San Dimas City Council
September 9, 2025

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2025 7:00 PM
SAN DIMAS COUNCIL CHAMBER
245 EAST BONITA AVENUE
A public agenda packet is available for review on the City’s website  www.sandimasca.gov or by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected].

Members of the public may observe the City Council meeting live on the City of San Dimas website at www.sandimasca.gov or on KWST Channel 3. To view from the website, select the Watch City Council Meetings blue button from the home page.
7:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Emmett Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Weber, Councilmember Rachel Bratakos, Councilmember Eric Nakano, Councilmember Ryan A. Vienna
CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Members of the audience are invited to address the City Council on any item on this agenda or not on this agenda. Public comment will not be taken during each individual agenda item, except for public hearing items. Comments on public hearing items will be heard when that item is scheduled for discussion. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the legislative body is prohibited from engaging in discussion on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. However, your concerns may be referred to staff or set for discussion at a later date. Each speaker will be limited to speaking once for up to (3) three minutes.)
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a member of the City Council requests separate discussion.) CC1. Proclaim September 8­14, 2025 as National Patriotism Week CC2. Adopt Resolution 2025­47, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for the Pre­Paid Warrant Register of August 31, 2025 in the amount of $1,876,985.24 and the Warrant Register of September 15, 2025 in the amount of $391,449.23.

CC3. Approve Minutes of the August 26, 2025 City Council Meeting CC4. Award of Construction Contract 2025­04 Fifth Street Et Al ­ Street Improvement Project to Vance Corporation and Approve Overall Project Budget of $1,120,000 Including Construction, Engineering and Contingency
CC5. Deny Claim Reed v. City of San Dimas CJP 3054602

CC2. Adopt Resolution 2025­47, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for the Pre­Paid Warrant Register of August 31, 2025 in the amount of $1,876,985.24 and the Warrant Register of September 15, 2025 in the amount of $391,449.23.

CC3. Approve Minutes of the August 26, 2025 City Council Meeting CC4. Award of Construction Contract 2025­04 Fifth Street Et Al ­ Street Improvement Project to Vance Corporation and Approve Overall Project Budget of $1,120,000 Including Construction, Engineering and Contingency
CC5. Deny Claim Reed v. City of San Dimas CJP 3054602
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
RECOMMENDATION: Approve consent calendar with recommendations as presented in staff reports.

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
PH1. Introduce Ordinance 1320, Amending  Title 18­Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S­F Single­Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF­A SingleFamily Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF­DR Single­Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code to Clarify the Intent of Certain Sections, Add Language to Sections where Policies have been in Place, but Never Codified, and Various Clean Up Items as Required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council:

Read by title and introduce Ordinance 1320, Approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 24­09, a request to amend Title 18­Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S­F Single­Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SFA Single­Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF­DR Single­Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code to clarify the intent of certain sections, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and various clean up items as required.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Members of the Audience (Speakers are limited to (3) minutes or as may be determined by the Chair.) CITY REPORTS
CR1. City Manager
CR2. City Attorney
CR3. Members of the City Council
Councilmembers’ Report on Meetings Attended at the Expense of the Local Agency (Pursuant to AB 1234 – G.C. §53232.3(d)
City Council Requests for Future Items, Comments and Updates

ADJOURNMENT
NtiRdiAiithDibilitiAtIliiththADAif

CR2. City Attorney
CR3. Members of the City Council
Councilmembers’ Report on Meetings Attended at the Expense of the Local Agency (Pursuant to AB 1234 – G.C. §53232.3(d)
City Council Requests for Future Items, Comments and Updates

ADJOURNMENT
Notice Regarding Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the ADA, if you need assistance to participate in a city meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 394­6216. Early notification before the meeting you wish to attend will make it possible for the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102­35.104 ADA Title II].

Copies of documents distributed for the meeting are available in alternative formats upon request. Any writings or documents provided to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public review Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and on Fridays from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Administration Department and San Dimas Library. In addition, most documents are posted on the City's website at www.sandimasca.gov.

Posting Statement:  I declare under penalty of perjury that on September 5, 2025, I posted a true and correct copy of this agenda on the bulletin board in the Civic Center Plaza of City Hall at 245 E. Bonita Ave.,San Dimas Library 145 N. Walnut Ave., San Dimas Post Office 300 E. Bonita Ave., Von’s Via Verde Shopping Center 1160 Via Verde Ave., and on the City's website www.sandimasca.gov/agendas­minutes/as required by law.

September 5, 2025 Debra Black
Debra Black, City Clerk

Patriotism Week
W HEREAS, The City of San Dimas promotes the ideals that the citizens of this nation live in freedom, won through the great sacrifices and many tribulations which have provided the foundation for a free, prosperous and independent life; and
W
HEREAS, We realize that each generation must work to maintain this freedom, otherwise, through carelessness or indifference, the rights and liberties enjoyed may vanish; and
WHEREAS, It is fitting and proper to recognize this freedom and to honor the nation, which provides it.

N
OW THEREFORE, I Mayor Emmett G. Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Weber, Councilmembers Rachel Bratakos, Eric Nakano and Ryan A. Vienna do hereby proclaim September 8-14th, 2025 as NATIONAL PATRIOTISM WEEK. During this week, we urge all citizens to join in expressing gratitude for the privilege of American Citizenship with appropriate celebrations and observances.

I
N WITNESS THEREOF, I, Mayor Emmett G. Badar, have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of San Dimas to be affixed this 9th day of September 2025.
___________________________________ Attest: ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

RESOLUTION 2025-47

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS,

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS
WHEREAS, the following listed demands have been audited by the Director of Administrative Services; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services has certified as to the availability of funds for payment thereto; and
WHEREAS, the register of audited demands has been submitted to the City Council for approval.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby approve the Pre-Paid Warrant Register of August 31, 2025 in the amount of $1,876,985.24 and the Warrant Register of September 15, 2025 in the amount of $391,449.23.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of September, 2025. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution 2025-47. It was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 9th, day of September, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

ACTION MINUTES
AUGUST 26, 2025, 7:00 PM

REGULAR MEETING
Council Members Present: Mayor Emmett Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Nakano, Councilmember Rachel Bratakos, Councilmember Ryan A. Vienna, Councilmember Eric Weber Staff: City Manager Brad McKinney, Assistant City Manager Travis Sais, Director of Public Works Shari Garwick, Director of Administrative Services Michael O’Brien, Director of Community Development Luis Torrico, Director of Parks and Recreation Scott Wasserman, City Attorney Jeff Malawy, City Clerk Debra Black, Landscape Manager Steven Farmer, Senior Administrative Analyst Lauren Marshall
Call to Order: 7:02 PM

CONSENT ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Adopt Resolution 2025-45, A Resolution
of the City Council of the City of San
Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for
the Warrant Register of August 29, 2025,
in the amount of $793,716.88

2. Approve Minutes of the August 12, 2025
Special Meeting and the August 12, 2025
City Council Meeting

3. Deny Claim Bennett v. City of San
Dimas CJP 3054332

4. Deny Claim Crenshaw v. City of San
Dimas CJP 3054704 GRV

5. Deny Claim Smith v. City of San Dimas
CJP 3047896 TV

6. Receive and File the July 2025
Investment Report

7. Award a Contract for the Design of
Marchant Park Regional Watershed
Management Program Project to CWE in
the Amount of $575,827, and Approve
and Allocate the Overall Project Budget
of $645,117, Including Contingency and
Engineering Services.

8. Approval of Additional National Opioid
Settlement with Purdue Pharma, LP and
the Sackler Family; Adoption of
Resolution 2025-46, Authorizing the City
MOTION: Motion/seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Weber/Councilmember Vienna to
approve items 1-8. Motion carried 5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Councilmember Nakano requested item 9 be
pulled for questions.

MOTION: Motion/seconded by
Councilmember Nakano/Councilmember
Vienna to approve item 9. Motion carried 5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

Approve Minutes of the August 26, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 2 For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
Manager to Execute the Settlement
Documents

9. Approve a Three-year Contract Renewal
with Intelligent Contracts, RLDatix for a
Cloud Based Contract Management
Solution in the Amount of $40,949.40
with Ongoing Annual Renewals Until a
Written Cancelation Notice is Issued.

OTHER BUSINESS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Update on the City's Boards,
Commissions, and Committees
MOTION: Motion/seconded by
Councilmember Nakano/Councilmember
Bratakos to appoint Maya Yassine as a youth
commissioner to the Parks and Recreation
Commission. Motion carried 5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
There was consensus to advertise the Parks
and Recreation Commission vacancy.

2. Proposal for Regulatory Signage and Dog
Waste Stations on City Trails
The item was tabled to a date uncertain.

CITY REPORTS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
a. City Manager City Manager McKinney provided updates on the following:
• City Hall’s roof construction is
scheduled to occur September 15 –
October 17.
• Sanitation District will be rehabilitating
existing sewer lines throughout the
City.
• August 29th will launch an AI Chatbox
on the City’s website to improve user
experience.
• CERT trainings are currently open for
registration. October 5th from 10 am –
4pm at the Senior Center.
• City Hall will be closed on September
1 st in observance of Labor Day.
b. City Attorney None.
c. Members of the City Council
Reports on Meetings Attended AB 1234
(G.C. §53232.3(d))
None.

CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR

FUTURE ITEMS

COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
None.

Approve Minutes of the August 26, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 3 For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
Adjourned: 7:45 P.M.

I, Debra Black, City Clerk attest that these draft minutes are accurate and reflective of the actions taken by the City Council.
________________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Peter Jacoy, Assistant Engineer
Subject: Award of Construction Contract 2025-04 Fifth Street Et Al - Street Improvement Project to Vance Corporation and Approve Overall Project Budget of $1,120,000 Including Construction, Engineering and Contingency ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Construction Contract 2025-04, Fifth Street Et Al - Street Improvement Project combines removal and replacement of existing asphalt concrete and minor Portland cement concrete on East Fifth Street, North Belleview Avenue, North Hallock Avenue, East Payson Street, North Smead Way, and Gladstone Street. These roadways show excessive wear and degradation and without rehabilitation will continue to require major maintenance repairs. Repairing these street sections will reduce future maintenance costs, increase safety and provide an aesthetically pleasing, smooth street surface for our residents. In total, the project consists of approximately 273,500 square feet of pavement reconstruction using approximately 4,125 tons of asphalt and includes re-striping traffic legends and replacement of minor concrete.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt the plans and specifications included as part of the bid package for Contract 2025-04 Fifth Street Et Al – Street Improvement Project and on file with Public Works

2. Declare the Bid from Estate Design and Construction, Inc., non-responsive and reject the Bid for the following reasons, all as further described in the Staff Report:
a. Failure to meet required self-performance requirements. b. Failure to identify all subcontractors and failure to correct this omission within the required timeframe.
c. Incorrect subcontractor information and failure to correct this mistake in accordance with the Public Contract Code.
d. Inconsistent subcontractor information (identifying one subcontractor in the bid and a different subcontractor in supplemental information).

Award of Construction Contract 2025-04 Fifth Et Al - Street Improvement Project Page 2 For the Meeting of September 9, 2025

3. Appropriate and allocate $220,000.00 from Measure M (Fund 76) and allocate monies budgeted in Fiscal Year 2024-25 in Measure R (Fund 74) and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Act “SB1” (Fund 77), to the project.

4. Award Construction Contract 2025-04 Fifth Street Et Al - Street Improvement Project to Vance Corporation as the lowest responsive bidder for the bid amount of $894,454.38.

5. Authorize and appropriate total project budget of $1,120,000.00 ($894,454.38 for the construction contract, 20% contingency and $46,654.74 for geotechnical testing, survey and engineering services).

6. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the Construction Contract with Vance Corporation in a form approved by the City Attorney.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Yes

FISCAL IMPACT
Construction Contract 2025-04 Fifth Street Et Al - Street Improvement Project, has a budget of $900,000.00 allocated in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Funding consists of $600,000.00 from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Act “SB1” (Fund 77), restricted for pavement repairs, and $300,000.00 from Measure R (Fund 74). In order to fund contingency and engineering services, staff recommends that Council appropriate and allocate $220,000 from Measure M (Fund 76).

The award will be made to the lowest responsive bidder, Vance Corporation, based on the Base Bid Items. The Additive Alternative Bid is considered in addition to the Base Bid. The Vance Corporation Base Bid totals $696,934.38 and includes improvements on East Fifth Street (San Dimas Avenue to Walnut Avenue), Bellevue Avenue, Hallock Avenue, and Gladstone Street (from Monte Vista Street to Amelia Avenue). Vance Corporation’s Additive Alternative Bid covers Payson Street and Smead Avenue, with an alternative bid amount of $197,520.00.

Should the City Council move forward with Construction Contract 2025-04 Fifth Street Et Al - Street Improvement Project, the total project budget will include the contract construction costs, as well as 20% Contingency, and $46,654.74 for geotechnical testing, inspection services, survey and engineering service. Incorporating the lowest bid, the project budget is as follow:

Construction Bid $894,454.38
Engineering Services & Inspection $46,654.74
Project Contingency, (20%) $178,890.88
$1,120,000.00
The anticipated total construction project budget expenditure for Construction Contract 2025-04 Fifth Street Et Al - Street Improvement Project is $1,120,000.00.

BACKGROUND
Construction Contract 2025-04 Fifth Street Et Al - Street Improvement Project includes the removal and replacement of asphalt concrete on East Fifth Street, North Belleview Avenue, North Hallock Avenue, East Payson Street, North Smead Way, and Gladstone Street (Attachment 1).

These roadways show excessive wear, degradation and without reconstruction will continue to require major maintenance. Repairing these streets will reduce future maintenance cost, increase safety and will provide an aesthetically pleasing smooth street surface for our residents.

Award of Construction Contract 2025-04 Fifth Et Al - Street Improvement Project Page 3 For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
In total, the project consists of approximately 273,500 square feet of pavement reconstruction and rehabilitation using a total of 4,125 tons of asphalt concrete pavement. This project will also include minor concrete repairs such as removal and replacement of longitudinal gutter and cross gutters, and new accessible corner ramps.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
On May 29, 2025, the City Clerk publicly opened twelve formal bids for Construction Contract 2025-04, Fifth Street Et Al - Street Improvement Project. The preliminary bid results are as follows:

Contractor Base Bid
1 Vance Corporation $696,934.38
2 Onyx Paving Co, Inc. $748,000.00
3 Gentry Brothers, Inc. $784,000.00
4 All American Asphalt $827,227.00
5 Hardy & Harper, Inc. $830,000.00
6 Sequel Contractors, Inc. $832,180.00
7 Dash Construction $858,190.00
8 Vido Samarzich, Inc. $858,210.00
9 Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. $954,725.00
10 We R Builders, Inc. $1,029,395.00
11 Van Engineering $1,255,900.00
- Estate Design and Construction – Non-Responsive $679,900.00 The award will be made to the lowest, responsive bidder based on the Base Bid Items. The Additive Alternative Bid is considered in addition to the Base Bid. The Base Bid includes improvements on East Fifth Street (San Dimas Avenue to Walnut Avenue), Bellevue Avenue, Hallock Avenue, and Gladstone Street (from Monte Vista Street to Amelia Avenue). The Additive Alternative Bid covers Payson Street and Smead Avenue.

The sealed bid submitted by Estate Design and Construction, Inc. was initially considered to be the lowest bid based on the Base Bid Items. However, after the time of bid opening, the City received a bid protest submitted in accordance with the San Dimas Municipal Code from Vance Corporation raising concerns regarding the experience of Estate Design and Construction, Inc., and questioning whether Estate Design and Construction, Inc., met the requirement in the bid documents (by incorporation of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (the “Greenbook”) that the prime contractor self-perform at least 50% of the contract value.

After reviewing the bid protest, and in consultation with the City Attorney’s Office, City staff requested supplemental information from Estate Design and Construction, Inc., in support of its bid to confirm whether Estate Design and Construction’s bid met the requirements of the bid specifications. After reviewing the supplemental information submitted by Estate Design and Construction, City staff determined that Vance Corporation’s protest should be granted and that Estate Design and Construction’s bid should be deemed non-responsive and rejected due to the following deficiencies:

Award of Construction Contract 2025-04 Fifth Et Al - Street Improvement Project Page 4 For the Meeting of September 9, 2025

1. Failure to meet self-performance requirements: The bid did not satisfy the minimum selfperformance threshold required under the Greenbook, Section 3-2 (Self-Performance), as incorporated into Section SP-1 of the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids. Section 3-2 of the Greenbook requires the prime contractor “to perform, with its own organization, Contract work amounting to at least 50 percent of the Contract Price … .” As part of the requests for supplemental information, City staff asked Estate Design and Construction to provide a breakdown of all costs included in its bid between materials and labor and showing which portions of the work would be self-performed and which portions would be subcontracted. In support of the breakdown, Estate Design and Construction was asked to provide estimates from the subcontractors and suppliers identified in its bid. Upon review of this information, City staff determined that Estate Design and Construction would only be self-performing 44.17% of its total bid price.

2. Omission of subcontractor listing: During the course of the City’s discussions with Estate and Design related to the City’s evaluation of the bid protest, City staff learned that Estate Design and Construction would be subcontracting out land surveying services.

Estate Design and Constructions bid did not include the required subcontractor listing for land survey services, and this omission was not corrected within the timeframe permitted under California Public Contract Code (PCC) §§ 4104 and 4107.5, which govern inadvertent clerical errors in subcontractor listings. The deadline to remedy this omission has expired.

3. Incorrect Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) number for subcontractor: The subcontractor’s DIR registration number was incorrectly provided, and the correction procedures outlined in PCC §§ 4104 and 4107.5 were not followed.

4. Inconsistent subcontractor identification: The bid identified one subcontractor that would be performing paving activities. During the course of the City’s review of the supplemental information as part of the bid protest evaluation, the City determined that the subcontractor estimate for paving services was from a different subcontractor than the subcontractor identified in the original bid, which is not considered a correctable clerical error under PCC § 4104.

Following conclusion of the bid protest evaluation, Staff reviewed the bid proposal provided by the next lowest bidder, Vance Corporation, to confirm that it meets the requirements of the bid package and also verified that the contractor’s bid bond is issued by an admitted surety, as required by PCC §§ 20170. It was confirmed through the State Contractor’s License State Board that the contractor’s license 414567, Class A, C-31, is current and active with an expiration date of November 30, 2025. The contractor is registered through the Department of Industrial Relations as required by law (Registration No. 1000008103). Vance Corporation has successfully completed the Construction Contract 2024-02 Lone Hill Avenue Street Improvement Project for the City.

