C I T Y O F H U N T I N G T O N B E A C H
P U B L I C W O R K S E N G I N E E R I N G
D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N C H E C K R E Q U E S T
TO: Traffic Landscaping Water Maintenance
Fire Development Planning Drainage/Sewer
Attention: Steve Bogart
From: Josh McDonald Ext: 5509
Location: 20451 Craimer Lane
File No. Tract 17081 / L16-171
T y p e o f P l a n
Rough Grading Plan
Precise Grading Plan
Site Grading Plan
Street Improvement Plan
Utility Plan Water Sewer SD
Pump Station Flood Sewer
Sewer Study
Hydrology Study
Landscape Plan
Traffic Plan
Water Quality Management Plan
SWPPP
Other –
Kronos Account No.: 17081
Date Received: 12/07/16
* Please submit your response by: 12/29/16
Comments:
1st check 4th check
2nd check 5th check
3rd check _______ check
Plan check has been completed.
Request approval signature on originals
Please check below and return with check print:
No special requirements. OK as is.
All corrections completed. Plans are approved.
Corrections required. See attached check print.
Comments:
Response made by: DMc Engineering
Date: 1/03/2017
*The requested response date is established to provide a reasonable turn around time for the customer and to allow us to coordinate responses from various sections. Please notify us if you are unable to respond by the requested time.
Please see report and redlines for first check comments.
NOTE:
1. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE AS TO HOW ALL
TYPEWRITTEN AND/OR REDLINED PLAN COMMENTS
WERE ADDRESSED.
2. PLEASE RETURN ALL PREVIOUS PLAN CHECKS WITH ANY
RESUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS.
3. CONTACT DEREK J. MCGREGOR, DMc ENGINEERING AT
949.753.9393 OR [email protected] WITH ANY
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS TO THIS REVIEW.
SAMPLE
335
SECTION 6 – PRECISE GRADING PLAN
Comments
1. Refer to redline plans and Grading Checklist for 1st check comments.
2. Refer to comments on the WQMP’s, in particular, the basin and how it functions. In addition, the basin is level and the swales do not meet 1% minimum gradient requirements.
3. The plan has demolition items that should be on the Demolition Plans.
4. The plan contains street sections and handicap details that should be on the Street Improvement Plans.
5. The plan lacks typical side yard sections and their relationship to the building foundation.
6. ADA access and complete ramp details showing grooves and domes are not provided.
SAMPLE
336
Please return this sheet with 1st submittal and subsequent corrected plans Failure to return this sheet with 1st submittal or corrected plans will result in possible delay to plan check process. 1 of 6
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
GRADING PLAN CHECK LIST
Project Address: 20451 Craimer Lane
PW No.: TR 17081 L 16-171 or Tract No.:17801___________ Entitlement No.: GPA 12-02, ZMA 12-01, CUP 12-39, TTM 17801, DR 12-25 & EA 12-01 Building PC No.: 2012-0229
Assessor Parcel No.:155-151-01 Owner / Tel: 714.427.1122 Engineer / Tel: ND ENGINEERING / 909.534.7760
Soils Engineer / Geologist / Tel: NMG GEOTECHNICAL / 949.442-2442 Plan Checker: Steve Bogart
A. GENERAL
Plan Check No.
No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
1 6 Copies of Grading Plans (Prepared on 24”x36” Sheets) to be distributed to all plan checkers.
2 2 Copies of Soils Engineering Report (Review for grading related items, Suitability of site for development, depth of over excavation, thickness of concrete building slab and sand for pad reference from Finish Floor).
2 Copies of Engineering Geologist Report, if applicable R
3 Show Pad and Finish Floor Elevations (Soils Report will State Slab Thickness and Sand Thickness) C
4 Precise Grading Plans Signed By Civil Engineer R
5 Show Project Address, Project PW No., Plan No. (L), Building Plan Check No. (PCL), R.D. No. (Shown in Circle) and Entitlement Nos. – All shown on every sheet of plans.
I
6 North Arrow and Proper Scale (Engineer scale – 10, 20, etc) and Graphic Scale. I
7 Owner’s Name, Address and Telephone No. C
8 Engineer’s Name, Address, Telephone No., RCE No. &
Expiration Date. Check valid registration on Web Site. C 9 Soils Engineer’s Name, Address and Tel. No. Report No. & Date of Report. Engineering Geologist’s Name, Address and Tel., Report No. Reference and Date of Report, if applicable
I
10 “Off-site” (Grading and Improvements requires) Private Property Owner Permission [signature(s) must be notarized] I
¥ or C = Completed
R = Required (Not submitted yet)
N/A = Not Applicable
I = Incomplete (Submitted but wrong/incomplete) SAMPLE
337
Please return this sheet with 1st submittal and subsequent corrected plans Failure to return this sheet with 1st submittal or corrected plans will result in possible delay to plan check process. 2 of 6
No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
11 Cut / Fill / Over-excavation Volumes (Calcs Req’d – if necessary.) R
12 “Revision” box and plan “References” box I
13 Vicinity Map with North Arrow C
14 Bench Mark with current benchmark description. (Most Recent OCS Adjusted) Use benchmark elevation reference
NAVD 88, with year adjusted and year leveled unless
otherwise approved.
R
15 Show Legal Description of property. Alley, corner Dedication (Plan checker to Log status and Start process) C
16 Show Assessor’s Parcel No. (Current Rolls) C
17 Show Notes: General Grading, Fire Dept., AQMD, Cable T.V., NPDES, Dig Alert, Water, Landscape, Traffic and Parking Meter Notification Notes. (AQMD Note not required on SFR Plan). I
18 Signature Blocks including other Agencies, PW, Planning, Fire, Water and Traffic (Show on first sheet of plans) and Public Works Signature Block on every sheet.
C
19 Erosion Control Plan sheet and Notes with name and phone No, of responsible person. (SFR Exempt from Plan, show minor “Erosion Control Notes” only)
C
20 Horizontal Control plan sheet or Adequately Dimensioned Grading Plan. (Must follow approved Site Plan) C
21 Seismicity Report (Alquist Priolo Study) if required. To be reviewed by Third Party Reviewer. I
22 Submit Sewer Study (If required by Conditions) R
23 Obtain copy of Conditions of Approval and Approved Site Plan from (Engineer, Public Works files or Planning Files) I 24 Is a Tract Map of Parcel Map required to be Recorded Prior to Precise Grading Permits? I
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS
No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
25 Topography by a PLS / qualified RCE and –Existing features and text in light line type and Proposed features and text in darker line type for distinction.
C
26 Existing Contours (light lines) / Elevations (light line weight and in Parentheses). 15 feet past boundary line or more to include unusual topography such as water courses, etc
I
27 Location of Buildings, Structures, Trees, Walls, Fences, Landscape Areas (Adjacent development within 15 feet of Property Lines)
C
¥ or C = Completed
R = Required (Not submitted yet)
N/A = Not Applicable
I = Incomplete (Submitted but wrong/incomplete)
SAMPLE
338
Please return this sheet with 1st submittal and subsequent corrected plans Failure to return this sheet with 1st submittal or corrected plans will result in possible delay to plan check process. 3 of 6
¥ or C = Completed N/A = Not Applicable
R = Required (Not submitted yet) I = Incomplete (Submitted but wrong/incomplete) No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
28 Location of all Existing Water, Sewer and Storm Drain Facilities (Public or Private) I
29 Substructures / Overhead Structures/Street Lights/Signs I 30 Show all Existing Easements as applicable. I
31 Location of Oil Wells (API No. and Name) Final Closure Report. All items to come from Fire Dept. N/A
32 Show Property Line Dimensions on plan for all lots & parcels. Include Wharfage Line for Harbour C
33 Show Legend with appropriate references on Grading Sheets. I C. PROPOSED CONDITIONS
No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
34 Finished Grades, Contours (Solid and dark line type) C 35 Spot Elevations C
36 Tops and Toes of slopes I
37 Join Lines (Daylight Lines) – Must be within subject property I
38 Transition Lines (Cut and Fill Line) I
39 Cut and Fill Slopes show all slopes in rate of slope y:x (2:1 Max unless otherwise recommended by Soils Engineer and slope stability calculations are provided)
I
40 Rounding Cut Slopes C
41 No Cut or Fill Slope shall divide Horizontal Property Lines N/A 42 Setbacks to Boundary Lines – Top of Cut slope and Toe of Fill slope, 1’ min. setback, show appropriate sections. I
43 12 inch Berms at Top of Slope for Pad grading and slope protection. I
44 Level Grade Slope (1% min on unimproved surface and A.C.
Paving, 0.5% Min. on Concrete Surface) I
45 Show all Hardscape Improvements and design including Elevations for (Driveways, Walkways, Planters, Landscape Areas, Curb, Gutters, A.C. Paving, Trash Enclosures, Water Meters and Sewers)
I
46 Show Driveway Slopes, 15% Max., Unless Otherwise Approved.
Station CL Commercial driveway using Street Stationing. C
47 Reference All Applicable City Standards & ADA I
48 Provide adequate Sections to Show Adjacent Grading and Improvements, including all property line walls & fences. I
SAMPLE
339
Please return this sheet with 1st submittal and subsequent corrected plans Failure to return this sheet with 1st submittal or corrected plans will result in possible delay to plan check process. 4 of 6
¥ or C = Completed N/A = Not Applicable
R = Required (Not submitted yet) I = Incomplete (Submitted but wrong/incomplete) No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
49 Detail all on-site local depressions or drain inlet aprons. I 50 Construction Notes and Quantities to be shown for all Hardscape improvements, Paving Areas, Sewer, Water and Drainage
Improvements. AC and AB tonnage. Reference construction items on plan that require a separate encroachment permit.
I
51 Retaining Walls, Landscape Walls and Fences Require a separate building permit and must be indicated on plans. I 52 Structural Details Required for Fabrication of Facilities for NonCity Standards I 53 Storm drainpipes shall be RCP, HDPE, SCH 40 PVC, SDR 35 unless otherwise approved. I
54 Use City Standards for Drainage Facilities as Applicable for private drainage systems. Show details of all non-city standard structures.
I
55 Show distance of site to nearest cross street and use street centerline stationing from nearest street intersection for street improvement work location.
I
56 a. Parking Stall Areas: 2 ½” AC / 4” AB; b. Commercial Driveways perimeter drive & loading Areas: 3” AC / 6” AB,
c. Industrial driveways, perimeter drives and loading areas 3” AC / 10” AB, unless other recommendations have been made by the Soils or Structural Engineer.
C
57 Concrete Section for Residential driveways is 5 1/2” min. unless other recommendations have been made be the Soils or
Structural Engineer.
C
58 Show all Proposed Easements as applicable. I
59 Show enlarged details of all Commercial Driveway
Approaches showing elevations, grades and dimensions. I 60 Single Family Residential Development in the Harbor requires elevation of 10.0’ min. Finish Floor elevation for all habitable structures. Based on NAVD 88 Bench Mark Datum. N/A
61 Grading plan must be coordinated with Landscape Architects Plans and show location and height of graded berms and mounding I
D. DRAINAGE
No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
62 2 Hydrology Studies and Hydraulic Calculations (If required by conditions) I
SAMPLE
340
Please return this sheet with 1st submittal and subsequent corrected plans Failure to return this sheet with 1st submittal or corrected plans will result in possible delay to plan check process. 5 of 6
¥ or C = Completed N/A = Not Applicable
R = Required (Not submitted yet) I = Incomplete (Submitted but wrong/incomplete) No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
63 Drainage Plans - Show down spouts, roof drains, outlets, etc. (Commercial Only) private drainage design does not require profiles.
N/A
64 Sub-Drains- Show sub drains for retaining walls and outlets. I 65 Terrace Drains N/A
66 No Drainage Over Slopes of 20% or Greater N/A
67 Concentrated Discharge shall be contained within a suitable concrete structure, channel, gutter etc. C
68 Outlet Structures (indicate Public or Private) sized for drainage discharged. I
69 Down drains for slope protection N/A
70 Show Slopes (S = x.xxxx) Flow lines for Lot Drainage of All Subdrainage Structures C 71 Show Surface Drainage in Percent (x.xx %) I
E. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
78 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and State Notice of Action (NOI) [Site > 1 Acre] Approval required prior to issuance of Grading Permit.
I
79 Site Plan details and BMP details from the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) included on Grading Plan.
Approval of WQMP required for Priority Projects (including New and Significant Harbor Redevelopment SFD “on-water”) prior to issuance of Precise Grading Permit.
I
F. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (AFTER PLAN CHECK COMPLETED) No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
80 6 Sets of Approved Grading Plans
81 Completed Grading Permit Application
82 Fees paid according to City letter to Developer and as shown on the Grading Permit Application.
83 Contractor must have Certificate of Insurance Approved by Risk Management for any work within the Public R/W
G. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (FOR TRACTS ONLY)
No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
84 Engineer’s Estimate with Unit Price and Quantities (Tracts Only) N/A 85 Faithful Performance Bonds $ (Tracts Only) N/A
86 Labor & Material Bond $ (Tracts Only) N/A
SAMPLE
341
Please return this sheet with 1st submittal and subsequent corrected plans Failure to return this sheet with 1st submittal or corrected plans will result in possible delay to plan check process. 6 of 6
¥ or C = Completed N/A = Not Applicable
R = Required (Not submitted yet) I = Incomplete (Submitted but wrong/incomplete) 87 Monument Bond $ (Tracts Only) N/A
88 Rough Grading Plan Signed by Civil Engineer (For Tract Work Only) N/A
H. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (OTHER)
No. Description Consultant 1 2 3
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 96
97 98
99 100 SAMPLE
342
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER DEPT.
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
REVIEW #1
(DATE)
123
1 PROJECT LOCATION AND VICINITY MAPS ARE SHOWN
2 PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS SHOWN
3 CURRENT STANDARD 'WATER NOTES' ARE SHOWN
4 RD, BUILDING PERMIT, PW, L NUMBERS ARE SHOWN
5 FOR REVISIONS: REVISIONS, INCLUDING DATE AND NATURE OF REVISION IS LISTED IN BOX ON TB 6 REFERENCED PLANS ARE LISTED IN THE REFERENCE BOX ON THE TB, INCLUDING PC # AND TITLE 7 IF RESOLUTION 99-34 APPLIES, IS IT SHOWN ON TITLE SHEET, AS WELL AS ALL APPLICABLE SHEETS? 8 FOR PROJECTS THAT HAVE MORE THAN ONE METER, ARE QUANTITY TAKE-OFF'S SHOWN? 123
9 ALL LETTERING IS 0.10 INCH MINIMUM
10 STREET NAMES ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
11 EXISTING EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN WITH APPROPRIATE RECORDED REFERENCES 12 PROPOSED EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN WITH PROPOSED WIDTHS
13 NORTH ARROW AND SCALE ARE SHOWN
14 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES ARE SHOWN AND LABLED
15 CENTERLINE TIE DISTANCE FROM PROJECT TO NEAREST INERSECTION SHOWN 16 WATER MAIN TIE TO CENTERLINE SHOWN
17 PUBLIC V. PRIVATE WORK IS SEPARATED IN THE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 18 SUMMARY OF ALL CONSTRUCTION NOTES WITH QUANTITIES SHOWN 19 CONSTRUCTION NOTES THAT REQUIRE AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ARE LISTED 20 EXISTING WATER MAIN, INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL IS SHOWN 21 EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER SERVICE LINES ARE SHOWN WITH MIN. 2 FEET SEPARATION 22 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS, FIRE SERVICES AND PROPOSED WATER SERVICE LINES ARE SHOWN WITH MIN. 3
FEET SEPARATION
23 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SEWER LATERALS ARE SHOWN WITH MIN. 10 FEET SEPARATION FROM WATER 24 SM COMMERCIAL / MULTI-FAMILY INSPECTION NOTES ARE SHOWN ON PLAN: REFERENCE EXHIBIT 609A 25 SINGLE FAMILY INSPECTION NOTES ARE SHOWN ON PLAN: REFERENCE EXHIBIT 609B 26 WATER FRONT SINGLE FAMILY INSPECTION NOTES ARE SHOWN ON PLAN: REFERENCE EXHIBIT 609C 27 CORRECT CITY STANDARDS ARE REFERENCED IN CONSTRUCTION NOTES 28 THE LAYOUT FOR ADDITION AND/OR REMOVAL OF WATER SERVICES ALONG W/CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND PLAN INFORMATION ARE SHOWN PER COMMERCIAL(609A), RESIDENTIAL (609B) AND WATERFRONT(609C)
REFERENCE EXHIBITS
123
29 WATER METER SIZING WORKSHEET PROVIDED FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE 30 DRAWINGS COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
31 REFERENCE PLANS PROVIDED
32 SPECIAL UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT PROVIDED BY CITY HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND SUBMITTED WITH
NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION
123
33 EASEMENT PROVIDED PER TRACT MAP ARE TECHNICALLY CORRECT 34 LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND EXHIBITS ARE TECHNICALLY CORRECT A. TITLE SHEET
No. Description Plan Check No. Notes
Notes
Notes
Notes
C. GENERAL
No. Description Plan Check No.
D. MAPPING / EASEMENTS
No. Description Plan Check No.
B. PLAN SHEET FOR WATERLINE / METER IMPROVEMENTS
No. Description Plan Check No.
LOCATION: (ADDRESS)
ENGINEERING FIRM : (FIRM NAME)
ENTITLEMENT NO.
PLAN CHECKER: DMc ENGINEERING
FILE NO. (PW 19-041 L 19-178)
CONTACT INFO: (NAME, PHONE)
9 or C = Completed N/A = Not Applicable = Not Completed I:\PROPOSALS\5421 City of San Clemente_On-Call Plan Engineering Plan Check Services\PROPOSAL\working\samples\PC_Water_Cklist SAMPLE
343
CITY OF HB – CHECKLIST DEV’T WATER
ADDRESS: ______________________________________________ REC’D DATE:
PW#: __________________________________________________ TYPE / PROJECT: ________________________________________ APN: __ __ __ -__ __ __-__ __
JN: _________
1. GIS MAP
Distance to centerline ______________
Water mains______________________
Sewer mains __________
2. Meter Details: ______________________________
3. Conditions
4. Photos with meter
5. Photos – 2 streets, up and down *Image date: _____________
6. Tract Map?
7. City comments?
F 8. Field Request?
Sent __________
NOTES:
___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________
DUE DATE
RUDY
ANDREW V.
STEVE EROS
SAMPLE _________
and down *Im
?
S
344
GUIDE FOR BACKFLOW DEVICES
SERVICE TYPE
FIRE SPRINKLERS - SFR DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609B NSFR EX. SFR REMAIN / REMODEL + ADU SUBJECT TO BLDG INSPECTOR / LOCATION SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE FIRE SPRINKLERS WATERFRONT HOME WITH BOAT DOCK DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609C NSFR EX. SFR REMAIN / REMODEL + ADU SUBJECT TO BLDG INSPECTOR / LOCATION SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE FIRE SPRINKLERS WATERFRONT HOME-NO BOAT DOCK DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609C NSFR EX. SFR REMAIN / REMODEL + ADU SUBJECT TO BLDG INSPECTOR / LOCATION SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE ADDING A POOL DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) DETERMINED BY BUILDING DEPT. N/A
BFD TO BE A PART OF POOL PLUMBING PLAN
ANY OF THE ABOVE DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609B / 609C FIXTURE EXCEEDING 20' ABOVE TOP OF LOWESTCURB ELEVATION N/A SUBJECT TO BLDG INSPECTOR / LOCATION SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE FIRE SPRINKLERS DUPLEX / TOWNHOME DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609B NEW DUPLEX /TOWNHOME EX DUPLEX REMAIN / REMODEL + ADU SUBJECT TO BLDG INSPECTOR / LOCATION SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE FIRE SPRINKLERS DUPLEX / TOWNHOME DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609B NEW DUPLEX /TOWNHOME N/A SUBJECT TO BLDG INSPECTOR / LOCATION SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE FIRE SPRINKLERS DUPLEX / TOWNHOME DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609B NEW DUPLEX /TOWNHOME N/A SUBJECT TO BLDG INSPECTOR / LOCATION SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS SIZE DETERMINED BY BLDG DEPT. PIPE CALCS + FIRE CALCS ANY OF THE ABOVE DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609B
FIXTURE EXCEEDING 20' ABOVE TOP OF LOWESTCURB ELEVATION N/A SUBJECT TO BLDG INSPECTOR / LOCATION SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE APARTMENT / MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX DOMESTIC (DEDICATED) 609A NEW MULTI-FAM OR REMODEL N/A 5' FROM ROW AND DIRECTLY BEHIND METER BFD TO MATCH METER SIZEFIRE SPRINKLERS APARTMENT / MULTI-FAMILY FIRE (DEDICATED) 618 NEW MULTI-FAM N/A 5' FROM ROW AND DIRECTLY BEHIND METER BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE ANY OF THE ABOVE DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609A / 618
FIXTURE EXCEEDING 20' ABOVE TOP OF LOWESTCURB ELEVATION N/A SUBJECT TO BLDG INSPECTOR / LOCATION SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE COMMERCIAL / OFFICE / INDUSTRIAL DOMESTIC (DEDICATED) 609A NEW COMMERCIAL OR REMODEL N/A 5' FROM ROW AND DIRECTLY BEHIND METER BFD TO MATCH METER SIZEFIRE SPRINKLER COMMERCIAL/OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL FIRE (DEDICATED) 618 NEW COMMERCIAL > 5,000 SF N/A 5' FROM ROW AND DIRECTLY BEHIND METER BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE ANY OF THE ABOVE DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609A / 618
FIXTURE EXCEEDING 20' ABOVE TOP OF LOWESTCURB ELEVATION N/A SUBJECT TO BLDG INSPECTOR / LOCATION SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANTS FIRE (DEDICATED) 618 ALL CONDITIONS N/A 5' FROM ROW AND DIRECTLY BEHIND METER BFD TO MATCH METER SIZE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION IRRIGATION (DEDICATED) 609A ALL CONDITIONS N/A 5' FROM ROW AND DIRECTLY BEHIND METER SEPARATE METER IF > 2500 SF The following matrix was prepared to clarify some technical and procedural elements relative to the design and construction of SFRRESIDENTIAL DUPLEX / TOWNHOME (DEFINED AS TWO UNITS)RES / MULTI-FAM / APT COMPLEX (DEFINED AS 3+ UNITS)COMMERCIALOTHER APPLICATIONS backflow preventor devices.
This spreadsheet reflects the various conditions and situations and how they apply.
UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS DEV'T TYPE CITY STD. CONDITION WHEN BFP IS REQUIRED CONDITION WHEN BFP NOT REQ'D LOCATION ONSITE J:\JOBS\1252_City of HB On Call Consulting Svcs\REFERENCE\BFD_GUIDE 7.27.22 SAALL CONDITIONS CONDITIONS CONDITIONSDING 20' ABOVE TOP OF LOWEST G 20' ABOVE TOP OF LOWEST IONSAMMODEL 5,000 SF 5,000AMOF LOWESTMPLNN/A MAIN / REMODEL + ADU PLEN / REMODEL + AD N/A N/A N/ALE P SUB SUBJ E P ML AS RE SPRINKLERS WATERFRONT HOME WITH BOAT DOCK DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609C NSFR EX SFR REMAIN / REMODEL + ADU FIRE SPRINKLERS WATERFRONT HOME WITH BOAT DOCK DOMESTIC / FIRE (COMBINED) 609C NSFR EX. SFR REMAIN / REMODEL + ADU 345
&200(5&,$/5()(5(1&((;+,%,7
86(7<3(.62)7&233(5
3(:5$33('
SAMPLE
609
A
346
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH PUBLIC WORKS
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
COMMENTS/
REFERENCE
TITLE SHEET IS SIGNED AND STAMPED BY A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER.
REFERENCE PLANS, REPORTS, MAP AND/OR DOCUMENTS ARE PROVIDED WITH SUBMITTAL.
STREET IMPROVEMENT OR GRADING PLANS ARE PROVIDED SHOIWNG IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PUBLIC ROW LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE.
PLANS ARE DRAWN TO A SCALE OF 1” = 40’ horizontal, 1” = 4” vertical (1” = 8’, or as appropriate for the setup grades).
ALL LETTERING IS 1/10” MINIMUM.
PROJECT LOCATION AND VICINITY MAPS ARE INCLUDED ON THE TITLE SHEET
INDEX MAP IS INCLUDED ON THE TITLE SHEET
LOT BOUNDARY WITH BEARINGS AND DISTANCE IS SHOWN ON THE GRADING OR STREET IMP PLANS
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET
STREET NAMES ARE SHOWN ON THE GRADING OR STREET IMP PLAN
INDEX OF SHEETS IS SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET
EXISTING AND PROPOSED R/W IS SHOWN ON THE GRADING OR STREET IMP PLAN
NORTH ARROW IS SHOWN ON THE GRADING OR STREET IMP PLAN
BASIS OF BEARINGS IS SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET
BENCHMARK IS SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET
(O.C.S. description, date (year of adjustment), NAVD 88 and elevation to three decimal places.)
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT NOTE IS SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET ENGINEERING FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE, DATE OF PREPARATION, SIGNATURE AND REGISTRATION NO. OF LICENSED CIVIL
ENGINEER IS SHOWN ON THE GRADING OR STREET IMP PLAN
SOILS ENGINEER (if applicable), INCL REPORT NO, REPORT DATE, NAME OF FIRM IS SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET THIS NOTE SHALL APPEAR ON GRADING OR STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS: "A REVOKABLE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT (REP) IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION"
ITEMS IN THE ROW ARE NOT OF A NATURE THAT IF REMOVED OR RELOCATED WILL NOT MAKE THE CITY ROW UNSAFE PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, PROPERTY LINES AND/OR CORNERS ARE CLEARLY FLAGGED AROUND THE PROJECT SITE.
PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION, WRITTEN CERTIFICATION SIGNED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR SHALL BE PROVIDED STATING ALL
PROPERTY CORNERS ARE MONUMENTED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY SURVEYOR UNDER PROVISIONS OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
LANDSCAPING PLANS AND IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS. AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FROM PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
STAGING OF ONSITE CONSTRUCTION IS NOT ALLOWED IN THE PROJECT FRONTAGE. ALL STAGING MUST BE OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC ROW. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS CONTAINERS ARE CONSIDERED STAGING ELEMENTS.
CONTRACTOR VEHICLES SHALL BE KEPT OUT OF THE ROW AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE TO ALLOW FOR FLOW OF TRAFFIC AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS.
HARDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRE EXECUTION AND RECORDING OF A REVOCABLE LICENSE AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AGREEMENT. CONTACT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR DETAILS ON EXECUTING THE AGREEMENT. IN ADDITION, AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FROM PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS AT 949.497.0711 FOR DETAILS.
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ANY EXISTING MONUMENTS AND/OR TIES THAT WILL BE DISTURBED BY DEMOLITION AND/OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TIED OUT AND RESET PER REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS.
TIE-IN TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS DIRECT CONNECTION TO PUBLIC STORM DRAIN SYSTEM FOR WATER QUALITY SYSTEMS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. ALL WATER QUALITY DISCHARGES ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE TO BE VISUALLY OBSERVABLE AT THE FINISH SURFACE.
THE PW INSPECTOR MUST BE NOTIFIED OF CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE 72 HOURS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION A. GENERAL
B. STANDARD NOTES REQUIRED ON THE PLAN
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
1 ON IS NOT AL
MATERIASAO
PROVEMENTS ROVEMEN IN THE PUB
E REQUIRED FROM SA
WRITTEN CERTIFICATION WRITTEN CERTIFICAT SIG
ONUMENTED NUM PER THE REQUIRE REQ
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAM
N, PROPERTY LINES AND/OR CO Y LINES AND/OR CO AM
T IF REMOVED OR RELOCATED W ED OR RELOCATED AMPPROVEMENT PLANS: "A REVOKAB PROVEMENT PLANS: "A REVOKA MP
ATE, NAME OF FIRM IS SHOWN ON ME OF FIRM IS SHOW MPL
RATION, SIGNATURE AND REGIS RATION, SIGNATUREPLE
places.) LE P M A S
347
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH PUBLIC WORKS
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
COMMENTS/
REFERENCE PROPERTY ADDRESS:
AC / PCC SAWCUTS ARE SHOWN
LIMITS OF NEW PAVEMENT ARE SHOWN
CURB & GUTTER, DRIVEWAY OR SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT AND/OR CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE THE APPROPRIATE CITY STANDARD (APWA STANDARD PLANS)
ALL ROW ENCROACHMENTS ARE IDENTIFIED
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ANY EXISTING MONUMENTS AND/OR TIES THAT WILL BE DISTURBED BY DEMOLITION AND/OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TIED OUT AND RESET PER REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS.
HALF STREET WIDTH IS SHOWN ON PLANS. WIDTH IS FROM PAVED CENTERLINE (10' FOR LOCALS; 12' FOR COLLECTORS) PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO A PAVEMENT MORATORIUM; PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF STREET SLURRY
EXCEPT FOR CONCRETE AND ASPHALT IMPROVEMENTS, ALL PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE PUBLIC ASPHALT WITH A 12-INCH WIDE CONCRETE BAND
STREET DRAINAGE WILL NOT ENTER PROPERTY
ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM DOES NOT TIE INTO CITY STORM DRAIN DIRECT CONNECTION TO PUBLIC STORM DRAIN SYSTEM FOR WATER QUALITY SYSTEMS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. ALL WATER QUALITY DISCHARGES ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE TO BE VISUALLY OBSERVABLE AT THE FINISH SURFACE.
EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN OR NEW STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS ARE GRANTED HIGH POINT ON DRIVEWAY IS AT LEAST EQUAL TO CURB HEIGHT OR 6 INCHES ABOVE FLOW LINE
IF SIDEWALK EXISTS, NEW SIDEWALK MUST BE ADA COMPLIANT
SIDEWALK CROSSING A DRIVEWAY MUST BE ADA COMPLIANT (I.E. CROSS SLOPE 2% OR LESS)
TREES PROPOSED ADJACENT (WITHIN MATURE CANOPY) TO PUBLIC SIDEWALK OR ROAD INCLUDE ROOT BARRIER
VEHICLE AND PEDESTRAN GATES OPEN AWAY FROM PUBLIC ROW
OFFSITE PARKING PROVIDED PER ZONING (No existing parking; 50 feet lot frontage; additional req. from Zoning) PUBLIC PARKING IS FULLY PAVED WITH ASPHALT OR CONCRETE AND HAS A MAX OF 2% CROSS SLOPE PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO WALLS HAVE 2' ADDITIONAL WIDTH FOR DOOR OPENING "NO PARKING" RESTRICTIONS WAIVED TO REQUIRE NEW PUBLIC PARKING SPACE PARKING SPACES ARE ACCESSIBLE FROM THE DIRECTION OF ADJACENT TRAVEL (I.E. NO BACKING INTO SPACE DUE TO
OBSTRUCTIONS)
EASEMENTS FOR STREET WIDENING AND/OR ON STREET PUBLIC PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN ON PLAN
EASEMENT DOCUMENTS FOR STREET WIDENING AND/OR ON STREET PUBLIC PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND SOILS REPORTS PROVIDED
SEE REDLINES FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
SEE REDLINED TRACT MAP FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
SEE REDLINED EASEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
D. SUMMARY
C. ROW IMPROVEMENTS
2 OMMENTS
ONAL SA
S AND SOILS REPORTS PROVIDE AND SOILS REPORTS PRO
REET WIDENING AND/OR ON STR REET WIDENING AND/OR SAM
AND/OR ON STREET PUBLIC PAR N STREET PUBLIC PA AMPLEE ALLOW ACE.
ANTED
W LINE
E 2% OR LESS) R LESS
WALK OR ROAD INCLUDE ROOT B
feet lot frontage; additional req. from eet lot frontage; additio RETE AND HAS A MAX OF 2% CR D HAS A MAX OF 2%
IONAL WIDTH FOR DOOR OPENIN ONAL WIDTH FOR DOOR OP
RE NEW PUBLIC PARKING SPACE PUBLIC PARKING S
HE DIRECTION OF ADJACENT TRA E DIRECTION OF ADJACENT TR
EL P M A S
348
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
PLAN CHECK LOG
2023-24
1/15/2025
DMc PC # REC'D APN # CITY PC# TYPE ADDRESS DESCRIPTION PC # DUE SENT NOTES CK HRS. ENGINEER PLANNER 1258-219 01/06/25 644-131-34 SB9 1339 Temple Hills Dr Map for Urban Lot Split 1 01/16/25 G. Wank 1258-218 12/05/24 641-163-06 SB9 2395 Temple Hills Dr. Lot Split 1 12/11/24 12/11/25 TPM For SB9 X 2.00 L. SANDBERG G. Wank 1258-215 11/13/24 056-051-65 SB9 31311 Ceanothus Dr Lot split 4 11/20/24 11/19/24 TPM-2024-118 X 0.50 RSM 9 K. Kazama 1258-217 11/06/24 644-024-01 COC 125 St. Ann's 2 11/13/24 11/13/24 COC 2024-2190 X 2.00 A. BROOKS 9 J. Mendoza1258-216 10/17/24 SB9 1190 Morningside Dr Lot Split 2 10/29/24 10/29/24 PM 2024-119 X 3.00 GRAND KNIGHT 9 J. Mendoza1258-217 10/17/24 644-024-08 COC 125 St. Ann's 1 10/28/24 10/29/24 COC 2024-2190 X 2.00 A. BROOKS J. Mendoza 1258-209 10/14/24 641-163-22 TTM 2000 Rim Rock 2 10/25/24 10/25/24 TTM 19316 X 3.00 TOAL M. Caron1258-215 10/07/24 056-051-65 SB9 31311 Ceanothus Dr Lot split 3 10/14/24 10/11/24 TPM-2024-118 X 2.00 RSM K. Kazama1258-216 08/01/24 SB9 1190 Morningside Dr Lot Split 1 08/14/24 08/14/24 PM 2024-119 X 3.00 GRAND KNIGHT J. Mendoza1258-215 08/07/24 056-051-65 SB9 31311 Ceanothus Dr Lot split 2 08/13/24 08/13/24 TPM-2024-118 X 1.50 RSM K. Kazama1258-212B 07/24/24 644-321-31 SB9 1560 Bluebird Canyon Dr FINAL MAP 2 07/29/24 07/29/25 PM 2024-117 X 2.00 A. BROOKS 9 D. Latham 1258-211 07/01/24 641-373-44 ZPC-24-0216 SB9 641 Canyon View Dr Lot Split 3 07/22/24 07/22/25 TPM 2023-198 X 0.50 GRAND KNIGHT 9 K. Kazama1258-212B 06/27/24 644-321-31 SB9 1560 Bluebird Canyon Dr FINAL MAP 1 07/11/24 07/15/24 PM 2024-117 X 3.00 A. BROOKS D. Latham 1258-205 06/26/24 644-122-01 LLA 675 Buena Vista Way Lot Line Adjustment 4 07/09/24 07/09/24 LLA 23-1747 X 0.50 C. RIEHLE W. Jung1258-206 06/26/24 644-142-11 SB9 1385 Terrace Way Existing SFR lot split -no dev't 3 07/08/24 07/08/24 TPM 2023-145 X 2.00 CVC ENG S. Khan1258-205 06/10/24 644-122-01 LLA 675 Buena Vista Way Lot Line Adjustment 3 06/18/24 06/18/24 LLA 23-1747 X 2.00 C. RIEHLE W. Jung1258-210 06/05/24 496-071-35 ZPC-24-0214 SB9 455 Bonvue Terrace Lot Split 3 06/12/24 06/12/24 TPM 2024-122 X 1.50 T. TERWILLIGER 9 K. Kazama 1258-212 06/04/24 644-321-31 SB9 1560 Bluebird Canyon Dr For Lot Split 3 06/11/24 06/11/24 TPM 2024-117 X 1.50 A. BROOKS 9 D. Latham1258-208 06/05/24 656-146-22 COC 435 Ave W Certificate of Compliance 4 06/11/24 06/05/24 COC 2024-0563 X 0.50 A. BROOKS 9 H. Steven1258-214 06/05/24 656-146-24 COC 2695 Nido Way Certificate of Compliance 3 06/11/24 06/05/24 COC 2024-0562 X 0.50 A. BROOKS 9 H. Steven1258-208 05/23/24 656-146-22 COC 435 Ave W Certificate of Compliance 3 05/30/24 05/30/24 COC 2024-0563 X 1.00 A. BROOKS H. Steven 1258-214 05/23/24 656-146-24 COC 2695 Nido Way Certificate of Compliance 2 05/30/24 05/30/24 COC 2024-0562 X 1.00 A. BROOKS H. Steven1258-170-A 05/20/24 641-401-22 PM 1845 Rim Rock Canyon Rd NOT Lot Split 1 05/30/24 05/29/24 PM 2019-162 X 5.00 TOAL J. Mendoza1258-210 05/15/24 496-071-35 ZPC-24-0214 SB9 455 Bonvue Terrace Lot Split 2 05/16/24 05/16/24 TPM 2024-122 X 4.00 T. TERWILLIGER K. Kazama1258-212 05/09/24 644-321-31 SB9 1560 Bluebird Canyon Dr For Lot Split 2 05/22/24 05/22/24 TPM 2024-117 X 2.00 A. BROOKS D. Latham1258-215 05/09/24 056-051-65 31311 Ceanothus Dr NOT for lot split 1 05/20/24 05/20/24 TPM-2024-118 X 4.00 RSM 1258-205 05/01/24 644-122-01 LLA 675 Buena Vista Way Lot Line Adjustment 2 05/08/24 05/08/24 LLA 23-1747 X 2.50 C. RIEHLE W. Jung 1258-212A 04/10/24 644-321-26 1560 Morningside (BBC) NOT for lot split 1R ASAP 04/29/24 REV TO OMIT ALL SB9 0.50 A. BROOKS D. Latham1258-212 04/10/24 644-321-26 SB9 1560 Morningside (BBC) Lot Split 1 04/24/24 04/24/24 1560 BLUEBIRD CYN 3.00 A. BROOKS D. Latham1258-213 04/10/24 496-161-04 P 514 Poplar Street New SFR + ADU 2 04/24/24 04/24/24 PC1 for DMc 2.00 CRF ENG D. Latham1258-208 04/15/24 656-146-22 COC 435 Ave W Certificate of Compliance 2 04/22/24 04/19/24 COC 2024-0563 X 1.50 A. BROOKS H. Steven1258-214 04/15/24 656-146-24 COC 2695 Nido Way Certificate of Compliance 1 04/22/24 04/19/24 COC 2024-0562 X 2.00 A. BROOKS H. Steven1258-211 04/01/24 641-373-44 ZPC-24-0216 SB9 641 Canyon View Dr Lot Split 2 04/15/24 04/15/24 TPM 2023-198 2.00 GRAND KNIGHT K. Kazama1258-206 02/28/24 644-142-11 ZPC-23-1850 SB9 1385 Terrace Way Existing SFR lot split -no dev't 2 03/05/24 03/05/24 PM 2023-145 X 3.00 CVC ENG K. Kazama PAGE 1 OF 3
SAanyon Rd nyon Rd ACertificate of Compliance rtificate of Compliance Certificate of Complian ficate of Complian Certificate of Comp cate Certificate of C Certificate of NOT Lot S T L Lot Sp FoSAMtment FR lot split -no dev't FR lot split -no dev ne Adjustment ustment t Split For Lot Split or Lot SplitAMP S 3L1223143 LP M SA 07/ PLE4 28/24 10/25/24 10/14/24 108/14/24 08/14 08/13/24 07/29/24 07/29/24 07/22/24 07/11/2 EL P /19/2 11/13/24 11/13 10/29/ LE24 10/29/24 10/29/24 10/29/24 10/25/24 10/25/ 10/11/24 08/14/24E08/13/ 07LE P CPM 2 COC 202 TTM 19 TPE 349
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
PLAN CHECK LOG
2023-24
1/15/2025
DMc PC # REC'D APN # CITY PC# TYPE ADDRESS DESCRIPTION PC # DUE SENT NOTES CK HRS. ENGINEER PLANNER1258-211 02/21/24 641-373-44 ZPC-24-0216 SB9 641 Canyon View Dr Lot Split 1 02/29/24 02/29/24 TTM 2023-198 2.00 GRAND KNIGHT K. Kazama 1258-210 02/21/24 496-071-35 ZPC-24-0214 SB9 455 Bonvue Terrace Lot Split 1 02/29/24 02/29/24 TPM X 4.00 T. TERWILLIGER K. Kazama1258-205 02/20/24 LLA 675 Buena Vista Way Lot Line Adjustment 2 LLA 23-1747 - On Hold X C. RIEHLE W. Jung1258-209 02/12/24 641-163-22 TTM 2000 Rim Rock Cyn Rd Proposed 11-Lot TTM 1 02/22/24 02/22/24 TTM 19316 X 4.00 TOAL H. Steven1258-196 02/08/24 SBP 1378 Terrace Way Lot Split 2 02/14/24 02/14/24 X 3.00 J. RAMIMZADEH 1258-208 02/01/24 656-146-22 COC 435 Avenue W Certificate of Compliance 1 02/07/24 02/08/24 No structures / Vacant lot(s) X 2.00 A. BROOKS1258-207 01/17/24 641-163-23 Rim Rock Road Extension Conceptual Review 1 01/29/24 01/30/24 Temple Hills Land Dwy Extension X 2.00 1258-190 12/05/23 641-373-20 TPM 648 Canyon View Dr. Lot split 3 12/12/23 12/12/23 NOT SB-9 X 1.00 TOAL C. Dominguez 1258-184 10/25/23 641-061-15 LLA 3002 Dorn Court Lot Line Adjustment 3 11/01/23 10/31/23 LLA 22-1492 X 3.00 MS PETRIE A. Beck1258-172 10/19/23 658-019-06 PM 31532 Coast Hwy PM 2023-172 3 11/01/23 11/02/23 Lot split for an empty lot 1.50 L. SANDBERG K. Kazama1258-164 10/13/23 644-341-47 SB9 1194 Morningside Dr Lot split 2 10/25/23 10/25/23 60:40 Lot Split - 1 lot into 2 X 2.00 FUSCOE K. Kazama1258-206 10/03/23 644-142-11 SB9 1385 Terrace Way Existing SFR lot split -no dev't 1 10/16/23 10/17/23 PM 2023-145 5.00 K. Kazama 1258-162-1 10/04/23 644-321-27 PM 1526 Morningside Drive Map for SB9 3 10/11/23 10/10/23 PC3 of PM 2021-184 X 1.00 A. Viera 1258-201 10/02/23 H+H 2400 Juanita Way Road extension 1 10/09/23 10/04/23 To create a lot to develop a SFD X 0.00 A. Viera1258-184 09/26/23 641-061-15 LLA 3002 Dorn Court Lot Line Adjustment 2 10/03/23 10/04/23 LLA 22-1492 X 3.00 A. Beck1258-191 09/26/23 644-472-17 SB9 1028 Tia Juana SB9 Lot Split 3 10/03/23 10/02/23 X 1.00 G. Wink1258-205 09/20/23 LLA 675 Buena Vista Way Lot Line Adjustment 1 10/03/23 10/05/23 LLA 23-1747 X 3.001258-190 09/26/23 641-373-20 TPM 648 Canyon View Dr. Lot split 2 10/02/23 10/02/23 NOT SB-9 X 1.00 C. Dominguez1258-192 09/11/23 2022-2028 667 Sleepy Hollow Ln Reef Wing Remodel 3 09/18/23 09/25/23 3.50 Maria Ring1258-203 09/08/23 COC Temple Hills COC 3 09/15/23 09/14/23 (Frank) X 1.50 9 1258-191 08/16/23 644-472-17 SB9 1028 Tia Juana SB9 Lot Split 2 08/23/23 08/24/23 X 1.00 G. Wink1258-162-1 08/15/23 644-321-27 PM 1526 Morningside Drive Map for SB9 2 08/22/23 08/28/23 PC2 of PM 2021-184 X 1.00 A. Viera 1258-203 08/09/23 COC Temple Hills COC 2 08/22/23 08/22/23 X 1.501258-187 08/16/23 644-304-04 P 705 Gainsborough Street Improvement 3 08/21/23 08/22/23 X 0.50 G. Wink1258-204 08/15/23 505 Center Street 1 08/21/23 08/21/23 1.001258-181 08/01/23 644-184-11 SB9 1177 Temple Hills Drive SB9 Lot Split 3 08/14/23 08/14/23 1.50 A. Beck1258-136 08/02/23 530 Ruby Street Major Res Remodel 8 08/08/23 08/14/23 PC2 for DMc X 1.00 D. Latham1258-201 08/01/23 H+H 2400 Juanita Way Road extension - 1st DMc PC 3 08/08/23 08/14/23 To create a lot to develop a SFD X 1.50 A. Viera1258-162-2 08/01/23 644-321-27 TTM 1526 Morningside Drive New Residence 1 08/07/23 08/07/23 Lot Split X 2.00 A. Viera1258-173 07/25/23 644-291-96 SB9 2108 Crestview SB9 Lot Split 3 07/31/23 07/31/23 Lot split for an existing home 1.00 A. Beck 1258-203 07/20/23 COC Temple Hills Cert of Compliance 1 08/03/23 08/03/23 Fr. Frank 2.001258-199 07/12/23 CBP2022-2022 668 Sleepy Hollow Seas Bldg-Pac Edge Hotel 1 07/20/23 07/20/23 0.25 Maria Ring 1258-200 07/12/23 CBP2022-2024 636 Sleepy Hollow Bahia Bldg-Pac Edge Hotel 1 07/20/23 07/20/23 0.25 Maria Ring1258-198 07/12/23 CBP2022-2021 627 Sleepy Hollow Villa Bldg.-Pac Edge Hotel 1 07/20/23 07/20/23 0.25 Maria Ring 1258-197 07/12/23 CBP2022-2027 619 Sleepy Hollow Driftwood Bldg-Pac Edge 1 07/20/23 07/20/23 0.25 Maria Ring1258-194 06/28/23 2022-2020 647 S. Coast Hwy Coast Bldg Remodel 2 07/11/23 07/13/23 0.50 Maria Ring 1258-180-2 06/28/23 2022-2031 610+620 Sleepy Hollow Ln Pacific Edge Hotel-Overall 2 07/11/23 07/11/23 Hardscape - Com'l Bldg 0.50 Maria Ring 1258-172 06/27/23 658-019-06 SB9 31532 Coast Hwy SB9 Lot Split 2 07/11/23 07/12/23 Lot split for an empty lot 1.50 K. Kazama1258-196 06/22/23 SB9 1378 Terrace Way Lot Split 1 06/27/23 06/28/23 1.001258-187 06/22/23 644-304-04 P 705 Gainsborough Street Improvement 2 06/27/23 07/06/23 PW 1.00 PAGE 2 OF 3
e
SAaye Drive
AMajor Res Remode Road extension Road extens New Resid w Resid SB9 Lo
Ce
SARes
SB9 Lot SplitStreet Improvement
Lot Split
SAMel plit r SB9
C
AMP S 2
MPL2
312
3 3
2 LP M SA
PLE3 6/23 10/11/23 10/09/23 10/03/23 10/0 10/03/23 0/03/23 10/03/23 10/03/23 10/02/23 09/18/2 09/1 EL P 31/2 11/02/23 11/02 10/25/
LE23 10/25/23 10/17/23 10/17/23 10/10/23 10/10 10/04/23 10/04/23E10/02/2 10/02/ 10/LE P 60:4 PM 202 PC3 of To c E
350
PLE SAM PLE SAM PLE SAM
DMc 2ND CHECK
SA
P
ADD TO TITLE FOR URBAN LOT SPLIT PURPOSES
ZPC-23-1850 ADD CITY PROJ. NO.
LABEL TRASH ENCLOSURE
ZONING : R1 FIRE: VHFHSZ WATERSHED: LCS DRAINAGE FEE - YES SEWER SERVICE - YES SEWER MAIN IS 6"
NO PARKING IS PERMITTED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE STREET NOTE: TERRACE WAY IS A ONE-WAY STREET
PARKING FOR PARCEL 2 WILL HAVE TO COME OFF OF CERRITOS DRIVE CALLOUT EX. WM, INCLUDING METER SIZE AND ADD NOTE TO PROTECT IN PLACE *PLEASE SHOW BOTH EXISTING AND PROPOSED SETBACKS.
REMOVE THIS SENTENCE
URBAN LOT SPLIT NOTE: THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS SET FORTH IN GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65411.7 AND 66452.6. UPON RECORDATION OF THIS MAP, NO FURTHER USE OF SECTION 66411.7 SHALL BE PERMITTED ON THE PARCELS CREATED BY THIS MAP.
ADD THIS NOTE
351
PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE (CMO)
PLAN CHECK NUMBER 00705622-GPLM
DESCRIPTION WLC Mass Grade and Storm Drain Plan
PLAN CHECK 3
REVIEWED BY DJM, DMc; C. Koster
(Items 1+ 3-7 below are 3rd request comments)
1. Provide a construction schedule for the phases discussed. Provide information about the tenants on City property to the City Manager.
2. Prior to any demolition of Perimeter Road, an alternate access road or the proposed road along the easterly border of District 5 shall be in place.
3. Move the fence to match the Dept. of Navy’s LIFOC limits.
4. Before storm drain lines can be removed, provide supporting H & H calcs to support interim and ultimate conditions and the phasing you indicated in the pre-resubmittal meeting.
5. Provide comments, if any from other impacted/vested regulatory agencies (County, CA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife, Wild Resources, SWRCB, local vested wild corridor advocates).
6. Address differences in these plans and the Wildlife Corridor Design report. For example, STA 20+69 has a pinch point that is not on the WLC plan.
7. Provide a listing of entities impacted by the utility removals and provide their concurrence or proof of no impact.
8. The first segment of the WLC had interim improvements northerly of Irvine Boulevard that must be mitigated/removed in support of the plan.
9. Rename plan set to include reference to Segment 2.
(Items 10-22 below are 2nd request comments)
10. Provide all required hydrological and hydraulic analysis for the corridor. They shall be in compliance with the United State Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the Department of Fish and Games, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the approved Alton Parkway Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP), as stipulated in the approved Irvine Wildlife Corridor Plan dated June 14, 2014.
11. All required hydrological and hydraulic analysis shall be for 10-year 24-hour and 100-year 24-hour frequency storms respectively, and shall be consistent with the Update to the Amendment to the PA 51 and PA 30 Watershed Flood Control Master Plan.
12. Show and label the limits of the approved Alton Parkway HMMP.
13. Show and label the proposed location of the re-configured low-flow diversion structure from Segment 1 per the above WLC plan.
t to inMPLEWL
suppor EL
to inc M
re 2nd
LC hOFCITY LC
cted by
OF
he Wild he W
plan
IRVINEthe p
ested r ested
sted w
PLAN
porting
re
CHECK or the p EC
352
I:\PROPOSALS\5815 City of San Clemente_On-Call (as-needed) Engineering Plan Check Services\PROPOSAL\7.1. SAMPLES\00705622-GPLM_WLC MG+SD_PC3.docx
14. Show and label Magazine Road.
15. Provide previously-prepared or current hydrological and hydraulic calculations to substantiate that the re-configure structure would have the capacity to convey “approximately 53 to 96 cfs in 10-year storm events and up to 112 cfs during a 100-year storm event” as stipulated in the approved Irvine Wildlife Corridor Plan dated June 13, 2013. The geometry of the low-flow structure shall be such as to adequately convey the flow rates stipulated above during the mass grading phase, i.e. without stabilization or armoring. Provide documentation to support this.
16. Include adequate provisions in the design of the low-flow structure that would provide the flexibility to allow the option of adjacent properties to discharge treated storm water to Segment 2, and onward to Segments 3 and 4.
17. Provide hydrological and hydraulic calculations to substantiate that the underpass at Astor Road would have the capacity to convey “approximately 53 to 96 cfs in 10-year storm events and up to 112 cfs during a 100-year storm event” with a minimum of 1.00-foot freeboard for the 100-year flowthrough. And if ponding was to result from such an event, please provide cross-sections to show the extents of such ponding.
18. Provide Landscape and Irrigation plans to show consistency with WLC plan
19. The swale along the easterly edge is lengthy and could have significant erosive flow; please address.
20. Provide hydrological and hydraulic calculations to substantiate that the underdrains at the flowcontrol berm (drop-down) locations have the capacity to convey up-stream as well as diverted flows from 10-year storm events and from 100-year storm events. And if ponding was to result from such an event, please provide cross-sections to show the extents of such ponding (especially regarding maintenance access road, where applicable).
21. The grades of the underpass structure should depict any over-excavations to allow for a minimum of 8’ wide flow path as specified in the approved Irvine Wildlife Corridor Plan that would remain hardened to adequately convey storm water flows, resist erosion, and at the same time convey a natural flow.
SD Plan
22. Please refer to Figure 5 of the approved Irvine Wildlife Corridor Plan dated June 14, 2014, for the stipulated typical section of the WLC, and provide an explanation for any variation from the typical section (including perhaps a weighted-average of the typical approximate width of 600 feet).
23. Show and label the low-flow swale in all sections.
24. Sheets 9 + 10: No removals or improvements should occur in LIFOC area until PERF is approved; address this on the plan set. Will the Navy allow work in the area? I know they are still testing the area for a new contaminant.
25. Sheet 11: If the existing 30” RCP under Magazine Road is removed, how will drainage from Phase 1 be handled until the new storm drain is constructed?
SAMPLE
to Figu
cal
OF
fied i
onvey
CITYplicab
ucture
n
OF
year
s to sho
ble
IRVINE s to su
capacit capaci
sto
PLANwith W
ave sig
CHECKs
board f
ide cros de cro
WL
353
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
ON-CALL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK SERVICES
VIII. DMc ENGINEERING - PROJECT SCHEDULE / COST DATA
Page | 33
VIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE
DMc Engineering’s goal is to ensure that all plan reviews are returned ahead of the city published schedule. DMc has personnel that reside in San Clemente who can promptly pick up and return submittals. We can also upload the plan check information into the city’s database tracking sheet and confirm that the package is complete and has all the necessary support and reference documents. In the following few days, the plan review begins. DMc’s primary objective is to provide a thorough and comprehensive first review that will provide for a smooth plan review and approval process.
DMc works toward an early review to allow agencies additional days to perform internal processing so the plans are returned to the applicant on the city-published schedule. The above schedule applies to the subsequent resubmittal, but has a quicker turnaround based on the applicant response to the plan review.
IX. COST DATA
See separate submittal for plan check hourly rates.
354
X. DMc ENGINEERING - COMPLIANCE AND OTHER INFORMATION Page | 34
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
ON-CALL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK SERVICES
X. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
Derek J. McGregor, Inc. dba: DMc Engineering was founded and incorporated in 1987 by Derek J. McGregor, who serves in the capacity of president and is the company’s authorized person to bind the firm contractually.
Firm Legal Name: Derek J. McGregor, Inc., dba: DMc Engineering State of Incorporation: California
Address: 18 Technology Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618-2309
Contact: Derek J. McGregor, PE, PLS, QSD, QSP
949.753.9393
[email protected]
This proposal is in strict compliance with the Request for Proposal and Draft Agreement and no exceptions to either are proposed.
XI. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT
DMc Engineering agrees that in carrying out our responsibilities under this agreement, and in particular with regard to the employment of persons and sub-contractors working on the project, we will not discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, religion, sex, age, or handicap. 355
18 Technology Drive, Suite 100 | Irvine, CA 92618
Telephone: (949) 753-9393
DMc ENGINEERING
CIVIL ŀ SURVEYING ŀ PLANNING ŀ CONSTRUCTION
Hourly Rate Schedule
(As of January 1, 2025)
OFFICE PERSONNEL Cost/Hour
Principal (PR)………………………………………………………………..…..… $ 260.00
Project Manager (PM) ……………………………………….….……………….. $ 220.00 Construction Manager (CM) ……………..…………….…….….………………. $ 220.00 Project Engineer (PE) ………………………………..……….………………….. $ 200.00 Project Surveyor (PS) ……………………………………………..…..…………. $ 200.00 Senior Engineer (SE) ……...…………………………………………….……….. $ 180.00 Associate Engineer (AE) …………………………..……………….……………. $ 160.00 Administration (ADMIN) .………………………….……….…………………….. $ 100.00 FIELD SURVEY Cost/Hour
Field Survey (FS) ………………………….……………….…………………….. $ 230.00 GPS Survey (GPS) ……………………….………………….……….………….. $ 250.00
NOTE: Reproductions, computer plotting, copying, messenger services and other direct expenses will be billed per our reimbursement fee schedule. No additional charges for mileage, supplies or telephone expenses will be included. 356
CHO DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. 3601 W. MacArthur Blvd., #903, Santa Ana, CA 92704 CDA file No. feesched.doc
FEE SCHEDULE
Effective January 1, 2025
Principal Engineer/Project Manager ................................................................ $ 235.00/Hr Project/Senior Engineer .................................................................................. $ 215.00/Hr CADD Technician/Draftsperson ...................................................................... $ 175.00/Hr Word Processing/Clerical .................................................................................. $ 90.00/Hr Reproductions, deliveries and other reimbursable items will be billed at our cost plus 15%. 357
Submitted By
West Coast Civil
550 Seagaze Drive, Suite L101
Oceanside, CA 92054
Austin Frisby
E: [email protected]
P: 858-869-1332
www.westcoastcivil.com
Dedicated to Growing
Communities
PROPOSAL FOR ON-CALL
(AS-NEEDED) ENGINEERING
PLAN CHECK SERVICES
JANUARY 21, 2025
Submitted To
Zak Ponsen, P.E. Assistant City Engineer
City of San Clemente
910 Calle Negocio, Suite 100
San Clemente, CA 92673
Attachment 7
358
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 2 SECTION 1 - COVER LETTER..............................................................................................3 SECTION 2 - BACKGROUND AND APPROACH..............................................................5 SECTION 3 - METHODOLOGY(IES)......................................................................................7 SECTION 4 - WORK PLAN...................................................................................................9 SECTION 5 - PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING........................................16 SECTION 6 - RELATED EXPERIENCE.............................................................................21 SECTION 7 - SAMPLE PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LISTS AND FORMS.........26 SECTION 8 - PROJECT SCHEDULE................................................................................47 SECTION 9 - COST DATA..................................................................................................49 SECTION 10 - STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE............................................................52 SECTION 11 - OTHER INFORMATION............................................................................54 SECTION 12 - GENERAL PROVISIONS STATEMENT..............................................56
TABLE OF CONTENTS
359
SECTION 1:
COVER LETTER
360
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 4 January 21, 2025
Zak Ponsen, P.E. Assistant City Engineer
City of San Clemente
910 Calle Negocio, Suite 100
San Clemente, CA 92673
Subject: On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services The City of San Clemente is seeking assistance in managing and performing Engineering Department’s plan checks. Many coastal cities face similar workload challenges are driven by the desire to live and work in coastal communities. West Coast Civil (WCC) understands the need for plan check support services for coastal cities, having supported the Cities of Dana Point, Solana Beach, and Coronado for the past decade.
