SECTION 4.17 – TRANSPORTATION
Allen Avenue on the southwest. All onsite access and sight-distance setbacks would be in accordance with the City of San Dimas and Caltrans design requirements. The project would not substantially alter or impact roads, sightlines or offsite land uses. The proposed project would not house or utilize farm equipment, construction equipment, or other unusually slow vehicles that would present a traffic hazard. Therefore, the project would not increase hazards due to a geometric design feature, and traffic hazard impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less than Significant Impact
Construction
During the project construction phase, lanes and sidewalks may be temporarily closed off. To ensure that circulation and emergency access during construction are adequate, the City requires the application for and approval of a Public Works Encroachment Permit for all projects that require construction in the public right-of-way. The Engineering Division reviews and inspects development proposals and compliance with city policies, procedures, codes, standards, and other governmental requirements relating to public improvement within the city right-of-way and transportation matters. Based on the approval of the Public Works Encroachment Permit, during construction, the project will have less than significant impact on emergency access.
Operation
The project would comply with applicable City regulations, such as the requirement to comply with the City’s Fire Code concerning providing adequate emergency access, as well as the California Building Standards Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City of San Dimas would review project site plans, including the location of all buildings, fences, access driveways, and other features that may affect emergency access. Fire lanes would be provided for adequate emergency access. The site design for the proposed project includes access and fire lanes that would accommodate emergency ingress and egress by fire trucks, police units, and ambulance/paramedic vehicles. All onsite access and sight-distance requirements would be in accordance with the City’s and Caltrans design requirements. The City’s review process and compliance with applicable regulations and standards would ensure that adequate emergency access would be provided at the project site at all times. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in inadequate emergency access and there would be no impacts in this regard.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.18 – TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact Would the project:
Incorporated
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources
Code section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that
is geographically defined in terms of
the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native American
tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register
of historical resources as defined
in Public Resources Code
X
section 5020.1(k)?
ii) A resource determined by the
lead agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1.
In applying the criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of Public
X
Resource Code Section 5024.1,
the lead agency shall consider
the significance of the resource
to a California Native American
tribe.
4.18.1 Methods
Information from the Phase I Cultural Resources Inventory Report, dated January 22, 2023 (see Appendix D1), prepared by UltraSystems for the Allen / Cataract Warehouse Project has been used to prepare the analysis in this section.
The cultural resources report describes the research for and analysis of potential cultural resources data conducted for the project. This research included cultural resources record search at the SCCIC, a SLF record search by the NAHC, and a pedestrian survey assessment (see Section 4.5). No prehistoric archaeological resources were observed during the field survey. The cultural resources record search at the SCCIC indicated no prehistoric resources recorded within the project boundary.
Previous prehistoric cultural resources surveys within the 0.5-mile radius resulted in no prehistoric archaeological sites or isolates being recorded. The cultural resource study findings at the SCCIC suggest that there is a low potential for finding prehistoric resources. 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.18 – TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
One potential resource (as defined by Public Resources Code § 21074) has been noted (refer to “NAHC Sacred Land File Records Search” in Appendix D1 of this IS/MND). A Traditional Cultural Resource (TCR) site was documented within a 0.5-mile radius of the project site in the NAHC’s SLF search, though its location and description were not provided.
As discussed in Section 4.5, the NAHC recommended contacting the Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation to learn further information about the SLF site. Therefore, UltraSystems sent a letter to the Gabrielino-Kizh Nation, along with the other ten tribal contacts provided by the NAHC.
However, neither the Gabrielino – Kizh Nation nor any of the other local tribal organizations responded with information regarding this SLF resource. a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
No Impact
The Cultural Resources investigation determined that there are no TCRs listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR or local historical registers as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k) within the project site or within a 0.5-mile radius surrounding the project site. Therefore, no impact would occur.
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) requires meaningful consultation with California Native American Tribes regarding potential impacts on TCRs, as defined in Public Resources Code § 21074. TCRs are sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either eligible or listed in the California Register of Historical Resources or local register of historical resources (California Natural Resources Agency [CNRA], 2007).
As part of the AB 52 process, Native American tribes must submit a written request to a lead agency to be notified of projects within their traditionally and culturally affiliated area. The lead agency must provide written, formal notification to those tribes within 14 days of deciding to undertake a project.
The tribe must respond to the lead agency within 30 days of receiving this notification if they want to engage in consultation on the project, and the lead agency must begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving the tribe’s request. Consultation concludes when either (1) the parties 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.18 – TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
agree to mitigation measures (MMs) to avoid a significant effect on a TCR, or (2) a party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes mutual agreement cannot be reached.
In compliance with AB 52, letters were sent by the City of San Dimas’ Community Development Department (City) to all applicable Native American Tribes. Anne Nguyen, Associate Planner with the Community Development Department, has taken the lead for this process. The letters were sent July 21, 2022 by certified mail to the following tribes:
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation,
Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians,
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians
Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians
The City received a reply from the Gabrieleno – Kizh Nation on July 25, 2022 by email with an attached letter requesting consultation. Ms. Nguyen responded to the Gabrieleno – Kizh Nation requesting an available date and time for consultation. A consultation teleconference call between the City and the Gabrieleno – Kizh Nation was conducted August 18, 2022. The Kizh Nation provided a letter and suggested mitigation measures on September 12, 2022. Ms. Nguyen provided revisions to the Gabrieleno – Kizh Nation suggested mitigation measures. The City received a reply by the Gabrieleno – Kizh Nation on October 26, 2022 by email with an attached letter requesting the suggested mitigation measures provided on September 12, 2022 be incorporated as is without any changes. An additional consultation teleconference call between the City and the Gabrieleno – Kizh Nation was conducted on November 9, 2022. Ms. Nguyen eliminated some of the changes that were made to the Gabrieleno – Kizh Nation suggested mitigation measures. Following review by Ms.
Nguyen and the San Dimas City’s attorney, it was determined that the Kizh Nation suggested mitigation measures would be incorporated as applies only to the Gabrielino - Kizh Nation if they are chosen as the Native American monitors for the project and, should human remains be discovered and if the NAHC should chose the Kizh Nation to be the Most Likely Descendants (MLD). Following review of the recommended mitigation measure language from the City, the Kizh Nation approved it via email from their Admin Specialist on January 9, 2023 and consultation with the Gabrielino - Kizh Nation was concluded (A. Nguyen, personal communication; January 9, 2023).
The remaining three tribes did not reply to the City within the 30-day response period nor have they to date. With this, AB 52 consultation has been concluded (except the continued discussions with the Gabrielino – Kizh Nation described above) (A. Nguyen, personal communication; September 15, 2022).
A potential resource as defined by Public Resources Code § 21074 has been noted (Attachment C:
“NAHC Sacred Land File Records Search” in Appendix D1 to this Initial Study). During UltraSystems’ cultural resources study, outreach to the NAHC determined that a traditional cultural site was documented within a half-mile radius of the project site in the NAHC’s SLF search, though its location and description were not provided. The NAHC recommended that UltraSystems contact the Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation to learn further information about the SLF site. A letter was sent to Gabrielino-Kizh Nation on November 2, 2021 asking about the SLF site (Appendix D1). An email was received on November 19, 2021 from Admin Specialist Monica Cano of the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation, indicating that the project location is within their Ancestral Tribal Territory and that the Tribal Government requests to schedule a consultation with UEI as the lead agency. Mr. O’Neil responded on the same day indicating that our letter was in regards to the cultural resources study to inform you of the project and not AB 52 consultation. Ms. Cano 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.18 – TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
responded on the same day that this email was being forwarded to “Anne” (No last name provided).
There was no further response from the Gabrielino – Kizh Nation to UltraSystems regarding the SLF site.
No prehistoric archaeological resources were observed during the field survey. The previous cultural resources surveys within the 0.5-mile radius resulted in no archaeological sites or isolates being recorded. During the cultural resources record search at the SCCIC, no prehistoric resources were found. The results of the pedestrian assessment indicate it is highly unlikely that prehistoric properties will be adversely affected by construction of the project. The cultural resource study findings at the SCCIC suggest that there is a low potential for finding prehistoric resources.
Mitigation for minimizing impacts on potential TCRs is applicable to the project site because the land at the site was used for agriculture and mid-twentieth century farm homes that caused minimal subsurface disturbance during construction. Even with the minimal disturbance, the potential for subsurface prehistoric deposits is considered to be low.
However, given local Native American tribal concerns for potential traditional cultural resources present at the project site, mitigation would be implemented to further reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. See Mitigation Measures TCR MM-1 through TCR MM-3 below as they pertain to the Gabrielino - Kizh Nation only. The applicable mitigation measures TCR MM-4 through TCR MM-7 concern protection of TCRs and potential human remains as they relate to culturally affiliated Tonga (but non-Gabrielino – Kizh Nation) bands are also provided below.
Mitigation Measure
MM TCR-1: Retain a Native American Monitor Prior to Commencement of GroundDisturbing Activities A. The project applicant/lead agency shall retain a Native American Monitor from or approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. The monitor shall be retained prior to the commencement of any “ground-disturbing activity” for the subject project at all project locations (i.e., both on-site and any off-site locations that are included in the project description/definition and/or required in connection with the project, such as public improvement work). “Ground-disturbing activity” shall include, but is not limited to, demolition, pavement removal, potholing, auguring, grubbing, tree removal, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching into native soil and undocumented soils. The monitor(s) will continue their duties until it is determined through consultation with the permittee, City Planning, that monitoring is no longer warranted.
B. A copy of the executed monitoring agreement shall be submitted to the lead agency prior to the earlier of the commencement of any ground-disturbing activity, or the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity.
C. The monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the relevant ground-disturbing activities, the type of construction activities performed, locations of ground-disturbing activities, soil types, cultural-related materials, and any other facts, conditions, materials, or discoveries of significance to the Tribe. Monitor logs will identify and describe any discovered TCRs, including but not limited to, Native American cultural and historical artifacts, remains, places of significance, etc., (collectively, tribal cultural resources, or “TCR”), as well as any 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.18 – TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
discovered Native American (ancestral) human remains and burial goods. Copies of monitor logs will be provided to the project applicant/lead agency upon written request to the Tribe.
D. On-site tribal monitoring shall conclude upon the latter of the following (1) written confirmation to the Kizh from a designated point of contact for the project applicant/lead agency that all ground-disturbing activities and phases that may involve ground-disturbing activities on the project site or in connection with the project are complete; or (2) a determination and written notification by the Kizh to the project applicant/lead agency that no future, planned construction activity and/or development/construction phase at the project site possesses the potential to impact Kizh TCRs.
E. Upon discovery of any TCRs, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not less than the surrounding 50 feet) and the City notified. Construction activities may continue in other areas outside of the designated protection zone, which shall be delineated with cones, flagging, or fencing. The designated Kizh monitor and/or Kizh archaeologist shall evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether the resource uncovered is a TCR. If its determined that the potential resource is a TCR (as defined by PRC, Section 21074), tribes consulting under AB 52 would be provided a reasonable period of time, typically 5 days from the date of a new discovery is made, to conduct a site visit and make recommendations regarding future ground disturbance activities as well as the treatment of any discovered TCRs. The designated tribe monitor/archaeologist shall implement a plan for the treatment and disposition of any discovered TCRs based on the nature of the resource and considering the recommendations of the tribe(s).
Implementation of proposed recommendations will be made based on the determination of the City that the approach is reasonable and feasible. The Kizh will recover and retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe’s sole discretion, and for any purpose the Tribe deems appropriate, including for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes.
MM TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects A. Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness.
Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.
B. If Native American human remains and/or grave goods discovered or recognized on the project site, then all construction activities shall immediately cease. Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and all ground-disturbing activities shall immediately halt and shall remain halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe they are Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission, and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 shall be followed.
C. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2).
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.18 – TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
D. Construction activities may resume in other parts of the project site at a minimum of 200 feet away from discovered human remains and/or burial goods, if the Kizh determines in its sole discretion that resuming construction activities at that distance is acceptable and provides the project manager express consent of that determination (along with any other mitigation measures the Kizh monitor and/or archaeologist deems necessary). (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f).) E. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment for discovered human remains and/or burial goods. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin (non-TCR) shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes.
F. Any discovery of human remains/burial goods shall be kept confidential to prevent further disturbance.
MM TCR -3: Procedures for Burials and Funerary Remains:
A. As the Most Likely Descendant (“MLD”), the Koo-nas-gna Burial Policy shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the preparation of the soil for burial, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains.
B. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the discovery location shall be treated as a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.
C. The prepared soil and cremation soils are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all sacred materials.
D. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed.
E. In the event preservation in place is not possible despite good faith efforts by the project applicant/developer and/or landowner, before ground-disturbing activities may resume on the project site, the landowner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Construction activities may continue in other areas outside of the designated protection zone, which shall be delineated with cones, flagging, or fencing.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.18 – TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
F. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible.
These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered.
G. The Tribe will work closely with the project’s qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be prepared and shall include (at a minimum) detailed descriptive notes and sketches. All data recovery data recoveryrelated forms of documentation shall be approved in advance by the Tribe. If any data recovery is performed, once complete, a final report shall be submitted to the applicant, the City, the South Central Coastal Information Center, the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or destructive diagnostics on human remains.
MM TCR-4:
MM TCR-5:
Prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activity at the project site, the project applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor from a local culturallyaffiliated Gabrielino (Tongva) tribe. A copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of San Dimas Planning Division prior to the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity.
The Tribal monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Tribe as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The onsite monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project Site are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground-disturbing activities at the Project Site have little to no potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources.
MM TCR-6:
MM TCR-7:
Upon discovery of a Tribal Cultural Resource, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 60 feet) until the find can be assessed. All Tribal Cultural Resources unearthed by project activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor as described in TCR MM4. If the resources are Native American in origin, the monitoring Tribe may retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes.
If human remains are encountered during excavations associated with this project, all work shall stop within a 60-foot radius of the discovery and the Los Angeles County Coroner will be notified (§ 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). The Coroner will determine whether the remains are recent human origin or older Native American ancestry. If the coroner, with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistoric, they will contact the 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.18 – TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
NAHC. The NAHC will be responsible for designating the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLDS (either an individual or sometimes a committee) will be responsible for the ultimate disposition of the remains, as required by § 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The MLD will make recommendations within 24 hours of their notification by the NAHC. These recommendations may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials (§ 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code).
Level of Significance After Mitigation
Mitigation measures TCR-1 through TCR-3 pertain to the Gabrielino – Kizh Nation if they are chosen to conduct tribal monitoring and if they are chosen to be the MLD by the NAHC, if human remains are discovered. Mitigation measures TCR-4 through TCR -7 pertain if a different Gabrielino (Tongva) tribe is chosen to conduct the tribal monitoring and if they are chosen to be the MLD by the NAHC, should human remains be discovered. These MMs require monitoring of ground-disturbing activities during project construction by a Native American monitor; halting construction activities if unanticipated discovery of a TCR or historic artifact(s) and their evaluation by the Native American and a qualified archaeologist, describe treatment of human remains if found, and the disposition of TCRs and historic artifacts if found. With implementation of MMs TCR-1 through TCR-7, potential project impacts on TCRs would be less than significant. 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.19 – UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
4.19 Utilities and Service Systems
Less than
Potentially
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Significant Less than No
Impact Would the project:
Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or stormwater
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
X
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry, and
multiple dry years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may
serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
X
X
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, in excess of the capacity of
local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
X
X
a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Less than Significant Impact
Water Treatment: As detailed below, there would be sufficient water supplies to serve the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not require new or expanded water facilities. The project would have a less than significant impact in this regard.
Wastewater Treatment: Wastewater from San Dimas is conveyed by sewers owned by the City of San Dimas and the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) to LACSD’s San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (SJCWRP) in the Community of Avocado Heights in unincorporated Los Angeles County (Stetson, 2021), approximately 13 miles southwest of the project site. The SJCWRP has a capacity of 100 million gallons per day (mgd). Average effluent flows in 2020 were 48.2 mgd (LACSD, 2021) and the residual capacity is 51.8 mgd. Project operation is estimated to generate 9,562 gallons of wastewater per day, as shown below in Table 4.19-1.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.19 – UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Table 4.19-1
ESTIMATED PROJECT WASTEWATER GENERATION
Wastewater Generation (gallons) Land Use Square Feet Per square 1,000 sq. ft.1
0.15 Total
Light Manufacturing 63,749 9,562.35
1 Source: LACSD, 2021b
The project proposes to install new sanitary sewers to serve the entire development to the specifications of the City Engineer and Los Angeles County Sewer Maintenance. All existing on-site sewer/septic systems shall be abandoned by a method approved by the City Engineer. The new system shall connect the sewer lines from the project site to the existing sewer network on Cataract Avenue. All sewer line sizes and connections are subject to review by the City. The project applicant will work with the City’s Public Works Department for necessary approvals and ensure compliance with applicable requirements. No new treatment facilities or expanded entitlements will be required.
Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact on wastewater treatment.
Stormwater Drainage:
The California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), Los Angeles Regional Control Board, Region #4 (aka. Los Angeles Region Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB)) is one of nine Regional Boards statewide. These Boards are part of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CAL/EPA). The LARWQCB has adopted the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS4 Permit) (Order No. R4-2012-0175).
The NPDES/MS4 Permit required that the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, the County of Los Angeles, and 84 other municipalities (including San Dimas) within the County of Los Angeles comply with the prescribed elements of the MS4 Permit. San Dimas and a few other member agencies agreed to collaborate on the compliance of certain elements of the MS4 Permit and agreed to a costsharing formula based on the land area within the San Gabriel Watershed. The faction is known as the East San Gabriel Valley Watershed Management Group (ESGVWMG). The ESGVWMG consists of the City of La Verne, as the coordinating agency for the Watershed Management Plan and Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program, and the cities of Claremont, Pomona, and San Dimas. The Program regulates, through Order No. R4-2012-0175, the discharge of pollutants into the Waters of the U.S. through stormwater and urban runoff conveyance systems, including flood control facilities.
The project would be required by the California SWRCB to obtain coverage under a General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) (Order 2009-0009-DWQ) as authorized by Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The project would be required to obtain an NPDES permit, prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) prior to the commencement of construction activities; additionally, BMPs must be maintained, inspected after each precipitation event, and repaired or replaced as necessary.
Project compliance with regulatory requirements would reduce potential erosion/siltation impacts during the construction phase of the project to a less than significant level. The proposed project would be designed in compliance with applicable City of San Dimas regulations regarding stormwater runoff and the project would be reviewed by the City of San Dimas Public Works Department to ensure that the development would not create or contribute to runoff water that 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.19 – UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. Refer to Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, for additional information.
Electric Power: Electric power for the City of San Dimas is provided by Southern California Edison (SCE). The proposed project is located in a developed area, and the infrastructure for providing electric power to the area is well established. SCE typically utilizes existing utility corridors to reduce environmental impacts and has energy-efficiency programs to reduce energy usage and maintain reliable service throughout the year (SCE, 2020). The project would be constructed in accordance with applicable Title 24 regulations, and would not necessitate the construction or relocation of electric power facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur.
Natural Gas: The Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) is the primary distributor of retail and wholesale natural gas across Southern California, including the City of San Dimas. SoCalGas provides services to residential, commercial, and industrial consumers, and also provides gas for electric generation customers. In its 2018 California Gas Report, SoCalGas analyzed an 18-year demand period, from 2018 to 2035, to determine its ability to meet projected demand (California Gas and Electric Utilities, 2018. p. 63).
SoCalGas expects total gas demand to decline 0.74 percent annually from 2018 to 2035 as a result of energy-efficiency standards and programs, renewable electricity goals, modest economic growth in its service region, and advanced metering infrastructure (California Gas and Electric Utilities, 2018, p. 66). Transportation-related industrial uses account for 2.7% of total industrial gas demand, and the proposed project is not of the size or scope to increase this demand (California Gas and Electric Utilities, 2018, p. 73). Moreover, SoCalGas plans on implementing aggressive energy-efficiency programs that will result in natural gas savings across all sectors that will ensure the longevity of its natural gas supplies and adequate generation rates (California Gas and Electric Utilities, 2018, p. 78).
Therefore, the anticipated natural gas supply is adequate to meet demand in the SoCalGas region, and the proposed project is not expected to impact this determination. Thus, no natural gas facilities would have to be constructed or relocated, and a less than significant impact would occur.
