Agenda packet — San Jacinto City Council, August 4, 2026 (part 1 of 5)

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2026
6:30 PM OPEN SESSION

COMMUNITY CENTER
625 S. PICO AVENUE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92583
951-487-7330
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 951-487-7330 ext. 339. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].

The City Council meeting may be observed virtually by accessing https://horizon.agendalink.app/engagev2/sanjacintoca/agendas and selecting the “Watch” button next to the corresponding agenda for the meeting date, or in person at the San Jacinto Community Center.

Public Comments will only be accepted in person during the meeting or in writing to the City Clerk no later than 3:00 PM on the day of the meeting.

Watch the Meeting (Official Livestream)
The official way to watch and listen to the City Council meeting is through the City's AgendaLink livestream by selecting the "Watch" option for the applicable meeting on the City's website.

Provide Live Public Comment by Telephone
Members of the public wishing to provide live public comment may participate by telephone using the Microsoft Teams dial-in information below. The telephone line is intended only for individuals who wish to address the City Council during the designated Public Comment period.

Dial in by phone:
+1 (951) 465-7684
Conference ID: 444 922 998#
Public Comment Workflow
When the Mayor opens the Public Comment portion of the meeting, the process will be as follows:

CRYSTAL RUIZ, MAYOR

CLARISA SANCHEZ, MAYOR PRO TEM

PHILAYALA, COUNCILMEMBER

ALONSO LEDEZMA, COUNCILMEMBER

VALERIE VANDEVER, COUNCILMEMBER
Members of the public will call the Teams dial-in number and wait in the Teams lobby.

Callers should remain in the Teams lobby until the applicable Public Comment period opens. They should not be admitted before the Mayor opens Public Comment.

The Clerk will admit one caller at a time from the lobby as they are ready to speak. If multiple callers are waiting, they should remain in the lobby until it is their turn.

Once admitted, callers should be able to speak. If necessary, the Clerk can unmute the caller.

The Mayor will recognize the caller, and the caller should first state their name for the record before providing their public comment.

Each caller will have up to three (3) minutes to speak.

After completing their comments, callers may either hang up, or the Clerk may remove them from the meeting before admitting the next speaker.

Written public comments may only be submitted via email to [email protected] or by hard copy to the Office of the City Clerk at 595 S. San Jacinto Ave., San Jacinto, CA 92583, no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Please identify the agenda item number and “PUBLIC COMMENT” in the subject line of the email or hard copy document. All written correspondence received by the 3:00 p.m. deadline will be distributed to the legislative body prior to the meeting and retained with the official meeting record. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern in-person speaker comments at the Council meeting.

Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk will read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Council meeting.

The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Council meeting.

1. ORGANIZATION

1.1 Roll Call

1.2 Invocation

1.3 Pledge of Allegiance

1.4 Mayor/Council Member Reports

1.5 Late Items

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. City Council
A1. Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading by Title Only A2. Opposition to Senate Bill 1379 Regarding the Separation of the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office and Coroner’s Bureau

RECOMMENDATION
The Riverside County Sheriff’s Office recommends that the City Council:
— 1. APPROVE a letter opposing Senate Bill 1379; and
— 2. AUTHORIZE the Interim City Manager to transmit the signed letter on behalf of the City Council.

A3. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 26-04, A Change of Zone for the Chacon Farm Project RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
— 1. DETERMINE that the Project was previously analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Chacon Farms Project (SCH# 2025101241) adopted on July 21, 2026, per Section §15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, and no further review is required. — 2. CONDUCT the Second Reading and ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 26-04 entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE PLAN23- 0005, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL RURAL (RR) TO RESIDENTIAL LOW DENISTY (RL) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ESPLANADE AVENUE AND CAWSTON AVENUE.

A4. Use of ARPA Funds CY 26 Q2
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE and FILE the report of the ARPA funds.

4. PUBLIC HEARING

4.1 Resolution Adopting a Schedule of Water Rate Adjustments Effective January 1, 2027 through and including January 1, 2031
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
— 1. ADOPT Resolution No. 4144 Adopting Findings and Determinations Regarding Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and to Proceed with Public Hearing;
— 2. CONDUCT a Public Hearing; and
— 3. ADOPT Resolution No. 4145 Adopting a Schedule of Water Rate Adjustments Effective January 1, 2027 through and including January 1, 2031 and Making CEQA Findings.

4.2 Resolution Adopting a Schedule of Sewer Rate Adjustments Effective January 1, 2027 through and including January 1, 2031
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
— 1. ADOPT Resolution No. 4146 Adopting Findings and Determinations Regarding Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and to Proceed with Public Hearing;
— 2. CONDUCT a Public Hearing; and
— 3. ADOPT Resolution No. 4147 Adopting a Schedule of Sewer Rate Adjustments Effective January 1, 2027 through and including January 1, 2031 and Making CEQA Findings.

5. DISCUSSION ITEMS

5.1 1st Street Improvements from Ramona Boulevard to San Jacinto Avenue (CIP #26-005) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
— 1. APPROVE the plans and specifications for the 1st Street Improvements from Ramona Boulevard to San Jacinto Avenue (CIP# 26-005);
— 2. AWARD the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid, LC Paving & Sealing, Inc., for the sum of $270,093.50;
— 3. ALLOCATE 15% ($40,514.03) of total bid for construction contingencies; — 4. ALLOCATE 18.5% ($49,967.30) of total bid for construction administration, inspection, equipment procurement, and testing;
— 5. APPROPRIATE an additional $144,800.04 from Measure "A" Fund 022 to CIP #26-005; and — 6. AUTHORIZE the Interim City Manager to execute the construction contract.

6. FUTURE REQUESTS FROM CITY COUNCIL TO CITY MANAGER

7. ADJOURNMENT
DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS (SB343) - Any public record, relating to an open session agenda item, that is distributed within 72 hours prior to the meeting is available for public inspection at the public counter located in the Administration Building of City Hall, 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583.

I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this July 30, 2026 as requested by law.
____________________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
Posted Date: July 30, 2026
Date Posted: July 30, 2026
August 4, 2026
TO: City Council

REQUESTED
BY:

James Burton, Chief of Police

APPROVED
BY:

Travis Randel, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

Opposition to Senate Bill 1379 Regarding the Separation of the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office and Coroner’s Bureau
RECOMMENDATION:

The Riverside County Sheriff’s Office requests that the City Council:

1. APPROVE a letter opposing Senate Bill 1379; and

2. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to transmit the signed letter on behalf of the City Council.

BACKGROUND:

The City contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office for law enforcement services. The Sheriff’s Office has requested that the City formally oppose Senate Bill 1379, which would require Riverside County to separate the Coroner’s Bureau from the Sheriff’s Office and establish it as an independent county department.

Because the requested action involves the City taking a formal position on pending state legislation, the matter is being presented to the City Council for consideration.

DISCUSSION:

The Riverside County Sheriff’s Office currently operates as an integrated organization in which deputies, investigators, and Coroner’s Bureau personnel coordinate investigations involving suspicious, unattended, or traumatic deaths. The Sheriff’s Office has expressed concern that establishing a separate Coroner’s Department could create additional administrative structures, duplicate existing functions, increase costs, and reduce operational efficiency.

The proposed opposition letter identifies several potential impacts of SB 1379, including:

Reduced coordination among deputies, homicide investigators, and coroner personnel; Delays in response and decision-making resulting from separate administrative and command structures; Less direct communication and accountability between the City and the agencies responsible for public safety and death investigations;
Disruption to coordinated communication with victims’ families; and Increased local costs associated with duplicating personnel, facilities, administrative services, and operational support.

The letter also notes that the Riverside County Executive Office recently reviewed the potential separation of the Sheriff’s Office and Coroner’s Bureau and concluded that separation would increase costs, duplicate services, and reduce efficiency.

Approval of the attached letter would formally communicate the City Council’s opposition to SB 1379 and request a “NO” vote from the Legislature.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with approving and transmitting the opposition letter. The letter expresses concern that implementation of SB 1379 could increase county costs and potentially affect the cost or level of services provided to contract cities.

Attachments
SB 1379 (Cervantes) – OPPOSE.pdf

CRYSTAL RUIZ, MAYOR

CLARISA SANCHEZ, MAYOR PRO TEM

PHILLIP AYALA, COUNCILMEMBER

ALONSO LEDEZMA, COUNCILMEMBER

VALERIE VANDERVER, COUNCILMEMBER

TRAVIS RANDEL, INTERIM CITY MANAGER
WWW.SANJACINTOCA.GOV | 595 S. SAN JACINTO AVENUE, SAN JACINTO CA 92583 | 951-487-7330 August 4, 2026
The Honorable Senator Cervantes
and Members of the Assembly
RE: SB 1379 (Cervantes) – OPPOSE
Dear Senator Cervantes and Honorable Members of the Assembly:

On behalf of the City of San Jacinto, we respectfully oppose SB 1379. Our city contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff's Office for law enforcement services. As a contract city, we depend upon an integrated Sheriff's Office that provides seamless public safety services to our residents, including the close coordination that currently exists between deputies, investigators, and the Coroner's Bureau following suspicious, unattended, or traumatic deaths.

SB 1379 would fundamentally alter that relationship by removing the Coroner from the Sheriff's Office and creating a separate county department. While the stated purpose of the bill is to increase public confidence, we are concerned that it will instead create additional bureaucracy, duplicate administrative functions, and reduce the efficiency that our residents currently receive.

Our City is particularly concerned that separating these functions may impact:
• Timely coordination between deputies, homicide investigators, and coroner personnel during death investigations.
• Response times resulting from an additional layer of government and separate administrative command structures.
• Direct communication and accountability for our City Council, city management, and residents, who currently work through a single Sheriff's organization to address public safety concerns.
• Communication with victims' families, who currently benefit from coordinated case management and established relationships within the Sheriff's Office. • Increased local costs resulting from the duplication of personnel, facilities, administrative services, and operational support.

The Riverside County Executive Office recently completed an extensive review of this issue and concluded that separating the Sheriff's Office and Coroner would increase costs, duplicate services, reduce efficiency, and would not be in the best interests of the County. We are concerned that SB 1379 disregards those findings while imposing a county-specific mandate that will directly affect the level of service our residents receive.

WWW.SANJACINTOCA.GOV | 595 S. SAN JACINTO AVENUE, SAN JACINTO CA 92583 | 951-487-7330 Public safety is strongest when local governments retain the flexibility to organize services in the manner that best serves their communities. Decisions regarding the structure of county public safety services should remain local whenever possible, particularly where existing statewide reforms are already being implemented to address concerns surrounding in-custody deaths.

For these reasons, the City of San Jacinto respectfully requests your "NO" vote on SB 1379.

Sincerely,
__________________ __________________ __________________ Crystal Ruiz Clarissa Sanchez Phil Ayala
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember
__________________ __________________
Alonso Ledezma Valerie Vandever
Councilmember Councilmember
August 4, 2026
TO: City Council

REQUESTED
BY:

Yaneli Hernandez, Senior Planner

APPROVED
BY:

Travis Randel, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 26-04, A Change of Zone for the Chacon Farm Project RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. DETERMINE that the Project was previously analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Chacon Farms Project (SCH# 2025101241) adopted on July 21, 2026, per Section §15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, and no further review is required.

2. CONDUCT the Second Reading and ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 26-04 entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE PLAN 23-0005, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL RURAL (RR) TO RESIDENTIAL LOW

DENSITY (RL) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ESPLANADE AVENUE AND CAWSTON AVENUE
BACKGROUND:

On July 21, 2026, following a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2025101241) for the Chacon Farms project. In addition, the City Council also adopted Resolution No. 4138 approving a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Very Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential, adopted Resolution No. 4141 approving a Planned Development Permit and Tentative Tract Map 39076, and introduced Ordinance No. 26‑04 to change the Zone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density. The adoption of the resolutions and the introduction of Ordinance No. 26-04, were approved by a unanimous vote of 4 ayes to 0 nays (Ayes: Ruiz, Sanchez, Ledezma, Vandever; Absent: Ayala).

While the resolutions are effective immediately upon adoption, the associated ordinance requires both a first reading (introduction) and a second reading (adoption) and becomes effective 30 days after adoption. If approved on second reading by the City Council, Ordinance No. 26-04 would take effect September 3, 2026. The proposed ordinance implements the corresponding zone change to ensure consistency between the applicable Titles of the Municipal Code and the General Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no impact to the General Fund by approving the project.

Attachments
Ordinance_26-04.pdf
City_Council_Staff_Report_7212026.pdf
Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 1 of 9 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ORDINANCE NO. 26-04
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE PLAN23-
0005, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL RURAL (RR)

TO RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (RL) LOCATED AT THE

NORTHWEST CORNER OF ESPLANADE AVENUE AND CAWSTON
AVENUE
WHEREAS, Change of Zone Case PLAN23-0005 was filed, together with General Plan Amendment PLAN23-0004, (”Applications”) for the Chacon Farms project in order to establish a higher density residential development; and
WHEREAS, the requested Zone Change PLAN23-0005 would change the zoning designation of the Subject Site from Residential Rural (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL) (the “Zone Change”); and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Project (“MND”) was circulated between October 28, 2025 and November 27, 2025; and WHEREAS, the MND analyzed the impacts related to the proposed Zone Change; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Public Resource Code section 21080.3.1, on February 21, 2024, the City sent letters to the California Native American Tribes that had previously requested to be informed by the City through formal notification of proposed projects in the geographic area that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribe, for the purpose of informing these tribes about the Project, and the City provided a 30-day period for the representative of the tribe to request formal consultation; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 62352.3, on February 21,2024 the City sent letters to the California Native American Tribes that are on the contact list maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission, for the purpose of informing these tribes about the Project and providing a 90-day period for the representative of the tribe to request formal consultation. Subsequently the City redistributed a SB 18 letter on February 4, 2026 for tribes that were inadvertently omitted from the distribution list; and WHEREAS, the City received a request for consultation from the Soboba Tribe of Luiseno Indians, which occurred on April 4, 2024 and resulted in conditions included in the conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, the City received a request for consultation from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, which occurred on March 4, 2024 and resulted in deferring to Soboba Tribe of Luiseno Indians; and
WHEREAS, entitlements for the Project include the Zone Change which requires the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing and recommend to the City Council that the proposed Zone Change be approved, disapproved, or conditionally approved.

Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 2 of 9 ends

WHEREAS, on March 14, 2026, the City gave public notice of the Planning Commission public hearing for consideration of the Zone Change by advertising in a newspaper of general circulation; by posting notices at City Hall and by mailing notices to owners of property within 300 feet, of the Project, and to local agencies that provide water, sewage, electricity and schools; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to consider Project approvals, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment on the Zone Change, and the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Zone Change, as conditioned; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2026, the City gave public notice of the City Council public hearing for consideration of the Zone Change by advertising in a newspaper of general circulation; by posting notices at City Hall; and by mailing notices to owners of property within 300 feet of the Project, and to local agencies that provide water, sewage, electricity and schools; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 2026 the City Council conducted a duly-noticed public hearing and considered evidence concerning the Zone Change.

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. Findings: The City Council hereby finds that the Zone Change is compatible with the objectives, policies, and General Plan land use programs specified in the General Plan, as amended by the Application, for the following reasons:
a. The proposed Zone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL) will further the intent of the General Plan by providing a variety of new housing opportunities that will complement surrounding uses of primarily residential developments. Specifically, the Change of Zone will continue to allow the development of residences on the project site with a density range of 2.1 to 7 dwelling units to the acre in lieu of the current density range of 0-2 dwelling units to the acre with the Low Density Residential (LDR) designation. With proposed Change of Zone, the proposed project will conform with the goals and policies of the General Plan, including the applicable goals and policies of the Land Use Element and Housing Element, as detailed below:

Land Use Goal 1: A community with a land use plan that accommodates a mix of uses to meet current and future needs.

Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 3 of 9 ends

• The Project is consistent with Policy LU-1.6 through the incorporation of multiple neighborhood parks, open space areas, and an interconnected system of pedestrian paseos. These features provide accessible recreational opportunities and functional gathering spaces for future residents.

Land Use Goal 2: A City that manages and directs growth so that the community and its neighborhoods are protected and enhanced.

Specifically implementing policy 2.1 & 2.2
• The Project supports Policies LU-2.1 and LU-2.2 by promoting an orderly and coordinated pattern of development that is compatible with surrounding residential uses. The Project site is adjacent to existing and planned residential neighborhoods and proposes a density that is consistent with the Low Density Residential designation.
• The Project includes an interconnected circulation network designed to improve internal connectivity, provide efficient vehicular and pedestrian access, and enhance access to on-site open space and neighborhood amenities. The Project also provides connectivity to the Class I multi-use path along Esplanade Avenue, supporting multimodal access.
• The Project provides a balanced distribution of open space and recreational amenities throughout the site, ensuring that residents have convenient access to neighborhood parks and contributing to the overall quality and livability of the community.

The Project has been reviewed for consistency with applicable infrastructure and service requirements and will coordinate with appropriate service providers, including Eastern Municipal Water District, to ensure adequate utilities and public services are provided.

Based on the foregoing, the proposed Change of Zone is internally consistent with the goals, policies, and land use framework of the General Plan and will not create inconsistencies with other provisions of the Plan.

Health, Safety and Welfare. The proposed Change of Zone will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, and will instead facilitate development of a planned residential community consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Project furthers this consistency by promoting public health and safety through a planned layout that emphasizes pedestrian safety and encourages physical activity and well-being, with four community parks connected by an integrated network of pathways providing residents a range of social and recreational opportunities. With the support of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, the Project will further support and promote the general welfare of San Jacinto residents by encouraging walkability, community engagement, integrated open space, pedestrian safety, and an active lifestyle, with the integrated community parks and connecting path network facilitating recreation and socialization.

Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 4 of 9 ends

b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;
The proposed Change of Zone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL) is consistent with the General Plan with the adoption of the proposed General Plan Amendment. The RL zoning designation is the implementing zone for the Low Density Residential (LDR) General Plan land use designation and will ensure consistency between the General Plan and Zoning Map. The Project site is not located within a Specific Plan area; therefore, no Specific Plan applies.
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

The proposed Change of Zone will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. The amendment will facilitate the development of a planned residential community that is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The Project incorporates an interconnected circulation system, neighborhood parks, and pedestrian amenities that promote walkability and community interaction.

The Project has been reviewed by applicable City departments and service providers to ensure that adequate infrastructure and public services, including police, fire, utilities, and emergency access, are available to serve the site. As conditioned, the Project will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding area and will support orderly and coordinated development. d. Additional findings for Zoning Map amendments
i. The affected site(s) is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities (e.g., fire protection, police protection, potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.), to ensure that the requested zoning designation and the proposed or anticipated uses and/or development will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the property is located.

The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed Residential Low Density (RL) zoning designation in terms of design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics. The site is of sufficient size and configuration to accommodate the proposed residential development, including internal circulation, open space, and required infrastructure.

The Project is located adjacent to existing and planned residential development and represents a logical extension of the surrounding land use pattern. The proposed street network is designed to provide adequate access for residents, service providers, and emergency response vehicles and will be subject to Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 5 of 9 ends

review and approval by the City’s Engineering Department and Riverside County Fire Department.

Adequate public services and utilities are available, or will be provided, to serve the Project, including potable water, wastewater, storm drainage, solid waste services, and schools. The Project has been reviewed by relevant agencies and departments to ensure that the proposed zoning and anticipated development will not endanger or otherwise constitute a hazard to surrounding properties or improvements.

SECTION 3. CEQA. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied in that an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (together, “IS/MND”) were prepared for the Project, including the Zone Change, and the City Council adopted the MND and the related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

SECTION 4. Zone Change. The City Council hereby adopts this Ordinance approving Zone Change PLAN23-0005 to change the zoning designation of the Subject Site from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL) as shown on the Map that is attached to this ordinance as Exhibit “B.”
The City of San Jacinto Zoning Map, as amended by this ordinance, shall govern the zoning for the Subject Site. The development of the Subject Site, and all subsequent approvals, shall be in compliance with the Zoning applicable to the Subject Site now or in the future, to the extent other planning, zoning, land use, development, and development approval process regulations adopted by the City are applicable and not inconsistent or in conflict with the zoning designation for the Subject Site.

SECTION 5. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City Clerk’s office located at 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk.

SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following its adoption.

SECTION 8. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once within 15 days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of San Jacinto, and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code § 36933.

Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 21st day of July 2026.

Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 6 of 9 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 26-04
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council on the 4th day of August 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
_______________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
__________________________
Craig Hayes, City Attorney
Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 7 of 9 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ORDINANCE NO. 26-04
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
I, Julia Espinoza, duly appointed City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 26-04 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the 21st day of July 2026. Ordinance No. 26-04 was passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4
th day of August 2026:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 4
th day of August 2026.
_____________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit “A”: Map of Subject Property
Exhibit “B”: Zone Change Map
Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 8 of 9 ends

EXHIBIT A: Map of Subject Property
Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 9 of 9 ends

EXHIBIT B: Zone Change Map
July 21, 2026
TO: City Council

REQUESTED
BY: Yaneli Hernandez, Senior Planner

APPROVED
BY:

Travis Randel, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

A proposal by Taylor and Clark Consulting on behalf of Chacon, LLC, to establish a master-planned residential development consisting of 419 dwelling units as well as the construction of onsite roadways, a detention basin, parks, and on-site landscaping on 73.97-net acres.

RECOMMENDATION:

The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:

1. DETERMINE that the proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures based on the findings set forth in the case record and ADOPT a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);

2. ADOPT Resolution No. 4138 to ADOPT the General Plan Amendment entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLAN23-0004 FROM VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW

DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE CHACON FARMS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ESPLANADE AVENUE AND CAWSTON AVENUE;

3. INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 26-04 to APPROVE the Change of Zone entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE PLAN23-0005, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL RURAL (RR) TO

RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (RL) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ESPLANADE AVENUE AND CAWSTON AVENUE; and

4. ADOPT Resolution No. 4141 to APPROVE the Project entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (PLAN23-0004) FROM VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, A CHANGE OF ZONE (PLAN23-0005) CHANGING THE ZONING FROM

RESIDENTIAL RURAL (RR) TO RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (RL), A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH 419 DWELLING UNITS, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 39076 TO SUBDIVIDE THE 73.97 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ESPLANADE AVENUE AND CAWSTON AVENUE.

DISCUSSION:

On March 24, 2026, the Planning Commission, after holding a Public Hearing, unanimously adopted PC Resolution No. 26- 01, recommending that the City Council approve PROJ23-0029 (“Project”).

The Project is a proposal by Taylor and Clark Consulting on behalf of Chacon, LLC, to establish a master-planned residential development consisting of 419 homes as well as the construction of onsite roadways, detention basins, parks, and on-site landscaping on 73.97 net acres. To facilitate the development, the applicant submitted a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Change of Zone (CZ), Planned Development Permit (PDP), and Tentative Tract Map (TTM 39076) for review and approval.

While most subdivisions are approved by the Planning Commission, projects that contain policy decisions, such as a GPA, CZ, and PDP, require review and approval of the City Council.

The Project site is located on the west side of Cawston Avenue, extending between Seventh Street and Esplanade Avenue. The project site is currently occupied by Chacon Farms and Bruno Ranches agricultural operations, which includes two singlefamily residences occupied by caretakers. The project site is surrounded by residential uses to the north and east, residential and agricultural uses to the west, and a dairy farm to the south. The current General Plan Land Use Designation is Very Low Density Residential, and the current Zone is Rural Residential. The existing designations allows a maximum of 2 units per gross acre (151 dwelling units for the project site).

The proposed General Plan Amendment designation is Low Density Residential (LDR) and the proposed zoning is Residential Low Density (RL). The LDR and RL designations allow residential uses with densities ranging from 2.1 to 7 dwelling units per acre. This change is necessary to allow the developer to meet their project objectives to construct homes on smaller-lots, with a denser product type than is currently permitted on the site. The proposed designations are compatible with all the surrounding land uses and consistent with the character and density of the development north and west of the project. If adopted, the General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone would allow a minimum of 158 units and a maximum of 529 units.

Subdivision
TTM 39076 consists of 419 individual lots, ranging in size from 3,700 to 7,900 square feet. The subdivision would also establish internal roadways, basins, and designated open space and park areas. Two vehicular access points are planned, which include an east-west oriented roadway from Cawston Avenue, which borders the development to the east, and a north-south oriented roadway that connects to Seventh Street which borders the project to the north. These two proposed entrance roadways lead to a network of internal streets within the tract that ensure appropriate access to every facet of the development, including all homes, parks and basins. The new roads will be private streets that include curb, gutter, sidewalks and streetlights.

