REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
Tuesday, June 2, 2026
5:00 PM CLOSED SESSION
5:30 BUDGET WORKSHOP
6:30 PM OPEN SESSION
COMMUNITY CENTER
625 S. PICO AVENUE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92583
951-487-7330
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 951-487-7330 ext. 339. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].
The City Council meeting may be observed either virtually by accessing the City’s website at https://horizon.agendalink.app/engage-v2/sanjacintoca/agendas and selecting the ‘Watch’ option for the applicable meeting, or in person at the San Jacinto Community Center.
Public Comments will only be accepted in person during the meeting or in writing to the City Clerk no later than 3:00 PM on the day of the meeting. Participants viewing the Livestream will not have a comment option.
Written public comments may only be submitted via email to [email protected] or by hard copy to the Office of the City Clerk at 595 S. San Jacinto Ave., San Jacinto, CA 92583, no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Please identify the agenda item number and “PUBLIC COMMENT” in the subject line of the email or hard copy document. All written correspondence received by the 3:00 p.m. deadline will be distributed to the legislative body prior to the meeting and retained with the official meeting record. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern in-person speaker comments at the Council meeting.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk will read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Council meeting.
The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Council meeting.
1. ORGANIZATION
1.1 Public Comments on Closed Session Items
CRYSTAL RUIZ, MAYOR
CLARISA SANCHEZ, MAYOR PRO TEM
PHIL AYALA, COUNCILMEMBER
ALONSO LEDEZMA, COUNCILMEMBER
VALERIE VANDEVER, COUNCILMEMBER
1.2 Closed Session
1.21. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Title: City Manager
1.2.2. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT APPOINTMENT
Title: City Manager
1.3 Closed Session Report
1.4 Budget Workshop
1.5 Roll Call
1.6 Invocation
1.7 Pledge of Allegiance
1.8 Special Presentation(s)
— National Police Week Proclamation
— Recognition of Military Explorers for Community Volunteerism
1.9 Mayor/Council Member Reports
1.10 Late Items
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. City Council
A1. Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinace(s), and Reading by Title Only A2. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 5, 2026 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of May 7, 2026.
A3. Resolution Adding Limited Term Position and Approving Second Amendment to Employment Agreement with Robert A. Johnson
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
— 1. Adopt a Resolution No. 4126 Adding the Limited Term Position of Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council to the Citywide Salary Schedule. — 2. Approve the Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement with Robert A. Johnson and authorize the Mayor to execute the Second Amendment in substantially the form presented, subject to any minor, non-substantive revisions approved by the City Attorney.
A4. Annual Proceedings for Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 (LLPD No. 1) – Initiation and Intent to Levy Assessments for Fiscal Year 2026–2027
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
— 1) Adopt Resolution 4125 initiating proceedings and ordering the Assessment District Engineer to prepare and file the Engineer’s Report for LLPD No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2026–2027, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §22622 — 2)Adopt Resolution 4126 declaring the City’s intent to levy and collect assessments within LLPD No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2026–2027, accepting the Engineer’s Report, and setting June 16, 2026, as the date of the public hearing to consider the annual levy.
A5. Annual Proceedings for Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) – Initiation and Intent to Levy Assessments for FY 2026–2027
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
— 1) Adopt Resolution 4127 to initiate proceedings and direct the Assessment District Engineer to prepare and file the Engineer’s Report for LLPD No. 2 for FY 2026–2027, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §22622 — 2) Adopt Resolution 4128 to accept the Engineer’s Report, declare the City’s intent to levy and collect assessments for FY 2026–2027, and set June 16, 2026, as the date of the public hearing A6. The Thomsen Company, Inc. Professional Services Agreement EWA 13 for San Jacinto MDP Line E-2 Storm Drain Improvement Project (CIP# 15-003)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions:
— 1. APPROVE the professional services agreement to The Thomsen Company, Inc. for the sum of $19,675; — 2. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute the professional services agreement.
A7. Tri-Party Cooperative Agreement Between Riverside County Transportation Commission, County of Riverside, and City of San Jacinto for Ramona Expressway Reconstruction Project Between Warren Road and Sanderson Avenue (CIP# 26-007)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions:
— 1. APPROVE as to form Cooperative Agreement No. 26-31-001-00; — 2. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute the cooperative tri-party agreement between Riverside County Transportation Commission, County of Riverside, and the City of San Jacinto (Agreement No. 26-31-001-00) upon further review by City Attorney.
A8. Cooperative Agreement Between Riverside County Transportation Commission and the City of San Jacinto for Construction of Mid County Parkway Project - Construction Contract 3 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions:
— 1. APPROVE as to form Cooperative Agreement No. 25-31-094-00; — 2. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute the cooperative agreement between Riverside County Transportation Commission and the City of San Jacinto (Agreement No. 25-31-094-00) upon further review by City Attorney.
A9. Professional Services Agreement for a Comprehensive Update to the City’s Landscape, Irrigation, Park, Basin, Parkway and Street Tree Design Standards
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. APPROPRIATE an additional $100,000 from the City’s unallocated General Fund balance for the preparation of updated Citywide Landscape, Irrigation, Park, Basin, Parkway and Street Tree Design Standards;
2. AUTHORIZE the transfer of the previously budgeted $80,000 for Landscape Design Guideline updates in the Planning Division FY 2025/2026 budget, together with the additional appropriation, into CIP Project No. 26-013, Fund 199-9999-425.40-01;
3. AWARD a Professional Services Agreement to Community Works Design Group in the amount of $159,615.00 for professional consulting services associated with the preparation of the updated standards;
4. REJECT all other proposals; and
5. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement and all related contract documents.
A10. City Net PSA Renewal for Street Outreach and Emergency Shelter City Net PSA Renewal for Street Outreach and Emergency Shelter — 1. Approve the FY 2026-2027 Professional Services Agreement with City Net to provide comprehensive street outreach and emergency hotel services, and
— 2. Authorize the City Manager or their designee to sign the agreement.
4. PUBLIC HEARING
4.1 Sixth Amendment to the CR&R Solid Waste Franchise Agreement and Annual Rate Adjustment Staff recommends that the City Council :
— 1. Conduct a public hearing to receive public comment and accept any protests. — 2. Adopt Resolution No. 4129 - Approving the Sixth Amendment to the Franchise Agreement between the City of San Jacinto and CR&R Incorporated.
5. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. City Council
A1. FY 26/27 Capital Improvement Program Engineering Update RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file an update of the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 26/27.
A2. Revision to Line E of the San Jacinto Valley Master Drainage Plan RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions:
— 1. DETERMINE that, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, that the proposed Addendum to the previously adopted Environmental Impact Report for the San Jacinto Valley Master Drainage Plan (MDP) adequately addresses the Revision to Line E of the MDP, and that no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required because the revision to Line E would not result in new or more significant environmental impacts than those previously analyzed and no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred that would create new or more significant environmental impacts.
— 2. APPROVE the revision to Line E of the San Jacinto Valley Master Drainage Plan, in conformance with the Preliminary Design Report.
— 3. 3. Direct Staff to revise the San Jacinto Valley Master Drainage Plan Map to reflect the modifications in the Preliminary Design Report.
6. CITY MANAGER UPDATE
7. FUTURE REQUESTS FROM CITY COUNCIL TO CITY MANAGER
8. CLOSED SESSION
8.1 Closed Session
9.1.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: 1 Case – Wright Construction Engineering Corp. v. City of San Jacinto, Government Code Claim dated March 23, 2026.
9. ADJOURNMENT
DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS (SB343) - Any public record, relating to an open session agenda item, that is distributed within 72 hours prior to the meeting is available for public inspection at the public counter located in the Administration Building of City Hall, 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583.
I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this May 28, 2026 as requested by law.
____________________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
Date Posted: May 28, 2026
Proclamation
Of The City of San Jacinto
National Police Week
May 10 – 16, 2026
WHEREAS, National Police Week provides an opportunity for communities across the nation to recognize and honor the dedicated men and women of law enforcement who courageously serve and protect their communities each day; and WHEREAS, peace officers play a vital role in preserving public safety, protecting life and property, and upholding the laws and constitutional rights of all citizens; and
WHEREAS, law enforcement officers demonstrate courage, professionalism, integrity, and an unwavering commitment to public service, often placing themselves in harm’s way in service to others; and
WHEREAS, Congress and the President of the United States have designated May 10 through May 16, 2026, as National Police Week, and May 15, 2026, as Peace Officers Memorial Day; and
WHEREAS, Peace Officers Memorial Day honors those officers who have made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty and recognizes the families, friends, and colleagues they leave behind; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto recognizes and appreciates the dedication and sacrifice of all law enforcement personnel who faithfully serve the community; and WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto is committed to honoring the service and sacrifices of law enforcement officers and remembering those who have lost their lives in the line of duty.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of San Jacinto hereby recognizes May 10 through May 16, 2026, as “National Police Week” and May 15, 2026, as “Peace Officers Memorial Day” in honor of the dedicated service, courage, and sacrifice of law enforcement officers throughout the nation.
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
Valerie Vandever, Councilmember Alonso Ledezma, Councilmember Clarisa Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tem Phil Ayala, Councilmember June 2, 2026
TO: City Council
REQUESTED
BY:
Jill Theriot, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED
BY:
Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 5, 2026 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of May 5, 2026.
Attachments
May_5_2026_City_Council_Regular_Meeting_Minutes.pdf
City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes May 5, 2026
CRYSTAL RUIZ, MAYOR
CLARISA SANCHEZ, MAYOR PRO TEM
PHIL AYALA, COUNCILMEMBER
VALERIE VANDEVER, COUNCILMEMBER
ALONSO LEDEZMA, COUNCILMEMBER
ACTION MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 5, 2026
5:00 PM CLOSED SESSION
5:30 PM AGENDALINK TRAINING WORKSHOP
6:30 PM OPEN SESSION
LIVE STREAM LINK: https://vimeo.com/user115670369
COMMUNITY CENTER
625 S. PICO AVENUE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92583
951-487-7330
1. ORGANIZATION
Mayor Crystal Ruiz called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
1.1. Public Comments on Closed Session
1.2. Closed Session
1.2.1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: City Manager
1.2.2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Craig Hayes, City Attorney Unrepresented employee: City Manager
1.3. Closed Session Report
City Attorney Craig Hayes indicated that there was no reportable action from the Closed Session.
1.4. AgendaLink Training Workshop
IT Supervisor Jessica Mendez conducted an AgendaLink agenda management software training workshop for the City Council.
1.5. Roll Call
Deputy City Clerk Jill Theriot conducted the roll call:
City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes May 5, 2026
Present: Mayor Crystal Ruiz, Mayor Pro Tem Clarisa Sanchez, Councilmember Phil Ayala, Councilmember Valerie Vandever
Absent: Councilmember Alonso Ledezma
M/S/C (Ayala/Sanchez) to approve the absence of Councilmember Ledezma. Motion carried 4/0.
Ayes: Vandever, Ayala, Sanchez, Ruiz
Nays: None
Absent: Ledezma
Abstain: None
1.6. Invocation
Councilmember Vandever gave the invocation.
1.7. Pledge of Allegiance
Councilmember Ayala led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1.8. Special Presentations
1.8.1. Employee of the Month Recognition for April
1.8.2. Nominator of the Month Recognition for April
1.8.3. Recognition SJHS Lady Tigers Girls Soccer Team - CIF SS & CIF State Finalists
1.8.4. National Public Works Week Proclamation
1.8.5. Mental Health Awareness Month Proclamation
1.9. Mayor/Council Member Reports
Councilmembers provided their reports.
1.10. Late Items
There were no late items.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were three (3) public comments:
• Marianne
• Lynn Peterson
• Greg Langworthy
City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes May 5, 2026
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
3.A. Consent Calendar - City Council
3.A.1. Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading by Title Only
3.A.2. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of April 7, 2026/City Clerk/Approved
3.A.3. Treasurer’s Report at January 31, 2026/Finance/Approved
3.A.4. Treasurer’s Report at February 28, 2026/Finance/Approved
3.A.5. Treasurer’s Report at March 31, 2026/Finance/Approved
3.A.6. Report - Use of ARPA Funds CY 26 Q1/Finance/Approved
3.A.7. Notice of Intent to Conduct a Public Hearing Regarding Proposed Water and Wastewater Rate Adjustments/Finance/Approved
3.A.8. SB1 – Resolution No. 4120 Adopting Fiscal Year 2026/27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Projects/Engineering/Approved
3.A.9. Inland Foundation Engineering Professional Services Agreement for Esplanade Avenue Widening, Phase 1 Warren Road to Sanderson Avenue (CIP# 06- 145)/Engineering/Approved
3.A.10.Cooperative Agreement Between City of Hemet and City of San Jacinto for Esplanade Avenue Widening Phase 1 Warren Road to Sanderson Avenue (CIP#06-145)/Engineering/Approved
3.A.11.Road Closures for the Construction of Esplanade Avenue Widening Phase 1, Warren Road to Sanderson Avenue (CIP# 06-145)/Engineering/Approved
3.A.12.CSA 152 – Adoption of Resolution No. 4114, Maintaining BAU for FY2026-2027 and FY2027-28/Storm/Approved
3.A.13.Fifth Amendment to City Attorney Legal Services Agreement/City Manager/Approved
3.A.14.Resolution No. 4117, in Support of Preserving and Conserving the Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail/City Manager/Approved
City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes May 5, 2026 M/S/C (Vandever/Sanchez) moved to approve the consent calendar. Motion carried 4/0.
Ayes: Ayala, Sanchez, Vandever, Ruiz
Nays: None
Absent: Ledezma
Abstain: None
4. DISCUSSION ITEMS
4.1. Annual Financial Report, SAS 114 Report, and GAS Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025
Finance Director Kimberly Ganimian presented the staff report.
City Council received and filed the Annual Financial Report, SAS 114 Report, and GAS Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025.
4.2. Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Rancho San Jacinto, Phase 2) Special Tax Bonds Refunding
Deputy City Manager Tom Prill presented the staff report.
M/S/C (Ruiz/Ayala) made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 4119, approving the issuance of the City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Rancho San Jacinto, Phase 2) 2026 Special Tax Refunding Bonds (the “Refunding Bonds”).
Motion carried 4/0.
Ayes: Vandever, Sanchez, Ayala, Ruiz
Nays: None
Absent: Ledezma
Abstain: None
4.3. Approval of Resolution Adopting SB 707 Disruption of Telephonic of Internet Service Policy
City Attorney Craig Hayes presented the staff report.
M/S/C (Ayala/Vandever) made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 4121, approving SB 707 Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service Policy. Motion carried 4/0.
Ayes: Vandever, Sanchez, Ayala, Ruiz
Nays: None
Absent: Ledezma
Abstain: None
5. FUTURE REQUESTS FROM CITY COUNCIL TO CITY MANAGER
City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes May 5, 2026
6. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business before the City Council, Mayor Ruiz adjourned the meeting at 7:57 p.m.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
____________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Jill Theriot, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as read:
Approved as amended:
June 2, 2026
TO: City Council
REQUESTED
BY:
Craig Hayes, City Attorney
APPROVED
BY:
Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Resolution Adding Limited Term Position and Approving Second Amendment to Employment Agreement with Robert A. Johnson
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 4124 - Adding the Limited Term Position of Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council to the Citywide Salary Schedule.
2. Approve the Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement with Robert A. Johnson and authorize the Mayor to execute the Second Amendment in substantially the form presented, subject to any minor, nonsubstantive revisions approved by the City Attorney.
DISCUSSION:
Resolution No. 4124 would add the limited-term position of Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council to the Citywide Salary Schedule at a fixed monthly pay rate. The position is a limited term, at will, unrepresented, City Council appointed position outside the competitive service, subject to the applicable employment agreement approved by the City Council. The City classifies the position as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, subject to applicable law. California Code of Regulations, title 2, section 570.5 requires CalPERS reportable pay rate to be listed on a publicly available pay schedule approved by the governing body, identifying the position title, pay rate, time base, effective date, revision date, and other required information.
In 2017, the City hired Robert A. Johnson to serve as City Manager under an employment agreement. On July 1, 2024, the City entered into a new employment agreement with Robert A. Johnson to continue to serve as City Manager through June 30, 2028 (“Employment Agreement”).
The Employment Agreement sets forth the City Manager’s duties, compensation, benefits, term, termination provisions, and other terms and conditions of employment. Mr. Johnson has notified the City Council of his desire to retire from his position as City Manager and, for a limited transition period, continue serving the City in an executive and advisory capacity. The proposed Second Amendment would memorialize that transition and provide for Mr. Johnson’s employment as Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council upon the City Council appointing an interim City Manager and through December 31, 2026.
The duties of the Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council are set forth in Exhibit “A” to the Second Amendment. In general, those duties include assisting with San Jacinto Power operations and related energy programs, assisting with transition-related matters, and continuing to support certain economic development and City property development efforts.
The Second Amendment provides that Mr. Johnson would not be entitled to any cost-of-living adjustment, annual salary adjustment, merit increase, market adjustment, or other increase in base salary during the transition period unless expressly approved by the City Council in a subsequent written amendment. During the transition period, Mr. Johnson’s base salary would remain Twenty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars and Fifty Cents ($27,528.50) per month.
The Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council is established by Resolution No. 4124, the compensation set forth in the Second Amendment matches the rate adopted in the Salary Schedule, and the City Council finds the consideration the City is receiving is commensurate with the compensation.
The Brown Act requires that prior to taking final action, the City Council shall orally report a summary of a recommendation for executive salary. The City Attorney will therefore provide an oral report of the proposed adjustment at the meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
During the transition period, Mr. Johnson’s base salary would remain $27,528.50 per month, and his compensation and benefits would remain as provided in the Employment Agreement, as amended. The City also receives compensation in the amount of $12,000.00 per month from CalChoice for Mr. Johnson’s work with CalChoice. This will partially offset Mr. Johnson’s salary.
Attachments
Resolution No. 4124 - Resolution Establishing Position and Salary Schedule.pdf 2024 City Manager Employment Agreement (Robert Johnson).pdf 1st Amendment to City Manager Contract (July 2025)-c1.pdf 2nd_Amendment_to_City_Manager_Contract-c1.pdf
24438.00000\45050651.1
Resolution No. 4124
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 4123
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, ADDING THE LIMITED TERM POSITION OF EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR OF SAN JACINTO POWER AND SPECIAL ADVISOR TO THE
CITY COUNCIL TO THE CITYWIDE SALARY SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto is a general law city organized under the laws of the State of California;
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved or is considering approval of a second amendment to the City Manager Employment Agreement providing for a limited transition services period during which the incumbent will serve in the position of Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to add that limited term position to the Citywide Salary Schedule at a fixed monthly pay rate;
WHEREAS, California Code of Regulations, title 2, section 570.5 requires CalPERS reportable pay rate to be listed on a publicly available pay schedule approved by the governing body, identifying the position title, pay rate, time base, effective date, revision date, and other required information;
WHEREAS, before taking final action, the City Council will orally report a summary of the recommended final action on the salary, salary schedule, and any fringe benefits for the position as required by Government Code section 54953, subdivision (d)(3); and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the position, compensation, and related transition services serve a legitimate public purpose and are in the best interests of the City and its residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows:
Section 1. Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution as findings of the City Council.
Section 2. Salary Schedule Amendment. The Citywide Salary Schedule is amended to add the limited term position of Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council at the pay rate and time base shown in Exhibit A. The amendment is effective as of the date of adoption of this Resolution, unless Exhibit A states a later effective date.
Section 3. Position Status. The position is a limited term, at will, unrepresented, Council appointed position outside the competitive service, subject to the applicable employment agreement approved by the City Council. The City classifies the position as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, subject to applicable law. Nothing in this Resolution authorizes the incumbent to exercise City Manager authority after the transition date, or authorizes any individual City Council member to direct City staff except as permitted by law.
24438.00000\45050651.1
Resolution No. 4124
Section 4. Term. The position is authorized through December 31, 2026, unless earlier ended or later extended by subsequent City Council action in open session and reflected in the applicable employment agreement or other City records.
Section 5. CalPERS Reporting. The City Manager or Interim City Manager, Finance Director, and other appropriate City staff are directed to report compensation paid for the position to CalPERS only to the extent permitted by the Public Employees Retirement Law, CalPERS regulations, and other applicable law. Nothing in this Resolution characterizes as compensation earnable, pensionable compensation, or reportable compensation any amount that does not qualify under applicable law.
Section 6. Posting and Retention. The City Clerk is directed to post the amended Citywide Salary Schedule on the City website, make it available for public review during normal business hours, and retain it with all required revision records for not less than five years.
Section 7. Public Purpose. The City Council finds that the position and compensation serve a legitimate public purpose, are commensurate with the duties to be performed, and do not constitute a gift of public funds under Article XVI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
Section 8. CEQA. This Resolution is an administrative personnel action and is not a project under CEQA Guidelines section 15378, subdivision (b)(5). To the extent it is a project, it is exempt under CEQA Guidelines section 15061, subdivision (b)(3).
Section 9. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
___________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
___ _ ___
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Best, Best & Krieger LLP
___ _____
Craig Hayes, City Attorney
24438.00000\45050651.1
Resolution No. 4124
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
CITYWIDE SALARY SCHEDULE AMENDMENT
Adopted Pursuant to Resolution No. 4124
This Salary Schedule Amendment is intended to satisfy California Code of Regulations, title 2, section 570.5. The City Clerk shall insert the actual date of adoption before posting the final Citywide Salary Schedule.
Position Title Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council
Classification Status Limited term; at will; Council appointed; outside competitive service; unrepresented
FLSA Status Exempt, subject to applicable law
Pay Rate $27,528.50 per month, fixed rate
Time Base Monthly, payable on the City regular payroll cycle Annualized Rate $330,342.00, for reference only
Effective Date June 2, 2026
Date of Revision Initial adoption
Adopting Authority City Council Resolution No. 2026-____ Authorized Term Through December 31, 2026, unless extended by City Council action
24438.00000\42409265.1
- 1 -
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
CITY MANAGER
THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into as of July 1, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), between the City of San Jacinto, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California (“City”) and Robert A. Johnson (“City Manager” or “Employee”). City and City Manager are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. City and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2019, where Employee agreed to serve as City Manager of City, which was amended four times and terminates June 30, 2025 (collectively, the “Original Agreement”).
B. City and Employee now desire to enter into this Agreement, which shall terminate the Original Agreement on the Effective Date of this Agreement and supersede the Original Agreement.
I. TERM
The City hereby employs the Employee as City Manager commencing on July 1, 2024, and continuing through June 30, 2028 (“Term”). Upon expiration of this Term, this Agreement shall automatically renew for a period of one (1) year unless written notice expressing one Party’s intention to terminate this Agreement is provided to the other Party by June 30, 2027.
Following this initial automatic renewal period, this Agreement shall be automatically renewed for additional one-year periods on an ongoing basis unless written notice expressing one Party’s intention to terminate this Agreement is provided to the other Party no less than one year prior to the expiration of whichever one year period is in effect at that time.
II. SALARY
Employee shall be entitled to no salary or compensation (other than the fringe benefits set forth in Section IX below) except as stated in this Section II as follows:
Employee’s base salary shall be $25,255.50 per month, effective July 1, 2024. Employee shall be compensated on a pro rata basis of his base salary for the first and last months of his employment. Employee shall be paid pursuant to the procedures regularly established and as they may be amended by the City in its sole discretion.
On about July 1, 2025, and on each anniversary thereafter, the City Council shall consider, and when warranted award the Employee, an annual salary increase. Such increase shall be awarded at the City Council’s discretion, based on the City Council’s most recent personnel evaluation of Employee. Any salary increase shall be conditioned on the City Council’s most recent personnel evaluation resulting in a finding that Employee has satisfactorily DocuSign Envelope ID: AB8EC064-CFCB-4EA0-8FB7-D50EEB3D677E 24438.00000\42409265.1
- 2 -
performed all job duties. Each annual salary increase may be up to four (4) percent of Employee’s base salary at the time of such evaluation.
Employee shall receive a yearly Cost of Living Adjustment (“COLA”) of five (5) percent each City fiscal year.
Annual adjustments to salary shall be effective as of July 1 of the respective year of the adjustment. The annual adjustment shall not be implemented unless set forth in a written amendment to this Agreement, signed by both parties, that the City Council duly approves in an open session.
III. DUTIES
Employee shall perform the duties of the City Manager as prescribed by Section 2.12.060 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code. In addition to the powers and duties set forth in the Municipal Code, the City Manager shall have such powers and duties which are delegated to him by the City Council. The City Manager shall execute all powers and duties in accordance with the policies adopted by the City Council and the State of California Government Code.
IV. CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL RESPONSIBILITIES
The City Manager shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the City. As such, the City Manager shall have the responsibility for implementing City Council policy, whereas the City Council shall retain the responsibility for formulating and adopting said policy.
The City Council and its members shall deal with the administrative services of the City only through the Employee, except for the purpose of inquiry. Neither the City Council nor any member thereof shall give orders to any subordinate of the Employee. Employee shall take direction only from a majority of the City Council as expressed at a duly noticed Brown Act meeting. Employee shall not be required to take direction from individual City Councilmembers or less than a majority of Councilmembers.
V. OTHER DUTIES
The City Manager (or his designee) shall: (1) review all policies proposed to the City Council and make appropriate recommendations to the Council; (2) periodically evaluate employees as provided for by California law and City policy; (3) advise the Council of possible sources of funds that might be available to implement present or contemplated City programs or services; (4) maintain and improve his professional competence by available means, including subscription to and reading of appropriate periodicals, and joining and participating in appropriate professional associations and their activities; (5) establish and maintain an appropriate community relations program; and (6) serve as liaison between the Council and as its designated representative with respect to all employer-employee matters, and make recommendations to the Council concerning those matters. Notwithstanding that a designee of the City Manager may perform said duties, the City Manager shall be the person ultimately DocuSign Envelope ID: AB8EC064-CFCB-4EA0-8FB7-D50EEB3D677E 24438.00000\42409265.1
- 3 -
responsible to the Council for the proper implementation of the duties and responsibilities described in this Agreement.
VI. OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
The Employee may undertake outside professional activities for compensation, including consulting, teaching, training, speaking and writing provided they do not interfere with Employee's normal duties and are done only during non-business hours, personal leave or holiday time of Employee and are not done with any existing vendors or contractors of the City.
Under no circumstances shall such outside activities create a conflict of interest with the duties of the City Manager and the interests of the City.
VII. EVALUATION
Employee shall meet with the City Council in closed session annually, beginning on or about July 1, 2025, to review the Employee's performance and to discuss the City Council's evaluation of said performance. It shall be Employee’s obligation to remind City Council of the need to conduct this annual performance evaluation. Additional closed sessions may be scheduled at the direction of the City Council to discuss the Employee’s performance as deemed necessary by the City Council.
VIII. TERMINATION
The Employee shall serve at the will and pleasure of the City Council and may be removed from office (terminated) at any time for any reason or no reason upon a majority vote of the City Council. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the City Council from terminating this Agreement and the services of the Employee at its sole discretion.
A. Termination without Cause
(i) Termination with Advance Notice. In the event Employee is terminated by the City without cause during the term of this Agreement, during which time Employee is willing and able to perform his duties under this Agreement, the City shall provide Employee with sixty (60) days’ written notice prior to the effective date of termination. Upon termination, City shall provide Employee with: (1) twelve (12) months’ salary; and (2) continuation of all existing health benefits currently offered the Employee, for the lesser of twelve (12) months or until Employee finds other employment, whichever occurs first. The salary and benefits shall be referred to collectively as “Severance Pay.” (ii) Termination without Advance Notice. In lieu of termination with notice as set forth in Subsection (i) above, the City may immediately terminate Employee from his employment without advance notice, in which case the Severance Pay shall be (1) twelve (12) months’ salary; and (2) continuation of all existing health benefits currently offered the Employee, for the lesser of twelve (12) months or until Employee finds other employment, whichever occurs first.
DocuSign Envelope ID: AB8EC064-CFCB-4EA0-8FB7-D50EEB3D677E 24438.00000\42409265.1
- 4 -
(iii) In exchange for Severance Pay under either Subsections (i) or (ii) above, the Employee hereby expressly waives any right he may have under any applicable law, City policy, or otherwise to appeal or grieve his termination and the terms of this Agreement.
B. Termination for Cause
In the event that it is determined that the Employee has been terminated for cause, the Employee shall not be entitled to any Severance Pay. Termination shall be “for cause” if Employee: (i) acts in bad faith and to the detriment of the City; (ii) refuses or fails to act in accordance with any specific direction or order of the City Council; (iii) exhibits misconduct or dishonesty in regard to his employment or v) is determined to have mislead the City Council or engaged in any dishonesty during the application process or his interview with the City Council prior to his appointment as City Manager; (v) engages or is found to have engaged in any misconduct outside of his employment with the City that materially impacts the City’s reputation; or (vi) is convicted of either a misdemeanor that materially impacts the City’s reputation or Employee’s ability to perform his duties or felony crime. The removal of the Employee from office pursuant to this paragraph shall be only on a majority vote of the whole City Council. In case of his intended removal, the Employee shall be furnished with a written notice stating the City Council's intention to remove him and the reasons therefore, at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of removal. Within seven (7) days after the furnishing of the Employee of such notice, he may, by writing, addressed to the City Council and delivered to the City Clerk, request a hearing before the City Council. Thereupon, the Mayor shall fix a time for such public hearing. Such hearing shall be held at the usual meeting place of the City Council, before the expiration of the aforesaid thirty (30) day period and the Employee shall attend and be heard. After furnishing the Employee with written notice of his intended removal from office, the City Council may suspend him from further duty, but his compensation shall continue until his removal by motion of the City Council, duly made and passed following the close of the public hearing. This Section VIII of this Agreement is mutually agreed to by the City Council and Employee in lieu of Municipal Code sections 2.12.080(B), pursuant to San Jacinto Municipal Code section 2.12.100.
C. Resignation
If Employee desires to resign from his position, he will provide the City Council with at least sixty (60) calendar days' notice, in writing. In the event that the Employee resigns from his employment with the City, the Employee shall not be entitled to any Severance Pay.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Employee desires to resign from his position after July 1, 2025, Employee may request to stay employed with the City for a six (6) month period and help the City Council transition to a new city manager. In that case, the City will provide Employee with: (1) six (6) months’ salary; and (2) continuation of all existing health benefits currently offered the Employee. In exchange, the City Council may request City Manager to perform the following tasks: (1) choose an interim city manager to run the day to day operations of the City; and/or (2) run the city manager recruitment for a new, permanent city manager. During this six (6) month period, Employee will not be in the office at City Hall, but will be available on an as needed basis for consultation with the interim city manager, City DocuSign Envelope ID: AB8EC064-CFCB-4EA0-8FB7-D50EEB3D677E 24438.00000\42409265.1
- 5 -
Council, and/or city attorney, either at City Hall, by video, or at another location. If appropriate, the City Council may allow and pay for Employee to attend annual conferences such as Cal Cities, SCAG, ICSC, etc.
D. Abuse of Office
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 53243, 53243.1 and 53243.2, if City Manager is convicted of a crime involving an abuse of his office or position, all of the following shall apply:
(1) if City Manager is provided with administrative leave pay pending an investigation, City Manager shall be required to fully reimburse City such amounts paid; (2) if City pays for the criminal legal defense of City Manager (which would be in its sole discretion, as it is generally not obligated to pay for a criminal defense), City Manager shall be required to fully reimburse City such amounts paid; and (3) if this Agreement is terminated, any Severance Pay and Severance Benefits related to the termination that City Manager may receive from City shall be fully reimbursed to City or void if not yet paid to City Manager. For purposes of this Section, abuse of office or position means either: (1) an abuse of public authority, including waste, fraud, and violation of the law under color of authority; or (2) a crime against public justice, including, but not limited to, a crime described in Title 7 (commencing with Section 92) of Part 1 of the Penal Code. In addition to the salary and compensation in Section II, above, Employee shall be entitled only to the following fringe benefits:
IX. FRINGE BENEFITS
In addition to the salary and compensation in Section II, above, Employee shall be entitled only to the following fringe benefits:
A. Time Off
Employee shall be provided with paid time off as follows:
(i) Vacation time to be accrued on a pro rata basis each pay period at the rate of 160 hours per year.
(ii) Sick Leave accruing on a pro rata basis each pay period at a rate of 96 hours per year. Sick leave may accrue up to a maximum of 960 hours. Upon completion of two years of service with the City, Employee may sell back to the City up to 96 hours of sick leave at the end of each calendar year, provided that after selling back any sick leave, Employee still retains a balance of 100 hours.
(iii) Management leave accruing on a pro rata basis each pay period at a rate of 96 hours per year, which is in addition to sick leave and vacation time. Management leave time carries over for twelve (12) months and if not used during that period or the subsequent year, it expires. It may not be cashed out upon separation from employment. (iv) Paid holidays as follows: New Year's Day, President's Day, Martin Luther King Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, DocuSign Envelope ID: AB8EC064-CFCB-4EA0-8FB7-D50EEB3D677E 24438.00000\42409265.1
- 6 -
Thanksgiving Friday, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, and for each six month period or portion thereof one (1) floating holiday.
B. Retirement
Employee shall be enrolled in the City’s retirement program through CalPERS consistent with the City’s existing contract with CalPERS for such benefits and applicable law.
In this regard, it is understood that Employee will be a “classic” CalPERS member under Tier II of the City’s contract with CalPERS, which provides for a retirement formula of 2% at 55.
If Employee elects to participate in City’s deferred compensation plan, City will match the Employee’s annual contribution effective July 1, 2024.
C. Health/Dental/Vision Insurance
Employee shall be eligible to enroll in the City’s health, dental, and vision plans to the same extent as and under the same terms of other management employees.
D. Cafeteria Benefit (Non-Health)
Employee shall be entitled to participate in the non-health cafeteria benefit to the extent and under the same rules that said benefit is also provided to management employees.
E. Life Insurance
The City shall provide employee with life insurance to the same extent as and under the same terms of other management employees.
F. Professional Membership
Upon approval by the City Council, the City will pay dues for Employee’s membership in professional associations related to his position as City Manager or that are in the City’s interests.
G. Automobile Allowance
City shall provide Employee with an automobile allowance of six hundred dollars ($600) per month, or portion thereof.
H. Cellular Phone Allowance
City shall provide Employee with the use of a cellular phone or a cellular phone allowance of one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per month, or portion thereof. The cellular phone shall not be used by persons other than the Employee. The Employee may use the cellular phone for incidental personal purposes, consistent with the City's adopted electronic device policy or DocuSign Envelope ID: AB8EC064-CFCB-4EA0-8FB7-D50EEB3D677E 24438.00000\42409265.1
- 7 -
other applicable policies. The City shall also provide for maintenance, repair and replacement costs of said cellular phone, in accordance with City policy.
X. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Any modifications of this Agreement will be effective only if made in writing and signed by both the Employee and the City.
B. The salary and compensation set forth in Section II and the fringe benefits set forth in Section IX shall be the exclusive consideration provided to Employee under this Agreement. Employee shall not be entitled to any additional compensation, salary increases, or fringe benefits provided to any other city employees or bargaining groups unless this Agreement is duly amended to incorporate such provision.
C. All compensation, benefits and comparable payments to be provided to the Employee under this Agreement shall be less withholdings required by law. The compensation, benefits and comparable payments set forth in this Agreement shall be provided subject to any rules, regulations, agreements, or policies established for the City’s management group, as of the date of this Agreement.
D. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or written, between the Parties hereto with respect to the employment of the Employee by the City and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the Parties with respect to the employment of the Employee by the City.
E. Each Party agrees and acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any Party, or anyone acting on behalf of any Party, which are not embodied herein and that any agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall not be valid or binding on either Party.
F. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way.
DocuSign Envelope ID: AB8EC064-CFCB-4EA0-8FB7-D50EEB3D677E 24438.00000\42409265.1
- 8 -
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
By: ___________________________
Phil Ayala, Mayor
Dated: ___________________________
Attest: ___________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
___________________________
City Attorney, Best Best & Krieger
ROBERT A. JOHNSON
By:
Robert A. Johnson
Dated: ___________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: AB8EC064-CFCB-4EA0-8FB7-D50EEB3D677E 7/3/2024
7/8/2024
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT CITY MANAGER
(July 1, 2025, Salary Adjustment)
A. The City of San Jacinto (“City”) entered into an Employment Agreement, effective July 1, 2024, with Mr. Robert A. Johnson to serve as the City Manager of the City; and B. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Johnson receives a yearly Cost of Living Adjustment (“COLA”) of 5% effective July 1, 2025; and
C. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, the City Council recently held an annual performance evaluation and determined that Mr. Johnson has met the prerequisites for an annual salary adjustment; and D. The City Council grants a 4% annual salary adjustment that is to be set forth in section II of the Employment Agreement.
Now therefore, the Parties mutually agree and promise as follows:
1. Employee’s base salary, to be set forth in Section II of the Employment Agreement, shall be amended to be $27,528.50 per month, effective July 1, 2025.
2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO ROBERT A. JOHNSON
By:_________________________________
Valerie Vandever, Mayor
Attest: ______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
By: _________________________________
Robert A. Johnson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Craig Hayes, City Attorney
Best Best & Krieger
Docusign Envelope ID: FBE70466-998B-4384-A82F-FA01A59FB1D0 1 SECOND AMENDMENT TO CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (City Manager Transition and Executive Advisory Role)
This Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement (“Second Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 2nd day of June, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of San Jacinto, a municipal corporation and general law city organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (“City), and Robert A. Johnson (“Employee”). City and Employee are sometimes referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. City and Employee entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated, July 1, 2024, whereby Employee agreed to serve as City Manager of the City (“Agreement”).
B. City and Employee subsequently entered into that certain First Amendment to the Employment Agreement (“First Amendment”), dated July 1, 2025, for the purposes of amending and increasing Employee’s base salary.
C. Employee has notified the City Council of his desire to transition out of the position of City Manager and, for a limited transition period, continue serving the City in a different executive and advisory capacity; and D. The City Council desires to provide for an orderly transition of executive management responsibilities, while retaining Employee’s institutional knowledge, project experience, and assistance with certain City priorities.
E. The Parties therefore desire to amend the Agreement to memorialize Employee’s transition from City Manager to Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council, and to set forth the terms and conditions governing Employee’s continued employment during the transition period.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, and agreements set forth herein, the Parties mutually agree and promise as follows:
1. Incorporation of Recitals.
The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Transition from City Manager Position and Amendment of Title.
Upon the effective date of the City Council’s appointment of an Interim City Manager (“Transition Date”), Employee shall cease serving as City Manager of the City and shall no longer possess, perform, or exercise the powers, duties, or authority of the City Manager under the San Jacinto Municipal Code, the Agreement, or otherwise, except to the extent expressly authorized by the City Council and permitted by law. The Parties acknowledge and agree that Employee’s transition under this Second Amendment shall not, in and of itself, constitute a termination, removal, resignation, retirement from City employment, or separation from City service.
Rather, as of the Transition Date, Employee shall continue in employment with the City in the amended position of Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council, subject to the terms of the Agreement as amended by this Second Amendment. From and after the Transition Date, references in the Agreement to “City Manager” shall be deemed to refer to Employee in his amended capacity as Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and Special Advisor to the City Council.
3. Transition Services Period.
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the Agreement as amended by this Second Amendment, Employee’s employment in the amended position described herein shall commence on the Transition Date and 2 shall continue through December 31, 2026 (“Transition Services Period”). Upon expiration of the Transition Services Period, Employee’s employment with the City shall end without further action by either Party, unless the Parties enter into a subsequent written amendment approved by the City Council and executed by both Parties.
The expiration of the Transition Services Period shall not constitute a termination without cause by the City and shall not entitle Employee to Severance Pay or other separation compensation, except for any compensation, accrued leave cash-out, or benefits required by the Agreement, City policy, applicable benefit plan documents, or applicable law.
4. Amended Duties.
Effective as of the Transition Date, Sections III, IV, and V of the Agreement are hereby amended to provide that Employee shall perform the duties set forth in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, together with such other duties as may be assigned by the City Council and agreed to by Employee in a manner consistent with this Second Amendment and applicable law. In the event a material question arises regarding whether a matter falls within Employee’s amended duties or the authority of the Interim City Manager or successor City Manager, the matter shall be resolved by direction of the City Council, or pending such direction, by the Mayor in consultation with the City Attorney to the extent consistent with applicable law and the Agreement.
5. Compensation and Waiver of Further Salary Adjustments.
During the Transition Services Period, Employee’s base salary shall remain Twenty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars and Fifty Cents ($27,528.50) per month. Employee acknowledges and agrees that, during the Transition Services Period, he shall not be entitled to any cost-of-living adjustment, annual salary adjustment, merit increase, market adjustment, or other increase in base salary otherwise provided for in Section II of the Agreement, any prior amendment, City policy, or City practice, unless expressly approved by the City Council in a subsequent written amendment to the Agreement. Section VII of the Agreement shall not apply during the Transition Services Period, and the City Council shall have no obligation to conduct an annual performance evaluation of Employee during the Transition Services Period. Except as expressly provided in this Second Amendment, Employee’s compensation and benefits shall remain as provided in the Agreement, as previously amended.