WCC is committed to GROWING COMMUNITIES by assisting its clients in developing sustainable, costeffective, long-term infrastructure that benefit the local area and its residents. WCC has prepared this strategic proposal and qualifications for the City’s On-Call Project. The objective of this proposal is to demonstrate our capability to perform high-quality plan check services efficiently and comprehensively.
The benefits the WCC team will provide to the City are:
• Established track record delivering as-needed services for coastal communities • A highly qualified team familiar with development
• South Orange County experience
• A local firm
Our president, Anthony Gonzalez, will serve as the principal signer and is authorized to sign such material and to commit WCC to the obligations contained within this proposal. The price presented in this proposal is valid for a period of ninety (90) days from the reflected date of this letter.
We are excited about the opportunity to assist the City of San Clemente. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Austin Frisby, PE, QSD
Project Manager
(858) 869-1332
[email protected]
West Coast Civil | 550 Seagaze Drive, Suite L101 | Oceanside, CA 92054 Anthony Gonzalez, PE, ENV-SP
President
(858) 869-1332
[email protected]
361
SECTION 2:
BACKGROUND AND
APPROACH
362
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 6
BACKGROUND & APPROACH
This as-needed contract will be critical in assisting the City in maintaining a high level of service for its citizens across its multiple functions. Our approach to the as-needed work includes dedicating Austin Frisby as the Project Manager and key technical resource for the engineering plan check services. He is local and has been providing similar services to the City of Dana Point. WCC is providing three additional plan checkers to assist Austin during the plan check process to allow greater flexibility and resources. This core team will provide the horsepower needed to complete all tasks assigned to them. In addition, high-level technical resources will always be available when needed.
WCC understands the human resource challenges that the City is facing.
APPROACH TO THE WORK
The City of San Clemente is a coastal city that, although nearly built-out, undergoes constant development through vacant land improvements, partial or complete teardowns, and tenant improvements. Beyond development, the City is taking part in parking lot reconstruction and landslide repairs due to its topography. The City has a third-party consultant that performs review of soils reports, but relies on a separate consultant to ensure the review comments are incorporated into the overall plan check. The City needs a resource to provide on-call engineering plan check services for the Public Works Department. This work includes reviewing plans for correctness and conformance to local ordinances, reviewing design calculations and technical specifications, and developing correction lists for applicable permit submittals. This work will extend to a variety of conditions, including, but not limited to: single-family residential, multifamily residential, commercial, industrial, public, and slope repair. Work may include grading, utilities, street improvements, water quality management, drainage, erosion and sediment control plans, retaining walls, and shoring.
WCC will be a valuable resource for your engineering plan check needs.
BACKGROUND
363
SECTION 3:
METHODOLOGY(IES)
364
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 8
METHODOLOGY(IES)
WCC’s methodology for providing
complete, concise, and clear plan
checks involves a systematic,
step-by-step approach to review
and evaluate engineering plans submitted for
compliance with the respective ordinances, codes,
regulations, and standard engineering practice(s).
We strive to provide complete reviews in a timely
manner that promote development within the City.
This is accomplished through a multi-step program
as documented below. WCC is also providing a
secondary Professional Engineer (PE) to be available
in the event Austin Frisby is out of the office.
WCC aims to deliver prompt and thorough
reviews that foster growth within the City.
OUR PLAN CHECK APPROACH
1. Document submittal and Initial Review for
Completeness
2. Review for Local, State, and Federal Conformance
3. In-Depth Plan Check and Evaluation
4. Cross-Party Coordination
5. Development of Corrections Letter
6. Final Review and Approval
7. Return of Corrections
Goal: This process provides a rigorous framework for
providing reviews of engineering plans, starting from
the initial submission to final approval. Our goal is to ensure compliance with all relevant codes, regulations, and safety standards. Through effective communication
between WCC and the City, this process minimizes risks
and maximizes efficiency. The step-by-step process is
discussed more in detail below.
1. Document Submittal and Initial Review for Completeness: Confirm the submitted plans are complete, legible, and meet the City requirements for review of the respective permit(s). Ensure all the necessary forms and supplemental document(s) are included with the submittal package.
2. Review for Local, State, and Federal Conformance: Ensure the design complies with Local (City of San Clemente), State, and Federal regulations, including, but not limited to building codes, zoning ordinances, and environmental agency(ies).
3. In-Depth Plan Check and Evaluation: Complete a detailed review of the submitted plans to ensure there are no inconsistencies or technical errors within the plans, specifications, or supplemental supporting document(s).
4. Cross-Party Coordination: Confirm the submitted plans are consistent with other disciplines or subsequent permit(s) (ie grading and shoring plans). Identify any conflicts and ensure the design disciplines do not contradict one another.
5. Development of Corrections Letter: Develop redlines and a corresponding corrections letter to summarize any issues/deficiencies that require addressing prior to permit authorization. Work efforts will include a redlined (physical or electronic) plan set and accompanying letter on City/ WCC letterhead to be formally responded to with the Applicant’s subsequent resubmittal.
6. Final Review and Approval: Complete a final evaluation of all items to ensure compliance with Steps 1 through 5.
7. Return of Corrections: Return corrections or approval(s) and follow the Standard Operating Procedure associated with the City.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Step-by-step
Approach
365
SECTION 4:
WORK PLAN
366
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 10 WCC understands the importance of this contract and
has developed a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
based on our current experience with the City of Dana
Point. This SOP will be a living document and can be
modified to fit the needs of the City.
WORK PLAN
WCC currently provides engineering plan
check services and staff augmentation
for the City of Dana Point’s Public Works
Engineering Department. With this contract,
WCC has three individuals who work from
the City of Dana Point. As part of this contract, Austin Frisby or Skye Benson would coordinate with the City of San Clemente to receive hard copy submittals from City
Hall during their City of Dana Point staff augmentation days. Redlines would be returned to the city on or before the appropriate due dates. As discussed in the Standard Operating Procedure, WCC maintains a working log of plan checks and their current status to serve as a chain of custody during reviews. WCC intends to provide a majority of the plan checks remotely, but is available to provide in-house services or attend site visits/meetings at the City’s request.
This work plan’s intent is to enhance City
engineering capabilities to deliver as-needed
services for the City.
KEY DELIVERABLES
367
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 11 San Clemente | Public Works As-Needed Plan Check Page | 1
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (FOR CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE) PROJECT: CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE – PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PW-ENG) SCOPE OF WORK: PLAN CHECKS
DATE: TBD
I. SCOPE OF WORK
This Project provides plan check services for the City’s Public Works Group as part of the Public Works-Engineering Department. All work is reimbursable for the City so billing is very particular and requires the permit number, site address, and review type/number (see below).
Job Rate Hours Description
SAN CLEMENTE Public
Works As-Needed
Civil Engineer 3 BLD22-1238 3 Shoreline (Pool-2nd)
Most reviews will be available electronically, but the Applicant typically submits hard copies as well. As the plan checker, you will be required to review any plans, calculations, reports, etc. that are tied to the permit under review. Other Departments/Disciplines will be performing concurrent reviews so be aware of the review you are assigned (typically ‘Engineering’). Following the review of the plans and developing ‘redline’ comments, you will be required to develop a Memo to summarize the comments that are being returned to the Applicant (see example).
II. TYPES OF REVIEWS FOR THE CITY
PA – Discretionary Review. Examples include all projects that need a preliminary review prior to assignment of different permits. Goal is to determine the feasibility of the project and identify potential hurdles that may arise from a Project. Typically includes new SFR’s, Mixed Use Projects, and Large-Scale Walls:
• PA Reviews (PW-ENG Perspective). PA reviews from the PW-ENG perspective review the feasibility of a project and identify the required permits and submittals associated with the Project. Once the Project is deemed feasible, ‘Conditions of Approval’ are drafted for the project and set before Planning Commission for a Project. The Planning Department typically oversees this process and compiles all of the comments/conditions. These conditions are then tied to the Project through construction stages.
• Checklist. The City does not have a specific checklist to utilize for these reviews as permits have not been assigned at this point. This is a general over-arching review that assigns types of permits.
368
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 12 San Clemente | Public Works As-Needed Plan Check Page | 2
BLD – Building Department Driven Permits. Examples include:
Retaining Walls ADU’s Pool/Spa
Shoring Tenant Improvements Remodels
Architectural Drawings
• BLD Reviews (PW-ENG Perspective). BLD reviews from the PW-ENG perspective primarily look at the components that are in contact with the soil (ie foundation plan, walls, excavation, over-excavation, temporary excavation) and ensure that the structural plans are in concert with the Arch and civil (if provided) plans. Other considerations on BLD permits include roof downspout locations, property line limits, and California Building Code cycle conformance.
Note that if any walls are called out on the plans where the wall height, from top of footing to top of wall, exceeds 36”, a separate permit will be required with structural calculations. • CBC and ASCE Conformance. Contingent upon the permit year, a different CBC cycle will apply to the Project. A BLD22-xxxx would need to conform to 2019 CBC where a BLD23-xxxx would be required to conform to the 2022 CBC. For seismic parameters, the Project should conform to ASCE 7-16 requirements. If no Soils Report is provided, the soil site class shall be “DDefault” with the corresponding parameters. • Soils Report. The City has a handout titled BO-13 that determines when a Soils Report is required and provides minimum values to use in the event a Soils Report is not needed or desired. Typically, Projects with a footprint of less than 800 SF can utilize the BO-13 for presumptive load values. In the absence of a Soils Report, for all calculations, the Project shall defer to the most conservative presumptive load values from Table 1610.1 (SC/CL soil class) and Table 1806.2 (Type V soil class) of the CBC.
• Checklist. The City typically uses the ‘PW-Arch Strct Review Checklist’ for BLD related reviews.
ENG – Public Works Engineering Driven Permits. Examples include:
Grading & Drainage Hydrology & Hydraulics Storm Drain Pump Station Utility Design WQMP Encroachment Permit
• ENG Reviews (PW-ENG Perspective). ENG reviews from the PW-ENG perspective primarily look at the feasibility of the site grading and layout of the site drainage to be to the street. • Soils Report. ENG reviews typically have a Soils Report to be reviewed. From the PW-ENG perspective, this review will look to verify components of the grading and drainage (ie flatwork, temporary excavations, over-excavation limits, retaining wall design, etc.) • Checklist. The City typically uses either the ‘447_020a_Grading Checklist_non-geo’ or ‘447_020_Grading Checklist_Technical Review’ checklists for ENG reviews. 369
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 13 San Clemente | Public Works As-Needed Plan Check Page | 3
LND – Landscaping Driven Permits.
• LND Reviews (PW-ENG Perspective). LND reviews from the PW-ENG perspective primarily look at the landscaping plan to ensure that it matches the civil plans/base and is stamped by a Soils Engineer, if a report has been prepared.
III. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS
Provided below are a few considerations depending on the type of review that is performed. • Title Sheets
o Vicinity Map / Scope of Work / Project Contact Directory / Sheet Index / CBC Conformance Cycle / Stamps and Signatures
• Caissons/Shoring (BLD)
o Scope of work provided on Title Sheet (# piles, pool square footage, depth) o Maximum allowable deflection is 0.5in
o 2’ minimum offset from subdrain (OD to OD)
Check AMEC rough grading if within Headlands for subdrains o Piles labeled individually with corresponding table
o Any Geogrid Penetration should provide a note to utilize sharp cutting head o Elevation of Geogrid labeled and location of geogrid limits shown for Strand homes o Embedment into competent soils per Soils Report
• Landscape Plans (LND)
o Identify items under separate permit
o Add note to plans: “All drainage shall be in accordance with the 20XX California Building Code and City of SAN CLEMENTE Municipal Code.” OR per ENG permit, if available o If Geotech involved, provide contact info and have them stamp/sign plans o Provide civil plans “For Reference Only”
• Building Plans
o Current Building Code called out and soil parameters provided o Soils Report (If not, use BO13 handout)
o Footing embedment, reinforcement, and dimensions match Soils Report or BO-13 o Provide civil plans “For Reference Only”
o Identify Downspout locations match civil plans
• Pool Plans
o Site/Lot Drainage shown
Add S14 Infiltration Box, if reasonable
o Calcs and plans utilize Equivalent Fluid Pressure of 100 if no Soils Report o Provide FS elevations for pool/spa coping (matches civil plans, if available) o “All Pool equipment shall drain to sanitary sewer or landscape area.” 370
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 14 San Clemente | Public Works As-Needed Plan Check Page | 4
o “All drainage shall be in accordance with the 20XX California Building Code and City of SAN CLEMENTE Municipal Code.”
If applicable, all grading and drainage per Civil Plans (ENGxx-xxxx) o Geotech Stamp/Signature, if Soils Report provided
• Retaining Wall Plans (BLD)
o Title Sheet
o Wall Schedule (Type / Height / Length / Detail Reference) o Show extents of footings on plan view
o On Details, show Property Lines, where necessary (walls on the PL will require a Common Wall Agreement, CWA)
o Provide civil plans labeled “For Reference Only”
o Add Notes that all G&D shall be per ENG permit OR see note from LND considerations o Note that all drainage (subdrains) shall be handled as part of G&D permit (ENG) IV. REVIEW RESPONSES
Following the review of a permit submittal, there are (4) options to be returned to the Applicant:
1. Incomplete – The package is missing information that does not allow for a complete review.
2. Corrections – The package has redlines that require the Applicant to review and update the package. All resubmittals should have a response to comments from the previous review.
3. Approved Pending – The package has minor corrections (slip sheet a page or Soils Stamp) that can be handled by the Permit Tech over the counter assuming the plan check review has explicit conditions to approve.
4. Approved – The package has addressed all requirements and is approved by PW-ENG.
Prior to returning comments to the City, please coordinate with the Project Manager to determine if a meeting with the City is needed to discuss comments/concerns on the Project. To return comments, please send a Sharefile link to the PM and Applicant so the review can be ‘checked out’ and uploaded to the City’s server.
V. FILE MANAGEMENT
Due to the back and forth with the City and WCC server, it is critical that files be kept in a single location during the review process and retained on the server when adding to the City’s server. Each review should be organized by the permit number (ie BLD22-1013 35356 Del Rey). From there, a new folder is created for each review (1st, 2nd, etc.). All electronic files are archived under a “Rcvd” folder within that review. Please name files as shown below to create uniformity in the reviews and for file explorer searches:
Redlined (Electronic) Plans:
“BLD2X-XXXX_1st ENG PC-Site Address_WCC”
Return Memorandum:
“BLD2X-XXXX_1st ENG PC Ltr-Site Address”
371
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 15 San Clemente | Public Works As-Needed Plan Check Page | 5
A master tracking log of all permits received and returned is on the OneDrive server. This file holds the permit number, review number, type of review, plan checker, received date, returned date, and current status. This helps identify which permits are outstanding or who the plan checker is. 372
SECTION 5:
PROJECT
ORGANIZATION
AND STAFFING
373
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 17 WCC has a team of resources, a highly
qualified staff, and availability to meet the
City’s needs.
West Coast Civil (WCC) is comprised of
tenured engineers who are dedicated
to growing a local engineering firm by
servicing local clients. The WCC team
has previous experience with these type of contracts
and provides the economic benefits of a local firm.
The WCC team will efficiently deliver the City’s
as-needed engineering plan checks. This section
presents our team’s organizational structure and
WCC assembled a diverse and talented qualifications of key staff. team with a broad depth of knowledge
and experience with as-needed contracts
for local municipalities.
SPECIALIZED EXPERTISE
PROJECT TEAM | STAFF EXPERIENCE
Team Benefits
• Experience Managing As-Needed Contracts
• Local Team with Extensive Local Experience
• Establish a Working Relationship
374
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 18 Project Manager/Lead Reviewer
West Coast Civil
Austin Frisby, PE, QSD
City of San Clemente
Michel Ortiz, EIT
Skye Benson, EIT
Carlos Gil-Marroquin, EIT
Additional Plan Checkers
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Principal in Charge/QA/QC
West Coast Civil
Anthony Gonzalez, PE, ENV-SP
KEY STAFF AVAILABILITY
Name and Role Percent Availability
Anthony Gonzalez, PE, ENV SP, Principal in Charge / QA/QC 10-25% Austin Frisby, PE, QSD, Project Manager/Lead Reviewer 50-75% Skye Benson, EIT, Plan Checker 25-50%
Michel Ortiz, EIT, Plan Checker 25-50%
Carlos Gil-Marroquin, EIT, Plan Checker 10-25%
Claire Pfeifer, PE, PE Support 10-25%
PE Support
West Coast Civil
Claire Pfeifer, PE
Primary Point of Contact
375
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 19
AUSTIN FRISBY, PE, QSD
PROJECT MANAGER / LEAD REVIEWER
Austin is a project manager with nine years of municipal civil engineering experience. He provides project management and engineering services for local municipal as-needed contracts.
He started his career with the City of La Mesa and understands the needs of local cities. He will serve as the project manager for the City’s On-Call Contract and be your main point of contact.
EXPERIENCE THAT COUNTS
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, San Diego
State University, 2017
REGISTRATIONS
Registered Civil Engineer, State of
California, RCE 92311
Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD)
BACKGROUND
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (COASTAL)
Like many coastal communities, the City of San Clemente is flush with permit applications. Whether it is a new single-family home that requires discretional and building permits, or an addition to an existing residence, Austin has seen it all in his role at Dana Point. He is the ideal candidate to assist San Clemente with the engineering development reviews. Austin has served as the project manager for WCC’s as-needed plan check contract with the city of Solana Beach. He is well versed in managing contracts while overseeing other plan checkers where workload permits. Over the course of the contract, WCC has provided review of over 25 permits for the City of Solana Beach and assisted with several other needs including grant assistance, encroachment permits, and site design.
LOCAL
The City will utilize this contract to perform as-needed engineering, review services to supplement its existing Engineering Department Staff. Austin is performing this exact role for the City of Dana Point in a part-time capacity. To date, Austin has performed over 750 permit reviews for the City fo Dana Point’s Development Services Department. He understands what the City needs and will integrate our team with yours.
Austin is excited about the opportunity to expand WCC’s presence in South Orange County coastal areas. His goal is to grow WCC’s Oceanside office by servicing more clients in North San Diego County and South Orange County. The City of San Clemente is equidistant from WCC’s headquarters in Scripps Ranch and the Oceanside office.
You want Austin as your project manager for this contract. He is organized and thoughtful with his communications. He understands what the city needs for completeness and turnaround times, what the applicant needs to reach approval, and what the public wants with safe, legal developments.
PROACTIVE COMMUNICATION
ANTHONY GONZALEZ, PE, ENV SP
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE / QA/QC
EDUCATION
BS, Mechanical Engineering, San
Diego State University
REGISTRATIONS
• Professional Engineer, CA C80417
• Envision Sustainability Professional
(ENV SP)
Anthony founded WCC in 2013 to grow a local San Diego-based engineering firm.
He believes in investing in local communities and providing client-focused service.
Anthony has over 20 years of civil engineering experience in municipal public works engineering. He will serve as the Principal-in-Charge and ensure that the right allocated resources are provided to the City.
BACKGROUND
EXPERIENCE
• City of Dana Point As-Needed Development Services Support • San Diego Gas and Electric Fire Risk Management Program As-Needed • City of La Mesa On-Call Engineering
• City of Solana Beach As-Needed Engineering Support
376
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 20
MICHEL ORTIZ, EIT
DESIGN ENGINEER
SKYE BENSON, EIT
DESIGN ENGINEER
Skye will assist with development reviews on an as-needed basis. She currently performs plan check services for the City of Dana Point. • City of Dana Point As-Needed
• City of San Diego Development Review On-Call
ROLE
Michel will serve as a design engineer and will assist with development reviews.
He currently performs plan check services for the City of Solana Beach and City of Coronado. He is experienced with site design and development reviews. • City of San Diego Development Review On-Call
• City of Solana Beach On-Call
• City of Coronado On-Call
EXPERIENCE
CLAIRE PFEIFER, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
Claire will serve as Austin’s professional engineer support in the event he is unavailable or on PTO. Claire is a licensed engineer in the state of California and has performed plan check services for the City of Dana Point and UC San Diego. • City of Dana Point On-Call
• UC San Diego As-Needed
ROLE
EXPERIENCE
CARLOS GIL-MARROQUIN, EIT
DESIGN ENGINEER
ROLE
Carlos will serve as a design engineer and will assist with development reviews and capital improvement plan designs as needed. He has been providing this service to the City of Coronado for the past year.
• City of San Diego Development Review On-Call
• City of Coronado On-Call
EXPERIENCE
ROLE
EXPERIENCE
377
SECTION 6:
RELATED
EXPERIENCE
378
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 22 WCC On-Call Engineering Plan Check Prime Contracts
City of Dana Point On-Call Engineering
City of Solana Beach On-Call Engineering
City of La Mesa On-Call Engineering
City of Coronado On-Call Engineering
City of Oceanside On-Call Engineering
University of California San Diego On-Call Engineering
Additional As-Needed Experience
Cal-Water On-Call Master Engineering Services
City of San Diego Comprehensive Groundwater Services As-Needed City of San Diego Planning Department Environmental As-Needed City of San Diego Public Utilities Department Civil Engineering As-Needed City of San Diego Public Utilities Department Environmental As-Needed City of San Diego Public Works Department Civil Engineering As-Needed City of San Diego Public Works Department Utility Undergrounding As-Needed City of San Diego Transportation and Stormwater Department As-Needed City of San Diego Pure Water Program
County of San Diego On-Call Engineering
Hi-Desert Water District Capital Replacement Program
Joshua Basin Water District Capital Replacement Program Naval Facilities Command South West Wet Utility Multiple Award Construction Contract San Diego International Airport Airside and Landside Engineering As-Needed San Diego Gas & Electric As-Needed
Experience and Past Performance
379
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 23
CITY OF DANA POINT ON-CALL ENGINEERING
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
WCC provides engineering plan check
services for the City of Dana Point both
in-house and remotely. To date, WCC has
reviewed over 1,000 permit submittals
associated with the Building, Planning, and
Engineering Departments. Types of permits
include discretionary plan reviews, building
plan reviews, landscaping plan reviews, and
grading and drainage plan reviews.
TYPES OF PLAN CHECKS (NUMBER COMPLETED)
• Precise grading and drainage (341)
• Hydrology and WQMP (21)
• Roadway design and utilities (95)
• MFR, mixed use, commercial (19)
• Building
- Single family residential (221)
- Walls (123)
- Shoring (23)
- Pool/spa (74)
- ADU (102)
- Tenant improvements (19)
• Landscaping (41)
• Encroachment (9)
“West Coast Civil has provided the City with the
necessary horsepower to erase the backlog of
plan checks and meet City turnaround times.
Additionally they have become an integral part of
our team enhancing our staff capabilities.”
– Matt Kunk, Deputy Director of Public Works
City of Dana Point
REFERENCE
Matt Kunk, PE, Deputy Director of Public Works
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (949) 248-3562
380
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 24
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING
WCC provides support to the City of Solana Beach to review project plans for permits routed through the Building Department, Planning Department, and Engineering and Public Works Department. WCC provides support on a Time and Materials (T&M) basis. Project reviews are coordinated through a point of contact at the City and depending on the City’s workflow, development review services are a hybrid of in-person and remote work using electronic communication and submittal reviews.
WCC provides project plan reviews at all levels, from discretionary and ministerial to encroachment permits. Discretionary and ministerial private development projects are reviewed for general conformance to the current City municipal code and WCC works with the City Departments to develop Conditions of Approval for the projects to be memorialized in a resolution. WCC provides plan check support for survey-related permits including subdivision maps, parcel maps, records of survey, certificates of compliance, easement drawings, dedication plats, and supporting documents.
WCC reviews drainage and hydrology reports for private development projects subject to the City’s grading ordinance and provides plan check comments before the issuance of grading permits. We review preliminary geotechnical reports and provide plan check comments based on the permitted scope of work. Our team reviews and issues encroachment permits for work within the City’s right of way and coordinate Encroachment Maintenance and Removal Agreements (EMRA) with the City.
CITY OF CORONADO ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING
REFERENCE
Dan Goldberg, PE, Principal Engineer,
Engineering & Public Works
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (858) 720-2474
TASK ORDERS
• Storm Water Development Plan Check
• Storm Water Construction Inspections - Storm
Water Program Development
• Storm Water Post Construction Inspections
• Capital Improvement Program Support
• Wastewater Odor Control Enhancements
• Trash BMP Evaluations
• Sanitary Sewer Management Plan Updates
REFERENCE
Kim Godby, Utility Supervisor
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (619) 522-7387
“WCC has worked on several City projects and is highly
responsive to our requests. They are very adept at
narrowing down the root problem and then provides
creative solutions that are economically viable. They are prepared and can speak to virtually all situations we have asked of them. Any unknowns are turned into a challenge with a returned solution. Quality, Responsive, and
Creative.” – Kim Godby, City of Coronado
381
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 25
CITY OF OCEANSIDE ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING
"WCC has been an asset on our on-call water and
sewer design services contract. While the task
order projects are smaller in size, they gave each
project the care and attention needed to make it
successful. They listened to our engineering and
operational needs, have been responsive to our
schedules, and have delivered creative solutions.”
- Mabel Uyeda, Sr. Civil Engineer, City of Oceanside
TASK ORDERS
• Jefferson Easement Sewer Main
• Neptune and Ditmar Sewer Main
• San Luis Rey WWTP Aeration Basin Effluent Piping
Replacements
• Harbor No. 3 Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation
• Pilgrim Creek Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation
• Loma Alta Trunk Sewer Relocation
• North Valley Sewer Forcemain Emergency Repair
• Mission Basin Groundwater Purification Facility
Chemical Feed Replacement
• Mission Avenue Siphon Diversion Project
• Mesa – El Camino Real CIPP Lining Project
• Haymar Sewer Easement Emergency Grading Project
• Land Outfall Hydraulic Analysis
• La Salinas WWTP Decommissioning Planning Support
• Lucky Street Water and Sewer Replacement
• Pilgrim Creek Sewer Lift Station Construction
Assistance
• La Salina Wastewater Treatment Plant Structural
Repairs
• Buena Vista Lift Station Emergency Interconnect
• Mission Basin Sodium Hypochlorite Tank
Replacement
• Mission Avenue Water and Sewer Feasibility Study
REFERENCE
Mabel Uyeda, Principal Water Engineer
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (760) 435-5819
UC SAN DIEGO ON-CALL ENGINEERING
“West Coast Civil has provided exceptional service
on a wide variety of projects for the University. They
have been responsive and a pleasure to work with.”
- Aaron Cooley, PE, UC San Diego
TASK ORDERS
• Campus Fire Water Improvements
• Blacks Beach Access Road
• Grove Water Quality Basin
• Sumner Auditorium Site Improvements
• Munk Lab Watermain Extension
• Scholars Drive Sidewalk Extension
• East Campus Trailer Relocation
• As-Needed Plan Reviews
• Deep Sea Drilling Trailer Replacement
• Adaptive Systems Lab ADA Improvements
• Cognitive Sciences Courtyard Improvements
• Mt. Soledad Drainage and Driveway Improvements
REFERENCE
Aaron Cooley, PE, Project Manager
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (619) 550-7136
382
SECTION 7:
SAMPLE
PLAN REVIEW
CORRECTION LISTS
AND FORMS
383
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 27
CITY OF DANA POINT
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
Drainage Checklist Handout – ATTACHMENT 020b
_Building Permit Checklist - Public Works Revised 41/02/20 Page 1 of 4 ARCH-STRUCTURAL CHECKLIST REV. 06/02/20
If your Plan Review number starts with BLD
Please Submit / Resbumit to Building Dept. Only
Plan Check Number:
Location / Address:
City Plan Checker: Date:
DOCUMENTS
OK NOT
MET N/A
Architectural Plan
Structural Plan
GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
OK NOT
MET N/A
Scope of Work is included and clearly reflects permit applicaiton Correct Address on the Plans
Finished Floor (FF) or PAD Elevations shown on Floor plans & Elevations & Sections
PROPERTY LINE REQUIREMENTS
OK NOT
MET N/A
Property Lines are clearly shown and labeled
384
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 28 _Building Permit Checklist - Public Works Revised 6/2/20 Page 2 of 4 Any Improvements shown in the street Right-of-Way (over from PL) require note:
Separate Encroachment Permit from Public Works required for all work in the Public Right-of-Way.
All other Property Line Improvements (Fences and Walls) labeled Existing or New
SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
No Additional Engineering Concerns from Google Earth or City GIS.
Site Plan clearly reflects the Scope of Work and Permit Application
DRAINAGE PLAN REQUIREMENT
OK NOT
MET N/A
A Drainage Plan is provided clearly showing how the proposed improvements drain to an approved outlet. (Grading Manual Section 11.3 DISPOSAL, 1st paragraph) The Drainage Plan clearly shows the current or proposed drainage patter will not impact neighboring properties. (Grading Manual Section 11.3 DISPOSAL, 2nd paragraph) The Drainage Plan requires a Public Works Inspection prior to final approval All new drainage will be directed to landscape area – NO Infiltration System Required The proposed Improvements are at the roof or upper level only – NO Infiltration System Required The proposed Improvements will have an insignificant impact to the drainage system – NO Infiltration System Required
The proposed improvements may allow chemicals or potential contamination to enter the Storm Drain System – YES, Infiltration System Required
A New Drainage System is proposed – YES, Infiltration System Required
STRUCTURAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
385
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 29 _Building Permit Checklist - Public Works Revised 6/2/20 Page 3 of 4 OK NOT
MET N/A
Structural Plans are signed and stamped by CA Licensed Civil/Structural Engineer or Architect Structural Notes recommend minimum depth of footing 24in below grade Structural Notes recommend minimum concrete strength of 4500 psi Structural Notes recommend Severe Concrete Sulfate Exposure Structural Plan and Details clearly show Minimum Footing Depth of 24in below grade (Per City Standard B013)
Structural Plan and Details clearly show Minimum Footing Reinforcement of 4 - #5 bars, two on top, two on bottom (Per City Standard B013)
Structural Plan and Details clearly show Minimum Slab Thickness of 5in with #4 bars 18in o.c.
Minimum Reinforcement (Per City Standard B013)
Structural Plan and Details clearly show Minimum Slab over 2” of sand over a minimum 10 ml. poly-ethylene vapor barrier, over 2” of sand (Per City Standard B013) Structural Plan and Details clearly show all PAD Footings Depth of 24in below grade (Reinforcement of PAD footings per structural engineer)
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
OK NOT
MET N/A
Structural Calculations use minimum bearing capacity of 1500 psf (Per CBC Table 1806.2) Structural Calculations use minimum passive pressure of 100 psf/ft (Per CBC Table 1806.2) Structural Calculations use minimum Coefficient of friction 0.25 (Per CBC Table 1806.2) Structural Calculations use minimum current ASCE-17 Seismic Design Parameters Structural Calculations use minimum ML-CL Design Lateral Soil Loads Active-60 lbs/ft, At-Rest Pressure 100 lbs/ft (Per CBC Table 1610.1)
386
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 30 _Building Permit Checklist - Public Works Revised 6/2/20 Page 4 of 4 ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________
COMMENTS
387
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 31
CITY OF DANA POINT
PUBLIC WORKS – ENGINEERING SERVICES
33282 Golden Lantern, Suite 212
Dana Point, Ca 92629
949.248.3554
(www.danapoint.org)
Grading Handout – ATTACHMENT 020
_Grading Checklist - Soils Report Revised 6/6/2023 Page 1 of 7
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT REVIEW CHECKLIST
Plan Check Number: _
Location / Address: ______________ _________________________ City Plan Checker: _______________________________________ Date: _________________
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - GENERAL
OK NOT
MET N/A
Signed by RCE/GE
Signed by CEG (Required for Hillside Area)
Project Address
Location Index Map with reference north, scale, etc.
Site Description (topography, vegetation, existing structures/improvements, drainage) Description of Proposed Development (grading, structures/improvements, drainage, use, foundation type, estimated structural loads)
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT – FIELD INVESTIGATION
OK NOT
MET N/A
Site Specific Subsurface Investigation
Description of Investigative and Sampling Methods
Boring/Test Pit Logs (Soil/Bedrock descriptions with depth, type and depth indicated for sampling, real or assumed elevation indicated, groundwater conditions) Sampling performed to anticipated depth of foundations and/or deepest excavation Boring/Test Pits located on Geotechnical Map/Plot Plan
388
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 32 _Grading Checklist - Soils Report Revised 6/6/23 Page 2 of 7 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT – LAB TESTING
OK NOT
MET N/A
Description of lab test performed with referenced test method (ASTM, EPA, etc) Soil Strength (Shear)
Expansion
Sulfate
Gradation
Classification of soil in accordance with ASTM D 2487 (when using California Building Code values for lateral load)
Moisture/Density
Consolidation
Atterberg Limits
Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT – EARTH MATERIALS
OK NOT
MET N/A
Description and designation of geologic units (surficial soils and bedrock, including depth, thickness) Geologic structure (bedding, fracturing, faulting of bedrock material) Description of regional geologic conditions (including reported regional trends of bedding and faulting)
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT – SEISMICITY
OK NOT
MET N/A
General description of regional and local faulting
Site Class
Mapped Spectral Acceleration Parameters (Ss, S1)
Site Coefficients (Fa, Fv)
Design Spectral Acceleration Parameters (SDS, SD1)
Seismic Design Category
389
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 33 _Grading Checklist - Soils Report Revised 6/6/23 Page 3 of 7 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT – GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
OK NOT
MET N/A
Landslide
Expansive Soils
Surficial Slope Instability
Slope Creep
Groundwater
Total and Differential Settlement
Sulfate
Liquefaction
Affect of liquefiable soils on utilities and lifeline services outside of structural mitigation Seismic Induced Landsliding
Tsunami Potential
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT – ILLUSTRATIONS
OK NOT
MET N/A
Geotechnical Map / Plot Plan
Existing topography / improvements
Proposed topography / improvements
Location of subsurface exploration (borings, test pits, etc.) Geologic Contacts
Geologic Structure
Location of fill key / buttress
Geologic Cross-Section
Existing topography / improvements
Proposed topography / improvements
Location of subsurface exploration (borings, test pits, etc.) 390
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 34 _Grading Checklist - Soils Report Revised 6/6/23 Page 4 of 7 OK NOT
MET N/A
Geologic Contacts
Geologic Structure
Slope setbacks
Temporary cuts / shoring
Fill Key / buttress
Slope benching
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT – CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS
Statement as to feasibility of project
Statement as to impact on adjacent properties
Statement of the condition of slopes with respect to stability Slope stability analysis provided to support conclusion/recommendations Statement regarding liquefaction potential
Liquefaction analysis provided to support conclusion/recommedations Grading Recommendations
Remedial grading
Compaction standards
Groundwater Mitigation
Temporary excavation (backcuts, slopes) with time limit recommendations Shoring
Benching
Keys / buttresses
Canyon/Key Subdrains
Foundation Recommendations
Expansive soil mitigation (CBC 1805)
Description of approved embedment material (i.e. compacted fill, terrace deposits, etc) Minimum depth of embedment (into approved material) for foundations 391
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 35 _Grading Checklist - Soils Report Revised 6/6/23 Page 5 of 7 OK NOT
MET N/A
Minimum width of footings
Minimum diameter of caissons
Bearing capacity (end bearing for caissons)
Coefficient of friction (caisson skin friction)
Lateral bearing
Down drag forces (liquefiable soils, typically Beach Rd ) Lateral Spread forces (liquefiable soils, typically Beach Rd) Foundation slope/trench setback
Minimum reinforcement requirements
Minimum slab thickness and reinforcement
Slab underlayment
Soluable Sulfate exposure mitigation (typically cement type) Conventional Retaining Wall Recommendations
Active pressures (level, sloping)
Retaining wall backdrain or recommendation of additional hydrostatic pressure Backfill
Surcharges
MSE Wall Recommendations (facing material, grid, backfill, stability analysis) Flatwork / Hardscape recommendations including driveways (subgrade preparation, minimum slab thickness, reinforcement and joint spacing)
Roadway Pavement recommendations (section design, subgrade preparation) Swimming Pool recommendations
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT – OBSERVATION/TESTING DURING CONSTRUCTION OK NOT
MET N/A
Footing Excavations
Subdrains
392
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 36 _Grading Checklist - Soils Report Revised 6/6/23 Page 6 of 7 OK NOT
MET N/A
Caisson / Drilled Pier excavations (CBC Table 1704.9)
Pool Excavations
Benching
Keyways
Temporary excavations
Geologic mapping of bedrock excavations
Retaining wall backfill
Utility trench backfill
Engineered fill
Hardscape subgrade (driveways, patios, walkways, etc.)
Import soils
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT – REFERENCES
Current / City adopted Building Code
Grading Code
Geotechnical reports / publications / geologic maps
Ariel photographs
Websites
Dana Point General Plan Coastal Erosion Technical Report (Coastal Bluff Areas) GEOTECHNICAL REPORT – COASTAL BLUFF
OK NOT
MET N/A
Top of bluff designation (presented on geologic map and cross-sections) Arial photograph of site showing top of bluff
Bluff retreat rate and total estimated retreat for a 50 year period Codified Bluff top setback (presented on geologic map and cross-sections) Slope stability analysis
References for bluff retreat rate
393
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 37 _Grading Checklist - Soils Report Revised 6/6/23 Page 7 of 7 OK NOT
MET N/A
Slope Stability Setback presented on geologic map (surface expression of 1.5 FS) Total Setback presented on geologic map (greater of A: Slope Stability Setback + 50 yr bluff retreat or B: 10-feet buffer + 50 yr bluff retreat)
Explanation and justification of 40-feet setback deviation Discussion of Hazards listed in the “Dana Point General Plan Coastal Erosion Technical Report” Discussion of mitigation measures presented in the “…Coastal Erosion Technical Report” Discussion of the bluff retreat as presented in the “…Coastal Erosion Technical Report”
HEADLANDS REPORT
• Recommendations do not compromise the existing MSE wall /reinforcement • Min. settlement of at least 1” / 1 ½” (per AMEC) is addressed • Expansion testing and recommendations (required)
Corrosivity sulfate testing and recommendation (required) • Evaluation and recmmendations for ‘active zone’ surcharges • Site specific foundation setback from walls/slopes
• Statement regarding existing subsurface drainage
Include sub-drains on maps and figures
• Recommendation requiring drainage and waterproofing of subsurface structures.
HEADLANDS PLAN
• Include Geo-grid layer elevation
394
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 38
CITY OF DANA POINT
PUBLIC WORKS – ENGINEERING SERVICES
33282 Golden Lantern, Suite 212
Dana Point, Ca 92629
949.248.3554
(www.danapoint.org)
Grading Handout – ATTACHMENT 020b
_Grading Checklist - Standard Revised 29/24/14 Page 1 of 6 GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST- non geotech REVISED 07/24/14
Plan Check Number:
Location / Address:
City Plan Checker: Date:
DOCUMENTS
OK NOT
MET N/A
Grading Plans
Soils Report (less than 1 year old or accompanied by an update letter) Current Title Report (Less than 6 months old)
Urban Threat Runoff Form
Common Wall Agreement
Letter of Permission to Grade Offsite from affected property owner Letter of Permission to encroach easement from affected easement holder Conditions of Approval (if planning permit was required for project) Letter of Permission to drain offsite from affected property owner Letter of Permission to encroach onto adjacent property for construction access (typically for walls) Water Quality Management Plan
Hydrology/Hydraulic Report
Proof of legal signing agent for owner
Copy of Recorded Easements
BMP Report
ENG -
395
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 39 Grading Handout – ATTACHMENT 020b
_Grading Checklist - Standard Revised 7/24/14 Page 2 of 6 Engineer’s Cost Estimate
DEPARTMENT AND AGENCY CLEARANCE
OK NOT
MET N/A
City Water Quality Division ( Water Quality Management Plan) City Traffic Division
City Planning Division
Orange County Fire Authority
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Department of Fish and Game
Army Corps of Engineers
Orange County Harbor, Beaches and Parks
Orange County Flood Control
GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
OK NOT
MET N/A
Plan Sheets are standard 24” x 36”
Font is minimum 1/10”
Each sheet is signed and stamped by Engineer / Architect of record Title Sheet included
Erosion Control Plan included as separate sheet
Topographic Survey included as separate sheet
Current City Standard Border is utilized
Plans are legible and meet current industry standards
396
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 40 Grading Handout – ATTACHMENT 020b
_Grading Checklist - Standard Revised 7/24/14 Page 3 of 6
TITLE SHEET CONTENTS
OK NOT
MET N/A
Standard Grading Notes
Standard Erosion and Control Notes
Project Address
Legal Description is shown and matches title report
Owner statement
Civil Engineer Declaration of Responsibility
Geotechnical Engineer / Engineering Geologist Declaration of Responsibility Name, address and telephone number of Owner (Owner’s name matches title report) Name, address and telephone number of Civil Engineer / Architect Name, address and telephone number of Geotechnical Engineer Name, address and telephone number of Engineering Geologist Benchmark and bearing reference point is called out (based on Orange County Survey vertical datum and recorded map or survey, respectively)
Earthwork Quantities shown (Over-excavation, Cut, Fill, Import and Export Vicinity Map
Tentative Map Number (for new Tracts / Parcels)
APN
Total Impervious Surfaces Quantities, ft2 (Building and Hardscape)
GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Existing and proposed elevations are shown (contours and/or spot elevations) Cut / Fill transitions and daylight contours are shown
Topography extends 25-feet beyond property lines
Grading Limits shown
Property lines shown
397
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 41 Grading Handout – ATTACHMENT 020b
_Grading Checklist - Standard Revised 7/24/14 Page 4 of 6 Scale is indicated
(GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS CONTINUED)
OK NOT
MET N/A
North Arrow is shown
Grading legend is shown and is complete
Tract boundaries are shown (grading in conjunction with tentative maps / multiple lots) Building Numbers (for multiple buildings / lots)
Building footprint (Precise grading plan)
All easements shown
Location of all existing and proposed structures including buried tanks and wells Retaining walls and site walls shown and indicated as being under separate permit with plancheck/permit number listed
Top of wall elevations, top of footing elevations and adjacent grades indicated for retaining/site walls Cross-section detail for retaining walls including sub-drain design Street widths and street centerlines indicated on plans Proposed improvements in public right-of-way indicated as being under separate encroachment permit
Street cross section (1/2 section for individual lots)
Slab on-grade detail for buildings
Driveway section detail
Percent grade of driveway(s) indicated
Temporary slopes / cuts indicated on plans and cross-sections Scaled cross-sections provided
Over-excavation indicated on plans and cross-sections
Shoring indicated on plans and cross-sections
Locations of deepened foundations (caissons, deepened footings, basement footings, etc) indicated on plans and cross-sections
Leach field / seepage pits plotted on plans
398
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 42 Grading Handout – ATTACHMENT 020b
_Grading Checklist - Standard Revised 7/24/14 Page 5 of 6
DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS
OK NOT
MET N/A
All drainage is indicated to be directed to a street, natural watercourse or other approved location Gradients utilized meet minimum acceptable threshold
Earth sheet flow for final grading…1%
Earth sheet flow for preliminary grading…2%
Asphaltic Concrete sheet flow…1%
PC Concrete sheet flow and swales…0.5%
Terrace Drains…6%
Drainage around building(s) meets California Building Code Requirements Minimum slope away from foundations for natural (landscaped) ground...5% for a distance of 10- feet and 2% for distance of 10-feet for impervious surfaces. Note: if physical obstruction or property lines do not allow for 10-feet of distance, than the appropriate gradient (minimum of 2% or 5%) shall be provided to an approved alternative method of diverting water away from the foundation.
Swales within 10-feet of the building foundation shall have a minimum gradient of 2% Typical drainage section(s) is provided. Section(s) shows grades and slopes adjacent to building foundations, weep screed clearances and surface types.
Downspout outlet detail provided
Drainage does not flow over slopes
Velocity reducers are utilized where drains discharge into natural ground Class and size of rip-rap and a detail is provided
Concentrated drainage on natural ground does not exceed 4% gradient Flowline elevations of all swales, conduit and other drainage devices are indicated Top of grate elevations are indicated for all drain inlets Complete details of ALL drainage structures are provided Concrete swale is provided to carry concentrated flows in asphalt sections Subdrains and subdrain outlets (with flowline elevations) are shown on plans Limits of roof gutters and location of down spouts are shown 399
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 43 Grading Handout – ATTACHMENT 020b
_Grading Checklist - Standard Revised 7/24/14 Page 6 of 6 Maximum gradient for sheet flow of 10% is not exceeded
DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED)
OK NOT
MET N/A
Existing off-site terrace and drainage features that affect the project are shown Material for all storm drain and subdrain conduit is specified and in accordance with Subarticle 11.5 of the City Grading Manual
Hydrology Report submitted to address one or more of the following conditions:
A sump pump is proposed
A sump condition exist with no overland relief (pipes carry runoff) Drainage is diverted
Drainage is directed to a natural drainage course
Offsite drainage conveyance is not substantiated to accommodate design flows
HILLSIDE GRADING/SLOPE REQUIREMENTS
Slope Terraces provided as required by Subarticle 11.2 of the City Grading Manual Location of proposed slope keyway and buttress fill shown and grades are indicated Top and toe of cut / fill slopes are delineated and grades are indicated Cut / Fill slopes do not exceed a slope ratio of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) Cross-section of keyway, buttress fill and benching are provided, includes details of subdrain / backdrain system
Slopes conform to City Municpal Code Section 7.08.110
Slope setbacks are indicated on cross-sections and are in accordance with the California Building Code Section (See Attached) and the Geotechnical recommendations
EROSION CONTROL
Adequate perimeter control is shown on plans
A stabilized construction entrance is shown on plans
Material storage area shown on plans
Adequate erosion control measures indicated for graded slopes
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Applicable Conditions of Approval have been satisfied
400
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 44
CITY OF DANA POINT
PUBLIC WORKS – ENGINEERING SERVICES
33282 Golden Lantern, Suite 212
Dana Point, Ca 92629
949.248.3554
(www.danapoint.org)
Grading Handout – ATTACHMENT 020b
_Grading Checklist - Supplemental Revised 15/15/20 Page 1 of 3 GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST- TECHNICAL REVIEW REV. 09/15/20
Plan Check Number:
Location / Address:
City Plan Checker: Date:
GRADING
OK NOT
MET N/A
Property lines shown
Scale is indicated
North Arrow is shown
Grading Limits shown
Total Impervious Surfaces Quantities, ft2 (Building and Hardscape) Accurate Earthwork Quantities shown (Over-excavation, Cut, Fill, Import and Export) Accurate Total Impervious Surfaces Quantities, ft2 (Building and Hardscape) Accurate
Site High Point Clearly shown and labeled
Site Low Point Clearly shown and labeled
Graded Low Point is an approved Drainage Outlet (Assume No Drainage System) Existing and proposed elevations (contours and spot elevations) do not conflict with Low Point Earth sheet flow for final grading…1% minimum
PC Concrete sheet flow and swales…0.5% minimum
ENG -
401
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 45 Grading Handout – ATTACHMENT 020b
_Grading Checklist - Supplemental Revised 9/15/20 Page 2 of 3 Asphaltic Concrete sheet flow…1% minimum
Concentrated drainage on natural ground does not exceed 4% gradient Maximum gradient for sheet flow of 10% is not exceeded
Percent grade of driveway(s) are less than 10% for 10ft and less than 15% after.
Scaled cross-sections for site are provided and clearly show proposed elevations.
Top of wall elevations, top of footing elevations and adjacent grades indicated for retaining/site walls Shoring indicated on plans and cross-sections as needed.
SUBDRAIN DRAINAGE
OK NOT
MET N/A
Sub-drains for all retaining walls and basement walls clearly shown The sub-drain outlets (with flowline elevations) are clearly shown on plans The sub-drain outlets shall be separate from the storm drain system
DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS
OK NOT
MET N/A
All drainage is indicated to be directed to a street, natural watercourse or other approved location All 4” or less Storm Drain Lines are 2% min
All 6” or more Storm Drain Lines are 1% min
No Storm Drain Pipe Sections are less than 1%
Drainage around building(s) meets California Building Code Requirements Minimum slope away from foundations:
5% for natural (landscaped) ground
2% for impervious surfaces
Swales within 10-feet of the building foundation shall have a minimum gradient of 2% Typical drainage section(s) is provided. Section(s) shows grades and slopes adjacent to building foundations, weep screed clearances and surface types.
402
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 46 Grading Handout – ATTACHMENT 020b
_Grading Checklist - Supplemental Revised 9/15/20 Page 3 of 3 Drainage does not flow over slopes
Flowline elevations of all swales, conduit and other drainage devices are indicated Top of grate elevations are indicated for all drain inlets Complete details of ALL drainage structures are provided Existing off-site terrace and drainage features that affect the project are shown Material for all storm drain and subdrain conduit is in accordance with City Grading Manual PVC, SDR 35
PVC Sch 40
RCP
HDPE type S or D
Hydrology Report submitted to address one or more of the following conditions:
A sump pump is proposed
A sump condition exist with no overland relief (pipes carry runoff) Drainage is diverted
Drainage is directed to a natural drainage course
Offsite drainage conveyance is not substantiated to accommodate design flows
WORKING ITEMS FOR REVIEW
OK NOT
MET N/A
Highlight High Point and Low Point
Estimate Flowline of Storm Water with no Drainage System Highlight Storm Drain System to outlet
Highlight Sub-drainage system to outlet
403
SECTION 8:
PROJECT
SCHEDULE
404
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 48 The following is WCC’s anticipated schedule for
methodology and work plan implementation.
1. Document submittal and Initial Review for
Completeness
1 BUSINESS DAY (2 HOURS)
2. Review for Local, State, and Federal
Conformance
1 BUSINESS DAY (1 HOURS)
3. ln-Depth Plan Check and Evaluation
1 BUSINESS DAY (3 HOURS)
4. Cross,Party Coordination
1 BUSINESS DAY (1 HOUR)
5. Development of Corrections Letter
1 BUSINESS DAY (1 HOUR)
6. Final Review and Approval
1 BUSINESS DAY (1 HOUR)
7. Return of Corrections
1 BUSINESS DAY (1 HOUR)
WCC’s schedule for this contract will ensure
timely delivery of services based on the City’s
needs, while maintaining efficient resource
allocation to meet quality standards.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE
Required Minimum Level of Service (from RFP)
1ST REVIEW = 12 WORKING DAYS
2ND AND SUBSEQUENT REVIEW(s) = 7 WORKING
DAYS
WCC’s Typical level of service (from City of Dana
Point, City of Coronado, and City of Solana Beach)
1ST REVIEW= 5-8 WORKING DAYS
2ND AND SUBSEQUENT REVIEW(s) = 3-5
WORKING DAYS
As we have for other coastal cities, WCC will meet/
exceed the turnaround times required by the City.
405
SECTION 9:
COST DATA
406
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 50 As requested, WCC has provided our proposed cost data as a separate attachment.
COST DATA
407
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 51
RATE SCHEDULE
WCC’s approach to providing services under the City’s engineering plan checks contract will be to conform to the City’s current fee schedule and not exceed 85% of the latest adopted city fee schedule. WCC will provide time and materials reviews for multi-family, commercial, and landslide project(s). Rates will be adjusted each calendar year based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index. If professional services are provided in support of litigation or mediation, rates will be charged at a 2.5 times multiplier.
Professional Services Hourly Rates (for Improvement Plan Checks) Standard Billing Rates
Principal Engineer $225
Project Manager $200
Project Engineer $160
Design Engineer $140
Professional Services Lump Sum Rates
Single Family Grading Plan Check (3 Plan Checks) City Fee 85% WCC Fee Precise Grading $2,054.00 $1,745.90 $1,600.00
Retaining Walls $1,417.00 $1,204.45 $1,000.00
Shoring $708.00 $601.80 $550.00
Each Additional (Beyond 3) $391.00 $332.35 $300.00
Water Quality Management Plan Check
Minor/per plan $583.00 $495.55 $450.00
Major/per plan $1,166.00 $991.10 $850.00
EXPENSES
Expenses will be charged to an agreed-upon budget. Mark-ups on expenses include:
• Outside Reprographics - 1.10 x Cost
• Plotting and In-house Reproduction - 1.10 x Cost
• Subsistence - 1.10 x Cost
• Sub-Consultants, Vendors or Subcontractors - 1.15 x Cost • Mileage - Current IRS Rate
408
SECTION 10:
STATEMENT OF
COMPLIANCE
409
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 53 This proposal is in strict compliance with the request for proposal and draft agreement, except for the items listed below:
Exception #1 (Section 7.4)
1. Indicate applicability of liquidated damages to this contract and, if required, indicate an amount to apply.
2. No value is provided in the agreement.
3. Unable to determine at this time. There is a potential cost impact based on the value the city determines for the contract.
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
410
SECTION 11:
OTHER
INFORMATION
411
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 55 WCC does not have any other information to include in our proposal.
OTHER INFORMATION
412
SECTION 12:
GENERAL PROVISIONS
STATEMENT
413
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 57 WCC agrees that in carrying out its responsibilities under this agreement, and in particular regarding the employment of persons and subcontractors working on the project, it will not discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, religion, sex, age, or handicap. In the event any of the work performed by WCC hereunder is subcontracted to another person or firm, it will be done with the approval of the City.
GENERAL PROVISIONS STATEMENT
414
West Coast Civil
550 Seagaze Drive, Suite L101
Oceanside, CA 92054
Austin Frisby
E: [email protected]
P: 858-869-1332
www.westcoastcivil.com
415
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 50 As requested, WCC has provided our proposed cost data as a separate attachment.
COST DATA
416
City of San Clemente On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services 51
RATE SCHEDULE
WCC’s approach to providing services under the City’s engineering plan checks contract will be to conform to the City’s current fee schedule and not exceed 85% of the latest adopted city fee schedule. WCC will provide time and materials reviews for multi-family, commercial, and landslide project(s). Rates will be adjusted each calendar year based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index. If professional services are provided in support of litigation or mediation, rates will be charged at a 2.5 times multiplier.
Professional Services Hourly Rates (for Improvement Plan Checks) Standard Billing Rates
Principal Engineer $225
Project Manager $200
Project Engineer $160
Design Engineer $140
Professional Services Lump Sum Rates
Single Family Grading Plan Check (3 Plan Checks) City Fee 85% WCC Fee Precise Grading $2,054.00 $1,745.90 $1,600.00
Retaining Walls $1,417.00 $1,204.45 $1,000.00
Shoring $708.00 $601.80 $550.00
Each Additional (Beyond 3) $391.00 $332.35 $300.00
Water Quality Management Plan Check
Minor/per plan $583.00 $495.55 $450.00
Major/per plan $1,166.00 $991.10 $850.00
EXPENSES
Expenses will be charged to an agreed-upon budget. Mark-ups on expenses include:
• Outside Reprographics - 1.10 x Cost
• Plotting and In-house Reproduction - 1.10 x Cost
• Subsistence - 1.10 x Cost
• Sub-Consultants, Vendors or Subcontractors - 1.15 x Cost • Mileage - Current IRS Rate
417
Attachment 8
418
Prepared for:
City of San Clemente
Public Works Department
910 Calle Negocio, Suite 100
San Clemente, CA 92673
Contact: Zak Ponsen, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
Phone: (949) 361-6135
Email: [email protected]
Prepared by:
TKE Engineering, Inc.
2305 Chicago Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
Contact: Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D.
