Some people who received this message don't often get email from . Learn why this is important
[External Email]
FW: Vision Zero Action Plan
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 2/13/2023 7:43 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: Rachel Sussman
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2023 5:42 PM
To: Davis, Dev <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>; Mahan, Ma <Ma [email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Foley, Pam <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Torres, Omar <[email protected]>; Or z, Peter <Peter.Or [email protected]>; Batra, Arjun <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; [email protected]; shiloh Subject: Vision Zero Ac on Plan
Dear Councilmember Davis,
I am the mother of three children who attend elementary and middle school at Trace and Hoover in San Jose. All three of them bike to school every day from our home just off the Alameda. I often worry about their safety because the streets near our schools are not designed to keep kids safe from inattentive or speeding drivers.
I am part of a parent group at Trace Elementary (https://www.tracepto.com/walk-n-roll/) who wants to get more kids to walk and bike to school. We have been working with the county and the city to try to get safety measures put into place around the school, including bike lanes, better crosswalk markings, and a stop sign near a busy school crosswalk. Despite a great deal of work from our parents and buy- in from our community and school administration, we have not been able to get the city to make the changes we need to keep our kids safe.
We saw too many deaths of pedestrians and bicyclists this year in San Jose, perhaps most tragically the death of a third-grader who was in a crosswalk near his school when he was struck by an SUV. I do not want to see any more children die for lack of good street design.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
I am also a primary care doctor who works for the county and Stanford at a hospital and clinic near my home, and I bike to work every day. I am scrupulous about following traffic laws, wearing high visibility clothing and helmet, and using front, rear, and side lights and reflectors. Nevertheless, I have close calls with cars on a regular basis. I don’t blame the drivers. I blame the roads which are not built to keep me safe.
I wish I could convince more of my patients, colleagues, and friends to get active by riding their bikes to get to work, shops, and school, but most of them are too scared by the unsafe roads to take the leap.
I will continue to bike for my health, for my community connection, and for the planet. I want the streets to be designed more safely so that more people can make that choice
I support the recommendations from the Mayor’s Transition Committee on Community Safety to:
- Fully fund the Vision Zero Action Plan and to ensure project delivery happens at a faster pace
- Fund new staff in the Department of Transportation and keep staffing levels so that we have enough capacity to oversee project delivery and write new grants to bring more money to the City
- Fund the Bike Plan and do so quickly!!
- And adopt a pedestrian safety improvement program
Thank you for your dedication to the City of San Jose. Please prioritize the safety of our streets for all users.
Sincerely,
Rachel Sussman, MD
San Jose Resident
Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
FW: Road Safety For Cycling
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 2/13/2023 7:43 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: Greg Colton
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2023 2:49 PM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>; Mahan, Ma <Ma [email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Foley, Pam <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Torres, Omar <[email protected]>; Davis, Dev <[email protected]>; Or z, Peter <Peter.Or [email protected]>; Batra, Arjun <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: sandhya laddha
Subject: Road Safety For Cycling
Mayor et al;
I moved to San Jose four years ago, having lived all over the world. My family of five all cycle and very much appreciate the investment that has been made in road safety since we moved here. I was recently hit by a car, thankfully without incident in an area lacking improvement. We subscribe to the Merc and use it to keep track of where there are traffic fatalities related to cyclists so we can educate our family about the risks each week. I look forward to not having to do that someday. I support the recommendations from the Mayor’s Transition Committee on Community Safety to fund the City’s Vision Zero Action Plan, the Bike Plan, a pedestrian program and an increase in staff in the Department of Transportation.
Thank you.
Regards, Greg Colton
FW: Street Safety
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 2/13/2023 7:43 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
-----Original Message-----
From: Cody Seal
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2023 9:40 PM
To: Cohen, David <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; City Clerk <[email protected]>; sandhya laddha < >; Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Torres, Omar <[email protected]>; Davis, Dev <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; Batra, Arjun <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]> Subject: Street Safety
[You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
[External Email]
Hello Counilman Cohen,
I’m writing to you to express my support for improved street safety in San Jose.
I live here in District 4 with my wife and three young children - my oldest is a kindergartener at Orchard School, and we’re fortunate to live within walking distance of the school.
I also work here in the district, and I bike to the office almost every weekday. It’s a great way to start and end the work day! I’m grateful to have nice bike lanes for my entire commute route, but there are some areas that could be safer like the section of Brokaw Rd around the 880 ramps. In fact, I saw a cyclist struck by a car merging into the on-ramp turn lane just over two weeks ago on my ride home.
I support the Mayor’s Transition Committee on Community Safety to fund the Vision Zero Action Plan, the Bike Plan, a pedestrian program to end senseless deaths like that of 8 year old Jacob Villanueva, and increased staffing in the Department of Transportation.
I also support increased traffic enforcement to hold dangerous drivers accountable and deter the
practice while our streets safety plans are in work.
Thanks for your time,
Cody Seal
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
[External Email]
FW: 23-257 - Homelessness Committee Report
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 2/13/2023 7:44 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: Kathryn Hedges
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2023 10:45 PM
To: The Office of Mayor Ma Mahan <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; District2 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; [email protected]; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject:
23-257 - Homelessness Commi ee Report
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Today I am speaking on my own behalf and not that of any community organiza ons.
I agree with the goal in the report that we should be concerned about keeping unhoused people who receive housing from returning to the streets. However, the current "housing reten on" sta s cs are inflated because Abode Services has chosen to strong-arm the management (MidPen Housing and MidPen Services) into retaining tenants who either need more supports (that Abode won't provide) or need to live in a different environment.
I live in District 3 at Donner Lo s. I'm not "in a program" and my rent is indexed to the Area Median Income, so I believe that means I'm in "workforce housing." When I put my name in their housing lo ery in 2015, and when I was picked in 2016, I thought it was a great idea to create a community with a diversity of tenants instead of segrega ng by class or income. People in "essen al jobs" who can't afford market rate housing, re red/disabled people, and people who had been unhoused could live together. Great idea, unsa sfactory implementa on.
Tenants who are unable to care for themselves independently should receive In Home Support services but they don't always receive those services. We have had fires in the building when Housing First tenants who can't safely use a stove try to cook.
One Housing First tenant's cataract surgery was delayed over a year because his case managers kept canceling his appointments at Stanford Eye Center because they were qui ng their jobs without no ce. He was nearly evicted for issues from his vision impairment during that year; luckily, Abode got him help from the Law Founda on.