The internal roads will be private streets, maintained by an Homeowners Association (HOA) with parking allowed on one side of each street.

The recommended conditions of approval require the applicant to widen Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue and install improvement to each roadway that include curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights and landscaping. In addition, to ensure that nearby intersections will operate at acceptable levels with the additional traffic created, traffic signals will be required at the intersections of Cawston Avenue and Seventh Street as well as Cawston Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue. The Engineering and Fire Department have reviewed the project to ensure it meets all access and circulation requirements.

Frontage improvements, including curb, gutters and sidewalks, along Esplanade Avenue, which borders the project site to the south, will be constructed as part of the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which includes the widening of Esplanade Avenue from Warren Road to Sanderson Avenue. The CIP project also include a traffic signal at the intersection at Cawston Avenue and Esplanade Avenue and therefore it is not a required condition of approval. However, the Developer will be required to install the street lights and landscaping improvements along Esplanade Avenue, which are not covered by the City's CIP Project.

Planned Development Permit (PDP)
A PDP is also proposed as part of the Project to support the ultimate development of the subdivision. The PDP provides for a more efficient use of the land and a better living environment and also encourages enhanced amenities. The PDP incorporates the following design features and improvements to facilitate the proposed community:

Five different architectural styles for the homes with nine color schemes; A dual park and basin feature that provides both recreation space and functional stormwater infrastructure; Play equipment and design elements that reflect the agricultural character of the surrounding area; A coordinated landscape palette that complements the architectural character of the surrounding area; Decorative perimeter walls with stone veneer pilasters, enhanced with landscaping and vines; Tubular steel fencing with split-face block pilasters at the water quality basin; An enhanced entry feature along Cawston Avenue with accent landscaping and 24-inch box trees; A paseo connection to Esplanade Avenue providing pedestrian access to and from the community; Architectural design standards that exceed minimum Development Code requirements, including five floors plans with multiple elevation types and varied materials such as siding, brick and stone veneer, clay tile elements, and enhanced widow treatments.

The PDP also allows deviations from some of the Development Standards of the RL zone. The modifications to the development standards ensure a more efficient use of the project site, while remaining consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan, and market trends. The applicable standards are listed in the table below:

Development Feature RL Zone Development Code Proposed Proposed Modific Density 2.1-7.0 DU/AC 5.53 DU/AC No
Parcel Area (Net) 5,000 sq. ft. 3,717 sq. ft. Yes
Parcel Width Interior 50 ft. 45 ft. Yes
Parcel Width Corner 70 ft. 25 ft. Yes
Parcel Depth 100 ft. 60 ft. Yes
Setback Front of Building 20 ft. 10 ft. Yes
Setback to Front of Garage N/A 20 ft. N/A
Setback (Interior) 5 ft. 4 ft. Yes
Setback Street Side 10 ft. 5 ft. Yes
Setback Rear 20 ft. 10 ft. Yes
Rear with Slope 20 ft. 10 ft. Yes
Lot Coverage - Structure 55% 60% Yes
Primary Structure Height 35 ft. 35 ft. No
Proposed Homes
The proposed residential units would include 4 to 5 bedrooms, and optional loft spaces within specific floor plans. The development includes one- and two-story homes inspired by an agrarian architecture. The homes would range in size from approximately 1,758 to 3,025 square feet, providing a variety of housing options capable of meeting the needs of different household types and lifestyles. All homes would include a two-car garage as well as driveways that can accommodate additional parking.

PLANNING COMMISSION:

On March 24, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing for the proposed project. During the hearing, Staff recommended the modification of condition #79 and condition #108 requiring that the Development Impact Fees be subject to the provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect on the Vesting Date (3/31/2026). At the close of the Public Hearing, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted PC Resolution No. 26-01 (5-0 in favor), recommending that the City Council approve the project with the revised Conditions of Approval (attached).

Following Planning Commission review, staff added Condition No. 88 to the Conditions of Approval to require the applicant to construct a new traffic signal at the intersection of Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue. Although the Planning Commission staff report identified the signal improvement in the staff report to the Planning Commission, the condition was inadvertently omitted from the final compiled list of conditions. The addition of Condition No. 88 ensures consistency with the traffic analysis, reflects staff’s original recommendation, and maintains the full set of improvements necessary to support safe and efficient circulation in the project area.

In addition, Staff has also added Condition No. 61 to clarify that the developer/applicant shall design the residential units, common areas, recreation buildings, project amenities, and other permanent on-site facilities to operate on electrical power only, consistent with the assumptions evaluated in the Project’s Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and supporting Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy analysis.

PUBLIC NOTICING AND COMMENTS (CITY COUNCIL):

A 10-day notice of public hearing was advertised on June 26, 2026, in the Press Enterprise. In addition, notices of public hearing were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. As of the writing of this staff report, the City received four comment letters that have been included in the attachments.

CONCLUSION:

With approval of the General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development, and Tentative Tract Map, the Project would comply with all applicable provisions of the Development Code. Additionally, the proposed project will produce a development of superior quality and excellence in design through a variety of proposed enhancements within the community.

The modified development standards proposed within the PDP allows flexibility in site planning, while upholding the intentions and goals of the General Plan. Furthermore, the project is expected to cater to a different segment of the market that will be drawn to the community based on the smaller lot sizes, product types, and the overall project design. Based on this summary and the findings outlined in the report, staff, and the Planning Commission, support the project.

ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT:

This Project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and State CEQA guidelines with the preparation of an Initial Study to determine the potential environmental impacts of the project. The Initial Study concluded that with applied mitigation the Project would not result in a significant effect on the environment with the inclusion of mitigation measures related to Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources. The initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was circulated for a 30-day public comment period via the publication of a Notice of Intent on October 28, 2025. In addition to the publication, the IS/MND was submitted to the State Clearing House for posting (SCH No. 2025101241).

During the course of the project review, the City received comment letters from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the Department of Conservation, individuals associated with Talley Meadows Layups and Retirement business, and Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER). While CEQA does not require a written response to comments on an MND, Staff elected to prepare responses to the comments on the Draft IS/MND as a matter of good public policy and transparency. Accordingly, a Final IS/MND (attached) includes written responses to all comments received during the review of the project up until the writing of this report. No new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts have been identified and therefore, staff determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was the appropriate CEQA document in support of the Project.

The following is a brief summary of comments and responses:

Department of Toxic Substances (DTSC).

The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), provided recommendations regarding potential contaminants of concern (COCs).

Response:

As part of the MND a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared, which did not identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) requiring immediate subsurface investigation. However, additional soil sampling was also conducted, and no pesticides or heavy metals were detected in the shallow soil samples.

Department of Conservation
The Department of Conservation, provided advisory comments regarding the project’s potential conversion of Important Farmland.

Response:

This concern was previously evaluated in the Agriculture and Forestry Resources section of the City of San Jacinto General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The agricultural resource impacts associated with converting Important Farmland, including the infeasibility of preservation-based mitigation, were fully evaluated and disclosed in the General Plan 2040 EIR.

Talley Meadows Ranch
Talley Meadows Ranch provided concerns about traffic safety and pedestrian hazards on Cawston Avenue along the project frontage.

Response:

Issues related to the safety and functional design of the street frontage have been addressed through the engineering review and approval process, which ensures that all frontage improvements and design details comply with the City’s requirements and standards. The improvements required to address the traffic generated by the Project are included in the recommended Conditions of Approval for the Project. As mentioned above, the conditions require the applicant to widen both Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue and install improvement to each roadway that includes curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights and landscaping on west side of Cawston Avenue and the south side of Seventh Street. A preliminary signing and striping plan has been included in the staff report to illustrate how the traffic will circulate after the improvements have been installed, which has been review by the City Engineer to ensure traffic safety. In addition, a traffic signal will be required at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and Seventh Street which will enhance circulation.

Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility
In a letter dated March 24, 2026, the Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) asserted that the IS/MND is improper under CEQA due to its alleged failure to adequately assess the Project's potentially significant environmental impacts, requested preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the basis that a fair argument exists that the Project may have adverse environmental impacts, and reserved the right to supplement the comment throughout the administrative process. SAFER subsequently submitted an additional comment letter dated July 3, 2026, during the public review period, asserting that substantial evidence supports a fair argument that the Project may result in significant impacts related to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, indoor air quality, agricultural resources, and biological resources, and again requesting preparation of an EIR.

Response:

Staff has reviewed the SAFER letter dater July 3, 2026 and there are no issues that have been raised that require a revision to the Environmental Document or that necessitate the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. A response to the letter is being prepared in coordination with the Applicant and will be provided to the Council prior to the City Council Meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no impact to the General Fund by approving the project. As is typical with subdivisions, the project is conditioned to provide a funding mechanism for the ongoing maintenance of basins and parks within the project boundary. The funding mechanism is typically accomplished by annexation into a Community Facility District (CFD). The funding mechanism will ensure that the project does not rely on the General Fund to provide these services.

In addition, the project will also provide a funding mechanism to support public safety throughout the Project and City, which is typically accomplished by annexation of the project site into an existing Public Safety CFD.

Attachments
Resolution_4138.pdf
Ordinance_26-04.pdf
Resolution_4141.pdf
Planning_Commission_Recommended_Conditions_of_Approval_v2.pdf Resolution_-_PC_RESOLUTION_NO_26-01.pdf
Chacon_Farms_Final_ISMND_TTM_39076_5-26-26.pdf
Tentative_Tract_Map_39076.pdf
Planning_Commission_Staff_Report_March_24_2026.pdf
Findings_of_Fact.pdf
20260703Chacon_Farms_CC_Comments-_FINAL_with_Exhibits.pdf 20260324_SAFER_Comment_-_Chacon_Farms_Project.pdf
Public_Comment_Talley.pdf
Public_Comment_Tomoni.pdf
Resolution No. 4138

Page 1 of 9 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION No. 4138
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLAN23-0004 FROM

VERY LOW DESNITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE

CHACON FARMS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST

CORNER OF ESPLANADE AVENUE AND CAWSTON AVENUE
WHEREAS, Chacon LLC, filed an application on October 30, 2023 to amend the General Plan under PLAN23-0004 for the Chacon Farms residential development, (“Application”). The proposed project is located at the northwest corner of Esplanade Avenue and Cawston Avenue, APN’s 432-260-009, -026, and -027. (“Subject Site”); and WHEREAS, the Application, along with other applications submitted for the Subject Site, would establish the Chacon Farms residential community within the proposed Low Density Residential land use designation of the San Jacinto General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Project, including the Application, was reviewed, studied, and found to not have a significant effect on the environment under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) as more fully described in Section 3 below; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2026, the Planning Commission of the City of San Jacinto (“Commission”) conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project, including the Application, at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Project were heard and the Project was comprehensively reviewed; and
WHEREAS, on July 21, 2026, the City Council in the City of San Jacinto conducted duly noticed Public Hearings on the Application at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Application were heard and the Application was comprehensively reviewed by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, ordered and determined by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto:

Section 1. Based on the entire record before the City Council, including all written and oral evidence presented to the City Council, the administrative record of the written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, and the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council approves General Plan Amendment (PLAN23-0004).

Section 2. Based on the entire record before the City Council, including the staff report, and all written and oral evidence presented to the City Council, including the staff report, Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) the City Council find as follows:
a. The proposed General Plan Amendment (PLAN23-0004) to change the Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) designation on the Subject Site to Low Density Residential (LDR) creates consistency with the proposed Change of Zone to Residential Low Density (RL), Resolution No. 4138

Page 2 of 9 ends

and the Project will further the intent of the General Plan by facilitating development at the intersection of Esplanade Avenue and Palm Avenue. This location is advantageous for development. The Application furthers the intent of the General Plan by meeting the following General Plan goals and policies:

Land Use Goal 1: A community with a land use plan that accommodates a mix of uses to meet current and future needs.

Specifically implementing policy 1.3 & 1.6
• The Project supports Policy LU-1.3 by increasing the City’s housing supply within an established growth area and contributing toward the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The Project includes 419 single-family residential units within the allowable density range of the Low Density Residential designation, helping to meet current and future housing needs. • The Project is consistent with Policy LU-1.6 through the incorporation of multiple neighborhood parks, open space areas, and an interconnected system of pedestrian paseos. These features provide accessible recreational opportunities and functional gathering spaces for future residents.

Land Use Goal 2: A City that manages and directs growth so that the community and its neighborhoods are protected and enhanced.

Based on the foregoing, the proposed General Plan Amendment is internally consistent with the goals, policies, and land use framework of the General Plan and will not create inconsistencies with other provisions of the Plan.

Resolution No. 4138

Page 3 of 9 ends

b. The proposed General Plan Amendment (PLAN23-0004) to change the Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) designation on the subject property to Low Density Residential (LDR):

1. Will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

Health and Safety
The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and promotes public health and safety by incorporating a planned layout that emphasizes pedestrian safety and encourages physical activity and well-being. Four community parks, connected by an integrated network of pathways, will provide residents with a range of social and recreational opportunities.

Transit
The Project Site is approximately 0.6 miles (a 12-minute walk), from the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Go Micro service zone. Go Micro is RTA’s ondemand public transit service available within the Hemet-San Jacinto micro transit zone. Shared rides can be booked via the Go Micro app at user convenience, rather than relying on a predetermined bus schedule. Go Micro minibuses directly pick up and drop off passengers at desired locations, at desired times (provided both locations are within the micro transit zone and that the trip does not begin and end at route 44 bus stops).

Schools
The Project Site is located within the Hemet Unified School District and would likely be served by nearby schools, including Cawston Elementary School (1.3 miles), Rancho Viejo Middle School (0.9 miles), and Tahquitz High School (0.7 miles). The site may also be served by Megan Cope Elementary School (0.7 miles), which is within the San Jacinto Unified School District. In addition, Mt.

San Jacinto College is approximately five miles from the Project Site and is directly accessible via RTA’s on-demand transit service, Go Micro.

Welfare
The proposed project with the support of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, will support and promote the general welfare of San Jacinto residents. The proposed project, specifically, will support and promote walkability, community engagement, integrated open space, pedestrian safety, and an active lifestyle. Integrated Community Parks connected by a network of paths will facilitate recreation and socialization.

2. If an amendment to the Land Use Element, the affected site(s) is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating Resolution No. 4138

Page 4 of 9 ends

characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities (e.g., fire protection, police protection, potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.), to ensure that the proposed or anticipated uses and/or development will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the property is located; and
Physical Suitability
The proposed project, with the support of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute hazard to property in the vicinity in which the property is located and will be physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public emergency vehicle access and public services as follows:

Design
The Proposed Project is designed to be compatible with the surrounding San Jacinto community and consistent with adjacent residential uses. The development features an interconnected grid of streets that enhances walkability and provides convenient vehicle and pedestrian access to homes, community parks, and recreational amenities distributed throughout the site.

Residential architecture will include farmhouse, Spanish, and prairie styles, using quality materials such as stucco, brick, and stone, along with a varied but cohesive color palette that complements the broader community and individual streetscapes. These design elements enhance the visual character of the Chacon Farms community.

Location
The proposed development will complement and enhance surrounding land uses. Existing single-family residential neighborhoods are located to the north, northeast, and northwest across West 7th Street, as well as to the east across Cawston Avenue. To the west, the Esplanade Specific Plan includes approximately 130.7 acres of planned single-family residential development.

Shape and Size
The project site is generally rectangular in configuration and consists of three smaller rectangular parcels. The proposed project is designed to minimize sprawl and efficiently utilize the approximately 75.70 acres of site area. The site will accommodate 419 single-family homes with a minimum lot size of 3,717 square feet, along with designated open space for parks and a basin.

Resolution No. 4138

Page 5 of 9 ends

Operating Characteristics
The proposed project’s operating characteristics will be consistent with those of surrounding single-family developments. The proposed project will operate as a place of housing, enhanced by various amenities within several community parks, to prospective residents.

Public Emergency Vehicle Access
The proposed project’s inter-connected network of thoroughfares will contribute to emergency vehicle accessibility. The applicant will comply with any easement requirements for public emergency vehicle access. Further, the proposed public emergency vehicle access will be reviewed by City and County Departments including the City’s engineering department and Riverside County Fire, to ensure efficiency and safety for future residents.

Public Service and Utilities
Adequate City infrastructure exists to support the Project. Additionally, the project has been reviewed by Police, Fire, Public Utilities and Engineering to ensure that the design accommodates public and emergency vehicles including solid waste haulers, City crews, and other service providers

3. The City may reduce, require, or permit the reduction of the residential density for any parcel, or allow development of any parcel at a lower residential density, as defined in Government Code Section 65863, only if the following two additional findings are first made:
i. The reduction is consistent with the adopted General Plan, including the Housing Element; and
The proposed Project does not involve a reduction in residential density. The proposed General Plan Amendment would change the land use designation from Very Low Density Residential (0 to 2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Density Residential (2.1 to 7 dwelling units per acre), thereby allowing for an increase in residential density on the Project site. Accordingly, this finding is not applicable. Notwithstanding, the Project is consistent with the General Plan and Housing Element. ii. The remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing needs in compliance with Government Code Section 65584.

The proposed Project does not reduce residential density and therefore does not trigger this finding. Notwithstanding, the Housing Element identifies adequate sites to accommodate the City’s remaining Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), and the Project would increase the City’s housing supply and contribute toward meeting its RHNA obligations.

Section 3. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, including the staff report, the City Council finds that the nature and extent of all Resolution No. 4138

Page 6 of 9 ends

dedications, reservations, impact fees, and other exactions are roughly proportionate to the impacts created by the use of the Project Site as permitted by the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development Permit.

Section 4. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, including the staff report, the City Council finds that the Project will comply with CEQA for the following reasons:
a. Based upon the information contained in the Initial Study and pursuant to the requirements of CEQA; it has been determined that this Project, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, will not have a significant impact on the environment. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this Project on the environment are included in the Project design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program and are included as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this Project.

Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective on the date on which Ordinance 26-04 for the Change of Zone PLAN23-0005 becomes effective.

Section 6. CEQA. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied in that an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (together, “IS/MND”) were prepared for the Project, including the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Project and the City Council adopted the MND and the related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Section 7. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City Clerk’s office located at 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk.

Section 8. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.

PASSED, ADOPTED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 21st day of July 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
_______________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
Resolution No. 4138

Page 7 of 9 ends

ATTEST:
_____________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
__________________________
Craig Hayes, City Attorney
Resolution No. 4138

Page 8 of 9 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS

CITY OF SAN JACINTO)
I, Julia Espinoza, duly appointed City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 4138 was duly passed, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the 21st day of July 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Witness my hand and seal the 21st day of July 2026.
_____________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit “A”: General Plan Land Use Designation Change Map Resolution No. 4138

Page 9 of 9 ends

EXHIBIT A: General Plan Land Use Designation Change Map Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 1 of 8 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ORDINANCE NO. 26-04
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE PLAN23-
0005, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL RURAL (RR)

TO RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (RL) LOCATED AT THE

Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 2 of 8 ends

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Findings: The City Council hereby finds that the Zone Change is compatible with the objectives, policies, and General Plan land use programs specified in the General Plan, as amended by the Application, for the following reasons:
a. The proposed Zone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL) will further the intent of the General Plan by providing a variety of new housing opportunities that will complement surrounding uses of primarily residential developments. Specifically, the Change of Zone will continue to allow the development of residences on the project site with a density range of 2.1 to 7 dwelling units to the acre in lieu of the current density range of 0-2 dwelling units to the acre with the Low Density Residential (LDR) designation. With proposed Change of Zone, the proposed project will conform with the goals and policies of the General Plan, including the applicable goals and policies of the Land Use Element and Housing Element, as detailed below:

Land Use Goal 1: A community with a land use plan that accommodates a mix of uses to meet current and future needs.

Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 3 of 8 ends

Land Use Goal 2: A City that manages and directs growth so that the community and its neighborhoods are protected and enhanced.

Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 4 of 8 ends

Section 1. CEQA. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied in that an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (together, “IS/MND”) were prepared for the Project, including the Zone Change, and the City Council adopted the MND and the related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Section 2. Zone Change. The City Council hereby adopts this Ordinance approving Zone Change PLAN23-0005 to change the zoning designation of the Subject Site from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL) as shown on the Map that is attached to this ordinance as Exhibit “B.”
The City of San Jacinto Zoning Map, as amended by this ordinance, shall govern the zoning for the Subject Site. The development of the Subject Site, and all subsequent approvals, shall be in compliance with the Zoning applicable to the Subject Site now or in the future, to the extent other planning, zoning, land use, development, and development approval process regulations adopted by the City are applicable and not inconsistent or in conflict with the zoning designation for the Subject Site.

Section 3. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City Clerk’s office located at 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk.

Section 4. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.

Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following its adoption.

Section 6. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once within 15 days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of San Jacinto, and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code § 36933.

Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 21st day of July 2026.

Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 5 of 8 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 26-04
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 21st day of July 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
_______________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
__________________________
Craig Hayes, City Attorney
Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 6 of 8 ends

CERTIFICATION
State of California )
County of Riverside) ss
City of San Jacinto)
I, Julia Espinoza, duly appointed City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 26-04 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the 21st day of July 2026. Ordinance No. 26-04 was passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of July 2026:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Witness my hand and seal the 21st day of July 2026.
_____________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit “A”: Map of Subject Property
Exhibit “B”: Zone Change Map
Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 7 of 8 ends

EXHIBIT A: Map of Subject Property
Ordinance No. 26-04

Page 8 of 8 ends

EXHIBIT B: Zone Change Map
Resolution No. 4141

Page 1 of 18 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA) RESOLUTION NO. 4141
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN

JACINTO, CALIFRONIA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT (PLAN23-0004) FROM VERY LOW DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, A CHANGE OF
ZONE (PLAN23-0005) CHAGING THE ZONING FROM

RESIDENTIAL RURAL (RR) TO RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (RL),

A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH 419 DWELLING UNITS, AND
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 39076 TO SUBDIVIDE THE 73.97 ACRE

PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF

ESPLANADE AVENUE AND CAWSTON AVENUE
WHEREAS, Chacon, LLC submitted applications for a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 to subdivide approximately 73.97 net acres into 419 single-family residential lots, along with lettered lots for internal roadways, a detention basin, parks, and landscape areas, located between 7th Street to the north, Esplanade Avenue to the south, and west of Cawston Avenue (Project); and;
WHEREAS, the City, as Lead Agency, prepared an Initial Study in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) were prepared for the Project; and; WHEREAS, on March 24, 2026, the Planning Commission of the City of San Jacinto (“Commission”) conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Project were heard, and the Project was comprehensively reviewed, and the Project was recommended for approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on July 21, 2026, the City Council the City of San Jacinto conducted duly noticed public hearing on the Application at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Application were heard and the Application was comprehensively reviewed by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, ordered and determined by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto:

SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the City Council, all written and oral evidence presented, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the findings made in this Resolution, the City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment (PLAN23-0004), Change of Zone (PLAN23-0005), Planned Development Permit, Tentative Tract Map 39076 subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval in the staff report.

Resolution No. 4141

Page 2 of 18 ends

SECTION 2. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds:

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT

1. The amendment is internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;
The proposed General Plan Amendment from VLDR (Very Low Density Residential) to LDR (Low Density Residential) will further the intent of the General Plan by providing a variety of new housing opportunities that will complement surrounding uses of primarily residential developments.

Specifically the General Plan Amendment will continue to allow the development of residences on the project site with a density range of 2.1 to 7 dwelling units to the acre in lieu of the current density range of 0-2 dwelling units to the acre with the VLDR designation. With proposed General Plan Amendment, the proposed project will conform with the goals and policies of the General Plan, including the applicable goals and policies of the Land Use Element and Housing Element, as detailed below:

Land Use Goal 1: A community with a land use plan that accommodates a mix of uses to meet current and future needs.

Specifically implementing policy 1.3 & 1.6
• The Project supports Policy LU-1.3 by increasing the City’s housing supply within an established growth area and contributing toward the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The Project includes 419 single-family residential units within the allowable density range of the Low Density Residential designation, helping to meet current and future housing needs.
• The Project is consistent with Policy LU-1.6 through the incorporation of multiple neighborhood parks, open space areas, and an interconnected system of pedestrian paseos. These features provide accessible recreational opportunities and functional gathering spaces for future residents.

Land Use Goal 2: A City that manages and directs growth so that the community and its neighborhoods are protected and
enhanced.

