Depot, CA; Corona Annex Naval Surface Warfare Center, CA; Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, AZ; and the former Los Angeles Nike Missile Sites located at: Magic Mountain/Lang/Saugus, LA-98, Pointe Vicente (Palos Corporate Office - Orange County
16431 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618-4355
Telephone: 949.788.4900
Facsimlle: 949.788.4901
Website: www.ultrasystems.com
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment B, Page 6 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
485
Brent Johnson Ultra v t m J
Verdes), LA-55, Barley Flats - Mt. Disappointment, LA-09, Van Nuys- Sepulveda, LA-96, Los Pinetos/Newhall, LA-94.
Most recently, Mr. Johnson authored the historic context statement for the Fort Irwin National Training Center In San Bernardino, CA.
FCC NEPA Wireless Telecommunications Sites (2005 - 2016) Mr. Johnson has provided NEPA compliance consulting for the Bechtel Cingular Program, Sprint-Nextel, Verizon Wireless, American Tower Corporation, Global Tower LLC, Cricket Wireless, T-Moblle USA, Horizon Tower LLC, Clearwire, AT&T Mobllity, and MetroPCS environmental contracts, which included over 1,000 sites between 2005 and 2016.
Phase II Cultural Resources Historic Building Inventory, Penmar, Venice CA (201.1} The purpose of the cultural resource survey report for the Penmar Water Quality Improvement and Runoff Reuse Project was to provide an historic architectural assessment for several historic period structures in the city of Venice.
The project induded an architectural history of Venice; Intensive-level evaluation of five historic buildings and determination of eligibility for the California Register of Historical Resources; and an oral presentation of the project methodology and conduslons to the Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering.
Built Environment survey for Sl/verleaf SOiar Project, El Centro CA (2011) The goal of this investigation was to determine whether built environment resources exist within project areas associated with the proposed Silverleaf Solar Project and the associated transmission lfne, and If so, to determine their eligibility for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. The collections of both the South Coast Information Center and the Pioneers Park Museum archives were reviewed, and interviews with the Imperial County Historical Society and resident of 85 years, Mr. Jack Strobel were conducted to establish the historic context of the site and surrounding vicinity. An architectural history of El Centro was written as part of the Introductory material for the report, and during the site walk seven buildings were identified with the area of potential effect. Each building was evaluated using the DPR Primary Record Form and were determined ineligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
Alon Bakersfield Refinery Crude Flexibility Project, Bakersfield CA (201.3) Proposed Improvements to the 427--acre Alon Bakersfield Oil Refinery, which included the expansion of railroad, transfer and storage facilities, and process units, presented a potential impact to a historic refinery that may have significance to the early development of the petroleum Industry In California. A direct assessment of four historicperiod (circa 1940) buildings including the original laboratory, fire house, maintenance and planning building. and warehouse was conducted using the DPRS23 form set. It was determined that the buildings were ineligible for the NR, CR, or Local designation and a status code of 62 was assigned to each building.
USC Historic Campus - Crown Castle DAS Communications Project, Los Angeles CA (201.3) The Crown Castle development of eight externally-mounted DAS wireless antennas within the historic core of the USC campus required an evaluation of potentia l impacts to the USC Historic District. Direct assessments using the DPR Primary Record and Building. Structure, and Object Record forms were performed for the Social Science Building. designed by Edward Durell Stone; Booth Ferris Rehearsal Hall, designed by William L. Pereira; Neely Petroleum & Chemical Engineering Building. designed by Smith, Powell & Morgridge; Edward L Doheny Jr. Memorial Library, designed by Samuel E. Lunden; Robert Glenn Rapp Engineering Building. designed by Smith, Powell & Morgridge; Physical Education Building. designed by Parkinson & Parkinson; and the Norris Dental Science Center.
