Agenda packet — San Joaquin City Council, June 3, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

SAN JOAQUIN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
21991 COLORADO AVE (A)

SAN JOAQUIN, CA
TUESDAY, JUNE 3, 2025
6:00 P.M.

MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL WILL BE IN ATTENDANCE AT THE MEETING.

MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING

IN PERSON OR BY ZOOM OR SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS AT CITY HALL OR BY EMAIL PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT [email protected].

ZOOM INFORMATION:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89165465055?pwd=48r71rdAhJN1cNAKDzLl9gzSMDUKtJ.1 MEETING ID: 891 6546 5055
PASSCODE: 903003
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-669-900-9128
The City Council welcomes you. All attendees are advised that pagers, cell phones, and any other communication devices should be powered off upon entering the Council meeting.

The City Council may consider and act on an agenda item in any order it deems appropriate. Actual timed items may be heard later but not before the time set on agenda. Persons interested in an item listed on the agenda are advised to be present throughout the meeting to ensure their presence when the item is called.

For each agenda item considered by the Council there will first be a staff presentation followed by a presentation from the involved individuals. Public comments from those in attendance will then be taken. All public comments will be limited to three minutes per person.

1. CALL TO ORDER – PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Adam Flores-Cornejo Mayor
Martha Mejia Mayor Pro Tem
Cristina Covarrubia Councilmember
Abel Lua Councilmember
Rosa M. Ramirez Councilmember

2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA –

3. PRESENTATION –
______________________________________________________________ 21900 Colorado Avenue, P.O. Box 758, San Joaquin, CA 93660 (559) 693-4311, (559) 693-2193 (fax), www.cityofsanjoaquin.org A. Westlands Water District to present a scholarship to Tranquillity High School Student Juan Mendoza
B. Presentation by Kendall Flint of DKS Associates regarding Measure C (Enclosure P. 1, Informational Only)

4. PROCLAMATION –

5. CONSENT CALENDAR –
All items listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. For discussion of any Consent Item, it will be considered separately at the request of any member of the City Council or any person in the audience - A. SUBJECT: Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 6, 2025.

RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 6, 2025. (Enclosure P. 13, Action Item)
B. SUBJECT: Warrants #’s 056230-056317.

RECOMMENDATION: Council approve Warrant #’s 056230-056317 as presented. (Enclosure P. 17, Action Item) C. SUBJECT: Continuing FY 2024-25 Expenditures and Revenues In Lieu of a Timely 2025-26 Budget.

RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-24 Continuing Expenditures and Revenues in Accordance with the 2024-25 City Budget in Lieu of a Timely 2025-2026 Budget. (Enclosure P. 28, Action Item) D. SUBJECT: Adopt a resolution supporting AB 1012 – A State Law to secure the efficiency of transportation funding and implementing a timely use of federal/state funding under the federal surface transportation act for the projects submitted to Fresno Council of Governments for the 2025 Call for Project.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopts the attached Resolution No. 2025-25 supporting the implementation of AB 1012 “Timely Use of Funding”. (Enclosure P. 31, Action Item)

6. SHERIFF REPORT – Informational Only

7. CITY MANAGER REPORT – Informational Only

8. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT – Informational Only

9. COUNCILMEMBER COMMUNICATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/AGENDA
ITEMS –
This portion of the meeting is reserved for the Mayor and Councilmembers (i) to make brief reports on boards, committees, and other public agencies, and at public events, (ii) to initiate new matters and to request updates, (iii) and to initiate new agenda items.

Under this section the Council may take action only on items specifically agendized and which meet other requirements for actions.

10. PUBLIC FORUM –
This part of the meeting is for members of the public to address the City Council regarding items that are not listed on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin. If you wish to comment on an item which is not on the agenda, you may do so at this time and each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.

Speakers are asked, but not required, to state their name and address and to use the microphone. The Council is prohibited by law from taking action on items not on the agenda. Discussion shall be limited to referring the item to staff and possible scheduling on a future council agenda.

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS –
A. SUBJECT: Public Hearing Regarding Tentative Tract Map No. 6456 to Subdivide APN-033-040-50 into 38 Single Family lots including a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Zone District Change.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council (i) Adopt Resolution No.2025-27 Adopting The Main Street Townhomes Project Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration (Is-MND) and General Plan Amendment for a Land Use Designation Change From Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential; (ii) Introduce Ordinance No. 2025-01 Amending Sections 71.08, 154.004, 154.062 and 153.071 of the San Joaquin Municipal Code and Approving the Rezoning Of APN 033-040-50 from R-1 Zone Designation to R-2 Zone Designation; and (iii) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-26, approving the Tentative Tract Map 6456 to create 38 single family lots with shared roof townhomes as shown in Exhibit B of the TTM resolution. The City’s Planning Commission recommended approval of the above at their May 6, 2025. (Enclosure P. 34, Action Item)
B. SUBJECT: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin, California, confirming Diagram and Assessments for the Annual Levy for 2025-2026 of Assessment District No. 92-3. (Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).

RECOMMENDATION: Council Conduct a public hearing to receive testimony regarding proposed 2025-2026 assessments for the City of San Joaquin’s Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 92-3 and Adopt Resolution 2025-28 confirming the diagram and assessments for the annual levy of the City of San Joaquin’s Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 92-3 for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and direct the Deputy City Clerk to file the annual Engineer’s Report with the County of Fresno, California. (Enclosure P. 158, Action Item)

12. SAN JOAQUIN PLANNING COMMISSION –

13. OLD BUSINESS –

14. NEW BUSINESS –
A. SUBJECT: Council authorization to use State Water Resources Control Board Funds to enter into an Agreement with Watermill Express, LLC and establishing a policy for use of tokens to provide clean potable water to Community.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-29 Approving a Policy for the use of funds per State Budget Act of 2024 for Clean Drinking Water Dispensing Facility and Approving Agreement with Watermill Express, LLC. (Enclosure P. 201, Action Item)
B. SUBJECT: Awarding the Project to Rehab Parts of the Leo Cantu Community Center.

RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-30 Approving the Partial Rehab of the Leo Cantu Community Center and Awarding Contract to The Lopez Construction Family, LLC. (Enclosure P. 215, Action Item) C. SUBJECT: Amendments to Yard Sale Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That Council waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No 2025-02, amending Chapter 114 of Title IX of the San Joaquin Municipal Code Relating to Yard Sale Regulations. (Enclosure P. 227, Action Item)

15. CLOSED SESSION –
A. Pursuant to Government Code §54957(b)(1)
Public Employee Performance Evaluation
Employee: City Manager

16. ADJOURN MEETING –
NOTICE OF ADA COMPLIANCE: If you or anyone in your party needs assistance in order to attend the City Council meeting, or if you require auxiliary aids or services, e.g. hearing aids or signing services to make a presentation to the City Council, the City is happy to assist you. Please contact City Office at (559) 693-4311 so such aids or services can be arranged. Request may also be made by email to the City Clerk at [email protected] or mailed to San Joaquin City Hall, P.O. Box 758, San Joaquin, CA 93660. Accommodations should be requested as early as possible as additional time may be required in order to provide the request accommodation is suggested.

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF AGENDA MATERIALS: Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding within 72 hours of the meeting regarding any items on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall, 21900 Colorado Avenue during normal business hours and on the City’s website at www.cityofsanjoaquin.org
LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE. Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt Code Section 84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the City Council is required to disclose on the record any campaign contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $250 made by the party or the party’s agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official.

Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well.

The disclosure should be made when the agenda item is called and must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution, the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made. Council Members are also required to make such disclosures and recuse themselves.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST. City Council Members with a conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act are required to make disclosure when the item is called and recuse themselves.

CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I, Matt Flood, City Clerk of the City of San Joaquin, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the regular San Joaquin City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 3, 2025 was posted at the following locations: City Hall, 21900 Colorado Avenue, San Joaquin Senior Center, 21991 Colorado Ave (B) and US Post Office 8667 Ninth Street on Friday, May 30, 2025 by 5:00 P.M. *NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULED TUESDAY, JULY 1, 2025* Measure C
Update
June 3, 2025
MeasureC2026.com
1 MEASURE G 6
f!tFCTA IIUS.NO COUNTl' t•ANSl'Oft1Art0lt AU1HOltr1l'
Measure C Is Not A New Tax – It’s A
Plan To Keep Fresno County Moving
• Renewing Measure C does not create a new tax—
it simply continues a half-cent sales tax that has funded billions of transportation improvements since 1986.
• This funding is to maintain our roads, public transit, and infrastructure.
• Without it, road maintenance and transportation projects could be delayed or cut, making travel less safe and
efficient.
2 Measure C = Over $10 Billion for
Transportation Investments
• Measure C has raised over $2.1 billion in local funds, which was leveraged to bring in an additional $8 billion from state and federal sources.
• These funds have supported road repairs, airport upgrades, public transit, and highway expansions.
3 Measure C Costs the Average
Household About $8 Per Month
• Fresno County households contribute about $8 a month to Measure C through everyday shopping on taxable items.
• This pays for local road maintenance.
• If Measure C is not renewed, the cost of fixing roads and transportation issues will be higher.
• Almost 25% comes from people visiting our county.
4 Steering Committee Focus
▪ Length of Measure C Renewal
▪ Revenue Allocation by Category
• Limited to Transportation Only
• Compliant with CA State Law
▪ Revenue Allocation by Agency
▪ Oversight Committee/
Reporting Requirements
5 plane on the runway
-generated content may be incorrect.
6 About v Contact Us v Renewal The Plans v Programs & Projects v Financial Reports v News v I MEASURE G· I
• Measure C has improved streets in San Joaquin
such as Nevada Street. It funded rehabilitation
projects on 9th and 11th Streets as well.
• Measure C funding also supported safety upgrades
for pedestrians and cyclists with new sidewalks,
bike paths, and multi-purpose trails throughout the
city.
• It will help planned projects such as the 2026
Railroad Street Improvements Project, which also
leveraged funds from the statewide CMAQ
Program.
• San Joaquin also gets state and federal grants by
providing matching funds.
$3.2
Million
7 Project Description
Street maintenance was completed on 9th, 77 t h, and Nevada Street s.

Project Location
• 9th, 77t h, and Nevada Streets
Project Photos
The Measure C Renewal Plan:

Reimagine
8 - .... ...
·--
9 Measure C v Meetings & Events Build A Plan Steering Committee FAQs Shi.re Your Input Measure C is Not a New Tax - It's a New Plan to
Keep Fresno County Moving
Renewing Measure C does not create a new tax-it continues an existing half-cent sales tax that has funded transportation improvements since 1986, generating $4 m illion per year. This funding helps maintain our roads and public transit and keeps infrastructure in good shape.

Measure C Has Brought More than $10 Billion to
Our Region
So far, Measure Chas raised over $2.l billion in local funds, which has helped bring in another $8 billion from state and federal sources. These funds have supported How Should We Use Measure C Funds?
A screenshot of a screen
AI-generated content may be incorrect.

A screenshot of a website
AI-generated content may be incorrect.
10 MEASURE
Measure
2026
C v
@ @) @ @ ~
Meetings & Events Build A Plan Steering Committee FAQs
Measure C is Not a New Tax - It's a New Plan to
Keep Fresno County Moving
Renewing Measure C does not create a new tax-it continues an existing half-cent sales tax that has funded transportation improvements since 1986, generating $4 million per year. This funding helps maintain our roads and public transit and keeps infrastructure in good shape.

How would you divide up the Measure C funds?
_______ __ - ,... ___ ,_._.,..,,00,.... O,,.,....,.ll)'<-.•---•-1.....-r~--~ .... , ______ .. _____ ,... .. ___ - ... ,.,._, _ -.- --.---... "'--'- .... -.....--.... _
a11---..~----- .. -.,... ....... -... --..... --~
-
~------ ·-- --
-·- _ ( ________ ., ___ --
.... _..,. __ , ___ ...... ___ --
...
....
...
....
....

Collaborative, Inclusive Outreach
MeasureC2026.com
Check for
Meetings!
11 23 JULY
®Virtua l via Zoom

WEDNESDAY
Virtual Measure
C Renewal
Community
Workshop
Virtua l via Zoom
Questions?
MeasureC2026.com
12 MEASURE G 6
f!tFCTA IIUS.NO COUNTl' t•ANSl'Oft1Art0lt AU1HOltr1l'

SAN JOAQUIN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES
TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2025
6:00 P.M.

1. CALL TO ORDER – PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Mayor Adam Flores-Cornejo Present
Mayor Pro Tem Martha Mejia Absent
Councilmember Cristina Covarrubia Present
Councilmember Abel Lua Present
Councilmember Rosa Maria Ramirez Present
The Meeting was called to order and the pledge of allegiance led by Mayor Flores-Cornejo at 6:00pm.

2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Councilmember Lua to approve the agenda, seconded by Councilmember Covarrubia. Motion passed 4-0 (Absent: Mejia).

3. PRESENTATION
A. Future Farmers of America (FFA) Students to provide a report of their recent activities.

Students from Tranquillity High School Reported on their Recent Activities.

4. PROCLAMATION

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. SUBJECT: Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of April 1, 2025.

RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of April 1, 2025.

B. SUBJECT: Warrants #’s 056112-056229.

RECOMMENDATION: Council approve Warrant #’s 056112-056229 as presented. ______________________________________________________________ 21900 Colorado Avenue, P.O. Box 758, San Joaquin, CA 93660 (559) 693-4311, (559) 693-2193 (fax), www.cityofsanjoaquin.org 13 C. SUBJECT: Approving the FY 25/26 List of Eligible Projects for Funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) created by Senate Bill (SB) 1 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, and Authorizing the City Manager to file with the California Transportation Commission the Project List and the Annual Expenditure Report for FY 25/26 RMRA Funding.

RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-19, approving the City of San Joaquin FY 25/26 List of eligible projects for funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account administered by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in partnership with the State Controller’s office, and authorizing the City Manager to file with the California Transportation Commission the Project List and Annual Expenditure Report for FY 25/26 RMRA Funding.

D. SUBJECT: Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin of intent to levy and collect the annual assessments for Assessment District No. 92-3, and setting a Public Hearing.

RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-20, to levy and collect the annual assessments for Assessment District No. 92-3, and setting a Public Hearing.

E. SUBJECT: One year Contract Extension for GPUSD School Resource Officer (SRO) for fiscal year 2025-26
RECOMMENDATION: Approve a one-year contract extension with the County of Fresno Sheriff’s Office for a SRO to continue at GPUSD
A motion was made by Councilmember Ramirez to adopt the Consent Calendar, seconded by Mayor Flores-Cornejo. Motion passed 4-0 (Absent: Mejia).

6. SHERIFF REPORT
Deputy Swain provided his monthly report.

7. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Cabrera provided her report.

8. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
The City Attorney had nothing to report.

9. COUNCILMEMBER COMMUNICATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/AGENDA ITEMS Councilmembers provided their reports.
14 10. PUBLIC FORUM
Comments were received from the public.

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
At 7:03pm the City Council recessed and the Planning Commission was convened.

12. SAN JOAQUIN PLANNING COMMISSION
A. SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Zoning Text Change, and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 6456 to Subdivide APN-033-040-50 into 38 Single Family lots, and associated mitigated negative declaration for the project (Property generally located north-west of Arizona and Main Streets).

RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt PC Resolutions 2025- 01, 2025-02, and 2025-03, recommending approval of a General Plan Amendment changing land use density from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, Rezoning from R-1 (Low Density Residential) to R-2 (Medium Density Residential, Zoning Text Change to adjust standards to allow for development, and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 6456 to Subdivide APN-033-040-50 into 38 Single Family lots, as well as a mitigated negative declaration under CEQA.

Mayor Flores-Cornejo opened the hearing at 7:09pm and, seeing no one interested in commenting, closed it in that same minute.

A motion was made by Councilmember Lua to approve the item, seconded by Councilmember Covarrubia. Motion passed 4-0 (Absent: Mejia).

At 7:10pm, the Planning Commission was adjourned and the City Council reconvened.

13. OLD BUSINESS

14. NEW BUSINESS
A. SUBJECT: Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin Amending the Agreement with Gouveia Engineering, Inc. for City Engineer Consultant Services and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Amendment.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-21, approving Amendment No. 3 to City Engineer Consultant Services Agreement with Gouveia Engineering, Inc. and authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3.

A motion was made by Councilmember Lua to approve the item, seconded by Councilmember Ramirez. Motion passed 4-0 (Absent: Mejia). 15 B. SUBJECT: Selection of Solid Waste Rate Study Consultant.

RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-22, approving the agreement with IGService for completion of a Solid Waste Rate Study and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.

A motion was made by Councilmember Ramirez to approve the item, seconded by Councilmember Lua. Motion passed 4-0 (Absent: Mejia).

C. SUBJECT: Resolution approving two Pipeline Crossing Agreements, Project No. 0799670 and Project No. 0799671 (Agreements) between the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the City of San Joaquin for the proposed waterline crossing below Railroad Property near the Pine Street Alignment and the proposed waterline crossing below Railroad Property at 9th Street, and Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreements and issue payment to Union Pacific Railroad Company.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-23, Approving two Pipeline Crossing Agreements, Project No. 0799670 and Project No. 0799671 (Agreements) between the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the City of San Joaquin for the proposed waterline crossing below Railroad Property near the Pine Street Alignment and the proposed waterline crossing below Railroad Property at 9th Street, and Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreements and issue payment to Union Pacific Railroad Company.

A motion was made by Councilmember Ramirez to approve the item, seconded by Mayor Flores-Cornejo. Motion passed 4-0 (Absent: Mejia).

D. SUBJECT: Council Discussion on the Yard Sale Ordinance.

RECOMMENDATION: Council discuss the current Yard Sale Ordinance and provide direction to staff on how to proceed.

Council provided direction to staff to draft an ordinance that increases flexibility by allowing non-profits to have yard sales more often.

15. CLOSED SESSION

16. ADJOURN MEETING
At 7:42pm with no other business remaining before the City Council, a motion was made by Mayor Flores-Cornejo to adjourn, seconded by Councilmember Lua. Motion passed 4-0 (Absent: Mejia).
16 17

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
Automatic Check Listing/Update
3PORT.: May 15 25 Thursday
JN.,,,: May 15 25 Time: 11:26
Jn By.: Cindy Torres Control Date.: 05/15/25 Cash Account No,,: 999 10110 1voice No Description
Check#.: 056231 Check Date.: 05/15/25
31050125- DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL
Invoice Actual
Date Period
Due Date Fiscal Tm --------
Vendor I.D.: ALHOl
05/14/25 05-25 A
05/15/25 11-25
Discount
G/L Account
------------
(SPARKLETTS)
100 39025
No
Gross
Amount

65.97 Check jj,: 056232 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: AQUOO (AQUA NATURAL SOLUTIONS) 5393- SERVICES FOR SEWER DEPARTMENT 05/08/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#,: 056233 Check Date,: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: AT&T6 (AT&T C50508- TELEPHONE SERVICES FOR 559,846.8083 05/08/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
2154.52

16.38 Discount
Amount
.00
.00
.00
Check#.: 056234 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: ATROO (ATR MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPAIR INC} )0000632- REPAIR JD310SJ BACKHOE FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 05/08/25 05-25 A 100 39025 1290.96 05/15/25 11-25
)0000633- REPAIR CAT226B SKID FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/08/25 05-25 A 100 39025 973.43 05/15/25 11-25
----------- H Vendor's Subtotal -----> 2264. 39
Check#.: 056235 Check Date,: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: BADOO (BADGER METER INC,) 30192861- BEACON SERVICES FOR APRIL 2025 WATER METERS 05/08/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
698.28
.00
.00
---------- ,00
.00
PAGE 001
ID # PY-CL
CTL. SAN
Net
Amount
65, 97
2154. 52
16 ,38
1290.96
973. 43
----------- 2264.39
698.28
Check#.: 056236 Check Date,: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D.: BLEOO (BLESSED APPLIANCE AIR CONDITIONING & HEA) C50514- REPAIR SERVICE FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 345,00 05/15/25 11-25
CC50514- SERVICE REPAIR FOR LCCC 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 300.00 05/15/25 11-25
----------- .. Vendor's Subtotal -----> 645.00
Check#.: 056237 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: BSKOl (BSK ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS) AI13359- WATER ANALYSIS 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 208. 4 5 05/15/25 11-25
AI13360- WATER ANALYSIS 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 104.52 05/15/25 11-25
----------- H Vendor's Subtotal -----> 312.97
Check#.: 056238 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: CALlO (CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICES) ~56089IN- WATER & WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATIONS 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
9733.44
Check #. : 056239 Check Date, : 05/15/25 Vendor I. D. : CAL PH (CALIFORNIA YOUTH OUTREACH) C50514- YOUTH INTERVENTION GANG PREVENTION 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
23328.44
Check#.: 056240 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: CINOO (CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2) 69739708- FIRST AID SUPPLIES FOR CITY FACILITIES 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
176.23
.00 345.00
.00 300,00
---------- ----------- .00 645.00
.00 208. 4 5
.00 104.52
---------- ----------- .00 312, 97
.00 9733.44
.00 23328.44
.00 176.23
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check#,: 056241 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: CLAOO {CLARK BROS INC,) C50515- PAYMENT #1 FOR PROJECT#l010034-005C WELL#4 & WELL6 05/15/25 05/15/25
A.YMENTffl- PROJECT# 1010034-004C FOR WELL #3 & WELL#5 05/15/25 05/15/25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
Vendor's Subtotal----->
243054.56
250654. 65
493709.21
.00
.00
.00
243054.56
250654.65
493709,21
18 8POR'l', : May 15 25 Thursday
UN... May 15 25 Time: 11:26 un By,: Cindy Torres

23. 60 .DO
Check#.: 056245 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: FDAOO [FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES) UNE 2025- EMPLOYEES HEALTH, DENTAL AND VISION INSURANCES 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
25244.93
Check ff,: 056246 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: FIRST (FIRST NATIONAL BANK OMAHA) C50509- PURCHASE SUPPLIES,SUBSCRIPTIONS & ALARMS SERVICES 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 2116.39 05/15/25 11-25
CC50509- SUBSCIPTIONS ' HOTEL FOR COUNCIL ' CITY MANAGER 05/09/25 05-25 A lOD 39025 2384.61 05/15/25 11-25
----------- .. Vendor's Subtotal-----> 4501. 00
Check#.: 056247 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: FREOl (FRESNO COUNTY TRE:ASURER) S022655- LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FOR APRIL 2025
Check #.' 056248 Check Date, : 05/15/25
S022655- CONTRACT POLICE SERVICES FOR APRIL 2025
S022656- CONTRACT POLICE SERVICES FOR GOLDEN PLAINS UNIFIED 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025
05/15/25 11-25
Vendor I.D.: FRES2 (FRESNO COUNTY
05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025
05/15/25 11-25
05/09/25 05-25 A lOD 39025
05/15/25 11-25
.. Vendor's Subtotal----->
Check#.: 056249 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: FROOl {FRONTIER) C50509- TELEPHONE SERVICES 559,693.3093 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#.: 056250 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: FR002 {FRONTIER) C50514- TELEPHONE SERVICES FOR 559.693.2051 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#.: 056251 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: FR003 (FRONTIER) C50509- TELEPHONE SERVICES FOR 559,693.2407 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#,: 056252 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: FR004 (FRONTIER) C50509- TELEPHONE SERVICES FOR 559.693.2509 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check ff,: 056253 Check Date,: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: FROGS (FRONTIER) C50509- TELEPHONE SERVICES FOR 559.693.0082 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/ 15/25 11-25
8333.33

TREASURER)
10951. 20
19722. 24
----------- 30673.44

90.17 205.93

81. 78

79. 05
79 .05
.DD
.DO
.OD
---------- .00
.DO
.DO
.OD
---------- .00
.OD
.OD
.DO
.DO
.00
PAGE
ID !f
CTL.
002
PY-CL
SAN
Net
Amount
36171,25
10590.06

23.60 25244. 93
2116.39
2384.61
----------- 4501.00
8333.33
10951.20
19722.24
----------- 30673.44

90.17 205.93

81. 78

79.05 79. 05
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check#,: 056254 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D.: GAROO (GARCIA TIRE & AUTO REPAIR} 22306- REPAIR A TIRE FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25

25.00 .DO 25,00
19 EPORT, : May 15 25 Thursday
UN.,,,: May 15 25 Time: 11:26
un By, : Cindy Torres

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
Automatic Check Listing/Update
Control Date,: 05/15/25 Cash Account No,.· 999 10110
Invoice Actual
Date Period
Discount Gross
nvoice No Description Due Date Fiscal Tm G/L Account No Amount Check !! , : 056255 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I .D,: GOUOl (GOUVEIA ENGINEERING INC) 17431- PROJECT: 305.03 SUTTER AVENUE ROW SURVEY
17444- PROJECT: 345.14D ELM AVE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
17450- PROJECT: 395.05 CMAQ APPLICATIONS
17451- PROJECT: 395.06 STBG APPLICATIONS
05/08/25
05/15/25
05/08/25
05/15/25
05/08/25
05/15/25
05/08/25
05/15/25
H
05-25 A
11-25
05-25 A
11-25
05-25 A
11-25
05-25 A
11-25
Vendor's
100 39025 520, 28
100 39025 3332,70
100 39025 4907.96
100 39025 1780.80
----------- Subtotal -----> 10541. 74
Check#.: 056256 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: HARRl (HARRALSON MACHINE WORKS} PRIL2025- PURCHASE SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/09/25 05-25 A 1D0 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#.: D56257 Check Date,: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: HERD? (HERNANDEZ, YUDIANA) C50514- REFUND DEPOSIT FOR 8/2/25 EVENT CANCEL 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
370,58
175 .. 00
Discount
Amount
,00
, 00
,00
,00
---------- ,00
,00
,00
Check#,: 056258 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: HOMOl (HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES) C50509- PURCHASE SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#,: 056259 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: IMAOO {IMAGE 2000) 768979- COST PER COPY FOR APRIL 2025 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
3337,10 ,00
184. 85 ,00
Check#.: 056260 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D,: INTOO (INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC.) 1189372- PLAN ADV CHECK FOR BP#3136 LOPEZ 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#.: 056261 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,; JAROD (JARVIS FAY LLP) 19753- PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS BID 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
620.96
3997.50
Check#.: 056262 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D,: JOHOl (JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC,) 87664836- REPAIR THERMOSTAT AT 22058 RAILROAD AVENUE 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
1320.63
Check#,: 056263 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D,: MACOO (MAC'S EQUIPMENT INC) 123947- PURCHASE SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25

23.65 Check#.: 056264 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: MONOl {MONTOY LAW CORPORATION) ARCH2025- PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES FOR MARCH 2025 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#.: 056265 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D,: NKOOO (NKOSI,JANINE) C50509- REFUND DEPOSIT FOR EVENT ON 5/3/25 AT VFW HALL 05/09/25 05-25- A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
3550,00
163,00
Check#.: 056266 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D,: OFFOl (ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC} C50509- PURCHASE OFFICE SUPPLIES
96145001- PURCHASE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPARTMENTS 97003001- PURCHASE SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 97005001- PURCHASE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPARTMENTS 97007001- PURCHASE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPARTMENTS 97009001- PURCHASE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPARTMENTS 70528001- PURCHASE SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/09/25
05/15/25
05/09/25
05/15/25
05/09/25
05/15/25
05/09/25
05/15/25
05/09/25
05/15/25
05/09/25
05/15/25
05/09/25
05/15/25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25

37.13 151. 55
635.30
1145. 64

57.54 64,98

79. 23
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
, 00
,00
,00
PAGE
ID j/
CTL.
003
PY-CL
SAN
Net
Amount
520.28
3332.70
4907,96
1780.80
----------- 10541. 74
370.58
175. 00
3337 .10
184 .85
620.96
3997.50
1320.63
23, 65
3550,00
163,00
37, 13
151. 55
635.30
1145. 64
57,54

64. 98
79,23
20 EPORT.

UN., ..
un By.

May 15 25 Thursday
May 15 25 Time: 11:26
Cindy Torres
nvoice No Description

CITY OE' SAN JOAQUIN
Automatic Check Listing/Update
Control Date.: 05/15/25 Cash Account No .. : 999 10110
Invoice Actual
Date Period
Discount Gross
Due Date Fiscal Tm G/L Account No Amount
Discount
Amount
Check n.: 056266 Check Date,: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: OFFOl (ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC) 88044001-
95970001-

PURCHASE OFFICE AND JANITORIAL SUPPLIES

PURCHASE OFFICE SUPPLIES
05/09/25
05/15/25
05/09/25
05/15/25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
** Vendor's Subtotal----->
689.40
332.92
3193.69
Check n.: 056267 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: PGEOl (PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC) C50514- UTILITIES SERVICES FOR CITY FACILITIES 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
5142.30
.00
.00
.00
.00
PAGE: 004
ID j/: PY-CL
CTL.: SAN
Net
Amount
689. 40
332.92
3193.69
5142. 30
Check fl,: 056268 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D.: PirNl (PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES L) 07216718- LEASE FOR POSTAGE METER SEND PRO C AUTO 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
449.12 .00 449.12
Check#.: 056269 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: REG02 (REGENERATE CALIFORNIA INNOVATION (RCI)) C50514- REFUND DEPOSIT FOR 5/18/25 EVENT CANCEL 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#,: 056270 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: RINOl (RINGCENTRAL INC,) 50001703- LEASE FOR CITY HALL PHONES FOR JUNE 2025 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#,: 056271 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: ROSOO (RSG, INC.) 13534- RSG 1485-SUCCESSOR AGENCY SERVICES 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
250.00
291. 45
343,75
Check#.: 056272 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: SAN02 (SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR) C372836- 25/26 ANNUAL PERMITS TO OPERATE AT CALIFORNIA AVE: 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
290.00
.00
.00
Check#.: 056273 Check Date,: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D,: SANK4 (SAN JOAQUIN INDIANS TRAVEL TEAM) C50515- YOUTH GRANT AWARD TO SAN JOAQUIN INDIANS TRAVEL 05/15/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#.: 056274 Check Date,: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D.: SEB03 (SEBASTIAN} 10830329- SECURITY ALARMS SERVICES FOR CITY FACILITIES 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#.: 056275 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D.: SEB05 (SEBASTIAN) 10832632- HIGH SPEED IN'fERNET li'OR CITY HALL 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check j/,: 056276 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D,: SEB06 (SEBASTIAN) 10831652- WIRELESS BROADBAND/HIGH SPEED INTERNET @ PW DEPT. 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#.: 056277 Check Date,: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D,: SEBO? {SEBASTIAN) 10832050- WIRELESS BROADBAND/HIGH SPEED INTERNET@ VFW HALL 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
2926.49 .00
349.75 .00
129.95 .00
199,90 .00

69.95 .00
250,00
291.45
343.75
290.00
2926,49
349.75
129.95
199.90

69.95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check#,: 056278 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D.: SEB08 (SEBASTIAN) 10830727- HIGH SPE:ED INTERNET FOR LCCC 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 239.85 .00 239.85 05/15/25 11-25
10831510- HIGH SPE:ED INTERNET FOR LCCC 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 129.95 .00 129.95 05/15/25 11-25
----------- ---------- ----------- Vendor's Subtotal -----> 369.80 .00 369.80 21 EPOR'f,
UN, ...
un By.

