Cities Index.
Letters from the Public

San Jose City Council
October 25, 2022

Document
Letters from the Public
Meeting
October 25, 2022
Body
San Jose City Council
Original file
319 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

360 Grand Ave #323, Oakland 94610
[email protected]
October 24, 2022

City of San Jose
200 East Santa Clara Street
San Jose, CA 95113

Re: Proposed 1065 South Winchester Boulevard Housing Development.

Dear City Council and City Attorney:

The California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund (CaRLA) submits this letter to inform the San Jose City Council that they have an obligation to abide by all relevant state housing laws when evaluating the proposed 1065 South Winchester Boulevard mixed-use housing development. The Housing Accountability Act (GOV 65589.5) requires approval of zoning and general plan compliant projects unless findings can be made regarding specific, objective, written health and safety hazards.

As you are well aware, California remains in the throes of a statewide crisis-level housing shortage. New housing such as this is a public benefit; it will bring increased tax revenue, new customers to local businesses, decarbonization in the face of climate crisis, but most importantly it will reduce displacement of existing residents into homelessness or carbon-heavy car commutes.

CaRLA is a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation whose mission includes advocating for increased access to housing for Californians at all income levels, including low-income households. Consistent with the general plan, the proposed mixed-use development will provide badly needed housing within the Winchester Boulevard Urban Village and increase employment opportunities through the provision of on-site commercial office space. In addition, the proposed development will include various multi-modal and public improvements, encouraging the use of alternative transit options, such as the bus stop and bicycle lanes located adjacent to the building on Winchester Boulevard.

While no one project will solve the regional housing crisis, the proposed 1065 South Winchester Boulevard development is the kind of housing San Jose needs to mitigate displacement, provide shelter for its growing population, and arrest unsustainable housing price appreciation. You may learn more about CaRLA at www.carlaef.org.

Sincerely,

2 of 2

Dylan Casey
CaRLA Executive Director

Courtney Welch
CaRLA Director of Planning and Investigation

[External Email]
FW: Proposed 1065 S. Winchester Blvd Development
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 10/25/2022 7:50 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>

From: Esparza, Maya <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 5:19 PM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Proposed 1065 S. Winchester Blvd Development

FYI- we all got this email

Get Outlook for iOS
From: Kit Reed >
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 4:44:57 PM
To: Jones, Chappie <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Davis, Dev <[email protected]>; Carrasco, Magdalena <[email protected]>; Mahan, Ma <Ma[email protected]>; Esparza, Maya <[email protected]>; Foley, Pam <[email protected]>; Peralez, Raul <[email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Arenas, Sylvia <[email protected]> Subject: Proposed 1065 S. Winchester Blvd Development

Some people who received this message don't often get email from . Learn why this is important

Hi there,

I live on Verdant Way which dead ends on Acorn Ct behind the proposed Winchester development.

I understand the Planning Commission has recommended you approve this but I agree completely with Commissioner Ornelas-Wise, the Preservaon Acon Council and Historic Landmarks Commission; these buildings should not be destroyed. The three exisng buildings, farmhouse, barn and drying shed should be preserved as a rare remaining piece of what this valley used to be. San Jose has a terrible reputaon for tearing down historical buildings; here is a chance to do the right thing.

I grew up in the Santa Clara Valley when we sll had orchards and farms. For Adam Askari, who did not grow up here, to declare these buildings are not historical because not designed by a famous architect or associated with an historical person is so wrong and uninformed.

These buildings could become a great learning space for the many newcomers to Santa Clara Valley. My hope is you will move these buildings and give them a new life sharing the history of our remarkable valley.

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Thank you.

Kit Reed

← All documents from this meeting