The Public Record — Joint Meeting for the Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole, January 11, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

RULES COMMITTEE: 1/11/2023
Item: B.1
File ID: ROGC 23-006
TO: Honorable Mayor & FROM: Toni J. Taber, CMC
City Council City Clerk
SUBJECT: The Public Record DATE: January 11, 2023
December 1, 2022 – January 5, 2023

ITEMS FILED FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD
Letters from Boards, Commissions, and Committees
Letters from the Public

1. Letter from Verizon Wireless, dated December 2, 2022, regarding: CPUC - Verizon Wireless - City of San Jose-CA_SJ_SANJOSE_SOUTH_151 - A-573609.

2. Letter from Verizon Wireless, dated December 12, 2022, regarding: CPUC - Verizon Wireless - City of San Jose-CA_SJ_SANJOSE_DT_871 - A-574721.

3. Letter from Chris Loo, dated December 5, 2022, regarding: Adopt the strongest possible EV reach code for multi-family housing
4 - 92. Letter from 89 members of the public, dated December 6 - 26, 2022, regarding: Council Policy 5-1.

93. Letter from Yardenna Aaron (Maintenance Cooperation Trust Fund (MCTF)), dated December 13, 2022, regarding: SJ Policy No.0-44 Response Letter.

94. Letter from Derrick Seaver (San Jose Chamber of Commerce), dated December 13, 2022, regarding: Support Letter - Energy Hub (Item 10.2).

95. Letter from District 10/David Low, dated December 20, 2022, regarding: Re: Letter from Destination: Home re Affordable Housing Siting Policy (Item 8.2 on 12.6 agenda(.

96. Letter from Mark Baker, dated December 21, 2022, regarding: Digital Billboards and Suicide.

Rules and Open Government Committee
January 11, 2023
Subject: Public Record

Page 2 ends

97. Letter from Joanna Saucedo (Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors), dated December 23, 2022, regarding: Measure A (2016) - Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee.
____________________________
Toni J. Taber, CMC
City Clerk
TJT/tt
12/13/22, 2:01 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: CPUC - Verizon Wireless - City of San Jose-CA_SJ_SANJOSE_SOUTH_151 - A-573609 City Clerk <[email protected]>
Fri 12/2/2022 7:39 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> 1 attachments (10 KB)
CPUC_2441.pdf;
From: CPUC Team < >
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2022 6:00 AM
To:

Cc: ; Koki, Elizabeth <[email protected]>; Webmaster Manager <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: CPUC - Verizon Wireless - City of San Jose-CA_SJ_SANJOSE_SOUTH_151 - A-573609 This is to provide your agency with notice according to the provisions of General Order No. 159A of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California (CPUC) see attachment.

This notice is being provided pursuant to Section IV.C.2.

Public Record: 1
Dec 02, 2022
Consumer Protection and Enforcement Division
California Public Utilities Commission
RE: Notification Letter for CA_SJ_SANJOSE_SOUTH_151 - A San Jose, CA /GTE Mobilnet California LP
This is to provide the Commission with notice according to the provisions of General Order No. 159A of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California ( "CPUC") for the project described in Attachment A.

A copy of this notification letter is also being provided to the appropriate local government agency for its information. Should there be any questions regarding this project, or if you disagree with any of the information contained herein, please contact the representative below.

Verizon Wireless
Ann Goldstein
Coordinator RE & Compliance - West Territory

FW: CPUC - Verizon Wireless - City of San Jose-CA_SJ_SANJOSE_DT_871 - A-574721 City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 8:13 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: CPUC Team
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 6:17 AM
To:

Cc: ; Koki, Elizabeth <[email protected]>; Webmaster Manager <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: CPUC - Verizon Wireless - City of San Jose-CA_SJ_SANJOSE_DT_871 - A-574721 This is to provide your agency with notice according to the provisions of General Order No. 159A of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California (CPUC) see attachment.

This notice is being provided pursuant to Section IV.C.2.

Public Record: 2
Dec 12, 2022
Consumer Protection and Enforcement Division
California Public Utilities Commission
RE: Notification Letter for CA_SJ_SANJOSE_DT_871 - A
San Jose, CA /GTE Mobilnet California LP
This is to provide the Commission with notice according to the provisions of General Order No. 159A of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California ( "CPUC") for the project described in Attachment A.

Verizon Wireless
Ann Goldstein
Coordinator RE & Compliance - West Territory

JURISDICTION PLANNING MANAGER CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL BOARD COUNTY City of San Jose [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Santa Clara VZW Legal Entity Site Name Site Address Tower Design Size of Building or NA GTE Mobilnet California LP CA_SJ_SANJOSE_DT_871 - A 234 SOUTH 12th STREET, San Jose , CA95112 Public Lighting Structure (free standing) N/A Site Latitude Site Longitude PS Location Code Tower Appearance Tower Height (in feet) Type of Approval Approval Issue Date 37°20'16.462''N 121°52'34.079''WNAD(83) 574721 Antenna Rad: 25' 6 30' Permitting 12/02/2022 Project Description: Installation (1) new light pole; (3) Antenna/Radio; (2) Pull Boxes; (4) Collar nuts; (4) Fdn Anchor bolts, FCC signage; Disconnect switch; Smart Meter 12/13/22, 2:03 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Adopt the strongest possible EV reach code for multi-family housing Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Tue 12/6/2022 9:45 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: Chris Loo < >
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2022 7:07 PM
To: The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]> Subject: Adopt the strongest possible EV reach code for multi-family housing Mayor Sam Liccardo,
As a Bay Area resident, I’m pleased that you and your colleagues are considering expanding San Jose’s EV charging reach code to provide EV Ready charging for all newly built multi-family units. This is vital to lower structural barriers to EV adoption for the significant proportion of city residents living in apartments and condos, who expect and deserve the same access to low-cost, at-home EV charging that single-family residents enjoy.

San José’s current reach code ensures EV Ready charging for 30% of new multi-family housing parking spaces and EV Capable pre-work for the other 70% of spaces (with raceways pre-installed and panel space with sufficient incoming power in order to later wire the space for EV charging).

While this was an ambitious code when adopted three years ago, it has proven virtually impossible for residents to convert theoretically EV Capable spaces into spaces that are actually capable of charging an EV. To do so, residents must:
(1) obtain approval from their apartment manager or HOA, (2) secure a permit,
(3) hire an electrician to add wiring, breaker, and a receptacle or charging station, and (4) pay for the cost of the equipment and labor (as much as $9000).

These hurdles are very challenging for residents to overcome, meaning that EV Capable in theory is usually EV Incapable in practice.

So we appreciate that you commissioned a marginal cost analysis to help determine the feasibility of replacing EV Capable with EV Ready requirements. The analysis shows that doing so will not be a burden on builders and will expand ready-to-charge access from 30% to 100%.

Therefore, we urge you to adopt a new EV charging reach code that centers equity, minimizes costs for builders, and ensures equitable access to EV charging for all residents of newly built apartments and condos. Specifically, we recommend that the new reach code require:

Public Record: 3
12/13/22, 2:03 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. • Receptacles with Low-Power Level 2 (240 volt, 20 amp) charging for 85% of units with parking, and
• EV charging stations (EVSE) for the remaining 15% of units with parking (unless the state will allow you to substitute some of the EVSE with full-power Level 2 EV Ready receptacles).

We also recommend requiring that:
• The wiring go directly to each household’s meter so that residents can access SJCE’s or PG&E’s TOU rates without having to pay third-party fees, and • Each receptacle be prominently labeled “EV Charging Ready” so that residents understand they can charge an EV at that parking spot.

As the nation’s tenth largest city and Capital of Silicon Valley, San José has the chance to set the bar for other cities and states. Please ensure EV charging for all! Thank you for your consideration and leadership.

Chris Loo
12/14/22, 12:21 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: ANA M GAMBELIN 95127 - 12/6/22 Item 8.4 Transportation Policy 5-1, Reject the Alternative Recommendation
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 2:47 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 9:34 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: ANA M GAMBELIN 95127 - 12/6/22 Item 8.4 Transportation Policy 5-1, Reject the Alternative Recommendation
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Dear City Council,
I join ~1,000 community members in asking you to reject the "Alternative Recommendation", that is opposed by staff and was rejected by the Planning Commission, for the update to Council Policy 5-1. It would allow a developer to convert the former Pleasant Hills Golf Course site with no clear process or plan for meaningful engagement by the community in visioning the future uses of the land. One developer’s interest in one potential redevelopment project should not drive the direction of Citywide policy.

Do not implement a policy change to accommodate a single property and the corresponding developers.

If you decide to allow development of a 114 acre property, do so via a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size.

1. A policy change should not be driven by a single property, in this case the Pleasant Hills Golf Course.

2. The policy change could have implications for other areas. It could be used as a model that could be applied down the road to other types of zoning.

3. Any future plans for this site must include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Public Record: 4
12/14/22, 12:21 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

4. If the city would like to explore what should happen with this 114 acre site, it should be through a cityled community based process instead of developing a policy to lay that out. The city and community should drive that process, not a developer.

The city is already doing visioning for other locations, including a 15-acre site, throughout other council districts and our community demands the same due process, community engagement, and requirements that are already in place to ensure our neighborhood growth and development align with the city's general plan and the community open space initiatives.

ANA M GAMBELIN
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 12:21 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Susan Orth 95126 - 12/6/22 Item 8.4 Transportation Policy 5-1, Reject the Alternative Recommendation
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 2:46 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 2:05 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Susan Orth 95126 - 12/6/22 Item 8.4 Transportation Policy 5-1, Reject the Alternative Recommendation Dear City Council,
I join ~1,000 community members in asking you to reject the "Alternative Recommendation", that is opposed by staff and was rejected by the Planning Commission, for the update to Council Policy 5-1. It would allow a developer to convert the former Pleasant Hills Golf Course site with no clear process or plan for meaningful engagement by the community in visioning the future uses of the land. One developer’s interest in one potential redevelopment project should not drive the direction of Citywide policy.

Please do not a developer take away any more potential open space in SJ.

Do not implement a policy change to accommodate a single property and the corresponding developers.

If you decide to allow development of a 114 acre property, do so via a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size.

1. A policy change should not be driven by a single property, in this case the Pleasant Hills Golf Course.

2. The policy change could have implications for other areas. It could be used as a model that could be applied down the road to other types of zoning.

3. Any future plans for this site must include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

4. If the city would like to explore what should happen with this 114 acre site, it should be through a cityPublic Record: 5 12/14/22, 12:21 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. led community based process instead of developing a policy to lay that out. The city and community should drive that process, not a developer.

Susan Orth
95126
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 12:22 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Ralph Portillo 95148 - 12/6/22 Item 8.4 Transportation Policy 5-1, Reject the Alternative Recommendation
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 2:44 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 7:42 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Ralph Portillo 95148 - 12/6/22 Item 8.4 Transportation Policy 5-1, Reject the Alternative Recommendation
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Dear City Council,
I join ~1,000 community members in asking you to reject the "Alternative Recommendation", that is opposed by staff and was rejected by the Planning Commission, for the update to Council Policy 5-1. It would allow a developer to convert the former Pleasant Hills Golf Course site with no clear process or plan for meaningful engagement by the community in visioning the future uses of the land. One developer’s interest in one potential redevelopment project should not drive the direction of Citywide policy.