May 15 25 Thursday
May 15 25 Time: 11:26
Cindy Torres

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
Automatic Check Listing/Update
Control Date.: 05/15/25 Cash Account No .. : 999 10110
Invoice Actual
Date Period
Discount Gross
nvoice No Description Due Date Fiscal Tm G/L Account No Amount Check!/.: 056279 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D,: SEB09 (SEBASTIAN) 10830884- WIRELESS BROADBAND/HIGH SPEED INTERNET@ SC 05/09/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check ff.: 056280 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: SPAOO (SPARKLETTS) 79050925- DRINKING WATER FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
269.85
122, 98
Check ff,: 056281 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: STAU2 (STAN VIERRA ELECTRIC) 137397- REPAIR MANNING LIFT STATION 05/14/25 05-25 A 100.39025 05/15/25 11-25
5108.32
Discount
Amount
.00
.00
.00
Check ff.: 056282 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: SUP02 (SUPERIOR POOL PRODUCTS, LLC) Q2030651- PURCHASE SUPPLIES FOR WATER DEPARTMENT 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
6429.07
Check#.: 056283 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: THYOl (TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION) 08510267- ANNUAL INSPECTION ON HANDICAPP ELEVATOR@ VFW HALL 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
637.14
Check!/,: 056284 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: UNI08 {UNIFIRST CORPORATION) 80138002- UNIFORMS SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 165.51 05/15/25 11-25
80139272- UNIFORMS SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 160.98 05/15/25 11-25
----------- .. Vendor's Subtotal-----> 326. 49
.00
.00
.00
.00
---------- .00
Check ff.: 056285 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: VALDO (VALLEY FARM SUPPLY STORES INC,) 2Kl68315- PURCHASE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS & LLMD 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#.: 056286 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: VER03 (VERIZON WIRELESS) 11735650- WIRELESS PHONES FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS & STAFF 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
Check#.: 056287 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: WES22 (WEST SIDE PUMP CO) 2132781- PURCHASE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
2138874- REPAIR MANNING LIFT STATION 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25

54.05 1012.49
243 .17
5139. 62
----------- .. Vendor's Subtotal -----> 5382.79
. 00
.OD
.00
.00
---------- .00
PAGE 005
ID !I PY-CL

CTL, SAN
Net
Amount
2 69. 85
122.98
5108.32
6429.07
637 .14
165,51
160.98
----------- 326.49

54.05 1012.49
243 .17
5139.62
----------- 5382,79
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check It.: 056288 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I.D.: WESTl (WEST HILLS OIL) 265325- PURCHASE GASOLINE AND DIESEL FOR PUBLIC WORKS OEP'r 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 2336.56 .oo 2336.56 05/15/25 11-25
265474- PURCHASE GASOLINE FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/14/25 05-25 A 100 39025 1499.19 .00 1499,19 05/15/25 11-25
** Vendor's Subtotal-----> 3835.75 .oo 3835.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check#.: 056289 Check Date.: 05/15/25 Vendor I,D,: WEST3 {WESTSIDE FAMILY PRESERVATION SERVICES) C50512- REFUND DEPOSIT FOR EVENT ON 4/27/25 AT VFW HALL 05/12/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/15/25 11-25
** Total Checks Paid----->
175.00 .00
710848.51 .00
175. 00
710848.51
22 EPORT. May 15 25 Thursday
UN. May 15 25 Time: 11:26

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
Automatic Check Listing/Update
PAGE 006
IO II PY-CL un By. Cindy Torres CTL, SAN
G/L Account No
--------------
100 20000
105 20000
201 20000
202 20000
205 20000
210 20000
221 20000
280 20000
500 20000
510 20000
871 20000
874 20000
877 20000
880 20000
999 10110
ct, G/L Account No
-------------- 210 100 20000
215 100 20000
330 510 20000
General Ledger Accounts Summary for May 15, 2025
Accounting Period is May, 2025
'l'otal Amount Extension
------------- ------------- 35055.80 35055.80
2101.52 37157.32
1803.17 38960.49
5132.31 44092. BO
3652.20 47745.00
5720.28 53465.28
8333.33 61798.61
908.87 62707.48
28229.08 90936.56
31452,29 1223B8,85
51109. 62 173498,47
3332.70 176831. 17
139.38 176970.55
533877.96 710848, 51
-710848,51 .00
Total Amount Extension
------------- ------------- 1055, 47 1055 .47
1655.75 2711.22
10247.94 12959.16
FUND Description ACCT Description DEPT Description
GENERAL rnND

REFUSE-COMMERCI

MEAS C/STREET

MEAS C/FLEX

GAS TAX

LTF STRTS/ROADS
AB 1913/COPS

LANDSCAPE MAINT
WATER
SEWER
PUB SAFETY $2M

LEAP STREAMLINE

CYO CDBG
SRC
CASH CLE'.ARING
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Cash-Checking/United
FUND Description ACCT Description DEPT Description

GENERAL FUND

GENERAL FUND
SEWER
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
23 EPORT.: May 29 25 Thursday
UN.,,.: May 29 25 Time: 13:53 un By.: Cindy Torres
nvoice No Description

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
Automatic Check Listing/Update
Control Date,: 05/29/25 Cash Account No,,: 999 10110
Invoice Actual
Date Period
Discount Gross
Due Date Fiscal Tm G/L Account No Amount
Check#.: 056293 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D.: ADA01 {ADAMS ASHBY GROUP, INC.) 7164- LABOR COMPLIANCE FOR WELL #6 SRF FUNDING 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
2500.00
Discount
Amount
.00
PAGE: 001
ID II: PY-CL
CTL,: SAN
Net
Amount
2500.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check#.: 056294 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D.: AT&T2 (AT&T C50528- TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR 559.693.4311 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25

73. 07 .00 73,07
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check#,: 056295 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D,: BOGOO (BOGIE'S PUMP SYSTEMS) 19647- NEW MONITORING SYSTEM FOR ALL LIFTSTATIONS 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
14854.56 14854,56
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check#.: 056296 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D.: BUSOl (BUSO, ARIANE) C50528- REFUND DEPOSIT FOR EVENT ON 5/24/25 AT VFW HALL 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
Check#.: 056297 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D,: CALPI (CAL WEST RAIN) 229156IN- SERVICE CALL TO REPAIR AT MANNING LIFTSTATION 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
175.00
345.52
Check#.: 056298 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D.: COR01 [CORBIN WILLITS SYSTEMS) OC505151- ENHANCEMENT AND SERVICES FEES 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
692. 93
.oo 175.00
.00 345,52
.00 692.93
Check#.: 056299 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D.: DEL03 (DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC,) 90300753- LEASE FOR SHARP/MX-6071 AT CITY HALL 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
155.16 .00
Check#,: 056300 Check Date,: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D.: EWI01 (EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS INC,) 26102755- REPAIRS FOR PARKS 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025
05/29/25 11-25
26102878- PURCHASE SUPPLIES COR PW DEPARTMENTS 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
.. Vendor's Subtotal----->
Check#.: 056301 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D.: FR003 (FRONTIER) C50528- TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR 559,693,2407 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
607 .19 .oo
937. 03 .00
----------- ---------- 1544,22 .00

95. 72
155.16
607, 19
937,03
----------- 1544,22
95, 72
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check #.: 056302 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D.: GOUOl (GOUVEIA ENGINEERING INC) 17589- PROJECT: 305.03 SUTTER AVENUE ROW SURVEY 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 1314.50 .00 1314.50 05/29/25 11-25
17590- PROJECT: 310,03 DBE PLAN-ADA COMPLIANCE-QAP 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 513.19 .00 513.19 05/29/25 11-25
17591- PROJECT: 310.06 ADA SELF-EVALUATION 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 2076, 90 ,00 2076, 90 05/29/25 11-25
17592- PROJECT: 325.01 PUBLIC WORKS GENERAL 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 42.53 .00 42,53 05/29/25 11-25
17593- PROJECT: 340,13-1 WELL 6 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 18938. 10 .00 18938, 10 05/29/25 11-25
17594- PROJECT: 340.13-2 WELL 6 ADMINISTRATION 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 1150.00 .00 1150.00 05/29/25 11-25
17595- PROJECT: 340.14-2 WE:LL 3 ' 5 MANGANESE CONSTR MGMT 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 15420.85 ,00 15420.85 05/29/25 11-25
17596- PROJECT: 340.14-3 WELL 3 ' 5 MANGANESE ADMIN 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 1466.25 .00 1466.25 05/29/25 11-25
17597- t>ROJECT: 340.15-2 WELL 4 ' 6 MANGANESE CONSTR MGMT 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 13649.95 .00 13649.95 05/29/25 11-25
17598- PROJECT: 340.15-3 WELL 4 ' 6 MANGANESE ADMIN 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 1466.25 .00 1466,25 05/29/25 11-25
17599- PROJECT: 345.01 STREETS MISCELLANEOUS 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 2706,38 .00 2706.38 05/29/25 11-25
17600- PROJECT: 345.13D HSIPL-5245(020) PED CROSS SAFETY 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 20.25 .00 20.25 05/29/25 11-25
17601- PROJECT: 345.15 2023 SIDE:WALK INFILL IMP-l?RE-E76 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 86.63 .00 86. 63 05/29/25 11-25
17602- PROJECT: 345.16 RR AVENUE PAVING IMP-PRE-E76 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 86.63 .00 86.63 05/29/25 11-25
17603- PROJECT: 375.08 TRACT 6456 SUBDIVISION 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 255.15 .00 255.15 05/29/25 11-25
24 .8PORT.
,UN,,,.

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
Automatic Check Listing/Update .un By.

May 29 25 Thursday
May 29 25 Time: 13:53
Cindy Torres Control Date.: 05/29/25 Cash Account No,.: 999 10110 nvoice No Description
Invoice Actual
Date Period
Discount Gross
Due Date Fiscal Tm G/L Account No Amount
Check#.: 056302 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D,: GOUOl (GOUVEIA ENGINEERING INC} 17 604.- PROJECT: 385.10 DOLLAR GENERAL IMPROVE PLAN REVIEW 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 85.05 05/29/25 11-25
17 605- PROJECT: 390.02 ASSESSMENTS FOR LLMD 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 2030.70 05/29/25 11-25
----------- .. Vendor's Subtotal -----> 61309,31
Check#.: 056303 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D.: HEL04 (HELENA CHEMICAL COMPANY) 69624.885- PURCHASE SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
475 .10
Discount
Amount
.00
, 00
---------- .oo
, 00
Check#.: 056304. Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D.: MOUOO (MOUNTAIN VALLEY PEST CONTROL) 19342398- PEST CONTROL FOR CITY FACILITIES 05/28/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
275.00 .00
PAGE
ID I
CTL.
002
PY-CL
SAN
Net
Amount

85.05 2030.70
----------- 61309. 31
475,10
275.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check#.: 056305 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D,: PGEOO (PGE C50529- UTILITIES SERVICES FOR 23599 MANNING AVENUE 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25

23.82 23.82
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check #.: 056306 Check Date,: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D,: PGE04 (PGE C50529- UTILITIES SERVICES FOR 22394 W MANNING AVENUE 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
734,70 734.70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check#.: 056307 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D,: PGE05 (PGE C50529- UTILITIES SERVICES FOR 8599 EIGHTH STREET 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
Check ff,: 056308 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D,: PGE07 (PGE C50529- UTILITIES SERVICES FOR 8751 MAIN STREET 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
Check#.: 056309 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D,: PGE09 (PGE C50529- UTILITIES SERVICES FOR 22001 W MANNING AVENUE 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
Check#.: 056310 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D.: PGE12 (PG&E C50529- UTILITIES SERVICES FOR WATER TANK 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
Check#.: 056311 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D,: PUR02 {PURCHASE POWER} C50529- PURCHASE FUNDS FOR POSTAGE METER 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
Check#,: 056312 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D,: QUI02 {QUINN COMPANY) ·00599875- SERVICE OIL CHANGE FOR SKID STEER 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
546.01 .00

42.61 .00
1122.85 .00
8098. 64
2024.75 .00
213,53
Check #.: 056313 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D.: SANK4 (SAN JOAQUIN INDIANS TRAVEL TEAM) C50529- YOUTH GRANT AWARD TO SAN JOAQUIN INDIANS TRAVEL 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
6133.85
Check#.: 056314. Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I.D.: THE04 (THE SALVATION ARMY) ,PRIL2025- HOT MEALS FOR APRIL 2025 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
4400.24 ,00

54.6.01 42,61
1122 .85
8098. 64
2024. 75
213.53
6133,85
4400.24
25 ,EPORT. May 29 25 Thursday
,UN .... May 29 25 Time: 13:53 llD By. Cindy Torres
nvoice No Description

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
Automatic Check Listing/Update
Control Date.: 05/29/25 Cash Account No,,: 999 10110
Invoice Actual
Date Period
Discount Gross
Due Date Fiscal Tm G/L Account No Amount
Check#.: 056315 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D.: TSAOl (TSA CONSULTING GROUP) C50529- PAYROLL PERIOD 5/2/25 DEDUCTION FOR RETIREMENT
CC50529- PAYROLL PERIOD 5/16/25 DEDUCTION FOR RETIREMENT 05/29/25
05/29/25
05/29/25
05/29/25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
05-25 A 100 39025
11-25
** Vendor's Subtotal----->
150.00
150.00
300.00
Discount
Amount
.00
.00
.00
PAGE
ID ff
CTL,
003

PY-CL SAN
Net
Amount
150.00
150.00
300.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check#.: 056316 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor I,D,: UNI08 (UNIFIRST CORPORATION} 80140414- UNIE'ORMS SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 160.98 05/29/25 11-25
80141938- UNIFORMS SERVICES COR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 160.98 05/29/25 11-25
----------- H Vendor's Subtotal ----->
Check#.: 056317 Check Date.: 05/29/25 Vendor 1,0.: WESTl (WEST HILLS OIL) 265634- PURCHASE GASOLINE AND DIESEL FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPT 05/29/25 05-25 A 100 39025 05/29/25 11-25
** Total Checks Paid----->
321.96
1443.48
107902.03
.00 160,98
.00 160.98
---------- ----------- .00 321. 96
.00 1443,48
,00 107902.03
26 .EPORT. May 29 25 Thursday
.UN. May 29 25 Time: 13:53

CITY OE' SAN JOAQUIN
Automatic Check Listing/Update
PAGE 004
1D ii PY-CL
CTL. SAN .un By. Cindy Torres
G/L Account No
--------------
100 20000
105 20000
200 20000
201 20000
202 20000
205 20000
206 20000
210 20000
280 20000
500 20000
510 20000
851 20000
866 20000
871 20000
877 20000
879 20000
880 20000
999 10110
Ctr G/L Account No
-------------- 210 100 20000
215 100 20000
330 510 20000
General Ledger Accounts Summary for May 29, 2025
Accounting Period is May, 2025
Total Amount Extension
------------- ------------- 4728 .so 4728.50
406.88 5135. 38
2590.09 7725,47
132.52 7857.99
1986,13 9844.12

57.61 9901. 73
516.50 10418.23
2204.64 12622.87
2125.72 14748.59
9776.85 24525.44
17639.30 42164,74
8 6. 63 42251. 37
4400.24 46651. 61
6476.67 53128.28

95.72 53224.00
8 6. 63 53310.63
54591,40 107902, 03
-107902.03 • 00
Total Amount Extension
------------- ------------- 45.83 45. 83
1343. 70 1389, 53
345,52 1735.05
FUND Description ACCT Description DEPT Description

GENERAL FUND

REFUSE-COMMERCI
MEASURE "C" ADA

MEAS C/STREET

MEAS C/FLEX

GAS TAX
GAS TAX 2032

LTF STRTS/ROADS

LANDSCAPE MAINT
WATER
SEWER

RR AVE PAV IMP
(ARPA) CLE'RF
PUB SAFE:TY $2M

CYO CDBG

SIDEWALK INFILL
SRe

CASH CLEARING
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Cash-Checking/United
FUND Description ACCT Description DEPT Description
G8NERAL FUND

GENERAL FUND
SEWER
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
27 HAND CHECKS FOR MAY 2025

VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE PAY EXACTLY KllR34 KERWESTlNC. ADVERT FOR ORDINANCE NO, 24-02 56230 58 2025 $ 1,303.00 UNI01 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY PAYMENT FOR PR6rllCT NO. 0799670 56290 5 16 2025 $ 3,790.00 UNI01 UNION PACll'IC RAILROAD COMPANY PAYMENT FOR PRO'l!CT NO. 0799671 56291 5 16 2025 $ 3,840.00 GOU01 GOUVIA llNGJNllllRING INC PAYMENT FOR INVOlC!lS J/17445 & #17446 56292 521 2025 $ 602.18

STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL
June 3, 2025
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Matt Flood, Assistant City Manager/Finance Officer SUBJECT: Continuing FY 2024-25 Expenditures and Revenues In Lieu of a Timely 2025-26 Budget
Recommendation
That Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-24 Continuing Expenditures and Revenues in Accordance with the 2024-25 City Budget in Lieu of a Timely 2025-2026 Budget.

Executive Summary
Staff is requesting Council adopt Resolution 2025-24 in order to continue City operations while the 2025-26 Budget is being finalized.

Background
Staff continues to work on the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget and estimates that it might not be completed prior to the July 1st deadline. Therefore, staff is requesting Council adopt the attached resolution allowing for the continued expenditures for the regular operation of the City until the budget is adopted.
28 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN

CONTINUING EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2024-2025 CITY BUDGET IN LIEU OF TIMELY
2025-26 BUDGET ADOPTION

WHEREAS, the City Council duly passed the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget; and WHEREAS, adoption by the City Council of the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 operations budget will be delayed; and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2024- 2025 Budget will end on June 30, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it appropriate to continue the operation of the City services until the passage of the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget at a future meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Joaquin resolves as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council does hereby continue the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 annual budget in full force and effect through July 31, 2025, and authorizes spending in accordance with the levels prescribed in that balanced budget assuming revenues to offset expenditures.

3. Upon adoption of a resolution adopting the 2025-2026 Budget, this resolution shall have no further force and effect.

4. This resolution is effective upon adoption.
(Certification on next page)
29 The foregoing resolution was adopted at regular meeting of the City Council for the City of San Joaquin this 3rd day of June 2025 and passed at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Adam Flores-Cornejo, Mayor
ATTEST:

I, Matt Flood, City Clerk of the City of San Joaquin, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted and passed by the City Council at a regular meeting of said Council, held at the San Joaquin Council Chambers on June 3, 2025 by the following vote:
__________________________________________
Matt Flood, City Clerk
30 STAFF REPORT
Date: June 3, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Mario Gouveia, City Engineer
REVIEWED BY: Elizabeth Cabrera, City Manager
SUBJECT:

Adopt a resolution supporting AB 1012 – A State Law to secure the efficiency of transportation funding and implementing a timely use of federal/state funding under the federal surface transportation act for the projects submitted to Fresno Council of Governments for the 2025 Call for Project.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Council adopts the attached Resolution No. 2025-25 supporting the implementation of AB 1012 “Timely Use of Funding”.

BACKGROUND:

The Fresno Council of Governments (FCOG) initiated a Call for Projects on December 10, 2024.

FCOG is in the process of programming future federal funds for the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program. City Staff developed a list of potential projects that meet the funding requirements and grouped them into 2 potential funding applications. Funding applications for this Call for Projects were due to FCOG based on the following dates:
• CMAQ – March 21st, 2025 at 12:00pm
• STBG – March 3rd, 2025 at 12:00 pm
As part of the requirements for each application submitted to compete for funding, a resolution supporting and implementing AB 1012 “Timely Use of Funding” must be adopted by the City and a copy of the resolution provided to FCOG.

DISCUSSION:

FCOG administers Federal funding for local transportation projects. Funding is available from:
• STBG – Surface Transportation Block Grant Program: Typical roadway rehabilitation projects
• CMAQ – Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Projects that reduce traffic congestion and air pollution (i.e. transit improvements, clean fuel technology, traffic signals, pedestrian/bicycle facilities, etc.)
The Regional Bid projects will compete for the available STBG and CMAQ funds. These funds will be awarded to the member agencies of the Fresno Council of Governments, based on 31 competitive scoring of applications submitted by member agencies. Funding will be programmed for Federal Fiscal Years 2026/27 through 2029/30.

City Staff developed a list of potential projects to submit to FCOG where more than one project could be submitted for funding. City Staff ranked projects in order of priority. The proposed projects are listed below in the order of the proposed priority for each funding program.

STBG “Regional Bid” – Surface Transportation Block Grant Improvement

1. Colorado Ave and 9th St Intersection Imps
This is an intersection safety and maintenance project. The project improvements being proposed for this project are: pavement rehabilitation of the existing intersection and approaches, construction of bulb outs at each of the four corners, installation of stop lights with flashing beacons, and ancillary improvements.

CMAQ “Regional Bid” – Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement

1. California Ave and 9th St Ped Imps
This is an intersection safety project. The project improvements being proposed for this project are: construction of bulb outs at the corners, construction of a midblock bulb out, installation of RRFB’s, installation of flexible lane delineators, high visibility markings, and ancillary improvements.

2. Sutter Ave Pedestrian Improvements
This is a sidewalk infill project. The project improvements being proposed for this project are: the construction of the pedestrian improvements consisting of the construction of ramp, sidewalk, curb, and gutter improvements on the East side of Sutter Avenue, approximately 3,150 LF +/-.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All of the federally funded projects require a local match of 11.47%. The City can commit funds from its Measure C allocation or other available transportation funds. The proposed projects would be programmed for future fiscal years, which would allow the City time to plan for the expenditures.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2025–25
32 RESOLUTION NO. 2025- 25

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN SUPPORTINGTHE EFFICIENCY OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PER AB 1012 AND

IMPLEMENTING A TIMELY USE OF THE FEDERAL/STATE FUNDING UNDER THE FEDERAL

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR THE PROJECTS SUBMITTED TO FRESNO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE 2025 CALL FOR PROJECTS

WHEREAS, AB 1012 has been enacted into State Law in part to provide for the “timely use” of State and Federal funding; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Joaquin is able to apply for and receive Federal and State funding under the Federal Surface Transportation Act;
WHEREAS, the City of San Joaquin desires to ensure that its projects are delivered in a timely manner to preclude the Fresno Region from losing those funds for non-delivery; and WHEREAS, it is understood by the City of San Joaquin that failure for not meeting project delivery dates for any phase of a project may jeopardize federal or state funding to the Region; and WHEREAS, the City of San Joaquin must demonstrate dedicated and available local matching funds; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of San Joaquin City Council hereby agrees to ensure that all project delivery deadlines for all project phases will be met or exceeded.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that failure to meet project delivery deadlines may be deemed as sufficient cause for the Fresno Council of Governments Policy Board to terminate an agency’s project and reprogram Federal/State funds as deemed necessary.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of San Joaquin City Council does direct its management and engineering staffs to ensure all projects are carried out in a timely manner as per the requirements of AB 1012 and the directive of the City of San Joaquin City Council.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin the 3rd day of June, 2025 and passed at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES:

NOTES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.

Adam Flores-Cornejo, Mayor
of the City of San Joaquin
ATTEST:

I, Matthew Flood, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk of the City of San Joaquin, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted and passed by the City Council at a regular meeting of said City Council, held at the San Joaquin Council Chambers on June 3, 2025, by the following vote:

Matthew Flood, City Clerk
of the City of San Joaquin
33 STAFF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
June 3, 2025
TO: City Council
FROM: Elizabeth Cabrera, City Manager
SUBJECT: Public Hearing Regarding Tentative Tract Map No. 6456 to Subdivide APN-033- 040-50 into 38 Single Family lots including a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Zone District Change
Recommendation:

Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council conduct a public hearing and take action as follows:
1) Review and consider the analysis provided in the Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) (Exhibit A of the project resolutions) as the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Lead Agency; and
2) Approve:
(i) Adopt Resolution No.2025-27 Adopting The Main Street Townhomes Project Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration (Is-MND) and General Plan Amendment for a Land Use Designation Change From Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential;
(ii) Introduce Ordinance No. 2025-01 Amending Sections 71.08, 154.004, 154.062 and 153.071 of the San Joaquin Municipal Code and Approving the Rezoning Of APN 033-040-50 from R-1 Zone Designation to R-2 Zone Designation; and (iii) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-26, approving the Tentative Tract Map 6456 to create 38 single family lots with shared roof townhomes as shown in Exhibit B of the TTM resolution. The City’s Planning Commission recommended approval of the above at their May 6, 2025 public hearing.

Executive Summary
Terra Firma Development LLC (Terra Firma) has submitted a Tentative Tract Map for future development of a 38-unit subdivision of APN: 033-040-50 located at the southeast corner of Arizona Main Street. The parcel is located within the city limits and is designated by the General Plan as Low Density Residential and currently zoned R-1. Approval of the tentative tract map requires amending the General Plan land use designation from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and the zoning from R-1 to R-2 to allow for minimum lot size of 3,000 square feet. This would allow for development and approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide the existing parcel into 38 single family lots.

The applicant is proposing a subdivision to allow two-unit single story homes with each of the units on a separate lot but connected by a single roofline (See Exhibit B of the resolution) except for two lots with just a single unit on each. Each duplex would be separated from the adjacent 34 2
duplex by a minimum of 10 feet. The proposed development requires a text amendment to change the R-2 zone development standards. The text amendment proposes updates to the City’s Code to allow adjacent parcels to have a zero-lot line for certain duplexes on adjoining sides with a minimum 10-foot setback between structures on the opposite side yard, reduced front yard setbacks on lots facing streets with a typical 60-foot right of way, updates the definition of structure, provides additional options on street and driveway standards including street widths, curb design, and driveways\parking. This text amendment would allow for the construction of the proposed duplex units (see Exhibit C of the resolution). This project implements the goals and policies of the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element to facilitate housing development within the city.

General Plan Amendment
The proposed amendment is to change the designation of APN-033-040-50 from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential to allow for the change in zoning from R-1 to R-2. See Exhibit B in the attached GPA resolution.

Zoning Text and Map Amendment
Staff has prepared draft zoning text amendment language for City Council’s review and input (see Exhibit B of the zoning resolution). The draft is currently divided into several sections that include changes to the definition of a structure, R-2 setback standards, and street and driveway standards.

Changes are shown in strikeout and underline below and in Exhibit B of the zoning resolution.

The zoning on the property would also be changed to R-2 as shown in Exhibit C of the zoning resolution.

Change to definition of Driveway in Zoning Ordinance
Section § 71.08 Unlawful Parking, would be updated as follows:

DRIVEWAY. A poured-in-place asphalt or concrete slab which covers less than 50% of the required front yard area of the lot and is connected to a public right-of-way by a curb cut, or any other designated parking area. On corner lots, coverage can cover up to 60% of the required lot front yard area.

Change to definition of Structure in zone code
Section § 154.004 Definitions, would be updated as follows:

STRUCTURE. Anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires more or less permanent location on or in the ground or attachment to something having a permanent location on or in the ground, including but not limited to site-built swimming pools, gazebos, carports, patio covers. This definition does not include driveways and other ground level concrete or other ground level patios less than 12 inches in height, walls and fences less than three feet six inches in height when located in front yards, or less than six feet in height when located in side or rear yards, or other improvements of a minor character.

R-2 Zone Zero Lot Line Modification
Section § 154.062, Development Standards for R-2 zones would be modified as follows:
35 3
Development Standard Regulation Comments or Special Requirements Maximum Lot Coverage 60 percent
Minimum Lot Size Interior lots: 3,000 square feet
Corner lots: 3,500 square feet
Minimum Lot Dimensions Depth: 75 feet
Width: 40 feet
Exceptions may be made for cul-de-sac and
corner lots or other non-standard
circumstances.

Maximum Building
Height
Main building: 35 feet
Accessory building: 12 feet
Garage or carport: 15 feet
Minimum Yard Setbacks Front yard: 20 feet; 19 feet allowed on lots fronting a 60-foot right of way street
Side yard:
▪ Interior lot: 5 feet
▪ Corner lot, interior side: 5 feet
▪ Corner lot, street side: 10 feet
▪ Reverse corner lot: 15 feet
Rear Yard: 15 feet
Side yard, Zero Lot Line. Zero lot line
development shall be allowed with a tenfoot setback on the adjoining lot.

OR
Zero Lot Line on same lot line to allow
duplexes on adjoining sides with a
minimum 10-foot setback between
structures on the opposite side yard.

Minimum Space between
buildings
Between two buildings of residential use: 10
feet
Between any main building and all nonhabitable accessory buildings: 6 feet CEQA Determination
Per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an IS-MND has been prepared by the City of San Joaquin to assess the project to evaluate potentially significant environmental impacts. On the basis of that study it was determined that no significant environmental impacts would result from the project with mitigation incorporated. The City, as the CEQA Lead Agency, shall consider the MND as prepared prior to making a decision on the project. (See Exhibit A of each resolution).

Refinements were made during the review process to reduce the density and intensity of the project, and modify City standards. It has been determined the new project revisions do not create new avoidable significant effects, and do not create new significant environmental effects; and the refinements merely clarify or makes environmentally insignificant (and less impactful) modifications to the originally circulated mitigated negative declaration. As a result, recirculation of the initial study/MND is not required per CEQA Guidelines section 15073.5(c).) Background
The City previously approved Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 6307 in June of 2020 to allow for 23 single family lots. It was revised and approved in June of 2021 to add two additional lots for a total of 25 lots ranging in size from 6,300 square feet (SF) to 9,829 SF in accordance with R-1 zoning standards.

The applicant is proposing a revised map to allow for 38 lots as previously described. This map has been developed in coordination with City staff to meet City standards and modify standards to 36 4
allow for approval of this project in order to meet the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element programs to provide additional housing in the City.

The Applicant would be required to agree to the additional conditions of project approval listed below as part of obtaining tentative tract map approval. All other City and CEQA requirements for the proposed TTM are met to the City’s satisfaction. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) reviewed issued a fire permit (# 10868) for the TTM. The map submitted is shown in Exhibit A.

General Plan Consistency
The San Joaquin General Plan Land Use Element guides the city’s long-range growth and development policy; it establishes citywide standards, goals, and policies that are implemented through the City’s zoning ordinances, and other pertinent programs. The project site would be designated as Medium Density Residential (MDR) by the San Joaquin General Plan. The MDR limits building density to 8 to 20 units per acre with a minimum of 1,500 SF per unit. The planned land use for the TTM is to subdivide the existing lot into 38 single family lots on an approximately

5.06-acre parcel which would result in approximately 8 units per acre. The project is consistent with the San Joaquin General Plan requirements for the MDR designation.

Zoning Ordinance Consistency (SJMC Chapter 154)
The project site is zoned R-1 to be rezoned as R-2. Pursuant to SJMC Section 154.061 Permitted Uses, R zones permit the following by right: (A) residential structures together with the accessory buildings customary to such use; (B) Flower and vegetable gardens, orchards, the raising of tree crops, berry, or bush crops for the purpose of propagation and culture, including wholesaling crops raised on the premises; provided, no signs, displays, or stands are used in conjunction therewith; (C) Swimming pools for either individual, family, or communal use on an exclusive noncommercial basis. The TTM is consistent with the allowable uses of the project site pursuant to R2 zoning in that it allows for the development of 38 single family duplexes at an allowed density for the R-2 Zone District.

Staff is recommending the following project Conditions of Approval to the TTM to meet all required City standards. The Planning Commission has concurred with this recommendation. 37 5
Conditions of Approval:

Engineering Conditions of Approval
General

1. All minimum conditions of subdivision approval in the City of San Joaquin Subdivision Ordinance are included by reference.

2. The tract map shall comply with all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act.

3. Approval of the Tentative Map is subject to all required California Environmental Quality Act studies and corresponding mitigation measures as determined by the City Planner.

4. The subdivision layout, zoning, density, lot usage and access, and other applicable criteria are subject to the approval by the City Planner.

5. The subdivision ingress/egress is subject to the approval by the County of Fresno Fire Department. Applicant shall provide underground fire as required and approved by the Fire Department under Permit #10868.

6. The non-standard subdivision improvements including, but not limited to, right of way, driveway approach, L-type curb return, return radius, etc., are subject to the Text Amendment provisions approved by the San Joaquin Planning Commission and City Council.

7. Prior to approval of the Final Map and recording thereof, Applicant shall:
a. Construct all public improvements or provide the required surety for the construction thereof for acceptance by the City Council.
b. All necessary dedications for rights of way and easements shall be provided to the City of San Joaquin, public utility companies, and other affected agencies. c. Properly abandon any existing public or private easements within the proposed subdivision.

8. Prior to approval of the Final Map, improvement plans for streets, utilities, drainage facilities, survey monuments, grading, erosion control, and other required improvements shall be submitted for the City Engineer’s approval.

9. Public improvements shall conform to the City of San Joaquin Improvement Standards in place at the time of tentative map approval except as permitted by any zoning and land use approvals for this project and any modifications thereto approved by the City Engineer. The work shall comply with all applicable State, Federal, and local laws and regulations.

10. A soils report prepared by a California registered geotechnical engineer shall be submitted to the City Engineer as part of the improvement plans. The soils report shall include 38 6
recommendations for the structural sections for streets, excavation, compaction, clearing, and grubbing requirements.

11. Prior to approval of the improvement plans, Applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for construction activities pursuant to the California Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2022-0057-DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002. Prepare an Erosion Control Plan as part of the improvement plans for storm water and construction BMPs. Applicant shall provide a WDID number prior to approval of the improvement plans.

12. Prior to approval of the improvement plans, Applicant shall prepare a pre-project water balance calculation for storm water runoff pursuant to the California Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2022-0057-DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002 for compliance with Post-Construction Standards for non-MS4 Phase I and Phase II agencies.

13. Prior to approval of the improvement plans, Applicant shall prepare a Dust Control Plan (DCP) and file the Plan with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District for approval of construction activities for the project if required.

14. Prior to the issuance of any grading and encroachment permits, Applicant shall pay the permit fee, plan check and inspection fees, and furnish improvement securities pursuant to the City’s improvement standards, municipal code, ordinances, and California Subdivision Map Act.

15. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall pay all development impact fees as specified and pursuant to the City’s municipal code, ordinances, and resolutions. The fee assessment shall include all applicable fees for Public Facilities, Police, Fire Protection, Streets, Water, Sewer, Storm Drainage, Railroad Crossings and Parks. Fees shall be paid at the time of the issuance of each permit.

16. The proposed parcels shall be annexed to the applicable assessment districts including, but not limited to, the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District and Community Facilities District for the City of San Joaquin for all required and applicable assessments, or, at the City’s discretion, Applicant will agree to form a new district for these assessments.

17. Provide utility services to each lot including electric power, gas, telephone, and cable television, unless approved otherwise by the City of San Joaquin. Construct all proposed utilities underground within the street rights of way or public utility easement.

18. Provide Center Line Monuments for all street intersections and locations as required by the City standards.

19. Remove all utility poles along the street frontage of proposed subdivision and underground all overhead lines including electrical, communication, and cable tv.

20. Provide a landscaped buffer between the street side and subdivision lots along Main Street. 39 7

21. Construct a split-face CMU block wall on Main Street to extend the length of the subdivision boundary.

22. Applicant shall comply with all flood hazard requirements for all newly created lots pursuant to all applicable regulations and as approved by the City of San Joaquin.

23. The location and installation of mailboxes shall be approved by the US Postmaster and the City of San Joaquin.

24. The names for the new subdivision streets are subject to approval by the City of San Joaquin.

25. The existing and proposed right of ways and easements shown on the Tentative Map shall be preliminary until the Final Map is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.

26. Applicant shall coordinate and obtain all required approvals from any stakeholder agencies affected by the work.

Subdivision Public Improvements
Streets

27. Dedicate a 10-ft public utility/pedestrian easement for the south half of Main Street and construct street improvements pursuant to standards for a 100-ft Typical Street Section or as approved by the City Engineer. Roadway pavement shall be widened to ultimate street width within the project frontage and transitioned to existing pavement as required. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscaping, street lighting and other required street frontage improvements shall extend the length of the subdivision boundary. Construct all required frontage improvements per City standards and the Tentative Map or as approved by the City Engineer.

28. Dedicate a 10-ft public utility/pedestrian easement for the east half of Arizona Avenue and construct street improvements pursuant to standards for a 60-ft Typical Street Section or as approved by the City Engineer. Roadway pavement shall be widened to ultimate street width within the project frontage and transitioned to existing pavement as required. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk and other required street frontage improvements shall extend the length of the subdivision boundary. Construct all required frontage improvements per City standards and the Tentative Map or as approved by the City Engineer.

29. Dedicate street right of way and public utility/pedestrian easement for all new subdivision streets and construct street improvements pursuant to a 53-ft Proposed Street Section as shown on the Tentative Map or as approved by the City Engineer. Roadway improvements shall include, but not be limited to, pavement section, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, driveways, street lighting, landscaping, survey monuments, signage, and striping and shall conform to the City’s Improvement Standards and the Tentative Map.

30. Dedicate street right of way and public utility/pedestrian easement for all new subdivision streets and construct street improvements pursuant to a 49-ft Proposed Street Section as shown on the Tentative Map or as approved by the City Engineer. Roadway improvements shall include, but not be limited to, pavement section, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, 40 8
driveways, street lighting, landscaping, survey monuments, signage, and striping and shall conform to the City’s Improvement Standard and the Tentative Map.

31. Provide street lights on Arizona Avenue as required by the City of San Joaquin.

32. Provide asphalt overlay for Arizona Avenue as shown on the Tentative Map and as approved by the City Engineer.

33. Provide fire lane red painted curbs as shown on the Tentative Map and as approved by the City of San Joaquin.

Water System

34. Construct water mains, fire hydrants, blowoffs, sampling stations, and lateral connections as necessary to serve each lot.

35. Water services shall be sized to meet domestic and fire protection demands and shall include shutoff valves, corporation stops, and water meters. Subdivider shall incorporate water recirculation for residential sprinkler system at the water service or onsite plumbing as applicable.

36. Construct minimum 8-inch water mains on City streets and looped as needed to support the proposed subdivision and approved by the City Engineer. Pipe sizes greater than the minimum shall be determined from hydraulic calculations and/or modeling studies, consistent with the existing network grid, or as recommended from the Water Master Plan.

37. Construct and/or extend water mains on Main Street, Veracruz Avenue, Chiapas Avenue, and 11th Street.

38. Extend the existing 12-inch water main on Main Street the length of the subdivision boundary.

39. Provide fire hydrants on Main Street and Arizona Avenue as required by the County of Fresno Fire Department.

Sewer System

40. Construct sewer lines, lift stations, manholes, and lateral connections as necessary to serve each lot. Convey sanitary wastewater via a gravity flow system unless a lift station is required at points of connection due to topography restrictions.

41. Lateral connections shall include cleanouts and other required components per the City’s Improvement Standards.

42. Construct minimum 8-inch sewer mains on City streets unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. Pipe sizes greater than the minimum shall be determined from hydraulic calculations and/or modeling studies, consistent with the existing network grid, or as recommended from the Sewer Master Plan.

43. Construct and/or extend sewer mains on Main Street, Veracruz Avenue, and Chiapas Avenue.

44. Extend the existing 8-inch sewer main on Main Street the length of the subdivision boundary. 41 9
Storm Drainage

45. Construct storm drain lines, manholes, drain inlets, catch basins, detention basins, outfalls, and lift stations as necessary for collecting and conveying the storm runoff for the subdivision.

46. Construct storm sewers on City streets as determined from hydraulic calculations and/or modeling studies, consistent with the existing network grid, or as recommended from the Storm Drain Master Plan.

47. All runoff from the proposed City streets shall be contained within the public rights of way or easements and conveyed to a storm drain basin agreeable to the City and Applicant.

Applicant shall discharge storm runoff to the City basin on northeast corner of California and 5 th Street via the existing City storm sewers. Applicant shall upgrade the pipe network or demonstrate that these facilities have the adequate capacity to handle the existing flows plus project. Applicant shall be responsible for any required off-site storm basin improvements to accommodate the additional storm water runoff from the project site. 42 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SAN JOAQUIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 6456
WHEREAS, On December 19, 2023, Terra Firma Development LLC (“Applicant”) submitted a Tentative Tract Map (TTM) to split a parcel into 38 single-family lots on APN 033-040-50 (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 2025-03 recommending approval of the TTM to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council received the recommendation of the Planning Commission and considered the staff report with project conditions of approval and all the information, evidence, and testimony presented in connection with this Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the Main Street Townhomes IS-MND prior to making a decision on TTM No. 6456 (attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference).

