Cities Index.
Conflicts of Interest Memorandum

San Jose City Council
March 8, 2022

Document
Conflicts of Interest Memorandum
Meeting
March 8, 2022
Body
San Jose City Council
Pages
2
Original file
171 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

T-24298/1895548.docx
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND

CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Nora Frimann
City Attorney
SUBJECT: Conflicts Review - Parks &
Recreation Commission
Applicant
DATE: February 8, 2022

BACKGROUND
This Office routinely reviews applications to City Boards and Commissions. The applications generally do not provide complete information regarding potential conflicts; however, they do occasionally disclose potential conflicts of interest or incompatible offices. The purpose of this memorandum is to highlight areas of potential conflict which are disclosed by the application. In order to analyze potential conflicts, it is necessary to consider the duties of the particular commission for which the applicant is seeking appointment. This review is limited to the information provided on the applications and is not intended to be comprehensive investigation of potential conflicts involving the applicants.

COMMISSION DUTIES
The Parks and Recreation Commission’s duties include studies, reviews, evaluation, and making recommendations to the City Council regarding the City’s Parks and Recreation programs. The Parks program includes the location, design, and maintenance of parks and other recreation facilities. The Recreation programs include adult sports and youth, senior and special population activities. If an applicant lives in proximity to the park or recreational facility, there may be occasions when he or she may have to abstain from participation in matters before the Commission that concern the particular facility. We have no way of evaluating this situation in advance – City staff would need to evaluate the location of the project and the commissioner’s residence on a case-by-case basis.

LEGAL CONFLICTS THAT MAY PRECLUDE VOTE OR PARTICIPATION Certain positions may preclude a commissioner from participating in a commission discussion or from voting if a matter involving the entity comes before the commission.

While this list is not complete, these types of conflicts generally fall within one or more of the following situations:
• An application shows entities that are “sources of income” to a potential commissioner within the 12 months preceding the start of the commission term, as defined under the Political Reform Act.

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
February 8, 2022
Subject: Parks & Recreation Commission Applicant

Page 2 ends

T-24298/1895548.docx
• An application shows sources of income to a spouse or domestic partner of a potential commissioner within the 12 months preceding the start of the commission term. • An applicant or the spouse or domestic partner of an applicant is an officer or board member of an entity and it is foreseeable that the entity could be involved in a matter coming before the commission.

APPEARANCE OF BIAS
There may be facts which would not amount to a legal conflict of interest requiring a commissioner to recuse him or herself from a commission vote or discussion but the relationship could create an appearance of bias on the part of the commissioner. City Council policy requires commissions to be free from bias in their decision making and may require a commissioner to recuse him or herself if the facts could reasonably lead one to conclude that the applicant would be biased for or against an entity or entities.

REVIEW OF APPLICANT
The application from the applicant listed below was reviewed by our office. Unless otherwise indicated, no application discloses incompatible offices or apparent conflicts of interest that would substantially impair the functioning of the commission.

Nooran Bayzaie – Mr. Bayzaei is a is a full-time student at West Valley College who is not currently employed. His previous employment was as a Financial Solutions Adviser with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Mr. Bayzaei’s application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.

CONCLUSION
You may wish to consider the above comments in making your recommendation on appointment to the Commission.

NORA FRIMANN
City Attorney
By /s/ Aaron Yu

AARON YU
Deputy City Attorney
cc: Jennifer Maguire, City Manager
Toni J. Taber, CMC, City Clerk

← All documents from this meeting