Maintaining an inventory of pavement condition will enhance OCTA’s GIS visualization and analysis capabilities and assist in understanding the transportation investment needs throughout the region. Therefore, a GIS dataset in digital format should be included in this report.
Structure of GIS Data
The GIS dataset must consist of linear geographic features that represent road/street segments. All segments that are part of the report should be included in the GIS dataset. The attribute information of each segment should generally follow the format of the Complete Listing of Current Street Conditions in Appendix B above.
The GIS data requirements are discussed below. Most commercial and open-source GIS software provide industry-standard tools to manage GIS data to meet these requirements.
GIS Digital Data Format
The GIS data must be submitted in either one of the following formats:
x Esri Shapefile, or
x Esri File Geodatabase
Metadata
The GIS data are required to have associated metadata. The minimum metadata items required are:
x Title of Dataset
x Tags (A set of words that can be used by GIS to search for the resource. For example: “pavement”, “transportation”, “roads”)
x Summary (A brief purpose statement of the dataset)
x Description (A brief narrative of the dataset’s content) x Credits (A recognition of those who created or contributed to the resource) Spatial Geometry Type
The spatial geometry of the segment features must be lines that represent the roadway centerline as accurately as possible.
Projection
The GIS data must have spatial reference information and have its coordinate system identified and embedded in or associated with the data file(s). All GIS data submitted to OCTA should be in the following projected coordinate system:
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
Page | 13
x NAD 1983 State Plane California VI FIPS 0406 (US Feet) - More information about this system can be found at: https://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/nad83-california-zone-6-ftus/ GIS Feature Attributes
The required segment attributes are:
x Street name
x Unique segment identifier (Segment ID from original source if available) x Name of intersecting road at the beginning of a segment x Name of intersecting road at the end of the segment
x Current pavement condition index (PCI)
x Current PCI inspection date
x Length of road segment in feet
x Width of road segment in feet
x Paved area of road segment in square feet or square yards x Projected PCI at end of Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Additional attributes such as number of through travel lanes, direction of travel and pavement surface type may be provided. An example of a GIS attribute table for road segments is shown below (Note that there are additional attributes such as surface, functional class, and number of travel lanes).
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
Page | 14
XIV. Appendix D – Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Introduction
When performing data collection in any field, the need for quality control is paramount as it is essential for accurate planning, analysis and design. This is particularly true for collecting pavement distress data for a pavement management system.
The Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan establishes minimum quality standards for performance and procedures for updates of the pavement management system.
NCE’s “Quality Assurance Management Plan” (QAMP) affirms that:
“NCE is dedicated to achieving technical and management excellence and to delivering professional engineering and environmental services that meet or exceed our clients' needs. NCE's Quality Control (QC) Program is designed to achieve these goals. This QA Management Plan (QAMP) describes NCE's QA Program, which is based on four principles: client satisfaction, employee participation, problem prevention, and continuous quality improvements.” NCE's QAMP establishes minimum quality standards for performance and procedures for assuring that our clients receive quality service. It requires the participation of employees at every level. It encourages project managers and technical staff to take pride in their work and responsibility for ensuring that the work is done correctly the first time. The program is designed to reduce the incidence of problems related to quality and results in implementation, where necessary, of corrective actions and modification of work procedures to minimize the incidence of future problems.
Objectives
This document constitutes a formal QA/QC Plan for the County of Orange. It was prepared on 8/1/2023 and last revised on 3/15/2023.
Specifically, it is intended for the 2023 Pavement Management Plan Update. The focus is on the collection of network-level pavement distress data (defined by National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 401 Quality Management of Pavement Data Collection, as “Network-level data collection involves collection of large quantities of pavement condition data, which is often converted to individual condition indices or aggregated into composite condition indices.”)
This document also addresses the QA/QC plan requirements of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)’s “Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines” (section 2.4), adopted in May 2010.
Structure of QA/QC Plan
The following components are addressed in this QA/QC Plan:
x Condition survey procedures used
x Accuracy required for data collection
x Inspector qualifications and experience
x Safety
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
Page | 15
Condition Survey Procedures
The governing document in performing condition surveys for the Enter agency nameis ASTM D6433 “Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Surveys.” Both asphalt concrete (AC) and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are included in this protocol. The following distresses are collected for each pavement type.
