San Dimas City Council
September 22, 2026

CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY
MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 22, 2026 7:00 PM
SAN DIMAS COUNCIL CHAMBER
245 EAST BONITA AVENUE
A public agenda packet is available for review on the City’s website  www.sandimasca.gov or by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected].

Members of the public may participate remotely, using any of the following sources:

Join using the Zoom application on PC, Mac, iPad or Android (Video and Audio):
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82975888067?pwd=aL1klMe71aaZxVG5Wpo2IkCL0WCbah.1 Passcode: 951714
One­Tap with Mobile Phone (Audio Only):
+12133388477,,82975888067#,,,,*951714# US (Los Angeles) Join via Telephone (Audio Only):

Dial  (213) 338­8477
Meeting ID: 829 7588 8067
Passcode: 951714
Members of the public may observe the City Council meeting live on the City of San Dimas website at www.sandimasca.gov or on KWST Channel 3. To view from the website, select the Watch City Council Meetings blue button from the home page.
7:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Emmett Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Rachel Bratakos, Councilmember Eric Nakano, Councilmember Ryan A. Vienna, Councilmember Eric Weber CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE
REPORT ON ACTION TAKEN DURING CLOSED SESSION
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Members of the audience are invited to address the City Council on any item on this agenda or not on this agenda. Public comment will not be taken during each individual agenda item, except for public hearing items. Comments on public hearing items will be heard when that item is scheduled for discussion. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the legislative body is prohibited from engaging in discussion on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. However, your concerns may be referred to staff or set for discussion at a later date. Public comments will be taken in the following order: (1) in person(2)Zoomparticipants(3)telephonecallinEachspeakerwillbelimitedtospeakingoncefor

CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE
REPORT ON ACTION TAKEN DURING CLOSED SESSION
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Members of the audience are invited to address the City Council on any item on this agenda or not on this agenda. Public comment will not be taken during each individual agenda item, except for public hearing items. Comments on public hearing items will be heard when that item is scheduled for discussion. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the legislative body is prohibited from engaging in discussion on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. However, your concerns may be referred to staff or set for discussion at a later date. Public comments will be taken in the following order: (1) in person, (2) Zoom participants, (3) telephone call in. Each speaker will be limited to speaking once for up to (3) three minutes.)
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a member of the City Council requests separate discussion.) CC1. Adopt Resolution 2026­59, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for the Warrant Register of September 30, 2026 in the amount of $541,050.64.

CC2. Approve Minutes of the August 25, 2026 City Council Meeting and September 8, 2026 City Council Meeting
CC3. Receive and File the August 2026 Investment Report CC4. Approve a Position Upgrade Request for Assistant Engineer to Associate Engineer CC5. Adopt Ordinance 1340, Approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 26­04, to Amend Title 18­Zoning, Chapter 18.508 Specific Plan No. 6, to Conditionally Permit the Operation of New Vehicle Sales and Associated Accessory Uses, and Outdoor Storage in Association with an Approved Primary Use.

CC6. CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY –  Approve a Budget Appropriation of $106,260 from the General Fund and Approve, and Authorize the Executive Director to execute an Agreement with Psomas to Prepare a Remediation Work Plan for Remediation of the Property at 344 Bonita Avenue
CC7. Adopt Resolution Numbers 2026­60, 2026­61, 2026­62 Requesting Transfer of Miscellaneous Transfer Drain (M.T.D.) No. 1852, 1852­01, and 1852­02 to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for Operation and Maintenance
CC8. Approve Time Extension for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 84436 (VTTM 24­01), 720 N.

Oakway Avenue and an unaddressed parcel (APN: 8392­015­041) END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
RECOMMENDATION: Approve consent calendar with recommendations as presented in staff reports.

OTHER BUSINESS
OB1. Adopt Interim Urgency Ordinance 1341 of the City of San Dimas, Establishing a 45­Day Moratorium on the Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units on Lots Created or Developed Pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero), and Declaring the Urgency Thereof; Adopt Resolutiion 2026­63 to hibihblihiif

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
RECOMMENDATION: Approve consent calendar with recommendations as presented in staff reports.

OTHER BUSINESS
OB1. Adopt Interim Urgency Ordinance 1341 of the City of San Dimas, Establishing a 45­Day Moratorium on the Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units on Lots Created or Developed Pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero), and Declaring the Urgency Thereof; Adopt Resolutiion 2026­63 to Prohibit Such Uses by Resolution. This Item is Exempt from CEQA Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1.  Adopt the Interim Urgency Ordinance by a 4/5 vote through the adoption of Ordinance 1341 (Attachment 1).

2.  Adopt Resolution 2026­63 (Attachment 2), expressing the City Council’s desire to prohibit accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero).

OB2. Discussion of Private Property Maintenance Standards RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council receive and file.

OB3. Discussion and Review of Incident/Accident Report Process for Kids Fun Club Program RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that we continue our current policy of telling the parents at pick up if their child was involved in an incident and documenting that conversation on the incident report for record. We can also hand them a note, which would summarize only their child’s involvement in the incident.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Public comments will be taken in the following order: (1) in person, (2) Zoom participants, (3) telephone call in. Each speaker will be limited to speaking once for up to (3) three minutes. (Members of the Audience (Speakers are limited to (3) minutes or as may be determined by the Chair.) CITY REPORTS
CR1. City Manager
CR2. City Attorney
CR3. Members of the City Council
Councilmembers’ Report on Meetings Attended at the Expense of the Local Agency (Pursuant to AB 1234 – G.C. §53232.3(d)
City Council Requests for Future Items, Comments and Updates

ADJOURNMENT
Notice Regarding Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the ADA, if ditttiitiittilttthCitClk'Offi

CR3. Members of the City Council
Councilmembers’ Report on Meetings Attended at the Expense of the Local Agency (Pursuant to AB 1234 – G.C. §53232.3(d)
City Council Requests for Future Items, Comments and Updates

ADJOURNMENT
Notice Regarding Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the ADA, if you need assistance to participate in a city meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 394­6216. Early notification before the meeting you wish to attend will make it possible for the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102­35.104 ADA Title II].

Copies of documents distributed for the meeting are available in alternative formats upon request. Any writings or documents provided to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public review Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and on Fridays from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Administration Department and San Dimas Library. In addition, most documents are posted on the City's website at www.sandimasca.gov.

Posting Statement:  I declare under penalty of perjury that on September 18, 2026, I posted a true and correct copy of this agenda on the bulletin board in the Civic Center Plaza of City Hall at 245 E.

Bonita Ave., San Dimas Post Office 300 E. Bonita Ave., Von’s Via Verde Shopping Center 1160 Via Verde Ave., and on the City's website www.sandimasca.gov/agendas­minutes/as required by law.

September 18, 2026 Debra Black
Debra Black, City Clerk

HOW TO PARTICIPATE AND SUBMIT COMMENTS
In Person: Upon arrival, please locate and complete a speaker card. Provide the speaker card to the City Clerk and take a seat in the audience area. Your name will be called when it is your turn to speak.

How to Sign-On Remotely (computer or mobile device)
Click the Zoom link on the posted agenda or type in the zoom link address for this meeting
• Wait for host to admit you
• You are now in the meeting
On browser type Zoom.us and join the meeting
• Enter the webinar ID and join
• Enter the meeting passcode and join meeting
• Wait for host to admit you
• You are now in the meeting
Participation Instruction for Public Comment Period
For Computer and Mobile Device
• Mayor calls for public comment.
• Ready for Zoom Participants
• Click hand raise feature to speak.
• When you are called to speak – you will be promoted to panelist by host • Click Join as Panelist
• Your microphone and camera must be on at all times.
• Click on the mic to unmute yourself. The timer will then be set.

To Sign-In By Phone:
• Dial the number posted on the agenda
• Enter Meeting ID followed by #
• Enter participate ID followed by #
To Participate by Phone:
• Press *9 on your phone to request to speak
• Follow commands on phone to unmute (press *6)
• The timer will then be set.

RESOLUTION 2026-59

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS,

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 2026
WHEREAS, the following listed demands have been audited by the Director of Administrative Services; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services has certified as to the availability of funds for payment thereto; and
WHEREAS, the register of audited demands has been submitted to the City Council for approval.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby approve the Warrant Register of September 30, 2026 in the amount of $541,050.64.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of September 2026. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that Resolution 2026-59 was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 22nd, day of September 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR

AGENCY MEETING

AMENDED ACTION MINUTES
AUGUST 25, 2026, 7:00 PM

REGULAR MEETING
Call to Order: 7: 00 PM
Roll Call: Mayor Emmett Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Rachel Bratakos, Councilmember Ryan A.

Vienna, Councilmember Eric Weber

Absent: Councilmember Eric Nakano
Staff: City Manager Brad McKinney, Assistant City Manager Travis Sais, Director of Public Works Shari Garwick, Director of Administrative Services Michael O’Brien, Director of Community Development Luis Torrico, Director of Parks and Recreation Scott Wasserman, City Attorney Jeff Malawy, City Clerk Debra Black

CONSENT ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Adopt Resolution 2026-53, A Resolution
of the City Council of the City of San
Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for
the Warrant Register of August 28, 2026
in the amount of $463,457.47

2. Approve Minutes of the August 11, 2026
City Council and Successor Agency
Special Meeting and August 11, 2026 City
Council Meeting

3. Adopt Resolution 2026-54, Authorizing
Participation in the California Fixed
Income Trust (CalFIT), Open a Participant
Account, and Designate Authorized
Signers

4. Receive and File the July 2026
Investment Report

5. Award Construction Contract 2026-05
Sealcoat of Designated City Streets and
Parking Lots to Ben’s Asphalt LLC in the
Amount of $375,079.00. Approve a
Budget Appropriation of $114,000 to
Account Number 012.4841.554.008 which
Represents Funds Eligible to be Carried
Over from the Fiscal Year 2025-26
MOTION: Motion/seconded by
Councilmember Weber/ Councilmember
Vienna to approve the consent calendar.

Motion carried 4-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Vienna, Weber
No: None

Absent: Nakano
Abstain: None

Approve Minutes of the August 25, 2026 City Council Meeting Page 2 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Budget for a Total Budget of $264,000 in
Account 012. Approve Overall Project
Budget of $512,625 Including
Construction, Inspection and Contingency

6. Authorize the Purchase of One Vermeer
BC1500 Brush Chipper through the
Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing
Program in Accordance with City
Purchasing Rules with RDO Equipment
Company for a Total Amount of
$98,047.46 with a Contingency Amount of
$16,952.54 Including Outfitting.

7. Approve a Revised Contract Extension
with Nieves Landscape, Inc. for Contract
Landscape Maintenance Services in an
Amount for $604,282.50

8. Appropriation of $247,058.28 from Fund
73 Account number 073.4841.662.000
(Proposition C Funds) for maintenance of
Foothill Bridge over San Dimas Wash.

Authorize Maintenance Work Order
8738727 for Epoxy Crack injection on
bridge soffit with Los Angeles County
Public Works.

CITY REPORTS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
a. City Manager City Manager McKinney made the following announcements:
• The housing project across from San
Dimas High School is installing water
main lateral sewer lines that will
temporarily impact traffic on Covina
Blvd.
• Golden State Water is working on a
water main replacement project on
Bonita Avenue.
b. City Attorney City Attorney Malawy announced the City Council would be going into closed session
for discussion on real property located at 344
W. Bonita Ave. Additionally, Fred Galante
from the City Attorney’s Office would attend
the closed session as an agency negotiator.
c. Members of the City Council
Reports on Meetings Attended AB 1234
(G.C. §53232.3(d))
None.

CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR

FUTURE ITEMS

COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

Approve Minutes of the August 25, 2026 City Council Meeting Page 3 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Request by Councilmember Weber supported
by Councilmember Vienna for staff to seek a
coalition with other cities interested in
presenting a letter to Metro urging more be
done to collect fares along the A-line.

CLOSED SESSION ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL

PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 344 W. Bonita Avenue (APN:
8386-021-913).

Agency Negotiators: Brad McKinney,
Executive Director; Travis Sais, Assistant
Executive Director; Jeff Malawy, Agency
Attorney; Luis Torrico, Agency Staff.

Negotiating Parties: City of San Dimas
as Successor Agency to the former San
Dimas Redevelopment Agency; Pioneer
Square, LLC
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of
Payment.

Following the closed session, the City
Attorney made a public announcement as
follows: The Successor Agency held a closed
session regarding real property negotiations
as listed on the agenda. The Successor
Agency discussed the item and gave
direction to staff, but no reportable action was
taken. The session adjourned at 8:25 pm.

Adjourned: 7:50 PM
I, Debra Black, City Clerk attest that these draft minutes are accurate and reflective of the actions taken by the City Council.

The minutes represent actions taken during the meeting of the City Council. Complete Council Member discussion on Regular Session meeting items can be viewed in archived video recordings on the City’s YouTube Channel at https://www.youtube.com/@cityofsandimas6330.

Public submittals on items are retained in the administrative record and can be viewed in the City’s archived Records Center at sandimasca.gov/city_documents. ___________________________
Debra Black, MMC
City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

ACTION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 8, 2026, 7:00 PM

REGULAR MEETING

Present: Mayor Emmett Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Rachel Bratakos, Councilmember Eric Nakano, Councilmember Ryan A. Vienna, Councilmember Eric Weber
Staff: City Manager Brad McKinney, Assistant City Manager Travis Sais, Director of Public Works Shari Garwick, Director of Administrative Services Michael O’Brien, Director of Community Development Luis Torrico, City Attorney Jeff Malawy, City Clerk Debra Black, Recreation Manager Joseph Jones, Planning Manager Marco Espinoza, Senior Planner Anne Moore Call to Order: 7:00 PM

CONSENT ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Recognize Patriotism Week September
8- 14

2. Adopt Resolution 2026-55, A Resolution
of the City Council of the City of San
Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for
the Pre-paid Warrant Register of August
31, 2026, in the amount of $945,280.08
and Warrant Register of September 15,
2026 in the amount of $287,884.78.

3. Approve Minutes of the August 25, 2026
Study Session Meeting and the August
25, 2026 City Council Meeting

4. Deny Claim Chang v. City of San Dimas
CJP 3056918

5. Deny Claim Kelly v. City of San Dimas
CJP 3057378 JBV

6. Approve an Update to the City's Biennial
Conflict of Interest Code

7. Approve the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Capital Reserve Agreement for the Arrow
Highway Street Improvement Project

8. SUCCESSOR AGENCY - Approval to
Recognize the Outstanding Creative
Growth Loan from the General Fund to
the Former Redevelopment Agency as
Legitimate Loans to be Paid Back to the
General Fund
MOTION: Motion/seconded by
Councilmember Vienna/ Mayor Pro Tem
Bratakos to approve the consent calendar.

Motion carried 5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

Approve Minutes of the September 8, 2026 City Council Meeting Page 2 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Introduce Ordinance 1340, a Municipal
Code Text Amendment (MCTA 26-04),
Amending Title 18-Zoning, Chapter

18.508 Specific Plan No. 6 to
Conditionally Permit the Operation of New
Vehicle Sales and Associated Accessory
Uses, and Outdoor Storage in Association
with An Approved Primary Use, and
Approve a Conditional Use Permit (CUP
26-03) for the Operation of New Vehicle
Sales with Associated Accessory Uses
Located at 502 W. Covina Boulevard, and
Outdoor Storage of Vehicles on an
Unaddressed Parking Lot Identified as
APN: 8382-019-025, Located within
Specific Plan No. 6. This Item is
Categorically Exempt under the California
Environmental Quality Act, Title 14,
Section 6, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section
15301 Existing Facilities Class 1
No public comments were received.

Applicant, Brendon Williams, provided
information on the project and answered
Council questions.

MOTION: Motion/seconded by
Councilmember Weber/ Councilmember
Vienna to introduce Ordinance 1340 and
adopt Resolution 2026-58. Motion carried 5-

0. Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

OTHER BUSINESS ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Appointment of City Commissioners MOTION: Motion/seconded by Councilmember Weber/ Councilmember
Vienna to reappoint commissioners in District
1 and 3. Motion carried 5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
AMENDED MOTION: Motion/seconded by
Councilmember Vienna/ Councilmember
Weber to reappoint the Parks and Recreation
Youth Commissioner and advertise for the
commission vacancies. Motion carried 5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

CITY REPORTS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
a. City Manager City Manager McKinney made the following announcements:
• Thanked the community for their
patience with Golden State Water’s

Approve Minutes of the September 8, 2026 City Council Meeting Page 3 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
water main replacement project on
Bonita Avenue.
• National Preparedness Month social
media campaign has begun. The first
post reminds the community to create
or update their emergency kits.
• Support the City of San Dimas v. City
of San Claremont softball game at
7:00 pm at Joat Park.
b. City Attorney None.
c. Members of the City Council
Reports on Meetings Attended AB 1234
(G.C. §53232.3(d))
None.

CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR

FUTURE ITEMS

COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
None.

The meeting was adjourned at 8:08 PM in memory of Gabe Hannah.

I, Debra Black, City Clerk attest that these draft minutes are accurate and reflective of the actions taken by the City Council.

The minutes represent actions taken during the meeting of the City Council. Complete Council Member discussion on Regular Session meeting items can be viewed in archived video recordings on the City’s YouTube Channel at https://www.youtube.com/@cityofsandimas6330.