Senior Vice President
Phone: (951) 680-0440
E-mail: [email protected]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Technical Proposal
Section 1 | Cover Letter
Section 2 | Background and Approach
Section 3 | Methodology
Section 4 | Work Plan
Section 5 | Project Organization and Staffing
Section 6 | Related Experience
Section 7 | Sample Plan Review Correction Lists & Forms Section 8 | Project Schedule
Section 9 | Cost Data
Section 10 | Statement of Compliance
Section 11 | Other Information
419
P a g e |1
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 1 | COVER LETTER
January 21, 2025
Zak Ponsen, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
City of San Clemente
910 Calle Negocio, Suite 100
San Clemente, CA 92673
Subject: Request for Proposal for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services Dear Mr. Ponsen:
Thank you for the opportunity to present our proposal as a response to the Request for Proposal for On-Call (AsNeeded) Engineering Plan Check Services for the City of San Clemente (City). TKE Engineering, Inc. (TKE) is enthusiastic about the opportunity to assist the City with these services. Our proposal enclosed herein, outlines TKE’s qualifications to provide the requested services to the City. TKE is a full service, multi-disciplinary consulting firm highly qualified to perform any and all City services required to successfully complete the City’s plan checking on a variety of single family residential, multifamily residential, commercial, industrial, public projects, and slope repair projects. We understand that these projects typically include improvements to grading, utility services, street improvements, water quality management, drainage devices, erosion and sediment control plans, retaining walls, shoring and incorporation of storm water runoff treatment systems from water quality management plans (WQMPs), and TKE performs these same reviews for more than 20 municipalities throughout Southern California.
We are enthusiastic about the opportunity to assist the City and are aware of the City’s needs for expeditious review times.
Why should the City choose TKE to provide the requested services? Please consider the following:
A. Firm Identification - Founded in 2000, TKE is a California Corporation, is a full service, multi-disciplinary consulting corporation located at 2305 Chicago Avenue, Riverside, California 92507 and can be found online at www.tkeengineering.com. All work performed for the City will be from our Riverside, California office. We have 25 years of experience with providing plan and map checking, as well as, on-call engineering services to public agencies and are highly qualified to perform the services necessary for project delivery.
B. Names and Titles of Principal Owners- TKE Engineering Inc. has 3 principal owners, Michael P. Thornton, P.E., P.L.S., M.S., President; Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D., Senior Vice President; and Steven W. Ledbetter, P.E., Q.S.D., Vice President of TKE.
C. Authorized Personnel - Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D., proposed Client Liaison/Project Manager, is authorized to negotiate and execute an agreement with the City on behalf of TKE. He will be TKE’s contact person for the duration of the proposal evaluation and contract. He can be reached by telephone at (951) 680- 0440 and e-mail at [email protected].
D. Company History, Experience, and Years in Business - As a firm dedicated to public service, TKE’s experience is exclusively related to review of development projects and publicly funded public works projects. We thoroughly understand all related requirements to protect the City’s interests and avoid any conflicts of interest. TKE was established with the goal of providing turnkey services for municipal land development and public works projects in order to benefit our community. As a result of the focus of our firm on this mission, TKE has earned a reputation for thoroughness, rapid turnaround, cost efficiency and overall quality of services. We are a highly motivated, dynamic firm with the goal of being the City’s preferred consultant. TKE has been providing professional plan check services to numerous municipalities and cities for the past 25 years.
As such, we have a thorough knowledge of City’s standards and requirements.
E. Current Number of Employees, Key personnel – TKE Engineering currently employs 65 Professional Engineers, Plan Checkers, Traffic Engineers, Surveyors, Inspectors, Designers, Project Managers, and Support Staff. Mr.
Renner will be overseeing and managing the work of our key personnel, each of whom have extensive experience providing plan and map checking and related engineering services. Michael Thornton, P.E., P.L.S., 420
P a g e |2
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 1 | COVER LETTER
M.S., Steve Nix, P.E., P.L.S., Brian Wolfe, P.E., M.S., Monae Pugh, Justin Schlaefli, P.E., T.E., P.T.O.E. and Ron Musser, P.L.S. are some of TKE’s proposed Senior Plan Check Engineersthat are knowledgeable in all applicable codes and general engineering practices as related to grading plans and soils reports in compliance with current Building Standards contained in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 as well as the San Clemente Municipal Code.
F. Proposal Validity – TKE’s proposal shall remain valid for a period of 90 days from the date of submittal or receipt of the last best and final offer submitted.
Thank you for your consideration. TKE would very much appreciate the opportunity to provide engineering services. If you have any questions, please call me at (951) 680-0440.
Sincerely,
Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D.
Senior Vice President
TKE Engineering, Inc.
421
P a g e |3
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 2 | BACKGROUND AND APPROACH
SECTION 2 | BACKGROUND AND
UNDERSTANDING
F I R M B A C K G R O U N D
TKE Engineering, Inc. (TKE), a California Corporation, was established in the year 2000, and in the last 25 years has developed into one of Southern California’s premier fullservice consulting engineering firms. TKE was established with the goal of providing turnkey services for municipal agencies in order to benefit our community. As a result of the focus of a firm on this mission, TKE has earned a reputation for thoroughness, rapid turnaround, cost
efficiency and, overall quality of work. We are a highly motivated, dynamic firm with the goal of being your
preferred consultant.
TKE provides turnkey plan/map checking services for
developer and capital improvement projects to
numerous municipalities. The municipal services
provided by our firm include Plan and Map Checking,
Traffic Engineering, Surveying, Inspection, and Project Management services. Our wide range of services
provides our team with an intimate knowledge and
experience of the common pitfalls for each project
variation and our plan checkers ensure developer and
City projects do not fall into the same situations.
TKE’s primary office is located at 2305 Chicago Avenue in Riverside. TKE currently maintains a staff of 65 plan and map checkers, project managers, engineers, traffic
engineers, surveyors, drafters, inspections, and clerical personnel.
TKE continues to be the preferred consultant for a
number of our clients across Orange, Los Angeles,
Riverside and San Bernardino counties because our team
of licensed experts have built strong working
relationships through strategic collaboration,
implementation of industry best practices and lessons
learned on each project; ultimately resulting in
successful project completion to our clients’ satisfaction.
Our team has the capabilities and capacities to support the City of San Clemente (City) in addressing its strategic issues by achieving the following:
• Support and uphold a positive city image
through submission of consistently thorough
and compliant plan checks
• Demonstrating exemplary leadership by holding
ourselves accountable to delivering quality
services
TKE Engineering InAT A GLANCE
On-Call Contracts
TKE currently provides Plan Checking,
Map Checking, Traffic Engineering,
Engineering, Project Support, and
Survey services for more than 30 Cities /
Counties / Districts throughout
Southern California
City/District Surveyor
City/District Surveyor in 9
Cities/Districts
Traffic Engineering
Traffic Engineer in 6 Cities/Districts
City/District Engineer
City Engineer in 5 Cities/Districts
Size of Organization
65 Plan Checkers, Professional
Engineers, Traffic Engineers, Surveyors,
Designers, Design Professionals, and
Support Staff
Years in Business
TKE has conducted business for the past
25 years and has 25 years of experience
in providing plan and map checking
services
Office Headquarters Location
TKE Engineering, Inc.
2305 Chicago Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
Company Structure
TKE is a California C Corporation
founded in June 2000. TKE is not a
subsidiary.
California Business License No.:
0109901
Firm Owners/Officers
Michael P. Thornton, P.E., P.L.S., M.S.
- President
Terry M. Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D.
- Senior Vice President
Steven W. Ledbetter, P.E., Q.S.D.
- Vice President
City of San Clements
Point of Contact
Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D.
Senior Vice President
Phone: (951) 680-0440
Email: [email protected]
TKE Engineering, Inc.
422
P a g e |4
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 2 | BACKGROUND AND APPROACH
• Offering public service excellence through
further development of a strong working
partnership with the City so we may best
understand how to provide necessary services
that are of high priority
U N D E R S T A N D I N G
The City desires to retain qualified professional
engineering firms to provide on-call (as-needed)
engineering review and plan check services to the City
related to grading plans and associated street and on-site grading improvements for residential, commercial,
industrial, public projects, street improvements, and
landslide projects of various sizes. The contractual plan check services are as-needed to supplement the City
staff in order to maintain the City’s review turn-around timeframes for plan check services on grading plan
reviews and to maintain the high level of customer
service expected of its residents. The contract terms
would be for a 2-3 year term with 2 additional 1-year
optional extensions.
The general scope includes but is not limited to
engineering review and plan check for correctness of
plans, design calculation and technical specifications
related to materials for proposed improvements,
development of correction lists and transmittal of
correction lists to the City and applicant.
TKE has over a quarter century of experience performing complete grading plan reviews on a variety of single
family residential, multifamily residential, commercial, industrial, public projects, and slope repair projects. This includes but are not limited to: grading, utility services, street improvements, water quality management,
drainage devices, erosion and sediment control plans,
retaining walls, shoring, and incorporation of storm
water runoff treatment systems from water quality
management plans (WQMPs).
C O N F L I C T O F I N T E R E S T
TKE has no personal or organizational conflicts with
providing services to the City. In addition, TKE provides services to municipal clients only and therefore will
never have any conflicts of interest related to private development projects.
S O F T W A R E
A V A I L A B I L I T Y
TKE has not used E-Plan but is familiar with various
project management software that we utilize for plan
check preparation, monitoring budget and schedule as
well as other project factors, including BlueBeam, Virtual Project Manager, Microsoft Project, Primavera,
Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and AutoCAD. Our key
personnel also has experience using SmartSheets, CIPO,
ACCELA, VPM, Procore, VPO, Zoom, Trakit, Microsoft
Teams, Base Camp, SharePoint, and other project
software needed to successfully implement projects.
A P P R O A C H
TKE’s unique project approach to all projects assigned to TKE, is presented in the following sections.
423
P a g e |5
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 3 | METHODOLOGY
SECTION 3 | METHODOLOGY
M E T H O D O L O G Y
Whether the services required are plan checking, map
checking, traffic, or planning related, successful project delivery is our primary goal. Our definition of successful project delivery is:
• Project Completion that Protects City Interests
• Project Completion that Meets All Project
Requirements
• Project Completion on Schedule
• Project Completion within Budget
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
TKE’s implementation plan includes the following key
elements which we routinely provide for each of our
projects:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
TKE provides effective plan checking, map checking, and project management services to a variety of clients. We have successfully delivered extensive and highly visible development projects, grading improvements, street
improvement, traffic improvement, drainage
improvement, water, wastewater and facility
improvement projects for the County of Riverside and
San Bernardino, Coachella Valley Association of
Governments, Cities of Santa Ana, La Habra, Pico Rivera, Irvine, Wildomar, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Corona,
Calimesa, Moreno Valley, Coachella, Riverside, Banning, Chino, Glendora, El Monte, South El Monte, Corona,
Highland, Hesperia, Colton, Upland, Fontana, Yucaipa,
Rialto, Redlands, and for the Municipal Agencies San
Bernardino Municipal Water Department, Rubidoux
Community Services District, Mission Springs Water
District, East Valley Water District, Mission Springs Water District, Coachella Water Authority, San Bernardino
Municipal Water Department, Rubidoux Community
Services District, East Valley Water District, Three Valleys Municipal Water District, Monte Vista Water District, and Maywood Mutual Water Company. TKE’s approach has
consistently allowed our partner agencies to fulfill their missions of delivering the best value for the public’s
investment.
TKE’s management approach includes:
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORTS
TKE documents project progress for all projects assigned to TKE by a comprehensive project management
summary. The summary includes project name and
related number, description of progress, budget status, schedule compliance, completed deliverables, and
anticipated upcoming accomplishments.
COMMUNICATION
Communications with City staff is another important
component to effective project management. In
addition to the monthly progress reports, TKE meets with clients as needed to ensure the projects are proceeding as anticipated. We document each discussion or
meeting with notes and electronically mail them to the
project team within three days of the
meeting/conference indicating action items and a
schedule for completion of these items. Finally, TKE
welcomes direct lines of communication between the
City and all Key Staff for any and all project needs.
RECORD KEEPING
TKE keeps records in an organized filing system both in hard copy and electronic forms. This organized filing
system allows TKE to access records immediately should
they be needed. Additionally, TKE can provide
comprehensive project records to the City upon
completion of each project.
MEETINGS
TKE meets with project stakeholders as needed including the public, permitting agencies, utilities, etc. We meet with them at the project’s onset and throughout the
course of project development to ensure all stakeholder project needs are considered in the project design. All meeting preparation (City Staff Reports, agendas,
exhibits, slide shows, etc.) will be prepared by TKE for each meeting. Again, meetings will be documented. TKE
has provided numerous similar presentations to Councils (closed sessions, council meetings, community meetings, etc.).
TEAM MEETINGS
Team meetings include all parties that have any interest in the project development. In particular, the City’s
Engineering and Public Works Departments will be close
working partners with TKE in project development and
environmental compliance for capital projects.
DIGITAL PLAN CHECKING
TKE is familiar with digital plan checking and equipped to provide digital plan checking services in several different manners. We have worked with a number of different
City’s which have a proprietary software used for plan
check services. We are also equipped with Blue Beam to
provide fully digital plan checking services. With Blue Beam, the City and development community would also
need to have the appropriate software and computer
capabilities to process and review the plan checks. Many 424
P a g e |6
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 3 | METHODOLOGY
City’s we currently provide plan checking services for, are not yet equipped with these capabilities therefore we
provide another form of digital plan checking to
accommodate such cities. For cities that are not capable of fully digital plan check services, we are able to accept a pdf submittal, review and print necessary plans inhouse and provide pdf plan check plans and reports back to the City.
REGULATORY, SUBDIVISION MAP ACT
AND CITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE
Another primary function of TKE staff is to verify
compliance with aspects of federal, state, and local laws as well as the subdivision map act and City standards.
TKE is already well versed with federal, state and local development law and the map act requirements.
Further, TKE will verify that all construction related to engineering components, are constructed in accordance
with these requirements and standards.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
Environmental permitting for projects within the CIP may be complex and involve coordination with multiple
jurisdictional agencies, in addition to the normal CEQA analysis and determination. Our preliminary review of
the CIP indicates that many projects projected will
qualify for a categorical exemption. Other projects may require some additional environmental permit
requirements including Clean Water Act (CWA) Section
404 permits from the United States Army Corps of
Engineers, CWA Section 401 permits from the Regional
Water Quality Control Board, Section 1602 Permits from
the California Department of Fish and Game and
potential US ESA Section 7 permitting from the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service. TKE has experience in the acquisition of each of these different permit types and will provide excellent management and oversight to
ensure environmental compliance permitting is
implemented.
425
P a g e |7
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 4 | WORK PLAN
SECTION 4 | WORKPLAN
P L A N A N D M A P
C H E C K I N G
TKE has provided numerous municipalities and agencies
throughout Southern California with consulting services and staffing for every facet of Public Works for the past 25 years. In addition, we have worked on multi-milliondollar regional mega projects for a variety of government agencies and master planned developments with more
than 19,000 homes. TKE recognizes the importance of
staffing based on a client’s need and workload. Our
flexible support and qualified plan check staff enables our clients to serve their community in a cost effective and efficient manner.
TKE provides experienced, highly qualified staff with
significant technical expertise and strong public relations skills for plan and map checking. TKE is fully capable of providing plan and map checking staff on a full-time,
part-time, on-call, interim, or project specific
basis. Please refer to our project team presented below together with our corporate resumes to verify our team’s technical ability to deliver these services.
TKE has provided similar services to those requested
here for a number of different agencies. TKE
understands that City’s development and capital
improvement standards were developed to meet the
needs of that particular community. TKE will develop a
thorough understanding of these standards together
with the needs of the community. For each project that
TKE is assigned, TKE will verify compliance with City
standards. Furthermore, with our extensive experience,
TKE will be able to recommend improvements to these
standards to ensure expedited project delivery and
enhanced public infrastructure.
DIGITAL AND STANDARD PLAN
CHECKING SERVICES
• Grading, Slope Stability, Erosion Control and/or
Drainage Plans
• Street and Storm Drain Improvements
• Construction Detour Plans
• Striping and Signing Plans
• Bridge or Retaining Wall Structures not under
Building Permit purview
• Consistency with Other Planned Improvements
• Final and Parcel Maps
• Easement, Dedications
• Vacations, Quitclaims
• Lot Line Adjustments
• Parcel Mergers
• Water Quality Management Plans
PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL ITEMS AND
REPORTS
• Soils/Geological Reports
• Road Structural Section Components
• Hydrology and Hydraulic Calculations and
Reports
• Street Layout Design
• Structure Calculations not under Building Permit
purview
• Traffic Reports or Studies
• Quantity Estimates
• Engineer’s Cost Estimates
• Compliance With Current NPDES Permits
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS IN CITY
ROAD RIGHT OF WAY
• Road Structural Section Components
• Trench Backfill and Restoration
• Storm Drain Line and Appurtenances
• Traffic Signal Components
• Signing and Striping
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
As discussed previously, TKE has extensive experience
with public-side development services processing. TKE
will provide:
• Project Screen Checks
• Respond to Development Inquiries
• Accept Project Submittals
• Review Submittals for Completeness
• Perform Administrative Reviews
• Determine Project Impacts
• Determine Project Impact Fees
• Develop Project Conditions of Approval
• Assist Planning in Preparation for Planning
Commission Consideration
• Review Geotechnical and Slope Stability for
Grading Requirements
• Review Environmental Documents
• Prepare Council Agenda Reports
426
P a g e |8
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 4 | WORK PLAN
• Review Plan and Maps for Regulatory
Compliance
• Review Cost Estimates for Required Bonding
TYPICAL SERVICES
• Review for completeness of developer
application and submittals.
• Review of engineering quantity estimates and
costs.
• Review of rough and precise improvement plans.
• Review of geological and geotechnical reports
for grading plans to ensure recommendations
are incorporated into the grading plans. Note:
actual review and approval of the geotechnical
reports are done through a separate City
contract
• Review of storm drain improvement plans;
hydrology and hydraulic reports.
• Review of street improvement plans, signing and
striping plans, temporary traffic control plans.
• Review of exterior retaining walls and shoring
systems.
• Assist with development of guidelines to help
with the plan checking process.
• Review plans for consistency with other planned
development.
D E L I V E R A B L E S
TKE will provide the following deliverables:
• TKE will inform staff of any potential conflicts of
interest on a project, if applicable; and
• TKE will perform grading plan reviews as needed;
and/or
• TKE will submit clear and concise correction list
to the Development Section of the Public Works
Department for distribution to project
applicant/designer. (General format of TKE’s
correction list shall be reviewed and approved by
the City and may include using electronic plan
review software). The City may elect to have the
project applicant/designer submitted plans
directly to TKE and vise-versa after the initial
submittal in order to help expedite review
turnaround times; and
• TKE will respond to telephone inquiries from City
staff and permit applicants regarding review
comments; and
• When requested, TKE may be required to attend
meetings at City offices or in the field at the
project locations; and
• Perform recheck reviews on projects to ensure
plan corrections have been resolved
satisfactorily; and
• Stamp plans “approved” for compliance with
applicable codes; and
• Return approved plans to Development Section
of the Public Works Department office; and
• Submit bi-weekly progress reports to the
Development Section of the Public Works
Department. Reports shall include up to date
status for each project which has been received
by TKE along with the due date for its review.
427
P a g e |9
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
SECTION 5 | PROJECT
ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING
T E A M E X P E R I E N C E
TKE’s key staff assigned to perform the services required are identified and discussed in detail within the following section. As discussed previously, TKE currently maintains a staff of 65 personnel who are highly qualified to assist with any of the required services for this contract.
TKE has two unique advantages associated with the
experience of TKE’s project team. One benefit of TKE’s
project team is our extremely low internal turnover
rate. As a result of our rigorous interview and testing procedures, coupled with our extremely high employee
satisfaction rates, TKE have several years of experience working together. The close relationships each of our
staff members have with one another provide the City
with an extremely well rounded and experienced
team. As such, TKE’s project team experience directly
correlates with TKE’s firm experience described
previously.
The second benefit of TKE’s project team is our internal training procedures. TKE has strived to develop
techniques that reach outside the box and develop well
rounded individuals committed to providing high quality, efficient services to meet all of our clients’ needs. TKE trains our staff on every facet of engineering design and construction to provide a level of knowledge that can
identify problems in every phase of a project, from
planning through construction and peer review/plan
checking.
It is this commitment to service and diverse array of
offerings that makes us unique and drives our longstanding relationships with our client base.
Understanding that all aspects of on-call miscellaneous consulting and plan checking services are important to
ensure the City’s interests are protected and project
schedules are met, our team brings TKE management
level professionals to projects ensuring that every aspect receives full and comprehensive consideration. It is this personal touch and contact that define our ‘local service’ approach. We consider ourselves community builders
and take ownership of services requested from TKE,
ensuring that our personnel will be allocated on an asneeded basis in order to complete all services on schedule and within specified budget. TKE is committed
to responding to our clients’ needs as they arise.
Terry Renner
P.E., P.L.S, Q.S.D.
Client Liaison/
Project Manager
R.C.E. No. 69984
P.L.S. No. 9762
Q.S.D. Certification No. 24329
Mr. Renner has 25 years of engineering and surveying
experience and also has experience as a Plan Checker
and Project Manager. Mr. Renner is a Registered Civil
Engineer and licensed Land Surveyor in the State of
California. He has extensive experience in the design and construction of public works improvement projects,
including plan checking, project management, design
engineering, construction management and surveying
services. In addition, as detailed on Mr. Renner’s
resume, he has experience with drainage studies
preparation, design and construction engineering for
street, sewer and drainage system improvement
projects. Mr. Renner is well trained in the use of
computerized drawing software. He will assist with
various tasks throughout the course of providing
engineering services, such as base construction
drawings, design and construction estimates.
Mr. Renner’s role on the team will be to manage plan
checking duties, compliance with standards and
regulations and perform quality assurance and quality
control on all documents.
Michael Thronton
P.E., P.L.S, M.S.
Senior Plan Check Engineer
R.C.E. No. 44226
P.L.S. No. 6867
Mr. Thornton, TKE’s President, is
in charge of all TKE projects. He
has over 35 years of experience in engineering planning, design, land surveying and construction management for
public works projects. He has worked on a variety of
public works engineering projects including grading
improvements, street improvements, park
improvements, bike trail improvements, drainage
improvements, single family residential, multi-family
residential, commercial and industrial development
projects. Over the past 25 years, he has served a number of communities as it’s Engineer and has encountered a
428
P a g e |10
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
diverse array of engineering challenges and has delivered solutions to overcome these challenges. Mr. Thornton
has been responsible for plan review services on
developments projects ranging from very small such as a single home for an infill lot to extremely large, including a development with more than 19,000 homes.
Steve Nix, P.E., P.L.S.
Senior Plan Check Engineer
R.C.E. No. 56810
P.L.S. No. 8146
Mr. Nix, has over 39 years of
experience in engineering planning,
design, and construction
management for public works projects. Mr. Nix has
served several cities as it’s resident engineer and other capacities including City of Chino, City of Chino Hills, City of Montclair, City of Ontario, City of Fontana, City of Riverside, and Chino Basin Municipal Water District in
both the public and private sectors. His experience
includes plan review, design and construction
management of all types of civil engineering projects
ranging from grading projects, single and multi-family
residential, commercial and industrial development
projects, public works projects including street, sewer, water, storm drain improvements, water wells
construction including wellhead treatment, sewage and
water pump stations, water reservoirs as well as sewage treatment and transmission.
Justin Schlaefli
P.E., T.E., P.T.O.E.
Traffic Engineer
R.C.E. No. 74670
T.E. No. 2564
Justin has 22 years of experience in
the transportation field. He is
responsible for managing projects on a day-to-day basis as well as interfacing with other project team members
and decision makers/ government staff and Contractors.
He specializes in Intelligent Transportation Systems,
Transportation Planning, Construction, Traffic
Engineering and Traffic Operations. He has experience
working on both public sector projects as well as private sector development. His experience ranges from
construction management and inspection to operations
and maintenance. He also has experience conducting
traffic studies, specialized access analysis, parking
studies, trip generation studies, traffic micro-simulation, signal operations, signal timing, traffic control and
design/build of ITS solutions. In addition, Justin has
served as a subject matter expert in court, for the State of California and for vendors in the transportation
industry. He is also a proud alumnus of San Diego State University where he has been a guest lecturer and has
taught Transportation Engineering, helping to mentor
the next generation in his field.
Brian Wolfe, P.E.
Senior Plan Check Engineer
R.C.E. 69109
Brian Wolfe has over 20 years of
experience in civil engineering and
land surveying for both private and
public sectors of the industry. His
experience in design, construction and plan checking
includes a variety of improvement projects such as street improvements, pavement rehabilitation, signing and
striping, precise grading, water mains, demolition,
reservoir rehabilitation, and sewer mains. He has
provided staff augmentation, capital improvement
design, construction management and plan checking
services for several Southern California public agencies including 5 years with the City of Adelanto. His
experience also includes public works construction
inspection, legal descriptions for easements,
topographic surveying and construction surveying.
Many of his projects involved ADA accessible pathways
and grant funding management such as Safe Routes to
Schools and Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) improvements. Mr. Wolfe is also well versed in
traffic calming, bicycle facility design, warrant analysis and temporary traffic control. Previous traffic
engineering duties included close collaboration with City Police Departments to resolve parking violation
enforcement issues and increasing traffic safety.
429
P a g e |11
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
Monae Pugh
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Monae Pugh has over 32 years of
Municipal and Public Agency
engineering experience with a wide
range of responsibilities and projects emphasizing the
discipline of Transportation and Traffic Engineering. Her most recent experience includes management of both
Land Development and Traffic Engineering Departments
for the City of Fontana. Prior experience includes over 17 years in the County of Riverside Traffic Engineering
Department. She is a Certified Grant Writer through Cal State San Bernardino Certification Program and has
secured multiple Transportation grants for a wide variety of infrastructure projects.
Ron Musser, P.L.S.
Director of Survey
P.L.S. No. 4230
Mr. Musser has over 53 years of
experience in performing field and
office surveying services for public
and private projects including
design surveys and right-of-way acquisition projects.
Prior to joining TKE Engineering, Inc., Mr. Musser worked at the County of Riverside as a County Surveyor for nearly 22 years providing mapping, easement document
preparation, field surveying and calculations support for hundreds of projects. He has prepared records of survey, parcel maps, tract maps, right-of-way and easement
documents in San Bernardino County, Riverside County,
San Diego County, Orange County and Los Angeles
County. He has performed boundary, topographic, ALTA,
and precise level surveys as well as Global Positioning Surveys.
TKE’s professional team is supported by 65 plan
checkers, engineering assistants, and administrative
staff. Corporate resumes along with an organizational
chart for the entire team are presented on the following pages.
430
P a g e |12
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
Traffic Engineer
Justin Schlaefli
P.E., T.E., P.T.O.E.
Available Hours: 5-10
TKE Engineering, Inc.
Director of Survey
Ron Musser, P.L.S.
Available Hours: 20-25
TKE Engineering, Inc.
Client Liaison/
Project Manager
Terry Renner
P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D.
Available Hours: 5-10
TKE Engineering, Inc.
Senior Plan Check
Engineer
Monae Pugh
Available Hours: 20-25
TKE Engineering, Inc.
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Michael Thornton
P.E., P.L.S., M.S.
Available Hours: 15-20
TKE Engineering, Inc.
Senior Plan Check
Engineer
Steve Nix, P.E., P.L.S.
Available Hours: 15-20
TKE Engineering, Inc.
Senior Plan Check
Engineer
Brian Wolfe, P.E.
Available Hours: 15-20
TKE Engineering, Inc.
O R G A N I Z A T I O N A L C H A R T
The following pages includes our firm’s organization chart, time availability and resumes of our key personnel. Our team members will remain available through the life of the projects. TKE can furnish additional resumes for any support staff needed to accomplish the work under this contract. Our team is readily available to you and can coordinate with you at a moment’s notice.
S U P P O R T T E A M
( 65 + M e m b e r s )
431
P a g e |13
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
R E S U M E S
Terry Renner
P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D.
Client Liaison/
Project Manager
TKE Engineering, Inc.
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering, California
State Polytechnic University,
Pomona, CA
REGISTRATIONS
P.E. License Number 69984 (CA)
P.L.S. License Number 9762 (CA)
Qualified SWPPP Developer and
Practitioner #24329
CERTIFICATIONS
Caltrans SWPPP Certified
AFFILIATIONS
Riverside-San Bernardino Counties
Branch, American Society of Civil
Engineers
American Public Works Association
American Council of Engineering
Companies of California
Mr. Renner is the Senior Vice President of TKE and has over 25 years of experience in civil engineering design, plan checking, project management and construction management of both development and public works infrastructure projects, including grading improvements, street and transportation improvements, drainage improvements, water improvements, sewer improvements, facilities improvements and recreation improvements. He currently provides plan checking services for the cities of Calimesa, Upland, Wildomar, Highland, and El Monte. He has managed plan check work on a variety of development projects including small to very large projects as the municipal agency’s technical review staff. He has provided management of development project screen checks, responses to development community inquiries, acceptance of submittals on behalf of agencies, determination of project impacts, development conditions of approval, presentation of projects to planning commissions, preparation of council agenda reports, performed plan checking as well as many other municipal development related services. He has successfully delivered a wide variety of complex and challenging projects and is dedicated to ensuring that the plans produced by TKE continue to exceed industry standards.
DETAILED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• TM 18249; Upland Crossing; Eleventh Street, City of Upland, CA – Mr.
Renner was responsible for water, sewer, drainage, street, grading and water quality management plan check services on a 16 acre, 125 lot, single family development project.
• Tract 18274; Upland Crossing College Heights Basin, City of Upland, CA – Mr. Renner was responsible for water, sewer, drainage, street, grading and water quality management plan check services on a 12-acre, high density development project.
• TTM 18697, City of Upland, CA – Mr. Renner was responsible for water, sewer, drainage, street, grading and water quality management plan check services on a 10-acre, 209-unit mixed use development project. • TTM 18951, City of Upland, CA – Mr. Renner was responsible for water, sewer, drainage, street, grading and water quality management plan check services on a 4-acre, 78-unit high density development project. • TTM 15461, City of Upland, CA – Mr. Renner was responsible for sewer, street, and grading plan check services on a one-unit single family residential development project.
• TTM 26811 Singleton Road, Mastercraft Development, City of Calimesa, CA – Mr. Renner was responsible for precise grading plan check services on the 200-lot subdivision.
• TTM 30386 Bryant Street, City of Calimesa, CA – Mr. Renner was responsible for street and storm drain, grading and signing and striping plan check services on the 400-lot subdivision.
432
P a g e |14
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
• Capitan Leland Norton Elementary School Offsite Water Improvements, San Bernardino Municipal Water District, City of San Bernardino- Mr. Renner was responsible for plan check and adherence to SBMWD design and AutoCAD Standards for approximately 1,500 linear feet of DIP domestic water pipeline and appurtenances ranging from 8-inch to 20-inch diameter. • Wilson II Elementary School Offsite Water Improvements, San Bernardino Municipal Water District, City of San Bernardino- Mr. Renner was responsible for plan check and adherence to SBMWD design and AutoCAD Standards for approximately 1,300 linear feet of 8-inch diameter DIP domestic water pipeline and appurtenances.
• Middle College High School Offsite Water Improvements, San Bernardino Municipal Water District, City of San Bernardino- Mr. Renner was responsible for plan check and adherence to SBMWD design and AutoCAD Standards for approximately 1,400 linear feet of DIP domestic water pipeline and appurtenances ranging from 6-inch to 8-inch diameter.
• PM 17887 Southgate Phase II Tie In Loop, San Bernardino Municipal Water District, City of San Bernardino- Mr. Renner was responsible for plan check and adherence to SBMWD design and AutoCAD Standards for approximately 4,300 linear feet of DIP domestic water pipeline and appurtenances ranging from 8- inch to 16-inch diameter.
• Alessandro II Elementary School Offsite Water Improvements, San Bernardino Municipal Water District, City of San Bernardino- Mr. Renner was responsible for plan check and adherence to SBMWD design and AutoCAD Standards for approximately 700 linear feet of 8-inch diameter DIP domestic water pipeline and appurtenances.
• PM 17772 Hospitality Courtyard, San Bernardino Municipal Water District, City of San Bernardino- Mr. Renner was responsible for plan check and adherence to SBMWD design and AutoCAD Standards for approximately 600 linear feet of DIP domestic water pipeline and appurtenances ranging from 6- inch to 12-inch diameter.
• Stater Brothers Distribution Center, San Bernardino Municipal Water District, City of San Bernardino- Mr. Renner was responsible for plan check and adherence to SBMWD design and AutoCAD Standards for approximately 8,100 linear feet of DIP domestic water pipeline and appurtenances ranging from 4- inch to 16-inch diameter.
• Alliance California Westgate, San Bernardino Municipal Water District, City of San Bernardino- Mr. Renner was responsible for plan check and adherence to SBMWD design and AutoCAD Standards for approximately 1,450 linear feet of DIP domestic water pipeline and appurtenances ranging from 6-inch to 12-inch diameter.
• Parcel Map No. 17003, San Bernardino Municipal Water District, City of San Bernardino- Mr. Renner was responsible for plan check and adherence to SBMWD design and AutoCAD Standards for approximately 1,150 linear feet of DIP domestic water pipeline and appurtenances ranging from 6-inch to 12-inch diameter.
• Track Map No. 17524, San Bernardino Municipal Water District, City of San Bernardino- Mr. Renner was responsible for plan check and adherence to SBMWD design and AutoCAD Standards for approximately 1,300 linear feet of DIP domestic water pipeline and appurtenances ranging from 6-inch to 8-inch diameter.
433
P a g e |15
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
Michael Thornton
P.E., P.L.S., M.S.
Senior Plan Check
Engineer
TKE Engineering, Inc.
EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering, California
State University, Long Beach
B.S., Civil Engineering, California
State Polytechnic University, Pomona
REGISTRATIONS
P.E. License Number 44226 (CA)
P.L.S. License Number 6867 (CA)
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Water Works Association
California Rural Water Association
American Public Works Association
American Council of Engineering
Companies
Mr. Thornton, TKE’s President, is in charge of all TKE projects. He has over 35 years of experience in engineering planning, design, land surveying and construction management for public works projects. He has worked on a variety of public works engineering projects including grading improvements, street improvements, park improvements, bike trail improvements, drainage improvements, single family residential, multifamily residential, commercial and industrial development projects. Over the past 25 years, he has served a number of communities as it’s Engineer and has encountered a diverse array of engineering challenges and has delivered solutions to overcome these challenges. Mr. Thornton has been responsible for plan review services on developments projects ranging from very small such as a single home for an infill lot to extremely large, including a development with more than 19,000 homes.
DETAILED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• City Engineering Services, City of Calimesa – Mr. Thornton provides on-call civil engineering services to the City, including City Engineer.
He managed more than $10 million in public improvements. While providing these services to the City, Mr. Thornton represented the City with other agencies at numerous meetings including RCTC and WRCOG, represents engineering with the City’s council and other public meetings, manages engineering budgets and project schedules, retains other consultants to prepare improvement design projects, manages funding programs, and various related work. In addition, Mr. Thornton manages major development projects. • Hesperia On=Call Plan Checking Services, City of Hesperia – Mr.
Thornton was responsible for providing on-call plan and map checking services to the City. TKE is providing plan checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the City. In addition, TKE is performing plan check on several capital improvement projects within the City.
• Lake Arrowhead Community Service District, City of Colton – Mr.
Thornton was responsible for providing district engineering services to the LACSD including staff augmentation, design, surveying, construction assistance and inspection. TKE serves as District Engineer and is assisting the district with its annual CIP implementation. TKE represents engineering at the district’s board and other public meetings, manages engineering budgets and project schedules, works with other consultants to prepare improvement design projects, and various related work.
• Needles On-Call City Engineering Services, City of Needles – Mr.
Thornton was responsible for providing provides on-call civil engineering services to the city, including City Engineer. TKE currently manages more than $20 million in public improvements.
While providing these services to the city, TKE represented the city with other agencies at numerous meetings, represented engineering with the City’s council and other public meetings, managed 434
P a g e |16
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
engineering budgets and project schedules, retained other consultants to prepare improvement design projects, managed funding programs, and various related work. In addition, TKE managed major infrastructure development projects.
• Mission Springs Water District On-Call Engineering Services, City of Desert Hot Springs – Mr. Thornton was responsible for providing oncall engineering services to the Mission Springs Water District (MSWD) for capital and developer installed water and sewer projects. TKE is working with MSWD staff to manage more than $100 million in water and wastewater CIP projects. In addition, TKE supports the district in several regional water resource planning elements, including Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM), Sustainable Groundwater Management (SGMA), and Salt and Nutrient Management.
• San Bernardino Municipal Water District On-Call Plan Check and Inspections, City of San Bernardino – Mr. Thornton served as the Primary Plan Checker. TKE is providing on-call plan check and inspection services to the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (SBMWD) for developer installed water and sewer projects and capital improvement water system projects. TKE has provided plan checking services for more than 50 small and large tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the City. Services included performing plan checking for water and sewer plans and AutoCAD files for conformance to SBMWD’s design and CAD Standards. In addition to daily inspection services, TKE prepares daily inspection reports, developed construction photo logs, assisted with progress and final payment processing, assisted with change order negotiations, verified compliance with contract documents and approved project submittals, verified public safety compliance, developed remedial work list and system startup inspections. In addition, TKE provides coordination with other project professional services (e.g.
Geotechnical and Surveying).
435
P a g e |17
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
Steve Nix
P.E., P.L.S.
Senior Plan Check
Engineer
TKE Engineering, Inc.
EDUCATION
Chaffey College, Alta Loma, CA
REGISTRATIONS
P.E. License Number 56810 (CA)
P.L.S. License Number 8146 (CA)
AFFILIATIONS
Riverside-San Bernardino Counties
Branch, American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
American Public Works Association
(APWA)
Mr. Nix, has over 39 years of experience as a Civil Engineer. He has worked on a variety of development projects, ranging in size from small to very large, as the municipal agency’s technical review staff. He has provided development project screen checks, responded to development community inquiries, accepted submittals on behalf of agencies, determined project impacts, developed conditions of approval, presented projects to planning commissions, prepared council agenda reports, performed plan checks, seamlessly executed the entitlement process, as well as many other municipal development services. His experience includes survey, design and construction management of all types of civil engineering projects ranging from single and multi-family residential, commercial and industrial development projects, public works projects including street, sewer, water, storm drain improvements, water wells construction including wellhead treatment, sewage and water pump stations, water reservoirs as well as sewage treatment and transmission.
DETAILED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• On-Call Plan and Map Checking Services, Various Cities – Mr. Nix has provided on-call plan checking services to several local Southern California Cities. His experience includes providing plan checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units, and commercial retail centers. His services have included development project screen checks, responding to development community inquiries, performing plan checking for grading, street, storm drain, landscaping, street lighting, traffic signal, SWPPP, erosion control, and WQMP plans, as well as conducting all facets of municipal development related services. • Director of Public Works, City of Montclair – Mr. Nix served as Director of Public Works for the City of Montclair. His project experience includes wet utility relocations necessary to support the extension of the Metro Rail from San Bernardino to Redlands and the Central Avenue Rehabilitation Project between Phillips Blvd and Arrow Route in the City of Montclair. He also provided contract support for plan check services for all Development Projects within the City of Montclair. This included review of entitlement processing and review of all improvements plans and mapping needed to facilitate new development projects, he also provided design, QA/QC and shop drawing review required for Land Development projects.
• Director of Engineering and Operations, East Valley Water District, City of Highland – Mr. Nix served as the Director of Engineering and Operations for the East Valley Water District. He was responsible for daily operations and managing the Capital Improvement Program which averages $5-6M of improvements to District facilities per year.
The Operations Division included both water and wastewater and served approximately 102,000 residents within City of Highland and portions of both City and County of San Bernardino. The Water 436
P a g e |18
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
Division also operates a 8 MGD surface water treatment plant which provides about 1/3 of the potable water used within the District. • Interim Director of Public Works, City of Upland – Mr. Nix served as the Interim Director of Public Works for the City of Upland. Mr. Nix was responsible for overseeing the Public Works Department staff, representing the city with other agencies at numerous meetings, representing engineering to the City’s council and the public, managing engineering budgets and project schedules, retaining other consultants to prepare improvement design projects, managing funding programs, and various related work.
• City Engineer, City of Chino Hills – Mr. Nix served in several capacities throughout his decade of services at the City of Chino Hills. As the Assistant City Engineer, he was responsible for review of all aspects of the Land Development process which included entitlement, improvement plan review, and oversight of construction inspection for all projects within the city. He was also responsible for oversight of the Capital Improvement Program including budgeting, design, construction management and inspection services. Upon promotion to City Engineer, under direction of the City Manager, he was responsible for all aspects of operation of the Engineering Department. His oversight included department operating budget, Land Development, Capital Improvement Program, Traffic
Engineering as well as liaison to the City Public Works Commission and other outside agency committees. As a Licensed Land Surveyor he also functioned as City Surveyor and signatory to all final maps processed within the City.
437
P a g e |19
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
Justin Schlaefli
P.E., T.E., P.T.O.E.
Traffic Engineer
TKE Engineering, Inc.
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering, San Diego
State University, San Diego, CA
M.S., Civil Engineering, Norwich
University, Northfield, VT
REGISTRATIONS
P.E. License Number 74670 (CA)
T.E. License Number 2564 (CA)
CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Traffic Operations
Engineer
IMSA Level II Signal Technician —
Field Certified Fiber Optic Technician
AFFILIATIONS
Former Second Vice President, San
Diego Highway Development
Association
Member National Academy of
Sciences, Transportation Research
Board
Member, Institute of Transportation
Engineers
Mr. Schlaefli has 24 years of experience in the transportation field. He is responsible for managing projects on a day-to-day basis as well as interfacing with other project team members and decision makers/ government staff and Contractors. He specializes in Intelligent Transportation Systems, Transportation Planning, Construction, Signal Maintenance, Traffic Engineering and Traffic Operations. He has experience working on both public sector projects as well as private sector development. His experience ranges from construction management and inspection to operations and maintenance. He also has experience conducting traffic studies, specialized access analysis, parking studies, trip generation studies, traffic microsimulation, signal operations, signal timing, traffic control and design/build of ITS solutions. In addition, Mr. Schlaefli has served as a subject matter expert in court, for the State of California and for vendors in the transportation industry. He is also a proud alumnus of San Diego State University where he has served as a guest lecturer and adjunct faculty teaching Transportation Engineering and helping to mentor the next generation in his field.
Through his career, Mr. Schlaefli has accumulated truly unique experience in Traffic Engineering. For example, Mr. Schlaefli has served as an expert for the State Board of Professional Engineers with respect to creation of the Traffic Engineer license exam. In addition, Mr. Schlaefli has served as a qualified expert witness for the US Attorney’s office in cases involving traffic accidents and traffic signal timing. In addition, Mr. Schlaefli has completed hundreds of traffic and safety studies throughout his career including substantial CEQA/NEPA work. Finally, Mr. Schlaefli has overseen design/build projects for signal modification and ITS improvements including projects in Caltrans jurisdiction and involving multi-agency coordination.
DETAILED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• City Traffic Engineering, Various Cities, CA - Mr. Schlaefli provided oncall traffic engineering services to various Cities. He is currently responsible to review of traffic control plans, land development review of site plans and access management, review and comment of traffic impact studies, traffic engineering project coordination with capital improvement projects, warrant analysis preparation, traffic count coordination, analysis of traffic counts and collision data, traffic control device recommendations, speed zone survey preparation, and certifications, and school zone analysis. While providing these services to the City, Mr. Schlaefli has represented the City with other agencies, consultants and developers at numerous meeting, represented engineering with the City’s management personnel and other public meetings, managed engineering budgets and project schedules. • On-Call Plan Checking, City of Pico Rivera, CA - Mr. Schlaefli served as the Traffic Engineer. TKE provides on-call plan and map checking services to the City. TKE is providing plan checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the City. In addition, TKE is 438
P a g e |20
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
Vice President of Professional
Development, San Diego State
University Alumni Board of Advisors
Adjunct Faculty, San Diego State
University
performing plan check on several capital improvement projects within the City.
• On-Call Plan Checking, City of Hesperia, CA – Mr. Schlaefli served as the Traffic Engineer. TKE provides on-call plan and map checking services to the City. TKE is providing plan checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the City. In addition, TKE is performing plan check on several capital improvement projects within the City.
• On-Call Plan Checking, City of Highland, CA - Mr. Schlaefli served as the Traffic Engineer. TKE provides on-call plan and map checking, civil engineering and inspection services to the City of Highland for Capital Improvement project coordination, planning and implementation.
TKE is assisting the City Engineer with more than $7 million in Capital Improvements Projects for the current fiscal year. TKE simultaneously prepared numerous grant applications, performed plan checking on CIP, represented the City with other agencies at various meetings, represented Engineering with the City’s council and other public meetings, managed engineering budgets and project schedules, prepared and acquired right-of-way, managed funding programs, provided construction management and inspection services, as well as public relations and various related work.
• On-Call Plan Checking, City of Calimesa, CA - Mr. Schlaefli served as the Traffic Engineer. TKE provides on-call plan and map checking services to the City of Calimesa. TKE is providing plan checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the City. • Plan Check for Signal Synchronization System, Coachella- Justin served as the project manager providing plan check services for the City of Coachella’s Signal Synchronization System project. This work involved field constructability review, plan check and comment and wireless signal testing. Working with City staff and consultant designer, potential issues were discussed including filled and potentially broken conduit, conduit not meeting fiber standards, wireless backhaul testing, location and design of TMC and more. This led to suggested changes as the project moved forward.
439
P a g e |21
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
Brian Wolfe
P.E., M.S.
Senior Plan Check
Engineer
TKE Engineering, Inc.
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering, California
State Polytechnic University,
Pomona, CA
M.S., Civil Engineering, California
State Polytechnic University,
Pomona, CA
REGISTRATIONS
P.E. License Number 69109 (CA)
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE)
Past-President, San
Bernardino/Riverside County Branch
Mr. Wolfe has over 20 years of experience in civil engineering and land surveying for both private and public sectors of the industry. His experience in design, construction and plan checking includes a variety of improvement projects such as street improvements, pavement rehabilitation, signing and striping, precise grading, water mains, demolition, reservoir rehabilitation, and sewer mains. He has provided staff augmentation, capital improvement design, construction management and plan checking services for several Southern California public agencies including 5 years with the City of Adelanto. His experience also includes public works construction inspection, legal descriptions for easements, topographic surveying and construction surveying.
Many of his projects involved ADA accessible pathways and grant funding management such as Safe Routes to Schools and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) improvements. Mr. Wolfe is also well versed in traffic calming, bicycle facility design, warrant analysis and temporary traffic control. Previous traffic engineering duties included close collaboration with City Police Departments to resolve parking violation enforcement issues and increasing traffic safety.
Mr. Wolfe has written and presented many staff reports for recommend action to commissions as well as contract awards for City council.
Recommended action often required close coordination with the public and businesses. Mr. Wolfe has represented the city at numerous regional meetings with SBCTA and Caltrans.
DETAILED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• On-Call Plan and Map Checking Services, Various Cities- Mr. Wolfe has provided on-call plan checking services to several local Southern California Cities. His experience includes providing plan checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units, and commercial retail centers. His services have included development project screen checks, responding to development community inquiries, performing plan checking for grading, street, storm drain, landscaping, street lighting, traffic signal, SWPPP, erosion control, and WQMP plans, as well as conducting all facets of municipal development related services. • City Engineering Services, City of Adelanto – Mr. Wolfe provided full time civil engineering services to the city, as the City Engineer. While providing these services to the city, he has represented the city with other agencies at numerous meetings, represented engineering with the City’s council and other public meetings, managed engineering budgets and project schedules, retained other consultants to prepare improvement design projects, managed funding programs, and various related work. In addition, and he has managed infrastructure development projects.
440
P a g e |22
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
• Tract 20017; Spanish Trails, City of Upland- Mr. Wolfe was responsible for water, sewer, drainage, street, WQMP, SWPPP and grading plan check services on a 4.75-acre, residential development project.
• CDBG Street Improvement Project, City of El Monte- Mr. Wolfe was responsible for design of CDBG funded pavement rehabilitation on Klingerman Street, Strozier Avenue and Fern Street for the City of El Monte. This project consists of the preparation of full Construction documents including plans, technical specifications, construction cost estimates (PS&E) and construction support services for the design of the pavement rehabilitation, curb, gutter, sidewalk, ADA curb ramps, and striping replacement.
• County Line Transportation Corridor (LPP), City of Calimesa- Mr.
Wolfe served as the project engineer for the County Line Transportation Corridor (LPP) project. TKE is preparing street widening and roundabout improvements for the construction of the County Line Road Transportation Corridor.
• Juvenile Detention Center Parking Lot - County of San Bernardino– Mr. Wolfe was the Project Engineer for this project where TKE provided project management and design services in three progressive phases, 65% Level Completion, 90% Level Completion and 100% Level Completion. In addition, TKE assisted with Advertising and Bidding Services and Construction Support. The Team conducted records research to establish survey records, and conducted a conventional design survey. TKE prepared base construction drawings and performed careful field review to ensure all underground facilities were shown correctly. The Team prepared a parking master layout for the juvenile secured parking lot expansion and proposed various alternatives to County staff. 441
P a g e |23
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
Monea Pugh
Senior Plan Check
Engineer
TKE Engineering, Inc.
EDUCATION
University of California Berkley
Institute of Transportation Engineers
AFFILIATIONS
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Ms. Pugh has over 32 years of Municipal and Public Agency engineering experience with a wide range of responsibilities and projects emphasizing the discipline of Transportation and Traffic Engineering. Her most recent experience includes management of both Land Development and Traffic Engineering Departments for the City of Fontana. Prior experience includes over 17 years in the County of Riverside Traffic Engineering Department. Ms.
Pugh has actively pursued continuing education throughout her career through U.C. Berkley extension courses offered by the Institute of Transportation Studies and couples this with functional engineering experience. She is a Certified Grant Writer through Cal State San Bernardino Certification Program and has secured multiple Transportation grants for a wide variety of infrastructure projects.
DETAILED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• City of Hesperia Traffic Engineering, City of Hesperia – Ms. Pugh provides on-call traffic engineering services to the City. She is currently responsible for review of traffic control plans, land development review of site plans and access management, review and comment of traffic impact studies, traffic engineering project coordination with capital improvement projects, warrant analysis preparation, traffic count coordination, analysis of traffic counts and collision data, traffic control device recommendations, speed zone survey preparation and certifications, and school zone analysis.
While providing these services to the City, Ms. Pugh has represented the City with other agencies, consultants and developers at numerous meeting, represented engineering with the City’s management personnel and other public meetings, managed engineering budgets and project schedules.
• City of Corona Traffic Engineering Services, City of Corona – Ms.
Pugh provides on-call traffic engineering services to the City of Corona. She managed numerous in-house traffic signal designs, reviewed developer submitted traffic impact reports, provide plan checking on traffic control plans submitted for developer projects and capital improvement projects. While providing these services to the City, Ms. Pugh has represented the City during meetings with City consultants and developers, managed engineering budgets and project schedules, and various related work.
• City of Calimesa Traffic Engineering, City of Calimesa – Ms. Pugh provide on-call traffic engineering services to the City. She is currently responsible for review of traffic control plans, land development review of site plans and access management, review and comment of traffic impact studies, traffic engineering project coordination with capital improvement projects, warrant analysis preparation, traffic count coordination, analysis of traffic counts and collision data, traffic control device recommendations, speed zone survey preparation and certifications, and school zone analysis. 442
P a g e |24
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
• On-Call Traffic Engineering, City of Wildomar – Ms. Pugh provides on-call traffic engineering services to the City. She is currently responsible for review of traffic control plans, land development review of site plans and access management, review and comment of traffic impact studies, traffic engineering project coordination with capital improvement projects, warrant analysis preparation, traffic count coordination, analysis of traffic counts and collision data, traffic control device recommendations, speed zone survey preparation and certifications, and school zone analysis. While providing these services to the City, Ms. Pugh has represented the City with other agencies, consultants and developers at numerous meeting, represented engineering with the City’s management personnel and other public meetings, managed engineering budgets and project schedules. The project duration was from (2015 – present).
443
P a g e |25
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
Ron Musser
P.L.S.
Director of Survey
TKE Engineering, Inc.
REGISTRATIONS
P.L.S. License Number 4230 (CA)
Mr. Musser has over 53 years of experience in performing field and office surveying and plan checking services for public and private projects including roadway and highway projects. He has performed design topographic surveying and construction staking on all of TKE’s respective design and construction management projects and map checking over the past 10 years.
In addition, he has prepared records of survey, parcel maps and tract maps in San Bernardino County, Riverside County, San Diego County, Orange County and Los Angeles County. He has performed boundary, topographic, ALTA, and precise level surveys as well as Global Positioning Surveys. Mr.
Musser currently provides map checking services to the cities of Calimesa, Upland, Azusa, Pico Rivera and El Monte.
DETAILED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• On-Call Survey and Map Checking Services, City of Calimesa, CA - Mr. Musser provides on-call map checking services to the City of Calimesa. Mr. Musser is providing map checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the City. Services include closure calculations, development project screen checks, response to development community inquiries, perform map checking for tract maps, parcel maps, lot line adjustments, lot mergers, records of survey, corner records, easement and right-of-way acquisitions. • On-Call Survey and Map Checking Services, City of Hesperia, CA - Mr. Musser provides on-call map checking services to the City of Hesperia. Mr. Musser is providing map checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the City. Services include closure calculations, development project screen checks, response to development community inquiries, perform map checking for tract maps, parcel maps, lot line adjustments, lot mergers, records of survey, corner records, easement and right-of-way acquisitions. • On-Call Map Checking Services, City of Upland, CA - Mr. Musser provides on-call map checking services to the City of Upland. Mr.
Musser is providing map checking services for several tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the City. Services include closure calculations, development project screen checks, response to development community inquiries, perform map checking for tract maps, parcel maps, lot line adjustments, lot mergers, records of survey, corner records, easement and right-of-way acquisitions.
• Tract Map 18697, City of Upland, CA - TM 18697 – Mr. Musser was responsible for Tract Map plan check services on a 10-acre, 209-unit mixed use development project, including final map approval and closure calculations.
• Westwood College Lot Line Adjustment, City of Upland, CA – Mr.
Musser was responsible for plan check services on a lot line 444
P a g e |26
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
adjustment to move a parcel that was located down the middle of an existing building on the Campus of Westwood College. • Tract Map 72264, City of El Monte, CA – Mr. Musser was responsible for Tract Map plan check services on a 1.77-acre, 9-unit residential project, including final map approval and closure calculations. • Dunkin Donuts, City of Upland, CA – Mr. Musser was responsible for plan check services on a certificate of correction for Tract Map 16416 to correct information on the tags set for the tract map. • Parcel Map 72652, City of El Monte, CA – Mr. Musser was responsible for Parcel Map plan check services on a 0.62 acre, 4 lot commercial development project, including final map approval and closure calculations.
• Parcel Map 72890, City of El Monte, CA – Mr. Musser was responsible for Parcel Map plan check services on a 0.55-acre, 3-unit residential development project, including final map approval and closure calculations.
• Tract Map 73146 City of Pico Rivera, CA – TM 73146 – Mr. Musser was responsible for Tract Map plan check services on a 0.5 acre, 7 lot residential development project, including final map approval and closure calculations.
• Tract Map 65563 City of Pico Rivera, CA – TM 65563 – Mr. Musser was responsible for Tract Map plan check services on a 0.9-acre, single lot development project for condominium purposes, including final map approval and closure calculations.
• Tract Map 72952 City of Pico Rivera, CA – TM 72952 – Mr. Musser was responsible for Tract Map plan check services on a 0.9-acre, single lot development project for condominium purposes, including final map approval and closure calculations.
445
P a g e |27
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 5 | PROJECT ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
I N F O R M A T I O N A N D S U P P O R T R E Q U I R E D B Y C I T Y
P E R S O N N E L
TKE anticipates City personnel will provide any conditions of approval for each project, direction on requests by developers to be exempt on any special City code requirements, political items within the City related to any specific projects and coordination between departments for environmental, utility and building and safety requirements. 446
P a g e |28
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 6 | RELATED EXPERIENCE
SECTION 6 | RELATED EXPERIENCE
PICO RIVERA ON-CALL PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
City of Pico Rivera, CA
Client Contact: Noe Negrete, Director of Public Works
6615 Passons Blvd, Pico Rivera, CA 90660
Phone Number: (562) 801-4389
Email: [email protected]
Project Cost: $N/A
Completion Date: Ongoing
DESCRI PTION RELEVANCE TO
SAN CLEMENTE
• On-Call Development
and CIP Plan
Checking Contract
• Conditions of
Approval
Development
• CIP Implementation
• Project Management
TKE provides on-call plan and map checking services to the City of Pico Rivera. TKE is providing plan checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the City. In addition, TKE is performing plan check on several capital improvement projects within the City.
SERVI CES
Services included development project screen checks, response to development community inquiries, accept submittals on behalf of agencies, determine project impacts, develop conditions of approval, present projects to planning commissions, prepare council agenda reports, perform plan and map checking for grading, street, storm drain, hydrology, hydraulics, landscaping, street lighting, traffic signal, SWPPP, erosion control, and WQMP plans as well as many other municipal development related services.