6. Availability and Work Location.
Employee shall remain reasonably available by telephone, text message, electronic mail, video conference, and in person as necessary to perform the duties described in this Second Amendment. Employee shall be physically present at City offices approximately two (2) days per week, as time permits and as reasonably necessary for the performance of assigned duties, and may otherwise perform duties remotely or at such other locations as may be appropriate for the assigned work.
7. Termination During Transition Services Period.
Employee shall continue to serve at the will and pleasure of the City Council. During the Transition Services Period, the City Council may terminate Employee’s employment without cause or for cause in accordance with Section VIII of the Agreement, as amended by this Second Amendment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Section VIII(C) shall not apply during the Transition Services Period. In the event the City terminates Employee’s employment without cause before expiration of the Transition Services Period, any Severance Pay shall be limited to the salary and health-benefit continuation Employee would have received from the effective date of termination through December 31, 2026. Employee shall not be entitled to Severance Pay if Employee voluntarily resigns, retires, separates from employment upon expiration of the Transition Services Period, or is terminated for cause.
Section VIII.D of the Agreement, including the statutory reimbursement obligations set forth therein, shall remain in full force and effect.
8. No City Manager Authority Following Transition Date. 3 Employee shall not represent himself as City Manager after the Transition Date. Employee shall perform his duties in coordination with the Interim City Manager or successor City Manager, as appropriate. Employee’s authority shall be limited to the duties set forth in Exhibit “A” and any further direction lawfully provided by the City Council.
9. Compliance with Law; Confidentiality.
Employee shall continue to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, City policies, ethics rules, conflict-of-interest requirements, confidentiality obligations, and lawful directions of the City Council applicable to Employee’s amended position.
10. No Other Amendments.
Except as expressly amended by this Second Amendment, the Agreement, as previously amended, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict between this Second Amendment and the Agreement or the First Amendment, this Second Amendment shall control.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO ROBERT A. JOHNSON
By:____________________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
Attest: _________________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
By: ____________________________________
Robert A. Johnson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Craig Hayes, City Attorney
Best Best & Krieger
4 EXHIBIT “A”
TRANSITION SERVICES DUTIES
During the Transition Services Period, Employee shall perform the following duties, subject to City Council direction, applicable law, and the terms of the Agreement as amended by the Second Amendment:
1. Executive Director of San Jacinto Power.
Employee shall serve as Executive Director of San Jacinto Power and shall assist with or oversee, as applicable, the following matters:
• San Jacinto Power day-to-day operations;
• Energy-efficiency projects;
• Residential solar and battery programs, including PowerChoice; • Commercial and industrial solar and battery programs, including PowerChoice+; • Carport, solar, battery, and electric-fueling-station projects, including projects involving City Hall/Library, the Community Center, and the San Jacinto Sheriff Station;
• Disadvantaged Communities energy-efficiency grants and programs, including programs focused on solar installation and energy-saving upgrades; and
• Mentoring and managing one 0.5 FTE employee assigned to San Jacinto Power or related programs.
2. CalChoice.
Employee may serve as Interim Chief Executive Officer of California Choice Energy Authority/CalChoice through December 31, 2026, subject to any required CalChoice approvals, authorizations, and applicable law. Nothing in this Second Amendment shall require Employee to serve in such capacity or limit CalChoice’s authority with respect to that role.
3. Special Advisor to the City Council; Transition Support.
Employee shall serve as Special Advisor to the City Council and shall provide transition-related assistance, including:
• Assisting with the transition of direct reports and operational matters to the Interim City Manager; • Assisting the City Attorney and Interim City Manager with larger projects, goals, and background matters not previously transitioned to staff;
• Providing background information, institutional knowledge, and mentoring to the Interim City Manager; • Assisting the Interim City Manager with communication practices responsive to City Council needs; • Assisting with organizational structure or change-management issues, if requested; and • Assisting with structural reorganization or the filling of budgeted vacant positions, if requested and consistent with the Interim City Manager’s authority.
4. Economic Development and City Property Development.
Employee shall continue to assist with economic development and City property development matters, including:
• Main Street and City property development;
• City acquisition of property on Main Street for potential development opportunities; • Developer relationships related to investment in, and construction of, market-rate product on Main Street; • Efforts to identify a partner to develop, construct, finance, or otherwise assist with a City Hall facility; and • Assist with transition of relationships, project history, and institutional knowledge to the Interim City Manager or successor City Manager.
June 2, 2026
TO: City Council
REQUESTED
BY:
Kimberly Ganimian, Finance Director
APPROVED
BY:
Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Annual Proceedings for Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 (LLPD No. 1) – Initiation and Intent to Levy Assessments for Fiscal Year 2026–2027
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Adopt Resolution 4125 initiating proceedings and ordering the Assessment District Engineer to prepare and file the Engineer’s Report for LLPD No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2026–2027, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §22622.
2. Adopt Resolution 4126 declaring the City’s intent to levy and collect assessments within LLPD No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2026–2027, accepting the Engineer’s Report, and setting June 16, 2026, as the date of the public hearing to consider the annual levy.
DISCUSSION:
Resolution of Initiation
LLPD No. 1 requires annual proceedings under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, including initiation of the levy process, preparation of the Engineer’s Report, and setting a public hearing. The Resolution of Initiation begins the FY 2026–2027 process and directs the Assessment District Engineer (NBS) to prepare the required report. No new parcels are being annexed this year other than those previously conditioned through development approvals.
LLPD No. 1 is a pre‑Proposition 218 district and does not include an automatic cost‑of‑living escalator. As a result, the maximum assessment cannot be increased without approval by property owners per Article XIIID of the California Constitution.
Resolution of Intent & Engineer’s Report
The Resolution of Intent accepts the Engineer’s Report and sets June 16, 2026, as the public hearing date.
Assessments will remain unchanged from the prior fiscal year. Because LLPD No. 1 is a pre‑Proposition 218 district without an escalation factor, increases cannot occur without property‑owner approval. Current service costs continue to exceed assessment revenues, and a General Fund subsidy of approximately $1.2 million is anticipated to maintain existing service levels, subject to available funding.
Adoption of the Resolution of Intent is required to continue the annual levy and to provide notice to property owners of the upcoming public hearing.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with adopting the Resolution of Initiation or the Resolution of Intent. These actions begin the annual assessment process and set the public hearing date. Any General Fund subsidy needed to support District operations will be addressed through the broader budget process.
Attachments
Resolution No. 4125 - LLPD 1 Initiation.pdf
Resolution No. 4126 - LLPD 1 Intention.pdf
LLPD No. 1 FY 26-27 Engineer's Report.pdf
Resolution No. 4125
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 4125
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING
THE DISTRICT’S ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND TO FILE A REPORT
RELATED TO MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, AND PARK
DISTRICT NO. 1, AND ANY ASSESSMENT THEREON FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2026-2027
WHEREAS, heretofore the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No.1 was created pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Section 22500, et. seq.); and
WHEREAS, California Streets and Highways Code Section 22622 provides that this Council shall adopt a Resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements in such a District and ordering the City Engineer, or designated District Engineer, to prepare and file a report related to annual maintenance and assessment in such a District; and WHEREAS, no new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for said Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 (LLPD No. 1); and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows:
Section 1: The Recitals, as set forth in this Resolution, are in all respects true and correct.
Section 2: NBS, the designated Assessment District Engineer, is ordered and directed to prepare an annual report as specified in the California Streets and Highways Code Section 22565, et. seq. with respect to the LLPD No.1 for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Resolution No. 4125
Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED, SIGNED and ADOPTED this 2
nd day of June, 2026:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
City of San Jacinto
By: _____________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
City Attorney, City of San Jacinto
Best, Best & Krieger, LLP.
Resolution No. 4125
CERTIFICATE
I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 4125 was passed, adopted, and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held on the 2
nd day of June 2026, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 2
nd day of June 2026.
______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
State of California
Resolution No. 4126
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 4126
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND
PARK DISTRICT NO. 1 AND GIVING NOTICE OF AND SETTING THE
TIME AND PLACE OF THE HEARING ON THE LEVY OF THE
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027
WHEREAS, on June 16, 1992 the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, (“City”) authorized the formation of Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 (the “District”) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”), for the maintenance and servicing of street lights, landscaping, parkways and median islands; and
WHEREAS, in November 1996 the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 218 which added Article XIIID to the California Constitution requiring, among other things, new procedures for the approval of the levying of assessments against real property; and
WHEREAS, Article XIIID of the California Constitution requires that assessments comply with stated procedural and approval provisions by July 1, 1997, unless an assessment district meets certain exemptions as set forth in Section 5 of Article XIIID, which exemptions include the following:
“(a) any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage system or vector control.” “(b) any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed;” and
WHEREAS, the District assessments proposed for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 are exempt from Proposition 218 because the assessments are either general revenue for the operation and maintenance of street and highways, all expenditures thereunder qualifying as street maintenance as defined by the State of California, or the assessments were approved by the property owners on June 16, 1992, originally imposed prior to the passage of Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, the Act also requires that the City comply with certain procedural and approval procedures before levying its annual assessments under an existing assessment district; and
Resolution No. 4126
WHEREAS, the adoption of this Resolution, among other things, is required in order to levy the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for the District; and WHEREAS, by said Resolution the City Council ordered NBS, the company designated by this Council as the Assessment District Engineer, to file a report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and
WHEREAS, NBS has filed such report with the City Clerk, and such report has been presented to and was considered by the City Council.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California as follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby declares its intention to levy and collect assessments for the District during the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 pursuant to the Act. The area to be assessed is located in the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California. The boundaries of the District are described in the report on file with the City Clerk.
Section 2. The purpose of the District is for maintenance and servicing of landscaping, irrigation, parkways, medians and street lighting.
Section 3. The report filed by NBS which is on file with the City Clerk and which has been considered by the City Council at the meeting at which this Resolution has been adopted, is hereby accepted. All interested persons are referred to that report for a full and detailed description of the work and improvements, the boundaries of the District, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land with the District. The complete list of assessor parcel numbers can be found on file with the City Clerk.
Section 4. The Fiscal Year 2026-2027 assessments in each benefit zone within District are the same as the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 assessments and are not proposed to be increased.
Section 5. On Tuesday, June 16, 2026, at the hour of 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter during the course of its regularly scheduled meeting, the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed annual assessment. The hearing will be held at the San Jacinto Community Center, 625 S. Pico Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583.
Section 6 The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of said hearing by publishing a copy of this Resolution once in the Press Enterprise not less than 10 days before the date of the hearing pursuant to Section 22626 of the Streets and Highways Code.
Resolution No. 4126
Section 7. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code.
APPROVED, SIGNED and ADOPTED this 2
nd day of June, 2026:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
City of San Jacinto
By: _____________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
City Attorney, City of San Jacinto
Best, Best & Krieger, LLP.
Resolution No. 4126
CERTIFICATE
I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 4126 was passed, adopted, and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held on the 2
nd day of June 2026, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 2
nd day of June 2026.
______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
State of California
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report For:
Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1
May 2026
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. ENGINEER’S LETTER ........................................................................................................1
2. OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................2
3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................4
3.1 Landscaping and Park Maintenance .......................................................................4
3.2 Street Lights and Traffic Signals ..............................................................................4
3.3 Street Trees.............................................................................................................5
4. ESTIMATE OF COSTS .......................................................................................................6
5. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT.......................................................................................7
5.1 Method of Apportionment......................................................................................7
5.2 Zones of Benefit ......................................................................................................8
5.3 Assessment Formula ...............................................................................................9
6. ASSESSMENT UNIT (“AU”) METHOD.............................................................................. 11
7. BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM................................................................... 15
8. ASSESSMENT ROLL........................................................................................................ 16 Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 1
1. ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto (the “City”), State of California, directed NBS to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, and an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 (the “District”) for Fiscal Year 2026/27; and
WHEREAS, the report includes a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, and the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the assessments as detailed in this Engineer’s Report and as summarized in the table below are made to cover the portion of the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received.
Description
Maximum
Rate Per
AU
Maximum
Amount
Actual
Rate Per
AU
Actual
Amount(2)
Total Costs for District Improvements/Services $2,294,618.00 $2,294,618.00 District Assessments
Landscaping - Zone A-1 (Citywide) $34.76 $254,802.44 $34.76 $254,802.44 Landscaping - Zone A-2 (Soboba Springs) 229.96 38,518.30 229.96 38,518.30 Landscaping - Zone A-3 (Rancho San Jacinto) 77.00 77,000.00 77.00 77,000.00 Lighting - Zone B (Lighted Areas) 25.89 238,917.45 25.89 238,917.45 Lighting - Zone C (Non-Lit Outlying Areas) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parks - Zone D 14.67 50,363.43 14.67 50,363.43
Rounding and Adjustments 0.00 0.00
Total District Assessments $659,601.63 $659,601.63
Contribution From Other Sources 234,800.00 234,800.00
Contribution From LLPD No. 2 198,899.00 198,899.00
Total Funds Available $1,093,300.63 $1,093,300.63
Contribution From General Fund (1) $1,201,317.37 $1,201,317.37 (1) Subject to available funds.
(2) The 2026/27 Actual Amount may differ slightly from the Assessment Roll and final applied levy amounts due to rounding.
I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer’s Report and assessments herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the Assessment Law.
By: ____________________________
John G. Egan
Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. 14853
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 2
2. OVERVIEW
This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of: street lights and traffic signals, landscaped areas (parkways and medians, etc.) and municipal parks; on a citywide basis; all of which are located on public land, public rights-of-way, or in landscaping easements within the City.
In November of 1996, the voters of California passed Proposition 218 which added Articles XIII C and XIII D to the California Constitution. These Constitutional provisions affect the procedural and substantive requirements for the levy of assessments. Among other things, the requirements provide that assessed parcels of real property must receive a special benefit from assessments. Assessments are also subject to new majority protest requirements. These new requirements apply, unless an assessment district meets certain exemptions set forth in Proposition 218.
The following assessments are exempt from the procedures and approval process of Article XIII D of the California Constitution:
A. Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and/or operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems, or vector control; or B. Any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed.
Zone A (Including Sub-Zones A-1, A-2 and A-3), Zone B and Zone E of the District qualify as existing assessments exempt under exemption "A" described above. This conclusion has been reached using the definitions provided by the Office of the Controller for the State of California and the Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures published by the division of local government affairs. Under this definition, street improvements include, but are not limited to, such things as street lighting and parkway and median landscaping.
Zone D park maintenance assessments within the District also qualify as an existing assessment exempt under exemption "B" described above in that the park maintenance assessment imposed was consented to by all of the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the park maintenance assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed. The language of Articles XIII C and XIII D will be subject to future legislation and court decisions in order to clarify the specific intent of these Constitutional provisions. At the time that this report was prepared no such legislation or judicial guidance existed with regard to determining how the property owner consent exemption would apply. However, the drafter of these provisions, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, has stated that it intended to exempt from the procedural and substantive requirements those assessments being re-levied on an annual basis under an existing assessment district so long as the assessments are not increased. The proposed assessments for the 2026/27 Fiscal Year for the District fall within this exemption because they are merely the annual levy for assessments previously consented to by property owners, and are not being increased.
Section 22573, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”), requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states:
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 3
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.
The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]."
The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, “by reason of variations in the nature, location and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements." An assessment district may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas.
Although Proposition 218 mandates that parcels owned by public agencies be assessed if they receive special benefit from the improvements being serviced and maintained by the assessments; under the exemptions stated above, properties owned by public agencies, such as city, county, state, federal government, or board-governed special districts, are not assessed.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this report, refers to an individual property assigned its own assessor’s property identification number by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses assessor’s property identification numbers and specific fund numbers to identify, on the tax roll, properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.
Following consideration of public comments at a noticed public hearing, and review of the Final Annual Engineer’s Report, the City Council may confirm the report as submitted and order the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27. If approved, the assessment information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax roll for each benefiting parcel for Fiscal Year 2026/27.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 4
3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS
Plans and specifications for the improvements have been prepared and approved as part of the improvement plans. These plans and specifications are on file and available for review at the office of the City Engineer and, by reference, have been made part of this report.
3.1 Landscaping and Park Maintenance
A map showing the location of all landscaping sub-zones and park maintenance areas within the District is on file at City Hall with the City Clerk and is made a part of this report by reference.
Servicing means the furnishing of:
1. Water for the irrigation of any landscape, park improvement, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other appurtenant improvements.
2. Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvement.
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including:
1. Installation, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any landscape, park improvement, including turf, shrub and tree plantings, statuary, fountains, other ornamental structures, lights, electrical systems, playground equipment, play courts, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and public restrooms.
2. Removal of graffiti by washing, painting, grinding, sanding, or other usual means.
3. Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
4. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.
5. Land preparation which may be necessary for the installation, repair or replacement of landscape, park improvements, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage, including grading, leveling, cutting, filling, and sod.
3.2 Street Lights and Traffic Signals
A map showing the location of all street lights within the District is on file at City Hall with the City Clerk and is made a part of this report by reference.
Servicing means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for public street lighting and traffic signal facilities.
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual installation, maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including the repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of a component of the street lighting system, traffic signal system, or appurtenant horizontal or vertical surfaces (including graffiti removal).
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 5
3.3 Street Trees
Reference to Street Trees throughout this report is only a description of improvements that were proposed during initial formation of the District. The assessment for street trees, although approved by property owners during the initial formation of the District, was not levied by the City prior to the passage of Proposition 218. As such, since the District has been grandfathered in under the assessment methodology and assessment rates existing prior to Proposition 218, the assessment for street trees cannot be levied unless additional property owner approval is secured through the procedures outlined in Proposition 218.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 6
4. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The following table provides an estimate of the costs of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27.
Parks Cost Item
A-1 A-2 A-3 B C D Totals
City-wide Soboba Springs Rancho San Jacinto Lights No Lights $413,726 $16,743 $97,467 $155,178 $683,114
Maintenance & Operations
Supplies & Materials 2 0 0 500 0 0 500
Professional & Specialized Services 3 36,000 3,443 8,000 3,000 3,000 53,443 Repair & Maintenance 4
Contracts, Leases & Rents 5 128,750 52,483 355,000 60,664 153,500 750,397 Utilities 6 55,000 30,500 337,500 150,000 115,000 688,000 Overhead, Insurance & Bonds 30,294 6,770 0 32,763 49,337 119,164 Capital Outlays
(126,046) (72,853) (198,899)
Interfund Transfer (Equipment Replacement) (25,000) (3,000) (28,000) CSA 152 (206,800) (206,800)
(383,967) (71,421) (592,421) (7,510) (145,999) (1,201,318) TOTALS $254,802 $38,518 $77,000 $238,917 $0 $50,363 $659,602 Amount per AU 34.76 229.96 77.00 25.89 0.00 14.67
Rounding and Adjustments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0 TOTAL AMOUNT TO ASSESSMENT $659,602
Notes:
2. Supplies and Materials include office supplies, uniforms and safety equipment, small tools, etc.
3. Professional and Specialized Services include assessment engineering, legal counsel, City administration and County Auditor fees.
4. Repair and Maintenance includes building and vehicle R&M, parts and supplies for landscaping, irrigation and mowing, and street light R&M.
5. Contracts, Leases and Rents include weekend restroom maintenance, landscape maintenance contracts, traffic signal maintenance provided by Riverside County/CALTRANS, and vertical surface maintenance (graffiti abatement).
6. Utilities include water, electricity, and street light maintenance provided by SCE and City of San Jacinto.
8. Subject to available funds.
Landscaping Lighting
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT No. 1
MAINTENANCE ESTIMATE
FISCAL YEAR 2026/27
BENEFIT ZONES
7. Fund Transfer from Rancho San Jacinto LLPD No. 2 funds to finance the LLPD No. 2 component of shared facilities in Rancho San Jacinto, and to account for the LLPD No. 2 zones that don't have parks and contribute to the City-wide parks.
Cost Items
Personnel Services 1
Interfund Transfer (LLPD No. 2) 7
Interfund Transfer (General Fund) 8
1. Personnel Services is calculated based on estimated hours and a fully-burdened hourly rate, which includes amounts for salaries, fringe benefits, and other departmental operating expenditures that cannot be directly assigned to one zone. Accordingly, all other expenditures are those directly charged to each zone.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 7
5. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
5.1 Method of Apportionment
The net amount to be assessed upon lands within the District in accordance with this report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefit to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements, namely the maintenance and servicing of public landscaping, lighting and park facilities within such District.
The maintenance and servicing of public landscaping, lighting and park facilities installed and constructed in public places in the City provides a special benefit which is received by parcels within the specified zones of benefit in the District. Landscaping within the District enhances the aesthetic appeal of parcels within the landscaping zones. Such landscaping improves erosion resistance and dust control. Street lights improve ingress and egress from lots or parcels by illuminating access after sunset. Such street lights, by so improving ingress and egress, improve the security of such lots or parcels by improving the nighttime visibility of such lots or parcels and improve the access of emergency vehicles thereto and in the case of commercial lots or parcels, facilitate the opening and operation of business uses after sunset.
The primary benefits of landscaping are set forth below:
1. Improved aesthetic appeal of nearby parcels.
2. Green space within the urban environment.
3. Enhances wind breaks.
4. Improved erosion resistance.
5. Improved dust control.
6. Tends to instill a sense of pride within the neighborhood.
The primary benefits of municipal parks are as set forth below:
1. Designated sites where children may gather to play without danger from traffic.
2. Designated sites where adult, youth and family activities can take place (i.e., picnics, baseball and softball leagues, soccer leagues, other athletic activities, art festivals, animal shows, and training, etc.)
3. Green space and open space within the urban environment.
4. Availability of public restrooms.
The primary benefits of street lighting are set forth below:
1. Improvement to traffic circulation and reduction in nighttime accidents and attendant human misery and decrease in personal property loss.
2. The deterrence of crime and aid to police protection.
3. Promotion of business during nighttime hours.
4. Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 8
5. The improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see, which helps people safely find their way.
6. Improved ingress and egress to lots and parcels.
7. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and reduced damage to improvements.
5.2 Zones of Benefit
The 1972 Act provides for areas within a district to be classified into different zones of benefit. The District is divided into separate zones and sub-zones for funding landscaping, lighting and park improvements. The various zones and sub-zones are delineated on the Assessment Diagram on file in the office of the City Clerk.
5.2.1 LANDSCAPING ZONES
Landscaping is divided into three (3) benefit sub-zones. These sub-zones are labeled A-1, A-2 and A-3 and are comprised of the areas described below:
Landscape Zone Descriptions:
1. Subzone A-1: All parcels in the fully inhabited areas of the City approximately bounded by the San Jacinto River, the southerly City Limit, the northerly prolongation of Pine Avenue, De Anza Drive, the San Diego Aqueduct, and the northerly City Limit to the San Jacinto River; with the exception of Subzones A-2 and A-3; and excluding parcels in Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2.
2. Subzone A-2: All parcels in the Soboba Springs (Village IV) Tract.
3. Subzone A-3: All parcels in the Rancho San Jacinto area that are not in Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2.
5.2.2 STREET LIGHTING ZONES
Street lighting is divided into two (2) benefit zones. These zones are labeled Zone B (lighted areas) and Zone C (non-lit outlying areas) and are comprised of the areas described below:
Street Lighting Zone Descriptions:
1. Zone B: Those parcels within the boundary of the District that have street lights installed within close proximity or that are surrounded by areas that have street lights.
2. Zone C: Those parcels within the boundary of the District that have no street lights within a reasonable distance. These parcels are primarily in outlying areas with little or no population.
5.2.3 PARKS ZONE
Parks are comprised of a single citywide benefit zone designated Zone D and as described below:
Parks Zone Description:
1. Zone D: All parcels within the District that are included in existing residential uses (including apartments, condominiums, PUD's, mobile home parks, recreational vehicle parks, etc.); Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 9
commercial/industrial uses; and churches/fraternal organizations; and are included in petitions signed when they were developed. No vacant parcels are included.
5.3 Assessment Formula
The formula used to calculate the amount spread to all parcels within the District for landscaping, street lighting, and parks starts with the basic assessment unit (“AU”). The basic AU is given a value of one (1) for a single-family residential parcel. From this base, the remaining parcels are related according to their equivalent benefit within each benefit zone or sub-zone. Zone A parcels are assessed for landscaping separately in three (3) sub-zones. Zone B parcels are assessed for street lighting and Zone C parcels are not assessed for street lighting. Zone D residential and commercial/industrial parcels containing dwelling units or business establishments are assessed for municipal parks.
Vacant parcels (agricultural, residential or commercial/industrial) are assigned 0.5 AU for landscaping and street lighting because they have a partial benefit due to the overall enhancement of the area and to the increase in accessibility from the installation and/or maintenance and servicing of said public improvements. Vacant parcels are not assessed for park maintenance.
Commercial/industrial and public utility parcels are assigned 3.0 AU per acre (1.0 AU minimum, 10.0 AU maximum) for landscaping, street lighting, and parks based upon the fact that one acre of commercial/industrial property is the equivalent of three single-family residences.
Small residences (less than 1,000 square feet and/or less than 50 feet of frontage) (Riverside County Land Use Code "RS") are assessed at a rate of 0.7 AU for landscaping and 1.0 AU for all other improvements due to smaller frontages relative to landscaping, but have the same benefit as other single-family residences from street lights and park maintenance.
Condominiums and PUD's are assigned 0.9 AU for each type of maintenance because, although these units have most of the characteristics of a single-family residence, they generally are somewhat smaller and have common areas and homeowner associations.
Apartments and common unit condominiums are assigned 0.6 AU per apartment unit for landscape maintenance and 0.8 AU for each of the other types of indicated public improvement because apartment units are typically smaller than a single-family residence.
Mobile homes are assigned 0.5 AU per mobile home unit for landscaping and 0.7 AU for street lighting and parks because these units are generally smaller than a single-family residence or condominium.
Recreational vehicle (RV) parks (own or rental) are assigned 0.3 AU for landscape maintenance and 0.7 AU for street lighting and parks for the same reasons cited for mobile homes, except that RV parks often have high vacancies, especially during the summer months.
Railroad parcels are assessed 0.5 AU per acre (1.0 AU minimum, 5.0 AU maximum) for street lighting only because street lighting causes a reduction in vandalism on railroad property and increases safety at railroad crossings, but receives less benefit than does a single-family residence because of the reduced activity on railroad tracks.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 10
Churches and fraternal organizations are assigned 0.5 AU per acre (1.0 AU minimum, 4.0 AU maximum) for each type of indicated public improvement because these parcels obtain benefit from each type of improvement, but at a reduced rate due to the periodic use of the property.
Assessments by zone, if applicable, are additive. As the land use on any specific parcel changes from one fiscal year to the next, the applicable assessment rate shall also change to reflect the change in land use.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 11
6. ASSESSMENT UNIT (“AU”) METHOD
The following table shows the assessment formula using the AU method for the most common County land use codes.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1
ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD
Land Use
Code Land Use
Zone A Landscaping
Assessment Formula
Zone B Lighting
Assessment Formula
Zone D Park
Assessment Formula
AA Agricultural Avocado Grove 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AC Agricultural Citrus Grove 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AD Agricultural Dairy 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AI Agricultural Irrigated Farm 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AL Agricultural Livestock 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AN Agricultural Non-Irrigated 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AO Agricultural - Other Crops 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AP Agricultural Poultry 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AR Agricultural Residential 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit AS Agricultural w/Structures 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AV Agricultural Vineyard 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AY Agricultural Vacant 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel A1 Agricultural Other 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel CA Apartments 0.6 AU per Unit 0.8 AU per Unit 0.8 AU per Unit CF Churches, Fraternal Orgs. 0.5 AU per Acre (1.0 AU min, 4.0 AU max)
0.5 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 4.0 AU max)
0.5 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 4.0 AU max)
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 12
ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD
(Continued)
Land Use
Code Land Use
Zone A Landscaping
Assessment Formula
Zone B Lighting
Assessment Formula
Zone D Park
Assessment Formula
CL Commercial/Industrial
on Leased Land
3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)
3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)
3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)
CR Commercial w/Residences 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit CY Commercial Vacant 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel C1
Commercial/Industrial
3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)
3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)
3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)
EP Exempt Public Property Exempt Exempt Exempt
HO Homeowner's Assn, Open Space Exempt Exempt Exempt
MF Mobile home Legal Foundation 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel ML Mobile home, Leased Lot 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel MO Mobile home Assessed 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel MP Mobile home Rental/Lease Lot 0.5 AU per MH Unit 0.7 AU per MH Unit 0.7 AU per MH Unit MR Mobile home Lot Only 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel MT Mobile home - Transient 0.3 AU per MH Unit 0.5 AU per MH Unit 0.5 AU per MH Unit M0 Mobile home Assessed 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel M1 Mobile home Assessed 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel PA Ag Preserve Avocado Grove 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 13
ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD
(Continued)
Land Use
Code Land Use
Zone A Landscaping
Assessment Formula
Zone B Lighting
Assessment Formula
Zone D Park
Assessment Formula
PC Ag Preserve Citrus Grove 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PD Ag Preserve Dairy 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PI Ag Preserve Irrigated Farm 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PL Ag Preserve Livestock 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PN Ag Preserve Non-Irrigated 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PO Ag Preserve Other Crops 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PP Ag Preserve Poultry 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PR Ag Preserve Residential 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit PS Ag Preserve w/Structures 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PV Ag Preserve Vineyard 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PY Ag Preserve Vacant 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel P1 Ag Preserve Other 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PX Ag Preserve 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel R- Residential 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RA Residential Agriculture 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RC Residential Condo/PUD 0.9 AU per Condo/PUD Unit 0.9 AU per Condo/PUD Unit 0.9 AU per Condo/PUD Unit R1 Residential Single Family 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 14
ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD
(Continued)
Land Use
Code Land Use
Zone A Landscaping
Assessment Formula
Zone B Lighting
Assessment Formula
Zone D Park
Assessment Formula
R2 Residential Duplex/Triplex 0.8 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RS Residential Small 0.7 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RR Railroad Parcels 0.0 AU per Parcel
0.5 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 5.0 AU max) 0.0 AU per Parcel
RV Recreational Vehicle Lot 0.3 AU per RV Parcel 0.5 AU per RV Parcel 0.5 AU per RV Parcel UP Public Utility
3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)
3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)
0.0 AU per Parcel
YD Vacant Desert 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel YM Vacant Mountainous 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel YP Vacant - Prob. Residential 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel YR Vacant Residential 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel YS Vacant Land Miscellaneous 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel YY Vacant Remainder 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel
ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD
(Continued)
Notes:
1. Zone C is not assessed.
2. Public Utilities include gas, electricity, telephone, cable TV, etc. Public utility parcels are assessed in the same manner as commercial property because public utilities are “for profit” enterprises.
3. The fraternal organization category includes such organizations as the Elks Lodge, Moose Lodge, IOOF, Order of Eagles, Mason's, Women's Clubs, etc.
4. Public property includes that property that is exempt from assessment including property owned by the City, County, State, Federal Government, water districts and other special districts.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 15
7. BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The boundaries of the District are completely within the City limits as shown on the maps on file with the City. The map below is for illustration purposes only. The boundary map and assessor’s maps serve as the assessment diagram for the District. The lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor for the current year are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. All parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on the assessor’s maps.
Parcels within Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2, an assessment district formed in April 2002 and subsequent annexations thereto, that are within the boundaries of the District are not levied the District assessments.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 16
8. ASSESSMENT ROLL
The assessment roll is provided on the following pages. The description of each lot or parcel as part of the records of the County Assessor are by reference made part of this report.
Parcel listing currently available with City Clerk or on City website upon adoption June 2, 2026
TO: City Council
REQUESTED
BY:
Kimberly Ganimian, Finance Director
APPROVED
BY:
Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Annual Proceedings for Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) – Initiation and Intent to Levy Assessments for FY 2026–2027
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Adopt Resolution 4127 to initiate proceedings and direct the Assessment District Engineer to prepare and file the Engineer’s Report for LLPD No. 2 for FY 2026–2027, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §22622.
2. Adopt Resolution 4128 to accept the Engineer’s Report, declare the City’s intent to levy and collect assessments for FY 2026–2027, and set June 16, 2026, as the date of the public hearing.
DISCUSSION:
LLPD No. 2 consists of the original district area and approximately 91 annexation zones, totaling nearly 6,000 parcels. Annual proceedings are required under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, including initiation of the levy process, preparation of the Engineer’s Report, and setting a public hearing.
The Resolution of Initiation begins the FY 2026–2027 process and authorizes preparation of the Engineer’s Report.
The Resolution of Intent accepts that report and sets the public hearing date. LLPD No. 2 is a post‑Proposition 218 district; its maximum assessment may increase annually by CPI (up to 7.5%), though actual levies are based on the cost of maintaining district improvements. New zones may require temporary reserves or operating advances until assessment revenues are received.
These actions are required to continue the annual levy and ensure the District can fund its maintenance obligations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with adoption of the Resolution of Initiation or the Resolution of Intent. These actions begin the annual assessment process and set the public hearing date. Failure to adopt the required resolutions would prevent the City from collecting LLPD No. 2 assessments, requiring the General Fund to cover all district costs.
Attachments
Resolution No. 4127 - LLPD 2 Initiation.pdf
Resolution No. 4128 - LLPD 2 Intention .pdf
FY 2026-27 Engineer's Report LLPD No. 2.pdf
Resolution No. 4127
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 4127
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE
DISTRICT’S ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND TO FILE A REPORT
RELATED TO MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK
DISTRICT NO. 2, AND ANY ASSESSMENT THEREON FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2026-2027
WHEREAS, heretofore the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) was created pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (§22500, et. seq.); and WHEREAS, California Streets and Highways Code §22622 provides that this Council shall adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements in such a district and ordering the District’s Engineer to prepare and file a report related to annual maintenance and assessment in such a district; and
WHEREAS, no new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for said LLPD No. 2; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined, and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows:
Section 1: The recitals, as set forth in this Resolution, are in all respects true and correct.
Section 2: The City Engineer, or designated District Engineer, hereby is ordered and directed to prepare an annual report as specified in California Streets and Highways Code §§22565, et. seq., with respect to LLPD No. 2 for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Resolution No. 4127
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2
nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
By: __________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Best, Best & Krieger
City Attorney, City of San Jacinto
Resolution No. 4127
CERTIFICATE
I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 4127 was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held on the 2
n day of June, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 2
nd day of June, 2026.
______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
State of California
Resolution No. 4128
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 4128
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENT TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND
PARK DISTRICT NO. 2, ACCEPTING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT AND
GIVING NOTICE OF AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE
HEARING ON THE LEVY OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027
WHEREAS, on April 4, 2002 the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, (the “City”) adopted Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (the “District”) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”), for the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals, street trees, landscaping, parkways, median islands, drainage facilities, parks and appurtenant improvements; and
WHEREAS, in November 1996 the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 218 which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution requiring, among other things, new procedures for the approval of the levying of assessments against real property; and
WHEREAS, Article XIIID of the California Constitution requires that assessments comply with stated procedural and approval provisions by July 1, 1997, unless an assessment district meets certain exemptions as set forth in Section 5 of the Article which exemptions include the following:
“(a) any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage system or vector control.”
“(b) any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed;” and
WHEREAS, the District assessments proposed for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 are exempt from Proposition 218 because the assessments either generate revenue for the operation and maintenance of streets and highways, all expenditures thereunder qualifying as street maintenance as defined by the State of California or they were approved by petition of the property owners when the assessments were originally imposed; and
Resolution No. 4128
WHEREAS, no new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for said District; and
WHEREAS, the Act also requires that the City comply with certain procedural and approval procedures before levying its annual assessments under an existing assessment district; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of this Resolution, among other things, is required in order to levy the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for the District; and WHEREAS, by said Resolution the City Council ordered NBS as the person and entity designated by this Council as the Engineer of Work for the District to file a report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and
WHEREAS, NBS has filed such report with the City Clerk, and such report has been presented to and was considered by the City Council.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined, and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby declares that it is its Intent to levy and collect assessments for the District during the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 pursuant to the Act. The area to be assessed is located in the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County,
California. The boundaries of the District are described in the report on file with the City Clerk.
SECTION 2. The purpose of the District is for maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals, street trees, landscaping, parkways, median islands, drainage facilities, parks and appurtenant improvements.
SECTION 3. The report prepared by NBS, which is on file with the City Clerk, and which has been considered by the City Council at the meeting at which this Resolution has been adopted, is hereby accepted. All interested persons are referred to said report for a full and detailed description of the work, the boundaries of the proposed assessment district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land with the District.
SECTION 4. The Fiscal Year 2026-2027 assessments in each benefit zone within the District are within the limits approved by petition of the property owners when the assessments were originally imposed.
Resolution No. 4128
SECTION 5. The City Council hereby declares that the Finance Director has authorization to adjust the District budget in the property tax lien year assessed to the amount authorized in the levy up to the maximum assessment. The Finance Director shall
process budget adjustments within each zone to reflect the actual costs anticipated in each zone of benefit as assessed on the levy up to the maximum assessment.
SECTION 6. On Tuesday, June 16, 2026, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter, during the course of its regularly scheduled meeting, the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed annual assessment. The hearing will be held at the San Jacinto Community Center, 625 S. Pico Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of said hearing by publishing a copy of this Resolution once in the Press Enterprise not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing.
SECTION 8. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2
nd day of June, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
By: _____________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
City Attorney, City of San Jacinto
Best, Best & Krieger, LLP
Resolution No. 4128
CERTIFICATE
I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 4128 was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held on the 2
nd day of June, 2026, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 2
nd day of June, 2026.
______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
State of California
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report For:
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
May 2026
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. ENGINEER’S LETTER ........................................................................................................1
2. OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................2
2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................2
3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................3
4. SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE OF COSTS.................................................................................4
5. ESTIMATE OF COSTS .......................................................................................................7
6. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT.......................................................................................8
6.1 Method of Apportionment......................................................................................8
6.2 Assessment Formula ...............................................................................................9
6.3 Assessment Unit Method........................................................................................9
6.4 Consumer Price Index (CPI) Inflation ....................................................................10
7. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM................................................................................................ 11
8. ASSESSMENT ROLL........................................................................................................ 12 Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 1
1. ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto (the “City”), State of California, directed NBS Government Finance Group, (DBA “NBS”), to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements to be maintained and an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations, and servicing of the improvements for the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (the “District”) for Fiscal Year 2026/27.
WHEREAS, NBS has prepared this report which includes a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, and the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; WHEREAS, the assessment rates and the annual rate escalation factor of the Riverside-San BernardinoOntario area for all urban consumers CPI (not to exceed 7.5%) were approved by property owners through the assessment balloting procedures set forth in Article XIII D Section 4 of the California Constitution (Proposition 218).
NOW THEREFORE, the assessments detailed in this Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) and as summarized in the table below are made to cover the portion of the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received.
Description Maximum Amount Actual Amount (1)
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy $888,942.21 $627,531.79 Park Maintenance Levy 3,163,036.32 2,350,629.26
Landscape Maintenance Levy 1,374,232.39 890,609.93
Storm Drain Levy 2,405,631.66 1,793,855.97
Detention Basin Levy 0.00 0.00
Graffiti Removal Levy 591,612.43 359,290.74
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy 6,998.26 1,259.01
Adjustment Rounding 0.00 (201.76)
Total $8,430,453.27 $6,022,974.94
(1) The 2026/27 Actual Amount may differ slightly from the Assessment Roll and final applied levy amounts due to rounding.
I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer’s Report and assessments herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the Assessment Law.
By: ____________________________
John G. Egan
Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. 14853
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 2
2. OVERVIEW
2.1 Introduction
The Report describes the District and the charge per Assessment Unit (AU) for Fiscal Year 2026/27 based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the improvements and provide the services that benefit parcels within the District. This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the installation, operation, maintenance, and servicing of: streetlights and traffic signals; landscaped areas (parkways, medians, open space, detention/retention basins, etc.); municipal parks; drainage facilities; graffiti removal from horizontal and vertical surfaces which are appurtenant to the above items; all of which are located in public rights-of-way or easements in the District. The District is divided into multiple zones to allow the assessments to properly match the special benefits provided by the improvements to the assessed parcels within the District.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own assessor’s property identification number by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses assessor’s property identification numbers and specific fund numbers to identify on the tax roll properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.
Following consideration of public comments at a noticed public hearing and review of this Report, the City Council may confirm this Report as submitted and order the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27. If approved, the assessment information will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax roll for each benefiting parcel for Fiscal Year 2026/27.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 3
3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS
Plans and specifications for the improvements have been prepared and approved as part of the improvement plans. These plans and specifications are on file and available for review at the office of the City Clerk and, by reference, have been made part of this Report.