Public submittals on items are retained in the administrative record and can be viewed in the City’s archived Records Center at sandimasca.gov/city_documents. ___________________________
Debra Black, MMC
City Clerk

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
From: Brad Mckinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Michael O'Brien, Director of Administrative Services Subject: Receive and File the August 2026 Investment Report ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Monthly Reporting for the City of San Dimas investment of idle funds and cash condition.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
• Receive and file the Investment and Cash Condition report for the month of August 2026.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Government Code Section 53646, the City Treasurer is required to provide a monthly investment report to the City Council.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
It is the policy of the City of San Dimas to invest public funds in a manner that will provide an optimal combination of security and investment return while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all State and local statutes governing the investment of public funds.

Receive and File the August 2026 Investment Report Page 2 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
The priority objectives of the City’s investment activities are as follows: safety, liquidity and returns.

The City’s investment portfolio as of August 31, 2026, maintained liquid cash in the amount of $14,391,626.31 held between BMO Harris, the City and LAIF and the CALTRUST Liquidity Fund.

This amounts to just under 18% of the portfolio to provide the cash flow necessary for City payroll and operating expenditures as well as large capital project expenses and unforeseen emergencies that may occur throughout the year. The following chart displays the total investments and weighted average yield per investment category:

The City’s Banking Services Provider BMO Harris provides a fully collateralized checking account whose funds are used to make cash payments for City payroll and operational expenses. The City performs daily bank reconciliations to ensure adequate cash is held in the checking account for upcoming expenditures. Cash held in the account earns income credits that accumulate at a rate of .75% which offsets banking service charges that are charged each quarter to the City. As of June 10, 2024, the City opened a collateralized money market account BMO Harris.

In accordance with the LA County Safe Water Program Guidelines, a separate money market account was opened in March 2026 to ensure that funds from this program are maintained in a segregated, interest-bearing account.

Petty Cash is held at City facilities for cashiering purposes and to reimburse small dollar expenditures between $0.01 and $50.00.

The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is considered a Local Agency Investment Pool and acts much like a money market account. Funds can be deposited and withdrawn without penalty.

The pool invests funds in short-term securities and can produce returns at rates like money markets but is considered more secure.

Receive and File the August 2026 Investment Report Page 3 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
CALTRUST is a public agency that provides investment funds that are liquid, short term, and medium term. The assets held by CALTRUST are managed by State Street Global Advisors.

Since the City first invested with CALTRUST in August of 2010, buying into the Medium-Term Fund. The City has made various contributions throughout the years as well as reinvested any accumulated interest earnings throughout the life of the fund.

In total the weighted average cost of investing in CALTRUST is $9.99. Currently due to increasing interest rates driving market rates down for assets already held, the share price of the fund as of August 31, 2026 was $9.76. Until interest rates decline to the point that share price would increase to $9.99 or above, the City would be recognizing a loss on sale. However, the City could pull out funds at any time if liquidity needs arose.

The City Treasurer also utilizes Brokers to purchase investment securities such as Government Sponsored Enterprises (Agency Bonds), Corporate Bonds, U.S. Treasuries and Negotiable CD’s.

As investments get purchased a broker money marker will be used for the transition time between investments maturing and becoming available cash for reinvestments.

The investment policy and California Government Code Section 53600.3 allows the City to invest 30% of its portfolio in Certificates of Deposit and 30% of its portfolio in Corporate Bonds through Brokers. U.S. Treasuries and Government Sponsored Enterprises (Agency Bonds) have no investment limits.

The following is a breakdown of the total invested in each type of investment along with its percentage of the portfolio:

Additionally, per the Investment Policy, the City has an established maturity matrix with the investment ranges as follows:

Maturity Range Guideline Portfolio Percentage
The City’s current investment maturity range is as follows:

INVESTMENTS BY MATURITY
Maturity Range Amount % of Portfolio
1 Day to 1 Yr. $ 39,649,461.55 49%
1 Yr. to 3 Yrs. $ 14,293,259.95 17%
3 Yrs. to 5 Yrs. $ 27,759,958.92 34%

Receive and File the August 2026 Investment Report Page 4 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Total $ 81,702,680.42 100%
The weighted average maturity for all City investments is 1.63 years, short term investments with maturity within six months continues to draw higher yields; however, longer-term yields have been increasing making investing in longer term assets more appealing.

Specific details pertaining to the City’s investment names, CUSIP #’s, coupon and purchase yields, maturity dates, par and book values are included in the Investment and Cash Condition Report attachment.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Michael O'Brien
Director of Administrative Services
Attachments:

1. Investment and Cash Condition Report

2. Investment Authorization Form

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

MONTHLY CASH BALANCE INVESTMENT REPORT
AUGUST 2026

ENDING BALANCE
$1,104,626.92
$919,014.22
$1,861,571.24
$1,240.00
$9,452,271.75
$1,052,902.18
$15,205,551.98
$0.00
CUSIP # COUPON
YIELD

PURCHASE

YIELD MATURITY PAR VALUE BOOK VALUE
CHEVRON - 3 YEAR BOND 166756ALO 1.02% 4.75% 8/12/2027 $250,000.00 $222,444.51 YUCAIPA VY CALIF WATER DISTRICT 98840BBD4 2.29% 4.72% 9/1/2027 $250,000.00 $232,227.50 ONTARIO CALIFORNIA PUB - 3 YEAR BOND 68304RCD0 1.81% 4.52% 10/1/2027 $255,000.00 $232,539.60 UNITED HEALTH GROUP - 4 YEAR BOND 91324PDK5 3.85% 4.73% 6/15/2028 $250,000.00 $241,935.46 CALIFORNIA ST UNIV REV SYSTEMWIDE- 4 YEAR BOND 13077DQG0 3.85% 4.70% 6/15/2028 $310,000.00 $270,924.50 SOLANO CALIF COMMUNITY COLLEGE - 4 YEAR BOND 83412PHB1 1.48% 4.50% 8/1/2028 $350,000.00 $308,661.50 ADVOCATE HEALTH & HOSPS CORP 007589AA2 3.83% 4.64% 8/15/2028 $305,000.00 $296,779.55 CALIFORNIA ST DEPT WATER - 4 YEAR BOND 13067WRF1 1.32% 4.70% 12/1/2028 $250,000.00 $215,147.50 CALIFORNIA ST DEPT WTR - 3 YEAR BOND 13067WRF1 1.32% 4.28% 12/1/2028 $330,000.00 $297,851.40 ATHENE GLOBAL FDG - 5 YEAR BOND 04685A3G4 2.71% 4.43% 1/7/2029 $350,000.00 $326,841.60 METLIFE GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 59217GFR5 4.85% 4.90% 1/8/2029 $250,000.00 $249,451.14 TOYOTA MTR CORP 89236TFT7 3.65% 4.20% 1/9/2029 $300,000.00 $293,442.80 NORTHWESTERN MUT GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 66815L2Q1 4.71% 5.16% 1/10/2029 $250,000.00 $245,327.02 RGA GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 76209PAB9 2.70% 4.50% 1/18/2029 $300,000.00 $278,689.63 NY LIFE GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 64952WFF5 4.70% 4.76% 1/29/2029 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 MASS MUTUAL GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 57629W4T4 5.15% 5.15% 5/30/2029 $250,000.00 $249,998.23 BMW US CAP LLC - 4.5 YEAR BOND 05565ECR4 4.65% 5.00% 8/13/2029 $300,000.00 $295,721.23 MERCEDES BENZ - 4.85 YEAR BOND 233851DW1 3.10% 4.64% 8/15/2029 $350,000.00 $327,541.16 ASCENSION TAXABLE - 4.5 YEAR BOND 04352EAA3 4.45% 4.45% 8/15/2029 $350,000.00 $322,849.13 PACIFIC LIFE GLOBAL - 4.5 YEAR BOND 6944PL3C1 4.50% 4.65% 8/28/2029 $250,000.00 $248,463.27 MUTUAL OF OMAHA - 5 YEAR BOND 62829D2E9 4.75% 4.75% 10/15/2029 $250,000.00 $249,997.05 PRICOA GLOBAL FUNDING - 5 YEAR BOND 74153WCW7 4.70% 4.40% 10/15/2029 $325,000.00 $325,000.00 AIG GLOBAL - 4.43 YEAR BOND 00138CBC1 4.90% 4.90% 12/3/2029 $350,000.00 $348,496.02 PROTECTIVE LIFE GLOBAL - 4.8 YEAR BOND 74368CCA0 4.77% 4.91% 12/9/2029 $350,000.00 $347,908.68 SAN BUENAVENTURA CALIFORNIA WATER - 4.5 YEAR BOND 797055DQ0 4.37% 4.37% 1/1/2030 $305,000.00 $271,553.70 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP BOND - 4 YEAR BOND 22160KAP0 1.60% 3.91% 4/20/2030 $575,000.00 $523,471.91 WESTERN - SOUTHERN GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 95954A2A0 4.50% 4.90% 5/1/2030 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 TEXAS INSTRUMENT - 4 YEAR BOND 3882508BJ2 1.75% 3.85% 5/4/2030 $350,000.00 $319,810.19 GUARDIAN LIFE CORP BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 40139LBN2 4.33% 4.10% 5/15/2030 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - 5 YEAR BOND 91412HJR5 4.43% 4.43% 5/15/2030 $500,000.00 $444,445.00 MET TOWER CORP BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 58989V2L7 4.05% 4.05% 10/6/2030 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 MASS MUTUAL GLOBAL - 4 YEAR BOND 57629WCW8 1.55% 4.16% 10/9/2030 $350,000.00 $310,923.60 META PLATFORMS 5YR 4.10% 30303MA88 4.10% 4.10% 11/15/2030 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 PRICOA GLOBAL FUNDING - 5 YEAR BOND 74153WCZ0 4.35% 4.13% 11/25/2030 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 BANNER HEALTH - 4.5 YEAR BOND 06654DAD9 1.98% 4.50% 1/1/2031 $350,000.00 $312,804.67 PACIFIC LIFE GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 6944PL3M9 4.38% 4.01% 2/3/2031 $350,000.00 $355,014.61 AMAZON COM INC - 5 YEAR BOND 023135DD5 4.25% 4.25% 3/13/2031 $350,000.00 $349,997.09 FNMA POOL GTD MTG PASS - 5 YEAR BOND 3140Q2QM3 3.95% 4.13% 4/1/2031 $500,000.00 $496,701.11 FNMA GTD PASS THRU - 5 YEAR BOND 3140Q2ZSO 4.36% 4.40% 5/1/2031 $500,000.00 $499,961.38 FNMA GTD PASS THRU - 5 YEAR BOND 3140Q26C7 4.45% 3.94% 6/1/2031 $500,000.00 $489,490.49 $13,002,412.23

SUMMARY OF BANK BALANCES YIELD

0.75%

3.84%

BMO HARRIS - GENERAL ACCOUNT

SAN DIMAS PETTY CASH - IMPREST FUNDS

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) CA STATE TREASURER

3.16%

3.00%

BMO HARRIS - MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT

BMO HARRIS - MEASURE W - MONEY MARKET

INVESTMENTS

3.88%

CALTRUST LIQUIDITY FUND
GREAT PACIFIC SECURITIES CORPORATE & MUNICIPAL BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

3.79%
INVESTMENTS HELD WITH GREAT PACIFIC SECURITIES:

PRINCIPAL IN BROKER MONEY MARKET

CALTRUST INVESTMENT PROGRAM-MEDIUM TERM
ATTACHMENT 1

GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP - 5 YEAR BOND 38150AJ63 1.70% 1.70% 10/29/2026 $210,000.00 $210,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY FIN GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 61766YGT2 1.35% 1.35% 11/18/2026 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 JP MORGAN CHASE BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 48128G5Y2 2.10% 2.10% 1/29/2027 $270,000.00 $270,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA - 5 YEAR BOND 06048WS84 2.75% 2.75% 3/2/2027 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY-FIN GLOBAL 5 YEAR BOND 61766YJQ5 3.25% 3.25% 4/13/2027 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 INTEL CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 458140BY5 3.75% 4.25% 8/5/2027 $250,000.00 $244,538.75 WELLS FARGO - 4 YEAR BOND 95001DL99 4.50% 4.50% 8/4/2029 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 NVIDIA CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 67066GAR5 4.50% 4.62% 6/15/2031 $250,000.00 $249,000.00 $1,973,538.75
MARINE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 2 YEAR CD 56824JBD54 4.20% 4.20% 11/27/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA NEW YORK - 5 YEAR CD 38149M4T7 2.65% 2.65% 4/13/2027 $246,000.00 $246,000.00 STATE BANK OF INDIA - 5 YEAR CD 856285N64 3.30% 3.30% 6/1/2027 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 BRIDGEWATER BANK - 4 YEAR CD 108622QG94 3.90% 3.90% 10/30/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 FIRST GTY BK HAMMOND - 5 YEAR CD 320437BF2 4.05% 4.05% 11/29/2030 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 SALLIE MAE - 5 YEAR CD 795451FK4 4.45% 4.45% 8/19/2031 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 $1,478,000.00
13063EGT7 4.50% 4.32% 8/1/2029 $275,000.00 $277,068.00
CALIFORNIA STATE MUNICIPAL BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 13063ETP1 4.05% 3.92% 4/1/2031 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $577,068.00
3133ERL41 4.13% 4.40% 12/17/2029 $517,000.00 $510,703.46 3130B7SM77 3.75% 3.77% 9/23/2030 $500,000.00 $499,525.00 CALIFORNIA STATE MUNICIPAL BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 13063ETP1 4.05% 3.96% 4/1/2031 $290,000.00 $290,000.00 $1,300,228.46
3133ENSZ4 2.75% 2.75% 4/1/2027 $250,000.00 $250,000.00
16863LAB1 3.50% 3.50% 7/29/2027 $175,000.00 $173,950.00 3140LBSE4 1.09% 4.38% 3/1/2028 $350,000.00 $306,250.00
FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140NUUA5 4.52% 4.52% 3/1/2029 $500,000.00 $499,062.50 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 3.9 YEAR BOND 3140LFKC7 2.11% 4.20% 3/1/2029 $365,000.00 $337,739.06 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XDBP7 4.15% 4.61% 4/1/2029 $400,000.00 $390,902.40 MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST CO - 3 YEAR BOND 564759UF3 4.25% 4.25% 6/22/2029 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XKSV0 3.81% 3.81% 7/1/2029 $400,000.00 $387,000.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 314HU7G5 2.74% 4.06% 8/1/2029 $500,000.00 $472,031.25 FEDL HOMELOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XKTE7 4.02% 4.49% 8/1/2029 $505,000.00 $495,846.88 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 4.8 YEAR BOND 3140HVJ62 2.61% 4.60% 9/1/2029 $390,000.00 $357,946.88 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XFSR0 4.42% 4.71% 9/1/2029 $500,000.00 $494,687.50 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 340NWFK6 4.01% 4.37% 10/1/2029 $500,000.00 $492,656.25 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 4 YEAR BOND 3140HWK50 2.67% 3.84% 11/1/2029 $500,000.00 $479,687.50 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140NXC50 4.56% 4.76% 1/1/2030 $500,000.00 $496,562.50 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK BOND - 4.75 YEAR BOND 3132XFVC9 4.00% 4.00% 1/1/2030 $325,000.00 $321,140.63 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP- 4.75 YEAR BOND 3132XFWC8 4.31% 4.31% 2/1/2030 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 4.9 YEAR BOND 3132ZKYX9 4.15% 4.15% 3/1/2030 $500,000.00 $498,906.25 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 4.9 YEAR BOND 3132XFWA2 3.75% 3.75% 3/1/2030 $500,000.00 $489,375.00 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP- 4.8 YEAR BOND 313XFWS3 4.17% 4.12% 4/1/2030 $340,000.00 $339,681.25 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 314ONYPF2 4.25% 4.25% 6/1/2030 $500,000.00 $498,281.25 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140NYQL8 4.15% 4.15% 6/1/2030 $500,000.00 $498,125.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140NYXE6 4.24% 4.24% 7/1/2030 $500,000.00 $499,375.00 FNMA BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 3140J0JC5 1.25% 4.07% 7/1/2030 $550,000.00 $481,250.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140Q0A77 4.14% 4.14% 8/1/2030 $300,000.00 $299,812.50 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XHS47 3.25% 3.92% 9/1/2030 $500,000.00 $482,880.83 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3136GASX8 3.75% 3.75% 9/18/2030 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140Q1PP9 3.93% 4.05% 12/1/2030 $275,000.00 $273,882.81 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140Q1DA5 3.99% 4.06% 12/1/2030 $1,000,000.00 $998,125.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN 5 YEAR BOND 3140Q1ZC7 4.03% 4.03% 1/1/2031 $500,000.00 $499,843.75 3140Q2EP9 3.77% 3.84% 2/1/2031 $500,000.00 $499,062.50
3140LBJ46 1.38% 4.01% 3/27/2031 $500,000.00 $440,937.50 FNMA POOL GTD MTG PASS - 5 YEAR BOND 3140Q2QM3 3.95% 4.22% 4/1/2031 $500,000.00 $494,687.50 FNMA NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 314Q25W4 4.18% 4.33% 6/1/2031 $500,000.00 $497,500.00 BANK OF AMERICA - 5 YEAR BOND 06428KAX4 5.00% 5.00% 8/11/2031 $246,000.00 $246,000.00 STIFEL GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ENTERPRISES (GSE) AGENCY BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL: $15,237,189.49 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN- 5 YEAR BOND
FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR DUS BOND
FEDL FARM CREDIT BANK BOND - 5 YEAR BOND
CHIEF FINANCIAL FED CR UN - 2 YEAR BOND
FEDL NATL MTG ASSN- 5 YEAR BOND
TVI CD'S INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL :

TVI MUNICIPAL BONDS SUBTOTAL :

TVI GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ENTERPRISES (GSE) AGENCY BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS SYSTEMWIDE - 5 YEAR BOND
CALIFORNIA STATE - 5 YEAR BOND
FEDL HOME LOAN - 5 YEAR BOND
TVI CORPORATE BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

INVESTMENTS HELD WITH TVI:

BANK OF AMERICA - 5 YEAR BOND 06048WP20 1.25% 1.25% 9/24/2026 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 APPLE INC - 10 YEAR CORPORATE BOND 037833CR9 3.20% 3.30% 5/11/2027 $250,000.00 $248,850.00 SADDLEBACK VALLEY - 7.75 YEAR BOND (MUNICIPAL BOND) 786318LF0 2.40% 3.41% 8/1/2027 $250,000.00 $238,500.00 SANTA CLARA VALLEY CA WATER DISTRICT - 5 YEAR MUNICIPAL BOND 80168FPB6 1.53% 4.00% 6/1/2029 $170,000.00 $157,821.20 AMAZON - 5 YEAR CORPORATE BOND 023135DD5 4.25% 4.25% 3/13/2031 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $1,395,171.20
FIRST STATE BANK - 4 YEAR CD 33650TAH3 3.60% 3.60% 9/16/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 QUORUM FED CR - 4 YEAR CD 74909LAB6 3.85% 3.85% 9/23/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 PENTAGON FEDERAL CR UN - 5 YEAR CD CUSIP #70962LAS1 70962LAS1 0.90% 0.90% 9/29/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ONPATH FEDERAL CREDIT UN - 4 YEAR CD 68283MAF3 3.25% 3.25% 9/30/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 HAWAII CENTRAL FCU - 3 YEAR CD 419700AG4 5.50% 5.50% 10/27/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 BANK UNITED NA - 5 YEAR CD 066519RW1 1.35% 1.35% 12/8/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 BANK HAPOALIM BM - 5 YEAR CD 06251A3K4 1.35% 1.35% 12/16/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 CONNEXUS CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 20825WAR1 1.25% 1.25% 12/23/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 AMERANT BANK - 5 YEAR CD 02357QAQ0 1.60% 1.60% 2/16/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 PIMA CREDIT UNION- 4.5 YEAR CD 722000AA4 5.15% 5.15% 2/17/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 METRO CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 59161YAP1 1.70% 1.70% 2/18/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BEAL BANK PLANO TEXAS - 5 YEAR CD 07371AZQ9 2.05% 2.05% 3/3/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 BEAL BANK USA LAS VEGAS - 5 YEAR CD 07371CK81 2.05% 2.05% 3/3/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 SPOKANE TEACHERS CR 849061AF3 4.75% 4.75% 3/25/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY- 5 YEAR CD 61773TDN0 3.00% 3.00% 4/29/2027 $246,000.00 $246,000.00 GENERATION BANK ROGERS AR CD - 5 YEAR CD 37149CAV9 3.10% 3.10% 5/6/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE - 5 YEAR CD 24951TAT2 3.25% 3.25% 5/13/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 RADIFI FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 2 YEAR CD 75034WAA9 4.00% 4.00% 5/13/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CALDWELL BT CO - 2 YEAR CD 128829AQ1 4.00% 4.00% 6/30/2027 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 TRUSTONE FINL CR UN - 5 YEAR CD 89841MAF4 3.40% 3.40% 7/19/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BMO HARRIS BANK - 5 YEAR CD 05600XHE3 3.55% 3.55% 7/27/2027 $247,000.00 $247,000.00 THIRD FEDL S&L ASSN - 5 YEAR CD 88413QDM7 3.40% 3.40% 7/27/2027 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 CMNTY COMMERCE BANK CLAREMONT- 5 YEAR CD 20367GBH1 3.30% 3.30% 8/10/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ST VINCENT MED CTR CR - 5 YEAR CD 85279AAA0 3.50% 3.50% 8/12/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 PITTSBURG CITY HALL FCU - 5 YEAR CD 72500MAA3 3.60% 3.60% 8/16/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SHARONVIEW FCU - 5 YEAR CD 819866BL7 3.50% 3.50% 8/16/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 GHS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 36266LAA4 3.80% 3.80% 9/15/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 OKLAHOMA EDUCATORS CR - 2 YEAR CD 67885MAE0 3.65% 3.65% 10/4/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 VALLEY NAT BANK - 2.5 YEAR CD 919853QW4 4.20% 4.20% 12/23/2027 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 SOUTHPOINT BANK - 3 YEAR CD 84464PCC9 4.00% 4.00% 4/28/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SOUND CREDIT UNION - 4 YEAR CD 83616HAH7 4.15% 4.15% 6/2/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 MEDALLION BANK - 3 YEAR CD 58404DXY2 4.10% 4.10% 6/30/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ALLY BANK - 2 YEAR CD 02007QDJ7 4.20% 4.20% 7/10/2028 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 NEW ORLEANS FIREMANS FCU - 5 YEAR CD 647608AH1 5.00% 5.00% 7/17/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 NUMERICA CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 67054NBK8 5.10% 5.10% 7/31/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 ROCKLAND FEDL CR UNION - 2 YEAR CD 77357DAS7 4.40% 4.40% 7/31/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SOUTHWEST FINAL FED - 3 YEAR CD 84485EAN7 4.00% 4.00% 8/15/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 GREEN STATE CREDIT UNION- 5 YEAR CD 39573LEL8 5.00% 5.00% 8/29/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 LIVE OAK BANKING - 2.5 YEAR CD 538037BC5 3.70% 3.70% 9/13/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 RIA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 3 YEAR CD 749622BX3 4.00% 4.00% 10/13/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CIVIC FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 3.25 YEAR CD 178808AB7 4.10% 4.10% 10/23/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ALLIANT CREDIT UNION- 5 YEAR CD 01882MAH5 5.35% 5.35% 11/15/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 SAN FRANCISCO FEDL CR UNION - 4 YEAR CD 79772FAL0 4.25% 4.25% 11/27/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SKYLA FEDL CREDIT UNION - 3.5 YEAR CD 83086XAE0 4.10% 4.10% 11/30/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 MAINE SAVINGS - 3.5 YEAR CD 560507AU9 4.00% 4.00% 1/30/2029 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 OPTUM BANK - 4 YEAR CD 68405VDC0 4.00% 4.00% 4/30/2029 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 TRUIST BANK - 5 YEAR CD 897926BG5 4.45% 4.45% 4/30/2029 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY PVT - 5 YEAR CD 61776NRX3 4.15% 4.15% 5/7/2029 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 BMW BANK OF NORTH AMERICA - 4 YEAR CD 05612LER9 4.00% 4.00% 5/9/2029 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 EAGLEMARK SVGS BANK - 3 YEAR CD 27004PJN4 4.30% 4.30% 7/20/2029 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 TEXAS EXCHABGE BANK - 4 YEAR CD 88241TWS5 3.60% 3.60% 10/5/2029 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 AMOCO Federal Credit Union 31424AAM2 4.00% 4.00% 12/17/2029 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CANADAIGUA NATL B & T - 4 YEAR CD 137141BJ5 3.95% 3.95% 1/18/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 PARKSIDE FINANCIAL B & T 4 YEAR CD 70147AGT5 3.90% 3.90% 1/28/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK - 5 YEAR CD 46657VWH9 4.75% 4.75% 1/31/2030 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 STIFEL CORPORATE & MUNICIPAL BONDS SUBTOTAL:

FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK- 4 YEAR CD Callable 307811MZ9 3.90% 3.90% 2/11/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK - 5 YEAR CD 02589AGX4 4.15% 4.15% 3/26/2030 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 A+ FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 00224TAS5 4.15% 4.15% 3/28/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 MERRICK BANK - 4 YEAR CD 59013LKY9 4.05% 4.05% 4/9/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CITIBANK SIOUX BANK - 5 YEAR CD 17290GCM7 4.25% 4.25% 7/21/2030 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 CREDIT HUMAN FED CR UN - 5 YEAR CD 22537MAJ6 3.65% 3.65% 9/30/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 FIRST FEDL BANK - 5 YEAR CD 32022WEF9 3.75% 3.75% 10/17/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 HOLYOKE CR - 5 YEAR CD 43666MAD8 3.95% 3.95% 11/5/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BNY MELLON - 5 YEAR CD 05614FCH4 3.65% 3.65% 11/19/2030 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 FIRST ALLIANCE CR UN - 5 YEAR CD 33556AAC0 3.95% 3.95% 3/27/2031 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 USF FEDL CREDIT UNION- 5 YEAR CD 90353ECY7 4.30% 4.30% 5/29/2031 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 VERITY CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 92349MAA6 4.40% 4.40% 6/4/2031 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ALPHABET INC SR BOND - 5 YEAR CD 02079KCQ8 4.87% 4.87% 8/15/2031 $530,000.00 $529,894.00 $17,141,894.00
$52,105,502.13
$81,702,680.42
Amount % of Portfolio Amount % of Portfolio
$3,886,452.38 5% 39,649,461.55 $ 49%
$9,452,271.75 12% 14,293,259.95 $ 17%
$16,258,454.16 20% 27,759,958.92 $ 34%
$16,537,417.95 20% $ 81,702,680.42 100%
$16,948,190.18 21%
$18,619,894.00 23% 3.70%
$81,702,680.42 100% 1.63
Michael O'Brien Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Prepared by: Jennifer Legaspi
The above investments have met the requirements as stated in the City's Annual Investment Policy.

CALTRUST

GSE AGENCY BONDS

CORPORATE & MUNICIPAL BONDS

NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS Weighted Average Maturity in Years Weighted Average Yield
3 Yrs. to 5 Yrs.

Total

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)

INVESTMENTS BY TYPE INVESTMENTS BY MATURITY

CHECKING & MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS/CASH ON HAND/ CASH

HELD FOR INVESTMENT
Maturity Range
1 Day to 1 Yr.
1 Yr. to 3 Yrs.

Type
TOTAL CD's/GSE BONDS/ CORPORATE BONDS/TREASURY BILLS

TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS
STIFEL CD'S INVESTMENT SUBTOTAL:

ATTACHMENT 2

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Cindy Balderas, Human Resources Manager
Subject: Approve a Position Upgrade Request for Assistant Engineer to Associate Engineer
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The Public Works Department requested to upgrade the Assistant Engineer position to Associate Engineer to address the increased complexity, responsibility, and level of independent project management required within the Engineering Division.

The City's engineering workload has materially changed in recent years. The Division is managing a significant increase in federally funded capital projects, major private development, and regulatory and public information responsibilities. These changes require greater independent engineering and project management capacity than was previously necessary.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council:
• Approve the request to upgrade the vacant position of Assistant Engineer to Associate Engineer.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
The annual base salary range for the Assistant Engineer classification is $94,066 –$114,337, compared with $106,888-$129,923 per year for the Associate Engineer classification. Based on a comparison of the maximum salary for each classification, the annual salary difference is

Position Upgrade Request from Assistant Engineer to Associate Engineer Page 2 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
approximately $15,586. The Associate Engineer classification is exempt from overtime, while the Assistant Engineer classification is eligible for overtime compensation. As a result, the actual net increase in annual personnel costs may be partially offset by the elimination of overtime costs associated with the Assistant Engineer position.

The current budget appropriation is adequate to cover the new Associate Engineer for the remainder of the fiscal year.

BACKGROUND
The current Assistant Engineer position was vacated effective September 19, 2026. Public Works request to upgrade the current vacant position is largely based on the anticipated workload which requires work at the Associate Engineer level.

The City's existing job classifications recognize an important distinction between the two positions:
• Assistant Engineer: Works under supervision on projects that are typically less complex and are managed with oversight from the Associate Engineer or Engineering Manager. • Associate Engineer: Works under general supervision and performs complex professional engineering and project management assignments requiring more specialized knowledge.

The upgrade would align the position with the increased complexity, independence, project management responsibility, and the technical expertise now required by the Engineering Division and provide the level of experience necessary to address the City’s current and anticipated engineering workload.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Increased Grant Funded Capital Project Workload
Federal grant funding, along with other state and regional funding sources, has become a significant and ongoing component of the City's Capital Improvement Program:
• More than $6 million in federal grant funding has already been awarded for projects that must advance to construction within approximately the next two years. • The City has significantly increased the number and dollar amount of federal, state and local grant applications submitted over the last several years, resulting in substantial funding awards.
• Additional federal grant funding is currently pending, along with more than $2 million in pending state and regional grant funding.
• These grants are associated with ongoing funding programs, and the City anticipates continuing to pursue federal and state funding opportunities.

Federally and state-funded projects require careful management of project schedules and budgets, consultants, environmental requirements, bidding and contracting, documentation, funding requirements, construction administration, and inter-agency coordination. Failure to meet applicable requirements and delivery deadlines can delay projects and place outside funding at risk.

Because these projects are already funded and must advance within established delivery

Position Upgrade Request from Assistant Engineer to Associate Engineer Page 3 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
deadlines, the Department requires an engineer who can independently assume responsibility for complex project delivery upon assignment. The schedules and funding requirements necessitate an engineer with the requisite project management experience at the outset of these assignments.

Development, Regulatory, and Public Information Responsibilities The need for greater independent engineering capacity is not limited to the City's capital program.

The Engineering Division is concurrently experiencing increased demands in other areas, including:
• Private Development: Two large multifamily residential developments totaling more than 200 housing units are currently under construction, requiring ongoing engineering review, inspection, coordination, and resolution of infrastructure and right-of-way issues. • Environmental Compliance: Continuing NPDES inspection, documentation, and other environmental compliance responsibilities.
• Public Records: Increased demands for engineering records and technical information, with approximately 10 active Public Records Act requests currently requiring staff review, research, coordination, and response.

These responsibilities occur concurrently with the delivery of the City's Capital Improvement Program and require staff to manage competing priorities and deadlines while coordinating with consultants, developers, contractors, regulatory agencies, and the public.

Organizational Need
Taken together, these changes represent not only an increase in workload, but a sustained increase in the complexity, responsibility, and level of independent judgment required of the position. The Associate Engineer classification more appropriately reflects the work now required, including:
• Independent management of complex capital improvement projects, including schedules, budgets, consultants, and construction activities; • Preparation and review of plans, specifications, estimates, contracts, and technical documents;
• Administration of bidding, contracting, environmental review, and change orders; and • Review and coordination of significant development projects and coordination with consultants, contractors, developers, utilities, regulatory agencies, and other governmental agencies.

Upgrading the position would also reduce the level of routine project oversight required from the Engineering Manager and Director of Public Works, allowing management staff to focus on overall CIP delivery, funding strategy, inter-agency coordination, development oversight, and other division-wide responsibilities.

These changes are not associated with a single project or temporary workload increase. The City's continued pursuit of outside funding, active development activity, and ongoing regulatory responsibilities demonstrate a sustained need for higher-level engineering capacity.

ALTERNATIVES
There are currently no alternatives proposed as part of this request.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

Position Upgrade Request from Assistant Engineer to Associate Engineer Page 4 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Cindy Balderas
Human Resources Manager

Agenda Item Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Anne Moore, Senior Planner
Subject: Adopt Ordinance 1340, Approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 26-04, to Amend Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.508 Specific Plan No. 6, to Conditionally Permit the Operation of New Vehicle Sales and Associated Accessory Uses, and Outdoor Storage in Association with an Approved Primary Use. ____________________________________________________________________________ At the regular City Council meeting of September 8, 2026, the City Council voted 5-0 to introduce Ordinance 1340 approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 26-04.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council:
• Conduct a second reading
• Adopt Ordinance 1340, approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 26-04 Attachment:

1. Ordinance 1340

ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE 1340

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 26-04, AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18-ZONING, CHAPTER 18.508 SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 6, TO

CONDITIONALLY PERMIT THE OPERATION OF NEW VEHICLE SALES AND ACCESSORY

USES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRIMARY USE OF NEW VEHICLE SALES, WHICH INCLUDE

SALE OF USED VEHICLES, AND SERVICE OF VEHICLES, AND TO CONDITIONALLY

PERMIT OUTDOOR STORAGE IN ASSOCIATION WITH AN APPROVED PRIMARY USE (CURRENTLY PROHIBITED).

WHEREAS, an Amendment to the San Dimas Municipal Code has been duly initiated by:

Brendan Williams
607 Hansen Way,
Palo Alto, CA 94304; and
WHEREAS, the Amendment is described as an amendment to Title 18-Zoning, Chapter

18.508 Specific Plan No. 6 to conditionally permit the operation of new vehicle sales and accessory uses associated with the primary use of new vehicle sales, which include sale of used vehicles, and service of vehicles, and to conditionally permit outdoor storage in association with an approved primary use (currently prohibited); and
WHEREAS, the Amendment to amend Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.508 Specific Plan No. 6 would affect the entire Specific Plan No. 6, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a noticed public hearing on August 20, 2026, heard evidence and voted 4-0-1 recommending approval to the City Council of Municipal Code Text Amendment 26-04; and
WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the City Council public hearing on the matter and that the public hearing was held on September 8, 2026, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., with all testimony received being made a part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met for the consideration of whether the project will have a significant effect on the environment. It has been determined that this action is not a project under CEQA, as there will be no direct physical or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the evidence received at the City Council hearing; and or the reasons discussed by the City Council at the September 8, 2026 hearing, the City Council now finds as follows:

A. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value, precedent or be detrimental to the area.

