Cities Index.
Attachments

San Jose City Council
March 1, 2022

Document
Attachments
Meeting
March 1, 2022
Body
San Jose City Council
Original file
424 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

ATTACHMENT B
2021 Park Condition Assessment Scores by Park and Civic Ground

Council District Park Name 2020 2021
1 Calabazas Branch Library 3.9 97%
1 Calabazas Park 3.1 67%
1 Cypress Community Center 3.5 87%
1 Frank M. Santana Park 3.5 92%
1 Gleason Park 4 100%
1 Gullo Park 4 100%
1 Hathaway Park 3.9 85%
1 John Mise Park 4 73%
1 Marijane Hamann Park 3.2 89%
1 Murdock Park 3.1 79%
1 Rainbow Park 2.8 54%
1 San Tomas Park 3.5 91%
1 Saratoga Creek Park 3.8 80%
1 Starbird Park 3.2 83%
1 West Valley Branch Library 4.5 100%
2 Basking Ridge Park 3.8 94%
2 Charlotte Commons 4 90%
2 Chynoweth Park 3.5 78%
2 Coy Park 3.5 95%
2 Danna Rock Park 3.4 81%
2 Edenvale Branch Library 3.9 100%
2 Edenvale Garden Park 3.3 97%
2 Edenvale Community Center 4.1 100%
2 Great Oaks Park 3.3 80%
2 Meadows Park 2.8 78%
2 Melody Park 3.9 77%
2 Metcalf Park 3.1 96%
2 Miner Park 3.8 99%
2 Palmia Park 3.2 91%
2 Parkview I Park 3.1 82%
2 Parkview II Park 3.5 88%
2 Parkview III Park 3.5 95%
2 Piercy Park 3.5 95%
2 Raleigh Park 3.5 87%
2 Ramac Park 4 86%
2 Santa Teresa Branch Library 4 100%
2 Shady Oaks Park 3.1 89%
2 Silver Leaf Park 3.7 86%
2 Southside Community Center 3.8 88%
2 Southside Police Substation 3.7 100%
2 Vista Park 3.7 89%
2 Waterford Park 3.6 97%
3 Backesto Park 2.8 83%
3 Bestor Art Park 3.7 89%

ATTACHMENT B
2021 Park Condition Assessment Scores by Park and Civic Ground

Council District Park Name 2020 2021
3 Biblioteca Latinoamericana Branch Library 4 100%
3 Bonita Park 3.7 96%
3 Brenda Lopez Memorial Plaza 4.2 97%
3 Cannery Park 4.8 100%
3 City Hall Plaza 3.7 94%
3 East San Jose Carnegie Branch Library 4.1 95%
3 Environmental Innovation Center 4.4 96%
3 Fallon House 4.3 100%
3 Forestdale Tot Lot 4.2 79%
3 Gran Paradiso Park 3.8 96%
3 Guadalupe River Park - Discovery Meadow 2.2 89%
3 Hacienda Creek Park 3.9 80%
3 John P. McEnery Park 3.4 99%
3 Joyce Ellington Branch Library 3.4 100%
3 Luna Park 3.5 99%
3 Martin Park 2.7 73%
3 Jacinto Siquig Northside Community Center 3.4 100%
3 O'Donnell's Gardens Park 4.5 89%
3 Orchard Park 4.3 100%
3 Parque de los Pobladores 4.4 100%
3 Parque de Padre Mateo Sheedy 3.1 88%
3 Pellier Park 5 100%
3 Peralta Adobe 5 100%
3 Plaza de Cesar Chavez 2.7 94%
3 Raymond Bernal Jr. Memorial Park 2.9 88%
3 Roosevelt Park 2.8 72%
3 Ryland Dog Park 3.6 96%
3 Ryland Park 3.4 100%
3 Selma Olinder Park 2.5 47%
3 St. James Park 3.5 82%
3 Tamien Park 4.6 92%
3 Townsend Park 3.1 81%
3 Washington United Youth Center 3.6 92%
3 Watson Park 4.1 79%
3 William Street Park 3.4 83%
4 Alum Rock Park 3.4 79%
4 Alviso Community Policing Center 3.9 100%
4 Alviso Library & Community Center 3.4 74%
4 Alviso Park 3 81%
4 Alviso Youth Center 3.4 81%
4 Berryessa Branch Library 3.4 78%
4 Berryessa Community Center 3.4 67%
4 Berryessa Creek Park 3.8 85%
4 Brooktree Park 3.7 82%