ALTERNATIVES
• The City Council may choose to not adopt the plans and specifications, not reject the bid from Estate Design and Construction, Inc., and not award or authorize the construction budget for Construction Contract 2025-04, Fifth Street Et Al - Street Improvement Project. The funding allocated for the construction could be used to complete other future road repairs or pavement preservation projects. Delaying the 2025-04, Fifth Street

Award of Construction Contract 2025-04 Fifth Et Al - Street Improvement Project Page 5 For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
Et Al - Street Improvement Project would result in increased maintenance costs and may require more extensive and costly treatments to complete the future pavement repairs at this location.
• The City Council may choose to award the construction budget for only the Base Bid of Construction Contract 2025-04, Fifth Street Et Al – Street Improvement Project. This option would exclude the Additive Alternative Bid, thereby omitting rehabilitation work on Payson Street and Smead Avenue. As a result, these streets would continue to deteriorate, leading to higher maintenance costs and costly pavement repairs in the future.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Staff evaluated and determined that CC2025-04 Fifth Street Et Al - Street Improvement Project is categorically exempt per CEQA under the “Class 1” (14 CCR §15301) exemption. This is considered maintenance of an existing infrastructure; no modifications to traffic flow and no additional vehicle travel lanes will be created.

Respectfully submitted,
Peter Jacoy
Assistant Engineer
Attachments:

1. CC2025-04 Fifth Street - Et Al - Street Improvement Project, Location Map

2. Levine Act/GC 84308 Disclosure

CC2025-04 FIFTH STREET ET AL

STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LOCATION MAP

ATTACHMENT 2

PO Box 2411, Tustin, CA 92781
T: 657-622-4200 | F: 866-254-4423 | www.carlwarren.com
CA License #2607296
9/4/2025
TO: City of San Dimas
ATTENTION: Debra Black, Brad McKinney

RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT
RE: Claimant: Matthew Reed
Our Client: City of San Dimas
Date of Loss: 07-11-2025
Our File Number: CJP-3054602
Please allow this correspondence to acknowledge receipt of the captioned claim. Please take the following action:
➢ CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant.

Please include proof of mailing with your rejection notice to the claimant. Please provide us with a copy of the Notice of Rejection and a copy of the Proof of Mailing. If you have any questions, feel free to contact the assigned adjuster or the undersigned claims specialist.

Very Truly Yours,
Janice Baluyut
Janice Baluyut
Claims Examiner
Carl Warren & Company, LLC | A Venbrook Company
Direct: 657.622.4326
Email: [email protected]

PO Box 2411, Tustin, CA 92781
T: 657-622-4200 | F: 866-254-4423 | www.carlwarren.com
CA License # 2607296
9/ 4/ 2025
Matthew Reed
Explanation of Rejection
RE: Claim : Matthew Reed V. City of San Dimas
Claimant : Matthew Reed
Member : City of San Dimas
Date Rec’ d by Mbr : 07-30-2025
Date of Event : 07-11-2025
CW File Number : CJP- 3054602
Dear Mr. Reed:

As you may recall we are the claim administrators for the City of San Dimas.

We have tendered your claim to the contractor, Grigolla & Sons Construction Co. Inc. The contractor has advised us via email on 09-04-2025, that they have paid and settled your claim.

This information was sent to the city as well as our recommendation to close their file Thank you
Janice Baluyut
Janice Baluyut
Claims Examiner
Carl Warren & Company, LLC | A Venbrook Company
Direct: 657.622.4326
Email: JBaluyut@CarlWarren. com
Cc: City of San Dimas

uly 30, 2025

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Anne Moore, Senior Planner
Subject: Discussion and Consideration of Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09, to Amend Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter

18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code to Clarify the Intent of Certain Sections, Add Language to Sections where Policies have been in Place, but Never Codified, and Various Clean Up Items as Required. ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
For the past several years, staff has been auditing the San Dimas Municipal Code (SDMC) to identify ways to make the Code more functional, as well as more user-friendly for residents, contractors, and staff to understand and navigate. To this end, Staff identified several Chapters of the SDMC Title 18-Zoning that should be amended, updated, deleted and/or modified.

On April 27, 2021, the City Council approved the initiation of a Municipal Code Text Amendment (MCTA) to amend the Chapters identified by staff. The MCTA was broken up into three (3) separate MCTA actions. MCTA Action No. 1 consists of amending Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SFDR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code. MCTA Action No. 2 consists of amending SDMC Section 17.12 Preliminary and Tentative Maps – Filing Procedures, Chapter 18.12 Development Plan Review Board, Chapter 18.196 Temporary Uses, Chapter 18.200 Conditional Use Permits, Chapter 18.204 Variances, Chapter 18.208 Zone Changes and Amendments, and Chapter 18.212 Appeal Procedures. MCTA Action No. 3 consists of amending Chapter 18.08 Definitions and Chapter 18.188 Explosives. In addition, the initiation included the amendment of other applicable chapters as required.

MCTA Action No. 2 and No. 3 will be presented to both the Planning Commission and the City Council at a later date. As part of MCTA 24-09, Staff has included Chapter 18.28 Single-Family Agriculture (SF-A) Zone in order to provide clarification on permitted animals and the requirement for horse stables.

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 2
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
MCTA 24-09 is intended to clarify the intent of the above-mentioned sections, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and various clean up items as required.

On November 21, 2024, the Planning Commission heard MCTA 24-09 and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of MCTA 24-09 to the City Council.

At the January 14, 2025, regular City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to bring back MCTA 24-09 to a study session in order to further discuss the proposed changes.

At the July 22, 2025, City Council study session, the City Council discussed MCTA 24-09 and recommended Staff bring the proposed changes to City Council at a public hearing with some minor modifications.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council:
• Read by title and introduce Ordinance 1320, Approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09, a request to amend Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code to clarify the intent of certain sections, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and various clean up items as required.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
Since the establishment of the City’s zoning code, there have been a number of updates that have been made to Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone that were done either due to land use determinations or to provide clarity on specific residential development standards. All of the abovementioned sections of Title-18 Zoning were last amended in 2014 through Ordinance No. 1226 to allow the keeping of certain types of fowl in a limited number as household pets.

There have been a number of code compliance cases that have arisen in the past decade due to sections of the San Dimas Municipal Code (Code) that may be unclear, unaddressed, or misinterpreted. As a result, various sections of the Code are in need of being cleaned up and updated. In addition, there are numerous City Council adopted policies that have been in place that have not been codified, which staff is including as part of this amendment. By codifying many

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 3
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
of these policies that affect residentially zoned properties, the Code would be more functional, as well as more user-friendly for residents, contractors, and staff to understand and navigate.

On April 27, 2021, the City Council initiated a Municipal Code Text amendment, which identified several Chapters of the SDMC Title 18-Zoning that should be amended, updated, deleted and/or modified. The MCTA initiation is broken up into three separate MCTA actions. MCTA Action No. 1 consists of amending Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F SingleFamily Residential Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code. MCTA Action No. 2 consists of amending SDMC Section 17.12 Preliminary and Tentative Maps – Filing Procedures, Chapter 18.12 Development Plan Review Board, Chapter 18.196 Temporary Uses, Chapter 18.200 Conditional Use Permits, Chapter

18.204 Variances, Chapter 18.208 Zone Changes and amendments, and Chapter 18.212 Appeal Procedures. MCTA Action No. 3 consists of amending chapter 18.08 Definitions and Chapter

18.188 Explosives. In addition, the initiation included the amendment of other applicable chapters as required.

MCTA 24-09 was considered by the Planning Commission at their November 21, 2024, meeting (See Attachment 6). Staff stated to the Commission that the bulk of the changes to the SF, SFDR, SF-A, and Residential Zones Generally sections of the Municipal Code are to codify already existing policies and address clean up items in the Code. Staff also clarified that the short-term rental prohibition, the five-foot rear yard setback and the required distance from horse corrals to school and hospital buildings are new items. During the discussion, the Commission inquired about whether having policies would be easier to change than a Municipal Code. Staff informed the Commission that although it is easier to change a policy, staff has been directed within the past few years to not create policies, but to codify items into the Code as it makes it clear to the public what the City regulations are and allows for enforcement of the regulations. After further discussion, the Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval to the City Council of MCTA 24-

09. At the January 14, 2025, regular City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to bring back the MCTA 24-09, to a study session in order to further discuss the proposed changes (Attachment 5).

At the July 22, 2025, City Council study session (Attachment 4), the City Council discussed the proposed changes and directed Staff to bring back the item to the City Council for consideration with minor modifications to MCTA 24-09. The changes that were requested consisted of the following:

1. Remove the proposed minimum 10-foot setback to side/rear property lines requirement for swimming pool rockscapes that are greater than six feet in height and allow for a 5- foot setback to side/rear property lines for swimming pools, pool equipment, and rockscapes regardless of height;

2. Eliminate the City’s existing policy regarding removal of existing curb cuts within the Town Core;

3. Examine average quantity of homing pigeons and propose a reasonable quantity above the proposed 25 limit; and

4. Allow carports within all residentially zoned properties with the creation of specific design and development standards that would prohibit the use of carports for storage.

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 4
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The Residential Zones Generally (Chapter 18.20) section of the Code was created with the intent of providing regulations for certain uses across all residentially zoned properties within the City.

However, the existing Residential Zones Generally section of the Code has historically been used very sparingly due to the limited uses and standards that it refers to. Following a comprehensive review of the development standards within the Code that pertain to residential properties, staff observed that there are numerous sections that are applicable for all residential properties.

Therefore, staff determined that it would be best to separate and consolidate these development standards collectively into Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally. In addition, incorporating a number of City Council adopted policies into this Residential Zones Generally section will assist staff in addressing common code compliance concerns more efficiently and consistently across all residentially zoned properties.

Staff has comprised all the proposed amendments into four categories listed below, that identify the code section that is being discussed and the reason for the amendment:

Table 1: Adopted Policies to be Codified
Table 2: Code Language relocated to 18.20 Residential Zones Generally Table 3: Code Language to be Revised/Cleaned Up
Table 4: New Code Language
It is worth noting that since these City Council adopted policies are not available in the Code, applicants and homeowners are not aware of these standards, which can create confusion when corrections, based on the policies, are provided by Staff. Therefore, this amendment includes the policies identified in Table 1 below. Table 1 also provides the date the policy was adopted by City Council. Each of these policies with the exception of Item #1, will all be added to Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally and a column is included in Table 1 identifying the new corresponding zoning section. Many of the policies have been slightly modified/updated in order to better address issues that have risen since the policy was originally adopted, but the intent of the adopted policy has not been changed. A brief explanation of the modifications to a number of the policies is included in a “Notes” column. All of the policies identified in Table 1 are included in Attachment 2.

Table 1: Adopted Polices to be Codified
Policy
CC
Adoption
Date
Notes SDMC

1. Flag poles and flags 8/24/2006 Modified to comply with the Second Amendment and remove restriction
on flag content, increase quantity of
flags to two, and remove hours of
display.

18.20.120

2. Fencing and decking
encroachment into
the slope area
5/12/2007 Will provide clarity to residents in
residential hillside areas.

18.20.100.A.6

3. Exterior fireplaces 2/29/2008 Modified to reduce height from 10 feet to 8 feet and remove distance
requirement between structures.

18.20.110

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 5
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
As mentioned earlier in the report, staff observed that there are numerous sections that are applicable for all residential properties that should be consolidated into Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally. These sections that can be applied across all residentially zoned properties have been relocated into Chapter 18.20 and are listed in Table 2. Many of the sections listed in Table 2 pertain to already existing sections of the Code but were modified to read more clearly in the code. The original zoning section is identified in the “SDMC (original)” column and the new zoning section where it is being placed into Chapter 18.20 is identified in the “SDMC (new)” column. An added “Notes” column is included with a brief explanation as to why the specific code section is being revised.

In addition to the City Council adopted policies identified in Table 1 that will be codified, and the relocation of various zoning sections to be consolidated into Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally identified in Table 2, the amendment will also include numerous clean-up items listed in Table 3. Many of the clean-up items listed in Table 3 pertain to already existing sections of the

4. Fences and walls 12/1/2008 Modified to include standards for vacant & corner lots and include
specific allowed materials.

18.20.100

5. Undergrounding of
utilities
5/4/2009 Restrictions on height of electric
service masts added.

18.20.220

6. Canopy and other
membrane
structures
5/12/2009 Modified to include vehicle covers,
specific allowed materials, and
definitive duration of 6 months.

18.20.080

7. Mechanical
equipment and
screening
7/22/2010 Modified criteria for outdoor water
heaters and portable window air
conditioners/heating units.

18.20.160

8. Pool, spa and
rockscape setbacks
4/25/2011 Include setbacks for pool equipment
and allow rockscapes regardless of
their height to be located 5 feet from
the side/rear property lines.

18.20.210
Table 2: Code Language relocated to 18.20 Residential Zones Generally Code
Revision/Update Notes SDMC (original)
SDMC
(new)

1. Refuse storage
location
Provides clear standards for refuse
storage location and screening from
public right-of-way due to high number
of complaints received by Code
Compliance.

18.35.050.E 18.20.180

2. Residential lighting Directs residential lighting to be downward to protect adjoining
properties.

18.24.050.H 18.20.150

3. Clarify landscaping
requirements
Ensures residents understand that
parkway landscaping falls under their
responsibility and that all front yard
and street side yards are properly
maintained.

18.35.050.G 18.20.140

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 6
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
Code and the applicable zoning section is identified in the “SDMC” column. An added “Notes” column is included with a brief explanation as to why the specific code section is being revised.

Table 3: Code Language to be Revised/Up Cleaned Up
Code Revision/Update Notes SDMC

1. Clarify the term “fowl” Provides clarity to residents that fowls are permitted except for roosters.

18.28.020.C.b

2. Add prohibition of
roosters and peacocks in
Single-Family Agriculture
(SF-A) Zone
This is done to be consistent with the
Residential Zones Generally section.

18.28.035.A

3. Requirements for open
corrals/enclosed box
stalls
Provides more detailed size/design
parameters and distance from
“habitable structure”.

18.28.040.C.

4. Physical encroachments
into required side yard
setbacks
Provides flexibility for residents for
locating mechanical equipment and
portable sheds within the required 12-
foot side yard setback.

18.24.040.E.2

5. Describe lots that have
alley access
Assists residents/code compliance on
applicability of zoning standards for
properties with alley access.

18.24.040.E.3.ii

6. Further define lot
coverage calculation
Assists residents/applicants on what
structures to include in order to
properly calculate lot coverage.

18.24.040.F.2

7. Add carport as a
permitted use
Carports are already listed as a
permitted use within the SF Zone, so it
is being added to the SF-DR Zone for
consistency.

18.35.020.B.6.b

8. Clarify flag lots in S-F
Zone
Restrict the pole portion of flag lots to
be used for access only and excluded
from calculating minimum required
parcel size and provide an example
diagram of a flag lot for residents to
better understand.

18.24.040.C

9. Clarify flag lots in SF-DR
Zone
Restrict the pole portion of flag lots to
be used for access only and provide
an example diagram of a flag lot for
residents to better understand.

18.35.040.B.b

10. Reduce quantity of
homing pigeons from 100
to 50 and remove permit
requirements
Removes unnecessary permit
application and renewal process.

18.20.060.D.2.f

11. Remove modification of
development standards
code section in SF Zone
Modifications of development
standards are typically processed
through the City’s Variance process;
therefore, removing it avoids

18.24.060

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 7
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
Lastly, there are several new items that Staff is introducing as part of MCTA 24-09, which are identified in Table 4. Table 4 also includes the section where the new code language will be located under the “SDMC” column. Items listed #4-7 in Table 4 are considered new items primarily because they were not clearly described in the code, but were determinations made by the confusion and makes it consistent with
the Code.

12. Remove development
restriction on lots less
than 6,000 sq. ft. in size
There are a number of lots in the SFDR that are undersized, and prohibiting development would be
considered a taking.

18.35.050.A.3

13. Remove requirement of
lot merger for remnant
railroad parcels
Removal of this is warranted to allow
property owners abutting remnant
railroad parcels to do improvements to
their home.

18.35.050.A.4

14. Increase minimum depth
required in Single-Family
Downtown Residential
(SF-DR) Zone
Increased to 140 feet due to many
standard lots in the SF-DR Zone
already having this depth.

18.35.040.B.2

15. Reduce storage of
materials on a property
after construction from 60
days to 15 days
Requires residents to remove excess
construction debris/materials in a
timely manner.

18.20.040

16. Remove section in SFDR for nonconforming
residence that is
destroyed or substantially
damaged, and rebuilt.

Separate section addressing
nonconforming structures already
exists in SDMC Section 18.204.170
Nonconforming Uses.

18.35.080.C.3.c &

18.35.080.C.4

17. Allow existing legal
structures located on
legal lots between 5,000
to 7,000 square feet to be
modified, altered, or
added onto.

Allows residents of undersized lots to
still make improvements to their
residence so long as building code
requirements are met.

18.35.040.A.2

18. Remove public or private
utility service facility as a
conditionally permitted
use
This type of use includes vehicle,
equipment and material
parking/storage and related activities,
which is typically discouraged in
residential zones

18.35.030.G

19. Remove detached
garages and accessory
buildings built at zero lot
line.

Buildings and structures built at zero
lot in single-family residentially zoned
properties create maintenance and
fire safety concerns.

18.35.040.D.2.a

20. Remove “Incentives”
section under “Design
Guidelines” for SF-DR
Removing this section does not take
away from applying Town ore Design
Guidelines.

18.35.070.C

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 8
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
Director over time through various code compliance cases. Therefore, staff is incorporating these items into the code language to better assist residents in the future.

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 8
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
The changes described above in Tables 1-4 are not intended to change the overall purpose of the single-family standards but are meant to update the Code so it is more functional, provides clarification, and will make it more user- friendly for residents, contractors, and Staff to understand and navigate.

At the July 22, 2025, City Council study session, after considerable discussion on MCTA 24-09, several changes were requested by the City Council to be made. The changes that were requested consisted of the following, which have also been included in the Tables above:

1. Remove the proposed minimum 10-foot setback to side/rear property lines requirement for swimming pool rockscapes that are greater than six feet in height and allow for a 5- foot setback to side/rear property lines for swimming pools, pool equipment, and rockscapes regardless of height;
Table 4: New Code Language
New Code Language Notes SDMC

1. Include horse corral
distance requirements from
hospitals/schools
The 100-foot distance requirement from
hospitals/schools is standard in LA
County and throughout the state.

18.28.040.C

2. Introduce rear yard setback
for SF Zone and modify rear
yard setback for SF-DR
Ensures structures that require a building
permit to be located a minimum of 10 feet
from the rear property line or 5 feet for
non-habitable accessory structures. This
allows for privacy and open yard space.

18.24.050.E.3
&

18.35.040.D.

4. 3. Prohibit short-term rentals City has received many complaints, and this prohibition will assist Code
Compliance on enforcement.

18.20.020.B.

4. Accessory structures further
defined
Provides clarification for residents/code
compliance on permitted accessory
structures and setback requirements.

18.20.070

5. Storage sheds defined Allows residents to have portable storage sheds up to a certain quantity, provides
minimum setback/distance requirements
from sheds to other structures on
residential property, and exempts the first
three sheds from lot coverage
requirements.

18.20.200

6. Clarify allowance
parameters of outdoor
storage and storage
containers
Restricts timeframe for outdoor storage
containers and includes information on
an encroachment permit if located on the
public right-of-way.

18.20.170

7. Maintenance of sloped
areas
Makes it clear to residents that sloped
areas within their property need to be
properly maintained and remain
unaltered unless approved by the City.

18.20.190

8. Design and development
standards for carports
Provides design and development
standards for carports that previously did
not exist.

