City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule by Department
General Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
Taxes
Licenses and permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Use of money and property
Fines and forfeitures
Miscellaneous
$ 38,883,688 $ 38,883,688 $ 38,883,688 $ -
22,526,438
934,220
88,164
1,266,210
524,828
343,600
477,000
352,000
15,000
22,526,438
934,220
462,640
1,266,210
524,828
343,600
477,000
352,000
15,000
23,303,856
1,628,251
216,045
1,408,240
778,307
424,025
1,231,774
352,000
777,418
694,031
(246,595)
142,030
253,479
80,425
754,774
-
410,388
499,211
3,365,161
Transfers in
Proceeds from sale of fixed asset
Lease acquisition
425,388
499,211
69,150,785
- -
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriation (Outflow):
General government
General government
City council
City manager/City clerk
Administrative services
City attorney
65,411,148 65,785,624
94,420
715,818
1,559,245
650,000
4,915,980
19,000
94,420
824,918
1,455,036
931,984
4,913,280
29,000
72,949
843,734
1,273,827
578,078
4,535,317
5,250
21,471
(18,816)
181,209
353,906
377,963
23,750
General services
Economic development
Public safety
Law enforcement 7,774,636
7,500
7,800,709
7,500
127,541
85,000
7,578,496
3,512
222,213
3,988
78,582
62,256
Risk management/law enforcement
Emergency services
General services
39,741
22,000
48,959
22,744
Community development
Community development
Parks and recreation
Facilities
Civic center
Senior center/community building
Park maintenance
Parkways and trees
Recreation
Swim and racquet club
Public works
1,485,703 2,043,468 2,055,012 (11,544)
691,243
232,582
245,938
372,145
612,066
1,414,543
1,226,458
656,909
300,582
267,088
361,645
608,066
1,405,543
1,368,143
557,652
269,460
234,390
339,142
591,639
1,292,387
895,072
99,257
31,122
32,698
22,503
16,427
113,156
473,071
Public works 1,068,416
1,211,700
403,525
493,367
325,351
1,061,916
1,306,299
433,025
493,367
931,912
1,009,758
998,138
344,115
400,047
677,253
52,158
308,161
88,910
93,320
254,659
Street maintenance
Vehicle/yard maintenance
Traffic control
Capital outlay
Debt service:
Principal retirement
Transfers out
- - 195,524
2,299,374
27,121,829
(195,524)
-
2,684,896
2,236,459
27,817,836
2,299,374
Total Charges to Appropriations 29,806,725
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 37,593,312 $ 35,978,899 $ 42,028,956 $ 6,050,057 -65- Page 459 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Golf Course Maintenance and Operation
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
Actual
Amounts
(6,837,629)
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ (6,837,629) $ (6,837,629) $ $ -
Use of money and property
Miscellaneous
632,000
307,000
632,000
307,000
779,739
374,096
147,739
67,096
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriation (Outflow):
Parks and recreation
(5,898,629) (5,898,629) (5,683,794) 214,835
297,000 297,000 188,152 108,848
Debt service:
Interest and fiscal charges
Total Charges to Appropriations
335,000
632,000
335,000
632,000
158,933
347,085
176,067
284,915
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ (6,530,629) $ (6,530,629) $ (6,030,879) $ 499,750 -66- Page 460 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Housing Authority
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original
$ 5,675,830
Final
$ 5,675,830
Amounts
5,675,830
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ $ -
Use of money and property
Miscellaneous
1,820,000
-
1,820,000
487,918
1,990,809
487,918
170,809
-
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriation (Outflow):
Community development
Debt service:
7,495,830 7,983,748 8,154,557 170,809
2,064,797 2,064,797 1,393,078 671,719
Principal retirement
Interest and fiscal charges
Total Charges to Appropriations
457,400
30,518
2,552,715
457,400
30,518
2,552,715
457,400
30,518
1,880,996
-
-
671,719
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 4,943,115 $ 5,431,033 $ 6,273,561 $ 842,528 -67- Page 461 – 798
City of San Dimas
Notes to Required Supplementary Information
June 30, 2023
1) BUDGET PROCEDURES
a. Budgetary Data
General Budget Policies
The City Council approves each year's budget submitted by the City manager prior to the beginning of the new fiscal year. Public hearings are conducted prior to its adoption by the Council. Intradepartmental budget changes are approved by the City manager. In most cases, expenditures may not exceed appropriations at the function level. At fiscal year-end all unencumbered operating budget appropriations lapse. During the year several supplementary appropriations were necessary.
Budget Basis of Accounting
Budgets for governmental funds are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Budgets
b. Excess of Expenditures over Appropriations are as follows:
Fund Appropriations Expenditures Excess
$ (6,863)
Non-major Governmental Funds:
Open Space Maintenance District $ 59,627 $ 66,490
-68- Page 462 – 798
City of San Dimas
Miscellaneous Rate Plan
Schedule of Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability As of June 30, for the Last Ten Fiscal Years*
Employer's
Proportionate
Share of the
Collective Net
Pension Liability
as a
Percentage of
the Employer's
Covered Payroll Pension Liability
Pension Plan
Fiduciary Net
Position as a
Percentage of
the Total
Employer's
Proportionate
Share of the
Collective Net
Pension Liability
Employer's
Proportion of the
Collective Net Employer's
Measurement Date Pension Liability Covered Payroll 1
6/30/2014
6/30/2015
6/30/2016
6/30/2017
6/30/2018
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
6/30/2021
6/30/2022
0.12931%
0.11920%
0.12074%
0.11863%
0.11494%
0.11742%
0.11924%
0.12587%
0.11779%
$ 8,046,361
8,182,059
10,447,866
11,764,435
11,076,275
12,031,846
12,974,156
6,807,411
15,541,335
$ 4,818,949
5,084,153
5,137,893
5,404,633
5,646,432
5,928,291
5,973,410
5,740,092
6,218,229
166.97%
160.93%
203.35%
217.67%
196.16%
202.96%
217.20%
118.59%
249.93%
79.82%
78.40%
74.06%
73.31%
75.26%
75.26%
76.40%
88.30%
74.21%
1 Proportion of the net pension liability represents the plan's proportion of PERF C, which includes both the Miscellaneous and Safety Risk Pools excluding the 1959 Survivors Risk Pool. * Measurement date 6/30/2014 (fiscal year 2015) was the first year of implementation. Additional years will be presented as information becomes available.
-69- Page 463 – 798
City of San Dimas
Miscellaneous Rate Plan
Schedule of Plan Contributions
As of June 30, for the Last Ten Fiscal Years (1)
Contributions
in Relation to
Contributions
as a
Actuarially
Determined
Contribution
the Actuarially
Determined
Contribution
Contribution
Deficiency
(Excess)
Employer's
Covered
Payroll
Percentage
of Covered
Fiscal Year Payroll
6/30/2015
6/30/2016
6/30/2017
6/30/2018
6/30/2019
6/30/2020
6/30/2021
6/30/2022
6/30/2023
$ 709,416
971,751
1,072,252
915,269
1,069,480
1,638,660
1,368,607
1,549,249
1,845,344
$ (709,416)
(1,071,751)
(1,255,961)
(1,095,269)
(1,269,480)
(1,438,660)
(1,447,098)
(1,549,249)
(1,845,344)
$ -
(100,000)
(183,709)
(180,000)
(200,000)
200,000
(78,491)
-
$ 5,084,153
5,137,893
5,404,633
5,646,432
5,928,291
5,973,410
5,740,092
6,218,229
6,892,393
13.95%
20.86%
23.24%
19.40%
21.41%
24.08%
25.21%
24.91%
- 26.77%
(1) Measurement date 6/30/2014 (fiscal year 2015) was the first year of implementation. Additional years will be presented as information becomes available
Notes to Schedule:
Changes in Benefit Terms: There were no changes to benefit terms that applied to all members of the Public Agency Pool. Additionally, the figures above do not include any liability impact that may have resulted from Golden Handshakes that occurred after the June 30, 2021 valuation date, unless the liability impact is deemed to be material to the Public Agency Pool.
Changes in Assumptions: Effective with the June 30, 2021 valuation date (2022 measurement date), the accounting discount rate was reduced from 7.15% to 6.90%. In determining the long-term expected rate of return, CalPERS took into account long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Projected returns for all asset classes are estimated, combined with risk estimates, and are used to project compound (geometric) returns over the long term. The discount rate used to discount liabilities was informed by the long-term projected portfolio return. In addition, demographic assumptions and the inflation rate assumption were changed in accordance with the 2021 CalPERS Experience Study and Review of Actuarial Assumptions. There were no assumption changes for 2021. For 2020, the Plan adopted a new amortization policy effective with the 2019 actuarial valuation. The new amortization policy shortens the period over which actuarial gains and losses are amortized from 30 years to 20 years with the payments computed as a level dollar amount. In addition, the new policy does not utilize a five-year ramp-up and ramp-down on UAL bases attributable to assumption changes and non-investment gains/losses. The new policy also does not utilize a five-year ramp-down on investment gains/losses. These changes apply only to new UAL bases established on or after June 30, 2019. There were no changes in assumptions in 2019. In 2018, demographic assumptions and inflation rate were changed in accordance to the CalPERS Experience Study and Review of Actuarial Assumptions December 2017. There were no changes in the discount rate in 2019. In 2017, the accounting discount rate was reduced from 7.65 percent to 7.15 percent. In 2016, there were no changes in the discount rate. In 2015, amounts reported reflect an adjustment of the discount rate from 7.5 percent (net of administrative expense) to 7.65 percent (without a reduction for pension plan administrative expense). In 2014, amounts reported were based on the 7.5 percent discount rate. -70- Page 464 – 798
City of San Dimas
Schedule of Changes in the Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios As of June 30, for the Last Ten Fiscal Years (1)
2018
78,902
61,911
-
2019
81,585
64,660
-
(28,380)
(64,171)
53,694
1,852,264
2020
82,358
68,360
145,032
106,411
(70,361)
331,800
1,905,958
2021 2022 2023
Total OPEB Liability
Service cost
Interest on the total OPEB liability
Actual and expected experience difference
Changes in assumptions
$ $ $ $ 112,307
72,923
-
182,971
(70,117)
298,084
2,237,758
$ 115,676
67,977
227,573
82,874
(51,010)
443,090
2,535,842
$ 183,685
64,925
(4,266)
(539,399)
(125,754)
(420,809)
2,978,932
-
Benefit payments (2) (61,115)
79,698
1,772,566
Net change in total OPEB liability
Total OPEB liability - beginning
Total OPEB liability - ending (a) $ 1,852,264 $ 1,905,958 $ 2,237,758 $ 2,535,842 $2,978,932 $2,558,123 Total OPEB Liability/(Assets) - ending (a) - (b) $ 1,852,264 $ 1,905,958 $ 2,237,758 $ 2,535,842 $2,978,932 $2,558,123 Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total OPEB liability Covered-employee payroll
0.00%
$ 5,520,000
33.56%
0.00%
$ 5,970,048
31.93%
0.00%
$ 5,971,482
37.47%
0.00%
$ 6,128,500
41.38%
0.00%
$6,297,034
47.31%
0.00%
$6,892,393
Total OPEB liability as a percentage of covered-employee payroll 37.12% (1) Historical information is required only for the measurement periods for which GASB 75 is applicable. Fiscal Year 2018 was the first year of implementation.
Future years' information will be displayed up to 10 years as information becomes available. (2) Includes implied subsidy.
Notes to Schedule: The City does not have assets accumulated in a trust that meet the criteria of GASB 75 to pay related benefits. Benefits are not based on a measure of pay, therefore covered-employee payroll is used.
Changes in assumptions: The discount rate was changed from 2.16% to 3.54% for the measurement period ended June 30, 2022. The salary is assumed to
2.75% higher than salary as of 6/30/21 for the measurement period ended June 30, 2022. -71- Page 465 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
June 30, 2023
Special Revenue Funds
Sewer
Expansion
City Wide
Lighting District
Landscape
Gas Tax Parcel Tax
1,602,530
ASSETS
Pooled cash and investments
Receivables:
Accounts
Taxes
Notes and loans
Grants
$ $ 1,379,208 $ 4,395,192 $ 224,804
- 9,005
250
-
-
-
81,032
-
-
76,834 17,746
-
-
-
291,168 -
Total Assets $ 1,679,364 $ 1,388,463 $ 4,767,392 $ 242,550
LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 204,980 $ 6,640 $ 157,019 $ 121,697
Deposits payable
Unearned revenues
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Liabilities 204,980 6,640 157,019 121,697
Deferred Inflows of Resources:
Unavailable revenues - 9,005 291,168 -
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources - 9,005 291,168 -
Fund Balances:
Restricted for:
Public safety -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Parks and recreation -
Public works
Debt service
1,474,384 4,319,205 120,853
-
-
-
-
-
Housing -
Committed to:
Parks and recreation
Public works
-
-
- -
-
-
1,372,818 -
Total Fund Balances 1,474,384 1,372,818
1,388,463
4,319,205 120,853
Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources,
and Fund Balances $ 1,679,364 $ $ 4,767,392 $ 242,550
-72- Page 466 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
June 30, 2023 (Continued)
Special Revenue Funds
Property
Infrastructure
Replacement
Development Tax
Community Wide
North &
West Park Dist. East Park Dist.
ASSETS
Pooled cash and investments
Receivables:
Accounts
Taxes
Notes and loans
Grants
$ 2,550,837 $ 61,162 $ 515,861 $ 317,475
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
79,729 116,022 -
Total Assets $ 2,630,566 $ 177,184 $ 515,861 $ 317,475
LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Deposits payable
Unearned revenues
$ 76,051
-
48,950
$ 17,875 $ 4,010
-
-
$ 19,295
-
-
-
-
Total Liabilities 125,001 17,875 4,010 19,295
Deferred Inflows of Resources:
Unavailable revenues 25,479 51,800 - -
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 25,479 51,800 - -
Fund Balances:
Restricted for:
Public safety -
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Parks and recreation
Public works
Debt service
511,851 298,180
2,480,086 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Housing -
Committed to:
Parks and recreation
Public works
-
-
107,509
-
-
-
-
-
Total Fund Balances 2,480,086 107,509 511,851 298,180
Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources,
and Fund Balances $ 2,630,566 $ 177,184 $ 515,861 $ 317,475 -73- Page 467 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
June 30, 2023
Special Revenue Funds
Housing Authority Housing &
Community
Development
Citizen's
Option for
Public Safety
(Housing
South Park Dist. Successor)
ASSETS
Pooled cash and investments
Receivables:
Accounts
Taxes
Notes and loans
Grants
$ 45,786 $ 2,596,542 $ 36,892 $ 303,106
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
229,612
6,043
Total Assets $ 45,786 $ 2,596,542 $ 272,547 $ 303,106
LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 15,995 $ 169,692 $ 42,935 $ 85,810
Deposits payable
Unearned revenues
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Liabilities 15,995 169,692 42,935 85,810
Deferred Inflows of Resources:
Unavailable revenues - - 229,612 -
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources - - 229,612 -
Fund Balances:
Restricted for:
Public safety -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
217,296
Parks and recreation
Public works
Debt service
-
-
-
Housing 2,426,850 -
Committed to:
Parks and recreation
Public works
- -
-
-
-
-
29,791 -
Total Fund Balances 29,791
45,786
2,426,850 - 217,296
Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources,
and Fund Balances $ $ 2,596,542 $ 272,547 $ 303,106
-74- Page 468 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
June 30, 2023 (Continued)
Special Revenue Funds
Air Quality
Management
District
Open Space
Maintenance
District
Proposition A
Local Transit
Transportation
Proposition C
ASSETS
Pooled cash and investments
Receivables:
Accounts
Taxes
Notes and loans
Grants
$ 323,838 $ 6,089,980 $ 1,626,552 $ 13,327
11,457 163 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192
-
-
Total Assets $ 335,295 $ 6,090,143 $ 1,626,552 $ 13,519
LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Deposits payable
Unearned revenues
$ -
-
-
$ 11,244 $ 4,076
-
-
$ 7,253
-
-
11 -
Total Liabilities - 11,255 4,076 7,253
Deferred Inflows of Resources:
Unavailable revenues - - - -
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources - - - -
Fund Balances:
Restricted for:
Public safety -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Parks and recreation
Public works
Debt service
335,295 6,078,888 1,622,476
-
-
-
-
-
Housing -
Committed to:
Parks and recreation
Public works
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,266
-
Total Fund Balances 335,295 6,078,888 1,622,476 6,266
Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources,
and Fund Balances $ 335,295 $ 6,090,143 $ 1,626,552 $ 13,519 -75- Page 469 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
June 30, 2023
Special Revenue Funds
Measure R
Transit
Measure M
Transit
Road Maint.
Rehab Act
Measure W
Storm Water
ASSETS
Pooled cash and investments
Receivables:
Accounts
Taxes
Notes and loans
Grants
$ 1,429,667 $ 2,337,829 $ 1,379,306 $ 2,180,838
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
136,647 675,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Assets $ 1,429,667 $ 2,337,829 $ 1,515,953 $ 2,855,838
LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Deposits payable
Unearned revenues
$ 2,958
-
-
$ 52,119 $ 46,718 $ 6,019
-
1,514,234
-
-
-
-
Total Liabilities 2,958 52,119 46,718 1,520,253
Deferred Inflows of Resources:
Unavailable revenues - - - -
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources - - - -
Fund Balances:
Restricted for:
Public safety - - - -
Parks and recreation
Public works
- - - -
1,426,709 2,285,710 1,469,235 1,335,585
Debt service
Housing
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Committed to:
Parks and recreation
Public works
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Fund Balances 1,426,709 2,285,710 1,469,235 1,335,585 Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources,
and Fund Balances $ 1,429,667 $ 2,337,829 $ 1,515,953 $ 2,855,838 -76- Page 470 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
June 30, 2023 (Concluded)
Special Revenue
Fund
Capital
Projects Fund
Civic
Debt Service
Funds
Total Other
Governmental
Funds
Center
Expansion
Assessment
ARPA District 96-1
ASSETS
Pooled cash and investments
Receivables:
Accounts
Taxes
Notes and loans
Grants
$ 4,182,943 $ - $ 236 $ 33,593,911
12,964 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
845,236
176,054
229,612
492,962
-
-
-
Total Assets $ 4,195,907 $ - $ 236 $ 35,337,775
LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Deposits payable
Unearned revenues
$ 161,629 $ -
-
-
$ -
-
-
$ 1,214,015
11 1,563,184
-
-
Total Liabilities 161,629 - - 2,777,210
Deferred Inflows of Resources:
Unavailable revenues - - - 607,064
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources - - - 607,064
Fund Balances:
Restricted for:
Public safety -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
217,296
810,031
26,982,704
236
Parks and recreation
Public works
Debt service
4,034,278
-
-
236
Housing - 2,426,850
Committed to:
Parks and recreation
Public works
-
-
-
-
-
-
113,775
1,402,609
Total Fund Balances 4,034,278 - 236 31,953,501
35,337,775
Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources,
and Fund Balances $ 4,195,907 $ - $ 236 $
-77- Page 471 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Special Revenue Funds
Sewer
Expansion
City Wide
Lighting District
Landscape
Gas Tax Parcel Tax
REVENUES
Taxes $ - $ 7,692 $ 1,627,026 $ 986,008
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Use of money and property
Miscellaneous
879,740 - 45,044 25,109
-
36,772
-
100,656 -
- -
-
-
14,542 -
Total Revenues 916,512 108,348 1,686,612 1,011,117
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government
Public safety
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Community development
Parks and recreation
Public works
- - - -
1,072,660
22,913
-
-
780,934
-
-
89,582
-
-
1,124,064
Capital outlay -
Debt service:
Principal retirement
Interest and fiscal charges
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Expenditures 780,934 89,582 1,124,064 1,095,573
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues
Over (Under) Expenditures 135,578 18,766 562,548 (84,456)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in - -
-
-
- 91,000
Transfers out
Proceeds from sale of capital asset
(225,000)
-
(125,000)
-
-
-
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Net Change in Fund Balances
(225,000)
(89,422)
- (125,000)
437,548
91,000
18,766 6,544
Fund Balances (Deficit), Beginning of Year
Fund Balances, End of Year
1,563,806
1,474,384
1,354,052
1,372,818
3,881,657
4,319,205
114,309
$ $ $ $ 120,853
-78- Page 472 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023 (Continued)
Special Revenue Funds
Property
Infrastructure
Replacement
Development Tax
Community Wide
North &
West Park District East Park District
REVENUES
Taxes $ - $ 7,944
64,223
$ - $ -
-
-
-
-
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Use of money and property
Miscellaneous
54,250 134,830
-
387,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Revenues 441,250 72,167 134,830 -
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government
Public safety
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Community development
Parks and recreation
Public works
-
-
-
40,925
-
- -
45,232 -
19,295
-
404,587
244,446
-
Capital outlay 51,780 -
Debt service:
Principal retirement
Interest and fiscal charges
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Expenditures 649,033 92,705 45,232 19,295
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues
Over (Under) Expenditures (207,783) (20,538) 89,598 (19,295)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in 892,476 -
-
-
298,250 63,791
Transfers out
Proceeds from sale of capital asset
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Net Change in Fund Balances
892,476
684,693
- 298,250
387,848
124,003
511,851
63,791
(20,538) 44,496
128,047
107,509
Fund Balances (Deficit), Beginning of Year
Fund Balances, End of Year
1,795,393
2,480,086
253,684
$ $ $ $ 298,180
-79- Page 473 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Special Revenue Funds
Housing Authority
(Housing
Successor)
Housing &
Community
Development
Citizen's
Option for
South Park District Public Safety
REVENUES
Taxes $ -
-
-
-
-
$ -
-
$ - $ -
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Use of money and property
Miscellaneous
156,115 165,271
-
181,446
-
-
-
-
-
6,857
-
Total Revenues - 181,446 156,115 172,128
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government
Public safety
Community development
Parks and recreation
Public works
Capital outlay
Debt service:
Principal retirement
Interest and fiscal charges
-
-
-
-
-
156,115 -
-
-
-
-
-
163,817
1,317,698 -
-
-
-
15,995 -
-
-
121,888
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Expenditures 15,995 1,439,586 156,115 163,817
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues
Over (Under) Expenditures (15,995) (1,258,140) - 8,311
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in -
-
-
234,527 -
-
-
-
-
-
Transfers out
Proceeds from sale of capital asset
-
-
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Net Change in Fund Balances
- 234,527
(1,023,613)
3,450,463
2,426,850
-
-
-
-
-
(15,995)
45,786
29,791
8,311
Fund Balances (Deficit), Beginning of Year
Fund Balances (Deficit), End of Year
208,985
$ $ $ $ 217,296
-80- Page 474 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023 (Continued)
Special Revenue Funds
Air Quality
Management
District
Open Space
Maintenance
District
Proposition A
Local Transit
Transportation
Proposition C
REVENUES
Taxes $ - $ 893,758 $ 741,347 $ 45,868
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Use of money and property
Miscellaneous
56,530 -
-
- -
-
-
-
-
7,289
-
-
65,094
-
65,392
2,218
Total Revenues 63,819 961,368 806,441 45,868
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government
Public safety
- 102,400 -
-
-
26,091 - -
Community development
Parks and recreation
Public works
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
453,080
-
66,490
37,470
1,939,535
-
Capital outlay -
Debt service:
Principal retirement
Interest and fiscal charges
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Expenditures 26,091 555,480 1,977,005 66,490
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues
Over (Under) Expenditures 37,728 405,888 (1,170,564) (20,622)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in - -
-
-
-
-
28,000
Transfers out
Proceeds from sale of capital asset
(2,000)
-
-
4,044,551 -
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Net Change in Fund Balances
(2,000)
35,728
4,044,551
4,450,439
1,628,449
6,078,888
- 28,000
(1,170,564) 7,378
2,793,040
1,622,476
Fund Balances (Deficit), Beginning of Year
Fund Balances, End of Year
299,567
335,295
(1,112)
$ $ $ $ 6,266
-81- Page 475 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Special Revenue Funds
Measure R
Transit
Measure M
Transit
Road Maint.
