San Dimas City Council
February 10, 2026

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY FEBRUARY 10, 2026 7:00 PM
SAN DIMAS COUNCIL CHAMBER
245 EAST BONITA AVENUE
A public agenda packet is available for review on the City’s website  www.sandimasca.gov or by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected].

Members of the public may observe the City Council meeting live on the City of San Dimas website at www.sandimasca.gov or on KWST Channel 3. To view from the website, select the Watch City Council Meetings blue button from the home page.
7:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Emmett Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Weber, Councilmember Rachel Bratakos, Councilmember Eric Nakano, Councilmember Ryan A. Vienna
CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE

PRESENTATION

1. Waste Management Update – Josh Goldman, Public Sector Solutions Manager

2. Southern California Edison Update – Marissa Castro­Salvati ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Members of the audience are invited to address the City Council on any item on this agenda or not on this agenda. Public comment will not be taken during each individual agenda item, except for public hearing items. Comments on public hearing items will be heard when that item is scheduled for discussion. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the legislative body is prohibited from engaging in discussion on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. However, your concerns may be referred to staff or set for discussion at a later date. Each speaker will be limited to speaking once for up to (3) three minutes.)
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a member of the City Council requests separate discussion.) CC1. Recognize Black History Month
CC2. Adopt Resolution 2026­10, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for the Pre­Paid Warrant Register of January 31, 2026 in the amount of $1,005,466.70 and Warrant Register of February 13, 2026 in the amount of $816,454.13.

CC3. Approve Minutes of the January 27, 2026 City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a member of the City Council requests separate discussion.) CC1. Recognize Black History Month
CC2. Adopt Resolution 2026­10, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for the Pre­Paid Warrant Register of January 31, 2026 in the amount of $1,005,466.70 and Warrant Register of February 13, 2026 in the amount of $816,454.13.

CC3. Approve Minutes of the January 27, 2026 City Council Meeting CC4. Approve Resolution 2026­11, Authorizing the Memorandum of Agreement with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments for Public Safety Funds
CC5. Adopt Resolution 2026­12, Authorizing the City Engineer to Proceed with the Preparation of a Report for the Annual Levy of Assessment for Open Space Maintenance District No. 1, (Tract No. 32818, Boulevard)
CC6. Adopt Resolution 2026­13, Authorizing the City Engineer to Proceed with the Preparation of a Report for the Annual Levy of Assessment for Open Space Maintenance District No. 1, Annexation No. 3 (Tract 32841, Northwoods)
CC7. Determine Claim Filed by David Brown on January 6, 2026 is Untimely and Approve Letter Returning Claim
CC8. Approve a Letter to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Opposing a Proposed Countywide Sales Tax Increase.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
RECOMMENDATION: Approve consent calendar with recommendations as presented in staff reports.

OTHER BUSINESS
OB1. Approve Budget Amendments and Receive and file the Mid­Year Budget Report RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council:

Approve Budget Appropriations as detailed in Attachment 1.

Receive and File the Mid­Year Report.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Members of the Audience (Speakers are limited to (3) minutes or as may be determined by the Chair.) CITY REPORTS
CR1. City Manager
CR2. City Attorney
CR3. Members of the City Council
Councilmembers’ Report on Meetings Attended at the Expense of the Local Agency (Pursuant to AB 1234 – G.C. §53232.3(d)
City Council Requests for Future Items, Comments and Updates CLOSED SESSION

CITY REPORTS
CR1. City Manager
CR2. City Attorney
CR3. Members of the City Council
Councilmembers’ Report on Meetings Attended at the Expense of the Local Agency (Pursuant to AB 1234 – G.C. §53232.3(d)
City Council Requests for Future Items, Comments and Updates CLOSED SESSION

1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 121 N San Dimas Avenue (APN: 8387­011­904)
City Negotiators: Brad McKinney, City Manager; Scott Wasserman, Parks and Recreation Director, Jeff Malawy, City Attorney
Negotiating Parties: Kathy Carrano; Anthony Carrano; City of San Dimas Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment

ADJOURNMENT
Notice Regarding Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the ADA, if you need assistance to participate in a city meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 394­6216. Early notification before the meeting you wish to attend will make it possible for the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102­35.104 ADA Title II].

Copies of documents distributed for the meeting are available in alternative formats upon request. Any writings or documents provided to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public review Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and on Fridays from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Administration Department and San Dimas Library. In addition, most documents are posted on the City's website at www.sandimasca.gov.

Posting Statement:  I declare under penalty of perjury that on February 6, 2026, I posted a true and correct copy of this agenda on the bulletin board in the Civic Center Plaza of City Hall at 245 E. Bonita Ave.,San Dimas Library 145 N. Walnut Ave., San Dimas Post Office 300 E. Bonita Ave., Von’s Via Verde Shopping Center 1160 Via Verde Ave., and on the City's website www.sandimasca.gov/agendas­minutes/as required by law.

February 6, 2026 Debra Black
Debra Black, City Clerk

CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION OF WM 1
2025 Highlights
City of San Dimas
February 10, 2026

CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION OF WM 2
Total Bulky Items Collected: 8,626
• Bulky Items: 6,355
• White Goods: 1,432
• Electronic Waste: 576
• Hazardous Household Waste: 257
• Total Tons Collected: 231.55
• That is 10 tons heavier than the Statue of
Liberty
Total Tons Collected: 34,761.88
• Residential: 16,512.88
• Commercial: 14,929.49
• Roll-Off: 3,319.51
• The total weight collected is 31x heavier than
the Oculus Jumbotron at SoFi Stadium
2025 Collection Breakdown | What are the Numbers?

3 Ongoing investment to Improve Material
Diversion:

Upgraded our 3 Regional Recycling
Facilities • Integrated AI and automation to increase
material recovery
Creating Renewable Energy
Transforming landfill gas into Renewable
Natural Gas (RNG): • 2025 Simi Valley Landfill • 2026 El Sobrante Landfill Expanding Organics Processing • Network of 7 facilities in S. California Investing in the
Future

CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY

INFORMATION OF WM
SB 1383 &
Compliance
Commercial &
Residential
Compliance
2025 Collaborative Accomplishments
Impact
City’s
commitment to
Recycling Right
Education
Education and
Outreach is key to
our success. It
goes beyond
compliance
8 Education
Events
Community Partnerships
Leveraging
partnerships to
promote better
recycling.

CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION OF WM 5
Connecting with our Community
Holiday Extravaganza Running Scared/Wellness Fair Azusa MRF Ribbon Cutting

CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION OF WM 6
Recycling All Stars

Marissa Castro-Salvati
The San Dimas City Council hereby
recognizes Marissa Castro-Salvati,
Southern California Edison
Representative for her dedication to the
San Dimas community.

The Council congratulates Marissa on
her future endeavors and wishes
continued success.

In Witness Thereof, I, Mayor Emmett G.

Badar, have hereunto set my hand and
caused the seal of the City of San Dimas to
be affixed this 10th, day of February 2026.
___________________________ ____________________________ Mayor City Clerk

Black History Month
W
HEREAS, Black History Month is an annual celebration of achievements by black Americans and a time for recognizing the central role of African Americans in US history; and
W HEREAS, this observance affords a special opportunity to become more knowledgeable about black heritage, and to honor the many black leaders who have contributed to the progress of our community, state, and nation; and
W
HEREAS, such knowledge can strengthen the understanding by all citizens regarding the issues of human rights, the great strides that have been made in the crusade to eliminate barriers to equality for minority groups, and the continuing struggle against racial discrimination and poverty; and W HEREAS, February has been designated National Black History Month, and the City of San Dimas calls upon all residents as well as others to observe and commemorate Black History month and to rededicate themselves to creating a world where the rights and the contributions of all would be respected, acknowledged and celebrated.

N
OW THEREFORE, I Mayor Emmett G. Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Weber, Councilmembers Rachel Bratakos, Eric Nakano and Ryan A. Vienna do hereby proclaim February 2026 as National Black History Month.

