Agenda packet, regular meeting — San Clemente City Council, May 19, 2026 (part 4 of 6)

Data Collection
Fehr & Peers collected the following traffic data in support of the assessment.

Traffic Counts
Peak hour vehicle turning movement counts were collected on a day with fair weather while school was in session. Peak hour traffic counts are presented on Figure 2 in Appendix B. Traffic counts were collected at the following City intersections:
o Avenida Pico & El Camino Real (Signalized)
o Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real (Signalized)
o Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha (Two-Way Stop Control)
o Avenida Pico & Avenida Vista Hermosa (Signalized)
Cumulative Development Projects
Fehr & Peers requested Pending and approved development project information (within two miles of the Project) from the City of San Clemente. Projects were included in the future forecasting if they were expected to be completed and in operation by the Project’s opening year (2026).

The “Miramar Events Center” (Miramar) project that is under construction directly Southeast of the Hansen Hotel and has the greatest effect on traffic forecasting. An OC Register article1 identified the last readily available description of the Miramar’s parking situation utilized in project trip routing. As the Miramar may use existing parking southwest of Avenida Pico and Calle Deshecha, parking access is assumed to be at the northern driveway of the parking lot along Calle Deshecha and at the eastern driveway along Avenida Pico. A local news outlet2 identifies the most readily available square footage estimates utilized to forecast vehicle trips which were incorporated into the Opening Year for analysis.

Trip Generation
Trip generation rates from Trip Generation, 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers [ITE], 2021) for Hotel (ITE Code 310), Fine Dining (ITE Code 931), and Café (Public Walk-Up) (ITE Code 936) were used to represent the Project. Trip generation rates are presented in Table 1 and used 1 https://web.archive.org/web/20240313041743/https://www.ocregister.com/2017/06/14/shuttered-for-25- years-san-clementes-historic-miramar-theater-moves-closer-to-new-life-as-events-center/ 2 https://web.archive.org/web/20240525141242/https://www.picketfencemedia.com/sanclementetimes/eyeon-sc/miramar-theater-soon-up-for-sale-again/article_df009b4e-0efa-11ef-9555-03cfde1c816a.html 958
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 3 of 8 ends

to estimate the daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trips associated with the Project in Table

2. Table 1: The Hansen Hotel Trip Generation Rates
Land Use ITE Land
Use Code Units Daily Rate
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate In Out Rate In Out
Hotel 310 Rooms 7.99 0.46 56% 44% 0.59 51% 49%
Fine Dining 931 KSF 83.84 0.73 - - 7.80 67% 33%
Café (Public Walk-Up) 936 KSF - 93.08 51% 49% 32.29 50% 50% Notes:

1.KSF = 1,000 square feet

2. Sources: Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021) Table 2: Project Trip Generation Estimates
Land Use ITE Land
Use Code Units Daily Trips
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Hotel 310 Rooms 487 16 12 28 18 18 36
Fine Dining 931 KSF 213 2 0 2 13 7 20
Café (Public Walk-Up) 936 KSF 931 14 13 27 5 4 9
Total Trip Generation 1,631 32 25 57 36 29 65
ITE’s Fine Dining (Land Use Code 931) does not provide an AM in and out distribution, so the trips generated for the AM peak are assumed as early morning preparation and management.

Additionally, ITE’s Coffee/Donut Shop without Drive-Through Window (Land Use Code 936) does not have a daily trip generation rate and was estimated by applying a 10% K-factor to the highest peak hour (AM) to estimate daily trips.

As presented in Table 2, the Project is expected to generate approximately 1,631 daily trips, including 57 trips (32 in/25 out) in the AM peak hour and 65 trips (36 in/29 out) in the PM peak hour.

This trip generation estimate is considered conservative as no trip internalization credits nor passby trip reductions have been applied to the trip generation, despite the project being within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) and proposing a San Clemente Trolley stop in front of the hotel. 959
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 4 of 8 ends

Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
Trip distribution for the project is shown on Figure 1 in Appendix B. Most trips (70%) are assumed to take Avenida Pico to the I-5 freeway for regionwide access to and from the Project. The remaining hotel guest trips are assumed to be to local destinations such as the local beaches, golf courses, restaurants and other businesses. Café and rooftop dining trips area also assumed to have a local draw along El Camino Real. Peak hour traffic forecasts are presented on Figure 2 in Appendix B.

Study Scenarios
Operations analysis was prepared for the following three scenarios:
x Existing (2024) Baseline Conditions – Consists of existing condition traffic turning movement counts collected at the study intersections based on vehicle, pedestrian and cyclist data collected on December 5th, 2024
x Opening Year (2026) Without Project Conditions – Traffic volumes were developed by applying an annual growth rate with the addition of traffic from nearby approved and pending development projects
x Opening Year (2026) With Project Conditions – Opening Year Without Project Conditions traffic volumes plus traffic generated by the proposed Project Signal Warrant Analysis
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Chapter 4C identifies nine signal warrants to guide the justification for a new traffic signal:
x Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume
x Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicle Volume
x Warrant 3: Peak Hour
x Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume
x Warrant 5: School Crossing
x Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
x Warrant 7: Crash Experience
x Warrant 8: Roadway Network
x Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
Many of these warrants are not applicable or data is not readily available. Additionally, eight- and four-hour vehicle volumes cannot be forecasted reliably. Fehr & Peers focused on Peak Hour signal warrant (Warrant 3) as traffic volumes can be forecasted using standard industry practices 960
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 5 of 8 ends

and it is typically the first volume-related warrant satisfied. Given the mixed-use and multimodal nature of the project vicinity, the Pedestrian Volume (Warrant 4) was also analyzed.

Per the CA MUTCD, the Peak Hour signal warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic conditions are such that, for a minimum of one hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) on an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street. The warrant reviews total stopped time delay experienced on the minor street approach, minor-street approach volumes, and total intersection volumes. The Pedestrian Volume Warrant determines whether a major street’s traffic impedes pedestrian crossings.

As shown in the worksheets in Appendix C, neither warrants were met under the Opening Year (2026) with Project Scenario. It should be noted that pedestrian traffic counts were collected in December, which may not be reflective of peak pedestrian traffic conditions. Traffic Signal Warrant 4 requires in excess of 200 pedestrians in the peak hour to satisfy the warrant, which may only occur during the busiest of summer beach activity, and would not satisfy the typical warrant which evaluates average activity.

While signal warrants were not met, operational analysis was performed on Avenida Pico and Calle Deshecha to understand how it would operate under Opening Year (2026) With Project Conditions.

Intersection Operations Analysis
Intersection operating conditions were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to evaluate LOS at signalized intersections and the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 7th Edition methodology to evaluate LOS at unsignalized intersections and turn pocket queueing capacity at signalized intersections.

ICU methodology is a standard evaluation approach and reports the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio at signalized intersections. The V/C ratio is determined by evaluating the critical movements for each intersection and comparing them to the critical movement capacity of the intersection.

The HCM 7th Edition methodology for signalized and unsignalized intersections estimates the average control delay for vehicles at the intersection. After V/C ratio and quantitative delay estimates are complete, each methodology assigns a qualitative letter grade to represent the operations of the intersection. These grades range from LOS A (minimal delay) to LOS F (excessive congestion). LOS E represents at-capacity operations. The LOS definitions are presented in Table

5. 961
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 6 of 8 ends

Table 5: LOS Definitions for Intersections
Level of
Service Description Volume-to-Capacity (V/C) Ratio
Unsignalized
Delay (Seconds)
A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length 0.000-0.600 < 10.0 B Operations with low delay occurring with good
progression and/or short cycle lengths 0.601-0.700 >10.0 to 15.0 C
Operations with average delays resulting from fair
progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear

0.701-0.800 >15.0 to 25.0
D
Operations with longer delays due to a combination of
unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable

0.801-0.900 >25.0 to 35.0
E
Operations with high delay values indicating poor
progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios.

Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences

0.901-1.000 >35.0 to 50.0
F
Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers
occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or
very long cycle lengths
Greater than 1.000 >50.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022).

Fehr & Peers used Vistro traffic operations analysis software to conduct ICU analysis and Synchro for HCM analysis. Table 6 presents Existing Conditions, Table 7 presents Opening Year No Project Conditions and Table 8 presents Opening Year Plus Project results. For the HCM analysis, “Right Turn On Red” volumes were not considered to provide a conservative delay estimate. Vistro and Synchro worksheets are provided in Appendix D.

Per City guidelines, LOS D is identified as the performance threshold for the Project. As shown in the Tables below, the study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably with and without the addition of Project traffic. Therefore, no infrastructure improvements are recommended with the Project.
962
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 7 of 8 ends

Table 6: Existing No Project (2024) LOS
Intersection Control
Type Period LOS Result V/C Ratio / Delay Results
1 Avenida Pico & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.42
PM A 0.39
2 Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.21
PM A 0.20
3 Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha TWSC AM B 11.6 s (EB)
PM B 10.5 s (EB)
4 Vista Hermosa & Avenida Pico Signal
AM A 0.33
PM A 0.32
Note: TWSC LOS Results are representative of intersection movement with the worst LOS/Delay.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.

Table 7: Opening Year (2026) No Project Intersection LOS Intersection Control
Type Period LOS Result V/C Ratio / Delay Results
1 Avenida Pico & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.44
PM A 0.44
2 Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.22
PM A 0.26
3 Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha TWSC AM B 13.3 s (EB)
PM B 11.6 s (EB)
4 Vista Hermosa & Avenida Pico Signal
AM A 0.34
PM A 0.45
Note: TWSC LOS Results are representative of intersection movement with the worst LOS/Delay.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.
963
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 8 of 8 ends

Table 8: Opening Year (2026) Plus Project Intersection LOS Intersection Control
Type Period LOS Result V/C Ratio / Delay Results
1 Avenida Pico & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.45
PM A 0.45
2 Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.23
PM A 0.27
3 Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha TWSC AM C 16.2 s (EB)
PM C 13.9 s (EB)
4 Vista Hermosa & Avenida Pico Signal
AM A 0.34
PM A 0.45
Note: TWSC LOS Results are representative of intersection movement with the worst LOS/Delay.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025
Queueing Analysis
As the Project is near the San Clemente Metrolink Station, the Station’s major access point of Avenida Estacion and El Camino Real required queueing analysis. Synchro can determine 50th and 95th percentile queue lengths to evaluate turn pocket performance. As shown in Table 9, the intersection’s Westbound Left movement is forecast to adequately serve 95th percentile queue demand across all scenarios.

Table 9: El Camino Real and Avenida Estacion Westbound Left Queue Estimates Intersection Scenario Time
Period
Turn Pocket
Length (ft)
50th Percentile
Queue Length (ft)
95th Percentile
Queue Length (ft)
2 Avenida Estacion &
El Camino Real
Existing
AM
175
2 26
PM 1 17
OYNP
AM 3 31
PM 2 26
OYPP
AM 11 51
PM 14 49
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.
964
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 9 of 8 ends

Conclusion
During Opening Year (2026) with Project conditions, all intersections performed at least at LOS C, which satisfies the city’s requirement of LOS D, and do not require additional infrastructure improvements. Forecasted Opening Year with Project volumes did not meet signal warrants for the TWSC intersection of Avenida Pico and Calle Deshecha and signalization of this intersection is not recommended. The existing westbound left turn pocket functions adequately under the forecast traffic demand and does not require extensions.

Appendices
A) Site Plan
B) Figures
C) Signal Warrant Worksheets
D) LOS and Queueing Worksheets
E) Existing Study Intersection Turning Movement Counts
F) Project Delivery Operations Memorandum
965

Appendix A: Site Plan
966
967
968
969
970
971
Appendix B: Figures
972
Figure
+DQVHQ+RWHO3HDN+RXU3URMHFW7ULS'LVWULEXWLRQ$VVLJQPHQW DQG([LVWLQJ7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQWV
3 (4)
17 (20)
5 (6)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0) 22 (25) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
6 (7)
0 (0)

1. Avenida Pico/El Camino Real
0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
3 (4)
4 (3)
22 (26)

2. Avenida Estacion/El Camino Real
0 (0)0 (0)
25 (30)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

3. Avenida Pico/Calle Deshecha
0 (0)
17 (20)0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
22 (25)

4. Vista Hermano/Avenida Pico
26 (29)
31 (36)
0 (0)

5. Project Driveway/El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Avenida Pico
El Camino Real
Avenida Estacion
Calle Deshecha
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
Vista Hermano
El Camino Real
Project Driveway
STOP
D
D
D
D
E
G
B
G
B
E
D
B
G
E
F
E
STOP
C
D
0 (0)
973
Figure
Traffic VolumesDQG/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQV
([LVWLQJ2<132<336FHQDULRV
62 (40)
183 (128)
16 (21)
152 (178)
210 (360)
17 (29) 170 (241) 98 (122)
232 (310)
178 (182)
209 (268)
28 (37)

1. Avenida Pico/El Camino Real
23 (20)29 (19)
350 (548)
19 (21)
420 (533)
21 (16)

2. Avenida Estacion/El Camino Real
11 (7)
170 (69)
38 (39)
0 (0)
11 (15)25 (48) 116 (139)
54 (82)
3 (9)
0 (0)

3. Avenida Pico/Calle Deshecha
224 (208)
289 (293)202 (296) 123 (175)
133 (284)
284 (397)

4. Vista Hermosa/Avenida Pico
379 (567)0 (0)
0 (0)
441 (549)

5. 3URMHFW'ULYHZD\/El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Avenida Pico
Calle Deshecha
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
Vista Hermosa
El Camino Real El Camino Real STOP STOP
STOP
AE
AACE
AACF
ACE
CE
G
ACC
B
E
D
AACC
AAF
CCF
CC
F
CE
61 (38)
168 (115)
8 (16)
145 (168)
208 (343)
14 (24) 167 (229) 76 (79)
231 (299)
177 (176)
207 (257)
16 (16)

1. Avenida Pico/El Camino Real
19 (17)22 (14)
346 (526)
16 (17)
413 (506)
16 (8)

2. Avenida Estacion/El Camino Real
10 (6)
169 (66)
16 (25)
0 (0)
9 (13)17 (33) 88 (86)
53 (79)
2 (8)
0 (0)

3. Avenida Pico/Calle Deshecha
223 (201)
267 (270)201 (286) 120 (160)
130 (266)
259 (341)

4. Vista Hermosa/Avenida Pico
El Camino Real
Avenida Pico
Calle Deshecha
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
Vista Hermosa
El Camino Real
STOP
STOP
AE
AACE
AACF
ACE
CE
G
ACC

B
E
D
AACC
AAF
CCF
65 (44)
200 (148)
21 (27)
152 (178)
210 (360)
17 (29) 192 (266) 98 (122)
232 (310)
178 (182)
215 (275)
28 (37)

1. Avenida Pico/El Camino Real
23 (20)29 (19)
350 (548)
22 (25)
424 (536)
43 (42)

2. Avenida Estacion/El Camino Real
11 (7)
170 (69)
63 (69)
0 (0)
11 (15)25 (48) 116 (139)
54 (82)
3 (9)
0 (0)

3. Avenida Pico/Calle Deshecha
224 (208)
306 (313)202 (296) 123 (175)
133 (284)
306 (422)

4. Vista Hermosa/Avenida Pico
379 (567)26 (29)
31 (36)
441 (549)
El Camino Real
Avenida Pico
Calle Deshecha
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
Vista Hermosa
El Camino Real El Camino Real STOP STOP
STOP
AE
AACE
AACF
ACE
CE
G
ACC

B
E
D
AACC
AAF
CCF
CC
F
CE
3URMHFW'ULYHZD\

5. 3URMHFW'ULYHZD\/El Camino Real 3URMHFW'ULYHZD\
([LVWLQJ
2SHQLQJ<HDU1R3URMHFW
2SHQLQJ<HDU3OXV3URMHFW

974
Appendix C: Signal Warrant
Worksheets
975
Project Hansen Hotel
Major Street Avenida Pico Scenario OYPP
Minor Street Calle Deshecha Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 10 0 63 0 x North/South
Through 170 116 0 3 East/West
Right 0 25 11 54
Total 180 141 74 57
Intersection Geometry
1 4

16.87 Approach with Worst Case Delay WB
57 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
OYPP
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.3 74 452
4 100 800
976
Project Hansen Hotel
Major Street Avenida Pico Scenario OYPP
Minor Street Calle Deshecha Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 10 0 63 0 x North/South
Through 170 116 0 3 East/West
Right 0 25 11 54
Total 180 141 74 57
11 NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 321 74
Major Street Minor Street Warrant Met Avenida Pico Calle Deshecha 0 100
200
300
400
500
600
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
100*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
977
Project Hansen Hotel
Major Street Avenida Pico Scenario OYPP
Minor Street Calle Deshecha Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 7 0 69 0 x North/South
Through 69 139 0 9 East/West
Right 0 48 15 82
Total 76 187 84 91
Intersection Geometry
1 4

13.87 Approach with Worst Case Delay WB
91 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
91 438
4 100 800
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
OYPP
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?

0.4 978
Project Hansen Hotel
Major Street Avenida Pico Scenario OYPP
Minor Street Calle Deshecha Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 7 0 69 0 x North/South
Through 69 139 0 9 East/West
Right 0 48 15 82
Total 76 187 84 91
Major Street Minor Street Warrant Met Avenida Pico Calle Deshecha 11 NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 263 91
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
100*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
979
2<33 AM & PM
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
250 350 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050 1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 1650 1750

TOTAL OF ALL

PEDESTRAINS

CROSSING

MAJOR STREET -

PEDESTRIANS

PER HOUR (PPH)

MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES -
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)…
*Note: 133 pph applies as the lower threshold volume.

Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour Existing
980
Appendix D: LOS and Queueing
Worksheets
981
,QWHUVHFWLRQ$QDO\VLV6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8H[J$0SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR([JB$0
9&'HOD\/26
)RUWZRZD\VWRSWKHVHYDOXHVDUHWDNHQIURPWKHPRYHPHQWZLWKWKHZRUVW

KLJKHVW
GHOD\YDOXH)RU
DOORWKHUFRQWUROW\SHVWKH\DUHWDNHQIRUWKHZKROHLQWHUVHFWLRQ 6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 6%5LJKW $ 9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD 3LFR
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 :%7KUX $ $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O &DPLQR5HDO
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 :%7KUX $ $YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR 5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH &RQWURO7\SH 0HWKRG :RUVW0YPW 9& 'HOD\ VYHK
/26
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
982
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

$QDO\VLV3HULRG
PLQXWHV
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG
,&8
&RQWURO7\SH
6LJQDOL]HG
,QWHUVHFWLRQ
$YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR5HDO
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/HYHO2I6HUYLFH5HSRUW
&URVVZDON <HV <HV <HV <HV
*UDGH>@
6SHHG>PSK@
([LW3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@ 1RRI/DQHVLQ([LW3RFNHW
(QWU\3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@ 1RRI/DQHVLQ(QWU\3RFNHW
/DQH:LGWK>IW@ 7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW /HIW 7KUX 5LJKW /HIW 7KUX 5LJKW /HIW 7KUX 5LJKW /HIW 7KUX 5LJKW /DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQ
$SSURDFK 1RUWKERXQG 6RXWKERXQG (DVWERXQG :HVWERXQG
1DPH $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO ,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWXS
%LF\FOH9ROXPH>ELF\FOHVK@
3HGHVWULDQ9ROXPH>SHGK@

7RWDO$QDO\VLV9ROXPH>YHKK@

7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@ 2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@ 2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@ 3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@ 1DPH $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO 9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
983
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR 0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 2YHUODS 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
984
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

$QDO\VLV3HULRG
PLQXWHV
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG
,&8
&RQWURO7\SH
6LJQDOL]HG
,QWHUVHFWLRQ
$YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O&DPLQR5HDO
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/HYHO2I6HUYLFH5HSRUW
&URVVZDON <HV 1R <HV
*UDGH>@
6SHHG>PSK@
([LW3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@
1RRI/DQHVLQ([LW3RFNHW
(QWU\3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@ 1RRI/DQHVLQ(QWU\3RFNHW
/DQH:LGWK>IW@
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW /HIW 5LJKW 7KUX 5LJKW /HIW 7KUX
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQ
$SSURDFK 1RUWKERXQG (DVWERXQG :HVWERXQG
1DPH $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQ (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWXS
%LF\FOH9ROXPH>ELF\FOHVK@
3HGHVWULDQ9ROXPH>SHGK@
7RWDO$QDO\VLV9ROXPH>YHKK@
7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@

2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@

2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@
3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@

1DPH $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQ (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO
9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
985
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR
0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
986
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

$QDO\VLV3HULRG
PLQXWHV
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG
,&8
&RQWURO7\SH
6LJQDOL]HG
,QWHUVHFWLRQ
9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD3LFR
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/HYHO2I6HUYLFH5HSRUW
&URVVZDON <HV <HV 1R
*UDGH>@
6SHHG>PSK@
([LW3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@
1RRI/DQHVLQ([LW3RFNHW
(QWU\3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@ 1RRI/DQHVLQ(QWU\3RFNHW
/DQH:LGWK>IW@
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW /HIW 5LJKW /HIW 7KUX 7KUX 5LJKW
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQ
$SSURDFK 6RXWKERXQG (DVWERXQG :HVWERXQG
1DPH 9LVWD+HUPRVD $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWXS
%LF\FOH9ROXPH>ELF\FOHVK@
3HGHVWULDQ9ROXPH>SHGK@
7RWDO$QDO\VLV9ROXPH>YHKK@

7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@
2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@

2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@
3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@

1DPH 9LVWD+HUPRVD $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR
9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
987
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR
0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
988
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8H[J$0SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR([JB$0

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX
:HVWERXQG

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG
9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD
3LFR
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
$YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O
&DPLQR5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
$YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
989
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
'HWDLO
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8H[J$0SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR([JB$0

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX
:HVWERXQG

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
9LVWD+HUPRVD
DQG$YHQLGD
3LFR

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'

7RWDO
9ROXPH

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
$YHQLGD
(VWDFLRQDQG(O
&DPLQR5HDO

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
$YHQLGD3LFR
DQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
990
6WXG\,QWHUVHFWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
991
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQDQG7UDIILF&RQWURO
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
992
7UDIILF9ROXPH%DVH9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
993
7UDIILF9ROXPH,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
994
7UDIILF9ROXPH1HW1HZ6LWH7ULSV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
995
7UDIILF9ROXPH2WKHU9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
996
7UDIILF9ROXPH)XWXUH7RWDO9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
997
7UDIILF&RQGLWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
998
,QWHUVHFWLRQ$QDO\VLV6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8H[J30SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR([JB30
9&'HOD\/26
)RUWZRZD\VWRSWKHVHYDOXHVDUHWDNHQIURPWKHPRYHPHQWZLWKWKHZRUVW

KLJKHVW
GHOD\YDOXH)RU
DOORWKHUFRQWUROW\SHVWKH\DUHWDNHQIRUWKHZKROHLQWHUVHFWLRQ 6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 6%5LJKW $ 9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD 3LFR
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 :%7KUX $ $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O &DPLQR5HDO
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 :%5LJKW
$ $YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH &RQWURO7\SH 0HWKRG :RUVW0YPW 9& 'HOD\ VYHK
/26
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
999
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

7RWDO$QDO\VLV9ROXPH>YHKK@
7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@ 2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@ 2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@ 3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@ 1DPH $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO 9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1000
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&

,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR 0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 2YHUODS 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1001
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@

2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@
3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@

1DPH $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQ (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO
9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1002
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR
0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1003
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1004
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR
0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1005
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8H[J30SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR([JB30

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX
:HVWERXQG

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG
9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD
3LFR
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1006
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
'HWDLO
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8H[J30SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR([JB30

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1007
6WXG\,QWHUVHFWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1008
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQDQG7UDIILF&RQWURO
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1009
7UDIILF9ROXPH%DVH9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1010
7UDIILF9ROXPH,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1011
7UDIILF9ROXPH1HW1HZ6LWH7ULSV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1012
7UDIILF9ROXPH2WKHU9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1013
7UDIILF9ROXPH)XWXUH7RWDO9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1014
7UDIILF&RQGLWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1015
,QWHUVHFWLRQ$QDO\VLV6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<13B$0SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<13B$0
9&'HOD\/26
)RUWZRZD\VWRSWKHVHYDOXHVDUHWDNHQIURPWKHPRYHPHQWZLWKWKHZRUVW

KLJKHVW
GHOD\YDOXH)RU
DOORWKHUFRQWUROW\SHVWKH\DUHWDNHQIRUWKHZKROHLQWHUVHFWLRQ 6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 6%5LJKW $ 9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD 3LFR
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 :%7KUX $ $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O &DPLQR5HDO
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 1%7KUX $ $YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR 5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH &RQWURO7\SH 0HWKRG :RUVW0YPW 9& 'HOD\ VYHK
/26
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1016
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@ 2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@

2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@ 3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@

1DPH $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO 9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1017
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR 0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 2YHUODS 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1018
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1019
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR
0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1020
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

$QDO\VLV3HULRG
PLQXWHV
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG
,&8
&RQWURO7\SH
6LJQDOL]HG
,QWHUVHFWLRQ
9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD3LFR
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/HYHO2I6HUYLFH5HSRUW
&URVVZDON <HV <HV 1R
*UDGH>@
6SHHG>PSK@
([LW3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@
1RRI/DQHVLQ([LW3RFNHW
(QWU\3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@ 1RRI/DQHVLQ(QWU\3RFNHW
/DQH:LGWK>IW@
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW /HIW 5LJKW /HIW 7KUX 7KUX 5LJKW
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQ
$SSURDFK 6RXWKERXQG (DVWERXQG :HVWERXQG
1DPH 9LVWD+HUPRVD $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWXS
%LF\FOH9ROXPH>ELF\FOHVK@
3HGHVWULDQ9ROXPH>SHGK@
7RWDO$QDO\VLV9ROXPH>YHKK@

7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@
2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@
2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@
3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@
1DPH 9LVWD+HUPRVD $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR
9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1021
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR

0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1022
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<13B$0SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<13B$0

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX
:HVWERXQG

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG
9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD
3LFR
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
$YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O
&DPLQR5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
$YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1023
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
'HWDLO
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<13B$0SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<13B$0

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX
:HVWERXQG

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
9LVWD+HUPRVD
DQG$YHQLGD
3LFR

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'

7RWDO
9ROXPH

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
$YHQLGD3LFR
DQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1024
6WXG\,QWHUVHFWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1025
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQDQG7UDIILF&RQWURO
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1026
7UDIILF9ROXPH%DVH9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1027
7UDIILF9ROXPH,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1028
7UDIILF9ROXPH1HW1HZ6LWH7ULSV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1029
7UDIILF9ROXPH2WKHU9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1030
7UDIILF9ROXPH)XWXUH7RWDO9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1031
7UDIILF&RQGLWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1032
,QWHUVHFWLRQ$QDO\VLV6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<13B30SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<13B30
9&'HOD\/26
)RUWZRZD\VWRSWKHVHYDOXHVDUHWDNHQIURPWKHPRYHPHQWZLWKWKHZRUVW

KLJKHVW
GHOD\YDOXH)RU
DOORWKHUFRQWUROW\SHVWKH\DUHWDNHQIRUWKHZKROHLQWHUVHFWLRQ 6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 6%5LJKW $ 9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD 3LFR
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 (%7KUX $ $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O &DPLQR5HDO
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 :%7KUX $ $YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR 5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH &RQWURO7\SH 0HWKRG :RUVW0YPW 9& 'HOD\ VYHK
/26
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1033
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

7RWDO$QDO\VLV9ROXPH>YHKK@ 7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@

2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@

2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@ 3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@

1DPH $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO 9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1034
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR

0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 2YHUODS 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1035
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@
3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@

1DPH $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQ (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO
9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1036
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR
0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1037
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@

2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@
3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@

1DPH 9LVWD+HUPRVD $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR
9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1038
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR

0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1039
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<13B30SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<13B30

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX
:HVWERXQG

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG
9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD
3LFR
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
$YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O
&DPLQR5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
$YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1040
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
'HWDLO
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<13B30SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<13B30

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
$YHQLGD
(VWDFLRQDQG(O
&DPLQR5HDO

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
$YHQLGD3LFR
DQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1041
6WXG\,QWHUVHFWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1042
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQDQG7UDIILF&RQWURO
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1043
7UDIILF9ROXPH%DVH9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1044
7UDIILF9ROXPH,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1045
7UDIILF9ROXPH1HW1HZ6LWH7ULSV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1046
7UDIILF9ROXPH2WKHU9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1047
7UDIILF9ROXPH)XWXUH7RWDO9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1048
7UDIILF&RQGLWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1049
,QWHUVHFWLRQ$QDO\VLV6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<33B$0SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<33B$0
9&'HOD\/26
)RUWZRZD\VWRSWKHVHYDOXHVDUHWDNHQIURPWKHPRYHPHQWZLWKWKHZRUVW