Rehab Act
Measure W
Storm Water
REVENUES
Taxes $ 555,850 $ 628,785 $ 779,818 $ 597,016
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Use of money and property
Miscellaneous
- - - 60,766
-
38,174
-
-
52,149
-
-
26,762
-
-
45,473
-
Total Revenues 594,024 680,934 806,580 703,255
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government
Public safety
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Community development
Parks and recreation
Public works
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
764,529
-
-
239,477
-
478,444
Capital outlay 1,053,202 13,279
Debt service:
Principal retirement
Interest and fiscal charges
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Expenditures 1,053,202 491,723 764,529 239,477
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues
Over (Under) Expenditures (459,178) 189,211 42,051 463,778
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Transfers out
Proceeds from sale of capital asset
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Net Change in Fund Balances
- - - -
(459,178)
1,885,887
1,426,709
189,211
2,096,499
2,285,710
42,051 463,778
871,807
1,335,585
Fund Balances (Deficit), Beginning of Year
Fund Balances, End of Year
1,427,184
$ $ $ 1,469,235 $
-82- Page 476 – 798
City of San Dimas
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023 (Concluded)
Special Revenue
Fund
Capital
Projects Fund
Civic
Debt Service
Funds
Total Other
Governmental
Funds
Center
Expansion
Assessment
ARPA District 96-1
REVENUES
Taxes $ - $ -
-
-
-
-
$ -
-
-
-
-
$ 6,871,112
5,663,307
100,656
912,408
16,760
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Use of money and property
Miscellaneous
4,021,429
-
-
-
Total Revenues 4,021,429 - - 13,564,243
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government
Public safety
Community development
Parks and recreation
Public works
675,705
596,573
201,498
475,591
88,894
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
934,220
786,481
1,519,196
1,716,893
4,625,157
Capital outlay 3,302,242
Debt service:
Principal retirement
Interest and fiscal charges
-
-
669,000
22,330
-
-
669,000
22,330
Total Expenditures 2,038,261 691,330 - 13,575,519
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues
Over (Under) Expenditures 1,983,168 (691,330) - (11,276)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in -
-
-
691,330 -
-
-
2,299,374
(352,000)
4,044,551
Transfers out
Proceeds from sale of capital asset
-
-
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Net Change in Fund Balances
- 691,330 - 5,991,925
5,980,649
25,972,852
31,953,501
1,983,168
2,051,110
4,034,278
-
-
-
-
Fund Balances (Deficit), Beginning of Year
Fund Balances, End of Year
236
$ $ $ 236 $
-83- Page 477 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Gas Tax
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original
$ 1,563,806
Final
$ 1,563,806
Amounts
1,563,806
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ $ -
Intergovernmental 994,000
10,000
2,567,806
994,000
10,000
2,567,806
879,740
36,772
2,480,318
(114,260)
26,772
(87,488)
Use of money and property
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Public works 641,175
225,000
866,175
2,097,072
225,000
2,322,072
780,934
225,000
1,005,934
1,316,138
-
1,316,138
Transfers out
Total Charges to Appropriations
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 1,701,631 $ 245,734 $ 1,474,384 $ 1,228,650 -84- Page 478 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Sewer Expansion
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original
$ 1,354,052
Final
$ 1,354,052
Amounts
1,354,052
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ $ -
Taxes
Charges for services
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Public works
7,835
53,000
1,414,887
7,835
53,000
1,414,887
7,692
100,656
1,462,400
(143)
47,656
47,513
248,000 282,000 89,582 192,418
Total Charges to Appropriations 248,000 282,000 89,582 192,418 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 1,166,887 $ 1,132,887 $ 1,372,818 $ 239,931 -85- Page 479 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
City Wide Lighting District
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
Taxes
Intergovernmental
Miscellaneous
$ 3,881,657 $ 3,881,657 $ 3,881,657 $ -
1,548,640 1,548,640
838,499
-
1,627,026
45,044
78,386
(793,455)
14,542
-
- 14,542
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Public works
Capital outlay
Transfers out
5,430,297 6,268,796 5,568,269 (700,527)
1,825,780
-
125,000
1,950,780
3,019,893
460,000
125,000
1,124,064
-
125,000
1,249,064
1,895,829
460,000
-
Total Charges to Appropriations 3,604,893 2,355,829
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 3,479,517 $ 2,663,903 $ 4,319,205 $ 1,655,302 -86- Page 480 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Landscape Parcel Tax
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
Actual
Amounts
114,309
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
Taxes
Intergovernmental
Transfers in
$ 114,309 $ 114,309 $ $ -
900,000
35,000
86,820
900,000
35,000
91,000
986,008
25,109
91,000
86,008
(9,891)
-
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Parks and recreation
1,136,129 1,140,309 1,216,426 76,117
1,113,160
20,000
1,133,160
1,117,835
20,000
1,137,835
1,072,660
22,913
1,095,573
45,175
(2,913)
42,262
Public works
Total Charges to Appropriations
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 2,969 $ 2,474 $ 120,853 $ 118,379 -87- Page 481 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Infrastructure Replacement
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original
$ 1,795,393
Final
$ 1,795,393
Amounts
1,795,393
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
Intergovernmental
Use of money and property
Miscellaneous
$ $ -
25,000
504,000
1,829,000
892,476
25,000
504,000
1,829,000
892,476
54,250
387,000
-
892,476
3,129,119
29,250
(117,000)
(1,829,000)
Transfers in -
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Public works
5,045,869 5,045,869 (1,916,750)
1,079,750
2,512,428
3,641,128
1,407,224
3,384,969
4,841,143
404,587
244,446
649,033
1,002,637
3,140,523
4,192,110
Capital outlay
Total Charges to Appropriations
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 1,404,741 $ 204,726 $ 2,480,086 $ 2,275,360 -88- Page 482 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Property Development Tax – Community Wide
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
Actual
Amounts
128,047
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ 128,047 $ 128,047 $ $ -
Taxes
Intergovernmental
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Parks and recreation
-
-
- 7,944
64,223
200,214
7,944
(208,899)
(200,955)
273,122
128,047 401,169
-
-
-
50,600
196,192
246,792
40,925
51,780
92,705
9,675
144,412
154,087
Capital outlay
Total Charges to Appropriations
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 128,047 $ 154,377 $ 107,509 $ (46,868) -89- Page 483 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
North & West Park District
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
124,003
Actual
Amounts
124,003
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ $ 124,003 $ $ -
Intergovernmental
Miscellaneous
Transfers in
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Parks and recreation
839,391
-
255,107
1,218,501
989,391
33,254
298,250
1,444,898
134,830
-
298,250
557,083
(854,561)
(33,254)
-
(887,815)
1,351,840
1,351,840
1,444,897
1,444,897
45,232
45,232
1,399,665
Total Charges to Appropriations 1,399,665
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ (133,339) $ 1 $ 511,851 $ 511,850 -90- Page 484 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
East Park District
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
Actual
Amounts
253,684
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ 253,684 $ 253,684 $ $ -
Transfers in 63,791 63,791 63,791 -
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Parks and recreation
317,475 317,475 317,475 -
-
68,000
68,000.00
179,000
119,800
298,800
-
19,295
19,295
179,000
100,505
279,505
Public works
Total Charges to Appropriations
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 249,475 $ 18,675 $ 298,180 $ 279,505 -91- Page 485 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
South Park District
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
45,786 45,786
Actual
Amounts
45,786
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ $ $ $ -
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Parks and recreation
45,786 45,786 45,786 -
35,000 35,000 15,995 19,005
Total Charges to Appropriations 35,000 35,000 15,995 19,005 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 10,786 $ 10,786 $ 29,791 $ 19,005 -92- Page 486 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Housing Authority (Housing Successor)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ 3,450,463 $3,450,463 $ 3,450,463 $ -
Intergovernmental
Use of money and property
Transfers in
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Community development
Public works
118,149
128,826
234,527
118,149
128,826
234,527
- (118,149)
52,620
-
181,446
234,527
3,931,965 3,931,965 3,866,436 (65,529)
1,014,655
-
1,982,595
188,000
1,317,698
121,888
664,897
66,112
Total Charges to Appropriations 1,014,655 2,170,595 1,439,586 731,009 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 2,917,310 $1,761,370 $ 2,426,850 $ 665,480 -93- Page 487 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Housing & Community Development
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
Actual
Amounts (Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ - $ - $ - $ -
Intergovernmental 171,220 171,220 156,115 (15,105)
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriation (Outflow):
General government
171,220 171,220 156,115 (15,105)
171,220 171,220 156,115 15,105
Total Charges to Appropriations 171,220 171,220 156,115 15,105 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ - $ - $ - $ -
-94- Page 488 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Citizen’s Option for Public Safety
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
Actual
Amounts
208,985
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ 208,985 $ 208,985 $ $ -
Intergovernmental 150,000
1,000
359,985
150,000
1,000
359,985
165,271
6,857
381,113
15,271
5,857
21,128
Use of money and property
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Public safety 190,000 190,000 163,817 26,183
Total Charges to Appropriations 190,000 190,000 163,817 26,183 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 169,985 $ 169,985 $ 217,296 $ 47,311 -95- Page 489 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Air Quality Management District
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
Actual
Amounts
299,567
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ 299,567 $ 299,567 $ $ -
Intergovernmental 45,000
2,000
346,567
45,000
2,000
346,567
56,530
7,289
363,386
11,530
5,289
16,819
Use of money and property
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Public safety 100,000
2,000
155,000
2,000
26,091
2,000
128,909
Transfers out -
Total Charges to Appropriations 102,000 157,000 28,091 128,909 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 244,567 $ 189,567 $ 335,295 $ 145,728 -96- Page 490 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Proposition A Local Transit
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Amounts
$1,628,449
Original Final (Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ 1,628,449 $ 1,628,449 $ -
Taxes 829,564
5,000
2,500
829,564
5,000
2,500
893,758
65,392
2,218
64,194
60,392
(282)
Use of money and property
Miscellaneous
Proceeds from sale of capital asset
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
General government
- - 4,044,551
6,634,368
4,044,551
2,465,513 2,465,513 4,168,855
105,900
643,275
749,175
105,900
1,393,969
1,499,869
102,400
453,080
555,480
3,500
940,889
944,389
Public works
Total Charges to Appropriations
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 1,716,338 $ 965,644 $6,078,888 $ 5,113,244 -97- Page 491 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Transportation Proposition C
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original
$ 2,793,040
Final
$ 2,793,040
Amounts
2,793,040
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ $ -
Taxes 688,101
10,000
3,491,141
688,101
10,000
3,491,141
741,347
65,094
3,599,481
53,246
55,094
108,340
Use of money and property
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Public works 751,800
-
751,800
868,300
2,099,535
2,967,835
37,470
1,939,535
1,977,005
830,830
160,000
990,830
Capital outlay
Total Charges to Appropriations
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 2,739,341 $ 523,306 $ 1,622,476 $ 1,099,170 -98- Page 492 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Open Space Maintenance District
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
(1,112) (1,112)
Actual
Amounts (Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ $ $ (1,112) $ -
Taxes
Transfers in
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Parks and recreation
44,500
12,408
55,796
44,500
28,000
71,388
45,868
28,000
72,756
1,368
-
1,368
59,627 59,627 66,490 (6,863)
Total Charges to Appropriations 59,627 59,627 66,490 (6,863) Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ (3,831) $ 11,761 $ 6,266 $ (5,495) -99- Page 493 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Measure R Transit
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ 1,885,887 $ 1,885,887 $ 1,885,887 $ -
Taxes 516,076
5,000
2,406,963
516,076
5,000
2,406,963
555,850
38,174
2,479,911
39,774
33,174
72,948
Use of money and property
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Capital outlay 559,000 1,902,098 1,053,202 848,896
Total Charges to Appropriations 559,000 1,902,098 1,053,202 848,896 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 1,847,963 $ 504,865 $ 1,426,709 $ 921,844 -100- Page 494 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Measure M Transit
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
Actual
Amounts
2,096,499
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ 2,096,499 $ 2,096,499 $ $ -
Taxes 584,886
5,000
2,686,385
584,886
5,000
2,686,385
628,785
52,149
2,777,433
43,899
47,149
91,048
Use of money and property
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Public works 460,000
500,000
960,000
1,292,970
590,750
1,883,720
478,444
13,279
491,723
814,526
577,471
1,391,997
Capital outlay
Total Charges to Appropriations
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 1,726,385 $ 802,665 $ 2,285,710 $ 1,483,045 -101- Page 495 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Road Maintenance Rehab Act
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ 1,427,184 $ 1,427,184 $ 1,427,184 $ -
Taxes 775,087
9,000
2,211,271
775,087
9,000
2,211,271
779,818
26,762
2,233,764
4,731
17,762
22,493
Use of money and property
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Public Works 1,355,000
75,000
2,151,940
75,000
764,529
-
1,387,411
Capital outlay 75,000
Total Charges to Appropriations 1,430,000 2,226,940 764,529 1,462,411 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 781,271 $ (15,669) $ 1,469,235 $ 1,484,904 -102- Page 496 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Measure W Storm Water
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
Actual
Amounts
871,807
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ 871,807 $ 871,807 $ $ -
Taxes
Intergovernmental
Use of money and property
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Public works
600,000
-
5,000
600,000
-
5,000
597,016
60,766
45,473
(2,984)
60,766
40,473
1,476,807 1,476,807 1,575,062 98,255
1,298,093 1,571,280 239,477 1,331,803
Total Charges to Appropriations 1,298,093 1,571,280 239,477 1,331,803 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 178,714 $ (94,473) $ 1,335,585 $ 1,430,058 -103- Page 497 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
ARPA
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$2,051,110 $2,051,110 $2,051,110 $ -
Intergovernmental 4,021,429 4,021,429 4,021,429 -
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
General government
Public safety
Community development
Parks and recreation
6,072,539 6,072,539 6,072,539 -
729,466
590,331
212,000
970,157
629,620
3,131,574
926,417
590,331
212,000
970,157
678,240
3,377,145
675,705
596,573
201,498
475,591
88,894
250,712
(6,242)
10,502
494,566
589,346
1,338,884
Public works
Total Charges to Appropriations 2,038,261
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 2,940,965 $2,695,394 $4,034,278 $ 1,338,884 -104- Page 498 – 798
City of San Dimas
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
Civic Center Expansion
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance with
Final Budget
Budget Amounts Positive
Original Final
Actual
Amounts
-
(Negative)
Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1
Resources (Inflows):
$ - $ - $ $ -
Transfers in 691,331 691,331 691,330 (1)
Amounts Available for Appropriations
Charges to Appropriations (Outflow):
Debt service:
691,331 691,331 691,330 (1)
Principal retirement
Interest and fiscal charges
Total Charges to Appropriations
669,000
22,331
691,331
669,000
22,331
691,331
669,000
22,330
691,330
-
1 1
Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ - $ - $ - $ -
-105- Page 499 – 798
This page intentionally left blank.
City of San Dimas
Statistical Section
This section of the City’s comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the government’s overall financial health.
CONTENTS
Financial Trends
These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City's financial performance and well being have changed over time.
Revenue Capacity
These schedules contain information to help the reader assess one of the City's most significant local revenue source, the property tax.
Debt Capacity
These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City's current levels of outstanding debt and its ability to issue additional debt in the future.
Demographic and Economic Information
These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City's financial activities take palce.
Operating Information
These schedules contain service and infastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the City's financial report relates to the services the government provides and the activities it performs.
-106- Page 501 – 798
City of San Dimas
Net Position by Component
Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting)
Fiscal Year
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Primary Governmental activities:
Net investment in capital assets
Restricted
$
$
50,226,314
15,418,388
29,058,803
$
$
50,270,910
15,849,000
22,087,577
$
$
50,697,514
16,955,548
24,534,254
$
$
52,739,076
16,787,648
23,640,321
$
$
53,573,745
18,038,395
Unrestricted 22,370,585
Total governmental activities net position 94,703,505 88,207,487 92,187,316 93,167,045 93,982,725 Source: Financial Services Department, City of San Dimas -107- Page 502 – 798
City of San Dimas
Net Position by Component
Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) (Continued) Fiscal Year
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$
$
55,199,101
19,295,053
24,630,198
$
$
56,743,404
21,341,503
21,659,243
$ 51,512,879
24,071,868
29,244,197
$ 51,434,866
30,357,349
31,097,151
$ 54,024,729
37,027,325
36,458,752
99,124,352 99,744,150 $ 104,828,944 $ 112,889,366 $ 127,510,806 -108- Page 503 – 798
City of San Dimas
Change in Net Position
Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting)
Fiscal Year
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Expenses
Governmental activities:
General government
Public Safety
Community development
Parks and Recreation
Public Works
$ 4,889,987
5,731,198
955,535
6,434,958
7,151,344
760,076
$ 4,848,034
5,949,747
1,143,087
6,431,476
8,224,721
735,149
$ 5,757,695
6,090,802
1,989,196
5,448,255
6,358,955
701,799
$ 5,889,325
6,509,016
1,625,287
5,971,097
7,399,161
665,043
$ 6,334,382
6,700,638
2,353,555
7,082,975
7,254,473
Interest on long-term debt 403,516
Total governmental activities expenses 25,923,098 27,332,214 26,346,702 28,058,929 30,129,539 Program Revenues
Governmental activities:
Charges for services
General government
Public Safety
Community development
Parks and Recreation
Public Works
Operating grants and contributions
Capital grants and contributions
Total governmental activities
program revenues
537,420
485,454
1,156,912
809,141
2,023
524,259
460,058
923,130
774,743
166,226
4,194,862
-
444,907
411,459
1,171,387
827,276
207,931
1,165,576
2,568,113
437,909
356,421
1,328,193
782,344
149,483
1,520,786
39,721
409,297
403,715
1,178,146
778,746
137,084
1,473,504
422,779
2,489,253
-
5,480,203 7,043,278 6,796,649 4,614,857 4,803,271
Source: Financial Services Department, City of San Dimas -109- Page 504 – 798
City of San Dimas
Change in Net Position
Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting)
Fiscal Year
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$ 6,742,803
6,994,216
1,704,348
6,524,194
7,525,087
676,698
$ 7,363,084
7,674,680
2,010,361
7,642,991
7,277,121
578,532
$ 7,209,059
7,879,004
2,870,431
7,343,998
7,426,007
472,420
$ 7,286,369
8,227,787
3,551,990
7,311,797
5,798,946
246,468
$ 8,039,072
8,440,191
4,581,529
6,919,256
6,514,247
224,344
30,167,346 32,546,769 33,200,919 32,423,357 34,718,639
394,769
393,674
1,356,185
888,539
146,171
1,962,451
1,257,987
381,241
271,177
1,109,825
404,907
99,237
385,837
371,855
1,141,399
406,183
99,008
370,713
404,322
1,456,547
909,083
120,856
6,186,820
29,268
400,000
434,813
1,679,827
950,662
145,101
6,281,459
224,830
2,186,688
107,415
3,401,453
455
6,399,776 4,560,490 5,806,190 9,477,609 10,116,692
-110- Page 505 – 798
City of San Dimas
Change in Net Position
Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting)
Fiscal Year
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Net (Expense)/Revenue
Governmental activities $ (20,288,936)
(20,288,936)
$ (19,550,053) $ (23,444,072) $ (25,326,268) $ (23,767,570) Total net revenues (expenses) (19,550,053) (23,444,072) (25,326,268) (23,767,570) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Assets
Governmental activities:
Taxes:
Property taxes
Transient occupancy taxes
Sales taxes
Franchise taxes
Business license taxes
Other taxes
Motor vehicle in lieu - unrestricted
Use of money and property
Other
7,790,202
1,278,412
7,338,895
2,217,441
430,500
413,860
15,702
2,468,852
4,949
8,129,299
1,425,666
7,682,009
2,288,824
421,744
906,860
15,167
8,536,072
1,558,201
7,362,116
2,230,072
450,041
285,427
31,601
8,980,958
1,630,226
7,715,674
2,157,253
410,337
408,783
32,594
9,321,478
1,654,586
8,193,741
2,300,699
492,734
1,338,015
34,677
2,483,302
18,878
2,830,668
30,916
2,218,193
16,702
4,499,524
45,214
Extraordinary gains/loss
Total governmental activities
(2,403,799)
19,555,014
- - - -
23,371,749 23,315,114 23,570,720 27,880,668
Changes in Net Position
Governmental activities $ 4,961 $ (72,323) $ (2,011,154) $ (196,850) $ (105,611) -111- Page 506 – 798
City of San Dimas
Change in Net Position
Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) (Concluded) Fiscal Year
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$ (27,986,279) $ (27,394,729) $ (22,945,748) $ (22,945,748) $ (24,601,947) (27,986,279) (27,394,729) (22,945,748) (22,945,748) (24,601,947) 9,766,112
1,616,188
8,849,910
2,274,568
481,438
1,739,019
32,535
9,930,330
1,354,044
8,444,664
2,335,254
497,646
1,341,883
42,437
11,131,195
1,482,082
12,652,341
2,465,655
506,688
974,188
39,574
11,415,585
1,817,839
11,349,279
2,611,805
510,309
1,033,447
53,908
12,343,522
1,770,634
11,583,976
2,817,960
555,480
1,069,290
50,399
4,006,874
142,553
-
4,068,896
63,307
3,204,004
23,796
2,174,085
39,913
4,589,480
4,442,646
- - - -
28,909,197 28,078,461 32,479,523 31,006,170 39,223,387
$ 1,514,468 $ 5,132,713 $ 9,533,775 $ 8,060,422 $ 14,621,440 -112- Page 507 – 798
City of San Dimas
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
General Fund:
Nonspendable:
Land held for resale
Prepaid costs
Advances to other funds
Due from Successor Agency
Restricted for:
$ -
-
$ -
-
$ -
-
$ - $ -
-
-
500
260,893
14,630,305
1,273,721
14,630,305
941,303
14,630,305
500,033
14,630,305 14,525,393
Public safety
Parks and recreation
Public works
Debt service
Housing
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Committed to:
Parks and recreation
Public works
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Assigned to:
Risk management
Emergency
2,845,696
511,923
2,845,696
394,167
2,845,696
410,786
2,845,512
388,540
2,836,512
382,409
New equipment 431,450 490,625 439,517 596,253 433,723
General plan update
Other Post-Employment Benefits
Compensated absences
NPDES
Capital Assets Replacement
Unassigned
250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,199,732 14,081,812 14,296,022 14,738,377 14,642,080
Total General Fund $
$
33,142,827 $
$
33,633,908 $
$
33,372,359 $
$
33,710,380 $
$
33,070,117
All other governmental funds:
Nonspendable:
Land held for resale
Prepaid costs
Advances to other funds
Due from Successor Agency
Restricted for:
3,588,368 - -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,251,330 -
Public safety
Parks and recreation
Public works
Debt service
Housing
- 23,828.00
22,250
5,917,544
744,701
58,185
30,274
7,384,315
758,356
97,045
38,037
7,318,115
726,376
166,082
37,443
8,455,600
745,595
21,076
5,799,003
745,571
4,013,040 9,140,677 8,724,418 8,608,075 8,633,675
Committed to:
Parks and recreation
Public works
339,130
3,231,100
274,471
3,545,741
228,048
5,816,454
- -
4,057,303 3,716,957
Assigned to:
Risk management
Emergency
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
New equipment - - - - -
General plan update
Other Post-Employment Benefits
Compensated absences
NPDES
Capital Assets Replacement
Unassigned
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(8,930,093) (8,731,896) (8,546,406) (8,312,370) (8,138,260) Total all other governmental funds $ 10,058,525 $ 10,937,316 $ 14,453,644 $ 12,532,581 $ 13,617,092 Source: Financial Services Department, City of San Dimas -113- Page 508 – 798
City of San Dimas
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$ - $ -
-
-
$ -
-
-
$ -
-
-
$ -
-
-
3,620
-
13,461,855 12,713,796 11,583,236 10,732,089 9,559,456
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,829,507
377,939
430,913
250,000
-
2,829,307
283,795
229,553
250,000
-
2,829,307
207,285
104,218
250,000
-
2,036,592
1,000,000
1,366,663
2,036,592
1,000,000
1,186,817
250,000
2,978,932
1,264,766
600,000
6,500,000
16,652,393
42,028,956
250,000
2,978,932.00
1,264,766.00
600,000
6,500,000.00
12,154,646
38,883,688
- - -
600,000.00
-
16,508,520
600,000
-
16,807,966
600,000
-
21,966,738
$
$
34,462,354 $
$
33,714,417 $
$
37,540,784 $
$
$
- $
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
178,190
44,151
9,205,006
761,040
186,272
35,289
10,993,899
236
199,982
11,112
14,498,144
236
208,985
-
20,532,711
236
217,296
810,031
26,982,704
236
9,106,666 9,598,191 8,915,813 9,126,293 8,700,411
543,722.00
3,323,657
20,468
3,351,543
129,260
1,625,222
128,047
1,653,522
113,775
1,402,609
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(7,999,602) (7,918,946) (7,446,408) (6,838,741) (6,030,879) $ 15,162,830 $ 16,266,952 $ 17,933,361 $ 24,811,053 $ 32,196,183 -114- Page 509 – 798
City of San Dimas
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Revenues:
Taxes
Licenses and permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Use of money and property
Fines and forfeitures
Miscellaneous
$ 19,275,712
1,124,457
1,526,035
1,539,092
2,283,290
474,387
$ 20,749,161
895,826
1,457,896
1,463,981
2,319,311
447,410
$ 21,104,971
1,137,566
3,497,683
1,511,719
2,661,301
403,275
$ 21,326,133
1,299,593
1,197,442
1,384,307
2,045,171
347,400
$ 23,301,253
1,141,361
1,630,510
1,363,288
2,445,147
395,996
1,036,263
27,259,236
1,754,257
29,087,842
809,267
31,125,782
464,053
28,064,099
566,198
Total revenues 30,843,753
Expenditures
Current:
General government
Public Safety
Community development
Parks & Recreation
Public Works
5,125,396
5,726,645
934,197
4,962,012
5,281,534
665,264
5,408,050
5,945,195
1,035,539
4,962,773
6,881,380
1,984,207
5,794,208
6,086,124
2,201,183
4,438,909
4,833,115
3,181,233
5,882,750
6,504,340
1,648,924
4,560,640
5,430,244
4,058,647
6,053,663
6,695,961
2,172,878
5,133,909
4,605,428
Capital outlay 4,470,791
Debt service:
Principal retirement
Interest and fiscal charges
Advance refunding escrow
Bond Issuance Cost
Total expenditures
728,267
768,052
758,267
742,559
788,267
709,669
829,235
673,005
854,505
412,370
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24,191,367 27,717,970 28,032,708 29,587,785 30,399,505
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over (under)
expenditures 3,067,869 1,369,872 3,093,074 (1,523,686) 444,248 Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 3,249,974 2,869,836 4,670,247 2,718,571 3,015,952 Transfers out (3,249,974) (2,869,836) (4,670,247) (2,718,571) (3,015,952) Proceeds from sale of fixed asset
Refunding bonds issued
Payment to refunded bond escrow agent
Total other financing
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
sources (uses) - - - - -
Lease acquisition
Subscription acquisition
Net change in fund balances
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
3,067,869 $
$
1,369,872 $
$
3,093,074 $
$
(1,523,686) $
$
444,248
Total current expenditures
Less: capital outlay
24,191,367
(665,264)
27,717,970
(1,984,207)
28,032,708
(3,181,233)
29,587,785
(4,058,647)
30,399,505
(4,470,791)
Total non-capital expenditures $
$
23,526,103 $
$
25,733,763 $
$
24,851,475 $
$
25,529,138 $
$
25,928,714
Total debt service expenditures 1,496,319 1,500,826 1,497,936 1,502,240 1,266,875 Debt service as a percentage of
noncapital expenditures 6.4% 5.8% 6.0% 5.9% 4.9%
Source: Financial Services Department, City of San Dimas -115- Page 510 – 798
Fiscal Year
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$ 24,727,235
1,301,807
1,587,365
1,489,843
3,792,704
381,584
$ 23,903,821
1,079,840
1,308,111
919,671
3,886,248
261,133
$ 29,232,820
1,109,910
2,863,799
917,620
3,224,627
353,348
$ 28,801,077
1,420,451
5,575,822
1,398,924
1,712,237
388,140
$ 30,174,968
1,628,251
5,879,352
1,508,896
4,461,263
424,025
1,858,823
35,139,361
765,790
32,124,614
620,250
38,322,374
1,009,935
40,306,586
2,110,548
46,187,303
6,298,071
6,990,133
1,739,677
5,081,064
5,456,831
5,064,440
6,908,139
7,670,003
1,833,166
6,042,039
4,914,180
2,186,093
6,852,486
7,879,004
2,612,116
5,536,653
5,528,937
2,128,751
7,152,312
8,227,787
3,486,510
5,902,879
4,539,581
1,476,163
8,243,375
8,440,191
4,967,286
6,084,787
6,080,416
5,276,294
884,993
686,177
944,507
596,295
-
998,000
412,987
1,408,280
126,680
1,113,571
244,253
1,321,925
211,781
-
-
-
-
-
773,269 -
32,201,386 31,867,691 33,483,894 32,143,056 40,626,055
2,937,975 256,923 4,838,480 8,163,530 5,561,248
2,615,693
(2,615,693)
227,621
(227,621)
-
3,258,000
(3,158,738)
2,123,560
(2,123,560)
-
2,318,400
(2,191,720)
2,459,148
(2,459,148)
2,651,374
(2,651,374)
- 4,469,939
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
99,262 126,680 -
57,066
-
-
- -
-
-
- 499,211
$ 10,530,398
$
2,937,975 $
$
455,447 $
$
5,091,840 $
$
8,220,596 $
32,201,386 $
(5,064,440)
31,867,691
(2,186,093)
33,483,894
(2,128,751)
32,143,056
(1,476,163)
40,626,055
(5,276,294)
$
$
27,136,946 $
$
29,681,598 $
$
31,355,143 $
$
30,666,893 $
$
35,349,761
1,571,170 2,314,071 2,945,947 1,357,824 1,533,706
5.5% 7.8% 9.4% 4.4% 4.3%
-116- Page 511 – 798
This page intentionally left blank.
