Exhibit E
Master Plan of Arterial Highways
Supporting Documentation
23 Attachment 3
The City of San Clemente will obtain the required MPAH amendment with process used on similar projects including N. El Camino Real, Camino Del Rio, Camino Capistrano, Camino Mira Costa, etc.
The current daily traffic volume on S. El Camino Real, within the project limits, is approximately 7,700 vehicles per day. Future model projections developed for the City’s Centennial General Plan, forecast the same segment to serve between 8,000 and 11,000 vehicles per day in the buildout/longͲrange scenario depending on land use and development patterns that may occur over time. Further south toward the south City limits, forecast traffic volumes are estimated at approximately 5,000 vehicles per day.
As shown in the OCTA MPAH Capacity Values table below, the segment of S. El Camino Real is well under capacity based on current and forecast traffic projections. The City of San Clemente will pursue an MPAH amendment for this portion of roadway to utilize the crossͲsection to better serve alternate modes of travel.
5,000
(LOS A)
8,000
(LOS A)
11,000
(LOS B)
ExistingÆ
Proposed Æ
24 Exhibit F
Bicycle and Pedestrians Safety
Enhancements Supporting Documentation
25 26
Map of Total Collisions
S. El Camino Real from Ave Mendocino to City Limit
Total Vehicle/Pedestrian or Bicyclist =
10 2019 BCIP Call for Project Pedestrian and Bicycle Collision Report South El Camino Real
from Avenida Mendocino to South City Limit
COLLISION_DAT
E
TIME DAY_OF_
WEEK PRIMARY_RD SECONDARY_RD DIST. DIR. WEATHER COLLISION_S EVERITY NUMBER_I NJURED PARTY_ COUNT PCF_VIOL_CATEGORY PCF_VIOLATION TYPE OF COLLISION MVIW PED_ACTION LIGHTING 5/20/2006 725 Saturday SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL AVENIDA DOLORES 98 S Cloudy Injury (Severe) 3 3 Unsafe Speed 22350ͲUnsafe speed for prevailing conditions (use for all prima facie limits). Vehicle/ Pedestrian Pedestrian In Road, Including Shoulder Daylight 9/10/2007 945 Monday SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL AVENIDA MENDOCINO 0 Clear Injury (Other Visible) 1 2 Unknown Sideswipe Bicycle No Pedestrian Involved Daylight 3/28/2008 745 Friday SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL SAN LUIS REY 0 Clear Injury
(Complaintof Pain)
1 2 Pedestrian Right of Way 21950ͲCrosswalks, failure to yield to pedestrians within. Vehicle/ Pedestrian Pedestrian Crossing in Crosswalk at Intersection Daylight 3/5/2009 1830 Thursday SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL AVENIDA SAN LUIS REY 0 Clear Injury (Other Visible) 1 2 Pedestrian Right of Way 21950ͲCrosswalks, failure to yield to pedestrians within. Vehicle/ Pedestrian Pedestrian Crossing in Crosswalk at Intersection DarkͲStreet Lights 3/31/2009 828 Tuesday SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL CRISTIANITOS RD 306 N Clear Injury (Other Visible) 1 2 Improper Turning 22107ͲUnsafe turn, and/or without signalling. Bicycle No Pedestrian Involved Daylight 12/22/2009 1513 Tuesday SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL SAN LUIS REY 0 S Clear Injury (Severe) 2 2 Unsafe Lane Change 21658ͲLaned roadways (2 or
more lanes in direction of travel),
straddling or changing when
unsafe.
Broadside Bicycle No Pedestrian Involved Daylight
1/8/2010 1735 Friday NORTH EL CAMINO REAL CANADA D SAN JOAQUIN 9 S Clear Injury(Complaintof Pain)
1 2 Pedestrian Right of Way 21950ͲCrosswalks, failure to yield to pedestrians within. Vehicle/ Pedestrian Pedestrian Crossing in Crosswalk at Intersection Daylight 2/7/2011 1800 Monday SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL AVENIDA MENDOCINO 5 N Clear Injury (Other Visible) 1 2 Unknown Vehicle/ Pedestrian Pedestrian Crossing in Crosswalk at Intersection DuskͲDawn 3/18/2012 1945 Sunday SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL AVENIDA MENDOCINO 4 N Clear Injury(Complaintof Pain)
1 2 Unknown Vehicle/ Pedestrian Pedestrian Crossing in Crosswalk at Intersection
DarkͲStreet
Lights
6/29/2015 2250 Monday SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL CALLE DEL COMERCIO 589 S Clear Injury (Severe) 1 2 Pedestrian Violation 21954ͲPedestrian yield, upon roadway outside crosswalk. Vehicle/ Pedestrian Pedestrian Crossing Not in Crosswalk DarkͲNo Street Lights 10 Total Collistions Involved Pedestrian or Bicyclist from 2006Ͳ2017:
Data source: SWITRS
I:\cd\Engineering\secure\Transportation\OCTA\Bicycle Corr Imp Program Grant\2018\Traffic Data\Ped & Bike Accident data from TIMS.xlsx 27 PROVEN SAFETY
COUNTERMEASURES
Road Diets
5RDGZD\5HFRQÀJXUDWLRQ
4-LANE Î3-LANE
ROAD DIET
CONVERSIONS
19-47%
Source: Evaluation of Lane Reduction “Road Diet”
Measures on Crashes, FHWA-HRT-10-053.