The City Council in the Resolutions of Initiation and Intent for Fiscal Year 2014/15, in accordance with the Streets and Highways Code Section 22622, added a flood control basin to the improvements maintained in Zone 38 (Coventry Acres). The flood control basin is composed of lots 1 through 12, inclusive, and lots 78 through 83, inclusive, of Tract Number 31097, in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 398 pages 94 through 103, inclusive, of maps, in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder. The lots that compose the flood control basin are also known as assessor’s property identification numbers 434-520-001-9 through 434-520-012-9, inclusive, and 434-522-001-5 through 434-522-006-0, inclusive. The addition of the flood control basin to the improvements maintained by Zone 38 will not result in an increase to the annual maximum assessment as increased by the annual inflator, approved by the property owners, and assessable on real property within the boundaries of Zone
38. The flood control basin is necessary to protect the Tract and Zone improvements from flooding until other flood control measures are in place.
In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the authorized improvements for Zone 7 (Tesoro) included the repair of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks located within the boundaries of the District. These improvements and services are anticipated to be included in future years. The inclusion of these improvements maintained by Zone 7 will not result in an increase of the annual maximum assessment allowed.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 4
4. SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The following table is a summary of the Fiscal Year 2026/27 estimate of costs.
Zone
2026/27
Levy
Amount
2026/27
Maximum
Rate
2026/27
Actual
Rate
% of
Maximum
(1)
Zone 1 (Sagecrest) $233,061.36 $929.66 $929.66 100%
Zone 1A (Sagecrest) 5,463.00 910.54 910.54 100%
Zone 2 (Meridian Estates) 37,105.94 547.77 410.83 75%
Zone 3 (San Jacinto Ranch) 90,950.28 1,550.77 1,318.15 85% Zone 4 (Timothy Lane) 31,038.56 838.92 838.92 100%
Zone 5 (Sunset Ranch) 49,628.80 954.43 763.55 80%
Zone 6 (Heritage Ranch) 62,317.20 944.22 944.22 100%
Zone 7 (Tesoro) 222,361.98 1,050.65 893.05 85%
Zone 8 (Meadowbrook/Solano) 250,498.84 825.94 743.34 90% Zone 9 (Goldencrest) 185,001.48 980.45 833.38 85%
Zone 10A (Maravilla) 38,476.24 522.83 418.27 80%
Zone 10B (Sendera) 35,548.70 522.83 418.27 80%
Zone 11 (Sandalwood) 140,401.80 1,310.97 1,114.33 85%
Zone 12 (Windmill Plaza) 2,971.60 183.16 119.06 65%
Zone 13 (Park Meadows) 170,217.60 1,251.65 1,001.32 80% Zone 14 (MSJC) 732.80 916.03 732.82 80%
Zone 15 (Willow Creek Apts.) 6,293.18 10,488.71 6,293.23 60% Zone 16 (La Perla) 10,102.30 818.05 531.73 65%
Zone 17 (Cloverdale) 11,644.80 776.37 388.19 50%
Zone 18 (500 S. State Street) 1,362.80 120.93 66.51 55% Zone 19-1 (Walmart) 50,229.36 1,371.27 685.64 50%
Zone 19-2 (Cali Coffee – Santana’s) 3,944.14 1,711.88 1,027.13 60% Zone 20 (Durango) 148,021.02 1,112.96 1,112.96 100%
Zone 21 (Arterra) 101,785.36 697.19 697.19 100%
Zone 22 (Park Hill) 136,420.04 1,272.60 1,018.08 80%
Zone 23 (Summerfield Ranch) 32,660.60 885.16 398.32 45% Zone 24 (El Toro Market) 1,971.94 300.28 165.16 55%
Zone 25 (Stallions Crossing) 83,007.70 848.35 805.93 95% Zone 26 (The Ranch) 265,075.20 1,057.18 898.60 85%
Zone 27 (Potter Ranch) 231,508.38 926.63 880.30 95%
Zone 28 (Mountain View Business Park)(2) 699.24 2,428.08 728.42 30% Zone 29 (Creekside) 156,181.74 1,092.21 1,092.21 100%
Zone 30 (Almaden) 86,475.84 1,310.29 982.72 75%
Zone 31 (Belicia) 72,959.66 1,196.09 1,196.09 100%
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 5
Zone
2026/27
Levy
Amount
2026/27
Maximum
Rate
2026/27
Actual
Rate
% of
Maximum
(1)
Zone 32 (Cottonwood Ranch) $143,858.96 $1,155.99 $1,098.19 95% Zone 33 (Daybreak) 77,270.60 789.71 750.22 95%
Zone 34 (Palmilla) 49,744.64 777.30 777.30 100%
Zone 35 (Terragon) 55,347.14 758.22 758.22 100%
Zone 36 (Cypress) 52,195.92 776.75 621.40 80%
Zone 37 (Cypress/Daybreak) 33,254.38 786.19 707.57 90%
Zone 38 (Coventry Acres) 177,709.28 906.72 906.72 100%
Zone 39 (The Trails) 66,961.28 766.19 727.88 95%
Zone 40 (Winners Circle) 6,441.50 991.09 495.55 50%
Zone 41 (Mosaico) 101,854.48 1,243.68 1,119.32 90%
Zone 42 (Santa Bella) 24,945.84 815.25 692.97 85%
Zone 43 (Remington/Lyndon Trails) 190,146.04 986.01 936.71 95% Zone 44 (Lyon/Shadow Canyon Trail) 0.00 806.82 0.00 0%
Zone 45 (Tamarisk ) 324,938.02 1,351.98 1,284.38 95%
Zone 46 (Parkside Village) 153,958.00 1,099.74 1,099.74 100% Zone 47 (Maravilla Estates) 0.00 414.22 0.00 0%
Zone 48 (San Jacinto Valley Academy) (2) 2,215.64 5,769.99 4,615.99 80% Zone 49 (Pheasant Run) 110,409.76 1,130.53 1,130.53 100% Zone 50 (The Trails) 0.00 1,369.78 0.00 0%
Zone 51 (SJ Retail) 41,553.86 1,488.92 1,042.25 70%
Zone 52 (Graciella Court) 2,295.18 1,275.20 255.04 20%
Zone 53 (The Cove) 181,152.72 1,677.37 1,677.37 100%
Zone 54 (Santa Fe Apartments) 3,390.68 5,651.19 3,390.71 60% Zone 55 (The Cove) 173,860.68 1,679.86 1,259.89 75%
Zone 56 (SW Corner of 7th & Lyon -
Annexation Not Completed) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%
Zone 57 (7th Ave. East of Kirby) 2,912.32 910.25 182.05 20% Zone 58 (SE Corner of 7th & Lyon) 0.00 1,607.43 0.00 0% Zone 59 (Rite Aide) 49,326.96 2,216.36 1,773.09 80%
Zone 60 (Stater Bros) 0.00 2,128.69 0.00 0%
Zone 61 (Oostdam Dr. & Ivy Crest Dr.) 29,933.00 951.83 809.05 85% Zone 62 (Meadowbrook II) 91,374.42 1,603.09 1,603.09 100% Zone 63 (Palisades Ranch/Catalpa Park) 235,285.12 2,253.73 2,028.36 90% Zone 64 (The Enclave) 5,698.40 1,424.63 1,139.70 80%
Zone 65 (Cheyenne) 52,963.28 1,922.48 1,826.36 95%
Zone 66 (Palm/Cottonwood) 5,457.32 1,240.51 248.10 20%
Zone 67 (Park Avenue Estates) 39,942.70 1,521.67 1,141.25 75% Zone 68 (Shaver East of Los Banos) 6,805.60 1,237.43 680.59 55% Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 6
Zone
2026/27
Levy
Amount
2026/27
Maximum
Rate
2026/27
Actual
Rate
% of
Maximum
(1)
Zone 69 (Calvary Chapel) $0.00 $501.68 $0.00 0%
Zone 70 (Wateka/DeAnza) 0.00 1,678.06 0.00 0%
Zone 71 (Edelbrock) 0.00 3,289.65 0.00 0%
Zone 72 (Thayer Animal Hospital) 0.00 3,820.48 0.00 0%
Zone 73 (San Jacinto Villas) 10,285.34 1,437.51 718.76 50% Zone 74 (Ramona Crossings) 0.00 825.00 0.00 0%
Zone 75 (SJUSD Nutrition Center) 941.66 1,353.02 135.30 10% Zone 76 (Luz del Sol) 507,661.50 2,108.72 1,581.54 75%
Zone 77 (Kalpesh Homes) 6,061.50 1,347.44 134.74 10%
Zone 78 (Carolino Homes) 0.00 1,130.34 0.00 0%
Zone 79 (State Street Auto Body) 0.00 3,128.95 0.00 0%
Zone 80 (AutoZone) 0.00 3,616.76 0.00 0%
Zone 81 (Maravilla - Commercial -
Annexation Not Completed) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%
Zone 82 (SJ West Congregation) 0.00 3,517.62 0.00 0%
Zone 83 (790 S. State Street) 0.00 5,116.03 0.00 0%
Zone 84 (Parkside Medical Center) 0.00 1,106.97 0.00 0% Zone 85 (Gupta Medical Center) 4,720.46 3,685.02 1,289.76 35% Zone 86 (CVS Pharmacy) 30,419.32 3,157.85 2,999.95 95%
Zone 87 (County Animal Shelter -
Annexation Not Completed) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%
Zone 88 (Family Dollar) 11,795.26 2,792.45 2,233.96 80% Zone 89 (Kirby Village) 0.00 500.15 0.00 0%
Zone 90 (Circle K) 0.00 5,965.89 0.00 0%
Zone 91 (O’ Reilly Auto Parts) 1,766.70 4,298.62 429.86 10% Total $6,022,974.94
(1) Percentages are approximate.
(2) The actual rate is greater than the 2026/27 levy amount due to the total AU being less than one AU.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 7
5. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The following pages provide an estimate of the costs of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27 for each zone, to include the maximum amounts and actual amounts that will be levied. The City determines the percentage of the maximum amount to be levied in each zone based on the District’s budget. These costs can include a reserve fund to cover a six-month portion of maintenance and servicing costs as well as an amount of surplus or deficit in the improvement fund from a previous fiscal year.
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone: 1
Common Name/Location:
Sagecrest Development
(State/Chase/Sagecrest)
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied: 100%
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $93.13
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $93.13
Maximum Total $23,519.76
Actual Total $23,519.76
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $451.42
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $451.42
Maximum Total $112,403.26
Actual Total $112,403.26
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $32.88
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $32.88
Maximum Total $8,187.35
Actual Total $8,187.35
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $352.23
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $352.23
Maximum Total $88,956.33
Actual Total $88,956.33
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Maximum Total $0.00
Actual Total $0.00
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Maximum Total $0.00
Actual Total $0.00
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Maximum Total $0.00
Actual Total $0.00
Number of Units/Assessment Units 252.55
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $929.66
Zone Maximum $233,066.70
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $929.66
Adjustment Rounding 0.00
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $929.66
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied) $233,061.36
*3.55 AU not assessed for Park and
Landscape Maintenance
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
1A
Sagecrest Development
(State/Chase/Sagecrest)
100%
$137.55
$137.55
$825.30
$825.30
$415.31
$415.31
$2,491.86
$2,491.86
$30.23
$30.23
$181.40
$181.40
$327.45
$327.45
$1,964.68
$1,964.68
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
6 $910.54
$5,463.24
$910.54
0.00 $910.54
$5,463.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
2 Meridian Estates
(Washington/Meridian)
75%
$113.58
$85.19
$10,279.30
$7,709.48
$190.51
$142.88
$17,145.72
$12,859.29
$42.71
$32.03
$3,865.22
$2,898.91
$150.74
$113.05
$13,641.52
$10,231.14
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$50.24
$37.68
$4,546.58
$3,409.94
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
90.5 $547.77
$49,478.35
$410.83
(0.01)
$410.82
$37,105.94
*.50 AU not assessed for Park
Maintenance
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
3 San Jacinto Ranch
(Cottonwood/Kirby)
85%
$100.02
$85.02
$6,901.63
$5,866.38
$1,168.32
$993.07
$80,613.74
$68,521.68
$19.71
$16.75
$1,359.93
$1,155.94
$226.99
$192.94
$15,662.28
$13,312.94
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$35.73
$30.37
$2,465.55
$2,095.72
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
69 $1,550.77
$107,003.12
$1,318.15
(0.01)
$1,318.14
$90,950.28
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
4 Timothy Lane (Evans/Las
Rosas)
100%
$139.97
$139.97
$5,179.03
$5,179.03
$152.59
$152.59
$5,645.75
$5,645.75
$51.50
$51.50
$1,905.49
$1,905.49
$445.37
$445.37
$16,478.55
$16,478.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$49.49
$49.49
$1,831.11
$1,831.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
37 $838.92
$31,039.94
$838.92
0.00 $838.92
$31,038.56
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
5 Sunset Ranch (Ramona
Blvd/Savory Lane)
80%
$62.83
$50.27
$4,084.12
$3,267.29
$346.05
$276.84
$22,493.39
$17,994.71
$9.52
$7.62
$618.77
$495.01
$493.38
$394.70
$32,069.54
$25,655.63
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$42.65
$34.12
$2,772.28
$2,217.82
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
65 $954.43
$62,038.09
$763.55
(0.01)
$763.54
$49,628.80
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
6 Heritage Ranch
(Cottonwood/Palm)
100%
$101.32
$101.32
$6,687.41
$6,687.41
$144.19
$144.19
$9,516.65
$9,516.65
$203.71
$203.71
$13,445.06
$13,445.06
$453.05
$453.05
$29,901.48
$29,901.48
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$41.94
$41.94
$2,768.10
$2,768.10
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
66 $944.22
$62,318.71
$944.22
0.00 $944.22
$62,317.20
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
7 Tesoro (Cottonwood/Kirby)
85%
$84.77
$72.05
$21,107.42
$17,941.31
$504.83
$429.10
$125,702.29
$106,846.95
$49.49
$42.07
$12,322.89
$10,474.45
$363.81
$309.24
$90,588.69
$77,000.38
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.76
$40.59
$11,891.02
$10,107.37
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
249
$1,050.65
$261,612.31
$893.05
(0.01)
$893.04
$222,361.98
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
8 Meadowbrook/Solano
(Kirby/7th Street)
90%
$120.93
$108.84
$40,754.87
$36,679.38
$286.93
$258.24
$96,695.94
$87,026.35
$112.00
$100.80
$37,744.53
$33,970.08
$255.06
$229.55
$85,954.79
$77,359.31
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$51.01
$45.91
$17,190.96
$15,471.86
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
337
$825.94
$278,341.09
$743.34
0.00 $743.34
$250,498.84
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
9 Goldencrest (San Jacinto
St./Ramona Expr.)
85%
$90.58
$77.00
$20,109.42
$17,093.00
$170.40
$144.84
$37,829.85
$32,155.37
$139.38
$118.48
$30,942.95
$26,301.50
$530.10
$450.58
$117,681.21
$100,029.03
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$49.98
$42.48
$11,096.06
$9,431.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
222
$980.45
$217,659.48
$833.38
0.00 $833.38
$185,001.48
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
10A
Maravilla
80%
$55.46
$44.37
$5,102.24
$4,081.79
$337.15
$269.72
$31,017.35
$24,813.88
$15.70
$12.56
$1,444.29
$1,155.44
$82.64
$66.11
$7,602.65
$6,082.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$31.89
$25.51
$2,934.05
$2,347.24
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
92 $522.83
$48,100.58
$418.27
(0.01)
$418.26
$38,476.24
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
10B
Sendera
80%
$57.99
$46.39
$4,928.89
$3,943.11
$317.91
$254.33
$27,022.45
$21,617.96
$35.05
$28.04
$2,978.98
$2,383.18
$82.05
$65.64
$6,974.11
$5,579.29
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$29.84
$23.87
$2,536.33
$2,029.07
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
85 $522.83
$44,440.75
$418.27
(0.01)
$418.26
$35,548.70
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
11 Sandalwood (Cottonwood
Ave.)
85%
$86.77
$73.75
$10,933.00
$9,293.05
$800.61
$680.52
$100,877.21
$85,745.63
$22.67
$19.27
$2,857.04
$2,428.48
$324.44
$275.77
$40,879.35
$34,747.45
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$76.48
$65.00
$9,635.94
$8,190.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
126
$1,310.97
$165,182.54
$1,114.33
(0.01)
$1,114.32
$140,401.80
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
12 Windmill Plaza
(Esplanade/Santa Fe)
65%
$125.56
$81.61
$3,133.86
$2,037.01
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$57.61
$37.45
$1,437.91
$934.64
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
24.96 $183.16
$4,571.77
$119.06
0.00 $119.06
$2,971.60
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
13 Park Meadows (7th
Street/Lyon)
80%
$119.83
$95.87
$20,371.44
$16,297.15
$649.03
$519.23
$110,335.33
$88,268.26
$331.50
$265.20
$56,355.06
$45,084.05
$107.36
$85.89
$18,251.90
$14,601.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$43.92
$35.14
$7,466.83
$5,973.47
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
170
$1,251.65
$212,780.56
$1,001.32
0.00 $1,001.32
$170,217.60
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
14 MSJC (Eagle Dr/Country
Village Dr)
80%
$916.03
$732.82
$916.03
$732.82
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 $916.03
$916.03
$732.82
0.00 $732.82
$732.80
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
15 Willow Creek Apts. (S.
Santa Fe/Esplanade)
60%
$1,987.06
$1,192.24
$1,987.06
$1,192.24
$4,557.51
$2,734.51
$4,557.51
$2,734.51
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,629.42
$1,577.65
$2,629.42
$1,577.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,314.71
$788.83
$1,314.71
$788.83
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 $10,488.71
$10,488.71
$6,293.23
(0.01)
$6,293.22
$6,293.18
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
16 La Perla (7th Street/Santa
Fe)
65%
$106.47
$69.21
$2,022.95
$1,314.92
$213.84
$138.99
$4,062.87
$2,640.86
$25.09
$16.31
$476.67
$309.83
$270.09
$175.56
$5,131.76
$3,335.64
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$202.56
$131.67
$3,848.73
$2,501.67
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
19 $818.05
$15,542.96
$531.73
(0.01)
$531.72
$10,102.30
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
17 Cloverdale (Evans/Katrina
Lane)
50%
$76.52
$38.26
$2,295.53
$1,147.76
$173.47
$86.73
$5,204.00
$2,602.00
$40.67
$20.34
$1,220.18
$610.09
$416.32
$208.16
$12,489.71
$6,244.85
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$69.39
$34.70
$2,081.71
$1,040.86
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
30 $776.37
$23,291.12
$388.19
(0.01)
$388.18
$11,644.80
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
18 500 S. State Street
55%
$61.58
$33.87
$1,261.70
$693.94
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$59.36
$32.65
$1,216.20
$668.91
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
20.49 $120.93
$2,477.91
$66.51
(0.01)
$66.50
$1,362.80
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
19-1
Walmart
(State/Idyllwild,San
Jacinto/Commonwealth)
50%
$244.41
$122.20
$17,905.21
$8,952.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$128.53
$64.27
$9,416.34
$4,708.17
$888.22
$444.11
$65,070.86
$32,535.43
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$110.12
$55.06
$8,067.20
$4,033.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
73.26 $1,371.27
$100,459.60
$685.64
0.00 $685.64
$50,229.36
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
19-2
Cali Coffee – Santana’s
(State/Idyllwild,San
Jacinto/Commonwealth)
60%
$874.55
$524.73
$3,358.26
$2,014.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$837.34
$502.40
$3,215.37
$1,929.22
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
3.84 $1,711.88
$6,573.64
$1,027.13
(0.01)
$1,027.12
$3,944.14
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
20 Durango (Main/Ramona
Exp.)
100%
$140.45
$140.45
$18,680.30
$18,680.30
$452.81
$452.81
$60,224.37
$60,224.37
$84.48
$84.48
$11,235.98
$11,235.98
$387.36
$387.36
$51,518.69
$51,518.69
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.86
$47.86
$6,364.95
$6,364.95
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
133
$1,112.96
$148,024.29
$1,112.96
0.00 $1,112.96
$148,021.02
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
21 Arterra (Palm/7th Street)
100%
$137.58
$137.58
$20,087.19
$20,087.19
$319.72
$319.72
$46,678.64
$46,678.64
$83.40
$83.40
$12,176.07
$12,176.07
$88.45
$88.45
$12,914.18
$12,914.18
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$68.04
$68.04
$9,933.99
$9,933.99
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
146
$697.19
$101,790.06
$697.19
(0.01)
$697.18
$101,785.36
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
22 Park Hill (Park/Hewitt)
80%
$115.56
$92.44
$15,484.46
$12,387.57
$234.78
$187.82
$31,460.45
$25,168.36
$475.31
$380.24
$63,691.01
$50,952.81
$403.30
$322.64
$54,042.80
$43,234.24
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$43.66
$34.93
$5,849.97
$4,679.97
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
134
$1,272.60
$170,528.69
$1,018.08
0.00 $1,018.08
$136,420.04
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
23 Summerfield Ranch (7th
Street/Palm)
45%
$146.19
$65.79
$11,987.84
$5,394.53
$111.60
$50.22
$9,151.40
$4,118.13
$80.98
$36.44
$6,640.69
$2,988.31
$486.04
$218.72
$39,855.04
$17,934.77
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$60.34
$27.15
$4,948.18
$2,226.68
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
82 $885.16
$72,583.14
$398.32
0.00 $398.32
$32,660.60
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
24 El Toro Market (670 S. State
Street)
55%
$174.81
$96.14
$2,087.21
$1,147.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$125.48
$69.01
$1,498.19
$824.01
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
11.94 $300.28
$3,585.40
$165.16
0.00 $165.16
$1,971.94
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
25 Stallions Crossing
(Cottonwood/Lyon)
95%
$191.96
$182.36
$19,771.80
$18,783.21
$277.62
$263.74
$28,594.73
$27,164.99
$140.34
$133.32
$14,454.95
$13,732.20
$164.44
$156.22
$16,937.19
$16,090.33
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$73.99
$70.29
$7,620.95
$7,239.91
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
103
$848.35
$87,379.63
$805.93
(0.01)
$805.92
$83,007.70
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
26 The Ranch
(Cottonwood/Cawston/7th
Street)
85%
$120.65
$102.55
$35,591.53
$30,252.80
$491.19
$417.51
$144,900.35
$123,165.30
$69.56
$59.13
$20,520.63
$17,442.54
$330.46
$280.89
$97,484.23
$82,861.59
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$45.33
$38.53
$13,372.05
$11,366.24
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
295
$1,057.18
$311,868.79
$898.60
0.00 $898.60
$265,075.20
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
27 Potter Ranch (Ramona
Blvd/Potter Rd.)
95%
$138.34
$131.42
$36,382.84
$34,563.70
$423.37
$402.20
$111,346.52
$105,779.20
$41.79
$39.70
$10,990.05
$10,440.54
$275.34
$261.57
$72,413.80
$68,793.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.80
$45.41
$12,571.07
$11,942.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
263
$926.63
$243,704.28
$880.30
0.00 $880.30
$231,508.38
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
28 Mountain View Business
Park (Main Street/Dillon
Ave.)
30%
$656.24
$196.87
$629.99
$189.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,771.84
$531.55
$1,700.97
$510.29
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.96 $2,428.08
$2,330.96
$728.42
0.00 $728.42
$699.24
*The amount levied is less than the
actual rate due to the assignment
of .96 AU, which is not a whole AU.
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
29 Creekside
(Cottonwood/Palm Ave.)
100%
$152.73
$152.73
$21,839.68
$21,839.68
$371.81
$371.81
$53,169.53
$53,169.53
$97.72
$97.72
$13,974.46
$13,974.46
$424.76
$424.76
$60,741.21
$60,741.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$45.18
$45.18
$6,460.44
$6,460.44
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
143
$1,092.21
$156,185.32
$1,092.21
(0.01)
$1,092.20
$156,181.74
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
30 Almaden (Lyon/DeAnza
Ave.)
75%
$115.59
$86.69
$10,172.19
$7,629.14
$419.72
$314.79
$36,935.68
$27,701.76
$128.90
$96.67
$11,343.11
$8,507.33
$581.94
$436.46
$51,210.93
$38,408.20
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$64.13
$48.10
$5,643.33
$4,232.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
88 $1,310.29
$115,305.24
$982.72
0.00 $982.72
$86,475.84
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
31 Belicia
(Washington/Mountain
Ave.)
100%
$112.18
$112.18
$6,843.23
$6,843.23
$247.77
$247.77
$15,114.14
$15,114.14
$8.43
$8.43
$514.28
$514.28
$754.06
$754.06
$45,997.55
$45,997.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$73.64
$73.64
$4,492.09
$4,492.09
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
61 $1,196.09
$72,961.29
$1,196.09
(0.01)
$1,196.08
$72,959.66
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
32 Cottonwood Ranch
(Cottonwood/Kirby Ave.)
95%
$131.10
$124.54
$17,173.88
$16,315.19
$476.32
$452.50
$62,397.87
$59,277.98
$49.56
$47.08
$6,492.13
$6,167.52
$454.40
$431.68
$59,526.36
$56,550.04
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$44.61
$42.38
$5,843.87
$5,551.68
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
131
$1,155.99
$151,434.11
$1,098.19
(0.01)
$1,098.18
$143,858.96
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
33 Daybreak
(Esplanade/Meridian Ave.)
95%
$123.46
$117.28
$12,715.93
$12,080.14
$536.27
$509.46
$55,235.78
$52,473.99
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$46.90
$44.56
$4,830.77
$4,589.23
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$83.08
$78.93
$8,557.20
$8,129.34
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
103
$789.71
$81,339.69
$750.22
0.00 $750.22
$77,270.60
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
34 Palmilla
(Washington/Arroyo Viejo)
100%
$104.03
$104.03
$6,657.81
$6,657.81
$540.30
$540.30
$34,579.31
$34,579.31
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.25
$47.25
$3,023.93
$3,023.93
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$85.72
$85.72
$5,486.01
$5,486.01
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
64 $777.30
$49,747.06
$777.30
0.00 $777.30
$49,744.64
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
35 Terragon
(Washington/Berringer)
100%
$75.03
$75.03
$5,477.47
$5,477.47
$548.11
$548.11
$40,011.99
$40,011.99
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.95
$47.95
$3,500.01
$3,500.01
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$87.13
$87.13
$6,360.50
$6,360.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
73 $758.22
$55,349.96
$758.22
0.00 $758.22
$55,347.14
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
36 Cypress
(Washington/Arroyo Viejo)
80%
$104.43
$83.55
$8,772.24
$7,017.79
$539.06
$431.24
$45,280.66
$36,224.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.16
$37.73
$3,961.21
$3,168.97
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$86.10
$68.88
$7,232.71
$5,786.17
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
84 $776.75
$65,246.83
$621.40
0.00 $621.40
$52,195.92
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
37 Cypress/Daybreak
(Washington/Villines)
90%
$109.05
$98.15
$5,125.35
$4,612.82
$538.62
$484.75
$25,314.94
$22,783.44
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.10
$42.39
$2,213.81
$1,992.43
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$91.42
$82.28
$4,296.68
$3,867.01
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
47 $786.19
$36,950.78
$707.57
(0.01)
$707.56
$33,254.38
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
38 Coventry Acres (Palm
Ave/De Anza Dr)
100%
$88.77
$88.77
$17,398.83
$17,398.83
$518.48
$518.48
$101,622.14
$101,622.14
$22.24
$22.24
$4,359.08
$4,359.08
$232.31
$232.31
$45,533.48
$45,533.48
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$44.92
$44.92
$8,803.37
$8,803.37
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
196
$906.72
$177,716.90
$906.72
0.00 $906.72
$177,709.28
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
39 The Trails
(Washington/Meridian)
95%
$107.69
$102.31
$9,907.83
$9,412.44
$527.20
$500.84
$48,502.17
$46,077.06
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$46.11
$43.81
$4,242.36
$4,030.24
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$85.19
$80.93
$7,837.24
$7,445.37
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
92 $766.19
$70,489.59
$727.88
0.00 $727.88
$66,961.28
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
40 Winners Circle (7th
Street/Kirby)
50%
$269.22
$134.61
$3,499.81
$1,749.91
$188.13
$94.07
$2,445.75
$1,222.87
$27.22
$13.61
$353.82
$176.91
$289.45
$144.73
$3,762.85
$1,881.43
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$217.07
$108.54
$2,821.96
$1,410.98
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
13 $991.09
$12,884.18
$495.55
(0.01)
$495.54
$6,441.50
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
41 Mosaico (Lyon Ave)
90%
$98.51
$88.66
$8,964.56
$8,068.10
$474.16
$426.74
$43,148.29
$38,833.46
$54.23
$48.81
$4,935.09
$4,441.58
$209.25
$188.32
$19,041.55
$17,137.40
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$407.54
$366.78
$37,085.74
$33,377.17
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
91 $1,243.68
$113,175.23
$1,119.32
0.00 $1,119.32
$101,854.48
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
42 Santa Bella
(Commonwealth Ave.)
85%
$143.45
$121.93
$5,164.24
$4,389.61
$529.49
$450.07
$19,061.58
$16,202.35
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$46.31
$39.37
$1,667.31
$1,417.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$96.00
$81.60
$3,456.03
$2,937.62
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
36 $815.25
$29,349.16
$692.97
(0.01)
$692.96
$24,945.84
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
43 Remington/Lyndon Trails
(Esplanade Ave.)
95%
$99.48
$94.51
$20,195.04
$19,185.29
$500.42
$475.40
$101,585.39
$96,506.12
$169.66
$161.18
$34,440.96
$32,718.91
$169.77
$161.28
$34,463.28
$32,740.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$46.68
$44.35
$9,476.19
$9,002.38
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
203
$986.01
$200,160.87
$936.71
(0.01)
$936.70
$190,146.04
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
44 Lyon/Shadow Canyon Trail
(Lyon Ave.)
0%
$134.87
$0.00
$13,487.38
$0.00
$189.66
$0.00
$18,965.55
$0.00
$282.21
$0.00
$28,221.06
$0.00
$146.99
$0.00
$14,698.85
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$53.10
$0.00
$5,309.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
100
$806.82
$80,682.38
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
45 Tamarisk (Cottonwood
Ave.)
95%
$94.35
$89.63
$23,870.86
$22,677.31
$817.23
$776.37
$206,760.19
$196,422.18
$61.01
$57.96
$15,436.30
$14,664.49
$333.62
$316.94
$84,405.83
$80,185.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$45.76
$43.48
$11,578.39
$10,999.47
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
253
$1,351.98
$342,051.56
$1,284.38
0.00 $1,284.38
$324,938.02
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
46 Parkside Village (Sanderson
Ave.)
100%
$95.41
$95.41
$13,357.99
$13,357.99
$253.00
$253.00
$35,419.46
$35,419.46
$191.05
$191.05
$26,746.77
$26,746.77
$513.27
$513.27
$71,857.57
$71,857.57
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.01
$47.01
$6,581.49
$6,581.49
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
140
$1,099.74
$153,963.29
$1,099.74
0.00 $1,099.74
$153,958.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
47 Maravilla Estates (Ramona
Expressway)
0%
$65.47
$0.00
$14,599.51
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$261.23
$0.00
$58,254.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$87.52
$0.00
$19,516.42
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
223
$414.22
$92,370.47
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
48 San Jacinto Valley Academy
(San Jacinto Ave.)
80%
$1,398.20
$1,118.56
$671.14
$536.91
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,573.72
$2,058.97
$1,235.38
$988.31
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,798.07
$1,438.46
$863.07
$690.46
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.48 $5,769.99
$2,769.59
$4,615.99
(0.01)
$4,615.98
$2,215.64
*The amount levied is less than the
actual rate due to the assignment
of .48 AU, which is not a whole AU.
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
49 Pheasant Run (Main
Street/Camino Los Banos)
100%
$109.06
$109.06
$10,847.33
$10,847.33
$239.93
$239.93
$21,833.63
$21,833.63
$135.74
$135.74
$13,500.36
$13,500.36
$573.10
$573.10
$57,000.36
$57,000.36
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$72.70
$72.70
$7,230.98
$7,230.98
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
99.46 $1,130.53
$110,412.65
$1,130.53
(0.01)
$1,130.52
$110,409.76
*1 AU not assessed for Park
Maintenance.
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
50 The Trails (Blodgett St.)
0%
$106.66
$0.00
$62,149.09
$0.00
$774.03
$0.00
$451,001.35
$0.00
$212.89
$0.00
$124,044.88
$0.00
$231.81
$0.00
$135,068.38
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$44.39
$0.00
$25,866.75
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
582.67
$1,369.78
$798,130.44
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
51 SJ Retail
(Esplanade/Sanderson)
70%
$323.46
$226.42
$12,896.45
$9,027.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$398.66
$279.06
$15,894.55
$11,126.19
$346.29
$242.41
$13,806.77
$9,664.74
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$420.51
$294.35
$16,765.55
$11,735.89
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
39.87 $1,488.92
$59,363.33
$1,042.25
(0.01)
$1,042.24
$41,553.86
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
52 Graciella Court (6th Street)
20%
$379.68
$75.94
$3,417.15
$683.43
$263.46
$52.69
$2,371.11
$474.22
$46.62
$9.32
$419.57
$83.91
$292.72
$58.54
$2,634.50
$526.90
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$292.72
$58.54
$2,634.50
$526.90
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
9 $1,275.20
$11,476.83
$255.04
0.00 $255.04
$2,295.18
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
53 The Cove (Cottonwood Ave.)
100%
$122.57
$122.57
$13,237.91
$13,237.91
$514.57
$514.57
$55,573.33
$55,573.33
$597.29
$597.29
$64,506.90
$64,506.90
$405.11
$405.11
$43,751.41
$43,751.41
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$37.84
$37.84
$4,086.49
$4,086.49
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
108
$1,677.37
$181,156.05
$1,677.37
(0.01)
$1,677.36
$181,152.72
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
54 Santa Fe Apartments (Santa
Fe Ave.)
60%
$1,004.91
$602.95
$1,004.91
$602.95
$1,659.41
$995.64
$1,659.41
$995.64
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,866.79
$1,120.07
$1,866.79
$1,120.07
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,120.08
$672.05
$1,120.08
$672.05
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 $5,651.19
$5,651.19
$3,390.71
(0.01)
$3,390.70
$3,390.68
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
55 The Cove (Cottonwood Ave.)
75%
$126.56
$94.92
$17,464.63
$13,098.47
$514.19
$385.64
$70,957.57
$53,218.18
$596.83
$447.63
$82,363.09
$61,772.32
$404.79
$303.59
$55,861.39
$41,896.04
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$37.49
$28.12
$5,173.64
$3,880.23
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
138
$1,679.86
$231,820.32
$1,259.89
(0.01)
$1,259.88
$173,860.68
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
56 SW Corner of 7th & Lyon
(Annexation Not
Completed)
0%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
N/A
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
57 7th Ave. East of Kirby
(Sanderson Ave.)
20%
$285.14
$57.03
$4,562.25
$912.45
$298.95
$59.79
$4,783.16
$956.63
$45.91
$9.18
$734.50
$146.90
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$280.25
$56.05
$4,484.07
$896.81
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
16 $910.25
$14,563.98
$182.05
(0.01)
$182.04
$2,912.32
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
58 SE Corner of 7th & Lyon
(Kirby St.)
0%
$139.77
$0.00
$7,268.08
$0.00
$232.77
$0.00
$12,103.82
$0.00
$205.78
$0.00
$10,700.48
$0.00
$989.02
$0.00
$51,429.03
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$40.10
$0.00
$2,085.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
52 $1,607.43
$83,586.53
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
59 Rite Aide (State St./Ramona
Expwy)
80%
$332.00
$265.60
$9,236.31
$7,389.05
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$963.24
$770.59
$26,797.38
$21,437.91
$518.13
$414.50
$14,414.28
$11,531.42
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$402.99
$322.39
$11,211.20
$8,968.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
27.82 $2,216.36
$61,659.18
$1,773.09
(0.01)
$1,773.08
$49,326.96
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
60 Stater Bros (State
St./Ramona Expwy)
0%
$243.72
$0.00
$9,746.34
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$790.53
$0.00
$31,613.30
$0.00
$684.03
$0.00
$27,354.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$410.42
$0.00
$16,412.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
39.99 $2,128.69
$85,126.37
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
61 Oostdam Dr. & Ivy Crest Dr.
(Sanderson Ave./Kirby St.)
85%
$179.36
$152.46
$6,636.50
$5,641.03
$163.65
$139.10
$6,054.88
$5,146.65
$55.94
$47.55
$2,069.77
$1,759.30
$464.42
$394.76
$17,183.49
$14,605.97
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$88.46
$75.19
$3,272.89
$2,781.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
37 $951.83
$35,217.54
$809.05
(0.01)
$809.04
$29,933.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
62 Meadowbrook II (Esplanade
Ave./Kirby St.)
100%
$150.81
$150.81
$8,596.32
$8,596.32
$139.53
$139.53
$7,953.06
$7,953.06
$333.50
$333.50
$19,009.43
$19,009.43
$905.81
$905.81
$51,631.44
$51,631.44
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$73.43
$73.43
$4,185.66
$4,185.66
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
57 $1,603.09
$91,375.91
$1,603.09
(0.01)
$1,603.08
$91,374.42
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
63 Palisades Ranch (Catalpa
Park) (Seventh St./Crawson
Ave.)
90%
$106.15
$95.54
$12,313.66
$11,082.29
$98.82
$88.94
$11,463.43
$10,317.09
$1,429.79
$1,286.81
$165,855.23
$149,269.71
$546.14
$491.53
$63,352.80
$57,017.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$72.82
$65.54
$8,447.56
$7,602.81
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
116
$2,253.73
$261,432.69
$2,028.36
0.00 $2,028.36
$235,285.12
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
64 The Enclave (Sanderson
Ave./Lyon Ave.)
80%
$600.57
$480.46
$3,002.86
$2,402.29
$244.02
$195.21
$1,220.08
$976.07
$189.61
$151.69
$948.03
$758.43
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$390.43
$312.34
$1,952.15
$1,561.72
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
5 $1,424.63
$7,123.13
$1,139.70
0.00 $1,139.70
$5,698.40
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
65 Cheyenne (Sanderson
Ave./Kirby St.)
95%
$172.90
$164.25
$5,013.99
$4,763.29
$216.68
$205.85
$6,283.75
$5,969.57
$478.82
$454.88
$13,885.68
$13,191.40
$936.98
$890.13
$27,172.28
$25,813.67
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$117.11
$111.26
$3,396.28
$3,226.47
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
29 $1,922.48
$55,752.00
$1,826.36
0.00 $1,826.36
$52,963.28
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
66 Palm/Cottonwood (Palm
Ave./De Anza Dr.)
20%
$221.10
$44.22
$4,864.15
$972.83
$238.59
$47.72
$5,249.00
$1,049.80
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$650.69
$130.14
$14,315.11
$2,863.02
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$130.14
$26.03
$2,863.02
$572.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
22 $1,240.51
$27,291.29
$248.10
0.00 $248.10
$5,457.32
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
67 Park Avenue Estates (Hewitt
St.)
75%
$193.21
$144.91
$6,762.49
$5,071.87
$180.83
$135.62
$6,329.03
$4,746.77
$362.30
$271.72
$12,680.48
$9,510.36
$661.33
$496.00
$23,146.50
$17,359.87
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$124.00
$93.00
$4,339.86
$3,254.89
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
35 $1,521.67
$53,258.35
$1,141.25
(0.01)
$1,141.24
$39,942.70
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
68 Shaver East of Los Banos
(Hewitt St.)
55%
$352.71
$193.99
$3,527.12
$1,939.92
$307.15
$168.93
$3,071.51
$1,689.33
$116.83
$64.26
$1,168.35
$642.59
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$460.73
$253.40
$4,607.34
$2,534.04
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
10 $1,237.43
$12,374.32
$680.59
(0.01)
$680.58
$6,805.60
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
69 Calvary Chapel (Lyon Ave.)
0%
$136.28
$0.00
$5,895.38
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$178.97
$0.00
$7,742.29
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$186.43
$0.00
$8,064.86
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
43.26 $501.68
$21,702.52
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
70 Wateka/DeAnza (Ramona
Blvd.)
0%
$195.19
$0.00
$2,147.04
$0.00
$204.07
$0.00
$2,244.72
$0.00
$110.08
$0.00
$1,210.86
$0.00
$890.47
$0.00
$9,795.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$278.27
$0.00
$3,060.98
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
11 $1,678.06
$18,458.71
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
71 Edelbrock (Esplanade
Ave./Buena Vista St.)
0%
$423.06
$0.00
$3,020.67
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$414.52
$0.00
$2,959.66
$0.00
$1,671.86
$0.00
$11,937.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$780.20
$0.00
$5,570.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
7.14 $3,289.65
$23,488.09
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
72 Thayer Animal Hospital
(State St./Seventh St.)