ATTACHMENT B
2021 Park Condition Assessment Scores by Park and Civic Ground

Council District Park Name 2020 2021
4 Cataldi Park 3.5 79%
4 Commodore Park 4.1 80%
4 Educational Park Branch Library 2.7 69%
4 Flickinger Park 3.3 78%
4 Iris Chang Park 4.1 95%
4 Moitozo Park 4.9 98%
4 Noble House 3.8 95%
4 Noble Park 3.5 71%
4 Northwood Park 3.4 67%
4 Old Alviso Community Center 3.5 61%
4 Penitencia Creek Park 3.5 67%
4 River Oaks Park 3.9 92%
4 Riverview Park 4.8 87%
4 Vinci Park 3.7 90%
4 Vista Montana (1 acre) 4.6 98%
4 Vista Montana (5 acre) 3.5 52%
5 Alum Rock Youth Center 3.5 93%
5 Capitol Park 3.7 73%
5 Children of the Rainbow Park 3.7 89%
5 Cimarron Park 3.6 73%
5 Dr. Roberto Cruz - Alum Rock Branch Library 3.4 100%
5 Emma Prusch Farm Park 3.8 82%
5 Esther Medina Park 3.8 64%
5 Fleming Park 4.1 98%
5 Hank Lopez Community Center 2.8 95%
5 Hillview Park 3.1 95%
5 LoBue Park 3.2 67%
5 Madden Park 4 98%
5 Mayfair Park 3.4 40%
5 Mt. Pleasant Park 3.5 88%
5 Nancy Lane Plaza 2.7 52%
5 Hillview Branch Library 3.4 100%
5 Our Park 3.3 92%
5 Overfelt Gardens 2.8 54%
5 P.A.L. Stadium Park 3.9 78%
5 Parque de la Amistad 3.3 92%
5 Plata Arroyo Park 3.3 76%
5 San Antonio Tot Lot 3.9 97%
5 Sheppard Sports Field 3.6 97%
5 Sylvia Cassell Park 3.2 70%
5 Zolezzi Park 3.4 89%
6 Bascom Community Center and Library 3.8 100%
6 Biebrach Park 3 96%
6 Buena Vista Park 4 99%

ATTACHMENT B
2021 Park Condition Assessment Scores by Park and Civic Ground

Council District Park Name 2020 2021
6 Cahill Park 2.8 88%
6 Columbus Park 2.1 9%
6 Del Monte Park 4 84%
6 Discovery Dog Park 2.3 84%
6 Fuller Avenue Park 3.3 93%
6 Gardner Community Center 3.4 96%
6 Gregory Tot Lot 3.9 99%
6 Guadalupe Gardens 2.9 45%
6 Guadalupe Gardens - Heritage Rose Garden 2.9 91%
6 Guadalupe River Park - Arena Green (East) 2.9 90%
6 Guadalupe River Park - Arena Green (West) 3 98%
6 Guadalupe Gardens - Courtyard Garden 1.9 71%
6 Guadalupe Gardens - Historic Orchard 3 100%
6 Hester Park 3 92%
6 Hummingbird Park 4.6 100%
6 Lincoln Glen Park 3.8 96%
6 Municipal Rose Garden 3.4 90%
6 Newhall Park 4.4 95%
6 O'Connor Park 3.5 97%
6 Rincon South Park * 98%
6 River Glen Park 2.7 100%
6 Rose Garden Branch Library 3.9 100%
6 Rosemary Gardens Park 3.6 82%
6 Roy Avenue Park 3.5 88%
6 St. Elizabeth Park 4.4 97%
6 Theodore Lenzen Park 4.4 100%
6 Wallenberg Park 3.2 100%
6 Wilcox Park 4.2 100%
6 Willow Glen Branch Library 4.8 100%
6 Willow Glen Community and Senior Center 3.4 96%
6 Willow Street Frank Bramhall Park 3.2 77%
7 Alma Community Center 3.5 81%
7 Bellevue Park 3.8 91%
7 Communications Hill - Stairway 4 93%
7 Fair Swim Center and Tot Lot 3.4 85%
7 Kelley Park 3.3 90%
7 Kelley Park - Happy Hollow Park and Zoo 3.9 97%
7 Kelley Park - Japanese Friendship Garden 3.4 95%
7 Kelley Park - San Jose History Park 3.8 100%
7 Kelley Park - Vietnamese Heritage Garden 2 95%
7 La Ragione Tot Lot 3.2 100%
7 Lone Bluff Park 3.4 93%
7 McLaughlin Park 3.7 96%
7 Nisich Park 4.1 91%