A Housing First tenant, who was sensi ve to noise, pulled a knife on the building's janitor for making too much noise mopping. He yelled abuse and threats at me every me he could hear me in the hallway, which made me afraid to leave my apartment. I don't know if he needs supervision, treatment, or a different environment--but now he lives on the street again.
The Housing First tenant whose guest was shot by police on Memorial Day in 2017 had a history of explosive behavior towards others while using methamphetamine. I saw him flip furniture at community events twice. He was doing meth with a friend when he set his apartment on fire a er arguing with Security about a noise complaint. His apartment was full of garbage he had taken home from dumpsters.
His friend with the axe had already assaulted someone in the elevator. When SJPD held a mee ng to jus fy the shoo ng, they were surprised to hear that tenants were so afraid of the man that they were relieved to hear he'd been shot to death. Anyway, I don't know if the Housing First arsonist is s ll in jail or has been released to homelessness again.
According to the tenant grapevine, we have had 20-25 deaths in or next to the building since 2016. (A tenant was killed in the crossfire of a drug deal gone bad outside the building a few years ago.) We have visits nearly every day from SJPD, SJFD, and County EMS. Most of these are for Housing First tenants or their guests. A Housing First tenant ended his life a er MidPen raised his rent shortly a er he lost his job, his girlfriend dumped him, and his dog died. Another one of their tenants (he might have been a former foster youth) OD'd and died at a party here a er some other tenants talked him into trying a drug he wasn't accustomed to using. When he passed out, his "friends" all abandoned him without calling 911.
Instead of helping Housing First tenants get detox services, Abode Services protects them from evic on for selling drugs in the building to support their habits, or from evic on for meth-related aggression. We have a constant parade of people looking to buy drugs. Besides harassing residents trying to go home in peace, they also vandalize the building, urinate in the stairwells, create disturbances, smoke in the stairwells, steal laundry, and break into apartments. When I return home on foot, I have to block unwanted visitors from tailga ng behind me or grabbing the door--and I will get a lease viola on if they succeed. Yet the tenants who sell drugs to them, or invite them over to "party," are protected from consequences. Abode demands that MidPen retain their tenants to keep up their KPI of "reten on in housing."
Donner Lo s lives up to all the nega ve stereotypes of affordable housing in a neighborhood and Abode Services is a big part of that. This mismanaged building is fueling NIMBY arguments about affordable housing. We have 10-20 Housing First tenants out of 100 tenant units, but their drug sales and erra c behavior completely change the character of the building. (Five of them live on my floor and used to have floa ng trap house ac vity at their apartments.) The rest of the tenants reject them for this behavior, so we don't have a unified community. There are always people hanging around outside and causing problems.
The Federal rules for Housing First state clearly that tenants in the program not only benefit from the same rights as other tenants, they have the same responsibili es so that the community will func on harmoniously.
Because Abode focuses on op mizing their housing reten on stats, their tenants in MidPen Housing proper es are not held to the same standards as tenants who aren't "in a program." Other tenants are red of pu ng up with the constant nuisances and ge ng lease viola ons for trivia. Most of the "workforce housing" tenants who leave Donner Lo s a er their lease is up are displaced from San Jose because they find comparable rent in Morgan Hill, Gilroy, Portland, etc. This would seem to violate the spirit of the City's An -Displacement campaign.
Also, I hope Abode Services is paying for the restora on and reconstruc on from the fires and floods their tenants have been causing. I don't need to pay higher rent because someone broke a fire sprinkler while they were high and flooded mul ple apartments. I also suspect they are the ones who keep tampering with the smoke detectors and causing false alarms. I'm red of having to evacuate for a false fire alarm at least once a week, some mes in the middle of the night.
I have heard on social media that Abode failed to pay their share of rent on behalf of some of their tenants at other buildings. The tenants couldn't cover the whole rent payment and were evicted. It seems like paying their share of the rent is the very minimum bar for supports. h ps://nextdoor.com/p/4C7H7C79RKsf?utm source=share&extras=MTY4NjIyMzg%3D
Please inves gate the details of Abode Services' actual performance, not just the KPIs. I know our Housing Department is busy with a lot of very good work, but perhaps a County Civil Grand Jury could look into their performance.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Kind regards,
Kathryn Hedges
San Jose, CA 95112
[External Email]
FW: 23-257 - Homelessness Committee Report
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 2/13/2023 7:44 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: Kathryn Hedges
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2023 11:52 PM
To: The Office of Mayor Ma Mahan <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; District2 <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District5 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Webmaster Manager <[email protected]> Cc: shhaccoreteam >
Subject: 23-257 - Homelessness Commi ee Report
Dear Mayor, Vice-Mayor, Council Members, and Homelessness Commi ee Members:
I am a member of the Sacred Heart Housing Advocacy Commi ee, and we are currently advoca ng for Tenant Right to Counsel in evic on cases. This is not SHHAC's official response, but it's in accordance with views we have discussed in the group.
Thank you for including Recommenda on #2 for Tenant Right to Counsel and/or collabora ve court proceedings in this report.
The Bay Area News Group just reported on evic on sta s cs across Bay Area coun es. Although the ar cle focused on the dire situa on in Contra Costa County, it was contrasted with the be er outcomes in Santa Clara County. The County and San Jose fund at least some support for tenants. Expanding these efforts would reduce the number of people falling into homelessness, which our own Housing Department says is at least double the rate at which we can rehouse people.
h ps://enewspaper.mercurynews.com/infinity/ar cle popover share.aspx?guid=0ec08ef0-9c1a-4150-991c- dbcc8b99a47e
Randolph’s case is one in a surge of more than 10,000 eviction lawsuits filed across the core five- county Bay Area since the fall of 2021, when state and local pandemic eviction protections started to wind down, according to a Bay Area News Group analysis of court data.
While court data affirms advocates’ warnings of an “eviction tsunami” in areas where protections lapsed, it also reflects the disparities in resources available to the growing numbers of tenants
facing eviction across the Bay Area. Only some have access to rental aid and legal representation, leaving many to navigate the often intimidating eviction process on their own.