Asphalt Concrete AC Pavements
1. Alligator (fatigue) cracking
2. Bleeding
3. Block cracking
4. Bumps and sags
5. Corrugation
6. Depression
7. Edge cracking
8. Joint reflection cracking
9. Lane/Shoulder drop off
10. Longitudinal & Transverse cracking
11. Patching and utility cut patching
12. Polished aggregate
13. Potholes
14. Railroad crossing
15. Rutting
16. Shoving
17. Slippage cracking
18. Swell
19. Weathering
20. Raveling
Portland Cement Concrete (Jointed)
1. Blowup/buckling
2. Corner breaks
3. Divided slab
4. Durability (“D”) cracking
5. Faulting
6. Joint seal damage
7. Lane/shoulder drop off
8. Linear cracking
9. Patching (large) and utility cuts
10. Patching (small)
11. Polished aggregate
12. Popouts
13. Pumping
14. Punchout
15. Railroad crossing
16. Scaling, map cracking and crazing
17. Shrinkage cracks
18. Spalling (corner)
19. Spalling (joint)
Any exceptions to the above procedures are discussed before any surveys are performed. They are documented in the paragraphs below.
[Note to agency: these are usually related to distresses or situations that are not covered in the manuals.
Examples include roller check marks or edge cracking on streets with no curbs and gutters. Others include the raveling of surface seals or the use of open-graded asphalt concrete mixes where the surface appears to have large voids present. Any modifications must be documented and included in this document. Photos are extremely helpful.]
All surveys are performed as semi-automated surveys, and the entire pavement area is inspected. Field crews are typically composed of a two-person crew traveling in a van. The crew will collect and record visual distresses using equipment installed in the van. The safety of field personnel is paramount in all instances.
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
Page | 16
The data will be summarized into sample units that are representative of the entire pavement section. This assumes that the section is homogenous; if it is not homogeneous, then the section must be split according to the criteria agreed upon by the agency. Typically, the criteria used are:
x Pavement condition
x Construction age, if known
x Maintenance history, if known
x Traffic volumes (or functional classification as a surrogate) x Surface types (e.g. asphalt concrete or Portland cement concrete) x Geometric elements (e.g. widths)
Any modifications to the section inventory data are documented in the pavement management report.
A sample unit must be between 2,500 ± 1,000 square feet in conformance with ASTM D6433 protocols. Typical sample unit dimensions are 100 feet long by the width of the street. Streets that are wider than 40 feet wide will have shorter lengths (generally 50 feet) or if they are divided by a raised median, separate sample units will be taken in each direction.
Any pavement areas that are not representative of the section will be noted and surveyed as an additional sample unit.
Accuracy Required for Data Collection
The accuracy required for data collection has two components, both of which are further described in the following paragraphs.
x Re-inspections
x PCI comparisons with past surveys
Random and Systematic Re-Inspections
Random Re-inspections
At least 5% of all inspections are randomly re-inspected by other team members across the following categories:
• Functional classes (i.e. MPAH, locals);
• Surface types (e.g. asphalt concrete or Portland cement concrete); • Pavement conditions (e.g. good, fair, poor);
• Inspectors;
• Geographical areas, if applicable.
A different inspector will review these sites and determine the revised pavement distress measurements. If the initial inspection is determined to be inaccurate, the original inspector is given refresher training before being allowed to continue with any further inspections. Should the data be inaccurate for a certain day, all the data for that day will be re-inspected following refresher training to ensure accuracy.
Systematic Re-inspections
For systematic re-inspections, this could be due to noticed trends such as specific treatment types (e.g. opengraded mixes), a specific inspector or geographical area. In such cases, more than 5% will be re-inspected.
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
Page | 17
Acceptability Criteria
At the time of re-inspection, the actual distresses will be re-inspected and verified, and any corrections made, if necessary. Distress types and severities must be the same and re-measured quantities within ±10% of the original measured quantity.