City of San Dimas
Top 25 Sales Tax Producers
For Fiscal Year 2013-14
Business Name
7 Eleven
Business Category
Service Stations
76 Service Stations
Albertsons Grocery Stores
Arco Service Stations
AT&T Mobility
Chevron
Electronics/Appliance Stores
Service Stations
Chevron Service Stations
Chevron Service Stations
Costco Discount Dept Stores
Office Equipment
Food Service Equip./Supplies
Building Materials
Custom Cooler
Innovative Displayworks
Lowes
Olive Garden
Pacific Sales
Pool & Electrical Products
Raging Waters
Ross
Casual Dining
Electronics/Appliance Stores
Plumbing/Electrical Supplies
Leisure/Entertainment
Family Apparel
SCP Distributors
Second Image
Shell
Drugs/Chemicals
Business Services
Service Stations
State Bros Grocery Stores
Stein Mart
Target
TJ Maxx
Department Stores
Discount Dept Stores
Family Apparel
Walters Wholesale Electric Plumbing/Electrical Supplies Percent of Fiscal Year Total Paid By Top 25 Accounts = 62.57% * Firms Listed Alphabetically
Period: January 2013 Thru December 2013
Sources: State Board of Equalization, California Department of Taxes and Fees Administration, State Controller's Office, The HdL Companies -117- Page 513 – 798
City of San Dimas
Top 25 Sales Tax Producers
For Fiscal Year 2022-23
Business Name
7 Eleven
Business Category
Service Stations
AC Pro
Albertsons
Light Industrial/Printers
Grocery Stores
Arco Service Stations
Berri Brothers Gas Station
Chevron
Service Stations
Service Stations
Costco
Extra Fuel
Discount Dept Stores
Service Stations
KPS Global
Lowes
McDonalds
Mikes Auto Service
Olive Garden
Pool & Electrical Products
Ross
Office Equipment
Building Materials
Ouick-Service Restaurants
Service Stations
Casual Dining
Plumbing/Electrical Supplies
Family Apparel
Saf Com Supply
SCP Distributors
Second Image
Shell
Electrical Equipment
Drugs/Chemicals
Business Services
Service Stations
Show Sushi
State Bros
Casual Dining
Grocery Stores
Target
TJ Maxx
Discount Dept Stores
Family Apparel
Total Wine & More
Walters Wholesale Electric
Convenience Stores/Liquor
Plumbing/Electrical Supplies
Percent of Fiscal Year Total Paid By Top 25 Accounts = 64.75% * Firms Listed Alphabetically
Period: JANUARY 2022 Thru DECEMBER 2022
Sources: State Board of Equalization, California Department of Taxes and Fees Administration, State Controller's Office, The HdL Companies -118- Page 514 – 798
City of San Dimas
Taxable Sales by Category
Last Ten Calendar Years
(in thousands of dollars)
Adjusted for Economic Data
2013 2014
$ 23,253
153,050
20,348
57,838
55,841
2,569
2015
$ 23,983
155,219
20,779
63,829
62,587
3,067
2016
$ 24,660
151,798
21,077
72,134
60,446
3,631
2017
$ 23,516
162,753
21,131
75,103
64,164
4,239
2018
$ 23,593
168,801
21,053
75,034
67,727
6,869
2019
$ 24,081
176,715
22,322
76,662
67,120
4,841
2020
$ 16,367
165,651
26,908
60,085
74,717
3,627
2021
$ 26,467
196,448
26,200
76,211
77,123
3,846
2022
$ 31,015
223,855
26,999
86,506
79,795
4,163
Apparel Stores
General Merchandise
Food Stores
$ 23,158
149,432
20,103
53,621
49,336
2,366
Eating and Drinking Places
Building Materials
Auto Dealers and Supplies
Service Stations
Other Retail Stores
All Other Outlets
60,819
57,614
138,022
57,921
59,912
148,638
50,457
61,650
153,445
44,038
58,363
158,857
54,198
58,166
165,893
60,814
58,095
181,270
60,652
53,327
185,891
44,278
55,457
467,651
59,710
65,761
300,377
83,975
73,290
250,784
Total $554,471 $579,370 $595,016 $595,004 $629,163 $663,256 $671,611 $914,741 $832,143 $860,382 Sources: State Board of Equalization, California Department of Taxes and Fees Administration, State Controller's Office, The HdL Companies Note: Due to confidentiality issues, the names of the ten largest revenue payers are not available. The categories presented are intended to provide alternative information regarding the sources of the City's revenue. -119- Page 515 – 798
This page intentionally left blank.
City of San Dimas
Principal Property Tax Payers
Current Year and Ten Years Ago
2014 2023
Percent of
Total City
Taxable
Assessed
Value
Percent of
Total City
Taxable
Assessed
Value
Taxable
Assessed
Value
Taxable
Assessed
Taxpayer Value
Gilead Sciences Inc.
444 North Amelia Avenue LLC
Majestic MAPA Properties LLC
Costco Wholesale Corporation
PK III San Dimas MarketPlace LLC
Galileo San Dimas LP
Taxpayer
Trails San Dimas LLC
Golden State Water Copany
Mayrland Parkway Property LLC
Majestic MAPA Properties LLC
BRE Knight SH California Owner LLC
Avalon San Dimas LP
Galileo San Dimas LP
Gilead Sciences Inc.
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Avalon Villa San Dimas LP
$ 57,286,290
45,209,774
40,984,908
34,159,866
33,500,000
33,022,283
29,822,615
28,203,859
24,653,076
22,163,555
1.34%
1.05%
0.96%
0.80%
0.78%
0.77%
0.70%
0.66%
0.57%
0.52%
$ 82,505,835
77,853,712
48,984,910
47,713,697
43,527,114
42,930,912
38,319,035
36,126,436
35,816,463
35,068,761
1.27%
1.19%
0.75%
0.73%
0.67%
0.66%
0.59%
0.55%
0.55%
0.54%
Palace Entrainment
MPT of San Dimas MOB LP
Avalon Villa San Dimas LP
Raintree San Dimas LLC
$ 349,006,226 8.14% $ 488,846,875 7.50%
Source: The HDL Companies; Los Angeles County Assessor
Note: The amounts shown above include assessed value data for both the City and the former Redevelopment Agency. -120- Page 517 – 798
City of San Dimas
Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates (rate per $100 of assessed value) Last Ten Fiscal Years
2013-14
1.00000
2014-15
1.00000
2015-16
1.00000
2016-17
1.00000
2017-18
Basic Levy 1.00000
Bonita Unified School District
Charter Oak Unified School District
Citrus Community College District
Covina Valley Unified School District
Glendora Unified School District
Metroplitan Water District
0.08053
0.11888
0.02226
0.11472
0.07800
0.00350
0.02023
-
0.09260
0.11803
0.02327
0.11426
0.07464
0.00350
0.02129
-
0.08489
0.10039
0.01641
0.11062
0.06567
0.00350
0.02154
-
0.08513
0.08605
0.02406
0.12581
0.06816
0.00350
0.02400
-
0.08147
0.09511
0.02229
0.14205
0.06543
0.00350
0.02371
-
Mt. San Antonio College
Pomona Unified School District
Total Direct & Overlapping Tax Rates 1.43812 1.44759 1.40302 1.41671 1.43357 City's Share of 1% Levy per Prop 13
Total Direct Rate
0.09933
0.09291
0.09933
0.09295
0.09933
0.09293
0.09933
0.09300
0.09933
0.09256
Source: Financial Services Department, City of San Dimas Note: In 1978, the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 13, which limited property taxes to a total maximum rate of 1% based upon the assessed value of the property being taxed. Each year, the assessed value of property may be increased by an "inflation factor" (limited to a maximum increase of 2%). With few exceptions, property is only reassessed at the time that it is sold to a new owner. At that point, the new assessed value is reassessed at the purchase price of the property sold. The assessed valuation data shown above represents the only data currently available with respect to the actual market value of taxable property and is subject to the limitations described above. -121- Page 518 – 798
City of San Dimas
Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates (rate per $100 of assessed value) Last Ten Fiscal Years
2018-19
1.00000
2019-20
1.00000
2020-21
1.00000
2021-22
1.00000
2022-23
1.00000
0.07915
0.08891
0.02238
0.13976
0.06870
0.00350
0.02435
-
0.07871
0.08745
0.02172
0.13521
0.06231
0.00350
0.04781
-
0.06554
0.08082
0.02157
0.12658
0.06769
0.00350
0.04459
-
0.06917
0.08061
0.04832
0.12995
0.06984
0.00350
0.04608
0.14056
1.58803
0.06954
0.07578
0.04515
0.12612
0.06816
0.00350
0.04267
0.14580
1.42676 1.43671 1.41029 1.57672
0.09933
0.09297
0.09933
0.09288
0.09933
0.09295
0.09933
0.09288
0.09933
0.09309
-122- Page 519 – 798
City of San Dimas
Assessed Value of Taxable Property
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Category
Residential
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
$ 3,053,901,382
571,450,391
289,340,189
169,264,946
65,020,304
78,660,708
50,154,217
11,507,994
959,363
$ 3,276,323,921
575,146,262
288,370,495
184,283,209
64,599,757
69,600,006
50,333,117
11,550,118
959,363
$ 3,488,819,477
605,176,799
288,118,378
200,229,254
72,177,727
66,160,301
52,068,721
12,557,290
959,363
-
$ 3,672,948,247
615,929,360
298,544,922
222,361,143
74,325,199
69,305,387
52,998,931
13,154,245
318,986
-
$ 3,829,955,695
660,412,877
292,611,002
198,117,047
87,506,858
80,166,517
54,448,000
13,392,042
318,986
-
Commercial
Industrial
Unsecured
Institutional
Vacant Land
Cross Reference
Recreational
SBE Nonunitary
Unknown - 256,075
Irrigated 139,374 139,552 140,342
-
199,908
-
203,905
Exempt - - -
Miscellaneous
Govt. Owned
TOTALS
- - - - -
5,865
4,290,404,733
- - - -
$ $ 4,521,561,875 $ 4,786,407,652 $ 5,020,086,328 $ 5,217,132,929 Total Direct Rate 0.09930% 0.09930% 0.09930% 0.09930% 0.09930% Source: The HdL Companies
Note: In 1978 the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 13 which limited property taxes to a total maximum rate of 1% based upon the assessed value of the property being taxed. Each year, the assessed value of property may be increased by an "inflation factor" (limited to a maximum increase of 2%). With few exceptions, property is only re-assessed at the time that it is sold to a new owner. At that point, the new assessed value is reassessed at the purchase price of the property sold. The assessed valuation data shown above represents the only data currently available with respect to the actual market value of taxable property and is subject to the limitations described above.
-123- Page 520 – 798
City of San Dimas
Assessed Value of Taxable Property
Last Ten Fiscal Years
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
$ 4,009,447,456
688,224,965
299,534,797
195,916,915
97,241,882
81,857,770
58,230,699
21,273,333
318,986
$ 4,137,328,759
709,426,591
308,768,964
197,924,350
95,944,295
90,895,695
62,823,225
8,430,544
318,986
$ 4,329,951,901
732,613,855
319,494,348
191,194,431
118,444,704
103,253,917
64,276,547
8,599,144
572,369
$ 4,477,421,026
770,891,477
326,849,257
206,715,630
125,775,232
104,568,907
82,640,721
9,175,568
78,407
$4,751,232,189
803,684,793
340,773,939
239,425,204
127,302,142
112,748,719
130,346,191
9,359,064
78,407
- - - - -
207,981 43,460 44,328 44,787 1,881,000
- - - - -
- - - - 176
44,880 45,777 46,692 47,175 48,118
$ 5,452,299,664 $ 5,611,950,646 $ 5,868,492,236 $ 6,104,208,187 $6,516,879,942
0.09930% 0.09930% 0.09930% 0.09288% 0.09309%
-124- Page 521 – 798
This page intentionally left blank.
City of San Dimas
2022/23 Use Category Summary
Basic Property Value Table
Category
Residential
Parcels
9,460
323
143
1 Assessed Value Net Taxable Income
$4,767,444,962 (72.3%) $4,751,232,189 (72.9%)
Commercial
Industrial
$807,577,713
$340,773,939
$48,118
(12.3%)
(5.2%)
(0.0%)
(2.4%)
(0.0%)
(0.0%)
(0.1%)
(1.7%)
(0.3%)
(0.0%)
(2.0%)
(3.6%)
$803,684,793
$340,773,939
$48,118
(12.3%)
(5.2%)
(0.0%)
(2.0%)
(0.0%)
(0.0%)
(0.1%)
(1.7%)
(0.0%)
(0.0%)
(2.0%)
(3.7%)
Govt. Owned
Institutional
Irrigated
35 $160,359,074
$1,881,000
$176
$127,302,142
$1,881,000
$176
1 Miscellaneous
Recreational
Vacant
8 21 $9,359,064
$112,748,719
$20,657,434
$78,407
$9,359,064
$112,748,719
$0
763
271
[3]
Exempt
SBE Nonunitary
Cross Reference
Unsecured
Totals
$78,407
[764]
[1,001]
11,026
$130,346,191
$239,435,446
$6,590,710,243
$130,346,191
$239,425,204
$6,516,879,942
Data Source: Los Angeles County Assessor 2021/22 Combined Tax Rolls This report is not to be used in support of debt issuance or continuing disclosure statements without the written consent of HdL, Coren & Cone
-125- Page 523 – 798
City of San Dimas
Legal Debt Margin Information
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year
2014 2015 2016
$4,786,407,652
25%
2017
$5,217,132,929
25%
2018
$5,452,299,664
25%
Assessed valuation
Conversion Factor
$4,521,561,875 $5,020,086,328
25% 25%
Adjusted Assessed Valuation
Legal debt limit percentage
1,130,390,469
15%
1,196,601,913
15%
1,255,021,582
15%
1,304,283,232
15%
1,363,074,916
15%
Debt limit 169,558,570 179,490,287
-
188,253,237
-
195,642,485
-
204,461,237
-
Total net debt applicable to limit:
General obligation bonds -
Legal debt margin $ 169,558,570 $ 179,490,287 $ 188,253,237 $ 195,642,485 $ 204,461,237 Total debt applicable to the limit
as a percentage of debt limit 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Note: The Government Code of the State of California provides for a legal debt limit of 15% of gross assessed valuation. However, this provision was enacted when assessed valuation was based upon 25% of market value. Effective with fiscal year 1981-82, each parcel is now assessed at 100% of market value. Although the statutory debt limit has not been amended by the State since this change, the calculations presented above include a conversion factor of 25% to the assessed valuation to account for the change in the basis on which the legal debt limit is based.
Source: Financial Services Department, City of San Dimas -126- Page 524 – 798
City of San Dimas
Legal Debt Margin Information
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year
2019
$5,611,950,646
25%
2020
$5,868,492,236
25%
2021
$6,104,208,187
25%
2022
$6,104,208,187
25%
2023
$6,516,879,942
25%
1,402,987,662
15%
1,467,123,059
15%
1,526,052,047
15%
1,526,052,047
15%
1,629,219,986
15%
210,448,149
-
220,068,459
-
228,907,807
-
228,907,807
-
244,382,998
-
$ 210,448,149 $ 220,068,459 $ 228,907,807 $ 228,907,807 $ 244,382,998
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
-127- Page 525 – 798
This page intentionally left blank.
City of San Dimas
Direct and Overlapping Debt
As of June 30, 2023
2022-23 ASESSED VALUATION $6,516,879,942
Total Debt
6/30/23
City Share of
Debt 6/30/23
34,203
OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT:
Metropolitan Water District
Citrus Community College District
Mount San Antonio Community College District
Bonita Unified School District
Charter Oak Unified School District
Covina-Valley Unified School District
Glendora Unified School District
%Applicable (1)
0.18%
0.41 $ 19,215,000
130,475,302
882,482,780
112,279,790
58,820
$
$
$
540,168
5.74 46.81
8.42 2.56
50,689,811
52,554,801
4,954,997
4,705,751
703,005
184,178,129
34,477,940 2.04
TOTAL OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT 114,182,736
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND DEBT:
Los Angeles County General Fund Obligations $ 2,601,551,282 3,403,487
254,500,000
9,486,000
775,000
0.34%
0.34 5.74
46.81 8.42
100
8,949,336
11,708
14,618,480
4,440,112
65,286
Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools Certificates of Participation Mount San Antonio Community College District Certificates of Participation Bonita Unified School District Certificates of Participation Charter Oak Unified School District Certificates of Participation City of San Dimas General Fund Obligations
Los Angeles county Sanitation District No. 21
Los Angeles county Sanitation District No. 22
TOTAL DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND DEBT
680,000
468,639
405,950
680,000
431
51,048
0.09 12.58
28,816,401
TOTAL DIRECT DEBT
TOATL OVERLAPPING DEBT
680,000
142,319,137
COMBINED TOTAL DEBT 142,999,137
(1) The percentage of overlapping debt applicable to the city is estimated using taxable assessed property value. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of the overlapping district's assessed value that is within the boundaries of the city divided by the district's total taxable assessed value.
(2) Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes, enterprise revenue, mortgage revenue, non-bonded capital lease obligations, and sales tax revenue bonds.
Ratios to 2022-23 Assessed Valuation:
Direct Debt ($680,000).............................................................................. 0.01% Total Direct and Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt ....................... 1.75% Combined Total Debt ................................................................................2.19% -128- Page 527 – 798
City of San Dimas
Full-time City Employees by Function
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Full-Time Employees as of June 30
Function 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
City Council 5
2 5
2 5
2 5
2 5
City manager's office 2
Administrative services
Community Development Services
Public Works
10 12
15 21
1 10
14 17
23 1
10 13
16 22
1 10
12 16
22 1
10 13
16 22
1 Parks & Recreation
Housing
Total 66 72 69 68 69
Source: Financial Services Department, City of San Dimas -129- Page 528 – 798
City of San Dimas
Full-time City Employees by Function
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Full-Time Employees as of June 30
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
5 2
5 2
5 2
5 2
5 2
10 13
16 23
3 9 11
15 17
20 3
11 15
17 20
3 11
15 17
20 3
16 16
21 3
72 72 73 73 73
-130- Page 529 – 798
City of San Dimas
Demographic and Economic Statistics
Last Ten Calendar Years
Personal
Income (In
Population Thousands)
Per Capita
Personal
Income
% of Pop 25+ % of Pop 25+
Calendar
Year
Unmployment Median with High School with Bachelor's
Rate Age Degree Degree
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
34,072
34,086
34,144
34,231
34,507
34,584
33,945
34,003
34,352
34,079
$1,161,549
1,183,159
1,198,062
1,217,485
1,219,868
1,217,393
1,263,434
1,265,969
1,230,751
1,449,062
$ 34,091
34,711
35,088
35,566
35,351
35,201
37,220
37,231
38,447
42,520
4.4%
6.5%
5.3%
4.1%
3.6%
4.2%
4.1%
10.6%
7.4%
4.4%
43.0 42.2
42.3 42.5
42.1 41.7
41.7 41.3
42.5 42.6
92.0%
92.3%
92.7%
92.1%
92.5%
92.9%
93.0%
93.4%
93.8%
94.2%
33.5%
34.4%
35.8%
35.7%
36.5%
37.2%
37.0%
36.9%
38.1%
37.5%
Source: Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller; Financial Services Department, City of San Dimas -131- Page 530 – 798
Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of December 12, 2023
From: Chris Constantin, City Manager
Prepared by: Anne Moore, Senior Planner
Subject: Discussion of the Draft Downtown Specific Plan ____________________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY
The preparation and adoption of a Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) will guide the City’s growth and all future development and redevelopment of the downtown area, including housing, in order to meet the needs and vision of the community. There has been a total of four (4) out of (5) community workshop meetings held since the DTSP process began a little over two years ago, in addition to an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Scoping Meeting held last November 2022. Additionally, a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) made up of community stakeholders was formed to serve as a voice for the community and four (4) meetings were held with the CAC to ensure that feedback and interests were heard and reflected throughout the process.
Since the last community workshop meeting held on March 29, 2023, Staff and the consultant have continued to work diligently on the DTSP process, including preparation of the EIR, and have provided updates to the Planning Commission and City Council. Although, the EIR is still being prepared by the Consultant, a Draft of the DTSP is now available for review and discussion. The current draft was presented to the Commission on November 16, 2023, for their input, and is now being presented the Council for feedback and input as well. Following input received by the City Council, Staff will finalize the document with the consultant, and hold a fifth and final community workshop meeting early next year. The fifth community workshop meeting will give the public the ability to review the final draft prior to presenting the DTSP to the Planning Commission and City Council during public hearings for final adoption.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council provide Staff input on the Draft Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP).
Draft Downtown Specific Plan Discussion Page 2
For the Meeting of December 12, 2023
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds have already been appropriated to fund the development of the DTSP through three accounts 001.4308.020.019, 001.4308.020.024, and 001.4308.020.000 not to exceed the amount of $487,845. Additional funds are not being requested at this time.
BACKGROUND
Since the last community workshop meeting held on March 29, 2023, Staff and the consultant have continued to work diligently on the DTSP process. Throughout the process, Staff has provided updates to the Planning Commission and City Council. The most recent updates were provided to the Commission on April 6, 2023, and to the Council on April 11, 2023.
Through the course of four (4) community workshop meetings, four (4) meetings with the CAC, and numerous discussions with the project consultant team, a Draft of the DTSP (Attachment 1) has now been prepared and is ready for review and input from the City Council. The Draft DTSP was presented to the Planning Commissioners at the November 16, 2023, Planning Commission meeting to receive their input on the plan document. Comments received from the Commissioners is discussed further along in the staff report.
It is important to note that the previous meeting with the Planning Commission and this City Council meeting are not public hearings, but simply an opportunity for both the Commission and the Council to provide input and ask questions about the plan. Public hearings for final recommendation by the Commission and final action by the Council will follow shortly after the fifth and final community workshop and circulation of the EIR for public review and comment.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The DTSP provides the framework for development and redevelopment for both the historic, traditional commercial downtown along Bonita Avenue, as well as a vision for an expanded geographic area of downtown further east, west, and south of the traditional historic core. The goals and policies of the DTSP are aimed at encouraging a broader mix of land uses, while maintaining the human-scale and historic character of downtown, improving the economic base of the City, creating vibrant and safe public spaces, encouraging new residential development, and providing a variety of mobility options for the first and last mile connections to the future ALine (formerly Gold Line) Light Rail transit station.
The final determination of the plan boundaries was made by City Council at the October 12, 2021, study session. The Council removed from the DTSP the two western most triangular properties that are currently located within the Specific Plan No. 23 area and expanded the boundary area to the east to take advantage of opportunity sites, as identified in the Certified Housing Element, that can serve as catalysts for future revitalization of the Downtown. Existing established singlefamily neighborhoods surrounding the commercial core have been intentionally excluded from the DTSP boundaries in order to focus on areas of potential growth and to preserve the existing and historic single-family neighborhoods in the vicinity. The exact delineation of the DTSP area is outlined in red in Figure 1 below:
Draft Downtown Specific Plan Discussion Page 3
For the Meeting of December 12, 2023
Figure 1 - Downtown Specific Plan Boundary
The Draft DTSP is organized into ten chapters, all of which contain the vision, zoning standards and design guidelines, infrastructure design, and implementation procedures for all land within the plan area. After adoption of the plan, subsequent tract or parcel maps, development agreements, local public work projects, zoning text or map amendments, and any action requiring ministerial or discretionary approval related to Downtown San Dimas must be consistent with the DTSP. The planning area has been divided into six sub-areas: Gateway Village West, Gateway Village East, Transit Village, Town Core, Public/Semi-Public, and Open Space as shown in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2 - Downtown Specific Plan Areas
Draft Downtown Specific Plan Discussion Page 4
For the Meeting of December 12, 2023
The characteristics of the six sub-areas varies as a reflection of the different allowable land uses, building scale, architectural style, and development intensity for each of the respective areas.
Multi-family development will be permitted in all sub-areas except for Public/Semipublic and Open Space. In addition, to be in compliance with Housing Element for the 2021-2029 planning period, a Housing Element Sites Overlay has been included that identifies the sites that can accommodate the City’s assigned housing need as identified in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). These sites are located throughout the DTSP, with majority of the sites located within the Gateway Village West, which are in closer proximity to the freeway and away from existing single-family neighborhoods. In addition, the plan creates standards that will allow for more vibrancy and mixed-use development within the Transit Village, which surrounds the future A-Line Light Rail transit station.
New development regulations such as the creation of “setbacks” will help to control the massing and scale of new projects that are being proposed within the DTSP. These “setbacks” will require new development to push back the third and fourth floors of buildings sited along important street frontages such as Bonita Avenue and San Dimas Avenue. The implementation of “setbacks” will provide architectural relief and help to reduce the appearance of buildings that are over two (2) stories in height throughout the plan area. Design standards for building modulation will help break up large wall planes and help contribute to additional landscaping opportunities or creating spaces for people to gather. Additional standards such as minimum depth for ground floor commercial space is introduced in the plan area to allow for more functional spaces that will be conducive for restaurants, retail, and other uses that will further promote a pedestrian-friendly environment within the downtown.
The plan will also include design standards and guidelines that will not only provide clear guidance for property owners, developers, and City staff, but also to ensure new development will be consistent with the high-quality architecture the City strives to maintain. All new projects will be required to comply with both the design standards and guidelines. However, projects that are eligible for streamlining under the State’s housing streamline legislation, which require 50 percent of the units to be affordable, among other eligible criteria, will only be subject to the design standards which are objective and do not involve any subjective judgement.
The DTSP will also introduce a Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) approval process which will help streamline the approval process of certain land uses that will assist with the revitalization of the downtown area, but still allow for city staff to place conditions to protect the nearby neighborhoods. All of these new strategies and implementation tools along with various mitigation measures that will be incorporated into the EIR, will guide the City’s growth and all future development and redevelopment of the downtown area.
During the November 16, 2023, Planning Commission meeting (Attachment 2), City Staff and the Consultant provided a brief overview of the various components of the Draft DTSP and invited the Commission to provide their input and to ask any questions that they may have. Overall, the Commission was in support of the Draft DTSP as presented, but they did share the following comments:
• The strategy for Gateway Village East should be revised to include language that captures the importance of maintaining the existing multiple-family residential within this sub-area.
Draft Downtown Specific Plan Discussion Page 5
For the Meeting of December 12, 2023
• Of the main goals of the plan is to activate the downtown and introduce new uses, including entertainment uses. Therefore, the plan’s vision statement should “entertainment” as one of the uses.
• Reconsider not allowing three-story buildings on the Forestry site; however, if they are allowed, require greater setbacks along property lines that abut single-family residences to minimize the height effects of tall buildings and privacy coming from the new developments of multi-story buildings.
• If terraces or balconies are allowed on upper levels, consider requiring larger setbacks if adjacent to single-family properties to address privacy issues. • Consider incorporating design standards that limit windows on upper levels of multi-family developments that face single single-family residential properties, and/or consider increasing the required setback if windows that look into single-family residential backyards are proposed.
• Gateway Village West encompasses a very large area that could be considered two areas:
the large parcels near the 57 freeway and the area between Euclid Avenue and Cataract Avenue. The area between Euclid and Cataract could be a different sub-area that acts as a transition to the Town Core, or the Town Core sub-area boundary could be extended to Eucla Avenue.
• There needs to be better wayfinding signage to encourage people to go to Downtown. • If the City wants to encourage outdoor dining, seating should not be limited to 15 seats.
The number of seats should be up to the business owner and/or based on the limitations of the lease area/restaurant size.
• Concerns were shared regarding the existing infrastructure and water capacity within the DTSP boundary, and how this concern would be addressed when developments are proposed.
• Section 5.10 Historic Preservation and Adaptive Reuse, should include language that encourages any proposed buildings or remodel of existing buildings to be in the “Early California” architectural theme.
• Parking spaces in ownership (for-sale) multi-family units should not be leased or sold separately (unbundled). Okay to leave unbundled option for rental units. • Concerns were expressed with the requirement of large developments to provide publicly accessible open space that may not have any public frontage such as the USDA Forestry site.
This is just a brief overview of the DTSP to provide the Council a better understanding of the overall goals of the plan and touches on some of the key aspects of the plan. The goal of this meeting is to initiate a discussion and gather input from the Council on the plan as well any feedback relative to the comments that were shared by the Commission. Both the Commission’s and Council’s comments will be incorporated into the DTSP and will be presented to the public at the fifth and final community workshop meeting. As previously mentioned, public hearings for final
Draft Downtown Specific Plan Discussion Page 6
For the Meeting of December 12, 2023
recommendation by the Commission and final action by the Council will follow shortly after the fifth and final community workshop and circulation of the EIR for public review and comment.
ALTERNATIVES
There is no alternative draft of the DTSP proposed at this time.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The DTSP has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is currently being prepared to respond to the anticipated environmental impacts associated with the DTSP and will be made available for public review likely in the upcoming months. Certain projects may require additional specific environmental review as necessary if they do not conform with the DTSP.