I
N WITNESS THEREOF, I, Mayor Emmett G. Badar, have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of San Dimas to be affixed this 10th day of February 2026.
___________________________________ Attest: ____________________________________ Mayor City Clerk

RESOLUTION 2026-10

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS JANUARY 31 AND FEBRUARY 13, 2026
WHEREAS, the following listed demands have been audited by the Director of Administrative Services; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services has certified as to the availability of funds for payment thereto; and
WHEREAS, the register of audited demands has been submitted to the City Council for approval.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby approve Pre-Paid Warrant Register of January 31, 2026 in the amount of $1,005,466.70 and Warrant Register of February 13, 2026 in the amount of $816,454.13.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 2026. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that Resolution 2026-10 was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 10th, day of February, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

ACTION MINUTES
JANUARY 27, 2026, 7:00 PM

REGULAR MEETING
Council Members Present: Mayor Emmett Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Weber, Councilmember Rachel Bratakos, Councilmember Eric Nakano, Councilmember Ryan A. Vienna Staff: City Manager Brad McKinney, Director of Public Works Shari Garwick, Director of Administrative Services Michael O’Brien, Director of Community Development Luis Torrico, Director of Parks and Recreation Scott Wasserman, City Attorney Jeff Malawy, City Clerk Debra Black, Senior Management Analyst Lauren Marshall
Call to Order: 7:00 PM

CONSENT ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Adopt Resolution 2026-08, A Resolution
of the City Council of the City of San
Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for
the Warrant Register of January 30, 2026
in the Amount of $535,628.30.

2. Approve the Minutes of the January 13,
2026 City Council Meeting

3. Adopt Resolution 2026-09, Annual
Update of Parking Prohibitions on Certain
City Streets

4. Consideration of Award of Contract to
Go2Zero Strategies for SB 1383 Outreach
Services in the Amount of $49,185.50 (SB
1383 Grant Funding) and Optional
Miscellaneous Solid Waste Outreach
Services in the Amount of $21,792.50
(General Fund), and Approval of Overall
Project Budget of $70,978.00 Including
Contingency
MOTION: Motion/seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Weber/Councilmember Bratakos to
approve consent items 1-3 and 5. Motion
carried 5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
MOTION: Motion/seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Weber/Councilmember Vienna to
approve consent item 4. Motion carried 5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

OTHER BUSINESS ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Receive and File the Progress Report on
the Project to Restore a Historic Santa Fe
Cantilever Railroad Signal and Caboose
and Relocate them to the San Dimas
Railroad Museum in Rhoads Park
City Council consensus to continue the
discussion and direct staff to coordinate with
Mr. LaCiura to attend the meeting to discuss
the proposed project.

CITY REPORTS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

Approve Minutes of the January 27, 2026 City Council Meeting Page 2 For the Meeting of February 10, 2026
a. City Manager City Manager McKinney reminded the
community of the dog park’s annual
maintenance closure and approximate
reopening in five weeks.
b. City Attorney City Attorney announced that the City Council will be meeting in Closed Session after the
open session.

City Clerk Black announced the City’s
Municipal Election on June 2, 2026, and
nomination period of February 9 – March 6,
2026.
c. Members of the City Council
Reports on Meetings Attended AB 1234
(G.C. §53232.3(d))
None.

CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR

FUTURE ITEMS

COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Request by Councilmember Bratakos
supported by Mayor Badar to agendize a
Study Session to review the City Council
absence policy.

CLOSED SESSION ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR

NEGOTIATORS
City designated representatives: Jeff
Malawy, City Attorney;
Unrepresented employee: City Manager
Following the closed session, the City
Attorney made a public announcement as
follows: The City Council held the two closed
session items listed on the agenda. The City
Council discussed the items and gave
direction to staff, but no reportable action was
taken.

2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY

NEGOTIATORS
Property: 121 N San Dimas Avenue
(APN: 8387-011-904)
City Negotiators: Brad McKinney, City
Manager; Scott Wasserman, Parks and
Recreation Director, Jeff Malawy, City
Attorney
Negotiating Parties: Kathy Carrano;
Anthony Carrano; City of San Dimas
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of
Payment
Following the closed session, the City
Attorney made a public announcement as
follows: The City Council held the two closed
session items listed on the agenda. The City
Council discussed the items and gave
direction to staff, but no reportable action was
taken.

Adjourned: 9:00 P.M.

I, Debra Black, City Clerk attest that these draft minutes are accurate and reflective of the actions taken by the City Council.

The minutes represent actions taken during the meeting of the City Council. Complete Council Member discussion on Regular Session meeting items can be viewed in archived video

Approve Minutes of the January 27, 2026 City Council Meeting Page 3 For the Meeting of February 10, 2026
recordings on the City’s YouTube Channel at https://www.youtube.com/@cityofsandimas6330.

Public submittals on items are retained in the administrative record and can be viewed in the City’s archived Records Center at sandimasca.gov/city_documents. ___________________________
Debra Black, MMC
City Clerk

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of February 10, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Travis Sais, Assistant City Manager
Subject: Approve Resolution 2026-11, Authorizing the Memorandum of Agreement with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments for Public Safety Funds ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The City was previously awarded a $200,000 Public Safety Grant through the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG). A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was executed to administer the funds on a reimbursement basis and has since expired on December 31, 2025. The City is requesting a non-substantive update to the MOA to extend the invoice submission deadline to June 30, 2026. This item seeks Council approval of the updated agreement.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council:
• Approve Resolution 2026-11, authorizing a Memorandum of Agreement between the City of San Dimas and SGVCOG related to the Public Safety Grant. • Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the agreement and take all necessary actions to implement the updated agreement terms.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the updated agreement. The total grant amount remains at $200,000, of which $59,851 has been expended. The remaining balance of $140,149 will continue to be administered on a reimbursement basis. No additional City funds are required.

Approve Resolution 2026-11, Authorizing the Memorandum of Agreement with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments for Public Safety Funds Page 2 For the Meeting of February 10, 2026

BACKGROUND
On May 14, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-32, approving the acceptance of a $200,000 Public Safety Grant awarded by SGVCOG and authorizing execution of a Memorandum of Agreement. The grant, made possible through Assembly Bill 106, supports local public safety initiatives. The original staff report noted the funds would be used to enhance public safety technology and community safety, with expenditures reimbursed upon submission of eligible invoices. The MOA outlines the City’s responsibilities, including compliance with AB 106 requirements and timely submission of documentation for reimbursement.

On May 27, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-30, authorizing an amendment to MOA to extend the submission deadline to December 31, 2025.

Since the grant was awarded, a total of $59,850.96 has been expended and reimbursed. The remaining grant funding balance is $140,149.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The original Memorandum of Agreement expired on December 31, 2025. City staff is requesting a non-substantive update to the MOA to extend the invoice submission deadline to June 30, 2026.

This extension allows additional time for planned expenditures and ensures the City can fully utilize the awarded funds. The funds are being used to support local public safety initiatives, including the installation of new security cameras, the purchase of drones with supporting equipment and software, emergency operations communication technology enhancements, and other technology and security improvements. These tools are intended to enhance situational awareness and support coordination efforts that strengthen community safety and emergency preparedness. All other terms of the agreement remain unchanged. The amendment does not affect the amount of funding, scope of work, or the City’s obligations under the original MOA.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may choose to not approve the agreement, which may impact the City’s ability to fully utilize the grant and receive reimbursement for eligible expenses.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Travis Sais
Assistant City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2026-11 Approving the SGVCOG MOA for Public Safety

2. Memorandum of Agreement with SGVCOG

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2026-11

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS,

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS AND THE SAN GABRIEL

VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS

FOR A PUBLIC SAFETY GRANT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved Resolution 2024-32 authorizing acceptance of a $200,000 Public Safety Grant awarded by the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG), and executed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) outlining the terms for disbursement and reimbursement of grant funds; and WHEREAS, the grant funding is made available through Assembly Bill 106 and is intended to support public safety initiatives in the City of San Dimas; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved Resolution 2025-30 authorizing an extension of the term of the agreement and deadline for invoice submittals to December 31, 2025; and
WHEREAS, City staff is requesting a non-substantive update to the MOA to extend the the deadline for invoice submittals to June 30, 2026, to allow additional time for use and reimbursement of grant funds; and
WHEREAS, the grant funding amount stated in the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) represents the remaining balance of the original grant, after deducting the expenditures already incurred, totaling $140,149; and
WHEREAS, all other provision of the MOA remained unchanged, and this update does not alter the scope of work, or responsibilities of the City under the agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby resolve that:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of San Dimas and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute the agreement and take all necessary actions to carry out the terms of the revised agreement.

SECTION 3. The City clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 2026.

Resolution 2026-11 Page 2
MOA Between City of San Dimas and the SGVCOG for Public Safety Grant February 10, 2026
____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that Resolution 2026-11 was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 10th, day of February, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, City Clerk

ATTACHMENT 2

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

FUNDING MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS

AND THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SGVCOG) This Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) is by and between the City of San Dimas (City) and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) to be effective as of the date signed by both Parties.