If corrections are required on more than 10% of the re-inspected sample unit, then an additional 5% will be reinspected. This will continue until more than 95% of the re-inspected sections meet the acceptability criteria.
PCI Comparison with Past Surveys
As another level of quality control, the new PCIs are compared with the previous PCIs. If they differ by more than ±10 PCI points, these sections are automatically flagged for further investigation.
If PCI Increases 10 points
The section is investigated to see if a maintenance and rehabilitation event has occurred since the last survey, but has not been recorded. Typically, it may include activities such as:
• Crack sealing activities – changes medium or high severity cracking to low severity • Patching activities – alligator cracking that has been removed and patched, so that the resultant PCI is increased.
• Surface seals
• Overlay
• Others
Therefore, an up to date maintenance and rehabilitation history file in the pavement management database is desirable, both for historical accuracy as well as to provide additional quality control.
If PCI decreases 10 points
The section is checked to see if the average deterioration rate (usually 3 to 4 points per year) is exceeded. If the drop in PCI is within range of what is acceptable, no further action is required. If the drop is more than the acceptable range, a re-inspection will be performed. The default performance curves in the pavement management software form the basis for what is acceptable.
Inspector’s Qualifications and Experience
The NCE inspectors have attended formal training on pavement condition distress surveys. This training was conducted prior to performing any work using the ASTM D6433 protocols, consistent with OCTA’s requirements.
Inspector Name Date of ASTM D6433 Training Training Conducted By:
Joseph De Leon November 1, 2022 Lisa K. Senn
Franc Escobedo November 1, 2022 Lisa K. Senn
Jonathan Moore November 1, 2022 Lisa K. Senn
Resumes of the technicians utilized on this project are included as an attachment.
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
Page | 18
Safety Procedures
The NCE administers a health and safety program in compliance with the Cal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Title VIII, Section 3203. The program is documented in NCE's Workplace Safety Program Manual.
Generally, the safety procedures include (Edit as applicable to agency):
x Inspectors to wear Class 2 or 3 safety vest at all times; x Flashing beacon on all vehicles utilized for surveys; and x Stopped vehicles to be parked at locations away from moving traffic (e.g. nearby parking, shoulders, etc.).
x For higher volume streets, inspectors will use the sidewalk and or medians, and move in the face of traffic when conducting survey. This will furnish them with more time and provides them with better chances in escaping a dangerous situation involving incoming vehicles.
On streets where there is a high volume of traffic or high speeds, additional measures may be necessary, such as:
x Surveys to occur during off-peak periods or on weekends; x Additional inspector to watch out for traffic; and
x Traffic flaggers in extreme cases.
In extreme cases where it is not possible to walk on the pavement surface, inspections will be performed from sidewalks or raised medians. However, this is extremely rare for city or county roads/streets; this is most often encountered on state highways, and lane closures are the most likely option in that circumstance.
All NCE inspectors are required to take online safety programs annually as administered by “Click Safety.” These classes include:
x Workzone Traffic Safety Tips for Construction.
x Cal Heat Illness Prevention for all Industry Workers. x Cal Person Protective Equipment for Construction.
Attachment – Appendix D: Resumes of Field Inspectors
---End of QA/QC Plan---
Appendix D
Resume of Field Inspectors
1 of 6
Franc Escobedo – Senior Field Technician
Franc has more than 22 years of experience as a pavement management technician for NCE.
He has performed numerous pavement condition inspections throughout California, Idaho and Washington. His experience includes distress collection across various pavement management systems, including the Metropolitan Transportation Commission StreetSaver®, PAVER™, Cartographs, and Hansen systems. Additionally, Franc has completed both the OCTA PAVER™, and MTC “Distress Identification” courses for both asphalt concrete and portland cement pavements and now assists with the training of agency staff on both courses.
Franc performs all activities relating to pavement data collection using hardcopy forms or tablets. As part of the quality control process, he performs cross-checks of data in the PMS database. He regularly performs quality control checks of field collected data and pavement maintenance history to ensure that PMS databases are accurate and up-to-date. During this process, he generates detailed reports that are necessary to perform his cross-checks of the collected data.