BEFORE AFTER
Source: City of Orlando, Florida
A Road Diet typically involves converting an existing four-lane undivided roadway to a three-lane roadway consisting of two through lanes and a center two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL).
Benefits of Road Diet installations may include:
An overall crash reduction of 19 to 47 percent.
Reduction of rear-end and left-turn crashes due to the dedicated left-turn lane. Reduced right-angle crashes as side street motorists cross three versus four travel lanes.
Fewer lanes for pedestrians to cross.
Opportunity to install pedestrian
refuge islands, bicycle lanes, on-street
parking, or transit stops.
Traffic calming and more consistent
speeds.
A more community-focused,
“Complete Streets” environment that
better accommodates the needs of all
road users.
A Road Diet can be a low-cost safety
solution when planned in conjunction
with a simple pavement overlay, and the
reconfiguration can be accomplished at
no additional cost. Source: Leidos
A “Road Diet,” or roadway
reconfiguration, can improve
safety, calm traffic, provide
better mobility and access for
all road users, and enhance
overall quality of life.
Reduction in total crashes
SAFETY BENEFIT:
ÎFor more information on this and other FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures, please visit https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures.
FHWA-SA-17-066
Before and after photos of a Road Diet project.
Road Diet project in Honolulu, Hawaii.
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov
28 www.safety.fhwa.dot.gov
FHWA Safety Program
Road Diet
Informational Guide
29 30
31 32
33 34
35
!"# $
%"" " &
'("
)
* +#"%," -
.
)
/
0 "
"
. " 121
34 56789:;< => ?@A5 BCD5 97E;8;FG 87HIJFK< 7H; <L=MF JF E7HJ=N< >JKNH;< JF GLJ< OL79G;HP Q9GJ=FR
3S Q9GJ=F7: M=HTU 7HH=M 7FT <V8W=: 87HIJFK< MJGL T;G7J:< 7< <L=MF JF XJKNH; YZ[3 87V W; N<;TP \]^^_`_a \bcdce_ fgh_i
jN99=HGR
3k C WN>>;H;T WJOVO:; :7F; J< 7 WJOVO:; :7F; GL7G J< <;97H7G;T >H=8 GL; 7Tl7O;FG K;F;H7:[9NH9=<; :7F; =H 97HIJFK :7F; WV 7 97GG;HF => <G7FT7HT :=FKJGNTJF7: 87HIJFK<P mL; WN>>;H 7H;7 8JKLG JFO:NT; OL;EH=F =H TJ7K=F7: 87HIJFK<P mL; WN>>;H 7H;7 MJTGL JFO:NT;< GL; MJTGL => GL; 97H7::;: MLJG; :JF;<P
3Y n7HIJFK< >=H WN>>;H;T WJOVO:; :7F;< 7H; <L=MF JF XJKNH; YZ[opqrZCst qp u7E;8;FG 87HIJFK< O7F T;<JKF7G; 7 WN>>;H 7H;7 W;GM;;F 7 WJOVO:; :7F; 7FT 7Tl7O;FG K;F;H7: 9NH9=<; :7F; 7FTv=H 97HIJFK :7F;P C WN>>;H 7H;7 9H=EJT;< 7 KH;7G;H <;97H7GJ=F W;GM;;F GL; WJOVO:; :7F; 7FT 7Tl7O;FG :7F;< GL7F J< 9H=EJT;T WV 7 <JFK:; F=H87: =H MJT; :7F; :JF;P
Q9GJ=FR
qo C WJOVO:; :7F; WN>>;H 7H;7 87V W; N<;T G= <;97H7G; 7 WJOVO:; :7F; >H=8 7F 7Tl7O;FG K;F;H7:[9NH9=<; :7F; 7FTv=H 97HIJFK :7F;P
wxghag`ay
z{ |^ ]i_a} g ~]^^_` g`_g ~_x__h g ~bcdce_ egh_ gha _h_`ge]`i_ egh_ ` g`bh egh_ i gee ~_ a_ebh_gx_a ~d
h`ge
bx_ ehbx]abhge g__hx g`bhi
¡¢ £t¤ ¥¢t
¦ § ¢ ¢ ¢ ¨ ¢© ¢ ¢ ª« ¢ « ¢t
jN99=HGR
q¬ @FOH;7<;T JFG;HJ=H OL;EH=F =H TJ7K=F7: 87HIJFK >H;N;FOV O7F JFOH;7<; 8=G=HJ<G O=89:J7FO;P Q9GJ=FR
q4 mL; OL;EH=F =H TJ7K=F7: 87HIJFK< 87V W; =8JGG;T >H=8 WJOVO:; :7F; WN>>;H 7H;7< :;<< GL7F q >;;G MJT;P
® ¦ ¯ ¢ © ¢ ¢ ¢ § ¢ ¢¢ t ° ±©¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¯ § ¢ t ° ¢ ¢ ±¢§ ¢ t