Telecommunications Facilities: Telecommunication services, including internet, phone, and television, for the City of San Dimas, are provided by Spectrum and Frontier Communications. The proposed project would not interfere with the operation of these services, and a less than significant impact would occur.
b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
Less than Significant Impact
As detailed further in Section 4.10, the project site lies within the service area of the Golden State Water Company (GSWC). GSWC’s 2020 UWMP (or 2020 Plan) was prepared consistent with the CWC and the recommended organization provided in DWR’s Final “Urban Water Management Plan Guidebook 2020” (Final 2020 UWMP Guidebook), dated March 2021. GSWC’s 2020 Plan was prepared in coordination with planning agencies including the Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
GSWC is a sub-agency of Three Valleys Municipal Water District (TVMWD), a wholesale water agency.
TVMWD prepared a 2020 Plan which is incorporated in GSWC’s 2020 Plan by reference. In addition, 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.19 – UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
GSWC provided its 2020 Plan to TVMWD which includes water use projections in five-year increments for a normal year, a single dry year, and five consecutive years of drought conditions over the next 25 years (Stetson, 2021, p. 6-3).
GSWC water is a blend of groundwater pumped from the Main San Gabriel Basin and purchased water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and Three Valleys Municipal Water District; treated groundwater and surface water purchased from Covina Irrigating Company; treated water purchased from Walnut Valley Water District; and local surface water from San Dimas Canyon Creek. GSWC’s main source of water supply is groundwater pumped from the Main Basin (Stetson, 2021, p. 6-1).
Information regarding the reliability of GSWC’s water supplies is based on the historical precipitation data in the San Gabriel Valley. Historical annual precipitation in the San Gabriel Valley is based on data collected from Station 047050 (Pomona Fairplex, California). Furthermore, potential future climate change impacts may increase the average annual precipitation within GSWC’s service area, thus indicating the use of historical data is a reasonable and conservative approach. The historical average rainfall in the vicinity of GSWC’s service area is 17.2 inches.
During normal and wet years, the GSWC’s 2020 UWMP uses the Main Basin water for groundwater recharge. The total freshwater storage capacity of the Main Basin is estimated to be about 9.5 million acre-feet. Of that, about 1.1 million acre-feet have been used historically in Main Basin operations.
One foot of elevation change is roughly the equivalent of about 8,000 acre-feet of water storage. The historical high groundwater elevation was recorded at over 329.1 feet in April 1916, at which time Main Basin storage was estimated to be about 8.7 million acre-feet. The historical low was recorded in November 2018 at 169.4 feet, at which time Main Basin storage was estimated to be about 7.4 million acre-feet (Stetson, 2021, p. 6-20).
GSWC has emergency interties (or interconnections) with other water agencies that serve as shortterm emergency water supplies. Emergency interconnections are distribution system interconnections between water agencies for use during critical situations where one system or the other is temporarily unable to provide sufficient potable water to meet its water demands and/or fire protection needs. An emergency interconnection will allow a water system to continue serving water during critical situations such as local water supply shortages as a result of earthquakes, fires, prolonged power outages, and droughts (Stetson, 2021, p. 6-49).
Additionally, the GSWC would implement the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Water Conservation and Rationing Plan (CPUC, 2022), which is separated into four stages of water rationing. In each of the water rationing levels, different restrictions would limit the use of water use as detailed in Table 4.19-1. To determine the reliability of its water supplies, GSVW analyzed anticipated water supply and demand for normal, dry, and multiple dry years. These analyses totaled the amount of water expected from each of its supplies during various types of years, and compared them with anticipated demand, accounting for water conservation policies to be implemented in dry years. As shown in Tables 4.19-2, 4.19-3, and 4.19-4 below, water supplies are adequate to meet projected demand in normal, dry, and multiple dry years. 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.19 – UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Table 4.19-1
WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING LEVELS
Percent
Shortage
Range
Shortage
Level Shortage Response action (Narrative description)
Watering or irrigating is limited to a maximum of 2 days per week. All outdoor irrigation must occur between 9 a.m. or after 5 p.m. GSWC will change the number of watering days and the specific days of watering after notification in accordance with CPUC Rule 14.1.
In addition, to Shortage Level 1, allocations will be based on the 2013 baseline of less than 32 percent. No allocation will be less than 8 Ccf/month or 16 Ccf/bi-monthly billing periods. Users in excess of allocation will be charged a regular rate plus $2.50 per Ccf.
1 2
Up to 10%
Up to 20%
In addition, to Shortage Level 2, GSWC may add actions if conditions warrant including, but not limited to, increasing the number of watering days and the specific days of watering in accordance with CPUC Rule 14.1.
In addition, to Shortage Level 3, users in excess of allocation will be charged a regular rate plus $5.00 per Ccf.
In addition, to Shortage Level 4, GSWC may add actions if conditions warrant including, but not limited to, increasing the number of watering days and the specific days of watering in accordance with CPUC Rule 14.1.
In addition, to Shortage Level 5, users in excess of allocation will be charged a regular rate plus $10.00 per Ccf.
3 4
5 6
Up to 30%
Up to 40%
Up to 50%
Up to 60%
Source: Golden State Water Company- San Dimas System 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Table 8-1 Table 4.19-2
NORMAL YEAR SUPPLY AND DEMAND COMPARISON
Totals 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Supply Totals
Demand Totals
Difference
10,753
10,753
0 10,796
10,796
0 10,840
10,840
0 10,883
10,883
0 10,927
10,927
0 *Volumes are in acre-feet (AF).
Source: Golden State Water Company- San Dimas System 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Table 7-2 Table 4.19-3
SINGLE DRY YEAR SUPPLY AND DEMAND COMPARISON
Totals 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Supply Totals
Demand Totals
Difference
10,402
10,402
0 10,444
10,444
0 10,485
10,485
0 10,527
10,527
0 10, 569
10, 569
0 *Volumes are in acre-feet (AF).
Source: Golden State Water Company- San Dimas System 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Table 7-3 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.19 – UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Table 4.19-4
MULTIPLE DRY YEARS SUPPLY AND DEMAND COMPARISON
Year Totals 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Supply Totals
Demand Totals
Difference
Supply Totals
Demand Totals
Difference
Supply Totals
Demand Totals
Difference
Supply Totals
Demand Totals
Difference
33,030
22,879
10,151
33,030
20,799
12,231
33,030
18,719
14,311
11,983
11,983
0 38,530
24,481
14,049
38,530
22,256
16,274
38,530
20,030
18,500
12,031
12,031
0 42,030
26,183
15,847
42,030
23,802
18,228
42,030
21,422
20,608
12,079
12,079
0 45,030
28,041
16,989
45,030
25,492
19,538
45,030
22,943
22,087
12,127
12,127
0 45,030
30,043
14,987
45,030
27,312
17,718
45,030
24,580
20,450
12,175
12,175
0 First Year
Second Year
Third Year
Fourth Year
Fifth Year
Supply Totals
Demand Totals
Difference
9,359
9,359
0 9,397
9,397
0 9,434
9,434
0 9,472
9,472
0 9,510
9,510
0 *Volumes are in acre-feet (AF).
Source: Golden State Water Company- San Dimas System 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Table 7-4 Moreover, although the project would use water during project operation, increased water usage from projects such as the proposed project has been accounted for in the latest UWMP prepared for GSWC. The UWMP found that with its current water supplies, planned future water supplies, and water conservation, GSWC will be able to reliably provide water to its customers. Although a minor increase in the water demand could occur as a result of the project, the increase would not be significant because adequate water supplies and facilities are available to serve the proposed project, and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years.
Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated. c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less than Significant Impact
As described above, the volume of wastewater generated by the project represents only a small fraction of the existing daily capacity of the wastewater treatment facility providing service in the area. Therefore, the wastewater anticipated to be generated by the project would be within the existing capacity of the wastewater treatment provider and less than significant impacts would occur. d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Less than Significant Impact
Solid waste disposal services for San Dimas are provided by Waste Management. The City contracts with Waste Management for curbside and business trash collection and recycling services, including 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.19 – UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
green waste recycling. Currently, green waste is taken to the Puente Hills Landfill located in Whitter, recyclables are taken to the Allen Company in Baldwin Park, and bulk waste is transferred to El Sobrante Landfill in Corona (WM, 2022).
The current permitted solid waste disposal at the El Sobrante Landfill is 16,054 tons per day (Riverside County, 2022). The Annual Status Report reported 128.6 million tons remaining at the end of 2020. At the current rate, this equates to approximately 35 years of site life remaining (El Sobrante Landfill, 2020).
Project construction and operation would generate solid waste requiring disposal at local landfills.
Materials generated during the construction of the project would include paper, cardboard, metal, plastics, glass, concrete, lumber scraps, and other materials. During construction (short-term) and operation (long-term), bulk solid waste, excess building material, fill, and other construction-related solid waste would be disposed of in a manner consistent with the State of California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (CIWMA) and would be removed from the project site. Existing regulations related to recycling during the construction and operation phases of the project require that the project would provide readily accessible areas that serve the entire building and are identified for the depositing, storage, and collection of nonhazardous materials for recycling, including (at a minimum) paper, corrugated cardboard, glass, plastics, and metals.
The project is anticipated to have 65 employees which, using the solid waste generation rate in Table 4.19-5, would result in an estimated generation of 78 tons of waste per year. As discussed above, the current permitted solid waste disposal at the El Sobrante Landfill is 16,054 tons per day.
Therefore, the project’s construction waste would represent a small fraction of the City’s landfill capacity.
Table 4.19-5
ESTIMATED PROJECT-GENERATED SOLID WASTE
Waste
(tons/year) Land Use Generation Rate1
Transportation-related
light-industrial 1.20 (tons/employee/year) 78
1 Cal Recycle, 2015. 2014 Generator-Based Characterization of Commercial Sector Disposal and Diversion in California.
Accessed online at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/PubExtracts/2014/GenSummary.pdf on March 24, 2020.
The project’s estimated increase of 0.214 tons of waste per day represents a small fraction of the El Sobrante Landfill's daily capacity (0.0013%). Since sufficient permitted landfill capacity exists to support the operation of the proposed project, no adverse impact on either the solid waste collection service or the landfill disposal system would occur. Therefore, project impacts on existing solid waste disposal facilities would be less than significant.
e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.19 – UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Less than Significant Impact
In 1989, the California Legislature enacted the California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939), to address solid waste problems and capacities in a comprehensive manner. The law required each city and county to divert 50% of its waste from landfills by the year 2000.
The Los Angeles Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (LACIWMP) outlines the goals, policies, and programs the County and its cities would implement to create an integrated and costeffective waste management system that complies with the provisions of AB 939 and its diversion mandates. The LACIWMP outlines programs to reduce, recycle and properly divert solid waste from sanitary landfills.
The solid waste generated by the project would be collected by Waste Management, the designated waste hauler, and transported offsite to transfer facilities and landfills for reuse, recycling, and/or disposal, as appropriate (WM, 2022). Waste Management delivers solid waste to the El Sobrante Landfill, which operates under a permit from the Riverside County Department of Public Health, Solid Waste Management Division and requires regular reporting and monitors compliance.
The proposed project would comply with the LACIWMP and the City’s waste reduction procedures and comply with applicable elements of AB 1327, Chapter 18 (California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991) and other applicable local, state, and federal solid waste disposal standards, thereby ensuring that the solid waste stream to regional landfills is reduced in accordance with existing regulations. Impacts are considered less than significant. 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.20 – WILDFIRE
4.20 Wildfire
Less than If located in or near state responsibility
areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would the
project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Incorporated
a) Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
X
X
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance
of associated infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines, or other utilities)
that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including downslope or
downstream flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
X
X
A wildfire is an uncontrolled fire that spreads through vegetative fuels, posing danger and threatening life and property. Wildfires can occur in undeveloped areas and spread to urban areas, where development can be heavily concentrated. The City has foothills to the north that have steep terrain and light, flashy fuels, and the predominant weather patterns feature high temperatures and low humidity, as well as seasonal high-speed Santa Ana winds. These factors, together with many homes that are built near or in the interface zone, have created a potential for significant damage due to wildfire. Historically, most of the wildfires in the City have occurred in northwest San Dimas, with occasional fires in the San Gabriel Mountains. The City has established a Fire Hazard Overlay District in open space areas in northern San Dimas to reduce the risk of wildfire.
The project is located generally in the northern part of the City of San Dimas. The project site is not located in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone for either a Local Responsibility Area or State Responsibility Area (refer to Figures 4.20-1 and 4.20-2), (CAL FIRE, 2020). The City of San Dimas does contain areas classified as very high fire hazard severity zones (VHFHSZs) in local responsibility areas (LRAs) (CAL FIRE, 2008). There is a VHFHSZ in a local responsibility area that is approximately 0.5 miles to the north.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.20 – WILDFIRE
Figure 4.20-1
FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE – LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY AREA
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.20 – WILDFIRE
Figure 4.20-2
FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE – STATE RESPONSIBILITY AREA
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.20 – WILDFIRE
a) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Less than Significant Impact
As detailed above, the project site is not located in areas or lands classified as VHFHSZs. However, as shown in Figure 4.20-1, the project site is located 0.5 miles south of a VHFHSZ LRA. The City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) anticipates that all interstate freeways would serve as evacuation routes, and Interstate 210 is adjacent to the site, accessible from an on-ramp 0.25 mile east of the site at San Dimas Avenue. The City has accommodated continued growth and development in VHFHSZs and the proposed project would not affect the efficacy of established fire-safety plans. Since the project is not located in an SRA or LRA and development near LRAs and VHFHSZs has been accounted for in the City’s safety plans, the project would not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. A less than significant impact would occur.
b) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? Less than Significant Impact
As detailed above, the project site is not located in areas or lands classified as VHFHSZs. However, the project site is near a VHFHSZ LRA to the north. No slopes are located on the project site which could exacerbate wildfire risks. Historically, northern San Dimas has faced the majority of wildfires in the city due to slopes and Santa Ana winds blowing down from San Gabriel Mountains through San Dimas Canyon. The most damaging was the Williams Fire in September 2002, which destroyed 62 structures and burned 38,984 acres. Fires have historically been contained to this area (LAAlmanac, 2022). Therefore, the project would not expose project occupants (i.e., those working at the project site during project operations) to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. A less than significant impact would occur. c) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
Less than Significant Impact
As detailed above, the project site is not located in areas or lands classified as VHFHSZs but is near VHFHSZs located to the north. However, the project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk. As demonstrated in this document, neither construction nor operation of the project would result in significant temporary or ongoing impacts on the environment. It would be constructed in compliance with applicable building and fire codes. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact in this regard.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.20 – WILDFIRE
d) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Less than Significant Impact
As detailed above, the project site is not located in or near areas or lands classified as VHFHSZs but is near a VHFHSZ to the north. However, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. The City of San Dimas has historically experienced landslides; most recently in February 2010 along the transition road to the northbound Orange (SR57) Freeway from the San Bernardino (I-10) Freeway (CALPoly Pomona, 2022). However, there are no steep slopes or hills on the project site; the nearest hills are the San Gabriel Mountains, the foothills of which begin approximately 0.5 miles north of the project site. Project development would not exacerbate landslide hazards. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact in this regard.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.21 – MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact Does the project have:
Incorporated
a) The potential to substantially degrade
the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal X
community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Impacts that are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects)?
X
c) Environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
X
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Section 4.4 of this document addresses impacts on biological resources. The project site is located in an urbanized setting and is approximately 350 feet south of Interstate 210 (I-210). The site is surrounded by commercial properties on the west, north, and east; south of the site is a largely residential neighborhood. Although the site is less than two miles south of the Angeles National Forest, the project area and BSA provide low habitat value for special-status plant and wildlife species (including species listed by state or federal agencies as “candidate” or “sensitive” species). The reconnaissance-level biological survey conducted on January 7, 2022, determined that approximately 2.19 acres of the project site are urban developed/ornamental or non-native 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.21 – MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
grassland, both with relatively low diversity of species. The project site is surrounded by developed lands and heavily modified, non-natural landscapes. With the implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1 and BIO-2, the project would have a less than significant impact on nesting bird species as well as special-status plant and wildlife species.
Section 4.5 of this document addresses potential impacts on Cultural Resources. The project would be built on vacant land that has been previously graded Based on the cultural resource records search, it was determined that no historic cultural resources or prehistoric archeological sites have been previously recorded within the project site boundary. Within the 0.5-mile buffer zone, there is one recorded historic era cultural resource but no prehistoric archaeological sites. The result of the pedestrian survey was negative for both prehistoric sites and isolates on the project site. Based on the results of the records search and the onsite field survey, it is unlikely that cultural resources or tribal resources would be adversely affected by construction of the project. However, grading activities associated with development of the project would cause new subsurface disturbance and may result in the unanticipated discovery of unique historic and/or prehistoric archeological resources. In the event of an unanticipated discovery, implementation of mitigation measures CUL1 and CUL-2 would ensure that impacts on archeological resources would be less than significant. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less than Significant Impact
The proposed project would be consistent with regional plans and programs that address environmental factors such as air quality, water quality, and other applicable regulations that have been adopted by public agencies with jurisdiction over the project to avoid or mitigate environmental effects.
Sections 4.3 and 4.13 of this Initial Study address potential impacts related to Air Quality and Noise, respectively. As detailed in Section 4.3, air quality impacts associated with project construction and operation would be less than significant and do not warrant mitigation. As detailed in Section 4.13, construction and operational noise impacts associated with the project site were found to be less than significant and do not warrant mitigation.
The project would create employment opportunities (both during the construction and operational phases); employees from the local workforce would be hired during both the construction and operational phases of the project. The project is not of the scope or scale to induce people to move from outside of the project area to work on the proposed project. The project does not include a housing component or otherwise support an increase in the resident population of the City and would utilize existing infrastructure for its operation. Therefore, impact related to indirect population growth resulting solely from the project is expected to be less than significant. 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 4.21 – MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated The Phase I ESA report prepared for the project states that there was no Recognized Environmental Concerns (REC) were identified on the project site. However, the future tenant is unknown at this time and the use of specific hazardous materials is unknown. With the implementation of mitigation measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2, potential impacts associated with the handling of hazardous materials would be less than significant.
As discussed in Sections 4.1 through 4.20 of this document potential adverse environmental effects were found to be less than significant on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 5.0 – REFERENCES
5.0 REFERENCES
ARB (California Air Resources Board). 2016. Changes to California's Commercial Vehicle Idling Regulation. Accessed online at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020- 12/commercial_vehicle_idling_requirements_July%202016.pdf, accessed on September 28, 2022.
ARB, 2022. EMFAC (Emission Factor 2021 v1.0.2 webtool). California Air Resources Board.
Accessed online at: https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/emissionsinventory/9c58d8e2272c09ba5e63b138e60b1bddee9e5f51, on September 9, 2022.
ARB, 2022a. Maps of State and Federal Area Designations. Accessed online at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/maps-state-and-federal-areadesignations, on November 17, 2022.
Baker, R. O, & Timm, R. M. 1998. Management of conflicts between urban coyotes and humans in Southern California. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/V418110164. Retrieved from
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5064c0n7.
Bolster, B.C., 1998. Terrestrial Mammal Species of Special Concern in California.
CAPCOA, 2021. CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0. Accessed online at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/user-guide-2021/01_user-39-s-guide2020-4-0.pdf?sfvrsn=6, on August 16, 2022.
Calflora, 2022. Information on California plants for education, research and conservation.
Observation Search. Available at https://www.calflora.org/entry/observ.html. Accessed on January 28, 2022
California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11. Accessed online at:
https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Codes, on November 23, 2022.
Cal-IPC (California Invasive Plant Council). 2006. The California Invasive Plant Inventory. Cal-IPC Publication 2006-02. California Invasive Plant Council. Berkeley, California. Available at https://www.cal-ipc.org/plants/inventory/about-the-inventory/. Accessed on December 10, 2021.
CalPoly Pomona, 2022. San Dimas Landslide. Accessed online at https://polycentric.cpp.edu/2010/02/san_dimas_landslide on November 23, 2022.
CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife) 2021a. BIOS Habitat Connectivity Viewer.
Accessed at ftp://ftp.dfg.ca.gov/BDB/GIS/BIOS/Habitat_Connectivity/. Accessed on April 20, 2022.
CDFW. 2022b. California Wildlife Habitat Relationships Life History Accounts and Range Maps.
Retrieved from https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR/Life-History-and-Range. Retrieved on January 20, 2022.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 5.0 – REFERENCES
CDFW. 2022c. California Natural Community List. Available Accessed
at:
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=153609&inline. on January 11, 2022.