18.20.90

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 9
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025

2. Examine average quantity of homing pigeons and propose a reasonable quantity above the proposed 25 limit;

3. Allow carports within all residentially zoned properties with the creation of specific development standards that would prohibit the use of carports for storage; and

4. Eliminate the City’s existing policy regarding removal of existing curb cuts within the Town Core.

The policy regarding pool, spa and rockscape setbacks considered rockscapes greater than six feet in height to be considered as an accessory structure and must comply with the normal building setbacks for the zone. Since the City Council was opposed to the 10-foot setback to side and rear property lines for swimming pool rockscapes that are greater than six feet in height, rockscapes regardless of their height must adhere to the new proposed five-foot setback to the rear and side property line. This five-foot setback to rear and side property line, which also includes the street side property line, will also apply to swimming pools, spas, and pool equipment.

The existing Code allows for a quantity of 100 homing pigeons with a special permit issued by the ity. As part of MCTA 24-09, staff and the Planning Commission recommended eliminating the special permit requirement and reducing the quantity to 25 homing pigeons. City Council directed staff to look at the typical quantity for homing pigeons and to propose a number greater than 25 homing pigeons. Staff did some research and found that the quantity of homing pigeons kept and raced varied greatly, with the average number of homing pigeons kept being around 60. Cities such as the City of Glendora allow for 75 homing pigeons with a permit while the City of Long Beach allows for 40 with a permit. Staff is proposing to allow a quantity of 50 homing pigeons and to eliminate the special permit requirement.

Chapter 18.35 Single-Family Downtown Residential currently prohibits carports whereas Chapter

18.24 Single-Family Residential (S-F) currently allows carports. Additionally, the vehicle parking section of the Code requires a two-car garage for a single-family home. This has created confusion with residents on what is allowed versus what is required, and to avoid further confusion, staff and the Planning Commission recommended the removal of carports from the SF Zone. However, there are a number of carports that exist within the SF-DR Zone. As part of the discussion with City Council at the July 22, 2025, study session, City Council wanted to allow carports as a permitted use throughout all residentially zoned properties and directed staff to create specific development design standards to require the structure to be compatible with the main structure and to prohibit the use of carports for storage. These design and development standards are included in Attachment 1 under “SDMC Section 18.20.90 Carports” (Pages 9-10 of Attachment 1).

The elimination of the City’s existing policy for curb cuts and driveway access from the street within the Town Core area will allow existing properties in the Town Core that have both alley access and driveway access from the street to keep both means of access onto their property.

This determination by the City Council to eliminate the existing policy was in part due to the rise in construction of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) within the City and the State’s exemption of parking requirements associated with ADUs. By allowing property owners in the Town Core to keep and maintain their existing driveway access from the street, this will allow additional parking for individuals residing within new ADUs. This should in turn, help reduce the amount of vehicle parking on the street. With the elimination of the policy, however, brings into question whether or not a property owner within the Town Core would be allowed to propose a new curb cut and driveway from the street when done in conjunction with a proposed ADU. This was not addressed during the study session discussion, but staff would like to make note that in accordance with the

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 10
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025
City’s Town Core Design Guidelines, which were adopted by City Council on December 7, 1993, additional curb cuts in the Town Core were deemed unacceptable (see Figure 1).

The Town Core Guidelines specify that the “streets in the Town Core were designed and built with a severe camber to facilitate drainage. Curb cuts interrupt smooth drainage flow and are difficult to construct to avoid bottoming out.” Also, on page 52 and 53 of the Guidelines (Attachment 3) it mentions that: (1) Additional curb cuts should be discouraged, (2) Parking should be entered only off back alleys, and parking should be provided in garages (3) Garage and parking entered from streets should be discouraged. Staff proposes to continue adhering to the Town Core Design Guidelines in regard to discouraging additional curb cuts and new driveways be constructed within the Town Core area. An alternative approach, however, is to allow a new driveway and curb cut to be constructed only if it leads to a legal covered parking space in a garage or accessory carport. This approach would not only provide additional parking but also encourage property owners in the Town Core to construct a garage or carport if one did not exist.

This approach would also discourage the addition of new driveways that do not lead to an approved covered parking space.

Moreover, all of the changes proposed as part of MCTA 24-09 is not intended to change the overall purpose of the single-family standards but are meant to update the Code so it is more functional, provides clarification, and will make it more user-friendly for residents, contractors, and Staff to understand and navigate. Furthermore, the proposed changes are in line with the direction provided to Staff by the City Council at the July 22, 2025 Study Session.

ALTERNATIVES
There are currently no alternatives proposed for this request; however, the City Council may recommend changes to the proposed MCTA language.

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 11
For the Meeting of September 9, 2025

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Anne Moore
Senior Planner
Attachments:

1. Ordinance 1320

2. City Council Adopted Policies to be Codified

3. Pages 52-53 of Town Core Design Guidelines

4. January 22, 2025, City Council Study Session Staff Report

5. January 14, 2025, City Council Staff Report & Action Summary

6. November 21, 2024, Planning Commission Staff Report, Minutes & Resolution PC-1688

ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE 1320

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS,

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT
AMENDMENT 24-09, AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18-ZONING, CHAPTER

18.20 RESIDENTIAL ZONES GENERALLY, CHAPTER 18.24 S-F SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, CHAPTER 18.28 SF-A SINGLE-FAMILY AGRICULTURE ZONE, AND CHAPTER 18.35 SF-DR SINGLE-FAMILY

DOWNTOWN RESIDNETIAL ZONE OF THE SAN DIMAS MUNICIPAL CODE

TO CLARIFY THE INTENT OF CERTAIN SECTIONS, ADD LANGUAGE TO

SECTIONS WHERE POLICIES HAVE BEEN IN PLACE, BUT NEVER
CODIFIED, AND VARIOUS CLEAN UP ITEMS AS REQUIRED.

WHEREAS, an Amendment to the San Dimas Municipal Code has been duly initiated by the City of San Dimas; and
WHEREAS, the Amendment is described as an amendment to Title 18-Zoning, Chapter

18.20 – Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 – S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 – SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 – SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code to clarify the intent of certain sections, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and various clean up items as required; and
WHEREAS, on April 27, 2021, the City Council approved to initiate the Municipal Code Text Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Amendment would affect all residentially zones parcels of the City as applicable within Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Single-Family (SF) Zone, SingleFamily Downtown Residential (SF-DR) Zone, and Single-Family Agriculture (SF-A) Zone; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a noticed public hearing on November 21, 2024, heard evidence and voted 5-0 recommending approval to the City Council of Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09; and
WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the City Council public hearing on the matter and that public hearing was held on January 14, 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., with all testimony received being made part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, the City Council continued the public hearing to a date uncertain in order to have the item further discussed at a proposed study session; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a study session on the matter and that study session was held on July 22, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., with all testimony received being made part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the City Council public hearing on the matter and that public hearing was held on September 9, 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., with all testimony received being made part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met for the consideration of whether the project will have a significant effect on the environment. it has

Ordinance 1320 Page 2
Approving MCTA 24-09
been determined that this action is not a project under CEQA, as there will be no direct physical or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the evidence received at the City Council hearing; and or the reasons discussed by the City Council at the (date to be determined), hearing, the City Council now finds as follows:

A. The proposed Municipal Code Text amendment will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value, precedent or be detrimental to the area.

The proposed amendment would codify numerous existing City Council adopted policies in addition to standardizing certain uses across all residentially zoned properties within the City. Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 would clarify existing regulations with the intent of ensuring compatibility with surrounding uses and mitigate negative impacts to the public health, safety and general welfare associated with residential improvements and/or new residential development. The proposed amendment will also address concerns raised by residents that have been detrimental to the area. The creation of minimum distance requirement of one-hundred feet from any school building or hospital building for horse corrals, box stalls and stables in addition to clarifying the prohibition of roosters and peacocks in the Single-Family Agriculture (SF-A) Zone will assist in mitigating negative impacts. By incorporating additional language for rear and side yard setback requirements in the Single-Family Residential (SF) and Single-Family Downtown Residential (SF-DR) Zone, the proposed amendment will actually assist in protecting property value and resident safety.

B. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment will further the public health, safety and general welfare.

The intent of the proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 is to provide clarification to already existing development standards within the City’s residentially zoned properties to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses and mitigate negative impacts to the public health, safety and general welfare associated with existing residential improvements and/or new residential development. City Staff has received numerous complaints from residents related to the absence of certain development standards or the ambiguity of certain sections of the Zoning Code. The proposed changes and clean up items to the Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone will directly address concerns related to the public health, safety and general welfare.

C. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and applicable Zoning.

The proposed amendment will amend four existing chapters of the San Dimas Municipal Code to provide clarification to sections that were unclear or unaddressed, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and various clean up items. These added standards are to ensure compatibility within surrounding uses and mitigate negative impacts to the public health, safety and general welfare associated with development of residentially zoned properties within the City. The General Plan includes the Land Use Element Goal L-1.2, which states “preserve open space and conserve

Ordinance 1320 Page 3
Approving MCTA 24-09
existing residential neighborhoods” and Goal L9.1, “preserve the visual identity and character of existing neighborhoods.” The addition of a rear yard setback will help to maintain open space area within single-family residential properties and the additional clean up items incorporated within the Residential Zones Generally, SF, SF-DR, and SFA Zones will help protect the character of existing neighborhoods. In addition, codifying already adopted City Council policies will assist with mitigating impacts to residential uses and will be consistent with Policy HE 1.1 of the Housing Element; “Preserve the character, scale, quality, and natural and environmental setting of established residential neighborhoods.” Furthermore, the proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 provides clarity on specific residential development standards that were previously unclear, unaddressed, or misinterpreted.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. ADOPTION. Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 amending Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 – Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 – S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 – SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 – SF-DR SingleFamily Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code to clarify the intent of certain sections, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and various clean up items as required as set forth in Exhibit A – D, attached hereto and incorporated herein, is hereby adopted.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 3. CEQA DETERMINATION. The City Council hereby finds and determines that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this ordinance may have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Thus, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 1506 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted at the duly designated posting places within the City and published once within 15 days after passage and adoption as may be required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of San Dimas hereby designated for that purpose; or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and certified copy of the text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk five days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and, within 15 days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published, the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk.

Ordinance 1320 Page 4
Approving MCTA 24-09
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas this 9 day of September, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________ ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk Jeff Malawy, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )§

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, Debra Black, City Clerk of the City of San Dimas, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance 1320 introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held of the City of San Dimas on the 9th, day of September, 2025, and thereafter passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the XX, day of XX, 2025. It has been published and posted pursuant to law.
___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Ordinance 1320 Page 5
Approving MCTA 24-09
Exhibit A
Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09
*New text changes are in Blue and Underlined
*Deleted text is in Red and Strikethrough
Chapter 18.20 - RESIDENTIAL ZONES GENERALLY
Sections:

18.20.010 Applicability.

18.20.020 Prohibition.

18.20.030 Recreational vehicle, boat and trailer limitations.

18.20.040 Material storage.

18.20.050 Hogs.

18.20.060 Animals.

18.20.070 Accessory structures.

18.20.080 Canopy, vehicle covers and other membrane structures.

18.20.090 Carports.

18.20.100 Fences and walls.

18.20.110 Fireplaces.

18.20.120 Flagpoles and flags.

18.20.130 Home care facilities.

18.20.140 Landscaping.

18.20.150 Lighting.

18.20.160 Mechanical equipment and screening.

18.20.170 Outdoor storage and storage containers.

18.20.180 Refuse storage.

18.20.190 Slopes.

18.20.200 Storage sheds.

18.20.210 Swimming pools, spas, rockscapes, and pool equipment.

18.20.220 Utilities.

18.20.010 Applicability.

As used in this chapter, “residential zones” means zones SF, SFA, SFDR, SFH, AL, MFD, MF, MF-30, and MF-D, and those specific plans or other zones which permit or conditionally permit residential uses, unless otherwise noted in this chapter. (Ord. 1226 § 1, 2014; Ord. 931 § 3, 1990; Ord. 37 § 201, 1961)

Ordinance 1320 Page 6
Approving MCTA 24-09

18.20.020 Prohibition.

A. A person shall not use any premises in any residential zone except as hereinafter specifically permitted by this chapter and subject to all regulations and conditions enumerated in this chapter.

B. Short Term Rentals. For the purposes of this section, the term “short-term rentals” shall mean the rental of any residential dwelling unit for a period of less than thirty (30) days. (Ord. 37 § 202, 1961)

18.20.030 Recreational vehicle, boat and trailer limitations.

The provisions of Section 18.156.100 of this title shall apply for parking or storage of a recreational vehicle, trailer, boat, truck camper, or camper shell. No recreational vehicle, trailer, boat, truck camper, or camper shell in any residential zone, except in an authorized trailer park, shall be used for living purposes, except as provided in the provisions of this title dealing with single-family residential zones. (Ord. 1188 § 1, 2009; Ord. 37 § 203, 1961)

18.20.040 Material storage.

In any building project, during construction and sixty fifteen days thereafter, property in a residential zone may be used for the storage of materials used in the construction of the individual buildings in the project and for the contractor’s temporary office. (Ord. 37 § 204, 1961)

18.20.050 Hogs.

A person shall not keep or maintain any live pig or hog of any age in any residential zone, whether such pig or hog is kept or maintained for the personal use of the occupant or otherwise. (Ord. 37 § 205, 1961)

18.20.060 Animals.

A. Household pets may be kept as an incidental use in residential zones under the following conditions:

1. Such pets shall not be kept in such number or under such conditions that create a neighborhood nuisance from noise, odors, dust or appearance.

2. Not more than three adult dogs or cats or any combination thereof may be kept.

3. Not more than three small animals, such as guinea pigs, rabbits, hamsters, or white mice, or any combination thereof, may be kept.

4. Not more than a total of fifteen song birds such as canaries, parakeets, and finches, parrots, or similar birds typically kept indoors as household pets shall of any combination may be kept.

5. Fowl may be kept as household pets only as described under the following circumstances:

Ordinance 1320 Page 7
Approving MCTA 24-09
a. Fowl kept as household pets may only be kept on lots five thousand square feet in area or greater.
i. On lots ranging from five thousand square feet to ten thousand nine hundred ninety-nine square feet in size, chickens (hens only) may be kept at a maximum total of four. ii. On lots ranging from eleven thousand square feet to twenty thousand square feet in size, chickens (hens only), ducks, and geese may be kept at a maximum total combination of four fowl.
iii. On lots twenty thousand and one square feet or larger, chickens (hens only), ducks, and geese may be kept at a maximum total combination of fifteen fowl. b. Fowl kept as household pets may only be kept as an incidental use to a detached, single-family residence in zones which permit single-family residential uses. Fowl are not permitted on multiple-family properties or on attached duplex type developments. c. Fowl kept as household pets may be kept as pets and for egg-laying purposes for the sole use of the residents of the property. On-site slaughter and selling or distributing of eggs is prohibited in conjunction with the keeping of fowl for household pets. d. An appropriate coop enclosure must be provided to house fowl with a minimum of four square feet per fowl. Coops may not exceed six feet in height or one hundred twenty square feet in area and must comply with the setback requirements for accessory structures in the zone they are located in as well as required distance separations as required by the County Health Code and as subsection C, and in no case shall coops be located closer than five feet to a property line or be visible from the public right-of-way. When allowed outside their coops, fowl must be kept within adequate fences no greater than six feet in height so that they do not have access to neighboring property. Fowl must be kept inside their coops between dusk and dawn. e. Clean water must be provided for all fowl, and an appropriately sized water source for bathing must be provided for ducks and geese.
f. Feed for fowl must be stored in rodent proof containers and feeders. g. Fowl must be kept in a sanitary manner and in accordance with all County Health Code requirements.

6. No venomous animals nor any animal that cannot be or is not actually prevented from invading or becoming a nuisance to neighboring premises may be kept.

B. The keeping of roosters and peacocks for any use is prohibited in the city.

C. All animals shall be properly housed at a distance of not less than thirty-five feet from any residence. If allowed outside their houses, animals shall be kept within adequate fences so that they do not have access to neighboring property.

D. Homing pigeons which are not kept or raised for the market or other commercial purposes, may be kept and liberated for exercise or racing within not less than thirty-five feet from any door, window or other opening of any dwelling.

1. Definition. “Homing pigeon” means a pigeon trained to return home from a distance. Such homing pigeons can be identified by a seamless leg band issued by the American

Ordinance 1320 Page 8
Approving MCTA 24-09
Racing Pigeon Union and marked with the letters AU and the figures designating the year issued and serial number.

2. A permit in writing authorizing the keeping and liberating for exercise and racing of such homing pigeons shall be obtained from the planning department. Each application for a permit to keep and liberate for exercise and racing of homing pigeons shall be made upon forms to be furnished for that purpose by the city signed by the applicant and filed with the city. No such application shall be received for filing unless accompanied by a filing fee of five dollars.

23. A permit to keep hHoming pigeons for exercise and racing shall be issued by the city subject to and upon compliance by the applicant subject to comply with the following conditions:
a. All feed for such homing pigeons shall be stored in containers which offer protection against rodents;
b. All food scraps and droppings shall be removed from the premises at least once a week and disposed of in a sanitary manner;
c. The lofts or pigeon houses where such homing pigeons are kept shall be soundly constructed, properly maintained and adequately landscaped to blend with and conform to the surrounding area;
d. The lofts or pigeon houses shall be maintained in a sanitary condition and in compliance with the health regulations of the city and those promulgated by the state racing pigeon organization;
e. The city or its duly authorized representative shall have the right to inspect each loft and pigeon house at such times as it shall deem advisable; f. No more than one hundred fifty pigeons, inclusive of nestlings, shall be kept on any one lot or parcel of ground located within the city.

4. Subject to a finding by the director of planning of compliance with all city requirements, each permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be valid for a period of one year and shall be renewable on the payment to the city of a renewal fee in the sum of five dollars annually.

5. The planning director may revoke any permit granted under this section after a hearing subsequent to ten days’ written notice to the permittee if a material violation of the permit has occurred. Anyone aggrieved by the decision of the planning director may within ten days after receipt of notice of the planning director’s decision appeal the decision in writing to the planning commission. (Ord. 1226 § 1, 2014; Ord. 368 § 1, 1972; Ord. 120 § 2, 1964; Ord. 37 § 206, 1961)

18.20.070 Accessory structures.

Accessory structures, as defined in Chapter 18.08, with the exception of storage sheds pursuant to Section 18.20.200, must be subject to the following standards:

A. Accessory structures must comply with the setback, lot coverage, and all applicable development standards of the underlying zone.

Ordinance 1320 Page 9
Approving MCTA 24-09
B. Corner Lot.

1. No detached accessory structure in any residential zone shall be located at a distance less than ten feet from the street side yard property line.

2. No detached garage in any residential zone shall be located at a distance less than twenty feet from the side street property line when the garage door faces the street.

C. No more than one room shall be allowed within an accessory structure, with the exception of a bathroom.

D. Kitchens are prohibited within any accessory structure with the exception of properties located within an MF zone for clubhouse or community room type uses.