Page 3 of 18 ends

amenities. The Project also provides connectivity to the Class I multi-use path along Esplanade Avenue, supporting multimodal access. • The Project provides a balanced distribution of open space and recreational amenities throughout the site, ensuring that residents have convenient access to neighborhood parks and contributing to the overall quality and livability of the community.

2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; Public Interest
The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and serves the public interest by providing a balanced mix of housing and amenities that meet community needs and enhance recreational and social opportunities. The project would contribute 419 residential units toward the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), offering a variety of housing types to accommodate diverse ages, incomes, and household needs. The homes are designed with architectural styles that complement the area’s rural character. Overall, the development promotes livability through walkability, community engagement, integrated open space, pedestrian safety, and support for an active lifestyle.

Convenience
The proposed project conforms with the provision of public convenience according to the General Plan. This development will create an additional 419 homes that are within a convenient distance to surrounding amenities and public infrastructure, including the following:
• Transit
The Project Site is approximately 0.6 miles (a 12-minute walk), from the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Go Micro service zone. Go Micro is RTA’s on-demand public transit service available within the Hemet-San Jacinto micro transit zone. Shared rides can be booked via the Go Micro app at user convenience, rather than relying on a predetermined bus schedule. Go Micro minibuses directly pick up and drop off passengers at desired locations, at desired times (provided both locations are within Resolution No. 4141

Page 4 of 18 ends

the micro transit zone and that the trip does not begin and end at route 44 bus stops).
• Schools
The Project Site is located within the Hemet Unified School District and would likely be served by nearby schools, including Cawston Elementary School (1.3 miles), Rancho Viejo Middle School (0.9 miles), and Tahquitz High School (0.7 miles). The site may also be served by Megan Cope Elementary School (0.7 miles), which is within the San Jacinto Unified School District. In addition, Mt. San Jacinto College is approximately five miles from the Project Site and is directly accessible via RTA’s on-demand transit service, Go Micro.

3. If an amendment to the Land Use Element, the affected site(s) is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities (e.g., fire protection, police protection, potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.), to ensure that the proposed or anticipated uses and/or development will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the property is located; and
Physical Suitability
The proposed project, with the support of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute hazard to property in the vicinity in which the property is located and will be physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public emergency vehicle access and public services as follows:
• Design
The Proposed Project is designed to be compatible with the surrounding San Jacinto community and consistent with adjacent residential uses. The development features an interconnected grid of streets that enhances walkability and provides convenient vehicle and pedestrian access to homes, community parks, and recreational amenities distributed throughout the site.

Page 5 of 18 ends

enhance the visual character of the Chacon Farms community.

The project will not interfere with existing water or sewer easements, as confirmed by the site boundary survey, and will comply with applicable landscaping and setback requirements. The site’s north–south orientation supports efficient solar design, with some east–west– oriented homes incorporated where feasible to allow for additional passive solar opportunities.
• Location
The proposed development will complement and enhance surrounding land uses. Existing single-family residential neighborhoods are located to the north, northeast, and northwest across West 7th Street, as well as to the east across Cawston Avenue. To the west, the Esplanade Specific Plan includes approximately 130.7 acres of planned singlefamily residential development. • Shape and Size
The project site is generally rectangular in configuration and consists of three smaller rectangular parcels. The proposed project is designed to minimize sprawl and efficiently utilize the approximately 75.70 acres of site area. The site will accommodate 419 single-family homes with a minimum lot size of 3,717 square feet, along with designated open space for parks and a basin.
• Operating Characteristics
The proposed projects operating characteristics will be consistent with those of surrounding single-family developments. The proposed project will operate as a place of housing, enhanced by various amenities within several community parks, to prospective residents. • Public Emergency Vehicle Access
The proposed project’s inter-connected network of thoroughfares will contribute to emergency vehicle accessibility. The applicant will comply with any easement requirements for public emergency vehicle access.

Further, the proposed public emergency vehicle access will be reviewed by City and County Departments including the City’s engineering department and Riverside County Fire, to ensure efficiency and safety for future residents.
• Public Service and Utilities
Adequate City infrastructure exists to support the Project. Additionally, the project has been reviewed by Police, Fire, Public Utilities and Engineering to ensure that the design accommodates public and emergency vehicles including solid waste haulers, City crews, and other service providers.

4. The City may reduce, require, or permit the reduction of, the residential density for any parcel to, or allow development of any parcel at, a lower residential density, as defined in Government Code Section 65863, only if the following two additional findings are first made:

Resolution No. 4141

Page 6 of 18 ends

a. The reduction is consistent with the adopted General Plan, including the Housing Element; and
The proposed Project does not involve a reduction in residential density. The proposed General Plan Amendment would change the land use designation from Very Low Density Residential (0 to 2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Density Residential (2.1 to 7 dwelling units per acre), thereby allowing for an increase in residential density on the Project site. Accordingly, this finding is not applicable. Notwithstanding, the Project is consistent with the General Plan and Housing Element. b. The remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing needs in compliance with Government Code Section 65584.

CHANGE OF ZONE:

1. Findings required for all Development Code and Zoning Map amendments.
a. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;
The proposed Change of Zone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL) is consistent with the General Plan with the adoption of the proposed General Plan Amendment. The RL zoning designation is the implementing zone for the Low Density Residential (LDR) General Plan land use designation and will ensure consistency between the General Plan and Zoning Map. The Project site is not located within a Specific Plan area; therefore, no Specific Plan applies.
b. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

The Project has been reviewed by applicable City departments and service providers to ensure that adequate infrastructure and public services, Resolution No. 4141

Page 7 of 18 ends

including police, fire, utilities, and emergency access, are available to serve the site. As conditioned, the Project will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding area and will support orderly and coordinated development.

2. Additional findings for Zoning Map amendments
a. The affected site(s) is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities (e.g., fire protection, police protection, potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.), to ensure that the requested zoning designation and the proposed or anticipated uses and/or development will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the property is located.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT:

1. The Planned Development Permit will:
a. Be allowed within the subject base zone;
The Project includes a Change of Zone to the Residential Low Density (RL) zone. The RL zone is intended to accommodate detached singlefamily residential development, along with accessory uses and other compatible uses, at a density range of 2.1 to 7.0 dwelling units per acre.

The Planned Development Permit is an allowed entitlement within the RL zone and is intended to provide flexibility from standard development requirements in order to achieve superior site design and Resolution No. 4141

Page 8 of 18 ends

community planning. Accordingly, the Planned Development Permit is permitted within the proposed base zone.
b. Be consistent with the purpose, intent, goals, policies, actions, and land use designations of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

The Project site is proposed to be designated Low Density Residential (LDR) under the General Plan, which permits detached single-family residential development at a density of 2.1 to 7.0 dwelling units per acre. The Project proposes a density of 5.53 dwelling units per acre, which is within the allowable range and consistent with the intended use of the LDR designation. The Project site is not located within a Specific Plan area.

The Project is consistent with the purpose and intent of the General Plan by facilitating a well-planned residential community that balances efficient land use with neighborhood compatibility and access to amenities. The Planned Development Permit allows for modifications to development standards that support a cohesive site design while maintaining consistency with the overall density and character envisioned by the General Plan.

The Project implements applicable General Plan goals and policies, including:
• Land Use Policy LU-1.6, by incorporating an integrated system of open space and recreational amenities, including multiple parks, paseos, and gathering areas that support community interaction and outdoor activity;
• Land Use Policy LU-4.4, by promoting pedestrian-oriented design through internal walkways, paseo connections, and access to the Class I multi-use trail along Esplanade
Avenue; and
• Land Use Policy LU-5.4, by providing well-designed, multifunctional open spaces, including neighborhood parks and a basin park, that serve a variety of recreational and community needs.

Based on the foregoing, the Planned Development Permit is consistent with the purpose, intent, goals, policies, and land use designations of the General Plan.
c. Be generally in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of this Development Code relating to both on-site and off-site improvements that are necessary to accommodate flexibility in site planning and property development and to carry out the purpose, intent, and requirements of this Chapter and the subject base Resolution No. 4141

Page 9 of 18 ends

zone, including prescribed development standards and applicable design guidelines, except for those provisions modified in compliance with this Chapter.

The Project is compliant with the Provisions of the Development Code relating to on-site and off-site improvements. The Project’s off-site improvements will include a Class 1 Multi-Use along Esplanade Avenue as required per the Trails Master Plan. Additionally, the Project will be conditioned to dedicate and provide improvement along Esplanade Avenue, Cawston Avenue, and Seventh Street. On-site improvements will include 3.26-acres of open space amenities and connections to the proposed Class I Multi-Use Trail. The proposed modified development standards for the Project will accommodate flexibility in site planning and property development, while still upholding the intentions and goals of the Development Code by creating a cohesive neighborhood community. Therefore, the Project is found to be compliant with all the applicable provisions of the development code relating to both on-site and off-site improvements.
d. Ensure compatibility of property uses within the zone and general neighborhood of the proposed development.

The Project will include single-family residential uses and complementary recreational and open space areas. The combination of uses is generally considered compatible and will create a cohesive residential neighborhood. The development of the Class I Multi-Use Trail will continue the intent of creating an integrated trails network throughout the City and will serve as an amenity for residents nearby and within the development. The Project site is bound by residential uses.

The surrounding land uses designations include: Specific Plan to the west, Low Density Residential to the north, Very Low Density Residential to the east, and City of Hemet to the south. Development surrounding the ProjectSite isplanned to be of similar character, land use, and density. Therefore, the proposed Project is found to be compatible the zone and with the general neighborhood of the proposed development.

2. The proposed project will produce a comprehensive development of superior quality and excellence of design (e.g., appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, significantly increased amounts of landscaping and improved open space, improved solutions to the design and placement of parking and loading facilities, incorporation of a program of highly enhanced amenities [e.g., additional public art], LEED or other “green” related standards, etc.) than might otherwise occur from more typical development applications;
The proposed Project includes 3.26-acres of common areas and recreational amenities. This includes play areas, turf / open space area, and picnic areas. The Resolution No. 4141

Page 10 of 18 ends

Project additionally proposes to construct a Class I Multi-Use Trail along Esplanade Avenue. This trail will include a meandering six (6) foot sidewalk, landscaped parkway located on both sides of the walkway, and proposed channel. This trail will connect to the internal pedestrian paths.

The architectural styles proposed will reflect styles farm style inspired. The Project, with its architectural styles, supporting landscape palette, open spaces, and monumentation, offers a development with excellence of design.

The architectural styles include Spanish, Prairie, and Farmhouse for the future 419 dwelling units, accompanied by nine (9) color schemes. The incorporation of multiple styles and color options is intended to enhance visual interest while maintaining a unified aesthetic throughout the subdivision. In addition, the PDP proposes five (5) distinct floor plans, each offering three (3) elevation types. The design of the residential lots and variation in architecture creates a diverse community and avoids a monotonous appearance.

3. Proper standards and conditions have been imposed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare;
The Project Site is currently and has historically been used for agricultural purposes. Due to this fact, the environmental analysis of the Project Site included a Phase I Environmental Safety Assessment (Phase I ESA) to analyze any hazards that could result from development of the site. The Phase I ESA found that due to the historical use of this property for agricultural purposes dating back from at least 1930’s, it is possible agricultural chemicals such as pesticides and fertilizers have likely been applied to crops grown on the Proposed Project Site. Through the adoption of the Mitigation and Monitoring Program within the Conditions of Approval for the Project, any hazards that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the conversion of agricultural land to residential uses will be significantly reduced to create a safe, healthy environment. Additionally, plans for the proposed residential development will be required to be submitted and approved through Site Plan and Design Review process.

Additionally, the Zoning, Fire, and Building Codes will ensure that that the development of the project will meet applicable safety standards.

Therefore, it is found that with the incorporation of the above mentioned Mitigation Measures, Conditions of Approval, and the requirements of the Zoning, Fire, and Building Codes will ensure the protection of the public health, safety and welfare.

4. Proper on-site traffic circulation (e.g., pedestrian and vehicular) and control is designed into the development to ensure protection for fire suppression and police surveillance equal to or better than what would normally be created by compliance with the minimum setback and parcel width standards identified in Article 2 (Zones, Allowable Land Uses, and Zone Specific Standards);
The proposed Planned Development Permit incorporates a comprehensive internal circulation system designed to accommodate both vehicular and pedestrian traffic while ensuring adequate access for emergency response and Resolution No. 4141

Page 11 of 18 ends

public safety services. The Project has been reviewed for compliance with applicable City standards and the requirements of the City Engineer, Riverside County Fire Department, and Sheriff’s Department.

The internal street network is designed to provide efficient circulation and connectivity throughout the Project site. Roadway widths, including minimum 24- foot fire access lanes where applicable, and turning radii have been designed to accommodate emergency vehicles, service vehicles, and passenger traffic.

The interconnected street system enhances accessibility for fire suppression and law enforcement response.

Pedestrian circulation is supported through sidewalks, paseos, and connections to on-site parks and adjacent improvements, including the Class I multi-use trail along Esplanade Avenue. These features promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement throughout the community.

Based on the foregoing, the Project provides proper on-site traffic circulation and control for both vehicular and pedestrian movement and ensures protection for fire suppression and police services equal to or better than that which would be achieved through strict compliance with standard
development requirements.

5. The subject parcel is adequate in terms of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development;
The proposed Project Site is generally flat and is shaped to accommodate a proper lot layout. Section 17.620.020 of the Development Code states that the minimum lot size for a Planned Development Permit is 2 acres. The proposed Project site greatly exceeds this requirement and is 73.06-net acres. The proposed Project will provide an efficient use of land that will meet the purpose and intent of the Low Density Residential (LDR) General Plan land use designation by modifying the development standards to accommodate a 2-7 dwelling unit per acre development as required by the 2024 General Plan.

Therefore, the subject parcel is adequate in terms of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development.

6. Adequate public services and facilities exist, or will be provided, in compliance with the conditions of approval, to serve the proposed development and the approval of the proposed development will not result in a reduction of public services to properties in the vicinity to be a detriment to public health, safety, and general welfare; Adequate public services and facilities exist, or will be provided, to serve the proposed development. The Project has been reviewed by applicable City departments and service providers, including Public Works, Public Utilities, Sheriff’s Department, and Riverside County Fire Department, to ensure that the development can be adequately served.

Utility services, including potable water, wastewater, electricity, natural gas, telecommunications, and solid waste services, are available within the vicinity of the Project site or will be extended to serve the development. Eastern Resolution No. 4141

Page 12 of 18 ends

Municipal Water District has indicated its willingness and ability to provide water and wastewater service to the Project.

The Project will be conditioned to ensure that all required infrastructure improvements are constructed and that service connections and applicable fees are provided prior to occupancy. Emergency access and response capabilities have been incorporated into the Project design and will be subject to review and approval by the appropriate agencies.

Based on the foregoing, adequate public services and facilities exist, or will be provided, to serve the Project, and the proposed development will not result in a reduction of service levels to surrounding properties.

7. The proposed development, as conditioned, will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding property or their allowed use; The proposed development will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding properties or their allowed uses. The Project is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations of the surrounding area and represents a logical extension of existing and planned residential development.

The Project has been designed to be compatible with adjacent uses through site planning, building placement, and the incorporation of landscaping, open space, and internal circulation. The transition from the Project site to surrounding properties is appropriate for the area, whether adjacent lands remain in agricultural use or develop in accordance with the General Plan.

The Project is subject to Conditions of Approval and compliance with applicable Municipal Code requirements, including noise, lighting, and traffic standards, as well as the California Building Code and Fire Code. These requirements are intended to prevent nuisances and ensure that the development does not create adverse impacts on surrounding properties.

Based on the foregoing, the proposed development, as conditioned, will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding property or their allowed use.

8. If the development proposes to mix residential and commercial uses whether done in a vertical or horizontal manner, the residential use is designed in a manner that it is appropriately buffered from the commercial use and is provided sufficiently enhanced amenities to create a comfortable and healthy residential environment and to provide a positive quality of life for the residents. The enhanced amenities may include additional landscaping, additional private open space, private or separated entrances, etc;
The Project does not propose a mix of residential and commercial uses as the project does not include Commercial uses.

9. The design, location, operating characteristics, and size of the proposed development will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity, in terms of aesthetic values, character, scale, and view protection; and
Resolution No. 4141

Page 13 of 18 ends

This project will have the appropriate buffers such as exterior walls and perimeter landscaping to ensure that it will be compatible with any future land use whether it remains agricultural, develops with Residential, Commercial or a project that integrates both, in accordance with the General Plan.

10.The applicant agrees in writing to comply with any and all of the conditions imposed by the review authority in the approval of the Planned Development Permit.

The Applicant has agreed with all of the conditions imposed by the review authority prior to the issuance of any permits or recordation of any documents.

SUBDIVISION (TTM 39076):

1. The proposed subdivision of land has been found to be consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the San Jacinto Municipal Code.

The proposed Tentative Tract Map (TTM 39076) is consistent with the San Jacinto Municipal Code and has been reviewed in accordance with the applicable provisions of Titles 16 and 17. The Project includes a Planned Development Permit to allow limited, controlled modifications to the development standards of the Residential Low Density (RL) zone, which are intended to facilitate a cohesive and well-designed residential community.

Upon approval of the General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone, the Project will be consistent with the Low Density Residential (LDR) General Plan land use designation and the corresponding RL zoning designation. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the permitted density range and establishes a logical and orderly pattern of residential development.

The Project implements applicable General Plan goals and policies, including:
• Land Use Goal 2 and Policies LU-2.1 and LU-2.2, by promoting orderly and coordinated growth that is compatible with surrounding residential neighborhoods and supported by an interconnected circulation network and accessible open space; and
• Land Use Goal 3 and Policies LU-3.1 and LU-3.2, by facilitating high-quality residential development that is compatible with adjacent land uses and incorporates design features that enhance neighborhood character and connectivity.

Based on the foregoing, the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and Municipal Code.

2. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the Resolution No. 4141

Page 14 of 18 ends

resulting parcels following division of the land will be of an adequate size to sustain their agricultural use
The project site is not subject to a contract pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 as detailed in the analysis completed through the Mitigated Negative Declaration document. In addition, the projects title report did not have indication of a Williamson Act Contract.

3. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map.

The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed subdivision of 419 single-family residential lots. The proposed use is consistent with the Residential Low Density (RL) zoning designation and the Low Density Residential (LDR) General Plan land use designation, which permits residential development within the proposed density range.

The site is of sufficient size and configuration to accommodate the proposed subdivision, including residential lots, internal circulation, and open space areas. The Project represents a logical expansion of existing and planned residential development in the surrounding area, including neighborhoods to the north, east, and west.

The Project site has access to existing and planned infrastructure necessary to support the proposed development, including potable water, wastewater, natural gas, and electrical services, which are available within adjacent roadways. The site is also located in proximity to existing community amenities, including parks and schools, which support the residential character of the Project.

Based on the foregoing, the site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed.

4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are either:
a. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; or
An Initial Study was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate potential environmental impacts. The Initial Study determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment, including impacts to biological resources such as fish and wildlife and their habitat.

All mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study have been incorporated into the Project and will be implemented through the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Accordingly, the design Resolution No. 4141

Page 15 of 18 ends

of the subdivision and proposed improvements is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
b. An environmental impact report under which a finding has been made pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3) that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

The project’s impacts were not significant enough to require the preparation of an environmental impact report. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project to assess any significant environmental impacts, and it was determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental document.

Therefore, findings pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3) are not necessary.

5. The design of the subdivision of land and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems.

The implementation of the proposed conditions will ensure that the Project will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City or the future residents of the development. As previously mentioned, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the proposed subdivision, which analyzed items that can cause public health problems such as Air Quality, Hazardous Materials, and Utilities. It was determined through the environmental document that with incorporation of mitigation measures, the impacts to public health problems would be less than significant

6. That design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.

The design of the subdivision will provide for future passive cooling opportunities with the implementation of building setbacks, lot coverage requirements, landscaping requirements, including required street trees, and open space areas. This can also include configuration to permit orientation of a structure to take advantage of shade and prevailing breezes. Furthermore, natural heating opportunities can be provided with orientation of a structure in an east-west alignment for southern exposure.

The proposed project is a subdivision and Planned Development Permit, subsequent development will be analyzed and conditioned through a Site Plan and Design Review. As part of the Site Plan and Design Review process, the Planning Department will ensure that natural heating and cooling opportunities are explored to the extent feasible and condition the project accordingly.

Resolution No. 4141

Page 16 of 18 ends

7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided.

Per the title report provided by the project applicant, the site consists of two easements for a right-of-way over a strip of land 30 feet wide located outside the property line on Cawston Avenue. The second easement is granted to Easter Municipal Water District for sewage transmission and collection facilities. This easement is located outside the property lines along Cawston Avenue. These two easements are shown in the Tentative Tract Map and will not conflict with the development of the proposed Project.

8. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (per the Quimby Act), as applicable, in accordance with Chapter 16.75 (Parkland Dedication and Fees).

The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements pursuant to Chapter 16.75 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code. The Project provides approximately 3.26 acres of usable parkland within designated park lots, which contributes toward satisfying the City’s parkland dedication requirement.

Any remaining parkland obligation will be satisfied through the payment of in-lieu fees, in accordance with Chapter 16.75, as required by the Conditions of Approval.

Based on the foregoing, the Project complies with the City’s parkland dedication requirements.

SECTION 3. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds the Application complies with CEQA for the following reasons:

An environmental analysis has been conducted which evaluated information and impacts based on the specifics of this proposed project. This analysis determined that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and other effects will be mitigated to a level of less than significant impact. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation Monitoring Plan is recommended.

SECTION 4. The location and custodian of the documents and any other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council based its decision is as follows: Community Development Director, City of San Jacinto Planning Department, 595 San Jacinto Ave, San Jacinto, CA 92583. (909) 487-7330.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.

Resolution No. 4141

Page 17 of 18 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED the 21st Day of July 2026 by the following vote.

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
_______________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
__________________________
Craig Hayes, City Attorney
Resolution No. 4141

Page 18 of 18 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS

CITY OF SAN JACINTO)
I, Julia Espinoza, duly appointed City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 4141 was duly passed, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the 21st day of July 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Witness my hand and seal the 21st day of July 2026.
_____________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 1 of 58 ends

Approval Date: TBD
Effective Date: TBD
Expiration Date: TBD
PROJECT LOCATION: West site of Cawston Avenue extending between Seventh Street and Esplanade Avenue San Jacinto, CA APN: 432-260-009, 432-260-026, 432-260-027 APPLICANT: Chacon, LLC
2451 Ramona Expressway
San Jacinto, CA 92582
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:

Applicant (signature) Date

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A General Plan Amendment from Very Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential; a Change of Zone from Rural Residential to Residential Low Density; approval of a Planned Development Permit and Tentative Tract Map 39076 to subdivide three parcels into 419 single-family residential lots on approximately 73.97 gross acres, including on-site roadways, parks, a detention basin, and landscaping.

General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 2 of 58 ends

General Requirements & Information
A. To the extent permitted by law the applicant/licensee shall by accepting these conditions agree to defend (with legal counsel of City’s selection), indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its elected and appointed officials, agents, attorneys, employees and officers, from any action, claim or proceeding brought by any party other than the applicant/licensee against the City or its elected and appointed officials, agents, employees and officers to attack, set aside, void, or annul a discretionary land use approval of the City, which action is brought within the applicable statute of limitations. The required indemnification shall include damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys’ fees and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the action. The City shall promptly notify the applicant/licensee of any such claim, action, or proceeding and cooperate fully in the defense.

B. The residential subdivision shall comply with all required development standards of the Development Code and the Planned Development Permit (PDP). When a conflict between the Development Code and the PDP exists, the PDP standards will supersede the Development Code
C. An SB 330 Preliminary Application was submitted for this development and became effective on March 31, 2025 (the “Vesting Date”), which is the date the applicant submitted a complete application pursuant to Government Code Section 65941.1. The City will utilize the development standards and fees in effect on March 31, 2025.

D. The residential subdivision shall comply with the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Section 66410 et seq.) and Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the Municipal Code.

E. The effective date of Tentative Tract Map 39076 is ten (10) days following the approval date. The approval will lapse if a final map has not recorded within three (3) years from the date upon which the approval was granted. Unless a time extension is approved by the City’s applicable review authority, applications for time extensions must be received prior to the expiration date. The filing of a final map for phase 1 of the Tentative Tract Map shall extend the life of the remaining portion of the Tentative Tract Map consistent with Government Code section 66452.6. The Tentative Tract Map may be recorded in phases in a manner consistent with the phasing map.