CEC (California Energy Commission) 2021. The 100 percent clean energy act of 2018 (Senate Bill 100). Accessed online at: https://www.energy.ca.gov/news/2021-03/california-releasesreport-charting-path-100-percent-clean-electricity on November 23, 2022.
City of San Dimas, 1991. San Dimas, California, Municipal Code Title 18, Zoning, Chapter 18.128 Industrial Zones. Available at
http://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/acwm/216023_SanDimasMC.pdf. Accessed on January 7, 2022.
City of San Dimas. 2006. San Dimas Municipal Code. Title 18: Zoning. Chapter 18.162: Tree Preservation. Available at
http://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/acwm/216023_SanDimasMC.pdf on November 23, 2022.
City of San Dimas, 2017. 24-Hour Average Daily Traffic Counts, 2017. Accessed online at:
https://files.sandimasca.gov/Document_Center/Department/Public%20Works/Traffic% 20Services/Traffic-Counts-24-Hr-2017-Table.pdf, on November 17, 2022.
City of San Dimas, 2022. Housing Element 2021-2029 Update, adopted September 27, 2022. Accessed online at
https://files.sandimasca.gov/Document_Center/Department/Community%20developme nt/Planning%20division/Housing%20Element/San%20Dimas%20HEU_HCDFinalAdopte d_2022-LM_LT%20revised.pdf. Accessed on December 30, 2022.
CNDDB (California Natural Diversity Database), 2022a. RareFind 5 (internet) California Department of Fish and Wildlife (5.2.14). Available at
https://map.dfg.ca.gov/rarefind/view/RareFind.aspx. Accessed on January 5, 2022.
CNDDB (California Natural Diversity Database), 2022b. Natural Diversity Database. July 2022. Special Animals List. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Sacramento, CA. Available at. Last accessed on July 28, 2022.
CNPS (California Native Plant Society), 2022a. Rare Plant Program. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (online edition, v8-03 0.39). Available at http://www.rareplants.cnps.org. Accessed on January 5, 2022.
CNPS. 2022b. A Manual of California Vegetation, Online Edition. California Native Plant Society, CA. 1300 pp. Retrieved from: http://www.cnps.org/cnps/vegetation/. Accessed on January 4, 2022.
Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2022. All About Birds. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
Available at https://www.allaboutbirds.org. Accessed on June 20, 2022 CPCU (California Public Utilities Commission), 2022. Standard Practices. Accessed at https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and-topics/water/standard-practices, on November 23, 2022.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 5.0 – REFERENCES
CTG Energetics, Inc. 2010. City of San Dimas Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Technical Supporting Data. Prepared for City of San Dimas, January 1. Available at https://files.sandimasca.gov/Document_Center/Department/Community%20developme nt/Projects%20&%20Programs/Energy%20Programs/San-Dimas-City-wideGreenhouse-Gas-Inventory.pdf. Accessed on November 18, 2022.
Dibblee, T.W., and Minch, J.A. 2002. Geologic map of the San Dimas and Ontario quadrangles, Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, California. Accessed online via the US Geological Survey National Geologic Map Database at:
https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_71723.htm, on March 15, 2022. eBird. 2022. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. All About Birds. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
Available at https://www.allaboutbirds.org. Accessed on January 11, 2022.
Edison International. 2021. 2021 Sustainability Report. Accessed online at:
https://www.edison.com/content/dam/eix/documents/sustainability/eix-2021- sustainability-report.pdf, on November 23, 2022.
eFlora. 2022. Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Available at http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/. Accessed on January 12, 2022
El Sobrante, 2020. El Sobrante Landfill Annual Monitoring Report. Accessed online at https://www.rcwaste.org/Portals/0/Files/ElSobrante/2021/Final%202020%20Annual %20Report-%20El%20Sobrante%20Landfill.pdf, on November 23, 2022.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 2021. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. Accessed online at: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=la%20mirada%2C%20CA, on November 23, 2022.
FRAP (Federal and Resource Assessment Program), 2021. Priority Landscapes, Accessed online at https://www.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=f767d3f842fd47f4b35d855 7f10387a7, accessed on April 6, 2022.
FTA (Federal Transit Administration), 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual., Office of Planning and Environment, Washington, DC, FTA Report No. 0123.
September. Internet: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/researchinnovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-reportno-0123_0.pdf.
Google Earth V. 7.3.3.7786 (1985-2020). City of San Dimas, Los Angeles County, California.
34.°07’05.34” N 117°48’43.49”. Eye altitude 4,247 feet. Google, 2022. Accessed at https://www.google.com/earth, on November 23, 2022.
Google Earth V 7.3.3.7721. 2021. San Dimas, Los Angeles County, California, U.S.A. 34 07’05.34”, 117°48.43.49”, eye alt 4,052 feet. Available at https://www.google.com/earth/. Accessed on January 4, 2022.
Grubbs, Shannon E., and Paul R. Krausman. 2009. Use of urban landscape by coyotes. The Southwestern Naturalist 54(1):1-12. March 2009.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 5.0 – REFERENCES
Holland, R.F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.
State of California, The Resources Agency, Nongame Heritage Program, California Department of Fish & Game, Sacramento, Calif. 156 pp.
Holland, V. L. and David J. Keil. 1995. California Vegetation. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Dubuque, Iowa.
Howell, D. J. 1980. Adaptive variation in diets of desert bats has implications for evolution of feeding strategies. J. Mammal. 61:730-733.
Jameson E.W. Jr and Peeters H.J. 1988. California Mammals. Berkley (CA): University of California Press
Jepson Flora Project (eds.), 2021. Jepson eFlora, Available at http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/.
Accessed on December 6, 2021.
LA Almanac, 2022. City of San Dimas. Accessed online at https://www.laalmanac.com/cities/ci69.php, on November 23, 2022.
LACSD (Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department), 2022. Accessed online at https://lasd.org/sheriffdiscusses-underfunding-understaffing, on November 23, 2022.
LACFD (Los Angeles County Fire Department), 2022. Accessed online at https://locator.lacounty.gov/lac/Location/3069625/los-angeles-county-fire-department- --station-64-battalion-2-headquarters, on November 23, 2022.
Meyer, S.E., Callaham, M.A., Stewart, J.E., Warren, S.D. 2021. Invasive Species Response to Natural and Anthropogenic Disturbance. In: Poland, T.M., Patel-Weynand, T., Finch, D.M., Miniat, C.F., Hayes, D.C., Lopez, V.M. (eds) Invasive Species in Forests and Rangelands of the United States. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45367-1_5 NatureServe. 2022. Bromus diandrus ruderal grassland. Available at:
https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.788777/Bromus_diandrus _-_Avena_spp_Ruderal_Grassland.
NCES (National Center for Educational Statistics), 2022. Bonita Unified School District. Accessed online at
https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/district_detail.asp?Search=2&details=1&ID2=060 5610&DistrictID=0605610, on November 23, 2022.
Ng, Sandra J., Jim W. Dole, Raymond M. Sauvajot, Seth P.D. Riley, and Thomas J. Valone. 2003. Use of highway undercrossing by wildlife in southern California. Biological Conservation 115 (2004) 499–507.
Núñez, M., Liu, R. and Murray, A. 2022. Transportation Assessment Memorandum for the Allen/Cataract Warehouse. Prepared by Fehr & Peers for UltraSystems Environmental Inc., September 12.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 5.0 – REFERENCES
OPR (Office of Planning and Research). 2018. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. Accessed online at https://opr.ca.gov/docs/20190122- 743_Technical_Advisory.pdf, on July 7, 2022.
Riverside County, 2021. Riverside County Department of Waste Resources El Sobrante Landfill, accessed on November 23, 2022.
RWQCB (Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board), 2014. Water Quality Control Plan for the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. Accessed online at https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/losangeles/water_issues/programs/basin_plan/basin_ plan_documentation.html, accessed on November 23, 2022.
Sawyer et al., J.O., T. Keeler-Wolf, J.M. Evens. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition.
California Native Plant Society Press. Sacramento, CA. 1300 pp.
SCAQMD, 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA. Accessed on August 25, 2022.
SCAQMD, 2006. Final Methodology to Calculate Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 and PM 2.5 Significance Thresholds. South Coast Air Quality Management District. October 2006. Accessed online at http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/pm2-5-significance-thresholds-and-calculation-methodology, accessed on August 25, 2022.
SCAQMD, 2022. Site Survey Site Report for Glendora (Laurel Avenue). Updated May 19, 2022.
Accessed at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-qualitymonitoring-network-plan/aaqmnp-glendora.pdf?sfvrsn=16, on August 25, 2022.
SCEDC (Southern California Earthquake Data Center), 2021. Significant Earthquakes and Faults:
Whittier Narrows Earthquake. Accessed online at
https://scedc.caltech.edu/significant/whittier1987.html, on November 23, 2022.
Seaboard, 2022. Seaboard Engineering Company Low Impact Development Plan. Dated on May 18, 2022.
Senate Bill 100 Joint Agency Report. 2021. Accessed online at https://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/2021/2021-sb-100-joint-agency-reportachieving-100-percent-clean-electricity, on November 23, 2022.
Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
Sibley, David. A. 2000. The Sibley Guide to Birds. Alfred K Knopf. New York, New York. 544 pp.
Soil Survey Staff, 2022. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Web Soil Survey: Custom Soil Resource Report, California. Available at https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Downloaded on January 4, 2022. 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 5.0 – REFERENCES
SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board), 2017. Final 2014/2016 California Integrated Report (Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List / 305(b) Report). Accessed online at https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/water_quality_assessment/#i mpaired, on November 23, 2022.
USEPA, 2022a. 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Nonattainment Area State/Area/County Report: Green Book.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Current Data as of June 30, 2022. [https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/jncs.html#CA]. Accessed August 4, 2022.
USEPA, 2022b. PM-10 (1987) Maintenance Area (Redesignated from Nonattainment) State/Area/County Report: Green Book. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Current [https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/pmcs.html#CA]. Data as of June 30, 2022.
Accessed on August 4, 2022.
USEPA, 2022c. PM-2.5 (2012) Designated Area State/Area/County Report: Green Book. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Current Data as of June 30, 2022. [https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/kbcs.html#CA]. Accessed on August 4, 2022.
USEPA, 2022d. Carbon Monoxide (1971) Maintenance Area (Redesignated from Nonattainment) State/Area/County Report: Green Book. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Current [https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/cmcs.html#CA]. Data as of June 30, 2022.
Accessed on 19 July 2020.
USEPA, 2022e. Nitrogen Dioxide (1971) Maintenance Area (Redesignated from Nonattainment) State/Area/County Report.: Green Book. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Current [https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/nmcs.html]. Data as of June 30, 2022.
Accessed on August 4, 2022.
USEPA, 2022f. Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Pollution Accessed online at https://www.epa.gov/no2- pollution/basic-information-about-no2. Accessed on August 12, 2022.
USEPA, 2022g. Basic Information about Carbon Monoxide (CO) Outdoor Air Pollution. Accessed online at https://www.epa.gov/co-pollution/basic-information-about-carbon-monoxideco-outdoor-air-pollution. Accessed on August 12, 2022.
USEPA, 2022h. Particulate Matter (PM) Basics. Accessed online at https://www.epa.gov/pmpollution/particulate-matter-pm-basics. Accessed on August 12, 2022.
USEPA, 2022i. What is Ozone? Accessed online at https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution-and-yourpatients-health/what-ozone. Accessed on August 12, 2022.
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2022. WATERS GeoViewer. Available at https://www.epa.gov/waterdata/waters-geoviewer. Accessed on January 29, 2022.
USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2021a. Information for Planning, and Consultation (IPaC), IPaC Resource List. January 5, 2022. Retrieved from http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ Accessed on January 5, 2022.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 5.0 – REFERENCES
USFWS. 2022b. Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office. Official Species List: Consultation Code: 083CAR00- 2022-SLI-0369. Carlsbad, California. Retrieved from http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Accessed on January 22, 2022.
USFWS. 2022c.. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) website, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/.
Accessed on January 29, 2022.
USFWS . 2021d. Critical Habitat Portal. Available at http://ecos.fws.gov/crithab/. Accessed on December 21, 2021.
USFWS. 2022e. USFWS ECOS: Environmental Conservation Online System Species Reports. Available at https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species-reports. Accessed on January 29, 2022.
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey), 2018. San Dimas, California 7.5-Minute Series Quadrangle [map].
Prepared for The National Map. Scale 1:24,000. Available at https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/. Downloaded on December 15, 2021.
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2021a. National Hydrography Dataset (ver. USGS National Hydrography Dataset Best Resolution (NHD) for Hydrologic Unit (HU) 8. Available at https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/ngp/national-hydrography/access-nationalhydrography-products.
USGS, 2022. Areas of Land Subsidence in California. Accessed online at https://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidence-areas.html, on March 15, 2022.
WBWG (Western Bat Working Group). 2005. WBWG News: Volume 1, Issue 1. Accessed at http://wbwg.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/December-2005.pdf, on January 14, 2022.
WM (Waste Management Solutions), 2022. Accessed online at https://www.wm.com/us/en/location/ca/san-dimas/trash-pickup-san-dimas-ca, on November 23, 2022.
WRCC, 2022a. Meteorological station location information from National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, San Dimas Fire FC 95 California meteorological station (#047749). Accessed online at https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca7749, on August 16, 2022.
WRCC, 2022b. Meteorological station location information from National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Pomona Fairplex, California meteorological station (#047050). Accessed online at https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca7050, on August 16, 2022
Zeiner, D.C., W.F. Laudenslayer, Jr., K.E. Mayer, and M. White, eds. 1988-1990. California's Wildlife.
Vol. I-III. California Depart of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 6.0 – LIST OF PREPARERS
6.0 6.1
LIST OF PREPARERS
Lead Agency (CEQA)
Anne Nguyen, Associate Planner
City of San Dimas
245 East Bonita Avenue
San Dimas, CA 91773
909.394.6255
[email protected]
6.2 Project Applicant
Ignacio Crespo
7901 Crossway Drive
Pico Rivera, CA 90660
6.3 UltraSystems Environmental, Inc.
6.3.1 Environmental Planning Team
Betsy Lindsay, M.A., MURP, ENV SP, Project Director
Robert Reicher, MBA, Senior Project Manager
Hina Gupta, MURP, LEED AP, Senior Project Manager
6.3.2 Technical Team
Michael Milroy, M.S., Project Manager
Billye Breckenridge, B.A., Deputy Project Manager
Victor Paitimusa, B.A., Assistant Project Manager
Steve Borjeson, B.A., Senior Planner
Michelle Tollett, B.A., Senior Biologist
Allison Carver, B.S./B.A., Senior Biologist
Matthew Sutton, Staff Biologist
Michael Rogozen, D. Env, Senior Principal Engineer
Isha Shah, M.S., Staff Engineer
Amir Ayati, B.S., Staff Scientist
Swarna Kumaresan, M.S., Environmental Engineer
Stephen O’Neil, M.A., RPA, Cultural Resources Manager
Megan Black Doukakis, M.A., Archaeological Technician
Gulben Kaplan, GIS Analyst
Andrew Soto, B.A., Word Processing/Technical Editing
David Luhrsen, B.S., Word Processing/Administrative Assistant
6.3.3 Other Firms
Fehr & Peers – Traffic Impact Analysis
Ryan Liu, EIT, Senior Transportation Engineer
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
7.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared in conformance with § 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and § 15097 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which requires all state and local agencies to establish monitoring or reporting programs whenever approval of a project relies upon a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The MMRP ensures the implementation of the measures being imposed to mitigate or avoid the significant adverse environmental impacts identified through the use of monitoring and reporting. Monitoring is generally an ongoing or periodic process of project oversight; reporting generally consists of a written compliance review that is presented to the decision-making body or authorized staff person.
It is the intent of the MMRP to (1) provide a framework for document implementation of the required mitigation; (2) identify monitoring/reporting responsibility; (3) provide a record of the monitoring/reporting, and (4) ensure compliance with those mitigation measures that are within the responsibility of the lead agency and/or project applicant to implement.
The following subjects require mitigation:
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology and Soils
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Noise
Tribal Cultural Resources
Mandatory Findings of Significance
The following subjects do not require mitigation:
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Energy
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hydrology and Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Population and Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation
Utilities and Services
Wildfire
Table 7.0-1 lists impacts, mitigation measures, and project improvement measures adopted by the City of San Dimas in connection with the approval of the proposed project, the level of significance after mitigation, responsible and monitoring parties, and the project phase in which the measures are to be implemented. Only those environmental topics for which mitigation is required are listed in this Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM Table 7.0-1
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
AGENCY
MONITORING 2. MONITORING
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
4.4 Biological Resources
MM BIO-1: Pre-Construction Breeding Bird Survey
If construction is anticipated to commence during the
nesting season (between January 1 and August 31 of any
given year, or as determined by a local CDFW office), a qualified avian biologist shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey no earlier than one week prior to
construction.
Threshold 4.4a) Would
the project have a
substantial adverse
effect, either directly or
through habitat
modifications, on any
species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in
local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations,
or by the California
Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
To be in compliance with the MBTA and Fish and Game
Code, and to avoid impacts or take of migratory non-game breeding birds, their nests, young, and eggs, the following measures will be implemented. The measures below will
help to reduce direct and indirect impacts caused by
construction on migratory non-game breeding birds to less than significant levels.
1. City of San
Dimas
2. City of San
Dimas Project
Applicant
Field
Verification
3. Prior to the Start
of Project
Construction
• Project activities that will remove or disturb potential nest sites, such as open ground, trees, shrubs, grasses, and burrows, during the breeding season would be a
potentially significant impact if migratory non-game
breeding birds are present. Project activities that will remove or disturb potential nest sites will be scheduled outside the breeding bird season to avoid potential
direct impacts on migratory non-game breeding birds
protected by the MBTA and Fish and Game Code. The
breeding bird nesting season is typically from February 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
15 through September 15 but can vary slightly from
year to year, usually depending on weather conditions.
Removing all physical features that could potentially
serve as nest sites will also help to prevent birds from nesting within the project site during the breeding
season and during construction activities.
• If project activities cannot be avoided from February 15 through September 15, a qualified biologist will conduct a pre-construction breeding bird survey for breeding
birds and active nests or potential nesting sites within the limits of project disturbance. The survey will be
conducted at least seven days prior to the onset of
scheduled activities, such as mobilization and staging. It will end no more than three days prior to vegetation,
substrate, and structure removal and/or disturbance.
•
•
If no breeding birds or active nests are observed during the pre-construction survey or they are observed and
will not be impacted, project activities may begin and no further mitigation will be required.
If a breeding bird territory or an active bird nest is
located during the pre-construction survey and will
potentially be impacted, the site will be mapped on
engineering drawings, and a no-activity buffer zone will be marked (fencing, stakes, flagging, orange snow
fencing, etc.) a minimum of 100 feet in all directions or 500 feet in all directions for listed bird species and all raptors. The biologist will determine the appropriate
buffer size based on the type of activities planned near the nest and the type of bird that created the nest. Some 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
bird species are more tolerant than others of noise and activities occurring near their nest. The buffer zone will not be disturbed by construction or other activity until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest is
inactive, the young have fledged, the young are no
longer being fed by the parents, the young have left the area, or the young will no longer be impacted by project activities. Periodic monitoring by a biologist will be
performed to determine when nesting is complete. Once
the nesting cycle has finished, project activities may
begin within the buffer zone.
• If listed bird species are observed within the project site during the pre-construction survey, the biologist will
immediately map the area and notify the appropriate
resource agency to determine suitable protection
measures and/or mitigation measures and to
determine if additional surveys or focused protocol
surveys are necessary. Project activities may begin
within the area only when concurrence is received from
the appropriate resource agency.
• Birds or their active nests will not be disturbed,
captured, handled, or moved. Active nests cannot be
removed or disturbed; however, nests can be removed
or disturbed if determined inactive by a qualified
biologist.
Threshold 4.4e) 1. City of San Dimas
2. City of San Dimas
3. During
MM BIO-2:
Measure
Mature Significant Tree Replacement Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological
Project
Applicant
Field
Verification
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or
ordinance?
There are 19 trees on the project site that are designated as mature significant trees as per the City’s tree preservation ordinance (City of San Dimas, 2006), 17 of which are
proposed for removal. The following species and number
per species of mature significant trees are proposed for removal: one bishop pine, eleven pepper trees, three white ash, one Mexican fan palm, and one carrotwood.