KEY STA FF
Michael Thornton, P.E., P.L.S., M.S. (Senior Plan Checker), Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D. (Project Manager), Ron Musser, P.L.S. (Director of Survey), Monae Pugh (Senior Plan Checker), Justin Schlaefli, P.E., T.E., P.T.O.E. (Traffic Engineer/Senior Plan Checker), Steve Nix, P.E., P.L.S. (Senior Plan Checker), Brian Wolfe, P.E. (Senior Plan Checker)
447
P a g e |29
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 6 | RELATED EXPERIENCE
HIGHLAND ON-CALL PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
City of Highland, CA
Client Contact: Carlos Zamano, City Manager
27215 Baseline, Highland, CA 92346
Phone Number: (909) 864-6861
Email: [email protected]
Project Cost: $7.0 million to date
Completion Date: Ongoing
DESCRI PTION RELEVANCE TO
SAN CLEMENTE
• On-Call Development
and CIP Plan
Checking Contract
• Conditions of
Approval
Development
• CIP Implementation
• Project Management
TKE provides on-call plan and map checking, civil engineering and inspection services to the City of Highland for Capital Improvement project coordination, planning and implementation. TKE is assisting the City Engineer with more than $7 million in Capital Improvements projects for the current fiscal year. While providing these services to the City, TKE prepared numerous grant applications, performed plan checking on Capital Improvement projects, represented the City with other agencies at numerous meeting, represented engineering with the City’s council and other public meetings, managed engineering budgets and project schedules, prepared and acquired right-of-way, managed funding programs, provided plan and map checking for capital improvement projects, provided construction management and inspection services, provided public relations and various related work.
SERVI CES
Services included development project screen checks, response to development community inquiries, accept submittals on behalf of agencies, determine project impacts, develop conditions of approval, present projects to planning commissions, prepare council agenda reports, perform plan and map checking for grading, street, storm drain, hydrology, hydraulics, landscaping, street lighting, traffic signal, SWPPP, erosion control, and WQMP plans as well as many other municipal development related services.
KEY STA FF
Michael Thornton, P.E., P.L.S., M.S. (Senior Plan Checker), Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D. (Project Manager), Ron Musser, P.L.S. (Director of Survey)
448
P a g e |30
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 6 | RELATED EXPERIENCE
CALIMESA ON-CALL PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
City of Calimesa, CA
Client Contact: Will Kolbow, City Manager
908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, CA 92320
Phone Number: (909) 795-9801
Email: [email protected]
Project Cost: $N/A
Completion Date: Ongoing
DESCRI PTION RELEVANCE TO
SAN CLEMENTE
• On-Call Development
and CIP Plan
Checking Contract
• Conditions of
Approval
Development
• Entitlement Review
• Staff Augmentation:
• City Engineer
• Project Manager
TKE provides on-call plan and map checking services to the city. TKE is providing plan checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the city.
SERVI CES
Services included development project screen checks, response to development community inquiries, accept submittals on behalf of agencies, determine project impacts, develop conditions of approval, present projects to planning commissions, prepare council agenda reports, perform plan and map checking for grading, street, storm drain, hydrology, hydraulics, landscaping, street lighting, traffic signal, SWPPP, erosion control, and WQMP plans as well as many other municipal development related services.
KEY STA FF
Michael Thornton, P.E., P.L.S., M.S. (Senior Plan Checker), Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D. (Project Manager), Ron Musser, P.L.S. (Director of Survey), Monae Pugh (Senior Plan Checker), Steve Nix, P.E., P.L.S. (Senior Plan Checker)
449
P a g e |31
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 6 | RELATED EXPERIENCE
HESPERIA ON-CALL PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
City of Hesperia, CA
Client Contact: Nils Bentson, City Manager
9700 Seventh Avenue, Hesperia, CA 92345
Phone Number: (760) 947-1901
Email: [email protected]
Project Cost: $20.0+ million to date
Completion Date: Ongoing
DESCRI PTION RELEVANCE TO
SAN CLEMENTE
• On-Call Development
and CIP Plan
Checking Contract
• Conditions of
Approval
Development
• Entitlement Review
• Staff Augmentation:
• City Engineer
• Project Manager
TKE provides on-call plan and map checking services to the City. TKE is providing plan checking services for several small and large tract developments, single family residential units and commercial retail centers within the City. In addition, TKE is performing plan check on several capital improvement projects within the City. TKE also provides on-call civil engineering services to the City, including City Engineer. TKE managed more than $20 million in public improvements. While providing these services to the City, TKE represented the City with other agencies at numerous meeting, represented engineering with the City’s council and other public meetings, managed engineering budgets and project schedules, retained other consultants to prepare improvement design projects, managed funding programs, and various related work. In addition, TKE managed major infrastructure development projects.
SERVI CES
Services included development project screen checks, response to development community inquiries, accept submittals on behalf of agencies, determine project impacts, develop conditions of approval, present projects to planning commissions, prepare council agenda reports, perform plan and map checking for grading, street, storm drain, hydrology, hydraulics, landscaping, street lighting, traffic signal, SWPPP, erosion control, and WQMP plans as well as many other municipal development related services. council report preparation, design, review and preparation of hydrology and hydraulic studies, project planning, review traffic impact studies, prepare grant funding applications, report preparation, surveying, project scoping, environmental compliance services, utility coordination, right-of-way acquisition documents, provided project management, performed construction management, inspection and negotiation with property owners.
KEY STA FF
Michael Thornton, P.E., P.L.S., M.S. (Senior Plan Checker), Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D. (Project Manager), Ron Musser, P.L.S. (Director of Survey), Monae Pugh (Senior Plan Checker), Justin Schlaefli, P.E., T.E., P.T.O.E. (Traffic Engineer/Senior Plan Checker), Steve Nix, P.E., P.L.S. (Senior Plan Checker) 450
P a g e |32
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 6 | RELATED EXPERIENCE
COLTON ON-CALL PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
City of Colton, CA
Client Contact: Victor Ortiz, Engineering Manager
160 South 10th Street, Colton, CA 92324
Phone Number: (909) 514-4210
Email: [email protected]
Project Cost: $N/A
Completion Date: Ongoing
DESCRI PTION RELEVANCE TO
SAN CLEMENTE
• On-Call Development
and CIP Plan
Checking Contract
• Conditions of
Approval
Development
TKE was selected to provide on-call plan and map checking services to the City of Colton. TKE provides plan checking services for the CalPortland/Colton Cement Plant development project, Agua Mansa Road Parcel Map 19741, 1350 Reche Canyon Road, and 1600 East Ashley Way Parcel Map 20080, all within the city.
Since 2017, TKE has provided plan and map checking services to the City of Colton.
SERVI CES
Services included development project screen checks, response to development community inquiries, perform plan and map checking for grading, street, drainage, hydrology, and hydraulics, as well as many other municipal development related services.
KEY STA FF
Michael Thornton, P.E., P.L.S., M.S. (Senior Plan Checker), Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D. (Project Manager), Ron Musser, P.L.S. (Director of Survey), Monae Pugh (Senior Plan Checker), 451
P a g e |33
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 6 | RELATED EXPERIENCE
WILDOMAR ON-CALL PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
City of Colton, CA
Client Contact: Dan York, City Manager
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 201, Wildomar, CA 92595 Phone Number: (951) 677-7751 ext. 216
Email: [email protected]
Project Cost: $N/A
Completion Date: Ongoing
DESCRI PTION RELEVANCE TO
SAN CLEMENTE
• On-Call Development
and CIP Plan
Checking Contract
• Conditions of
Approval
Development
TKE provides on-call plan and map checking services to the City. TKE is providing plan checking services for several small and large tract developments and commercial retail centers within the City. TKE utilizes the City’s online system (Citrix) for access and uploading of plan check documents.
SERVI CES
Services included development project screen checks, response to development community inquiries, determine project impacts, develop conditions of approval, perform plan and map checking for grading, street, storm drain, hydrology, hydraulics, landscaping, street lighting, traffic signal, SWPPP, erosion control, and WQMP plans.
KEY STA FF
Michael Thornton, P.E., P.L.S., M.S. (Senior Plan Checker), Terry Renner, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D. (Project Manager), Ron Musser, P.L.S. (Director of Survey), Steve Nix, P.E., P.L.S. (Senior Plan Checker), 452
P a g e |34
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 6 | RELATED EXPERIENCE
R E F E R E N C E S
Please see the table below for a representative list of agencies who have and continue to request TKE to assist them in delivering valuable projects to their communities. We respectfully request that you verify our qualifications with the listed references.
AGENCY CONTACT NAME PHONE NUMBER
City of Pico Rivera
6615 Passons Blvd.
Pico Rivera, Ca 90660
Noe Negrete
Director of Public Works (562) 801-4389
City of Highland
27225 Baseline
Highland, CA 92346
Octavio Duran
Public Works Director/City Engineer
(909) 864-6862
Ext. 221
City of Calimesa
908 Park Avenue
Calimesa, CA 92320
Will Kolbow
City Manager (909) 795-9801
City of Coachella
53990 Enterprise Way
Coachella, CA 92236
Andrew Simmons
Public Works Director
(760) 398-5744
Ext. 134
City of Colton
650 N La Cadena Drive
Colton, CA 92324
Victor Ortiz
Engineering Manager (909) 514-4210
City of Wildomar
23873 Clinton Keith Road
Suite 201
Wildomar, CA 92595
Daniel York
City Manager
(951) 677-7751
Ext. 216
453
P a g e |35
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 7 | SAMPLE PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION
LISTS & FORMS
SECTION 7 | SAMPLE PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LISTS & FORMS 454
P a g e |36
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 7 | SAMPLE PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION
LISTS & FORMS
455
P a g e |37
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 7 | SAMPLE PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION
LISTS & FORMS
456
P a g e |38
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 7 | SAMPLE PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION
LISTS & FORMS
457
P a g e |39
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 7 | SAMPLE PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION
LISTS & FORMS
458
P a g e |40
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 7 | SAMPLE PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION
LISTS & FORMS
459
P a g e |41
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 7 | SAMPLE PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION
LISTS & FORMS
460
P a g e |42
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 7 | SAMPLE PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION
LISTS & FORMS
461
P a g e |43
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 8 | PROJECT SCHEDULE
SECTION 8 | PROJECT SCHEDULE
R E S P O N S E T I M E
TKE will respond to the City’s needs as they arise and diligently stay on schedule. As discussed in previous sections of this proposal, TKE’s management staff meet weekly to assign staff for the needs of each plan check to ensure the project receives the required attention to stay on schedule. Because of TKE’s proactive management approach, TKE rarely experiences “crisis” project delivery needs. When requested by our clients, TKE adds resources, commits extended work hours, develops an efficient implementation plan, and other efforts as needed.
C O M P L E T I O N T I M E
TKE will commit to the following schedule for work completion:
• 1st review = 12 working days
• 2nd and subsequent reviews = 7 working days
462
P a g e |44
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 9 | COST DATA
SECTION 9 | COST DATA
Per the instruction in the RFP, TKE’s fees and rates have been uploaded as a separate file onto the City’s online procurement portal, PlanetBids.
463
P a g e |45
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 10 | STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
SECTION 10 | STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
This proposal is in strict compliance with the Request for Proposal and Draft Agreement and no exceptions to either are proposed.
464
P a g e |46
Request for Proposals for On-Call (As-Needed) Engineering Plan Check Services City of San Clemente
SECTION 11 | OTHER INFORMATION
SECTION 11 | OTHER INFORMATION
No additional information is included or required.
465
466
Revised June 2024
RATE SCHEDULE
2024-2025
HOURLY
RATE
Principal in Charge.. .......... .......... .......... ...................... .......... .......... .......... $155.00 Project Manager/Construction Manager/Licensed Surveyor ..... .......... .......... $150.00 Senior Engineer/Project Engineer (PE)/Senior Plan Checker.... .......... .......... $145.00 Associate Engineer . .......... .......... .......... ...................... .......... .......... .......... $135.00 Assistant Engineer/Plan Checker/Designer.................... .......... .......... .......... $130.00 AutoCAD Technician.......... .......... .......... ...................... .......... .......... .......... $120.00 Engineering Technician...... .......... .......... ...................... .......... .......... .......... $100.00 Clerical ........ .......... ......... .......... .......... ...................... .......... .......... .......... $ 85.00 Forensic Engineering ......... .......... .......... ...................... .......... .......... .......... $195.00 Expert Witness Testimony .......... .......... ...................... .......... .......... .......... $330.00
SURVEYING SERVICES
2-Man Survey Crew (Prevailing Wage).... ...................... .......... .......... .......... $260.00
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Senior Construction Inspector (Prevailing Wage) ........... .......... .......... .......... $135.00 Construction Inspector (Prevailing Wage) ...................... .......... .......... .......... $125.00
REIMBURSABLE COSTS
In-house Reproduction ...... .......... .......... ...................... .......... .......... .......... Cost Printing and Materials ........ .......... .......... ...................... .......... .......... .......... Cost + 10% Express Mail/Courier/Next Day Service .. ...................... .......... .......... .......... Cost + 10% Special Subconsultant Services ... .......... ...................... .......... .......... .......... Cost + 10% For items with fixed fees, TKE proposes to invoice 80% of the City's collected fee per fee table effective July 1, 2024. For items that do not have fixed fees, TKE proposes to invoice on time and materials basis in accordance with the rate schedule shown below:
467
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11H.
Submitted By: Public Works
Prepared By: Niki Beach, Environmental Programs Analyst Subject:
..titl e
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AWARDING A “PIGGYBACK” CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO G2 CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF
STORM DRAIN TRASH CAPTURE DEVICES FOR THE EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR RUNOFF TREATMENT PROJECT, CIP PROJECT NO. 26802, AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT, AUTHORIZING A RELATED APPROPRIATION
AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ..body
Fiscal Impact:
The total estimated project cost is $415,500, consisting of $410,000 in contracted services and an additional $5,500 for nominal internal project management staff time, which is funded from within Clean Ocean Improvements Fund, Account No. 057-543-43690-000-26802.
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program awarded the City an Environmental Cleanup Program Tier 1 Grant for this project in October 2024, which will partially fund the installation of this project in the amount of $328,000.
OCTA will fund this project consistent with the grant guidelines requiring an 80/20 split in construction costs.
There is no additional budgeted appropriation being requested at this time to fund the City’s share of this project. The City’s local match for the remaining portion of $87,500 will be funded through budget transfers within the Clean Ocean Fund.
Summary:
Before the City Council is the award of a construction contract to G2 Construction, Inc. in the amount of $410,000 for installation of trash capture devices in 74 City-owned storm drains along the vicinity of El Camino Real, which is the fourth phase of an ongoing effort to retrofit catch basins in order to improve ocean water quality.
The City is required by the California State Water Resources Control Board to install a total of 559 catch basin inserts that capture litter and trash greater than 5 mm in size throughout hightraffic areas, such as multifamily developments and commercial areas, by 2030. A total of 242 catch basin inserts have been installed in recent years through the previous three phases of the catch basin insert program, as shown below.
468
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11H.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2
Full-capture Connector Pipe Screen
(CPS)
Full-capture Grate Inlet Trash Screen
(GITS)
Automatic Retractable Screen (ARS)
Background:
The California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) currently has a requirement for cities to install trash capture devices that remove litter and trash down to 5mm in size, to prevent this debris from reaching receiving waters such as rivers, creeks and the Pacific Ocean. Cities with municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) have until the end of 2030 to retrofit catch basins that drain commercial, industrial and high-density residential land uses, also known as priority land use areas, to comply with the regulation, commonly known as the Trash Amendments to the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit. Attachment 1 provides a map of these Priority Land Use Areas.
In May 2010, the OCTA Board of Directors approved the Environmental Cleanup Allocation Program to make funds available through the Environmental Cleanup Program (ECP) to help protect Orange County beaches and waterways from transportation-generated pollution in stormwater and urban runoff and improve overall water quality. The OCTA Board of Directors approved a two-tier grant approach to the Environmental Cleanup Allocation Program; Tier 1 469
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11H.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 3
funding is focused on small localized projects, while Tier 2 funding consists of regional, potentially multi-jurisdictional capital-intensive projects. The Measure M2 Project X ECP establishes a competitive process for projects that improve water quality in Orange County from transportationgenerated pollution. The funds are designed to supplement existing transportation-related water quality programs. Because of the competitive nature of the application process, not all cities submitting applications will be guaranteed grant funding.
Tier 1 of the ECP is designed to mitigate the more visible form of pollutants such as litter and debris that collects on roadways and in storm drains prior to being deposited in waterways and the ocean. The grant program can fund equipment purchases and upgrades to existing catch basins and related best management practices (BMPs) such as screens, filters, inserts and other street-scale low-flow diversion projects. Tier 1 grants are especially beneficial because of the low 20% required local funding match.
The City was awarded a $328,000 M2 Project X ECP Tier 1 Grant (Grant) from OCTA in October 2024. This project will entail retrofitting 74 City storm drain catch basins along the El Camino Real corridor. This project will retrofit 13% of the required 559 storm drains. See Attachment 2 for a Project Location Map showing the 74 catch basins proposed for retrofit.
Depending on the characteristics of each catch basin in the project, one of two types of trash capture devices, Grate Inlet Screens (GITS) or Connector Pipe Screens (CPS), are proposed to meet the requirement to fully capture debris down to 5mm in size, inclusive of material as small as a cigarette butt. Each CPS would be installed inside the catch basin vault at its outlet, and a Vactor truck would be utilized to regularly remove this debris from the catch basin. Each CPS device also has an overflow component so that during extreme rain events, the stormwater can overtop the CPS device and flow from the vault to prevent street flooding (see above photos).
In addition, Automatic Retractable Screens (ARS) would be installed at the opening of each catch basin where feasible to trap larger debris such as cups, straws and other litter before they can enter the catch basin vault, in conjunction with full capture screens in several catch basins where they would improve functionality and reduce maintenance burdens (see above photo). Street sweepers can collect this captured debris during routine street sweeping processes.
The grant guidelines allow for use of pre-qualified contractors and devices. Orange County Public Works (County) partnered with OCTA on a strategy to secure volume discounts for the purchase and installation of trash and debris control devices that would fulfill the requirements of the grant program and meet the SWRCB’s full capture equivalency of capturing debris down to 5 mm in size. The County pre-qualified six contractors, including G2, through a formal bid process to purchase and install specific trash control devices (Attachment 3).
The OCTA M2 Project X ECP Grant Guidelines require that the devices proposed in the grant applications must be the product installed for projects awarded funding. City staff reviewed devices from the six approved contractors listed in Attachment 3 and determined that the three products proposed by G2 Construction for installation in San Clemente catch basins had the appropriate specifications for the catch basins proposed for retrofit, were of excellent quality material and design, and were comparable in price to other contractor devices. Thus, City staff 470
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11H.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 4
included three types of G2 Construction devices in the City’s grant application. See Attachment 4 for a copy of the contract between the County and G2 Construction.
Staff recommends entering into a contract with G2 Construction (Attachment 5) “piggybacking” off of the existing contract between the County and G2 Construction. “Piggybacking” or cooperative purchase agreement are an exception to competitive bidding requirements and authorized under the California Public Contract Code and by Section XI(A)(1.4) of City Procurement Policy and Procedure No. 201-2-1.
The City was awarded $328,000 from OCTA in grant funding and will be required to provide the required 20% match amount of $82,000. The City will also be required to contract for the same specifications (Attachment 6) provided in the original grant application, which are also referenced in the prospective contract with G2 Construction. City Council approved the submittal of the grant application (https://www.san-clemente.org/home/showpublisheddocument/83017) and the expenditure of the required match via Resolution No. 24-71 at its May 7, 2024 meeting (Attachment 7).
Total construction project costs, including overhead and staff costs, are estimated as shown in Table 2 Below. Overhead is anticipated to be minimal due to environmental programs staff managing trash capture device programs as part of their regular duties, and due to familiarity with the G2 team and their previous work on similar City projects.
Table 2. Construction Project Costs
Construction Management and Inspection $ 5,500
Construction $410,000
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 415,500
Council Options:
Adopt Resolution No. 25-67, awarding a “piggyback” construction contract to G2 Construction, Inc., authorizing the City Manager to execute a Construction Contract in an amount not to exceed $410,000 for the El Camino Real Corridor Runoff Treatment Project, CIP Project No. 26802, and finding the project categorically exempt from CEQA under Class 1 (Existing Facilities, 14 CCR Section 15301) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Modify and Adopt Resolution No. 25-67.
Continue the item and direct staff to provide additional information. Do not award the contract or install the trash capture devices and forgo the associated grant funding.
Environmental Review/Analysis:
The recommended action and subject project is categorically exempt from CEQA under Class 1 (Existing Facilities, 14 CCR Section 15301) of the State CEQA Guidelines, and consists of repair of existing public facilities involving no expansion of an existing use. 471
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11H.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 5
Recommended Actions:
..recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 25-67, which will:
1. Authorize an appropriation of $328,000 from an OCTA Environmental Cleanup Program Grant to Account No. 057-543-43690-000-26802;
2. Find the El Camino Real Corridor Runoff Treatment Project, CIP Project No. 26802, categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 1 (Existing facilities, 14 CCR Section 15301) of the State CEQA Guidelines;
3. Authorize an exemption to competitive bidding requirements for and award the El Camino Real Corridor Runoff Treatment Project, CIP Project No. 26802, contract to G2 Construction, Inc. as a cooperative purchase; and,
4. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with G2 Construction, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $410,000, in a form substantially similar to Contract No. C25-27 (Attachment 5) for the El Camino Real Corridor Runoff Treatment Project, CIP Project No. 26802. ..end
Attachment:
1. City Map of Priority Land Use Areas
2. San Clemente OCTA Grant Project Map
3. Orange County Public Works Contract Award Letter to G2 Construction
4. Orange County Public Works Contract with G2 Construction, Inc. for Trash and Debris Capture Devices
5. City of San Clemente Contract with G2 Construction, Inc.
6. Project Bid and Specifications
7. City Council Resolution No. 24-71
8. Resolution No. 25-67
Notification:
G2 Construction, Inc.
472
Legend
Vortex Drainage Area
San Clemente Priority Land Use
Commercial
High-Density Residential
Industrial
Non-PLU
ATTACHMENT 1
473
City of San Clemente
Project Location Map
El Camino Real Corridor Runoff Treatment Project
With Storm Water Drainage Areas
Attachment 2
474
Public Works
Integrity, Accountability, Service, Trust
Shane L. Silsby, Director
January 26, 2015
Sent via Email to: [email protected]
Eric Taylor
G2 Construction, Inc.
13331 Garden Grove Blvd., Suite K
Garden Grove, CA 92843
Subject: Request for Proposals (RFP) 080-P08019: Trash and Debris Capture Devices Dear Mr. Taylor,
Attachment 3
Thank you for responding to RFP 080-P08019: Trash and Debris Capture Devices. Based upon the County of Orange's criteria and award procedures set forth in the Request for Proposals, the Evaluation Committee is recommending the award of multiple Contracts to the following vendors:
1. G2 Construction, Inc.
2. Coanda Inc.
3. United Storm Water, Inc.
4. Revel Environmental Manufacturing, Inc.
5. TRC Solutions, Inc.
6. M3 Environmental, Inc.
The Contract will be put in place by the Orange County Public Works Department. As a term of the contract, municipalities participating in the Orange County Transportation Authority's Measure M2 program will be required to review the contract terms and conditions and prepare subordinate contracts as appropriate to their local policies. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at [email protected], 714.667.9635, or by facsimile 714.834.4569.
Sin'7re!y,
1 �r �
PA
OC Public W arks
Procurement Services
P08019
300 N. Flower Street, Santa Ana, CA 92703
P.O. Box 4048, Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048
www.ocpublicworks.com
714.667.8800 I [email protected]
47513
Attachment 4
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
DocuSign Envelope ID: D5C598B6-4AF4-4B3C-8743-1D974A17C101 County of Orange, OC Public Works
G2 Construction, Inc.
MA-080-20011478
AMENDMENT No.l
FOR
TRASH AND DEBRIS CAPTURE DEVICES
This AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of the date fully executed by and between the County of Orange, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”) and G2 Construction, Inc., with a place of business at 1352 E. Boarchard Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92705 (“Contractor”), with County and Contractor sometimes individually referred to as “Party” or collectively referred to as “Parties”.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, County and Contractor entered into Contract MA-080-20011478 for Trash and Debris Capture Devices, effective June 3, 2020 through June 2, 2025 ( “Contract”); and, WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Pricing Clause of the Contract effective October 5, 2021; and,
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT ARTICLES
1. Attachment B, Section B, shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
PRICING
Product 1 of 3
CPS-Mod patented Modular Design
Offered With or Without Installation
Water Board Certified Full Trash Capture System
Orange County Volume Discounts
1-2 3-5 6-20
Devices
21-100
Devices
101-500
Devices
501+
Devices PRODUCT SIZES Unit Devices Devices
Device &
Install Up to 6.0 SOFT of stainless steel $2,359 $2,120 $1,680 $1,284 $1,241 $1,199 screen & deflector, if needed. 18"
CB discharge pipe max. Device Only $1,623 $1,499 $1,154 $899 $874 $849 Device &
Install Up to 9.0 SOFT of stainless steel $2,910 $2,472 $1,916 $1,524 $1,408 $1,362 screen & deflector, if needed. 24"
CB discharge pipe max. Device Only $2,226 $1,884 $1,413 $1,142 $1,056 $1,028 Device &
Install Up to 11.0 SOFT of stainless $3,324 $2,822 $2,180 $1,718 $1,636 $1,554 steel screen & deflector, if needed.
30" CB discharge pipe max. Device Only $2,680 $2,268 $1,701 $1,375 $1,306 $1,237 CPS-Mod Mini* - Up to 4.5 SOFT
screen. ’Customer to verify FCS
Device &
Install $1,887 $1,696 $1,344 $1,027 $993 $960
Larger & Custom devices are custom priced.
Price shown per Device. Shipping costs and taxes on non-installed devices are additional.Bond costs additional.
Combo-Discount ($50) when new CPS-Mod and ARS-CL installed in same catch basin on same project.
C026659 Page 1 of 6 Rev. 10/03/2019
507
DocuSign Envelope ID: D5C598B6-4AF4-4B3C-8743-1D974A17C101 County of Orange, OC Public Works
G2 Construction, Inc.
MA-080-20011478
6-20
Units
21-100
Units
101-500
Units
501+
Units
Unit 1-2 Units 3-5 Units
PRODUCT OPTIONS Additional Cost per Unit
SOFT SS
Screen Larger Size Stainless Steel Screen $135 $113 $113 $113 $113 $113 Mosquito Abatement Deflector Deflector $320 $306 $288 $275 $261 $248 Removable System CPS-Mod $387 $367 $350 $329 $315 $298
Hemmed Top for smoother edges CPS-Mod $137 $137 $137 $103 $103 $86 Extra Bracing (eg. inbound pipes) CPS-Mod $514 $514 $450 $321 $268 $268
INSTALLATION OF PRODUCT
PROJECT BONDS (If Required) Project Cost 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% Install Travel (In Orange County) Project Loc. FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE Catch Basin (CB) Cleaning 1 CB $280 $224 $112 $56 $50 $47 Staff Gauge Painting CB $230 $184 $92 $81 $71 $69
Traffic Control during installation 6 Hours $2,613 $2,613 $2,427 $2,427 $2,427 $2,427 Training Contractor 1 Day $5,600 $5,600 $5,600 $5,600 $5,040 $4,480 Remote Support (phone or online ) 1 Hour $138 $131 $125 $118 $112 $107
FIELD SERVICES
Product Maintenance Inspections Device $280 $224 $168 $84 $56 $56 Locating CBs and inlets. CB $224 $224 $168 $84 $56 $56
CB Field Review/ measurement. CB $224 $224 $168 $84 $56 $56 Collecting Lat. / Long, of CBs CB $224 $224 $168 $84 $56 $56
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Custom Product Design Hourly $250 $168 $168 $168 $168 $168 Custom Drawings - Product Device $336 $294 $252 $252 $252 $210 Project Management Hourly $150 $150 $138 $120 $120 $120 C026659 Page 2 of 6 Rev. 10/03/2019
508
DocuSign Envelope ID: D5C598B6-4AF4-4B3C-8743-1D974A17C101 County of Orange, OC Public Works
G2 Construction, Inc.
MA-080-20011478
PRICING
Product 2 of 3
GITS Grated Inlet Trash Screen Water Board Certified Full Trash Capture System With or Without Installation Orange County Volume Discounts GITS
Models
1-2 3-5 6-20
Devices
21-100
Devices
101-500
Devices
501
Devices PRODUCT SIZES Unit Devices Devices
Device &
Install $2,909 $2,499 $2,299 $2,149 $1,999 $1,899 Rectangular Grate 24"x 24" (or less)
GITS24x24 Device
Only $2,699 $2,290 $2,090 $1,940 $1,790 $1,690
Device &
Install $3,243 $2,736 $2,536 $2,386 $2,236 $2,136 Rectangular Grate 40"x 24" (or less)
GITS40x24 Device
Only $2,969 $2,463 $2,263 $2,113 $1,963 $1,863
Device &
Install $3,061 $2,526 $2,326 $2,176 $2,026 $1,926 Round 26" Diameter Grate (or less)
GITS26R Device
Only $2,861 $2,319 $2,119 $1,969 $1,819 $1,719
Device &
Install $4,037 $3,549 $3,449 $3,349 $3,249 $3,149 Round 39" Diameter Grate (or less)
GITS39R Device
Only $3,779 $3,295 $3,195 $3,095 $2,995 $2,895
Larger and Custom GITS-Custom custom custom custom custom custom custom GITS LoPRO* - 5" Depth Design.
‘Customer to verify FCS .
Up to 30% discount on select models.
Price shown per Device. Shipping costs and taxes on non-installed devices are additional.Bond costs additional.
Product
Code
1-2 3-5 6-20
Devices
21-100
Devices
101-500
Devices
501+
Devices PRODUCT OPTIONS Unit Devices Devices
Additonal Cost per Unit
SOFT SS
Screen Vector Control Port VECT $334 $287 $239 $239 $239 $239 Inlet Steps - Custom
Design STEPS GITS $624 $535 $446 $423 $401 $379
Custom Drawings -
Product
GITS
Drawing DRAW $335 $293 $251 $251 $251 $209
FILTRATION OPTIONS
Hydrocarbon
Polypropylene Filter
(18"x24"x3")
HCPF-PIL Filter $71 $68 $58 $53 $50 $47
Others Available Deflector vanes varies vanes varies vanes vanes
INSTALLATION OF PRODUCT
Project PROJECT BONDS BONDS 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% Cost
Project Install Travel (In OC) OC FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE Loc.
Inlet Cleaning prior to
installation CB Clean 1 CB $279 $223 $112 $56 $50 $47
Traffic Control during
installation.
TC-1Day 6 Hours $2,613 $2,613 $2,427 $2,427 $2,427 $2,427 Remote Support
(phone or online )
Supportl 1 Hour $138 $131 $125 $118 $112 $107 Hr
SEE PRICING for Field Services & Professional Services on CPS-Mod Pricing Sheet C026659 Page 3 of 6 Rev. 10/03/2019
509
DocuSign Envelope ID: D5C598B6-4AF4-4B3C-8743-1D974A17C101 County of Orange, OC Public Works
G2 Construction, Inc.
MA-080-20011478
PRICING
Product 3 of 3
ARS-CL Patented CamLock Automatic Retractable Screen
With Installation
Orange County Volume Discounts
SIZE:
Catch Basin
Width (ft)
1-2 Catch
Basins
(CBs)
Unique
Screens
per CB
ARS-CL
Model
21-100 101-500 Unit 3-5 CBs 6-20 CBs 501+ CBs CBs CBs
up to 3' 1 ARS-CL-03 CB $2,121 $1,856 $1,591 $1,098 $1,054 $1,010
3.1 - 5' 1 ARS-CL-05 CB $2,433 $2,121 $1,809 $1,435 $1,363 $1,291
5.1*
- 7’ 2 ARS-CL-07 CB $3,950 $3,430 $2,911 $2,516 $2,390 $2,264
7.1 - 10* 2 ARS-CL-10 CB $4,231 $3,842 $3,242 $2,762 $2,623 $2,485
7.1 - 10' x 3 ARS-CL-10X CB $5,066 $4,592 $4,044 $3,407 $3,237 $3,066
10.1 - 14' 3 ARS-CL-14 CB $5,458 $4,678 $4,093 $3,586 $3,407 $3,228
10.1 - 14' x 4 ARS-CL-14x CB $6,514 $5,556 $4,828 $4,426 $4,204 $3,983
14.1 - 16' 4 ARS-CL-16 CB $6,655 $5,647 $5,102 $4,638 $4,407 $4,175
16.1 - 21' 5 ARS-CL-21 CB $8,067 $6,806 $6,101 $5,798 $5,508 $5,218
16.1 - 21' x 6 ARS-CL-21X CB $8,725 $7,318 $6,811 $6,473 $6,150 $5,826
21.1 - 28' 6 ARS-CL-28 CB $8,888 $7,703 $7,170 $6,814 $6,473 $6,133
21.1 - 28' x 8 ARS-CL-28x CB $10,883 $9,757 $9,082 $8,256 $7,843 $7,430
28.1 - 35' x 10 ARS-CL-35x CB $12,683 $11,557 $10,882 $10,056 $9,643 $9,230 Price shown per Catch Basin (CB). Bonds costs not included. Traffic control additional.
Note: Models with "x" indicates the CB has an extra support bolt. 21-100
Units
101-500
Units Unit 1-2 Units 3-5 Units 6-20 Units 501+ Units
PRODUCT OPTIONS Additional Cost per Unit
Bolt-In Connections (Not Welded) CB Add 15%
Fixed Screen Option CB Subtract 15%
INSTALLATION OF PRODUCT
Project CONTRACT BONDS (If Req’d) 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% Cost Project Install Travel (In OC) FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE Loc.
Traffic Control during install. 6 Hours $2,613 $2,613 $2,427 $2,427 $2,427 $2,427 Catch basin top deck repair. varies
SEE PRICING for Field Services & Professional Services on CPS-Mod Pricing Sheet C026659 Page 4 of 6 Rev. 10/03/2019
510
DocuSign Envelope ID: D5C598B6-4AF4-4B3C-8743-1D974A17C101 County of Orange, OC Public Works
G2 Construction, Inc.
MA-080-20011478
All other terms and conditions in this Contract shall remain unchanged and with full force and effect.
2. C026659 Page 5 of 6 Rev. 10/03/2019
511
DocuSign Envelope ID: D5C598B6-4AF4-4B3C-8743-1D974A17C101 County of Orange, OC Public Works
G2 Construction, Inc.
MA-080-20011478
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first above written.
G2 CONSTRUCTION, INC.*
By: By:
Print
Name:
Print
Name:
John R . Alvarado Lydia G . Alvarado
President Treasurer Title: Title:
Corporate Officer
10/6/2021
Corporate Officer
10/6/2021 Date: Date:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, a political subdivision of
the State of California
'THolvote**
'fW By:
Print
Name: Nicholas Murray
Title: Deputy Purchasing Agent
10/7/2021 Date:
* If the contracting party is a corporation, (2) two signatures are required: one (1) signature by the Chairman of the Board, the President or any Vice President; and one (1) signature by the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, the Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. The signature of one person alone is sufficient to bind a corporation, as long as he or she holds corporate offices in each of the two categories described above. For County purposes, proof of such dual office holding will be satisfied by having the individual sign the instrument twice, each time indicating his or her office that qualifies under the above described provision. In the alternative, a single corporate signature is acceptable when accompanied by a corporate resolution demonstrating the legal authority of the signator to bind the corporation.
C026659 Page 6 of 6 Rev. 10/03/2019
512
55452.01510\32977834.2
Attachment 5
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR
RUNOFF TREATMENT PROJECT
1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Contract is made and entered into this 20 day of May, 2025 by and between the City of San Clemente, a public agency of the State of California (“City”) and G2 Construction, Inc., a California corporation with its principal place of business at 1352 East Borchard Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92705 (“Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Contract.
2. RECITALS. 2.1 City. City is a public agency organized under the laws of the State of California, with power to contract for services necessary to achieve its purpose.
2.2 Contractor. Contractor desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain construction services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract. Contractor represents that it is duly licensed and experienced in providing Installation of Storm Drain Trash Capture Devices and related construction services to public clients, that it and its employees or subcontractors have all necessary licenses and permits to perform the services in the State of California, and that it is familiar with the plans of City. The following license classifications are required for this Project: California Contractor License “A.”
2.3 Project. City desires to engage Contractor to render such services for the El Camino Real Corridor Runoff Treatment Project (“Project”) as set forth in this Contract.
2.4 Project Documents & Certifications. Contractor has obtained, and delivers concurrently herewith, a performance bond, a payment bond, and all insurance documentation, as required by the Contract.
3. TERMS
3.1 Incorporation of Documents. This Contract includes and hereby incorporates in full by reference the following documents, including all exhibits, drawings, specifications and documents therein, and attachments and addenda thereto:
Services/Schedule (Exhibit “A”)
Plans and Specifications (Exhibit “B”)
Special Conditions (Exhibit “C”)
Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation (Exhibit “D”) Public Works Contractor Registration Certification (Exhibit “E”) Payment and Performance Bonds (Exhibit “F”)
Federal Requirements (Exhibit “G”)
513
55452.01510\32977834.2
2 Insurance Requirements (Exhibit “H)
Addenda
Change Orders executed by the City
2024 Edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (The Greenbook), Excluding Sections 1-8
Notice Inviting Bids, if any
Instructions to Bidders, if any
Contractor’s Quote No. 240417-SC dated April 17, 2024
OCPW / OCTA MA-080-20011478 for Trash and Debris Capture Devices
3.2 Contractor’s Basic Obligation; Scope of Work. Contractor promises and agrees, at its own cost and expense, to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately complete the Project, including all structures and facilities necessary for the Project or described in the Contract (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the “Work”), for a Total Contract Price as specified pursuant to this Contract. All Work shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with the above referenced documents, as well as the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The plans and specifications for the Work are further described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Special Conditions, if any, relating to the Work are described in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
3.2.1 Change in Scope of Work. Any change in the scope of the Work, method of performance, nature of materials or price thereof, or any other matter materially affecting the performance or nature of the Work shall not be paid for or accepted unless such change, addition or deletion is approved in writing by a valid change order executed by the City. Should Contractor request a change order due to unforeseen circumstances affecting the performance of the Work, such request shall be made within five (5) business days of the date such circumstances are discovered or shall waive its right to request a change order due to such circumstances. If the Parties cannot agree on any change in price required by such change in the Work, the City may direct the Contractor to proceed with the performance of the change on a time and materials basis.
3.2.2 Substitutions/“Or Equal”. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 3400(b), the City may make a finding that designates certain products, things, or services by specific brand or trade name. Unless specifically designated in this Contract, whenever any material, process, or article is indicated or specified by grade, patent, or proprietary name or by name of manufacturer, such Specifications shall be deemed to be used for the purpose of facilitating the description of the material, process or article desired and shall be deemed to be followed by the words “or equal.”
Contractor may, unless otherwise stated, offer for substitution any material, process or article which shall be substantially equal or better in every respect to that so indicated or specified in this Contract. However, the City may have adopted certain uniform standards for certain materials, processes and articles. Contractor shall submit requests, together with substantiating data, for substitution of any “or equal” material, process or article no later than thirty-five (35) days after award of the Contract. To facilitate the construction schedule and sequencing, some requests may need to be submitted before thirty-five (35) days after award of Contract. Provisions regarding submission of “or equal” requests shall not in any way authorize an extension of time for performance of this Contract. If a proposed “or equal” substitution request 514
55452.01510\32977834.2
3 is rejected, Contractor shall be responsible for providing the specified material, process or article.
The burden of proof as to the equality of any material, process or article shall rest with Contractor.
The City has the complete and sole discretion to determine if a material, process or article is an “or equal” material, process or article that may be substituted. Data required to substantiate requests for substitutions of an “or equal” material, process or article data shall include a signed affidavit from Contractor stating that, and describing how, the substituted “or equal” material, process or article is equivalent to that specified in every way except as listed on the affidavit. Substantiating data shall include any and all illustrations, specifications, and other relevant data including catalog information which describes the requested substituted “or equal” material, process or article, and substantiates that it is an “or equal” to the material, process or article. The substantiating data must also include information regarding the durability and lifecycle cost of the requested substituted “or equal” material, process or article. Failure to submit all the required substantiating data, including the signed affidavit, to the City in a timely fashion will result in the rejection of the proposed substitution.
Contractor shall bear all of the City’s costs associated with the review of substitution requests. Contractor shall be responsible for all costs related to a substituted “or equal” material, process or article. Contractor is directed to the Special Conditions (if any) to review any findings made pursuant to Public Contract Code section 3400.
3.3 Period of Performance.
3.3.1 Contract Time. Contractor shall perform and complete all Work under this Contract within 120 WORKING DAYS, beginning the effective date of the Notice to Proceed (“Contract Time”). Contractor shall perform its Work in strict accordance with any completion schedule, construction schedule or project milestones developed by the City. Such schedules or milestones may be included as part of Exhibits “A” or “B” attached hereto, or may be provided separately in writing to Contractor. Contractor agrees that if such Work is not completed within the aforementioned Contract Time and/or pursuant to any such completion schedule, construction schedule or project milestones developed pursuant to provisions of the Contract, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that the City will suffer damage.
3.3.2 Force Majeure. Neither City nor Contractor shall be considered in default of this Contract for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing party. For purposes of this Contract, such circumstances include but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; pandemics or epidemics; war; riots and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage or judicial restraint. Should such circumstances occur, the nonperforming party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Contract. Contractor’s exclusive remedy in the event of delay covered under this section shall be a non-compensable extension of the Contract Time.
3.3.3 Liquidated Damages. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor shall pay to the City as fixed and liquidated damages the sum of Eight Hundred Dollars ($800) per day for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the Contract Time or beyond 515
55452.01510\32977834.2
4 any completion schedule, construction schedule or Project milestones established pursuant to the Contract.
3.4 Standard of Performance; Performance of Employees. Contractor shall perform all Work under this Contract in a skillful and workmanlike manner, and consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Contractor represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Work. Contractor warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Work assigned to them. Finally, Contractor represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Work, including any required business license, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Contract. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Contract, Contractor shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any work necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by Contractor’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the safety of persons or the Work, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Work in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by Contractor and shall not be re-employed on the Work.
3.5 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Contractual Relationship. City retains Contractor on an independent contractor basis and Contractor is not an employee of City. Any additional personnel performing the work governed by this Contract on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Contractor shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance under this Contract and as required by law. Contractor shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.
3.6 City’s Basic Obligation. City agrees to engage and does hereby engage Contractor as an independent contractor to furnish all materials and to perform all Work according to the terms and conditions herein contained for the sum set forth above. Except as otherwise provided in the Contract, the City shall pay to Contractor, as full consideration for the satisfactory performance by Contractor of the services and obligations required by this Contract, the belowreferenced compensation in accordance with compensation provisions set forth in the Contract.
3.7 Compensation and Payment.
3.7.1 Amount of Compensation. As consideration for performance of the Work required herein, including all labor, materials and equipment reasonably related thereto, the City agrees to pay Contractor according to the pricing set forth in the master purchase agreement with OCPW / OCTA MA-080-20011478 for Trash and Debris Capture Devices, which is fully incorporated herein by this reference, and the total compensation shall not to exceed Four Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($410,000.00) (“Total Contract Price”), provided that such amount shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to the applicable terms of this Contract or written change orders approved and signed in advance by the City.
3.7.2 Payment of Compensation. If the Work is scheduled for completion in thirty (30) or less calendar days, City will arrange for payment of the Total Contract Price upon 516
55452.01510\32977834.2
5 completion and approval by City of the Work. If the Work is scheduled for completion in more than thirty (30) calendar days, City will pay Contractor on a monthly basis as provided for herein.
On or before the fifth (5th) day of each month, Contractor shall submit to the City an itemized application for payment in the format supplied by the City indicating the amount of Work completed since commencement of the Work or since the last progress payment. These applications shall be supported by evidence which is required by this Contract and such other documentation as the City may require. The Contractor shall certify that the Work for which payment is requested has been done and that the materials listed are stored where indicated. Contractor may be required to furnish a detailed schedule of values upon request of the City and in such detail and form as the City shall request, showing the quantities, unit prices, overhead, profit, and all other expenses involved in order to provide a basis for determining the amount of progress payments.
3.7.3 Prompt Payment. City shall review and pay all progress payment requests in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 20104.50 of the California Public Contract Code. However, no progress payments will be made for Work not completed in accordance with this Contract. Contractor shall comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to the proper payment of its employees, subcontractors, suppliers or others.
3.7.4 Contract Retentions. From each approved progress estimate, five percent (5%) will be deducted and retained by the City, and the remainder will be paid to Contractor. All Contract retention shall be released and paid to Contractor and subcontractors pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 7107.
3.7.5 Other Retentions. In addition to Contract retentions, the City may deduct from each progress payment an amount necessary to protect City from loss because of: (1) liquidated damages which have accrued as of the date of the application for payment; (2) any sums expended by the City in performing any of Contractor’s obligations under the Contract which Contractor has failed to perform or has performed inadequately; (3) defective Work not remedied; (4) stop notices as allowed by state law; (5) reasonable doubt that the Work can be completed for the unpaid balance of the Total Contract Price or within the scheduled completion date; (6) unsatisfactory prosecution of the Work by Contractor; (7) unauthorized deviations from the Contract; (8) failure of Contractor to maintain or submit on a timely basis proper and sufficient documentation as required by the Contract or by City during the prosecution of the Work; (9) erroneous or false estimates by Contractor of the value of the Work performed; (10) any sums representing expenses, losses, or damages as determined by the City, incurred by the City for which Contractor is liable under the Contract; and (11) any other sums which the City is entitled to recover from Contractor under the terms of the Contract or pursuant to state law, including Section 1727 of the California Labor Code. The failure by the City to deduct any of these sums from a progress payment shall not constitute a waiver of the City’s right to such sums.
3.7.6 Substitutions for Contract Retentions. In accordance with California Public Contract Code Section 22300, the City will permit the substitution of securities for any monies withheld by the City to ensure performance under the Contract. At the request and expense of Contractor, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the City, or with a state or federally chartered bank in California as the escrow agent, and thereafter the City shall then pay such monies to Contractor as they come due. Upon satisfactory completion of the Contract, the securities shall be returned to Contractor. For purposes of this Section and Section 22300 of the Public Contract Code, the term “satisfactory completion of the contract” shall mean the time the City has issued written final acceptance of the Work and filed a Notice of Completion 517
55452.01510\32977834.2
6 as required by law and provisions of this Contract. Contractor shall be the beneficial owner of any securities substituted for monies withheld and shall receive any interest thereon. The escrow agreement used for the purposes of this Section shall be in the form provided by the City.
3.7.7 Title to Work. As security for partial, progress, or other payments, title to Work for which such payments are made shall pass to the City at the time of payment. To the extent that title has not previously been vested in the City by reason of payments, full title shall pass to the City at delivery of the Work at the destination and time specified in this Contract. Such transferred title shall in each case be good, free and clear from any and all security interests, liens, or other encumbrances. Contractor promises and agrees that it will not pledge, hypothecate, or otherwise encumber the items in any manner that would result in any lien, security interest, charge, or claim upon or against said items. Such transfer of title shall not imply acceptance by the City, nor relieve Contractor from the responsibility to strictly comply with the Contract, and shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility for any loss of or damage to items.
3.7.8 Labor and Material Releases. Contractor shall furnish City with labor and material releases from all subcontractors performing work on, or furnishing materials for, the Work governed by this Contract prior to final payment by City.
3.7.9 Prevailing Wages. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. Since the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Contract upon request. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at Contractor’s principal place of business and at the project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. Contractor and any subcontractor shall forfeit a penalty of up to $200 per calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the prevailing wage rates.
3.7.10 Apprenticeable Crafts. When Contractor employs workmen in an apprenticeable craft or trade, Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the California Labor Code with respect to the employment of properly registered apprentices upon public works. The primary responsibility for compliance with said section for all apprenticeable occupations shall be with Contractor. The Contractor or any subcontractor that is determined by the Labor Commissioner to have knowingly violated Section 1777.5 shall forfeit as a civil penalty an amount not exceeding $100 for each full calendar day of noncompliance, or such greater amount as provided by law.
3.7.11 Hours of Work. Contractor is advised that eight (8) hours labor constitutes a legal day’s work. Pursuant to Section 1813 of the California Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit a penalty of $25.00 per worker for each day that each worker is permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week, except when 518
55452.01510\32977834.2
7 payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one-half (1-1/2) times the basic rate for that worker.
3.7.12 Payroll Records. Contractor and each subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record, showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by him or her in connection with the public work. The payroll records shall be certified and shall be available for inspection at all reasonable hours at the principal office of Contractor in the manner provided in Labor Code section 1776. In the event of noncompliance with the requirements of this section, Contractor shall have 10 days in which to comply subsequent to receipt of written notice specifying in what respects such Contractor must comply with this section. Should noncompliance still be evident after such 10-day period, Contractor shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit not more than $100.00 for each calendar day or portion thereof, for each worker, until strict compliance is effectuated. The amount of the forfeiture is to be determined by the Labor Commissioner. A contractor who is found to have violated the provisions of law regarding wages on Public Works with the intent to defraud shall be ineligible to bid on Public Works contracts for a period of one to three years as determined by the Labor Commissioner. Upon the request of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, such penalties shall be withheld from progress payments then due. The responsibility for compliance with this section is on Contractor.
The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4.
3.7.13 Contractor and Subcontractor Registration. Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, all contractors and subcontractors that wish to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or enter into a contract to perform public work must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. No bid will be accepted nor any contract entered into without proof of the contractor’s and subcontractors’ current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work. Contractor is directed to review, fill out and execute the Public Works Contractor Registration Certification attached hereto as Exhibit “E” prior to contract execution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1.
3.7.14 Labor Compliance; Stop Orders. This Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be the Contractor’s sole responsibility to evaluate and pay the cost of complying with all labor compliance requirements under this Contract and applicable law. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Contractor or any subcontractor that affect Contractor’s performance of Work, including any delay, shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Contractor caused delay subject to any applicable liquidated damages and shall not be compensable by the City.
Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Contractor or any subcontractor.
3.8 Performance of Work; Jobsite Obligations.
519
55452.01510\32977834.2
8 3.8.1 Water Quality Management and Compliance.
3.8.1.1 Water Quality Management and Compliance. Contractor shall keep itself and all subcontractors, staff, and employees fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations that may impact, or be implicated by the performance of the Work including, without limitation, all applicable provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. §§ 1300); the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Cal Water Code §§ 13000-14950); local ordinances regulating discharges of storm water; and any and all regulations, policies, or permits issued pursuant to any such authority regulating the discharge of pollutants, as that term is used in the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, to any ground or surface water in the State.
3.8.1.2 Compliance with the Statewide Construction General Permit. Contractor shall comply with all conditions of the most recent iteration of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity, issued by the California State Water Resources Control Board (“Permit”). It shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility to file a Notice of Intent and procure coverage under the Permit for all construction activity which results in the disturbance of more than one acre of total land area or which is part of a larger common area of development or sale. Prior to initiating work, Contractor shall be solely responsible for preparing and implementing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required by the Permit. Contractor shall be responsible for procuring, implementing and complying with the provisions of the Permit and the SWPPP, including the standard provisions, and monitoring and reporting requirements as required by the Permit. The Permit requires the SWPPP to be a “living document” that changes as necessary to meet the conditions and requirements of the job site as it progresses through difference phases of construction and is subject to different weather conditions. It shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility to update the SWPPP as necessary to address conditions at the project site.
3.8.1.3 Other Water Quality Rules Regulations and Policies.
Contractor shall comply with the lawful requirements of any applicable municipality, drainage City, or local agency regarding discharges of storm water to separate storm drain systems or other watercourses under their jurisdiction, including applicable requirements in municipal storm water management programs.
3.8.1.4 Cost of Compliance. Storm, surface, nuisance, or other waters may be encountered at various times during construction of The Work. Therefore, the Contractor, by submitting a Bid, hereby acknowledges that it has investigated the risk arising from such waters, has prepared its Bid accordingly, and assumes any and all risks and liabilities arising therefrom.
3.8.1.5 Liability for Non-Compliance. Failure to comply with the Permit is a violation of federal and state law. Pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Contract, Contractor hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents for any alleged violations. In addition, City may seek damages from Contractor for any delay in completing the Work in accordance with the Contract, if such delay is caused by or related to Contractor’s failure to comply with the Permit. 520
55452.01510\32977834.2
9 3.8.1.6 Reservation of Right to Defend. City reserves the right to defend any enforcement action brought against the City for Contractor’s failure to comply with the Permit or any other relevant water quality law, regulation, or policy. Pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Contract, Contractor hereby agrees to be bound by, and to reimburse the City for the costs (including the City’s attorney’s fees) associated with, any settlement reached between the City and the relevant enforcement entity.
3.8.1.7 Training. In addition to the standard of performance requirements set forth in paragraph 3.4, Contractor warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Work assigned to them without impacting water quality in violation of the laws, regulations and policies described in paragraph 3.8.1. Contractor further warrants that it, its employees and subcontractors will receive adequate training, as determined by City, regarding the requirements of the laws, regulations and policies described in paragraph 3.8.1 as they may relate to the Work provided under this Agreement. Upon request, City will provide the Contractor with a list of training programs that meet the requirements of this paragraph.
3.8.2 Safety. Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the specifications relating to safety measures applicable in particular operations or kinds of work. In carrying out its Work, Contractor shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the Work and the conditions under which the Work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to, adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment; adequate illumination for underground and night operations; instructions in accident prevention for all employees, such as machinery guards, safe walkways, scaffolds, ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, fall protection and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. Furthermore, Contractor shall prominently display the names and telephone numbers of at least two medical doctors practicing in the vicinity of the Project, as well as the telephone number of the local ambulance service, adjacent to all telephones at the Project site.
3.8.3 Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Contract or the Work, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Contractor shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Work. If Contractor observes that the drawings or specifications are at variance with any law, rule or regulation, it shall promptly notify the City in writing. Any necessary changes shall be made by written change order. If Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. City is a public entity of the State of California subject to certain provisions of the Health & Safety Code, Government Code, Public Contract Code, and Labor Code of the State. It is stipulated and agreed that all provisions of the law applicable to the public contracts of a municipality are a part of this Contract to the same extent as though set forth herein and will be complied with. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the 521
55452.01510\32977834.2
10 indemnification provisions of this Contract, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.
3.8.4 Permits and Licenses. Contractor shall be responsible for securing City permits and licenses necessary to perform the Work described herein, including, but not limited to, any required business license. While Contractor will not be charged a fee for any City permits, Contractor shall pay the City’s business license fee, if any. Any ineligible contractor or subcontractor pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1777.1 and 1777.7 may not perform work on this Project.
3.8.5 Trenching Work. If the Total Contract Price exceeds $25,000 and if the Work governed by this Contract entails excavation of any trench or trenches five (5) feet or more in depth, Contractor shall comply with all applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, including Section 6705. To this end, Contractor shall submit for City’s review and approval a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during the excavation of such trench or trenches. If such plan varies from the shoring system standards, the plan shall be prepared by a registered civil or structural engineer.
3.8.6 Hazardous Materials and Differing Conditions. As required by California Public Contract Code Section 7104, if this Contract involves digging trenches or other excavations that extend deeper than four (4) feet below the surface, Contractor shall promptly, and prior to disturbance of any conditions, notify City of: (1) any material discovered in excavation that Contractor believes to be a hazardous waste that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II or Class III disposal site; (2) subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated by City; and (3) unknown physical conditions of an unusual nature at the site, significantly different from those ordinarily encountered in such contract work. Upon notification, City shall promptly investigate the conditions to determine whether a change order is appropriate.
In the event of a dispute, Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date and shall proceed with all Work to be performed under the Contract, but shall retain all rights provided by the Contract or by law for making protests and resolving the dispute.
3.8.7 Underground Utility Facilities. To the extent required by Section 4215 of the California Government Code, City shall compensate Contractor for the costs of: (1) locating and repairing damage to underground utility facilities not caused by the failure of Contractor to exercise reasonable care; (2) removing or relocating underground utility facilities not indicated in the construction drawings; and (3) equipment necessarily idled during such work. Contractor shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay caused by failure of City to provide for removal or relocation of such utility facilities.
3.8.8 Air Quality. Contractor must fully comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in furnishing or using equipment and/or providing services, including, but not limited to, emissions limits and permitting requirements imposed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Although CARB limits and requirements are more broad, Contractor shall specifically be aware of their application to "portable equipment", which definition is considered by CARB to include any item of equipment with a fuel-powered engine. Contractor shall indemnify City against any fines or penalties imposed by CARB, or any other governmental or regulatory agency for violations of applicable laws, rules and/or regulations by Contractor, its subcontractors, or others for whom Contractor is responsible under its indemnity obligations provided for in this Agreement. 522
55452.01510\32977834.2
11 3.8.9 State Recycling Mandates. Contractor shall comply with State Recycling Mandates. Any recyclable materials/debris collected by the contractor that can be feasibly diverted via reuse or recycling must be hauled by the appropriate handler for reuse or recycling.
3.9 Completion of Work. When Contractor determines that it has completed the Work required herein, Contractor shall so notify City in writing and shall furnish all labor and material releases required by this Contract. City shall thereupon inspect the Work. If the Work is not acceptable to the City, the City shall indicate to Contractor in writing the specific portions or items of Work which are unsatisfactory or incomplete. Once Contractor determines that it has completed the incomplete or unsatisfactory Work, Contractor may request a reinspection by the City. Once the Work is acceptable to City, City shall pay to Contractor the Total Contract Price remaining to be paid, less any amount which City may be authorized or directed by law to retain.
Payment of retention proceeds due to Contractor shall be made in accordance with Section 7107 of the California Public Contract Code.