Live next to Pleasant Hills Golf Course. I do not think it’s appropriate for developers to decide what happens to the.open space that was designated to be a city recreational area.

Do not implement a policy change to accommodate a single property and the corresponding developers.

If you decide to allow development of a 114 acre property, do so via a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size.

1. A policy change should not be driven by a single property, in this case the Pleasant Hills Golf Course.

2. The policy change could have implications for other areas. It could be used as a model that could be applied down the road to other types of zoning.

Public Record: 6
12/14/22, 12:22 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

3. Any future plans for this site must include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Ralph Portillo
95148
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 8:37 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 Fw: 12/6/22 Agenda Item 8.4 Council Policy 5-1: Reject the Alternative Recommendation City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 2:43 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: < > on behalf of Tamara
Sanchez < >
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 9:50 PM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: 12/6/22 Agenda Item 8.4 Council Policy 5-1: Reject the Alternative Recommendation [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
[External Email]
Dear City Clerk City Clerk,
I ask that you join hundreds of community members and the Planning Commission by following the Planning Department staff recommendation for updating Transportation Analysis Policy 5-1 while rejecting the Alternative Recommendation that would facilitate development on Private Recreation and Open Space land. Send a clear message that one developer’s interest in one potential redevelopment project should not drive the direction of Citywide policy.

I object to the proposed Alternative Recommendation because it is inconsistent with the city’s General Plan and would facilitate development of huge parcels of open space without a community visioning process, such as is currently being provided for multiple other large parcels in San Jose.

The most immediate and obvious beneficiary of this harmful policy would be the owners of the 114 acre former Pleasant Hills Golf Course site, which presents an unparalleled opportunity to gain publicly accessible open space for local communities as part of a community-centered visioning process for future development of the site. If the Council would like to consider allowing this site to redevelop, the city should lead a transparent community engagement process to determine how the development of Public Record: 7
12/14/22, 8:37 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 the site could meet the needs of its future residents, the larger community, and the city.

Sincerely,
Tamara Sanchez
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
12/14/22, 12:23 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Haroon khan 95148 - 12/6/22 Item 8.4 Transportation Policy 5-1, Reject the Alternative Recommendation
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 2:52 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 5:52 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Haroon khan 95148 - 12/6/22 Item 8.4 Transportation Policy 5-1, Reject the Alternative Recommendation Dear City Council,
I join ~1,000 community members in asking you to reject the "Alternative Recommendation", that is opposed by staff and was rejected by the Planning Commission, for the update to Council Policy 5-1. It would allow a developer to convert the former Pleasant Hills Golf Course site with no clear process or plan for meaningful engagement by the community in visioning the future uses of the land. One developer’s interest in one potential redevelopment project should not drive the direction of Citywide policy.

We must have input on developing this piece of land
Do not implement a policy change to accommodate a single property and the corresponding developers.

If you decide to allow development of a 114 acre property, do so via a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size.

1. A policy change should not be driven by a single property, in this case the Pleasant Hills Golf Course.

2. The policy change could have implications for other areas. It could be used as a model that could be applied down the road to other types of zoning.

3. Any future plans for this site must include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

4. If the city would like to explore what should happen with this 114 acre site, it should be through a cityPublic Record: 8 12/14/22, 12:23 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. led community based process instead of developing a policy to lay that out. The city and community should drive that process, not a developer.

Haroon khan
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 12:27 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Tony Silva 95127 - Transportation Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:14 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 8:56 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Tony Silva 95127 - Transportation Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer. Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Tony Silva
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 9
12/14/22, 12:28 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Brian Smith 95129 - Transportation Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:12 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 8:58 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Brian Smith 95129 - Transportation Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Brian Smith
95129
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 10
12/14/22, 12:28 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Vina Valencia 95127 - Transportation Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:12 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:00 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Vina Valencia 95127 - Transportation Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Vina Valencia
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 11
12/14/22, 12:29 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Victoria Jump 95112 - Transportation Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:10 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:02 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Victoria Jump 95112 - Transportation Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Victoria Jump
95112
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 12
12/14/22, 12:30 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Sunil Sharma 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:13 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:08 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Sunil Sharma 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Sunil Sharma
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 13
12/14/22, 12:30 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Russ Van Dyne 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:14 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:08 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Russ Van Dyne 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Please listen to the community not just developers. A developer should not dictate how things are run in our community,. Allowing them to take the lead only on a project only provides lip service to the community. We live here and must be heard by our leaders not be left to the whim of a developer.

Russ Van Dyne
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 14
12/14/22, 12:31 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Sandra Sundberg 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:12 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:09 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Sandra Sundberg 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Sandra Sundberg
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 15
12/14/22, 12:31 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Rachel Martinez 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:11 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:16 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Rachel Martinez 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Rachel Martinez
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 16
12/14/22, 12:32 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: ANGELITO F GONZAGA 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:15 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:25 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: ANGELITO F GONZAGA 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

We need to Use the city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer. Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space. Suggest that the City that the developers update the GOLF Course thereby keeping the open space .

Public Record: 17
12/14/22, 12:32 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 12:33 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Sue Cancilla-conde 95129 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:14 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:34 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Sue Cancilla-conde 95129 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

I am a disabled senior. There are very few outdoor areas where I can go to view birds in their habitat.

City led planning might leave some green areas in the landscape.. A developer will not consider the needs of the people and the land. Please keep the City involved in the planning.

Sue Cancilla-conde
95129
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United Public Record: 18
12/14/22, 12:33 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 12:34 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: S Randle 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:12 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:34 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: S Randle 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

S Randle
95135
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 19
12/14/22, 12:35 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Emily Buell 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:14 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:48 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Emily Buell 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

As a Decedent of an evergreen pioneer , I am appalled by the actions of some board members , does this city mean anything to you at all?
Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer. Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Emily Buell
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 20
12/14/22, 12:35 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Daniel Martinez 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:10 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:48 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Daniel Martinez 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Daniel Martinez
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 21
12/14/22, 12:37 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Charles Ward 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:13 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 9:59 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Charles Ward 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

I have been a resident for thirty years and if you are going to develop this land then allow input from the community to decide what is in the best interest of the community not a developer. Tully road is already a problem with speeding and the older streets require going up Tully road to make a u turn to go down Tully. It is a real problem where vista verde street is, because people do not yield to people making the u-turn on Tully road . Added traffic could be a disaster. I would recommend opening up the median to allow cars from coconut to make a left on Tully. Or if the land is developed with houses then either no access to Tully road from the golf course side or limited access. I really wish it would stay an open space for future generations.

Charles Ward
95148
Public Record: 22
12/14/22, 12:37 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 12:37 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Ramesh Gunna 95129 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:12 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:06 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Ramesh Gunna 95129 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

To : the San Jose city council members.

We need you to represent the citizens & not the developers.

Community engagement should be led by the city and NOT by the developers Any future plans should include dedicating a substantial percentage of open space for public use.

If you cannot fulfill your obligations to represent the citizens, please consider another job, public office is not right for you.

We as citizens are getting tired of the city of San Jose consistently siding with the developers and turning this beautiful city into a mess, please stop ruining the city for the rest of us.

Thank you.

Ramesh Gunna
95129
Public Record: 23
12/14/22, 12:37 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 12:38 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Jacqueline Marcoida 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:11 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:08 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Jacqueline Marcoida 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Jacqueline Marcoida
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 24
12/14/22, 12:38 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Kathy DeMartini 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:10 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:21 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Kathy DeMartini 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

There is not much open space left in the north end of Evergreen and part of the community plan was to have open space at the old golf course location.

I definitely believe the community should have inputs for planning in our neighborhood considering the additional traffic, needed resources including water and utilities given the shortages and requests to water ration and power flex requests.

The community will approve much faster if they are apart of the decisions.

Thank you for your consideration and attention to this matter.

Kathy DeMartini
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s).

Public Record: 25
12/14/22, 12:38 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 12:39 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Rachel Welch 95128 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:14 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:22 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Rachel Welch 95128 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

I urge the council to follow the mayor's memo calling for community led input to decide how to use the 114 acres that will benefit the Eastside residents. We urge to keep this as open space .

Rachel Welch
Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer. Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Rachel Welch
95128
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 26
12/14/22, 12:40 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Thomas Haney 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:13 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 11:00 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Thomas Haney 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

No exceptions for your developer friends at the public expense.

Thomas Haney
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 27
12/14/22, 12:40 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Ashley Bowman 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:13 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 11:16 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Ashley Bowman 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Ashley Bowman
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 28
12/14/22, 12:40 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Jim Frizzell 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:11 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 11:27 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Jim Frizzell 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Jim Frizzell
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 29
12/14/22, 12:41 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Mike Alvarado 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:10 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 11:42 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Mike Alvarado 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

The Evergreen Visioning Process proved a community led and City facilitated process is optimal for ensuring the voice of residents is heard.

Mike Alvarado
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 30
12/14/22, 12:54 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Candelario Lopez 95122 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:28 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 6:29 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Candelario Lopez 95122 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Candelario Lopez
95122
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 31
12/14/22, 12:55 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Danny Garza 95116 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:27 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 6:48 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Danny Garza 95116 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Danny Garza
95116
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 32
12/14/22, 12:56 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Carlos M DaSilva 95116 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:18 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 6:54 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Carlos M DaSilva 95116 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Carlos M DaSilva
95116
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 33
12/14/22, 12:59 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: PAUL ELLIOT 95139 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:17 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 7:11 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: PAUL ELLIOT 95139 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

PAUL ELLIOT
95139
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 34
12/14/22, 1:01 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Kent Campbell 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:15 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 7:35 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Kent Campbell 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Kent Campbell
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 35
12/14/22, 1:02 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Teresa Deardorff 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:27 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 8:04 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Teresa Deardorff 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

We vote you in NOW DO WHAT WE WANT NOT WHAT YOU WANT AND LINE YOUR POCKET!!!!
Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer. Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Teresa Deardorff
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 36
12/14/22, 1:02 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Tina Rivera 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:19 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 8:31 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Tina Rivera 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Why are you insisting on one developer’s plan which would be for his benefit only? Instead do listen to your staff (that is why you hired them) and act on what we, the residents that will be affected by this want and need.

Thank you, Tina
Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer. Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Tina Rivera
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 37
12/14/22, 1:03 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Geoffrey Lynch 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:17 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 8:41 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Geoffrey Lynch 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Geoffrey Lynch
95112
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 38
12/14/22, 1:07 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Linda E Lopez 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:28 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 9:38 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Linda E Lopez 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Leave our current open space alone. We dont need every inch of San Jose developed into housing no one can afford. It was wrong to take away the Flea Market space. It is wrong to close Reid-Hillview and now it is wrong to build on the old golf course. Only one who benefits is the developer and possibly the city counsel.