0%
$333.82
$0.00
$1,442.10
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,360.02
$0.00
$10,195.27
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,126.64
$0.00
$4,867.10
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
4.32 $3,820.48
$16,504.47
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
73 San Jacinto Villas (Santa Fe
Ave.)
50%
$116.96
$58.48
$1,673.75
$836.88
$826.47
$413.24
$11,826.85
$5,913.43
$65.53
$32.77
$937.79
$468.89
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$428.54
$214.27
$6,132.43
$3,066.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
14.31 $1,437.51
$20,570.82
$718.76
0.00 $718.76
$10,285.34
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
74 Ramona Crossings (State
St./Ramona Blvd.)
0%
$147.61
$0.00
$2,032.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$141.93
$0.00
$1,954.31
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$535.47
$0.00
$7,373.40
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
13.77 $825.00
$11,360.24
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
75 SJUSD Nutrition Center
(Cottonwood Ave./State St.)
10%
$487.24
$48.72
$3,391.16
$339.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$865.78
$86.58
$6,025.82
$602.58
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
6.96 $1,353.02
$9,416.98
$135.30
0.00 $135.30
$941.66
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
76 Luz del Sol (Ramona
Exwy./Ramona Blvd./Bridge
Rd.)
75%
$76.36
$57.27
$24,512.27
$18,384.20
$927.20
$695.40
$297,630.47
$223,222.85
$480.16
$360.12
$154,131.99
$115,599.00
$557.08
$417.81
$178,822.75
$134,117.06
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$67.92
$50.94
$21,802.51
$16,351.88
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
321
$2,108.72
$676,899.99
$1,581.54
0.00 $1,581.54
$507,661.50
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
77 Kalpesh Homes (Ramona
Blvd./Savi St. - Lyon Ave./De
Anza Dr.)
10%
$154.19
$15.42
$6,938.57
$693.86
$170.40
$17.04
$7,667.98
$766.80
$273.11
$27.31
$12,290.15
$1,229.02
$605.84
$60.58
$27,262.93
$2,726.29
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$143.90
$14.39
$6,475.29
$647.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
45 $1,347.44
$60,634.92
$134.74
0.00 $134.74
$6,061.50
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
78 Carolino Homes – (Shaver
and Anda Loop)
0%
$299.42
$0.00
$4,191.83
$0.00
$302.58
$0.00
$4,236.18
$0.00
$139.30
$0.00
$1,950.13
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$389.04
$0.00
$5,446.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
14 $1,130.34
$15,824.70
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
79 State Street Auto Body
(Lyon Ave./De Anza Dr.)
0%
$721.37
$0.00
$2,055.91
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,407.58
$0.00
$6,861.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2.85 $3,128.95
$8,917.51
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
80 AutoZone (San Jacinto Ave.)
0%
$545.12
$0.00
$1,619.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$224.00
$0.00
$665.29
$0.00
$949.21
$0.00
$2,819.16
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,898.43
$0.00
$5,638.33
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2.97 $3,616.76
$10,741.78
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
81 Maravilla - Commercial
(Annexation Not
Completed)
0%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
N/A
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
82 SJ West Congregation
0%
$825.39
$0.00
$2,921.88
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$715.00
$0.00
$2,531.08
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,977.23
$0.00
$6,999.40
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
3.54 $3,517.62
$12,452.36
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
83 790 S. State Street
0%
$535.99
$0.00
$1,318.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$224.59
$0.00
$552.49
$0.00
$2,488.83
$0.00
$6,122.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,866.62
$0.00
$4,591.89
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2.46 $5,116.03
$12,585.44
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
84 Parkside Medical Center
0%
$105.93
$0.00
$5,122.54
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$381.56
$0.00
$18,452.43
$0.00
$515.41
$0.00
$24,925.22
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$104.07
$0.00
$5,032.98
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
48.36 $1,106.97
$53,533.17
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
85 Gupta Medical Center
35%
$533.35
$186.67
$1,952.07
$683.22
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$361.43
$126.50
$1,322.84
$463.00
$1,594.42
$558.05
$5,835.57
$2,042.45
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,195.81
$418.53
$4,376.68
$1,531.84
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
3.66 $3,685.02
$13,487.16
$1,289.76
0.00 $1,289.76
$4,720.46
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
86 CVS Pharmacy (Sanderson
Ave.)
95%
$584.49
$555.27
$5,926.75
$5,630.42
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,555.16
$1,477.40
$15,769.33
$14,980.86
$610.92
$580.37
$6,194.69
$5,884.95
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$407.28
$386.91
$4,129.79
$3,923.30
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
10.14 $3,157.85
$32,020.56
$2,999.95
(0.01)
$2,999.94
$30,419.32
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
87 County Animal Shelter
(Annexation Not
Completed)
0%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
N/A
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
88 Family Dollar (San Jacinto
Ave.)
80%
$307.71
$246.17
$1,624.73
$1,299.78
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$513.28
$410.62
$2,710.10
$2,168.08
$597.95
$478.36
$3,157.20
$2,525.76
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,101.49
$881.20
$5,815.89
$4,652.71
$272.01
$217.61
$1,436.21
$1,148.97
5.28 $2,792.45
$14,744.14
$2,233.96
0.00 $2,233.96
$11,795.26
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
89 Kirby Village (Portal Dr. and
S. Kirby St)
0%
$133.00
$0.00
$4,787.82
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$98.69
$0.00
$3,552.72
$0.00
$76.20
$0.00
$2,743.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$140.37
$0.00
$5,053.22
$0.00
$51.90
$0.00
$1,868.40
$0.00
36 $500.15
$18,005.28
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
90 Circle K (Sanderson Ave.)
0%
$331.32
$0.00
$1,659.93
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,971.48
$0.00
$14,887.09
$0.00
$1,135.84
$0.00
$5,690.54
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,009.63
$0.00
$5,058.26
$0.00
$517.62
$0.00
$2,593.28
$0.00
5.01 $5,965.89
$29,889.10
$0.00
0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:
Common Name/Location:
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
91 O’ Reilly Auto Parts (San
Jacinto Ave.)
10%
$461.71
$46.17
$1,897.64
$189.76
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,585.97
$258.60
$10,628.34
$1,062.83
$199.77
$19.98
$821.07
$82.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$783.43
$78.34
$3,219.89
$321.99
$267.73
$26.77
$1,100.37
$110.04
4.11 $4,298.62
$17,667.32
$429.86
0.00 $429.86
$1,766.70
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 8
6. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
6.1 Method of Apportionment
The net amount to be assessed upon parcels within the District is apportioned by a formula and method designed to fairly distribute such amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefit to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements within the District.
The maintenance and servicing of public landscaping, lighting, park facilities and street trees installed and constructed in public places in the City provides a special benefit which is received by each and every lot or parcel within the specified zones of benefit in the District. Landscaping and street trees within the District enhance the aesthetic appeal of parcels within the landscaping and street tree zones. Such landscaping improves erosion resistance and dust control. Street lights improve ingress and egress of such lots or parcels by illuminating access after sunset. Such street lights, by so improving ingress and egress, improve the security of such lots or parcels by improving the nighttime visibility of such lots or parcels and improve the access of emergency vehicles thereto, and in the case of commercial lots or parcels, facilitate the opening and operation of business uses after sunset.
The primary benefits of landscaping and street trees are as set forth below.
1. Improved aesthetic appeal of nearby parcels.
2. Green space within the urban environment.
3. Enhances wind breaks.
4. Improved erosion resistance.
5. Improved dust control.
6. Tends to instill a sense of pride within the neighborhood.
7. The enhancement of the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits.
The primary benefits of municipal parks are as set forth below.
1. Designated sites where children may gather to play without danger from traffic.
2. Designated sites where adult, youth and family activities can take place (i.e., picnics, baseball and softball leagues, soccer leagues, other athletic activities, art festivals, animal shows and training, etc.)
3. Green space and open space within the urban environment.
4. Availability of public restrooms.
5. The enhancement of the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 9
The primary benefits of street lighting are set forth below:
1. Improvement to traffic circulation and reduction in nighttime accidents and attendant human misery and decrease in personal property loss.
2. The deterrence of crime and the aid to police protection.
3. Promotion of business during nighttime hours.
4. Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways.
5. The improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see, which helps people safely find their way.
6. Improved ingress and egress to lots and parcels.
7. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and reduced damage to improvements.
8. The enhancement to the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits.
6.2 Assessment Formula
The basic formula used to calculate the amount spread to each lot or parcel within the District for each type of improvement or facility starts with an AU. The basic AU is given a value of one (1) for a single-family residential parcel. From this base, the remaining land use types are related according to their equivalent special benefit within a zone or future annexation. The purpose of this formula is to fairly equate special benefit conferred on property with differing land uses for each type of improvement or facility within a zone (e.g., single-family residential versus commercial office versus vacant property, for street lighting).
6.3 Assessment Unit Method
The following table shows the assessment formula using the AU method for common land uses:
Land Use
Landscaping
Assessment
Formula
Lighting
Assessment
Formula
Park
Assessment
Formula
Graffiti
Removal
Drainage
Assessment
Formula
Residential
Single Family
1.0 AU per
Residential Unit
1.0 AU per
Residential
Unit
1.0 AU per
Residential Unit
1.0 AU per
Residential Unit
1.0 AU per
Residential
Unit
Commercial/
Industrial
3.0 AU per
Assessable Acre
3.0 AU per
Assessable
Acre
3.0 AU per
Assessable Acre
3.0 AU per
Assessable Acre
3.0 AU per
Assessable
Acre
Apartments 0.6 AU per Parcel 0.6 AU per
Parcel
0.6 AU per
Parcel
0.6 AU per
Parcel
0.6 AU per
Parcel
Public Schools 0.0 AU per Parcel
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
0.0 AU per
Parcel
0.5 AU per
Assessable Acre
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
Churches 0.5 AU per
Assessable Acre
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
0.5 AU per
Assessable Acre
0.5 AU per
Assessable Acre
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 10
6.4 Consumer Price Index (CPI) Inflation
The original assessment formula states that the maximum assessments will be increased annually based on the change in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County CPI as of January published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; provided, however, that any annual increase shall not exceed seven and one-half percent (7.5%).
In January 2018, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) updated their geographic areas for computing CPI.
Previously, the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County index was made up of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura counties. The BLS divided this index into two areas; one that represents Los Angeles and Orange counties (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim) and another that represents Riverside and San Bernardino counties (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario).
On June 19, 2018 a resolution was adopted by the City determining that the CPI to be used for future calculation of the maximum assessments is the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Index beginning with the Fiscal Year 2019/20 calculation.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 11
7. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The assessment diagrams for each zone have been prepared in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and are on file with the City. The lines and dimensions shown on maps of the County Assessor for the current year are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. All parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on the assessor’s maps.
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 12
8. ASSESSMENT ROLL
A listing of assessor’s parcels subject to the assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27, along with the assessment amounts, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. Based on County Assessor’s secured roll data, current assessor’s parcels, including corrected and/or new assessor’s parcels, will be submitted and/or resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The annual assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be determined in accordance with the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this report. Therefore, if a single assessor’s parcel has a status change in development, other land use change, or subdivides into multiple assessor’s parcels, the charge amounts applied to each of the new assessor’s parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method outlined in the method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment amount
Parcel listing currently available with City Clerk or on City website upon adoption June 2, 2026
TO: City Council
REQUESTED
BY:
Stuart McKibbin
APPROVED
BY:
Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT:
The Thomsen Company, Inc. Professional Services Agreement EWA 13 for San Jacinto MDP Line E-2 Storm Drain Improvement Project (CIP# 15-003)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions:
1. APPROVE the professional services agreement to The Thomsen Company, Inc. for the sum of $19,675;
2. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute the professional services agreement.
BACKGROUND:
The City of San Jacinto has been planning and designing storm drain improvements along State Street from Menlo Avenue to the Line E channel south of 9
th Street (Line E-2 Storm Drain Improvements). Line E-2 Storm Drain Improvements will consist of an underground storm drain ranging in pipe diameter from 30 to 72 inches. The planning and design involve coordination with the City of Hemet and all utility purveyors as major utility conflicts have been identified. A tri-party funding agreement has been executed with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCD).
During the design of the storm drain improvements, it was discovered that some Southern California Edison (SCE) and SoCalGas utility lines are in conflict with the proposed storm drain system. The City is working with SCE and SoCalGas to resolve the conflicts by having the the utility purveyors relocate the utility lines in conflict. In order to understand the existing conflicts and the potential solutions, the City will need to pothole the utility lines believed to be in conflict and provide the data to the utility purveyors. SCE and SoCalGas will be responsible for providing the payment and labor for relocating the utility lines in conflict.
DISCUSSION:
The Thomsen Company, Inc. has previously provided the City with professional services consisting of topographical surveying and utility potholing for Line E-2 Storm Drain Improvements. Therefore, The Thomsen Company, Inc. already has much of the relevant data for Line E-2 Storm Drain Improvements and is familiar with the existing conditions and the end goal of the project.
Timeliness is an important factor for Line E-2 Storm Drain Improvements. Therefore, considering The Thomsen Company Inc.’s familiarity with the project, a sole source proposal from The Thomsen Company, Inc. is justified given the circumstances. However, as the cumulative total of the individual service agreements exceeds $100,000 the City’s procurement policy requires Council approval.
City staff recommends the City Council award the professional services agreement to The Thomsen Company, Inc. for the sum of $19,675.
FISCAL IMPACT:
RCFCD has agreed to reimburse the City only for the construction of Line E-2 Storm Drain Improvements. There will be no impact to the General Fund. Project #15-003 has $4,631,017 remaining from Fund 039 (Flood Control) and Fund 141 (DIF: Streets).
ATTACHMENTS:
Thomsen Agreement EWA 13.pdf
Attachments
Thomsen Agreement EWA 13.pdf
1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
San Jacinto MDP Line E-2 Storm Drain Improvement
1. Parties and Date. This Agreement is made and entered into this _________ day of ___________, 2026, by and between the City of San Jacinto, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 595 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 92583 (“City”) and he Thomsen Company, Inc., a California corporation, with its principal place of business at 2587 S. San Jacinto Ave, San Jacinto, CA 92583, ("Vendor"). City and Vendor are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
2. Terms and Conditions. The Parties shall comply with the Terms and Conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference.
3. Scope of Services; Schedule. Vendor shall be solely responsible for providing all materials, labor, tools, equipment, water, light, power, transportation, and superintendence of every nature and all other services and all facilities necessary to execute, complete, and deliver the services as particularly described in the Scope of Services (“Services”) attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference for the City’s San Jacinto MDP Line E-2 Storm Drain Improvement. The Services shall be completed timely and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit “B”.
4. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the Execution Date to December 31, 2027, unless earlier terminated as provided herein.
5. Compensation. Vendor shall receive compensation for Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation shall not exceed Nineteen Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Five Dollars ($19,675) (“Agreement Price”). Vendor’s invoices shall include a detailed description of the Services performed. Invoices shall be submitted to City on a monthly basis.
City shall review and pay all non-disputed and approved charges on such invoices in a timely manner. Vendor shall submit its final invoice to City within thirty (30) days from the last date of Services performed and failure to do so shall result in a waiver of payment from City.
6. Insurance. In accordance with Section 3 of the Terms and Conditions, Vendor shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement such insurance policies as checked below and provide proof of such insurance policies in a form satisfactory to City.
Commercial General Liability Insurance:
$1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage
Automobile Liability:
$1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.
Workers’ Compensation:
Statutory Limits / Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions):
Errors & Omissions liability insurance $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. 20th May
2 SIGNATURE PAGE TO SHORT FORM SERVICES AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AND
THE THOMSEN COMPANY, INC.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
APPROVED BY:
Robert A. Johnson
City Manager
ATTEST:
Julia Espinoza
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig Hayes
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
THE THOMSEN COMPANY, INC.
Signature
Name
Title
EXHIBIT “A”
EXHIBIT A
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SERVICES
1. Compliance with Law. Vendor shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations of the federal, state and local government. Vendor certifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law
respecting the employment of undocumented aliens,
including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time.
By its signature hereunder, Vendor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake selfinsurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before
commencing the performance of the Services. Vendor
represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment in violation of state or federal law. Vendor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq. (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the work is being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000, Vendor
agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws,
including, along with subcontractors, being registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (Labor Code §§
1725.1; 1771.1). It shall be mandatory upon the Vendor and all subcontractors to comply with all California Labor Code provisions, which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code §§ 1771; 1774; 1775), employment of
apprentices (Labor Code § 1777.5), certified payroll records (Labor Code §§ 1771.4; 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code §§ 1813; 1815) and debarment of contractors and
subcontractors (Labor Code § 1777.1). This Agreement may be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement.
2. Standard of Care. The Vendor shall perform the Services in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the
profession practicing under similar conditions.
3. Insurance. If required by Section 6 of this Agreement, the Vendor shall take out and maintain during this Agreement:
A. Commercial General Liability Insurance for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001); B. Automobile
Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage including coverage for owned, non-owned and hired
vehicles, at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 (ed. 10/13) covering automobile
liability, Code 1 (any auto); C. Workers’ Compensation; D.
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) coverage for a term acceptable to the City. Insurance carriers shall be licensed and authorized to do business in California. Such insurance carrier shall have not less than an "A:VII" rating according to the latest Best Key Rating unless otherwise approved by City. Vendor shall add City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds on Vendor’s Commercial General Liability and Automobile
Liability. Coverage provided by Vendor shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. All required insurance coverages, except for the professional liability coverage, shall contain or be endorsed to waiver of
subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Vendor or others providing insurance evidence in
compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Vendor hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its
subconsultants.
4. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Vendor shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing),
indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death (collectively, “Claims”), in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Vendor, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Vendor’s Services, the project, or this Agreement,
including without limitation the payment of all expert witness fees, attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses except such loss or damage which is caused by the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Vendor’s
obligation to indemnify shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Vendor or the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. If Vendor’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Vendor’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code § 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code § 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Vendor’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Vendor, and, upon Vendor obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Vendor’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Vendor’s proportionate percentage of fault.
5. Laws; Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of Riverside, State of California.
EXHIBIT “A”
6. Termination. The City may terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement for any or no reason by giving three (3) calendar days written notice to Vendor. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports and other documents produced or developed for the work. The City shall pay Vendor the reasonable value as determined by City of any portion of the Services completed prior to termination. The City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are
specified herein. Vendor shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed Services and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of the Services. Vendor may terminate its obligation to provide further work under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days written notice to City only in the event of City’s failure to perform in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Vendor.
7. Changes. By written notice, City may from time to time, make changes to the Services furnished to City by Vendor.
If such change causes an increase or decrease in the
Agreement Price or in the time required for performance, Vendor or City shall promptly notify the other party thereof and assert its claim for adjustment within fifteen (15) days after the change is ordered, and an equitable adjustment shall be made. However, nothing in this clause shall excuse the Vendor from proceeding immediately with the Agreement as changed.
8. Force Majeure. The respective duties and obligations of the Parties hereunder shall be suspended while and so long as performance hereto is prevented or impeded by a Force Majeure Event. The Vendor will not receive an adjustment to the contract price or any other compensation. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects a party’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters occurring at the project site; (2) terrorism or other acts of a public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the work); (4) pandemics, epidemics or
quarantine restrictions; and (5) strikes and other organized labor action occurring at the project site and the effects thereof on the work, only to the extent such strikes and other organized labor action are beyond the control of Vendor and its subcontractors, of every tier, and to the extent the effects thereof cannot be avoided by use of replacement workers.
For purposes of this section, “orders of governmental
authorities,” includes ordinances, emergency proclamations and orders, rules to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and other actions of the City in its capacity as a municipal authority. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may still terminate this Agreement in accordance with
Section 6.
9. Miscellaneous Terms. Vendor shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by the Parties. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation of the Parties. This is an integrated Agreement representing the entire
understanding of the Parties as to those matters contained herein, and supersedes and cancels any prior oral or written understanding or representations with respect to matters covered hereunder. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply,
according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. The captions of the various paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement. The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall not render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal. Notice may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the Parties to the addresses set forth in this Agreement. Vendor is retained as an
independent contractor and is not an employee of the City.
No employee or agent of Vendor shall become an employee of City. Vendor warrants that the individual who has signed this Agreement has the legal power, right and authority to make this Agreement and bind the Vendor hereto.
EXHIBIT B
SCOPE OF SERVICES; SCHEDULE OF SERVICES; CONSULTANT RATE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT “B”
https://d.docs.live.net/093b8c20e5408d3b/Thomsen Company/00 Admin Directory/EXTRA-WORK/2022-EXTRAS/2022-008.013-COSJ-ADDITIONAL POTHOLES-GAS AND SCE-STATE STREET.doc “Surveying Your World…”
E X T R A W O R K A U T H O R I Z A T I O N N O. 13
DATE: May 6, 2026 (REVISED 5-19-26) JOB NO.: 2022 - 008 CLIENT: CITY OF SAN JACINTO (SJ-372) PROJECT: STATE ST. LINE E-2 STORM DRAIN REQUESTED BY: MR. MOHANAD ALLAM, EIT ACCOUNT NO.: 2022 – 008.013 This Extra Work Authorization (EWA) amends our original Agreement for Professional Services dated May 8, 2022 and no additional work above or beyond said contract can be performed without an approved Extra Work Authorization.
All original Terms & Conditions of said Agreement shall remain in force as part of this EWA.
THE FOLLOWING EXTRA SERVICES HAVE BEEN REQUESTED FOR THE ADDITIONAL POT HOLES:
TASK 1- OFFICE CALCULATIONS: Conduct plan review and coordinate geometry calculations for pothole stake outs.
ESTIMATE (REDUCED) ....................................................................................... $ 250.00 TASK 2- STAKE-OUT NEW GAS & SCE CROSSINGS:
Due to additional gas and SoCal Edison line crossing locations being requested, TCI shall stakeout the four (4) new locations requested by SoCal Gas and two (2) locations requested by (SCE). They are as follows:
• Pothole #1= ¾-inch Gas service Noth of Station 14+50
• Pothole # 2= ½-inch Gas service South of Station 14+50 • Pothole #3= 8-inch Gas line at SD LAT 33 E/O State St. on Esplanade Ave.
• Pothole # 4=6-inch Gas line at SD LAT 33 @ 50’ +/- E/O State St. on Esplanade Ave.
• Pothole # 5= SCE line at SD LAT 33 @ 50’ +/- E/O State St. on Esplanade Ave.
• Pothole # 6= SCE line at SD LAT 34 @ 150’+/- E/O State St. on Esplanade Ave.
ESTIMATE .......................................................................................................$ 1,120.00 TASK 3- UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING: Our Consultant underground utility locators, ULTRA ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, INC., has budgeted for the six (6) potholes to cover the points identified by the City Engineering Department.
The general scope for air/vacuuming excavation includes:
2587 S. San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
(951) 925-3070 (951) 925-7469 FAX
www.thethomsencompany.com
EXHIBIT “B”
E X T R A W O R K A U T H O R I Z A T I O N N O. 13
♦ Dig Alert-Perform mark-outs & meetings and update Traffic Control Plans. (Assumes existing permit can be used for this move-in)
ESTIMATE ..................................................................................................... $ 3,280.00 ♦ Traffic Control- Provide basic traffic control per WATCH Guidelines (Includes signs, cones, and 1 arrow board. No flaggers, message boards, etc. are included.) ESTIMATE (for 1.5 days-REDUCED FROM 2 DAYS)...................................... $4,520.00 ♦ Potholing- Includes Trucks with two technicians, equipment, excavation, documentation, and travel for six (6) potholes.
ESTIMATE (for 1.5 days-REDUCED FROM 2 DAYS)..................................... $ 6,350.00 ♦ Pothole Repair- Place “Rapid Set” concrete @ hole area only, no full panels replacement/curb replacement (Includes mix, pour, and broom finish for texture.
Approx. 10 buckets of “AquaPhalt” for AC pavement holes. (No concrete repair is included) ESTIMATE ........................................................................................................ $1,200.00 TASK 4- SURVEY NEW POTHOLES: Per the City Project Engineer, our firm will use GPS survey equipment for this Task with an accepted standard vertical error of 0.10 of a foot. There are six (6) potholes for this Task.
ESTIMATE........................................................................................................ $ 1,120.00 TASK 5- COMPILE POTHOLE DATA: Download field survey data from the additional pothole survey and add the elevation data to the City CAD file drawing.
ESTIMATE........................................................................................................... $ 500.00 TASK 6- COORDINATION & MEETINGS: Attend virtual and telephone coordination meetings, as directed by City staff, to assist in on-going survey and design issues.
HOURLY (@ $175 Per hour for Principal – 2 hours are estimated-REDUCED FROM 4 HOURS) .......... $ 350.00 Ultra Engineering fuel sur-charge (2 rigs for 1.5 days).......................................$615.00 In-House Reimbursables (survey supplies, mileage, etc.) .............................................. $370.00 TOTAL ESTIMATE…......................................................................................... $ 19,675.00 CLIENT AUTHORIZATION:
IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 16, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, SECTION 463.5, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE
PRINCIPALS OF THIS FIRM ARE CURRENTLY LICENSED BY THE CALIFORNIA BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS AND GEOLOGISTS.
Prepared By (Signature Below) Approved By (Signature Below) Richard F. Thomsen, PLS NO. 6413 Mr. Stuart McKibbin, P.E., City Engineer May 19, 2026
Date Signed: Date Signed:
05/20/2026 EXHIBIT “B”
June 2, 2026
TO: City Council
REQUESTED
BY:
Stuart McKibbin
APPROVED
BY:
Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Tri-Party Cooperative Agreement Between Riverside County Transportation Commission, County of Riverside, and City of San Jacinto for Ramona Expressway Reconstruction Project Between Warren Road and Sanderson Avenue (CIP# 26-007)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions:
1. APPROVE as to form Cooperative Agreement No. 26-31-001-00;
2. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute the cooperative tri-party agreement between Riverside County Transportation Commission, County of Riverside, and the City of San Jacinto (Agreement No. 26-31-001-00) upon further review by City Attorney.
BACKGROUND:
The City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) have been planning the reconstruction of Ramona Expressway between Warren Road and Sanderson Avenue as the final phase of their Mid County Parkway construction projects. The reconstruction will consist of replacing asphalt and base to travel lanes that have not recently been rehabbed and provide a raised median while still allowing left hand turns into existing driveways. It is anticipated that there will be no right-of-way acquisition for this project. There is approximately 179,882 square feet of County right-of-way and approximately 597,655 square feet of City right-ofway within the project boundaries.
DISCUSSION:
RCTC, the County of Riverside, and the City of San Jacinto wish to enter into this Agreement No. 26-31-001-00 to establish roles and funding responsibilities of the Parties for the project. The County of Riverside will be the lead agency for the preparation of the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) and for the construction management of the project. The County of Riverside and the City of San Jacinto intend to enter into a subsequent service agreement to further define the roles and responsibilities of the agencies during construction. The future service agreement will be brought to City Council at a later date.
The engineer's estimate below is based on the current preliminary design plans. Final agency costs will be adjusted based on final design and actual expenditure. The County of Riverside would provide up to $2,000,000 of funding, RCTC would provide up to $8,000,000, the City of San Jacinto would provide up to $2,000,000.
PROJECT COST SHARE
Jurisdiction of Improvements Total Estimated Cost Maximum Agency Contribution County $2,000,000 County - $2,000,000
City $10,000,000
RCTC - $8,000,000
City - $2,000,000
Total $12,000,000
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Agreement No. 26-31-001-00 as to form and authorize City Manager to execute Agreement No. 26-31-001-00 upon further further review by City Attorney.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City of San Jacinto is expected to pay up to $2,000,000 towards the project. This $2,000,000 will be allocated through SB 1 RMRA (Gas Tax), so it is anticipated that signing Agreement No. 26-31-001-00 will have no impact to the City's general fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
MCP Tri Party Agreement 26-31-001-00
Attachments
MCP Tri Party Agmt 26-31-001-00.pdf
17336.01114\44097544.1
1 Agreement No. 26-31-001-00
TRI-PARTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CITY OF SAN JACINTO
FOR RAMONA EXPRESSWAY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
BETWEEN WARREN ROAD AND SANDERSON AVENUE
1. Parties and Date. This Agreement is made and entered into this ____ day of ______________, 2026, by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission (“RCTC”), the County of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency (“County”) and City of San Jacinto (“City”). RCTC, the County and the City are sometimes referred to herein individually as “Party”, and collectively as “Parties”.
2. Recitals.
2.1 RCTC and the County have entered into a Cooperative Agreement for the Mid County Parkway Project – Construction Contract 3 (“MCP 3”) (Agreement No. 22-31- 045-00) for the MCP3 improvements within County jurisdiction.
2.2 RCTC and the City intend to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for the Mid County Parkway Project – Construction Contract 3 (“MCP 3”) (Agreement No. 25-31-094- 00) for the MCP3 improvements within City jurisdiction prior to or concurrently with entering into this Agreement. As referred to as “Future Project” in said agreement.
2.3 The limits of the MCP 3 project are from approximately one mile east of Rider Street to Warren Road.
2.4 The City has requested additional pavement improvements and related raised median safety improvements outside of the MCP 3 project limits to the east as described in Exhibit A, along Ramona Expressway between Warren Road and Sanderson Avenue. The current cost estimate only accounts for the pavement improvements. The Median Improvements will be bid as a Bid Alternate and can be deleted from the scope if it exceeds the budget threshold. All together this is referred to as the Ramona Expressway Reconstruction Project, “Project”. The improvements are in both City and County jurisdictions. The improvements are referred to in this Tri-Party Cooperative Agreement as the “Project”.
2.5 RCTC, the County, and the City wish to enter into this Tri-Party Cooperative Agreement, to establish roles and funding responsibilities of the Parties for the Project.
2.6 RCTC and the City have requested that the County be the lead agency for preparation of the Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) and construction phases of 17336.01114\44097544.1
2 the Project. It is anticipated that there will not be any Right of Way acquisition for this project.
2.7 The County has agreed to act as the lead agency for the preparation of the PS&E and construction phases of the Project.
2.8 The County and the City intend to enter into a subsequent Service agreement to cover the terms, conditions, and responsibilities for the Project. The roles and responsibilities of the agencies will be further defined in a future anticipated service agreement by and between County of Riverside and City of San Jacinto.
3. Terms.
3.1 Improvements Requested by the City. The Project entails the design and construction of pavement improvements and raised concrete median along Ramona Expressway between Warren Road and Sanderson Avenue. The Project limits consist of portions in both County jurisdiction and City jurisdiction, as further depicted in Exhibit “A” attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein by reference. The pavement improvements will be 0.58' Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) over 2.10' of Class 2 Aggregate Base or equivalent as mutually approved by County and City. The pavement width will be from existing pavement to existing pavement limits. The Median Improvements will consist of demolition of asphalt pavement, openings for driveway access, and Type D-1 curb or equivalent as mutually approved by County and City. All of the improvements in Section
3.1 can be changed as mutually agreed by the parties.
3.2 Preparation of Design and Construction. The County shall be the lead agency for the preparation of the PS&E package and construction of the Project. The pavement improvements will be designed and constructed per County standards and specifications. This includes the work within the City jurisdiction.
3.3 Funding Obligations. The County has estimated the total cost of the Project to be approximately $12 million, with the work in County jurisdiction estimated at $2 million and the work in City jurisdiction estimated at $10 million. County will fund the work within County jurisdiction. RCTC will contribute 80% of the cost of the work within the City jurisdiction (approximately $8 million), with the City providing 20% of the cost of work within its jurisdiction (approximately $2 million). The funding to be provided by RCTC and City for the Project shall be adjusted based on actual costs incurred, subject to the limitations set forth below. The County will be responsible for any actual costs incurred for PS&E and construction within its jurisdiction. If Cooperative Agreement 22-31-045-00 or 25-31-094-00 is terminated due to City breach or termination, RCTC’s funding obligations related to the Project shall terminate or be put on hold, as mutually agreed by the parties. If the actual costs of the Project are anticipated to exceed the above estimated amounts, the County will promptly notify RCTC and the City. The Median Improvements will be bid as a Bid Alternate and can be deleted from the scope if it exceeds the budget threshold.
A. RCTC’s anticipated funding obligation to County is Eight Million Dollars ($8,000,000). County shall promptly notify RCTC if it is anticipated that RCTC’s 17336.01114\44097544.1
3 share of Project costs will exceed said funding amount. Any increase in RCTC’s anticipated funding obligation shall require written approval of RCTC’s Executive Director.
RCTC will not be responsible for any additional funding required in order to include the median improvements as part of the Project.
B. City’s anticipated funding obligation to County is Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). County shall promptly notify the City if it is anticipated that the City’s share of Project costs will exceed said funding amount. Any increase in the City’s anticipated funding obligation shall require written approval of the City Manager and City Council.
3.4 Payment; Invoices.
A. For Project work within the City jurisdiction to be funded by the County on a cost-reimbursement basis, County shall provide invoice statements to RCTC and the City, respectively, for Project expenses and supporting documentation incurred in accordance with this Cooperative Agreement, no less frequently than quarterly in any quarter in which reimbursable expenses are incurred, but not to exceed once per month.
Invoice statements submitted by the County shall be in a form and include such detail and supporting documentation is reasonably requested by RCTC and the City.
B. RCTC and the City shall, respectively, timely review and pay approved invoice statements submitted by County within thirty (30) days. RCTC and the City shall, respectively, promptly notify County of any disputed charges in writing giving reasons therefor. If any invoice submitted by County is disputed by RCTC or the City, respectively, only that portion so disputed may be withheld from payment.
3.5 The City shall maintain, operate, and repair its facilities in a manner which avoids or minimizes, to the extent possible and reasonable, any impact to the Project.
3.6 Following completion of the Project work within the City jurisdiction and prior to final acceptance thereof, the City shall timely review and provide approval of the work or identify any punch list work within fifteen (15) days from the written request for the final inspection. The City shall assume responsibility of the Project facilities completed within the City jurisdiction upon final acceptance of the work by County, and shall be solely responsible and liable for the operation, maintenance and use of, including all subsequent public use of such Project facilities, at its sole cost and expense.
3.7 The City will make its best efforts to perform all obligations of the City related to the Project in such a manner as to allow the Project to progress as scheduled.
3.8 Maintenance. Upon construction completion, the County and City will be responsible for maintaining the Project within their respective jurisdictions.
3.9 Cooperation. The County, the City and RCTC agree to cooperate in the development of the Project and the implementation of this Agreement.
3.10 Indemnification.
17336.01114\44097544.1
4 A. RCTC shall indemnify, defend and hold the County and the City, their councils, officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any negligent acts, omissions or breach of law, or willful misconduct of RCTC, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants or contractors in the performance of RCTC’s obligations under this Cooperative Agreement, including the payment of all reasonable attorneys’ fees.
B. The County shall indemnify, defend and hold RCTC and the City, their directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any negligent acts, omissions or breach of law, or willful misconduct of the County, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants or contractors in the performance of the County’s obligations under this Cooperative Agreement, including the payment of all reasonable attorneys’ fees.
C. The City shall indemnify, defend and hold RCTC and the County, their directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any negligent acts, omissions or breach of law, or willful misconduct of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants or contractors in the performance of the City’s obligations under this Cooperative Agreement, including the payment of all reasonable attorneys’ fees.
3.11 Delivery of Notices. All notices and invoices permitted or required under this Cooperative Agreement shall be given to the respective Parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective Parties may provide in writing for this purpose:
CITY:
City of San Jacinto
Engineering Division
1221 S. San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Attn: City Engineer
COMMISSION:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
Attn: Executive Director
17336.01114\44097544.1
5 COUNTY:
Riverside Transportation and
Land Management Agency
4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
Attn: Director of Transportation
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered, electronically delivered to the Directors above provided that receipt of such electronic delivery is confirmed to the sending Party by the receiving Party, or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the Party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.
3.12 Amendments. This Cooperative Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the Parties by an instrument in writing.
3.13 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. No consent or approval of either Party shall be deemed to waive or render unnecessary such Party’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act of the other Party.
Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Cooperative Agreement.
3.14 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Cooperative Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Funding Agreement, which shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder.
3.15 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Cooperative Agreement, shall survive any such expiration or termination.
3.16 Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Cooperative Agreement.
3.17 Termination. Any Party may terminate this Cooperative Agreement by giving thirty (30) days written notice thereof.
3.18 Entire Agreement. This Cooperative Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements or understandings.
3.19 Counterparts. This Cooperative Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.
17336.01114\44097544.1
6 3.20 Electronically Transmitted Signatures; Electronic Signatures. A manually signed copy of this Cooperative Agreement which is transmitted by facsimile, email or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Cooperative Agreement for all purposes. This Cooperative Agreement may be signed using an electronic signature.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Cooperative Agreement on the date first herein above written. 17336.01114\44097544.1
7 SIGNATURE PAGE
TO
TRI-PARTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
FOR PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS ON RAMONA EXPRESSWAY
BETWEEN WARREN ROAD AND SANDERSON AVENUE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Agreement on the Effective Date.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
By: _________________________
Aaron Hake, Executive Director
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
By: __________________________
Title: ________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: _________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation
Commission
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________
Title: ________________________
ATTEST:
By: __________________________
Title: ________________________
[Signatures continued on following page]
17336.01114\44097544.1
8 SIGNATURE PAGE
TO
TRI-PARTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
FOR PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS ON RAMONA EXPRESSWAY
BETWEEN WARREN ROAD AND SANDERSON AVENUE
[continued]
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By: __________________________
Title:_________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________
Title:_________________________
ATTEST:
By: __________________________
Title:_________________________
17336.01114\44097544.1
Exhibit A
EXHIBIT “A”
DEPICTION OF RAMONA EXPRESSWAY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
[ATTACHED BEHIND THIS PAGE]
June 2, 2026
TO: City Council
REQUESTED
BY:
Stuart McKibbin
APPROVED
BY:
Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Cooperative Agreement Between Riverside County Transportation Commission and the City of San Jacinto for Construction of Mid County Parkway Project - Construction Contract 3 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions:
1. APPROVE as to form Cooperative Agreement No. 25-31-094-00;
2. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute the cooperative agreement between Riverside County Transportation Commission and the City of San Jacinto (Agreement No. 25-31-094-00) upon further review by City Attorney.
BACKGROUND:
Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) has been widening and reconstructing segments of Ramona Expressway between Warren Road and Rider Street in a project titled Mid County Parkway Ramona Expressway Construction Contract 3 (MCP3). MCP3 is the third phase of a larger project that includes a 16-mile stretch of Ramona Expressway/Mid County Parkway from State Route 79 to Interstate 215 at Placentia Avenue in the City of Perris. MCP3 will improve approximately 8.6 miles of Ramona Expressway in eastern Riverside County, running through unincorporated county land and the city of San Jacinto.
On September 10, 2025, RCTC received and opened bids for the MCP3 project with the winning bid coming from Skanska USA Civil West California District Inc. (Skanska) with a bid of $107,382,285. Since then, Skanska has begun the construction of MCP3 and Engineering has been attending their weekly construction meetings.
DISCUSSION:
The majority of MCP3 is within the County of Riverside’s jurisdiction, but an approximate 1.7 mile segment lies within the City of San Jacinto jurisdiction. RCTC and the City of San Jacinto would like to enter into Cooperative Agreement No. 25-31-094-00. This agreement would establish the responsibilities between RCTC and the City to ensure a successful completion of the project. RCTC is the lead agency for the MCP3 project. RCTC will provide all the construction management and inspection services and provide the funds directly to Skanska. When construction is complete, the City of San Jacinto will own, operate, and maintain the improvements that lie within City of San Jacinto jurisdiction upon acceptance of the improved facilities.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Agreement No. 25-31-094-00 as to form and authorize City Manager to execute Agreement No. 25-31-094-00 upon further review by City Attorney.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approving and executing Agreement No. 25-31-094-00 will have no fiscal impact on the City’s general fund as RCTC will be funding the MCP3 entirely.
ATTACHMENTS:
MCP San Jacinto RCTC Cooperation Agreement 25-31-094-00.docx Attachments
MCP San Jacinto RCTC Cooperation Agmt 25-31-094-00.pdf
24438.00000\44056638.2
Agreement No. 25-31-094-00
1 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
AND
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MID COUNTY PARKWAY PROJECT - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 3
This Cooperative Agreement (“Cooperative Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of _________, 2026 (“Effective Date”) by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission (“RCTC”) and the City of San Jacinto (“City”). RCTC and the City are sometimes referred to herein individually as “Party”, and collectively as “Parties”.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, RCTC is undertaking the Mid County Parkway project (“MCP”).
WHEREAS, RCTC, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”), the California Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”), and the County of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency (“County”), as part of the MCP proposes to build a portion of the project in the City of San Jacinto and in unincorporated Riverside County, which is referred to in this Cooperative Agreement as the “Project”.