² ³ ¢ ¢ ©© ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¥ ¯ ¯ ´ µ¶·ª«¸¶¹ºt
»hx`g^e \bcdce_ fgh_i
jN99=HGR
qY C O=FGH7>:=M WJOVO:; :7F; J< 7F 7H;7 => GL; H=7TM7V T;<JKF7G;T G= 7::=M >=H GL; :7M>N: N<; WV WJOVO:J<G< G= GH7E;: JF GL; =99=<JG; TJH;OGJ=F >H=8 GH7>>JO =F 7 H=7TM7V GL7G 7::=M< GH7>>JO G= GH7E;: JF =F:V =F; TJH;OGJ=FP ¬p n7HIJFK< >=H O=FGH7>:=M WJOVO:; :7F;< 7H; <L=MF JF XJKNH; YZ[op¬rZCst wxghag`ay
¼½ ¾
_`_ ]i_a} g chx`g^e ~bcdce_ egh_ i
gee ~_ g`_a h x
_ e_^x iba_ ^ x`g_e egh_i i x
gx chx`g^e ~bcdce_
x`g_e bi h x
_ e_^x ^ ibh x`g^^bc
¼{ ¾
_`_ ]i_a} g chx`g^e ~bcdce_ egh_ i
gee ~_ i_g`gx_a ^` ibx_ab`_cxbh x`g_e ~d ]i_ ^ g ieba a]~e_ d_ee c_hx_` ebh_ g`bh} g gbhx_a _abgh biegha} ` `gbi_a _abgh biegha ¼¿ ¾
_`_ bhx_`i_cxbh x`g^^bc chx`ei geh x
_ ix`__x _Àbix} Á_} ix ibhi} ^egi
bh eb
x ibhgei} ` x`g^^bc
ibhgeiÂ} g``bgx_ a_bc_i i
gee ~_ `b_hx_a xg`a ~bcdcebixi bh x
_ chx`g^e egh_
¼z à chx`g^e ~bcdce_ egh_ i
gee hx ~_ bhixgee_a h g xgd `gagd
¨¨ ¹ © ¡¢ £t¤ ¢ ©¢ ¢ ¢¯ ¥¢ ¢ ¢ ©¢ © « © t
¨Ä ° © ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¯ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¯¢ ¯ ¢¢ ¢¯ § Å ° ¸ÆÄ·ª ÆÄ·¤º ¢ t Ç¢ ¸Æ·ª Æ·¤º ¯¢ ©©¢ 36
!"# $
%"" " &
'("
)
* +#"%," -
.
)
/
0 "
"
. "
37 Exhibit G
Air Quality Calculations / Justification
38 Bicycle Facilities
Project Name: S.El Camino Real Buffered Bike Lane Project Bicycle paths (Class 1) or bicycle lanes (Class 2) that are targeted to reduce commute and other non-recreational auto travel. Class 1 facilities are paths that are physically-separated from motor vehicle traffic. Class 2 facilities are striped bicycle lanes giving preferential or exclusive use to bicycles. Bike lanes should meet Caltrans' full-width standard depending on street facility type.
Definition:
Annual Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 9,000
Local Government Name: SC San Clemente Use pull
down
menus
Need to know: Funding dollars
Number of operating days per year
Average length of bicycle trips
Average daily traffic volume on roadway parallel to bicycle project City population
Types of activity centers in the vicinity of the bicycle project Length of bicycle project (path or lane)
Class 1 projects: 20 years
Class 2 projects: 15 years
Days (D): 200 days of use/year Consider local climate.
Average Length (L) of bicycle trips: 1.10 Miles per trip in one direction Default based on NPTS.
Trips per day
Two-direction traffic volumes on roadway parallel to bike project.
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
BIKE FACILITY
CLASS
AVERAGE DAILY
TRAFFIC (ADT)
LENGTH OF BIKE
PROJECT (IN ONE
DIRECTION)
ADJUSTMENT
FACTORS FOR CITIES
WITH
POPULATION>250,000
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
FOR UNIVERSITY TOWNS
WITH
POPULATION<250,000
*and non-university towns < 250,000
Class 1 ( path)
and
Class 2 (lane)
Class 2 (lane)
ADT < 12,000 vehicles
per day
12,000<ADT<24,000
vehicles per day
24,000<ADT<30,000
vehicles per day
<1 mile
>1 and <2 miles
> 2 miles
.0019
.0029
.0038
.0014
.0020
.0027
.0010
.0014
.0019
.0104
.0155
.0207
.0073
.0109
.0145
.0052
.0078
MAXIMUM IS 30,000 .0104
MAXIMUM IS 30,000
Class 1 ( path)
and
Class 2 (lane)
<1 mile
>1 and <2 miles
> 2 miles
<1 mile
>1 and <2 miles
> 2 miles
Please use descriptive project name that fits in box.