Construction and
two-years post
Project
Construction
Section 18.162.060 Conditions Imposed of the tree
preservation ordinance state that mature significant trees must be replaced using a two-to-one ratio with trees that are 15-gallon box trees, or other replacement of equivalent value and size, or as the City deems appropriate. It further states that the replacement trees will be planted within the project site unless the City approves offsite planting. Thus, to replace the 17 mature significant trees that will be removed during the construction of the project, the project proponent will plant 34 fifteen-gallon box trees on the project site. All replacement trees need to be maintained by the project proponent for two years and all other
monitoring and maintenance requirements of this section of the tree preservation ordinance must be followed.
Furthermore, granting of the tree removal permit is
contingent upon meeting the conditions of Section 18.162. 070 Required Findings, of the tree preservation ordinance.
4.5 Cultural Resources
Threshold 4.5a)
Would the
project cause a
substantial adverse
MM CUL-1: Prior to the commencement of grading or
excavation, workers conducting construction activities and their foremen will receive Worker Environmental
Awareness Program (WEAP) training from a qualified
1. City of San
Dimas Project
Applicant
Field
Verification
2. City of San
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
change in the
significance of a
historical resource
pursuant to § 15064.5?
archaeologist regarding the potential for sensitive
archaeological and paleontological resources to be
unearthed during grading activities. The workers will be directed to report any unusual specimens of bone, stone, ceramics, or other archaeological artifacts or features observed during grading and/or other construction
activities to their foremen and to cease grading activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery until a qualified archaeologist or Native American cultural monitor is
notified of the discovery by the Superintendent of the
project site and can assess their significance. The WEAP shall be implemented to educate all construction personnel on the area’s environmental conditions and the
environmental protection measures that must be adhered to by all workers throughout the duration of project
construction.
Dimas
3. Prior to Project
Construction
Training materials shall be language-appropriate for all construction personnel. Upon completion of the WEAP,
workers shall sign a form stating that they attend the
program, understand all protection measures, and shall
abide by all the rules of the WEAP. A record of all trained personnel shall be kept with the construction foreman at the project field construction office and shall be made available to any resource agency personnel. If new construction
personnel is added to the project later, the construction foreman shall ensure that new personnel receives training before they start working. The archaeologist shall provide hard copies of the WEAP presentation to the construction foreman.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
MM CUL-2: If historical or unique archaeological resources are discovered during construction, the contractor shall halt construction activities in the immediate area and notify the City. An on-call qualified archaeologist shall be notified and afforded the necessary time to recover, analyze, and curate the find(s). The qualified archaeologist shall recommend the extent of archaeological monitoring necessary to ensure the protection of any other resources that may be in the area and afford the necessary time and funds to recover, analyze, and curate the find(s). Construction activities may continue on other parts of the site while the evaluation and treatment of historical or unique archaeological resources take place.
1. City of San
Dimas
2. City of San
Dimas
Project
Applicant
Field
Verification
3. During Project
Construction
Threshold 4.5b) Would
the project cause a
substantial adverse
change in the
significance of an
archaeological resource
pursuant to § 15064.5?
Refer to
mitigation
measures CUL1 and CUL-2
above.
Refer to
mitigation
measures CUL- measures CUL-1 and
1 and CUL-2
Refer to mitigation
Refer to mitigation measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 above.
CUL-2 above.
above.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
MM CUL-3: If human remains are encountered during
excavations associated with this project, all work shall stop within a 30-foot radius of the discovery, and the San
Bernardino County Coroner will be notified (§ 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). The Coroner will determine
whether the remains are of recent human origin or older Native American ancestry. If the coroner, with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistoric, they will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC will be responsible for
designating the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD
(either an individual or sometimes a committee) will be responsible for the ultimate disposition of the remains, as required by § 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The MLD will make recommendations within 24 hours of their notification by the NAHC. These recommendations may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native
American burials (§ 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code).
1. City of San
Threshold 4.5c) Would Dimas
the project disturb any
human remains,
including those interred
outside of formal
2. City of San
Dimas
Project
Applicant
Field
Verification
3. During Project
Construction cemeteries?
4.7 Geology and Soils
MM GEO-1: The project applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist, prior to the issuance of building/grading permit, to remain on-call during project ground-disturbing activities. If paleontological resources are uncovered during project construction, the contractor shall halt construction activities within 50 feet of the find and notify the City. The on-call paleontologist shall be notified and afforded the necessary time and funds to recover, analyze, and curate the find(s). The paleontologist shall curate the find(s) at an accredited repository for paleontological resources such as
1. City of San
Dimas
Threshold 4.7f) Project
could directly or
indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological
resource or site or
2. City of San
Dimas Project
Applicant
Field
Verification 3. Prior to the
issuance of
unique geologic feature. building permits
and during
Project
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
the Western Science Center near Hemet or the San
Bernardino County Museum. Subsequently, the monitor
shall remain onsite for the duration of the ground
disturbance to ensure the protection of any other resources that are found during construction on the project site.
Construction
4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
MM HAZ-1: In the event that the future tenant will handle 1. Los Angeles County Fire
Department –
Health
hazardous materials above the reportable quantity
threshold, the lease agreement with the future tenant shall require the tenant to submit a Hazardous Materials Business Plan which would include an inventory of all hazardous
materials used, stored, or otherwise managed onsite to the Los Angeles County Fire Department – Health Hazardous
Materials Division. The recommendations of the Hazardous Materials Business Plan would be included in the lease
agreement (signed by the tenant) as mandatory measures
required to be implemented by the tenant.
Review and
Approval of
Hazardous
Materials
Hazardous
Materials
Future Tenant Division
2. City of San
Dimas
Business Plan Threshold 4.9a) Would
the project create a
significant hazard to the
public or the
3. PostConstruction
environment through the
routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous
materials?
MM HAZ-2: In the event that the future tenant will handle hazardous materials above the reportable quantity
threshold, the lease agreement with the future tenant shall require the tenant, in coordination with the City of San Dimas, to identify routes along which hazardous materials may routinely be transported. If essential facilities such as schools, hospitals, child care centers, or other facilities with special evacuation needs are located along these routes, the future tenant shall develop an emergency response plan
that can be implemented in the event of an unauthorized release of hazardous materials. The recommendations of
the Emergency Response Plan would be included in the
1. Los Angeles
County Fire
Department –
Health Review and
Approval of
Emergency
Hazardous
Materials
Division
Future Tenant
Response Plan
2. City of San
Dimas
3. Post7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
lease agreement (signed by the future tenant) as mandatory measures required to be implemented by the future tenant.
Construction
Threshold 4.9b): Would
the project create a
significant hazard to the
public or the
environment through
reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident
conditions involving the
release of hazardous
materials into the
Refer to
mitigation
Refer to
mitigation Refer to mitigation
measures HAZ- measures HAZ- measures HAZ-1 and
1 and HAZ-2
above.
Refer to mitigation measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 above. 1 and HAZ-2 above.
HAZ-2 above.
environment?
4.13 Noise
MM N-1: The construction contractor will use the
following source controls when working within 600
feet of occupied residential buildings:
Threshold 4.13a):
Would the project result
in generation of a
substantial temporary or
permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in
the vicinity of the project
in excess of standards
established in the local
general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable
standards of other
Use of noise-producing equipment will be limited to the interval from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no construction on Sundays.
1. City of San Dimas
2. City of San Dimas
Project
Applicant and
Construction
Field
Verification 3. During Project
Construction For all noise-producing equipment, use types and Contractor models that have the lowest horsepower and the lowest
noise generating potential practical for their intended use.
agencies? The construction contractor will ensure that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, is properly
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
operating (tuned-up) and lubricated, and that mufflers
are working adequately.
Have only necessary equipment onsite.
Use manually-adjustable or ambient-sensitive backup
alarms.
MM N-2: When working near adjacent residential uses, the construction contractor will also use the following path controls, except where not physically feasible, when
needed:
Install portable noise barriers, including solid
structures and noise blankets, between the active noise sources and the nearest noise receivers.
1. City of San Dimas
2. City of San Dimas
Project
Applicant and
Construction
Field
Verification 3. During Project
Construction
Temporarily enclose localized and stationary noise Contractor sources.
Store and maintain equipment, building materials, and
waste materials as far as practical from as many
sensitive receivers as practical.
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Threshold 4.18a):
Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of a tribal
cultural resource,
defined in Public
Resources Code section
21074 as either a site,
Field 1. Native American
Tribes and the
City of San
MM TCR-1: Retain a Native American Monitor Prior to
Verification,
Review, and
Approval of
Cultural
Resources
Management
Plan
Commencement of Ground-Disturbing Activities
A. The project applicant/lead agency shall retain a Native American Monitor from or approved by the Gabrieleño
Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. The monitor
shall be retained prior to the commencement of any
“ground-disturbing activity” for the subject project at Project
Applicant
Dimas
2. City of San
Dimas
3. During
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
feature, place, cultural
landscape that is
all project locations (i.e., both on-site and any off-site locations that are included in the project
description/definition and/or required in connection
with the project, such as public improvement work).
“Ground-disturbing activity” shall include, but is not
limited to, demolition, pavement removal, potholing,
auguring, grubbing, tree removal, boring, grading,
excavation, drilling, and trenching into native soil and undocumented soils. The monitor(s) will continue
their duties until it is determined through consultation with the permittee, City Planning, that monitoring is
no longer warranted.
Construction
geographically defined in
terms of the size and
scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object
with cultural value to a
California Native
American tribe, and that
is:
(ii) A resource
determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion
and supported by
substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant
to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in
B. A copy of the executed monitoring agreement shall be submitted to the lead agency prior to the earlier
commencement of any ground-disturbing activity, or
the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a
ground-disturbing activity.
C. The monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the relevant grounddisturbing activities, the type of construction activities performed, locations of ground-disturbing activities,
soil types, cultural-related materials, and any other
facts, conditions, materials, or discoveries of
significance to the Tribe. Monitor logs will identify and describe any discovered TCRs, including but not
limited to, Native American cultural and historical
artifacts, remains, places of significance, etc.,
(collectively, tribal cultural resources, or “TCR”), as well as any discovered Native American (ancestral)
human remains and burial goods. Copies of monitor
subdivision (c) of Public
Resource Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency
shall consider the
significance of the
resource to a California
Native American tribe.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
logs will be provided to the project applicant/lead
agency upon written request to the Tribe.
D. On-site tribal monitoring shall conclude upon the
latter of the following (1) written confirmation to the Kizh from a designated point of contact for the project applicant/lead agency that all ground-disturbing
activities and phases that may involve grounddisturbing activities on the project site or in connection with the project are complete; or (2) a
determination and written notification by the Kizh to
the project applicant/lead agency that no future,
planned construction activity and/or
development/construction phase at the project site
possesses the potential to impact Kizh TCRs.
E. Upon discovery of any TCRs, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease
(i.e., not less than the surrounding 50 feet) and the City notified. Construction activities may continue in other areas outside of the designated protection zone, which
shall be delineated with cones, flagging, or fencing.
The designated Kizh monitor and/or Kizh
archaeologist shall evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether the resource uncovered is a
TCR. If its determined that the potential resource is a TCR (as defined by PRC, Section 21074), tribes
consulting under AB 52 would be provided a
reasonable period of time, typically 5 days from the
date of a new discovery is made, to conduct a site visit and make recommendations regarding future ground
disturbance activities as well as the treatment of any
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
discovered TCRs. The designated tribe
monitor/archaeologist shall implement a plan for the
treatment and disposition of any discovered TCRs
based on the nature of the resource and considering
the recommendations of the tribe(s). Implementation
of proposed recommendations will be made based on
the determination of the City that the approach is
reasonable and feasible. The Kizh will recover and
retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner
the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe’s sole
discretion, and for any purpose, the Tribe deems
appropriate, including for educational, cultural,
and/or historic purposes.
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
MM TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Human
Remains and Associated Funerary Objects
A. Native American human remains are defined in PRC
5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation and
in any state of decomposition or skeletal
completeness. Funerary objects, called associated
grave goods in Public Resources Code Section
5097.98, are also to be treated according to this
statute.
B. If Native American human remains and/or grave
goods are discovered or recognized on the project
site, then all construction activities shall
immediately cease. Health and Safety Code Section
7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human
skeletal material shall be immediately reported to
the County Coroner and all ground-disturbing
activities shall immediately halt and shall remain
halted until the coroner has determined the nature
of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human
remains to be those of a Native American or has
reason to believe they are Native American, he or
she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the
Native American Heritage Commission, and Public
Resources Code Section 5097.98 shall be followed.
1. Native American
Tribes and the
City of San
Field
Verification,
Review, and
Approval of
Cultural
Resources
Management
Plan
Dimas
Project
Applicant 2. City of San
Dimas
3. During
Construction
C. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be
treated alike per California Public Resources Code
section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2).
D. Construction activities may resume in other parts
of the project site at a minimum of 200 feet away
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
from discovered human remains and/or burial
goods, if the Kizh determines in its sole discretion
that resuming construction activities at that
distance is acceptable and provides the project
manager express consent of that determination
(along with any other mitigation measures the Kizh
monitor and/or archaeologist deems necessary).
(CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f).)
E. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the
preferred manner of treatment for discovered
human remains and/or burial goods. Any historic
archaeological material that is not Native American
in origin (non-TCR) shall be curated at a public,
non-profit institution with a research interest in the
materials, such as the Natural History Museum of
Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum if such
an institution agrees to accept the material. If no
institution accepts the archaeological material, it
shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes.
F. Any discovery of human remains/burial goods shall
be kept confidential to prevent further disturbance.
Field 1. Native American
Tribes and the
City of San
MM TCR -3:
Remains:
Procedures for Burials and Funerary
Verification,
Review, and
Approval of
Cultural
Resources
Management
Project
Applicant
A. As the Most Likely Descendant (“MLD”), the Koo-nasgna Burial Policy shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human
bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal
Dimas
2. City of San
Dimas
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
Traditions included, but were not limited to, the
preparation of the soil for burial, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning
of human remains.
Plan 3. During
Construction
B. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the discovery location shall be treated as a
cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be
created.
C. The prepared soil and cremation soils are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain
intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are
reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later;
other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to
contain human remains can also be considered as
associated funerary objects. Cremations will either be
removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure
complete recovery of all sacred materials.
D. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the
remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel
plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed
over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If
this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe
will make every effort to recommend diverting the
project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If 7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined
that burials will be removed.
E. In the event preservation in place is not possible despite good faith efforts by the project applicant/developer
and/or landowner, before ground-disturbing activities
may resume on the project site, the landowner shall
arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Construction
activities may continue in other areas outside of the
designated protection zone, which shall be delineated
with cones, flagging, or fencing.
F. Each occurrence of human remains and associated
funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags.
All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects,
and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a
secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery.
The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity.
There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural
materials recovered.
G. The Tribe will work closely with the project’s qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated
carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be
prepared and shall include (at a minimum) detailed
descriptive notes and sketches. All data recovery data
recovery-related forms of documentation shall be
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
approved in advance by the Tribe. If any data recovery
is performed, once complete, a final report shall be
submitted to the applicant, the City, the South Central Coastal Information Center, the Tribe and the NAHC.
The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or destructive
diagnostics on human remains.
1. Native American
Tribes and the
City of San
MM TCR-4: Prior to the commencement of any grounddisturbing activity at the project site, the project applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor from a local
culturally-affiliated Gabrielino (Tongva) tribe. A copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of San Dimas Planning Division prior to the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity.
Field
Verification,
Review, and
Approval of
Cultural
Resources
Management
Plan
Dimas
Project
Applicant 2. City of San
Dimas
3. During
Construction
MM TCR-5: The Tribal monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve grounddisturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Tribe as activities that may include but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation,
drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will
provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project Site are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground-disturbing
1. Native American
Tribes and the
City of San
Field
Verification,
Review, and
Approval of
Cultural
Resources
Management
Plan
Dimas
Project
Applicant 2. City of San
Dimas
3. During
Construction
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
activities at the Project Site have little to no potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources.
MM TCR-6: Upon discovery of a Tribal Cultural Resource, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 60 feet) until the find can be assessed. All Tribal Cultural Resources
unearthed by project activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor as described in MM TCR-4. If the resources are Native American in origin, the monitoring Tribe may retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, for educational,
cultural, and/or historic purposes.
1. Native American
Tribes and the
City of San
Field
Verification,
Review, and
Approval of
Cultural
Resources
Management
Plan
Dimas
Project
Applicant 2. City of San
Dimas
3. During
Construction
MM TCR-7: If human remains are encountered during
excavations associated with this project, all work shall stop within a 60-foot radius of the discovery, and the Los Angeles County Coroner will be notified (§ 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of recent human origin or older Native
American ancestry. If the coroner, with the aid of the
supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistoric, they will contact the NAHC. The NAHC will be responsible for designating the Most Likely Descendant
(MLD). The MLDS (either an individual or sometimes a
committee) will be responsible for the ultimate disposition of the remains, as required by § 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The MLD will make
recommendations within 24 hours of their notification by the NAHC. These recommendations may include scientific
removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and
1. Native American
Tribes and the
City of San
Field
Verification,
Review, and
Approval of
Cultural
Resources
Management
Plan
Dimas
Project
Applicant 2. City of San
Dimas
3. During
Construction
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
SECTION 7.0 - MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
1. ENFORCEMENT
RESPONSIBLE
/
MONITORING
PARTY
AGENCY
TOPICAL AREA
IMPACT
MONITORING 2. MONITORING MITIGATION MEASURE ACTION AGENCY
3. MONITORING
PHASE
items associated with Native American burials (§ 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code).
7091/ Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
(IS/MND)
Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project
Development Plan Review Board Case No. 21-0002
Zone Change Case No. 21-0001
Tree Removal Program Case No. 21-0004
Lot Merger Case No. 21-0001
Prepared for:
CITY OF SAN DIMAS
City of San Dimas Planning Division
245 E. Bonita Avenue
San Dimas, CA 91773
Telephone: (909) 394-6256
Prepared by:
UltraSystems Environmental Inc.
16431 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618-4355
Telephone: (949) 788-4900
FAX: (949) 788-4901
April 2023
Project No. 7091
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 2.0
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 1-1 LIST OF COMMENTS/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ..................................................................... 2-1
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment
Attachment A
Attachment B
Public Comments
Shelley Rouse
Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation
7091/Allen Cataract Warehouse IS/MND
Responses to Comments
Page i Page 1255 – 1497 April 2023
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Responses to Comments (RTC) document, in conjunction with the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) responds to comments on the proposed Allen Cataract Warehouse Project (project). While the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines do not require a final initial study or the preparation of formal responses to comments received during the public review period for an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration,1 the City of San Dimas (City) is making available responses to the comments it received during the public review process, to provide further disclosure about the proposed project.
This document provides responses to comments received on the IS/MND. A total of two comment letters (e-mail) were received and are summarized in Section 2.0, Public Comment Letters. The letters are included as Attachments A and B of this document. 1 CEQA only requires the lead agency to respond to comments that are received in response to an environmental impact report (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, § 15088, Evaluation of and Response to Comments). 7091/Allen Cataract Warehouse IS/MND
Responses to Comments
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
2.0 LIST OF COMMENTS/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
This section includes a list of persons, organizations and public agencies that submitted comments on the IS/MND and their respective responses. When comments did not address the completeness or adequacy of the environmental documentation or when they did not raise environmental issues, the receipt of the comment is noted; no further response is provided as CEQA does not require a response in these instances.
The following written comments were received on the IS/MND, during the public review period. The comment letters are provided in Attachments A and B of this document.
Letter
A
Agency, Organization, or Individual
Shelley Rouse
Date
3/13/2023
I’m concerned with this project as it is located across the street from my house at 320 W Allen Ave. It’s already challenging getting in and out of our driveway, Comment A-1: having a commercial driveway with possible congestion issue is not acceptable.
Allen Ave is already busier than it never imagined would happen when moving in almost 30 years ago.
This comment is noted. This comment does not raise any environmental issues Response A-1: addressed under the scope of CEQA analysis.
Comment A-2 According to the environmental report “staff has determined that this project will not have significant effect on the environment.“ Put yourselves in our shoes, would this project in reality truly not have significant effect? Response A-2 CEQA Guidelines Section 15382 sets forth the following definition for significant effect: “Significant effect on the environment” means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change [emphasis added] in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project…” Under this definition, the project will not have a significant effect.