WHEREAS, the Project will include: improvements to the existing Ramona Expressway, two new mix flow lanes in the eastbound direction from approximately one mile east of Rider Street to Warren Road. The design will include one of the two ultimate MCP bridges over the San Jacinto River, which will accommodate the eastbound lanes.
Also included will be improvements to existing intersections, traffic signals, drainage facilities, and wildlife crossing and associated work. Roadway widening, drainage facilities, fencing, and utility relocation work will extend through City right of way, adjacent to County improvements. The Project is further described and depicted in Exhibit “A” attached to this Cooperative Agreement and incorporated herein by reference.
WHEREAS, the completed Project roadway and intersections will be at-grade and constructed according to County standards and specifications. This roadway will not be constructed into a six (6) lane State facility as initially intended in the original environmental document and will be constructed as a County facility. This has been documented in the environmental revalidation developed as part of this project.
WHEREAS, the Project is sometimes referred to by the Parties as the Mid County Parkway Project – Construction Contract 3.
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Parties to enter into this Cooperative Agreement to establish and coordinate the responsibilities of the Parties with respect to the Project, establish certain opportunities for cooperation and coordination and set forth various 24438.00000\44056638.2
2 responsibilities of the Parties all as further set forth herein.
WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that RCTC has or shall fully comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and all other applicable laws, as a precondition to construction of the Project.
WHEREAS, RCTC intends, pursuant to a public bidding process in accordance with State law, to select a construction contractor to complete the Project (“Contractor”).
WHEREAS, because the Project, if constructed, may impact City owned and/or maintained facilities, coordination between the Parties prior to and during construction of the Project is crucial to provide for mitigation of potential impacts that construction may have on the City, and to ensure that improvements within the City comply with applicable standards.
WHEREAS, the Project includes the following components:
• Right of Way Acquisition and Utility Relocation
• Construction
• Acceptance by the City for Operation and Maintenance of Improvements within City’s Jurisdiction
WHEREAS, at the request of the City, the Project will also provide funding to the County for certain City requested pavement improvements between Warren Road and Sanderson Avenue, as further described below and in Agreement No. 26-31-001-00.
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, it is mutually understood and agreed by RCTC and the City as follows:
TERMS
1. Definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth in the recitals above, the following terms shall have the meanings as set forth below.
1.1 As used in this Cooperative Agreement, the term “City’s Jurisdiction” shall mean and refer to the areas within the Project limits either owned and/or maintained by the City. As used herein, the term “City’s Jurisdiction” expressly excludes the State highway and County owned right of way.
1.2 As used in this Cooperative Agreement, the term “County Standards” shall mean and refer to the County’s standard plans, specifications, policies, guidelines, and ordinances, design criteria, construction details, and testing/inspection requirements, and amendments and supplements thereto, for work within the City’s Jurisdiction, approved by the County and in effect prior to approval of the design. 24438.00000\44056638.2
3 2. Term. This Cooperative Agreement shall be effective as of the date first set forth above, and shall continue in effect until the Project is accepted by the City as referenced in Section 5.15, unless otherwise terminated as specified in this Cooperative Agreement (“Term”).
3. Agreement to Cooperate. The Parties agree to mutually cooperate in order to help ensure that the Project is successfully completed with minimum impact to both Parties, and the public, and the City agrees to reasonably support the Project as appropriate, consistent with all applicable policies, procedures, and laws.
4. Additional Improvements Requested by City. The Project will provide funding to the County for construction of certain additional City requested pavement improvements (“Pavement Improvements”) and raised median safety improvements (“Median Improvements”) between Warren Road and Sanderson Avenue (“Future Project”). The Median Improvements will be bid as a bid alternate and can be deleted from the scope if these improvements exceed the budget threshold. The Pavement Improvements will be 0.58' Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) over 2.10' of Class 2 Aggregate Base or equivalent as mutually approved by County and City. The pavement width will be from existing pavement to existing pavement limits, as detailed in Exhibit “B” attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein by reference. The Median Improvements will consist of demolition of asphalt pavement, openings for driveway access, and Type D-1 curb or equivalent as mutually approved by County and City. The Future Project will be designed and constructed by the County, and will include a portion of work within the County jurisdiction. The County has estimated the cost of the Future Project to be approximately $12 million, with the work in County jurisdiction estimated at $2 million and the work in City jurisdiction estimated at $10 million. RCTC will contribute 80% of the cost of the work within the City jurisdiction (approximately $8 million), with the City to provide 20% of the funding (approximately $2 million) based on actual costs incurred. In no case shall RCTC’s contribution to the Future Project exceed $8 million. A separate triparty agreement will be entered into amongst the County, City and RCTC related to the Future Project. The County will implement the Future Project and administer program management, design, construction management and construction. The parties acknowledge that successful implementation of the Future Project will require coordination among the County, City, and RCTC, and express their mutual intent to work cooperatively and in good faith to finalize and execute such triparty agreement in a timely manner. The City may request periodic updates from the County and/or RCTC regarding the status of such agreement, and the parties agree to respond to such requests in a timely and reasonable manner.
5. Obligations of the City. If consistent with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations, the City agrees as follows:
5.1 The City may provide a City oversight engineer to oversee the work during construction within City right of way, at its own cost.
5.2 The City shall timely review design plans for the Project work to be completed within the City Jurisdiction, and provide any approvals or comments within 24438.00000\44056638.2
4 thirty (30) days of receipt of the plans. If the City fails to provide any comments or its approval within said time period, RCTC shall provide notice to the Planning Manager and City Engineer of the City that the design plans shall be deemed approved by the City if no comments are received within an additional 15 days. The City shall inspect the Project work completed within the City Jurisdiction upon written notice of completion of the work by RCTC to the City, and shall provide approval or identify any punch list work within fifteen (15) days.
5.3 The City shall not directly or indirectly encourage any third parties to object, oppose, delay, frustrate, or disrupt the full and complete design, analysis, consideration, potential approval, or implementation of the Project. . Such obligation shall extend both to RCTC’s processes regarding the Project, but also to any other federal, state, or local review or permitting processes.
5.4 The City shall not request any mitigation measures, conditions or exactions that are disproportionate to the Project impacts or that lack a nexus to the Project impacts, as reasonably determined by mutual agreement of City and RCTC.
5.5 The City shall not take any action with the intent or effect of unreasonably delaying or impacting the timely implementation of the Project by RCTC.
5.6 The City shall timely process the required encroachment permits to cover the Contractor’s work on the Project within the City right of way. Encroachment permits shall be processed in no more than five (5) working days after receipt of a complete encroachment permit application from Contractor. The City shall not issue any encroachment permits to any other contractors if the proposed work thereunder has the potential to delay or impact the Project, without first coordinating in good faith with the Contractor and RCTC to minimize such delay or impact. All required encroachment permits to be issued by City shall be issued in the name of RCTC.
5.7 The City shall permit ingress to and egress from the Project from City-maintained roads.
The City shall have appropriate representatives regularly attend meetings of the Contractor’s task forces formed for public information, traffic management and detours, local street construction, and related construction work impacting the City, and shall provide input at such meetings related to Project work that may impact City residents.
5.8 The City shall waive any and all charges and fees related to plan review and inspections for the Project.
5.9 The City shall waive any street trenching restrictions/moratoriums currently in place within the City limits with respect to the Project work, and shall waive, to the extent necessary to accommodate the Project Work, any other local requirements that prohibit or interfere with construction of the Project to the extent permitted by state or federal law.
24438.00000\44056638.2
5 5.10 The City shall timely, so as not to delay the Project, review, approve, and execute any necessary agreements or amendments to agreements with RCTC, County and/or the Contractor related to the Project work or any Project facilities within the City’s Jurisdiction.
5.11 The City shall relocate any City-owned utility that interferes with the Project.
5.12 The City shall not approve, without advance written notification to and consultation with RCTC, any land use plans, new projects or developments within its jurisdiction that are inconsistent with, may impact, or that interfere with the Project.
5.13 The City shall not allow any encroachment within the City’s right of way if such encroachment may interfere with the Project or the Project construction, without first coordinating the same with the Contractor and RCTC.
5.14 The City shall install, maintain, operate, and repair its facilities in a manner which avoids or minimizes, to the extent possible and reasonable, any impact to the Project.
5.15 City agrees to provide, at no cost to the Project, oversight of the Project within the City limits including construction inspection and to provide prompt reviews and approvals of submittals. Following completion of the Project work within the City’s Jurisdiction and prior to final acceptance thereof, the City shall timely review and provide approval of the work or identify any punch list work within fifteen (15) days from the written request for the final inspection. The City shall assume responsibility of the Project facilities completed within the City’s Jurisdiction upon final acceptance of the work by County, and shall be solely responsible and liable for the operation, maintenance and use of, including all subsequent public use of such Project facilities, at no cost or expense to RCTC.
5.16 The City will make its best efforts to perform all obligations of the City related to the Project in such a manner as to allow the Project to progress as scheduled.
6. Obligations of RCTC.
6.1 RCTC shall be responsible for providing all services to complete the Project, or as reasonably necessary for Project completion. RCTC shall be responsible for the process of selecting Project Contractor in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws. RCTC shall be responsible for obtaining all applicable environmental clearances and permits necessary to complete the Project, and for acquiring all right of way as further detailed in Article 7.
6.2 RCTC shall incorporate, with City’s review and concurrence, the County Standards for work within the City’s Jurisdiction into the design, and shall require that improvements within the City’s Jurisdiction be completed to such standards. 24438.00000\44056638.2
6 6.3 RCTC shall provide the City an opportunity to inspect the Project work during construction at City cost.
6.4 As between RCTC and the City, RCTC and its consultants shall be responsible for construction inspection of the Project work to ensure conformance with the construction contract. RCTC shall allow City staff to access the Project site, upon reasonable notice, to perform observation of any Project improvements. City inspectors shall communicate any construction deficiencies during construction, including a final punch list, to RCTC for completion. County has the final authority to accept the improvements.
6.5 RCTC shall assign any warranties for the Contractor’s work on the Project within the City’s Jurisdiction to the City upon City’s contract acceptance of the Project, and County’s final acceptance.
6.6 RCTC shall require its Contractor to obtain all required permits and approvals for all Project work including encroachment permits from City for construction of any Project work within the City’s Jurisdiction.
6.7 RCTC shall include, in its contract with the Contractor, a requirement that the Contractor include the City as an additional insured and as an indemnified party under said agreement.
6.8 As between RCTC and the City, RCTC shall be responsible for design, reviews, approvals, and inspection of the Project work within the City’s Jurisdiction to ensure conformance with the County Standards during completion of the Project design, selection of the Contractor, and during Project construction and maintenance periods.
6.9 Except in the case of an unforeseen circumstance, RCTC shall require its Contractor to provide at least a fifteen (15) day notification to City prior to any full or partial closure of any streets within City’s Jurisdiction exceeding one (1) day in duration. Short term closures less than one (1) day in duration shall require forty eight (48) hours prior notice.
6.10 RCTC will institute a public outreach campaign to keep emergency responders, School District transportation department, transit operators, the residents of the City and the general public apprised of the Project work, and any street closures and other impacts to use of the County and City right of way that may result from the Project.
In addition, RCTC shall develop and maintain a written Emergency Response plan that includes emergency contact information for RCTC’s Contractor, County of Riverside, City of San Jacinto, emergency responders and Contractor personnel that would be expected to respond to an emergency situation.
6.11 RCTC shall provide to City as-built plans for Project work within City’s Jurisdiction within 120 days of Notice of Completion.
7. RCTC Right of Way Obligations.
24438.00000\44056638.2
7 7.1 RCTC is responsible for all right of way work for the Project except as expressly set forth in this Cooperative Agreement.
7.2 RCTC will make all necessary arrangements with utility owners for the timely accommodation, protection, relocation, or removal of any existing utility facilities that conflict with construction of the Project or that violate City’s encroachment policy.
7.3 For utility relocations within the City’s Jurisdiction, RCTC will provide City a copy of conflict maps, relocation plans, proposed notices to owner, reports of investigation, and utility agreements (if applicable) for City’s concurrence prior to issuing the notices to owner and executing the utility agreement. All utility conflicts will be fully addressed prior to Right-of-Way Certification and all arrangements for the protection, relocation, or removal of all conflicting facilities will be completed prior to construction contract award and included in the Project plans, specifications, and estimate.
7.4 RCTC will provide a land surveyor licensed in the State of California to be responsible for surveying and right-of-way engineering. All survey and right-of-way engineering documents will bear the professional seal, certificate number, registration classification, expiration date of certificate, and signature of the responsible surveyor.
7.5 RCTC will utilize a properly licensed consultant for all right-of-way activities. For properties within City Jurisdiction, RCTC shall provide the City with copies of appraisal reports and acquisition documents upon request. RCTC will submit a draft Right-of-Way Certification to City prior to the schedule Right-of-Way Certification milestone date for review. RCTC will submit a final Right-of-Way Certification to the City for approval prior to the advertising the construction contract. Physical and legal possession of the right-of-way must be completed prior to advertising the construction contract, unless Parties mutually agree to other arrangements in writing.
7.6 RCTC shall be the lead agency on eminent domain activities, if required for the Project.
7.7 Title to any property to be transferred to City by RCTC shall be free of all encumbrances and liens, except as to those items which City agrees are not in conflict with use of the property for roadway purposes. Upon acceptance, RCTC will provide City with a policy of title insurance in City’s name.
8. Dispute Resolution: Legal Disputes. Unless otherwise specified herein, the Parties shall comply with the following procedure in the case of a dispute, claim or controversy arising under or in relation to this Cooperative Agreement.
8.1 Submission to RCTC Executive Director and Transportation Director.
The dispute shall be referred for negotiation to the RCTC Executive Director and the City of San Jacinto City Manager (“City Manager”). The RCTC Executive Director and the City Manager agree to undertake good faith attempts to resolve said dispute, claim or controversy within ten (10) calendar days after the receipt of written notice from the Party alleging that a dispute, claim or controversy exists. The Parties additionally agree to 24438.00000\44056638.2
8 cooperate with the other Party in scheduling negotiation sessions. However, if said matter is not resolved within thirty (30) calendar days after the first negotiating session, either Party may then request that the matter be submitted to further dispute resolution procedures, as may be agreed upon by the Parties.
8.2 If a matter is not resolved within thirty (30) calendar days after the first negotiating session between the Executive Director and the City Manager, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing by the Parties, either Party may proceed with any other remedy available in law or in equity, including specific performance as set forth in Section
8.1. 8.3 To the extent legally permissible, the Parties agree not to take any action related to the dispute that would negatively impact the Project until the dispute resolution process is completed.
9. Specific Performance.
9.1 The Parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the provisions of this Cooperative Agreement were not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. Accordingly, each of the Parties, in addition to any other available remedy in law or in equity, shall be entitled to specific performance of the terms hereof, including the issuance of an injunction or injunctions as a remedy for any such breach, to prevent breaches of this Cooperative Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Cooperative Agreement, this being in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. Each of the Parties further hereby waives (a) any defense in any action for specific performance that a remedy at law would be adequate and (b) any requirement under any law to post security as a prerequisite to obtaining equitable relief.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Cooperative Agreement, should RCTC obtain City’s specific performance, City shall not have to reimburse RCTC pursuant to Section 17 of this Cooperative Agreement. Should City have to reimburse RCTC pursuant to Section 17 of this Cooperative Agreement, RCTC shall not be entitled to City’s specific performance.
9.2 Prior to either Party instituting an action for specific performance, the Parties shall comply with the dispute resolution process set forth above in Section 8.1, and consistent with Section 8.3, to the extent legally permissible, the Parties agree not to take any action related to the dispute that would negatively impact the Project until the dispute resolution process is complete.
10. Indemnification.
10.1 RCTC shall indemnify, defend and hold the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, 24438.00000\44056638.2
9 in any manner arising out of or incident to any negligent acts, omissions or breach of law, or willful misconduct of RCTC, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants or contractors in the performance of RCTC’s obligations under this Cooperative Agreement, including the payment of all reasonable attorneys’ fees.
10.2 The City shall indemnify, defend and hold RCTC, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any negligent acts, omissions or breach of law, or willful misconduct of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants or contractors in the performance of the City’s obligations under this Cooperative Agreement, including the payment of all reasonable attorneys’ fees.
10.3 The indemnification provisions set forth in this Section 10 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Cooperative Agreement.
11. Disclaimer. In no event shall either Party be responsible or liable for the quality, suitability, operability or condition of any design or construction by the Project consultants or the Contractor, as applicable, and RCTC expressly disclaims any and all express or implied representations or warranties with respect thereto, including any warranties of suitability or fitness for use; provided, however, that nothing in this provision shall relieve RCTC of its obligations or liability arising from its failure to exercise reasonable oversight or supervision of the Project consultants or Contractor.
12. Force Majeure. The failure of performance by either Party (except for payment obligations) hereunder shall not be deemed to be a default where delays or defaults are due to war; insurrection; strikes; lock-outs; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes; lack of transportation; governmental restrictions; unusually severe weather; inability to secure necessary labor, materials or tools; delays of any contractor, subcontractor, railroad, or suppliers; acts of the other Party; acts or failure to act of any other public or governmental agency or entity (other than that acts or failure to act of the Parties); or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the Party claiming an extension of time to perform or relief from default. An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the Party claiming such extension is sent to the other Party within thirty (30) days of the commencement of the cause. Times of performance under this Cooperative Agreement may also be extended in writing by mutual agreement between the Parties.
13. Amendments. This Cooperative Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the Parties by an instrument in writing.
14. Assignment of Cooperative Agreement. Neither Party may assign or transfer its respective rights or obligations under this Cooperative Agreement without the express written consent of the other Party. Any purported assignment or transfer by one 24438.00000\44056638.2
10 Party without the express written consent of the other Party shall be null and void and of no force or effect.
15. Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. No consent or approval of either Party shall be deemed to waive or render unnecessary such Party’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act of the other Party.
Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Cooperative Agreement.
16. Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Cooperative Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Cooperative Agreement, which shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder.
17. Termination: Repayment Obligation.
17.1 Both RCTC and City shall have the right, with or without cause, to terminate this Cooperative Agreement, by giving thirty (30) calendar days written notice to the other Party, specifying the date of termination, provided that in the case of a termination for cause, prior notice and opportunity to cure, as specified below, shall first be provided to the Party in breach by the non-breaching Party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, following commencement of construction of the Project, the City may only terminate this Cooperative Agreement for cause, after providing RCTC notice of a material breach, and reasonable opportunity to cure, as specified below.
17.2 City Termination for Convenience. If the City terminates this Cooperative Agreement without cause, the City shall reimburse RCTC for its Project costs within the City limits only, including any Project termination costs, expended following the Effective Date of this Cooperative Agreement through the effective date of termination.
In such case, the Parties shall enter into good faith negotiations to establish a reasonable repayment schedule and repayment mechanism. Upon repayment by City to RCTC in accordance with this section all Project documents (including but not limited to designs, studies, or plans). Project improvements, Project warranties, title to property for the Project, and any other deliverables or work paid by RCTC for the Project prior to the date of termination and re-paid by City shall become the sole property of City. The foregoing shall be provided subject to Section 11 of this Agreement. Except as set forth in Section
7.7, any property for the Project conveyed pursuant to this section shall be provided by RCTC “as is” and without warranty.
17.3 RCTC Termination for Convenience. If RCTC terminates this Cooperative Agreement without cause, RCTC shall transfer to City all Project documents (including but not limited to designs, studies, or plans), Project improvements, Project 24438.00000\44056638.2
11 warranties, title to property for the Project, and any other deliverables of work produced under this Agreement, to the extent procured or produced with funds provided by the City.
The foregoing shall be provided by RCTC subject to Section 11 of this Agreement. Except as set forth in Section 7.7, any property for the Project conveyed pursuant to this section shall be provided by RCTC “as is” and without warranty. In the case of a RCTC’s termination for convenience, the City shall have no re-payment obligation whatsoever.
17.4 City Termination for Cause. If RCTC materially breaches this Cooperative Agreement in a manner that impedes the ability of the Project to proceed as planned, the City may terminate this Cooperative Agreement for cause, after providing RCTC notice of such material breach and a reasonable opportunity to cure of at least sixty (60) days, subject to extension as set forth in Section 17.6 below. In the case of a termination for cause, RCTC shall transfer to City all Project documents (including but not limited to designs, studies, or plans), Project Improvements, Project warranties, title to property for the Project, and any other deliverables or work produced under this Agreement, to the extent procured or produced with funds provided by City. The foregoing shall be provided by RCTC subject to Section 11 of this Agreement. Except as set forth in Section 7.7. any property for the Project conveyed pursuant to this section shall be provide by RCTC “as is” and without warranty. The City shall notify RCTC of such material breach within thirty (30) days of the date that the City became aware of or reasonably should have become aware of the breach. In the case of termination for cause, the City shall have no re-payment obligation whatsoever. Prior to the City’s termination for cause pursuant to this section, the Parties shall be required to undertake the dispute resolution process described in Section 8 above.
17.5 RCTC Termination for Cause – Breach. If the City refuses to issue permits for construction of the Project, takes any action in violation of the terms of this Cooperative Agreement that impedes the ability of the Project to proceed as planned, or fails to undertake its obligations under this Agreement, unless the City terminates for convenience as set forth above, RCTC may terminate this Cooperative Agreement for cause, after providing the City notice of such material breach and a reasonable opportunity to cure of at least sixty (60) days, subject to extension as set forth in Section
17.6 below, and the City shall reimburse RCTC for the Project costs expended within the City limits only following the Effective Date of this Cooperative Agreement through the effective date of termination. Such costs shall include the costs incurred by RCTC and paid to the County pursuant to Agreement No. 26-31-001-00, as referenced above, for the additional improvements requested by the City. In such case, the Parties shall enter into good faith negotiations to establish a reasonable repayment schedule and repayment mechanism. Prior to RCTC’s termination for cause pursuant to this section, the Parties shall be required to undertake the dispute resolution process described in Section 8 above and RCTC shall be required to provide City with a cost estimate for the Project costs expended following the Effective Date of this Cooperative Agreement through the proposed effective date of termination. Upon repayment by City to RCTC in accordance 24438.00000\44056638.2
12 with this section, all Project documents (including but not limited to designs, studies, or plans), Project improvements, Project warranties, title to property for the Project, and any other deliverables or work paid by RCTC for the Project prior to the date of termination and repaid by City shall become the sole property of City. The foregoing shall be provided by RCTC subject to Section 11 of this Agreement. Except as set forth in Section 7.7, any property for the Project conveyed pursuant to this section shall be provided by RCTC “as is" and without warranty.
17.6 Cure Period Extensions. If the material breach identified by the nonbreaching Party is not reasonably capable of cure within a sixty (60) day period following the non-breaching Party’s delivery of its notice of breach, then:
• The breaching Party shall, within thirty (30) days following receipt of the notice of breach, provide a written response to the non-breaching Party that (i) identifies the actions to be undertaken to cure the material breach (the “Cure Activities”) and (ii) identifies a schedule of performance for implementation and completion of the Cure Activities (the “Schedule”); • The non-breaching Party shall review the proposed Cure Activities and Schedule for purposes of confirming the reasonableness thereof; • At the request of the non-breaching Party, representatives of the Parties shall meet and confer for purposes of addressing any questions or concerns with respect to the Cure Activities and the Schedule;
• Upon confirming the reasonableness of the Cure Activities and Schedule (as may be adjusted to address concerns), the non-breaching Party shall grant an extension of the sixty (60) day cure period to correspond with the Schedule; and
• Provided that the breaching Party is diligently pursuing implementation of the Cure Activities in accordance with the Schedule, the breaching Party may request reasonable extensions of the Schedule, and the non-breaching Party shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to such requests.
The Parties shall continue to perform under this Cooperative Agreement during the cure period. Any dispute regarding Cure Activities or Schedule shall be subject to the dispute resolution process described in Section 8 above.
17.7 The repayment obligation set forth in this Section 17 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Cooperative Agreement.
17.8 If this Cooperative Agreement is terminated, RCTC shall, at RCTC’s expense, return the Project right-of-way within the City Jurisdiction to its original condition or to an acceptable safe and operable condition, as mutually agreed upon by the Parties. 24438.00000\44056638.2
13 18. Predetermination. Nothing in this Cooperative Agreement is intended by the Parties nor should be interpreted as predetermining any decisions or approvals by either Party’s boards or commissions.
19. Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Cooperative Agreement, shall survive any such expiration or termination.
20. Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Cooperative Agreement.
21. Relationship of the Parties. RCTC is, for purposes relating to this Cooperative Agreement, an independent contractor of City and shall not be deemed an employee of City. It is expressly understood and agreed that RCTC (including its employees, agents, and subcontractors) shall in no event be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled, including, but not limited to overtime, any retirement benefits, worker’s compensation benefits, and injury leave or other leave benefits. There shall be no employer-employee relationship between the Parties and RCTC shall hold City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Cooperative Agreement.
22. Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Cooperative Agreement shall be given to the respective Parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective Parties may provide in writing for this purpose:
CITY:
City of San Jacinto
Engineering Division
1221 S. San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Attn: Director of Transportation
COMMISSION:
Riverside County Transportation
Commission
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
Attn: Executive Director
24438.00000\44056638.2
Agreement No. 25-31-094-00
14 Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered, electronically delivered to the Directors above provided that receipt of such electronic delivery is confirmed to the sending Party by the receiving Party, or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the Party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.
23. Counterparts. This Cooperative Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.
24. Electronically Transmitted Signatures; Electronic Signatures. A manually signed copy of this Cooperative Agreement which is transmitted by facsimile, email or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Cooperative Agreement for all purposes. This Cooperative Agreement may be signed using an electronic signature.
25. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Cooperative Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
26. Entire Agreement. This Cooperative Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements or understanding.
24438.00000\44056638.2
15 SIGNATURE PAGE
TO
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 25-31-094-00
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Cooperative Agreement on the date first herein above written.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
By:
Aaron Hake, Executive Director
Approved as to Form:
By: _________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
General Counsel
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
Approved by the
City Council
By:
Robert A. Jonson
City Manager
Recommended for approval:
By:
Craig Hayes, City Attorney
Best Best & Krieger LLP
ATTEST:
By:
Julia Espinoza
City Clerk (SEAL)
24438.00000\44056638.2
Agreement No. 25-31-094-00
Exhibit A
EXHIBIT “A”
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Mid County Parkway – Construction Contract 3 Project will construct two new mix flow lanes in the eastbound direction from approximately one mile east of Rider Street to Warren Road. The design will include one of the two ultimate MCP bridges over the San Jacinto River, which will accommodate the eastbound lanes. Also included will be improvements to existing intersections, traffic signals, drainage facilities, and wildlife crossing and associated work. This work takes places in both the County and City jurisdictions. Work within the City of San Jacinto includes roadway widening, drainage facilities, fencing, and utility relocation work.
24438.00000\44056638.2
Agreement No. 25-31-094-00
Exhibit B
EXHIBIT “B”
MCP 3 IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN SAN JACINTO
[ATTACHED BEHIND THIS PAGE]
June 2, 2026
TO: City Council
REQUESTED
BY:
Travis Randel, Deputy City Manager
APPROVED
BY:
Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Professional Services Agreement for a Comprehensive Update to the City’s Landscape, Irrigation, Park, Basin, Parkway and Street Tree Design Standards
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. APPROPRIATE an additional $100,000 for the preparation of updated Citywide Landscape, Irrigation, Park, Basin, Parkway and Street Tree Design Standards;
2. AUTHORIZE the transfer of the previously budgeted $80,000 for Landscape Design Guideline updates in the Planning Division FY 2025/2026 budget, together with the additional appropriation, into CIP Project No. 26- 013;
3. AWARD a Professional Services Agreement to Community Works Design Group in the amount of $159,615 for professional consulting services associated with the preparation of the updated standards subject to review of the City Attorney;
4. REJECT all other proposals; and
5. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement and all related contract documents.
DISCUSSION:
The City of San Jacinto is seeking to comprehensively update and consolidate its citywide landscape, irrigation, park, basin, parkway, and street tree design standards into a single coordinated and modernized standards manual. The City’s current standards consist of a combination of older landscape guidelines, standard details, and project-specific requirements that have evolved over time and are dispersed across multiple documents. Many of these materials are outdated, incomplete, difficult to navigate, or inconsistent with current operational practices and regulatory requirements.
The proposed project will establish a unified set of standards governing landscaping, irrigation systems, parks, stormwater basins, parkways, trails, and related public improvements throughout the City. The resulting standards manual is intended to provide clear, practical, and enforceable guidance for City staff, developers, engineers, landscape architects, and contractors involved in the design, construction, rehabilitation, and long-term maintenance of public and private improvements associated with development projects.
The project is also intended to support implementation of several adopted City policies and planning documents, including General Plan 2040, the San Jacinto Trails Master Plan, parkland dedication requirements, and the City’s adopted water efficiency requirements. In addition, the updated standards will assist the City in complying with evolving State requirements related to water conservation, including the California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO).
A primary operational objective of this project is to standardize materials, equipment, construction details, and approved design practices citywide. Standardization will improve long-term maintenance efficiency by reducing the variety of irrigation components, controllers, pumps, plant palettes, park amenities, and related infrastructure currently maintained by City staff. The updated standards will also improve compatibility between facilities, reduce lifecycle maintenance costs, streamline inventory management, and simplify future repair and replacement projects.
The standards will additionally improve the development review process by providing applicants with clear and predictable expectations early in project design. By consolidating requirements into a single user-friendly document with clearly illustrated standards, diagrams, technical details, and approved material specifications, the City anticipates reducing ambiguity during plan review and minimizing repetitive correction cycles.
To ensure a competitive and transparent consultant selection process, the City issued Request for Proposals No.
SJ-PU-26-002 soliciting qualified professional consulting firms with experience in municipal landscape architecture, irrigation system design, park planning, and development standards preparation.
The City received two (2) complete and responsive proposals prior to the submission deadline. A third proposal was received but was determined to be non-responsive during the initial screening process due to missing required information.
An evaluation committee composed of City staff reviewed and scored each proposal based on the criteria identified in the Request for Proposals, including:
Technical expertise and relevant municipal experience;
Qualifications of the project team;
Project understanding and technical approach;
Ability to deliver a comprehensive and user-friendly standards document; and Overall value and cost effectiveness.
The proposal results are summarized below:
Consultant Proposal Amount Score
Community Works Design
Group $159,615.00 83
Van Dyke Landscape
Architects $120,010.00 76
Following review and evaluation of the proposals, staff recommends awarding the contract to Community Works Design Group.
Community Works Design Group demonstrated superior subject matter expertise and provided the strongest overall proposal in terms of project understanding, technical approach, municipal experience, and long-term operational value to the City. The firm demonstrated a detailed understanding of the City’s goals and operational needs and presented a comprehensive methodology for developing an accessible, searchable, and highly implementable standards manual.
In addition, Community Works Design Group possesses significant prior experience working with the City of San Jacinto, including preparation of the City’s original Landscape Design Guidelines and Parkway & Median Master Plan. Their proposal also emphasized long-term maintenance efficiency, water conservation, standardized equipment specifications, and development of practical implementation tools intended to streamline both plan review and field maintenance operations.
The proposed scope of work includes a comprehensive audit of the City’s existing standards and municipal code requirements; development of updated park, landscape, irrigation, basin, and street tree standards; preparation of standard construction details and GIS-compatible plant palettes; development of residential prototype landscape plans; preparation of park amenity scoring systems; and assistance with public adoption and implementation of the final standards manual.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The FY 2025/2026 budget previously included $80,000 within the Planning Division budget, Account 011-1700- 417.30-90, for preparation of updated Landscape Design Guidelines primarily focused on development-related landscape requirements. However, during development of the Request for Proposals and evaluation of the City’s existing standards framework, staff identified that several additional and related standards documents are also outdated, fragmented, incomplete, or in need of consolidation and modernization. These additional areas include park development standards, irrigation standards, street tree standards, basin and stormwater facility standards, parkway standards, and related public infrastructure requirements.
Rather than addressing these documents independently over multiple future projects, staff determined that a comprehensive citywide standards update would provide the most efficient and cost-effective long-term approach.
Consolidating these standards into a single coordinated manual will provide clear and consistent direction for both future development and ongoing City maintenance operations while improving internal coordination between departments responsible for planning, engineering, parks, landscape maintenance, stormwater, and public infrastructure.
Because the resulting standards will directly govern and improve the design, construction, operation, rehabilitation, and long-term maintenance of landscape improvements, irrigation systems, parks, parkways, stormwater facilities, basins, and related infrastructure maintained within the City’s various landscape and maintenance assessment districts, staff anticipates proportionally allocating a portion of the additional project costs among the applicable Special Districts (LLPD-1, LLPD-2, and CFDs). These districts directly benefit from the preparation of updated and standardized maintenance and construction criteria intended to improve long-term operational efficiency, reduce maintenance costs, standardize equipment and materials, improve water efficiency, and extend the useful life of district-maintained infrastructure and facilities.
Staff is requesting an additional appropriation of $100,000, for a total project budget of $180,000 to be allocated to CIP Project No. 26-013, Account 199-9999-425.40-01.
The recommended contract amount with Community Works Design Group is $159,615. The remaining project budget will provide contingency for unforeseen additional services, document revisions, supplemental technical analysis, printing, and implementation support associated with the project.
The updated standards are also expected to reduce future maintenance expenditures associated with incompatible or inconsistent infrastructure installations and improve the City’s ability to competitively bid maintenance and rehabilitation work through standardized specifications and approved materials lists.
Attachments
Request for Proposals
RHA Community Works Proposal
RHA Community Works Fee Estimate
Draft Professional Services Agreement
RE Q U E S T FO R PR O P O S A L S
Comprehensive Update to the City's
Landscape, Irrigation, Park, Basin, Parkway
and Street Tree Design Standards
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 1 NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS, RFP NO. SJ-PW-26-002
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of San Jacinto (“City”) is requesting proposals from qualified consultants to provide professional services as described in Request for Proposals No.
SJ-PU-26-002.
Proposals shall be submitted electronically through the City of San Jacinto PlanetBids Portal:
https://www.sanjacintoca.gov/government/bidsProposals
Copies of the Request for Proposals may be obtained through the City’s PlanetBids portal. Vendors must register with PlanetBids in order to download solicitation documents and submit proposals.
The official schedule for this solicitation, including the proposal due date, question deadline, and any pre-proposal meeting information, will be posted on the PlanetBids portal. Proposers are responsible for monitoring PlanetBids for updates, addenda, and schedule information related to this RFP.
All proposals must be submitted electronically through the PlanetBids portal. Emailed, mailed, or hand-delivered submissions will not be accepted. Proposers are responsible for ensuring that their proposal is submitted prior to the deadline identified on PlanetBids. The City does not provide technical assistance for PlanetBids. You may contact PlanetBids technical support at (818) 992- 1771 should you have issues accessing or submitting bids.
All requests for clarification regarding this RFP must be submitted through the PlanetBids Question and Answer (Q&A) section. Responses will be posted through PlanetBids and will be available to all registered vendors.
If a proposer intends to request exceptions to the requirements of the RFP or to the terms of the draft Professional Services Agreement, those exceptions must be clearly identified in the proposer’s submission.
The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive minor irregularities or informalities if it is determined to be in the best interest of the City.
For general questions regarding this solicitation, contact:
Simon Olivares
City of San Jacinto
[email protected]
(951) 537-6351
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................4
2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES ..........................................................................................................................6
3. EXISTING PLANS AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS............................................................................9 CITY OF SAN JACINTO GENERAL PLAN...........................................................................................................9 SAN JACINTO TRAILS MASTER PLAN ..............................................................................................................9 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES...................................................................................................................9 LANDSCAPE STANDARD DETAILS.................................................................................................................10 2017 DRAFT LANDSCAPE GUIDELINE UPDATE...............................................................................................10 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS.....................................................10
4. SCOPE OF WORK..................................................................................................................................11 TASK 1 – PROJECT INITIATION AND COORDINATION ......................................................................................11 TASK 2 – REVIEW OF EXISTING DOCUMENTS AND BEST PRACTICES................................................................11 TASK 3 – PARK CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK AND PARK DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ....................................12 TASK 4 – PARK AMENITY DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT STANDARDS ....................................................................13 TASK 5 – LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION DESIGN STANDARDS .........................................................................13 TASK 6 – STREET TREE AND PARKWAY STANDARDS .....................................................................................13 TASK 7 – TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS ................................................................14 TASK 8 – PROTOTYPICAL RESIDENTIAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE DESIGNS.....................................................14 TASK 9 – BASIN AND STORMWATER FACILITY DESIGN STANDARDS................................................................14 TASK 10 – PREPARATION OF DRAFT AND FINAL STANDARDS MANUAL...........................................................15 TASK 11 – MEETINGS AND PROJECT COORDINATION .....................................................................................15 TASK 12 – IMPLEMENTATION AND ADOPTION SUPPORT .................................................................................15
5. DELIVERABLES ....................................................................................................................................17
1. PROJECT WORK PLAN AND SCHEDULE......................................................................................................17
2. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND BEST PRACTICES SUMMARY............................................................................17
3. ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT STANDARDS MANUAL ........................................................................................18
4. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT STANDARDS MANUAL ..........................................................................................18
5. FINAL STANDARDS MANUAL ...................................................................................................................18
6. STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS........................................................................................................19
7. PROTOTYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE PLANS ......................................................................................19
8. PARK PLANNING TOOLKIT .......................................................................................................................20
9. PROJECT MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS ................................................................................................20
10. FINAL PROJECT FILES ............................................................................................................................20
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE...........................................................................................................................21 City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 3
7. CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS.......................................................................................................22
8. PROPOSAL FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS .............................................................23 GENERAL FORMAT REQUIREMENTS..............................................................................................................23 PROPOSAL CONTENT ..................................................................................................................................23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (2 PAGES MAXIMUM)............................................................................................23 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE (15 PAGES MAXIMUM) ...............................................24 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING (10 PAGES MAXIMUM)...............................................................................24 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH (20 PAGES MAXIMUM)...........................................24 PROJECT SCHEDULE AND WORK PLAN (5 PAGES MAXIMUM) .....................................................................25 FEE PROPOSAL (SUBMITTED AS A SEPARATE DOCUMENT).........................................................................25 EXCEPTIONS TO THE RFP OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ..........................................................26 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (OPTIONAL)...................................................................................................26
9. PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA.................................................................................................27 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE .....................................................................................27 PROJECT TEAM AND KEY PERSONNEL ..........................................................................................................28 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH ................................................................................28 PROJECT SCHEDULE AND WORK PLAN..........................................................................................................28 FEE PROPOSAL...........................................................................................................................................28
10. CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS ..............................................................................................29
11. GENERAL CONDITIONS AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS............................................................30 PROTEST PROCEDURE .................................................................................................................................31
12. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT .......................................................................................32
13. BACKGROUND AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ............................................................................33
14. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION....................................................................................................................34 City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 4
1. INTRODUCTION
The City of San Jacinto, one of the oldest communities in Riverside County, is a city rich in history, culture, and continued growth. Founded in 1870 and incorporated in 1888, San Jacinto has long served as a center for agriculture, ranching, and industry in the San Jacinto Valley. Located at the base of the San Jacinto Mountains, the City maintains a unique blend of small-town character while accommodating modern residential, commercial, and industrial development. Over the past two decades, San Jacinto has experienced substantial growth and continues to position itself as an important community within the Inland Empire.
As development continues, the City seeks to ensure that new neighborhoods, parks, streetscapes, and landscaped areas are designed in a consistent, sustainable, and maintainable manner. To support these goals, the City is seeking the services of a qualified consultant to assist in the preparation of comprehensive Citywide Landscape, Irrigation, Park, Basin, Parkway and Street Tree Design Standards.
This effort will build upon the City's long-range planning framework established through the adoption of Envision San Jacinto, General Plan 2040, adopted in 2022. The General Plan emphasizes sustainable development, high-quality public spaces, water conservation, and the creation of cohesive and attractive neighborhoods. Updated landscape and park design standards will serve as an important implementation tool to support these policies and guide future development throughout the community.
The purpose of this project is to develop clear, practical, and enforceable standards that will guide the design and construction of landscaping, parks, parkways, streetscapes, basins, and irrigation systems throughout the City of San Jacinto. These standards will establish consistent expectations for the design of both public and private improvements associated with development projects and City facilities. The standards will also support compliance with applicable state requirements, including the California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), while promoting water conservation, long-term durability, and efficient maintenance practices.
The resulting standards manual is expected to include both narrative requirements and implementable technical exhibits, such as standard construction details, typical sections, approved equipment and material specifications, diagrams, and other technical guidance suitable for use during project design and plan review.
The resulting standards are intended to provide clear direction to developers, engineers, landscape architects, and City staff by establishing consistent expectations for landscaping, park development, irrigation systems, street trees, and related amenities. The standards will help streamline project review, improve long-term maintenance outcomes, and ensure that new development contributes positively to the City’s built and natural environment.