3.10 Claims; Government Code Claim Compliance.
3.10.1 Intent. Effective January 1, 1991, Section 20104 et seq., of the California Public Contract Code prescribes a process utilizing informal conferences, non-binding judicial supervised mediation, and judicial arbitration to resolve disputes on construction claims of $375,000 or less. Effective January 1, 2017, Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code prescribes a process for negotiation and mediation to resolve disputes on construction claims. The intent of this Section is to implement Sections 20104 et seq. and Section 9204 of the California Public Contract Code. This Section shall be construed to be consistent with said statutes.
3.10.2 Claims. For purposes of this Section, “Claim” means a separate demand by the Contractor, after a change order duly requested in accordance with the terms of this Contract has been denied by the City, for (A) a time extension, (B) payment of money or damages arising from Work done by or on behalf of the Contractor pursuant to the Contract, or (C) an amount the payment of which is disputed by the City. A “Claim” does not include any demand for payment for which the Contractor has failed to provide notice, request a change order, or otherwise failed to follow any procedures contained in the Contract Documents. Claims governed by this Section may not be filed unless and until the Contractor completes all procedures for giving notice of delay or change and for the requesting of a time extension or change order, including but not necessarily limited to the change order procedures contained herein, and Contractor’s request for a change has been denied in whole or in part. Claims governed by this Section must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after a request for change has been denied in whole or in part or after any other event giving rise to the Claim. The Claim shall be submitted in writing to the City and shall include on its first page the following in 16 point capital font: “THIS IS A CLAIM.” Furthermore, the claim shall include the documents necessary to substantiate the claim. Nothing in this Section is intended to extend the time limit or supersede notice requirements otherwise provided by contract for the filing of claims, including all requirements pertaining to compensation or payment for extra Work, disputed Work, and/or changed conditions. Failure to follow such contractual requirements shall bar any claims or subsequent lawsuits for compensation or payment thereon.
3.10.3 Supporting Documentation. The Contractor shall submit all claims in the following format:
523
55452.01510\32977834.2
12 3.10.3.1 Summary of claim merit and price, reference Contract Document provisions pursuant to which the claim is made
3.10.3.2 List of documents relating to claim:
(A) Specifications
(B) Drawings
(C) Clarifications (Requests for Information)
(D) Schedules
(E) Other
3.10.3.3 Chronology of events and correspondence
3.10.3.4 Analysis of claim merit
3.10.3.5 Analysis of claim cost
3.10.3.6 Time impact analysis in CPM format
3.10.3.7 If Contractor’s claim is based in whole or in part on an allegation of errors or omissions in the Drawings or Specifications for the Project, Contractor shall provide a summary of the percentage of the claim subject to design errors or omissions and shall obtain a certificate of merit in support of the claim of design errors and omissions.
3.10.3.8 Cover letter and certification of validity of the claim, including any claims from subcontractors of any tier, in accordance with Government Code section 12650 et seq. 3.10.4 City’s Response. Upon receipt of a claim pursuant to this Section, City shall conduct a reasonable review of the claim and, within a period not to exceed 45 days, shall provide the Contractor a written statement identifying what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim will be processed and made within 60 days after the public entity issues its written statement.
3.10.4.1 If City needs approval from its governing body to provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion of the claim, and the governing body does not meet within the 45 days or within the mutually agreed to extension of time following receipt of a claim sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, City shall have up to three days following the next duly publicly noticed meeting of the governing body after the 45-day period, or extension, expires to provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion.
3.10.4.2 Within 30 days of receipt of a claim, City may request in writing additional documentation supporting the claim or relating to defenses or claims City may have against the Contractor. If additional information is thereafter required, it shall be requested and provided pursuant to this subdivision, upon mutual agreement of City and the Contractor. 524
55452.01510\32977834.2
13 3.10.4.3 City’s written response to the claim, as further documented, shall be submitted to the Contractor within 30 days (if the claim is less than $50,000, within 15 days) after receipt of the further documentation, or within a period of time no greater than that taken by the Contractor in producing the additional information or requested documentation, whichever is greater.
3.10.5 Meet and Confer. If the Contractor disputes City’s written response, or City fails to respond within the time prescribed, the Contractor may so notify City, in writing, either within 15 days of receipt of City’s response or within 15 days of City’s failure to respond within the time prescribed, respectively, and demand an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. Upon receipt of a demand, City shall schedule a meet and confer conference within 30 days for settlement of the dispute.
3.10.6 Mediation. Within 10 business days following the conclusion of the meet and confer conference, if the claim or any portion of the claim remains in dispute, City shall provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the portion of the claim that remains in dispute and the portion that is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after City issues its written statement. Any disputed portion of the claim, as identified by the Contractor in writing, shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation, with City and the Contractor sharing the associated costs equally. City and Contractor shall mutually agree to a mediator within 10 business days after the disputed portion of the claim has been identified in writing, unless the parties agree to select a mediator at a later time.
3.10.6.1 If the Parties cannot agree upon a mediator, each Party shall select a mediator and those mediators shall select a qualified neutral third party to mediate with regard to the disputed portion of the claim. Each Party shall bear the fees and costs charged by its respective mediator in connection with the selection of the neutral mediator.
3.10.6.2 For purposes of this section, mediation includes any nonbinding process, including, but not limited to, neutral evaluation or a dispute review board, in which an independent third party or board assists the Parties in dispute resolution through negotiation or by issuance of an evaluation. Any mediation utilized shall conform to the timeframes in this section.
3.10.6.3 Unless otherwise agreed to by City and the Contractor in writing, the mediation conducted pursuant to this section shall excuse any further obligation under Section 20104.4 to mediate after litigation has been commenced.
3.10.6.4 The mediation shall be held no earlier than the date the Contractor completes the Work or the date that the Contractor last performs Work, whichever is earlier. All unresolved claims shall be considered jointly in a single mediation, unless a new unrelated claim arises after mediation is completed.
3.10.7 Procedures After Mediation. If following the mediation, the claim or any portion remains in dispute, the Contractor must file a claim pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 910) of Part 3 of Division 3.6 of Title 1 of the Government Code. For purposes of those provisions, the running of the period of time within which a claim must be filed shall be tolled from the time the Contractor submits his or her 525
55452.01510\32977834.2
14 written claim pursuant to subdivision (a) until the time the claim is denied, including any period of time utilized by the meet and confer conference or mediation.
3.10.8 Civil Actions. The following procedures are established for all civil actions filed to resolve claims subject to this Section:
3.10.8.1 Within 60 days, but no earlier than 30 days, following the filing or responsive pleadings, the court shall submit the matter to non-binding mediation unless waived by mutual stipulation of both parties or unless mediation was held prior to commencement of the action in accordance with Public Contract Code section 9204 and the terms of these procedures. The mediation process shall provide for the selection within 15 days by both parties of a disinterested third person as mediator, shall be commenced within 30 days of the submittal, and shall be concluded within 15 days from the commencement of the mediation unless a time requirement is extended upon a good cause showing to the court.
3.10.8.2 If the matter remains in dispute, the case shall be submitted to judicial arbitration pursuant to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1141.10) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, notwithstanding Section 1114.11 of that code. The Civil Discovery Act of 1986 (Article 3 (commencing with Section 2016) of Chapter 3 of Title 3 of Part 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure) shall apply to any proceeding brought under this subdivision consistent with the rules pertaining to judicial arbitration.
3.10.8.3 In addition to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1141.10) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (A) arbitrators shall, when possible, be experienced in construction law, and (B) any party appealing an arbitration award who does not obtain a more favorable judgment shall, in addition to payment of costs and fees under that chapter, also pay the attorney’s fees on appeal of the other party.
3.10.9 Government Code Claims. In addition to any and all contract requirements pertaining to notices of and requests for compensation or payment for extra work, disputed work, claims and/or changed conditions, Contractor must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code sections 900 et seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the City. Such Government Code claims and any subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters that remain unresolved after all procedures pertaining to extra work, disputed work, claims, and/or changed conditions have been followed by Contractor. If no such Government Code claim is submitted, or if any prerequisite contractual requirements are not otherwise satisfied as specified herein, Contractor shall be barred from bringing and maintaining a valid lawsuit against the City. A Government Code claim must be filed no earlier than the date the work is completed or the date the Contractor last performs work on the Project, whichever occurs first. A Government Code claim shall be inclusive of all unresolved claims unless a new unrelated claim arises after the Government Code claim is submitted.
3.10.10 Non-Waiver. City’s failure to respond to a claim from the Contractor within the time periods described in this Section or to otherwise meet the time requirements of this Section shall result in the claim being deemed rejected in its entirety. City’s failure to respond shall not waive City’s rights to any subsequent procedures for the resolution of disputed claims.
3.11 Loss and Damage. Except as may otherwise be limited by law, Contractor shall be responsible for all loss and damage which may arise out of the nature of the Work agreed to 526
55452.01510\32977834.2
15 herein, or from the action of the elements, or from any unforeseen difficulties which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the Work until the same is fully completed and accepted by City. In the event of damage proximately caused by an Act of God, as defined by Section 7105 of the Public Contract Code, the City may terminate this Contract pursuant to Section 3.17.3; provided, however, that the City needs to provide Contractor with only one (1) day advanced written notice.
3.12 Indemnification.
3.12.1 Scope of Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend (with counsel reasonably approved by City), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, suits, actions, proceedings, costs, expenses, liability, judgments, awards, decrees, settlements, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, (collectively, “Claims”) in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Contractor, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Contractor’s services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, expert witness fees and attorneys’ fees and other related costs and expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782, Contractor’s indemnity obligation shall not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or any other loss, damage or expense arising from the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of the City or the City’s agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the City, or for defects in design furnished by those persons.
3.12.2 Additional Indemnity Obligations. In addition, Contractor shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Contractor shall also reimburse City for the cost of any settlement paid by City or its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Such reimbursement shall include payment for City's attorney's fees and costs, including expert witness fees. Contractor shall reimburse City and its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Contractor's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers.
3.13 Insurance. Contractor agrees to procure and maintain, at Contractor’s expense all insurance specified in Exhibit “H” attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Contractor shall require all subcontractors to carry the same policies and limits of insurance that the Contractor is required to maintain, unless otherwise approved in writing by the City.
3.14 Bond Requirements.
3.14.1 Payment Bond. If required by law or otherwise specifically requested by City in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, Contractor shall execute and provide to City concurrently with this Contract a Payment Bond in an amount required by the 527
55452.01510\32977834.2
16 City and in a form provided or approved by the City. If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until the bond has been received and approved by the City.
3.14.2 Performance Bond. If specifically requested by City in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, Contractor shall execute and provide to City concurrently with this Contract a Performance Bond in an amount required by the City and in a form provided or approved by the City. If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until the bond has been received and approved by the City.
3.14.3 Bond Provisions. Should, in City’s sole opinion, any bond become insufficient or any surety be found to be unsatisfactory, Contractor shall renew or replace the effected bond within (ten) 10 days of receiving notice from City. In the event the surety or Contractor intends to reduce or cancel any required bond, at least thirty (30) days prior written notice shall be given to the City, and Contractor shall post acceptable replacement bonds at least ten (10) days prior to expiration of the original bonds. No further payments shall be deemed due or will be made under this Contract until any replacement bonds required by this Section are accepted by the City. To the extent, if any, that the Total Contract Price is increased in accordance with the Contract, Contractor shall, upon request of the City, cause the amount of the bond to be increased accordingly and shall promptly deliver satisfactory evidence of such increase to the City. If Contractor fails to furnish any required bond, the City may terminate the Contract for cause.
3.14.4 Surety Qualifications. Only bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120, shall be accepted. If a California-admitted surety insurer issuing bonds does not meet these requirements, the insurer will be considered qualified if it is in conformance with Section 995.660 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and proof of such is provided to the City.
3.15 Warranty. Contractor warrants all Work under the Contract (which for purposes of this Section shall be deemed to include unauthorized work which has not been removed and any non-conforming materials incorporated into the Work) to be of good quality and free from any defective or faulty material and workmanship. Contractor agrees that for a period of one year (or the period of time specified elsewhere in the Contract or in any guarantee or warranty provided by any manufacturer or supplier of equipment or materials incorporated into the Work, whichever is later) after the date of final acceptance, Contractor shall within ten (10) days after being notified in writing by the City of any defect in the Work or non-conformance of the Work to the Contract, commence and prosecute with due diligence all Work necessary to fulfill the terms of the warranty at its sole cost and expense. Contractor shall act sooner as requested by the City in response to an emergency. In addition, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair and replace any portions of the Work (or work of other contractors) damaged by its defective Work or which becomes damaged in the course of repairing or replacing defective Work. For any Work so corrected, Contractor’s obligation hereunder to correct defective Work shall be reinstated for an additional one year period, commencing with the date of acceptance of such corrected Work.
Contractor shall perform such tests as the City may require to verify that any corrective actions, including, without limitation, redesign, repairs, and replacements comply with the requirements of the Contract. All costs associated with such corrective actions and testing, including the removal, replacement, and reinstitution of equipment and materials necessary to gain access, shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor. All warranties and guarantees of subcontractors, suppliers and manufacturers with respect to any portion of the Work, whether express or implied, are deemed 528
55452.01510\32977834.2
17 to be obtained by Contractor for the benefit of the City, regardless of whether or not such warranties and guarantees have been transferred or assigned to the City by separate agreement and Contractor agrees to enforce such warranties and guarantees, if necessary, on behalf of the City. In the event that Contractor fails to perform its obligations under this Section, or under any other warranty or guaranty under this Contract, to the reasonable satisfaction of the City, the City shall have the right to correct and replace any defective or non-conforming Work and any work damaged by such work or the replacement or correction thereof at Contractor’s sole expense.
Contractor shall be obligated to fully reimburse the City for any expenses incurred hereunder upon demand.
3.15.1 Warranty Bonds. At the time of completion of the project and prior to acceptance, a warranty bond in the amount of 25% of the contract price shall be required for a period of one (1) year after City recordation of Notice of Completion.
3.16 Employee/Labor Certifications.
3.16.1 Contractor’s Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Contractor certifies that he is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work. A certification form for this purpose, which is attached to this Contract as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by reference, shall be executed simultaneously with this Contract.
3.16.2 Equal Opportunity Employment. Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination.
3.16.3 Verification of Employment Eligibility. By executing this Contract, Contractor verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time, and shall require all subcontractors and sub-subcontractors to comply with the same.
3.17 General Provisions.
3.17.1 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the General Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Contract (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. Contractor shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.
3.17.2 Contractor’s Representative. Before starting the Work, Contractor shall submit in writing the name, qualifications and experience of its proposed representative who shall be subject to the review and approval of the City
approval by the City, Contractor’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on 529
55452.01510\32977834.2
18 behalf of Contractor for all purposes under this Contract. Contractor’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Work, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Work under this Contract. Contractor’s Representative shall devote full time to the Project and either he or his designee, who shall be acceptable to the City, shall be present at the Work site at all times that any Work is in progress and at any time that any employee or subcontractor of Contractor is present at the Work site. Arrangements for responsible supervision, acceptable to the City, shall be made for emergency Work which may be required. Should Contractor desire to change its Contractor’s Representative, Contractor shall provide the information specified above and obtain the City’s written approval.
3.17.3 Termination. This Contract may be terminated by City at any time, either with our without cause, by giving Contractor three (3) days advance written notice. In the event of termination by City for any reason other than the fault of Contractor, City shall pay Contractor for all Work performed up to that time as provided herein. In the event of breach of the Contract by Contractor, City may terminate the Contract immediately without notice, may reduce payment to Contractor in the amount necessary to offset City’s resulting damages, and may pursue any other available recourse against Contractor. Contractor may not terminate this Contract except for cause. In the event this Contract is terminated in whole or in part as provided, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. Further, if this Contract is terminated as provided, City may require Contractor to provide all finished or unfinished documents, data, diagrams, drawings, materials or other matter prepared or built by Contractor in connection with its performance of this Contract.
3.17.4 Contract Interpretation. Should any question arise regarding the meaning or import of any of the provisions of this Contract or written or oral instructions from City, the matter shall be referred to City’s Representative, whose decision shall be binding upon Contractor.
3.17.5 Anti-Trust Claims. This provision shall be operative if this Contract is applicable to California Public Contract Code Section 7103.5. In entering into this Contract to supply goods, services or materials, Contractor hereby offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Section 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, commencing with Section 16700, of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code) arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Contract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tender final payment to Contractor, without further acknowledgment by the Parties.
3.17.6 Notices. All notices hereunder and communications regarding interpretation of the terms of the Contract or changes thereto shall be provided by the mailing thereof by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as follows:
CONTRACTOR:
G2 Construction Inc.
1352 East Borchard Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
530
55452.01510\32977834.2
19 Attn: John R. Alvarado, President, and
Eric Taylor, Project Manager
CITY:
City of San Clemente
910 Calle Negocio
San Clemente, CA 92673
Attn: Niki Beach, Environmental Programs Analyst, and
Laura Campagnolo, City Clerk
Any notice so given shall be considered received by the other Party three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail as stated above and addressed to the Party at the above address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.
3.17.7 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Contract.
3.17.8 Assignment Forbidden. Contractor shall not, either voluntarily or by action of law, assign or transfer this Contract or any obligation, right, title or interest assumed by Contractor herein without the prior written consent of City. If Contractor attempts an assignment or transfer of this Contract or any obligation, right, title or interest herein, City may, at its option, terminate and revoke the Contract and shall thereupon be relieved from any and all obligations to Contractor or its assignee or transferee.
3.17.9 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.
3.17.10 Laws, Venue, and Attorneys’ Fees. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of Orange, State of California.
3.17.11 Counterparts/Electronic Signature. This Contract may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. This Contract may be executed electronically with the same force and effect as an original ink signature. Bonds, if required, must be signed with original ink signatures and accompanied by notary acknowledgments.
3.17.12 Successors. The Parties do for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns agree to the full performance of all of the provisions contained in this Contract.
3.17.13 [Reserved]
3.17.14 Solicitation. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Contract. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration 531
55452.01510\32977834.2
20 contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to terminate this Contract without liability.
3.17.15 Conflict of Interest. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Contract, no official, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Contract, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. In addition, Contractor agrees to file, or to cause its employees or subcontractors to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City’s Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Work.
3.17.16 Certification of License.
3.17.16.1 Contractor certifies that as of the date of execution of this Contract, Contractor has a current contractor’s license of the classification indicated below under Contractor’s signature.
3.17.16.2 Contractors are required by law to be licensed and regulated by the Contractors’ State License Board which has jurisdiction to investigate complaints against contractors if a complaint regarding a patent act or omission is filed within four (4) years of the date of the alleged violation. A complaint regarding a latent act or omission pertaining to structural defects must be filed within ten (10) years of the date of the alleged violation. Any questions concerning a contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors’ State License Board, P.O.
Box 26000, Sacramento, California 95826.
3.17.17 Authority to Enter Contract. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Contract have the legal power, right and authority to make this Contract and bind each respective Party.
3.17.18 Entire Contract; Modification. This Contract contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Contract may only be modified by a writing signed by both Parties.
3.17.19 Non-Waiver. None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either party, unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing.
3.17.20 City’s Right to Employ Other Contractors. City reserves right to employ other contractors in connection with this Project or other projects. 532
55452.01510\32977834.2
21 [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
533
55452.01510\32977834.2
22 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the respective dates set forth opposite of their signatures.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
By:____________________________
Andy Hall, City Manager
ATTEST: Dated: _______________
_____________________________ CITY CLERK of the City of San Clemente, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO AVAILABILITY
OF FUNDING: _____________________________ Finance Authorization G2 Construction, Inc., a California
corporation (“Contractor”)
By:_____________________________
John Ralph Alvarado, Chief Executive
Officer/Chief Financial Officer
Dated: __________________
By:_____________________________
Lydia Gonzales Alvarado, Secretary
Dated: __________________
534
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 23 -
EXHIBIT “A”
SERVICES / SCHEDULE
Contractor shall provide all labor, materials and equipment to perform the following work (collectively, the “Work”) to the City’s satisfaction:
1. Contractor shall custom fabricate and install their patented devices in 74 City catch basins (“CBs”) at the locations specified in Contractor’s Quote No. 240417-SC dated April 17, 2024 and fully incorporated herein by this reference.
2. The installed Full Capture System device counts are 47 CPS-Mod™ connector pipe screens and 16 GITS™ grated inlet trash screens.
3. Contractor will also fabricate and install 208 ARS-CL™ curb-opening screens in 58 of these City catch basins as directed by the City.
4. Twelve CBs will receive ARS-CL devices as their only device since a full capture device is not possible in those locations.
5. Contractor shall meet or exceed the standards and pricing in Contractor's master purchase agreement with OCPW / OCTA MA-080-20011478 for Trash and Debris Capture Devices, hereby incorporated fully herein by this reference.
6. Contractor will install 63 Full Capture Systems and 208 unique ARS-CL™ screens.
7. Contractor shall repair or replace any installed product that contains a defect in its workmanship or material within one year of the project acceptance date. If an installed product proves defective within ten years of the acceptance date, Contractor shall provide replacement parts at no cost to the City.
8. Contractor shall complete the Work within the following schedule, with any changes approved by the City:
535
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 24 -
EXHIBIT “B”
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Contractor shall perform the Work according to the approved plans and specifications on file with the City Engineer dated April 17, 2024 and incorporated fully herein by this reference.
536
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 25 -
EXHIBIT “C”
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
ARTICLE 1. BONDS
Within ten (10) calendar days from the date the Contractor is notified of award of the Contract, the Contractor shall deliver to the City four identical counterparts of the Performance Bond and Payment Bond on the forms supplied by the City and included as Exhibit “F” to the Contract.
Failure to do so may, in the sole discretion of City, result in the forfeiture of Contractor’s bid security. The surety supplying the bond must be an admitted surety insurer, as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120, authorized to do business as such in the State of California and satisfactory to the City. The Performance Bond and the Payment Bond shall be for one hundred percent (100%) of the Total Contract Price.
537
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 26 -
EXHIBIT “D”
WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
(ONE OF THE BOXES BELOW MUST BE CHECKED)
I have and will maintain a certificate of consent from the California Labor Commission to self-insure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this contract.
I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this contract. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Carrier____________________________________________________ Policy Number______________________________________________ I certify that, in the performance of the work under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, and I hereby agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of San Clemente and all of its officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, and losses relating to personal injury or death, economic losses, and property damage arising out of my failure to provide such worker’s compensation insurance. I further agree that, if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, I shall forthwith comply with those provisions.
WARNING: FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL, AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO
CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000), IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY’S FEES.
538
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 27 -
Dated: ________________________
G2 Construction Inc.
Consultant
By: ________________________________
John Alvarado
________________________________ Title
________________________________ Address ________________________________ 539
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 28 -
EXHIBIT “E”
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, all contractors and subcontractors that wish to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or enter into a contract to perform public work must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. See http://www.dir.ca.gov/PublicWorks/PublicWorks.html for additional information.
No bid will be accepted nor any contract entered into without proof of the contractor’s and subcontractors’ current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work.
Contractor hereby certifies that it is aware of the registration requirements set forth in Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 and is currently registered as a contractor with the Department of Industrial Relations.1
Name of Contractor:
DIR Registration Number:
DIR Registration Expiration:_________________________
Small Project Exemption: _____ Yes or _____ No
Unless Contractor is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption, Contractor further acknowledges:
Contractor shall maintain a current DIR registration for the duration of the project.
Contractor shall include the requirements of Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 in its contract with subcontractors and ensure that all subcontractors are registered at the time of bid opening and maintain registration status for the duration of the project.
Failure to submit this form or comply with any of the above requirements may result in a finding that the bid is non-responsive.
Name of Contractor
Signature
Name and Title
Dated 1
If the Project is exempt from the contractor registration requirements pursuant to the small project exemption under Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, please mark “Yes” in response to “Small Project Exemption.”
540
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 29 -
EXHIBIT “F”
PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BONDS
541
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 30 -
PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente (hereinafter referred to as “City”) has awarded to ____________________, (hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor”) _______________________ an agreement for ______________________________ (hereinafter referred to as the “Project”).
WHEREAS, the work to be performed by the Contractor is more particularly set forth in the Contract Documents for the Project dated ________________, (hereinafter referred to as “Contract Documents”), the terms and conditions of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor is required by said Contract Documents to perform the terms thereof and to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said Contract Documents.
NOW, THEREFORE, we, _______________, the undersigned Contractor and _____________________________________________ as Surety, a corporation organized and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the sum of ___________________________ DOLLARS, ($____________), said sum being not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total amount of the Contract, for which amount well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, if the Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and agreements in the Contract Documents and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on its part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their intent and meaning; and shall faithfully fulfill all obligations including the one-year guarantee of all materials and workmanship; and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers and agents, as stipulated in said Contract Documents, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a condition precedent to the satisfactory completion of the Contract Documents, unless otherwise provided for in the Contract Documents, the above obligation shall hold good for a period of one (1) year after the acceptance of the work by City, during which time if Contractor shall fail to make full, complete, and satisfactory repair and replacements and totally protect the City from loss or damage resulting from or caused by defective materials or faulty workmanship, Surety shall undertake and faithfully fulfill all such obligations. The obligations of Surety hereunder shall continue so long as any obligation of Contractor remains. Nothing herein shall limit the City’s rights or the Contractor or Surety’s obligations under the Contract, law or equity, including, but not limited to, California Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15.
Whenever Contractor shall be, and is declared by the City to be, in default under the Contract Documents, the Surety shall remedy the default pursuant to the Contract Documents, or shall promptly, at the City’s option:
542
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 31 -
(1) Take over and complete the Project in accordance with all terms and conditions in the Contract Documents; or
(2) Obtain a bid or bids for completing the Project in accordance with all terms and conditions in the Contract Documents and upon determination by Surety of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, arrange for a Contract between such bidder, the Surety and the City, and make available as work progresses sufficient funds to pay the cost of completion of the Project, less the balance of the contract price, including other costs and damages for which Surety may be liable. The term “balance of the contract price” as used in this paragraph shall mean the total amount payable to Contractor by the City under the Contract and any modification thereto, less any amount previously paid by the City to the Contractor and any other set offs pursuant to the Contract Documents.
(3) Permit the City to complete the Project in any manner consistent with local, California and federal law and make available as work progresses sufficient funds to pay the cost of completion of the Project, less the balance of the contract price, including other costs and damages for which Surety may be liable. The term “balance of the contract price” as used in this paragraph shall mean the total amount payable to Contractor by the City under the Contract and any modification thereto, less any amount previously paid by the City to the Contractor and any other set offs pursuant to the Contract Documents.
Surety expressly agrees that the City may reject any contractor or subcontractor which may be proposed by Surety in fulfillment of its obligations in the event of default by the Contractor.
Surety shall not utilize Contractor in completing the Project nor shall Surety accept a bid from Contractor for completion of the Project if the City, when declaring the Contractor in default, notifies Surety of the City’s objection to Contractor’s further participation in the completion of the Project.
The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract Documents or to the Project to be performed thereunder shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract Documents or to the Project, including but not limited to the provisions of sections 2819 and 2845 of the California Civil Code.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this _______ day of ______________, 20__).
(Corporate Seal)
Contractor/ Principal
By
Title
543
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 32 -
(Corporate Seal) Surety
By
Attorney-in-Fact
Signatures of those signing for the Contractor and Surety must be notarized and evidence of corporate authority attached.
(Attach Attorney-in-Fact Certificate) Title
The rate of premium on this bond is ____________ per thousand. The total amount of premium charges, $_______________________________.
(The above must be filled in by corporate attorney.)
THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM
Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety) ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
___________________________________________ (Name and Address of Agent or ___________________________________________ Representative for service of
process in California, if different ___________________________________________ from above)
___________________________________________ (Telephone number of Surety and ___________________________________________ Agent or Representative for service
of process in California)
NOTE: A copy of the Power-of-Attorney authorizing the person signing on behalf of the Surety to do so must be attached hereto.
544
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 33 -
Notary Acknowledgment
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ______________
On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual
Corporate Officer
Title(s) Title or Type of Document
Partner(s) Limited
General Number of Pages
Attorney-In-Fact
Trustee(s)
Guardian/Conservator Date of Document
Other:
Signer is representing:
Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies)
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
545
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 34 -
PAYMENT BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente (hereinafter designated as the “City”), by action taken or a resolution passed ___________ , 20____has awarded to ________________ hereinafter designated as the “Principal,” a contract for the work described as follows:
_____________________________________________________ (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the work to be performed by the Principal is more particularly set forth in the Contract Documents for the Project dated __________________ (“Contract Documents”), the terms and conditions of which are expressly incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, said Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with said contract; providing that if said Principal or any of its Subcontractors shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender, equipment, or other supplies used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of said Principal and its Subcontractors with respect to such work or labor the Surety on this bond will pay for the same to the extent hereinafter set forth.
NOW THEREFORE, we, the Principal and __________________________ as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the penal sum of ______________ Dollars ($___________) lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that if said Principal, his or its subcontractors, heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall fail to pay any of the persons named in Section 9100 of the Civil Code, fail to pay for any materials, provisions or other supplies, used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed under the contract, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department or Franchise Tax Board from the wages of employees of the contractor and his subcontractors pursuant to Section 18663 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, with respect to such work and labor the Surety or Sureties will pay for the same, in an amount not exceeding the sum herein above specified.
This bond shall inure to the benefit of any of the persons named in Section 9100 of the Civil Code so as to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
It is further stipulated and agreed that the Surety on this bond shall not be exonerated or released from the obligation of this bond by any change, extension of time for performance, addition, alteration or modification in, to, or of any contract, plans, specifications, or agreement pertaining or relating to any scheme or work of improvement herein above described, or pertaining or relating to the furnishing of labor, materials, or equipment therefore, nor by any change or modification of any terms of payment or extension of the time for any payment pertaining or relating to any scheme or work of improvement herein above described, nor by any rescission or attempted rescission of the contract, agreement or bond, nor by any conditions precedent or 546
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 35 -
subsequent in the bond attempting to limit the right of recovery of claimants otherwise entitled to recover under any such contract or agreement or under the bond, nor by any fraud practiced by any person other than the claimant seeking to recover on the bond and that this bond be construed most strongly against the Surety and in favor of all persons for whose benefit such bond is given, and under no circumstances shall Surety be released from liability to those for whose benefit such bond has been given, by reason of any breach of contract between the owner or City and original contractor or on the part of any obligee named in such bond, but the sole conditions of recovery shall be that claimant is a person described in Section 9100 of the Civil Code, and has not been paid the full amount of his claim and that Surety does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, addition, alteration or modification herein mentioned and the provisions of sections 2819 and 2845 of the California Civil Code.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this _______ day of ______________, 20__.
(Corporate Seal)
Contractor/ Principal
By
Title
(Corporate Seal) Surety
By
Attorney-in-Fact
Title
Signatures of those signing for the Contractor and Surety must be notarized and evidence of corporate authority attached. A Power-of-Attorney authorizing the person signing on behalf of the Surety to do so must be attached hereto.
NOTE: A copy of the Power-of-Attorney authorizing the person signing on behalf of the Surety to do so must be attached hereto.
547
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 36 -
Notary Acknowledgment
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ______________
On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual
Corporate Officer
Title(s) Title or Type of Document
Partner(s) Limited
General Number of Pages
Attorney-In-Fact
Trustee(s)
Guardian/Conservator Date of Document
Other:
Signer is representing:
Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies)
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
548
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 37 -
EXHIBIT “G”
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
(NOT APPLICABLE)
549
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 38 -
EXHIBIT “H”
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
3.13 Insurance.
3.13.1 Time for Compliance. Contractor shall not commence work under this Contract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Contractor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract as required in section 1.1.12 of this agreement.
3.13.2 Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Contract for work to be performed hereunder, and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Contract, the Contractor, in partial performance of its obligations under such Contract, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Contract the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the insurance requirements set forth herein, Contractor agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so. (A) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office "occurrence" form CG 0001, or the exact equivalent, and shall be no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and no less than $2,000,000 in the general aggregate. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.
The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Contract.
(B) Automobile Liability Insurance: Automobile Liability Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering "Any Auto" (Symbol 1), or the exact equivalent, covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities shall be in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 combined limit for each occurrence. (C) Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.
(D) Contractors Pollution Liability: Not used.
3.13.3 Endorsements. Required insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Contractor shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the City to add the following provisions to the insurance policies:
(A) Commercial General Liability
(1) Additional Insured: The City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Contract.
Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to "ongoing operations"; (2) exclude "contractual liability"; (3) restrict coverage to "sole" liability of Contractor; or (4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the terms of purposes of this Contract. For all 550
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 39 -
policies of Commercial General Liability insurance, Contractor shall provide endorsements in the form of ISO CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01 (or endorsements providing the exact same coverage) to effectuate this requirement.
(2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (B) Automobile Liability:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (C) Workers' Compensation:
(1) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.
(2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
3.13.4 Primary and Non-Contributing Insurance. All policies of Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability insurance (if required) shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.
3.13.5 Waiver of Subrogation. All policies of Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability insurance (if required) shall contain or be endorsed to waive subrogation against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Contractor or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Contractor hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subcontractors.
3.13.6 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible or self-insured retention in excess of $5,000 must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.
3.13.7 Evidence of Insurance. The Contractor, concurrently with the execution of the Contract, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates on forms approved by the City, together with all endorsements affecting each policy. Required insurance policies shall not be in compliance if they include any limiting provision or endorsement that has not been submitted to the City for approval. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a 551
55452.01510\32977834.2
- 40 -
person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15 days) prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, Contractor shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.
3.13.8 Failure to Maintain Coverage. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Contract does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Contractor or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Contractor payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Contract, effective upon notice.
3.13.9 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII and authorized to transact business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.
3.13.10 Enforcement of Contract Provisions (non estoppel). Contractor acknowledges and agrees that actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Contractor of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligation on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
3.13.11 Requirements Not Limiting. Requirement of specific coverage or minimum limits contained in this Appendix are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance.
3.13.12 Insurance for Subcontractors. Contractor shall include all Subcontractors as additional insureds under the Contractor's policies, or the Contractor shall be responsible for causing Subcontractors to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds to the Subcontractor's policies. All policies of Commercial General Liability insurance provided by Subcontractors shall be endorsed to name the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds using endorsement form ISO CG 20 38 04 13. Contractor shall not allow any Subcontractor to commence work until it has received satisfactory evidence of Subcontractor’s compliance with all insurance requirements under this Contract, to the extent applicable. The Contractor shall provide satisfactory evidence of compliance with this section upon request of the City. 552
553
/LF$&&
(%RUFKDUG$YH
6DQWD$QD&$
&XVWRPHU
&LW\RI6DQ&OHPHQWH 'DWH
&DOOH1HJRFLR 4XRWH1R 6&
6DQ&OHPHQWH&$
Eric H. Taylor
&RQWDFWV
1LNL%HDFK %\
(ULF+7D\ORU
93%XV'HY*&RQVWUXFWLRQ,QF
%HDFK1#6DQ&OHPHQWHRUJ
HWD\ORU#*&RQVWUXFWLRQFRP
3URGXFWV
*&360RGSDWHQWHGFRQQHFWRUSLSHVFUHHQVWDLQOHVVVWHHOFXVWRPIDE LQVWDOO **,76JUDWHGLQOHWWUDVKVFUHHQVWDLQOHVVVWHHOFXVWRPIDE LQVWDOO *$56&/SDWHQWHGFXUERSHQLQJVFUHHQVVWDLQOHVVVWHHOFXVWRPIDE LQVWDOO &RXQW
&LW\
6:,1/
/DQG8VH
6WUHHW1DPH 1HDUHVW;6WUHHW /DW /RQJ
*UDWHV
7UDIILF
&RQWURO *%03
)XOO
&DSWXUH6\VWHP
*%03
&XUE2SHQLQJ
6FUHHQ
$56&/
6FUHHQV
3/8 ( &DQDGD (O&DPLQR5HDO
7& &360RG $56&/
3/8 ( &DQDGD (O&DPLQR5HDO
7& *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 &DOOH9DOOH
3DUNLQJ
(O&DPLQR5HDO *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ 2&7$(&37LHU*UDQW$SSOLFDWLRQ
'%(0%( 6%(&HUWLILHG
4827(
&LW\RI6DQ&OHPHQWH
(O&DPLQR5HDO&RUULGRU 5XQRII7UHDWPHQW3URMHFW
&360RG *,76DQGRU$56&/IRU3/8&DWFK%DVLQV *ZLOOLQVWDOO)XOO&DSWXUH6\VWHPVDQGXQLTXH$56&/VFUHHQV&RVWVIRUUHTXLUHGWUDIILFFRQWURODQG FDWFKEDVLQFOHDQLQJDUHLQFOXGHG
2&3:2&7$0$IRU7UDVKDQG'HEULV&DSWXUH'HYLFHV
*RRGXQWLOIRU
'D\V
'(6&5,37,21
*&RQVWUXFWLRQ
*
SURSRVHVWRFXVWRPIDEULFDWHDQGLQVWDOORXUSDWHQWHGGHYLFHVLQ&LW\FDWFKEDVLQV &%V
7KHLQVWDOOHG)XOO&DSWXUH6\VWHPGHYLFHFRXQWVDUH&360RGFRQQHFWRUSLSHVFUHHQVDQG*,76JUDWHG LQOHWWUDVKVFUHHQV*ZLOODOVRIDEULFDWHDQGLQVWDOO$56&/FXUERSHQLQJVFUHHQVLQRIWKHVH&LW\FDWFK EDVLQV7ZHOYH&%VZLOOUHFHLYH$56&/GHYLFHVDVWKHLURQO\GHYLFHVLQFHDIXOOFDSWXUHGHYLFHLVQRWSRVVLEOH $OOORFDWLRQVDUHLQSULRULW\ODQGXVH
3/8
DUHDV
&RPPHUFLDO0L[HG8VH5HVLGHQWLDO0HGLXP+LJK'HQVLW\RU 2IILFH3XEOLF$OVRVRPHQRQ3/8UHVLGHQWLDOORZGHQVLW\DUHDUXQRIIEHQHILWVIURPGUDLQLQJLQWRWKHVH&%V 7KLVSURSRVDOXWLOL]HVWKH*
VPDVWHUSXUFKDVHDJUHHPHQWZLWK2&3:2&7$0$IRU7UDVKDQG 'HEULV&DSWXUH'HYLFHV IRUWKH&LW\RI6DQ&OHPHQWH
V2&7$(&33URMHFW;JUDQWDSSOLFDWLRQIRU7KH&LW\ LVHOLJLEOHIRUWKLVSLJJ\EDFNFRQWUDFWOLNHDOO2UDQJH&RXQW\FLWLHVZKLFKJXDUDQWHHVWKHEHVWSURGXFWVHUYLFHDQG SULFLQJ
RI
$WWDFKPHQW
554
3/8 &DOOH9DOOH
3DUNLQJ
(O&DPLQR5HDO *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ 3/8 &DOOH9DOOH
3DUNLQJ
(O&DPLQR5HDO *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ 3/8 $YHGHOD(VWUHOOD /D3DFHQWLD &360RG $56&/ 3/8 $YHGHOD(VWUHOOD /D3DFHQWLD &360RG $56&/ 3/8 $YH/RV)ORUHV (O2ULHQWH &360RG $56&/
3/8 $YH/RV)ORUHV (O2ULHQWH
&360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO : 0DUTXLWD
&360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO ( 0DUTXLWD
&360RG $56&/[
3/8 ORPD/Q 3DOL]HGD
*,76
[
1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 $YHQLGD0LUDPDU (O&DPLQR5HDO *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 $YHQLGD0LUDPDU (O&DPLQR5HDO *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 $YHGHOD(VWUHOOD ( $YH3DOL]DGD 7& &360RG $56&/[ 3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD$OJRGRQ &360RG $56&/ 3/8 $OOH\RII$YH$OJRGRQ(O&DPLQR5HDO &360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD&DGL]
7& *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD&DGL] *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 $YHQLGD&DGL] (O&DPLQR5HDO
7& *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 7UDIDOJDU/Q (O&DPLQR5HDO 7& *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 $YHQLGD6DQ$QWRQLR(O&DPLQR5HDO &360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGDVDQ$QWRQLR &360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQ$QWRQLR 7& &360RG $56&/
3/8 $YHQLGD&RUQHOLR (O&DPLQR5HDO &360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD&RUQHOLR &360RG $56&/[
3/8 $YHQLGD-XQLSHUR (O&DPLQR5HDO &360RG $56&/
3/8 $YHQLGD-XQLSHUR (O&DPLQR5HDO &360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQ3DEOR 7& &360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQ*DEULHO 7& *,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 $YHQLGD6DQ*DEULHO (O&DPLQR5HDO &360RG $56&/
3/8 $YHQLGD6DQ*DEULHO (O&DPLQR5HDO
&360RG $56&/
3/8 $OOH\WR(O&DPLQR $YHQLGD0DJGDOHQD
&360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD0DJGDOHQD 7& &360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD0DJGDOHQD 7& &360RG $56&/[ 3/8 &DOOH'HO&RPHUFLR $YHQLGD0DJGDOHQD &360RG $56&/
RI
555
3/8 6DQ/XLV5H\ (O&DPLQR5HDO &360RG $56&/[
3/8 6DQ/XLV5H\ (O&DPLQR5HDO &360RG $56&/[
3/8 6DQ/XLV5H\ $YHQLGD6DQWD,QH]
&360RG $56&/[
3/8 6DQ/XLV5H\ $YHQLGD6DQWD,QH] &360RG $56&/