Linda E Lopez
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 39
12/14/22, 1:08 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Robert Freitas 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:19 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 9:46 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Robert Freitas 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Robert Freitas
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 40
12/14/22, 1:09 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Kay Mendelsohn 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:18 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 9:52 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Kay Mendelsohn 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Kay Mendelsohn
95135
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 41
12/14/22, 1:09 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Michael Bolli 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:16 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 10:18 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Michael Bolli 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Michael Bolli
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 42
12/14/22, 1:20 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Cathie Cisneros 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:17 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 10:35 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Cathie Cisneros 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Cathie Cisneros
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 43
12/14/22, 1:21 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Pat Waite 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:28 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 11:33 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Pat Waite 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Pat Waite
95135
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 44
12/14/22, 1:22 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Megan King 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:27 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 11:38 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Megan King 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Megan King
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 45
12/14/22, 1:22 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: George Southland 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:18 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 11:41 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: George Southland 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

George Southland
95135
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 46
12/14/22, 1:23 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Thomas Carlino 95117 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:18 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 11:42 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Thomas Carlino 95117 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Thomas Carlino
95117
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 47
12/14/22, 1:23 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Stephanie dawn brooks 95117 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:15 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 11:53 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Stephanie dawn brooks 95117 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Stephanie dawn brooks
95117
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 48
12/14/22, 1:24 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Julie Will 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:28 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 5:21 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Julie Will 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Julie Will
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 49
12/14/22, 1:24 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Sophia Dodson 95117 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:27 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 6:52 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Sophia Dodson 95117 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Sophia Dodson
95117
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 50
12/14/22, 1:25 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Camillia Brennan 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:18 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 8:07 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Camillia Brennan 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Camillia Brennan
95135
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 51
12/14/22, 1:42 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Veronica Licon 95122 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:17 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 12:29 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Veronica Licon 95122 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

How about a bike trail or a walking trail. Nice playgrounds. A swimming pool.

Veronica Licon
95122
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 52
12/14/22, 1:45 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: John Gallo 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:15 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 7:17 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: John Gallo 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

John Gallo
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 53
12/14/22, 1:46 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Pamela Blanchard 95132 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:29 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 8:29 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Pamela Blanchard 95132 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Pamela Blanchard
95132
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 54
12/14/22, 1:47 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Derrol Blanchard 95132 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:29 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 8:30 AM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Derrol Blanchard 95132 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Derrol Blanchard
95132
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 55
12/14/22, 1:48 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: ANGELITO F GONZAGA 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:30 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 12:20 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: ANGELITO F GONZAGA 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Dear City Council, Please, we need to follow the community engagement process that should be cityled, and NOT developer-led, and that future plans for this site should include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space. Need to keep the OPEN SPACE for the community and help reduce the congestion and TRAFFIC.

ANGELITO F GONZAGA
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United Public Record: 56
12/14/22, 1:48 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 1:48 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: ANGELITO F GONZAGA 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:29 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 12:22 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: ANGELITO F GONZAGA 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Angelo Gonzaga
95148
Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer. Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Public Record: 57
12/14/22, 1:48 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
12/14/22, 1:50 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Barbara A Espinoza 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:29 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: District 5 United <
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 3:51 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Barbara A Espinoza 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Barbara A Espinoza
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 58
12/14/22, 1:50 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Lucienne Klopper 95120-5811 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:29 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 4:53 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Lucienne Klopper 95120-5811 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Lucienne Klopper
95120-5811
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 59
12/14/22, 1:51 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Gunnels 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:28 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 7:26 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Gunnels 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Enough already!
Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer. Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Gunnels
95127
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 60
12/14/22, 1:51 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Arlene Favila 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 3:29 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Please take our short survey.

From: San Jose United <
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 9:13 PM
To: < District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Arlene Favila 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

This alliance that some council members have with the Developer(s) is obviously not motivated by the citizen’s or the communities they serve. The city-led community engagement process ensures the opportunity for citizens to engage in the processes involving Private Recreation and Open Space lands, specifically the region of Pleasant Hills Golf Course. We need to pursue this approach of a city-led community engagement process.

I cannot help but wonder what would compel some city council members to want the process to be led by the developer? I urge these city council members to reconsider their positions.

Thank you.

Arlene Favila
95148
Public Record: 61
12/14/22, 1:51 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Michelle Rose 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 4:31 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 3:25 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Michelle Rose 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: San Jose United <
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 10:38 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Michelle Rose 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Michelle Rose
95112
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 62
12/14/22, 1:53 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: David Rosa 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Mon 12/12/2022 4:31 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 3:25 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: David Rosa 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: San Jose United <
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 10:39 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: David Rosa 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

David Rosa
95112
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 63
12/14/22, 1:54 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Jim Carter 95125 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Tue 12/13/2022 9:02 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 8:45 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Jim Carter 95125 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: San Jose United <
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 6:52 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Jim Carter 95125 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

I am in complete support of a city led outreach effort regarding the the former golf course land Thank you
Jim Carter
Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Jim Carter
95125
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 64
12/14/22, 1:55 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 Fw: Heidi Boyd 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Tue 12/13/2022 11:02 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 10:56 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Heidi Boyd 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process -----Original Message-----
From: San Jose United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 9:15 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Heidi Boyd 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process [External Email]
Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Since the potential development of the old Pleasant Hills Golf Course will affect hundreds/a thousand? households the community should have a say in how or if it’s developed Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer. Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for Public Record: 65
12/14/22, 1:55 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 public open space.

Heidi Boyd
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s).
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net Community Working Together
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
12/14/22, 1:55 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Yolanda 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Tue 12/13/2022 12:12 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 11:59 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Yolanda 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: San Jose United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 10:33 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Yolanda 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Yolanda
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 66
12/14/22, 1:56 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Teniya Sutton 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Tue 12/13/2022 1:53 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 1:38 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Teniya Sutton 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: San Jose United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 11:44 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Teniya Sutton 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Teniya Sutton
95127
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 67
12/14/22, 1:56 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Dina Pereira 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Wed 12/14/2022 8:09 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2022 8:06 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Dina Pereira 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: District 5 United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 2:43 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Dina Pereira 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,000+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Dina Pereira
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 68
12/14/22, 1:57 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Maria Moitoso 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Wed 12/14/2022 8:10 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2022 8:06 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Maria Moitoso 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: District 5 United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 9:38 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Maria Moitoso 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Maria Moitoso
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 69
12/15/22, 8:18 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Cathie Cisneros 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Thu 12/15/2022 8:03 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: San Jose United <
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2022 10:11 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Cathie Cisneros 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Cathie Cisneros
95127
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 70
12/22/22, 4:38 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
FW: Maria G Reyes 95122 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 12/20/2022 8:17 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: District 5 United < >
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 7:13 AM
To: ; District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Maria G Reyes 95122 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Council members are elected by the communities that pay their salaries. Why is the City even considering a developer to make this decision for our communities? Developers come into our communities and ruin our communities. They do not live here and have no vested interest in the outcome of their greedy projects.

When they leave, our communities are turned into ghettos.

Our communities deserve better. We have a right to keep this open space for the betterment of our families.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Maria G Reyes
95122
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United Public Record: 71
12/22/22, 4:38 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
12/22/22, 4:44 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Marilynn Smith 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Thu 12/22/2022 4:44 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: District 5 United
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 7:20 AM
To: < >; District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; < >
Subject: Marilynn Smith 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Please make use of city staff to lead the input process. It would be fairer than a developer- led process.

East San Jose needs parks as well as housing as well as income generating properties. Eastside residents, my neighbors, should play a strong role in deciding how to use this land Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer. Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Marilynn Smith
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 72
12/22/22, 4:44 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important [External Email]
FW: HOLLY PELKING 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 12/20/2022 8:18 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: District 5 United < >
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 8:02 AM
To: ; District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: HOLLY PELKING 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

I drive by this land twice a week on my way to my gym. It is a piece of calm in the midst of city noise and visual clutter of buildings and their concrete. I am glad there will be some development on this land, however I feel the people who already live here and have to live with the outcome need to have input about that outcome. I also believe a developer who may not have any vested interest in the livable neighborhood does not have the aesthetic value of this land in mind.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

HOLLY PELKING
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 73
12/22/22, 4:45 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Michael Dean Gokey 95127-3044 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 12/20/2022 9:03 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: District 5 United < >
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 8:21 AM
To: ; District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Michael Dean Gokey 95127-3044 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Michael Dean Gokey
95127-3044
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 74
1/4/23, 8:53 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Christine Smythe 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:51 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: District 5 United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 10:58 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; ; Subject: Christine Smythe 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

The traffic is so bad we have been building on everything. The person who wants to build does not care the mess they will make. They only care the money they will make Please stop it . I have lived my whole life on the Eastside and it is crazy what you aloud.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Christine Smythe
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 75
1/4/23, 8:53 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Eric Cho 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:50 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: District 5 United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 1:01 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Eric Cho 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Eric Cho
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 76
12/22/22, 4:46 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 FW: Jill Bohn 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Wed 12/21/2022 7:58 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> -----Original Message-----
From: District 5 United < >
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 4:10 PM
To: ; District2 <[email protected]>; District3
<[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; ;
Subject: Jill Bohn 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process [External Email]
Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Jill Bohn
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org Community Working Together
Public Record: 77
1/4/23, 8:56 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: singgih tan 95123 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:51 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: San Jose United <
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 10:22 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: singgih tan 95123 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.
singgih tan
95123
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 78
1/4/23, 8:44 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Gail Morman 95128 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Mon 1/2/2023 12:33 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2022 8:47 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Gail Morman 95128 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: San Jose United <
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 11:07 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Gail Morman 95128 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Gail Morman
95128
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 79
1/4/23, 9:00 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Angie Carrillo 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:50 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: District 5 United <
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 5:14 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Angie Carrillo 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Four generations of my family live in San Jose. (My parents met at Roosevelt Jr High when they were 12). I've seen enough changes to know that when developers lead the process, their interests take first priority. Sometimes to the detriment of the community.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Angie Carrillo
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 80
1/4/23, 9:01 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
FW: Mike Beggs 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:51 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: San Jose United <
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 6:33 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Mike Beggs 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

It is important for San Jose residents that our perspective be considered in the development plans for our city. The developer is motivated by costs and profits and meeting the bare minimum of the permitting and rules in place. That must be balanced by the needs of those who live with the developer’s decisions long after they have moved onto their next project. The value to residents and the non-monetary esthetics of a public site are achieved by meeting the desires of the residents. Please use a city-staff led community input process.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Mike Beggs
95112
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 81
1/4/23, 9:02 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
FW: Sumit Wattal 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:50 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: San Jose United <
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 8:06 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Sumit Wattal 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