KLJKHVW
GHOD\YDOXH)RU
DOORWKHUFRQWUROW\SHVWKH\DUHWDNHQIRUWKHZKROHLQWHUVHFWLRQ 6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 6%5LJKW $ 9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD 3LFR
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 :%7KUX $ $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O &DPLQR5HDO
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 1%7KUX $ $YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR 5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH &RQWURO7\SH 0HWKRG :RUVW0YPW 9& 'HOD\ VYHK
/26
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1050
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@ 2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@

1DPH $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO 9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1051
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR 0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 2YHUODS 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1052
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

$QDO\VLV3HULRG
PLQXWHV
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG
,&8
&RQWURO7\SH
6LJQDOL]HG
,QWHUVHFWLRQ
$YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O&DPLQR5HDO
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/HYHO2I6HUYLFH5HSRUW
&URVVZDON <HV 1R <HV
*UDGH>@
6SHHG>PSK@
([LW3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@
1RRI/DQHVLQ([LW3RFNHW
(QWU\3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@ 1RRI/DQHVLQ(QWU\3RFNHW
/DQH:LGWK>IW@
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW /HIW 5LJKW 7KUX 5LJKW /HIW 7KUX
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQ
$SSURDFK 1RUWKERXQG (DVWERXQG :HVWERXQG
1DPH $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQ (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWXS
%LF\FOH9ROXPH>ELF\FOHVK@
3HGHVWULDQ9ROXPH>SHGK@
7RWDO$QDO\VLV9ROXPH>YHKK@
7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@

2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@
2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@
3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@
1DPH $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQ (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO
9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1053
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR
0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1054
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

$QDO\VLV3HULRG
PLQXWHV
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG
,&8
&RQWURO7\SH
6LJQDOL]HG
,QWHUVHFWLRQ
9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD3LFR
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/HYHO2I6HUYLFH5HSRUW
&URVVZDON <HV <HV 1R
*UDGH>@
6SHHG>PSK@
([LW3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@
1RRI/DQHVLQ([LW3RFNHW
(QWU\3RFNHW/HQJWK>IW@ 1RRI/DQHVLQ(QWU\3RFNHW
/DQH:LGWK>IW@
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW /HIW 5LJKW /HIW 7KUX 7KUX 5LJKW
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQ
$SSURDFK 6RXWKERXQG (DVWERXQG :HVWERXQG
1DPH 9LVWD+HUPRVD $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWXS
%LF\FOH9ROXPH>ELF\FOHVK@
3HGHVWULDQ9ROXPH>SHGK@
7RWDO$QDO\VLV9ROXPH>YHKK@

7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@
2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@
2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@
3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@
1DPH 9LVWD+HUPRVD $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR
9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1055
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR
0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1056
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<33B$0SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<33B$0

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX
:HVWERXQG

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG
9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD
3LFR
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
$YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O
&DPLQR5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
$YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1057
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
'HWDLO
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<33B$0SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<33B$0

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX
:HVWERXQG

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
9LVWD+HUPRVD
DQG$YHQLGD
3LFR

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'

7RWDO
9ROXPH

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
$YHQLGD
(VWDFLRQDQG(O
&DPLQR5HDO

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
$YHQLGD3LFR
DQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1058
6WXG\,QWHUVHFWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1059
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQDQG7UDIILF&RQWURO
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1060
7UDIILF9ROXPH%DVH9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1061
7UDIILF9ROXPH,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1062
7UDIILF9ROXPH1HW1HZ6LWH7ULSV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1063
7UDIILF9ROXPH2WKHU9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1064
7UDIILF9ROXPH)XWXUH7RWDO9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1065
7UDIILF&RQGLWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1066
,QWHUVHFWLRQ$QDO\VLV6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<33B30SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<33B30
9&'HOD\/26
)RUWZRZD\VWRSWKHVHYDOXHVDUHWDNHQIURPWKHPRYHPHQWZLWKWKHZRUVW

KLJKHVW
GHOD\YDOXH)RU
DOORWKHUFRQWUROW\SHVWKH\DUHWDNHQIRUWKHZKROHLQWHUVHFWLRQ 6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 6%5LJKW $ 9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD 3LFR
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 (%5LJKW $ $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O &DPLQR5HDO
6LJQDOL]HG ,&8 :%5LJKW $ $YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR 5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH &RQWURO7\SH 0HWKRG :RUVW0YPW 9& 'HOD\ VYHK
/26
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1067
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

7RWDO$QDO\VLV9ROXPH>YHKK@
7RWDO0LQXWH9ROXPH>YHKK@

2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@

1DPH $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO 9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1068
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR

0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 6SOLW 2YHUODS 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3URWHFWH 3HUPLVV 3HUPLVV 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1069
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@
3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@

1DPH $YHQLGD(VWDFLRQ (O&DPLQR5HDO (O&DPLQR5HDO
9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1070
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR
0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 6SOLW 6SOLW 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1071
9ROXPHWR&DSDFLW\
YF

/HYHO2I6HUYLFH
$
'HOD\
VHFYHK

2WKHU$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU 3HDN+RXU)DFWRU

7RWDO+RXUO\9ROXPH>YHKK@
2WKHU9ROXPH>YHKK@
([LVWLQJ6LWH$GMXVWPHQW9ROXPH>YHKK@
3DVVE\7ULSV>YHKK@
'LYHUWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
6LWH*HQHUDWHG7ULSV>YHKK@
,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH>YHKK@
*URZWK)DFWRU +HDY\9HKLFOHV3HUFHQWDJH>@ %DVH9ROXPH$GMXVWPHQW)DFWRU %DVH9ROXPH,QSXW>YHKK@
1DPH 9LVWD+HUPRVD $YHQLGD3LFR $YHQLGD3LFR
9ROXPHV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1072
,QWHUVHFWLRQ9&
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26 $
9&0RYHPHQW9&5DWLR

0RYHPHQW$SSURDFK ,QWHUVHFWLRQ5HVXOWV
/HDG/DJ /HDG /HDG
$X[LOLDU\6LJQDO*URXSV
6LJQDO*URXS
&RQWURO7\SH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3URWHFWHG 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3HUPLVVLYH 3KDVLQJ 7LPLQJ
/RVWWLPH>V@
&\FOH/HQJWK>V@
,QWHUVHFWLRQ6HWWLQJV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1073
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<33B30SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<33B30

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX
:HVWERXQG

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG
9LVWD+HUPRVDDQG$YHQLGD
3LFR
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
$YHQLGD(VWDFLRQDQG(O
&DPLQR5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
$YHQLGD3LFRDQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO
,' ,QWHUVHFWLRQ1DPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1074
7XUQLQJ0RYHPHQW9ROXPH
'HWDLO
5HSRUW)LOH
&
??,&8B2<33B30SGI
9LVWUR)LOH
&
??/266WXG\Y,&8YLVWUR 6FHQDULR2<33B30

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX
:HVWERXQG

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
9LVWD+HUPRVD
DQG$YHQLGD
3LFR

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'

7RWDO
9ROXPH

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
$YHQLGD
(VWDFLRQDQG(O
&DPLQR5HDO

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'

7RWDO
9ROXPH

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
:HVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
(DVWERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
6RXWKERXQG

5LJKW

7KUX

/HIW
1RUWKERXQG
)XWXUH7RWDO
2WKHU
1HW1HZ7ULSV
,Q3URFHVV
*URZWK)DFWRU
)LQDO%DVH
$YHQLGD3LFR
DQG(O&DPLQR
5HDO

9ROXPH7\SH ,QWHUVHFWLRQ
1DPH ,'
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1075
6WXG\,QWHUVHFWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1076
/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQDQG7UDIILF&RQWURO
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1077
7UDIILF9ROXPH%DVH9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1078
7UDIILF9ROXPH,Q3URFHVV9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1079
7UDIILF9ROXPH1HW1HZ6LWH7ULSV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1080
7UDIILF9ROXPH2WKHU9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1081
7UDIILF9ROXPH)XWXUH7RWDO9ROXPH
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1082
7UDIILF&RQGLWLRQV
9HUVLRQ
63

*HQHUDWHGZLWK
1083
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/14/2025
Exg_AM 3:30 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 0 9 0 2 53 10 169 0 0 88 17
Future Vol, veh/h 16 0 9 0 2 53 10 169 0 0 88 17
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 205205206206
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length ------------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 333333333333
Mvmt Flow 22 0 13 0 3 74 14 235 0 0 122 24
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 409 403 145 390 414 240 152 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 140 140 - 263 263 - ------
Stage 2 269 263 - 127 152 - ------
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227----- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 551 535 900 567 527 797 1423 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 861 779 - 740 689 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 735 689 - 874 770 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 487 526 890 551 518 793 1415 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 487 526 - 551 518 - ------
Stage 1 856 774 - 732 682 - ------
Stage 2 653 682 - 858 765 - ------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v11.58 10.13 0.42 0

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 101 - 581 778 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - 0.06 0.098 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 0 11.6 10.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS AABB - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 0.3 - -
1084
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/14/2025
Exg_PM 3:54 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 0 13 0 8 79 6 66 0 0 86 33
Future Vol, veh/h 25 0 13 0 8 79 6 66 0 0 86 33
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 104401200002
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length ------------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 333333333333
Mvmt Flow 31 0 16 0 10 98 7 81 0 0 106 41
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 231 225 133 206 245 82 149 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 129 129 - 96 96 - ------
Stage 2 102 96 - 110 149 - ------
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227----- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 722 672 914 749 655 974 1426 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 873 788 - 908 813 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 901 813 - 893 772 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 635 668 909 729 650 973 1424 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 635 668 - 729 650 - ------
Stage 1 871 786 - 903 809 - ------
Stage 2 796 809 - 873 771 - ------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v10.45 9.37 0.63 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 150 - 708 931 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - 0.066 0.115 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 0 10.4 9.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS AABA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 0.4 - -
1085
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/16/2025
OYNP_AM 4:14 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 0 11 0 3 54 11 170 0 0 116 25
Future Vol, veh/h 38 0 11 0 3 54 11 170 0 0 116 25
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 205205206206
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length ------------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 333333333333
Mvmt Flow 53 0 15 0 4 75 15 236 0 0 161 35
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 458 451 189 433 469 241 202 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 184 184 - 267 267 - ------
Stage 2 274 267 - 166 202 - ------
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227----- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 511 502 850 531 491 795 1364 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 815 745 - 737 686 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 730 686 - 834 732 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 448 493 841 513 482 792 1356 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 448 493 - 513 482 - ------
Stage 1 810 741 - 727 678 - ------
Stage 2 645 678 - 814 728 - ------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v13.32 10.24 0.47 0

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 109 - 501 766 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - 0.136 0.103 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 0 13.3 10.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS AABB - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.5 0.3 - -
1086
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/16/2025
OYNP_PM 4:15 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 39 0 15 0 9 82 7 69 0 0 139 48
Future Vol, veh/h 39 0 15 0 9 82 7 69 0 0 139 48
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 104401200002
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length ------------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 333333333333
Mvmt Flow 48 0 19 0 11 101 9 85 0 0 172 59
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 312 306 207 278 335 86 233 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 203 203 - 102 102 - ------
Stage 2 109 102 - 176 233 - ------
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227----- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 638 606 831 672 584 970 1329 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 796 731 - 901 808 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 894 808 - 824 710 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 555 601 826 650 578 969 1326 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 555 601 - 650 578 - ------
Stage 1 795 730 - 895 803 - ------
Stage 2 783 803 - 802 709 - ------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v11.61 9.52 0.71 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 166 - 611 908 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.109 0.124 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 0 11.6 9.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS AABA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.4 0.4 - -
1087
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/16/2025
OYPP_AM 4:16 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 63 0 11 0 3 54 11 170 0 0 116 25
Future Vol, veh/h 63 0 11 0 3 54 11 170 0 0 116 25
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length ------------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 333333333333
Mvmt Flow 88 0 15 0 4 75 15 236 0 0 161 35
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 507 475 238 458 493 266 226 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 208 208 - 267 267 - ------
Stage 2 299 267 - 191 226 - ------
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227----- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 474 487 798 512 476 770 1337 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 791 728 - 737 686 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 708 686 - 808 715 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 394 466 753 480 456 748 1299 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 394 466 - 480 456 - ------
Stage 1 769 707 - 727 677 - ------
Stage 2 607 677 - 769 695 - ------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v16.19 10.58 0.47 0

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 109 - 424 724 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - 0.243 0.109 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 0 16.2 10.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A C B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.9 0.4 - -
1088
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/16/2025
OYPP_PM 4:16 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 0 15 0 9 82 7 69 0 0 139 48
Future Vol, veh/h 69 0 15 0 9 82 7 69 0 0 139 48
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length ------------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 333333333333
Mvmt Flow 85 0 19 0 11 101 9 85 0 0 172 59
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 369 334 261 304 363 115 261 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 231 231 - 102 102 - ------
Stage 2 138 102 - 202 261 - ------
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227----- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 585 585 775 646 563 935 1298 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 769 711 - 901 808 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 863 808 - 798 690 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 477 564 731 608 543 908 1261 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 477 564 - 608 543 - ------
Stage 1 747 691 - 895 803 - ------
Stage 2 729 803 - 756 671 - ------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v13.87 9.87 0.73 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 166 - 509 851 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.204 0.132 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 0 13.9 9.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS AABA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.8 0.5 - -
1089
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
Exg_AM 3:30 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 389 17 444 44
v/c Ratio 0.15 0.05 0.17 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 5.6 22.8 3.2 11.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 5.6 22.8 3.2 11.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0202
Queue Length 95th (ft) 91 26 70 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 3041 596 3136 1049
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.03 0.14 0.04
Intersection Summary
1090
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
Exg_PM 3:54 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 572 8 533 33
v/c Ratio 0.22 0.03 0.20 0.10
Control Delay (s/veh) 5.4 24.9 3.1 14.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 5.4 24.9 3.1 14.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0102
Queue Length 95th (ft) 134 17 83 28
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 3013 572 3136 1005
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.01 0.17 0.03
Intersection Summary
1091
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
OYNP_AM 4:14 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 396 23 452 56
v/c Ratio 0.16 0.07 0.17 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 5.8 22.2 3.3 11.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 5.8 22.2 3.3 11.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0303
Queue Length 95th (ft) 94 31 71 34
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 3041 593 3136 1044
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.04 0.14 0.05
Intersection Summary
1092
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
OYNP_PM 4:15 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 599 17 561 41
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.06 0.21 0.12
Control Delay (s/veh) 5.8 24.1 3.2 13.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 5.8 24.1 3.2 13.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0203
Queue Length 95th (ft) 145 26 89 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 3040 560 3136 981
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.03 0.18 0.04
Intersection Summary
1093
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
OYPP_AM 4:16 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 400 46 456 56
v/c Ratio 0.20 0.17 0.19 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 29.4 4.8 13.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 10.7 29.4 4.8 13.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 11 16 6
Queue Length 95th (ft) 99 51 71 35
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 2936 479 3136 815
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.10 0.15 0.07
Intersection Summary
1094
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
OYPP_PM 4:16 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 603 44 564 41
v/c Ratio 0.29 0.17 0.23 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 31.3 4.7 15.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 10.9 31.3 4.7 15.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 14 21 7
Queue Length 95th (ft) 154 49 89 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 2926 443 3136 760
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.10 0.18 0.05
Intersection Summary
1095
Appendix E: Existing Study
Intersection Turning Movement
Counts Appendix
1096
T112224
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5059
Thu, Dec 5, 24 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 1
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM Ÿ
PM N
MD Ż W E Ź

OTHER S
OTHER ź

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 110 2 1122012 0 0000
7:00 AM 14 30 1 22 12 19 20 27 0 5 24 19 193 0000 0
7:15 AM 8 30 2 31 15 17 20 26 5 2 33 20 209 0000 0
7:30 AM 3 29 0 56 21 32 30 47 2 2 35 36 293 0000 0
7:45 AM 22 57 0 76 32 39 31 70 6 4 40 38 415 0000 0
8:00 AM 23 41 3 45 11 22 37 37 2 2 49 62 334 0000 0
8:15 AM 5 41 1 61 17 54 38 38 3 3 71 46 378 0000 0
8:30 AM 11 29 4 49 16 52 39 63 3 7 47 31 351 0000 0
8:45 AM 14 28 3 53 15 34 54 58 4 1 41 26 331 0000 0
VOLUMES 100 285 14 393 139 269 269 366 25 26 340 278 2,504 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 25% 71% 4% 49% 17% 34% 41% 55% 4% 4% 53% 43% APP/DEPART 399 / 832 801 / 190 660 / 773 644 / 709 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 61 168 8 231 76 167 145 208 14 16 207 177 1,478 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 26% 71% 3% 49% 16% 35% 40% 57% 4% 4% 52% 44% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.750 0.806 0.857 0.833 0.890
APP/DEPART 237 / 490 474 / 106 367 / 447 400 / 435 0
4:00 PM 14 30 7 83 17 60 38 83 10 8 66 49 465 0000 0
4:15 PM 7 20 2 73 22 61 51 92 5 2 68 39 442 0000 0
4:30 PM 11 30 4 60 18 57 43 82 3 2 73 49 432 0000 0
4:45 PM 6 35 3 83 22 51 36 86 6 4 50 39 421 0000 0
5:00 PM 11 23 0 83 30 47 46 90 4 3 65 44 446 0000 0
5:15 PM 12 18 3 94 18 65 43 65 4 2 55 51 430 0000 0
5:30 PM 10 19 2 72 21 27 40 65 4 5 52 37 354 0000 0
5:45 PM 5 17 5 79 17 30 19 44 4 2 45 36 303 0000 0
VOLUMES 76 192 26 627 165 398 316 607 40 28 474 344 3,293 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 26% 65% 9% 53% 14% 33% 33% 63% 4% 3% 56% 41% APP/DEPART 294 / 852 1,190 / 233 963 / 1,260 846 / 948 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 38 115 16 299 79 229 168 343 24 16 257 176 1,760 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 22% 68% 9% 49% 13% 38% 31% 64% 4% 4% 57% 39% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.828 0.948 0.904 0.905 0.946
APP/DEPART 169 / 459 607 / 119 535 / 658 449 / 524 0
Avenida Pico

NORTH LEG
El Camino Real WEST LEG EAST LEG El Camino Real

SOUTH LEG
Avenida Pico

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 3 0 1 5 9 2004 6 1011 3
7:15 AM 2 2 3 2 9 1111 4 1121 5
7:30 AM 1 1 3 0 5 1120 4 0010 1
7:45 AM 1 2 0 2 5 0201 3 1001 2
8:00 AM 1 3 4 4 12 1104 6 0240 6
8:15 AM 1 4 5 4 14 1303 7 0151 7
8:30 AM 0 1 1 1 3 0111 3 0000 0
8:45 AM 0 2 2 0 4 0120 3 0100 1
TOTAL 9 15 19 18 61 6 10 6 14 36 3 5 13 4 25
BEGIN PEAK HR 2 7 1 9 19
4:00 PM 0 2 2 1 5 0000 0 0221 5
4:15 PM 2 3 4 1 10 1341 9 1000 1
4:30 PM 0 1 1 1 3 0111 3 0000 0
4:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0000 0 1000 1
5:00 PM 2 0 3 5 10 1021 4 1014 6
5:15 PM 0 4 3 2 9 0322 7 0110 2
5:30 PM 0 0 0 4 4 0002 2 0002 2
5:45 PM 0 1 2 1 4 0121 4 0000 0
TOTAL 5 11 15 15 46 2 8 11 8 29 3 3 4 7 17
1452 12

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
San Clemente
Avenida Pico
El Camino Real
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:00 PM

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real

AM PM AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:00 PM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER
7:45 AM
1097
1,991 667 304 1,020 TOTAL 1,684
1,190 398 165 627 PM 852
801 269 139 393 AM 832
644846
1,490
1,657
948709
278344622
340474814
TOTAL
PM
AM
262854
585316269
AMPM
TOTAL
973607366
654025
773
1,260 2,033
1,623
963660
190 AM 100 285 14 399
233 PM 76 192 26 294
423 TOTAL 176 477 40 693
1,081 396 155 530 TOTAL 949
607 229 79 299 PM 459
474 167 76 231 AM 490
400449849
959524435
177176353
207257464
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
161632
313168145
#N/A
AMPM
TOTAL
551343208
PM 4:00 PM
5:45 PM
382414
447658
1,105
902535367
106 AM 61 168 8 237
119 PM 38 115 16 169
225 Total 99 283 24 406
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Avenida Pico
El Camino Real
El Camino Real

ALL HOURS
San Clemente
SC5059
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
El Camino Real
El Camino Real

PEAK HOUR
1098
T112224
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5059
Thu, Dec 5, 24 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 2
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM Ÿ
PM N
MD Ż W E Ź

OTHER S
OTHER ź

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0X0 X XXX2012 X 0000
7:00 AM 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 46 5 5 52 0 113 0000 0
7:15 AM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 48 3 4 54 0 113 0000 0
7:30 AM 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 73 1 4 67 0 154 0000 0
7:45 AM 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 106 8 11 87 0 224 0000 0
8:00 AM 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 60 0 2 96 0 170 0000 0
8:15 AM 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 76 4 2 121 0 214 0000 0
8:30 AM 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 104 4 1 109 0 224 0000 0
8:45 AM 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 109 4 5 82 0 211 0000 0
VOLUMES 34 0 36 0 0 0 0 622 29 34 668 0 1,423 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 49% 0% 51% 0% 0% 0% 0% 96% 4% 5% 95% 0%
APP/DEPART 70 / 00 / 63 651 / 658 702 / 702 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 19 0 22 0 0 0 0 346 16 16 413 0 832 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 46% 0% 54% 0% 0% 0% 0% 96% 4% 4% 96% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.854 0.000 0.794 0.872 0.929
APP/DEPART 41 / 00 / 32 362 / 368 429 / 432 0
4:00 PM 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 138 6 1 134 0 287 0010 1
4:15 PM 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 131 3 3 132 0 281 0000 0
4:30 PM 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 130 4 3 138 0 281 0000 0
4:45 PM 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 127 4 1 102 0 239 0000 0
5:00 PM 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 134 2 1 114 0 264 0000 0
5:15 PM 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 108 2 5 128 0 252 0000 0
5:30 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 3 86 0 209 0000 0
5:45 PM 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 66 1 4 79 0 158 0000 0
VOLUMES 34 0 30 0 0 0 0 951 22 21 913 0 1,972 0 0 1 0 1 APPROACH % 53% 0% 47% 0% 0% 0% 0% 98% 2% 2% 98% 0%
APP/DEPART 64 / 00 / 43 974 / 981 934 / 948 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 17 0 14 0 0 0 0 526 17 8 506 0 1,089 0 0 1 0
APPROACH % 55% 0% 45% 0% 0% 0% 0% 97% 3% 2% 98% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.646 0.000 0.938 0.911 0.945
APP/DEPART 31 / 00 / 25 544 / 540 514 / 524 0
Avenida Estacion

NORTH LEG
El Camino Real WEST LEG EAST LEG El Camino Real

SOUTH LEG
Avenida Estacion

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0010 1 0100 1
7:15 AM 0 3 2 0 5 0210 3 0110 2
7:30 AM 0 7 3 0 10 0530 8 0200 2
7:45 AM 1 0 1 0 2 0000 0 1010 2
8:00 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0100 1 0300 3
8:15 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0100 1 0200 2
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0000 0
8:45 AM 0 0 3 0 3 0030 3 0000 0
TOTAL 1 18 10 0 29 0 9 8 0 17 1 9 2 0 12
BEGIN PEAK HR 0200 2
4:00 PM 0 3 3 0 6 0020 2 0310 4
4:15 PM 0 2 4 0 6 0130 4 0110 2
4:30 PM 1 0 7 0 8 0070 7 1000 1
4:45 PM 1 1 2 1 5 0020 2 1101 3
5:00 PM 1 0 2 0 3 0020 2 1000 1
5:15 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0200 2 0100 1
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0000 0
5:45 PM 1 2 1 1 5 0000 0 1211 5
TOTAL 4 11 19 2 36 0 3 16 0 19 4 8 3 2 17
0 1 14 0 15

AM PM AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:00 PM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER
7:45 AM
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:00 PM

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
Avenida Estacion Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
San Clemente
Avenida Estacion
El Camino Real
1099
0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0
0 000 PM 0
0 000 AM 0
702934
1,636
1,650
948702
000
668913
1,581
TOTAL
PM
AM
342155
000
AMPM
TOTAL
1,573
951622
512229
658981
1,639
1,625
974651
63 AM 34 0 36 70
43 PM 34 0 30 64
106 TOTAL 68 0 66 134
0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0
0 000 PM 0
0 000 AM 0
429514943
956524432
000
413506919
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
16 8
24 000
#N/A
AMPM
TOTAL
872526346
PM 4:00 PM
5:45 PM
331716
368540908
906544362
32 AM 19 0 22 41
25 PM 17 0 14 31
57 Total 36 0 36 72
Avenida Estacion
Avenida Estacion
Avenida Estacion
El Camino Real
El Camino Real

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Avenida Estacion
El Camino Real
El Camino Real

ALL HOURS
San Clemente
SC5059
1100
T112224
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5059
Thu, Dec 5, 24 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 3
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP E/W
NOTES: AM Ÿ
PM N
MD Ż W E Ź

OTHER S
OTHER ź

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 010 0 1001001 0 0000
7:00 AM 0 30 0 0 10 6 7 0 1 0 2 11 67 0000 0
7:15 AM 1 27 0 0 14 9 6 0 0 0 0 3 60 0100 1
7:30 AM 1 28 0 0 18 7 3 0 1 2 1 3 64 0000 0
7:45 AM 4 56 0 0 38 4 4 0 4 0 0 16 126 0000 0
8:00 AM 2 59 0 0 11 4 4 0 2 0 1 7 90 0000 0
8:15 AM 1 26 0 0 18 3 1 0 2 0 0 18 69 0100 1
8:30 AM 3 28 0 0 21 6 7 0 1 0 1 12 79 0000 0
8:45 AM 0 24 0 0 15 2 5 0 3 1 1 14 65 0100 1
VOLUMES 12 278 0 0 145 41 37 0 14 3 6 84 623 0 3 0 0 3
APPROACH % 4% 96% 0% 0% 77% 22% 73% 0% 27% 3% 6% 90%
APP/DEPART 290 / 402 189 / 162 51 / 0 93 / 59 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 10 169 0 0 88 17 16 0 9 0 2 53 365 0100
APPROACH % 6% 94% 0% 0% 83% 16% 64% 0% 36% 0% 4% 96%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.734 0.631 0.781 0.764 0.724
APP/DEPART 179 / 239 106 / 97 25 / 0 55 / 29 0
4:00 PM 3 18 0 0 18 17 12 0 5 0 3 21 97 0000 0
4:15 PM 1 7 0 0 21 8 5 0 3 0 0 18 63 0000 0
4:30 PM 1 25 0 0 19 4 3 0 3 0 3 17 75 0000 0
4:45 PM 1 16 0 0 28 4 5 0 2 0 2 23 81 0000 0
5:00 PM 3 10 0 0 30 7 6 0 3 0 1 19 79 0000 0
5:15 PM 0 9 0 0 23 1 8 0 2 0 1 16 60 0000 0
5:30 PM 1 10 0 0 26 3 3 0 1 0 0 18 62 0000 0
5:45 PM 1 6 0 0 18 5 6 0 4 0 1 16 57 0000 0
VOLUMES 11 101 0 0 183 49 48 0 23 0 11 148 574 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 10% 90% 0% 0% 79% 21% 68% 0% 32% 0% 7% 93%
APP/DEPART 112 / 297 232 / 206 71 / 0 159 / 71 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 6 66 0 0 86 33 25 0 13 0 8 79 316 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 8% 92% 0% 0% 72% 28% 66% 0% 34% 0% 9% 91%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.692 0.850 0.559 0.870 0.814
APP/DEPART 72 / 170 119 / 99 38 / 0 87 / 47 0
Avenida Pico

NORTH LEG
Calle Deshecha WEST LEG EAST LEG Calle Deshecha

SOUTH LEG
Avenida Pico

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0000 0 1000 1
7:15 AM 1 0 1 3 5 1002 3 0011 2
7:30 AM 0 1 2 0 3 0110 2 0010 1
7:45 AM 1 0 1 2 4 0001 1 1011 3
8:00 AM 5 4 4 2 15 3012 6 2430 9
8:15 AM 8 4 5 2 19 2202 6 6250 13
8:30 AM 3 0 2 1 6 0011 2 3010 4
8:45 AM 2 1 2 1 6 1120 4 1001 2
TOTAL 21 10 17 11 59 7 4 5 8 24 14 6 12 3 35
BEGIN PEAK HR 5 2 2 6 15
4:00 PM 0 1 1 1 3 0000 0 0111 3
4:15 PM 3 2 0 2 7 1202 5 2000 2
4:30 PM 2 0 0 0 2 0000 0 2000 2
4:45 PM 3 4 0 0 7 0200 2 3200 5
5:00 PM 3 0 0 0 3 2000 2 1000 1
5:15 PM 2 1 0 4 7 0102 3 2002 4
5:30 PM 3 0 0 0 3 0000 0 3000 3
5:45 PM 1 0 2 0 3 0020 2 1000 1
TOTAL 17 8 3 7 35 3 5 2 4 14 14 3 1 3 21
1402 7