The proposed amendments will not be detrimental to adjoining properties or the general area. The amendment will introduce a new conditional use of new vehicle sales, and may include sale of used vehicles, and service of vehicles, as accessory uses. The proposed conditional use is already conditionally permitted within other areas in the city that are designated as industrial. The amendment for new vehicle sales and accessory associated uses will provide the same conditional use opportunity for the other properties within

Ordinance 1340 Page 2
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
Specific Plan No. 6 that have an industrial designation. The amendment will allow the applicant/business operator to do a tenant improvement of an existing 51,000 square-foot industrial warehouse building to serve as a sales, service, and delivery center for Rivian, an American electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer.

The amendment will also allow the applicant/business operator to have outdoor storage of vehicles, which is necessary for their inventory and service logistics. The inclusion of the parking lot area across the street from the sales showroom and service center will allow for a large inventory of vehicles to be sold and serviced and thereby possibly increasing sales tax revenue for the City. In addition, any future expansion or significant modification to the use will require the submittal of a new CUP Application and the review and approval by the Planning Commission to assist in mitigating any adverse effects to the surrounding community.

B. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment will further the public health, safety and general welfare.

The proposed amendments will further the general welfare of San Dimas by allowing for a new vehicle sales business to operate within the City, which will provide the community with a local option to purchase a zero emissions vehicle. The amendment will bring in a conditional use that is confined within an area of the city that is not adjacent to any nearby residential uses and thus, would not negatively impact the general welfare of the community. The new vehicle sales and associated accessory uses within the area will in turn support the economic health of the community by providing additional job opportunities and sales tax revenue.

The amendment to conditionally permit outdoor storage in association with an approved primary use will eliminate the current prohibition of outdoor storage within the Specific Plan No. 6, Areas 1, 3, and 4. By allowing for outdoor storage and outdoor storage of vehicles to be a conditionally permitted use only within Areas 1, 3 and 4, it allows the city to provide more flexibility in SP-6 with other potential new vehicle sale businesses and other warehouse/manufacture business that require outdoor storage as an accessory use to their primary business operations. By implementing a conditional use permit for outdoor storage, it will allow the city to control the type of outdoor storage use, which will further the public health, safety, and general welfare of San Dimas.

C. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and applicable Zoning.

The proposed amendments will be consistent with the General Plan designation land use of the zone as it is classified as Industrial. The operation of new vehicle sales and accessory uses associated with the primary use of new vehicle sales, which include sale of used vehicles, and service of vehicles is already conditionally allowed in properties that are located within an industrial zone. The amendment will now extend the conditional use to Specific Plan No. 6, Areas 1, 3, and 4 and comply with the General Plan Land Use Element Objective 4.1 “Promote future land use and development patterns which reduce costs of infrastructure construction, encourages transit to make better use of existing facilities, and achieve a good match between future growth and phasing of existing facilities or expansion of new ones.” The amendment to introduce a new conditional use

Ordinance 1340 Page 3
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
to allow new vehicle sales and accessory uses associated with the primary use of new vehicle sales will further allow for potential development growth of Specific Plan No. 6.

The amendment to allow for outdoor storage provides flexibility for new businesses that may require accessory outdoor storage as part of their primary use. Outdoor storage of vehicles when accessory to new vehicle sales allows for maximization of the unaddressed parking lot located across from the showroom and sales floor in order to provide ample vehicle inventory for the community to shop or receive service for a zero emissions vehicle.

NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN DIMAS, California, does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. ADOPTION. Municipal Code Text Amendment 26-04 amending Title 18- Zoning, Chapter 18.508 Specific Plan No. 6 of the San Dimas Municipal Code to conditionally permit the operation of new vehicle sales and accessory uses associated with the primary use of new vehicle sales, which include sale of used vehicles, and service of vehicles, and to conditionally permit outdoor storage in association with an approved primary use (currently prohibited) as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, is hereby adopted.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 3. CEQA DETERMINATION. The City Council hereby finds and determines that is can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this ordinance may have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Thus, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted at the duly designated posting places within the City and published once within 15 days after passage and adoption as may be required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of San Dimas hereby designated for that purpose; or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and certified copy of the text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk five days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and, within 15 days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published, the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk.

Ordinance 1340 Page 4
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas this 22 day of September, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________ ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk Jeff Malawy, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, do hereby certify that Ordinance 1340 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas on the 8th day of September, 2026, and thereafter passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 22 day of September, 2026. ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Ordinance 1340 Page 5
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026

EXHIBIT A
• New text changes are in Blue and Underlined
• Deleted text is in Red and Strikethrough
CHAPTER 18.508
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 6
§ 18.508.010. Location.

Specific Plan No. 6 applies to the area located south of Covina Boulevard, east of the 210 Freeway, and north of Walnut Creek. The parcel consists of 43.1± acres, legally described as shown in Exhibit A attached to this chapter.
(Ord. 676 § 1 (1), 1979)
§ 18.508.020. Description.

The site is predominantly level land with some steep slope areas leading into Walnut Creek. The site is unique because of its visibility from surrounding areas and views of Walnut Creek and Bonelli Park. The site can be viewed from the:

A. West—210 Freeway. The freeway is elevated and the entire site is visible when heading north descending from the San Jose hills. The south portions of the site are particularly visible when exiting at the Covina Boulevard off-ramp which ranges from twenty to zero feet above the parcel.

B. South—Southerly of Walnut Creek. South facing portions of the parcel are visible from San Dimas Avenue when looking north.

C. East—Across Walnut Creek. The La Cuesta Encantada condominiums are at the same elevation as the subject property and view the site.

D. North. People travelling on Covina Boulevard can view the site when looking southerly.

When looking south from the subject property, there is a particularly scenic view of Walnut Creek and natural picnic areas of Frank G. Bonelli Regional County Park. (Ord. 676 § 1 (2), 1979)
§ 18.508.030. Purpose and intent.

The purpose of Specific Plan No. 6 is to provide for the classification and development of parcels of land as coordinated, comprehensive projects so as to take advantage of the superior environment which will result from large scale community planning and provide for the highest and best use of the land. The regulations established by Specific Plan No. 6 are intended to allow a diversity of uses and development standards created specifically for the project area while ensuring substantial compliance with the spirit, intent and provisions of this code. Although it is customary to establish minimum area and lot dimensions for developable sites, the planning commission and city council desire to provide for the maximum creativity in the development of property. This chapter recognizes that parcels will be created and thereafter developed.

However, the city council, upon recommendation from the planning commission, reserves the right to determine the minimum parcel size, area and lot dimensions and no parcel shall be created except as approved by the city council upon recommendation from the planning

Ordinance 1340 Page 6
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
commission. The city council, upon recommendation from the planning commission, reserves the right to impose any conditions upon the parcel map which are required or necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this chapter. Alternative development standards have been incorporated in this specific plan in return for development sensitivity to protect the significant unique features of the site, and increased amenities to serve the inhabitants of this and surrounding community areas.
(Ord. 676 § 1 (3), 1979)
§ 18.508.040. General provisions.

A. Unless otherwise specified, all development within Specific Plan No. 6 shall comply with this code. Terms used in this chapter shall have the same meaning as defined elsewhere in this code unless otherwise defined in this chapter.

B. All references in this chapter relate to other portions of the municipal code as currently written unless expressly provided to the contrary. In the event that any condition or term set out in this chapter is declared illegal or unenforceable, the other terms and conditions shall remain in full force and effect to the full extent permitted by law.

C. The specific plan is an instrument for guiding, coordinating, and regulating the development of property within the area designated on the area map (in this chapter, "area map") attached to this specific plan and incorporated in this chapter as Exhibit A. The plan replaces the usual zoning regulations. It is a "specific plan" as authorized in Article 8 of Chapter 3 of the state Planning and Zoning Law. The plan is consistent with and carries out the projections of the general plan of the city. (Ord. 676 § 1 (4), 1979)
§ 18.508.050. Development plan approval.

Before any building or structure is erected on any lot, a development plan shall be submitted for review to and be approved by the planning commission and city council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.12 of this title.
(Ord. 676 § 1 (7), 1979)
§ 18.508.060. Resubdividing of property.

When a building is constructed for a permitted use, no further additional subdividing of the building for additional uses shall be authorized for permitted without the approval of the city council upon recommendation from the planning commission.
(Ord. 676 § 1 (8), 1979)
§ 18.508.070. Uses in specific plan areas.

Buildings, structures and land shall be used and buildings and structures shall hereafter be erected, structurally altered or enlarged only for the permitted and conditional uses described in each area. Conditional uses shall be filed pursuant to Chapter 18.200 of this title. [Article 1.5, Chapter 5]. All uses shall be subject to the property development standards in Sections

18.508.120 through 18.508.130 and 18.508.140 of this chapter and shall be located only where designated on the specific plan map exhibit. All uses and storage shall be conducted within a totally enclosed building, except as permitted by a conditional use permit. (Ord. 676 § 1 (5), 1979)
§ 18.508.080. Area 1—Industrial uses.

Ordinance 1340 Page 7
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
Purpose. To provide for the aesthetically pleasing development of industrial buildings to house uses which include fabrication, manufacturing, assembly or processing of materials that are in already processed form, wholesaling and warehousing.

A. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses in the I-P zone are as follows:

1. Box lunch and/or catering services;

2. Cartography;

3. Electro-mechanical and electronic product manufacturing;

4. Fabrication and design of components, metallurgical products;

5. Janitorial equipment and services, wholesale and/or retail;

6. Machine shops;

7. Mail order houses, including warehousing;

8. Manufacturing, compounding, processing, packaging or treatment of products such as:
a. Alcoholic beverages,
b. Bakery goods,
c. Candy,
d. Cosmetics,
e. Dairy products,
f. Drugs,
g. Food products (excluding sauerkraut, vinegar, yeast and rendering of fats and oils),
h. Perfumes,
i. Toiletries;

9. Manufacturing, compounding, assembly or treatment of articles or merchandise from the following previously prepared materials:
a. Bone,
b. Canvas,
c. Cellophane,
d. Cloth,
e. Cork,
f. Feathers,
g. Felt,

Ordinance 1340 Page 8
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
h. Fur,
i. Glass,
j. Hair,
k. Horns,
l. Leather,
m. Metals,
n. Paints not employing a boiling process,
o. Paper,
p. Plasters,
q. Precious and semiprecious stones and metals,
r. Rubber and metal stamps,
s. Shells,
t. Shoes,
u. Textiles,
v. Tobacco,
w. Wood,
x. Yarns;

10. Optical products;

11. Paint shops (excluding manufacturing of paint and painting of motor vehicles);

12. Pharmaceutical research and/or processing;

13. Printing services—wholesale and/or retail;

14. Processing, including:
a. Blueprinting or photocopying,
b. Creameries,
c. Dry cleaning and dying plants,
d. Laboratories,
e. Laundries;

15. Stained glass assembly;

16. Upholstery;

Ordinance 1340 Page 9
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026

17. Wholesaling and warehousing;

18. Research and development laboratories;

19. Bookbinding, lithography, photograving;

20. Precision machine shops for prototype production;

21. Assembly and fabrication of products which are the result of research and development conducted on premises;

22. Communication equipment buildings, motion picture processing, radio and television broadcasting studios, recording studios;

23. Residential uses for plant security personnel;

24. Furniture and household goods, transfer and storage;

25. Vitamin processing.

B. Accessory Uses. Accessory uses in the I-P zone are as follows: permitted as accessory functions to permitted uses only:

1. Administrative, professional, medical, business offices;

2. Auditoriums;

3. Cafeterias;

4. Restaurants;

5. Accessory massage permitted with the following primary businesses: medical doctor's office and similar uses.

C. Conditional Uses.

1. Animal hospital and/or animal research;

2. Chemical laboratories, compounding of chemicals;

3. Decorative metal ironworks;

4. Heliport;

5. Plastics and synthetics;

6. Tasting rooms providing on-site alcoholic beverage tastings and the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption provided that the alcoholic beverage is produced on the premises. Tasting rooms may include other ancillary activities to the tastings such as food trucks and live entertainment, provided that all uses are secondary and incidental to the manufacturing component and that, prior to their commencement, a site plan approval by the planning division is obtained for any outdoor activities and a live entertainment permit from the license and permit hearing board is obtained for any live entertainment. Parking for such uses shall comply with the provisions of Chapter

18.156 or the business owner shall be required to demonstrate that the hours of the tasting room will not conflict with the other businesses on site to the satisfaction of the

Ordinance 1340 Page 10
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
planning commission.

7. Outdoor uses incidental to and directly related to those uses permitted in Section

18.508.080(A) of this section.

8. Administrative, professional, medical and business offices.

9. Cafeterias, cafés, restaurants, auditoriums or recreational facilities.

10. Glass edging, leveling and silvering, in connection with the sale of mirrors.

11. New vehicle sales only; sale of used vehicles is prohibited as a primary use.

12. Accessory uses in conjunction with the sale of new vehicles, uses are not permitted otherwise:
a. Sale of used vehicles;
b. Service/maintenance of vehicles;
c. Outdoor storage of vehicles;

13. Outdoor storage as an accessory use to a permitted or conditionally permitted use in Area 1.
(Ord. 676 § 1 (5 (A)), 1979; Ord. 811 §§ 1, 2, 1984; Ord. 1085 § 13, 1998; Ord. 1185 § 17, 2008; Ord. 1244 § 1, 2016; Ord. 1324, 6/10/2025)
§ 18.508.090. Area 2—Administrative/ professional uses.

Purpose. The purpose of Area 2 is to provide for the low-intensity development of buildings for administrative and professional offices in a landscaped, aesthetically pleasing, parklike setting taking advantage of existing natural scenic views.

A. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses in Area 2 are as follows:

1. Accounting;

2. Administrative offices;

3. Architectural services;

4. Art gallery;

5. Artist or photographer's studio;

6. Business and management consulting;

7. Data processing;

8. Engineering services and consultants;

9. General research, not involving manufacturing, processing, fabrication, or sale of products;

10. Insurance brokers, agents and adjusters;

11. Land planning services and consulting;

Ordinance 1340 Page 11
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026

12. Law offices;

13. Medical, dental and biological laboratories;

14. Notary public;

15. Office supplies—wholesale and retail;

16. Real estate broker;

17. Public uses, including:
a. Government offices,
b. Library,
c. Museum,
d. Post office,
e. Public utility customer service office;

18. Accessory massage permitted with the following primary businesses: medical doctor's office and similar uses.

B. Conditional Uses. Conditional uses in Area 2 shall be as follows:

1. Coffee shop or restaurant;

2. Educational institution;

3. Mortuary;

4. Private club.
(Ord. 676 § 1 (5 (B)), 1979; Ord. 1085 § 13, 1998; Ord. 1185 § 18, 2008) § 18.508.100. Area 3—Industrial park (I-P) zone uses.

Purpose. The purpose of the I-P Industrial Park zone is to provide a district which will assure an environment conducive to research and development, fabrication and assembly, research institutions and administrative facilities as well-designed and properly landscaped.

A. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses shall be all uses listed as permitted or accessory uses in Area 1.

B. Conditional Uses. Conditional uses shall be all uses listed as conditional uses in Area 1.
(Ord. 811 § 3, 1984)
§ 18.508.110. Area 4—Industrial park (I-P) zone uses.

Purpose. The purpose of the I-P Industrial Park zone is to provide a district which will assure an environment conducive to research and development, fabrication and assembly, research institutions and administrative facilities as well designed and properly landscaped.

A. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses shall be all uses listed as permitted or accessory uses in Area 1.

Ordinance 1340 Page 12
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
B. Conditional Uses. Conditional uses shall be all uses listed as conditional uses in Area 1.
(Ord. 811 § 4, 1984)
§ 18.508.120. Property development standards—Area 1.

A. Parcels may be established with a lot area and minimum dimension as approved by the city council upon recommendation from the planning commission, through the parcel map review procedure.

B. Building Height. Maximum Height of any structure shall not exceed thirty-five feet above ground level unless approved by a conditional use permit.

C. Building Type. Buildings shall be of tilt-up concrete or decorative masonry.

D. Ground Coverage. Maximum ground coverage on any parcel, by buildings or structures shall not exceed fifty percent of the gross lot area.

E. Yards.

1. Covina Boulevard.
a. Minimum building setback, thirty-five feet;
b. Minimum landscaped setback, twenty-five feet.

2. Interior Street.
a. Minimum building setback, as approved on specific plan; b. Minimum landscaped setback, fifteen feet.

3. Side. A minimum five-foot wide landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to the side building walls except south and east elevations of buildings on certain lots.

4. Rear. No requirements.

5. Buffer. Buffer and screening landscaping shall be provided along the entire top of slope of the property, and along the west boundary.

F. Signs.

1. Identification signs may be provided for the entire complex subject to the following conditions:
a. Such sign shall not exceed one hundred fifty square feet per face; b. Such sign or signs may be located at each major entrance and shall not exceed six feet in overall height;

2. Individual business identification signs may be provided subject to the following conditions:
a. One sign may be provided flush mounted to the building wall, no part of

Ordinance 1340 Page 13
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
which shall extend above the highest part of the wall to which it is affixed; b. No sign shall exceed two square feet of sign in area for each lineal foot of building frontage and shall not exceed one hundred fifty square feet; c. Signs shall be of sandblasted wood-type material only.