Representative Projects
County of Orange Program Management System Updates
Orange County, CA
Engineering Technician. Pavement distress surveyor. Scope includes verifying the road inventory for a road network (674 centerline miles), surveying the roads using ASTM D6433- 11 protocols, updating the maintenance history, developing maintenance strategies, performing multiple budget scenarios, linking to a GIS shapefile, developing a seven-year work plan, and preparing reports. Concurrent with the pavement condition survey, mobile data collection units gathered high-resolution 360-degree geo-referenced right-of-way street level digital imagery along with 3D point cloud data. Assets collected included markings, signs, curb ramps, signals, and drainage features. Work provided from 2009- 2020. Project cost: $2.3 million.
As-Needed Pavement Condition Survey Services, APE15117
City and County of San Francisco, CA
Engineering Technician. Pavement distress surveyor. Since 2016, NCE performed condition surveys on almost 1,000 centerline miles of streets. A particular challenge in 2016 and 2017 was the change in distress protocols when weathering and raveling were split into two different distresses; this resulted in an increase of the PCI, further confirmed by a research study. Project cost: $868,796.
Pavement Management System Updates
City of Berkeley, CA
Engineering Technician. Pavement distress surveyor. NCE is updating StreetSaver® and providing a five-year paving plan for 2018 – 2022. For the first four years the City will select streets for treatment based on criteria identified under Measure M.
Project cost: $49,900.
Education
Computer Operations
Program, Computer
Learning Center, Los
Angeles, CA, 1983-84
Network Engineering &
Administrative Program
Computer Learning Center,
Anaheim, CA, 1997
Certified Network
Administration
Computer Learning Center,
Anaheim, CA 1997
Registrations/Certifications
MTC StreetSaver® Rater
Certification Program
(expires November 2023)
Pre-Qualified for OCTA
(expires 2023)
Joined NCE
2004
Years of Experience
22 years
Appendix D
Resume of Field Inspectors
2 of 6
Pavement Management Update
Sonoma County, CA
Engineering Technician. Pavement distress surveyor. The scope included updating existing pavement management system annually, developing pavement treatment strategies, conducting budgetary analysis, and providing non-pavement needs assessment. Project cost: $823,981.
As-Needed Pavement Engineering Services, San Francisco International Airport (SFIA) City and County of San Francisco, CA
Engineering Technician. Pavement distress surveyor. Since 2011, NCE has provided on-call pavement consultant services on a very complex airfield environment under tight security, conducted forensic analysis on the PCC apron areas, and implemented the PAVER™ PMS. NCE performed the pavement designs for Runway 10R-28L, Plot 40, and Plot 12, determined the structural adequacy and performed mechanistic pavement designs using FAARFIELD for Runways 1L/19R and Taxiways E, F, and L. Determined the ACN/PCN for all runways and taxiways. NCE conducted forensic analysis on a new taxiway exhibiting premature large-scale reflective block cracking and rutting at Boarding Area A and dimpling of Taxiways B and M. NCE designed a high stability asphalt concrete mix to solve this problem. Updated the PAVER™ Airport PMS and performed automated distress surveys as per ASTM D5340. Digital images were collected, and the information was used to update SFIA’s GIS and asset management system. Prepared final reports on the funding and maintenance needs for the next 20 years for the Federal Aviation Administration. NCE is currently providing similar pavement services to SFIA as a subconsultant through 2022. Project cost: $1.2 million.