Comment A-3 Another concern is losing the parking in front of our house. My comments are most likely insignificant for this project considering they have already started working to remove the houses across the street. We expect the City of San Dimas will make sure this business and customers do not park on the south side of Allen.
Response A-3 Onsite parking for the project must meet standards in the San Dimas Municipal Code. Public on-street parking restrictions are beyond the scope of CEQA analysis.
B Ryan Nordness/Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation 3/22/2023 The proposed project is located outside of Serrano ancestral territory and, as such, YSMN will not be requesting to receive consulting party status with the lead agency or to participate in the scoping, development, or review of documents created pursuant to legal and regulatory mandates.
Comment B-1:
Response B-1 This comment is noted. This comment does not raise any environmental issues. 7091/Allen Cataract Warehouse IS/MND
Responses to Comments
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
ATTACHMENT A
7091/Allen Cataract Warehouse IS/MND
Responses to Comments
From: Shelley Rouse
To: Anne Nguyen
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
San Dimas Notice of Intent on Allen and Cataract Project Monday, March 13, 2023 2:55:27 PM
San Dimas Notice of Intent.docx
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report phish using Phish Alert Button.
Hello Anne,
Attached is my comments for the pending project across the street from my house.
Kindly send my comments to applicable departments.
Have a wonderful day!
Shelley Rouse
Aten�on: Planning and Development Departments
Re: No�ce of Intent to Adopt a Mi�gated Nega�ve Declara�on I’m concerned with this project as it is located across the street from my house at 320 W Allen Ave.
It’s already challenging ge�ng in and out of our driveway, having a commercial driveway with possible conges�on issue is not acceptable.
Allen Ave is already busier than it never imagined would happen when moving in almost 30 years ago.
According to the environmental report “staff has determined that this project will not have significant effect on the environment. “ Put yourselves in our shoes, would this project in reality truly not have significant effect?
Another concern is losing the parking in front of our house. My comments are most likely insignificant for this project considering they have already started working to remove the houses across the street.
We expect the City of San Dimas will make sure this business and customers do not park on the south side of Allen.
Appreciate your �me on our concerns.
Shelley Rouse
[email protected]
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
ATTACHMENT B
7091/Allen Cataract Warehouse IS/MND
Responses to Comments
From: Ryan Nordness <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2023 11:29 AM
To: Anne Nguyen <[email protected]>
Subject: Tribal Response for the MND for the Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project, Case 21-0002 You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report phish using Phish Alert Button.
Dear Anne,
Thank you for contacting the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (formerly known as the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians) regarding the above-referenced project. YSMN appreciates the opportunity to review the project documentation, which was received by the Cultural Resources Management Department on March 3rd 2023. The proposed project is located outside of Serrano ancestral territory and, as such, YSMN will not be requesting to receive consulting party status with the lead agency or to participate in the scoping, development, or review of documents created pursuant to legal and regulatory mandates.
Kind regards,
Ryan Nordness
Cultural Resource Analyst
Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation
Ryan Nordness
Cultural Resource Analyst
[email protected]
O:(909) 864-8933 Ext 50-2022
M:(909) 838-4053
26569 Community Center Dr Highland, California 92346
MEMO
TO: Luis Torrico, Director of Community Development, City of San Dimas FROM: Michael B. Rogozen, D.Env.
Patricia Haigh, BS, BA
John Fox esq.
DATE: September 19, 2024
PROJECT #:
RE:
7091 Allen Cataract Warehouse IS/MND
Response to SWAPE comments
On May 24, 2024 an organization named Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”) submitted a letter commenting on the Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND).1 Included with the SAFER letter was a memorandum prepared by an entity named Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (“SWAPE”) purporting to provide expert analysis of the IS/MND and identify flaws in the IS/MND. The purpose of this memorandum is to respond to these comments and support the responses with substantial evidence in the form of expert analysis supported with evidence. SWAPE comments (in italics) and our responses thereto are as follows.
I. There is Substantial Evidence that the Project May Have a Significant Air Quality Impact.
a. The MND Relied on Unsubstantiated Input Parameters to Estimate Project Emissions.
1. The City should have assumed, as a worst case, that the proposed warehouse would be refrigerated.
Response:
Neither the Project description in the IS/MND nor the Project plans include any refrigeration or otherwise indicate the potential for cold storage in the Project. SAFER and its consultant SWAPE speculate that 1 Comment on Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Allen-Cataract Warehouse Project (Development Plan Review Bd.: Case 21-0002). May 28, 2024 City Council Hearing – Agenda Item NO. PH4. Letter from Marjan R. Abubo, Lozeau Drury LLP to San Dimas City Council and Marco Espinoza, Acting Planning Manager, City of San Dimas. May 24, 2024.
01171.0005/1016461.1 Corporate Office – Orange CountyTelephone: 949.788.4900 16431 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618-4355
Facsimile: 949.788.4901 Page 1263 – 1497 Website: www.ultrasystems.com Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
because no tenant has been identified for the project, future tenants may require it. CEQA does not require speculation.
Moreover, UltraSystems re-ran the CalEEMod model,2 changing only the “Refrigerated Warehouse No-Rail” land use from the unrefrigerated case and correcting the value for soil imports as described in comment a.3. For the refrigerated case, maximum daily construction emissions would slightly decrease, while maximum daily operational emissions would approximately double over the unrefrigerated case. However, for all criteria pollutants, daily emissions for the refrigerated case would still be far below the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD’s) significance thresholds under CEQA. (See Attachment 1.)
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the refrigerated warehouse case would decrease from 165.7 to 161.7 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e). Following standard industry practice, we amortized the construction emission over 30 years, so that they would be 5.52 MTCO e per year for the unrefrigerated case and 5.39 MTCO e 2 2 per year for the refrigerated case. Annual operating GHG emissions, including the amortized construction emission would increase from 277 to 506 MTCO2e. They would remain far below the significance threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year.
This conservative analysis shows that criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions impacts would remain less than significant even with refrigeration for cold storage.
Electricity use would increase by about 828,000 kilowatt-hours per year but would not be significantly wasteful or put a strain on regional electricity infrastructure. In conclusion, neither SAFER nor SWAPE provide any credible evidence that the Project would result in a significant air quality or energy impact if the land use were changed to refrigerated storage.
2. The City made unsubstantiated changes to individual construction phase lengths.
As discussed in the 2020 CalEEMod User’s Guide,3 the construction tab contains default information obtained from surveys conducted of 2 3
So that results with the different land use could be comparable with the original results, we used Version 2020.4.0 of CalEEMod. That version has been superseded.
California Emissions Estimator Users Guide, Version 2020.4.0. Prepared by BREEZE Software, A Division of Trinity Consultants in collaboration with South Coast Air Quality Management District and the California Air Districts for 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1264 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
construction sites with a range of project types and sizes and provides a default construction equipment list and phase length data based on the total lot acreage of a project. The CalEEMod User’s Guide further states: “If the user has more detailed site-specific equipment and phase information, the user should override the default values.”4 This is what was done in the MND analysis, which used information provided by the Project contractor, who will actually select the specific construction equipment to build the Project and carry out construction.5 The Project contractor is therefore uniquely qualified to provide the construction information; there is no evidence that SWAPE is qualified to determine the construction equipment used for construction of the project or the length of construction phases.
The beginning month of May-June 2023 and ending month of March 2024 were approximations. Due to the nature of construction projects, obtaining exact start dates is not feasible. However, duration of project construction can be more easily predicted. The construction schedule and phase lengths used for modeling purposes were provided by the project applicant and sent to UltraSystems via email from Associate Planner Anne Nguyen.6 (See Attachment 3.) Neither SAFER nor SWAPE has provided any credible evidence that the Project contractor’s information is inaccurate or understates impacts.
3. The City failed to substantiate material export and import values.
The original analysis was conservative, in that there was an imbalance between estimated soil imports and soil exports7 and only the import values were used in the original CalEEMod model runs. The net import of soil is actually 2,678 cubic yards as opposed to 8,491 cubic yards, so emissions from soil imports were originally overestimated. The model was rerun with a net soil import value of 2,679, as provided by the City (See Footnote 6 and Attachment 3).
4. The City failed to substantiate the amount of required demolition.
The exact amount of square footage to be demolished was unknown.
For a worst-case scenario, the project’s full land area, approximately California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021. https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/user-guide-2021/01_user-39-s-guide2020-4-0.pdf?sfvrsn=6.
Ibid., p. 31. 4
5 Letter from James Devling, Manager, Allen Industrial Investors LLC, to Luis Torrico, Director of Community Development, City of San Dimas. September 17, 2024. See Attachment 2. 6 7
Email from Anne Nguyen, City of San Dimas, to Hina Gupta, UltraSystems Environmental Inc., transmitting construction scheduling and equipment information. August 23, 2024. See Attachment 3.
Soil imports were estimated to be 8,491 cubic yards, and soil exports were assumed to be 5,813 cubic yards 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1265 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
112,500 square feet, was used as the input for demolition in the CalEEMod model. In reality, only the structures within the project boundary require demolishing, so, the amount of demolition and emissions associated with it will be lower than presented.
5. The City made unsubstantiated changes to construction off-road equipment input parameters.
Details on equipment to be used during project construction were provided by the project applicant and sent to UltraSystems via email from Associate Planner Anne Nguyen.8
b. There is Substantial Evidence of a Fair Argument that the Project May Have a Significant Air Quality Impact.
SAFER and SWAPE assert that the Project will result in a significant air quality impact based on SWAPE’s flawed emissions modeling using default inputs that are not accurate for the Project. As set forth above, the CalEEMod User’s Guide expressly calls for the use of project-specific data when available instead of the default inputs, which are based on a variety of different project types. That is exactly what the City did in this case. In the cases of both “Refrigerated” and “Unrefrigerated” warehouse land uses, emissions do not exceed thresholds.
The maximum VOC emissions, under the “Refrigerated Warehouse” scenario, are 26.1 pounds per day (lb/day), which remain below the 75 lb/day SCAQMD threshold. SWAPE’s modeling is not credible, and neither SAFER nor SWAPE has provided any other credible evidence of a significant Project air quality impact.
II. There is Substantial Evidence of a Fair Argument that the Project May have a Significant GHG Impact.
SAFER and SWAPE maintain that the MND’s analysis of the Project’s greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts is inadequate. They claim that the GHG analysis is flawed because, they assert, the air quality modeling used incorrect inputs. For the reasons previously stated, the air quality modeling used more accurate, Projectspecific information. Therefore, GHG modeling, which is also based on the same information, is also correct.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a) provides that the City, as lead agency, has the discretion to determine whether to use a quantitative GHG emissions threshold or a qualitative or performance-based one. In the absence of any applicable adopted threshold, the City selected a numeric threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon 8 Email from Anne Nguyen, City of San Dimas, to Hina Gupta, UltraSystems Environmental Inc., transmitting construction scheduling and equipment information. August 23, 2024.
01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1266 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year. This brightline threshold, which was developed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), is widely utilized throughout southern California (e.g., Burbank, Torrance) and use of this threshold was recently upheld by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in the case of Upland Community First v. City of Upland (Case No. E078241). As the Project’s GHG emissions (161.7 MTCO2e per year) are well below this significance threshold, the IS/MND correctly concluded that the project’s GHG impacts would be less than significant.
Contrary to SAFER’s comments on other projects (e.g., SAFER’s November 8, 2022 letter to the Culver City Planning Commission regarding the Culver Crossing Project, SAFER’s November 3, 2020 letter to the City of Los Angeles Planning and Land Use Management Committee regarding the Times Mirror Square Project FEIR) in which they specifically called for use of the 3,000 MTCO2e threshold, SAFER now claims that threshold is not appropriate. SAFER maintains that an efficiency metric should be used instead.
As set forth in the December 5, 2008 Staff Report to the SCAQMD Board,9 the SCAQMD’s Interim GHG Significance Threshold establishes four tiers for assessing a project’s GHG impacts. Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA. If the project qualifies for an exemption, no further action is required. If the project does not qualify for an exemption, then it would move to Tier 2.
Tier 2 consists of determining whether the project is consistent with a GHG reduction plan that may be part of a local general plan, for example. If the project is consistent with a qualifying local GHG reduction plan, it would not have a significant impact due to GHG emissions. If the project is not consistent with a local GHG reduction plan, there is no approved plan, or the GHG reduction plan does not include all the required components, the project would move to Tier 3.
Tier 3 is the brightline threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e that the City has adopted as its threshold of significance. If the project’s GHG emissions are below this Tier 3 threshold, its GHG impacts are less than significant. A project only moves to Tier 4 if it exceeds the GHG screening significance threshold level and its GHG emissions cannot be mitigated to less than the screening level.
Tier 4 consists of a decision tree approach that allows the lead agency to choose one of three compliance options based on performance standards, one of which is the efficiency metric used by SWAPE. However, as set forth in the December 5, 2008 Staff Report, SCAQMD staff did not recommend Tier 4 approval to the 9 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. South Coast Air Quality Management District Board Meeting Agenda No. 3, December 8, 2008. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgboardsynopsis.pdf. 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1267 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
SCAQMD Board. SWAPE cites the minutes from a 2010 meeting of the GHG Significance Threshold Working Group, which has been inactive since 2011, which were never formally presented to the SCAQMD Board. Moreover, the City, as lead agency, has not adopted the efficiency metric as a GHG significance threshold. In any event, even if the City had adopted the full four tier approach, Tier 4 would not apply since the Project’s GHG emissions are below the Tier 3 brightline threshold.
III. There is Substantial Evidence that the Project May have a Significant Health Risk Impact.
SAFER and SWAPE assert that the Project may result in significant health impacts due to diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions during construction and operation and that the City should have prepared a quantified health risk assessment (HRA) related to such emissions. The City as lead agency has the discretion to select the appropriate thresholds of significance and methodologies for evaluating a project’s impacts, including potential impacts related to health risks. SAFER and SWAPE have not provided any credible evidence to demonstrate that a quantified HRA related to on-site sources of toxic air contaminants (TACs) is required under CEQA or that the City abused its discretion in not requiring one.
A. Construction. The MND correctly identified that proposed construction activities would be limited in duration and short-term. SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook does not recommend analysis of TACs from short-term construction activities associated with land use development projects. The rationale for not requiring an HRA for construction activities is the limited duration of exposure. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of individual cancer risk.
Specifically, “Individual Cancer Risk” is the likelihood that a person continuously exposed to concentrations of toxic air contaminants (TACs) over a 70-year lifetime will contract cancer based on the use of standard risk assessment methodology, and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) guidance evaluates residential exposure over a 30-year duration.
Because the construction schedule for the Project would be limited to approximately 11 months, construction of the Project would not result in a substantial, long-term (i.e., 70-year) source of TAC emissions. No residual emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk are anticipated after construction as the Project does not include any substantial operational sources of TAC emissions, as discussed below. Because there is such a short-term exposure period (approximately 11 months out of a 70-year lifetime), further evaluation of construction TAC emissions in an HRA is not warranted. Therefore, Project-related TAC emission impacts during construction would be less than significant and would not result in a significant health risk impact. 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1268 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
B. Operations. From an operational standpoint, the Project would not include any land uses or activities that would involve the use, storage, or processing of carcinogenic toxic air contaminants. In addition, the proposed land use would not involve the substantial use of heavy-duty diesel trucks. On April 28, 2005, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) published the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook to serve as a general guide for considering health effects associated with siting sensitive receptors proximate to significant sources of TAC emissions, including DPM. The goal of the guidance document is to protect sensitive receptors, such as children, the elderly, acutely ill, and chronically ill persons, from exposure to TAC emissions. Among other things, the ARB considers distribution and warehouse uses that accommodate more than 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units (TRUs) per day as having significant sources of TAC emissions that should be buffered from sensitive land uses.10
As set forth in Table 1 of the Technical Memorandum prepared by Fehr & Peers attached as Appendix G to the IS/MND, the Project would only generate 22 truck trips per day. Even conservatively assuming that all these trucks will have operating TRUs, the Project would not be considered to be a substantial source of TACs. In addition, the ARB-mandated Air Toxics Control Measure for diesel emission limits diesel-fueled commercial vehicles (delivery trucks) to idle for no more than five minutes at any given time, which would further limit diesel particulate emissions. Therefore, an operational HRA is not warranted.
C. OEHHA Guidance. SAFER and SWAPE also claim that an HRA is required under guidance from the OEHHA. It is important to understand the purpose of the OEHHA guidance as it is not applicable to the Project. OEHHA adopted the Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Risk Assessments (2003 Guidance Manual) in October 2003. The Guidance Manual was developed by OEHHA, in conjunction with the California Air Resources Board (ARB), for use in implementing the Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program (Health and Safety Code Section 44360 et seq.). The Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program requires certain stationary sources to report the types and quantities of certain substances routinely released into the air. The goals of the Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program are to collect emission data, to identify facilities having localized impacts, to ascertain health risks, to notify nearby residents of significant risks, and to reduce those significant risks to acceptable levels.
10 California Air Resources Board. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook (April 28, 2005), Table 1-1 and page 14:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-05/Land%20Use%20Handbook_0.pdf 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1269 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
OEHHA adopted a new version of the Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Risk Assessments (2015 Guidance Manual)11 in March of 2015. The ARB acknowledges that the 2015 Guidance Manual does not include guidance for projects prepared under the auspices of CEQA and that it would be “handled by individual [Air Pollution Control] Districts.” As noted by the ARB:
The Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588, 1987, Connelly) was enacted in September 1987. Under this, stationary sources are required to report the types and quantities of certain substances their facilities routinely release into the air. Emissions of interest are those that result from the routine operation of a facility or that are predictable, including but not limited to continuous and intermittent releases and process upsets or leaks…
The Act requires that toxic air emissions from stationary sources (facilities) be quantified and compiled into an inventory according to criteria and guidelines developed by the ARB, that each facility be prioritized to determine whether a risk assessment must be conducted, that the risk assessments be conducted according to methods developed by OEHHA…12
There are two broad classes of facilities subject to the AB 2588 Program: core facilities and facilities identified within discrete industry-wide source categories.
Core facilities subject to AB 2588 compliance are sources whose criteria pollutant emissions (particulate matter, oxides of sulfur, oxides of nitrogen, and volatile organic compounds) are 25 tons per year or more, as well as those facilities whose criteria pollutant emissions are 10 tons per year or more but less than 25 tons per year. Industry-wide source facilities are classified as smaller operations with relatively similar emission profiles (e.g., auto body shops, gas stations, and dry cleaners using perchloroethylene). It is apparent that the emissions generated from the construction and subsequent occupancy of the Project are not classified as core operations nor subject to industry-wide source evaluation.
The intent in developing the 2015 Guidance Manual was to provide HRA procedures for use in the Air Toxics Hot Spots Program or for the permitting of new or modified stationary sources. As noted above, the Project is not a new or modified stationary source that requires air quality permits to construct or 11 12
Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. Office of Health Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program. February 2015. https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf.
California Air Resources Board, Overview of the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/overview-air-toxics-hot-spots-information-and-assessment-act. 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1270 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
operate. Air districts are to determine which facilities will prepare an HRA based on prioritization process. The 2015 Guidance Manual provides a recommendations related to cancer risk evaluation of short-term projects regarding certain stationary sources. As discussed in Section 8.2.10 of the 2015 Guidance Manual, “[t]he local air pollution control districts sometimes use the risk assessment guidelines for the Hot Spots program in permitting decisions for short-term projects such as construction or waste site remediation.” Short-term projects that would require a permitting decision by SCAQMD typically would be limited to site remediation (e.g., stationary soil vapor extractors) and would not be applicable to the Project. The 2015 Guidance Manual does not provide specific recommendations for evaluation of short-term use of mobile sources (e.g., heavyduty diesel construction equipment).
Based on the foregoing, the OEHHA guidance does not require preparation of a quantified HRA in this case.
D. Use of Age Sensitivity Factors. For its screening level HRA SWAPE used OEHHA’s 2015 Guidance Manual’s Age Sensitivity Factors (ASFs) to account for potential increased sensitivity of early-in-life exposure to carcinogens. For risk assessments conducted under the auspices of AB 2588, a weighting factor is applied to all carcinogens regardless of purported mechanism of action. In comments presented to the SCAQMD Governing Board (Meeting Date: June 5, 2015, Agenda No. 28) relating to TAC exposures under Rules 1401 (New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants), use of the 2015 OEHHA guidelines and their applicability for projects subject to CEQA, as they relate to the incorporation of early-life exposure adjustments, it was reported that:
The Proposed Amended Rules are separate from the CEQA significance thresholds. The Response to Comments Staff Report PAR 1401, 1401.1, 1402, and 212 A - 8 June 2015 SCAQMD staff is currently evaluating how to implement the Revised OEHHA Guidelines under CEQA. The SCAQMD staff will evaluate a variety of options on how to evaluate health risks under the Revised OEHHA Guidelines under CEQA. The SCAQMD staff will conduct public workshops to gather input before bringing recommendations to the Governing Board.
