Cities Index.
Early Consideration Response Form

San Jose City Council
June 21, 2022

Document
Early Consideration Response Form
Meeting
June 21, 2022
Body
San Jose City Council
Pages
3
Original file
221 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Council Policy Prioritization: Early Consideration Response Form DKƉƉƌŽǀĂů͗ͺͺͺͺ/s/ Lee WilcoxͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺĂƚĞͺ5/31/22ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

Page 1 ends

Department Rules Date Item
Department Rep. Name/Ext. Council Member Sponsorship
Policy/Ordinance Subject
Staff Recommendation
܆GREEN Adopt based on tradeoffs
outlined on next page
܆YELLOWZĞĨĞƌ to Priority^ĞƚƚŝŶŐ
ŽƌƚŽƵĚŐĞƚ Process
܆RED Recommend Council not
adopt nominated idea

܆NEEDS CLARIFICATION OR

MORE TIME TO EVALUATE
Staff Evaluation
/ƐƚŚŝƐĂligned with City Roadmap?
܆Yes܆No
/ƐƚŚŝƐĂlready underway inĂ
DepĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ work plan?
܆Yes܆No
/ƐƚŚŝƐƚime Đritical orĂŶ Ğmergency?
܆Yes܆No
tŝůůƚŚŝƐƌequire substantialƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕
staffing͕ budget͕ŽƌƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ?
܆Yes܆No
Criterion to Determine Scale of Project Complexity
Project complexity is determined by scoring the project in each of the 3 criterions below and then summing the score. a. Low Complexity is a sum of 6 or less.
b. Medium Complexity is a sum of 7 – 9.
c. High Complexity is a sum of 10 or greater.

Total Score =
Scoring Criterion
Low Complexity Medium Complexity High Complexity
Estimated Duration 6 – 9 months ܆1 9 - 18 months ܆2 More than 18 months ܆3 Organizational
Complexity
(Internal)
Can Easily be Absorbed
into Existing Work Plan
܆1 Planned Work (Future) ܆2 Work Not Currently Proposed ܆3 Have staff with required
skillset/knowledge
܆1 Have staff with required skillset/
requires moderate research
܆2 Do not have staff with required
skillsetͬrequires significant
research
܆3
Less than or equal 2
staff required
܆1 3 - 4 staff required ܆2 More than 5 staff required ܆3 (External) 1 Additional
Department
܆1 2 Other DepartmentƐ Involved ܆2 3 or more DepĂƌƚŵĞŶƚs Involved ܆3 DEPT.

Required
܆Airport܆Auditor܆CMO܆OED/CA܆ESD܆Fire܆HR܆IT܆PRNS܆Police܆Retirement ܆Attorney܆Clerk܆CMO –
Budget
܆Community
Energy܆Finance܆Housing܆IPA܆Library܆PBCE܆PW܆DOT
܆CMOʹ
ŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ
܆DKʹ
CMO-Employee Relations / Police Department Rules Date 6/1/22 C1 Jennifer Schembri, x58154 / Chief Mata
Investigation Principles Police, Administrative Leave Policy Related SJPD Duty Manual and IA Guidelines
Mayor
✔
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
6 OER

Page 2 ends

Analysis
Explain the rationale for staff recommendation, including any mitigating factors that need to be considered (recent legislative action, significant work plan changes, etc.). Please address the following as well.

GREEN LIGHT: The Administration can implement this Nominated Idea under its current work plan. Item should be sent to Council to add to Department work plan. ;ϭͿ,ŽǁǁŝůůƚŚĞ/ĚĞĂďĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĞĚ͍;ϮͿ If adopted͕ what isŝƚƐ impactĂŶĚͬŽƌtradeoff toƚŚĞ City Roadmap or ƚŽĂDepĂƌtŵĞŶƚ work plan͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ? ;ϯͿWhat is the minimum viable scope to moveƚŚĞ/ĚĞĂ forward and reduceŝƚƐ complexity? YELLOW LIGHT: The Administration recommends Council send this Nominated Idea to the Priority Setting Process due to (describe cost implications, workload impacts, or other factors).

RED LIGHT: The Administration recommends Council not adopt this Nominated Idea due to (describe reason implementation would be difficult if not impossible – conflict with other laws, etc.).

The changes are currently underway and will be implemented soon.

Page 3 ends

Analysis (Continued)

← All documents from this meeting