RECITALS:

A. The SGVCOG was established to have a unified voice to maximize resources and advocate for regional and member interests to improve the quality of life in the San Gabriel Valley within the jurisdictions of its member cities and its unincorporated areas.

B. Pursuant to Senate Bill No. 104 (2023), Section 19.564 (b)(57), $1,000,000 was allocated to the SGVCOG by the Department of Housing and Community Development for a homeless services pilot program. The scope of this funded was expanded per Assembly Bill 106, Section 19.564(b)(57) (2024) to include public safety support (the “SB 104/AB 106 Funds”).

C. After consultation with State Senator Rubio’s office concerning the distribution of funds, it was agreed that a portion of the funds should be distributed to the City.

D. By way of this MOA, the City and the SGVCOG desire to set forth the terms for distribution of the SB 104/AB 106 Funds (the “Program”).

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree to the following:

I. TERM:

The term of this MOA shall commence upon execution of the MOA by both Parties and shall continue until June 30, 2026, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH OF THE PARTIES:

A. SGVCOG

1. Within forty-five (45) days of receipt of a proper invoice for allowable expenses, reimburse the City up to a not to exceed amount of One Hundred Forty Thousand One Hundred Forty-Nine Dollars ($140,149) in SB 104/AB 106 Funds.

2. Coordinate conference calls and/or meetings with City as necessary.

3. Provide any updated point-of-contact described in Section IV.B to serve as the SGVCOG’s Project Manager with name, title, and contact information.

B. City

1. Be solely responsible for expending the SB 104/AB 106 Funds for purposes consistent

with Assembly Bill 106, Section 19.564(b)(57), which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and as it may be amended.

2. Submit detailed invoices, and further documentation reasonably necessary to ensure the funds were expended consistent with Assembly Bill 106 by June 30, 2026.

3. Respond to SGVCOG requests related to the Program in a timely manner.

4. Maintain membership in the SGVCOG during the entire term of this MOA.

5. Coordinate conference calls and/or meetings with the SGVCOG as necessary.

6. Provide any updated point-of-contact described in Section IV.B to serve as the City’s Project Manager with name, title, and contact information.

III. AMENDMENTS:

For any change which affects any term or condition included under this MOA, an amendment to the MOA shall be prepared and executed by the City and by the SGVCOG.

IV. PROJECT MANAGEMENT:

A. For purposes of this MOA, the SGVCOG designates the following individual as its Project Manager to which any notices required under this MOA shall be sent:

Jonathan Horton, Management Analyst
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
1333 S. Mayflower Avenue, Ste. 360
Monrovia, CA 91016
[email protected]
B. For purposes of this MOA, the City of San Dimas designates the following individual as its Project Manager to which any notices required under this MOA shall be sent:

Anissa Livas, Senior Management Analyst
City of San Dimas
245 E. Bonita Avenue San Dimas, CA 91773
[email protected]
C. Either Party may change its Project Manager or contacts upon written notice to the other Party.

V. TERMINATION:

This MOA may be terminated for cause at any time for a material default by one of the Parties upon written notice to the applicable Project Manager. In the event of termination for cause, termination will be in effect three days after deposit of the written notice in the U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid, unless otherwise stated at a later time in the written notice.

VI. INDEMNITY:

A. Neither the SGVCOG, its member agencies, or their respective officers, employees, consultants or volunteers (the “SGVCOG Indemnitees), shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or committed to be done by the City or its respective officers, agents, employees, or volunteers under or in connection with the performance of this MOA.

B. Neither the City or its respective officers, employees, consultants, or volunteers (the “City Indemnitees), shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or committed to be done by the SGVCOG Indemnitees under or in connection with the performance of this MOA C. The City shall indemnify, defend and hold the SGVCOG Indemnitees harmless from and against any liability, claims, losses, actions, and expenses, including without limitation, defense costs, any costs or liability on account of expenditure of the funds, bodily injury, death or personal injury of any person or for damage to or loss of use of property, any legal fees and any claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of or resulting from the City’s obligations under this MOA, unless caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the SGVCOG Indemnitees.

D. The SGVCOG shall indemnify, defend and hold the City Indemnitees harmless from and against any liability, claims, losses, actions, and expenses, including without limitation, defense costs, any costs or liability on account of bodily injury, death or personal injury of any person or for damage to or loss of use of property, any legal fees and any claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of or resulting from the SGVCOG’s obligations under of this MOA, unless caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City Indemnitees.

VII. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

A. In performing this MOA, neither the City nor SGVCOG is a contractor, agent, or employee of the other. Neither the City or SGVCOG shall represent themselves as contractors, agents or employees of the other Party and shall have no powers to bind the other Party in contract or otherwise.

B. This MOA, along with the applicable expenditure requirements of Assembly Bill 106, constitute the entire understanding between the Parties, with respect to the subject matter herein. The MOA shall not be amended except in writing signed by the Parties.

C. Neither Party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligations hereunder to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by unforeseen causes including acts of God, floods, earthquakes, fires, acts of a public enemy, pandemic, and government acts beyond the control and without fault or negligence of the affected Party. Each Party hereto shall give notice promptly to the other of the nature and extent of any such circumstances claimed to delay, hinder, or prevent performance of any obligations

under this MOA.

D. Neither Party shall assign this MOA, or any part thereof, without the prior written consent and prior approval of the other Party, nor any assignment without consent shall be void and unenforceable.

E. This Agreement shall be governed by California law and any applicable federal law.

F. If any provision of this MOA is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

G. The terms of this MOA shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each of the Parties and their respective approved successors and assigns.

In witness whereof, the Parties enter into this MOA on the date of last execution by the Parties.

FOR THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS
By:_____________________________
Brad McKinney City Manager
Date:__________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

Jeff Malawy Debra Black
City Attorney City Clerk

FOR THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
By:

Marisa Creter
Executive Director
Date:_________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Cassie Trapesonian
General Counsel

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of February 10, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Scott Wasserman, Director of Parks & Recreation Subject: Adopt Resolution 2026-12, Authorizing the City Engineer to Proceed with the Preparation of a Report for the Annual Levy of Assessment for Open Space Maintenance District No. 1, (Tract No. 32818, Boulevard) ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Adoption of a resolution required to proceed with the preparation of an Annual Report for the annual Levy of Assessment for Open Space Maintenance District No. 1, Tract 32818, Boulevard.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council:
• Adopt Resolution 2026-12, Boulevard, authorizing the City Engineer to proceed with the preparation of the annual report for the annual levy of assessments for the Boulevard Open Space District.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

Commence Proceedings for Annual Levy of Assessment for Boulevard Open Space Maintenance District Page 2
For the Meeting of February 10, 2026

BACKGROUND
The Boulevard Open Space Maintenance District was formed under the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Division 15, Part 2, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The Act further establishes procedures for the annual levy of assessments which begins with the preparation of an Engineer’s Report. Last year, the City Council filed the annual assessment for Tract No. 32818, Boulevard Open Space Maintenance District.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
To initiate the proceedings for Fiscal Year 2026-27, staff is requesting authorization to proceed with the preparation of an Engineer’s Report for the Boulevard Open Space Maintenance District.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council could decide not to adopt Resolution 2026-12, authorizing the City Engineer to proceed with the preparation of the Annual Reports for the annual Levy of Assessments for the Boulevard Open Space District. Under this scenario, the City Council would be moving forward without an approved assessment, which would lead to all costs associated with the maintenance of the Boulevard Assessment District being subsidized by the City’s General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This is an ongoing maintenance item and does not require environmental review.

Respectfully submitted,
Scott Wasserman
Director of Parks & Recreation
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2026-12 Boulevard

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2026-12

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PROCEED WITH THE

PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, (TRACT NO. 32818, BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, the San Dimas City Council formed “Open Space Maintenance District No. 1” under Resolution No. 77-57 pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Landscaping and Light Act of 1972, “being Division 15, Part 2, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, said district was established for the maintenance and restoration of landscaping improvements within the city limits of the City of San Dimas; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Dimas, desires to initiate proceedings to levy annual assessments as required following the formation of said district for the annual levy of assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2026 and ending June 30, 2027, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby resolve that:

SECTION 1. The referenced “Open Space Maintenance District No. 1” be continued for the maintenance and restoration of landscaping improvements as set forth in the “Report” to be presented to this City Council for consideration.

SECTION 2. There are no substantial improvements to be added to said maintenance district, nor are there any proposed changes to the boundaries of the maintenance district.

