San Jose City Council
August 23, 2022

1. The policy establishes the thresholds for transportation impacts under the CEQA based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) instead of levels of service (LOS). The intent of this change is to shift the focus of transportation analysis under CEQA from vehicle delay and roadway auto capacity to a reduction in vehicle emissions, and the creation of robust multimodal networks that support integrated land uses. The new transportation policy aligns with the currently adopted General Plan which seeks to focus new development growth within Planned Growth Areas, bringing together office, residential, and supporting service land uses to internalize trips and reduce VMT. All new development projects are required to analyze transportation impacts using the VMT metric and conform to Council Policy 5-1.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 160 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
Regional/Local
Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the transportation planning, coordinating, and financing agency for the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area, including Santa Clara County.

MTC is charged with regularly updating the Regional Transportation Plan, a comprehensive blueprint for the development of mass transit, highway, airport, seaport, railroad, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities in the region. MTC and the Association of Bay Area Governments adopted Plan Bay Area 2040 in July 2017, which includes the region’s Sustainable Communities Strategy (integrating transportation, land use, and housing to meet GHG reduction targets set by CARB) and Regional Transportation Plan (including a regional transportation investment strategy for revenues from federal, state, regional and local sources over the next 24 years).

I-280/Winchester Boulevard Transportation Development Policy The project is located within the Winchester Boulevard Urban Village Plan (2017). As part of the Envision San José 2040 General Plan, the City has identified historically underutilized locations within San José that will be developed as “Urban Villages.” These urban villages are intended to promote the development of active, walkable, bicycle friendly, transit-oriented, mixed-use urban settings for new housing and job growth. The I-280/Winchester Boulevard interchange area Transportation Development Policy (TDP), adopted in September 2016, provides for additional capacity in the immediate area of the I-880/Stevens Creek Boulevard and I-280/Winchester Boulevard interchanges. The TDP provides partial funding, via a traffic impact fee imposed on proposed development, for the implementation of a new westbound offramp from I-280 to Winchester Boulevard to reduce traffic congestion at the I-880/Stevens Creek and Stevens Creek Boulevard corridors. The proposed project’s trip generation can be found in “Non-CEQA Effects” at the end of this section of the initial study.

Congestion Management Program
In accordance with California Statute, Government Code Section 65088, Santa Clara County has established a Congestion Management Program (CMP). The intent of the CMP legislation is to develop a comprehensive transportation improvement program among local jurisdictions that will reduce traffic congestion and improve land use decision-making and air quality. VTA serves as the Congestion Management Agency for Santa Clara County and maintains the county’s CMP.

Congestion management agencies are required by the state statute to monitor roadway traffic congestion and the impact of land use and transportation decisions on a countywide level, at least every two years. VTA conducts CMP monitoring and produces the CMP Monitoring & Conformance Report annually for freeways, rural highways, and CMP-designated intersections.

Legislation requires that each CMP contain the following five mandatory elements: 1) a system definition and traffic level of service standard element; 2) a transit service and standards element; 3) a trip reduction and transportation demand management element; 4) a land use impact analysis program element; and 5) a capital improvement element. The Santa Clara County CMP includes the five mandatory elements and three other elements: a county-wide transportation model and data Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 161 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
base element, an annual monitoring and conformance element, and a deficiency plan element. The VTA has review responsibility for proposed development projects expected to affect CMP designated intersections. According to the County’s CMP Figure 2.3, there are several CMP designated intersections near to the project site.

Envision San José 2040 General Plan
Chapter 6, Land Use and Transportation, of the City’s General Plan includes the Circulation Element, which defines a set of balanced, long-range, multi-modal transportation goals and policies that provide for a safe, efficient, and sustainable transportation network. The following polices related to transportation are germane to the proposed project:

Policy TR-1.1 Accommodate and encourage use of non-automobile transportation modes to achieve San José’s mobility goals and reduce vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled (VMT).

Policy TR-1.2 Consider impacts on overall mobility and all travel modes when evaluating transportation impacts of new developments or infrastructure projects.

Policy TR-1.4 Through the entitlement process for new development fund needed transportation improvements for all transportation modes, giving first consideration to improvement of bicycling, walking and transit facilities. Encourage investments that reduce vehicle travel demand.

Policy TR-1.5 Design, construct, operate, and maintain public streets to enable safe, comfortable, and attractive access and travel for motorists and for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users of all ages, abilities, and preferences.

Policy TR-1.6 Require that public street improvements provide safe access for motorists and pedestrians along development frontages per current City design standards.

PolicyTR-2.8 Require new development where feasible to provide on-site facilities such as bicycle storage and showers, provide connections to existing and planned facilities, dedicate land to expand existing facilities or provide new facilities such as sidewalks and/or bicycle lanes/paths, or share in the cost of improvements.

Policy TR-3.3 As part of the development review process, require that new development along existing and planned transit facilities consist of land use and development types and intensities that contribute towards transit ridership. In addition, require that new development is designed to accommodate and to provide direct access to transit facilities.

Policy TR-9.1 Enhance, expand and maintain facilities for walking and bicycling, particularly to connect with and ensure access to transit and to provide a safe and complete alternative transportation network that facilitates non-automobile trips.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 162 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
City Council Policy 5-1
With the adoption of SB 743 legislation, public agencies are now required to base the determination of transportation impacts on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) rather than level of service. In adherence to SB 743, the City has adopted a new Transportation Analysis Policy, Council Policy 5-

1. The policy establishes the thresholds for transportation impacts under the CEQA based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) instead of levels of service (LOS). The intent of this change is to shift the focus of transportation analysis under CEQA from vehicle delay and roadway auto capacity to a reduction in vehicle emissions, and the creation of robust multimodal networks that support integrated land uses. The new transportation policy aligns with the currently adopted General Plan which seeks to focus new development growth within Planned Growth Areas, bringing together office, residential, and supporting service land uses to internalize trips and reduce VMT. All new development projects are required to analyze transportation impacts using the VMT metric and conform to Council Policy 5-1.

Screening criteria have been established to determine which projects require a detailed VMT analysis. If a project meets the relevant screening criteria, it is considered to a have a less than significant VMT impact. The VMT policy does not negate Area Development policies (ADPs) and Transportation Development policies (TDPs) approved prior to adoption of Policy 5-1. Policy 5-1 does, however, 3896 Stevens Creek Boulevard 144 Draft EIR City of San José August 2020 negate the City’s Protected Intersection policy. Under Policy 5-1, the screening criteria are:
 Small Infill Projects;
 Local-Serving Retail;
 Local-Serving Public Facilities;
 Transit Supportive Projects in Planned Growth Areas with Low VMT and High-Quality Transit;
 Restricted Affordable, Transit Supportive Residential Projects in Planned Growth Areas with High Quality Transit; and Transportation Projects that reduce or do not increase VMT.

4.17.4 Impact Discussion
a) Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? (Less Than Significant)
Project Trip Generation
The transportation analysis estimates, with trip reductions, that the project would generate a total of 1,266 daily vehicle trips, with 64 trips (37 inbound and 27 outbound) occurring during the AM peak hour and 75 trips (37 inbound and 38 outbound) occurring during the PM peak hour.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 163 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
Intersection Operations
The following intersections were reviewed and analyzed for the transportation analysis:
 Winchester Boulevard and Williams Road;
 Winchester Boulevard and Payne Avenue;
 Winchester Boulevard and David Avenue/Williamsburg Drive;  Winchester Boulevard and Hamilton Avenue; and
 Winchester Boulevard and Fireside Drive (unsignalized).

The signalized intersection of Winchester Boulevard and Hamilton Avenue is located within the City of Campbell. However, it is also a congestion management plan designated intersection and, therefore, is subject to congestion management plan LOS standards.

The transportation analysis determined that the study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service at buildout of the proposed project (Hexagon Transportation Consultants 2020, p. 43). In addition, the transportation analysis indicates that the intersections of Winchester Boulevard/David Avenue/Williamsburg Drive and Winchester Boulevard/Payne Avenue with the addition of project traffic causes the overall average intersection delays to improve slightly; this occurs when project trips are added to movements where the delay is lower than the overall intersection average (p. 43).

I-280/Winchester Boulevard Interchange Area Transportation Development Policy This Policy provides partial funding, via a traffic impact fee imposed on proposed development, for the implementation of a new westbound off-ramp from I-280 to Winchester Boulevard to reduce traffic congestion at the I-880/Stevens Creek and Stevens Creek Boulevard corridors. The traffic fee is based on the estimated trips to be added to the new westbound off-ramp from I-280 to Winchester Boulevard by each individual development. It is estimated that the proposed project would result in the addition of four PM peak hour trips to the planned I-280 to Winchester Boulevard ramp.

Pedestrian Facilities
Existing sidewalks along Winchester Boulevard provide a pedestrian connection between the project site and pedestrian destinations in the project vicinity. Crosswalks with pedestrian signal heads are located at the signalized intersection of Winchester Boulevard and Payne Avenue. All of the roadways in the vicinity of the project site have sidewalks on both sides of the street, except a short segment on the east side of Winchester Boulevard along the frontages of the project site and one adjacent property to the north. The project would install a 20-foot sidewalk along its frontage on Winchester Boulevard. However, in order to close the sidewalk gap on the east side of Winchester Boulevard, it is recommended that the City staff work with the owner of the adjacent property to the north to install a sidewalk per City design standards.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 164 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
Bicycle Facilities
The bikeways within the vicinity of the project site would remain unchanged under project conditions. Currently, no bike facilities exist on Winchester Boulevard between Payne Avenue and Moorpark Avenue that would provide connections to other bicycle facilities in the project vicinity.

The Envision 2040 General Plan identifies the following goals in regard to bicycling and pedestrians:
 Provide a continuous pedestrian and bicycle system to enhance connectivity throughout the City by completing missing segments.
 Build pedestrian and bicycle improvements at the same time as improvements for vehicular circulation.
 Give priority to pedestrian improvement projects that improve pedestrian safety, improve pedestrian access to and within the Urban Villages and other growth areas.

The San Jose Bike Plan 2020 indicates that a variety of bicycle facilities are planned in the study area, some of which would benefit the project and adhere to the goals of the Envision 2040 General Plan. Of the planned facilities, the following are relevant to, and won’t be conflicted by, the project.

Class II bike lanes are planned for:
 Winchester Boulevard, between Payne Avenue and Moorpark Avenue; and  Cypress Avenue, between Williams Road and Moorpark Avenue.

Class III bike routes are planned for:
 Payne Avenue, between Winchester Boulevard and Greenbriar Avenue;  Greenbriar Avenue, between Payne Avenue and Westfield Avenue; and  Westfield Avenue, between Greenbriar Avenue and Daniel Way.

Transit Services
The project site is adequately served by the existing VTA transit services. The nearest bus stops to the project site are located near the Winchester Boulevard/Payne Avenue intersection approximately 400 feet from the project site and are served by Route 60. The new transit trips generated by the project are not expected to create demand in excess of the transit service that is currently provided.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 165 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
The Envision 2040 General Plan identifies the following goals in regard to public transit:
 Pursue development of BRT, bus, shuttle, and fixed guideway services on designated streets and connections to major destinations.
 Ensure that roadways designated as Grand Boulevards adequately accommodate transit vehicle circulation and transit stops. Prioritize bus mobility along Stevens Creek Boulevard.

Winchester Boulevard between Moorpark Avenue and Impala Drive has been designated as a Grand Boulevard within the Envision 2040 General Plan. Grand Boulevards are intended to serve as major transportation corridors with priority given to public transit. In addition, as a Grand Boulevard it is envisioned that Winchester Boulevard could potentially be included in the VTA Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System. However, there are no plans at this time for a BRT line on Winchester Boulevard.

Freeway Segment Evaluation
Pursuant to the congestion management plan technical guidelines, freeway segment level of service analysis shall be conducted on all segments to which the project is projected to add one percent or more to the segment capacity. Since the project is not projected to add one percent or higher to any freeway segments in the area, freeway analysis for the congestion management plan was not required.

Winchester Complete Street Improvements. The Urban Village Plan identifies the following complete street improvements along Winchester Boulevard:
 Protected bike lanes along both sides of Winchester Boulevard. The bike lanes shall be physically separated from vehicle travel lanes.
 At least four vehicular travel lanes and two flex lanes for vehicle travel or parking.  Construction of a raised median with limited breaks.
 In order to close the sidewalk gap on the east side of Winchester Boulevard, it is recommended that the City staff work with the owner of the adjacent property to the north to install a sidewalk per City design standards.
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
(Less than Significant)
The City has adopted a Council Policy 5-1 that is based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and establishes the current thresholds for transportation impacts under CEQA based on VMT rather than intersection level of service (also known as LOS). The policy has pipeline provisions (under the Applicability of the Policy) that state only development projects with a complete application on file with the City on or after the effective date are required to comply with Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 166 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
Council Policy 5-1. The proposed project is subject to Policy 5-1 and, therefore, the transportation analysis was prepared to provide the project-level VMT analysis.

The City’s VMT Evaluation Tool is limited to the evaluation of four general land use categories: residential, office, industrial, and retail. Thus, the use of the VMT evaluation tool for the evaluation of land uses other than the four general land uses described above, such as the proposed hotel, requires the conversion of the proposed land use to an equivalent amount (based on trip generation characteristics) of residential units, office space, industrial space, or retail space (Hexagon Transportation Consultants 2020). Since the characteristics of the proposed hotel would have similar trip generating characteristics to retail space, the proposed hotel was converted into an equivalent amount of retail space.

If a project meets the City’s screening criteria, the project is expected to result in less-thansignificant VMT impacts and a detailed CEQA VMT analysis is not required (Hexagon Transportation Consultants 2020, p. ii). The transportation analysis determined that the proposed project is estimated to generate 1,455 daily trips, which is equivalent to the trips estimated to be generated by approximately 38,000 square feet of retail space. Pursuant to San Jose’s VMT screening criteria, retail projects of 100,000 square feet or less are considered local-serving (p. 21). Therefore, the proposed project does not require a detailed CEQA VMT analysis and is expected to result in a less-than-significant VMT impact. c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (No Impact)
During the development review process, the vehicle circulation on the project site is reviewed by City staff to ensure site access is not hazardous and complies with the City’s regulations and policies.

The transportation analysis determined that the vehicles exiting the project site driveway on South Winchester Boulevard would be able to see approaching traffic on northbound South Winchester Boulevard at least to Payne Avenue located approximately 450 feet to the south.

Therefore, the transportation analysis concludes that the project driveway on South Winchester Boulevard would meet the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials minimum stopping sight distance standards (p. 48). The transportation analysis also recommends visible and/or audible warning signals at the garage entrances to alert pedestrians and bicyclists of vehicles exiting the parking garage.
d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? (No Impact)
The project includes a Fire Layout Plan (Sheet C5.0), which includes the project’s requirement for compliance with the California Fire Code. The project proposes to install all fire department access, fire water service, and fire hydrant in accordance with the California Fire Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 167 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
Code and all other applicable standards. Emergency vehicle access to the project site can be found via South Winchester Boulevard. The proposed project includes aerial access for fire apparatus vehicles at project frontage on South Winchester Boulevard, 29.2 feet from the proposed building (California Fire Code requires a distance between 15 to 30 feet).

Final plans would be reviewed by the City to ensure that the project adheres to all California Fire Code requirements. Therefore, the project would not result in inadequate emergency access.

Non-CEQA Effects
Parking Supply
Based on the City’s parking code requirements, the project would need to provide a total of 129 off-street parking spaces. The project site’s location within the Winchester Boulevard Urban Village Plan allows for a 20 percent reduction for vehicle parking with the implementation of a transportation demand management plan. Therefore, the required parking for the project site would be reduce to 104 spaces. The project proposes a total of 67 parking spaces, which is a 52 percent reduction from the City’s standard parking requirements. In accordance with Sections 20.70.330 and 20.90.220 of the San José Code of Ordinances, which allows up to a 50 percent parking reduction, the additional 32 percent reduction could be allowed with the implementation and maintenance of a transportation demand management plan.

Transportation Demand Management Plan
The proposed project includes a transportation demand management plan (located in Appendix I of this initial study), which includes measures to be implemented by the project.

These measures are briefly discussed under Section 3.0, Project Description, of this initial study, and are intended to encourage hotel guests and employees to utilize alternative transportation modes available in the area to reduce single occupancy vehicle trips and parking demand generated by the project. Implementation of the measures outlined in the project’s transportation demand management plan would help the project meet its additional 32 percent reduction for parking spaces onsite.

Surrounding On-Street Parking
The project site is located just outside the perimeter of the Cadillac Residential Parking Program zone, where a permit is required to use on-street parking from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM every day except on holidays. In order to obtain a parking permit, the applicant must live in or own a residential property or operate a business in a parking permit zone. Generally, this means that the residence or business must be located on the same side of the street and block face where permit parking signs are posted. The locations of on-street parking, where a Residential Parking Program permit is required, are shown on Figure 19 of the transportation analysis. With the implementation of the required transportation demand management plan, the Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 168 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
project will provide adequate parking spaces onsite to satisfy its parking demand and would not have an effect on the Cadillac Residential Parking Program.

Guest and Valet Drop-off/Pick-up Zone Operations
The project proposes to provide an on-street drop-off and pick-up zone along its frontage on Winchester Boulevard, north of the site driveway. There is currently no on-street parking provided along the project frontage. In addition, the planned complete street improvement of Winchester Boulevard would provide two travel lanes with a Class IV bike lane and no onstreet parking along the project frontage. Also, since the guest/valet drop-off/pick-up area will be located on a public street, the area will not be restricted to the use of only the hotel and may not be available for guest/valet use at all times. This loading zone on Winchester Boulevard, however, is not supported by the City and would need to be removed in the future when the planned bike lane improvements are implemented along Winchester Boulevard. The project proponent should consider loading/valet operations taking place within the parking garage, if possible.

Based on the estimated trip generation, a maximum of 37 inbound trips would need to be served at the proposed guest and valet drop-off/pick-up zone along Winchester Boulevard during the PM peak-hour, or approximately one vehicle every 1.5 minutes. The number of vehicles that can be served at the valet drop-off/pick-up zone will depend on the proposed valet parking operations. However, it is recommended that a minimum of two to three valet staff be present during the peak arrival/departure periods for the hotel. In addition, vehicles should not be retrieved in advance of guests being present at the valet area. Given the limited storage space for valet operations along Winchester Boulevard, the valet area should not be used for transportation network companies (TMCs) such as Uber, Lyft, etc. while waiting for customers.

The site plan does not indicate on-site designated parking spaces for guest check-in or valet drop-off/ pick-up areas. The site should provide time restricted parking spaces on-site for guest check-in and a valet drop-off/pick-up area that can accommodate the storing of at least two vehicles.

Twenty-four two car mechanical parking lifts will be provided within the basement parking level. The parking lifts would extend outward onto the drive aisle while parking or retrieving a vehicle from the upper level of the lift. Parking and retrieving vehicles from the mechanical parking lifts would momentarily interfere with vehicular circulation as most of the drive aisle would be blocked by the extended lift. However, all parking operations will be operated by valets who will be familiar with the operations of stacker parking lifts. The project should work with City staff to ensure that specific requirements for the valet operations and mechanical lifts are met.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 169 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

4.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

4.18.1 Tribal Cultural Resources Environmental Checklist Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Checklist
Source(s)
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined
in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either
a site, feature, place, or cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of the size and
scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object
with cultural value to a California Native
American tribe, and that is:

1. Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources code section 5020.1(k), or
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ 1,2,3

2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in
its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying
the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American
tribe.
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ 1,2,3

4.18.2 Setting
As of July 1, 2015, California Assembly Bill 52 of 2014 (AB 52) was enacted and expands CEQA by defining a new resource category, “tribal cultural resources.” AB 52 establishes that “A project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment” (PRC Section 21084.2).

It further states that the lead agency shall establish measures to avoid impacts that would alter the significant characteristics of a tribal cultural resource, when feasible (PRC Section 21084.3).

PRC Section 21074 (a)(1)(A) and (B) defines tribal cultural resources as “sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe” and is:

1. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 170 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying these criteria, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

AB 52 also establishes a formal consultation process for California tribes regarding those resources.

The consultation process must be completed before a CEQA document can be certified. Under AB 52, lead agencies are required to “begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project.” Native American tribes to be included in the process are those that have requested notice of projects proposed within the jurisdiction of the lead agency.

At the time of preparation of this Initial Study, no Native American tribes that are or have been traditionally culturally affiliated with the project vicinity have requested notification from the City of San José except for projects within the Coyote Valley (approximately 22 miles southeast of the site) or in downtown San José (approximately five miles northeast of the site). Due to the distance of the project site from Coyote Valley and the Downtown Core, the project would not have a significant impact on tribal cultural resources.

Tribal Cultural Resource (PRC § 20173, 21074, 21080.3.1 and 21084.3). For purposes of CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21073 and 21074 define “California Native American tribe” and “tribal cultural resources.” A California Native American tribe is defined as a Native American tribe located in California that is on the contact list maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission.
(a) Tribal cultural resources are defined as:

1. Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following:
a. Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources.
b. Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1.

2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.
(b) A cultural landscape that meets the criteria of subdivision (a) is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. (c) A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as defined in subdivision (g) of Section 21083.2, or a “nonunique archaeological resource” as defined in Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 171 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
subdivision (h) of Section 21083.2 may also be a tribal cultural resource if it conforms with the criteria of subdivision (a).

Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 provides guidance for tribal consultation. Specifically, prior to the public release of a CEQA document, the lead agency must consult with any California Native American tribe if: (1) the California Native American tribe has submitted a written request to be informed by the lead agency through formal notification of proposed projects in the geographic area that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribe; and (2) the California Native American tribe provides a written response requesting consultation within 30 days of receipt of the formal notification.

The Native American Heritage Commission would help the lead agency identify California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area. Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice. The written notice would include a brief description of the proposed project, project location, lead agency contact information, and a 30-day notice for the California Native American tribe to request consultation.

The tribal consultation process must begin within 30 days of receiving the written consultation request from the California Native American tribe.

4.18.3 Impact Discussion
1) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code 21074 that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources code section 5020.1(k)? 2) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code 21074 that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1?
(Less than Significant)
In 2017, the City sent a letter to tribal representatives in the area to welcome participation in consultation process for all ongoing, proposed, or future projects within the City’s Sphere of Influence or specific areas of the City. No tribes have sent written requests for notification of projects to the City of San José. In addition, at the time of preparation of this initial study, the City did not receive any requests for consultation from tribes. The proposed project is on a previously disturbed property in an urban setting. While there is always the potential for unknown Tribal Cultural resources or human remains to be present in the project area, impacts would be less than significant with implementation of the City’s standard permit conditions related to discovery of archaeological resources or human remains (refer back to Section 4.5, Cultural Resources).

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 172 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

4.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

4.19.1 Utilities and Services Environmental Checklist
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Checklist
Source(s)
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction
of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment,
storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas,
or telecommunications facilities, the construction
or relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ 1,2,3,5,
11,21,
22,23,
24,60
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ 1,3,11
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ 1,3
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment
of solid waste reduction goals?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ 1,3,24,
25,26,
27,28,
29 e) Comply with federal, state, and local management
and reduction statutes and regulations related to
solid waste?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ 1,3,24,
25,26,
27,28,
29 4.19.2 Environmental Setting
Water Service
The project site is currently served by the San José Water Company. Water resources in San José are managed by the Santa Clara Valley Water District (Valley Water), which receives its water supply from several locations including local groundwater, local surface water, and imported treated water. In addition, there is a fourth and growing source of supply, non-potable recycled water. On average, groundwater from the major water-bearing aquifers of the Santa Clara Subbasin comprise one-third of San José Water’s potable water supply. These aquifers are naturally recharged by rainfall and streams and artificially recharged by recharge ponds operated by San José Water. San José Water’s source of potable water is from surface water in the local watersheds of the Santa Cruz Mountains. This surface water is sent to the water company’s Montevina Filter Plant for treatment prior to entering the distribution system (San José Water Company 2016, p. 3-2).

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 173 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
According to the San Jose Water Company 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (urban water management plan), water supply (inclusive of imported water, groundwater, and surface water) availability will increase from 35,369 million gallons per year in 2015 to approximately 55,213 million gallons in 2040 (San José Water Company 2016, Table 4-3). Table 7-2 of the urban water management plan indicates that the water company anticipates adequate water supply through 2040 under average water year conditions (p.7-5). Under a single-dry year, water supplies are sufficient to meet demands through 2035, with year 2040 resulting in a demand of 3,118 million gallons more than what the supply is (p. 7-5). Over a multiple dry year supply and demand comparison, it appears that there would be sufficient water supplies under the first year, but the water demands in the second and third year would not be adequately supplied (San José Water Company 2016, Table 7-4).

To account for potential water shortages under severe drought conditions, San José Water has adopted a Water Shortage Contingency Plan, which requires a staged water reduction process. The Water Shortage Contingency Plan also includes prohibitions on end uses, which would further reduce water usage (San José Water Company 2016).

Wastewater/Sanitary Sewer System
San José Water does not own or operate any wastewater treatment facilities. All sewage generated within the San José Water’s service area is provided to the San José/Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility via the City and West Valley Sanitation District collection systems (San José Water Company 2016, p. 6-3).

The City’s Department of Environmental Services administers and operates the San José/ Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility (wastewater facility), which provides primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment of wastewater. After tertiary treatment, approximately 80 percent of the treated water is piped to the outfall channel, which then flows to Artesian Slough, through Coyote Creek, and eventually into the South San Francisco Bay. The remaining 20 percent of treated water is sent to the adjacent South Bay Water Recycling pump station to be used to irrigate crops, parks, schools, etc. (City of San José 2019).

The wastewater facility treats an average of 110 million gallons of wastewater per day (mgd) (City of San José 2019), with a capacity of up to 167 mgd (City of San José 2013). As a result, there is an existing available capacity of 57 mgd. According to the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant Master Plan, projections indicate that population growth will lead to an increase in wastewater flows to 172 mgd by 2040, which would require modifications to the wastewater facility and to the wastewater facility’s NPDES permit (p. 15).

According to the project plans (Sheet C3.0), the project would connect to the existing six-inch sanitary sewer line located within South Winchester Boulevard.

Storm Drainage
The City’s storm drain system is an underground collection system consists of approximately 1,250 miles of reinforced concrete pipes varying in size from 12 to 144 inches in diameter that function by gravity to carry untreated storm water to local creeks and rivers. Collected storm water runoff is Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 174 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
discharged to the creeks and rivers via storm outfall structures. The creeks and rivers, in turn, flow to the San Francisco Bay. According to the project plans (Sheet C3.0), project site drains to the existing 15-inch storm drain line located in South Winchester Boulevard.

Solid Waste
Republic Services provides solid waste collection services to all businesses in the City; therefore, Republic Services will serve the project site (Republic Services 2020). According to CalRecycle, the landfills that serve San José include Guadalupe Sanitary, Kirby Canyon, and Newby Island; each with a remaining capacity of 11,055,000 cubic yards; 16,191,600 cubic yards; and 21,200,000 cubic yards, respectively (CalRecycle 2020). Through an agreement with International Disposal Corporation of California (IDC), municipal solid waste generated in the City of San José that is not diverted through recycling or composting must go to Newby Island Landfill. However, Citycertified construction and demolition recycling facilities can be used during the construction phase.

Other Utilities
It is assumed that gas and electric utilities are currently provided by PG&E to the project site.

4.19.3 Regulatory Setting
Federal
Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 258 (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCRA, Subtitle D) contains regulations for municipal solid waste landfills and requires states to implement their own permitting programs incorporating the Federal landfill criteria. The Federal regulations address the location, operation, design, groundwater monitoring, and closure of landfills.

State
Assembly Bill 1826 (2014)
AB 1826 sets forth the requirements of the statewide mandatory commercial organics recycling program for businesses and multi-family dwelling with five or more units that generate four or more (two or more by December 31, 2020) cubic yards of commercial solid waste per week. AB 1826 sets a statewide goal for 50 percent reduction in organic waste disposal by the year 2020.

Senate Bill 1383
This bill would require the state board, no later than January 1, 2018, to approve and begin implementing that comprehensive strategy to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants to achieve a reduction in methane by 40%, hydrofluorocarbon gases by 40%, and anthropogenic black carbon by 50% below 2013 levels by 2030, as specified. The bill also would establish specified targets for reducing organic waste in landfills.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 175 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
This bill would require the state board, the Public Utilities Commission, and the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to undertake various actions related to reducing short-lived climate pollutants in the state. The bill would require state agencies to consider and, as appropriate, adopt policies and incentives to significantly increase the sustainable production and use of renewable gas.

California Integrated Waste Management Regulations (AB 939, AB 341, and SB 1016) To minimize the amount of solid waste that must be disposed of, the State Legislature passed the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, effective January 1990. Under AB 939, all cities and counties were required to divert at least 50 percent of solid waste from landfill facilities by the year 2000 and every year thereafter. This act also requires every city and county to report to CalRecycle annually and requires jurisdictions to begin planning for new landfills when the jurisdiction’s primary disposal site reaches its 15-year capacity.

In 2008, Senate Bill 1016 was passed, which builds on AB 939 compliance requirements by implementing a streamlined measure of jurisdictions' performance. SB 1016 accomplishes this by focusing on a disposal-based indicator rather than diversion rates. The per capita disposal rate utilizes two factors: a jurisdiction's residents/employees and its disposal amount as reported by disposal facilities. Thus, rather than mandating a 50 percent or more diversion of solid waste, SB 1016 requires a 50 percent or less disposal rate of solid waste per capita. In 2012, the California legislature sought to further reduce solid waste disposal rates through AB 341, which set a goal of 75 percent recycling, composting, or source reduction of solid waste statewide by 2020. AB 341 also requires businesses that generate four or more cubic yards of waste per week and multi-family complexes of five or more units, to implement recycling programs.

CalRecycle
The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, also known as CalRecycle, is a department within the California Environmental Protection Agency. CalRecycle administers and provides oversight for all of California’s state-managed waste handling and recycling programs.

Known mostly for overseeing beverage container and electronic-waste recycling, CalRecycle is also responsible for organics management, used tires, used motor oil, carpet, paint, mattresses, rigid plastic containers, plastic film wrap, newsprint, construction and demolition debris, medical sharps waste, household hazardous waste, and food-scrap composting. In addition to these duties CalRecycle also provides training and support for agencies that regulate and inspect California’s solid waste facilities including active landfills, materials recovery facilities, solid waste transfer stations, and compost facilities.

Regional Water Quality Control Board.

The State Water Resources Control Board and the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards are responsible for assuring implementation and compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. The state board and regional boards are designated as lead agencies in implementing the Clean Water Act and Porter-Cologne Water Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 176 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
Quality Control Act. The City is within the jurisdiction of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. Refer back to Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, Regulatory subsection for more information on the regional board.

Title 22 of California Code of Regulations
Title 22 regulates the use of reclaimed wastewater. In most cases only disinfected tertiary water may be used on food crops where the recycled water would come into contact with the edible portion of the crop. Disinfected secondary treatment may be used for food crops where the edible portion is produced above ground and will not come into contact with the secondary effluent. Lesser levels of treatment are required for other types of crops, such as orchards, vineyards, and fiber crops.

Standards are also prescribed for the use of treated wastewater for irrigation of parks, playgrounds, and landscaping.

California Green Building Standards Code
In January 2010, the State adopted the California Green Building Standards Code (“CALGreen”) establishing mandatory green building standards for all buildings in California. The code covers five categories: planning and design, energy efficiency, water efficiency and conservation, material conservation and resources efficiency, and indoor environmental quality. These standards include a mandatory set of guidelines, as well as more rigorous voluntary measures, for new construction projects to achieve specific green building performance levels:
 Reducing indoor water use by 20 percent;
 Reducing wastewater by 20 percent;
 Recycling and/or salvaging 65 percent of nonhazardous construction and demolition (“C&D”) debris, or meeting the local construction and demolition waste management ordinance, whichever is more stringent (see San Jose-specific CALGreen building code requirements in the local regulatory framework section below); and  Providing readily accessible areas for recycling by occupants.

