Agenda packet, first session — San Dimas City Council, June 10, 2025 (part 3 of 4)

Ordinance 1324 Page 64
Amend The City Of San Dimas Municipal Code Title 18 As Necessary To Eliminate The Development Plan Review Board.

Grading of the site shall conform to the standards set forth in this section. Construction grading shall not be issued unless the grading plans have first been reviewed and approved by the director of community development planning and city engineer, according to the terms of the applicable city approvals.
…
C. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a tree removal plan for review and approval pursuant to Chapter 18.162 of this title.by the development plan review board.

Trees six inches in diameter or larger to be removed shall be identified on the tree removal plan.

SECTION 231. Section 18.542.260. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.542.260. Setbacks.

A. Setbacks for Planning Area One shall be as follows:

1. Front Yard Setbacks. Front yard setbacks shall be a minimum of twenty feet but a lesser minimum setback may be reviewed and approved by director of community development or designee development plan review board if warranted by topographic conditions or to otherwise comply with the intent of standards set forth in this specific plan.

2. Side Yard Setbacks. Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of twenty-five feet combined but a lesser minimum setback may be reviewed and approved by the director of community development or designee development plan review board if warranted by topographic conditions or to otherwise comply with the intent of standards set forth in this specific plan.

3. Setbacks for Accessory Structures. Setbacks for accessory structures shall be as established by the director of community development or designee development plan review board, but no less than twenty feet to the side or rear yard property line but a lesser minimum setback may be reviewed and approved by the director of community development development plan review board if warranted by topographic conditions or to otherwise comply with the intent of standards set forth in this specific plan.

B. Setbacks for Planning Area Two shall be as follows:

1. Front Yard Setbacks. Front yard setbacks shall be a minimum of fifty feet but a lesser minimum setback may be reviewed and approved by director of community development or designee development plan review board if warranted by topographic conditions or to otherwise comply with the intent of standards set forth in this specific plan.

2. Side Yard Setbacks. Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of forty feet but a lesser minimum setback may be reviewed and approved by the director of community development or designee development plan review board if warranted by topographic conditions or to otherwise comply with the intent of standards set forth in this specific plan.

3. Setbacks for Accessory Structures. Setbacks for accessory structures shall be as established by the director of community development or designee development plan review board, but no less than forty feet to the side or rear yard property line but a lesser minimum setback may be reviewed and approved by the director of community development or designee development plan review board if warranted by topographic conditions or to otherwise comply with the intent of standards set forth in this specific plan.

SECTION 232. Section 18.542.370. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.542.370. Fencing.

A conceptual fencing plan shall be submitted which indicates the general areas where fences are permitted. The purpose of this plan is to prohibit the arbitrary placement of fences on the visible slopes of the hillside areas. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, a fencing plan shall be submitted to the planning division development plan review board for review and approval. The fencing plan shall clearly indicate the location, height, and type of materials and color selection to be utilized for fencing. Areas prohibited from fencing shall be indicated on the plan.

SECTION 233. Section 18.542.500. is hereby amended to read as follows:

Page 444 ends

Ordinance 1324 Page 65
Amend The City Of San Dimas Municipal Code Title 18 As Necessary To Eliminate The Development Plan Review Board.

18.542.500. Purpose.

A. The purpose of the architectural guidelines is threefold:
…
C. To provide guidance to the review authority pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title planning commission, the development plan review board and the city council in the subsequent review of building plans as noted in the plan review and plan disposition procedures.

SECTION 234. Section 18.542.600. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.542.600. Review requirements – Precise plans.

A. Before any grading or construction is undertaken on any lot or parcel within the Specific Plan No. 25 area, development plans shall be reviewed and approved pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title. Before any grading for residential development is undertaken on any lot or parcel within the Specific Plan No. 25 area, a precise plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the development plan review board, planning commission and city council.

B. Unless otherwise provided in accordance with Section 18.12.050, precise plans shall be subject to final review and approval by the development plan review board, the planning commission and the city council.

C. In addition to the standard development plan findings, the development plan review board, the planning commission and the city council, in approving a precise plan for any lot or lots in Specific Plan No. 25, shall make the following findings:

1. The proposed improvements will maintain or enhance the existing character and purpose of Specific Plan No. 25, as set forth in Section 18.542.010(D);

2. Structures and appurtenances are sited in a manner that minimizes visual impact and disturbance to the natural terrain and are in conformance with the intent of Specific Plan No. 25;

3. The architectural character, style and use of materials harmonize with the natural setting, if applicable.

D. Prior to submitting development plans, the applicant shall meet with planning staff members to discuss and review the general purpose and objectives of the specific plan in relation to any development concepts proposed by the applicant.
§ 18.542.610Review requirements—Land divisions.

Before any division of land is undertaken on any lot or parcel within the Specific Plan No. 25 area, a tentative parcel or tract map, pursuant to Title 17 and the State Subdivision Map Act, shall be submitted for review and approval by the development plan review board, planning commission and city council. The following additional requirements shall apply.

A. Three-dimensional model;
B. Viewshed analysis;
C. Identification of building pad locations for all proposed development, including type of foundation construction and three-dimensional building envelope. § 18.542.620Precise plan review requirements.

A. The applicant shall submit a minimum of four sets of scaled plans to the planning department which shall include the following, where applicable:

1. Precise grading plan and site plan;

2. Architectural floor plans and elevations;

3. Grading plan;

4. Lighting plan;

5. Conceptual landscaping plan;

6. Fencing plan;

7. Access and circulation plan;

8. Utility plan;

9. Viewshed analysis;

Page 445 ends

Ordinance 1324 Page 66
Amend The City Of San Dimas Municipal Code Title 18 As Necessary To Eliminate The Development Plan Review Board.

10. Three-dimensional model.

B. Precise plans shall be reviewed and approved as set forth in Section 18.542.630.

C. The approving authority shall make the findings in accordance with Section 18.12.060. § 18.542.630Plan disposition.

A. The development plan review board shall consider the plans and shall recommend to the planning commission approval, conditional approval or disapproval of the plans with any conditions deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare.

B. The planning commission shall consider the plans and recommend to the city council approval, conditional approval or disapproval of the plans with any conditions deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare.

C. Upon receipt of the recommendation from the planning commission, the city council shall approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the precise plan.

D. Amendments to Approved Plans. Development plans and precise plans may be amended by the same process provided for approval. Minor modifications, which do not substantially change the concept of an approved development plan or precise plan may be approved by the director of planning and reported to the development plan review board.

SECTION 235. Chapter 18.544 Article VII Plan Review and Disposition is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.544.800 Review Requirements – Development plans.

18.544.810 Precise Plan review

18. 544.820 Plan disposition.

18.544.8310. Minor modifications.

SECTION 236. Section 18.544.040. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.544.040. General notes.

The project area of Specific Plan No. 26 is designated as commercial by the city general plan (proposed amendment to mixed use) “as a Specific Plan Area for commercial and/or residential development.” All development, uses and activity shall be subject to, but not limited to, the following general provisions:
…
G. Any permitted use or conditionally permitted use not specifically provided by the San Dimas Specific Plan No. 26 shall not be permitted without a determination of use by the Community Development Department development plan review board pursuant to provisions of Chapter 18.12 of this title; and
SECTION 237. Section 18.544.110. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.544.110. Permitted uses.

Uses permitted in Area I shall include those businesses listed in this section which operate in compliance with the intent and standards of this specific plan area. Each business shall be evaluated in terms of its operational characteristics and specific site location. …
E. Other uses. Other similar permitted and conditional uses determined by the director of community development services to be similar and not more obnoxious or detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, in accordance with the findings as set forth in Section 18.192.040 of this title. The determination of the director may be appealed to the planning commission development plan review board and, thereafter, the city council in accordance with Chapter 18.212 of this title.

SECTION 238. Section 18.544.240. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.544.240. Signage.

Page 446 ends

Ordinance 1324 Page 67
Amend The City Of San Dimas Municipal Code Title 18 As Necessary To Eliminate The Development Plan Review Board.

The provisions of Chapter 18.152 of this title shall apply. No signs shall be installed until a master sign program for the project has been approved by the review authority pursuant to Chapter

18.12 of this title. development plan review board.

SECTION 239. Section 18.544.250. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.544.250. Architecture.

A. Theme. Due to the highly visible location of this site, a common architectural theme is encouraged to provide a high quality product. Structures shall be approved by the review authority pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title development plan review board. The use of wood and/or stucco is preferred for the exterior.

SECTION 240. Section 18.544.710. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.544.710. Entry treatments.

All driveway entrances shall incorporate decorative pavement treatment. Additional entry treatment may be required by the review authority pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title development plan review board.

SECTION 241. Section 18.544.770. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.544.770. Walls.

Walls shall be permitted and/or required pursuant to the following provisions. All walls shall be constructed of decorative concrete tilt-up, masonry or other approved durable material.

A. Required Walls. Walls shall be required to screen truck and storage areas where allowed by this chapter. Interior walls may be required by the review authority pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title development plan review board as a component of the design review process. All screening walls shall be architecturally compatible with the buildings within the project and planning units, and shall incorporate vertical landscaping such as vines, trees and shrubbery. The vertical landscaping elements shall be located on the public right-of-way side to provide visual relief from the horizontal expanse. The height of the screening walls shall be governed by the view shed from the surrounding areas which shall take into consideration the height of equipment and/ or trucks to be stored behind the walls.

SECTION 242. Section 18.544.800. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.544.800. Review requirements – Development plans.

A. Before any grading or construction is undertaken on any lot or parcel within the Specific Plan No. 26 area, development plans shall be reviewed and approved pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title. Before any grading is undertaken on any lot or parcel within the Specific Plan No. 26 area, a precise plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the development plan review board, planning commission and city council.

B. Unless otherwise provided in accordance with Section 18.12.050 of this title, precise plans shall be subject to final review and approval by the development plan review board, the planning commission and the city council.

1. The proposed improvements will maintain or enhance the existing character and purpose of Specific Plan No. 26, as set forth in Section 18.542.010 of this title;

2. The architectural character, style and use of materials harmonize with the natural setting, if applicable.

Page 447 ends

Ordinance 1324 Page 68
Amend The City Of San Dimas Municipal Code Title 18 As Necessary To Eliminate The Development Plan Review Board.

SECTION 243. Section 18.544.810 shall be deleted in its entirety:
§ 18.544.810 Precise plan review.

A. The applicant shall submit a minimum of four sets of scaled plans to the planning department which shall include the following, where applicable:

1. Precise grading plan and site plan;

2. Architectural floor plans and elevations;

3. Grading plan;

4. Lighting plan;

5. Conceptual landscaping plan;

6. Fencing plan;

7. Access and circulation plan;

8. Utility plan;

9. Master sign program.

B. Precise plans shall be reviewed and approved as set forth in Section 18.542.800 of this title.

C. The approving authority shall make the findings in accordance with Section 18.12.060 of this title.

SECTION 244. Section 18.544.820 shall be deleted in its entirety:
§ 18.544.820 Plan disposition.

C. Upon receipt of the recommendation from the planning commission, the city council shall approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the precise plan.

D. Amendments to Approved Plans. Development plans and precise plans may be amended by the same process provided for approval. Minor modifications, which do not substantially change the concept of an approved development plan or precise plan may be approved by the director of development services and reported to the development plan review board.

SECTION 245. Section 18.544.830. is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.544.8310. Minor modifications.

The director of community development services without public hearing may grant minor modifications to the provisions of this specific plan limited to the following:
…
SECTION 246. Section 2.36.010. is hereby amended to read as follows:

2.36.010 Fees- Generally- Renewal
…
A. Unless otherwise stated in this chapter or Chapter 5.28, 5.32 or 5.68, the fee for filing an application for a permit pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 5.28, 5.32 or 5.68, shall be as required by the Fee Schedule Resolution approved by the City Council fifteen dollars, payable in advance. The license fee prescribed in Chapters 5.04, 5.12, 5.16, 5.20, 5.24 and 5.68 for the particular business and the permit fee shall accompany the application for the permit therefor under this chapter and Chapters 5.28, 5.36 and 5.68.

Permits for the following businesses or activities shall be renewed annually on or before the anniversary date of the issuance of such permit:

Page 448 ends

Ordinance 1324 Page 69
Amend The City Of San Dimas Municipal Code Title 18 As Necessary To Eliminate The Development Plan Review Board.

1. Auction establishments or auctioneer;

2. Bankrupt stock, bankrupt sales or close-out sales;

3. Billiard and pool halls;

4. Carnivals, circuses and rodeos;

5. Accessory game arcades;

6. Entertainment;

7. Pawnbrokers;

8. Secondhand dealers;

9. Solicitors, annual permit application fee, seventy-five dollars;

10. Fortunetelling;

11. Sightseeing recreational tours;

12. Sidewalk vendors.

Fee for each such renewal shall be fifteen dollars.

Page 449 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Scott Wasserman, Director of Parks & Recreation Subject: Summary of Maintenance Services Provided for Open Space Maintenance District No. 1(Tract No. 32818, Boulevard Development)
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
At its regular meeting on May 27, 2025, the City Council directed staff to provide the dates of maintenance services performed in Open Space Maintenance District No. 1 (Tract No. 32828, Boulevard Development) during Fiscal Year 2024-25 on the City Council meeting of June 10, 2025

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the report.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

At its regular meeting on May 27, 2025, the City Council approved an annual assessment of $12,235.62 ($643.98 per parcel) for the 19 households that comprise the Boulevard Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The annual assessment includes a CPI increase of 3.3%, or $20.57 per parcel. The assessment is paid by the 19 residences in the 1200-1400 blocks of Via Verde Ave. The current assessment fund has a prior fund balance of $2,868.71.

Funds collected through the Boulevard Assessment District are used to provide the following maintenance services:

Page 450 ends

Summary of maintenance services provided for Open Space Maintenance District No. 1(Tract No. 32818, Boulevard Development) Page 2
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
General Maintenance (020-000) $ 4,893.65
Electricity (022-001) $ 261.41
Water (022-004) $ 8,125.24
Sub-total Boulevard $13,226.30

BACKGROUND
The Boulevard Assessment District was created in 1977 after the development of single-family residences on Via Verde Ave. The purpose of the assessment was to maintain the city-owned property (slope) that was created during the construction of these houses and Paseo Alondra.

The landscaped slope separates Paseo Alondra from the rear of the properties of Paseo Dorado.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The assessment calls for quarterly maintenance of the slope that is performed by the City’s landscape maintenance contractor, which is currently Nieves Landscapes, Inc. Although the assessment maintenance requirement is quarterly, Nieves has been providing services five times per calendar year at no additional charge to the City. Services in the past two years were performed in February, May, July, September and November. The maintenance functions involved are pruning, weeding, trimming, trash removal and irrigation inspections. Irrigation repairs are performed by City staff.

The assessment district trees on the slope are maintained under contract by West Coast Arborists (WCA). The current tree inventory includes 20 new trees that were planted in 2022 using funding from a successful grant submitted by the City and WCA. These trees were planted at no cost to the City or assessment district and replaced 20 mature trees that were removed in 2020 for being potentially hazardous or in poor condition. These trees are in grid trim District A, which are scheduled for trimming in FY 26-27. Staff may also perform light pruning of trees as needed between more substantial grid pruning, which occurs every four years. Per the City Council’s request, maintenance records for the trees in the assessment district have been provided and demonstrate the City’s commitment to providing regular maintenance to the trees that are on the slope.

ALTERNATIVES
This item was agendized at the request of the City Council. The City Council could request additional information for review at a future City Council meeting.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,

Page 451 ends

Summary of maintenance services provided for Open Space Maintenance District No. 1(Tract No. 32818, Boulevard Development) Page 3
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
Scott Wasserman
Director of Parks & Recreation
Attachments:

1. Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2025-26

2. Maintenance Records for Tree Care 2012-2025

Page 452 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (TRACT NO. 32818, BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENT)

ENGINEER'S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of San Dimas, and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

SECTION 2 THE IMPROVEMENTS
The improvements consist of an irrigation system and landscaping within Lot 20 of Tract No. 32818, which was required to be installed by the developer and accepted for maintenance by the City. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance with the requirements of the conditions of approval of said Tract No. 32818, and City Standards. Reference is hereby made to the said plans and specifications for the exact location and nature of the landscape improvements. Said plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of thisreport, and are on file in the office of the City Engineer.

SECTION 3 DIAGRAM FOR THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
A copy of the assessment diagram is on file in the office of the City Engineer.

SECTION 4 ESTIMATE OF COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
The cost of the initial landscaping of Lot 20 of Tract No. 32818 was borne by the subdivider; therefore, all assessments relate to maintenance only.

Direct Maintenance Costs:

General Maintenance (by Contract)
Utilities - Electrical
Utilities - Water
$4,839.65
$261.41
$8,125.24
Tree Trimming $0.00
Irrigation Repairs or Upgrades $0.00
Total of DirectMaintenance Costs: $13,226.30
CURRENT ASSESSMENT:
2025-2026 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT:
$11,844.79 ($623.41/parcel)
$12,235.62 ($643.98/parcel)
2025-2026 Deficit <$990.65>
Prior Fund Balance
Ending Fund Balance
$2,868.71
$1,878.06
Note: The costs aforementioned are more than the Annual Assessment and there is a minimal deficit for FY 2025-26. The assessment is subject to an annual adjustment tied to the Consumer Price Index-U for the Los Angeles Area as of December of each succeeding year (the "CPI") with a maximum annual adjustment rate not to exceed 7%. Page 453 – 674
The change in the CPI from February 2024 to February 2025 was 3.3%. Therefore, the maximum authorized assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 is increased by 3.3% which equates to an annual assessment of $12,235.65 and yields an assessment of $643.98 per parcel. The annual increase per parcel is $20.57.

SECTION 5 ASSESSMENT
The following information regarding assessments to individual lots for the 2025-2026 Fiscal Year is contained herein and is to be levied on July 1, 2025. The net amount estimated to be assessed upon the assessable lands within the district is $12,235.62, which is apportioned to all assessable lots shown on the attached Assessment Roll.

The landscape district was developed for the benefit and enjoyment of all properties included within the assessment district boundaries, and all parcels benefit equally from the improvements.

Respectfully submitted,
Shari Garwick
Director of Public Works
Dave Gilbertson, P.E.

Deputy City Engineer

Page 454 ends

CITY OF SAN DIMAS ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
TRACT NO. 32818 - BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENT
2025-2026 TOTAL
2025-2026

ASSESSMENT
LOT NO. ASSESSOR'S

REFERENCE
2024-2025 ASSESSMENT

ADDRESS ASSESSMENT INCREASE
1204 Via Verde
1228 Via Verde
1236 Via Verde
1244 Via Verde
1252 Via Verde
1260 Via Verde
1306 Via Verde
1318 Via Verde
1322 Via Verde
1330 Via Verde
1338 Via Verde
1346 Via Verde
1354 Via Verde
1362 Via Verde
1219 Paseo Dorado
1203 Paseo Dorado
1220 Via Verde
1211 Paseo Dorado
1212 Via Verde
4 7
8448-021-027
8448-021-032
8448-021-033
8448-021-034
8448-021-035
8448-021-036
8448-021-037
8448-021-038
8448-021-039
8448-021-040
8448-021-041
8448-021-042
8448-021-043
8448-021-044
8448-021-046
8448-021-047
8448-021-048
8448-021-049
8448-021-050
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
623.41
11,844.79

20.57 20.57

20.57 643.98
643.98
8 643.98
9 20.57

20.57 20.57

20.57 643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
643.98
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
1 3
6 20.57

20.57 643.98
643.98
2 5
390.83 12,235.62

Page 455 ends

Page 456 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$17,220
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 7328830)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 12 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-10 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
31+ 0 45-60
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 457 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 7328832)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 12 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-110 Juglans spp.

WALNUT
13-18 0 30-45

Page 458 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 7328833)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 12 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-111 Juglans spp.