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
San Clemente
Avenida Pico
Calle Deshecha
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:00 PM

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
Avenida Pico Avenida Pico Calle Deshecha Calle Deshecha

AM PM AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:00 PM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER
7:45 AM
1101
421 90 328 0 TOTAL 699
232 49 183 0 PM 297
189 41 145 0 AM 402
93 159252
130
7159
84 148232
6 1117
TOTAL
PM
AM
303
854837
AMPM
TOTAL
000
372314
000
122
7151
162 AM 12 278 0 290
206 PM 11 101 0 112
368 TOTAL 23 379 0 402
225 50 174 0 TOTAL 409
119 33 86 0 PM 170
106 17 88 0 AM 239
5587
142
764729
5379
132
28 10
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
000
412516
#N/A
AMPM
TOTAL
000
PM 4:00 PM
5:45 PM
2213
9 000
633825
97 AM 10 169 0 179
99 PM 6 66 0 72
196 Total 16 235 0 251
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Avenida Pico
Calle Deshecha
Calle Deshecha

ALL HOURS
San Clemente
SC5059
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
Calle Deshecha
Calle Deshecha

PEAK HOUR
1102
T112224
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5059
Thu, Dec 5, 24 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 4
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM Ÿ
PM N
MD Ż W E Ź

OTHER S
OTHER ź

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 1 2 2 2 1 0000
7:00 AM 0 0 0 15 0 25 21 46 0 0 27 15 149 0000 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 10 0 33 37 39 0 0 35 17 171 0000 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 22 0 57 54 37 0 0 59 18 247 0010 1
7:45 AM 0 0 0 25 0 80 66 56 0 0 61 26 314 0000 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 27 0 33 67 70 0 0 43 31 271 0010 1
8:15 AM 0 0 0 28 0 48 49 81 0 0 86 29 321 0030 3
8:30 AM 0 0 0 40 0 40 41 60 0 0 69 44 294 0020 2
8:45 AM 0 0 0 28 0 45 36 62 0 0 57 40 268 0000 0
VOLUMES 0 0 0 195 0 361 371 451 0 0 437 220 2,042 0 0 7 0 7 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 35% 0% 65% 45% 54% 0% 0% 67% 33%
APP/DEPART 0 / 591 556 / 0 829 / 646 657 / 805 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 0 120 0 201 223 267 0 0 259 130 1,206 0 0 6 0 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 37% 0% 63% 45% 54% 0% 0% 67% 33%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.764 0.899 0.846 0.931
APP/DEPART 0 / 353 321 / 0 496 / 387 389 / 466 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 46 0 74 47 65 0 0 72 62 366 0010 1
4:15 PM 0 0 0 45 0 58 50 68 0 0 101 69 391 0020 2
4:30 PM 0 0 0 44 0 45 62 69 0 0 86 70 376 0010 1
4:45 PM 0 0 0 27 0 87 46 71 0 0 74 58 363 0010 1
5:00 PM 0 0 0 41 0 77 52 64 0 0 80 72 386 0000 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 48 0 77 41 66 0 0 101 66 399 0000 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 27 0 62 46 60 0 0 56 48 299 0000 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 42 0 59 35 41 0 0 63 35 275 0000 0
VOLUMES 0 0 0 320 0 539 379 504 0 0 633 480 2,860 0 0 5 0 5 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 37% 0% 63% 43% 57% 0% 0% 57% 43%
APP/DEPART 0 / 859 859 / 0 888 / 824 1,113 / 1,177 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 0 160 0 286 201 270 0 0 341 266 1,526 0 0 2 0 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 36% 0% 64% 42% 57% 0% 0% 56% 44%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.892 0.896 0.909 0.956
APP/DEPART 0 / 467 446 / 0 473 / 430 607 / 629 0
Avenida Vista Hermosa

NORTH LEG
Avenida Pico WEST LEG EAST LEG Avenida Pico

SOUTH LEG
Avenida Vista Hermosa

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0000 0 0200 2
7:15 AM 2 1 0 1 4 0000 0 2101 4
7:30 AM 0 1 0 2 3 0000 0 0102 3
7:45 AM 1 1 0 1 3 0001 1 1100 2
8:00 AM 0 4 0 1 5 0001 1 0400 4
8:15 AM 0 6 1 0 7 0000 0 0610 7
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0000 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0001 1 0000 0
TOTAL 3 15 1 6 25 0 0 0 3 3 3 15 1 3 22
BEGIN PEAK HR 0002 2
4:00 PM 0 1 1 0 2 0000 0 0110 2
4:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0000 0 0100 1
4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0000 0 1000 1
4:45 PM 0 1 0 1 2 0000 0 0101 2
5:00 PM 1 1 1 0 3 1000 1 0110 2
5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0000 0 0001 1
5:30 PM 4 0 0 0 4 3000 3 1000 1
5:45 PM 2 0 0 1 3 1001 2 1000 1
TOTAL 8 4 2 3 17 5 0 0 1 6 3 4 2 2 11
1000 1

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
San Clemente
Avenida Vis a e osa
Avenida Pico
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:30 PM

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
Avenida Vista He mosa Avenida Vista He mosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico

AM PM AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:30 PM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER
7:45 AM
1103
1 415 900 0 515 TOTAL 1 450
859 539 0 320 PM 859
556 361 0 195 AM 591
657
1 113 1 770
1 982 1 177
805
220480700
437633
1 070
TOTAL
PM
AM
000
750379371
AMPM
TOTAL
955504451
000
646824
1 470
1 717
888829
0 AM 000 0
0 PM 000 0
0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0
767 487 0 280 TOTAL 820
446 286 0 160 PM 467
321 201 0 120 AM 353
389607996
1 095
629466
130266396
259341600
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
000
424201223
#N/A
AMPM
TOTAL
537270267
PM 4:30 PM
5:45 PM
000
387430817
969473496
0 AM 000 0
0 PM 000 0
0 Total 0 0 0 0
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Avenida ista He mosa
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico

ALL HOURS
San Clemente
SC5059
Avenida ista He mosa
Avenida ista He mosa
Avenida ista He mosa
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico

PEAK HOUR
1104
F: Project Delivery Operations
Memorandum
1105
ϯϮϰϬϮ ƌŽǁŶ sĂůůĞǇ WĂƌŬǁĂǇ ηϭϬϮ Ͳ ĂŶĂ WŽŝŶƚ Ͳ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ Ͳ ϵϮϲϮϵ - ƉŚ͘ ϵϰϵ͘ϯϯϴ͘ϮϲϬϯ - WĂŐĞ ϭ ŽĨ Ϯ
ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ŝĨŽƌŶŝĂŽĂƐƚĂů ŽĂƐƚĂů ŽĂƐƚĂů ŽĂƐƚĂůŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶWƌŽũĞĐƚ WƌŽũĞĐƚ WƌŽũĞĐƚZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ ZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ ZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ :ŽďEK͘ϮϬϮϯͲϬϮϬ
d
͗ :ĂŶƵĂƌǇϭϲ͕ϮϬϮϱ
ZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͗ ZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͗ ZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͗ ^WWϮϮ͘ϯϮϭ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϭ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϭ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϭ͕hWϮϮ͘ϯϮϮ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϮ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϮ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϮ͕,WϮϮ͘ϯϮϯ WEη Ϭϱϳ͘ϭϵϭ͘ϲϬ Ϭϱϳ͘ϭϵϭ͘ϲϬ Ϭϱϳ͘ϭϵϭ͘ϲϬ
EͲdƌĂĐƚηϭϰϰϴϲ

WƌŽũĞĐƚ WƌŽũĞĐƚ WƌŽũĞĐƚĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ dŚĞ'ĂůůĞƌŝĂ͞dŚĞ,ĂŶƐĞŶ͟ϭϴϬϭ
EŽƌƚŚ
ůĂŵŝŶŽZĞĂů^ĂŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚĞ͕ϵϮϲϳϯ
ƚƚĞŶƚŝŽŶ͗ ƚƚĞŶƚŝŽŶ͗ ƚƚĞŶƚŝŽŶ͗
WĂƵů,ĞƌƌŵĂŶŶ
&ĞŚƌΘWĞĞƌƐ
dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ
WŚ͗ϵϰϵ͘ϯϬϴ͘ϲϯϯϯ
͗ ZĂĐŚĞůEĂƐƌĞ KǁŶĞƌ
WĂƵů͕
dŚĂŶŬǇŽƵĨŽƌŚĞůƉŝŶŐƚŽĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞŽƵƌĞĨĨŽƌƚƐĨŽƌƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐĂŶĚĂŶĂůǇƐĞƐĨŽƌŽƵƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ĞůŽǁŝƐĂƐƵŵŵĂƌǇŽĨŽƵƌ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƚĞĂŵ͛ƐĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĚĞůŝǀĞƌǇĨƌĞƋƵĞŶĐǇĂŶĚƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĨŽƌŽƵƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚΖƐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂů ĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐ͘
tĞŚĂǀĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƵŵŵĂƌǇďĂƐĞĚŽŶŵĂƌŬĞƚƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ͕ŽǁŶĞƌͲŽƉĞƌĂƚŽƌĞǆƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͕ĂŶĚŝŶĚƵƐƚƌǇƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ĂĚǀŝĐĞĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
WƌŽũĞĐƚ^ƵŵŵĂƌǇ͗

ϲϭƌŽŽŵďŽƵƚŝƋƵĞŚŽƚĞů
ϭϬϲWĂƌŬŝŶŐ^ƚĂůůƐŽŶͲƐŝƚĞ
ZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚƐͬ&ŽŽĚĂŶĚĞǀĞƌĂŐĞ͗
ϭ͘ ZŽŽĨƚŽƉZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚϭϯϮ^ĞĂƚƐ
Ϯ͘ >ŽďďǇĂĨĠϯϮ^ĞĂƚƐ;ϴƉĂƚŝŽƐĞĂƚƐŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƉĞƌ^WĂƌŬŝŶŐKƌĚ͘Ϳ ϯ͘ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŝĚĞWŝĐŬͲƵƉtŝŶĚŽǁĂĨĠ;ϴƉĂƚŝŽƐĞĂƚƐ͕ŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůWĂƌŬŝŶŐƉĞƌ^WĂƌŬŝŶŐKƌĚ͘Ϳ ϰ͘ WŽŽů^ŝĚĞĂƌϭϰ^ĞĂƚƐʹ,ŽƚĞů'ƵĞƐƚ^ĞƌǀŝŶŐKŶůǇ;ŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƉĂƌŬŝŶŐͿ ϱ͘ WŽŽůĞĐŬǁŝƚŚнͬͲϯϮ>ŽƵŶŐĞŚĂŝƌƐͲ^ĞƌǀĞĚďǇWŽŽů^ŝĚĞĂƌ;ŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƉĂƌŬŝŶŐͿ ĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚZŽŽŵǁĂƐĂůůŽĐĂƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞKŶƐŝƚĞ>ĂƵŶĚƌǇ&ĂĐŝůŝƚǇ͘ 1106
ϯϮϰϬϮ ƌŽǁŶ sĂůůĞǇ WĂƌŬǁĂǇ ηϭϬϮ Ͳ ĂŶĂ WŽŝŶƚ Ͳ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ Ͳ ϵϮϲϮϵ - ƉŚ͘ ϵϰϵ͘ϯϯϴ͘ϮϲϬϯ - WĂŐĞ Ϯ ŽĨ Ϯ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚdŽƚĂůĞůŝǀĞƌǇ dŽƚĂůĞůŝǀĞƌǇ ĞůŝǀĞƌǇƉĞƌǁĞĞŬ ƉĞƌǁĞĞŬ ƉĞƌǁĞĞŬǁŝůůƌĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵ ƉĞƌǁĞĞŬǁŝůůƌĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵ ǁŝůůƌĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵϭϭƚŽϭϱ͘ ǁŝůůƌĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵϭϭƚŽϭϱ͘ ϭϭƚŽϭϱ͘ ϭϭƚŽϭϱ͘ ,ŽƚĞůĞůŝǀĞƌƐĨŽƌ&ŽŽĚĂŶĚĞǀĞƌĂŐĞĂŶĚ,ŽƚĞůKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗ tĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨĞŝŐŚƚ;ϴͿƚŽƚǁĞůǀĞ;ϭϮͿĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐƉĞƌǁĞĞŬĨŽƌĨŽŽĚĂŶĚďĞǀĞƌĂŐĞ͘ĞůŽǁŝƐĂƐƵŵŵĂƌǇŽĨƚŚĞ ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĚĞůŝǀĞƌǇ͘
dǁŽ;ϮͿ
ĂĐŚĨƌŽŵDĂũŽƌ&ŽŽĚ^ƵƉƉůǇDŽŶĚĂǇƐΘdŚƵƌƐĚĂǇƐ
dŚĞĞ;ϯͿ
ĂĐŚĨƌŽŵ>ŽĐĂůĞĞƌĂŶĚtŝŶĞ;>ŝƋƵŽƌͿƐƵƉƉůŝĞƌƐtŝŶĞϭǆĂŶĚĞĞƌϭǆĂŶĚ>ŝƋƵŽƌϭǆϮ ĂĐŚĨƌŽŵĨƌĞƐŚƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĂŶĚ
ŚĞƌďǀĞŶĚŽƌƐсϮǆǁĞĞŬůǇ
KŶĞ;ϭͿ
ĂĐŚĨƌŽŵŚĞŵŝĐĂůͬ>ĂŶĚƌĞǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĐŽŵƉĂŶǇ;EŽƚĞ͗ŶŽƚĂůůŽĨĨĞƌƚŚĞƐĂŵĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚŝƐƵƐƵĂůůǇĐĂŶďĞĂďƐŽƌďĞĚ ďǇŵĂũŽƌĨŽŽĚƐƵƉƉůŝĞƌƐͿ
,ŽƵƐĞŬĞĞƉŝŶŐĂŶĚ,ŽƚĞů^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞƐƚŚƌĞĞ;ϯͿĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐƉĞƌǁĞĞŬ͕ďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞŽǁŶĞƌͲŽƉĞƌĂƚŽƌΖƐĞǆƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͘ dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂůƉƌŽƚŽĐŽůƐǁŝůůďĞŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĞĚĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞĚĨŽƌĂůůŚŽƚĞůǀĞŶĚŽƌƐ͘ ϭ͘ ĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐǁŝůůďĞŵĂŶĂŐĞĚƚŽďĞŵĂĚĞĚƵƌŝŶŐ͞ŽĨĨͲƉĞĂŬŚŽƵƌƐ͕͟ǁŝƚŚϰϬйďĞŝŶŐŵĂĚĞƉƌŝŽƌƚŽϴ͗ϬϬĂ͘ŵ͘ĂŶĚƚŚĞďĂůĂŶĐĞ ďĞŝŶŐĚŽŶĞŽŶĂŶĂƐƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŝŵĞďůŽĐŬ;ŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƉĞĂŬŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŚŽƵƌƐͿƚŽŚĞůƉĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĂŶĚƐƉƌĞĂĚŽƵƚĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐĂŶĚ ĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƋƵĞƵŝŶŐŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘
Ϯ͘ ĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐǁŝůůďĞŵĂĚĞďǇϮϬ͛ʹϯϬ͛ůŝŐŚƚͲĚƵƚǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚƌƵĐŬƐŽƌ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞsĂŶƐ͘ Ă͘ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞǀĂŶƐ;ůŽĐĂůǀĞŶĚŽƌƐͿŵĂǇƵƐĞŽƵƌŐĂƌĂŐĞĞŶƚƌǇĂŶĚĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚƵƌŶͲĂƌŽƵŶĚƐƚĂůůƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ͘ ϯ͘ dŚĞ,ŽƚĞůǁŝůůŽƉĞƌĂƚĞǁŝƚŚŽŶͲƐŝƚĞůĂƵŶĚƌǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞĚĂŝůǇůĂƵŶĚƌǇƉŝĐŬͲƵƉĂŶĚĚĞůŝǀĞƌǇ͘ Ă͘ ^ŚŽƵůĚůĂƵŶĚƌǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞďĞĐŽŵĞĂƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŽĨĨƵƚƵƌĞŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂůŝŐŚƚͲĚƵƚǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚƌƵĐŬǁŝůůĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂŶĚƉŝĐŬƵƉ ůĂƵŶĚƌǇďĞƚǁĞĞŶϭϬ͗ϬϬƉ͘ŵ͘ĂŶĚϳ͗ϬϬĂ͘ŵ͘
ϰ͘ ƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ͕ĂůůƉŝĐŬͲƵƉƐĂŶĚĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐŵĂǇďĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĚĂƚƚŚĞ,ŽƚĞů͛Ɛ>ŽĂĚŝŶŐƌĞĂĂŶĚͬŽƌƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ͘ ϱ͘ ĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƐƉĂĐĞƐŚĂůůďĞĂůůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚƚŚĞ>ŽďďǇƌĞĂĂŶĚƚŚĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŝĚĞĂĨĠƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞǆƉĞĚŝƚŝŽƵƐĚĞůŝǀĞƌǇǁŚĞŶ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘
ZĞƐƉĞĐƚĨƵůůǇ ƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚ ďǇ͗
:ŽƌĚĞŶ ^ĞŐƌĂǀĞƐ͕ /͕ >

W͕ EZ
WƌŝŶĐŝƉĂů
:KZ
E^
'Zs
^Z,/d
d͗/E͘
ƉŚ ϵϰϵ͘ϯϯϴ͘ϮϲϬϯ
1107
ϯϮϰϬϮ ƌŽǁŶ sĂůůĞǇ WĂƌŬǁĂǇ ηϭϬϮ Ͳ ĂŶĂ WŽŝŶƚ Ͳ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ Ͳ ϵϮϲϮϵ - ƉŚ͘ ϵϰϵ͘ϯϯϴ͘ϮϲϬϯ - WĂŐĞ ϭ ŽĨ Ϯ
ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ŝĨŽƌŶŝĂŽĂƐƚĂů ŽĂƐƚĂů ŽĂƐƚĂů ŽĂƐƚĂůŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶWƌŽũĞĐƚ WƌŽũĞĐƚ WƌŽũĞĐƚZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ ZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ ZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ :ŽďEK͘ϮϬϮϯͲϬϮϬ
d
͗ :ĂŶƵĂƌǇϭϲ͕ϮϬϮϱ
ZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͗ ZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͗ ZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͗ ^WWϮϮ͘ϯϮϭ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϭ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϭ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϭ͕hWϮϮ͘ϯϮϮ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϮ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϮ͕ ϮϮ͘ϯϮϮ͕,WϮϮ͘ϯϮϯ WEη Ϭϱϳ͘ϭϵϭ͘ϲϬ Ϭϱϳ͘ϭϵϭ͘ϲϬ Ϭϱϳ͘ϭϵϭ͘ϲϬ
EͲdƌĂĐƚηϭϰϰϴϲ

WƌŽũĞĐƚ WƌŽũĞĐƚ WƌŽũĞĐƚĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ dŚĞ'ĂůůĞƌŝĂ͞dŚĞ,ĂŶƐĞŶ͟ϭϴϬϭ
EŽƌƚŚ
ůĂŵŝŶŽZĞĂů^ĂŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚĞ͕ϵϮϲϳϯ
ƚƚĞŶƚŝŽŶ͗ ƚƚĞŶƚŝŽŶ͗ ƚƚĞŶƚŝŽŶ͗
WĂƵů,ĞƌƌŵĂŶŶ
&ĞŚƌΘWĞĞƌƐ
dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ
WŚ͗ϵϰϵ͘ϯϬϴ͘ϲϯϯϯ
͗ ZĂĐŚĞůEĂƐƌĞ KǁŶĞƌ
WĂƵů͕
dŚĂŶŬǇŽƵĨŽƌŚĞůƉŝŶŐƚŽĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞŽƵƌĞĨĨŽƌƚƐĨŽƌƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐĂŶĚĂŶĂůǇƐĞƐĨŽƌŽƵƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ĞůŽǁŝƐĂƐƵŵŵĂƌǇŽĨŽƵƌ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƚĞĂŵ͛ƐĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĚĞůŝǀĞƌǇĨƌĞƋƵĞŶĐǇĂŶĚƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĨŽƌŽƵƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚΖƐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂů ĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐ͘
tĞŚĂǀĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƵŵŵĂƌǇďĂƐĞĚŽŶŵĂƌŬĞƚƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ͕ŽǁŶĞƌͲŽƉĞƌĂƚŽƌĞǆƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͕ĂŶĚŝŶĚƵƐƚƌǇƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ĂĚǀŝĐĞĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
WƌŽũĞĐƚ^ƵŵŵĂƌǇ͗

ϲϭƌŽŽŵďŽƵƚŝƋƵĞŚŽƚĞů
ϭϬϲWĂƌŬŝŶŐ^ƚĂůůƐŽŶͲƐŝƚĞ
ZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚƐͬ&ŽŽĚĂŶĚĞǀĞƌĂŐĞ͗
ϭ͘ ZŽŽĨƚŽƉZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚϭϯϮ^ĞĂƚƐ
Ϯ͘ >ŽďďǇĂĨĠϯϮ^ĞĂƚƐ;ϴƉĂƚŝŽƐĞĂƚƐŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƉĞƌ^WĂƌŬŝŶŐKƌĚ͘Ϳ ϯ͘ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŝĚĞWŝĐŬͲƵƉtŝŶĚŽǁĂĨĠ;ϴƉĂƚŝŽƐĞĂƚƐ͕ŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůWĂƌŬŝŶŐƉĞƌ^WĂƌŬŝŶŐKƌĚ͘Ϳ ϰ͘ WŽŽů^ŝĚĞĂƌϭϰ^ĞĂƚƐʹ,ŽƚĞů'ƵĞƐƚ^ĞƌǀŝŶŐKŶůǇ;ŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƉĂƌŬŝŶŐͿ ϱ͘ WŽŽůĞĐŬǁŝƚŚнͬͲϯϮ>ŽƵŶŐĞŚĂŝƌƐͲ^ĞƌǀĞĚďǇWŽŽů^ŝĚĞĂƌ;ŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƉĂƌŬŝŶŐͿ ĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚZŽŽŵǁĂƐĂůůŽĐĂƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞKŶƐŝƚĞ>ĂƵŶĚƌǇ&ĂĐŝůŝƚǇ͘ dŚĞ,ĂŶƐĞŶWƌŽƉŽƐĞĚWƌŽũĞĐƚĞůŝǀĞƌǇ
1108
ϯϮϰϬϮ ƌŽǁŶ sĂůůĞǇ WĂƌŬǁĂǇ ηϭϬϮ Ͳ ĂŶĂ WŽŝŶƚ Ͳ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ Ͳ ϵϮϲϮϵ - ƉŚ͘ ϵϰϵ͘ϯϯϴ͘ϮϲϬϯ - WĂŐĞ Ϯ ŽĨ Ϯ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚdŽƚĂůĞůŝǀĞƌǇ dŽƚĂůĞůŝǀĞƌǇ ĞůŝǀĞƌǇƉĞƌǁĞĞŬ ƉĞƌǁĞĞŬ ƉĞƌǁĞĞŬǁŝůůƌĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵ ƉĞƌǁĞĞŬǁŝůůƌĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵ ǁŝůůƌĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵϭϭƚŽϭϱ͘ ǁŝůůƌĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵϭϭƚŽϭϱ͘ ϭϭƚŽϭϱ͘ ϭϭƚŽϭϱ͘ ,ŽƚĞůĞůŝǀĞƌƐĨŽƌ&ŽŽĚĂŶĚĞǀĞƌĂŐĞĂŶĚ,ŽƚĞůKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗ tĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨĞŝŐŚƚ;ϴͿƚŽƚǁĞůǀĞ;ϭϮͿĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐƉĞƌǁĞĞŬĨŽƌĨŽŽĚĂŶĚďĞǀĞƌĂŐĞ͘ĞůŽǁŝƐĂƐƵŵŵĂƌǇŽĨƚŚĞ ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĚĞůŝǀĞƌǇ͘
dǁŽ;ϮͿ
ĂĐŚĨƌŽŵDĂũŽƌ&ŽŽĚ^ƵƉƉůǇDŽŶĚĂǇƐΘdŚƵƌƐĚĂǇƐ
dŚĞĞ;ϯͿ
ĂĐŚĨƌŽŵ>ŽĐĂůĞĞƌĂŶĚtŝŶĞ;>ŝƋƵŽƌͿƐƵƉƉůŝĞƌƐtŝŶĞϭǆĂŶĚĞĞƌϭǆĂŶĚ>ŝƋƵŽƌϭǆϮ ĂĐŚĨƌŽŵĨƌĞƐŚƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĂŶĚ
ŚĞƌďǀĞŶĚŽƌƐсϮǆǁĞĞŬůǇ
KŶĞ;ϭͿ
ĂĐŚĨƌŽŵŚĞŵŝĐĂůͬ>ĂŶĚƌĞǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĐŽŵƉĂŶǇ;EŽƚĞ͗ŶŽƚĂůůŽĨĨĞƌƚŚĞƐĂŵĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚŝƐƵƐƵĂůůǇĐĂŶďĞĂďƐŽƌďĞĚ ďǇŵĂũŽƌĨŽŽĚƐƵƉƉůŝĞƌƐͿ
,ŽƵƐĞŬĞĞƉŝŶŐĂŶĚ,ŽƚĞů^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞƐƚŚƌĞĞ;ϯͿĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐƉĞƌǁĞĞŬ͕ďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞŽǁŶĞƌͲŽƉĞƌĂƚŽƌΖƐĞǆƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͘ dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂůƉƌŽƚŽĐŽůƐǁŝůůďĞŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĞĚĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞĚĨŽƌĂůůŚŽƚĞůǀĞŶĚŽƌƐ͘ ϭ͘ ĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐǁŝůůďĞŵĂŶĂŐĞĚƚŽďĞŵĂĚĞĚƵƌŝŶŐ͞ŽĨĨͲƉĞĂŬŚŽƵƌƐ͕͟ǁŝƚŚϰϬйďĞŝŶŐŵĂĚĞƉƌŝŽƌƚŽϴ͗ϬϬĂ͘ŵ͘ĂŶĚƚŚĞďĂůĂŶĐĞ ďĞŝŶŐĚŽŶĞŽŶĂŶĂƐƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŝŵĞďůŽĐŬ;ŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƉĞĂŬŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŚŽƵƌƐͿƚŽŚĞůƉĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĂŶĚƐƉƌĞĂĚŽƵƚĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐĂŶĚ ĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƋƵĞƵŝŶŐŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘
Ϯ͘ ĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐǁŝůůďĞŵĂĚĞďǇϮϬ͛ʹϯϬ͛ůŝŐŚƚͲĚƵƚǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚƌƵĐŬƐŽƌ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞsĂŶƐ͘ Ă͘ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞǀĂŶƐ;ůŽĐĂůǀĞŶĚŽƌƐͿŵĂǇƵƐĞŽƵƌŐĂƌĂŐĞĞŶƚƌǇĂŶĚĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚƵƌŶͲĂƌŽƵŶĚƐƚĂůůƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ͘ ϯ͘ dŚĞ,ŽƚĞůǁŝůůŽƉĞƌĂƚĞǁŝƚŚŽŶͲƐŝƚĞůĂƵŶĚƌǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞĚĂŝůǇůĂƵŶĚƌǇƉŝĐŬͲƵƉĂŶĚĚĞůŝǀĞƌǇ͘ Ă͘ ^ŚŽƵůĚůĂƵŶĚƌǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞďĞĐŽŵĞĂƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŽĨĨƵƚƵƌĞŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂůŝŐŚƚͲĚƵƚǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚƌƵĐŬǁŝůůĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂŶĚƉŝĐŬƵƉ ůĂƵŶĚƌǇďĞƚǁĞĞŶϭϬ͗ϬϬƉ͘ŵ͘ĂŶĚϳ͗ϬϬĂ͘ŵ͘
ϰ͘ ƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ͕ĂůůƉŝĐŬͲƵƉƐĂŶĚĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐŵĂǇďĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĚĂƚƚŚĞ,ŽƚĞů͛Ɛ>ŽĂĚŝŶŐƌĞĂĂŶĚͬŽƌƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ͘ ϱ͘ ĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƐƉĂĐĞƐŚĂůůďĞĂůůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚƚŚĞ>ŽďďǇƌĞĂĂŶĚƚŚĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŝĚĞĂĨĠƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞǆƉĞĚŝƚŝŽƵƐĚĞůŝǀĞƌǇǁŚĞŶ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘
ZĞƐƉĞĐƚĨƵůůǇ ƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚ ďǇ͗
:ŽƌĚĞŶ ^ĞŐƌĂǀĞƐ͕ /͕ >