Motor Vehicle Funding (MVFees): $0 dollars
15 years
CMAQ Funding (CMAQ): $0 dollars
Moyer Funding (Moyer): $0 dollars
Other CoFunding (CoFund): $1,475,765 dollars
Project Life (Life):
Description:
(Issues/Comments)
Reconfigure existing 1.1-mile travel lanes and add buffered zones for existing Class 2 bike lanes on S. El Camino Real.
Implementing Agency: City of San Clemente Is the agency private?:
Category: (8) Bicycles
Subcategory: (8a) Bicycle Lanes and Trails (also bridges) Use pull
down menus.
Number of category must match number of subcategory.
MSRC Funding (MSRC): $0 dollars
Suggested Life Defaults:
(Subvention Funds)
(Discretionary
Funds)
39 Bicycle Facilities
0.555
0.307
0.008
ROG Factor: 0.200
NOx Factor: 0.220
PM10 Factor: 0.051
Emission Factors Auto Trip End Factors
grams
per trip
grams
per
mile
Auto VMT Factors
Adjustment (A) on ADT for auto trips replaced by
bike trips from the bike facility: 0.0155
Use table above. Adjustments are based on facility class, ADT, project length, and community characteristics.
Credit (C) for Activity Centers near the project: 0.0020 Use Activity Centers table below.
Reductions in Reactive Organic Gases (ROG): 54
Reductions in Nitrogen Oxides (NOx): 38
Reductions in Particulates (PM10): 4
Emission Reductions pounds per year
Annual Emission Reductions in pounds per year (ROG, NOx, PM10, and CO/7) = [(Annual Auto Trips Reduced) * (Auto Trip End Factor) + (Annual Auto VMT Reduced * (Auto VMT Factor)]/454 0 0
0 kilograms per day
Daily Emission Reductions in kilograms per day (ROG, NOx, PM10, and CO/7) = Annual Emission Reductions in pounds per year/ (2.2 * 365) TOTAL EMISSION REDUCTIONS: 166 0
When evaluating the impact of a new bike project, it is important to consider the location of the bike facility. What types of destinations are accessible from the project? How many of these activity centers are within one-half mile of the facility? How many are within a quarter of a mile? Examine the activity centers in the vicinity of the project and compare them to the list above. Select the Credit (C) factor that corresponds to the number of activity centers in the surrounding area.
ACTIVITY CENTER CREDITS
Types of activity centers: Bank, church, hospital or HMO, light rail station (park and ride), office park, post office, public library, shopping area or grocery store, university or junior college.
Count your activity centers. If there
are:
Credit (C) Credit (C)
Within 1/2 mile Within 1/4 mile
At least 3
More than 3 but less than 7
7 or more
.0005
.0010
.0015
.0010
.0020
.0030
Annual Auto Trip Reduced 31,500 = (D) * (ADT) * (A + C) Annual Auto VMT Reduced 34,650 = (Annual Auto Trips Reduced) * (L) dollars per lb.
MVFees CE = ((MVFees + MSRC + Moyer) * CRF)/(ROG + NOx + PM10) CMAQ Cost-Effectiveness: $0.00 dollars per lb.
dollars per lb.
CMAQ CE = (CMAQ * CRF)/(ROG + NOx + PM10)
Total CE = ((MVFees + MSRC + Moyer + CMAQ + CoFund) * CRF)/(ROG + NOx + PM10) Cost-Effectiveness
MVFees Cost-Effectiveness: $0.00
Total Cost-Effectiveness: $1,283.55
CO Factor: 4.472 2.338
Reductions in Carbon Monoxide (CO/7): 70 0
dollars per lb.
$0.00 dollars per lb.
dollars per lb.
$0.00
$744.12
Based on ROG + NOx + PM10 Based on ROG + NOx + PM10 + CO/7 For average auto
emission factors,
see Emission
Factors Menu,
Table 3. For Class
2 facilities use
factors for 11-15
years. For Class 1
facilities, use factors
for 16-20 years.