WALNUT
13-18 0 30-45

Page 459 ends

WALNUT
13-18 0 30-45

Page 460 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$6,080
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 6436910)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Front-1 Eucalyptus cladocalyx

SUGAR GUM
19-24 19 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/08/2010 Svc Rqst Pruning 13-24 DSH 14529 63492 $195.00

Page 461 ends

SUGAR GUM
07-12 12 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/08/2010 Svc Rqst Pruning 7-12 DSH 14529 63492 $98.00

Page 462 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 6436913)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Front-3 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/08/2010 Tree & Stump Removal 13-24 DSH (ALEPPO PINE valued at $6,080)
14529
63492
$475.00

Page 463 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660685)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-1 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2020 Tree removal (RED IRONBARK valued at $6,080) 58746 166819 $562.65 WCA 06/10/2015 Prune Backup - Crew 28040 106554 Hourly
WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 464 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 7343024)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-10 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/10/2020 Tree removal (RED IRONBARK valued at $17,220) 58746 166819 $918.60 WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly
WCA 07/22/2011 Prune Backup - Crew 19015 74176 Hourly

Page 465 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 12686447)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-100 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
13-18 16 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 46889 142577 Hourly

Page 466 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660693)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-11 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/10/2020 Tree removal (RED IRONBARK valued at $17,220) 58746 166819 $918.60 WCA 06/10/2015 Prune Backup - Crew 28040 106554 Hourly
WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 467 ends

WALNUT
07-12 11 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 07/22/2011 Prune Backup - Crew 19015 74176 Hourly

Page 468 ends

PRIVET
07-12 10 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 07/22/2011 Prune Backup - Crew 19015 74176 Hourly

Page 469 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect
Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
Leaf Sucking Insects
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments
Woolly aphids, mites, pine
pitch c
LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.0715899586144,-117.830903492868)(WCA InventoryID: 14867160) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-112 Pinus eldarica

AFGHAN PINE
0-6 5 01-15
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 10/24/2023 Structural Prune 67857 207706 $9.37
WCA 09/26/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 205884 $9.37
WCA 08/21/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 204537 $9.37
WCA 06/30/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 202306 $9.37
WCA 03/09/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 198087 $9.37
WCA 02/02/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 196937 $9.37
WCA 12/15/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 194588 $9.37
WCA 11/28/2022 Grid Pruning 69364 193961 $75.40
WCA 10/20/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 192323 $9.37
WCA 09/21/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 191391 $9.37
WCA 08/11/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 190159 $9.37
WCA 07/06/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 188789 $9.37
WCA 06/06/2022 15 Gallon Tree Planting (AFGHAN PINE) 67857 187794 $160.00

Page 470 ends

Maintenance
Small Tree Maintenance
Est. Value
$1,030
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.0715174731331,-117.831014469266)(WCA InventoryID: 14867161) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-113 Quercus agrifolia

COAST LIVE OAK
0-6 5 01-15
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 10/24/2023 Structural Prune 67857 207706 $9.37
WCA 09/26/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 205884 $9.37
WCA 08/21/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 204537 $9.37
WCA 06/30/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 202306 $9.37
WCA 03/09/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 198087 $9.37
WCA 02/02/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 196937 $9.37
WCA 12/15/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 194588 $9.37
WCA 11/28/2022 Grid Pruning 69364 193961 $75.40
WCA 10/20/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 192323 $9.37
WCA 09/21/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 191391 $9.37
WCA 08/11/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 190159 $9.37
WCA 07/06/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 188789 $9.37
WCA 06/06/2022 15 Gallon Tree Planting (COAST LIVE OAK) 67857 187794 $160.00

Page 471 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect
Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments
Aphids, mites, pine pitch
cankers
LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07145470787699,-117.83110734075308)(WCA InventoryID: 14867162) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-114 Pinus eldarica

Page 472 ends

Maintenance
Small Tree Maintenance
Est. Value
$1,030
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07141443810852,-117.83120155334473)(WCA InventoryID: 14867163) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-115 Quercus agrifolia

Page 473 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
Leaf Sucking Insects
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07137222426172,-117.83124681562187)(WCA InventoryID: 14867164) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-116 Pinus eldarica

Page 474 ends

Maintenance
Small Tree Maintenance
Est. Value
$1,030
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07128890739708,-117.83138260245323)(WCA InventoryID: 14867165) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-117 Quercus agrifolia

Page 475 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments
Aphids, mites
LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07125613607451,-117.83133264631034)(WCA InventoryID: 14867166) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-118 Pinus eldarica

Page 476 ends

Maintenance
Young Tree Maintenance
Est. Value
$1,030
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.0710161829537,-117.832050472498)(WCA InventoryID: 14867167) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-119 Quercus agrifolia

COAST LIVE OAK
0-6 5 01-15
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 10/24/2023 Structural Prune 67857 207706 $9.37
WCA 09/26/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 205884 $9.37
WCA 08/21/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 204537 $9.37
WCA 06/30/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 202306 $9.37
WCA 06/16/2023 Tree & Stump Removal 13-24 DSH (COAST LIVE OAK valued at $4,890)
77226
201844
$617.60
WCA 03/09/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 198087 $9.37
WCA 02/02/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 196937 $9.37
WCA 12/15/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 194588 $9.37
WCA 11/28/2022 Grid Pruning 69364 193961 $75.40
WCA 10/20/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 192323 $9.37
WCA 10/18/2022 No Charge Watering 67857 192323 Hourly
WCA 09/21/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 191391 $9.37
WCA 08/11/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 190159 $9.37
WCA 07/06/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 188789 $9.37
WCA 06/06/2022 15 Gallon Tree Planting (COAST LIVE OAK) 67857 187794 $160.00

Page 477 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660694)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-12 Vacant site

Page 478 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
Leaf Sucking Insects
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07122725286449,-117.83152911812067)(WCA InventoryID: 14867168) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-120 Pinus eldarica

Page 479 ends

Maintenance
Young Tree Maintenance
Est. Value
$1,030
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.070883153095,-117.832403182983)(WCA InventoryID: 14867169) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-121 Quercus agrifolia

Page 480 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments
aphids, mites
LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.0712053127272,-117.83158175647259)(WCA InventoryID: 14867170) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-122 Pinus eldarica

Page 481 ends

Maintenance
Small Tree Maintenance
Est. Value
$1,030
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07080011347402,-117.83257484436035)(WCA InventoryID: 14867171) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-123 Quercus agrifolia

Page 482 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments
Aphids and mites
LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.0709786902172,-117.832136973739)(WCA InventoryID: 14867172) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-124 Pinus eldarica

Page 483 ends

Maintenance
Small Tree Maintenance
Est. Value
$1,030
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07077456280503,-117.83255003392696)(WCA InventoryID: 14867173) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-125 Quercus agrifolia

Page 484 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
Leaf Sucking Insects
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07082760820705,-117.83254131674767)(WCA InventoryID: 14867174) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-126 Pinus eldarica

Page 485 ends

Maintenance
Small Tree Maintenance
Est. Value
$1,030
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.0707354036126,-117.832757905126)(WCA InventoryID: 14867175) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-127 Quercus agrifolia

Page 486 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
N/A
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
N/A
Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.0707517893762,-117.832741141319)(WCA InventoryID: 14867176) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-128 Pinus eldarica

AFGHAN PINE
0-6 5 01-15
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 10/24/2023 Structural Prune 67857 207706 $9.37
WCA 09/26/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 205884 $9.37
WCA 08/21/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 204537 $9.37
WCA 06/30/2023 Tree Monitoring 67857 202306 $9.37
WCA 03/13/2023 Plant 24" Box w/stake,tie (COAST LIVE OAK) 69365 197647 $305.50 carellano 01/25/2023 Call Manager
WCA 11/28/2022 Grid Pruning 69364 193961 $75.40
WCA 08/11/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 190159 $9.37
WCA 07/06/2022 Tree Monitoring 67857 188789 $9.37
WCA 06/06/2022 15 Gallon Tree Planting (AFGHAN PINE) 67857 187794 $160.00

Page 487 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect Infestation
Est. Value
$1,030
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
Leaf Sucking Insects
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07067124915183,-117.8327763453126)(WCA InventoryID: 14867177) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-129 Quercus agrifolia

Page 488 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660695)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-13 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/10/2020 Tree removal (ALEPPO PINE valued at $6,080) 58746 166819 $562.65 WCA 06/05/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 45054 137893 Hourly
WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 489 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
Leaf Sucking Insects
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07063570033879,-117.83269051462413)(WCA InventoryID: 14867178) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-130 Pinus eldarica

Page 490 ends

Maintenance
Inspect-Insect Infestation
Est. Value
$700
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern
Leaf Sucking Insects
VacantSiteInfo
N/A
Priority
N/A
PW Type
Other
Parkway
99 Stems
1 Comments
Aphids, mites
LightClearance
N/A
Valid
Yes
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (34.07060931644449,-117.83277735114099)(WCA InventoryID: 14867179) District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-131 Pinus eldarica

Page 491 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$17,220
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 15227502)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-132 Eucalyptus sideroxylon

RED IRONBARK
31+ 40 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/26/2023 Prune Backup - Crew 69364 196042 Hourly

Page 492 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 14915140)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-133 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 06/10/2022 Tree & Stump Removal 13-24 DSH (RED GUM valued at $3,260)
69193
187278
$617.60

Page 493 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660696)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-14 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/14/2020 Tree removal (RED IRONBARK valued at $9,830) 58746 166819 $918.60 WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 494 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660697)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-15 Vacant site

Page 495 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660698)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-16 Vacant site

Page 496 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660699)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-17 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/14/2020 Tree removal (ALEPPO PINE valued at $6,080) 58746 166819 $562.65 WCA 06/10/2015 Prune Backup - Crew 28040 106554 Hourly
WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 497 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$17,220
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660700)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-18 Eucalyptus sideroxylon

RED IRONBARK
31+ 45 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/14/2020 Tree pruning 58746 166819 $337.40
WCA 06/05/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 45054 137893 Hourly
WCA 06/10/2015 Prune Backup - Crew 28040 106554 Hourly
WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 498 ends

ALEPPO PINE
07-12 10 15-30
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 06/05/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 45054 137893 Hourly
WCA 06/10/2015 Prune Backup - Crew 28040 106554 Hourly
WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 499 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660686)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-2 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2020 Tree removal (RED IRONBARK valued at $17,220) 58746 166819 $918.60 WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 500 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660702)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-20 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
13-18 13 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 06/05/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 45054 137893 Hourly
WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 501 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660703)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-21 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
25-30 25 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 06/05/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 45054 137893 Hourly
WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 502 ends

BLACK WALNUT
07-12 12 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 503 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$1,380
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660705)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-23 Carya illinoinensis
PECAN
07-12 11 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 04/11/2016 Grid Pruning 34405 114740 $60.45
WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 504 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$6,080
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660706)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-24 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
19-24 23 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 06/05/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 45054 137893 Hourly
WCA 08/16/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 505 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660707)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-25 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 03/22/2021 Tree & Stump Removal 13-24 DSH (RED GUM valued at $3,260)
60766
171076
$562.65
WCA 08/16/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 506 ends

JAPANESE BLACK PINE
07-12 12 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 507 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697830)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-27 Eucalyptus camaldulensis

RED GUM
25-30 25 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 508 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$8,610
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697535)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-28 Eucalyptus globulus

BLUE GUM
31+ 37 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 06/05/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 45054 137893 Hourly
WCA 04/11/2016 Grid Pruning 34405 114740 $60.45
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 509 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697831)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-29 Corymbia ficifolia

RED FLOWERING GUM
13-18 18 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/17/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 54407 156850 Hourly
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 510 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660687)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-3 Vacant site

Page 511 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697536)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-30 Corymbia ficifolia

RED FLOWERING GUM
25-30 29 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/17/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 54407 156850 Hourly
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 512 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$17,220
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697832)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-31 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
31+ 38 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 06/05/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 45054 137893 Hourly
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 513 ends

ALEPPO PINE
07-12 11 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/17/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 54407 156850 Hourly
WCA 04/11/2016 Grid Pruning 34405 114740 $60.45
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 514 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697537)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-33 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
25-30 26 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/17/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 54407 156850 Hourly
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 515 ends

ALEPPO PINE
07-12 9 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 04/11/2016 Grid Pruning 34405 114740 $60.45
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 516 ends

ALEPPO PINE
07-12 11 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 04/11/2016 Grid Pruning 34405 114740 $60.45
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly
WCA 07/22/2011 Prune Backup - Crew 19015 74176 Hourly

Page 517 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697539)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-36 Eucalyptus camaldulensis

RED GUM
13-18 18 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 518 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$6,080
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697540)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-37 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
19-24 20 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/17/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 54407 156850 Hourly
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 519 ends

ALEPPO PINE
07-12 9 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 520 ends

ALEPPO PINE
07-12 12 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 521 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660688)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-4 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2020 Tree removal (ALEPPO PINE valued at $17,220) 58746 166819 $918.60 WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 522 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697835)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-40 Corymbia ficifolia

RED FLOWERING GUM
25-30 28 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/17/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 54407 156850 Hourly
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 523 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697836)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-41 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
25-30 25 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 04/11/2016 Grid Pruning 34405 114740 $60.45
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 524 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$6,080
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697542)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-42 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
19-24 20 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 525 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697837)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-43 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
25-30 30 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/17/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 54407 156850 Hourly
WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 526 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$17,220
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697838)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-44 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
31+ 35 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 527 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697543)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-45 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
25-30 25 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 528 ends

RED GUM
07-12 9 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 529 ends

RED GUM
07-12 12 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 08/30/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 82853 Hourly

Page 530 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8697544)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-48 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
25-30 25 45-60

Page 531 ends

RED GUM
07-12 9 45-60

Page 532 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660689)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-5 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2020 Tree removal (ALEPPO PINE valued at $6,080) 58746 166819 $562.65 WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 533 ends

RED GUM
07-12 12 45-60

Page 534 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,040
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 12281236)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-55 Eucalyptus globulus

BLUE GUM
19-24 24 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 06/05/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 45054 137893 Hourly

Page 535 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660690)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-6 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2020 Tree removal (RED IRONBARK valued at $9,830) 58746 166819 $918.60 WCA 06/10/2015 Prune Backup - Crew 28040 106554 Hourly
WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 536 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 11614474)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-67 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 04/07/2017 Tree & Stump Removal 13-24 DSH (ALEPPO PINE valued at $6,080)
38708
124737
$510.60

Page 537 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 13375558)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-68 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
13-18 18 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 01/17/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 54407 156850 Hourly

Page 538 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,040
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 10983773)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-69 Eucalyptus globulus

BLUE GUM
19-24 23 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 46889 142577 Hourly
WCA 04/11/2016 Grid Pruning 34405 114740 $60.45

Page 539 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660691)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-7 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2020 Tree removal (ALEPPO PINE valued at $9,830) 58746 166819 $918.60 WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 540 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 12686440)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-73 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
13-18 16 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 46889 142577 Hourly

Page 541 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 12686441)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-74 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
13-18 16 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 46889 142577 Hourly

Page 542 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 12686442)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-78 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
13-18 16 60+
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 46889 142577 Hourly

Page 543 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8660692)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-8 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/10/2020 Tree removal (ALEPPO PINE valued at $6,080) 58746 166819 $562.65 WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly

Page 544 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 10983774)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-80 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
13-18 18 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 04/11/2016 Grid Pruning 34405 114740 $60.45

Page 545 ends

Maintenance
Plant
Est. Value
$0
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority
N/A
PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 8652937)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
2 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA Slope-9 Vacant site

VACANT SITE
--- 0 ---
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/10/2020 Tree removal (ALEPPO PINE valued at $9,830) 58746 166819 $918.60 WCA 08/15/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22860 82442 Hourly
WCA 07/19/2012 Prune Backup - Crew 22346 81930 Hourly

Page 546 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$6,080
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 10983775)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-91 Carya illinoinensis
PECAN
19-24 19 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 04/11/2016 Grid Pruning 34405 114740 $60.45

Page 547 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 12686443)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-95 Carya illinoinensis
PECAN
13-18 14 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 46889 142577 Hourly

Page 548 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 12686444)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-96 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
13-18 17 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 46889 142577 Hourly

Page 549 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$6,080
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 12686445)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-98 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
19-24 20 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 46889 142577 Hourly

Page 550 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 12686446)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1200 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-99 Pinus halepensis

ALEPPO PINE
25-30 25 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 11/09/2018 Prune Backup - Crew 46889 142577 Hourly

Page 551 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$9,830
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 14139144)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1330 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-70 Eucalyptus camaldulensis

RED GUM
25-30 28 45-60
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 10/06/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 56233 165687 Hourly

Page 552 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 14139145)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1330 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-85 Juglans hindsii
WALNUT
13-18 18 30-45
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 10/06/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 56233 165687 Hourly

Page 553 ends

Maintenance
Grid/Routine Trim
Est. Value
$3,260
Utility
No
Sidewalk Damage
No
PlantHealthConcern VacantSiteInfo
Priority PW Type Parkway
0 Stems Comments LightClearance
Valid
No
Printed 5/30/2025 1:04:07 PM
Site Detail (WCA InventoryID: 14139146)
District Address Location Species DBH DBH (in) Height
1 1330 X PASEO ALONDRA SLOPE-86 Juglans hindsii
WALNUT
13-18 14 15-30
Crew Date Work Type / Comments Job # / Acct # Invoice# Amount WCA 10/06/2020 Prune Backup - Crew 56233 165687 Hourly

Page 554 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Scott Wasserman, Director of Parks & Recreation Subject: Approve a Budget Appropriation of $70,851.50 to Account 01.4414.033 to Complete Repairs to the Via Verde Park Playground
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Request for a Budget Appropriation of $70,851.50 to Account 01.4414.033 to complete repairs to the Via Verde Park Playground Surface that are necessitated by damage caused by the failure of a four-inch water line.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a budget allocation in the amount of $70,851.50 to account 01.4414.033 to complete repairs to the playground surface at Via Verde Park.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost to repair the damaged playground surface at Via Verde Park is $70,851.50, broken out as follows:

1. $14,881.50 for the removal and disposal of damaged playground material and compaction of sub-base (WC Construction Services)

2. $30,975 for the installation of pour-in-place playground surface material (Robertson Recreational)

3. $24,995 for leak detection and plumbing services (McLay Services, Inc.) As this is an unforeseen and unbudgeted repair, allocated funds to complete the project will need to be taken from City reserves.

Page 555 ends

Approve Budget Appropriation of $70,851.50 to account 01.4414.033 to Complete Repairs to the Via Verde Park Playground Page 2
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025

BACKGROUND
A four-inch water main line broke at Via Verde Park and caused significant damage to the adjacent playground pour-in-place rubber surfacing and compacted sub-base material. The water displaced the sub-base and caused the surface material to heave and become unsafe for play. The damage to the playground surface is not covered by any product warranty.

The leak required significant excavation under the foundation of the restroom building. This work was completed by McLay Services, Inc., with the assistance of City staff. McLay Services, Inc. also provided leak detection services to identify the precise location and nature of the leak, as multiple water lines are present at the same location (i.e. beneath the park restroom building).

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The plumbing and leak detection services provided by McLay Services, Inc. are complete. Staff solicited direct bids to remove and replace the damaged playground surfacing. Four contractors where contacted, with two submitting quotes. The lowest bid to install the new playground surface was received from Robertson Recreational Surfaces in the amount of $30,975. The lowest bid to remove and dispose of the damaged playground surface was received from WC Construction in the amount of $14,881.50.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council could elect not to allocate funds to complete the repair to the Via Verde playground surface. In this case, the portion of the playground that is impacted (i.e. a swing set) would remain closed as staff evaluates other options that could include the permanent removal of the playground equipment or the use of wood chips to replace the pour-in-place resilient playground surfacing. The use of wood chips is not recommended, as the playground surface would not match the rest of the playground surface that is pour-in-place resilient surfacing. The wood chips would also need to be replaced several times a year to remain in compliance with playground surface attenuation standards. Additionally, the wood chips do not provide the same level of protection for playground users as the existing pour-in-place surfacing. Staff does not recommend the use of wood chips to replace the resilient playground surface.

Respectfully submitted,
Scott Wasserman
Director of Parks & Recreation
Attachments:

1. Invoice from McLay Plumbing Invoice

2. Quote from Robertson Recreational Surfaces Proposal

3. Quote from WC Construction Services Proposal

Page 556 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 557 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 558 ends

Page 559 ends

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 560 ends

Page 561 ends

Agenda Item Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Anissa Livas, Sr. Management Analyst
Subject: Adopt Ordinance 1325, Updating the Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) pursuant to Government Code Section 51178 and the California Fire Code ____________________________________________________________________________ At the regular City Council meeting of May 27, 2025, the City Council voted 5-0 to introduce Ordinance 1325, updating the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map pursuant to Government Code Section 51178 and the California Fire Code.

Staff recommend the City Council:
• Conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance 1325.

Attachments:

1. Ordinance 1325, updating the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map

Page 562 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE 1325

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS

ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES WHEREAS, Government Code Section 51175(a) declares that wildfires pose a serious threat to the public peace, health, and safety, with ember cast and wind-driven flames impacting areas far beyond the initial fire front; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 51179(a) requires local agencies to designate, by ordinance, Moderate, High, and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones within 120 days of receiving recommendations from the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Government Code Section 51178; and
WHEREAS, in March 2025, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), under the direction of the State Fire Marshal, released updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps for Local Responsibility Areas in Los Angeles County, including the City of San Dimas; and
WHEREAS, these zones were based on current science, topography, vegetation, and climate conditions, and categorize areas of San Dimas as Moderate, High, or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Dimas has reviewed the State Fire Marshal’s recommendation and finds that the map accurately identifies the City’s Fire Hazard Severity Zones as shown in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the map’s availability was made and all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this ordinance have been satisfied.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporates them into this ordinance as findings.

SECTION 2. DESIGNATION. The City of San Dimas hereby designates the Moderate, High, and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones as identified in the map, dated March 24, 2025, prepared and recommended by CAL FIRE and the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Government Code section 51178. That map is hereby incorporated by reference and entitled “City of San Dimas – Los Angeles County – Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones”.