SCAQMD, as a commenting agency, has neither conducted public workshops nor developed policy relating to the applicability of applying the 2015 OEHHA guidance for projects prepared by other public/lead agencies subject to CEQA.
To emphasize variability in methodology for conducting HRAs, regulatory agencies throughout the state, including the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), which is charged with protecting individuals and the environment from the effects of toxic substances and is responsible for assessing, 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1271 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
investigating and evaluating sensitive receptor populations to ensure that properties are free of contamination or that health protective remediation levels are achieved, have adopted the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA’s) policy in the application of early-life exposure adjustments.
Specifically, USEPA guidance relating to the use of early life exposure adjustments (Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Susceptibility from Early-Life Exposure to Carcinogens, EPA/630/R-003F) are considered when carcinogens act “through the mutagenic mode of action.” As reported:
The Agency considered both the advantages and disadvantages of extending the recommended, age dependent adjustment factors for carcinogenic potency to carcinogenic agents for which the mode of action remains unknown. EPA recommends these factors only for carcinogens acting through a mutagenic mode of action based on a combination of analysis of available data and long-standing science policy positions that set out the Agency’s overall approach to carcinogen risk assessment, e.g., the use of a linear, no threshold extrapolation procedure in the absence of data in order to be health protective. In general, the Agency prefers to rely on analyses of data rather than on general defaults. When data are available for a susceptible life stage, they should be used directly to evaluate risks for that chemical and that life stage on a case-by-case basis.
In the case of nonmutagenic carcinogens, when the mode of action is unknown, the data were judged by EPA to be too limited and the modes of action too diverse to use this as a category for which a general default adjustment factor approach can be applied. In this situation per the Agency’s Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment, a linear low-dose extrapolation methodology is recommended. It is the Agency’s longstanding science policy position that use of the linear low-dose extrapolation approach (without further adjustment) provides adequate public health conservatism in the absence of chemical-specific data indicating differential early-life susceptibility or when the mode of action is not mutagenicity.
Based on a review of relevant guidance on the applicability of the use of early life exposure adjustments to identified carcinogens, the use of these factors would not be applicable to the Project as neither the City, as lead agency, nor SCAQMD requires that these factors be used for CEQA analyses of potential DPM construction or operational impacts. The City relies upon USEPA guidance relating to the use of early life exposure adjustment factors (Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Susceptibility from Early-Life Exposure to Carcinogens, EPA/630/R-003F), whereby adjustment factors are only considered when carcinogens act “through the mutagenic mode of action.” As discussed above, PAHs and their derivatives within diesel particulate, which are known to exhibit 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1272 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
a mutagenic mode of action, comprise less than one percent of the exhaust particulate mass. To date, the USEPA reports that whole diesel engine exhaust has not been shown to elicit a mutagenic mode of action. Therefore, a quantified HRA using ASFs is not required, and the City as the lead agency has the discretion to select the appropriate thresholds of significance and methodologies based on the above supporting evidence for evaluating the Project’s impacts, including potential impacts related to health risk.
E. Limitations of the AERSCREEN Model. SWAPE prepared its HRA using the screening level AERSCREEN model, which is known to be conservative. In other words, the AERSCREEN model is known to overestimate impacts for several reasons. The AERSCREEN model assumes the DPM emissions are emitted from a single location, whereas in reality, DPM emissions are geographically dispersed.
For instance, off-road construction equipment emissions would be generated at the Project Site, whereas on-road truck emissions would be generated primarily on roadways near the Project Site. When conducting HRAs, the geographic distribution of pollutants associated with a project is a critical and important consideration because health risk impacts are a direct result of TAC concentrations. The AERSCREEN model, by its very design, cannot account for this type of geographic distribution of emissions. Furthermore, the AERSCREEN model cannot account for the temporal distribution of emissions. For instance, construction emissions would be overwhelmingly generated during the daytime hours when atmospheric dispersion of TACs is greater, and the AERSCREEN model by its very design cannot account for this type of temporal distribution of emissions. Additionally, the AERSCREEN model does not have the capability to utilize real-world meteorological data to calculate the effects of wind speed and wind direction on pollutant concentrations. These factors are critical when conducting HRAs in order to more accurately determine modeled pollutant concentrations, and excluding these factors will result in concentrations of pollutants at modeled receptor locations that are artificially elevated to highly unreasonable levels.
Not only was use of the AERSCREEN model inherently flawed, for the aforementioned reasons, but it was also applied incorrectly. The proposed facility was modeled as an “area source,” in which emissions are assumed to be uniformly distributed within a defined area in a horizontal plane. Use of area sources is appropriate for fugitive emissions, such as those of dust, but is inappropriate for exhaust emissions of diesel particulate matter which, as results of inertia and combustion heat, rise substantially into the atmosphere before being dispersed.
Because dispersion process begins at altitude, ground level concentrations near the source are lower than those calculated with the area source assumption, The standard practice for decades has been to use “volume sources” for the types of exhaust emission sources associated with the proposed project. Indeed, to develop screening values for its localized significance analysis method, the 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1273 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
SCAQMD used dispersion modeling with area sources for fugitive dust and volume sources for other emission sources.13
CONCLUSIONS
• A refrigerated warehouse was never proposed for this project and to analyze one now would be speculative. Nevertheless, UltraSystems ran CalEEMod for the case of a refrigerated warehouse of the same size as the one modeled for the IS/MND. Criteria pollutant and GHG emissions, along with electricity consumption, would be higher than for the nonrefrigerated case, but would still be less than significant. Therefore, not assuming a refrigerated warehouse was not credible evidence that impacts have been understated.
•
•
Instead of using CalEEMod’s default input parameters, such as the construction schedule and equipment deployment, the City relied upon project-specific estimates by a construction firm having extensive experience in building warehouses in the area. Neither SAFER nor SWAPE has presented credible evidence that the contractor’s information is inaccurate or understates impacts.
The estimates of soil export and import during grading were developed by experts in warehouse construction. SAFER and SWAPE do not provide credible evidence that these estimates are inaccurate. When entering the soil import value into CalEEMod, UEI staff conservatively did not use the soil exports to partially offset the soil import requirement. Therefore, emissions from soil export were overestimated in the original modeling. In the evaluation of the refrigerated warehouse case, exports were subtracted from imports.
•
•
It is true that the amount of required demolition was not substantiated. As the City was unable to provide an estimate of demolition square footage, UEI took the extremely conservative approach of using the entire project site area as input to the demolition emissions calculation. Thus, demolition emissions are overstated but still less than significant.
SAFER and SWAPE claim that the GHG analysis is flawed because the air quality modeling used incorrect inputs. For the reasons previously stated, the air quality modeling did not use CalEEMod default inputs, but rather used more accurate, Project-specific information. Therefore, the GHG modeling, which is also based on the same information, is also correct, and 13 Chico, T. and Koizumi, J. 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA. July. Available online at https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-lst-methodology-document.pdf?sfvrsn=2. 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1274 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
SAFER and SWAPE have not presented credible evidence that GHG impacts have been understated.
•
•
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a) provides that the City, as lead agency, has the discretion to determine whether to use a quantitative GHG emissions threshold or a qualitative or performance-based one. The City has chosen to use 3,000 metric tons per year of CO2e as a brightline significance threshold. SAFER and SWAPE have not presented credible evidence that any other type of threshold is required.
The ARB considers distribution and warehouse uses that accommodate more than 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units (TRUs) per day as having significant sources of TAC emissions that should be buffered from sensitive land uses. The Project would only generate 22 truck trips per day. Even conservatively assuming that all these trucks will have operating TRUs, the Project would not be considered to be a substantial source of TACs. In addition, the ARBmandated Air Toxics Control Measure for diesel emission limits dieselfueled commercial vehicles (delivery trucks) to idle for no more than five minutes at any given time, which would further limit diesel particulate emissions. Therefore, an operational HRA is not warranted. • SAFER and SWAPE have presented the results of a screening health risk assessment that used the AERSCREEN model to calculate exposures to diesel particulate matter. The results of their analysis are not credible because the AERSCREEN model, by its very design, cannot account for the Project’s geographic distribution of emissions. Furthermore, the AERSCREEN model cannot account for the temporal distribution of emissions, and it does not use Project-specific meteorology. Finally, SWAPE used the “area source” option for emissions, which is not appropriate for engine exhaust. In summary, SAFER and SWAPE have not presented credible evidence that health risks from the Project would be significant.
• For its screening level HRA, SWAPE used OEHHA’s 2015 Guidance Manual’s Age Sensitivity Factors (ASFs) to account for potential increased sensitivity of early-in-life exposure to carcinogens. The SCAQMD has neither conducted public workshops nor developed policies relating to applying the 2015 OEHHA guidance for projects prepared by other public/lead agencies subject to CEQA. Other agencies follow USEPA recommendations to evaluate early life exposures only for carcinogens having a mutagenic mode of action. The USEPA reports that whole diesel engine exhaust has not been shown to elicit a mutagenic mode of action.
Therefore, SWAPE’s does-response calculations overestimate the Project’s 01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1275 – 1497
Memo to Luis Torrico
September 19, 2024
health risks and are not credible evidence that health risks from the Project would be significant.
In conclusion SAFER and SWAPE have not presented credible evidence that the proposed Project will result in significant criteria pollutant, GHG or health impacts.
Attachments
01171.0005/1016461.1 Page 1276 – 1497
❖ ATTACHMENTS ❖
Attachment 1
CALEEMOD RESULTS FOR REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE CASE
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size
6.00 Metric
1000sqft
1000sqft
Acre
Lot Acreage
0.14 Floor Surface Area
6,000.00
Population
General Office Building
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
Other Asphalt Surfaces
Parking Lot
0 0
0 0
0 57.75
0.12 1.33 57,750.00
0.12 5,227.20
27.53 0.36
1000sqft
Acre
0.63 27,532.00
City Park 0.36 15,709.00
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2 Intensity 390.98
(lb/MWhr)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Total project site area
Construction Phase - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Trips and VMT -
Demolition -
Grading - Client sent data.
Architectural Coating -
Area Coating - Match original model.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Fleet Mix -
Table Name Column Name Default Value
0 New Value
tblConstDustMitigation 15
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblGrading
WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed
NumDays 10.00
220.00
20.00 6.00
23.00 109.00
15.00 20.00
11.00 7.00
NumDays
NumDays
NumDays
NumDays 10.00
NumDays 3.00
NumDays 3.00 21.00
2,679.00
27,532.00
15,709.00
1.00 MaterialImported
LandUseSquareFeet
LandUseSquareFeet
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
UsageHours
0.00 tblLandUse 27,530.00
15,681.60
2.00 tblLandUse
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
3.00 1.00
2.00 1.00
7.00 8.00
UsageHours 7.00 8.00
UsageHours 7.00 Page 1279 – 1497 8.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.3753 0.6885 0.6373 1.7900e0030.1063 0.0270 0.1332 0.0213 0.0251 0.0463 0.0000 158.8751 158.8751 0.0297 7.1500e- 161.7499 003
Maximum 0.3753 0.6885 0.6373 1.7900e0030.1063 0.0270 0.1332 0.0213 0.0251 0.0463 0.0000 158.8751 158.8751 0.0297 7.1500e- 161.7499 003
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.3753 0.6885 0.6373 1.7900e0030.0728 0.0270 0.0998 0.0163 0.0251 0.0414 0.0000 158.8750 158.8750 0.0297 7.1500e- 161.7498 003
Maximum 0.3753 0.6885 0.6373 1.7900e0030.0728 0.0270 0.0998 0.0163 0.0251 0.0414 0.0000 158.8750 158.8750 0.0297 7.1500e- 161.7498 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.47 0.00 25.11 23.24 0.00 10.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 2
3 1-1-2023
4-1-2023
7-1-2023
3-31-2023
6-30-2023
9-30-2023
Highest
0.3015
0.2914
0.1600
0.3015
0.3015
0.2914
0.1600
0.3015
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area
Energy
Mobile
Waste
Water
Total
0.2627 1.0000e0051.1700e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
12.1571
4.5752
16.7323
2.2800e0032.2800e0031.0000e0050.0000 2.4300e003
6.5000e0045.9200e0034.9700e0034.0000e0054.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e004192.5932 192.5932 218.6717 218.6717
0.0158
0.0145
0.7185
0.4729
1.2217
2.0200e- 193.5918
003
0.0972 0.1162 1.0560 2.3600e0030.2511 1.7100e0030.2528
0.0000
0.0000
0.2533
0.0670 1.5900e0030.0686
0.0000
0.0000
0.0690
9.2400e- 221.7875
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 12.1571
40.0095
0.0000
0.0115
0.0227
30.1188
55.2466
500.7471
35.4343
0.3606 0.1221 1.0622 2.4000e0030.2511 2.1600e0030.0670 2.0400e003446.7016 463.4339
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area
Energy
Mobile
Waste
Water
Total
0.2627 1.0000e0051.1700e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
12.1571
4.5752
16.7323
2.2800e0032.2800e0031.0000e0050.0000 2.4300e003
6.5000e0045.9200e0034.9700e0034.0000e0054.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e004192.5932 192.5932 218.6717 218.6717
0.0158
0.0145
0.7185
0.4729
1.2217
2.0200e- 193.5918
003
0.0972 0.1162 1.0560 2.3600e0030.2511 1.7100e0030.2528
0.0000
0.0000
0.2533
0.0670 1.5900e0030.0686
0.0000
0.0000
0.0690
9.2400e- 221.7875
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 12.1571
40.0095
0.0000
0.0115
0.0227
30.1188
55.2466
500.7471
35.4343
0.3606 0.1221 1.0622 2.4000e0030.2511 2.1600e0030.0670 2.0400e003446.7016 463.4339 ROG NOx CO SO2
0.00 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4
0.00 N20 CO2e
Percent 0.00
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Week
Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition
Site Preparation
Grading
1/1/2023
1/21/2023
2/1/2023
1/20/2023 5
5 5
15 2 7
3 Site Preparation
Grading
1/31/2023
2/28/2023 20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4 5
6 7
8 Building Construction
Utility Trenching and Installation
Landscaping
Building Construction
Trenching
3/1/2023
8/1/2023
9/1/2023
9/1/2023
10/1/2023
7/31/2023
8/31/2023
9/30/2023
9/15/2023
11/1/2023
5 5
5 5
5 109
23 21
11 23
Site Preparation
Paving Paving
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10
Acres of Paving: 0.75
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 95,625; Non-Residential Outdoor: 31,875; Striped Parking Area: 1,966 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours
8.00 Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 0.37
1 1
1 1
1 4
1 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
97 Site Preparation 97
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Excavators
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
0.37 0.38
0.41 0.38
0.37 0.56
0.29 0.20
0.37 0.37
0.56 0.43
0.38 0.37
158
187
402
97 9
Grading Graders
Grading Off-Highway Trucks
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Cement and Mortar Mixers
Cranes
Grading
Building Construction
Building Construction
Building Construction
Utility Trenching and Installation
Landscaping
Paving
231
89 97
97 9
Forklifts
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Cement and Mortar Mixers
Plate Compactors
Rollers
Paving 8
Paving 80
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Architectural Coating Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Hauling
Number Number Length Length Length
Demolition 1
1 4
7 1
1 4
1 3.00 0.00 512.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
Site Preparation
Grading
3.00 10.00
47.00 3.00
0.00 0.00
18.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
335.00
0.00 14.70
14.70 14.70
14.70 14.70
14.70 14.70
6.90 6.90
6.90 6.90
6.90 6.90
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
Building Construction
Utility Trenching and
Landscaping
0.00 3.00 0.00
Paving 10.00
9.00 0.00
Architectural Coating 0.00
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.0554 0.0000 0.0554 8.3800e0030.0000 8.3800e0030.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.0519
2.0519
0.0000
2.0519
2.0519
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.0685
2.0685
1.1400e0030.0115 0.0167 2.0000e0055.7000e0045.7000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0046.6000e004
1.1400e0030.0115 0.0167 2.0000e0050.0554 5.7000e0040.0559 8.3800e0035.2000e0048.9000e0036.6000e004 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
5.4000e0040.0352
0.0000
8.9600e0031.5000e0044.4000e0032.1000e0044.6200e0031.2100e0032.0000e0041.4100e0030.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
14.9317
0.0000
0.1963
15.1280
14.9317
0.0000
0.1963
15.1280
8.2000e0042.3700e00315.6589
0.0000
0.1979
15.8568
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
7.0000e0056.0000e0057.7000e0042.5000e0042.5000e0047.0000e0057.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e005
6.1000e0040.0353 9.7300e0031.5000e0044.6500e0032.1000e0044.8700e0031.2800e0032.0000e0041.4800e0038.3000e0042.3800e003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.0249 0.0000 0.0249 3.7700e0030.0000 3.7700e0030.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.0519
2.0519
0.0000
2.0519
2.0519
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.0685
2.0685
1.1400e0030.0115 0.0167 2.0000e0055.7000e0045.7000e0045.2000e0045.2000e0046.6000e004
1.1400e0030.0115 0.0167 2.0000e0050.0249 5.7000e0040.0255 3.7700e0035.2000e0044.2900e0036.6000e004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
5.4000e0040.0352
0.0000
8.9600e0031.5000e0044.4000e0032.1000e0044.6200e0031.2100e0032.0000e0041.4100e0030.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
14.9317
0.0000
0.1963
15.1280
14.9317
0.0000
0.1963
15.1280
8.2000e0042.3700e00315.6589
0.0000
0.1979
15.8568
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
7.0000e0056.0000e0057.7000e0042.5000e0042.5000e0047.0000e0057.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e005
6.1000e0040.0353 9.7300e0031.5000e0044.6500e0032.1000e0044.8700e0031.2800e0032.0000e0041.4800e0038.3000e0042.3800e003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.9576