E. Accessory structures shall be consistent with the exterior architectural style and exterior appearance of the primary structure.

F. No more than three accessory structures are permitted on any residentially zoned property with the exception of properties located within an MF zone.

18.20.080 Canopy, vehicle covers and other membrane structures.

For the purposes of this section, the term “canopy” or “vehicle cover” or “membrane structure” shall mean a sheet of flexible material, fabric, or membrane such as nylon, plastic, or other similar material that is supported by or attached to a frame made of fiberglass, metal, wood, or plastic or any other similar material, and generally used for the shielding or protection of vehicles or other equipment stored outside. For the purposes of this section, the term “temporary” shall mean a maximum duration of six months within a twelve month period.

A. Membrane structures may be used to provide temporary shade or shelter for miscellaneous items and as an incidental use in residential zones under the following conditions:

1. Not be allowed in any required setback areas in any zone.

2. Shall be located behind the main building line fronting on the street including corner lots.

2. Not exceed a maximum height of twelve feet in any zone.

18.20.90 Carports.

For the purposes of this section, the term “carport” shall mean a permanent roofed structure open on at least three (3) sides used for automobile shelter only. Carports must comply with the setback, lot coverage, and all applicable development standards of the underlying zone, in addition to the following development standards:

A. Size.
i. A minimum dimension of ten feet by twenty feet measured from the interior of structural supports.
ii. A carport must not exceed 600 square feet in area, measured from the exterior of the structural supports.

Ordinance 1320 Page 10
Approving MCTA 24-09
iii. Eaves shall not exceed 24 inches.
iv. Structural supports must measure a minimum of 8-inch x 8-inch in size.

B. Height.
i. A carport must not exceed 16 feet in height. An additional two feet in height is permitted, solely, to accommodate a roof pitch on a carport that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.

C. Corner Lot.

1. No detached carport in any residential zone shall be located at a distance less than twenty feet from the side street property line when access into the carport faces the street.

D. Carports shall be behind the front main building line of single-family residences with a sideyard facing garage.

E. Carports shall be consistent with the architectural style, exterior finishes and materials, and appearance of the primary structure.

F. Roof design and pitch shall be consistent with that of the primary structure. Flat roofs shall not be allowed, unless the primary roof design of the primary structure consists of a flat roof.

G. Carports may be attached or detached. If attached, it shall comply with the setback requirements of the structure it is attached to.

H. A carport may only be constructed or maintained on a lot as an accessory structure to the primary use allowed on the subject site.

I. Carports shall not be used for outdoor storage.

18.20.100 Fences and walls.

Fence and wall construction materials shall consist of wood or decorative tubular steel/wrought iron, vinyl, solid decorative masonry (i.e. slump stone, split face, CMU with applied stucco finish, brick or stone veneer) and have a decorative cap. Plain/precision cinder block is not permitted unless the subject property already is developed with the same block on at least fifty percent of its total side and rear property lines.

A. Permitted.

1. Fences, and walls not over forty-two inches in height shall be permitted in any required front yard setback.

2. Fences, and walls not greater than six feet in height on or within all rear and side property lines, and on or to the rear of all front setback lines. a. For the purposes of this section, when a difference in grade exists between two properties, the wall height is measured from the lowest grade, to the top of the wall. In no case shall the total wall height on the side and rear, exceed six feet. In areas with steeper slopes, a succession of smaller retaining walls must be used over one large retaining wall to prevent the appearance of massive-looking retaining walls.

3. Development of new or existing lot.

Ordinance 1320 Page 11
Approving MCTA 24-09
New or existing lots being developed/redeveloped with a new residence shall construct a decorative masonry block wall (i.e. slump stone, split face, CMU with applied stucco finish, brick or stone veneer) and have a decorative cap.
a. Walls not greater than six feet in height shall be required on or within all rear and side property lines up to the rear of the front yard setback. b. Walls not over forty-two inches in height may be permitted in any required front yard setback.

4. Vacant lot.
a. Must be secured by temporary fencing set back from all street adjacent property lines at a minimum of ten feet but not more than twenty feet. The first ten feet area shall be landscaped and irrigated at the discretion of the Director of Community Development. b. May require fencing (decorative tubular steel/wrought iron) to address public safety concerns at the discretion of the Director of Community Development.

5. Corner lot.
a. Fences, walls, and gates within the required street side yard setback are allowed up to six feet in height measured from the street side face of the wall. Fences within the front yard setback shall be no higher than forty-two inches.
b. Fences, walls, and gates shall be setback a minimum of 18 inches from the street side property line, unless a property-adjacent landscaped parkway exists, then the fence, wall and gate my be placed at the property line.
c. The area between the street side property line and the fence or wall shall have an appropriate irrigation system and decorative landscaping (shrubs, ground cover, flowers, plants, etc.).

6. Sloped lot.
a. No solid fencing or walls are permitted within the slope area (at or greater than a 2:1 slope).

Ordinance 1320 Page 12
Approving MCTA 24-09
b. Fencing may encroach into the slope area a maximum distance from the top of the finished grade of the house down to a point where a six-foot maximum high fence is flush with the finished grade of the house, or at the property line on the slope. c. Retaining walls may go the full extent of the lot width. d. A fence or wall greater than 10 feet in height may be allowed due to conditions on the property or physical hazards, such as frequent inundation, erosion, excavation or grade separation when such are determined by the Director of Community Development to be dangerous to health or safety except for properties within SF-H Zone, which may allow for 12 feet in height.

B. Prohibited. The following types of fence and wall materials are prohibited; chain-link, corrugated metal, metal slat, railroad ties, exposed block walls and fences, security fencing (i.e. commercial wire, razor wire, concertina wire, and/or similar products) except chain-link fencing associated with construction activity with an active building permit on file and vacant lots.

C. Existing Nonconforming Fences and Walls. For existing walls and fences that do not comply with this section, minor repairs must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the Planning Division.

18.20.110 Fireplaces.

Detached exterior fireplaces shall not be greater than eight feet in height, shall not be closer than five feet to all rear and side property lines, and shall not be located within the front yard setback. All building code requirements shall be met.

18.20.120 Flagpoles and flags.

A maximum of one flagpole shall be allowed per residential lot. The height of the flagpole shall not exceed twenty-five feet, measured from finished grade to top of pole. A maximum of two 6’-0” MAX.

FINISHED GRADE OF HOUSE

VARIES WITH ANGLE OF
SLOPE

WROUGHT IRON
FENCE

Ordinance 1320 Page 13
Approving MCTA 24-09
flags on a flagpole may be displayed at any given time. The maximum size for a flag shall not exceed five feet by eight feet.

18.20.130 Home care facilities.

The provisions of Chapter 18.142.060 of this title shall apply.

18.20.140 Landscaping and hardscape.

All front yards and street side yards shall be maintained with landscaping. Such landscaping shall be maintained in a neat, clean, and weed free manner. In addition to lawn, trees, shrubs, flowers and similar vegetation, required landscaping may include decorative hardscape, drought tolerant xeriscape, and artificial turf. Front yards and any other areas visible to the public including rear yards on through lots should be maintained on a regular basis in a clean and neat fashion. This includes the parkway area. All new and rehabilitated landscaping including hardscape must comply with the provisions of Chapter 18.14.030.

18.20.150 Lighting.

All lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining areas and the public rightof-way.

18.20.160 Mechanical equipment and screening.

A. Portable window air conditioners/heating units shall only be allowed within a window opening and not within a wall plane.

B. Any equipment on the ground visible from the public right-of-way, must be screened. The method of screening must be architecturally compatible to the existing structure it serves in terms of material, color, shape, and size. The screening design must blend with the building design.

Where individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desirable. No equipment shall be roof-mounted except for HVAC units, swamp coolers, or other mechanical equipment mounted within a recessed equipment well, that completely screens the equipment.

1. Water heaters located on the exterior of a building must be appropriately screened from view from adjacent properties and the public right-of-way within an enclosure designed as part of the building. The enclosure shall match the exterior finish and color of the structure it serves. Exterior metal enclosures are prohibited.

2. Tankless water heaters shall be located behind the front main building line. If visible from the public right-of-way, a cover shall be required to conceal the exposed pipes.

18.20.170 Outdoor storage and storage containers.

A. Outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, and materials.

1. Outdoor storage areas shall be screened from public view through the use of building walls, decorative screen walls, view obstructing access gates with decorative screening, or combination thereof.

Ordinance 1320 Page 14
Approving MCTA 24-09

2. Items stored outside, may be stacked no higher than six feet.

3. No materials stored outside shall be stored on the subject property in such form or manner that may be transferred off the lot by natural causes or forces (i.e. storm water runoff, wind, etc.)

4. No construction materials are permitted without an active building permit.

B. Storage Containers.

1. Storage containers i.e. shipping containers, sea cargo containers, PODS, or other such containers are not permitted in any residential zones, except as follows:
a. A moving POD container may be allowed on an approved driveway or in a side or rear yard on a temporary basis for a period not to exceed thirty days in any twelve-month period; b. In conjunction with work being done under a valid building permit for an approved addition, remodel, or similar project. The storage container shall be removed prior to the building permit being finaled. If the building permit has expired, the storage container shall be removed within 30 days from the date of expiration.

2. No storage container may be placed on the public right-of-way at any time unless the required encroachment permit has been issued by the Public Works Department and a copy of the permit has been attached to the unit. Any such container found on the public right-of-way without having the required encroachment permit may be subject to immediate removal at the owner’s expense.

18.20.180 Refuse storage.

All outdoor trash, garbage, refuse and recyclables storage shall not be visible from public right-ofway and be screened from view with solid material or fencing, and/or landscaping. Permanent storage space shall be provided on all lots created after 2024 for trash bin and other refuse storage.
a. For single-family zoned properties or properties that permit single-family residences, refuse storage spaces shall be located behind the front main building line, within the interior side yard, or in the rear yard. Further, such space shall not be less than five feet wide by nine feet long, and will be required to be a paved surface. A minimum of a four feet wide walkway shall be provided from the refuse storage area to the driveway or street/alley.

18.20.190 Sloped lots.

Sloped areas within residential lots shall be maintained in a clean fashion, be landscaped and not be bare. Any alteration of slopes is not allowed unless approved by the City. When slope maintenance standards exist in other sections of the Code, the most restrictive standards shall prevail.

Ordinance 1320 Page 15
Approving MCTA 24-09

18.20.200 Storage sheds.

Storage sheds are used to store a wide variety of items, including, but not limited to, tools, gardening supplies, arts and crafts, seasonal clothes, mementos, etc. Storage sheds must be detached from the main residence.

A. No permit is required for a storage shed that complies with all of the following:

1. Has no more than 120 square feet of floor area.

2. Is detached from any structure.

3. Is no more than twelve feet in height.

4. Does not have any utilities.

B. All storage sheds are subject to the following setback requirements:

1. Shall be located behind the front main building line of the house and be a minimum of two feet away from the side and rear property lines. The edge of the roof shall be a minimum of twelve inches away from property line to allow for onsite drainage.

2. May encroach into the required twelve-foot side yard setback; however, the shed(s) may be relocated to accommodate RV parking.

C. Lot Coverage.

1. The first three storage sheds that are under 120 square feet and that do not require a building permit are not subject to lot coverage requirements.

2. Additional storage sheds shall be counted towards the maximum lot coverage of the underlying zone.

18.20.210 Swimming pools, spas, rockscapes, and pool equipment.

A minimum five-foot setback from side, rear, and street side property lines shall be required for swimming pools, spas, rockscapes, and pool equipment.

18.20.220 Utilities.

All new and/or existing utilizes (water, electrical, gas, telecommunication, etc.) shall be installed underground for new development projects. On developed lots any new structures with utilities shall have them placed underground.

A. The maximum height of electric service masts shall not exceed five feet, or the minimum height needed to meet the building code clearance requirements for swimming pools; whichever is less.

Ordinance 1320 Page 16
Approving MCTA 24-09
Exhibit B
Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09
*New text changes are in Blue and Underlined
*Deleted text is in Red and Strikethrough
Chapter 18.24 - S-F SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE
Sections:

18.24.010 Purpose.

18.24.020 Uses permitted.

18.24.030 Uses permitted by conditional use permit.

18.24.040 Property development standards.

18.24.050 Property development standards involving side yard easements.

18.24.060 Modification of development standards.

18.24.010 Purpose.

The S-F single-family zone is intended to provide for the development of single-family residential homes at urban standards, with not more than one main dwelling unit permitted on any lot or parcel. (Ord. 412 § 2, 1973; Ord. 37 § 223.00, 1961)

18.24.020 Uses permitted.

A. Buildings, structures and land shall be used, and buildings and structures shall hereafter be erected, structurally altered or enlarged only for the following uses, plus such other uses as the commission may deem, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.192, to be similar and not more obnoxious or detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. All uses shall be subject to the property development standards in Section 18.24.040.

B. The following uses are permitted:

1. Primary Uses.
a. One sSingle-family residential dwelling units,
b. Manufactured housing on a permanent foundation in areas zoned S-F 7500;

2. Incidental Uses.
a. Home occupations, as described and regulated in Chapter 18.184 Home Based Businesses,
b. Household pets, as described and regulated in Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally,
c. Nonhabitable accessory buildings or structures, including, but not limited to, the following:
i. Private garage pursuant to Chapter 18.156, or carport ii. Carport,
iiiii. Garden greenhouse,

Ordinance 1320 Page 17
Approving MCTA 24-09
iiiiv. Recreation room,
ivv. Pool bathhouse.,
vi. Canopy, vehicle covers and other membrane structures, as described and regulated in Chapter 18.20.080 Residential Zones Generally.
vi. Outdoor storage and storage containers, as described and regulated in Chapter

18.20.170 Residential Zones Generally.
d. Accessory dwelling unit
e. Junior accessory dwelling unit.
f. Home care facilities, as described and regulated in Chapter 18.142.060 of this title shall apply.
g. Garage and yard sales, as described and regulated in Chapter 18.196 Temporary Uses. (Ord. 1226 § 1, 2014; Ord. 1062 § 1, 1996; Ord. 969 § 1, 1992; Ord. 747 § 1, 1981; Ord. 659 § 1, 1979; Ord. 565 § 2, 1977; Ord. 412 § 2, 1973; Ord. 37 § 223.02, 1961)

18.24.030 Uses permitted by conditional use permit.

The following uses may be permitted provided a conditional use permit is first obtained:

A. Single-Family Dwellings Which Utilize the Side Yard Easements Treatment per Code Section 18.24.050.

1. The side yard easements treatment refers to the grant of easements over required side yard areas to adjacent lots for open space purposes. It is the purpose of this use permitted by conditional use permit to provide added flexibility to the design of single-family dwellings on flat land. In order to further this purpose, dwellings shall be oriented to take maximum advantage of all private spaces surrounding them. Development plans permitted under this section shall be designed to insure compatibility with contiguous developments, so that wellplanned neighborhoods develop from creative and imaginative site planning.

2. In addition to the conditions required pursuant to Chapter 18.200, the property development standards of Section 18.24.040 shall apply.

B. Educational Institutions, Private and Public.

C. Churches and Religious Institutions.

1. Day care centers, day nurseries and nursery schools as an accessory use only.

D. Golf Courses and Country Clubs and Related Driving Ranges. Driving ranges unrelated to golf courses are not permitted. In approving a golf course, the city shall be granted an easement or other interest to assure the future use of the golf course or country club as such thereby preserving such uses as open spaces. Such easement or other interest may provide for termination at the expiration of the economic life of the project with the consent of the city. (Ord. 1062 § 1, 1996; Ord. 969 § 1, 1992; Ord. 807 § 1, 1984; Ord. 507 § 1, 1975; Ord. 412 § 2, 1973; Ord. 37 § 223.04, 1961)

18.24.030

18.24.040 Property development standards.

The following property development standards shall apply to all lands, buildings or structures in the S-F zone:

A. Lot Sizes. Each lot in the S-F zone shall have a minimum area measured in square feet as established by the zoning symbol, such as:

Ordinance 1320 Page 18
Approving MCTA 24-09
S-F 7,500
S-F 10,000
S-F 15,000
S-F 20,000
S-F 40,000
B. Density.

1. Density shall be based upon lot sizes and shall be determined by dividing the net usable area of the parcel to be subdivided or parcelized by the required lot area.

2. “Net usable area” is defined to be that area of a parcel exclusive of streets, alleys, pole portion from a flag lot, drainage courses and public utility easements exceeding ten feet in width.

C. Lot Dimensions. All lots hereafter created shall comply with the following minimum standards:

1. Width. Except as hereafter otherwise set forth, each lot shall have the following minimum width, measured at each and every point between two boundaries at either side of the lot which are perpendicular or approximately perpendicular to a public right-of-way upon which the lot has frontage or to which the lot has access:

Required Area (Square Feet) Minimum Width
Less than 7,5001 50 feet
7,5001 to 9,999 10,000 70 feet
10,0001 to 14,999 15,000 80 feet
15,0001 to 20,000 100 feet
20,0001 to 39,99940,000 150 feet
Greater than 40,0001 200 feet
The minimum width for a lot on a curvilinear street may be reduced by up to, but not more than, twenty percent, provided that the average width of such lot shall be equal to or greater than the minimum width otherwise required for that lot. The minimum width of a lot on a cul-de-sac may be reduced to thirty-five feet, provided that such lot expands to at least to the minimum width otherwise required.

The minimum width of a flag lot may be reduced to twenty feet, provided that this minimum width shall pertain solely to that portion of the flag lot (i.e. pole portion) upon which is located the right-of-way connecting the remainder of the flag lot to a public right-of-way, and further provided that the remainder of the flag lot shall meet the minimum width and area

Ordinance 1320 Page 19
Approving MCTA 24-09
otherwise required. The pole portion of a flag lot shall not be calculated as minimum required lot size. The pole portion shall be used for access only and shall not be used for the placement of any structures.

Figure 1. Flag Lot

2. Depth. There are no depth provisions.

D. Building Height.

1. No building or structure erected in this zone shall have a height greater than thirty-five feet or two stories, whichever is less, except that a steeple, spire or other similar projection above a building used primarily for religious purposes, may extend the total height of the structure and steeple, spire or other similar projection as high as forty-five feet, provided that the height of the steeple, spire or other similar projection is harmonious in design with the building or structure and with the surrounding neighborhood and a development plan is approved by the development plan review board in accordance with Chapter 18.12 of this title.

2. Where a building or structure is erected on sloping terrain having a twenty-five percent gradient or more, the height of the building or structure shall be measured from the average of the lowest point and the highest point of contact with the ground to the highest portion of the structure from the highest adjoining ground surface level at the base of the building or structure.