Page 3 of 58 ends

F. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay any outstanding planning application or processing fees within ten (10) days of City’s request therefore and prior to permits being exercised. Failure to do so will be grounds for Code Enforcement actions, revocation, or further legal action.

G. The Project shall fully and continually comply with all applicable conditions of approval, State, Federal, and local laws in effect at the time the permit is approved and exercised, and which may become effective and applicable thereafter.

Failure to do so will be grounds for Code Enforcement actions, revocation, or further legal action.

H. This permit shall run with the land associated to the project/permit and continues to be valid upon change of ownership. All applicable conditions of approval shall continue to apply with a change in property ownership.

I. All plans submitted to the City shall be in substantial conformance with the plans in this approval as conditioned. This condition applies to site plans, grading plans, landscape plans, building plans, elevations, and all other illustrations, text, or plans submitted to the City in connection with the Project.

J. The approved entitlement cannot be legally conducted on the subject property until all applicable conditions of approval have been met to the satisfaction of the Planning Department.

K. The applicant shall be subject to all applicable development fees. Such fees may include, but not be limited to Development Impact Fees, Park Fees, School Fees, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees, and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fees.

L. Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 17.335 – Sign Regulations of the Development Code in effect on the Vesting Date. Any signs, including exterior-mounted, monument, and window signs, shall be subject to separate review and assessment. A separate sign application, including fees and additional sets of plans, will be necessary prior to sign permit issuance.

M. The City shall have the right to inspect the site and facilities to ensure compliance with the conditions of approval and to recover its actual costs related to such inspections from the property owner or tenant.

Page 4 of 58 ends

N. Site Plan and Design Review (SPDR) for construction of the dwelling units shall ensure that all lumber scraps, combustible materials, and other debris be picked up daily, or more often as required by the Building and Safety Division.

O. All existing and new utilities adjacent to and on the Project site shall be located underground as per City of San Jacinto Municipal Code Section 15.32.

P. In the event of a conflict between any conditions for this approval, the most restrictive regulations shall apply.

Q. The contractor shall comply with the following best practices during the construction phase of the development. o The erection (including excavation), demolition, alteration or repair of any building shall occur between the hours of seven a.m. and seven p.m. on weekdays and Saturdays, and between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays, except when such work complies with the terms of a temporary use permit which may be issued by the community development director or his or her designee, upon a showing of sufficient need due to hot or inclement weather, or the use of an unusually long process material, or other circumstances of unusual and compelling nature.
o During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for the project construction shall utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. o During the entire active construction period, stationary noise sources shall be located as far from sensitive receptors as possible, and they shall be incorporated to the extent feasible. o Select haul routes that avoid the greatest amount of sensitive use areas. Avoid soil hauling through residential areas.
o Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on-site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes.

Page 5 of 58 ends

o Equipment shall be maintained and operated such that loads are secured from rattling or banging.

R. A copy of all pages of these Conditions shall be included in the construction drawing packages for grading plans and building permits, including landscaping permits.

S. During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise-producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level, or switch off back-up alarms and replace them with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws.

T. A grading permit shall be obtained from the City of San Jacinto prior to the commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained Road right-of-way.

U. The Project is required to comply with San Jacinto Development Code Section 17.300.080 which requires all exterior lighting to be shielded or modified and located so as to eliminate spillover illumination or glare beyond the property line or upward into the sky.

Page 6 of 58 ends

Engineering Department General Requirements & Information V. With respect to the Conditions of Approval for the above referenced project, the City of San Jacinto requires that the developer/property owner provides the following street improvements and/or road dedications in accordance with the City of San Jacinto Municipal Code. It is understood that the site plan correctly shows all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, rights-of-way, and drainage courses with appropriate Q’s and their omission may require the site plan to be resubmitted for further consideration. These ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complimentary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvements. Unless otherwise noted, all offsite improvements as conditioned shall be installed prior to issuance of any occupancy permits. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the City Engineer’s office. In the event of a conflict between any conditions stated below, those imposed by Planning Department and others, and requirements identified in the approved Traffic impact Analysis, the most stringent in the opinion of the City shall prevail.

W. The project grading shall be in a manner to perpetuate existing natural patterns. Any deviation from this, concentration or increase in runoff must have approval of adjacent property owners and City Engineer. The developer/property owner shall accept the offsite runoff and convey to acceptable outlet.

X. Prior to commencement of any construction or installation of fencing in public right-of-way, an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer’s office.

Y. The developer/property owner shall secure City’s and appropriate agencies’ clearances and approvals of the improvement plans.

Page 7 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Planning 1) The Final Map shall accurately depict the Typical Rear Yard sections within the PDP. ☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Planning
2) The developer/applicant shall prepare CC&R’s for City review and approval. The CC&R’s shall include a provision for maintenance of the common spaces within the subdivision and shall include a provision allowing the increase of fees to ensure continued maintenance of all common and public areas in the event any assessment district is reduced or eliminated. A Homeowners Association (HOA) shall be established to enforce the CC&Rs, and to provide ongoing maintenance of the parking areas, park, basins and landscaped areas.
☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering 3) A final map shall be filed for review and approval and shall be recorded. ☐ Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering
4) The developer/property owner shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreement, and posted securities for the public improvements.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 8 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering 5) A total of 52 feet (52’) shall be dedicated for all interior streets within Phase 1 and will be privately maintained. ☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering 6) A total of 56 feet (56’) shall be dedicated for Street “A”, a privately maintained street. ☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering 7) A total of 80 feet (80’) shall be dedicated for the Street “K” entry, a privately maintained street. ☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering
8) Seventh Street is classified as a Major per the City General Plan. A 30- foot wide halfwidth right-of-way is currently dedicated along the property’s northerly frontage. The developer/property owner shall dedicate the required additional 20 feet (20’) of right-of-way to provide for a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way.
☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering
9) Cawston Avenue is classified as a Major per the City General Plan. A 30- foot wide halfwidth right-of-way is currently dedicated along the property’s easterly frontage. The developer/property owner shall dedicate the required additional 20 feet (20’) of right-of-way to provide for a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 9 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering 10)Property line corner cutbacks shall be dedicated per County of Riverside Standard No. 805.
☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering
11)All easements and/or public street rights-of-way shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agencies in perpetuity and shall continue in force until the City or the appropriate agency accepts or abandons such offers.
☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering
12)The developer/property owner shall sign the consent and waiver form to join the City’s Flood Control District as appropriate. The proposed streetlights and traffic signals shall be maintained by the City and cost paid by the developer/property owner through the said annexation. ☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering
13)The developer/property owner shall submit the following to the City Engineer for review and approval:
• Street Improvement Plans
• Street Light Plans prepared by a registered Electrical Engineer • Signing and Striping, Traffic Signal Plans as appropriate • Onsite Grading and Erosion Control Plans – Plans shall show the approved WDID No.
• Geotechnical Report (for reference)
• Sewer and Water Plans
• Storm Drain Improvement Plans
• Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis
• Final WQMP (for reference) including WDID No.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 10 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 1) Met? • Traffic Signal Plan
The design shall comply with Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Fire Department, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCD), Riverside County Transportation Department, Caltrans, City of San Jacinto and ADA most recent standards, criteria, and requirements and in effect at the time of construction and shall be coordinated with the approved plans of the adjacent developments.

Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Engineering
14)The following statement shall be added to the Final Map:

NOTICE OF DRAINAGE FEES – Notice is hereby given that this property is located in San Jacinto Valley Area Drainage Plan which was adopted by the City of San Jacinto pursuant to Ordinance 13-01 and Section 66001, et seq, of the Government Code and that said property is subject to fees for said drainage area. Notice is further given that, pursuant to Ordinance 13-01, payment of the drainage fees shall be paid to the City of San Jacinto prior to issuance of the building permit for a parcel, and that the property owner shall pay the fee required at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit.
☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Special Districts
15)Establish a funding mechanism for the maintenance of public improvements.
• One such mechanism is annexation into the Public Facilities Maintenance Community Facilities District (CFD) is an option to fulfill the funding requirement for maintenance of public improvements. If a property owner opts to annex into a CFD, the annexation must be finalized in order to satisfy this condition. ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 11 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 1
Special Districts
16)Establish a funding mechanism for the public safety services. • One such mechanism is annexation into the Public Safety Community Facilities Districts (CFD) is an option to fulfill the funding requirement for public safety services.

Funding of services under the City’s CFDs will consist of an annual assessment based on the costs of such services, as determined by a City’s Engineer’s Estimate and established by tax zone.
☐
Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 2) Met? Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 2
Engineering 17)A final map for phase 2 shall be filed for review and approval and shall be recorded. ☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 2
Engineering
18)The developer/property owner shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreement, and posted securities for the public improvements.
☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 2
Engineering 19)A total of 52 feet (52’) shall be dedicated for all interior streets withing phase 2. Interior Streets will be privately maintained. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 12 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 2) Met? Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 2
Engineering
20)Esplanade Avenue is classified as an Arterial per the City General Plan. A 56-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way is currently dedicated along the property’s southerly frontage. The developer/property owner shall dedicate the required additional 17 feet (17’) of right-of-way to provide for a 73-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way with Phase 2.
☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 2
Engineering
21)Property line corner cutbacks shall be dedicated per County of Riverside Standard No. 805. ☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 2
Engineering
22)All easements and/or street rights-of-way shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agencies in perpetuity and shall continue in force until the City or the appropriate agency accepts or abandons such offers.
☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 2
Engineering
23)The developer/property owner shall sign the consent and waiver form to join the City’s Lighting and Landscape Districts and City’s Flood Control District as appropriate. The proposed streetlights and traffic signals shall be maintained by the City and cost paid by the developer/property owner through the said annexation.
☐
Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 2
Engineering
24)The developer/property owner shall submit the following to the City Engineer for review and approval:
• Street Improvement Plans
• Street Light Plans prepared by a registered Electrical Engineer • Signing and Striping, Traffic Signal Plans as appropriate • Onsite Grading and Erosion Control Plans – Plans shall show the ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 13 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 2) Met? approved WDID No.
• Geotechnical Report (for reference)
• Storm Drain Improvement Plans
• Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis
• Final WQMP (for reference) including WDID No.
• Traffic Signal Plan
The design shall comply with Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Fire Department, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCD), Riverside County Transportation Department, Caltrans, City of San Jacinto and ADA most recent standards, criteria, and requirements and in effect at the time of construction and shall be coordinated with the approved plans of the adjacent developments.

Prior to
Recordation of
the Final Map
Phase 2
Engineering
25)The following statement shall be added to the Final Map:

Page 14 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department
Prior to a Specific Date Met?
30-days Prior to
Grading Planning
26)Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Surveys.

The Project Applicant shall retain a qualified Biologist to conduct a preconstruction survey for burrowing owl on the Proposed Project Site (and including adjacent areas within 500 feet to the extent possible) within 30 days prior to construction. Methods for the pre-construction surveys shall be conducted as a one-day focused survey following the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP 2006). Following the survey, the Biologist shall prepare a Memorandum/Letter Report describing the methods and results of the survey for submittal to the City. If burrowing owl are observed, the Report shall also make recommendations for avoidance and minimization measures depending on the timing of construction and the location of the active burrow with respect to planned activities.

If burrowing owl are observed, the Project Applicant (or their designee) shall contact the City to discuss avoidance and minimization options.

During the breeding season (i.e., March 1 to August 31), restrictions shall be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active burrow until the burrow is no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist. The protective buffer shall be 500 feet (or as otherwise approved by the City) around the active burrow. The protective buffer shall be flagged clearly in the field, mapped as an “Environmentally Sensitive Area,” and the maps provided to the Project Applicant, their designee (e.g., Construction Supervisor), and the City. During the wintering season, an active burrow may be closed following CDFW-approved procedures with permission from the City. If the wintering burrow would not be directly impacted, a protective buffer of 160 feet (or as otherwise approved by the City) shall be placed around the burrow. The protective buffer shall be flagged clearly in the field, mapped as an “Environmentally Sensitive Area,” and the maps ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 15 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department
Prior to a Specific Date Met?
provided to the Project Applicant, their designee (e.g., Construction Supervisor), and the City. The Project Applicant shall not proceed with construction until the avoidance and minimization measures have been approved by the City and all appropriate protections are in place.

Three days prior
to Grading Planning
27)Mitigation Measure BIO-2. Nesting Bird Survey. To the extent possible, vegetation removal will be conducted during the non-breeding season (September 12 to January 31)1 in order to minimize direct impacts on nesting birds and raptors. If construction activities would be initiated during the peak breeding season for nesting birds/raptors (February 1–June 30), a preconstruction survey will be conducted by a qualified Biologist within three days prior to the initiation of construction (including demolition of structures). The nesting bird/raptor survey area will include a buffer of 100 feet around the work area for nesting birds and a buffer of 500 feet around the work area for nesting raptors. This survey can be combined with the pre-construction burrowing owl survey described in MM BIO-1. If the Biologist does not find any active nests in or immediately adjacent to the impact area, construction activities can proceed.

If the Biologist detects an active nest within or immediately adjacent to the construction area and determines that the nest may be impacted, or breeding activities substantially disrupted by increased activity around the nest, the Biologist will determine an appropriate protective buffer around the nest depending on the sensitivity of the species and the nature of the construction activity. The protective buffer shall be between 25 to 100 feet for nesting birds and 300 to 500 feet for nesting raptors. No work will be allowed within the protective buffer until nesting activity has ended, as determined by a qualified Biologist. Any protective buffers will be flagged clearly in the field, mapped as “Environmentally Sensitive Areas,” and the maps provided to the Project Applicant, their designee (e.g., Construction ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 16 of 58 ends

Supervisor), and the City. Construction can proceed within the protective buffer when the qualified Biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active (i.e., fledglings have left the nest, or the nest has failed).

Page 17 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
28)A grading permit shall be obtained from the City of San Jacinto prior to the commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road rightof-way. ☐ Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
29)A copy of all pages of these Conditions shall be included in the construction drawing packages for grading plans. ☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
30)All imported soils/fill shall be tested to ensure Contaminants of Concern (COC’s) meet the applicable screening levels as outlined in DTSC’s Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual. The applicant/developer shall provide the following to the Planning Department for review:
a. Report of testing performed.
b. Documentation of the origins of the soil/fill material, if applicable, sampling be conducted to ensure that the imported soil/fill material are suitable for the intended land use.
c. The soil sampling should include analysis based on the source of the soil/fill and knowledge of prior land use.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
31)Mitigation Measure BIO-3. Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Fee. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall pay the MSHCP mitigation fee as directed by the City of San Jacinto based on the most current rates.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 18 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
32)Mitigation Measure BIO-4. MSHCP Construction Minimization Measures. The Project Applicant and their designee (i.e., Construction Contractors) shall follow required MSHCP Construction Minimization Measures (Section 7.5.3 of the MSHCP). Applicable construction minimization measures are listed below.

Plans for water pollution and erosion control will be prepared for all Discretionary Projects involving the movement of earth in excess of 50 cubic yards. The plans will describe sediment and hazardous materials control, dewatering or diversion structures, fueling and equipment management practices, use of plant material for erosion control. Plans will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction.

Timing of construction activities will consider seasonal requirements for breeding birds and migratory non-resident species. Habitat clearing will be avoided during species active breeding season defined as March 1 to June 30.

Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented until such time soils are determined to be successfully stabilized. ☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
33)Mitigation Measure CUL-1. Archaeological Monitor. The Project proponent shall retain a Project Archaeologist prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities to monitor ground-disturbing activities occurring within native sediment (in situ material).

In the event that archaeological resources are discovered at the Proposed Project Site, the handling of the discovered resources shall occur, as described below. All artifacts discovered shall be inventoried and analyzed by the Project Archaeologist. If any artifacts of Native American ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 19 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
origin are discovered, all activities in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 50-foot radius) shall stop, and the Project Archaeologist shall notify the property owner and tribes identified by the NAHC as being affiliated with the area. The Project Archaeologist and Tribal Representative will analyze the Native American artifacts for identification as everyday life and/or religious or sacred items, cultural affiliation, temporal placement, and function, as deemed possible. The significance of Native American resources shall be evaluated in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and shall consider the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the affiliated tribes. All items found in association with Native American human remains shall be considered grave goods or sacred in origin and subject to special handling.

Non-Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. After analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the property owner, as deemed appropriate.

Once grading activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency and Tribal Representative, determines that monitoring is no longer necessary, monitoring activities can be discontinued. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered artifacts, shall be prepared upon completion of the steps outlined above. A copy of the report shall also be filed with the EIC.

Page 20 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading
Permit
Planning
34)Mitigation Measure CUL-2. Discovery of Human Remains. All discovered human remains shall be treated with respect and dignity.

California State law (California Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5) and federal law and regulations ([Archaeological Resources Protection Act 16 United States Code (USC) 470 & 43 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 7], [Native American Graves Protection & Repatriation Act 25 USC 3001 & 43 CFR 10] and [Public Lands, Interior 43 CFR 8365.1–7]) require a defined protocol if human remains are discovered in the State of California regardless of whether the remains are modern or archaeological in origin.

If human remains, grave goods, ceremonial items, and/or sacred items are encountered, work will immediately halt within the immediate area and any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains, and a 100-foot ESA boundary will be established to protect the find from impact, and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the City of San Jacinto Planning Division shall be immediately notified.

In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e), if human remains are found, the Riverside County Coroner’s office shall be notified by the permittee within 24 hours of the discovery. County Coroner’s determination regarding the origin of the remains and any required notification is described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). No further excavation or disturbance of the potential human remains, or any area reasonably suspected to overlie additional remains, shall occur until a determination has been made, any notifications have been sent and received, and the Riverside County Coroner’s Office has cleared the site. ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 21 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
35)Mitigation Measure GEO-1. Paleontological Treatment Plan. In the event that potential paleontological resources are discovered during grounddisturbing activities, work will stop in that area and within 30 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can assess the significance of the find and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures. Treatment measures may include monitoring by a qualified paleontologist during construction-related ground- disturbing activities. The monitor will retain the option to reduce monitoring if it is determined that the sediments were previously disturbed. Monitoring may also be reduced if potentially fossiliferous units are not present or, if present, are determined to have a low potential to contain fossil resources. The monitor will be equipped to salvage fossils and samples of sediments as they are unearthed and will be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Recovered specimens will be prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. Specimens will be curated into a professional, accredited museum repository with permanent retrievable storage. A report of findings, with an appended itemized inventory of specimens, will be prepared and will signify completion of the mitigation.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 22 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
36)Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Prior to grading permit issuance, the developer shall enter into a Treatment and Disposition Agreement (TDA) with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to address treatment and disposition of archaeological, or Tribal Cultural Resources and human remains associated with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians that may be uncovered or otherwise discovered during ground-disturbing activities related to the project, if monitoring deemed necessary by Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians. The TDA will establish provisions for tribal monitoring and shall be submitted to the Planning Division once it has been executed. ☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
37)If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which will determine the identity of and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD must complete the inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. If human remains, grave goods, ceremonial items, and/or sacred items are encountered, work will immediately halt within the immediate area and any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains, and a 100-foot ESA boundary will be established to protect the find from impact, and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the City of San Jacinto Planning Division shall be immediately notified.

In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e), if human remains are found, the Riverside County Coroner’s office shall be notified by the permittee within 24 hours of the discovery. County Coroner’s determination regarding the origin of the remains and any required notification is described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 23 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Safety Code and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). No further excavation or disturbance of the potential human remains, or any area reasonably suspected to overlie additional remains, shall occur until a determination has been made, any notifications have been sent and received, and the Riverside County Coroner’s Office has cleared the site.

Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
38)The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the take (including killing, capturing, selling, trading, and transport) of protected migratory bird species without prior authorization by the Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The list of migratory bird species protected by the law is primarily based on bird families and species included in the four international conservation treaties that the U.S. entered into with Canada in 1916, Mexico in 1936, Japan in 1972, and Russia in 1976. The list of birds protected under the law can be found under Title 50 Part 10.13 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Additionally, California Fish and Game Code Section 3503.5 states that it is “unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the order Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds of prey) or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by this code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto.” California Fish and Game Code Section 3511 prohibits the taking of any bird listed as fully protected and Section 3515 states that is it unlawful to take any non-game migratory bird protected under the MBTA. ☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
39)A copy of all pages of these Conditions shall be included in the construction drawing packages for grading plans.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 24 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
40)The proposed site design BMPs selected for this project have been approved in concept. The project shall submit a Final Addendum WQMP including plans and details providing the elevations and slopes of the three bioretention basins and other details for the proposed structural BMPs.

The Public Works Department shall review and approve the Final WQMP document, plans and details. The Public Works Department shall review and approve the Final WQMP document, plans and details. ☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
41)The development shall be subject to all provisions of City of San Jacinto Municipal Code Chapter 13.44, which establishes Urban Stormwater Runoff Management and discharge controls to improve Water Quality and comply with Federal/State Regulations and any subsequent amendments, revisions or ordinances pertaining thereto.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
42)A Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted and approved, including a project description, and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable.

The Water Quality Management Plan shall identify the structural and nonstructural measures consistent with the City’s adopted requirements. ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 25 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
43)The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.

Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger’s Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City for coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Construction Permit.

The applicant/developer shall provide documentation to the City for review.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Planning
44)The contractor shall provide a letter that agreeing to follow the City’s General Plan and Noise Ordinance. In addition, the letter shall indicate the contractor shall implement the following best practices during the construction phase of the development.
a. Limit construction to the daytime hours (7:00 AM to 7:00 PM) and prohibit construction on Sundays and holidays.
b. At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction on days and hours, as well as telephone numbers of the City’s and contractor’s authorized representative that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor’s representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report to the City.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 26 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
c. During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for the project construction shall utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible.
d. During the entire active construction period, stationary noise sources shall be located as far from sensitive receptors as possible, and they shall be incorporated to the extent feasible.
e. Select haul routes that avoid the greatest amount of sensitive use areas. Avoid soil hauling through residential areas.
f. Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on-site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes.
g. During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise-producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which, automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level or switch off backup alarms and replace them with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws.
h. No radios or other sound equipment shall be used at this site unless required for emergency response by the contractor.
i. The City shall require the developer to require that all construction equipment be operated with mandated noise control equipment (mufflers or silencers). Enforcement will be accomplished by random General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 27 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
field inspections by applicant personnel during construction activities. j. Equipment not in use for five minutes shall be shut off. k. Equipment shall be maintained and operated such that loads are secured from rattling or banging.
l. Construction employees shall be trained in the proper operation and use of equipment consistent with these mitigation measures, including no unnecessary revving of equipment.

The applicant / developer shall provide a letter from the contractor agreeing to implement this condition.
45)The developer shall comply with the following requirements to the satisfaction of the Building & Safety Division:
a. The site shall be watered on an on-going basis to control dust during construction and grading.

Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit
Building &
Safety /
Planning
b. There shall be regular street sweeping and clean up of adjacent streets to minimize the amount of dust put into the air from motor vehicle travel.
☐
c. Mud and dirt shall be removed from construction equipment and vehicles prior to leaving the site to ensure they do not spread dirt into the street.

An energy conservation plan showing compliance with Title 24 (Building Standards) of the California Administrative Code shall also be provided.

Page 28 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit
Building &
Safety /
Planning
46)Stored backfill material shall be covered with water resistant material during periods of heavy precipitation to reduce the potential for rainfall erosion of stored backfill material. If covering is not feasible, then measures such as the use of straw bales or sandbags shall be used to capture and hold eroded material on the project site for future cleanup. ☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit
Building &
Safety /
Planning
47)All exposed, disturbed soil (trenches, stored backfill, etc.) shall be sprayed with water or soil binders twice a day, or more frequently if fugitive dust is observed migrating from the project site during future construction activities.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 29 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit
Building &
Safety /
Planning
48)Prior to and during grading and construction, should an accidental release of a hazardous material occur, the following actions will be implemented:
a. Construction activities in the immediate area will be immediately stopped; appropriate regulatory agencies will be notified; immediate actions will be implemented to limit the volume and area impacted by the contaminant; the contaminated material, primarily soil, shall be collected and removed to a location where it can be treated or disposed of in accordance with the regulations in place at the time of the event; b. Any transport of hazardous waste from the property shall be carried out by a registered hazardous waste transporter; and testing shall be conducted to verify that any residual concentrations of the accidentally released material are below the regulatory remediation goal at the time of the event.