Respectfully submitted,
Anne Moore
Senior Planner
Attachments:
1. Draft Downtown Specific Plan
2. Planning Commission Staff Report and Draft Minutes – November 16, 2023
3. Presentation
SAN DIMAS
DOWNTOWN
SPECIFIC PLAN
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023
ATTACHMENT 1
PREPARED BY INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP
NOVEMBER 2023 DRAFT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction and Purpose............................................................2
1.2 Specific Plan Area Context...........................................................3
1.3 Relationship to the General Plan and Other
Governing Documents.................................................................8
1.4 Specific Plan Organization.........................................................10
1.5 Community Engagement...........................................................11 CHAPTER 2: VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK,
AND STRATEGIES
2.1 Introduction...............................................................................16
2.2 Vision Statement.......................................................................16
2.3 Goals and Policies......................................................................16
2.4 Land Use Plan Framework and Strategies.................................25
3.1 Chapter Overview......................................................................38
3.2 Applicability...............................................................................38
3.3 Zoning Designations..................................................................38
3.4 Allowable Land Uses.................................................................42 CHAPTER 3: ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 4: DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
4.1 Purpose and General Provisions...............................................50
4.2 Regulating Plan..........................................................................50
4.3 Development Standards............................................................52
4.4 Development Incentives for the Provision of
Bonus Public Parking in the Gateway Village
West Area..................................................................................76 CHAPTER 5: DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
5.1 Introduction...............................................................................78
5.2 Purpose......................................................................................78
5.3 Standards vs. Guidelines...........................................................78
5.4 Applicants..................................................................................78
5.5 Site Planning..............................................................................79
5.6 Building Design..........................................................................83
5.7 Landscape Design......................................................................92
5.8 Sustainable Design....................................................................97
5.9 Street Activation........................................................................99
5.10 Historic Preservation and Adaptive Reuse..............................103
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 6: MOBILITY
6.1 Introduction.............................................................................107
6.2 Mobility Strategies..................................................................108
6.3 Street Network........................................................................110
6.4 Transit Circulation....................................................................132
6.5 Pedestrian Circulation.............................................................136
6.6 Bicycle Circulation...................................................................140
6.7 Signage and Wayfinding..........................................................144
6.8 Parking.....................................................................................146 CHAPTER 7: INFRASTRUCTURE
7.1 Introduction.............................................................................152
7.2 Water Service...........................................................................152
7.3 Sanitary Sewer Service............................................................158
7.4 Storm Drainage........................................................................163
7.5 Electrical Services....................................................................166
7.6 Natural Gas..............................................................................166
7.7 Telecommunications and Cable...............................................166 CHAPTER 8: ADMINISTRATION
8.1 General....................................................................................168
8.2 Land Divisions.........................................................................169
8.3 Entitlement Processes Established in the
San Dimas Municipal Code.....................................................169
8.4 Entitlement Processes Established in this
Specific Plan............................................................................169
8.5 Non-Conforming Uses and Structures....................................172 CHAPTER 9: IMPLEMENTATION
9.1 Introduction.............................................................................175
9.2 Area-Specific Fees, Dedications, and Exactions......................176
9.3 SpecialDistricts........................................................................177
9.4 Federal and State Grants.........................................................178
9.5 Implementation and Phasing..................................................181 CHAPTER 10: GLOSSARY
10.1 Definitions...............................................................................185
SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 1:
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction and Purpose .....................................................2
1.2 Specific Plan Area Context ....................................................3
1.3 Relationship to the General Plan and Other
Governing Documents...........................................................8
1.4 Specific Plan Organization...................................................10
1.5 Community Engagement.....................................................11
2 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
1.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
San Dimas is fortunate to have an established, charming historic downtown area which consists of many historic residences, commercial buildings, and churches.
Downtown San Dimas is a prime example of the American town center, with commercial development centered around a short but prominent main street, Bonita Avenue. An established grid pattern of the street network and established architectural form and building siting provide a distinct character to the downtown core, both on the Bonita corridor and in the surrounding residential neighborhoods.
This Downtown San Dimas Specific Plan provides the framework for development and redevelopment for both the historic, traditional commercial downtown along Bonita Avenue, as well as a vision for an expanded geographic area of downtown further east, west, and south of the traditional historic core. The plan area boundaries have been intentionally selected to exclude historic residential neighborhoods and to focus development and redevelopment in the historic commercial core as well as in adjacent areas that are predominantly commercial in nature, with the vision of an expanded downtown area. It anticipates demand for and production of new multi-family housing as an implementation tool of the Housing Element of the General Plan, and also anticipates future impacts of the new Metro A Line light rail station that will be opening in 2025.
The vision statement below and the Specific Plan itself is the culmination of an extensive public outreach process conducted between Fall of 2021 and Fall of 2023 as well as through technical planning and design input from community members, City staff, a Community Advisory Committee, a Technical Advisory Committee, the Planning Commission, and the City Council.
“Downtown is the heart of the City of San Dimas - a walkable and vibrant activity center which celebrates and preserves its human-scale character for people of all ages, provides a diversity of retail, restaurant, cultural, and civic uses, provides a variety of housing options, and creates local employment opportunities which breathe life and activity into the historic commercial center of the City.”
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 3
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
The Downtown Specific Plan offers:
• A community supported vision and guiding principles that encourage a vibrant and pedestrian-friendly downtown, and goals and policies to guide decision-makers in achieving the community’s vision for the downtown area.
• Zoning and land uses which encourage the development of new housing, commercial, and recreational opportunities, objective development and design standards to provide clear guidance for property owners, developers, and City staff, and streamlined review and approval processes. • Infrastructure and mobility recommendations to ensure infrastructure is adequately addressed and to promote safe and efficient circulation, active transportation, and complete streets.
• Implementation strategies and tools to encourage redevelopment and economic investment of residential and commercial development and to promote projects and partnerships.
1.2 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA CONTEXT
1.2.1 LOCATION
San Dimas is located within the eastern San Gabriel Valley, approximately 25 miles east of Los Angeles and along the southerly foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains (see Figure 1.2-1, Regional Location). Central to the City of San Dimas is its traditional town center, anchored by a short but prominent section of Bonita Avenue, which is the City’s main street. Downtown is the city’s historic and civic core (see 1.2-2, Aerial Photo of Downtown Core).
4 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
Figure 1.2-1: Regional Location Map
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 5
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
Figure 1.2-2: Aerial Photo of Downtown Core
Downtown
Core
Gold Line
Station
S Cataract Ave
W Bonita Ave
Arrow Hwy
6 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
1.2.2 HISTORY
For centuries, Native Americans named Tonga lived in the San Gabriel region including San Dimas. The San Gabriel Mission was established in 1771 and the Franciscan monks of Spain claimed the entire San Gabriel Valley including San Dimas as their estate. In 1810, Mexico claimed independence from Spain and took over the land. The mission recruited the local Native Americans to Christianity, and taught them agricultural and building skills.
The early settlement of San Dimas was called Mud Springs, and briefly Mound City.
In 1837, Don Ygnacio Palmares received the Rancho San Jose as part of a Mexican land grant. Local legend is that Don Ygnacio Palomares gave the name “San Dimas” to Horsethief Canyon because of the practice of horse thieves hiding their stolen goods in the area where he kept some of his cattle. It was said that in exasperation, the Don made reference to St. Dismas, the repentant thief on the Cross, and wished that the horse thieves would also repent and stop the depredations of his livestock.
In the late 1800s, San Dimas evolved as an agricultural community and became wellknown for its orange and other citrus crops. The railroad also played an important role in the city’s early development, connecting the City to the broader region and spurring a housing and economic boom. Preserved buildings of its history remain, particularly along Bonita Avenue. The citrus nurseries faded and started disappearing in the mid-1900s as increasing development occurred in San Dimas. The City incorporated in 1960.
Shortly following incorporation, the City experienced the majority of its residential development during the decades of the 1960s to 1990s, with the completion of specific plans in the community. Today, the city is noted for well-designed subdivisions, and a mix of semi-rural to suburban neighborhoods. Historical elements of the city remain and include its downtown, rail lines, and historic businesses and homes. Employment ranges from warehousing, services, and retail to a mix of technology, information, and professional services. The city has several community parks and many recreational services are offered and enjoyed by its residents.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 7
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
1.2.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS
An existing conditions analysis is provided in Chapter 2.
1.2.4 SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARIES
The San Dimas Downtown Specific Plan area is generally bounded by State Route 57 freeway to the west, 2nd Street to the north, San Dimas Canyon Road to the east, and Arrow Highway to the south. The Downtown Specific Plan area is approximately 202 acres in size.
Existing established single-family neighborhoods surrounding the commercial core have been intentionally excluded from the Downtown Specific Plan boundaries in order to focus on areas of potential growth and to preserve the existing and often historic single-family neighborhoods in the vicinity. The exact delineation of the Downtown Specific Plan area is demarcated in red in the map below:
Figure 1.2-3: Specific Plan Boundaries
8 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
1.3 RELATIONSHIP TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND
OTHER GOVERNING DOCUMENTS
1.3.1 AUTHORITY
The San Dimas Downtown Specific Plan is established through the authority granted to the City of San Dimas by California Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457 (Specific Plans). As expressed in California law, Specific Plans may be adopted either by ordinance or by resolution.
This Specific Plan is a regulatory plan that provides the vision, zoning standards and design guidelines, infrastructure design, and implementation procedures for all land within the plan area. Subsequent tract or parcel maps, development agreements, local public work projects, zoning text or map amendments, and any action requiring ministerial or discretionary approval related to Downtown San Dimas must be consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan.
1.3.2 RELATIONSHIP TO THE GENERAL PLAN
A Specific Plan effectively establishes a link between the implementing policies of the General Plan and the individual development proposals in a defined area. California Code Section 65302.4 authorizes the General Plan, and the zoning ordinances that implement the General Plan, to express community intentions regarding urban form and design. This means that the Downtown Specific Plan may be used to express those intentions and that it may also provide the zoning and standards for implementation. To ensure consistency between the Downtown San Dimas Specific Plan and the San Dimas General Plan, the General Plan will be amended alongside the adoption of this Specific Plan to include a Downtown San Dimas Specific Plan land use designation to replace the existing General Plan land use designations for the Plan Area.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 9
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
1.3.3 RELATIONSHIP TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
The provisions contained in this Plan constitute the primary land use and development standards for the Specific Plan area. These regulations are applied in addition to the provisions set forth in the City of San Dimas Municipal Code. Where any provision of this Plan and the Municipal Code appear to be in conflict, the provisions of this Plan shall prevail.
For matters on which this Plan is silent, the provisions of the Municipal Code shall apply. As part of the implementation of this Specific Plan, the Municipal Code shall be amended to include the Specific Plan Area zoning designation, including its associated land use areas.
1.3.4 RELATIONSHIP TO THE TOWN CORE DESIGN
GUIDELINES
The Downtown Specific Plan provide design standards and guidelines for a portion of San Dimas’s historic town core area that lies within the Specific Plan boundaries. For properties that are in the Town Core but fall outside the Specific Plan boundaries, the existing Town Core Design Guidelines shall be used to review new development projects or remodels of existing structures.
1.3.5 RELATIONSHIP TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
The San Dimas Downtown Specific Plan has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared to respond to the anticipated environmental impacts associated with the project. In conjunction with one another, the DTSP and EIR for the Specific Plan area may reduce the need for project-specific environmental review in areas that have been analyzed by the EIR, subject to findings that there are no significant changes in conditions and that the project complies with the DTSP’s requirements, and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15177 and Public Resources Code 21157.1. Certain projects may require additional specific environmental review as necessary if they do not conform with the DTSP. This could include targeted studies on one or more identified environmental concerns. The City will make these determinations and environmental review may be incorporated in the development approval process.
10 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
1.4 SPECIFIC PLAN ORGANIZATION
The Downtown Specific Plan is organized into ten Chapters as follows:
• Chapter 1 – Introduction. This chapter provides background information about the Specific Plan. A brief background of the Specific Plan area and project setting are included. This section provides a description of the history, purpose, and function of the Specific Plan; it educates the reader on the information contained within the Specific Plan document in the Chapters that follow.
• Chapter 2 – Vision, Downtown Framework, and Strategies. This chapter establishes the overall vision for the plan area as well as goals and policies meant to implement the vision. A discussion is also provided on the logic and framework behind the formation of each of the areas. • Chapter 3 – Zoning and Land Use. This chapter establishes the zones for the specific plan area and the types of land uses allowed for potential new development within each zone.
• Chapter 4 – Development Regulations. This chapter provides standards for development, including but not limited to allowable densities and heights, as well as required setbacks, open space, and parking standards. • Chapter 5 – Design Standards and Guidelines. The Design Standards and Guidelines embedded in this chapter of the plan further support the development regulations contained within Chapter 4. The purpose of the Design Standards and Guidelines is to identify and establish visual themes that are aesthetically pleasing and will result in a cohesiveness to create a “sense of place” for persons who live, work, or visit the Specific Plan area.
• Chapter 6 – Mobility. The Specific Plan addresses circulation and multi-modal travel in the specific plan area. This includes potential improvements to transit routes, facilities, and accessibility. Alternative and active transportation networks, linkages, and accessibility. The Specific Plan will also cover parking and related issues as appropriate. • Chapter 7 – Infrastructure. This chapter discusses existing conditions and proposed improvements to sewer, water, storm drain systems, and dry utilities to serve the Specific Plan area at full build-out. Public and private utility providers are also identified.
• Chapter 8 – Administration. The intent of this chapter is to provide administration and efficient entitlement processing guidance for future development and build-out of the Specific Plan.
• Chapter 9 – Implementation. Implementation strategies, tools, and incentives - including public and private funding and financing mechanisms - are addressed in this chapter.
• Chapter 10 – Glossary. This chapter provides a glossary of terms and definitions used in the Specific Plan document.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 11
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
1.5 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
From 2021-2023, San Dimas City staff and the consultant team actively incorporated community engagement with residents, workers, downtown business owners, property owners, visitors, and other key stakeholders into the planning process to understand shared values and goals for the future of Downtown San Dimas and ensure a transparent, collaborative process. Community members provided input through a variety of engagement opportunities including a series of community workshops, innovative online engagement tools, Community Advisory Committee meetings, and public hearings.
As this specific plan was prepared during the global Covid-19 pandemic, a variety of inperson and remote community engagement tools and activities were utilized to gain input and feedback from residents and stakeholders of San Dimas throughout the process.
This section will provide a summary of public outreach methods and specific outreach activities throughout the planning process.
1.5.1 COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS
The City of San Dimas hosted a series of public community workshops and events from February 2022 through Spring 2024. The public workshops are described in more detail below:
A. Workshop #1 - Issues, Opportunities, and Assets - February 23, 2022 In February 2022, City staff and consultants hosted the first Community Workshop for the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) with the purpose of introducing the project and providing an overview of existing conditions. The meeting took place virtually over Zoom due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The workshop began with a brief presentation introducing DTSP project staff and key information about the planning process, including the project’s objectives, plan area, timeline, scope, and future opportunities for community participation. City staff and the consultant team then answered questions about the DTSP planning process, which were submitted by community members through an online poll. Last, community members engaged in small group discussions focusing on what stakeholders appreciate about Downtown San Dimas, challenges facing the Downtown area today, and opportunities for the future.
12 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
B. Workshop #2 - Envisioning Downtown San Dimas - May 11, 2022 In Community Workshop #2, the City hosted an in-person event where community members identified opportunities for improvement in Downtown San Dimas and provided input about future uses and urban form in the Specific Plan area. First, attendees completed an exercise asking for their preferences of images illustrating different residential building types and forms for San Dimas’ Town Core and Gateway Areas, open space types and programming, and street character and use. The consultant team then gave a brief presentation to provide additional context about the Specific Plan process and updates on the project so far. The presentation included a summary of public input to-date from Community Meeting #1, online engagement on the project MindMixer site, and Community Advisory Committee and Technical Advisory Committee meetings. Further, project staff shared the draft San Dimas DTSP Vision Statement and Goals and requested written feedback from community members. Finally, community members participated in a small group exercise to describe, draw, and/or write their vision for the future of the Downtown area on large, printed maps, discussing land use and building form, open space, and mobility.
C. Workshop #3 - Downtown Concept Plan and Mobility Concepts – August 11, 2022
In Community Workshop #3, the City hosted another in-person community workshop to review and discuss the proposed land use areas shown on a preliminary draft Land Use Concept Plan. A description of the designations, anticipated land uses, expected number of stories, and photos of the types of developments that could occur for each of the areas were discussed with participants. Participants were also asked what types of amenities would be important in the Specific Plan area, including community gathering spaces, public artwork, outdoor dining areas along sidewalks, or other amenities.
In addition, opportunities for improvements along key streets, creation of gateway elements, and linkages were discussed with community participants. Attendees were also asked to help prioritize several items including street trees, sidewalk amenities, bike lanes, pedestrian crossings, and traffic calming measures.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 13
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
D. Workshop #4 - Draft Downtown Land Use and Mobility Plan Concepts – March 29, 2023
In Community Workshop #4, the City hosted an open house style community meeting for participants to review in progress materials that were being developed for the Specific Plan. This included the revised draft Land Use Concept Plan, draft allowed land uses table, and draft development and design standards. Mobility concept plans were also shared at the meeting, including example street improvements that could occur with bicycle and pedestrian amenities.
Concept plans and renderings for two opportunity sites in the downtown specific plan area, identified in the recently adopted Housing Element, were also shared and discussed with attendees at the meeting. The concept plan showed a potential vision of the western area of the specific plan with new residential, commercial, and mixed use buildings, including public spaces for local residents and visitors to enjoy.
E. Workshop #5 - Draft Specific Plan Document – TBD
1.5.2 ONLINE PUBLIC OUTREACH
An interactive project website was developed using Mindmixer to serve as a portal for the specific plan process to provide useful project information such as background documents, a project timeline, community workshops and presentations, interactive maps, online surveys, and social media connections. The Specific Plan Mindmixer site encouraged broad-based community input and additional ways to engage with the project beyond public meetings. Interactive surveys, polls, and maps on Mindmixer asked community members to reflect on what they like about Downtown San Dimas, how Downtown can be improved, and ideas for Downtown. These online engagement methods also provided opportunities to share feedback on the Specific Plan vision statement and goals and preferences for future uses and urban form in Downtown San Dimas.
14 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
1.5.3 COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)
The Community Advisory Committee (CAC) served as a voice for the community to provide input to City staff and the consultant team throughout the planning process.
Comprised of area residents, business owners, and property owners, the CAC held four meetings to shape the development of the specific plan and ensure that community interests are heard and reflected. CAC members provided feedback on Specific Plan goals, land use concept alternatives, Downtown design guidelines, and more.
A. CAC Meeting #1 - January 26, 2022
B. CAC Meeting #2 - April 13, 2022
C. CAC Meeting #3 - June 23, 2022
D. CAC Meeting #4 - January 18, 2023
1.5.4 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was formed to gather input on technical aspects of the Specific Plan and facilitate ongoing collaboration after the adoption of the Specific Plan. The TAC included representation from City of San Dimas staff from various departments and divisions, Metro, Foothill Transit, Bonita Unified School District, among other necessary agencies.
A. TAC Meeting #1 - December 9, 2021
B. TAC Meeting #2 - TBD
SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 2:
VISION, DOWNTOWN
FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
2.1 Introduction.........................................................................16
2.2 Vision Statement.................................................................16
2.3 Goals and Policies................................................................16
2.4 Land Use Plan Framework and Strategies ..........................25
16 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The Downtown Specific Plan sets a vision that describes the community’s key values and aspirations for the plan area. This chapter provides a guiding vision statement, goals, and specific policies to help guide future development, growth, and resources in achieving the communitysupported vision for downtown.
2.2 VISION STATEMENT
A Vision Statement was crafted with community and stakeholder input during the preparation of the specific plan. It paints a picture of how the planning area will develop for years to come. This is a vision for how the area will appear 20 years from now as future development decisions and public improvements are guided by the Specific Plan.
New development and improvements in the Specific Plan area should actively contribute to the fruition of this statement:
Downtown is the heart of the City of San Dimas - a
walkable and vibrant activity center which celebrates
and preserves its human-scale character for people
of all ages, provides a diversity of retail, restaurant, cultural, and civic uses, provides a variety of housing options, and creates local employment opportunities
which breathe life and activity into the historic
commercial center of the City.
2.3 GOALS AND POLICIES
The following goals and policies are aimed at encouraging a broader mix of land uses, while maintaining the human-scale and historic character of downtown, improving the economic base of the City, creating vibrant and safe public spaces, encouraging new market-rate, affordable, and workforce housing, and providing a variety of mobility options for the first and last mile connections to transit. In addition, the goals and policies were crafted to align with the City’s General Plan and other important City policy and regulatory documents.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 17
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.3.1 HUMAN-SCALE ENVIRONMENT WITH HISTORIC
CHARACTER
San Dimas is unique and is loved by its community for its small-town charm, and the authentic historic distinctiveness of its downtown should be maintained. Downtown San Dimas possesses a rich architectural heritage with an eclectic mix of commercial and institutional buildings, several of which are on the City’s historic inventory list. The Specific Plan area contains a variety of civic spaces and many essential retail uses that are appropriate for the heart of the city. Much of the Specific Plan area abuts established residential neighborhoods with homes and church buildings that are listed on the City’s historic inventory list. The layout of blocks and streets are based upon a historic grid pattern, with small, walkable city blocks woven into the fabric of the area. Downtown possesses a character that establishes the community’s sense of place and its identity. The existing small town-scale and historic charm of the area should be preserved and protected, and new development should respect and enhance the character and architectural integrity of the area. Historic preservation measures should be implemented to preserve existing assets, and policies should be established that require that new development be sensitive to the existing context and surroundings in terms of scale, height, massing, architectural design, streetscapes, and open space.
A. Policies
1. Historic Preservation. Preserve, enhance, and distinguish the Downtown’s small-town charm and its historic resources. Protect all historic structures and unreinforced masonry structures.
2. Unified Street Character. Create a unified street character along Bonita Avenue with consistent building setbacks, building frontages, landscaping, and street furniture.
3. Building Compatibility. Ensure that new developments are compatible with the height, scale, massing, architectural design, and frontages of existing development.
4. Historic Core. Historic commercial core should be distinguished from the eastern/western edge in character.
5. Placemaking. Enhance the feeling of a sense of place with wayfinding signs and landmarks.
6. Lot Consolidation. Incentivize lot consolidation where appropriate to facilitate the development of cohesive development projects.
7. Adaptive Reuse. Encourage adaptive reuse of historic structures and appropriately scaled infill development.
18 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.3.2 A DIVERSE ECONOMY WITH A BROAD MIX OF
LAND USES AND ACTIVITIES
While the Specific Plan area possesses some of the city’s historic core and essential uses, the downtown can grow in its potential to provide a diversity of uses to serve the various needs and population of the community. Encouraging a broad mix of land uses will not only generate economic growth, but also infuse life and activity into the downtown area to make it an attractive place to visit throughout the entire span of the day, providing an environment where individuals and families can shop, dine, meet, socialize, recreate, celebrate together, engage, and gather.
Land uses such as restaurants, bars, theaters, and cinemas can help bring activity into the downtown and provide opportunities for social and leisure enjoyment by residents and visitors. Allowing for a variety of housing types within the Specific Plan area will provide much-needed housing for future residents and inherently immerse patrons into the immediate area that are necessary for the desired businesses to thrive. With the anticipated development of the A Line, developers, residents, and business owners can also maximize on the opportunity to draw in more visitors to activate the local economy.
A. Policies
1. Infill Development. Ensure compatible, infill development around the A Line (formerly the Gold Line and L Line) station and in the Downtown area.
2. Diversity of Use. Promote a mix of uses and services to support the needs of the entire community including families, youth, and seniors.
3. Commercial Use Near Transit. Encourage convenient retail, food, and other services in proximity to the Metro train station.
4. National and Local Business. Encourage a mix of national brand and local merchant businesses.
5. Activate Public Streets. Require developers to design buildings with entrances and windows oriented to the street to emphasize a community, pedestrian-oriented atmosphere.
6. Increase Daytime Population. Encourage second and third floor office uses to increase the daytime population of downtown.
7. Public Private Partnership. Facilitate public-private partnerships to share responsibility for implementing the Specific Plan.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 19
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.3.3 VIBRANT AND ACTIVE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
SPACES
Vibrant public spaces are integral to the success of any great downtown.
They help build a sense of community, civic identity, and culture. Public spaces facilitate social capital, economic development, and community revitalization, and these public spaces should offer safe, comfortable, inviting, and interesting places for different purposes such as civic and community events, socialization, recreation, exercise, and leisure.
Downtown San Dimas has distinctive places that offer memorable experiences along Bonita Avenue and around the Civic Center.
Redevelopment opportunities west of Cataract Avenue and around the future transit station can create new places that fit in with the existing context, while providing a rich new public realm, and enhancing the downtown experience.
Private spaces can also enhance pedestrian activity by encouraging new development to provide plazas, courtyards, paseos, arcades, and galleries, which promote safe and active communities.
A. Policies
1. Enhanced Public Realm. Create a safe and enhanced public realm through careful placement and design of street trees, public art, street furnishings, bike racks, landscaping, signage, newsstands, street lights, paving and trash receptables.
2. Improve Pedestrian Linkages. Enhance pedestrian linkages between the future A Line station and Bonita Avenue.
3. Activate Public Realm. Encourage new development and events that are designed for pedestrians and activate the public realm.
4. Community Gathering Spaces. Expand or create places and spaces where community events and festivals can occur.
5. Improve Connectivity and Open Space. Expand and maintain an enhanced, interconnected system of public parks, trails and open space in the Downtown area.
6. More Shade. Incorporate trees and shade in the public realms to support walking, cycling, and outdoor recreation and dining.
7. Community Benefits. Incentivize new development to provide public open space and other amenities as a community benefit.
8. Outdoor Dining. Encourage outdoor dining for restaurants and cafes along the pedestrian right-of-way of streets and in public spaces.
20 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.3.4 A SAFE AND COMFORTABLE PEDESTRIAN AND
CYCLING ENVIRONMENT
The City aims to create a safe, healthy, and active environment for all age groups. Safe and accessible routes should be provided to allow for the comfortable passage of pedestrians and bicyclists, where everyone, including the disabled, seniors, and youth are empowered to be active and mobile.
A wide variety of urban design tools can be utilized to promote a safe and comfortable environment for pedestrians and bicyclists, including the implementation of traffic calming measures, provision of adequate street lighting which can increase safety, the provision of street furniture for respite, bicycle racks and secured bicycle storage, shady street trees, and the use of awnings and pedestrian arcades to enhance building aesthetics and provide utilitarian purpose of comfort and protection from the elements. The implementation of urban design standards which encourage safe and active public pathways, open spaces that encourage “eyes on the street”, traffic managing tools, public infrastructure supporting bicycle use, and ADA accessible pathways will allow all users to be able to circulate safely within the area.
A. Policies
1. Alternate Modes of Transportation. Support land uses and infrastructure improvements which promote alternative modes of transportation, such as transit, walking, or biking.
2. Complete Streets. Design complete streets that emphasize safety and accommodate all modes of travel, including pedestrians and cyclists of all ages and abilities.
3. Active Transportation. Implement active transportation infrastructure that closes gaps in bikeway or pedestrian networks, especially to regional pathways.
4. Pedestrian Orientation. Ensure that all downtown streets are pedestrian-oriented with wide sidewalks, frequent short crosswalks, and other measures to improve pedestrian safety and comfort.
5. Pedestrian Safety. Implement traffic calming features along Bonita Avenue and Arrow Highway to improve pedestrian safety.
6. Lighting. Provide pedestrian-scaled lighting to improve safety and enhance the pedestrian environment along major streets.
7. Shade and Landscaping. Provide a consistent canopy of shade trees and landscaping throughout the Specific Plan area to enhance pedestrian comfort and experience walking on sidewalks.
8. Wayfinding and Signage. Provide clear, human-scale wayfinding and placemaking signage to enhance direction and sense of place for bicyclists and pedestrians.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 21
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.3.5 A RANGE OF HOUSING TYPES
An adequate supply of affordable housing for all income levels is a fundamental need for all communities. San Dimas is known for its welldesigned subdivisions and a mix of semi-rural to suburban neighborhoods.
Additional housing units are needed within the city at large, and the Downtown Specific Plan area contains several housing opportunity sites which are identified in the Housing Element of the General Plan. With the new Metro light rail line, the City has an opportunity to encourage mixeduse and blended-use transit-oriented development projects.