Regional/Local
Construction and Demolition Diversion Deposit Program
The Construction and Demolition Diversion Deposit Program (CDDD) requires projects to divert at least 50% of total projected project waste to be refunded the deposit. Permit holders pay this fully refundable deposit upon application for the construction permit with the City if the project is a demolition, alteration, renovation, or a certain type of tenant improvement. The minimum project valuation for a deposit is $2000 for an alteration-renovation residential project and $5000 for a nonresidential project. There is no minimum valuation for a demolition project and no square footage limit for the deposit applicability. The deposit is fully refundable if C&D materials were reused, Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 177 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
donated, or recycled at a City-certified processing facility. Reuse and donation require acceptable documentation, such as photos, estimated weight quantities, and receipts from donations centers stating materials and quantities.

Santa Clara County Integrated Waste Management Plan
The Santa Clara County Integrated Waste Management Plan, prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 939 and more recently Senate Bill 1016, is the primary tool for waste reduction and recycling programs that are countywide in scope. This plan sets the countywide goals for reducing waste sent to landfills by 50 percent by 2000 and each year thereafter.

City’s Green Building Policy
Under the City’s Green Building Policy, all private sector and municipal building projects constructing or adding more than 10,000 square feet of occupied space (as defined in the adopting building code) are required to be designed and constructed to achieve, at a minimum, the United States Green Building Council’s (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED TM) rating system Silver-level certification with a goal of reaching LEED Gold or Platinum levels.

The City of San José requires 75 percent diversion of nonhazardous construction and demolition debris for projects that quality under CALGreen (San José Municipal Code Section 9.10.2480).

Permit holders must submit a waste management plan for the 75 percent diversion to be considered compliant.

Envision San José 2040 General Plan
Chapter 3, Environmental Leadership, in the General Plan sets forth sustainability goals for the City through 2040. The following policies are germane to the proposed project:

Policy MS-3.1 Require water-efficient landscaping, which conforms to the State’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, for all new commercial, institutional, industrial, and developer-installed residential development unless for recreation needs or other area functions.

Policy MS-3.2 Promote use of green building technology or techniques that can help reduce the depletion of the City’s potable water supply as building codes permit. For example, promote the use of captured rainwater, graywater, or recycled water as the preferred source for non-potable water needs such as irrigation and building cooling, consistent with Building Codes or other regulations.

Policy MS-3.3 Promote the use of drought tolerant plants and landscaping materials for nonresidential and residential uses.

Policy IN-3.5 Require development which will have the potential to reduce downstream LOS to lower than “D”, or development which would be served by downstream lines already operating at a LOS lower than “D”, to provide mitigation measures to improve the LOS to “D” or better, either acting independently or jointly with other developments in the same area or in coordination with the City’s Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Program.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 178 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
Policy IN-3.7 Design new projects to minimize potential damage due to stormwaters and flooding to the site and other properties.

Policy IN-3.9 Require developers to prepare drainage plans that define needed drainage improvements for proposed developments per City standards.

Policy IN-3.10 Incorporate appropriate stormwater treatment measures in development projects to achieve stormwater quality and quantity standards and objectives in compliance with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.

Policy MS-17.2 Ensure that development within San José is planned and built in a manner consistent with sustainable use of current and future water supplies by encouraging sustainable development practices, including low-impact development, water-efficient development and green building techniques. Support the location of new development within the vicinity of the recycled water system and promote expansion of the SBWR system to areas planned for new development. Residential development outside of the Urban Service Area can be approved only at minimal levels and only allowed to use non-recycled water at urban intensities. For residential development outside of the Urban Service Area, restrict water usage to well water, rainwater collection or other similar sustainable practice. Non-residential development may use the same sources and potentially make use of recycled water, provided that its use will not result in conflicts with other General Plan policies, including geologic or habitat impacts. To maximize the efficient and environmentally beneficial use of water, outside of the Urban Service Area, limit water consumption for new development so that it does not diminish the water supply available for projected development within San Jose’s urbanized areas.

Policy MS-19.1 Require new development to contribute to the cost-effective expansion of the recycled water system in proportion to the extent that it receives benefit from the development of a sustainable local water supply.

Policy MS-19.4 Require the use of recycled water wherever feasible and costeffective to serve existing and new development.

Policy IN-3.3 Meet the water supply, sanitary sewer and storm drainage level of service objectives through an orderly process of ensuring that, before development occurs, there is adequate capacity. Coordinate with water and sewer providers to prioritize service needs for approved affordable housing projects.

Policy IP-15.1 New development is required to construct and dedicate to the City all public improvements directly attributable to the site. This includes neighborhood or community parks and recreation facilities, sewer extensions, sewer laterals, street improvements, sidewalks, street lighting, fire hydrants and the like. In the implementation of the level of service policies for transportation, sanitary sewers, and neighborhood and community parks, development is required to finance improvements to nearby intersections or downstream sewer mains in which capacity would be exceeded, and dedicate land, pay an in-lieu fee or finance improvements for parks and recreation needs which would result from the development.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 179 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
Policy EC-5.7 Allow new urban development only when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project design to ensure that new urban runoff does not increase flood risks elsewhere.

Policy EC-5.11 Reduce the amount of impervious surfaces as a part of redevelopment and roadway improvements through the selection of materials, site planning, and street design where possible.

Action EC-5.16 Implement the Post-Construction Urban Runoff Management requirements of the City’s Municipal NPDES Permit to reduce urban runoff from project sites.

4.19.4 Impact Discussion
a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
(Less than Significant)
The project would incrementally increase demands on utility services. Given the small scale of the project (119 hotel guestrooms), the increase in utility demand is expected to be minor, since it represents a small fraction of the total growth identified in the City’s General Plan.

Water service to the site would be supplied by the San Jose Water Company (SJWC), a private entity that obtains water from a variety of groundwater and surface water sources. Because the project is consistent with the City’s General Plan, the growth proposed by the project and its associated water use was addressed in the General Plan EIR.

The City of San José owns and maintains the sanitary sewer drain system in the project area.

The project proposes to construct a sanitary sewer lateral that would tie into the City’s existing sewer main in South Winchester Boulevard.

As described in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the project would not significantly impact storm drainage facilities. While the project would result in an increase in the amount of impervious surfaces on the site, the resulting increase in runoff from the site would be managed and treated in accordance with City policies, which includes implementation of the stormwater control plan.

As described in Section 4.6, Energy, the project would have a less than significant impact related to natural gas and electricity use (among other energy sources). The provision/relocation of telecommunication facilities would be coordinated between the project applicant and telecommunication provider, and no significant environmental effects are anticipated as a result of this infill project.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 180 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
For the reasons presented above, the project is not expected to require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? (Less Than Significant)
The project would incrementally increase demands on utility services. Water service to the site would be supplied by SJWC, a private entity that obtains water from a variety of groundwater and surface water sources. Additionally, because the project is consistent with the City’s General Plan, the growth proposed by the project and its associated water use was addressed in the General Plan EIR.
c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? (Less than Significant)
As stated in checklist question a) above, the General Plan EIR determined that development allowed under the General Plan would not exceed the City’s allocated capacity of the wastewater facility. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan designation Neighborhood/Community Commercial; therefore, commercial development of the site has been anticipated in the City’s General Plan and evaluated in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that it has inadequate capacity to serve the proposed project’s demands in addition to its existing commitments.
d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
(Less than Significant)
Pursuant to City direction, collection activities cannot be performed in covered or below-grade locations without a prior approval from the City. Property owners will need to push solid waste collection bins outside to nearest available open street during collection days or pay haulers the premium rate for push service collection.

All commercial, residential, and City-facility generated solid waste must be disposed at Newby Island landfill, in accordance with the municipal agreement with the International Disposal Corporation of California. However, solid waste generated by proposed project during construction can be disposed of at any of the City-certified construction and demolition Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 181 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
recycling facilities. Once the project is completed, all commercial solid waste produced in San Jose is processed at a Material Recovery Facility (MRF) before they are disposed of at the landfill. According to CalRecycle, the landfill has a remaining capacity of 21,200,000 cubic yards. Anticipated closure date is 2041(CalRecycle 2020).

According to the CalRecycle’s Disposal Rate Calculator for the year 2018, the City produced

3.8 pounds of solid waste per resident per day and 9.6 pounds of solid waste per employee per day (CalRecycle 2020). The proposed project will not result an increase in population but would involve 10 employees and 119 guestrooms at full capacity. Therefore, the proposed project could generate approximately 96 pounds of employee solid waste per day (9.6 pounds per person per day x 10 employees) or 0.05 tons of employee solid waste per day, and 452.2 pounds of solid waste per resident per day (3.8 pounds per resident per day x 119 guestrooms at full capacity) or 0.23 tons of solid waste per resident per day. In total, the proposed project could generate, at full capacity, approximately 0.28 tons of solid waste per day (0.05 tons per employee per day + 0.23 tons per resident per day).

The proposed project’s contribution of 0.28 tons of solid waste per day would not exceed the landfill’s maximum permitted throughputs of 4,000 tons per day at Newby Island Landfill.

Therefore, the proposed project would not generate solid waste that would exceed landfill capacity. Further, the proposed project would be required to comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste.
e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
(Less than Significant)
Final project design would be required to comply with all federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste disposal.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 182 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

4.20 WILDFIRE

4.20.1 Wildfire Environmental Checklist
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Checklist
Source(s)
If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 1,3,62
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose
project occupants to pollutant concentrations
from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of
wildfire?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 1,3,62
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 1,3,62
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 1,3,62

4.20.2 Environmental Setting
The project site is located within an urbanized area of San José and is surrounded by existing urban development. According to the Cal Fire maps, the project site is identified as not being within a very high fire hazard zone (Cal Fire 2018).

4.20.3 Regulatory Setting
Local
Envision San José 2040 General Plan
Chapter 3 of the City’s General Plan sets forth the goal to protect lives and property from risks associated with fire-related emergencies at the urban/wildland interface. Although the project site is not located within a fire hazard area, the following policies are germane to the proposed project:

Policy EC-8.1 Minimize development in very high fire hazard zone areas. Plan and construct permitted development so as to reduce exposure to fire hazards and to facilitate fire suppression efforts in the event of a wildfire.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 183 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
Policy EC-8.2 Avoid actions which increase fire risk, such as increasing public access roads in very high fire hazard areas, because of the great environmental damage and economic loss associated with a large wildfire.

Policy EC-8.4 Require use of defensible space vegetation management best practices to protect structures at and near the urban/wildland interface.

4.20.4 Impact Discussion
a) Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, would the project exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of wildfire?
c) Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d) Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
(No Impact)
The project site is located within an urbanized area of San José and is surrounded by existing urban development. Furthermore, the project site is not within or near a very high fire hazard zone (Cal Fire 2018). Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk involving wildfires nor exacerbate the risk of wildfire.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 184 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

4.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE

4.21.1 Environmental Checklist
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Checklist
Source(s)
Would the project:
a) Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment; substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels;
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community; substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of an endangered, rare, or
threatened species; or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ 1,3,5,8,
14,49,
50 b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ 1,30,31,
32,33
c) Does the project have environmental effects,
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ 1,30,31,
32,33,
61 4.21.2 Impact Discussion
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment; substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare, or threatened species; or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
(Less Than Significant with Mitigation)
As discussed in Section 4.4 Biological Resources, special-status species are not expected to occur in areas of the City already urbanized, such as the project site. However, the nine existing trees located on the project site proposed for removal could support nesting birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would protect nesting birds and reduce the impact to a less than significant level.

Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 185 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
As described in Section 4.5 Cultural Resources, the project site does not consist of historic structures on-site and is not known to contain any historic or prehistoric resources. However, it is possible that these resources could be accidentally uncovered during grading and construction activities. In the event this should occur, standard permit conditions would ensure that the potential impacts would not be significant.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? (Less Than Significant with Mitigation)
The proposed project has the potential to result in cumulatively considerable impacts in the areas of air quality (construction-related impacts, such emissions of dust and exhaust and implementing a plan to reduce construction particulate matter exhaust emissions by at least 70 percent with implementation of the mitigation identified in Section 4.3, Air Quality). However, with the implementation of identified mitigation measures, impacts of the proposed project would not be cumulatively considerable.
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
(Less Than Significant with Mitigation)
Based on the analysis provided in this Initial Study, the proposed project could indirectly cause substantial adverse effects to human beings through exposure to TACs and noise. However, with implementation of standard permit conditions and Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and N-1, the proposed project would not result in environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 186 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
This side intentionally left blank.
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 187 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

REFERENCES

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Carpira Design Group. February 2021. Applicant Project Plans.

2. City of San José. November 2011. Envision San José 2040 General Plan. San José, CA. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/474

3. City of San José. June 2011. Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Envision San José 2040 General Plan. San José, CA.

4. City of San José. Code of Ordinances.
https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances

5. City of San José. “Public GIS Viewer.” Accessed on August 27, 2020.

6. California Department of Conservation. “California Important Farmland Finder.” Accessed on September 2, 2020. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/

7. City of San José. May 1990. Nonresidential – Commercial Design Guidelines. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?NID=1734

8. County of Santa Clara. August 2012. Final Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan. Santa Clara County, CA. https://scv-habitatagency.org/178/Santa-Clara-Valley-Habitat-Plan

9. Cornerstone Earth Group. October 2019. Geotechnical Feasibility Study. Walnut Creek, CA.

10. City of San José. August 2017. Winchester Boulevard Urban Village Plan. San José, CA. http://www.sanjoseca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/80871

11. San José Water Company. June 2016. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. San José, CA. http://wuedata.water.ca.gov/public/uwmp_attachments/5545697867/2015%20UWMP%20with%20 Appendices.pdf

12. City of San José. August 2016. “Riparian Corridor Protection and Bird-Safe Design County Policy.” Accessed on September 25, 2019.
https://sanjose.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=&event_id=2148&meta_id=585001

13. City of San José. “San Jose Designated Historic City Landmarks.” Accessed on October 9, 2019. http://www.sanjoseca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/35476

14. City of José. “City José of San Historic Resources Inventory.” Accessed on October 9, 2019. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/35475

15. California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2019. EnviroStor Database; Accessed on September 27, 2019. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/

16. Google, Inc. 2020. Google Earth Pro.

References
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 188 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

17. City of San José. “Heritage Tree List.” Accessed on September 20, 2019. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?NID=3435

18. Santa Clara Valley Water. “Groundwater Management.” Accessed on October 1, 2019. https://www.valleywater.org/your-water/where-your-water-comes-from/groundwater/groundwatermanagement

19. City of San José. “Regulated and Special Projects – Special Projects.” Accessed on October 14, 2019. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?NID=5215

20. City of San José. December 2018. Envision San José 2040 General Plan Planned Growth Areas Diagram. San José, CA.

21. San José Water Company. December 2016. Museum Place Mixed-Use Project Water Supply Assessment. San Jose, CA. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showdocument?id=20379

22. City of San José. “Treatment Process.” Accessed on October 16, 2019. http://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?NID=1672

23. City of San José. “San José-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility.” Accessed on October 16, 2019. http://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?NID=1663

24. Republic Services. “Welcome to Republic Services in San José.” Accessed on August 1, 2020. http://local.republicservices.com/site/santa-clara-ca/san-jose

25. CalRecycle. “Newby Island Sanitary Landfill.” Accessed on August 1, 2020. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/Directory/43-AN-0003/

26. CalRecycle. “Kirby Canyon Recycle and Disposal Facility.” Accessed on August 1, 2020. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/Directory/43-AN-0008/

27. CalRecycle. “Guadalupe Sanitary Landfill.” Accessed on August 1, 2020. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/Directory/43-AN-0015/

28. Santa Clara County Integrate Waste Management. 2011. “SCC 3rd Five-Year Review Report Revised.” https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rwr/Documents/CoIWMP/CalRecycle709-rev7.pdf

29. CalRecycle. “San Jose 2018 - Jurisdiction per Capita Disposal Trends.” Accessed on October 16, 2019. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/AnnualReporting/ReviewReports

30. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. April 19, 2017. 2017 Clean Air Plan: Spare the Air, Cool the Climate. San Francisco, CA. http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-andresearch/plans/2017-clean-air-plan/attachment-a_-proposed-final-cap-vol-1-pdf.pdf?la=en

31. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. May 2017. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. San Francisco, CA. http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-andresearch/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en References
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 189 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

32. EMC Planning Group. August 14, 2020. 1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel – Criteria Air Pollutant and GHG Emissions Modeling Assessment. Monterey, CA. Appendix B.

33. Illingworth and Rodkin. August 28, 2020. Winchester Hotel Community Risk Assessment.

Cotati, CA.

34. EMC Planning Group. August 5, 2020. EMFAC Results. Monterey, CA. Appendix D.

35. California Energy Commission. Electricity Consumption by County; Accessed August 5, 2020a. http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx

36. California Energy Commission. Gas Consumption by County; Accessed August 5, 2020b. http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbycounty.aspx

37. Essel Environmental Engineering and Consulting. October 2019. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Oakland, CA.

38. City of San José. October 7, 2008. City of San José Council Policy: Private Sector Green Building Policy (6-32). https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showdocument?id=12809

39. California Energy Commission. March 2018. 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards:

Frequently Asked Questions.
https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/Title_24_2019_Building_Standards_ FAQ_ada.pdf

40. California Air Resources Board. May 2014. First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan Building on the Framework Pursuant to AB 32 The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.
https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/first_update_climate_change_scoping_plan. pdf

41. California Department of Finance. January 2020a. Table P-1: Total Estimated and Projected Population for California and Counties: July 1, 2010 to July 1, 2060 in 1-year Increments; Accessed August 5, 2020. http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/projections/

42. California Employment Development Department. July 2020. 2018-2028 Occupational Employment Projections California; Accessed August 5, 2020. https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/employment-projections.html

43. City of San José. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Compliance Checklist.

44. City of San José. June 2011. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy for the City of San José. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showdocument?id=28213

45. United States Environmental Protection Agency. “Overview of Greenhouse Gases.” Last modified May 28, 2020. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases

46. California Department of Finance. May 2020b. Report E-5: Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, January 1, 2011-2020, with 2010 Benchmark; Accessed July 28, 2020. http://dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/e-5/ References
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 190 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

47. Caltrans. “California State Scenic Highway System Map.” Accessed on August 18, 2020. https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=2e921695c43643b1aaf7000dfcc19983

48. City of San José. June 2016. Scenic Corridors Diagram. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showdocument?id=22565

49. Blanco, Maira, Planner, City of San José Department of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement. Email message to consultant, 21 August 2020.

50. Blanco, Maira, Planner, City of San José Department of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement. Email message to consultant, 1 April 2020.

51. Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency. “Habitat Agency Geobrowser.” Accessed on August 19, 2020. http://www.hcpmaps.com/habitat/

52. Santa Clara Valley Water District. November 2016. 2016 Groundwater Management Plan.

San Jose, CA. https://s3.us-west2.amazonaws.com/assets.valleywater.org/2016%20Groundwater%20Management%20Plan.pdf

53. Santa Clara County. November 2016. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Santa Clara County, Norma Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport. San Jose, CA. https://www.sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/ALUC_SJC_CLUP.pdf

54. California Environmental Protection Agency. “Sites Identified with Waste Constituents above Hazardous Waste Levels Outside the Waste Management Unit.” Accessed on August 26, 2020. https://calepa.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2016/10/SiteCleanup-CorteseList-CurrentList.pdf

55. State Water Resources Control Board. “GeoTracker.” Accessed on August 26, 2020. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?myaddress=California&from= header&cqid=1173825919

56. Nicholas Wages, Bay Area Tree Specialists. March 2020. 1073-1087 South Winchester Tree Evaluation.

57. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. June 2020. 1212 South Winchester Hotel Development – Transportation Analysis. Gilroy, CA.

58. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. March 2020. 1212 South Winchester Hotel Development – Draft Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan. Gilroy, CA.

59. City of San José. November 2013. San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant Master Plan. San José, CA. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showdocument?id=206

60. City of Los Angeles. December 2010. Ill Villaggio Toscano Project Environmental Impact Report. Accessed on August 28, 2020.
https://planning.lacity.org/eir/VillaggioToscano/DEIR/files/IV.L_2_%20Wastewater.pdf

61. WJV Acoustics, Inc. September 2020. Environmental Noise Assessment 1212 & 1224 Winchester Boulevard Hotel San Jose, California WJVA Report No. 19-041. Visalia, CA.

References
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 191 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

62. Cal Fire. 2018. “Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map.” Accessed on January 28, 2021. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ//

63. City of San José. Activate SJ Strategic Plan. Accessed on January 29, 2021. https://www.sanjoseca.gov//home/showdocument?id=43503
References
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 192 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
This side intentionally left blank.
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 193 Initial Study City of San José May 2021

LIST OF PREPARERS
EMC Planning Group prepared this initial study under contract to the City of San José. Adam Petersen is the Environmental Project Manager from the City of San José. Persons involved in data gathering analysis, project management, and quality control include the following.

EMC Planning Group
Polaris Kinison Brown, MS, Principal Planner and Project Manager Shoshana Wangerin, Associate Planner and Report Author
Tanya Kalaskar, MS, Associate Planner and Report Author Sally Rideout, EMPA, Principal Planner and Editor
Teri Wissler Adam, Senior Principal and Editor
EJ Kim, Graphics
Illingworth & Rodkin
Casey Divine
James A. Reyff
Health Risk Assessment
WJV Acoustics, Inc.

Walter J. Van Groningen, President
Environmental Noise Assessment
Cornerstone Earth Group
Stephen C. Ohlsen, P.E., Senior Staff Engineer
Danh T. Tran, P.E., Senior Principal Engineer
Geotechnical Feasibility Study
Essel Environmental Engineering & Consulting
Minh Ngo, Project Geologist
Tyler Barazoto, Environmental Consultant
Nik Lahiri, Principal
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Robert Del Rio, Traffic Engineer, Vice President and Principal Associate Transportation Analysis
Transportation Demand Management Plan
Arborist
Nicholas Wages, Certified Arborist
Tree Evaluation Report
List of Preparers
1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel 194 Initial Study City of San José May 2021
This side intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX A

PROJECT PLANS

A.03 A.05 A.04 A.06 A.07 COVER SHEET 2ND FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN TITLE SHEET BUILDING ELEVATION (FRONT) BUILDING SECTION B-B A.14 A.29 TABLE OF CONTENTS A.01 ARCHITECTURAL A.02 BASEMENT(-1) FLOOR PLAN A.00 A.30 BUILDING SECTION A-A MATERIAL BOARD PROJECT INFORMATION SITE PHOTOS BIRD VIEW RENDERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE L.01 L.02 L.03 L.04 VICINITY MAP PARKING RAMP PLAN A.09 A.10 A.11 A.12 A.13 6TH FLOOR PLAN 5TH FLOOR PLAN 4TH FLOOR PLAN 3RD FLOOR PLAN WINCHESTER HOTEL BUILDING RENDERING BUILDING RENDERING FIRST FLOOR PLAN A.15 A.16 A.17 A.18 A.19 A.20 A.21 A.22 A.23 A.24 A.26 A.28 A.08 BUILDING ELEVATION (RIGHT) BUILDING ELEVATION (REAR) BUILDING ELEVATION (LEFT) FIRST FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN SITE IMAGERY PLANTING IMAGERY COVER SHEET A.00 SHADOW STUDY SITE PLAN TRANSPARENCY STUDY SHADOW STUDY SURVEY S.01 SURVEY PLAN 1224&1212 ,S.WINCHESTER BLVD. , SAN JOSE, CA 95128 FIRST FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN BUILDING RENDERING JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 6-6-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/20192 REV-2 05/15/2020 CIVIL ENGINEERING C1.0 C2.0 C3.0 TITLE SHEET GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN DEMOLITION PLAN C3.1 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN C4.1 MEDIA FILTRATION DETAILS C4.0 SECTION & DETAILS STORMWATER CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS C4.2 A.25 BUILDING RENDERING L.05 TREE MITIGATION A.27 BIRD VIEW RENDERING C5.0 FIRE LAYOUT SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
408-921-1882 30025 ALICIA PKWY SAM MONFARED MASOUMI [email protected] DESIGNER : 949-553-0548 310-795-4009 2881 HEMLOCK AVE, SAN JOSE, CA 95128 LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 E-MAIL : OWNER : E-MAIL : CIVIL ENGINEER: E-MAIL : CONTACT : LANDSCAPE ENGINEER : PHADAM ASKARI [email protected] JMH WEISS, INC. 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 [email protected] Dj Edwards. PE. QSD 408-790-4982 APPLICANT: TITLE SHEET A.01 401 FIELDCREST DRIVE, SAN JOSE, CA 95123 HENRY CORD408-283-7292 408-307-0166 CORD ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE SERVICES CA BROKER LIC. 01176923 SCALE : 1"=500' SURVEY ENGINEER : MKessler & ASSOCIATES ONE VENTURE SUITE 130, IRVINE , CA 92618 949 -339
-5330 SITE E-MAIL : [email protected]
PH : (650) 492-3249 SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY HILLS - CA 90210 JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/20192 REV-2 05/15/2020 SCALE : 1"=500' SITE SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
PROJECT INFORMATION & TABLES A.02 PROJECT ADDRESS : TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION : BUILDING CLASSIFICATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: OWNER : ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. : LOT SIZE : ADAM ASKARI Type I-A & III-A Urban Village FRONT SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACK REAR SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACK 26'-0" (first floor: 31'-0") 6'-0" BUILDING HEIGHT : 64'-7" 20'-0" GOVERNMENT BODY : 6'-0" PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project proposes to develop an 6-story hotel (up to a height of 64'7" feet) with up to 119 guestrooms. The first floor would contain the main lobby reception area, guest luggage storage, coffee station and bar area, 2 office rooms , accounting, management, employees break room, men locker room, women locker room,fire control room, laundry, security, fire pomp room, electrical room, and 11 guest rooms. Common outdoor areas for hotel guests are proposed to be locatedon 2nd floor that contain gym and lockers, jacuzzi, steam room,breakfast area and kitchen 18 guest rooms would also be located on 2nd floor. Floors 3 through 6 would contain guest rooms that would range from approximately 270 to 770 square feet in size. A total of 66 parking spaces are provided. Parking is provided by one underground parking level which is using double parking system , which will be supported by a TDM plan. A 20 feet rear setback and 6 feet side setback is provided, and additional sidewalk easements will be provided to allow for 20 feet sidewalk are provided on Winchester avenue. HOTEL 279-17-020 & 279-17-021 ROOM MATRIX SETBACK TABULATION 6th FLOOR 2nd FLOOR 5th FLOOR 4th FLOOR 3rd FLOOR LOBBY & COFFEE SHOP& OFFICE& RECEPTION TOTAL BASEMENT FLOOR -1 1st FLOOR HOTEL ROOMS HOTEL ROOMS PARKING & FLOORS HOTEL ROOMS + HOTEL ROOMS & SECURITY & LAUNDRY HOTEL ROOMS& RESTAURANT/COFFEE SHOP FLOOR USE FLOOR AREA +GYM/STEAM ROOM & JACUZZI FLOOR AREA TABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. REQUIRED 1 PER ROOM & OFFICE 1 PER 1 EMPLOYEE 119 SPACES 10 SPACES TOTAL PROJECT REQUIREMENT PARKING TABLE -WINCHESTER HOTEL RATIO HOTEL ROOMS 119 ROOMS PARKING REDUCTION PARKING PROVIDED BICYCLE & MOTORCYCLE TABLE - WINCHESTER HOTEL 0 % PROVIDED 7 SPACES REQUIRED 12 SPACES 1 SPACE TOTAL PROJECT REQUIREMENT 13 SPACES BICYCLE RATIO REQUESTED TDM REDUCTION BICYCLE BICYCLE MOTORCYCLE 7 SPACES MOTORCYCLE 37 SPACES BICYCLE 8 SPACES MOTORCYCLE 10 EMPLOYEES 129 SPACES EMPLOYEES & OFFICE HOTEL ROOMS EMPLOYEES 1 PER 20 CODE REQUIRED OCCUPANCY GROUP : R1 1 PER 10 ROOMS 1 PER 10 EMPLOYEES PARKING TABLE -WINCHESTER HOTEL8 PARKING TABULATION UNDERGROUND PARKING LEVEL (SINGLE) SPACE REQUESTED TDM REDUCTION 6629 6663 49.0 % UTILITY ROOMS HOTEL ROOMS TOTAL 1224&1212 S.WINCHESTER BLVD. , SAN JOSE, CA 95128 JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 6-9-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 20531.4 15512.9 15282.3 16062.3 16062.3 12657.9 10970.8 107079.9 Type I-A Type III-A Type III-A Type III-A Type III-A Type III-A Type I-A UNDERGROUND PARKING LEVEL (DOUBLE) sq.ft. KING QUEEN 13.4% 10.9% 119 6th FLOOR 2nd FLOOR TOTAL 5th FLOOR 4th FLOOR 3rd FLOOR HOTE ROOM _ TOTAL BASEMENT FLOOR -1 1st FLOOR _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 TYPE OF ROOMS PARKING _ _ 27 FLOORS HOTEL ROOMS HOTEL ROOMS ONE BEDROOM SUITE 2 3 PERCENT _ 1 6 100% 1 HOTEL ROOMS _ 1 18 75.6% ACCESSIBLE KING ACCESSIBLE QUEEN COMMON AREA 22151315_ 311 1 222319 85 5 14 2 13 __ 10 6 _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 _ _ _ 2 _ 3 10 1 11 LOBBY CITY OF SAN JOSE 30,074.52 SQ. FT.

SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021

JACUZZI

WINCHESTER BLVD

SITE PLAN
A.03
JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected] FILE NAME: WINCH-EDIT PLOT DATE: 12-6-20

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 SP20 - 016 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED 6-STORY TYPE IA&IIIA
119GUEST ROOMS HOTEL
OVER 1 LEVEL OF TYPE IA GARAGE
FIRST FLOOR FINISH=164' . 6' HIGH WOODEN FENCE TOP

OF CONCRETE CURB SIDE WALK FRONT SETBACK BACK YARD SETBACK

COMMERCIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

PROPERTY LINE

SIDE SETBACK SIDE SETBACK
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
VICINITY MAP 1. CASTLEMONT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL • 3040 PAYNE AVE. 3. GROCERY OUTLET BARGAIN MARKET • 3140 WILLIAMS RD. 5. PACIFIC OAKS COLLEGE IN SAN JOSE • 1245 S WINCHESTER BLVD. 6. A GRACE SUBACUTE & SKILLED CARE • 1250 S WINCHESTER BLVD. 2. MARIJANE HAMANN PARK • 2747 WESTFIELD AVE. 4. BETHEL CHURCH OF SAN JOSE •1201 S WINCHESTER BLVD. 1 4 2 3 SITE 5 6 JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 VICINITY MAP A.04 SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
SITE PHOTOS A.05 JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021

MOTORCYCLE
AREA
P 4,5
EGRESS
STAIR
BOX

TO LOBBY

GUEST ELEVATOR
100"X44"
F
P 6,7
P 8,9
P 24,25
- 9'-0"
F.F.

P 59,58
P 2
P 3
P 1
P 12,13
P 10,11
P 14,15
P 16,17
P 18,19
P 20,21 P 22,23 P 26,27 P 28,29 P 30,31 P 32,33 P 34,35 P 37,36 P 39,38 P 43,42 P 47,46
P 41,40
P 49,48
P 51,50
P 63,62 P 61,60 P 57,56
-14'-6"
F.F.