Alamitos Parle Project-HSIPL-5108, Long Beach CA (2013) This Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER) and Historic District Evaluation of the Saint Anthony's Parish involved the assessment of approximately SO residential and commercial buildings, in addition to the Saint Anthony's Catholic Parish. The purpose of the report was to determine potential impacts and suggest possible mitigation associated with the development of the proposed Alamitos Park Project. The project involved a records search at the South Central Coastal California Information Center (SCCIC); review of Long Beach City building permits and city directories; a summary of Long Beach historic architecture; and direct assessment of every building older than 45 years within the proposed area of Impact along Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, 6th Street, and 7th Street.
Page2
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park
Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
ATTACHMENT C
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION RECORDS
SEARCH AND NATIVE AMERICAN CONTACTS
486
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 1 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
487
June 10, 2022
Government Program Analyst
Native American Heritage Commission
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100
West Sacramento, California 95691
Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory, Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems Environmental Project No. 7179.
Dear NAHC Staff,
UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. (UEI) has been contracted by the City of San Clemente to conduct a cultural resources inventory in support of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update (Project).
The Project consists of the proposed expansion of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. I am requesting a Native American contact list of interested tribes, organizations and individuals in the general Project area, and a search of the Sacred Lands File for potential traditional cultural sites.
Proposed changes to the park as part of the Master Plan Update would include additional parking, an expanded skateboard park, restroom facilities, pump track facilities, volleyball courts, pickleball courts, an active meadow/multipurpose field, scenic overlook and trellis, outdoor flex classroom/event space, foul ball netting surrounding baseball fields, baseball score board, and stair connection to future parking lot. The current project area has an existing 44 acre park with lighted softball fields, batting cages, food concession and related facilities, a skateboard park with concession building, sand volleyball courts and a children's play area, restroom buildings, a parking lot and a private easement and several SDGE utility easements. This includes approximately 13 acres of underdeveloped park land.
The Project is located along the eastern edge of San Clemente, and is specifically located atthe southwest intersection of Avenida La Pata and Calle Extremo. The site may be found on the San Clemente, Calif, USGS topographical quadrangle, Range 07 West, Township 08 South, in the E ½ of the SW ¼ of Section 26. The project site is surrounded by commercial office buildings, and warehouses to the south and west, open space to the east, and a golf course to the north. This is shown on the enclosed map and the Project area is depicted with a half-mile buffer zone.
If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me.
Thank you for your assistance with this matter.
Respectfully yours,
Stephen O'Neil, M.A., RPA
Cultural Resources Manager
[email protected]
Corporate Office - Orange County
16431 ScientlficWay
Irvine, CA 92618-7443
Telephone: 949.788.4900, ext. 276
Facsimile: 949.788.4901
Website: www.ultrasystems.com
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 2 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
488
Project
Location
Disdaimer: RepresentJtions on this map ex illustmtion are intended only to indicate locations of project parameters reported in the legend. Project parameter information supplied by others (see layer credits) may not have been independently verified for accuracy by UrtroSystems Environmen , Inc. This map or illustration should not be used lex, and does not rep ce, r111al grading plans or other documents 1h31 should be professionally certified for development purp<lSes.
Paih: \'iG:lsslmQ:sl.Projects,\71 7Q_SanCtemente_R.ch.YdT.Steed_Memori.1IPrt_'5_MNOI.MXOs\117D_San~mente_ 4_5_ Topo_2022_06_~.mxd Semce layer Credits. Sources: Esri. HERE, Gannn. USGS, I '"""""• INCREMENT P, NRCa • Esn Japan. METI. Esri Chm (Hong Kong). Esri Korea. Esri and). NGCC. (c) OpenStrutMap eontr.butors, and e GIS User Ccmrrunity. Copyright::C 2013 Nation Geoi,.aphic Society, t<tbed; C.ltiforria Oep.Jrtmtnt of Consttv3tion, 20 f g; UlttaSystems EnffOffllentJI. Inc .. 2022
Scale: 1:24,000
0 1,000 2,000 Feet
0 250 500 Meters
Legend
c::::J Project Boundary
Half-Mile Radius
c--==-=i Township Boundary
II 11 Section Boundary
Richard T. Steed
Memorial Park MPU
Topographic Map
USGS Quadrangle: San Clemente
Township: BS Range: 7W
Section: 26
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 3 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
489
CHAIRPERSON
Laura M iranda
luisei'io
VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagatlng
Chumash
P ARllAMBHARll'l'I
Russell Attebery
Koruk
SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok
COMMISSIONER
WHllam Mungary
Poiute/White Mountain
Apache
COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquei
Ohlone-Costonoon
COMMISSIOHER
Bully McQulllen
YokoyoPomo. YukL
Nomklld
COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseno
COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodrigue,
Kumeyooy
ExECl/1l\lE SECRETARY
Raymonde.