Pavement Management Inspection
Various Cities and Counties
Agoura Hills East Palo Alto Monterey Santa Monica
Ada County, ID El Centro Monterey County Seal Beach
Agoura Hills Elk Grove Moreno Valley Siskiyou County
Aliso Viejo Encinitas Mountain View Sonoma County
Antioch Fairfield Napa County South Lake Tahoe
Auburn, WA Fremont Newport Beach Stanislaus County
Anaheim Fresno County Oakland Stanton
Bakersfield Fullerton Orange State of Nevada
Baldwin Park Hayward Orange County State of Oregon
Bell Highland Oxnard State of Washington
Brentwood Hillsborough Pacific Grove Thousand Oaks
Buena Park Humboldt County Palm Springs Torrance
Burbank Inyo County Poway Tulare
Camarillo La Habra Redwood City Tuolumne County
Campbell Lake Forest Richmond Tustin
Carmel Las Vegas Rogue River National Forest Umpqua National Forest Carson Lemon Grove San Bruno Vallejo
Chula Vista Livermore San Clemente Vernon
Commerce Mammoth Lakes San Diego County Vista
Contra Costa County Manhattan Beach San Francisco Walnut Creek Corona Marina San Marino West Covina
Cudahy Marin County San Mateo County West Sacramento
Cypress Martinez San Ramon Whittier
Dana Point Mendocino County Santa Barbara Yorba Linda
Diamond Bar Milpitas Santa Cruz
Dinuba Mission Viejo Santa Cruz County
Downey Mono County Santa Maria
Appendix D
Resume of Field Inspectors
3 of 6
Joseph DeLeon – Senior Field Technician
Joseph joined NCE in 2017 as a pavement management technician and is experienced in collecting distress data for pavement management systems. Apart from conducting field inspections, he has performed all functions related to data collection and is an active participant in the quality control process. As part of this process, he performs cross-checks of data in the PMP database. Joseph has performed quality control checks of field collected data and pavement maintenance history to ensure that PMP databases are accurate and up-to-date. During this process, he generates detailed reports, needed to help perform his cross-checks of the data collected.
Representative Projects
Automated Survey / Control Sections
City of San Clemente, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads and arterials in San Clemente, followed by inspection of control sections.
Orange County Automated Survey
City of Dana Point, County of Orange, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads and collectors in Dana Point, Las Flores, North Tustin and Rossmoor.
Automated Survey / Control Sections
City of Manhattan Beach, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads and arterials in Manhattan Beach, followed by inspection of control sections.
Pavement Management Systems
City of Newport Beach, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Conducted windshield inspections on residential, collector and alleyways in Newport Beach.
Distress Data Quality Control
City of West Covina, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Conducted quality control on arterials and collectors in West Covina.
Pavement Management System
City of Santa Barbara, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential, collector and urban arterial streets in Santa Barbara.
Pavement Management System
City of Buena Park, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system.
Inspected urban arterials and residential streets in Buena Park.
Education
Mendocino College
Registrations/Certifications
MTC StreetSaver® Rater
Certification Program
(expires 2023)
Pre-Qualified for OCTA
(expires 2023)
Joined NCE
2017
Years of Experience
5 years
Appendix D
Resume of Field Inspectors
4 of 6
Pavement Management Systems
City of Downey, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential, collector and urban arterial streets in Downey.
Pavement Management System
City of El Cajon, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system.
Inspected urban arterials and residential streets in El Cajon.
Pavement Management System
City of King City, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential, collector and arterial streets in Pacific Grove.
Pavement Management System
City of Pacific Grove, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential and collector streets in Pacific Grove.
Pavement Management System
City of San Buenaventura, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected urban collectors and arterials and residential roads in Ventura.
Pavement Management Systems
City of Santa Ana, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential and collector streets as part of a full network update for Santa Ana.
Pavement Management Systems
City of South Gate, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential, collector and urban arterial streets in South Gate.
Pavement Management Systems
City of Stanton, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected urban arterials in Stanton.
Pavement Management System
City of Torrance, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system.
Inspected urban arterials in Torrance.
Pavement Management Systems
City of Ventura, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential, collector and urban arterial streets in Ventura.
Appendix D
Resume of Field Inspectors
5 of 6
Jonathan Moore – Field Technician
Jonathan joined NCE in 2022 as a pavement management technician and since then, has gained in-depth knowledge and expertise in collecting distress data and coring samples for pavement management systems. Apart from conducting field inspections, Jake performs all functions related to data collection and is an active participant in the QC process, including crosschecks of data in the PMS database, quality control checks of field collected data and pavement maintenance history to ensure that PMS databases are accurate and up to date.