All of the above sampling or remediation activities related to the contamination will be conducted under the oversight of Riverside County Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Site Mitigation Unit (SMU). All of the above actions shall be documented and made available to the appropriate regulatory agencies prior to closure (a determination of the regulatory agency that a site has been remediated to a threshold that poses no hazard to humans) of the contaminated area.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Engineering
49)The developer/property owner shall have approved grading and improvement plans, executed grading agreement as directed by the City Engineer, and posted securities.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 30 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met?
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit Engineering
50)The developer/property owner shall submit the following plans and reports to the City Engineer for review and approval:
a. Onsite Grading and Erosion Control Plans – Plans shall show the approved WDID No.
b. Geotechnical Report (for reference)
c. Storm Drain Improvement Plans
d. Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis
e. Final WQMP (for reference) including WDID No.
f. Traffic Signal Plan
The design shall comply with, RCFCD, and City of San Jacinto, and ADA most recent standards, criteria, and requirement and in effect at the time of construction and shall be coordinated with the approved plans of the adjacent developments.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 31 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permit (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Planning
51)The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD rules, Rule 201 – Permit to Construct and Rule 203 – Permit to Operate by obtaining the proper permits from SCAQMD.

The applicant/developer shall provide documentation that these permits were obtained.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Planning
52)All plans submitted shall be in substantial conformance to the approved Planned Development Permit and Tentative Tract Map. This condition applies to site plans, grading plans, landscape plans, building plans, elevations, and all other illustrations, text, or plans submitted to the City in connection with the project.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Planning
53)Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with city standards and specifications. ☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Planning
54)Building permit plans shall be substantially consistent with plans approved through this entitlement, as determined by City Planning. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 32 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permit (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Planning
55)A Site Plan & Design Review plan shall be submitted and approved by the City. The design review shall be consistent with the Residential Development Design Regulations (Section 17.425.020) and other relevant sections of the Development Code. At a minimum it should consist of:
a. A precise grading plan with the plotting of homes, setbacks from property lines, paved areas, slopes, etc.;
b. Floor plans;
c. Architectural elevations (in color) of all sides;
d. Typical front yard landscaping;
e. Entry monumentation, and parkway landscape treatments; f. Wall and Fence Plan that includes a decorative block wall around the perimeter of the project and interior fencing; and
g. Common mailbox architectural treatment
Elevations of houses facing Esplanade Avenue, Cawston Avenue, and 7th Street shall be enhanced.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1 Planning
56)Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. Asbestos Containing Materials Survey. Prior to the disturbance of any suspect Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) during construction or demolition activities at the Proposed Project Site, a comprehensive survey shall be required to sample materials on-site and confirm the presence or absence of ACMs. If such materials are identified and need to be disturbed, repaired, or removed, a licensed abatement contractor shall be consulted further
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 33 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permit (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Planning
57)Mitigation Measure HAZ-2. Methane Testing. Prior to the issuance of building permits, methane testing shall be conducted by a licensed engineer, geologist, or registered environmental assessor, and as necessary, shall include measures to reduce concentrations of methane to an acceptable level.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Planning
58)The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall record a “Water Quality Management Plan and Urban Runoff BMP Transfer Access and Maintenance Agreement,” to provide public notice of the requirement to implement the approved Final project-specific WQMP and the maintenance requirements associated with the WQMP. The
developer/applicant or successor in interest shall ensure the following, pursuant to Section XII. I. of the 2010 NPDES Permit:

Field verification that structural Site Design, Source Control, and Treatment Control BMPs are designed, constructed and functional in accordance with the approved Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). City WQMP Inspector will be notified for required inspections during construction. ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 34 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permit (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Planning
59)Submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval.

The landscape plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect in conformance with Chapter 17.325 – Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation and Section 17.325.060 – Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package Requirements of the Development Code and the City Landscape Design Guidelines for review and approval by the City Landscape Architect. Plans should be submitted at least 30 days prior to the expected date of permit issuance. The Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package shall include:
a. A completed application packet provided by the City; b. The Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet, including the MAWA and ETWU; Note the ETo rate for San Jacinto is 56.8 per State guidelines.
c. The soils management report;
d. The landscape design plan;
e. The irrigation design plan;
c. The grading plan.
d. A completed application packet provided by the City; e. The Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet, including the MAWA ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 35 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permit (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Planning
60)Submit a Fence and Wall Plan for review that shows the following:
a. The developer will work with any adjacent property owners to remove existing walls/fencing (double walls are not permitted). b. The developer will show on the plans how they will connect to the existing wall located to the west. Proposed wall should be similar in color, material, pilaster size, and caps.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Planning
61)All-Electric Project Design. The developer/applicant shall design the residential units, common areas, recreation buildings, project amenities, and other permanent on-site facilities to operate on electrical power only, consistent with the assumptions evaluated in the Project’s Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and supporting Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy analysis. Compliance shall be demonstrated on applicable utility plans, improvement plans, and building plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, Building Official, and Planning Division prior to issuance of applicable permits.

Note: This Condition was added by Staff following the Planning Commission Hearing.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Building & Safety
62)The contract with demolition and construction contractors shall include the requirement that all materials that can be recycled shall be salvaged and recycled. This includes, but is not limited to, wood, metals, concrete, road base, and asphalt. The developer shall submit a recycling plan to the City for review and approval prior to the start of demolition/construction activities to accomplish this objective.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 36 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permit (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Riverside County
Fire Department
63)Residential Fire Sprinklers: Residential fire sprinklers are required in all one and two-family dwellings per the California Residential Code (CRC).

Plans must be submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal for review and be approved prior to installation. Reference CFC as amended by Health and Safety Code section 18938.5.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Riverside County
Fire Department
64)Phased Construction Access and Water Supply: If construction is phased, an approved phasing plan shall be approved by the Fire Department.

Each phase shall provide approved access and water supply for fire protection prior to any construction. Reference CFC as amended by Health and Safety Code section 18938.5.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Riverside County
Fire Department
65)Fire and Life Safety Requirements - Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Department reviews any subsequent submittals. These conditions will be based on California Fire Code (CFC), California Building Code (CBC), and related codes/standards adopted and amended at the time of construction plan submittal or as applicable pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 18938.5.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Riverside County
Fire Department
66)Fire Protection Water Supplies/Fire Flow - Minimum fire flow for the construction of all buildings is required per CFC Appendix B. Prior to building permit issuance for new construction, the applicant shall provide documentation to the Fire Department to show there exists a water system capable of delivering the required fire flow. Specific design features may increase or decrease the required fire flow. Reference CFC 507.3 as amended.

Will Serve Letters from the responsible water purveyor are required prior to a map recordation.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 37 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permit (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Riverside County
Fire Department
67)Fire Protection Water Supplies/Hydrants – The minimum number of fire hydrants required, as well as the location and spacing of fire hydrants, shall comply with the CFC Appendix C. Fire hydrants shall be located no more than 600 feet from all portions of the exterior of the building along an approved route from a fire apparatus access road. Where new water mains are extended along streets and hydrants are not needed for protection of structures, standard fire hydrants shall be provided as spacing not to exceed 1000 feet along streets for transportation hazards.

The size and number of outlets required for the approved fire hydrants are 4” x 2 ½”. Final fire hydrant locations shall be determined during the fire water plan review. Reference CFC as amended.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Riverside County
Fire Department
68)Tract Water Plans – If fire hydrants are required to be installed, applicant/developer shall furnish the water system fire hydrant plans to Fire Department for review and approval prior to building permit issuance.

Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and shall confirm hydrant type, location, spacing, and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed and approved by the local water authority, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for review and approval. Reference CFC as amended.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 38 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permit (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Riverside County
Fire Department
69)Fire Department Access - Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided within 300 feet of all exterior portions of buildings, unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of no less than 24 feet. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads exceeding 150 feet shall provide an approved turn around.

The minimum required turning radius of a fire apparatus access road is 38 feet outside radius and 14 feet inside radius. The construction of the fire apparatus access roads shall be all weather and capable of sustaining 75,000 lbs. Unless otherwise approved, the grade of a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed 16 percent and the cross slope shall not exceed 2.5 percent. The angles of approach and departure for fire apparatus access roads shall be a maximum of 6 percent grade change for 25 feet of approach/departure. Reference CFC as amended and Riverside County Fire Department Policies and Standards.

Fire Lane marking: Identification and marking of fire lanes, including curb details and signage, shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Department Standards as of the Vesting Date.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Riverside County
Fire Department
70)Fire Department Access Turn Around - Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with a bulb turnaround at the terminus measuring a minimum of 38 feet outside radius and 14 feet inside radius. Parallel parking around the perimeter of the bulb is acceptable provided the bulb outside turning radius is increased by 8 feet. In-lieu of a bulb, a hammer-head type turnaround is acceptable where the top of the “T” dimension is 120 feet with the stem in the center.

Additional turnaround designs may be acceptable as approved by the Fire Department. Reference CFC as amended and Riverside County Fire Department Policies and Standards as of the Vesting Date. ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 39 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permit (Phase 1) Met? Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Riverside County
Fire Department
71)Secondary Access - Additional fire apparatus access roads based on the potential for impairment by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, anticipated magnitude of a potential incident, or other factors that could limit access shall be required by the Fire Department.

Secondary access fire apparatus access roads shall provide independent egress/access for the area, as approved by the Fire Department.

Secondary access fire apparatus access roads shall be as remote as practical from the primary fire apparatus access road to reduce the possibility that both routes will be obstructed by a single emergency.

Additional fire apparatus access roads based on the potential for impairment by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, anticipated magnitude of a potential incident, or other factors that could limit access may be required by the Fire Department. Reference CFC as amended and Riverside County Fire Department Policies and Standards as of the Vesting Date.
☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Riverside County
Fire Department
72)Traffic Calming Devices - Requests for installation of traffic calming designs/devices on fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Reference CFC as amended. ☐ Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 1
Engineering
73)The developer/property owner shall submit to Building and Safety a compaction certification from the Soils Engineer in compliance with the approved geotechnical/soils report and the pad elevation certification from the Civil Engineer in compliance with the approved Precise Grading Plan. ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 40 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to Acceptance of Public Improvements (Phase 1 and 2) Met? Prior to
Acceptance of
Public
Improvements
Special Districts
74)Developer will ensure that funds are available for maintenance, in the event that improvements are completed, and ready for City takeover, PRIOR to levy collection.
a. The first installment of collected assessments is paid to the City in January of each year. In the event that takeover is requested before the first installment is paid to the City, the Developer will either:
i. Pay an advancement of funds for the months included from takeover to collection (amount to be set by cost estimate at annexation) OR
ii. Continue to maintain improvements until City has acquired enough funds to sustain maintenance or until first assessment installment is received, whichever is first.
☐
Prior to
Acceptance of
Public
Improvements
Special Districts
75)Upon acceptance and City take-over, developer will ensure that a minimum of one-year warranty is in place for landscape, irrigation, and basin integrity, inclusive pumps and mechanical equipment used for the maintenance of the improvements taken over.
☐
Prior to
Acceptance of
Public
Improvements
Special Districts
76)Parks and associated facilities shall be inspected by a Certified Access Specialist through the Division of the State Architect ensuring compliance with applicable state and federal construction-related accessibility standards. A copy of the disability access inspection certificate and the CASp inspection report shall be provided to the City. Any accessibility barriers documented will need to be remedied prior to acceptance of the park by the City.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 41 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Planning
77)The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit the following items for the landscape and irrigation development and maintenance:

The signed Landscape Certificate of Completion pursuant to Section

17.325.070– Certificate of Completion of the Development Code; The irrigation scheduling pursuant to Section 17.325.080 – Irrigation Scheduling of the Development Code;
The Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule pursuant to Section 17.325.090 – Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule of the Development Code; and
The Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis pursuant to Section 17.325.100 — Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis of the Development Code.

Pursuant to Section 17.325.150 – Maintenance of the Development Code, all installed landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continually maintained. Maintenance shall consist of regular watering, mowing, pruning, fertilizing, clearing of debris and weeds, monitoring for pests and disease, the removal and timely replacement of dead plants, and the repair and timely replacement of irrigation systems, and integrated architectural features.
☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Planning
78)The subdivider shall pay a fee for neighborhood and community park and recreation purposes according to the standards and formula contained in Title 16 – Subdivision Code, as applicable to each phase contemplated by the final map.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 42 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Planning
79)The developer shall pay all required Development Impact Fees (DIF) for parkland acquisition, parkland development, and park facilities in effect on the Vesting Date prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final inspection.at the time of permit issuance for each home. Upon the City’s acceptance of the completed parks, the developer will receive a refund of the applicable fees pursuant to Title 16 of the Municipal Code. The amount of the refund shall not exceed the actual cost of the parkland acquisition, parkland development, and park facilities, nor shall it exceed the amount of the fees initially paid. No cross-category credit or refund shall be provided.

The developer must provide documentation to the City demonstrating that the refunds do not exceed the actual costs incurred.
☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Building & Safety
80)The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. This Project shall be subject to payment of these fees prior certificate of occupancy unless exempted by the ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling ordinance and based on the Vesting Date (3/31/2025).
☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Building & Safety
81)Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such number plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which property fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background. ☐ Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
82)The following items need to be approved:
a. Approved WDID No.
b. Geotechnical Report (for reference)
c. Storm Drain Improvement Plans
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 43 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? d. Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis
e. Final WQMP (for reference) including WDID No.

Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
83)Construct all interior streets within Phase 1. Interior Streets shall be private with a full width of 52 feet to provide for 36 feet asphalt paving (using TI of 5.5 and PG 64-10), curb and gutter at 18 feet on both sides of centerline, an 8- foot parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6-sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside and Caltrans standards.

A 24-foot wide access shall be provided for Fire access at all times. Street parking shall be restricted to one side of the street.
☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
84)Construct Street “A” from 7
th Street to the southern edge of Street L. Street
A shall be private with a full width of 56 feet improved to provide for 36 feet asphalt paving (using TI of 5.5 and PG 64-10) , curb and gutter at 18 feet on both sides of centerline, a 10-foot parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6- sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside and Caltrans standards.

A 24-foot wide access shall be provided for Fire at all times. Street parking shall be restricted to one side of the street.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 44 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
85)Construct Street “K” from Cawston Avenue to the western edge of Street “A”. Street K shall be private with a full width of 80 feet improved to provide for 40 feet asphalt paving (using TI of 5.5 and PG 64-10) , curb and gutter at 20 feet on both sides of centerline, a 20-foot parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6-sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside and Caltrans standards. ☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
86)Seventh Street shall be improved to provide for a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way, asphalt paving (using a TI of 9.0 and PG 70-10), 8-inch curb and gutter 32 feet south of centerline, a Class II: Buffered Bike Lane per the City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan, and an 18-foot wide parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6-foot sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and Caltrans standards.

If the existing pavement is in good condition the developer/property owner may use grind and overlay technique as determined by the City Engineer. ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 45 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
87)Cawston Avenue shall be improved to provide for a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way, asphalt paving (using a TI of 9.0 and PG 70-10), 8-inch curb and gutter 32 feet west of centerline, a Class II: Buffered Bike Lane per the City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan, and an 18-foot wide parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6-foot sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and Caltrans standards.

If the existing pavement is in good condition the developer/property owner may use grind and overlay technique as determined by the City Engineer. ☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
88)A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and Seventh Street. The intersection shall be improved to accommodate the required vehicular travel lanes and pedestrian crossings as recommended by the project’s traffic engineer and as directed by the City Engineer.

Note: This Condition was added by Staff following the Planning Commission Hearing.
☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
89)This Property is located in the San Jacinto Valley Area Drainage Plan which was adopted by the City of San Jacinto pursuant to Ordinance 13-01 and Section 66001, et seq, of the Government Code and that said property is subject to fees for said drainage area. Notice is further given that, pursuant to Ordinance 13-01, payment of the drainage fees applicable to each phase shall be paid to the City of San Jacinto prior to certificate of occupancy of the 1st building permit for the phase, and that the property owner shall pay the fee required at the rate in effect at the upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final inspection
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 46 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering 90)All residential driveways shall be constructed per County of Riverside Standard No. 207. ☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering 91)All sidewalks shall comply with Riverside County Standard 401. ☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
92)Curb ramps shall include truncated domes per Riverside County Standard 403. ☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
93)The detention basin on Lot “A” is proposed to be maintained by the City.

The basin shall be constructed per City of San Jacinto and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCD) standards and design guidelines.

To dewater the basin, a sump pump and force main is required. The developer purposes to pump nuisance flows to a bubble-up structure in the Seventh Street right-of-way just west of Anza Trail. From there, the storm water would flow through the gutter to a catch basin at Serrano Street where it would be collected and discharged into a detention basin constructed with the Esplanade Specific Plan. The entire system, including the Esplanade Specific Plan basin, must be accepted by the City for maintenance prior to the issuance of the 1st occupancy permit for this development. ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 47 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
94)The developer shall provide water and sewer services to each lot in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate utility purveyor. This development is within the City of San Jacinto sewer service area, and the EMWD water service area. Water and sewer improvements shall be designed and installed per EMWD Standards.
☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
95)Existing power poles with cables 66kV and under along the alley shall be removed and cables undergrounded. Poles with cables over 66kV shall be relocated as necessary, but other utilities on the pole must be undergrounded. Provide an undergrounding of utilities study by a utility consultant/electrical engineer analyzing and determining the extent of conformance.
☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Engineering
96)The developer/property owner shall provide for utility trench surface repair as directed by the City Engineer if applicable. ☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Special Districts
97)Development must comply with Storm Water Basin & Pump Specifications and Standards. Privately maintained storm water and water quality systems will be required to submit an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for the basin lot. ☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Special Districts 98)Development must comply with Landscape and Irrigation Design Guidelines. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 48 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Special Districts
99)Landscape improvements shall include irrigation meters and backflow devices with tampering preventive cage, exclusive for right-of-way landscaping. Right-of-way landscaping must be divided from private property by form or mow-curb or other approved materials. ☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 1
Special Districts
100) Landscape areas in the right-of-way shall include an independent irrigation control system, with separate electric meter, exclusive for right-ofway landscaping.

Cal-Sense version approved by the Public Utilities Superintendent is required for City maintained irrigation areas. (Must be operational and certified by Cal-Sense).
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 49 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permits (Phase 2) Met? Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 2
Planning
101) All Phase 1 Conditions of Approval Prior to Occupancy Conditions are required to be completed. ☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 2
Planning
102) All required infrastructure including, streets, basins and landscape setbacks, shall be complete to the satisfaction of the Planning Division and the City Engineer. ☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 2
Planning
103) The applicant shall submit a revised plot plan that clearly illustrates all required setbacks measured from the property lines. a. The minimum setback from the property line to the garage shall be no less than twenty (20) feet.
b. The applicant shall identify rear elevations that face the public right-of-way and show how they will be architecturally enhanced. ☐
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits of
Phase 2
Planning
104) A Site Plan & Design Review plan shall be submitted and approved by the City. The design review shall be consistent with the Residential Development Design Regulations (Section 17.425.020) and other relevant sections of the Development Code. At a minimum it should consist of:
a. A precise grading plan with the plotting of homes, setbacks from property lines, paved areas, slopes, etc.;
b. Floor plans;
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 50 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permits (Phase 2) Met? c. Architectural elevations (in color) of all sides;
d. Typical front yard landscaping;
e. Entry monumentation, and parkway landscape treatments; f. Wall and Fence Plan that includes a decorative block wall around the perimeter of the project and interior fencing; and g. Common mailbox architectural treatment
h. Elevations of houses facing Esplanade Avenue, Cawston Avenue, and 7th Street shall be enhanced.

Prior to
Issuance of
Building Permits
of Phase 2
Planning
105) Submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval. The landscape plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect in conformance with Chapter 17.325 – Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation and Section 17.325.060 – Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package Requirements of the Development Code and the City Landscape Design Guidelines for review and approval by the City Landscape Architect. Plans should be submitted at least 30 days prior to the expected date of permit issuance. The Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package shall include:
a. A completed application packet provided by the City; b. The Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet, including the MAWA and ETWU; Note the ETo rate for San Jacinto is 56.8 per State guidelines.
c. The soils management report;
d. The landscape design plan;
e. The irrigation design plan;
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 51 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permits (Phase 2) Met? f. The grading plan.

Prior to
Issuance of
Building Permits
of Phase 2
Planning
106) Submit a Fence and Wall Plan for review that shows the following:
a. The developer will work with any adjacent property owners to remove existing walls/fencing (double walls are not permitted). b. The developer will show on the plans how they will connect to the existing wall located to the west. Proposed wall should be similar in color, material, pilaster size, and caps.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 52 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase 2) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Planning
107) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit the following items for the landscape and irrigation development and maintenance:
• The signed Landscape Certificate of Completion pursuant to Section 17.325.070– Certificate of Completion of the
Development Code;
• The irrigation scheduling pursuant to Section 17.325.080 – Irrigation Scheduling of the Development Code;
• The Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule pursuant to Section 17.325.090 – Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule of the Development Code; and
• The Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis pursuant to Section 17.325.100 — Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis of the Development Code.

Page 53 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase 2) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Planning
108) The developer shall pay all required Development Impact Fees (DIF) for parkland acquisition, parkland development, and park facilities in effect on the Vesting Date prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final inspection.at the time of permit issuance for each home. Upon the City’s acceptance of the completed parks, the developer will receive a refund of the applicable fees pursuant to Title 16 of the Municipal Code. The amount of the refund shall not exceed the actual cost of the parkland acquisition, parkland development, and park facilities, nor shall it exceed the amount of the fees initially paid. No cross-category credit or refund shall be provided. The developer must provide documentation to the City demonstrating that
the refunds do not exceed the actual costs incurred.
☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Building & Safety
109) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. This Project shall be subject to payment of these fees prior certificate of occupancy unless exempted by the ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect on the Vesting Date (3/31/2025). ☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Building & Safety
110) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such number plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which property fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background. ☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 54 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase 2) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Engineering
111) Construct all interior streets within Phase 2. Interior Streets shall be private with a full width of 52 feet to provide for 36 feet asphalt paving (using TI of 5.5 and PG 64-10), curb and gutter at 18 feet on both sides of centerline, an 8-foot parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6-sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside and Caltrans standards.

A 24-foot wide access shall be provided for Fire access at all times.

Street parking shall be restricted to one side of the street. ☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Engineering
112) Esplanade shall be improved to provide for a 73-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way, asphalt paving (using a TI of 9.5 and PG 70-10), 8-inch curb and gutter 38 feet north of centerline, a Class I: Multi-Use Path per the City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan, and an 35-foot wide parkway consisting of landscaping, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and Caltrans standards.

As part of the CIP program, the City is planning to widen Esplanade Avenue from Warren Road to Sanderson Avenue in 2026 and will include traffic signals at the intersections of Cawston Avenue and Sanderson Avenue, with two more lanes and a sidewalk. Streetlights will not be constructed as part of these improvements. The developer shall coordinate with the City on the installation of improvements.

If the existing pavement is in good condition the developer/property owner may use grind and overlay technique as determined by the City Engineer.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 55 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase 2) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Engineering
113) The developer shall provide water and sewer services to each lot in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate utility purveyor.

This development is within the City of San Jacinto sewer service area, and the EMWD water service area. Water and sewer improvements shall be designed and installed per EMWD Standards.
☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Engineering
114) Existing power poles with cables 66kV and under along the alley shall be removed and cables undergrounded. Poles with cables over 66kV shall be relocated as necessary, but other utilities on the pole must be undergrounded. Provide an undergrounding of utilities study by a utility consultant/electrical engineer analyzing and determining the extent of conformance.
☐
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Engineering 115) The developer/property owner shall provide for utility trench surface repair as directed by the City Engineer if applicable. ☐ Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Engineering
116) A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue. The intersection shall be improved to accommodate the required vehicular travel lanes and pedestrian crossings as recommended by the project’s traffic engineer and as directed by the City Engineer.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 56 of 58 ends

Timing
Responsible
Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase 2) Met? Prior to the
Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy of
Phase 2
Engineering
117) The following items need to be approved:
a. approved WDID No.
b. Geotechnical Report (for reference)
c. Storm Drain Improvement Plans
d. Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis
e. Final WQMP (for reference) including WDID No.

The design shall comply with, RCFCD and City of San Jacinto most recent standards, criteria, and requirement and in effect at the time of construction and shall be coordinated with the approved plans of the adjacent developments.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 57 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Operational Met?
Operational Planning
118) The Project is required to comply with San Jacinto Development Code Section 17.300.080 which requires all exterior lighting to be shielded or modified and located so as to eliminate spillover illumination or glare beyond the property line or upward into the sky. ☐
Operational Planning 119) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a thriving condition free of weeds, trash, and debris. ☐
Ongoing Planning
120) The erection (including excavation), demolition, alteration or repair of any building shall occur between the hours of seven a.m. and seven p.m. on weekdays and Saturdays, and between nine a.m. and six p.m. on Sundays and holidays, except when such work complies with the terms of a temporary use permit which may be issued by the community development director or his or her designee, upon a showing of sufficient need due to hot or inclement weather, or the use of an unusually long process material, or other circumstances of unusual and compelling nature.