Contra Costa County “does not have the same level of protections or tenant resources” as other parts of the region, said Alex Werth, policy and research director with the nonprofit East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy. “The results of this disparity are really borne out in the data.” Over the second half of 2022 — after most emergency protections had fully expired — eviction filings soared 43% above pre-pandemic levels in Contra Costa, Santa Clara and San Mateo counties combined, according to court data. Despite the distribution of a half-billion aid dollars to struggling renters across those counties, advocates expect eviction cases to remain high in the months ahead.
Meanwhile, in San Francisco, where a narrow eviction protection ordinance has been in effect since July, cases rose to pre-COVID-19 numbers.
The exception was Alameda County, where strict limits on evictions dating back to March 2020 are keeping cases at historic lows. Multiple landlord groups have sued to end those protections, arguing they are no longer needed since the worst of the pandemic is over and most people have returned to work. Officials have said the safeguards could end April 30.
Last year, Contra Costa County had the highest eviction case rate in the core Bay Area, with one filing for every 116 households, according to court data. Next came San Francisco, with one for every 171 households; Santa Clara, with one for every 195 households; San Mateo, with one for every 210 households; and Alameda, with just one for every 616 households.
Between May and October, advocates with the East Bay Alliance attended and tracked 56 eviction proceedings in Contra Costa County Superior Court. They found that 86% of landlords came to court with an attorney, while only 7% of tenants had legal representation. As a result, renters lost cases they might otherwise have won had they had access to “high-quality and timely legal services,” according to a report summarizing the findings.
To shift the power imbalance between landlords and tenants, the report recommends creating a program to offer all renters facing eviction a lawyer, similar to an effort San Francisco started in 2019. Unlike in criminal cases, defendants in eviction suits have no right to counsel.
A city report on San Francisco’s program — one of the few anywhere in the country — found that during the first half of 2019, over two-thirds of households with an attorney were able to stay in their homes, compared to just 38% of households without representation.
Even though Santa Clara County doesn’t have its own eviction defense program, Todd Rothbard, a landlord attorney, said he’s seen few renters there actually forced out of their units in recent months, even as eviction cases have spiked. That’s because local government agencies and nonprofits have been stepping in to cover tenants’ unpaid rent at eviction proceedings, he said.
Housing people who have fallen into homelessness is far more difficult and expensive for our social safety net and far more trauma c than not losing one's home in the first place. Children suffer despite having no role in whatever led to the evic on.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Contrary to public statements by our Mayor, substance abuse and mental health issues are not the only reasons people are unhoused. It is true that the most visible unhoused people suffer from those issues--which make them less able to live inconspicuously and more likely to depend on panhandling in public than most unhoused people are. Most people who lose their housing are currently employed, have recently lost a job but are employable, or their disability just makes them unable to earn 3X market rents (not unable to func on in housing). I'm sure that long COVID is playing a part in disability-related loss of income. Some people who lose their homes s ll maintain their employment, par cularly if they can couch-surf instead of living outdoors, or have a movable vehicle instead of a tent. Why not give them a second chance in their current rental?
Blaming homelessness on people's behavioral health problems is o en reversing cause and effect. Many people develop substance abuse issues trying to cope with life without housing, while others develop mental health issues from the trauma, or can no longer manage problems they could treat while housed and insured. This is why it's important to prevent people from losing their homes in the first place, to avoid trauma that can trigger a downward spiral into problems that are hard to treat.
Please adopt Recommenda on #2.
Sincerely,
Kathryn Hedges
San Jose, CA 95112
[External Email]
SJ Vision Zero Plan
Teodoro Cipresso
Mon 2/13/2023 12:00 AM
To:Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>;City Clerk <[email protected]>;Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>;Foley, Pam <[email protected]>;Cohen, David <[email protected]>;Torres, Omar <[email protected]>;Davis, Dev <[email protected]>;Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>;Batra, Arjun <[email protected]>;Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>;Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>;Doan, Bien <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>
Some people who received this message don't often get email from . Learn why this is important
Dear Sergio Jimenez,
I live in a neighborhood across from the Capitol and Branham light rail stations, along the Canoas Creek. I use my bike during the week to commute to work and to exercise on the weekends. I discovered cycling during the pandemic and we have since become a one car family. I work on Bailey Ave in south San Jose and it's about a 25 mile round trip to work. I take Santa Teresa Blvd all the way to Bailey and would not attempt to commute by bike if there weren't bike lanes.
Bike lanes are great, but paint is not protection. Last year I was hit from behind in the bike lane at Santa Teresa and Dunn by a car that did not stop before turning right on red. I was shaken and sore for a while, but decided to continue commuting by bike (after buying a new one) in hopes that lightning doesn't strike twice in the same spot. From the vantage point of a bike, I can see how distracted and impatient drivers are on our roads. People are busy, I understand that, but our streets should be designed in such a way that drivers are encouraged to slow down and watch for pedestrians and cyclists.
This past year, San Jose had a record number of traffic fatalities. Additionally, the amount of time and resources spent on the average of 20 crashes a day, 10 of which involve a major injury, is a complete waste of time for our first responders and police officers, not to mention the costs borne by crash victims in the form of auto-repair, medical insurance, the trauma and time taken.
All of this is a waste of time and money and we have the solutions in the form of street design.
I support the recommendations from the Mayor’s Transition Committee on Community Safety to:
- Fully fund the Vision Zero Action Plan and to ensure project delivery happens at a faster pace - Fund new staff in the Department of Transportation and keep staffing levels so that we have enough capacity to oversee project delivery and write new grants to bring more money to the City - Fund the Bike Plan and do so quick
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. - And adopt a pedestrian safety improvement program
Thank you for your dedication to the City of San Jose. Please prioritize the safety of our streets for all users.
Sincerely,
Teodoro Cipresso
Some people who received this message don't often get email from . Learn why this is important
[External Email]
FW: SJ Vison Zero Plan
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 2/13/2023 11:31 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: John Hovland
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 11:28 AM
To: Davis, Dev <[email protected]>
Cc: Mahan, Ma <Ma [email protected]>; [email protected]; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Foley, Pam <[email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Torres, Omar <[email protected]>; Or z, Peter <Peter.Or [email protected]>; Batra, Arjun <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; shiloh Subject: SJ Vison Zero Plan
Dear Councilmember Davis,
We live in Georgetown adjacent to Cahill Park near Diridon Sta on. I bicycle for recrea on/fitness/happiness, and when prac cal for errands. I appreciate the efforts that the City has made to make streets safer for cyclists and pedestrians, but more needs to be done. As you know, too many fatali es and major injuries are s ll occurring in our City. Too many motorists are not safely sharing the road with cyclists and pedestrians. Solu ons in the form of street design are available.