SECTION 3. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare a report in accordance with Section 22565 and 22622 of said Street and Highways Code.

SECTION 4. Upon completion, said “Report” shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to Sections 22623 and 22624 of said Streets and Highways Code.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 2026. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Resolution 2026-12 Page 2
Prepare Engineer’s report for Annual Levy Assessment for Boulevard Open Space February 10, 2026

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that Resolution 2026-12 was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 10th, day of February, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, City Clerk

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of February 10, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Scott Wasserman, Director of Parks & Recreation Subject: Adopt Resolution 2026-13, Authorizing the City Engineer to Proceed with the Preparation of a Report for the Annual Levy of Assessment for Open Space Maintenance District No. 1, Annexation No. 3 (Tract 32841, Northwoods) ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Adoption of a resolution required to proceed with the preparation of the Annual Report for the annual Levy of Assessment for Open Space Maintenance District No. 1, Annexation No. 3, Tract 32841, Northwoods.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council:
• Adopt Resolution 2026-13, Northwoods, authorizing the City Engineer to proceed with the preparation of Annual Reports for the annual Levy of Assessments for the Northwoods Open Space District.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
The Northwoods Open Space Maintenance District was formed under the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Division 15, Part 2, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The Act further establishes procedures for the annual levy of assessments

Commencing Proceedings for Annual Levy of Assessment for Northwoods Open Space Maintenance District Page 2
For the Meeting of February 10, 2026
which begins with the preparation of an Engineer’s Report. Last year, the City Council filed the annual assessment for Tract No. 32841, Northwoods Open Space Maintenance District.

On May 27, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-29 approving no increase in the levied assessment with the removal of any additional work over and above what the current assessment can pay for to provide service in the Open Space Maintenance District No. 1, Annexation No. 3 (Tract No. 32841, Northwoods).

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
To initiate proceedings for Fiscal Year 2026–27, staff is requesting authorization to proceed with the preparation of an Engineer’s Report for the Northwoods Open Space Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2026-27, covering the period from July 1, 2026, through the district’s sunset on January 1, 2027.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council could decide not to adopt Resolution 2026-13, authorizing the City Engineer to proceed with the preparation of annual reports for the annual levy of assessments for the Northwoods Open Space District. Under this scenario, the Engineer’s Report would not be generated and all expenses related to the maintenance of the Northwoods Assessment District would be borne by the City’s General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This is an ongoing maintenance item and does not require additional environmental review.

Respectfully submitted,
Scott Wasserman
Director of Parks & Recreation
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2026-13 Northwoods

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2026-13

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PROCEED WITH THE

PREPERATION OF A REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (TRACT NO. 32841, NORTHWOODS) WHEREAS, the San Dimas City Council formed “Open Space Maintenance District No. 1, Annexation No. 3” under Resolution No. 78-38 pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Landscaping and Light Act of 1972, “being Division 15, Part 2, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, said District was established for the maintenance and restoration of landscaping improvements within the city limits of the City of San Dimas; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Dimas, desires to initiate proceedings to levy annual assessments as required following the formation of said district for the annual levy of assessments for the 2026-2027 fiscal year, covering July 1, 2026, through the district’s sunset on January 1, 2027.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby resolve that:

SECTION 1. The referenced “Open Space Maintenance District No. 1, Annexation No. 3” be continued for the maintenance and restoration of landscaping improvements as set forth in the “Report to be presented to this City Council for consideration.

SECTION 2. There are no substantial improvements to be added to said maintenance district, nor are there any proposed changes to the boundaries of the maintenance district.

SECTION 3. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare a report in accordance with Section 22565 and 22622 of said Street and Highways Code, for the period of July 1, 2026 to January 1, 2027.

SECTION 4. Upon completion, said “Report” shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to Sections 22623 and 22624 of said Streets and Highways Code.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 2026. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Resolution 2026-13 Page 2
Prepare Engineer’s Report for Annual Levy Assessment for Northwoods Open Space February 10, 2026

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that Resolution 2026-13 was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 10th, day of February, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, City Clerk

Director of Administrative
Services
Michael O’Brien
Director of Community
Development
Luis Torrico
Director of Parks and
Recreation
Scott Wasserman
Director of Public Works
Shari Garwick
245 East Bonita Avenue ∙ San Dimas ∙ California 91773-3002 ∙ (909) 394-6200 ∙ Fax (909) 394-6209 □ sandimasca.gov 01171.0029 2087172.1
City Council
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
Eric Weber, Mayor Pro Tem – District 1
Rachel Bratakos - District 3
Eric Nakano – District 2
Ryan A. Vienna - District 4
City Manager
Brad McKinney
Assistant City Manager
Travis Sais
City Attorney
Jeff Malawy

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

RETURN OF UNTIMELY CLAIM WITHOUT FURTHER ACTION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 911.3
Re: Brown v. City of San Dimas
David Brown

Notice is hereby given that the above-referenced claim, which was presented to the City of San Dimas on January 6, 2026, was determined by the City Council at its meeting held on Tuesday, February 10, 2026, to be untimely and is being returned to you because it was not presented within six months after the event or occurrence as required by law. See Sections 901 and 912 of the Government Code. Because the claim was not presented within the time allowed by law, no action was taken on the claim.

Your only recourse at this time is to apply without delay to the City of San Dimas for leave to present a late claim. See Sections 911.4 to 912.2, inclusive, and Section 946.6 of the Government Code. Under some circumstances, leave to present a late claim will be granted.

See Section 911.6 of the Government Code.

WARNING
This time limitation applies only to causes of action arising under California law for which a claim is mandated by the California Government Tort Claims Act.

Government Code Sections 900 et seq. Other causes of action, including those arising under federal law, may have different time limitations for filing.

You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you desire to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately.

Sincerely,
Debra Black
City Clerk

EFkJAN 6 2025

DIMASSANCITY OF SAN

ADMINISTRATION
1960
City Clerk Stamp

CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS
For damages to Persons or Personal Property, 0
Aeceived by, via US MAIL 0 Inter -Office Mail 0 Over the Counter A claim must be filed with the City Clerk of the City of San Dimas within six ( 6) months after which the incident or event6ccurred. Be sure your claim is against the City of San Dimas, not another public entity. Where space is insufficient, please use additional paper and identify information by paragraph number. Completed claims must be mailed or delivered to the City Clerk, the City of San Dimas, 245 E. Bonita Avenue, San Dimas, CA 91773- 3002 The undersigned respectfully submits the following claim and information relative to damage to persona and/ or personal property:

1. Name of Claimant
a. Address of Claimantb. Telephone Number
d. Social Security No.

2. Name, telephone and post office address to which claimant desires notices to be sent If, other than above:

3. Occurrence or eve t from which the claim arises:

Date i/
1,
104
Time. a. m./ p. m.
c. Place ( exact& specific location
d. How an'd under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? Specify the particular occurrence, event., act or omission you claim caused the injury or damage Use additional paper if necessary
Len ) 74_ 0^__11A I % J—IIIIII 1r) a
e. What particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged dameA or
injury?

4. Give a description of the injury, property damage or loss, so far as is known at the time of this claim. If there 11810%&- A w%,e%

5. Give th

6. Name and addres? of any
ing the damage orllNury:

7. Name and address of the owner of any damaged property:

8. Damages claims:
a. Amount claimed as of this date: $
b. Estimated amount of future costs: 70
c. Total amount claimed: $
d. Basis for computation of amounts claimed ( attach copies of all bills, invoices, estimates, etc.)

9. Names and addresses of all witnesses, hospitals, doctors,, etc. a.
b.

C.
d.

10. Any additional information that might be helpful in considering this claim:

J0 ZP
WARNING: IT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE TO FILE A FALSE CLAIM! ( Penal Code 72; Insurance Code § 556. 1)
Claimant' s signature

David Brown
December 30, 2025
City of San Dimas
Attention: City Clerk
245 E. Bonita Avenue
San Dimas, CA 91773 -3 002
Re: Formal Claim for Damages — Unlawful Permit Revocation and Violation of Federal Civil Rights
Dear City Clerk,
I am writing to formally present this claim for damages arising from the unlawful revocation of my sidewalk vending permit, which was initially granted and later revoked by the City of San Dimas. The City' s actions, including the fabrication of a new application packet, retroactive alteration of permitting requirements, and discretionary enforcement not authorized by law, were unjustified and caused substantial financial. and personal harm. This claim also serves as formal notice of my intent to pursue federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S. C. § 1983 for violations of my rights to due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Plaintiff discovered the falsification of the June 14, 2024 application packet on or about November 1, 2025, after consulting an Al analysis tool that suggested checking the document' s metadata. Upon inspection, Plaintiff confirmed that the packet had been created and modified after the permit approval date. Prior to, that discovery, Plaintiff had exercised reasonable diligence by requesting the administrative record and related materials, but the City withheld or misrepresented key documents. - Plaintiff had no reason to suspect the existence of fabricated records, and discovery required specialized metadata review outside ordinary means.