All construction equipment shall be muffled and/or surrounded by noise attenuating barriers.
☐
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076
Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval

Page 58 of 58 ends

Timing Responsible
Department Operational Met?
Ongoing Planning
121) Mitigation Measure BIO-4. MSHCP Construction Minimization Measures. The Project Applicant and their designee (i.e., Construction Contractors) shall follow required MSHCP Construction Minimization Measures (Section 7.5.3 of the MSHCP). Applicable construction minimization measures are listed below.

Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented until such time soils are determined to be successfully stabilized. ☐

Chacon Farms Project
Tentative Tract Map No. 39076

FINAL INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Case No. PROJ23-0029
City of San Jacinto Planning and Building Division
595 South San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto, California 92583 Prepared By :
11801 Pierce Street, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92505
January 7, 2026
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 1.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 2 ends

1.0 CEQA Requirements Regarding Comments and Responses
Section 15088 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines requires the Lead Agency—in this case, the City of San Jacinto—to evaluate and respond in good faith to all substantive comments concerning environmental issues that are submitted by public agencies or interested parties during the public review period for an Environmental Impact Report. The intent of this requirement is to ensure that the environmental record reflects meaningful consideration of public and agency input and that decision-makers are fully informed of environmental issues raised by reviewers before acting on the project.

While CEQA does not require a written response to comments on a Mitigated Negative Declaration, the City of San Jacinto has elected to prepare responses received on the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) as a matter of good public policy and transparency. Accordingly, this Final IS/MND includes written responses to comments received during the public circulation period.

1.1 Public Review Process
Consistent with Sections 15072 and 15073 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Chacon Farms Project (Tentative Tract Map No. 39076; Case No. PROJ23-0029) was circulated for public review and comment for a 30-day period beginning October 28, 2025, and ending November 27, 2025. The Notice was filed with Riverside County Clerk, published in a newspaper of general circulation, and distributed to interested agencies, organizations, and individuals in accordance with CEQA requirements. During this period, the Draft IS/MND and supporting technical studies were made available for review at San Jacinto City Hall (595 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California) and on the City’s Planning Division webpage at:
https://www.sanjacintoca.gov/city_departments/community-development/planning/c_e_q_a Written comments received during the public review period are included in Section 2.0 of this Final IS/MND, followed by the City’s responses. The City of San Jacinto will consider this Final IS/MND—including all written comments and responses—prior to deciding whether to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the Chacon Farms Project.

1.2 Supplemental Technical Studies
In response to comments received during the public review period, supplemental technical studies have been prepared and are included as appendices to this Final IS/MND. These studies provide additional documentation substantiating the environmental analysis and conclusions of the Draft IS/MND. No revisions to the text of the Draft IS/MND were required. The supplemental studies include:
§ Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Stantec, December 2025) § LESA Model Analysis
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 1.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 3 ends

These additions constitute clarifying information that does not alter the environmental conclusions of the Draft IS/MND.

CEQA Guidelines § 15073.5 provides the circumstances when a lead agency must recirculate a negative declaration and changes that do not require recirculation. Recirculation is required when the negative declaration must be substantially revised after being circulated for public comment. A “substantial revision” means: “(1) A new, avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measures or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) The lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required.” Recirculation is not required for any of the following revisions:

1. Mitigation measures are replaced with equal or more effective measures pursuant to Section 15074.1.

2. New project revisions are added in response to written or verbal comments on the project’s effects identified in the proposed negative declaration which are not new avoidable significant effects.

3. Measures or conditions of project approval are added after circulation of the negative declaration which are not required by CEQA, which do not create new significant environmental effects and are not necessary to mitigate an avoidable significant effect.

4. New information is added to the negative declaration which merely clarifies, amplifies, or makes insignificant modifications to the negative declaration.

5. None of the revisions result in new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts. These additions constitute clarifying information pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15073.5(c)(4) and do not alter the environmental conclusions of the Draft IS/MND. Therefore, the conclusions of the Draft IS/MND remain valid, and recirculation under CEQA Guidelines §15073.5 is not required.

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 4 ends

2.0 Comment Letters and Responses
This section presents all written comments received during the public review period for the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) for the Chacon Farms Project, along with the City of San Jacinto’s written responses. Each comment letter has been assigned a unique identifier (e.g., Letter A, Letter B), and individual comments within each letter are numbered sequentially for reference (e.g., Comment A-1, A-2). Corresponding responses immediately follow each comment.

The following comment letters were received by the City of San Jacinto. ■ Comment Letter A: California Department of Toxic Substances Control, October 29, 2025
■ Comment Letter B: California Department of Conservation, November 18, 2025 ■ Comment Letter C: Talley Meadows Ranch, November 18, 2025 ■ Comment Letter D: Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), March 24, 2026 ■ Comment Letter E: Joe and Christy Talley, April 7, 2026 ■ Comment Letter F: Michael and Emalee Tomoni, April 7, 2026 This section intentionally left blank
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 5 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 6 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 7 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 8 ends

Responses To Letter A
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
Comment A-1
DTSC notes that when agricultural land is proposed for residential use, contaminants such as organochlorine pesticides and arsenic may be present. DTSC recommends that the Lead Agency identify potential historical pesticide use and conduct sampling to determine if remediation is necessary.

Response:

The Project site is zoned Rural Residential (RR), and a zone change to Low Density Residential (LDR is proposed, so it has long been zoned for residential uses. Despite the zoning, the City acknowledges the site’s long-term agricultural use and DTSC’s recommendations regarding potential contaminants of concern (COCs). A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by Partner Engineering (September 2024) documented historical crop cultivation and possible use of fertilizers and pesticides but did not identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) requiring immediate subsurface investigation.

Although not required by the Phase I ESA, Stantec completed a Phase II ESA in November 2025, advancing 18 soil borings in a grid pattern (one per four acres) to a depth of 3 feet. Shallow samples collected at 0.5 feet were analyzed for OCPs and arsenic; all results were non-detect above laboratory reporting limits. While the arsenic reporting limit of 5.0 mg/kg exceeds the residential screening level of 0.68 mg/kg, arsenic occurs naturally in California soils at concentrations up to 12 mg/kg, and DTSC's HERO Note 11 recognizes background levels as the appropriate cleanup standard.

Additionally, four borings in the area of historical livestock activity were extended to 15 feet and converted to dual-nested soil vapor probes for methane monitoring. Field readings collected in December 2025 detected methane at 310–500 ppmV, well below both the City of San Jacinto's 12,500 ppmV standard and the County Fire Authority's 5,000 ppmV threshold. Based on these results, neither the property's agricultural history nor its former livestock use constitutes a recognized environmental condition under ASTM E1527-21, and no further investigation is recommended. The Phase II ESA is attached as Appendix A.

Although the site remains under active agricultural cultivation, only organic fertilizer (manure) is used to ensure that the sampling that has been performed continues to accurately represent soil conditions at the cessation of farming. Based on the Phase I ESA, Phase II ESA, and the owner’s commitment to use only organic fertilizer, no additional sampling is required.

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 9 ends

Comment A-2.

DTSC recommends all imported soil/fill be tested to ensure it meets applicable screening levels.

Response: DTSC has not identified a new significant impact related to the project. The project applicant would obtain fill from sources that would prevent it from violating laws that would impose liability for contamination, such as the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, which regulates stormwater runoff.

Under the California Building Code (Title 24, Chapter 17, § 1705.6.1), fill used to support foundations must be continuously inspected by a geotechnical engineer. The duties of the geotechnical engineer include the approval of soils to be used as fill material and the testing of the completed fills. One item the geotechnical engineer confirms is that the purchased soil has documentation from the seller that the soil is “clean” and suitable for residential purposes.

In addition, the project isrequired to comply with Zoning Code section 17.325.060, which requires preparation of a soil management plan for landscape purposes, that includes submission to the City of San Jacinto. The City of San Jacinto requires as part of the soil management plan that an applicant submit soil samples to a qualified laboratory for analysis, encompassing soil texture, infiltration rate, pH, total soluble salts, sodium, and percent organic matter, along with mitigation recommendations. For phased or multi-lot development projects, a sampling rate of approximately 15% (one per seven lots) shall be deemed sufficient. The completed soil analysis report shall be incorporated into the Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package or, where significant mass grading is proposed, submitted concurrent with the certificate of completion.

Laboratory findings and recommendations shall be made available to qualified landscape and irrigation design professionals in a timely manner to inform any necessary plan modifications.

Prior to project closeout, the applicant shall provide the City with written verification that all soil analysis recommendations have been implemented as a condition of project approval.

Comment A-3
The City of San Jacinto should consider soil testing as mentioned in comment#1. If, in the event any COC results are above DTSC residential screening levels, DTSC recommends the City of San Jacinto address the contamination within the Project area through an Environmental Site Assessment and/or receive oversight from a self-certified local agency, DTSC or Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 10 ends

Response:

Comment A-3 reiterates DTSC’s recommendation in Comment A-2 regarding investigation of soils potentially impacted by former agricultural uses. See Response A-1 and Response A-2.

Comment A-4
DTSC would like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the MND for the Chacon Farms Project. Thank you for your assistance in protecting California’s people and environment from the harmful effects of toxic substances. If you have any questions or would like clarification on DTSC’s comments, please respond to this letter or via our CEQA Review email for additional guidance.

Response
The City of San Jacinto appreciates the Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC) review and comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Chacon Farms Project. The City acknowledges DTSC’s continued efforts to protect public health and the environment.

DTSC’s closing remarks are noted and will be included in the administrative record. No further revisions to the ISMND are warranted because no new or substantially more severe significant impacts have been identified.

This section intentionally left blank
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 11 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 25 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 26 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 27 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 28 ends

RESPONSES TO LETTER B

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION (DOC)
Comment B-1: Introduction
The DOC reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and provided advisory comments regarding the Project’s potential conversion of Important Farmland. The Department outlines its role in monitoring farmland resources, emphasizes that it is not taking a position on the Project, and offers general guidance on evaluating agricultural land impacts and potential mitigation options.

Response B-1:

The City appreciates the DOC’s clarification that its comments are advisory in nature and are intended to inform the CEQA process rather than advocate for or against the Project. As noted in the Department’s letter, the Department “respects local decision-making by informing the CEQA process and is not taking a position or providing legal or policy interpretation.” The City acknowledges this distinction and understands that the Department’s input is offered to identify resource considerations and potential assessment methodologies, and they do not constitute a directive or requirement for the City to implement particular measures, nor do they alter the City’s discretion to determine the significance of impacts or the feasibility of mitigation based on local circumstances and established policy.

Comment B-2: Project Description
DOC states that the Project proposes to subdivide three parcels via a Tentative Tract Map into 419 lots that will result in the development of 419 single-family detached residences, onsite roadways, open spaces and detention basin on 73.97 acres. The residential lots would be a minimum of 4,500 square feet. Residential structures would be 1 or 2 stories in height.

Response B-2:

The City acknowledges the Department's summary of the Project description. The final acreage of agricultural land converted is approximately 75.77 acres, and the Project involves a General Plan Amendment from Very Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential and Zone Change to permit Low Density Residential (LDR) development. For a full project description, see Section

3.1.4 of the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 29 ends

Comment B-3: Project Considerations
The conversion of agricultural land represents a permanent reduction and impact to California’s agricultural land resources. The Department generally advises discussion of the following in any environmental review for the loss or conversion of agricultural land:
■ Type, amount, and location of farmland conversion resulting directly and indirectly from implementation of the proposed project.
■ Impacts on any current and future agricultural operations in the vicinity; e.g., land-use conflicts, increases in land values and taxes, loss of agricultural support infrastructure such as processing facilities, etc.
■ Incremental impacts leading to cumulative impacts on agricultural land. This would include impacts from the proposed project, as well as impacts from past, current, and likely future projects.
■ Implementation of any City or County Agricultural Mitigation Plans, Programs, or Policies.
■ Proposed mitigation measures for impacted agricultural lands within the proposed project area.

Response B-3
The City acknowledges the DOC's comment regarding potential indirect impacts and land-use conflicts associated with the Project. As discussed in Section 4.2, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, this issue was thoroughly evaluated in the certified Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH# 2020120312) for the General Plan Update, which the City Council adopted through Resolution No. 3949, on November 15, 2022:
“The General Plan Update does not require the preservation of designated farmland; implementation of the General Plan Update could result in the conversion of farmland to nonagricultural uses. Any additional mitigation measures, such as the preservation of designated farmland, are not feasible and conflict with the other objectives of the General Plan Update, specifically to“ proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner ”and “attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents,” and would potentially discourage future development envisioned in the General Plan Update. Although the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to support continued agricultural use within the Study Area, the potential for the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 30 ends

Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance as identified by the FMMP to non-agricultural use would be a significant unavoidable impact.”1
Under CEQA Guidelines §15168, program EIRs may serve as the foundation for later activities that implement the program, allowing subsequent CEQA documents to use and rely on the broader program-level analysis where appropriate. The General Plan Update considered residential uses on the Project site. The agricultural resource impacts associated with converting Important Farmland within the Planning Area, including the infeasibility of preservation-based mitigation, were fully evaluated and disclosed in the General Plan 2040 Program EIR. The Proposed Project does not introduce new agricultural impacts or increase the severity of those identified in the certified EIR. This conclusion is valid even though the City opted to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project.

Accordingly, the CEQA analysis for the Project for agricultural resources could have tiered from the General Plan 2040 Program EIR under CEQA §§15162 and 15168 because the Project would not have new or substantially more significant impacts on agricultural resources than anticipated by the General Plan Update Program EIR, and no additional agricultural mitigation measures are required.

The Project also is consistent with General Plan policies related to managed growth. (General Plan, p. 27.) As the General Plan notes, the City of San Jacinto anticipates substantial growth with the potential to change community character. (Id.) Policy LU-2.4 specifically anticipates new development on land used for agriculture.

As discussed below, based on a stand-alone analysis of the Project’s impacts to agricultural resources, the Project would not have a significant impact on Important Farmland and does not require mitigation under CEQA. The information below supplements and amplifies the information in the Draft IS/MND.

Project Specific LESA Analysis
To evaluate site-specific agricultural viability, the City prepared a California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) Model analysis. The LESA Model, developed by the California Department of Conservation (DOC), is an optional quantitative tool available to lead agencies under CEQA for determining the significance of farmland conversion. The LESA assessment completed for the Chacon Farms Project confirms that the Project site is no longer situated within a viable agricultural environment and that the conversion of the site to residential use would not constitute a significant agricultural resource impact under LESA significance thresholds.

The LESA Model is a point-based system combining two components:
■ Land Evaluation (LE) – 50% of total score.
■ Site Assessment (SA) – 50% of total score
■ 1 City Council Resolution No. 3949, November 15, 2022.

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 31 ends

The combined LE and SA sub scores generate a Final LESA Score (0–100). Significance thresholds are defined in Table 2, California LESA Model Scoring Thresholds.

Table 1. California LESA Model Scoring Thresholds
00 Scoring Decision
0-39 Not Considered Significant
40-59 Significant only if both LE and SA ≥ 20
60-79 Considered Significant unless either LE or SA < 20 80-100 80–100 Considered Significant
Land Evaluation (LE) Component (50%)
LE focuses on two factors: Land Capability Classification (LCC) and Storie Index ratings, both reflecting soil qualities relevant to farming.

Land Compatibility Classification
LCC rates soils from I (best) to VIII (least suitable), with subclasses for specific limitations. Each property’s LCC Score is calculated by weighting class scores by acreage proportion; it makes up 25% of the total score.

The LE score measures inherent soil quality based on the Storie Index and LCC ratings, derived from USDA Web Soil Survey data as shown in Exhibit 1, Important Farmland Map, for the Project site.

This section intentionally left blank
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 32 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 33 ends

Soil Ratings (LCC and Storie Index)
The Project site is underlain by soils mapped as the Grangeville and Traver series. (See Exhibit 2, Soils Map. These soils are identified in the NRCS Web Soil Survey as having inherent limitations for agricultural production, including salinity, restricted drainage, and erosion susceptibility. These limitations influence agricultural productivity and are reflected in two standardized soil quality rating systems used by the LESA Model:

Land Capability Classification (LCC)
■ Rates soils from Class I (best) to Class VIII (least suitable). ■ Higher numerical values indicate greater limitations for farming. ■ For LESA scoring, each soil unit’s LCC rating is converted into a point value from 0 to 100 and then weighted by its percentage of the site.

Storie Index Rating
■ A 0–100 rating of soil quality based on profile characteristics, texture, slope, drainage, and limiting factors.
■ Higher values indicate better inherent soil quality.
■ Storie ratings are also weighted by acreage to generate a sitewide average.

Because the site contains only four soil map units (GoB, GsB, Tp2, and Tr2), and because all four occur across the entire 100% Area of Interest (AOI), the weighted averages represent the overall soil quality for the site.

Table 2. Soil Map Units, LCC Ratings, and Storie Index Values Soil Map
Units
% of AOI LCC Rating
(Points)
LCC Weighted
Score (×0.25)
Storie Index Storie Weighted
Score (×0.25)
Total LCC and
Storie
Subscore
GoB, GsB,
Tp2, Tr2
100% 49.44 12.36 46.03 11.51 23.87
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 34 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 35 ends

Site Assessment (SA) Component (50%)
The Site Assessment (SA) component of the LESA Model evaluates non-soil factors that influence the agricultural viability of a site, including parcel size, water availability, surrounding agricultural lands, and the presence of protected agricultural or conservation areas. These factors collectively represent 50 percent of the total LESA score. The SA analysis for the Project site is based on the Zone of Influence (ZOI), defined as the 0.5-mile area surrounding the site, consistent with DOC methodology.

Exhibit 3, Zone of Influence Map illustrates the 0.5-mile ZOI used to assess surrounding agricultural land conditions, fragmentation, and adjacent to urban or non-agricultural uses.

Exhibit 4, Protected Resources Map shows any Williamson Act enrolled lands, conservation easements, and other protected agricultural resource lands relative to the Project site.

This section intentionally left blank
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 36 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 37 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 38 ends

Table 3. Site Assessment Scoring Summary
SA Factor Rationale Score Weight Weighted
Score
Project Size (75.7
acres)
Large parcel size supports higher
agricultural resource value 100 0.15 15.00
Water Resource
Availability
EMWD UWMP prioritizes M&I demand;
agricultural water unreliable; capped well
not viable
0 0.15 0.00
Surrounding
Agricultural Land
Aerials show fragmentation/urban
conversion in ZOI 10 0.15 1.50
Protected Resource
Land
No Williamson Act, no Criteria Cell, <0.01%
protected 0 0.05 0.00
SA Subscore Total — — — 16.50
Scoring Assumptions and Supporting Justification
Water Resource Availability (0 points): Based on EMWD’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, agricultural water deliveries are not reliably available or economically feasible due to prioritization of municipal/industrial demand, tiered pricing, and replenishment assessments. The capped on-site well is not a guaranteed long-term agricultural supply.

Surrounding Agricultural Land (10 points): ZOI analysis and current aerial imagery show substantial urbanization, in the project area and cleared land to the west/north, indicating fragmentation and loss of agricultural support services.

Protected Resource Lands (0 points): The site is not under a Williamson Act contract and is not located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell or other protected resource designation.

Final LESA Score and Significance Determination
§ LE Sub score: 23.87
§ SA Sub score: 16.50
§ Final LESA Score: 40.37
Under the LESA scoring system, a score of 40–59 is considered significant only if both LE and SA sub scores are ≥ 20.

Because the SA Sub score (16.50) is below 20, the Project’s Final LESA Score of 40.37 is not considered significant under the LESA Model.

As supported by the analysis in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Project-specific LESA analysis above, the Project would not indirectly result in farmland conversion. The Project site is already in an area with fragmented farmland and would not increase the likelihood of the conversion of surrounding farmland. The Project also does not impact existing or future agricultural operations in the vicinity, mainly because the land immediately surrounding the Project site is not currently used for agricultural purposes, (confirmed through review of current Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 39 ends

aerial imagery and jurisdictional GIS/General Plan land use mapping within the 0.5-mile zone of influence [see Exhibit 3]). The nearest active agricultural operation is a dairy located to the south of Esplanade Avenue in the City of Hemet, which has a General Plan Land Use designation of Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Medium Density Residential (MDR).

Thus, all land surrounding the Project Site has land use designations that allow non-agricultural uses. The Project is not near any land protected by Williamson Act contracts and would not result in the cancellation of such a contract. Accordingly, the Project would have less than significant impacts to agricultural resources and no mitigation is required.

Comment B-4: Mitigating Agricultural Land Loss or Conversion Consistent with CEQA Guidelines, the Department advises that the environmental review address mitigation for the loss or conversion of agricultural land. The Department urges consideration of any other feasible measures necessary to mitigate project impacts.

Response B-4:

The Project's finding of Less Than Significant Impact to agricultural resources is supported by the analysis in the Draft IS/MND (Section 4.2, Agriculture and Forestry Resources). It also is supported by the LESA threshold analysis above, and by the application of CEQA tiering principles. See Response B-3.

Comment B-5: Conclusion and Request for Notices and Documents Thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Chacon Farms Project. Please provide the Department with notices of any future hearing dates as well as any staff reports pertaining to this project.

Response B-5:

The City acknowledges the DOC’s gratitude and request for ongoing notifications. The DOC will be provided with notices of any future public hearings, and any staff reports pertaining to the Chacon Farms Project in accordance with CEQA statutes and guidelines.

Finding: The comments do not identify any new significant environmental impacts, do not demonstrate that previously identified impacts would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the Draft IS/MND, and do not require the addition of new or considerably different mitigation measures or project alternatives. Accordingly, the City finds that recirculation of the IS/MND is not required under CEQA Guidelines §15088.5.

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 40 ends

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 41 ends

Responses To Letter C
Talley Meadows Ranch
Comment: Improve Cawston Avenue for Pedestrian and Traffic Safety The commenter expressed concern about traffic safety and pedestrian hazards on Cawston Avenue along the project frontage. They noted that the street is currently one lane each way with a drainage ditch on one side, and this bottleneck is a serious safety concern given the presence of three schools nearby and the traffic generated by their horse ranch. The commenter felt it was "imperative" to widen and improve Cawston Avenue to match the configuration north of 7th Street and south of Esplanade Avenue Response:

The City acknowledges the commenter's concern regarding pedestrian and traffic safety, including the current existing two-lane undivided condition of Cawston Avenue. However, the comment does not raise an issue on the adequacy of the CEQA document, which indicates that the Project would not create a new traffic safety hazard. (See Draft IS/MND section

4.17.2.c.) As documented in the Draft Transportation Impact Study, Cawston Avenue is classified as a major roadway and is operating well below its available capacity, with no existing operational or safety deficiencies identified along the project frontage. Traffic operations along Cawston Avenue, including roadway segments and study intersections, currently operate at acceptable levels of service consistent with City standards, and the project would not degrade roadway performance or introduce unsafe conditions.

Issues related to the safety and functional design of the street frontage also will be addressed during the Tentative Tract Map (No. 39076) engineering review and approval process, which ensures that any frontage improvements or design details comply with the City’s adopted roadway, pedestrian, and safety standards.

While the comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND and therefore does not require a written response under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements, the City provides the following response for informational purposes.

Required Off-Site Frontage Improvements
Cawston Avenue is classified as a major roadway by the City of San Jacinto. To address the existing non-standard condition and ensure the Project conforms to the City’s Major Thoroughfare Standards, the Project is required to implement the following off-site frontage improvements adjacent to the west side of Cawston Avenue as Conditions of Approval:
■ Addition of one travel lane.
■ Construction of a standard sidewalk to enhance pedestrian safety. ■ Construction of a 12-foot-wide parkway.
■ Construction of a curb and gutter section.

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 42 ends

■ Widening of the roadway section to fully conform to the City's Major Roadway Standards.

These specific improvements are mandated by City Engineering after their review of Tentative Tract Map No. 39076. The scope of work listed above constitutes the full extent of the Project's required commitment for its direct frontage, ensuring compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. The requirement to add a travel lane addresses the commenter’s concern with narrow streets and “bottlenecks.” The addition of a lane also allows slower vehicles to be in a separate lane than faster vehicles. The requirement to add a sidewalk addresses the commenter’s concern about pedestrian safety.