Representative Projects
2022-2023 Pavement Management Updates
City of Anaheim, CA
Field Technician. The City has approximately 584 centerline miles and NCE has been assisting the City with updating the PMP since 2013 including transitioning from PAVER™ to StreetSaver®. Jonathan is assisting with performing distress/condition surveys; collecting both ride quality (International Roughness Index) and digital images of the pavements; identifying missing sidewalk gaps; QC; updating the M&R history; creating shapefiles and KML files with the pavement condition information; performing funding pand budget scenarios; and providing reports and submittals to OCTA. 2022 PMP Update
City of Lemon Grove, CA
Field Technician. NCE is reviewing all public roadways within the City, evaluating and updating the City’s existing Pavement Management Program (PMP), updating existing software used to manage the PMP, provided a capital improvement program (CIP), and CIP budget for the next five years. Jonathan is assisting with updating the City’s database with a field survey from a mechanical and/or visual inspection of each pavement section’s surface distress information and includes surface and subsurface analysis to quantify the street conditions.
As-Needed Consultant Services for Pavement Management and Road Surveying County of San Diego, CA
Field Technician. Covering an area of nearly 1,500 square miles, the County maintains approximately 1,950 centerline miles of roadways. The network is comprised of approximately 1,843 centerline miles of asphalt concrete roadways, with the remainder being exposed cement concrete or unpaved disintegrated granite.
Work/Experience Prior to NCE
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power/Osmose Utility Services, Peachtree City, GA Utility Pole Inspector/Field Technician. Jonathan performed field inspections of utility poles for structural and electrical errors. He logged information into the system and the data was transferred from the IT department to Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, who would send out a crew to mitigate damages and/or potential hazards. During inspections, Jonathan would also utilize measuring equipment and photographed the condition of the poles.
Hampton Tedder Electric Company, Commerce, CA
Quality Control/ Data Entry Technician. Jonathan assisted in transitioning the company’s previous paperwork to a digital database. He served as a liaison between different company locations for the Inspectors and foremen from the North and Education
Post Baccalaureate
Certificate, Geographic
Information Science,
California State University at
Long Beach, 2017
BA, Anthropology, California
State University at Long
Beach, 2017
Registrations/Certifications
Pre-Qualified for OCTA
(expires 2023)
Joined NCE
2022
Total Years of Experience
4 years
Appendix D
Resume of Field Inspectors
6 of 6
Metro regions for logging and prepping paperwork. Jonathan worked closely with Inspectors and foremen to ensure work was performed correctly and efficiently.
City of Downey; Downey, CA
Geographic Information Systems Intern. Jonathan maintained an inventory of maps for the Public Works Department that the Engineers used to perform field repairs and other maintenance the City requested. He assisted with the creation of a database of maps that engineers were able to access, alleviating the need to manually research physical maps. Jonathan used GIS on selected projects to create citywide maps for speed limit, traffic volume, and other operations.
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
Page | 19
XV. Appendix E – Pavement Management Data Files
The Pavement Management data files shall be submitted to OCTA in spreadsheet format. This must include the following information:
x Street name and limits for all public streets
x Street identifiers (Branch ID, Section ID)
x Direction (if applicable)
x Beginning and ending of each section
x Length, widths, and true areas
x Functional Classification (MPAH, Local)
x Number of travel lanes
x PCI and date of inspection
x Type of recommended treatment
x Cost of recommended treatment
x Street geometry as linear features
The Pavement Management data files are attached here on a CD/flash drive, or included as Appendix D
XVI. Appendix F – GIS Maps – Current Conditions (Optional) If included, attach and label Appendix F.
$SSHQGL[ ) &XUUHQW 3&, &RQGLWLRQ
3ULQWHG
&LW\ RI 6DQ &OHPHQWH
7HVW
)HDWXUH /HJHQG
&DWHJRU\ , 9HU\ *RRG
&DWHJRU\ ,, *RRG
1RQ/RDG
&DWHJRU\ ,,, *RRG
/RDG
&DWHJRU\ ,9 3RRU
&DWHJRU\ 9 9HU\ 3RRU