SECTION 3. SUPERSEDURE. All prior ordinances or portions thereof that conflict with this designation are hereby repealed or superseded to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted at the duly designated posting places within the City and published once within 15 days after passage and adoption as may be required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of San Dimas hereby designated for that purpose; or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and certified copy of the text

Page 563 ends

Ordinance 1325 Page 2
Designating Fire Severity Zones
of this Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk five days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and, within 15 days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published, the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas this 10th day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________ ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk Jeff Malawy, City Attorney

Page 564 ends

Ordinance 1325 Page 3
Designating Fire Severity Zones

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )§

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance 1325. It has been published pursuant to law; was introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 27th day of May 2025, and thereafter passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 10th day of June, 2025. It has been published and posted pursuant to law. ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Page 565 ends

City and County boundaries as of 10/22/24 (CA Board of Equalization) CAL FIRE State Responsibility Areas (SRA25_1)
CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZSRA23_3, FHSZLRA_25_1) Data Sources:

Daniel Berlant, State Fire Marshal, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Joe Tyler, Director/Fire Chief, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources, CA Natural Resources Agency The State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Gavin Newsom, Governor, State of California Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Department shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or third party on account of, or arising from, the use of data or maps. and other relevant factors including areas where winds
have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread.
statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, Government Code section 51178 requires the State Fire
Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent Waterbody
Federal Responsibility
Area (FRA)
Unzoned LRA
Incorporated City
Projection: NAD 83 California Teale Albers
Scale: 1:50,000 at 11" x 17"
Km 0 1 2 3 4
Mi 0 1 2
Very High High Moderate
Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in Local Responsibility Area (LRA), as Identified by the State Fire Marshal
San Dimas
210
10 57
210

UNINCORPORATED
LOS ANGELES CO.

CLAREMONT
COVINA

GLENDORA

LA VERNE
POMONA
WALNUT

WEST COVINA
March 24, 2025
As Identified by the
State Fire Marshal
Local Responsibility Area
Fire Hazard Severity Zones
CITY OF SAN DIMAS – LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility
Area (SRA), Effective April 1, 2024
Very High High Moderate

EXHIBIT A

Page 566 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Scott Wasserman, Director of Parks & Recreation Subject: Discussion of Suitable Locations for Pickleball Courts. ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The City Council requested a discussion of suitable locations to construct pickleball courts.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council:
• Receive the report and provide direction as appropriate.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact is dependent on City Council action. At its regular meeting on January 28, 2025, the City Council allocated $49,900 to convert one tennis court at Lone Hill Park into four pickleball courts. Subsequently, at its regular meeting on May 27, 2025, the City Council decided not to proceed with the conversion of a tennis court at Lone Hill Park and approved placing the current appropriation of $49,900 and staff efforts towards working with the Bonita Unified School District (BUSD) to convert the easterly-most tennis court at the Sports Plex into four pickleball courts.

Also, at its regular meeting on May 27, 2025, the City Council directed staff to return to a future meting to discuss and re-evaluate the most suitable park location for constructing pickleball courts, and to discuss concerns expressed by the BUSD regarding the potential construction of pickleball courts at the Sports Plex.

The estimated cost to convert one tennis court into four pickle ball courts is between $29,500 – $49,500. The final cost would depend on the City Council’s desire to install acoustic sound panels

Page 567 ends

Discussion of Cost to Covert a Tennis Court into Four Pickle Ball Courts. Page 2 For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
at a cost of approximately $20,000. The sound panels are designed to deaden the sound of the wood racquet striking the plastic ball by approximately 32 decibels. The sound panels are not required equipment and can be added at a later date, if the City Council desires.

Estimated osts are summarized as follows:

Court Re-Surfacing $22,000
Net Posts Purchasing and
Install $3,500
Chain Link Fencing $4,000
Acoustic Panels $20,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $49,500

BACKGROUND
The City maintains an inventory of sixteen (16) tennis courts that include two (2) courts at Marchant Park, two (2) courts at Pioneer Park, two (2) courts at Ladera Serra Park, two (2) courts at Lone Hill Park and eight (8) courts at the San Dimas Sports Plex. All tennis courts are lighted and are open until 10:00 p.m., per Section 13.16.190 of the San Dimas Municipal Code.

The tennis courts at the San Dimas Sports Plex are maintained by the City as part of a Joint Use Agreement (JUA) between the City and the Bonita Unified School District (BUSD) that dates back to 1987. Per the terms of the JUA, recreation amenities at the Sports Plex, including the tennis courts, are programmed exclusively by the BUSD between the hours of 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Monday - Friday and become available for public use 4:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. during the school week. The tennis courts are also available for public use on weekends between sunrise to 10:00 p.m.

In practice, the BUSD has been allowing public use of the tennis courts during the day provided that the use does not interfere with the San Dimas High School Tennis Program. The BUSD has also used the tennis courts for the San Dimas High School Tennis Program between the hours of 4:00 – 10:00 p.m., which is the time all amenities at the Sports Plex become available for public use per the Joint Use Agreement between the two entities. Per the Joint Use Agreement, the BUSD is permitted to use the tennis courts during the public hours of 4:00 p.m. -10:00 p.m. for CIF or other officially sanctioned tennis competitions with proper notification to the City of San Dimas.

Past City Council action is summarized as follows:

December 10, 2024 - The City Council first considered the construction of pickleball courts in San Dimas at its regular meeting of December 10, 2024. Staff provided aerial diagrams of each park noting the location of tennis courts that belong to the City and the distance of courts from the nearest homes. Staff recommended converting the inner most tennis court at Lone Hill Park into pickleball courts due its location 123 feet from the nearest home. Among tennis courts in City parks, this particular tennis court is situated the farthest from homes compared to any other tennis court. However, the City Council expressed interest in potentially converting a tennis court at the San Dimas Sports Plex. Staff advised that the tennis courts at the Sports Plex are the property of the BUSD and that staff would need to consult with the District for permission to convert one of

Page 568 ends

Discussion of Cost to Covert a Tennis Court into Four Pickle Ball Courts. Page 3 For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
the eight tennis courts on site into pickleball courts. The City Council asked staff to return at a future date to discuss the potential to convert a tennis court at the Sports Plex.

January 28, 2025 - Staff returned to the City Council on January 28, 2025, to report that the BUSD opposed converting one tennis court at the Sports Plex due to the negative impact it would have on the San Dimas High School Tennis Program. The City Council subsequently approved a motion to allocate $49,900 to convert one pickleball court at Lone Hill Park and directed staff not to purchase the acoustic sound panels unless needed, after 12 months of operation. The City Council also directed staff to complete community outreach within a 500-foot radius of the proposed pickleball court and to report back to the City Council if staff received any negative comments. If no negative comments were received, the City Council directed staff to proceed with the conversion of the tennis court.

Staff subsequently mailed outreach postcards on February 13, 2025, to 47 homes that are within 500 feet of the proposed pickleball court at Lone Hill Park. Staff did not receive any complaints or negative feedback from the households that received the outreach postcard. Staff released the Request for Proposal for the project on March 6, 2025, and received four (4) bids on April 1, 2025.

The low bid for the project was received from Truline Construction in the amount of $34,087. A contract with Truline Construction has not been executed and is pending new direction from the City Council.

April 22, 2025 - At its regular meeting on April 22, 2025, the City Council asked staff to agendize a future discussion for the City Council to further discuss the potential conversion of tennis courts at the Sports Plex and Lone Hill Park.

May 27, 2025 – At its regular meeting on May 27, 2025, the City Council voted not to proceed with the conversion of a tennis court at Lone Hill Park and approved placing the current appropriation of $49,900 and staff efforts towards working with the Bonita Unified School District (BUSD) to convert the easterly-most tennis court at the Sports Plex into four pickleball courts.

The City Council also directed staff to work with the BUSD to develop a legal agreement between the two entities that would enable the conversion of the tennis court into four pickleball courts. Furthermore, the City Council directed staff to return to a future meting to discuss and re-evaluate the most suitable park location for constructing pickleball courts, and to discuss concerns expressed by the BUSD regarding the potential construction of pickleball courts at the Sports Plex.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The City Council may wish to consider the following issues as it evaluates the best location(s) for pickleball courts:

Noise/Proximity to Homes - As noted in Attachment 1 (Aerial Maps), there are eight (8) tennis courts at the Sports Plex and additional tennis courts at Lone Hill, Ladera Serra, Pioneer and Marchant Parks. The distance of all City tennis courts from private residences is provided in Attachment 1 and summarized as follows:

1. Sports Plex 213 feet (easterly-most tennis court)

Page 569 ends

Discussion of Cost to Covert a Tennis Court into Four Pickle Ball Courts. Page 4 For the Meeting of June 10, 2025

2. Lone Hill Park 184 feet (inner tennis court)

3. Ladera Serra Park 78 feet

4. Pioneer Park 50 feet

5. Marchant Park 30 feet
Activity Level at Tennis Courts – Staff estimates that the tennis courts at Marchant Park experiences the highest use of any tennis courts located in City parks. One reason for the higher use is that the regular tennis lessons offered by the City’s contracted tennis instructor are conducted at Marchant Park. Tennis courts at Ladera Serra and Pioneer Parks are generally believed to experience lower usage than tennis courts located at Lone Hill Park and The Sports Plex.

Long-Term Maintenance and Ownership- The City bears 100% of the costs associated with the maintenance of the tennis courts in City parks. The tennis courts at the Sports Plex are owned by the BUSD and maintained by the City.

As previously discussed, the City and BUSD maintain a joint use agreement that dates back to 1987. The purpose of the agreement was to facilitate the cooperative development, use and maintenance of recreation amenities at the Sports Plex for community use. Amenities constructed through this agreement are located on the campus of San Dimas High School and are the property of the BUSD. Recreation amenities include tennis courts, ball fields, dugouts, batting cages and restrooms. The City has continued to maintain these amenities over the past 38 years. The City also maintains appurtenant irrigation systems, electrical lighting systems and pays for the cost of electricity. The BUSD is responsible for paying the cost of water for irrigation.

The City maintains these amenities through contracted services that cost approximately $54,000 and the BUSD reimburses the City for half the cost of the contract ($27,000). The BUSD bears 100% of the cost to maintain the varsity baseball field. The stadium and basketball courts are not covered by the JUA and are used and maintained exclusively by the BUSD.

Discussion with the Bonita Unified School District - City and BUSD staff met on June 2, 2025, to discuss concerns expressed by the BUSD relative to the potential construction of pickleball courts at the Sports Plex. The primary concern raised by BUSD is the potential for noise complaints and the need for a process to resolve them. Both City and BUSD staff agreed to develop an amendment to the Joint Use Agreement that specifically addresses the following: 1) The addition of pickleball courts as an approved joint use; 2) A complaint resolution process; and 3) financial responsibility regarding ongoing maintenance and other potential future costs. All other terms of the Joint Use Agreement will remain unchanged. The amendment will ultimately need to be approved by the City Council and the BUSD Board. City staff are working with BUSD staff on a draft amendment, which will come back to the City Council for approval at a future Council meeting.

City staff also contacted McKinley Children’s Center to determine if they had any concerns regarding the potential installation of a pickleball court at the SportsPlex. The Center indicated that they have no objections to the proposed court and do not anticipate any impact on their operations or classes.

Regardless of where the City Council chooses to construct pickleball courts, it may wish to

Page 570 ends

Discussion of Cost to Covert a Tennis Court into Four Pickle Ball Courts. Page 5 For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
direct staff to complete community outreach within a 500-foot radius of the proposed courts and report back to the City Council if any negative feedback is received.

ALTERNATIVES
This item was requested by the City Council at its meeting of May 27, 2025, with a goal of discussing the most suitable location(s) to construct pickleball courts.

1. The City Council could direct staff to convert any of the City’s 16 tennis courts into pickleball courts. A tennis court can be converted into four (4) pickleball courts for an approximate cost of $35,000-$40,000, which does not include the purchase of acoustic sound panels. The purchase of the acoustic sounds panels is optional and would cost an estimated additional $20,000. If the City Council wishes to construct pickleball courts at more than one location, a new budget allocation of approximately $50,000 would be required.

2. The City Council may elect not to convert any existing tennis courts into pickle ball courts at any location. If the City Council elects not to convert tennis courts into pickle ball courts, the tennis courts are well used at all locations and will continue to serve the San Dimas community. In this scenario, the funds the City Council allocated to construct pickleball courts at Lone Hill Park (that were subsequently re-allocated for inclusion in the FY 2025-26 Budget) could be returned to the City’s reserves.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This item is Categorically Exempt under the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 6, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section 15301 Existing Facilities Class 1 operations which consists of the operation, repair, maintenance or minor alteration of existing public or private facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

Respectfully submitted,
Scott Wasserman
Director of Parks & Recreation
Attachments:

1. Aerial maps of Sports Plex, Marchant, Pioneer, Ladera Serra and Lone Hill Parks Tennis Courts

Page 571 ends

Sportsplex Tennis
Courts
889 Cypress St
Closest residence
is 26ft away
Use hours:

Sunrise -10:00 PM
SPLEX
Tennis
Courts
ATTACHMENT 1 1

Page 572 ends

Page 573 ends

Actual Court to
be converted is
184 ft away
from residence
Lone Hill Park
500 N Shellman Ave
Closest residence is 123ft
away
Use Hours: 8am - 10pm
Use Hours: Sunrise - 10:00 PM
123 Feet
184 Feet
3

Page 574 ends

Marchant Park
425 Juanita Ave
Closest residence is
30ft away

Page 575 ends

Pioneer Park
225 S. Cataract Ave
Closest residence is 50 ft away

Page 576 ends

Ladera Serra Park
975 Calle Serra
Closest residence is 78 ft
away

Page 577 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Steven Barragan, Engineering Manager
Subject: Introduce Ordinance 1327 Amending the San Dimas Municipal Code, Section

10.06 Thereto Designating Speed Limits on Certain Streets in the City of San Dimas
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The California Vehicle Code permits local authorities, by Ordinance, to establish speed limits based upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. The City Engineer was tasked to prepare and administer a new engineering and traffic survey for San Dimas streets. Several San Dimas streets have warranted a decrease in speed limit and one increased. As a result, Municipal Code, Section 10.06 Speed Limits will be amended to reflect the changes in speed by amending and superseding Ordinances 1261 and 1269.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
• Read by title and Introduce Ordinance 1327 to re-establish speed limits GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is minimal fiscal impact to the City for the recommended action. Speed limit signs will need to be removed and replaced with updated speed limits for segments that differ from existing.

Page 578 ends

Introduction of Ordinance 1327, Designating Speed Limits on Certain Streets Page 2 For the Meeting of June 10, 2025

BACKGROUND
The California Vehicle Code, Sections 22357 and 22358, permits local authorities, by ordinance, to establish speed limits based upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. Section 40802 further states that for any speed limit set pursuant to Section 22357, and if enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic device that measures the speed of moving vehicles, the speed limit must be justified by an engineering and traffic survey. Setting a speed limit without the benefit of a supporting traffic speed survey constitutes a "speed trap" and is considered illegal. The law further specifies that these surveys must be conducted every five (5) years to be enforceable. The surveys can be extended to seven (7) years provided the City’s enforcement officer(s) have completed a radar operator course and the radar or other electronic devices used have the proper equipment calibration certificates. Furthermore, the law allows for some surveys to be extended to fourteen (14) years if a registered engineer evaluates and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume.

The Sheriff’s Department has been a great partner training multiple deputies for traffic enforcement and keeping their radar equipment properly calibrated for the enforcement of the posted speed limits within our City boundaries.

In early 2018, Council adopted the current speed limits set by the engineering and traffic survey conducted in 2017. In early 2023, a two-year extension was granted.

The City Engineer was recently tasked to prepare a new engineering and traffic survey for San Dimas. The survey involved gathering and evaluating speed radar data, traffic count data, traffic collision data for a three-year history, and other contributing factors such as adjacent land use, roadway conditions, and continuity of speed limits.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The recently conducted engineering and traffic survey evaluated eighty-nine (89) street segments in San Dimas. A copy of the complete engineering and traffic survey report is available at City Hall’s Public Works counter. The results of the survey depict a thorough evaluation of the data available and recommend a speed limit for each street segment included.

The recommendations were reviewed by the Sheriff’s Department as well as the City’s Traffic Safety Committee.

In most cases there is no change from the existing speed limit, but thirty (30) segments warranted a change in speed. Twenty-nine (29) segments are recommended to decrease, and one (1) segment is recommended for an increase. The following are the recommended/proposed change in speed limits:

Street Limits Existing
Speed Limit
Proposed
Speed Limit
Arrow Highway San Dimas Avenue to Walnut Avenue 45 40
(Decrease)
Badillo Street West City Limit to Valley Center
Avenue
45 40
(Decrease)
Baseline Road Amelia Avenue to San Dimas Avenue 35 40

Page 579 ends

Introduction of Ordinance 1327, Designating Speed Limits on Certain Streets Page 3 For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
(Increase)
Bonita Avenue Arrow Highway to Cataract Avenue 35 30
(Decrease)
Cataract Avenue Covina Boulevard to Arrow Highway 40 35 (Decrease)
Valley Center Avenue to Lone Hill
Avenue
40 35
(Decrease)
Cienega Avenue
Lone Hill Avenue to Arrow Highway 40 35
(Decrease)
Badillo Street to Lone Hill Avenue 40 35
(Decrease)
Lone Hill Avenue to SR-57 Freeway 40 35
(Decrease)
Covina Boulevard
SR-57 Freeway to Cataract Avenue 40 35
(Decrease)
Badillo Street to Valley Center Avenue 40 35
(Decrease)
Cypress Street
Valley Center Avenue to Lone Hill
Avenue
40 35
(Decrease)
Amelia Avenue to San Dimas Avenue 35 30
(Decrease)
San Dimas Avenue to Walnut Avenue 35 30
(Decrease)
Gladstone Street
Walnut Avenue to San Dimas Canyon
Road
35 30
(Decrease)
Gladstone Street to Arrow Highway 40 35
(Decrease)
Arrow Highway to Cienega Avenue 40 35
(Decrease)
Cienega Avenue to Covina Boulevard 35 30
(Decrease)
Lone Hill Avenue
Covina Boulevard to Cypress Street 35 30
(Decrease)
West City Limit to Via Esperanza 45 40
(Decrease)
Puente Street
Via Esperanza to Via Verde 45 40
(Decrease)
Foothill Boulevard to SR-210 Freeway 40 35
(Decrease)
SR-210 Freeway to Gladstone Street 40 35
(Decrease)
Arrow Highway to 1000’ s/o
Puddingstone Drive
40 35
(Decrease)
1000’ s/o Puddingstone Drive to
Avenida Loma Vista
50 45
(Decrease)
Avenida Loma Vista to Via Verde 50 45
(Decrease)
San Dimas
Avenue
San Dimas Avenue (Loop Junction) to
Avenida Melisenda
35 30
(Decrease)
Valley Center Badillo Street to Cypress Street 40 35

Page 580 ends

Introduction of Ordinance 1327, Designating Speed Limits on Certain Streets Page 4 For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
Avenue (Decrease)
Cypress Street to Gainsborough Road 40 35
(Decrease)
Walnut Avenue Arrow Highway to Teague Drive 30 25
(Decrease)

ALTERNATIVES
Council may elect to deny this request which would make the existing speed limits more challenging to enforce and could also be considered illegal.

Respectfully submitted,
Steven Barragan
Engineering Manager
Attachments:

1. Ordinance 1327, Amending San Dimas Municipal Code by Amending Section 10.06 Designating Speed Limits on Certain San Dimas City Streets

2. Existing and Recommended Speed Limits

3. City Map of Recommended Speed Limits

Page 581 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE 1327

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS

ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE SAN DIMAS MUNCIPAL CODE BY AMENDING THE SECTION 10.06 THERETO DESIGNATING SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS IN

THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS
NOW, THREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN DIMAS, California does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1: Section 10.06.100 of the San Dimas Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Section 10.06.100. In accordance with the provisions of Section 22357 and Section 22358 of the Vehicle Code of the State of California, the City of San Dimas hereby determines that the speed limits on certain streets are necessary for the orderly and safe movement of traffic in the City of San Dimas. Based on the engineering and traffic surveys of RKA Consulting Group presented to it, as required by Section 22358 of the Vehicle Code of the State of California, the City Council finds and determines that the speed limit set forth below are those most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are responsible and safe and shall be the prima facie speed limits for the areas identified herein.