Hitchcock
Miwok/Nisenon
NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
We$! Sacramento,
CollorniO 95691
(9161 373-3710
oobc@nghc cg QOY
NAHC.co.gov
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gwin Nowsom Ger•mer
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
July 20, 2022
Stephen O'Neil
UltraSystems Envronmental
Via Email to: [email protected]
Re: Rlchord T. Steed Memorial Park/ Baron Von WIiiard Dog Park Master Plan Update Project, Orange County
Dear Mr. O'Neil:
A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHCJ Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.
Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; ii they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization Will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consul! with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up With a telephone call or email to ensure that the project Information has been received.
If you receive nolilicalion of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assista nce, we can assure Iha! our lists contain current information.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me al my email address: [email protected].
Sincerely,
Andrew Green
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment
Pagel of 1
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 4 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
490
San Luis Rey Band of Mission
Indians
1889 Sunset Drive
Vista, CA, 92081
Phone: (760) 724 - 8505
Fax: (760) 724-2172
[email protected]
Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair
P.O. Box 391820
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 659 - 2700
Fax: (951) 659-2228
[email protected]
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Isaiah Vivanco, Chairperson
P. 0 . Box487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 654 - 5544
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural
Resource Department
PO. BOX487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 663 - 5279
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Orange County
Luiseno
Cahuilla
Cahuilla
Luiseno
Cahuilla
Luiseno
7/20/2022
This list Is curTent onty as of lhe date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve arry person of statutory responsibility as defined In Section 7050,5 of the Health and Salety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 oflhe Public Resources Code.
This list is only appticable for contacting local Native Ame<icans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Par1< Master Plan Update Projec~ Orange County.
PROJ-2022-
D04341
07/20/2022 02:09 PM 2 of 2
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 5 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
491
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Orange County
Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians
Sonia Johnston, Chairperson
P.O. Box 25628 Juaneno
Santa Ana, CA, 92799
[email protected]
Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians Acjachemen Nation -
Belardes
Joyce Perry, Tribal Manager
4955 Paseo Segovia Juaneno
Irvine, CA, 92603
Phone: (949) 293 - 8522
[email protected]
Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians Acjachemen Nation -
Belardes
Matias Belardes, Chairperson
32161 Avenida Los Amigos Juaneno
San Juan Capisttrano, CA, 92675
Phone: (949) 293 - 8522
[email protected]
Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians Acjachemen Nation 84A
Heidi Lucero, Chairperson
31411-A La Matanza Street Juaneno
San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675
Phone (562) 879 - 2884
[email protected]
La Jolla Band of Luiseno
Indians
Norma Contreras, Chairperson
22000 Highway 76 Luiseno
Pauma Valley, CA, 92061
Phone: (760) 742 - 3771
Pala Band of Mission Indians
Shasta Gaughen, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Cupeno
Rd. Luiseno
Pala, CA, 92059
Phone: (760) 891 - 3515
Fax: (760) 742-3189
[email protected]
7/20/2022
Pauma Band of Luiseno Indians
Temet Aguilar, Chairperson
P.O. Box 369 Luiseno
Pauma Valley, CA, 92061
Phone: (760) 7 42 - 1289
Fax: (760) 7 42-3422
bennaecalac@aol .com
Pechanga Band of Indians
Mark Macarro, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1477 Luiseno
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6000
Fax: (951) 695-1778
[email protected]
Pechanga Band of Indians
Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources
Coordinator
P.O. Box 1477 Luiseno
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6306
Fax: (951) 506-9491
pmacarro@pecha nga-nsn. gov
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson
One Government Center Lane Luiseno
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 7 49 - 1051
Fax: (760) 7 49-5144
[email protected]
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Cheryl Madrigal, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
One Government Center Lane Luiseno
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 297 - 2635
[email protected]
San Luis Rey Band of Mission
Indians
San Luis Rey, Tribal Council
1889 Sunset Drive Luiseno
Vista, CA, 92081
Phone: (760) 724 - 8505
Fax: (760) 724-2172
[email protected]
This list Is curTent onty as of lhe date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve arry person of statutory responsibility as defined In Section 7050,5 of the Health and Salety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 oflhe Public Resources Code.