40 Exhibit H
BCIP Agency Resolution
41 42
Attachment 3
RESOLUTION NO._______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
CLEMENTE AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE
BICYCLE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDED WITH
CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FUNDING UNDER THE FIXING AMERICA’S SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR S. EL
CAMINO REAL LANE RECONFIGURATION AND BUFFERED BIKE LANE PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the United State Congress enacted the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Federal Transportation Act on December 4, 2015, which makes Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) funds available to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA); and
WHEREAS, OCTA has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals; and WHEREAS,the City of San Clemente possesses authority to nominate bicycle projects funded using Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funding and to finance, acquire, and construct the proposed project; and WHEREAS, by formal action the City Council authorizes the nomination of S. El Camino Real Lane Reconfiguration and Buffered Bike Lane Project, including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizes the person identified as the official representative of the City of San Clemente to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, rehabilitated, or restored for the life of the resultant facility(ies) or activity; and WHEREAS, with the approval of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and/or OCTA, the City of San Clemente or itssuccessorsin interest in the property may transfer the responsibility to maintain and operate the property; and WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will give Caltrans and/or OCTA'srepresentatives access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the bicycle project; and
WHEREAS,the City of San Clemente will cause project work to commence within six months following notification from the State or OCTA that funds have been authorized to proceed by the Federal Highway Administration or Federal Transit Administration and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence; and
43 Resolution No. Page 2
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente commits (MATCH DOLLAR VALUE) of (MATCHING FUND SOURCE) and will provide(PERCENT LOCAL AGENCY MATCH) of the total project cost as match to the requested (REQUESTED CMAQDOLLAR VALUE) inOCTA CMAQfundsfor a total project cost estimated to be (TOTAL PROJECT COST).
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente may elect to commit additional funds to S. El Camino Real Lane Reconfiguration and Buffered Bike Lane Project to fund an expanded scope which provides additional quantifiable benefits. The City of San Clemente is required to notify OCTA to grant approval prior to commencing on the additional scope; and WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the American with Disabilities Act, Federal Title VI, Buy America provision, and any other federal, state, and/or local laws, rules and/or regulations;
WHEREAS,the City of San Clemente's City Council authorizesthe execution of any necessary cooperative agreements between the City of San Clemente and OCTAto facilitate the delivery of the project; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will amend the agency Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to include the project if selected for funding; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City of San Clemente hereby authorizes Thomas Frank as the official representative of the City of San Clemente to apply for the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funding under the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act for S. El Camino Real Lane Reconfiguration and Buffered Bike Lane Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of San Clemente agrees to fund its share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of November, 2018
ATTEST:
_______________________________ _____________________________ City Clerk of the City of Mayor of the City of
San Clemente, California San Clemente, California
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )§
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
44 Resolution No. Page 3
I, JOANNE BAADE, City Clerk ofthe City of San Clemente, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. _________ was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Clemente held on the _______ day of _______________________, _________, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this _____ day of _________________, ________. ___________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
Approved as to form:
_________________________
City Attorney
i:\cd\engineering\secure\transportation\octa\bicycle corr imp program grant\2018\draftreso.docx 45 Exhibit I
Letters of Support
46 !( $47-534;
&+!
&
&& .! $
-$ %"!$&&! $
$
<43
!!
&-/<59:6
$#'
!
#
##! $ !# !#(
$!#
$!
! #
$
$/$
-
$)$& &!%'""!$&&$ &' ""
&! %' &&
+&&+!
&
&!$! '$% &!!'&
!
'$
%)
! &$& !&!$(
%&!!
$&! !&$(
/ %)
% &
+ "$!($!)+! &! %!$&!'% %!+
%&% '
+/
!'&
!
% "!$& &'%&%!&! $
!$$!$)& +
$%&'$ &%-$%- $
&%/
!$!($-&! &%&!% &% !$!!%
%&!08&!! !$
&$+!!
-
&&& "$!' -
%%&!)!$
!'%%&$%&
%-
!$- !&&! 1%
! &/
'$$ &
+-&$$ !
% !$&!' ! !'&
!
-%!+
%&% '%&
!'"+& &$!&&(
!&$(
&!(!&!!$,! !"$
$%/
!&!$%&%$!& $%%(&!)$+
%&% &&$&
-%"&&"$% !
&"%%
/
!'&!' -
*%&%!($"$&!&$!)+-'&&)'&&$" $!% '"! +
%&%1"&-$& %'%& &
,$+"!& &
+$ &$ &$!)
&+
%&&!&$!'
& !( $%/&+1%"
%!$ )
%)
$ +&&- !&$%%'%-+% & )-'$ &+)&!'&%'"$!
%/
&"&&"$!"!%"$!
&)
!'$+
&$(!
' +! &
$
' $%
$+$!$/
&+
%&$ !' &&$! 5343
47
$!$%! + +
%&%&&5"!"
)$ &"
& %/ "!$& &
+-&!' &
&
$&! !&$(
&& &$%&! !($%& &!%
$% &-%!)
!)&%!'$
!&! ! +
%&%&!!'&
!
/!
!) &
"$!(%
% &( !*%& '%.
,*+*#
&
"#"# )!