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Joaquin finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

1. The City Council finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council has considered the IS-MND prepared for this project prior to making a decision on Tentative Tract Map 6456 (attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference) and the recommendation for approval from the Planning Commission.

3. The City Council hereby approves TTM No. 6456 subject to conditions in the Staff Report, all of which are included in Exhibits B and C and incorporated herein by this reference.

4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of the Resolution.

5. This resolution is effective upon final adoption of the related Ordinance No. 2025-01 (Zoning Text Amendment and Rezoning Map).

The forgoing resolution was adopted at a regular council meeting of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin the 3rd day of June 2025, and passed at said meeting with the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
43 ___________________________
Adam Flores-Cornejo, Mayor
City of San Joaquin
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Matt Flood, City Clerk
City of San Joaquin
Approved as to Legal Form:

Hilda Cantú Montoy
City Attorney
Exhibit A: Main Street Townhomes IS-MND
Exhibit B: Tentative Tract Map No. 6456
Exhibit C: Conditions of Approval
44 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Main Street Townhomes Project
Prepared for:

City of San Joaquin
21900 Colorado Avenue
San Joaquin, CA 93660
(559) 693-4311
Contact: Matt Flood
Prepared by:

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
113 N. Church Street, Suite 310
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 840-4414
Contact: Emily Bowen, LEED AP
October 2024
45 Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT INFORMATION................................................................................................. 4 Project title ......................................................................................................................... 4 Lead agency name and address ..................................................................................... 4 Contact person and phone number............................................................................... 4 Project location ................................................................................................................. 4 Project sponsor’s name/address..................................................................................... 5 General plan designation................................................................................................ 5 Zoning ............................................................................................................................... 5 Project Description........................................................................................................... 5 Surrounding Land Uses/Existing Conditions .............................................................. 6 Other Public Agencies Involved .................................................................................... 6 Tribal Consultation .......................................................................................................... 7 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ...................................11 DETERMINATION .............................................................................................................12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST...................................................................................13 I. AESTHETICS...............................................................................................................13 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES......................................................16 III. AIR QUALITY ........................................................................................................18 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES...................................................................................25 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES ......................................................................................31 VI. ENERGY...................................................................................................................34 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.........................................................................................37 46 Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS......................................................................43 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ..................................................47 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .............................................................53 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING .............................................................................59 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES........................................................................................61 XIII. NOISE .....................................................................................................................63 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING........................................................................67 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES................................................................................................. 69 XVI. RECREATION .......................................................................................................72 XVII. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC.........................................................................74 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................. 78 XX. WILDFIRE................................................................................................................85 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ............................................88 LIST OF PREPARERS.........................................................................................................91 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM.............................92 47 Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 4

PROJECT INFORMATION
This document is the Initial Study for the potential environmental effects of the Main Street Townhomes Project (Project) proposed in the City of San Joaquin (City). To accommodate this Project, the City would need to approve a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and a Text Amendment to the City of San Joaquin Zoning Ordinance. The City of San Joaquin would act as the Lead Agency for this project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines. Copies of all materials referenced in this report are available for review in the project file during regular business hours at the San Joaquin City Hall at 21900 Colorado Avenue, San Joaquin, CA 93662.

Project title
Main Street Townhomes Project
Lead agency name and address
City of San Joaquin
21900 Colorado Avenue
San Joaquin, CA 93660
(559) 693-4311
Contact person and phone number
Elizabeth Cabrera, City Manager
City of San Joaquin
(559) 693-4311
Email: [email protected]
Project location
The City of San Joaquin lies in the Central San Joaquin Valley region, in the central portion of Fresno County (see Figure 1). The City is approximately 8.5 miles south of State Route (SR) 180 and 5.5 miles northwest of SR 145. The proposed Project site is located in northeastern San Joaquin, inside the City limits, east of the corner of Main Street and Arizona Avenue (see Figure 2). The proposed development is located on an approximately 5.06-acre site on Assessor’s Parcel Number 033-040-50 (see Figure 3). 48 Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 5 Project sponsor’s name/address
Terra Firma Development, LLC
2037 W. Bullard Avenue Unit 342
Fresno, CA 93711
General plan designation
Existing: LDR (Low Density Residential)
Proposed: MDR (Medium Density Residential)
Zoning
Existing: R-1
Proposed: R-2
Project Description
The Project Applicant intends to develop a 44-unit single family development, ranging in size from 3,500 square feet to 5,700 square feet of duplex homes on a 5.06-acre site (see Figure 3 for Site Plan).

Project Components
• Development of a 44-unit single family duplexes.
• Construction of internal roads, landscaping, and a six-foot block wall along Main Street per City Standards.
• Construction of curb, gutter and sidewalks, per City Standards. • Connection to City utilities, including stormwater, sewer and water. • Approval of Zone change from R-1 to R-2.
• Approval of a General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential.
• Approval of a Text Amendment to the City of San Joaquin Zoning Ordinance. Part 6, R-2 MultiFamily Residential Zoning; Section 154.006.03 Development Standards currently require a minimum side yard of 10 feet to the adjoining Lot when a “0” lot line development is proposed.

As part of the Project, the text would be amended to state when a zero “0” lot line development with a duplex building, defined under Section 154.003.01 Definitions of the City of San Joaquin Zoning Ordinance, the interior zero lot line shall divide a 1” air space equally between two fire 49 Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 6 rated walls dividing the duplex into two single family residential units, the opposite side yard shall provide for a minimum setback of 5 feet, resulting in a minimum 10 feet between buildings on the adjoining lot as intended by the current development standards.

Site Circulation
Access to and from the Project site would be from three points along Main Street, at Sanders and Christpher Streets that would be connected by 11th Street, and from Arizona Avenue.

Surrounding Land Uses/Existing Conditions
The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The Project site is sparsely vegetated, with nonnative annual grasses and forbs present on the western margin and trees present in the northeast, east and southeast portions of the site.

Lands surrounding the proposed Project are described as follows:
• North: Agricultural fields, single-family residences, Main Street. • South: Single-family residences, Arizona Avenue, walnut orchards. • East: Walnut orchards.
• West: Single-family residences.

Other Public Agencies Involved
• Approval of a Zone Change by the City of San Joaquin
• Approval of a General Plan Amendment by the City of San Joaquin • Approval of a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment by the City of San Joaquin • Approval of Building Permits by the City of San Joaquin • Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration by the City of San Joaquin • San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
• Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
• Compliance with other federal, state and local requirements 50 Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 7 Tribal Consultation
The City of San Joaquin has not received any Project-specific requests from any Tribes in the geographic area with which it is traditionally and culturally affiliated with or otherwise to be notified about projects in the City of San Joaquin.
51 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 8 Figure 1 – Location
52 Mendot
~-
a CRJl
180
W Cnlffomfa Aw
W Jel,.,.on """
33 *
WkammAwe
0 2.5 5 Miles W Mount Whitney A'Je
Imagery provided by fsri and its licensors © 2020.
* Project Location
N
A
Livermore ~
~ ~
~
'5W
San Jose
'"
~
Salinas
Soledad
Kerman
W Mannin& Ave
Modesto
"
Los Banos
Merced
*
Coalinga
Avenal
~Shi..khA"'
W Kearney Blvd
WJenmnAYP
WM' Wh n yAve
VosermteNational
Park
Fresno
S11!:tra
Nauon.al
Forest
Lemoore Vis.ilia
Delano
58 5,quola
National
Park
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 9 Figure 2 – Site Aerial
53 Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 10 Figure 3 – Site Plan
54 /-. ~'\j ) :;.~- ~' :";;"1-· •::>:-,
LJ )~~•\, •• ,CC CC•C r . ~ . :;- C.C. ,r _ ,,. - / - .. ,." "'~ ,.,, .- . . .. · ~ ........ . -
,. . :~ -n, . ·-t-·--, - i=;; - - • " " -,
(I.J ~ .... - .. ~ -;
'
~
.·
,
r
;: =:
'1 )
- ,, , .
1:
.:
__ _
' (
'. 'j ; ~
~i
-
J._;;_. __,,
I
1--n
!1
h1 ::··~:- h•: r-k'.; ,. -,.
-- ,,,- s,· - • - •r____:1,' - 7
~•-- 1 ;:;;;;-;;HJ;;v!e::'=,
--------------
PROPOSED 53' STREET SECTION
}.
_; 3;-"~;:..j 1111
,i_-,,i:.:
/ ;~ :,;:<::/::~':!..- /~:<-.:..•+ __,,.. .. / · .... , ~"r~ "'~---~<-· .. ,,_,,•>"" _,,.>< ••' " - _,,~':::,:N',
_,, -::;.~ _./x"-/:!$1_ s
~,-"-_ --. .,_ -~~, ,,,.-~>(- j.>;:> / ~'""', ,;;::"" ,, ..... ,_.f' •l ""« _; ~_,,; (<3,~1/ -~·----': .·.i><< l· .• ,, ,...,. .....,,c ~-, ... , .•• ,,
,rn~lll§D'rlfi;'fj 1@; liif'G:(.;l'fi't':;J~nt (:JJ,;i~; ~'i' IP)irn~~ t':IJ>f;;;fj;l@t;:}!;}{I ~/
/'"\
L... db:;°
·,.

SITE
-+rl
; \ (
'-"---'-----"--'-) I
l OCA TION MAP
l,"J."f(,!c'1£l

NOTES LEGAL DESCRIPTION

RECORD OWNER

FLOOD ZONE NOTE
LEGEND
-h-£nS'. .. '(,lfl.i,"~~ t. C:·;t·
- •' - {'/ P<'.~ Pa,·,_,_,- ;r, Vl,'>IY.'/f,1//'/;
!1'; ~·/J','{~7'?-~a7.,"r:,':','!::lll"'
_,.•• f:,('.J:.7',";S.~::.<'A,•: .41,W<(U
....
-~---
... ~/;f'"'1:m i.::r:-;
.=
.
., -
.,.
... .'!',(. ... JX:.' J•.v.•,n,:,,:~~ f.it.._'""-'" l'>"'(,PJ;R ... ,~!"/.Rt .TKP N,V;/G/r .-{"--;•::;a; !l.:-,.=4i ~1.-.n

KEYNOTES
0 •~"t:':"t:."'"'(;W"-'"""'
© .-:..~r~t.is;;:,·,.~_.-C'/ crrra· !I.•·
@
: ~~-~:.~r;:".;".;·i';';~,:;•,w
~;ih ;•
i: 1· ia• ~- ~J~I
®i
{f/~;;1
-~~:-a
ij ij
I
L:' ; I~ i
U'
; 1~1 111
11 rn "'h
....
--
13 it c.;
I
.... i:::
t:l i'.!
II)"
:'..'I i:!: lil!
,,.
i~
°' ! h
I! ,~ "
::silt_ SHITT 1 or 1
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 11

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture Resources
and Forest Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology / Water
Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population / Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation
Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities / Service
Systems
Wildfire Mandatory Findings of
Significance
55 □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 12

DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Elizabeth Cabrera
City Manager
City of San Joaquin
Date
10/10/2024
10/10/24
56 □
□
□
□
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 13

ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
I. AESTHETICS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within
a state scenic highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that
are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage point). If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and regulations
governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The Project site currently supports a vacant agricultural field. The Project site is otherwise sparsely vegetated, mainly with nonnative annual grasses and forbs and some trees. Surrounding the proposed Project are Main Street, agricultural fields, and single-family residences to the north; Arizona Avenue, walnut orchards and single-family residences to the south; walnut orchards to the east; and single-family residences to the west.
57 □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 14

RESPONSES
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Applicant intends to develop a 44-unit single-family residential duplex development on an approximately 5.06-acre site in northeastern San Joaquin.

A scenic vista is defined as a viewpoint that provides expansive views of highly valued landscape for the benefit of the general public. The site consists of a vacant agricultural field. The City of San Joaquin and Fresno County do not identify any scenic vistas or other scenic resources within the Project area’s vicinity. There are no officially designated or eligible State Scenic Highways near the Project area. The Project has a less than significant impact on scenic vistas or designated scenic resources or highways.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and regulations governing scenic quality?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would alter the existing visual character of public views of the site from vacant land to fully developed single-family residences. The Project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Text Amendment to the City of San Joaquin Zoning Ordinance Section 154.006.03, which pertains to side yards and lot line development spacing for duplexes. The Project design would then be subject to the City’s remaining Zoning Ordinances, which contain standards that apply to site layout, building design, landscaping, interior street design, lighting, parking and signage. Per the City’s Design Guidelines, detailed architectural plans, color palettes and building materials as well as landscaping plans would be submitted by the Project developer to the City of San Joaquin. The plans shall be required prior to issuance of any building permits. The review shall be substantially based on the building plans and elevations illustrated within this document.

The improvements such as those proposed by the Project are typical of City urban areas and are generally expected from residents of the City. These improvements would not substantially degrade the visual character of the area and would not diminish the visual quality of the area, as they would be consistent with the existing urban visual setting. The proposed Project itself is not visually imposing against the scale of the existing adjacent residential buildings and nature of the surrounding area.

Therefore, the Project would have less than significant impacts on the visual character of the area. 58 Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 15 Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less Than Significant Impact. Nighttime lighting is necessary to provide and maintain safe, secure, and attractive environments; however, these lights have the potential to produce spillover light and glare and waste energy, and if designed incorrectly, could be considered unattractive. Light that falls beyond the intended area is referred to as “light trespass”. Types of light trespass include spillover light and glare.

Minimizing all these forms of obtrusive light is an important environmental consideration. A less obtrusive and well-designed energy efficient fixture would face downward, emit the correct intensity of light for the use, and incorporate energy timers.

Spillover light is light emitted by a lighting installation that falls outside the boundaries of the property on which the installation is sited. Spillover light can adversely affect light-sensitive uses, such as residential neighborhoods at nighttime. Because light dissipates as it travels from the source, the intensity of a light fixture is often increased at the source to compensate for the dissipated light. This can further increase the amount of light that illuminates adjacent uses. Spillover light can be minimized by using only the level of light necessary, and by using cutoff type fixtures or shielded light fixtures, or a combination of fixture types.

Glare results when a light source directly in the field of vision is brighter than the eye can comfortably accept. Squinting or turning away from a light source is an indication of glare. The presence of a bright light in an otherwise dark setting may be distracting or annoying, referred to as discomfort glare, or it may diminish the ability to see other objects in the darkened environment, referred to as disability glare.

Glare can be reduced by design features that block direct line of sight to the light source and that direct light downward, with little or no light emitted at high (near horizontal) angles, since this light would travel long distances. Cutoff-type light fixtures minimize glare because they emit relatively low-intensity light at these angles.

Current sources of light in the Project area are from adjacent residential uses located to the northwest, west and south., which include streetlights and vehicle lights from vehicles traveling along Main Street and Arizona Avenue. The Project would necessitate street lighting and such lighting that would be subject to City standards, which would ensure that unnecessary light and glare would be minimized.

Accordingly, potential impacts would be considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
59 Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 16 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST

RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland Production
(as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
60 □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 17

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is located in northeastern San Joaquin, inside the City’s limits, in Fresno County within the San Joaquin Valley, California. The proposed site is designated as Prime Farmland by the State Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP).1 No land under Williamson Act contract occurs in the proposed Project area.

RESPONSES
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The site is located within the City’s limits and is currently designated and zoned for residential uses. Upon approval, the site would be designated for medium-density residential uses, instead of low-density. Any potential impacts resulting from the conversion of agricultural land were previously analyzed in the City of San Joaquin General Plan EIR (SCH#2013091069) at the time the site was designated for residential uses. The Project site is on the valley floor and as such, does not contain forest or timberland and there are no other changes in the existing environment that could result in farmland conversion. As such, there are no new impacts resulting from the conversion of agricultural land.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
1 California Important Farmland Finder, Department of Conservation. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. Accessed August 2024. 61 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 18
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
III. AIR QUALITY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d. Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors or adversely affecting a
substantial number of people)?

RESPONSES
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project site is located in the northeastern portion of the City, east of the corner of Main Street and Arizona Avenue. The Project includes construction of a 44-unit duplex development on a 5.06-acre site. The development would include internal access roads, lighting and other associated improvements.

The proposed Project is in a region classified as a nonattainment area. The main purpose of the air quality plan is to bring the area into compliance with the requirements of the federal and State air quality standards. To bring the San Joaquin Valley into attainment, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) adopted the 2022 Plan for the 2015 8-Hour Ozone Standard in December 2022 to satisfy Clean Air Act requirements and ensure attainment of the 75 parts per billion (ppb) 8-hour ozone standard.
62 □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 19
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
To ensure the San Joaquin Valley’s Air Basin’s (Basin) continued attainment of the USEPA PM10 standard, the SJVAPCD adopted the 2007 PM10 Maintenance Plan in September 2007. The SJVAPCD adopted the 2018 Plan for the 1997, 2006, and 2012 PM2.5 Standards in November 2018 to address the USEPA 1997 annual PM2.5 standard of 15 µg/m3 and 24-hour PM2.5 standard of 65 µg/m3, the 2006 24- hour PM2.5 standard of 35 μg/m³, and the 2012 annual PM2.5 standard of 12 μg/m³.

Construction Emissions
Construction emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2022.1.1.28 and default values were utilized where information was not known. As shown in Table 1, the emissions in each construction year are below the significance thresholds (modeling assumptions are provided in Appendix A). Consequently, the emissions on a Project basis are less than significant.

Table 1: Construction Air Pollutant Emissions
Year Emissions (tons per year)
ROG NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
2024 0.05 0.46 0.44 0.10 0.06
2025 0.41 1.24 1.60 0.06 0.05
Significance threshold
(tons/year
10 10 100 15 15
Exceed threshold—
significant impact?
No No No No No
Notes:

PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are from the mitigated output to reflect compliance with Regulation VIII – Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions. ROG = reactive organic gases NOx = nitrogen oxides PM10 and PM2.5 = particulate matter Source: Appendix A Modeling Results.

Operational Emissions
Operational emissions occur during the project's lifespan and come from two major sources: Region sources and motor vehicles or mobile sources. Construction is expected to progress over two years, to be 63 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 20
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
completed in 2025. When making important determinations, the SJVAPCD considers building and operating emissions separately; in any case, the annual operating emissions together with the annual building emissions would not exceed the relevant SJVAPCD thresholds.

Reductions from land use and transportation measures relating to the location, site design, and proximity of the project to alternative modes of transport are measured by CalEEMod and are based on the methodology provided in the 2010 report of the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), Quantifying Gas Mitigation Measures. As shown in Table 2, the emissions are below the SJVAPCD significance thresholds, and therefore, would result in a less than significant impact.

Table 2: Operational Air Pollutant Emissions
Source Emissions (tons per year)
ROG NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Area 0.43 0.02 0.64 0.06 0.006
Energy <0.005 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.01
Mobile 0.27 0.26 1.77 0.36 0.09
Total 0.70 0.36 2.44 0.42 0.16
Significance
threshold
10 10 100 15 15
Exceed
threshold—
significant
impact?
No No No No No
Notes: ROG = reactive organic gases NOx = nitrogen oxides PM10 and PM2.5 = particulate matter
Area source emissions include emissions from natural gas, landscape, and painting.

Source: Appendix A.
64 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 21
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Localized Pollutant Analysis
Emissions that occur at or near the project have the ability to create a localized effect that is often called an air pollutant hotspot. Localized emissions are deemed important if they would surpass any healthbased air quality level when combined with background emissions.

The SJVAPCD prepared the Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI) which provides screening criteria to identify projects needing thorough review for localized impacts. Projects with rises in on-site emissions from building or operating activities above the screening standard of 100 pounds per day of any polluting parameters following compliance with Rule 9510 and the implementation of all enforceable mitigation measures would require an environmental quality review.

An estimate of the average daily emissions during construction and service was performed to assess if emissions for any pollutant of concern would exceed 100 pounds per day. The average daily emissions would occur during construction during 2024 and 2025. During the Project buildout, which is expected to be completed in 2025, the estimated daily operating emissions would be present. Operational emissions include pollution from on-site sources such as natural gas production and landscape maintenance, and from off-site vehicles that enter the project. Pollution from motor vehicles would occur away from the site and would not lead to a breach of local air quality regulations, rendering the study highly conservative. The results of the screening analysis are presented in Table 3.

Table 3: Maximum Daily Air Pollutant Emissions
Source Emissions (pounds per day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Construction
2024

36.0 33.5 21.4 11.6
Construction
2025

10.6 13.7 0.53 0.42
Operations 2.51 24.1 3.5 1.96
Screening
threshold
100 100 100 100
Exceed
screening
threshold?
No No No No
Notes:
65 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 22
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Source Emissions (pounds per day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
NOx = nitrogen oxides CO = carbon monoxide PM10 and PM2.5 = particulate matter
The proposed Project would not surpass SJVAPCD screening requirements to require additional analysis of the ambient air quality; therefore, the project’s localized criteria pollutant impacts are less than significant.

Furthermore, the growth projections used for the San Joaquin General Plan assume that growth in population, vehicle use and other source categories would occur at rates that are consistent with the rates used to develop the SJVAPCD’s attainment plans. In other words, the amount of growth predicted for the General Plan is accommodated by the SJVAPCD’s attainment plan and would allow the air basin to attain the 8-hour ozone standard by the 2023 attainment date. Development of 44 single-family duplex residences on the subject property would be required to comply with these rules and regulations providing additional support for the conclusion that it would not interfere or obstruct with the application of the attainment plans.

The proposed Project would comply with the Conservation Element of the San Joaquin General Plan and the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the Regional Transportation Plan adopted by the Fresno Council of Fresno County Governments; therefore, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct an applicable air quality plan.

Because the Project site has been planned for residential (R-1) development since the General Plan EIR was adopted, and because the Project would have less than significant project-level impacts related to criteria air pollutants, the cumulative increase of any criteria pollutant would also be less than significant.

As noted above, the Project would not otherwise conflict with the SJVAPCD’s air quality plans. The Project is consistent with the land use assumptions for the Project site in the City’s General Plan and EIR, and the cumulative emissions would not be a significant contribution to a cumulative impact. The impact would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? 66 I I I
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 23
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Less Than Significant Impact. The Air Basin is in non-attainment for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5, which means that certain pollutants' exposure levels are often higher than the normal air quality requirements.

Air quality standards have been set to protect public health, particularly the health of vulnerable people.

Therefore, if the concentration of those contaminants exceeds the norm, some susceptible individuals in the population are likely to experience health effects. The health effects are therefore a factor in the doseresponse curve. Concentration of the pollutant in the air, the length of time exposed and the individual's reaction are factors that affect the extent and nature of the health effects. As shown in Table 1 and Table 2, the regional construction and operational emission analysis shows that the Project does not surpass the substantial thresholds of the SJVAPCD and that the Project is compliant with the Air Quality Attainment Plan applicable. Therefore, the Project would not result in significant cumulative health impacts. Impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. Sensitive receptors include the following uses: residences, schools, daycare centers, extended-care facilities, and hospitals. There are sensitive receptors (residential uses) near the site to the northwest, west and south. Although the proposed Project itself is a sensitive receptor and is being proposed near busy roadways, which have the potential to expose the proposed sensitive receptors to a higher level of pollution concentrations, for the purposes of CEQA, we only consider the impact of the project on the environment and not the impact of the environment on the project.

Impacts to On-site Workers
The Project is not a commercial or manufacturing venture which would have employees on-site.

Therefore, a health risk assessment is not needed or recommended for the construction workers.

Construction: NOx, PM10, PM2.5
As stated in Impact III-b), emissions during construction would not reach the thresholds of significance and would not be anticipated to result in concentrations that reach ambient standards or significantly add to a current excess of an ambient air quality level.

Operation: PM10, PM2.5, CO, NO2
As stated in Impact III-a), localized PM10, PM2.5, CO and NO2 concentrations would not surpass the ambient air quality requirements. A 44-home subdivision is an insignificant source of these pollutants. 67 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 24
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
The Project should therefore not expose susceptible receptors to significant air pollutant concentrations during service. Impacts to sensitive receptors would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measure: None are required.
d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Less Than Significant Impact. The SJVAPCD addresses odor criteria within the GAMAQI and has not established a rule or standard regarding odor emissions, rather, the district has a nuisance rule: “Any project with the potential to frequently expose members of the public to objectionable odors should be deemed to have a significant impact.” During project construction, some odors may be present due to diesel exhaust. However, these odors would be temporary and limited to the construction period. The proposed residential uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Any odors in general would be confined mainly to the Project site and would readily dissipate. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. The impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
68 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 25
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement
of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
69 □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 26
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
or impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is located in a portion of the central San Joaquin Valley that has, for decades, experienced intensive agricultural and urban disturbances. Current agricultural endeavors in the region include dairy, cattle, groves, and row crops.

Like most of California, the Central San Joaquin Valley experiences a Mediterranean climate. Warm dry summers are followed by cool moist winters. Summer temperatures usually exceed 90 degrees Fahrenheit, and the relative humidity is generally very low. Winter temperatures rarely raise much above 70 degrees Fahrenheit, with daytime highs often below 60 degrees Fahrenheit. Annual precipitation within the proposed Project area is about 10 inches, almost 85% of which falls between the months of October and March. Nearly all precipitation falls in the form of rain and storm-water readily infiltrates the soils of the surrounding the site.

Native plant and animal species once abundant in the region have become locally extirpated or have experienced large reductions in their populations due to conversion of upland, riparian, and aquatic habitats to agricultural and urban uses. Remaining native habitats are particularly valuable to native wildlife species including special status species that still persist in the region.

The site is currently vacant. The Project site’s surrounding lands consist primarily of single-family residences and agricultural uses.

The impact analyses in this section are based on a Biological Resources Technical Memorandum for the Tentative Tract Map 6307, San Joaquin, California, prepared for the Project by Rincon Consultants, Inc. on April 13, 2020, which is included in Appendix B.
70 □ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 27
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study

RESPONSES
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant Impact. A record search of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB, 9-quad search) was performed for the Project.

The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) were also accessed to obtain comprehensive information regarding state and federally listed species, as well as other special status species and sensitive plant communities considered to have potential to occur or known to occur within the San Joaquin, California USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle and/or surrounding eight quadrangles.

The review of the resource agency databases for known special status animal occurrences within the nine USGS quadrangles containing and surrounding the project site identified 25 special status animal species and 16 special status plant species known to occur in the region. The site was evaluated for its potential to provide habitat value for these species. Of the species known to occur in the region, two animal species are known to forage in habitat types with characteristics similar to the Project site: northern harrier (Circus hudsonius; state species of special concern) and Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni; state threatened species).

The Project site does not currently provide suitable habitat for any of the special status plant species to occur on the site due to high levels of disturbance, long-time development of areas surrounding the site, and the absence of native vegetation communities on the Project site. No rodent burrows were observed on the Project site, indicating a low prey base and poor-quality foraging habitat for predatory bird species. There is no suitable nesting habitat for Swainson’s hawk on the project site or in the immediate vicinity, and no known nests within 10 miles. No raptor nests were observed on utility poles or in palm trees near the site. Therefore, there is no potential for special status species to exist in the area. Any impacts to special status species are considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
71 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 28
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is comprised almost exclusively of agricultural land. No jurisdictional waters or wetlands are present within or surrounding the Project site. A small area of nonnative annual grasses and forbs dominated by mustard (Brassica nigra) and ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus) is present on the western margin of the site. Walnut trees had recently been planted to the northeast, east and southeast of the site. The trees are present in the northeast, east, and southeast portions of the site. Land use surrounding the project site is suburban/residential to the south and west and agricultural to the north, east and southeast. A fallow field and single-family residence are located across Main Street to the north and northwest and multifamily residences are located across Arizona Avenue to the southwest. Common landscaping vegetation is present in the residentially developed areas surrounding the site, and includes ornamental trees, shrubs, and grasses.

The proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS as no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community is present in the survey area. The proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means as no impacts to wetlands would occur. As such, there would be less than significant impacts.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. There are no natural waterways or natural vegetation on the Project site, and the site is not used for movement of wildlife species or for a migratory wildlife corridor, nor is the site used for native wildlife nursery sites. The parcel is currently vacant land with minimal vegetation. The site is highly disturbed; however, in the event that migratory and/or native avian species are nesting within or adjacent to the proposed Project area at the time of construction, construction activities could result in nest abandonment and/or direct mortality to individual birds.

Project activities that injure or kill native birds or lead to nest abandonment would violate the California 72 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 29
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Fish and Game Code. The implementation of BIO-1 would ensure that potential impacts remain less than significant.

Mitigation Measures:

BIO-1. To the extent practicable, construction shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season, which extends from February through August. If it is not possible to schedule construction between September and January, preconstruction surveys for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that no active nests would be disturbed during the implementation of the Project. A pre-construction survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of construction activities. During this survey, the qualified biologist shall inspect all potential nest substrates in and immediately adjacent to the impact areas.

If an active nest is found close enough to the construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the qualified biologist shall determine the extent of a construction-free buffer to be established around the nest. If work cannot proceed without disturbing the nesting birds, work may need to be halted or redirected to other areas until nesting and fledging are completed or the nest has otherwise failed for non-construction related reasons.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact. The proposed Project is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of San Joaquin General Plan and would not conflict with the General Plan’s policies related to “no-net-loss” of wetlands and preservation of riparian habitats because wetlands and riparian habitats are absent from the Project site. The Project would not result in significant loss of habitat for special status animal species and would therefore be consistent with General Plan policies related to wildlife habitat. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
73 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 30
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The proposed Project site is not within an area set aside for the conservation of habitat or sensitive plant or animal species pursuant to a Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. As such, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
74 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 31
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as
defined in §15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
c. Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Archaeological resources are places where human activity has measurably altered the earth or left deposits of physical remains. Archaeological resources may be either prehistoric (before the introduction of writing in a particular area) or historic (after the introduction of writing). The majority of such places in this region are associated with either Native American or Euro-American occupation of the area. The most frequently encountered prehistoric and early historic Native American archaeological sites are village settlements with residential areas and sometimes cemeteries; temporary camps where food and raw materials were collected; smaller, briefly occupied sites where tools were manufactured or repaired; and special-use areas like caves, rock shelters, and sites of rock art. Historic archaeological sites may include foundations or features such as privies, corrals, and trash dumps.

The impact analyses in this section are based on a Cultural Resources Assessment for the Tentative Tract Map 6307, San Joaquin, California, prepared for the Project by Rincon Consultants, Inc. on March 6, 2020, which is included in Appendix C.

RESPONSES
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
75 □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 32
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. A search of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (SSJVIC) located at the California State University, Bakersfield on February 26, 2020 was performed on behalf of the Project.

The search was performed to identify previously conducted cultural resources studies and previously recorded cultural resources within the project site and a 0.5-mile radius surrounding it. The CHRIS search included a review of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), the Office of Historic Preservation Historic Properties Directory, the Built Environment Resources Directory, and the Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility list.

The SSJVIC records search identified six previously conducted cultural resources studies that have been performed within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project site: FR-00116, FR-00631, FR-00632, FR-02532, FR-02911, and FR-02937. No cultural resources studies were completed on the Project site, and two were completed adjacent to the Project site. Additionally, the records search identified two previously recorded cultural resources within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project site, which included a section of the Southern Pacific Railroad and a historic irrigation canal.

There are no recorded cultural resources within the Project area that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, for the California State Historic Landmarks.

The discovery of human remains is regulated by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, which states that:

In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation…until the coroner…has determined…that the remains are not subject to…provisions of law concerning investigation of the circumstances, manner and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible….

The coroner shall make his or her determination within two working days from the time the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, notifies the coroner of the discovery or recognition of the human remains. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and…has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission.

Although no significant cultural or archaeological resources, paleontological resources or human remains have been identified in the Project area, the possibility exists that such resources or remains may 76 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 33
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
be discovered during Project site preparation, excavation and/or grading activities. Compliance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 would reduce potential impacts to human remains and Mitigation Measure CUL – 1 would be implemented to reduce potential impacts to archaeological and historical resources. Impacts are less than significant impacts with mitigation.

Mitigation Measures:

CUL – 1: Should evidence of prehistoric archeological resources be discovered during construction, the contractor shall halt all work within 25 feet of the find and the resource shall be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist.If evidence of any archaeological, cultural, and/or historical deposits is found, hand excavation and/or mechanical excavation shall proceedto evaluate thedeposits for determinationof significance asdefinedby the CEQA guidelines. The archaeologist shall submit reports, to the satisfaction of the City of San Joaquin, describing the testing program and subsequent results. These reports shall identify any program mitigation that the project proponent shall complete in order to mitigate archaeological impacts (including resource recovery and/or avoidance testing and analysis, removal, reburial, and curation of archaeological resources). 77 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 34
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
VI. ENERGY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
The energy requirements for the proposed Project were determined using the construction and operational estimates generated from the CalEEMod output files (refer to Appendix A). The calculation worksheets for fuel consumption rates for off-road construction equipment and on-road vehicles are provided in Appendix A.

RESPONSES
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project includes the subdivision of the approximately 5.06- gross acre site into 44 residential duplex lots with internal roads, landscaping, and a six-foot block wall along Main Street. The Project would increase energy usage on a vacant site that is presently demanding minimal energy.

During construction, the Project would consume energy in two general forms: (1) the fuel energy consumed by construction vehicles and equipment; and (2) bound energy in construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass.

Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards provide guidance on construction techniques to maximize energy conservation and it is expected that contractors and owners have a strong financial incentive to use recycled materials and products originating from nearby sources in order to reduce materials costs.

As such, it is anticipated that materials used in construction and construction vehicle fuel energy would not involve the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy. 78 □ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 35
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Operational Project energy consumption would occur for multiple purposes, including but not limited to, building heating and cooling, refrigeration, lighting and electronics. Operational energy would also be consumed during each vehicle trip associated with the proposed use. CalEEMod was utilized to generate the estimated energy demand of the proposed Project, and the results are provided in Table 4 and in Appendix A.

Table 4: Annual Project Energy Consumption
Land Use Electricity Use
in kWh/year
Natural Gas Use
in kBTU/year
Single Family
Housing
411,250 1,712,142
The proposed Project would be required to comply with Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, which provide minimum efficiency standards related to various building features, including appliances, water and space heating and cooling equipment, building insulation and roofing, and lighting.

Implementation of Title 24 standards significantly increases energy savings, and it is generally assumed that compliance with Title 24 ensures projects would not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy.

As discussed in Impact XVII – Transportation/Traffic, at build-out the Project is expected to generate 415 trips per weekday, 420 trips on Saturdays and 376 trips on Sundays, many of which would be peak hour trips. This would result in approximately 1,009,941 vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per year. The length of these trips and the individual vehicle fuel efficiencies are not known; therefore, the resulting energy consumption cannot be accurately calculated. Adopted federal vehicle fuel standards have continually improved since their original adoption in 1975 and assists in avoiding the inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary use of energy by vehicles.

As discussed previously, the proposed Project would be required to implement and be consistent with existing energy design standards at the local and state level. The Project would be subject to energy conservation requirements in the California Energy Code and CALGreen. Adherence to state code requirements would ensure that the Project would not result in wasteful and inefficient use of nonrenewable resources due to building operation. Any impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? 79 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 36
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Less Than Significant Impact. The CEC recently adopted the 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report. The 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report provides the results of the CEC’s assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these issues would require action if the State is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other environmental goals while maintaining energy reliability and controlling costs. The 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report covers a broad range of topics, including decarbonizing buildings, integrating renewables, energy efficiency, energy equity, integrating renewable energy, updates on Southern California electricity reliability, climate adaptation activities for the energy sector, natural gas assessment, transportation energy demand forecasts, and the California Energy Demand Forecast.