It is important that we have the residents engaged in the process to shape up the area they have been living in. That is a sign of a functioning democracy. There could be suggestions that reduce or offset the environment impact from construction.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Sumit Wattal
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 82
1/4/23, 9:02 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
FW: Lawrence J Cargnoni 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:50 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: San Jose United <
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 8:11 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Lawrence J Cargnoni 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Listen to the people who pay for your salaries!
Solve our problems!
You are paid to represent US – not just the special interests that have you in their pockets.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Lawrence J Cargnoni
95135
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 83
1/4/23, 9:03 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Jennifer Lott 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:51 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: District 5 United <
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 8:28 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Jennifer Lott 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Jennifer Lott
95135
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 84
1/4/23, 8:45 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Arvind Kumar 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Mon 1/2/2023 12:34 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2022 8:47 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Arvind Kumar 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: San Jose United <
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 5:43 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Arvind Kumar 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Please keep this area open space!
Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Arvind Kumar
95148
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 85
1/4/23, 8:46 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Stephanie Vargas 95133-2063 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process
Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Wed 1/4/2023 8:24 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 4:52 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Stephanie Vargas 95133-2063 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: San Jose United <
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 12:37 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Stephanie Vargas 95133-2063 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

We need open space! There is too much congestion in this city. It brings out impatience and aggression. People of all ages need space to breathe and to enjoy seeing nature. Enough with over development!
Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Stephanie Vargas
95133-2063
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 86
1/4/23, 9:06 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Mai Nguyen 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:51 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: District 5 United <
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 6:42 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Mai Nguyen 95148 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Mai Nguyen
95148
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 87
1/4/23, 9:06 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Mary Lindemuth 95118 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:51 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: San Jose United <
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 9:47 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Mary Lindemuth 95118 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Mary Lindemuth
95118
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 88
1/4/23, 9:08 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Dr Colin Ford 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:51 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: District 5 United <
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2022 9:05 AM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Dr Colin Ford 95135 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Dr Colin Ford
95135
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 89
1/4/23, 8:45 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Guadalupe Friaz 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Mon 1/2/2023 12:38 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2022 8:47 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Guadalupe Friaz 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process From: San Jose United <
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2022 4:30 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Guadalupe Friaz 95112 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Why do we have to take an extra step to have community members heard! Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Guadalupe Friaz
95112
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 90
1/4/23, 9:09 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
FW: SORTH 95150 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:51 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: San Jose United <
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2022 3:24 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: SORTH 95150 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Please consider a community led engagement, and please keep the golf course for recreational purposes.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

SORTH
95150
You may not use my contact information for any purpose other than to respond to my concern regarding the topic listed above, nor may you share my address with any other organization(s) or individual(s). --
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via San Jose United https://www.sanjoseunited.net
Community Working Together
Public Record: 91
1/4/23, 9:09 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Paul Zuniga 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 1/3/2023 4:50 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: District 5 United <
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2022 7:09 PM
To: District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Subject: Paul Zuniga 95127 - Policy 5-1, Use a City-led Community Engagement Process Dear City Council,
I join 1,100+ community members in urging you to use a city-led community engagement process for any development of areas zoned Private Recreation and Open Space, including the 114 acre Pleasant Hills Golf Course site.

Use a city-driven and very robust community engagement and visioning process like you are doing for sites a fraction of the size. The city and community should drive that process, not the developer.

Please also ensure any future plans for this site include dedication of a significant percentage of the site for public open space.

Paul Zuniga
95127
--
This mail was sent on behalf of a San Jose resident via District 5 United https://www.district5united.org
Community Working Together
Public Record: 92
12/14/22, 3:32 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important [External Email]
Fw: SJ Policy No.0-44 Response Letter
Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Tue 12/13/2022 3:54 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> 1 attachments (456 KB)
Response Policy No. 0-44 Letter.pdf;
From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 3:07 PM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: SJ Policy No.0-44 Response Letter
From: Yardenna Aaron < >
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 3:00 PM
To: District1 <[email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Peralez, Raul <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Carrasco, Magdalena <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Esparza, Maya <[email protected]>; Arenas, Sylvia <[email protected]>; Foley, Pam <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Cc: Cassie Peabody ; Rafael Ventura ; Victor Enriquez
< >
Subject: SJ Policy No.0-44 Response Letter
To whom it may concern:

Please accept this letter on behalf of our organization, the Maintenance Cooperation Trust Fund (MCTF). The letter is concerning the City of San Jose Wage Theft Policy No. 0-44. If any additional information is needed, please do not hesitate in contacting me.

Regards,
--
Yardenna Aaron
Executive Director
Maintenance Cooperation Trust Fund (MCTF)
Public Record: 93
12/14/22, 3:32 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. -Office
Cell
www.janitorialwatch.org
December 13, 2022
San Jose City Council
200 E. Santa Clara St.

San Jose, California 95113
Dear San Jose City Council ,
I am writing on behalf of the MCTF to urge the San Jose City Council to re-examine the City’s ‘Wage Theft Prevention Policy’ No. 0-44. The Maintenance Cooperation Trust Fund (MCTF) is a California statewide watchdog organization whose mission is to abolish illegal and unfair business practices in the janitorial industry. The MCTF investigates allegations of employment law violations and partners with local, state, and federal enforcement agencies to hold unscrupulous contractors accountable. Since our founding in 1999, we have fought wage theft in all of its forms.

While we are in support of the policy’s overall purpose, “To prevent wage theft on City contracts”, we caution there may be unintended consequences of disqualifying responsible employers from being awarded city contracts. Part 2 of the Disqualification Circumstances is especially problematic. This section of the policy may disqualify a contractor that has satisfied a judgment in the past 5 years. This section of the policy could disqualify long standing companies that have become responsible employers in the past 5 years.

Additionally, this provision of the policy favors small contractors with little or no employment history.

As a statewide watchdog organization, we have investigated and filed complaints against large janitorial contractors. As a result of our investigations, some of these contractors have “cleaned up their act” and become law abiding responsible employers. We would hate to see some of these employers lose out to smaller contractors with no traceable employment history.

We ask the San Jose City Council to take time to re-examine the implications of this policy on large employers that have satisfied wage and hour judgements.

Sincerely,
Yardenna Aaron, Executive Director
12/14/22, 3:33 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

FW: Support Letter - Energy Hub (Item 10.2)
Taber, Toni <[email protected]>
Tue 12/13/2022 5:47 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: Derrick Seaver < >
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 3:22 PM
To: Derrick Seaver < >
Subject: Support Letter - Energy Hub (Item 10.2)
Mayor Liccardo and Members of the San Jose City Council:

Attached, please find a letter of support from the San Jose Chamber of Commerce for Item 10.2 on todays’ Council agenda. We greatly appreciate your consideration of our position and look forward to an affirmative vote on the item when it comes before you this evening.

Derrick Seaver
President & CEO
San Jose Chamber of Commerce
Public Record: 94
December 13, 2022
San Jose City Council
Mayor Sam Liccardo
200 E. Santa Clara Street
San Jose, CA 95113
Mayor Liccardo & San Jose City Council Members:

On behalf of the San Jose Chamber of Commerce I am writing to you today to ask for your support of the Energy Hub project, item 10.2 on the December 13, 2022, Council agenda. We respectfully request your support of staff recommendations on Items 1 & 2 and full approval of the proposed project.

Members of the Chamber of Commerce, as well as most residents of our city, believe that the shortage of housing in our region is a significant impediment to economic growth and competitiveness, and that correcting the shortage is an imperative. The project as proposed would bring 194 residential units to San Jose at a location that will soon be served by the BART expansion into downtown.

This project will also serve as a catalyst to reinvigorate an area that was once one of the most vibrant spots in the city. With residential units comes new downtown residents, and with them comes purchasing power and vibrancy that will benefit all the small businesses that make up the heart of Downtown San Jose.

Finally, the project as proposed includes more than 30,000 square feet of commercial and retail space on the ground levels. In addition to the positive economic impact of such development, this also serves to bring a more vibrant retail strategy to downtown at a time when it is most desperately needed.

For these reasons, we would respectfully request an affirmative vote on the Energy Hub project – item 10.2 - when it comes before you on December 13. We thank you for your consideration, and for all you do to make San Jose a world class place to start and grow your business.

Sincerely,
Derrick Seaver
12/22/22, 4:51 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Letter from Destination: Home re Affordable Housing Siting Policy (Item 8.2 on 12.6 agenda(
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Thu 12/22/2022 4:51 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: District 10 <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 2:36 PM
To: < >
Cc: The Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; District2 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Letter from Destination: Home re Affordable Housing Siting Policy (Item 8.2 on 12.6 agenda( Hello David,
Thank you for reaching out to our office expressing your support for the proposed Affordable Housing Siting Policy. We appreciate your organization's feedback and will take it into consideration as we move forward in addressing housing in San Jose.

D10 Intern
How is our service? Click here to give us feedback!
On Fri, 2 Dec at 3:07 PM , David Low < > wrote:

Honorable Mayor & City Council,
Attached is a letter from Destination: Home CEO Jennifer Loving expressing our organization's support for the proposed Affordable Housing Siting Policy that will be discussed at your December 6th meeting. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or would like to discuss this issue further.

Thank you,
David
Public Record: 95
12/22/22, 4:51 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

DAVID LOW
Director of Policy & Communications
T | C
A
DestinationHomeSV.org
12/22/22, 4:52 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/2 [External Email]
Fw: Digital Billboards and Suicide
Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Thu 12/22/2022 9:29 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: Mark Baker < >
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 10:22 PM
To: Liccardo, Sam <[email protected]>
Cc: < >;
< >; < >; Airport
Commission 1 <[email protected]>; Airport Commission 3 <[email protected]>; Airport Commission 4 <[email protected]>; Airport Commission 5 <[email protected]>; Airport Commission 6 <[email protected]>; Airport Commission 7 <[email protected]>; Airport Commission 8 <[email protected]>; Airport Commission 9 <[email protected]>; Airport Commission 10 <[email protected]>; Airport Commission CW <[email protected]>; Kazmierczak, Matthew < >; Jones, Chappie <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Davis, Dev <[email protected]>; Carrasco, Magdalena <[email protected]>; Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>; Esparza, Maya <[email protected]>; Foley, Pam <[email protected]>; Peralez, Raul <[email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Arenas, Sylvia <[email protected]>; Petersen, Adam <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; NO DIGITAL BILLBOARDS IN SAN JOSE < >; CAO Main <[email protected]>; ADA <[email protected]>
Subject: Digital Billboards and Suicide
Dear Sam Liccardo, Mayor, San Jose, CA,
I am a former resident of San Jose and I read your opinion article in the New York Times about San Jose's decision to impose fees and insurance requirements for gun ownership. These very progressive ideas are to be commended and I truly hope that they are effective.

But in your article you mention suicide. Your support of digital LED advertising billboards in San Jose will likely increase suicide rates. We humans cannot neurologically process the bombardment of our senses by these visible radiation devices. Digital billboards violate our fundamental human rights. If you are concerned about quality of life and reducing suicides, then you must act to stop the installation of digital billboards.

LED visible radiation is not tolerated at all by certain individuals. The installation of LED billboards will confine some people to their homes because they will no longer be able to access San Jose streets and businesses. This is discrimination and is in direct opposition to your efforts to control gun violence with creative solutions.

Public Record: 96
12/22/22, 4:52 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Please protect San Jose residents and guests by eliminating all LED digital advertising signs.