(
#%!"#
# "
' +-"$
4; <044/ / 799
%+-
+8 90</ / 449
%+-
+8 709"/ / 448
.
-/.
&+!
&%$(%! &! !$"
' &&$-%$-
!$#'&
+ $$!)+%/
% $% &%-
- $ '
& !
&$ %"!$&&! % !&
'%& &+!$)-'&% %%&+!$
'%$%!&
&$ %"!$&&! &)!$
/$! &' $$!
+%$(&!& )
%%4!
!$&
!
' $!'%'$
% &&+1%
!$!!%-)1$
!!
!$)$&! '
& !
'&'$!$
&/
&'%%&
+$! &!'&
!
! '$&! '$
+
$!
&' &!& * ' !' &"!%%
/
$
+-
$
$-
!' $-
$ 2 +&$%&/!$
&
'+%
*'&($&!$-
$ !' &++
!
&!
"&( '+%2!*/ &
48 Exhibit J
Documents that Include Proposed Project
49 Prepared by
2013
50 Candidate Projects
28 2013
Table 3.4: Candidate El Camino Real Alternatives
Class 3 Bicycle Route Alternative
Enhanced Class 3 Bicycle Route Alternative
Roadway Segment
Length
(Miles) Limits
Avg
Slope
Max
Slope
Install
Sharrows
El Camino Real 2.8 Ave Pico and Calle Del Comercio 3% 5% Yes ,_PZ[PUNWH]LTLU[^PK[O!
»
0UZ[HSS:OHYLK3HUL4HYRPUNZVY¸:OHYYV^Z¹[OYV\NOV\[ *VUULJ[Z[VJVYLJVTTLYJPHSKPZ[YPJ[HUK0
0UJYLHZLIPJ`JSLWHYRPUNIPJ`JSLH^HYLULZZZPNUHNLHUKKPYLJ[PVUHSZPNUHNLHSVUN[OPZYV\[L *VUZPKLYJVTWSL[LZ[LL[ZJVUJLW[ZHSVUN[OPZYV\[L
Roadway Segment
Length
(Miles) Limits
Avg
Slope
Max
Slope
Install
Sharrows
El Camino Real 2.8 Ave Pico and Calle Del Comercio 3% 5% Yes ,_PZ[PUNWH]LTLU[^PK[O!
»
7YVWVZLKHSPNUTLU[!.YLLU3HUL^P[O:OHYLK3HUL4HYRPUNZZPTPSHY[V:LJVUK:[YLL[PU3VUN)LHJO*(;YLH[TLU[HS- lows on-street parking to remain while providing facility for cyclists *VUULJ[Z[VJVYLJVTTLYJPHSKPZ[YPJ[
0UJYLHZLIPJ`JSLWHYRPUNIPJ`JSLH^HYLULZZZPNUHNLHUKKPYLJ[PVUHSZPNUHNLHSVUN[OPZYV\[L *VUZPKLYJVTWSL[LZ[LL[ZJVUJLW[ZHSVUN[OPZYV\[L
Class 2 Bicycle Lane Alternative
Roadway Segment
Length
(Miles) Limits
Avg
Slope
Max
Slope
El Camino Real 2.8 Ave Pico and Calle Del Comercio 3% 5% ,_PZ[PUNWH]LTLU[^PK[O!
»
9VHKKPL[ULLKLK[VHJJVTTVKH[LIPJ`JSLSHULZ,_PZ[PUNMV\Y[YH]LSSHULZHUKVUZ[YLL[WHYRPUNVUIV[OZPKLZ 9VHKKPL[HSPNUTLU[![^V»[YH]LSSHULZVUL»JLU[LY[\YUSHUL[^V »WHYRPUNSHULZ[^V
»IPJ`JSLSHULZ
*VUULJ[Z[VJVYLJVTTLYJPHSKPZ[YPJ[HUK0
0UJYLHZLIPJ`JSLWHYRPUNIPJ`JSLH^HYLULZZZPNUHNLHUKKPYLJ[PVUHSZPNUHNLHSVUN[OPZYV\[L 47(/KLZPNUH[PVUYVHKKPL[VYV[OLYYLJVUMPN\YH[PVU^PSSYLX\PYL6*;(HWWYV]HSMVYJVU[PU\LK4LHZ\YL4M\UKPUN ;VPUJYLHZLLMMPJPLUJ`VMJ`JSPZ[TV]LTLU[ZHSVUN[OPZYV\[LJVTWSL[LZ[YLL[ZJVUJLW[ZLNYV\UKHIV\[ZJHUILJVUsidered as intersection control El Camino Real 0.9 Calle Del Comercio and City limit 1% 3% ,_PZ[PUNWH]LTLU[^PK[O!