Accordingly, under the delayed discovery rule and principles of fraudulent concealment and equitable estoppel, the statute of. limitations did not begin to run until November 1, 2025.

Factual Background
The City' s Procedural Misconduct
The City' s narrative is internally contradictory. The official Sidewalk Vending Instruction Sheet provided to me on May 17, 2024 was a valid City document in full force and effect. It directed applicants to the Administrative Services/ Finance Department, required Live Scan only for food vendors, and did not reference any discretionary review board or land -use process. The City' s later assertion that this packet was " incorrect" is a false and fraudulent misrepresentation.

The City' s own timeline exposes this misconduct. The City claims it received a complaint on Saturday, May 18, 2024.' Code Enforcement offices are closed on Saturdays, making this claim implausible. May 18 was also the first full day of my lawful vending operations after pen -nit approval. Despite the alleged complaint, the City took no enforcement action until May 30, 2024, a twelve - day delay inconsistent with a ministerial -process and indicative of discretionary coordination to revoke my permit.

Metadata conclusively proves that the so- called " correct" application packet did not exist when my permit was approved. The file titled " Sidewalk Vending Application Packet ( 3). pdf' was created on June 10, 2024 at 3: 28: 52 PM and modified on June 14, 2024 at 2: 06: 52 PM by Michael O' Brien, Director of Administrative Services. At 2: 18 PM on June 14, 2024, City employee Stephanie Italia emailed this packet to another vendor, copying John Villalobos, Ryan Hale, and Luis Torrico, and stated that vending must cease until a permit was obtained. This sequence proves the City fabricated a new application packet in mid -June and retroactively deployed it to invalidate any already - issued permit.

Transfer from Administrative Services to Community Development At the time of my approval, sidewalk vending permits were processed through Administrative Services/Finance. Beginning June 14, 2024, the City summarily shifted permitting authority to the Community Development Department. No ordinance, City Council action, or lawful delegation authorized this transfer. City staff cannot unilaterally reassign permit authority between departments. This unauthorized transfer, coupled with the newly fabricated packet, demonstrates that the City rewrote the rules midstream to strip me of vested rights.

Unlawful Expansion of Permit Requirements
The June 14 packet imposed requirements not authorized by Ordinance 1265 or San Dimas Municipal Code section 5. 32. 0.40, including ,general liability insurance and a separate " Sidewalk Vending Permit" in addition to a business license. When my permit was approved on May 17, Michael O' Brien expressly stated that the business license functioned as the sidewalk vending permit because the City had not created a separate form. The June 14 packet reversed this position and created duplicative permitting not adopted by ordinance. Only the City Council may amend the Municipal Code; staff cannot impose newre ents by administrative packet. Thisk et. further confirms that the June 14 packet was an after -the -fact fabrication.

The June 14 instructions also improperly required sidewalk vendors to submit to the License and Permit Hearing Board and to complete a generic Community Development application designed for conditional ' use permits, variances, tract maps, CEQA review, zoning analysis, and stormwater mitigation. These requirements are facially incompatible with sidewalk vending and unlawfully converted a ministerial permit into a discretionary land -use process.

Contradictory Enforcement and Arbitrary Conduct
On June 18, 2024, John Villalobos emailed me stating I could continue vending during review if I submitted the new application. Hours later, Luis Torrico told me by phone that I must

immediately cease operations. These contradictory directives underscore the arbitrary, discretionary, and unlawful nature ofthe City' s enforcement.

Citations and Court Ruling Based on Misrepresentation
Between June 21 and June 23, 2024, the City issued citations numbered 2064, 20659 2066, and 2070. Although I appealed, the Los Angeles County Superior Court affirmed the citations and ordered payment of $3, 852. 50. That ruling was based on materially false and perjurious representations by John Villalobos and Ryan Hale that I lacked a valid sidewalk vending permit.

I intend to file a motion for reconsideration based on newly discovered metadata evidence proving the City fabricated the June 14 packet and misled the court.

Wrongful Citations Issued to Angela Brown
Citations numbered 2067, 2068, and 2069, totaling $ 1, 850, were wrongfully issued to my sister, Angela Brown, who was hospitalized with stage four cancer and recovering from hip surgery at the time. Code Enforcement later admitted these citations were issued after running her license plate and mistaking her for an unknown female vendor. The City dismissed the citations only after Angela was forced to submit hospital records. This reckless misuse of enforcement authority caused severe emotional distress to both Angela and me.

Administrative Record Withheld
In my Superior Court appeal, the City failed to provide the approximately 80- page administrative record until after the hearing concluded. This deprived me of a fair appeal and concealed the fabricated June 14 packet and related misconduct.

Violation of State and Constitutional Law
The City' s conduct violated California Senate Bill 946 by imposing discretionary review and retroactive requirements on sidewalk vending. It violated - due process by revoking an issued permit based on fabricated rules and false statements. It violated equal protection by selectively and arbitrarily enforcing requirements not authorized by law. The City' s action' s were ultra vires, retroactive, and unconstitutional.

Coordinated Misconduct and Municipal Liability
The events of June 10 through June 14, 2024 demonstrate coordinated misconduct by senior officials, including Michael O' Brien, John Villalobos, Ryan Hale, Luis Torrico, and Stephanie Italia. These were not isolated errors but coordinated acts taken under color of law. The Mayor and City Manager, who oversee these departments, are ultimately responsible for the policies, customs, and practices that enabled this misconduct.

These actions expose the City to liability under 42 U.S. C. § 1983 and municipal liability under Monell v. Department of Social Services. Should litigation be required, the City also faces mandatory fee -shifting under 42 U.S. C. § 1988.

After discovering the fraudulent creation of the June 14 application packet and placing the City on notice ofthese facts, senior City officials had — and continue to have — a clear opportunity to correct the unlawful revocation of my permit, rescind the citations, and remedy the procedural violations. Instead, the City has c ' ontinued to enforce the fabricated framework, defend it in court, withhold the administrative record, and impose financial penalties based on false representations that I did not possess a valid sidewalk vending permit. This ongoing course of conduct, despite clear evidence of wrongdoing, constitutes deliberate indifference to rnv constitutional rights and exposes the City to liability under 42 U. S. C. § 1983* Damages
As a direct and proximate result ofthe City' s
actions, I suffered substantial damages, including
but not limited to lost revenue, forced shutdown of lawful business operations, emotional distress, reputational harm, payment of $3, 852. 50 in citations and fees, exposure to $1, 850 in wrongful citations issued to my sister, and additional consequential damages. The total amount of damages claimed exceeds $ 10, 000 and will be proven at trial if necessary.

Request for Resolution
I respectfully request that the City of San Dimas:

1. Reinstate my sidewalk vending permit or provide a lawful path to reinstatement.

2. Compensate me for all damages suffered as a result of the City' s unlawful conduct.

3. Provide a written explanation for the fabrication of the June 14 application packet, the unauthorized transfer of permitting authority, and the imposition of unlawful discretionary requirements.

If this matter is not resolved, I will pursue all available legal remedies, including federal civil rights litigation.

Dv' wn

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of February 10, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Travis Sais, Assistant City Manager
Subject: Approve a Letter to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Opposing a Proposed Countywide Sales Tax Increase.
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The attached letter formally opposes the proposed Healthcare Funding Restoration Act and its associated 0.50% countywide transactions and use tax. This measure is currently being considered by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors for inclusion on the June 2, 2026 ballot.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
• Approve a letter to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors opposing a proposed countywide sales tax increase.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is currently considering the Healthcare Funding Restoration Act, a proposal that seeks to implement a 0.50% countywide transactions and use tax that would sunset on October 1, 2031. Cities were only recently made aware of this proposal.

Staff was notified on February 5, 2026 by Los Angeles County Supervisor Barger’s Office that a

Approve a Letter to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Opposing a Proposed Countywide Sales Tax Increase. Page 2
For the Meeting of February 10, 2026
motion to place the measure on the June 2, 2026 primary election ballot is being voted on by the Board of Supervisors on February 10, 2026. While the intent is to utilize the funding generated from the measure for healthcare services being cut under provisions in H.R.1, also known as the” One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” the proposal raises important concerns related to tax burden, governance, and local accountability.

