T-3602\ 2016682_2.doc
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL
FROM: NORA FRIMANN
City Attorney
SUBJECT: Conflicts Review - Airport
Commission Applicants
DATE: May 1, 2023
BACKGROUND
This Office routinely reviews applications to City Boards and Commissions. The applications do not provide complete information; however, they do occasionally disclose potential conflicts of interest or incompatible offices. The purpose of this memorandum is to highlight major areas of potential conflict that are disclosed by the applications. To analyze potential conflicts, it is necessary to consider the duties of the particular commission to which the applicant is seeking appointment.
COMMISSION DUTIES
Under the Municipal Code, the Airport Commission is an advisory body that makes recommendations to the Council and the Airport Department on matters on its workplan as approved by the Rules and Open Government Committee. The Airport Commission serves as an advisory body to the City Council and the Director of Aviation regarding Airport noise related issues and provides a public forum for Airport noise related issues, policies, and decisions. The A irport Commission is also responsible to monitor curfew intrusion information and review s the City’s Airport public information program an d the City’s A irport noise complaint procedures . The Commission also hears appeals of administrative citations issued by the Director of Aviation for violations of the City’s Curfew Ordinance and appeals of revocations or denials of Airport permits.
LEGAL CONFLICTS THAT MAY PRECLUDE VOTE OR PARTICIPATION
Certain positions may preclude a commissioner from participating in a commission discussion or from voting if a matter involving the entity comes before the commission.
While this list is not complete, these types of conflicts generally fall within one or more of the following situations:
• An application shows entities that are “sources of income” to a potential commissioner within the 12 months preceding the start of the commission term, as defined under the Political Reform Act.
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
May 1, 2023
Subject: Conflicts Review – Airport Commission Applicants
2016682_2.doc
• An application shows sources of income to a Spouse or Domestic Partner of a potential commissioner within the 12 months preceding the start of the commission term.
• An applicant or the Spouse or Domestic Partner of an applicant is an Officer or Board Member of an entity and it is foreseeable that the entity could be involved in a matter coming before the commission.
APPEARANCE OF BIAS
There may be facts that would not amount to a legal conflict of interest requiring a commissioner to recuse him or herself from a commission vote or discussion, but the relationship could create an appearance of bias on the part of the commissioner. City Council policy requires commissions to be free from bias in their decision making and may require a commissioner to recuse him or herself if the facts could reasonably lead one to conclude that the applicant would be biased for or against an entity or entities.
APPLICANTS
Hai Bui – Mr. Bui is a resident of Distr ict 2 and is employed by VM ware as a Principal Software Engineer. His application discloses neither incom patible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Mike Campbell – Mr. Campbell is a resident of Distr ict 10 and is employed by Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. as Director of Environmental Analysis. His application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Carlos Casas-Hawkins – Mr. Casas-Hawkins is a resident of District 10 and works as an Administrative Assistant at Luther Burbank School District . His application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Jason Gordon – Mr. Gordon is a resident of District 10 and is employed by Workday as a Senior Technical Program Manager . His spouse i s employed at Sutter Health. His application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Prateek Gupta – Prateek Gupta resides in District 4, is a current Airport Commissioner and is self -employed. The application discloses neither incompati ble offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Robert Hencken – Mr. Hencken is a resident of Distr ict 9 and is the Owner and President of Hencken Development Consultants, LLC. Mr. Hencken worked for the City of San Jose as a Civil Engineer I/II and Associate Civil Engineer from 1981 to 1989. His spouse i s retired from the City of San Jose. His application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
May 1, 2023
Subject: Conflicts Review – Airport Commission Applicants
2016682_2.doc
Elizabeth Holt – Ms. Hol t resides i n Distric t 3 and works at Silicon Valley Bank as Senior Manager, Talent Development . Her application discloses neither incompati ble offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Dana Todd Iketani – Mr. Iketani is a resident of District 6 and works at S hield Intellectual Property PC as an At torney. His application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Manoj Kumar – Manoj Kumar resides in District 1 and works at Google and lists a job title as “Leadership.” The application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
John Lei pelt – Mr. Leipelt resides i n Distric t 2 and lists his occupation as a retired suprevisor. Mr. Leipelt ’s spouse is a teacher at Evergreen School District. The application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Cristian Martinez -Carranza – Mr. Martinez-Carranza is a resident of Distr ict 3 and works at Varian as a Supplier Quality Engineer. H is spouse is employed at DCP Alum Rock High School as a Special Education Teacher . His application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Ravi Pathak – M r. Pathak is a resident of District 7 and works at Oracle as a Senior Director of Oracle Fusion Cloud SaaS. His spouse works at CDC as a Mas ter Teacher.