»
=HYPL[`VMYVHKKPL[VW[PVUZJHUIL\[PSPaLK[VHJJVTTVKH[L*SHZZMHJPSP[` *VUZPKLYJVTWSL[LZ[YLL[ZJVUJLW[ZHSVUN[OPZYV\[L
*VUULJ[Z[VJVTTLYJPHSKPZ[YPJ[*VUJVYKPH7LKLZ[YPHU)YPKNL;YLZ[SLZHUK0 JYVZZPUNZ^P[OV\[PU[LYJOHUNLZ
0UJYLHZLIPJ`JSLWHYRPUNIPJ`JSLH^HYLULZZZPNUHNLHUKKPYLJ[PVUHSZPNUHNLHSVUN[OPZYV\[L 51 Safe Routes to School
128 2013
Figure 6.1 Candidate SRTS Project Locations
52 City of San Clemente Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 133
Concordia Elementary School
7VSPJLLUMVYJLTLU[ULLKLKHSVUN(]LUPKH+LS7YLZPKLU[LK\L[VKYP]- ers speeding, parking in the bicycle lane and not stopping at stop signs. -PSSPUZPKL^HSRNHWZ^P[OPU[OLíTPSL^HSRPUNKPZ[HUJLMYVT[OLZJOVVS 0U]LZ[PNH[L[OLULLKMVYJYVZZPUNN\HYKZH[(]LUPKH+LS7YLZPKLU[LH[:HU Luis Rey and at the school entrance. Drivers tend to block the crosswalks and do not pay attention to crossing cyclists and pedestrians. 0TWSLTLU[IPJ`JSLSHULWYVQLJ[VU,S*HTPUV9LHS
Implement bicycle route project on San Luis Rey and Avenida Santa Margarita. 4PZZPUNZPKL^HSRZ^P[OPUíTPSL!MLL[
TPSLZ
5VU(+(JVTWSPHU[J\YIYHTWZ^P[OPUíTPSL!
Concordia Elementary
Ave del Presidente
S El Camino Real
Ave Califia
Ave Montalvo
Ave Santa Margarita
Ave San Luis Rey
Vista Azul
Ave Cota
Ave Lobeiro
Calle Ariana
Ave Dolores
Calle del Comercio
Via Rancho
Ave de Las Palmera
Ave Lucia
Ave Costanso
Calle Potro
Ave San Dimas
Ave San Diego
Ave Buena Ventura
Via Adelia
Ave San Fernando
Calle Campesino
Ave Dominguez
Ave Vista del Oceano
Calle Tiburon
Ave Santa Inez
Calle del Establo
Vista Blanca
Ave Carmelo
Ave Pala
Calle Bahia
Calle Isabella
Via Calandria
Calle Potranca
Ave la Costa
Calle Tiara
Ave Amadis
Via Jazmin
Calle de Las Focas
Calle Capri
Ave Santa Margarita
Non-ADA Compliant Curb Ramps
Missing Sidewalks
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Class 1: Bike Path
Class 2: Bike Lane
Class 3: Bike Route
Recommended Bikeways
Class 1: Bike Path
Class 2: Bike Lane
Class 3: Bike Route
Distance from school
1/4 Mile
1/2 Mile
Figure 6.5: Concordia Elementary School
53
!"#
$
%
!"&
54 §¨¦5
§¨¦5
N El Camino Real
Avenida Pico
Coast Hwy
San Juan Creek Rd
S El Camino Real
Avenida la Pata
Camino de Estrella
Del Obispo St
Camino Capistrano
Camino de Los Mares
Valle Rd
Avenida Pico
Avenida del Presidente
Camino Capistrano
Portico del Norte
Calle del Cerro
Avenida Pico
Avenida Vista Hermosa
La Novia Ave
BIKEWAYS MAP
Existing Bike Facilities
Class 1: Bike Path
Class 2: Bike Lane
Class 2: Bike Lane (One Side only)
Class 3: Bike Route
Wide Sidewalks
Recommended Bikeways
Class 1: Bike Path
Class 2: Bike Lane
Class 3: Bike Route
Class 2: Bike Lane One Side Only
Wide Sidewalks
City Boundary
Figure M-3 0 2,500 5,000 1,250 Feet
55 6/30/2015
§¨¦5
S El Camino Real
Avenida
del
Presidente
56 DISTRICT 5
BIKEWAYS FEASIBILITY STUDY
Final Report: August 2015 August 2015 0DUPCFS KOA Corporation 57 2.0 CORRIDOR A: Pacific Coast Highway
DISTRICT 5 BIKEWAYS FEASIBILITY STUDY OCTA – Orange County Transportation Authority KOA Corporation 24 Figure 2.1: Corridor A – Segment Overview Map
58 2.0 CORRIDOR A: Pacific Coast Highway
DISTRICT 5 BIKEWAYS FEASIBILITY STUDY
OCTA – Orange County Transportation Authority KOA Corporation 83 Exhibit 2.25: Corridor A – Segment 25
Name:
x El Camino Real (Avenida Magdalena to San
Clemente east city limits)
Agencies:
x San Clemente
Background:
x This portion of El Camino Real is identified
as a Secondary Arterial on the OCTA Master
Plan of Arterial Highways.
x The average daily traffic volumes along El
Camino Real between Avenida Magdalena to
San Clemente east city limits are 6,000 to
9,000 vehicles according to the OCTA
2013/2014 Traffic Flow Map.