In addition to guiding the design and construction of new facilities, the preparation of standardized design criteria will also improve the City’s ability to maintain, repair, and rehabilitate landscaping, irrigation systems, basins, pumps, and related infrastructure over time. By establishing approved City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 5 materials, equipment specifications, and design details, the standards will allow the City to maintain consistency across facilities and streamline maintenance and replacement activities.
When components such as irrigation equipment, pumps, controllers, or landscape elements require repair or replacement, staff will be able to rely on the adopted standards to prepare clear specifications and proceed directly to competitive bidding without first needing to evaluate or solicit acceptable equipment options. This approach will improve operational efficiency, reduce delays in maintenance projects, and help ensure that replacement components remain compatible with the City’s established systems and maintenance practices.
The City of San Jacinto invites proposals from qualified firms with experience in landscape architecture, urban design, park planning, irrigation system design, and municipal development standards. The selected consultant will work closely with City staff to review existing materials, evaluate best practices from comparable jurisdictions, and prepare a comprehensive set of standards that are practical to implement and maintain.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 6
2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this project is to develop a comprehensive set of Citywide Landscape, Irrigation, Park, Basin, Parkway, and Street Tree Design Standards that will guide the design, construction, rehabilitation, and long-term maintenance of landscaping, park facilities, stormwater basins, basin pumps, and related infrastructure throughout the City of San Jacinto.
The City currently relies on a combination of older landscape guidelines, standard details, and project-specific requirements that have evolved over time. Some of these materials are outdated, incomplete, or difficult for applicants and staff to locate and interpret. As development activity continues throughout the City, there is a need to consolidate, update, and modernize these materials into a single coordinated set of standards that clearly define the City’s expectations for public landscaping, park development, and streetscape improvements.
The resulting standards will apply to landscaping, park improvements, stormwater basins, basin pump facilities, parkways, streetscapes, trails, and related amenities constructed throughout the City of San Jacinto. The standards are intended to guide the design of both public and private improvements associated with development projects and City facilities. The standards will also provide guidance for the rehabilitation or replacement of existing landscaping and park facilities, ensuring that improvements installed over time remain consistent with the City’s design expectations and maintenance capabilities.
The establishment of standardized materials, equipment specifications, and construction details will also improve the City’s ability to maintain, repair, and rehabilitate these facilities over time.
By clearly defining acceptable equipment types, park furnishings and amenities (such as playground equipment, shade structures, seating, trash receptacles, and similar features), irrigation components, pump systems, plant materials, and construction practices, the City will be able to streamline maintenance and replacement activities and prepare clear bid specifications without needing to re-evaluate acceptable design options for each project.
The project will also serve as an implementation tool for several existing City policies and plans, including the City’s General Plan 2040, Subdivision regulations related to parkland dedication, and the San Jacinto Trails Master Plan. The updated standards will help ensure that future development contributes to a coordinated system of parks, landscaped corridors, and trail facilities throughout the community.
The City’s intent is to develop standards that are clear, practical, and developer-friendly, allowing applicants to understand the City’s expectations early in the project design process. By providing clearly defined requirements and standardized details, the City seeks to reduce ambiguity during plan review, minimize multiple plan check cycles, and improve the long-term quality and maintainability of public improvements.
This project will be managed by the City’s Public Utilities Department, which will serve as the primary point of coordination for the consultant. However, the development of the standards will require close collaboration across multiple City departments and external agencies. The consultant City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 7 will be expected to work closely with staff from the Planning Division, Parks Division, Stormwater Division, the City’s MS4/NPDES Program, the Building and Safety Division, and Engineering staff to ensure that the standards reflect operational needs, regulatory requirements, and development review processes. Coordination with the Police Department, Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), and Lake Hemet Water District may also be necessary to address public safety considerations, Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles, access requirements, recycled water use, and compatibility with EMWD irrigation and water system standards.
Key objectives of this project include:
• Develop a comprehensive Landscape and Irrigation Standards Manual that consolidates and updates the City’s existing landscape design guidelines, plant lists, and standard construction details into a single coordinated document. • Review the City’s existing Development Code and related municipal code provisions governing landscape design, irrigation, park development, and subdivision improvements to ensure the proposed standards are consistent with adopted regulations. The consultant shall identify any conflicts, gaps, or outdated provisions and recommend updates or crossreferences so that the Development Code and the new standards manual function as a coordinated and internally consistent framework.
• Prepare Park Development Standards that establish park classifications, minimum park sizes, amenity requirements, and design expectations consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements and the Quimby Act.
• Establish design and equipment standards for stormwater basins and associated infrastructure, including landscape treatments, access requirements, fencing, safety features, and basin pump facilities where applicable.
• Develop a flexible park amenity framework that allows developers to design parks that respond to site conditions while still providing a consistent level of recreational value through minimum amenity categories and a scoring or point-based evaluation system. • Define standardized design criteria for park features and amenities including playground equipment, sport courts, seating areas, shade structures, irrigation systems, lighting, drinking fountains, picnic areas, and other common park infrastructure to promote consistent design quality, durability, and maintainability across parks developed throughout the City.
• Promote consistency in materials, equipment, and construction practices to improve durability, reduce lifecycle costs, and support efficient long-term maintenance of City facilities.
• Develop landscape and irrigation design standards that are consistent with the California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and the City’s adopted City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 8 Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, ensuring that the resulting guidelines support compliance with existing regulatory requirements without creating conflicting or redundant standards.
• Provide implementation guidance for the San Jacinto Trails Master Plan, including trail classifications, cross sections, and design standards for trail facilities constructed as part of development projects.
• Prepare prototypical water-efficient residential front yard landscape designs that homeowners and builders may utilize when installing or rehabilitating landscaping. These designs should comply with applicable water efficiency requirements and be structured so that typical residential landscape installations can be completed without the need to retain a landscape architect.
• Create a clear, accessible, and user-friendly standards document that includes diagrams, standard details, graphic illustrations, photographs, and example applications to help developers, designers, homeowners, contractors, and City staff easily understand and apply the standards.
Ultimately, the goal of this project is to establish a practical and implementable set of standards that improves the quality, consistency, and long-term sustainability of landscaping, parks, basins, and streetscape facilities throughout the City of San Jacinto while supporting efficient project review, construction, and long-term maintenance operations.
The resulting documents should be organized in a manner that is highly intuitive and easy to navigate, with clearly structured sections, searchable content, cross-referenced standards, and visual examples that illustrate acceptable design solutions. The City anticipates that the standards may be organized into logical sections or chapters addressing topics such as landscape and irrigation design, park development, parkway and streetscape standards, basin facilities, and related infrastructure.
The City intends for the final standards manual to function not only as a regulatory document, but also as a practical design and implementation guide that applicants and staff can quickly reference during project planning, review, construction, and maintenance.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 9
3. EXISTING PLANS AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
The City of San Jacinto has prepared and adopted several planning and design documents over time that address landscaping, parks, streetscapes, and open space development. These documents provide important background information and may inform the development of the new standards.
However, many of these materials are outdated, incomplete, or lacking the intuitive design necessary for efficient use by stakeholders and City personnel.
The consultant will be expected to review these materials and evaluate their applicability to the proposed Citywide Landscape, Irrigation, Park, and Street Tree Design Standards. Where appropriate, relevant standards and design concepts may be incorporated into the updated document. In other cases, the consultant may recommend revisions, reorganization, or replacement of outdated standards.
The City recognizes that many landscape and park design standards, construction details, and technical specifications used by public agencies are based on widely accepted industry practices.
The City is open to the incorporation or adaptation of proven standards, graphics, and technical details from other jurisdictions or previous consultant work where appropriate. The intent of this project is not to recreate common design details unnecessarily, but rather to assemble a practical and well-organized set of standards that reflect best practices and are tailored to the operational needs of the City of San Jacinto.
The following documents are provided for reference and will be made available to proposers through the City’s PlanetBids procurement portal.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO GENERAL PLAN
The City adopted Envision San Jacinto, General Plan 2040 in 2022. The General Plan establishes the City’s long-term vision for growth, land use, environmental sustainability, and community design. Policies related to parks, open space, streetscapes, sustainability, and community character should inform the development of the updated standards.
SAN JACINTO TRAILS MASTER PLAN
The San Jacinto Trails Master Plan identifies a system of multi-use trails and equestrian corridors intended to connect neighborhoods, parks, and open space areas throughout the community. The consultant shall review the Trails Master Plan and develop design standards, cross sections, and implementation guidance to support the construction of trail facilities as part of future development projects.
LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The City previously adopted Landscape Design Guidelines that provide direction related to planting, parkway landscaping, wall and fence design, and other landscape elements. These City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 10 guidelines include plant palettes, planting details, and standard construction specifications. While portions of these guidelines may still be applicable, the document has not been comprehensively updated in many years and will require evaluation and modernization.
LANDSCAPE STANDARD DETAILS
The City maintains a series of landscape and planting standard details that address items such as tree planting, shrub planting, irrigation components, root barriers, and related landscape construction practices. These details may serve as a starting point for the development of updated standard construction details.
DRAFT LANDSCAPE GUIDELINE UPDATE
In approximately 2017, the City initiated an effort to update its landscape design guidelines. Draft materials from that effort include proposed plant lists, irrigation guidance, and other landscape design recommendations. These materials were never formally adopted and have not been reviewed by current City staff. They are being provided to the consultant team as background reference material only. The consultant may review these materials and determine whether any elements should be incorporated, revised, or replaced as part of the new standards.
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS The City’s subdivision regulations, including parkland dedication requirements associated with residential development, are contained in Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the San Jacinto Municipal Code. Of particular relevance to this project are the provisions in Chapter 16.75 (Parkland Dedication and Fees), which implement parkland dedication requirements authorized under California Government Code Section 66477 (Quimby Act) and establish the methodology used to determine required park acreage based on projected residential population.
The updated park standards developed through this project should support the implementation of these subdivision requirements by providing clear guidance regarding park classifications, amenity expectations, and park development standards associated with new residential subdivisions.
The San Jacinto Municipal Code is available online and may be accessed at:
https://ecode360.com/47024306.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 11
4. SCOPE OF WORK
The City of San Jacinto is seeking a qualified consultant to assist in the preparation of comprehensive Citywide Landscape, Irrigation, Park, Basin, Parkway, and Street Tree Design Standards. The selected consultant will work collaboratively with City staff to review existing materials, evaluate best practices from comparable jurisdictions, and develop a coordinated set of standards to guide the design, construction, and rehabilitation of public landscaping and park facilities throughout the City.
The standards will primarily apply to landscaping, park improvements, stormwater basins, parkways, trails, and related amenities that will ultimately be owned, operated, or maintained by the City, including improvements constructed as part of private development projects or through Community Facilities Districts (CFDs). The standards should also provide guidance for the rehabilitation or replacement of existing City landscape and park facilities.
The consultant shall perform the tasks described below and/or may recommend modifications to the scope of work if necessary to better achieve the project objectives.
TASK 1 – PROJECT INITIATION AND COORDINATION
The consultant shall initiate the project and coordinate with City staff to confirm project objectives, scope, schedule, and deliverables. This task shall include a project kickoff meeting with City staff, review of existing plans and background materials provided by the City, and confirmation of the proposed structure and organization of the standards manual. The consultant shall also identify opportunities to incorporate best practices from comparable jurisdictions and confirm the overall work plan for completing the project.
Deliverables under this task include:
• Project kickoff meeting with City staff
• Detailed work plan and project schedule identifying key milestones and deliverables TASK 2 – REVIEW OF EXISTING DOCUMENTS AND BEST PRACTICES The consultant shall review existing City plans and reference documents to inform development of the updated standards. This review shall include existing landscape guidelines, plant lists, landscape standard details, and other materials previously prepared by the City. The consultant shall also review relevant planning documents, including the San Jacinto Trails Master Plan and subdivision regulations contained in Title 16 of the Municipal Code.
In addition, the consultant shall review applicable provisions of the California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance to ensure the proposed standards support compliance with existing regulatory requirements. Best City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 12 practices used by comparable jurisdictions for park development standards, irrigation systems, landscape design, and street tree programs should also be evaluated.
Deliverables under this task include:
• A summary memorandum of findings and recommendations to guide development of the updated standards.
• A code and standards cross-reference matrix identifying where the San Jacinto Municipal Code, including relevant provisions of the Development Code, references landscape, park, irrigation, basin, or related standards. The matrix shall also identify any conflicts, gaps, or recommended code cleanups or cross-reference updates necessary to ensure the Development Code and the new standards manual function as a coordinated and internally consistent framework.
TASK 3 – PARK CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK AND PARK DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The consultant shall develop a framework that establishes consistent expectations for park size, amenities, and development requirements associated with new residential development. The framework shall include development of a park classification system, which may include categories such as pocket parks, neighborhood parks, community parks, and regional parks, along with recommended park size ranges and general characteristics for each classification.
Standards should address usable park area, including treatment of slopes, drainage areas, and site constraints, and should coordinate with parkland dedication requirements established in Title 16 of the Municipal Code. Park amenity expectations should be based on the required parkland acreage associated with development rather than the total park site area when additional land is provided due to site constraints such as floodplains, fault zones, or other development limitations.
The consultant shall also develop a flexible park amenity evaluation framework that allows developers to respond to site conditions while ensuring each park provides an appropriate level of recreational value. This framework may include amenity categories, minimum amenity expectations by park classification, and a scoring or point-based system to ensure consistency across developments while allowing flexibility in park design.
Deliverables under this task include:
• Park classification framework
• Park amenity evaluation framework or scoring system
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 13 TASK 4 – PARK AMENITY DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT STANDARDS
The consultant shall develop design and construction standards for common park amenities and park infrastructure. These standards should establish consistent expectations for materials, equipment types, and construction practices that promote durability, safety, and efficient long-term maintenance by the City.
Standards should address common park features such as playground equipment and surfacing, sport courts and athletic areas, seating and picnic areas, shade structures and gazebos, drinking fountains, park utilities, lighting, and landscape and irrigation systems associated with park development.
Deliverables under this task include:
Design standards and preferred equipment specifications for common park amenities.
TASK 5 – LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION DESIGN STANDARDS
The consultant shall prepare updated landscape and irrigation design standards applicable to public landscaping installed through development projects or rehabilitation of existing facilities. These standards shall address planting design, plant palettes appropriate for different landscape conditions, irrigation system design consistent with City maintenance practices, and preferred irrigation equipment currently utilized by the City.
Standards should include planting requirements, irrigation design criteria, root barrier requirements, and updated standard construction details for planting and irrigation systems.
Landscape standards for detention basins and water quality facilities should also be included where applicable.
The standards developed under this task shall support compliance with the California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
Deliverables under this task include:
• Landscape design standards and plant palettes
• Irrigation system standards and standard construction details TASK 6 – STREET TREE AND PARKWAY STANDARDS
The consultant shall prepare a Citywide street tree and parkway standards program addressing tree selection, planting design, and parkway landscaping associated with public streets. The program should identify appropriate tree species for the City’s climate and soil conditions, establish spacing and placement standards, and address varying parkway widths and roadway classifications.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 14 Standards should also address site constraints such as overhead utilities and provide guidance for layered landscaping approaches in areas such as reverse frontage parkways.
Deliverables under this task include:
Citywide street tree program and parkway landscaping standards.
TASK 7 – TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS The consultant shall prepare design standards supporting implementation of the San Jacinto Trails Master Plan. These standards should establish trail classifications, typical trail cross sections, recommended construction materials and should address integration of trail facilities within parks, subdivisions, and open space areas.
Deliverables under this task include:
Trail classifications and standard trail design guidance.
TASK 8 – PROTOTYPICAL RESIDENTIAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE DESIGNS The consultant shall prepare a set of prototypical water-efficient residential front yard landscape designs that homeowners and builders may utilize when installing or rehabilitating residential landscaping. These designs should incorporate water-efficient plant palettes and irrigation layouts consistent with MWELO requirements and should be designed so that typical residential installations can be implemented without requiring a landscape architect.
Deliverables under this task include:
At least four (4) prototypical front yard landscape designs with corresponding irrigation layouts.
TASK 9 – BASIN AND STORMWATER FACILITY DESIGN STANDARDS The consultant shall prepare landscape and facility design standards for stormwater detention basins and related stormwater infrastructure. These standards should address planting approaches appropriate for basin conditions, irrigation requirements where applicable, grading transitions and slopes, and integration with adjacent parks, trails, or open space areas. Standards shall be developed in coordination with the Stormwater Division and MS4/NPDES program requirements, including maintainability, access, safety, and treatment facility performance considerations.
Where basin pump systems are utilized, the consultant shall also address considerations related to maintenance access, operational functionality, preferred equipment and integration of pump infrastructure within landscaped basin environments.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 15 Deliverables under this task include:
Landscape and design standards for stormwater basins and related facilities. Preferred equipment specifications for stormwater basins.
TASK 10 – PREPARATION OF DRAFT AND FINAL STANDARDS MANUAL The consultant shall prepare a comprehensive standards manual consolidating the results of the project into a coordinated, intuitive and user-friendly document. The manual shall include diagrams, illustrations, photographs, example applications, and standard construction details. The document should be organized so that users can easily locate and cross-reference applicable standards.
All graphics, standard details, and exhibits shall follow a consistent City formatting and numbering convention so the final document reads as a cohesive standards manual rather than a collection of materials from multiple sources.
Deliverables under this task include:
• Draft standards manual for City review
• Final standards manual incorporating City comments
TASK 11 – MEETINGS AND PROJECT COORDINATION
The consultant shall participate in meetings necessary to complete the project and present draft and final standards to City decision makers.
Deliverables under this task include:
• Regular coordination meetings with City staff
• Presentation of draft standards to City staff
• Attendance at one Planning Commission meeting
• Attendance at one City Council meeting to present the final standards TASK 12 – IMPLEMENTATION AND ADOPTION SUPPORT
The consultant shall provide limited support to assist the City with final implementation and adoption of the standards manual. This task is intended to address minor revisions, clarifications, or formatting adjustments that may arise during the final review and adoption process.
Work under this task may include refinement of graphics or standard details, clarification of standards language, preparation of supplemental materials requested by City staff, or assistance responding to comments received during Planning Commission or City Council review.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 16 Support provided under this task shall be limited to revisions necessary to finalize the standards manual for adoption and publication and shall conclude upon City Council adoption of the standards.
Deliverables under this task may include:
• Minor revisions to the standards manual following City review • Supplemental graphics or clarification of standards where requested by the City • Assistance with final document formatting or preparation for publication City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 17
5. DELIVERABLES
The consultant shall prepare and submit the following deliverables as part of this project.
Deliverables shall be provided in both digital and editable formats to allow the City to maintain and update the standards over time, including editable source files for graphics, diagrams, and standard details.
Unless otherwise directed by the City, all documents shall be submitted in electronic format. Draft deliverables will be reviewed by City staff and revised by the consultant prior to preparation of final deliverables.
1. PROJECT WORK PLAN AND SCHEDULE
Within thirty (30) days of contract execution, the consultant shall prepare a detailed work plan and project schedule outlining major tasks, milestones, and anticipated deliverables.
The work plan shall include:
• Project schedule and timeline
• Key milestones, stakeholders and review periods
• Proposed meeting schedule
• Communication and coordination procedures
2. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND BEST PRACTICES SUMMARY
The consultant shall prepare a technical memorandum summarizing findings from the review of existing City documents and best practices from comparable jurisdictions. The memorandum shall identify key issues, opportunities, and recommendations that will guide preparation of the updated standards.
The memorandum shall summarize relevant City plans, guidelines, and existing landscape and irrigation standards, and evaluate their applicability to the proposed standards manual.
Deliverables shall include:
• Identification of best practices and recommended approaches from comparable jurisdictions
• Key considerations that inform the development of the updated standards City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 18
3. ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT STANDARDS MANUAL
The consultant shall prepare an Administrative Draft of the Citywide Landscape, Irrigation, Park, Basin, Parkway, and Street Tree Design Standards for review by City staff. The standards may be organized as a single manual or as multiple coordinated volumes or sections, as determined appropriate in consultation with City staff.
The Administrative Draft shall include all major components of the standards manual, including:
• Park classification framework and park development standards • Park amenity standards and amenity evaluation framework • Landscape and irrigation design standards
• Street tree and parkway standards
• Trails and open space implementation standards
• Prototypical residential front yard landscape designs • Standard construction details and specifications
• Basin and stormwater facility design and standards
City staff will review the Administrative Draft and provide consolidated comments to the consultant.
4. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT STANDARDS MANUAL
Following incorporation of staff comments, the consultant shall prepare a Public Review Draft of the standards manual.
This version will be used for presentations to decision-making bodies and may be distributed for public review.
The Public Review Draft shall:
• Be organized in a clear, visually accessible format
• Include diagrams, graphics, and example applications
• Include cross-references and clear section headings to improve usability
5. FINAL STANDARDS MANUAL
The consultant shall prepare a Final Standards Manual incorporating comments received from City staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council, as applicable.
The final document shall be delivered in the following formats:
• Searchable PDF document with bookmarks and internal hyperlinks City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 19 • Editable document format (Microsoft Word or similar)
• Graphics and diagrams in editable format (Adobe Illustrator, InDesign, or similar) All graphics, standard drawings, diagrams, and exhibits shall follow a consistent City of San Jacinto formatting, numbering, and labeling convention so that the final document appears as a cohesive standards manual rather than a compilation of materials from multiple sources. The document shall be structured to allow future updates by City staff without requiring complete reformatting.
6. STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
The consultant shall prepare updated standard construction details supporting the standards manual.
Deliverables shall include:
• Landscape planting details
• Irrigation system details
• Root barrier and planting installation details
• Parkway and streetscape sections
• Park amenity installation details
• Trail cross sections and construction details
• Basin landscape and facility standard details (grading transitions, pump access areas, planting zones, etc.)
All details shall be provided in:
• CAD format compatible with City systems
• PDF format for inclusion in the standards manual
• Plant palettes, street tree lists, and related data tables shall be provided in spreadsheet format compatible with the City’s GIS or asset management systems.
7. PROTOTYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE PLANS
The consultant shall prepare a set of prototypical residential front yard landscape plans.
Deliverables shall include:
• Graphic landscape plans
• Corresponding irrigation layouts
• Plant lists and planting schedules
• Example installation diagrams
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 20 These materials shall be prepared in a format suitable for distribution to homeowners and builders.
8. PARK PLANNING TOOLKIT
The consultant shall prepare a Park Planning Toolkit to assist City staff and developers in evaluating park design proposals.
The toolkit may include:
• Park classification summary tables
• Park amenity scoring framework
• Amenity category definitions
• Example park programming layouts
This toolkit will be used by City staff during project review to evaluate compliance with park development standards.
9. PROJECT MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS
The consultant shall prepare presentation materials and attend key project meetings necessary to complete the project, including:
• Project kickoff meeting
• Periodic coordination meetings with City staff
• Planning Commission presentation
• City Council presentation
Presentation materials shall be provided in digital format suitable for public meetings.
10. FINAL PROJECT FILES
At the completion of the project, the consultant shall provide the City with a complete set of project files including:
• Final standards manual
• Editable source files
• Graphics and diagrams
• CAD standard details
• Plant lists and data tables
All materials prepared under this contract shall become the property of the City of San Jacinto and may be used, reproduced, or modified by the City for future projects without restriction.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 21
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE
The City anticipates completing the project within approximately six (6) to nine (9) months from contract execution. The schedule below represents the City’s preliminary timeline and may be adjusted as necessary during the course of the project.
Proposers may recommend adjustments to the schedule in their proposals if necessary to successfully complete the scope of work.
Milestone Estimated Timeline
Release of Request for Proposals 4/1/2026
Proposal Submission Deadline 4/27/26
Consultant Selection and Contract Award 5/5/26
Project Kickoff Meeting Within 2 weeks of contract execution Existing Conditions Review and Best Practices
Summary Month 1–2
Administrative Draft Standards Manual Month 3–4
Staff Review and Revisions Month 4–5
Public Review Draft Standards Manual Month 5–6
Planning Commission Presentation Month 6–7
City Council Presentation and Adoption Month 7–9
The consultant shall coordinate closely with City staff throughout the project to ensure that key milestones are met and that adequate time is provided for staff review and revisions.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 22
7. CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS
The City of San Jacinto is seeking proposals from qualified consulting firms or teams with demonstrated experience in the preparation of municipal landscape design standards, park planning standards, irrigation design standards, and street tree programs. The selected consultant will assist the City in developing a comprehensive set of standards that are practical to implement, consistent with applicable regulations, and compatible with the City’s long-term maintenance capabilities.
Proposers should demonstrate experience with projects similar in scope and complexity to the work described in this Request for Proposals. Relevant experience includes the preparation of landscape design guidelines, park planning standards, irrigation design standards, street tree master plans, or similar development standards for municipalities. Experience working with cities experiencing residential growth and subdivision development is particularly desirable.
The consultant team should include professionals with expertise in landscape architecture, park and recreation planning, irrigation system design, and municipal development standards.
Familiarity with water-efficient landscape practices and the California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) is expected. Experience integrating park planning, landscaping, and streetscape design into subdivision development standards is also desirable. Where preparation of technical standards or construction details requires professional licensure under California law, the consultant team shall include appropriately licensed professionals, such as a California licensed Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or other qualified professional, as applicable.
Proposers shall identify the key personnel who will be assigned to the project and describe their qualifications and experience. The proposal should clearly identify the Project Manager and describe the roles and responsibilities of other key team members who will contribute to the project. The City expects that the Project Manager identified in the proposal will remain actively involved throughout the duration of the project.
Proposers should also demonstrate familiarity with regulatory and policy considerations relevant to this project, including parkland dedication requirements under Government Code Section 66477 (Quimby Act), municipal landscape and irrigation standards, and development review processes associated with subdivision projects.
As part of the proposal, firms should provide examples of recent projects that demonstrate relevant experience. These examples should include the project name and location, the client agency, a brief description of the work performed, and a contact person who can serve as a reference. Projects involving the preparation of municipal design standards or park planning guidelines will be given particular consideration.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 23
8. PROPOSAL FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Proposals should be concise, well organized, and demonstrate the consultant’s understanding of the City’s objectives and ability to perform the work described in this Request for Proposals.
Proposals should follow the general format outlined below so that all submissions can be evaluated consistently.
GENERAL FORMAT REQUIREMENTS
All proposals shall be formatted on 8.5” x 11” pages. Larger graphics or diagrams may be included on 11” x 17” pages where appropriate. Proposals must be submitted in PDF format and must be printable without password protection.
All proposal materials, except the Fee Proposal and sample work products, shall be combined into a single PDF file. The Fee Proposal shall be submitted as a separate PDF document. Sample work products or examples of similar projects shall be submitted as separate PDF attachments and shall not be included within the primary proposal document.
Proposals must be submitted electronically through the City’s PlanetBids portal. Proposals submitted by email, mail, or in person will not be accepted.
Page limits provided below are intended to encourage concise responses. Page limits apply only to the primary proposal document and do not include the Fee Proposal or separate sample work attachments submitted in accordance with this section. The City reserves the right to disregard pages submitted in excess of the stated limits.
PROPOSAL CONTENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (2 PAGES MAXIMUM)
Provide a brief overview of the proposing firm and a summary of the key elements of the proposal.
The Executive Summary should clearly describe the firm’s qualifications, understanding of the City’s objectives, and the unique strengths the team brings to this project.
The summary should also identify the proposed Project Manager and briefly describe the composition of the consultant team, including key personnel and their roles on the project.
Proposers should identify the primary office that will be responsible for managing the project and describe how the team will be organized to deliver the services described in this Request for Proposals.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 24 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE (15 PAGES MAXIMUM) This section should describe the qualifications of the proposing firm and demonstrate its experience with projects of similar scope and complexity. Proposers should describe their experience preparing municipal landscape design standards, irrigation standards, park planning guidelines, street tree programs, or similar planning and design standards for public agencies.
Proposers should also highlight experience developing comprehensive standards manuals or design guidelines that integrate landscaping, parks, streetscapes, trails, stormwater facilities, or other public infrastructure that will ultimately be maintained by a municipality.
Include descriptions of three to five recent projects that are most relevant to the work described in this RFP. For each project, identify the client, the general scope of work, the year completed, and the role of the firm.
If applicable, describe experience working with California cities, particularly in Southern California or in climates similar to the City of San Jacinto.
PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING (10 PAGES MAXIMUM)
Identify the proposed project team and describe the roles and responsibilities of key personnel.
This section should demonstrate that the consultant has assembled a team with the technical expertise necessary to complete the work described in this RFP.
Provide an organizational chart showing the Project Manager and key staff who will be assigned to the project. Brief resumes should be included for key personnel who will have primary responsibility for completing the work. Resumes should identify each individual’s role on the project, relevant experience, professional licenses or certifications, and office location.
Proposers should confirm the availability of key personnel identified in the proposal and describe their anticipated level of involvement throughout the project.
If subconsultants are proposed, identify their roles and explain how they will support the project team.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH (20 PAGES MAXIMUM) This section should demonstrate the consultant’s understanding of the City’s goals and the scope of work described in this RFP. Proposers should describe their overall approach to developing clear, practical, and implementable standards that will guide landscape design, irrigation systems, park development, basin facilities, trails, and street tree planning within the City.
The resulting standards will be used by a range of audiences including design professionals, developers, City staff, and members of the public. Proposers should describe how they will prepare standards that maintain the technical rigor necessary for engineering and design professionals City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 25 while remaining clearly written, well organized, and understandable for users who may not have specialized technical expertise.
Proposers should describe how they will approach development of a coordinated standards manual that is practical for developers to implement, consistent with applicable regulations, and compatible with the City’s long-term maintenance practices.
The proposal should explain how the consultant will approach the following key components of the project:
• Development of comprehensive landscape, irrigation, park, basin, and street tree standards that are practical and easy to implement
• Preparation of developer-friendly standards that streamline project review and reduce plan check iterations
• Development of prototypical front yard landscape concepts that allow homeowners to revitalize their landscaping and comply with water efficiency requirements without the need to hire a landscape architect
• Integration of existing City plans and policies, including the Subdivision Code, Trails Master Plan, and other planning documents
• Development of standardized details, equipment specifications, and design guidance that support efficient long-term maintenance of City facilities • Preparation of a final document that is visually clear, searchable, well organized, and easy for developers, homeowners, and City staff to use
Proposers may also identify any additional tasks, technical considerations, or recommendations that would improve the overall quality, usability, and long-term effectiveness of the final standards manual.
PROJECT SCHEDULE AND WORK PLAN (5 PAGES MAXIMUM)
Provide a proposed work plan and project schedule describing how the consultant will complete the work within the City’s anticipated timeframe. The schedule should identify major project phases, key milestones, and anticipated review points with City staff.
FEE PROPOSAL (SUBMITTED AS A SEPARATE DOCUMENT)
The Fee Proposal shall be submitted as a separate PDF document and shall include a not-to-exceed fee for completion of the project. The fee proposal should include a breakdown of costs by task or project phase and identify hourly rates for key personnel who may be assigned to the project.
The City reserves the right to negotiate the final scope and fee with the selected consultant.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 26
EXCEPTIONS TO THE RFP OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT If the proposer believes any portion of this Request for Proposals or the City’s draft Professional Services Agreement requires clarification or modification, the proposer must clearly identify those items in this section of the proposal. Each requested exception shall identify the applicable section of the RFP or Professional Services Agreement and include a brief explanation of the reason for the proposed change. Where appropriate, proposers may also provide suggested alternative language.
Requests for clarification regarding the RFP requirements must be submitted through the formal question and answer process on the City’s PlanetBids portal prior to the deadline for questions.
The City may respond to such questions and, if necessary, issue an addendum to clarify or modify the RFP. The submission of an exception within a proposal does not substitute for the formal question and answer process.
The City reserves the right to accept or reject any proposed exception. Proposals containing significant or material exceptions to the requirements of this RFP or the Professional Services Agreement may be deemed non-responsive and may be rejected at the City’s sole discretion.
If no exceptions are identified, the proposal will be interpreted to mean that the proposer accepts all terms and conditions of this Request for Proposals and the City’s Professional Services Agreement.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (OPTIONAL)
Proposers may include additional information they believe would assist the City in evaluating their proposal. Examples may include sample documents, excerpts from previously prepared standards manuals, graphic examples of similar work products, or other materials demonstrating the firm’s experience with similar projects.
Examples of previous work products should be submitted as separate PDF attachments rather than included within the primary proposal document. These materials are intended to supplement the proposal and demonstrate the quality and organization of similar standards documents prepared by the proposer.
Additional materials provided under this section are optional and will not be evaluated as a separate scored component of the proposal. Any such materials will be reviewed only in conjunction with the information provided in the primary proposal document.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 27
9. PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
All proposals received in response to this Request for Proposals will be evaluated by a review committee composed of City staff. Proposals will be evaluated based on the consultant’s qualifications, relevant experience, project approach, and ability to successfully complete the work described in this RFP.
The City reserves the right to request clarifications, conduct interviews with selected firms, or request additional information as part of the evaluation process.
Proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
The City will evaluate the consultant’s experience preparing municipal landscape standards, park planning documents, irrigation standards, or similar planning and design documents for public agencies. Consideration will also be given to experience working with California municipalities and familiarity with regulatory requirements such as the California Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points
Firm Qualifications and Relevant Experience 25
Project Team and Key Personnel 20
Project Understanding and Technical Approach 30
Project Schedule and Work Plan 10
Fee Proposal 15
Total Possible Points 100
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 28
PROJECT TEAM AND KEY PERSONNEL
The City will evaluate the qualifications, experience, and availability of the proposed project manager and key staff assigned to the project, as well as the overall organization of the project team.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
Proposals will be evaluated based on the consultant’s understanding of the City’s goals and the proposed approach to completing the work described in this RFP. Particular consideration will be given to the consultant’s ability to develop clear, practical, and implementable standards that are easy for developers, homeowners, and City staff to use.
PROJECT SCHEDULE AND WORK PLAN
The City will evaluate the proposed project schedule, including the consultant’s ability to complete the work within the anticipated timeframe and to coordinate effectively with City staff throughout the project.
FEE PROPOSAL
The City will evaluate the proposed project fee in relation to the scope of services and the value offered by the consultant.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 29
10. CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
The City will review all proposals received by the deadline and evaluate them based on the criteria outlined in Section 8 of this Request for Proposals. A review committee composed of City staff will evaluate the proposals and may prepare a shortlist of the most qualified firms.
At the City’s discretion, shortlisted firms may be invited to participate in interviews or presentations to further discuss their qualifications, project approach, and ability to successfully complete the work described in this RFP. If interviews are conducted, the City may revise the evaluation scores based on the information presented during the interview process.
Following the evaluation process, the City intends to select the firm determined to be the most qualified to perform the services described in this RFP. The City will enter into negotiations with the selected consultant to finalize the scope of work, project schedule, and fee. If the City is unable to reach agreement with the selected consultant, the City reserves the right to terminate negotiations and enter into negotiations with the next highest-ranked firm.
The final selection of a consultant and approval of the Professional Services Agreement will be subject to approval by the City Council.
The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive minor irregularities in any proposal, and to cancel this solicitation at any time if it is determined to be in the best interest of the City.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 30
11. GENERAL CONDITIONS AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
The City reserves the right to modify, postpone, or cancel this Request for Proposals at any time if it is determined to be in the best interest of the City. The City also reserves the right to reject any or all proposals received and to waive minor irregularities or informalities in any proposal.
Issuance of this Request for Proposals does not obligate the City to award a contract or to pay any costs incurred by proposers in the preparation of proposals. All costs associated with the preparation and submission of proposals are the sole responsibility of the proposer.
All proposals submitted in response to this RFP become the property of the City of San Jacinto and will not be returned. Proposals may become public records subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act following completion of the selection process. If a proposer includes information it believes to be confidential, proprietary, or a trade secret, such information must be clearly marked and identified as such. The City cannot guarantee confidentiality and will process any public records requests in accordance with applicable law.
Proposals shall remain valid for at least 120 days after the proposal due date unless extended by mutual agreement.
Proposers must disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest, including any circumstances that could reasonably be perceived to affect the proposer’s objectivity or ability to perform the services in the best interest of the City. The City reserves the right to disqualify any proposer based on a conflict of interest determination.
The City reserves the right to request clarification of any information submitted in a proposal and may request additional information from any proposer as part of the evaluation process. The City may also request interviews or presentations from selected firms if it determines that such interviews would assist in the evaluation of proposals.
The City reserves the right to negotiate the final scope of services, project schedule, and compensation with the selected consultant. If an agreement cannot be reached with the selected firm, the City reserves the right to terminate negotiations and proceed with negotiations with the next highest-ranked firm.
The City may issue written addenda to clarify or modify this Request for Proposals. All addenda will be issued through the City’s PlanetBids portal. It is the responsibility of proposers to monitor the PlanetBids portal for addenda and to acknowledge receipt of all addenda in their proposal submission.
The selected consultant will be required to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with the City of San Jacinto. The draft Professional Services Agreement is provided with this RFP for review. Insurance, indemnification, and other contractual requirements will be governed by the terms of the Professional Services Agreement.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 31
PROTEST PROCEDURE
A proposer that wishes to protest the City’s notice of intent to award must submit a written protest within five (5) business days of the notice of intent to award. The protest must be submitted to the City representative identified in this RFP and must clearly describe the basis for the protest. The City Manager or their designee will review the protest and issue a written determination. The decision of the City shall be final.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 32
12. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
A draft Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is included with this Request for Proposals as an attachment. The agreement establishes the City’s standard contractual requirements, including insurance requirements, indemnification provisions, and general terms governing the performance of professional services.
The consultant selected through this RFP process will be required to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with the City of San Jacinto using the attached document. The City anticipates that the selected consultant will execute the agreement substantially in the form provided.
Proposers should carefully review the draft Professional Services Agreement prior to submitting a proposal. Any requested exceptions or proposed modifications to the agreement must be clearly identified in the proposer’s response in accordance with the section titled Exceptions to the RFP or Professional Services Agreement.
The City reserves the right to reject proposals that include significant exceptions to the Professional Services Agreement. Minor modifications may be considered during contract negotiations at the City’s sole discretion.
The final agreement, including scope of services, project schedule, and compensation, will be negotiated with the selected consultant and will be subject to approval by the San Jacinto City Council.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 33
13. BACKGROUND AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
The following documents are available through the City’s PlanetBids portal and are provided as background reference materials to assist proposers in understanding the City’s existing standards, plans, and regulatory framework related to this project.
These materials are provided for informational purposes only and may not represent current policy or adopted standards. The selected consultant will be expected to review these materials and determine which elements should be retained, modified, or replaced as part of the development of the updated standards.
Reference materials available through PlanetBids may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Contract Documents
• Exhibit 1 - Draft Professional Services Agreement
City Codes and Adopted Plans
• Exhibit 2 - San Jacinto Municipal Code – Title 16 (Subdivision Regulations) • Exhibit 3 - Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040
• Exhibit 4a - San Jacinto Trails Master Plan
• Exhibit 4b - San Jacinto Trails Master Plan Appendices Existing Design Guidelines
• Exhibit 5 - City of San Jacinto Landscape Design Guidelines • Exhibit 6 - Parkway and Median Master Plan
Previous Draft Materials (For Reference Only)
• Exhibit 7 - Draft Landscape and Irrigation Guideline Update Materials These materials are intended to provide context regarding prior planning efforts and existing design guidance. Proposers are expected to review these materials when preparing their proposal; however, the City anticipates that the selected consultant will evaluate these documents and recommend updates or revisions as appropriate.
City of San Jacinto Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards RFP 34
14. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
Proposals must be submitted electronically through the City’s PlanetBids portal by the deadline identified in the RFP schedule. The PlanetBids portal will serve as the official location for proposal submission, RFP updates, addenda, and responses to questions.
Proposers are responsible for monitoring the PlanetBids portal for any updates, clarifications, or addenda issued by the City. Failure to acknowledge issued addenda may result in the proposal being deemed non-responsive.
Proposals submitted after the deadline established in the PlanetBids portal will not be accepted.
The City is not responsible for technical issues experienced by proposers during the submission process.
Questions regarding this Request for Proposals must be submitted through the PlanetBids Q&A module prior to the deadline for questions identified in the RFP schedule. Responses to questions will be posted through PlanetBids and will become part of the official procurement record.