As indicated above, energy usage on the Project site during construction would be temporary in nature and would be relatively small in comparison to the State’s available energy sources. In addition, energy usage associated with operation of the proposed project would be relatively small in comparison to the region’s available energy sources, and energy impacts would be negligible at the regional level. Because California’s energy conservation planning actions are conducted at a regional level, and because the project’s total impact on regional energy supplies would be minor, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct California’s energy conservation plans as described in the CEC’s 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report.

For the above reasons, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, and impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
80 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 37
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a. Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil?
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18-1-B of the most recently
adopted Uniform Building Code
81 □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 38
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
San Joaquin is located in the central part of the Central Valley, which is a nearly flat northwest-southeast trending basin approximately 450 miles long and approximately 75 miles wide. The City of San Joaquin is located on soil types characterized by a relatively thin section of sedimentary rock overlying a granitic basement layer. The hazards due to ground-shaking are considered low due to the relative distance of the City from seismic faults. The Coalinga Fault, located 40 miles away, is the nearest known active fault.

The City of San Joaquin is between the San Andreas Fault and the Owens Valley Fault. The Owens Valley Fault is 100 miles to the east and the San Andreas Fault is 50 miles to the west of the City. Other nearby faults include the White Wolf Fault, the Kern Front Fault and Edison Fault in Kern County. The City of San Joaquin is located in a Seismic Zone VI, as defined by the California Uniform Building Code. The potential for amplification from ground shaking is high in Zone VI; however, the distance from active faults lessens the potential effects of seismic activity.

RESPONSES
a-i) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication

42. a-ii) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking?
82 □ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 39
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
a-iii) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? a-iv) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project site is located on an approximately 5.06-acre site, in northeastern San Joaquin, inside the City limits, east of the corner of Main Street and Arizona Avenue.

The proposed site is not located in an earthquake fault zone as delineated by the 1972 Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map Act.2 The nearest known potentially active fault is the Coalinga Fault Zone, located approximately 40 miles away. No active faults have been mapped within the Project boundaries, so there is little potential for fault rupture. It is anticipated that the proposed Project site would be subject to some ground acceleration and ground shaking associated with seismic activity during its design life. The proposed Project site would be engineered and constructed in strict accordance with the earthquake resistant design requirements contained in the latest edition of the California Building Code (CBC) for Seismic Zone VI, as well as Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, and therefore would avoid potential seismically induced hazards on planned structures.

The proposed Project site has a generally flat topography, which would preclude the likeliness of a landslide. The impact of seismic or landslide hazards on the Project would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction activities associated with the Project involve ground preparation work for the new housing development and associated improvements. These activities could expose barren soils to sources of wind or water, resulting in the potential for erosion and sedimentation on and off the Project site. During construction, nuisance flow caused by minor rain could flow off-site. The City and/or contractor would be required to employ appropriate sediment and erosion control BMPs as part of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would be required in the California National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). As such, any impacts would be considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
2 Earthquake Hazard Zones, California Department of Conservation. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/. Accessed August 2024.
83 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 40
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Less Than Significant Impact. See Impact VI a). The site is not at significant risk from ground shaking, liquefaction, or landslide and is otherwise considered geologically stable. The Project site is comprised of one main soil type: Merced clay, slightly saline. 3 This soil type is considered very poorly drained, with medium runoff. The City of San Joaquin is not recognized by the California Geological Survey (CGS) as being in an area of liquification.4
The City of San Joaquin is on relatively flat terrain which precludes the occurrence of landslides.

Subsidence is typically related to over-extraction of groundwater from certain types of geologic formations where the water is partly responsible for supporting the ground surface. The City of San Joaquin is recognized by the U.S. Geological Service as being in an area of subsidence due to groundwater pumping.5 However, ongoing potential impacts of groundwater depletion and subsidence are constantly being monitored by USGS through a system of extensometers positioned throughout the San Joaquin Valley. Continuous measurements and aquifer-system response analysis enables appropriate governing of parameters set to mitigate subsidence impacts in the region. Impacts are considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the most recently adopted Uniform Building Code creating substantial risks to life or property?
Less Than Significant Impact. The California Building Code (CBC) is administered by the California Building Standards Commission, which is responsible for coordinating all building standards. The purpose of the CBC is to establish minimum standards to safeguard the public health, safety, and general welfare through structural strength, means of egress facilities, and general stability by regulating and 3 U.S. Department of Agriculture. Natural Resource Conservation Service. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed August 2024. 4 California Geological Survey Seismic Hazards Program: Liquification Zones. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/cgs-seismic-hazards-programliquefaction-zones/resource/e3b8d49f-5483-422d-8ba7-1a0b7ebb4309. Accessed August 2024. 5 U.S. Geological Service. Areas of Land Subsidence in California. https://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidence-areas.html Accessed August 2024.
84 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 41
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures within its jurisdiction. The provisions of the CBC apply to the construction, alteration, movement, replacement, and demolition of every building or structure or any appurtenances connected or attached to such buildings or structures within the jurisdiction of the state of California.

The shrink/swell potential of expansive soils on the proposed Project site are considered high to moderately high. 6 Compliance with the CBC would ensure that potentially expansive soils, if encountered, are adequately addressed. CBC requirements include activities such as removing expansive soils and placing a mat of properly compacted, non-expansive fill prior to placing foundation, structures, utilities, and road beds. In some cases, potentially expansive soils can be treated or mixed with other materials to reduce its expansive potential to acceptable levels. As such, implementation of the required CBC would ensure that potential impacts associated with expansive soils would be less than significant. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Impact. The proposed Project does not include the construction,replacement, or disturbance of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. The Project would be required to tie into the existing City sewer system (See Utilities section for more details). Therefore, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Paleontological resources are valued for the information they yield about the history of the earth and its past ecological settings. A review of the cultural and historical resources was provided in Section 3.5 and 3.17, Cultural Resources and Tribal Resources, respectively. There are currently no unique geologic features located in the Project Area.

While the discovery of paleontological resources within the Project footprint is considered unlikely, Project buildout would adhere to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 which requires all earth-disturbing work to be temporarily suspended or redirected until a qualified archaeologist has 6 2024 Fresno County Hazard Mitigation Plan. May 2024. chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.fresnocountyca.gov/files/sharedassets/county/v/1/resources/hazard-mitigationplan/draft-2024-fresno-county-hazard-mitigation-plan.pdf. Page 145. Accessed August 2024. 85 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 42
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
evaluated the nature and significance of the records, in accordance with federal, State, and local guidelines. In addition, Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would be implemented in the case of any inadvertent discoveries. With adherence to these regulatory requirements and measures, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation.

Mitigation Measure
GEO – 1: In the event of a fossil discovery by construction personnel, the construction contractor shall halt all construction activities within the immediate vicinity of the fossil, and a Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall be retained to evaluate the find prior to resuming construction activity. If it is determined the fossil(s) is (are) scientifically significant, the Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall complete the following conditions to mitigate impacts to significant fossil resources:
• If fossils are discovered, the Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall have the authority to halt or temporarily divert construction equipment within 50 feet of the find until the Qualified Professional Paleontologist evaluate the discovery and determine if the fossil may be considered significant. Bulk matrix sampling may be necessary to recover small invertebrates or microvertebrates from within paleontologically sensitive deposits.
• Once salvaged, significant fossils shall be identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level, prepared to a curation-ready condition, and curated in a scientific institution with a permanent paleontological collection along with all pertinent field notes, photos, data, and maps. Fossils of undetermined significance at the time of collection may also warrant curation at the discretion of the Qualified Professional Paleontologist.
• The Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall submit a report describing the results of the paleontological monitoring efforts associated with the paleontological monitoring efforts associated with the project. The report shall include a summary of the field and laboratory methods, an overview of the project geology and paleontology, a list of taxa recovered (if any), an analysis of fossils recovered (if any) and their scientific significance, and recommendations. The report shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 86 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 43
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
The greenhouse gas emissions for the proposed Project were determined using the construction and operational estimates generated from the CalEEMod output files (refer to Appendix A).

RESPONSES
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Less than Significant Impact. Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. Therefore, the cumulative global emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change can be attributed to every nation, region, and city, and virtually every individual on Earth. A project’s GHG emissions are at a micro-scale relative to global emissions, but could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to a significant cumulative macro-scale impact.

Implementation of the proposed project would contribute to increases of GHG emissions that are associated with global climate change. Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of CO2 and other GHG pollutants, such as CH4 and N2O, from mobile sources and utility usage.

The proposed project’s short-term construction-related and long-term operational GHG emissions for buildout of the proposed project, were estimated using CalEEMod (v.2022.1.1.26). The model quantifies direct GHG emissions from construction and operation (including vehicle use), as well as indirect GHG 87 □ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 44
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
emissions, such as GHG emissions from energy use, solid waste disposal, vegetation planting and/or removal, and water use. Emissions are expressed in annual metric tons of CO2 equivalent units of measure (i.e., MTCO2e), based on the global warming potential of the individual pollutants.

Short-Term Construction GHG Emissions
Estimated increases in GHG emissions associated with construction of the proposed Project are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Year Bio-CO2 NBioCO2Total
CO2
CH4 N2O CO2E
Construction 2024 0.000 65.0 65.0 <0.005 <0.005 65.3
Construction 2025 0.000 270.0 270.0 0.01 <0.005 271
Total 0.000 335.0 335.0 0.01 <0.005 336.3
Notes: Due to rounding, total may be marginally different from CalEEMod output.

MTCO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents
Source: CalEEMod output (Appendix A).

As presented in the table, maximum short-term annual construction emissions of GHG associated with development of the Project are estimated to be 336.3 CO2E. These construction GHG emissions are a onetime release and are comparatively much lower than emissions associated with operational phases of a project. Cumulatively, these construction emissions would not generate a significant contribution to global climate change.

Long-Term Operational GHG Emissions
The long-term operational emissions estimate for buildout of the proposed project, incorporates the potential area source and vehicle emissions, and emissions associated with utility and water usage, and wastewater and solid waste generation. Estimated GHG emissions associated with the buildout of the proposed project is summarized in Table 6. As shown in the following table, the annual GHG emissions associated with buildout of the proposed project would be approximately 573.0 MTCO2e. 88 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 45
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Table 6: Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Category Bio-CO2 NBioCO2Total
CO2
CH4 N2O CO2E
Mobile 0.00 391.0 391.0 0.02 0.02 398.0
Area 8.89 17.8 26.7 0.04 <0.005 27.7
Energy 0.00 129 129.0 0.01 <0.005 130.0
Water 0.56 2.58 3.14 0.06 <0.005 5.02
Waste 3.49 0.00 3.49 0.35 0.00 12.2
Total 12.9 540.0 553.0 0.48 0.02 573.0
Notes: Due to rounding, total may be marginally different from the CalEEMod output files.

MTCO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents
Source: CalEEMod output files.

As demonstrated above, the proposed Project would not generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant.

The short-term annual construction emissions of GHG associated with Project development are estimated to be 65.3 (2024) and 271.0 MTCO2e (2025). As stated previously, short-term construction GHG emissions are a one-time release of GHGs and are not expected to significantly contribute to global climate change over the lifetime of the proposed Project. The annual operational GHG emissions associated with buildout of the proposed project would be approximately 573.0 MTCO2e. The proposed Project would not occur at a scale or scope with potential to contribute substantially or cumulatively to the generation of greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, or conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.

Therefore, this impact would be less than significant.

In conclusion, the proposed Project would not result in any greenhouse gas emission environmental impacts beyond those analyzed in EIR SCH No. 2013091069 for the San Joaquin General Plan. The Project supports the Scoping Plan's targets by introducing design steps to reduce the energy usage, water use, 89 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 46
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
and vehicle miles traveled. Therefore, the Project does not conflict with any plans to reduce GHG emissions. The impact is less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
90 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 47
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS

MATERIALS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e. For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project
area?
f. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
91 □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 48
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
g. Expose people or structures either directly
or indirectly to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is located in the northeastern portion of the City of San Joaquin. The site currently supports an agricultural field.

RESPONSES
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporation. The Project Applicant intends to develop 44 single-family duplex units on an approximately 5.06-acre site. The development would also include access roads, parking, lighting and other associated improvements.

Proposed Project construction activities may involve the use and transport of hazardous materials. These materials may include fuels, oils, mechanical fluids, and other chemicals used during construction.

Transportation, storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials during construction activities would be required to comply with applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Compliance would ensure that human health and the environment are not exposed to hazardous materials. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program through the submission and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan during construction activities to prevent contaminated runoff from leaving the Project site. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur during construction activities.

The operational phase of the proposed Project would occur after construction is completed and residents move in to occupy the residential structures. The proposed Project would include land uses that are 92 □ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 49
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
considered compatible with the surrounding uses. None of these land uses routinely transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materials, or present a reasonably foreseeable release of hazardous materials, with the exception of common residential grade hazardous materials such as household and commercial cleaners, paint, etc. The proposed Project would not create a significant hazard through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through the reasonably foreseeable upset and accidental conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment occur.

A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was performed on behalf of the proposed Project by Rincon Consultants, Inc., report date March 11, 2020 (See Appendix D for full report). The ESA historical resources reviewed indicated that the Project site appears to have been used for agricultural purposes as early as 1937. In general, it appears that the subject property remained used for agricultural purposes from approximately 1937 through the present day. Agricultural land use is typically associated with the use of pesticides and arsenic. Therefore, the former use of the subject property for agricultural purposes is considered a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC). Due to the historical use of the subject property for agriculture purposes, there is a potential that the subject property could be affected with pesticides, or other chemicals used routinely in agricultural production. Soil sampling, as detailed in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, would allow the City to identify the amounts of Pesticides and Organochlorine Pesticides (OCPs) historically used on the property.

Therefore, with implementation of HAZ-1, the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment and any impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures:

HAZ -1 Soil sampling, per California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural properties (August 7, 2008)7 shall be conducted to identify the amounts of OCPs in the soil. If present, OCPs requiring further analysis, per DTSC consultation, are dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane, toxaphene, and dieldrin. Should these OCPs be present, soil remediation shall be conducted until levels are reduced per DTSC guidelines prior to issuance of grading permits.

Additionally, if any level of arsenic is present, further analysis and 7 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision). August 7, 2008. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://dtsc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2018/09/Ag-Guidance-Rev-3-August7-2008-2.pdf. Accessed August 2024. 93 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 50
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
sampling shall meet Human Health Risk Assessment NOTE NUMBER 3, DTSC-SLs approved thresholds. 8 If arsenic levels do not meet the approved thresholds, remedial action shall take place to reduce levels below thresholds prior to issuance of grading permits.

c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less Than Significant Impact. San Joaquin Elementary School is located approximately 0.25 miles west of the proposed Project site. There are no other schools located within the 0.25-mile radius of the proposed Project site. As the proposed Project includes the development of family residences, it is not reasonably foreseeable that the proposed Project would cause a significant impact by emitting hazardous waste or bringing hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.

Residential land uses do not generate, store, or dispose of significant quantities of hazardous materials.

See also Responses a. and b. above regarding hazardous material handling. There would be a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
Less Than Significant Impact. According to the environmental records sources search, five properties having hazardous materials releases were reported ranging from 2,000 feet to 2,550 feet from the Project site. Based on the distance to the subject property, the three releases reported at the intersection of Colorado Avenue and Main Street, 22023 West Colorado Avenue, and 22125 West Colorado Avenue are considered de minimis.

Two nearby release sites lack documentation. The first, 21500 West Manning Avenue, involves a release of gasoline to soil which occurred in February 1992 and the UST case was closed by the Fresno County 8 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Human and Ecological Risk Office. June 2020, revised May 2022. chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://dtsc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2022/02/HHRA-Note-3-June2020-RevisedMay2022A.pdf. Accessed August 2024. 94 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 51
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Department of Public Health in 1992. No documents could be located on GeoTracker. Although there is no documentation of the closure of the site, based on the soil-only nature of the release, depth to groundwater (greater than 75 feet), and the distance to the Project site, this release site is considered de minimis. The second nearby site, 22050 West Colorado, involves the release of a solvent or non-petroleum hydrocarbon, which occurred in June 2004. Following the release, petroleum hydrocarbon product was removed from the adjacent storm drain. The status of this release site is listed as “Open – site assessment as of 5/28/2009”. No documents could be located on GeoTracker. Although there is no documentation of the site, based on the surficial nature of the release, depth to groundwater and the distance to the subject property, this release site is considered de minimis. Therefore, this is a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
Less Than Significant Impact. There are no private or public airstrips in the Project vicinity. The William Robert Johnson Municipal Airport is located approximately 14 miles to the northwest of the proposed Project site, in the City of Mendota. Thus, any impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project has been designed for adequate emergency access and has been reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with City safety policies. The internal roadways would be designed with sufficient clearances for emergency vehicles to access the entire site. Therefore, the Project would not impair or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Any impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
95 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 52
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
g) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
No Impact. The site is within the City of San Joaquin and is completely surrounded by developed urban uses. The site is currently vacant. There are no wildlands on or near the Project site. There is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
96 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 53
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER

QUALITY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or
ground water quality?
b. Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which
would:
i. Result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off- site;
ii. substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or
offsite;
iii. create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff; or
iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
97 □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 54
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER

QUALITY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management
plan?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of San Joaquin’s water system includes three active water wells (two running and one inactive) that have a theoretical pumping capacity of 3,500 gallons per minute. Well No. 3 at the City Corporation Yard (built in 1968), Well No. 4 at Main and California Streets (built in 1978) and Well No. 5 at Cherry Lane (built in 2006) supply water through the water distribution lines. The City has no water storage capacity. The City’s Water Master Plan includes a total of six wells at build-out of the General Plan.9 The City’s wells and water distribution system were constructed in 1920, upon City incorporation. Much of this original system exists in the older parts of town. The existing pipelines in these areas have become obsolete with age and are typically characterized by leaks, corrosion, and build-up. The pipes that are more than 40 years old have developed build-ups, which impede the water flow.10The existing water pipe in the vicinity of the proposed Project; however, has been recently replaced and is functioning at designed capacity.11 Water consumption in 2009 was approximately 0.705 mgd or 489 gallons per minute (gpm).12
9 City of San Joaquin General Plan, Setting – 2.2.2. Page 2-5. https://cityofsanjoaquin.org/home/general-plan/. Accessed August 2024. 10 City of San Joaquin General Plan. Section 2.2.2 – Municipal Water System. chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://cityofsanjoaquin.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Draft-EIR-Complete.pdf. Accessed August 2024.
11Ibid.
12 City of San Joaquin General Plan, Setting – 2.2.2. Page 2-5. https://cityofsanjoaquin.org/home/general-plan/. Accessed August 2024. 98 □ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 55
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study

RESPONSES
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project site is currently vacant. Grading, excavation and loading activities associated with construction activities could temporarily increase runoff, erosion, and sedimentation. Construction activities also could result in soil compaction and wind erosion effects that could adversely affect soils and reduce the revegetation potential at construction sites and staging areas.

Three general sources of potential short-term construction-related stormwater pollution associated with the proposed project are: 1) the handling, storage, and disposal of construction materials containing pollutants; 2) the maintenance and operation of construction equipment; and 3) earth moving activities which, when not controlled, may generate soil erosion and transportation, via storm runoff or mechanical equipment. Generally, routine safety precautions for handling and storing construction materials may effectively mitigate the potential pollution of stormwater by these materials. These same types of common sense, “good housekeeping” procedures can be extended to non-hazardous stormwater pollutants such as sawdust and other solid wastes.

Poorly maintained vehicles and heavy equipment leaking fuel, oil, antifreeze, or other fluids on the construction site are also common sources of stormwater pollution and soil contamination. In addition, grading activities can greatly increase erosion processes. Two general strategies are recommended to prevent construction silt from entering local storm drains. First, erosion control procedures should be implemented for those areas that must be exposed. Secondly, the area should be secured to control offsite migration of pollutants. These Best Management Practices (BMPs) would be required in theStormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be prepared priorto commencement of Project construction. When properly designed and implemented, these “good-housekeeping” practices are expected to reduce shortterm construction-related impacts to less than significant.

In accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Program, the Project would be required to comply with existing regulatory requirements to prepare a SWPPP designed to control erosion and the loss of topsoil to the extent practicable using BMPs that the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) has deemed effective in controlling erosion, sedimentation, runoff during construction activities. The specific controls are subject to review and approval by the RWQCB and are an existing regulatory requirement.

The City of San Joaquin would provide water to the Project site and the Project would be required to tie into the City’s existing water service infrastructure and any required infrastructure improvements, upon approval of the Project. The Project would comply with all City ordinances and standards to assure 99 CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 56
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
proper grading and drainage. Compliance with all local, state, and federal regulations would prevent violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The Project would be required to prepare a grading and drainage plan for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits, which would ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Therefore, any impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less Than Significant Impact. Project implementation would result in an increased demand for water.

The City of San Joaquin relies on groundwater as its sole water supply source. The City currently operates three water wells that have a theoretical pumping capacity of 3,500 gallons per minute. Well No. 3 at the City Corporation Yard (built in 1968), Well No. 4 at Main and California Streets (built in 1978) and Well No. 5 at Cherry Lane (built in 2006) supply water through the water distribution line. The City has virtually no water storage capacity.13
The City of San Joaquin Water Master Plan (WMP) was developed to define the existing (1995) water supply network, determine future water supply needs, develop and upgrade the existing water system to meet future needs, and to develop a capital improvement program. The WMP recommends construction of 12-inch main lines in Manning Avenue and Colusa Avenue, a 10-inch main in Manning Avenue, an 8-inch main in Fifth Street, a 6-inch main in Nevada Avenue, an additional emergency power generator at Well 4, and construction of a new well and pump in the City. 14 With implementation of the projects and management actions identified in the WMP, the City’s groundwater supplies are anticipated to be sustainable and available to meet the projected demands of its Public Water System service area.

Additionally, a Water Capacity Assessment for the City of San Joaquin was prepared in 2021 which demonstrates that the City can supply the daily demand of 1,198 additional households with the existing water supply sources. The City Manager confirmed that the 2021 conditions have not changed and the City does have capacity for 44 additional housing units.15 13 City of San Joaquin General Plan, Setting – 2.2.2. Page 2-5. https://cityofsanjoaquin.org/home/general-plan/. Accessed August 2024. 14 Ibid. Public Facilities and Services Element, Page 12-1. 15 Email Communication with Elizabeth Cabrera, City Manager, on 8/21/2024. 100
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 57
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
The site is currently designated for urban uses in the General Plan and as such, water use at the site has been accounted for in the City’s planning documents. Project demands for groundwater resources would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies and/or otherwise interfere with groundwater recharge efforts being implemented by the City of San Joaquin16. Future demand can be met with continued groundwater pumping and conservation measures. Additionally, compliance with existing State regulations would ensure that impacts to groundwater supply would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i. result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite; ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite;
iii. create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
Less Than Significant Impact. Surrounding the proposed Project are Main Street, agricultural fields, and single-family residences to the north; Arizona Avenue, walnut orchards and single-family residences to the south; walnut orchards to the east; and single-family residences to the west.

The proposed Project would change drainage patterns of the site through the installation of impervious surfaces and structures (houses, driveways, streets, etc.) and would require grading to facilitate proper stormwater drainage and connection to existing stormwater facilities. Operational stormwater will be routed to the California Avenue Basin. The City has reviewed the Project site and grading plan and has determined that the California Avenue Basin has the capacity for Project implementation. Stormwater 16 City of San Joaquin General Plan Update and SOI Expansion Draft EIR. chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://cityofsanjoaquin.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Draft-EIR-Complete.pdf . Page 3.9-7.

Accessed August 2024.
101
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 58
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
during construction would be managed as part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).

A copy of the SWPPP would be retained on-site during construction.

The proposed Project site is located outside of any Flood Zone or Special Flood Hazard Areas, as indicated by FEMA flood hazard map 06019C2550H, effective 2/18/2009. The proposed development would be built in accordance with the current City ordinances and California Building Code regarding construction outside of flood zones. The Project would be designed for adequate storm drainage.

Accordingly, the chance of flooding (and therefore the release of pollutants due to flooding) at the site is remote. Impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d) In flood hazard, tsunami or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? No Impact. As discussed in Impact X(c), the proposed Project site is located outside of any Flood Zone or Special Flood Hazard Areas.

There are also no inland water bodies that could potentially impact the Project that are susceptible to a seiche The Project site is more than 100 miles from the Pacific Ocean, a condition that precludes the possibility of inundation by tsunami. There are no steep slopes that would be susceptible to a mudflow in the Project vicinity, nor are there any volcanically active features that could produce a mudflow in the City of San Joaquin. There would be no impacts.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
No Impact. The Project would not conflict with any water quality control plans or sustainable groundwater management plan. However, as mentioned in Section c., all new development within the City of San Joaquin Planning Area must conform to standards and plans contained in the San Joaquin Stormwater Drainage Master Plan. By conforming to all standards and policies as outlined, there would be no impacts associated with the Project.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
102
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 59
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Physically divide an established
community?
b. Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is located in northeastern San Joaquin, inside the City limits, east of the corner of Main Street and Arizona Avenue. The City lies in the Central San Joaquin Valley region, in the central portion of Fresno County. The City is approximately 8.5 miles south of State Route (SR) 180 and 5.5 miles northwest of SR 145. The proposed Project includes development of 44 duplex units on an approximately

5.06-acre site. Entitlements needed to accommodate the proposed Project include a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and a Text Amendment to the City of San Joaquin Zoning Ordinance. The Project applicant proposes a Zone Change from R-1 (Single-family Residential) to R-2 (Multi-Family Residential) and a General Plan Amendment converting Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential. Additionally, the applicant requests approval of a Text Amendment to the City of San Joaquin Zoning Ordinance. Part 6, R-2 Multi-Family Residential Zoning; Section 154.006.03 Development Standards currently require a minimum side yard of 10 feet to the adjoining Lot when a “0” lot line development is proposed. As part of the Project, the text would be amended to state when a zero “0” lot line development with a duplex building, defined under Section 154.003.01 Definitions of the City of San Joaquin Zoning Ordinance, the interior zero lot line shall divide a 1” air space equally between two fire rated walls dividing the duplex into two single family residential units, the opposite side yard shall provide for a minimum setback of 5 feet, resulting in a minimum 10 feet between buildings on the adjoining lot as intended by the current development standards.

RESPONSES
a) Physically divide an established community?
103
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 60
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
The Project includes the development of 44 residential units within the City of San Joaquin. The proposed Project is located east of the developed portion of the City, is designated and zoned for residential development, and would extend existing residential development further east. The proposed development has no characteristics that would physically divide the City of San Joaquin and would serve as a natural extension of the existing urban development. Any impacts would be less than significant. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the General Plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact.

Surrounding the proposed Project are Main Street, agricultural fields, and single-family residences to the north; Arizona Avenue, walnut orchards and single-family residences to the south; walnut orchards to the east; and single-family residences to the west. Upon approval of the Project required entitlements, including a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and a Text Amendment to the City of San Joaquin Zoning Ordinance , the project would not conflict with any applicable land use plans, policies or regulations and would comply with the City of San Joaquin’s General Plan.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
104
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 61
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Fresno County has been a leading producer of minerals because of the abundance and wide variety of mineral resources that are present in the county. Extracted resources include aggregate products (sand and gravel), fossil fuels (oil and coal), metals (chromite, copper, gold, mercury, and tungsten), and other minerals used in construction or industrial applications (asbestos, high-grade clay, diatomite, granite, gypsum, and limestone). Aggregate and petroleum are the county’s most significant extractive resources and play an important role in maintaining the county’s overall economy.17

RESPONSES
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 17 Fresno County General Plan October 2000, Open Space and Conservation Element. Page 5-9. https://www.fresnocountyca.gov/files/sharedassets/county/v/1/vision-files/files/18117-2000-general-plan-policy-document.pdf. Accessed August 2024.
105
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 62
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
No Impact. There are no known mineral resources in the proposed Project area and the site is not included in a State-classified mineral resource zones. No mineral resource locations are within the vicinity of the City of San Joaquin.18 Therefore, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
18 Fresno County General Plan Update Background Report, October 2000. Chapter 7: Natural Resources, Figure 7-13. https://www.fresnocountyca.gov/files/sharedassets/county/v/1/vision-files/files/8398-background_report_june04.pdf. Accessed August 2024. 106
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 63
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XIII. NOISE
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the project in
excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c. For a project located within the vicinity of
a private airstrip or an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise
levels?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Noise is often described as unwanted sound. Although sound can be easily measured, the perception of noise and the physical response to sound complicate the analysis of its impact on people. The City of San Joaquin is impacted by a multitude of noise sources. Principal noise sources include traffic on roadways, agricultural noise and industrial noise. Mobile sources of noise, especially cars and trucks, are the most common and significant sources of noise in most communities, and they are predominant sources of noise in the City. The Project site is located in an area with a mix of uses. The predominant noise sources in the Project area include traffic on local roadways, residential noise (lawn mowers, audio equipment, voices, etc.), and potential noise from the nearby agricultural land uses. 107
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 64
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study

RESPONSES
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact.

Short‐term (Construction) Noise Impacts
Proposed Project construction related activities would involve temporary noise sources. Typical construction-related equipment includes graders, trenchers, small tractors and excavators. During the proposed Project construction, noise from construction related activities would contribute to the noise environment in the immediate vicinity. Table 7 indicates the anticipated noise levels of the typical construction-related equipment (i.e., graders, trenchers, tractors) based on a distance of 50-feet between the equipment and the sensitive noise receptor.19
Table 7: Typical Construction Noise Levels
Equipment Typical Noise Level
(dBA) 50 ft from Source
Air Compressor 80
Backhoe 80
Compactor 82
Concrete Mixer 85
Dozer 85
Generator 82
Grader 85
Jack Hammer 88
Loader 85
Paver 85
Truck 84
19 The Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Table 7-1.

September 2018. https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impactassessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf.. Accessed August 2024. 108
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 65
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
The distinction between short-term construction noise impacts and long-term operational noise impacts is a typical one in both CEQA documents and local noise ordinances, which generally recognize the reality that short-term noise from construction is inevitable and cannot be mitigated beyond a certain level. Thus, local agencies frequently tolerate short-term noise at levels that they would not accept for permanent noise sources. A more severe approach would be impractical and might preclude the kind of construction activities that are to be expected from time to time in urban environments. Most residents of urban areas recognize this reality and expect to hear construction activities on occasion.

Long‐term (Operational) Noise Impacts
The primary source of on-going noise generated by the Project would be from vehicles traveling on internal access roads and from traffic traveling along Main Street and Arizona Avenue. Project implementation would result in an increase in traffic on some roadways in the Project area. However, the relatively low number of new trips associated with the Project is not likely to increase the ambient noise levels by a significant amount. The area is active with vehicles, residential housing, and agricultural land uses, so the proposed Project would not introduce a new significant source of noise that isn’t already occurring in the area.

Vibration Levels
Typical outdoor sources of perceptible ground borne vibration are construction equipment, steelwheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. Construction vibrations can be transient, random, or continuous. Construction associated with the proposed Project includes construction of 44 duplex units and the associated improvements. The site construction would also include internal access roads, street lighting, site landscaping and additional related improvements.

The approximate threshold of vibration perception is 65 VdB, while 85 VdB is the vibration acceptable only if there are an infrequent number of events per day. Table 8 describes the typical construction equipment vibration levels.20
Table 8: Typical Construction Vibration Levels
Equipment VdB at 25 ft
Small Bulldozer 58
Jackhammer 79
20 Ibid.
109
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 66
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Vibration from construction activities would be temporary and not exceed the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) threshold for the nearest rural residences, which are located south and west of the corner of Main Street and Arizona Avenue.

Therefore, the impact is considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The Project is not located within the vicinity of an airport land use plan, and the City of San Joaquin does not contain an airport or airstrip. Therefore, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
110
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 67
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Induce substantial population growth in
an area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
San Joaquin’s population has exhibited a slight decrease since 2010. The population in 2010 was 4,00121, while the population as of January 2024 was 3,616.22 This represents an approximate decrease of 9.6%.

Estimates for 2024 shows that the City has 937 housing units with an average of 4.0 people per household.23

RESPONSES
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Less Than Significant Impacts. There would be 44 new homes associated with the proposed Project and the site is currently vacant. Based on data regarding persons per dwelling, the site would provide 21 City of San Joaquin General Plan Update Background Report, October 2006. Page 4-1. 22 E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2020-2024. California Department of Finance, January 2024. https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-5-population-and-housing-estimates-for-cities-counties-and-the-state-2020-2024/.

Accessed August 2024.
23 Ibid.
111
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 68
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
additional housing for approximately 176 people. This is a relatively small population and is not expected to affect any regional population, housing or employment projections anticipated by City documents.

The site is within the eastern City limits of San Joaquin and is currently designated as low-density residential (1 – 8 units/acre) by the City’s General Plan, which could accommodate approximately 40 units (8 units/acre x 5.06 acres). As part of the Project, the land use designation would be changed to medium-density residential which has a potential buildout of 8-20 units/acre, which could potentially accommodate approximately 101 units (20 units/acre x 5.06 acres). The Project is proposing 44 units, which is 4 units greater than what was anticipated in the General Plan, which would increase the population by an additional 16 people over what was accounted for. This unplanned population increase is minor in nature and can be accommodated by the City. Entitlements needed to accommodate the proposed Project include a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow for decreased setbacks and a site plan review.

The City of San Joaquin’s primary industry is agriculture, but there is sufficient labor force in the area to support many other types of industries. The unemployment rate in Fresno County as of June, 2024 is

7.7%24, which is above the national rate of 4.3%.25 As such, it is reasonable to assume that the construction demand generated by Project implementation would be fulfilled by the local workforce. In conclusion, the Project implementation would not displace substantial numbers of people and instead provide needed housing. Any impacts are considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
24 State of California Employment Development Department. Fresno County Profile. https://labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/cgi/dataBrowsing/localAreaProfileQSResults.asp?state=true&selectedarea=Fresno%20County%20%20%20 %20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 %20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&menuChoice=localAreaPro&geogArea=0604000019. Accessed August 2024. 25 U.S. Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. July 2024. chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf. Accessed August 2024. 112
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 69
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities,
the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:

Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
CAL FIRE provides fire protection for the City with a station located in the community of Tranquillity, approximately four miles northwest of the City. Average response time is 13.9 minutes. Structures within the City generally receive a rating of six on the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Fire Protection Rating Scale.26
Police protection services are provided by the Fresno Couty Sheriff with a satellite Office in the City which is located at 21925 Manning Avenue, approximately 0.6 miles southwest of the Project site. This 26 City of San Joaquin General Plan, July 2014. Setting, Page 2-8. 113
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 70
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
office is used for shift changes and has no public access. The patrol area covers over 2,400 square miles of western Fresno County. Services available at this station include patrol and detective services, youth services, crime prevention, and community policing initiatives. Current contracts provide for 10 hours of police services daily, which equates to approximately 0.8 full-time equivalent officers or 0.22 officers per 1,000 residents.27
Educational services are provided by the Golden Plains Unified School District. The School District operates four elementary schools and one high school (9-12). The high school is located approximately four miles northwest in the community of Tranquillity. The elementary schools are located in the communities of Cantua, Helm, Tranquillity and within the City of San Joaquin. San Joaquin Elementary School is located at 8535 9th Street and has a design capacity of 400 students. Since the 1998-99 school year, enrollment has exceeded 800 students annually, and temporary buildings have been located on the campus to address capacity needs.

RESPONSES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

Fire protection?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Fresno County Fire Protection District provides fire protection service in the City. No additional fire equipment, personnel, or services are anticipated to be required by Project implementation, as the site has been designated and zoned for residential development. In addition, the Project applicant would be required to pay all associated impact fees related to public services. As such, any impacts are less than significant.