P 65
P 45,44
P64

PROPOSED

BASEMENT

FLOOR PLAN
A.06
JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected] FILE NAME: WINCH-EDIT PLOT DATE: 12-7-20

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
1 REV-1 11/01/2019 SP20 - 016
2 REV-2 05/15/2020

KING QUEEN

13.4% 10.9%
119
6th FLOOR
2nd FLOOR
TOTAL
5th FLOOR
4th FLOOR
3rd FLOOR

HOTE ROOM
_
TOTAL
BASEMENT FLOOR -1
1st FLOOR
_

HOTEL ROOMS
1 TYPE OF ROOMS

PARKING
_
_
27 FLOORS

HOTEL ROOMS

HOTEL ROOMS

ONE BEDROOM SUITE
2 3

PERCENT
_
1 6
100%
1 HOTEL ROOMS
_
1 18

75.6%

ACCESSIBLE KING ACCESSIBLE QUEEN

COMMON AREA
22 15
13 15
_
3 1
1 1
22 23
19 85 5 14 2 13
_
_ 10 6
_
HOTEL ROOMS 1
_
_ _ 2
_ 3
10 1 11
LOBBY
VAN PARKING 2
P 52
4 23 PERM BICYCLE
PARKING 1-TIER PARKING 1-TIER 4 PERM BICYCLE
100 SF WORK SPACE (5' X 20')

EV PARKING

EV PARKING

EV PARKING
3 UTILITY ROOM 1
5 EGRESS
STAIR
BOX
70"X90"
parking path of egress travel < 100'
parking path of egress travel < 100'
SLOPE10%
P 55 P 54 P 53
P 66

EV PARKING
-14'-6"
F.F.
-14'-6"
F.F.
10 7 6 3 1
D
B
A
4 C
5 2
E
12 11 9 8
UP
26R
UP
26R
6 8
7 VALET

STATION

VALET QUEUING

KEEP CLEAR VEHICLE TURN-AROUND

VALET RETRIEVAL
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020_RECOVER PLOT DATE: 11-2-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 SP20 - 016 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED PARKING RAMP PLAN A.07 26'-0" W DRIVING AISLE SLOPE 10% 26'-0" W DRIVING AISLE SLOPE 20% 26'-0" W DRIVING AISLE SLOPE 10% RAMP LENGTH = 8'- 0" F.F. - 9'-0" F.F. ± 0.00 RAMP LENGTH = 37'- 0" START RAMP END OF RAMP RAMP LENGTH = 8'- 0" D3 B3 BASEMENT -1 RAMP 3 REV-3 02/01/2021 JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected] FILE NAME: WINCH-EDIT PLOT DATE: 12-7-20

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
1 REV-1 11/01/2019 SP20 - 016
2 REV-2 05/15/2020

PROPOSED

FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
A.08
F
(CHECK-IN)

RECEPTION COFFEE SHOP & BAR
LOBBY

ENTRANCE
OFFICE
OFFICE

LUGGAGE

GUEST STORAGE

SECURITY
TRASH

LOCKER ROOM
MEN

LOCKER ROOM
WOMEN

GUEST ELEVATOR
GUEST ELEVATOR 26RUP
60"X54"
UP
26R

DELIVERYAND

LOADING ZONE

FIRE CONTROL ROOM

TO LOBBY
GUEST ELEVATOR SLOPE 10% SLOPE 20%
KING
ROOM#109
KING
ROOM#107 ROOM#108 ROOM#110

ACCESIBLE QUEEN KING KING
ROOM#106
KING
ROOM#111
KING
ROOM#103
KING
ROOM#101 ROOM#102 ROOM#104

KING KING KING
ROOM#105

FIRE POMP ROOM

ELECTRICAL ROOM

LAUNDRY

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING

EMPLOYEE

BREAK ROOM
215'-6"
61'11"< 75' COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL
A-16
B-B
A-15
A-A
UP
26R EGRESS
STAIR
BOX
100"X44" UP
26R
10 7 6 3 1
D
B
A
4 C
5 2
E
12 11 9 8
F
10 7 6 3 1
D
B
A
4 C
5 2
E
12 11 9 8
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
KING ROOM#206 GYM STEAM ROOM KING ROOM#204 ROOM#205 ROOM#207 KING KING JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: FOR CIVIL PLOT DATE: 6-3-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 ROOM#202 ACCESIBLE QUEEN ACCESSIBLE KING KITCHEN KING PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN A.09 ROOM#203 KING ROOM#208 ROOM#209 LOCKER MICRO MICRO MICRO MICRO MICRO MICRO LOCKER MICRO UP A-16 B-B A-15 A-A EXIT EXIT
18R
26R
DN 18RUPDN 26R JACUZZI VOID RESTAURANT ROOM#210 ROOM#211 ROOM#212 QUEEN KINGKING ROOM#213 QUEEN MICRO MICRO MICRO MICRO HOUSE KEEPINGQUEEN ROOM#201 ROOM#217 ROOM#218 KING MICRO MICRO KING ROOM#214 QUEEN ROOM#215 QUEEN MICRO MICRO ROOM#216 QUEEN MICRO KING QUEEN 13.4% 10.9% 119 6th FLOOR 2nd FLOOR TOTAL 5th FLOOR 4th FLOOR 3rd FLOOR HOTE ROOM _ TOTAL BASEMENT FLOOR -1 1st FLOOR _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 TYPE OF ROOMS PARKING _ _ 27 FLOORS HOTEL ROOMS HOTEL ROOMS ONE BEDROOM SUITE 2 3 PERCENT _ 1 6 100% 1 HOTEL ROOMS _ 1 18 75.6% ACCESSIBLE KING ACCESSIBLE QUEEN COMMON AREA 22151315_ 311 1 222319 85 5 14 2 13 __ 10 6 _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 _ _ _ 2 _ 3 10 1 11 LOBBY 215'-6" 162'-11">215'-6"/3=71'-10" 60'7"< 75' COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL 194'7"< 200' EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JACUZZI ROOM#311 JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: FOR CIVIL PLOT DATE: 6-3-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 KING ROOM#302 MICRO KING ROOM#304 MICRO KING ROOM#306 MICRO KING ROOM#303 MICRO KING ROOM#305 MICRO KING ROOM#307 MICRO KING ROOM#309 MICRO KING ROOM#308 MICRO KING ROOM#310 MICRO KING QUEEN ROOM#301 ROOM#313 ROOM#314 ROOM#318 ROOM#317 ROOM#316 ROOM#315 ROOM#319 ROOM#322 ROOM#323 KING MICRO MICRO MICRO MICRO MICRO MICRO KING ONE BEDROOM KING KING KING KING QUEEN PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR PLAN A.10 MICRO
MICRO MICRO A-16 B-B A-15 A-A EXIT EXIT 18RUPDN 26R ROOM#324 ROOM#325 ROOM#326 KING KING KING MICRO
MICRO
MICRO ROOM#327

MICRO KING
18R
UP
26R
DN HOUSE KEEPING ROOM#321 KINGQUEEN
MICRO ROOM#312 KING ROOM#320 MICRO ONE BEDROOM KING QUEEN 13.4% 10.9% 119 6th FLOOR 2nd FLOOR TOTAL 5th FLOOR 4th FLOOR 3rd FLOOR HOTE ROOM _ TOTAL BASEMENT FLOOR -1 1st FLOOR _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 TYPE OF ROOMS PARKING _ _ 27 FLOORS HOTEL ROOMS HOTEL ROOMS ONE BEDROOM SUITE 2 3 PERCENT _ 1 6 100% 1 HOTEL ROOMS _ 1 18 75.6% ACCESSIBLE KING ACCESSIBLE QUEEN COMMON AREA 22151315_ 311 1 222319 85 5 14 2 13 __ 10 6 _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 _ _ _ 2 _ 3 10 1 11 LOBBY 215'-6" 162'-11">215'-6"/3=71'-10" 194'7"< 200' EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE 60'7"< 75' COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
PROPOSED 4TH FLOOR PLAN A.11
MICRO
MICRO
MICRO
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: FOR CIVIL PLOT DATE: 6-3-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 MICRO ONE BEDROOM MICRO ROOM#410 ROOM#417 ROOM#411 ROOM#415 ROOM#414 ROOM#413 ROOM#412 ROOM#416 MICRO

MICRO MICRO MICRO MICRO MICRO
MICRO KING KING QUEEN ONE BEDROOM KING KING KING KING ROOM#403 ROOM#404 ROOM#407 KING KING ROOM#405 ROOM#406 KING ROOM#408 KING ROOM#402 ROOM#419 MICRO QUEEN ROOM#401
MICRO
MICRO KING ONE BEDROOM MICRO EXIT 18RUPDN 26R
18R
UP
26R
DN HOUSE KEEPING ACCESSIBLE KING ROOM#409 ROOM#418 QUEEN MICRO ACCESSIBLE QUEEN JACUZZI KING QUEEN 13.4% 10.9% 119 6th FLOOR 2nd FLOOR TOTAL 5th FLOOR 4th FLOOR 3rd FLOOR HOTE ROOM _ TOTAL BASEMENT FLOOR -1 1st FLOOR _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 TYPE OF ROOMS PARKING _ _ 27 FLOORS HOTEL ROOMS HOTEL ROOMS ONE BEDROOM SUITE 2 3 PERCENT _ 1 6 100% 1 HOTEL ROOMS _ 1 18 75.6% ACCESSIBLE KING ACCESSIBLE QUEEN COMMON AREA 22151315_ 311 1 222319 85 5 14 2 13 __ 10 6 _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 _ _ _ 2 _ 3 10 1 11 LOBBY MICRO
215'-6" 194'7"< 200' EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE 162'-11">215'-6"/3=71'-10" 54'7"< 75' COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL KING ROOM#516 ROOM#520 KING ROOM#518 KING KING KING MICRO
MICRO
MICRO
MICRO
MICRO ROOM#521
MICRO KING ROOM#517 ROOM#519 A-16 B-B A-15 A-A
SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: FOR CIVIL PLOT DATE: 6-3-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED 5TH FLOOR PLAN A.12 ROOM#512 ROOM#508 ROOM#506 MICRO ONE BEDROOM KING KING D.W ROOM#504 ONE BEDROOM#503 MICRO ROOM#510 KING MICRO ROOM#513 ROOM#507 MICRO MICRO QUEEN KING ROOM#502 ONE BEDROOM MICRO D.W ROOM#501 MICRO MICRO ROOM#509 KING MICRO ONE BEDROOM ROOM#511 KING MICRO MICRO MICRO ROOM#505 EXIT 18RUPDN 26R
18R
UP
26R
DN HOUSE KEEPING KING ROOM#516 ROOM#520 KING ROOM#518 KING KING KING MICRO
MICRO
MICRO
MICRO
MICRO ROOM#514
MICRO ONE BEDROOM ROOM#521

MICRO KING
MICRO KING ROOM#517 ROOM#519 ONE BEDROOM ACCESSIBLE KING ROOM#515 KING QUEEN 13.4% 10.9% 119 6th FLOOR 2nd FLOOR TOTAL 5th FLOOR 4th FLOOR 3rd FLOOR HOTE ROOM _ TOTAL BASEMENT FLOOR -1 1st FLOOR _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 TYPE OF ROOMS PARKING _ _ 27 FLOORS HOTEL ROOMS HOTEL ROOMS ONE BEDROOM SUITE 2 3 PERCENT _ 1 6 100% 1 HOTEL ROOMS _ 1 18 75.6% ACCESSIBLE KING ACCESSIBLE QUEEN COMMON AREA 22151315_ 311 1 222319 85 5 14 2 13 __ 10 6 _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 _ _ _ 2 _ 3 10 1 11 LOBBY A-16 B-B A-15 A-A MICRO JACUZZI 215'-6" 194'7"< 200' EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE 162'-11">215'-6"/3=71'-10" 65'< 75' COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: FOR CIVIL PLOT DATE: 6-3-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 ROOM#603 ROOM#604 ROOM#611 ROOM#605 ROOM#612 MICRO MICRO MICRO MICRO KING ONE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM QUEEN KING PROPOSED 6TH FLOOR PLAN A.13 ROOM#608 KING MICRO ROOM#609 KING MICRO ROOM#610 KING MICRO A-16 B-B A-15 A-A EXIT 18RUPDN 26R 18R
UP
26R

DN HOUSE KEEPING
MICRO KING ROOM#614 ROOM#618 ROOM#615 KING ROOM#617 KING KING KING ROOM#616 MICRO
MICRO
MICRO
MICRO
MICRO ROOM#619
MICRO KING ROOM#602

MICRO KING
MICRO ROOM#601 KING ROOM#613 ACCESSIBLE KING KING QUEEN 13.4% 10.9% 119 6th FLOOR 2nd FLOOR TOTAL 5th FLOOR 4th FLOOR 3rd FLOOR HOTE ROOM _ TOTAL BASEMENT FLOOR -1 1st FLOOR _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 TYPE OF ROOMS PARKING _ _ 27 FLOORS HOTEL ROOMS HOTEL ROOMS ONE BEDROOM SUITE 2 3 PERCENT _ 1 6 100% 1 HOTEL ROOMS _ 1 18 75.6% ACCESSIBLE KING ACCESSIBLE QUEEN COMMON AREA 22151315_ 311 1 222319 85 5 14 2 13 __ 10 6 _ HOTEL ROOMS 1 _ _ _ 2 _ 3 10 1 11 LOBBY STORAGE MICRO JACUZZI 215'-6" 194'7"< 200' EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE 162'-11">215'-6"/3=71'-10" 65'< 75' COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL TERRACE SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: FOR CIVIL PLOT DATE: 6-3-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/20192 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN A.14 A-16 B-B A-15 A-A JACUZZI SLOPE
1/2" PER 12" SLOPE 1/2" PER 12" SLOPE 1/2" PER 12"
SLOPE
1/2" PER 12"
SLOPE
1/2" PER 12" SLOPE 1/2" PER 12" SLOPE 1/2" PER 12"
SLOPE
1/2" PER 12"
SLOPE
1/2" PER 12" SLOPE 1/2" PER 12" SLOPE 1/2" PER 12"
SLOPE
1/2" PER 12"
SLOPE
1/2" PER 12" SLOPE 1/2" PER 12" SLOPE 1/2" PER 12"
SLOPE
1/2" PER 12"
SLOPE
1/2" PER 12" SLOPE 1/2" PER 12" SLOPE 1/2" PER 12"
SLOPE
1/2" PER 12"
215'-6"
SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021

SECTION A-A
PROPERTY LINE UTILITY ROOM PARKING KING ROOM MANAGEMENT RECEPTION GYM KING ROOM KING ROOM KING ROOM KING ROOM KING ROOM KING ROOM JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020_RECOVER PLOT DATE: 9-26-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 SP20 - 016 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 Section A-A A.15 +4+5-1+1+3+6+2 KING ROOM 3 REV-3 02/01/2021 JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020_RECOVER PLOT DATE: 9-26-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019
SP20 - 016
2 REV-2 05/15/2020 RECEPTION QUEEN ROOM OFFICE WOMEN (CHECK-IN) COFFEE SHOP & BAR PARKING OFFICE LOCKER ROOM JACUZZI ACCESSIBLE KING SECTION B-B

PROPERTY LINE LUGGAGE GUEST STORAGESTEAM ROOM QUEEN ROOM ACCESSIBLE KING PROPERTY LINE Section B-B A.16 +4+5-1+1+3+6+2
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020_RECOVER PLOT DATE: 8-20-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION (FRONT) A.17 PROPERTY LINE +4+5+1+3+6+2 FRONT white plexi glass and light stand less wire hard cover electrical wire WINCHESTER HOTEL WINCHESTER HOTEL WOOD FACADE NATURAL WOOD STUCCO SAND ARCHITECTURAL GLAZING WHITE EXPOSED CONCRETE GRAY SP20-016
238
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION (LEFT SIDE) A.18

PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE +4+5+1+3+6+2 LEFT SIDE WOOD FACADE NATURAL WOOD STUCCO SAND ARCHITECTURAL GLAZING WHITE EXPOSED CONCRETE GRAY SP20-016
238
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION (REAR) A.19 +4+5+1+3+6+2 REAR WOOD FACADE NATURAL WOOD STUCCO SAND ARCHITECTURAL GLAZING WHITE EXPOSED CONCRETE GRAY SP20-016
238
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION (RIGHT SIDE) A.20

PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE +4+5+1+6+3+2 RIGHT SIDE WOOD FACADE NATURAL WOOD STUCCO SAND ARCHITECTURAL GLAZING WHITE EXPOSED CONCRETE GRAY SP20-016
238
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED MATERIAL BOARD A.21 ARCHITECTURAL GLAZING STUCCO SAND WHITE EXPOSED CONCRETE GRAY WOOD FACADE NATURAL WOOD JACUZZI WINCHESTER BLVD PROPOSED 6-STORY TYPE IA&IIIA 120GUEST ROOMS HOTEL OVER 1 LEVEL OF TYPE IA GARAGE FIRST FLOOR FINISH=164' SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED BUILDING RENDERING A.22 JACUZZI WINCHESTER BLVD PROPOSED 6-STORY TYPE IA&IIIA 120GUEST ROOMS HOTEL OVER 1 LEVEL OF TYPE IA GARAGE FIRST FLOOR FINISH=164' SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED BUILDING RENDERING A.23 JACUZZI WINCHESTER BLVD PROPOSED 6-STORY TYPE IA&IIIA 120GUEST ROOMS HOTEL OVER 1 LEVEL OF TYPE IA GARAGE FIRST FLOOR FINISH=164' SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED BUILDING RENDERING A.24 JACUZZI WINCHESTER BLVD PROPOSED 6-STORY TYPE IA&IIIA 120GUEST ROOMS HOTEL OVER 1 LEVEL OF TYPE IA GARAGE FIRST FLOOR FINISH=164' SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED BUILDING RENDERING A.25 JACUZZI WINCHESTER BLVD PROPOSED 6-STORY TYPE IA&IIIA 120GUEST ROOMS HOTEL OVER 1 LEVEL OF TYPE IA GARAGE FIRST FLOOR FINISH=164' SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED BIRD VIEW RENDERING A.26 SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED BIRD VIEW RENDERING A.27 SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED SHADOW STUDY A.28 AUTUMN 9 AM AUTUMN 10 AM AUTUMN 12 AM AUTUMN 2PM AUTUMN 4PM WINTER 9AM WINTER 10AM WINTER 12AM WINTER 2PM WINTER 4PM AUTUMN WINTER SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-19-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED SHADOW STUDY A.29 SPRING 8AM SPRING 10AM SPRING 12AM SPRING 2PM SPRING 5PM SUMMER 8AM SUMMER 10AM SUMMER 12AM SUMMER 2PM SUMMER 5PM SPRING SUMMER SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: WINCHESTER HOTEL PD REZONING PERMIT SET-05 12 2020 PLOT DATE: 5-21-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 PROPOSED TRANSPARENCY STUDIO A.30 transparent area : 470.20sq ft transparent area : transparent area : transparent area : transparent area : transparent area : total transparent area : 1871.66 sq ft total surface area : 2925 sq ft total solid area : 1053.34 sq ft total transparency rate : 63 % Solid Area Transparent Area PROPERTY LINE +2
PROPERTY LINE west elavation 502.45sq ft 329.49sq ft 130.50sq ft 364.87sq ft 74.15sq ft SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
PROPOSED SURVEY PLAN S.01 JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: FOR CIVIL PLOT DATE: 6-6-20 REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/20192 REV-2 05/15/2020 SITE REVISIONS
SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
z
0 E
0 w
z
;;:
0 �
:g
N
w
�
w
:,
w J
;;:
'
QUEEN
ROOM#201
I 60'7"< 75' COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL
l}D,
KING
ROOM#218
KING
ROOM#217
' '
' '
' '
.
'
'
'
'
0 "
0 "
'
' '
C(I
1, O' \ / o,._.•--1,�-
' '
---
-
-

HOUSE KEEPING

KITCHEN
-1
< ra 0
0 '
'
I
;,
'
'
f:

MICR

ACCESSIBLE KING
ROOM#202
"
'
'
'
LOCKER
.3 PRU CAR
LAUREL
24" Box
GYM
I'
I I
I I
/
w I
'
'
l
1 ____________ ____ 194'7"< 200' EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE ------------,c ___________ _
I
/
/
RESTAURANT. ·
,,,.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/ .-
VOID
_r1
LOCKER
I

WAS FIL

CALIFORNIA FAN PALM
18' TRUNK
Ml RO

ACCESIBLE QUEEN
ROOM#203
" '
' '
' '
' '
' ' ' '
' '
' ---�
KING
ROOM#204
1G :J
/ I

MICRO MICRO
--- --------------- --- --------------- --
--- --------------- --- ---------------
--- --- --------------- --------------- -- ------ --------------- --------------- --- --- --------------- --------------- --
--- --------------- --
--- --------------- --
�
';:: . ·-·-. . . . .. ·
-· . j
--. .../
�•
-
6 "
@-71'
-�0_, - .
162·
- .. -· ..
-
----
------.-�
-�-· -
-----
QUEEN
ROOM#216
MICllO MICH(
QUEEN
ROOM#215

BAM TEX

TIMBER BAMBOO
15 GAL
7 KING
ROOM#205
",
/
QUEEN
ROOM#214

MICOO MICH(
KING
ROOM#206
,------­
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L ______ _
STEAM
ROOM
./
QUEEN
ROOM#213
n

MICRO MICA
KING.·
/R00M#207
�. f]
\
... EXIT
QUEEN
ROOM#212
MICllO
MICRO
Outdoor Tables & Chairs Chaise Lounges
Slat Wood Decking
on Podium
KING
ROOM#209
)
KING
ROOM#208
KING
ROOM#210
KING
ROOM#211

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected]
OWNER
Adam Askari
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
JMH WEISS, INC.
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: ( 408) 790-4982
[email protected]

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
HILLS - CA 90210
TEL: (650) 492-3249
mailto:[email protected]

REVISIONS
& _REY.=:

L1JLOJl20J.9�-­
�-HE.V�2 05L1512020 __
L ______
;\
;'\\
_________ _
L

L L----
-
L
L
�------ /\
L
/\

PROPOSED

LANDSCAPE PLAN
L.02
CX)
('f)
0 I
O')
1 I SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
PROPOSED FURNITURE IMAGERY L.03 JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: LANDSCAPE 12 05 2020 FINAL EDITION REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 H19 - 038 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 Bike Rack Slat Wood Decking on Podium Concrete Sidewalk Precast Concrete Pavers JACUZZI Natural Gray Color Wooden Bench Bollard Lights Bike Rack Wooden Bench Concrete Sidewalk Natural Gray Color Outdoor Statue Outdoor Statue Outdoor Tables & Chairs Chaise Lounges SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
PROPOSED PLANTING IMAGERY L.04 NOTICE: THE ABOVE PLANTS HAVE BEEN SELECTED AS BEING REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OVERALL PLANTING DESIGN INTENT. THIS PLANT PALETTE IS BEING SUGGESTED FOR USE, BUT SHOULD NOT PRECLUDE USE OF OTHER APPROPRIATE PLANT MATERIAL. OTHER COMPATIBLE VARIETIES OF TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS SHOULD BE SELECTED TO COMPLEMENT THE CHARACTER OF THE PROJECT. WE DO NOT HAVE ANY PLANTS ON STORMWATERS AREA. JMH WEISS, INC. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHILA YASMEH 628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY mailto:[email protected] CIVIL ENGINEER 1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880 San Jose, CA 95110 TEL: (408) 790-4982 [email protected] TEL: (650) 492-3249 CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP Sam Monfared 30025 ALICIA PKWY LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677 TEL: (310) 795-4009 [email protected] FILE NAME: LANDSCAPE 12 05 2020 FINAL EDITION REVISIONS OWNER Adam Askari TEL: (408) 921-1882 [email protected] 2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose HILLS - CA 90210 1 REV-1 11/01/2019 H19 - 038 2 REV-2 05/15/2020 MAR ARB CER OCC LAG IND ACE PLA GIN BIL QUE FRA TREES KEY WAS FIL PRU CAR BAM TEX 123456789 24" BOX SIZE 24" BOX 24" BOX 36" BOX 24" BOX 24" BOX 24" BOX 18" BOX 15 GAL BOTANICAL NAME QUERCUS FRAINETTO CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS GINKGO BILOBA ACER PALMATUM LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA ARBUTUS U 'MARINA' PRUNUS CAROLINIANA WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA BAMBUSA TEXTILIS COMMON NAME ITALIAN OAK WESTERN REDBUD GINKGO JAPANESE MAPLE CREPE-MYRTLE STRAWBERRY TREE LAUREL CALIFORNIA FAN PALM TIMBER BAMBOO QUANTITY 3254258611 SPACING COMMENTS/ NATIVE CALIFORNIA RATING WUCOLS NATIVE NATIVE MEDIUM STD. MULTI MULTI NCRTCCCT SHURBS KEY 1234 1 GAL SIZE BOTANICAL NAME CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS COMMON NAME BLUE BLOSSOM SWORD FERN BUSH ANEMONE TUSCAN BLUE ROSEMARY SPACING COMMENTS/ NATIVE CALIFORNIA RATING WUCOLS NATIVE NATIVE LOW 1 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL GRASSES GROUND COVER VINES 5678910 JPLCSMSDCCBO 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL LOW NATIVE LOW 60" O.C 18" O.C 'REPENS VICTORIA' NEPHROLEPIS CORDIFOLIA CARPENTERIA CALIFORNICA ROSEMARINUS OFFICIANALIS 'TUSCAN BLUE' LEYMUS CONDENSATUS JUNCUS PATENS SATUREJA DOUGLASII SENECIO MANDRALISCAPE CLYTOSTOMA CALESTOIGES BOUGANVILLEA 'CALIFORNIA GOLD' CANYON PRINCE WILD RYE CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH YERBA BUENA BLUE CHALK STICKS BOUGANVILLEA TRUMPET VINE *5 GALLON UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SP20-016
3 REV-3 02/01/2021

PROPOSED

PLANTING

IMAGERY
L.05
JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected] FILE NAME: WINCH-EDIT PLOT DATE: 12-6-20

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
1 REV-1 11/01/2019 SP20 - 016
2 REV-2 05/15/2020
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 BOTANICAL NAME

WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA

FRAXINUS AMERICANA

CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS

LIGUSTRUM SP

COMMON NAME

MEXICAN FAN PALM

COAST LIVE OAK
ASH

WEEPING BOTTLE BRUSH
PRIVET
NATIVE

CALIFORNIA
TREE NO. (at 54" above grade)
DBH
(1 to 5)
Tree Health
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 BOTANICAL NAME

PERSEA AMERICANA

CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA

CUPRESSUS MACROCARPA

COMMON NAME

AVOCADO

CAMPHOR

CYPRESS
TREE NO.
3 4
3 3
3 3
3 4
4 4
4 4
4 3
3 2
4 4

WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA MEXICAN FAN PALM
14"
18"
8"

CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS WEEPING BOTTLE BRUSH
11"
12"
15"
CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS WEEPING BOTTLE BRUSH 10"
20"
8"

LIGUSTRUM SP PRIVET
LIGUSTRUM SP PRIVET 15"
LIGUSTRUM SP PRIVET 22"
9"
30"

PERSEA AMERICANA AVOCADO

LIGUSTRUM SP PRIVET

CUPRESSUS MACROCARPA CYPRESS
36"
10"
ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIAN LOCUST 25"
12"
34"
NATIVE
NATIVE
NATIVE Orchard
NATIVE
NATIVE
NATIVE
Orchard
TREE Replacement Ratios
Circumference of
Less than 19" inches
38 inches or more
19 to 38 inches
Tree to be Removed
Type of Tree to be Removed
NATIVE NATIVE Orchard
Non5:1 4:1 3:1
3:1
1:1
2:1
1:1
None
None
Minimum Size of Each
Replacement Tree
15-gallon
15-gallon
15-gallon
X:X = tree replacement to tree loss ratio
Note: Trees greater than or equal to 38-inch circumference shall not be removed unless a Tree removal Permit, or equivalent, has been approved for the removal of such trees. For Multi-Family residential, Commercial and Industrial properties, a permit is required for removal of trees of any size.

A 38-inch tree equal 12.1 inches in diameter.

A 24-inch box tree = two 15-gallon trees.

Single Family and Two-dwelling properties may be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio.

TREE MITIGATION ANALYSIS/PROGRAM
Using the chart below, there are a total of 32 mitigation trees required. 1-Non-Native 38" + tree
1-Native 19"-38" tree
1-Non-Native 19"-38" tree
Mitigation Requirement
4 3
2 0
32 The plan proposes 46 new trees total, meeting the mitigation requirement.

TREE DISPOSITION LEGEND

EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN

EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED

TREE NUMBER PER ARBORIST REPORT

PROPOSED TREE
TREE #N

EXISTING TREES EXISTING TREES
NOTE : SEE ARBORIST REPORT FOR TREE PROTECTION NOTES
4-Native 38" + trees 20
1-Orchard 38"+ tree
1-Orchard 19"-38" trees
3 NATIVE

CALIFORNIA
(at 54" above grade)
DBH
(1 to 5)
Tree Health

TO BE REMOVED

TO BE REMOVED

TO BE REMOVED

TO BE REMOVED

TO BE REMOVED

TO BE REMOVED

TO BE REMOVED

TO BE REMOVED

TO BE REMOVED

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN
Tree Mitigation Tree Mitigation

NON NATIVE NON NATIVE

NON NATIVE

NON NATIVE

NON NATIVE

NON NATIVE

NON NATIVE

NON NATIVE

NON NATIVE

NON NATIVE
(CHECK-IN) RECEPTION COFFEE SHOP & BAR
LOBBY

ENTRANCE

OFFICE OFFICE

LUGGAGE GUEST STORAGE

SECURITY
TRASH

LOCKER ROOM
MEN

LOCKER ROOM WOMEN

GUEST ELEVATOR
GUEST ELEVATOR 26R UP
60"X54"
UP
26R

FIRE CONTROL ROOM
TO LOBBY GUEST ELEVATOR SLOPE 10% SLOPE 20%
KING
ROOM#109 KING ROOM#107 ROOM#108 ROOM#110 ACCESIBLE QUEEN KING KING ROOM#106 KING
ROOM#111 KING
ROOM#103 KING ROOM#101 ROOM#102 ROOM#104 KING KING KING ROOM#105

FIRE POMP ROOM

ELECTRICAL ROOM

LAUNDRY

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING

EMPLOYEE

BREAK ROOM
215'-6"
61'11"< 75' COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL
UP
26R EGRESS
STAIR
BOX
100"X44" UP
26R
Tree #8
DBH 8" Tree #4
DBH 11"
Tree #7
DBH 10"
Tree #6
DBH 15"
Tree #5
DBH 12"
Tree #9
DBH 20"
Tree #10
DBH 15"
Tree #16
DBH 25"
Tree #17
DBH 12"
Tree #18
DBH 34"
Tree #12
DBH 9"
Tree #13
DBH 30"
Tree #15
DBH 10"
Tree #14
DBH 36"
Tree #2
DBH 18"
Tree #1
DBH 14"

ROOF OUTLINE

DELIVERYAND

LOADING ZONE
3 REV-3 02/01/2021
SLOPE 10% SLOPE 20%
1212 & 1224 S. WINCHESTER BOULEVARD

SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA

SHEET INDEX

SITE ADDRESS
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

DATUM NOTES:

SOUTH WINCHESTER BOULEVARD
ABBREVIATION:

LEGEND: JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected]

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
DATE: 02/05/2021
PROJECT FILE NUMBER: SP20-016
SITE
1224 S WINCHESTER BLVD
APN 27917020

TITLE SHEET
C1.0
1212 S WINCHESTER BLVD
APN 27917021

SURVEY NOTES

SOUTH WINCHESTER BOULEVARD
JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected]

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
DATE: 02/05/2021
PROJECT FILE NUMBER: SP20-016

DEMOLITION
PLAN
C2.0
GENERAL DEMOLITION NOTES: LEGEND
NOTES:

SLOPE 10% SLOPE 20%
FF 164.52
GARAGE FF 151.52
GARAGE PAD 150.60
C
C
A
A

B B D D EXISTING STRUCTURE EXISTING STRUCTURE
FF
164.52
JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected]

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
DATE: 02/05/2021
PROJECT FILE NUMBER: SP20-016

GRADING,

DRAINAGE,

AND UTILITY
PLAN
C3.0

SOUTH WINCHESTER BOULEVARD

GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY NOTES

RESPONSIBILITY TO INDEPENDENTLY ESTIMATE
APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S
NOTE: EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE

EARTH WORK QUANTITIES
FILL:

CUT:

EXPORT:

IMPORT:

QUANTITIES FOR HIS/HER OWN USE.
11,000 CY**
0 CY**
11,000 CY**
0 CY**
**NUMBERS ASSUME 11" PAD FOR GARAGE SLAB
C
HOTEL
1ST FLOOR
FF 164.52

NEW RIGHT
OF WAY
GARAGE
BELOW
D
HOTEL
1ST FLOOR
GARAGE
BELOW

PROPERTY
LINE
A
HOTEL
1ST FLOOR

EXISTING ROW
GARAGE
BELOW

BUILDING EDGE
FLOORS 2-6

NEW RIGHT
OF WAY

CENTERLINE

SOUTH WINCHESTER BOULEVARD
B
HOTEL
1ST FLOOR
GARAGE
BELOW

PROPERTY
LINE
JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected]

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
DATE: 02/05/2021
PROJECT FILE NUMBER: SP20-016

SECTIONS &

DETAILS
C3.1
26RUP
60"X54"
UP
26R SLOPE 10% SLOPE 20%
61'11"< 75' COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL
UP
26R
100"X44" UP
26R

AREA DRAINS TO

MEDIA FILTER
4462 SQFT

AREA DRAINS TO

MEDIA FILTER
4462 SQFT

SOUTH WINCHESTER BOULEVARD
JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected]

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
DATE: 02/05/2021
PROJECT FILE NUMBER: SP20-016

STORMWATER

CONTROL
PLAN
C4.0
LEGEND
X.X AC
X
NOTES
JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected]

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
DATE: 02/05/2021
PROJECT FILE NUMBER: SP20-016

STORMWATER

CONTROL

NOTES &

DETAILS
C4.1

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
INFORMATION:

I. PROPERTY INFORMATION:

II. RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR MAINTENANCE:

TABLE 1

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES FOR MEDIA FILTERS
NO. MAINTENANCE TASK FREQUENCY OF TASK
1 INSPECT FOR STANDING WATER, SEDIMENT, TRASH AND DEBRIS. MONTHLY DURING RAINY SEASON
2 REMOVE ACCUMULATED TRASH AND DEBRIS IN THE UNIT DURING ROUTINE INSPECTIONS.

