Cities Index.
Letter from the Public

San Jose City Council
October 7, 2025

Document
Letter from the Public
Meeting
October 7, 2025
Body
San Jose City Council
Original file
164 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Outlook
FW: Sale of City-owned railroad ROW - Council 10/7 Item 2.7 File No. PP17-003 From City Clerk <[email protected]>
Date Wed 10/1/2025 1:10 PM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
From: Jordan Moldow
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2025 1:04 PM
To: Ice, Kevin <[email protected]>; Zenk, Jessica <[email protected]>; Smith, Ryan <[email protected]; Sewell, Liz <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Sale of City-owned railroad ROW - Council 10/7 Item 2.7 File No. PP17-003 [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] I'd like to suggest that DOT, PNRS, and City Council should adopt a policy around retention, maintenance, and usage (or qualifications for disposal) of former railroad rights-of-way. And that the City should hold off on entertaining these kinds of sales until such a policy is in place.

Some other reasons to consider holding onto this parcel instead of selling it:
• Even if this ROW isn't in the trails master plan, maybe it should be. It doesn't need to be high priority, but we could use more trails everywhere.
• Trails are a nice alternative to walking/biking alongside the street. The trail segment doesn't have to be long to be useful.
• Trails through industrial parks can be attractive to employees and employers, and can be a benefit to everyone in the area.
• Trails crossing roads at mid-block can be safer and more connected than trails crossing roads at four-way intersections. So we shouldn't reject this as a future trail because of the mid-block crossings.
• Even if we don't develop a trail, that strip of land can be used as a location for tree mitigation from industrial redevelopments in the immediate area. And in general can be useful as a permeable green surface in a pavement-heavy industrial area. • If UPPR ever abandons the adjacent Warm Springs line, it could make for an extensive trail. And the parcel being considered today could be used as a trailhead.

I also believe that the City shouldn't sell any land, it should charge rent, with options to cancel the lease if it gives a few years notice that it is planning a project that will use that parcel. I think this could be an appropriate compromise for the parcel being considered today.

Thanks,
Jordan Moldow (speaking on his own behalf)
District 3, Japantown
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

← All documents from this meeting