Sincerely,
Mark Baker
President
Soft Lights Foundation
www.softlights.org
1/4/23, 8:41 AM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5MT… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Fw: Measure A (2016) - Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee City Clerk <[email protected]>
Wed 1/4/2023 8:07 AM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> 1 attachments (9 MB)
Measure A Annual Report and Fourth Quarter Report Fiscal Year 2021-2022.pdf; From: BoardOperations < >
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2022 2:45 PM
To: BoardOperations < >
Subject: Measure A (2016) - Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important Hello,
At its regularly scheduled meeting held on November 1, 2022 (Item No. 53), the County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors receive report from Measure A (2016 Housing Bond) Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Annual Report and Fourth Quarter Report from the Independent Auditor.

Enclosed is a pdf copy of the Measure A (2016 Housing Bond) - Independent Citizen's Oversight Committee Fourth Quarter Report and Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Annual Report from the Independent Auditor for your records. If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact our office.

Regards,
Joanna Saucedo
Extra-help, Board Operations
Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
NOTICE:

This email message and/or its attachments may contain information that is confidential or restricted. It is intended only for the individuals named as recipients in the message. If you are NOT an authorized recipient, you are prohibited from using, delivering, distributing, printing, copying, or disclosing the message or content to others and must delete the message from your computer. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email.

Public Record: 97
Office of the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors
TDD
Measure A (2016 Housing Bond) Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee Chairperson: Lawrence E. Stone
October 17, 2022
Board of Supervisors
County of Santa Clara
Subject: Citizen's Oversight Committees Measw-e A 2016 Affordable I ousing Bond Program Independent Advisor's Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Dear Board of Supervisors:

Please find attached the following documents for yow- review prepared by Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP (MGO) and approved by the Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program (Program) Citizen's Oversight Committee (Committee) at our September 22, 2022 meeting:
• County of Santa Clara Citizen's Oversight Committee's Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor's Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 • Performance Dashboard/Website Snapshots
The Committee presents the Board of Supervisors the following key takeaways regarding the Program, as of June 30, 2022.

1. A policy decision is required by the Board of Supervisors for the unit goal for rapid rehousing (RRH).

2. The Program has $157 .05 million of committed funds remaining to finance the development of 1,107 units (with housing goals) in order to reach its goal of financing 4,800 units of affordable housing. Of the 44 development and renovation projects approved by the Board, 10 (711 units) are completed, 15 (1,297 units) are in construction, 18 (1,582 units) are securing financing, and one (103 units) is obtaining land use approval.

3. The County's Office of Supportive Housing's management of the Program is effective.

In addition to the key takeaways discussed above, the Committee provides an update on the previously communicated recommendations in the Executive Summary section of the accompanying report. The Committee would like to thank the County's Office of Supportive Housing for their hard work and dedication to providing affordable housing in the County.

Board of Supervisors: Mike Wassennan, Cindy Chavez, Otto Lee, Susan Ellenberg, S. Joseph Simitian Countv Executive: Jeffrev V. Smith
Paget of 2
Received: 11/01/2022
If you have any questions regarding this transmittal memorandum or the attached reports, please feel free to contact me at or
Sincerely,
Chairperson
Measure A (2016 Housing Bond) Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee Board of Supervisors: Mike Wasserman, Cindy Chavez, Otto Lee, Susan Ellenberg, S. Joseph Simitian County Executive: Jeffrey V. Smith
Page2of2
County of Santa Clara
Citizen’s Oversight Committee’s Measure A 2016
Affordable Housing Bond Program
Independent Advisor’s Annual Report
and
Fourth Quarter Report
Fiscal Year 2021-2022
September 22, 2022
Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 2 of 45
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................... 3 Message to the Board of Supervisors............................................................................................................. 3 Bond Proceeds .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Annual Update – Fiscal Year 2021-22............................................................................................................ 6 Quarterly Update............................................................................................................................................ 7 Progress to Date ............................................................................................................................................ 7 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................11 Period in Review ..........................................................................................................................................11 Purpose of the Measure A Affordable Housing Bond Program.....................................................................11 Purpose of the Independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee.........................................................................11 Activity Reported: Citizens’ Oversight Committee ........................................................................................11 Summary of Program Activity in Fourth Quarter...........................................................................................12 SECTION 1 – TOTAL PROGRAM COMMITMENTS .......................................................................................13 SECTION 2 – DEVELOPMENT AND RENOVATION PROJECTS ..................................................................14

2.1 – Development and Renovation Projects’ Financials..............................................................................14

2.2 – Program Expenditures per Housing Project.........................................................................................19

2.3 – Measure A Leveraging Ratio ...............................................................................................................23

2.3.1 – Average vs. Median Leveraging Ratios.........................................................................................23

2.3.2 – Leveraging Ratio vs. Program’s Estimated Cost Share per Unit ...................................................24

2.3.3 – Measure A Leveraging Ratio By Project .......................................................................................25

2.4 – Housing Development Units................................................................................................................28

2.4.1 – Housing Types..............................................................................................................................28

2.4.2 – Total Housing Development Units................................................................................................. 28

2.4.3 – Housing Development Goals ........................................................................................................29

2.5 – Housing Development Milestones .......................................................................................................31

2.5.1 – Significant Activities by Development and Renovation Projects ....................................................35 SECTION 3 – PROPERTIES AND PARTNERSHIPS......................................................................................38

3.1 – Properties’ Financial Data ...................................................................................................................38

3.2 – Partnership Projects’ Financial Data....................................................................................................40 SECTION 4 – AFFORDABLE HOUSING LOAN PROGRAMS ........................................................................41

4.1 – First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program (Empower Homebuyers).................................................41

4.2 – Housing Trust Silicon Valley (HTSV) – Supportive Housing Fund (SHF)............................................. 43 SECTION 5 – GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS.............................................................................................44

5.1 – 2017 Series A Housing General Obligation Bonds ..............................................................................44

5.2 – 2021 Series B Housing General Obligation Bonds ..............................................................................45 Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 3 of 45

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Message to the Board of Supervisors
Background
This report provides an update on the activity regarding the County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program (Program) and to its Citizens’ Oversight Committee (Committee) for the fiscal year (FY) 2021-22, from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. This report also provides an update on the activity for the fourth quarter of FY 2021-22, from April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022.

The Program, approved by Santa Clara County (County) voters in 2016, authorizes the issuance of up to $950 million in general obligation bonds for the acquisition or improvement of real property in order to provide affordable local housing for vulnerable populations within Santa Clara County. The Program has issued $600 million in bonds: $250 million in October 2017 and $350 million in July 2021.

Key Takeaways
The Committee presents the Board of Supervisors the following key takeaways regarding the Program, as of June 30, 2022.

1. A policy decision is required by the Board of Supervisors for the unit goal for rapid rehousing (RRH).

2. The Program has $157.05 million of committed funds remaining to finance the development of 1,107 units (with housing goals) in order to reach its goal of financing 4,800 units of affordable housing. Of the 44 development and renovation projects approved by the Board of Supervisors, 10 (710 units) are completed, 15 (1,297 units) are in construction, 18 (1,582 units) are securing financing, and one (103 units) is obtaining land use approval.

3. The County’s Office of Supportive Housing’s management of the Program is effective.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 4 of 45
Additional Information
Despite numerous delays and obstacles, the Program is progressing in its development of affordable housing units and the County’s Office of Supportive Housing has managed the Program effectively. While the Program is moving forward to its goal, the Committee has the following concerns as of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022:

1. The Program had 1,107 units remaining to finance to meet its goal of 4,800 units. 1,099 units will need to be rapid rehousing (RRH) in order to meet the RRH goal of 1,600 units.

2. Whether the Program will be able to finance the remaining 1,107 units with the $157.05 million remaining in available committed program funds. The Program estimates it will commit all funds by December 2022.

3. Eighteen development and renovation projects are still working to secure financing and the Program is unable to predict if all the projects will obtain financing and when. Developers have up to 3 years to secure all financing before the Program considers reallocating a project’s committed program funds to another project. The longer it takes for a project to secure financing the more likely the overall project cost will increase and the less likely a developer will be able to obtain sufficient financing and build the affordable housing units.

As of June 30, 2022, the Program had committed in total 83.47 percent or $792.95 million of the $950 million allowable bond proceeds. The Program had committed $583.32 million for 44 development and renovation projects, which will provide 3,693 units and 76.94 percent of the Program’s unit goal once constructed. The increased leveraging of other funding sources has allowed the Program to continue working towards its goal despite the escalating costs of construction. As of June 30, 2022, the average Measure A Leveraging Ratio was

4.56, which means the Program secured outside investments of over $4.50 for every $1 dollar of Measure A funding
In addition, the Committee continues to monitor the following previously identified issues with the Program:

1. The Program’s delays in delivering affordable housing units. The increasing construction costs, labor shortages, and inflation could cause the Program’s development and renovation projects to take longer to complete and to cost more than initially anticipated. In addition, while leveraging multiple sources of funding for each project enables more projects overall to be funded, the inclusion of multiple parties increases the projects’ vulnerability to delays and resulting increase in costs depending on the length of delay. Therefore, the County should consider ways to create pools of stopgap funding to overcome any potential delays.

Recommendations:

The Committee recommends the Board of Supervisors:
• Continue to support the efforts of OSH to seek additional funding sources, especially the new State legislation and federal legislation.
• Track the U.S. White House’s Housing Supply Action Plan and its possible effect on the Program. The Housing Supply Action Plan includes expanding and improving existing forms of federal financing, such as reforms to the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), which provides credits to private investors developing affordable rental housing, and the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), which provides grants to states and localities that communities use to fund a wide range of housing activities. • Consider studying the use of multiple sources of funding for projects and determine whether the use of multiple parties increases the risk of delays and increased project costs. • Consider conducting a study on the effects of the escalating construction costs, labor shortages, and inflation on the Program in order to determine if changes need be made to the Program.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 5 of 45

2. The slowness in spending committed funds. As of June 30, 2022, the Program had committed $792.95 million or 83.47 percent of the $950 million allowable bond proceeds, but had only spent $469.64 million of the $600 million bond proceeds issued and received. The variance between Program funds committed and spent is partly due to the timing of construction costs and to the funding structure for a number of projects which have the Program’s committed funds being used for permanent financing after the completion of construction.

3. The slow rate of development of rapid rehousing (RRH) units, as shown in Section 2.4 Exhibit 7. Only 501 units or 31.31 percent of the 1,600 unit goal have been approved by the Board of Supervisors. The Committee understands it is harder to obtain funding for RRH projects due to the client type and housing needs.

Recommendation:

The Committee recommends the Board of Supervisors make a policy decision for the Program’s RRH unit goal.