Police Protection?
Less Than Significant Impact. San Joaquin contracts with the Fresno County Sheriff’s Office for law enforcement services. Implementation of the proposed Project would result in an increase in demand for police services; however, this increase would be minimal and would not trigger the need for new or physically altered police facilities. No additional police personnel or equipment is anticipated. In 27 Ibid.
114
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 71
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
addition, each home would be assessed a public safety impact fee by the City that is used to make capital improvements for the Police Department. Impacts are less than significant.

Schools?
Less Than Significant Impact. Since the proposed Project includes the addition of approximately 44 residential duplex units, the number of students in the school district would increase. New development projects are required by state law to pay development impact fees to the school districts at the time of building permit issuance. These impact fees are used by the school districts to maintain existing and develop new facilities, as needed.

While development of the 44 residential units alone is not expected to require the alteration of existing schools or construction of new school facilities, the development would contribute to the cumulative need for increased school facilities. The timing of when new school facilities would be required or details about size and location cannot be known until such facilities are planned and proposed, and any attempt to analyze impacts to a potential future facility would be speculative. As the future new school facilities are further planned and developed, they would be subject to their own separate CEQA environmental review in order to identify and mitigate any potential environmental impacts. Therefore, the impact is less than significant.

Parks?
Less Than Significant Impact. The closest park to the proposed Project is the San Joaquin Sports Park located approximately 0.3 miles northwest and the Peter Rusconi Park located approximately 0.5 miles southwest. The Project would be required to pay City Park facility impact fees to compensate for any service demand increase on existing parks within the San Joaquin area. The Project applicant would be required to comply with the Municipal Code and Ordinances. Impacts are less than significant.

Other public facilities?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project is within the land use and growth projections identified in the City’s General Plan and other infrastructure studies. The Project, therefore, would not result in increased demand for, or impacts on, other public facilities such as library services. Any impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
115
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 72
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XVI. RECREATION
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
There are three parks within the City of San Joaquin; Peter Rusconi Park, San Joaquin Sports Park and the San Joaquin Elementary School playground. The first two parks are managed by the City of San Joaquin’s Parks and Community Services Department. This department also supervises and coordinates a wide variety of community programs and activities.

RESPONSES
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Applicant intends to develop 44 duplex units on an approximately 5.06-acre site. The site is currently inside the eastern City limits of San Joaquin. To accommodate this Project, the City would need to approve a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Text Amendment to the City of San Joaquin Zoning Ordinance. However, the increase of approximately 176 persons resulting from the Project would have a relatively small impact on existing 116
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 73
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
recreational facilities. In order to implement the goals and objectives of the City’s General Plan, and to mitigate the impacts caused by future development in the City, park facilities must be constructed. The City Council has determined that a Park Facilities Impact Fee is warranted in order to finance these public facilities and to pay for each development’s fair share of the construction and acquisition costs. The Project Applicant would be required to pay development impact fees as determined by the City of San Joaquin’s impact fees. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant impacts.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
117
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 74
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XVII. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City is bisected by two main thoroughfares – Colorado Avenue, which bisects the City from northwest to southeast and Manning Avenue which crosses the City from west to east. The downtown is designed in a traditional grid pattern, but the rest of the City is laid out in a mixture of loops and culde-sacs. Proposed Project access would be from Main Street and Arizona Avenue. Main Street is considered a collector street and runs perpendicular to Colorado Avenue and connects with Manning Avenue. It collects traffic from several local neighborhoods near downtown and the west side of the City.

Arizona Avenue is a local street with a primary function of allowing users to access the desired land use.

Local streets are designed for low speeds to maintain safe, quiet neighborhoods and to enable motorists to easily find their destinations. The City has established a minimum Level of Service of D for intersections and roadways.28
28 City of San Joaquin. General Plan Background Report. June 2011. Chapter 5 – Circulation. chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://cityofsanjoaquin.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/San-Joaquin-BackgroundReport.pdf. Page 63. Accessed August 2024. 118
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 75
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
The City of San Joaquin is a member of the Fresno County Rural Transit Agency (FCRTA). The Joint Powers Agency is composed of the 13 rural incorporated cities and the County of Fresno. FCRTA is responsible for overall coordination of intra-city and inter-city service for the rural public transit services.

Under an inter-agency agreement with the City of San Joaquin, the FCRTA contracts with the Fresno County Economic Opportunities Commission (FCEOC) as the Rural Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (Rural CTSA). This Contract provides a publicly operated demand response wheelchair accessible transit service, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The Rural CTSA provides the Westside Corridor Service to Kerman and Fresno. The Westside Corridor Service is a wheelchair equipped service offered weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.29 There are currently very few bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the City of San Joaquin. There are

14.7 miles of sidewalks and two miles of bikeways within the City. There is a Class II Bike Lane on Main Street immediately southwest of the Project site. Another 1.9 miles of sidewalk and 5.9 miles of bike paths are planned for the City of San Joaquin in the 2024 Fresno County Regional Active Transportation Plan.30 Additionally, the City requires all new developments to provide sidewalks and crosswalks, where needed.

RESPONSES
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section XIV, the Project includes the addition of up to 176 new residents. This additional number of people is not expected to disrupt or impede existing or planned bicycle or pedestrian services. The proposed Project would not require any changes to existing transportation systems and would have no impact on any plans, ordinances, or policies related to the effectiveness or performance of transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The Project would comply with all applicable City development standards. Any impacts are considered less than significant..

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
29 City of San Joaquin General Plan, July 2014. Transportation and Circulation, Page 5-4 and -5. 30 Fresno County Regional Active Transportation Plan. Page 14-8. chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.fresnocog.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/14_FresnoRegATPReport_SanJoaquin.pdf. Accessed August 2024. 119
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 76
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less Than Significant Impact. Senate Bill (SB) 743 requires that relevant CEQA analysis of transportation impacts be conducted using a metric known as vehicle miles traveled (VMT) instead of Level of Service (LOS). VMT measures how much actual auto travel (additional miles driven) a proposed project would create on California roads. If the project adds excessive car travel onto our roads, the project may cause a significant transportation impact.

The State CEQA Guidelines were amended to implement SB 743, by adding Section 15064.3. Among its provisions, Section 15064.3 confirms that, except with respect to transportation projects, a project’s effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant environmental impact. Therefore, LOS measures of impacts on traffic facilities is no longer a relevant CEQA criteria for transportation impacts.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)(4) states that “[a] lead agency has discretion to evaluate a project’s vehicle miles traveled, including whether to express the change in absolute terms, per capita, per household or in any other measure. A lead agency may use models to estimate a project’s vehicle miles traveled, and may revise those estimates to reflect professional judgment based on substantial evidence.

Any assumptions used to estimate used to estimate vehicle miles traveled and any revision to model outputs should be documented and explained in the environmental document prepared for the project.

The standard of adequacy in Section 15151 shall apply to the analysis described in this section.” VMT significant screening criteria are outlined in the Fresno COG SB 743 Regional Guidelines31 and a project is considered less than significant if it meets a series of criteria, including being considered a ‘low trip generator’, which means generating less than 500 daily trips. In evaluating traffic generation for the project, using the CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.26, the proposed Project in this area would generate 415 weekday trips, with 9.55 trips per unit on Saturdays and 8.55 trips per unit on Sundays. Since the proposed Project would generate less than 500 daily trips, it is considered a ‘low trip generator’ and would have less than significant impacts in regards to VMT.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
31 Fresno Council of Governments. Fresno County SB 743 Implementation Regional Guidelines. July 2020. chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://fresnocog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Fresno-COG-VMTReport-1.pdf. Accessed August 2024. 120
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 77
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project has been designed for ease of access, adequate circulation/movement, and is typical of residential developments in the City of San Joaquin. On-site circulation patterns do not involve high speeds, sharp curves or dangerous intersections. Although there would be an increase in the volume of vehicles accessing the site and surrounding areas, the proposed Project would not present a substantial increase in hazards. Any impacts are considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project does not involve a change to any emergency response plan. As currently planned, access to and from the Project site would be from two points along Main Street, by connecting to the internal roads Sanders and Christopher streets that are connected by 11th Street to form a U-shaped internal circulation pattern and from Arizona Avenue connecting to Main Street. All roads are to be built to City standards. Therefore, the site would remain accessible to emergency vehicles of all sizes. As such, potential impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
121
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 78
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code section
21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of
the landscape, sacred place, or object with
cultural value to a California Native
American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
ii. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of the Public
Resources Code section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.
122
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 79
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study

RESPONSES
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i)Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Less Than Significant Impact. In accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18, potentially affected Tribes were formally notified of this Project and were given the opportunity to request consultation on the Project. The City contacted the Native American Heritage Commission, requesting a contact list of applicable Native American Tribes, which was provided to the City. On September 23, 2024, the City provided letters to the tribes below notifying them of the Project and requesting consultation, if desired.
• Amah Mutsun Tribal Band
• Kitanemuk & Yowlumne Tejon Indians
• Northern Valley Yokut / Ohlone Tribe
• Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe
• Table Mountain Rancheria
• Tule River Indian Tribe
• Wuksachi Indian Tribe / Eshom Valley Band
The City has not received any responses from the tribes contacted as of publication of this document; however, should Tribal Consultation be requested during the review time allotted, the City will accommodate such requests. This is a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
123
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 80
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
c. Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project’s
projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the attainment of solid
waste reduction goals?
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
124
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 81
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of San Joaquin provides water, wastewater, stormwater drainage and contracts with a refuse collector to serve its residents. San Joaquin’s water supply consists entirely of groundwater and no water is purchased from other sources or purveyors. The groundwater supply serves all users within the City, including residential, commercial, and industrial uses. The City’s wells and water distribution system were constructed in 1920, upon City incorporation. Much of this original system exists in the older parts of town; however, the infrastructure in the proposed Project vicinity has been replaced within the last decade.

The City owns and operates a sewage wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) located on the south side of Manning Avenue, just east of the Fresno Slough. The WWTP provides primary and secondary treatment of wastewater. Existing stormwater drainage lines consist of lines along Main Street to the west of the City and along Colorado Avenue to the irrigation ditches north and west of the City limits.

Refuse collection for the City is provided by a private carrier under contract with the City. The American Avenue Landfill, owned and operated by Fresno County, is located just over five miles northeast of the City on American Avenue and serves San Joaquin as well as surrounding communities and incorporated areas.

Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) provides gas and electricity to the City of San Joaquin.

RESPONSES
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within the service territory of the City of San Joaquin and is currently designated for urban development in the City of San Joaquin General Plan. Operational discharge flows treated at the City’s WWTP would be required to comply with applicable water discharge requirements issued by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Compliance with conditions or permit requirements established by the City as well as water discharge requirements outlined by the Central Valley RWQCB would ensure that wastewater discharges coming from the proposed Project site and treated by the WWTP system would not exceed applicable Central Valley RWQCB wastewater treatment requirements.

As discussed in Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality, with an increase in the area of impervious surfaces on the Project site, an increase in the amount of storm water runoff is anticipated. The site would 125
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 82
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
be designed so that storm water is collected and deposited in the City’s existing California Avenue Basin, which has been designed to accommodate site development. Storm water during construction would be managed as part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the SWPPP is retained on-site during construction. Thus, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
Less Than Significant Impact. Water service would be provided to the Project by the City of San Joaquin.

The City of San Joaquin’s water system includes three active water wells (two running and one inactive) that have a theoretical pumping capacity of 3,500 gallons per minute. Well No. 3 at the City Corporation Yard (built in 1968), Well No. 4 at Main and California Streets (built in 1978) and Well No. 5 at Cherry Lane (built in 2006) supply water through the water distribution lines. The City has no water storage capacity. The City’s Water Master Plan includes a total of six wells at build-out of the General Plan.32 The City anticipates that its sources of supplies would be available to meet demands on a consistent basis for all year types, as the site is within the adopted Sphere of Influence and has been included in the City’s infrastructure planning documentation. The proposed development would be required to follow the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinances which include land use goals, policies, and implementation measures for developments regarding water use. The Project developer would also be required to pay the City of San Joaquin’s water system impact fees. Funds accrued under this fee are used to make capital improvements to the City’s water system, including conservation improvements, additional well construction and water storage facilities. Impacts are less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would result in wastewater from residential units that would be discharged into the City’s existing wastewater treatment system. The wastewater would 32 City of San Joaquin General Plan, Setting – 2.2.2. Page 2-5. https://cityofsanjoaquin.org/home/general-plan/. Accessed August 2024. 126
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 83
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
be typical of other residential developments consisting of bathrooms, kitchen drains, and other similar features. The Project would not discharge any unusual or atypical wastewater that would violate the City’s waste discharge requirements.

Additionally, a Sewer Capacity Assessment for the City of San Joaquin was prepared in 2021 which demonstrates that the City can support an additional 754 dwelling units without any upgrades to the existing wastewater treatment facility. The City Manager confirmed that the 2021 conditions have not changed, and the City does have capacity for 44 additional housing units.33 Therefore, assuming compliance with applicable standards and payment of required impact fees and connection charges, the Project would not result in a significant impact related to construction or expansions of existing wastewater treatment facilities. The impact of the Project on wastewater treatment is less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Impact. The City of San Joaquin, through a private contractor, provides weekly curbside solid waste collection services to all households, businesses, and industries within City limits.

Solid waste is taken to the American Avenue Disposal Site, which is operated by Fresno County.34 The American Avenue Disposal Site is permitted to receive up to 2,200 tons of waste per day and has an estimated lifespan to the Year 2031. Per-capita disposal rates in the City are approximately 2.8 pounds per person per day.35 As discussed in Section XIV, Population and Housing, Project development would increase the population by 16 people over what has been planned for in the General Plan. This would account for an additional 44.8 pounds (2.8 pounds per person per day x 16 people) of solid waste per day to be added to the landfill. This unplanned increase of solid waste is minor in nature and can be accommodated by the American Waste Disposal Site. Furthermore, the proposed Project would be required to comply with all standards related to solid waste diversion, reduction, and recycling during 33 Email Communication with Elizabeth Cabrera on 8/21/2024. 34 Landfill Operations, Fresno County. https://www.fresnocountyca.gov/Departments/Public-Works-and-Planning/divisions-of-public-worksand-planning/resources-and-parks-division/landfill-operations. Accessed August 2024. e City of San Joaquin General Plan Update and SOI Expansion Draft EIR. Page 3.17-7. chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://cityofsanjoaquin.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Draft-EIR-Complete.pdf. Accessed August 2024.
127
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 84
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Project construction and operation. The Project is not expected to generate an excess of solid waste beyond what is considered typical of residential land uses. The proposed Project would comply with all federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. As such, any impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
128
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 85
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XX. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility
areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power
lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the environment?
d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of San Joaquin’s planning area is composed of urbanized portions of land and the surrounding agricultural fields. CAL FIRE provides fire protection for the City with a station located in the community of Tranquillity, approximately four miles northwest of the City. Average response time is 13.9 minutes. 129
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 86
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Structures within the City generally receive a rating of six on the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Fire Protection Rating Scale.36
The proposed Project site’s elevation is approximately 170 feet above sea level in an area of intense urban and agricultural development. Surrounding the proposed Project are Main Street, agricultural fields, and single-family residences to the north; Arizona Avenue, walnut orchards and single-family residences to the south; walnut orchards to the east; and single-family residences to the west.

RESPONSES
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact. The proposed Project site is approximately 16 miles northeast of the nearest State Responsibility Area (foothill area west of Interstate 5)37 and over 20 miles northeast of the nearest LRA Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (foothill area west of Interstate 5).38 The relatively flat Project site lies on the Valley floor and is surrounded by active agriculture and residential development. There are no forested areas, extensive grasslands, or heavily wooded areas on or near the Project site.

No roadway design features associated with this proposed Project would result in an impairment of an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan. The City has reviewed the site layout and determined that the Project provides adequate emergency access.
36 City of San Joaquin General Plan, July 2014. Setting, Page 2-8. 37 California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection. State Responsibility Area Viewer. e. Accessed August 2024. 38 CALFIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones. https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire-hazardseverity-zones. Accessed August 2024. 130
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 87
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Impacts associated with Project development would have no impact related to wildfires given the distance the proposed Project is from the closest State Responsibility Area and State Very High Fire Hazards Severity Zone and the intervening land uses between them.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
131
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 88
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF

SIGNIFICANCE
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?

RESPONSES
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of 132
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 89
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. The analyses contained in Section IV, Biological Resources and Section V, Cultural Resources indicates that the proposed Project is not expected to have a substantial impact on the environment or on any resources identified in the Initial Study.

The biological analysis indicated that there is no potential for special status species to exist in the area, there are no wetlands, riparian or sensitive communities in the Project area, and mitigation measure BIO1 is included to reduce potential impacts to protected nesting birds to less than significant. The analysis also found that there are no recorded cultural resources within the Project area that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, for the California State Historic Landmarks. Mitigation measures CUL-1 and GEO-1 are included to protect potential subsurface cultural, archaeological and paleontological resources, which would reduce any impacts to less than significant. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
Less Than Significant Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(i) states that a Lead Agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact of a project is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable. The assessment of the significance of the cumulative effects of a project must, therefore, be conducted in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects.

The proposed Project’s impacts would be individually limited and not cumulatively considerable due to the site-specific nature of the potential impacts. The potentially significant impacts that can be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of recommended mitigation measures include the topics of Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Hazards and Hazardous Materials. These impacts would primarily be related to construction-period activities, would be temporary in nature, and would not substantially contribute to any potential cumulative impacts associated with these topics. Implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1, CUL-1, GEO-1 and HAZ-1, would ensure that the impacts of the project would be below established thresholds of significance. Since the proposed Project would not result in any significant project-level impacts, the proposed Project would not result in any significant impacts that would combine with the impacts of other cumulative 133
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 90
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
projects to result in a cumulatively considerable impact on the environment as a result of Project development. As such, this impact would be less than significant. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. The proposed Project’s potential to result in environmental effects that could directly or indirectly impacts human beings have been evaluated in this Initial Study. Implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1, CUL-1, GEO-1 and HAZ-1 would ensure that the impacts of the Project would be below established thresholds of significance. Since the proposed Project would not result in any significant project-level impacts and with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, all environmental effects that could adversely affect human beings directly or indirectly would be less than significant.
134
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 91
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study

LIST OF PREPARERS
Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
• Emily Bowen, LEED AP, Principal Environmental Planner • Travis Crawford, AICP, Principal Environmental Planner • Caroline Gibbons, Assistant Planner
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
• Amanda Duval, Environmental Scientist
• Walt Hamann ( PG, CEG, CHG), Vice President of Environmental Services • Alana Garza, Associate Biologist
• David Daitch (Ph.D.), Program Manager/Senior Biologist • Courtney Montgomery (BA), Archaeologist
• Kyle Knabb (Ph.D., RPA), Senior Archaeologist
• Chistopher Duran (M.A., RPA), Principal/Senior Archaeologist Persons and Agencies Consulted
City of San Joaquin
• Eric VonBerg, Contract City Planner
135
CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN | Crawford & Bowen 92
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been formulated based upon the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the City of San Joaquin’s Main Street Townhomes Project (proposed Project). The MMRP lists mitigation measures recommended in the IS/MND for the proposed Project and identifies monitoring and reporting requirements as well as conditions recommended by responsible agencies who commented on the project.

The first column of the Table identifies the mitigation measure. The second column, entitled “Party Responsible for Implementing Mitigation,” names the party responsible for carrying out the required action. The third column, “Implementation Timing,” identifies the time the mitigation measure should be initiated. The fourth column, “Party Responsible for Monitoring,” names the party ultimately responsible for ensuring that the mitigation measure is implemented.

The last column will be used by the City to ensure that individual mitigation measures have been monitored.
136
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
Protect Nesting Birds
BIO-1: To the extent practicable, construction shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season, which extends from February through August. If it is not possible to schedule construction between September and January, preconstruction surveys for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that no active nests would be disturbed during the implementation of the Project. A preconstruction survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of construction activities. During this survey, the qualified biologist shall inspect all potential nest substrates in and immediately adjacent to the impact areas. If an active nest is found close enough to the
construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the qualified biologist shall determine the extent of a
construction-free buffer to be established around the nest.

If work cannot proceed without disturbing the nesting birds, work may need to be halted or redirected to other areas until nesting and fledging are completed or the nest has otherwise failed for non-construction related reasons.

Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of San
Joaquin
Cultural Resources Protection Measures
CUL-1: Should evidence of prehistoric archeological
resources be discovered during construction, the contractor shall halt all work within 25 feet of the find and the resource shall be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If evidence of any archaeological, cultural, and/or historical deposits is Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant
137
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
found, hand excavation and/or mechanical excavation
shall proceed to evaluate the deposits for determination of significance as defined by the CEQA guidelines. The
archaeologist shall submit reports, to the satisfaction of the City of San Joaquin, describing the testing program and subsequent results. These reports shall identify any program mitigation that the project proponent shall complete in order to mitigate archaeological impacts (including
resource recovery and/or avoidance testing and analysis, removal, reburial, and curation of archaeological
resources).

GEO – 1: In the event of a fossil discovery by construction personnel, the construction contractor shall halt all
construction activities within the immediate vicinity of the fossil, and a Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall be retained to evaluate the find prior to resuming construction activity. If it is determined the fossil(s) is (are) scientifically significant, the Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall complete the following conditions to mitigate impacts to significant fossil resources:
• If fossils are discovered, the Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall have the authority to halt or
temporarily divert construction equipment within
50 feet of the find until the Qualified Professional
Paleontologist evaluate the discovery and
determine if the fossil may be considered
significant. Bulk matrix sampling may be
necessary to recover small invertebrates or
microvertebrates from within paleontologically
sensitive deposits.
• Once salvaged, significant fossils shall be
identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level,
prepared to a curation-ready condition, and
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant
138
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
curated in a scientific institution with a permanent
paleontological collection along with all pertinent
field notes, photos, data, and maps. Fossils of
undetermined significance at the time of
collection may also warrant curation at the
discretion of the Qualified Professional
Paleontologist.
• The Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall
submit a report describing the results of the
paleontological monitoring efforts associated
with the paleontological monitoring efforts
associated with the project. The report shall
include a summary of the field and laboratory
methods, an overview of the project geology and
paleontology, a list of taxa recovered (if any), an
analysis of fossils recovered (if any) and their
scientific significance, and recommendations.

The report shall be submitted to the City for review
and approval.

Hazardous Materials Reduction Measures
HAZ-1: Soil sampling, per California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural properties (August 7, 2008) shall be conducted to identify the amounts of OCPs in the soil. If present, OCPs requiring further analysis, per DTSC consultation, are
dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane, toxaphene, and dieldrin.

Should these OCPs be present, soil remediation shall be conducted until levels are reduced per DTSC guidelines
prior to issuance of grading permits. Additionally, if any level of arsenic is present, further analysis and sampling shall meet Human Health Risk Assessment NOTE NUMBER 3, DTSC-SLs
Project
Applicant
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits
City of San
Joaquin
139
Main Street Townhomes Project | Initial Study
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
approved thresholds. If arsenic levels do not meet the
approved thresholds, remedial action shall take place to reduce levels below thresholds prior to issuance of grading permits.
140
Exhibit B
Tentative Tract Map No. 6456
141
142
-
·so
L
[L
<(
I j. '
- ,,-,
,'.:;~
" C',i /:;
ffi lVP NUMBER /NO/CA TES KEYNOTE REFERENCE
-1:1 - ,,_:--tt-i.--k-.'"-,-,..:.1--1 -- .~·r,=rtl l - - - - i - T - - - ·7 II l.5"W-tt,.==--1-, - . I
I II l'--4"S SCO : I e::; I I 1~4•5++-11>->""CO"--'"
ll I ,.s·w-tt-Mtw;;;;--+; ~--,--,-------------. I _>.I Ell i I t 1:: e J/)/JT 13 II I r t--STAMPED ,t COi.OREO CONCRETF I FOR PARCEL OEl/NEA TIO/I BE~ I ORIVEWA IS TYPICAL FOR All

I D/JPLEXES
._1••1~ , ~-----t--+---t-----,1
~I : 19 12 I
~, e , m :::vJ/)//wT";: 1 i==t,,tJEM~l-1 I
' 1 ,.s·w-tt-Mtw=--;-1 ~----------- .
-:-r sco I I
- '- I'-- 4 "S
i"' I r--4•) 1•.,-co__,j:---------------+------------,1 "'U1 i
> I ~,: --£11~11--2-0---~
~-- _I _l _____ - _____ IIJ
' I
I !
n :
.

I
' '
u:

I !
' I
I 1
~i

TYPICAL LOT SERVICE LAYOUT
\J!!!_J BOTTOM NUMBER /NO/CA TES SHEET NUMBER I'll/ERE REfEIIENCEO IS MADE SCALE- I" = 20' NOTES
I. Sill" ADDRESS.- NONE
2 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 033-040-50S

3. CURRENT ZONING: SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENT/AL (R-1)

4. CURRENT LANO USE: VACANT

5. PROPOSED ZONING: S/NCLE-FAMIL Y
RESIDENT/AL (R-1)

6. PROPOSED LANO USE: SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENT/AL

7. PROPOSED (3) CONSTRUCT/ON PHASES

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS I THROUGH 48 INCLUSIVE OF BLOCK 51 OF

SAN JOAQUIN IN THE CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN,
COUNTY OF FRESNO, STA ll" OF CALIFORNIA,

ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF FILED IN
BOOK 7 OF PLATS AT PACE 83, F.C.R. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION THEREOF

L YING WITHIN WASH/NC TON A VENUE, ARIZONA
A VENUE, ELEVENTH STREET ANO MAIN STREET.
-----
(E)PP AND OE NORTH TO REMAIN
(E)TREE ROW
---
(E}TREE _R_OW __
(E)TREE ROW

RECORD OWNER
ll"RRA FIRMA DEVELOPMENT, LL C
2037 WEST BULLARD A VENUE SU/ll" /342
FRESNO, CA 93704

FLOOD ZONE NOTE

ACCORD/NC TO THE NA T/ONAL FLOOD INSURANCE
RA ll" MAP FOR FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AND INCORPORA /l"O AREAS, COMMUNITY PANEL
NO. 065029 2550 H, MAP NUMBER
06019C2550H, DA /l"O FEBRUARY 18, 2009, THIS

PROPERTY LIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF FLOOD
ZONE X, AN AREA OE/l"RMINEO TO BE OUTSIDE
THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.
30 I
GRAPl-llC SCALE
6 I
INCH• 30 FEET
30 I
>---+--+------,i'~r----11

WEST SO
_
U~H AVENUE

LOCATION MAP

NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
-----SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY
-----PROPOSED LOT LINE BY THIS MAP
--------- PROPOSED EASEMENT
------ SAWCUT

NO DIRECT ACCESS
--J/)/JT-- PROPOSED JOINT ORY UTILITIES TRENCH
--B"W-- PROPOSED WA ll"R LINE & SIZE
--s"S-- PROPOSED SEWER LINE & SIZE
--,a·so-- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE & SIZE
-2,·so--- DOST/NC STORM DRAIN LINE & SIZE
-,-s--- EXIST/NC SANITARY SEWER LINE & SIZE
-,-w--- EXIST/NC WA/l"R LINE & SIZE
- '' ---(E) PCE POLE LINE TO BE UNOERCRO.
- uc ---(E} PCE UNOERCRO. ELECTRIC MAIN
- - - - - - FIRE LANE CURBS PAIN/l"O RED
.. , ®
®
DMH
...
.w
0 /lflo
0sco
.SMH
,IM

EXIST/NC SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

EXIST/NC STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT
PROPOSED I. 5" WA ll"R ME/l"R
PROPOSED WA/l"R BLOW OFF

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

PROPOSED ELECTRICAL METER
PROPOSED GAS ME/l"R
... PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CURB INLET

PROPOSED STREET LICHT
2· HMA OVERLAY ON (E) PAVEMENT GRIND
TAPER AT CUT/l"R LIP EDGE

FLOOR AREA RATIO FAR)

LDT BUILDING' FAR
1 4,695 SF. 1,860 SF. 39%
2 4.575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40%
3 4.575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40%
4 4.575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40%
5 4.575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40%
6 4.576 SF. 1,860 SF. 40%
7 4.575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40%
8 4.572 SF. 1,860 SF. 40%
9 4.704 SF. 1,860 SF. 39%
10 4.517 SF. 1,860 SF. 41%
11 4.515 SF. 1,860 SF. 41%
12 4.515 SF. 1,860 SF. 41% 13 4.515 SF. 1,860 SF. 41% 14 4.515 SF. 1,860 SF. 41% 15 4,694 SF. 1,860 SF. 39% 16 4,694 SF. 1,860 SF. 39%
17 4,515 SF. 1,860 SF. 41% 18 4,515 SF. 1,860 SF. 41%
19 4,515 SF. 1,860 SF. 41%
2D 4,515 SF. 1,860 SF. 41% 21 4,515 SF. 1,860 SF. 41%
22 4,701 SF. 1,860 SF. 39% 23 4,578 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 24 4,575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 25 4,575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 26 4,575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 27 4,575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 28 4,575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 29 4,575 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 3D 4,689 SF. 1,860 SF. 39% 31 4,662 SF. 1,860 SF. 39%
32 4,542 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 33 4,542 SF. 1,860 SF. 40%
34 4,542 SF. 1,860 SF. 40%
35 4,542 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 36 4,542 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 37 4,542 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 38 4,541 SF. 1,860 SF. 40% 'BUILDING SQ. FT. INCLUDES GARAGE

KEYNOTES
0 ® ®
PROPOSED CURB & CUT/l"R ANO SIDEWALK PER

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN STANDARDS
PROPOSED CURB & CUT/l"R PER CITY OF SAN

JOAQUIN STANDARDS
PROPOSED WEDGE CURB W/GUT/l"R ANO SIDEWALK
AT DRIVE APPROACHES PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2
PROPOSED 6' BLOCK WALL PER CITY OF SAN

JOAQUIN STANDARDS

PCE OVERHEAD POLE LINE TO BE PLACED

UNDERGROUND WITH PHASE II DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED 6' WOOD FENCE PER CITY STANDARDS PROVIDE 2" HMA OVERLAY ON (E} PAVEMENT CR/NO TAPER AT CUT/l"R LIP EDGE
1/
JOB# 25-801
DRAWN BY,D.G.MEll

CHECKED BY, DGM
SCALE, r = 30'
DAT£, 08/26/22
DWG # 22-06BTTM

FIELD BOOK, XX
D4TE OF Sl/llVEY, XX
lAST /i£VfSED,OJ/Ol/25 ,IX1,f
SHEET 1 OF 2
143
SOUTH
R/W
NORTH
R/W
I----------JO'---------+-~--------J0'-----------1
---10'----------20'-------+-~------20'-------~--10' ----1 1/'1~ 1:\ L l,M:_ -41____.~~~~-
(E) CURB, GUTTER ANO/ L '.

SIDEWALK PER CITY STD. P-4
' '
- i,i~~i.o". ,
/.5%

CONSTRUCT CURB IV/GUTTER & SIDEWALK PER
CITY STD. P-4.
2" HMA OIERLA Y ON (E) PVMT. j--1 ~. '
. C AGGREGATE BASE WEDGE CURB IV/CUTTER PER DETAIL HEREON TO BE CONSTRUCTllJ AT DR/1£ APPROACHES ONL r.

R/W
12• COAIPACTllJ NA TIIE SUBGRADE CLAZ II
TO 90% RELATIIE COMP. ASTM 01557-78
TYPICAL 60' R/W SECTION

ARIZONA STREET

NOT TO SCALE
R~ TJ~
R/W
i-----------26.5'----------t----------26.5'----------i
r<---75' ---+------- 19' -------+------- 19' -------~-- 7.5' __ ...., AC PAIEI.IENT

5.5'1
2% SLOP[
_ t.5%
'
CITY STD CURB W/GUTTER ANO 5' SIDEWAU(
~OGE CURB IV/GUTTER AND 4.5' SIDEWALK
PER OETAIL HEREON TO BE CONSTRUCTllJ AT
OR/IE APPROACHES ONL r
[
AGGREGATE BASE CL-:;; 11-
CITY STD CURB IV/GUTTER ANO 5' SIDEWALK.

IITT!GE CURB W/CUTTER ANO 4.5' SIDEWALK
PER DETAIL HEREON TO BE CONSTRUCTllJ AT
DR/1£ APPROACHES ONLY.

NW
R/W

COAIPACTEO NAT/IE SIJBGRAOE TO
95% RELATIIE COMP ASTM 01557-78
6' SANO OR AG BASE CL II UNDER
ALL CO/IC STREET /1./PROvcMENTS
PROPOSED 53' STREET SECTION

NOT TO SCALE
SE
R/W
1----------25.5'----------i--------23.5'----------lfH
AG FIE_D
1----6.5'--~-------19'-----+------- 19'-----+-- 4,5'

CONSTRUCT CURB, GUTTER ANO
SIDEWALK PER CITY STD P-4
R/W

1.5%
j j_ f,;, J 0• o •
LS
CONSTRUCT 6' WOOD FENCE
W/MlL TRcLLIS FOR !ANES
TO ,,-90% =ac@ RELA T/1£ ~=-=-=-r COMP. ASTM 01557-78
-"'•rtr7~•J]• -E·. ' . '----~'STRUCT CURB IV/CUTTER
- PER CITY STD. P-4
6" AGGREGATE BASE

CLASS II
TYPICAL 49' R/W SECTION
11 TH STREET

NOT TO SCALE
R~ T.I.~
R/W
----------so'---------~-----------so·-------------"'
ffi TOP NUI.IBER /NO/CA TES KEY/10 TE REFERENCE
t----~V,c:~/ilc"YE.~S'.----+------34'-----+~---/6'·---->-II 77'-3!' '-
1---~VA~/il~YES~_....,
1:\ 5.5'j

1.5%
-8- 1£.i,,,.,:• ·;' J-- CONSTRUCT CURB W/GUTTER & SIDEWALK PER CITY STD. P-4 6" AGGREGATE BASE /2' COI.IPACTllJ NA TIIE SUBGRADE CLAZ II
TO 90% RELAT/1£ COi.iP. ASTM 01557-78

MAIN STREET

NOT TO SCALE
\Jt!.) BOTTOM NUMBER /NO/CA TES SHEU NUMBER WI/ERE REFERENCEO IS MAO[ PROPOSED 6' BLOCK WALL PER

CITY DF SAN JOAQUIN STANDARDS
CD
~DC£ CURB WITH CUTTER

SEE DETAIL HEREON

SIDEWALK TRANSITION TO DRIVE APPROACH
N. T.S
1- ----------3' -o" -------- 1
ROLL

CURB AND GUTTER
---------------s'-o"-----------------1
--------- 5' - 0" -----------+--1 '- Q'c,,' -----2' - 0"---i _L 1.5%(1% to 2%
4"
.. , ..
-~ .•. , ., .• ,.

T
:._-
6" 12" C-C --- Typ
ROLL

CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK
NOTES:
[j] 1 /2" x 24" rebar, greased and wrapped one side through al l expansion and cold joints.
12] Extend to face of wall if applicable

3. Access curb ramps, sidewalks and improvements in the ADA path of travel shall be constructed in conformance with th e Federal Americans wit h Disabilities Act, California Title 24, and these Sta ndards.
/v!A/N STREET
N4/'0/'00''E: 630.25'
Tnnnn
UU_l__l_J_ 1-lJlJULJ
s41v1·oo·w 630.25•
If 111111111 Tl Tl Tl Tl fl

SITE BOUNDARY - RECORD PLAT LINES

TTM - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

GENERA/
,I, .ALL MIMMUM CO!vDiriONS or SUBD/115/GN APFPOv/.L /,~I TtfE CiTY OF SAN JOAOWN SUBU!VlSION CiRO/NIINCE / 1RE ftVCWOED BY REFERD\/CE.