ATTACHMENT B
2021 Park Condition Assessment Scores by Park and Civic Ground

Council District Park Name 2020 2021
7 Ramblewood Park 3.5 80%
7 Richardson Park 4 88%
7 Roberto Antonio Balermino Park 4.1 91%
7 Rocksprings Park 3.8 78%
7 San Jose Animal Care Center 3.7 100%
7 Seven Trees Community Center 3 62%
7 Shirakawa Community Center 3 86%
7 Solari Park 3.3 94%
7 Stonegate Park 3.1 92%
7 Tully Community Ballfields 3.2 75%
7 Tully Community Branch Library 3.5 73%
7 Turtle Rock Park 3.3 85%
7 Vieira Park 3.3 90%
7 Vieira Park Overlook 3.9 90%
7 West Evergreen Park 3.6 77%
7 William Manly Park 4 97%
7 Windmill Springs Park 3.8 87%
8 Aborn Park 3.2 100%
8 Arcadia Ballpark 4.8 100%
8 Boggini Park 2.9 97%
8 Boys and Girls Club (Smythe Field) 1.3 0%
8 Brigadoon Park 3.5 94%
8 Brigadoon Tot Lot 3.5 91%
8 Canyon Creek Park 3.7 87%
8 Dove Hill Park 3.7 89%
8 Evergreen Branch Library 3.5 98%
8 Evergreen Communtiy Center 3.9 93%
8 Evergreen Park 3.7 93%
8 Falls Creek Park 4 98%
8 Fernish Park 4 87%
8 Fowler Creek Park 3.6 90%
8 Groesbeck Hill Park 2.9 100%
8 Lake Cunningham Park 2.8 93%
8 Meadowfair Community Center 3.9 96%
8 Meadowfair Park 3.4 83%
8 Metzger Ranch 3.8 92%
8 Montgomery Hill Park 4 100%
8 Norwood Creek Park 3 93%
8 Silver Creek Linear Park 3.9 84%
8 Silver Creek Linear Park - Picnic Meadow 3.7 84%
8 Village Square Branch Library 3.8 100%
8 Welch Park 3.3 96%
9 Branham Park 2.9 90%
9 Butcher Park 2.2 80%

ATTACHMENT B
2021 Park Condition Assessment Scores by Park and Civic Ground

Council District Park Name 2020 2021
9 Cambrian Branch Library 3.3 81%
9 Camden Park and Community Center 3.1 80%
9 Canoas Park 2.8 94%
9 Carolyn Norris Park 3.3 75%
9 De Anza Park 3.1 87%
9 Doerr Park 2.8 81%
9 Erikson Park 3.5 64%
9 Houge Park 2.7 85%
9 Kirk Park 2.8 83%
9 Lone Hill Park 2.9 75%
9 Paul Moore Park 3 88%
9 Pearl Ave Branch Library 3.6 100%
9 Richard E Huerta Park 2.7 81%
9 Rubino Park 2.5 81%
9 Russo Park 3.6 88%
9 Scottsdale Park 3.7 94%
9 Terrell Park 2.9 88%
9 Thousand Oaks Park 3.4 89%
9 William Cilker Park 3.2 96%
10 Almaden Community Center and Library 3 73%
10 Almaden Lake Park 3.3 97%
10 Almaden Meadows Park 3.1 75%
10 Almaden Winery Park 3.4 92%
10 Avenida Espana Park 3.9 97%
10 Cahalan Park 3.7 90%
10 Calero Park 3.8 83%
10 Carrabelle Park 3.6 86%
10 Cathedral Oaks Park 4 100%
10 Century Oaks Park 4 100%
10 Chris Hotts Park 3 87%
10 Comanche Park 3.5 81%
10 Foothill Park 3.6 100%
10 George Page Park 3.3 79%
10 Glenview Park 3.6 97%
10 Greystone Park 3.7 77%
10 Guadalupe Oak Grove Park 3.3 91%
10 Jeffery Fontana Park 2.9 80%
10 La Colina Park 3.4 73%
10 Los Paseos Park 3.6 61%
10 Miyuki Dog Park 3.2 93%
10 Patty O'Malley Sports Fields 4.5 97%
10 Parma Park 3.4 80%
10 Pfeiffer Park 3.7 96%
10 Playa del Rey Park 3.4 94%

ATTACHMENT B
2021 Park Condition Assessment Scores by Park and Civic Ground

Council District Park Name 2020 2021
10 T.J. Martin Park 3 77%
10 Vineland Branch Library 3.4 94%
* New park in 2020
Attachment C- 2021 Park Condition Assessment Analyses87% City-wide PCA Average260 Parks and Civic Grounds Assessed20 Parks Amenities Measured - 20 40 60 80 100 120 140<10%10-20%20-30%30-40%40-50%50-60%60-70%70-80%80-90%90-100%Number of Parks and Civic Grounds by PCA Score0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%HardscapeParking LotsBike ParksUndeveloped Areas Within ParklandExercise Stations/Par-coursesWater ManagementAthletic CourtsBenchesPlantingDeveloped Unirrigated LandWaste ReceptaclesTreesPlaygroundsDog ParksSkate ParksRestroomsPicnic AreasDrinking FountainsAthletic FieldsTurf (Natural)Average Score of Amenities Council District1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Average PCA Score85% 90% 90% 81% 82% 89% 88% 90% 85% 87% High Impact: Staff observes that there are long established encampments, Medium Impact: Staff observes that there may be some established encampments, but not long term. Some litter left over and damage to turf.

Low Impact: Staff observes that there are one or multiple people who sleep in the park, but are gone in the morning and leave no trace.

No Impact: Staff observe that the park is not impacted by the unhoused population.0%20%40%60%80%100%No Impact Low Impact Medium Impact High ImpactAverage PCA ScoreAverage PCA Score by Level of Staff Observed Unhoused Impact 0123456789101 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Number of ParksNumber of Parks Highly Impacted by the Unhoused Population by Council District Attachment C- 2021 Park Condition Assessment Analyses0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%Staff Maintained SitesContract SiteComparing Contracted Sites and Staff Maintained Sites

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100Average PCA Score by Healthy Place Index Percentile

← All documents from this meeting