G. Utilities.

1. All utilities shall be underground;

2. Gas and electric meter locations shall be determined in preliminary design phases to minimize intrusion of meters into architectural design of the building;

3. Major electrical transformer locations shall be determined in preliminary design phases to minimize intrusion into project design.

H. Lighting.

1. Design and fixture type shall be submitted for review by the planning division, unless associated with a development plan, at which it shall be subject to the review authority pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title.

I. Trash Storage.

1. Location and quantity of trash storage areas shall be subject to review by the planning division unless associated with a development plan, at which it shall be subject to the review authority pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title; J. Landscaping.

1. Landscaping shall be installed pursuant to a landscape and sprinkler plan submitted for review by the planning division, unless associated with a development plan, at which it shall be subject to the review authority review body pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title;
K. Mechanical Equipment.

1. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment is subject to review by the planning division unless associated with a development plan, at which it shall be subject to the review authority pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title. Roof-mounted equipment may be prohibited in visually sensitive areas.

2. All ground-mounted mechanical and electrical equipment shall be screened from view by fencing and/or landscaping compatible to the building architecture.

Screening is subject to review and approval by the review authority pursuant to Chapter 18.12 of this title prior to installation.

L. Performance Standards. The requirements of Section 18.128.120 (A) through (G) of this title shall apply.

M. Outdoor Storage. Outdoor or overnight storage is expressly prohibited; including, but not limited to, any materials, equipment, pallets or similar items.

M.N. Reciprocal Parking Easements. Reciprocal access, maintenance and parking

Ordinance 1340 Page 14
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
easements may be required of the developer satisfactory to the director of planning and city attorney where appropriate due to site design considerations. (Ord. 676 § 1 (6 (A)), 1979; Ord. 908 § 7 (A), 1989; Ord. 996 § 4, 1993; Ord. 1324, 6/ 10/2025)
§ 18.508.130. Property development standards—Area 2.

A. Parcels may be established with a lot area and minimum dimension as approved by the city council upon recommendation from the planning commission, through the parcel map review procedure.

B. Building Height. Maximum building height of any structure shall not exceed thirty feet above grade level unless approved by conditional use permit.

C. Building Type. Tilt-up concrete, brick, decorative block, and all other types must be submitted for review and approval by the review authority pursuant to Chapter

18.12 of this title. Metal buildings are prohibited.

D. Ground Coverage. Maximum ground coverage on any parcel by buildings and structures shall not exceed thirty-five percent of the gross lot area.

E. Yards. Development standards for yards are as follows:

1. Front, fifteen feet;

2. Side, a minimum five-foot wide landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to the side building walls;

3. Rear, no requirement.

F. Reciprocal Parking Easement. Reciprocal access, maintenance and parking easements may be required of the developer satisfactory to the director of planning community development and city attorney where appropriate due to site design considerations.

G. Signs. Sign requirements are the same as contained in Section 18.508.120 (F) of this chapter.

H. Utilities. Utility requirements are the same as contained in Section 18.508.120 (G) of this chapter.

I. Lighting. Lighting requirements are the same as contained in Section 18.508.120(H) of this chapter.

J. Trash Storage. Trash storage requirements are the same as contained in Section

18.508.120 (I) of this chapter.

K. Landscaping. Landscaping requirements are the same as contained in Section

18.508.120 (J) of this chapter.

L. Mechanical Equipment. Mechanical equipment requirements are the same as contained in Section 18.508.120 (K) of this chapter.

M. Outdoor Storage. Outdoor storage requirements are the same as contained in

Ordinance 1340 Page 15
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
Section 18.508.120 (M) of this chapter. Outdoor storage is expressly prohibited; including, but not limited to, any materials, equipment, pallets or similar items. (Ord. 676 § 1 (6 (B)), 1979; Ord. 908 § 7 (B), 1989; Ord. 996 § 4, 1993; Ord. 1324, 6/ 10/2025)
§ 18.508.140. Property development standards—Area 3.

All commercial development in Area 3 shall comply with all development standards of the C-N zone, Section 18.96.050 of this title.

Reciprocal access, maintenance and parking easements may be required of the developer satisfactory to the director of planning community development and city attorney where appropriate due to site design considerations.

Exhibit A
Beginning at a point at the intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of the 210 Freeway and the southerly right-of-way line of Covina Boulevard; thence, easterly along said southerly right-ofway line of Covina Boulevard 456.36 feet; thence, northeasterly along said southerly right-of-way line of Covina Boulevard 322.02 feet; thence, easterly along said southerly right-of-way line of Covina Boulevard 1131.27 feet; thence, southerly 630 feet; thence, westerly 538.5 feet; thence S 13° 50′ W 100 feet; thence, S 48° 15′ W 129 feet; thence, S 57° 45′ W 115 feet; thence, N 61° 29′ W 376 feet; thence, S 87° 38′ W 235 feet; thence, southerly 171.12 feet; thence, N 84° 56′ W 91.5 feet; thence, S 46° 54′ W 245.40 feet; thence, S 29° 40′ W 96.00 feet; thence S 17° 37′ W 280.20 feet; thence, S 42° 12′ W 173.80 feet; thence, N 82° 27′ W 87.86 feet; thence, N 16° 44′ 25″ E

36.17 feet; thence, N 62° 45′ 32" W 288.88 feet; thence, N 4° 16′ 05″ E 288.05 feet; thence, N 7° 53′ 26″ E 242.21; thence, N 18° 53′ 22″ E 136.50 feet; thence, N 38° 20′ 42″ E 457.24 feet; thence, N 0° 16′ 25″ W 368.09 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Ordinance 1340 Page 16
MCTA 26-04
September 8, 2026
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 6*
Delete this Exhibit B
*Exhibit B was never updated as part of Ord. 811 adopted in 1984. (Ord. 676 § 1 (6 (C)), 1979)

Successor Agency
Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Luis Torrico, Director of Community Development Subject: Approve a Budget Appropriation of $106,260 from the General Fund and Approve and Authorize the Executive Director to execute an Agreement with Psomas to Prepare a Remediation Work Plan for Remediation of the Property at 344 W. Bonita Avenue
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
City Staff has been discussing potential changes to the Disposition and Development Agreement with the developer for the PSQ project. One of the requested changes includes the City absorbing the costs to secure an approved work plan from the Department of Toxic and Substance Control (DTSC). The work plan will provide details on all aspects of the cleanup/remediation for the property. Psomas, one of the City’s on-call environmental consulting firms, has provided a proposal to prepare the remediation work plan for $96,600.

The total cost of $106,260 includes a 10% contingency.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council and Successor Agency:
• Approve the appropriation of $106,260, for the PSQ project for the preparation of a remediation work plan, to Community Development’s Professional Services budget (01- 4308-020-000); and
• Authorize the Executive Director or designee to execute an agreement with Psomas in the amount of $106,260.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed contract for the preparation of a remediation work plan for the PSQ project with Psomas is for $106,260, which includes a 10% contingency. The Fiscal Year 2026-27 Community

Psomas Contract Budget Appropriation Page 2
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Development Professional Services budget (01-4308-020-000) has a current balance of $13,362 and will be increased by $106,260 for a new total allowable budget of $119,622.

BACKGROUND
City Staff has been discussing potential changes to the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with Pioneer Square, LLC (PSQ), the developer for the 344 W. Bonita Avenue site. One of the requested changes includes the City absorbing the costs to secure an approved work plan from the Department of Toxic and Substance Control (DTSC). The work plan will provide details on all aspects of the cleanup/remediation for the property. The request is not unusual for real estate transactions as a buyer would typically want assurance that the property is fully usable for the intended purpose and have an understanding of the undertaking required to remediate the site. While the City will incur these upfront costs, Staff will have further negotiations with PSQ; which will include a request that if PSQ moves forward with the project, that the City be reimbursed for costs associated with the preparation of the work plan.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
City Staff reached out to Psomas, one of the City’s on-call environmental consulting firms, to provide a proposal to provide a remediation work plan for the project. The total cost will consist of $106,260, which includes Psomas’s cost of $96,600 (Attachment 1) and a 10% contingency of $9,660.

The work plan will include, but not limited to, a conceptual remediation design for the site and operation maintenance plan for the remediation work to be completed. The work plan will allow PSQ to determine whether the remediation is financially feasible for them to move forward with the project. In the event PSQ does not move forward with the project, the work plan can be used by any future potential buyer.

ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternatives proposed for this request.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Luis Torrico
Director of Community Development
Attachments:

1. Psomas Proposal

5 Hutton Centre Drive
Suite 300
Santa Ana, CA 92707
Tel 714.751.7373
www.Psomas.com
August 19, 2026
Luis Torrico VIA EMAIL
Director of Community Development [email protected] City of San Dimas
245 E. Bonita Avenue
San Dimas, California 91773
Subject: Proposal to Prepare a Remediation Work Plan for Three Parcels located at 334 & 344 West Bonita Avenue and 108 & 112 North Cataract Avenue, San Dimas, California
Dear Luis Torrico:

Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal for the preparation of a remediation work plan for three parcels located at 334 & 344 West Bonita Avenue and 108 & 112 North Cataract Avenue in the City of San Dimas. It is our understanding that a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) has been prepared and provided a recommendation to present possible vapor intrusion into interior spaces within structures that may be constructed on the western and central portions of the site.

In response to a request by the City, Psomas has prepared this proposal to prepare a Remediation Work Plan. This proposed work effort includes the following:

1. Engagement with DTSC $7,400.00
• Initial meetings with DTSC to discuss the development, history, and the anticipated plan moving forward, including potential voluntary cleanup agreement

2. Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) $26,900.00
• Existing site characterization data will be used
• Includes one round of comment response (10 hours)

3. Remediation Work Plan (RWP), (per VIMA) $45,000.00
• Existing site characterization data will be used
• Conceptual Remediation Design
• Operation & Maintenance Plan
• Assumes CEQA exemption is valid
• Does not include any additional permitting, agreements, sampling or analysis ATTACHMENT 1

Luis Torrico
August 19, 2026

4. DTSC RWP Review Comments/Participation $11,100.00
• Includes two rounds of comments and responses (30 hours) • Does not include DTSC oversight billing during review • Public participation (if required, 10 hours)

5. Compile DTSC Certification Package, submit to City Planning $6,200.00 Psomas will prepare a draft Remediation Work Plan and Design for the City’s use within two weeks from notice to proceed. This scope of work assumes Psomas will provide one draft and one final version of the Work Plan.

We are requesting a total fee of $96,600.00. For this project, Ryan Eddy will serve as the City’s main contact. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the City of San Dimas in the preparation of the environmental documentation for the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to discuss our proposal, please feel free to contact Ryan at [email protected], 801.972.4858.

Sincerely,
PSOMAS
Jennifer Y. Marks
Vice President/Contract Administrator
R:\Proposals\San Dimas\Three Parcels\SOW San Dimas Remediation-081926.docx

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Grant Garcia, Management Analyst
Subject: Adopt Resolution Numbers 2026-60, 2026-61, 2026-62 Requesting Transfer of Miscellaneous Transfer Drain (M.T.D.) No. 1852, 1852-01, and 1852-02 to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for Operation and Maintenance ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
On November 24, 1992, the City of San Dimas entered into an agreement with Los Angeles County to transfer and convey storm drain improvements and drainage systems to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for future operation, maintenance, repair, and improvements. Miscellaneous Transfer Drain (M.T.D.) Nos. 1852, 1852-01, and 1852-02 are all part of the Brasada Tract 70583 development and have met the requirements of the above agreement and are ready to be transferred and conveyed.

RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends that the City Council:
• Adopt Resolution Numbers 2026-60, 2026-61 and 2026-62 to transfer Miscellaneous Transfer Drain Nos. 1852, 1852-01, and 1852-02 to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for operation and maintenance.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

The developer of the tract has paid the County transfer fees, so there is no negative impact for the transfer.

Requesting Transfer of Miscellaneous Transfer Drain (M.T.D.) No. 1852, 1852-01, and 1852-02 to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for Operation and Maintenance Page 2 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Failure to transfer the system would result in significant maintenance costs and debris removal costs for the City. The City would also be responsible for maintaining 9 debris basins and several thousand feet of storm drainpipe.

BACKGROUND
In November 1992, the City entered into an agreement with Los Angeles County to transfer and convey storm drain systems to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) for future operation, maintenance, repair and improvements. The agreement requires each miscellaneous transfer drain (M.T.D.) to have its own Resolution. The City Council must approve each Resolution with a four-fifths vote for the County to consider and accept the transfers.

To qualify for the transfer and conveyance program, the storm drain system must meet several requirements. First, the design of the storm drain system must be approved by the County.

Second, the system must be inspected by the County during construction. Third, all downstream drainage systems must already be owned by the County, or the proposed drainage system must be discharged directly into an open channel. A fourth requirement is the payment of fees to process the transfer documents, followed by the execution of those documents . One of the Conditions of Approval for the Brasada tract development was that, once completed, the storm drain system would be transferred and conveyed to the County.

Transferring storm drain systems to the County can be a lengthy process because the system must be inspected and meet all standards with no deficiencies. Additional costs are incurred if the storm drain needs to be re-inspected and the cited deficiencies need to be repaired.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The transfer of the storm drain benefits the City of San Dimas for several reasons. With the transfer, the County essentially owns the storm drain. The County assumes responsibility and all costs associated with cleaning, repairs, and future upgrades if required. This is especially important as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements become increasingly stringent and costly. The County receives funding for upkeep of the drainage system through an existing assessment district for flood control which is collected as part of the property tax for each parcel in the City.

Not transferring the systems will unquestionably result in substantial future costs to the City for maintenance and repair and in the long term, the reconstruction of the drainage system. Due to the increasing costs of maintenance, it is Public Works’ goal to transfer as many M.T.D. systems over to the County as is economically feasible.

ALTERNATIVES
None recommended.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Requesting Transfer of Miscellaneous Transfer Drain (M.T.D.) No. 1852, 1852-01, and 1852-02 to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for Operation and Maintenance Page 3 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Respectfully submitted,
Grant Garcia
Management Analyst
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2026-60 for Transfer of M.T.D. 1852

2. Resolution 2026-61 for Transfer of M.T.D. 1852-01

3. Resolution 2026-62 for Transfer of M.T.D. 1852-02

4. Location Map

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2026-60

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS

ANGELES, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES

COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT, ON

BEHALF OF SAID DISTRICT, THE TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF THE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER DRAIN NO. 1852 IN THE CITY

OF SAN DIMAS FOR FUTURE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND

IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE THEREOF WHEREAS, there have been dedicated to, or the City of San Dimas has otherwise acquired, the storm drain improvements and drainage system known as Miscellaneous Transfer Drain (MTD) No. 1852, depicted on Los Angeles County Flood Control District Drawing Nos DDN275-518-F37 on file with the Director of Public Works for the County Los Angeles; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized and empowered to transfer and convey to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (hereinafter referred to as District) any storm drain improvements and drainage systems for future operation, maintenance, repair, and improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the District entered into an Agreement dated November 24, 1992, and recorded December 22, 1992, as Document No. 92-2403425, of the Official Records in the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's office, whereby the City made certain warranties about its future transfers and conveyances of flood control facilities to the District; and WHEREAS, the best public interest will be served by transfer and conveyance of said storm drain improvements and drainage system from the City to the District for future operation, maintenance, repair, and improvement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City does hereby request the District to accept the transfer and conveyance of the storm drain improvements and drainage system depicted on District Drawing Nos. DDN275-518-F37 on file with the Director of Public Works for the County of Los Angeles.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, subject to the acceptance thereof of the Board of Supervisors of the District, the City Engineer is directed and ordered to prepare all necessary instruments and documents to effectuate the transfer and conveyance and that the Mayor is authorized and instructed to execute said documents and other instruments. The District shall have no obligation or responsibility to maintain the storm drain, improvements, and drainage until all rights of way for the drain now vested in the City and all other necessary rights of way have been conveyed to and accepted by the District.

Resolution 2026-60 Page 2
Miscellaneous Transfer Drain No. 1852
September 22, 2026
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd, day of September, 2026. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, MMC
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that Resolution 2026-60 was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 22nd, day of September, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, MMC
City Clerk

ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION 2026-61

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS

ANGELES, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES

COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT, ON

BEHALF OF SAID DISTRICT, THE TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF THE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER DRAIN NO. 1852-01 IN THE

CITY OF SAN DIMAS FOR FUTURE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND

IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE THEREOF WHEREAS, there have been dedicated to, or the City of San Dimas has otherwise acquired, the storm drain improvements and drainage system known as Miscellaneous Transfer Drain (MTD) No. 1852-01, depicted on Los Angeles County Flood Control District Drawing Nos DDN275-518-F38 on file with the Director of Public Works for the County Los Angeles; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized and empowered to transfer and convey to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (hereinafter referred to as District) any storm drain improvements and drainage systems for future operation, maintenance, repair, and improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the District entered into an Agreement dated November 24, 1992, and recorded December 22, 1992, as Document No. 92-2403425, of the Official Records in the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's office, whereby the City made certain warranties about its future transfers and conveyances of flood control facilities to the District; and WHEREAS, the best public interest will be served by transfer and conveyance of said storm drain improvements and drainage system from the City to the District for future operation, maintenance, repair, and improvement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City does hereby request the District to accept the transfer and conveyance of the storm drain improvements and drainage system depicted on District Drawing Nos. DDN275-518-F38 on file with the Director of Public Works for the County of Los Angeles.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, subject to the acceptance thereof of the Board of Supervisors of the District, the City Engineer is directed and ordered to prepare all necessary instruments and documents to effectuate the transfer and conveyance and that the Mayor is authorized and instructed to execute said documents and other instruments. The District shall have no obligation or responsibility to maintain the storm drain, improvements, and drainage until all rights of way for the drain now vested in the City and all other necessary rights of way have been conveyed to and accepted by the District.