Development pressure for higher density housing is anticipated with the opening of the light rail station. The downtown area can benefit from mixed and blended use projects where the residential component can both provide needed housing units while also infusing people into the downtown area to help support the patronage needed for desired restaurant, retail, and service-based uses.
A. Policies
1. Various Housing Options. Allow for high quality, various range of housing types in the Specific Plan area to meet the needs of current and future residents of all income levels.
2. Housing Near Transit. Encourage new multi-family housing in locations within close proximity to transit.
3. Affordable Housing Near Transit. Allow and encourage the development of affordable housing choices within walking distance of the A Line Station.
4. Design. Provide comprehensive residential design standards and guidelines for new residential and non-residential development.
22 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.3.6 PARKING THAT IS SUPPORTIVE OF NEW USES AND
ACTIVITIES IN DOWNTOWN
The success of Downtown San Dimas will also be contingent upon the availability of parking options for people who are seeking to utilize the amenities and services of the Downtown Specific Plan area. Providing sufficient parking spaces will support various transportation modes, while encouraging and supporting the growth of the local economy. Having sufficient parking spaces, as well as creative parking management strategies, will also be critical in supporting and encouraging the use of the new transit station.
A. Policies
1. Shared Parking Lots. Leverage the City’s existing Downtown Parking District comprised of shared parking lots for businesses in the historic commercial area.
2. Parking Management Strategies. Develop and incorporate parking management strategies around the A Line station that encourage efficient use of parking resources and support programs that can reduce the parking supply needed.
3. Flexible Parking Standards. Implement more accurate and flexible parking standards that reflect the parking demand for the area.
4. Bicycle Parking. Provide opportunities for safe and accessible bicycle parking in the Specific Plan area.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 23
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.3.7 “FIRST/LAST MILE” CONNECTIONS TO TRANSIT
The first/last mile connection describes the distance people must walk, bike, drive, or use another mode of transportation to arrive at the nearest transit station or bus stop and back to people’s dwelling places.
By providing convenient, comfortable and safe access to stations and stops by various modes, more people are encouraged to travel “door-todoor” by using alternative methods to the automobile. Investments in multimodal access, including investments in feeder buses and shuttles, pedestrian paths and bicycle routes connecting to rail stations, bicycle parking and other facilities can help to ensure that major investments in transit infrastructure are as cost-effective, demographically inclusive, and environmentally conscious as possible, while increasing transportation options to the public. First/last mile investments also support economic development and livability goals by ensuring that all destinations are within access of a major transit stop by a variety of means.
A. Policies
1. Multimodal Connectivity. Provide safe and accessible “first/last mile” multimodal connectivity between the future Metro train station and downtown destinations.
2. Pedestrian Connectivity. Improve pedestrian connectivity between the new San Dimas Metro Station and the existing Foothill Transit ParkAnd-Ride lot, which has been purchased by Metro for future A Line station parking.
3. Shared Ride Options. Encourage and facilitate shared-ride options include e-hailing services, microtransit, carshare, and bikeshare.
4. Multimodal Alternatives. Increase awareness of multimodal alternatives to driving to the A Line station.
5. Bicycle Path Connection. Improve bicycle path connections between the Metro A Line Station and other key local and regional destinations, such as Frank G. Bonelli Regional Park.
24 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.3.8 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
The City will support growth that is sustainable for the City’s public infrastructure and overall built environment. The new Metro A Line station with its associated facilities and potential new development should not be a burden to the City’s public infrastructure such as its potable water, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer. The Downtown Specific Plan area shall grow in tandem with the City’s public infrastructure, and be conscientious of its environmental impact and environmental sustainability.
A. Policies
1. Impervious Surfaces. Ensure that new development and the growth of impervious surfaces do not cause undue constraints on the existing stormwater drainage system.
2. Pipeline Infrastructure. Maintain, upgrade, and expand water pipeline, storage, and pumping infrastructure to meet projected domestic, commercial, and fire flow demands for all land uses within the Downtown area.
3. Wastewater. Ensure wastewater in the Downtown area is safely and efficiently conveyed and treated under all demand scenarios, including existing and future average and peak flow sewer scenarios.
4. Stormwater. Maintain a robust stormwater conveyance system that protects the Downtown from flooding impacts and ensures storm flows are efficiently routed to regional drainage.
5. Urban Runoff and Groundwater. Effectively treat all urban runoff and stormwater and ensure that local groundwater supplies and downstream receiving waters are not degraded.
6. Electricity and Natural Gas. Ensure all existing and future Downtown residents and businesses are supplied with safe and cost-efficient electricity and natural gas.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 25
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.4 LAND USE PLAN FRAMEWORK AND
STRATEGIES
The Specific Plan establishes the general type, parameters, and character of the development to foster an integrated downtown and transit-oriented village around the new Metro station. The Specific Plan area’s proximity to freeways, major streets, and light rail infrastructure makes it an ideal place to expand the types and intensities of uses that support the City’s desire to incentivize economic development in San Dimas.
The planning area has been divided into six sub-areas for understanding its existing urban form and character, and potential for change. Characteristics vary among the areas that reflect land use, building scale, architectural style, and other factors. Existing land use conditions and key development strategies are summarized below for each area.
Figure 2.4-1: Regulating Plan
Specific Plan Area Boundary
PLAN AREAS
Gateway Village West
Gateway Village East
Transit Village
Transit Station
Town Core
Public/Semi-Public
Open Space
Housing Element Sites Overlay
“A Line” Light Rail
0 750 1500’
N
57 Fwy
Arrow Hwy
Eucla Ave
Commercial Ave
Acacia St
Cataract Ave
Walnut Ave
Iglesia St
San Dimas Ave
Monte Vista Ave
3rd St
2nd St
1st St
Bonita Ave
Specific Plan Area Boundary
PLAN AREAS
Gateway Village West
Gateway Village East
Transit Village
Town Core
Public/Semi-Public
Open Space
Housing Element Sites Overlay
Transit Station Gold Line Light Rail
N
0 750 1500’
57 Fwy
Arrow Hwy
Eucla Ave
Commercial Ave
Acacia St
Cataract Ave
Walnut Ave
Iglesia St
San Dimas Ave
Monte Vista Ave
3rd St
2nd St
1st St
Bonita Ave
Specific Plan Area Boundary
PLAN AREAS
Gateway Village West
Town Core
Housing Element Sites Overlay
Transit Station A Line Light Rail
N
0 750 1500’
26 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.4.1 TOWN CORE
A. Existing Setting
The Downtown Specific Plan Town Core area is generally bounded by First Street to the north, Commercial Avenue to the south, Acacia Street to the west, and Iglesia Street to the east. The Town Core captures the heart of the community, the historic commercial downtown area along Bonita Avenue between Cataract Avenue and Walnut Avenue. The historic commercial downtown area contains a fine-grained urban form with smaller parcels and buildings close up to the street. The gridded street pattern and street network in the central area of the specific plan area facilitates good pedestrian connectivity and movement in the area. Many of the buildings along Bonita Avenue are historically significant and create an inviting and pleasant streetscape. The wide sidewalks and landscaping along this section of Bonita Avenue create a safe walking environment for pedestrians.
B. Strategy
Throughout multiple community meetings, residents voiced that its historic architecture and small-town charm is its most valuable and defining character of the City. In order to maintain the historic character and small town feel of the Town Core, an emphasis will be placed on preserving and maintaining its historic buildings and ensuring new development is compatible with the scale and architecture of existing structures. An emphasis will be placed on continuing to foster an active, lively downtown core by encouraging uses that generate pedestrian activity and outdoor dining.
General Boundaries:
North – First Street
South – Commercial Avenue
West – Acacia Street
East – Iglesia Street
Character: Preserved historic buildings; walkable, lively downtown.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 27
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.4.2 TRANSIT VILLAGE
A. Existing Setting
The Transit Village area today consists mostly of large commercial and industrial properties with large open parking lots oriented towards the street. The Transit Village area is a prime location for transit supportive mixed use development due to its location to the future A Line transit station and historic commercial core of the City, as evidenced by Grove Station. Grove Station is a well-designed residential and commercial infill development site located east of San Dimas Avenue, north of Arrow Highway, and south of the railroad tracks (south of Bonita Avenue) that fits well into the urban form and character of Downtown San Dimas.
B. Strategy
Development and uses within the Transit Village should capitalize on the location of the new A Line station. The transformation of mostly industrial properties into residential and commercial uses with a pedestrian focus will provide good pedestrian connections to the new transit station and uses in the Town Core area. Creative approaches to parking and providing public spaces/amenities will be vital to transforming this area in the future.
General Boundaries:
North – Bonita Avenue
South – Arrow Highway
East – San Dimas Avenue (generally)
West – Walnut Avenue (generally)
Character: Vibrant, walkable, transit-oriented downtown area.
28 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.4.3 GATEWAY VILLAGE WEST
A. Existing Setting
In contrast to the properties in the Town Core area, the Gateway Village West area has predominantly larger parcels on irregular-shaped block and sizes. Also, most buildings along Bonita Avenue west of Eucla Avenue and east of Walnut Avenue do not face directly to the street and have large surface parking lots. The placement of buildings in this area are more conducive to automobiles than pedestrians.
Gateway Village West is defined by several auto-oriented commercial, office, or industrial uses. These buildings do not relate well to each other or their surrounding context and do not contribute to the public realm. The irregular pattern and siting of buildings, along with vacant and underutilized lots particularly west of Cataract Avenue, result in gaps in development, which in turn, diminishes the public realm. The construction of the A Line rail line bridge at this intersection could have the potential to create an additional visual barrier between the established historic core and the western portion of the specific plan area.
B. Strategy
The Gateway Village West area is envisioned to bring new commercial, entertainment, and residential uses to San Dimas, creating more activity and vibrancy to the area between the historic Town Core and the 57 Freeway. Although auto-oriented today in respect to its urban form, new buildings in the future will be placed closer to the street to help create a more pedestrian-friendly environment along Bonita Avenue. New buildings are likely to be horizontally mixed/blended uses allowing for different building types and forms in the Gateway Village West area.
General Boundaries:
North – Railroad tracks/Proposed A Line
South – Arrow Highway
East – 57 (Orange) Freeway
West – Cataract Avenue
Character: Retail, entertainment, employment, and residential uses, easily accessible by automobiles and pedestrians.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 29
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
C. Illustrative Concept Plan and Perspective Renderings for Opportunity Sites The illustrative concept plan shown in Figure 2-4.2 illustrates how the Gateway Village West area could be developed in the future west of Eucla Avenue, exhibiting a more pedestrian-oriented development character than what exists today. An illustrative concept plan was created for the San Dimas Station North and South properties, which were identified as opportunity sites for new housing in the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element.
Perspective Rendering: Arrow Highway
30 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
Through lot consolidation and development of a unified project at higher residential densities/intensities, this area concept plan offers the potential for increasing residential and commercial uses in the western portion of Downtown. New buildings oriented towards major streets and internal streets with wide sidewalks and outdoor seating, would help promote pedestrian activity along Bonita Avenue and Arrow Highway.
The concept plan and perspective renderings show one way the opportunity sites in the Gateway Village West area could be developed under the development standards and design standards/guidelines of the Specific Plan. This plan is illustrative only; it is not intended to prescribe this particular site layout or use.
Perspective Rendering: Bonita Avenue
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 31
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
Perspective Rendering: Public Plaza
32 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
Figure 2.4-2: Opportunity Sites - Illustrative Concept Plan 0 100’ 400’
NORTH SITE TOTAL
535 +/- DWELLING UNITS
(34.5 DU/ ACRE)
86K SQFT RETAIL
105K SQFT HOTEL
(150 +/- ROOMS)
COMMERCIAL RETAIL BUILDINGS HOTEL
W Cienega Ave
W Bonita Ave
Arrow Hwy
Orange Fwy
S Eucla Ave
MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL
2 level parking podium
1 level subterranean parking
(serves hotel and street retail)
MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL
3/4 floors
2 level parking podium
MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL
3/4 floors
2 level parking podium
SOUTH SITE TOTAL
505+/- DWELLING UNITS
(44.7 DU/ ACRE)
28K SQFT RETAIL
6K COMMUNITY SPACE
COMMERCIAL RETAIL BUILDINGS
MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL
4 floors
2 level parking podium
1 level subterranean or
semi- subterranean parking
MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL
4/5 floors
2 level parking podium
1 level subterranean or
semi- subterranean parking
MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL
4/5 floors
2 level parking podium
1 level subterranean or
semi- subterranean parking
COMMUNITY BUILDING
Arrow Hwy
rooftop deck
rooftop deck
rooftop deck
rooftop deck
rooftop deck
rooftop deck rooftop deck
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 33
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
Figure 2.4-3: Aerial Perspective View Looking South
34 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.4.4 GATEWAY VILLAGE EAST
A. Existing Setting
Gateway Village East is generally bounded by single-family residential uses to the north, railroad tracks to the south, City Hall to the west, and single-family residential uses to the east. Gateway Village East is defined by several uses including residential uses, a preschool, and excess undeveloped federal land adjacent to the USDA Forestry Services building.
B. Strategy
The uses for the Gateway Village East area in the future will consist of a mix of residential and commercial uses with some intuitional uses such as churches and schools. This area will provide new housing opportunities (such as townhomes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) in close proximity to the civic center and new Metro light rail station.
New buildings will be designed to be compatible in the scale and form when adjacent to existing single-family residential homes to the north and east of the specific plan boundaries.
General Boundaries:
North – Single-family residential
South – Railroad/A Line tracks
East – S. Gaffney Avenue
West – Walnut Avenue
Character: Mix of uses that are compatible with neighboring residential and public/ quasi-public uses.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 35
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.4.5 PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC
A. Existing Setting
The Public/Semi Public zone is the cultural and civic center of the City of San Dimas. This is where most of the existing governmental and cultural uses are located today, including San Dimas City Hall, the San Dimas Public Library, Senior Center, Post Office, Police Station, and Fire Station. This area also includes the a USDA Forestry Services property, which has over five acres of underutilized land that has potential for new development.
B. Strategy
The Public/Semi-Public zone is a critical component of creating a true downtown with civic uses and activities. The strategy for this area is to maintain and build upon its existing government uses and cultural amenities. Maintaining and expanding on these facilities beyond their walls will be crucial to creating a vibrant Downtown.
General Boundaries:
Generally located in vicinity of Bonita Avenue and Walnut Avenue.
Character: Civic and public-serving uses; semi-public uses such as schools.
36 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
VISION, DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK, AND STRATEGIES
CHAPTER 2
2.4.6 OPEN SPACE
A. Existing Setting
Pockets of land have been dedicated for open space for the public, including Pioneer Park, Rhoads Park, and Civic Center Park. These open spaces are a welcome reprieve for the downtown area, and provide a location for community activities and recreation for the City.
B. Strategy
The Open Space sites promote, protect, and preserve for open space and the preservation of natural resources, as well as for outdoor recreation, education, and public health and safety. Examples of uses for this area include active and passive parks, as well as outdoor plazas with seating.
The Land Use Plan, along with development standards and design guidelines, build upon the strengths of each area described above. Chapter 5: Design Standards and Guidelines provides a framework for the Downtown’s public improvements, site design, and building architecture.
SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 3:
ZONING AND LAND USE
3.1 Chapter Overview................................................................38
3.2 Applicability.........................................................................38
3.3 Zoning Designations............................................................38
3.4 Allowable Land Uses ...........................................................42
38 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
3.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW
The zoning and land use regulations in this chapter are intended to guide development and decision making to achieve the vision of the DTSP. While broad land use categories are assigned in the General Plan, the DTSP establishes a detailed list of allowed land uses and permit requirements for each zone within the plan area.
This chapter is organized into the following sections:
• 3.1 Chapter Overview
• 3.2 Applicability
• 3.3 Zoning Designations
• 3.4 Allowable Land Uses
3.2 APPLICABILITY
The applicability of the DTSP land use regulations and development standards are organized by zone and plan chapters (Table 3.2-1). Where the standards do not apply, the relevant sections of the San Dimas Municipal Code (SDMC) is referenced.
3.3 ZONING DESIGNATIONS
The Regulating Plan shown in Figure 3.3-1 shall serve as the zoning map for Downtown San Dimas. It designates the zones and overlays that apply to each site within Downtown San Dimas.
The Downtown Specific Plan area is divided into six (6) different zones:
Gateway Village West, Transit Village, Gateway Village East, Town Core, Public/Semi-Public, and Open Space. A Housing Element Sites Overlay is also utilized. Each zoning area is described below and contains its own distinctive set of allowable land uses, development standards, and design standards and guidelines.
Permitted land uses for each zone are described in Section 3.4 of this Chapter. Development standards for new development and redevelopment within the plan area are provided within Chapter 4 of this Specific Plan.
Design standards and guidelines are provided for in Chapter 5 of this Specific Plan.
Zone
Specific Plan Chapters
Vision
Zoning and Land
Use
Development
Standards
Design Standards
and Guidelines
2 3 4 5
Gateway Village West
Transit Village
Gateway Village East
Town Core
Public/Semi-Public 18.132
Open Space 18.124
Table 3.2-1: Applicable Specific Plan Chapters
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 39
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
Figure 3.3-1: Regulating Plan
57 Fwy
Arrow Hwy
Eucla Ave
Commercial Ave
Acacia St
Cataract Ave
Walnut Ave
Iglesia St
San Dimas Ave
Monte Vista Ave
3rd St
2nd St
1st St
Bonita Ave
Specific Plan Area Boundary
PLAN AREAS
Gateway Village West
Gateway Village East
Transit Village
Town Core
Public/Semi-Public
Open Space
Housing Element Sites Overlay
Transit Station “A Line” Light Rail
N
0 750 1500’
40 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
3.3.1 GATEWAY VILLAGE WEST
The Gateway Village West area is envisioned as a prime redevelopment area that could help bring more activity and vibrancy to Downtown San Dimas. Buildings are likely to be horizontally mixed/blended uses allowing for different building types and forms.
This would allow for flexibility and creativity in integrating residential and commercial uses within projects. Commercial and open space amenities would be required in new residential developments to serve the future residents and the community at large.
3.3.2 TRANSIT VILLAGE
The Transit Village area is a special zone focused on station-adjacent parcels and blocks.
The Transit Village concept should build upon the success of the existing Grove Station project, and new development and redevelopment is encouraged to incorporate similar site design, building form, and architectural elements. Development standards within the zone will allow for higher density than the Town Core area to capitalize on the proximity to the future transit station.
3.3.3 GATEWAY VILLAGE EAST
The Gateway Village East area marks the eastern entrance into the downtown area. A transitional area that spans from the eastern boundary of downtown towards the civic uses concentrated near the intersection of Bonita and Walnut Avenues, the Gateway Village East area contains established uses as well as undeveloped and underutilized sites, which present valuable development and redevelopment opportunities. As this zone abuts established residential uses to the north and east, thoughtful and anticipatory development standards and design guidelines have been developed in Chapters 4 and 5 to ensure that new development is compatible with existing surrounding uses.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 41
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
3.3.4 TOWN CORE
The Town Core area contains the traditional, historic downtown segment of the specific plan area. New development and redevelopment projects are required to retain and reflect the historic feel and scale of the buildings along Bonita Avenue in the historic heart of downtown, generally from Cataract Avenue to San Dimas Avenue. Preservation, rehabilitation, and adaptive re-use of historic buildings is strongly encouraged. Pedestrianoriented uses are encouraged on ground floor street frontages. Building form and site design are to match the historic town core. Commercial vernacular building styles and traditional mixed-use building concepts should be implemented. Maximum setbacks are encouraged to enhance the pedestrian experience. New development or redevelopment within the Town Core is to be architecturally compatible with the existing historic buildings within the area.
3.3.5 PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC
The Public/Semi-Public zone distinguishes sites designated for public and semi-public uses for the growth and general welfare of the city as a whole. The zone allows for joint use and joint development opportunities between public, semipublic, and private uses.
3.3.6 OPEN SPACE
The Open Space zone designates sites to promote, protect, and preserve for open space and the preservation of natural resources, for outdoor recreation and education, and for public health and safety.
3.3.7 HOUSING ELEMENT SITES OVERLAY
The Housing Element Sites Overlay is intended to identify sites within the City where multi-family housing may be established and maintained in compliance with this Specific Plan. The overlay serves to execute the General Plan Housing Element Implementation Plan by designating adequate sites to accommodate the City’s assigned housing need as identified in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The Regulating Plan designates sites with the overlay to accommodate the RHNA for the current Housing Element period. In addition to the uses allowed within the underlying zone, each property designated with a Multi-Family Overlay shall be developed with a residential component (market-rate or affordable) subject to the minimum residential densities prescribed in the current Housing Element.
42 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
3.4 ALLOWABLE LAND USES
3.4.1 ENTITLEMENT OPTIONS
The following section addresses allowable uses and
entitlement requirements within the plan area. Certain
uses may be subject to special conditions regarding
the location, operation, design, or special permitting
requirements of the use. Following an application
submittal, the Director of Community Development
or his/her designee shall make a determination as to
whether the proposed use is permitted, permitted with
a Minor Conditional Use Permit, conditionally permitted, prohibited, or allowed as a temporary use.
Allowed land uses within the San Dimas Downtown Specific Plan are listed in Table 3.4-2 which starts on the following page. Entitlement options for permitted land uses are
provided for in Table 3.4-1. Section 3.4.2 and Chapter 8, Administration describe provisions for unclassified uses and similar use determinations.
Land Use Table Key - Entitlement Options
Permitted P
Minor Conditional Use Permit MCUP
Conditional Use Permit CUP
Upper Floor / Not on Key Street Frontage Use. (Addendum to above classifications indicating use may be allowable on the second story or above, or on the ground floor if not abutting Bonita Avenue or San Dimas Avenue street frontages. NKSF = Not Key Street Frontage) (2/NKSF)
See SDMC for Temporary Uses
Table 3.4-1: Land Use Table Key
(P) designates a permitted use that is allowed without discretionary approval. (MCUP) designates a use which requires discretionary approval through a Minor Conditional Use Permit, subject to the requirements outlined in Chapter 8 of this specific plan.
(CUP) designates a use which requires discretionary approval through a Conditional Use Permit, subject to the requirements outlined in SDMC.
(2/NKSF) designates an addendum to the above classifications indicating a use may be allowable on the second story or above, or on the ground floor if not abutting Bonita Avenue or San Dimas Avenue street frontages.
Temporary Uses are not provided for in the land use table but are permitted within the plan area subject to the standards and requirements of SDMC.
Land uses that are not listed or not labeled “P”, “MCUP” or “CUP” are not permitted.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 43
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
3.4.2 SIMILAR USE DETERMINATIONS
Since it is not possible to list every land use, or to anticipate every land use that might be proposed in the future, the Director of Community Development or his/her designee may determine a use is substantially similar to those provided for in the land use table and may be treated the same way as a listed use through a Similar Use Determination as outlined in Chapter 8.4.2 of this Specific Plan.
3.4.3 LAND USE TABLE
Table 3.4-2: Allowable Land Uses (next five pages)
Allowable Land Uses
Land Use Types
Gateway
Village
West
Transit
Village
Gateway
Village East
Town
Core
Public/
Semi
-Public
Open
Space Notes
Residential Uses
Multi-Family Residential P(2/NKSF) P(2/NKSF) P P(2/NKSF) - - Residential Care/Assisted Living
Facilities - - CUP -
Single-Room Occupancy Units CUP CUP CUP CUP - -
Transitional and Supportive Housing P P P P - -
See SDMC or ADUs/JADUs and Residenital Home Care Facilities Commercial Uses
Retail and Service
Alcohol Sales for Off-Site Consumption
when accessory to a permitted retail
use of a minimum of 10,000 square
feet of floor area
CUP CUP CUP CUP - -
Bar, Lounge, or Night Club CUP CUP - CUP - -
Grocery Stores P P P P - -
44 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
Allowable Land Uses
Land Use Types
Gateway
Village
West
Transit
Village
Gateway
Village East
Town
Core
Public/
Semi
-Public
Open
Space Notes
Commercial Uses
Retail and Service (continued)
Gyms and Personal Fitness Facilities
which are greater than 5,000 square
feet in gross floor area
CUP CUP - - - -
Hotels CUP CUP - - - -
Maintenance and Repair Services, NonAutomotive (including but not limited to computers, phones, furniture, household
appliances, personal goods, musical
instruments, and similar)
P(2/NKSF) P(2/NKSF) P(2/NKSF) P(2/NKSF)
Outdoor Dining, Public and Private P P P P - -
Subject to Staff review
if on private property
and/or encroachment
permit from Public Works
Department if located
within the public right-ofway.
Personal services (including but not
limited to hair and beauty salons,
cleaners and laundries, and similar)
P P P P - -
Pet Boarding and Day Care MCUP MCUP MCUP MCUP - -
Pet Stores and Services, including
animal and related product sales,
grooming, and veterinary services
P P P P - -
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 45
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
Allowable Land Uses
Land Use Types
Gateway
Village
West
Transit
Village
Gateway
Village East
Town
Core
Public/
Semi
-Public
Open
Space Notes
Commercial Uses
Retail and Service (continued)
Restaurants, Fast Food/Fast Casual P P P P - -
With Alcohol Service MCUP MCUP MCUP MCUP - -
Restaurants, Sit Down P P P P - -
With Alcohol Service MCUP MCUP MCUP MCUP - -
With Live Entertainment MCUP MCUP MCUP MCUP - -
Retail Pharmacies P P P P - -
Food Halls and Markets with a
minimum of 75% of floor area
dedicated to food-related uses
MCUP MCUP - MCUP - -
Up to 25% of floor area
may be used for retail
sales of goods.
Specialty Food Stores (including but
not limited to coffee shops, ice cream
stores, juice bars, and similar)
P P P P - -
Studios (including but not limited
to dance, gymnastics, health and
exercise, martial arts, music, personal
training, photography, pilates,
yoga and similar) which are up to a
maximum size of 5,000 square feet of
gross floor area
P P P P - -
Permitted by right when
not adjacent to residential
uses that are contained
within the same mixed
use development project
as the studio. If located
within a mixed-use project
and adjacent to residential
uses within said project,
a MCUP is required as
shown below
46 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
Allowable Land Uses
Land Use Types
Gateway
Village
West
Transit
Village
Gateway
Village
East
Town
Core
Public/
Semi
-Public
Open
Space Notes
Commercial Uses
Retail and Service (continued)
Studios (including but not limited to dance, gymnastics, health and exercise, martial arts, music, personal training, photography, pilates, yoga and similar) which are up to a maximum size of 5,000 square feet of gross floor area and when located within a mixed-use development project and adjacent to residential uses
MCUP MCUP MCUP MCUP - -
Specialty Retail Stores (including but not limited to appliances, books, clothing, furniture, hardware, home goods, jewelry, music, sporting goods, toys, and similar)
P P P P - -
Commercial Uses
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly
Childcare and Adultcare Centers - - MCUP - - -
Commercial Recreational and Social Experiences, Indoor
(including but not limited to art courses, bowling alleys, cooking classes, escape rooms, laser tag, trampoline parks, and similar)
P P P P - -
Entertainment and Performance Establishments (including but not limited to live performing arts theaters, concert halls, comedy clubs, movie theaters, and similar)
CUP CUP - CUP - -
Museums, Art Galleries and Working Studios, and similar Cultural Institutions P P P P P -
Private Schools (Pre-school through High School) - - CUP - - - Religious Institutions and Churches CUP(2/
NKSF)
CUP(2/
NKSF)
CUP(2/
NKSF)
CUP(2/
NKSF) - -
Social Clubs, Lodges, Event Centers, Private Meeting Halls CUP CUP - CUP - -
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 47
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
Allowable Land Uses
Land Use Types
Gateway
Village
West
Transit
Village
Gateway
Village East
Town
Core
Public/
Semi
-Public
Open
Space Notes
Commercial Uses
Office, Medical, Professional, and Business Support
Automated Teller Machines (ATMs)
(not drive-thru) P P P P - - Subject to Staff site plan review Banks and Financial Services P P P P - -
With Drive Thru Service - - - - - -
Business Support Services (including
but not limited to print shops, mail
centers, and similar)
P P P P - -
Professional Offices- Medical and
Dental (including but not limited
to compounding pharmacies,
laboratories, and similar)
P(2/NKSF) P(2/NKSF) P(2/NKSF) P(2/NKSF) - -
Professional Offices- Non-Medical
and Dental (including but not
limited to administrative, business,
corporate, sales, and similar)
P P(2/NKSF) P P(2/NKSF) - -
Urgent Medical Care P(2/NKSF) P(2/NKSF) - - - -
Manufacturing and Industrial Uses
Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing
(micro-brewery, micro-winery,
micro-distillery) with tastings and
retail sales. Live entertainment may
also be provided.