RHA COMMUNITY WORKS
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PARK PLANNING
7111 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92504
SUBMITTED BY:
APRIL 27, 2026
PROPOSAL FOR NO. SJ-PU-26-002:
COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S
LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE
DESIGN STANDARDS
(This page intentionally left blank)
PROPOSAL FOR:
COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S
LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN, PARKWAY
AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS
SUBMITTED BY:
RHA COMMUNITY WORKS
7111 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92504
APRIL 27, 2026
SUBMITTED TO:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
(This page intentionally left blank)
April 27, 2026
City of San Jacinto
Attn: City of San Jacinto Purchasing Division
595 S. San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
RE: Proposal for Comprehensive Update to the City’s Landscape, Irrigation, Park, Basin, Parkway and Street Tree Design Standards (RFP No. SJ-PU-26-002)
Dear Members of the Selection Committee:
RHA Community Works (RHA+CW) is pleased to submit this proposal to partner with the City of San Jacinto in the development of a unified, forward-thinking set of Landscape and Park Design Standards. We understand that as San Jacinto continues to experience significant residential growth, there is a critical need to consolidate disparate guidelines into a single, userfriendly manual that reflects the City’s unique character, ensures long-term maintenance sustainability, and simplifies the development review process.
Our team is uniquely qualified to deliver a manual that balances aesthetic appeal with technical rigor. We bring deep expertise in California-specific mandates, including MWELO compliance and the General Plan 2040 framework, ensuring that the new standards are not only visionary but also legally and functionally enforceable. We also have a headstart, having assisted the City with their San Jacinto Park and Recreation Master Plan and developing the initial Landscape Design Guidelines in 2005.
Key strengths our team brings to this project include:
• Integrated Park Planning & Landscape Architecture: Our firm specializes in creating “scoring systems” and classification frameworks that provide developers with clear recreational requirements while maintaining flexibility for various site conditions.
• Technical Excellence in Water Management: With a focus on sustainable irrigation and basin design, we ensure that public spaces are resilient and cost-effective for the City to maintain over the long term. • Community-Centric Design: We recognize the importance of empowering residents. Our approach includes the development of prototypical, water-efficient front-yard designs that allow homeowners to enhance their property while supporting City-wide water conservation goals.
• Proven Municipal Experience: As a firm with extensive experience in Southern California municipal park planning and grant-funded revitalizations, we understand the nuances of local climate, agricultural heritage, and the specific needs of Inland Empire communities.
RHA Community Works is committed to providing a collaborative and inclusive design process. We look forward to the opportunity to help San Jacinto set a new benchmark for public space excellence. We confirm, Doug Grove and Scott Rice, Managing Partners, are authorized to represent the firm and bind the company to all commitments made in this proposal.
Respectfully submitted,
RHA Community Works
A Strategic Merger of RHA Landscape Architects + Planners and Community Works Design Group Doug Grove ASLA, PLA, LEED AP
Managing Partner
Landscape Architect CA #2799
[email protected]
Phone: 951-781-1930 ext. 121
l a n d s c a p e a r c h i t e c t u r e & p l a n n i n g | i r r i g a t i o n d e s i g n & a u d i t i n g | c a s p & a d a c o n s u l t i n g 7 1 1 1 I N D I A N A a v e n u e , s u i t e 3 0 0 , r i v e r s id e , c a 9 2 5 0 4 ( 9 5 1 ) 3 6 9 - 0 7 0 0 w w w . r h a c w . c o m Scott Rice ASLA, PLA, LEED AP, CASp
Managing Partner
Landscape Architect CA #5111 / NY #2645
Certified Access Specialist CASp-709
[email protected]
Phone: 951-369-0700
(This page intentionally left blank)
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Right Partner for San Jacinto’s Future
The City of San Jacinto is at a pivotal moment of growth. As residential development accelerates, the need for a unified, technically rigorous, and sustainable set of design standards has never been more critical. RHA Community Works (RHA+CW) is uniquely positioned to deliver this comprehensive update. We do not just offer landscape architecture; we offer a partnership rooted in local institutional knowledge, technical excellence, and a proven commitment to San Jacinto’s community fabric.
Why RHA Community Works is the Best Choice
1. Unmatched Local Context & Continuity
Unlike outside firms that must spend weeks learning the local landscape, RHA+CW is already deeply embedded in San Jacinto’s planning ecosystem. Having spearheaded the San Jacinto Parks & Recreation Master Plan, we possess an intimate understanding of the City’s existing assets, maintenance challenges, and the community’s vision for the future. We are not starting from scratch; we are building upon a foundation of success that we helped create.
2. A Unified Standards Manual: From Fragmentation to Clarity Currently, San Jacinto’s design guidance is spread across various documents and municipal codes. RHA+CW specializes in consolidation. Our approach will transform these disparate pieces into a single, intuitive manual.
This “one-stop-shop” resource will provide:
• For City Staff: Streamlined plan-check processes and enforceable standards that reduce administrative friction.
• For Developers: Clear, predictable requirements that eliminate ambiguity and accelerate project timelines. • For Residents: High-quality public spaces and residential tools that enhance property values and community pride.
3. Technical Leadership in Sustainability & Water Management In the face of California’s evolving environmental mandates, RHA+CW leads with technical rigor. Our team includes Certified Access Specialists (CASp) and experts in the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). We ensure that every standard—from basin pump facilities to irrigation trenching—is engineered for long-term operational efficiency. Our “Quality Control Program” ensures that the CAD Standard Details we provide are not just drawings, but high-performance templates that minimize change orders and maintenance costs.
4. Innovative Community Empowerment Tools
A standout feature of our proposal is the development of Prototypical Residential Designs. We recognize that homeowners are vital stakeholders in San Jacinto’s water conservation goals. By providing pre-calculated, MWELO-compliant templates like “Inland Desert” and “Modern Mediterranean,” we empower residents to beautify their properties while simultaneously reducing the City’s residential permitting burden.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
II
Strategic Approach to the Scope of Work
Our methodology is designed to deliver a completed, adopted manual within a 6–9 month window, structured around three core pillars:
• Audit & Alignment: We begin with a comprehensive gap analysis of the General Plan 2040 and existing codes to ensure internal consistency and legal defensibility. • The “Scoring System” for Parks: We will develop a flexible classification framework for parkland and amenities. This ensures that as the City grows, developers provide the appropriate level of recreational value, regardless of site-specific constraints.
• Consensus-Driven Adoption: Leveraging our experience with San Jacinto’s leadership, we will lead the outreach to the Planning Commission and City Council. We focus on articulating the Value Proposition:
how these standards protect the City’s General Fund by reducing maintenance and improving the “Living Infrastructure” of the community.
Leadership Built on Municipal Expertise
To ensure the success of this project, RHA+CW has assembled a leadership team that combines high-level strategic vision with deep technical and regulatory proficiency. • Strategic Vision: Led by Doug Grove, ASLA, LEED AP With decades of experience in large-scale municipal planning, Doug Grove brings an unparalleled background in master planning and community-wide design frameworks. Having served as the Principal-in-Charge for the San Jacinto Parks & Recreation Master Plan, Doug understands the macro-level goals of the City’s General Plan 2040. His expertise ensures that these new design standards are not merely a collection of technical details, but a strategic tool that supports the City’s long-term recreational and economic objectives. • Technical Rigor: Led by Scott Rice, PLA, ASLA, CASp Scott Rice provides the essential technical bridge between design and enforceability. Drawing on his extensive experience as a City Landscape Architect and his background in Plan Check services, Scott understands exactly what municipal staff need to effectively review and approve developer submittals. As a Certified Access Specialist (CASp), he will ensure that all updated standards—from parkway circulation to park amenities—meet the highest benchmarks for accessibility and state compliance, reducing the City’s long-term liability and administrative friction.
Commitment to Excellence
Led by Doug Grove and Scott Rice, RHA Community Works brings the perfect blend of public-sector perspective and private-sector innovation. Our prior experience with the City has refined our ability to deliver documents that are as practical for the maintenance crew as they are visionary for the City Council.
We are ready to hit the ground running to help San Jacinto set a new regional benchmark for public space, sustainability, and design excellence.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
1 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN GROUP - LLC (CWDG)
Doing business as: RHA Community Works (RHA+CW)
Landscape Architecture - Planning
7111 Indiana Avenue, Suite 300
Riverside, California 92504
(951) 369-0700
Federal I.D. 82-1854334 / Registered Small Business # 1769579 California Department of Industrial Relations #: PW-LR-1000707823 SENIOR PRINCIPALS: Doug Grove ASLA, PLA, LEED AP - Managing Partner/ Authorized Signer Scott Rice ASLA, PLA, LEED AP, CASp - Managing Partner/ Authorized Signer MAIN CONTACT: Scott Rice, LLA #5111 (Licensed 20+ years since 2005; expiration date: 12/31/26) [email protected]| (951) 369-0700 office / (909) 754-1257 cell RHA Community Works is a landscape architecture and planning firm based in Riverside, California, with deep, multi-generational roots in the Southern California region. The firm was formed through the shared vision and meticulous craftsmanship of its founders and Managing Partners: Doug Grove, President of RHA Landscape Architects + Planners, and Scott Rice, President of Community Works Design Group. Each founder brings decades of proven leadership and industry experience. Prior to uniting their firms, both Doug and Scott served as successors to the founders of their respective, highly regarded practices.
Our team includes 20 dedicated professionals, including 12 licensed landscape architects, who work collaboratively under a team-based approach directed by the firm’s principals and associates. Our multidisciplinary team bridges the gap between creative vision, technical feasibility, and environmental stewardship. RHA Community Works provides a comprehensive suite of services designed to enhance public spaces while ensuring long-term sustainability:
• Public Works Planning & Design: Expert development of neighborhood and community parks, sports complexes, skate parks, dog parks, and vibrant streetscapes that strengthen community branding. • Specialized Technical Consulting: Targeted expertise in CASp/ADA accessibility auditing, comprehensive tree inventory and management, and advanced water conservation strategies. • Master Planning & Visualization: Site-specific conceptual development supported by 3D photo-realistic rendering and inclusive community outreach programs to build local consensus. • Construction Support: Delivery of meticulous construction documentation, precise cost estimating, and dedicated construction administration to ensure design intent is realized. Our team includes two licensed C-27 landscape contractors.
• Plan Check & Inspection Services: A seamless, dual-layer approach ensuring every project—from initial technical review to final field installation—meets 100% regulatory compliance and the highest construction standards.
• Regulatory Compliance & Sustainability: Proven success assisting Southern California municipalities in navigating complex mandates, including SB 1383 (Organic Waste and Mulching) and AB 1572 (Non-Functional Turf) requirements.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
2 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
A selection of our current on-call contracts are listed below:
City of Highland - On-Call Landscape Architectural Services (1990-present) County of Riverside FM - On-Call Landscape Architectural Services (2000-present) Riverside County Regional Park & Open-Space District - (2011-present) On-Call Landscape Architectural Services
City of Redlands - On-Call Landscape Architectural Services (2012-present) Jurupa Area Recreation & Park District - On-Call Park Plan Check Services (2015-present) County of Riverside EDA - On-Call Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Services (2017-present) City of El Segundo - On-Call Landscape Architecture Services (2019-present) City of Ontario - On-Call Landscape Architecture Services (2019-present) City of Cypress - On-Call Landscape Architecture Services (2019-present) City of Los Angeles - On-Call Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Services (2020-present) Including Recreation & Parks Department, Adaptive Sports City of Palm Springs - On-Call Landscape Architecture Services (2021-present) City of Orange - On-Call Plan Check Services (2021-present) City of Carson - On-Call Landscape Architecture Services (2022-present) City of Anaheim - On-Call Landscape Architecture Services (2023-present) City of Eastvale - On-Call Plan Check & Landscape Architecture Services (2023-present) Including Landscape Architecture, Plan Check and Inspections City of Laguna Beach - On-Call Landscape Architecture & Plan Check Services (2023-present) City of Indian Wells - On-Call Landscape Architecture Services (2023-present) City of Pico Rivera - On-Call Landscape Architecture Services (2023-present) City of Long Beach - On-Call Landscape Architecture Services (2024-present) Our Approach
We utilize a collaborative team approach under the direction of our principals to ensure personalized service and on-budget delivery. Whether managing small area renovations or multi-million dollar new developments, we focus on safety, equity, and sustainability. Our “FUNnel” approach to community engagement ensures that all voices are heard, resulting in designs that truly reflect the interests of the constituents we serve. Our firms feature several leaders with public sector plan check and/or park planning experience, providing our team with a unique consulting perspective since we’ve been on your side of the table.
Integrity & Reliability
The unified firm of RHA+CW maintains an impeccable professional record. Neither RHA nor CWDG has:
• Any failures or refusals to complete a contract.
• Financial interests in other lines of business.
• Active or past claims for money or damages.
• History of Litigation, Adverse Judgments, or “For Cause” terminations.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
3 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
We offer comprehensive planning and design services tailored to the unique needs of each client and project.
Our scope of services includes:
Planning and Design
• Master Planning
• Preliminary Design Development
• Program Development
• Recreation Land-Use Planning
• Site Evaluation and Selection
• Site Planning
• Consensus Building
• General Consulting
• Community Outreach Campaigns
• Landscape Plan Check and Inspection Services
• Accessibility Consulting (CASp)
Construction Documentation and Support
• Working Drawings & Specifications
• Assistance During Bidding
• Construction Observation & Consulting
• Maintenance Guidelines and Observation
Award-Winning Design
RHA Community Works has received numerous accolades from respected organizations, including:
• American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA)
• American Planning Association (APA)
• California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS)
• American Public Works Association (APWA)
• National Association of County Parks and Recreation Officials (NACPRO) Notable award-winning projects include:
• Frisbie Park Expansion, Rialto
• Pikes Peak Park, Norco
• Lucinda Garcia Park, Monrovia
• Dolphin Park All-Abilities Playground, Carson
• Mercado Park, Perris
• California Citrus State Historic Park, Riverside
• Horseshoe Lake Park, Jurupa Valley
• Ayala Park, Bloomington
• Pico Park, Pico Rivera
• White Park, Riverside
• Aliso Viejo Ranch, Aliso Viejo
• Enchanted Hills Park, Perris
• Bob Belt’s Beach Park, Needles
• Rancho Jurupa Park Expansion, Jurupa Valley
• Joe Sampson Park, Rialto
• Piru Skate Park, Piru, Ventura County
• Sycamore Highlands Park, Riverside
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
4 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Proposed Communication Process:
RHA Community Works will utilize Basecamp as our primary project management and collaboration hub, ensuring that City of San Jacinto staff stay connected and informed at every stage. This platform will serve as a vibrant, digital home for all task orders, housing real-time project schedules, meeting minutes, and draft deliverables in one organized space. By inviting the City’s project managers into our workspace, we will provide full visibility into our creative process, allowing for seamless feedback and ensuring that every milestone is met with clear accountability. This streamlined approach will transform coordination into a straightforward, engaging experience, replacing cluttered email chains with a clear, reliable history of all project decisions and assets.
Staff:
The RHA organizational system utilizes a team approach. Under principal management, our project assignments are organized into teams of professionals, with each team led by a managing partner and/or principal based on best fit for each task order/project.
Doug Grove, PLA, ASLA, LEED AP Managing Partner/Landscape Architect Scott Rice, PLA, ASLA, LEED AP, CASp Managing Partner/Landscape Architect Greg Meek, PLA Principal/Landscape Architect
David Black, PLA Associate Principal/Landscape Architect Dan Burkhart, PLA Associate Principal/Landscape Architect Lauren McHugh, PLA Associate Principal/Landscape Architect Allison Rush, PLA. CASp Associate Principal/Landscape Architect Andrew Lytle, PLA
Mike Salazar, PLA
Andres Virata, PLA, ASLA
Andy Emery, PLA
Jennifer Salazar
Analicia Escobar-Gomez, MPA, CPRP
Luke Morris, PLA
Arielle Talley
Senior Project Manager/Landscape Architect
Senior Project Manager/Landscape Architect
Production Manager/Landscape Architect
Construction Administration/Landscape Architect
Associate /Landscape Designer
Director of Community Engagement
Landscape Architect/Native Plant Specialist
Landscape Designer/GIS Specialist
Brian Espinoza Landscape Designer
Jocelyn Aguirre Landscape Designer
Savannah Baca Landscape Designer
Marissa Trout Office Manager
Rebecca Rice Executive Assistant
Personnel Training Program:
RHA Community Works maintains a rigorous personnel training and professional development program designed to ensure our team remains at the forefront of technical and regulatory standards in Southern California. Our staff of 20 professionals, which includes 12 licensed landscape architects, participates in ongoing professional education to maintain active specialized certifications, including CLARB certification, Certified Access Specialist (CASp) continued education credits, and ISA Certified Arborist credentials. Training is conducted on a quarterly basis, focusing on emerging trends in sustainable urban development, permaculture, and the integration of innovative materials. Furthermore, our team undergoes regular internal workshops on Quality Control (QC) protocols to guarantee that all project deliverables meet the high standards of technical excellence and universal design required for municipal public works projects.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
5 Site Specific Master Planning & Concept Development:
Our team excels at developing master plans and multi-phased developments. In addition to vibrant master plan documents our team also develops photo realistic 3-D renderings as part of our design process to ensure a fully cohesive and integrated site. This process allows us to make proactive design decisions for vertical plane elements. We find the 3-D visuals also help garner excitement around important projects and are an integral tool for funding support. As a standard practice, we provide scaled 3-D modeling to help the community understand how the proposed park improvements will actually appear, to help identify any conflicts well ahead of construction.
Community Outreach:
RHA+CW recognizes the need for all voices in a community to be heard and incorporated into thoughtful designs. Our team aims to ensure all members of the community have the opportunity to participate in community outreach and planning processes.
Our team is currently working on final touches for the design of Dolores Huerta Park for the City of Fresno. As part of the preliminary design process, CWDG, now doing business as RHA+CW worked with the City to create a community outreach campaign in 4 different languages (Spanish, Punjabi, Hmong and English), to best serve their community.
We employ what we call the “FUNnel” approach to take the multitude of “wants” and narrow them down to a final concept that reflects the best interests of the City and its constituents- and we do so in a FUN way! We typically start by gathering general information by means of online and mail-out surveys ahead of the public design meetings, with ongoing input from the City, so that we can begin to prepare informed design decisions to facilitate a conceptual design that reflects the community’s interest and not OUR interests. We focus on developing a strong sense of pride for each project by focusing on a placemaking that incorporates the community’s identity.
FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Above: Top renderings: Dolores Huerta Park playground and thematic wind screen for Futsal Multi-Use Courts in Fresno, CA.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
6 Meetings and Presentations:
Our team has experience presenting to a variety of City Staff, Boards and Commissions. Doug Grove, Scott Rice, and Analicia Escobar-Gomez all have extensive experience presenting to special commissions, City Councils and other committees. We also find commissions and committees are a great place for garnering project feedback and support. It is often a good place to start soliciting feedback by going where people are already meeting.
Accessibility Consulting
We provide comprehensive Certified Access Specialist (CASp) services to help ensure your property complies with applicable accessibility standards and regulations. Our evaluations identify potential barriers to access and offer clear, practical recommendations for achieving compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California accessibility codes. Whether for new construction, renovations, or existing facilities, we deliver detailed reports, guidance on corrective measures, and support throughout the compliance process, helping reduce legal risk while promoting inclusive and accessible environments for all users.
Feasibility Studies:
RHA+CW’s most recent Feasibility Study was completed for the City of Ontario as part of our on-call services. For this our team worked with the City to identify and prioritize park amenity renovations with accessibility and available funding in mind.
Utility Search and Coordination:
Our team has extensive experience with utility coordination. In addition, our subconsultants, Design West Engineering and Civil Engineers will assist these coordination efforts.
Contract Documents:
Our team focuses on constructibility by creating Construction Drawings will include site plans and details for all aspects of demolition, construction, civil, grading, planting, irrigation and specialty plans. Our construction details are crafted from a constructibility standpoint, supplemented with item-specific notes that reduce contractor “artistic license” and reduce likelihood of RFI’s. Plans will identify recommended suppliers and products, with emphasis given to local sources, sustainable concepts, recycled/ recyclable materials, and durability of products. Each member of the RHA+CW team integrates their strengths, expertise and experience to ensure the best designs and most complete, constructible, contract documents are completed on-time and within budget for each project we take on.
Cost Estimating:
We regularly prepare detailed construction plans, details, specifications and estimates for park projects, and strive to make our construction drawing packages the most biddable and buildable across the industry. Since we perform Landscape Plan Check for various agencies, our finger remains on the pulse of the industry, and are able to glean tips and tricks to making plans more readable, maintaining a good balance of notes and clarifications without overwhelming the drawings with redundant information. We are regularly receiving bids for various public work projects. Upon receiving the bid we also request from the two apparent low bidders their unit prices. We incorporate these updated unit prices into our own inhouse cost estimates. This allows our firm to provide up-to date cost estimates for our clients.
Permits:
Our team has first hand plan check experience which comes in handy when it comes time to assist the City in obtaining approvals and/or permits from applicable agencies as needed. Our team has experience with the permitting processes with, USACE, CDFW, and SCAQMD.
FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
7 Construction Support:
What sets RHA+CW during the Construction Support/Administration phase is our first hand experience as a licensed contractor, allowing us to closely monitor and track scheduling, budgets, and upcoming inspections. We work hard to drive the construction schedule and keep contractors accountable. We will participate in construction meetings when requested, and at a frequency determined by the City. Based on our observations at the site and on the contractor’s application for payment, we will assist in determining the amount owed to the contractor. We will review job drawings, as-builts, RFI’s, samples and other submissions of the contractor for conformance with the design of the project and for compliance with the information given in the conformance contract documents, for the project. We will review change orders and submittals for approval and issuance by the City. We will respond to requests for information from the contractor, and issue field bulletins. We will maintain updated RFI, Change Order and Submittal logs, which will be shared online via Basecamp app.
FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Storm Water Best Management Practices:
We work with Civil Engineers who have extensive experience with designing using the principles of storm water best management practices (BMP). RHA+CW has also worked on many park and trail projects that feature unique and design integrated storm water BMP’s. Our work with our teams also include WQMPs and SWPPPs where applicable and required.
Environmental:
In addition to Analicia Escobar-Gomez’s background with CEQA/NEPA Compliance for park planning and public landscape projects, she also has background in facilitating AB52 Tribal Consultations.
Design Expertise: RHA+CW has successfully completed over 35 parks and recreation projects in the past five (5) years.
Our team stays up to date on water-wise landscaping and irrigation with our Certified Irrigation Designer taking the lead in staying up to date with new techniques and technologies.
Site Specific Master Planning & Concept Development:
Our team excels at developing master plans and multi-phased developments. In addition to vibrant master plan documents our team also develops photo realistic 3-D renderings as part of our design process to ensure a fully cohesive and integrated site. This process allows us to make proactive design decisions for vertical plane elements. We find the 3-D visuals also help garner excitement around important projects and are an integral tool for funding support. As a standard practice, we provide scaled 3-D modeling to help the community understand how the proposed park improvements will actually appear, to help identify any conflicts well ahead of construction.
Leadership In Energy And Environmental Design
LEED certified and a leader in the design of energy efficient, water-wise parks and public spaces RHA Community Works actively encourages the employment of environmentally friendly sustainable design principles. We encourage clients to use green technologies and design principles to achieve innovative, resource conserving, maintenance friendly public facilities which provide long term budget savings.
Plan Checking Services
We have provided plan-checking services to various agencies for over three decades and have experienced licensed individuals on staff to provide this function. We have provided these services for the Cities of Highland, Banning, Perris, Rialto, Jurupa Valley and Corona.
(This page intentionally left blank)
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
9 EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
RHA, now doing business as, RHA Community Works has a long-standing history with the City of San Jacinto, having authored the City’s original Landscape Design Guidelines and the Parkway & Median Master Plan. Our foundational work established the framework for the City’s visual character and technical standards, covering everything from project-specific design criteria for residential front yards and commercial developments to specialized sections on slope stabilization and fire protection zones.
Beyond general standards, our team created the detailed Parkway & Median Master Plan, which provides specific planting themes and material palettes for major corridors like De Anza and Potter Road. This plan introduced waterwise strategies—such as the use of inert groundcovers and the restriction of turf in medians—well ahead of modern conservation mandates. By establishing clear requirements for street tree box sizes and wall materials, we provided the City with a durable roadmap for its public infrastructure.
This deep historical knowledge of San Jacinto’s existing guidelines gives us a significant head start in streamlining these documents into a modern, userfriendly comprehensive manual.
LANDSCAPE
DESIGN
GUIDELINES
RHA+CW INVOLVEMENT:
Stakeholder Outreach,
Document Development
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
CONTACT:
Tim Hults, City Manager
Prior to his 2017 retirement
Currently a Senior Associate at
The Collaborative
[email protected]
EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
10 The CWDG team, now doing business as RHA+CW, has teamed with Breen Design Group to prepare a Streetscape Master Plan to address median rehabilitation throughout the City of Carson. Our team is working with the City’s stakeholders to develop a comprehensive City-Wide median rehabilitation conceptual plan utilizing the City’s new branding and future development plans. As part of this exercise we are in the process of developing cost estimates and implementation plan.
Our team has since completed construction plans for four (4) linear miles of median improvements throughout the City. We are currently teamed with Mour Architects on city-wide facade improvements plans in preparation for the 2028 Olympics.
BEFORE (PHOTO) AFTER (RENDERING)
STREETSCAPE
MASTER PLAN
REHABILITATION
RHA+CW INVOLVEMENT:
Conceptual Design,
Photo Simulations,
Implementation Plan and
Cost Estimates
CONTACT:
Ian Holst
Associate Civil Engineer
(310) 952-1700 x 1822
[email protected]
CITY OF CARSON
BEFORE (PHOTO) AFTER (RENDERING)
EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
11 CWDG, now doing businees as RHA+CW, served as the primary consultant for the City of Laguna Beach Playground Master Plan, leading the comprehensive effort to evaluate and provide a long-term strategy for the City’s nine public playgrounds. CWDG’s role was multifaceted, encompassing project leadership, technical analysis, and extensive community engagement to ensure the final plan was both technically sound and reflective of the community’s vision.
As the lead consultant, CWDG was responsible for the overall management and delivery of the master plan. This began with meticulous on-site work, including detailed assessments of each playground’s existing conditions. This was outlined in a $3.14 CIP Prioritization Matrix as part of the Playground Master Plan Approval by City Council.
LAGUNA BEACH
PLAYGROUND
MASTER PLAN
RHA+CW INVOLVEMENT:
Community Outreach,
Conceptual Design,
Photo Simulations,
Master Plan & CIP Prioritization Matrix
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
CONTACT:
Frank Lopez
Assistant City Engineer
[email protected]
(949) 497-0741
EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
12 CWDG, now doing business as RHA+CW, has worked with the City of Highland since 1990 in various capacities and have highlighted a few of our favorite projects below:
• SR210 Community Identity (APWA Award) (Pictured Far Top) • Greenspot Iron Bridge Kiosk (Pictured Above Left)
• Natural Parkland Trail Improvements (Pictured Above Right) • Town Center Streetscape
• Boulder Avenue Streetscape
• Aurantia Park
• City Facility Turf Removal/ Xeriscape Project at City Facilities (including City Yard, Parks, Fire Stations)
• CASp Staff Training
• SB 1383 Mulch and Compost Utilization Study
• Autumn Chase Slope Stabilization (after 2010 Storms)
• Coordination with East Valley Water District, East Highlands Ranch Master HOA
ON-CALL
SERVICES
RHA+CW INVOLVEMENT:
Conceptual Design,
3D Modeling,
Construction Drawings,
Construction Administration
Plan Check & Inspections
CITY OF HIGHLAND
2023
American Public Works Association
Southern California Chapter
B.E.S.T. Winner
CONTACT:
Kim Stater, Assistant Community
Development Director
(909) 864-8732
[email protected]
Existing Information Sign
Existing Entry Sign
Natural Stone Steps
Shelton Trail
Scenic Arroyo
New Education Sign
EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
13 RHA, now doing business
as RHA+CW, served as a key
technical consultant, providing
critical expertise in park inventory
and facility assessment. Led by
Doug Grove, the firm performed detailed evaluations of Chino’s extensive park system, which includes over 25 named parks such as Central Park, Monte Vista Park, and the Nature Retreat Park. RHA’s role was instrumental in identifying life-cycle needs and infrastructure improvements across the city’s diverse recreational assets, ensuring that the master plan’s recommendations were grounded in a thorough understanding of existing physical conditions.
By integrating these technical assessments with community input, RHA helped establish a strategic roadmap for the sustainable development and maintenance of Chino’s public spaces for the five-year planning period.
PARKS & FACILITIES
MASTER PLAN
NEW DEVELOPMENT
RHA+CW INVOLVEMENT:
Community &
Stakeholder Outreach,
Conceptual Design,
Photo Simulations,
Plan Development
CONTACT:
Sylvia Avalos, Director
Community Services, Parks & Recreation
(909) 334-3434
[email protected]
CITY OF CHINO
EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
14 BELLEGRAVE AVENUE & SUMNER AVENUE
ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN JULY 31, 2025
Landscape Enlargement
OPTION 1
The new entry monument landscape will feature boulders and lush shrub and groundcover plantings from species approved in the 2024 Eastvale Landscape Maintenance Manual. Trees, shrubs and groundcover will screen the existing wall as well as provide year-round visual interest. Shade Trees Accents & Groundcover Screening Plants CWDG, now doing business as RHA+CW, has served the City of Eastvale as a landscape architect consultant over the last decade and a half, since becoming a City. Scott Rice served as Landscape Architect for a wide variety of City contracts, including nearly all parks and trails within the City boundaries and even their Community Center. Featured above from Top Left clockwise: Entryway to Eastvale’s Community Park and Sports Fields - Phase 1, 2.5 mile segment of Santa Ana River Trail, Bellegrave and Sumner City Entry Monument, and City of Eastvale Community Center.
In addition to our extensive landscape architectural work, our team most recently, serves as On-Call Plan Check and Inspection Services for their LMDD. Services provided by Dan Burkhart currently include, landscape maintenance inspection of their CFD, City tree inspection, City property damage documentation, landscape mapping, plan check and more.
ON-CALL
SERVICES
NEW DEVELOPMENT
RHA+CW INVOLVEMENT:
Conceptual Design,
3D Modeling,
Construction Drawings,
Construction Administration
Plan Check & Inspections
CITY OF EASTVALE
CONTACT:
Yu Rhi Choi, Associate Engineer
951-361-0900
[email protected]
EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
15 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING
RHA+CW confirms that key personnel identified in the Organizational Chart identified below will remain during the term of the agreement. In the event there are proposed changes during the term of the agreement we will develop a transition plan for the City’s approval. We are also happy to work with any other On-Call subconsultants already contracted with the City of San Jacinto. Managing Partners, Doug Grove and Scott Rice, will serve as the main points-of-contact for the City of San Jacinto and Project Managers will be rotated in based on the needs of each task.
DIRECT PROJECT SUPPORT STAFF
David Black, PLA, Associate Principal Landscape Architect Jennifer Salazar, Associate
Brian Espinoza, Spanish Language Engagement Specialist
Jocelyn Aguirre, Landscape Designer
Arielle Talley, Landsape Designer, GIS Specialist
Savannah Baca, Landscape Designer/Community Outreach Assistant Marissa Trout, Office Manager
ANALICIA ESCOBAR-GOMEZ
MPA, CPRP
Director of Community Engagement
SCOTT RICE
ASLA, PLA, LEED AP, CASp
Managing Partner/
Principal Landscape Architect
DAN BURKHART
ASLA, ISA, sUAS
Associate Principal Landscape Architect
ALLISON RUSH
ASLA, CASp, CPSI Associate Principal Landscape Architect
GREG MEEK
PLA, CPSI
Principal Landscape Architect
Civil/Survey
Electrical
ANDREW LYTLE
PLA
Senior Project Manager
LAUREN MCHUGH
PLA
Associate Principal Landscape Architect
MIKE SALAZAR
PLA, CLIA
Senior Project Manager
DOUG GROVE
ASLA, PLA, LEED AP, CASp
Managing Partner/Principal Landscape Architect
Rebecca Rice, Executive Assistant/Accounts Payable
Luke Morris, PLA, Native Plant Specialist
Andres Virata, PLA, ASLA, Landscape Architect & Production Manager PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
16 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING
RHA+CW’S CURRENT TEAM OFFERS OVER 200 YEARS OF COMBINED PARK PLANNING EXPERIENCE IN ADDITION TO THE SPECIALTIES BELOW:
YEARS OF SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE
0 50
100
150
200
250
Certi ed Access Specialist
ISA Arborist
Certi ed Irrigation Designer
Contract Plan Check
Public Sector/Embedded Service Roles
Licensed Landscape Architects(12)
(4)
(1)
(3)
(1)
(2)
0 50
100
150
200
250
Certi ed Access Specialist
ISA Arborist
Certi ed Irrigation Designer
Contract Plan Check
Public Sector/Embedded Service Roles
Licensed Landscape Architects(12)
(4)
(1)
(3)
(1)
(2)
YOUR COMMITTED TEAM LEADERSHIP TEAM
Doug Grove, LLA #2799 ASLA, LEED AP
Managing Partner - Principal Landscape Architect
Doug Grove is uniquely qualified to lead this contract as he currently oversees the City of San Jacinto’s Parks and Open-Space Master Plan, providing him with an unmatched institutional understanding of the City’s specific goals, community needs, and existing infrastructure.
With over four decades of experience and a former presidency of the California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS), he offers a “concept-to-completion” leadership style that ensures every on-call project aligns seamlessly with San Jacinto’s long-term strategic vision. His deeprooted familiarity with the City’s regulatory landscape and stakeholder priorities allows RHA Community Works to deliver highly efficient, technically sound designs that are ready for immediate implementation.
Scott Rice, LLA #5111 ASLA, LEED AP, CASp
Managing Partner - Principal Landscape Architect
With over 25 years of experience in public works projects, Mr. Rice provides executive oversight and high-level quality assurance for all CWDG municipal projects. His certification as a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) is a critical asset for the City of San Jacinto, as the RFP specifically requires all documents to be reviewed for ADA compliance. Mr. Rice will ensure that every design submittal meets the most stringent federal and state accessibility standards.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
17 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING
Greg Meek, LLA #2484 CPSI - Principal Landscape Architect Greg brings over 45 years of professional experience, including over a decade as a park development coordinator and senior landscape architect for major California municipalities, providing him with a sophisticated understanding of capital improvement budgeting, professional service agreements, and the internal operations of public agencies.
YOUR COMMITTED TEAM OF EXPERTS
Allison Rush, LLA #6378 CASp, CPSI - Associate Principal Landscape Architect As a Licensed Landscape Architect and Director Of Design + Creativity with over 13 years of experience, Allison provides a dual layer of technical oversight as both a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) and a Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI). She oversees all graphics and overall cohesion for plans and graphics for the firm.
Dan Burkhart, LLA #6092 ASLA, ISA, sUAS - Associate Principal Landscape Architect As the Director of Implementation and Value, Dan provides an “insider” perspective rooted in his previous service as a Senior Landscape Inspector. His diverse technical toolkit as a Licensed Landscape Architect, ISA Certified Arborist, and FAA Licensed Drone Pilot allows him to oversee project implementation with a unique focus on budget-conscious asset management.
Lauren McHugh, LLA #5578 - Associate Principal Landscape Architect As a Project Manager and Associate Principal with RHA Community Works, Ms. McHugh brings over 19 years of dedicated experience to the firm, managing projects from preliminary design through construction documentation. She has specialized in diverse assignments including streetscapes, and worked on the San Jacinto Park and Recreation Master Plan for the City of San Jacinto.
Andrew Lytle, LLA #7165 Senior Project Manager/Landscape Architect With over a decade of experience, Andrew brings a high level of technical proficiency in 3D visualization and the design of complex public infrastructure, including parks, schools, and trail systems. His expertise spans the full project lifecycle, from initial conceptual rendering and budget management to the rigorous navigation of permitting and construction-phase oversight.
Mike Salazar, LLA #5166 CLIA - Senior Project Manager/Landscape Architect With over 20 years of experience, Mike specializes in bridging the gap between innovative design and the technical requirements of large-scale capital improvement programs. As a LEED Accredited Professional and Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor, he brings a rigorous focus on sustainability and operational efficiency to the firm.
Analicia Escobar-Gomez MPA, CPRP - Director Of Community Engagement Analicia provides a multifaceted perspective to the team, drawing on her diverse background as a designer and public sector planner to develop highly implementable solutions for municipal clients.
With nearly a decade of park planning experience, she specializes in equity-driven, communitybased design and has successfully led recent outreach campaigns for numerous California cities.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
18 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING: SUBCONSULTANTS
While the RHA Community Works team will perform the majority of the project scopes for the City of San Jacinto our team also includes the following subconsultants if required to consult for their expertise:
Design West Engineering (DWE) can provide all Electrical Engineering and Dry Utility design/ coordination services for City projects. We (RHA+CW) have teamed with DWE on many successful park projects across Southern California. We plan to utilize their expertise for lighting and security standards.
PBLA Engineering, Inc. (PBLA) is a multi-disciplinary firm that offers a robust suite of professional design services, including civil engineering, planning, and landscape architecture, making them a versatile partner for municipal services. Their expertise in site development includes critical services such as precise grading and drainage design, hydrologic and hydraulic studies, and Digital Terrain Modeling, which ensure that the creative vision of a landscape architect is grounded in functional, buildable reality. PBLA is particularly adept at navigating the complexities of municipal infrastructure, providing essential support in Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP), NPDES compliance, and dry utility coordination. By bridging the gap between innovative landscape design and rigorous engineering standards, PBLA ensures that the design standards for the City of San Jacinto are not only aesthetically impactful but also structurally sound, sustainable, and fully compliant with state and local regulations.
Years of Collaboration: 2010-Current (15+ Years)
Years of Collaboration: 2000 - Current (25+ Years)
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
19 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING: KEY RESUMES
Mr. Grove serves as the Managing Partner and Principal Landscape Architect of RHA Community Works (RHA+CW), where he leverages over four decades of technical expertise and executive leadership. A 1985 graduate of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, with a Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture, Mr. Grove has dedicated his career to the stewardship of public and private land, specializing in the intersection of community functionality and aesthetic design.
Throughout his tenure, Mr. Grove has become a definitive voice in the public works sector. His portfolio includes the successful design and project management of hundreds of park projects, alongside a diverse array of streetscapes, institutional facilities, and commercial environments. Beyond public infrastructure, he is highly regarded within the home-building industry for his strategic oversight of residential developments. This dual expertise allows him to navigate the unique requirements of both public and private stakeholders with a rare level of fluency.
Mr. Grove’s approach is defined by a comprehensive, “concept-tocompletion” philosophy. He is known for his ability to guide complex multidisciplinary teams through every phase of project development. This includes initial site planning and conceptual design, the rigorous production of construction documents, and the critical phase of construction observation. A key hallmark of his leadership is his proficiency in the regulatory arena; he is adept at coordinating public outreach, leading community meetings, and navigating the nuances of agency approvals to ensure that final drawings translate into seamless project delivery.
His commitment to the profession extends far beyond the studio. Mr. Grove is a prominent figure in the California landscape and recreation community, having served as the 2023–2024 State Board President for the California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS). His leadership within the organization also includes a past presidency of the CPRS State Development and Operations Section. Currently, he serves as the President of the Building Industry Association (BIA) for Riverside County, reflecting his deep-rooted influence in regional development.
Representative projects include (partial list):
• Landscape Design Guidelines, City of San Jacinto
• Parks and Recreation Master Plan, City of San Jacinto • Victoria Avenue Beautification Plan, City of Riverside • Parks & Facilities Master Plan, City of Chino
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Science in
Landscape Architecture
California State Polytechnic University,
Pomona (1985)
Years of Experience: 40+
Years with Firm: 32
LICENSES + CERTIFICATES:
Licensed Landscape Architect
California #2799 (1987-current)
LEED Accredited Professional
United States Green Building Council (USGBC)
AFFILIATIONS:
Building Industry Association
of Southern California (BIASC)
Board of Directors/ Executive Committee
Riverside County Chapter
President (2024-present)
Vice President (2023-2024)
Secretary (2022-2023)
Board Member (2018-present)
Building California Park & Recreation Society
(CPRS)
CPRS Administrators Section
Director of Fundraising (2024-present)
President (2023-2024)
President Elect (2022-2023)
Vice President (2021-2022)
DOUG GROVE ASLA, PLA, LEED AP
MANAGING PARTNER / PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
20 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING: KEY RESUMES
Mr. Scott Rice is President and Managing Principal of Community Works Design Group (CWDG). He has managed over $150 million of park projects during his tenure at CWDG. Scott oversees the development of construction documents, plan checking, cost estimating, conceptual rendering, and construction observation and management.
Scott graduated with honors from Cal Poly Pomona, earning a Bachelor of Science Degree in Landscape Architecture. He is a full member of the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA). Additionally, Scott is a LEED Accredited Professional (LEED AP), as designated by the United States Green Building Council (USGBC), and a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) as issued by the State of California, Division of the State Architect. Scott is one of only three Landscape Architects in California that currently hold CASp Certification.
Scott also serves as the City Landscape Architect for the City of Highland, California, and has acted in that capacity since 2005. Scott also has served as a Consultant Park Planner/ Plan Checker for Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District (JARPD) since 2015.