0. l.
6 I
e. D.
.1/// /NA(,'/ UA.P Si/All f,'()1!11--'i Y /1/!i// I.if fF0-1.7.',!0NS ()/ .ti.'/ .','I.I/J/).IVl.',rJN MAI-' A'','!_ .APPii'Gt~L OF THE .TENTATIVE MAP iS SUBJECT .T'J /JLL REOUIRED CAL!FGPMA ENVlR'JlvMENFt1L Qi.//1Urt 11:::I STUDIES ,1/'ID r::CPHESPONDiNG MfTIG!WON MDISU/?£5 ,15 _!Ji i!NM/Ni/J IIY /.Iii (,'//Y 1-'/Ail//Vlk
PRIOR .TtJ APPii'GVAL OF THE fiNAL MAP AND RECOHDING THH?EOF, APPLICANT SHALL:

CONSTRUr::r 11Ll PUBLIC ,'l.fPHQVEMENTS OR PRDf1DE THE REOUiRED SUHET.V FOR ,Ti-(£ C(JNS/ii/Jr,'.1//JN iiilNIOI ION A(,'l'l!-'iANCi iiY ii// CiiY {,'OUN{,;'l .ALL NECESSJ.RY OED/CA T!ONS FOR R/CHTS OF rl:.4 Y /.NO EA5£M£i\/,TS SHALL BE PRQl10£0 ro ,THE CiTY OF 5/'i\/ PUB!.../C UT!UTY r::CMP,1M£5, ,1NO OTHER ,1FFECT£D /,GENC/£5. _µi-1/0N 11) A!-'f'Nf/VAI ()/ f.l_lJ JllvAl MAI-: lMfHOV/Ml/v'/ _µi.LIVS ION SIMI IS 1/f.l//lil \ ORA/NACE FAC/U.TiES, SURI£'( MONW1ENTS, CHAD,WC, EROSION CONT.RD!_, AND OTHER ,f?£0Wi?ED iMPPOvEMEi\/TS SH/LL BE' Si./BMirTED FDR T.f.fE CITY ENGiNEEP'S ,1PPROVi1L. _µi/lli!C ,'Mf'N/Jt1tiflNiS .si.lA/i (,'1)1\//0NM /0 /II/ ill/SI //}//l()N (JI /Iii ,':1/IY (JI SAN ,)OAOU,W 1MP!rOVDJENT STANDARDS ANU ANY MODIFICA T/ONS rHERETO APPRQ 1/ED BY Th'E CITY ENG/NEEF: IN PL/CE /IT .TH£ ,T,1/,1E O,~ CONSTRUC,T,'ON. iMP,f?CVEME'NTS SH/,LL CONF'JRM .1,';! 1)1.ll/ll (,/'lY A/)()f'/il} l)OU!Mi/1/IS' .1/1/U/J/)IN(,' !Iii (,'/NINA/ Pih'v; 11/Ai/N MAS/IN f-'/AIJ, 5EWEP MASTER PLJJ1\/ AND STORM WArt7? ,MASTER PLAN rHE WORK SHALL COMPL y 111TH !,LL /lff'UCIIBLE 5Ti1rt~ F[D£H,1L, ,1NO lCC:1L l/1/115 ./1/i/D REGUU,TIONS. .A ',D!lS l.'if'nki Pidi--'ANli) i.lY A CAlliONMA /,'/f,/S/l!d/J (;!()i/{,;rl/v!CAI il./1,/NilN SI/Ail 8£ SUBMITTED TO .THE C/TY £NCW£E/? J.S FAR.T OF THE /MPROVEMENT PLANS. THE SOILS ,!?£PORT SH/'LL 11/CLUDE HECGMMENO/lliOf\lS FOR THE STRU':.TUR;T,L SEC,70N5 FDR STREETS, .1 XCA VA ii/JN, COMPA(,'/lf)1'v; U I J,id,VG; AN1J 1';/.'U!Jl/11/,/(,' Ni ()l,'ll(i Ml N /.S PRIOR ,T'] APPii'GVAL OF T.HE 1MPROV£MENT PLANS, APPLiCJJNr SHALL PHEPARE A SrGRM /J,;4 TL7i' PCLLUT/(i/'I Pl?[VL~1T1C/I PLAN (5WF:PP) ro,7 ACTIVJT/[S P1/RSUANT T(} .THE CAL/HJRMA WATER RESOURCE'S MEMOR)NDUM, 456 SIXTH STREET• GVSTWE, CALFOR!v'IA 95322 • rELf.7WON£ (209) 854-3300 • FAX {209) 854-36()0 CONTROL BOARU ORD£.!? NO. 2022-0057-DWO, .NPOES NO. CASOOD002. PREPAPE AN ER090N CONTROL PU-JI/ AS PIRT OF .THE IMPROVEMENT PUNS FOR S.T'JRM WATER AND CONSTR!E.T/[iN BMPS APPLICANT SHALL PROV/DE A ~/;DID NUUB£fr PP/OR TC APPROVAL OF THE l~PROVEME/VT P!_ANS.

PRIOR ro APP/?CVAL OF T.1-!E IMPROVEMENT PLANS, APPL/CANr SHALL PREPARE A .P11T-PROJ£CT WA7E9 BALANCE CJJLCLJLATJON FOR STORM I/ATER .Ri../1/0fT PURSULNT TU THE C!iUFORt/f,1 WATER HESCURCES CON,T,9{i(_ BC11RD CPDER NC: 2022-u057-DWO, NPOES NO (,'AS0'7()f}l7J /(Jli (,'OMP/IA/,/Ci Ill!!/ f'()S/-{,'()/1/SiNr!(,'i/f)N '!IAN!)ANI}';' /ON NON-.MS4 PHASE I AND PHASE I,' J,G'ENCiES.
lO. PRIOR .T'J .-1PPHCWIL OF THE !~~PROVEMENT PL,1/'/S, ,1PPL/C/WT SHALL Pl?EPl1f1E ,1 DUS.T CONTROL PL.A/1/ (DCP) ANO F/iE THE PLA/1 mTH TH£ SAN JOAOU!N J/IDIY A/,9 PCLLUT/ON CQf\lTROL OiSTPiCT FOH /'PPROVAL OF CONSTR~1CTiON .ACllVmES FOR THE PROJECT iF /i'LO,'HRLD.
.11. PRIOR ,T'] THE .ISSUANCE OF ANY CRAD!NG AND EiVCRCACHM£NT PERM1rS, APPL/CA/IT SHALL Th'£ PERMir Ff.T, PLAN CHECK AND .li\/SPEC.TiCN FEES. ANU FURNISH /~f,0ROV£ME~1T :.z:cuP/,T,'LS PUl?.:)UAlvI 10 .T//L CITY'S 1~1PHOVD//Lll1 STANDAl?DS, MUN!C/Pli_ CIJiT, ORD1WJ.NCES, ANO CAL/FOR/I.IA SUBDIII/SJON MAP ACT
/2. PRIOR .TO THE /SSUANCE OF A BUILD/NC PE9M/T, APPL/C/'NT SHALL PA ,YAU 0£VEWPMENT .IMPACT ff~5 AS' 5'Fffl,'7f'O AND P{J,f?SUANT TO ,T,'i[ C/TYS MIJN/CIPAL COD( 0/i'DliVANCLS, .A1VIJ RESOLUTICl/5'. TH£ Fff ASSESSMEN.T SHALL /,VClUDE AU APPL/CABL£ FEES F'JR PUBLIC FACILITIES, POL/CE, F/Rt .PROTECTi'Qf\l, STRtETS, WATER, SEWt.7?, STORM D/i'AliVACL, RA1Z1WJD Cf!OS5!NC5 AND PARKS .r!I5 Si/AU DC PAIU AT Tl1L 1/ML 'JF .THE ISSUANCE OF EACH PERMIT.
,1.J. ,T,lfE P.RCP'JSED PARCELS SH)LL BE ANN£X£U TO Tfi£ APPUCABLE ASSESSA1ENT DiSTPiCTS i/1/CU!D!NG, !JUT NOT UMJTLfJ TO_ Tl/L LA/'IDSCAPC AND MA/NTTNANCL Oi5TRICT .A1VIJ COM14UN/TY FACILITIES 0/STR/Cr FOR THE CITY CF SA/'! jCAQu~t,/ FCP ALL REQWRED .AND APPL/CABLE ASSESSMEiVTS, CP, .AT .TH£ CITY'S u/SCRET/01\'. AP.PUCAN,T /f1LL AGl?CL TO rOi?M A NL/I/ DL'11!?/CT /'""0/i' Tl!CSC JSS[SJMLNTS .14. PRm1D£ u'liLJT'I SERVICES re EACH LOT ELECTP/C POI//EP, CAS, TELEPHONt, .AND CABLE .T£Lfl1SiON. CCiNSTRUCT ALL PROPOSED UT/LIT/ES UNDERCRCUNU WJTHftV THE smLcr f?/Cl/TS IJF WAY 'JR Pl_l[!L/C U17U1( LASCMLNT
.I~. .RE.M'J'/E .ALL /),"0Z/TY POLE'S ALC!J,:J THE STREET FRONr,<,,GE OF PROPOSED SUBOMSJON AlvD UlvDEPCROWVD ALL 0/ERHEAD L/,VES ilvCLUDHVC £l£C,T,RICAL, CCiMMUJ\i1/CA170,t AND CABLE rv
.16. .APPLICANT TQ PROVIDE A L.AND5CAP£ BUHTR BETWEEN THE 5.TREE.T S/DE /.NO SUBD/V/5.ICll LOTS AWNC MAI,\' STREU:
.11 CONSTRU'...T A SPL/T-,'A,CL CMU fJLOCK ~WLL ON MAiN STRffT TD LX.TC/,/D T/JC ffNGT/1 {II .THE SUBD/V/SION BOUNDARY.
/8. .APPLICANT SHALL COMPl .Y WITH AU FLOCiO HAZARD REOWREMEiV.TS FOH /'LL 1'v'£Wl Y CRLAILD LOTS PUH5UANT .TIJ ALL APPUCADLL il[GULAT/OlvS AND AS A.PPf!O/CD [iY T!!L CJTY ar- SAN JOAQUIN.
/9. ,T,lfE AND iNST.ALLAT!DN OF MA/LBOXES SHALi_ BE APPPO'/ED BY Tl-It US PCSTMASll.R ANO .T/i[ CITY QF SJ.N JOAOU!!I
20 .THE NAMES FOR T!tt NEW SUBD/1?SION STRtETS ARE SUB,./EC.T TO )PPROVAL BY T.HE CITY OF SAN JDAOU!N.
2t. ,T/i[ LX/S,T,WC AND Pf!OFOSU'J RIC/ITS or ~w y A/ID CAS[MLNTS S/IOW/'! ON 17/C /LNT/' T11/L MAP SHALL BE PREUMII\/ARY UNTIL THE FINAL MAP IS PEVJEWED AND APPRDVtU BY ,TH£ Ci.TY 22 APPLICANT SI/ALL COORD1IIJ TC AND 0[!.TJJN ALL .R[OWRLD APP.RDVJLS ,'/?OM ANY STAKEh'OLDEP AGBVC/ES AFFECTED BY THE WORK 456 SIXTH STREET• CUSTl,\'l:.~ CAL/FORNiA 95322 • TELE0HON£ (209) 854-3300 • FAX {209) 854-36()0 SUB0/1/15/CW PUBUC IMP.RO l1£MEN TS

STREETS
23 DEDICJJE A !0-FT PUBLIC U,"0ZITY/PEDE5TRIAN EA5EU£NT FOR THE SOUTH HJ,LF OF MM/ smEET AND CONSTR~1CT STREU IMPR'Jl/£1,fEN.TS PURSUfNT /(i STANDARDS FOR A WO FT .TYP/CAL ST/r.¥£1 SECTION OR iS APPROl/ff, B:1 TH£ Ci.TY E/'JIJJNEER. ROi0/4t.'AY PAVEMENT 5HAL!_ BE WIDE,VED TO UL,T,'MATE STREET /11DTH fl1TH!"I Ti-I£ PRO£Cr FRON.TJ,GE ANO rRANSIT/'JNED TO EXISTING .PAVEMENT AS REQUIRED. CURB. GU.TTER, SIDEWALK.

LANUSCAP1WG, STREET LlGH,/NG AND OTHER !r.7ECrU/RED ST/r.7EET FP'J/v'TAGE iMPROVHfENTS 5HAL!_ EXTEi\/0 THE LE.1\/GlH OF Th'£ SUBDIV/S/CN BQWIDAPY. CONSTRUCT ALL REQuZ9ED l'RDNTA&Y iMPRGVEMENTS PER CITY STf,NO/'ROS DR AS APP.i?OVEO BY THE CirY ENG/,\l[ER. 24 DEDiCIJE A !0-FT PUBLIC u,r,zrrY/PEDES,T,9/AN £ASEU£NT FOR TH£ £A5.T HALF OF ARIZONA .AVENUE .LNO C:JNSTPUCT STREET .IMPROVEMEiVTS PU/?SUANT TO STANDA,%5 Ff.)R A 6'J FT .TYP/CAL STREET SEC,T,'Of\l OR /5 APPROI/£[, B:/ THE Ci.TY EN:JJNEFR. RO/,OW~Y PAVEMENT SHALL BE J1,7[)£,\'l:.-D 10 Ul,T,'MATE STREET U1D,T,I-I W/THJ,V Tl-It PRO£U FRON.T.~Gt ANO rRANS/1/:JNED TO EJr.7S,77NC .PAVEMENT AS REQUIRED. CU,98 GUTT£/?, AND SiOE/fAU< AND omE'? REQWRED STREE.T FRONT~GE lifl.PPO/EMENTS SWLL £)(TENO TH£ LENGTn' OF TH£ SUBUV!SJON BOUNDAH'r'. CONSTRUCT ALL RECrU/REO FRC/'JTAGE !#PROV£i!£NTS PEP C/TY STANDARDS CR AS JPPRUVED BY THE CITY Ei\/GilvtER. 25 DEDIC,~ .TE STREET .R/CH.T o,r- WA ( ANU PUBUC OliUT.Y~/PEDES,7?Wv' EASEMENT FOR ALL NU/ SUBE/V/5/0N S.T/?£Ers AND CONSTRl)CT STRffT ,'l,1f'RCV£MENTS PURSUANT TO A 53-FT .PROPUS£0 STREU SECTION AS S/-!CWN ON THE MAP GP A5 /PPRCiV£0 BY THE CITY ENCi1/,!E£9. ROf,UW4 Y /MP/?OVEMENTS SHALL 1,VCWOE, BUT NOT BE LIM1l£0 TO, PA VEMEIIT SF...",T/CN, CURB, bVTr£P, S!D£WALl{, CURB RA/11,0 5; ORJ/.EWA _v:,: STREET U'J!-1,INC~ LANUSCAP1~/G, SUR'/EV h/01\/UMEiVTS, 5/GNAGE, AND STRIP/NC AND SHLLL CONFORM .TQ THE CJTYS /MP.ROVEMENT 57/'NOI-.RDS.
26 DEDIC~ .TE STREET HJCH.T OF WA i' ANV PUBL'C UliUTY/PEDES,7?/J,N EASEMENT FOR ALL NEW SUBUV!S/0/1/ S.T,9EETS /IND CONSTRUCT STRffT ,'l.lP/?CVEM£NTS PURSU,1N1 TO 11 3fJ-FT .l'fr:'()/'DSf!J SINJ-1-1 _',H,'l/f_/1\/ A.', _',HOW/\/ Oi\l IHI- MAI' (;f.J A.~· Ji'l'HDVf!J HY /Hf Cl// ROf,UWAY /MPROVEMENTS SHALL liVCWOE, BUT NOT BE L!M1l£0 TO, PAVE1!E/'IT SEC,T,'CiN, CURB, GUTrEP, S1D£W;ILK, CUl?B RIIMPS. DRJ/ITW/1 (5, STREET U'St!T!NC, ,I ANi/,',{,'Ai 11!/t,; SUH '/I- Y l,f()l\([./Mf- N rs: .',i(,/VAM, AN!) S/N11/ 'iN(,' Ai\//) ,SHJJ / COi\lf f)li'M ,I';) /HICJTY-S /MP,i?OVEMENT S.Tlt'1iO.LlrD.

WATER Sl'5T£/,/
J/ C(JNS/h:'U';'.1 WA!f-ir MAftV.S, f-lf'f H/'/)J-<A/Vl.\ tJl()W1Ji-.~_s; SAMl'J.11\/(,' S!Ai!()N'i; A/WJ IA.lfHJi CQ"lil/EC,T,'QNS AS NffESSARY TO SERVE EACf-1 LQl:
28 :1'11TFR SE.RI/ICES SHILL B£ SiZED TO MEE.T O!JM£S,T,1C AND Fl,9£ Pl?Ol£CT!ON DE/,f/JNDS IINU SHA/I iNDIJi/f SJ---/tJJ()l-f VAi VfS; UJNl'f.lh:'A/rJN S/D1/'.S; Alli) WAHN Uf!I-J-6 .~'/JH/)IV!IJfll SHALi_ ,'NCOR.PQRJ,,TE WATER PECiRCULA,70N ,FOR PES/OENT/AL SPR/,~1KL£1? S.YS.TEM AT Th[ :1'11 rm SE.RI/ICE 0,9 !JNS/TE PLUMB11//C /IS ,1PPi_iC,18L£.

J.i.J C(JNS/h:'U';'.1 Ml/1//MUl,f H-/,11/l'H WA If-fr:' MAliVS {j/V 0/Y .(Jih:'f!- /.) A/'li) I ()()J-'f/) AS M-f.l)fl} ID SUPPORT rHE P.'?CPOSED SUBOidSION A/ID .APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. PIPE SIZES GRD1T£1? TH;IN TH£ MJ/1/i'l.lUM SHIIU BE UET£RMl!vtU FROM HYDR,1Ui_iC CIILCUZ/i,'lONS .AND/OR MODEL!,VG STUD1'£S, CONS/STE~IT WITH rHE EX/S,"0WC NErlr'C'RK 'JRIU, GP A5 ,1?£CGMM£NOED FROM Tt!E W/ .TER M/15,TER PLl1N.

30. CONSTRUC.T ANU/GR EXTEND WA .TER MA.INS Ql\f MJ.1N STPEET, S.~ND£R5 5TREE,: 11 TH STREE,: AlvO CHRISTOPHER ST.i?EE.T.
";t. CXTTND ,T,1/L LXIS'Ti/v'C 12-iNC/i WA.TCR MA/N DI/ MAlN 51/r'ffT TIIL LLIVGTII if Tl/!:

SUBUV!SJ0/1/ BCUNUA,9'1.

SE~R Sr5TEI.I
";2. CONSTRU'...T snirn UNCS, Li/7 STATIONS, MJ/'v/J(}LLS, AND LA.T[]].A,L CONNCCT!ONS AS NECESSA/?'r' ro SER'/E EACH LOT CQNVfl' SANITARi' WASTEW4 TER /,7,~ ) CRA ~1T.'I FLOW S (5 .TEM /.J/IL£SS A LJF,T STA Tl!JN iS REQUIRED A I PC/,V rs OF CrJNNEC T!ON out TCi .TOFOGRAPIJY l?[S,T,7/CTIONS. 456 SIXT// smLCT• GUS,T,1/,/C, CAU(Ol?MJ 95J22 • T!:LLPiiUNL (20!J) B54-33u0 • F_J,X (2o:J) 854-360.'J
33 LATERAL CONNEC%NS SHALL 11/ICLUO£ CL£ANOLJTS AND CJT,1-/£.R REOU/PEO CQMP0/1/£N.TS PEF! THE CiTY'S JMPROVDIE/'IT STAIIDAf:DS.

J4. CQf\lSTRUC.T MIMMUM 8-/,~1CH SEWER MAINS ON C/TY STREETS UNLESS APPl?0!/£0 OTHE9'1.?5E' BY THE C1TY E~1G1,VEER PIP£ SIZES GREATER THAN T/1t WNl,tfUM SHALL BE 0£1£Rl,f/,~1ED .FROM /-:IYORAUUC CALCUi_,t, %/'IS /,lvD/tP M0[£UNG STUDIES, CONS/51£\1.T 117TH ,T,1-!E EX/ST,WG NETWOf.'K IJRIU, UP AS REC(»l1/,J£//D£D FROM THE SEWER MAST£P PLAN J5 CQf\lSTRUC.T ANU/7R EXTEND STUER MA/NS ON ivf,L,IN STPE£T, SA!vOERS srREET, AND CHRiSTOPHER STREt7
J6. £,(TEND ,T,1-/£ EX/ST/NG 8-,WCH S£/11£.R MJ./N QI\/ M)1W STf:EET TH£ LENGTf-1 OF Tl-!£ SUBDIV!SiON BCUNDAHV.

ST.ORI.I DRAINAGE
Jl co,vsmucr STOHM DR)1IJ U/£S, M)NHOLES, DRAIN 11/,!LETS, CATCH BAS/,VS, ODE.NT/ON BAS,WS ()UIF.LiLS~ .LNO LJFT STA TIDNS AS NECESSAR .Y FOR COLLE'...'.T,WG AND CONVEYING ,T,lfE STORM RUNO!T FOR THE SUED/VISION
J8 co,vsmucr STOHM SEWE.RS Cl/ C/TY STREETS AS DET£PM1NED FRUM HYDf:AUUC CALC~li_l- T/C/'/5 /ND/GP MODEU/1/C STUD1t5. CONS,151£N.T JtJTH lHE EXl5,T,WC NET'#ORK GR10, OR AS PECOMMENOEO FROM Th'£ STORM UR~IN MASTER PLAN J9. ALL RUNOFF FRCM .THE f'/?Of':JSED CITY SF?EE.TS SMALL 8£ C:JNTAll\/£0 U,,1Tl-l;W THE A 1BL!C .R/Gll.TS OF WAY OR OSFMEVTS /.NO C!JNVEYEO re A 5TORM ORA/,~! BASiN AC,RE£ABL£ TO ,T,lfE CiTY )NO APPLICANT: APPL/CANT SHAU D/SCHARCE STORM RU,VOFF ro THE CIT( BASiW CN NOR THE,t,,Sl CORNER OF C/'UP)RMA A/ID 5.T,lf SH?EET 11A THE EXIS'T,l/1/G lHY

5.TORM SEWE"RS. ~IPGRAD£ THE PIP£ NErWOPK J,/vO STORM BASIN FACIL/.T,1ES )5 R£{)U/R£U ro )CC0/.1MODATE THE ADU!TIONAL 5TQPM w,~ .TER VOLUME FROM rHE PHQJECT SirE OR 0£.M:JNSTPATE THAT THESE FAC,Z/T/£5 HA/£ .THE AD£0UArE CAPAC/TY TO HANDLE THE D{/ST!IVG FLCiWS PLUS PROJECT
I ....

I .. ..... ..... " s :;i
I ..... ~:i
I <ti iii I-. i.;:: e Cl:: ii " t:l !il I .... a.:
v;
....:i µ.l 1/] u ....:i .ii -> .ii E-<
:::s -< µ.l 8 ~' "' ...... ,..___ (,.;. u c; C, 0 :>- i,I.l 1/] c,... ,_-;i, ....:i 1/] 6~
-< -< i-; Q v; -ff:~ Lo i' c'.:
:::, "'-'
it ·<
)li
c; 2:
<ti ~f e ~'° ....:. µ.l :::;;: ''"' Cl:: ?~ µ.l (I \ :z 0 ;-- -·z. "' C Co e; 11 o.' i;i ,<. 1' "'" K a.: 8';' cd_
JOB # 25-801
DRAWN BY,D.G.MELL

CHECKED BY, DGM SCALE,NTS
DATE:, 08/26/22
DWG # 22-068TTM

FIELD BOOK, XX
DATE Or SIJNVE'1' XX
LAST H£VIS£!).· 03/0l/25 •Dal
SHEET 2 Of 2

EXTENDED
LIVING
SPACE
GARAGE
DINING
LIVING
DINING
LIVING

KITCHEN KITCHEN

BEDROOM

BEDROOM
MASTER

BEDROOM
DEN

BEDROOM
MASTER

BEDROOM

EXTENDED
LIVING
SPACE 105.00' 105.00'
43'-0" 43'-0"
43'-0" 43'-0"
GARAGE
144
Exhibit C
Conditions of Approval for TTM No. 6456
Conditions of Approval:

General

1. All minimum conditions of subdivision approval in the City of San Joaquin Subdivision Ordinance are included by reference.

2. The tract map shall comply with all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act.

3. Approval of the Tentative Map is subject to all required California Environmental Quality Act studies and corresponding mitigation measures as determined by the City Planner.

4. The subdivision layout, zoning, density, lot usage and access, and other applicable criteria are subject to the approval by the City Planner.

5. The subdivision ingress/egress is subject to the approval by the County of Fresno Fire Department.

Applicant shall provide underground fire as required and approved by the Fire Department under Permit #10868.

10. A soils report prepared by a California registered geotechnical engineer shall be submitted to the City Engineer as part of the improvement plans. The soils report shall include recommendations for the structural sections for streets, excavation, compaction, clearing, and grubbing requirements.

12. Prior to approval of the improvement plans, Applicant shall prepare a pre-project water balance calculation for storm water runoff pursuant to the California Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2022-0057- DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002 for compliance with Post-Construction Standards for non-MS4 Phase I and Phase II agencies.

18. Provide Center Line Monuments for all street intersections and locations as required by the City standards.

19. Remove all utility poles along the street frontage of proposed subdivision and underground all overhead lines including electrical, communication, and cable tv.

20. Provide a landscape buffer between the street side and subdivision lots along Main Street.

21. Construct a split-face CMU block wall on Main Street to extend the length of the subdivision boundary.

22. Applicant shall comply with all flood hazard requirements for all newly created lots pursuant to all applicable regulations and as approved by the City of San Joaquin.

23. The location and installation of mailboxes shall be approved by the US Postmaster and the City of San Joaquin.

24. The names for the new subdivision streets are subject to approval by the City of San Joaquin.

25. The existing and proposed right of ways and easements shown on the Tentative Map shall be preliminary until the Final Map is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.

26. Applicant shall coordinate and obtain all required approvals from any stakeholder agencies affected by the work.

Subdivision Public Improvements
Streets

Roadway pavement shall be widened to ultimate street width within the project frontage and transitioned to existing pavement as required. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk and other required street frontage improvements shall extend the length of the subdivision boundary. Construct all required frontage improvements per City standards and the Tentative Map or as approved by the City Engineer.

30. Dedicate street right of way and public utility/pedestrian easement for all new subdivision streets and construct street improvements pursuant to a 49-ft Proposed Street Section as shown on the Tentative Map or as approved by the City Engineer. Roadway improvements shall include, but not be limited to, pavement section, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, driveways, street lighting, landscaping, survey monuments, signage, and striping and shall conform to the City’s Improvement Standard and the Tentative Map.

31. Provide street lights on Arizona Avenue as required by the City of San Joaquin.

32. Provide asphalt overlay for Arizona Avenue as shown on the Tentative Map and as approved by the City Engineer.

33. Provide fire lane red painted curbs as shown on the Tentative Map and as approved by the City of San Joaquin.

Water System

34. Construct water mains, fire hydrants, blowoffs, sampling stations, and lateral connections as necessary to serve each lot.

37. Construct and/or extend water mains on Main Street, Veracruz Avenue, Chiapas Avenue, and 11th Street.

38. Extend the existing 12-inch water main on Main Street the length of the subdivision boundary.

39. Provide fire hydrants on Main Street and Arizona Avenue as required by the County of Fresno Fire Department.

Sewer System

40. Construct sewer lines, lift stations, manholes, and lateral connections as necessary to serve each lot.

Convey sanitary wastewater via a gravity flow system unless a lift station is required at points of connection due to topography restrictions.

41. Lateral connections shall include cleanouts and other required components per the City’s Improvement Standards.

42. Construct minimum 8-inch sewer mains on City streets unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer.

Pipe sizes greater than the minimum shall be determined from hydraulic calculations and/or modeling studies, consistent with the existing network grid, or as recommended from the Sewer Master Plan.

43. Construct and/or extend sewer mains on Main Street, Veracruz Avenue, and Chiapas Avenue.

44. Extend the existing 8-inch sewer main on Main Street the length of the subdivision boundary.

Storm Drainage

45. Construct storm drain lines, manholes, drain inlets, catch basins, detention basins, outfalls, and lift stations as necessary for collecting and conveying the storm runoff for the subdivision.

47. All runoff from the proposed City streets shall be contained within the public rights of way or easements and conveyed to a storm drain basin agreeable to the City and Applicant. Applicant shall discharge storm runoff to the City basin on northeast corner of California and 5th Street via the existing City storm sewers.

Applicant shall upgrade the pipe network or demonstrate that these facilities have the adequate capacity to handle the existing flows plus project. Applicant shall be responsible for any required off-site storm basin improvements to accommodate the additional storm water runoff from the project site. 147
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-01

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SAN JOAQUIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS

71.08, 154.004, 154.062 AND 153.071 OF THE SAN JOAQUIN

MUNICIPAL CODE AND APPROVING THE REZONING
OF APN 033-040-50 FROM R-1 ZONE DESIGNATION TO
R-2 ZONE DESIGNATION
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2023, Terra Firma Development LLC (“Applicant”) proposed a rezoning of the Project site from R-1 to R-2 to allow for the subdivision and development of Main Street Townhomes on APN 033-040-50; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes an amendment to the R-2 zone development standards within the San Joaquin Municipal Code (SJMC) to allow for the construction of the duplex units including changes to the definition of a structure, R-2 setback standards, and street and driveway standards; and
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, after consideration of all items before it, including all proposed zoning amendments, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 2025-02 recommending to the City Council the adoption of the IS-MND and the approval of an ordinance for change of zone districts amending the official City of San Joaquin Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-02 included findings as required by SJMC section 154.026; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2025, the City Council of the City of San Joaquin conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project and zone text amendments. At the hearing, all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received and considered the staff report and all the information, evidence, and testimony presented in connection with this Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the Main Street Townhomes IS-MND prior to making a decision on SJMC zone text amendments and rezoning of APN 033-040-50 to R-2; and
WHEREAS, after consideration of all items before it at the public hearing, the City Council now desires to adopt an ordinance to amend the official Zone Map for the proposed rezone of APN 033-040-50.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Joaquin ordains as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds that all of the facts set forth in the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council finds that all legal prerequisites for consideration of this matter have occurred, including the notice of and the holding of a public hearing and the resolution of the Planning Commission.
148
SECTION 3. The City Council finds that public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practices justify the change in zone districts as recommended by the Planning Commission. The changes are also consistent with the purpose of the City’s zoning ordinance to promote the growth of the City in an orderly and sustainable manner and to ensure consistency with the City General Plan.

SECTION 4. CEQA. The City Council finds that it has concurrently considered and approved the Main Street Townhomes IS-MND at the Public Hearing and on file in the City Clerk’s Office.

SECTION 5. Approval of Zoning Text Amendments. The City Council adopts the Zoning Text Amendments as set forth in the attached Exhibit A which is incorporated by reference.

SECTION 6. Approval of Amended Zone Districts. The City Council approves the reclassification of the R-1 zone designation of APN 033-040-50 to an R-2 zone zone designation as set forth in the attached Exhibit B which is incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 7. Severability. If any provision(s) of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 7. Posting. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance by the City Council of the City of San Joaquin and shall cause this ordinance to be published or posted in accordance with Government Code Section 36933 as required by law.

SECTION 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days following its adoption.

The forgoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the San Joaquin City Council on the 3rd Day of June, 2025 and adopted at a regular council meeting of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin the 1st day of July 2025, and passed at said meeting with the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________
Adam Flores-Cornejo, Mayor
City of San Joaquin
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Matt Flood, City Clerk
City of San Joaquin
149
Approved as to Legal Form:

Hilda Cantú Montoy
City Attorney
Exhibit A: SJMC text amendments
Exhibit B: Rezoning Map
150
Exhibit A: SJMC Text Amendments
SECTION 1. The definition for the term “DRIVEWAY” in Section 71.08(E)(2) of the San Joaquin Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:

DRIVEWAY. A poured-in-place asphalt or concrete slab which covers less than 50% of the required front yard area of the lot and is directly connected to a public right-of-way by a curb cut, or any other designated parking area. On corner lots coverage can cover up to 60% of the required lot front yard area.

SECTION 2. The definition for the term “STRUCTURE” in Section 154.004 of the San Joaquin Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:

SECTION 3. Section 154.062 of the San Joaquin Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:

Development Standard Regulation Comments or Special Requirements Maximum Lot Coverage 60 percent
Minimum Lot Size Interior lots: 3,000 square feet
Corner lots: 3,500 square feet
Minimum Lot Dimensions Depth: 75 feet
Width: 40 feet
Exceptions may be made for cul-de-sac and
corner lots or other non-standard
circumstances.

Maximum Building
Height
Main building: 35 feet
Accessory building: 12 feet
Garage or carport: 15 feet
Minimum Yard Setbacks Front yard: 20 feet; 19 feet allowed on lots fronting a 60-foot right of way street
Side yard:
 Interior lot: 5 feet
 Corner lot, interior side: 5 feet
 Corner lot, street side: 10 feet
 Reverse corner lot: 15 feet
Rear Yard: 15 feet
Side yard, Zero Lot Line. Zero lot line
development shall be allowed with a tenfoot setback on the adjoining lot.

OR
Zero Lot Line on same lot line to allow
duplexes on adjoining sides with a
minimum 10-foot setback between
structures on the opposite side yard.

Minimum Space between
buildings
Between two buildings of residential use: 10
feet
Between any main building and all nonhabitable accessory buildings: 6 feet 151
SECTION 4. Subsection 153.071(P) is added to Section 153.071 titled Street Specifications of the San Joaquin Municipal Code as follows:
152
(1) SIDEWALK TRANS~!ION TO DRIVE APPROACH
ROLL

CU RB AND GUTTER
1----------8'-0"---------i
ROLL

CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK
153
R/11 R/11
1--------26.S'--------+--------26.5'-------I
C1TY S7/J a/118 W/CIJTTEII All{) 5' SIOEWAlK.
~ /JC£ C//1<9 lf/CllnE!I AllO 4.5' S!{)£1fAlK
PB/ li£TAf1. H!R£0N TO 8( CWST11t/C!EfJ AT
bl/I'll: APPl?OACH£S Ol,t Y.

NW
R/11
- [ - - Al,{;ll£CA7E BASE CIASS llcat!PAC7ED NAllV£ stJBCRAO£ TO 95:t R£l All'IE: COIIP. ASTII 01557- 78 Tr STD CVllfJ W/CIJTTEII ANO 5' S!!J£WAl K.
ll!DC£ C/J/18 W/CIJTTE/1 A/10 4.S' S!{)£1fAlK
ff/I {)£TAIi. 11£1<£0.V TO l?E CWSlfll/C!EfJ AT
b/111£ APPf!OACH£S Oh!Y.
6' SJNO OIi AC BASE Cl N {l!{l)8/ AU ewe S11/EET IVPROVf/,fENTS PROPOSED 53' STREET SECTION
NOT TO SCAlE
SE
R/W
l-+-------26.5"--------+-------18.5'-----IHI
CONS'/lrf/CT CVP8, Q/77(R All/)
SIOEWAI.K Pf!? CITY STO P-1

7.5' 1g•-----+- ---u · ..s·
--~~ ~=-L· LS.
- -::. ;-=--;--- ----:: X - f'"-"rl
TYPICAL 44' R/ W SECTION
11 TH STREET
NOT TO SCALE R= T.I.=
AC Fla.D
<XY-IS71?f/CT 6' HO::I? rofC£
w,Nn. TRaUS FOH IINES
Exhibit B: Rezoning Map
154
~
.g "
~
0 g
iii
CJ)
San Joaquin City Boundary
D Parcels
LJ Proposed Zoning
Current Zoning
- Commercial (C)
- Main Street Commercial (C-MS)
- Manufacturing (M)
- Open Space (OS)
- Public/Semi-Public Facilities
(PSP)
Single-Family Residential (R-1)
- Multi-Family Residential (R-2)
- Multi-Family Residential (R-3)
- Railroad Right of Way (Not a
Zoned)
0 0.13 0.25 N
Miles A
Basemap provided by Esri and its licensors © 2024.