MCUP MCUP - MCUP - -
Incidental food trucks and
related outdoor activities
may also be permitted
through the MCUP process
subject to site plan review
and approval.
48 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
ZONING AND LAND USE
CHAPTER 3
Allowable Land Uses
Land Use Types
Gateway
Village
West
Transit
Village
Gateway
Village East
Town
Core
Public/
Semi
-Public
Open
Space Notes
Manufacturing and Industrial Uses (continued)
Artisan Production/Hand-Crafted
Maker Spaces with Retail Sales
(including but not limited to ceramics,
jewelry, furniture, glassware, pottery,
textiles, and similar)
P P P P - -
Research and Development - P - - - -
Permitted only when
located on Arrow Highway
frontage
Other Uses
Home-Based Businesses P P P P - - See SDMC
Public Uses and Utilities P P P P P -
Parks, Plazas, and Open Space P P P P P P
Transit-Serving Facilities, including
Transit Hubs, Park and Ride Lots, and
Commercial Parking Structures
CUP CUP - CUP CUP -
Uses permitted under SDMC
(Public/Semi-Public) - - - - P -
Uses conditinally permitted under
SDMC (Public/Semi-Public) - - - - CUP -
Uses permitted under SDMC
(Open Space) - - - - - P
Uses conditionally permitted under
SDMC (Open Space) - - - - - CUP
SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 4:
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
4.1 Purpose and General Provisions.........................................50
4.2 Regulating Plan....................................................................50
4.3 Development Standards......................................................52
4.4 Development Incentives for the Provision of
Bonus Public Parking in the Gateway Village
West Area ............................................................................76
50 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
4.1 PURPOSE AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
4.1.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT
A. Purpose
The development standards in this chapter are requirements that address aspects of land use, site development, and building design that are essential to achieve the overall Downtown Vision. They are precise specifications for such things as building height, setbacks, open space, and parking.
B. Intent
The Development Code is intended to work together with the design standards and guidelines contained in Chapter 5 to ensure that all use of property, including new development, creates high-quality architecture, promotes a more environmentally and economically sustainable downtown, encourages an active pedestrian-scaled environment, and provides connections and appropriate transitions between Downtown Areas.
4.1.2 APPLICABILITY
A. Downtown San Dimas Specific Plan Area
The requirements of this chapter apply within the area shown in the Regulating Plan in Figure 3-1. This area is referred to in this chapter as “Downtown San Dimas.”
B. Compliance with Standards
All sites, structures, and uses within Downtown San Dimas shall comply with the requirements of this chapter and the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code as adopted by the City of San Dimas.
C. Precedence
In addition to the requirements of this Specific Plan, all projects shall comply with the San Dimas Municipal Code (SDMC). In the event of a conflict between the City Zoning Ordinance (SDMC Title 18 – Zoning) and this specific plan, the provisions of this chapter shall govern. Any issue not specifically covered in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the regulations in the Zoning Ordinance and/or San Dimas Municipal Code (SDMC). The Director of Community Development may interpret the provisions of the Specific Plan on issues not specifically covered in the City’s existing regulations in accordance with Chapter 8 (Administration).
4.1.3 ADMINISTRATION
Compliance with the use and development standards in this chapter, in addition to the design standards and guidelines in Chapter 5, and other policies and regulations of this Specific Plan, shall be verified through the application and review procedures defined in Chapter 8 (Administration).
4.2 REGULATING PLAN
The Regulating Plan was introduced and described in Chapter 3 and is also included for ease of reference in this Chapter via Figure 4.2-1 on the next page. It designates the zones that apply to each site within Downtown San Dimas. Reference Chapter 3 for a description of each of the zones within the Specific Plan area and for permitted land uses.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 51
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
Figure 4.2-1: Regulating Plan
57 Fwy
Arrow Hwy
Eucla Ave
Commercial Ave
Acacia St
Cataract Ave
Walnut Ave
Iglesia St
San Dimas Ave
Monte Vista Ave
3rd St
2nd St
1st St
Bonita Ave
Specific Plan Area Boundary
PLAN AREAS
Gateway Village West
Gateway Village East
Transit Village
Town Core
Public/Semi-Public
Open Space
Housing Element Sites Overlay
Transit Station “A Line” Light Rail
N
0 750 1500’
52 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
4.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Table 4.3-1 below provides abbreviated development standards by zone that shall apply to all new development and redevelopment projects within the plan area. Full development standards follow in Sections 4.3.1 through 4.3.4 of this Chapter, except for development standards for the Open Space and Public/Semi-Public zones, which are are contained within the San Dimas Municipal Code. Permitted land uses for all zones are described in Chapter 3, Zoning and Land Use, and permit processes are described in Chapter 8, Administration. Design standards and guidelines are provided within Chapter
5. Table 4.3-1: Summary of Development Standards
Standard Gateway Village
West Transit Village Gateway VillageEast Town Core
Scale
Allowable Density
Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre 45* 40 35 30
Note: Minimum and Maximum densities for Housing Element Sites within the Housing Element Sites Overlay shall be consistent with the Housing Element. Density on these sites may exceed the maximum allowable density of the base underlying zone Allowable Intensity
Maximum Floor Area Ratio 2.0* 1.75 1.75 1.5
Note: FAR includes residential and commercial building floor area but excludes structured parking areas Maximum Number of Stories Above Grade
Mixed Use (Commercial Ground Floor) 4 stories* 4 stories 3 stories 3 stories Multi-Family Residential (Residential Ground Floor) 4 stories* 4 stories 3 stories 3 stories Commercial/Office 3 stories 3 stories 2 stories 2 stories Hotels 4 stories 4 stories N/A N/A
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 53
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
Standard Gateway Village
West Transit Village Gateway VillageEast Town Core
Scale (continued)
Maximum Building Height
Mixed Use (Commercial Ground Floor) 55’* 55’ 45’ 35’
Multi-Family Residential (Residential Ground Floor) 48’* 48’ 36’ 36’ Commercial 30’* 30’ 30’ 30’
Hotels 55’* 55’ 45’ 45’
Notes: Maximums above are for building plate height. Pitched roofs are permitted to extend 8’ beyond the maximum permitted. Parapets are permitted to extend 4’ beyond the maximum permitted.
* Exceptions provided for developments which provide bonus public parking in accordance with Section 4.3 Required Setbacks
Bonita Avenue and San Dimas Avenue
10' minimum west
of Eucla,
5' minimum east of
Eucla
25’ maximum
5' maximum;
0' minimum 10' minimum 5' maximum; 0' minimum
Other streets 10' minimum
25’ maximum
15' maximum;
0' minimum 10' minimum 5' maximum; 0' minimum
Other interiors which are commercial adjacent None required Interior adjacent to single-family residential zoning districts 20' minimum for commercial and mixed-use projects; 15' minimum for residential projects
Required Stepbacks See narrative in Development Standards Section 4.3.1(F) and Tables 4.3-2, 4.3-3, and 4.3-4
Required Modulation
Length 150' 100' 100' 70'
Development Sited on or Adjacent to Buildings on City's Historic Inventory List N/A See narrative in Design Standards and Guidelines Section 5.10 Table 4.3-1: Summary of Development Standards (continued)
54 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
Standard Gateway Village
West Transit Village Gateway VillageEast Town Core
Frontage
Ground Floor Dimensions
Building Facing Street Frontages - Non-Residential
Ground Floor Height 14' minimum 14' minimum 14' minimum 14' minimum Residential Ground Floor Height 10' minimum 10' minimum 10' minimum 10' minimum Commercial Depth 35’ minimum,
45' average
35’ minimum,
45’ average
35’ minimum,
45’ average
35’ minimum,
45’ average
Minimum Transparency See narrative in Development Standards Section 4.3.2(B) and Table 4.3-6 Required Shade Structures See narrative in Development Standards Section 4.3.2(C) Open Space
Minimum Area
Residential Units 150 sf per unit
Non-Residential For projects over 40,000 sf, minimum of 5% of non-residential building floor area required Publicly Accessible Open Space Required for projects over 80,000 sf. See Sections 4.3.3(B)2 and 4.3.3(E) and reference Table 4.3-8
Parking
Minimum Parking, Vehicle Access, Layout & Design See provisions in Development Standards Section 4.3.6 Other Applicable Standards
Density Bonus See SDMC and Government Code Section 65915 Landscaping See SDMC
Parking & Loading See Section 4.3.4 and SDMC
Signs See SDMC
Permitted Land Uses See Table 4.3-2 in Chapter 3, Zoning and Land Use Table 4.3-1: Summary of Development Standards (continued)
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 55
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
4.3.1 SCALE
Purpose. These standards are intended to:
• Implement density (du/acre) and floor area ratio values. • Shape development in a manner that creates a defined public realm and appropriate scale of buildings for a visually appealing downtown. • Reduce building massing through setback and stepback requirements that create appropriate transitions from Bonita Avenue and to residential neighborhoods.
• Support high-quality architecture and urban design through modulation requirements and variation in façade length.
• Encourage appropriate transitions to historic buildings in the Town Core.
A. Density - Residential
Projects that include residential dwelling units shall not exceed the allowable dwelling units per acre as specified in Table 4.3-1. Achievement of the maximum development intensity cited in the table is not guaranteed; the actual yield of any development will be determined based upon site-specific physical characteristics and compliance with the development code and the design standards and guidelines.
Sites designated as Housing Element Sites Overlay shall yield a minimum density as prescribed within the Housing Element.
1. Fractions shall be rounded to the nearest whole number; those at 0.50 shall be rounded up.
2. The maximum is based on net project area after any dedications are provided.
3. For projects utilizing state density bonus, refer to SDMC and Government Code Section 65195.
B. Intensity - Floor Area Ratio
Projects that include non-residential space, including mixed-use, shall not exceed the allowable floor area as specified in Table 4.3-1.
1. In mixed-use projects, residential floor area is included in the FAR.
2. The maximum is based on net project area after any dedications are provided.
C. Number of Stories
Buildings shall not exceed the maximum number of stories above grade as specified in Table 4.3-1.
Example of Existing Two-Story Buildings in the Specific Plan Area
56 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
D. Height - Building Height
Buildings shall not exceed the height limits as specified in Table 4.3-1. Pitched roofs are permitted to extend 8 feet beyond the maximum permitted. Parapets are permitted to extend 4 feet beyond the maximum permitted.
1. Height means the vertical distance from the grade to plate height.
2. Maximum height for massing adjacent to street or interior property lines may be limited by required stepbacks; see Section F of this Chapter.
3. Exceptions are allowed for projecting features such as elevator shafts, mechanical equipment screens, appurtenances, and railings at the discretion of the reviewing body through site plan review.
E. Setbacks
1. Street Setbacks. Buildings shall comply with the street setbacks set in Table 4.3-1.
Setback ranges establish a minimum and maximum for the specified percentage of linear street frontage.
a. Street setbacks are measured from the property line. b. Minimum setbacks shall apply to all stories of a building; setbacks less than the minimum are prohibited. Maximum setbacks shall apply only to the ground floor. c. Residential units on the ground floor on street frontages shall be subject to the underlying zone per Table 4.3-1, but in no case shall residential units be setback less than 5 feet, or less than 8 feet when elevated between 4 and 6 feet above sidewalk elevation; whichever setback requirement is greatest shall prevail. d. Exceptions for arcades and recessed ground floors up to 15 feet in depth, as well as parking entrances per 4.3.6, are allowed when a second story meets the specific setback at the discretion of the reviewing body through site plan review. e. Features allowed within the street setback include:
i. Landscaping and planters;
ii. Hardscape such as stoops and patios;
iii. Arcades and galleries per Section 4.3.2(E);
iv. Walls and fences per Section 4.3.2(G);
v. Seating and furniture;
Example of an Existing 3-story Building in the Region
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 57
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
vi. Outdoor dining; and
vii. Other open space amenities at the discretion of the Director of Community Development.
2. Interior Setbacks. Buildings shall comply with the interior setbacks set in Table 4.3-1 when adjacent to single-family residential zones. No interior setback is required when adjacent to other zones.
a. Interior setbacks are those abutting other parcels (non-street side and rear) and are measured from the shared property line.
F. Stepbacks
Building stepbacks of a minimum depth of 12 feet from the floor below shall be provided as prescribed below for buildings fronting Bonita Avenue and San Dimas Avenue, buildings fronting other streets, and buildings which are adjacent to single-family residential zoning districts. Uses allowed within the street setback include private open space (terraces), shade structures (trellises), green roofs, and other open space features at the discretion of the Director of Community Development.
1. Street Stepbacks on Bonita and San Dimas Avenue. Third and fourth floors of buildings sited along Bonita Avenue and San Dimas Avenue shall provide a minimum stepback depth of 12 feet from the floor below for a minimum of 70 percent of the building frontage as specified in Table 4.3-2 below. Bonita Avenue and San Dimas Avenue stepbacks are for those building faces which abut Bonita Avenue and San Dimas Avenue.
Building Setbacks. Building on right is setback
approximately 10-15’ from property line.
Project Type Gateway Village West and Transit Village Gateway Village East and Town Core 3rd Floor 4th Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor
Mixed Use 12' from 2nd floor 12’ from 3rd floor 12' from 2nd floor N/A Nonresidential 12' from 2nd floor 12’ from 3rd floor 12' from 2nd floor N/A Residential 12' from 2nd floor 12’ from 3rd floor 12' from 2nd floor N/A Table 4.3-2: Required Minimum Street Stepbacks (for Minimum 70 Percent of Building Frontage) on Buildings Adjacent to Bonita Avenue and San Dimas Avenue
58 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
2. Street Stepbacks on Other Streets. Third and fourth floors of buildings sited along street frontages other than Bonita Avenue and San Dimas Avenue shall provide a minimum stepback depth of 12 feet from the floor below for a minimum of 50 percent of the building frontage as specified in Table 4.3-3 below. Street stepbacks are for those building faces which abut public rights-of-way.
Project Type Gateway Village West and Transit Village Gateway Village East and Town Core 3rd Floor 4th Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor
Mixed Use 12’ from 2nd floor Not required 12' from 2nd floor N/A Nonresidential 12’ from 2nd floor Not required 12' from 2nd floor N/A Residential 12’ from 2nd floor Not required 12' from 2nd floor N/A Table 4.3-3: Required Minimum Street Stepbacks (for Minimum 50 Percent of Building Frontage) on Buildings Adjacent to Other Street Frontages
3. Interior Stepbacks Adjacent to Single-Family Residential Zoning Districts. Third and fourth floors of buildings sited adjacent to single-family residential zoning districts shall provide a minimum stepback depth of 12 feet from the floor below as specified in Table 4.3-4 below.
Project Type Gateway Village West and Transit Village Gateway Village East and Town Core 3rd Floor 4th Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor
Mixed Use 12’ from 2nd floor 12’ from 3rd floor 12’ from 2nd floor N/A Nonresidential 12’ from 2nd floor 12’ from 3rd floor 12’ from 2nd floor N/A Residential 12’ from 2nd floor 12’ from 3rd floor 12’ from 2nd floor N/A Table 4.3-4: Required Minimum Interior Stepbacks for Buildings Adjacent to Single-Family Residential Zoning Districts
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 59
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
Examples of 3rd Floor Stepbacks
60 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
Figure 4.3-1: Upper Floor Stepbacks
52’ maximum
12’ maximum
12’ maximum
12’ maximum
16’ maximum
Public Street
12’ minimum
stepback
4 story building with 3rd and 4th floors stepped back
40’ maximum
12’ maximum
12’ maximum
16’ maximum
Public Street
12’ minimum
stepback
3 story building with 3rd floor stepped back from street frontage 40’ maximum
12’ maximum
12’ maximum
16’ maximum 15’ minimum
setback
Property
Line
Single-Family
Residential
Zoning
12’ minimum
stepback
3 story building with 3rd floor stepped back adjacent to single-family residential zones
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 61
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
G. Building Modulation
1. Façade Length. Each street-facing façade exceeding the length set in Table 4.3-5 shall include a minimum break of 10 percent of the façade length or 20 feet, whichever is greater. This break shall be a minimum of 10 feet deep and open to the sky; see Figure 4.3-2.
Façade Gateway
Village West
Transit
Village
Gateway
Village East Town Core
Length 150' 100' 100' 70'
Table 4.3-5: Modulation - Length
Figure 4.3-2. Façade Length
Unbroken
façade length
Façade break
Min. 10’
Min. 10% of façade
or 20’
62 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
4.3.2 FRONTAGES
These standards are intended to:
• Promote a consistency of character between varying land uses, buildings, and zones;
• Create and build connectivity between the historic Town Core and the expanded Downtown area;
• Increase visibility into ground floor uses to create visual interest for pedestrians;
• Limit blank walls on the ground floor to enhance visual interest and pedestrian comfort;
• Promote shade through arcades and shade structures; and • Prioritize pedestrian access by ensuring doorways are open to a public sidewalk or public open space.
A. Ground Floor
1. Height. Buildings facing street frontages shall have a minimum nonresidential ground floor height of 14 feet. The minimum height of residential ground floor spaces shall be 10 feet. The height shall be measured from the sidewalk elevation to second-story floor or roof of a one-story building.
2. Depth. Commercial uses shall have an average interior depth of at least 45 feet and a minimum depth of 35 feet.
B. Transparency
1. Windows and Doors. Minimum transparency for street-facing facades is set in Table 4.3-6.
a. For non-residential and residential common space uses, ground floor transparency is measured at the percentage of building frontage that consists of transparent openings between a height of 2 feet and 10 feet above sidewalk elevation. All other transparency is measured as the percentage of façade area, viewed in elevation. b. Windows shall be recessed or projecting by a minimum of 2 inches from the façade. Flush windows may be allowed with approval of the Development Plan Review Board provided that the Board finds that they result in no negative impact on the total architectural quality of the building.
c. Clear glass is the only acceptable glazing color. The use of tinted, mirrored, or highly reflective glazing is prohibited.
d. Drapes, posters, and shelving of product displays visible to the public right-of-way shall obscure a maximum of 30 percent of the transparent areas of each respective storefront.
2. Blank Building Walls. Windowless expanses of street-facing walls shall not exceed 20 feet in length.
3. Security Bars. Security bars are discouraged. Any interior security bars shall be designed to be fully hidden from view during business hours with devices such as concealed side pockets and ceiling cavities.
Non-Residential
and Residential
Common Space
Gateway
Village
West
Transit
Village
Gateway
Village
East
Town
Core
Ground Floor 50% 70% 30% 70%
Overall Façade 15% 30% 15% 30%
Table 4.3-6: Transparency for Non-Residential Uses and Residential Common Space
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 63
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
C. Shade Structures
Shade structures, including but not limited to awnings and canopies, are encouraged throughout the plan area and required on buildings with frontages on Bonita Avenue, with exceptions listed in item 5 below.
For more specific design standards for shade structures, please refer to Chapter 5.6.8.
1. On buildings which front Bonita Avenue, shade structures are required and shall project a minimum of 5 feet and up to a maximum of 8 feet into the public right-of-way for a minimum of 50 percent of the building frontage. Both Planning Division review and approval and an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department are required.
2. On all other street frontages, shade structures may project up to twothirds of the sidewalk width, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division and the approval of an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department.
3. Shade structures shall allow a minimum of 8 feet of vertical clearance from sidewalk elevation.
4. Shade structures shall not conflict with existing trees.
5. Shade structures are not required where an arcade or recessed ground floor provides a minimum depth of 5 feet of covered and unobstructed pedestrian clearance.
D. Arcades
1. Any arcades shall be located behind the minimum setback.
2. Arcades shall be a minimum of 8 feet from back of column to building façade.
3. The distance between columns shall be equal to or greater than the arcade depth dimension, as measured from the column center.
4. The façade shall meet the ground floor transparency requirements set forth in 4.3.2(B).
5. Uses allowed within arcades include:
a. Pedestrian travel;
b. Seating/street furniture;
c. Outdoor dining;
d. Landscape planters; and
e. Bicycle parking.
E. Walls, Fences, and Hedges
1. Within required street setbacks. Walls, fences, raised planters, screening, and similar structures shall be permitted within the required street setbacks subject to the following performance standards. a. Maximum height shall not exceed 42 inches.
b. Walls/fences taller than 30 inches in height shall be a minimum of 50 percent transparent.
c. A minimum of a 24 inch setback which is planted and irrigated is required from the sidewalk line. Retaining walls with a maximum height of 30 inches are exempt from this requirement. Walls, fences, or similar structures up to 42 inches in height which are used to delineate outdoor dining areas are also exempt from this requirement.
d. For specific design standards, please refer to Chapter 5.7.4, Walls, Fences, and Hedges.
64 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
F. Interior Property Walls
1. Interior walls/fences are permitted to a maximum height of 6 feet.
2. Solid walls/fences which are integrated into the building architecture may be permitted to match the height of the ground floor, with a maximum length of 20 feet. Landscape areas with a minimum depth of 4 feet which are planted and irrigated are required to soften the massing of the wall, with the exception of building/property entrances.
3. Exceptions. Guardrails may exceed the maximum height to the extent required by the Building Code. Guardrails shall be a minimum of 50 percent transparent.
G. Balconies and Roof Decks
1. Balconies. Balconies may project a maximum of 4 feet into a street setback but shall not extend beyond the property line or within 6 feet of any interior property line. Balconies shall not project from a building façade within 40 feet of a singlefamily residential zoning district.
2. Roof Decks. Roof decks shall be set back 5 feet from the building edge on all sides, and shall not be located within 50 feet of a single-family residential zoning district.
H. Signs
Please refer to SDMC for the City’s Sign Ordinance and the design standards and guidelines in Chapter 5.6.7 of this plan.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 65
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
4.3.3 OPEN SPACE
These standards are intended to:
• Provide a variety of open space types for gathering, recreation, and respite that contribute to enhanced livability;
• Give residents access to natural light and fresh air in and around living spaces; • Improve building design and site planning through the integration of open space throughout the development; and
• Correlate open space requirements with number of residents and size of buildings.
A. Types of Open Space
A variety of high quality, usable, and accessible open space contributes to an active public realm and successful building design. A combination of open space types serve a range of purposes, including spaces for relaxation and community gathering for residents, employees, and visitors. Open spaces on either the ground floor or on upper level stories, correlated to the building use and size, can also help to break up building massing, thereby improving site and building design. Open space types are defined as follows:
1. Private open spaces, including but not limited to patios, balconies, and front yards, adjoin a dwelling unit and are reserved for the exclusive use of the resident(s) of said unit, and their guests.
2. Common open spaces, including but not limited to courtyards, pool areas, roof decks, tot lots, communal picnic areas, fitness/gym facilities, clubhouses, etc., are usable spaces shared among residents of a building. Common open spaces may or may not be open to the public.
3. Publicly accessible open spaces, including but not limited to plazas, pocket parks, splash pads, and paseos are privately owned but open to the public. They typically include amenities such as outdoor seating, shared/open outdoor dining spaces, landscaping, fountains, and public art.
Private Open Space
Common Open Space
66 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
Publicly Accessible Open Space
B. Minimum Area
1. Private and Common Open Space. Projects shall provide the minimum area of open space based on use and size as prescribed below. Areas used regularly for parking, loading, or storage shall not count towards minimum open space requirements. a. Residential. Projects with dwelling units shall provide a minimum of 150 square feet of open space per unit as a combination or private and/or common open space.
b. Non-residential. Projects with more than 20,000 square feet of non-residential floor area shall provide a minimum of 5 percent of the gross non-residential floor area as common or publicly accessible open space.
c. Mixed-use. Projects shall comply with the requirements applicable to each type of use.
2. Publicly Accessible Open Space. In addition to the aforementioned provisions, projects with more than 80,000 square feet of floor area, inclusive of residential floor area, shall provide a percentage of gross floor area as publicly accessible open space as prescribed in Table 4.3-8. Publicly accessible open space shall be provided in addition to private and common open space requirements.
Table 4.3-7: Minimum Non-Residential Open Space
Minimum Non-Residential
Floor Area
Minimum Area Required
as a Percentage of GFA
20,000 sf GFA 5%
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 67
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
C. Standards for Private Open Space
1. Dimensions. A minimum area of 60 square feet with a minimum dimension of 6 feet in each direction shall be required for private open space.
2. Distribution. A minimum of 30 percent of the required residential open space shall be private open space. All private open space shall be outdoors.
D. Standards for Common Open Space
1. Dimensions. A minimum area of 1,000 square feet with a minimum dimension of 20 feet in each direction is required for common open space.
2. Distribution. A minimum of 30 percent of the required residential open space shall be common open space shared among tenants.
a. A minimum of 70 percent of common open space shall be outdoors.
A minimum of 70 percent of outdoor common open space shall be open to the sky.
3. Landscape. A minimum of 25 percent of common open space shall be planted area with a minimum dimension of 30 inches in each direction.
Landscaping shall comply with SDMC Title 18.
4. Trees. A minimum of one 24-inch box tree per unit or for every 500 square feet of open space, whichever is greater, shall be planted within the common open space area. A minimum of 50 percent of trees planted shall be shade trees.
5. Hardscape. A maximum of 25 percent of common open space may be paved in standard concrete. Remaining areas shall use one of the following enhanced paving techniques: brick, natural stone, unit concrete pavers, textured and colored concrete, or concrete with exposed or special aggregate. Alternative paving may also be allowed through Staff site plan review.
6. Access. Common open space, or portions of common open space, may be accessible to the public if desired by the property owner.
E. Standards for Publicly Accessible Open Space
1. Dimensions. A minimum of 400 square feet with a minimum dimension of 20 feet in each direction is required for publicly accessible open space.
2. Access. A minimum of 50 percent of the publicly accessible open space shall be accessible to the general public and shall not be restricted to patrons of a particular business.
3. Signage. Publicly accessible open space shall have visible signage from the adjacent sidewalk identifying the space as a publicly accessible amenity and listing accessible hours
4. Hours. At a minimum, publicly accessible open space which is not restricted to a particular business/tenant shall be open to the general public from 8 am to 8 pm.
5. Elevation. A minimum of 3,000 square feet of publicly accessible open space shall be at sidewalk elevation. If less square footage is required, then all required publicly accessible open space shall be at sidewalk elevation.
6. Hardscape. A maximum of 25 percent of publicly accessible open space shall be paved in standard concrete. Remaining areas shall use one of the following enhanced paving techniques: brick, natural stone, unit concrete pavers, textured and colored concrete, or concrete with exposed or special aggregate. Alternative paving may also be reviewed through Staff site plan review.
Project Size (GFA) 80,000-119,999
Square Feet
120,000+ Square
Feet
Required Open Space
(% of GFA) 2% 3%
Table 4.3-8: Minimum Required Publicly Accessible Open Space
68 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
7. Water Features. Decorative water features such as fountains, reflecting pools, or similar may be provided for a maximum of 5 percent of the Publicly Accessible Open Space. Swimming pools and splash pads intended for play by children are not considered water features for the purposes of this standard.
8. Seating. Seating shall be provided at a minimum of 1 seat per 300 square feet of required publicly accessible open space. Benches shall be calculated as 1 seat per 24 linear inches.
9. Landscape. A minimum of 25 percent of publicly accessible open space shall be planted area with a minimum dimension of 30 inches in length, width, and depth. Landscaping shall comply with SDMC.