This list is only appticable for contacting local Native Ame<icans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Par1< Master Plan Update Projec~ Orange County.
PROJ-2022-
D04341
07/20/2022 02:09 PM 1 of 2
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 6 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
492
July 22, 2022
Temet Aguilar, Chairperson
Pauma Band of Luiseno Indians
P.O.Box369
Pauma Valley, CA, 92061
Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory, Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems Environmental Project No. 7179.
Dear Chairperson Aguilar,
UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. (UEI) has been contracted by the City of San Clemente to conduct a cultural resources inventory in support of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update (Project).
The Project consists of the proposed expansion of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems is conducting a cultural resources assessment and records search to evaluate the potential presence of prehistoric and historic resources within the project boundary.
Proposed changes to the park as part of the Master Plan Update would include additional parking, an expanded skateboard park, restroom facilities, pump track facilities, volleyball courts, pickleball courts, an active meadow/multipurpose field, scenic overlook and trellis, outdoor flex classroom/event space, foul ball netting surrounding baseball fields, baseball score board, and stair connection to future parking lot. The current project area has an existing 44 acre park with lighted softball fields, batting cages, food concession and related facilities, a skateboard park with concession building, sand volleyball courts and a children's play area, restroom buildings, a parking lot, a private easement and several SDGE utility easements. This includes approximately 13 acres of underdeveloped park land.
As part of the cultural resources study for the Project, I am writing to request your input on potential Native American resources in or near the Area of Potential Effect (APE). In a letter dated July 20, 2022, the Native American Heritage Commission stated: "A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. [emphasis in the original]." The Commission recommended that local Native American individuals and organizations be contacted for further information, including the Pauma Band of Luiseno Indians. Information on cultural resources in the project study area that the tribe is willing to share with us for the study would be appreciated.
The Project is located along the eastern edge of San Clemente, and is specifically located at the southwest intersection of Avenida La Pata and Calle Extrema. The site may be found on the San Clemente, Calif., USGS topographical quadrangle, Range 07West, Township 08 South, in the E ½ of the SW¼ of Section 26. The project site is surrounded by commercial office buildings, and warehouses to the south and west, open space to the east, and a golf course to the north. This is shown on the enclosed map and the Project area is depicted with a half-mile buffer zone.
If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me.
Thank you for your help.
Respectfully yours,
Stephen O'Neil, M.A., RPA
Cultural Resources Manager
[email protected]
Corporate Office - Orange Courty
16431 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618-7443
Telephone: 949.788.4900, ext.176
Facsimne: 949.788.4901
Websrte: www.ultrasystems.com
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 7 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
493
UltraSy stems envuonmenta 1• ma nagtmtnt• plann1ng
July 22, 2022
Matias Belardes, Chairperson
Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation
32161 Avenida Los Amigos
Sanjuan Capistrano, CA, 92675
Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory, Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems Environmental Project No. 7179.
Dear Chairperson Belardes,
UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. (UEI) has been contracted by the City of San Clemente to conduct a cultural resources inventory in support of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update (Project).