W͕ EZ
WƌŝŶĐŝƉĂů
:KZ
E^
'Zs
^Z,/d
d͗/E͘
ƉŚ ϵϰϵ͘ϯϯϴ͘ϮϲϬϯ
1109
APPENDIX H.2
VMT Screening Assessment
1110
This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. 1111
ϮϭϬϵϯϱʹ,ĂŶƐŽŶ,ŽƚĞů WĂŐĞϭŽĨϵ
dĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůDĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵ
&ĞďƌƵĂƌǇϮ͕ϮϬϮϲ
dŽ͗ <ƌŝƐƚĞŶŽŐƵĞ͕DŝĐŚĂĞůĂŬĞƌ/ŶƚĞƌŶĂƚŝŽŶĂů
&ƌŽŵ͗ :ŽƌĚĂŶ'ƌĂǇW
d
͕DŝĐŚĂĞůĂŬĞƌ/ŶƚĞƌŶĂƚŝŽŶĂů
Subject: San Clemente 1801 N. El Camino Real - VMT Screening Assessment
Introduction
dŚĞ ƉƵƌƉŽƐĞ ŽĨ ƚŚŝƐ ŵĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵ ŝƐ ƚŽ ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚ Ă ǀĞŚŝĐůĞ ŵŝůĞƐ ƚƌĂǀĞůĞĚ ;sDdͿ ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ,ĂŶƐŽŶ,ŽƚĞů;WƌŽũĞĐƚͿŝŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů
YƵĂůŝƚǇĐƚ;
YͿĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐ͘^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůǇ͕ĂsDdƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐŝƐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐŵĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵ͘dŚĞ WƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞƐƚŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĂƚŚƌĞĞͲƐƚŽƌǇ͕ϲϭͲƌŽŽŵŚŽƚĞů͕ǁŝƚŚĂƚŚŝƌĚͲĨůŽŽƌƌŽŽĨƚŽƉƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚĂŶĚďĂƌ͕ ƚǁŽ ĐĂĨĞƐ͕ ƉŽŽů ǁŝƚŚ Ă ďĂƌ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ͕ ĂŶĚ Ă ƚǁŽͲůĞǀĞů ƐƵďƚĞƌƌĂŶĞĂŶ ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ǁŝƚŚ ƐŝƚĞ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐǁĂůůƐ͕ŚĂƌĚƐĐĂƉĞ͕ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŚĞ ŝƚǇƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇ͘
dĂďůĞϭƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐŬĞǇWƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͘
ǆŚŝďŝƚϭƐŚŽǁƐƚŚĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚ
ǆŚŝďŝƚϮƐŚŽǁƐƚŚĞ
ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚƵĂůƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶ͘
Table 1 – Project Information Summary
/ƚĞŵ ĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ
WƌŽũĞĐƚdŝƚůĞ ,ĂŶƐŽŶ,ŽƚĞů
WƌŽũĞĐƚ>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ
ϭϴϬϭE͘
ůĂŵŝŶŽZĞĂů
EŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨ
ůĂŵŝŶŽZĞĂůĂŶĚ
͘ǀĞŶŝĚĂWŝĐŽ͕ŝŶƚŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ^ĂŶůĞŵĞŶƚĞ͕
KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚǇ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘
^ƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐhƐĞƐ
dŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐŝƚĞŝƐďŽƌĚĞƌĞĚďǇĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƵƐĞƐƚŽƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĂŶĚĞĂƐƚ͕ŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ ĂŶĚWŝĐŽWĂƌŬƚŽƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĂŶĚǁĞƐƚ͘^ĂŶůĞŵĞŶƚĞDĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚ ĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϰϬϬĨĞĞƚƚŽƚŚĞǁĞƐƚŽŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚƐŝĚĞŽĨ ůĂŵŝŶŽZĞĂů͘

ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐhƐĞ dŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐŝƚĞŝƐǀĂĐĂŶƚĂŶĚƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚ͘ WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚhƐĞ
dŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚǁŽƵůĚĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŽĨĂƚŚƌĞĞͲƐƚŽƌǇ͕ϲϭͲƌŽŽŵŚŽƚĞů͕ǁŝƚŚĂƚŚŝƌĚͲĨůŽŽƌƌŽŽĨƚŽƉ ƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚĂŶĚďĂƌ͕ƚǁŽĐĂĨĞƐ͕ƉŽŽůǁŝƚŚĂďĂƌĂŶĚƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ͕ĂŶĚĂƚǁŽͲůĞǀĞů ƐƵďƚĞƌƌĂŶĞĂŶƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝƚŚƐŝƚĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐǁĂůůƐ͕ŚĂƌĚƐĐĂƉĞ͕ ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŚĞŝƚǇƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇ͘ 1112
ϮϭϬϵϯϱʹ,ĂŶƐŽŶ,ŽƚĞů WĂŐĞϮŽĨϵ
Project Trip Generation
dŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞƚƌŝƉƐǁĞƌĞĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ&ŽĐƵƐĞĚdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ^ƚƵĚǇƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚďǇ&ĞŚƌΘWĞĞƌƐŽŶ :ĂŶƵĂƌǇ ϭϳ͕ ϮϬϮϱ ƵŶĚĞƌĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞ ĐŽǀĞƌĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ͘Ɛ ƐƵŵŵĂƌŝǌĞĚŝŶ ƚŚŝƐ ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞ ƌĞƉŽƌƚ͕ƚŚĞƚƌŝƉŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĞƋƵĂƚŝŽŶƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ/ŶƐƚŝƚƵƚĞŽĨdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌƐ͛;/d
ͿdƌŝƉ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ
DĂŶƵĂůϭϭƚŚ
ĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘dĂďůĞϮƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚŚĞƚƌŝƉŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĞƋƵĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌĂŚŽƚĞůƵƐĞ;/d >ĂŶĚhƐĞŽĚĞϯϭϬͿ͕
ĨŝŶĞ ĚŝŶŝŶŐƵƐĞ ;/d
>ĂŶĚhƐĞ ŽĚĞ ϵϯϭͿ͕ĂŶĚ ĐĂĨĠ ƵƐĞ ;/d
>ĂŶĚhƐĞ ŽĚĞ ϵϯϲͿ͘ dĂďůĞ ϯ ƐƵŵŵĂƌŝǌĞƐ ƚŚĞ
ǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌƚƌŝƉŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĞĐĂƐƚƚŽďĞŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ ƐƐŚŽǁŶŝŶdĂďůĞϯ͕ĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞǁĞĞŬĚĂǇ͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚWƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĨŽƌĞĐĂƐƚƚŽŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϭ͕ϲϯϭ ĚĂŝůǇƚƌŝƉƐǁŝƚŚϱϳDWĞĂŬ,ŽƵƌƚƌŝƉƐ;ϯϮŝŶďŽƵŶĚͬϮϱŽƵƚďŽƵŶĚͿ͕ĂŶĚϲϱWDWĞĂŬ,ŽƵƌƚƌŝƉƐ;ϯϲŝŶďŽƵŶĚ ͬϮϵŽƵƚďŽƵŶĚͿ͘
dĂďůĞϮʹ/d
dƌŝƉ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ
>ĂŶĚhƐĞ /d
>ĂŶĚhƐĞ
ŽĚĞ;ϭͿ ĂŝůǇ DWĞĂŬ,ŽƵƌ WDWĞĂŬ,ŽƵƌ
dŽƚĂů /Ŷ ͗ KƵƚ dŽƚĂů /Ŷ ͗ KƵƚ
,ŽƚĞů ϯϭϬ ϱ͘ϴϰͬZŽŽŵ Ϭ͘ϰϲͬZŽŽŵ ϱϲй ͗ ϰϰй Ϭ͘ϱϵͬZŽŽŵ ϱϭй ͗ ϰϵй &ŝŶĞŝŶŝŶŐ ϵϯϭ ϴϯ͘ϴϰͬ<^& ;ϮͿ Ϭ͘ϳϯͬ<^&;ϮͿͲ ͗ Ͳ ϳ͘ϴϬͬ<^&;ϮͿ ϲϳй ͗ ϯϯй ĂĨĠ;WƵďůŝĐtĂůŬͲhƉͿ ϵϯϲ Ͳ ͬ<^& ;ϮͿ ϵϯ͘Ϭϴͬ<^&;ϮͿ ϱϭй ͗ ϰϵй ϯϮ͘Ϯϵͬ<^&;ϮͿ ϱϬй ͗ ϱϬй ;ϭͿ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗/d
dƌŝƉ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶDĂŶƵĂů͕ϭϭƚŚ
ĚŝƚŝŽŶ;/ŶƐƚŝƚƵƚĞŽĨdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌƐ͕ϮϬϮϭͿ
;ϮͿ<^&сϭ͕ϬϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ
dĂďůĞϯʹWƌŽũĞĐƚdƌŝƉ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ
>ĂŶĚhƐĞ /ŶƚĞŶƐŝƚǇ ĂŝůǇ
dƌŝƉƐ
DWĞĂŬ,ŽƵƌ WDWĞĂŬ,ŽƵƌ
sŽůƵŵĞ /ŶďŽƵŶĚ KƵƚďŽƵŶĚ sŽůƵŵĞ /ŶďŽƵŶĚ KƵƚďŽƵŶĚ
,ŽƚĞů ϲϭ ZŽŽŵƐ ϰϴϳ Ϯϴ ϭϲ ϭϮ ϯϲ ϭϴ ϭϴ
&ŝŶĞŝŶŝŶŐ Ϯ͘ϱϰ <^&;ϭͿ Ϯϭϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϭ ϮϬ ϭϯ ϳ
ĂĨĠ;WƵďůŝĐtĂůŬͲhƉͿ Ϭ͘Ϯϵ <^&;ϭͿ ϵϯϭ Ϯϳ ϭϰ ϭϯ ϵ ϱ ϰ
dŽƚĂůdƌŝƉ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ ϭ͕ϲϯϭ ϱϳ ϯϮ Ϯϱ ϲϱ ϯϲ Ϯϵ
;ϭͿ<^&сϭ͕ϬϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ
VMT Assessment Guidelines & Methodology
dŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ^ĂŶůĞŵĞŶƚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŚĂǀĞƚŚĞŝƌŽǁŶĂĚŽƉƚĞĚsDdŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ͘dŚĞƉƌŝŵĂƌǇƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ ĨŽƌƚŚŝƐsDdƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŝƐƚŚĞKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚǇ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĨŽƌ ǀĂůƵĂƚŝŶŐsDdhŶĚĞƌ
Y;ŽƵŶƚǇ
'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐͿĂŶĚƚŚĞ'ŽǀĞƌŶŽƌ͛ƐKĨĨŝĐĞŽĨWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĂŶĚZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ;KWZͿdĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůĚǀŝƐŽƌǇ;dͿŽŶ ǀĂůƵĂƚŝŶŐ
dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ/ŵƉĂĐƚƐ ĨŽƌ
Y͘ƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶ ƚŚĞŽƵŶƚǇ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ͕ĐĞƌƚĂŝŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ďĞĐĂƵƐĞŽĨ ƚŚĞŝƌ ƐŝǌĞ͕ŶĂƚƵƌĞ͕ŽƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂƌĞĞǆĞŵƉƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽĨƉƌĞƉĂƌŝŶŐĂĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚsDdĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐĂŶĚĐĂŶďĞ ƉƌĞƐƵŵĞĚƚŽŚĂǀĞĂůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚďĂƐĞĚŽŶĐĞƌƚĂŝŶƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘ Screening Criteria

ĂĐŚŽĨƚŚĞƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŽƵŶƚǇ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐǁĞƌĞĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚWƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚ ƚŚĞƌĞƐƵůƚƐĂƌĞƐƵŵŵĂƌŝǌĞĚŝŶdĂďůĞϰ͘ƐƐŚŽǁŶ͕ƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚŵĞĞƚƐƚŚĞƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞ͞^ŵĂůů WƌŽũĞĐƚ͟ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝŽŶ ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ ďĞůŽǁ͘ dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ Ă ĨƵůů sDd ĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐ ŝƐ EKd ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ WƌŽũĞĐƚ ŝƐ ƉƌĞƐƵŵĞĚƚŽŚĂǀĞĂůĞƐƐͲƚŚĂŶͲƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͘ 1113
ϮϭϬϵϯϱʹ,ĂŶƐŽŶ,ŽƚĞů WĂŐĞϯŽĨϵ
d>
ϰ ʹ sDd ^Z

E/E'Z/d
Z/^hDDZz
^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂϭ WƌŽũĞĐƚ
ǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ ZĞƐƵůƚ
WƌŽũĞĐƚƐ
>ŽĐĂƚĞĚEĞĂƌ
dƌĂŶƐŝƚ
WĞƌKWZ͛ƐdĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůĚǀŝƐŽƌǇ͕ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů͕ ƌĞƚĂŝů͕ŽĨĨŝĐĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕Žƌ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞĂŵŝǆŽĨƚŚŽƐĞƵƐĞƐǁŚŽƐĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐ ĂƌĞǁŝƚŚŝŶŽŶĞŚĂůĨŵŝůĞŽĨĂŶĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŵĂũŽƌƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐƚŽƉ͕ƉůĂŶŶĞĚ ŵĂũŽƌ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ƐƚŽƉ͕ Žƌ Ă ƐƚŽƉͬƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ĐĞŶƚĞƌ ĂůŽŶŐ Ă ŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚǇ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ ǁŽƵůĚ ŶŽƌŵĂůůǇ ďĞ ƉƌĞƐƵŵĞĚ ƚŽ ŚĂǀĞ Ă ůĞƐƐ ƚŚĂŶ ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŝŵƉĂĐƚ͘hŶůĞƐƐƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐŝŶĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ZdWͬ^^͕ ŚĂƐ Ă ĨůŽŽƌͲƚŽͲĂƌĞĂͲƌĂƚŝŽ ;&ZͿ ůĞƐƐ ƚŚĂŶ Ϭ͘ϳϱ͕ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂŶĞǆĐĞƐƐŝǀĞĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͕ŽƌƌĞĚƵĐĞƐƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨ ĂĨĨŽƌĚĂďůĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůƵŶŝƚƐ͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶ ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ͘
dŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶŽŶĞŚĂůĨŵŝůĞŽĨĂŶ
ĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŵĂũŽƌƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ
ƐƚŽƉĂŶĚŚĂƐĂ&ZŽĨ
Ϭ͘ϵϯϳ͕ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚ
ƚŚĞZdWͬ^^͕ĂŶĚĚŽĞƐ
ŶŽƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĞǆĐĞƐƐŝǀĞ
ĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚ
ĚŽĞƐŶŽƚƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞ
ŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĂĨĨŽƌĚĂďůĞ
ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůƵŶŝƚƐ͘;^ĞĞ

ǆŚŝďŝƚϯͿ
^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ
ƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ/Ɛ
DĞƚ
EĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ
ZĞƚĂŝůWƌŽũĞĐƚ
dŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ŝŶǀŽůǀĞƐ ůŽĐĂůͲƐĞƌǀŝŶŐ ƌĞƚĂŝů ƐƉĂĐĞ ŽĨ ůĞƐƐ ƚŚĂŶ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ ƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͘
dŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚĚŽĞƐŶŽƚ
ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞůŽĐĂůƌĞƚĂŝů͘
dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƚŚŝƐĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ
ĚŽĞƐŶŽƚĂƉƉůǇ͘
^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ
ƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ/Ɛ
EŽƚDĞƚ
ĨĨŽƌĚĂďůĞ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
WƌŽũĞĐƚƐ
ŽƵŶƚǇ ŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ ĂůůŽǁƐ ĨŽƌ Ă ůĞƐƐ ƚŚĂŶ ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ ĨŝŶĚŝŶŐ ĨŽƌ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ ŽĨ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĂƌĞ ϭϬϬй ĂĨĨŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐ͘
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĂŚŽƚĞůĂŶĚ
ŝƐŶŽƚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚ
ĂĨĨŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘
^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ
ƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ/Ɛ
EŽƚDĞƚ
>ŽǁsDdƌĞĂ
WĞƌ ŽƵŶƚǇ 'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ͕ ŝĨ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ŝƐ ŝŶ Ă >Žǁ sDd ĂƌĞĂ͕ ĂŶĚ ŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞƐ ƐŝŵŝůĂƌ ĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ ;ŝ͘Ğ͕͘ ĚĞŶƐŝƚǇ͕ ŵŝǆ ŽĨ ƵƐĞƐ͕ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚǇͿ͕ ŝƚ ĐĂŶ ďĞ ƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůǇ ƉƌĞƐƵŵĞĚ ƚŚĂƚ ŝƚ ǁŝůů ĞǆŚŝďŝƚ ƐŝŵŝůĂƌůǇůŽǁsDd͘;^ĞĞ
ǆŚŝďŝƚϰͿ
dŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞŝƐŶŽƚ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶĂůŽǁsDdĂƌĞĂ͘
^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ
ƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ/Ɛ
EŽƚDĞƚ
^ŵĂůůWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ
WĞƌƚŚĞŽƵŶƚǇ͛Ɛ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ͕ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƐŵĂůůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ǁŝƚŚƵƉƚŽϱϬϬdĚƵĞƚŽƚŚĞĐŽŵŵŽŶ','ĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐƚŚƌĞƐŚŽůĚƐ ŽĨϯ͕ϬϬϬŵĞƚƌŝĐƚŽŶƐ;DdͿŽĨĐĂƌďŽŶĚŝŽǆŝĚĞĞƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚ;KϮ ͿƉĞƌ
ǇĞĂƌ͘dŚĞ ŽƵŶƚǇ ƐƚĂƚĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ǀĞŚŝĐůĞ ĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ ĂƌĞ ƚǇƉŝĐĂůůǇŵŽƌĞ ƚŚĂŶϱϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƚŽƚĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚ','ĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͘dŚƵƐ͕ĂƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ǁŝƚŚ ϱϬϬ d ǁŽƵůĚ ŐĞŶĞƌĂůůǇ ŚĂǀĞ ƚŽƚĂů ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĐŽƵůĚďĞůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϭ͕ϯϬϬDdKϮ
ͬǇĞĂƌ͘
dŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĞǆƉĞĐƚĞĚ
ƚŽŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞϭ͕ϲϯϭd͕
ǁŚŝĐŚŝƐĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞ
ŽƵŶƚǇ͛ƐϱϬϬd
ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚ͘
^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ
ƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ/Ɛ
EŽƚDĞƚ
1114
ϮϭϬϵϯϱʹ,ĂŶƐŽŶ,ŽƚĞů WĂŐĞϰŽĨϵ
d>
ϰ ʹ sDd ^Z

E/E'Z/d
Z/^hDDZz
^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂϭ WƌŽũĞĐƚ
ǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ ZĞƐƵůƚ
>ŽĐĂůͲ^ĞƌǀŝŶŐ
WƵďůŝĐ&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ
^ŝŵŝůĂƌ ƚŽ ƌĞƚĂŝů ůĂŶĚ ƵƐĞƐ͕ ůŽĐĂůͲƐĞƌǀŝŶŐ ƉƵďůŝĐ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ ĂƌĞ ƉƌĞƐƵŵĞĚƚŽŚĂǀĞĂůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶsDd͘dŚŝƐǁŽƵůĚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ ŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚ ƚŽ ƐĞƌǀĞ ƚŚĞ ůŽĐĂů ƉƵďůŝĐ͕ ƉĂƌŬƐ͕ƉƵďůŝĐĞůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌǇƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ƉƵďůŝĐŵŝĚĚůĞƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐ ŚŝŐŚƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͘
dŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐŶŽƚ
ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚĂůŽĐĂůͲ
ƐĞƌǀŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐĨĂĐŝůŝƚǇ͘
dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƚŚŝƐĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ
ĚŽĞƐŶŽƚĂƉƉůǇ͘
^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ
ƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ/Ɛ
EŽƚDĞƚ
^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗ 'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĨŽƌ
ǀĂůƵĂƚŝŶŐsĞŚŝĐůĞDŝůĞƐdƌĂǀĞůĞĚhŶĚĞƌ
YĨŽƌƚŚĞŽƵŶƚǇŽĨKƌĂŶŐĞ;ϮϬϮϬͿ͕'ŽǀĞƌŶŽƌ͛ƐKĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐĂŶĚZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ;KWZͿdĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůĚǀŝƐŽƌǇ;dͿŽŶ ǀĂůƵĂƚŝŶŐdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ/ŵƉĂĐƚƐŝŶ
Y
Conclusion
dŚĞsDdĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŝŶ^ĂŶůĞŵĞŶƚĞƐŚŽǁƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚŵĞĞƚƐƚŚĞƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂƵŶĚĞƌ͞WƌŽũĞĐƚƐ>ŽĐĂƚĞĚEĞĂƌdƌĂŶƐŝƚ͘͟dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐƉƌĞƐƵŵĞĚƚŽƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶĂůĞƐƐͲƚŚĂŶͲ ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŝŵƉĂĐƚƵŶĚĞƌ
YĂŶĚĂĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚsDdĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐŝƐŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘
1115
Exhibit 1
Regional Project Area
H:\pdata\210935\Admin\Reports\Environmental\Tech Studies\VMT Screening\exhibits Not to Scale
December 2025
1116
Not to Scale
Exhibit 2
Site Plan
H:\pdata\210935\Admin\Reports\Environmental\Tech Studies\VMT Screening\exhibits December 2025
1117
Exhibit 3
County of Orange Transit Priority Areas
Project Site
Source:

CEQA Transportation Thresholds of Significance Guide
H:\pdata\210935\Admin\Reports\Environmental\Tech Studies\VMT Screening\exhibits Not to Scale
December 2025
1118
Exhibit 4
Existing VMT Per Capita by TAZ
Project Site
Source: Orange County Transportation Demand Management Plan Appendix 3: Geographic Needs Assessment Memorandum, June 2024 H:\pdata\210935\Admin\Reports\Environmental\Tech Studies\VMT Screening\exhibits Not to Scale
December 2025
1119
ϮϭϬϵϯϱʹ,ĂŶƐŽŶ,ŽƚĞů WĂŐĞϵŽĨϵ
dd,D
Ed
1120

101 Pacifia | Suite 300 | Irvine, CA 92618 | (949) 308-6300 | Fax (951) 684-4324 www.fehrandpeers.com Memorandum
Date: January 17, 2025
To: Jorden Segraves, Jorden Segraves Architect Inc.

From: Paul Herrmann, P.E.

Joshua Geronimo
Subject: The Hansen Hotel – Focused Transportation Study OC24-1095
Fehr & Peers completed a focused transportation study for the Hansen Hotel development project (Project) in the City of San Clemente, California. This scope of this assessment was coordinated with City staff and approved on December 12, 2024. This assessment evaluates the effect of Project traffic on City transportation infrastructure and concludes that improvements are not needed to meet City standards/requirements on Level of Service (LOS), queueing capacity, or traffic signal warrants.

Project Description
The Hansen Hotel project proposes a 61-room hotel with 2.54 KSF of restaurant space and 0.29 KSF of a public walk-up café. There are amenities such as a poolside lounge and bar, and a lobby café that are exclusive to hotel guests.

The Project site plan is provided as Appendix A. The project is located at the northwest corner of Avenida Pico and El Camino Real, with right-in/right-out driveway access along the north side of El Camino Real.

The Project anticipates 11-15 deliveries per week during off-peak hours, with additional detail provided in Appendix F.

ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT 16
1121
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 2 of 8 ends

Data Collection
Fehr & Peers collected the following traffic data in support of the assessment.

ATTACHMENT A
1122
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 3 of 8 ends

to estimate the daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trips associated with the Project in Table

1.KSF = 1,000 square feet

As presented in Table 2, the Project is expected to generate approximately 1,631 daily trips, including 57 trips (32 in/25 out) in the AM peak hour and 65 trips (36 in/29 out) in the PM peak hour.

ATTACHMENT A
1123
550 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1200
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
T: (415) 552-7272 F: (415) 552-5816
www.smwlaw.com
GABRIEL M.B. ROSS
Attorney
[email protected]
April 21, 2026
Via Electronic Mail
Members of the City Council
c/o Laura Campagnolo, City Clerk
City of San Clemente
910 Calle Negocio
San Clemente, CA 92673
E-Mail: [email protected]
Re: Supplement to Appeal Justification for Hanson Hotel (1801 N. El Camino Real); Agenda Item 8A, De Novo Appeal Hearing of Public Hearing Project 25-323, Development Permit 25-324, and
Conditional Use Permit 25-329
Dear Councilmembers:

On behalf of UNITE HERE Local 11 (“Local 11” or “Appellant”), we respectfully submit this supplemental justification of the appeal filed September 2, 2025 (“Appeal”) of the City of San Clemente (“City”) Planning Commission’s August 20, 2025 approvals of Development Permit No. 25-324 and Conditional Use Permit 25-329 (collectively, “Entitlements”) and associated findings under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), concerning the proposed Hanson Hotel (“the Project”).

Local 11, through its counsel the Law Office of Jordan R. Sisson, previously submitted extensive comments in opposition to the Project approvals in its appeal justification dated September 2, 2025 (“Appeal Letter”). The Appeal Letter identified serious deficiencies in the Planning Commission’s approvals of the Entitlements and the Project’s CEQA findings which merited denial of the permits. The City has failed to address the concerns identified in the Appeal Letter, in many cases failing to respond at all. This supplemental letter fully incorporates by reference the Appeal Letter and all exhibits thereto.

In addition, the City has introduced several new justifications for the Project approvals, none of which resolve the Project’s inadequacies under CEQA, the Attachment 5
1124
City Council
April 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

City’s General Plan, and the California Coastal Act (“Coastal Act”).1 It also fails to so much as mention a critical new development: the apparently unauthorized removal of vegetation on the Project site, including native coastal sage scrub, in January 2026.2 The Project as proposed will likely have significant, adverse effects on the natural and human environment in the City. It could result in potentially devastating effects to special-status species and protected habitats in the Marblehead/Sea Summit open space preserve while generating significant local traffic and noise. This should be unsurprising. The Project site is on one of the only mixed use-zoned parcels in the City that directly adjoins an open space area. It is possibly the only mixed use parcel in the City that is adjacent to Coastal Act-protected Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (“ESHA”). And there is a strong possibility that the site itself meets the criteria to be deemed ESHA by the California Coastal Commission (“Coastal Commission”), which would preclude essentially all development.

The City must therefore take exceptional care to ensure that development of the site, if it is appropriate at all, avoids impacting these sensitive resources. Because the City has failed to address these critical questions and recent developments, the City should grant the Appeal and withhold approving the Entitlements until the applicant prepares a full environmental impact report (“EIR”) and demonstrates consistency with applicable General Plan and Coastal Act policies.

I. The City cannot find that the Project is “exempt” from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines section 15183 because that section is not a CEQA exemption.

As the Appeal Letter discussed, the Project cannot evade further CEQA review by relying on a mitigated negative declaration from a previous development proposal for the 1 The agenda for the appeal hearing was released on April 15, 2026, allowing less than a week to review the thousand-page long CEQA findings document prior to the April 21, 2026 deadline for written comments. Our comments here provide an overview of the document’s deficiencies, while Local 11 reserves the right to submit further oral comments at the hearing. See San Clemente Municipal Code § 17.12.140.E (body hearing appeal may consider new evidence and issues outside those raised in the appeal document).
2 The factual details of this vegetation removal are outlined in the letter submitted to the Council on April 15, 2026 by the California Native Plant Society (“CNPS Letter”), attached hereto as Attachment 1. We have separately attached photos depicting the vegetation removal as Attachment 2.
1125
City Council
April 21, 2026

Page 3 ends

Project site because conditions have changed. Agenda Packet 3 (“AP”) 64, 69-70. Nor can the City find that the Project is exempt from CEQA under a Class 32 categorical exemption, because, as the City admits, the Project’s purported lack of significant impacts results from future project-specific mitigation measures. AP 70. The City has apparently abandoned these arguments, because it now asserts that it is “not relying on the 1998 Mitigated Negative Declaration or a Class 32 categorical exemption.” AP 7.