Phase II Environmental Site
Assessment
Chacon Farms Project
Approximately 73.97 Acres of Land
Southwest of Seventh Street and
Cawston Avenue
San Jacinto, California
December 16, 2025
Stantec Project Number: 185807160
Prepared for:

Chacon, LLC
1281 North State Street, Suite A-536
San Jacinto, California 92583
Prepared by:

Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
735 East Carnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, California 92408
Appendix A

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
This document entitled Phase II Environmental Site Assessment was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Chacon, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document.

Prepared by
(signature)
Alicia Jansen
Senior Scientist
Reviewed by
(signature)
Jim DeWoody
Principal Scientist
Approved by
(signature)
Kyle Emerson, CEG
Managing Principal Geologist

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

1.1 Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1.1

1.1 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................. 1.1

2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................ 2.1

2.1 PRE-DRILLING ACTIVITIES.......................................................................................... 2.1

2.2 INVESTIGATION............................................................................................................ 2.1

2.2.1 Soil Boring and Sampling Procedures ...........................................................2.1

2.2.2 Soil Vapor Probe Construction.......................................................................2.2

2.2.3 Field Equipment Cleaning Procedures ..........................................................2.2

3.0 TESTING PROCEDURES ............................................................................................. 3.1

3.1 SOIL SAMPLING METHODOLOGY .............................................................................. 3.1

3.2 METHANE SAMPLING METHODOLOGY..................................................................... 3.1

4.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS.......................................................................................... 4.1

4.1 FIELD OBSERVATIONS................................................................................................ 4.1

4.2 METHANE SAMPLE RESULTS..................................................................................... 4.1

4.3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS................................................................................................ 4.1

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................. 5.1

6.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................ 6.1

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 – Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Table 2 – Summary of Methane Survey Results

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 – Subject Property Location Map
Figure 2 – Soil Boring Locations

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Laboratory Data Sheets

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
i
Executive Summary
On behalf of Chacon, LLC, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) has prepared this Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report for the property located southwest of Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, California (the Subject Property; Figure 1). The investigation was performed based on the scope of work set forth in Stantec’s proposal entitled Proposal for Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), dated November 13, 2025.

Chacon, LLC (the “User”) has been designated as the User of this report.

The Subject Property consists of approximately 73.97 acres of agricultural land. With respect to the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (ISMND) submitted for public and agency input, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) concluded that, based on review of historical documents including aerial photographs and topographic maps, the Subject Property appears to have been utilized for agricultural use. Due to the potential for residual agricultural chemicals to be present in shallow soils, DTSC requested sampling and analysis of shallow soil for the presence of residual organochloride pesticides (OCPs) and heavy metals (arsenic).

To investigate this concern expressed by the DTSC, Stantec completed a Phase II ESA at the Subject Property in November of 2025, which included the following scope of work:
• Stantec advanced one (1) boring per four (4) acres in a grid pattern across the 73 acres of agricultural land at the Subject Property. Based on the grid sampling, a total of eighteen (18) soil borings were advanced to a maximum depth of 3 feet below ground surface (bgs) throughout the Subject Property.

Soil samples were collected at 0.5 feet bgs depth intervals for analysis of OCPs and arsenic.

Accordingly, 18 shallow soil samples collected from the 0.5-foot intervals were submitted to the laboratory for analysis of OCPs and arsenic. The remaining 18 deeper soil samples collected from 2.5-

3.0 feet were submitted to the laboratory and placed on hold, pending the results of the shallow analysis of OCPs and arsenic (to determine whether further analysis was warranted). • Four (4) of the 18 soil borings (SB-9 through SB-12) were further advanced to a maximum depth of 15-ft bgs in the area with historical livestock activities and converted into dual-nested soil vapor probes at 5- and 15-ft bgs for a methane survey (See Figure 2 for locations).

The laboratory reported no detections of OCPs or arsenic above the laboratory reporting limit in any of the soil samples submitted for analysis (i.e., the results were “non-detect”), as presented in Table 1. The laboratory reporting limit for arsenic was 5.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), which exceeded regulatory thresholds for residential soil set at 0.68 mg/kg (Appendix A). However, arsenic occurs naturally in soil throughout the State of California at levels of up to 12 mg/kg and, therefore, commonly exceeds the regulatory threshold due to naturally-occurring conditions. Accordingly, the State of California typically uses the background level, as presented in DTSC’s HERO Note 11, as the cleanup standard for arsenic. No arsenic was detected in any of the soil samples collected at the Subject Property at concentrations exceeding applicable cleanup levels.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
ii
The soil vapor probes were installed by directly pushing them into the ground. Based on the DTSC guidance, the installed vapor probes were allowed to set for at least two (2) hours prior to sampling to allow the seals to set. Probe pressure readings were recorded on field data sheets prior to sample collection or purging. Prior to sample collection, three tubing volumes were purged through a pump at a flow rate of 150-200 ml/minute. After purging was complete, the surface-end of the Teflon tubing was connected to a RKI Eagle, and soil vapor was drawn through the device and analyzed on site for methane, hydrogen sulfide, oxygen, and carbon monoxide.

Field readings were collected on two days (December 4 and 5, 2025) at least 24 hours apart. The field readings showed methane detections ranging from 310 to 500 parts per million by volume (ppmV), which levels are significantly below the standard expressed by the City of San Jacinto, which was 12,500 ppmV, and also significantly below the other published County Fire Authority standard of 5,000 ppmV (Table 2).

Additionally, oxygen and carbon dioxide percentages showed solid correlation and are typical of aerobic conditions in the soil.

Based on these results, the Subject Property’s historical agricultural and livestock uses are not considered a recognized environmental condition (REC) pursuant to ASTM E1527-21 or a concern in relation to the contemplated redevelopment of the Subject Property for residential purposes. Therefore, Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding these issues, or in regard to the environmental condition of the Subject Property.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

1.1 1.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of Chacon, LLC, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) has prepared this Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report for the property located southwest of Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, California (the “Subject Property”; Figure 1). The investigation was performed based on the scope of work set forth in Stantec’s proposal entitled Proposal for Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, dated November 13, 2025. Chacon, LLC (the “User”) has been designated as the User of this report.

1.1 BACKGROUND
The Subject Property consists of approximately 73.97 acres of agricultural land. The Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (ISMND) was submitted for public and agency input and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) concluded, based on review of historical documents, including aerial photographs and topographic maps, that the Subject Property appears to have been utilized for agricultural use. Due to the potential for residual agricultural chemicals to be present in shallow soils, DTSC requested that shallow soils be sampled and analyzed in order to determine whether residual organochloride pesticides (OCPs) or heavy metals (arsenic) were present above applicable regulatory thresholds for residential use.

Accordingly, to address DTSC’s concern, Stantec completed a Phase II ESA at the Subject Property in November 2025. The results of that investigation are presented in the following sections of this report and, as discussed in detail, have concluded that the historical agricultural use of the Subject Property represents neither a recognized environmental condition nor a human health risk in contemplation of the proposed residential development of the Subject Property.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

2.1 2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION
Prior to the commencement of fieldwork activities, Stantec made the following preparations.

2.1 PRE-DRILLING ACTIVITIES
• Stantec visited the Property to mark the proposed boring locations. Subsequent to the marking, Underground Service Alert (USA) was notified at least 72-hours prior to the commencement of drilling activities; and,
• In accordance with federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations (29 CFR, Section 1910.120), Stantec generated a site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) for the Property. All Stantec personnel and subcontractors associated with the project were required to be familiar with and comply with all provisions of the HASP.

2.2 INVESTIGATION
To address the requested work by the DTSC outlined above, Stantec completed a Limited Phase II ESA in November 2025. Stantec provided the services of a field geologist to supervise and direct the advancement of multiple soil, and soil vapor borings at the Property. All work was conducted under the direct oversight of a State of California professional and included the following:
• Stantec advanced one (1) boring per four (4) acres in a grid pattern across the 73 acres of agricultural land at the Subject Property. Based on the grid sampling a total of eighteen (18) soil borings were advanced to a maximum depth of 3 foot below ground surface (bgs) throughout the Subject Property. Soil samples were collected at 0.5 feet bgs depth intervals for analysis of OCPs and arsenic. The 18 shallow soil samples collected from the 0.5-foot intervals were submitted to the laboratory for analysis of OCPs and arsenic. The remaining 18 deeper soil samples collected from 2.5- 3.0 feet were submitted to the laboratory and placed on hold, pending the results of the shallow analysis of OCPs and arsenic.
• Four (4) of the 18 soil borings (SB-9 through SB-12) were further advanced to a maximum depth of 15-ft bgs in the area with historical livestock activities and converted into dual-nested soil vapor probes at 5- and 15-ft bgs for a methane survey (See Figure 2 for locations).

2.2.1 Soil Boring and Sampling Procedures
Each pesticide boring location was drilled with a hand auger to a depth of three (3) feet below ground surface (bgs) to clear the location of utilities and collect the required soil samples. Soil samples collected within the upper three (3) feet were collected by discharging the hand auger contents directly into precleaned laboratory-provided eight-ounce glass jars with Teflon®-lined lids. All sample containers were labeled with the appropriate identification information (boring number, sample depth, sample collection

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

2.2 date, and sample collection time). After collection the soil samples were placed in an iced cooler for preservation until delivery to the laboratory.

2.2.2 Soil Vapor Probe Construction
The soil vapor probes were installed in general accordance with the methodologies outlined in the July 2015 California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) “Advisory - Active Soil Gas Investigations” (DTSC Advisory).

Four additional soil borings (SB-9 through SB-12) were further advanced into native soils to a depth of 15 feet bgs with a Geoprobe drilling rig that utilized a hydraulically driven direct push system equipped with

1.5-inch outer diameter rods. Following the advancement of the borings to the terminal depth, the vapor sampling probe were installed in the borehole with sampling screens positioned at 5- and 15-feet bgs and connecting the screen up to the ground surface via dedicated Teflon tubing.

The annulus around the exposed sampling screens was backfilled with a silica sand pack to an elevation of approximately six inches above the sampling interval. Above the filter pack, a 12-inch transition seal was constructed using fine bentonite granules. From that point to ground surface, hydrated bentonite granules will be utilized to seal the annular space. At the surface, the exposed Teflon tubing was capped with tight fitting plastic end-caps and labeled to indicate sampling depth.

2.2.3 Field Equipment Cleaning Procedures
To maintain quality control during drilling operations, all drill rods and reusable soil sampling equipment was decontaminated using a triple bucket rinse. Prior to drilling at a given location or sampling interval, all equipment coming in direct contact with soil samples was scrubbed with an Alconox scrub solution followed by a clean tap water rinse and then a final distilled water rinse.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

3.1 3.0 TESTING PROCEDURES

3.1 SOIL SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
All chemical analyses was performed at State of California-certified laboratories. Collected soil samples were analyzed at Jones Environmental, Inc. (Jones) located in Santa Fe Springs, California. All samples were managed under strict chain-of-custody. The soil results are discussed below and presented in Table

1. Complete laboratory reports, including QA/QC documentation is included in Appendix A.

3.2 METHANE SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
The soil vapor probes were allowed to set for at least two (2) hours prior to sampling to allow the seals to set. Probe pressure readings were recorded on field data sheets prior to sample collection or purging. Prior to sample collection, three tubing volumes were purged through a pump at a flow rate of 150-200 ml/minute.

After purging was complete, the surface-end of the Teflon tubing was connected to a RKI Eagle and soil vapor was drawn through the device and analyzed on site for methane, hydrogen sulfide, oxygen, and carbon monoxide.

The survey included two rounds of field sampling performed 24-hours apart – one round on December 4, 2025, and the second round of sampling was performed on December 5, 2025.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

4.1 4.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS

4.1 FIELD OBSERVATIONS
On November 20, 2025, Stantec personnel oversaw the advancement of eighteen (18) soil borings at the Subject Property (A1-0.5 through F3-0.5) to 3-ft bgs and four (4) borings (SB-9 through SB-12) to 15-ft bgs.

Soils encountered during this round of assessment consisted of silty sand to clayey sands. No staining or odor was observed in any of the borings advanced during this assessment. All boring locations are depicted on Figure 2.

4.2 METHANE SAMPLE RESULTS
Field readings were collected on two days (December 4 and 5, 2025) at least 24 hours apart. The field readings showed methane detections ranging from 310 to 500 parts per million by volume (ppmV) which is significantly below the verbal City of San Jacinto standard of 12,500 ppmV and published County Fire Authority Standard of 5,000 ppmV (Table 2). Additionally, oxygen and carbon dioxide percentages showed solid correlation and are typical of aerobic conditions in the soil.

4.3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Laboratory analytical test results from this assessment are attached as Appendix A. A summary of the analytical data from this assessment is provided in Tables 1 and 2. The laboratory test results from this phase of investigation are discussed below. All soil boring locations from this assessment are presented on Figure 2.

Soil Results
The laboratory reported that there were no detections of OCPs or arsenic above the laboratory reporting limit in any of the soil samples submitted for analysis (i.e., the results were “non-detect”) as presented in Table 1. The laboratory reporting limit for arsenic was 5.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), which exceeded regulatory thresholds for residential soil set at 0.68 mg/kg (Appendix A). However, arsenic occurs naturally in soil throughout the State of California at levels of up to 12 mg/kg and, therefore, commonly exceeds the regulatory threshold due to naturally-occurring conditions. Accordingly, the State of California typically uses the background level, as presented in DTSC’s HERO Note 11, as the cleanup standard for arsenic and no arsenic was detected at the Subject Property at concentrations exceeding applicable cleanup levels.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

5.1 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
There were no methane detections in the former livestock areas at concentrations exceeding typical levels of concern (generally considered to be 0.5% by volume, or 5,000 parts per million by volume [ppmV] methane) – or above standards articulated by the City of San Jacinto or other County Fire Authority. Accordingly, based on the data, and in light of the contemplated redevelopment of the Subject Property for residential purposes, Stantec anticipates no further action or investigation regarding methane in soil vapor at the Subject Property.

Based on these results, the Subject Property’s historical agricultural use is not considered a recognized environmental condition (REC) or a concern to contemplated redevelopment for residential purposes, nor are the former livestock areas, and Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding these issues – or in regard to the environmental condition of the of the Subject Property.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

6.1 6.0 LIMITATIONS
The conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions based on data described in this report.

The opinions of this report have been arrived at in accordance with currently accepted hydrogeologic and engineering standards and practices applicable to this location and are subject to the following inherent limitations. Stantec makes no other warranty, either expressed or implied, concerning the conclusions and professional advice that is contained within the body of this report.

Inherent in most projects performed in a heterogeneous subsurface environment, continuing excavation and assessments may reveal findings that are different than those presented herein. This facet of the environmental profession should be considered when formulating professional opinions on the limited data collected on these projects.

This report has been issued with the clear understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or their representative, to make appropriate notifications to regulatory agencies. It is specifically not the responsibility of Stantec to conduct appropriate notifications as specified by current County and State regulations.

The information presented in this report is valid as of the date our exploration was performed. Site conditions may degrade with time; consequently, the findings presented herein are subject to change.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
TABLES
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Results - 2025
Pesticides by EPA 8081A, Metals by EPA 6010B
Chacon Farm Site - West 7th Street and Cawston Ave, San Jacinto, California Stantec Job No.: 185807160
Sample
Location Sample ID Depth (1) Date
Pesticides (EPA Test Method 8081A) Metals (EPA Test
Method 6010B)
4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT Total DDT
Compounds Toxaphene Other OCPs
Arsenic
Total STLC (2)
Screening Levels for residential soil (3) 2.3 2.0 1.9 NE 0.45 varies 0.11 (4) -- Hazardous Waste Levels 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 NE varies 500 5.0 Typical Background Levels in California NE NE NE NE NE NE 0.6-11.8 (4) -- Soil Samples
N
o F r i
t e h l e d r
n
A1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA A2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA A3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA B1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA B2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA B3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA C1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA C2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA C3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA S
o F u i t
h e
e l
r d
n
D1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA D2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA D3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA E1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA E2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA E3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA F1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA F2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA F3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA NOTES: ABBREVIATIONS:

All concentrations reported in milligrams of metal per kilogram of soil (mg/kg) DTSC - Department of Toxic Substances Control (1) Sample depth is reported as feet below ground surface HERO - Human and Ecological Risk Office (2) Screening level value is determined by the more conservative value from the California DTSC HERO Note 3, updated March 2025 or USEPA RSLs, updated November 2024 NA - Not analyzed
ND - Not detected
(3) Arsenic has been found to exist in naturally in soils up to 22 mg/kg in the state of California. It is generally considered acceptable at concentrations of 12 mg/Kg or less NE - Not established
STLC - Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
(4) Chernoff G., Bosan W., and Oudiz B., DTSC, Determination of a Southern California Regional Background Arsenic Concentration in Soil
USEPA RSL - United States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels, residential use.
< - Indicates the concentration was not detected above the laboratory method reporting limit.

BOLD - Indicates the concentration is above the laboratory reporting level Concentration exceeds USEPA Region 9 RSL or DTSC Hero Note 3 Concentration exceeds Southern California regional background levels Concentration exceed the California Hazardous Waste Level Table 2
Summary of Methane Survey Results - 2025
Chacon Farm Site - West 7th Street and Cawston Ave, San Jacinto, California Stantec Job No.: 185807161
Boring Location Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Below
Ground
Surface
(feet)
Sample
Date
Pressure
(Inches of
Water)
Methane
(ppmV)
Oxygen
(%)
Carbon
Monoxide
(ppm)
Hydrogen
Sulfide
(ppm)
Orange County Standard (Mandatory Procedures for
Mitigation, as contained herein, shall be applied to all buildings within 300 feet of the affected location(s).

NE 5,000 NE NE NE
Orange County Standard (all buildings within 300 feet of the affected location(s) shall have a specific soil gas mitigation plan approved by a Registered Professional.)
NE 12,500 NE NE NE
City of San Jacinto Standard (Quoted by City of San
Jacinto Field Inspector) NE 12,500 NE NE NE
Northern Portion of
Chacon Farms
SB9-5 5 12/4/2025 0.0 410 19.4 0 0
12/5/2025 -0.1 390 19.5 0 0
SB9-15 15
12/4/2025 0.0 390 18.8 0 0
12/5/2025 0.0 370 18.8 0 0
SB10-5 5 12/4/2025 0.0 460 20.2 0 0
12/5/2025 0.0 490 19.7 0 0
SB10-15 15
12/4/2025 0.12 460 19.5 0 0
12/5/2025 0.12 500 19.2 0 0
SB11-5 5 12/4/2025 0.0 370 16.7 0 0
12/5/2025 0.0 370 16.8 0 0
SB11-15 15
12/4/2025 0.0 -- -- -- --
12/5/2025 -0.22 -- -- -- --
SB12-5 5 12/4/2025 0.0 390 14.4 0 0
12/5/2025 0.0 390 14.9 0 0
SB12-15 15
12/4/2025 0.0 330 13 0 0
12/5/2025 0.0 310 13 0 0
Notes: All concentrations reported in parts per million by volume (ppmV) Sample analyzed by Eagle Field Meter.
-- Not Analyzed
NE - Not Established
Light gray shading indicates value at or above the Orange County residential screening level.

Light gray shading indicates value at or above the City of San Jacinto residential screening level.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

FIGURES

SUBJECT PROPERTY
0 1000 2000 3000 4000FT
SCALE : AS SHOWN
NOTE: THIS DRAWING ILLUSTRATES SUPPORTING INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO A STANTEC SERVICES INC. REPORT AND MUST NOT BE USED FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 185807160

SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

SOUTHWEST OF SEVENT STREET AND CAWSTON AVENUE, SAN JACINTO, CA

CHACON, LLC

APPROXIMATE SUBJECT

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

SOIL BORING LOCATIONS -
STANTEC, NOVEMBER, 2025
0 200 400 600 800FT
NOTE: THIS DRAWING ILLUSTRATES SUPPORTING INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO A STANTEC CONSULTING LTD. REPORT AND MUST NOT BE USED FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

SOIL BORING LOCATIONS

T OF SEVENT STREET AND CAWSTON AVENUE, SAN JACINTO, CA CHACON, LLC 185807160

AS SHOWN
25/12/13
SC2025120015
OK
KE
SCALE : AS SHOWN
2 CD

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX A

LABORATORY DATA SHEETS
Logo
02 December 2025
Jim DeWoody
Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Re: Chacon Farms
Enclosed are the results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on 11/21/25. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
1 of 41
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
2 of 41
Stantec Consulting Project: Chacon Farms
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project Number:

Project Manager:
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01

ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES
Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received A1-0.5 J254478-001 Soil 11/20/2025 09:06 11/21/2025 16:19 A2-0.5 J254478-002 Soil 11/20/2025 07:53 11/21/2025 16:19 A3-0.5 J254478-003 Soil 11/20/2025 07:49 11/21/2025 16:19 B1-0.5 J254478-007 Soil 11/20/2025 00:00 11/21/2025 16:19 B2-0.5 J254478-008 Soil 11/20/2025 07:58 11/21/2025 16:19 B3-0.5 J254478-009 Soil 11/20/2025 07:44 11/21/2025 16:19 C1-0.5 J254478-013 Soil 11/20/2025 09:16 11/21/2025 16:19 C2-0.5 J254478-014 Soil 11/20/2025 08:02 11/21/2025 16:19 C3-0.5 J254478-015 Soil 11/20/2025 07:36 11/21/2025 16:19 D1-0.5 J254478-019 Soil 11/20/2025 09:21 11/21/2025 16:19 D2-0.5 J254478-020 Soil 11/20/2025 08:26 11/21/2025 16:19 D3-0.5 J254478-021 Soil 11/20/2025 07:30 11/21/2025 16:19 E1-0.5 J254478-025 Soil 11/20/2025 09:26 11/21/2025 16:19 E2-0.5 J254478-026 Soil 11/20/2025 08:32 11/21/2025 16:19 E3-0.5 J254478-027 Soil 11/20/2025 07:20 11/21/2025 16:19 F1-0.5 J254478-031 Soil 11/20/2025 09:32 11/21/2025 16:19 F2-0.5 J254478-032 Soil 11/20/2025 08:37 11/21/2025 16:19 F3-0.5 J254478-033 Soil 11/20/2025 07:21 11/21/2025 16:19 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
3 of 41

DETECTIONS SUMMARY
Sample ID: A1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-001
No Results Detected
Sample ID: A2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-002
No Results Detected
Sample ID: A3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-003
No Results Detected
Sample ID: B1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-007
No Results Detected
Sample ID: B2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-008
No Results Detected
Sample ID: B3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-009
No Results Detected
Sample ID: C1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-013
Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
4 of 41
No Results Detected
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
5 of 41

DETECTIONS SUMMARY
Sample ID: C2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-014
No Results Detected
Sample ID: C3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-015
No Results Detected
Sample ID: D1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-019
No Results Detected
Sample ID: D2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-020
No Results Detected
Sample ID: D3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-021
No Results Detected
Sample ID: E1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-025
No Results Detected
Sample ID: E2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-026
Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
6 of 41
No Results Detected
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
7 of 41