I=======~ ~======w:springfiela-Awve:e=====~ ~========;
18-06412 EPS Safety Element
Fig 1 Zoning
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-27

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SAN JOAQUIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MAIN

STREET TOWNHOMES PROJECT INITIAL STUDY

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS-MND) AND

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR A LAND USE

DESIGNATION CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2023, Terra Firma Development LLC (“Applicant”) proposed a General Plan Amendment for a land use redesignation from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential to allow for the subdivision of APN-033-040-50 (TTM 6456) into 38 single family lots; and
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 2025-02 recommending approval to the City Council of said General Plan Amendment and the and Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND); and WHEREAS, on June 3, 2025, the City Council of the City of San Joaquin conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the General Plan Amendment and Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) and at the hearing, all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the City Council received and considered the staff report and all the information, evidence, and testimony presented in connection with this Project; WHEREAS, per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared by Applicant to assess the adoption of Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 6456, General Plan Amendments, and zoning amendments to evaluate potentially significant environmental impacts, and on the basis of that study it was determined that no significant environmental impacts would result from the project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the analysis and finds that the proposed General Plan Amendment, zoning amendments, and TTM complies with CEQA Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines Section 21081.6) prior to making a decision on the adoption of the IS-MND and General Plan Amendments; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Joaquin finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

1. The City Council finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council has considered the IS-MND for the General Plan Amendment, zoning amendments, and TTM 6456 prior to making a decision on the Project (attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference) and approves the IS-MND.

3. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the IS-MND and then approves the General Plan Amendment to redesignate APN 033-040-50 from Low 155
Density Residential to Medium Density Residential as set forth in the findings in Resolution 2025-02.

4. The City Council approves the General Plan Amendment to redesignate APN-033-040-50 from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential as depicted in Exhibit B attached to this resolution and incorporated by reference.

5. This Resolution is effective thirty days after adoption.

The forgoing resolution was adopted at a regular council meeting of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin the 3rd day of June 2025, and passed at said meeting with the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Hilda Cantú Montoy
City Attorney
Exhibit A: Main Street Townhomes IS-MND
Exhibit B: General Plan Amendment
156
Exhibit B
157
W Parlier.:Ave==r=======-_ _Jj
JD San Joaqu-1·n_C_i_t ____ Jj_ ,-----, p Y Boundary
L___J arcels
D Proposed Land Use .

General Plan L Designation and Use o - LD - Low . es1gnation MD Density Residential
-Medium D . Residential ens1ty
- HD-HighDen NC si . . ty Residential
- Neighborhood C
- CC_ Com . ommercial
-
mun1tyCo CBD C mmercial
-
- entral Busi . I - Ind . ness District
Cherry Ln 1~r==-
ra
;o
R
- ustnal
-
PF - Public Facility
Railroad

0.13 -----::-:-1----0 _. 25 N
Miles A
Basemap provided b Y Esn . and its r ,censors©
0 ©:m'Z""°_j_ _____ jj[~~~~~~~==--·w:sp1;ngfieia-Av~•====-_Jj I 18-06412 EPS Fig Sla~ety Element eneral Plan

STAFF REPORT
Date: June 3, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Mario Gouveia, City Engineer
REVIEWED BY: Elizabeth Cabrera, City Manager
SUBJECT:

A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin, California, confirming Diagram and Assessments for the Annual Levy for 2025-2026 of Assessment District No. 92-3. (Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
RECOMMENDATION:

1. Conduct a public hearing to receive testimony regarding proposed 2025-2026 assessments for the City of San Joaquin’s Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 92-3.

2. Adopt Resolution 2025-28 confirming the diagram and assessments for the annual levy of the City of San Joaquin’s Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 92-3 for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 and direct the Deputy City Clerk to file the annual Engineer’s Report with the County of Fresno, California.

BACKGROUND:

The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that an annual review and updated Engineer’s Report be prepared to set Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District rates each fiscal year. The Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 assessments in the City of San Joaquin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 92-3 Final Engineer’s Report will be assessed on the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 property tax roll. The assessments may or may not change from fiscal year to fiscal year, dependent upon maintenance to be performed, but cannot exceed the maximum amount set when the districts were originally formed. Areas 5 and 6 are adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). As a part of the process, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that an Engineer’s Report must be filed and a Public Hearing be held.

DISCUSSION:

On March 04, 2025 Council by Resolution designated Gouveia Engineering, Inc. as the Engineer of Work and directed the filing of the City of San Joaquin Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 92-3 Preliminary Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.

On May 06, 2025, Council by Resolution declared the intention to order improvements and levy and collect assessment for the City of San Joaquin Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 92-3 for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and set the Public Hearing date for June 3, 2025.

The Engineer’s Report for the Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District contains a detailed description of the improvements being maintained, the boundaries of the Assessment District, and the proposed assessment for each property within the Assessment District and is on file with the Deputy City Clerk for review. No annexations of new property have occurred to the District over the past year. 158
FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed assessments are essential to pay for the required maintenance and improvements of common areas within each district. It is anticipated the City will collect approximately $30,334.50 from the City of San Joaquin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 92-3 Assessments to cover estimated maintenance, utility and administration expenses for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution No. 2025-28
Engineer’s Report May 2025
159
1 | Page
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-28

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN,

CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY FOR 2025-2026 OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 92-3
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011 Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 92-3 and directing the Preliminary Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-20 Declaring its Intention to Levy and Collect the Annual Assessments for Assessment District No. 92-3 of the City of San Joaquin (herein “District); and setting a public hearing. and WHEREAS, the Council did declare in said Resolution of Intention its intention to levy and collect the annual assessments for the maintenance and operation of streets, public landscaping, parks, and street light facilities in the District; and WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention was duly published and notice given of the public hearing as provided by law.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED, as follows:

1. The Council hereby determines that the territory within the District, whose boundaries are set forth in the Engineer’s Report for the City of San Joaquin Assessment District No. 92-3 for fiscal year 2025-2026, and on file with the City Clerk of the City of San Joaquin will be the territory benefited by the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in said Engineer’s Report.

2. The public hearing on said annual levy of assessment was held in accordance with law on June 3, 2025. All persons filing protests or requesting to speak and who appeared were heard.

3. The Engineer’s Report, the diagram for the assessment district, and the assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements contained therein, and hereto attached to be recorded, and each and every part of said Report, is adopted and approved; and the assessment upon the land in the District being found to be in proportion to the benefits to be received from the improvements, are finally approved and confirmed as the assessment to pay the costs of said improvements and the expenses incidental thereto.

4. The Council hereby orders the levy of the assessments described in said Resolution of Intention and the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report is attached as Exhibit A to this resolution.
160
2 | Page

5. The assessment diagram showing the assessment district referred to in said Resolution of Intention and also the subdivisions of land within the District, as contained in said Engineer’s Report, is the diagram of the properties that are to be assessed to pay the District costs.

6. The City Clerk is directed to record this resolution including the Engineer’s Report (Exhibit A), confirming the diagram and assessment for the annual levy for 2025-2026 of Assessment District No. 92-3 with the County of Fresno.

7. The Engineer of Work is directed to prepare and submit the Diagram and Assessment regarding the levy of assessments and all assessment information required by the Fresno County Auditor-Controller / Treasurer-Tax Collector for placement on the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 secured property tax roll as soon as possible but not later than August 10, 2024.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THEREFORE, that the City Council of the City of San Joaquin finds as follows:

A. That the assessment imposed hereby is an assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs of maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets and integral portions of each of the above-described facilities and is not based on property valuation.

B. That the assessment imposed is hereby imposed at the assessment rate according to the methodology adopted pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed, or that the assessment imposed hereby is imposed at the assessment rate and according to the methodology adopted pursuant to majority voter approval from the voters voting in an election on the issue of such assessment.

CERTIFICATION
The foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin held on the 3rd day of June, 2025 and passed at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Adam Flores-Cornejo, Mayor
ATTEST:

Matthew Flood, City Clerk
161

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN

FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 92-3
ENGINEER’S REPORT
2025 – 2026
May 2025
162
I

ASSESSMENT REPORT
INDEX
PAGE
ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT ......................................................... 1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARIES........................................................................ 5 DESCRIPTION OF WORK................................................................................................ 6 ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE.......................................................................................... 7 COST SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 9 ASSESSMENT ROLL ....................................................................................................... 11

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
163
1 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN

FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 92-3
ENGINEER’S REPORT
WHEREAS, on November 10, 1992, the City Council of the City of San Joaquin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq., adopted its Resolution No. 92-31, Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the purpose of collecting assessments to defray the cost of maintaining the street lighting, streets, public landscaping, and parks within designated areas in the City of San Joaquin, more particularly therein described;
WHEREAS, said Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the Engineer of Work to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 Chapter 1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, pursuant to Section 22585, including the estimate of costs of improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, a diagram of the assessment district, and a proposed assessment of the costs of the improvements to which Resolution Initiating Proceedings reference is hereby made for further particulars. The improvements shall consist of the maintenance of all of the street lighting facilities, streets, public landscaping, and parks located in designated areas of the City of San Joaquin.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mario B. Gouveia, Engineer of Work of said Assessment District No. 92- 3 by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin, hereby make the following annual levy of assessment in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3 of the Streets & Highways Code of the State of California to cover the portion of the estimated cost of said work and improvements pursuant to the plans and specifications presently on file with the Clerk of the City of San Joaquin and in the Department of Public Works of the City of San Joaquin and incorporated herein by reference and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by the assessment district set forth in this Report.

As required by said Act, Assessment Diagram of City of San Joaquin Assessment District No. 92- 3 shows the assessment district and the boundaries of land within said district as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution Initiating Proceedings, each subdivision of land having been given a separate number by reference to County of Fresno Tax Assessor's Parcel Number.

I do hereby assess and apportion said total amount of the cost and expenses of the proposed improvement upon the several subdivisions of land liable therefore and benefited thereby all as is more particularly set forth in the assessment roll attached hereto and incorporated herein; and that the numbers of said assessment roll correspond with the numbers upon the referenced County of Fresno Assessor's Parcel Maps. Said assessment is made upon the several subdivisions of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each subdivision respectively from the improvement. For a more particular description of said property, 164
165
reference is made to the assessment roll and the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of Fresno County and to the notes of said Boundary Description as set forth in the map of Proposed Boundaries of City of San Joaquin Assessment District No. 92- 3, contained in this assessment report.

Respectfully Submitted,
21Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
166

ENGINEER'S REPORT
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 92-3
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19 72) The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed reP. rt as directed by the City Council.

Dated: May 6, 2025
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engine r's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment and Boundary Diagrams of the City San Joaquin Assessment District No. 92-3, thereto attached, and was filed with me on the 6th day of May, 2025.

Matthew Flood, City Clerk, San Joaquin,
Fresno County, California
By Matthewld,City ~ Clerk
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment and Boundary Diagrams of the City of San Joaquin Assessment District No. 92-3, thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Joaquin, California, on the 3rd day of June, 2025, by its Resolution No. 2025-__ Nancy Banda, Finance Director
San Joaquin, Fresno County, California
By ________________ _
Nancy Banda, Finance Director
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment and Boundary Diagrams of the City of San Joaquin Assessment District No. 92-3, thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Joaquin, California, on the 3rd day of June, 2025.
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
Matt Flood, Assistant City Manager, City Clerk
San Joaquin, Fresno County, California
By ___________ _____ _
Matt Flood, Assistant City Manager, City Clerk
31Page
4 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
CLERK’S CERTIFICATION TO COUNTY AUDITOR
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 92-3
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF THE COUNTY OF FRESNO:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the attached document is a true copy of that certain Engineer’s Report, including assessment and assessment diagram, for Assessment District No. 92-3, City of San Joaquin, confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Joaquin on the 3rd day of June, 2025, by its Resolution No. 2025- .

The document is certified, and is filed with you, pursuant to Section 22641 of the Streets and Highways Code.

DATED:

By
Matthew Flood, Assistant City Manager, City Clerk
City of San Joaquin
[SEAL]
167
5 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 92-3

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The boundaries of the Assessment District are generally described as:

1. Tract No. 4076, Colorado Estates recorded November 29, 1990 in Volume 51 of Plats at Pages 92 & 93, Fresno County Records.

2. Tract No. 4496, Phase 1 recorded December 15, 1992 in Volume 55 of Plats at Pages 23 & 24, Fresno County Records.

3. Lots 9 through 12 in Block 14, Lots 1 through 12 in Block 24, Lots 1 through 12 in Block 44 and Lots 25 through 36 in Block 43, all in the Townsite of San Joaquin, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 7, Pages 83, 84, and 85 of Plats, Fresno County Records.

4. Lots 46-48 in Block 41 in the Townsite of San Joaquin according to the map thereof recorded in Book 7, Pages 83, 84, and 85 of Plats, Fresno County Records.

5. Parcel Map No. 99-01, recorded November 18, 1999 in Volume 60 of Parcel Maps at Page 4, Fresno County Records.

6. Parcel Map No. 98-03, recorded July 2, 1999 in Volume 59 of Parcel Maps at Page 70, Fresno County Records.

7. Parcel Map No. 99-02, recorded March 9, 2000 in Volume 60 of Parcel Maps at Page 40, Fresno County Records.

8. Tract No. 4816, Joaquin Park II, recorded February 19, 1997 in Volume 60 of Plats at Page 51, Fresno County Records.

9. Tract No. 4786, Casa Mia Estates, recorded November 10, 1997 in Volume 61 of Plats at Pages 46 & 47, Fresno County Records.

10. Tract No. 4841, Casa Mia Estates II recorded July 23, 1998 in Volume 61 of Plats at Pages 76 & 77, Fresno County Records.

11. Tract No. 4766, recorded August 31, 1998 in Volume 61 of Plats at Pages 91 and 92, Fresno County Records.

12. Tract No. 4829, Joaquin Park III recorded September 15, 1998 in Volume 61 of Plats at Pages 97 & 98, Fresno County Records.

13. Tract No. 4865, Monterey Pines recorded January 22, 1999 in Volume 62 of Plats at Page 54, Fresno County Records.

14. Tract No. 4871, Casa Mia Estates III recorded October 28, 2004 in Volume 70 at Pages 94 and 95 Fresno County Records.

15. Tract No. 4893, Casa Mia Estates IV recorded August 16, 2005 in Volume 73 of Plats at Pages 38 and 39 Fresno County Records.

16. Tract No. 5814, recorded November 20, 2007 in Volume 80 of Plats at Pages 18& 19, Fresno County Records.
168
6 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 92-3

DESCRIPTION OF WORK
AREA 1 – Tract No. 4076, Tract No. 4786, and Tract No. 4841 Maintenance of street lights and streets, including sidewalks, within Tract No. 4076, Tract No. 4786 and Tract No. 4841, along the following streets: northeast half of Colorado Avenue; Colorado Court; northwest half of Fifth Street; Nevada Avenue; Fourth Street, Annabella Avenue, Third Street, White Avenue and California Avenue.

AREA 2 – Tract No. 4496, Phase 1, Tract No. 4766, and Tract No. 4865 Maintenance of public landscape areas, street lights, and streets, including sidewalks within Tract No. 4496, Tract No. 4766, and Tract No. 4865, along the following streets: northeast half of California Avenue; northwest half of Main Street; southeast half of Eighth Street; Ninth street; Orlando Court; Punjab Avenue; and Arizona Avenue.

AREA 3 – Portions of Blocks 14, 24, 43, and 44 of the Townsite of San Joaquin, Tract No. 4816, and Tract No. 4829
Maintenance of street lights and streets, including sidewalks, along the following streets: southeast half of 12th Street, from the southwest line of Lot 9 in Block 14 to the southwest boundary of Arizona Avenue; northwest half of 12th Street, from the centerline of California Avenue to the southwest boundary of Arizona Avenue; California Avenue, from southeast boundary of Lot 12 in Block 24 to the centerline of 12th Street; northeast half of California Avenue, from the centerline of 12th Street to the northwest boundary of Lot 34 in Block 43; southwest half of Arizona Avenue, from the southeast line of Lot 12 in Block 44 to the northwest boundary of Lot 25 in Block 43; all in the Townsite of San Joaquin.

Maintenance of public landscape areas, street lights and streets, including sidewalks, within Tract No. 4816 and Tract No. 4829 along the northeast half of California Avenue and the southeast half of Main Street, Punjab Street, Deep Street and Aman Street.

AREA 4 – PM No. 99-01, PM No. 98-03, and PM No. 99-02
Maintenance of street lights and streets, including sidewalks, within Parcel Map No. 99-01, Parcel Map No. 98-03, and Parcel Map No. 99-02, along the north half of Manning Avenue and the northeast half of Colorado Avenue.

AREA 5 – Tract No. 4871 and Tract No. 4893
Maintenance of street lights and streets, including sidewalks, within Tract No. 4871 and 4893 along the following streets: northeast half of Colorado Avenue; Elm Avenue; First Street; First Court; Annabella Avenue; Second Street and Second Court.

AREA 6 – Tract No. 5814
Maintenance of street lights and streets, including sidewalks along public streets within Tract No. 5814 along Main Street, Arizona Street, Deep Street and Aman Street. Also included is maintenance of landscaping along Main Street bordering Tract No. 5814.

169
7 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 92-3

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
The assessment district boundaries coincide with the boundaries of six specific development projects within the city limits of the City of San Joaquin. Each project is designated as Area 1, Area 2, Area 3, Area 4, Area 5 and Area 6 respectively, as described herein.

Assessments for lots in Areas 1 through 4 cannot be raised without a vote of the lot owners per the requirements of Proposition 218. Assessments for Areas 5 and 6 are adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The maximum annual CPI adjustment is not to exceed 3%.

The total net costs for each area are as follows:

Area 1 $ 5,537.60
Area 2 $ 5,729.10
Area 3 $ 4,600.86
Area 4 $ 1,910.42
Area 5 $ 10,120.97
Area 6 $ 2,438.35
Total Cost $ 30,337.30
The total numbers of parcels is 358 and are described by Area designation as follows:

Area 1 contains seventy-six (76) single-family residential lots, four (4) residential lots zoned for duplexes, one (1) 4.39 acre parcel zoned for a residential planned unit development, and four (4) commercial lots.

The duplex lots and single-family lots are assessed for maintenance of fronting street and street light improvements on Fifth Street, Nevada Avenue, Third Street, Fourth Street, Annabella Avenue, White Avenue and California Avenue on a per lot basis. The one (1) residential planned unit development parcel and the four (4) commercial lots are not assessed.

There are five (5) parcels in Area 1 that are owned by the County of Fresno Housing Authority which are tax-exempt and are not assessed.

Area 2 contains sixty-five (65) single-family residential lots, and one (1) park parcel. The single-family residential lots and park parcel are assessed for maintenance of fronting street, street light and side yard landscaping along California Avenue and Main Street on a per lot basis.

Area 3 contains thirty-five (35) single-family residential lots and fifty-two (52) lots containing half of a duplex.

Each lot is assessed for maintenance of fronting street, landscaping, and street light improvements on 12th Street, California Avenue, Punjab Street, Deep Street, Aman Street, Main Street and Arizona Avenue.

Area 4 contains five (5) commercial lots. Each lot is assessed an equal share for maintenance of fronting street and street light improvements on Manning Avenue and Colorado Avenue. Assessments vary by parcel size.

Area 5 contains sixty-two (62) single-family residential lots and one (1) commercial lot. The single-family residential lots and commercial lot are assessed for maintenance of fronting street, landscaping and light 170
8 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
improvements on Colorado Avenue; Elm Avenue; First Street; Second Street; Annabelle Avenue; First Court and Second Court. Assessments in Area 5 are subject to adjustments based on changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The maximum allowable assessment increase is equal to the change in CPI and shall not exceed 3.0%. The CPI increased 2.9% in 2024. In accordance with the foregoing limitations, the assessments for fiscal year 2025-2026 will increase by 2.9%.

Area 6 contains forty-nine (49) multi-family residential lots and four (4) outlots. The multi-family lots are assessed for maintenance of fronting streets and lighting facilities, and landscaping along Main Street. The four (4) outlots are not assessed. Assessments in Area 6 are subject to adjustments based on changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The maximum allowable assessment increase is equal to the change in CPI and shall not exceed 3.0%. The CPI increased 2.9% in 2024. In accordance with the foregoing limitations, the assessments for fiscal year 2025-2026 will increase by 2.9%.

Formation and incidental costs were assessed to each parcel or lot on an equal basis. 171
9 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 92-3

COST SUMMARY
2025 – 2026

ESTIMATE OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT COSTS
The estimate of Assessment District improvement costs for fiscal year 2025-2026 is as follows:

AREA 1

1. INCIDENTAL COSTS $ 709.02

2. UTILITIES COST 844.01

3. MAINTENANCE COST 3,984.57
TOTAL COSTS $ 5,537.60
TOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT $ 5,537.60
TOTAL NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE PARCELS 80
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS 85
(80 lots @ $69.22 and 5 lots @ $0.00)
AREA 2

1. INCIDENTAL COSTS $ 733.60

2. UTILITIES COST 873.28

3. MAINTENANCE COST 4,122.22
TOTAL COSTS $ 5,729.10
TOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT $ 5,729.10
TOTAL NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE PARCELS 65
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS 65
(65 lots @ $88.14)
AREA 3

1. INCIDENTAL COSTS $ 589.08

2. UTILITIES COST 701.24

3. MAINTENANCE COST 3,310.54
TOTAL COSTS $ 4,600.86
TOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT $ 4,600.86
TOTAL NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE PARCELS 87
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS 87
(35 lots @ $73.54 and 52 lots @ $38.98)
172
10 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
AREA 4

1. INCIDENTAL COSTS $ 244.60

2. UTILITIES COST 291.18

3. MAINTENANCE COST 1,374.64
TOTAL COSTS $ 1,910.42
TOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT $ 1,910.42
TOTAL NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE PARCELS 5
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS 5
(Varies by Parcel Size)
AREA 5

1. INCIDENTAL COSTS $ 1,295.86

2. UTILITIES COST 1,542.55

3. MAINTENANCE COST 7,282.56
TOTAL COSTS $ 10,120.97
TOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT $ *10,119.26
TOTAL NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE PARCELS 63
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS 63
(62 lots @ *$153.80 and 1 lot @ $583.66)
AREA 6

1. INCIDENTAL COSTS $ 312.23

2. UTILITIES COST 371.70

3. MAINTENANCE COST 1,754.42
TOTAL COSTS $ 2,438.35
TOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT $ *2,437.26
TOTAL NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE PARCELS 49
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS 49
(49 lots @ $49.74)
* Amount rounded down one cent to conform to County Auditor requirements that the amount to be billed to the tax payer must be an even amount (divisible by 2) 173

ASSESSMENT ROLL
174

ASSESSMENT ROLL

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN

FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.92.3
(Fiscal Year 2025-2026)

ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM NUMBER CODE LOT NO.

ASSESSOR’S

PARCEL NUMBER
TOTAL

ASSESSMENT
11 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
001 6195 1 033-210-01ST $00.00
002 6195 2 033-210-02ST $00.00
003 6195 3 033-210-03ST $00.00
004 6195 4 033-210-04ST $00.00
005 6195 5 033-210-05ST $00.00
006 6195 6 033-210-06S $69.22
007 6195 7 033-210-07S $69.22
008 6195 8 033-210-08S $69.22
009 6195 9 033-210-09S $69.22
010 6195 10 033-210-10S $69.22
011 6195 11 033-210-11S $69.22
012 6195 12 033-210-12S $69.22
013 6195 13 033-210-13S $69.22
014 6195 14 033-210-14S $69.22
015 6195 15 033-210-15S $69.22
016 6195 16 033-210-16S $69.22
017 6195 17 033-210-17S $69.22
018 6195 18 033-210-18S $69.22
019 6195 19 033-210-19S $69.22
020 6195 20 033-210-20S $69.22
021 6195 21 033-210-21S $69.22
022 6195 22 033-210-22S $69.22
023 6195 23 033-210-23S $69.22
024 6195 24 033-210-24S $69.22
025 6195 25 033-210-25S $69.22
026 6195 26 033-210-26S $69.22
027 6195 27 033-210-27S $69.22
028 6195 28 033-210-28S $69.22
029 6195 29 033-210-29S $69.22
030 6195 1 033-221-05S $88.14
031 6195 2 033-221-04S $88.14
032 6195 3 033-221-03S $88.14
033 6195 4 033-221-02S $88.14
034 6195 5 033-221-01S $88.14
035 6195 6 033-221-06S $88.14
036 6195 7 033-221-07S $88.14
175
(Fiscal Year 2025-2026)

ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM NUMBER CODE LOT NO.

ASSESSOR’S

PARCEL NUMBER
TOTAL

ASSESSMENT
12 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
037 6195 8 033-221-08S $88.14
038 6195 9 033-221-09S $88.14
039 6195 10 033-221-10S $88.14
040 6195 11 033-221-11S $88.14
041 6195 12 033-221-12S $88.14
042 6195 13 033-221-13S $88.14
043 6195 14 033-221-14S $88.14
044 6195 15 033-221-15S $88.14
045 6195 16 033-221-16S $88.14
046 6195 17 033-221-17S $88.14
047 6195 18 033-221-18S $88.14
048 6195 19 033-221-19S $88.14
049 6195 20 033-221-20S $88.14
050 6195 21 033-221-21S $88.14
051 6195 22 033-221-22S $88.14
052 6195 23 033-221-23S $88.14
053 6195 24 033-221-24S $88.14
054 6195 25 033-221-25S $88.14
057 6195 1 033-240-01S $73.54
058 6195 2 033-240-02S $73.54
059 6195 3 033-240-03S $73.54
060 6195 4 033-240-04S $73.54
061 6195 5 033-240-05S $73.54
062 6195 6 033-240-06S $73.54
063 6195 7 033-240-07S $73.54
064 6195 8 033-240-08S $73.54
065 6195 9 033-240-09S $73.54
066 6195 10 033-240-10S $73.54
067 6195 11 033-240-11S $73.54
068 6195 12 033-240-12S $73.54
069 6195 13 033-240-13S $73.54
070 6195 14 033-240-14S $73.54
071 6195 15 033-240-15S $73.54
072 6195 16 033-232-01S $73.54
073 6195 17 033-232-02S $73.54
074 6195 18 033-232-03S $73.54
075 6195 19 033-232-04S $73.54
076 6195 20 033-232-05S $73.54
077 6195 21 033-232-06S $73.54
078 6195 22 033-232-07S $73.54
079 6195 23 033-232-08S $73.54
080 6195 24 033-232-09S $73.54
081 6195 25 033-232-10S $73.54
176
(Fiscal Year 2025-2026)

ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM NUMBER CODE LOT NO.

ASSESSOR’S

PARCEL NUMBER
TOTAL

ASSESSMENT
13 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
082 6195 26 033-231-10S $73.54
083 6195 27 033-231-09S $73.54
084 6195 28 033-231-08S $73.54
085 6195 29 033-231-07S $73.54
086 6195 30 033-231-06S $73.54
087 6195 31 033-231-05S $73.54
088 6195 32 033-231-04S $73.54
089 6195 33 033-231-03S $73.54
090 6195 34 033-231-02S $73.54
091 6195 35 033-231-01S $73.54
102 6195 2 033-040-86S $69.56
103 6195 3 033-040-91S $219.70
104 6195 1 033-231-53S $38.98
105 6195 2 033-231-52S $38.98
106 6195 3 033-231-51S $38.98
107 6195 4 033-231-50S $38.98
108 6195 5 033-231-49S $38.98
109 6195 6 033-231-48S $38.98
110 6195 7 033-231-47S $38.98
111 6195 8 033-231-46S $38.98
112 6195 9 033-231-45S $38.98
113 6195 10 033-231-44S $38.98
114 6195 11 033-231-43S $38.98
115 6195 12 033-231-42S $38.98
116 6195 13 033-231-41S $38.98
117 6195 14 033-231-40S $38.98
118 6195 15 033-231-39S $38.98
119 6195 16 033-231-38S $38.98
120 6195 17 033-231-37S $38.98
121 6195 18 033-231-36S $38.98
122 6195 1 033-250-01S $69.22
123 6195 2 033-250-02S $69.22
124 6195 3 033-250-03S $69.22
125 6195 4 033-250-04S $69.22
126 6195 5 033-250-05S $69.22
127 6195 6 033-250-06S $69.22
128 6195 7 033-250-07S $69.22
129 6195 8 033-250-08S $69.22
130 6195 9 033-250-09S $69.22
131 6195 10 033-250-10S $69.22
132 6195 11 033-250-11S $69.22
133 6195 12 033-250-12S $69.22
134 6195 13 033-250-13S $69.22
177
(Fiscal Year 2025-2026)

ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM NUMBER CODE LOT NO.

ASSESSOR’S

PARCEL NUMBER
TOTAL

ASSESSMENT
14 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
135 6195 14 033-250-14S $69.22
136 6195 15 033-250-15S $69.22
137 6195 16 033-250-16S $69.22
138 6195 17 033-250-17S $69.22
139 6195 18 033-250-18S $69.22
140 6195 19 033-250-19S $69.22
141 6195 20 033-250-20S $69.22
142 6195 21 033-250-21S $69.22
143 6195 22 033-250-22S $69.22
144 6195 23 033-250-23S $69.22
145 6195 24 033-250-24S $69.22
147 6195 1 033-250-26S $69.22
148 6195 2 033-250-27S $69.22
149 6195 3 033-250-28S $69.22
150 6195 4 033-250-29S $69.22
151 6195 5 03-3250-30S $69.22
152 6195 6 033-250-31S $69.22
153 6195 7 033-250-32S $69.22
154 6195 8 033-250-33S $69.22
155 6195 9 033-250-34S $69.22
156 6195 10 033-250-35S $69.22
157 6195 11 033-250-36S $69.22
158 6195 12 03-3250-37S $69.22
159 6195 13 033-250-38S $69.22
160 6195 14 033-250-39S $69.22
161 6195 15 033-250-40S $69.22
162 6195 16 033-250-41S $69.22
163 6195 17 033-250-42S $69.22
164 6195 18 033-250-43S $69.22
165 6195 19 033-250-44S $69.22
166 6195 20 033-250-45S $69.22
167 6195 21 033-250-46S $69.22
168 6195 22 033-250-47S $69.22
169 6195 23 033-250-48S $69.22
170 6195 24 033-250-49S $69.22
171 6195 25 033-250-50S $69.22
172 6195 26 033-250-51S $69.22
173 6195 27 033-250-52S $69.22
174 6195 28 033-250-53S $69.22
175 6195 29 033-25-054S $69.22
176 6195 30 033-250-55S $69.22
177 6195 31 033-250-56S $69.22
178 6195 32 033-250-57S $69.22
178
(Fiscal Year 2025-2026)

ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM NUMBER CODE LOT NO.

ASSESSOR’S

PARCEL NUMBER
TOTAL

ASSESSMENT
15 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
179 6195 1 033-221-27S $88.14
180 6195 2 033-221-28S $88.14
181 6195 3 033-221-29S $88.14
182 6195 4 033-221-30S $88.14
183 6195 5 033-221-31S $88.14
184 6195 6 0332-21-32S $88.14
185 6195 7 033-221-33S $88.14
186 6195 8 033-221-34S $88.14
187 6195 9 033-221-35S $88.14
188 6195 10 033-221-36S $88.14
189 6195 11 033-221-37S $88.14
190 6195 12 033-221-38S $88.14
191 6195 13 033-221-39S $88.14
192 6195 14 033-221-40S $88.14
193 6195 15 033-221-41S $88.14
194 6195 16 033-221-42S $88.14
195 6195 17 033-221-43S $88.14
196 6195 18 033-221-44S $88.14
197 6195 19 033-221-45S $88.14
198 6195 20 033-221-46S $88.14
199 6195 21 033-221-47S $88.14
200 6195 22 033-221-48S $88.14
201 6195 23 033-221-49S $88.14
202 6195 24 033-221-50S $88.14
203 6195 25 033-221-51S $88.14
204 6195 26 033-221-52S $88.14
205 6195 27 033-221-53S $88.14
206 6195 28 033-221-54S $88.14
207 6195 1 033-231-35S $38.98
208 6195 2 033-231-34S $38.98
209 6195 3 033-231-33S $38.98
210 6195 4 033-231-32S $38.98
211 6195 5 03-3231-31S $38.98
212 6195 6 033-231-30S $38.98
213 6195 7 033-231-29S $38.98
214 6195 8 033-231-28S $38.98
215 6195 9 033-231-27S $38.98
216 6195 10 033-231-26S $38.98
217 6195 11 033-231-25S $38.98
218 6195 12 033-231-24S $38.98
219 6195 13 033-231-23S $38.98
220 6195 14 033-231-22S $38.98
221 6195 15 033-231-21S $38.98
179
(Fiscal Year 2025-2026)

ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM NUMBER CODE LOT NO.

ASSESSOR’S

PARCEL NUMBER
TOTAL

ASSESSMENT
16 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
222 6195 16 033-231-20S $38.98
223 6195 17 033-231-19S $38.98
224 6195 18 033-231-18S $38.98
225 6195 19 033-231-17S $38.98
226 6195 20 033-231-16S $38.98
227 6195 21 033-231-15S $38.98
228 6195 22 033-231-14S $38.98
229 6195 23 033-233-01S $38.98
230 6195 24 033-233-02S $38.98
231 6195 25 033-233-03S $38.98
232 6195 26 033-233-04S $38.98
233 6195 27 033-233-05S $38.98
234 6195 28 033-233-06S $38.98
235 6195 29 033-234-01S $38.98
236 6195 30 03-3234-02S $38.98
237 6195 31 033-234-03S $38.98
238 6195 32 033-234-04S $38.98
239 6195 33 033-234-05S $38.98
240 6195 34 033-234-06S $38.98
241 6195 1 033-260-01S $88.14
242 6195 2 033-260-02S $88.14
243 6195 3 033-260-03S $88.14
244 6195 4 033-260-04S $88.14
245 6195 5 033-260-05S $88.14
246 6195 6 033-260-06S $88.14
247 6195 7 033-260-07S $88.14
248 6195 8 033-260-08S $88.14
249 6195 9 033-260-09S $88.14
250 6195 10 033-260-10S $88.14
251 6195 11 033-260-11S $88.14
252 6195 12 033-260-12S $88.14
254 6195 2 033-040-87S $152.96
255 6195 1 033-040-88S $927.58
256 6195 1 033-040-89S $540.62
257 6195 1 033-270-01S $153.80
258 6195 2 033-270-02S $153.80
259 6195 3 033-270-03S $153.80
260 6195 4 033-270-04S $153.80
261 6195 5 033-270-05S $153.80
262 6195 6 033-270-06S $153.80
263 6195 7 033-270-07S $153.80
264 6195 8 033-270-08S $153.80
265 6195 9 033-270-09S $153.80
180
(Fiscal Year 2025-2026)

ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM NUMBER CODE LOT NO.