10.Trees. A minimum of one 24-inch box tree shall be planted for every 750 square feet of publicly accessible open space. A minimum of 50 percent of trees planted shall be shade trees.
11.Common Open Space Credit. Publicly accessible open space in excess of the minimum may count towards a maximum of 30 percent of the common open space requirement at a 1:1 ratio.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 69
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
4.3.4 OUTDOOR DINING
A. Overview
The City of San Dimas encourages outdoor dining to revitalize and improve downtown as a community focus. Outdoor dining is allowed as an incidental use to an established restaurant, coffee house, or other food service businesses. The following standards and regulations shall apply for outdoor dining:
B. Development and Design Standards
1. The business owner shall at all times maintain a minimum clearance of four feet for use of the sidewalk by the general public.
2. Outdoor dining shall not obstruct any entries, exits, permitted signs, mailboxes, utilities, public seating, public safety measures, or extend into the safe line-of-sight distances at intersections, as determined by the City Engineer.
3. Outdoor dining may not be located within thirty feet of intersections and driveways and a safe line of sight must be provided in the location of outdoor dining.
4. Outdoor dining shall maintain required parking, vehicular circulation areas, and pedestrian circulation.
5. Outdoor dining area may be divided or fenced at a maximum height of three feet; glass or fully transparent enclosures of up to six feet may be permitted by the Director of Community Development.
6. Furnishings shall not exceed a cumulative maximum of seven (7) tables and fifteen (15) seats.
7. A restaurant may use the sidewalk or plaza adjacent to their business for exclusive permanent outdoor dining. The width of the dining area shall not exceed the width of the frontage of the subject business. The depth of the dining area shall depend upon the other required clearances described below.
a. Dining areas shall allow for at least four feet unobstructed clearance for pedestrian circulation.
b. The pedestrian path shall be measured from the dining area boundary to the curb face and other obstruction (e.g. planters, utility boxes). No tables, or chairs,
70 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
umbrellas, shade structures, or other fixtures shall be permitted within the pedestrian path.
8. Awnings, covers, furniture, umbrellas, shade structures, or other physical elements shall be compatible with the character of the main structure and regularly maintained in good working order. Faded and ripped fabric and materials shall be replaced.
9. Awnings, umbrellas, and similar covers must allow vertical clearance of seven feet above sidewalk level, and shall provide coverage of the dining area only and minimum two foot horizontal clearance for pedestrian walkways.
10.Shade structures, umbrellas and other decorative materials shall be fire-retardant, pressure-treated or manufactured of fire-resistant material.
11.Heating units are permitted if they are an outdoor approved type, are located in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations, and are located at least two feet from the edge of public walkways and from any umbrella canvas, any foliage, or any other flammable object or material. No heating units with open flames are permitted.
12.Outdoor dining shall be separated from parking facilities by pedestrian walkways, landscaping, decorative fences, walls, or other means approved by the Director of Community Development.
13.Signs, banners, and outdoor events shall be subject to separate application and permit procedures.
14.Additional parking is not required for establishments which comply with Chapter 18.156 (Parking) and where outdoor dining allows seating for 10 or fewer persons.
15.Outdoor dining area shall incorporate lighting for evening dining which shall be installed to prevent glare onto, or direct illumination of, any residential property or use.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 71
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
in the right of way will be preserved or enhanced. The business owner shall notify the Public Works Department before any work within the public right-of-way begins. Paving, landscaping, and fencing materials and design shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and the City Engineer.
3. If outdoor dining is proposed in the public right-of-way or in a common area of a shopping center, adjoining business establishments will be notified of the application. Applications will be reviewed by City Staff.
C. Operational Standards
1. The business owner shall be responsible for maintaining all chairs, tables, fencing, paving, ground surfaces, landscaping and other improvements associated with outdoor dining in a safe, sound, and visually attractive condition.
2. Tables shall be placed only in the locations shown on the approved site plan.
3. Movable furniture must be secured or moved inside at closing time. No immovable benches will be allowed. Dining equipment, if stored, may not be stored in an area visible from the public right of way or from any plaza area.
4. Outdoor dining areas shall be operated in a manner that meets all requirements of the health department and all other applicable regulations such as noise, laws, city ordinances, or standards.
5. Outdoor dining areas shall contain waste receptables for use by patrons.
6. Alcoholic beverages may be served in an outdoor dining area, subject to approval by the City and the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC).
D. Review and Notifications
1. Outdoor dining shall not be established on any property until an application has been reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of the Zoning Code. The application shall include a detailed site plan, improvement plan, permission from the property owner and/or management company, and payment of applicable fees.
2. If outdoor dining is located within the public right-of-way, the business owner shall submit an application for an encroachment permit to the Public Works Department. To the greatest extent possible, landscaping
72 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
4.3.5 OUTDOOR DISPLAYS OF MERCHANDISE
A. Overview
The City of San Dimas encourages outdoor displays as a means to revitalize and improve the downtown as a community focus. All businesses which engage in the outdoor display of merchandise shall comply with the following standards and regulations:
B. Development and Design Standards
1. Outdoor display shall only include incidental outdoor display items, consisting of a small sample of merchandise or decorative items, placed outdoors adjacent to the responsible business, which represent or complement the goods and services sold or provided by the business.
Vendors operating independently from indoor businesses shall not be permitted.
2. The business owner shall at all times maintain a minimum five feet clearance for use of the sidewalk by the general public.
3. Display items shall also not encroach into public landscape areas. In addition, the business owner shall not trim, cut, or otherwise alter any landscaping or make any other modifications to improvements in the public right-of-way.
4. Display items shall only be located adjacent to the building of the responsible business, and shall not exceed a total of 60 square feet of floor area per street frontage.
5. Outdoor display of merchandise along the property frontage shall not exceed 25 percent of the linear frontage of the store front or six linear feet, whichever is greater and items may not project more than four feet from the store front.
6. The display items shall not obstruct any display windows, entries, exits, permitted signs, mailboxes, utilities, public seating, or public safety measures.
7. Display items shall not extend into the safe line-of-sight distances at intersections, as determined by the City Engineer.
8. Display items shall only be placed outdoors during the time the responsible business is open to the public and shall be removed prior to the close of business each day.
9. Display items shall not include clothes racks, display/storage racks with multiple items, folding or portable tables, stacks of merchandise, or any neon or fluorescent materials.
10. All display items shall at all times be maintained in a safe, sound, and visually attractive condition. The business owner shall be responsible for continuously supervising the safe, sound, and visually attractive condition as well as the appropriate placement of the display items.
11. Signs, banners, outdoor dining, and outdoor events shall be subject to application and permit procedures in the City’s zoning code.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 73
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
4.3.6 PARKING
These standards are intended to:
• Ensure new development provides adequate parking to support the uses within a project;
• Encourage developers to provide additional public parking beyond the minimum requirements through bonus development incentives; • Regulate appropriate parking supply and location in a manner that prioritizes pedestrian access and multi-modal activity; • Encourage change of use and adaptive reuse of existing buildings through parking reductions and exemptions; and
• Reduce the visual impacts of parking.
A. Minimum Parking
1. Number of Spaces. Projects shall provide off-street parking spaces per Table 4.3-9 based on general use classifications, and subject to the standards of SDMC.
2. Shared Parking. Parking may be shared among multiple uses per SDMC.
Table 4.3-9: Minimum Parking Spaces Required by Land Use Use Classification Number of Spaces
Commercial
Banks and Financial Services 1 space per 250 SF
Grocery Stores 1 space per 250 SF
Hotels 1 space per room
Medical 1 space per 200 SF
Office and Professional Uses 1 space per 300 SF
Restaurants and Bars 1 space per 350 SF
Restaurants, Fast Food/Fast Casual 1 space per 500 SF
Retail and Service Uses 1 space per 400 SF
Service Stations 1 space per 250 SF
Industrial
Light Manufacturing 1 space per 500 SF
Warehousing, Distribution, & Storage 1 space per 1,000 SF Institutional and Public Assembly
Private Schools 1 space per 5 students
Religious Institutions and Churches,
Social Clubs, Lodges, Event Centers, and
Private Meeting Halls
1 space per 75 SF
Recreational and Cultural
Commercial Recreation, Outdoor 1 space per 500 SF
Commercial Recreational and Social
Experiences, Indoor 1 space per 250 SF
Entertainment and Performance
Establishments 0.3 space per 1 seat
Museums, Art Galleries and Working
Studios, and similar Cultural Institutions 1 space per 500 SF continued on next page
74 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
Example of a well-screened parking structure designed
blend in with accompanying development
3. Unbundled Parking. For any development with new residential units, off-street automobile parking spaces shall be leased or sold separately from the unit rental or purchase fees, such that renters or buyers have the option of renting or buying the residential unit at a lower price than if the parking was included.
a. For deed-restricted affordable units, one parking space shall be included in the base rent of each unit. The tenant may choose to receive the parking spaces or receive a rent discount equivalent to half the amount charged for monthly lease of a parking space.
Tenants of affordable units shall not sublease their parking spaces. b. Renters or buyers shall have the right of first refusal to parking built for their unit. Any remaining spaces may be leased to other users on a month-to-month basis. New occupants shall have the opportunity to lease or purchase parking built for their unit.
Table 4.3-9: Minimum Parking Spaces Required by Land Use (continued) Use Classification Number of Spaces
Residential
Multi-family*
Studio or 1-bedroom 1.5 per unit
2 bedroom 2 per unit
3 bedroom 2 per unit
4 or more bedrooms 2 per unit
Visitors 1 per 4 guests
*Condominiums, townhomes, and other similar complexes require garage spaces
B. Vehicle Access
1. Driveways.
a. Driveways shall be prohibited on primary frontages of 200 feet or less where there is access available from a secondary street or alley. b. For projects with less than 200 feet of primary street frontage and with no alley or secondary street access, a maximum of one twolane driveway shall be permitted. For sites with more than 200 feet of primary street frontage and with no alley or secondary street access, a maximum of two two-lane driveways shall be permitted. c. The Director of Community Development shall determine the primary frontage.
d. For further design standards and guidelines, please refer to Chapter
5.5.3, Vehicular Access.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 75
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
C. Layout and Design
1. Siting of Parking Areas. Required off-street parking shall be provided underground, in above-ground structures, or behind street-facing buildings within interior parking courts. If surface parking lots are necessary, they shall be located in areas behind buildings and away from the street, open spaces, and corners.
2. Surface Parking. Parking lots shall be setback a minimum of 30 feet from the primary frontage, 10 feet from any secondary frontage, and 10 feet from any adjacent singlefamily residential zoning district. a. Parking shall be buffered by habitable floor area or landscaped area, with the exception of access and driveways.
b. Parking lot landscaping shall be provided in accordance with SDMC, with the additional requirement that one tree of at least 24 gallons in size shall be provided for every 6 parking spaces. Trees shall be distributed as evenly as possible throughout the parking area, with a maximum of 35 percent of required trees clustered within the street setback.
3. Podium Parking. A maximum of 1 story of above-grade parking is permitted within habitable buildings. Multiple stories of above ground parking are permitted if the project meets the parking structure standards below.
4. Parking Structures. Structures shall be buffered by habitable floor area between the parking area and Bonita Avenue and San Dimas Avenue, with the exception of access and driveways. Parking structures shall be screened from public view on all public streets through either buffering of habitable floor area or permanent view-obscuring screening materials which also incorporate enhanced landscaping. a. Elevators and stairs shall be located adjacent to sidewalks or other public spaces. b. Parking areas shall be screened from the public realm using heavy-gauge metal, precast concrete panels, laminated glass, green walls, or other means subject to review and approval by the Development Plan Review Board.
5. Underground Parking. Subterranean parking is encouraged. No setbacks are required other than those required to comply with building codes. d to
76 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 4
4.4 DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES FOR PROVISION
OF BONUS PUBLIC PARKING WITHIN THE
GATEWAY VILLAGE WEST AREA
It is the intent of the Specific Plan to ensure that adequate parking is provided which can serve both users of the light rail and employees and patrons of the commercial establishments within the plan area. The plan area will benefit from both the provision of 1) shared parking by all businesses in the plan area, so that shoppers can park in one location and visit many different businesses, and 2) centralized parking which is located behind the Bonita Avenue frontage, to allow for proximate access but prevent negative impacts on the pedestrian experience.
This section is provided for the purpose of incentivizing developers to provide public, shared parking beyond the minimum parking requirements under Section 4.3.6.
Development incentives are available in the form of increased density, FAR, height, and number of stories as laid out in Table 4.4-1 for sites with development projects that provide additional public parking beyond the prescribed parking ratios within Table
4.3-10, in the amount of one additional parking space for each 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area. For projects which provide one additional parking space for each 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area, the project shall receive all of the benefits (increased density, number of stories, building height, and FAR) which are outlined in Table 4.4-1.
If in the future, a central City-managed parking facility is provided, additional public parking shall not be required on the project site in order to develop with the development incentives listed in Table 4.4-1; in place, an in-lieu fee, equivalent to 100 percent of the cost of the required parking at the parking facilities shall be provided.
These development incentives are limited to projects located within the Gateway Village West Area. The Town Core Area and Gateway Village East Area were specifically excluded from additional development incentives to protect neighborhood compatibility with existing primarily single-story, single-family homes in the vicinity.
Table 4.4-1: Development Incentives
Area Base Standard
Bonus Standard
with Extra Public
Parking
Gateway
Village
West
Maximum Density:
45 du/acre
Maximum Density:
55 du/acre
Maximum Number
of Stories: 4
Maximum Number
of Stories: 5
Maximum Height:
Dependent on Use,
See Table 4.3-1
Maximum Height:
Additional 12’ in
height is allowed
than would otherwise
apply under Table
4.3-1
Maximum FAR:
2.0 Maximum FAR:
2.25
SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 5:
DESIGN STANDARDS
AND GUIDELINES
5.1 Introduction.........................................................................78
5.2 Purpose................................................................................78
5.3 Standards vs. Guidelines.....................................................78
5.4 Applicants............................................................................78
5.5 Site Planning........................................................................79
5.6 Building Design ...................................................................83
5.7 Landscape Design ...............................................................92
5.8 Sustainable Design ..............................................................97
5.9 Street Activation..................................................................99
5.10 Historic Preservation and Adaptive Reuse .......................103
78 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.1 INTRODUCTION
To make downtown San Dimas a memorable, accessible, and economically vibrant downtown with a distinct sense of place, a well-designed and cohesive public realm will be essential. The character and design of buildings, public spaces, and streetscape elements set forth in this chapter will help create a unique destination and place that residents and visitors will enjoy.
The siting and orientation of buildings, along with exterior architectural features, are critical in defining the character of the downtown area. This chapter’s design standards and guidelines provide a framework for public improvements, site design, and building architecture in the downtown area. Upholding these critical design components will help leverage the area’s existing strengths and pedestrian scale to create a more unified and welcoming downtown.
Additionally, improved streetscapes will invite more activity and complement adjacent land uses to create a pedestrian-oriented downtown. Streetscape improvements will be implemented over time and may be carried out by various developers as well as the City of San Dimas.
Ultimately, these improvements will help enhance local business vitality, promote economic development, foster entrepreneurship and creativity, and bolster a sense of character and place within downtown San Dimas.
5.2 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide greater clarity and certainty about project design standards, site planning, and architectural design expectations for project applicants and the community. The design standards and guidelines apply for all new residential and non-residential development, including upgrades to existing structures. The goal is to expedite the review process by clearly stating the City’s desires for high quality projects that contribute to creating a more cohesive, memorable, accessible, and attractive downtown area for San Dimas.
A development project is to comply with the standards and intent of the guidelines. In the event of a conflict between the standards in the Zoning Code and the Downtown Specific Plan standards and guidelines, these standards and guidelines shall apply.
5.3 STANDARDS VS. GUIDELINES
“Design standards” are mandatory requirements that must be satisfied in project design. For multifamily developments, objective design standards are qualitative or quantifiable rules or measures that must be satisfied unless an applicant requests discretionary design review, wherein additional justification demonstrates that the intent of the design rule is met by alternative means.
“Design Guidelines” are not mandatory requirements, but rather express objectives with respect to specific development features or conditions and explain why a particular guideline or criterion is an appropriate way to achieve the objective.
5.4 APPLICANTS
Applicants should meet with City staff early in the design process for assistance with the interpretation of the Design Standards and Guidelines, and their application to a specific site or project.
For qualifying multi-family projects under SB 35, all of the objective design standards must be met for a streamlined review process. More information regarding this ministerial review process for multi-family residential can be found in Chapter 8, Implementation, Subsection 3, Administration.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 79
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.5 SITE PLANNING
5.5.1 BUILDING PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION
The site design process involves how buildings are placed on a site, where access will occur, and how structures and spaces are located in relation to each other and to adjacent off-site uses. The following standards and guidelines shall be integrated in the site design of all new projects.
A. Standards
1. Buildings shall be oriented towards streets and public open spaces and away from parking areas, to stimulate pedestrian activity and create an active public realm.
2. On corner lots, a building shall be required at the street corner of the lot to activate the secondary frontage and avoid blank walls.
3. If a lot has two street corners, both street corners of the lot shall be occupied by a building, public plaza, or publicly accessible plaza.
4. Street-facing façades shall be built parallel to the street right-of-way, unless special circumstances permit otherwise.
B. Guidelines
1. Primary entrances of non-residential uses should be visible and accessible from the public right-of-way or public open spaces. Corner commercial uses should have a corner entrance or an entrance oriented toward each street.
2. In the Town Core sub-area, new construction should join or abut adjacent buildings where possible. In addition, new buildings set back from the street should be discouraged.
3. Where permitted, ground-floor residential dwelling units should be oriented toward the street and include identifiable entries.
4. The lobbies, recreation, or community rooms associated with standalone multi-family residences and mixed-use buildings, when located at the ground level, should be designed to activate and create a strong visual connection with the street or outdoor public space.
80 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.5.2 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND ACCESS
Areas between buildings and open spaces should be linked to and connected by safe, convenient, and accessible pedestrian pathways. Development projects should be designed to encourage walking, biking, and other forms of non-motorized active transportation for access and internal circulation.
A. Standards
1. Private pedestrian walkways and bicycle facilities shall connect all buildings on a site to each other, to on-site automobile and bicycle parking areas, and to any on-site open space areas or pedestrian amenities.
2. Walkways within a development shall be a minimum of four feet wide and paved with concrete or with another type of paving material.
B. Guidelines
1. Pedestrian amenities, such as special paving materials, landscaping, pedestrianscaled lighting, water fountains, shade features, trash and recycling receptacles, and street furniture should be provided along sidewalks and bike and pedestrian paths.
2. Bicycle and pedestrian circulation facilities should provide connections to surrounding uses and to existing/planned pedestrian and bicycle networks. Access to these networks on and at the edges of the site should be prioritized in site design.
3. Sidewalks or pedestrians walkways should be included within surface parking lots to provide safe pedestrian travel from parking spaces to uses served by the parking.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 81
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.5.3 VEHICULAR ACCESS
The siting and design of vehicular access points and areas for parking are important to consider in the design of new development projects. The standards and guidelines below provide guidance on how to minimize conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians in the specific plan area.
A. Standards
1. See Chapter 4.3.4B for standards for vehicular access.
2. All parking areas shall be internally connected when possible and shall use shared driveways within the development.
3. Parking shall be located to the rear and side of buildings along Bonita Avenue.
B. Guidelines
1. To slow traffic and enhance the overall site design, site entry and edge design features should be incorporated, such as colored or textured paving treatments, landscaping, and signage.
2. The number and distribution of driveways/curb-cuts should be limited.
Buildings located on the same block should use common or shared driveways/curb-cuts where feasible. Where a driveway crosses a sidewalk or bicycle path, the sidewalk or bicycle path should be clearly demarcated across the entire width of the driveway.
82 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.5.4 NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY AND TRANSITIONS
New development should relate to the existing scale and character of existing surrounding buildings and single-family neighborhoods. This includes reducing the massing of new structures as well as incorporating specific design treatments to help reduce the intensity of new buildings.
A. Standards
1. Residential developments located across the street from single-family neighborhoods shall orient the following features toward the street: individual entries, patio areas, and landscape or planted areas.
2. Multi-family units abutting single-family neighborhoods shall include individual front doors and interior stairs (when stairs are needed) for all ground units fronting the street.
B. Guidelines
1. Create contextual fit with surrounding uses and buildings, through scale and massing, transition in height, and building materials.
2. Create a contextual fit with articulated building form including strong massing and horizontal division (base, middle, top)
3. All buildings constructed in the Gateway Village East area shall be designed to maximize the privacy of any adjacent homes, backyards, and residential neighborhoods.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 83
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.6 BUILDING DESIGN
5.6.1 BUILDING MASSING, FORM, AND SCALE
A. Standards
1. See Building Modulation standards in Chapter 4.3.1.
2. A minimum of two architectural features shall be incorporated into each building as appropriate to the architectural style of the building, including: dormers, bay windows, enhanced individualized entries, and accent materials.
3. Attached housing, such as townhouses, shall look like separate units by the use of clearly identified entries, style and design details, and/or differing roof forms.
4. Architectural elements such as bay windows, cantilevered rooms, and awnings shall project from the façade plane. Cantilevered rooms shall not project more than 48 inches from the main façade.
B. Guidelines
1. New development should respect the scale and character of existing neighborhoods by providing appropriate height, mass, and setbacks and by limiting the general scale of development near existing singlefamily residences.
2. Individual buildings on the same lot or part of the same development should be modulated to ensure development is consistent with the existing character and scale of San Dimas.
3. In the Town Center sub-area, shopfront widths should be between 20 feet and 50 feet wide.
4. Large development projects should be designed to appear as a collection of appropriately-scaled buildings, and should integrate public open space, including plazas, paseos, etc.
5. Buildings should be designed to include vertical and horizontal articulation to reduce the perception of large-scale, monotonous development.
6. Attention to detail and architectural quality should be used at the ground floor façade of buildings, which should be designed to activate the streetscape and provide an engaging and interesting pedestrian experience.
84 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.6.2 BUILDING ARTICULATION
Appropriate building façade design will ensure the appropriate scale and character of buildings in the Downtown Specific Plan area. Finely detailed and articulated building façades create a rich character and human scale.
A. Standards
1. The maximum extent of a blank façade without any vertical or horizontal architectural design feature or articulation shall not exceed 30 feet in length.
2. Buildings shall incorporate architectural elements and details on all walls, such as notches, grouping windows, providing for loggias and dormers, adding canopies, wing walls, trellis features, arcades, and colonnades, and varying cornices and rooflines.
3. Storefront configurations and details providing a sense of human scale, variety, and interest within the overall context of buildings’ bays and groupings of bays are required. Such details include but are not limited to recessed entries (minimum of 5 feet) at storefronts, display windows, projecting bays, integral awning, utilization of true dividing mullions, transoms over entries, and integral signs and sign boards.
4. Materials, colors, and textures shall be varied to enhance key components of a building’s façade (i.e., window trims, entries, projecting elements, etc.).
5. The massing of large-scale buildings shall be broken up with variations in building mass, articulation features, architectural details, and changes in materials and colors.
6. The building design shall articulate the façade to express the building’s floor levels as a base for the ground floor, a body for the upper floors, and a cap at the top of the façade.
a. Base. Differentiate the ground floor with substantial horizontal articulation of the façade at the top of the first story (cornice, belt course, or other architectural element that is appropriate to the building style), different wall materials from upper floors, and/or larger window openings such as storefronts.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 85
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
b. Body. Differentiate upper floors from ground floors with different wall materials and colors and different window sizes and orientations. c. Cap. Provide articulation at the parapet (for buildings with flat roofs) or below the eve (for buildings with sloped roofs) that marks the top of the building with a cornice, color change, or material change.
B. Guidelines
1. In the Town Core sub-area, new construction with blank façades to the street or rear parking areas should be discouraged.
2. Activate upper-story stepback areas with balconies, roof decks, and roof gardens.
3. Non-residential uses should use building setbacks and arcaded spaces as an extension of the sidewalk to provide adequate space for pedestrian movement and activity. This space can be used for outdoor seating, street furniture, landscaping, public art, and outdoor dining that can enliven the streetscape.
4. Murals, espaliers/trellises and/or vines should be placed on large wall expanses.
5. Empty and/or vacant storefronts shall have decorative murals or coverings of the storefront windows until the unit or space is leased.
5.6.3 MATERIALS AND FINISHES
High-quality finish materials promote the longevity of a building and add to its character, particularly on the ground floor, where people are most likely to interact with the building and can easily see and touch the materials. Buildings are highly encouraged to use durable, sustainable, low maintenance, high quality materials to develop longlasting buildings that can be adaptively reused over time and are appropriate to the architectural character of San Dimas and the region.
A. Standards
1. Building materials shall be applied consistently to all façades.
2. Finish materials shall terminate at changes in the wall plane and not on the same plane.
86 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
3. Buildings shall have a color palette that consists of at least two (2) body colors and two (2) accent colors (not including roof color). Projects with two (2) or more residential buildings shall include a minimum of two (2) color palettes and shall not use a single palette on more than 70 percent of the residential structures.
4. Large areas of bold and bright colors are prohibited. Bold and bright colors shall be limited to trim and accents, and balanced with soft/ muted colors.
5. Buildings shall incorporate a minimum of two (2) building wall materials on the body of each building elevation. Trim does not count as the second material. No more than three (3) materials shall be used.
6. The primary wall finish material shall consist of stucco, stone and brick masonry, vertical standing seam siding, fiber-cement composite cladding and siding, or wood.
Horizonal siding shall be individual siding planks.
7. The following materials are prohibited: T1-11, vinyl siding, exposed concrete masonry block, textured or patterned wood/stone/brick panels, and glossy and/or reflective colors and materials.
8. Heavier materials (such as masonry) shall be applied on lower levels to support lighter materials (such as stucco or fiber-cement composite cladding).
9. Masonry and stone detail veneer shall be applied in a manner that expresses the structural integrity of real masonry, especially at corners, windows, and doors. Stone material shall not be painted; brick may be painted.
10.Changes in materials and colors shall occur along horizontal lines, vertical lines (such as columns, pillars, etc.), or at internal building corners only. Material changes at outside corners are prohibited.
11.When the span to an inside corner is 25 feet or more, the change in material and colors shall wrap around the corner of the building and extend a minimum of six (6) feet beyond the corner, or terminate at the nearest window or door.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 87
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
B. Guidelines
1. Materials and finishes should be used consistently and should be appropriate to the architectural style of the building.
2. Materials and finishes for new buildings in the Town Core and Transit Village designations should be consistent and contextual with other buildings in the area.
3. High-quality, long-lasting materials should be used for exterior window sills and trims and should be consistent with the overall architectural style of the building.
4. Exposed wood should be finished in a manner that minimizes maintenance and promotes the material’s longevity.
5. Roof materials should complement the materials and colors of the façades and provide texture or relief.
6. Rain gutters and downspouts should be integrated into the façade. At a minimum, their color should blend with adjacent surfaces.
5.6.4 ROOFLINES
The roof forms of new development should be integrated with the overall design and architectural style of the building. New commercial and mixeduse development should try to emulate existing roof shapes and forms as much as possible to maintain the character of an existing area. However, variation in roof shapes can be desirable if compatible with existing buildings on the block.
A. Standards
1. Variation of roof forms shall be used on buildings of over 50 feet in length along the street frontage and accomplished through the use of differences in roof height and/or form. This may include a change in wall or roof height of a minimum of four feet; a change in roof pitch or form; or the inclusion of dormers, parapets, and/or varying cornices.
2. Roof style shall be consistent throughout. Pitched roofs shall consist of one primary slope, with allowance to deviate for architectural elements such as towers and rotundas.
B. Guidelines
1. A roof parapet or separate roof screen wall should be architecturally integrated to building design for screening of roof equipment and projections.
2. Varied roof form should be used as appropriate to the architectural style, such as the following: hipped roofs, gabled roofs, varying pitches, and roof dormers.
3. Rooflines shall be designed with changes in ridgeline direction and configuration to ensure variation in rooflines between structures.