Resolution 2026-61 Page 2
Miscellaneous Transfer Drain No. 1852-01
September 22, 2026
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of September, 2026. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, MMC
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that Resolution 2026-61 was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 22nd , day of September, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, MMC
City Clerk

ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION 2026-62

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS

ANGELES, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES

COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT, ON

BEHALF OF SAID DISTRICT, THE TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF THE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER DRAIN NO. 1852-02 IN THE

CITY OF SAN DIMAS FOR FUTURE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND

IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE THEREOF WHEREAS, there have been dedicated to, or the City of San Dimas has otherwise acquired, the storm drain improvements and drainage system known as Miscellaneous Transfer Drain (MTD) No. 1852-02, depicted on Los Angeles County Flood Control District Drawing Nos DDN275-518-F39 on file with the Director of Public Works for the County Los Angeles; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized and empowered to transfer and convey to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (hereinafter referred to as District) any storm drain improvements and drainage systems for future operation, maintenance, repair, and improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the District entered into an Agreement dated November 24, 1992, and recorded December 22, 1992, as Document No. 92-2403425, of the Official Records in the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's office, whereby the City made certain warranties about its future transfers and conveyances of flood control facilities to the District; and WHEREAS, the best public interest will be served by transfer and conveyance of said storm drain improvements and drainage system from the City to the District for future operation, maintenance, repair, and improvement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City does hereby request the District to accept the transfer and conveyance of the storm drain improvements and drainage system depicted on District Drawing Nos. DDN275-518-F39 on file with the Director of Public Works for the County of Los Angeles.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, subject to the acceptance thereof of the Board of Supervisors of the District, the City Engineer is directed and ordered to prepare all necessary instruments and documents to effectuate the transfer and conveyance and that the Mayor is authorized and instructed to execute said documents and other instruments. The District shall have no obligation or responsibility to maintain the storm drain, improvements, and drainage until all rights of way for the drain now vested in the City and all other necessary rights of way have been conveyed to and accepted by the District.

Resolution 2026-62 Page 2
Miscellaneous Transfer Drain No. 1852-02
September 22, 2026
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd, day of September, 2026. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, MMC
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that Resolution 2026-62 was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 22nd , day of September, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, City Clerk

LOCATION MAP OF MTD 1852, 1852-01, 1852-02 ATTACHMENT 4

Agenda Item Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Anne Moore, Senior Planner
Subject: Approve Time Extension for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 84436 (VTTM 24-01) ____________________________________________________________________________ On December 10, 2024, the City Council approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map 84436 (VTTM 24-01) located at 720 N. Oakway Avenue and an unaddressed parcel (APN: 8392-015-041).

Vesting Tentative Tract Map 84436 proposes to subdivide two (2) adjoining parcels into five (5) parcels within the Single-Family Agriculture (SF-A) Zone for the future development of four (4) new two-story single-family residences (Attachment 2). The unaddressed parcel is currently vacant; however, the property located at 720 N. Oakway Avenue is currently being developed with a new 4,050 square-foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 788 square-foot three-car garage. The approval of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is valid for a period of 24 months (December 10, 2026) unless the Applicant requests an extension for an additional 24 months (December 10, 2028) prior to the expiration date (Attachment 3).

On August 31, 2026, the Applicant submitted a letter requesting a one-time extension for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 84436 pursuant to Government Code Section 66452.11 to extend the map’s expiration date to December 10, 2028 (Attachment 1). The Applicant is requesting this additional time to comply with the conditions of approval and to address plan check corrections in order to record the final tract map.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council approve a 24-month time extension for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 84436 (VTTM 24-01).

Respectfully submitted,
Anne Moore
Senior Planner

Time Extension Request for VTTM 84436 Page 2
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Attachments:

1. Time Extension Request Letter

2. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 84436 (VTTM 24-01)

3. Resolution 2024-90

ATTACHMENT 1

ATTACHMENT 2 Page 78 – 110

RESOLUTION 2024- 90

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS,

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24- 01 ( VTTM 84436), A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE TWO ( 2) ADJOINING PARCELS INTO FIVE ( 5) PARCELS LOCATED AT 720 N. OAKWAY AVENUE APN: 8392- 020- 034 AND AN UNADDRESSED PARCEL ( APN: 8392-015-041) WITHIN THE SINGLE-FAMILY AGRICULTURE 16000 ZONE.

WHEREAS, an application was duly filed for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01 ( VTTM 84436) by:

Dean Hakkak on behalf of HMZ Holdings LLC
P. O. Box 4636
Covina, CA 91723
WHEREAS, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01 ( VTTM 84436) is described as:

A request to subdivide two ( 2) adjoining parcels into five ( 5) parcels ranging from 18, 900 square feet to 33, 075 square feet in lot size at the properties located at 720 N. Oakway ( APN:
8392- 020- 034) and APN: 8392- 015- 041 within the Single -Family Agriculture 16000 Zone; and WHEREAS, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01 ( VTTM 84436) applies to the following described real property:
720 N. Oakway Avenue ( APN: 8392- 020- 034) and APN: 8392-015-041; and WHEREAS, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01 ( VTTM 84436) was submitted to all appropriate agencies as required under Section 17. 12. 030 of the San Dimas Municipal Code with a request for their report and recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received the report and recommendation of such agencies as have submitted information including the written report and recommendation of Staff; and
WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the Planning Commission' s public hearing on the matter and that a public hearing was held on November 21, 2024 at the hour of 6: 00 p. m., with all testimony received being made a part of the public record; and WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the City Council public hearing on the matter and that public hearing was held on December 10, 2024 at the hour of 7: 00 p. m., with all testimony received being made part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Division has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) and the City' s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under the State CEQA Guidelines Title 14, Section 6, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section 15332 Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects.

IIn addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission and City Council has reviewed the Planning Division' s determination of exemption, and based on their own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption.

ATTACHMENT 3

Resolution 2024- 90 Page 2
Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01
December 10, 2024
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the evidence received at the Planning Commission hearing; and or the reasons discussed by the Planning. Commissioners at the November 21, 2024 hearing, and the evidence received at the City Council hearing; and or the reasons discussed by the City Council at the December 10, 2024 hearing, and subject to the Conditions attached as " Attachment 1", the City Council now finds as follows:

A. That the proposed tract map is consistent with the General Plan and the applicable Land Use Zone.

The Vesting Tentative Tract Map creates five ( 5) new parcels from two adjoining parcels, which will be developed consistent with the General Plan and the Single -Family Agriculture 16000 zone. The five ( 5) new parcels will range in size from 18, 900 gross square feet to 33, 075 gross square feet. The newly created parcels meet all the development standards of the Single -Family Agriculture 16000 zone and the underlying General Plan designation of Single -Family Very Low.

B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and the applicable Land Use Zone.

The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Policies, Goal L- 1, Policy 1. 1. 2, " enhance the rural/ equestrian image north of Gladstone Street. Retain large lot development and improve circulation." The five ( 5) new lots, when developed, will meet the minimum lot size of 16, 000 square feet, as required by the Single -Family Agriculture 16, 000 zone. Maintaining the minimum lot size to be 16, 000 square feet and creating a new private driveway access for the five ( 5) new lots is consistent with the underlying General Plan designation of Single -Family Very Low and the stated goal of "retain large lot development and improve circulation." Although there are no residences being proposed at this time, any future residence will be required to meet all of the development requirements of the Single -Family Agriculture 16000 zone.

C. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.

The subdivision creates five ( 5) new lots that range from 18, 900 gross square feet to 33, 075 gross square feet in size. Although there is not a proposed development at this time, the five ( 5) lots are large enough to accommodate residential development which will fit the scale and type of the surrounding neighborhood. Proposed Lot 1 has already been approved to be developed with one two- story single- family residence with an attached three -car garage by the Development Plan Review Board on August 25, 2022, per DPRB Case No. 21- 16 and the removal of eight ( 8) mature trees under Tree Permit No. 21- 45 on August 25, 2022.

D. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.

The Vesting Tentative Tract map would create five ( 5) residential parcels within an existing residential neighborhood. All of the new parcels are large lots, which can easily accommodate a single- family residence, which will be consistent with the Single Family Very Low Land Use designation and Single -Family Agriculture 16000 zoning of the subject site.

Resolution 2024-90 Page 3
Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01
December 10, 2024
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure wildlife or their habitat.

The proposed subdivision to create five ( 5) new parcels will comply with all applicable codes and regulations. There is no development proposed at this time; however, any future development will be required to comply with all applicable codes. While both the subdivision and future residential development are exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as Infill Development, they are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure wildlife or their habitat.

F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

The proposed tract map and required off -site improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project will create five ( 5) parcels for future residential development that will be required to comply with all applicable codes and regulations to prevent serious public health problems.

G. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at -large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.

There exists a 30-foot access easement that runs east west through the subject property, which will be improved to meet the Los Angeles County Fire Department requirements for use as a private driveway and fire lane. Therefore, the new tract map will not conflict with any existing easements.

H. That the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing sewer system will not result in a violation of existing requirements prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Conditions are imposed to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and to implement the intent and purpose of the General Plan.

The proposed subdivision will create five ( 5) residential parcels; however, no development is proposed at this time. At the time of any future development, the Applicant will be required to comply with all Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. In addition, the Conditions of Approval for the project require compliance with BMP' s to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and the intent and purpose of the General Plan.

Resolution 2024- 90 Page 4
Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01
December 10, 2024

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, that the City Council of the City of San Dimas grants approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24- 01 ( VTTM 84436), subject to the Applicant' s compliance with the Conditions as set forth in Attachment 1.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, the 1011 day of December, 2024.

Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:

WADebra Black, City Clerk
I Debra Black, City Clerk, hereby certify that Resolution 2024- 90 was adopted by the City Council of San Dimas at its regular meeting of December 10, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna, Weber
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
A-6-ADebra Black, City Clerk

Resolution 2024- 90 Page 5
Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01
December 10, 2024
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01 ( VTTM 84436)
ACCELA PROJ- 24-13
A request to subdivide two (2) adjoining parcels into five ( 5) parcels ( 18, 900 square feet to 33,075 square feet in size) located at 720 N. Okaway Avenue within the Single -Family Agriculture 16000 zone. No residences are proposed at this time ( APN: 8392- 020-034 and APN: 8392- 015- 041).

PLANNING DIVISION - ( 909) 394-6250

GENERAL
1 The Applicant/Developer shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers or employees because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers or employees for any Court costs and attorney' s fees which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action.

The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve Applicant of his obligations under this condition.

2. The Applicant/ Developer shall be responsible for any City Attorney costs incurred by the City for the project, including, but not limited to, consultations, and the preparation and/ or review of legal documents. The Applicant shall deposit funds with the City to cover these costs in an amount to be determined by the City.

3. The Applicant/ Developer shall comply with all requirements of the Single -Family Agriculture 16000 ( SF- A16000) Zone.

4. The Applicant/ Developer shall sign an affidavit accepting all Conditions and all Standard Conditions prior to Final Map recordation.

5. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall expire twenty-four months following approval, unless an extension for a period or periods not to exceed a total of twenty-four months is granted by the City Council. A subdivider may request an extension by written application to the Director of Community Development. Such application shall be filed at least thirty days before the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is d,ue to expire. Requests for all extensions shall be accompanied by a processing fee as prescribed by resolution of the City Council.

6. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map is subject to City Council approval. Should the City Council approve the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, the Applicant/ Developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval as approved by the City Council on a date to be determined.

7. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours.

8. The perimeter walls for Lot 1 shall be installed as required by DPRB 21- 16 approved on August 25, 2022. The perimeter walls for Lots 2 through 5 shall be constructed in conjunction with the development of single family residences. The walls shall consist of a six-foot high decorative block wall consisting of tan split face block with a finished cap.

Resolution 2024- 90 Page 6
Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01
December 10, 2024
ENGINEERING DIVISION — (909) 394-6240

9. The Applicant/ Developer shall provide a signed copy of the City' s certification statement declaring that the contractor will comply with Minimum Best Management Practices ( BMPs) required by the MS4 permit for Los Angeles County as mandated by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES).

10. A Final Vesting Tract Map prepared by or under the direction of a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor must be processed through the City Engineer prior to being filed with the County Recorder.

11. All easements existing at the time of the Final Vesting Tract Map approval must be accounted for on the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map. This includes the location, owner, purpose, and recording reference for all existing easements. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the tentative map in lieu of its location.

12. A preliminary title report and guarantee is required and such document shall show all fee interest holders; all interest holders whose interest could ripen into a fee; all trust deeds, together with the name of the trustee; and all easement holders. The account for this title report should remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder.

13. The Applicant/ Developer engineer or surveyor shall set durable monuments to the satisfaction of the City Engineer in conformance with Section 66495 of the Subdivision Map Act. The Applicant/Developer shall also provide a Monumentation Bond in an amount sufficient to guarantee the setting of monumentation specified in writing by a Registered Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor of Record.

14. A preliminary title report and guarantee is required and such document shall show all fee interest holders; all interest holders whose interest could ripen into a fee; all trust deeds, together with the name of the trustee; and all easement holders. The account for this title report should remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder.

15. The Applicant/ Developer shall Contact the Los Angeles County Sanitation District for any required annexation, extension, or sewer trunk fee. Proof of payment/ clearance is required before the City will issue any sewer permit.

16. The Applicant/ Developer shall provide drainage improvements to carry runoff of storm waters in the area proposed to be developed, and for contributory drainage from adjoining properties to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The Applicant/ Developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with the downstream property owner for all required downstream storm drain improvements. The proposed drainage improvements shall be based on a detailed Hydrology Study conforming to the current Los Angeles County methodology. The developed flows outletting into the existing downstream system( s) from this project cannot exceed the pre- existing storm flows.

17. Due to construction, the Applicant/ Developer shall be responsible for any repairs within the limits of the development, including but not limited to streets and paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, and street lights as determined by the City Engineer and Public Works Director.

Resolution 2024- 90 Page 7
Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01
December 10, 2024

18. The Applicant/ Developer shall obtain a Public Works permit for all work within or adjacent to the public right- of-way and shall be subject to review and approval of the Public Works Director and the work shall be in accordance with applicable standards of the City of San Dimas; i. e. Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ( Green Book) and the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( CA MUTCD), and further that the construction equipment ingress and egress be controlled by a plan approved by Public Works.

19. For all projects subject to Low Impact Development ( LID) regulations, Applicant/ Developer must submit a site -specific drainage concept and stormwater quality plan to implement LID design principles.

20. A fully executed " Maintenance Covenant for LID Requirements" shall be recorded with the L.A. County Registrar/ Recorder and submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the Certificate of Occupancy. Covenant documents shall be required to include an exhibit that details the installed treatment control devices as well as any site design or source control Best Management Practices ( BMPs) for post construction. The information to be provided on this exhibitshall include, but not be limited to: i. 8 Y2 ) J
X
11" exhibits with record property owner information. ii.

Types of BMPs ( i.e., site design, source control and/or treatment control) to ensure modifications tothe site are not conducted without the property owner being aware of the ramifications to BMP implementation. iii.

Clear depiction of location of BMPs, especially those located below ground. iv.

A matrix depicting thetypes of BMPs, frequency ofinspection, type of maintenance required, and
V.
if proprietary BMPs, the company information toperform thenecessary maintenance.

Calculations tosupport the sizing of the BMPs employed on the project shall be included inthe report. These calculations shall correlate directly with the minimum treatment requirements ofthe current MS4 permit. In the case of implementing infiltration BMPs, a percolation test of the affected soil shall be performed and submitted forreview by the City Engineer. vi.

This document shall be reviewed by and concurred with Public Works toensure the covenant complies with the MS4 Permit. 21.

Improvement plans and necessary letters of credit, cash, and/ or bonds to secure the construction of all streets, storm drains, water, sewer, grading, and multi -use trails shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, and the subdivision agreement and other required agreements approved by the City Attorney, prior to the recordation ofthe Final Map.

22. The Applicant/ Developer shall record a Maintenance Agreement toguarantee maintenance of the private driveway and drainage improvements inperpetuity and must be processed through the City Engineer prior tobeing filed with the County Recorder. Failure to maintain driveway will lead to code compliance action. 23.

The subject development islocated within an area of Special Flood Hazard as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The Applicant/ Developer shall meet all conditions and requirements as set forth in Title 15, Chapter 15.60 of the San Dimas Municipal Code.

Resolution 2024- 90 Page 8
Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24- 01
December 10, 2024

24. The Applicant/ Developer shall underground all new utilities and utility drops.

25. The Applicant/ Developer shall provide mailboxes per City of San Dimas standards. Mailbox locations are subject to the approval of the local postmaster and the City Engineer.