3/8 $YHQLGD6DQWD,QH] 6DQ/XLV5H\ &360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO 6DQWD,QH]
*,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD'RPLQJXH]
&360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD'RPLQJXH]
7& $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQ)HUQDQG 7& &360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQ)HUQDQG
&360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD%XHQD9HQWX
7& &360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD'RORUHV 7& &360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD/XFLD
&360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQWD0DUJD
&360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQWD0DUJD
*,76
[
1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQWD0DUJD
&360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO &ULVWLDQLWRVUG
&360RG $56&/
3/8 $YHQLGD6DQWD0DUJD(O&DPLQR5HDO
&360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD0HQGLFLQR 7& &360RG $56&/[
3/8 $YHQLGD0DJGDOHQD (O&DPLQR5HDO
&360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD0DJGDOHQD
7& &360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD0DJGDOHQD
7& &360RG $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD0HQGLFLQR 7& *,76 [
1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
3/8 $OOH\3DUDOOHOWR(O&D$YHQLGD0DJGDOHQD &360RG $56&/ 3/8 (O3RUWDO (O&DPLQR5HDO &360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD0DJGDOHQD
7& $56&/[
3/8 /D5RQGD &KLTXLWD
&360RG $56&/[
3/8 $YHQLGD6HUUD (O&DPLQR5HDO &360RG $56&/
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD0DJGDOHQD 7& $56&/[ 3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO 6DQ/XLV5H\
7& $56&/[
3/8 6DQ/XLV5H\ (O&DPLQR5HDO
$56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQWD,QH] 7& $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQ)HUQDQG 7& $56&/
RI
556
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $VYHQLGD6DQ'LPDV
7& $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD/XFLD
7& $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD6DQWD0DUJD
7& $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO $YHQLGD3DOD
7& $56&/[
3/8 (O&DPLQR5HDO &ULVWLDQLWRVUG
*,76 1$QRFXUERSHQLQJ
0RELOL]DWLRQ
3URGXFW,QVWDOO7RWDOV
'HYLFHV ,QVWDOODWLRQ
&360RG)XOO&DSWXUH6\VWHPV &DWFK%DVLQ&OHDQLQJ *,76)XOO&DSWXUH6\VWHPV 7UDIILF&RQWURO
$56&/6FUHHQV 3URMHFW%RQGV
'LVFRXQWV
727$/&216758&7,21&267
7HUPV &RQGLWLRQV
3ULFLQJEDVHGRQ2&3:2&7$0DVWHU3ULFLQJZLWK9ROXPH'LVFRXQWV 3ULFLQJGRHVQRWLQFOXGHSURMHFWOLFHQFHRUEXVLQHVVIHHV )LQDOGHVLJQFRQILJXUDWLRQVDQGFRVWVWREHUHYLVHGDIWHUILQDOILHOGHYDOXDWLRQV 3D\PHQW1(7GD\V
7KDQN<RX:H$SSUHFLDWH<RXU%XVLQHVV
RI
557
City of San Clemente
G2 Construction – OCPW Master Agreement
558 27
/LF $&&
(%RUFKDUG$YH
6DQWD$QD&$
LQIR#JFRQVWUXFWLRQFRP
'DWH
0DUFK
&360RG$56&/ *,76
:$55$17<
3URMHFW
6DQ&OHPHQWH&360RG$56&/ *,766FUHHQV
&LW\RI6DQ&OHPHQWH 2&7$0HDVXUH0¶V(QYLURQPHQWDO&OHDQXS 3URJUDP
(&3
7LHU – 3URMHFW;
*&RQVWUXFWLRQ,QFKHUHE\SURYLGHVDSURGXFWZDUUDQW\RI\HDUVIRUWKH*&360RG FRQQHFWRUSLSHVFUHHQV*,76JUDWHGLQOHWWUDVKVFUHHQ DQG$56&/DXWRPDWLFUHWUDFWDEOH VFUHHQVLQVWDOOHGLQFDWFKEDVLQVIRUWKHSURMHFWOLVWHGDERYH*JXDUDQWHHVWKH&360RG *,76 DQG$56&/ZLOOEHPDQXIDFWXUHGDQGLQVWDOOHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHSURGXFW GUDZLQJVDQGVSHFLILFDWLRQV
*&RQVWUXFWLRQDJUHHVWRUHSDLURUUHSODFHDQ\LQVWDOOHGSURGXFWWKDWSURYHVGHIHFWLYHLQLWV ZRUNPDQVKLSRUPDWHULDOZLWKLQRQH\HDURIWKHSURMHFWDFFHSWDQFHGDWH,IDQLQVWDOOHGSURGXFW SURYHVGHIHFWLYH ZLWKLQWHQ\HDUVWKHQ*DJUHHVWRSURYLGHUHSODFHPHQWSDUWVDWQRFRVW $FFLGHQWVSURGXFWPRGLILFDWLRQVYDQGDOLVPXQXVXDOXVHRUODFNRIVWDQGDUGFOHDQLQJPD\ QXOOLI\DSURGXFW¶V ZDUUDQW\
5HTXHVWVIRUZDUUDQW\VHUYLFHPXVWEHPDGHE\WKHSURGXFW2ZQHUDQGVKRXOGLQFOXGHSKRWRV DQGGHWDLOV
-RKQ$OYDUDGR3UHVLGHQW
*&RQVWUXFWLRQ,QF
559
/LF $&&
(%RUFKDUG$YH
6DQWD$QD&$
LQIR#JFRQVWUXFWLRQFRP
,QVWDOODWLRQ6FKHGXOH
&LW\RI6DQ&OHPHQWH
2&7$(&33URMHFW;
0DUFK
$FWLRQ 7LPH
IURPVLJQHG
FRQWUDFW 173
(YDOXDWHDOOFDWFKEDVLQVDQGWDNHGHWDLOHG
PHDVXUHPHQWV
ZHHNV
)DEULFDWHFXVWRP&360RG*,76 $56&/ ZHHNV
,QVWDOOFXVWRPILWWHG*'HYLFHV ZHHNV
,QVSHFWLRQDQGVLJQRII
727$/352-(&7
VWDUWWRILQLVK
ZHHNV
:((.6
560
Design Drawings
561
&360RG
3DWHQWHG
&360RGXODU6HULHV
&$6WDWH:DWHU%RDUG&HUWLILHG)8//&$3785(6<67(0 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB *&360RG)XOO&DSWXUHPPSHUIRUDWHGVFUHHQVZLWK
SDWHQWHGPRGXODUGHVLJQIRUHDV\LQVWDOODWLRQLQVLGHFDWFKEDVLQV $SSURYHGE\WKH&DOLIRUQLD6WDWH:DWHU%RDUG/$&'3:2&3: 2&7$6)%D\5:4&% DJHQFLHVHYHU\ZKHUH7KH&36
0RGSUHYHQWVWUDVKSROOXWDQWVDQGGHEULVIURPHQWHULQJ ZDWHUZD\VWKURXJKWKHFDWFKEDVLQRXWOHWSLSH
x 0DGHIURP6WDLQOHVV6WHHOIRUH[WHQGHGOLIH
x 6L]HGWRPHHWRUH[FHHG\HDUKRXUVWRUP
x 0RGXODUWRHDVLO\ILWDOOFDWFKEDVLQW\SHV
x &XVWRPGHVLJQHGDQGIDEULFDWHGWRHDFKFDWFKEDVLQWR HQVXUHFRPSOLDQFHRIQRJDSV!PPLQVL]H
x 3URIHVVLRQDOO\LQVWDOOHGE\*RUDWUDLQHG FHUWLILHGLQVWDOOHU x 4XLFN5HOHDVH5HPRYDEOH
RSWLRQDO
x 0RVTXLWR 9HFWRU$EDWHPHQW'HIOHFWRU
ZKHUHUHTXLUHG
5HFRPPHQGHGZLWK*¶V$56&DP/RFN6HULHV
562
&360RG
3DWHQWHG
&360RGXODU6HULHV
)8//&$3785(6<67(0&HUWLILHGE\
&DOLIRUQLD6WDWH:DWHU%RDUG 5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\&RQWURO%RDUGV *&360RG&RQQHFWRU3LSH6FUHHQ
)XQFWLRQ
x &DSWXUHVDOOSROOXWDQWVPPDQGODUJHUWKDWHQWHUWKHFDWFKEDVLQ x 3ROOXWDQWVSUHYHQWHGIURPH[LWLQJWKHFDWFKEDVLQ
¾ 3ULPDU\
SODVWLFV
IRRGFRQWDLQHUV EDJVERWWOHVVWUDZV
WUDVK
SDSHUFLJDUHWWHEXWWVFDQV
YHJHWDWLYH GHEULV
OHDYHVEUDQFKHV ODQGVFDSLQJ
RWKHUDOORWKHUREMHFWV
¾ 6HFRQGDU\
SROOXWDQWVDEVRUEHGE\RUDWWDFKHGWRWKH3ULPDU\SROOXWDQWV,QFOXGLQJIURPYHKLFOHV
K\GURFDUERQVIOXLGVFRSSHUFDGPLXP]LQFWLUHVHWF SDWKRJHQVEDFWHULDSHVWLFLGHV
QXWULHQWVRUJDQLFFRPSRXQGVVHGLPHQWWR[LFLW\HWF
'HVLJQ)OH[LELOLW\ $SSURYDO
x &XVWRPGHVLJQHGDQGIDEULFDWHGIRUHDFKFDWFKEDVLQDQGLWVXQLTXHIHDWXUHV x )LWVDQ\VWDQGDUGFDWFKEDVLQZLWKGLVFKDUJHSLSHRQIURQWEDFNRUVLGHZDOO x $SSURYHGE\6WDWH:DWHUERDUG/RV$QJHOHV&RXQW\'3:&LW\RI/$2UDQJH&RXQW\'3:2&7$ 6DQ)UDQFLVFR%D\$UHD:DWHU5HVRXUFH%RDUGDQGDJHQFLHVHYHU\ZKHUH 0DWHULDO )DEULFDWLRQ
x 0DGHRIVWDLQOHVVVWHHO
JDXJHZLWKPPKROHV
x ³0DGHLQ&DOLIRUQLD86$´
9DOXH
x /RZLQLWLDOFDSLWDOLQYHVWPHQWUHODWLYHWRRWKHUVWRUPZDWHUTXDOLW\%03V/RZHUORQJWHUPDQGWRWDO OLIHWLPHFRVWVYVDQ\ZDWHUTXDOLW\%03RUWDNLQJQRDFWLRQ x 5HTXLUHVQRUHSODFHPHQWILOWHUVRUSDUWV
x *¶V&360RGLQFRPELQDWLRQZLWKWKH*¶V$56&/FUHDWHVWKHPRVWHIIHFWLYH%03V\VWHP DQGJUHDWHVWYDOXH
3XEOLF2XWUHDFK
x 5HVLGHQWVDZDUHRIWKH&360RGLQVWDOOHGLQWKHLUORFDOFDWFKEDVLQSHUFHLYHLWWREHDQ HQYLURQPHQWDOEHQHILWDQGGHPRQVWUDWHVDQHQYLURQPHQWDOO\FRQVFLRXVFRPPXQLW\ 5HFRPPHQGHGZLWK*¶V$56&DP/RFN6HULHVVFUHHQVIRUWKHPRVWFRPSOHWHIXOOFDSWXUHV\VWHP 563
&360RG
3DWHQWHG
&360RGXODU6HULHV )8// &$3785(6<67(0
564
127(6
723'()/(&725$61(('('
6833257%5$&.(7:+(1$
%2772075,06,=('72),7$61(('('
6((6+((7
*&RQVWUXFWLRQ,QF
&RQQHFWRU3LSH6FUHHQ
&36
127726&$/(
$
+E
+V
$
%
W\S
+V
W\S
+V
W\S
)XOO&DSWXUH0RGHO
*&360RGXODU
3DWHQWHG
9,
$
PP2SHQLQJ6FUHHQ*DXJH
$
/ $
PP2SHQLQJ6FUHHQ*DXJH
/ $%
%
W\S
$
PP2SHQLQJ6FUHHQ*DXJH
/ $%
%
6FUHHQPDGHRI6WDLQOHVV6WHHO
JDXJHZLWKPPRSHQLQJV
0DQXIDFWXUHGDQG,QVWDOOHG([FOXVLYHO\E\
2IILFH
&$/LF$&&
*&RQVWUXFWLRQ,QF LQIR#JFRQVWUXFWLRQFRP
(%RUFKDUG$YHQXH
6DQWD$QD&$
565
B
*,76 'URS,Q&36
*UDWHG,QOHW7UDVK6FUHHQ
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6WDWH:DWHU%RDUG&HUWLILHG
)8//&$3785(6<67(0
**,76JUDWHGLQOHWWUDVKVFUHHQLVD)XOO&DSWXUH
6\VWHPZLWKPPSHUIRUDWLRQV
x 0DGHIURP6WDLQOHVV6WHHOIRUH[WHQGHGOLIH
x )LWVXQGHUDQ\VL]HLQOHWJUDWH
x &XVWRPGHVLJQHGIDEULFDWHG ILWWHGWRHDFKJUDWHG
LQOHW³0DGHLQ&DOLIRUQLD86$´
x 6L]HGWRPHHWRUH[FHHG\HDUKRXUVWRUP
x 3URIHVVLRQDOO\LQVWDOOHGE\*RUE\WKHFXVWRPHU
5HFRPPHQGHGIRUJUDWHGLQOHWV
566
*,76 'URS,Q&36
*UDWHG,QOHW7UDVK6FUHHQ
)8//&$3785(6<67(0&HUWLILHGE\WKH
&$ 6WDWH:DWHU %RDUG 5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\&RQWURO%RDUGV *,76 8QGHU*UDWH 7UDVK&DSWXUH 'HYLFH
)XQFWLRQ
x &DSWXUHV DOOSROOXWDQWVPP DQGODUJHU WKDWHQWHUWKHLQOHWWKURXJKWKHJUDWH x 0HHWV&$6WDWH:DWHU %RDUG WUDVKUHJXODWLRQ7UDFNUHTXLUHPHQWV x (DV\WRLQVWDOOFOHDQDQGPDLQWDLQ
x 3ROOXWDQWVSUHYHQWHGIURPH[LWLQJ WKHLQOHW
¾ 3ULPDU\
SODVWLFV
IRRG FRQWDLQHUV EDJV ERWWOHVVWUDZV
WUDVK
SDSHUFLJDUHWWHEXWWV
FDQV
YHJHWDWLYH GHEULV
OHDYHVEUDQFKHV ODQGVFDSLQJ
RWKHUDOORWKHUREMHFWV
¾ 6HFRQGDU\
SROOXWDQWVDEVRUEHGE\RUDWWDFKHGWRWKH3ULPDU\SROOXWDQWV,QFOXGLQJIURP
YHKLFOHV
K\GURFDUERQVIOXLGVFRSSHUFDGPLXP]LQFWLUHVHWF SDWKRJHQVEDFWHULD
SHVWLFLGHVQXWULHQWVRUJDQLFFRPSRXQGVVHGLPHQWWR[LFLW\HWF 'HVLJQ)OH[LELOLW\ $SSURYDO
x &XVWRPGHVLJQHGDQGIDEULFDWHG IRU HDFKLQOHW DQGLWVXQLTXHIHDWXUHV )LWVDQ\JUDWHGLQOHW x $SSURYHGE\6WDWH:DWHU %RDUG2UDQJH&RXQW\'3:2&7$DQGDJHQFLHVHYHU\ZKHUH 0DWHULDO )DEULFDWLRQ
x 0DGHRIVWDLQOHVVVWHHO
JDXJHZLWKPPKROHV
x ³0DGHLQ &DOLIRUQLD86$´
9DOXH
x /RZLQLWLDOFDSLWDOLQYHVWPHQWUHODWLYHWRRWKHUVWRUP ZDWHUTXDOLW\%03V/RZHU ORQJWHUPDQG WRWDOOLIHWLPHFRVWVYV DQ\ZDWHUTXDOLW\%03RUWDNLQJQRDFWLRQ x 5HTXLUHVQRUHSODFHPHQWILOWHUVRUSDUWV
3XEOLF2XWUHDFK
x 5HVLGHQWVDZDUHRIWKH*,76LQVWDOOHGLQWKHLUORFDOJUDWHGLQOHWSHUFHLYHLWWREHDQ HQYLURQPHQWDOEHQHILWDQGGHPRQVWUDWHVDQHQYLURQPHQWDOO\FRQVFLRXVFRPPXQLW\ 567
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB [email protected] www.G2construction.com Santa Ana 714.748.4242 DBE, MBE & SBE Certified California
*,76 'URS,Q&36
*UDWHG,QOHW7UDVK6FUHHQ
)8//&$3785(6<67(0&HUWLILHGE\WKH
&$6WDWH:DWHU%RDUG 5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\&RQWURO%RDUGV 568
(QG9LHZ 6LGH9LHZ 7RS9LHZ
*&RQVWUXFWLRQ,QF
70 *,76 )XOO&DSWXUH6\VWHP 3DWHQW3HQGLQJ *UDWHG,QOHW7UDVK6FUHHQ0RGHO
[ZLWK%DVNHW
)XOO&DSWXUH6\VWHPIRU
'URS,QOHWVZLWKJUDWH
FRYHUV[
66JDXJH5LP$VVHPEO\ 66JDXJHPPSHUIRUDWHGPDWHULDO 66VROLGURXQGEDUGLDXVHGWRWULPRII
WRSRIEDVNHW0DNHVIRUQRVKDUSHGJH 666ROLGURXQGEDUGLDHDFKEDVNHWV KDVVXSSRUWPHPEHUV 0DQXIDFWXUHGDQG,QVWDOOHG([FOXVLYHO\E\
2IILFH
&$/LF$&&
*&RQVWUXFWLRQ,QF LQIR#JFRQVWUXFWLRQFRP
(%RUFKDUG$YHQXH
6DQWD$QD&$
6$03/('5$:,1*
569
570
$56&/
3DWHQWHG
$56&DP/RFN6HULHV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB *¶V$56&/DXWRPDWLFUHWUDFWDEOHVFUHHQZLWK&DP/RFN WHFKQRORJ\SUHYHQWVWUDVKDQGGHEULVIURPHQWHULQJFDWFK EDVLQVWKURXJKWKHFXUERSHQLQJ$SSURYHGE\/$&'3:
2&7$2&3:6)%D\$%$*DQGPRVWDJHQFLHV
$SSURYHGIRU7UDVK$PHQGPHQW75$&.FRPSOLDQFH
5HGXFHVFDWFKEDVLQFOHDQLQJFRVWVDQG&36PDLQWHQDQFH 3UHYHQWVXSWR
RIWUDVKDQGGHEULVIURPHQWHULQJWKH
FDWFKEDVLQ
x 0DGHIURP6WDLQOHVV6WHHOIRUH[WHQGHGOLIH
x &XVWRPGHVLJQHGIDEULFDWHG ILWWHGWRHDFKFXUE
RSHQLQJ³0DGHLQ&DOLIRUQLD86$´
x ,QGHSHQGHQW$56&/GHYLFHVRSHQDQGORFNEHWZHHQ
DOOFDWFKEDVLQVXSSRUWEROWV
x 6L]HGWRPHHWRUH[FHHG\HDUKRXUVWRUP
x 3URIHVVLRQDOO\LQVWDOOHGE\*
5HFRPPHQGHGZLWK*¶V&360RG6HULHV
571
$56&/
3DWHQWHG
$56&DP/RFN6HULHV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB $56&/$XWRPDWLF5HWUDFWDEOH6FUHHQ
)XQFWLRQ
x 6WRSVDOOSROOXWDQWVôLQFKHVDQGODUJHUIURPHQWHULQJFDWFKEDVLQVDQGZDWHUV\VWHPV x 6LJQLILFDQWO\UHGXFHVFOHDQLQJIUHTXHQF\IRUFDWFKEDVLQVDQG&360RGPDLQWHQDQFH x 3ROOXWDQWVSUHYHQWHGIURPHQWHULQJWKHFDWFKEDVLQ
¾ 3ULPDU\
SODVWLFV
IRRGFRQWDLQHUV EDJVERWWOHV
WUDVK
SDSHUFLJDUHWWHEXWWVFDQV
YHJHWDWLYH
GHEULV
OHDYHVEUDQFKHV ODQGVFDSLQJ
RWKHUREMHFWV
EDOOVWR\V
¾ 6HFRQGDU\
SROOXWDQWVDEVRUEHGE\RUDWWDFKHGWRWKH3ULPDU\SROOXWDQWV,QFOXGLQJIURPYHKLFOHV
K\GURFDUERQVIOXLGVFRSSHUFDGPLXP]LQFWLUHVHWF SDWKRJHQVEDFWHULDSHVWLFLGHV
QXWULHQWVRUJDQLFFRPSRXQGVVHGLPHQWWR[LFLW\HWF
x $XWRPDWLFDOO\XQORFNVDQGRSHQVGXULQJVWRUPHYHQWVWRSUHYHQWVWUHHWIORRGLQJ x $XWRPDWLFDOO\UHORFNVLQWKHFORVHGSRVLWLRQWRSUHYHQWSROOXWDQWDFFHVV x /RZPDLQWHQDQFH3UHYHQWV
RIWUDVKDQGGHEULVIURPHQWHULQJWKHFDWFKEDVLQ
'HVLJQ)OH[LELOLW\ $SSURYDO
x &XVWRPGHVLJQHGDQGIDEULFDWHGIRUHDFKFDWFKEDVLQ¶VFXUERSHQLQJ x )LWVDQ\VWDQGDUGFXUEIDFHFDWFKEDVLQRSHQLQJ
x $SSURYHGE\/RV$QJHOHV&RXQW\'3:&LW\RI/$2UDQJH&RXQW\'3:2&7$6DQ)UDQFLVFR %D\$UHD:DWHU4XDOLW\%RDUG&RQWUD&RVWD&RXQW\'3:DQG$JHQFLHVQDWLRQDOO\ 0DWHULDO )DEULFDWLRQ
x VWDLQOHVVVWHHOGHYLFH
x )DEULFDWHGLQ2UDQJH&RXQW\³0DGHLQ&DOLIRUQLD86$´ 9DOXH
x 6LJQLILFDQWO\UHGXFHVFDWFKEDVLQFOHDQLQJUHTXLUHPHQWVDQGFRVWV x /RZLQLWLDOFDSLWDOLQYHVWPHQWUHODWLYHWRRWKHUVWRUPZDWHUTXDOLW\%03V/RZHUORQJWHUPDQGWRWDO OLIHWLPHFRVWVYVDQ\ZDWHUTXDOLW\%03RUWDNLQJQRDFWLRQ x 5HTXLUHVQRUHSODFHPHQWILOWHUVRUSDUWV
x :RUNVLQKDUPRQ\ZLWKUHJXODUVWUHHWVZHHSLQJSURJUDPV $HVWKHWLFV (QYLURQPHQWDOLVP
x %HDXWLIXOVWDLQOHVVVWHHOGHYLFHVDGGDHVWKHWLFYDOXHWRVWUHHWVDQGQHLJKERUKRRGV x 5HVLGHQWVSHUFHLYHWKH$56&/WREHDQHQYLURQPHQWDOEHQHILWDQGGHPRQVWUDWHVDQ HQYLURQPHQWDOO\FRQVFLRXVFRPPXQLW\
5HFRPPHQGHGZLWK*¶V&360RG6HULHVVFUHHQVIRUWKHPRVWFRPSOHWHIXOOFDSWXUHV\VWHP 572
$56&/
3DWHQWHG
$56&DP/RFN6HULHV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 573
'HYLFH)LOWHUHG)ORZ5DWH&DOFXODWLRQ
:KDWDUHWKHILOWHUHGIORZ UDWHVIRU*&RQVWUXFWLRQGHYLFHVDQGKRZDUHWKH\GHWHUPLQHG" *&RQVWUXFWLRQ
*
UHSRUWVILOWHUHGIORZUDWHVEDVHGRQK\GURORJ\PRGHOLQJ DQG WHVWLQJ ZLWK ZDWHUIORZV
2XUGHVLJQWHDPDSSOLHV WKHVDPHIRUPXODXVHGE\WKH/RV$QJHOHV&RXQW\'HSDUWPHQWRI3XEOLF :RUNV
/$&'3:
WRFDOFXODWHILOWHUHG &)6
FXELFIHHWSHUVHFRQG
LQWKHLU7(&+1,&$/5(3257
RQ&RQQHFWRU3LSH6FUHHQ'HVLJQDQG)XOO&DSWXUH70'/&RPSOLDQFH $SULO
7KLVWHFKQLFDO
UHSRUWZDV VXEPLWWHGDQG DSSURYHGE\WKH/RV$QJHOHV5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\ &RQWURO %RDUG &360RG &)6)RUPXOD
:KHUH
4VFUHHQ 0D[&)6ILOWHUHGWKUXVFUHHQ
F &RHILFHQWRIWKHVFUHHQRULILFHIRUIULFWLRQ WXUEXOHQFH $ $UHDRIWKHVFUHHQ
J *UDYLW\
K 'LIIHUHQWLDOKHDGRIXSVWUHDPYVGRZQVWUHDPVLGHRIVFUHHQ 8VLQJWKLVIRUPXOD*FDOFXODWHVWKHILOWHUHG&)6IRUGLIIHUHQWGHVLJQVDQGZLWKGLIIHUHQW DVVXPSWLRQV&DWFKEDVLQGLVFKDUJHSLSHVDUHGHVLJQHGDQGVL]HGWRWUDQVSRUWWKH DUHD¶V VWRUPZDWHUIURPWKHFDWFKEDVLQ*GHVLJQVHDFK&360RG EDVHGRQWKHVL]HDQGORFDWLRQRI WKHGLVFKDUJHSLSH DQGVL]HDQGFRQILJXUDWLRQRIWKHFDWFKEDVLQ ,QDGGLWLRQWRPRGHOLQJILOWHUHG&)6ZLWKIRUPXODV*KDV WHVWHGRXUGHYLFHVZLWKIORZLQJZDWHU 5HVXOWVIRXQGWKDWDFWXDO IORZLQJZDWHU&)6UDWHVZHUH
RIWKHPRGHOHGIRUPXODV
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¶V$56&/ VFUHHQVYDULHVLQFXUERSHQLQJZLGWK EHWZHHQ¶WR¶DQGLVGHVLJQHGWR XQORFNDQGRSHQZKHQ´RIZDWHUSRROVLQIURQWRIWKHFDWFKEDVLQ7KHVDPHIRUPXODLVXVHGWR GHWHUPLQHGHYLFH ILOWHUHGIORZUDWHV6LPLODUO\ RXUGHVLJQHG ILOWHUHGIORZUDWHVIRUWKHFORVHG$56 &/ VFUHHQDVVXPHVWKHUHLVVRPHVFUHHQEORFNDJH/$&'3:KDVSHUIRUPHGK\GURORJ\WHVWVRQ WKH$56&/DWWKH6DQ*DEULHOGDPWHVWIDFLOLW\ DQGKDVDSSURYHGWKHGHVLJQ 'HYLFH )LOWHUHG)ORZ5DWH 7HVWLQJZLWK:DWHU
*¶VGHYLFHVKDYHEHHQWHVWLQJXVLQJIORZLQJZDWHUWRVLPXODWHUHDOZRUOGFRQGLWLRQV$WWDFKHGLVD UHSRUWRIILOWUDWLRQWHVWLQJ SHUIRUPHGRQWKHSDWHQWHG&360RG7KLVWHVWDQGWKHUHVXOWVZHUH LQFOXGHGLQ*¶V DSSOLFDWLRQ WRWKH6WDWH:DWHUERDUGWKDWUHVXOWHGLQWKHFHUWLILFDWLRQRI*¶V&36 0RG DQG*,76 GHYLFHVDV)XOO&DSWXUH6\VWHPV
574
&ŝůƚĞƌĞĚ&ůŽǁZĂƚĞdĞƐƚŝŶŐͲ'ϮW^ͲDŽĚ:ĂŶ͘ϮϬϭϵ ϭ
),/7(5(')/2:5$7(7(67,1*
'HYLFH7HVWHG
*&RQVWUXFWLRQ±&360RG
)LOWHUHG)ORZUDWH
&)6
7HVWLQJIRU*&360RG
6XPPDU\
/DEWHVWLQJRI*&360RGZDVSHUIRUPHGWRGHWHUPLQHILOWHUHGIORZUDWHV &)6
LQD
VLPXODWHGLQKRXVHFDWFKEDVLQV\VWHP5HVXOWVVKRZHGWKDWDQDYHUDJHVL]HG*&36 VTIWVFUHHQ
ZLOOILOWHUPRUHWKDQ&)6RIZDWHUZKHQFOHDQ7KLVILOWHUHGIORZUDWHH[FHHGVWKHSHDNIORZUDWHRIWKH RQH\HDURQHKRXUVWRUPHYHQWIRUPRVWFDWFKEDVLQVZLWKGLVFKDUJHSLSHOHVVWKDQ´5HVXOWVDOVR VKRZHGWKDWZKHQRIWKHVFUHHQLVEORFNHGLWZLOOFRQWLQXHWRILOWHUDWOHDVW&)6 7KHSULPDU\OLPLWDWLRQRIWKHWHVWLQJZDVGXHWROLPLWHGVXSSO\RIZDWHU
JDOORQV
ZKLFKZDVUHF\FOHG
GXULQJWHVWLQJ)RUDOOWHVWVWKH*&36VXFFHVVIXOO\ILOWHUHGDOOZDWHUIORZVZLWKRXWRYHUIORZLQJWKH VFUHHQ,IKLJKHU&)6IORZUDWHVZHUHDYDLODEOHGXULQJWHVWLQJWKHQKLJKHUPD[LPXPILOWHUHGIORZUDWHV ZRXOGKDYHUHVXOWHG
0HWKRGRORJ\
*EXLOWDQLQKRXVHZDWHUIORZV\VWHPZLWKWKUHHFKDPEHUV
:DWHU6RXUFH&KDPEHUKROGVXSWRFXELFIHHWRIZDWHU
JDOORQV
7HVW&KDPEHULVDVLPXODWHGFDWFKEDVLQZKHUHWKHWHVWHG&36ZDVLQVWDOOHG 5HF\FOH7DQNFROOHFWVWHVWHGZDWHU
FXELFIW
JDO
ZKHUHLWLVSXPSHGEDFNXSWRWKH
VRXUFHFKDPEHU
7HVW&KDPEHU'LPHQVLRQV
7HVWHG*&360RGGHYLFH
7KLV&36ZDVWHVWHGXQGHUWZRVFHQDULRV
VFUHHQEORFNDJH
EORFNDJH7KHERWWRPRIWKHVFUHHQZDVWLJKWO\FRYHUHGZLWKLPSHUPHDEOHSODVWLF EDUULHU
575
&ŝůƚĞƌĞĚ&ůŽǁZĂƚĞdĞƐƚŝŶŐͲ'ϮW^ͲDŽĚ:ĂŶ͘ϮϬϭϵ Ϯ
)RUHDFKWHVWXSWRFXELFIHHWIORZHGIURPWKHZDWHUVRXUFHFKDPEHULQWRWKHWHVWFKDPEHUDQG WKURXJKWKH&36
7HVW5HVXOWV
,QDOOWHVWVFHQDULRVWKH*&36ILOWHUHGRIWKHZDWHUZLWKRXWZDWHUULVLQJDQGRYHUIORZLQJWKHVFUHHQ $QDO\VLV
7KH&36FRXOGKDYHILOWHUHGPRUHZDWHULILWZDVDYDLODEOHZLWKRXWRYHUIORZLQJ7KHWHVWHG* &36KDGDILOWHUHGIORZUDWHWKDWH[FHHGHG&)6SHUVTXDUHIRRWRIVFUHHQ &RQFOXVLRQ
7HVWLQJVKRZHGWKDW*¶V&36RIDYHUDJHVL]H
VTIWVFUHHQ
ILOWHUVZDWHULQH[FHVVRI
&)67KLVUDWHH[FHHGVWKHIXOOFDSWXUHUHTXLUHPHQWVRIPRVWFDWFKEDVLQVZLWKDGLVFKDUJHSLSHGLDPHWHU OHVVWKDQ´7KHSULPDU\OLPLWDWLRQRIWKLVWHVWZDVWKHLQDELOLW\WRVXSSO\KLJKHUZDWHUYROXPHVDQGIORZ UDWHV)XUWKHUWHVWLQJLVUHFRPPHQGHG
3KRWRVRI&)67HVWV
*&)67HVWHU
FKDPEHUV\VWHP
:DWHU6RXUFH&KDPEHU &)
*DOORQV
576
&ŝůƚĞƌĞĚ&ůŽǁZĂƚĞdĞƐƚŝŶŐͲ'ϮW^ͲDŽĚ:ĂŶ͘ϮϬϭϵ ϯ
6FHQDULR
%ORFNDJHRI6FUHHQ 6FHQDULR
%ORFNHGZLWKSODVWLF
%HIRUH7HVW
7HVW&KDPEHU 'LVFKDUJH3LSH
'XULQJ7HVW
577
),/7(5(')/2:5$7(6/$%7(67**UDWHG,QOHW7UDVK6FUHHQ )LOWHUHG)ORZUDWH
&)6
7HVWLQJIRU**,76[
6XPPDU\
/DEWHVWLQJRIWKH**,76ZDVSHUIRUPHGWRGHWHUPLQHILOWHUHGIORZUDWHV &)6
LQDVLPXODWHGLQKRXVH
VWRUPZDWHULQOHW7KUHHVFHQDULRVZHUHWHVWHGXVLQJWKHVWDQGDUG**,76[
VTIWVFUHHQ
VFUHHQEORFNDJHVFUHHQEORFNDJHDQGVFUHHQEORFNDJH5HVXOWVVKRZHGWKDW &)6IORZUDWH
ZDVVXFFHVVIXOO\ILOWHUHGDFURVVRQDOOWHVWVDQGSURMHFWHGPD[LPXP&)6RIWKHXQEORFNHG*,76LV KLJKHUWKDQ&)67KLVLVDFRQVHUYDWLYHHVWLPDWH7KH*,76ILOWHUHGIORZUDWHVTXDOLI\LWDVDIXOO FDSWXUHV\VWHP
0HWKRGRORJ\
*EXLOWDQLQKRXVHZDWHUIORZV\VWHPWRVLPXODWHDVWRUPHYHQWIRUDJUDWHGLQOHW
:DWHU6RXUFH&KDPEHUKROGVXSWRFXELFIHHWRIZDWHU
JDOORQV
7HVW&KDPEHULVDVLPXODWHGLQOHWZKHUHWKHWHVWHG*,76ZDVLQVWDOOHG )RU7HVWWKH*,76WUDVKFROOHFWLRQEDVNHW¶VVFUHHQZDVFRPSOHWHO\RSHQ)RU7HVWDQGWKLFN ZDWHUSURRIWDSHZDVDSSOLHGWRERWKWKHLQVLGHDQGRXWVLGHRIWKHVFUHHQWRPDNHLWFRPSOHWHO\ LPSHUPHDEOH7HVW
EORFNDJH
ZDVFRQGXFWHGDIWHUWKH*,76ERWWRPZDVEORFNHGFRPSOHWHO\DQG DOOVLGHVZHUHZUDSSHGXSWRDKHLJKWRIWKHFROOHFWLRQEDVNHW7HVW EORFNDJH
ZDV
FRQGXFWHGDIWHUWKH*,76ERWWRPZDVEORFNHGFRPSOHWHO\DQGRIVLGHVZHUHZUDSSHGFRPSOHWHO\7KLV OHIWRQHVLGHRSHQ
RIWKHVFUHHQVXUIDFH
5HVXOWVDQG$QDO\VLV
7HVW
EORFNDJHZLWK
&)6ZDWHUIORZUHVXOWHGLQILOWUDWLRQWKURXJKWKHVFUHHQZLWKRXWRYHUIORZ :DWHUH[LWHGIURPWKHERWWRPDQGPLGGOHRIWKHVFUHHQEXWWKHXSSHUSRUWLRQRIWKHILOWUDWLRQEDVNHWZDVQRW XWLOL]HGLQGLFDWLQJWKHUHZDVPRUHFDSDFLW\,IKLJKHU&)6IORZUDWHVZHUHDYDLODEOHGXULQJWKLVWHVWWKHQ KLJKHUPD[LPXPILOWHUHGIORZUDWHVZRXOGKDYHUHVXOWHG 7KLV &)6ILOWHUHGIORZUDWHH[FHHGVWKHSHDN
IORZUDWHRIWKHRQH\HDURQHKRXUVWRUPHYHQWIRUPRVWLQOHWVZLWK´E\´JUDWHV 7HVW
EORFNDJHZLWK
&)6UHVXOWHGLQILOWUDWLRQWKURXJKWKHVFUHHQZLWKRXWRYHUIORZ7KH SURMHFWHGPD[LPXP&)6RIDQXQEORFNHG*,76EDVHGRQWKLVWHVWLV&)6 7HVW
EORFNDJHZLWK
&)6UHVXOWHGLQILOWUDWLRQWKURXJKWKHVFUHHQZLWKRXWRYHUIORZ7KH SURMHFWHGPD[LPXP&)6RIDQXQEORFNHG*,76EDVHGRQWKLVWHVWLV&)67KHILOWHUHGIORZUDWHRIWKLV WHVWH[FHHGHG&)6SHUVTXDUHIRRWRIVFUHHQ
&RQFOXVLRQ
7HVWLQJVKRZHGWKDW*¶V*,76[
VTIWVFUHHQ
VXFFHVVIXOO\ILOWHUVZDWHUIORZRI
&)63URMHFWHG
&)6H[FHHGV&)6
7HVW
DQGPD\UHDFK&)6
7HVW
7KH*,76ILOWHUHGIORZUDWHVTXDOLI\LWDVD
IXOOFDSWXUHV\VWHP7KHSULPDU\OLPLWDWLRQRIWKLVWHVWZDVWKHLQDELOLW\WRVXSSO\KLJKHUZDWHUYROXPHVDQG IORZUDWHV
578
*&)67HVW&KDPEHU
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 7(676
6FHQDULR
%ORFNDJHRI6FUHHQ
3UH7HVW6HWXS 'XULQJ7HVW
,PDJHDW0D[&)6 1R2YHUIORZ
579
6FHQDULR
%ORFNDJHRI6FUHHQ
7RSKDOIRSHQ
ERWWRPDQGKDOIRIVLGHVEORFNHG
3UH7HVW6HWXS 'XULQJ7HVW
,PDJHDW0D[&)6 1R2YHUIORZ
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6FHQDULR
%ORFNDJHRI6FUHHQ
)URQWVLGHRSHQ
VLGHVDQGERWWRPEORFNHG
3UH7HVW6HWXS 'XULQJ7HVW
,PDJHDW0D[&)6 1R2YHUIORZ
580
&DWFK%DVLQUHFHLYLQJ$56&/DQG&360RG
$56&/ &360RG
Z$56
&%:
IW
$56&/
&%&RXQW
/LQHDU)HHW
/)
RI
&XUE2SHQLQJ
&360RG
&%&RXQW
&XELF)W
/)
&XELF)W
/)
&XELF)W7UDVK
'HEULV&DSWXUHG
/LQHDU)HHW
/)
RI
&XUE2SHQLQJ
&DWFK%DVLQGURSLQOHWVUHFHLYLQJ*,76
*UDWH
6L]H &%&RXQW 64)7RI*UDWH2SHQLQJ
&XELF)W7UDVK
'HEULV&DSWXUHG
[
727$/
&%&RXQW &XELF)W7UDVK'HEULV
&DSWXUHGSHU<HDU
&XELF)RRW(VWLPDWH
HVW
&,7<2)6$1&/(0(17(
(O&DPLQR5HDO&RUULGRU5XQRII7UHDWPHQW3URMHFW
75$6+ '(%5,6&$3785(
$668037,216
$668037,216
&XELF)W64)7
581
&5('(17,$/6 48$/,),&$7,216
%DFNJURXQG ([SHULHQFH
*&RQVWUXFWLRQVWDUWHGRSHUDWLRQVLQ2UDQJH&RXQW\LQZLWKVWURQJIRXQGDWLRQVLQ ZHOGLQJFRQFUHWHFRQVWUXFWLRQVKRSIDEULFDWLRQDQGILHOGZRUN7KHFRPSDQ\EHJDQGHVLJQLQJ IDEULFDWLQJDQGLQVWDOOLQJFDWFKEDVLQFXUERSHQLQJDXWRPDWLFUHWUDFWDEOHVFUHHQV $56
DQG
IXOOFDSWXUHFRQQHFWRUSLSHVFUHHQV
&36
DQGRWKHUVWRUPZDWHUSURWHFWLRQGHYLFHVIRU/RV
$QJHOHV&RXQW\'HSDUWPHQWRI3XEOLF:RUNV
/$&'3:
DQGVRXWKHUQ&DOLIRUQLDPXQLFLSDOLWLHV
LQ
6LQFHWKHQ*KDVIDEULFDWHGDQGLQVWDOOHGWHQVRIWKRXVDQGVRIDSSURYHGFDWFKEDVLQLQVHUWV DQGVFUHHQFRYHUVRQKXQGUHGVRIVWRUPZDWHUSURMHFWVLQWKH2UDQJH&RXQW\DQG/RV$QJHOHV DUHD*RIIHUVFRPSOHWHVROXWLRQVE\SHUIRUPLQJSURMHFWHYDOXDWLRQDQGFRQVXOWDWLRQRQ VWRUPZDWHUGHYLFHVDQGWKHQGHVLJQLQJIDEULFDWLQJDQGLQVWDOOLQJKLJKO\HIIHFWLYHGHYLFHVWR PHHWDQGH[FHHGVSHFLILFDWLRQV
*¶V*HQHUDO&UHGHQWLDOV
x 2UDQJH&RXQW\3XEOLF:RUNV
2&3:
DQG2&7$0(QYLURQPHQWDO&OHDQXS3URJUDP
DSSURYHGVWRUPZDWHUTXDOLW\GHYLFHV
o &360RGSDWHQWHG)XOO&DSWXUH6\VWHPDSSURYHGE\6WDWH:DWHUERDUG o *,76JUDWHGLQOHWWUDVKVFUHHQ)XOO&DSWXUH6\VWHPDSSURYHGE\6WDWH :DWHUERDUG
o $56&/SDWHQWHGDXWRPDWLFUHWUDFWDEOHVFUHHQ
x 2&3:UDQNV*&RQVWUXFWLRQDVWKHLUVWRUPZDWHUGHYLFHSURYLGHU 5)3
5)3
$ZDUGHG0DVWHU3XUFKDVH$JUHHPHQWVFRYHULQJ x /RV$QJHOHV&RXQW\'HSWRI3XEOLF:RUNV &LW\RI/RV$QJHOHV%XUHDXRI6DQLWDWLRQ DSSURYHGSURGXFWV
$56&/ &360RG
x $VVRFLDWLRQRI%D\$UHD*RYHUQPHQWV
$%$*
$SSURYHGSURGXFWV
DOO
x &DOLIRUQLD&RQWUDFWRU/LFHQVHV
$
*HQHUDO&RQWUDFWRU
&
&RQFUHWH
&
:HOGLQJ
x 2UDQJH&RXQW\/RFDO6PDOO%XVLQVV
2&/6%
FHUWLILHG>VHH$WWDFKHG@
x 'LVDGYDQWDJHG%XVLQHVV(QWLW\
'%(
FHUWLILHG>VHH$WWDFKHG@
x 0LQRULW\%XVLQHVV(QWLW\
0%(
FHUWLILHG>VHH$WWDFKHG@
x 6PDOO%XVLQHVV(QWLW\
6%(
FHUWLILHG
582
*¶V7HFKQLFDO([SHUWLVH
*&RQVWUXFWLRQLVDWWKHIRUHIURQWRIWKHVWRUPZDWHUGHYLFHLQGXVWU\*KDVGHVLJQHGDQG IDEULFDWHGWKHPRVWDGYDQFHGVWRUPZDWHUSURWHFWLRQGHYLFHVWRVROYHWKHQHHGVRISXEOLF DJHQFLHVDQGSULYDWHGHYHORSHUV2XUDGYDQFHGPHWKRGRORJLHVIRUIDEULFDWLRQDQGLQVWDOODWLRQ KDYHPDGH*WKHLQGXVWU\OHDGHULQSURYLGLQJFXVWRPILWWHGVWDLQOHVVVWHHOFDWFKEDVLQLQVHUWV DQGFXUERSHQLQJVFUHHQFRYHUV
*KDVGHYHORSHGDKLJKGHJUHHRIWHFKQLFDOH[SHUWLVHE\LQFRUSRUDWLQJDOOSKDVHV HYDOXDWLRQ
FRQVXOWLQJGHVLJQIDEULFDWLRQLQVWDOODWLRQUHSRUWLQJ RIVWRUPZDWHUSURMHFWVDQGOHDUQLQJIURP
KXQGUHGVRILQVWDOOHGSURMHFWVRYHUWKH\HDUV:HKDYHEHFRPHH[WUHPHO\IDPLOLDUZLWKDOOWKH SURFHGXUHVUHTXLUHGIRUVXFFHVV
2XUGHSWKRINQRZOHGJHDQGWHFKQLFDOH[SHULHQFHKDVEHHQWKHUHVXOWRIVROYLQJPDQ\GR]HQV RIFKDOOHQJHVDQGFRQVWUDLQWVRISURMHFWVRYHUWZRGHFDGHV7KLVLQFOXGHVDPRQJPDQ\RWKHUV VROYLQJIRUDOOWKHYDULRXVFDWFKEDVLQW\SHVDQGVL]HVDQGFRQGLWLRQVWKDWZHIDFHLQWKHILHOG :H¶YHOHDUQHGVRPHWKLQJQHZIURPPRVWSURMHFWVDQGPRVWFOLHQWV2XUH[SHULHQFHVZLWKFLWLHV LQ2UDQJH&RXQW\DQGWKURXJKRXWVRXWKHUQ&DOLIRUQLDKDYHEHHQYHU\JRRGIRUPDQ\\HDUV %HFDXVHPDQ\FLWLHVKDYHGHYHORSHGDQDGYDQFHGNQRZOHGJHRIWKHLQGXVWU\DQGUHFRJQL]H TXDOLW\DQGYDOXHLWPDNHV*¶VZRUNPRUHHIIHFWLYHHIILFLHQWDQGYDOXDEOH )RUWXQDWHO\*¶VVWURQJFXOWXUHIRUSURMHFWPDQDJHPHQWKHOSVXVWRRUJDQL]HSURMHFWVHIIHFWLYHO\ DQGPDQDJHGLYHUVHWHDPV7KLVKDVHQDEOHG*WRKDYHDUDWHRIVXFFHVVIRU FRPSOHWLQJSURMHFWVDQGZLWKLQEXGJHW
*SURYLGHVLWVWHFKQLFDOH[SHUWLVHDQGLQVWDOODWLRQVHUYLFHVWKURXJKRXW&DOLIRUQLDDQGIRFXVHV RQWKH2UDQJH&RXQW\DQG/RV$QJHOHV&RXQW\UHJLRQV
583
Attachment 7
584
585
586
Attachment 8
RESOLUTION NO. 25-67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING A
COOPERATIVE PURCHASE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
TO G2 CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE EL CAMINO REAL
CORRIDOR RUNOFF TREATMENT PROJECT IN AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $410,000, AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT,
AUTHORIZING A RELATED APPROPRIATION AND
FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
UNDER CLASS 1 (EXISTING FACILITIES, 14 CCR SECTION
15301) OF THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente owns and operates a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) for the purposes of separating stormwater flows from the collection of municipal wastewater and protecting infrastructure and private property; and WHEREAS, under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), the City must comply with the conditions of a valid permit for discharges from its MS4, specifically, Order Number R9-2013-0001, as amended by Order Nos. R9-2015-0001 and R9-2015-0100, issued and enforced by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (“MS4 permit”); and
WHEREAS, the City also must comply with the 2015 Trash Amendments to the MS4 permit, which require full capture of trash greater than 5 mm in diameter in all high-traffic Priority Land Use areas; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to accomplish compliance with the Trash Amendments by “piggybacking” on the County of Orange Master Agreement with G2 Construction, Inc., which was executed for the purpose of assisting cities with such compliance, and which is permissible under California Public Contract Code section 10299 and Section XI(A)(1.4) of City Procurement Policy and Procedure No. 201-2-1; and
WHEREAS, the City finds that G2 Construction, Inc. can provide quality catch basin inserts at fair pricing and in a manner eligible for the $328,000 in previously awarded Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Environmental Cleanup Program grant funding; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Clean Ocean Fund has $87,500 in additional funding available in the FY 2025-26 budget to support the grant-required 20% local match.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Clemente does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and incorporated herein. 587
Resolution No. 25-67 Page 2
SECTION 2. That the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 1 (Existing Facilities, 14 CCR section 15301) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it consists of repair of existing public facilities involving no expansion of an existing use.
SECTION 3. That an appropriation of $328,000 from an OCTA Environmental Cleanup Grant to Account No. 057-543-43690-000-26802 is hereby authorized.
SECTION 4. That an exemption to competitive bidding requirements is hereby authorized and approved for and the construction contract for the El Camino Real Corridor Runoff Treatment Project, Project No. 26802, is awarded to G2 Construction, Inc. as a cooperative purchase agreement.
SECTION 5. That the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute a construction contract for the El Camino Real Corridor Runoff Treatment Project, Project No. 26802 with G2 Construction, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $410,000, in a form substantially similar to that presented to the City Council on May 20, 2025.
SECTION 6. That staff is hereby authorized and directed to take such actions as may be necessary and proper to accomplish the purposes of this resolution.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ____________________, _______.
ATTEST:
___________________________ __________________________
City Clerk of the City of Steve Knoblock, Mayor of the
San Clemente, California City of San Clemente, California 588
Resolution No. 25-67 Page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) §
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, LAURA CAMPAGNOLO, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 25-67 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Clemente held on the _______ day of _______________________, _________, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this _____ day of _________________, ________. __________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
Approved as to form:
___________________________
Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
589
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11I.
Submitted By: Public Works
Prepared By: Niki Beach, Environmental Programs Analyst Subject:
..titl e
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (OCTA) M2 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROGRAM TIER 1 GRANT SUBMITTAL AND A 20% MATCH FOR THE INLAND RESIDENTIAL AND RANCHO
SAN CLEMENTE INDUSTRIAL RUNOFF TREATMENT PROJECT AND FINDING THE
PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ..body ACT
Fiscal Impact:
If the grant application is authorized by the City Council and a grant awarded to the City, an appropriation of up to $564,000 in OCTA M2 Environmental Cleanup Program (ECP) funds, as well as a budget amendment to provide the 20% local funding contribution (match) of up to $141,000, will be required as either an appropriation within the FY 2025-26 budget or within the FY 2026-27 budget for Clean Ocean Improvements in order to fund the $705,000 estimated total project cost.
Summary:
On May 5, 2025, staff submitted an application for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project to the OCTA M2 Project X (ECP) Tier 1 Call for Projects. In order to be awarded a grant and receive funds from OCTA, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution that authorizes receiving funds from OCTA and approves funding the required local match amount for the project.
In order to improve water quality by capturing litter and trash greater than 5 mm in size, the City is required by the California State Water Resources Control Board to install 559 catch basin inserts throughout high-traffic areas, such as multifamily developments and commercial areas, by 2030.
A total of 244 catch basin inserts have been installed in recent years, through Phases 1 through 3 of the catch basin insert project. In a separate item on this agenda, staff is recommending the award of a contract for a fourth phase, consisting of an additional 74 catch basin inserts. This grant application is for the fifth phase of the project to install inserts on an additional 123 catch basins.
The following two photos depict the types of insert devices that support full trash capture throughout the City and as proposed in this grant application. 590
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11I.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2
Full-capture Grate Inlet Trash Screen (GITS) Full-capture Connector Pipe Screen (CPS)
In the 119 of 123 catch basins where CPS units can be installed, the grant application proposes also installing Automatic Retractable Screen (ARS) devices at the opening of the catch basin to trap larger debris such as cups, straws and other litter before they can enter the catch basin vault, improving functionality and reducing long-term maintenance burdens. Street sweepers can collect this captured debris during routine street sweeping processes. An example of an installed set of ARS devices is shown below.
Automatic Retractable Screen (ARS):
Background:
The California State Water Resources Control Board currently has a requirement for cities to install trash capture devices that remove litter and trash down to 5mm in size, to prevent this debris from reaching receiving waters such as rivers, creeks and the Pacific Ocean. Cities have until 2030 to retrofit catch basins that drain commercial, industrial and high-density residential land uses, also known as priority land use areas, to comply with the regulation, commonly known as the Trash Amendments.
In May 2010, the OCTA Board of Directors approved the Environmental Cleanup Allocation Program to make funds available through the Environmental Cleanup Program to help protect 591
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11I.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 3
Orange County beaches and waterways from transportation-generated pollution in stormwater and urban runoff and improve overall water quality. The OCTA Board of Directors approved a two-tier grant approach to the Environmental Cleanup Allocation Program; Tier 1 funding is focused on small localized projects, while Tier 2 funding consists of regional, potentially multijurisdictional capital-intensive projects.
Measure M2 (M2) Project X Environmental Cleanup Program (Project X Program) establishes a competitive process for projects that improve water quality in Orange County from transportationgenerated pollution. The funds are designed to supplement existing transportation-related water quality programs. Because of the competitive nature of the application process, not all cities submitting applications will be guaranteed grant funding.
Tier 1 of the Project X Program is designed to mitigate the more visible form of pollutants such as litter and debris that collects on roadways and in storm drains prior to being deposited in waterways and the ocean. The grant program can fund equipment purchases and upgrades to existing catch basins and related best management practices (BMPs) such as screens, filters, inserts and other street-scale low-flow diversion projects.
On May 5, 2025, City staff submitted an application for a Project X Tier 1 grant for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project, which, if awarded, will supplement the costs to retrofit 123 catch basins within the City that drain the priority land use areas. Staff estimates that there are a total of 559 catch basins in the City that need to be retrofitted to comply with the Trash Amendments. To date, the City has completed 244 catch basin retrofits and, as a result of last year’s Tier 1 grant application, was approved for grant funding for another 74 catch basins, for which City Council authorization of a construction contract is also being requested under a separate agenda item. Attachment 2 provides a map of the priority land use areas throughout the City, all of which will eventually be upgraded with catch basin retrofits or other “full trash capture”-equivalent BMPs. Attachment 3 provides the project area maps for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project, which is the focus of this 2025 Tier 1 grant application. This project, if awarded, would retrofit 22% of required catch basins, or approximately half of the remaining 241 catch basins.
Over the next few years and as additional grant funding becomes available, the remaining 116 catch basins, some of which have proven difficult to retrofit and will require special device configurations or alternative compliance approaches, will be addressed for trash capture requirements prior to 2030 to meet the regulatory compliance deadline.
Depending on the characteristics of each catch basin in the project, one of two types of trash capture devices -- Grate Inlet Screens (GITS) or Connector Pipe Screens (CPS) –are proposed to meet the requirement to fully capture debris down to 5mm in size, inclusive of material as small as a cigarette butt. Each CPS would be installed inside the catch basin vault at its outlet, and a Vactor truck would be utilized to regularly remove this debris from the catch basin. Each CPS device also has an overflow component so that during extreme rain events, the stormwater can overtop the CPS device and flow from the vault to prevent street flooding. The GITS devices serve a simar purpose but are installed below storm inlets whose opening is a grate that is level with the roadway surface. The ARS devices in this project are proposed to provide a first line of defense for trash entering an inlet equipped with a CPS, and are expected to reduce the amount of material that needs to be removed from the inlet vault, compared to the curb and gutter. They 592
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11I.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 4
also will serve an educational purpose by building visual awareness that only rain should be able to enter the storm drain. See above photos for sample images of each device.
Council Options:
Adopt Resolution No. 25-68 (Attachment 1), approving and ratifying the submittal of the Project X Tier 1 grant application to OCTA, approving the local match and finding the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Modify and adopt Resolution No. 25-68.
Continue the Item and direct staff to provide additional information. Note that in order to successfully complete the City’s grant application, City Council authorization is required by July 3, 2025, which is four weeks prior to OCTA allocating funds on August 1, 2025. Deny the adoption of Resolution No. 25-68 and direct staff to withdraw the City’s application to OCTA for Project X Tier 1 funding.
Environmental Review/Analysis:
The recommended action and subject project is categorically exempt from CEQA under Class 1 (Existing Facilities, 14 CCR Section 15301) of the State CEQA Guidelines, and consists of repair of existing public facilities involving no expansion of an existing use.
Recommended Actions:
Staff Recommendation ..recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 25-68, which will:
1. Find the action and the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 1 (Existing Facilities, 14 CCR 15301).
2. Approving and ratifying the submittal of the OCTA Project X Tier 1 Grant Application (Attachment 4).
3. Accepting any grant funds that are awarded.
4. Approving and authorizing a 20% local funding contribution (match) if the grant is awarded. ..end
Attachment:
1. Resolution No. 25-68
2. City Map of Priority Land Use Areas
3. Project Area Maps
4. OCTA Project X Tier 1 Grant Application
Notification:
None.
593
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 25-68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN
APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL
CLEANUP, TIER 1 GRANT PROGRAM UNDER ORANGE
COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ORDINANCE NO. 3
FOR THE INLAND RESIDENTIAL AND RANCHO SAN
CLEMENTE INDUSTRIAL RUNOFF TREATMENT
PROJECT
WHEREAS, Orange County Local Transportation Ordinance No.3, dated July 24, 2006, is known and cited as the Renewed Measure M Transportation Ordinance and Investment Plan and makes funds available through the Environmental Cleanup Program to help protect Orange County beaches and waterways from transportation-generated pollution (urban runoff) and improve overall water quality; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program consists of funding purchases and installation to catch basins with Best Management Practices, such as screens, filters, inserts, and other "street-scale" low flow diversion projects; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals; and WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente possesses authority to nominate water quality improvement projects that have a transportation pollution nexus to finance and construct the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, by formal action the City Council authorizes the nomination of the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project, including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizes the person identified as the official representative of the City of San Clemente to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required; and WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will maintain and operate the equipment acquired and installed; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will give OCTA's representatives access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the funded Tier 1 Grant Project; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will cause work on the project to be commenced within a reasonable time after receipt of notification from OCTA and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence; and WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the 594
Resolution No. 25-68 Page 2
American with Disabilities Act, and any other federal, state, and/or local laws, rules and/or regulations; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente must include all projects funded by Net Revenues in the seven-year Capital Improvement Program as part of the Renewed Measure M Ordinance eligibility requirement; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente authorizes a formal amendment to the seven-year Capital Improvement Program to add projects approved for funding upon approval from the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will provide a minimum of 20% in matching funds for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project as required by the Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Clemente hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. The recitals above are true and correct and incorporated fully herein as findings.
SECTION 2. The application submitted on May 8, 2025 to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Project X Environmental Cleanup Program, Tier 1 Grant Program, for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project is hereby approved.
SECTION 3. The City Manager, or his designee, as the official representative of the City of San Clemente, is hereby authorized and directed to accept funds for the Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project from OCTA.
SECTION 4. The City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized and directed to agree to fund the City's share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project.
SECTION 5. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to take such other and further actions and execute and submit such documents as may be necessary and proper to accomplish the purposes of this resolution.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of May, 2025.
595
Resolution No. 25-68 Page 3
ATTEST:
__________________________ _________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of Steve Knoblock, Mayor
San Clemente, California City of San Clemente, California
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) §
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, LAURA CAMPAGNOLO, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 25-68 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Clemente held on _______ day of April 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this _____ day of _________________, ________.
_______________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
Approved as to form:
___________________________
Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
596
Legend
Vortex Drainage Area
San Clemente Priority Land Use
Commercial
High-Density Residential
Industrial
Non-PLU
Attachment 2
597
City of San Clemente
Project Sub-Map Areas
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices.
Attachment 3
598
City of San Clemente PLU Map
Phase 5 – 2025
Inland Residential and Rancho San
Clemente Industrial Runoff
Treatment Project
599
City of San Clemente
Project Overview Map
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 1 2
3 4
5 6
600
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #1
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 601
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #1 Drainage
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 602
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #2
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 603
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #2 Drainage
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 604
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #3
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 605
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #3 Drainage
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 606
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #4
Median-High Density Res., Public, & Commercial
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 607
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #4 Drainage
Median-High Density Res., Public, & Commercial
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 608
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #5
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 609
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #5 Drainage
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 610
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #6
Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 611
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #6 Drainage
Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 612
City of San Clemente
Proposed
Inland Residential and Rancho
San Clemente Industrial Runoff
Treatment Project
CPS-Mod™ & GITS™ Full Capture System Devices &
ARS-CL™ Curb-Opening Screens
Prepared For:
Orange County Transportation Authority
Measure M2, Tier 1 Grant Application
Environmental Cleanup Program (ECP)
OC GO PROJECT X
600 South Main Street
Orange, CA 92863-1584
(714) 560-5363
DĂLJϱ, 2025
Prepared By:
Niki Beach
City of San Clemente
910 Calle Negocio
San Clemente, CA 92673
$WWDFKPHQW4
613
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. COVER 1
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
3. APPLICATION
A. SECTION I: General Project Information 3
B. SECTION II: Detailed Project Information & Scoring 5 C. SECTION III: Additional Project Details 13
4. ATTACHMENTS 15
A. Calculations & Support Documentation for Question #2 and #3 16 B. Detailed Project Estimate & Warranty 22
C. Location Maps &
Project Site Photos
29 46
D. Detailed Project Schedule 76
E. Design Drawings & Product Information
Trash & Debris Capture and Design Flow
79 99
F. City Council Resolution 101
G. Project Drainage Areas, Priority Land Uses, BMP Locations, KMZ files 106 H. Vendor and Installer Qualifications
Reference Letters
Orange County Local Small Business Certificate
DBE & MBE Certifications
109
112
124
125
2 614
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 1 of 12
APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
Local Agencies applying for Project X ECP funds are required to complete and submit this application. Any projects not in compliance with the CTFP Guidelines will not be eligible for funding.
SECTION I: General Project Information
Applicant Information
Agency: City of San Clemente
Project Title: Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project Device Type(s) &
Quantity:
G2 CPS-Mod FCS (119 devices), Grated Inlet Trash Screens FCS (4 devices) & ARS-CL systems (264 device screens in 119 CBs).
Project Manager: Niki Beach
Phone: (949) 361-8354
Email: [email protected]
Proposed Funding Summary
Total Project Cost: $705,000 Local Match:
(Cash Only, 20% minimum) $141,000
M2 ECP Funds
Request: $564,000
Project is Part of a
Larger Construction
Effort:
No
Project Readiness & Schedule
City Council Approval: (of Resolution) 5/20/2025
Design & Permitting (If Applicable) N/A
Award of Contract (Authorization by City Council) 10/15/2025 Construction/Installation (Start and Completion) Start: 11/17/2025 Completion: 1/28/2026
Application Checklist
YES N/A
A Environmental Documentation (As Applicable) ܆ 9
B Detailed Project Estimate 9 ܆
C Location Maps & Project Site Photos 9 ܆
D Detailed Project Schedule 9 ܆
E Design/Concept Drawings 9 ܆
F City Council Resolution 9 ܆
G Project Drainage Area(s), Priority Land Use(s), and BMP Location(s) shapefiles/KMZs 9 ܆
H Preliminary agreements with joint and/or third-party entities (As Applicable) ܆ 9 615
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 2 of 12
Project Description – Describe the project location and the Tier 1 type improvements proposed. If the project is included in an existing Integrated Water Management Plan, please provide details on why it was included. Use additional pages as needed.
The City’s proposed project is a continuation of trash capture devices located in priority land use areas, with this project focused on medium to high density residential communities inland of the I-5 freeway which passes through San Clemente parallel to the coastline. The project also includes a small section of industrial land uses at the southern terminus of the inland arterial Avenida La Pata. In total, the project will retrofit 123 catch basins (CBs) east of the I-5, which is an important but sometimes overlooked potential source of trash and bacterial pollution to the Pacific Ocean, no more than 3 miles from the most inland catch basin in this project.
This project location captures trash and debris on 284 acres of Priority Land Use (PLU), in primarily medium and high-density residential areas which are dispersed among lower density planned community developments, as well as a relatively remote portion of the City’s industrial land uses, which include light manufacturing and a regional animal shelter. This Rancho San Clemente Industrial Park is also adjacent to the City’s rather large Steed Park, which although not a PLU, may also be a source of trash which could migrate or be deposited in nearby streets within the industrial park. The project will fill in an important gap in the management of trash and related bacteria generated from streets within the Poche/Prima Deshecha watershed as well as the City’s southern coastal canyons, including some drainage to the largely undeveloped San Mateo Creek watershed.
The City proposes installing 3 types of devices in the City’s MS4 catch basins (CBs) to capture trash and debris.
The devices are designed, fabricated, and installed by G2 Construction, Inc. and are: 1) CPS-Mod™ connector pipe screen Full Capture System (FCS), 2) GITS™ grated inlet trash screen FCS in drop-inlets, and 3) ARSCL™ curb-opening screen. City staff believe G2’s CPS-Mod, ARS-CL and GITS systems will stop transportation related pollutants from entering our stormwater system and will improve water quality by meeting Clean Water Act standards for local waterways and beaches. G2’s storm water devices have a long track record of success in stopping pollutants and debris from entering CBs, the patented CPS-Mod and GITS devices are Full Capture System certified by the State Water Board, and their devices were very highly ranked by Orange County (OC) Public Works on both of their last two RFPs for Trash devices.
The project spans portions of the City’s Prima Deshecha watershed, which is largely developed and conveys stormwater to a concrete box channel, and its Coastal Canyons watersheds including the larger regional San Mateo Creek watershed, which are relatively undeveloped and drain to mostly natural canyons and creeks before connecting to the Pacific Ocean. In the northern reach of the project area, the City’s storm drain system directs water into the Prima Deshecha Canada Creek which runs parallel to the Camino de los Mares inland of the I-5, ultimately discharging to Poche Beach at the City’s northern boundary, and is Clean Water Action Section 303(d) listed for Indicator Bacteria, which can be correlated with trash loading. The San Clemente Coastal Canyons and San Mateo Creek are not currently 303(d) listed but are still subject to trash loading from the City’s higher density land uses east of El Camino Real and the I-5, and also its eastern industrial developments that drain to San Mateo Creek’s natural tributary canyons. See included maps. The targeted residential and industrial areas, along with the adjacent and heavily traveled corridors such as Camino de los Mares, attract high volumes of people and their vehicles, and even the inland areas have significant proximity and connectivity to I-5 and its on/off ramps.
The G2 CPS-Mod, ARS-CL and GITS devices are our selected Tier 1 BMPs because they provide two levels of pollutant filtration. The entire width of the CB curb-opening will be protected using the multiple-screen ARS-CL system. All 123 locations will have a CPS-Mod or GITS full capture system device installed in front of each discharge pipe to prevent everything 5mm or larger from escaping the CB and flowing downstream.
This project location and these Tier 1 type devices are selected because this project will deliver the greatest water quality improvement for the waters, land, and people of San Clemente available. No environmental documentation is required for this project. Attachments A-H are included. 616
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 3 of 12
SECTION II: Detailed Project Information & Scoring
1. Describe the need for the selected BMP(s), including nexus to transportation pollutants, and detail the benefits to water quality the BMP(s) will achieve. (up to 15 Points) The City of San Clemente needs the CPS-Mod™, ARS-CL™ and GITS devices for this project for multiple reasons. First, G2’s proprietary devices are custom designed, fabricated and fitted to the City’s existing MS4 catch basins (CBs) without the need for new concrete structures or excavation. These CBs are the best place to capture trash and pollutants flushed by rain events, wind or automobiles from roadways, properties, facilities, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots. All 123 catch basins for this project are in Priority Land Use (PLU) areas with a direct nexus to transportation pollutants.
Second, the ARS-CL™ curb-opening screen’s patented design stops pollutants ¾” or greater from entering the CBs during dry weather, and City street sweeping collects these pollutants. The top-hinge ARS-CL with G2’s CamLock Technology™ works with all of the City’s curb-opening inlets. Pollutants that make it into the catch basin are stopped by the second line of defense. The CPS-Mod™ have a patented design that stop 100% of particles 5mm or larger from exiting the CB and flowing downstream. This is also true of the GITS™ and both are certified Full Capture Systems by the California Water Board.
Third, all 3 devices are custom fabricated from 304 stainless steel and installed to fit each unique CB. The City believes installing these G2 devices is our best opportunity to stop the highest amount of transportationgenerated pollutants before they enter our stormwater system and travel downstream into the nearby Pacific Ocean. These BMPs also come with a 10-year warranty. G2’s inlet devices have a long track record of success in stopping pollutants and debris, and their devices were very highly ranked by Orange County (OC) Public Works on both of their two RFPs for Trash and Debris Capture Devices. The City will use G2 Construction’s Master Agreement with OCPW to get volume pricing discounts.
The project screens will be installed in key areas with land uses well documented to contribute to transportation-generated pollution, including suburban residential and industrial workplace destinations that are frequently driven to and from (See Project Description and Attached Maps). Notably, the COVID-19 pandemic increased the number of San Clemente residents who telecommute part or full-time and have more opportunities to drive to and from their homes to pick up a meal or run an errand between working hours and contribute to incidental trash generation.
The devices will benefit water quality through significant capture of pollutants flowing to 123 CBs. This will result in a reduction of trash and pollutants flowing into the Prima Deshecha Canada Creek and to the San Clemente Coastal Canyons and San Mateo Creek watersheds. San Clemente’s shoreline is 303(d) listed for Indicator Bacteria at Prima Deshecha Canada’s Poche Beach outlet. In both the Prima Deshecha Canada and Coastal Canyons and San Mateo Creek watersheds, the project will reduce visible pollutants, as well as the microscopic bacteria that often accompany trash, in the City’s creeks and beaches, while also reducing the harmful impacts to fish and wildlife of trash that makes its way to the ocean.
The City’s coastal water quality will also benefit from receiving significantly fewer loads of metals such as copper, lead and zinc from vehicles driving along these busy transportation routes and to concentrated commercial districts. Additionally, since the G2 CPS-Mod and GITS devices are approved Full Capture Systems they will also meet the State Trash Amendment requirement for these catch basins.
In summary, this project will install G2’s CPS-Mod™ and ARS-CL™ in the same 119 CBs; and GITS™ in 4 grated drop-inlet CBs. All 123 of these CBs will become Full Capture System compliant. In total, 264 unique ARS-CL screens will be installed in these 119 CBs. The project will cover 284 acres of PLU land. We have selected G2 Construction’s devices because they have been highly effective within the City and are approved by OCTA ECP and OCPW. These devices are the best value for the City’s water quality needs. 617
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 4 of 12
2. Based on information provided by the applicant, a cost/benefit calculation will be conducted to compare the total project cost to the area of priority land uses treated by the proposed BMP(s). Please complete the table below: (up to 16 points):
BMP(s)
Type 1 Type 2, etc.
Type(s) of BMP(s) proposed:
FULL CAPTURE
CPS-Mod™ &
GITS™ by G2
ARS-CL™
Curb-Opening
Screens by G2
Number of each BMP type: 123 264
Total drainage area(s) contributing to each BMP type: 284.8 279.4 Total
Drainage area(s) that is/are considered Priority Land Uses*: 284.8 279.4 284.8 Total Project Cost: $705,000
Cost/Benefit ($/ac of priority land uses): $2,475
Project Score (to be completed by OCTA):
Click to enter
text.
*Refer to City General Plans for general land use distribution/coverage information. Refer to the Statewide Trash Provisions for a complete definition of Priority Land Uses (e.g. high density residential, industrial, commercial, mixed urban, public transportation stations).
3. Pollutant Reduction Benefits: Project benefits will be based on treatment capacity and BMP type.
Applicant to provide the calculations used to determine the following scores: (up to 12 points):
Line Factor Points
Available Multiplier Line Score
A Fractional percent of 1-yr, 1-hr event peak flowrate treated by the BMP(s) 0 to 1 3 3 B Fractional percent of 85th percentile, 24-hr design event that is treated by the BMP(s) 0 to 1.5 3 4.5
C
BMP Multiplier:
0 to 1 6 0
•0 points if BMP is not low-impact development (LID) or treatment control •1/3 point for high-capacity systems
•2/3 point for filters/biofilters
•1 point for zero-discharge BMPs
Project Score: 7.5
Scoring Equation (Max 12 points): (Ax3) + (Bx3) + (Cx6) Calculations may be provided on a separate sheet
618
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 5 of 12
4. How effectively will the proposed project deal with the more visible forms of pollutants, such as litter and debris? (up to 10 points)
The City’s proposed project will have a very significant impact reducing visible forms of pollutants from entering the water systems and showing up in the waters downstream and on Orange County beaches. This project will utilize two very strong lines of defense that work to capture visible pollution before travelling downstream.
1.) The CPS-Mod™ and GITS™ Full Capture Systems will stop 100% of visible pollutants that get past an existing ARS or through a grate and enter the catch basin. The CPS-Mod and GITS devices will stop everything 5mm and larger from exiting the catch basin and entering the connector pipe and waterways. These pollutants such as plastic (small pieces of bottles, cups, bags, containers, straws, mylar, Styrofoam, etc.), cigarette butts, and more are screened from the water before ever entering the connector pipe and waterways.