We support the recommenda ons from the Mayor’s Transi on Commi ee on Community Safety to:
Fully fund the Vision Zero Ac on Plan and to ensure that project delivery happens at a faster pace Fund new staff in the Department of Transporta on to provide capacity to oversee project delivery and to write new grants to bring more funding to the City
Fund the Bike Plan and to do so quickly
Adopt a pedestrian safety improvement program
Thank you for con nuing to help make San Jose a great place to live. Please make our streets safer for all.
Sincerely,
John Hovland
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Some people who received this message don't often get email from . Learn why this is important
[External Email]
FW: SJ VZ Plan
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Mon 2/13/2023 9:22 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: Chris na Salva er <
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 9:15 AM
To: Torres, Omar <[email protected]>
Cc: shiloh City Clerk <[email protected]>; Mahan, Ma <Ma [email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Foley, Pam <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Davis, Dev <[email protected]>; Or z, Peter <Peter.Or [email protected]>; Batra, Arjun <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: SJ VZ Plan
Dear Councilmember Torres,
I live in DTSJ and ride my bike because it’s good for me and my community. Sadly, all too often, I fear riding my bicycle because car drivers have become less and less attentive. I am writing to you today because street safety should be a top City priority.
This past year, San Jose had a record number of traffic fatalities. Additionally, the amount of time and resources spent on the average of 20 crashes a day, 10 of which involve a major injury, is a complete waste of time for our first responders and police officers, not to mention the costs borne by crash victims in the form of auto-repair, medical insurance, the trauma and time taken.
All of this is a waste of time and money and we have the solutions in the form of street design.
We support the recommendations from the Mayor’s Transition Committee on Community Safety to:
- Fully fund the Vision Zero Action Plan and to ensure project delivery happens at a faster pace
- Fund new staff in the Department of Transportation and keep staffing levels so that we have enough capacity to oversee project delivery and write new grants to bring more money to the City
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. - Fund the Bike Plan and do so quick
- And adopt a pedestrian safety improvement program
Thank you for your dedication to the City of San Jose. Please prioritize the safety of our streets for all users.
Sincerely,
Chris na M. Salva er
2/13/23, 3:42 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQA… 1/2 [External Email]
23-257 - Community Safety Committee Report
Kathryn Hedges <
Mon 2/13/2023 2:26 PM
To:The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>;District3 <[email protected]>;District1 <[email protected]>;District2 <[email protected]>;District4 <[email protected]>;District5 <[email protected]>;District 6 <[email protected]>;District7 <[email protected]>;District8 <[email protected]>;District9 <[email protected]>;District 10 <[email protected]>;City Clerk <[email protected]>;City Clerk <[email protected]>;Webmaster Manager <[email protected]> Cc: Jen Myhre < Kylie Clark < Christopher Logan
< Derrick Sanderlin <
Dear Mayor, Vice Mayor, Councilmembers, and Committee Members:
I am a Downtown resident in District 3, and a member of SURJ, RECS, and SHHAC at Sacred Heart. I am also a tenant in affordable housing with a front-row seat to the issues described in this report, and a different perspective from the members of this committee.
FY 2022-23
Recommendation #1: The community engagement strategy needs to take into account the previous work of ReImagining Public Safety (RIPS). After the widespread trauma inflicted on residents of San Jose, particularly the BIPOC communities, "community engagement" won't be effective unless the police force and its academy training change dramatically. The "military bootcamp" training methods used in the USA produce officers who see every encounter as a life-or-death threat from an enemy rather than a situation they can de-escalate with appropriate techniques they don't learn in the academy here. We see no evidence these changes will happen. Also, the success metrics should come from an outside observer, not the police department: perhaps RIPS or the IPA.
Recommendation #2: We heartily endorse the expansion of programs, such as TRUST, that allow substance use and mental health issues to be handled by experts and peer supporters in those fields. (Domestic violence and child/youth issues should also be handled by appropriate non-police experts and peer supporters.) We recommend establishing at least one more TRUST team for the City of San Jose, as half the population of Santa Clara County live in San Jose and one team is not adequate for this population across a wide area. We also demand a direct public telephone number for TRUST so that people in crisis don't have to navigate a complex phone tree to maybe get an operator who will connect them to TRUST instead of calling 911 to send an armed officer.
Recommendation #3: We do not endorse an increase in police officers. Instead, we refer to the RIPS recommendations to delegate types of calls that are not effective use of police resources to experts in those areas (mental health, substance abuse, homelessness, domestic violence, etc.)
2/13/23, 3:42 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQA… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Recommendation #4: Self-enforcing streets that reduce opportunities for reckless driving without police presence are a good idea. I attended Councilmember Torres's event this Saturday and approve of these plans.
FY 24+
Recommendation #1: Making San Jose a safer place to walk and bike is an excellent goal, and adding staff to improve grant funding is a good idea. I don't bike as much as I used to because I feel unsafe from aggressive and inattentive drivers, as well as hostile pedestrians and reckless scooter/bike riders.
The underinvested areas of San Jose are not safe for pedestrians just in terms of basic infrastructure, and this needs to be improved as an equity issue. Throughout the city, we need to make it easy to do the right thing for the climate and reduce reliance on cars.
Recommendation #2: People in some neighborhoods feel safer with more police presence, but please take into account that other neighborhoods have been traumatized by police. "Friendlier" police are still police until they have some assurance that they will not be harassed.
Recommendation #3: Delegating appropriate calls to CSOs is an excellent idea. Please ensure that CSOs are screened to prevent bias against BIPOC residents, women, LGBTQ+, disabled residents, or other disadvantaged/underrepresented communities.
Recommendation #4: We disagree with the recommendation to increase sworn staffing levels unless this is absolutely necessary after reallocating as many types of calls to CSOs and experts in substance use, mental health, homelessness, domestic violence, child/youth issues, etc. (We do not need sworn police officers assigned to schools; they create more issues than they solve or prevent.) I don't know anyone who thought it was appropriate for this committee to meet in secret and compile these recommendations without public input or comment. I will attend the meeting via Zoom if at all possible, but my comments in this email are too long for 30-120 seconds of public comment in any case.