EXISTING AND PROPOSED SPEED LIMITS
Street Limits Existing Proposed
Speed
Limit
Speed
Limit
Allen Avenue Amelia Avenue to San Dimas Canyon Road 35 35 NC Amelia Avenue Fifth Street to Allen Avenue 25 25 NC
Arrow Highway Valley Center Avenue to San Dimas Avenue 40 40 NC San Dimas Avenue to Walnut Avenue 45 40 D
Walnut Avenue to East City Limit 45 45 NC
Badillo Street West City Limit to Valley Center Avenue 45 40 D Valley Center Avenue to Covina Boulevard 40 40 NC
Baseline Road Amelia Avenue to San Dimas Avenue 35 40 I San Dimas Avenue to San Dimas Canyon
Road
35 35 NC
Bonita Avenue Arrow Highway to Cataract Avenue 35 30 D
Cataract Avenue to Walnut Avenue 25 25 NC
Walnut Avenue to East City Limit 40 40 NC
Cataract Avenue Covina Boulevard to Arrow Highway 40 35 D Arrow Highway to Fifth Street 25 25 NC
Cienega Avenue Valley Center Avenue to Arrow Highway 40 35 D Covina Boulevard Valley Center Avenue to Badillo Street 35 35 NC

Page 582 ends

Ordinance 1327 Page 2
Amending San Dimas Municipal Code, Section 10.06.100
Badillo Street to Cataract Avenue 40 35 D
Cypress Street Badillo Street to Lone Hill Avenue 40 35 D Lone Hill Avenue to 550' east of Danecroft
Avenue
35 35 NC
Eucla Avenue Arrow Highway to Bonita Avenue 30 30 NC
Bonita Avenue to Fifth Street 25 25 NC
Foothill Boulevard Cataract Avenue to East City Limit 45 45 NC Gladstone Street Lone Hill Avenue to Amelia Avenue 35 35 NC Amelia Avenue to San Dimas Canyon Road 35 30 D
Golden Hills Road San Dimas Canyon Road to East City Limit 30 30 NC Lone Hill Avenue Gladstone Street to Cienega Avenue 40 35 D Cienega Avenue to Cypress Street 35 30 D
Puddingstone
Drive
San Dimas Avenue to East City Limit 30 30 NC
Puente Street West City Limit to Via Verde 45 40 D
Via Verde to Via Amadeo 25 25 NC
San Dimas
Avenue
Foothill Boulevard to Gladstone Street 40 35 D
Gladstone Street to Arrow Highway 35 35 NC
Arrow Highway to 1000' south of
Puddingstone Drive
40 35 D
1000' south of Puddingstone Drive to Via
Verde
50 45 D
Via Verde to San Dimas Avenue (Loop
Junction)
35 35 NC
San Dimas Avenue (Loop Junction) to
Avenida Melisenda
35 30 D
Avenida Melisenda to San Dimas Ave (Loop
Junction)
30 30 NC
San Dimas
Canyon Road
Golden Hills Road to Foothill Boulevard 35 35 NC
Foothill Boulevard to Arrow Highway 40 40 NC
Sycamore Canyon
Road
San Dimas Canyon Road to North End 25 25 NC
Valley Center
Avenue
Badillo Street to Gainsborough Road 40 35 D
Via Verde Covina Hills Road to San Dimas Avenue 45 45 NC San Dimas Avenue to SR-57 Freeway 35 35 NC
Walnut Avenue Foothill Boulevard to Arrow Highway 30 30 NC Arrow Highway to Teague Avenue 30 25 D
Teague Avenue to Puddingstone Drive 25 25 NC
ABBREVIATIONS: NC = No Change, I = Increase, D = Decrease, NP = Not Posted

Page 583 ends

Ordinance 1327 Page 3
Amending San Dimas Municipal Code, Section 10.06.100
SECTION 2 SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 3 EFFECTIVE DATE AND PUBLICATION This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its final passage, and within 15 days after its passage the City Clerk shall cause it to be published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation (GC§40806) in the City of San Dimas hereby designated for that purpose.

SECTION 4 This Ordinance supersedes Ordinance 1261 and 1269.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas this 24th day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________ ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk Jeff Malawy, City Attorney

Page 584 ends

Ordinance 1327 Page 4
Amending San Dimas Municipal Code, Section 10.06.100

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )§

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance 1327. It has been published pursuant to law; was introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 10th day of June 2025, and thereafter passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 24th day of June, 2025. It has been published and posted pursuant to law. ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Page 585 ends

Page 586 ends

Page 587 ends

Page 588 ends

Page 589 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Lauren Marshall, Sr. Management Analyst
Subject: Approve a Second Amendment Authorizing a Three-Year Extension to the Amended and Restated Agreement for Solid Waste Management Services with USA Waste of California, Inc.
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a Second Amendment to the City’s solid waste agreement with Waste Management to extend services through December 31, 2030. The amendment incorporates State-mandated program updates, including contamination monitoring, recovered organic waste procurement, and annual route reviews, to support SB 1383 compliance. The procedure for adjusting customer rates will continue to be subject to City Council approval and follow the existing procedure but will use the Consumer Price Index year over year average ending in May. There are no changes to customer rates at this time. This short-term extension ensures regulatory compliance, service continuity, and rate stability while the City monitors evolving industry and legislative developments.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve:
• The Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement for Solid Waste Management Services, originally executed on October 3, 2017, with USA Waste of California, Inc., a Delaware corporation doing business as Waste Management of San Gabriel/Pomona Valley, to extend the agreement for an additional three years, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Yes

FISCAL IMPACT

Page 590 ends

Approve Second Amendment Authorizing Three-Year Extension to the Amended and Restated Agreement for Solid Waste Management Services with USA Waste of California, Inc. Page 2 For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
There is no direct fiscal impact; however, approval of the Second Amendment will release previously budgeted funds for Fiscal Year 2025-26 that were originally allocated to support a competitive procurement process (RFP).

There is no change in fees or solid waste rates for San Dimas customers because of this Second Amendment. Solid waste rates remain subject to annual adjustments based on the original Agreement’s rate adjustment methodology. This amendment will change the Consumer Price Index year over year data to begin in June.

All rate adjustments are required to be reviewed and approved by City Council before implementation.

BACKGROUND
The City of San Dimas executed an Amended and Restated Agreement with Waste Management on October 3, 2017, and approved a First Amendment on September 13, 2022. The current term was originally set to expire on December 31, 2027. To provide stability and regulatory compliance during a period of evolving legislation, staff recommended a three-year extension to the agreement through December 31, 2030. City Council reviewed staff’s recommendation at a Study Session on January 28, 2025, and directed staff to pursue and negotiate a three-year extension with WM (Attachment 1).

Over the course of several months, multiple virtual and in person meetings were held between City staff, Waste Management representatives, HF&H Consultants, and the City Attorney’s office to review, negotiate, and finalize the terms of the Second Amendment. These collaborative discussions focused on aligning contract language with regulatory requirements, clarifying service expectations, and ensuring operational feasibility. All parties have reviewed and agreed to the final terms outlined in the Second Amendment, which are reflected in the version presented to the City Council for approval.

This Second Amendment was developed in consultation with HF&H and Waste Management to support compliance with Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383) and other solid waste mandates (Attachment 2).

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The Second Amendment incorporates the following key term, programmatic and compliance elements in accordance with State requirements without affecting customer rates:
• Agreement Term
o Agreement term date amended to December 31, 2030
• Organics and SB 1383 Mandatory Collection Services
o Updated language throughout to align with SB 1383 terminology for organics o Updated language to require mandatory collection services for organics, recycling, and solid waste.
o Included SB 1383 required language regarding noticing for the processing of plastics and compostable plastics.
• SB 1383 Waivers
o Updated SB 1383 Waiver process language and time to process waivers

Page 591 ends

Approve Second Amendment Authorizing Three-Year Extension to the Amended and Restated Agreement for Solid Waste Management Services with USA Waste of California, Inc. Page 3 For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
• Contamination Tagging Program Enhancements:
o Residential customers: increased non-collection contamination events from one event/warning tag to two contamination events/warning tags within one year; contamination fees may be applied upon the third event. Physical tagging requirements
o Commercial customers: contamination fee applied after the first contamination event with ongoing monitoring and updated language to align with WM SMART Truck SM.
• Annual Hauler Route Reviews:
o Updated language to require annual SB 1383 hauler route reviews to document contamination through use of WM’s Smart Truck system for photo documentation and reporting.
• Facility Waste Evaluations:
o Updated language to require participation in City-mandated and State-required waste characterizations and evaluations as needed.
• Recovered Organic Waste Product (ROWP) Procurement:
o Updated language to require Contractor to broker and supply the City’s required annual procurement target (~2,720 tons/year) of compost or mulch to meet SB 1383 compliance.
• Service Modifications: Updates to commercial and residential cart size offerings and service requirements.
o Updates to commercial and residential cart size offerings and service requirements.
o Clarifications to the designated collection location authority and waiver procedures.
• Public Education and Outreach:
o Enhanced educational materials, route tagging notices, and digital communications on contamination and proper waste sorting. • Consumer Price Index:
o Adjusted industry standard CPI to be calculated based on CPI from June to May to ensure proposed solid waste rates are properly reviewed while adhering to the January 1, rate effective date.
• Reporting
o Modified monthly reporting requirements to quarterly and as needed due to regulatory requirements, and updated SB 1383 reporting responsibilities.

The Second Amendment will help the City remain compliant with SB 1383, AB 341, AB 1826, AB 939 and other State laws while continuing to provide high-quality waste services without disruptions or off-schedule rate increases.

ALTERNATIVES
In addition to the recommendation, the following alternative actions are available for the City Council’s consideration:
• Direct Staff to Pursue Competitive Procurement (RFP Process): Issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to competitively bid solid waste, recycling, and organics services. o Pros: Provides market rate pricing and potentially innovative service proposals. o Cons: Higher ratepayer costs due to risk of service disruption and regulatory uncertainty related to SB 54 (Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging

Page 592 ends

Approve Second Amendment Authorizing Three-Year Extension to the Amended and Restated Agreement for Solid Waste Management Services with USA Waste of California, Inc. Page 4 For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
Producer Responsibility Act) and Advanced Clean Fleet (mandated Electric/Clean Fuel Fleet) and may complicate negotiations. • Initiate Sole-Source Negotiation for a New Long-Term Franchise Agreement directly with Waste Management.
o Pros: Ensures service continuity with an existing provider. o Cons: Difficult to ensure market rate pricing. Higher rates due to above mentioned pending regulatory impacts and uncertain long-term costs. • Defer Action and Request Further Analysis or Revisions: Delay approval of the Second Amendment and request additional revisions or information. o Pros: Allows for more time to evaluate specific terms or incorporate additional enhancements.
o Cons: Delay weakens City’s negotiation position and jeopardizes City’s ability to comply with SB 1383 requirements; adds costs to rate payers to secure ROWP procurement requirements. The agreement would still expire in 2027 without an extension in place and subject the City to State fines and penalties for lack of compliance.
• Take No Action: Allow the current agreement to continue without amendment. o Pros: No immediate changes.
o Cons: May result in higher rates for customers and jeopardize City’s ability to comply with SB 1383 requirements. The agreement would still expire in 2027 without an extension in place and subject the City to State fines and penalties for lack of compliance.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Amending the Franchise Agreement with Waste Management is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061 (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 15061 (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines states activities of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment may be exempt under the common-sense exemption. The collection and disposal of solid waste is mandated and regulated by state law. The City is amending an existing service contract that currently provides the City’s waste collection and hauling services.

Respectfully submitted,
Lauren Marshall
Sr. Management Analyst
Attachments:

1. Staff Report – Solid Waste Services Evaluation (January 28, 2025)

2. Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement

3. Levine Act Disclosure Form

Page 593 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Study Session
Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Lauren Marshall, Sr. Management Analyst
Subject: Solid Waste Services Evaluation
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The City of San Dimas is preparing for the expiration of its solid waste services agreement with the current waste hauler, Waste Management, on December 31, 2027. To explore future service options, the City engaged HF&H, a leading consultant within the waste disposal industry, who identified potential paths for City Council consideration:
• Option 1: Competitive Procurement: This may allow the City to explore better rates and terms, but carries risks such as service disruptions, procurement challenges, and unresolved regulatory uncertainties (e.g., California's Advanced Clean Fleet and Plastic Pollution laws).
• Option 2: Sole-Source Negotiation: Directly negotiating a new agreement with WM ensures service continuity but might limit flexibility, expose the City to potential rate increases, and not address regulatory challenges effectively. • Option 3: Three-Year Extension of Existing Agreement: This provides stability, time to assess upcoming regulatory impacts (such as zero-emission vehicles and packaging laws), and minimizes risks related to changing providers or contract terms.

Based on the analysis, City staff recommend pursuing Option 3: Three-Year Extension of Existing Agreement. This option offers the best balance of stability, regulatory compliance, and time to adapt to future changes in the industry. City staff recommends that the City Council provide direction to staff to pursue the negotiation of a three-year extension with Waste Management.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council:

Page 594 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 2
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025
• Provide direction to staff to negotiate a three-year extension amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement for Solid Waste Management Services A three-year extension to the current Agreement with Waste Management (WM) provides stability, ensures regulatory compliance, and offers time to navigate evolving industry trends and regulatory changes without the disruptions and risks associated with switching providers or negotiating a long-term agreement prematurely. The three-year extension will also allow the City to prepare for future changes in the waste management landscape, including the transition to Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEV) and new packaging regulations, while maintaining continuity of service for residents and businesses.

FISCAL IMPACT
Among the three options considered in the City's solid waste collection analysis, Option 3: ThreeYear Extension of Existing Agreement, is the most cost-effective choice for the City in the short term. Once an agreement extension expires, the City will need to consider additional future procurement costs. Below are the estimated fiscal impacts associated with the various contracting and procurement options for consulting negotiation and professional services:
• Option 1: Competitive Procurement: $250,000 to $300,000 • Option 2: Sole Source Negotiation of a New Franchise Agreement: $150,000 to $175,000 • Option 3: Three-Year Extension of Existing Agreement: $60,000 to $80,000

BACKGROUND
The City entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement for Solid Waste Management Services with WM on October 31, 2017, with a subsequent amendment on September 13, 2022.

The current term of this agreement will conclude on December 31, 2027. Under this franchise, WM is responsible for providing recycling, organics, and solid waste collection services to residential, commercial, multi-family, and industrial customers, along with additional diversion programs to ensure the City meets state regulatory requirements.

As the agreement nears expiration, the City of San Dimas engaged HF&H to evaluate various solid waste contracting and procurement options. HF&H was selected for this analysis not only because of its deep familiarity with the City—having previously assisted in drafting the City’s SB 1383 Action Plan, ongoing CalRecycle/SB 1383 assistance, and continued rate adjustment analysis support—but also due to its extensive expertise in the field.

HF&H's broad experience in solid waste contracting, negotiations, and procurement across California was a key factor in the City’s decision. With over 500 local jurisdictions served, HF&H is a recognized leader in solid waste procurements and has negotiated with nearly every collection company in the state. This wealth of experience is backed by a robust database of cost metrics, industry trends, and regulatory impacts. Notably, HF&H recently conducted a comprehensive rate analysis and survey for Los Angeles County, further enhancing its capacity to provide wellinformed recommendations in the local region. This expertise directly influenced HF&H's analysis of the contracting options available to the City.

HF&H anticipates that key regulatory changes—including the California Advanced Clean Fleet (ACF) regulation, the Plastic Pollution and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act (SB 54), and the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy (SB 1383)—will significantly impact solid waste services and costs. These changes are expected to drive substantial infrastructure

Page 595 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 3
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025
investments in both the near and long term, which will factor into the City's decision-making process for solid waste, recycling, and organics services.

Additionally, the most significant challenge to local jurisdictions from both a cost and technology risk perspective is the transition from conventional fuels to the new Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) standards required under ACF regulations for medium and heavy-duty vehicles. This transition involves equipment whose reliability at scale remains unproven, risking service interruptions on days when trucks are inoperable, and the capital costs can be up to twice that of traditional truck types. Furthermore, these costs will include infrastructure for charging or hydrogen fueling, which adds significantly to the financial considerations. The City remains committed to ensuring compliance with these regulations while maintaining high service quality and rate stability for the community.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Scope of Procurement/Contractual Analysis and Review
Starting in July 2024, staff engaged HF&H in several meetings to explore various solid waste contracting options. These discussions covered a range of approaches, including sole-source negotiations, competitive procurement processes, contract extensions (both short- and longterm), regional agreements, and the potential for creating distinct collection service districts within the City. Following these meetings, staff, with support from HF&H, surveyed neighboring communities to gain a broader understanding of local contracts, rates, and infrastructure opportunities in the region.

The City and HF&H also conducted several interview sessions with neighboring communities, as outlined below. The survey and interviews were limited to the information that agencies could publicly disclose. Additionally, HF&H leveraged recently available rate survey data, survey responses, and agreement documents to help inform their analysis.

Area Solid Waste Service Contract Arrangements
Staff requested that HF&H prepare a comprehensive analysis of the service arrangements for the cities of Pomona, Claremont, Covina, Glendora, Azusa, and La Verne. This evaluation included a review of baseline service rates, contract terms, rate adjustment methodologies, and options for contract extensions. Each jurisdiction was compared to the City of San Dimas across each of those evaluation areas.

In September 2024, the City and HF&H further engaged with representatives from the cities of Covina, Claremont, and La Verne to gain deeper insights into their contract terms, rates, and performance. This effort aimed to assess the effectiveness of existing agreements and address any recent transitional needs, where applicable. Table 1 below details and compares various key contractual service terms for the analyzed cities.

Page 596 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 4
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025
Table 1: Comparison of Selected Solid Waste Contract Terms Regional Analysis of Facilities and Collection Service Providers The map below illustrates the local infrastructure for recycling, organics, and solid waste used by neighboring communities, which are primarily serviced by WM, Athens Services, or directly by municipal agencies. It highlights the locations of materials recovery facilities (MRFs), organics processing facilities, transfer stations, and landfills. Due to the distance of regional landfills from the cities they serve, materials are typically transported via transfer stations or MRFs. As such, the strategic placement of these facilities is crucial, as it significantly influences operational efficiency and competitive pricing.

Service and Rate Terms Azusa Claremont La Verne Pomona San Dimas Population 49,000 36,000 49,000 52,000 32,000 146,000 34,003 Hauler AthensServices MunicipallyCollected WasteManagement AthensServices WasteManagement Residential 3-Container with64- GallonRefuseCart $ 43.99 $ 34.30 $ 44.82 (1) $ 44.26 (2) $ 31.41 $ 30.89 $ 38.22 Commercial 2CYTrash $ 228.00 $ 177.01 $ 212.34 $ 230.47 (2) $ 162.34 $ 298.81 $ 182.15 Commercial 2CYRecycling N/A NoCharge(3) $ 75.49 (4) N/A $ 36.67 $ 74.13 $ 98.52 Commercial Organics64-Gallon Cart $ 129.39 NoCharge(3) $ 135.17 $ 99.08 (2) $ 96.76 $ 91.56 $ 85.50 RateAdjustment Methodology CPIplus1%, maxof 10% CPI CPIplus1% (5) CPIplus1% (6) CPI CPI 75%CPI/Service 25%Disposal
RateAdjustment Cap 10% 3% 6% (7) N/A 5%
5%fortheService Component
Contract Term Evergreen(20-year) N/A Evergreen(25-year) Evergreen(20-year) 10-year 10-year 10-year Contract EndDate N/A N/A December 31, 2030 November 2033 December 31, 2027 (1) Rateonlyavailableto low-incomegenerators.
(2) RateeffectiveJuly1, 2023.
(3) Commercial customershaveunlimited recyclingand organics serviceat no additional charge. (4) Rateis for 1.5 CYbin.
(5)In addition to annual rateadjustment,ratehasaphase-in of $3.68 on residential ratesand $2.48 on commercial and multi-familyrates, phased-in fromJuly1, 2022 to July1, 2025. (6)In addition to theannual rateadjustment theCityimplemented afive-year phase-in for commercial ratesor 8%annuallybeginningJuly1, 2023. (7)If theAnnual RateAdjustment exceeds6%theCityand hauler will meet and conferto modifyrateadjustment calculations. (8) Jurisdictionsmayhavefees in addition to theirFranchiseFees, includingAB939Fee,SB1383Fees, andAdministrativeFees.

Intent toterminatecan
not beissuedpriorto
July1, 2038.

Intent toterminatecan
not beissuedpriorto November 1, 2029.

Other Contract Terms
Covina Glendora
N/A
AthensServices AthensServices Rates Effective 7/1/2024

Page 597 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 5
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025

Page 598 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 6
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025
Regulatory Impact
City staff and HF&H analysis included careful consideration of major developments in the industry and new legislation for City consideration, such as the pending conversion to ZEVs, horizon regulatory impacts (e.g., ACF, SB 54), and specific challenges the City is facing such as SB 1383 Recovered Organic Waste Product (ROWP) procurement.

California Advanced Clean Fleet Regulation (ACF)
The ACF regulation seeks to accelerate the transition of medium- and heavy-duty trucks to ZEVs.

It establishes mandatory requirements for the adoption of ZEVs within targeted fleets, including both public and privately contracted haulers, starting in 2024.

However, the transition is complicated by several factors, including technological limitations, regulatory uncertainties, and concerns over infrastructure availability and reliability. These challenges are particularly pronounced for heavy-duty ZEV trucks used in solid waste collection, which are currently twice the cost of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. Additionally, the operational performance of ZEVs in solid waste collection is still unproven at scale, and there is limited national production capacity.

Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCEVs) both comply with ACF regulations, but each faces distinct challenges. BEVs offer potential savings on fueling costs, but their effectiveness is limited by underdeveloped charging infrastructure and insufficient power grid capacity, which struggle to meet the demands of fleet operations. These challenges are compounded by the reliability issues of the current power grid, which can be disrupted during public emergencies, power outages, and other catastrophic events, further impacting energy supply. Additionally, BEV refuse trucks require several hours to fully charge, and they may struggle to complete typical routes—especially in inclement weather or on hilly, rough terrain— compared to Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) refuse trucks. The added weight of the battery also reduces payload capacity, limiting the amount of refuse that can be collected and transported. As a result, fleets may require more BEVs than ICE vehicles to maintain operational efficiency.

In contrast, FCEVs do not face the same limitations in load capacity and refueling time, as they can be refueled in minutes, similar to ICE vehicles. These attributes make FCEVs a more attractive option for refuse collection. However, the higher cost of hydrogen fuel ($4-7 per mile compared to $1-2 per mile for conventional fuels) increases operational expenses, presenting a significant barrier. These infrastructure and cost challenges are likely to drive up solid waste collection costs, complicating the transition to cleaner vehicle technologies.