MONTHLY DURING RAINY

SEASON, OR AS NEEDED AFTER

STORM EVENTS
3 INSPECT TO ENSURE THAT THE FACILITY IS DRAINING COMPLETELY WITHIN FIVE DAYS AND PER MANUFACTURER’S SPECIFICATIONS.

ONCE DURING THE WET SEASON
AFTER MAJOR STORM EVENT.
4 REPLACE THE MEDIA PER MANUFACTURER’S INSTRUCTIONS OR AS INDICATED BY THE CONDITION OF THE UNIT.

PER MANUFACTURER’S
SPECIFICATIONS.
5 INSPECT MEDIA FILTERS USING THE ATTACHED INSPECTION CHECKLIST. QUARTERLY OR AS NEEDED STANDARD STORMWATER CONTROL NOTES:

TABLE 1

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES FOR BIORETENTION AREAS
NO. MAINTENANCE TASK FREQUENCY OF TASK
1 REMOVE OBSTRUCTIONS, WEEDS, DEBRIS AND TRASH FROM BIORETENTION AREA AND ITS INLETS AND OUTLETS; AND DISPOSE OF PROPERLY.

QUARTERLY, OR AS NEEDED

AFTER STORM EVENTS
2 INSPECT BIORETENTION AREA FOR STANDING WATER. IF STANDING WATER DOES NOT DRAIN WITHIN 2-3 DAYS, TILL AND REPLACE THE SURFACE BIOTREATMENT SOIL WITH THE APPROVED SOIL MIX AND REPLANT.

QUARTERLY, OR AS NEEDED

AFTER STORM EVENTS
3 CHECK UNDERDRAINS FOR CLOGGING. USE THE CLEANOUT RISER TO CLEAN ANY CLOGGED UNDERDRAINS.

QUARTERLY, OR AS NEEDED

AFTER STORM EVENTS
4 MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND ENSURE THAT PLANTS ARE RECEIVING THE CORRECT AMOUNT OF WATER (IF APPLICABLE). QUARTERLY
5 ENSURE THAT THE VEGETATION IS HEALTHY AND DENSE ENOUGH TO PROVIDE FILTERING AND PROTECT SOILS FROM EROSION. PRUNE AND WEED THE BIORETENTION AREA. REMOVE AND/OR REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANTS.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
6 USE COMPOST AND OTHER NATURAL SOIL AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZERS

INSTEAD OF SYNTHETIC FERTILIZERS, ESPECIALLY IF THE SYSTEM USES AN UNDERDRAIN.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
7 CHECK THAT MULCH IS AT APPROPRIATE DEPTH (2 - 3 INCHES PER SOIL SPECIFICATIONS) AND REPLENISH AS NECESSARY BEFORE WET SEASON BEGINS.

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 2” – 3” OF ARBOR MULCH BE REAPPLIED EVERY YEAR.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
8 INSPECT THE ENERGY DISSIPATION AT THE INLET TO ENSURE IT IS FUNCTIONING ADEQUATELY, AND THAT THERE IS NO SCOUR OF THE SURFACE MULCH. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
9 INSPECT OVERFLOW PIPE TO ENSURE THAT IT CAN SAFELY CONVEY EXCESS FLOWS TO A STORM DRAIN. REPAIR OR REPLACE DAMAGED PIPING.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
10 REPLACE BIOTREATMENT SOIL AND MULCH, IF NEEDED. CHECK FOR STANDING WATER, STRUCTURAL FAILURE AND CLOGGED OVERFLOWS. REMOVE TRASH AND DEBRIS. REPLACE DEAD PLANTS.
11 INSPECT BIORETENTION AREA USING THE ATTACHED INSPECTION CHECKLIST. ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET SEASON

BIOTREATMENT SOIL REQUIREMENTS
·
·
PROJECT SITE INFORMATION:

1. SOILS TYPE: B

2. GROUND WATER DEPTH: 55-60' BELOW GROUND SURFACE

3. NAME OF RECEIVING BODY: GUADALUPE

4. FLOOD ZONE: ZONE D

5. FLOOD ELEVATION (IF APPLICABLE): N/A

SITE DESIGN MEASURES

SOURCE CONTROL MEASURES

TYPICAL LINED BIO-RETENTION DETAIL
JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected]

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
DATE: 02/05/2021
PROJECT FILE NUMBER: SP20-016
MEDIA

FILTRATION

DETAILS
C4.2
26R UP
60"X54"
UP
26R SLOPE 10% SLOPE 20%
61'11"< 75' COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL
UP
26R
100"X44" UP
26R
FF 164.52 EXISTING STRUCTURE EXISTING STRUCTURE
JMH WEISS, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

SHILA YASMEH
628 N. MAPLE DR. BEVERLY
mailto:[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
1731 Technology Drive, Suite 880
San Jose, CA 95110
TEL: (408) 790-4982
[email protected]
TEL: (650) 492-3249

CARPIRA DESIGN GROUP
Sam Monfared
30025 ALICIA PKWY
LAGUNA NIGUEL - CA 92677
TEL: (310) 795-4009
[email protected]

REVISIONS
OWNER
Adam Askari
TEL: (408) 921-1882
[email protected]
2881 Hemlock Ave. San Jose
HILLS - CA 90210
DATE: 02/05/2021
PROJECT FILE NUMBER: SP20-016

FIRE LAYOUT
C5.0

SOUTH WINCHESTER BOULEVARD

FIRE GENERAL NOTES
FIRE PROTECTION NOTES:

APPENDIX B

CALEEMOD ASSESSMENT AND RESULTS

MEMORANDUM
To: Polaris Kinison Brown, Principal Planner
From: Tanya Kalaskar, Associate Planner
Cc: File
Date: August 14, 2020
Re: 1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard Hotel – Criteria Air Pollutant and GHG Emissions Modeling Assessment

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is the construction and operations of a hotel on a 0.69-acre site located at 1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard in the City of San José. Existing development on the project site consists of a single-family residence with an event decorator office at 1212 South Winchester Boulevard and a commercial office building located at 1224 South Winchester Boulevard.

The proposed project includes demolition of the existing structures to accommodate a six-story hotel with up to 119 guestrooms. Grading for the proposed project includes excavation of 11,000 cubic yards of soil to accommodate an underground parking garage. The excavated soils would be disposed of off-site. The first floor of the hotel building would contain the main lobby reception area, guest luggage storage, coffee station and bar area, two office rooms, accounting, management, employees break room, men’s and women’s locker rooms, fire control room, laundry, security, fire pump room, electrical room, and 11 guest rooms. The second floor of the hotel would include 18 guest rooms, a gym and lockers, jacuzzi, steam room, restaurant area and kitchen. Floors three through six would include the remaining guest rooms. A total of 69 parking spaces would be provided by one underground parking level covering an area of 20,531.4 square feet. The proposed project includes the removal of 16 trees. The landscape plan Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 2

MEMORANDUM
indicates planting of 46 new trees. The project site is located within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin, which is within the jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (air district). An initial study is being prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed project.

SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT
This assessment provides an estimate of the proposed project’s construction and operational criteria air pollutants and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.2 software, a modeling platform recommended by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and accepted by the air district. Model results are attached to this assessment. Unless otherwise noted, data inputs to the model take into account the type and size of existing and proposed uses utilizing CalEEMod default land uses based on the size metrics provided in the project plans (Carpira Design Group 2020) and trip generation information provided in the transportation analysis prepared for the proposed project (Hexagon Transportation Consultants 2020).

Emissions Model
The CalEEMod software utilizes emissions models USEPA AP-42 emission factors, CARB vehicle emission models studies and studies commissioned by other California agencies such as the California Energy Commission and CalRecycle. The CalEEMod platform allows calculations of both construction and operational criteria pollutant and GHG emissions from land use projects. The model also calculates indirect emissions from processes “downstream” of the proposed project such as GHG emissions from energy use, solid waste disposal, vegetation planting and/or removal, and water use.

CalEEMod is capable of estimating changes in the carbon sequestration potential of a site based on changes in natural vegetation communities and the net number of new trees that would be planted as part of the project. The model calculates a one-time only loss in the carbon sequestration potential of the site that would result from changes in land use such as converting vegetation to built or paved surfaces, and can provide an estimate of the change in the carbon sequestration potential that would result from planting new trees greater than the number of trees to be removed (net number of new trees).

Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 3

MEMORANDUM
The project site is already developed and there are no natural vegetation communities on the site. However, the project plans include proposed tree plantings for the project site (Carpira Design Group 2020). Therefore, this assessment includes quantification of the change in carbon sequestration potential from removing existing trees and planting new trees on the site.

Existing and Proposed Emissions Sources
The size and type of the existing and proposed sources of criteria air pollutants and GHG emissions on the project site and their respective CalEEMod land use default categories are presented in Table 1, Project Characteristics.

Table 1 Project Characteristics
Project Components CalEEMod Land Use1 Existing2 Proposed2 Single-family Home Single Family Housing 1 unit3-
Commercial Office Building General Office Building 8,4834- Hotel Hotel - 119 rooms5
Underground Parking Garage Enclosed Parking with Elevator - 69 spaces6 Impervious Surfaces (on- and off-site) Other Asphalt Surfaces - 11,880.10 Pervious Surfaces (landscaping)7 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces - 2,681 SOURCE: Trinity Consultants 2017, Carpira Design Group 2020, Cord Associates 2020, Google Earth 2020.

NOTES:

1. CalEEMod default land use subtype. Descriptions of the model default land use categories and subtypes are found in the User’s Guide for CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 available online at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide

2. Expressed in units of square feet unless otherwise noted.

3. The area of the single-family home and event decorator office is estimated at approximately 3,000 square feet using Google Earth.

4. According to the project-specific construction spreadsheet, existing structures on the project site cover an area of 11,483 square feet. Area of the commercial office building equals total area of existing structure minus area of single-family home and event decorator office, or 8,483 square feet.

5. The hotel covers an area of 86,548.50 square feet, excluding parking.

6. The underground parking garage covers an area of 20,531.40 square feet.

7. Pervious surfaces are not substantial sources of operational emissions and are included in the model only to capture GHG emissions from construction activities.

METHODOLOGY
Unless otherwise noted, the calculated emissions estimates are based primarily on model default emissions factors for construction and operations of the project. Construction and Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 4

MEMORANDUM
operational criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions estimates are derived for existing conditions and proposed project conditions based on the size metrics presented in Table 1.

Modeling Scenarios
Two modeling scenarios were conducted for the proposed project: Baseline (Existing) Emissions and Proposed Project Emissions.

Baseline (Existing) Emissions
Baseline GHG emissions are those generated under existing conditions. This scenario consists of unmitigated GHG emissions volumes that are generated by the existing single-family home and commercial office on the project site (refer to Table 1). Adjustments are made to the model to account for low carbon intensity efficiencies that are explained in greater detail under the Operational Data Inputs discussion.

Proposed Project Emissions
This scenario estimates unmitigated emissions anticipated through compliance with state regulations. This scenario includes model adjustments to account for mandatory compliance with State requirements for Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and the current Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (BEES). These model adjustments are explained in greater detail under the Operational Data Inputs discussion.

Assumptions
Unless otherwise noted, data inputs for the model scenarios are based on the following primary assumptions:

1. Operational GHG emissions generated by the existing single-family home and event decorator office at 1212 South Winchester Boulevard are estimated using the CalEEMod default land use subtype “Single Family Housing”, which is defined as a detached home on an individual lot. The event decorator office appears to be home office and is included as part of the single-family home.

2. The area of the existing single-family home and event decorator office at 1212 South Winchester Boulevard is estimated at 3,000 square feet using Google Earth.

Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 5

MEMORANDUM

3. Operational GHG emissions generated by the existing commercial office building at 1224 South Winchester Boulevard is estimated using the CalEEMod default land use subtype “General Office Building”, which is defined as a building that houses multiple tenants where affairs of businesses commercial or industrial organizations or professional persons or firms are conducted.

4. Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to begin in January 2021.

5. The anticipated operational year of the proposed project is 2023.

6. Construction and operational emissions for proposed conditions were estimated as follows:
a. Emissions generated by the proposed hotel are assumed to be similar to emissions that would be generated by the CalEEMod default land use subtype “Hotel”, which is defined as a place of lodging that provides sleeping accommodations and supporting facilities such as restaurants, cocktail lounges, meeting and banquet rooms or convention facilities, limited recreational facilities and other retail and service shops. The model default trip generation rate for “Hotel” has been modified based on information provided in the transportation analysis prepared for the proposed project (Hexagon Transportation Consultants 2020);
b. Emissions generated by the proposed underground parking garage are assumed to be similar to emissions that would be generated by the CalEEMod default land subtype “Enclosed Parking with Elevator”, which is defined as an enclosed parking structure that may be above or below ground, is not covered in asphalt, includes an elevator, and will require lighting and ventilation; c. Emissions generated by the proposed on-site and off-site paving are assumed to be similar to emissions that would be generated by the CalEEMod default land use subtype “Other Asphalt Surfaces”, which is defined as an asphalt surface not used as a parking lot; and
d. Emissions generated by construction and curing of the proposed landscaping are assumed to be similar to emissions that would be generated by the CalEEMod default land use subtype “Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces”.

Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 6

MEMORANDUM

7. The proposed project includes the use of an emergency generator and a fire pump.

Model inputs for the emergency generator and fire pump are based on the size and horsepower provided by the applicant (Henry Cord, email message, July 6, 2020), and are assumed to be diesel-fueled. The model data input assumes that each equipment would be run for an average of 24 hours per year for maintenance.

Operational Emissions Data Input
The following adjustments were made to the model inputs:
▪ Each air district (or county) assigns trip lengths for urban and rural settings, which are incorporated into the CalEEMod defaults. Based on the site’s location, the model defaults were set to “urban.”
▪ The model’s default CO2 intensity factor of 641 pounds/megawatt hour is adjusted to 290 pounds/megawatt hour to reflect Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) energy intensity projections for 2020, which is the horizon year for the provider’s energy intensity factor projections. The intensity factor has been falling, in significant part due to the increasing percentage of Pacific Gas & Electric’s energy portfolio obtained from renewable energy.

Emissions intensity data is from PG&E’s Greenhouse Gas Factors: Guidance for PG&E Customers, dated November 2015.
▪ As noted previously, the model default trip generation rates for the proposed hotel are adjusted based on information provided in the transportation analysis prepared for the proposed project (Hexagon Transportation Consultants 2020). ▪ The Title 24 BEES defaults in CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 are the 2016 BEES. Title 24 BEES are updated every three years. The 2019 BEES became effective on January 1, 2020.

Projects are constructed after January 1, 2020 will be required to comply with the 2019 BEES. Adjustments were made to the energy mitigation screen under the proposed project scenario to account for Title 24 increases in energy efficiencies that have occurred since CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 was released. Compliance with the 2019 BEES increases building energy efficiencies by 30 percent over the 2016 BEES for nonresidential buildings (California Energy Commission 2018).

Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 7

MEMORANDUM
▪ The water mitigation screen for the proposed project includes an adjustment to reflect required compliance with the State requirements for MWELO.

Construction Emissions Data Inputs
CalEEMod estimates construction emissions associated with land use development projects and allows for the input of project-specific construction information including phasing and equipment information. Modeling of construction emissions is based on the available projectspecific construction information (Henry Cord, email message, July 6, 2020). The spreadsheet containing project-specific construction schedule, construction phases, type of construction equipment, hours of operation of each equipment, and area to be demolished is attached to this assessment. The modeled volume of dust from material movement during construction is based on information provided in the project plans: 11,000 cubic yards of excavated soils to be exported from the site. The model’s default construction hauling trip length of 20 miles was used to calculate emissions for hauling equipment.

The modeling results for construction emissions are attached to this assessment. The air district recommends amortizing the short-term construction GHG emissions over a 30-year time period to yield an annual emissions volume.

Carbon Sequestration Potential Data Inputs
CalEEMod calculates the change in carbon sequestration potential based upon the net number of trees (the difference between trees removed and new tree plantings) on a site, averaged over a 20-year growth cycle. The proposed project includes removal of 16 existing trees and planting of 46 new trees, for a net total of 30 trees (Carpira Design Group 2020). Changes in sequestration potential are reported in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MT CO2e).

RESULTS
Detailed model results for criteria air pollutants and GHG emissions are included as attachments to this assessment.

Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 8

MEMORANDUM
Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Construction Emissions
The unmitigated criteria air pollutant emissions resulting from project construction are summarized in Table 2, Construction Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions.

Table 2 Construction Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Emissions
Reactive
Organic
Gases (ROG)
Nitrogen
Oxides
(NOX)
Exhaust
Respirable
Particulate Matter
(PM10)
Exhaust Fine
Particulate
Matter (PM2.5)
Total Annual Emissions (tons/year)1 0.69 3.71 0.08 0.08 Average Daily Emissions (pounds/day)1,2 4.31 23.19 0.50 0.50 SOURCE: EMC Planning Group 2020
NOTES:

1. Results may vary due to rounding.

2. CalEEMod estimates construction criteria air pollutant emissions in tons per year. A U.S. ton is equal to 2,000 pounds. The emissions estimates in ton per year are multiped by 2,000 pounds to arrive at emissions volume in pounds per year. CalEEMod estimates a total of 320 construction days (see Section 3.0 of the attached CalEEMod results). Average daily emissions (in pounds per day) are computed by dividing the annual construction emissions (in pounds per year) by the number of construction days.

Operational Emissions
Unmitigated operational criteria air pollutant emissions generated by the proposed project are summarized in Table 3, Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions.

Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 9

MEMORANDUM
Table 3 Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Emissions
Reactive
Organic
Gases
(ROG)
Nitrogen
Oxides
(NOX)
Respirable
Particulate
Matter (PM10)
Fine
Particulate
Matter (PM2.5)
Total Annual Emissions (tons/year)1 0.71 1.48 1.05 0.30 Average Daily Emissions (pounds/day)1,2,3 3.89 8.11 5.75 1.64 SOURCE: EMC Planning Group 2020
NOTES:

1. Results may vary due to rounding.

2. CalEEMod estimates operational criteria air pollutant emissions in tons per year. A U.S. ton is equal to 2,000 pounds. The emissions estimates in ton per year are multiped by 2,000 pounds to arrive at emissions volume in pounds per year. Average daily emissions (in pounds per day) are computed by dividing the annual operational emissions (in pounds per year) by the number of operational days (conservatively assuming 365 days of operation).

3. Includes reductions from compliance with 2019 BEES. Compliance with MWELO does not result in reduction of criteria air pollutant emissions.

GHG Emissions
Baseline Emissions
Baseline (existing) uses generate approximately 118.57 MT CO2e of GHG emissions per year.

Construction Emissions
Construction activity would generate a total of 748.63 MT CO2e of unmitigated GHG emissions.

When averaged over a 30-year operational lifetime, the annual amortized emissions equal 24.95 MT CO2e per year.

Operational Emissions
The unmitigated operational GHG emissions estimates are summarized in Table 4, Unmitigated Operational GHG Emissions.

Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 10

MEMORANDUM
Table 4 Annual Operational GHG Emissions
Emissions Sources GHG Emissions1,2
Area 0.00
Energy3 243.93
Mobile 1,075.11
Stationary 0.92
Waste 32.76
Water4 6.42
Total 1,359.14
SOURCE: EMC Planning Group 2020
NOTES:

1. Results may vary due to rounding.

2. Expressed in MT CO2e per year.

3. Results include emissions reductions from compliance with 2019 BEES.

4. Results include emissions reductions from compliance with MWELO.

Carbon Sequestration Potential
Model results indicating the change in carbon sequestration potential on the project site are shown in Section 2.3 of the model results for annual emissions. The model estimates a net gain in sequestration potential of 21.24 MT CO2e. Averaged over a 30-year lifetime, the annual gain in sequestration potential associated with the proposed project would be equivalent to 0.71 MT CO2e per year (21.24 MT CO2e / 30 years). This amount is deducted from the project’s annual operational GHG emissions.

GHG Emissions Attributable to the Proposed Project
The total GHG emissions that would be attributable to the proposed project consist of amortized construction emissions added to the unmitigated operational emissions, less the baseline emissions and amortized annual gain in carbon sequestration potential on the site. The net GHG emissions attributable to the proposed project annually are presented in Table 5, Summary of Annual GHG Emissions Attributable to the Project.

Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 11

MEMORANDUM
Table 5 Summary of Annual GHG Emissions Attributable to the Project1,2 Annual
Operations3
Amortized
Construction
Annual Project
Emissions4
Baseline
Emissions5
Sequestration
Potential5
Net Project
Emissions
1,359.14 24.95 1,384.09 <118.57> <0.71> 1,264.81
SOURCE: EMC Planning Group 2020
NOTES:

1. Results may vary due to rounding.

2. Expressed in MT CO2e per year.

3. Unmitigated Operational GHG emissions (See Table 4).

4. Sum of amortized construction and unmitigated operational emissions.

5. <Brackets> Indicate deductions.

SOURCES

1. Trinity Consultants. November 2017. California Emissions Estimator (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2. Available online at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home

2. Trinity Consultants. November 2017. CalEEMod User’s Guide (Version 2016.3.2).

Available online at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide

3. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. May 2017. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-andresearch/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en

4. Google, Inc. 2020. Google Earth.

5. Carpira Design Group. May 15, 2020. Project Plans. Concord, CA.

6. Hexagon Transportation Consultants. 1212 South Winchester Hotel Development Transportation Analysis. June 18, 2020. Gilroy, CA.

7. Pacific Gas & Electric. November 2015. Greenhouse Gas Factors: Guidance for PG&E Customers; Accessed December 13, 2019. https://www.ca-ilg.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/ghg_emission_factor_guidance.pdf?1436996158

8. California Energy Commission. March 2018. 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards Frequently Asked Questions.
https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/Title_24_2019_Building_S tandards_FAQ_ada.pdf
Polaris Kinison Brown
EMC Planning Group
August 14, 2020, Page 12

MEMORANDUM

9. Cord, Henry, Cord Associates. Email message to consultant, 6 July 2020.

Air Quality Construction Information Data Request
Project Name: Winchester Hotel
See Equipment Type TAB for type, horsepower and load factor Project Size 119 Dwelling Units .69 acres total project acres disturbed s.f. residential Pile Driving? Y/N? No
s.f. retail
78749 s.f. office/commercial 119 hotel rooms Project include OPERATIONAL GENERATOR OR FIRE PUMP on-site? Y/N? ___Y_ 7,700 s.f. other, specify: hotel lobby. Etc. IF YES (if BOTH separate values) --> Fire Pump / Generator 20,531 s.f. parking garage 67 spaces
Kilowatts/Horsepower: Pump 48/100 Generator 75/150
s.f. parking lot spaces
Fuel Type: Electric / Diesel
Construction Hours 7 am to 5 pm
Location in project (Plans Desired if Available): 1st Floor

DO NOT MULTIPLY EQUIPMENT HOURS/DAY BY THE QUANTITY OF EQUIPMENT Quantity Description HP Load Factor Hours/day
Total
Work
Days
Avg.

Hours per
day
Annual
Hours Comments
Demolition Start Date: 1/1/2021 Total phase: 20 Overall Import/Export Volumes End Date: 2/1/2021
2 Concrete/Industrial Saws 81 0.73 8 3 1.2 48 Demolition Volume 1 Excavators 158 0.38 8 10 4 80 Square footage of buildings to be demolished 1 Rubber-Tired Dozers 247 0.4 8 10 4 80 11483 square feet 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 7 2.8 168 Square footage of pavement to be demolished 12345 square feet
Any pavement demolished and hauled? 515 tons
Site Preparation Start Date: 2/1/2021 Total phase: 10
End Date: 2/15/2021
1 Graders 187 0.41 8 5 4 40
1 Rubber Tired Dozers 247 0.4 8 5 4 40
3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 10 8 240
Grading / Excavation Start Date: 2/15/2021 Total phase: 40 End Date: 4/15/2021 Soil Hauling Volume
2 Excavators 158 0.38 8 40 8 640 Export volume = 11,000 cubic yards 1 Graders 187 0.41 8 10 2 80 Import volume = 0 cubic yards 1 Rubber Tired Dozers 247 0.4 8 20 4 160
Concrete/Industrial Saws 81 0.73 0 0 0
2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 30 6 480
Other Equipment?
Trenching/Foundation Start Date: 4/15/2021 Total phase: 10 End Date: 4/31/2021
1 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe 97 0.37 8 10 8 80
1 Excavators 158 0.38 8 10 8 80
Other Equipment?
Building - Exterior Start Date: 5/1/2021 Total phase: 160 Cement Trucks? 409 Total Round-Trips End Date: 2/1/2022
1 Cranes 231 0.29 8 80 4 640 Electric? (Y/N) __N_ Otherwise assumed diesel 2 Forklifts 89 0.2 8 160 8 2560 Liquid Propane (LPG)? (Y/N) __N_ Otherwise Assumed diesel 0 Generator Sets 84 0.74 0 0 Or temporary line power? (Y/N) __Y 1 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 4 80 2 320
0 Welders 46 0.45 0 0
Other Equipment?
Building - Interior/Architectural Coating Start Date: 2/1/2022 Total phase: 60 End Date: 5/1/2022
1 Air Compressors 78 0.48 4 60 4 240
1 Aerial Lift 62 0.31 8 60 8 480 Electric
Other Equipment?
Paving Start Date: 5/1/2022 Total phase: 20
Start Date: 6/1/2022
2 Cement and Mortar Mixers 9 0.56 8 10 4 160
Pavers 130 0.42 0 0
Paving Equipment 132 0.36 0 0
Rollers 80 0.38 0 0
2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 10 4 160
Other Equipment?
Additional Phases Start Date: Total phase:

Start Date:
#DIV/0! 0
#DIV/0! 0
#DIV/0! 0
#DIV/0! 0
#DIV/0! 0
Equipment types listed in "Equipment Types" worksheet tab.

Equipment listed in this sheet is to provide an example of inputs Complete one sheet for each project component It is assumed that water trucks would be used during grading Add or subtract phases and equipment, as appropriate
Modify horsepower or load factor, as appropriate
Complete ALL Portions in Yellow
Asphalt? ___ cubic yards or ____ round trips?
Fugitive CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total

2.2 Overall Operational

2.0 Emissions Summary

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Adjusted PG&E CO2 Intensity Factor for 2020 Land Use - total size of ext structures = 11,483 sf from construction data sheet Construction Phase - no construction. Existing Conditions CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
290 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006
64 Climate Zone 4 Operational Year 2020
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Single Family Housing 1.00 Dwelling Unit 0.32 3,000.00 3 Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 8.48 1000sqft 0.19 8,483.00 0

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2

Winchester Hotel_Existing Conditions - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Winchester Hotel_Existing Conditions
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

15.00 54.00 86 11 3

4.4 Fleet Mix

48.00 19.00 77 19 4
Single Family Housing 10.80 4.80 5.70 31.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
General Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or CW
Total 103.09 30.78 17.53 191,701
Single Family Housing 9.52 9.91 8.62 21,819
General Office Building 93.57 20.87 8.91 169,882

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

0.0000 79.8345 79.8345 3.1300e0030.0714 9.7000e- 0.0000 79.9128 004

0.0723 0.0192 9.1000e004Unmitigated 0.0237 0.1142 0.2701 8.7000e- 0.0201 004
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10

2.4833 111.3630 113.8463 0.1668 1.8500e0030.0714 2.8800e- 118.5671 003

0.0742 0.0192 2.8200e003Total 0.0821 0.1226 0.2925 9.4000e- 0.0220 004

0.4988 1.5634 2.0622 0.0514 1.2400e003Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.7171 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8574 0.0000 1.8574 0.1098 0.0000 4.6016

0.0000 79.8345 79.8345 3.1300e0030.0714 9.7000e- 0.0000 79.9128 004

0.0723 0.0192 9.1000e004Mobile 0.0237 0.1142 0.2701 8.7000e- 0.0201 004

0.0000 29.9217 29.9217 2.2700e0036.0000e0046.3000e- 30.1566 004

6.3000e0046.3000e0046.3000e004Energy 9.1000e0048.1500e0036.2900e0035.0000e005

0.1271 0.0435 0.1706 2.5000e0041.0000e0051.2800e- 0.1791 003

1.2800e0031.2800e0031.2800e003Area 0.0575 2.2000e0040.0161 2.0000e005 Category tons/yr MT/yr

20.0684
Single Family
Housing
8090.57 1.0643 1.1000e0042.0000e0051.0735
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
151252 19.8959 1.9900e0034.1000e004

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

6.3000e- 9.0147
004

0.0000 8.9615 8.9615 1.7000e0041.7000e0045.0000e0056.3000e0046.3000e0046.3000e004

1.5510 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.5602
Total 9.1000e0048.1500e0036.2900e003

1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0000 1.5510

7.4545
Single Family
Housing
29065.1 1.6000e0041.3400e0035.7000e0041.0000e0051.1000e004

5.2000e0040.0000 7.4105 7.4105 1.4000e0041.4000e0044.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0045.2000e004General Office Building
138867 7.5000e0046.8100e0035.7200e003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10

0.0000 8.9615 8.9615 1.7000e0041.6000e0046.3000e- 9.0147 004

6.3000e0046.3000e0046.3000e004NaturalGas
Unmitigated

9.1000e0048.1500e0036.2900e0035.0000e005

0.0000 20.9602 20.9602 2.1000e0034.3000e004Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 21.1418 Unmitigated
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5
Total
SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

0.000877 0.000812

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO
Single Family Housing 0.573139 0.040894 0.193976 0.114604 0.017740 0.005371 0.017133 0.024527 0.002545 0.002442 0.005942 General Office Building 0.573139 0.040894 0.193976 0.114604 0.017740 0.005371 0.017133 0.024527 0.002545 0.002442 0.005942 0.000877 0.000812

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated 2.0622 0.0514 1.2400e0033.7171
Category t
o
n
MT/yr

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.1271 0.0435 0.1706 2.5000e0041.0000e0051.2800e- 0.1791 003

1.2800e0031.2800e0031.2800e003Total 0.0575 2.2000e0040.0161 2.0000e005

0.0000 0.0123 0.0123 1.0000e0054.0000e- 0.0000 0.0126
005

4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e005Landscaping 2.3000e0049.0000e0057.5300e0030.0000

0.1271 0.0312 0.1583 2.4000e0041.0000e0051.2400e- 0.1665 003

1.2400e0031.2400e0031.2400e003Hearth 5.8900e0031.3000e0048.5700e0032.0000e005 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products

0.0449
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

6.5400e003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.1271 0.0435 0.1706 2.5000e0041.0000e0051.2800e- 0.1791 003

1.2800e0031.2800e0031.2800e003Unmitigated 0.0575 2.2000e0040.0161 2.0000e005 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Total 20.9602 2.1000e- 21.1418
003

4.3000e004
Total 1.8574 0.1098 0.0000 4.6016

3.9679
Single Family
Housing

1.26 0.2558 0.0151 0.0000 0.6337
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building

7.89 1.6016 0.0947 0.0000

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 1.8574 0.1098 0.0000 4.6016
t
o
n
MT/yr

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 2.0622 0.0514 1.2400e- 3.7171
003

3.5626
Single Family
Housing

0.065154 /

0.0410754

0.0860 2.1300e0035.0000e0050.1545
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building