Instead, the staff report now recommends the Council find the Project “exempt” from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines4 section 15183 because the Project is allegedly consistent with the allowable density for its parcel under the City’s General Plan and its accompanying Program EIR (“General Plan EIR”). AP 8. The proposed Council resolution too includes findings that the Project is “exempt” from CEQA under this section. AP 11-12.

The City cannot find this, or any, project “exempt” from CEQA under this provision. Section 15183 is not an exemption. Rather, it allows certain projects that are consistent with an adopted general plan to rely on prior environmental review when, and only when, the agency demonstrates that the effects of the project were adequately analyzed in the prior EIR and that the project will not result in project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or its site. CEQA Guidelines § 15183(a). It imposes an affirmative obligation on the lead agency to demonstrate, based on substantial evidence in the record, that the project’s environmental effects were adequately analyzed in the prior EIR and that no project-specific significant effects peculiar to the site exist.

As discussed below, the record lacks substantial evidence to qualify this Project for streamlined review.

II. The Project does not qualify for streamlined review under CEQA Guidelines section 15183 because there is no demonstration of consistency with the Coastal LUP.

Having accepted that the Project is subject to CEQA, the City attempts to truncate its environmental review using CEQA Guidelines section 15183. That streamlining provision only applies to projects that “are consistent with the development density 3 Citations herein to the “Agenda Packet” are to the bates numbered pages of the Agenda Report for the April 21, 2026 City Council hearing on this Appeal. 4 Citations herein to the “CEQA Guidelines” are to Title 14, sections 15000 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations.
1126
City Council
April 21, 2026

Page 4 ends

established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified.” CEQA Guidelines § 15183(a).

The City does not, and cannot, make such a finding here. The General Plan EIR determined that development under the General Plan would not conflict with Coastal Act policies for biological resource protection because the City would implement the Coastal Act’s resource protection policies through a Coastal Land Use Plan (“Coastal LUP”), which was yet to be adopted. See General Plan DEIR at 5.3-34, -36. As a result, the General Plan EIR never actually studied how projects might conflict with the Coastal LUP.

The General Plan EIR thus deferred CEQA review of future projects’ impacts on ESHA. An EIR must discuss potential impacts to areas designated as ESHA under the Coastal Act. Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (2017) 2 Cal.5th 918, 941. Even development that is merely adjacent to ESHA triggers statutory mitigation obligations. Pub. Res. Code § 30240(b) (development “adjacent to [ESHA] shall be sited and designed to prevent impacts which would significantly degrade those areas”). ESHA-adjacent development thus must be carefully analyzed for impacts on ESHA.

The Project site here is clearly adjacent to an area identified in the General Plan EIR as ESHA, and may actually qualify as ESHA itself, as further discussed below and in Local 11’s earlier Appeal Letter. See AP 61-62; General Plan at p. 167, fig. C-2. The City cannot rely on the General Plan EIR’s finding of consistency with applicable land use policies that protect ESHA, because those policies did not exist when the General Plan was certified. As such, the City cannot rely on the General Plan EIR to restrict the scope of its CEQA review under Guidelines section 15183.

The City also makes no findings, and sets forth no evidence, that the Project is consistent with the development restrictions contained in General Plan Coastal Element Policies C-2.05 and C-2.10. Those policies directly require the City to protect ESHA according to the more specific dictates of its certified Coastal LUP, as further described in Section V below.

Instead, the City dismisses this issue with two conclusory statements, both of which are incorrect. First, it says that the General Plan EIR already determined that buildout in the area would not cause a significant impact by conflicting with Coastal Act policies. AP 237. But the EIR found no significant impact only “[u]pon implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval,” including the local coastal program. General Plan DEIR at 5.3-36 to -37. This finding leaves open the possibility that, as here, a future project could be inconsistent with those coastal policies 1127
City Council
April 21, 2026

Page 5 ends

and thereby cause a significant impact. Second, the City asserts that the Project site is “not located within the canyon ESHAs” so its ESHA policies do not apply. AP 244.

Setting aside that the Project site may well qualify as ESHA, this assertion does not account for the Coastal LUP’s limits on development in ESHA-adjacent areas.

These include clear density limits, such as maintaining a 100-foot development buffer around ESHA, and confining development adjacent to ESHA buffers to lowimpact land uses. See Coastal LUP at 4-42 to 4-43 (Policies RES-54, -57, -59, -60).

Where the City does discuss consistency with the Coastal LUP, it skips any analysis of ESHA-related development restrictions. AP 307-13.

Because the City does not discuss whether the Project is consistent with these General Plan policies, it cannot support its finding that the Project is consistent with the policies covered by the General Plan EIR, as is required for streamlined review under section 15183.

III. The City’s analysis of impacts to biological resources does not meet its obligations under CEQA Guidelines § 15183.

For the City to rely on the General Plan EIR it would need to undertake CEQA review of any previously unanalyzed or site-specific factors. The City’s record does not show any such review. The City entirely ignores the potential conflicts between the proposed Project and its Coastal Zone ESHA management policies. These policies, adopted after the General Plan EIR was certified, were “not analyzed as significant effects” in that EIR, and relate to “potentially significant off-site impacts” not discussed in that EIR. CEQA Guidelines § 15183(b)(2)-(3). They are plainly within the scope of the City’s CEQA review obligations under section 15183.

Nonetheless, the initial study goes out of its way to find that conflicts with resource-protection policies are less than significant.5 AP 238. To justify this finding, it simply says that the Project site is not in coastal canyon ESHA, and that adherence to existing City regulations would not conflict with the Coastal Zone. AP 244. As discussed in Section II, however, the City’s Coastal LUP contains several policies on ESHAadjacent development that conflict with the Project. These policies are incorporated into the City’s General Plan. The City is obligated to analyze these potential conflicts and identify mitigation for any impacts. Failing to do so violates CEQA’s disclosure obligations even under a streamlined analysis.
5 The City is actually inconsistent on whether it characterizes this potential impact as “less than significant,” see AP 238, or “no impact,” see AP 244-45. 1128
City Council
April 21, 2026

Page 6 ends

IV. In light of recent vegetation removal at the Project site, CEQA requires a new biological resources analysis.

The City also cannot approve the Project as proposed because it is not operating on current information. An agency’s decision not to update the environmental baseline in light of conditions that changed during the preparation of a CEQA document must be supported by substantial evidence. Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 296, 318-19.

Here, the vegetation removal described in the CNPS Letter has fundamentally shifted the environmental baseline with respect to biological resources. The letter describes removal of nearly all the vegetation in January 2026, including a native coastal sage scrub community. See CNPS Letter at 1; see also Attachment 2. However, the City continues to rely on a biological resource assessment whose field surveys concluded in December 2025. AP 456. That the site may now appear more disturbed because of this vegetation removal actually underscores the City’s need to update its analysis to rely on current, accurate baseline information. The coastal sage scrub community documented on the site has been disturbed before and could easily be growing back during construction.

Effects of these grow-back conditions on the frequency with which the special-status California gnatcatcher (which has previously been observed on the site), Crotch’s bumble bee, or other protected species may visit the site are unknown and unstudied. Because the vegetation has ecological continuity with the Sea Summit preserve, see CNPS Letter at 1, the recent vegetation removal may affect wildlife movement patterns in unanticipated ways and contribute to new offsite impacts.

Moreover, “removal” of “major vegetation” is “development” under the Coastal Act requiring a Coastal Development Permit (“CDP”). Pub. Res. Code § 30106. If a CDP was not obtained for this removal, the Coastal Commission may impose penalties for a violation of the act, including potentially requiring restoration of this habitat, which would further change the environmental setting. Id. § 30811. We will provide the Commission with a copy of this letter and a request that they investigate the matter.

In light of the change in conditions resulting from the vegetation removal and the serious possibility of a Coastal Commission restoration order that further changes natural conditions, the City lacks sufficient information to make informed CEQA findings. To approve the Project nonetheless would be an abuse of its discretion. 1129
City Council
April 21, 2026

Page 7 ends

V. The Project as proposed likely violates the Coastal Act and the City’s General Plan.

The Project is directly adjacent to Coastal Commission-designated ESHA.

Approving it as proposed would therefore likely conflict with several policies in the City’s General Plan Coastal Element and associated Coastal LUP.

These include:
• General Plan Policy NR-1.03, prohibiting grading and development in “sensitive habitats,” which per the City’s initial study includes the coastal sage scrub at the Project site (AP 236, 239), “unless no feasible project alternative exists which reduces environmental impacts to less than significant levels, or it is replaced with habitat of equivalent value, as acceptable to the City Council” • General Plan Policy C-2.05, “restricting the encroachment of development, incompatible land uses and sensitive habitat disturbance into designated coastal canyons and coastal bluff areas, consistent with the Local Coastal Program” • General Plan Policy C-2.10, “restricting development in ESHAs consistent with the Local Coastal Program and the California Coastal Act.” The Coastal LUP in turn imposes restrictions on ESHA-adjacent development including buffer zones and intensity limits. For example:
• LUP Policy RES-54, stating that a “100-foot buffer, shall be provided around all ESHA” or “the largest feasible buffer” where there is existing development • LUP Policy RES-57, requiring “ESHA buffers [to] be maintained exclusively with native vegetation to serve as transitional habitat”
• LUP Policy RES-59, requiring “[w]here feasible, [to] confine development adjacent to ESHAs to low impact land uses, such as open space and passive recreation”
• LUP Policy RES-62, requiring “mitigation in the form of habitat creation or substantial restoration for allowable impacts to ESHA and other sensitive resources that cannot be avoided through the implementation of siting and design alternatives”
• LUP Policy RES-65, requiring open space dedication in “conjunction with new development” that “preserve[s] ESHA, buffers, and all mitigation areas” 1130
City Council
April 21, 2026

Page 8 ends

Approval of the Project as proposed violates the City’s obligation that development be consistent with General Plan policies. Orange Citizens for Parks & Recreation v. Superior Court (2016) 2 Cal.5th 141, 153 (“The propriety of virtually any local decision affecting land use and development depends upon consistency with the applicable general plan and its elements.”). The Entitlements cannot be legally approved.

Furthermore, as the Appeal Letter notes, the Project as proposed appears inconsistent with the Coastal Act’s and the General Plan’s policies on lower-cost overnight accommodations (“LCOAs”) because it lacks enforceable conditions of approval to ensure that these policies are implemented. AP 65-69. The City rejoins that it “defers to the Coastal Commission’s established authority and evolving standards to ensure compliance with Coastal Act requirements.” AP 6. The City cannot dodge its responsibility like this. The City’s own General Plan requires that it “where feasible, provide low cost overnight accommodations.” General Policy C-1.14. The applicant’s own Project proposal shows that LCOAs are feasible. Unless the City ensures that these accommodations are provided, the approval will be inconsistent with the General Plan and thus invalid. The Coastal Commission is likely to agree. The City should impose a condition of approval mandating the LCOAs now and spare the taxpayers the expense of further considering a project that may need to be substantially modified.

Likewise, denying the permits would be the more prudent course of action in light of the fact that the Coastal Commission may well designate the Project site as ESHA. See Douda v. California Coastal Commission (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 1181, 1194 (Coastal Commission can designate areas as ESHA when it is the CDP-issuing agency). ESHA is “any area in which plant or animal life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and which could be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities and developments.” Pub. Res. Code § 30107.5.

As the City’s own biological resources assessment notes, the federally threatened California gnatcatcher has been observed on the Project site over multiple field visits during 2025. AP 461; see also Coastal LUP at 4-7 (noting that the Coastal Commission designated “all areas that were used by the . . . coastal California gnatcatcher” as ESHA within the Marblehead/Sea Summit area); id. at 4-13 (“Any Coastal Sage Scrub occupied by the Coastal California gnatcatcher or other rare species will qualify as ESHA because of the especially valuable role it plays in the ecosystem.”). Field visits also noted an already-disturbed Menzies’s golden bush scrub community (designated as sensitive by the state), stating that “mitigation for its loss may be necessary.” AP 459. And the Project site is adjacent to a designated ESHA area that the Coastal Commission specifically made a reserve for the sensitive Blochman’s dudleya. AP 64.

The observed presence of rare and sensitive species on and near the site, clear threat of disturbance or degradation, and its adjacency to protected ESHA make the site a 1131
City Council
April 21, 2026

Page 9 ends

strong candidate to be designated as ESHA. This would make the Project impossible as proposed, because only land uses “dependent” on protected “habitat values” may be allowed within designated ESHA. Pub. Res. Code § 30240(a). As such, the City should not approve the Entitlements until it has the information to be more certain that the Coastal Commission will not designate the Project site as ESHA.

VI. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, Local 11 respectfully requests that the City grant the Appeal and withhold approving the Entitlements for the Project until, at minimum:
• The applicant prepares a full EIR consistent with CEQA, which robustly analyzes potential impacts to biological resources, including due to conflict with applicable General Plan and Coastal LUP policies on ESHA-adjacent development, and which is reflective of the current state of the Project site after the January 2026 vegetation removal;
• The applicant modifies the Project to be consistent with applicable Coastal LUP policies for ESHA-adjacent areas and includes information demonstrating to the City’s satisfaction that the Project site is not eligible to be designated as ESHA; • The City conditions any approval of the Entitlements on an enforceable commitment to uphold Coastal Act and General Plan LCOA policies as discussed in the Appeal Letter, and;
• The applicant demonstrates that the Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan, including its Coastal Element policies on natural resources protection.

Without these changes, the Project cannot be legally approved.

Very truly yours,

SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP
Gabriel M.B. Ross
1132
City Council
April 21, 2026

Page 10 ends

Cc: Rick Loeffler, Mayor
Steve Knoblock, Mayor Pro Tem
Victor Cabral, Council Member
Mark Enmeier, Council Member
Zhen Wu, Council Member
Andrew Willis, Southern CA Enforcement Manager, California Coastal Commission (by email and U.S. mail)
Attachments:

Attachment 1 – Letter from Orange County Chapter, California Native Plant Society to San Clemente City Council (April 15, 2026)
Attachment 2 – Photos depicting vegetation removal
1133
Attachment 1
1134
To conserve California native plants and their natural habitats, today and into the future, through science, education, stewardship, gardening, and advocacy OCCNPS.org | P.O. Box 54891, Irvine, CA 92619-4891
San Clemente City Council
[email protected]
[email protected]
15 April 2026
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
On behalf of the Orange County Chapter of the California Native Plant Society (OCCNPS), we submit the following comments regarding the proposed Hansen Hotel project at 401 El Camino Real, scheduled for public hearing on April 21, 2026.

OCCNPS previously submitted a detailed comment letter to the City on August 26, 2025, documenting the presence of a disturbed but functioning coastal sage scrub plant community on the project site. That assessment was based on a field visit and botanical survey conducted by qualified biologists and included a species inventory demonstrating that native coastal sage scrub species dominated the site, despite some disturbance. These findings directly contradicted the conclusion in the City’s staff report that the site lacked sensitive biological resources and supported the project’s claimed exemption from environmental review. A copy of our August 26, 2025 comment is attached.

We reiterate our fundamental concern that the site, due to its vegetation, ecological function, and direct adjacency to the extensive Sea Summit open space preserve, may qualify as Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) under the California Coastal Act. The assertion that the site is “substantially surrounded by urban uses” is not supported by the actual landscape context, in which a significant portion of the site borders conserved natural habitat with ecological continuity.

Since submission of our August 2025 letter, a significant and troubling development has occurred. In January 2026, OCCNPS was notified that all vegetation on the site had been removed. A subsequent site visit confirmed that the property had been completely cleared to bare soil, eliminating all previously documented native plant cover, including coastal sage scrub vegetation.

This action raises serious concerns. Vegetation removal and site clearing constitute “development” under the California Coastal Act and may require a Coastal Development Permit (CDP), particularly where sensitive habitat resources are present or may be present. At this time, we have been unable to identify any approved CDP, waiver, or other coastal authorization for this activity through publicly available records, including the California Coastal Commission’s permitting portal. Furthermore, City records indicate that the project’s discretionary permits remain pending.

The removal of vegetation under these circumstances appears to have occurred prior to completion of environmental review and may have altered or eliminated biological resources that are central to determining the project’s impacts. This raises substantial concerns regarding compliance with both the California Coastal Act and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and whether the environmental baseline for the project has been improperly modified.

Importantly, the absence of vegetation today does not negate the documented presence of coastal sage scrub habitat prior to clearing. Our biologist records and photography confirm this vegetation and a disturbed coastal 1135
To conserve California native plants and their natural habitats, and increase understanding, appreciation, and horticultural use of native plants.

OCCNPS.org | P.O. Box 54891, Irvine, CA 92619-4891
sage scrub plant community. Sound environmental review must rely on accurate baseline conditions, not conditions resulting from recent disturbance.

Given these concerns, OCCNPS respectfully requests that the City of San Clemente take the following actions:

1. Deny approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Development Permit for the Hansen Hotel project unless and until full compliance with CEQA and the California Coastal Act is demonstrated;

2. Require preparation of a comprehensive biological assessment based on pre-disturbance conditions, including consideration of the site’s prior coastal sage scrub community and its potential qualification as ESHA;

3. Coordinate with the California Coastal Commission to determine whether unauthorized development, including vegetation removal, has occurred and to ensure appropriate regulatory oversight;

4. Require restoration of the site to its prior coastal sage scrub habitat, or to a condition of equal or greater ecological function, using locally native species appropriate to the region and consistent with adjacent conserved lands;

5. Ensure that any future project design, landscaping, and mitigation measures avoid the use of invasive or non-local plant species and instead support the long-term ecological integrity of the surrounding natural habitat.

The protection of coastal sage scrub habitat and its associated species is a matter of regional and statewide importance. The sequence of events at this site—particularly the removal of native vegetation during an active entitlement process—warrants careful scrutiny and a cautious approach.

We appreciate your consideration of these comments and respectfully urge the City to base its decision on sound science, accurate environmental baselines, and full compliance with applicable environmental laws. cc: CA Coastal Commission
Sincerely,
Ron Vanderhoff Elizabeth Wallace Laura Camp
Director and Plant Science Chair Co-President Co-President CNPS, Orange County Chapter
PO Box 54891, Irvine, CA 92619-4891
OCCNPS.org
[email protected]
1136
Attachment 2
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 21, 2026
HANSON HOTEL - MP22-324

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Attachment 6
1143

IN SUPPORT
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153

OPPOSED
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175

OPPOSED
Same Comments
Grouped by Subject
with list of Signees
Please note comments submitted
more than once.
1176

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: Grant the Appeal and Ensure Commonsense VMT/Traffic Mitigations in the Hanson Hotel Project
Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
I urge you to grant the appeal and appropriately study the impact on traffic and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) that will be caused by the Hanson Hotel Project. The project relies on a 1998 traffic study done using a significantly different (“level of service”) type of analysis as part of a different project that involved 27 timeshares and 10,000 square feet of retail space. The proposal argues that this new 61 room hotel and rooftop bar project is less intensive than the old proposal.

I do not agree. The old traffic analysis is based on a different type of analysis (“level of service”) rather than vehicle miles traveled. The Planning Commission staff report on the hotel project said that it would generate 1,631 daily trips, compared to the 620 daily trips generated by the old timeshare project.

Additionally, the 27 timeshare units in the 1998 project are less than half the number of hotel rooms proposed here. Timeshares usually involve longer stays as compared to hotels, suggesting that this new hotel project might create more frequent trips and more impacts.

The project does not attempt enough simple and straightforward mitigations that would reduce vehicle trips.

Please grant the appeal and ensure an appropriate VMT study is conducted.

Signed by:

1. Shirley Xiao 12/28/25

2. Noriko Mukae 12/25/25

3. Narendrakumar Bhakta 12/12/25

4. Tim Murphy 12/11/25

5. Lenna McClennen 12/11/25*

6. Kathleen Armenteros 12/11/25*

7. Mike Frost 12/10/25

8. George Dutra 12/10/25

9. Anthony Evans 12/9/25

10. Gina Moritz 12/9/25

11. Heather Carrick 12/9/25

12. Scott Henderson 12/9/25

13. Nimisha Bhakta 12/9/25

14. MM Babbitt 12/9/25

15. Krista Humphrey 12/9/25
1177

16. Stacey Finnerty 12/9/25

17. Nancy Wheeler 12/9/25

18. Stephany Rivera 12/9/25

19. Karen Carlsen 12/9/25

20. Stop Stop

21. Laurel Jiron 12/9/215

22. Sara Kennedy 12/9/25

23. Scot Jones 12/9/25

24. Sierra Corbridge 12/9/25

25. Ken Kaefer 12/9/25

26. June Steffey 12/9/25

27. Samuel Tuscano 12/9/25

28. Nichole Palo 12/9/25

29. Suzanne Wagner 12/9/25

30. Alica Cali 12/9/25
*Signed Two Emails
1178

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: Grant the Appeal and Ensure Commonsense VMT/Traffic Mitigations in this Project Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
This is an horrible idea that will ruin our community entirely! I urge you to grant the appeal and appropriately study the impact on traffic and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) that will be caused by project. The project relies on a 1998 traffic study done using a significantly different (“level of service”) type of analysis as part of a different project that involved 27 timeshares and 10,000 square feet of retail space. The proposal argues that this new 61 room hotel and rooftop bar project is less intensive than the old proposal.

The project does not attempt enough simple and straightforward mitigations that would reduce vehicle trips.

Please grant the appeal and ensure an appropriate VMT study is conducted.

Signed by:

1. Swetlana Schmidt 12/9/25

2. Chace Paddack 12/9/25

3. Ellen Chambell 12/9/25

4. Melanie Osorio 12/9/25

5. Tony Roxstrom 12/9/25

6. Michelle Moon 12/9/25

7. Brittany Orahood 12/8/25

8. Susana Lobos 12/8/25

9. Scott Wigglesworth 12/8/25

10. Chase Worden 12/8/25

11. Emiley Gregory 12/8/25

12. Daniela Lutz 12/8/25
1179

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: No more rooftop bars in this neighborhood
Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
ANOTHER hotel project at the Outlets Mall project was just approved about a half mile away. Do you think we need more hotels in this neighborhood? What are the cumulative noise impacts of multiple rooftop bars?
I do not support a rooftop bar at this location. Please grant the appeal.

Signed By:

1. James Barlow 12/8/25

2. J. Coleman 12/8/25

3. Kim Carr 12/8/25

4. Ramiro Aguirre 12/8/25

5. Kasey Hume 12/8/25

6. Jeffrey Wiant

7. Fatemeh KIarami 12/8/25

8. Roberto Herrera 12/8/25

9. Hannah McClain 12/8/25

10. Susan Curry 12/8/25
1180

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: No more rooftop bars in this neighborhood, please grant appeal of Hanson Hotel project Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
ANOTHER hotel project at the Outlets Mall project was just approved about a half mile away. Do you think we need more hotels in this neighborhood? What are the cumulative noise impacts of multiple rooftop bars?
I do not support a rooftop bar at this location. Please grant the appeal.

Signed by:

1. Beatrice Yuan 1/11/26

2. Julie Siff 12/12/25

3. Dana Duarte 12/10/25

4. Keith Shane 12/10/25

5. Martha Huskey 12/10/25

6. Michelle Lincoln 12/10/25

7. Maria Murillo 12/10/25

8. George Sutherland 12/10/25

9. Thuy Lee 12/10/25

10. Dale Philippi 12/10/25

11. Nancy Hartnett 12/9/25

12. Jenne Robitaille 12/9/25

13. Gwen Kennedy 12/9/25

14. Richard Peach 12/9/25

15. Terry Lawrence 12/9/25**

16. Ashley Bracamonte 12/9/25

17. Darlene Croft 12/9/25

18. Meka Diggs 12/9/25

19. James Rooke 12/9/25

20. Heaven Leiva 12/9/25

21. Justine Micklin 12/9/25

22. Rose Delloye 12/9/25

23. Brandon Marano 12/9/25

24. Andrew Krieger 12/9/25

25. Kasey Coppola 12/9/25
**Signed Three Emails
1181

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: Protect the California Gnatcatcher, Support the appeal Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
Please support the appeal of the Hanson Hotel. Gnatcatchers can be found at the trails at the nearby Sea Summit and Pico Park at the bluff just above the site. The site becomes quiet in the evening without the hotel, which could be of great benefit to the wildlife there.

I do not support a rooftop bar at this location. Please grant the appeal.

Signed by:

1. ALAN HORNALL 12/9/25

2. Anne Thiele 12/9/25

3. Carol Luetz 12/9/25

4. Ann Tomlinson 12/9/25

5. Stephanie Curry 12/8/25

6. Jake Stahlman 12/8/25
1182

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: Protect the California Gnatcatcher, Support the appeal of the Hanson Hotel Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
Please support the appeal of the Hanson Hotel. Gnatcatchers can be found at the trails at the nearby Sea Summit and Pico Park at the bluff just above the site. The site becomes quiet in the evening without the hotel, which could be of great benefit to the wildlife there.

I do not support a rooftop bar at this location. Please grant the appeal.

Signed by:

1. Donna D’Ottavio 1/19/26

2. Hana Liu 12/25/26

3. Turi Daniels 12/19/25

4. Tracey Canziani 12/18/25

5. Terry Lawrence 12/16/25 & 12/14/25

6. Cyndi Larson 12/13/25

7. Marge Donohue 12/13/25

8. Ramona Daly 12/12/25

9. Jerome Pajor 12/10/25

10. Reina Myers 12/10/25

11. Kathleen Armenteros 12/10/25*

12. Sarah Nowels 12/9/25

13. Pauline Faye 12/9/25

14. Lilly Dunbar 12/9/25

15. Allison Waite 12/9/25

16. Esen Koen 12/9/25

17. Dan Giese 12/9/25

18. Jeff Carrete 12/9/25

19. Jennifer Johnson 12/9/25

20. Teri Jones Castro 12/9/25

21. Theodore Sanders 12/9/25

22. Janice Rabel 12/9/25

23. Teresa Zoerner 12/9/25

24. Sheryl Martinez 12/9/25

25. Jack McIver 12/9/25

26. Phyllis Tracy
*Signed Two Different Emails
1183
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org

AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

Submitted By: Finance and Administrative Services
Prepared By: Cara Morin, Human Resources Manager
Brian Brower, Assistant City Manager
Subject:
..titl e

STATUS REPORT ON CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE POSITION VACANCIES AND

RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION EFFORTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 2561/GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 3502.3 ..body
Summary:

Assembly Bill 2561, enacted in 2022 and effective January 1, 2025, amended Government Code Section 3502.3 to require local public agencies to annually present workforce vacancy, recruitment, and retention data to their governing boards prior to budget adoption. The purpose of this legislation is to promote transparency, strengthen workforce planning, and ensure public agencies evaluate staffing challenges that may affect service delivery.

In compliance with these requirements, the City of San Clemente has prepared this report to provide City Council, employees, bargaining groups, and the public with a comprehensive update regarding the City’s current vacancy status, workforce trends, and ongoing recruitment and retention strategies.

Key highlights include:
 Citywide vacancy overview and vacancy factor analysis.  Recruitment and retention initiatives undertaken during Fiscal Year 2025-2026.  Classification and compensation improvements.
 Departmental and bargaining unit vacancy trends.
 Strategic workforce planning goals for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

While the City’s current vacancy rates remain below statutory thresholds requiring expanded reporting, workforce data continues to provide valuable insight into organizational capacity, recruitment competitiveness, organizational restructuring opportunities, and long-term workforce sustainability. This report reflects the City’s commitment to maintaining high-quality public services through responsible workforce planning, strategic modernization, and transparent governance.

Background:

Government Code Section 3502.3 imposes three primary requirements on public agencies:
1184
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2

1. At least once each fiscal year, prior to budget adoption, the governing board must hold a public hearing to receive an update on position vacancies and recruitment and retention efforts.

2. During the hearing, the public agency must identify any necessary changes to policies, procedures, or recruitment activities that may contribute to hiring obstacles.

3. The recognized employee organization for a bargaining unit must be permitted to make a presentation during the public hearing. If vacancies within a single bargaining unit meet or exceed 20% of authorized full-time positions, additional vacancy and recruitment data may be requested.

The City adopted a biennial budget in June 2024 for Fiscal Years 2024-2025 and 2025-2026.

Accordingly, this report serves as the City’s annual workforce status update prior to development of the upcoming Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and 2027-2028 Biennial Budget.

Discussion:

Citywide Vacancy Overview
As of May 1, 2026:
 27 of the City’s 202 authorized positions were vacant (13.37% vacancy rate).  21 of the 27 vacant positions were within the San Clemente City Employees Association (SCCEA) Bargaining Unit.
 The vacancy rate within SCCEA-represented positions was 12.96%, which remains below the 20% statutory threshold for expanded reporting.

The City’s vacancy factor is a workforce planning metric used to assess the proportion of authorized full-time budgeted positions that remain unfilled during a designated reporting period.