0.9576
0.0000
0.9576
0.9576
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.9653
0.9653
5.3000e0045.3700e0037.8100e0031.0000e0052.7000e0042.7000e0042.4000e0042.4000e0043.1000e004
5.3000e0045.3700e0037.8100e0031.0000e0050.0000 2.7000e0042.7000e0040.0000 2.4000e0042.4000e0043.1000e004 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0916
0.0916
0.0000
0.0000
0.0916
0.0916
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0924
0.0924
3.0000e0053.0000e0053.6000e0041.2000e0041.2000e0043.0000e0053.0000e005
3.0000e0053.0000e0053.6000e0041.2000e0041.2000e0043.0000e0053.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.9576
0.9576
0.0000
0.9576
0.9576
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.9653
0.9653
5.3000e0045.3700e0037.8100e0031.0000e0052.7000e0042.7000e0042.4000e0042.4000e0043.1000e004
5.3000e0045.3700e0037.8100e0031.0000e0050.0000 2.7000e0042.7000e0040.0000 2.4000e0042.4000e0043.1000e004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0916
0.0916
0.0000
0.0000
0.0916
0.0916
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0924
0.0924
3.0000e0053.0000e0053.6000e0041.2000e0041.2000e0043.0000e0053.0000e005
3.0000e0053.0000e0053.6000e0041.2000e0041.2000e0043.0000e0053.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
5.4500e0030.0000 5.4500e0036.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0040.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
24.6974
24.6974
0.0000
24.6974
24.6974
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
24.8971
24.8971
0.0123 0.1131 0.1047 2.8000e0044.3100e0034.3100e0033.9700e0033.9700e0037.9900e003
0.0123 0.1131 0.1047 2.8000e0045.4500e0034.3100e0039.7600e0036.0000e0043.9700e0034.5700e0037.9900e003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
3.5000e0040.0230
0.0000
5.8700e0031.0000e0042.8800e0031.4000e0043.0200e0037.9000e0041.3000e0049.2000e0040.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
9.7698
0.0000
0.8722
10.6420
9.7698
0.0000
0.8722
10.6420
5.4000e0041.5500e00310.2456
0.0000
0.8796
11.1251
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3.2000e0042.5000e0043.4100e0031.0000e0051.1000e0031.0000e0051.1000e0032.9000e0041.0000e0053.0000e0042.0000e0052.0000e005
6.7000e0040.0233 9.2800e0031.1000e0043.9800e0031.5000e0044.1200e0031.0800e0031.4000e0041.2200e0035.6000e0041.5700e003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Grading - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
2.4500e0030.0000 2.4500e0032.7000e0040.0000 2.7000e0040.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
24.6974
24.6974
0.0000
24.6974
24.6974
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
24.8971
24.8971
0.0123 0.1131 0.1047 2.8000e0044.3100e0034.3100e0033.9700e0033.9700e0037.9900e003
0.0123 0.1131 0.1047 2.8000e0042.4500e0034.3100e0036.7600e0032.7000e0043.9700e0034.2400e0037.9900e003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
3.5000e0040.0230
0.0000
5.8700e0031.0000e0042.8800e0031.4000e0043.0200e0037.9000e0041.3000e0049.2000e0040.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
9.7698
0.0000
0.8722
10.6420
9.7698
0.0000
0.8722
10.6420
5.4000e0041.5500e00310.2456
0.0000
0.8796
11.1251
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3.2000e0042.5000e0043.4100e0031.0000e0051.1000e0031.0000e0051.1000e0032.9000e0041.0000e0053.0000e0042.0000e0052.0000e005
6.7000e0040.0233 9.2800e0031.1000e0043.9800e0031.5000e0044.1200e0031.0800e0031.4000e0041.2200e0035.6000e0041.5700e003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0431 0.3928 0.2920 6.4000e0040.0183 0.0183 0.0171 0.0171 0.0000 52.2571 52.2571 0.0147 0.0000 52.6248 Total 0.0431 0.3928 0.2920 6.4000e0040.0183 0.0183 0.0171 0.0171 0.0000 52.2571 52.2571 0.0147 0.0000 52.6248 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000 0.0000
0.0395
0.0000
0.0148
0.0873
0.1021
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
17.8368
22.3425
40.1793
0.0000
17.8368
22.3425
40.1793
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
18.6166
22.5307
41.1473
1.1100e0031.8000e0046.1800e0031.9000e0046.3700e0031.7800e0031.8000e0041.9700e0036.0000e0042.5700e003
8.1300e0036.4500e0032.4000e0040.0281 1.7000e0040.0282 7.4600e0031.6000e0047.6100e0035.9000e0045.8000e004
9.2400e0030.0460 4.2000e0040.0343 3.6000e0040.0346 9.2400e0033.4000e0049.5800e0031.1900e0033.1500e003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0431 0.3928 0.2920 6.4000e0040.0183 0.0183 0.0171 0.0171 0.0000 52.2570 52.2570 0.0147 0.0000 52.6247 Total 0.0431 0.3928 0.2920 6.4000e0040.0183 0.0183 0.0171 0.0171 0.0000 52.2570 52.2570 0.0147 0.0000 52.6247 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000 0.0000
0.0395
0.0000
0.0148
0.0873
0.1021
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
17.8368
22.3425
40.1793
0.0000
17.8368
22.3425
40.1793
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
18.6166
22.5307
41.1473
1.1100e0031.8000e0046.1800e0031.9000e0046.3700e0031.7800e0031.8000e0041.9700e0036.0000e0042.5700e003
8.1300e0036.4500e0032.4000e0040.0281 1.7000e0040.0282 7.4600e0031.6000e0047.6100e0035.9000e0045.8000e004
9.2400e0030.0460 4.2000e0040.0343 3.6000e0040.0346 9.2400e0033.4000e0049.5800e0031.1900e0033.1500e003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Utility Trenching and Installation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 1.7400e0030.0177 0.0257 4.0000e0058.7000e0048.7000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 3.1462 3.1462 1.0200e0030.0000 3.1717 Total 1.7400e0030.0177 0.0257 4.0000e0058.7000e0048.7000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 3.1462 3.1462 1.0200e0030.0000 3.1717 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.3009
0.3009
0.0000
0.0000
0.3009
0.3009
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.3035
0.3035
1.1000e0049.0000e0051.1800e0033.8000e0043.8000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005
1.1000e0049.0000e0051.1800e0033.8000e0043.8000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Utility Trenching and Installation - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 1.7400e0030.0177 0.0257 4.0000e0058.7000e0048.7000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 3.1462 3.1462 1.0200e0030.0000 3.1717 Total 1.7400e0030.0177 0.0257 4.0000e0058.7000e0048.7000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 3.1462 3.1462 1.0200e0030.0000 3.1717 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.3009
0.3009
0.0000
0.0000
0.3009
0.3009
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.3035
0.3035
1.1000e0049.0000e0051.1800e0033.8000e0043.8000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005
1.1000e0049.0000e0051.1800e0033.8000e0043.8000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.7 Landscaping - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.8727
2.8727
0.0000
2.8727
2.8727
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.8959
2.8959
1.5900e0030.0161 0.0234 3.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0047.3000e0047.3000e0049.3000e004
1.5900e0030.0161 0.0234 3.0000e0050.0000 8.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 7.3000e0047.3000e0049.3000e004 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.2748
0.2748
0.0000
0.0000
0.2748
0.2748
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.2771
0.2771
1.0000e0048.0000e0051.0700e0033.5000e0043.5000e0049.0000e0059.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e005
1.0000e0048.0000e0051.0700e0033.5000e0043.5000e0049.0000e0059.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.7 Landscaping - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.8727
2.8727
0.0000
2.8727
2.8727
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.8959
2.8959
1.5900e0030.0161 0.0234 3.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0047.3000e0047.3000e0049.3000e004
1.5900e0030.0161 0.0234 3.0000e0050.0000 8.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 7.3000e0047.3000e0049.3000e004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.2748
0.2748
0.0000
0.0000
0.2748
0.2748
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.2771
0.2771
1.0000e0048.0000e0051.0700e0033.5000e0043.5000e0049.0000e0059.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e005
1.0000e0048.0000e0051.0700e0033.5000e0043.5000e0049.0000e0059.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.8 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road
Paving
Total
2.2200e0030.0207 0.0253 4.0000e0051.0400e0031.0400e0039.6000e0049.6000e0040.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.1967
0.0000
3.1967
3.1967
0.0000
3.1967
9.4000e0040.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.2202
0.0000
3.2202
9.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3.2000e0030.0207 0.0253 4.0000e0051.0400e0031.0400e0039.6000e0049.6000e0049.4000e004 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4797
0.4797
0.0000
0.0000
0.4797
0.4797
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4838
0.4838
1.7000e0041.4000e0041.8700e0031.0000e0056.0000e0046.1000e0041.6000e0041.6000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005
1.7000e0041.4000e0041.8700e0031.0000e0056.0000e0046.1000e0041.6000e0041.6000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.8 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road
Paving
Total
2.2200e0030.0207 0.0253 4.0000e0051.0400e0031.0400e0039.6000e0049.6000e0040.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.1967
0.0000
3.1967
3.1967
0.0000
3.1967
9.4000e0040.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.2202
0.0000
3.2202
9.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3.2000e0030.0207 0.0253 4.0000e0051.0400e0031.0400e0039.6000e0049.6000e0049.4000e004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4797
0.4797
0.0000
0.0000
0.4797
0.4797
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4838
0.4838
1.7000e0041.4000e0041.8700e0031.0000e0056.0000e0046.1000e0041.6000e0041.6000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005
1.7000e0041.4000e0041.8700e0031.0000e0056.0000e0046.1000e0041.6000e0041.6000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.9 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating
Off-Road
Total
0.3000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.6966
1.6966
0.0000
1.6966
1.6966
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.7103
1.7103
4.0000e0046.1300e0030.0126 2.0000e0051.1000e0041.1000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0045.5000e004
0.3004 6.1300e0030.0126 2.0000e0051.1000e0041.1000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0045.5000e004 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.9028
0.9028
0.0000
0.0000
0.9028
0.9028
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.9104
0.9104
3.3000e0042.6000e0043.5300e0031.0000e0051.1300e0031.0000e0051.1400e0033.0000e0041.0000e0053.1000e0042.0000e0052.0000e005
3.3000e0042.6000e0043.5300e0031.0000e0051.1300e0031.0000e0051.1400e0033.0000e0041.0000e0053.1000e0042.0000e0052.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.9 Architectural Coating - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating
Off-Road
Total
0.3000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.6966
1.6966
0.0000
1.6966
1.6966
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.7103
1.7103
4.0000e0046.1300e0030.0126 2.0000e0051.1000e0041.1000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0045.5000e004
0.3004 6.1300e0030.0126 2.0000e0051.1000e0041.1000e0041.0000e0041.0000e0045.5000e004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.9028
0.9028
0.0000
0.0000
0.9028
0.9028
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.9104
0.9104
3.3000e0042.6000e0043.5300e0031.0000e0051.1300e0031.0000e0051.1400e0033.0000e0041.0000e0053.1000e0042.0000e0052.0000e005
3.3000e0042.6000e0043.5300e0031.0000e0051.1300e0031.0000e0051.1400e0033.0000e0041.0000e0053.1000e0042.0000e0052.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0972
0.0972
0.1162
0.1162
1.0560
1.0560
2.3600e0030.2511
0.2511
1.7100e0030.2528
0.2528
0.0670
0.0670
1.5900e0030.0686
0.0686
0.0000
0.0000
218.6717 218.6717 0.0145
0.0145
9.2400e- 221.7875
003
Unmitigated 2.3600e0031.7100e0031.5900e003218.6717 218.6717 9.2400e- 221.7875 003
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park
General Office Building
Other Asphalt Surfaces
Parking Lot
0.28 58.44
0.00 0.71
13.26 0.00
0.79 4.20
1,191 1,191
142,508 142,508
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
Total
122.43
181.15
122.43
136.40
122.43
127.42
524,700
668,400
524,700
668,400
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use
City Park
H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary 66 Diverted
28 Pass-by
16.60 16.60
8.40 8.40
6.90 6.90
33.00 33.00
48.00 48.00
19.00 19.00
6 General Office Building 77 19 4
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use
Other Asphalt Surfaces
Parking Lot
H-W or C-W
16.60 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
8.40 8.40
8.40 6.90
6.90 6.90
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0
0 0
0 5
0 0
3 16.60
Refrigerated Warehouse-No 16.60 59.00 41.00 92
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
City Park
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
0.542464 0.063735 0.188241
0.188241
0.188241
0.188241
0.188241
0.126899
0.126899
0.126899
0.126899
0.126899
0.023249
0.023249
0.023249
0.023249
0.023249
0.006239
0.006239
0.006239
0.006239
0.006239
0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604
0.000604
0.000604
0.000604
0.000604
0.024795
0.024795
0.024795
0.024795
0.024795
0.000702 0.003352
General Office Building
Other Asphalt Surfaces
Parking Lot
0.542464
0.542464
0.542464
0.542464
0.063735
0.063735
0.063735
0.063735
0.010717
0.010717
0.010717
0.010717
0.008079
0.008079
0.008079
0.008079
0.000923
0.000923
0.000923
0.000923
0.000702
0.000702
0.000702
0.000702
0.003352
0.003352
0.003352
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.003352
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
186.1488 186.1488 0.0157
0.0157
1.9000e- 187.1091
003
Electricity
Unmitigated
186.1488 186.1488 1.9000e- 187.1091
003
NaturalGas
Mitigated
6.5000e0045.9200e0034.9700e0034.0000e0054.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0046.4445
6.4445
6.4445
6.4445
1.2000e0041.2000e0046.4828
NaturalGas 6.4828
Unmitigated
6.5000e0045.9200e0034.9700e0034.0000e0054.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0041.2000e0041.2000e004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use
City Park
kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
0 61860
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.3011
0.0000
0.0000
3.1434
0.0000
3.3011
0.0000
0.0000
3.1434
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3.3207
0.0000
0.0000
3.1621
General Office
Building
3.3000e0043.0300e0032.5500e0032.0000e0052.3000e0042.3000e0042.3000e0042.3000e0046.0000e0056.0000e005 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
58905 3.2000e0042.8900e0032.4300e0032.0000e0052.2000e0042.2000e0042.2000e0042.2000e0046.0000e0056.0000e005 Total 6.5000e0045.9200e0034.9800e0034.0000e0054.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0040.0000 6.4445 6.4445 1.2000e0041.2000e0046.4828
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use
City Park
kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
0 61860
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.3011
0.0000
0.0000
3.1434
0.0000
3.3011
0.0000
0.0000
3.1434
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3.3207
0.0000
0.0000
3.1621
General Office
Building
3.3000e0043.0300e0032.5500e0032.0000e0052.3000e0042.3000e0042.3000e0042.3000e0046.0000e0056.0000e005 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
58905 3.2000e0042.8900e0032.4300e0032.0000e0052.2000e0042.2000e0042.2000e0042.2000e0046.0000e0056.0000e005 Total 6.5000e0045.9200e0034.9800e0034.0000e0054.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0040.0000 6.4445 6.4445 1.2000e0041.2000e0046.4828
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity Total CO2
Use
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use
City Park
kWh/yr MT/yr
0 0.0000
13.3009
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
13.3695
0.0000
1.7178
General Office
Building
75000
0 1.1200e0031.4000e004
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 9636.2
965002
1.7089 1.4000e0042.0000e005
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
171.1389 0.0144 1.7500e- 172.0218
003
Total 186.1488 0.0157 1.9100e- 187.1091
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Mitigated
Electricity Total CO2
Use
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use
City Park
kWh/yr MT/yr
0 0.0000
13.3009
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
13.3695
0.0000
1.7178
General Office
Building
75000
0 1.1200e0031.4000e004
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 9636.2
965002
1.7089 1.4000e0042.0000e005
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
171.1389 0.0144 1.7500e- 172.0218
003
Total 186.1488 0.0157 1.9100e- 187.1091
003
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2627
0.2627
1.0000e0051.1700e0030.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.2800e0032.2800e0031.0000e0050.0000
0.0000
2.4300e003
Unmitigated 1.0000e0051.1700e0032.2800e0032.2800e0031.0000e0052.4300e003
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0300
0.2326
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer 0.0000
Products
Landscaping 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.1700e0030.0000 2.2800e0032.2800e0031.0000e0052.4300e003 Total 0.2627 1.0000e0051.1700e0030.0000 2.2800e0032.2800e0031.0000e0052.4300e003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0300
0.2326
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer 0.0000
Products
Landscaping 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.1700e0030.0000 2.2800e0032.2800e0031.0000e0052.4300e003 Total 0.2627 1.0000e0051.1700e0030.0000 2.2800e0032.2800e0031.0000e0052.4300e003
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 40.0095
40.0095
0.4729
0.4729
0.0115
0.0115
55.2466
Unmitigated 55.2466
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out Total CO2
door Use
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use
City Park
Mgal MT/yr
0 /
0.428933
0.8451
4.0887
0.0000
0.0000
35.0757
7.0000e0051.0000e0050.8495
5.2212
0.0000
0.0000
49.1758
General Office
Building
1.0664 /
0.653602
0.0351
0.0000
0.0000
0.4378
8.6000e004
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0106
Parking Lot
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
13.3547 /
0 Total 40.0095 0.4729 0.0115 55.2466
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
Indoor/Out Total CO2
door Use
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use
City Park
Mgal MT/yr
0 /
0.428933
0.8451
4.0887
0.0000
0.0000
35.0757
7.0000e0051.0000e0050.8495
5.2212
0.0000
0.0000
49.1758
General Office
Building
1.0664 /
0.653602
0.0351
0.0000
0.0000
0.4378
8.6000e004
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0106
Parking Lot
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
13.3547 /
0 Total 40.0095 0.4729 0.0115 55.2466
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 12.1571
12.1571
0.7185
0.7185
0.0000
0.0000
30.1188
Unmitigated 30.1188
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Disposed
Land Use
City Park
tons MT/yr
0.03 5.58
0 6.0900e0033.6000e0040.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0151
2.8062
0.0000
0.0000
27.2975
General Office
Building
1.1327
0.0000
0.0000
11.0184
0.0669
0.0000
0.0000
0.6512
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
Parking Lot 0
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
54.28 Total 12.1571 0.7185 0.0000 30.1188
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 36 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Mitigated
Waste Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Disposed
Land Use
City Park
tons MT/yr
0.03 5.58
0 6.0900e0033.6000e0040.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0151
2.8062
0.0000
0.0000
27.2975
General Office
Building
1.1327
0.0000
0.0000
11.0184
0.0669
0.0000
0.0000
0.6512
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
Parking Lot 0
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
54.28 Total 12.1571 0.7185 0.0000 30.1188
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Boiler Rating
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Page 1313 – 1497 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 37 of 37 Date: 9/19/2024 10:26 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size
6.00 Metric
1000sqft
1000sqft
Acre
Lot Acreage
0.14 Floor Surface Area
6,000.00
Population
General Office Building
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
Other Asphalt Surfaces
Parking Lot
0 0
0 0
0 57.75
0.12 1.33 57,750.00
0.12 5,227.20
27.53 0.36
1000sqft
Acre
0.63 27,532.00
City Park 0.36 15,709.00
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2 Intensity 390.98
(lb/MWhr)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Total project site area
Construction Phase - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Off-road Equipment - Client sent data
Trips and VMT -
Demolition -
Grading - Client sent data.