1.50718 /

0.923757

1.9762 0.0493 1.1900e003
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Demolition - from construction data sheet
Off-road Equipment - per construction data sheet
Trips and VMT - 409 Round cement trips added to vendor trips of bldg construction phase

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Adjusted CO2 Intensity Factor for 2020 Land Use - from site plans. bldg footprint = ground floor acreage. Paving includes on-site and off-site Construction Phase - adjusted per construction data sheet CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
290 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006
64 Climate Zone 4 Operational Year 2023
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Hotel 119.00 Room 0.36 86,548.50 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 2.68 1000sqft 0.06 2,681.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 11.88 1000sqft 0.27 11,880.10 0
Floor Surface Area Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 69.00 Space 0.00 20,531.40 0

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2

Winchester Hotel_Proposed Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Winchester Hotel_Proposed Project
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.62 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.97 0.36
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 2,680.00 2,681.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 172,788.00 86,548.50
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 27,600.00 20,531.40
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 11,880.00 11,880.10
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 5.00 0.50
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 11,000.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 10.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 20.00 0.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 40.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 160.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 60.00
Energy Mitigation - compliance with 2019 BEES
Water Mitigation - compliance with MWELO
Operational Off-Road Equipment -
Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps - from applicant construction data sheet. Fire pump and generator assuming 2 hours of operation per month for maintenance
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Grading - soil export = 11,000 cy
Vehicle Trips - trip generation from Hexagon
Sequestration - 30 net new trees
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 12.23
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 12.23
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 20.00 225.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 12.23
tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse HoursPerYear 0.00 24.00 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse NumberOfEquipment 0.00 1.00 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse HorsePowerValue 0.00 150.00 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse HoursPerYear 0.00 24.00 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsEF ROG_EF 2.2480e-003 2.2477e-003 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse HorsePowerValue 0.00 100.00 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsEF CH4_EF 0.07 0.07
tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsEF ROG_EF 2.2480e-003 2.2477e-003 tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 30.00
tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsEF CH4_EF 0.07 0.07
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 641.35 290 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 4.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 4.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 1.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 1.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

2.3 Vegetation
Vegetation
CO2e

14.1825 1,319.584
3 1,333.7668 0.9313 7.0300e0031,359.143
6 Total 0.7137 1.4824 3.3961 0.0125 1.0290 0.0204 1.0495 0.2762 0.0198 0.2960

0.9577 2.2936 3.2513 0.0986 2.3700e003Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.4223 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 13.2249 0.0000 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000 32.7640

0.0000 0.9139 0.9139 1.3000e0042.9000e- 0.0000 0.9171
004

2.9000e0042.9000e0042.9000e004Stationary 1.9700e0035.5000e0037.1500e0031.0000e005

0.0000 1,074.137
5 1,074.1375 0.0389 0.0000 1,075.109
5 1.0290 9.6800e0031.0387 0.2762 9.0300e003Mobile 0.3102 1.3392 3.2715 0.0117 0.2852

0.0000 242.2356 242.2356 0.0121 4.6600e003Energy 0.0151 0.1376 0.1156 8.3000e- 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 243.9267 004

0.0000 3.6200e0033.6200e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.8600e0031.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e005Area 0.3863 2.0000e0051.8600e0030.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated Operational

2.2 Overall Operational
Maximum 0.3786 3.6408 1.7198 7.8100e- 0.3313 0.0819 0.4132 0.1322 0.0759 0.2081 0.0000 731.8801 731.8801 0.0806 0.0000 733.8941 003

0.0000 14.6675 14.6675 3.0800e0032.3700e- 0.0000 14.7445 003

3.4000e0035.7700e0036.3000e0043.2400e0033.8700e0032022 0.3149 0.0714 0.1032 1.7000e004 2021 0.3786 3.6408 1.7198 7.8100e- 0.3313 0.0819 0.4132 0.1322 0.0759 0.2081 0.0000 731.8801 731.8801 0.0806 0.0000 733.8941 003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 2 8.00 81 0.73
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 20 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0.33
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 129,823; Non-Residential Outdoor: 43,274; Striped Parking Area:
2,106 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
7 Paving Paving 2/28/2022 3/25/2022 5
160
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/6/2021 2/25/2022 5 60 5 Building Construction Building Construction 4/26/2021 12/3/2021 5 40 4 Trenching Trenching 4/12/2021 4/23/2021 5 10
3 Grading Grading 2/15/2021 4/9/2021 5
20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/1/2021 2/12/2021 5 10 End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/4/2021 1/29/2021 5

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
New Trees 21.2400
Total 21.2400
Category t
o
n
MT

7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Paving 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80

10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 2 10.00 0.00 0.00
Building Construction 4 51.00 225.00 0.00 10.80

10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Trenching 2 5.00 0.00 0.00
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 1,375.00 10.80

10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 5 13.00 0.00 0.00
Demolition 7 18.00 0.00 108.00 10.80
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle
Class
Hauling
Vehicle
Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Paving Rollers 0 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Pavers 0 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 8.00 9 0.56
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 4.00 78 0.48
Architectural Coating Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 4.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Forklifts 2 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Trenching Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Trenching Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37

0.0000 10.7580 10.7580 3.4800e003

0.0304 5.2800e- 0.0000 10.8450
003

0.0357 0.0166 4.8600e003Total 0.0103 0.1129 0.0629 1.2000e- 0.0214 004

0.0000 10.7580 10.7580 3.4800e0035.2800e- 0.0000 10.8450 003

5.2800e0034.8600e0034.8600e003Off-Road 0.0103 0.1129 0.0629 1.2000e004 Fugitive Dust 0.0304 0.0000 0.0304 0.0166 0.0000 0.0166 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 5.2877 5.2877 2.4000e0042.3300e- 0.0000 5.2936
003

6.0000e0052.3900e0036.3000e0045.0000e0056.8000e004Total 9.8000e0040.0150 7.1500e0035.0000e005

0.0000 1.2024 1.2024 3.0000e0051.4200e- 0.0000 1.2031
003

1.0000e0051.4300e0033.8000e0041.0000e0053.9000e004Worker 5.5000e0043.8000e0044.0400e0031.0000e005 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 4.0853 4.0853 2.1000e0049.1000e- 0.0000 4.0905
004

5.0000e0059.6000e0042.5000e0044.0000e0052.9000e004Hauling 4.3000e0040.0146 3.1100e0034.0000e005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 30.9856 30.9856 7.1700e0030.0117 0.0132 0.0249 1.7800e- 0.0000 31.1648 003
Total 0.0261 0.2489 0.2144 3.6000e- 0.0124 0.0142
004

0.0000 30.9856 30.9856 7.1700e003Off-Road 0.0261 0.2489 0.2144 3.6000e- 0.0132 0.0132 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 31.1648 004

0.0117 0.0000 0.0117 1.7800e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003

0.0000 1.7800e003Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 54.0163 54.0163 2.6900e003

0.0140 5.9000e- 0.0000 54.0838
004

0.0146 3.8200e0035.6000e0044.3800e003Total 6.3400e0030.1862 0.0463 5.6000e004

0.0000 2.0040 2.0040 4.0000e0052.3700e- 0.0000 2.0051
003

2.0000e0052.3900e0036.3000e0041.0000e0056.4000e004Worker 9.2000e0046.4000e0046.7300e0032.0000e005 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 52.0123 52.0123 2.6500e0030.0116 5.7000e- 0.0000 52.0787 004

0.0122 3.1900e0035.5000e0043.7400e003Hauling 5.4200e0030.1855 0.0395 5.4000e004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0467 0.4999 0.3374 6.3000e- 0.1211 0.0231 0.1441 0.0663 0.0212 0.0875 0.0000 55.7233 55.7233 0.0180 0.0000 56.1738 004
Off-Road 0.0467 0.4999 0.3374 6.3000e- 0.0231 0.0231 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 55.7233 55.7233 0.0180 0.0000 56.1738 004
Fugitive Dust 0.1211 0.0000 0.1211 0.0663 0.0000 0.0663 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.4 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 0.4342 0.4342 1.0000e0055.1000e- 0.0000 0.4344
004

0.0000 5.2000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e004Total 2.0000e0041.4000e0041.4600e0030.0000

0.0000 0.4342 0.4342 1.0000e0055.1000e- 0.0000 0.4344
004

0.0000 5.2000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e004Worker 2.0000e0041.4000e0041.4600e0030.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0612 0.6524 0.4359 8.3000e- 0.0336 0.0336 0.0309 0.0309 0.0000 72.9558 72.9558 0.0236 0.0000 73.5457 004
Off-Road 0.0612 0.6524 0.4359 8.3000e- 0.0336 0.0336 0.0309 0.0309 0.0000 72.9558 72.9558 0.0236 0.0000 73.5457 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

2.0000e- 0.0000 0.1670 0.1670 0.0000 0.0000 0.1671
004

0.0000 2.0000e0045.0000e0050.0000 5.0000e005Total 8.0000e0055.0000e0055.6000e0040.0000

2.0000e- 0.0000 0.1670 0.1670 0.0000 0.0000 0.1671
004

0.0000 2.0000e0045.0000e0050.0000 5.0000e005Worker 8.0000e0055.0000e0055.6000e0040.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 3.6337 3.6337 1.1800e0031.0800e- 0.0000 3.6631
003

1.0800e0039.9000e0049.9000e004Total 2.0800e0030.0203 0.0277 4.0000e005

0.0000 3.6337 3.6337 1.1800e0031.0800e- 0.0000 3.6631
003

1.0800e0039.9000e0049.9000e004Off-Road 2.0800e0030.0203 0.0277 4.0000e005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Trenching - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 0.6680 0.6680 1.0000e0057.9000e- 0.0000 0.6684
004

1.0000e0058.0000e0042.1000e0040.0000 2.1000e004Total 3.1000e0042.1000e0042.2400e0031.0000e005

0.0000 0.6680 0.6680 1.0000e0057.9000e- 0.0000 0.6684
004

1.0000e0058.0000e0042.1000e0040.0000 2.1000e004Worker 3.1000e0042.1000e0042.2400e0031.0000e005 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 3.1774 3.1774 5.9000e0047.4000e- 0.0000 3.1923
004

7.4000e0047.3000e0047.3000e004Total 0.1547 0.0162 0.0231 4.0000e005

0.0000 3.1774 3.1774 5.9000e0047.4000e- 0.0000 3.1923
004

7.4000e0047.3000e0047.3000e004Off-Road 1.8300e0030.0162 0.0231 4.0000e005 Archit. Coating 0.1529 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.1503 4.3000e- 0.0000 494.0731 494.0731 0.0236 0.0000 494.6621 003

0.1546 0.0427 4.1000e003Total 0.0697 1.8887 0.5608 5.1600e- 0.0468 003

0.0000 27.2540 27.2540 6.1000e0040.0322 2.1000e- 0.0000 27.2693 004

0.0325 8.5800e0031.9000e0048.7700e003Worker 0.0125 8.6400e0030.0915 3.0000e004

0.1180 4.0900e- 0.0000 466.8191 466.8191 0.0230 0.0000 467.3928 003

0.1221 0.0341 3.9100e003Vendor 0.0571 1.8801 0.4693 4.8600e- 0.0381 003
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 6.3821 6.3821 1.8600e0032.0900e- 0.0000 6.4287
003

2.0900e0031.9400e0031.9400e003Total 4.8200e0030.0409 0.0509 8.0000e005 Paving 3.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004

0.0000 6.3821 6.3821 1.8600e0032.0900e- 0.0000 6.4287
003

2.0900e0031.9400e0031.9400e003Off-Road 4.4700e0030.0409 0.0509 8.0000e005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.8 Paving - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 1.2870 1.2870 3.0000e0051.5800e- 0.0000 1.2877
003

1.0000e0051.5900e0034.2000e0041.0000e0054.3000e004Total 5.7000e0043.8000e0044.1200e0031.0000e005

0.0000 1.2870 1.2870 3.0000e0051.5800e- 0.0000 1.2877
003

1.0000e0051.5900e0034.2000e0041.0000e0054.3000e004Worker 5.7000e0043.8000e0044.1200e0031.0000e005 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 6.3549 6.3549 1.1800e0031.3000e- 0.0000 6.3843
003

1.3000e0031.2800e0031.2800e003Total 0.3092 0.0300 0.0461 7.0000e005

0.0000 6.3549 6.3549 1.1800e0031.3000e- 0.0000 6.3843
003

1.3000e0031.2800e0031.2800e003Off-Road 3.4500e0030.0300 0.0461 7.0000e005 Archit. Coating 0.3057 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix

0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00

61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Other Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or CW
Total 1,455.37 1,455.37 1,455.37 2,765,102
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 1,455.37 1,455.37 1455.37 2,765,102
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

0.0000 1,074.137
5 1,074.1375 0.0389 0.0000 1,075.109
5 1.0290 9.6800e0031.0387 0.2762 9.0300e003Unmitigated 0.3102 1.3392 3.2715 0.0117 0.2852 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10

0.0000 0.6435 0.6435 1.0000e0057.9000e- 0.0000 0.6438
004

1.0000e0058.0000e0042.1000e0040.0000 2.1000e004Total 2.9000e0041.9000e0042.0600e0031.0000e005

0.0000 0.6435 0.6435 1.0000e0057.9000e- 0.0000 0.6438
004

1.0000e0058.0000e0042.1000e0040.0000 2.1000e004Worker 2.9000e0041.9000e0042.0600e0031.0000e005 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr

0.0105 0.0000 149.8352 149.8352 2.8700e- 150.7256
003

2.7500e0038.3000e0040.0105 0.0105 0.0105

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0151 0.1376 0.1156

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 149.8352 2.8700e0032.7500e003150.7256
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 149.8352

0.0000
Hotel 2.80781e+
006

0.0151 0.1376 0.1156 8.3000e0040.0105

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2
Unmitigated

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

2.8700e0032.7500e003NaturalGas 0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 149.8352 149.8352 150.7256 Unmitigated

0.0151 0.1376 0.1156 8.3000e0040.0105 0.0105

92.4004 92.4004 9.2400e0031.9100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 93.2011 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Unmitigated
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2

0.000891 0.000749

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832

0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749

0.000891 0.000749
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 Hotel 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832

0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749

SBUS MH
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

0.0000 3.6200e003

3.6200e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.8600e0031.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e005Total 0.3863 2.0000e0051.8600e0030.0000

0.0000 3.6200e0033.6200e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.8600e0031.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e005Landscaping 1.7000e0042.0000e0051.8600e0030.0000 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products

0.3403
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.0459
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 3.6200e0033.6200e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.8600e0031.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e005Unmitigated 0.3863 2.0000e0051.8600e0030.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

93.2011

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Total 92.4004 9.2500e0031.9100e003

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

12.7599
Hotel 606272 79.7501 7.9800e0031.6500e00380.4412
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
96169.1 12.6503 1.2700e0032.6000e004
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Unmitigated 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000 32.7640
t
o
n
MT/yr

6.4223

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 3.2513 0.0986 2.3700e003

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Hotel 3.01865 /

0.314945

3.2513 0.0986 2.3700e0036.4223
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Category t
o
n
MT/yr
Unmitigated 3.2513 0.0986 2.3700e0036.4223

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000 0.9139 0.9139 1.3000e004

2.9000e- 0.0000 0.9171
004

2.9000e0042.9000e0042.9000e004Total 1.9700e0035.5000e0037.1500e0031.0000e005 Fire Pump - Diesel 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 (100 - 175 HP)

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.9139 0.9139 1.3000e0042.9000e- 0.0000 0.9171
004

2.9000e0042.9000e0042.9000e004
CO2e
Equipment Type tons/yr MT/yr
Emergency
Generator - Diesel
(100 - 175 HP)

1.9700e0035.5000e0037.1500e0031.0000e005
PM2.5
Total
SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

10.1 Stationary Sources
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO
Fire Pump 0 0 24 150 0.73 Diesel
Load Factor Fuel Type
Emergency Generator 1 0 24 100 0.73 Diesel

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Total 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000 32.7640

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Hotel 65.15 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000 32.7640
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

21.2400
Total 21.2400 0.0000 0.0000 21.2400
t
o
n
MT
Miscellaneous 30 21.2400 0.0000 0.0000

11.2 Net New Trees
Species Class
Number of
Trees
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
CO2e
Category t
o
n
MT
Unmitigated 21.2400 0.0000 0.0000 21.2400

11.0 Vegetation
Total CO2 CH4 N2O

APPENDIX C

HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT

WINCHESTER HOTEL

COMMUNITY RISK

ASSESSMENT
San José, California
August 28, 2020
Prepared for:

Polaris Kinison Brown
Principal Planner
EMC Planning Group, Inc.
301 Lighthouse Avenue, Suite C
Monterey, CA 93940
Prepared by:

Casey Divine &
James A. Reyff
429 East Cotati Avenue
Cotati, CA 94931
(707) 794-0400
I&R Project#: 19-202
1 Introduction
The purpose of this report is to address the potential construction community risk impacts associated with the construction of the proposed hotel project located at 1212 and 1224 S.

Winchester Boulevard in San José, California. The impact of existing sources of toxic air contaminants (TACs) upon the project site are also addressed. The analysis was conducted following guidance provided by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD).1 The BAAQMD recommends using a 1,000-foot screening radius around a project site for purposes of identifying community health risk from siting a new source of TACs.

Project Description
The 0.69-acre project site is currently occupied by two single-family residences. The project proposes to demolish the existing uses and construct a six-story, 119-room hotel. Parking would be provided by one below-grade parking level with 69 parking spaces. According to provided information, construction is anticipated to start in January 2021 with a duration of 15 months.

Full occupancy is expected by 2023.

Setting
The project is located in Santa Clara County, which is in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin.

Ambient air quality standards have been established at both the State and federal level. The Bay Area meets all ambient air quality standards with the exception of ground-level ozone, respirable particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5).

Air Pollutants of Concern
High ozone levels are caused by the cumulative emissions of reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NOX). These precursor pollutants react under certain meteorological conditions to form high ozone levels. Controlling the emissions of these precursor pollutants is the focus of the Bay Area’s attempts to reduce ozone levels. The highest ozone levels in the Bay Area occur in the eastern and southern inland valleys that are downwind of air pollutant sources. High ozone levels aggravate respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, reduced lung function, and increase coughing and chest discomfort.

Particulate matter is another problematic air pollutant of the Bay Area. Particulate matter is assessed and measured in terms of respirable particulate matter or particles that have a diameter of 10 micrometers or less (PM10) and fine particulate matter where particles have a diameter of

2.5 micrometers or less (PM2.5). Elevated concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 are the result of both region-wide (or cumulative) emissions and localized emissions. High particulate matter levels aggravate respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, reduce lung function, increase mortality (e.g., lung cancer), and result in reduced lung function growth in children. 1 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, May 2017. 2 Toxic Air Contaminants
Toxic air contaminants (TAC) are a broad class of compounds known to cause morbidity or mortality (usually because they cause cancer) and include, but are not limited to, the criteria air pollutants. TACs are found in ambient air, especially in urban areas, and are caused by industry, agriculture, fuel combustion, and commercial operations (e.g., dry cleaners). TACs are typically found in low concentrations, even near their source (e.g., diesel particulate matter [DPM] near a freeway). Because chronic exposure can result in adverse health effects, TACs are regulated at the regional, State, and federal level.

Diesel exhaust is the predominant TAC in urban air and is estimated to represent about threequarters of the cancer risk from TACs (based on the Bay Area average). According to the California Air Resources Board (CARB), diesel exhaust is a complex mixture of gases, vapors, and fine particles. This complexity makes the evaluation of health effects of diesel exhaust a complex scientific issue. Some of the chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and formaldehyde, have been previously identified as TACs by the CARB, and are listed as carcinogens either under the State's Proposition 65 or under the Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants programs.

Regulatory Setting
Federal Regulations
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets nationwide emission standards for mobile sources, which include on-road (highway) motor vehicles such trucks, buses, and automobiles, and non-road (off-road) vehicles and equipment used in construction, agricultural, industrial, and mining activities (such as bulldozers and loaders). The EPA also sets nationwide fuel standards. California also has the ability to set motor vehicle emission standards and standards for fuel used in California, as long as they are the same or more stringent than the federal standards.

In the past decade the EPA has established a number of emission standards for on- and non-road heavy-duty diesel engines used in trucks and other equipment. This was done in part because diesel engines are a significant source of NOX and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and because the EPA has identified DPM as a probable carcinogen. Implementation of the heavyduty diesel on-road vehicle standards and the non-road diesel engine standards are estimated to reduce particulate matter and NOX emissions from diesel engines up to 95 percent in 2030 when the heavy-duty vehicle fleet is completely replaced with newer heavy-duty vehicles that comply with these emission standards.2

In concert with the diesel engine emission standards, the EPA has also substantially reduced the amount of sulfur allowed in diesel fuels. The sulfur contained in diesel fuel is a significant contributor to the formation of particulate matter in diesel-fueled engine exhaust. The new standards reduced the amount of sulfur allowed by 97 percent for highway diesel fuel (from 500 2 USEPA, 2000. Regulatory Announcement, Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements. EPA420-F-00-057. December. 3 parts per million by weight [ppmw] to 15 ppmw), and by 99 percent for off-highway diesel fuel (from about 3,000 ppmw to 15 ppmw). The low sulfur highway fuel (15 ppmw sulfur), also called ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD), is currently required for use by all vehicles in the U.S.

All of the above federal diesel engine and diesel fuel requirements have been adopted by California, in some cases with modifications making the requirements more stringent or the implementation dates sooner.

State Regulations
To address the issue of diesel emissions in the state, CARB developed the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles.3 In addition
to requiring more stringent emission standards for new on-road and off-road mobile sources and stationary diesel-fueled engines to reduce particulate matter emissions by 90 percent, a significant component of the plan involves application of emission control strategies to existing diesel vehicles and equipment. Many of the measures of the Diesel Risk Reduction Plan have been approved and adopted, including the federal on-road and non-road diesel engine emission standards for new engines, as well as adoption of regulations for low sulfur fuel in California.

CARB has adopted and implemented a number of regulations for stationary and mobile sources to reduce emissions of DPM. Several of these regulatory programs affect medium and heavyduty diesel trucks that represent the bulk of DPM emissions from California highways. CARB regulations require on-road diesel trucks to be retrofitted with particulate matter controls or replaced to meet 2010 or later engine standards that have much lower DPM and PM2.5 emissions. This regulation will substantially reduce these emissions between 2013 and 2023.

While new trucks and buses will meet strict federal standards, this measure is intended to accelerate the rate at which the fleet either turns over so there are more cleaner vehicles on the road or is retrofitted to meet similar standards. With this regulation, older, more polluting trucks would be removed from the roads sooner.

CARB has also adopted and implemented regulations to reduce DPM and NOX emissions from in-use (existing) and new off-road heavy-duty diesel vehicles (e.g., loaders, tractors, bulldozers, backhoes, off-highway trucks, etc.). The regulations apply to diesel-powered off-road vehicles with engines 25 horsepower (hp) or greater. The regulations are intended to reduce particulate matter and NOX exhaust emissions by requiring owners to turn over their fleet (replace older equipment with newer equipment) or retrofit existing equipment in order to achieve specified fleet-averaged emission rates. Implementation of this regulation, in conjunction with stringent federal off-road equipment engine emission limits for new vehicles, will significantly reduce emissions of DPM and NOX.

Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
BAAQMD has jurisdiction over an approximately 5,600-square mile area, commonly referred to as the San Francisco Bay Area (Bay Area). The District’s boundary encompasses the nine San 3 California Air Resources Board, 2000. Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from DieselFueled Engines and Vehicles. October. 4 Francisco Bay Area counties, including Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Marin County, San Francisco County, San Mateo County, Santa Clara County, Napa County, southwestern Solano County, and southern Sonoma County.

BAAQMD is the lead agency in developing plans to address attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards and California Ambient Air Quality Standards. The District also has permit authority over most types of stationary equipment utilized for the proposed project. The BAAQMD is responsible for permitting and inspection of stationary sources; enforcement of regulations, including setting fees, levying fines, and enforcement actions; and ensuring that public nuisances are minimized.

The BAAQMD California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Guidelines4 were
prepared to assist in the evaluation of air quality impacts of projects and plans proposed within the Bay Area. The guidelines provide recommended procedures for evaluating potential air impacts during the environmental review process consistent with CEQA requirements including thresholds of significance, mitigation measures, and background air quality information. They also include assessment methodologies for air toxics, odors, and greenhouse gas emissions.

Attachment 1 includes detailed community risk modeling methodology.

San José Envision 2040 General Plan
The San José Envision 2040 General Plan includes goals, policies, and actions to reduce exposure of the City’s sensitive population to exposure of air pollution and toxic air contaminants or TACs. The following goals, policies, and actions are applicable to the proposed project and this assessment:

Applicable Goals – Air Pollutant Emission Reduction
Goal MS-10 Minimize emissions from new development.

Applicable Policies – Air Pollutant Emission Reduction
MS-10.1 Assess projected air emissions from new development in conformance with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) CEQA Guidelines and relative to state and federal standards. Identify and implement feasible air emission reduction measures.

MS-10.2 Consider the cumulative air quality impacts from proposed developments for proposed land use designation changes and new development, consistent with the region’s Clean Air Plan and State law.

MS-10.3 Promote the expansion and improvement of public transportation services and facilities, where appropriate, to both encourage energy conservation and reduce air pollution.
4 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2017. CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. May. 5 Applicable Goals – Toxic Air Contaminants
Goal MS-11 Minimize exposure of people to air pollution and toxic air contaminants such as ozone, carbon monoxide, lead, and particulate matter.

Applicable Policies – Toxic Air Contaminants
MS-11.2 For projects that emit toxic air contaminants, require project proponents to prepare health risk assessments in accordance with BAAQMD-recommended procedures as part of environmental review and employ effective mitigation to reduce possible health risks to a less than significant level. Alternatively, require new projects (such as, but not limited to, industrial, manufacturing, and processing facilities) that are sources of TACs to be located an adequate distance from residential areas and other sensitive receptors.

MS-11.5 Encourage the use of pollution absorbing trees and vegetation in buffer areas between substantial sources of TACs and sensitive land uses.

Actions – Toxic Air Contaminants
MS-11.7 Consult with BAAQMD to identify stationary and mobile TAC sources and determine the need for and requirements of a health risk assessment for proposed developments.

MS-11.8 For new projects that generate truck traffic, require signage which reminds drivers that the State truck idling law limits truck idling to five minutes.

Sensitive Receptors
There are groups of people more affected by air pollution than others. CARB has identified the following persons who are most likely to be affected by air pollution: children under 16, the elderly over 65, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. These groups are classified as sensitive receptors. Locations that may contain a high concentration of these sensitive population groups include residential areas, hospitals, daycare facilities, elder care facilities, and elementary schools. For cancer risk assessments, children are the most sensitive receptors, since they are more susceptible to cancer causing TACs. Residential locations are assumed to include infants and small children. The closest sensitive receptors to the project site are single-family homes adjacent to the northern and eastern project site boundaries and the senior nursing home adjacent to the southern project site boundary. There are more sensitive receptors at farther distances. In addition, there are students at Castlemont Elementary School (3 years and older) located southeast of the project site opposite Payne Avenue. This project would not introduce new sensitive receptors (i.e. residents) to the area. 6 Significance Thresholds
In June 2010, BAAQMD adopted thresholds of significance to assist in the review of projects under CEQA and these significance thresholds were contained in the District’s 2011 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. These thresholds were designed to establish the level at which BAAQMD believed air pollution emissions would cause significant environmental impacts under CEQA.

The thresholds were challenged through a series of court challenges and were mostly upheld.

BAAQMD updated the CEQA Air Quality Guidelines in 2017 to include the latest significance thresholds, which were used in this analysis and are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Community Risk Significance Thresholds
Health Risks and
Hazards
Single Sources Within
1,000-foot Zone of
Influence
Combined Sources (Cumulative from all
sources within 1,000-foot zone of influence)
Excess Cancer Risk >10.0 per one million >100 per one million Hazard Index >1.0 >10.0
Incremental annual
PM2.5
>0.3 µg/m3 >0.8 µg/m3
Note: PM10 = course particulate matter or particulates with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers (µm) or less, PM2.5 = fine particulate matter or particulates with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5µm or less. 7 Construction Community Risk Impacts and Mitigation Measures Project impacts related to increased community risk can occur either by generating emissions of TACs and air pollutants and by introducing a new sensitive receptor, such as a residential use, in proximity to an existing source of TACs. Temporary project construction activity would generate emissions of DPM from equipment and trucks and also generate dust on a temporary basis that could affect nearby sensitive receptors. A construction community health risk assessment was prepared to address project construction impacts on the surrounding off-site sensitive receptors.

Community risk impacts are addressed by predicting increased lifetime cancer risk, the increase in annual PM2.5 concentrations, and computing the Hazard Index (HI) for non-cancer health risks.

Construction equipment and associated heavy-duty truck traffic generates diesel exhaust, which is a known TAC. These exhaust emissions pose health risks for sensitive receptors such as surrounding residents. The primary community risk impact issues associated with construction emissions are cancer risk and exposure to PM2.5. A health risk assessment of the project construction activities was conducted that evaluated potential health effects to nearby sensitive receptors from construction emissions of DPM and PM2.5. 5 This assessment included dispersion
modeling to predict the offsite and onsite concentrations resulting from project construction, so that lifetime cancer risks and non-cancer health effects could be evaluated. The methodology for computing community risks impacts is contained in Attachment 1.

CalEEMod Modeling
The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 was used to estimate emissions from construction of the site assuming full build-out of the project. The CalEEMod modeling was performed by EMC Planning Group. The model output from CalEEMod is included as Attachment 2.

CalEEMod provided annual emissions for both on- and off-site construction activities. On-site activities are primarily made up of construction equipment emissions, while off-site activity includes worker, hauling, and vendor traffic. A construction build-out scenario, including equipment list and schedule, was based on applicant provided information. Construction of the project was predicted to begin January 2021 and last 15 months. The proposed project land uses and demolition/earthwork volumes were modeled as follows:
 119 rooms and 86,548.5 square feet entered as “Hotel” on 0.36 acres,  69 spaces and 20,531.4-sf entered as “Enclosed Parking with Elevator”,  11,880.1-sf entered as “Other Asphalt Surfaces” on 0.27 acres,  2,681-sf entered as “Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces” on 0.06 acres,  23,828-sf of existing building demolition,
 11,000 cubic yards (cy) of soil export during grading, and  409 cement truck total round trips during building construction. 5 DPM is identified by California as a toxic air contaminant due to the potential to cause cancer. 8 The CalEEMod model provided total annual PM10 exhaust emissions (assumed to be DPM) for the off-road construction equipment and for exhaust emissions from on-road vehicles, with total emissions from all construction stages as 0.0814 tons (163 pounds). The on-road emissions are a result of haul truck travel during demolition and grading activities, worker travel, and vendor deliveries during construction. A trip length of one mile was used to represent vehicle travel while at or near the construction site. It was assumed that these emissions from on-road vehicles traveling at or near the site would occur at the construction site. Fugitive PM2.5 dust emissions were calculated by CalEEMod as 0.0907 tons (181 pounds) for the overall construction period.

Dispersion Modeling
The U.S. EPA AERMOD dispersion model was used to predict concentrations of DPM and PM2.5 concentrations at sensitive receptors (residences, daycare) in the vicinity of the project construction area. The AERMOD dispersion model is a BAAQMD-recommended model for use in modeling analysis of these types of emission activities for CEQA projects.6 Emission sources
for the construction site were grouped into two categories: exhaust emissions of DPM and fugitive PM2.5 dust emissions. Combustion equipment exhaust emissions were modeled as a series of point sources with a 9-foot release height (construction equipment exhaust stack height) placed at 20-feet (6-meter) intervals throughout the construction site. This resulted in 88 individual point sources being used to represent mobile equipment DPM exhaust emissions in the construction area, with DPM emissions occurring throughout the project construction site.

Construction fugitive PM2.5 dust emissions were modeled as an area source encompassing the entire construction site with a near ground level release height of 7 feet (2 meters). Construction emissions were modeled as occurring daily between 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. when the majority of construction activity would occur according to the project applicant.