26. The Applicant/ Developer shall submit water plans to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Los Angeles County Fire Department.

PARKS & RECREATION — (909) 394- 6230

27. The Applicant/ Developer shall comply with City regulations regarding payment of Park, Recreation and Open Space Development Fee per SDMC Chapter 3.26. Fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits.';

28. The Subdivision Applicant/ Developer shall comply with Chapter 17. 36 of the San Dimas Municipal Code regarding Park Land Dedication ( Quimby Act). The City may require fees in lieu of land or a combination thereof based on the market value of the land to be dedicated. Fees shall be paid prior to recordation.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT — ( 323) 890-4243

29. Access as noted on the Tentative and the Exhibit Maps shall comply with Title 21 ( County of Los Angeles Subdivision Code) and Section 503 of the Title 32 ( County of Los Angeles Fire Code), which requires an all- weather access surface to be clear to sky.

30. The Private Driveways proposed as private streets for access throughout the development shall be labeled as " Private Driveway" on the Final Map. The portion of the private driveway intended for fire apparatus access shall be identified as " Fire Lane" on the Final Map. All widths and dimensions shall be clearly delineated with a reciprocal access agreement is required for the private driveway. Compliance required prior to Final Map clearance.

31. The Final Map shall be submitted to the Los Angeles County Fire Department Land Development Unit for review and approval prior to recordation.

32. A common access agreement shall be provided for the private driveway since multiple units are sharing the same access. Said agreement shall be submitted to the Los Angeles County Fire Department Land Development Unit for review and approval prior to the Final Map clearance.

End of Conditions

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Luis Torrico, Director of Community Development Subject: Adopt Interim Urgency Ordinance 1341 of the City of San Dimas, Establishing a 45-Day Moratorium on the Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units on Lots Created or Developed Pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero), and Declaring the Urgency Thereof; Adopt Resolution 2026-63 to Prohibit Such Uses by Resolution. This Item is Exempt from CEQA Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3)
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The Starter Home Revitalization Act (SHRA) was signed into law on August 31, 2021. The SHRA required cities to ministerially approve qualifying subdivisions of multi-family zoned lots to provide modestly sized starter single-family homes. On July 1, 2025, SB 1123 went into effect, which expanded the provisions of the SHRA to qualifying single-family zoned lots to allow up to 10 parcels and 10 units, excluding any accessory dwelling unit (ADU) or junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU). SB 1123 also allows cities to prohibit ADUs and JADUs on lots created pursuant to SB 1123.

The proposed Interim Urgency Ordinance will establish a 45-Day moratorium on the development of ADUs and JADUs on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero). The Ordinance will take effect immediately, after a 4/5 vote, and can be extended, after notice and public hearing, for 10 months and 15 days and subsequently extended for one year.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt the Interim Urgency Ordinance through the adoption of Ordinance 1341 (Attachment 1).

Interim Urgency Ordinance 1341 and Resolution 2026-63Page 2 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026

2. Adopt Resolution 2026-63 (Attachment 2), expressing the City Council’s desire to prohibit accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
The Starter Home Revitalization Act (SHRA) was signed into law on August 31, 2021. The SHRA required cities to ministerially approve qualifying subdivisions of multi-family zoned lots to provide modestly sized starter single-family homes. On July 1, 2025, SB 1123 went into effect, which expanded the provisions of the SHRA to qualifying single-family zoned lots to allow up to 10 parcels and 10 units, excluding any accessory dwelling unit (ADU) or junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU).

SB 1123 developments on single-family zoned lots could be significantly impactful to single-family neighborhoods as an eligible lot could be subdivided to provide 10 units, 10 ADUs and 10 JADUs for a total of 30 units on a single-family zoned lot. This assumes that 10 new parcels are created, where each parcel could allow one (1) unit, one (1) ADU and one (1) JADU. While SB 1123 requires cities to approve these projects ministerially, the law does allow cities to prohibit ADUs and JADUs on lots created pursuant to SB 1123.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Recently, the Planning Division has received multiple inquiries about SB 1123 developments on single family zoned properties. No formal applications have been submitted; however, Staff anticipates more inquiries and subsequent development applications. SB 1123 developments present an immediate threat to the public welfare within the City as potential overdevelopment of neighborhoods developed to consist of single-family residences, which could negatively impact the community’s public health, safety and welfare, specifically, traffic safety, parking, and fire access, and placing further strain on existing infrastructure.

Without such moratorium, density in single family neighborhoods can be significantly increased without proper planning to address impacts related to traffic, parking, public safety, fire access, and strain on existing infrastructure. The City’s current ADU Ordinance allows a maximum of one (1) accessory dwelling unit, either attached or detached, and one (1) junior accessory dwelling unit per property in all zones where single-family residential uses are allowed. Single family properties developed pursuant to SB 1123 could result in up to 10 accessory dwelling units and 10 junior accessory dwelling units on one (1) single family property, after it’s subdivided to create 10 lots. This type of development would not be consistent with the purpose and intent of the City’s accessory dwelling unit ordinance.

Therefore, to mitigate some of the impacts created by SB 1123 developments, the proposed Interim Urgency Ordinance would allow the City to establish a 45-day moratorium on the development of ADUs and JADUs on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code

Interim Urgency Ordinance 1341 and Resolution 2026-63Page 3 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero). The Ordinance will take effect immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. Furthermore, the Ordinance can be extended, after notice and public hearing, for 10 months and 15 days and can be subsequently extended for one year. Any extension will also require a four-fifths (4/5) vote for adoption, and is limited to no more than two (2) extensions.

Typically, the approval process for a municipal code text amendment consists of a hearing before the Planning Commission, followed by the introduction of the ordinance to the City Council and subsequently, the second reading before the City Council. The ordinance will go into effect 30 days after the second reading. Adopting the Interim Urgency Ordinance is for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City of San Dimas as it ensures that ADUs and JADUs are developed pursuant to the City’s ADU Ordinance and does not lead to the overdevelopment of single family neighborhoods. The temporary moratorium will allow Staff to initiate an amendment to the San Dimas Municipal Code to codify the prohibition of ADUs and JADUs on lots created or developed pursuant to SB 1123.

In addition to the Interim Urgency Ordinance, Staff has also prepared a Resolution which expresses the City Council’s desire to prohibit ADUs and JADUs on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero). The Resolution will also go into effect upon adoption and further strengthens the City’s position on ADU/JADU development for SB 1123 projects.

ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternatives proposed for this item; however, the City Council could decide not to approve the Interim Urgency Ordinance 1341 or Resolution 2026-63.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Luis Torrico
Director of Community Development
Attachments:

1. Interim Urgency Ordinance 1341

2. Resolution 2026-63

ATTACHMENT 1
01171.0005 2194139.1
URGENCY ORDINANCE 1341

AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS ON LOTS

CREATED OR DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66499.41 (SENATE BILL 1123, CABALLERO), DECLARING THE URGENCY

THEREOF AND FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, the City of San Dimas (City) has the authority, under its police power, to enact regulations for the public peace, morals, and welfare of the City pursuant to California Constitution Article XI, Section 7; and
WHEREAS, the State Planning and Zoning Law (Cal. Gov’t Code Sections 65000, et seq.) broadly empowers the City to plan for and regulate the use and in order to provide for orderly development, the public health, safety, and welfare, and a balancing of property rights and the desires of the community and how its citizens envision their city; and WHEREAS, the City’s Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance, which is codified at Chapter

18.38 of the San Dimas Municipal Code, allows a maximum of one accessory dwelling unit, either attached or detached, and one junior accessory dwelling unit per lot in all zones where singlefamily residential uses are allowed; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 684 (SB 684) was signed into law on October 11, 2023, which requires a ministerial process for subdivisions and housing development projects that can provide up to 10 new lots/residential units in multi-family zones; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1123 (SB 1123) was signed into law on September 19, 2024, which amended SB 684 to require a ministerial process for subdivisions and housing development projects that can provide up to 10 new lots/residential units in single family zones; and WHEREAS, projects in single family zones developed pursuant to SB 1123 could result in up to 10 residential units, 10 accessory dwelling units and 10 junior accessory dwelling units, for a total of 30 units on one single-family zoned property; and WHEREAS, SB 1123 projects with accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units could lead to the overdevelopment of neighborhoods developed to consist of single-family residences, which could negatively impact the community’s public health, safety and welfare, specifically, traffic safety, parking, fire access, and placing further strain on existing infrastructure (e.g. sewer systems, water); and
WHEREAS, the City has received multiple inquiries about SB 1123 developments on single family zoned properties, and the interim urgency ordinance would allow the City to apply the prohibition of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on such forthcoming applications; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41(g), a local agency is not required to permit an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit on parcels created pursuant to SB 1123; and

Urgency Ordinance 1341 Page 2
Interim Urgency ADU/JADU (SB 1123)
01171.0005 2194139.1
WHEREAS, an initial period of 45 days will permit City staff to undertake an initial investigation of these matters and recommend a course of action to the City Council, while avoiding the potential adverse impacts from the development of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero); and
WHEREAS, on September 22, 2026, the City Council considered this Interim Urgency Ordinance at a properly noticed City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which provides that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Where, as here, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question would have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the above-described express statutory authority and its police power, the City Council desires, on an urgency basis, to enact a temporary prohibition on the development of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero).

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

A. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the recitals above are true and correct and hereby adopts the recitals as findings in furtherance of this Ordinance.

B. Additionally, based on the foregoing, both verbal and written testimony at the City Council meeting, including the staff report, exhibits, and any materials provided by members of the public, the City Council finds as follows:

1. The City Council desires to provide for the public safety, health and welfare of the residents by exercising its police power authority under Section 7 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Based on the findings and evidence set forth below, the City Council finds that the proliferation of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units in single family neighborhoods which may potentially result from SB 1123 projects presents an immediate threat to the public welfare within the City. This potential overdevelopment of single-family neighborhoods could negatively impact the community’s public health, safety and welfare, specifically, traffic safety, parking, fire access, and placing further strain on existing infrastructure (e.g. sewer systems, water).

2. The City’s accessory dwelling unit ordinance allows a maximum of one (1) accessory dwelling unit, either attached or detached, and one (1) junior accessory dwelling unit per property in all zones where single-family residential uses are allowed. Single family properties developed pursuant to SB 1123 could result in up to 10 accessory dwelling units and 10 junior accessory dwelling units on one (1) single family property, after being subdivided to create 10 lots. This type of development would not be consistent with the purpose and intent of the City’s

Urgency Ordinance 1341 Page 3
Interim Urgency ADU/JADU (SB 1123)
01171.0005 2194139.1
accessory dwelling unit ordinance. Therefore, this temporary moratorium is warranted to provide Staff with sufficient time to initiate an amendment to the San Dimas Municipal Code to codify the prohibition of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41, consistent with subsection of Government Code Section 66499.41.

3. The City Council finds that without such moratorium, density in single family neighborhoods can be significantly increased without proper planning to address impacts related to traffic, parking, public safety, fire access, and strain on existing infrastructure. Under the current San Dimas Municipal Code and existing State Housing legislation (SB 9), one single family property can be developed with up to four (4) units; two (2) main units, one (1) accessory dwelling unit and one (1) junior accessory dwelling unit. Single family properties developed pursuant to SB 1123 could be developed with up to 30 units, if subdivided to create 10 lots; one (1) main unit, one (1) accessory dwelling unit and one (1) junior accessory dwelling unit for each lot. What further exacerbates the concern is that SB 123 does not require a minimum lot size to be eligible for development. The City’s single-family lots, which average 7,000 square feet in lot size, were developed to support one (1) single family unit, and not up to 30 units if developed pursuant to SB 1123.

4. The City Council additionally finds that the moratorium to prohibit accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (SB 1123) would be in direct conflict with the City’s General Plan Land Use Goal L-1: Maintain the rural smalltown low-density atmosphere of San Dimas. SB 1123 developments with accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units would not be in compliance with the Goal’s objective of providing a community where residential uses are predominately low density and conserving existing residential neighborhoods. In addition, SB 1123 developments with accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units would be in conflict with Goal L-4 – Plan and create an urban form that efficiently utilizes urban infrastructure and services; Objective: Consider each development proposal in a larger development context.

Understand how each development contributes to certain capacity thresholds for circulation, community services and utilities.

5. The City Council finds that adopting the urgency ordinance is for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety of the residents of the City of San Dimas, as it ensures that the overdevelopment of single family neighborhoods does not occur, which could negatively impact the community’s the community’s public health, safety and welfare, specifically traffic safety, parking, fire access, and placing further strain on existing infrastructure (e.g. sewer systems, water).

SECTION 2. MORATORIUM IMPOSED. During the period of this Ordinance, accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units shall be prohibited on any lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero). The foregoing shall explicitly prohibit the issuance of any zoning approvals, building permits or any other applicable land use or zoning entitlement or approval of accessory dwelling units and junior

Urgency Ordinance 1341 Page 4
Interim Urgency ADU/JADU (SB 1123)
01171.0005 2194139.1
accessory dwelling units on parcels created or developed pursuant to SB 1123, notwithstanding other existing zoning provisions and regulations of the City.

The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide for the health, safety and welfare of the City and its residents by exercising the police power provided for in the California Constitution that underlies the City's zoning powers.

SECTION 3. COUNCIL DIRECTION; STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT. The City Council hereby directs City Staff, during the effective period of this Ordinance, to initiate an amendment to the San Dimas Municipal Code to codify the prohibition of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero). The written report required by Government Code Section 65858(d) shall be prepared by City Staff and issued no later than 10 days prior to the expiration of or extension of the Ordinance.

SECTION 4. AUTHORITY This Ordinance is adopted as an urgency measure pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 to protect the general safety, health and welfare by prohibiting accessory dwelling units or junior accessory dwelling units on parcels created or developed pursuant to SB 1123, as allowed per Government Code Section 66499.41(g).

SECTION 5. STATEMENT OF URGENCY. Based on the recitals and factual findings set forth in Section 1 above, which are hereby incorporated and deemed true and correct, this Ordinance is urgently needed for the immediate and long-term preservation of the public safety, health, and welfare. To enact this Ordinance after
giving notice, holding a public hearing, and two readings thereof, and thereafter wait thirty days for said ordinance to become effective, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, in that during the interim period, the possible development of SB 1123 projects could result in the proliferation of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units beyond what the City’s current accessory dwelling unit ordinance intended to allow. Such overdevelopment could negatively impact the community’s public health, safety and welfare, specifically traffic safety, parking, and fire access, and further strain existing infrastructure (e.g. sewer systems, water) meant to serve single family neighborhoods and not multi-family neighborhoods. The result of such development would be irreversible and could cause costly negative impacts in the community. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council.

SECTION 6. CEQA EXEMPTION. This Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which provides that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where, as here, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question would have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This Ordinance will temporarily reduce the possibility of any impacts on the environment by prohibiting the development of accessory dwelling units or junior accessory dwelling units on parcels created or developed pursuant to SB 1123, during the effective period of the Ordinance.

SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, phrase or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, then the City Council would have independently adopted the remaining provisions, sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, phrases or words of this Ordinance and as such they shall remain in full force and effect.

Urgency Ordinance 1341 Page 5
Interim Urgency ADU/JADU (SB 1123)
01171.0005 2194139.1
SECTION 8. SUPERSEDING OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. The provisions of this Ordinance hereby supersede the provisions of the San Dimas Municipal Code that are in conflict with this Ordinance.

SECTION 9. PUBLICATION.The City Clerk shall certify as to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law.

SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXPIRATION. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately and shall remain in effect for a period of forty-five (45) days, pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City Council by Government Code sections 36937 and 65858. This Ordinance shall be of no further force and effect forty-five (45) days following the date of its adoption unless extended in accordance with the provisions set forth in Government Code Section 65858.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas this 22nd day of September, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ __________________________________ Debra Black, MMC Jeff Malawy, City Attorney
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, do hereby certify that Ordinance 1341 was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 22nd day of September, 2026.
___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

ATTACHMENT 2
01171.0005 2194141.1
RESOLUTION 2026-63

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, EXPRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL’S DESIRE

TO PROHIBIT ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNITS ON LOTS CREATED OR DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66499.41 (SENATE BILL 1123,
CABALLERO). THIS ITEM IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(b)(3)
WHEREAS, the City of San Dimas (City), recognizes the importance of preserving existing single family neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance, which is codified at Chapter

18.38 of the San Dimas Municipal Code, allows a maximum of one accessory dwelling unit, either attached or detached, and one junior accessory dwelling unit per lot in all zones where singlefamily residential uses are allowed; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 684 (SB 684) was signed into law on October 11, 2023, which requires a ministerial process for subdivisions and housing development projects that can provide up to 10 new lots/residential units in multi-family zones; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1123 (SB 1123) was signed into law on September 19, 2024, which amended SB 684 to require a ministerial process for subdivisions and housing development projects that can provide up to 10 new lots/residential units in single family zones; and WHEREAS, projects in single family zones developed pursuant to SB 1123 could result in up to 10 residential units, 10 accessory dwelling units and 10 junior accessory dwelling units, for a total of 30 units on one single-family zoned property; and WHEREAS, SB 1123 projects with accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units could lead to the overdevelopment of neighborhoods developed to consist of single family residences, which could negatively impact the community’s public health, safety and welfare, specifically, traffic safety, parking, fire access, and placing further strain on existing infrastructure (e.g. sewer systems, water); and
WHEREAS, the City has received multiple inquiries about SB 1123 developments on single family zoned properties and approval of this Resolution would allow the City to apply the prohibition of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on such forthcoming applications; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41(g), a local agency is not required to permit an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit on parcels created pursuant to SB 1123; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which provides that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Where, as here, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question would have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Resolution 2026-63 Page 2
Prohibition of ADUs and JADUs on SB 1123 developments
September 22, 2026
01171.0005 2194141.1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Dimas that:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the recitals above are true and correct and hereby adopts the recitals as findings in furtherance of this Resolution.