ASSESSOR’S

PARCEL NUMBER
TOTAL

ASSESSMENT
17 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
266 6195 10 033-270-10S $153.80
267 6195 11 033-270-11S $153.80
268 6195 12 033-270-12S $153.80
269 6195 13 033-270-13S $153.80
270 6195 14 033-270-14S $153.80
271 6195 15 033-270-15S $153.80
272 6195 16 033-270-16S $153.80
273 6195 17 033-270-17S $153.80
274 6195 18 033-270-18S $153.80
275 6195 19 033-270-19S $153.80
276 6195 20 033-270-20S $153.80
277 6195 21 033-270-21S $153.80
278 6195 22 033-270-22S $153.80
279 6195 23 033-270-23S $153.80
280 6195 24 033-270-24S $153.80
281 6195 25 033-270-25S $153.80
282 6195 26 033-270-26S $153.80
283 6195 27 033-270-27S $153.80
284 6195 28 033-270-28S $153.80
285 6195 31 033-270-31S $153.80
286 6195 30 033-270-30S $153.80
287 6195 29 033-270-29S $153.80
288 6195 32 033-270-32S $583.66
289 6195 5 033-270-34S $153.80
290 6195 6 033-270-35S $153.80
291 6195 7 033-270-36S $153.80
292 6195 8 033-270-37S $153.80
293 6195 9 033-270-38S $153.80
294 6195 10 033-270-39S $153.80
295 6195 11 033-270-40S $153.80
296 6195 12 033-270-41S $153.80
297 6195 13 03-3270-42S $153.80
298 6195 14 033-270-43S $153.80
299 6195 15 033-270-44S $153.80
300 6195 16 033-270-45S $153.80
301 6195 17 033-270-46S $153.80
302 6195 18 033-270-47S $153.80
303 6195 19 033-270-48S $153.80
304 6195 20 033-270-49S $153.80
305 6195 21 033-270-50S $153.80
306 6195 22 033-270-51S $153.80
307 6195 23 033-270-52S $153.80
308 6195 24 033-270-53S $153.80
181
(Fiscal Year 2025-2026)

ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM NUMBER CODE LOT NO.

ASSESSOR’S

PARCEL NUMBER
TOTAL

ASSESSMENT
18 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
309 6195 25 033-270-54S $153.80
310 6195 26 033-270-55S $153.80
311 6195 27 033-270-56S $153.80
312 6195 28 033-270-57S $153.80
313 6195 29 033-270-58S $153.80
314 6195 30 033-270-59S $153.80
315 6195 1 033-250-58S $153.80
316 6195 2 033-250-59S $153.80
317 6195 3 033-250-60S $153.80
318 6195 4 033-250-61S $153.80
319 6195 31 033-250-62S $153.80
320 6195 1 033-231-55S $49.74
321 6195 2 033-231-56S $49.74
322 6195 3 033-231-57S $49.74
323 6195 21 033-233-14S $49.74
324 6195 22 033-233-15S $49.74
325 6195 23 033-233-16S $49.74
326 6195 24 033-233-17S $49.74
327 6195 25 033-233-18S $49.74
328 6195 37 033-234-34S $49.74
329 6195 38 033-234-15S $49.74
330 6195 39 033-234-16S $49.74
331 6195 40 033-234-17S $49.74
332 6195 41 033-234-18S $49.74
333 6195 42 033-234-19S $49.74
334 6195 43 033-234-20S $49.74
335 6195 44 033-234-21S $49.74
336 6195 45 033-234-22S $49.74
337 6195 46 033-234-23S $49.74
338 6195 36 033-234-24S $49.74
339 6195 35 033-234-25S $49.74
340 6195 34 033-234-26S $49.74
341 6195 33 033-234-27S $49.74
342 6195 32 033-234-28S $49.74
343 6195 31 033-234-29S $49.74
344 6195 30 033-234-30S $49.74
345 6195 29 033-234-31S $49.74
346 6195 28 033-234-36S $49.74
347 6195 26 033-233-19S $49.74
348 6195 27 033-233-20S $49.74
349 6195 20 033-233-21S $49.74
350 6195 19 033-233-22S $49.74
351 6195 18 033-233-23S $49.74
182
(Fiscal Year 2025-2026)

ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM NUMBER CODE LOT NO.

ASSESSOR’S

PARCEL NUMBER
TOTAL

ASSESSMENT
19 | Page
390.02 LLMD 2025-2026
352 6195 17 033-233-24S $49.74
353 6195 16 033-233-25S $49.74
354 6195 15 033-233-26S $49.74
355 6195 14 033-233-27S $49.74
356 6195 13 033-233-28S $49.74
357 6195 12 033-233-29S $49.74
358 6195 11 033-233-31S $49.74
359 6195 11 033-233-34S $49.74
360 6195 11 033-233-35S $49.74
361 6195 11 033-234-37S $49.74
362 6195 4 033-231-58S $49.74
363 6195 5 033-231-59S $49.74
364 6195 6 033-231-60S $49.74
365 6195 7 033-231-61S $49.74
366 6195 8 033-231-62S $49.74
367 6195 9 033-231-63S $49.74
368 6195 10 033-231-64S $49.74
183

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
184

CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN, FRESNO COUNTY

CALIFORNIA

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR
185
Mar Z/, 2025 - 3:59pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg

SAN JOAQUIN CITY WIDE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT No. 92-3
7 w
:::::,
z
w
~
O::'.
w
~ :::::,
[/)
w
:::::,
z
w
~
O::'.
w
u
::i
o_

NOTTO SCALE
City of San Joaquin -Assessment Diagram 1 of 16
Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 186
LEGEND

NOTTO SCALE
F AREA 1 OF BOUNDARIES ilSTRICT No. 92-3 ASSESSMENT

SHEET REFERENCE SHEET
~~
4 •
...
•
• ♦ .,• ♦ ♦• 15
••♦ ♦ 6 ~
~ ~ ·
••
••
'·
Diagram Index . Assessment
456
Sixth J q
Uln • · Inc. •
C
·ty of San oa . Engineering, I Gouveia Street • Gustine, California 95322 187
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg I
I
I
I
\
\
\
(DsT
1 [IJ
(DsT
2 w
G)sT
3 QJ
\

C( LORADO COURT
G)sT
I 4
I [TI
L
®s
6 w
G)s 7
11281
@s 8 Olm
@s 9
11301
@s 10
@sT DJ]
5 @s
w 11
11321
@s 12
11331
@s 22[n] 22
GD @)s
21 cm
@s
20 Cm
G)s @s @s @s @s
7 8 9 10 11
[TI []] w [IQ] DI]
@s @s
6 5
[Im 01]]
@s 16
[TI]
:5 @s 15
OJ]] ~ ;:: @s _. tl1
_J
w
OJ
<C
z
z
<C
1 4 :::c :::c ~ o en 1----c------+I ~ w @s ~~ 13
11341 -1--~-~-+1 @s 23 ~
@

FOURTH STREET
@s @s
18 19 [I[] [I[]
@s @s
12 13
[JI] [JI]

NOTTO SCALE
LEGEND
[ill]
23 BOUNDARIES OF AREA 1 OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3

ASSESSOR'S MAP PAGE BOUNDARY

ASSESSMENT DLIIGRAM NUMBER

LOT NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin - Assessment Diagram Area 1 I 3 of 1s Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 188
C~\~s~J=•~:::ta\Local\Temp\AcPublish 15480\39002-12-181 AD1 .dwg -
' G)s G)s G)s (Ds @s @)s @s @s @s ' 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 \ 11251 11241 11231 [Ill] D]JJ l150I 11491 11481 11471

THIRD STREET
@§) \
' @s \ / ' /
17 @ @s 6 @s23 @s24 24
[zQ
l
11381 w 11451 11521 D]Q]
@s @s22 @_g)s25 18 ::::J
@s23 @s 7 z 11391 w
O]JJ en s::: >
m m ► <t: [IE 11531 D]§] -I
@s19 @s22 @s 8 @s 21 ~s26 I en o
:I: :I:
<t:
[Ill] I m, 11401 m- 0
<t: m 11541 O]z] -I z >
@s 9 @s20 ~s27
wm @s20 w
@s21 z
[TI] w O]fil 1166 11731 ::::J 1142 w z - ::::J
@s19 ©s28 w @s24 @s25 @s10 z
w ~ > 11741 [El ~ ~ <t: 1165 <t I
z
@s26 @s11 @srn ~s29 O::'.

FOURTH STREET <t: 01
0 LL
11641 11751 ~ - 11571 <t: _J
> <t: w
@s17 ~s 30 @s @s u @s27 ®s12 z
17 16 ~ 11581 1163 O]]J
DI] [I[] @s28 @)s @s16 @s31 13 I ~ ~ [Ig [TI] @s @s I
@s 29 @s @s15 ®s32 14 15 14 DI] [I[] ~ [J]Q] [J]l 11781 / " - - - - I - - - - - -
City of San Joaquin - Assessment Diagram Area 1

NOTTO SCALE
LEGEND
[ill]
23 BOUNDARIES OF AREA 1 OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3

ASSESSOR'S MAP PAGE BOUNDARY

ASSESSMENT DLIIGRAM NUMBER

LOT NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
1 4 of 1s
Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854 3300 189
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg I (Ds (Ds Q)s G)s @s ®s @ @s I 1 2 3 4 5 6 Q)s 8
I 241 I 12421 12431 12441 12451 12461
7 12481
®s
9 12491
@s @s
10 11
l250I I 251 I
@s
12 12521
7 ARIZONA AVENUE
~ "_ - [ill]
~ ---=-~-----=-~-----=--~- --=--~---7
@sT @sT @sT @sT @sT @sT @sT @sT @)sT @sT @sT
25 2 4 23 22 21 20 19 1 8 1 7 1 6 1 5
12031 12021 12011 12001 [j]]] 11981 [j]1] [j]]] 11951 11941 11931 @)s27 @s
12051 12
[ill
@s '11'S 28 ~ 11
12061 [][]
G)s 2 ®s 9
ffiJ [J[]
Q)s 3 @s 8
[R] CT[]
(Ds 4 Q)s 7
cm oo
(Ds 5 ®s 6
[ill [ill
(j})s @s @s @s @sT @sT
14 8 9 10 11 12
[ill 11861 11871 11881 11891 [gQ]
@ PUNJAB AVENUE
f--
w
w
O'.'.:
f---
c.n
::r::
f--
z
z
/
@s
7 11851
@s18 @s19
[ill []§]

CALIFORNIA AVENUE
@s
4 11821
@s
3 [j]JJ
@)sT
13 [j]JJ
@s
2 11801
@sT
14 11921
@sT
1 11791
035-040-57S
[ill
,,
f--
w
w
O'.'.:
f---
c.n
z
<t:
2 l
--I
City of San Joaquin - Assessment Diagram Area 2

NOTTO SCALE
LEGEND
[j]fil
8 BOUNDARIES OF AREA 2 OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3

ASSESSOR'S MAP PAGE BOUNDARY

ASSESSMENT DLIIGRAM NUMBER

LOT NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
I s of 1s
Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 190
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg I I I
234 I
Iw @) w
I 0:::::
®s @s G)s G)s Q)s I- (Ds U) ®s @s G)s G)s 34 33 32 31 30 29 Q_ 28 27 26 25 12401 12391 12381 12371 12361 12351
w
w 12341 12331 12321 12311
0 I
I

PUNJAB STREET
I w r--
I- z II w @s @s @s @s @s @s @s @s @s -w
w (Ij)s @s @)s ...J w
~ 0::::: II
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 o en IU) 12071 12081 12091 12101 [fill 12121 12131 12141 12151 w]] 12171 12181 !;;cw :z ~~
<(
2 (231_)

I NOTTO SCALE
I
@s @s @s @s @s @s @s @s @s @s @s LEGEND
18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8
D1JJ 11201 [j]] [j]] ITTil [j]] [j]] [IT] [Ll] [ITI] [jJ] ---- BOUNDARIES OF AREA 3 OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3
[D1] ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM NUMBER
I 14 LOT NUMBER
I @ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
l CALIFORNIA STREET ® ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
- - - - - - - - - - ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin - Assessment Diagram Area 3 I 6 of 16 Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 •(209) 854-3300 191
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg I
I-
(j]s 22 12281
w
G)s (Ds w
0::::
24 23 I12301 12291
U)
@s 21 12271
z
<(
2 @s 20 12261
<(
@s 19
PUNJAB STREET 12251
w (0 i---------,-- @s 3 tu w
II
(.) Cf)
!;;cw
~~ @s
13 12191
@s
14 12201
@s
15 12211
@s
16 12221
@s ®)s
6 3
~ 11061
18 @)s
17 12231
@)s
2 11051
12241
@)s
1 11041
C)
......
"O w C: z ca - O> ...J 1-
I w (.) w !;;i:I
~ Cf)
w
w
Cf)

NOTTO SCALE
LEGEND
BOUNDARIES OF AREA 3 OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3
[jJ]] ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM NUMBER
14 LOT NUMBER

CALIFORNIA STREET
@ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin -Assessment Diagram Area 3 7 of 16
Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 192
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg

I I I I I I I
i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITWELFTH STREET LL wW
I z ...J
::::d;:
® IO
(..) ...J
I- w <( cc
~w w
(Ds (Ds G)s G)s @s ®s Q)s @s ®s en
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
[ill [][] [ill [][] cm [ill [ill [ill IBJ

I I I I I
NOTTO
~ SCALE
--- - - - - - - - - - en
m
ms: w LEGEND 0)
6j ~ z I-
-w BOUNDARIES OF AREA 3 OF 0 (") ...J w ---- < :I: II ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3 m, o en [ill :;a - !;;: w ASSESSMENT DLIIGRAM NUMBER
_z
G) m (@)s @s @s @s @s @s ~~ 6 LOT NUMBER :I: 10 -I 11 12 13 14 15 00 [ill [][] []2J []QJ [TI] ® ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
@ ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
® ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin -Assessment Diagram Area 3 I 8 of 16 Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 193
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg (Ds
35 [ill
w co I
z I-
-w I ...J w
:::c :::c
ucn n
~w

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 7
(Ds G)s
34 33
[][] [][]
I

TWELFTH STREET
I
G)s
32 [][]
@s
31 cm
I
~ s::
m )>
en -I
:::c (")
m :::c
mr
-I z ~~ ...... m NOTTO SCALE I ,---------,-------,----------r-------,--------rl 0 I f---
w
w
O'.'.

I f---
[/)
(Ds (Ds ~
I z 16 17 O'.'.
0 [ill [m LL
I _J
<(
u
I
G)s G)s @s
18 19 20
[ill [&] [Kl
LEGEND
[ill
5 BOUNDARIES OF AREA 3 OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3

ASSESSOR'S MAP PAGE BOUNDARY

ASSESSMENT DLIIGRAM NUMBER

LOT NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin -Assessment Diagram Area 3 I 9 of 16 Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 194
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg

I ' ' I
@
®s Q)s
30 29
[ill IBJ
w O')
z I-
-w
...J w
:::c :::c
Oen
~w
~~
®s Q)s 21
22 IT[] [z[]
@

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 7 I
@s ®s
28 27
[El [ill

TWELFTH STREET
@s ®s
23 24
mJ [][]
I
■
I
@)s I
26 [ill
I
I
I
@)s I
25 [ill
.I

NOTTO SCALE
LEGEND
[ill
5 BOUNDARIES OF AREA 3 OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3

ASSESSOR'S MAP PAGE BOUNDARY

ASSESSMENT DLIIGRAM NUMBER

LOT NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin -Assessment Diagram Area 3 I 10 of 16 Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 195
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg @s
2 11021

COLORADO AVENUE ----

HANFORD AND SUMMIT LAKE RAILWAY
@)s
2 12541

NOTTO SCALE
LEGEND
BOUNDARIES OF AREA 1 OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3
- - - - - ASSESSOR'S MAP PAGE BOUNDARY
[j]l] ASSESSMENT D~GRAM NUMBER
3 LOT NUMBER
@) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
@ ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin -Assessment Diagram Area 4 11 of 16 Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 196
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg I
I
"
@s
32 12881
- - ELM - -AVENUE
GJ)s @s ~~ 11 18 m ~ en a
12671 13021 ffi :::c
@)s
10 12661
mr J-~~L-~~~~-t---~------1 -I z
@s @s ~ m
12 17
12681 I 301 I

FIRST STREET
@s
16 13001
@s
15 12991

NOTTO SCALE
LEGEND
@s
24 12801
@s
26/
12821
City of San Joaquin - Assessment Diagram Area 5
~
11 BOUNDARIES OF AREA 1 OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3

ASSESSOR'S MAP PAGE BOUNDARY

ASSESSMENT DLIIGRAM NUMBER

LOT NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
12 of 16
Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 197
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg N w..-
z 1--
:J W
::c w um
~w
~w Cl)
- -
@s "
19 13031
@s 20
13041
@s 21
13051
@
- - - - 51 S
22 @s
13061 29
~ 13131 23§S L--~~~-----1
13071 @s
28 illll
@s
26 10
311
@s o><?CJ 7 s
@s -1
11 12951 @s
10 4
2 - - --

NOTTO SCALE
LEGEND
~
11 BOUNDARIES OF AREA 1 OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3

ASSESSOR'S MAP PAGE BOUNDARY

ASSESSMENT DLIIGRAM NUMBER

LOT NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
@ ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin -Assessment Diagram Area 5 13 of 16 Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 198
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg - - - - - - - - - -
@s @s 13381
/
46 13371 36
@s 45 13361 @s 35 13391
@s 44 13351 @s 34 13401
@s 43 13341 @s 33 I 341I
en s:::
~ @s 42 13331 @s 32 I 341I f--
w FR ► en '-I f-- w w 0::: :I: C") w f-- m:::I: 0::: @s 13321 234 @)s 31 13431 U) mr f-- 41 U) '-I z ~ Q_ w ..... m :z w CJ'I
<C @s 40 13311 @s 30 13441 0
NOTTO SCALE 2
@s 39 13301 @s 29 13451
LEGEND @s 38 13291
---- BOUNDARIES OF AREA 6 OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3 ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM NUMBER @s 37 13281 @s 28 13461
14 LOT NUMBER
@ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER OUTLOT "A"
® ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER - - -~
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin - Assessment Diagram Area 6 I 14ot1s Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 199
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg • - - - - - - - - - - ARIZONA STREET
@s 27 13481 @s 20 13491
@s 26 13471 @s 19 13501
@s 25 13271 @s 18 I 351I
@s 24 13261 @s 17 13521
w :::!= @s 23 13251 @s ff- (/) :s::: 16 13531 w
~ z I- w w w 0::: FR > :::::iW ~ 0::: f- ~ (/) '-I
:r:W f- @s Cf) :I: (') c..,I Cf) 22 13241 233 @s 15 13541 m:::I:

I- (/) :z mr
<( w Q_ <t: ~ w '-I z 2 ~
~ ~w w <t: ...... m
en 0 @s 21 13231 @s 14 13551 O')

NOTTO SCALE
@s 13 13561
LEGEND @)s 12 13571
BOUNDARIES OF AREA 6 OF OUTLOT "B"
---- ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3
~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM NUMBER @s 11 13581
14 LOT NUMBER
OUTLOT "c''
@ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
- - -~ ® ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin -Assessment Diagram Area 6 I 15 of 16 Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300 200
Mar Z/, 2025 - 4:00pm
C:\Users\varges\AppDeta\Local\Temp\AcPublish _ 15480\39002-12-1 B 1 _ AD1 .dwg ■
- - - - I
I
1, @s 10 13651
LO w..-
z I-
:::iW @s 9 13641
:::c w (.) :::c
I- en
<( w @)s 8 13631 ~w
en
@)s 7 13621
f- @s w
w 6 13611
~ [Y
fCf)
z @s 5 13601@)
<(
2 <( @s ~ 4 13591
NOTTO SCALE @)s 3 13221
LEGEND @s 2 13211
---- BOUNDARIES OF AREA 6 OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 92-3 @s 13201 ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM NUMBER
14 LOT NUMBER
0UTL0T "D"
@ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
- ® ASSESSOR'S BLOCK NUMBER
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NUMBER 33
City of San Joaquin -Assessment Diagram Area 6 I 16 of 16 Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 456 Sixth Street • Gustine, California 95322 • (209) 854-3300

STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL
May 27, 2025
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Elizabeth Cabrera, City Manager
SUBJECT: Council authorization to use State Water Resources Control Board Funds to enter into an Agreement with Watermill Express, LLC and establishing a policy for use of tokens to provide clean potable water to Community
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-29 Approving a Policy for the use of funds per State Budget Act of 2024 for Clean Drinking Water Dispensing Facility and Approving Agreement with Watermill Express, LLC
Executive Summary
For council consideration are an agreement with Watermill Express, LLC and a Policy that will allow the City to provide water tokens to each household on a monthly basis over the next 24 months. The water tokens can be utilized at the local Watermill Express to receive clean potable water in the interim of construction of the water treatment plants. Funds utilized were provided to the City by Assemblywoman Soria through a Budget Allocation in 2024. Tokens will be disbursed every other month commencing July 2025 and each household will receive 60 tokens/gallons (30 per month). The Agreement provides for replacing the use of tokens with technology updates which may allow for different types of payment mechanisms such as RFID card, debit card, swipe cards, other technology. The proposed resolution approves a Policy for the use of the state funds and approves an Agreement with Watermill Express, LLC.

Background
On February 4, 2025 City Council approved Resolution 2025-09 authorizing the use of funds for qualifying expenses and authorizing the City Manager to enter into a funding agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board.

Assemblywoman Soria notified the City that a State Budget Allocation in the amount of $500K was approved and would be issued to City of San Joaquin in fiscal year 2024-25 for the purpose of Clean Drinking Water Dispensing Facility and Community Center Project. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is preparing the funding allocation per the Budget Act of 2024.

The funding period is July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2027. The SWRCB will follow up prior to the end of the funding period, June 30, 2027 for confirmation that the funding was used as intended in the budget. Funds will be administered to the City on a reimbursement basis. 201
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-29

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN

APPROVING A POLICY FOR THE USE OF FUNDS PER STATE BUDGET ACT OF 2024 FOR CLEAN DRINKING WATER DISPENSING FACILITY AND APPROVING

AGREEMENT WITH WATERMILL EXPRESS, LLC
WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is providing funding to the City of San Joaquin per the Budget Act of 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Joaquin (hereafter also referenced as “City”) will receive $500,000 for Clean Drinking Water Dispensing Facility and Community Center Project; and WHEREAS, the allocation to be obligated to providing the community with clean potable water to residents is $360,000; and
WHEREAS, the funding period is July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2027; and WHEREAS, the allocation is made to the City of San Joaquin in an effort to provide clean potable water to residents in the interim of the construction of the water treatment plants; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into an agreement with Watermill Express, LLC (Vendor) to deliver clean potable water to residents for a period of 24 months commencing June 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City is establishing a Policy explaining the eligibility, use and distribution of water tokens to the community.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Joaquin as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated by reference.

2. The City Council authorizes the use of funds per Budget Act of 2024 for the qualifying expenses for Clean Drinking Water Facility Project in the amount of $360,000 by June 30, 2027.

3. The Agreement with Watermill Express, LLC attached as Exhibit A is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it.

4. The Council approves the Policy for implementing the Watermill Agreement which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated by reference.

5. This resolution is effective upon adoption.
202
The foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Joaquin the 3rd day of June 2025 and passed at said meeting the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Adam Flores-Cornejo, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Matthew Flood, City Clerk
203

EXHIBIT A

AGREEMENT
204
60814668 v2

AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

THE CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN
AND

WATERMILL EXPRESS, LLC
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), dated and entered into June _3__, 2025 ("Effective Date"), is by and between the City of San Joaquin, a municipal corporation of the State of California (“City”), and Watermill Express, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Watermill”).

RECITALS
A. City has received state funding to install and construct new infrastructure intended to provide potable water (i.e., drinking water) access to its residents.

B. Until such time as City has completed the installation and construction of such new infrastructure, City desires to make potable water available to its residents.

C. Watermill owns and operates a self-fill water station ("Water Station") within the City of San Joaquin that vends potable water to paying customers.

D. The Water Station can accept certain tokens ("Tokens") in lieu of cash as payment for potable water.

E. After review and consideration, City desires to purchase Tokens from Watermill to distribute free of charge to City residents in order for such residents to purchase potable water from the Water Station, and Watermill desires to sell Tokens to City for such purpose, upon this Agreement's terms and conditions.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties incorporate the foregoing recitals and agree as follows:

1. Purchase and Sale of Tokens.

1.1 General. As more specifically addressed in Section 1.3 of this Agreement, Watermill will sell a total of seven hundred twenty thousand (720,000) Tokens to City during this Agreement's term, and City will purchase a total of seven hundred twenty thousand (720,000) Tokens from Watermill during this Agreement's term, upon this Agreement's terms and conditions.

1.2 Purchase Price. The purchase price for each token will be fifty cents ($0.50). The total purchase price for all Tokens will be three hundred sixty thousand dollars ($360,000.00).

1.3 Token Quantities and Delivery Dates. The City will purchase the Tokens from Watermill on the dates and in the quantities specified as follows:

Docusign Envelope ID: 3E808AB1-8B0F-401F-B010-F25D83A41967 205
60814668 v2
(a) On each of June 16, 2025, August 1, 2025, October 1, 2025, December 1, 2025, and February 1, 2026, April 1, 2026, June 1, 2026, August 1, 2026, October 1, 2026, December 1, 2026, February 1, 2027, and April 1, 2027, City will purchase sixty thousand (60,000) Tokens from Watermill (a total of 720,000 Tokens).

1.4 Token Deliveries and Invoicing.
(a) Prior to each of the delivery dates contemplated in Section 1.3 of this Agreement, Watermill will invoice City (c/o the City Manager) for all Tokens to be delivered on each such delivery date. City will pay each such invoice by check made payable to Watermill in advance of Watermill delivering the Tokens to City.
(b) Contingent upon Watermill's receipt of payment for a delivery date, Watermill will deliver (or cause to be delivered) to the City Manager or the Assistant City Manager at San Joaquin City Hall the applicable quantity of Tokens for which City has paid Watermill.

1.5 Token Distribution. City will be solely responsible for distributing all Tokens to City residents, and Watermill will have no responsibility or liability for distributing any Tokens to City residents.

1.6 Token Use. Tokens may be used only for purchasing potable water from the Water Station. Neither City nor City's residents may (i) return Tokens to Watermill for any reason or (ii) redeem or exchange Tokens for cash, any cash equivalent, or any other consideration, item, or property.

1.7 Incorrect Quantities and Defective Tokens.
(a) If Watermill delivers to City an incorrect quantity of Tokens, the sole liability of Watermill to City, and the sole relief and remedy to which City will be entitled from Watermill, will be for Watermill to provide City the difference between the quantity of Tokens supposed to have been delivered on the applicable delivery date and the quantity of Tokens actually delivered on such date.
(b) As used in this Agreement, the term "defective Token" means a manufacturing flaw that makes the Token unusable for its intended purpose (i.e., purchasing potable water from the Water Station), which flaw is not due, in whole or in part, to an act or omission of any person or entity other than the Token's manufacturer. If Watermill delivers to City any quantity of defective Tokens, the sole liability of Watermill to City, and the sole relief and remedy to which City will be entitled from Watermill, will be for Watermill to provide City with a quantity of non-defective Tokens equal to the quantity of defective Tokens.

2. Effective Date and Term of Agreement.

2.1 Effective Date. This Agreement is effective and in full force and effect on the Effective Date.

Docusign Envelope ID: 3E808AB1-8B0F-401F-B010-F25D83A41967 206
60814668 v2

2.2 Term of Agreement. This Agreement's term will commence on June 4, 2025, and will continue in full force and effect for a period of twenty-four (24) consecutive months through June 3, 2027, unless terminated earlier by one of the parties pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement

3. Independent Contractor. In performing its obligations under this Agreement, Watermill is acting as an independent contractor of City and not as an employee, agent, partner, joint venturer, or fiduciary of City. At all times during this Agreement's term, Watermill or any agent or employee of Watermill shall be deemed at all times to be an independent contractor and is wholly responsible for the manner in which it performs its obligations under this Agreement. Watermill, its agents, and employees will not represent or hold themselves out to be employees of City at any time.

Watermill or any agent or employee of Watermill shall not have employee status with City and will not be entitled to participate in any plans, arrangements, or distributions by City pertaining to, or in connection with, any retirement, health or other benefits that City may offer its employees.

Watermill shall be responsible for all taxes assessable or payable on the compensation City will pay to Watermill under this Agreement. Any terms in this Agreement referring to direction from City shall be construed as providing for direction as to policy and the result of Watermill’s work only, and not as to the means by which such a result is obtained. City does not retain the right to control the means or the method by which Watermill performs its obligations under this Agreement

4. Insurance and Indemnity.

4.1 Indemnification. Watermill shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, its officers, and employees from any and all liabilities, judgments, or damages, including reasonable legal counsels’ fees and costs of litigation (“Liabilities”), actually incurred by City specifically due to Watermill’s breach of this Agreement, except for Liabilities to the extent arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of City or any third party.

4.2 Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Watermill shall maintain, keep in force and pay all premiums required to maintain and keep in force liability and property damage insurance. The limits of such policy shall be as required by City. A copy of City’s requirements for such insurance coverage is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

5. Termination.

5.1 Termination for Breach. Either party (the "Notifying Party") may terminate this Agreement with immediate effect by delivering written notice to the other party (the "Breaching Party") if the Breaching Party has breached a material term of this Agreement and, following written notice of such breach from the Notifying Party, the Breaching Party fails or refuses to cure such breach within thirty (30) days following such notice's date; provided, that, if the breach is incapable of being cured within such thirty (30) day period and the Breaching Party has commenced efforts to cure such breach and is diligently attempting to cure such breach within such thirty (30) day period, the Notifying Party may only terminate this Agreement if the Breaching Party fails or refuses to continue diligently attempting to cure such breach within and following such thirty (30) day period.

Docusign Envelope ID: 3E808AB1-8B0F-401F-B010-F25D83A41967 207
60814668 v2

5.2 Termination for Convenience. Either party to this Agreement may terminate this Agreement for its convenience by delivering thirty (30) days' prior written notice of termination to the other party.

5.3 Termination upon Term Expiration. This Agreement will terminate automatically and without additional action of the parties at 11:59:59 PM Pacific Time on the final day of this Agreement's term.

6. Notices. All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered by (i) personally delivery to the recipient party, (ii) registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or by a national courier service, and properly addressed to the recipient party, as follows:

If to City: City of San Joaquin
Attn: City Manager
P.O. Box 758
San Joaquin, CA 93660
If to Watermill: Watermill Express, LLC
1177 South 4th Avenue
Brighton, CO 80601
Attn: Leasing
Any such notice shall be deemed delivered (i) if by personal delivery, on the date delivered, (ii) if by registered or certified mail, on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused, as the case may be, or (iii) if by national courier service, on the date delivered as confirmed by the national courier service.

7. Compliance with Laws / Public Records Act.

7.1 Compliance with Laws. Watermill (i) will comply with all federal, state, and local laws applicable to Watermill's performance of its obligations under this Agreement and (ii) has and will keep in effect during the term of this Agreement all licenses (including, but not limited to, the City San Joaquin business license), permits, and approval of whatever nature, which licenses are legally required to perform Watermill’s obligations under this Agreement.

7.2 Public Records Act. Watermill acknowledges that this Agreement and all records related to its formation, Watermill’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement, and City’s payments to Watermill under this Agreement are subject to the California Public Records Act, (California Government Code §6250 et seq.). Such records are subject to public inspection and copying unless exempt from disclosure under federal, state, or local law.

Docusign Envelope ID: 3E808AB1-8B0F-401F-B010-F25D83A41967 208
60814668 v2

8. TECHNOLOGY UPDATES. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, (i) Watermill may at any time replace the Water Station with one or more new or different self-fill water stations that vend potable water ("New Water Stations), (ii) such New Water Stations will not be required to accept Tokens as payment, and (iii) such New Water Stations may accept new and different type payment mechanisms than the Water Station including, without limitation, prepaid RFID cards, debit cards, swipe cards, or other prepaid card technologies. If a New Water Station does not accept Tokens as payment, the parties will cooperate with each other in good faith to promptly amend this Agreement so that the Agreement (i) contemplates the new type payment mechanism of the New Water Station and (ii) requires Watermill to deliver to City the same value equivalent of the new payment mechanism as the value equivalent of the Tokens Watermill is required to deliver to City under this Agreement (for the same amounts payable by the City to Watermill under this Agreement) (iii) City may collect tokens and Water Station will replace with other method.

9. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

9.1 Assignment. Neither City nor Watermill will assign this Agreement or its interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other.

9.2 Entire Agreement / Amendments. This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding and agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous oral or written understandings and agreements between the parties regarding its subject matter. Any changes to this Agreement requested by either City or Watermill may only be affected if mutually agreed upon in writing by duly authorized representatives of the parties hereto.

9.3 Attorney’s Fees. In the event that any action is brought to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the non-prevailing party in such action will pay the prevailing party's reasonable attorney’s fees in connection with such action in an amount to be fixed by the court overseeing such action.

9.4 Governing Law; Validity; Venue. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement, including the interpretation of the Agreement. If any part of the Agreement is adjudged to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity shall not affect this Agreement as a whole or the full force and effect of any other provision or the remainder of the Agreement. Venue for all litigation relative to the formation, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be in the County of Fresno, California.

9.5 Waiver. In no event shall any payment by City or acceptance of payment by Watermill constitute a waiver by such party of any breach of this Agreement on the part of the other party. Neither shall such payment impair or prejudice any remedy available to either party with respect to such breach. Any waiver of any obligation or liability under this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the waiving party. In the event that either party waives any breach of this Agreement, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Agreement, whether of the same or any other term, condition, or obligation.

Docusign Envelope ID: 3E808AB1-8B0F-401F-B010-F25D83A41967 209
60814668 v2

9.6 Severability. Should the application of any provision of this Agreement to any particular facts or circumstances be found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then (a) the validity of other provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected or impaired thereby, and (b) such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent possible so as to the effect the intent of the parties and shall be reformed without further action by the parties to the extent necessary to make such provision valid and enforceable.

9.7 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. This Agreement shall be effective upon full execution by both parties and the formal approval by the governing body of City. In case of any conflict, the counterpart maintained by City shall be deemed to be determinative.

9.8 Force Majeure / Warranty Disclaimer / Limitation of Liability. (a) Watermill will not be in breach of this Agreement and will have no liability to City for breaching an obligation under this Agreement if such breach is due in whole or in part an act or circumstance beyond Watermill's reasonable control including, without limitation, the following: an act of God (including earthquake, fire, flood, tornado, or hurricane); an act of a third party; insurrection, military action, terrorist act, or war; a viral, bacterial, or other outbreak, epidemic, or pandemic; or a lock-out, strike, walk-out, or other labor or industrial shortage or disturbance. As used in this subsection, an "act of God" means the intervention of an extraordinary, violent, and destructive natural agent, which, by its very nature, raises a presumption that no human means could resist its effect. (b) Watermill makes no and disclaims all express and implied representations and warranties relating to the Tokens and the Water Station including, without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement. (c) Watermill will have no liability to City under this Agreement or otherwise arising out of, or relating to, the operability or inoperability of the Water Station. The total liability of Watermill under this Agreement shall not exceed (i) the actual amount City shall have paid Watermill under this Agreement on the date the liability shall arise and (ii) three hundred sixty thousand dollars ($360,000.00) (i.e., the total purchase price for all Tokens to be sold and purchased under this Agreement) in total. Neither party will have any liability to the other party arising out of, or relating to, this Agreement, whether arising in contract, tort, warranty, or other legal theory or source, for incidental, consequential, punitive, or other special damages.

9.9 Interpretation. As used in this Agreement, the words "herein," "hereto," "hereby," and "hereunder" refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular section, subsection, or other portion of this Agreement; the term "party" means either City or Watermill, as the context requires; and the term "parties" means, collectively, City and Watermill. (Remainder of page left blank intentionally. Signatures on following page.) Docusign Envelope ID: 3E808AB1-8B0F-401F-B010-F25D83A41967 210
60814668 v2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement.

City of San Joaquin
__________________________________
Elizabeth Cabrera, City Manager
Date: ____________________________
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Matt Flood, City Clerk
Watermill Express, LLC
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Docusign Envelope ID: 3E808AB1-8B0F-401F-B010-F25D83A41967 5/16/2025
Chief Development Officer
Heath Weidert
211

Page 8 of 9 ends

San Joaquin City CouncilJune 3, 2025

San Joaquin City Council
June 3, 2025