4. There is a lack of evenly or diverse geographic distribution of the Program’s projects. The Program’s current 44 development and renovation projects, 20 properties, and 4 partnership projects are located within nine cities in the County1
; 45 of the 68 projects are located in the City of San Jose. The Committee recognizes that OSH has been actively working with cities in the County to assist in their developing of affordable housing. Two of the development projects added in the fourth quarter of FY 2021-22 were not in San Jose, but in Morgan Hill and Sunnyvale. OSH has developed development plans, negotiated memorandums of understanding (MOUs) for partnership projects, and offered grants. The additional Measure A goals include the following geographic areas for distribution: Campbell, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Palo Alto, Saratoga, Sunnyvale, the unincorporated county, and District 8 of San Jose.

Recommendations:

The Committee recommends the Board of Supervisors:
• Continue encouraging cities to participate in the Program. • Continue to support the efforts of OSH in developing relationships with cities other than the City of San Jose.

5. There is a lack of effectiveness with the First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program (Empower Homebuyers), as shown in Section 4.1 Exhibits 11 and 12. Empower Homebuyers continues to have a low number of applications that make it beyond pre-screening (i.e., intake applications) to the successful funding of a new loan (i.e., closed). The Empower Homebuyers’ Santa Clara County Program Guidelines version 7 (guidelines), approved by the Board of Supervisors on November 16, 2021, includes homeownership as a project type and other changes, which Program staff believe will provide additional workforce and homeownership housing opportunities for the community. The Program was awarded $5 million of CalHome Program funding from the California Department of Housing and Community Development. The Program intends to use the funds for its homeownership program within the next six months.

1 Projects are located in the nine cities of Cupertino, Gilroy, Los Altos, Milpitas, Morgan Hill, Mountain View, San Jose, Santa Clara and Sunnyvale.

The Committee recommends the Board of Supervisors:
• Continue to support the efforts of OSH to revise the First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program. • Monitor the activity of the Empower Homebuyers Program and the impact of the CalHome Program funds over the next six months.

The Committee would like to thank the County’s Office of Supportive Housing for their hard work and dedication to providing affordable housing in the County.

Bond Proceeds
During the fourth quarter of FY 2021-22, the Program’s bond activity was as follows:

The Program’s net spending of bond proceeds amounted to $43.48 million during the fourth quarter of FY 2021- 22, which was primarily used for development and renovation projects and property acquisition.

Annual Update – Fiscal Year 2021-22
During FY 2021-22, the Program committed funds of $99.19 million to nine development projects with 1,061 units, 1 renovation project with 102 units, and 4 properties.

During FY 2021-22, the Program spent the following:

Development and Renovation projects $ 131,362,536
Property acquisitions 62,202,933
Partnership projects 246,438
Bridge Loan for Hillview Court 5,920,469
First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program 2,149,137
Administrative costs 85,697
Spending during FY 2021-22 $ 201,967,210
Balance of Bond Proceeds
at March 31, 2022 $ 174,012,249
Other revenues 328,923
Interfund transfers (420,826)
Change in accounts payable 2,101,859
Spending during the quarter (43,482,389)
Net decrease in bond proceeds (41,472,433)
Balance of Bond Proceeds
at June 30, 2022 $ 132,539,816
Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 7 of 45
During FY 2021-22, the Program accomplished the following, as described in Section 2.5:
• Completed four projects with 530 total units – Quetzal Gardens, Iamesi Village, Calabazas Apartments, and Curtner Studios.
• Started construction of seven projects with 544 total units – Sango Court, Mariposa Place, Auzerais, Vitalia, Kifer Senior Apartments and Royal Oak Village.
• Secured financing for two projects – Roosevelt Park and The Algarve. • Obtained land use approval for five projects – La Avenida, Alum Rock Multifamily, Sunol-West San Carlos, The Charles and Lot 12.

Quarterly Update
During the fourth quarter of FY 2021-22, April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022, the Program spent the following:

Development and Renovation projects $ 40,888,391
Bridge Loan for Hillview Court 881,934
Property acquisitions 853,760
Partnership projects 24,101
First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program 811,900
Administrative costs 22,303
Spending during fourth quarter $ 43,482,389
During the fourth quarter of FY 2021-22, the Program had the following activity:
• Three development projects with a total of 332 units were added. See Section 2. • The following activity occurred (See Section 2.5):
 Two projects (Kifer Senior Apartments and Royal Oak Village) started construction;  Thirteen projects continued construction; and
 One project (Lot 12) obtained land use approval.

Progress to Date
As of June 30, 2022, the Program had committed $792.95 million as follows:
• $583.32 million for 44 development and renovation projects (see Section 2), • $25.0 million for a bridge loan for Hillview Court (see Section 2), • $146.93 million for 20 properties and $800,000 for 4 VTA partnerships (see Section 3), • $25.0 million to the first-time homebuyer assistance program (Empower Homebuyers) (Section 4.1), and • $11.9 million to the supportive housing fund (Section 4.2).

As of June 30, 2022, the Program had spent $469.64 million (Section 1). The Program had financed approximately 17.99 percent of total development and renovation costs for 44 projects, at an average per unit cost of approximately $122,212 (see Section 2.1), and 76.94 percent (3,693 units) of its goal of 4,800 affordable housing units (see Section 2.4).

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 8 of 45
Chart 1 below compares the Measure A affordable housing bonds authorized to the Program's commitment and spending of the bonds proceeds as of June 30, 2022. The left bar shows the total of the $950 million in affordable housing bonds authorized, of which $600 million have been issued. The right bar depicts the $792.95 million the Program has committed for affordable housing projects, which is split into three categories: expended, not expended, and available to commit. The County Board of Supervisors has approved the commitment of funds for projects beyond the $600 million in bonds issued. The Program does not anticipate those funds to be expended before the issuance of the remaining $350 million in bonds. The Program has committed more funds than spent mainly due to the funding structure of a number of projects, which will use the Program’s committed funds for permanent financing after the completion of construction.

Chart 1
Source: Data provided by the Office of Supportive Housing $600.00
$350.00
$469.64
$323.31
$157.05
$-
$200.00
$400.00
$600.00
$800.00
$1,000.00
$950M Bonds Authorized $792.95M Committed Funds
$157.05M Remaining Available
In Millions
Measure A Bonds Authorized vs. Program Committed Funds, as of June 30, 2022
Issued Remaining Authorized Expended Not Expended Available to Commit Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 9 of 45
Chart 2 below shows the number of units completed, in construction, and in pre-construction. As of June 30, 2022, a total of 3,693 units counted towards the goal of 4,800 units. There were 1,107 units remaining to be developed to reach the goal of 4,800 units.

Chart 2
Source: Data provided by the Office of Supportive Housing. *Note: Excludes the 270 pre-existing units for Curtner Studios (68 units, Completed), Markham I (103 units, Completed), and Markham II (99 units, In Construction), 751 moderate (MI) and low income (LI) units, and 59 property manager units.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 10 of 45
Development and renovation projects prepare timelines with dates for key development milestones to estimate when the project will be completed and submit revised timelines throughout the course of the projects. Chart 3 below shows for the Program’s development and renovation projects the cumulative number of units to be delivered in each calendar year from 2019 through 2026 based on the original projection dates, actual dates, and revised projection dates. The original projections total the 4,503 units that had been committed as of June 30, 2022. Due to the nature of the Program, the revised projection only includes development and renovation projects in construction.

Chart 3
Source: Data provided by the Office of Supportive Housing.

Note: The gray box is FY2021-22, which was expanded to show the projections by quarter.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 11 of 45

INTRODUCTION
Period in Review
This report provides an update on the activity regarding the County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program (Program) and its Citizens’ Oversight Committee (Committee) for the of FY 2021-22, from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. This report also provides an update on the activity for the fourth quarter of FY 2021-22, April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022.

Purpose of the Measure A Affordable Housing Bond Program Generate up to $950 million through the issuance of general obligation bonds for the acquisition or improvement of real property in order to provide affordable local housing for vulnerable populations within Santa Clara County.

Purpose of the Independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee In accordance with County Ordinance No. NS-300.902, the Committee was formed to serve as an advisory body to the County Board of Supervisors over the implementation of the Program with the following purpose:

1. To advise on whether the County is spending the bond proceeds for the stated purpose approved by voters and not for any other purpose;

2. To advise on whether the County has been spending bond proceeds efficiently, effectively, and in a timely manner;

3. To advise on whether the County’s issuance of bond proceeds and temporary investment of bond proceeds has been fiscally sound;

4. To recommend any changes to the County’s implementation of the Housing Bond in order to ensure that bond proceeds are spent for the stated purpose approved by voters; and

5. To conduct an annual review of the report issued by the County describing the amount of funds collected and expended, and the status of any project required or authorized to be funded.

Activity Reported: Citizens’ Oversight Committee
Oversight Committee Meetings and Report
During this reporting period, the Oversight Committee met on June 17, 2022, and one report was submitted and approved by the Committee: the Independent Advisor’s Third Quarter Report for Fiscal Year 2021-22. The report was subsequently forwarded by the County Clerk of the Board to the County Board of Supervisors and each city within the County.

Performance Dashboards
MGO collaborated with the Subcommittee of the Citizens’ Oversight Committee, the County’s Office of Supportive Housing, and the County’s Finance Agency to develop user-friendly and easily understandable dashboards that assist in presenting Program data and operational performance in order to promote accountability and transparency. The performance dashboards are located on the County’s Office of Supportive Housing’s website at https://www.sccgov.org/sites/osh/Pages/home.aspx.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 12 of 45
Summary of Program Activity in Fourth Quarter
The following information summarizes the different sections of the report and highlights the Program’s activities during the fourth quarter of FY 2021-22 or as of the quarter end, June 30, 2022:
• Section 1: The Program committed in total 83.47 percent of all allowable bond proceeds. The Program committed to development and renovation projects 61.40 percent of available bond proceeds to finance 76.94 percent of its housing goals.
• Section 2.1: During the quarter, the Program added three development projects. The Program committed $583.32 million for 44 development and renovation projects. • Section 2.2: 12 development and renovation projects expended $41.77 million during the quarter. As a result, the cumulative expenditures increased 13.37 percent to $354.19 million as of quarter end. • Section 2.3: During the quarter, the Program’s changes described in Section 2.1 caused the Measure A Leveraging Ratio to increase to an average of 4.56 of non-Measure A funds invested for every dollar of Measure A funding.
• Section 2.4: The Program’s current funding commitment will result in developing a total of 4,503 units: 3,693 units (76.94 percent) count toward the Program’s goal of 4,800 units, and an additional 810 units do not count toward the Program’s goal.
• Section 2.5: The following milestones were achieved during the quarter: two projects started construction; one project obtained land use approval; and three projects were added. • Section 3.1: The Program committed $146.93 million and expended $853,760 on one property during the quarter.
• Section 3.2: The Program committed $800,000 and expended $24,101 on the four VTA partnership projects during the quarter.
• Section 4.1: The First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program (Empower Homebuyers) received 252 intake applications, purchased 5 loans for $577,830, and expended $234,070 for the administration of the loan program during the quarter.
• Section 4.2: The Housing Trust Silicon Valley (HTSV) – Supportive Housing Fund (SHF) provided one predevelopment loan for $2.21 million during the quarter. • Section 5: The principal and interest outstanding on the 2017 Series A Housing General Obligation Bonds issued in October 2017 was $143.61 million. The principal and interest outstanding on the 2021 Series B Housing General Obligation Bonds issued in July 2021 was $418.19 million.