DETECTIONS SUMMARY
Sample ID: E3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-027
No Results Detected
Sample ID: F1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-031
No Results Detected
Sample ID: F2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-032
No Results Detected
Sample ID: F3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-033
No Results Detected
Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
8 of 41
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
9 of 41
A1-0.5
J254478-001(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2511466 11/26/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 89.85 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 102.74 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
10 of 41
A2-0.5
J254478-002(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2511466 11/26/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 73.89 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 83.63 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
11 of 41
A3-0.5
J254478-003(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2511466 11/26/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 93.51 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 108.43 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
12 of 41
B1-0.5
J254478-007(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 88.90 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 101.15 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
13 of 41
B2-0.5
J254478-008(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 86.55 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 97.61 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
14 of 41
B3-0.5
J254478-009(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 87.56 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 97.50 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
15 of 41
C1-0.5
J254478-013(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 88.51 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 100.66 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
16 of 41
C2-0.5
J254478-014(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 84.83 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 98.13 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
17 of 41
C3-0.5
J254478-015(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 100.58 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 111.22 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
18 of 41
D1-0.5
J254478-019(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 103.86 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 116.07 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
19 of 41
D2-0.5
J254478-020(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 112.18 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 123.67 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
20 of 41
D3-0.5
J254478-021(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 96.62 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 110.65 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
21 of 41
E1-0.5
J254478-025(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 106.52 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 118.54 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
22 of 41
E2-0.5
J254478-026(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 104.91 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 115.32 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
23 of 41
E3-0.5
J254478-027(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 106.51 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 120.78 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
24 of 41
F1-0.5
J254478-031(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512054 12/01/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 90.98 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 78.09 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
25 of 41
F2-0.5
J254478-032(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512054 12/01/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 80.14 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 69.61 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
26 of 41
F3-0.5
J254478-033(Soil)
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512054 12/01/25 EPA 8081
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " "
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " "
Surrogate: TCMX 85.18 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 76.97 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
LCS 1
Method Blank 1
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
28 of 41
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
29 of 41
Analyte
EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC
Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512038 - EPA 6010
CCV 1
Arsenic, As 1.0 5.0 % 1 100 90 - 110 110
Arsenic, As
LCSD 1
Arsenic, As
171 5.0 %
172 5.0 %
200 85 80 - 120
200 86 80 - 120 0.60 120
Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg
Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
LCS 1
Method Blank 1
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
30 of 41
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
31 of 41
Analyte
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC
Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512017 - EPA 8081
CCV 1
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
alpha-BHC 113 10.0 % 100 113 80 - 120 120
Heptachlor 117 10.0 % 100 117 80 - 120 120
Aldrin 117 10.0 % 100 117 80 - 120 120
Heptachlor epoxide 114 10.0 % 100 114 80 - 120 120
gamma-Chlordane 110 10.0 % 100 110 80 - 120 120
Endosulfan I 114 10.0 % 100 114 80 - 120 120
4,4'-DDE 107 10.0 % 100 107 80 - 120 120
Dieldrin 112 10.0 % 100 112 80 - 120 120
Endrin 105 10.0 % 100 105 80 - 120 120
4,4'-DDD 111 10.0 % 100 111 80 - 120 120
Endosulfan II 105 10.0 % 100 105 80 - 120 120
4,4'-DDT 111 10.0 % 100 111 80 - 120 120
Endrin ketone 111 10.0 % 100 111 80 - 120 120
LCS 1
alpha-BHC 102 10.0 % 100 102 60 - 140
Heptachlor 119 10.0 % 100 119 60 - 140
Aldrin 108 10.0 % 100 108 60 - 140
Heptachlor epoxide 108 10.0 % 100 108 60 - 140
gamma-Chlordane 101 10.0 % 100 101 60 - 140
Endosulfan I 108 10.0 % 100 108 60 - 140
4,4'-DDE 101 10.0 % 100 101 60 - 140
Dieldrin 104 10.0 % 100 104 60 - 140
Endrin 97.2 10.0 % 100 97 60 - 140
4,4'-DDD 104 10.0 % 100 104 60 - 140
Endosulfan II 106 10.0 % 100 106 60 - 140
4,4'-DDT 108 10.0 % 100 108 60 - 140
Endrin ketone 105 10.0 % 100 105 60 - 140
Surrogate: TCMX 112.19 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 119.51 % 30 - 135
LCSD 1
alpha-BHC 105 10.0 % 100 105 60 - 140 3.23 140
Heptachlor 121 10.0 % 100 121 60 - 140 1.64 140
Aldrin 111 10.0 % 100 111 60 - 140 3.60 140
Heptachlor epoxide 111 10.0 % 100 111 60 - 140 3.46 140 gamma-Chlordane 104 10.0 % 100 104 60 - 140 2.46 140
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
32 of 41
Analyte
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC
Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512017 - EPA 8081
Endosulfan I 109 10.0 % 100 109 60 - 140 0.60 140
4,4'-DDE 104 10.0 % 100 104 60 - 140 3.48 140
Dieldrin 107 10.0 % 100 107 60 - 140 2.88 140
Endrin 103 10.0 % 100 103 60 - 140 5.57 140
4,4'-DDD 105 10.0 % 100 105 60 - 140 0.48 140
Endosulfan II 109 10.0 % 100 109 60 - 140 3.43 140
4,4'-DDT 109 10.0 % 100 109 60 - 140 1.48 140
Endrin ketone 109 10.0 % 100 109 60 - 140 3.94 140
Surrogate: TCMX 115.36 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 123.20 % 30 - 135
Method Blank 1
alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg
Surrogate: TCMX 106.41 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 113.95 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
LCSD 1
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
33 of 41
Analyte
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC
Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512018 - EPA 8081
CCV 1
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
alpha-BHC 112 10.0 % 100 112 80 - 120 120
Heptachlor 111 10.0 % 100 111 80 - 120 120
Aldrin 117 10.0 % 100 117 80 - 120 120
Heptachlor epoxide 115 10.0 % 100 115 80 - 120 120
gamma-Chlordane 112 10.0 % 100 112 80 - 120 120
Endosulfan I 112 10.0 % 100 112 80 - 120 120
4,4'-DDE 109 10.0 % 100 109 80 - 120 120
Dieldrin 113 10.0 % 100 113 80 - 120 120
Endrin 105 10.0 % 100 105 80 - 120 120
4,4'-DDD 113 10.0 % 100 113 80 - 120 120
Endosulfan II 104 10.0 % 100 104 80 - 120 120
4,4'-DDT 111 10.0 % 100 111 80 - 120 120
Endrin ketone 112 10.0 % 100 112 80 - 120 120
LCS 1
alpha-BHC 92.1 10.0 % 100 92 60 - 140
Heptachlor 108 10.0 % 100 108 60 - 140
Aldrin 92.7 10.0 % 100 93 60 - 140
Heptachlor epoxide 97.4 10.0 % 100 97 60 - 140
gamma-Chlordane 91.6 10.0 % 100 92 60 - 140
Endosulfan I 97.9 10.0 % 100 98 60 - 140
4,4'-DDE 91.0 10.0 % 100 91 60 - 140
Dieldrin 94.1 10.0 % 100 94 60 - 140
Endrin 105 10.0 % 100 105 60 - 140
4,4'-DDD 93.8 10.0 % 100 94 60 - 140
Endosulfan II 95.0 10.0 % 100 95 60 - 140
4,4'-DDT 95.2 10.0 % 100 95 60 - 140
Endrin ketone 94.7 10.0 % 100 95 60 - 140
Surrogate: TCMX 108.60 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 115.66 % 30 - 135
LCSD 1
alpha-BHC 90.4 10.0 % 100 90 60 - 140 1.86 140
Heptachlor 107 10.0 % 100 107 60 - 140 0.85 140
Aldrin 91.4 10.0 % 100 91 60 - 140 1.40 140
Heptachlor epoxide 97.0 10.0 % 100 97 60 - 140 0.36 140 gamma-Chlordane 90.3 10.0 % 100 90 60 - 140 1.47 140
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
34 of 41
Analyte
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC
Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512018 - EPA 8081
Endosulfan I 97.5 10.0 % 100 97 60 - 140 0.44 140
4,4'-DDE 89.3 10.0 % 100 89 60 - 140 1.90 140
Dieldrin 93.0 10.0 % 100 93 60 - 140 1.14 140
Endrin 103 10.0 % 100 103 60 - 140 2.22 140
4,4'-DDD 93.1 10.0 % 100 93 60 - 140 0.77 140
Endosulfan II 95.6 10.0 % 100 96 60 - 140 0.60 140
4,4'-DDT 94.9 10.0 % 100 95 60 - 140 0.31 140
Endrin ketone 95.6 10.0 % 100 96 60 - 140 0.88 140
Surrogate: TCMX 99.20 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 108.09 % 30 - 135
Method Blank 1
alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg
Surrogate: TCMX 97.08 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 103.08 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
LCSD 1
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
35 of 41
Analyte
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC
Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512054 - EPA 8081
CCV 1
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
alpha-BHC 97.5 10.0 % 100 97 80 - 120 120
Heptachlor 104 10.0 % 100 104 80 - 120 120
Aldrin 101 10.0 % 100 101 80 - 120 120
Heptachlor epoxide 101 10.0 % 100 101 80 - 120 120
gamma-Chlordane 99.6 10.0 % 100 100 80 - 120 120
Endosulfan I 102 10.0 % 100 102 80 - 120 120
4,4'-DDE 99.0 10.0 % 100 99 80 - 120 120
Dieldrin 99.4 10.0 % 100 99 80 - 120 120
Endrin 98.3 10.0 % 100 98 80 - 120 120
4,4'-DDD 97.5 10.0 % 100 97 80 - 120 120
Endosulfan II 96.6 10.0 % 100 97 80 - 120 120
4,4'-DDT 96.2 10.0 % 100 96 80 - 120 120
Endrin ketone 97.8 10.0 % 100 98 80 - 120 120
LCS 1
alpha-BHC 80.3 10.0 % 100 80 60 - 140
Heptachlor 88.3 10.0 % 100 88 60 - 140
Aldrin 85.0 10.0 % 100 85 60 - 140
Heptachlor epoxide 86.8 10.0 % 100 87 60 - 140
gamma-Chlordane 83.0 10.0 % 100 83 60 - 140
Endosulfan I 89.1 10.0 % 100 89 60 - 140
4,4'-DDE 83.2 10.0 % 100 83 60 - 140
Dieldrin 83.4 10.0 % 100 83 60 - 140
Endrin 76.6 10.0 % 100 77 60 - 140
4,4'-DDD 81.5 10.0 % 100 81 60 - 140
Endosulfan II 84.2 10.0 % 100 84 60 - 140
4,4'-DDT 79.4 10.0 % 100 79 60 - 140
Endrin ketone 87.2 10.0 % 100 87 60 - 140
Surrogate: TCMX 96.62 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 95.05 % 30 - 135
LCSD 1
alpha-BHC 75.1 10.0 % 100 75 60 - 140 6.75 140
Heptachlor 83.8 10.0 % 100 84 60 - 140 5.27 140
Aldrin 73.1 10.0 % 100 73 60 - 140 15.07 140
Heptachlor epoxide 82.4 10.0 % 100 82 60 - 140 5.22 140 gamma-Chlordane 78.2 10.0 % 100 78 60 - 140 5.88 140
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
36 of 41
Analyte
EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC
Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512054 - EPA 8081
Endosulfan I 84.4 10.0 % 100 84 60 - 140 5.41 140
4,4'-DDE 77.6 10.0 % 100 78 60 - 140 6.98 140
Dieldrin 79.2 10.0 % 100 79 60 - 140 5.18 140
Endrin 75.4 10.0 % 100 75 60 - 140 1.57 140
4,4'-DDD 80.3 10.0 % 100 80 60 - 140 1.52 140
Endosulfan II 83.0 10.0 % 100 83 60 - 140 1.45 140
4,4'-DDT 77.9 10.0 % 100 78 60 - 140 1.83 140
Endrin ketone 84.0 10.0 % 100 84 60 - 140 3.80 140
Surrogate: TCMX 86.46 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 90.57 % 30 - 135
Method Blank 1
alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg
beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg
Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg
delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg
Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg
Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg
gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg
alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg
4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg
Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg
4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg
4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg
Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg
Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg
Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg
Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg
Surrogate: TCMX 96.47 % 30 - 135
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 96.14 % 30 - 135
Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
LCSD 1
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
37 of 41
Notes and Definitions
ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit RPD Relative Percent Difference
E Estimated Concentration; concentration exceeds calibration range.

LCC Leak Check Compound
MDL Compound Reported to Method Detection Limit
1 Recovery outside of acceptable limits. LCS/LCSD recoveries and %RSD were within QC limits, therefore data was accepted.

SMSR Sample matrix prevented adequate surrogate recovery.

J Value less then PQL but greater than MDL.

HHSR High hydrocarbon concentration in this sample prevented adequate surrogate recovery.

SMTAR Sample matrix prevented adequate recovery of target analytes.

OV Sample wasfiltered in the lab before extraction.

HHTAR High hydrocarbon concentration prevented in-range recovery of target analytes.

IHRPD Target analyte recoveries were outside of range but accepted due to passing RPDs AROL Target analyte recovery exceeded recovery range but was accepted due to ND of that analyte in MB and sample(s).

ISO-H Isomers could not be sufficiently chromatographically resolved according to method requirements due to hydrocarbon interference or other matrix effects. The isomers' reported individual concentrations were each calculated as the average of each of the individual isomers' concentrations.
2 Recovery outside of acceptable limits for either LCS or LCSD. CCV and LCS or LCSD recoveries were within limits; therefore data was accepted.
3 RPD outside of acceptable limits. Target analyte recoveries were within QC limits; therefore, data was accepted. 4 LCS and/or LCSD recoveries exceeded acceptability ranges. Target analyte recoveries were accepted due to passing CCV, in-range LCS/LCSD RPDs, and a clean MB in which all target analytes were < RL. 5 MS and/or MSD recoveries exceeded acceptability ranges. Target analyte recoveries were accepted due to passing CCV, in-range LCS/LCSD RPDs, and a clean MB in which all target analytes were < RL.

SMTAR Sample matrix prevented adequate recovery of target analytes.

RV Surrogate recovery outside of control limits due to required dilution.

ASP Hydrocarbons in this sample most closely resemble asphalt. @ Surrogate is outside acceptable limits. All other QC parameters in control, therefore data was accepted.

S Sample was subjected to elemental sulfur cleanup by EPA 3660B.

TIC Tentatively Identified Compound. Compound is not in the calibration mix and does not have a valid calibration. All reported detections are estimated.

Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
11007 FOREST PLACE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
714-449-9937 PHONE
562-646-1611 FAX
Colby Wakeman
Lab Director
38 of 41
TH1 This sample was analyzed outside the recommended EPA holding time.

YP Associated CCV outside of control limits low.

IB CCV recovery above limit; analyte not detected
LO MS and/or MSD result unavailable. Batch accept. based on LCS rec.

YQ Associated CCV outside of control limits high.

GN Surrogate recovery is outside of control limits
LG Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limits.

LH Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limits.

AZ Surr. recovery outside of acceptance limits due to matrix interf.

HN Low concentration matrix spike recovery out of limits HO High concentration matrix spike recovery out of limits M A matrix effect is present.

LR LCS recovery below method control limits.

TW LCS recovery exceeds control limit.

Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.

Stantec Consulting
735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Chacon Farms
185807160
Jim DeWoody
Reported
12/02/25 15:01
j'.2511-76 Pagel of '3
.
ct
·-
.
,
Stantec CHAIN OF CUSTODY Laboratory Project Number:

Client Name/Address:

Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project Manager:

Jim Dewoody
E-Mail Address:
[email protected]
'\ Analysis Required Turn Around Time:

Normal X
72 Hour:
48 Hour
909-335-6116
Laboratory:

Sa_Ampler'NNag:l

24 Hour
Same Day:

Jones Environmental
10260 Matern Place
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
714-449-9937
Stantec Project Number:
185807160
Project Name:

Chacon Farms
QJ
a.

E
V"l'
"O
c"t'
ID'
u"'

0. 0
' .... C
Other:
ample Temp ·c:•'{
T-"\
Sample Description/Identification Sample Matrix Preservative # of Sample Date Sample Time .... 00 QJ 0 .... (see below) Cont. != 0 u._ \0 0 0 00 ::c Special Instructions At-o. 4// I ( Ill,.....f.::- a }( ,<. - ()(.f\.

A-2- 11?
A 3 ·OL
' 73
n,W
,'.... ,

-OC l1....
-oo
.A I -
A.2-
/2f/'J
l?T'f
J'.._
)(
_o
_,-4(;
A-
Bl -,:J.
/'J1r;'n
cx;1,
X
,< -OC ID
-o( 1
'R?-A . .z;- B'3-IJ.
;o, l -
R2-
/'J,e;'S
/) 7l('-/
/:J4'I
t!)}!a:)
>'---- >'-
)(
?'--
)<
X.
-t:JO g
_ DO l\.
-\.0
-"'
r:?-
/' -b,,;- n74.(p
/l} :><
,1<..
..x -,u - -D\ ;

' '
Time -
cz-o,, ' I OSI02 7-" ,,,<.. -"\
C3 -t!!),s ' /J7'; X -o,
Sample Preservative: l=ICE - 2=HCI - 3=H2S04 - 4=HN03 - 5=NaOH - 6=0ther:

SpecialInstructions: Contact PM for additional follow-on analysis. Prelims to PM when available. /?..J" - ..... /2. / I
Relinquished B /.....-r / ./ _,/,
/ /
Date
Time Received By+ Company Name:
_/ Time
Mitchell/ --:;.-...,.- ...r/
Relinisneo t,>f,flyName:
/ /2 .Ar '..PIJ,- '"a... /
- -,z ;... IIJ/z1/4_-«-/3<!2- Date' Time
;:::z:..:- °:J;;/4/ l'1\1 Re,rn:;;;;cyN !t:fJ 1112,,1 It-f.: t1 fiyirnquished By+ Con}lll!ny Namv Date Time Receivedy+ Company Name: V Date T3im4eof 41 Stantec Laboratory Project Number:

CHAIN OF CUSTODY j254:1·J6 Page 2. of":,
.
-o.
f.:""'7
-"
ro
Client Name/Address:

Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
909-335-6116
Laboratory:

Jones Environmental
10260 Matern Place Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Project Manager:

Jim Dewoody
E-Mail Address:
[email protected]
SarJ/;?L
Stantec Project Number:
185807160
I\. Analysis Required
QJ
C.

Turn Around Time:

Normal X
72 Hour:
48 Hour
24 Hour
Same Day:

Other:
)ample Temp •c:lo.
714-449-9937 Project Name:

Chacon Farms
E
Vl c"t
' "O CD
u"'
Q.
0 c
'
t 0
"iA
Sample Description/Identification
( -
Sample Matrix
,,: (
Preservative
(see below)
{
# of
Cont.

I
Sample Date
.

K/Zb/t.€,
Sample Time
,, Cj</ S<
QJ
±=
u:::
0 ....
0 \ti
....
00 0
00 ...
0 :I:
;( -o l\o
Special Instructions
C 2-.- o><-oL( ,,t -o \1
/-
n1 - 0, 5
.P2.-<
'iV- c;-
n, -
D?--:;
1) - c
_,,,,, sl.1")'7"3-$
?)'{2-{
05::J.C.
ffT
tJlfiZ..

2.ssIL'7",7
'o/'U
1')2-.
,?<-

)',....

"'7--
;(
><
..J....
x
:I--
--L_
;,(
X.

\
_;;,\(.\
-v l;l.b
.[ 11..\
-v IJ.2,,
D )./,
v!J'.\
-0 12.-S- _o b-\o
,::-
rt -
-

0, > lJ 72.C;
'14'2.'i'
){- r-- A.
-v l..1
-0 J.
t:"2..- \ \ \ l 11'1 < -v bA
Stantec Laboratory Project Number:

CHAIN OF CUSTODY j254:1·J6 Page 2. of":,
--
/
Time
Date Time Received By+ Company Name:'j °;ik1ITime
-'? ' ' '1'2-8" ✓ -v 11.0
Sample Preservative: l=ICE - 2=HCI - 3=H2SO4 - 4=HNO3 - 5=NaOH - 6=Other:

Special Instructions: Contact PM for additional follow-on analysis. Prelims to PM when available.

Mitchell 8_/
/_/_.,,.
.,,
/7 I/ /4_.//-z_.1;> /L_ ;,'//'L -/'I/ _?7-
Relit# Di//2; IY'. Date (
leivrvit.?!ftne: \f,V\{;_J Time
Jl fl IJ.,I I1/5,-- 1icll
Relinquished By+ Cny Nam1/ Date Time Received By +ympany Name: Date T3im5eof 41 Relinquished Bv: ,,.,,.

Stantec Laboratory Project Number:

CHAIN OF CUSTODY j'.254478 Page·of3
cc
ID
Client Name/Address: Project Manager: '\ Analysis Required Turn Around Time:

Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
714-449-9937
Sample Description/Identification Sample Matrix
Project Name:

Chacon Farms
Preservative # of Sample Date Sample Time
Q)
E
ro
Vl
-0
.

Q
..
)
. Q) .!=.

Ill
'
0 ...
u
Ill
Q.
0 .
.. .

C....
t,ample Temp °C: -
1""...'l
r.1--o.,
pz,,.. o.

F ,_.
-
,..,_",;
,'/
(see below) Cont.
-
I 11,':,:._/·-:; ?}197
?7
1)7(
u::: 0
rJ<- 'y
0 00
A
"
/(:
'.
0 ::c
-() \
--0
-o[;
Special Instructions
Fl -:.; \ X -· 3'{
r::.2....--
' \J I\J /lx.:;7- r- ...,v -
F3r'3 A,•/ I I 11/24/'9'
' /172.3 )< -n .3\o
Sample Preservative: 1-ICE - 2=HCI - 3-H2S04 - 4-HN03 - 5-NaOH - 6-Other:

Special Instructions: Contact PM for additional follow-on analysis. Prelims to PM when available.

00 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Jim Dewoody Normal X 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 E-Mail Address: 72 Hour:

San Bernardino, CA 92408 [email protected] 48 Hour 909-33S-6116 Sampler Name: 24 Hour
Laboratory: Same Day:

Jones Environmental Stantec Project Number: Other:
10260 Matern Place 185807160 a.

Stantec Laboratory Project Number:

CHAIN OF CUSTODY j'.254478 Page·of3
Rec
- - - /
Relinquished s✓ .// /4 A
Mitchel---- X - ///9
r¾/21h: Time/01-. Received+ <:'mpa1Namy . '/"#Y'-.-:.... licne
Da;;/4f 1..3"2-
Relin6ef,'ecfBy -t'co1iimanyme: [2a'f€'
<Time ftt:,1 :

ffU7 .,_ , Date' Time
7/Jo'N/5
R6nquished By+ CoptSany Name(/ Date ' Time Received BCmpany Name: Date T3im6eof 41 ;C... / ,/:/?-/
:m? e:
1Jl2AJ Jl,Cl1
37 of 41
Customer Name: Stantec Consulting
Purchase Order:

Project ID: Chacon Farms
Comment:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 9:06 AM
Quantity:

Comment:
1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 11/21/25 4:19 PM
Test Test Group Method Due Date Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-002 Customer Sample #: A2-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:53 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Customer Name: Stantec Consulting
Purchase Order:

Project ID: Chacon Farms
Comment:

Order ID:

Order Date:

J254478
11/21/2025
38 of 41
Sample #: J254478-003 Customer Sample #: A3-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:49 AM
Quantity:

Comment:
1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 11/21/25 4:19 PM
Test Test Group Method Due Date Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-007 Customer Sample #: B1-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 12:00 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-008 Customer Sample #: B2-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:58 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-009 Customer Sample #: B3-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:44 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-013 Customer Sample #: C1-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 9:16 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
Customer Name: Stantec Consulting
Purchase Order:

Project ID: Chacon Farms
Comment:

Order ID:

Order Date:

J254478
11/21/2025
39 of 41
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-014 Customer Sample #: C2-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 8:02 AM
Quantity:

Comment:
1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 11/21/25 4:19 PM
Test Test Group Method Due Date Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-015 Customer Sample #: C3-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:36 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-019 Customer Sample #: D1-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 9:21 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-020 Customer Sample #: D2-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 8:26 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Customer Name: Stantec Consulting
Purchase Order:

Project ID: Chacon Farms
Comment:

Order ID:

Order Date:

J254478
11/21/2025
40 of 41
Sample #: J254478-021 Customer Sample #: D3-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:30 AM
Quantity:

Comment:
1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 11/21/25 4:19 PM
Test Test Group Method Due Date Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-025 Customer Sample #: E1-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 9:26 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-026 Customer Sample #: E2-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 8:32 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-027 Customer Sample #: E3-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:20 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-031 Customer Sample #: F1-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 9:32 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
Customer Name: Stantec Consulting
Purchase Order:

Project ID: Chacon Farms
Comment:

Order ID:

Order Date:

J254478
11/21/2025
41 of 41
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-032 Customer Sample #: F2-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 8:37 AM
Quantity:

Comment:
1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 11/21/25 4:19 PM
Test Test Group Method Due Date Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025
Sample #: J254478-033 Customer Sample #: F3-0.5 Site:

Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:21 AM
Quantity:

Comment:

Test
1 Matrix: Soil
Test Group
Date Received:

Method
11/21/25
Due Date
4:19 PM
Priority
Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025
OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025

SAMPLE CONDITION RECORD

1. Are the samples within correct temperature criteria? (0 - 6°C) No

2. If not within temp. criteria, were samples received on ice? Yes

3. If not within temp. criteria, were samples received on same day of sampling? No

4. Is the Chain of Custody (COC) received filled out completely? Yes

5. Does the total number of containers received match COC? Yes

6. Are the sample container label(s) consistent with COC? Yes

7. Are the sample container(s) intact and in good condition? Yes

8. Were the proper containers & sufficient volume for analyses requested on COC? Yes

9. Was the proper preservative indicated on COC/container for analyses requested? Yes

10. Are the containers for volatile analysis free of headspace? (EPA 8260 water) N/A EDF Requested No
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses

Page 99 ends

San Jacinto City CouncilAugust 4, 2026

San Jacinto City Council
August 4, 2026