As a result, the ACF regulations will require significant investments in both vehicle fleets and infrastructure, directly impacting the City's service contract. The City anticipates that this technology will develop over time, providing much better clarity on performance, costeffectiveness, and infrastructure development if decisions about this are delayed by 2-3 years.

The City’s discussions with WM reinforced that position, as WM is piloting individual trucks in certain markets to get experience and fully intends to comply with ACF, but is not yet prepared to commit to a full ZEV fleet.

Page 599 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 7
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025
SB 54 “Plastic Pollution and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act” Adopted in 2022, SB 54 establishes a comprehensive Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) program aimed at managing packaging and single-use plastic food ware products across all sectors of the economy. Under this legislation, CalRecycle requires producers to ensure that all packaging and plastic food ware sold in California is recyclable or compostable and holds them further responsible for covering the costs associated with the collection and processing of these materials.

Local jurisdictions must accept and recycle materials covered under SB 54, necessitating close collaboration with their service providers, such as WM, to ensure compliance with these regulations. Jurisdictions will also need to seek reimbursement for eligible costs from packaging producers. It is expected that CalRecycle will finalize SB 54 regulations in early 2025, while the Producer Responsibility Organization will be tasked with developing an implementation and reimbursement plan by 2027. Subsequently, implementation, collection, and financial impacts from SB 54 may continue to remain uncertain over the next several years.

SB 1383 “Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy” Since 2022, SB 1383 has required the City to further enhance recycling and organic waste landfill reduction services and programs related to food waste, source separated recycling, food recovery, and Recovered Organic Waste Product (ROWP) procurement. The City has delegated most of its compliance requirements under SB 1383 to WM. Pursuant to the current Agreement, WM must materially comply with applicable laws as they may be enacted and amended during the term. As described in WM’s letter dated October 29, 2021, WM’s current provision of organics collection services and SB 1383 programming extends beyond the current terms of the agreement because of continued negotiations with the City.

Meeting with Waste Management
The City and HF&H met with WM on August 29, to discuss and assess opportunities and barriers related to the three options being considered by the City for recycling, organics, and solid waste collection service needs.

It is important to note, that as part of the analysis, the City and HF&H did not conduct direct negotiations with Waste Management, and any conclusions regarding future contracting arrangements, including the potential impact on rates, remain subject to further negotiations.

At the meeting, the City and HF&H discussed and had a mutual understanding of the following:
• A competitive RFP process was discussed between the City and WM. WM indicated a preference to avoid a competitive RFP altogether, with an opportunity to negotiate an extension.
• WM indicated a strong preference for extending the contract on a longer-term basis but would need to consider the rate impacts and how to deal with upcoming issues like the ACF/ZEV transition.
• WM and the City discussed the impact of near-term changes in the industry, like the ACF/ZEV transition and SB 54, and identified that it may be advantageous to do a shortterm extension to get a better understanding of those changes to reduce regulatory and technology risk under the new contract.

Page 600 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 8
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025
• WM indicated a willingness to continue under the current terms, including current PI provisions, for 3 more years if there are no significant changes to services. • A contract extension beyond three years would imply a ZEV transition to comply with the ACF regulations.
• The City indicated a desire for WM to continue to meet SB 1383 recovered organic waste product procurement during such an extension. WM said they would have to assess that request.

Options Available to the City
Based on the City and HF&H’s analysis of regulatory and contract conditions, the following were identified as the most likely options for City Council’s consideration:

Option 1: Competitive Procurement
Under Option 1, the City would initiate a competitive procurement process for an agreement to provide recycling, organics, and solid waste collection and processing services, to be effective on January 1, 2028. This process would allow the City to test the market for more competitive rates, service offerings, and contract terms.

Key Elements of Option 1 Competitive Procurement
• The expiration of the current agreement provides a clear opportunity for the City to conduct a competitive market test. This process would assess compensation, rates, and service offerings, ensuring the City secures the best value and terms available in the market. • The competitive procurement process will be structured to solicit updated contract terms and innovative solutions, particularly in response to increasing regulatory pressures and evolving customer demands. This would ensure that the City stays ahead of emerging trends and challenges in recycling, organics, and solid waste collection. • The competitive procurement process would span 18 to 24 months for execution, followed by an additional 6 to 12 months for contract transition. This extended timeline accounts for the complexity of the process, including the development of detailed specifications, evaluation of proposals, and the transition to new service providers, if applicable.

Option 1 Benefits
• Enhances the public perception of fairness, ensuring that all interested service providers can propose on the contract. This transparency helps demonstrate accountability in awarding a large, public contract.
• Would allow multiple companies to participate, potentially introducing new service providers who could offer unique or innovative approaches to the City’s recycling, organics, and solid waste programs.
• Rates and service terms would be determined through a competitive bidding process, which helps ensure that the City receives the best possible pricing based on current market conditions and competition.
• May open opportunities for regional contract partnerships, allowing the City to explore synergies with neighboring jurisdictions. This could lead to efficiencies and cost savings through consolidated service delivery or shared resources.

Option 1 Considerations
• The new agreement would need to be flexible enough to anticipate potential regulatory changes, including those related to SB 54 and ACF.

Page 601 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 9
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025
• New regulations such as ACF and SB 54 carry undetermined cost risks, and service providers may factor these uncertainties into their pricing and proposals, leading to potentially higher rates than necessary.
• Opportunity for the designation of “Collection Service Districts” within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries would be limited based on the size and service magnitude of the jurisdiction. Essentially, splitting the City into Collection Service Districts would require a larger City than San Dimas.

Option 2: Sole Source Negotiation of a New Franchise Agreement Under Option 2, the City would initiate negotiations with WM for a new longer-term (10-15 year) Franchise Agreement, focusing on the key terms that align with both the City's needs and evolving legislative requirements. This would include an extended term, regulatory compliance, new rates, and service guarantees.

Key Elements of Option 2 Sole Source Negotiation
• Negotiation of New Franchise Agreement Terms:
o The agreement would be renegotiated for a longer term (10 or 15 years), allowing for stability and long-term planning.
o Terms would include updated provisions for compliance with new regulations like SB 1383, SB 54, and ACF.
o New rates would be negotiated, including the updating of rate adjustment methodologies to address inflation, regulatory compliance costs, and changes in service levels.
o Service guarantees and compliance standards would be added and/or updated for clarity, minimizing risk, and ensuring performance.
• Sole Source Negotiation Process:
o The City would negotiate directly with WM, bypassing a competitive procurement process initially.
o A key feature of this approach is an "off-ramp" for transitioning to a competitive procurement process if sole-source negotiations do not lead to a successful agreement. This provides the City with flexibility if negotiations fail to reach a satisfactory outcome.

Option 2 Benefits
• Retains continuity of service from a known provider.
• WM already understands the City’s unique service requirements and customer needs, which can make the sole-source negotiation process smoother and more aligned with City objectives.
• Streamline through a sole-source procurement and provide for a quicker negotiation timeline.
• Reduces service disruptions or transition issues, by avoiding the transition to a new service provider.
• The sole-source negotiation would focus on updating existing terms, limiting service impacts to only those adjustments made through the negotiation process (as opposed to a complete overhaul that might come with a new provider or agreement).

Page 602 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 10
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025
Option 2 Considerations
• Prior to commencing a sole-source negotiation process, the City must set a target date and assign corresponding resources to pivot to competitive negotiations if negotiations fail.
• Limits flexibility in adjusting terms to market conditions. • Current uncertainty around regulatory changes (e.g., ACF, SB 54) may introduce cost risks to a sole-source negotiation, prior to maturity and implementation of regulations.

Option 3: Three Year Extension of Existing Agreement
Under Option 3, the City would consider extending its current agreement with WM for an additional three-year period, from January 1, 2028, through December 31, 2030. To maintain continuity of services, programs, and regulatory compliance, all parties must agree to the following terms in a timely manner to avoid a lapse of the current agreement.

Key Elements of Option 3 Extension
• Three-year extension of the existing Agreement with limited modifications to the contractual terms. The Agreement under a three-year extension would include the following:
o Retention of current rate adjustment methodology, which includes annual rate adjustments based on service and disposal components, in alignment with regional industry standards.
o Continued compliance with SB 1383 services and programs, as mandated by CalRecycle.
o Inclusion of additional contractual provisions requiring WM to procure ROWP to meet the City’s SB 1383 procurement targets. WM has agreed to procure ROWP for the 2024 targets as a courtesy; however, the extension may require formalizing this commitment. The City may also need to update the agreement to reflect other SB 1383-related organic waste programming provided by WM outside the current agreement.

Option 3 Benefits
• Continuity of service from a provider familiar with the City’s unique needs and customer base.
• Avoidance of a negotiation or RFP process that is prolonged or complicated by the uncertainty of pending regulations.
• Potential rate stabilization for the near term, compared to market rates and the potential future impacts of regulatory changes.
• Mitigation of the risks associated with transitioning to a new service provider. • Additional time to understand and adapt to the regulatory impacts of SB 54 and ACF regulations.
• No disruption to services for residents, businesses, and the City.

Option 3 Considerations
• Potential limitation on negotiating additional enhancements to the agreement, such as expanded services (e.g., bulky item collection), updated performance standards, or revised compensation terms.
• Constraints on the City’s ability to adjust agreement terms and rates in response to evolving market conditions in the short term

Page 603 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 11
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025
Based on the analysis, City staff recommends Option 3: “Three Year Extension of Existing Agreement”. This option provides stability, ensures regulatory compliance, and offers time to navigate evolving industry trends and regulatory changes without the disruptions and risks associated with switching providers or negotiating a long-term agreement prematurely. The threeyear extension will also allow the City to prepare for future changes in the waste management landscape, including the transition to ZEV’s and new packaging regulations, while maintaining continuity of service for residents and businesses.

Key Reasons for the Recommendation

1. Regulatory Flexibility and Mitigation of Risk: The upcoming regulatory changes, particularly with the California Air Resources Board ACF regulation, SB 54, and SB 1383, create uncertainty. Extending the agreement allows the City to navigate these evolving regulatory landscapes while reducing the immediate risks and costs associated with transitioning to a new service provider or negotiating a long-term franchise agreement that might not adequately address these future challenges. The three-year extension also provides time to plan for a cost-effective implementation of ACF requirements and the broader impacts of SB 54.

2. Time to Assess Technological and Market Trends: By opting for a short-term extension, the City gains valuable time to observe the full impact of regulatory changes, including the financial implications of and technology options for transitioning to ZEVs, and to assess market trends. This additional time will allow the City to negotiate future contracts with a clearer understanding of costs, technological advancements, and regulatory compliance needs.

3. Continuity and Stability: Extending the current agreement with WM for an additional three years ensures continuity of service. WM has met their obligations under the current agreement except for some short-term issues during COVID-19. Additionally, any change that may result in changing service days would need to be well considered, planned for, and noticed.

4. Avoidance of Prolonged Negotiations in the short term: A three-year agreement extension delays the need for a full negotiation in the short-term facilitating a buffer during current regulatory uncertainty. Given the basic terms of a three-year extension, minimal negotiation should be required. This option also provides additional time for the City to negotiate again with an exclusive provider once ACF and SB 54 are better understood, further limiting uncertainty within a future negotiation process. A three-year extension also stabilizes costs for the near term, protecting the City and its residents from potential market volatility or regulatory-driven price increases.

5. Continuity of SB 1383 Compliance: The City has already implemented programs, services, and rates to comply with SB 1383, with WM playing a pivotal role in the City’s organic waste diversion programs. The extension would formalize WM’s continued support for these regulations, including the procurement of recovered organic waste products to meet the City’s procurement targets. The extension also allows the City to assess the effectiveness of SB 1383 programs prior to potentially impacting costs associated with a new franchise agreement.

ALTERNATIVES
In addition to the recommendation, the following alternative actions are available for the City Council’s consideration:

Page 604 ends

Solid Waste Services Evaluation Page 12
For the Meeting of January 28, 2025

1. Competitive Procurement
A competitive procurement process offers the City an opportunity to explore more favorable rates, services, and contract terms by testing the market. However, this approach may introduce risk, including potential service disruptions and staff time required for both procurement and transition processes. Furthermore, regulatory uncertainties related to the ACF and SB 54 are unlikely to be resolved before the completion of the procurement process. As a result, there may be a need for unforeseen contract amendments or adjustments once a new agreement is in place.

2. Sole-Source Negotiation of a New Franchise Agreement This option entails negotiating a new, longer-term agreement directly with WM. While it ensures continuity with a known provider, it carries the risk of not addressing regulatory uncertainties related to the ACF and SB 54, which are unlikely to be resolved before completing a sole-source negotiation. As a result, the City Council may be asked to agree to a long-term contract without fully understanding the cost impact of these new laws.

Additionally, a sole-source approach may expose the City to potential rate increases, as it would bypass a market test for competitive pricing and limit the City's flexibility to adapt to evolving program and service needs in the future.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not Applicable
Respectfully submitted,
Lauren Marshall
Sr. Management Analyst

Page 605 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

SECOND AMENDMENT TO

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
This Second Amendment ("Second Amendment") is entered into this ___ day of June, 2025, by and between the City of San Dimas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and USA Waste of California, Inc., a Delaware corporation dba Waste Management of San Gabriel/Pomona Valley, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor" to amend the Solid Waste Franchise Agreement made and entered into in the County of Los Angeles, State of California on October 31, 2017 ("Agreement") and the First Amendment to Solid Waste Management Services Franchise Agreement made and entered into in the County of Los Angeles, State of California on September 13, 2022 (“First Amendment”) by and between City and Contractor (collectively, the Agreement and First Amendment shall be referred to as “Existing Agreement”). All terms used herein shall, unless otherwise defined, have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.

Recitals
WHEREAS, City approved the Agreement on October 31, 2017, WHEREAS, City approved the First Amendment to the Agreement on September 13, 2022,
WHEREAS, City and Contractor desire to amend the Existing Agreement to change the months in which the service component is calculated to allow City adequate time to review the proposed rate adjustment prior to the implementation of the proposed rates,
WHEREAS, SB 1383 establishes regulatory requirements for jurisdictions, generators, haulers, solid waste facilities, and other entities to support achievement of statewide organics wastes disposal reduction targets, WHEREAS: SB 1383 requires City to implement collection programs, meet

Page 606 ends

2 | P a g e
processing facility requirements, conduct contamination monitoring, provide education, maintain records, submit reports, monitor compliance, conduct enforcement, and fulfill other requirements; and, City has chosen to delegate some of its responsibilities to the Contractor, acting as City’s designee, through this Second Amendment,
WHEREAS, both parties have, in good faith, negotiated changes to the Existing Agreement necessary to support City’s compliance with SB 1383, as set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration and for the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Section 5.1 (Term) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

The term of this Existing Agreement commences on January 1, 2018 and shall be in effect until the close of business on December 31, 2030.

2. Section 6.1 (Commercial/Industrial Collection) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

6.1 Solid Waste Bin Service. Contractor will provide permanent and temporary bin service to commercial/industrial accounts that request these services. After the execution date of this Second Amendment, all new commercial/industrial accounts shall be provided with solid waste, recyclable material, and organics waste bins, with the exception of commercial/industrial accounts for whom the City issues an organics waste recycling waiver (“waiver”) pursuant to SB 1383. Contractor will collect and remove all solid waste, recyclable material, and organics waste that is

Page 607 ends

3 | P a g e
placed in bins from every commercial/industrial account receiving bin service, at least once every week, or more frequently if required to handle the waste stream of the commercial/industrial premises where the bins are located. Contractor will deliver and collect temporary bins at the direction of the commercial/industrial account. Special consideration will be given when determining the pickup area to ensure that the flow of traffic is not impeded. The designated collection location, if disputed by the commercial/industrial account or Contractor, shall be determined by the C.M. Additionally, if in the C.M.'s opinion the location of an existing collection location is inappropriate for aesthetic or safety reasons, the C.M. may require the commercial/industrial account or Contractor to relocate the collection location.

Contractor shall, upon request, assist commercial/industrial accounts in assessing if they qualify for a waiver pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 42652 (“SB 1383”). Contractor shall provide such assistance as may be necessary for the City to evaluate any application submitted for such a waiver and providing City with any information or data regarding the commercial/industrial account’s premises, service levels, or other factors which may be necessary to enable City to evaluate a waiver request.

City shall provide Contractor with a copy of any waiver it grants. Waivers granted after related services have commenced for a commercial/industrial account shall become effective five (5) working days after Contractor receives notice of such waiver from the City, in order to allow sufficient time for Contractor to adjust services for a commercial/industrial account. Contractor shall perform a review of waivers at the request of the City and as may be necessary to enable the City to determine if the criteria by which the waiver was granted is still applicable.

Contractor shall document any ongoing activity Contractor undertakes in connection with this section and provide data related to ongoing eligibility for a waiver in its customer service database. A summary of such information shall be provided by Contractor, in a form reasonably acceptable to City along with Contractor’s quarterly and annual reports to City.

Page 608 ends

4 | P a g e

3. Subsections of 6.6 (Recyclable Material and Organics Waste Collection) of the Existing Agreement are hereby amended to read as follows:

6.6.2 Contractor shall collect and remove all recyclable material and organics waste placed in containers from every commercial/industrial premises receiving recyclable material and organics waste collection service, at least once every week or more frequently if required to handle the materials generated by the commercial/industrial premises where the container or containers are located.

6.6.3 Recyclable Material Collected. Contractor and City agree that the list of materials to be collected in the commercial/industrial recycling program as set forth in Exhibit 2 shall be reviewed from time to time and may be modified by the mutual agreement of both parties.

6.6.4 Under Public Resources Code Sections 42649.2 (AB 341), 42649.81 (AB 1826), and 42652 (SB 1383), commercial/industrial premises are required to arrange for collection of recyclable material and organics waste. Contractor shall make good faith efforts to assist the City to implement the requirements of Public Resources Code Sections 42649.2 (AB 341), 42649.81 (AB 1826), and 42652 (SB 1383), including the education, outreach, and monitoring requirements of those laws.

Contractor shall make information available to commercial/industrial customers related to Contractor’s commercial/industrial organics waste recycling program and recyclable materials program and shall promote said programs through Contractor’s website, mailers, brochures, billing inserts, email content, social media, and online announcements. Contractor agrees to identify all commercial/industrial customers subject to the requirements of AB 341, AB 1826, and SB 1383, and provide periodic on-site visits to such commercial/industrial accounts to offer and promote recyclable material and organics waste collection

Page 609 ends

5 | P a g e
services as required, attempt to resolve any logistical detriments to providing these services, and notify and request assistance from the City for potential follow up action where there is a repeated refusal to implement these services.

6.6.5 Plastics and Compostable Plastics in the Commercial/Industrial Organics Waste Program. As of the effective date of this Second Amendment, the commercial/industrial accounts organics waste recycling program does not accept plastics or compostable plastics. Accordingly, Contractor may prohibit commercial/industrial accounts from placing plastic bags, including plastic compostable bags, in organics waste containers. If the approved facility to which organics waste is delivered changes to one that accepts plastics or compostable plastics, or if the currently approved facility begins to accept plastics or compostable plastics, Contractor shall allow commercial/industrial accounts to place plastic bags in organics waste containers that comply with all applicable laws and meet such criteria as deemed acceptable to the approved facility.

4. Section 6.7.4 (Record of Non-Collection; Contamination) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

6.7.4.1 Record of Non-Collection. When solid waste, recyclable material, or organics waste is not collected by Contractor, a tag will be fastened to the container, which is the least 2-7 /8", by 5-3/4" in size indicating the reason for noncollection. In addition to a record of non-collection tag, Contractor shall also provide notice thereof to the applicable customer by delivering the notice by mail, electronic mail, text, or other electronic means as approved by the City. Reasons for non-collection may include the presence of hazardous waste or hazardous substances in the container, materials placed in plastic bags or otherwise not in the required containers, blocked containers, the commingling of recyclable material or organics waste with non-recyclable solid waste, or overfilling of a rolloff box such that it would cause a violation of applicable weight restrictions.

Page 610 ends

6 | P a g e
Contractor will maintain a log that shall contain the name and address of each commercial/industrial account where solid waste is tagged and the date such tagging. The log will be maintained for inspection by the C.M. and the reporting requirements outlined in Article 12.

6.7.4.2. If the recyclable material container or organics waste container was not collected due to excessive contamination of ten percent (10%) or more (with either hazardous waste, solid waste or non-organics waste in the organics waste container, or hazardous waste, solid waste, green waste or non-recyclable material in the recycling container), Contractor shall document the contaminated container in a manner that complies with the applicable laws, which may be with its Smart TruckSM system, which shall at a minimum demonstrate: (i) ten percent (10%) or more of the contents of the container is comprised of materials other than that for which the container is designated, and (ii) the identity of the customer to whom the container was provided by Contractor. Contractor shall record such event in a computer logging/data-base system and include the date, time, customer’s address, type of container (i.e., whether designated for general solid waste, organics waste, or recyclable materials) as well as video or photographic evidence of the contamination directly connecting it to the customer/owner of the container. Contractor shall retain the video/photographic evidence of the incident to enable reasonable review, including review in connection with a customer’s challenge to Contractor’s determination that customer set out a contaminated container for collection.

Contractor shall notify the customer of the contaminated container incident as soon as reasonably feasible, as detailed below. In addition, Contractor shall provide the customer with educational materials related to the appropriate items to be placed in each container. Contractor shall maintain the forgoing records and provide them to the City as part of its quarterly reporting, or more frequently if necessary to comply with City’s enforcement obligations set forth in applicable laws.