E. Yards.

Ordinance 1320 Page 20
Approving MCTA 24-09

1. Front. Each lot or parcel of land shall have a front yard of not less than twenty feet in depth.

2. Side. Each lot or parcel of land shall have a minimum twelve-foot side yard on the side of the lot closest to the driveway. The other side yard shall be a minimum of five feet. For side-facing garage, the Director of Community Development shall determine the placement of the twelve and five-foot setbacks on a case-by-case determination. The twelve-foot side yard shall be maintained exclusive of any structural or other physical encroachments other than eave overhangs or improvements which do not project more than twenty-four inches into the required yard. for the following:
i. Eave overhangs or improvements (i.e. bay windows, fireplaces), which do not project more than twenty-four inches,
ii. Mechanical equipment such as air conditioning units, water softeners, solar panel equipment boxes, and/or generators must be no closer than five feet from the side property line, screened from public view to the extent physically possible, and located behind the front main building line, or an existing gate and/or wall.
iii. Sheds which do not require a building permit (i.e. less than 120 square feet, no higher than 12 feet and do not have any utilities), shall have a two-foot side yard setback from the property line. The edge of the roof must also be a minimum of twelve inches setback from property line to allow for onsite drainage.
iv. Recreational Vehicle Storage. The provisions of Section 18.156.100 of this title shall apply.
v. The twelve-foot yard may be reduced behind the rear main building line to not less than five feet for open patios and other similar structures, pool equipment and swimming pools, and detached garages and accessory storage buildings which do not exceed one story in height. The floor area of such accessory buildings shall not exceed six hundred square feet.

3. Rear.
i. Regular Lots. Each lot or parcel of land shall have a minimum rear yard setback of ten feet for main habitable structures and five feet for accessory structures. The ten feet or five feet rear yard setback shall be maintained exclusive of any structural or other physical encroachments other than eave overhangs or improvements (i.e. bay windows, fireplaces), which do not project more than twenty-four inches into the required yard. ii. Alley Loaded Lots.
a. For garages accessed from the alley, the rear yard setback shall be three feet or twenty feet.
b. For garages not accessed from the alley and all other structures, the rear yard setback shall be five feet.
c. Eave overhangs or improvements (i.e. bay windows, fireplaces), which do not project more than twenty-four inches.
iii. Sheds which do not require a building permit (i.e. less than 120 square feet, no higher than 12 feet and do not have any utilities), shall have a two-foot rear yard setback from the

Ordinance 1320 Page 21
Approving MCTA 24-09
property line. The edge of roof must also be a minimum of twelve inches setback from property line to allow for onsite drainage.

4. 3. Corner Lots. The interior side yard shall be a minimum of twelve feet in width and the side yard abutting the street shall be a minimum of five feet in width. five feet in width and the side yard abutting the street shall be a minimum of ten feet in width. For corner lots where rear yard access is not available from the side street, the twelve-foot side yard, as required in this section, shall be provided in the interior side yard, and the side yard abutting the street shall be a minimum of ten feet in width.
a. Where a lot has been developed with a residential use prior to March 31, 2005, the ten-foot side yard abutting the street may be reduced to not less than five feet for in-ground swimming pools and/or spas that do not exceed one foot in height.

5. 4. When access to the twelve-foot side yard area is paved, a minimum side yard of three feet shall be maintained exclusive of paving adjacent to the property line. The three-foot side yard shall be improved with landscaping only within the required front yard setback.

6. 5. Each lot with an existing nonconforming dwelling unit may have additions placed at existing building setbacks with not less than five-foot side yards; except, where the required twelve-foot side yard exists on the original structure and can be maintained for any additions, or where the lot has legal access from a dedicated alley.

F. Ground Lot Coverage. The mMaximum ground lot coverage of all structures shall not exceed thirty-five percent of the total area of a the lot. Notwithstanding, the following:

1. Aany lot or parcel with a required area of less than seven thousand five hundred square feet pursuant to this chapter may have ground a lot coverage from thirty-five to no more than forty percent provided that all structures on the subject property do not exceed one story in height.

2. Lot coverage shall be calculated based on roof area and overhead structures such as dwelling units, garages, trellis, patios, and similar structures, but not patio slabs, hardscape, driveways, swimming pools or spas, and shall be measured from the exterior walls and posts of all structures.

3. For storage sheds, the provisions of Chapter 18.20.200 shall apply.

G. Fences and Walls. The provisions of Chapter 18.20.100 shall apply.

1. Required. A fence or wall six feet in height or greater may be required due to conditions on the property or physical hazards, such as frequent inundation, erosion, excavation or grade separation when such are determined by the planning director to be dangerous to health or safety.

2. Permitted. Except as provided in this chapter, fences and walls not greater than six feet in height shall be permitted on or within all rear and side property lines, and on or to the rear of all front setback lines. Fences and walls not over forty-two inches in height shall be permitted in any required front yard abutting a street and in any required side yard abutting a street.

Ordinance 1320 Page 22
Approving MCTA 24-09
a. Where a lot has been developed with a residential use prior to March 31, 2005, a fence or wall not greater than six feet in height shall be permitted on or within the side yard abutting a street.
b. Landscaping shall not be installed to circumvent the intent of this section H. Off-Street Parking. The provisions of Chapter 18.156 shall apply. No structure for parking purposes shall be located closer than twenty feet to the property line. Any garage or carport having an opening facing a street shall be provided with a garage door.

I. Recreational Vehicle Storage. Permanent access and storage space shall be provided on all lots or parcels created after June 13, 1973 for recreational vehicles, trailers, boats, or camper shells. Such storage space shall be located behind the main building line, within the interior side yard, or in the rear yard. Further, such space shall be not less than ten feet wide by twenty-five feet long, and, when actually used for storage of recreational vehicles, tThe provisions of Section 18.156.100 of this title shall also apply.

J. Signs. The provisions of Chapter 18.152 shall apply.

K. Minimum Residential Structure Size. Each residential structure in the S-F zone shall have a minimum floor area as set forth below:

1. S-F 7,500 – 9,999

18.24.040
Two bedrooms 1,050 square feet
Three bedrooms 1,200 square feet
For each additional bedroom 150 square feet

3. S-F 10,000 (and greater).

Two bedrooms 1,400 square feet
Three bedrooms 1,600 square feet
For each additional bedroom 150 square feet
(Ord. 1188 § 2, 2009; Ord. 1148 § 1, 2005; Ord. 1071 §§ 1, 2, 1997; Ord. 899 § 1, 1989; Ord. 797 § 2, 1983; Ord. 771 § 1, 1982; Ord. 631 § 1, 1978; Ord. 565 § 3, 1977; Ord. 526 § 1, 1976; Ord. 412 § 2, 1973; Ord. 37 § 223.06, 1961)

18.24.050 Property development standards involving side yard easements.

The following property development standards shall apply to single-family developments utilizing side yard easements.

Ordinance 1320 Page 23
Approving MCTA 24-09
A. Yards.

1. Front. There shall be a minimum front yard setback of twenty feet with a straight-in driveway, and a fifteen-foot setback with a swing-in driveway.

2. Side. There shall be a side yard of five feet minimum on each side of the dwelling, one of which shall be granted as an easement to the adjacent neighbor to accomplish a minimum ten-foot side yard on one side of each lot.

3. Rear. There shall be a rear yard setback of ten feet minimum.

3.4. The house design and floor plan shall take advantage of the space created.

B. Projections Into Rear or Side Yards.

1. Eaves, balconies, patio roofs and exterior stairways may project not more than fifty percent into the required yard.

2. Fireplaces may project twenty-four inches into a required yard.

C. Walls and Fences. Retaining walls, where necessary, garden walls and fences shall be constructed between all lots to guarantee privacy and encourage maximum use of outdoor areas.

D. Maximum Lot Coverage. Structures and paving shall not exceed sixty percent of the individual lot area.

E. Off-Street Parking. The provisions of Chapter 18.156 shall apply.

F. Signs. The provisions of Chapter 18.152 shall apply.

G. Utilities. All utility services shall be installed underground.

H. Lighting. All lighting shall be located in a manner such that it will not reflect upon adjoining areas.

I. Refuse Storage. A provision shall be made for individual or collective storage containers on the development plan.

J. Recreational Vehicle Storage. The provisions of Section 18.156.100 of this title shall apply. There shall be a common area for the parking of trailers, boats, campers, camper shells, motorhomes and similar vehicles equal to one ten-foot by twenty-foot storage space for each three dwelling units or fraction thereof. Adequate access and maneuverability shall be provided.

The area shall be enclosed with a six-foot-high or greater, decorative masonry wall with perimeter screening landscaping. Landscaping shall include trees and shrubs and shall be sprinklered by an electric remote control sprinkler system. Gates shall be constructed of wood.

The area shall be adequately lighted, provided with yard drains for adequate drainage, and shall have electrical outlets and hose bibs.

K. Open Green Areas. A minimum of forty percent of the total lot area shall be usable open space with no dimension less than ten feet, which shall not include streets, vehicular accessways or parking areas. (Ord. 507 § 2, 1975; Ord. 37 § 223.07, 1961)

Ordinance 1320 Page 24
Approving MCTA 24-09

18.24.060 Modification of development standards.

The purpose of this section is to promote residential amenities beyond those expected in a conventional development, to achieve greater flexibility in design, and to encourage wellplanned neighborhoods through creative and imaginative planning as a unit. This section permits flexibility in site design and variety in development. This section shall apply to subdivisions only.

A. Planning Commission Review.

1. Where the planning commission finds that the design quality, efficiency of land use and residential character of the development is enhanced, well integrated and properly oriented, the commission may modify the development standards set forth in Section 18.24.040.

B. Application for Modification.

1. The developer or property owner shall request, in writing, the desired modifications.

Such request shall:
a. State reasons for the request and show how the purposes of Section 18.24.040 are fulfilled;
b. Include development plans, elevations and renderings; c. Provide such other data, plans and evidence as the commission may deem necessary to reach a determination. (Ord. 412 § 2, 1973; Ord. 37 § 223.08, 1961)

Ordinance 1320 Page 25
Approving MCTA 24-09
Exhibit C
Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09
*New text changes are in Blue and Underlined
*Deleted text is in Red and Strikethrough
Chapter 18.35 - SF-DR SINGLE-FAMILY DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL ZONE Sections:

18.35.010 Purpose.

18.35.020 Uses permitted.

18.35.030 Uses permitted by conditional use permit.

18.35.040 Property development standards.

18.35.050 General development standards.

18.35.060 Development plan review.

18.35.070 Design guidelines.

18.35.080 Provisions for existing residential and noncommercial improvements.

18.35.090 Provisions for existing commercial uses.

18.35.010 Purpose.

The SF-DR single-family downtown residential zone is intended to provide for the development of single-family residential homes within the downtown residential neighborhood area, with not more than one dwelling unit permitted on any lot or parcel. (Ord. 1007 § 1, 1993)

18.35.020 Uses permitted.

In the SF-DR zone, building, structures and land shall be used, and buildings and structures shall hereafter be erected, structurally altered or enlarged only for the uses enumerated below. All uses shall be subject to the property development and general development standards in Sections 18.35.040 and 18.35.050.

A. Primary Uses.

1. One sSingle-family residential dwelling unit.

2. Home care facilities, as described and regulated in Chapter 18.142.060 Home Care Facilities.

B. Incidental Uses.

1. Accessory dwelling unit;

2. Junior accessory dwelling unit;

1.3. Home occupations;

Ordinance 1320 Page 26
Approving MCTA 24-09

2. 4. Household pets as described and regulated in Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally.

5. Garage and yard sales, as described and regulated in Chapter 18.196 Temporary Uses.

C. 6. Nonhabitable accessory buildings or structures, including, but not limited to, the following:

1. a. Private garage pursuant to Chapter 18.156;

2. b. Carport;

3. c. Garden greenhouse;

4. d. Recreation room;

5. e. Workshop;

6. f. Freestanding patio covers and decks;
g. Swimming pools and spas.
h. Canopy, vehicle covers, and other membrane structures, as described and regulated in Chapter 18.20.080 Residential Zones Generally.
i. Outdoor storage and storage containers, as described and regulated in Chapter

18.20.170 Residential Zones Generally.
(Ord. 1226 § 1, 2014; Ord. 1007 § 1, 1993)

18.35.030 Uses permitted by conditional use permit.

The following uses shall be permitted in the SF-DR zone pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.200:

A. Churches, convents and/or rectories;
B. Libraries;
C. Educational institutions (public or private);
D. Day care centers;
E. Public safety facilities, including but not limited to fire and law enforcement stations; F. Public utility substations;
G. Public or private utility service facility, including vehicle, equipment and material parking/storage and related activities. (Ord. 1007 § 1, 1993)

18.35.040 Property development standards.

The following property development standards shall apply to all land and buildings in the SF-DR zone.

Ordinance 1320 Page 27
Approving MCTA 24-09
A. Lot Area.

1. Minimum Lot Size. Minimum seven thousand square feet required.

2. Five Six Thousand to Seven Six Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety-Nine Square Feet.

Any lot with an area less than seven thousand square feet, but greater than or equal to six five thousand square feet, held under separate ownership of record on the effective date of the ordinance codified in this section, may be developed in accordance with standards applicable to lots containing seven thousand square feet without reference to lot width or depth requirements.

Existing structures may be modified, altered or added onto subject to compliance with the development standards of this chapter.

3. Less than Six Thousand Square Feet. No new development shall be permitted on parcels with less than six thousand square feet. Existing structures may be modified, altered or added onto subject to compliance with the development standards of this chapter.

3.4. Parcels Abutting Remnant Railroad Parcels. If a development parcel is greater than six thousand square feet, but less than seven thousand square feet and abuts a remnant railroad parcel, the property owner of the development parcel shall enter into an agreement with the city to assume ownership, and merge, the two parcels prior to the issuance of a building permit.

B. Lot Dimensions.

1. Width. Each lot shall have a minimum width of fifty feet, measured at each and every point between two boundaries at either side of the lot which are perpendicular, or approximately perpendicular, to a public right-of-way upon which the lot has frontage or to which the lot has access.
a. The minimum width of a flag lot may be reduced to twenty feet, provided that this minimum width shall pertain solely to that portion of the flag lot upon which is located at the right-of-way connecting the remainder of the flag lot to a public right-of-way. b. The remainder of the flag lot shall meet the minimum width, depth and area requirements of this chapter. The pole driveway portion of a flag lot shall not be calculated as minimum required parcel lot size. The pole portion shall be used for access only and shall not be used for the placement of any structures.

Ordinance 1320 Page 28
Approving MCTA 24-09
Figure 1. Flag Lot

2. Depth. Minimum one hundred twenty-five forty feet.

C. Building Height.

1. No building or structure erected in this zone shall have a height greater than thirty feet or two stories, whichever is less, except as provided in Section 18.35.070 of this chapter.

2. Exception. A steeple, spire or other similar projection above a building used primarily for religious purposes, may extend the total height of the structure and steeple, spire or other similar projection as high as forty-five feet; provided, that the height of the steeple, spire or other similar projection is harmonious in design with the building or structure and with the surrounding neighborhood and a development plan is approved by the development plan review board in accordance with Chapter 18.12 of this title.

D. Yards.

1. Front. There shall be a front yard setback of twenty feet.

2. Sides. Each lot or parcel of land shall have a minimum setback of five feet on one side and ten feet on the other side.

Ordinance 1320 Page 29
Approving MCTA 24-09
a. Detached Garages and Accessory Buildings. There shall be a minimum side yard setback of five feet. Zero lot line may be utilized provided that the minimum setback on the other side is ten feet.
b. Each lot with an existing nonconforming dwelling unit or structure which otherwise meets current building and zoning requirements, may have additions placed at existing building setbacks with not less than five-foot side yards; except where the required ten-foot side yard exists pursuant to subsection (D)(2) on the original structure and can be maintained for any additions.

3. Corner Lots. The interior side yard shall be a minimum of five feet in width, and the side yard abutting the street shall be a minimum of ten feet in width.

4. Rear. The minimum rear yard shall be three feet.
i. Regular Lots. Each lot or parcel of land shall have a minimum rear yard setback of ten feet for main habitable structures and five feet for accessory structures. The ten feet or five feet rear yard setback shall be maintained exclusive of any structural or other physical encroachments other than eave overhangs or improvements (i.e. which do not project more than twenty-four inches into the required yard.
ii. Alley Loaded Lots.
a. For garages accessed from the alley, the rear yard setback shall be three feet or twenty feet.
b. For garages not accessed from the alley and all other structures, the rear yard setback shall be five feet.
c. Eave overhangs or improvements (i.e. bay windows, fireplaces), which do not project more than twenty-four inches.
iii. Sheds which do not require a building permit (i.e. less than 120 square feet, no higher than 12 feet and do not have any utilities), shall have a two-foot rear yard setback from the property line. The edge of roof must also be a minimum of twelve inches setback from property line to allow for onsite drainage.

5. Projections into Required Yards.
a. Eaves on main dwelling unit and accessory structures, balconies, fireplaces, bay windows, and exterior stairways may not project more than twenty- four inches into the required yard.
b. Mechanical equipment such as air conditioning units, water softeners, solar panel equipment boxes, and/or generators must be no closer than five feet from the side property line, screened from public view to the extent physically possible, and located behind the front main building line, or an existing gate and/or wall.
c. Sheds which do not require a building permit (i.e. less than 120 square feet, no higher than 12 feet and do not have any utilities), may encroach into the side and rear yard setbacks; however, they must be a minimum of two feet away from the side and rear property lines. The edge of the roof must be a minimum of twelve inches away from property line to allow for onsite drainage.

Ordinance 1320 Page 30
Approving MCTA 24-09
E. Lot Coverage. The maximum lot coverage of all structures shall not exceed thirty-five percent of the total area of the lot or parcel. Notwithstanding, any lot or parcel with a required area of less than seven thousand square feet pursuant to this chapter may have lot coverage from thirty-five to no more than forty percent provided that all structures on the subject property do not exceed one story. For the purposes of this section, structural lot coverage shall include patio covers, trellises, carports or nonhabitable accessory structures, but not patio slabs, hardscape, driveways, swimming pools or spas, and shall be measured from the exterior walls and post for structures. For storage sheds, the provisions of Chapter 18.20.200 shall apply. (Ord. 1007 § 1, 1993)

18.35.050 General development standards.

The following general development standards shall apply to all land, uses, buildings and structures within the SF-DR zone:

A. Off-Street Parking. The provisions of Chapter 18.156 of this title shall apply. Any structure provided for parking purposes shall comply with the applicable development standards of this chapter.

B. Alley Access. If there is alley access for the parcel, a detached garage shall face the alley. If the garage is located twenty feet or closer to the alley, then an automatic garage door opener is required. Automatic garage door openers are optional if the garage is located twenty feet or greater from the alley, or has a swing-in garage design.

C. Recreational Vehicle Storage. The provisions of Section 18.156.100 of this title shall apply. Permanent storage space may be provided on all lots or parcels for trailers, boats, motorhomes and camper shells. Such space shall be located behind the main building line, within the side or rear yard setback. Such space shall measure a minimum of ten feet wide by twenty-five feet long, shall be paved with Portland cement concrete at least three and one-half inches thick.

D. Utilities. All utilities shall be installed underground. The provisions of Section

18.20.220 of this title shall apply.

E. Refuse Storage. All outdoor trash, garbage, refuse and recyclables storage shall be screened from public view. The provisions of Section 18.20.180 of this title shall apply.