The Project consists of the proposed expansion of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems is conducting a cultural resources assessment and records search to evaluate the potential presence of prehistoric and historic resources within the project boundary.
Proposed changes to the park as part of the Master Plan Update would include additional parking, an expanded skateboard park, restroom facilities, pump track facilities, volleyball courts, pickleball courts, an active meadow/multipurpose field, scenic overlook and trellis, outdoor flex classroom/event space, foul ball netting surrounding baseball fields, baseball score board, and stair connection to future parking lot. The current project area has an existing 44 acre park with lighted softball fields, batting cages, food concession and related facilities, a skateboard park with concession building, sand volleyball courts and a children's play area, restroom buildings, a parking lot, a private easement and several SDGE utility easements. This includes approximately 13 acres of underdeveloped park land.
As part of the cultural resources study for the Project, I am writing to request your input on potential Native American resources in or near the Area of Potential Effect (APE). In a letter dated July 20, 2022, the Native American Heritage Commission stated: "A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. [emphasis in the original]." The Commission recommended that local Native American individuals and organizations be contacted for further information, including the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation. Information on cultural resources in the project study area that the tribe is willing to share with us for the study would be appreciated.
The Project is located along the eastern edge of San Clemente, and is specifically located at the southwest intersection of Avenida La Pata and Calle Extrema. The site may be found on the San Clemente, Calif, USGS topographical quadrangle, Range 07West, Township 08 South, in the E ½ of the SW¼ of Section 26. The project site is surrounded by commercial office buildings, and warehouses to the south and west, open space to the east, and a golf course to the north. This is shown on the enclosed map and the Project area is depicted with a half-mile buffer zone.
If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me.
Thank you for your help.
Respectfully yours,
Stephen O'Neil, M.A., RPA
Cultural Resources Manager
[email protected]
Corporate Office - Orange Courty
16431 Sdentrfic Way
Irvine, CA 92618-7443
Telephone: 949.788.4900, ext.176
Facsimne: 949.788,4901
Website: www.ultrasystems.com
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 8 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
494
July 22, 2022
Heidi Lucero, Chairperson
Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation
31411-A La Matanza Street
San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675
Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory, Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems Environmental Project No. 7179.
Dear Chairperson Lucero,
UltraSysterns Environmental, Inc. (UEI) has been contracted by the City of San Clemente to conduct a cultural resources inventory in support of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update (Project).
The Project consists of the proposed expansion of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems is conducting a cultural resources assessment and records search to evaluate the potential presence of prehistoric and historic resources within the project boundary.
Proposed changes to the park as part of the Master Plan Update would include additional parking, an expanded skateboard park, restroom facilities, pump track facilities, volleyball courts, pickleball courts, an active meadow/multipurpose field, scenic overlook and trellis, outdoor flex classroom/event space, foul ball netting surrounding baseball fields, baseball score board, and stair connection to future parking lot. The current project area has an existing 44 acre park with lighted softball fields, batting cages, food concession and related facilities, a skateboard park with concession building, sand volleyball courts and a children's play area, restroom buildings, a parking lot, a private easement and several SDGE utility easements. This includes approximately 13 acres of underdeveloped park land.
As part of the cultural resources study for the Project, I am writing to request your input on potential Native American resources in or near the Area of Potential Effect (APE). In a letter dated July 20, 2022, the Native American Heritage Commission stated: "A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. [emphasis in the original]." The Commission recommended that local Native American individuals and organizations be contacted for further information, including the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation. Information on cultural resources in the project study area that the tribe is willing to share with us for the study would be appreciated.
The Project is located along the eastern edge of San Clemente, and is specifically located at the southwest intersection of Avenida La Pata and Calle Extremo. The site may be found on the San Clemente, Calif, USGS topographical quadrangle, Range 07West, Township 08 South, in the E ½ of the SW¼ of Section 26. The project site is surrounded by commercial office buildings, and warehouses to the south and west, open space to the east, and a golf course to the north. This is shown on the enclosed map and the Project area is depicted with a half-mile buffer zone.
