Cities Index.
The Public Record

Joint Meeting for the Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole
August 17, 2022

Document
The Public Record
Meeting
August 17, 2022
Body
Joint Meeting for the Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole
Original file
459 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

RULES COMMITTEE: 08/17/2022
Item: B.1
File ID: ROGC 22-345
TO: Honorable Mayor & FROM: Toni J. Taber, CMC
City Council City Clerk
SUBJECT: The Public Record DATE: August 17, 2022
August 4 – August 11, 2022

ITEMS FILED FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD
Letters from Boards, Commissions, and Committees
Letters from the Public

1. Letter from Ruth Silver-Taube, dated August 9, 2022, regarding: Letter Re: San Jose Wage Theft Policy.
____________________________
Toni J. Taber, CMC
City Clerk
TJT/tt
8/11/22, 7:57 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important FW: Letter Re: San Jose Wage Theft Policy
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Wed 8/10/2022 1:15 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Cc: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
1 attachments (172 KB)
LettertoSJCityCounciReWageTheftPolicyAugust2022_3.docx; From: Ruth Silver-Taube < >
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2022 11:12 PM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; Jones, Chappie <[email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Peralez, Raul <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Carrasco, Magdalena <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Esparza, Maya <[email protected]>; Arenas, Sylvia <[email protected]>; Foley, Pam <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]> Subject: Letter Re: San Jose Wage Theft Policy
Mayor Liccardo, Vice Mayor Jones, and Councilmembers:

Attached please find a letter regarding the San Jose Wage Theft Policy.

Best,
Ruth
Ruth Silver Taube
Coordinator
Santa Clara County Wage Theft Coalition
Public Record: 1
h

August 9, 2022
Mayor Liccardo, Vice Mayor Jones, and Councilmembers:

Over 6 years ago, on May 24, 2016, the San Jose City Council enacted a Wage Theft Policy with an effective date of July 1, 2016. The policy requires that bidders disclose wage theft judgments and disqualification if the potential contractor has been found by a court or final administrative action of an investigatory government agency to have violated wage and hour laws on more than one occasion or has one unpaid wage judgment in the past five years prior to the date of submission of the bid. We are grateful to the City Council for enacting this policy.

In the over six years that the policy has been in effect, there was only one isolated incident where all the bidders were disqualified because they were in violation of the Wage Theft Policy. This situation was unique because the bidders were limited to the small number of banks who could handle the City’s billion-dollar budget. The issue was quickly resolved with a vote by the City Council to grant an exception.

We now understand that the Office of Equality Assurance is considering an amendment to the Ordinance to address a hypothetical situation where no bidder meets the requirements of the Wage Theft Policy. This is a solution in search of a problem since the existing Wage Theft Policy has worked well for over 6 years with only one unique instance that was quickly resolved by a vote of the Council granting an exception. The old adage “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” is applicable in this case. In the unlikely event that all the bidders are disqualified, the City Council can again grant an exception.

The Wage Theft Policy was adopted with unanimous support from the Council. At the time, the Office of Equality Assurance took the position that it did not need to apply to public works. In the past six years, it has become clear that this omission was untenable because the Labor Commission is beset by staffing shortages and staggering caseloads that preclude timely and effective enforcement. The Office of Equality Assurance has informed us that it will propose that the public works exemption be removed. We support this proposal.

We urge the City Council to leave the Wage Theft Policy as is with the exception of the removal of the public works exemption.

Sincerely,
Ruth Silver Taube, Santa Clara County Wage Theft Coalition David Bini, Santa Clara & San Benito Building & Construction Trades Council Jean Cohen, South Bay AFL-CIO Labor Council
Louise Auerhahn, Working Partnerships USA
María Marroquín, Day Worker Center of Mountain View
Richard Konda, Asian Law Alliance
Adriana Garcia, Maíz
Felwina Opiso-Mondina, PAWIS

← All documents from this meeting