The modeling used a 5-year meteorological data set (2013-2017) from the San José International Airport prepared for use with the AERMOD model by the BAAQMD. Annual DPM and PM2.5 concentrations from construction activities at the project site during the 2021-2022 period were calculated using the model. DPM and PM2.5 concentrations were calculated at nearby sensitive receptor locations. Receptor heights of 5 feet (1.5 meters) and 15 feet (4.5 meters) were used to represent the breathing heights of residences on the first and second floors in nearby singlefamily homes, multi-family developments, and senior nursing home. A breathing height of 3 feet (1 meter) was used to model the construction risks for students at the elementary school.

Construction Community Risk Results
The maximum increased cancer risks were calculated using the modeled TAC concentrations combined with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)guidance for age sensitivity factors and exposure parameters as recommended by BAAQMD (see Attachment 1). Non-cancer health hazards and maximum PM2.5 concentrations were also calculated and identified. Age-sensitivity factors reflect the greater sensitivity of infants and small children to cancer causing TACs. Infant, child, and adult exposures were assumed to occur at all residences during the entire construction period. For the elementary school, students were assumed to be 6 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 2012, Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards, Version 3.0. May.
9 three years and older. The child (ages 2 through 16 years old) cancer risk parameters were used to calculate the increased cancer risk for the students.

The maximum modeled annual PM2.5 concentration was calculated based on combined exhaust and fugitive concentrations. The maximum computed HI value was based on the ratio of the maximum DPM concentration modeled and the chronic inhalation refence exposure level of 5 µg/m3. Attachment 3 to this report includes the emission calculations used for the construction area source modeling and the cancer risk calculations.

The maximum modeled annual DPM and PM2.5 concentrations, which includes both the DPM and fugitive PM2.5 concentrations at nearby sensitive receptors, were used to identify the maximally exposed individuals (MEIs), as shown in Figure 1. Results of this assessment indicated that the construction residential MEI was located at an adjacent single-family home east of the project site. The maximum increased cancer risks would exceed the BAAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one million and the maximum PM2.5 concentrations would exceed the BAAQMD significance threshold of 0.3 μg/m3
. Table 2 summarizes the maximum cancer
risks, PM2.5 concentrations, and health hazard indexes for project related construction activities affecting the residential MEI.

Additionally, modeling was conducted to predict the cancer risks, non-cancer health hazards, and maximum PM2.5 concentrations associated with construction activities at the nearby senior nursing home and elementary school. The maximum increased cancer risks were adjusted using adult and child exposure parameters. The unmitigated PM2.5 concentration at the adjacent senior nursing home does exceed the BAAQMD single-source significance threshold. The unmitigated cancer risk and HI at the adjacent senior nursing home and the unmitigated cancer risk, PM2.5 concentration, and HI at the nearby elementary school do not exceed their respective BAAQMD single-source significance thresholds, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Construction Risk Impacts at the Off-site MEI
Source Cancer Risk
(per million)
Annual PM2.5
(µg/m3)
Hazard
Index
Most Affected Residential Receptor (MEI)
Project Construction Unmitigated
Mitigated

33.1 (infant)

3.7 (infant)

1.46 0.29

0.04 <0.01
BAAQMD Single-Source Threshold >10.0 >0.3 >1.0
Exceed Threshold? Unmitigated
Mitigated
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Most Affected Senior Nursing Home Adult Receptor
Project Construction Unmitigated
Mitigated

0.6 (adult)

0.1 (adult)

1.33 0.26

0.04 <0.01
BAAQMD Single-Source Threshold >10.0 >0.3 >1.0
Exceed Threshold? Unmitigated
Mitigated
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Most Affected Elementary School Child Receptor
Project Construction Unmitigated 2.2 (child) 0.07 0.01
BAAQMD Single-Source Threshold >10.0 >0.3 >1.0
Exceed Threshold? Unmitigated No No No
10 Figure 1. Project Construction Site, Locations of Modeled DPM Point Sources, Locations of Off-Site Sensitive Receptors, and Maximum TAC Location Cumulative Impact of All TAC Sources on the Offsite Project MEI Community health risk assessments typically look at all substantial sources of TACs that can affect sensitive receptors that are located within 1,000 feet of a project site (i.e. influence area).

These sources include rail lines, highways, busy surface streets, and stationary sources identified by BAAQMD. A review of the project influence area indicates that the average daily traffic (ADT) on S. Winchester Boulevard would exceed 10,000 vehicles. Other nearby streets are assumed to have less than 10,000 vehicles per day. A review of BAAQMD’s stationary source geographic information systems (GIS) map tool identified one stationary source with the potential to affect the MEI. Figure 2 shows the location of sources affecting the project site and MEI. Community risk impacts from these sources upon the MEI are reported in Table 3. Details of the modeling and community risk calculations are included in Attachment 4. 11 Figure 2. Project Site and Nearby TAC and PM2.5 Sources Local Roadways – S. Winchester Boulevard
A refined analysis of potential health impacts from vehicle traffic on S. Winchester Boulevard was conducted. The refined analysis involved predicting emissions for the traffic volume and mix of vehicle types on the roadway near the project site and using an atmospheric dispersion model to predict exposure to TACs. The associated cancer risks are then computed based on the modeled exposures. Attachment 1 includes a description of how community risk impacts, including cancer risk are computed.

Traffic Emissions Modeling
This analysis involved the development of DPM, organic TACs, and PM2.5 emissions for traffic on both roadways using the Caltrans version of the EMFAC2017 emissions model, known as CT-EMFAC2017. CT-EMFAC2017 provides emission factors for mobile source criteria pollutants and TACs, including DPM. Emission processes modeled include running exhaust for DPM, PM2.5 and total organic compounds (e.g., TOG), running evaporative losses for TOG, and tire and brake wear and fugitive road dust for PM2.5. All PM2.5 emissions from all vehicles were used, rather than just the PM2.5 fraction from diesel powered vehicles, because all vehicle types 12 (i.e., gasoline and diesel powered) produce PM2.5. Additionally, PM2.5 emissions from vehicle tire and brake wear and from re-entrained roadway dust were included in these emissions. DPM emissions are projected to decrease in the future and are reflected in the CT-EMFAC2017 emissions data. Inputs to the model include region (i.e., Santa Clara County), type of road, truck percentage (CT-EMFAC2017 Santa Clara County default truck percentages), traffic mix assigned by CT-EMFAC2017 for the county, year of analysis, and season. The CT-EMFAC2017 model was used to develop vehicle emission factors for the year 2023. Year 2023 emissions were conservatively assumed as being representative of future conditions over the time period that cancer risks are evaluated (30 years).

The ADT on S. Winchester Boulevard was based on the AM and PM peak-hour background plus project traffic volumes data provided in the project’s traffic report.7 Traffic volumes were then
assumed to increase one percent per year from the year of volumes counts to the operational year. The estimated ADT on S. Winchester Boulevard would be 22,802 vehicles. Average hourly traffic distributions for Santa Clara County roadways were developed using the EMFAC model,8 which were then applied to the ADT volumes to obtain estimated hourly traffic volumes and emissions for the roadway. An average travel speed of 40 miles per hour (mph) on S. Winchester Boulevard was used for all hours of the day based on posted speed limit signs on the roadway.

The first year of occupation was assumed to be 2023.

Dispersion Modeling
Dispersion modeling of TAC and PM2.5 emissions was conducted using the EPA AERMOD model. TAC and PM2.5 emissions from traffic on S. Winchester Boulevard within about 1,000 feet of the project site were evaluated. Vehicle traffic on the roadway was modeled using a series of adjacent volume sources along a line (line volume sources); with line segments used for northbound and southbound travel on Stevens Creek Boulevard. The modeled roadway segments are shown in Figure 2.

A five-year data set (2013-2017) of hourly meteorological data from the San José International Airport was used for the modeling. Other inputs to the model included road geometries and elevations, hourly traffic emissions, and the MEI receptor location. Concentrations were calculated at the construction MEI with receptor heights of 5 feet (1.5 meters) to represent the breathing heights of residents on the first floor.

Results from S. Winchester Boulevard are listed in Table 3. Details of the emission calculations, dispersion modeling, and cancer risk calculations are contained in Attachment 4. 7 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. 1212 South Winchester Hotel Development Transportation Analysis.

July 2020.
8 The Burden output from EMFAC2007, a previous version of CARB’s EMFAC model, was used for this since the current web-based version of EMFAC2017 does not include Burden type output with hour by hour traffic volume information.
13 BAAQMD Permitted Stationary Sources
Permitted stationary sources of air pollution near the project site were identified using BAAQMD’s Permitted Stationary Sources 2018 GIS website.9 This mapping tool identifies the location of nearby stationary sources and their estimated risk and hazard impacts. One source was identified using this tool with the sources being a gas dispensing facility. A stationary source information request was not submitted to BAAQMD since screening risk values for the gas dispensing facility were available on the GIS website.

The website provided screening average daily emissions for all the sources were adjusted for distance using BAAQMD’s Gasoline Dispensing Facility Distance Multiplier. Results from this modeling the screening calculator are listed in Table 3 and are included in Attachment 4.

Cumulative Health Risk Impact at Construction MEI
Table 3 reports both the project and cumulative community risk impacts at the sensitive receptor most affected by construction (i.e. the construction residential MEI). Without mitigation, the project would have an exceedance with respect to community risk caused by project construction activities, since the maximum increased cancer risk and maximum annual PM2.5 concentration exceed their BAAQMD single-source thresholds. The combined unmitigated annual PM2.5 concentration would also exceed the BAAQMD cumulative-source thresholds. However, with the implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2, the project’s risks would be lowered to levels below the single-source thresholds and the cumulative risks would no longer exceed the cumulative threshold.

Table 3. Impacts from Combined Sources at Construction MEI Source Cancer Risk
(per million)
Annual PM2.5
(µg/m3)
Hazard
Index
Project Impacts
Project Construction Unmitigated
Mitigated

33.1 (infant)

3.7 (infant)

1.46 0.29

0.04 <0.01
BAAQMD Single-Source Threshold >10.0 >0.3 >1.0
Exceed Threshold? Unmitigated
Mitigated
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Cumulative Sources
S. Winchester Boulevard, ADT 22,802 2.4 0.18 <0.01
Chevron #6027 (Facility ID #104308, Gas Station)
MEI Distance 615 feet 0.3 -- <0.01
Combined Sources Unmitigated
Mitigated

35.8 (infant)

6.4 (infant)

1.64 0.47
<0.06
<0.03
BAAQMD Cumulative Source Threshold >100 >0.8 >10.0
Exceed Threshold? Unmitigated
Mitigated
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
9 BAAQMD, Web:
https://baaqmd.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=2387ae674013413f987b1071715daa65 14 Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Implement BAAQMD-Recommended Measures to Control Particulate Matter Emissions during Construction.

During construction, the project contractor shall implement measures to reduce emissions of fugitive particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and exhaust particulate matter (DPM) to ensure that short-term health impacts to nearby sensitive receptors are avoided.

Dust and Exhaust Control Measures:

1. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered three times a day and at a frequency adequate to maintain minimum soil moisture of 12 percent. Moisture content can be verified by lab samples or moisture probe.

2. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered.

3. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.

4. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph.

5. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.

6. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]).

Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.

7. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.

8. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

9. All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind speeds exceed 20 mph and visible dust extends beyond site boundaries.

10. Wind breaks (e.g., trees, fences) shall be installed on the windward side(s) of actively disturbed areas of construction adjacent to sensitive receptors. Wind breaks should have at maximum 50 percent air porosity.

11. Vegetative ground cover (e.g., fast-germinating native grass seed) shall be planted in disturbed areas as soon as possible and watered appropriately until vegetation is established.
15 12. The simultaneous occurrence of excavation, grading, and ground-disturbing construction activities on the same area at any one time shall be limited. Activities shall be phased to reduce the amount of disturbed surfaces at any one time.

13. Avoid tracking of visible soil material on to public roadways by employing the following measures if necessary: (1) Site accesses to a distance of 100 feet from public paved roads shall be treated with a 6 to 12-inch compacted layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel and (2) washing truck tires and construction equipment of prior to leaving the site.

14. Sandbags or other erosion control measures shall be installed to prevent silt runoff to public roadways from sites with a slope greater than one percent.

Effectiveness of Mitigation Measure AQ-1
Mitigation Measure AQ-1 represents enhanced dust control mitigation measures that would achieve greater than a 58 percent reduction in on-site fugitive PM10 and greater than a 78 percent reduction in on-site fugitive PM2.5 emissions. These measures are consistent with recommendations in the BAAMQD CEQA Guidance for providing “best management practices” to control construction emissions.

Mitigation Measure AQ-2: Use construction equipment that has low DPM exhaust to minimize emissions.

The project developer shall prepare and the project contractor shall implement a plan to reduce construction particulate emissions by at least 70 percent. The plan shall be prepared prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit and shall be reviewed and approved by the City of San Jose Planning Director and may include the following measures:

1. All construction equipment larger than 25 horsepower used at the site for more than two continuous days or 20 hours total shall meet U.S. EPA Tier 4 emission standards for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5); or,
a. Use equipment with engines that meet U.S. EPA Tier 3 standards equipped with CARB-certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters,10 that altogether achieve a 70 percent reduction in particulate matter exhaust in comparison to uncontrolled equipment; and/or,
b. Use of alternatively fueled equipment or equipment with zero emissions (i.e. electrical equipment); and/or,
c. Provide line power to the site during the early phases of construction to minimize the use of diesel-powered stationary equipment, such as generators.

2. The plan shall utilize the above measures or equivalent measures, and must demonstrate that particulate matter exhaust emissions would be reduced by at least 70 percent, and 10 See http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/verdev/vt/cvt.htm
16 any alternative measures shall be subject to review and approval of the City of San Jose Planning Director prior to the issuance of any permit.

Effectiveness of Mitigation Measure AQ-2
Project construction activities were analyzed with the assumption of Tier 3 equipment with CARB-certified Level 3 diesel particulate filters. The use of equipment meeting Tier 4 standards would have lower emissions. With implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 along with Mitigation Measure AQ-2, the computed maximum increased lifetime residential cancer risk from construction, assuming infant exposure, would be 3.7 in one million or less, the maximum annual PM2.5 concentration would be 0.29 μg/m3
, and the Hazard Index would be less than 0.01.

The cumulative PM2.5 concentration would also be reduced to 0.47 μg/m3 . As a result, the
project’s construction cancer risk, annual PM2.5 concentration, and non-cancer health risks would be reduced below the BAAQMD single-source and cumulative-source thresholds. 17 Supporting Documentation
Attachment 1 is the methodology used to compute community risk impacts, including the methods to compute lifetime cancer risk from exposure to project emissions.

Attachment 2 includes the CalEEMod output provided by EMC Planning Group.

Attachment 3 is the construction health risk assessment. This includes the summary of the dispersion modeling and the cancer risk calculations for construction. AERMOD dispersion modeling files for this assessment, which are quite voluminous, are available upon request and would be provided in digital format
Attachment 4 includes the cumulative community risk calculations, modeling results, and health risk calculations from sources affecting the construction MEI.

Attachment 1: Health Risk Calculation Methodology
A health risk assessment (HRA) for exposure to Toxic Air Contaminates (TACs) requires the application of a risk characterization model to the results from the air dispersion model to estimate potential health risk at each sensitive receptor location. The State of California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and California Air Resources Board (CARB) develop recommended methods for conducting health risk assessments. The most recent OEHHA risk assessment guidelines were published in February of 2015.11 These guidelines incorporate substantial changes designed to provide for enhanced protection of children, as required by State law, compared to previous published risk assessment guidelines. CARB has provided additional guidance on implementing OEHHA’s recommended methods.12 This HRA used the 2015 OEHHA risk assessment guidelines and CARB guidance. The BAAQMD has adopted recommended procedures for applying the newest OEHHA guidelines as part of Regulation 2, Rule 5: New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants.13 Exposure parameters from the OEHHA guidelines and the recent BAAQMD HRA Guidelines were used in this evaluation.

Cancer Risk
Potential increased cancer risk from inhalation of TACs is calculated based on the TAC concentration over the period of exposure, inhalation dose, the TAC cancer potency factor, and an age sensitivity factor to reflect the greater sensitivity of infants and children to cancer causing TACs. The inhalation dose depends on a person’s breathing rate, exposure time and frequency and duration of exposure. These parameters vary depending on the age, or age range, of the persons being exposed and whether the exposure is considered to occur at a residential location or other sensitive receptor location.

The current OEHHA guidance recommends that cancer risk be calculated by age groups to account for different breathing rates and sensitivity to TACs. Specifically, they recommend evaluating risks for the third trimester of pregnancy to age zero, ages zero to less than two (infant exposure), ages two to less than 16 (child exposure), and ages 16 to 70 (adult exposure). Age sensitivity factors (ASFs) associated with the different types of exposure are an ASF of 10 for the third trimester and infant exposures, an ASF of 3 for a child exposure, and an ASF of 1 for an adult exposure. Also associated with each exposure type are different breathing rates, expressed as liters per kilogram of body weight per day (L/kg-day) or liters per kilogram of body weight per 8-hour period for the case of worker or school child exposures. As recommended by the BAAQMD for residential exposures, 95th percentile breathing rates are used for the third trimester and infant exposures, and 80th percentile breathing rates for child and adult exposures.

For children at schools and daycare facilities, BAAQMD recommends using the 95th percentile 8-hour breathing rates. Additionally, CARB and the BAAQMD recommend the use of a 11 OEHHA, 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines, The Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.

February.
12 CARB, 2015. Risk Management Guidance for Stationary Sources of Air Toxics. July 23. 13 BAAQMD, 2016. BAAQMD Air Toxics NSR Program Health Risk Assessment ( HRA) Guidelines. December 2016. residential exposure duration of 30 years for sources with long-term emissions (e.g., roadways).

For workers, assumed to be adults, a 25-year exposure period is recommended by the BAAQMD. For school children a 9-year exposure period is recommended by the BAAQMD.

Under previous OEHHA and BAAQMD HRA guidance, residential receptors are assumed to be at their home 24 hours a day, or 100 percent of the time. In the 2015 Risk Assessment Guidance, OEHHA includes adjustments to exposure duration to account for the fraction of time at home (FAH), which can be less than 100 percent of the time, based on updated population and activity statistics. The FAH factors are age-specific and are: 0.85 for third trimester of pregnancy to less than 2 years old, 0.72 for ages 2 to less than 16 years, and 0.73 for ages 16 to 70 years. Use of the FAH factors is allowed by the BAAQMD if there are no schools in the project vicinity have a cancer risk of one in a million or greater assuming 100 percent exposure (FAH = 1.0).

Functionally, cancer risk is calculated using the following parameters and formulas:

Cancer Risk (per million) = CPF x Inhalation Dose x ASF x ED/AT x FAH x 106 Where:

CPF = Cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ASF = Age sensitivity factor for specified age group
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time for lifetime cancer risk (years)
FAH = Fraction of time spent at home (unitless)
Inhalation Dose = Cair x DBR* x A x (EF/365) x 10-6
Where:

Cair = concentration in air (μg/m3)
DBR = daily breathing rate (L/kg body weight-day)
8HrBR = 8-hour breathing rate (L/kg body weight-8 hours) A = Inhalation absorption factor
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
10-6 = Conversion factor
The health risk parameters used in this evaluation are summarized as follows:

Exposure Type  Infant Child Adult
Parameter Age Range  3rd
Trimester
0<2 2 < 16 16 - 30
DPM Cancer Potency Factor (mg/kg-day)-1 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 Daily Breathing Rate (L/kg-day) 80th Percentile Rate 273 758 572 261 Daily Breathing Rate (L/kg-day) 95th Percentile Rate 361 1,090 745 335 8-hour Breathing Rate (L/kg-8 hours) 95th Percentile Rate - 1,200 520 240 Inhalation Absorption Factor 1 1 1 1
Averaging Time (years) 70 70 70 70
Exposure Duration (years) 0.25 2 14 14*
Exposure Frequency (days/year) 350 350 350 350*
Age Sensitivity Factor 10 10 3 1
Fraction of Time at Home (FAH) 0.85-1.0 0.85-1.0 0.72-1.0 0.73* * An 8-hour breathing rate (8HrBR) is used for worker and school child exposures.

Non-Cancer Hazards
Non-cancer health risk is usually determined by comparing the predicted level of exposure to a chemical to the level of exposure that is not expected to cause any adverse effects (reference exposure level), even to the most susceptible people. Potential non-cancer health hazards from TAC exposure are expressed in terms of a hazard index (HI), which is the ratio of the TAC concentration to a reference exposure level (REL). OEHHA has defined acceptable concentration levels for contaminants that pose non-cancer health hazards. TAC concentrations below the REL are not expected to cause adverse health impacts, even for sensitive individuals. The total HI is calculated as the sum of the HIs for each TAC evaluated and the total HI is compared to the BAAQMD significance thresholds to determine whether a significant non-cancer health impact from a project would occur.

Typically, for residential projects located near roadways with substantial TAC emissions, the primary TAC of concern with non-cancer health effects is diesel particulate matter (DPM). For DPM, the chronic inhalation REL is 5 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3).

Annual PM2.5 Concentrations
While not a TAC, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has been identified by the BAAQMD as a pollutant with potential non-cancer health effects that should be included when evaluating potential community health impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The thresholds of significance for PM2.5 (project level and cumulative) are in terms of an increase in the annual average concentration. When considering PM2.5 impacts, the contribution from all sources of PM2.5 emissions should be included. For projects with potential impacts from nearby local roadways, the PM2.5 impacts should include those from vehicle exhaust emissions, PM2.5 generated from vehicle tire and brake wear, and fugitive emissions from re-suspended dust on the roads.

Attachment 2: CalEEMod Modeling Output
Off-road Equipment - per construction data sheet

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Adjusted CO2 Intensity Factor for 2020Land Use - from site plans. bldg footprint = ground floor acreage. Paving includes on-site and off-siteConstruction Phase - adjusted per construction data sheetOff-road Equipment - .Off-road Equipment - .

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
290 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006
64 Climate Zone 4 Operational Year 2023
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Hotel 119.00 Room 0.36 86,548.50 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 2.68 1000sqft 0.06 2,681.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 11.88 1000sqft 0.27 11,880.10 0
Floor Surface Area Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 69.00 Space 0.00 20,531.40 0

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2

Winchester Hotel_HRA - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Winchester Hotel_HRA
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 Energy Mitigation - compliance with 2019 BEESWater Mitigation - compliance with MWELOOperational Off-Road Equipment - Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps - from construction data sheet. Fire pump and generator assuming 2 hours of operation per month for maintenance Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Demolition - from construction data sheetGrading - soil export = 11,000 cyVehicle Trips - trip generation from HexagonEnergy Use - Sequestration - 30 net new treesConstruction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - tier 3, DPF level 3 engines and compliance with air district BMPs, Additional PM MitigationOff-road Equipment - .Off-road Equipment - .Off-road Equipment - .Off-road Equipment - .Trips and VMT - 1 mile nearby TAC. 409 Round cement trips added to Hauling trips of bldg construction phase tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 172,788.00 86,548.50
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.62 0.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 11,880.00 11,880.10 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 2,680.00 2,681.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 11,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 27,600.00 20,531.40
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 40.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 60.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 160.00
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 12.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 1.00tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 1.00tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 1.00 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse NumberOfEquipment 0.00 1.00tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse NumberOfEquipment 0.00 1.00tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse HorsePowerValue 0.00 150.00 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse HorsePowerValue 0.00 100.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 641.35 290 tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 30.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 4.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 4.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 1.00 8.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 1.00 8.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.97 0.36
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 2.00 Fugitive CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 12.23

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 12.23tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 12.23 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 10.80 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 10.80 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 10.80 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 10.80 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 10.80 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 10.80 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 7.30 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 10.80 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 7.30 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 7.30 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 7.30 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 7.30 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 7.30 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 7.30 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 1.00tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 818.00tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 1.00tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 1.00 Highest 0.8946 0.5702

2.2 Overall Operational
4 10-4-2021 1-3-2022 0.4131 0.3418
5 1-4-2022 4-3-2022 0.3638 0.36022 4-4-2021 7-3-2021 0.3535 0.24743 7-4-2021 10-3-2021 0.3574 0.2478 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-4-2021 4-3-2021 0.8946 0.5702

58.92 88.72 68.06 78.93 87.84 83.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

16.64 29.11 -15.62 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10

0.0747 8.3300e- 0.0000 208.4740 208.4740 0.0573 0.0000 209.9068 003

0.0830 0.0184 8.3100e003 Maximum 0.3095 1.2353 1.3719 2.3500e- 0.0267 003

0.0000 12.9675 12.9675 3.0500e003 2.2000e- 0.0000 13.0437 004 7.6000e- 004 9.8000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 7.6000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 2022 0.3095 0.0718 0.0984 1.5000e- 004

0.0747 8.3300e- 0.0000 208.4740 208.4740 0.0573 0.0000 209.9068 003

0.0830 0.0184 8.3100e003 2021 0.2116 1.2353 1.3719 2.3500e- 0.0267 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Maximum 0.3143 1.7728 1.1730 2.3500e- 0.1821 0.0772 0.2593 0.0877 0.0714 0.1591 0.0000 208.4742 208.4742 0.0573 0.0000 209.9070 003

0.0000 12.9675 12.9675 3.0500e003 2.2000e- 0.0000 13.0437 004 3.3900e- 003 3.6100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.2300e- 003 3.2900e- 003 2022 0.3143 0.0710 0.0986 1.5000e- 004 2021 0.3108 1.7728 1.1730 2.3500e- 0.1821 0.0772 0.2593 0.0877 0.0714 0.1591 0.0000 208.4742 208.4742 0.0573 0.0000 209.9070 003
Year tons/yr MT/yr
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 13.2249 0.0000 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000 32.7640 Stationary 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 1,074.137
5 1,074.1375 0.0389 0.0000 1,075.109
5 1.0290 9.6800e003 1.0387 0.2762 9.0300e- 003 Mobile 0.3102 1.3392 3.2715 0.0117 0.2852

0.0000 242.2356 242.2356 0.0121 4.6600e003 Energy 0.0151 0.1376 0.1156 8.3000e- 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 243.9267 004

0.0000 3.6200e003 3.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Area 0.3863 2.0000e- 005 1.8600e- 003 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

14.1825 1,383.670
5 1,397.8531 0.9332 8.2400e003 1,423.640 6 Total 0.7172 1.5272 3.4312 0.0128 1.0290 0.0240 1.0530 0.2762 0.0233 0.2995

0.9577 2.3030 3.2607 0.0986 2.3700e003 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.4318 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 13.2249 0.0000 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000 32.7640 Stationary 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 1,074.137
5 1,074.1375 0.0389 0.0000 1,075.109
5 1.0290 9.6800e003 1.0387 0.2762 9.0300e- 003 Mobile 0.3102 1.3392 3.2715 0.0117 0.2852

0.0000 307.2264 307.2264 0.0142 5.8700e003 Energy 0.0207 0.1880 0.1579 1.1300e- 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 309.3314 003

0.0000 3.6200e003 3.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Area 0.3863 2.0000e- 005 1.8600e- 003 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
7 Paving Paving 2/28/2022 3/25/2022 5 20
160
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/6/2021 2/25/2022 5 605 Building Construction Building Construction 4/26/2021 12/3/2021 5 40 4 Trenching Trenching 4/12/2021 4/23/2021 5 103 Grading Grading 2/15/2021 4/9/2021 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/1/2021 2/12/2021 5 10 End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/4/2021 1/29/2021 5

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
New Trees 21.2400
Total 21.2400

2.3 Vegetation
Vegetation
CO2e
Category t
on
MT

0.00 15.97 0.36 0.00 16.42 1.28 0.00 4.70 4.65 0.22 14.68 4.59 NBio-CO2 Total
CO2
CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.77 3.30 1.23 2.34
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10

14.1825 1,318.670
4 1,332.8529 0.9312 7.0300e003 1,358.226 5 Total 0.7117 1.4769 3.3889 0.0125 1.0290 0.0202 1.0492 0.2762 0.0195 0.2957

0.9577 2.2936 3.2513 0.0986 2.3700e003 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.4223 Paving Rollers 0 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Pavers 0 7.00 130 0.42Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 8.00 9 0.56Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 4.00 78 0.48 Architectural Coating Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 4.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Forklifts 2 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29Trenching Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Trenching Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 2 8.00 81 0.73
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20Acres of Paving: 0.33 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 129,823; Non-Residential Outdoor: 43,274; Striped Parking Area:

0.0117 0.0000 0.0117 1.7800e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003

0.0000 1.7800e003 Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction EquipmentUse DPF for Construction EquipmentReplace Ground CoverWater Exposed AreaWater Unpaved RoadsReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads

1.00 1.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Paving 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

1.00 1.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 2 10.00 0.00 0.00Building Construction 4 51.00 20.00 818.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

1.00 1.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Trenching 2 5.00 0.00 0.00Grading 6 15.00 0.00 1,375.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

1.00 1.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 5 13.00 0.00 0.00Demolition 7 18.00 0.00 108.00 1.00 Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle
Class
Hauling
Vehicle
Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

0.0000 30.9855 30.9855 7.1700e003 4.5700e- 0.0000 31.1647 003 1.5600e- 003 6.1300e- 003 3.5000e- 004 1.5600e- 003 1.9100e- 003 Total 8.1400e- 003 0.1742 0.2319 3.6000e- 004

0.0000 30.9855 30.9855 7.1700e003 1.5600e- 0.0000 31.1647 003 1.5600e- 003 1.5600e- 003 1.5600e- 003 Off-Road 8.1400e- 003 0.1742 0.2319 3.6000e- 004

4.5700e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
003

0.0000 4.5700e003 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.5000e- 004 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 0.8358 0.8358 9.0000e005 1.8000e- 0.0000 0.8381 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 Total 2.9000e- 004 5.5000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.0000e- 005

0.0000 0.1435 0.1435 1.0000e005 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.1436 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Worker 1.8000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 1.0800e- 003 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.6924 0.6924 8.0000e005 5.0000e- 0.0000 0.6944 005 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Hauling 1.1000e- 004 5.4200e- 003 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 30.9856 30.9856 7.1700e003 0.0117 0.0132 0.0249 1.7800e- 0.0000 31.1648 003 Total 0.0261 0.2489 0.2144 3.6000e- 0.0124 0.0142 0040.0000 30.9856 30.9856 7.1700e003 Off-Road 0.0261 0.2489 0.2144 3.6000e- 0.0132 0.0132 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 31.1648 004 PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 10.7580 10.7580 3.4800e003 0.0328 5.2800e- 0.0000 10.8450 003 0.0380 0.0168 4.8600e- 003 Total 0.0103 0.1129 0.0629 1.2000e- 0.0217 004

0.0000 10.7580 10.7580 3.4800e003 5.2800e- 0.0000 10.8450 003 5.2800e- 003 4.8600e- 003 4.8600e- 003 Off-Road 0.0103 0.1129 0.0629 1.2000e- 004 Fugitive Dust 0.0328 0.0000 0.0328 0.0168 0.0000 0.0168 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 0.8358 0.8358 9.0000e005 1.8000e- 0.0000 0.8381 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 Total 2.9000e- 004 5.5000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.0000e- 005

0.0000 0.1435 0.1435 1.0000e005 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.1436 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Worker 1.8000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 1.0800e- 003 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.6924 0.6924 8.0000e005 5.0000e- 0.0000 0.6944 005 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Hauling 1.1000e- 004 5.4200e- 003 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 10.7580 10.7580 3.4800e003 0.0128 4.8000e- 0.0000 10.8450 004 0.0133 3.2800e- 003 4.8000e- 004 3.7600e- 003 Total 3.0000e- 003 0.0619 0.0754 1.2000e- 004

0.0000 10.7580 10.7580 3.4800e003 4.8000e- 0.0000 10.8450 004 4.8000e- 004 4.8000e- 004 4.8000e- 004 Off-Road 3.0000e- 003 0.0619 0.0754 1.2000e- 004

0.0128 0.0000 0.0128 3.2800e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003

0.0000 3.2800e003 Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

5.0000e- 0.0000 0.0518 0.0518 0.0000 0.0000 0.0519
005

0.0000 5.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Total 7.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000

5.0000e- 0.0000 0.0518 0.0518 0.0000 0.0000 0.0519
005

0.0000 5.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Worker 7.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr

0.0000 9.0539 9.0539 1.0700e003 8.1000e- 0.0000 9.0805 004 6.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 2.8000e- 004 Total 1.6900e- 003 0.0692 0.0123 9.0000e- 005