Sincerely,
Kathryn Hedges
2/13/23, 3:45 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQA… 1/2 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
San Jose Vision Zero for Safer streets
Ranjith Aramanai <
Mon 2/13/2023 2:40 PM
To:District 10 <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>;Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>;Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>;Foley, Pam <[email protected]>;Cohen, David <[email protected]>;Torres, Omar <[email protected]>;Davis, Dev <[email protected]>;Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>;Batra, Arjun <[email protected]>;Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>;Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>;
Doan, Bien <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;sandhya laddha <
Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Dear Arjun,
I am a resident of south San Jose and live near the intersection of Snell and Santa Teresa. I walk or ride my bicycle to close by places because it feels great for my physical and mental health. It also means one less car on the road.
In this year alone there have been quite a lot of accidents in my area and I notice these things not through the news but seeing everyday people who are in a hurry, not wanting to stop for pedestrians, not noticing pedestrians because shrubs or cars blocking the view. I feel we can take simple steps to reduce traffic accidents from solutions in better street designs.
We support the recommendations from the Mayor’s Transition Committee on Community Safety to:
- Fully fund the Vision Zero Action Plan and to ensure project delivery happens at a faster pace
- Fund new staff in the Department of Transportation and keep staffing levels so that we have enough capacity to oversee project delivery and write new grants to bring more money to the City
- Fund the Bike Plan and do so quick
- And adopt a pedestrian safety improvement program
Thank you for your dedication to the City of San Jose. Please prioritize the safety of our streets for all users.
Sincerely,
Ranjith Aramanai
2/13/23, 3:46 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQA… 1/2 [External Email]
Support a budget that creates a San José for ALL!
Elizabeth Barcelos <
Mon 2/13/2023 2:59 PM
To:City Clerk <[email protected]>
2/13/23, 3:46 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQA… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
San Jose City Clerk Toni Taber,
As a San José resident, I am writing to ask for your support in shaping a City Budget that prioritizes the needs of working families and upholds our values as a community. In order to properly address economic, racial, and social inequality, we need a budget that ensures we are building a City for every resident, family, and neighborhood.
I am joining together with my community to ask you to prioritize the following in the City Budget:
Strengthening essential services
Building safe & strong neighborhoods
Providing homes and good jobs
Creating a healthy environment
Working towards childcare
Fighting for a city for ALL
San Jose remains deeply economically divided — nearly half of all children live in families which make too little money to make ends meet. This inequality is bad for working families, bad for our neighborhoods, and bad for San José’s regional economy.
That’s why I’m coming together with my San José neighbors to ask you to create a budget that will consider the urgent and emerging needs of all residents across the City, regardless of where we live, what we do for a living, and how much money we make.
Elizabeth Barcelos
2/13/23, 3:47 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQA… 1/2 [External Email]
Letter to City Council from REAL re Mayor's Transition Committees Claire Kennedy <
Mon 2/13/2023 3:10 PM
To:The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>;District1 <[email protected]>;District2 <[email protected]>;District3 <[email protected]>;District4 <[email protected]>;District5 <[email protected]>;District 6 <[email protected]>;District7 <[email protected]>;District8 <[email protected]>;District9 <[email protected]>;District 10 <[email protected]>;City Clerk <[email protected]> Cc: Reed, Jim <[email protected]>;Gomez, David <[email protected]>;Sandoval, Vanessa <[email protected]>;Arreola, Kiara <[email protected]>;Nguyen, Lam <[email protected]>;Madero, Angel <[email protected]>;Groen, Mary Anne <[email protected]>;Fleming, Jonathan <[email protected]>;Hughes, Scott <[email protected]>;Lomio, Michael <[email protected]>;Wilcox, Leland <[email protected]>;Hamilton, Peter <[email protected]>;Maguire, Jennifer <[email protected]>;Klein, Nanci <[email protected]>;Alan Gouig < Kyra Kazantzis < Yvonne Jimenez < City Clerk
<[email protected]>
1 attachments (166 KB)
Letter to CSJ from REAL re Mayor's Transition Committee 2023.02.13.pdf; Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Dear Honorable Mayor Mahan and Members of the City Council,
Please see a ached a le er prepared by the nonprofit Race Equity Ac on Leadership (REAL) Coali on regarding the Mayor’s Transi on Commi ees. We look forward to your discussion around this. Thank you for your considera on.
Regards,
Claire Kennedy
Claire Kennedy, MPA | Policy + Advocacy Fellow
Silicon Valley Council of Nonprofits
Web: svcn.org| Twi er: @SVCN
Pronouns: she/her/hers
Register for Ac vate Your Impact 2023!
2/13/23, 3:47 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQA… 2/2 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
February 13, 2023
Mayor & City Council
City of San José
200 East Santa Clara Street, 18th Floor
San José, CA 95113
Sent via electronic mail
Re: Mayor’s Transition Committees
Dear Mayor Mahan and City Council:
This letter was prepared by members of the Race Equity Action Leadership (REAL) coalition.
Background
REAL’s Budget Justice Workgroup sent a letter to the Mayor and Council on February 1, 2023, expressing disappointment with the lack of transparency in the Mayor’s Transition Committee process, as well as the failure of the Mayor’s stated priorities and the committee charters to address important strategies and ongoing work, especially those that would further racial justice and equity. (Attached.)
Since that letter was received, no changes have been made in the process, composition, or charter of the committees, and there has been no transparency in the process. Accordingly,
● We urge Council to say no to participating any further in this undemocratic process, including voting no on directing staff to make changes to or replace the current City roadmap with committee “recommendations.”
● We urge Council and the Mayor to create a prioritization process that engages the community and is truly representative of our community, especially including people from communities with lived experiences of discrimination, poverty, and historic oppression.
Please consider this letter signed by 31 nonprofit and ally members as you decide what action to take on February 14. You can reach REAL by emailing
Sincerely,
Louis Chicoine
Abode Services
Mylinh Pham
Asian American Center of Santa
Clara County
Richard Konda
Asian Law Alliance
Sparky Harlan
Bill Wilson Center
Gregory Kepferle
Catholic Charities of Santa Clara
County
Pete Settelmayer
Downtown College Prep
Beth Leary
Family Supportive Housing Inc.