Mr. Rice draws on previous work experience in graphic design and golf course maintenance to integrate high aesthetic quality in balance with functional, cost-effective design. His focus is in Public Works projects for various municipalities throughout the State, including Park Planning of various scales, including Community, Neighborhood, Sports, and Pocket Parks, as well as median and parkway landscape, and LMD/ CFD planning. Specialized areas of involvement include Skate Parks, Dog Parks, and Accessible Play. In addition to Park Planning, Scott is seasoned in the landscape architectural development of Multi-family Housing, Planned Residential Communities, Highway Aesthetic Design, Custom Residential Planning, and various private/commercial ventures.
Representative projects include (partial list):
• Carson Streetscape Master Plan, City of Carson
• Perris Landscape Design Guidelines, City of Perris
• Safer Streets Phases 1 & 2, City of Indian Wells
• Streetscape Master Plan, City of Carson
• Laguna Beach Playground Master Plan, City of Laguna Beach • City Landscape Architect, City of Highland (2005-Present) • Greenspot Iron Bridge Kiosk, City of Highland
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Science in
Landscape Architecture
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
(2002)
Years of Experience: 25
Years with Firm: 20+
LICENSES + CERTIFICATES:
Licensed Landscape Architect
California #5111 (2005-current)
New York #2645 (2016-current)
Certified Access Specialist
California CASp-709 (2016-current)
AFFILIATIONS:
American Society of Landscape Architects
(ASLA) / Southern California Chapter
Exec. Committee member (2021-present)
Chapter President (2024-2025)
County of San Bernardino
Building and Safety Appeals Board - Chairman
(2025-present)
Physically Disabled Access Appeals Board
Member (2019-present)
Building Industry Association of Southern California
Board of Directors
San Bernardino County Chapter Board Member
(2025-present)
Riverside County Chapter Board Member
(2021-2025)
Leaders of Tomorrow Committee - Chairman (2017)
Certified Access Specialist Institute
Full Member (2016-present)
SCOTT RICE ASLA, PLA, LEED AP, CASp
MANAGING PARTNER /PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
21 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING: KEY RESUMES
Mr. Greg Meek is a Principal Landscape Architect at RHA Community Works with over 47 years of extensive experience in both the public and private sectors. A graduate of Texas A&M University and a licensed professional since 1984, Greg offers a rare depth of institutional knowledge, including a notable three-year tenure as the Senior Landscape Architect for the City of San Jose. His career is defined by a mastery of public works administration, having spent a decade as a park development coordinator for various California municipalities. This background allows him to expertly navigate the complexities of agency capital budgets, the management of Park Impact fees, and the strategic planning of Capital Improvement Programs (CIP) for high-stakes infrastructure projects.
Greg’s specialized expertise is particularly valuable for large-scale turf reduction and water conservation contracts. His experience as a consultant plan checker for cities such as Jurupa Valley, Rialto, and Diamond Bar ensures that all design documents undergo a rigorous internal review for technical accuracy and regulatory alignment. He is highly proficient in developing requests for services, negotiating fees, and managing multidisciplinary teams to ensure that public projects—ranging from regional sports complexes to municipal streetscapes—are delivered with fiscal transparency and strict adherence to AB 1572 and MWELO mandates.
In addition to his administrative and design leadership, Greg is a Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI), reflecting a career-long commitment to public safety and accessible design. His professional toolkit is further enhanced by advanced training in performance leadership and negotiation dynamics, skills he utilizes to facilitate consensus among stakeholders and governing agencies. Whether overseeing the modernization of a neighborhood park or coordinating complex facility improvements, Greg ensures that every RHA initiative is grounded in nearly five decades of technical excellence and a deep understanding of the unique operational requirements of California’s public districts.
Representative projects include (partial list):
• Mead Valley Library (LEED Silver), County of Riverside • Casmalia and Alder Street Beautification, City of Rialto • Mission Boulevard Revitalization, Riverside County EDA Washington Park Play Area, City of El Segundo, California
• Jurupa Valley Planning Department Plan Checking, City of Jurupa Valley, • Lake Cunningham Bike Park/ Extreme Sports Park, San Jose, California • Grand Terrace Fitness Park, Grand Terrace, California EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Arts in Landscape Architecture
California Texas A&M University (1979)
Performance Leadership
DunkinWorks (2016)
Resolve - Negotiations training
Agreement Dynamics Inc. 2017
Years of Experience: 47+
LICENSES + CERTIFICATES:
Licensed Landscape Architect
California #2484 (1984-current)
Certified Playground Safety Inspector
GREG MEEK PLA, CPSI
PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
22 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING: KEY RESUMES
ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Mr. Dan Burkhart is an Associate Landscape Architect at RHA Community Works, where he directs the firm’s construction development and documentation processes with a focus on large-scale public works projects. With over 24 years of cross-disciplinary experience, Dan oversees technical plan checking, internal quality control, and comprehensive construction oversight. His professional journey, from early roles in municipal parks departments to serving as a General Superintendent for habitat restoration and mitigation, provides him with a unique “boots-on-the-ground” perspective that ensures designs are not only visionary but technically executable and maintainable.
As a specialist in sustainable infrastructure and public-sector contracts, Dan previously served as the Senior Landscape Inspector for the City of Yorba Linda. In this capacity, he managed extensive landscape maintenance assessment districts (LMAD), overseeing 500 acres of municipal landscape and a 22,000-tree urban forest. This experience on the agency side of the table is invaluable for turf reduction initiatives, as it allows him to anticipate the long-term operational needs of public districts while ensuring strict adherence to project specifications and water-efficiency mandates.
Dan holds a Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture from Cal Poly Pomona and maintains an elite technical toolkit, including certifications as a Licensed Contractor, Certified Arborist, FAA UAS Drone Pilot, and Qualified Applicator (QAL). Known as the “Coach” within the office, he is dedicated to mentoring staff and optimizing production efficiency to meet demanding project schedules. His diverse background in both designbuild and municipal inspection makes him a key asset in delivering highperformance, AB 1572-compliant landscapes that stand up to the rigors of public use and maintenance.
Representative projects include (partial list):
• Carson Streetscape Master Plan, City of Carson
• Perris Landscape Design Guidelines, City of Perris
• Public Turf Conversion, City of Jurupa Valley
• Colton Median and Streetscape, City of Colton
• 5th Street Widening, City of Temecula
• Natural Parkland Trail, City of Highland
• 3rd and 5th Street Improvements, City of Highland
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Science in
Landscape Architecture
California State Polytechnic University,
Pomona (2001)
Years of Experience: 25
Years with Firm: 5
LICENSES + CERTIFICATES:
Licensed Landscape Architect
California #6092 (2015-current)
ISA Certified Arborist
WE-11637A (2016-current)
FAA UAS Remote Pilot
(2017-current)
California Department of
Pesticide Regulation - QAL
122282 BF (2010-current)
AFFILIATIONS:
American Society of Landscape Architects
(ASLA)
Full Member
International Society of Arboriculture (ISA)
Full Member
DANIEL BURKHART ASLA, PLA, ISA
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
23 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING: KEY RESUMES
Mrs. Allison Rush is an Associate Principal Landscape Architect at RHA Community Works, specializing in the optimization of public spaces and the technical delivery of water-resilient infrastructure. With a Master of Landscape Architecture and a background in Architectural History, Allison excels at configuring environments that promote community health while meeting modern sustainability mandates. Her expertise is central to the firm’s ability to transform underutilized areas into high-functioning, AB 1572-compliant landscapes that balance user experience with resource conservation.
With over a decade of experience in the California landscape industry, Allison has developed a sophisticated mastery of digital media and CADbased production. She leverages advanced AutoCAD workflows, 3D modeling, and photo simulations to translate complex design guidelines into precise, constructible documents. These tools are critical in the public works sector, providing Districts with realistic visualizations of turf reduction and irrigation retrofits while ensuring that site grading and drainage plans align perfectly with local municipal standards and state water ordinances.
As a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) and Playground Safety Inspector, Allison ensures that every project exceeds universal design standards and safety requirements. Her technical fluency allows her to lead multidisciplinary teams through the intricacies of playground design and irrigation modernization, bridging the gap between creative intent and strict regulatory adherence. By maintaining a rigorous standard for construction documentation, she ensures that the firm’s designs are not only visionary but technically sound and ready for seamless field implementation.
Representative projects include (partial list):
• Carson Streetscape Master Plan, City of Carson
• Perris Landscape Design Guidelines, City of Perris
• Safer Streets Phases 1 & 2, City of Indian Wells
• Playground Master Plan, City of Laguna Beach
• Weston Park Redesign, City of Hemet
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Arts in
Human Geography,
The Pennsylvania State University (2010)
Master of Landscape Architecture, Temple
University (2013)
Years of Experience: 13+
Years with Firm: 10+
LICENSES + CERTIFICATES:
Licensed Landscape Architect:
California #6378 (2018-current)
Certified Access Specialist:
California CASp-1080 (2023-current)
Certified Playground Safety Inspector
California (2023-current)
AFFILIATIONS:
American Society of Landscape Architects
(ASLA)
Full Member
Certified Access Specialist Institute
Full Member
ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
ALLISON RUSH PLA, CASp, CPSI
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
24 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING: KEY RESUMES
With nearly two decades of experience at RHA Community Works, Ms. McHugh has cultivated a specialized expertise in navigating the complexities of public-sector landscape architecture. As both an Associate Principal and Project Manager, she bridges the gap between high-level community planning and the technical rigor required for constructionready documentation. Her career is defined by a versatile portfolio that transforms utilitarian infrastructure—such as roadway improvements and hospital grounds—into vibrant, functional environments. By overseeing projects from their earliest preliminary phases through to final construction, she ensures that the original design vision remains intact while meeting strict municipal standards and budgetary requirements.
Beyond her management capabilities, Ms. McHugh is a highly skilled practitioner of computer-aided graphic design, using advanced digital tools to bring conceptual landscapes to life for stakeholders and community members. Her work on large-scale regional parks and intricate pedestrian trail systems reflects a deep commitment to accessibility and ecological integration. Having earned her Bachelor of Science from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, she applies a “learn by doing” philosophy to every assignment, ensuring that neighborhood parks and urban streetscapes are not only aesthetically pleasing but also resilient and sustainable. Her long-standing licensure and leadership within the firm serve as a testament to her dedication to the profession and the communities she serves.
Representative projects include:
• San Jacinto Park and Recreation Master Plan, City of San Jacinto • Temple City Parks and Open Space Master Plan, City of Temple City • Carlsbad Needs Assessment and Comprehensive Action Plan, City of Carlsbad
• Ladera Ranch Needs Assessment/Park and Recreation Master Plan, Ladera Ranch
• Orange Blossom Trail – Phase 1, City of Redlands
• Orange Blossom Trail – Phase 2, City of Redlands
• Arroyo Seco Pedestrian and Bicycle Trail, City of South Pasadena • Gilman Ranch, RivCo Parks
• Celebration Park, City of Ontario
• Fergusson Park, City of Rialto
• Rancho Jurupa Regional Sports Complex, Riverside County EDA • Rancho Jurupa Park – RV Park, Water Play & Miniature Golf, County of Riverside
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Arts in Landscape Architecture
California Texas A&M University (2006)
Years of Experience: 19+
Years with Firm: 19+
LICENSES + CERTIFICATES:
Licensed Landscape Architect
California #5578 (2009-current)
LAUREN MCHUGH PLA
ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC T
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
25 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
A Proven Partnership for a Visionary Future
RHA Community Works has a long-standing history with the City of San Jacinto, dating back to 2005 when we authored the City’s original Landscape Design Guidelines and the Parkway & Median Master Plan. Our foundational work established the framework for the City’s visual character and technical standards, covering everything from project-specific design criteria for residential front yards and commercial developments to specialized
sections on slope stabilization and fire protection zones. We also developed the comprehensive technical manual that governs plan submittals and review processes, ensuring a consistent and high-quality aesthetic across all municipal improvements. This deep historical knowledge of San Jacinto’s existing guidelines gives us a significant head start in streamlining these documents into a modern, user-friendly comprehensive manual.
Since those initial projects, our firm has strategically merged with Community Works Design Group, significantly expanding our capacity and creative reach. This merger brings a wealth of additional experience from high-profile municipal projects, such as the development of the Playground Master Plan for the City of Laguna Beach and the Streetscape Master Plan for the City of Carson. By blending our intimate local knowledge of San Jacinto with our firm’s broader expertise in stakeholder outreach and inclusive design, we are uniquely prepared to help the City refresh and simplify its various technical documents. Our goal is to consolidate these plans into a single, cohesive Comprehensive Guidance manual that serves as a functional tool for city staff, developers, and residents alike.
The continuity of our leadership is a primary asset for this undertaking. Our Principal Landscape Architect, Doug Grove, spearheaded the original Landscape Design Guideline process as well as the City’s initial Park & Recreation Master Plan. His direct involvement ensures that the upcoming updates are built upon a solid understanding of the City’s original intent while being expertly adapted for 21st-century needs. This “institutional memory” allows our team to bypass the typical learning curve associated with new consultants, positioning us to meet an ambitious 6–9 month completion timeframe without sacrificing the depth or quality of the final product.
Over the past 20 years, we have built on that foundation by master planning for dozens of surrounding communities and regional agencies—including the Cities of Chino, Riverside, San Clemente, and the Rim of the World Recreation and Park District. We are eager to bring this updated experience back to San Jacinto. With a talented team of 20 professional staff, we have the resources to transform dense technical data into a vibrant, graphic-heavy document. Our approach focuses on clarity and accessibility, utilizing easy-to-navigate tables, matrices, and highly visual prototypes to ensure that the City’s vision is not only preserved but clearly communicated for decades to come.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
26 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
Task 1: Project Initiation & Review
Success in the development of Citywide Landscape, Park, and Irrigation Design Standards begins with a shared vision and a rigorous audit of the City’s existing regulatory framework. RHA Community Works views Task 1 not merely as an administrative startup, but as the foundational phase where the project’s strategic alignment is secured.
Our team will initiate the project with a Formal Kickoff Meeting involving key City stakeholders from Public Works, Planning, and Community Development. The primary objective is to establish clear lines of communication, confirm the project schedule, and define the “Success Indicators” for the final manual. During this session, we will finalize the list of “Stakeholder Technical Experts” who will provide departmental oversight throughout the process.
Following the kickoff, our team will conduct a Comprehensive Document Audit. We will perform a “deep-dive” review of the following documents to identify “friction points” where current standards may inadvertently hinder the goals of the San Jacinto General Plan 2040:
• San Jacinto General Plan 2040: Ensuring the new standards facilitate the Land Use and Resource Management goals.
• San Jacinto Trails Master Plan: Aligning parkway and street tree standards with established trail connectivity goals.
• Housing Element & 2021-2029 Mandates: Identifying how landscape standards can support densification without sacrificing aesthetic or environmental quality. • Existing Municipal Codes & Engineering Standards: Flagging outdated specifications that create maintenance burdens or conflict with modern irrigation technology.
This phase concludes with a Project Review Memorandum, which summarizes our findings and outlines the specific areas where current standards are most deficient or inconsistent. This memo serves as the roadmap for the technical updates in subsequent tasks.
Methodology Highlights
• Conflict Resolution: Identifying where Engineering requirements (e.g., utility clearances) and Landscape requirements (e.g., shade tree canopy) are at odds. • Policy Mapping: Linking every proposed standard back to a specific goal in the General Plan 2040 to ensure legal and planning defensibility.
• Communication Protocol: Establishing a project-specific portal for the seamless exchange of CAD files, GIS data, and draft documents.
Relevant Experience
City of San Jacinto Park & Recreation Master Plan and Landscape Design Guidelines Having previously developed the City’s Park & Recreation Master Plan and Landscape Design Guidelines, RHA Community Works possesses an unparalleled “head start.” We are already intimately familiar with San Jacinto’s park inventory and community demographics. This historical knowledge allows us to move through Task 1 with greater speed and precision than any other firm, as we are building upon a foundation we helped create.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
27 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
Task 2: Gap Analysis & Internal Consistency
A primary challenge in municipal development is the “silo effect,” where standards authored by different departments—though well-intentioned—create practical conflicts in the field. Task 2 is a rigorous technical audit designed to eliminate these contradictions before they reach the drafting phase. RHA Community Works will conduct a cross-functional analysis of San Jacinto’s landscape requirements against the standards of the Public Works, Planning, and Utilities Departments.
Our team will facilitate a series of Internal Stakeholder Work Sessions to map out existing regulatory overlaps. We will focus specifically on “Competing Right-of-Way Needs.” For example, we will ensure that a Planning requirement for a specific street tree canopy size does not interfere with Public Works’ line-of-sight safety mandates or Utility Department clearances for overhead power lines and underground water mains. By identifying these “Gap Areas” early, we prevent the need for costly field revisions or variance requests during the private development review process.
The deliverable for this task will be an Internal Consistency Matrix. This document will list every current landscape-related mandate and flag conflicting language found in the Municipal Code, Standard Drawings, or General Plan policies. This matrix ensures that the updated Landscape and Irrigation Design Standards manual becomes the “Single Source of Truth” for the City, providing developers and staff with a clear, unified path to project approval.
Methodology Highlights
• Regulatory Cross-Reference: Auditing the City’s Engineering Standard Drawings to ensure that planting setbacks are compatible with utility trenching details. • Feasibility Testing: Verifying that required parkway widths can actually accommodate the specified tree root balls and irrigation lateral lines without compromising sidewalk integrity. • Enforcement Streamlining: Updating “Conditions of Approval” language to ensure it is consistent across all departments, reducing the administrative burden on City Planning staff during the entitlement process.
Relevant Experience
City of Chino Parks & Facilities Master Plan
During our work for the City of Chino, RHA Community Works faced a complex regulatory environment involving multiple overlapping master plans and municipal codes. Our team led a multi-departmental effort to streamline these requirements into a cohesive set of development standards. By acting as the bridge between the Parks and Public Works departments, we eliminated redundant requirements and created a unified “Amenities Menu” that simplified the development of over 100 acres of parkland, including the regionally significant Ruben S.
Ayala Park.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
28 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
Task 3: Park Classifications & Amenity Standards
A cohesive park system requires a clear organizational hierarchy to ensure that diverse community needs are met efficiently across the City’s geographic footprint. RHA Community Works will develop a Park Classification Framework that categorizes San Jacinto’s outdoor assets into distinct tiers, such as Pocket Parks, Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks, and Regional Sports Complexes. Each classification will be defined by specific acreage targets, service area radiuses, and intended user demographics, providing the City with a data-driven tool for future land acquisition and development.
Once the hierarchy is established, our team will define “Signature Amenity Standards” for each class.
This ensures a baseline of quality and “equitable distribution” of essential features across all wards of the City. We will move beyond basic requirements to incorporate modern community priorities, establishing standards for:
• Inclusive Play Environments: Moving beyond basic ADA compliance to “Universal Design” that encourages play for children of all abilities.
• Climate Resilience: Mandating shade structures, “cool” surfacing, and integrated hydration stations as standard components for every park tier.
• Technology Integration: Standards for smart lighting, Wi-Fi zones, and security infrastructure.
The final deliverable for this task will be an Amenity Matrix included in the manual. This matrix will act as a “Developer’s Playbook,” clearly stating which amenities are mandatory, which are preferred, and which are prohibited for each park type. This level of clarity reduces the “back-and-forth” during the design review process and ensures that new developments contribute meaningfully to the City’s overall recreational fabric.
Methodology Highlights
• Tiered Programming: Establishing “minimum viable programming” for small infill lots to ensure they offer high-value recreation despite space constraints. • Service Radius Mapping: Using the hierarchy to identify “park deserts” where future Neighborhood Parks should be prioritized.
• Maintenance-First Design: Specifying standardized materials and finishes (e.g., specific anti- graffiti coatings or playground surfacing) across all classifications to streamline the City’s long-term maintenance inventory.
Relevant Experience
RHA Community Works is currently spearheading the City of Upland’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan, creating a visionary “roadmap” to modernize aging park infrastructure and equitably expand recreational access for a growing community. By integrating data-driven analysis with robust public engagement, the firm developed a strategic framework that balances the preservation of Upland’s local character with innovative standards for climate resilience and inclusive play.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
29 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
To move San Jacinto toward a more cohesive and sustainable park system, RHA+CW will implement a comprehensive classification framework. This system will move beyond simple acreage counts to define the functional role of every space, ensuring that future developer contributions and City investments are strategically aligned.
1. Park Classification Framework
We will categorize all existing and future City assets into a four-tiered hierarchy. This allows the City to set specific standards for maintenance, equipment quality, and service radius:
2. Standards for Inclusive Play
RHA+CW goes beyond basic ADA compliance to embrace Universal Design. Our standards will mandate that San Jacinto’s play areas are “multi-generational” and “multi-ability.” In addition to our two (2) in-house Certified Access Specialists (CASp), we also offer two (2) in-house Certifed Playground Safety Inspectors (CPSI), giving our team a strong edge for Inclusive Play Design Standards.
3. Climate Resilience and Sustainable Infrastructure
Given the San Jacinto Valley’s heat and water constraints, resilience is a technical necessity.
4. Smart Park Technology
We will future-proof San Jacinto’s parks by integrating standards for “Smart” infrastructure that improves safety and operations.
Sample Park Classification Matrix shown below:
S E C T I O N 0 3 · P A R K & S T R E E T T R E E S T A N D A R D S D E V E L O P E R R E Q U I R E M E N T S · C A P I TA L P L A N N I N G
A M E N I T Y F R A M E W O R K
3.3 Park Amenity & Service Matrix
This matrix serves as the City's definitive guide for developer requirements and capital improvement planning — establishing the minimum amenity, service, and sustainability thresholds for each park tier within the San Jacinto system.
S T A N D A R D
Feature / Amenity
P
Pocket Park
N
Neighborhood Park
C
Community Park
Inclusive Playground Small Nodes
Intimate play elements
Full Primary Structure
ADA-compliant, mixed ages
Destination / Themed
Signature regional draw
Shade Coverage 50% of seating areas
30% of total park area40% of total park area
Sports Facilities — Not Applicable — Multi-Use Court
Basketball / pickleball
Specialized Complexes
League-grade fields & courts
Restroom Facilities — Not Applicable — Optional / Standard Pre-cast concrete units
Mandatory / Enhanced
Year-round, family-style
Smart Technology
Lighting Only
LED dusk-to-dawn
Wi-Fi + Smart Irrigation
Public access & ET control
Full Sensor Suite
Usage, air, soil & water
Hydration Stations Standard Fountain
Single-bubbler unit
Bottle Filler
Fountain + refill spout
High-Capacity / Pet-Friendly
Bubbler, filler & dog bowl
Native Planting 100% Fully native palette
70% 30% active turf allowance80% 20% active turf allowance
R E A D I N G T H E M A T R I X
Each row defines the minimum standard by tier.
Developers may exceed these thresholds with City
approval.
P E R C E N T A G E B A S I S
Shade and native-planting percentages are calculated
against the measurable area defined for each tier.
E N F O R C E M E N T
Compliance is verified at the design-review phase and
confirmed before acceptance into City maintenance
inventory.
C I T Y O F S A N J A C I N T O | D E S I G N S TA N D A R D S M A N U A L § 3 . 3 PA R K A M E N I T Y M AT R I X
T I E R I
Under 1 Acre
T I E R I I
1 – 5 Acres
T I E R I I I
10+ Acres
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
30 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
Task 4: Park Amenity Design and Equipment Standards
Traditional park requirements often rely on rigid, acreage-to-population ratios that can be difficult to implement on irregularly shaped or smaller infill development sites. To address this, RHA Community Works will develop a “Points-Based Amenity Menu” designed to prioritize qualitative community impact over quantitative land area alone. This system provides developers with the flexibility to meet City requirements through a diverse combination of high-value amenities that reflect the actual recreational needs of San Jacinto’s residents.
Under this system, different park features, such as fitness stations, public art installations, shade structures, or multi-use trail connections, are assigned a “point value” based on their cost, maintenance intensity, and community demand. A developer might choose to provide a smaller physical park space that is “highly activated” with high-point amenities like a splash pad or inclusive playground, rather than a larger, passive open space with lower recreational utility. This “Value Scoring” approach ensures that even as the City densifies, the recreational opportunities available to residents remain high-quality and varied.
The final deliverable for this task will be a Scoring Worksheet included in the manual. This tool will allow City Planning staff to quickly evaluate a developer’s proposal, ensuring it meets the minimum threshold of “Recreational Value Points” before project approval. It transforms the negotiation process between the City and developers into a clear, transparent, and objective exercise.
Methodology Highlights
• Amenity Weighting: Collaborating with City staff to assign points based on San Jacinto’s specific priorities (e.g., higher points for water-efficient features or shade). • Alternative Compliance: Creating a pathway for developers to fulfill recreational obligations through off-site trail improvements or contributions to regional park facilities when on-site options are limited.
• Future-Proofing: Designing the scoring system to be modular, allowing the City to update point values as community trends shift (e.g., adding points for pickleball courts or EV charging stations in park lots).
Relevant Experience
City of Carlsbad Needs Assessment and Action Plan
RHA Community Works utilized a sophisticated “Needs Assessment” logic for the City of Carlsbad that served as the precursor to a scoring system. We translated broad community desires into a quantifiable “Action Plan,” where specific recreational gaps were identified and weighted. By establishing a datadriven framework for what the community lacked, we enabled the City to direct developer contributions toward the most impactful projects. We will adapt this successful logic to create a San Jacinto-specific scoring menu that balances developer flexibility with guaranteed community benefit.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
31 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
S E C T I O N 0 3 · P A R K & S T R E E T T R E E S T A N D A R D S D E V E L O P E R R E Q U I R E M E N T S · C A P I TA L P L A N N I N G
V A L U A T I O N F R A M E W O R K
3.4 Amenity Valuation Matrix
This matrix assigns relative point values to park amenities across four functional categories, supporting equitable comparison of proposed improvements during development review, grant scoring, and capital prioritization.
C A T E G O R Y
Amenity Class
50–100 pts
High-Value Amenity
20–49 pts
Medium-Value Amenity
5–19 pts
Low-Value Amenity
Active Play
Passive / Social
Connectivity
Resilience
S C O R I N G B A S I S
Points reflect relative contribution to park program,
public benefit, and long-term value — not construction
cost alone.
C O M B I N I N G V A L U E S
Total park scores are summed across categories. A
balanced mix across all four rows is preferred over
concentration in one category.
R E V I E W A U T H O R I T Y
Final point assignments are confirmed by the Community
Development Director during design review, with
discretion to adjust within tier ranges.
C I T Y O F S A N J A C I N T O | D E S I G N S TA N D A R D S M A N U A L § 3 . 4 A M E N I T Y VA L U AT I O N M AT R I X
T I E R A
Signature / capital-intensive
T I E R B
Programmatic / flexible
T I E R C
Supporting / site furnishing
Inclusive Playground
Splash Pad
Half-Court Basketball
Fitness Station
Horseshoe Pit
Tetherball
Large Group Pavilion
Amphitheater
Individual Picnic Gazebo
Dog Park
Bench Seating
Trash Receptacles
Class I Multi-Use Trail Link Decomposed Granite Internal Path Basic Wayfinding Signage
Smart Irrigation / Solar Lighting Engineered Shade Structure Drought-Tolerant Tree Canopy Weston Park Redesign and Community Engagement
Through our recent work on the Weston Park Redesign in nearby Hemet, we have gained contemporary insights into the specific recreational preferences of Inland Empire residents. We understand the high value placed on shaded gathering spaces and safe, accessible play areas. This regional knowledge ensures that the “Point Values” we assign in the San Jacinto manual will accurately reflect the amenities that local families will actually use and cherish, rather than relying on generic national averages.
Sample Points-Based Amenity Menu shown below:
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
32 Task 5: Landscape Planting & Irrigation Design Standards In the arid climate of the San Jacinto Valley, landscape design must transcend aesthetics to become a functional tool for environmental resilience and resource conservation. RHA Community Works will develop a “San Jacinto Resilient” Planting Framework that prioritizes long-term survivability while enhancing the City’s visual character. Our approach centers on creating a diversified plant palette that is specifically adapted to the local microclimate, emphasizing low-water, fire-resistant, and non-invasive species.
A critical component of this task is the implementation of Hydro-zoning Standards. We will establish clear guidelines for grouping plants with similar water needs, ensuring that irrigation schedules are optimized and water waste is eliminated. Furthermore, our standards will address the “foundation” of landscape success:
Soil Health and Management. We will provide technical specifications for soil testing, organic amendments, and mulching practices that improve water retention and reduce the need for synthetic fertilizers. By focusing on the biological health of the landscape, we ensure that the City’s green infrastructure can withstand regional heatwaves and prolonged drought cycles.
The final deliverable will be an Approved Plant Palette and Design Guideline section, based on what has worked over the last 20 years from the original palette. This will include detailed “Instructional Guides” showing proper planting techniques, minimum spacing for maturity, and clear prohibited species lists to protect local biodiversity.
Methodology Highlights
• Climate-Specific Selection: Curating species that thrive in San Jacinto’s specific USDA Hardiness Zone and Sunset Climate Zone, with a focus on pollinators and native-friendly varieties. • Safety & Visibility Design: Integrating “Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design” (CPTED) principles to ensure planting heights and placements maintain clear sightlines for public safety. • MWELO Integration: Ensuring
every planting standard is prealigned with the California Model Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance to streamline the
documentation process for
developers.
Sample of an illustrated plant
palette developed for Riverside
County Office of Education shown
right.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
33 Task 5: Irrigation Design & Water Efficiency
In an era of increasing water scarcity and rigorous state mandates, irrigation design must be treated as a high-precision engineering discipline. RHA+CW will develop irrigation standards for San Jacinto that prioritize maximum efficiency, ease of maintenance, and full regulatory compliance. Our approach centers on the integration of “Smart” Irrigation Technology, moving the City away from static scheduling and toward dynamic, weather-based management. In addition to our in-house irrigation experts, David Black and Dan Burkhart, our team also has an in-house Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA)..
Our team will mandate the use of state-of-the-art components, including:
• Weather-Based Irrigation Controllers (WBIC): Utilizing real-time evapotranspiration (ET) data to adjust watering schedules automatically.
• Flow Sensing and Master Valves: Implementing systems that detect “catastrophic” leaks or line breaks and automatically shut down the water source to prevent waste and infrastructure damage. • High-Efficiency Delivery: Specifying pressure-regulating heads and multi-stream rotary nozzles that provide superior distribution uniformity and wind resistance.
A core deliverable of this task is ensuring that all technical specifications are 100% compliant with the California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). We will provide the City with standardized “Water Budgeting” templates and documentation protocols that simplify the submittal process for developers while ensuring the City remains in good standing with state water-use reporting requirements.
Methodology Highlights
• Subsurface Irrigation Standards: Establishing guidelines for the use of Netafim or similar dripline systems in narrow parkways and high- traffic areas to eliminate overspray and runoff.
• Central Control Compatibility: Ensuring all new irrigation hardware is compatible with the City’s existing or future central control software, allowing staff to manage citywide water use from a single interface.
• Maintenance-Centric Specs: Standardizing on specific, high- durability brands and models to reduce the variety of spare parts the City must stock in its maintenance inventory.
Relevant Experience
RHA+CW developed the comprehensive landscape design guidelines and technical manual for the City of Perris, which includes a detailed approved tree list and standardized irrigation design details.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
34 Task 6: Street Tree & Parkway Standards
Street trees and parkways are the most visible elements of a city’s “living infrastructure,” yet they are often the most difficult to maintain without clear, technically sound standards. RHA Community Works will update San Jacinto’s approved street tree list and parkway specifications using a “Right Tree, Right Place, Right Way” philosophy. Our objective is to maximize the environmental benefits of the urban forest, such as shade-driven heat-island mitigation and improved air quality, while aggressively minimizing future liabilities like sidewalk heave, root-related utility damage, and excessive pruning costs. In addition to our in-house ISA Arborist, we also have a Certified Native Plant Specialist to help guide this task.
Our team will develop standards that
account for the specific technical
constraints of San Jacinto’s diverse street
types. We will establish mandatory Root
Management Standards, specifying the
use of deep-root barriers and structural
soils where appropriate. Furthermore, we
will define “Canopy-Coverage Targets”
for different roadway classifications
(Major Arterials vs. Residential Collectors)
to ensure the City meets its long-term
sustainability goals.
The final deliverable will include a Street Tree Selection Matrix, which categorizes trees by their growth habit, water needs, and susceptibility to pests. We will also provide clear cross-sectional diagrams for parkway widths, ensuring that planting areas are correctly sized to support healthy mature growth without compromising the integrity of adjacent curb and gutter infrastructure.
Methodology Highlights
• Urban Heat Mitigation: Prioritizing high-canopy, drought-tolerant species for pedestrian-heavy corridors to create “cool routes” as identified in the General Plan 2040. • Maintenance-Friendly Specifications: Selecting species with high “litter resistance” and structural integrity to reduce the City’s annual street-sweeping and emergency pruning expenditures. •Trenching and Offset Standards: Establishing clear setback requirements for trees relative to streetlights, fire hydrants, and underground lateral lines to ensure long-term utility access.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
S E C T I O N 0 3 · P A R K & S T R E E T T R E E S T A N D A R D S D E V E L O P E R R E Q U I R E M E N T S · C A P I TA L P L A N N I N G
U R B A N F O R E S T R Y F R A M E W O R K
3.7 Street Tree Roadway Matrix
This matrix establishes minimum parkway, canopy, root management, and irrigation standards for street tree installations, matched to each roadway classification within the San Jacinto right-of-way. Standards scale with roadway intensity — arterials require the most robust tree infrastructure, while local residential streets prioritize scale compatibility and low-litter habit.
C L A S S I F I C AT I O N
Roadway
PA R K WAY C A N O P Y R O O T M A N A G E M E N T I R R I G AT I O N S P E C I E S H A B I T Major Arterial
e.g., San Jacinto Ave
10–15+
FEET 50%
3 LEVEL 3
Linear root barriers (24" depth) +
structural soil throughout tree well
Sub-surface drip or
high-efficiency rotors
High-canopy, large-stature
shade trees
Secondary
Arterial
Cross-town corridors
8–10
FEET 40% 3 LEVEL 3
Linear root barriers (24" depth)
Sub-surface drip Broad-headed, medium-to-large
stature
Collector Street
Neighborhood feeders
6–8 FEET 30% 2 LEVEL 2
Circular root guards (18" depth)
Bubblers or sub-surface
drip
Upright / columnar or medium
stature
Residential Local
Interior neighborhood
streets
5–6 FEET 25% 1 LEVEL 1
Individual tree root guards
Bubblers Small-to-medium stature, lowlitter
Industrial /
Commercial
Service & employment
zones
6–10 FEET 30%
2 LEVEL 2
Linear barriers at curb & sidewalk
edges
Sub-surface drip High-durability, pollution-tolerant
W I D T H M E A S U R E M E N T
Minimum parkway width is measured from back-of-curb
to back-of-sidewalk, exclusive of any hardscape treewell.
R O O T P R O T E C T I O N L E V E L S
Level 1 = individual guards; Level 2 = circular or edge barriers; Level 3 = continuous linear barriers, often
paired with structural soil.
S P E C I E S S E L E C T I O N
Preferred habit establishes scale fit; final species shall be drawn from the § 3.5 Street Tree Species Matrix subject to utility and offset constraints.
C I T Y O F S A N J A C I N T O | D E S I G N S TA N D A R D S M A N U A L § 3 . 7 S T R E E T T R E E R O A D WAY M AT R I X Min. width Target % Protection requirement Delivery standard Preferred form PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
35 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
Relevant Experience
Carson Streetscape Master Plan
In our work on the Carson Streetscape Master Plan, RHA Community Works tackled the challenge of transforming a high-traffic industrial and commercial corridor into a cohesive, pedestrian-friendly environment. We developed a comprehensive palette of street trees and parkway treatments that could withstand the rigors of heavy urban use while significantly improving the City’s aesthetic identity. This project required precise coordination between aesthetic goals and the technical realities of existing underground infrastructure—a direct parallel to the work required for San Jacinto.
Sample pages from Carson Streetscape Master Plan shown below:
Victoria Avenue Beautification - City of Riverside
Managing the preservation and expansion of
the historic Victoria Avenue corridor required
a sophisticated understanding of parkway
constraints. RHA Community Works navigated
complex issues involving multi-use trails, legacy
irrigation systems, and the long-term health of
diverse tree species in high-visibility public rightsof-way. This experience in managing “signature” city corridors ensures that the standards we
develop for San Jacinto will protect the City’s
heritage while preparing its infrastructure for
future growth.
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
36 Task 7: Trails and Open Space Implementation Standards The City of San Jacinto’s unique geography, defined by its proximity to the San Jacinto River, agricultural heritage, and growing residential footprint, requires a specialized set of standards for its trails and open space network. RHA+CW will develop implementation standards that transition the visionary goals of the San Jacinto Trails Master Plan into actionable, constructible technical requirements. Our approach to Task 7 focuses on three core pillars: Safety & Visibility, Material Durability, and Regulatory Compliance.
Multi-Modal Trail Classification
Building upon the General Plan 2040 and the Trails Master Plan, RHA+CW will establish standardized cross-sections and technical specifications for the City’s diverse trail hierarchy:
• Class I Multi-Use Paths: Standards for paved, off-street paths that accommodate both pedestrians and cyclists, focusing on proper width, vertical clearance, and ADA-compliant surfacing. • Nature & Perimeter Trails: Development of specifications for stabilized decomposed granite (DG) or natural surface trails within open space buffers, prioritizing erosion control and habitat protection. • Equestrian Trails: Specialized standards for San Jacinto’s equestrian community, including appropriate fencing (e.g., lodgepole or white vinyl), specialized trail surfacing, and “hitching” or “rest station” amenities.
Safety, Wayfinding, and Inclusive Design
Open spaces are only effective if they are accessible and safe. Our team, led by Scott Rice (CASp), will ensure every trail standard meets the latest California Building Code (Title 24) accessibility requirements for outdoor developed areas.
• CPTED Integration: We will apply “Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design” (CPTED) principles to trail standards, specifying appropriate lighting, sightline maintenance, and “defensible space” planting near trailheads.
• Unified Wayfinding: We will design a suite of standard trail signage, including mileage markers, directional kiosks, and interpretive educational panels that highlight San Jacinto’s agricultural history and local ecology.
Maintenance-Driven Technical Details
To protect the City’s General Fund, our standards prioritize long-term durability. We will provide AutoCAD-ready details for:
• Standardized Fencing & Bollards: Durable, low-maintenance options that clearly define public/ private boundaries and prevent unauthorized vehicle access. • Erosion & Drainage Control: Technical specifications for “outsloped” trails, water bars, and swales to minimize trail washouts and siltation in open space basins. •Amenity “Kits”: Pre-approved details for trail benches, waste receptacles, and pet waste stations to ensure a cohesive aesthetic across all city trails.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY’S LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, PARK, BASIN,
PARKWAY AND STREET TREE DESIGN STANDARDS - CITY OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 27, 2026
37 Task 8: Basin & Pump Station Standards
In modern municipal planning, stormwater infrastructure can no longer be viewed solely as a utilitarian necessity; it must be integrated into the community fabric as a multi-functional asset. RHA+CW will develop Integrated Basin Design Standards for San Jacinto that transform traditional dry and wet basins into aesthetic or recreational features, often referred to as “Nature-Based Infrastructure”, while maintaining the highest level of engineering performance.
Our approach focuses on the “Dual-Use” potential of drainage areas. We will establish standards that allow basins to serve as passive open space, native habitat corridors, or even active recreational fields during dry weather, provided they meet strict safety and percolation requirements. Simultaneously, we will define Technical Infrastructure Specifications for the essential “hard” components of these systems, including:
• Pump Station Architecture: Creating standards for
pump housing that utilize durable, anti-graffiti materials and aesthetic screening (such as decorative masonry or
specialized planting) to minimize visual impact on
neighboring properties.
• Safety and Security Fencing: Mandating high-quality,
climb-resistant fencing that balances public safety with the City’s aesthetic goals, moving away from standard chain-link in favor of more integrated, low-profile barrier designs. • Erosion and Sediment Control: Providing technical details for forebays, energy dissipaters, and slope stabilization that utilize natural stone or reinforced vegetation to reduce long-term maintenance dredging.
The final deliverable will be a Basin Technical Toolkit that includes cross-sectional details for various basin types, pump station footprints, and a list of “Basin-Appropriate” vegetation that can survive periodic inundation and improve water quality through biofiltration.
Methodology Highlights
• Hydrological Integration: Working closely with City Engineers to ensure that aesthetic enhancements do not compromise the “Calculated Storage Capacity” or emergency overflow pathways of the basin.
• Low-Impact Development (LID): Aligning basin standards with regional water quality requirements to ensure they function as effective infiltration points for groundwater recharge. • Accessibility and Egress: Establishing standards for maintenance access ramps that double as pedestrian paths or “observation points” for the community.