Historically, the City of San Dimas has seen a consistent trend where revenue generated by local taxpayers is redirected toward regional agencies. This shift often leaves cities with the burden of solely funding direct services—such as public safety and infrastructure maintenance—while their revenue authority is incrementally diminished.

Past experiences with County-led tax measures, specifically Measure H (2017) and Measure A (2024), provide a baseline for evaluating the return on investment for San Dimas residents. While these measures were designed to address regional issues like homelessness and housing, the actual allocation of funds back to the City of San Dimas has been disproportionately low compared to the tax dollars contributed by the community.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
This countywide tax proposal presents several challenges for local governance and fiscal stability.

Due to its last-minute introduction, cities are left with less than 30 days to consider competing ballot measures, a timeline that severely undermines local autonomy. If the proposed County measure is not structured to sit atop the existing 10.5% state-mandated cap, it threatens to significantly reduce or entirely eliminate the remaining sales tax capacity for individual cities. This is particularly concerning for San Dimas, with a current rate of 9.75%, the City has very limited room under the state-mandated ceiling. A countywide measure of this nature could strip cities of their ability to generate local revenue for community-specific needs.

Additionally, the local return for San Dimas under similar County measures has been remarkably poor. For instance, while residents contributed over $15 million to Measure H between 2017 and 2025, the City received a negligible $30,000 in return. A similar pattern is emerging with the recently adopted Measure A, which is projected to generate $4 million annually from the San Dimas community while returning less than $150,000 per year in direct local funding. This persistent gap indicates that the proposed 0.50% tax would likely function as a transfer from San Dimas taxpayers to County-managed operations and third-party providers, rather than delivering tangible benefits to the residents who bear the financial burden.

Beyond this fiscal drain, the tax can carry potential economic consequences. By tightening household budgets and placing local small businesses at a competitive disadvantage, the measure risks compromising local priorities. Ultimately, this measure asks San Dimas to bear a disproportionate financial burden while diminishing the community‘s ability to fund its own essential services and infrastructure.

Furthermore, the proposed Act presents significant concerns regarding governance and local accountability. By relying on an allocation framework managed by County departments and thirdparty service providers, the measure increases the risk of excessive bureaucracy over direct service delivery. Unlike local municipal measures where City officials are directly accountable to residents for every dollar spent, countywide measures lack the transparency necessary to ensure that funds translate into local results. Of particular concern, staff was informed this measure is

Approve a Letter to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Opposing a Proposed Countywide Sales Tax Increase. Page 3
For the Meeting of February 10, 2026
being written as a general tax, requiring only a majority vote to pass. This would allow the County to redirect the funds toward other public services at their discretion.

Finally, staff was informed that the County is pursuing emergency State legislation to raise the existing sales tax ceiling. The continuous layering of countywide taxes via state-authorized exceptions severely constrains the City’s fiscal flexibility and risks creating long-term voter fatigue.

As the tax ceiling is approached through repeated regional measures that fail to demonstrate measurable community-level improvements, it becomes increasingly difficult for the City to pass its own local funding initiatives in the future.

For these reasons, staff recommends that the Council approve the attached letter of opposition.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council could choose not to send a letter, but this would mean potentially missing an opportunity to voice its concerns regarding the proposed countywide sales tax increase.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Travis Sais
Assistant City Manager
Attachments:

1. Letter of Opposition to L.A. County Board of Supervisors

Director of Administrative
Services
Michael O’Brien
Director of Community
Development
Luis Torrico
Director of Parks and
Recreation
Scott Wasserman
Director of Public Works
Shari Garwick
ATTACHMENT 1
245 East Bonita Avenue ∙ San Dimas ∙ California 91773-3002 ∙ (909) 394-6200 ∙ Fax (909) 394-6209  sandimasca.gov City Council
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
Eric Weber, Mayor Pro Tem - District 1
Rachel Bratakos – District 3
Eric Nakano – District 2
Ryan A. Vienna – District 4
City Manager
Brad McKinney
Assistant City Manager
Travis Sais
City Attorney
Jeff Malawy
February 10, 2026
Honorable Kathryn Barger
Chair, Los Angeles County Supervisors
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
SUBJECT: STRONG OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED CONUNTYWIDE SALES TAX INCREASE – HEALTHCARE FUNDING RESTORATION ACT
Dear Chair Barger and Members of the Board,
The City of San Dimas City Council submits this letter to formally oppose the proposed Healthcare Funding Restoration Act and its associated 0.50% countywide transactions and use tax.

While the City recognizes the financial pressures facing healthcare and public health systems in Los Angeles County, this proposal must be evaluated within the broader context of intergovernmental fiscal decisions that have systematically shifted resources away from local governments. For years, cities in Los Angeles County have weathered the cumulative impact of federal, state, and county actions that erode local revenue authority and redirect locally generated funds. These actions have forced cities to meet escalating service demands and absorb significant administrative obligations without commensurate funding. The proposed Act represents a continuation of this unsustainable trend, further comprising the fiscal health of cities.

The City’s experience with County measures, specifically Measure H and Measure A, validates these concerns. Between 2017-2025, San Dimas residents contributed over $15 million in Measure H funding, yet the City received a negligible $30,000 in return. This pattern persists with the recently adopted Measure A; while projected to generate over $4 million annually from our community, the City will receive less than $150,000 per year in direct local funding. Rather than benefiting the taxpayers who bear the financial burden, these revenues are diverted into County operations and poorly monitored non-profit providers. This systemic lack of transparency deprives the City of any meaningful ability to ensure these funds translate into tangible local results.

These experiences explain why cities throughout Los Angeles County and the State of California have increasingly been forced to consider local funding measures. Local measures ensure that tax revenue

Letter to Los Angeles County Board of Supervisor Kathryn Barger 2 February 10, 2026
245 East Bonita Avenue ∙ San Dimas ∙ California 91773-3002 ∙ (909) 394-6200 ∙ Fax (909) 394-6209  sandimasca.gov remains in the community where it is generated, is applied to locally identified priorities, and is overseen by elected officials directly accountable to the taxpayers. This accountability is not optional; it is fundamental. When revenues stay local, residents can verify the impact of their investment, and leaders can tailor services to the specific needs of the community.

By contrast, countywide sales tax measures dilute local benefits and erode transparency. While the proposed measure includes a prescriptive allocation framework, it relies heavily on County departments and intermediary entities, increasing the risk that additional revenue will expand administrative structures rather than deliver timely, direct services to communities. Beyond these structural concerns, a countywide tax carries immediate consequences for the San Dimas economy. Higher sales taxes tighten household budgets and place our small businesses at a competitive disadvantage. The proposed countywide measure also risks undermining local efforts like the Bonita Unified School District’s upcoming bond measure to modernize aging classrooms and facilities. Ultimately, these impacts would result in San Dimas residents and businesses bearing a disproportionate share of the tax burden without receiving corresponding benefits.

Furthermore, this proposal raises serious governance and fiscal policy concerns. The continuous layering of countywide taxes via state-authorized exceptions severely constrains local fiscal flexibility. This approach inevitably leads to voter fatigue, as residents are asked to fund repeated measures that fail to demonstrate measurable improvements at the community level.

For these reasons, the City of San Dimas opposes this proposal and is not prepared to engage in further discussions regarding its refinement or implementation. We maintain that funds raised within a city must remain within that city to benefit the residents who provide them. This measure fundamentally fails to meet that standard.

Accordingly, the City of San Dimas respectfully urges the County to refrain from advancing this proposal.

Sincerely,
_____________________
Emmett Badar
Mayor

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of February 10, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Michael O’Brien, Administrative Services Director Subject: Approve Budget Amendments and Receive and file the Mid-Year Budget Report
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
This report provides an overview of the City of San Dimas' financial position at the midpoint of the 2025-26 fiscal year. It includes an analysis of revenues and expenditures and requested budget amendments.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council:
• Approve Budget Appropriations as detailed in Attachment 1. • Receive and File the Mid-Year Report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The attached budget amendments reflect adjustments in both revenue and expenditure categories. Reduction adjustments have been made to salary costs due to vacancies throughout the year, as well as reductions in professional and contract services that will not be used within this fiscal year.