Architectural Coating -
Area Coating - Match original model.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Fleet Mix -
Table Name Column Name Default Value
0 New Value
tblConstDustMitigation 15
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblGrading
WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed
NumDays 10.00
220.00
20.00 6.00
23.00 109.00
15.00 20.00
11.00 7.00
NumDays
NumDays
NumDays
NumDays 10.00
NumDays 3.00
NumDays 3.00 21.00
2,679.00
27,532.00
15,709.00
1.00 MaterialImported
LandUseSquareFeet
LandUseSquareFeet
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
UsageHours
0.00 tblLandUse 27,530.00
15,681.60
2.00 tblLandUse
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
3.00 1.00
2.00 1.00
7.00 8.00
UsageHours 7.00 8.00
UsageHours 7.00 Page 1316 – 1497 8.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 26.1536 13.5133 11.4150 0.0389 8.0137 0.4458 8.1178 1.2905 0.4107 1.3873 0.0000 3,898.889 3,898.889 0.9423 0.3490 3,974.075 0 0 1
Maximum 26.1536 13.5133 11.4150 0.0389 8.0137 0.4458 8.1178 1.2905 0.4107 1.3873 0.0000 3,898.889 3,898.889 0.9423 0.3490 3,974.075 0 0 1
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 26.1536 13.5133 11.4150 0.0389 3.9532 0.4458 4.0573 0.6757 0.4107 0.7725 0.0000 3,898.889 3,898.889 0.9423 0.3490 3,974.075 0 0 1
Maximum 26.1536 13.5133 11.4150 0.0389 3.9532 0.4458 4.0573 0.6757 0.4107 0.7725 0.0000 3,898.889 3,898.889 0.9423 0.3490 3,974.075 0 0 1
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.67 0.00 50.02 47.64 0.00 44.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area
Energy
Mobile
Total
1.4399 8.0000e0059.3500e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0201 0.0201 5.0000e0050.0214
3.5700e0030.0324
0.6249
0.6574
0.0273
6.3302
6.3668
1.9000e0042.4700e0032.4700e0032.4700e0032.4700e00338.9251 38.9251 7.5000e0047.1000e00439.1564
0.5929 0.0144 1.5058 0.0101 1.5159 0.4011 9.3800e0030.4105 1,464.904 1,464.904 0.0924 0.0572 1,484.246 7 7 1
2.0364 0.0146 1.5058 0.0126 1.5184 0.4011 0.0119 0.4130 1,503.849 1,503.849 0.0932 0.0579 1,523.423 8 8 8
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area
Energy
Mobile
Total
1.4399 8.0000e0059.3500e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0201 0.0201 5.0000e0050.0214
3.5700e0030.0324
0.6249
0.6574
0.0273
6.3302
6.3668
1.9000e0042.4700e0032.4700e0032.4700e0032.4700e00338.9251 38.9251 7.5000e0047.1000e00439.1564
0.5929 0.0144 1.5058 0.0101 1.5159 0.4011 9.3800e0030.4105 1,464.904 1,464.904 0.0924 0.0572 1,484.246 7 7 1
2.0364 0.0146 1.5058 0.0126 1.5184 0.4011 0.0119 0.4130 1,503.849 1,503.849 0.0932 0.0579 1,523.423 8 8 8
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG
0.00 NOx
0.00 CO SO2
0.00 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4
0.00 N20
0.00 CO2e
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Week
Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2023
1/21/2023
2/1/2023
3/1/2023
8/1/2023
9/1/2023
9/1/2023
10/1/2023
1/20/2023
1/31/2023
2/28/2023
7/31/2023
8/31/2023
9/30/2023
9/15/2023
11/1/2023
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
15 2 7
3 4
5 6
7 8
Site Preparation
Grading
Site Preparation
Grading 20
109
23 21
11 23
Building Construction Building Construction
Utility Trenching and Installation Trenching
Landscaping Site Preparation
Paving Paving
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10
Acres of Paving: 0.75
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 95,625; Non-Residential Outdoor: 31,875; Striped Parking Area: 1,966 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Excavators
Amount Usage Hours
8.00 Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition 1 0.37
1 1
97 Site Preparation 97
Grading
8.00 8.00
0.37 158 Page 1320 – 1497 0.38
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Grading Graders 1
1 1
4 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 187
402
97 9
0.41 0.38
0.37 0.56
0.29 0.20
0.37 0.37
0.56 0.43
0.38 0.37
0.31 Grading Off-Highway Trucks
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Cement and Mortar Mixers
Cranes
Grading
Building Construction
Building Construction
Building Construction
Utility Trenching and Installation
Landscaping
Paving
231
89 97
97 9
Forklifts
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Cement and Mortar Mixers
Plate Compactors
Rollers
Paving 8
Paving 80
97 63
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Architectural Coating Aerial Lifts
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip
Number Number Length
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Hauling
Length Length
Demolition 1
1 4
7 1
1 4
1 3.00 0.00 512.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
Site Preparation
Grading
3.00 10.00
47.00 3.00
0.00 0.00
18.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
335.00
0.00 14.70
14.70 14.70
14.70 14.70
14.70 14.70
6.90 6.90
6.90 6.90
6.90 6.90
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
20.00 LD_Mix
Building Construction
Utility Trenching and
Landscaping
0.00 3.00 0.00
Paving 10.00
9.00 0.00
Architectural Coating 0.00
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area Page 1321 – 1497
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
7.3827 0.0000
0.0758
0.0758
7.3827
0.0758
7.4585
1.1178 0.0000
0.0698
0.0698
1.1178
0.0698
1.1876
0.0000
301.5765 301.5765
301.5765 301.5765
0.0000
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e0030.0975 304.0149
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e- 304.0149
003
7.3827 1.1178 0.0975
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0740
0.0000
4.4541
0.0000
1.1888
0.0000
0.1084
1.2972
0.0200
0.0000
0.5975
0.0000
0.0335
0.6310
0.0281
0.0000
0.6256
0.0000
0.0337
0.6593
0.1638
0.0000
0.0269
0.0000
0.1907
0.0000
2,193.613 2,193.613 0.1209
0.0000
0.3483
0.0000
2,300.441
2 2 6
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
9.6000e0036.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e00330.0023 30.0023 7.6000e0046.9000e00430.2275
0.0836 4.4607 0.0203 0.0283 0.1727 0.0271 0.1998 2,223.615 2,223.615 0.1217 0.3490 2,330.669 4 4 1
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
3.3222 0.0000
0.0758
0.0758
3.3222
0.0758
3.3980
0.5030 0.0000
0.0698
0.0698
0.5030
0.0698
0.5728
0.0000
301.5765 301.5765
301.5765 301.5765
0.0000
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e0030.0000 0.0975 304.0149
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e- 304.0149
003
3.3222 0.5030 0.0000 0.0975
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0740
0.0000
4.4541
0.0000
1.1888
0.0000
0.1084
1.2972
0.0200
0.0000
0.5975
0.0000
0.0335
0.6310
0.0281
0.0000
0.6256
0.0000
0.0337
0.6593
0.1638
0.0000
0.0269
0.0000
0.1907
0.0000
2,193.613 2,193.613 0.1209
0.0000
0.3483
0.0000
2,300.441
2 2 6
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
9.6000e0036.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e00330.0023 30.0023 7.6000e0046.9000e00430.2275
0.0836 4.4607 0.0203 0.0283 0.1727 0.0271 0.1998 2,223.615 2,223.615 0.1217 0.3490 2,330.669 4 4 1
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.0000 0.0000
0.0758
0.0758
0.0000
0.0758
0.0758
0.0000 0.0000
0.0698
0.0698
0.0000
0.0698
0.0698
0.0000
301.5765 301.5765
301.5765 301.5765
0.0000
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e0030.0975 304.0149
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e- 304.0149
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0975
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1084
0.1084
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0335
0.0335
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0337
0.0337
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
9.6000e0036.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e00330.0023
30.0023
30.0023
30.0023
7.6000e0046.9000e00430.2275
9.6000e- 30.2275
003
6.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e0037.6000e0046.9000e004 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.0000 0.0000
0.0758
0.0758
0.0000
0.0758
0.0758
0.0000 0.0000
0.0698
0.0698
0.0000
0.0698
0.0698
0.0000
301.5765 301.5765
301.5765 301.5765
0.0000
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e0030.0000 0.0975 304.0149
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e- 304.0149
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0975
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1084
0.1084
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0335
0.0335
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0337
0.0337
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
9.6000e0036.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e00330.0023
30.0023
30.0023
30.0023
7.6000e0046.9000e00430.2275
9.6000e- 30.2275
003
6.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e0037.6000e0046.9000e004
3.4 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.5454 0.0000
0.4314
0.4314
0.5454
0.4314
0.9768
0.0596 0.0000
0.3969
0.3969
0.0596
0.3969
0.4564
0.0000 0.0000
1.2274 11.3052 10.4702 0.0281 2,722.425 2,722.425 0.8805 2,744.438 8 8 0
1.2274 11.3052 10.4702 0.0281 0.5454 0.0596 2,722.425 2,722.425 0.8805 2,744.438 8 8 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0363
0.0000
0.0320
0.0683
2.1857
0.0000
0.0223
2.2080
0.5834
0.0000
0.3614
0.9448
9.8000e0030.2932
0.0000
0.1118
0.4050
0.0138
0.0000
0.3070
0.0000
0.1125
0.4194
0.0804
0.0000
0.0296
0.1100
0.0132
0.0000
0.0936
0.0000
0.0303
0.1238
1,076.455 1,076.455 0.0593
0.0000
0.1709
0.0000
1,128.878
7 7 8
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
9.9000e0046.7000e0046.2000e004100.0075 100.0075 2.5200e0032.3100e- 100.7583 003
0.0108 0.0145 0.0138 1,176.463 1,176.463 0.0619 0.1733 1,229.637 2 2 1
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.2454 0.0000
0.4314
0.4314
0.2454
0.4314
0.6768
0.0268 0.0000
0.3969
0.3969
0.0268
0.3969
0.4237
0.0000 0.0000
1.2274 11.3052 10.4702 0.0281 0.0000 2,722.425 2,722.425 0.8805 2,744.438 8 8 0
1.2274 11.3052 10.4702 0.0281 0.2454 0.0268 0.0000 2,722.425 2,722.425 0.8805 2,744.438 8 8 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Grading - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0363
0.0000
0.0320
0.0683
2.1857
0.0000
0.0223
2.2080
0.5834
0.0000
0.3614
0.9448
9.8000e0030.2932
0.0000
0.1118
0.4050
0.0138
0.0000
0.3070
0.0000
0.1125
0.4194
0.0804
0.0000
0.0296
0.1100
0.0132
0.0000
0.0936
0.0000
0.0303
0.1238
1,076.455 1,076.455 0.0593
0.0000
0.1709
0.0000
1,128.878
7 7 8
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
9.9000e0046.7000e0046.2000e004100.0075 100.0075 2.5200e0032.3100e- 100.7583 003
0.0108 0.0145 0.0138 1,176.463 1,176.463 0.0619 0.1733 1,229.637 2 2 1
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.7915 7.2076 5.3575 0.0117 0.3352 0.3352 0.3130 0.3130 1,056.946 1,056.946 0.2975 1,064.382 2 2 8
Total 0.7915 7.2076 5.3575 0.0117 0.3352 0.3352 0.3130 0.3130 1,056.946 1,056.946 0.2975 1,064.382 2 2 8
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0207
0.1504
0.1711
0.0000
0.6909
0.1049
0.7958
0.0000
0.2677
1.6986
1.9662
0.0000 0.0000
0.1153
0.5254
0.6407
0.0000 0.0000
0.1188
0.5285
0.6473
0.0000
0.0332
0.1393
0.1725
0.0000 0.0000
0.0365
0.1422
0.1788
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0121
0.0119
0.0239
0.0000
0.0518
0.0109
0.0627
0.0000
3.3500e0033.4700e0033.3200e003360.5085 360.5085
470.0354 470.0354
830.5439 830.5439
376.2560
473.5642
849.8202
4.6500e0033.1600e0032.9100e003
8.0000e0036.6300e0036.2300e003
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.7915 7.2076 5.3575 0.0117 0.3352 0.3352 0.3130 0.3130 0.0000 1,056.946 1,056.946 0.2975 1,064.382 2 2 8
Total 0.7915 7.2076 5.3575 0.0117 0.3352 0.3352 0.3130 0.3130 0.0000 1,056.946 1,056.946 0.2975 1,064.382 2 2 8
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0207
0.1504
0.1711
0.0000
0.6909
0.1049
0.7958
0.0000
0.2677
1.6986
1.9662
0.0000 0.0000
0.1153
0.5254
0.6407
0.0000 0.0000
0.1188
0.5285
0.6473
0.0000
0.0332
0.1393
0.1725
0.0000 0.0000
0.0365
0.1422
0.1788
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0121
0.0119
0.0239
0.0000
0.0518
0.0109
0.0627
0.0000
3.3500e0033.4700e0033.3200e003360.5085 360.5085
470.0354 470.0354
830.5439 830.5439
376.2560
473.5642
849.8202
4.6500e0033.1600e0032.9100e003
8.0000e0036.6300e0036.2300e003
3.6 Utility Trenching and Installation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e0030.0758 0.0758 0.0698 0.0698 301.5765 301.5765 0.0975 304.0149 Total 0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e0030.0758 0.0758 0.0698 0.0698 301.5765 301.5765 0.0975 304.0149
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Utility Trenching and Installation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1084
0.1084
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0335
0.0335
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0337
0.0337
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
9.6000e0036.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e00330.0023
30.0023
30.0023
30.0023
7.6000e0046.9000e00430.2275
9.6000e- 30.2275
003
6.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e0037.6000e0046.9000e004 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e0030.0758 0.0758 0.0698 0.0698 0.0000 301.5765 301.5765 0.0975 304.0149 Total 0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e0030.0758 0.0758 0.0698 0.0698 0.0000 301.5765 301.5765 0.0975 304.0149
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Utility Trenching and Installation - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1084
0.1084
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0335
0.0335
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0337
0.0337
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
9.6000e0036.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e00330.0023
30.0023
30.0023
30.0023
7.6000e0046.9000e00430.2275
9.6000e- 30.2275
003
6.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e0037.6000e0046.9000e004
3.7 Landscaping - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.0000 0.0000
0.0758
0.0758
0.0000
0.0758
0.0758
0.0000 0.0000
0.0698
0.0698
0.0000
0.0698
0.0698
0.0000
301.5765 301.5765
301.5765 301.5765
0.0000
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e0030.0975 304.0149
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e- 304.0149
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0975
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.7 Landscaping - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1084
0.1084
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0335
0.0335
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0337
0.0337
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
9.6000e0036.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e00330.0023
30.0023
30.0023
30.0023
7.6000e0046.9000e00430.2275
9.6000e- 30.2275
003
6.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e0037.6000e0046.9000e004 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
0.0000 0.0000
0.0758
0.0758
0.0000
0.0758
0.0758
0.0000 0.0000
0.0698
0.0698
0.0000
0.0698
0.0698
0.0000
301.5765 301.5765
301.5765 301.5765
0.0000
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e0030.0000 0.0975 304.0149
0.1514 1.5357 2.2313 3.1200e- 304.0149
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0975
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.7 Landscaping - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1084
0.1084
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0335
0.0335
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0337
0.0337
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
9.6000e0036.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e00330.0023
30.0023
30.0023
30.0023
7.6000e0046.9000e00430.2275
9.6000e- 30.2275
003
6.6900e0033.0000e0042.0000e0048.8900e0031.9000e0049.0800e0037.6000e0046.9000e004
3.8 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road
Paving
Total
0.4039
0.1786
0.5826
3.7653 4.6024 6.9400e0030.1885
0.0000
0.1885
0.1885
0.0000
0.1885
0.1753
0.0000
0.1753
0.1753
0.0000
0.1753
640.6799 640.6799
0.0000
0.1885 645.3935
0.0000
3.7653 4.6024 6.9400e003640.6799 640.6799 0.1885 645.3935
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.8 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0320
0.0320
0.0000
0.0000
0.0223
0.0223
0.0000
0.0000
0.3614
0.3614
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1118
0.1118
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1125
0.1125
0.0000
0.0000
0.0296
0.0296
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0303
0.0303
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
9.9000e0046.7000e0046.2000e004100.0075 100.0075 2.5200e0032.3100e- 100.7583 003
9.9000e0046.7000e0046.2000e004100.0075 100.0075 2.5200e0032.3100e- 100.7583 003
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road
Paving
Total
0.4039
0.1786
0.5826
3.7653 4.6024 6.9400e0030.1885
0.0000
0.1885
0.1885
0.0000
0.1885
0.1753
0.0000
0.1753
0.1753
0.0000
0.1753
0.0000 640.6799 640.6799 0.1885 645.3935
0.0000 0.0000
3.7653 4.6024 6.9400e0030.0000 640.6799 640.6799 0.1885 645.3935
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.8 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0320
0.0320
0.0000
0.0000
0.0223
0.0223
0.0000
0.0000
0.3614
0.3614
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1118
0.1118
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1125
0.1125
0.0000
0.0000
0.0296
0.0296
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0303
0.0303
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
9.9000e0046.7000e0046.2000e004100.0075 100.0075 2.5200e0032.3100e- 100.7583 003
9.9000e0046.7000e0046.2000e004100.0075 100.0075 2.5200e0032.3100e- 100.7583 003
3.9 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating
Off-Road
Total
26.0902
0.0346
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.5332 1.0920 1.6800e0039.2100e0039.2100e0038.4700e0038.4700e003162.6199 162.6199 0.0526 163.9347
26.1248 0.5332 1.0920 1.6800e- 163.9347
003
9.2100e0039.2100e0038.4700e0038.4700e003162.6199 162.6199 0.0526
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.9 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0288
0.0288
0.0000
0.0000
0.0201
0.0201
0.0000
0.0000
0.3253
0.3253
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1006
0.1006
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1012
0.1012
0.0000
0.0000
0.0267
0.0267
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0272
0.0272
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
8.9000e0046.1000e0045.6000e00490.0068
90.0068
90.0068
90.0068
2.2700e0032.0800e00390.6825
8.9000e- 90.6825
004
6.1000e0045.6000e0042.2700e0032.0800e003
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating
Off-Road
Total
26.0902
0.0346
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
162.6199 162.6199
162.6199 162.6199
0.0000
0.5332 1.0920 1.6800e0039.2100e0039.2100e0038.4700e0038.4700e0030.0000 0.0526 163.9347
26.1248 0.5332 1.0920 1.6800e- 163.9347
003
9.2100e0039.2100e0038.4700e0038.4700e0030.0000 0.0526
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.9 Architectural Coating - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0288
0.0288
0.0000
0.0000
0.0201
0.0201
0.0000
0.0000
0.3253
0.3253
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1006
0.1006
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1012
0.1012
0.0000
0.0000
0.0267
0.0267
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0272
0.0272
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
8.9000e0046.1000e0045.6000e00490.0068
90.0068
90.0068
90.0068
2.2700e0032.0800e00390.6825
8.9000e- 90.6825
004
6.1000e0045.6000e0042.2700e0032.0800e003
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.5929
0.5929
0.6249
0.6249
6.3302
6.3302
0.0144
0.0144
1.5058
1.5058
0.0101
0.0101
1.5159
1.5159
0.4011
0.4011
9.3800e0030.4105
0.4105
1,464.904 1,464.904 0.0924
0.0924
0.0572
0.0572
1,484.246
7 7 1
Unmitigated 9.3800e0031,464.904 1,464.904 1,484.246
7 7 1
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park
General Office Building
Other Asphalt Surfaces
Parking Lot
0.28 58.44
0.00 0.71
13.26 0.00
0.79 4.20
1,191 1,191
142,508 142,508
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
Total
122.43
181.15
122.43
136.40
122.43
127.42
524,700
668,400
524,700
668,400
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use
City Park
H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
16.60 16.60
16.60 16.60
16.60 8.40
8.40 8.40
8.40 8.40
6.90 6.90
6.90 6.90
6.90 33.00
33.00 0.00
48.00 48.00
0.00 19.00
19.00 0.00
66 77
0 28
19 0
6 4
0 0
3 General Office Building
Other Asphalt Surfaces
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0
Refrigerated Warehouse-No 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5
4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Land Use
City Park
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352 General Office Building
Other Asphalt Surfaces
Parking Lot
0.542464
0.542464
0.542464
0.542464
0.063735
0.063735
0.063735
0.063735
0.188241
0.188241
0.188241
0.188241
0.126899
0.126899
0.126899
0.126899
0.023249
0.023249
0.023249
0.023249
0.006239
0.006239
0.006239
0.006239
0.010717
0.010717
0.010717
0.010717
0.008079
0.008079
0.008079
0.008079
0.000923
0.000923
0.000923
0.000923
0.000604
0.000604
0.000604
0.000604
0.024795
0.024795
0.024795
0.024795
0.000702
0.000702
0.000702
0.000702
0.003352
0.003352
0.003352
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.003352
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
3.5700e0030.0324
0.0324
0.0273
0.0273
1.9000e0042.4700e0032.4700e0032.4700e0032.4700e00338.9251
38.9251
38.9251
38.9251
7.5000e0047.1000e00439.1564
NaturalGas 39.1564
Unmitigated
3.5700e0031.9000e0042.4700e0032.4700e0032.4700e0032.4700e0037.5000e0047.1000e004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use
City Park
kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
0 0.0000 0.0000
0.0166
0.0000
0.0000
0.0158
0.0000
0.0140
0.0000
0.0000
0.0133
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
19.9388
0.0000
0.0000
18.9863
0.0000
19.9388
0.0000
0.0000
18.9863
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
20.0573
0.0000
0.0000
19.0991
General Office
Building
169.479 1.8300e0031.0000e0041.2600e0031.2600e0031.2600e0031.2600e0033.8000e0043.7000e004 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
161.384 1.7400e0039.0000e0051.2000e0031.2000e0031.2000e0031.2000e0033.6000e0043.5000e004 Total 3.5700e0030.0324 0.0273 1.9000e0042.4600e0032.4600e0032.4600e0032.4600e00338.9251 38.9251 7.4000e0047.2000e00439.1564
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use
City Park
kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
0 0.0000 0.0000
0.0166
0.0000
0.0000
0.0158
0.0000
0.0140
0.0000
0.0000
0.0133
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
19.9388
0.0000
0.0000
18.9863
0.0000
19.9388
0.0000
0.0000
18.9863
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
20.0573
0.0000
0.0000
19.0991
General Office
Building
0.169479 1.8300e0031.0000e0041.2600e0031.2600e0031.2600e0031.2600e0033.8000e0043.7000e004 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0.161384 1.7400e0039.0000e0051.2000e0031.2000e0031.2000e0031.2000e0033.6000e0043.5000e004 Total 3.5700e0030.0324 0.0273 1.9000e0042.4600e0032.4600e0032.4600e0032.4600e00338.9251 38.9251 7.4000e0047.2000e00439.1564
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.4399
1.4399
8.0000e0059.3500e0030.0000
0.0000
3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0201
0.0201
0.0201
0.0201
5.0000e0050.0214
Unmitigated 8.0000e- 0.0214
005
9.3500e0033.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0055.0000e005
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.1644
1.2747
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0201
0.0201
0.0000
0.0000
0.0214
0.0214
Consumer
Products
Landscaping 8.6000e0048.0000e0059.3500e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0201 5.0000e005 Total 1.4399 8.0000e0059.3500e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0201 5.0000e005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 31 Date: 9/19/2024 10:33 AM 7091/ Allen Warehouse Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.1644
1.2747
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0201
0.0201
0.0000
0.0000
0.0214
0.0214
Consumer
Products
Landscaping 8.6000e0048.0000e0059.3500e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0201 5.0000e005 Total 1.4399 8.0000e0059.3500e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0201 5.0000e005
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water