Public Safety, Finance, and Strategic Support Committee November 17, 2022
Item (d)2
Police Department
Reform and Operational
Improvement Recommendations
Report
Presenters:
Lieutenant Steve Donohue, Police Department
Peter Hamilton, Assistant to the City Manager, Office of the City Manager Today’s Topics
How is a policy implemented or changed?
What is the status of the recommendations?
How are statuses determined?
Where do we go from here?
Questions
2 Potential Considerations when Implementing a
Recommendation
Recommendation
Interconnectivity
Staffing
Limitations
Budget
Constraints
Workload
Capacity
Meet-and-Confer
Process
Cross-Agency
Collaboration
Outside Entity
Responsiblity
3 Recommendations by Source
City Auditor, 45, 8%
CNA 21st CP, 124, 23%
CNA U of F, 48, 9%
Internal AAR, 41, 8%
IPA, 106, 20%
OIR AAR, 32, 6%
RIPS, 73, 14%
RIPS YCR, 43, 8%
State Audit, 14, 3%
UTEP, 5, 1%
4 Recommendations by Priority
1 = Currently in Progress, 104, 20%
2 = Agree, but Not Started, 120,
23%
3 = Disagree, 55, 10%
C = Completed, 226, 42%
M = Maintain, 26, 5%
R = Needing Review, 0, 0%
5 Recommendations by Grouping and Priority Currently in Progress Agree, but not Started Disagree Completed Maintain Needing Review
Total
%
Alternative Approach 4 6 2 2 2 0 16 3%
Community Engagement 35 9 1 5 1 0 51 10%
Department Member Wellness 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1%
External Analysis or Review 0 14 0 2 0 0 16 3%
Facilities Improvement 0 2 1 3 0 0 6 1%
Internal Analysis or Review 1 4 0 8 2 0 15 3%
Legislative Advocacy 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 1%
New or Additional Equipment 0 6 1 0 0 0 7 1%
Oversight 2 0 5 0 0 0 7 1%
Policy Change 47 33 36 152 13 0 281 53%
Recruiting & Hiring 0 5 1 10 1 0 17 3%
Staffing 1 3 1 2 1 0 8 2%
Technology Improvement 0 4 1 9 1 0 15 3%
Training 6 24 0 17 3 0 50 9%
Transparency 8 10 5 10 2 0 35 7%
Total 104 120 55 226 26 0 531
6 Process of a Policy Implementation or Change
Need for Policy Change
Received & Analyzed for
Direction and Feasibility
(Staffing & Budget)
Research of Best Practices
(Studies, Reports, White
Papers)
Research of Other
Agencies
(10 Nationwide and 5 in
California)
Internal Stakeholder Input
(Subject Matter Expert &
Affected Unit) Draft Policy
#1
External Stakeholder Input
(Fiscal Unit, Budget Office,
City Manager’s Office,
Other City Departments)
Legal Analysis #1
(City Attorney’s Office)
Draft Policy
#2
Meet-and-Confer Review
(Police Officers’ Association
& Office of Employee
Relations)
Command Staff Review
* Community Review
Draft Policy
#3
Legal Analysis #2 Executive Staff Review
Final Policy
Posting to Public
Documents Library
7 Timeline of a Policy Implementation or Change
Need for Policy Change
Received & Analyzed for
Direction and Feasibility
(Staffing & Budget)
Research of Best Practices
(Studies, Reports, White
Papers)
Research of Other
Agencies
(10 Nationwide and 5 in
California)
Internal Stakeholder Input
(Subject Matter Expert &
Affected Units) Draft Policy
#1
External Stakeholder Input
(Fiscal Unit, Budget Office,
City Manager’s Office,
Other City Departments)
Legal Analysis #1
(City Attorney’s Office)
Draft Policy
#2
Meet-and-Confer Review
(Police Officers’ Association
& Office of Employee
Relations)
Command Staff Review
* Community Review
Draft Policy
#3
Legal Analysis #2 Executive Staff Review
Final Policy
Posting to Public
Documents Library
3-5 Days 2-3 Weeks Simultaneously
1-3 Weeks 3-5 Days 3 Weeks Simultaneously…
3-5 Days 1-3 Days
1 Day
…
Total: ~8-12 weeks
8