On the expenditure side, increases are required to cover several essential costs. The main cost increases have to do with the cost of water utilities. The City has seen significant increases in water costs that will require additional transfers into the landscape fund to support the funding deficit between the landscape parcel tax collections and the cost to manage the City’s landscape maintenance. Additionally, a budget amendment is necessary to cover the costs associated with a main line breakage that caused damage to the Via Verde park playground area and walkways.

Those cost increases are reflected in both the General and Landscape supply accounts. The net

Approve Budget Amendments and Receive and file the Mid-Year Report. Page 2 For the Meeting of February 10,2026
effect of these budget amendments is a projected savings of $333.00, which will be returned to the General Fund Balance.

Fund 73 Proposition C includes an amendment for $200,000 for repairs at the Foothill bridge to address water leakage issues identified during the last bridge inspection. Because these Proposition C funds will lapse if not spent this year, this is an ideal time to address the issue rather than allowing the funds to expire and be returned to the County.

BACKGROUND
At the close of the 2024-25 fiscal year, the City's General Fund unassigned fund balance had a surplus of $3,291,366, including carryovers. The City Council approved an additional $1,000,000 contribution to fund the PERS unfunded liability and an additional $1,000,000 transfer for infrastructure and new equipment. This leaves $1,291,366 to help cover any budgeted shortfalls predicted with the adoption of the 2025-2026 operating and capital improvement plan.

The mid-year review, based on actual revenues and expenditures from July through January, allows the City to assess whether the adopted budget aligns with financial trends, and determine if adjustments are necessary.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Revenue Analysis
By January, the City has received its primary property tax payment, redevelopment agency distributions, and a portion of transient occupancy tax (TOT), business license fees, and sales tax revenue. While most revenue sources are above projections, business license, fines and penalties, and recreation fees are lower than expected for this time of the fiscal year but could be made up as the end of the year approaches. Some revenue line items that are underperforming include storm water inspection permits, Animal Control and kids fun club revenues, which have driven actuals below expectations for fines/penalties and recreation fees.

At the mid-year point we have seen positive revenue results, particularly in the following accounts:
• Sales tax revenues are currently $236,860 above HDL projections for this time of the fiscal year. February’s returns which include December’s sales tax will be a good indication of how the year may end up.
• Construction activity has exceeded expectations, with permit revenue already at 76% of its total budget and plan review fees are at 93% of its adopted budget. • Use of money and property, which includes interest earnings and rental of buildings have so far exceeded expectations, but Fair Market Value (FMV) adjustments could affect this outcome positively or negatively depending on where interest rates end the year at.

The chart below illustrates where revenues stand against expected results at this point in the fiscal year.

Approve Budget Amendments and Receive and file the Mid-Year Report. Page 3 For the Meeting of February 10,2026
Expenditure Analysis
City departments are generally operating below budgeted expenditure levels. Savings have resulted from staff vacancies and lower than anticipated professional services and contract costs. Some expenditures will occur later in the fiscal year or be carried forward to the next budget cycle. The following chart illustrates where General Fund expenditures stand against expected costs as of the end of January 2026.
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Disposal Fees
Business License & Peg Fees
TOT
Permits
Fines & Penalties
Use of Money & Property
Plan Reviews
Recreation Fees
Recreation Center Fees
Expected Returns Actual
Expected vs. Actual Revenues F.Y. 2025-26
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
Administration Legal Public Safety Public Works Recreation Community Development
General
Services
Expected Expense Actual
Expected vs. Actual Expenditures F.Y. 2025-26

Approve Budget Amendments and Receive and file the Mid-Year Report. Page 4 For the Meeting of February 10,2026
As of January 2026, expenditures exceeded revenues by $1,531,182. However, year-end adjustments, including loan repayments, interest allocations, and fair market value adjustments, would decrease the unassigned fund balance by approximately $80,427, leaving a net reduction of $1,611,609.

The table below summarizes the General Fund and select reserve fund activity:

Description General Fund
New
Equipment
Reserve
Capital Asset
Reserve Total
Beginning Fund Balance $44,105,961 751,747 8,538,456 $53,396,164 Revenue $16,189,041 26,278 $1,600,000 $17,815,319
Expenditures ($17,720,223) ($3,465) ($1,387,227) $(19,110,915 Golf Course Loan
Repayment $251,659 $251,659
FMV Adjustment $183,316 $183,316
Interest Allocation ($515,402) $(515,402)
Change in Fund
Balance ($1,611,609) $22,813 $212,773 (1,376,023)
% Reserve vs.

Expenditures 125% 143%
A reduction in overall fund balance for the year is expected, especially once the PERS additional UAL payment is made in February and the transfer to the infrastructure and new equipment funds takes place later this year. Operationally we are ahead of where we were last fiscal year in terms of operational revenues and expenditures as of January 31.

Given the original budgeted deficit, carryovers, and approved use of reserves, a surplus at the end of the fiscal year appears very unlikely.

Special Funds Analysis
Due to the need to utilize lapsing funds, the majority of metro funds which include Proposition A, C, Measure M and R should see reductions upon project completion. Park funds 021, 022 and 023 should also see reductions as expenditures for projects are greater than collections from Quimby fees. However, these are planned reductions in fund balance and not the result of operational deficits.

Cash Flow Analysis
As of July 2025, the City's cash balance was $77.5 million. It reached a low of $74.4 million in November before recovering to $80 million in January, following the receipt of the first property tax installment.

Approve Budget Amendments and Receive and file the Mid-Year Report. Page 5 For the Meeting of February 10,2026
Key projects initiated or completed include:
• Replaced City Hall Roof and City Yard Trash Bay.
• Replaced the City Hall Boiler.
• Repaired Train Depot Roof.
• Pioneer Park Restroom Rehabilitation.
• Added security cameras at the Senior Center and Martin House, as well as upgraded our EOC equipment utilizing a public safety grant.
• Outfitted and placed into service 17 new vehicles and ordered 14 more. • Completed paving projects on Fifth Street, Gladstone, Iglesia, Belleview, Hallock, Payson, Smead and Cypress St.
• Completed streetlight replacement of red poles and wooden poles on San Dimas, Bonita, Walnut Ave. and Iglesia St.
• Repaved 5 alleys and refreshed all red curbs in the City. • Cleaned 600 catch basins and awarded a contract for catch basin trash filters. • Implemented downtown parking restrictions and permit parking program. • Charter Oak Wall replacement to begin February 15th.
• Entitled the development of 164 2-3 story townhomes, 17 of which will be affordable units sold to Moderate-Income households.
• Entitled the development of 37 detached two-story single-family homes, 7 of which will be affordable units; 5 sold to Low-Income households and 2 sold to Moderate-Income households.
• Amended the Single-Family Zoning Code to clarify the intent of certain sections and add language to sections where policies have been in place but never codified. • Adopted Objective Design Standards for Qualified multi-family housing and mixed-use developments to retain some local control over “By-Right” projects. • Easy Scheduler – Successfully implemented the Easy Scheduler, a mobile-friendly, 24/7 online inspection scheduling system. The system improves operational efficiency and reduces customer frustration by allowing customers to schedule multiple inspections per visit, provides real-time inspection availability, and provides a customer friendly approach to scheduling inspections.
77,538,674
75,977,986
76,831,086
76,036,640
74,373,751
76,472,632
80,045,841
72,000,000
73,000,000
74,000,000
75,000,000
76,000,000
77,000,000
78,000,000
79,000,000
80,000,000
81,000,000
July August September October November December January Cash Flow 2025-26

Approve Budget Amendments and Receive and file the Mid-Year Report. Page 6 For the Meeting of February 10,2026

ALTERNATIVES
• The City Council may elect to deny the attached budget amendments. • Request additional information before receiving and filing the report.

Respectfully submitted,
.