For purposes of this report, the vacancy factor was calculated by dividing the total number of vacant full-time positions by the total number of authorized full-time positions as of May 1, 2026, and multiplying that figure by 100. This methodology provides the City with a consistent and transparent benchmark for evaluating staffing levels, workforce stability, organizational capacity, and recruitment effectiveness over time.

A moderate vacancy factor is common in public agencies and may reflect normal workforce mobility, including turnover, promotions, retirements, organizational restructuring, or recruitment timelines. However, sustained or concentrated vacancies—particularly in operationally critical or technically specialized areas—may indicate broader workforce challenges such as market competitiveness, succession vulnerabilities, or classification misalignment requiring strategic evaluation.

To support transparency and provide additional context beyond the Citywide vacancy rate, supporting attachments are included to provide both position-specific vacancy detail and broader organizational workforce analysis.
1185
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 3
Attachment 3 provides a detailed list of all vacant positions as of May 1, 2026, organized by department and classification. This information offers information regarding which vacancies currently exist across the organization.

Attachment 4 provides a broader workforce analysis by bargaining unit classification category, department, and division, offering additional insight into vacancy concentrations, operational trends, and workforce pressures. While not specifically required under Assembly Bill 2561, this expanded analysis supports strategic workforce planning by helping identify areas where recruitment complexity, classification structure, succession vulnerabilities, or market competitiveness may require additional evaluation.

Departmental Trends and Organizational Impact
Current vacancy trends within Public Works, Community Development, and other operationally specialized areas do not solely reflect turnover; rather, they also represent organizational restructuring, succession planning efforts, and the increasing technical specialization required for certain classifications. Positions requiring niche certifications, technical expertise, or specialized operational knowledge often experience longer recruitment timelines due to competitive labor markets and evolving workforce demands.

These workforce trends provide important strategic insight for City Council by identifying where vacancies may indicate broader organizational challenges, including market competitiveness, classification structure limitations, or operational inefficiencies. Staff will continue to monitor vacancy patterns proactively to identify stagnant or difficult-to-fill positions and evaluate whether classification modernization, compensation adjustments, or organizational realignment may be necessary to ensure continuity of high-quality public services consistent with community expectations.

For example, recruitment challenges within Public Works related to Utilities Mechanic (now Maintenance Mechanic) and Electrical Instrumentation Technician classifications revealed belowmarket compensation and succession vulnerabilities. In response, the City completed a Classification and Compensation Study, modernized these classifications, created trainee-level opportunities for future workforce development and succession planning, and implemented salary schedule adjustments effective March 4, 2026. These proactive changes are intended to improve competitiveness, strengthen succession planning, and support successful recruitment outcomes.

Recruitment and Retention Efforts
Over the past fiscal year, the City has continued prioritizing strategic recruitment and retention initiatives to attract and retain qualified employees while supporting operational excellence.

Key initiatives include:
 Completion and implementation of targeted classification and compensation studies to address market competitiveness.
 Strategic classification restructuring and creation of promotional pathways. 1186
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 4
 Salary adjustments where market deficiencies were identified.  Enhanced departmental workforce planning tied to long-term operational needs.  Continued collaboration between Human Resources and hiring managers to improve recruitment timelines and hiring outcomes.

These efforts reflect the City Council’s priority to maintain a qualified, sustainable workforce capable of delivering essential public services.

Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Strategic Goals
Human Resources will continue advancing several strategic initiatives to strengthen the City’s workforce, including:
 Modernization of the onboarding process to improve the applicant and new employee experience.
 Enhancement of recruitment marketing, job posting strategies, and candidate engagement efforts.
 Implementation of NEOGOV’s Attract module to support proactive talent sourcing.  Development of a structured five-year Classification and Compensation review cycle to maintain market competitiveness and organizational relevance.  Expansion of career pathing and succession planning efforts to preserve institutional knowledge and prepare for anticipated retirement trends.  Continued development and implementation of workforce training initiatives, including Leadership Connect and Supervisory Foundations, designed to strengthen leadership effectiveness, equip supervisors and managers with practical tools and resources, enhance employee engagement, foster positive workplace cultures, and support long-term retention through stronger organizational leadership capacity.

These initiatives are intended to strengthen workforce agility, improve leadership competency, reduce long-term vacancy challenges, enhance employee experience, and ensure the City remains well-positioned to attract, develop, and retain a high-performing workforce capable of meeting evolving operational demands.

Notice and Employee Organization Compliance:

Consistent with Government Code Section 3502.3, the City provided required notice to SCCEA regarding vacancy rates within its bargaining unit. SCCEA was informed that the vacancy rate remained below the statutory threshold requiring expanded reporting. Notice of the Public Hearing has been or will be duly published in accordance with legal requirements. 1187
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 5
Council Options:
 Receive and file the administrative report dated May 19, 2026 and on file with the City Clerk.  Provide additional direction to staff.

Environmental Review/Analysis:

The proposed action is not a project subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Fiscal Impact:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this status update.

Recommended Action(s):
..recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Open the Public Hearing regarding the Status Report on City of San Clemente Position Vacancies and Recruitment and Retention Efforts in Compliance with Assembly Bill 2561 / Government Code Section 3502.3, hear and consider public testimony and comments, close the public hearing; and

2. Receive and file the Administrative Report dated May 19, 2026, as an information item. ..endAttachment:

1. Notice of Public Hearing

2. Notice of Public Hearing to SCCEA

3. List of Vacant Positions as of May 1, 2026

4. Vacancy Analysis by Bargaining Unit, Department, and Division Notification:

Public hearing notices were published in the San Clemente Times on May 7 and May 14, 2026. 1188
Attachment 1
Published: Thursday, May 7 and May 14, 2026

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A

PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA
RELATIVE TO THE FOLLOWING:

Status Report on City of San Clemente Position Vacancies and Recruitment and Retention Efforts in Compliance with Assembly Bill 2561/Government Code Section 3502.3
Public Hearing as required by Government Code § 3502.3 to provide a status of vacancies and recruitment and retention efforts to the City Council. Additionally, the City must identify any changes to policies, procedures or recruitment activities that impact the City’s efforts to reduce its vacancies. The recognized employee organization’s bargaining unit shall be entitled to make a presentation at the public hearing.

If you challenge this action in court you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of San Clemente at, or prior to, the public hearing.

To allow staff adequate time to confirm software compatibility, individuals wishing to utilize electronic visual aids to supplement their oral presentations at the meeting, must submit the electronic files to the City Clerk by no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Only compatible electronic formats will be permitted to be used on City audio/visual computer equipment. Staff makes no guarantee that such material will be compatible, but will use its best efforts to accommodate the request.

Notice is further given that said public hearing will be conducted by the City Council on Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. at the San Clemente City Council Chambers, located at 910 Calle Negocio, 2nd Floor, San Clemente, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing or provide written communication to the City Council to express their opinions and/or present evidence relative to this matter.

For further information related to the matter, please contact Human Resources at [email protected] or 949-361-8203.

Laura Campagnolo
City Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Council
1189
1 Morin, Cara
From: Morin, Cara
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2026 9:33 PM
To: Swartz, Carrie
Cc: Staudenbaur, Sean; '[email protected]'; Brower, Brian; LeVell, Lisa Subject: Notice of Public Hearing: Update
Attachments: Vacancy Attachments Final.pdf
Carrie,
Assembly Bill 2561 (AB 2561) is a law that mandates public agencies conduct a public hearing each fiscal year to present information on the status of their job vacancies, recruitment, and retention efforts. Consistent with the law and requirements of Government Code Section 3502.3, the City of San Clemente will be conducting a public hearing at the May 19, 2026 City Council meeting to receive comments on the status report regarding vacancies and recruitment and retention efforts.

As a recognized employee organization representing a bargaining unity, the San Clemente City Employees Association (SCCEA) may make a presentation at the public hearing.

Per Government Code Section 3502.3, if the number of vacancies with the SCCEA bargaining unit meets or exceeds 20% of the total number of authorized fulltime positions, SCCEA has the right to request in writing that the City present any or all of the following information:

1. The total number of job vacancies within the bargaining unit;

2. The total number of applicants for vacant positions within the bargaining unit;

3. The average number of days to complete the hiring process from when a position is posted; And

4. Opportunities to improve compensation and other working conditions.

According to the table below (and attached), as of April 21, 2026, the vacancy rate does not exceed or meet the 20% threshold described above.

Attachment 2
1190
2 If you would like to make a presentation at the public hearing or have any questions, please let me know.

Attached, you’ll find the final updated documents for the public hearing- including the Notice of Public Hearing, List of Current Vacancies as of May 1, 2026, and Vacancy Analysis by Workforce Category/Representation, Department and Division.

Cara Morin
Human Resources Manager
City of San Clemente
910 Calle Negocio | San Clemente, CA | 92673
Phone (949) 361-8203
Cell (949) 610-9731
[email protected]
1191
City of San Clemente
As of May 1, 2026
27 Vacancies

LIST OF VACANT POSITIONS
mente

OSITIONS
Attachment 3
1192
A. Workforce Category Vacancy Analysis
Represented categories are identified where applicable; non-represented categories are included to provide a comprehensive Citywide workforce analysis
B. Departmental Vacancy Analysis
Departmental categories are provided to support a comprehensive Citywide operational workforce analysis and to identify vacancy trends, service pressures, and organizational considerations across functional areas.

A. Workforce Category Vacancy Analysis gy y y
Represented categories are identified where applicable; non-represented categories are included to provide a comprehensive Citywide workforce analysis
B. Departmental Vacancy Analysis py y
Departmental categories are provided to support a comprehensive Citywide operational workforce analysis and to identify vacancy trends, service pressures, and organizational considerations across functional areas.

VACANCY ANALYSIS BY WORKFORCE CATEGORY ACANCY ANALYSIS BY WORKFORCE CATEGORY,

DEPARTMENT & DIVISIO DEPARTMENT & DIVISION
Attachment 4
1193
C. Department-Division Vacancy Analysis
Departmental and divisional categories are included to provide a comprehensive Citywide operational workforce analysis and support strategic evaluation of vacancy trends across service areas. This analysis is intended to assist in identifying areas where recruitment complexity, succession vulnerabilities, restructuring opportunities, or service delivery pressures may warrant further review.
1194
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org

AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 9A.

Submitted By: City Clerk
Prepared By: Laura Campagnolo, City Clerk
Subject:
..titl e
INTRODUC ..body TION (FIRST READING) OF AN ORDINANCE RELATED TO MAYOR TERM LIMITS Summary:

In November 2020, a measure was placed on the ballot allowing the electorate to vote on whether or not City Councilmembers would be subject to term limits. A majority of voters favored City Council term limits, and the City Council is now limited to serving two consecutive four-year terms, with the ability to again serve as a member of the City Council after being off the City Council for at least two years. See Ordinance No. 1691 (Attachment 2).

In conjunction with the General Municipal Election in November 2024, the transition to electing Councilmembers by geographic districts (3 and 4) was initiated. In November 2026, Councilmembers will be elected from Districts 1 and 2 as well as the election of a Mayor selected at-large and the transition to the by-district elections will be complete.

Discussion:

Following discussions and deliberations on the transition from at-large to by-district elections, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1762 (Attachment 3) and added Section 2.04.100 to the Municipal Code to address Mayoral term limits. Section 2.04.100 provides, in part, that the Mayor shall be elected at-large by the people of San Clemente and shall serve a term of two years with a life-time term limit of three full terms, without the ability to run for Mayor again after completing three full terms. As indicated at the April 21 and May 5, 2026 City Council meetings, pursuant to Government Code section 36502(b), term limits are not operative until submitted to the electors at a regularly scheduled election and a majority of the votes cast on the question favor the adoption of the limits.

At the City Council meeting of May 5, 2026, the City Council adopted a policy related to the role of the Mayor and selection of Mayor Pro Tem. As discussed and confirmed by the City Council, the Mayor is a member of the City Council with some minor additional responsibilities. The Mayor has no legislative authority or administrative functions beyond those extended to members of the City Council, but serves as the Chair of the City Council meetings and is the Ceremonial Leader of the City.

Additionally, the City Council directed staff to return with an Ordinance for consideration that addresses term limits for the elected Mayor to be consistent with the previous voter-approved term limits for City Councilmembers. If adopted by the City Council, proposed Ordinance No. 1809 would amend Section 2.04.100 of the Municipal Code to indicate that:
1195
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 9A.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2
(1) The Mayor is a City Councilmember;
(2) Like all City Councilmembers, the Mayor shall serve no more than a total of eight consecutive years before taking at least two years off before serving again; (3) Just like partial City Councilmember terms, partial Mayoral terms do not count toward the eight consecutive year total; and
(4) A person who has previously served a four-year term as a Councilmember, shall serve no more than two consecutive two-year terms as Mayor.

Considerations Identified by Staff:

Establishment of term limits for Mayor and City Councilmembers encourages new candidates to run for office, bringing fresh ideas and perspectives into local government.

Council Options:
 Introduce and conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 1809.  Revise, introduce and conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 1809.  Take no action.

Environmental Review/Analysis:

This is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Fiscal Impact:

Adoption of the ordinance to apply City Council term limits to the elected Mayor would have no fiscal impact.

Recommended Action(s):
..recommendation
Introduce and conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 1809 entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SAN CLEMENTE MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.04.100 RELATED TO MAYOR TERM LIMITS AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1782 IN PART.
..end
Attachment:

1. Ordinance No. 1809

2. Ordinance No. 1691 - Text of Measure BB (City Council Term Limits – November 2020)

3. Ordinance No. 1762
Notification:

None.
1196
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. 1809

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA,

AMENDING SAN CLEMENTE MUNICIPAL
CODE SECTION 2.04.100 RELATED TO

MAYOR TERM LIMITS AND REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. 1782 IN PART
WHEREAS, in November 2020, Measure BB (Ordinance No. 1691) was placed on the ballot and approved by the voters thereby establishing City Council term limits of two consecutive four-year terms, for a total of eight consecutive years, with the ability to again serve as a member of the City Council after being off the City Council for at least two years; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente transitioned to by-district elections in November 2024 through the adoption of Ordinance No. 1782; and WHEREAS, in November 2024, the electorate of San Clemente elected Council Members in District 3 and District 4;
WHEREAS, in November 2026, the electorate of San Clemente will elect Council Members in District 1, District 2 and vote for a Mayor at-large; WHEREAS, the Mayor is a City Council Member; and
WHEREAS, in November 2026, with the election of a Mayor at-large, the Mayor will serve a two-year term; and
WHEREAS, in approving Ordinance No. 1691, the voters expressed a clear intention that no City Councilmember shall serve for more than eight consecutive years; and
WHEREAS, in November 2026, with the election of a Mayor at-large, the City Council desires to clarify that the Mayor’s term shall be consistent with the term limit established by the voters for all members of the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Clemente, California, hereby ordains as follows:

SECTION 1: Section 2.04.100 of the Municipal Code of the City of San Clemente shall be modified to read as follows (strike throughs are deletions and underlines are additions):
1197
Ordinance No. 1809 Page 2
A. Pursuant to California Government Code sections 34886 and 34871(c), commencing with the November 2024 general municipal election, the members of the San Clemente City Council shall be elected by-districts in four (4) single-member districts with an elective at-large Mayor.

B. Each Councilmember in Districts 1, 2, 3 and 4 shall serve a term of four years subject to the term limit set forth in section 2.04.090.

C. The Mayor shall be elected at large by the people of San Clemente and shall serve a term of two years. , with a life-time term limit of three full terms, and without the ability to run for Mayor again after completing three full terms.

D. As a member of the City Council, the Mayor shall also be subject to the term limit set forth in section 2.04.090, which is to be read as consistently as possible given the elected Mayor’s two-year term. For example, even as Mayor, no person shall be eligible to serve in any office of a City Councilmember for more than eight consecutive years.

Just like partial City Councilmember terms, partial Mayoral terms (less than two years), shall not count toward the eight consecutive years limit.

Because of the eight consecutive year limit, any person who has previously served a four-year term as a Councilmember, shall serve no more than two consecutive two-year terms as Mayor immediately thereafter. After eight consecutive years in service, as with other members of the City Council, the Mayor shall not again be eligible for election or appointment as any member of the City Council unless and until not less than two years has or will have elapsed between the most recent date of such person's prior service as a member of the City Council (including as Mayor) and the effective date of such person's most recent election or appointment to such office.

SECTION 2: Ordinance No. 1782 is hereby repealed in part only to the extent that it is inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance and shall otherwise remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 3: If any part of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of the ordinance. The City declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each part of it, irrespective of the possibility that some part or parts of it might be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and cause the same to be published as required by law, and the same shall take effect as provided by law.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _____day of _________________, 2026. 1198
Ordinance No. 1809 Page 3
ATTEST:
_______________________________ ___________________________ City Clerk of the City of Rick Loeffler, Mayor of the City of San Clemente, California San Clemente, California

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, Laura Campagnolo, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1809 having been regularly introduced at the meeting of _______________________, was again introduced, the reading in full thereof unanimously waived, and duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _____day of _____________, _______, and said ordinance was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this _____ day of ______________________, ________.
__________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
1199
Attachment 2
1200
1201
1202
Attachment 3
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org

AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 10A.

Submitted By: Public Works
Prepared By: Belgin Cuhadaroglu, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer ..end Amir K. Ilkhanipour, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Subject:
..titl e
BID PROTEST HEARING FOR THE REEVES BOOSTER PUMP STATION, CIP PROJECT NO. 17405, AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACT FOR THE PROJECT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE AND RESPONSIBLE

BIDDER, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT, AND FINDING

THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ..body ACT
Summary:

In accordance with the City of San Clemente Water Master Plan, dated March 2006, construction of the Reeves Booster Pump Station is needed to efficiently supply potable water from a regional water trunk line (Local Transmission Main) operated by the Joint Regional Water Supply System (JRWSS) to Forester Ranch and Marblehead areas. The proposed location of the new Station is shown on Attachment 3. The project generally includes construction of inlet and outlet piping and valves, a building structure, retaining walls, two vertical turbine pumps, a generator, and electrical instrumentation.

Actions have been taken to publicly bid the project. The City has received protest letters challenging the bids from Elegant Construction Inc. and U.S. Builders & Consultants Inc., the first and second presumptive lowest bidders, respectively. The protests are presented to the City Council who will determine whether to grant or deny the protests following a hearing. The City Council should award the construction contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder following determination of the protest(s). If the protests are denied, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder is Elegant Construction, Inc. If any of the protests are granted, the presumptive second lowest bidder (i.e., U.S. Builders & Consultants, Inc.) or the presumptive third lowest bidder (i.e., RE Chaffee Construction, Inc.) may become the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

Background:

The City of San Clemente Water Master Plan, dated
March 2006, prepared by AKM Consulting Engineers,
planned for the construction of the Reeves Booster Pump Station to supply potable water from a regional water trunk line (Local Transmission Main) operated by the Joint
Regional Water Supply System (JRWSS) to Forester
Ranch and Marblehead areas. This project will address
the current hydraulic restrictions in the existing system 1212
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 10A.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2
during peak demand and provide an alternative supply source for the Reservoir 7 zone, improving the City’s potable water system reliability.

The project includes construction of a 16-inch-diameter inlet and outlet piping, a building structure, retaining walls, valves, flow meters, vaults, two vertical turbine pumps, a generator, and electrical instrumentation. Additional project elements include: coordination with SDG&E for power service to the pump station, switchgear, motor control center, SCADA panel, and instrumentation, startup, and site improvements.

Discussion:

On September 25, 2025, City staff conducted a formal bid for the Reeves Booster Pump Station, CIP Project No. 17405, and received thirteen bids, with a low base bid of $4,214,762. Staff recommended rejecting all bids, re-scoping the project to further identify cost-saving opportunities, revising the project plans and specifications, and re-bidding the project. On November 18, 2025, City Council approved re-scoping the project and rejecting the bids.

AKM Consulting Engineers prepared a new bid package for the Station with the revised scope, staff notified local contractors and advertised the project for competitive bidding on the PlanetBids website and in the SC Times. Ten bids were received on February 26, 2026, ranging from $ 4,093,000 to $6,037,000 for the Base Bid only, and $4,177,000 to $6,109,000 for the Base Bid and Alternates, as shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Bid Summary
Vendor Name City Base Bid
Amount
Base Bid +
Alternate
Bid Amount
Elegant Construction Inc. Irvine $4,093,000 $4,177,000
U.S. Builders & Consultants Inc. Irvine $4,296,800 $4,380,800 RE Chaffee Construction, Inc. Wrightwood $4,408,000 $4,492,000 Environmental Construction, Inc. Woodland Hills $4,447,894 $4,519,804 Pyramid Building and Engineering, Inc. Hesperia $4,489,277 $4,537,277 Mehta Mechanical Company La Palma $4,485,000 $4,545,000 Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. Covina $4,490,000 $4,595,000 Alliance Diversified San Clemente $4,993,143 $5,043,543 SCW Contracting Corp. Fallbrook $5,477,388 $5,545,812
Canyon Springs Enterprises Temecula $6,037,000 $6,109,000 The apparent low bidder for the base bid amount is from Elegant Construction Inc. of Irvine, California, at $4,093,000. Following the bid opening, staff received bid protest letters from RE Chaffee Construction, Inc. (Attachment 4) alleging irregularities in the Elegant Construction, Inc. (i.e., first apparent low bidder) bid documents, and in the second apparent low bidder (i.e., U.S.

Builders & Consultants Inc.) bid documents.
1213
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 10A.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 3
A city generally has the discretion to determine bid responsiveness and may either demand strict compliance with the bid specifications or can choose to waive a defect that is inconsequential or is an immaterial deviation. See Taylor Bus Serv., Inc. v. San Diego Bd. of Educ. (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 1331, 1343. A bid defect cannot be considered inconsequential or immaterial if it gives the bidder an unfair competitive advantage or benefit over other bidders.

The Bid Protest Against Elegant Construction Inc.:

RE Chaffee Construction, Inc. (RE Chaffee) protested on the grounds that Elegant Construction, Inc. bid was allegedly non-responsive based on the following alleged irregularities:
“Experience:

Elegant Construction, Inc. listed experience of jobs for Park Renovation, Pools, Restrooms, Parking lots, and a locker room. None of those projects specify a pump/booster station. As specified, that ‘contractor must specify a minimum of 5 similar completed projects.’ It is our opinion that the jobs listed are not similar to the scope of a booster pump station.

Subcontractors:

Elegant Construction, Inc. failed to list a Masonry subcontractor, Roofing Subcontractor, and Shoring Subcontractor. Listed subcontractors only include Electrical, Roll Up Door, and Pump Installation. Per subcontracting law all subcontractor more than 0.5% of the bid or more than $10,000 must be listed in the bid documents. Based on the experience listed previously Elegant Construction, Inc. has not shown that they have the experience of doing the Masonry wall for the building or the Clay Tile Roofing.

Furthermore, regarding the listed electrical contractor Nexro Energy Inc. when looking up the CSLB contractor License number 1137110 the contractor license was issued less than 1 year ago on 5/6/2025 and workers compensation becoming effective on 11/26/25. This would mean that Nexro Energy Inc. has only been performing electrical work at most 4 months.

Signatures on Bid Docs:

On Pages 5, 7, 13, 19, 23, 24, and 25 of the bid documents Elegant Construction, Inc. electronically signed on all pages for Hazem Almassry. Per California DGS Policy 1240- AUG-2018 All parties must agree or consent to conduct the transaction electronically. The signature must also be capable of verification to confirm the validity of who electronically signed the document.”
In response to RE Chaffee’s protest letter for Elegant Construction Inc. (Elegant), staff has the following responses:

Experience:

The bid documents only requested completion of similar projects, not necessarily identical booster pump station projects. The projects listed by Elegant include public works projects involving structural concrete, shoring, site work, underground utilities, and mechanical installations of water pumps, which are relevant to the scope of work required for this project. Accordingly, this is not a defect.

Subcontractors:
1214
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 10A.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 4
RE Chaffee mentions that Elegant has listed Nexro Energy Inc. as an electrical subcontractor. This is not correct, Elegant’s electrical subcontractor as listed is Halcyon Electric Inc. who holds a C10 License since January 9, 1996. Elegant also holds all the other licenses required to perform the masonry, roofing, and shoring work in this project.

These licenses have been verified from the California Contractor State License Board website. Accordingly, this is not a defect.

Signatures on Bid Docs:

Electronic signatures are permitted under California law, including the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA). The use of electronic signatures does not affect the validity or responsiveness of the bid and is not considered a defect. Furthermore, staff has verified through the State of California, Office of the Secretary of State website, that, in addition to being a Vice President, Hazem Almassry is the Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Elegant Construction Inc. (Attachment 8), making him an authorized signatory. The electronic version of his signature was verified by City staff and is adequate. Signatures are located on Pages 5, 7, 13, 20, 23, 24, and 25 of the bid documents (Attachment 6).

The Bid Protest Against U.S. Builders & Consultants Inc.:

RE Chaffee Construction Inc. (RE Chaffee) protested on the grounds that US Builders and Consultants, Inc. bid was allegedly non-responsive based on the following alleged irregularities:
“Experience:

US Builders and Consultants Inc listed experience of jobs for Site Work, Sidewalks, Concrete, and Playgrounds. As specified, that ‘contractor must specify a minimum of 5 similar completed projects.’ It is our opinion that the jobs listed are not similar to the scope of a booster pump station.

Subcontractors:

US Builders and Consultants Inc's listing shows their lack of understanding of the Project.

They listed a Bypass Subcontractor and a Striping Subcontractor when neither is needed for the project. US Builders and Consultants Inc failed to list a Masonry Subcontractor and Roofing Subcontractor. Their experience listed previous does not show any experience in being able to build the masonry wall nor the clay tile for the booster station. Also let it be noted that NEXRO Energy Inc. had their contractors license issued on 5/6/2025 so they would not have the experience required for work on a Booster Pump Station.

Signatures on Bid Docs:

On Pages 5, 7, 13, 19, 23, 24, and 25 of the bid documents US Builders and Consultants Inc electronically signed on all pages for Tanner Awad. Per California DGS Policy 1240- AUG-2018 All parties must agree or consent to conduct the transaction electronically. The signature must also be capable of verification to confirm the validity of who electronically signed the document.”
In response to RE Chaffee’s protest letter for US Builders and Consultants Inc. (US Builders), staff has the following responses:
1215
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 10A.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 5
Experience:

The bid documents only requested completion of similar projects, not necessarily identical booster pump station projects. The projects listed by US Builders include public works projects involving structural concrete, site work, grading & earthwork, site improvements, paving, sidewalks, concrete, piping, trenching, interior renovation, and pump station.

Accordingly, this is not a defect.

Subcontractors:

There are some subcontractors listed that may not be used in this project; however, the total percentage of their work is less than 3%, not affecting the 50% total project threshold.

US Builders has Nexro Energy Inc. as an electrical subcontractor who holds a C10 License since May 6, 2025. US Builders holds type A-General Engineering and Type B-General Building licenses required to perform the masonry, roofing, and shoring work in this project.

These licenses have been verified from the California Contractor State License Board website. Accordingly, this is not a defect.

Signatures on Bid Docs:

Electronic signatures are permitted under California law, including the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA). The use of electronic signatures does not affect the validity or responsiveness of the bid and is not considered a defect. Upon staff’s request, US Builders has provided a letter (Attachment 9) confirming Tamer Awad is an authorized signatory (see Attachment 10). The electronic version of Tamer Awad’s signature was verified by City staff and is adequate. Signatures are located on Pages 5, 7, 13, 22, and 25 of the bid documents (Attachment 7).

Based on the above responses to both protests against Elegant and US Builders, staff suggests that Elegant Construction Inc. bid was responsive and that the alleged defects were either not defects or were inconsequential and immaterial; therefore, staff recommends that the City Council waive any minor irregularities, and award the contract to Elegant Construction Inc. as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

The alternate work consists of an additional three valves to improve operations. Based on the lowest bid, plus alternate from Elegant Construction, Inc., the total estimated project construction cost is summarized in Table 2 below.

Table 2. Cost Summary
Construction Administration $ 40,000
Engineering Construction Support $ 183,048
Construction Management and Inspection $ 282,158
Construction Contract $ 4,177,000
Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 4,682,206
As required by state law and City policy, the selected contractor must provide performance and payment bonds upon execution of the construction contract (Attachment 2). Project plans and specifications are on file in the City Clerk’s office.
1216
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 10A.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 6
Considerations Identified by Staff:

Construction of the Reeves Booster Pump Station, as recommended per the City of San Clemente Water Master Plan, dated March 2006, will supply potable water from a regional water transmission main (Local Transmission Main) to Forster Ranch and Marblehead areas and to Reservoir 7 during high-demand periods, relieving hydraulic restrictions within the existing system under peak demands, improving system reliability.