Bob Nuñez
La Raza Roundtable
Gabby Chavez-Lopez
Latina Coalition of Silicon Valley
Darcie Green
Latinas Contra Cancer
Alison Brunner
Law Foundation of Silicon Valley
Gloria Baxter
Lighthouse of Hope Counseling
Center
Quency Phillips
Lighthouse Silicon Valley
Gisela Bushey
Loaves & Fishes Family Kitchen
Anjee Helstrup-Alvarez
MACLA/Movimiento de Arte y
Cultura Latino Americana
Hector Sanchez-Flores
National Compadres Network
Colsaria Henderson
Next Door Solutions to Domestic
Violence
Rhonda Berry
Our City Forest
Eva Terrazas
Pacific Clinics
Heather Cleary
Peninsula Family Service
Lauren Babb
Planned Parenthood Mar Monte
Sharon Winston
Project HIRED
Nathan Svoboda
Project MORE
Poncho Guevara
Sacred Heart Community Service
Wisa Uemura
San José Taiko
Sheri Burns
Silicon Valley Independent Living
Center and the SCC Aging Services
Collective
Kyra Kazantzis
Silicon Valley Council of Nonprofits
Regina Celestin-Williams
SV@Home
Yvonne Maxwell
Ujima Adult & Family Services
Sujatha Venkatraman
West Valley Community Services
Jennifer Masuda
Yu-Ai kai Japanese American
Community Senior Service
About the REAL Coalition
The REAL community of nonprofit leaders and allies has been meeting since June 2020 to use our positional power to advocate for a more racially -just and equitable society; to establish a peer network of leaders committed to fighting white supremacy and systemic racism in ourselves and our institutions; and to hold each other accountable to the promises we made in the Nonprofit Racial Equity Pledge. The REAL coalition is broadly representative of the nonprofit community including human and community services , behavioral health and health, arts and culture, domestic violence, older adults, food distribution, education, environmental, farming, legal, disability rights, LGTBQ rights, ethnic, immigrant rights, housing and homelessness, criminal justice reform, ur ban planning, and intermediary organizations, and others. Over 125 organizations have participated in the REAL coalition.
2/13/23, 3:48 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQA… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Budget Priorities -- Vision Zero and Bike Plan
sayanan sivaraman <
Mon 2/13/2023 3:38 PM
To:City Clerk <[email protected]>;Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>;Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>;Foley, Pam <[email protected]>;Cohen, David <[email protected]>;Torres, Omar <[email protected]>;Davis, Dev <[email protected]>;Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>;Batra, Arjun <[email protected]>;Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>;Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>;Doan, Bien <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>
Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Dear City Council:
My name is Sayanan Sivaraman. I live in Japantown, and I am a cycle commuter.
In the past year, San Jose drivers killed a record number of people: cyclists, pedestrians, and other road users.
As the City Council determines budget priorities, I'm writing to urge you to prioritize the following:
1. Fully fund Vision Zero.
2. Fully fund the DOT Better Bike Plan.
3. Fund and staff the Department of Transportation.
4. Adopt a pedestrian safety plan.
Sincerely
--
Sayanan Sivaraman, PhD
2/13/23, 4:15 PM Mail - City Clerk - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/[email protected]/id/AAQkAGJiNDY2NWI3LTY1ODktNDczNy1iYjdkLWZlNWFjYmFmNmQ3ZQAQAENUeJP… 1/1 [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Mayoral Transition Committee Report on Homelessness (2/14 Study Session) David Low < >
Mon 2/13/2023 4:06 PM
To:The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>;District1 <[email protected]>;District2 <[email protected]>;District3 <[email protected]>;District4 <[email protected]>;District5 <[email protected]>;District 6 <[email protected]>;District7 <[email protected]>;District8 <[email protected]>;District9 <[email protected]>;District 10 <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>
1 attachments (142 KB)
DH letter - Mayoral Transition Committee Report on Homelessness 02132023.pdf;
Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers,
Attached is a letter from Destination: Home CEO Jennifer Loving re: the Mayoral Transition Committee Report on Homelessness, which you all will discuss at tomorrow's Study Session.
Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or would like to discuss these issues further.
Thank you for your continued partnership to ending homelessness in our community.
Destination: Home Logo
DA VID LOW
Director of Policy & Communications
T | C
A
DestinationHomeSV .org
P: F:
E:
DESTINATIONHOMESV.ORG
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Roger Biscay
Cisco
Jan Bernstein Chargin
Gavilan College
Louis Chicoine
Abode Services
Jacky Morales-Ferrand
City of San Jose
Dontae Lartigue
Razing the Bar
Ky Le
County of Santa Clara
Jennifer Loving
Destination: Home
Preston Prince
SCC Housing Authority
Joel John Roberts
PATH
John A. Sobrato
The Sobrato Organization
Ben Spero
Spectrum Equity Investors
Nicole Taylor
Silicon Valley Community
Foundation
Ted Wang
Cowboy Ventures
Gary Wipfler
Apple
ENDING HOMELESSNESS IN SILICON VALLEY
February 13, 2023
Mayor & City Council
City of San Jose
200 East Santa Clara Street, 18th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Re: Mayoral Transition Committee Report on Homelessness
Dear Mayor Mahan and Members of the City Council,
Thank you for your continued leadership in addressing homelessness in our community.
Since 2020, the City of San Jose has been one of the lead partners driving the Santa Clara County Community Plan to End Homelessness - a comprehensive strategy that focuses on: 1) addressing the root causes of homelessness through system and policy change, 2) expanding homelessness prevention and housing programs to meet the need, and 3) improving quality of life for unsheltered individuals and creating healthy neighborhoods for all. And thanks to the commitment of partners like you, we have taken important steps in curbing the growth of homelessness in our community. (You can read more about the Community Plan at: https://destinationhomesv.org/community-plan/)
I appreciate that the Mayoral Transition Committee Report on Homelessness includes several recommendations and metrics that align with the Community Plan, and I wholeheartedly support the dual focus on expanding both interim and permanent housing programs. This is the same approach taken by our Community Plan, and it will be absolutely critical to our ultimate success in reducing and ending homelessness in our community.
However, I am deeply concerned that this report focuses so heavily on the impact of encampments on neighborhoods - without putting similar emphasis on the well-being of those who are forced to live in these horrific conditions on our streets. While we absolutely need to be mindful of the impacts of homelessness in areas occupied by housed residents and businesses, it should not supersede the impacts felt by people who are currently suffering on our streets.