Page 611 ends

7 | P a g e
The Contractor’s notification shall provide the following information to the customer:
a. The reason for non-collection was because the contents could not be recycled due to the presence of excessive amounts of non-recyclable material and/or non-organics waste in the container;
b. What materials are and are not to be placed in the recyclable material container or organics waste container;
c. That a subsequent incident of contamination may result in non-collection, the imposition of a contamination fee, and, where warranted, requiring additional or larger-sized solid waste containers or additional collection frequency at an additional cost to customer; and
d. A phone number in case the customer has any questions.

In lieu of tagging and non-collection due to excessive contamination of the recyclable material container or organics waste container, Contractor may elect to collect the container as solid waste and charge the commercial/industrial customer a contamination fee. Where such evidence was presented to the commercial/industrial account, and Contractor documents another instance of excessive contamination within one (1) year of such presentation, Contractor is authorized to charge a contamination fee, deliver the next larger-sized container to the commercial/industrial account or increase service frequency, and adjust the service rate accordingly. Contractor will maintain a log listing all commercial/industrial accounts where excessive contamination was observed, and actions taken in response by Contractor, which shall be maintained for inspection by the C.M. and the reporting requirements outlined in Article 12. In addition, Contractor will provide the C.M. with verbal and written notification prior to delivering the next larger-sized container or increasing service frequency, and adjusting the service rate at a commercial/industrial account.

6.7.4.3 Contamination Monitoring. Beginning at the execution of this Second Amendment and annually thereafter, Contractor shall conduct annual hauler route

Page 612 ends

8 | P a g e
reviews of commercial/industrial customers per the requirements of Subsection

6.7.4.3.1 below and annual hauler route reviews of residential customers per the requirements of Subsection 7.8.1.3.1 for compliance with the City’s collection program and container contamination monitoring.

6.7.4.3.1 Annual Hauler Route Review. Contractor shall annually monitor the contents of containers using a hauler route review methodology that complies with the requirements of 14 California Code of Regulations Section 18984.5(b). Contractor shall visually inspect the contents of a reasonably representative number of containers per hauler route, as directed and approved by City, to search for contamination. The containers shall be randomly selected by a method approved by City. For example, Contractor may accomplish this by conducting reviews of the Containers using WM Smart Truck℠, by which Contractor records and saves images of the contents of containers and thereafter reviews such records for purposes of contamination monitoring.

After the execution of this Second Amendment, Contractor shall submit its proposed hauler route review methodology no later than January 15 of the following calendar year. The proposed methodology shall describe Contractor’s schedule for performance of the hauler route review, a plan for container inspections, and a plan for prioritizing the inspection of customers that are more likely to be out of compliance.

City shall review, comment on, and approve the proposed methodology and Contractor may commence with the proposed methodology upon approval.

If City notifies Contractor that CalRecycle has indicated to the City the methodology is inadequate to meet the requirements of SB 1383, Contractor shall, at its sole expense, revise the methodology and, after obtaining City approval, conduct additional hauler route reviews, increased container inspections, or implement other changes using the revised procedure.

City may request, and Contractor shall accept, modifications to the schedule

Page 613 ends

9 | P a g e
to permit observation by City. In addition, Contractor shall provide email notice to City no less than ten (10) business days prior to each scheduled hauler route review that includes the specific time(s), which shall be within the City’s normal business hours, and location(s).

Contractor shall document contamination with still pictures or video through the use of WM Smart TruckSM, and may use pictures and video for educational purposes, and will notify the customer of the contamination by following the applicable procedures specified in Sections 6.7.4.1 and

6.7.4.2. 5. Section 7.4 (Green Waste Cart Service) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

7.4.1. Contractor will provide weekly cart service for collection of organics waste to all residential premises receiving cart service for solid waste, on the same day as solid waste collection. Contractor will provide each residential premise one 96- gallon organics waste cart, but may provide smaller 64-gallon or-35 gallon carts where required by space limitations at a residential premise or physical limitations of the customer.

7.4.2 Accounts may obtain additional organic waste carts at the rate set forth in Exhibit 1.

7.4.3. Residential accounts with a driveway exceeding seventy-five feet in length or with a steep slope may, upon request, receive three 35-gallon organics waste carts in exchange for the 96-gallon cart. Other residential accounts will be allowed to exchange the organics waste cart for another size at no charge.

7.4.4 The designated collection location of carts, if disputed by the account or Contractor, will be determined by the C.M. Additionally, if in the C.M.'s opinion the

Page 614 ends

10 | P a g e
existing collection location is inappropriate, the C.M. may require the account or Contractor to relocate the collection location.

6. Section 7.6 (Recyclable Material and Organics Waste Collection) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

7.6.1 Contractor will provide recyclable material and organics waste collection service using bins or carts, as appropriate, to all residential accounts receiving bin services at the rates set forth in Exhibit 1.

7.6.2 Contractor shall collect and remove all recyclable material and organics waste placed in containers from every residential premises receiving recyclable material and organics waste collection service, at least once every week or more frequently if required to handle the materials generated by the residential premises where the container or containers are located.

7.6.3 The designated collection location of containers, if disputed by the account or Contractor, will be determined by the C.M. Additionally, if in the C.M.'s opinion the existing collection location is inappropriate, the C.M. may require the account or Contractor to relocate the collection location.

7.6.4 Recyclable Material Collected. Contractor and City agree that the list of materials to be collected in the residential recycling program as set forth in Exhibit 2 shall be reviewed from time to time and may be modified by the mutual agreement of both parties.

7.6.5 Under Public Resources Code Sections 42649 .2 (AB 341), 42649 .81 (AB 1826), and 42652 (SB 1383), multi-family residential premises are required to arrange for collection of recyclable material and organics waste. Contractor shall

Page 615 ends

11 | P a g e
make good faith efforts to assist the City to implement the requirements of Public Resources Code Sections 42649.2 (AB 341), 42649.81 (AB 1826), and 42652 (SB 1383), including the education, outreach, and monitoring requirements of those laws.

Contractor agrees to provide such assistance, and more specifically to identify all residential customers subject to the requirements of AB 341, AB 1826, and SB 1383, provide periodic on-site visits to such premises, to offer and promote recyclable material and organics waste collection services as required, attempt to resolve any logistical detriments to providing these services, and notify and request assistance from the City for potential follow up action where there is a repeated refusal to implement these services. Contractor shall make information available to residential customers related to Contractor’s residential organics waste recycling program and recyclable materials program and shall promote said program through its website, mailers, brochures, billing inserts, email content, social media, and online announcements.

7.6.6 Plastics and Compostable Plastics in Residential Organics Waste Program.

As of the effective date of this Second Amendment, the residential accounts organics waste recycling program does not accept plastics or compostable plastics. Accordingly, Contractor may prohibit residential accounts from placing plastic bags, including plastic compostable bags, in organics wastes containers.

If the approved facility to which organics waste is delivered changes to one that accepts plastics or compostable plastics, or if the currently approved facility begins to accept plastics or compostable plastics, Contractor shall allow residential accounts to place plastic bags in organics waste containers that comply with all applicable laws and meet such criteria as deemed acceptable to the approved facility.

7. Section 7.8.1 (Record of Non-Collection) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

Page 616 ends

12 | P a g e

7.8.1.1. When solid waste is not collected by Contractor, a tag will be fastened to the container, which is the least 2-7/8", by 5-3/4" in size indicating the reason for non-collection. In addition to a record of non-collection tag, Contractor shall also provide notice thereof to the applicable customer by delivering the notice by mail, electronic mail, text or other electronic means. Reasons for non-collection may include the presence of hazardous waste or hazardous substances in the container, materials placed in plastic bags or otherwise not in the required containers, placement of palm fronds or large tree trunks or limbs into the organics waste cart, the commingling of recyclable material or organics waste with nonrecyclable solid waste, blocked containers, or the compacting of solid waste in such a manner that the contents of a container will not of their own weight fall out of the container when it is turned upside down. Contractor will maintain a log that shall contain the name and address of each account where solid waste is tagged and the date such tagging. The log will be maintained for inspection by representatives of the City upon request and the reporting requirements outlined in Article 12.

7.8.1.2. If the recyclable material container or organics waste container was not collected due to excessive contamination of ten percent (10%) or more (with either hazardous waste, solid waste non-organics waste in the organics waste container, or hazardous waste, solid waste, green waste, or non-recyclable material in the recycling container) Contractor shall document the contaminated container in a manner that complies with the applicable laws, which may be with its WM Smart TruckSM system, which shall at a minimum demonstrate: (i) ten percent (10%) or more of the contents of the container is comprised of materials other than that for which the container is designated, and (ii) the identity of the customer to whom the container was provided by Contractor. Contractor shall record such event in a computer logging/data-base system and include the date, time, customer’s address, type of container (i.e., whether designated for general solid waste,

Page 617 ends

13 | P a g e
organics waste, or recyclable materials) as well as video or photographic evidence of the contamination directly connecting it to the customer/owner of the container.

Contractor shall retain the video/photographic evidence of the incident to enable reasonable review, including review in connection with customer’s challenges to contractor’s determination that Customer set out a contaminated container for collection.

The Contractor’s notification shall provide the following information to the customer:
a. The reason for non-collection was because the contents could not be recycled due to the presence of excessive amounts of non-recyclable material and/or non-organics waste in the container;
b. What materials are and are not to be placed in the recyclable material container or organics waste container;
c. That a subsequent incident of contamination may result in non-collection, the imposition of a contamination fee, and, where warranted, requiring additional or larger-sized solid waste containers or additional collection frequency at an additional cost to customer; and,
d. A phone number in case the customer has any questions.

Page 618 ends

14 | P a g e
(1) year of such presentation, Contractor is authorized to charge a contamination fee upon the third instance, deliver the next larger-sized container to the residential account., and adjust the service rate accordingly. Contractor will maintain a log listing all residential accounts where excessive contamination was observed, and actions taken in response by Contractor, which shall be maintained for inspection by the C.M. and the reporting requirements outlined in Article 12. In addition, Contractor will provide the C.M. with verbal and written notification prior to delivering the next larger-sized container or increasing service frequency, and adjusting the service rate at a residential account.

7.8.1.3 Contamination Monitoring. Beginning at the execution of this Second Amendment and annually thereafter, Contractor shall conduct annual hauler route reviews of commercial/industrial customers per the requirements of Section

6.7.4.3.1 and annual hauler route reviews of residential customers per the requirements of Subsection 7.8.1.3.1 below for compliance with the City’s collection program and container contamination monitoring.

7.8.1.3.1 Annual Hauler Route Review. Contractor shall provide ongoing monitoring of the contents of containers using a hauler route review methodology that complies with the requirements of 14 California Code of Regulations Section 18984.5(b). Contractor shall visually inspect the contents of a reasonably representative number of containers per hauler route, as directed and approved by City, to search for contamination. The containers shall be randomly selected by a method approved by City. For example, Contractor may accomplish this by conducting reviews of the containers using WM Smart Truck℠, by which Contractor records and saves images of the contents of containers and thereafter reviews such records for purposes of contamination monitoring.

After the execution of this Second Amendment, Contractor shall submit its proposed hauler route review methodology no later than January 15 of the

Page 619 ends

15 | P a g e
following calendar year. The proposed methodology shall describe Contractor’s schedule for performance of each hauler route’s annual review, plan for container inspections, and it’s a plan for prioritizing the inspection of customers that are more likely to be out of compliance.

City shall review, comment on, and approve the proposed methodology and Contractor may commence with the proposed methodology upon approval.

City may request, and Contractor shall accept, modifications to the schedule to permit observation by City. In addition, Contractor shall provide email notice to City no less than ten (10) business days prior to each scheduled hauler route review that includes the specific time(s), which shall be within the City’s normal business hours, and location(s).

Contractor shall document contamination with still pictures or video through the use of WM Smart TruckSM, and may uses pictures and video for educational purposes, and will notify the customer of the contamination by following the applicable procedures specified in Sections 7.8.1.1 and

7.8.1.2. 8. Article 8 (City Facilities) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

Contractor will provide solid waste, recyclable material, and organics waste collection services at the City facilities identified in Exhibit 3, and any additional facilities upon request of City at no additional cost. Collection services at City offices will include providing a container for the collection of batteries, office paper,

Page 620 ends

16 | P a g e
and fluorescent light bulbs.

9. Article 10 (Education and Public Awareness) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

10.1 General. Contractor acknowledges that education and public awareness are essential elements of efforts to achieve AB 939, AB 341, AB 1826, and SB 1383 requirements. In cooperation with the City, Contractor shall regularly identify opportunities for, barriers to, and incentives for organics waste recycling, and shall engage in customer education and outreach related to organics waste recycling to facilitate City’s compliance with the City’s obligation to conduct outreach and education as set forth in the applicable laws, including AB 939, AB 341, AB 1826, SB 1383, and all implementing regulations. The method(s) by which Contractor contacts Customers for these purposes, unless otherwise specified, may be by any reasonable means Contractor desires (which may include direct mail, email, telephone calls, site visits and/or such other methods as Contractor reasonably deems appropriate), provided that such customer education and outreach methods result in compliance with all applicable laws.

Accordingly, Contractor will implement a public education program to expand public and customer awareness concerning the necessity for methods of reducing, reusing, and recycling solid waste. Contractor must cooperate fully with City in this regard. The detailed public education program is included as Exhibit 4 to this Existing Agreement. By November 1 of each year, Contractor will submit a revised public education program for the upcoming twelve (12) month period for review and approval by the C.M. At a minimum, the public education program will consist of two (2) mailers each year to all commercial/industrial accounts describing recycling and organics waste services with follow up calls to commercial/industrial accounts most likely to generate high volumes of recycled materials and organics waste, and two (2) mailers each year to all residential accounts consisting of a newsletter, a fact sheet describing available services, the rates for services, and the holiday pickup schedule. In addition, the public

Page 621 ends

17 | P a g e
education program will include events to promote recycling and other diversion techniques at public schools located in the City. The information submittal required under Section 22.2 may be included as part of Contractor's public education program.

10.2. Community Events. At the direction of the C.M., Contractor will participate in, promote recycling and other diversion techniques, and provide recycling and organics waste containers at community events and designated local activities.

This participation would normally include providing educational information promoting the goals of the City's solid waste diversion and recycling program.

10.3. Waste Generation/Characterization Studies; CalRecycle Report. Contractor acknowledges that the City may be required periodically to perform solid waste generation and disposal characterization studies to comply with AB 939, facility evaluations as required under SB 1383, or other waste diversion requirements.

Contractor agrees to participate in, and to cooperate with the City and its agents in the preparation of these studies at no additional cost to the City. Contractor will prepare the initial draft of the annual diversion report submitted to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery ("CalRecycle") to City, sufficiently in advance of the due date to allow for timely submission by the City to the CalRecycle.

10. Section 11.4.4 (Bin Specifications) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

Contractor will provide bin containers for collection of solid waste, the collection of recyclable material, and for the collection of organics waste, as appropriate for individual residential or commercial/industrial accounts. Contractor must maintain its bins in a clean and sound condition, free from putrescible residue. Bins must be equipped with reflectors to enhance visibility. Bins must be constructed of

Page 622 ends

18 | P a g e
heavy metal, or other durable material, and must be water resistant and well painted. Wheels, forklift slots, and other appurtenances, which are designed for movement, loading, or unloading of the bin, must be maintained in good repair.

Repairs or graffiti removal requested by an account must be completed within two (2) business days of Contractor's receipt of the request.

11. Section 11.8 (End Uses for Green Waste) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to add the following:

End Uses for Organics Waste. Contractor will use reasonable efforts to divert from disposal organics waste collected through curbside collection, and through holiday tree collections. Contractor will also use reasonable efforts to provide end uses for organics waste that maximize diversion credits for the City in accordance with regulations established by CalRecycle.

Contractor shall serve as a direct service provider for City in procuring and brokering compost or mulch to meet the City’s annual SB 1383 recovered organics waste product procurement target, for each calendar year, or portion thereof, through the term of the Existing Agreement. Contractor shall annually facilitate the procurement of approximately two thousand seven hundred twenty (2,720) tons of compost or mulch that meets the requirements of 14 CCR Section 18993.1(f)(1) and 14 CCR Section 18993.1(f)(4), respectively. City and Contractor shall meet each November, unless otherwise provided below, to discuss City’s procurement target and discuss the upcoming allocation of organic wastes product procurement, whether wholly or partially met through a direct service provider arrangement.

Upon a request for SB 1383 implementation record by a Regulator or the City, Contractor shall provide City and Regulator with copies of invoices and other records required by SB 1383 to evidence procurement of compost or mulch in accordance with Article 12.

Contractor shall perform this service at no additional cost to the City for the

Page 623 ends

19 | P a g e
remaining term of this Agreement, unless there are demonstrable and material changes to Contractor’s costs in procuring organic waste products to meet City’s procurement target or where changes in applicable laws demonstrably and materially impact Contractor’s cost of providing this service. In such a case, Contractor may request a rate adjustment as set forth in Section 22.6.2 for the City’s reasonable consideration.

12. Section 11.9 (Transportation of Solid Waste) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

Transportation of Solid Waste. Contractor must transport all solid waste collected to a permitted transfer station or disposal site. Contractor must transport all recyclable materials collected to a permitted material recovery facility (“MRF”).

Contractor must transport all organics waste it collects to a permitted organic waste processing facility where it is processed in a manner in accordance with 14 CCR Section 18983.1(b). Should there be a need to change the organic waste processing facility due to a change in applicable law or as may be directed by the City, then Contractor may request an extraordinary rate adjustment in accordance with Section 22.6.2. Contractor will use reasonable efforts to divert recyclable material from landfill disposal. Contractor will maintain and, upon request, provide the City with complete, accurate, and up-to-date records of the quantities of solid waste transported to the transfer station, MRF, organic waste processing facility, or disposal site, and must cooperate with the City in any audits or investigations of those quantities.

13. Section 12.2 (Reporting) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

12.2.1 General Reporting. Contractor shall maintain records and data relating to the performance of this Existing Agreement in forms that facilitate preparation of

Page 624 ends

20 | P a g e
useful reports, and the efficient transfer of needed data. All reports and data shall be adequate to enable the City to:
a. Meet current reporting requirements to CalRecycle, including but not limited to AB 939, AB 341, AB 1826, and SB 1383.
b. Monitor the individual SB 1383 compliance of the Contractor’s commercial/industrial and residential customers.
c. Evaluate progress toward the City’s waste diversion and climate goals. d. Evaluate customer service and complaints.
e. Evaluate customer billing and service information.

The Contractor may propose report formats that are responsive to the City’s objectives, and in a format compatible with the City’s computers and software, or any format reasonably specified by the City’s software company. The City and Contractor shall cooperate and discuss reasonable modifications to the format of reports submitted by the Contractor, should City request any modifications during the term. The Contractor shall submit all reports by electronic means. The City reserves the right to require Contractor to periodically transfer customer data to a City selected web-based software platform at no additional cost to City, subject to applicable law regarding consumer privacy protections and cybersecurity.

12.2.2 Quarterly Reports. Contractor shall submit quarterly reports required by this Agreement or applicable law within forty-five (45) calendar days after the end of each quarter. The City reserves the right to request the content of quarterly reports in a monthly format, in response to a request from CalRecycle, and Contractor shall submit the reports in alignment with the deadline for a request from CalRecycle. Quarterly reports shall include, at a minimum, the following information:
a. The amount in tons of material collected by the Contractor for the month, sorted by type of material (solid waste, recyclable materials, organics

Page 625 ends

21 | P a g e
waste, bulky waste, etc.) and type of customer (residential, commercial/industrial, etc.).
b. The number of tons taken during the month to each facility and where the tons were processed or disposed.
c. A summary of residential accounts customer information, including:
i. The number of customers subscribed to each cart or bin size. ii. The number of bulky waste collections performed during the month.
iii. A summary of the number of missed pickups.
iv. A list of delinquent accounts.
v. A summary of information recorded in the Contractor’s Complaint log.
d. A summary of commercial/industrial customer information, including for each type of customer:
i. Total number of commercial/industrial customers.
ii. Number of each type of account subject to (i.e. ‘covered’) AB 341 and AB 1826.
iii. Number of accounts compliant and non-compliant with SB 1383 via participation in Contractor’s recycling and organics waste programs.
iv. A list of all customers not in compliance with mandatory threecontainer service, in accordance with applicable law and SB 1383.
v. Number of customers with waivers by type of waiver (de minimis or physical space).
vi. The total number of containers disposed due to the observation of contamination.
vii. Number of annual hauler route reviews conducted during the

Page 626 ends

22 | P a g e
quarter, per Section 6.7.4.3.1, with a summary of the results. e. A summary of customers with industrial roll-off collection service information, including:
i. The number of loads hauled by type of customer (permanent, temporary, or construction and demolition waste).
ii. By material type.
f. A summary of contamination monitoring activities, including:
i. Results of route reviews performed during that quarter; ii. Results of waste evaluations or waste characterizations performed during that quarter, if performed by Contractor; iii. A list of all customers issued warning notices for contamination; and,
iv. A list of all customers assessed contamination fees, if applicable. g. Quarterly status of the Contractor’s public education and outreach activities; h. A narrative summary of any problems encountered (including scavenging) during the month and actions taken with recommendations for the City, as appropriate.
i. Complaints regarding non-compliance with SB 1383.
j. The City reserves the right to request additional reports from the Contractor as may be reasonably requested by CalRecycle or applicable law.