If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me.
Thank you for your help.
Respectfully yours,
Stephen O'Neil, M.A., RPA
Cultural Resources Manager
[email protected]
Corporate Office - Orange Courty
16431 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618-7443
Telephone: 949.788.4900, ext.176
Facsimne: 949.788.4901
Websrte: www.ultrasystems.com
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 9 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
495
July 22, 2022
Sonia Johnston, Chairperson
Juaneno Band of Mission Indians
P.O. Box 25628
Santa Ana, CA, 92799
Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory, Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems Environmental Project No. 7179.
Dear Chairperson Johnston,
UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. (UEI) has been contracted by the City of San Clemente to conduct a cultural resources inventory in support of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update (Project).
The Project consists of the proposed expansion of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems is conducting a cultural resources assessment and records search to evaluate the potential presence of prehistoric and historic resources within the project boundary.
Proposed changes to the park as part of the Master Plan Update would include additional parking, an expanded skateboard park, restroom facilities, pump track facilities, volleyball courts, pickleball courts, an active meadow/multipurpose field, scenic overlook and trellis, outdoor flex classroom/event space, foul ball netting surrounding baseball fields, baseball score board, and stair connection to future parking lot. The current project area has an existing 44 acre park with lighted softball fields, batting cages, food concession and related facilities, a skateboard park with concession building, sand volleyball courts and a children's play area, restroom buildings, a parking lot, a private easement and several SDGE utility easements. This includes approximately 13 acres of underdeveloped park land.
As part of the cultural resources study for the Project, I am writing to request your input on potential Native American resources in or near the Area of Potential Effect (APE). In a letter dated July 20, 2022, the Native American Heritage Commission stated: "A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. [emphasis in the original]." The Commission recommended that local Native American individuals and organizations be contacted for further information, including the J uaneno Band of Mission Indians. Information on cultural resources in the project study area that the tribe is willing to share with us for the study would be appreciated.
The Project is located along the eastern edge of San Clemente, and is specifically located at the southwest intersection of Avenida La Pata and Calle Extremo. The site may be found on the San Clemente, Calif, USGS topographical quadrangle, Range 07West, Township 08 South, in the E ½ of the SW¼ of Section 26. The project site is surrounded by commercial office buildings, and warehouses to the south and west, open space to the east, and a golf course to the north. This is shown on the enclosed map and the Project area is depicted with a half-mile buffer zone.
If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me.
Thank you for your help.
Respectfully yours,
Stephen O'Neil, M.A., RPA
Cultural Resources Manager
[email protected]
Corporate Office - Orange Courty
16431 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618-7443
Telephone: 949.788.4900, ext.176
Facsimne: 949.788.4901
Websrte: www.ultrasystems.com
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 10 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
496
July 22, 2022
Mark Macarro, Chairperson
Pechanga Band of Indians
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA, 92593
Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory, Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems Environmental Project No. 7179.
Dear Chairperson Macarro,
UltraSysterns Environmental, Inc. (UEI) has been contracted by the City of San Clemente to conduct a cultural resources inventory in support of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update (Project).
The Project consists of the proposed expansion of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems is conducting a cultural resources assessment and records search to evaluate the potential presence of prehistoric and historic resources within the project boundary.
Proposed changes to the park as part of the Master Plan Update would include additional parking, an expanded skateboard park, restroom facilities, pump track facilities, volleyball courts, pickleball courts, an active meadow/multipurpose field, scenic overlook and trellis, outdoor flex classroom/event space, foul ball netting surrounding baseball fields, baseball score board, and stair connection to future parking lot. The current project area has an existing 44 acre park with lighted softball fields, batting cages, food concession and related facilities, a skateboard park with concession building, sand volleyball courts and a children's play area, restroom buildings, a parking lot, a private easement and several SDGE utility easements. This includes approximately 13 acres of underdeveloped park land.