His application discloses no other incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Babu Ramaraj – Babu Ramaraj resides i n Distric t 6 and works at Adob e Inc. as Director of Program and Operations. Mr. Ramaraj’s spouse is a teacher at ACE Charter School in San Jose. The application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Greg Richardson – Mr. Richardson is a resident of District 3 and works at the S anta Clara Valley Transportation Authority as the A ssistant GM and CFO. Mr. Richar dson’s spouse is a retired teacher. His application discloses neither incompatible of fices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Antonio Shelly – Mr. Shelly is a resident of District 3 and works at CoreSite as a Data Center Operations Manager. His application discloses neither incompatible of fices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Jaya Singhal – Jaya Singhal resides in District 6 and works at Ariat International Inc. as Director of Data Science and Strategy . The application discloses neither incompati ble offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
May 1, 2023
Subject: Conflicts Review – Airport Commission Applicants
2016682_2.doc
Nick Wester – Mr. Wester resides i n Distric t 6 and works at Azazie, I nc. as a QC Supervisor. His application discloses neither incompati ble offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
Margaret Wheeler – Ms. W heeler is a resident of District 4 and she is retired. Her spouse is reti red, too. H er application discloses neither incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.
CONCLUSION
None of the applicants appear to hold any incompati ble offices or to have conflicts of interest that would preclude them from serving on the Airport Commission.
NORA FRIMANN,
City Attorney
By: _______________________
Kevin Fisher
Assistant City Attorney
cc: Jennifer Maguire, City Manager
Toni J. Taber, City Clerk
T-1881.005
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Nora Frimann
City Attorney
SUBJECT: Measure T Community
Oversight Committee
DATE: August 2, 2023
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMO
BACKGROUND
This Office routinely reviews applications to City Boards, Commissions and Committees.
The applications do not provide complete information; however, they do occasionally disclose potential conflicts of interest or incompatible offices. The purpose of this memorandum is to highlight major areas of potent ial conflict that are disclosed by the applications for the Measure T Community Oversight Committee. In order to analyze potential conflicts, it is necessary to consider the duties of the particular commission or committee to which the applicant is seeking appointment.
COMMITTEE DUTIES
On November 6, 2018, San José voters approved the Disaster Preparedness, Public Safety, and Infrastructure Bond Measure (“Measure T”) authorizing the City of San José (“City”) to issue up to $650 million of municipal Gener al Obligation Bonds (“Measure T Bonds”) to finance the cost of land or improvement of land for projects that will upgrade public safety facilities to improve emergency and disaster response, repair deteriorating bridges vulnerable to earthquakes, repave st reets and potholes in the worst condition, prevent flooding and water contamination including the acquisition of land in the Coyote Valley for these purposes, and repair critical infrastructure.
The Measure T Community Oversight Committee (“Measure T Comm ittee”) was established pursuant to Resolution No. 79165 that the City Council adopted on June 18, 2019. Per Resolution No. 79165, the Measure T Committee is required to meet once each year and has the following responsibilities:
1. Review the expenditure of the proceeds of Measure T Bonds to ascertain consistency with the voter approved purposes for the funds;
2. In connection with the review of expenditures of Measure T Bonds, review and forward to the City Council the City Auditor’s separate audit of the proceeds of the Measure T Bonds as well as the Director of Finance’s annual report on the amount of Measure T Bonds issued and the amount of ad valorem tax collected for each prior fiscal year ending June 30
th; and
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
August 2, 2022
Subject: Measure T Community Oversight Committee
T-1881.005
3. Review the status of projects funded with t he proceeds of Measure T Bonds and forward a status report on the pending Measure T projects to the City Council.
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
The Measure T Committee is to be comprised of fifteen members, with each member nominated pursuant to the process set forth in San José Municipal Code 2.08.180, as may be amended. Each Councilmember recommends one Committee member who is a resident of the district of the nominating Council Office. The Mayor recommends five members as citywide representatives, with each member possessing subject matter expertise in one of the following fields: public safety, environmental issues, labor, business, and finance or accounting. Each of the nominations shall be considered by the full Council for formal appointment. Nominees m ust be residents of San José. Subject matter expertise in the fields of emergency and disaster response, public safety, finance, and/or transportation is highly desirable.
APPLICANT
Olivia Navarro – Ms. Navarro resides in District 6. She is employed by LiUNA (Laborer International Union North America) as a political consultant/community relations. Her spouse is employed by the County of Santa Clara in community relations. The application indicates that she works with labor and serves as a delegate for the South Bay Labor Council and building trades.
CONCLUSION
The applicant does not appear to hold any incompatible offices. Based on the information in the application, there does not appear to be any conflicts of interest that would preclude them from serving on the Measure T Committee. It is possible that if the Measure T Committee was asked to advise on matters involving specific projects or matters to which the applicant was involved in on behalf of LiUNA that there could be a financial conflict of interest or appearance of conflict of interest. The applicant does have subject matter expertise in labor to be a citywide representative. The City Council may wish to consider the above comments in considering the appointment to the Measure T Committee.
NORA FRIMANN
City Attorney
/s/
By_____________________________
Rosa Tsongtaatarii
Chief Deputy City Attorney
cc: Jennifer Maguire, City Manager
Toni Taber, City Clerk