Cities Index.
Letters from the Public

San Jose City Council
November 8, 2022

Document
Letters from the Public
Meeting
November 8, 2022
Body
San Jose City Council
Original file
92 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

[External Email]
[External Email]
Comment - City Council Meeting November 8, Agenda 3.4, File # 22-1621 wayneok
Mon 11/7/2022 10:35 AM
To:City Clerk <[email protected]>

You don't often get email from Learn why this is important

Agenda 3.4, File # 22-1621
Subject: Issuance of Tax-Exempt Mulfamily Revenue Bonds to Finance the 2350 S. Bascom Affordable Housing Development

I would like to submit a comment on this item concerning approving bonds for the Bascom Avenue project to be brought up at the council meeng.

The memorandum states: On October 18, 2022, the City Council adopted a resoluon authorizing the issuance of bonds by CMFA as the alternate issuer for the Development under Secon I.C of the Policy for special circumstances. At that me, the Development had all sources in place, was no longer seeking City loan financing and applied for a $48,000,000 bond allocaon from the California Debt Limit Allocaon Commiee (CDLAC) on March 16, 2022. On June 15, 2022, the 2350 S. Bascom development was awarded $34,409,000 of the 2021 State Ceiling on Qualified Private Acvity Bonds for use by the applicant to issue bonds by December 12, 2022.

Now the developer is asking for $65,000,000 which is
$17 Million dollars more (35% more) than originally applied ($48MM) $30 Million more (88% more) than originally awarded ($34,4MM)

If the project is no longer financially feasible at the original projecon, there are opons maybe the project should not proceed
build it somewhere else where the cost could be less
change the scope, size, scale of the development
get private investors
….and I am sure there are other…

The developer purchased the land with a risk/reward scenario in mind and “ had all the financial sources in place”.

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Somemes things work out and somemes they don’t.

Why is it up to taxpayers to be on the hook to ensure the developer makes a profit?

Thank you
Wayne Firsty

← All documents from this meeting