As part of the cultural resources study for the Project, I am writing to request your input on potential Native American resources in or near the Area of Potential Effect (APE). In a letter dated July 20, 2022, the Native American Heritage Commission stated: "A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. [emphasis in the original]." The Commission recommended that local Native American individuals and organizations be contacted for further information, including the Pechanga Band of Indians. Information on cultural resources in the project study area that the tribe is willing to share with us for the study would be appreciated.
The Project is located along the eastern edge of San Clemente, and is specifically located at the southwest intersection of Avenida La Pata and Calle Extremo. The site may be found on the San Clemente, Calif, USGS topographical quadrangle, Range 07West, Township 08 South, in the E ½ of the SW¼ of Section 26. The project site is surrounded by commercial office buildings, and warehouses to the south and west, open space to the east, and a golf course to the north. This is shown on the enclosed map and the Project area is depicted with a half-mile buffer zone.
If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me.
Thank you for your help.
Respectfully yours,
Stephen O'Neil, M.A., RPA
Cultural Resources Manager
[email protected]
Corporate Office - Orange Courty
16431 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618-7443
Telephone: 949.788.4900, ext.176
Facsimne: 949.788.4901
Websrte: www.ultrasystems.com
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 11 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
497
July 22, 2022
Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources Coordinator
Pechanga Band of Indians
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA, 92593
Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory, Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems Environmental Project No. 7179.
Dear Mr. Macarro,
UltraSysterns Environmental, Inc. (UEI) has been contracted by the City of San Clemente to conduct a cultural resources inventory in support of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update (Project).
The Project consists of the proposed expansion of the Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems is conducting a cultural resources assessment and records search to evaluate the potential presence of prehistoric and historic resources within the project boundary.
Proposed changes to the park as part of the Master Plan Update would include additional parking, an expanded skateboard park, restroom facilities, pump track facilities, volleyball courts, pickleball courts, an active meadow/multipurpose field, scenic overlook and trellis, outdoor flex classroom/event space, foul ball netting surrounding baseball fields, baseball score board, and stair connection to future parking lot. The current project area has an existing 44 acre park with lighted softball fields, batting cages, food concession and related facilities, a skateboard park with concession building, sand volleyball courts and a children's play area, restroom buildings, a parking lot, a private easement and several SDGE utility easements. This includes approximately 13 acres of underdeveloped park land.
As part of the cultural resources study for the Project, I am writing to request your input on potential Native American resources in or near the Area of Potential Effect (APE). In a letter dated July 20, 2022, the Native American Heritage Commission stated: "A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. [emphasis in the original]." The Commission recommended that local Native American individuals and organizations be contacted for further information, including the Pechanga Band of Indians. Information on cultural resources in the project study area that the tribe is willing to share with us for the study would be appreciated.
The Project is located along the eastern edge of San Clemente, and is specifically located at the southwest intersection of Avenida La Pata and Calle Extremo. The site may be found on the San Clemente, Calif, USGS topographical quadrangle, Range 07West, Township 08 South, in the E ½ of the SW¼ of Section 26. The project site is surrounded by commercial office buildings, and warehouses to the south and west, open space to the east, and a golf course to the north. This is shown on the enclosed map and the Project area is depicted with a half-mile buffer zone.
If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me.
Thank you for your help.
Respectfully yours,
Stephen O'Neil, M.A., RPA
Cultural Resources Manager
[email protected]
Corporate Office - Orange Courty
16431 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618-7443
Telephone: 949.788.4900, ext.176
Facsimne: 949.788.4901
Websrte: www.ultrasystems.com
ATTACHMENTS
7179/Richard T. Steed – Baron Von Willard Dog Park Attachment C, Page 12 Cultural Resources Inventory October 2022
498
July 22, 2022
Cheryl Madrigal, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
Rincon Band ofLuiseno Indians
One Government Center Lane
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory, Richard T. Steed Memorial Park/Baron Von Willard Dog Park Master Plan Update, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. UltraSystems Environmental Project No. 7179.