0.0000 0.2391 0.2391 1.0000e005 2.2000e- 0.0000 0.2394 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 Worker 3.1000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.8100e- 003 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 8.8147 8.8147 1.0600e003 5.9000e- 0.0000 8.8411 004 6.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 Hauling 1.3800e- 003 0.0691 0.0105 9.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0467 0.4999 0.3374 6.3000e- 0.1317 0.0231 0.1547 0.0674 0.0212 0.0887 0.0000 55.7233 55.7233 0.0180 0.0000 56.1738 004
Off-Road 0.0467 0.4999 0.3374 6.3000e- 0.0231 0.0231 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 55.7233 55.7233 0.0180 0.0000 56.1738 004
Fugitive Dust 0.1317 0.0000 0.1317 0.0674 0.0000 0.0674 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.4 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

5.0000e- 0.0000 0.0518 0.0518 0.0000 0.0000 0.0519
005

0.0000 5.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Total 7.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000

5.0000e- 0.0000 0.0518 0.0518 0.0000 0.0000 0.0519
005

0.0000 5.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Worker 7.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.5 Trenching - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 9.0539 9.0539 1.0700e003 8.1000e- 0.0000 9.0805 004 6.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 2.8000e- 004 Total 1.6900e- 003 0.0692 0.0123 9.0000e- 005

0.0000 0.2391 0.2391 1.0000e005 2.2000e- 0.0000 0.2394 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 Worker 3.1000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.8100e- 003 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 8.8147 8.8147 1.0600e003 5.9000e- 0.0000 8.8411 004 6.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 Hauling 1.3800e- 003 0.0691 0.0105 9.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0514 2.2600e- 0.0000 55.7232 55.7232 0.0180 0.0000 56.1738 003

0.0536 0.0132 2.2600e003 Total 0.0156 0.3112 0.4113 6.3000e- 0.0154 004

2.2600e- 0.0000 55.7232 55.7232 0.0180 0.0000 56.1738
003

2.2600e003 2.2600e- 003 2.2600e- 003 Off-Road 0.0156 0.3112 0.4113 6.3000e- 004 Fugitive Dust 0.0514 0.0000 0.0514 0.0132 0.0000 0.0132 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 3.6337 3.6337 1.1800e003 1.8000e- 0.0000 3.6631 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 Total 1.0200e- 003 0.0210 0.0313 4.0000e- 005

0.0000 3.6337 3.6337 1.1800e003 1.8000e- 0.0000 3.6631 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 Off-Road 1.0200e- 003 0.0210 0.0313 4.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0199 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 0.0200
005

0.0000 2.0000e005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Total 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 0.0000

2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0199 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 0.0200
005

0.0000 2.0000e005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Worker 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 3.6337 3.6337 1.1800e003 1.0800e- 0.0000 3.6631 003 1.0800e- 003 9.9000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 Total 2.0800e- 003 0.0203 0.0277 4.0000e- 005

0.0000 3.6337 3.6337 1.1800e003 1.0800e- 0.0000 3.6631 003 1.0800e- 003 9.9000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 Off-Road 2.0800e- 003 0.0203 0.0277 4.0000e- 005 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.0612 0.6524 0.4359 8.3000e- 0.0336 0.0336 0.0309 0.0309 0.0000 72.9558 72.9558 0.0236 0.0000 73.5457 004
Off-Road 0.0612 0.6524 0.4359 8.3000e- 0.0336 0.0336 0.0309 0.0309 0.0000 72.9558 72.9558 0.0236 0.0000 73.5457 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.6 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0199 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 0.0200
005

0.0000 2.0000e005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Total 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 0.0000

2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0199 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 0.0200
005

0.0000 2.0000e005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Worker 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

3.4200e- 0.0000 72.9557 72.9557 0.0236 0.0000 73.5456
003

3.4200e003 3.4200e- 003 3.4200e- 003 Total 0.0204 0.4263 0.5253 8.3000e- 004

3.4200e- 0.0000 72.9557 72.9557 0.0236 0.0000 73.5456
003

3.4200e003 3.4200e- 003 3.4200e- 003 Off-Road 0.0204 0.4263 0.5253 8.3000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 21.1993 21.1993 2.1200e003 4.8400e- 0.0000 21.2522 003 1.7000e- 004 5.0100e- 003 1.3400e- 003 1.5000e- 004 1.4900e- 003 Total 7.6100e- 003 0.1474 0.0564 2.2000e- 004

0.0000 3.2521 3.2521 1.3000e004 3.0200e- 0.0000 3.2553 003 4.0000e- 005 3.0600e- 003 8.1000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 8.5000e- 004 Worker 4.1900e- 003 1.8500e- 003 0.0246 4.0000e- 005

0.0000 12.7032 12.7032 1.3600e003 1.4700e- 0.0000 12.7373 003 9.0000e- 005 1.5600e- 003 4.3000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 5.1000e- 004 Vendor 2.6000e- 003 0.1045 0.0256 1.3000e- 004

0.0000 5.2440 5.2440 6.3000e004 3.5000e- 0.0000 5.2597 004 4.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 004 Hauling 8.2000e- 004 0.0411 6.2400e- 003 5.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10

7.0000e- 0.0000 0.0797 0.0797 0.0000 0.0000 0.0798
005

0.0000 8.0000e005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Worker 1.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 3.1774 3.1774 5.9000e004 7.4000e- 0.0000 3.1923 004 7.4000e- 004 7.3000e- 004 7.3000e- 004 Total 0.1547 0.0162 0.0231 4.0000e- 005

0.0000 3.1774 3.1774 5.9000e004 7.4000e- 0.0000 3.1923 004 7.4000e- 004 7.3000e- 004 7.3000e- 004 Off-Road 1.8300e- 003 0.0162 0.0231 4.0000e- 005 Archit. Coating 0.1529 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 21.1993 21.1993 2.1200e003 4.8400e- 0.0000 21.2522 003 1.7000e- 004 5.0100e- 003 1.3400e- 003 1.5000e- 004 1.4900e- 003 Total 7.6100e- 003 0.1474 0.0564 2.2000e- 004

0.0000 3.2521 3.2521 1.3000e004 3.0200e- 0.0000 3.2553 003 4.0000e- 005 3.0600e- 003 8.1000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 8.5000e- 004 Worker 4.1900e- 003 1.8500e- 003 0.0246 4.0000e- 005

0.0000 12.7032 12.7032 1.3600e003 1.4700e- 0.0000 12.7373 003 9.0000e- 005 1.5600e- 003 4.3000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 5.1000e- 004 Vendor 2.6000e- 003 0.1045 0.0256 1.3000e- 004

0.0000 5.2440 5.2440 6.3000e004 3.5000e- 0.0000 5.2597 004 4.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 004 Hauling 8.2000e- 004 0.0411 6.2400e- 003 5.0000e- 005

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

7.0000e- 0.0000 0.0797 0.0797 0.0000 0.0000 0.0798
005

0.0000 8.0000e005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Total 1.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000

7.0000e- 0.0000 0.0797 0.0797 0.0000 0.0000 0.0798
005

0.0000 8.0000e005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Worker 1.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 3.1774 3.1774 5.9000e004 1.9000e- 0.0000 3.1923 004 1.9000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 Total 0.1537 0.0185 0.0250 4.0000e- 005

0.0000 3.1774 3.1774 5.9000e004 1.9000e- 0.0000 3.1923 004 1.9000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 Off-Road 8.1000e- 004 0.0185 0.0250 4.0000e- 005 Archit. Coating 0.1529 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

7.0000e- 0.0000 0.0797 0.0797 0.0000 0.0000 0.0798
005

0.0000 8.0000e005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Total 1.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 0.1537 0.1537 1.0000e005 1.5000e- 0.0000 0.1538 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Total 1.9000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 1.0900e- 003 0.0000

0.0000 0.1537 0.1537 1.0000e005 1.5000e- 0.0000 0.1538 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Worker 1.9000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 1.0900e- 003 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 6.3549 6.3549 1.1800e003 1.3000e- 0.0000 6.3843 003 1.3000e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 Total 0.3092 0.0300 0.0461 7.0000e- 005

0.0000 6.3549 6.3549 1.1800e003 1.3000e- 0.0000 6.3843 003 1.3000e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 Off-Road 3.4500e- 003 0.0300 0.0461 7.0000e- 005 Archit. Coating 0.3057 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10

0.0000 6.3821 6.3821 1.8600e003 2.0900e- 0.0000 6.4287 003 2.0900e- 003 1.9400e- 003 1.9400e- 003 Total 4.8200e- 003 0.0409 0.0509 8.0000e- 005 Paving 3.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004

0.0000 6.3821 6.3821 1.8600e003 2.0900e- 0.0000 6.4287 003 2.0900e- 003 1.9400e- 003 1.9400e- 003 Off-Road 4.4700e- 003 0.0409 0.0509 8.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.8 Paving - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 0.1537 0.1537 1.0000e005 1.5000e- 0.0000 0.1538 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Total 1.9000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 1.0900e- 003 0.0000

0.0000 0.1537 0.1537 1.0000e005 1.5000e- 0.0000 0.1538 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Worker 1.9000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 1.0900e- 003 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 6.3549 6.3549 1.1800e003 3.9000e- 0.0000 6.3843 004 3.9000e- 004 3.9000e- 004 3.9000e- 004 Total 0.3074 0.0370 0.0499 7.0000e- 005

0.0000 6.3549 6.3549 1.1800e003 3.9000e- 0.0000 6.3843 004 3.9000e- 004 3.9000e- 004 3.9000e- 004 Off-Road 1.6200e- 003 0.0370 0.0499 7.0000e- 005 Archit. Coating 0.3057 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0000 6.3821 6.3821 1.8600e003 3.6000e- 0.0000 6.4287 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 Total 1.8700e- 003 0.0347 0.0468 8.0000e- 005 Paving 3.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004

0.0000 6.3821 6.3821 1.8600e003 3.6000e- 0.0000 6.4287 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 Off-Road 1.5200e- 003 0.0347 0.0468 8.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

7.0000e- 0.0000 0.0768 0.0768 0.0000 0.0000 0.0769
005

0.0000 8.0000e005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Total 9.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 0.0000

7.0000e- 0.0000 0.0768 0.0768 0.0000 0.0000 0.0769
005

0.0000 8.0000e005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Worker 9.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 1,455.37 1,455.37 1455.37 2,765,102 2,765,102
Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

0.0000 1,074.137
5 1,074.1375 0.0389 0.0000 1,075.109
5 1.0290 9.6800e003 1.0387 0.2762 9.0300e- 003 Unmitigated 0.3102 1.3392 3.2715 0.0117 0.2852

0.0000 1,074.137
5 1,074.1375 0.0389 0.0000 1,075.109
5 1.0290 9.6800e003 1.0387 0.2762 9.0300e- 003 Mitigated 0.3102 1.3392 3.2715 0.0117 0.2852 NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10

7.0000e- 0.0000 0.0768 0.0768 0.0000 0.0000 0.0769
005

0.0000 8.0000e005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Total 9.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 0.0000

7.0000e- 0.0000 0.0768 0.0768 0.0000 0.0000 0.0769
005

0.0000 8.0000e005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Worker 9.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10

92.4004 92.4004 9.2400e003 1.9100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 93.2011 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 Fugitive Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ROG NOx CO SO2

0.000891 0.000749

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832

0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749

0.000891 0.000749
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 Hotel 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832

0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749

SBUS MH
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix

0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00

61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Other Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or CW
Total 1,455.37 1,455.37 1,455.37 2,765,102 2,765,102
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 149.8352 2.8700e003 2.7500e- 003 150.7256
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 149.8352

0.0000
Hotel 2.80781e+
006

0.0151 0.1376 0.1156 8.3000e004 0.0105

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
205.8644
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2

0.0143 0.0000 204.6483 204.6483 3.9200e003 3.7500e- 003 1.1300e- 003 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0207 0.1880 0.1579

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 204.6483 3.9200e003 3.7500e- 003 205.8644
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.6483

0.0000
Hotel 3.83496e+
006

0.0207 0.1880 0.1579 1.1300e003 0.0143
Enclosed Parking 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
204.6483 204.6483 3.9200e003 3.7500e- 003 205.8644

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000

2.8700e003 2.7500e- 003 150.7256
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0207 0.1880 0.1579 1.1300e003

0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 149.8352 149.8352
103.4670
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0151 0.1376 0.1156 8.3000e004 0.0105 0.0105

0.0000 0.0000 102.5781 102.5781 0.0103 2.1200e003 Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

12.7599
Hotel 606272 79.7501 7.9800e003 1.6500e- 003 80.4412
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
96169.1 12.6503 1.2700e003 2.6000e- 004
103.4670
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 102.5781 0.0103 2.1200e003

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

15.9635
Hotel 659500 86.7518 8.6800e003 1.7900e- 003 87.5035
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
120314 15.8263 1.5800e003 3.3000e- 004
150.7256

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0105 0.0000 149.8352 149.8352 2.8700e003 2.7500e- 003 8.3000e- 004 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0151 0.1376 0.1156
Other Non-Asphalt 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 3.6200e003 3.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Total 0.3863 2.0000e- 005 1.8600e- 003 0.0000

0.0000 3.6200e003 3.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Landscaping 1.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 1.8600e- 003 0.0000 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products

0.3403
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.0459
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 3.6200e003 3.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Unmitigated 0.3863 2.0000e- 005 1.8600e- 003 0.0000

0.0000 3.6200e003 3.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Mitigated 0.3863 2.0000e- 005 1.8600e- 003 0.0000 NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

93.2011

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Total 92.4004 9.2500e003 1.9100e- 003

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated 3.2607 0.0986 2.3700e003 6.4318
Category t
on
MT/yr
Mitigated 3.2513 0.0986 2.3700e003 6.4223

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000 3.6200e003 3.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Total 0.3863 2.0000e- 005 1.8600e- 003 0.0000

0.0000 3.6200e003 3.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Landscaping 1.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 1.8600e- 003 0.0000 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products

0.3403
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.0459
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

6.4223

8.0 Waste Detail
Total 3.2513 0.0986 2.3700e003

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Hotel 3.01865 /

0.314945

3.2513 0.0986 2.3700e003 6.4223
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.4318
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 3.2607 0.0986 2.3700e003

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Hotel 3.01865 /

0.335405

3.2607 0.0986 2.3700e003 6.4318
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

32.7640
Mitigated
Total 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Hotel 65.15 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000 32.7640
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000 32.7640
ton
MT/yr
Mitigated 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000 32.7640

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

10.1 Stationary Sources
Unmitigated/Mitigated
Diesel
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Fire Pump 1 0 0 100 0.73
Load Factor Fuel Type
Emergency Generator 1 0 0 150 0.73 Diesel
Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power

32.7640

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year
Total 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000

0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Hotel 65.15 13.2249 0.7816 0.0000 32.7640
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
t
on
MT

11.2 Net New Trees
Species Class
Number of
Trees
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
CO2e
Category t
on
MT
Unmitigated 21.2400 0.0000 0.0000 21.2400

11.0 Vegetation
Total CO2 CH4 N2O
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Fire Pump - Diesel 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 (100 - 175 HP)

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CO2e
Equipment Type tons/yr MT/yr
Emergency
Generator - Diesel
(100 - 175 HP)

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 SO2 Fugitive Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 ROG NOx CO

21.2400
Total 21.2400 0.0000 0.0000 21.2400
Miscellaneous 30 21.2400 0.0000 0.0000
Attachment 3: Construction Health Risk Calculations
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA
DPM Construction Emissions and Modeling Emission Rates
Emissions
per
Construction DPM Source No. DPM Emissions Point Source
Year Activity (ton/year) Type Sources (lb/yr) (lb/hr) (g/s) (g/s) 2021 Construction 0.0772 Point 88 154.4 0.04230 5.33E-03 6.06E-05 2022 Construction 0.0034 Point 88 6.8 0.00186 2.34E-04 2.66E-06 Total 0.0806 161.2 0.0442 0.0056
Emissions assumed to be evenly distributed over each construction areas hr/day = 10 (7am - 5pm)
days/yr = 365
hours/year = 3650
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA
PM2.5 Fugitive Dust Construction Emissions for Modeling DPM
Modeled Emission
Construction Area PM2.5 Emissions Area Rate
Year Activity Source (ton/year) (lb/yr) (lb/hr) (g/s) (m2 ) g/s/m2
2021 Construction CON_FUG 0.0877 175.4 0.04805 6.05E-03 2796.352 2.17E-06 2022 Construction CON_FUG 0.0001 0.1 0.00003 4.14E-06 2796.352 1.48E-09 Total 0.0878 175.5 0.0481 0.0061
Emissions assumed to be evenly distributed over each construction areas hr/day = 10 (7am - 5pm)
days/yr = 365
hours/year = 3650
DPM Construction Emissions and Modeling Emission Rates - With Mitigation Emissions
per
Construction DPM Source No. DPM Emissions Point Source
Year Activity (ton/year) Type Sources (lb/yr) (lb/hr) (g/s) (g/s) 2021 Construction 0.0083 Point 88 16.7 0.00456 5.75E-04 6.54E-06 2022 Construction 0.0008 Point 88 1.5 0.00042 5.25E-05 5.96E-07 Total 0.0091 18.2 0.0050 0.0006
Emissions assumed to be evenly distributed over each construction areas hr/day = 10 (7am - 5pm)
days/yr = 365
hours/year = 3650
PM2.5 Fugitive Dust Construction Emissions for Modeling - With Mitigation DPM
Modeled Emission
Construction Area PM2.5 Emissions Area Rate
Year Activity Source (ton/year) (lb/yr) (lb/hr) (g/s) (m2 ) g/s/m2
2021 Construction CON_FUG 0.0184 36.8 0.01008 1.27E-03 2796.352 4.54E-07 2022 Construction CON_FUG 0.0001 0.1 0.00003 4.14E-06 2796.352 1.48E-09 Total 0.0185 36.9 0.0101 0.0013
Emissions assumed to be evenly distributed over each construction areas hr/day = 10 (7am - 5pm)
days/yr = 365
hours/year = 3650
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA - Construction Health Impact Summary Maximum Impacts at MEI Location - Without Mitigation
Unmitigated Emissions
Maximum Concentrations Maximum
Exhaust Fugitive Cancer Risk Hazard Annual PM2.5
Emissions PM10/DPM PM2.5 (per million) Index Concentration Year (μg/m3
) (μg/m3) Infant/Child (-) (μg/m3)
2021 0.1791 1.2775 31.84 0.04 1.46
2022 0.0079 0.0009 1.29 0.00 0.01
Total -- 33.1 --
Maximum 0.1791 1.2775 - 0.04 1.46
Maximum Impacts at MEI Location - With Mitigation
Mitigated Emissions
Maximum Concentrations Maximum
Exhaust Fugitive Cancer Risk Hazard Annual PM2.5
Emissions PM10/DPM PM2.5 (per million) Index Concentration Year (μg/m3
) (μg/m3) Infant/Child (-) (μg/m3)
2021 0.0193 0.2673 3.44 0.004 0.29
2022 0.0018 0.0009 0.29 0.0004 0.00
Total -- 3.7 --
Maximum 0.0193 0.2673 - 0.004 0.29
- Tier 3 DPF 3 Engine Mitigation
Maximum Impacts at A Grace Subacute Nursing Home - Without Mitigation Unmitigated Emissions
Maximum Concentrations Maximum
Exhaust Fugitive Cancer Risk Hazard Annual PM2.5
Emissions PM10/DPM PM2.5 (per million) Index Concentration Year (μg/m3
) (μg/m3) Infant/Child (-) (μg/m3)
2021 0.1940 1.1862 0.56 0.04 1.33
2022 0.0085 0.0008 0.02 0.002 0.01
Total -- 0.6 --
Maximum 0.1940 1.1862 - 0.04 1.33
Maximum Impacts at A Grace Subacute Nursing Home - With Mitigation Mitigated Emissions
Maximum Concentrations Maximum
Exhaust Fugitive Cancer Risk Hazard Annual PM2.5
Emissions PM10/DPM PM2.5 (per million) Index Concentration Year (μg/m3
) (μg/m3) Infant/Child (-) (μg/m3)
2021 0.0209 0.2482 0.06 0.004 0.26
2022 0.0019 0.0008 0.01 0.0004 0.00
Total -- 0.1 --
Maximum 0.0209 0.2482 - 0.004 0.26
- Tier 3 DPF 3 Engine Mitigation
Maximum Impacts at Castlemont Elementary School
Unmitigated Emissions
Maximum Concentrations Maximum
Exhaust Fugitive Child Hazard Annual PM2.5
Construction PM2.5/DPM PM2.5 Cancer Risk Index Concentration Year (μg/m3
) (μg/m3) (per million) (-) (μg/m3)
2021 0.0292 0.0433 2.06 0.01 0.07
2022 0.0013 0.00003 0.09 0.0003 0.001
Total -- 2.2 --
Maximum 0.0292 0.0433 - 0.01 0.07
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA - Construction Impacts - Without Mitigation Maximum DPM Cancer Risk and PM2.5 Calculations From Construction Impacts at Off-Site MEI Location - 1.5 meter receptor height Cancer Risk (per million) =CPF x Inhalation Dose x ASF x ED/AT x FAH x 1.0E6 Where: CPF = Cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ASF = Age sensitivity factor for specified age group
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time for lifetime cancer risk (years)
FAH = Fraction of time spent at home (unitless)
Inhalation Dose = Cair x DBR x A x (EF/365) x 10-6
Where: Cair = concentration in air (μg/m3)
DBR = daily breathing rate (L/kg body weight-day)
A = Inhalation absorption factor
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
10-6 = Conversion factor
Values
Infant/Child Adult
Age --> 3rd Trimester 0 - 2 2 - 16 16 - 30
Parameter
ASF = 10 10 3 1
CPF = 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00
DBR* = 361 1090 572 261
A = 1 1 1 1
EF = 350 350 350 350
AT = 70 70 70 70
FAH = 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73
* 95th percentile breathing rates for infants and 80th percentile for children and adults Construction Cancer Risk by Year - Maximum Impact Receptor Location Infant/Child - Exposure Information Infant/Child Adult - Exposure Information Adult Exposure Age Cancer Modeled Age Cancer Maximum
Exposure Duration DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk Hazard Fugitive Total Year (years) Age Year Annual Factor (per million) Year Annual Factor (per million) Index PM2.5 PM2.5 0 0.25 -0.25 - 0* 2021 0.1791 10 2.43 2021 0.1791 - -
1 1 0 - 1 2021 0.1791 10 29.41 2021 0.1791 1 0.51 0.036 1.2775 1.4565 2 1 1 - 2 2022 0.0079 10 1.29 2022 0.0079 1 0.02 0.002 0.0009 0.0087 3 1 2 - 3 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
4 1 3 - 4 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
5 1 4 - 5 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
6 1 5 - 6 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
7 1 6 - 7 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
8 1 7 - 8 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
9 1 8 - 9 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
10 1 9 - 10 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
11 1 10 - 11 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
12 1 11 - 12 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
13 1 12 - 13 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
14 1 13 - 14 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
15 1 14 - 15 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
16 1 15 - 16 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
17 1 16-17 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
18 1 17-18 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
19 1 18-19 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
20 1 19-20 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
21 1 20-21 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
22 1 21-22 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
23 1 22-23 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
24 1 23-24 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
25 1 24-25 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
26 1 25-26 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
27 1 26-27 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
28 1 27-28 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
29 1 28-29 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
30 1 29-30 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
Total Increased Cancer Risk 33.1 0.54
* Third trimester of pregnancy
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA - Construction Impacts - Without Mitigation Maximum DPM Cancer Risk and PM2.5 Calculations From Construction Impacts at Off-Site MEI Location - 4.5 meter receptor height Cancer Risk (per million) =CPF x Inhalation Dose x ASF x ED/AT x FAH x 1.0E6 Where: CPF = Cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ASF = Age sensitivity factor for specified age group
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time for lifetime cancer risk (years)
FAH = Fraction of time spent at home (unitless)
Inhalation Dose = Cair x DBR x A x (EF/365) x 10-6
Where: Cair = concentration in air (μg/m3)
DBR = daily breathing rate (L/kg body weight-day)
A = Inhalation absorption factor
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
10-6 = Conversion factor
Values
Infant/Child Adult
Age --> 3rd Trimester 0 - 2 2 - 16 16 - 30
Parameter
ASF = 10 10 3 1
CPF = 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00
DBR* = 361 1090 572 261
A = 1 1 1 1
EF = 350 350 350 350
AT = 70 70 70 70
FAH = 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73
* 95th percentile breathing rates for infants and 80th percentile for children and adults Construction Cancer Risk by Year - Maximum Impact Receptor Location Infant/Child - Exposure Information Infant/Child Adult - Exposure Information Adult Exposure Age Cancer Modeled Age Cancer Maximum
Exposure Duration DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk Hazard Fugitive Total Year (years) Age Year Annual Factor (per million) Year Annual Factor (per million) Index PM2.5 PM2.5 0 0.25 -0.25 - 0* 2021 0.0172 10 0.23 2021 0.0172 - -
1 1 0 - 1 2021 0.0172 10 2.83 2021 0.0172 1 0.05 0.003 0.0257 0.0430 2 1 1 - 2 2022 0.0008 10 0.12 2022 0.0008 1 0.00 0.000 0.0000 0.0008 3 1 2 - 3 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
4 1 3 - 4 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
5 1 4 - 5 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
6 1 5 - 6 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
7 1 6 - 7 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
8 1 7 - 8 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
9 1 8 - 9 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
10 1 9 - 10 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
11 1 10 - 11 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
12 1 11 - 12 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
13 1 12 - 13 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
14 1 13 - 14 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
15 1 14 - 15 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
16 1 15 - 16 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
17 1 16-17 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
18 1 17-18 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
19 1 18-19 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
20 1 19-20 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
21 1 20-21 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
22 1 21-22 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
23 1 22-23 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
24 1 23-24 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
25 1 24-25 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
26 1 25-26 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
27 1 26-27 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
28 1 27-28 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
29 1 28-29 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
30 1 29-30 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
Total Increased Cancer Risk 3.2 0.05
* Third trimester of pregnancy
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA - Construction Impacts - With Mitigation Maximum DPM Cancer Risk and PM2.5 Calculations From Construction Impacts at Off-Site MEI Location - 1.5 meter receptor height Cancer Risk (per million) =CPF x Inhalation Dose x ASF x ED/AT x FAH x 1.0E6 Where: CPF = Cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ASF = Age sensitivity factor for specified age group
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time for lifetime cancer risk (years)
FAH = Fraction of time spent at home (unitless)
Inhalation Dose = Cair x DBR x A x (EF/365) x 10-6
Where: Cair = concentration in air (μg/m3)
DBR = daily breathing rate (L/kg body weight-day)
A = Inhalation absorption factor
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
10-6 = Conversion factor
Values
Infant/Child Adult
Age --> 3rd Trimester 0 - 2 2 - 16 16 - 30
Parameter
ASF = 10 10 3 1
CPF = 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00
DBR* = 361 1090 572 261
A = 1 1 1 1
EF = 350 350 350 350
AT = 70 70 70 70
FAH = 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73
* 95th percentile breathing rates for infants and 80th percentile for children and adults Construction Cancer Risk by Year - Maximum Impact Receptor Location Infant/Child - Exposure Information Infant/Child Adult - Exposure Information Adult Exposure Age Cancer Modeled Age Cancer Maximum
Exposure Duration DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk Hazard Fugitive Total Year (years) Age Year Annual Factor (per million) Year Annual Factor (per million) Index PM2.5 PM2.5 0 0.25 -0.25 - 0* 2021 0.0193 10 0.26 2021 0.0193 - -
1 1 0 - 1 2021 0.0193 10 3.17 2021 0.0193 1 0.06 0.004 0.2673 0.2866 2 1 1 - 2 2022 0.0018 10 0.29 2022 0.0018 1 0.01 0.0004 0.0009 0.0026 3 1 2 - 3 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
4 1 3 - 4 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
5 1 4 - 5 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
6 1 5 - 6 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
7 1 6 - 7 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
8 1 7 - 8 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
9 1 8 - 9 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
10 1 9 - 10 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
11 1 10 - 11 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
12 1 11 - 12 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
13 1 12 - 13 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
14 1 13 - 14 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
15 1 14 - 15 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
16 1 15 - 16 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
17 1 16-17 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
18 1 17-18 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
19 1 18-19 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
20 1 19-20 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
21 1 20-21 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
22 1 21-22 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
23 1 22-23 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
24 1 23-24 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
25 1 24-25 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
26 1 25-26 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
27 1 26-27 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
28 1 27-28 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
29 1 28-29 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
30 1 29-30 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
Total Increased Cancer Risk 3.7 0.06
* Third trimester of pregnancy
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA - Construction Impacts - Without Mitigation Maximum DPM Cancer Risk and PM2.5 Calculations From Construction Impacts at A Grace Subacute & Skilled Care Nursing Home (Adult Seniors Only) - 1.5 meter receptor height Cancer Risk (per million) = CPF x Inhalation Dose x ASF x ED/AT x FAH x 1.0E6 Where: CPF = Cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ASF = Age sensitivity factor for specified age group
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time for lifetime cancer risk (years)
FAH = Fraction of time spent at home (unitless)
Inhalation Dose = Cair x DBR x A x (EF/365) x 10-6
Where: Cair = concentration in air (μg/m3)
DBR = daily breathing rate (L/kg body weight-day)
A = Inhalation absorption factor
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
10-6 = Conversion factor
Values
Infant/Child Adult
Age --> 3rd Trimester 0 - 2 2 - 16 16 - 30
Parameter
ASF = 10 10 3 1
CPF = 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00
DBR* = 361 1090 572 261
A = 1 1 1 1
EF = 350 350 350 350
AT = 70 70 70 70
FAH = 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73
* 95th percentile breathing rates for infants and 80th percentile for children and adults Construction Cancer Risk by Year - Maximum Impact Receptor Location Adult - Exposure Information Adult
Exposure Modeled Age Cancer Maximum
Exposure Duration DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk Hazard Fugitive Total Year (years) Age Year Annual Factor (per million) Index PM2.5 PM2.5 1 1 55-56 2021 0.1940 1 0.56 0.039 1.1862 1.3302
2 1 56-57 2022 0.0085 1 0.02 0.002 0.0008 0.0093
Total Increased Cancer Risk 0.58
* Assumed Adult Seniors Only
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA - Construction Impacts - With Mitigation Maximum DPM Cancer Risk and PM2.5 Calculations From Construction Impacts at A Grace Subacute & Skilled Care Nursing Home (Adult Seniors Only) - 1.5 meter receptor height Cancer Risk (per million) = CPF x Inhalation Dose x ASF x ED/AT x FAH x 1.0E6 Where: CPF = Cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ASF = Age sensitivity factor for specified age group
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time for lifetime cancer risk (years)
FAH = Fraction of time spent at home (unitless)
Inhalation Dose = Cair x DBR x A x (EF/365) x 10-6
Where: Cair = concentration in air (μg/m3)
DBR = daily breathing rate (L/kg body weight-day)
A = Inhalation absorption factor
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
10-6 = Conversion factor
Values
Infant/Child Adult
Age --> 3rd Trimester 0 - 2 2 - 16 16 - 30
Parameter
ASF = 10 10 3 1
CPF = 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00
DBR* = 361 1090 572 261
A = 1 1 1 1
EF = 350 350 350 350
AT = 70 70 70 70
FAH = 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73
* 95th percentile breathing rates for infants and 80th percentile for children and adults Construction Cancer Risk by Year - Maximum Impact Receptor Location Adult - Exposure Information Adult
Exposure Modeled Age Cancer Maximum
Exposure Duration DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk Hazard Fugitive Total Year (years) Age Year Annual Factor (per million) Index PM2.5 PM2.5 1 1 55-56 2021 0.0209 1 0.06 0.004 0.2482 0.2637
2 1 56-57 2022 0.0019 1 0.01 0.0004 0.0008 0.0025
Total Increased Cancer Risk 0.07
* Assumed Adult Seniors Only
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA - Construction Impacts - Without Mitigation Maximum DPM Cancer Risk and PM2.5 Calculations From Construction Impacts at Castlemont Elementary School (3+ years old) - 1.0 meters - Child Exposure Student Cancer Risk (per million) = CPF x Inhalation Dose x ASF x ED/AT x 1.0E6 Where: CPF = Cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ASF = Age sensitivity factor for specified age group
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time for lifetime cancer risk (years)
Inhalation Dose = Cair x SAF x 8-Hr BR x A x (EF/365) x 10-6 Where: Cair = concentration in air (μg/m3)
SAF = Student Adjustment Factor (unitless)
= (24 hrs/8 hrs) x (7 days/7 days) = 3
8-Hr BR = Eight-hour breathing rate (L/kg body weight-per 8 hrs) A = Inhalation absorption factor
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
10-6 = Conversion factor
Values
Infant School Child Adult
Age --> 0 - <2 2 - <16 16 - 30
Parameter
ASF = 10 3 1
CPF = 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00
8-Hr BR* = 1200 520 240
A = 1 1 1
EF = 350 350 250
AT = 70 70 70
SAF = 3.00 3.00 1.00
* 95th percentile 8-hr breathing rates for moderate intensity activities Construction Cancer Risk by Year - Maximum Impact Receptor Location Child - Exposure Information Child
Exposure Age* Cancer
Exposure Duration DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk Hazard Fugitive Total Year (years) Age Year Annual Factor (per million) Index PM2.5 PM2.5 1 1 3 - 4 2021 0.0292 3 2.1 0.006 0.0433 0.0725
2 1 4 - 5 2022 0.0013 3 0.1 0.0003 0.00003 0.0013
Total Increased Cancer Risk 2.2
* Children assumed to be 3 years of age or older
Maximum
Attachment 4: Community Risk Calculations and Screening S. Winchester Boulevard Traffic Emissions and Health Risk Calculations File Name: Winchester Hotel Santa Clara (SF) ‐ 2023 ‐ Annual.EF CT‐EMFAC2017 Version: 1.0.2.27401
Run Date: 8/12/2020 15:49
Area: Santa Clara (SF)
Analysis Year: 2023
Season: Annual
======================================================================= Vehicle Category VMT Fraction
Diesel VMT
Fraction
Gas VMT
Fraction
Across Category
Within
Category
Within
Category
Truck 1 0.026 0.487 0.513
Truck 2 0.036 0.938 0.047
Non‐Truck 0.938 0.014 0.958
======================================================================= Road Type: Major/Collector
Silt Loading Factor:            CARB 0.032 g/m2
Precipitation Correction:            CARB P = 64 days N = 365 days ======================================================================= Fleet Average Running Exhaust Emission Factors (grams/veh‐mile) Pollutant Name    <= 5 mph      10 mph      15mph      20 mph      25mph      30mph      35mph      40mph      45 mph PM2.5 0.009457 0.006198 0.004236 0.003051 0.002336 0.001907 0.001664 0.001551 0.001539 TOG 0.200703 0.131848 0.088154 0.062068 0.046876 0.037363 0.031255 0.027433 0.02527 Diesel PM 0.001333 0.001078 0.000832 0.000664 0.000572 0.000533 0.000535 0.000575 0.000649 ======================================================================= Fleet Average Running Loss Emission Factors (grams/veh‐hour) Pollutant Name Emission Factor
TOG 1.369896
======================================================================= Fleet Average Tire Wear Factors (grams/veh‐mile)
Pollutant Name Emission Factor
PM2.5 0.002188
======================================================================= Fleet Average Brake Wear Factors (grams/veh‐mile)
Pollutant Name Emission Factor
PM2.5 0.017348
======================================================================= Fleet Average Road Dust Factors (grams/veh‐mile)
Pollutant Name Emission Factor
PM2.5 0.016823
=============================END======================================= Winchester Hotel- Offsite Residential
Cumulative Operation - S. Winchester Boulevard
DPM Modeling - Roadway Links, Traffic Volumes, and DPM Emissions Year = 2023
Road Link Description Direction
No.