More information on Measure A, including an interactive performance dashboard, can be found online on the County’s Office of Supportive Housing’s website at https://osh.sccgov.org/housing-communitydevelopment/2016-measure-affordable-housing-bond.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 13 of 45
SECTION 1 – TOTAL PROGRAM COMMITMENTS
The 2016 Measure A Affordable Housing Bond Program approved by Santa Clara County voters authorized the issuance of up to $950 million in general obligation bonds to fund the Program. The Program has issued $600 million in bonds: $250 million in October 2017 and $350 million in July 2021.

As of June 30, 2022, the Program had committed a total of $792.95 million of the $950 million of bonds authorized, or 83.47 percent of all allowable bond proceeds. Although the total commitments to-date exceeded the amount available from the bonds issued of $600 million, the Program had only spent $469.64 million, or

78.27 percent of the $600 million of bond proceeds as of June 30, 2022. The Program does not anticipate spending more than the $600 million before the next issuance of bonds due to the funding structure of a number of the projects, which will use the Program’s committed funds for permanent financing after construction is completed.

As of June 30, 2022, the Program had committed $583.32 million of the $950 million of authorized bonds to development and renovation projects, or 61.40 percent of available bond proceeds. As discussed in Section

2.4.3, the $583.32 million will finance the development of 3,693 units that count towards the Program’s goal of 4,800 units, or 76.94 percent of the Program’s housing goals.

Exhibit 1 below provides a summary of the Program’s total committed and expended funds as of June 30, 2022.

Exhibit 1
Total Committed and Expended Program Funds
As of Fourth Quarter FY 2021-22
Project Name
Committed
Program
Funding
to-date
Total Program
Funds
Expended
to-date
Total Program
Funds
Expended
FY 2021-22
Percent of $950
million of
bonds
authorized a
Development and Renovation Projects
(Section 2) $ 583,319,628 $ 330,421,973 $ 131,362,536 61.40% Bridge Loan for Hillview Court (Section
2) b 25,000,000 23,736,368 5,920,469 2.63%
Property Acquisitions (Section 3.1) 146,933,900 96,970,390 62,202,933 15.47% Partnership Projects (Section 3.2) 800,000 250,857 246,438 0.08% First-Time Homebuyer Assistance
Program (Section 4.1) 25,000,000 5,852,940 2,149,137 1.25% HTSV – Supportive Housing Fund c
(Section 4.2) 11,900,000 11,900,000 11,900,000 2.63%
Consulting and audit services 512,127 85,697
Program Totals $ 792,953,528 $ 469,644,654 $ 213,867,210 83.47% Source: Data provided by the Office of Supportive Housing. a Percentage of $950 million bonds authorized is calculated by dividing the Committed Program Funding to-date column by $950,000,000 (maximum bonds approved).
b The bridge loan to the developers of Hillview Court will be repaid by the developers and the funds returned to the Program. c The HTSC – Supportive Housing Fund is a revolving loan program. It continuously loans up to $11.9 million to Program projects as the projects repay the loans.

SECTION 2 – DEVELOPMENT AND RENOVATION PROJECTS

2.1 – Development and Renovation Projects’ Financials
As shown in Exhibit 2 below and on the following pages, as of June, 2022, the Program had committed $583.32 million of Measure A funds for 44 development and renovation projects, which are estimated to finance approximately 17.99 percent of all total development and renovation costs, at an average cost share per unit of $122,212.

During the fourth quarter of FY 2021-22, the Program added three development projects with an estimated total development cost totaling $279.41 million and 332 units. Exhibit 2 below and on the following pages lists projects in two different categories (development projects and renovation projects) and sequences projects in each category in the order that the projects were approved by the County Board of Supervisors (program commitment date). For example, for development projects, Gateway Senior Apartments was the first project approved on November 14, 2017, and Sonora Court was the most recent housing development project approved on June 28, 2022.

Exhibit 22
Development and Renovation Projects’ Financial Data as of June 30, 2022 (unaudited)
# Project Name (City)
Program
Commitment
Date
No. of
Units/
Bedrooms
Estimated Total
Development
Cost a
Estimated
Total Cost
Per Unit
Committed
Program
Funding
To-Date
Program
Commitment
as % of Total
Estimated
Cost
Program's
Estimated
Cost Share
Per Unit
Development Projects
1 Gateway Senior Apartments (Gilroy) 11/14/2017
(Q2 FY18) 75/86 $34,972,249 $466,297 $ 7,500,000 21.45% $ 100,000 2 Crossings on Monterey (Morgan Hill) 11/14/2017
(Q2 FY18) 39/87 26,056,436 668,114 5,800,000 22.26 148,718 3 Leigh Avenue Senior Apartments
(San Jose)
11/14/2017
(Q2 FY18) 64/65 50,348,927 786,702 13,500,000 26.81 210,938 4 Villas on the Park (San Jose) 12/05/2017
(Q2 FY18) 84/85 41,955,319 499,468 7,200,000 17.16 85,714

2 Project names colored grey indicate projects completed.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 15 of 45
Development and Renovation Projects’ Financial Data as of June 30, 2022 (unaudited)
# Project Name (City)
Program
Commitment
Date
No. of
Units/
Bedrooms
Estimated Total
Development
Cost a
Estimated
Total Cost
Per Unit
Committed
Program
Funding
To-Date
Program
Commitment
as % of Total
Estimated
Cost
Program's
Estimated
Cost Share
Per Unit
5 The Veranda (Cupertino) 12/05/2017
(Q2 FY18) 19/20 11,937,416 628,285 1,000,000 8.38 52,632 6 Quetzal Gardens (San Jose) 12/05/2017
(Q2 FY18) 71/140 63,630,448 896,203 9,830,000 15.45 138,451 7 Sango Court (Milpitas) b 06/05/2018
(Q4 FY18) 102/153 72,488,258 710,669 16,000,000 22.07 156,863 8 Iamesi Village (formerly North San
Pedro Apartments) (San Jose)
06/05/2018
(Q4 FY18) 135/136 69,418,863 514,214 10,327,100 14.88 76,497 9 Calabazas (formerly Corvin)
Apartments (Santa Clara)
06/05/2018
(Q4 FY18) 145/146 104,480,486 720,555 29,000,000 27.76 200,000 10 Page Street Apartments (San Jose) 06/05/2018
(Q4 FY18) 82/83 55,178,667 672,911 14,000,000 25.37 170,732 11 Agrihood Senior Apartments
(Santa Clara)
12/18/2018
(Q2 FY19) 165/177 83,273,350 504,687 23,550,000 28.28 142,727 12 Mariposa Place (formerly West San
Carlos Housing) (San Jose)
12/18/2018
(Q2 FY19) 80/103 51,687,253 646,091 9,300,000 17.99 116,250 13 Blossom Hill Housing (San Jose) 12/18/2018
(Q2 FY19) 147/163 79,676,906 542,020 19,100,000 23.97 129,932 14 Vela Apartments (formerly Alum Rock
Family Housing) (San Jose)
12/18/2018
(Q2 FY19) 87/155 61,433,464 706,132 15,650,000 25.47 179,885 15 Roosevelt Park (San Jose) 12/18/2018
(Q2 FY19) 80/135 69,658,643 870,733 14,400,000 20.67 180,000 16 Auzerais Apartments (San Jose) 10/22/2019
(Q2 FY20) 130/148 92,062,481 708,173 13,200,000 14.34 101,538 17 Gallup & Mesa (San Jose) 10/22/2019
(Q2 FY20) 46/63 33,741,318 733,507 2,600,000 7.71 56,522 Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 16 of 45
Development and Renovation Projects’ Financial Data as of June 30, 2022 (unaudited)
# Project Name (City)
Program
Commitment
Date
No. of
Units/
Bedrooms
Estimated Total
Development
Cost a
Estimated
Total Cost
Per Unit
Committed
Program
Funding
To-Date
Program
Commitment
as % of Total
Estimated
Cost
Program's
Estimated
Cost Share
Per Unit
18 Villas at 4th St (formerly 4th and E.