In particular, I am disappointed that:
• The Committee did not choose to amend Outcome #2 to be inclusive of addressing the basic needs of people living in encampments; and • The Report lacks any recommended actions or metrics related to improving the well-being of these extremely vulnerable individuals.
P: F:
E:
DESTINATIONHOMESV.ORG
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Roger Biscay
Cisco
Jan Bernstein Chargin
Gavilan College
Louis Chicoine
Abode Services
Jacky Morales-Ferrand
City of San Jose
Dontae Lartigue
Razing the Bar
Ky Le
County of Santa Clara
Jennifer Loving
Destination: Home
Preston Prince
SCC Housing Authority
Joel John Roberts
PATH
John A. Sobrato
The Sobrato Organization
Ben Spero
Spectrum Equity Investors
Nicole Taylor
Silicon Valley Community
Foundation
Ted Wang
Cowboy Ventures
Gary Wipfler
Apple
ENDING HOMELESSNESS IN SILICON VALLEY
We cannot forget that the most severe impacts of our homelessness crisis are being felt by those without a roof over their heads.
As the City Council considers how to implement the recommendations from this report, I implore all of us to prioritize BOTH actions that will help alleviate the plight of those who have been forced to find shelter on our streets, a s well as actions to address impacts on surrounding neighborhoods, businesses and our broader community.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Loving
CEO
Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
FW: San Jose Budget: Please fully fund VISION ZERO for safer streets City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 2/14/2023 7:34 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: Moria Merriweather
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 12:39 AM
To: Doan, Bien <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>; Mahan, Ma <Ma [email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Foley, Pam <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Torres, Omar <[email protected]>; Davis, Dev <[email protected]>; Or z, Peter <Peter.Or [email protected]>; Batra, Arjun <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; [email protected]; shiloh ; sandhya laddha <sandhya >
Subject: San Jose Budget: Please fully fund VISION ZERO for safer streets
Dear Council Member Doan,
I live on Senter Road, near Tully Road, and I ride a bike. This means I ride a bike on some of the most dangerous streets in San Jose.
I want to keep riding my bike, because it contributes to my physical health, mental health, and social health. I bike because it connects me socially, emo onally and kinesthe cally to the places and people in my neighborhood.
Fully implemen ng the Vision Zero plan is an essen al step toward making San Jose a safer place to travel for all of us, and especially for bicycles and pedestrians.
Please priori ze funding to fully implement the Vision Zero plan as quickly as possible.
I support the recommenda ons of the Mayor’s Transi on Commi ee on Community Safety for funding Vision Zero, for the bike plan, for increased staffing for DOT, and for addi onal pedestrian safety measures.
I want desperately to bike on safer streets. While I s ve to ride as safely as I can, I know that what I can do to stay safe is small compared to the improvements in safety that our community can provide to all bicyclists by modifying the streets to protect bicyclists and pedestrians.
Thank you for your a en on to safer streets and a more bikeable, walkable, and socially connected community.
Moria Merriwather
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
FW: Agenda Item 1
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 2/14/2023 8:12 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: Kat Adamson >
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 8:00 AM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item 1
Hello,
My name is Kat and I am from Students Against Mass Incarcera on at SJSU. I'd like to urge City Council to not increase police staffing as this method has not been successful in reducing crime, homelessness, or mental health issues in the community. Instead, we should be focusing on non-police solu ons like further funding for the Trusted Response Urgent Support Team (TRUST). This team has been successful in ensuring that individuals requiring care that they will not receive in jail get it and are handled in a safe and produc ve manner. They need funding for a second field team and an addi onal call center to make sure that there is enough personnel to respond to crises in real- me instead of having a police response that would be ineffec ve and unsafe for those experiencing crises.
This ensures that residents are dealt with in a safe and secure manner by personnel trained for the task, not by police officers who may be reac ng nega vely in an emo onally charged situa on that they are untrained and unprepared for. Sta s cs show that 50% of individuals killed by SJ PD in 2013-2017 were struggling with mental illness, which shows that this is an epidemic that the police department is not responding to appropriately. Again, I urge City Council to invest in TRUST instead of increasing police staffing to end senseless violence against individuals with mental illnesses in the community.
Thank you,
Kat Adamson
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. given a local infraction by SJPD than white adults. From 2015-2020, San José has had the highest number of fatal encounters with police in the Bay Area, 15 of 19 of whom were people of color. Nearly half of those killed by police sufferered from mental illness or were experiencing a mental health crisis. No police have been prosecuted for any of these deaths." San Jose Mercury News, Sept. 2,2020.
The behavior of the SJPD has not changed. According to the most recent Sacred Heart report card on housing, immigration and economic justice - the San Jose City Council scored an "F" when it comes to decisions on policing.
San Jose City Council Report Cards — Sacred Heart
Community Service
See how we rate the Mayor and City Council on the issues that are important to Sacred Heart and its members.
b. The RiPs report included dozens of actionable recommendations, including that the City of San Jose to chip in for a second field team in SJ for the Trusted Responder Urgent Support Team (TRUST).
"RiPS is proposing that the City of San José invest in and develop new tools and systems to respond to specfic circumstances to create better outcomes for community members and better utilize police resources. Expanding and developing mobile community response teams for individuals experiencing mental health crises, addiction, homelessness or domestic abuse may be more effective at linking individuals to the services they need, may be more equitable by ensuring that professionals deeply trained in working with specic populations are giving appropriate responses, and may be more cost effcient than sending law enforcement personnel." [Rips Report page 5.]
This way is better for all: better for police, better for communities.
Do not sweep aside the thoughtful work put into the RiPs report. Evidence shows less "police on citizen violence" happens when law enforcement is not involved in mental health crises and traffic stops. We are fortunate to live in a place where a viable alternative is rolling out. The city of San Jose needs to robustly embrace alternative [read FUND alternatives], not just push the failing status quo.
Fund alternatives not just more police.
Deborah St. Julien
South San Jose for 37 years, recently redistricted into District2, Showing Up For Racial Justice @Sacred Heart,
Co-president of the board of my church - Urban Sanctuary, San Jose.