12.2.3 Annual Operational Reports.

A. General. In addition to the quarterly reporting requirements in Section 12.2.2 above, the Contractor shall provide an “Annual Report,” covering the most recently completed calendar year. The Annual Report is to be essentially in the form and content of the monthly reports, but shall also include:

1. Collection and Subscription Report.
a. A summary of all data provided in the tonnage report section, including

Page 627 ends

23 | P a g e
quarterly and annual totals and averages.
b. The type(s) of collection service(s) provided, a list of all hauler routes serviced, and a record of the addresses served on each hauler route. c. A summary of customer subscription data, including the number of accounts; the total number of customers enrolled with Contractor for service, listed separately by service level and container type (cart, bin, and roll-off box service), separately by residential customer, multi-family complex customer, and commercial/industrial customers, and separately for solid waste, recyclable materials, and organics waste;
d. A detailed list of residential customer, multi-family complexes, and commercial/industrial customer information, including solid waste, recyclable materials, and organics waste service levels, customer type, and customer service addresses reflecting customer service levels as of January 1 (for the year in which the report is submitted). e. The total number of waivers recommended by Contractor and approved by City in the year, including the customer name and address for each waiver, conducted pursuant to Section 61.
f. Recyclable materials tonnage recovered, by commodity, and processing residue tonnage disposed, listed separately by material type collected and solid waste, recyclable materials, and organics waste facility(ies) used.

2. Processing Facility Report.
a. Temporary Equipment or Operations Failure Waivers: If the Contractor is granted a processing facility temporary equipment or operational failure waiver, the Contractor shall include the following documents and information in accordance with Article 12 of the Existing Agreement:
i. The number of days the processing facility temporary equipment waiver or operation failure waiver was in effect.
ii. Copies of any notifications sent to the City pursuant to Article 12 of

Page 628 ends

24 | P a g e
the Existing Agreement, and copies of City notices to Contractor. iii. Documentation setting forth the date of issuance of the waiver, the timeframe for the waiver.
iv. A record of the tons of recyclable materials, organics waste, and/or solid waste redirected to an alternative facility or disposed of as a result of the facility waiver, recorded by collection vehicle or transfer vehicle number/load, date, and weight.
b. Quarantined Organics Waste: A record of all compliance agreements for quarantined organics waste that are disposed of, including the name of customer, date issued, location of final disposition, and the amount of quarantined organics waste that was required to be disposed at a landfill.

3. Public Education and Outreach Report.
a. A copy of all education and outreach materials provided to customers, or otherwise used for education and outreach efforts in accordance with Article 10 of the Agreement, including, but not limited to: flyers, brochures, newsletters, invoice messaging/billing inserts, and website and social media postings.
b. A record of the date and to whom the information was disseminated, or direct contact made, in the form of a list that includes: the customer’s name or account name, the type of education or outreach received; the distribution date, and the method of distribution.
c. The number of organics waste customers that received information and the type of education and outreach used.
d. For any mass distribution through mailings or bill inserts, the Contractor shall maintain a record of the date, a copy of the information distributed, and the type and number of accounts that received the information. e. A copy of electronic media, including the dates posted of social media posts, e-mail communications, or other electronic messages.

Page 629 ends

25 | P a g e

4. Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Report.
a. A summary of the total number of SB 1383 non-compliance complaints that were received and investigated, and the number of notices of violation issued based on investigation of those complaints.
b. The total number of Contractor route reviews conducted pursuant to Sections 6.7.4.3.1 and 7.8.1.3.1 of the Existing Agreement. c. Documentation demonstrating Contractor procured sufficient quantities of compost or mulch, to meet the City’s per capita annual recovered organic waste product procurement requirement contained in SB 1383 as required under Section 11.8 of this Agreement.

14. Section 22.6.1.1 (Service Component) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

Service Component. The Service Component comprises seventy-five percent (75%) of the overall rates. The Service Component shall be adjusted annually by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, series CUURS49ASA0, All items in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, all urban consumers, not seasonally adjusted, as published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), by calculating the average of the changes in the CPI between each month during the June to May period immediately preceding the date of the rate adjustment and the same month in the preceding year.

Notwithstanding the above, no annual maximum adjustment to the Service Component shall exceed a total of five percent (5%) for any given annual adjustment nor decreased (reduced more than zero percent (0%)). To the extent that a rate increase or decrease otherwise allowable is not granted due to this limitation, any excess above five percent (5%) or any decrease, as the case may be, shall be rolled over and applied to subsequent annual maximum adjustments of the Service Component until fully utilized.

Page 630 ends

26 | P a g e

15. Unaffected Provisions Remain in Full Force.

All provisions of the Existing Agreement except for those expressly amended by this Second Amendment, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

Page 631 ends

27 | P a g e
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Contractor have executed this Second Amendment as of the Effective Date.

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
ATTEST: By: _________
Title: ____________________________
CITY CLERK Date: ______________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________

CITY ATTORNEY
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a
Delaware corporation
By: _________
(Authorized Representative)
Title: ____________________________
Date: ___

Page 632 ends

EXHIBIT
LEVINE ACT/GC 84308 DISCLOSURE
California Government Code section 84308, commonly referred to as the Levine Act, prohibits any City of San Dimas Officer1(“Officer”) from taking part in any action related to a contract if the Officer received a political contribution totaling more than $500 within the previous twelve months, and for twelve months following the date a final decision concerning the contract has been made, from the person or company awarded the contract or their agent. The Levine Act also requires parties involved in such contracts to disclose any contributions made to the Officer.

The Levine Act does not apply to competitively bid, labor, personal employment contracts, contracts valued under $50,000, contracts between government agencies, or contracts where no party receives financial compensation. ☐ A. The Levine Act/GC 84308 DOES NOT apply to this Agreement. ☐ B. The Levine Act/GC 84308 does apply to this Agreement and the required disclosure is as follows:

Current Officers can be located on the City of San Dimas’ websites below:
• Mayor & Council - Welcome to San Dimas, CA (sandimasca.gov) • Planning Commissioners – Welcome to San Dimas, CA (sandimasca.gov) The party making this certification is responsible for determining whether a recipient of a political contribution is an Officer prior to answering the following questions:

1. Have you or your company, or any participant or agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions totaling more than $500 to any Officer in the 12 months preceding the date you submitted your proposal, the date you completed this form, or the anticipated date of any Council action related to this Agreement?
YES:☐ If yes, which Officer(s): Click or tap here to enter text.

NO: ☐
1 “Officer” means any elected or appointed officer of an agency, any alternate to an elected or appointed officer of an agency, and any candidate for elective office in an agency, other than a city attorney or county counsel providing legal advice to the agency who does not have the authority to make a final decision in the proceeding. (GC § 84308(a)(4).) The term “officer” is further defined 2 Cal. Code Regs. Section 18438.1, which states: An officer of an agency includes only those persons who make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence a decision in the license, permit, or entitlement for use proceeding, or who exercise authority or budgetary control over the agency or officers who may do so, and: (1) Serve in an elected position, including an official appointed to an elected position due to an interim vacancy or an election otherwise canceled because the official was the sole candidate for the position; (2) Serve as a member of a board or commission; (3) Serve as the chief executive of a state agency, or county, city or district of any kind; or (4) Have decision making authority with respect to the proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use and is also a candidate for elected office or has been a candidate for elective office in the 12 months prior to the proceeding.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 633 ends

2 1/22/2025

2. Do you or your company, or any participant or agent on behalf of you or your company, anticipate or plan to make political contributions totaling more than $500 to any Officer in the 12 months following the finalization of this Agreement or any Council action related to this Agreement?
YES:☐ If yes, which Officer(s): Click or tap here to enter text.

NO: ☐
Answering yes to either question above may not preclude the City of San Dimas from entering into or taking any subsequent action related to the Agreement.

However, it may preclude the identified Officer(s) from participating in any actions related to the Agreement.

By signing below, you certify you also agree to disclose to the City any future contributions made to Officers by you or your agent(s) after the date of signing this disclosure form, and within 12 months following the approval, renewal, or extension of the Agreement.

I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND
CORRECT.

Signature: Date Signed:

Print Name:

Title:

Company
Contribution Disclosure
Date Amount Recipient
06/3/2025
James W. Carson Attorney and Outside Counsel Waste Management & Affiliated Entities

Page 634 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Taylor Galindo, Assistant Planner
Subject: Introduce Ordinance 1328 Approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01, Amending Title 18-Chapter 18.40 Affordable Housing Overlay Zone, to Modify the Boundary Lines of Affordable Housing Overly Zone No. 2 (AHO-2). ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01 proposes to amend Chapter 18.40, Affordable Housing Overlay Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code (SDMC) by modifying the boundary lines for one (1) of the two (2) overlay zones, Affordable Housing Overlay Zone 2 (AHO-2). The purpose of the two (2) Affordable Housing Overlay Zones (AHO No’s 1 & 2) is to designate certain areas in the City as suitable for higher-density residential uses alongside existing permitted uses in the underlying zone. These overlays were created as part of the site selection for the 4th & 5th Housing Element Cycles.

On September 27, 2022, the current cycle of the Housing Element (6th) was adopted and designated a portion of Affordable Housing Overlay Zone No. 2 as a new Housing Element Site No. 5. In addition, on September 24, 2024, the City adopted the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP), amending the land use designation of these sites from creative Growth Area 3A & 3B, Industrial (M-1), and Public/Semi-Public to Downtown Specific Plan-Transit Village.

Following the adoption of the 6th Cycle Housing Element and the Downtown Specific Plan, the next step is to adjust the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone No. 2 boundaries. This involves removing sites included in Housing Element Site No. 5 while retaining existing sites within the overlay zone not part of Site No. 5. This amendment will provide clarity and maintain consistency between all three (3) documents.

Page 635 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 2
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025

RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council:
• Introduce Ordinance 1328 approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01, a request to amend Title 18 of the San Dimas Municipal Zoning Code – Chapter 1840 Affordable Housing Overlay Zone, to modify the boundary lines of Affordable Housing Overlay Zone

2. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
The 2008 (4th Cycle) Housing Element set objectives to improve affordable housing for lower income groups by rezoning 7.4 acres to accommodate 223 units at a minimum density of 30 units per acre, aligning with state standards (Government Code Section 65583.2 (c) (3) (B) (iv)). On January 22, 2013, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1215, approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 12-06, which added Chapter 18.44 to the San Dimas Municipal Code. The amendment established the Multi-Family (MF)-30 Zone with the intent of satisfying the aforementioned housing objectives.

On February 12, 2013, Ordinance 1217 was adopted, approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 12-08, which established Chapter 18.40, Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. This chapter was established with the intent to protect existing properties in the newly established MF30 zones from non-conforming status and accommodate parcels that were not immediately ready to meet housing goals. Chapter 18.40 includes two overlay zones: AHO-1 and AHO-2 (Figures 1- 2) that were created through Zone Change 12-01 and Zone Change 12-02 respectively.

Page 636 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 3
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025

Figure 1: AHO-1 is geographically bounded by Monte Vista Avenue, Allen Avenue, San Dimas Avenue, and the 210 Freeway.

Figure 1: AHO-2 is geographically bounded by San Dimas Avenue, Arrow Highway, Walnut Avenue, and the A Line railroad right-of-way

Page 637 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 4
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
On September 27, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-50, approving General Plan Amendment 22-0001, adopting the 6th Cycle Housing Element for 2021-2029. With this adoption, 11 of the 23 parcels of AHO-2 were designated as Site No. 5 in the Housing Element, raising the proposed density to 35-45 dwelling units per acre (for parcels 8390-018-023, -040, -045, -046, - 048, -028, -197, -066, -907, -908, and -909.) The remaining 12 parcels are part of The Grove Station and The Village Walk Homeowner Associations (Figure 3) and were not included in Site No. 5.

Figure 2: Grove Station HOA (in Green) and Village Walk HOA (in pink) - not included in Housing Element Site No. 5 (in orange) but part of the Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO-2).

The current cycle of the Housing Element prescribes a proposed density for Site No. 5 Walnut/Arrow as 35-45 dwelling units/acre (See Attachment 2).

On October 8, 2024, the City Council approved Ordinance 1312, Zone Change 24-02, amending the zoning designation of various parcels as part of the Downtown Specific Plan approval.

The subject sites were rezoned from Creative Growth Area 3A & 3B, Industrial (M-1), and Public/Semi-Public to Downtown Specific Plan-Transit Village (DTSP-TV) (Figures 4 & 5).

Page 638 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 5
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
Figure 4: Downtown Specific Plan Zoning Map; AHO-2 is the area outlined in neon yellow.

On April 17, 2025, this item was continued by the Planning Commission at the request of staff to a specific date of May 15, 2025. The proposed amendment for the April Planning Commission meeting included the deletion of AHO-2. However, following further investigation and consultation with the City Attorney, it was determined that AHO-2 could not be deleted in its entirety and that its boundary needed to be modified to prevent downzoning of the portion of the AHO-2 parcels not included as part of Housing Element Site No. 5.

On May 15, 2025, the Planning Commission considered the proposed ordinance. The Commission did not have any concerns with the proposed amendment, nor was there any public input at the meeting. Subsequently, the Commission voted 5-0 to adopt Resolution PC 1691 recommending approval of MCTA 25-01 to the City Council (See Attachment 3)

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Staff is requesting to amend Chapter 18.40 of the San Dimas Municipal Code by modifying the boundaries of AHO-2. The 6th Cycle Housing Element indicates that portions of Chapter 18.40 will no longer be necessary after its adoption due to increased density incentives provided by State law and updated density requirements in the Housing Element. The proposed revision aims to ensure clarity and accuracy, as the AHO-2 site has been rezoned under the DTSP and only a portion of the AHO-2 site has been incorporated into Housing Element Site No. 5. This rezoning reflects a change in allowable density; AHO-2 requires a minimum of 30 dwelling units per acre,

Page 639 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 6
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
while the current 6th Cycle Housing Element stipulates a density range of 35-45 dwelling units per acre only for the parcels that have been included as part of Housing Element Site No. 5. The density numbers outlined in the Housing Element were established with the goal of meeting the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 1,248 units for the 6th housing cycle, as set by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The remainder of the site, not included within Housing Element Site No.5, includes the northwestern portion, which has been developed and includes the Grove Station and Village Walk Homeowners Associations.

These developments were completed in 2013 and will not be redeveloped in the foreseeable future. The prescribed density for the Transit Village of DTSP is a maximum of 30 dwelling units per acre (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Summary of Development Standards - Downtown Specific Plan Staff recommends modifying the boundaries of AHO-2 to ensure that parcels not included in Housing Element Site No. 5 remain with the designated overlay. The proposed objective is to maintain the development standards of AHO-2 for parcels outside of Housing Element Site No. 5, as the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) sets a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre, while the overlay requires a minimum density of 30 dwelling units per acre. Although redevelopment of these parcels is not anticipated in the foreseeable future, it is critical to modify the boundary lines rather than eliminate the overlay entirely to preserve higher potential densities and prevent downzoning.

An amendment will also need to be made to the DTSP to clarify the overlay boundaries for the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone 2. This amendment will include updating the Zoning and Land Use Maps within the document and the Summary of Development Standards table in Chapter 4.

The proposed modified boundary lines of AHO-2 can be seen in Figure 6. The proposed AHO-2 will be exclusively applied to the following assessor parcel numbers: 8390-018-255, -207, -215, - 230, -236, -245, -181, -044, -070, -092 and 8390-027-003, -011.

Page 640 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 7
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
Figure 6: The proposed revised AHO-2 boundary lines. The site completed development in 2013 and is now the Grove Station and Village Walk Homeowner Associations.

ALTERNATIVES
There are no proposed alternatives for this request.

Page 641 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 8
For the Meeting of June 10, 2025
Respectfully submitted,
Taylor Galindo
Assistant Planner
Attachments:

1. Ordinance 1328

2. Housing Element Sites Inventory List, Site No. 5

3. Planning Commission Staff Report, PC Resolution 1691, and Draft Minutes - May 15, 2025

Page 642 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE 1328

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS

ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT
AMENDMENT 25-01, WHICH AMENDS TITLE 18 - ZONING, CHAPTER 18.40

AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, TO MODIFY THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE 2 (AHO-2).

WHEREAS, an Amendment to the San Dimas Municipal Code has been duly initiated by the City of San Dimas; and
WHEREAS, the Amendment is described as an amendment to Title 18-Zoning, Chapter

18.40 Affordable Housing Overlay Zone, to modify the boundary lines of the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone 2; and
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-50 approving General Plan Amendment 22-001, adopting the 6th Cycle Housing Element for 2021- 2029 ; and
WHEREAS, on October 8, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1312 - Zone Change 24-02 and MCTA 24-07 amending land use designations of various parcels as part of the Downtown Specific Plan zone and creating a Downtown Specific Plan Chapter; and WHEREAS, the 6th Cycle Housing Element, adopted September 27, 2022, acknowledged the necessity to reevaluate the affordable housing overlay; and WHEREAS, on May 15, 2025, the Planning Commission heard evidence and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01 to the City Council; and WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the public hearing on the matter and that public hearing was held on June 10, 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., with all testimony received being made a part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met for the consideration of whether the project will have a significant effect on the environment. It has been determined that this action is not a project under CEQA, as there will be no direct physical or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the evidence received at the hearing, and for the reasons discussed by the Commissioners at the hearing, the Planning Commission now finds as follows:

A. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value, precedent or be detrimental to the area.

The proposed amendment will modify the boundary lines of the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone No. 2 (AHO-2) from Chapter 18.40 of the San Dimas Municipal Zoning Code to clarify proposed density requirements. AHO-2 is currently bounded by San Dimas Avenue, Arrow Highway, Walnut Avenue, and the A Line railroad right-of-way, encompassing 23 parcels. Under AHO-2, these parcels have a proposed density of 30 dwelling units per acre.

Page 643 ends

Ordinance 1328 Page 2
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01
On September 27, 2022, the City adopted the sixth cycle of the General Plan’s Housing Element, which created a Housing Element Site Overlay. Of the 23 parcels in AHO-2, 11 are part of Site No. 5 in the Housing Element. Site No. 5 includes a prescribed density of 35-45 dwelling units per acre (for parcels 8390-018-023, -040, - 045, -046, -028, -048, -197, -066, -907, -908, and -909.) and allows multi-family developments designed to be compatible with the existing neighborhood, including the Grove Station and Village Walk HOAs. Furthermore, the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) was adopted on October 8, 2024, which rezoned the site as part of the DTSP’s Transit Village and introduced new development standards, including a proposed density for the 12 parcels that were not identified as part of Housing Element Site No.

5. The proposed modification of the boundary lines for AHO-2 will ensure that the northwestern portion of the site (Grove Station and Village Walk) remains under the affordable housing overlay. The remainder of the site is designated as Housing Element Site No. 5 in the 6th Cycle Housing Element. Therefore, there are no adverse impacts on the identified site.

B. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment will further the public health, safety, and general welfare.

The proposed amendment aligns Title 18 with the City’s Downtown Specific Plan and General Plan to address the density requirements for Housing Element Site No. 5. and the parcels abutting Site No. 5. Currently, the zoning of the Transit Village allows for a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre, prescribed in the Downtown Specific Plan, and a minimum of 30 dwelling units per acre under Chapter 18.40 (AHO). By modifying the boundary lines of the AHO-2 to only encompass the parcels that are outside of H.E. Site No. 5, these sites will allow for this site to be properly redeveloped with the right density level. (Min. 30 U/A) The DTSP will also be adjusted to incorporate the requirement of the AHO-2 to the effect parcels keeping consistency with all three documents.

The amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance are intended to provide clarity on this increased density requirement, ensuring that it supports the city's broader objectives, such as compatibility with surrounding areas and maintaining public health and safety. The proposed amendment will clarify density requirements and enhance public welfare by expanding housing opportunities in San Dimas.

C. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan.

The proposed amendments are consistent with applicable zoning by ensuring the amendments will be consistent with the following goals of the General Plan:

Housing Element
a. Goal Statement HE-2: Opportunities for well-designed and appropriate housing that is diverse in type, location, affordability, and tenure and

Page 644 ends

Ordinance 1328 Page 3
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01
that meets the full spectrum of current and future housing needs in San Dimas.
b. Goal Statement HE-3: Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove or minimize governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing.

Furthermore, the 2021-2029 (6th Cycle) Housing Element acknowledged the necessity to reevaluate the Affordable Housing Overlay after the adoption of the document due to increased density incentives provided by state law and updated density requirements in the Housing Element. The proposed revision aims to ensure clarity and accuracy, as 11 of the 23 parcels of AHO-2 have been incorporated into Housing Element Site No. 5, and the entire site has been rezoned under the Downtown Specific Plan. Modifying the boundary lines of the AHO-2 will to the parcels outside of HE site No. 5 will keep their density level consistent with the General Plan’s Housing Element.