SECTION 2. The City Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41(g), hereby prohibits the development of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on lots created or developed pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.41 (Senate Bill 1123, Caballero).

SECTION 3. The City Council desires to continue to implement the City’s Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance which allows a maximum of one accessory dwelling unit, either attached or detached, and one junior accessory dwelling unit per lot in all zones where single-family residential uses are allowed, and accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units developed pursuant to SB 1123 development would not be consistent with the purpose and intent of the City’s Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance.

SECTION 4. The City Council expresses that approving this Resolution is for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety of the residents of the City of San Dimas, as it ensures that the overdevelopment of single family neighborhoods does not occur, which could negatively impact the community’s public health, safety and welfare, specifically traffic safety, parking, fire access, and placing further strain on existing infrastructure (e.g. sewer systems, water).

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall attest and certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, the 22nd day of September, 2026. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, MMC
City Clerk

Resolution 2026-63 Page 3
Prohibition of ADUs and JADUs on SB 1123 developments
September 22, 2026
01171.0005 2194141.1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that Resolution 2026-63 was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 22nd , day of September, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, MMC
City Clerk

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Luis Torrico, Director of Community Development Subject: Discussion of Private Property Maintenance Standards ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
At the May 26, 2026, City Council meeting, the Council requested that an item be agendized to discuss the City’s options in mitigating public nuisance issues on private property arising from homelessness. This staff report provides a summary of the City’s role and responsibilities in managing maintenance and encampments on private property.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council receive and file.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
At the May 26, 2026, City Council meeting, the Council requested that Staff bring back a report to discuss the City’s options in mitigating public nuisance issues on private property arising from homelessness. This staff report provides a summary of the City’s, and more specifically, the Code Compliance Division’s role and responsibilities in managing maintenance, including landscaping, abandoned or unattended property, and encampments on private property.

Private Property Maintenance Standards Discussion Page 2 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The City of San Dimas Code Compliance Division is responsible for enforcing the City’s Municipal Code and other City regulations. These enforcement efforts support the proper maintenance of private property and help preserve the community’s overall appearance and quality of life.

Common property maintenance concerns include, but are not limited to, overgrown vegetation, dilapidated structures and fences, trash cans, inoperable or abandoned vehicles; unpermitted signs, work done without permits, abandoned or unattended property and homeless encampments on private property.

In every case, the City’s primary objective is to receive voluntary compliance. Code Compliance Staff typically attempt to contact the responsible party, explain the violation, and identify the corrective action required. If compliance is not achieved, a notice of violation is sent to the responsible party specifying a time frame to achieve compliance; time frames for compliance vary depending upon violation. If the violation remains unresolved, a second and final notice may be issued advising the responsible party that continued noncompliance may result in administrative citations, declaration of the property as a public nuisance, or additional enforcement remedies as required.

Community members may report potential Code violations by contacting City Hall or submitting a request through My San Dimas (GoGov), which provides residents the opportunity to request eligible services and report concerns through a computer or the mobile app. The app has a variety of topic areas such as graffiti, property maintenance, shopping carts and homeless issue/homeless encampments, which are automatically assigned to the appropriate City department.

More recently, Code Compliance have actively addressed homelessness related concerns, involving unattended or abandoned personal property, loitering or trespassing and encampments on private property. These issues are brought to light through the City’s GoGov platform, calls to City Hall and as observed by Code Compliance or other City employees/officials. While Code Compliance acts as the first point of contact, for non-emergency situations, they conduct an assessment to confirm each situation and determine if assistance is needed from the Sheriff’s Department Community Action Team (CAT) to ensure everyone’s safety. In addition, the City has an ordinance that provides enforcement tools to address camping and storage of personal property on private property. The ordinance prohibits camping on private property, with few exceptions such as camping within campgrounds licensed for camping activities and camping at the Girls Scouts property and prohibits loitering in close proximities to or obstructing building entrances or exits.

Unattended/abandoned property
When responding to reports of unattended or abandoned personal property, Code Compliance Staff first determine whether the items are located on private or public property, as the applicable removal procedures differ. For items located on private property, Staff contacts the property owner or property management company and request that the items be removed and properly disposed of. Property owners are not required to provide advance notice before removing unattended or abandoned property from their premises and may take immediate action upon receiving notification from the City. Code Compliance has established positive working relationships with the property management companies responsible for the City’s major commercial centers, which generally results in a prompt response and the timely removal of reported items. If the property is

Private Property Maintenance Standards Discussion Page 3 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
not removed within the timeframe provided by Staff, Code Compliance will proceed with the appropriate enforcement and compliance measures described above. Throughout this process, Code Compliance staff coordinate with responsible property owners and management companies, communicate applicable removal requirements and timeframes, and take additional enforcement action when voluntary compliance is not achieved. When unattended or abandoned property is located on public property, the City must follow a separate notification protocol by posting a written notice on or near the property stating that the items will be removed by the City within 24 hours.

Encampments
Code Compliance serves as the City’s primary point of contact for reports involving encampments and coordinates the appropriate response and cleanup efforts. When responding to reports of encampments, Code Compliance will first inspect the location to verify whether individuals are currently present at the encampment. This initial assessment helps Staff identify the responsible property owner or public agency and determine the appropriate next steps. If there are individuals present, Code Compliance will contact LA CADA, the City’s housing outreach coordinators. After services are either accepted or declined, Code Compliance will proceed with coordinating the removal of the encampment and associated debris with the property owner or governmental agency. Similar to unattended or abandoned property on private property, encampments on private property are the responsibility of the property owner and notices do not have to be posted for cleanup. After services have been offered, Code Compliance will contact the property owner or property management company to address the encampment. It should be noted that encampments are rarely identified within commercial centers or other private property. A majority of the encampments that the City has encountered have been located on Caltrans property. Over the past year, City staff has worked collaboratively with Caltrans, the California Highway Patrol, and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department to address encampments along the SR-57 and I-210 freeway corridors. During this time, Code Compliance Staff submitted more than 35 customer service requests to Caltrans, supporting coordinated clean-up activities that resulted in the removal of more than 45 encampments. These collaborative efforts have helped address potential public health and safety concerns, improve conditions within freeway right-of-way, and respond to ongoing community concerns.

Loitering/Trespass
Code Compliance also responds to calls related to individuals loitering, blocking access to businesses or trespassing on private property, but will typically do so with assistance from the Sheriff’s Department. In an effort to address these concerns, Code Compliance has worked with property owners from various businesses, shopping centers, and homeowners associations to submit and/or update Letters of Agency (LOA) to the Sheriff’s Department. The LOA allow deputies to address trespassing concerns more effectively. In addition, Staff continues to coordinate with Caltrans regarding needed fencing repairs along freeway-adjacent business properties to further support safety and discourage unauthorized access.

ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives are proposed for this item.

Private Property Maintenance Standards Discussion Page 4 For the Meeting of September 22, 2026

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Luis Torrico
Director of Community Development

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Joseph Jones, Recreation Manager
Subject: Discussion and Review of Incident/Accident Report Process for Kids Fun Club Program
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
At its meeting of August 11, 2026, the City Council requested that staff develop a written notification to hand to parents picking up their children from the City’s Kids Fun Club day camp program to notify them if their child was involved in any incidents or accidents.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council consider directing staff to continue the current practice of notifying parents or guardians verbally at pick up when their child has been involved in an incident or accident. Currently, staff documents the conversation with the parent or guardian on the Incident Report at pick up, ensuring that the notification is part of the official record. This approach reflects the current procedure and provides parents and guardians with timely information regarding their child’s involvement in an incident while maintaining a consistent process for documenting both the incidents and the related parental notification on the official Incident/Accident Report Form.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

Incident Reports Page 2
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026

BACKGROUND
The City operates the Kids Fun Club Program (”KFC”) for 10 weeks during the summer and for the weeks of spring vacation and winter vacation. The City operates the program at two sites, which include Marchant Park and Ladera Serra Park. A total of 100 youth are enrolled in the program during the summer, which operates Monday through Friday, from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

Weekly optional excursions are offered for an additional cost. The Parks and Recreation Department hires approximately 55 part-time staff to operate the camp. Staff receives training on applicable policies and procedures, first aid, CPR, concussion protocol, and strategies for supporting children on the autism spectrum. It is important to clarify that KFC is a recreational program and not intended to function as a school, or therapeutic program. Staff members are not professional teachers, therapists, or clinicians.

INCIDENT REPORTS
It is the City’s practice to follow a consistent process whenever a child in KFC experiences an incident or accident while at camp. This process is intended to ensure that incidents are properly documented, communicated to families in a timely manner, reviewed by supervisory staff, and maintained in accordance with City procedures. Incident reports are completed when a child exhibits behavior that requires intervention by camp staff. Behaviors that may trigger an incident report include frequent outbursts or physical confrontations with other campers. Copies of completed incident reports are available to parents upon request. Incident Reports can be requested via email or through the city’s website. Local municipalities including La Verne, Azusa, and Claremont practice the same method as San Dimas by providing verbal communication with parents at the time they pick up their children and completing some form of an incident report that is filed and made available upon request.

The first step is to complete an Incident Report documenting the circumstances surrounding the event. The report includes the location and time of the incident, a description of the environment, witnesses, individuals involved, and a detailed summary of what transpired.

When a child is injured or is not feeling well, the parent or guardian may be contacted immediately by telephone, depending on the circumstances. In other cases, the parent or guardian is notified of the child’s involvement in an incident at the time of pick up. Staff explains what occurred and documents the conversation on the Incident Report, including the time and manner in which the parent or guardian was notified. The report is signed by the staff member who completed it.

At the end of the day, the report is submitted to the Site Coordinator for review and signature. It is then forwarded to the Recreation Supervisor, Recreation Manager, and ultimately the Parks & Recreation Director for review. Once the review process is complete, the report is digitally scanned and retained in the City’s records and the original paper document is filed. This multilevel review process ensures that each Incident Report is thorough, legible, accurate, and easy to understand, while also providing appropriate oversight of incidents involving children in the City's care. Incident reports are also used to identify training topics and ensure that staff are following policies and procedures.

During the 10-week KFC program this summer, staff completed a total of 295 Incident/Accident Reports, averaging approximately 29.5 reports per week, or approximately 6 reports per day.

Incident Reports Page 3
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Over the past five years, the City has received three requests for Incident Reports involving KFC participants. The first request was denied because the individual making the request did not have legal custody of the child involved. The second request was granted due to a medical issue. The third request was granted because the parent wanted access to the incident reports. In the event that a request is submitted for an Incident Report, the request is processed through the City Clerk’s Office. The City Clerk and City Attorney review the report to determine whether information must be redacted. This review is particularly important when reports contain information concerning minors and any applicable redactions are made to protect the privacy and safety of the children and other individuals who may be identified in the report.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
When parents pick up their children from KFC, staff meets with the parent and explains the incident or accident involving their child. During this conversation, parents have the opportunity to ask questions and receive real-time clarification and feedback from staff who were involved or have knowledge of the incident. Parents may also verbally request a copy of the incident report, at this time. Once the conversation has concluded, staff adds a note to the incident report summarizing the parent’s response, including any questions, concerns, or relevant information shared during the discussion. At this point, the incident report is complete and is routed for signatures by the Coordinator, Supervisor, Recreation Manager, and Director of Parks & Recreation. If a request for the incident report is noted on the incident report, staff will contact the parent and provide guidance on how to submit a request through the City’s website. Once the request has been submitted, the request is reviewed based on the identity of the requester and the other individuals identified in the report. Depending on these factors, it may take approximately one to five business days for the request to be processed. Once the request has been approved and the report is ready for release, the parent who submitted the request receives a copy of the incident report from the City Clerk’s Office.

Staff is concerned that the completion of an additional document notifying parents that their child was involved in an incident duplicates the existing procedure of speaking directly with parents when they pick up their kids. Requiring duplicate documentation creates an additional administrative burden and does not provide additional substantive information when the incident, staff observations, and parent notification have already been documented and discussed with the parent.

Furthermore, as mentioned earlier in this report, there have only been three occasions in the past five years where the City has received a request for the incident/accident report. Staff is recommending to continue with the City’s existing process for documenting and communicating incidents involving participants in the Kids Fun Club (KFC) Program rather than requiring an additional written notification to parents for each incident.

The City currently has a comprehensive incident-reporting procedure designed to ensure that incidents are documented, communicated to parents or guardians, reviewed by supervisory staff, and retained in accordance with City procedures. When an incident occurs, staff complete an Incident/Accident Report documenting the circumstances, individuals involved, staff observations, and actions taken. Parents are then notified either immediately by telephone, when appropriate, or directly at the time of pick-up. Staff discuss the incident with the parent, answer questions, and document the parent’s response on the Incident Report. The report

Incident Reports Page 4
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
subsequently undergoes multiple levels of supervisory review before being retained in the City’s records.

This process provides both direct communication with parents and written documentation of the incident and notification. Parents also have an established process for obtaining a copy of an Incident Report through the City Clerk’s Office, subject to applicable legal requirements and privacy protections. The City Clerk and City Attorney review such requests and make any necessary redactions, particularly when reports involve minors or other individuals whose privacy and safety must be protected.

The existing process has been consistently implemented across the KFC Program. During the most recent 10-week summer program, approximately 295 Incident/Accident Reports were completed, averaging approximately 29.5 reports per week. Requiring an additional written notification for every incident would therefore create a significant additional administrative responsibility for staff. Staff believe that a separate notification form would largely duplicate information already contained in the Incident Report and the direct communication between staff and parents. Because the existing procedure already documents the incident, the notification provided to the parent, the parent’s response, and the subsequent supervisory review, an additional notification document would not provide a corresponding substantive benefit.

Maintaining the current process allows staff to focus resources on the safe and effective operation of the KFC Program while preserving accountability, transparency, and appropriate communication with parents. The existing multi-level review process also provides an established mechanism for identifying recurring issues, evaluating staff compliance with policies and procedures, and determining whether additional staff training is necessary.

For these reasons, staff recommends continuing the City’s existing incident-reporting and parent-notification procedures without adding a duplicative written notification requirement.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may wish to direct staff to provide parents or guardians with a brief written summary of the incident or accident involving their child. The notification would include a concise summary describing what occurred with their child, any immediate actions taken, and any relevant follow-up information. Attachment 2 of this report represents a draft of the written notice that could be provided to parents should the City Council wish to proceed in this manner.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,

Incident Reports Page 5
For the Meeting of September 22, 2026
Joseph Jones
Recreation Manager
Attachments:

1. Incident/Accident Report 2026

2. Draft Incident/Accident Summary Note

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT

INCIDENT/ACCIDENT REPORT
DATE: TIME: LOCATION:

TYPE OF ACTIVITY: YOUTH & ADULT SPORTS CONTRACT CLASSES SENIOR PROGRAMMING SPECIAL EVENT SCHOOL-AGE PROGRAMMING (KFC/TC) OTHER:

NAME OF INJURED PERSON: *AGE: M F
ADDRESS:

CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:

Phone #1: Phone #2:
*IF MINOR, PARENT/GUARDIAN INFORMATION. IF CONTACT INFO IS DIFFERENT, PLEASE COMPLETE FULLY.

NAME OF PARENT/GUARDIAN: AGE: M F
RELATIONSHIP TO INJURED PERSON:

ADDRESS:

CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:

Phone #1: Phone #2:

EXACT LOCATION WHERE OCCURRED:

WEATHER CONDITIONS: IF OTHER, PLEASE DESCRIBE:

DESCRIPTION OF WHAT OCCURED:

SPECIFIC NATURE & EXTENT OF INJURIES:

WITNESS: REPORTING: WITNESSED:

ACCIDENT REPORT

INCIDENT REPORT
*A MINOR CANNOT BE A WITNESS.

PARENT'S INFO IS SAME AS MINOR.

ATTACHMENT 1

ACTION TAKEN:

WAS FIRST AID ADMINISTERED: YES NO
DECRIBE FIRST AID THAT WAS ADMINISTERED:

INVOLVE EXPOSURE TO BLOOD OR BODILY FLUIDS? YES NO
WAS AN AUTOMATIC EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATOR (AED) USED: YES NO WAS ASSISTANCE REQUESTED: YES NO WHO RESPONDED: FIRE POLICE AMBULANCE OTHER IF MINOR, WAS THE PARENT/GUARDIAN NOTIFIED? YES NO BY WHOM:

HOW DID THE INJURED PARTICIPANT LEAVE THE AREA:

NAME OF EYEWITNESS: AGE: M F
ADDRESS:

CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:

Phone #1: Phone #2:

DATE COMPLETED/FILED:

REPORT FILED BY:

CLASSIFICATION:

SUPERVISOR SIGNATURE: DIRECTOR’S SIGNATURE:

How Incident Occured:

Camp Counselor Name:

Child’s Name:

My Injury:

What my Camp Counselor Did To Help Me:

Date:

City of San Dimas Accident Summary
ATTACHMENT 2