If the Reeves Booster Pump Station is not constructed, during periods of high-water demand and system outages, pressures in the Local Transmission Main struggle to supply Reservoir 7. During these periods, City staff has to adjust pressure reducing stations and split zones to properly convey water between the Reservoir 7 and 13 zones. In addition, during times of water supply planned outages, a temporary pumping system has been installed to serve customers in the service zones. A permanent pump station will alleviate the flow restrictions and improve system reliability.

Council Options:
 Adopt Resolution No. 26-87 (Attachment 1), rejecting the bid protests submitted by RE Chaffee Construction, Inc., waiving any minor bid irregularities in the bid submitted by Elegant Construction Inc., awarding the contract for the project to Elegant Construction Inc., as the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid, approving a supplemental appropriation of $2,037,200 into project Account No. 052-467-45300-000-17405, and finding the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 1 and Class 3 (Existing Facilities and New Construction or Conversion, 14 CCR Section 15301 and 15303 respectively) of the State CEQA Guidelines, and authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction contract in an amount not to exceed $4,177,000.  Grant one or more of the bid protests submitted by RE Chaffee Construction, Inc. and modify and adopt Resolution No. 26-87 accordingly to award the construction contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.
 Continue the item and direct staff to provide additional information.  Do not adopt Resolution No. 26-87 and put the project on hold.

Environmental Review/Analysis:

This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 1 and Class 3 of the State CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15301 and 15303, respectively – Existing Facilities and New Construction or Conversion. A revised Notice of Exemption is being filed for the revised Project.

Fiscal Impact:

If a contract is awarded to Elegant Construction Inc., the total estimated construction cost is $4,682,206. The current project funding balance from Account No. 052-467-45300-000-17405, Reeves Booster Pump Station, in the Water Fund Acreage Fee Reserve is $2,854,000. A supplemental appropriation of $2,037,200 is recommended from the Water Fund Depreciation 1217
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 10A.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 7
Reserve to construct the improvements and fund additional expenses if needed. There is sufficient fund balance for this proposed supplemental appropriation.

Potential Action(s):
..recommendation
If the City Council concurs with the contents of the staff report, appropriate actions include:
..recommendation

1. Conduct a bid protest hearing, open the hearing, hear public testimony and comments, including any evidence and argument presented by the bidders, and close the hearing; AND, after the protest hearing, adopt Resolution No. 26-87 (Attachment 1), which would:

2. Find the Reeves Booster Pump Station Rehabilitation, CIP Project No. 17405, categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 1 and Class 3 of the State CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15301 and 15303, respectively; and

3. Deny the bid protest submitted by RE Chaffee Construction, Inc., and find the bid submitted by Elegant Construction, Inc. either not defective or waive any immaterial bid irregularity in the bid submitted by Elegant Construction, Inc.;

4. Approve a supplemental appropriation, in an amount of $2,037,200, from the Water Fund Depreciation Reserve to project Account No. 052-467-45300-000-17405;

5. Award the Reeves Booster Pump Station Rehabilitation, CIP Project No. 17405, construction contract to Elegant Construction, Inc., as the lowest responsible and responsive bidder; and

6. Authorize the City Manager to execute a construction contract with Elegant Construction, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $4,177,000, in a form substantially similar to Contract No. C26-38 (Attachment 2).
..end
Attachment:

1. Resolution No. 26-87

2. Construction Contract with Elegant Construction, Inc. (w/o attachments, attachments are on file with and available for review with the City Clerk)

3. Location Map

4. Bid Protest Letters

5. Bid Protest Response Letter

6. Elegant Construction Inc. bid

7. US Builders and Consultants Inc. bid

8. Elegant State Corporation Information

9. US Builders Authorization Letter
Notification:

All Bidders.
1218
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 26-87

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, DENYING BID PROTEST,

AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE
REEVES BOOSTER PUMP STATION, CIP PROJECT NO.
17405 TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE AND

RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT, AND FINDING

THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
UNDER CLASS 1 AND CLASS 3 OF THE STATE CEQA
GUIDELINES, SECTIONS 15301 AND 15303,

RESPECTIVELY
WHEREAS, the City of San Clemente Water Master Plan, dated March 2006, recommended construction of the Reeves Booster Pump Station (Project) to supply potable water from a regional water main trunk (Local Transmission Main) to Forster Ranch and Marblehead areas; and
WHEREAS, the Project is needed due to hydraulic restrictions within the existing system under peak demands; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Reeves Booster Pump Station will convey water to the Reservoir 7 zone and provide an alternate supply source, which improves system reliability; and
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2025, City staff conducted a formal competitive bidding for the Reeves Booster Pump Station, CIP Project No. 17405, and received thirteen bids; and
WHEREAS, upon evaluation, City staff recommended rejecting all bids, conducting a process of value engineering, re-scoping to further identify cost-saving opportunities while maintaining the required level of serviceability, revising the Project plans and specifications accordingly, and re-bidding the project; and
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2025, City Council approved rejecting the bids received on September 25, 2025; and
WHEREAS, AKM Consulting Engineers prepared a new bid package for the Station based on a revised scope, staff notified local contractors, and advertised the project for competitive bidding on the PlanetBids website and in the SC Times; and WHEREAS, ten bids were received on February 26, 2026, ranging from $4,093,000 to $6,037,000 for the Base Bid only, and $4,177,000 to $6,109,000 for the Base Bid and Alternates; and
WHEREAS, the apparent lowest bid for the base bid amount was Elegant Construction Inc. of Irvine, California, at $4,093,000; and 1219 Resolution No. 26-87 Page 2
WHEREAS, following the bid opening on February 26, 2026, staff received a bid protest letter from RE Chaffee Construction, Inc. alleging irregularities in the Elegant Construction, Inc. bid documents; and
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed protest hearing and considered all evidence and comment submitted at or before the public hearing, including from any and all bidders.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Clemente does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are considered findings by the City Council and incorporated fully into the body of this resolution.

SECTION 2. That based on a review of the record as a whole, the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 1 and Class 3 (Existing and New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, 14 CCR section 15301 and 15303 respectively) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it includes minor improvements by adding a water pump station with associated utility extensions to the existing water lines within the project site, and there is no possibility of a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect substantial impact on the environment.

SECTION 3. That the City Council finds that the alleged irregularities in Elegant Construction, Inc.’s bid do not render the bid defective or nonresponsive and that to the extent that any irregularity exists in Elegant Construction, Inc.’s bid it is hereby determined to be an inconsequential and immaterial bid defect because the alleged irregularities did not affect the amount of the bid, make the bid materially different than intended, nor give Elegant Construction, Inc. an unfair competitive advantage or benefit over the other bidders. Strict compliance with the bid documents for the alleged deviations are hereby waived and the bid protest filed by RE Chaffee Construction Inc. is hereby denied.

SECTION 4. That a supplemental appropriation, in an amount of $2,037,200, from the Water Fund Depreciation Reserve to the project Account No. 052-467-45300-000-17405 is hereby approved.

SECTION 5. That the City Council finds that Elegant Construction, Inc. is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, and the construction contract for the Reeves Booster Pump Station, CIP Project No. 17405, is hereby awarded to Elegant Construction, Inc.

SECTION 6. That the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute a construction contract for the Reeves Booster Pump Station, CIP Project No. 17405 with Elegant Construction, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $4,177,000, in a form substantially similar to that presented to City Council on May 19, 2026.

SECTION 7. That the City Manager or their designee is hereby authorized and directed to take such other and further actions as are necessary and proper to accomplish the purposes of this resolution and complete the Project.

SECTION 8. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. 1220
Resolution No. 26-87 Page 3
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2026.

ATTEST:

City Clerk of the City of Rick Loeffler, Mayor of the
San Clemente, California City of San Clemente, California

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) §

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, LAURA CAMPAGNOLO, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 26-87 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Clemente held on the day of ,
, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this day of , .

CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
Approved as to form:

Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
1221
Attachment 2
SECTION 00500

CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made this _____ day of _________, 2026, in the County of Orange, State of California, by and between the City of San Clemente hereinafter called City, and Elegant Construction, Inc., hereinafter called Contractor. City and the Contractor for the considerations stated herein agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF WORK. The Contractor shall perform all Work within the time stipulated the contract and shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, utility services, and transportation to complete all of the Work required in strict compliance with the Contract Documents as specified in Article 5 below for the following Project:

REEVES BOOSTER PUMP STATION
The Contractor and its surety shall be liable to City for any damages arising as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with this obligation.

ARTICLE 2. TIME FOR COMPLETION. The Work shall be commenced on the dates stated in City’s Notice to Proceeds. The project will have two Notice to Proceeds (NTP’s): the 1st NTP to begin administrative work (shop drawing submittals, material procurement, etc.), and the 2nd NTP to begin mobilization and site work. The 2nd NTP shall not occur later than 60 working days after the 1st NTP. The Contractor shall complete all Work required by the Contract Documents within 300 working days from the commencement date stated in the 2nd Notice to Proceed. By its signature hereunder, Contractor agrees the time for completion set forth above is adequate and reasonable to complete the Work.

ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT PRICE. City shall pay to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract and the Work, which includes everything that is reasonably foreseeable related thereto, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs, the sum of Four Million One Hundred Seventy-Seven Thousand Dollars ($4,177,000). Payment shall be made as set forth in the General Conditions.

At any time during the term of the Contract, City may, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Contract Documents, request that the Contractor perform additional work. Contractor shall not perform, nor be compensated for, additional work without written authorization from the City pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Contract Documents.

ARTICLE 4. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES/EARLY COMPLETION INCENTIVE. In accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, it is agreed that the Contractor will pay City the sum of $1,000 for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the time prescribed in the Contract Documents for finishing the Work, as Liquidated Damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. In the event that Liquidated Damages are not paid, the Contractor agrees City may deduct that amount from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the Contract. This Article does not exclude recovery of other damages specified in the Contract Documents.

ARTICLE 5. COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT. The “Contract Documents” include the following:

Notice Inviting Bids
1222

Page 2 ends

Instructions to Bidders
Bid Form
Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation Bid Bond
Non-Collusion Declaration Form
Contractor Information and Experience Form
List of Subcontractors Form
Iran Contracting Act Certification
Public Works Contractor Registration Certification
Contract
Performance Bond
Payment Bond
General Conditions
Special Conditions
Technical Specifications
Addenda
Plans and Drawings
Approved and fully executed change orders
Any other documents contained in or incorporated into the Contract The Contactor shall complete the Work in strict accordance with all of the Contract Documents.

All of the Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Work required by one of the Contract Documents and not by others shall be done as if required by all. This Contract shall supersede any prior agreement of the parties.

ARTICLE 6. PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW. Each and every provision of law required to be included in these Contract Documents shall be deemed to be included in these Contract Documents. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the California Labor Code and California Public Contract Code which are applicable to this Project.

ARTICLE 7. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor shall provide indemnification as set forth in the General Conditions.

ARTICLE 8. PREVAILING WAGES. Contractor shall be required to pay the prevailing rate of wages in accordance with the Labor Code which such rates shall be made available at City of San Clemente Public Works Department or may be obtained online at http//www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr. and which must be posted at the job site.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Contract has been duly executed by the above-named parties, on the day and year above written.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the respective dates set forth opposite of their signatures.

1223

Page 3 ends

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
By:________________________________
Andy Hall, City Manager
ATTEST: Dated: __________________, ______
____________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney

APPROVED AS TO AVAILABILITY
OF FUNDING:
_____________________________
Finance Authorization
Elegant Construction, Inc.
________________________
(“CONTRACTOR”)
By:_____________________________
(Name, Title)
Dated: __________________, ______
By:_____________________________
(Name, Title)
Dated: __________________, ______

END OF CONTRACT
1224

CAM FARO

CLE FRONTERA

AVE OLIVA

CAM LAUREL VIA AGUILA

AVE VISTA HERMOSA

VIA SAN ANDREAS

AVE FACETA

VIA ZAFIRO

VIA MERO CLE OPALO

EL CAMINO REAL

VIA SOCORRO

EBB TIDE DR

BREAKER DR

PALM DR SEA BREEZE DR

BEACH DR CAM

AVE ESPADA
A. T. & S. F. R. R.

CLE TINAJA VIA SENDA

VIA CHALUPA CLE BURRO

CLE CUADRA

VIA ARBOLEDA

VIA MONTECITO VIA SANTO TOMAS

VIA VISTOSA

VIA CASA LOMA

VIA VERBENA

VIA MONTEZUMA

VIA MONTEGO VIA BANDITA VIA LADO

VIA MONTECITO

CLE VISTA TORITO VIA MONTEGO

VIA ALEGRE

CLE BARANDA CLE GAUCHO CLE DESCANSO

CLE JUAREZ

CLE MACHO

SORPRESO

CLE FRONTERA CLE LUEGO

CLE AMIGO

AVE MAREJADA CLE BALANDRA

CAM FARO

CAM GALEON

CAM ANCLA

CLE PAISANO

CLE CHUECA VIA CHUECA

CLE OLA VERDE

VIA CONCHA

AVE FACETA

CAM LAUREL

VIA TECA

VIA GAVILAN

AVE PLATANAR

CLE CIDRA

AVE OLIVA PASEO LARO

AVE VISTA HERMOSA

VIA TURQUEZA

VIA CASCADITA

SANDY DR

AVE VAQUERO

PACIFIC COAST HWY

VIA BALLENA
V

J AI UAREZ
CLE

SAN CLEMENTE
CAM. BUCANERO

CAM CORSO RIO

AVE MASTIL

CLE ALMIRANTE

CORTE CALAMAR

VIA MERLUZA

VIA BARRACUDA

CORTE MERLANGO

VIA MERLUZA

CLE LOBINA

VIA SARGO

CLE CHAYOTE

VIA PERA
CORTE

TOPACIO

VIA AGUILA

VIA PALMITO

VIAZUMAQUE

VIA CEREZA

AVE OLIVA

VIA MANTARAYA

VIA MERLA

SAN DIEGO FREEWAY

CLE LAGO

EL CAMINO REAL (COAST HWY) CLE DE LOS MOLINOS

AVE PICO

LOS OBREROS LN CLE VALLE

AVE DE LA CLE REDONDEL

CLE BONITO

RINCON CT

CLE DE INDUSTRIAS AVE NAVARRO

VIA PICO PLAZA

ESTRELLA

MARBLEHEAD COASTAL
DE LOS

CALLE MOLINOS

SAN CLEMENTE WATER RECLAMATION

PLANT MARBLEHEAD

VIA TECA

CLE FRONTERA

NOT TO SCALE

PROJECT

LOCATION

LOCATION MAP
Reeves Booster
Pump Station
PN 17405
Attachment 3
1225
RE Chaffee Construction Inc.
6025 Park Drive
Wrightwood CA 92397
Lie# 897948
3/3/26
Reeves Booster Pump Station Bid Protest for Elegant Construction Inc Subject: Protest for Elegant Construction Inc
After a Review of the Bid Documents submitted by Elegant Construction Inc we have identified a few items Experience:

Elegant Construction Inc listed experience of jobs for Park Renovation, Pools, Restrooms, Parking lots, and a locker room. None of those projects specify a pump/booster station. As specified, that "contractor must specify a minimum of 5 similar completed projects." It is our opinion that the jobs listed are not similar to the scope of a booster pump station
Subcontractors:

Elegant Construction Inc failed to list a Masonry subcontractor, Roofing Subcontractor, and Shoring Subcontractor.

Listed subcontractors only include Electrical, Roll Up Door, and Pump Installation. Per subcontracting law all subcontractor more than 0.5% of the bid or more than $10,000 must be listed in the bid documents. Based on the experience listed previously Elegant Construction Inc has not shown that they have the experience of doing the Masonry wall for the building or the Clay Tile Roofing
Furthermore, regarding the listed electrical contractor Nexro Energy Inc when looking up the CSLB contractor License number 1137110 the contractor license was issued less than 1 year ago on 5/6/2025 and workers compensation becoming effective on 11/26/25. This would mean that Nexro Energy Inc has only been performing electrical work at most 4 months.

Signatures on Bid Docs:

On Pages 5, 7, 13, 19, 23, 24, and 25 of the bid documents Elegant Construction Inc electronically signed on all pages for Hazem Almassry. Per California DGS Policy 1240-AUG-2018 All parties must agree or consent to conduct the transaction electronically. The signature must also be capable of verification to confirm the validity of who electronically signed the document.

Attachment 4
1226
For these reasons RE Chaffee believes that Elegant Construction Inc should be found non-responsive and the contract should go to the next responsible bidder.

Ronald Chaffee, President
March 3, 2026
1227
1228
Engineering Division 910 Calle Negocio, Suite 100 San Clemente CA 92672 City of San Clemente
Engineering Division
Belgin Cuhadaroglu, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
Phone: (949) 361-6128
[email protected]
April 13, 2026
Mr. Ronald Chaffee, President
RE Chaffee Construction Inc.
1253 Evergreen Rd
Wrightwood, CA 92397
SUBJECT: Response to Bid Protest Letters - Reeves Booster Pump Station Project No. 17405
Dear Mr. Chaffee,
The City of San Clemente acknowledges receipt of your bid protest letters, dated March 3, 2026, regarding the Reeves Booster Pump Station Project, following the bid opening on February 26, 2026. Please see below:

Protest Letter for Elegant Construction, Inc.

City staff has carefully reviewed the concerns raised in your protest letter regarding the bid submitted by Elegant Construction, Inc. After a thorough evaluation of the protest and the bid documents, City provides the following responses:

Experience:

The bid documents only requested completion of similar projects, not necessarily identical booster pump station projects. The projects listed by Elegant Construction Inc. include public works projects involving structural concrete, shoring, site work, underground utilities, and mechanical installations of water pumps, which are relevant to the scope of work required for this project.

Subcontractors:

You mention that Elegant Construction Inc. has listed Nexro Energy Inc. as an electrical subcontractor. This is not correct, Elegant’s electrical subcontractor as listed is Halcyon Electric Inc. who holds a C10 License since January 9, 1996. Elegant also holds all the other licenses required to perform the masonry, roofing, and shoring work in this project. These Attachment 5
1229
City of San Clemente Page 2
licenses have been verified from the California Contractor State License Board website.

Signatures on Bid Docs:

Protest Letter for US Builders and Consultants, Inc.

The City is not awarding a contract to US Builders and Consultants, Inc.; therefore, no responses are provided to your comments.

Based on the above responses to your protest letter for Elegant Construction, Inc., staff finds Elegant Construction, Inc. bid to be responsive, and recommends that the City Council award a construction contract to Elegant Construction, Inc., as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, in the City Council meeting on May 5, 2026.

The City appreciates your participation in the bidding process and your interest in this project.

Sincerely,
Belgin Cuhadaroglu
Senior Civil Engineer, P.E.

Attachments: Protest Letter from RE Chaffee Construction, Inc. 1230
14 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
SECTION 00400

BID FORM
NAME OF BIDDER:

The undersigned, hereby declare that we have carefully examined the location of the proposed Work, and have read and examined the Contract Documents, including all plans, specifications, and all addenda, if any, for the following Project:

REEVES BOOSTER PUMP STATION
We hereby propose to furnish all labor, materials, equipment, tools, transportation, and services, and to discharge all duties and obligations necessary and required to perform and complete the Project for the following TOTAL BID PRICE:

BASE BID SCHEDULE
Bid
Item
No.

Bid Item Description * Est.

Qty
Unit of
Measure Unit Price Total Item Cost
1 Mobilization/Demobilization 1 LS
2 Clear and Grub 1 LS
3 Excavation and Grading 1 LS
4 Construct Pump Station Below
Grade Structural Items 1 LS
5 Construct Pump Station Above
Grade Structural Items 1 LS
6 Construct Pump Station 16-Inch
Suction Piping 1 LS
7 Construct Pump Station 16-Inch
No-Pump Bypass Piping 1 LS
8 Construct Pump Station 16-Inch
Discharge Piping 1 LS
9 Construct Pump Station 10-Inch
Discharge Piping 1 LS
10 Construct Pump Station Vertical
Turbine Pump and Motor
Assemblies
2 EA
11 Construct Pump Station 12-Inch
Discharge Piping 2 EA
12 Construct Pump Station 6-Inch
Surge Piping and Sump Pump
System
1 LS
Elegant Construction Inc
$110,000.00
$20,000.00
$200,000.00
$300,000.00
$400,000.00
$110,000.00
$20,000.00
$200,000.00
$300,000.00
$400,000.00
$400,000.00
$250,000.00
$250,000.00
$150,000.00
$350,000.00
$180,000.00
$100,000.00
$400,000.00
$250,000.00
$250,000.00
$150,000.00
$175,000.00
$ 90,000.00
$100,000.00
Attachment 6
1231
SECTION 00400

BID FORM
15 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
Bid
Item
No.

Bid Item Description * Est.

Qty
Unit of
Measure Unit Price Total Item Cost
13 Construct Pump Station Suction
Meter Vault 1 LS
14 Construct SDG&E Electrical
Service 1 LS
15 Construct Switchboard/Meter
Section 1 LS
16 Construct Motor Control Center 1 LS
17 Construct Pump Station Electrical
Items 1 LS
18 Testing and Commissioning 1 LS
19 Demolish/Abandon Existing
Turnout Facilities 1 LS
20 Construct Civil Restorations 1 LS
21 Field Order Allowance 1 LS $70,000 $70,000
22 Overexcavation Allowance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
23 Construct Water Quality Analyzer 1 LS
* See Spec Section 01030 Measurement and Payment for description of above bid items.

Each individual bidder shall review the Plans and Specifications, and all other portions of the Contract Documents, and shall include all items necessary to complete the Work, including the assumption of all obligations, duties, and responsibilities necessary to the successful completion of the Contract, and the furnishing of all materials and equipment required to be incorporated in and form a permanent part of the Work: tools, equipment, supplies, transportation, facilities, labor, superintendence, and services required to perform and complete the Work; and bonds, insurance and submittals; all as per the requirements of the Contract Documents, whether or not explicitly listed or designated.

In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the item cost set forth for a unit basis item, the unit price shall prevail and, shall be utilized as the basis for determining the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. However, if the amount set forth as a unit price is ambiguous, unintelligible or uncertain for any cause, or is omitted, or is the same amount as the entry in the “Item Cost” column, then the amount set forth in the “Item Cost” column for the item shall prevail and shall be divided by the estimated quantity for the item and the price thus obtained shall be the unit price.

If any of the above discrepancies exist, the City may recalculate the bid price on the basis of the unit price and the bidder agrees to be bound by such recalculation. $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00
$50,000.00
$75,000.00
$38,000.00
$50,000.00
$75,000.00
$38,000.00
$30,000.00
$80,000.00
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$65,000.00
$30,000.00
$80,000.00
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$65,000.00
1232
SECTION 00400

BID FORM
16 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
It is understood that the quantities shown for the unit price items are approximate only and subject to increase or decrease, being stated only for the purpose of comparing bids and fixing the amount of surety bonds, and that should the quantity of work on the unit price basis be increased, the undersigned Bidder will perform the additional work at the unit price set out herein, and that should the quantity be decreased, payment is to be made on the actual quantity installed at such unit price, and the undersigned Bidder will make no claims for anticipated profits or additional compensation for any increase or decrease in the quantity. It is further understood that actual quantities on the unit price items will be determined upon completion of the work covered by the Contract.

Final payment shall be determined by the Engineer from measured quantities of work performed based upon the unit price.

If the Contract Documents specify alternate bid items, the following Alternate Bid amounts shall be added to or deducted from the Total Bid Price (please check the appropriate box), at the City’s sole option. The City can choose to include one or more of the Alternate Bids in the Work. If any of the Alternate Bids are selected by the City, the resulting amount shall be added to or deducted from Total Bid Price for the Work. City may select one or more of the Alternate Bids at the below stated Bid Price up to sixty (60) days following award of the Contract. City can award/select Alternate Bid items at any time(s).

Alternate
Bid Item
No.

Bid Item Description * Est.

Qty
Unit of
Measure Unit Price Total Item Cost
A1
□ Add
□ Deduct
Additional 16-Inch Gate Valves 3 EA
A2
□ Add
□ Deduct
A3
□ Add
□ Deduct
* See Spec Section 01030 Measurement and Payment for description of above bid items.

TOTAL BID PRICE (BASED ON BASE BID SCHEDULE):
$ ________________________________________
Total Base Bid Price in Numbers
__________________________________________________________________________ Total Base Bid Price in Written Form
In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail. In case of a discrepancy between the electronic bid form in the City’s Planet Bids system $28,000.00 $84,000.00
$4,093,000.00
Four million, ninety-three thousand dollars
1233
SECTION 00400

BID FORM
17 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
(if used) and this completed bid form, the signed hardcopy bid form (or scanned signed form uploaded to the City’s Planet Bids system, shall prevail.

The undersigned agrees that this Bid Form constitutes a firm offer to City which cannot be withdrawn for the number of calendar days indicated in the Notice Inviting Bids from the bid opening, or until a Contract for the Work is fully executed by City and a third party, whichever is earlier.

The Contract duration shall commence on the date stated in City’s Notice to Proceed, and shall be completed by the Contractor in the time specified in the Contract Documents. In no case shall the Contractor commence construction prior to the date stated in City’s Notice to Proceed.

Bidder certifies that it is licensed in accordance with the law providing for the registration of Contractors, License No. _________, Expiration Date _______, class of license _____. If the bidder is a joint venture, each member of the joint venture must include the above information.

The undersigned acknowledges receipt, understanding and full consideration of the following addenda to the Contract Documents.

Addenda No. _______________________
Addenda No. _______________________
Addenda No. _______________________
Bidder has attached the following:

1. The completed Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation form.

2. The required bid security in the amount of not less than 10% of the Total Bid Price.

3. The fully executed Non-Collusion Declaration form.

4. The completed Contractor Information and Experience form.

5. The completed List of Subcontractors form.

6. The completed Iran Contracting Act Certification form (for bids of $1,000,000 or more).

7. The completed Public Works Contractor Registration Certification form.

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that all of the information submitted in connection with this Bid and all of the representations made herein, including Contractor’s license number and expiration date, are true and correct. I further certify that the signatory below is authorized to submit this Bid and bind the Bidder to the terms of these Contract Documents.

Name of Bidder
1053447 05-31-27
A, B, C8, C12, C13,
C15, C36, C54
Elegant Construction Inc
None
1234
SECTION 00400

BID FORM
18 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
Signature
Name
Title
Dated

END OF BID FORM
Vice President
Hazem Almassry
02-25-2026
1235
19 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
Section 00405
WORKER’S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION

WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION

I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:

(ONE OF THE BOXES BELOW MUST BE CHECKED)
I have and will maintain a certificate of consent from the California Labor Commission to self-insure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this contract.

I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this contract. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:

Carrier____________________________________________________ Policy Number______________________________________________

I certify that, in the performance of the work under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, and I hereby agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of San Clemente and all of its officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, and losses relating to personal injury or death, economic losses, and property damage arising out of my failure to provide such worker’s compensation insurance. I further agree that, if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, I shall forthwith comply with those provisions.

WARNING: FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL, AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO

CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000), IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY’S FEES.

Wesco Insurance Company
WEP3775439
1236
55452.01510\32905704.2
20 Dated: _______________________
________________________________
Consultant
By: ________________________________
________________________________
Title
________________________________
Address
________________________________
Vice President
15375 Barranca Parkway suite J-103
Irvine CA92618
02-25-26
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
23 SECTION 00420

NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION
SECTION 00420

NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION
The undersigned declares:

I am the ______________ of _________________, the party making the foregoing bid.

The bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham.

The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the bid are true.

The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.

Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the bidder.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on ____________________[date], at ___________________[city], ___________________[state].

Name of Bidder
Signature
Name
Title
Dated

END OF NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION
Vice President Elegant Construction Inc
02-25-2026
Irvine California
Elegant Construction Inc
Hazem Almassry
Vice President
02-25-2026
1243
24 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
A. INFORMATION ABOUT BIDDER
**Failure to complete all information may render your bid nonresponsive - indicate not applicable (“N/A”) where appropriate.**
NOTE: Where Bidder is a joint venture, pages shall be duplicated and information provided for all parties to the joint venture.