Lanes
Link
Length
(m)
Link
Length
(mi)
Link
Width
(m)
Link
Width
(ft)
Release
Height
( m)
Average
Speed
(mph)
Average
Vehicles
per Day
DPM_SB_WIN
S. Winchester Boulevard
Southbound SB 3 671.2 0.42 17.0 55.7 3.4 40 11,401
DPM_NB_WN
S. Winchester Boulevard
Northbound NB 2 672.4 0.42 13.3 43.7 3.4 40 11,401
Total 22,802
Emission Factors
Speed Category 1 2 34
Travel Speed (mph) 40
Emissions per Vehicle (g/VMT) 0.00058
Emisson Factors from CT-EMFAC2017
2023 Hourly Traffic Volumes and DPM Emissions - DPM_SB_WIN Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s
1 3.91% 446 2.97E-05 9 6.50% 741 4.94E-05 17 5.58% 636 4.24E-05 2 2.59% 295 1.97E-05 10 7.36% 839 5.59E-05 18 3.28% 374 2.49E-05 3 2.88% 328 2.18E-05 11 6.33% 721 4.80E-05 19 2.36% 269 1.79E-05 4 3.34% 380 2.53E-05 12 6.84% 780 5.20E-05 20 0.92% 105 6.99E-06 5 2.19% 249 1.66E-05 13 6.15% 701 4.67E-05 21 2.99% 341 2.27E-05 6 3.39% 387 2.58E-05 14 6.15% 701 4.67E-05 22 4.14% 472 3.14E-05 7 5.98% 682 4.54E-05 15 5.23% 597 3.97E-05 23 2.47% 282 1.88E-05 8 4.66% 531 3.54E-05 16 3.91% 446 2.97E-05 24 0.86% 98 6.55E-06 Total 11,401
2023 Hourly Traffic Volumes Per Direction and DPM Emissions - DPM_NB_WN Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile
1 3.91% 446 2.98E-05 9 6.50% 741 4.94E-05 17 5.58% 636 4.24E-05 2 2.59% 295 1.97E-05 10 7.36% 839 5.60E-05 18 3.28% 374 2.49E-05 3 2.88% 328 2.19E-05 11 6.33% 721 4.81E-05 19 2.36% 269 1.79E-05 4 3.34% 380 2.54E-05 12 6.84% 780 5.21E-05 20 0.92% 105 7.00E-06 5 2.19% 249 1.66E-05 13 6.15% 701 4.68E-05 21 2.99% 341 2.28E-05 6 3.39% 387 2.58E-05 14 6.15% 701 4.68E-05 22 4.14% 472 3.15E-05 7 5.98% 682 4.55E-05 15 5.23% 597 3.98E-05 23 2.47% 282 1.88E-05 8 4.66% 531 3.54E-05 16 3.91% 446 2.98E-05 24 0.86% 98 6.56E-06 Total 11,401
Winchester Hotel- Offsite Residential
Cumulative Operation - S. Winchester Boulevard
PM2.5 Modeling - Roadway Links, Traffic Volumes, and PM2.5 Emissions Year = 2023
Road Link Description Direction
No.

Lanes
Link
Length
(m)
Link
Length
(mi)
Link
Width
(m)
Link
Width
(ft)
Release
Height
( m)
Average
Speed
(mph)
Average
Vehicles
per Day
PM2.5_SB_WIN
S. Winchester Boulevard
Southbound SB 3 671.2 0.42 17.0 56 1.3 40 11,401
PM2.5_NB_WIN
S. Winchester Boulevard
Northbound NB 2 672.4 0.42 13.3 44 1.3 40 11,401
Total 22,802
Emission Factors - PM2.5
Speed Category 1 234
Travel Speed (mph) 40
Emissions per Vehicle (g/VMT) 0.001551
Emisson Factors from CT-EMFAC2017
2023 Hourly Traffic Volumes and PM2.5 Emissions - PM2.5_SB_WIN Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s
1 1.15% 131 2.36E-05 9 7.11% 811 1.46E-04 17 7.38% 842 1.51E-04 2 0.42% 48 8.55E-06 10 4.39% 501 9.00E-05 18 8.17% 932 1.67E-04 3 0.41% 46 8.35E-06 11 4.66% 532 9.55E-05 19 5.70% 649 1.17E-04 4 0.26% 30 5.39E-06 12 5.89% 671 1.21E-04 20 4.27% 487 8.76E-05 5 0.50% 57 1.03E-05 13 6.15% 701 1.26E-04 21 3.26% 372 6.68E-05 6 0.90% 103 1.85E-05 14 6.04% 688 1.24E-04 22 3.30% 376 6.76E-05 7 3.79% 432 7.77E-05 15 7.01% 799 1.44E-04 23 2.46% 280 5.04E-05 8 7.76% 885 1.59E-04 16 7.14% 813 1.46E-04 24 1.86% 213 3.82E-05 Total 11,401
2023 Hourly Traffic Volumes Per Direction and PM2.5 Emissions - PM2.5_NB_WIN Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile
1 1.15% 131 2.36E-05 9 7.11% 811 1.46E-04 17 7.38% 842 1.52E-04 2 0.42% 48 8.57E-06 10 4.39% 501 9.01E-05 18 8.17% 932 1.68E-04 3 0.41% 46 8.37E-06 11 4.66% 532 9.57E-05 19 5.70% 649 1.17E-04 4 0.26% 30 5.40E-06 12 5.89% 671 1.21E-04 20 4.27% 487 8.77E-05 5 0.50% 57 1.03E-05 13 6.15% 701 1.26E-04 21 3.26% 372 6.69E-05 6 0.90% 103 1.86E-05 14 6.04% 688 1.24E-04 22 3.30% 376 6.77E-05 7 3.79% 432 7.78E-05 15 7.01% 799 1.44E-04 23 2.46% 280 5.05E-05 8 7.76% 885 1.59E-04 16 7.14% 813 1.46E-04 24 1.86% 213 3.83E-05 Total 11,401
Winchester Hotel- Offsite Residential
Cumulative Operation - S. Winchester Boulevard
TOG Exhaust Modeling - Roadway Links, Traffic Volumes, and TOG Exhaust Emissions Year = 2023
Road Link Description Direction
No.

Lanes
Link
Length
(m)
Link
Length
(mi)
Link
Width
(m)
Link
Width
(ft)
Release
Height
( m)
Average
Speed
(mph)
Average
Vehicles
per Day
TEXH_SB_WIN
S. Winchester Boulevard
Southbound SB 3 671.2 0.42 17.0 56 1.3 40 11,401
TEXH_NB_WIN
S. Winchester Boulevard
Northbound NB 2 672.4 0.42 13.3 44 1.3 40 11,401
Total 22,802
Emission Factors - TOG Exhaust
Speed Category 1 234
Travel Speed (mph) 40
Emissions per Vehicle (g/VMT) 0.02743
Emisson Factors from CT-EMFAC2017
2023 Hourly Traffic Volumes and TOG Exhaust Emissions - TEXH_SB_WIN Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s
1 1.15% 131 4.17E-04 9 7.11% 811 2.58E-03 17 7.38% 842 2.68E-03 2 0.42% 48 1.51E-04 10 4.39% 501 1.59E-03 18 8.17% 932 2.96E-03 3 0.41% 46 1.48E-04 11 4.66% 532 1.69E-03 19 5.70% 649 2.06E-03 4 0.26% 30 9.54E-05 12 5.89% 671 2.13E-03 20 4.27% 487 1.55E-03 5 0.50% 57 1.81E-04 13 6.15% 701 2.23E-03 21 3.26% 372 1.18E-03 6 0.90% 103 3.28E-04 14 6.04% 688 2.19E-03 22 3.30% 376 1.20E-03 7 3.79% 432 1.37E-03 15 7.01% 799 2.54E-03 23 2.46% 280 8.91E-04 8 7.76% 885 2.81E-03 16 7.14% 813 2.59E-03 24 1.86% 213 6.75E-04 Total 11,401
2023 Hourly Traffic Volumes Per Direction and TOG Exhaust Emissions - TEXH_NB_WIN Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile
1 1.15% 131 4.18E-04 9 7.11% 811 2.58E-03 17 7.38% 842 2.68E-03 2 0.42% 48 1.52E-04 10 4.39% 501 1.59E-03 18 8.17% 932 2.97E-03 3 0.41% 46 1.48E-04 11 4.66% 532 1.69E-03 19 5.70% 649 2.07E-03 4 0.26% 30 9.55E-05 12 5.89% 671 2.14E-03 20 4.27% 487 1.55E-03 5 0.50% 57 1.82E-04 13 6.15% 701 2.23E-03 21 3.26% 372 1.18E-03 6 0.90% 103 3.28E-04 14 6.04% 688 2.19E-03 22 3.30% 376 1.20E-03 7 3.79% 432 1.38E-03 15 7.01% 799 2.55E-03 23 2.46% 280 8.93E-04 8 7.76% 885 2.82E-03 16 7.14% 813 2.59E-03 24 1.86% 213 6.77E-04 Total 11,401
Winchester Hotel- Offsite Residential
Cumulative Operation - S. Winchester Boulevard
TOG Evaporative Emissions Modeling - Roadway Links, Traffic Volumes, and TOG Evaporative Emissions Year = 2023
Road Link Description Direction
No.

Lanes
Link
Length
(m)
Link
Length
(mi)
Link
Width
(m)
Link
Width
(ft)
Release
Height
( m)
Average
Speed
(mph)
Average
Vehicles
per Day
TEVAP_SB_WIN
S. Winchester Boulevard
Southbound SB 3 671.2 0.42 17.0 56 1.3 40 11,401
TEVAP_NB_WIN
S. Winchester Boulevard
Northbound NB 2 672.4 0.42 13.3 44 1.3 40 11,401
Total 22,802
Emission Factors - PM2.5 - Evaporative TOG
Speed Category 1 234
Travel Speed (mph) 40
Emissions per Vehicle per Hour (g/hour) 1.36990
Emissions per Vehicle per Mile (g/VMT) 0.03425
Emisson Factors from CT-EMFAC2017
2023 Hourly Traffic Volumes and TOG Evaporative Emissions - TEVAP_SB_WIN Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s
1 1.15% 131 5.21E-04 9 7.11% 811 3.22E-03 17 7.38% 842 3.34E-03 2 0.42% 48 1.89E-04 10 4.39% 501 1.99E-03 18 8.17% 932 3.70E-03 3 0.41% 46 1.84E-04 11 4.66% 532 2.11E-03 19 5.70% 649 2.58E-03 4 0.26% 30 1.19E-04 12 5.89% 671 2.66E-03 20 4.27% 487 1.93E-03 5 0.50% 57 2.26E-04 13 6.15% 701 2.78E-03 21 3.26% 372 1.47E-03 6 0.90% 103 4.09E-04 14 6.04% 688 2.73E-03 22 3.30% 376 1.49E-03 7 3.79% 432 1.72E-03 15 7.01% 799 3.17E-03 23 2.46% 280 1.11E-03 8 7.76% 885 3.51E-03 16 7.14% 813 3.23E-03 24 1.86% 213 8.43E-04 Total 11,401
2023 Hourly Traffic Volumes Per Direction and TOG Evaporative Emissions - TEVAP_NB_WIN Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile
1 1.15% 131 5.22E-04 9 7.11% 811 3.22E-03 17 7.38% 842 3.35E-03 2 0.42% 48 1.89E-04 10 4.39% 501 1.99E-03 18 8.17% 932 3.70E-03 3 0.41% 46 1.85E-04 11 4.66% 532 2.11E-03 19 5.70% 649 2.58E-03 4 0.26% 30 1.19E-04 12 5.89% 671 2.67E-03 20 4.27% 487 1.94E-03 5 0.50% 57 2.27E-04 13 6.15% 701 2.79E-03 21 3.26% 372 1.48E-03 6 0.90% 103 4.10E-04 14 6.04% 688 2.74E-03 22 3.30% 376 1.49E-03 7 3.79% 432 1.72E-03 15 7.01% 799 3.18E-03 23 2.46% 280 1.11E-03 8 7.76% 885 3.52E-03 16 7.14% 813 3.23E-03 24 1.86% 213 8.45E-04 Total 11,401
Winchester Hotel- Offsite Residential
Cumulative Operation - S. Winchester Boulevard
Fugitive Road PM2.5 Modeling - Roadway Links, Traffic Volumes, and Fugitive Road PM2.5 Emissions Year = 2023
Road Link Description Direction
No.

Lanes
Link
Length
(m)
Link
Length
(mi)
Link
Width
(m)
Link
Width
(ft)
Release
Height
( m)
Average
Speed
(mph)
Average
Vehicles
per Day
FUG_SB_WIN
S. Winchester Boulevard
Southbound SB 3 671.2 0.42 17.0 56 1.3 40 11,401
FUG_NB_WIN
S. Winchester Boulevard
Northbound NB 2 672.4 0.42 13.3 44 1.3 40 11,401
Total 22,802
Emission Factors - Fugitive PM2.5
Speed Category 1 234
Travel Speed (mph) 40
Tire Wear - Emissions per Vehicle (g/VMT) 0.00219
Brake Wear - Emissions per Vehicle (g/VMT) 0.01735
Road Dust - Emissions per Vehicle (g/VMT) 0.01682
otal Fugitive PM2.5 - Emissions per Vehicle (g/VMT) 0.03636 Emisson Factors from CT-EMFAC2017
2023 Hourly Traffic Volumes and Fugitive PM2.5 Emissions - FUG_SB_WIN Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/s
1 1.15% 131 5.53E-04 9 7.11% 811 3.42E-03 17 7.38% 842 3.55E-03 2 0.42% 48 2.00E-04 10 4.39% 501 2.11E-03 18 8.17% 932 3.92E-03 3 0.41% 46 1.96E-04 11 4.66% 532 2.24E-03 19 5.70% 649 2.74E-03 4 0.26% 30 1.26E-04 12 5.89% 671 2.83E-03 20 4.27% 487 2.05E-03 5 0.50% 57 2.40E-04 13 6.15% 701 2.95E-03 21 3.26% 372 1.57E-03 6 0.90% 103 4.34E-04 14 6.04% 688 2.90E-03 22 3.30% 376 1.58E-03 7 3.79% 432 1.82E-03 15 7.01% 799 3.37E-03 23 2.46% 280 1.18E-03 8 7.76% 885 3.73E-03 16 7.14% 813 3.43E-03 24 1.86% 213 8.95E-04 Total 11,401
2023 Hourly Traffic Volumes Per Direction and Fugitive PM2.5 Emissions - FUG_NB_WIN Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile Hour
% Per
Hour VPH g/mile
1 1.15% 131 5.54E-04 9 7.11% 811 3.42E-03 17 7.38% 842 3.55E-03 2 0.42% 48 2.01E-04 10 4.39% 501 2.11E-03 18 8.17% 932 3.93E-03 3 0.41% 46 1.96E-04 11 4.66% 532 2.24E-03 19 5.70% 649 2.74E-03 4 0.26% 30 1.27E-04 12 5.89% 671 2.83E-03 20 4.27% 487 2.06E-03 5 0.50% 57 2.41E-04 13 6.15% 701 2.96E-03 21 3.26% 372 1.57E-03 6 0.90% 103 4.35E-04 14 6.04% 688 2.90E-03 22 3.30% 376 1.59E-03 7 3.79% 432 1.82E-03 15 7.01% 799 3.37E-03 23 2.46% 280 1.18E-03 8 7.76% 885 3.73E-03 16 7.14% 813 3.43E-03 24 1.86% 213 8.97E-04 Total 11,401
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA - Nearby Roadway Cumulative Traffic - TACs & PM2.5 AERMOD Risk Modeling Parameters and Maximum Concentrations at Construction MEI Receptor
Emission Year 2023
Receptor Information
Number of Receptors 1 at construction MEI location
Receptor Height 1.5 meters
Receptor Distances Construction MEI location
Meteorological Conditions
BAAQMD San Jose Airport Met Data 2013-2017
Land Use Classification Urban
Wind Speed Variable
Winf Direction Variable
S. Winchester Boulevard
Construction MEI - Maximum Concentrations
Meteorological
Data Years DPM Exhaust TOG Evaporative TOG Total PM2.5 Fugitive PM2.5 Vehicle PM2.5 2013-2017 0.00245 0.13237 0.16528 0.18281 0.17532 0.00749 2023 Concentration (μg/m3)*
Winchester Hotel, San Jose, CA
Maximum DPM Cancer Risk Calculations From - Traffic Emissions on S. Winchester Blvd Impacts at Construction MEI - 1.5 meter receptor height Cancer Risk Calculation Method
Cancer Risk (per million) =CPF x Inhalation Dose x ASF x ED/AT x FAH x 1.0E6 Where: CPF = Cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ASF = Age sensitivity factor for specified age group
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time for lifetime cancer risk (years)
FAH = Fraction of time spent at home (unitless)
Inhalation Dose = Cair x DBR x A x (EF/365) x 10-6
Where: Cair = concentration in air (μg/m3)
DBR = daily breathing rate (L/kg body weight-day)
A = Inhalation absorption factor
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
10-6 = Conversion factor
Cancer Potency Factors (mg/kg-day)-1
CPF

1.10E+00
Vehicle TOG Exhaust 6.28E-03
Vehicle TOG Evaporative 3.70E-04
Values
Infant/Child Adult
Age --> 3rd Trimester 0 - 2 2 - 16 16 - 30
Parameter
ASF = 10 10 3 1
DBR* = 361 1090 572 261
A = 1 1 1 1
EF = 350 350 350 350
AT = 70 70 70 70
FAH = 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73
* 95th percentile breathing rates for infants and 80th percentile for children and adults Construction Cancer Risk by Year - Maximum Impact Receptor Location Exposure
Exposure Duration DPM
Exhaust
TOG
Evaporative

TOG DPM
Year (years) Age
0 0.25 -0.25 - 0* 10 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.033 0.010 0.0008 0.04 Hazard
Index
Fugitive
PM2.5
Total
PM2.5
1 1 0 - 1 10 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.402 0.124 0.0091 0.54 0.0005 0.18 0.18 2 1 1 - 2 10 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.402 0.124 0.0091 0.54 3 1 2 - 3 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 4 1 3 - 4 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 5 1 4 - 5 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 6 1 5 - 6 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 7 1 6 - 7 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 8 1 7 - 8 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 9 1 8 - 9 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 10 1 9 - 10 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 11 1 10 - 11 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 12 1 11 - 12 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 13 1 12 - 13 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 14 1 13 - 14 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 15 1 14 - 15 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 16 1 15 - 16 3 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.063 0.020 0.0014 0.08 17 1 16-17 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 18 1 17-18 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 19 1 18-19 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 20 1 19-20 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 21 1 20-21 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 22 1 21-22 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 23 1 22-23 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 24 1 23-24 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 25 1 24-25 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 26 1 25-26 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 27 1 26-27 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 28 1 27-28 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 29 1 28-29 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 30 1 29-30 1 0.0025 0.1324 0.1653 0.007 0.002 0.0002 0.01 Total Increased Cancer Risk 1.82 0.562 0.041 2.4
* Third trimester of pregnancy
2051
2052
Maximum
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2032
2023
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
TAC
DPM
Maximum - Exposure Information Concentration (ug/m3) Cancer Risk (per million) TOTAL
Year
Age
Sensitivity
Factor
Exhaust
TOG
Evaporative
TOG
Date of Request 8/20/2020
Contact Name Casey DivineAffiliation Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc.

Phone 707‐794‐0400 x103Email
[email protected]
Project Name Winchster HotelAddress
1212 & 1224 S WinchesterBlvd
City San JoseCounty Santa Clara
Type (residential,
commercial, mixed
use, industrial,etc.) HotelProject Size (# ofunits or buildingsquare feet) 119 rooms Table A: Requester Contact Information
Comments:

Risk & Hazard Stationary Source Inquiry FormThis form is required when users request stationary source data from BAAQMDThis form is to be used with the BAAQMD's Google Earth stationary source screening tables.

Click here for guidance on coducting risk & hazard screening, including roadways & freeways, refer to the District's Risk & Hazard Analysis flow chart.

Click here for District'sRecommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards document.

Table A: Requester Contact Information
For Air District assistance, the following steps must be completed:

1. Complete all the contact and project information requestedin . Incomplete forms will not be processed. Please include a project site map.

2. Download and installthe free program Google Earth, http://www.google.com/earth/download/ge/, and then download the county specificGoogle Earth stationary source application files  from the District's website, http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Planning‐and‐Research/CEQA‐GUIDELINES/Tools‐and‐Methodology.aspx. The small points on the map represent stationary sources permitted by the District (Map A on right). These permitted sourcesinclude diesel back‐up generators, gas stations, dry cleaners, boilers, printers, auto spray booths, etc. Click on a point to view the source'sInformation Table, including the name, location, and preliminary estimated cancer risk, hazard index, and PM2.5 concentration.

3. Find the project site in Google Earth by inputting the site's addressin the Google Earth search box.

4. Identify stationary sources within at least a 1000ft radius of projectsite. Verify that the location of the source on the map matches with the source's addressin the Information Table, by using the Google Earth addresssearch box to confirm the source's addresslocation. Please report any mapping errors to the District.

5. List the stationary source information in blue section only.6. Note that a small percentage of the stationary sources have Health Risk Screening Assessment(HRSA) data INSTEAD ofscreening level data. These sources will be noted by an asterisk nextto the Plant Name (Map B on right). If HRSA values are presented,these values have already been modeled and cannot be adjusted further.

7. Email this completed form to District staff. District staff will provide the most recentrisk, hazard, and PM2.5 data that are available for the source(s). If thisinformation or data are not available, source emissions data will be provided. Staff will respond to inquiries within three weeks.

Note that a public records request received for the same stationary source information will cancel the processing of your SSIF request.

Submit forms, maps, and questions to Areana Flores at 415‐749‐4616, or [email protected] Table B
Table A
Construction MEI
Distance from
Receptor (feet) or
MEI1 FACID (Plant No.) Facility Name Address Cancer Risk2 Hazard Risk2 PM2.52 Source No.3 Type of Source4 Fuel Code5 Status/Comments Distance
Adjustment
Multiplier
Adjusted
Cancer Risk
Estimate
Adjusted
Hazard
Risk
Adjusted
PM2.5
615 104308 Chevron #6027 1301 S Winchester Blvd

9.95 0.04 ‐‐
Gas Dispensing
Facility 2018 Dataset 0.03 0.3 0.001 #VALUE!
Footnotes:

1. Maximally exposed individual
c. BAAQMD Reg 11 Rule 16 required that all co‐residential (sharing a wall, floor, ceiling or is in the same building as a residential unit) dry cleaners cease use of perc on July 1, 2010.

Date last updated: 03/13/2018

2. These Cancer Risk, Hazard Index, and PM2.5 columns represent the values in the Google Earth Plant Information Table.

3. Each plant may have multiple permits and sources.
f. Unless otherwise noted, exempt sources are considered insignificant. See BAAQMD Reg 2 Rule 1 for a list of exempt sources. g. This spray booth is considered to be insignificant.

4. Permitted sources include diesel back‐up generators, gas stations, dry cleaners, boilers, printers, auto spray booths, etc.

11. Further information about common sources:
a. Sources that only include diesel internal combustion engines can be adjusted using the BAAQMD's Diesel Multiplier worksheet. b. The risk from natural gas boilers used for space heating when <25 MM BTU/hr would have an estimated cancer risk of one in a million or less, and a chronic hazard index of 0.003 or less. To Therefore, there is no cancer risk, hazard or PM2.5 concentrations from co‐residential dry cleaning businesses in the BAAQMD. d. Non co‐residential dry cleaners must phase out use of perc by Jan. 1, 2023. Therefore, the risk from these dry cleaners does not need to be factored in over a 70‐year period, but instead should reflect e. Gas stations can be adjusted using BAAQMD's Gas Station Distance Mulitplier worksheet.

6. If a Health Risk Screening Assessment (HRSA) was completed for the source, the application number will be listed here.

7. The date that the HRSA was completed.

8. Engineer who completed the HRSA. For District purposes only.

9. All HRSA completed before 1/5/2010 need to be multiplied by an age sensitivity factor of 1.7.

10. The HRSA "Chronic Health" number represents the Hazard Index.

5. Fuel codes: 98 = diesel, 189 = Natural Gas.

Table B: Google Earth data








 





 

 !"#

$#%&!'!"
(
#)" *
+,-.-/,01/23 *4++/5 2 6
7 89 :




 




 !!"#$ % & ! '# ()()

 !!"#$ % & ! '# * +,-

 ..//012
34567
89#:;<4##= 9%6'!
#>&7" 9#?8'5)
* @0A1
BC
D
.EFGHIJ1A KL 9! #5&
KMKLM3M N '#O 'P9' 9Q $ % & !

(8!R#S6#'!  !"#
'T# 9"#6 U
"# P %!'#V
8#!6'#'8
%'#W8&"#X#YP%!"#!8#X#'X'! 9! &&
#&8W
#W69#' !#'P% V %#Z &!6#[ 'T#%
9 9Q#)''''9!'#
#%89"%!"M# S6#'%
9 9Q#&7&# P# '#98!#
%89""#V8
#7 & ! 9Q#'9' ! 7#& 9"#''#'%6# '#'%688&'\#'9 8
#%9!
'\#"
#%
'\# 9"#6 &!6#V % & ! 'M# ]#58P

Q6!##>
#)
#)
#^ & !
#_ 9 Q9!#O '!
%!

APPENDIX D

EMFAC RESULTS

1212-1224 South Winchester Boulevard
Existing Fuel Demand
Area Sub-Area Cal. Year Season Veh_Tech EMFAC2007 Category VMT Fuel_GAS Fuel_DSL Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual All Vehicles All Vehicles 525.2 0.0188 0.0033 0.0220 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual ALL OTHER BUSES - DSL OBUS - DSL 0.4881 0.0001 Fuel demand (in gallons per year) = 1000 x 365 x 0.0220 = 8,044.61 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual LDA - DSL LDA - DSL 2.74 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual LDA - GAS LDA - GAS 304.8 0.0097 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual LDT1 - DSL LDT1 - DSL 0.0091 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual LDT1 - GAS LDT1 - GAS 27.3 0.0010 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual LDT2 - DSL LDT2 - DSL 0.6273 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual LDT2 - GAS LDT2 - GAS 95.7 0.0040 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual LHD1 - DSL LHDT1 - DSL 4.51 0.0002 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual LHD1 - GAS LHDT1 - GAS 6.60 0.0008 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual LHD2 - DSL LHDT2 - DSL 1.77 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual LHD2 - GAS LHDT2 - GAS 0.8739 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual MCY - GAS MCY - GAS 2.72 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual MDV - DSL MDV - DSL 1.37 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual MDV - GAS MDV - GAS 55.5 0.0028 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual MH - DSL MH - DSL 0.1062 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual MH - GAS MH - GAS 0.3029 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual MOTOR COACH - DSL OBUS - DSL 0.1407 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual OBUS - GAS OBUS - GAS 0.2890 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual PTO - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.1676 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual SBUS - DSL SBUS - DSL 0.3658 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual SBUS - GAS SBUS - GAS 0.1207 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 AG - DSL MHDT - DSL 0.0002 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 CAIRP HEAVY - DSL MHDT - DSL 0.0807 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 CAIRP SMALL - DSL MHDT - DSL 0.0109 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 INSTATE CONSTRUCTION HEAVY - DSL MHDT - DSL 0.1559 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 INSTATE CONSTRUCTION SMALL - DSL MHDT - DSL 0.3556 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 INSTATE HEAVY - DSL MHDT - DSL 1.88 0.0002 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 INSTATE SMALL - DSL MHDT - DSL 3.44 0.0004 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 OOS HEAVY - DSL MHDT - DSL 0.0458 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 OOS SMALL - DSL MHDT - DSL 0.0062 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 PUBLIC - DSL MHDT - DSL 0.1545 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6 UTILITY - DSL MHDT - DSL 0.0263 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T6TS - GAS MHDT - GAS 0.7901 0.0002 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 AG - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.0000 0 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 CAIRP - DSL HHDT - DSL 1.80 0.0003 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 CAIRP CONSTRUCTION - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.1120 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 NNOOS - DSL HHDT - DSL 2.19 0.0003 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 NOOS - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.7064 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 OTHER PORT - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.1858 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 POAK - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.9994 0.0002 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 POLA - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.0000 0 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 PUBLIC - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.1389 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 SINGLE - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.8441 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 SINGLE CONSTRUCTION - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.2778 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 SWCV - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.3190 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 TRACTOR - DSL HHDT - DSL 3.19 0.0005 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 TRACTOR CONSTRUCTION - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.2291 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7 UTILITY - DSL HHDT - DSL 0.0145 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual T7IS - GAS HHDT - GAS 0.0053 0.0000 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual UBUS - DSL UBUS - DSL 0.6719 0.0001 Sub-Areas Santa Clara (SF) 2020 Annual UBUS - GAS UBUS - GAS 0.0121 0.0000 Fuel demand (in thousands of gallons per day) =