[External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
FW: Support for Community Safety Mayoral Transition Committee Recommendations City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 2/14/2023 9:12 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: Jonathan Schuppert >
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 9:06 AM
To: Torres, Omar <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>; Mahan, Ma <Ma [email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Support for Community Safety Mayoral Transi on Commi ee Recommenda ons
Dear Councilmember Torres,
I am a resident of San Jose's Northside neighborhood and I choose to walk and ride a bike (my own and the bike share system) for recrea on, commu ng, and errands. On countless occasions I have been nearly hit by people driving who are not paying a en on.
I personally know people who have been hit, including one of my best friends who was hit while riding along San Carlos Street. The driver sped off, leaving her badly injured and alive today because of the helmet I previously gave her for her birthday.
The issues seem to have go en worse since the start of the pandemic and are not ge ng any be er. I have seen too many ar cles about people who have been killed or seriously injured on our streets and we must do something.
I support the recommenda ons from the Mayor’s Transi on Commi ee on Community Safety to:
Fully fund the Vision Zero Ac on Plan and deliver projects as quick as possible Fund new Department of Transporta on staff to keep these projects moving and seeking grants to get more money for future projects and programs
Fund the Bike Plan
Adopt a pedestrian safety improvement program
Thank you for your dedica on to the City of San Jose and the people who live and work here. Please priori ze the safety of people, especially those most vulnerable on our streets.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Schuppert
2/14/23
Good morning everyone,
My name is Esperanza and I am currently a full-time student at San José State University and major in Chicano and Chicana Studies. I also currently work as a Behavioral Specialist at Center for Social Dynamics (CSD) which is a mental health service that helps provide life-changing services to children and adults with developmental delays, including autism. I learned from my field of work that it is important to provide mental health services in order to see children and adults safely receive the care and health that they need in order to prosper in society. I firmly believe that The City of San José must increase the support of mental health and substance use treatments for the individuals who reside in San José, who may experience a crisis and do not want to heavily rely on calling 911. Marginalized communities have historically experienced and also expressed their fears of calling 911 due to the fear of law enforcement response who may not know the approaches of handling a delicate situation. It is important to emphasize the importance of providing mental health and substance use treatments in order for individuals to have a safe alternative to rely on the help they need.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important [External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
FW: Support the RTC!!
City Clerk <[email protected]>
Tue 2/14/2023 11:00 AM
To:Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: E A < >
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 10:54 AM
To: The Office of Mayor Ma Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Jimenez, Sergio <[email protected]>; Torres, Omar <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Or z, Peter <Peter.Or [email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Davis, Dev <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Foley, Pam <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>
Subject: Support the RTC!!
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
My name is Elizabeth and I live in D3 & I am a community leader a part of SHHAC.
Thanks so much to the Transi onal Priority Se ng Commi ee for recommending the Right to Counsel. We believe it will be a game changer for our community in preven ng the traumas of evic on, displacement, and homelessness that have systema cally burdened the Black, La nx, and Na ve communi es that are low-income. Though this policy will be one that benefits everyone. Moreover, it will even the playing field for tenants. Would any one of us consider appearing in court without a lawyer? It is about doing what's fair.
Furthermore, it will create tremendous cost savings for our community and aid in bringing a sense of stability in our region.
I encourage you all to support the RTC in San Jose.
Thank You
[External Email]
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Public Comment for Today's Council Session
Darcie Green < >
Tue 2/14/2023 11:04 AM
To:City Clerk <[email protected]>
You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important
Hello,
Please see my public comment for today's meeting record.
Thank you
February 14, 2023
Members of the San Jose City Council
[email protected]
We know what keeps us safe: living in communities where people of every culture and background have fair wages, great schools, and affordable healthcare, where we address problems with proven solutions like social support and community care. As was just beautifully stated by Congresswoman Summer Lee, Public safety doesn’t begin with policing — it begins with investments in the community. Public safety is about a living wage, after school programs and other violence interrupters — it’s about empowering neighbors to care for each other and nurturing a community where everyone feels at home, regardless of their age, occupation, income or ethnicity. Unless our budget diverts funds to services and solutions that advances that vision, we’re not having a serious conversation about reducing crime.
The Transition Committee has public safety on its agenda, but the list of priorities does not include raising living wages, preventing gentrification and displacement, providing lasting dignity and respect for all members of our community. We all want to eradicate violence from our city — but what about the economic violence, police violence and institutionalized neglect that our communities have been subject to? Let’s use our city budget to rid our community of ALL violence.
There is nothing revolutionary about a public safety strategy that calls for expansion of police budget and power as the metric of success and there is no common sense in fighting to preserve a system that continually fails to produce true safety and justice in our city. Fully funding Vision Zero, self-enforcing streets, analyzing calls for service and mental health partnerships are good and important priorities but “more police” is not an adequate outcome or metric of success. It is not even an adequate measurement of safety.
There is a better way. In fact, we only need to look to the pandemic to see that there are millions of ways WE, in community, keep each other safe when systems fall short. We will not let up until ALL residents of this city are truly safe, secure and sustained and until our safety is measured by the quality of our social conditions and strength of our relationships rather than the number of police officers on our streets. This is what justice looks like. We cannot allow this Mayor or anyone to spin a narrative that encourages us to dehumanize each other or cement the dehumanization of our neighbors into our city budget or our city policies.
Last year, the City of San Jose’s Reimagining Public Safety Advisory Board took time and care to involve a broad, diverse set of community stakeholders and impacted people to thoughtfully and carefully develop 50 proposals spanning three areas: police reform, alternatives responses and improving social conditions. We didn’t do this in secret. We didn’t hide our membership roster. We didn’t close our meetings to the public and we didn’t bulldoze through it in a three meeting arch. After being asked by the city to participate in this public service and after presenting the 50 recommendations to the Council, we heard nothing. No words. No actions. Little follow through. And the budget allocation meant for reimagining public safety was given to the police department for existing tools. Not a dollar was spent on reimagining. Fortunately, you have an opportunity in this next budget to make it right.
I ask you to please commit to using the existing city sponsored and community led reimagining public safety recommendations as your starting point to truly revolutionize the way we keep our communities safe. The lives of our youth, our elders and families are on the line — we cannot afford to waste more time or resources on solutions that we know make us less safe. Please give us a budget that puts people first.
Sincerely,
Darcie Green
Resident, District 5
Community Health Advocate
Member, City of San Jose Reimagining Public Safety Advisory Board