1.0 Name of Bidder: ___________________________________________

2.0 Type, if Entity: ___________________________________________

3.0 Bidder Address: ___________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Facsimile Number Telephone Number
Email Address_______________________________________
Website Address

4.0 How many years has Bidder’s organization been in business as a Contractor? _______

5.0 How many years has Bidder’s organization been in business under its present name? ________________________

5.1 Under what other or former names has Bidder’s organization operated?_______________________________________________

6.0 If Bidder’s organization is a corporation, answer the following:

6.1 Date of Incorporation: ________________________________

6.2 State of Incorporation: ________________________________

6.3 President’s/CEO Name: ________________________________

6.4 Vice President’s Name(s): ________________________________

6.5 Secretary’s Name: ________________________________

6.6 Treasurer’s Name: ________________________________

7.0 If an individual or a partnership, answer the following:

Elegant Construction Inc
S Corporation
15375 Barranca Parkway suite J-103
Irvine CA92618
949 444-5161
[email protected]
www.ElegantCon.com
6 6
N/A
California
Jan-07-2019
Sam Alhakim
Hazem Almassry
Hazem Almassry
Hazem Almassry
1244
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
25 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM

7.1 Date of Organization: ____________________________________

8.0 If other than a corporation or partnership, describe organization and name principals:
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________

9.0 List other states in which Bidder’s organization is legally qualified to do business. ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________

10.0 What type of work does the Bidder normally perform with its own forces? ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________

11.0 Has Bidder ever failed to complete any work awarded to it? If so, note when, where, and why:
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________

12.0 Has the Bidder ever been in default, debarred or suspended in any way? If so, note when and why:
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________

13.0 Within the last five years, has any officer or partner of Bidder’s organization ever been an officer or partner of another organization when it failed to complete a contract? If so, attach a separate sheet of explanation:
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________

14.0 List Trade References (Materials Suppliers, Vendors, Union Representatives, etc.:
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ N/A
N/A

GENERAL BUILDING, CONCRETE, GENERAL ENGINEERING, PLUMBING, FENCING

TILE (CERAMIC AND MOSAIC), EARTHWORK AND PAVING, FLOORING No
No
No
Homedebot
LW Supply
Ganahl Lumber
1245
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
26 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM

16.0 Name of Bonding Company and Name and Address, email address and phone number of Agent:
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Chase Bank
Irvine, California
Performance Bonding Surety & Insurance Brokerage
15901 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 100 Tustin, CA 92780
Jennifer Anaya
1246
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
27 SECTION 00430

KETCHUM-LIBOLT PARK
IMPROVEMENT PARK IMPROVEMENT April/2026 $2,640,337.00
Colton Middle School Interim
Housing
Marlene Lozano 909-580-5000
Anna Baca 714-754-4983
Classroom Addition Feb 2026 $256,500.00
$597,000.00
$2,105,000.00
$1,268,375.00
$2,227,000.00
$4,250,000.00
$433,975.25
$3,097,000.00
$363,000.00
$3,235,525.00
$1,307,800.00
May -26
April/2026
April/2026
March 26
Feb - 2026
Sep 2026
April 2026
Dec 2026
May 2026
Feb 2026

HVAC AT RIVERA PARK

AND PICO PARK GYMNASIUMS
CIP PROJECT NO. 50069

COSTA MESA SKATE PARK

EXPANSION
900 ARLINGTON DR 25-01
Fullerton College Building
1246 AHU Replacement
Crystal Nguyen 714-808-4775
Goutam Dobey 909-435-7431
Building Renovation
& Expansion
Skate park expansion
Replace Building 1246
office suites
Turf Renovation Field
Joint Utilities Laboratory
Project Invitation # 521028
Marilyn Buescher 714-573-3334
Tustin Sports Park
Turf Renovation Field #3
Amy Drummond 909.748.6716 Pool Replacement
Redlands East Valley High School
Pool Replacement
OCC Breezeway Renovations
Buildings 12-14 2207
Brett McNevin [email protected]
OCC Renovations Buildings
PARK IMPROVEMENT Trai Nguyen (951) 955-6780
Mecca Neighborhood Park
Edgar Vallejo 949-724-6937
Public Safety Locker
Room Expansion
The renovation, expansion and
equipping of locker room
Monument Sign installation
Euclid Ave. Monument
Sign Project
Philip Marino 909-395-2610
2 Gyms Remodeling
1247
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
28 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
C. LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS LAST FIVE YEARS
**Duplicate Page if needed for listing additional completed projects** Please include only those projects which are similar enough to demonstrate Bidder’s ability to perform the required Work. The Bidder must specify a minimum of five (5) similar completed projects within the past five (5) years. Failure to meet or exceed this requirement may cause the bid to be rejected as nonresponsive.

Client Description of
Bidder’s Work
Period of
Performance
Cost of
Bidder’s Work
Contact Name
& Phone

City of Irvine
Northwood Aquatics Center Deck
Replacement (CIP 362004)
$2,380,000 Bobby Ghaemi
714-345-5002
City of Lake Forest
Neighborhood Park Renovations
Start: May 2023
Completed: May 2023 $936,893.50
Naz Mokarram
949-282-5233
El Toro High School – Restrooms
Shower Alterations
Saddleback Valley Unified
School District $849,000 Max Van de Mortel
949-580-3250
Renovation including demolition, mechanical
systems, plumbing tie-ins, and electrical upgrades. Start: Mar 2023 Completed: Oct 2023
Start: Jun 2023
Completed: Dec 2023
Pool and deck improvements with plumbing
fixtures, shower fixtures, underground
electrical conduit, power and data conduits.

Construction power, wiring, potable water facilities,
and fire protection system utilities
North Orange County Community
College District
$148,000 July 2024
Completed: Sep 2024
General construction including remodeling of
classroom space,interior improvements, and
building system adjustments.

Corazon C. Baldovino
714.808.4894
Police Department Communication
Center Renovation Project CC-1677
Room 907 Tenant Improvement at
Anaheim CampusInvitation
City of Huntington Beach Patrick Pannon $1,680,000.00 714-536-5430 Demolition of existing walls and ceiling tiles, replacement of flooring, walls, ceilings, and finishes,upgrades to electrical, data, and HVAC systems installation of furniture, and integration of audio/visual equipment such as wall-mounted monitors and video processor hardware.

September 2023
Completed: April 2025
City of Tustin
Centennial park
Park renovation July 2024 to May 2025 $5,068,238.55 Churchill, Jason : 714-573-3355
City of Irvine
Public Safety Locker Room
Expansion
$2,105,000.00 Edgar Vallejo
949-724-6937
Sep-2025
April 2026
City of Newport Beach
Police Department Parking
Lot Maintenance
$585,000.00 Ellis Petersen
949-644-3014 December 2024
Locker Room Expansion
Parking Lot Maintenance
1248
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
29 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
D. EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE Personnel:

The Bidder shall identify the key personnel to be assigned to this project in a management, construction supervision or engineering capacity.

1. List each person’s job title, name and percent of time to be allocated to this project:

2. Summarize each person’s specialized education:

3. List each person’s years of construction experience relevant to the project:

4. Summarize such experience:

Bidder agrees that any personnel named in this Bid will remain on this Project until completion of all relevant Work, unless substituted by personnel of equivalent experience and qualifications approved in advance by City.

Samer Al Hakim / CEO
Majed Alnabhan Project Manager
Project Manager Full time
Superintedent Full time
Aya Sahloul Project Engineer full time
Sam Alhakim bachelor degree in Civil Engineering
bachelor degree in Civil Engineering
Majed Alnabhan High school
Aya Sahloul
Sam Alhakim
Majed Alnabhan
Aya Sahloul
15 Years
5 Years
20 Years
Supervising and perform general Carpentry works including Framing, forming of concrete forms , calculating Material quantity, also he was performing Siding works and other finishing activity 1249
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
30 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
Additional Bidder’s Statements:

If the Bidder feels that there is additional information which has not been included in the questionnaire above, and which would contribute to the qualification review, it may add that information in a statement here or on an attached sheet, appropriately marked:

E. VERIFICATION AND EXECUTION
These Bid Forms shall be executed only by a duly authorized official of the Bidder:

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing information is true and correct:

Name of Bidder
Signature
Name
Title
Dated

END OF CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
Elegant Construction Inc
Hazem Almassry
Vice President
02-25-26
1250
55452.01510\32905704.2
31 SECTION 00440

LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
SECTION 00440

LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
In compliance with the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act of the Public Contract Code of the State of California, each bidder shall set forth below: (a) the name and the location of the place of business, (b) the California contractor license number and DIR registration number, and (c) the portion of the work which will be done by each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction of the work in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent (1/2%) of the Contractor’s Total Bid Price. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the work involves streets and highways, then the Contractor shall list each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to Contractor in or about the work in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent (1/2%) of the Contractor’s Total Bid Price or $10,000, whichever is greater. No additional time shall be granted to provide the below requested information.

If no subcontractor is specified, for a portion of the work, or if more than one subcontractor is specified for the same portion of Work, then the Contractor shall be deemed to have agreed that it is fully qualified to perform that Work, and that it shall perform that portion itself. The Prime Contractor is required to complete at least 50% of the contract value with its own forces.

Work to be
done by
Subcontractor
Subcontractor Location of
Business
CSLB Contractor
License No.

DIR Registration
Number
% of the
Work
Roll up door Overhead Door Company 12401 S La Cadena Dr Colton, CA 92324 492369 1000017098

HALCYON ELECTRIC

INCORPORATED
1055-A ORTEGA WAY
PLACENTIA, CA 92870 717223 1000001849

HATHAWAY ENGINEERING
8392 GRAND AVE

YUCCA VALLEY
CA 92284
Pump Installation 1052643 2000014023
Electrical Works 29.5%

0.5%
2%
1251
SECTION 00440

LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
32 SECTION 00440

LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
Work to be
done by
Subcontractor
Subcontractor Location of
Business
CSLB Contractor
License No.

DIR Registration
Number
% of the
Work
N/A
1252
SECTION 00440

LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
33 SECTION 00440

LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
Work to be
done by
Subcontractor
Subcontractor Location of
Business
CSLB Contractor
License No.

DIR Registration
Number
% of the
Work
In addition to submitting this Designation of Subcontractor form with its bid submission, each bidder shall, within 24 hours of the bid submission deadline, provide the City with a list of bid items that correspond to the portion of work listed for each designated subcontractor. Failure to provide this information within the time prescribed may be cause for the City to deem the Bid non-responsive and the City may reject the Bid.

Name of Bidder
Signature
Name
Title
Dated

END OF LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
Elegant Construction Inc
Hazem Almassry
Vice President
02-25-26
N/A
1253
34 SECTION 00450

IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION
SECTION 00450

IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION
MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH BID PROPOSAL IF BID AMOUNT IS $1,000,000 OR MORE (Public Contract Code Section 2200 et seq.)
As required by California Public Contract Code Section 2204, the Contractor certifies subject to penalty for perjury that the option checked below relating to the Contractor's status in regard to the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 (Public Contract Code Section 2200 et seq.) is true and correct:
□ The Contractor is not:
(i) identified on the current list of persons and entities engaging in investment activities in Iran prepared by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) of Public Contract Code Section 2203; or
(ii) a financial institution that extends, for 45 days or more, credit in the amount of $20,000,000 or more to any other person or entity identified on the current list of persons and entities engaging in investment activities in Iran prepared by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) of Public Contract Code Section 2203, if that person or entity uses or will use the credit to provide goods or services in the energy sector in Iran. □ The City has exempted the Contractor from the requirements of the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 after making a public finding that, absent the exemption, the City will be unable to obtain the goods and/or services to be provided pursuant to the Contract. Documentation demonstrating the City’s exemption approval is attached.

Signed:

Titled:

Firm:

Date:

Note: In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 2205, false certification of this form shall be reported to the California Attorney General and may result in civil penalties equal to the greater of $250,000 or twice the Contract amount, termination of the Contract and/or ineligibility to bid on contracts for three years.

END OF IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION
Vice President
Elegant Construction Inc
02-25-26
1254
35 SECTION 00460

PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION

CERTIFICATION
SECTION 00460

PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, all contractors and subcontractors that wish to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or enter into a contract to perform public work must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. See http://www.dir.ca.gov/PublicWorks/PublicWorks.html for additional information.

No bid will be accepted nor any contract entered into without proof of the contractor’s and subcontractors’ current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work.

Bidder hereby certifies that it is aware of the registration requirements set forth in Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 and is currently registered as a contractor with the Department of Industrial Relations.

Name of Bidder:

DIR Registration Number:

Bidder further acknowledges:

1. Bidder shall maintain a current DIR registration for the duration of the project.

2. Bidder shall include the requirements of Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 in its contract with subcontractors and ensure that all subcontractors are registered at the time of bid opening and maintain registration status for the duration of the project.

3. Failure to submit this form or comply with any of the above requirements may result in a finding that the bid is non-responsive.

Name of Bidder
Signature
Name
Title
Dated

END OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION CERTIFICATION Elegant Construction Inc
1000406720
Elegant Construction Inc
Hazem Almassry
Vice President
02-25-26
1255
14 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
SECTION 00400

BID FORM
NAME OF BIDDER:

BASE BID SCHEDULE
Bid
Item
No.

Bid Item Description * Est.

Qty
Unit of
Measure Unit Price Total Item Cost
1 Mobilization/Demobilization 1 LS
2 Clear and Grub 1 LS
3 Excavation and Grading 1 LS
4 Construct Pump Station Below
Grade Structural Items 1 LS
5 Construct Pump Station Above
Grade Structural Items 1 LS
6 Construct Pump Station 16-Inch
Suction Piping 1 LS
7 Construct Pump Station 16-Inch
No-Pump Bypass Piping 1 LS
8 Construct Pump Station 16-Inch
Discharge Piping 1 LS
9 Construct Pump Station 10-Inch
Discharge Piping 1 LS
10 Construct Pump Station Vertical
Turbine Pump and Motor
Assemblies
2 EA
11 Construct Pump Station 12-Inch
Discharge Piping 2 EA
12 Construct Pump Station 6-Inch
Surge Piping and Sump Pump
System
1 LS
US Builders and Consultants Inc.
$256,330 $256,330
$48,490 $48,490
$166,250 $166,250
$415,670 $415,670
$484,950 $484,950
$290,270 $290,270
$207,850 $207,850
$200,910 $200,910
$62,350 $62,350
$214,750 $429,500
$96,990 $193,980
$90,050 $90,050
Attachment 7
1256
SECTION 00400

BID FORM
15 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
Bid
Item
No.

Bid Item Description * Est.

If any of the above discrepancies exist, the City may recalculate the bid price on the basis of the unit price and the bidder agrees to be bound by such recalculation. $35,355 $35,355
$110,850 $110,850
$110,840 $110,840
$110,845 $110,845
$414,230 $$414,230
$415,670 $415,670
$48,490 $48,490
$41,570 $41,570
$62,350 $62,350
1257
SECTION 00400

BID FORM
16 SECTION 00400

Final payment shall be determined by the Engineer from measured quantities of work performed based upon the unit price.

Alternate
Bid Item
No.

Bid Item Description * Est.

Qty
Unit of
Measure Unit Price Total Item Cost
A1
Additional 16-Inch Gate Valves 3 EA
A2
A3
* See Spec Section 01030 Measurement and Payment for description of above bid items.

TOTAL BID PRICE (BASED ON BASE BID SCHEDULE):
$ ________________________________________
Total Base Bid Price in Numbers __________________________________________________________________________ Total Base Bid Price in Written Form In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail. In case of a discrepancy between the electronic bid form in the City’s Planet Bids system 4,296,800
Four Million Two Hundred Ninety Six Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars $28,000 $84,000
1258
SECTION 00400

BID FORM
17 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
(if used) and this completed bid form, the signed hardcopy bid form (or scanned signed form uploaded to the City’s Planet Bids system, shall prevail.

The undersigned acknowledges receipt, understanding and full consideration of the following addenda to the Contract Documents.

Addenda No. _______________________
Addenda No. _______________________
Addenda No. _______________________
Bidder has attached the following:

1. The completed Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation form.

2. The required bid security in the amount of not less than 10% of the Total Bid Price.

3. The fully executed Non-Collusion Declaration form.

4. The completed Contractor Information and Experience form.

5. The completed List of Subcontractors form.

6. The completed Iran Contracting Act Certification form (for bids of $1,000,000 or more).

7. The completed Public Works Contractor Registration Certification form.

Name of Bidder
1067739 12/31/2026 A&B
US Builders and Consultants Inc.

N/A
1259
SECTION 00400

BID FORM
18 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
Signature
Name
Title
Dated

END OF BID FORM
Tamer Awad
Vice President
02 / 26 / 2026
1260
19 SECTION 00400

BID FORM
Section 00405
WORKER’S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION

WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION

I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
(ONE OF THE BOXES BELOW MUST BE CHECKED)
I have and will maintain a certificate of consent from the California Labor Commission to self-insure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this contract.

Carrier____________________________________________________ Policy Number______________________________________________

WARNING: FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL, AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO

State Compensation Insurance Fund
9321459 - 2025
1261
55452.01510\32905704.2
20 Dated: _______________________________ ________________________________ Consultant By: ________________________________ ________________________________ Title ________________________________ Address ________________________________ 02 / 26 / 2026
US Builders and Consultants Inc.

Tamer Awad
Vice President
126 Desert Lotus, Irvine, CA 92618
1262
Tamer Awad
Vice President
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
23 SECTION 00420

NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION
SECTION 00420

NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION
The undersigned declares:

I am the ______________ of _________________, the party making the foregoing bid.

The bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham.

Name of Bidder
Signature
Name
Title
Dated

END OF NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION
02 / 26 / 2026
Irvine California
US Builders and Consultants Inc.

Tamer Awad
Vice President
02 / 26 / 2026
Tamer Awad, Vice President US Builders and Consultants Inc. 1269
1270
24 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
SECTION 00430

1.0 Name of Bidder: ___________________________________________

2.0 Type, if Entity: ___________________________________________

3.0 Bidder Address: ___________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Facsimile Number Telephone Number Email Address_______________________________________
Website Address

4.0 How many years has Bidder’s organization been in business as a Contractor? _______ 5.0 How many years has Bidder’s organization been in business under its present name? ________________________

5.1 Under what other or former names has Bidder’s organization operated?_______________________________________________

6.0 If Bidder’s organization is a corporation, answer the following:

6.1 Date of Incorporation: ________________________________

6.2 State of Incorporation: ________________________________

6.3 President’s/CEO Name: ________________________________

6.4 Vice President’s Name(s): ________________________________

6.5 Secretary’s Name: ________________________________

6.6 Treasurer’s Name: ________________________________

7.0 If an individual or a partnership, answer the following:

US Builders and Consultants Inc.

Corporation
126 Desert Lotus, Irvine, CA 92618
949-203-2116 (714) 317-8402
[email protected]
www.us-builders.com
5 5
N/A
12/18/2020
California
Mohamed Al Mallah
Tamer Awad
1271
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
25 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM

7.1 Date of Organization: ____________________________________

7.2 Name and address of all partners (state whether general or limited partnership): __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 8.0 If other than a corporation or partnership, describe organization and name principals: ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 9.0 List other states in which Bidder’s organization is legally qualified to do business. ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 10.0 What type of work does the Bidder normally perform with its own forces? ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 11.0 Has Bidder ever failed to complete any work awarded to it? If so, note when, where, and why: ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 12.0 Has the Bidder ever been in default, debarred or suspended in any way? If so, note when and why: ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 13.0 Within the last five years, has any officer or partner of Bidder’s organization ever been an officer or partner of another organization when it failed to complete a contract? If so, attach a separate sheet of explanation: ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 14.0 List Trade References (Materials Suppliers, Vendors, Union Representatives, etc.: ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NO
NO
Class A & B work
Renovations, civil works, Storm and Sewer``
NO
Company: White CAP Credit Limit: $2,500 Account Number: 10000702117 Phone: (321) 300-2342 South Bay Foundry Inc. Samantha Machuca Accounting, 895 S. Inland Center Drive San Bernardino, CA. 92408 Jennifer C. Anaya, Senior Advisor, ID License Number 3650226 | NPN 3650226 Pizano’s Contracting, 614 N Caswell Ave, Pomona, CA 91767 1272
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
26 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM

15.0 List Bank References (Bank and Branch Address): ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 16.0 Name of Bonding Company and Name and Address, email address and phone number of Agent: ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ JB Morgan Chase
3973 Irvine Blvd, Irvine, CA, 92602
(714) 731-2471
The Gray Casualty & Surety Company
Jennifer C. Anaya | Senior Advisor (949) 702 3926
2079 N. Warwick Avenue | Meridian, Idaho 83646
1273
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
27 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
B. LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG)
**Duplicate Page if needed for listing additional current projects** Project and
Client Contact
Person and
Phone Number
Description of
Bidder’s Work
Completion Date Cost of
Bidder’s Work
Amounted
Bonded
Riverside County
Transportation Department –
Engineering Field Services
Trai N. Nguyen -
(951) 955-6885
Temecula Valley Wine Country
Archway. Structural steel
archway, concrete footings,
anchor bolts, electrical,
coordination with Western Sign
03 /01/ 2026 $550,000.00 $744,100
Briarwood Lift Station
Rehabilitation Project $571,400.00
Chris Baca,
(310) 502-6335
Mechanical, Electrical,
Motor & Pumps, Asphalt
Pavement, Manhole Coatings,
HDPE Piping
Ongoing
1274
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
28 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
C. LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS
**Duplicate Page if needed for listing additional completed projects** Please include only those projects which are similar enough to demonstrate Bidder’s ability to perform the required Work.

Client Description of
Bidder’s Work
Period of
Performance
Cost of
Bidder’s Work
Contact Name
& Phone
City of Rancho
Cucamonga 06\28\2024 - 08\10\2025 $ 818,107 Romeo David(909) 774-4070 Colton Joint Unified
School District,
Bloomington
07/10/2023 - 06/28/2024 $229,900 Diane Mendez
(909) 580-6586
City of Orange Constructing a New Bin Storage
Structure With Relevant Site
Improvements
10/07/2023 - 04/25/2024 $528,000 Tuan Cao
(714) 288-2492
City of Lake Elsinore
City of San
Bernardino
Site Works, Utilities, Sidewalks,
Interior Rennovation
Site Works, Fencing, Sidewalks,
Interior Rennovation
Concrete, Piping, Trenching
25/11/2024 - 04/21/2025
08/05/2024 - 01/17/202
12/27/2022 - 04/25/2023
$1,633,836
$1,011,932
$819,983
Kevin Tait
(951) 905-8530
Anthony Bendezu
(626) 307-1283
Ziad Mazboudi
(626) 532-2018
Pump Station, Curb Ramps, Curb & Gutter,
Sidewalk, Grading, Retaining Curbs &
Walls, Fencing And Gates & Striping
Demolition, Utilities, Site Paving,
Grading & Earthwork, Playground
Structure, Shade Structure
City of Monterey Park
1275
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
29 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
D. EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE Personnel:

The Bidder shall identify the key personnel to be assigned to this project in a management, construction supervision or engineering capacity.

1. List each person’s job title, name and percent of time to be allocated to this project:

2. Summarize each person’s specialized education:

3. List each person’s years of construction experience relevant to the project:

4. Summarize such experience:

Mohammad Almallah, Civil Engineer
Tamer Awad, CPA
Mohammad Almallah, 20 years
Tamer Awad, 5 Years in construction
Mohamed Almallah, Site superintendent - Time allocation 60% On-Site supervision, quality control, safety management and coordination of field crews Civil Construction & QA/QC - Public & infrastructure projects Terms and contractor management - Code and standard compliance 1276
SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
30 SECTION 00430

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
Additional Bidder’s Statements:

E. VERIFICATION AND EXECUTION
These Bid Forms shall be executed only by a duly authorized official of the Bidder:

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing information is true and correct:

Name of Bidder
Signature
Name
Title
Dated

END OF CONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE FORM
US Builders and Consultants Inc.

Tamer Awad
Vice President
02 / 26 / 2026
1277
55452.01510\32905704.2 31 SECTION 00440 LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM SECTION 00440 LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM In compliance with the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act of the Public Contract Code of the State of California, each bidder shall set forth below: (a) the name and the location of the place of business, (b) the California contractor license number and DIR registration number, and (c) the portion of the work which will be done by each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction of the work in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent (1/2%) of the Contractor’s Total Bid Price. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the work involves streets and highways, then the Contractor shall list each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to Contractor in or about the work in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent (1/2%) of the Contractor’s Total Bid Price or $10,000, whichever is greater. No additional time shall be granted to provide the below requested information. If no subcontractor is specified, for a portion of the work, or if more than one subcontractor is specified for the same portion of Work, then the Contractor shall be deemed to have agreed that it is fully qualified to perform that Work, and that it shall perform that portion itself. The Prime Contractor is required to complete at least 50% of the contract value with its own forces. Work to be done by Subcontractor Subcontractor Location of Business CSLB Contractor License No. DIR Registration Number % of the Work Striping Interstate Striping, Inc. 9784 Poplar Ave Fontana, CA 92335 1087140 1000866044 Asphalt Pavement Hardy & Harper Inc 32 Rancho Circle Lake Forest CA 92630 215952 1000000076 Coating Murphy Industrial Coatings Inc 310594 1000005885 2704 Gundry Avenue Signal Hill CA 90755 Electrical NEXRO Energy Inc. 1407 Peckham Street, Suite 16, Fullerton, CA 92833 1137110 2000015262 0.91% 1.34% 2.51% 26.34% Bypass Rain For Rent P O BOX 2248 BAKERSFIELD, 904992 CA 93303 1000007030 1.15% 1278
SECTION 00440 LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM 32 SECTION 00440 LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM Work to be done by Subcontractor Subcontractor Location of Business CSLB Contractor License No. DIR Registration Number % of the Work 1279
SECTION 00440 LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM 33 SECTION 00440 LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM Work to be done by Subcontractor Subcontractor Location of Business CSLB Contractor License No. DIR Registration Number % of the Work In addition to submitting this Designation of Subcontractor form with its bid submission, each bidder shall, within 24 hours of the bid submission deadline, provide the City with a list of bid items that correspond to the portion of work listed for each designated subcontractor. Failure to provide this information within the time prescribed may be cause for the City to deem the Bid non-responsive and the City may reject the Bid. Name of Bidder Signature Name Title Dated END OF LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM US Builders & Consultants Inc Tamer Awad Vice President 02/26/2026 1280
34 SECTION 00450

IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION
SECTION 00450

The Contractor is not:
(i) identified on the current list of persons and entities engaging in investment activities in Iran prepared by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) of Public Contract Code Section 2203; or
(ii) a financial institution that extends, for 45 days or more, credit in the amount of $20,000,000 or more to any other person or entity identified on the current list of persons and entities engaging in investment activities in Iran prepared by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) of Public Contract Code Section 2203, if that person or entity uses or will use the credit to provide goods or services in the energy sector in Iran.

The City has exempted the Contractor from the requirements of the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 after making a public finding that, absent the exemption, the City will be unable to obtain the goods and/or services to be provided pursuant to the Contract. Documentation demonstrating the City’s exemption approval is attached.

Signed:

Titled:

Firm:

Date:

END OF IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION
Vice President
US Builders and Consultants Inc.
02 / 26 / 2026
1281
35 SECTION 00460

PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION

CERTIFICATION
SECTION 00460

Name of Bidder:

DIR Registration Number:

Bidder further acknowledges:

1. Bidder shall maintain a current DIR registration for the duration of the project.

3. Failure to submit this form or comply with any of the above requirements may result in a finding that the bid is non-responsive.

Name of Bidder
Signature
Name
Title
Dated

END OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION CERTIFICATION US Builders and Consultants Inc.
1000756487
US Builders and Consultants Inc.

Tamer Awad
Vice President
02 / 26 / 2026
1282
BA20252132193
Entity Details
Corporation Name ELEGANT CONSTRUCTION INC
Entity No. 4229553
Formed In CALIFORNIA
Street Address of Principal Office of Corporation
Principal Address 15375 BARRANCA PARKWAY
J-103
IRVINE, CA 92618
Mailing Address of Corporation
Mailing Address 15375 BARRANCA PARKWAY
J-103
IRVINE, CA 92618
Attention Hazem Almassry
Street Address of California Office of Corporation
Street Address of California Office 15375 BARRANCA PARKWAY J-103
IRVINE, CA 92618
Officers
Officer Name Officer Address Position(s)
Hazem Almassry 16306 SPECTRUM
IRVINE, CA 92618
Secretary
Samer Alhakim 127 Carrotwood
Irvine, CA 92618
Chief Executive Officer
+ Hazem Almassry 16306 SPECTRUM
IRVINE, CA 92618
Chief Financial Officer
Additional Officers
Officer Name Officer Address Position Stated Position
None Entered
Directors
The number of vacancies on Board of Directors is: 0
Director Name Director Address
Hazem Almassry 16306 SPECTRUM
IRVINE, CA 92618
Samer Al Hakim 188 TECHNOLOGY DR

SUITE N
IRVINE, CA 92618
Agent for Service of Process
Agent Name Samer Alhakim
Agent Address 127 CARROTWOOD
IRVINE, CA 92618

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Office of the Secretary of State

STATEMENT OF INFORMATION

CORPORATION
California Secretary of State
1500 11th Street
Sacramento, California 95814
(916) 657-5448
B4131-8609 10/30/2025 1:20 PM Received by California Secretary of State

Page 1 of 2 ends

San Clemente City CouncilMay 19, 2026

San Clemente City Council
May 19, 2026