Opportunities:
x The speed limit along El Camino Real is 35
mph.
x This segment of the corridor is a major route
to provide access to San Diego County
Constraints:
x The roadway provides two lanes in each
direction with on-street parking along both
sides of the street.
Figure 2.25: Corridor A – Segment 25
A: Pacific Coast Highway
SEGMENT
25 59
U=UPPER
L=LOWER
Orange County District 5 Bikeway Feasibility Study
Corridor A: Pacific Coast Highway
Conceptual Striping Plan Keymap
1"=1000'
4 / 4
60 41 / 42
0 50' 25'
1'=50'
100' 50'
GRAPHIC SCALE
Seg 25: El Camino Real (Avenida Magdalena to Christianitos Rd) Avenida San Luis Rey to Avenida Lucia, San Clemente, CA I-5 San Diego Fwy
El Camino Real
Avenida San
Luis Rey
Avenida
Santa Inez
Avenida
Dominguez
Segment 25
El Camino Real
I-5 San Diego Fwy
Avenida
San Dimas
Avenida San
Fernando
Avenida Buena
Ventura
Avenida
Dolores
Avenida
San Diego
Avenida Lucia
Segment 25
INSTALL 'ROAD DIET': RESTRIPE TO PROVIDE A
TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE WITH ONE LANE IN
EACH DIRECTION AND CLASS II BIKE LANESRETAIN EXISTING CURBSIDE PARKING INSTALL 'ROAD DIET': RESTRIPE TO PROVIDE A
TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE WITH ONE LANE IN
EACH DIRECTION AND CLASS II BIKE LANESRETAIN EXISTING CURBSIDE PARKING Orange County District 5 Bikeway Feasibility Study
Conceptual Striping Plan
1"=50' Corridor A: Pacific Coast Highway
61 March 2015
KOA Corporation
KTU+A
62 COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY IRVINE
LAGUNA
WOODS
ALISO
VIEJO
LAGUNA
HILLS MISSION
VIEJO
LAGUNA
NIGUEL
DANA
POINT
SAN JUAN
CAPISTRANO
SAN
CLEMENTE
LAGUNA
BEACH
NEWPORT
BEACH
EL TORO
LAGUNA CANYON
CAMINO DE ESTRELLA
AVENIDA VAQUERO
JUNIPERO SERRA
TRABUCO CREEK
WOOD CANYON
ALISO CREEK
GLENWOOD ANTONIO
PACIFIC COAST
LIPAZ A
PACIFIC COAST
GLENNEYRE
FOREST
AVENIDA TALEGA
DEL OBISPO
ALICIA
CLUB HOUSE
MARINA HILLS
SELVA
W
D
A
O
R
B
YA
PACIFIC PARK ALISO VIEJO
CAMINO CAPISTRANO
LA PAZ
NIGUEL
RANCHO VIEJO
EY N VALL OW CR
STONEHILL
OSO MOULTON
HIGHLANDS
DEL R OI
AVERY MARGUERITE
PASEO DE COLINAS
DEL PRADO
BOT CA
EL CAMINO REAL
AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA CAMINO DE LOS MARES VERA CRUZ
AVENIDA LA PATA
CAMINO MIRA COSTA
DOHENY PARK
DANA POINT HARBOR
STREET OF THE GOLDEN LANTERN
CAMINO DEL AVION BEACON HILL
PACIFIC ISLAND
SAN JUAN CREEK
LA PATA
ORTEGA
LA NOVIA
AVENIDA PICO
C
MA NI O LAS RAMBLAS
GREENFIELD 73
5 5
Pacific
Ocean
CORRIDOR A: PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative
PLANNED CORRIDOR
Existing BikewayProposed Bikeway
EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass III
PROPOSED BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass IIISchoolsTransportation CenterRailCity BoundaryDistrict 5 BoundaryParks / Open Space Figure 3-2
Source: OCTA
LEGEND
YA W
D
A
O
R
Connection to Corridor B
Connection to Corridor E Connection to Corridor I Connection to Corridor F Connec on t ti o Corridor H H F I E
B
FORYA W
D
A
Connection to Corridor C
C
Parks within
1/4-mile Served
35 9
Schools within
1/4-mile Served
People within 1/4-mile
Served (approx.)
53K
Of Total
Corridor Length
19miles
Corridor ABikeway Corridor Details1.6 miles of existing Class I4.6 miles of existing Class II7.9 miles of existing Class III Estimated
Project Cost
$11.5-14.1million
63