Michael O’Brien
Administrative Services Director
Attachments:

1. Listing of various budget amendments

2. PowerPoint Presentation

2025-26 2025-26 2025-26
ADOPTED Budget PROPOSED
Account Name Account Number BUDGET Amendment REVISED BUDGET Contract Legal Services 001.4170.020.000 425,000.00 (50,000.00) 375,000.00 Professional Litigation 001.4170.020.003 100,000.00 (25,000.00) 75,000.00 Sick Leave Bank 001.4150.430.000 40,000.00 (16,500.00) 23,500.00 Human Resources Manager 001.4150.101.008 152,500.00 (33,000.00) 119,500.00 Departmental Assistant 001.4308.101.018 66,500.00 (11,500.00) 55,000.00 Election Services 001.4120.020.001 150,000.00 (50,000.00) 100,000.00 Administrative Analyst 001.4120.102.006 77,750.00 (22,750.00) 55,000.00 Employee Training 001.4150.434.000 50,000.00 (10,000.00) 40,000.00 Property Insurance 001.4190.014.001 252,963.00 (16,000.00) 236,963.00 Audit Cost/Professional Services 001.4190.020.000 112,975.00 (19,975.00) 93,000.00 Unemployment Compensation 001.4190.200.016 10,000.00 (5,000.00) 5,000.00 Law Enforcement Technician 001.4210.020.009 129,505.00 (29,505.00) 100,000.00 Contract & General Maintenance 001.4411.023.000 81,936.00 (4,936.00) 77,000.00 T1 Internet/Wireless Cards 001.4190.020.034 58,340.00 7,500.00 65,840.00 Park Maint Spec Debt Supplies 001.4414.033.000 - 31,000.00 31,000.00 Transfer To 008 Landscape 001.5000.099.008 147,999.00 139,850.00 287,849.00 Technology Subscriptions & Lic 001.4190.035.001 459,975.00 1,025.00 461,000.00 Admin Speck Dept Supplies 001.4120.033.000 1,500.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 Annual Awards 001.4150.408.000 13,500.00 500.00 14,000.00 Contract City Prosecutor 001.4170.020.001 50,000.00 25,000.00 75,000.00 Collection Professional Service Fees 001.4190.020.003 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 General Srv Spec Dept Supply 001.4190.033.000 5,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 PERS Retirement Contribution 001.4190.200.002 2,445,000.00 15,000.00 2,460,000.00 LTD & Life Insurance 001.4190.200.018 31,000.00 9,000.00 40,000.00 Rental Program Pool Vehicle 001.4342.020.001 2,500.00 500.00 3,000.00 Facilities Overtime 001.4410.103.000 10,000.00 10,000.00 20,000.00 Water 001.4411.022.004 700.00 6,000.00 6,700.00
Sr. Ctr Spec. Dept. Supplies 001.4412.033.000 3,500.00 500.00 4,000.00 Parkways Water 001.4415.033.000 146,000.00 14,000.00 160,000.00 SP Maint of Equipment 001.4430.015.000 31,836.00 1,164.00 33,000.00 Transfer to 034 Housing 001.5000.099.034 107,805.00 13,204.00 121,009.00 SYC Canyon House Maint (water) 001.4410.023.922 6,190.00 1,700.00 7,890.00 Civic Center Maint. Equip 001.4411.015.000 55,877.00 (3,000.00) 52,877.00 SR Ctr Maint of Equip 001.4412.015.000 34,670.00 8,390.00 43,060.00 SP Maint of Equipment 001.4430.015.000 31,836.00 5,000.00 36,836.00 Total General Fund 5,293,357.00 (333.00) 5,293,024.00
Park Maint Spec Debt Supplies 008.4414.033.000 39,500.00 20,500.00 60,000.00 Water - Parks 008.4414.022.004 300,000.00 100,000.00 400,000.00 Water - Parkways/Trees 008.44185.022.004 29,650.00 19,350.00 49,000.00 Interest Exp Walker House 038.4120.500.030 40,704.00 7,000.00 47,704.00 Gas Walker House 003.4410.022.002 1,000.00 3,500.00 4,500.00 Water Walker House 003.4410.022.004 4,000.00 4,000.00 8,000.00 Golf Course Maint Buildng 053.4410.023.000 10,000.00 5,000.00 15,000.00 Golf Course Water 053.4410.023.000 255,000.00 200,000.00 455,000.00 Foothill Blvd/SD Wash Cont 073.4841.662.000 - 200,000.00 200,000.00 NPDES General 078.4341.024.001 23,782.00 9,218.00 33,000.00 Total Other Funds 703,636.00 568,568.00 1,272,204.00
Transfer in from 001 008.500.001 147,999.00 139,850.00 287,849.00 Total Other Funds - 147,999.00 139,850.00 287,849.00
Budget Amendment Requests
Revenue Appropriations
Expenditure Appropriations
ATTACHMENT 1

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

MID YEAR BUDGET REPORT
February 10, 2026

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
2024-2025 General Fund Year End Balances
Description 2025 Actuals - 2024 Actuals - 2025 Net
Carryovers
= Difference
Unassigned FB $22,168,637 $17,812,239 $1,065,032 $3,291,366 Assigned FB $13,236,592 $9,836,592 $0 $3,400,000
New Equipment FB $751,747 $929,412 $0 ($177,665)
Capital Asset
Replacement FB
$8,538,456 $7,695,743 480,329 $362,384
Non-Spendable FB $8,700,732 $8,700,732 $0 $0
Total Fund Balance $53,396,164 $44,974,718 $1,545,361 Page 78 – 87 $6,876,085

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
Year to Date Revenues Expected vs. Actuals
Property Tax Sales Tax Disposal
Fees
Business
License &
Peg Fees
TOT Permits Fines &
Penalties
Use of
Money &
Property
Plan Reviews Recreation
Fees
Recreation
Center Fees
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
Expected vs. Actual Revenues F.Y. 2025-26
Expected Returns Actual Page 79 – 87

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
Rates of return on investments
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 -

0.50 1.00

1.50 2.00

2.50 3.00

3.50 4.00

4.50 5.00

0.75 1.38

2.27 1.93

0.50 0.37

2.17 3.93

4.41 4.27
Historical LAIF Interest Rates

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
Year to Date Expenditures Expected vs. Actuals
Administration Legal Public Safety Public Works Recreation Community Development
General
Services
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
Expected vs. Actual Expenditures F.Y. 2025-26
Expected Expense Actual Page 81 – 87

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
Change in Fund Balance as of 1/31/2026
Description General Fund
New Equipment
Reserve
Capital Asset
Reserve Total
Beginning Fund Balance

$44,105,961

$751,747

$8,538,456 $53,396,164
Revenue

16,189,041 26,278

1,600,000.00 17,815,319
Expenditures

(17,720,223)

(3,465.00)

(1,387,227.00) (19,110,915)
Golf Course Payment

251,659 251,659
FMV Adjustment

183,316 183,316
Interest Allocation

(515,402) (515,402)
Change in Fund Balance

(1,611,609)

22,813.00

212,773.00 (1,376,023)
Mid Year Fund Balance

$42,494,352

$774,560

$8,751,229 $52,020,141
% Reserve vs. Expenditures 125% 143%

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
2025-26 Cash Flow Analysis
July August September October November December January 70,000,000
72,000,000
74,000,000
76,000,000
78,000,000
80,000,000
82,000,000
77,538,674
75,977,986
76,831,086
76,036,640
74,373,751
76,472,632
80,045,841
Cash Flow 2025-26

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
Major Projects Completed or Ongoing
• Replaced City Hall Roof and City Yard Trash Bay.
• Replaced the City Hall Boiler.
• Repaired Train Depot Roof.
• Pioneer Park Restroom Rehabilitation.
• Added security cameras at the Senior Center and Martin House as well as upgraded our EOC equipment utilizing a public safety grant.
• Outfit and placed into service 17 new vehicles and ordered 14 more. • Completed paving projects on Fifth Street, Gladstone, Iglesia, Belleview, Hallock, Payson, Smead and Cypress St.
• Completed street light replacement of red poles and wooden poles on San Dimas, Bonita, Walnut Ave. and Iglesia St.
• Repaved 5 alleys and refreshed all red curbs in the City. • Cleaned 600 catch basins and awarded contract for catch basin trash filters. • Implemented downtown parking restrictions and permit parking program. Page 84 – 87

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
Major Projects Completed or Ongoing Continued
• Entitled the development of 164 2-3 story townhomes, 17 of which will be affordable units sold to Moderate-Income households.
• Entitled the development of 37 detached two-story single family homes, 7 of which will be affordable units; 5 sold to Low-Income households and 2 sold to Moderate-Income households.
• Amended the Single-Family Zoning Code to clarify the intent of certain sections, and add language to sections where policies have been in place, but never codified. • Adopted Objective Design Standards for Qualified multi-family housing and  mixed-use developments to retain some local control over “By-Right” projects. • Easy Scheduler – Successfully implemented the Easy Scheduler, a mobile-friendly, 24/7 online inspection scheduling system.  The system improves operational efficiency and reduces customer frustration by allowing customers to schedule multiple inspections per visit, provides real-time inspection availability, and provides a customer friendly approach to scheduling inspections.

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
Council Recommendations
• Approve Budget Appropriations per the attached schedule. • Receive and File the Mid Year Report.

CITY OF SAN DIMAS