Land Use
c. Goal Statement L-6: Revitalize and improve Downtown as a community focus.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. ADOPTION. Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01 amending Chapter 18.40 Affordable Housing Overlay Zone to modify the boundary lines of Affordable Housing Overlay Zone 2, as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, is hereby adopted.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 3. CEQA DETERMINATION. The City Council hereby finds and determines that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this ordinance may have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Thus, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 1506 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Page 645 ends

Ordinance 1328 Page 4
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01
published, the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas this 24th day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________ ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk Jeff Malawy, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )§

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, Debra Black, City Clerk of the City of San Dimas, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance 1328 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas on the 10th day of June, 2025, and thereafter passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 24th day of June, 2025. It has been published and posted pursuant to law.
___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Page 646 ends

Ordinance 1328 Page 5
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01

EXHIBIT A
*New text changes are in Blue and Underlined
*Deleted text is in Red and Strikethrough
CHAPTER 18.40

AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE
§ 18.40.010. Purpose.

The purpose of the affordable housing overlay zone is to designate certain areas as suitable for higher density residential uses in addition to any uses permitted and existing in the underlying zone. It is intended to allow the additional higher density residential to be mixed with existing nonresidential uses while maintaining appropriate development standards for all uses to ensure that such development is compatible with contiguous uses, to encourage wellplanned neighborhoods through creative and imaginative site planning, to provide opportunities at a density deemed appropriate to accommodate lower income households by Section 65583.2(c)(3)(B)(iv) of the Planning and Zoning Law and to ensure integrated design and unified control of design.
(Ord. 1217 § 1, 2013)
§ 18.40.020. Uses permitted.

All uses are permitted or conditionally permitted in the MF-30 zone. The affordable housing overlay zone does not prohibit any uses permitted or conditionally permitted in the underlying zone.
(Ord. 1217 § 1, 2013)
§ 18.40.030. Affordable housing overlay zones designated.

Affordable housing overlays shall be designated on the official zoning map, as follows:

A. Whenever an affordable housing overlay designation is placed on a property or properties, those properties shall be subject to the provisions of the specified affordable housing overlay zone and any additional standards set forth herein in addition to the provisions of the underlying zone.

B. Method of Designation. The abbreviation "AHO," designating affordable housing, shall be appended to the base zoning district on the official zoning map. In addition a number may be attached to the overlay zone referring to any special standards developed in this chapter which may be applicable to any created affordable housing overlay zone (Example: a commercialhighway zone would show on the official zoning map as C-H (AHO-1)). (Ord. 1217 § 1, 2013)
§ 18.40.040. Development standards.

A. Existing Uses. All existing uses shall continue to be subject to the development standards in the underlying zone.

B. New Higher Density Residential Use. All new higher density residential uses shall be subject to the standards set forth in Chapter 18.44, Multiple-Family Thirty Units Per Acre (MF30) Zone. (Ord. 1217 § 1, 2013)
§ 18.40.050. Affordable housing overlay zone created.

Each affordable housing overlay zone created herein may have differing goals and objectives to facilitate implementation of the goals of the housing element depending upon the size, location, number of properties, ownership patterns, nature of existing uses and other relevant factors.

Page 647 ends

Ordinance 1328 Page 6
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01
A. Affordable housing overlay zone No. 1 (AHO-1) is created as follows:

1. Geographic Area. Bounded by Monte Vista Avenue on the west, Allen Avenue on the south, San Dimas Avenue on the east and the 210 Freeway on the north and as further depicted on the official zoning map.

2. Housing Goal. To provide a minimum of 3.83 acres for development at a minimum density of thirty dwelling units per acre to accommodate a minimum of seventy-five dwelling units.

3. Change in Existing Use. In the event that the existing seven and three-fourths acre site or any portion of the site exceeding one acre in size is no longer needed for public use, no change from the existing use to any other use shall be permitted until said property is evaluated for higher density residential use.

4. Standards of Review. Prior to any change in use as described in subsection (A)(3), an evaluation of the suitability of the available property shall be performed to assess the following:
a. Location of available land and its compatibility with any property being held for continued public use.
b. Availability of access to public street.
c. Availability of utilities.
d. Compatibility with uses on nearby properties.
e. Ability to accommodate the minimum density of thirty dwelling units per acre. f. Any environmental consideration related to soils, adjacency of freeway or other environmental considerations.

5. Review Procedure. The evaluation shall be reviewed by the planning commission and city council to determine if the available property shall be limited to new development of higher density residential housing. The planning commission and city council may enter into agreements, impose conditions, change the underlying zoning or take other actions deemed necessary to facilitate the higher density housing development opportunity.

B. Affordable housing overlay zone No. 2 (AHO-2) is created as follows:

1. Geographic Area. Bounded by San Dimas Avenue on the west, Arrow Highway on the south, Walnut Avenue on the east and the Gold Line railroad right-of-way on the north and as further depicted on the official zoning map. The boundary lines for AHO-2 are indicated in Exhibit A: AHO-2 Boundary Line Map. The Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) within the boundary lines of AHO-2 include the following: 8390-018-255, -207, -215, -230, -236, - 245, -044, -070, -092, -181, 8390-027-003, and -011. All aforementioned APNs are located within the following parameters:
a. South of the Metro A line and;
b. East of South San Dimas Avenue and;
c. North of APNs 8390-018-040, -023, & -048; which are directly abutting East Arrow Highway

Page 648 ends

Ordinance 1328 Page 7
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01
Exhibit A: Affordable Housing Overlay Zone 2 Boundary Line Map.

2. Housing Goal. To provide a minimum of 3.3 acres for development at a minimum density of thirty dwelling units per acre to accommodate a minimum of one hundred dwelling units.

3. Change in Existing Use. When any existing parcel or group of parcels which can be assembled into a minimum site area of one acre becomes available for development for a new use, no change from the existing use to any other use shall be permitted until said property is evaluated for higher density residential use. The change of use does not apply to changing tenants in existing buildings, minor alterations to existing building, or other nonsubstantive changes to existing buildings or improvements.

4. Standards of Review. Prior to any change in use as described in subsection (B)(3), an evaluation of the suitability of the available property shall be performed to assess the following:
a. Location of available land and its capability, including the timing thereof, to be assembled with adjacent properties to accommodate a minimum parcel size of one acre. The ability of a parcel to accommodate an interim use pending assembly may also be considered.

Page 649 ends

Ordinance 1328 Page 8
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01
b. Availability of access to public street.
c. Availability of utilities.
d. Compatibility with uses on nearby properties.
e. Ability to accommodate the minimum density of thirty dwelling units per acre. f. Any environmental consideration related to soils, adjacency of railroad or other environmental considerations.

Page 650 ends

City of San Dimas | General Plan
2021 - 2029 Housing Element A-5
Figure A-5 Walnut/Arrow Site
Site #5: Walnut/Arrow
Site #5 is a 11.5-acre group of 10 parcels located directly adjacent to the Gold Line station, currently under construction. The site includes a pet service, offices, storage, auto repair, and 2.3-acre city yard. The site is underutilized given its modest improvement-land value ratio and Metro interest in the site. There are no known environmental or infrastructure constraints at the site. The site is primed for mixed use; two mixed use projects are within 300 feet of the subject site. To facilitate development, the City will redesignate the site for mixed uses, allow a density of 35-45 dus/ac, and accommodate 242 units. The prior housing element included this site under the Affordable Housing Overlay. The City owns 20% of the site and one property owner owns 10% of the site and has expressed interest in consolidation. Further consolidation would create the most cohesive project.

Program #5 addresses the statutes required to be addressed for this site.

Site Specifics Property Specifics
General Plan: Commercial Building constructed: varied
Current Zoning: M-1 / Public/Semi Public Building/Lot Ratio: 19% Assess. Parcel: 8390-018-023, 040, -045-
046, -027, -197, -066; and -907, -908, -909 Assessed Imp/Land Ratio: <0.84 Parcel Acreage: 11.5 acres Developer Interest: Some
Ownership: 8 owners Anticipated Use: Mixed Uses
Current Uses: Storage, City Yard,
Office, gas station, auto repair, etc. Proposed Density: 35-45 du/acre Existing Mixed Use
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 651 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Chair and Members of Planning Commission
For the Meeting of May 15, 2025
From: Luis Torrico, Director of Community Development
Prepared by: Taylor Galindo, Assistant Planner
Subject: Continued from the April 17, 2025, Meeting
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01, Consideration and discussion of a City-initiated Municipal Code Text Amendment of Title 18, Chapter 18.40 Affordable Housing Overlay Zone, modification of the boundary lines for Affordable Housing Overly Zone No. 2 (AHO-2).
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01, proposes to amend Chapter 18.40 Affordable Housing Overlay Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code (SDMC) by modifying the boundary lines for one of the two overlay zones, Affordable Housing Overlay Zone 2 (AHO-2). The purpose of the two Affordable Housing Overlay Zones (AHO No’s 1 & 2) is to designate certain areas in the City as suitable for higher-density residential uses alongside existing permitted uses in the underlying zone. These overlays were created as part of the site selection for the 4th & 5 th
Housing Element Cycles. On September 27, 2022, the current cycle of the Housing Element (6th) was adopted and designated a portion of Affordable Housing Overlay Zone No. 2 as a new Housing Element Site No. 5. In addition, on September 24, 2024, the City adopted the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP), amending the land use designation of these sites from Creative Growth Area 3A & 3B, Industrial (M-1), and Public/Semi-Public to Downtown Specific Plan-Transit Village. Following the adoption of the 6th Cycle Housing Element and the Downtown Specific Plan, the next step is to adjust the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone No. 2 boundaries. This involves removing sites included in Housing Element Site No. 5 while retaining existing sites within the overlay zone not part of Site No. 5. This amendment will provide clarity and maintain consistency between all three documents.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PC-1694 recommending approval to the City Council of Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 652 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 2
For the Meeting of May 15, 2025

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
The 2008 (4th Cycle) Housing Element set objectives to improve affordable housing for lowerincome groups by rezoning 7.4 acres to accommodate 223 units at a minimum density of 30 units per acre, aligning with state standards (Government Code Section 65583.2 (c) (3) (B) (iv)). On January 22, 2013, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1215, approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 12-06, which added Chapter 18.44 to the San Dimas Municipal Code. The amendment established the Multi-Family (MF)-30 Zone with the intent of satisfying the aforementioned housing objectives.

On February 12, 2013, Ordinance 1217 was adopted, approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 12-08, which established Chapter 18.40; Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. This chapter was established with the intent to protect existing properties in the newly established MF30 zones from non-conforming status and accommodate parcels that were not immediately ready to meet housing goals. Chapter 18.40 includes two overlay zones: AHO-1 and AHO-2 (Figures 1- 2) that were created through Zone Change 12-01) and Zone Change 12-02 respectively.

Figure 1: AHO-1 is geographically bounded by Monte Vista Avenue, Allen Avenue, San Dimas Avenue, and the 210 Freeway.

Page 653 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 3
For the Meeting of May 15, 2025
Figure 2: AHO-2 is geographically bounded by San Dimas Avenue, Arrow Highway, Walnut Avenue, and the A Line railroad right-of-way
On September 27, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-50, approving General Plan Amendment 22-0001, adopting the 6th Cycle Housing Element for 2021-2029. With this adoption, 11 of the 23 parcels of AHO-2 were designated as Site No. 5 in the Housing Element, raising the proposed density to 35-45 dwelling units per acre (for parcels 8390-018-023, -040, -045, -046, -048, -028, -197, -066, -907, -908, and -909.) The remaining 12 parcels are part of The Grove Station and The Village Walk Homeowner Associations (Figure 3), and were not included in Site No. 5.

Figure 3: Grove Station HOA (in Green) and Village Walk HOA (in pink) - not included in Housing Element Site No. 5 (in orange) but part of the Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO-2).

Page 654 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 4
For the Meeting of May 15, 2025
The current cycle of the Housing Element prescribes a proposed density for Site No. 5 Walnut/Arrow as 35-45 dwelling units/acre (See Attachment 2).

On October 8, 2024, the City Council approved Ordinance 1312, Zone Change 24-02, amending the zoning designation of various parcels as part of the Downtown Specific Plan approval. The subject sites were rezoned from Creative Growth Area 3A & 3B, Industrial (M-1), and Public/SemiPublic to Downtown Specific Plan-Transit Village (DTSP-TV) (Figures 4 & 5).

Figure 4: Downtown Specific Plan Zoning Map; AHO-2 is the area outlined in neon yellow.

Page 655 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 5
For the Meeting of May 15, 2025
portion of the AHO-2 site has been incorporated into Housing Element Site No. 5. This rezoning reflects a change in allowable density; AHO-2 requires a minimum of 30 dwelling units per acre, while the current 6th Cycle Housing Element stipulates a density range of 35-45 dwelling units per acre only for the parcels that have been included as part of Housing Element Site No. 5. The density numbers outlined in the Housing Element were established with the goal of meeting the planning target of 1,248 units for the 6th housing cycle, as set by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The remainder of the site, not included within Housing Element Site No.5, includes the northwestern portion, which has been developed and includes the Grove Station and Village Walk Homeowners Associations. These developments were completed in 2013 and will not be redeveloped in the foreseeable future. The prescribed density for the Transit Village of DTSP is a maximum of 30 dwelling units per acre (Figure 5).

Page 656 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 6
For the Meeting of May 15, 2025
Figure 6: The proposed revised AHO-2 boundary lines. The site completed development in 2013 and is now the Grove Station and Village Walk Homeowner Associations.

ALTERNATIVES
There are no proposed alternatives for this request.

Respectfully submitted,
Taylor Galindo
Assistant Planner

Page 657 ends

MCTA 25-01 Page 7
For the Meeting of May 15, 2025
Attachments:

1. Resolution PC 1694

2. Housing Element Sites Inventory List, Site No. 5

Page 658 ends

RESOLUTION PC-1694

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, RECOMMENDING TO THE

CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT
AMENDMENT 25-01, WHICH AMENDS TITLE 18 - ZONING, CHAPTER

18.40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, TO MODIFY THE

BOUNDARY LINES OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY
ZONE 2 (AHO-2).

WHEREAS, an Amendment to the San Dimas Municipal Code has been duly initiated by the City of San Dimas; and
WHEREAS, the Amendment is described as an amendment to Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.40 Affordable Housing Overlay Zone, to modify the boundary lines of the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone 2; and
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 2022- 50 approving General Plan Amendment 22-001, adopting the 6th Cycle Housing Element for 2021-2029 ; and
WHEREAS, on October 8, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1312 - Zone Change 24-02 and MCTA 24-07 amending land use designations of various parcels as part of the Downtown Specific Plan zone and creating a Downtown Specific Plan Chapter; and
WHEREAS, the 6th Cycle Housing Element, adopted September 27, 2022, acknowledged the necessity to reevaluate the affordable housing overlay; and WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the public hearing on the matter and that public hearing was held on May 15, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., with all testimony received being made a part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met for the consideration of whether the project will have a significant effect on the environment. It has been determined that this action is not a project under CEQA, as there will be no direct physical or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the evidence received at the hearing, and for the reasons discussed by the Commissioners at the hearing, the Planning Commission now finds as follows:

A. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value, precedent or be detrimental to the area.

Page 659 ends

RESOLUTION PC-1694 Page 2
the A Line railroad right-of-way, encompassing 23 parcels. Under AHO-2, these parcels have a proposed density of 30 dwelling units per acre.

On September 27, 2022, the City adopted the sixth cycle of the General Plan’s Housing Element, which created a Housing Element Site Overlay. Of the 23 parcels in AHO-2, 11 are part of Site No. 5 in the Housing Element. Site No. 5 includes a prescribed density of 35-45 dwelling units per acre (for parcels 8390- 018-023, -040, -045, -046, -028, -048, -197, -066, -907, -908, and -909.) and allows multi-family developments designed to be compatible with the existing neighborhood, including the Grove Station and Village Walk HOAs.

Furthermore, the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) was adopted on October 8, 2024, which rezoned the site as part of the DTSP’s Transit Village and introduced new development standards, including a proposed density for the 12 parcels that were not identified as part of Housing Element Site No. 5. The proposed modification of the boundary lines for AHO-2 will ensure that the northwestern portion of the site (Grove Station and Village Walk) remains under the affordable housing overlay. The remainder of the site is designated as Housing Element Site No. 5 in the 6th Cycle Housing Element. Therefore, there are no adverse impacts on the identified site.

B. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment will further the public health, safety, and general welfare.

The proposed amendment aligns Title 18 with the City’s Downtown Specific Plan and General Plan to address the density requirements for Housing Element Site No. 5. and the parcels abutting Site No. 5. Currently, the zoning of the Transit Village allows for a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre, prescribed in the Downtown Specific Plan, and a minimum of 30 dwelling units per acre under Chapter 18.40 (AHO). By modifying the boundary lines of the AHO-2 to only encompasses the parcels that are outside of H.E. Site No. 5 will allow these sites to be properly redeveloped with the right density level. (Min. 30 U/A) The DTSP will also be adjusted to incorporate the requirement of the AHO-2 to the effect parcels keeping consistency with all three documents.

Page 660 ends

RESOLUTION PC-1694 Page 3
C. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan.

The proposed amendments are consistent with applicable zoning by ensuring the amendments will be consistent with the following goals of the General Plan:

Housing Element
a. Goal Statement HE-2: Opportunities for well-designed and appropriate housing that is diverse in type, location,
affordability, and tenure and that meets the full spectrum of current and future housing needs in San Dimas.
b. Goal Statement HE-3: Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove or minimize governmental and
nongovernmental constraints to the maintenance,
improvement, and development of housing.

Land Use
c. Goal Statement L-6: Revitalize and improve Downtown as a community focus.

Page 661 ends

RESOLUTION PC-1694 Page 4

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-01 as set forth in the Attached Exhibit A.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, the 15th day of May, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

RECUSE:
_____________________________
David A. Bratt, Chairman
San Dimas Planning Commission
ATTEST:
________________________________________
Kimberly Neustice, Senior Administrative Analyst

Page 662 ends

RESOLUTION PC-1694 Page 5
Attachment A
*New text changes are in Blue and Underlined
*Deleted text is in Red and Strikethrough
CHAPTER 18.40

AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY
ZONE
§ 18.40.010. Purpose.

The purpose of the affordable housing overlay zone is to designate certain areas as suitable for higher density residential uses in addition to any uses permitted and existing in the underlying zone. It is intended to allow the additional higher density residential to be mixed with existing nonresidential uses while maintaining appropriate development standards for all uses to ensure that such development is compatible with contiguous uses, to encourage well-planned neighborhoods through creative and imaginative site planning, to provide opportunities at a density deemed appropriate to accommodate lower income households by Section 65583.2(c)(3)(B)(iv) of the Planning and Zoning Law and to ensure integrated design and unified control of design. (Ord. 1217 § 1, 2013)
§ 18.40.020. Uses permitted.

Affordable housing overlays shall be designated on the official zoning map, as follows:

B. Method of Designation. The abbreviation "AHO," designating affordable housing, shall be appended to the base zoning district on the official zoning map. In addition a number may be attached to the overlay zone referring to any special standards developed in this chapter which may be applicable to any created affordable housing overlay zone (Example: a commercial-highway zone would show on the official zoning map as C-H (AHO-1)).
(Ord. 1217 § 1, 2013)
§ 18.40.040. Development standards.

A. Existing Uses. All existing uses shall continue to be subject to the development standards in the underlying zone.

B. New Higher Density Residential Use. All new higher density residential uses shall be subject to the standards set forth in Chapter 18.44, Multiple-Family Thirty Units Per Acre (MF-30) Zone.
(Ord. 1217 § 1, 2013)
§ 18.40.050. Affordable housing overlay zone created.

Each affordable housing overlay zone created herein may have differing goals and objectives to facilitate implementation of the goals of the housing element depending

Page 663 ends

RESOLUTION PC-1694 Page 6
upon the size, location, number of properties, ownership patterns, nature of existing uses and other relevant factors.

A. Affordable housing overlay zone No. 1 (AHO-1) is created as follows:

2. Housing Goal. To provide a minimum of 3.83 acres for development at a minimum density of thirty dwelling units per acre to accommodate a minimum of seventy-five dwelling units.

3. Change in Existing Use. In the event that the existing seven and threefourths acre site or any portion of the site exceeding one acre in size is no longer needed for public use, no change from the existing use to any other use shall be permitted until said property is evaluated for higher density residential use.

4. Standards of Review. Prior to any change in use as described in subsection (A)(3), an evaluation of the suitability of the available property shall be performed to assess the following:
a. Location of available land and its compatibility with any property being held for continued public use.
b. Availability of access to public street.
c. Availability of utilities.
d. Compatibility with uses on nearby properties.
e. Ability to accommodate the minimum density of thirty dwelling units per acre.
f. Any environmental consideration related to soils, adjacency of freeway or other environmental considerations.

B. Affordable housing overlay zone No. 2 (AHO-2) is created as follows:

1. Geographic Area. Bounded by San Dimas Avenue on the west, Arrow Highway on the south, Walnut Avenue on the east and the Gold Line railroad right-of-way on the north and as further depicted on the official zoning map. The boundary lines for AHO-2 are indicated in Exhibit A: AHO-2 Boundary Line Map. The Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) within the boundary lines of AHO-2 include the following:
8390-018-255, -207, -215, -230, -236, -245, -044, -070, -092, -181, 8390-027-003, and -011. All aforementioned APNs are located within the following parameters:
a. South of the Metro A line and;
b. East of South San Dimas Avenue and;
c. North of APNs 8390-018-040, -023, & -048; which are directly abutting East Arrow Highway

Page 664 ends

San Dimas City CouncilJune 10, 2025

San Dimas City Council
June 10, 2025