88 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.6.5 ENTRIES, DOORS, AND WINDOWS
Entryways are an important design feature in buildings as they guide guests to the interior and provide opportunities for architectural definition.
Similarly, the use and location of windows and secondary entrances are a key component of building design.
A. Standards
1. A minimum of one primary entrance shall be located on the primary frontage of each building and open onto a sidewalk or public space.
2. Entrances shall be recessed a minimum of 30 inches from the ground floor building façade.
3. Primary entrances shall be distinguished by architectural features (change in roof form), overhead projections (such as an awning or canopy), or decorative details.
4. For non-residential uses, primary entrances shall be located at sidewalk elevation.
5. For residential uses, the entrance/first habitable floor shall be located between 6 feet above and 2 feet below the sidewalk elevation.
6. Windows and doors shall either be trimmed or recessed. When trimmed, the trim material shall not be less than 4 inches in width by ¾ inches in depth when protruding from the wall. Foam trim molding is prohibited on the ground floor. When recessed, the window shall be recessed a minimum of two (2) inches from the building façade and the finish material shall cover the recessed edge faces and wrap toward the interior face of the window.
7. Clear glass shall be used for storefront and transom windows in the Town Core area.
B. Guidelines
1. Rear entrances to commercial properties from parking areas should be provided. The proportions and style of windows and doors should be consistent with the overall appearance of the façade.
2. Encourage windows and doors to include accent elements such as shutters, moldings, and divided lights.
3. Create a sense of entry at a pedestrian scale through well-designed nonresidential storefronts including windows, doors, wall composition, colors, and materials.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 89
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.6.6 LIGHTING
Lighting on buildings and sites can have a dramatic effect on the quality and appearance of commercial and downtown districts. The color, intensity, and types of lighting used in streets, on buildings, and in landscape areas contributes to the character of an area. Adequate and carefully placed lighting can improve the safety and security of a site, adjacent streets, and surrounding properties. Visibility at intersections and pedestrian crossings can also be enhanced with appropriate lighting.
A. Standards
1. On any street frontages within the Town Core, and on all Bonita Avenue street frontages within the specific plan area, pedestrian-scale lighting, such as sconces and goose-neck fixtures, shall be located on the building frontage a minimum of every 30 feet.
2. Fixtures shall be placed between 8 and 15 feet above sidewalk elevation, and shall not project more than 30 inches from the façade.
3. Lighting shall be static. Flashing, pulsating, or other dynamic lighting is not permitted.
4. Lighting is required in all surface parking lots, parking structures, outdoor seating and dining areas, outdoor walkways, outdoor trash/ recycling storage area, and other areas routinely used by pedestrians.
5. All structures, entries, parking areas, refuse enclosures, active outdoor/ landscape areas, and pedestrian pathways shall include dusk to dawn lighting for safety and security.
6. Lighting fixtures shall not light directly into adjacent residential properties; a translucent or optical lens diffuser globe or shield is required.
7. Lighting shall emit a white light that renders true colors. Sodium vapor, or other lights casting a colored glow, should not be used. This standard does not apply to colored accent lighting for special building elements, signs, or landscape or water features.
8. A photometric plan shall be required to ensure adequate lighting coverage of the developed property.
B. Guidelines
1. Light fixtures and poles should be designed to be compatible with the building’s architectural style.
2. Building entrances should be well-lighted with appropriately scaled light fixtures.
3. Select light fixtures so that the light goes exactly where it is intended.
Special care should be taken to include louvers, glare shields, or barn doors to the front of floodlight fixtures to prevent light pollution.
4. Mount lighting fixtures in strategic locations to facilitate maintenance.
5. Incorporate lighting into architectural features such as doors, window openings, detail cornices, columns, and arcades to create texture and form unique to the building.
6. Encourage color and finish of lighting metalwork, when used, to harmonize with building metalwork, if applicable.
7. Enhance the front building façades during twilight and night-time hours with architectural lighting.
90 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.6.7 SIGNAGE
A. Building Signage
Building signage is an integral part of the architectural design of every building or development. Too much or too large signage can be counterproductive, detracting from the architectural statement of a building, and creating visual clutter and confusion. The City of San Dimas Sign Ordinance shall be referenced for all private property signage design requirements and standards. The following design guidelines apply to signs in the Specific Plan area.
1. Guidelines.
a. Encourage signs that reflect a well-crafted, high-quality, detailed design approach.
b. Signs should reflect the uses they represent in creative and fun, as well as functional, ways.
c. Sign shapes, type styles, and color combinations should complement building styles and reflect the business they represent.
B. Gateway Signage
Gateway treatments and signage will help create an identity for Downtown San Dimas and announce this area as a special, unique place within the City. Gateways are intended to identify primary entrances into the City of San Dimas.
1. Guidelines.
a. Signs should be colorful, lit for increased visibility, landscaped, and placed permanently at the back of the sidewalk or within raised medians.
b. Gateway locations should have a unique and easily identifiable appearance with specific landscaping, lighting, and/or special signage.
c. Monuments or signs should have the city logo and a greeting that is unique to the City. complement building styles and reflect the business they represent.
C. Directional Signage
The City may choose to administer a directional signage program for key landmarks and destinations in the downtown, which shall be designed and maintained by the City. Signs shall include directional arrows and labeling to provide destinations and public information in the right-of-way, such as parking facilities and the San Dimas Metro transit station. Directional signs should be smaller than for City gateways, but constructed of similar materials.
1. Guidelines.
a. Directional signs should be located at key locations around the Downtown periphery.
b. Directional signs should be in proportion to adjacent buildings and landscaped areas.
c. Directional signs should
be well lit, landscaped,
and prominently placed
to increase visibility for
motorists.
d. They should also be placed
permanently at the back of
sidewalks, or within raised
medians or parkways.
e. Complementary colors,
materials, and lettering fonts
should be incorporated into
the overall sign.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 91
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.6.8 SHADE STRUCTURES
Shade structures (such as canopies, awnings, and overhead projections) help provide shade and shelter for pedestrians while also adding visual interest to buildings. They encourage a pedestrian scale at the street level and make it more comfortable to walk.
While awnings may not be appropriate along every façade, awnings and other coverings should be encouraged as building façade enhancements wherever appropriate.
A. Standards
1. Awnings are allowed on the first and second stories; above the second story, a structured trellis shall be used. However, structured trellis can be used in lieu of awnings on the first and second stories.
2. Awnings shall be placed relative to major architectural elements of the façade.
Awnings shall not be placed in a manner in which they cover transom windows or architectural elements such as belt courses, decorative trim, or other notable architectural façade elements.
3. Awnings shall be prohibited from covering building piers.
4. Awnings shall be constructed of durable materials such as canvas or metal.
5. Awnings and other projections into public right-of-way shall require an encroachment permit.
B. Guidelines
1. Awnings, overhangs, and arcades should be provided in pedestrian areas to provide overhead protection and highlight building entrances.
2. Awnings should be designed to be decorative, complementary to the overall façade design, and effective for weather and sun protection.
92 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.7 LANDSCAPE DESIGN
5.7.1 LANDSCAPE DESIGN
Landscaping, trees, and plantings in the specific plan area will help soften the impact of the built environment and create visual interest. In addition, street trees will provide shade and invite pedestrian activity.
A. Standards
1. All required yards, spaces between buildings, and open space shall be landscaped pursuant to an approved landscape plan in compliance with Section 18.14 Water-Efficient Landscapes of the City of San Dimas Municipal Code.
2. No artificial trees, shrubs, or plants shall be used as landscape within front yards, parkways, or within on-site common open space areas.
Artificial turf may be used subject to compliance with Chapter 18.14 of the San Dimas Municipal Code.
3. Landscaped Buffer. The following shall be provided along the edges of all interior side yard and/or rear yard lot lines that abut a single-family residential zoned lot or single-family use:
a. A decorative masonry wall per the fencing/wall requirements of these standards.
b. A ten-foot minimum wide landscaped buffer for residential and commercial uses. A six-foot minimum landscaped buffer area for surface parking lots and driveways.
c. A row of evergreen trees to screen views to and from the adjacent lots.
d. The requirement for the decorative wall may be waived by the Director of Community Development if a decorative wall exists on adjacent lot(s).
4. Landscape areas shall be regularly maintained to keep sites aesthetically pleasing, and to remove and replace unsightly dead or dying plants.
B. Guidelines
1. Landscaping should be used to enhance the public and private realm, shade walkways, gathering areas, and parking areas, and screen utilities or mechanical equipment.
2. Native, drought-tolerant, or plant species well-adapted to the climate of San Dimas should be used to reduce water usage and maintenance.
3. Permeable paving materials are encouraged to be used to reduce the impervious surface area of the site and minimize stormwater runoff.
4. Paving materials used in yards, setbacks, common open space areas, walkways, and patios should include cast-in-place concrete, stamped concrete, concrete unit pavers, stone, brick, tile, aggregate recycled paving materials.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 93
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.7.2 STREETSCAPE DESIGN
Streetscapes are the collective appearance of all buildings, pedestrian walkways, and landscaping along a street. A streetscape is the visual identity of a neighborhood or district.
A. Guidelines
1. The streetscape should be designed to enhance the pedestrian experience and encourage walking as a form of transportation and leisure.
2. Street furniture should serve a variety of purposes and uses, be a consistent design character, and be located in areas that do not conflict with pedestrian and bicyclist movement.
3. Pedestrian and bicycle-oriented lighting should be provided to facilitate safe and comfortable walking and bicycling in the DTSP area in the early morning, evening, and nighttime.
4. Sidewalks should include a clear zone allowing for the safe and uninterrupted passage of pedestrians between a building façade and curb.
5. A variety of special colored, textured, and/or permeable paving or surface treatments should be used to delineate areas for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorists within the streetscape, including the use of raised or textured crosswalks.
6. The use of green infrastructure, including pervious materials, bioswales, planting strips, and other sustainable landscape features are strongly encouraged.
Street Furniture Area
Seating, Bike Racks, &
Street Lights
Elongated Sidewalk
& Private Outdoor
Space
Sidewalk Passage
Area
Parkway Buffer
Trees & Shrubs
On-Street Parking
New Development
Commercial & Mixed Use
Street
94 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.7.3 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
Public open space encompasses the variety of spaces within the urban environment that are readily and freely accessible to the wider community for recreation and enjoyment.
A. Standards
See development standards for public open space in Chapter 4.
B. Guidelines
1. Public open space should be designed and programmed to be inviting and serve a variety of needs and interests, including the incorporation of areas for physical activity and recreation, relaxation, and socialization.
2. Public open spaces should be designed for both day and evening use.
3. Lighting fixtures and systems should be integral in the design of open spaces.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 95
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.7.4 WALLS AND FENCES
The design and careful treatment of walls and fences can create a pleasant and unified appearance of properties and streetscapes in Downtown San Dimas.
A. Standards
1. Walls and fences shall be constructed of durable materials and designed to complement the surrounding architecture.
2. Both sides of all perimeter walls and fences shall be architecturally treated.
3. Perimeter and property line walls shall consist of decorative split-face block, concrete masonry unit (cmu) with a stucco finish, brick, or stone. Interior walls, fences and gates shall consist of the above-mentioned materials or wrought iron, wood, plastic/ wood composites, or brick and stone materials. Walls shall be finished with a pre-cast concrete, stone, or brick trim cap.
4. Retaining walls within the primary or side street setback area shall be constructed of cast in place concrete, concrete masonry unit (cmu) with a stucco finish, brick, or stone and shall be compatible with the design of the buildings on the site.
5. Chain link fences, barbed wire, razor wire, electric wire, and similar wire types are prohibited. Plain concrete masonry unit (cmu) is also prohibited.
6. For wall and fence height requirements, refer to 4.3.2(E) and 4.3.2(F) of this specific plan.
96 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.7.5 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND SERVICE AREAS
Poorly located accessory and service elements can detract from the visual appeal of a property and a streetscape, increase visual clutter, and create hazards for pedestrians and autos. With proper design, these elements can be integrated and blended into a site and to not be obtrusive.
A. Standards
1. Mechanical equipment shall be located on the roof and fully screened by a parapet wall or within the building whenever feasible and shall be fully screened. For buildings with flat roofs without a parapet, or with pitched roofs, mechanical equipment shall only be permitted when located within an equipment well.
2. When equipment must be located on the ground, it shall be located within the rear yard or interior side yard to the maximum extent feasible.
Equipment shall not be located within a unit’s private open space area.
3. Air intake and exhaust systems, or other mechanical equipment that generates noise, smoke, or odors, shall not be located on or within 10 feet of the primary street property line, public open space, or any onsite common open spaces.
4. All roof mounted equipment, including air-conditioning units and garage door motors, shall be screened from view from adjacent streets, alleys, open spaces, and neighboring properties with parapets, sloped roofs, or architectural screening that is visually integrated into the building design in terms of color, material, and form.
5. Equipment located on the ground – including air conditioning units, electrical switch gear and panels, compressors, and similar equipment – shall be screened from view from adjacent streets, alleys, open spaces, and neighboring properties with equipment enclosures designed to be consistent with the architectural design of the building.
6. All wall-mounted utility elements shall be located to ensure they are concealed from public view. All flashing, sheet metal vents, exhaust fans/ventilators, meter boxes, and similar equipment shall be painted to match the building wall material and/or color.
7. Trash, recycling, organic waste, and green waste bins and dumpsters shall be housed in a covered refuse enclosure with a gate that screens the trash receptacles. Sizing of the enclosures shall conform to solid waste provider requirements.
8. Trash enclosures shall be finished with the same primary wall material and color as the nearest building within the development and shall comply with the City of San Dimas’ Trash Enclosure Standards.
9. Trash enclosures shall have both a vehicular access gate with a concrete apron, and a pedestrian entrance. Gates shall be opaque. Access shall conform to solid waste provider requirements.
B. Guidelines
1. Trash enclosures shall include interior dusk to dawn lighting for safety and security.
2. Loading and service access areas, utilities, and trash and recycling receptacles should be located on the rear portion of a parcel or development, screened from the public right-of-way, open space, and adjacent properties. Loading and service areas should not be a hazard to or conflict with the movement of automobiles, pedestrians, or bicycles.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 97
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.8 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
5.8.1 SUSTAINABLE BUILDING DESIGN FEATURES
Sustainable practices in building design, construction practices, and maintenance will help to minimize the impact of new development on surrounding infrastructure, facilities, and the natural environment.
A. Guidelines
1. Upper stories of buildings should be designed to allow solar access, light, and air to circulate to adjacent structures, open spaces, and adjoining land uses, including windows situated to take advantage of natural light and be operable to allow residents to enjoy natural ventilation.
2. Buildings and development projects should be designed and constructed using sustainable, energy efficient materials and should incorporate strategies for the conservation of water, energy, and other natural resources.
3. White or green roofs, non-reflective coatings, low-emissivity glass, and external shade devices should be used to control heat and glare, while the use of pavement, asphalt, and other heat producing surfaces should be minimized to reduce the heat island effect.
4. Promote the use of natural light through use of large window expanses, clerestories, skylights, etc. to enhance working spaces and reduce lighting.
98 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.8.2 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
Green infrastructure is a powerful tool in the revitalization of public spaces and streetscapes and in the design of new projects. Sustainable stormwater management provides benefits including city beautification, improved human health and wellness, increased use and occupancy, higher property values, reduced pollution runoff, better water quality and biodiversity, and overall resiliency.
A. Guidelines
1. Retain and filter runoff using practices such as permeable surfaces, bioretention areas, tree filters, and underground infiltration.
2. Implement permeable pavements on-site to reduce impervious surfaces and manage runoff from adjacent impervious areas.
3. Maximize water infiltration by using natural and/or permeable materials where feasible.
4. Create areas for local water storage and treatment in strategic locations through the use of bio-swales and raingardens.
5. Development should utilize good civil and site design principles which respect and utilize the natural topography of the site to minimize the impact of stormwater runoff.
6. Bioretention and filtration strategies should be sensitive to the site context.
7. Improve the visual interest of green infrastructure design by selecting plants with different colors and blooms through all seasons and using diverse landscape forms such as boulders and channels.
8. Ensure that plants are consistent with desired vegetation management practices and the surrounding climate/microclimate.
9. Improve the pedestrian experience by implementing green infrastructure practices within streetscapes.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 99
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.9 STREET ACTIVATION
5.9.1 BUILDING/STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENTS AND KEY
INTERSECTIONS
Several key intersections present opportunities to create a strong and positive visual impact for the community. In addition to the other standards and guidelines outlined in this Chapter, the following design standards and guidelines apply to new construction and additions, as well as alterations to existing structures, located at key intersections. These intersections are:
• Bonita Avenue at San Dimas Avenue
• Bonita Avenue at Walnut Avenue
• Bonita Avenue at Eucla Avenue
• Bonita Avenue and Cataract Avenue
• Bonita Avenue at Arrow Highway
• San Dimas Avenue at Arrow Highway
A. Standards
1. New surface parking lots shall be prohibited on corner sites of key intersections in the City listed above.
2. Pedestrian amenities, such as a shaded plaza areas, generous walkways, and clear and open pedestrian linkages, shall be required to be incorporated into projects to help create a sense of place.
3. Design and construct functional plazas with a minimum area of 600 square feet with the minimum length of smallest dimension of the plaza being no less than 25 feet.
4. Entrances and pedestrian “gateways” may be announced by posts or pilasters, and may be combined with trellises, special landscaping, decorative lighting, public art, or other special features.
B. Guidelines
1. Encourage landmark qualities by installing public monumentation, themes, public signs, and art.
2. Promote special architectural elements to be incorporated on buildings, such as articulated display windows and entrances or taller, more prominent roof forms or elements.
3. Program placemaking activities and events and design identifiable elements and amenities that activate the plaza space.
100 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.9.2 RESIDENTIAL: STAND-ALONE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS OF HORIZONTAL MIXEDUSE DEVELOPMENT The transition from public sidewalk to private space is especially important when residential uses are located at the ground floor. These design standards and guidelines apply to buildings where ground-floor residential uses are permitted both in cases of new construction as well as additions or alterations to existing structures.
A. Standards
1. Transitional spaces in the form of stoops, overhangs, or porches shall be provided between public areas and entrances to new multi-family residential buildings.
2. Decorative lighting shall be provided at entries.
B. Guidelines
1. Architectural elements should be consistent with the development’s architectural style.
2. When exterior staircases are used, the staircases should be architecturally integrated and compatible with the overall building design and massing.
3. Encourage porches with a minimum five feet dimension.
4. Minimize the bulk and massing of a building length by:
a. Vertical and/or horizontal setbacks and stepbacks.
b. Changes in roof form and height.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 101
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.9.3 COMMERCIAL: STAND-ALONE COMMERCIAL AND
COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS OF MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENTS
In addition to the other standards and guidelines outlined in this Chapter, the following design standards and guidelines apply to new construction, additions, and alterations to ground-floor commercial development. Ground-floor commercial development should be inviting to the pedestrian and draw visitors into the space.
A. Standards
1. Ground floor commercial space shall be designed to orient tenant spaces to the street and to maximize storefronts and entries along sidewalks. Street-level tenant spaces that front a public street shall provide primary entrance/access from the street. Street-level tenant spaces that do not front a public street shall provide primary entrance/access from a pedestrian paseo, courtyard, or plaza.
2. A minimum of least 50 percent of the ground floor façade of commercial and mixeduse buildings fronting the public right-of-way, a pedestrian or bicycle path, or public or semi-public open space shall consist of transparent, non-reflective windows and doors allowing for a connection and interaction between individuals and activities inside and outside of the buildings.
B. Guidelines
1. Provide continuous storefront windows and highly visible articulated entries where commercial uses are located on the ground floor. Pedestrian-oriented features include:
a. Wider sidewalks
b. Building entrances and façade articulation
c. Outdoor cafes
2. Include plazas or other public/private spaces that provide areas for activity.
3. Recommend storefront configurations and details that provide a sense of human scale, variety, and interest within the overall context of the buildings.
4. Encourage ground-floor nonresidential space to wrap the corner onto the intersecting streets.
102 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.9.4 VERTICAL MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
In addition to the other standards and guidelines outlined in this Chapter, the following vertical mixed-use design standards and guidelines apply to new construction, additions, and alterations. Mixed-use development plays a vital role in creating neighborhoods where people can walk between home, work, shopping, and recreation. The primary design issue related to mixed-use projects is the need to successfully balance the requirements of residential uses (such as the need for privacy and security) with the needs of non-residential uses for access, visibility, parking, loading, and the possibility of extended hours of operation. Storefronts should be characterized by continuous building frontages and with awnings over the pedestrian walkway. Mixed-use development should result in the formation of a focal point for retail, office, entertainment, recreation, and community-related activities for the immediate area.
A. Standards
1. Differentiate residential and non-residential vehicular and pedestrian access with paving material, color, landscape buffers, etc.
2. Provide distinctive signs for identification and guidance, appropriate to each use.
3. Focus lighting, including reflected light, so that residential areas receive minimum glare.
4. Add noise-attenuating protection between floors and between units for noise-sensitive uses and to provide privacy for residential areas.
5. Design public spaces to be clearly recognizable as “public” (e.g., a plaza within view of a street or other public space) and publicly accessible.
Design private spaces to be clearly recognizable as “private” using gates and signs.
6. Screen private open space areas from public view using landscaping, walls, fences, and changes in elevation.
7. Design or locate public or semi-public spaces to encourage yearround use by providing areas that have awnings, sunshades, and/or landscaping that can provide shelter from the elements.
B. Guidelines
1. Orient uses to facilitate proper transitions to surrounding buildings and adjacent uses.
2. Use landscape features to highlight individual uses.
3. Encourage the overall design palette to include building materials and textures that define each use as part of an overall theme.
4. Design areas to encourage informal meetings and social interaction with other people.
5. Promote visual connections between spaces and uses to be provided within a development, including pedestrian linkages throughout the development and to adjacent land uses.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 103
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND ADAPTIVE REUSE
The Specific Plan area, and especially the Town Core sub-area, encompasses the historic downtown center of San Dimas. The pattern and scale of development in the historic core is oriented to pedestrian usage. Buildings are constructed without front or side setbacks, creating a continuous edge along Bonita Avenue. Parking is provided behind buildings in inner block parking areas which are not visible from Bonita Avenue. Many of the buildings on Bonita Avenue are of historic importance to the town. Building heights, proportions, and rhythms are coordinated, and the buildings work in concert to form a heterogeneous and pleasing streetscape. New construction has respected the pattern of development set up by the historic fabric and contributes to the pedestrian qualities of the area.
While the City of San Dimas does not currently have a stand-alone historic preservation ordinance, the City does maintain a historic inventory list and has processes in place under SDMC 18.12 for evaluation of proposed additions to, modifications to, or demolitions of structures listed within the City’s Historic Survey List. Community pride in historic resources and historic preservation has been a clearly expressed community value throughout the public outreach process. Furthermore, historic resources are protected under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
5.10.1 ADAPTIVE REUSE
Adapting historic buildings to accommodate new uses, in which minimal changes are made to the structure and the historic integrity of the structure is maintained, is preferred over the significant alteration or demolition of that resource. A historic resource that is altered to support a new use shall:
A. Comply with the permitted and conditionally permitted use standards for the area in which the structure is located, pursuant to Section C (Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses) and Table 5-1 (Permitted Land Uses) of this Chapter; and, B. Comply with the requirements of Section 5.10.2 on the following page.
104 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.10.2 STANDARDS FOR ALTERATIONS TO HISTORIC RESOURCES
The following standards shall apply to the alteration and/or adaptive reuse of the structures on the inventory list of the City of San Dimas and as may be added to over time.
A. A historic building should be used as it was historically or given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships.
B. The historic character of a property should be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property shall be avoided.
C. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, shall not be undertaken. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved.
D. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved.
E. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of the deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture and where possible, materials.
F. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.
G. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used.
H. Archaeological resources shall be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 105
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 5
5.10.3 GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT ON SITES WITHIN THE
TOWN CORE AREA AND FOR SITES THROUGHOUT THE
PLAN AREA WHICH ARE ADJACENT TO SITES LISTED ON
CITY’S HISTORIC INVENTORY LIST.
A. Development Within Town Core. New development which is located within the Town Core should be particularly sensitive to the existing, established, historic building form and block patterns. The pattern and scale of development in the historic core should be oriented to pedestrian usage. Buildings should be constructed without front or side setbacks, with the exception of pedestrian walkways to interior courtyards or rear parking areas, and create a continuous edge along Bonita Avenue.
Parking should be provided behind buildings in inner block parking areas which are not visible from Bonita Avenue.
B. New Development Which Is Located Adjacent to Buildings on the City’s Historic Inventory List. Throughout the entire plan area, new development which is located adjacent to sites on the City’s historic inventory list should be especially sensitive to surrounding historic resources, and should utilize appropriate transitions, massing, and scale to avoid overwhelming and dominating historic buildings.
106 SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
MOBILITY
CHAPTER 6
SAN DIMAS DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 6:
MOBILITY
6.1 Introduction.......................................................................107
6.2 Mobility Strategies............................................................108
6.3 Street Network ..................................................................110
6.4 Transit Circulation..............................................................132
6.5 Pedestrian Circulation .......................................................136
6.6 Bicycle Circulation .............................................................140
6.7 Signage and Wayfinding....................................................144
6.8 Parking...............................................................................146
DRAFT NOVEMBER 2023 107
MOBILITY
CHAPTER 6
6.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter describes the circulation improvements needed to support multimodal mobility within the Specific Plan Area.
The development of the new San Dimas Metro A Line (formerly Gold Line) station, along with other current planning efforts focused on complete streets, provides an opportunity to reduce traffic congestion and greenhouse gases, decrease automobile dependency, encourage transit-oriented development (TOD), and improve multimodal connectivity and first-last mile strategies in Downtown San Dimas and the surrounding region.
With the A Line station under construction, the Specific Plan area is set to provide access to the larger light rail network in Los Angeles County, along with existing local bus service. While the core of Downtown San Dimas is a relatively walkable area, the auto-centric design of the surrounding network, including its location just east of State Route 57, creates a challenge in meeting the needs of both motorized and non-motorized modes of transportation, while supporting connections to the new A Line station.
This chapter examines the existing conditions of the Specific Plan area in terms of the overall street network, transit circulation, pedestrian and bicycle circulation, and parking. It also proposes strategies and recommendations to enhance multimodal design for all users.
Key Concepts:
Multimodal mobility is a circulation and
transportation approach which encompasses multiple modes of movement. The approach seeks not to prioritize private cars, but to consider multiple transportation options including private vehicles, ride and car sharing, public transit including both rail and buses, bicycling, and walking. Oftentimes, multiple modes of transportation may be used for one trip; for example, driving one’s personal vehicle to a transit station parking lot, then taking a bus or train to another location or city in which one is employed, and then walking a quarter of a mile to one’s place of employment.
In support of promoting multimodal mobility,
current planning efforts are already geared towards providing “complete streets,” which are streets designed and operated to enable safe use and support mobility for all users. Those include people of all ages and abilities, regardless of whether they are travelling as drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, or public transportation riders. The concept of Complete Streets encompasses many approaches to planning, designing, and operating roadways and rights-of-way with all users in mind to make the transportation network safer and more efficient.
Complete Street policies are set at the state, regional, and local levels and are frequently supported by roadway design guidelines. Complete Streets approaches vary based on community context. They may address a wide range of elements, such as sidewalks, bicycle lanes, bus lanes, public transportation stops, crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, modified vehicle travel lanes, streetscape, and landscape treatments.
The “first/last mile connection” refers to the trips
public transit users take for their first and last mile before or after engaging with public transit- how people get to and from a bus stop, rail station, etc. The regional transportation authority- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro)- which will be responsible for the new A Line station has been and is currently making a focused effort to improve access around transit stations and stops specifically for riders who walk, bike, or roll (using scooters, skateboards, etc.) to and from their nearest station or bus stop.
Multimodal Mobility
Complete Streets
First/Last Mile