F. Signs. The provisions of Chapter 18.152 shall apply.

G. Landscaping. All front yards shall be maintained with landscaping. Such landscaping shall be maintained in a neat, clean, and weed and disease free manner. In addition to lawn, trees, shrubs, flowers and similar vegetation, required landscaping may include decorative hardscape and drought tolerant xeriscape. The provisions of Section 18.20.140 of this title shall apply.

H. Fences and Walls. Fence and wall construction materials shall consist of masonry, wood or decorative tubular steel/wrought iron.

1. Permitted. Fences and walls not greater than six feet in height shall be permitted on or within all rear, side, or secondary street frontage of a corner lot, and on or to the rear of all front

Ordinance 1320 Page 31
Approving MCTA 24-09
setback lines. Fences and walls not over forty-two inches in height shall be permitted in the required front yard.

2. Retaining Walls and Slopes. For the purposes of this section, when a difference in grade exists, the total wall height of six feet shall be measured from the average point of the lowest grade and highest grade, to the top of wall. In no case shall the total wall height, as measured from the lowest grade, exceed eight feet. The provisions of Section 18.20.100 of this title shall apply. (Ord. 1007 § 1, 1993)

18.35.060 Development plan review.

Before any building or structure is erected in this zone, or building modifications performed, a development plan shall be reviewed and approved pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.12 of this title. (Ord. 1007 § 1, 1993)

18.35.070 Design guidelines.

The single-family downtown residential zone contains many examples of historical architecture and quality residential design. The following design considerations should be incorporated during the design process for new, remodeled and residential additions, as referenced in the city towncore design guidelines.

A. Historical. Examples of residential architectural design within the single-family downtown residential zone reflect architecture typical of the early California period. Such styles include Craftsman Bungalow, Queen Anne, Colonial Revival and Spanish Colonial Revival.

B. Architectural. Development, additions and remodels within the single-family downtown residential zone should be compatible with the surrounding and existing residences as well as reflect early California architecture. Consistency of building materials and colors, as well as historical integrity, should be reflected in new construction, remodels and additions. Additions, remodels and similar improvements to historically significant residential structures are subject to review by the review authority in accordance with Chapter 18.12 of this title.development plan review board pursuant to code section 18.12.

C. Incentives. Development which the development plan review board determines demonstrates architectural quality and historical integrity shall be eligible for modification to the following development standards:

1. Required Yards. A maximum of a twenty percent reduction in required yards for the placement of verandas, porches, balconies, windows, and piers, columns, posts and similar architectural features.

2. Building Height. An increase in the maximum building height to thirty-five feet for elements such as raised foundations, turrets, roof pitch and similar architectural features which are historically significant and consistent with the city towncore design guidelines. (Ord. 1007 § 1, 1993)

Ordinance 1320 Page 32
Approving MCTA 24-09

18.35.080 Provisions for existing residential and noncommercial improvements.

Existing residential and noncommercial improvements built in conformance with building and zoning codes in effect at the time of construction may be maintained as currently existing, pursuant to the following provisions:

A. Such existing improvements and site conditions may be repaired, maintained, repainted, remodeled, enlarged and/or the landscaping upgraded, without conforming with Section 18.35.020.

B. Residential and noncommercial uses made nonconforming pursuant to this chapter, shall not be subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.204.170 (B) of this code. Residential and noncommercial uses may remain and function as noncommercial use(s) pursuant to the provisions of this section.

C. Existing nonconforming residential and noncommercial improvements, or portions of nonconforming residential and noncommercial improvements, destroyed or substantially damaged by natural catastrophe may be repaired, rebuilt, or enlarged pursuant to the following provisions:

1. Such work shall be permitted only on those improvements permitted and constructed in conformance with the building and zoning codes in effect at the time of original construction.

2. Approval of such work shall be obtained from the review body in accordance with Chapter 18.12 of this title development plan review board, which shall review the development plans and other pertinent information to einsure that all other applicable provisions of this chapter are satisfied and that no new nonconformity will be created.

3. The maximum lot coverage of rebuilt nonconforming residential structures shall not exceed thirty-five percent, except as provided herein.
a. If the lot coverage of the structure(s) is less than thirty-five percent, these structures may be enlarged by ten percent or to a total maximum lot coverage of thirty-five percent, whichever is less.
b. The increase in square footage/lot coverage shall be granted one time only. Once work has been completed on the number and type of structure(s) then permitted on the property in conformance with the provisions of this section, no further increase in habitable square footage/lot coverage shall be permitted.
c. If a nonconforming residential structure(s), which exceeds thirty-five percent lot coverage is destroyed or substantially damaged, the structure(s) may be rebuilt at the lot coverage existing at the time of destruction or substantial damage, provided that no structure(s) be rebuilt to a lot coverage greater than forty percent.

4. In any case, the maximum number of residential units which can be rebuilt in conformance with the provisions of this section shall not exceed two units per parcel.

D. For the purposes of this chapter, noncommercial structures only include existing churches, temples, educational institutions, fraternal organization facilities and/or public facilities. (Ord. 1007 § 1, 1993)

Ordinance 1320 Page 33
Approving MCTA 24-09

18.35.090 Provisions for existing commercial uses.

Any nonconforming commercial structures destroyed, substantially damaged, or demolished by natural catastrophe or intentional act must be reestablished as a residential use in conformance with the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 1007 § 1, 1993)

Ordinance 1320 Page 34
Approving MCTA 24-09
Exhibit D
Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09
*New text changes are in Blue and Underlined
*Deleted text is in Red and Strikethrough
Chapter 18.28 – SF-A SINGLE-FAMILY AGRICULTURE ZONE
Sections:

18.28.010 Purpose.

18.28.020 Uses permitted.

18.28.030 Uses permitted by conditional use permit.

18.28.035 Prohibited uses.

18.28.040 Keeping of horses.

18.28.050 Keeping of potbellied pigs as domestic pets.

18.28.060 Wildlife care and rehabilitation facilities.

18.28.010 Purpose.

The SF-A single-family agriculture zone is intended to provide for the development of singlefamily residential homes at urban standards, with not more than one dwelling unit permitted on any lot or parcel, and permitting certain domestic animals. (Ord. 37 § 3.02.00, 1961; Ord. 487 § 2, 1975; Ord. 1226 § 1, 2014)

18.28.020 Uses permitted.

Property in the SF-A zone may be used for:

A. Any use permitted in the S-F zone subject to all regulations applying to the S-F zone.

B. Wholesale nurseries, orchards, the raising of field crops. This subsection does not permit roadside stands, retail sale from the premises, or advertising signs of any nature.

C. Animal Keeping.

1. In addition to those animals permitted under Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, in the SF-A zone, on parcels of eleven thousand square feet or larger, containing not more than one dwelling unit, domestic animals shall be permitted within the following limitations, and solely for the use of the family residing on the parcel:
a. Rabbits, not to exceed one buck and four does;
b. Fowl (not including roosters) for meat purposes, not to exceed twenty-five;

Ordinance 1320 Page 35
Approving MCTA 24-09
c. Chickens for eggs (hens only), not to exceed twenty layers; d. Calves, not to exceed one calf under two years of age, and none older; e. Goats, not to exceed three;
f. Sheep, not to exceed three;
g. Horses, in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.28.040; h. Potbellied pigs, in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.28.050; i. Wildlife care and rehabilitation facilities in accordance with the provisions of Section

18.28.060.

2. All animals shall be properly housed at a distance of not less than thirty-five feet from any residence. If allowed outside their houses, animals shall be kept within adequate fences so that they do not have access to neighboring property.
(Ord. 37 § 3.02.01, 1961; Ord. 487 § 2, 1975; Ord. 558 § 1, 1976; Ord. 1074 § 1, 1997; Ord. 1226 § 1, 2014)

18.28.030 Uses permitted by conditional use permit.

The following uses may be permitted by conditional use permit:

A. Aviaries. This use shall be permitted on parcels of not less than one acre. Any structures used in connection with the use shall be located in accordance with the provisions of the County Health Code.

B. Churches and religious institutions.
(Ord. 37 § 3.02.02, 1961; Ord. 558 § 2, 1976; Ord. 1226 § 1, 2014)

18.28.035 Prohibited uses.

The following uses are prohibited in the single-family agriculture zone:

A. The keeping of roosters and peacocks for any use is prohibited in the city.

18.28.040 Keeping of horses.

In the SF-A zone, horses may be quartered and maintained subject to the following conditions:

A. The horses, including ponies, but excluding foals under twelve months, may be maintained under this section only for breeding purposes or for the personal use of the family residing on the lot or parcel.

1. A registered horse breeder may maintain an additional three horses for breeding purposes provided a permit for such purposes has been issued. A permit may be issued to the owner of a stallion for a period of one year, subject to the following conditions:
a. The breeder shall maintain the horses on a lot or parcel of one acre minimum, or greater, in

Ordinance 1320 Page 36
Approving MCTA 24-09
size;
b. Upon favorable recommendation of a committee appointed by the city council to review the application for permit.

B. Each lot or parcel shall be at least sixteen thousand square feet in size, and no more than two horses shall be kept on any such lot or parcel. One additional horse may be kept for each seven thousand five hundred square feet of land in excess of the original sixteen thousand, provided that the total number of horses maintained shall not exceed five, unless a conditional use permit is obtained. The conditional use permit may have attached to it such conditions that are deemed necessary in order to ensure that the maintenance of horses does not interfere with the reasonable use and enjoyment of the adjacent and surrounding properties. No fee shall be charged for the conditional use permit required in this subsection.

C. The Each horses shall be maintained in accordance with the following:

1. An open corrals containing at least two hundred eighty-eight square feet, e.g., twelve feet by twenty-four feet per horse in addition to an in enclosed box stalls or stable, which shall have a weatherproof roof, containing at least one hundred forty-four square feet, e.g., twelve feet by twelve feet per horse.

2. The corral must be no closer than No part of any corral, box stall, or stable shall be located:
a. Within thirty-five feet from any residence habitable structure located on the same lot or parcel,; and
b. Aat least eighty feet from any habitable structure residence located on an adjacent lot or parcel, and
c. At least one-hundred feet from any school building or hospital building.

3. Corrals, box stalls, and stables shall conform to building setbacks from any public or private streets.

D. 4. The corral areas shall consist of fences of at least five feet in height and of such construction so as to confine the horses.

5. The corral, box stall, and stable areas shall be sprinklered or otherwise treated to a degree so as to prevent the emanation of dust. In addition, all accumulation of manure, mud or refuse shall be eliminated so as to prevent the breeding of flies.

E. In conjunction with the corrals, there shall be weatherproof roofs of at least sixty-four square feet per horse.

DF. Nothing in this chapter shall permit the keeping of horses for any commercial purposes, such as boarding of horses or the keeping of horses not principally for the use of the members of the resident family of the subject property.

G. The corral and stable areas shall be sprinkled or otherwise treated to a degree so as to

Ordinance 1320 Page 37
Approving MCTA 24-09
prevent the emanation of dust. In addition, all accumulation of manure, mud or refuse shall be eliminated so as to prevent the breeding of flies.
(Ord. 1074 § 2, 1997; Ord. 1226 § 1, 2014)

18.28.050 Keeping of potbellied pigs as domestic pets.

This section shall authorize the keeping of the breed of swine commonly known as the Vietnamese potbellied pig or shari pig. Said animal shall only be allowed to be maintained as a domestic pet and shall only be authorized for property with a single-family agriculture (SF-A) zone designation. In addition, the following standards shall apply:

A. The single-family agriculture (SF-A) property shall have a minimum lot or parcel size of sixteen thousand square feet.

B. The potbellied pig animal shall not exceed a height of twenty-two inches and a weight not in excess of one hundred forty pounds.

C. Not more than two potbellied pig animals shall be allowed per residential lot or parcel.

D. The potbellied pig animal shall be licensed in the same manner as dogs are licensed pursuant to Section 6.08.010 of the San Dimas Municipal Code. Furthermore, the owner of the potbellied pig animal shall be subject to the same penalties for failure to obtain a license as a dog owner.

E. The owner or custodian of the potbellied pig animal shall only maintain said animal as a domestic pet and keep the premises where said animal resides in a clean, odor free and sanitary condition at all times.

F. The provisions of Chapter 6.24 which regulate noise from barking dogs shall apply to the sounds emanating from potbellied pigs.

G. It is unlawful and an infraction, subject to punishment in accordance to provisions of Chapter 1.12 of the San Dimas Municipal Code, for any owner or custodian of a potbellied pig animal to allow or permit such animal to be off the premises of the owner or custodian unless such animal is securely restrained by a leash of not more than six feet in length, and of sufficient strength to prevent the escape of said animal. Furthermore, the owner or custodian of said animal shall be a person capable of keeping the animal under effective charge and control.

H. Any potbellied pig animal which molests a passerby or passing vehicles, attacks other animals, trespasses on school grounds, is repeatedly at large, damages and/or trespasses on private or public property, grunts, whines, howls, honks, squeals, screeches, or otherwise makes or creates excessive, continuous or untimely noise, shall be considered and deemed a nuisance.
(Ord. 1074 § 3, 1997; Ord. 1226 § 1, 2014)

18.28.060 Wildlife care and rehabilitation facilities.

For the purposes of this section, wildlife care and rehabilitation facilities shall be defined as an activity undertaken, as an accessory use on residential property, to restore to a condition of good health, for the purposes of releasing into the wild, animals that naturally and typically

Ordinance 1320 Page 38
Approving MCTA 24-09
inhabit the area, but are not normally domesticated. Wildlife care and rehabilitation facilities may only be permitted as an accessory use on residential property zoned single-family agriculture (SF-A). In addition, the following standards shall apply:

A. The minimum lot or parcel size necessary to maintain the wildlife care and rehabilitation facility shall be not less than sixteen thousand square feet.

B. This section shall only authorize those facilities which are permitted by, and operated pursuant to, the provisions of the state of California Department of Fish and Game as a designated wildlife care and rehabilitation facility.

C. A wildlife care and rehabilitation facility shall be subject to review by, and shall receive the approval of, the director of Community Development pursuant to the provisions of Section

18.12.050(C) of the San Dimas Municipal Code.

D. The wildlife care and rehabilitation facility shall maintain a valid permit and approval as required by subsections B and C of this section at all times, or the approval shall become null and void.

E. The wildlife care and rehabilitation facility shall meet and maintain all conditions and standards set forth in Section 679, Title 14, California Code of Regulations. All activities involving wildlife care and rehabilitation shall be carried out in accordance with those regulations and permit conditions.

F. The owner/operator shall produce and shall maintain on the location any permit and/or certification issued by the state of California, Department of Fish and Game authorizing the operation of a wildlife care and rehabilitation facility. Such evidence must be produced when requested by the city staff, officers of the Pomona Valley Humane Society and/or any peace officer.

G. The owner/operator or custodian of a wildlife rehabilitation facility shall keep, or cause to be kept, the subject premises in a clean, odor free and sanitary condition at all times.

H. It is unlawful and an infraction, subject to punishment in accordance with Chapter 1.12 of the San Dimas Municipal Code for any owner/operator or custodian of any wildlife care and rehabilitation facility to allow or permit any animal to be off the premises. This provision does not apply to the transfer of an animal to and/or by a bona fide institution authorized in writing by the local warden of the California Department of Fish and Game. (Ord. 1074 § 4, 1997; Ord. 1226 § 1, 2014)

ATTACHMENT 2

52 Town Core Residential
The many small residential streets
bounded by Arrow Highway on
the south, Gladstone Street on the
north, Walnut Avenue on the east, and
the 210 freeway on the west form the
majority of the historic building stock
of San Dimas. This underlying
structure (morphology) of the town
core was laid down in 1887 with the
coming of the Santa Fe Railway.

Development in these areas began late
in the 19th century and continued until
the Second World War.

Most blocks within the Town Core
are 600 feet long in the east-west
direction and 300 feet long in the
north-south direction. These blocks
are bisected in the east-west direction
by a service lane or a1Iey. Lot sizes are
typically 50 feet wide and 140 feet
deep. Nearly all lots front an east-west
street and are accessible from the rear
via the alleys. To facilitate surface
drainage, the east-west streets are
severely cambered. Landscaped
parkways line the sidewalks of most
streets. The traditional development of
the 50-foot-wide lot is to build to the
20-foot front-yard setback and to the
five feet side-yard setbacks. Vehicular
access is taken from the back alley;
with such narrow lots, vehicular access
from the street is undesirable because
the resultant streetscape is of garage
doors and paving with very little
landscaping. The severe road camber
makes curb cuts for vehicular access
technically difficult. Where curb cuts
and garages have been allowed in
recent years, the results are visually
unsatisfactory.

Currently, the alleys throughout the
Town Core are not well maintained or
visually pleasing. Various planning
requirements help to control
development along the street fronts and
the results are homogeneous and
successful. The requirements along the
lanes are not as clear, and the results are
less desirable. An organized strategy of
public and private improvements for the
alleys will result in a greater willingness
on the part of residents to use them for
access to parking.

Parkways along most streets present
difficult maintenance problems both for
residents and the city. These parkways
and their landscapes are significant
contributors to the streetscape and
should be maintained. The city could
initiate an incentive program to
encourage residents to maintain the
parkways in front of their houses.
50 FOOT WIDE LOT _ __,
. )

FRONT SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACK
TYPICAL BLOCK IN TONN CORE RESIDEN11AL AREA
ATTACHMENT 3 Page
Town Core Residential

KEY ISSUES
• Maintenance and enhancement of
qualities inherent in the original
planning of this district.
• Protection of existing historic buildings.
• Enhancement of the streetscape with
public improvement projects.
• Protection of existing mature landscape.
• Consider providing park or
recreational facilities within the
district east of San Dimas Avenue
and north of Bonita Avenue.

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
• Large mature trees should be protected.
• North-south streets should meet
similar planning standards as eastwest streets ( e.g. setback landscaping, sidewalks, etc.).
• A consistent setback policy should be
established for the alleys.
• Develop an incentive program for
alley cleanup by residents.
• Parkways should be retained between
sidewalks and streets.

PARKWAY

RECOMMENDED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
• Parkways that have been replaced
with concrete should be returned to
landscape.
• A street lighting program should be
introduced.
• Overhead power and telephone lines
along streets should be placed
underground or along the alleys.
• Pave alleys and add street lights with
low level lighting (max. 12 feet high),
so that they are an attractive
alternative to on-street parking.

RECOMMENDED PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS
• Limit building height to 30 feet for
residential buildings.
• Existing setback requirements should
be maintained. Front setbacks
should not be less than those for
adjoining properties.
• Landscaped front yards should be
maintained and never paved for
parking or vehicular access.
• Fences should be made of wood.
• Additions to historic buildings should
harmonize with the architecture of the
building. (Note: For specific guidelines
for additions to existing buildings, see
page 77)
• New building slabs should be 2 feet above
the existing grade of front yard to relate
to the historic building morphology.
• Roof pitches for all structures should
not be less than 3 in 12.
• Parking should be entered only off
back alleys, and parking should be
provided in garages.
• Walls, fences or doors along lanes
should be included in plan, for new
construction or rehabilitation.

DISCOURAGED PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS
• Infilling or transforming existing front
porches should be discouraged.
• Additional curb cuts.
• Multi-family apartment buildings and
buildings out of character with the area.
• Garages and parking entered from
streets should be discouraged.