2.) The ARS-CL™ curb-opening screens are designed to stop the most visible pollutants from ever entering our catch basins. The ARS-CL stops everything ¾” or larger, such as takeout food waste, Aluminum cans, glass and plastic bottles, and even leaf litter from entering the catch basin. The City’s street sweeping program then removes this debris on a prompt and regular basis. Also, the ARS screens close off the entire curb opening of each catch basin and physically prevent people from consciously or unconsciously putting trash into the catch basin. This acts as an excellent deterrent to polluters and reminds everyone that trash and pollutants should never be discarded into the storm drain system.
Through this two-prong approach, the City’s proposed CPS-Mod, GITS, and ARS-CL project is the most effective solution readily available for stopping the most visible forms of pollutants from entering the storm water system. Installation of these catch basin screens is also a very cost-effective retrofit project to prevent trash from traveling downstream, and their benefits continue to increase proportional to the number of devices that can be installed throughout the City.
The City of San Clemente also believes that educating the public is an important nonstructural BMP for protecting the coastal environment. When our residents see installed ARS-CL screens, they not only serve as a physical barrier for trash, but also promote the understanding that trash and other items should not be allowed into catch basins. The City anticipates that this visual reminder, especially in residential neighborhoods, will play a long-term role in reducing the amount of pollution that people generate, ultimately reducing the amount of capture and related maintenance required in its storm drain inlets. 619
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 6 of 12
5. What other BMP types were considered for this project? Why was the proposed BMP chosen? (5 points) The City has considered many alternative BMPs before selecting G2’s products.
1. Hydrodynamic separators have been installed in some coastal areas of the City. These are expensive projects ($500K+) that are required to be approved annually by the City Council during the budget process for the Capital Improvement Program. In order to install these large devices, the City needs to identify a location where there is an existing easement and where access to the site is feasible for a Vactor truck to conduct its cleaning. It was determined that no site was available for a separator that would capture debris from the area proposed in this project. And, due to the cost for purchase and installation of these products, the cost per acre for treatment is quite high.
2. The City has existing hanging filter baskets in some catch basins along the main thoroughfares, but they ultimately need to be removed and replaced because they are very difficult to clean and do not meet full capture equivalency per Water Board requirements. The ARS-CL devices in this project will solve much of the existing maintenance problems going forward since the larger debris can be collected by City maintenance or street sweeping vehicles prior to entering the catch basin vault, thus reducing the amount of debris that collects in the vault and needs to be vacuumed during maintenance. Meanwhile, the CPS-Mod units will function more effectively within the vault and meet full capture equivalency that is lacking in many of the other filter baskets.
3. Permeable pavement was considered, but these areas of the City were built many years ago and a retrofit of paved streets, especially including an increased maintenance schedule, would prove to be prohibitively expensive. Also, this alternative would not capture all visible pollutants, and would not be feasible in several portions of the project with privately owned streets that nonetheless drain to City storm drain inlets.
4. The installation of bioretention basin(s) continue to be reviewed City-wide, but presently, there is no suitable location in the City’s watersheds that would treat a similar PLU area due to lack of city property ownership, city easements, and the constraints of the already built out areas. Retention basins are desirable but are expensive and take significant time and cost to design, approve, and install. Therefore, the cost per location, as well as a lack of available space for placement, would make this BMP very difficult to pursue.
The City selected the CPS-Mod, GITS, and ARS-CL for this project because they deliver greater value than other existing BMP options, have a proven record of efficacy, are easy to install inside existing catch basins, and can be installed very quickly with minimal disruption to traffic or other City services. Effectiveness and affordability for these custom-fabricated and installed devices allows for a high number of catch basins to be retrofitted with significant pollutant reduction that is realized immediately following installation. 620
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 7 of 12
6. Provide information on proposed BMP performance efficiency and/or effectiveness, including pollutant capture, storage capacity, flow capacity, etc. (up to 6 points) According to G2 Construction, the designer and manufacturer of the CPS-Mod™, GITS™, and ARS-CL™ patented devices, these storm water screens have proven effective over the past 18 years, with over 30 thousand devices installed in California.
Performance Effectiveness:
CPS-Mod – 100% reduction in litter, debris and pollutants that are 5mm or larger. State Water Board certified as trash Full Capture System.
GITS – 100% reduction in litter, debris and pollutants that are 5mm or larger. State Water Board certified as trash Full Capture System.
ARS-CL prevents 85-95% of debris, trash, and pollutants from ever entering the waterway system from jurisdictional streets.
Storage Capacity:
CPS-Mod – 44 cubic feet (average; size of catch basin to the height of the CPS screen) GITS - 5 cubic feet (average)
ARS-CL – Blocks entry into CB. Unlimited capacity, but does not “store.” Collected by street sweeping or other street maintenance events.
Filtered Flow Rates in CFS (Cubic Feet per Second):
CPS-Mod: 4.2 sqft screen = 4.06 CFS @ 5mm;
CPS-Mod: 7.0 sqft screen = 6.76 CFS @ 5mm;
CPS-Mod: 11.0 sqft screen = 10.63 CFS @ 5mm;
GITS : 7.0 sqft screen = 6.76 CFS @ 5mm;
ARS-CL: 3.5’ = 1.45 CFS; 5’ = 2.13 CFS; 7’ = 2.93 CFS; 10’ = 4.31 CFS; 14’ = 6.02 CFS; 21’ = 8.99 CFS; 28’ = 12.08 CFS @ ¾” filter.
In 2005-2006 Laguna Hills participated in the Sulphur Solution Project with the City of Laguna Niguel. One key component of the project was to install automatic retractable screens (ARS) in catch basins across the City. In 2006, following installations, the City’s catch basins were cleaned and the trash, debris, soil and “muck” was measured and the data was analyzed.
Data analysis showed that ARS retrofitted catch basins had a 70% drop in the volume of trash and an 81% drop in the volume of soil/muck/sediment, as compared with similar catch basins with ARS screens.
Average volume in catch basins without ARS was 4.7 cubic feet, while average volume with ARS was 1.4 cubic feet, with a net reduction of 3.3 cubic feet per catch basin. The City’s street sweeper collected and removed debris prior to entry into the catch basin. This data was submitted to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board that year.
The G2 ARS-CL is a more effective design, higher quality, and longer lasting than the 1st generation ARS installed in 2005-2006. It was tested by LACDPW at their BMP testing site at San Gabriel dam. A total of 10 tests were performed including water flow rates ranging from 0.25 to 5.0 CFS. The ARS-CL passed testing at all flow ranges and the Design Division concluded the device met all requirements for performance and safety. This product is approved throughout California.
G2 Construction’s ARS-CL is customized during fabrication to fit each specific catch basin, which is of particular benefit in a city like San Clemente with older and irregularly sized existing infrastructure. The ARS screens prevent all objects ¾” or larger from entering the catch basin and the current model ARS-CL prevents 85-95% of debris, trash, and pollutants from ever entering the stormwater collection system from City streets.
621
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 8 of 12
7. Project Readiness: How long after OCTA Board of Directors approval (anticipated August 2025) will the project be operational (select one)? (up to 6 points):
܈> 4 Months
6 Points
܆ 4 – 8 Months
4 Points
܆ 8 – 12 Months
2 Points
܆ < 12 Months
1 Point
8. Will the project provide any secondary benefits beyond water quality improvements (i.e., water-use efficiency, public awareness, flood control, recreation, habitat, sustainability)? (up to 5 points) Secondary benefits beyond water quality improvements include:
1. The protection of sensitive riparian habitats, aquatic and terrestrial life, local fisheries, and bird populations, among other natural resources, will benefit from the project’s CPS-Mod, GITS, and ARS-CL BMPs because they capture trash that can be mistaken for food or can break down and become microplastics embedded in the marine food chain. The project would also help prevent plastics and other trash from entangling or being swallowed by birds and other native wild animals.
2. Recreationally, San Clemente is very popular for surf and water sports. This project will improve the water quality and reduce dangerous and unsightly trash along both San Clemente City beaches and San Clemente and San Onofre State Beaches, known internationally -- and recently selected to host the 2028 Olympics -- for competitive surfing. Health and human safety protections for children and adults playing on the beach and in the water, and for surfers and their spectators, are a clear benefit of the reduction of sharp objects (metal, broken glass, etc.), cigarette butts, and bacteria on local beaches.
3. Similarly, the economic benefits of tourism are critical to the City’s vitality. The continued reduction of trash and pollution on beaches within or adjacent to the City will continue to grow the economy through a positive public image and increased tourism. San Clemente’s business community has historically depended on its clean beaches to attract residents, visitors, tourists and even surf contest sponsors to this particular stretch of shoreline. Without projects such as this proposal, persistent reports of trash or bacterial pollution at beaches may send visitors to coastal vacation or surf spots elsewhere.
4. As with increasing tourism, property values (and related tax revenues to the City) may also be increased in areas exhibiting ARS-CL and CPS-Mod stainless steel device installationss because of how they demonstrate the City’s efforts in environmental protection, and the related sense of civic pride, to existing owners and prospective buyers.
5. Public awareness that stormwater catch basins need to be protected from trash and pollutants is important. The City’s installation of ARS-CL and CPS-Mod throughout the City shows the public that maintaining a stormwater collection system to protect water quality is a very high priority. Seeing an ARS-CL in particular ca. Similarly, observations of trash recently trapped in front of an ARS-CL can encourage citizens to make more sustainable choices in purchasing disposable items, such as by avoiding single-use plastics. The project will make pollution less of an out-of-sight, out-of-mind problem.
6. Sustainable and proper functioning of the storm drain system -- with less trash and bacteria causing problems -- protects local neighborhoods, as well as stream beds and shorelines, from flooding or unnatural ponding that could be caused by obstructions in the conveyance system, and safeguards the quality of soils beneath and adjacent to the system, also reducing the introduction of pollutants into the terrestrial human and natural environments.
622
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 9 of 12
9. What is the methodology for measuring pollutant reduction before and after the BMP is implemented? How frequently will monitoring and performance assessment occur? (up to 10 points) The City’s methodology for measuring pollutant reduction and monitoring performance is planned as follows:
1. Trash and debris removed during the City’s catch basin cleanings will be measured and documented.
New data will be compared to prior data and the City will be able to quantify the effectiveness of the CPS-Mod or GITS and ARS-CL devices. The results can be reported to the Regional Water Quality Control Board as a part of the NPDES annual report.
2. The City street maintenance staff and utilities crew supervisor will visually observe the amount of pollutants and debris that build up in front of the ARS-CL screens. Staff will drive the streets routinely and provide input and feedback about the amount of pollution. Special attention will be paid to the installed locations before, during and after storms. When excess amounts are found in front of the ARS, or are reported by the public or other department staff, they will be promptly removed by street maintenance staff or the City’s contracted street sweepers.
3. Visual inspections of every CPS-Mod, ARS-CL, and GITS installed will be conducted at a minimum twice per year (an increase from once per year), and observations about trash and debris levels in front will be made.
4. Discussions and interviews with street sweeping and collections crews regarding the quantity and types of trash found in front of catch basins will continue to help build understanding of the types and quantity of pollution being intercepted. This will also help identify specific catch basins or areas that accumulate more amounts of debris. This information can help develop education programs that target specific areas where more debris is observed.
623
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 10 of 12
10. Provide an operations and maintenance plan for the lifespan of the proposed project. Include schedule of inspections, cleaning, removal and disposal of pollutants, repairs, etc. (up to 15 points) The City’s operations and maintenance plan for the proposed CPS-MOD, GITS, and ARS-CL screens includes regular inspections, cleanings, and maintenance for their ten-year lifespan. Services performed by the City will include:
1. Inspections of the CPS-Mod, GITS, and ARS-CL devices will be conducted a minimum of twice annually by the City’s collections maintenance team or outside contractor. Inspections will include visually checking both devices and mechanically checking the ARS. The locking system will be inspected annually as required by the manufacturer’s warranty. The inspection will either document any issues that need to be addressed, or verify the device(s)’ working order.
2. If repairs are needed after being identified during inspection and the City cannot easily fix, then these issues will be documented. The City will take photos, and provide a description and location. G2 Construction will evaluate the information and repair under their warranty.
3. Cleaning the front ARS-CL screen will at a minimum be performed weekly for arterial highways and every two weeks for residential streets by the City’s contracted street sweepers. As required, the ARS screens will be kept clean and not have mud or debris built up in from of it. Street sweeping is an approved cleaning method for ARS devices to ensure they function appropriately, in addition to helping effectively remove trash and objects before they enter the storm drain system.
4. The CPS-Mod and GITS in each catch basin will be cleaned three (3) times annually, as needed, and is typically scheduled in October prior to the rainy season, January and May (or prior to significant storm events). The ARS, CPS, and GITS screens are also cleaned off during this removal of trash and debris. The non-hazardous materials are collected and disposed of in the City’s street sweeping debris waste bin, which is considered by the County of Orange as a limited volume transfer station.
Any hazardous material will be contained and disposed of properly.
5. After each significant storm event, the City’s collections staff or contractor will visually inspect the ARS devices from the exterior of the catch basin to check for open, damaged, or clogged screens, as recommended by the manufacturer. This identifies any issue that may have been caused by the storm, and before the next street sweeping event. Crews will remove debris that may be preventing the ARS from fully closing and locking. The screen will be returned to its default locked position. If any problems are identified, then any fixes that are easy and will follow the manufacturer’s operations and maintenance guidelines will be completed. This will be the standard procedure after each significant storm event.
6. The City will request service under – and/or eventually, outside of -- warranty from G2 Construction as needed, in order to keep all installed devices on this project working effectively. This ensures that the City’s installation of full-capture systems, as required by the State, have a long-term and lasting benefit to water quality.
624
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 11 of 12
11. BONUS: Is the proposed local match over the 20% minimum cash match requirement? If yes, enter match rate here. (0.5 points for each 5% overmatch, up to 5 points) N/A
Note: In-kind services are not eligible as local match
SECTION III: Additional Project Details
Match Sources
Other Grants: Non-M2 competitive grants may be used as match. Any grants used as match must be dedicated to the project for match credit to be received. Please list the name and amount of match sources.
N/A
Supplanting or Replacing Funds
ECP funds are designed to supplement, not supplant, existing water quality programs. Proposed projects must improve and not replace existing pollution reduction efforts by an eligible party. Please clarify that the proposed project will not be supplanting any existing water quality programs or other obligations.
This proposed City project will not supplant any existing water quality program. This project will improve water quality and reduce pollution, and it will not replace any existing pollution reduction effort by the City or other any eligible party.
Joint Applicant Information (if applicable)
See program guidelines for details on joint applicant applications and enter the details below. 625
PROJECT X
2025 Tier 1 Call for Projects Application for Funding
2025 Project X Tier 1 Application Page 12 of 12
Local Agency: N/A Local Agency: Click to enter text.
Project Manager: Click to enter text. Project Manager: Click to enter text.
Phone: Click to enter text. Phone: Click to enter text.
Email: Click to enter text. Email: Click to enter text.
Additional Comments
Click here to enter text.
I hereby certify that the information provided herein this form is accurate and consistent with accompanying documentation. I further certify that the above information has been approved by Council resolution and that awarded funds will not be used outside of their intended purpose.
Niki Beach
Name (Print) Signature Date
May 5, 2025
626
ATTACHMENTS
A. Calculations & Support Documentation for Question # 2 and # 3 B. Detailed Project Estimate & Warranty
C. Location Maps & Project Site Photos
D. Detailed Project Schedule
E. Design Drawings
F. City Council Resolution
G. Project Drainage Areas, Priority Land Uses, BMP Location & KMZ Files H. Vendor and Installer Qualifications
15 627
A. Calculations & Support Documentation
for Questions #2 and #3
16 628
OCTA ECP PROJECT X - CALCULATIONS for Questions #2 and #3 Support Documentation City of San Clemente
Type 1 Type 2
Type(s) of BMP(s) proposed
FULL CAPTURE
CPS-Mod™ &
GITS™ by G2
ARS-CL™ CurbOpening Screens
by G2
Number of each BMP type: 123 264
Total drainage area(s) contributing to each BMP Type: (Acres) 284.8 279.4 Total Drainage area(s) considered Priority Land Uses: (Acres) 284.8 279.4 284.8 Total Project Cost $705,000
Cost / Benefit ($/acres of priority land uses): $2,475
Project Score
Line Factor Points Multiplier Line Score
A Fractional percent of 1-yr, 1-hr event peak flowrate
treated by the BMP(s) 1.0 3 3
B Fractional percent of 85th percentile, 24-hr design event that is treated by the BMP(s) 1.5 3 4.5
C BMP Multiplier 0
Project Score: 7.5
Analysis for G2 Construction's CPS-Mod™,
GITS™, and ARS CL™ devices
2. Cost / Benefit Calculation for priority land uses treated by proposed BMP(s). *Per City General Plans for land use and Statewide Trash Provisions (high density residential, industrial, commercial, mixed urban, public transportation stations).
BMP(s)
3. Pollutant Reduction Benefit: Treatment capacity and BMP Type:
17629
OCTA ECP PROJECT X - CALCULATIONS for Questions #2 and #3 Support Documentation City of San Clemente
PROJECT SUMMARY
Land Use: Residential Medium-High Density, Industrial, & CommercialBMP: CPS-Mod™, GITS™, and ARS CL™ by G2 Construction, Inc. 123 FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM CPS-Mod™ or GITS™264 ARS-CL™ Curb-Opening Screens 284.8 Acres Total Drainage Area
284.8 Acres Priority Land Use Area
77.5% Land use impervious (est.)
Total project Cost:/ PLU Acre
PLU Land Use
Residential - Med-High DensityIndustrial - HeavyIndustrial - LightPublic ParkingCommercial Analysis for G2 Construction's CPS-Mod™, GITS™, and ARS CL™ devices $705,000
$2,475
18 630
OCTA ECP PROJECT X - CALCULATIONS for Questions #2 and #3 Support Documentation City of San Clemente Analysis for G2 Construction's CPS-Mod™, GITS™, and ARS CL™ devices
3.A. Fractional percent of 1-yr, 1-hr event peak flowrate treated by the BMPs: Mixed Flow/Volume BMPS BMP 1: FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM CPS-Mod™ & GITS™ by G2 BMP 2: ARS-CL™ Curb Opening Screens by G2 NOTE: ARS-CL filtration is in addition to Full Capture System filtration.
Criteria Value Unit Criteria Value Unit
C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 = 0.73125 C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 = 0.73125 i= 1-yr, 1hr intensity= 0.423 in/hr i= 1-yr, 1hr intensity= 0.423 in/hr Land Imperviousness 77.5% Land Imperviousness 77.5%
Acres 284.8 Acres 279.4
G2 Construction's CPS-Mod or GITS 123 screens G2 Construction's ARS-CL 264 screens A= Avg/ contrib. DA per CPS= 2.3 ac A= Avg/ contrib. DA per ARS screen= 1.1 ac Avg. 1-yr, 1-hr peak flowrate (Q) = 0.7 cfs Avg. 1-yr, 1-hr peak flowrate (Q) = 0.3 cfs CPS-Mod & GITS design flowrate average this project 5.2 cfs G2 ARS-CL design flowrate average this project 1.45 cfs Fractional percent of 1-yr, 1-hr event filtered by BMP (Calc). Max= 100% 727% Fractional percent of 1-yr, 1-hr event filtered by BMP (Calc). Max= 100% 443% Score (Max=1.0) = Score (Max=1.0) =
Q3.A Weighted Score:
All calculations based on OCTA Workshop presentation.
1 1
1 19
631
OCTA ECP PROJECT X - CALCULATIONS for Questions #2 and #3 Support Documentation City of San Clemente Analysis for G2 Construction's CPS-Mod™, GITS™, and ARS CL™ devices
3.B. Fractional percent of 85th percentile, 24-hr design event that is treated by the BMP Calculate the design flowrate equivalent to design volume:BMP 1: FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM CPS-Mod™ & GITS™ by G2 BMP 2: ARS-CL™ Curb Opening Screens by G2 NOTE: ARS-CL filtration is in addition to CPS-Mod filtration. Always in combo.
Criteria Value Unit Criteria Value Unit
C= (0.75 x imp) +.15 = 0.73125 C= (0.75 x imp) +.15 = 0.73125 i= equivalent BMP design intensity= 0.26 in/hr i= equivalent BMP design intensity= 0.26 in/hr Land Imperviousness 77.5% Land Imperviousness 77.5%
A= 284.8 ac A= 279.4 ac
Design Storm Flowrate (Q) = 54 cfs Design Storm Flowrate (Q) = 53 cfs G2 CPS-Mod & GITS design flowrate avg this project 5.2 cfs G2 ARS-CL design flowrate average this project 1.45 cfs Total FCS design flowrate (from manufacturer)= 641 cfs Total ARS-CL design flowrate (from manufacturer)= 383 cfs Fractional percent of 85th percentile, 24 hr event, that could be treated. 1183% cfs Fractional percent of 85th percentile, 24 hr event, that could be treated. 721% cfs Max Available Points Max Available PointsAll calculations based on OCTA Workshop presentation.
1.5 1.5
20 632
OCTA ECP PROJECT X - CALCULATIONS for Questions #2 and #3 Support Documentation City of San Clemente
3.A. Precipitation Intensity
Precipitation Intensity "i": 0.423 (0.355-0.507)
Source: NOAA Precip Frequency Estimates: CA
3.B. Design Storm Depth
Design Capture Storm Depth = .85"
Source:
Use multiplier to calculate the design storm intensity equivalent to the design storm depth:
Time of Concentration (Tc)
5 Min Modeled for High Intensity
Tc Multiplier 0.26 in/hrFraction of design storm entering the BMP 100% Equivalent BMP Design Intensity 0.26 in/hr
Analysis for G2 Construction's CPS-Mod™, GITS™, and ARS CL™ devices
3.B. Fractional percent of 85th percentile, 24-hr design event that is treated by the BMP 21 633
B. Detailed Project Estimate & Warranty
22 634
Lic. #801253 - A, C8, C60
1352 E. Borchard Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
714.748.4242
Customer: City of San Clemente Date: 4/30/2025
910 Calle Negocio Quote No 250430-SC
San Clemente, CA 92673
Eric H. Taylor
Contacts: Niki Beach By: Eric H. Taylor
949.361.8354 VP, Bus Dev, G2 Construction, Inc.
[email protected] 714.679.2550
[email protected]
Products: G2 CPS-Mod™ patented connector pipe screen, 304 stainless steel, custom fab & install G2 GITS™ grated inlet trash screen, 304 stainless steel, custom fab & install G2 ARS-CL™ patented curb-opening screens, 304 stainless steel, custom fab & install Count
City
SWINL #
Land Use
Street Name Nearest X-Street Lat Long
Grates
Traffic
ControlG2 BMP 1: Full
Capture
System
G2 BMP 2:
Curb-Opening
Screen
ARS-CL™
Screens
1 10458 PLU Camino De Los Mares Portico Del Sur 33.46792 -117.6360 4 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 2 10457 PLU Portico Del Sur Camino De Los
Mares 33.46795 -117.6362 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2
3 10456 PLU Portico Del Sur Camino De Los
Mares 33.46792 -117.6363 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2
4 10453 PLU Portico Del Sur Camino De Los
Mares 33.46897 -117.6367 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2
OCTA ECP Tier 1 Grant Application '25-26
DBE, MBE & SBE Certified
QUOTE
City of San Clemente
CPS-Mod ™, GITS™, and/or ARS-CL™ for 123 PLU Catch Basins Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente
Industrial Runoff Treatment Project
G2 will install 123 Full Capture Systems and 264 unique ARS-CL™ screens. Costs for required traffic control and catch basin cleaning are included.
OCPW / OCTA Master Agreement for Trash and Debris Capture Devices (Good until for 180 Days)
DESCRIPTION
G2 Construction (G2) proposes to custom fabricate and install our patented devices in 123 City catch basins (CBs).
The installed Full Capture System device counts are 119 CPS-Mod™ connector pipe screens and 4 GITS™ grated inlet trash screens systems. G2 will also fabricate and install 264 ARS-CL™ curb-opening screens in 119 of these City catch basins.
All 123 locations are in priority land use (PLU) areas: Residential Medium-High Density and Industrial primarily, and also Public Facilities.
This proposal utilizes the G2's master purchase agreement with OCPW / OCTA Master Agreement for Trash and Debris Capture Devices for the City of San Clemente's OCTA ECP Project X grant application for 2025-26. The City is eligible for this piggyback contract like all Orange County cities, which guarantees the best product, service, and pricing. 1 of 5 23635
5 10452 PLU Calle Portada Portico Del Sur 33.46898 -117.6365 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 6 12792 PLU Calle Mandarina Calle Portada 33.46890 -117.6362 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 7 10455 PLU Calle Vecino Calle Mandarina 33.46820 -117.6357 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 8 10454 PLU Calle Vecino Calle Mandarina 33.46815 -117.6356 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 9 10450 PLU Calle Clasico Calle Carmelita 33.46886 -117.6356 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 10 10451 PLU Calle Clasico Calle Carmelita 33.46881 -117.6359 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 11 10441 PLU Avenida Fortuna Portico Del Sur 33.46978 -117.6372 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 12 10442 PLU Avenida Fortuna Portico Del Sur 33.46989 -117.6373 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 13 10443 PLU Avenida Fortuna Portico Del Sur 33.46954 -117.6377 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 14 10444 PLU Avenida Fortuna Portico Del Sur 33.46923 -117.6378 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 15 10445 PLU Calle Prospero Avenida Fortuna 33.46936 -117.6376 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 16 10446 PLU Calle Prospero Avenida Fortuna 33.46925 -117.6376 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 17 10447 PLU Calle Prospero Avenida Fortuna 33.46873 -117.6374 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 18 10448 PLU Calle Prospero Avenida Fortuna 33.46870 -117.6373 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 19 10157 PLU Avenida Fortuna Portico Del Sur 33.46873 -117.6381 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 20 10158 PLU Avenida Fortuna Portico Del Sur 33.46838 -117.6382 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 21 10438 PLU Portico Del Sur Avenida Fortuna 33.47001 -117.6371 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 22 10439 PLU Portico Del Sur Avenida Fortuna 33.47012 -117.6371 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 23 10397 PLU Portico Del Sur Roberto 33.47125 -117.6364 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 24 12973 PLU Rosalinda Felipe 33.47046 -117.6362 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 25 12974 PLU Rosalinda Felipe 33.47035 -117.6362 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 26 10383 PLU Portico Del Sur Sombreado 33.47204 -117.6361 3 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 27 10384 PLU Portico Del Sur Sombreado 33.47200 -117.6360 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 28 10381 PLU Portico Del Sur Estampida 33.47444 -117.6363 3 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 29 10382 PLU Portico Del Sur Estampida 33.47445 -117.6362 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 30 10379 PLU Estampida Portico Del Sur 33.47437 -117.6360 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -21x 6 31 10380 PLU Estampida Portico Del Sur 33.47426 -117.6360 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 32 10459 PLU Camino De Los Mares Portico Del Sur 33.46760 -117.6361 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 33 10465 PLU Camino De Los Mares Camino Vera Cruz 33.46926 -117.6334 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 34 10463 PLU Camino Vera Cruz Camino De Los
Mares 33.46928 -117.6335 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2
35 10464 PLU Camino Vera Cruz Camino De Los
Mares 33.46919 -117.6337 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2
36 10460 PLU Domador Camino Vera Cruz 33.46948 -117.6338 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 37 10462 PLU Domador Camino Vera Cruz 33.46978 -117.6332 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 38 10461 PLU Domador Camino Vera Cruz 33.46985 -117.6329 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 39 10489 PLU Camino Vera Cruz Camino De Los
Mares 33.46883 -117.6334 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1
2 of 5 24636
40 10488 PLU Camino Vera Cruz Camino De Los
Mares 33.46897 -117.6332 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1
41 10485 PLU Camino Vera Cruz Las Posas 33.46852 -117.6328 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 42 10486 PLU Las Posas Camino Vera Cruz 33.46881 -117.6328 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 43 10487 PLU Las Posas Camino Vera Cruz 33.46862 -117.6327 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 44 10483 PLU Calle Emilia Estancia 33.47006 -117.6302 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 45 10484 PLU Calle Emilia Estancia 33.47011 -117.6303 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 46 10430 PLU Camino De Los Mares Estancia 33.47110 -117.6300 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 47 10421 PLU Estancia Camino De Los
Mares 33.47119 -117.6303 1 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2
48 10422 PLU Estancia Camino De Los
Mares 33.47127 -117.6302 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2
49 10211 PLU Camino De Los Mares Ave. Vaquero 33.45728 -117.6440 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 50 10213 PLU Calle Campana Camino De Los
Mares 33.45655 -117.6451 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1
51 10215 PLU Calle Campana Camino De Los
Mares 33.45644 -117.6452 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4
52 10214 PLU Calle Campana Camino De Los
Mares 33.45612 -117.6452 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1
53 10623 PLU Calle Frontera Ave. Vista Hermosa 33.44666 -117.6288 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 54 10625 PLU Calle Frontera Ave. Vista Hermosa 33.44712 -117.6293 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 55 10626 PLU Calle Frontera Camino Faro 33.44753 -117.6309 1 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 56 10627 PLU Camino Faro Calle Frontera 33.44779 -117.6306 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 57 10579 PLU Camino Faro Calle Frontera 33.44819 -117.6305 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 58 10578 PLU Camino Faro Calle Frontera 33.44836 -117.6302 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 59 10575 PLU Calle Balandra Camino Faro 33.44868 -117.6299 1 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 60 10574 PLU Camino Faro Calle Balandra 33.44901 -117.6300 1 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 61 10573 PLU Camino Faro Calle Balandra 33.44904 -117.6298 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 62 10572 PLU Via Chalupa Camino Faro 33.44947 -117.6293 1 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 63 10571 PLU Camino Faro Via Chalupa 33.44959 -117.6293 1 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 64 10570 PLU Camino Faro Via Chalupa 33.44974 -117.6292 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 65 10568 PLU Camino Faro Calle Almirante 33.44988 -117.6284 1 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 66 10566 PLU Calle Almirante Camino Faro 33.44970 -117.6282 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 67 10569 PLU Calle Almirante Camino Faro 33.44997 -117.6281 1 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 68 10567 PLU Camino Faro Calle Almirante 33.44977 -117.6280 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 69 10565 PLU Camino Faro Calle Almirante 33.44984 -117.6278 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 70 13154 PLU Avenida Vista Hermosa Camino Faro 33.44982 -117.6270 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 71 10564 PLU Avenida Vista Hermosa Camino Faro 33.44975 -117.6267 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 72 10618 PLU Avenida Vista Hermosa Calle Frontera 33.44791 -117.6279 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 73 10620 PLU Avenida Vista Hermosa Calle Frontera 33.44772 -117.6277 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 74 11499 PLU Avenida Presidio I-5 Frwy 33.42744 -117.6101 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 3 of 5 25637
75 11500 PLU Avenida Presidio I-5 Frwy 33.42731 -117.6099 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 76 11521 PLU Vista Encanta N. La Esperanza 33.42598 -117.6087 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 77 11520 PLU Vista Del Ponto S. La Esperanza 33.42630 -117.6084 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 78 11519 PLU S. La Esperanza Vista Del Ponto 33.42644 -117.6080 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 79 11518 PLU S. La Esperanza Vista Del Ponto 33.42649 -117.6079 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 80 11549 PLU Vista Encanta Vista Del Ponto 33.42390 -117.6076 1 TC GITS™ NA- no curb opening 81 11547 PLU Vista Del Ponto Vista Encanto 33.42430 -117.6072 1 TC GITS™ NA- no curb opening 82 11546 PLU Calle Patricia S. La Esperanza 33.42460 -117.6068 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 83 11545 PLU Calle Patricia S. La Esperanza 33.42466 -117.6067 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 84 11934 PLU Avenida San Pablo Ave. Acapulco 33.41512 -117.5947 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 85 11927 PLU Avenida San Pablo Calle Cuervo 33.41833 -117.5946 2 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 86 11921 PLU Avenida San Pablo Calle Cuervo 33.41760 -117.5946 2 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 87 11930 PLU Avenida San Pablo Calle Cuervo 33.41593 -117.5946 2 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 88 11931 PLU Avenida San Pablo Calle Cuervo 33.41630 -117.5946 1 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 89 11920 PLU Calle Cuervo Ave. San Pablo 33.41783 -117.5945 3 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 90 11932 PLU Calle Cuervo Ave. San Pablo 33.41617 -117.5943 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 91 11933 PLU Calle Cuervo Ave. San Pablo 33.41608 -117.5943 2 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 92 12273 PLU Avenida Acapulco Ave. Adobe 33.41635 -117.5908 2 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 93 12274 PLU Avenida Acapulco Ave. Adobe 33.41622 -117.5908 3 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 94 12275 PLU Avenida Acapulco Ave. Adobe 33.41557 -117.5924 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 95 12276 PLU Avenida Acapulco Ave. Adobe 33.41547 -117.5924 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 96 11996 PLU Avenida Acapulco Ave. Adobe 33.41522 -117.5932 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 97 11937 PLU Avenida Adobe Ave. Acapulco 33.41505 -117.5931 2 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 98 11938 PLU Avenida Adobe Ave. Acapulco 33.41500 -117.5932 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 99 12277 PLU Avenida Baja Ave. Adobe 33.41487 -117.5915 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 100 12278 PLU Avenida Baja Ave. Adobe 33.41487 -117.5916 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 101 12282 PLU Avenida Adobe Ave. Baja 33.41304 -117.5900 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 102 12281 PLU Avenida Adobe Ave. Baja 33.41276 -117.5902 2 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 103 12286 PLU Avenida Adobe Calle Bahia 33.41242 -117.5915 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 104 12287 PLU Avenida Adobe Calle Bahia 33.41235 -117.5915 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 105 12201 PLU Avenida La Pata Calle Iglesia 33.44793 -117.5870 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 106 13571 PLU Avenida La Pata Calle Iglesia 33.44745 -117.5869 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 107 12203 PLU Avenida La Pata Steed Memorial Park 33.44644 -117.5857 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 108 13640 PLU Avenida La Pata Steed Memorial Park 33.44602 -117.5855 1 GITS™ (2x) NA- no curb opening 109 12204 PLU Steed Memorial Park Ave. La Pata 33.44575 -117.5843 1 TC GITS™ NA- no curb opening 4 of 5 26638
110 12205 PLU Steed Memorial Park Ave. La Pata 33.44568 -117.5843 4 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 111 12206 PLU Avenida La Pata Calle Extremo 33.44608 -117.5833 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 112 12207 PLU Avenida La Pata Calle Extremo 33.44594 -117.5833 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 113 12305 PLU Avenida La Pata Calle Extremo 33.44601 -117.5815 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 114 12306 PLU Calle Extremo Ave. La Pata 33.44545 -117.5814 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 115 12307 PLU Calle Extremo Ave. La Pata 33.44542 -117.5815 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 116 12309 PLU Calle Extremo Avenida Fabricante 33.44354 -117.5815 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 117 12310 PLU Calle Extremo Avenida Fabricante 33.44353 -117.5814 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 118 12311 PLU Calle Extremo Avenida Fabricante 33.43919 -117.5826 CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -05 1 119 13419 PLU Avenida Fabricante Calle Extremo 33.44230 -117.5844 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -07 2 120 12238 PLU Avenida Fabricante Calle Extremo 33.44117 -117.5841 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -21x 6 121 12237 PLU Avenida Fabricante Calle Extremo 33.44122 -117.5840 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -21x 6 122 12312 PLU Avenida Fabricante Calle Extremo 33.44027 -117.5826 1 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -10 2 123 12313 PLU Avenida Fabricante Calle Extremo 33.44034 -117.5826 TC CPS-Mod™ ARS-CL™ -14x 4 DEVICES with Installation & CB Prep $622,748
Product Install Totals: Discounts (Quantity 101+ CBs) -$7,746 119 CPS-Mod™ Full Capture Systems Catch Basin & Inlet Cleaning $9,840 4 GITS™ Full Capture Systems Traffic Control $27,400
264 ARS-CL™ Screens Mobilization $35,000
Project Bonds $17,758
SUB-TOTAL $705,000
Contingency $0
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST : $705,000
Terms & Conditions:
Pricing based on OCPW/ OCTA Master Pricing with Volume Discounts.
Pricing does not include project licence or business fees.
Final design configurations and costs to be revised after final field evaluations.
Payment NET 30 days.
Thank You. We Appreciate Your Business!
5 of 5 27639
Lic. #801253 - A, C8, C60
1352 E. Borchard Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
714.748.4242
[email protected]
Date: April 24, 2025
CPS-Mod™, ARS-CL™ & GITS™
WARRANTY
Project: San Clemente - CPS-Mod™, ARS-CL™, & & GITS™ Screens City of San Clemente 2025-26 OCTA Measure M2’s Environmental Cleanup Program (ECP) Tier 1 – Project X
G2 Construction, Inc. hereby provides a product warranty of 10 years for the G2 CPS-Mod™ connector pipe screens, GITS™ grated inlet trash screen, and ARS-CL™ automatic retractable screens installed in catch basins for the project listed above. G2 guarantees the CPS-Mod™, GITS™, and ARS-CL™ will be manufactured and installed in accordance with the product drawings and specifications.
G2 Construction agrees to repair or replace any installed product that proves defective in its workmanship or material within one year of the project acceptance date. If an installed product proves defective within ten years, then G2 agrees to provide replacement parts at no cost.
Accidents, product modifications, vandalism, unusual use, or lack of standard cleaning may nullify a product’s warranty.
Requests for warranty service must be made by the product Owner, and should include photos and details.
John Alvarado, President
G2 Construction, Inc.
28 640
C. Location Maps & Project Site Photos
29 641
City of San Clemente
Project Sub-Map Areas
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 30 642
City of San Clemente PLU Map
Phase 5 – 2025
Inland Residential and Rancho San
Clemente Industrial Runoff
Treatment Project
31 643
City of San Clemente
Project Overview Map
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 1 2
3 4
5 6
32 644
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #1
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 33 645
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #1 Drainage
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 34 646
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #2
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 35 647
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #2 Drainage
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 36 648
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #3
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 37 649
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #3 Drainage
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 38 650
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #4
Median-High Density Res., Public, & Commercial
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 39 651
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #4 Drainage
Median-High Density Res., Public, & Commercial
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 40 652
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #5
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 41 653
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #5 Drainage
Medium-High Density Residential
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 42 654
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #6
Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 43 655
City of San Clemente
PLU Sub-Area #6 Drainage
Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
The proposed project’s specific catch basins receiving devices. 44 656
City of San Clemente
WATERSHED MAP
Inland Residential & Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project
A depiction of the City’s three largest watersheds, along with several smaller “Coastal Canyons,” is pictured below.
The proposed project is focused on capturing trash primarily from:
(1) the upper Prima Deshecha Canada Watershed from about 3 miles to 1 mile inland from the Pacific Ocean. The Camino de los Mares corridor connects with I-5 just downstream of this part of the project. (2) the San Clemente Coastal Canyons Watershed includes mostly natural canyons that collect drainage from the City’s center, including parts of the El Camino Real Corridor. (3) the San Mateo Creek Watershed, which is arguably the largest mostly undeveloped watershed south of Los Angeles, and accepts runoff from parts of the southernmost residential and all of the Rancho San Clemente Industrial Park near the City’s southeastern boundary.
45 657
PHOTOS of Catch Basins CITY of SAN CLEMENTE OCTA 2025 Project X CB ID# 10458 Camino De Los Mares North side East of Portico Del Sur CB ID# 10457 Portico Del Sur East side North of Camino De Los Mares CB ID# 10456 Portico Del Sur West side North of Camino De Los Mares CB ID# 10453 Portico Del Sur East side North of Camino De Los Mares 46 658
CB ID# 10452 Calle Portada North side East of Portico Del Sur CB ID# 12792 Calle Mandarina East side South of Calle Portada CB ID# 10455 Calle Vecino North side East of Calle Mandarina CB ID# 10454 Calle Vecino South side East of Calle Mandarina 47 659
CB ID# 10450 Calle Clasico East side West of Calle Carmelita CB ID# 10451 Calle Clasico West side West of Calle Carmelita CB ID# 10441 Avenida Fortuna South side West of Portico Del Sur CB ID# 10442 Avenida Fortuna North side West of Portico Del Sur 48 660
CB ID# 10438 Portico Del Sur West side North of Avenida Fortuna CB ID# 10439 Portico Del Sur West side North of Avenida Fortuna CB ID# 10397 Portico Del Sur East side North of Roberto CB ID# 12973 Rosalinda North side South of Felipe
49 661
PHOTOS of Catch Basins CITY of SAN CLEMENTE OCTA 2025 Project X CB ID# 12974 Rosalinda South side South of Felipe
CB ID# 10383 Portico Del Sur West side North of Sombreado CB ID# 10384 Portico Del Sur East side North of Sombreado CB ID# 10381 Portico Del Sur West side North of Estampida 50 662
CB ID# 10382 Portico Del Sur East side North of Estampida CB ID# 10379 Estampida North side East of Portico Del Sur CB ID# 10380 Estampida South side East of Portico Del Sur CB ID# 10459 Camino De Los Mares South side at Portico Del Sur 51 663
CB ID# 10465 Camino De Los Mares North side East of Camino Vera Cruz CB ID# 10463 Camino Vera Cruz East side North of Camino De Los Mares CB ID# 10464 Camino Vera Cruz West side North of Camino De Los Mares CB ID# 10460 Domador North side at Camino Vera Cruz
52 664
PHOTOS of Catch Basins CITY of SAN CLEMENTE OCTA 2025 Project X CB ID# 10462 Domador North side East of Camino Vera Cruz CB ID# 10461 Domador South side East of Camino Vera Cruz CB ID# 10489 Camino Vera Cruz West side South of Camino De Los Mares CB ID# 10488 Camino Vera Cruz East side South of Camino De Los Mares 53 665
CB ID# 10485 Camino Vera Cruz East side South of Las Posas CB ID# 10430 Camino De Los Mares South side East of Estancia CB ID# 10421 Estancia West side North of Camino De Los Mares CB ID# 10422 Estancia East side North of Camino De Los Mares 54 666
CB ID# 10213 Calle Campana East side South of Camino De Los Mares CB ID# 10215 Calle Campana West side South of Camino De Los Mares CB ID# 10214 Calle Campana West side South of Camino De Los Mares CB ID# 10211 Camino De Los Mares East side South of Ave. Vaquero 55 667
PHOTOS of Catch Basins CITY of SAN CLEMENTE OCTA 2025 Project X CB ID# 10623 Calle Frontera East side South of Ave. Vista Hermosa CB ID# 10625 Calle Frontera North side West of Ave. Vista Hermosa CB ID# 10626 Calle Frontera South side West of Camino Faro CB ID# 10627 Camino Faro East side North of Calle Frontera 56 668
CB ID# 10579 Camino Faro West side North of Calle Frontera CB ID# 10578 Camino Faro East side North of Calle Frontera CB ID# 10575 Calle Balandra South side East of Camino Faro CB ID# 10574 Camino Faro West side North of Calle Balandra 57 669
CB ID# 10573 Camino Faro East side North of Calle Balandra CB ID# 10572 Via Chalupa North side East of Camino Faro CB ID# 10571 Camino Faro East side North of Via Chalupa CB ID# 10570 Camino Faro West side North of Via Chalupa 58 670
CB ID# 10568 Camino Faro North side West of Calle Almirante CB ID# 10566 Calle Almirante East side South of Camino Faro CB ID# 10569 Calle Almirante East side North of Camino Faro CB ID# 10567 Camino Faro South side East of Calle Almirante 59 671
PHOTOS of Catch Basins CITY of SAN CLEMENTE OCTA 2025 Project X CB ID# 10565 Camino Faro North side East of Calle Almirante CB ID# 13154 Avenida Vista Hermosa West side North of Camino Faro CB ID# 10564 Avenida Vista Hermosa East side North of Camino Faro 60 672
CB ID# 10618 Avenida Vista Hermosa West side North of Calle Frontera CB ID# 10620 Avenida Vista Hermosa East side North of Calle Frontera 61 673
PHOTOS of Catch Basins CITY of SAN CLEMENTE OCTA 2025 Project X CB ID# 11499 Avenida Presidio North side East of I-5 Frwy CB ID# 11500 Avenida Presidio South side East of I-5 Frwy CB ID# 11521 Vista Encanta East side South of N. La Esperanza 62 674
CB ID# 11520 Vista Del Ponto East side South of S. La Esperanza CB ID# 11519 S. La Esperanza West side South of Vista Del Ponto CB ID# 11518 S. La Esperanza East side South of Vista Del Ponto CB ID# 11549 Vista Encanta South side West of Vista Del Ponto 63 675
CB ID# 11547 Vista Del Ponto East side East of Vista Encanto CB ID# 11546 Calle Patricia West side South of S. La Esperanza CB ID# 11545 Calle Patricia East side South of S. La Esperanza 64 676
PHOTOS of Catch Basins CITY of SAN CLEMENTE OCTA 2025 Project X CB ID# 11934 Avenida San Pablo East side North of Ave. Acapulco
CB ID# 11927 Avenida San Pablo East side North of Calle Cuervo CB ID# 11921 Avenida San Pablo East side South of Calle Cuervo CB ID# 11930 Avenida San Pablo East side South of Calle Cuervo 65 677
CB ID# 11931 Avenida San Pablo East side North of Calle Cuervo
CB ID# 11920 Calle Cuervo North side East of Ave. San Pablo
CB ID# 11932 Calle Cuervo North side East of Ave. San Pablo
CB ID# 11933 Calle Cuervo South side East of Ave. San Pablo 66 678
CB ID# 12273 Avenida Acapulco North side West of Ave. Adobe CB ID# 12274 Avenida Acapulco South side West of Ave. Adobe CB ID# 12275 Avenida Acapulco North side East of Ave. Adobe CB ID# 12276 Avenida Acapulco South side East of Ave. Adobe 67 679
PHOTOS of Catch Basins CITY of SAN CLEMENTE OCTA 2025 Project X CB ID# 11996 Avenida Acapulco North side at Ave. Adobe
CB ID# 11937 Avenida Adobe East side South of Ave. Acapulco CB ID# 11938 Avenida Adobe West side South of Ave. Acapulco CB ID# 12277 Avenida Baja East side West of Ave. Adobe
68 680
CB ID# 12278 Avenida Baja West side West of Ave. Adobe
CB ID# 12282 Avenida Adobe West side South of Ave. Baja CB ID# 12281 Avenida Adobe East side South of Ave. Baja
69 681
CB ID# 12286 Avenida Adobe North side East of Calle Bahia CB ID# 12287 Avenida Adobe South side East of Calle Bahia 70 682
PHOTOS of Catch Basins CITY of SAN CLEMENTE OCTA 2025 Project X CB ID# 12201 Avenida La Pata North side East of Calle Iglesia CB ID# 13571 Avenida La Pata South side East of Calle Iglesia CB ID# 12203 Avenida La Pata North-Median West of Steed Memorial Park CB ID# 13640 Avenida La Pata South side West of Steed Memorial Park 71 683
CB ID# 12204 Steed Memorial Park East side North of Ave. La Pata
CB ID# 12205 Steed Memorial Park East side North of Ave. La Pata
CB ID# 12206 Avenida La Pata North side West of Calle Extremo
CB ID# 12207 Avenida La Pata North-Median West of Calle Extremo
72 684
CB ID# 12305 Avenida La Pata West side North of Calle Extremo CB ID# 12306 Calle Extremo East side South of Ave. La Pata CB ID# 12307 Calle Extremo West side South of Ave. La Pata CB ID# 12309 Calle Extremo West side North of Avenida Fabricante 73 685
PHOTOS of Catch Basins CITY of SAN CLEMENTE OCTA 2025 Project X CB ID# 12310 Calle Extremo East side North of Avenida Fabricante CB ID# 13419 Avenida Fabricante South side West of Calle Extremo CB ID# 12238 Avenida Fabricante South side West of Calle Extremo 74 686
CB ID# 12237 Avenida Fabricante North side West of Calle Extremo CB ID# 12312 Avenida Fabricante South side West of Calle Extremo CB ID# 12313 Avenida Fabricante North side West of Calle Extremo 75 687
D. Detailed Project Schedule
76 688
City Council Approval of Resolution May 20, 2025
OCTA & City Agreement Letter Signed August 1, 2025
City Council Approval of Contract October 15, 2025
City Award of Contract to Contractor November 3, 2025
START - Contractor
Construction/Installation November 17, 2025
COMPLETION - Contractor
Construction/Installation January 28, 2026
DETAILED PROJECT SCHEDULE
OCTA ECP Project X 2025-26
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
77689
Lic. #801253 - A, C8, C60
1352 E. Borchard Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
714.748.4242
[email protected]
Installation Schedule
City of San Clemente
2025-26 OCTA ECP, Project X
April 30, 2025
Action Time (from signed
contract & NTP)
1. Evaluate all catch basins and take detailed
measurements.
4 weeks
2. Fabricate custom CPS-Mod™, GITS™ & ARS-CL™
3. Install custom fitted G2 Devices 8 weeks
4. Inspection and sign-off
TOTAL PROJECT (start to finish) 12 WEEKS
78 690
E. Design Drawings
79 691
CPS-Mod™
Patented
CPS Modular Series
CA State Water Board Certified - FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ G2 CPS-Mod™ Full-Capture 5mm perforated screens with
patented modular design for easy installation inside catch basins.
Approved by the California State Water Board, LACDPW, OCPW, OCTA, SF Bay RWQCB & agencies everywhere. The CPSMod™ prevents trash, pollutants, and debris from entering waterways through the catch basin outlet pipe.
x Made from 304 Stainless Steel for extended life.
x Sized to meet or exceed 1-year, 1-hour storm.
x Modular to easily fit all catch basin types.
x Custom designed and fabricated to each catch basin to ensure compliance of no gaps > 5mm in size.
x Professionally installed by G2 or a trained & certified installer. x Quick Release Removable (optional)
x Mosquito & Vector Abatement Deflector (where required) Recommended with G2’s ARS CamLock Series™
80 692
CPS-Mod™
Patented
CPS Modular Series
FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM Certified by
California State Water Board & Regional Water Quality Control Boards G2 CPS-Mod™ Connector Pipe Screen
Function:
x Captures all pollutants 5mm and larger that enter the catch basin. x Pollutants prevented from exiting the catch basin:
¾ Primary: plastics (food containers, bags, bottles, straws); trash (paper, cigarette butts, cans); vegetative debris (leaves, branches, landscaping); other all other objects. ¾ Secondary: pollutants absorbed by or attached to the Primary pollutants. Including from vehicles (hydrocarbons, fluids, copper, cadmium, zinc, tires, etc.), pathogens / bacteria, pesticides, nutrients, organic compounds, sediment toxicity, etc.
Design, Flexibility, & Approval:
x Custom designed and fabricated for each catch basin and its unique features. x Fits any standard catch basin with discharge pipe on front, back, or side wall. x Approved by State Waterboard, Los Angeles County DPW, City of LA, Orange County DPW, OCTA, San Francisco Bay Area Water Resource Board, and agencies everywhere.
Material & Fabrication:
x Made of 304 stainless steel; 14 gauge with 5mm holes. x “Made in California, USA”
Value:
x Low initial capital investment relative to other storm water quality BMPs. Lower long-term and total lifetime costs vs. any water quality BMP or taking no action. x Requires no replacement filters or parts.
x G2’s CPS-Mod™ in combination with the G2’s ARS-CL™ creates the most effective BMP system and greatest value.
Public Outreach:
x Residents aware of the CPS-Mod™ installed in their local catch basin perceive it to be an environmental benefit and demonstrates an environmentally conscious community.
Recommended with G2’s ARS CamLock Series™ screens, for the most complete full capture system. 81 693
CPS-Mod™
Patented
CPS Modular Series FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM
82 694
NOTES:
TOP DEFLECTOR, AS NEEDED
SUPPORT BRACKET WHEN A 48".
BOTTOM TRIM SIZED TO FIT, AS NEEDED,
SEE SHEET #3.
2 G2 Construction, Inc.
Connector Pipe Screen (CPS)
NOT TO SCALE
A
*Hb
*Hs
A*
B*
(typ)
*Hs/2
(typ)
*Hs/2
(typ)
Full Capture Model: G2 CPS - Modular
Patented
VI
A
5 mm Opening Screen 14 Gauge
A
*L = A
5 mm Opening Screen 14 Gauge
*L = A+2B
B (typ)
A
5 mm Opening Screen 14 Gauge
*L = A+B
B
3 3
1 2
1 Screen made of 304 Stainless Steel
14 gauge, with 5 mm openings.
Manufactured and Installed Exclusively by:
Office (714) 748- 4242
CA Lic. # 801253 A, C-8, C-60
G2 Construction, Inc. [email protected]
1352 E. Borchard Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92705
83 695
_
GITS™ Drop-In CPS
Grated Inlet Trash Screen
___________________________________________________________________________________________ State Water Board Certified
FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM
G2 GITS™ grated inlet trash screen is a Full Capture
System with 5mm perforations.
x Made from 304 Stainless Steel for extended life.
x Fits under any size inlet grate.
x Custom designed, fabricated & fitted to each grated
inlet. “Made in California, USA”
x Sized to meet or exceed 1-year, 1-hour storm*.
x Professionally installed by G2 or by the customer.
Recommended for grated inlets.
84 696
GITS™ Drop-In CPS
Grated Inlet Trash Screen
FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM Certified by the
CA State Water Board & Regional Water Quality Control Boards GITS™ Under Grate Trash Capture Device
Function:
x Captures all pollutants 5mm and larger that enter the inlet through the grate. x Meets CA State Water Board trash regulation Track 1 requirements. x Easy to install, clean and maintain.
x Pollutants prevented from exiting the inlet:
¾ Primary: plastics (food containers, bags, bottles, straws); trash (paper, cigarette butts, cans); vegetative debris (leaves, branches, landscaping); other all other objects. ¾ Secondary: pollutants absorbed by or attached to the Primary pollutants. Including from vehicles (hydrocarbons, fluids, copper, cadmium, zinc, tires, etc.), pathogens / bacteria, pesticides, nutrients, organic compounds, sediment toxicity, etc.
Design, Flexibility, & Approval:
x Custom designed and fabricated for each inlet and its unique features. Fits any grated inlet. x Approved by State Water Board, Orange County DPW, OCTA, and agencies everywhere.
Material & Fabrication:
x Made of 304 stainless steel; 14 gauge with 5mm holes. x “Made in California, USA”
Value:
x Low initial capital investment relative to other storm water quality BMPs. Lower long-term and total lifetime costs vs. any water quality BMP or taking no action. x Requires no replacement filters or parts.
Public Outreach:
x Residents aware of the GITS installed in their local grated inlet perceive it to be an environmental benefit and demonstrates an environmentally conscious community. 85 697
_____________________________________________________________________________________ [email protected] www.G2construction.com Santa Ana 714.748.4242 DBE, MBE & SBE Certified California
GITS™ Drop-In CPS
Grated Inlet Trash Screen
FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM Certified by the
CA State Water Board & Regional Water Quality Control Boards 86 698
18.00 End View Side View Top View
25.75 8.09 25.75
27.7523.75
10.00 3.50
3.50 10.09
8.09 17.75
39.00 .00
5.00 G2 Construction, Inc.
TM
GITS Full Capture System 3DWHQW3HQGLQJ
Grated Inlet Trash Screen Model :
18" x 40" with 10" Basket
1 4
1 1
2 3
3 Full Capture System for
Drop Inlets with grate
covers 18" x 40"
1 3
4 304 SS - 16 gauge Rim Assembly 304 SS 14 gauge, 5mm perforated material 304 SS solid round bar 18" dia. used to trim off
top of basket. Makes for no sharp edge. 2 304 SS Solid round bar 14" dia. , each baskets has 6 support members.
Manufactured and Installed Exclusively by:
Office (714) 748- 4242
CA Lic. # 801253 A, C-8, C-60
G2 Construction, Inc. [email protected]
1352 E. Borchard Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92705
6$03/('5$:,1*
87 699
88 700
ARS-CL™
Patented
ARS CamLock Series ___________________________________________________________________________________________ G2’s ARS-CL™ automatic retractable screen with CamLock
technology prevents trash and debris from entering catch basins through the curb opening. Approved by LACDPW,
OCTA, OCPW, SF Bay ABAG, and most agencies.
Approved for Trash Amendment TRACK 2 compliance.
Reduces catch basin cleaning costs and CPS maintenance.
Prevents up to 95% of trash and debris from entering the catch basin.
x Made from 304 Stainless Steel for extended life.
x Custom designed, fabricated & fitted to each curb
opening. “Made in California, USA”
x Independent ARS-CL™ devices open and lock between
all catch basin support bolts.
x Sized to meet or exceed 1-year, 1-hour storm*.
x Professionally installed by G2.
Recommended with G2’s CPS-Mod Series™
89 701
ARS-CL™
Patented
ARS CamLock Series _________________________________________________________________________________________ ARS-CL™ Automatic Retractable Screen
Function:
x Stops all pollutants ¾ inches and larger from entering catch basins and water systems. x Significantly reduces cleaning frequency for catch basins and CPS-Mod™ maintenance. x Pollutants prevented from entering the catch basin:
¾ Primary: plastics (food containers, bags, bottles); trash (paper, cigarette butts, cans); vegetative debris (leaves, branches, landscaping); other objects (balls, toys). ¾ Secondary: pollutants absorbed by or attached to the Primary pollutants. Including from vehicles (hydrocarbons, fluids, copper, cadmium, zinc, tires, etc.), pathogens / bacteria, pesticides, nutrients, organic compounds, sediment toxicity, etc.
x Automatically unlocks and opens during storm events to prevent street flooding. x Automatically re-locks in the closed position to prevent pollutant access. x Low maintenance. Prevents 85-95% of trash and debris from entering the catch basin.