Younger Apartments) (San Jose)
03/10/2020
(Q3 FY20) 94/94 46,811,323 497,993 7,500,000 16.02 79,787 19 Immanuel-Sobrato (formerly Moorpark)
Apartments (San Jose)
03/10/2020
(Q3 FY20) 108/110 73,548,992 681,009 16,654,646 22.64 154,210 20 Vitalia (formerly Bascom) Apartments
(San Jose) b
03/10/2020
(Q3 FY20) 79/101 64,054,314 810,814 15,800,000 24.67 200,000 21 Kifer Senior Apartments (Santa Clara) 03/10/2020
(Q3 FY20) 80/85 59,016,497 737,706 7,400,000 12.54 92,500 22 La Avenida Apartments
(Mountain View)
03/10/2020
(Q3 FY20) 100/111 78,077,678 780,777 19,000,000 24.33 190,000 23 Algarve Apartments (San Jose) 03/10/2020
(Q3 FY20) 91/119 64,635,282 710,278 11,500,000 17.79 126,374 24 Gateway Tower (San Jose) 03/10/2020
(Q3 FY20) 300/381 243,010,413 810,035 53,000,000 21.81 176,667 25 Alum Rock Multifamily (San Jose) 02/23/2021
(Q3 FY 21) 60/106 47,804,774 796,746 11,600,000 24.27 193,333 26 Dupont Family Apartments
(San Jose)
02/23/2021
(Q3 FY 21) 141/269 135,698,724 962,402 7,000,000 5.16 49,645 27 Sunol-West San Carlos (San Jose) 02/23/2021
(Q3 FY 21) 154/273 139,383,616 905,088 29,720,215 21.32 192,988 28 Tamien Station TOD (San Jose) 02/23/2021
(Q3 FY 21) 135/240 100,867,325 747,165 25,000,000 24.79 185,185 29 The Charles (San Jose) 02/23/2021
(Q3 FY 21) 99/177 78,729,074 795,243 12,480,000 15.85 126,061 30 Royal Oak Village (Morgan Hill) 08/31/2021
(Q1 FY22) 73/169 49,438,333 677,237 9,891,000 20.01 135,493 Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 17 of 45
Development and Renovation Projects’ Financial Data as of June 30, 2022 (unaudited)
# Project Name (City)
Program
Commitment
Date
No. of
Units/
Bedrooms
Estimated Total
Development
Cost a
Estimated
Total Cost
Per Unit
Committed
Program
Funding
To-Date
Program
Commitment
as % of Total
Estimated
Cost
Program's
Estimated
Cost Share
Per Unit
31 McEvoy Apartments (San Jose) 02/08/2022
(Q3 FY22) 224/224 134,939,435 602,408 23,500,000 17.42 104,911 32 Orchard Gardens (Sunnyvale)
02/08/2022
(Q3 FY22) 93/116 107,210,734 1,152,804 13,850,000 12.92 148,925 33 Bellarmino Place (San Jose)
02/08/2022
(Q3 FY22) 116/204 96,736,665 833,937 5,750,000 5.94 49,569 34 Hawthorn Senior Apartments
(San Jose)
02/08/2022
(Q3 FY22) 103/108 76,107,250 738,905 15,550,000 20.43 150,971 35 Lot 12 (Mountain View)
02/08/2022
(Q3 FY22) 120/211 115,683,548 964,030 9,750,000 8.43 81,250 36 Alvarado Park (San Jose)
06/28/2022
(Q4 FY22) 90/97 70,391,207 782,125 4,600,000 6.53 51,111 37 The Magnolias (Morgan Hill)
06/28/2022
(Q4 FY22) 66/117 64,368,522 975,281 13,200,000 20.51 200,000 38 Sonora Court (Sunnyvale)
06/28/2022
(Q4 FY22) 176/311 144,652,410 821,889 2,200,000 1.52 12,500 38 Development Projects Total 4,053 c /
5,568 $2,993,166,599 $526,902,961 17.60% $ 130,003
Renovation Projects
1 Markham I d (San Jose) 12/18/2018
(Q2 FY19) 153/155 26,809,742 175,227 7,000,000 26.11 45,752 2 Markham II d (San Jose) 12/18/2018
(Q2 FY19) 152/154 26,593,698 174,959 7,200,000 27.07 47,368 3 Curtner Studios d (San Jose) 12/18/2018
(Q2 FY19) 179/179 14,995,679 83,775 14,950,000 99.70 83,520 Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 18 of 45
Development and Renovation Projects’ Financial Data as of June 30, 2022 (unaudited)
# Project Name (City)
Program
Commitment
Date
No. of
Units/
Bedrooms
Estimated Total
Development
Cost a
Estimated
Total Cost
Per Unit
Committed
Program
Funding
To-Date
Program
Commitment
as % of Total
Estimated
Cost
Program's
Estimated
Cost Share
Per Unit
4 Hillview Court e (Milpitas) 10/06/2020
(Q2 FY21) 134/134 80,300,000 599,254 21,900,000 27.27 163,433 5 Casa de Novo f (San Jose) 12/08/2020
(Q2 FY21) TBD TBD TBD 4,366,667 32.83 TBD
6 Residence Inn (San Jose)
02/08/2022
(Q3 FY22) 102/201 87,340,000 856,275 1,000,000 1.14 9,804 6 Renovation Projects Total 720 c / 823 $ 249,339,119 $ 56,416,667 22.63% $ 78,356 44 Total Development and Renovation Projects 4,773c /
6,391 $3,242,505,718 $ 583,319,628 17.99% $ 122,212 d
Source: Data provided by the Office of Supportive Housing. * TBD = To be determined.
a The estimated total development costs include items such as common lounges, community kitchens, fitness rooms, and laundry facilities, in addition to the costs necessary to build the respective projects. b Program is in the process of acquiring the real property as included in the original Program commitment. The Program would own the land and ground lease for the development of affordable housing. c The number of units includes units dedicated for a property manager for each development (59 property manager units in total) and 270 existing renovation units (see footnote d). d The number of units for each project includes pre-existing units that were inherited with Markham I (102 units), Markham II (101 units), and Curtner Studios (67 units). It is important to note that while only a portion of these renovated units will contribute to Program Housing Goals, the Estimated Total Development Cost and the Estimated Total Cost Per Unit incorporate costs for the renovation of other affordable housing units in these structures not specified in the Measure A Program. The Program's Estimated Cost Share Per Unit excludes the 270 existing units as the Program’s Committed Funding is not financing the renovation of those units. e The County acquired property that is currently developed with a 146-room hotel. The intent of the Program acquiring the property is to convert to a 132 unit permanent supportive housing (PSH) development with approximately 6,000 square feet of community space and outdoor space of over 10,000 square feet including a community garden, sports court, barbecue and seating area, dog park and pet wash area. The developers received a $25 million bridge loan from the County, which is to be repaid and is not included in the Committed Program Funding. f The County acquired property that is currently developed with a 54-room motel. The intent of the Program acquiring the property is to operate the 54 units as permanent supportive housing and interim housing until approximately July 2022, when the buildings would be demolished and the site redeveloped as affordable housing.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 19 of 45

2.2 – Program Expenditures per Housing Project
Of the $583.32 million committed to the 44 development and renovation projects, $354.16 million, or approximately 60.71 percent, was expended as of June 30, 2022. During the fourth quarter of FY 2021-22, the Program expended $41.77 million, which represented an increase in cumulative expenditures of 13.37 percent when compared to the $312.39 million spent as of March 31, 2021. Exhibit 3 below and on the following pages provides an overview by project of the expenditures to-date (as of June 30, 2022) by cost category (acquisition, pre-development, construction and permanent financing3
) expended from Measure A funds.

Exhibit 34
Program Expenditures per Housing Project
through June 30, 2022
# Project Name
Total Program
Funds
Committed
To-Date
Total
Program
Funds
Expended
Program
Funds
Expended
During Q4
Program to-date Expenditures
Acquisition PreDevelopment Construction Permanent
Financing
Development Projects
1 Gateway Senior Apartments $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 0 $ 3,600,000 $ 0 $ 3,900,000 $ 0 2 Crossings on Monterey 5,800,000 5,800,000 0 2,400,000 1,179,946 2,220,054 0 3 Leigh Ave Senior Apartments 13,500,000 13,500,000 2,754,038 3,700,000 49,723 9,750,277 0 4 Villas on the Park 7,200,000 7,199,999 0 0 1,644,502 5,555,497 0 5 The Veranda 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 68,564 151,434 780,002 0 6 Quetzal Gardens 9,830,000 9,830,000 0 3,900,000 284,522 5,645,477 0 7 Sango Court 16,000,000 15,004,602 5,604,602 6,900,000 2,500,000 5,604,602 0 8 Iamesi Village (formerly North
San Pedro Apartments) 10,327,100 9,530,901 0 93,633 0 9,437,268 0

3 Permanent expenditures occur when a project is completed and the Program uses committed funds to payment to decrease the construction loan. 4 Project names colored grey indicate projects completed.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 20 of 45
Program Expenditures per Housing Project
through June 30, 2022
# Project Name
Total Program
Funds
Committed
To-Date
Total
Program
Funds
Expended
Program
Funds
Expended
During Q4
Program to-date Expenditures
Acquisition PreDevelopment Construction Permanent
Financing
9 Calabazas (formerly Corvin)
Apartments 29,000,000 29,000,000 0 9,500,000 2,000,000 17,500,000 0 10 Page Street Apartments 14,000,000 12,652,812 0 4,186,089 1,053,911 7,412,812 0 11 Agrihood Senior Apartments 23,550,000 23,550,000 0 0 2,000,000 21,550,000 0 12 Mariposa Place (formerly West
San Carlos Housing) 9,300,000 9,300,000 0 5,500,000 1,328,000 2,472,000 0 13 Blossom Hill Housing 19,100,000 19,100,000 0 9,000,000 2,000,000 8,100,000 0 14 Vela Apartments (formerly Alum
Rock Family Housing) 15,650,000 8,596,833 0 3,700,000 2,000,000 2,896,833 0 15 Roosevelt Park 14,400,000 8,515,300 2,081,703 4,000,000 2,500,000 2,015,300 0 16 Auzerais Apartments 13,200,000 13,200,000 0 12,500,000 0 700,000 0 17 Gallup & Mesa 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 0 0 2,600,000 0 18 Villas at 4th St. (formerly 4th and
E. Younger Apartments) 7,500,000 7,500,000 0 6,798,000 0 702,000 0 19 Immanuel-Sobrato (formerly
Moorpark) Apartments 16,654,646 8,255,079 4,779,774 0 8,255,079 0 20 Vitalia (formerly Bascom
Apartments) 15,800,000 10,754,658 4,285,714 5,450,000 0 5,304,658 0 21 Kifer Senior Apartments 7,400,000 6,840,000 1,197,072 4,700,000 2,140,000 0 0 22 La Avenida Apartments 19,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 Algarve Apartments 11,500,000 5,995,000 0 3,495,000 2,500,000 0 0 Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 21 of 45
Program Expenditures per Housing Project
through June 30, 2022
# Project Name
Total Program
Funds
Committed
To-Date
Total
Program
Funds
Expended
Program
Funds
Expended
During Q4
Program to-date Expenditures
Acquisition PreDevelopment Construction Permanent
Financing
24 Gateway Tower 53,000,000 18,170,000 18,170,000 18,170,000 0 0 0 25 Alum Rock Multifamily 11,600,000 10,590,317 233,976 3,000,000 1,732,150 5,858,167 0 26 Dupont Family Apartments 7,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 Sunol-West San Carlos 29,720,215 12,518,182 287,860 11,200,000 1,318,182 0 0 28 Tamien Station TOD 25,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
29 The Charles 12,480,000 4,641,520 0 3,200,000 1,441,520 0 0 30 Royal Oak Village 9,891,000 4,274,000 (1,106,348) 3,307,000 967,000 0 0 31 McEvoy Apartments 23,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
32 Orchard Gardens 13,850,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
33 Bellarmino Place 5,750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
34 Hawthorn Senior Apartments 15,550,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
35 Lot 12 9,750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
36 Alvarado Park 4,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
37 The Magnolias 13,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
38 Sonora Court 2,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
Development Projects Total $526,902,961 $285,419,202 $40,888,391 $128,368,286 $28,790,890 $128,260,026 $0 Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Annual and Fourth Quarter Report for FY 2021-22 MGO Advisory Page 22 of 45
Program Expenditures per Housing Project
through June 30, 2022
# Project Name
Total Program
Funds
Committed
To-Date
Total
Program
Funds
Expended
Program
Funds
Expended
During Q4
Program to-date Expenditures
Acquisition PreDevelopment Construction Permanent
Financing
Renovation Projects
1 Markham I $7,000,000 $5,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,700,000 2 Markham II 7,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Curtner Studios 14,950,000 13,036,104 0 0 0 13,036,104 0 4 Hillview Court 21,900,000 45,636,368 a 881,934 45,636,368 a - - 0 5 Casa de Novo 4,366,667 4,366,667 0 4,366,667 - - 0
6 Residence Inn 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
Renovation Projects Total 56,416,667 68,739,139 881,934 50,003,035 0 13,036,104 5,700,000 Total Development and Renovation
Projects $583,319,628 $354,158,341 $41,770,325 $178,371,321 $28,790,890 $141,296,130 $5,700,000 Source: Data provided by the Office of Supportive Housing. a The developers for Hillview Court received a bridge loan of $25 million from the Program that is to be repaid to the Program. The bridge loan amount is included in the expenditures, but is not included in the Total Program Funds Committed.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
County of Santa Clara Measure A 2016 Affordable Housing Bond Program Independent Advisor’s Quarterly Report – Second Quarter FY 2021 - 2022 MGO Advisory

Page 23 of 45 ends

Joint Meeting for the Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the WholeJanuary 11, 2023

Joint Meeting for the Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole
January 11, 2023