LANE/ ALLEY BACK YARD PARKWAY

GARAGE FRONT YARD

TYPICAL SECTION THROUGH TOWN CORE RESIDENTIAL AREA
53 Page
Study Session Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of July 22, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Anne Moore, Senior Planner
Subject: Discussion and Consideration of a Municipal Code Text Amendment to Amend Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code to Clarify the Intent of Certain Sections, Add Language to Sections where Policies have been in Place, but Never Codified, and Various Clean Up Items as Required
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
For the past several years, staff has been auditing the San Dimas Municipal Code (SDMC) to identify ways to make the Code more functional, as well as more user-friendly for residents, contractors, and staff to understand and navigate. To this end, Staff identified several Chapters of the SDMC Title 18-Zoning that should be amended, updated, deleted and/or modified.

On April 27, 2021, the City Council approved the initiation of a Municipal Code Text Amendment (MCTA) to amend the Chapters identified by staff. The MCTA was broken up into three (3) separate MCTA actions. MCTA Action No. 1 consists of amending Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SFDR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code. MCTA Action No. 2 consists of amending SDMC Section 17.12 Preliminary and Tentative Maps – Filing Procedures, Chapter 18.12 Development Plan Review Board, Chapter 18.196 Temporary Uses, Chapter 18.200 Conditional Use Permits, Chapter 18.204 Variances, Chapter 18.208 Zone Changes and Amendments, and Chapter 18.212 Appeal Procedures. MCTA Action No. 3 consists of amending Chapter 18.08 Definitions and Chapter 18.188 Explosives. In addition, the initiation included the amendment of other applicable chapters as required.

MCTA Action No. 2 and No. 3 will be presented to both the Planning Commission and the City Council at a later date. As part of MCTA 24-09, Staff has included Chapter 18.28 Single-Family Agriculture (SF-A) Zone in order to provide clarification on permitted animals and the requirement for horse stables.

ATTACHMENT 4

Discussion and Consideration of a MCTA 24-09 Page 2
For the Meeting of July 22, 2025
MCTA 24-09 is intended to clarify the intent of the above-mentioned sections, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and various clean up items as required.

On November 21, 2024, the Planning Commission heard MCTA 24-09 and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of MCTA 24-09 to the City Council.

At the January 14, 2025, regular City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to bring back MCTA 24-09 to a study session in order to further discuss the proposed changes.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council provide input on the proposed amendment and provide direction on moving it forward to a public hearing before the City Council.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
San Dimas was incorporated as a city on August 4, 1960. Prior to the City’s incorporation, residential development was regulated by the Los Angeles County Zoning Code. On June 22, 1961, the City established its first Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 37), which provided development standards for residentially zoned properties including residential agriculture lots within the City, now identified as Single-Family Agriculture (SF-A). The Single-Family Downtown Residential (SF-DR) Zone was not established until 1993 through Ordinance 1007, which was created as a result of the City pursuing a zone change for the downtown residential area, commonly known as the “Towncore.”
Since the establishment of the City’s zoning code, there have been a number of updates that have been made to Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone that were done either due to land use determinations or to provide clarity on specific residential development standards. All of the abovementioned sections of Title-18 Zoning were last amended in 2014 through Ordinance No. 1226 to allow the keeping of certain types of fowl in a limited number as household pets.

Within the past decade, there have been a number of code compliance cases that have risen due to sections of the San Dimas Municipal Code (Code) that may be unclear, unaddressed, or misinterpreted. As a result, various sections of the Code are in need of being cleaned up and updated. In addition, there are numerous City Council adopted policies that have been in place that have not been codified, which staff is including as part of this amendment. By codifying many of these policies that affect residentially zoned properties, the Code would be more functional, as well as more user-friendly for residents, contractors, and staff to understand and navigate.

Discussion and Consideration of a MCTA 24-09 Page 3
For the Meeting of July 22, 2025
On April 27, 2021, the City Council initiated a Municipal Code Text Amendment, which identified several Chapters of the SDMC Title 18-Zoning that should be amended, updated, deleted and/or modified. The MCTA initiation is broken up into three separate MCTA actions. MCTA Action No. 1 consists of amending Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F SingleFamily Residential Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code. MCTA Action No. 2 consists of amending SDMC Section 17.12 Preliminary and Tentative Maps – Filing Procedures, Chapter 18.12 Development Plan Review Board, Chapter 18.196 Temporary Uses, Chapter 18.200 Conditional Use Permits, Chapter

18.204 Variances, Chapter 18.208 Zone Changes and Amendments, and Chapter 18.212 Appeal Procedures. MCTA Action No. 3 consists of amending Chapter 18.08 Definitions and Chapter

18.188 Explosives. In addition, the initiation included the amendment of other applicable chapters as required.

MCTA 24-09 was considered by the Planning Commission at their November 21, 2024, meeting.

Staff shared with the Commission that the bulk of the changes to the SF, SF- DR, SF-A, and Residential Zones Generally sections of the Municipal Code are to codify already existing policies and address clean up items in the Code. Staff also clarified that the short-term rental prohibition, the five-foot rear yard setback and the required distance from horse corrals to schools and hospital buildings are new items. During the discussion, the Commission inquired about whether having policies would be easier to change than a Municipal Code. Staff informed the Commission that although it is easier to change a policy, staff has been directed within the past few years to not create policies, but to codify items into the Code as it makes it clear to the public what the regulations are of the City and allows for enforcement of the regulations. After further discussion, the Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval to the City Council of MCTA 24-09.

At the January 14, 2025, regular City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to bring back the MCTA 24-09, to a study session in order to further discuss the proposed changes (Attachment 1 and 3).

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The Residential Zones Generally (Chapter 18.20) section of the Code was created with the intent of providing regulations for certain uses across all residentially zoned properties within the City.

However, the existing Residential Zones Generally section of the Code has historically been used very sparingly due to the limited uses and standards that it refers to. Following a comprehensive review of the development standards within the Code that pertain to residential properties, staff observed that there are numerous sections that are applicable for all residential properties.

Therefore, staff determined that it would be best to separate and consolidate these development standards collectively into Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally. In addition, incorporating a number of City Council adopted policies into this Residential Zones Generally section will assist staff in addressing common code compliance concerns more efficiently and consistently across all residentially zoned properties.

Staff has comprised all the proposed amendments into four categories listed below, that identify the code section that is being discussed and the reason for the amendment:

Table1: Adopted Policies to be Codified
Table 2: Code Language relocated to 18.20 Residential Zones Generally Table 3: Code Language to be Revised/Cleaned Up
Table 4: New Code Language

Discussion and Consideration of a MCTA 24-09 Page 4
For the Meeting of July 22, 2025
It is worth noting that since these City Council adopted policies are not available in the Code, applicants and homeowners are not aware of these standards, which can create confusion when corrections, based on the policies, are provided by Staff. Therefore, this amendment includes the policies identified in Table 1 below. Table 1 also provides the date the policy was adopted by City Council. Each of these policies with the exception of Item #1, will all be added to Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally and a column is included in Table 1 identifying the new corresponding zoning section. Many of the policies have been slightly modified/updated in order to better address issues that have risen since the policy was originally adopted, but the intent of the adopted policy has not been changed. A brief explanation of the modifications to a number of the policies is included in a “Notes” column. All of the policies identified in Table 1 are included in Attachment 2.

Table 1: Adopted Polices to be Codified
Policy
CC
Adoption
Date
Notes SDMC

1. Flag poles and flags 8/24/2006 Modified to comply with the Second Amendment and remove restriction
on flag content, increase quantity of
flags to two, and remove hours of
display.

18.20.110

2. Fencing and decking
encroachment into
the slope area
5/12/2007 Will provide clarity to residents in
residential hillside areas.

18.20.90.A.6

3. Exterior fireplaces 2/29/2008 Modified to reduce height from 10 feet to 8 feet and remove distance
requirement between structures.

18.20.100

4. Fences and walls 12/1/2008 Modified to include standards for vacant & corner lots and include
specific allowed materials.

18.20.090

5. Undergrounding of
utilities
5/4/2009 Restrictions on height of electric
service masts added.

18.20.210

6. Canopy and other
membrane
structures
5/12/2009 Modified to include vehicle covers,
specific allowed materials, and
definitive duration of 6 months.

18.20.080

7. Mechanical
equipment and
screening
7/22/2010 Modified criteria for outdoor water
heaters and portable window air
conditioners/heating units.

18.20.150

8. Pool, spa and
rockscape setbacks
4/25/2011 Include setbacks for pool equipment
and allow rockscapes greater than 6
feet in height at a min. distance of 10
feet from side/rear property lines.

18.20.200

9. Curb cuts and
driveway access
from the street in the
Town Core area
10/23/2001 Modified to include review by
Director of Community Development
for modification/relocation of existing
curb cuts.

18.35.050.C.

Discussion and Consideration of a MCTA 24-09 Page 5
For the Meeting of July 22, 2025
As mentioned earlier in the report, staff observed that there are numerous sections that are applicable for all residential properties that should be consolidated into Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally. These sections that can be applied across all residentially zoned properties have been relocated into Chapter 18.20 and are listed in Table 2. Many of the sections listed in Table 2 pertain to already existing sections of the Code but were modified to read more clearly in the code. The original zoning section is identified in the “SDMC (original)” column and the new zoning section where it is being placed into Chapter 18.20 is identified in the “SDMC (new)” column. An added “Notes” column is included with a brief explanation as to why the specific code section is being revised.

In addition to the City Council adopted policies identified in Table 1 that will be codified, and the relocation of various zoning sections to be consolidated into Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally identified in Table 2, the amendment will also include numerous clean-up items listed in Table 3. Many of the clean-up items listed in Table 3 pertain to already existing sections of the Code and the applicable zoning section is identified in the “SDMC” column. An added “Notes” column is included with a brief explanation as to why the specific code section is being revised.

Table 2: Code Language relocated to 18.20 Residential Zones Generally Code
Revision/Update Notes SDMC (original)
SDMC
(new)

1. Refuse storage
location
Provides clear standards for refuse
storage location and screening from
public right-of-way due to high number
of complaints received by Code
Compliance.

18.35.050.E 18.20.170

2. Residential lighting Directs residential lighting to be downward to protect adjoining
properties.

18.24.050.H 18.20.140

3. Clarify landscaping
requirements
Ensures residents understand that
parkway landscaping falls under their
responsibility and that all front yard
and street side yards are properly
maintained.

18.35.050.G 18.20.130
Table 3: Code Language to be Revised/Up Cleaned Up
Code Revision/Update Notes SDMC

1. Clarify the term “fowl” Provides clarity to residents that fowls are permitted except for roosters.

18.28.020.C.b

2. Add prohibition of roosters
and peacocks in SingleFamily Agriculture (SF-A)
Zone
This is done to be consistent with the
Residential Zones Generally section.

18.28.035.A

3. Requirements for open
corrals/enclosed box stalls
Provides more detailed size/design
parameters and distance from
“habitable structure”.

18.28.040.C.

Discussion and Consideration of a MCTA 24-09 Page 6
For the Meeting of July 22, 2025

4. Physical encroachments
into required side yard
setbacks
Provides flexibility for residents for
locating mechanical equipment and
portable sheds within the required 12-
foot side yard setback.

18.24.040.E.2

5. Describe lots that have
alley access
Assists residents/code compliance on
applicability of zoning standards for
properties with alley access.

18.24.040.E.3.ii

6. Further define lot
coverage calculation
Assists residents/applicants on what
structures to include in order to properly
calculate lot coverage.

18.24.040.F.2

7. Remove carport as a
permitted use
The Parking section of the Code
requires a two-car garage for a singlefamily home; however the Single-Family zone section of the code allows a
carport in addition to a garage. This has
created at time confusion with residents
on what is allowed vs. what is required,
and to avoid further confusion and the
construction of a low-grade garage,
which aesthetically tend to be harder to
integrate into the existing house, staff
and the Planning Commission
recommend the deletion of future
carports.

18.24.020.B.2.c.i

8. Clarify flag lots in S-F
Zone
Restrict the pole portion of flag lots to be
used for access only and excluded from
calculating minimum required parcel
size and provide an example diagram of
a flag lot for residents to better
understand.

18.24.040.C

9. Clarify flag lots in SF-DR
Zone
Restrict the pole portion of flag lots to be
used for access only and provide an
example diagram of a flag lot for
residents to better understand.

18.35.040.B.b

10. Reduce quantity of homing
pigeons from 100 to 25
and remove permit
requirements
Removes unnecessary permit
application and renewal process.

18.20.060.D.2.f

11. Remove modification of
development standards
code section in SF Zone
Modifications of development standards
are typically processed through the
City’s Variance process; therefore,
removing it avoids confusion and makes
it consistent with the Code.

18.24.060

12. Remove development
restriction on lots less than
6,000 sq.ft. in size
There are a number of lots in the SF-DR
that are undersized and prohibiting
development would be considered a
taking.

18.35.050.A.3

Discussion and Consideration of a MCTA 24-09 Page 7
For the Meeting of July 22, 2025
Lastly, there are several new items that Staff is introducing as part of MCTA 24-09, which are identified in Table 4. Table 4 also includes the section where the new code language will be located under the “SDMC” column. Items listed #4-7 in Table 4 are considered new items primarily because they were not clearly described in the code, but were determinations made by the Director over time through various code compliance cases. Therefore, staff is incorporating these items into the code language to better assist residents in the future.

13. Remove requirement of lot
merger for remnant
railroad parcels
Removal of this is warranted to allow
property owners abutting remnant
railroad parcels to do improvements to
their home.

18.35.050.A.4

14. Include minimum lot sizes
in Single-Family
Downtown Residential
(SF-DR) Zone
Included to be consistent with SingleFamily (SF) Zone. 18.35.040.B.1

15. Increase minimum depth
required in Single-Family
Downtown Residential
(SF-DR) Zone
Increased to 140 feet due to many
standard lots in the SF-DR Zone already
having this depth.

18.35.040.B.2

16. Reduce storage of
materials on a property
after construction from 60
days to 15 days
Requires residents to remove excess
construction debris/materials in a timely
manner.

18.20.040

17. Remove section in SF-DR
for nonconforming
residence that is
destroyed or substantially
damaged, and rebuilt.

Separate section addressing
nonconforming structures already exists
in SDMC Section 18.204.170
Nonconforming Uses.

18.35.080.C.3.c
& 18.35.080.C.4

18. Allow existing legal
structures located on legal
lots between 5,000 to
7,000 square feet to be
modified, altered, or added
onto.

Allows residents of undersized lots to
still make improvements to their
residence so long as building code
requirements are met.

18.35.040.A.2

19. Remove public or private
utility service facility as a
conditionally permitted use
This type of use includes vehicle,
equipment and material parking/storage
and related activities, which is typically
discouraged in residential zones

18.35.030.G

20. Remove detached
garages and accessory
buildings built at zero lot
line.

Buildings and structures built at zero lot
in single-family residentially zoned
properties create maintenance and fire
safety concerns.

18.35.040.D.2.a

21. Remove “Incentives”
section under “Design
Guidelines” for SF-DR
Removing this section does not take
away from applying Towncore Design
Guidelines.

18.35.070.C

Discussion and Consideration of a MCTA 24-09 Page 8
For the Meeting of July 22, 2025

Discussion and Consideration of a MCTA 24-09 Page 8
For the Meeting of July 22, 2025
The changes described above in Tables 1-3 are not intended to change the overall purpose of the single-family standards but are meant to update the Code so it is more functional, provides clarification, and will make it more user- friendly for residents, contractors, and Staff to understand and navigate.

ALTERNATIVES
There are currently no alternatives proposed for this request; however, the City Council may recommend changes to the proposed MCTA language.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Table 4: New Code Language
New Code Language Notes SDMC

1. Include horse corral
distance requirements from
hospitals/schools
The 100-foot distance requirement from
hospitals/schools is standard in LA
County and throughout the state.

18.28.040.C

2. Introduce rear yard setback
for SF Zone and modify rear
yard setback for SF-DR
Ensures structures that require a building
permit to be located a minimum of 10 feet
from the rear property line or 5 feet for
non-habitable accessory structures. This
allows for privacy and open yard space.

18.24.050.E.3
&

18.35.040.D.

4. 3. Prohibit short-term rentals City has received many complaints and this prohibition will assist Code
Compliance on enforcement.

18.20.020.B.

4. Accessory structures further
defined
Provides clarification for residents/code
compliance on permitted accessory
structures and setback requirements.

18.20.070

5. Storage sheds defined Allows residents to have portable storage sheds up to a certain quantity, provides
minimum setback/distance requirements
from sheds to other structures on
residential property, and exempts the first
three sheds from lot coverage
requirements.

18.20.190

6. Clarify allowance
parameters of outdoor
storage and storage
containers
Restricts timeframe for outdoor storage
containers and includes information on
encroachment permit if located on the
public right-of-way.

18.20.160

7. Maintenance of sloped
areas
Makes it clear to residents that sloped
areas within their property need to be
properly maintained and remain
unaltered unless approved by the City.

18.20.180

Discussion and Consideration of a MCTA 24-09 Page 9
For the Meeting of July 22, 2025
Respectfully submitted,
Anne Moore
Senior Planner
Attachments:

1. Draft Ordinance 1320

2. City Council Adopted Policies to be Codified

3. January 14, 2025, City Council Staff Report & Action Summary

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of January 14, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Anne Moore, Senior Planner
Subject: Discussion and Consideration of a Municipal Code Text Amendment to Amend Title 18-zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code to Clarify the Intent of Certain Sections, Add Language to Sections where Policies Have Been in Place, but Never Codified, and Various Clean Up Items as Required
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
For the past several years, staff has been auditing the San Dimas Municipal Code (SDMC) to identify ways to make the Code more functional, as well as more user-friendly for residents, contractors, and staff to understand and navigate. To this end, Staff identified several Chapters of the SDMC Title 18-Zoning that should be amended, updated, deleted and/or modified, and presented the Municipal Code Text Amendment (MCTA) to the City Council for initiation on April 27, 2021.

The City Council granted the MCTA initiation, which is broken up into three separate MCTA actions. MCTA Action No. 1 consists of amending Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code. MCTA Action No. 2 consists of amending SDMC Section 17.12 Preliminary and Tentative Maps – Filing Procedures, Chapter 18.12 Development Plan Review Board, Chapter 18.196 Temporary Uses, Chapter

18.200 Conditional Use Permits, Chapter 18.204 Variances, Chapter 18.208 Zone Changes and Amendments, and Chapter 18.212 Appeal Procedures. MCTA Action No. 3 consists of amending Chapter 18.08 Definitions and Chapter 18.188 Explosives. In addition, the initiation included the amendment of other applicable chapters as required.

MCTA Action No. 2 and No. 3 will be presented to both the Planning Commission and the City Council at a later date. As part of MCTA 24-09, Staff has included Chapter 18.28 Single-Family Agriculture Zone in order to provide clarification on permitted animals and the requirement for horse stables.

ATTACHMENT 5

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 2
For the Meeting of January 14, 2025
Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 is intended to clarify the intent of the above-mentioned sections, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and various clean up items as required.