Design, Flexibility, & Approval:
x Custom designed and fabricated for each catch basin’s curb opening. x Fits any standard curb-face catch basin opening.
x Approved by Los Angeles County DPW, City of LA, Orange County DPW, OCTA, San Francisco Bay Area Water Quality Board, Contra Costa County DPW, and Agencies nationally.
Material & Fabrication:
x 100% stainless steel device.
x Fabricated in Orange County. “Made in California, USA” Value:
x Significantly reduces catch basin cleaning requirements and costs. x Low initial capital investment relative to other storm water quality BMPs. Lower long-term and total lifetime costs vs. any water quality BMP or taking no action. x Requires no replacement filters or parts.
x Works in harmony with regular street sweeping programs.
Aesthetics & Environmentalism:
x Beautiful stainless steel devices add aesthetic value to streets and neighborhoods. x Residents perceive the ARS-CL™ to be an environmental benefit and demonstrates an environmentally conscious community.
Recommended with G2’s CPS-Mod Series™ screens, for the most complete full capture system. 90 702
ARS-CL™
Patented
ARS CamLock Series __________________________________________________________________________________________ 91 703
Device Filtered Flow Rate Calculation
What are the filtered flow rates for G2 Construction devices, and how are they determined? G2 Construction (G2) reports filtered flow rates based on hydrology modeling and testing with water flows.
Our design team applies the same formula used by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) to calculate filtered CFS (cubic feet per second) in their TECHNICAL REPORT on Connector Pipe Screen Design and Full Capture TMDL Compliance (April 2007). This technical report was submitted and approved by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board.
CPS-Mod ™ CFS Formula:
Where:
Qscreen= Max CFS filtered thru screen.
c = Coeficent of the screen orifice for friction & turbulence.
A = Area of the screen.
g = Gravity.
h = Differential head of upstream vs. downstream side of screen.
Using this formula, G2 calculates the filtered CFS for different designs, and with different assumptions. Catch basin discharge pipes are designed and sized to transport the area’s stormwater from the catch basin. G2 designs each CPS-Mod™ based on the size and location of the discharge pipe, and size and configuration of the catch basin.
In addition to modeling filtered CFS with formulas, G2 has tested our devices with flowing water.
Results found that actual flowing water CFS rates were 90-95% of the modeled formulas.
However, G2 realizes there are many factors that can reduce filtration rates not included in the formulas. We take a conservative approach by applying a size factor that calculates filtration rates for a smaller device that estimated, typically 85%. This provides a safety factor.
G2 knows there are real world variables that will reduce flow rates, and screen blockage is the most common issue. For that reason, G2 designs assume that a percentage of the screen will be blocked with trash or debris, and our designs typically assume between 10-30% of the screen cannot pass water. This directly reduces the assumed filtration rates.
Each of G2’s ARS-CL™ screens varies in curb opening width between 3.5’ to 5’, and is designed to unlock and open when 4” of water pools in front of the catch basin. The same formula is used to determine device filtered flow rates. Similarly, our designed filtered flow rates for the closed ARSCL™ screen assumes there is some screen blockage. LACDPW has performed hydrology tests on the ARS-CL™ at the San Gabriel dam test facility and has approved the design.
Device Filtered Flow Rate Testing with Water
G2’s devices have been testing using flowing water to simulate real-world conditions. Attached is a report of filtration testing performed on the patented CPS-Mod™. This test and the results were included in G2’s application to the State Waterboard that resulted in the certification of G2’s CPSMod™ and GITS™ devices as Full Capture Systems. 92 704
&ŝůƚĞƌĞĚ&ůŽǁZĂƚĞdĞƐƚŝŶŐͲ'ϮW^ͲDŽĚ:ĂŶ͘ϮϬϭϵ ϭ
),/7(5(')/2:5$7(7(67,1*
'HYLFH7HVWHG
*&RQVWUXFWLRQ±&360RG
)LOWHUHG)ORZUDWH
&)6
7HVWLQJIRU*&360RG
6XPPDU\
/DEWHVWLQJRI*&360RGZDVSHUIRUPHGWRGHWHUPLQHILOWHUHGIORZUDWHV &)6
LQD
VLPXODWHGLQKRXVHFDWFKEDVLQV\VWHP5HVXOWVVKRZHGWKDWDQDYHUDJHVL]HG*&36 VTIWVFUHHQ
ZLOOILOWHUPRUHWKDQ&)6RIZDWHUZKHQFOHDQ7KLVILOWHUHGIORZUDWHH[FHHGVWKHSHDNIORZUDWHRIWKH RQH\HDURQHKRXUVWRUPHYHQWIRUPRVWFDWFKEDVLQVZLWKGLVFKDUJHSLSHOHVVWKDQ´5HVXOWVDOVR VKRZHGWKDWZKHQRIWKHVFUHHQLVEORFNHGLWZLOOFRQWLQXHWRILOWHUDWOHDVW&)6 7KHSULPDU\OLPLWDWLRQRIWKHWHVWLQJZDVGXHWROLPLWHGVXSSO\RIZDWHU
JDOORQV
ZKLFKZDVUHF\FOHG
GXULQJWHVWLQJ)RUDOOWHVWVWKH*&36VXFFHVVIXOO\ILOWHUHGDOOZDWHUIORZVZLWKRXWRYHUIORZLQJWKH VFUHHQ,IKLJKHU&)6IORZUDWHVZHUHDYDLODEOHGXULQJWHVWLQJWKHQKLJKHUPD[LPXPILOWHUHGIORZUDWHV ZRXOGKDYHUHVXOWHG
0HWKRGRORJ\
*EXLOWDQLQKRXVHZDWHUIORZV\VWHPZLWKWKUHHFKDPEHUV
:DWHU6RXUFH&KDPEHUKROGVXSWRFXELFIHHWRIZDWHU
JDOORQV
7HVW&KDPEHULVDVLPXODWHGFDWFKEDVLQZKHUHWKHWHVWHG&36ZDVLQVWDOOHG 5HF\FOH7DQNFROOHFWVWHVWHGZDWHU
FXELFIW
JDO
ZKHUHLWLVSXPSHGEDFNXSWRWKH
VRXUFHFKDPEHU
7HVW&KDPEHU'LPHQVLRQV
7HVWHG*&360RGGHYLFH
7KLV&36ZDVWHVWHGXQGHUWZRVFHQDULRV
VFUHHQEORFNDJH
EORFNDJH7KHERWWRPRIWKHVFUHHQZDVWLJKWO\FRYHUHGZLWKLPSHUPHDEOHSODVWLF EDUULHU
93 705
&ŝůƚĞƌĞĚ&ůŽǁZĂƚĞdĞƐƚŝŶŐͲ'ϮW^ͲDŽĚ:ĂŶ͘ϮϬϭϵ Ϯ
)RUHDFKWHVWXSWRFXELFIHHWIORZHGIURPWKHZDWHUVRXUFHFKDPEHULQWRWKHWHVWFKDPEHUDQG WKURXJKWKH&36
7HVW5HVXOWV
,QDOOWHVWVFHQDULRVWKH*&36ILOWHUHGRIWKHZDWHUZLWKRXWZDWHUULVLQJDQGRYHUIORZLQJWKHVFUHHQ $QDO\VLV
7KH&36FRXOGKDYHILOWHUHGPRUHZDWHULILWZDVDYDLODEOHZLWKRXWRYHUIORZLQJ7KHWHVWHG* &36KDGDILOWHUHGIORZUDWHWKDWH[FHHGHG&)6SHUVTXDUHIRRWRIVFUHHQ &RQFOXVLRQ
7HVWLQJVKRZHGWKDW*¶V&36RIDYHUDJHVL]H
VTIWVFUHHQ
ILOWHUVZDWHULQH[FHVVRI
&)67KLVUDWHH[FHHGVWKHIXOOFDSWXUHUHTXLUHPHQWVRIPRVWFDWFKEDVLQVZLWKDGLVFKDUJHSLSHGLDPHWHU OHVVWKDQ´7KHSULPDU\OLPLWDWLRQRIWKLVWHVWZDVWKHLQDELOLW\WRVXSSO\KLJKHUZDWHUYROXPHVDQGIORZ UDWHV)XUWKHUWHVWLQJLVUHFRPPHQGHG
3KRWRVRI&)67HVWV
*&)67HVWHU
FKDPEHUV\VWHP
:DWHU6RXUFH&KDPEHU &)
*DOORQV
94 706
&ŝůƚĞƌĞĚ&ůŽǁZĂƚĞdĞƐƚŝŶŐͲ'ϮW^ͲDŽĚ:ĂŶ͘ϮϬϭϵ ϯ
6FHQDULR
%ORFNDJHRI6FUHHQ6FHQDULR %ORFNHGZLWKSODVWLF
%HIRUH7HVW
7HVW&KDPEHU'LVFKDUJH3LSH
'XULQJ7HVW
95 707
),/7(5(')/2:5$7(6/$%7(67**UDWHG,QOHW7UDVK6FUHHQ )LOWHUHG)ORZUDWH
&)6
7HVWLQJIRU**,76[
6XPPDU\
/DEWHVWLQJRIWKH**,76ZDVSHUIRUPHGWRGHWHUPLQHILOWHUHGIORZUDWHV &)6
LQDVLPXODWHGLQKRXVH
VWRUPZDWHULQOHW7KUHHVFHQDULRVZHUHWHVWHGXVLQJWKHVWDQGDUG**,76[
VTIWVFUHHQ
VFUHHQEORFNDJHVFUHHQEORFNDJHDQGVFUHHQEORFNDJH5HVXOWVVKRZHGWKDW &)6IORZUDWH
ZDVVXFFHVVIXOO\ILOWHUHGDFURVVRQDOOWHVWVDQGSURMHFWHGPD[LPXP&)6RIWKHXQEORFNHG*,76LV KLJKHUWKDQ&)67KLVLVDFRQVHUYDWLYHHVWLPDWH7KH*,76ILOWHUHGIORZUDWHVTXDOLI\LWDVDIXOO FDSWXUHV\VWHP
0HWKRGRORJ\
*EXLOWDQLQKRXVHZDWHUIORZV\VWHPWRVLPXODWHDVWRUPHYHQWIRUDJUDWHGLQOHW
:DWHU6RXUFH&KDPEHUKROGVXSWRFXELFIHHWRIZDWHU
JDOORQV
7HVW&KDPEHULVDVLPXODWHGLQOHWZKHUHWKHWHVWHG*,76ZDVLQVWDOOHG )RU7HVWWKH*,76WUDVKFROOHFWLRQEDVNHW¶VVFUHHQZDVFRPSOHWHO\RSHQ)RU7HVWDQGWKLFN ZDWHUSURRIWDSHZDVDSSOLHGWRERWKWKHLQVLGHDQGRXWVLGHRIWKHVFUHHQWRPDNHLWFRPSOHWHO\ LPSHUPHDEOH7HVW
EORFNDJH
ZDVFRQGXFWHGDIWHUWKH*,76ERWWRPZDVEORFNHGFRPSOHWHO\DQG DOOVLGHVZHUHZUDSSHGXSWRDKHLJKWRIWKHFROOHFWLRQEDVNHW7HVW EORFNDJH
ZDV
FRQGXFWHGDIWHUWKH*,76ERWWRPZDVEORFNHGFRPSOHWHO\DQGRIVLGHVZHUHZUDSSHGFRPSOHWHO\7KLV OHIWRQHVLGHRSHQ
RIWKHVFUHHQVXUIDFH
5HVXOWVDQG$QDO\VLV
7HVW
EORFNDJHZLWK
&)6ZDWHUIORZUHVXOWHGLQILOWUDWLRQWKURXJKWKHVFUHHQZLWKRXWRYHUIORZ :DWHUH[LWHGIURPWKHERWWRPDQGPLGGOHRIWKHVFUHHQEXWWKHXSSHUSRUWLRQRIWKHILOWUDWLRQEDVNHWZDVQRW XWLOL]HGLQGLFDWLQJWKHUHZDVPRUHFDSDFLW\,IKLJKHU&)6IORZUDWHVZHUHDYDLODEOHGXULQJWKLVWHVWWKHQ KLJKHUPD[LPXPILOWHUHGIORZUDWHVZRXOGKDYHUHVXOWHG 7KLV &)6ILOWHUHGIORZUDWHH[FHHGVWKHSHDN
IORZUDWHRIWKHRQH\HDURQHKRXUVWRUPHYHQWIRUPRVWLQOHWVZLWK´E\´JUDWHV 7HVW
EORFNDJHZLWK
&)6UHVXOWHGLQILOWUDWLRQWKURXJKWKHVFUHHQZLWKRXWRYHUIORZ7KH SURMHFWHGPD[LPXP&)6RIDQXQEORFNHG*,76EDVHGRQWKLVWHVWLV&)6 7HVW
EORFNDJHZLWK
&)6UHVXOWHGLQILOWUDWLRQWKURXJKWKHVFUHHQZLWKRXWRYHUIORZ7KH SURMHFWHGPD[LPXP&)6RIDQXQEORFNHG*,76EDVHGRQWKLVWHVWLV&)67KHILOWHUHGIORZUDWHRIWKLV WHVWH[FHHGHG&)6SHUVTXDUHIRRWRIVFUHHQ
&RQFOXVLRQ
7HVWLQJVKRZHGWKDW*¶V*,76[
VTIWVFUHHQ
VXFFHVVIXOO\ILOWHUVZDWHUIORZRI
&)63URMHFWHG
&)6H[FHHGV&)6
7HVW
DQGPD\UHDFK&)6
7HVW
7KH*,76ILOWHUHGIORZUDWHVTXDOLI\LWDVD
IXOOFDSWXUHV\VWHP7KHSULPDU\OLPLWDWLRQRIWKLVWHVWZDVWKHLQDELOLW\WRVXSSO\KLJKHUZDWHUYROXPHVDQG IORZUDWHV
96 708
*&)67HVW&KDPEHU
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 7(676
6FHQDULR
%ORFNDJHRI6FUHHQ
3UH7HVW6HWXS 'XULQJ7HVW
,PDJHDW0D[&)6 1R2YHUIORZ
2 97
709
6FHQDULR
%ORFNDJHRI6FUHHQ
7RSKDOIRSHQ
ERWWRPDQGKDOIRIVLGHVEORFNHG
3UH7HVW6HWXS 'XULQJ7HVW
,PDJHDW0D[&)6 1R2YHUIORZ
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6FHQDULR
%ORFNDJHRI6FUHHQ
)URQWVLGHRSHQ
VLGHVDQGERWWRPEORFNHG
3UH7HVW6HWXS 'XULQJ7HVW
,PDJHDW0D[&)6 1R2YHUIORZ
3 98
710
Catch Basin receiving ARS-CL™ and CPS-Mod™ FCS
ARS-CL CPS-Mod
w ARS
CB "W"
(ft)
ARS-CL
CB Count
Linear Feet (LF) of
Curb Opening
CPS-Mod
CB Count
Cubic Ft/
LF
Cubic Ft/
LF
Cubic Ft Trash/
Debris Captured
3.5 22 77 22 6 4 770
7 50 350 50 6 3 3,150
10 26 260 26 6 3 2,340
14 18 252 18 6 3 2,268
21 3 63 3 6 2.5 536
28 0 0 0 6 2 0
774.5
Linear Feet (LF) of
Curb Opening
Catch Basin drop-inlets receiving GITS™ FCS
Grate
Size CB Count SQFT of Grate
Opening
Cubic Ft Trash/
Debris Captured
40" x 24" 4 26.7 107
TOTAL 123 9,170
CB Count Cubic Ft Trash/ Debris
Captured per Year
Cubic Ft/ SQFT
4 Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente
Industrial Runoff Treatment Project 2025-26
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
TRASH & DEBRIS CAPTURE
Cubic Foot Estimate
ASSUMPTIONS
ASSUMPTIONS
99711
G2 Construction, Inc.
Full Capture System Devices
Device Device
Quantity
Device Filtration
SQFT (avg)
PROJECT
Filtration
Total SQFT
Design Flow
Rate Max per
Device
CPS-Mod 6.0 64 4.75 304 6.12
CPS-Mod 9.0 45 7.25 326.25 9.34
CPS-Mod 11.0 10 10 100 12.88
GITS 40x24 3 6.9 20.7 8.89
GITS 40x24 (double) 1 13.8 13.8 17.78
TOTALS 123 730.3
Weighted Average CFS 8.01
per Device (0% screen blockage)
Device Filter Size 5.94 SQFT (avg)
Device Max Filtration 8.01 CFS (avg)
Screen Blockage 35% (Max. anticipated blockage between CB Cleanings) (conservative option)
DESIGN FLOWRATE 5.21 CFS FILTERED (avg)
TOTAL DESIGN 640.4 CFS FILTERED
Curb-Opening Device Screens
Device Quantity Device Linear
Feet Total SQFT
Design Flow
Rate Max per
Device
ARS-CL Screens 264 3.5 924 1.45
TOTALS 264 924 1.45
DESIGN FLOWRATE 1.45 CFS (avg)
TOTAL DESIGN 382.8 CFS FILTERED
DESIGN FLOW
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial
Runoff Treatment Project 2025
100712
F. City Council Resolution Dra ft
(San Clemente City Council to
approve on May 20, 2025)
101
713
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN
APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP, TIER 1 GRANT
PROGRAM UNDER ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL
TRANSPORTATION ORIDANANCE NO. 3 FOR THE
INLAND RESIDENTIAL AND RANCHO SAN
CLEMENTE INDUSTRIAL RUNOFF TREATMENT
PROJECT
WHEREAS, Orange County Local Transportation Ordinance No.3, dated July 24, 2006, is known and cited as the Renewed Measure M Transportation Ordinance and Investment Plan and makes funds available through the Environmental Cleanup Program to help protect Orange County beaches and waterways from transportation-generated pollution (urban runoff) and improve overall water quality; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program consists of funding purchases and installation to catch basins with Best Management Practices, such as screens, filters, inserts, and other "street-scale" low flow diversion projects; and WHEREAS, OCTA has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente possesses authority to nominate water quality improvement projects that have a transportation pollution nexus to finance and construct the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, by formal action the City Council authorizes the nomination of the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project, including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizes the person identified as the official representative of the City of San Clemente to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required; and WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will maintain and operate the equipment acquired and installed; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will give OCTA's representatives access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the funded Tier 1 Grant Project; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will cause work on the project to be commenced within a reasonable time after receipt of notification from OCTA and that the 102
714
Resolution No. Page 2
project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence; and WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the American with Disabilities Act, and any other federal, state, and/or local laws, rules and/or regulations; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente must include all projects funded by Net Revenues in the seven-year Capital Improvement Program as part of the Renewed Measure M Ordinance eligibility requirement; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente authorizes a formal amendment to the seven-year Capital Improvement Program to add projects approved for funding upon approval from the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente will provide a minimum of 20% in matching funds for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project as required by the Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Clemente hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. The recitals above are true and correct and incorporated fully herein as findings.
SECTION 2. The application submitted on May 8, 2025 to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Project X Environmental Cleanup Program, Tier 1 Grant Program, for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project is hereby approved.
SECTION 3. The City Manager, or his designee, as the official representative of the City of San Clemente, is hereby authorized and directed to accept funds for the Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project from OCTA.
SECTION 4. The City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized and directed to agree to fund the City's share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount for the Inland Residential and Rancho San Clemente Industrial Runoff Treatment Project.
SECTION 5. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to take such other and further actions and execute and submit such documents as may be necessary and proper to accomplish the purposes of this resolution.
103
715
Resolution No. Page 3
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of May, 2025.
_______________________
Mayor of the City of
San Clemente, California
ATTEST:
__________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
104
716
Resolution No. Page 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) §
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, LAURA CAMPAGNOLO, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. _________ was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Clemente held on _______ day of April 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
_______________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
Approved as to form:
_____________________________
Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
105
717
G. Project Drainage Areas, Priority Land Uses,
BMP Location & KMZ Files
106
718
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2025
PROJECT DRAINAGE ACRES + IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
PRIORITY LAND USE (PLU) DRAINAGE AREAS
Drainage
Area
Area Name Drainage
Acres Land Use
Imperviousness
*
Imperv
Acres
1 1. PLU - Res Med Density 69.9 Residential HD (24du/acre) 74% 51.7 2 2. PLU - Res Med Density 12.5 Residential HD (24du/acre) 74% 9.3 3 3. PLU - Res Med Density 41.6 Residential HD (24du/acre) 74% 30.8
4.1 4.1 PLU - Res Med Density 27.0 Residential HD (24du/acre) 74% 20.0
4.2 4.2 PLU - Public Facility 4.0 Office - Public 88% 3.5
4.3 4.3 PLU - Commercial - Church 6.9 Commercial 88% 6.0 5 5. PLU - Res Med Density 64.2 Residential HD (24du/acre) 74% 47.5
6.1 6.1 PLU - Light Industrial 18.9 Industrial - Light 81% 15.3
6.2 6.2 PLU - Heavy Industrial 33.0 Industrial - Heavy 91% 30.0
6.3 6.3 PLU - Public Parking 6.9 Public Parking 95% 6.5 Total PLU Acres 284.8
TOTAL ACRES: 284.8 TOTAL IMPERV ACRES: 220.6
IMPERVIOUSNESS*: 77.5%
*Source: ISC
PLU TOTAL ACRES 284.80
Total Project Cost: $705,000
Cost Per PLU Acre: $2,475
107719
City of San Clemente
KMZ Files & Drainage
2 5 6
1 3
4 108
720
H. Vendor and Installer Qualifications
109
721
CREDENTIALS & QUALIFICATIONS
Background & Experience
G2 Construction started operations in Orange County in 2001 with strong foundations in welding, concrete construction, shop fabrication, and field work. The company began designing, fabricating, and installing catch basin curb opening automatic retractable screens (ARS) and full-capture connector pipe screens (CPS) and other stormwater protection devices for Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) and southern California municipalities in 2002.
Since then, G2 has fabricated and installed tens of thousands of approved catch basin inserts and screen covers on hundreds of stormwater projects in the Orange County and Los Angeles area. G2 offers complete solutions by performing project evaluation and consultation on stormwater devices and then designing, fabricating, and installing highly effective devices to meet and exceed specifications.
G2’s General Credentials
x Orange County Public Works (OCPW) and OCTA M2 Environmental Cleanup Program approved storm water quality devices:
o CPS-Mod™ patented Full Capture System approved by State Waterboard. o GITS™ grated inlet trash screen Full Capture System approved by State Waterboard.
o ARS-CL™ patented automatic retractable screen.
x OCPW ranks G2 Construction as their #1 stormwater device provider (2020 RFP & 2014 RFP). Awarded Master Purchase Agreements covering 2015 - 2025. x Los Angeles County Dept. of Public Works & City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation approved products: ARS-CL™& CPS-Mod™
x Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Approved products (all) x California Contractor Licenses: A (General Contractor), C-8 (Concrete), C60 (Welding) x Orange County Local Small Businss (OCLSB) certified. [see Attached] x Disadvantaged Business Entity (DBE) certified. [see Attached] x Minority Business Entity (MBE) certified. [see Attached] x Small Business Entity (SBE) certified.
110
722
G2’s Technical Expertise
G2 Construction is at the forefront of the stormwater device industry. G2 has designed and fabricated the most advanced stormwater protection devices to solve the needs of public agencies and private developers. Our advanced methodologies for fabrication and installation have made G2 the industry leader in providing custom-fitted stainless steel catch basin inserts and curb opening screen covers.
G2 has developed a high degree of technical expertise by incorporating all phases (evaluation, consulting, design, fabrication, installation, reporting) of stormwater projects, and learning from hundreds of installed projects over the years. We have become extremely familiar with all the procedures required for success.
Our depth of knowledge and technical experience has been the result of solving many dozens of challenges and constraints of projects over two decades. This includes, among many others, solving for all the various catch basin types and sizes and conditions that we face in the field.
We’ve learned something new from most projects and most clients. Our experiences with cities in Orange County and throughout southern California have been very good for many years.
Because many cities have developed an advanced knowledge of the industry and recognize quality and value, it makes G2’s work more effective, efficient, and valuable.
Fortunately, G2’s strong culture for project management helps us to organize projects effectively and manage diverse teams. This has enabled G2 to have a 100% rate of success for completing projects and within budget.
G2 provides its technical expertise and installation services throughout California and focuses on the Orange County and Los Angeles County regions.
Letters of Reference
G2’s customers provide additional insights into our qualifications. Attached are a few letters of our customer letters of recommendation.
111
723
CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
24035 El Toro Road •Laguna Hills, California 92653 • (949) 707-2600 • FAX (949) 707-2633 Website: www.LagunaHillsCA.gov
Feb. 3, 2025
Orange County Public Works
Procurement Services
601 North Ross Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
SUBJECT: City of Laguna Hills – Letter of Recommendation for G2 Construction, Inc.
TRASH AND DEBRIS CAPTURE DEVICES – RFP# 080-2736403-WH
To Whom It May Concern:
The City of Laguna Hills has contracted with G2 Construction (G2) since 2007 to design, fabricate, and install their ARS-CL and CPS-Mod trash and debris screens throughout the City. Between 2012 - 2024, G2 installed 11 annual City projects that won OCTA Environmental Cleanup Program’s Project X grant funds. They have installed over 2,000 ARS screens and 370 CPS devices in our catch basins.
The City continues to select G2 Construction because their devices successfully prevent trash, debris, and vegetation from entering our storm drain system and watershed. The City plans to work with G2 again this year to install our Phase XII OCTA grant.
For each project G2 has provided a simple end-to-end solution that includes field evaluations and measurements of catch basins, custom design and fabrication of their devices, installation, photos, support documentation, and warranty. G2’s work has always been on schedule, on budget, and performed without any problems.
G2 has also assisted the City with an inventory of catch basin devices, and provided information critical to our Project X applications.
I am pleased to offer this letter of recommendation for G2 Construction. The City finds their trash and debris devices to be very effective and of good value, and their installation work to be of high quality. The company has been very professional and dependable in their interactions with the City. We look forward to working with G2 Construction on future projects.
You may contact me with any questions at [email protected] or 949/707-2655.
Sincerely,
Joe Ames, P.E., T.E.
Public Works Director/City Engineer
Joe Ames, P.E., T.E
112
724
City of Mission Viejo
Public Works Department
200 Civic Center x Mission Viejo, California 92691 949/470-3056 http://www.cityofmissionviejo.org
Bob Ruesch
Mayor
Wendy Bucknum
Mayor Pro Tem
Brian Goodell
Councilmember
Trish Kelley
Councilmember
Cynthia Vasquez
Councilmember
January 17, 2025
Subject: G2 Construction
To Whom It May Concern:
G2 Construction has consistently provided quality services for the City of Mission Viejo since 2014 when it first installed Trash and Debris Capture Devices in Mission Viejo’s catch basins.
Since then, the City has contracted with G2 every year to install more G2 devices and will again in 2025.
G2 provides the Full Capture System CPS devices and ARS curb-opening screens the City prefers to prevent pollutants and debris from entering its storm drain systems. G2 is a full-service entity providing everything from field evaluations to custom device design, device fabrication, and installation. G2 is also instrumental in assisting the City with grant funding applications and the preparation of grant reimbursement requests.
G2 Construction is professional, experienced, expedient and reliable. Work is always performed quickly and efficiently and within budget.
They are a pleasure to work with and the City looks forward to many more projects with G2 Construction.
Regards,
MARK CHAGNON
City Of Mission Viejo
Director Of Public Works
113
725
CITY HALL 211 EIGHTH STREET
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90740
(562) 431-2527 • www.sealbeachca.gov
October 23, 2024
Orange County Public Works
Procurement Services
601 N. Ross Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
SUBJECT: TRASH AND DEBRIS CAPTURE DEVICES – REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL City of Seal Beach – Recommendation Letter
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter of recommendation is in response to Orange County Public Works’ Trash and Debris Capture Devices RFP. In my current capacity as the City of Seal Beach’s Public Works Director, I have had the pleasure of working with G2 Construction, Inc. (G2) for the installation of multiple capture devices.
OCPW’s master agreement in partnership with OCTA’s Environmental Cleanup Program has allowed many local agencies mitigate transportation-related pollutants. Through this, G2 has provided a seamless approach to successful project delivery, which I have no reservations recommending. The following is a recent list of services performed under my purview:
x 2023 Seal Beach CPS -Mod (170 systems) + ARS (48 screens) x 2020 Seal Beach CPS-Mod (53 systems) + ARS (95 screens) x 2019 Seal Beach CPS-Mod (55 systems) + ARS (127 screens) Should you have any questions regarding G2’s performance, please feel free to reach out at (562) 431- 2527, x1322 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Iris Lee
Director of Public Works
114
726
&,7<2))8//(5721
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 3XEOLF:RUNV'HSDUWPHQW±(QJLQHHULQJ'LYLVLRQ
7+(('8&$7,21&20081,7<
:HVW&RPPRQZHDOWK$YHQXH)XOOHUWRQ&DOLIRUQLD
ZZZFLW\RIIXOOHUWRQFRP
EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϳ͕ϮϬϮϰ
Z
͗ KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJDĞĂƐƵƌĞDϮ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůůĞĂŶƵƉdŝĞƌϭ'ƌĂŶƚ
WƌŽŐƌĂŵ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌϮϬϮϰͲϮϬϮϱ
ŝƚLJŽĨ&ƵůůĞƌƚŽŶͲ>ĞƚƚĞƌŽĨZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ
dŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ&ƵůůĞƌƚŽŶ;ŝƚLJͿŚĂƐǁŽƌŬĞĚǁŝƚŚ'ϮŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ/ŶĐ;'ϮͿŽŶĞǀĞƌLJKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJDĞĂƐƵƌĞDϮ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůůĞĂŶƵƉdŝĞƌϭ'ƌĂŶƚƚŚĞŝƚLJŚĂƐĂƉƉůŝĞĚƚŽƐŝŶĐĞ ϮϬϭϰ͘ƐƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐƉƌŝŵĂƌLJĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌĨŽƌŝŶƐƚĂůůŝŶŐƚŚĞĨƵůůĐĂƉƚƵƌĞƚƌĂƐŚĂŶĚĚĞďƌŝƐĚĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕'ϮŚĂƐ ŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϰϵϱĨƵůůĐĂƉƚƵƌĞƚƌĂƐŚĂŶĚĚĞďƌŝƐĚĞǀŝĐĞƐƚŽĚĂƚĞǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘ KǀĞƌƚŚĞLJĞĂƌƐ͕'ϮŚĂƐĨĂƌĞdžĐĞĞĚĞĚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĞdžƉĞĐƚĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƉƌŽǀĞŶƚŽďĞƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůĂŶĚŵĂƐƚĞƌƐŽĨ ƚŚĞŝƌĐƌĂĨƚ͘tŝƚŚĞĂĐŚƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͕'ϮĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŐƌĞĂƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚĨŝĞůĚƌĞǀŝĞǁƐ͕ ƉŚŽƚŽƐĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŝŶŐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŽƵƐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ ĂĐŚƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚŽŶ
ƚŝŵĞĂŶĚǁŝƚŚŝŶďƵĚŐĞƚ͘
&ƵƌƚŚĞƌŵŽƌĞ͕/ĂŵŝŵƉƌĞƐƐĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ'ϮƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂŶĚ/ĂŵƉůĞĂƐĞĚƚŽƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚ'Ϯ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕/ŶĐ͘dŚĞŝƚLJŝƐůŽŽŬŝŶŐĨŽƌǁĂƌĚƚŽǁŽƌŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚ'ϮŽŶŶĞdžƚLJĞĂƌ͛ƐĂƚĐŚĂƐŝŶŽŶŶĞĐƚŽƌ WŝƉĞ^ĐƌĞĞŶWƌŽũĞĐƚ͘
&ĞĞůĨƌĞĞƌĞĂĐŚŽƵƚƚŽŵĞĨŽƌĂŶLJƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐďLJƉŚŽŶĞϳϭϰͲϳϯϴͲϲϴϴϲŽƌďLJĞŵĂŝů DĞůŝƐƐĂ͘ZĞŶĚŽŶΛĐŝƚLJŽĨĨƵůůĞƌƚŽŶ͘ĐŽŵ͘
^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕
DĞůŝƐƐĂZĞŶĚŽŶ͕W͘
͘
ŝǀŝů
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ
ŝƚLJŽĨ&ƵůůĞƌƚŽŶ
WƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
115
727
116
728
)%H
'%$H
(*"
)H
",;B,?FH
H
H
%?,;20H<B;AFH&B-94.H+<?8@H
#<0H B;AH(0;4<?H$,;,20:0;AH;,9F@AH
'010?0;.0H1<?H
H<;@A?B.A4<;H
)30H4AFH<1H B0;,H&,?8H3,@HD<?80/HD4A3H
H<;@A?B.A4<;H@4;.0H
HA<H4;@A,99H&(H'(H ,;/H
)(H/0C4.0@H<;H@A<?:H/?,4;@HA3?<B23<BAHA30H4AF@H=B-94.H?423A<1D,F H)30H4AFH3,@H:,4;A,4;0/H ,H 2<</HD<?84;2H ?09,A4<;@34=HD4A3H
H<;@A?B.A4<;H/B?4;2HA3,AHA4:0H ,;/H <B?H=?<50.A@H 3,C0H-00;H .<:=90A0/H <;H A4:0H ,;/H ,AH :,E4:B:H C,9B0H A<H A30H 4AF H !H .,;H ?0.<::0;/H
H <;@A?B.A4<;H 1<?H
1BAB?0H=?<50.A@HD4A3HF<B?H<?H<A30?H<?2,;4G,A4<;@H-,@0/H<;H<B?H0E=0?40;.0@ H+0H3,C0H.<:=90A0/HH
=?<60.A@HD4A3H
H<;@A?B.A4<;H?0@B9A4;2H4;H<C0?H
H@.?00;@H4;@A,990/
H
B;AH(0;4<?H$,;,20:0;AH;,9F@AH
73B;A-B0;,>,?8
.<:H
H0,.3H9C/H
B0;,H&,?8HH
H
HH
117
729
zero waste • zero wasted water
%2$5'2)38%/,&:25.6
0(0%(56
9$+,'.+256$1'
35(6,'(17
-(11<&+$9(=
9,&(35(6,'(17
-2+1*5$17
35(6,'(173527(0325(
67(9(6.$1*
&200,66,21(5
)$,7+,0,7&+(//
&200,66,21(5
(/<6(0$7621
(;(&87,9(2)),&(5
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
CALIFORNIA
.$5(1%$66
0$<25
%85($82)6$1,7$7,21
%$5%$5$520(52
',5(&725$1'*(1(5$/0$1$*(5
9$&$17
&+,()23(5$7,1*2)),&(5
6$5$,%+$*$
&+,()),1$1&,$/2)),&(5
-8/,($//(1
1,&2/(%(51621
0$6'2-,5,
$/(;$1'(5(+(/28
52%(573277(5
$66,67$17',5(&7256
+,6$1*.,0
$&7,1*+<3(5,21(;(&87,9(3/$170$1$*(5
±±
6287+%52$':$<
7+)/225
/26$1*(/(6&$
7(/
:::/$&,7<6$125*
$1(48$/(03/2<0(1723325781,7<(03/2<(5
Recyclable and made from recycled waste
)HEUXDU\
(/(&7521,&0$,/
7R:KRP,W0D\&RQFHUQ
/(77(52)5(&200(1'$7,21)25*&216758&7,21,1&
* &RQVWUXFWLRQ
*
KDV GHVLJQHG IDEULFDWHG DQG LQVWDOOHG WKRXVDQGV RI WKHLU WUDVK FDSWXUH GHYLFHVLQWKH&LW\ RI/RV$QJHOHV VLQFHWKH EXUHDX RI 6DQLWDWLRQ DQG(QYLURQPHQW /$6$1
DSSURYHG WKHLU &36 LQVHUWV DQG $56 FXUE RSHQLQJ VFUHHQV LQ *¶V GHYLFHV DUH YHU\ HIIHFWLYH DW FDSWXULQJ WUDVK WKHLU LQVWDOODWLRQV DUH RI KLJK TXDOLW\ DQG WKH FRPSDQ\ LV SURIHVVLRQDODQGUHOLDEOH
,Q/$6$1DZDUGHG*&RQVWUXFWLRQD\HDUFRQWUDFWWRIDEULFDWHDQGLQVWDOO )XOO&DSWXUH&DWFK%DVLQ ,QVHUWVDQG&XUE2SHQLQJ6FUHHQ&RYHUV *¶V&360RGDQG$56
&/ GHYLFHV
* LV RQH RI RQO\ WZR DSSURYHG YHQGRUV WKDW /$6$1 KDV IRXQG DFFHSWDEOH WR SURYLGH ERWK WKH FDWFK EDVLQ FRQQHFWRU SLSH VFUHHQV &36
DQG DXWRPDWLF UHWUDFWDEOH VFUHHQV
$56
LQ&LW\RI/RV$QJHOHVSXEOLFULJKWRIZD\FDWFKEDVLQV *¶VLQVWDOODWLRQFUHZVDUH KLJKO\ VNLOOHGDQGFRPPXQLFDWHZHOOZLWKLQVSHFWRUVWKHLUZRUNLV SHUIRUPHG RQWLPHDQGZLWKLQ EXGJHWDQGWKHLU SURMHFWPDQDJHPHQW KDV EHHQHIILFLHQW7KHLU SHUVRQQHODUHYHU\JRRGDWSURYLGLQJDOOUHTXLUHGGRFXPHQWDWLRQDQGPDNLQJWKHSURFHVVHDV\ 7KHDSSURYDORI*GHYLFHVE\/$6$1OHDGWRWKHLQVWDOODWLRQRIWKHLU&360RGDQG$56&/ GHYLFHVRQLPSRUWDQW&LW\SURMHFWVVXFKDV
LA World Airports Roadways (LAWA RUE). 2024
LA Metro Westside Purple Line. 2024
LA Metro Regional Connector Corridor. 2023
LA Metro LAX Corridor Project. 2021
Port of Los Angeles. 2020
Hyperion Treatment Plant Screens. 2016
Branford Dry Well project. 2016
City of LA TMDLS – Machado Lake. 2015-16
LA Metro Exposition Rail Line. 2015
I-405 Widening Project. 2014
118
730
/HWWHURI5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ±*&RQVWUXFWLRQ
3DJH1R
, DP SOHDVHG WR RIIHU WKLV OHWWHU RI UHFRPPHQGDWLRQ IRU * &RQVWUXFWLRQ %DVHG RQ RXU H[SHULHQFHZLWK*&RQVWUXFWLRQ,FDQUHFRPPHQGWKHLUSURGXFWVDQGVHUYLFHV 6LQFHUHO\
-21$7+$1%$//
$VVLVWDQW'LYLVLRQ0DQDJHU
:DWHUVKHG3URWHFWLRQ'LYLVLRQ
/$6DQLWDWLRQDQG(QYLURQPHQW
--%ME
F
0DUVD&KDQ/$6$1
119
731
120
732
121
733
February 14, 2025
Re: Letter of Recommendation for G2 Construction, Inc.
To Whom It May Concern,
G2 Construction has been awarded 6 contracts by the City of San Marino to install their ARSCL and CPS-Mod Full Capture System devices between 2020 and December 2024. Their projects were all successfully completed on time and within budget. G2’s work has been performed professionally, quickly, and with effective communication of their schedule, project status, and solutions to issues.
The City has been pleased with the quality of their installed devices, and G2’s CPS-Mod connector pipe screen is certified as a trash Full Capture System by the State Water Resources Control Board. Both their CPS and ARS devices are approved by LACDPW and will likely be installed in San Marino’s County-owned catch basins in the future.
G2 Construction’s personnel are easy to work with, and very responsive to the City’s requests.
My experience has been very positive, and the company has delivered on their promises to the City.
Based on our experience with G2 Construction, I can recommend their products and services.
Sincerely,
Amber Shah, P.E.
Parks & Public Works Director/City Engineer
2200 Huntington Drive
San Marino, CA 91108
[email protected]
P: (626) 300-0787
122
734
5050 N. Clark Avenue x Lakewood, California 90712 x (562) 866-9771 February 6, 2025
Orange County Public Works
Procurement Services
601 North Ross Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
SUBJECT: G2 Construction, Inc. – Letter of Recommendation To Whom It May Concern:
The City of Lakewood contracted with G2 Construction on three (3) projects to install State Water Board certified CPS-Mod connector pipe screens and GITS grated inlet trash screens.
G2 successfully installed their products in 2016, 2018, and 2023 as part of the City’s FullCapture Catch Basin Insert Program to the satisfaction of the City. G2’s personnel have been very capable, and both projects installed as scheduled.
Our experience with G2 has been very positive, and I can recommend their products and services. Their team has been very professional and responsive to our needs, and they were quick to provide field evaluations of our catch basins and recommendations for our project.
Some of the City’s catch basins were unique and G2 was able to manufacture customized CPSMod devices that allowed us to meet regulations and the City’s water quality objectives.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Ms. Konya Vivanti
Environmental Programs Manager
City of Lakewood
5050 Clark Avenue
Lakewood CA, 90712
(562) 866-9771 ext. 2507
[email protected]
123
735
OCLSB CERTIFICATE EXPIRATION DATE: 10/31/2026
CERTIFICATE ID: 2017839
LEGAL COMPANY NAME: G2 Construction Inc
DOING BUSINESS AS (DBA) NAME 1:
DOING BUSINESS AS (DBA) NAME 2: G2 CONSTRUCTION INC
COMPANY HEADQUARTERS ADDRESS: 1352 East Borchard Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
COMPANY PHONE NUMBER: 714/748-4242
COMPANY EMAIL: [email protected]
COMPANY FAX NUMBER:
COMPANY WEB ADDRESS www.g2construction.com
SERVICE AREA Orange
CONGRATULATIONS – Print and Save your OCLSB Certificate! Your business is now certified and ready to compete in a County competitive solicitation process as an Orange County Local Small Business.
THE COMPANY LISTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE MEETS THE
COUNTY OF ORANGE CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS AN
OCLSB
Click here to get help
*&RQVWUXFWLRQ,QF
124
736
March 28, 2024 CUCP# 41740
Metro File #6371
MR. JOHN ALVARADO
G2 Construction, Inc.
1352 East Borchard Ave
Santa Ana, CA 92705-4413
Subject: Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Certification Dear MR. JOHN ALVARADO:
We are pleased to advise you that after careful review of your application and supporting documentation, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) has determined that your firm meets the eligibility standards to be certified as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) as required under the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Regulation 49 CFR Part 26, as amended. This certification will be recognized by all of the U.S. DOT recipients in California. Your firm will be listed in the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP) database of certified DBEs under the following specific area(s) of expertise that you have identified on the NAICS codes form of the application package:
NAICS 331491: NONFERROUS METAL (EXCEPT COPPER AND ALUMINUM) ROLLING, DRAWING, AND EXTRUDING NAICS 237310: HIGHWAY, STREET, AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
NAICS 332313: PLATE WORK MANUFACTURING
Your DBE certification applies only for the above code(s). You may review your firms information in the CUCP DBE database which can be accessed at the CUCP website at https://californiaucp.dbesystem.com. Any additions and revisions must be submitted to Metro for review and approval.
In order to ensure your continuing DBE status, you are required to submit an annual update along with supporting documentation. If no changes are noted, then your DBE status remains current. If there are changes, Metro will review to determine continued DBE eligibility. Please note, your DBE status remains in effect unless Metro notifies you otherwise.
Also, should any changes occur that could affect your certification status prior to receipt of the annual update, such as changes in your firm's name, business/mailing address, ownership, management or control, or failure to meet the applicable business size standards or personal net worth standard, please notify Metro immediately. Failure to submit forms and/or change of information will be deemed a failure to cooperate under Section 26.109 of the Regulations.
Metro reserves the right to withdraw this certification if at any time it is determined that it was knowingly obtained by false, misleading, or incorrect information. Your DBE certification is subject to review at any time. The firm thereby consents to the examination of its books, records and documents by Metro.
Congratulations, and thank you for your interest in the DBE program. Should you have any questions, please contact us at (213) 922-2600. For information on Metro contracting opportunities, please visit our website at www.metro.net/connect.
Sincerely,
125
737
Ramon Ortiz
Director, Certification & Economic Development
126
738
March 28, 2024 Metro File #6371
MR. JOHN ALVARADO
G2 Construction, Inc.
1352 East Borchard Ave
Santa Ana, CA 92705-4413
Subject: Small Business Enterprise Certification
Dear MR. JOHN ALVARADO:
We are pleased to advise you that after careful review of your application and supporting documentation, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) has determined that your firm meets the eligibility standards to be certified as a Small Business Enterprise (SBE) as required under Metro's SBE Program. Your firm will be listed in Metro's SBE database of certified SBEs under the following specific areas of expertise:
NAICS 331491: NONFERROUS METAL (EXCEPT COPPER AND ALUMINUM) ROLLING, DRAWING, AND EXTRUDING NAICS 237310: HIGHWAY, STREET, AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
NAICS 332313: PLATE WORK MANUFACTURING
Your SBE certification is valid for five years from the date of this letter and applies only for the above NAICS code(s). Any additions and revisions must be submitted to Metro for review and approval.
In order to ensure your continuing SBE status, you are required to submit an annual update along with supporting documentation. If no changes are noted, then your SBE status remains current. If there are changes, Metro will review to determine continued SBE eligibility. Please note, your SBE status remains in effect unless Metro notifies you otherwise.
After the five-year certification period, your entire file will be reviewed in order to ascertain continued SBE certification status. You will be notified of the pending SBE status review and any documentation updates necessary prior to the expiration date.
Also, should any changes occur that could affect your certification status prior to receipt of the annual update application, such as changes in your firm's name, business/mailing address, ownership, management or control, or failure to meet the applicable business size standards or personal net worth standard, please notify Metro immediately.
Metro reserves the right to withdraw this certification if at any time it is determined that it was knowingly obtained by false, misleading, or incorrect information. Your SBE certification is subject to review at any time. The firm thereby consents to the examination of its books, records, and documents by Metro.
Congratulations, and thank you for your interest in Metro's SBE Program. Should you have any questions, please contact us at (213) 922-2600. For information on Metro contracting opportunities, please visit our website at www.metro.net/connect.
Sincerely,
Ramon Ortiz
Director, Certification & Economic Development
127
739
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11J.
Submitted By: Beaches, Parks and Recreation
Prepared By: Samantha Wylie, Beaches, Parks & Recreation Director Subject:
..titl e
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF 2025 DONATION FROM FRIENDS OF SAN CLEMENTE BEACHES, PARKS & RECREATION ..body FOUNDATION Fiscal Impact:
This donation of $56,595 will supplement the City’s Beaches, Parks & Recreation Department budget, reducing the need for City-funded expenditures and expanding the reach of services provided to the community.
Summary:
Before the City Council is the formal acceptance of the 2025 annual donation from the Friends of San Clemente Beaches, Parks & Recreation Foundation in the amount of $56,595. The donation will support various recreation events, programs, and youth scholarships throughout the year, as detailed in Attachment 2.
Background:
The Friends of San Clemente Beaches, Parks & Recreation Foundation (“Friends”) has been an integral nonprofit partner to the Beaches, Parks & Recreation Department since its inception.
Alongside their commitment to park project development support, each year, the Friends Foundation provides financial support that directly enhances the City's ability to deliver highquality, inclusive recreation programming and community events.
The 2025 donation request was submitted by City staff and approved by the Friends Foundation Board. The Foundation’s support remains critical in enabling access to recreational opportunities for residents of all ages, particularly through youth scholarships and camper-ships.
For the 2025 calendar year, the Friends Foundation has generously pledged a total of $56,595, allocated as follows:
Events – $23,450
(Including Santa’s Village Snow Hill, SC Open Skate Contest, Sunsets with Santa, Springtacular Egg Hunt, Summer Concert & Movie Series, Monster Dash, and Island Nights)
Scholarships – $18,000
(Citywide program scholarships for San Clemente residents of all ages and camper-ships for San Clemente youth spring and summer camps)
740
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11J.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2
Recreation Programs – $15,145
(Including Fun on the Run Mobile Recreation, SC Social Middle School Program, and general program/event support)
This funding significantly offsets program costs, allowing the City to serve a broader demographic, offer affordable programming, and sustain beloved community traditions.
Council Options:
Adopt Resolution No. 25-69, which will accept a 2025 donation from the Friends of San Clemente Beaches, Parks and Recreation Foundation in the amount of $56,595. Amend and adopt the resolution.
Direct staff to provide additional information and return to the City Council. Take no action.
Environmental Review/Analysis:
Acceptance of this donation is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), as it involves the continuation of government funding mechanisms that do not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable physical change in the environment.
Recommended Actions:
Staff Recommendation ..recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 25-69 to accept a donation of $56,595 from the Friends of San Clemente Beaches, Parks & Recreation Foundation to support 2025 recreation programs, events, and scholarships, and to authorize the Beaches, Parks & Recreation Director to ensure the proper disbursements of funds associated with the donation. ..end
Attachment:
1. Resolution No. 25-69
2. 2025 Letter of Funding Request – Friends of San Clemente BPR Foundation Notification:
Friends of San Clemente Beaches, Parks & Recreation Foundation 741
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 25-69
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A DONATION
FROM THE FRIENDS OF SAN CLEMENTE BEACHES,
PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF
RECREATION EVENTS, PROGRAMS, AND
SCHOLARSHIPS FOR THE 2025 CALENDAR YEAR
WHEREAS, the Friends of San Clemente Beaches, Parks & Recreation Foundation ("Friends Foundation") is a recognized nonprofit organization and long-standing community partner committed to enhancing the quality of life in San Clemente through support of public recreation programs and services; and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2025, the City submitted its 2025 Request for Funding and Support (“Funding Request”) to the Friends Foundation; and WHEREAS, the Friends Foundation has generously pledged a donation in the amount of $56,595 to the City of San Clemente for the 2025 calendar year; and WHEREAS, this donation is intended to support community recreation events, youth and adult scholarships, and recreational programming offered by the City's Beaches, Parks & Recreation Department; and
WHEREAS, acceptance of this donation aligns with the City’s strategic goals of promoting community well-being, expanding access to recreation, and supporting youth development.
NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of San Clemente does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council formally accepts the donation of $56,595 from the Friends of San Clemente Beaches, Parks & Recreation Foundation. In doing so, the Council expresses its sincere gratitude to the Friends Foundation for its continued commitment to the San Clemente community and partnership with the City.
SECTION 2. The Beaches, Parks and Recreation Director is authorized and directed to disperse such donated funds in support of City recreation events, programs, and scholarships in 2025 in substantial accordance with the Funding Request presented to the City Council on May 6, 2025.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ____________________, _______. 742
Resolution No. 25-69 Page 2
ATTEST:
___________________________ __________________________
City Clerk of the City of Steve Knoblock, Mayor of the
San Clemente, California City of San Clemente, California
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) §
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, LAURA CAMPAGNOLO, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 25-69 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Clemente held on the _______ day of _______________________, _________, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this _____ day of _________________, ________. __________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
Approved as to form:
___________________________
Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
743
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 14, 2025
To: Rick Loeffler, President
From: Samantha Wylie, Beaches, Parks & Recreation Director; Julia Petit, Recreation Supervisor For: Board of Directors, Friends of San Clemente Beaches, Parks & Recreation Foundation Subject: 2025 Request for Funding and Support
Dear Friends of San Clemente Foundation Board Members,
On behalf of the City of San Clemente, thank you for the opportunity to submit an annual request for funding. The City is grateful for your support in helping to fund recreation programs, events, and scholarships that serve the community.
Events 2024 2025
SC Open Skate Contest – Judges $1,200 $1,200
Santa’s Village – Snow Hill $6,000 $6,000
Sunsets with Santa $750 $750
Summer Concerts & Movies Series $14,000 $9,000
Springtacular – Egg Hunt $3,500 $3,500
Monster Dash $2,500 $2,500
National Night Out $1,000 $0
Island Nights $500 $500
Subtotal $29,450 $23,450
Scholarships
City Programs (All Ages) $6,000 $6,000
Camper-ships
(Summer/Spring Camps only, youth) $12,000 $12,000
Subtotal $18,000 $18,000
Programs
Fun on the Run Mobile Recreation $8,000 $8,000
Misc. Program & Event Support $0 $5,145
SC Social (Middle School Programming) $2,000 $2,000
Subtotal $10,000 $15,145
GRAND TOTAL $57,450 $56,595
Attachment 2
744
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11K.
Submitted By: Beaches, Parks and Recreation
Prepared By: Samantha Wylie, Beaches, Parks & Recreation Director Subject:
..titl e
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION
FROM THE GOLF CAPITAL REPLACEMENT RESERVE FOR CLUBHOUSE HVAC
REPLACEMENTS AND PLUMBING MAINTENANCE AND FINDING THE PROJECT
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ..body
Fiscal Impact:
The cost of $43,517 for the proposed improvements will be funded from the Golf Capital Replacement Reserve, which has a current available balance of $251,317.
Summary:
Resolution 25-70 will authorize a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $43,517 from the Golf Capital Replacement Reserve to Account No. 056-666-45300-000-00000 for the installation of a new HVAC system in the clubhouse snack bar and plumbing maintenance related to drain lines servicing the clubhouse restrooms.
Background:
The existing HVAC system serving the Golf Course clubhouse snack bar has reached the end of its functional life and requires replacement to maintain health, safety, and comfort standards for staff and patrons. Additionally, routine inspections of the clubhouse restroom facilities identified necessary maintenance to the existing plumbing drain lines, which must be addressed to avoid potential service disruptions and costly emergency repairs. The repairs are the responsibility of Wedgewood.
The City maintains a Capital Replacement Reserve specific to golf course facilities, which is designated for capital projects and improvements. The fund is supported by annual contributions from the clubhouse tenant, Z Golf Food & Beverages (Wedgewood), and is matched by an annual contribution from the Golf Operating Fund. The Golf Capital Replacement Reserve serves to support long-term capital investment in infrastructure that benefits both golf course operations and clubhouse facilities. At the time of this report, the available fund balance to fund this expenditure is $251,317.
Funding this work through the Golf Capital Replacement Reserve aligns with the fund’s intended purpose of supporting capital improvement projects that enhance the functionality and serviceability of the golf course and clubhouse facilities. 745
Meeting Date: May 20, 2025 Agenda Item: 11K.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2
Council Options:
Adopt Resolution No. 25-70, which will approve a supplemental appropriation from the Golf Capital Replacement Reserve to the Golf Depreciation Reserve Account No. 056-666-45300- 000-00000 for the replacement of the HVAC system and plumbing lines. Amend and adopt the Resolution.
Provide alternate direction to staff.
Take no action.
Environmental Review/Analysis:
The replacement of the HVAC system and repairs to the plumbing/drain lines are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 (Class 2, 14 CCR §15302) because they consist of replacing existing facilities located on the same sight and they will have the same purpose and capacity as the existing facilities with no expansion of use.
Recommended Actions:
Staff Recommendation ..recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 25-70, which will authorize a supplemental appropriation of $43,517 from the Golf Capital Replacement Reserve to the Golf Depreciation Reserve Account No. 056-666-45300-000-00000 for work related to improvements at the golf clubhouse, including the HVAC system and plumbing lines, and find the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 (Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction, 14 CCR §15302). ..end
Attachment:
1. Resolution No. 25-70
Notification:
None
746
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 25-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A
SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FROM THE GOLF
CAPITAL REPLACEMENT RESERVE FOR HVAC
REPLACEMENT AND PLUMBING MAINTENANCE AT THE
GOLF CLUBHOUSE AND FINDING THE PROJECT
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) UNDER CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15302 (CLASS 2, REPLACEMENT
OR RECONSTRUCTION, 14 CCR §15302)
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente maintains a Golf Capital Replacement Reserve, funded by annual contributions from the clubhouse tenant, Z Golf Food & Beverages (Wedgewood), and matching contributions from the Golf Operating Fund, for the purpose of funding capital improvements and projects at the municipal golf course; and WHEREAS, the existing HVAC system serving the clubhouse snack bar has reached the end of its useful life and requires replacement, and plumbing maintenance is required for the drain lines servicing the clubhouse restrooms to ensure continued safe and effective operations; and
WHEREAS, the current balance of the Golf Capital Replacement Reserve is $251,317 and funds are available to support the proposed improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Clemente does hereby find determine and resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and fully incorporated herein as findings.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes and approves a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $43,517 from the Golf Capital Replacement Reserve to Account #056-666-45300-000-0000 – Golf Depreciation Reserve Improvements Other Than Buildings, to fund the HVAC system replacement and plumbing maintenance work at the golf course clubhouse.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 (Class 2, 14 CCR §15302) because it consists of replacing existing facilities located on the same sight that will have the same purpose and capacity as the existing facilities with no expansion of use.
SECTION 4. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs staff to take such other and further actions as may be necessary and proper to accomplish the purposes of this resolution.
747
Resolution No. 25-70 Page 2
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ____________________, _______.
ATTEST:
___________________________ __________________________
City Clerk of the City of Steve Knoblock, Mayor of the
San Clemente, California City of San Clemente, California 748
Resolution No. 25-70 Page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) §
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, LAURA CAMPAGNOLO, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 25-70 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Clemente held on the _______ day of _______________________, _________, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this _____ day of _________________, ________.
__________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
Approved as to form:
___________________________
Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
749