On November 21, 2024, the Planning Commission considered the proposed ordinance and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 to the City Council.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council:
• Conduct a Public Hearing.
• Introduce Ordinance 1320, Approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09, a request to amend Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 SF Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code to clarify the intent of certain sections, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and various clean up items as required.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
San Dimas was incorporated as a city on August 4, 1960. Prior to the City’s incorporation, residential development was regulated by the Los Angeles County Zoning Code. On June 22, 1961, the City established its first Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 37), which provided development standards for residentially zoned properties including residential agriculture lots within the City, now identified as Single-Family Agriculture (SF-A). The Single-Family Downtown Residential (SF-DR) Zone was not established until 1993 through Ordinance 1007, which was created as a result of the City pursuing a zone change for the downtown residential area, commonly known as the “Towncore.”
Since the establishment of the City’s zoning code, there have been a number of updates that have been made to Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone that were done either due to land use determinations or to provide clarity on specific residential development standards. All of the abovementioned sections of Title-18 Zoning were last amended in 2014 through Ordinance No. 1226 to allow the keeping of certain types of fowl in a limited number as household pets.

Within the past decade, there have been a number of code compliance cases that have risen due to sections of the San Dimas Municipal Code (Code) that may be unclear, unaddressed, or misinterpreted. As a result, various sections of the Code are in need of being cleaned up and updated. In addition, there are numerous City Council adopted policies that have been in place that have not been codified, which staff is including as part of this amendment. By codifying many

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 3
For the Meeting of January 14, 2025
of these policies that affect residentially zoned properties, the Code would be more functional, as well as more user-friendly for residents, contractors, and staff to understand and navigate.

On April 27, 2021, the City Council initiated a Municipal Code Text Amendment, which identified several Chapters of the SDMC Title 18-Zoning that should be amended, updated, deleted and/or modified (See Attachment 3). The MCTA initiation is broken up into three separate MCTA actions.

MCTA Action No. 1 consists of amending Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter

18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code. MCTA Action No. 2 consists of amending SDMC Section 17.12 Preliminary and Tentative Maps – Filing Procedures, Chapter 18.12 Development Plan Review Board, Chapter 18.196 Temporary Uses, Chapter 18.200 Conditional Use Permits, Chapter 18.204 Variances, Chapter 18.208 Zone Changes and Amendments, and Chapter 18.212 Appeal Procedures. MCTA Action No. 3 consists of amending Chapter

18.08 Definitions and Chapter 18.188 Explosives. In addition, the initiation included the amendment of other applicable chapters as required.

MCTA 24-09 was considered by the Planning Commission at their November 21, 2024, meeting (See Attachment 2). Staff stated to the Commission that the bulk of the changes to the SF, SFDR, SF-A, and Residential Zones Generally sections of the Municipal Code are to codify already existing policies and address clean up items in the Code. Staff also clarified that the short-term rental prohibition, the five-foot rear yard setback and the required distance from horse corrals to school and hospital buildings are new items. During the discussion, the Commission inquired about whether having policies would be easier to change than a Municipal Code. Staff informed the Commission that although it is easier to change a policy, staff has been directed within the past few years to not create policies, but to codify items into the Code as it makes it clear to the public what the regulations are of the City and allows for enforcement of the regulations. After further discussion, the Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval to the City Council of MCTA 24-09.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The Residential Zones Generally (Chapter 18.20) section of the Code was created with the intent of providing regulations for certain uses across all residentially zoned properties within the City.

However, the existing Residential Zones Generally section of the Code has historically been used very sparingly due to the limited uses and standards that it refers to. Following a comprehensive review of the development standards within the Code that pertain to residential properties, staff observed that there are numerous sections that are applicable for all residential properties.

Therefore, staff determined that it would be best to separate and consolidate these development standards collectively into Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally. In addition, incorporating a number of City Council adopted policies into this Residential Zones Generally section will assist staff in addressing common code compliance concerns more efficiently and consistently across all residentially zoned properties.

While the goal of this amendment is to codify already existing policies specific to residentially zoned properties and to ensure the Residential Zones Generally section of the Code functions as it is originally intended, staff is also incorporating a number of “clean-up” items. Among these “clean-up” items include the introduction of a rear yard setback in the SF and SF-DR zones, which did not previously exist. The addition of a 10-foot rear yard setback for habitable structures, and five (5) foot for accessory structures within the SF and SF-DR zones not only protects usable open space within the rear yard area, but it also ensures some level of privacy between adjacent properties. In addition, the new five-foot rear yard setback is in line with separation requirements

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 4
For the Meeting of January 14, 2025
for building to property lines required by the Fire Code. There are also properties within the SF and SF-DR zone that have alley access, which is not currently addressed in the Code. Therefore, staff has included added language differentiating “regular lots” and “alley loaded lots” to appropriately apply the new rear yard setback, as alley loaded lots will be subject to three (3) or 20 feet rear yard setback for garages, and five (5) feet for all other structures. MCTA 24-09 also provides clarification on what is included as part of calculating lot coverage for a property. Lastly, this amendment will also incorporate the prohibition of short-term rentals within the City, which will be included within Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally. Short-term rentals are already prohibited for Accessory and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units; therefore, this amendment will align with a current standard in the Code and provide some consistency. It will also address complaints received by Staff related to short-term rentals.

Another “clean-up” item that is being introduced into the SF and SF-DR zone is regarding the location of mechanical equipment, which is commonly brought up by residents. The side yard setback as it currently exists in the SF zone requires a minimum twelve-foot side yard on the side of the lot closest to the driveway while the other side yard shall be a minimum of five feet. The current SF zone also specifies that the twelve-foot side yard shall be maintained exclusive of any structural or other physical encroachments. The intent of the twelve-foot side yard setback is to allow for recreational vehicle storage behind the front main building line; however, not all SF zoned properties can accommodate a recreational vehicle and to some residents, maintaining the twelve-foot side yard exclusive of any structural or other physical encroachments limits the available locations for any proposed mechanical equipment. Therefore, staff has included a provision in the Code that allows for mechanical equipment such as air conditioning units, water softeners, solar panel equipment boxes, pool equipment, and/or generators, to be located within the required twelve-foot side yard (or ten-foot side yard setback for the SF-DR zone) subject to the following: a minimum of five (5) feet is maintained from the side property line, the equipment is screened from public view to the extent physically possible, and located behind the front main building line, or an existing gate and/or wall. It should be noted that although there is added language in the Code to allow for mechanical equipment to be located within the required 12-foot side yard setback, this allowance does not exempt an SF Zoned property or other applicable residentially zoned properties from meeting the parking requirements if the property owner desires to park a recreational vehicle on the property. In other words, if mechanical equipment is located within the 12-foot side yard setback, a resident may not request a deviation from the parking requirements to accommodate their recreational vehicle, as these types of allowed mechanical equipment could be easily relocated to other areas of the property.

In 2014, the City amended Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally to allow the keeping of certain types of fowl in a limited number as household pets, but also added the prohibition of roosters in all zones through Ordinance No. 1226. However, in that same ordinance, language was also added to Chapter 18.28 Single-Family Agriculture (SF-A) stating that chickens are permitted “in addition to those animals permitted under Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally.” Staff, at that time, did not realize the new language in Chapter 18.28 could be interpreted to override the prohibition on roosters in Chapter 18.20. Therefore, as part of MCTA 24-09, staff is including an amendment to Chapter 18.28 to specify that “chickens for eggs (hens only)” and “fowl (not including roosters) for meat purposes” would be permitted in addition to adding the prohibition of roosters and peacocks. Additional clean-up items for the SF-A Zone including clarifying the requirements for the open corral and enclosed box stall for each horse as well as adding a minimum distance from any school building or hospital building.

In addition to the clean-up items listed above, the amendment will also be codifying numerous City Council adopted policies that have been in place that have not been incorporated into the

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 5
For the Meeting of January 14, 2025
Code. Since these policies are not available in the Code, applicants are not aware of these standards which can create confusion when corrections, based on the policies, are provided by Staff. Therefore, this amendment includes, but not limited to curb cuts and driveway access from the street in the Town Core area, fencing and decking encroachment into the slope area, mechanical equipment and screening, exterior fireplaces, fences and walls, flag poles and flags, canopy and other membrane structures, pool, spa and rockscape setbacks, and undergrounding of utilities.

The clean-up items and policies mentioned above are just some of the changes that are included with this amendment. There are several other changes, related to accessory and membrane structures, fences and walls, equipment screening, storage sheds, and utilities which are included in each of the ordinances included as exhibits to Resolution PC-1688 (See Attachment 1). These changes are not intended to change the overall purpose of the single-family standards but meant to update the Code so it is more functional, provides clarification, and will make it more userfriendly for residents, contractors, and Staff to understand and navigate.

ALTERNATIVES
There are currently no alternatives proposed for this request; however, the City Council may recommend changes to the proposed MCTA language.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Anne Moore
Senior Planner
Attachments:

1. Ordinance 1320

2. November 21, 2024, Planning Commission Staff Report, Draft Minutes, & Resolution PC1688

3. April 27, 2021, City Council Staff Report & Action Summary

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Chairman and Members of Planning Commission For the Meeting of November 21, 2024
From: Luis Torrico, Director of Community Development
Prepared by: Anne Moore, Senior Planner
Subject: Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09; Discussion and Consideration of a Municipal Code Text Amendment to amend Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code to clarify the intent of certain sections, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and various clean up items as required.
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
For the past several years, staff has been auditing the San Dimas Municipal Code (SDMC) to identify ways to make the Code more functional, as well as more user-friendly for residents, contractors, and staff to understand and navigate. To this end, Staff identified several Chapters of the SDMC Title 18-Zoning that should be amended, updated, deleted and/or modified, and presented the Municipal Code Text Amendment (MCTA) to the City Council for initiation on April 27, 2021.

The City Council granted the MCTA initiation, which is broken up into three separate MCTA actions. MCTA Action No. 1 consists of amending Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code. MCTA Action No. 2 consists of amending SDMC Section 17.12 Preliminary and Tentative Maps – Filing Procedures, Chapter

18.12 Development Plan Review Board, Chapter 18.196 Temporary Uses, Chapter 18.200 Conditional Use Permits, Chapter 18.204 Variances, Chapter 18.208 Zone Changes and Amendments, and Chapter 18.212 Appeal Procedures. MCTA Action No. 3 consists of amending Chapter 18.08 Definitions and Chapter 18.188 Explosives. In addition, the initiation included the amendment of other applicable chapters as required.

MCTA Action No. 2 and No. 3 will be presented to Planning Commission at a later date. As part of MCTA 24-09, Staff has included Chapter 18.28 Single-Family Agriculture Zone in order to provide clarification on permitted animals and the requirement for horse stables.

ATTACHMENT 6

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 2
For the Meeting of November 21, 2024
Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 is intended to clarify the intent of the abovementioned sections, add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified, and amend procedural processes to be in line with current and proposed processes.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PC-1688, recommending approval to the City Council of MCTA 24-09.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
San Dimas was incorporated as a city on August 4, 1960. Prior to the City’s incorporation, residential development was regulated by the Los Angeles County Zoning Code. On June 22, 1961, the City established its first Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 37), which provided development standards for residentially zoned properties including residential agriculture lots within the City, now identified as Single-Family Agriculture (SF-A). The Single-Family Downtown Residential (SF-DR) Zone was not established until 1993 through Ordinance 1007, which was created as a result of the City pursuing a zone change for the downtown residential area, commonly known as the “Towncore.”
Since the establishment of the City’s zoning code, there have been a number of updates that have been made to Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter 18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, Chapter 18.28 SF-A Single-Family Agriculture Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone that were done either due to land use determinations or to provide clarity on specific residential development standards. All of the abovementioned sections of Title-18 Zoning were last amended in 2014 through Ordinance No. 1226 to allow the keeping of certain types of fowl in a limited number as household pets.

Within the past decade, there have been a number of code compliance cases that have risen due to sections of the San Dimas Municipal Code (Code) that may be unclear, unaddressed, or misinterpreted. As a result, various sections of the Code are in need of being cleaned up and updated. In addition, there are numerous City Council adopted policies that have been in place that have not been codified, which staff is including as part of this amendment. By codifying many of these policies that affect residentially zoned properties, the Code would be more functional, as well as more user-friendly for residents, contractors, and staff to understand and navigate.

On April 27, 2021, the City Council initiated a Municipal Code Text Amendment, which identified several Chapters of the SDMC Title 18-Zoning that should be amended, updated, deleted and/or modified (Attachment 2). The MCTA initiation is broken up into three separate MCTA actions.

MCTA Action No. 1 consists of amending Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally, Chapter

18.24 S-F Single-Family Residential Zone, and Chapter 18.35 SF-DR Single-Family Downtown Residential Zone of the San Dimas Municipal Code. MCTA Action No. 2 consists of amending SDMC Section 17.12 Preliminary and Tentative Maps – Filing Procedures, Chapter 18.12 Development Plan Review Board, Chapter 18.196 Temporary Uses, Chapter 18.200 Conditional Use Permits, Chapter 18.204 Variances, Chapter 18.208 Zone Changes and Amendments, and Chapter 18.212 Appeal Procedures. MCTA Action No. 3 consists of amending Chapter 18.08

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 3
For the Meeting of November 21, 2024
Definitions and Chapter 18.188 Explosives. In addition, the initiation included the amendment of other applicable chapters as required.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The Residential Zones Generally (Chapter 18.20) section of the Code was created with the intent of providing regulations for certain uses across all residentially zoned properties within the City.

However, the existing Residential Zones Generally section of the Code has historically been used very sparingly due to the limited uses and standards that it refers to. Following a comprehensive review of the development standards within the Code that pertain to residential properties, staff observed that there are numerous sections that are applicable for all residential properties.

Therefore, staff determined that it would be best to separate and consolidate these development standards collectively into Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally. In addition, incorporating a number of City Council adopted policies into this Residential Zones Generally section will assist staff in addressing common code compliance concerns more efficiently and consistently across all residentially zoned properties.

While the goal of this amendment is to codify already existing policies specific to residentially zoned properties and to ensure the Residential Zones Generally section of the Code functions as it is originally intended, staff is also incorporating a number of “clean-up” items. Among these “clean-up” items include the introduction of a rear yard setback in the SF and SF-DR zones, which did not previously exist. The addition of a 10-foot rear yard setback for habitable structures, and five (5) foot for accessory structures within the SF and SF-DR zones not only protects usable open space within the rear yard area, but it also ensures some level of privacy between adjacent properties. In addition, the new five-foot rear yard setback is in line with separation requirements for building to property lines required by the Fire Code. There are also properties within the SF and SF-DR zone that have alley access, which is not currently addressed in the Code. Therefore, staff has included added language differentiating “regular lots” and “alley loaded lots” to appropriately apply the new rear yard setback, as alley loaded lots will be subject to three (3) or 20 feet rear yard setback for garages, and five (5) feet for all other structures. MCTA 24-09 also provides clarification on what is included as part of calculating lot coverage for a property. Lastly, this amendment will also incorporate the prohibition of short-term rentals within the City, which will be included within Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally. Short-term rentals are already prohibited for Accessory and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units; therefore, this amendment will align with a current standard in the Code and provide some consistency. It will also address complaints received by Staff related to short-term rentals.

Another “clean-up” item that is being introduced into the SF and SF-DR zone is regarding the location of mechanical equipment, which is commonly brought up by residents. The side yard setback as it currently exists in the SF zone requires a minimum twelve-foot side yard on the side of the lot closest to the driveway while the other side yard shall be a minimum of five feet. The current SF zone also specifies that the twelve-foot side yard shall be maintained exclusive of any structural or other physical encroachments. The intent of the twelve-foot side yard setback is to allow for recreational vehicle storage behind the front main building line; however, not all SF zoned properties can accommodate a recreational vehicle and to some residents, maintaining the twelve-foot side yard exclusive of any structural or other physical encroachments limits the available locations for any proposed mechanical equipment. Therefore, staff has included a provision in the Code that allows for mechanical equipment such as air conditioning units, water softeners, solar panel equipment boxes, pool equipment, and/or generators, to be located within the required twelve-foot side yard (or ten-foot side yard setback for the SF-DR zone) subject to the following: a minimum of five (5) feet is maintained from the side property line, the equipment

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 4
For the Meeting of November 21, 2024
is screened from public view to the extent physically possible, and located behind the front main building line, or an existing gate and/or wall. It should be noted that although there is added language in the Code to allow for mechanical equipment to be located within the required 12-foot side yard setback, this allowance does not exempt an SF Zoned property or other applicable residentially zoned properties from meeting the parking requirements if the property owner desires to park a recreational vehicle on the property. In other words, if mechanical equipment is located within the 12-foot side yard setback, a resident may not request a deviation from the parking requirements to accommodate their recreational vehicle, as these types of allowed mechanical equipment could be easily relocated to other areas of the property.

In 2014, the City amended Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally to allow the keeping of certain types of fowl in a limited number as household pets, but also added the prohibition of roosters in all zones through Ordinance No. 1226. However, in that same ordinance, language was also added to Chapter 18.28 Single-Family Agriculture (SF-A) stating that chickens are permitted “in addition to those animals permitted under Chapter 18.20 Residential Zones Generally.” Staff, at that time, did not realize the new language in Chapter 18.28 could be interpreted to override the prohibition on roosters in Chapter 18.20. Therefore, as part of MCTA 24-09, staff is including an amendment to Chapter 18.28 to specify that “chickens for eggs (hens only)” and “fowl (not including roosters) for meat purposes” would be permitted in addition to adding the prohibition of roosters and peacocks. Additional clean-up items for the SF-A Zone including clarifying the requirements for the open corral and enclosed box stall for each horse as well as adding a minimum distance from any school building or hospital building.

In addition to the clean-up items listed above, the amendment will also be codifying numerous City Council adopted policies that have been in place that have not been incorporated into the Code. Since these policies are not available in the Code, applicants are not aware of these standards which can create confusion when corrections, based on the policies, are provided by Staff. Therefore, this amendment includes, but not limited to curb cuts and driveway access from the street in the Town Core area, fencing and decking encroachment into the slope area, mechanical equipment and screening, exterior fireplaces, fences and walls, flag poles and flags, canopy and other membrane structures, pool, spa and rockscape setbacks, and undergrounding of utilities.

The clean-up items and policies mentioned above are just some of the changes that are included with this amendment. There are several other changes, related to accessory and membrane structures, fences and walls, equipment screening, storage sheds, and utilities which are included in each of the ordinances included as exhibits to Resolution PC-1688 (Attachment 1). These changes are not intended to change the overall purpose of the single family standards, but meant to update the Code so it is more functional, provides clarification, and will make it more userfriendly for residents, contractors, and Staff to understand and navigate.

ALTERNATIVES
There are currently no alternatives proposed for this request; however, the Planning Commission may recommend changes to the proposed MCTA language.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Municipal Code Text Amendment 24-09 Page 5
For the Meeting of November 21, 2024
Respectfully submitted,
Anne Moore
Senior Planner
Attachments:

1. Resolution PC-1688

2. April 27, 2021 City Council Staff Report & Action Summary